tasksource/jigsaw_toxicity · Datasets at Hugging Face

id stringlengths 16 16	comment_text stringlengths 6 5k	toxic int64 0 1	obscene int64 0 1	insult int64 0 1
0527d9c4ff997a3e	Why the hell did you fucking write that?! I can vandalize Wikipedia whenever I want!	1	1	1
05287ad5cb9e632f	English in this article? Is it just me or is English really pretty bad in this article?	0	0	0
052a2dd0e76e2370	hello sir yunshi, sorry,i dont know sitush account used by multiple persons.please sir,for mutharaiyar articles i gave lot of reliable sources..please undo previous day deletion...	0	0	0
052a64799702b6b6	Summaries Sorry bout that... I'll try to remember better. Mahalo. Psst... love the smiley>	0	0	0
052b1ed37789460f	Hi Robert..hv asked the author to give a proper copyright permission..in the format as required by wikipedia. Will get it in a couple of days and send it across to the relevant authorities...Ravi	0	0	0
052bc2cd53a2320f	(UTC) I think these are some very good questions, and until they are addressed by a professional, the article needs to be in dispute. Are there 60 species, or 61? Could there only be 59? These are questions of significance. 18:43, 14 November 2008	0	0	0
052d61f9a33e209a	" Not done: It currently reads ""at least 5.5 million"", and in the section on The Holocaust, it reads ""5.5 to six million"", with references. I'm not sure what the issue is. (talk - contribs) "	0	0	0
052d9243793d9efd	Hi, 牛岩, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Introduction to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article Simplified Manual of Style Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. However, there is a small issue with your username. As it is in a non-Latin alphabet script it may not display correctly for many other users. Although usernames like yours are not prohibited, Wikipedia's signature guideline and username policy encourage you, as a courtesy to other users, to alter your signature so that it also includes a transliteration of your username using Latin characters, so others can see it correctly. For the how-to of tailoring your username, please see WP:CUSTOMSIG. Thanks, and feel free to message me about anything. ترجمة \| թարգմանություն \| tərcümə \| пераклад \| অনুবাদ \| превод \| 翻译 \| თარგმანი \| μετάφραση \| અનુવાદ \| תרגום \| अनुवाद \| 翻訳 \| ಅನುವಾದ \| បកប្រែ \| 번역 \| ການແປພາສາ \| превод \| भाषांतर करणे] \| ترجمه \| перевод \| превод \| மொழிபெயர்ப்பு \| అనువాద \| การแปล \| переклад \| dịch \| \| יבערזעצונג	0	0	0
052f696b2d4a4491	" A tag has been placed on Beezwax, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please don't remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you've created yourself; it's considered vandalism. You can use the tag as specified. If you have any questions, leave a note on my talk page. "	0	0	0
052fb1def4fe4790	My policy on not English articles if no one else has already tagged them: delete on sight - A1 no context will do - I cannot identify the articles subject! and then leave a message for the author such as this one - short but sufficient. — RHaworth	0	0	0
052fbdf4ce567988	My side of the story Attention, douchebags and douchetees. I have been labled as a Terrorist on this site. BULL TO THE SHIT! I simply have a vast amount of knowlege on a wide range of topics. Scjessey, for example did not mention he is a fucking douchebag on his article. So I had to ammend this. I was simply trying to spread the truth. ALLLALLALALALALALAlAlALAALALAALALALALALAl. Sorry. I have to do that every 5 minutes or I go to hell. ALLALALALALALALALALALALALALALALLALALALALALLLALALALA ALLAH 4EVER!	1	1	1
052fd5daae4f7b54	your support for Chris Lawson Are you sure you want to support this guy? Look at his source/quote for making the Red Baron jewish. read the discussion page on it. See the opposers views on his request page. It scares me. JohnHistory http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Manfred_von_Richthofen http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Clawson	0	0	0
052ff0b0b4e0adcf	You blocked me before I even made a second offense.	0	0	0
0530479783261b14	The particular section lists what has been claimed in rebuttal to the code theft charge. That the claims regarding the significance of C to C++ translation and 64 bit conversion seem spurious, false or dubious to C/C++ programmers are acknowledged. That the Medievia web page makes blatantly false statements about dates, the origination of other muds, and the significance of the above I also acknowledge. I don't believe the article section is about uncovering the truth of their claims. The only fact necessary to presenting that viewpoint is that they've claimed it. Also presenting a lengthy history of public proclamations and announcements by the games principals which contradict their own official web history page is beyond the scope, I think, of what most people care about.	0	0	0
0532eeee474b2c6d	I have added some information on Melina's run in other wrestling promotions, I still need to add some more about her run in OVW, feel free to edit the information	0	0	0
053315d473d5f204	Google search predominantly shows the mixed martial arts over the football player.	0	0	0
053378b5c8d76936	" No it wasn't scrapped. Alicia's version remains as the original and 50 Cent's version is just a sample of it. Also, her version charted in the US and received plenty of coverage enough to have its own separate article. Regards. —21 "	0	0	0
053391f22acedcd3	Conflict of interest? Your one-and-only, quite large edit to Exhilway strongly suggests a conflict of interest to me. If so, please disclose this conflict of interest on your user page. Additional information can be found here.	0	0	0
0533c68b6e61e5ee	Arji, what makes you think this assertion is mistaken? It is not my assertion, it is the conclusion of this agencies report, taken to be reputable enough to be run by several respectable news carriers around the world. Naming me a troll is a classy touch, and calling for all dialogue with me to cease should be grounds for your indef banning from wikipedia. The fact that you and Kim don't believe the conclusions does not matter, the evidence passes WP:V and WP:RS. The evidence has been released to the media and no-one of repute (That's not you Kim BTW) has challenged the validity or accuracy of the study. The fact that the study doesn't include Chinas massive underground coal mine fires only helps the conclusions of the report.	0	0	0
05342a65eab40629	" Firstly, some of the examples you used were from the personal attack pages...maybe you should read your own posts? Also, the reason I decided they were inane and decided to ignore them was because they did not directly apply to what I had said. Perhaps they applied to the numerous inferences that you made in reference to what I said but they did not apply to what I said and meant. Perhaps you could try not to infer or assume what I mean and try not to take offense so easily. I am respecting the basic rules of Wikipedia, but I also exploited ""loop holes"" in the rules. So if you want to include what I did in the rules then do so, but you should state what you want and not infer your own meaning. And I'm so upset because you and several other people have been complete and total assholes to me and to another person who tried to post this same page. You asked that we do something, i.e. explain the significance of the clan, etc, and we did but you deleted it anyway. And then you ask for more stuff and you give it to us. Also, one of the pages I read on here says that the information has to be verifiable but not the truth...well what kind of bullshit is that? If this is truly an encyclopedia then dont you state the truth? Also, if I go and post some article some other place rather than the clans home page then I can site that and it becomes verifiable right? If you say no, then this is just another example of something that is not explicitly stated and a loop hole that people can exploit. Before you go around messing with other peoples posts maybe you could get your rules and priorities straight. "	0	0	0
05347a9955ff8575	":::::::Understood. And just wondering, why is this section called RfA? I am far from having enough experience to become an admin, nor do I have any wish to become one currently. Triple M "	0	0	0
05365218ecab2924	There are 4 proposed theories and none of them weighs more than the others. Either all of them should be included and summarized in the conclusion, or the generic current version that states the following should be kept: Although the actual circumstances and timing of the physical destruction of the Library remain uncertain, it is however clear that by the Eighth century A.D., the Library was no longer a significant institution and had ceased to function in any important capacity.	0	0	0
0536d2f25f58e41d	because you blocked me	0	0	0
05372fd007b996a7	No problem, the other thing is that when I read medical pages, I start to think I have the same symptoms - I wonder of other people are like that.	0	0	0
053820f28e2f3b8a	" Elelland Hello Humus I am sorry if I have placed this note in the wrong spot. I m very inexperienced with Wikipedia. I was enthralled by Wikipedia. Initially. That is until I met Eleland. I noticed that you had some interesting discussions with Eleland. Eleland engineered a small article which I contributed some information to be deleted. He organised a ""kangaroo court"" made duplicitous unfounded claims and then set up a false consensus. The Article was on Ed O'Loughlin Fairfax publishing MidEast correspondent. The said individual has a unfortunate habit of mixing reporting and commentary. He was amongst the candidates for this year's HR.com dishonest reporter award - despite being in the Australia only catchment area - so you can imagine the quality of his journalism. Anyway Eleland did a great job of protecting him and got the article deleted. So I studied Eleland a little. I've looked at over 100 of his posts on the Arab Israel conflict. More than 95 were directly anti-Israel. His modus has been generally to unfairly rubbish the references of the pro-Israel side. In this way he has undermined many many articles. Personally I don't care what his opinion is, but when he uses his editorial power and influence at Wikipedia to falsely invalidate, delete, manipulate etc. I think there is a problem. Wikipedia is, I am afraid, beginning to read like Eleland wrote the script. Who is Eleland? What power does he actually have? Can anything be done? Adon Emmet If you post a reply here I will contact here or even by e-mail"	0	0	0
053825bca5fbd47e	I see no evidence that the expected (required?) merge notice () was ever posted to the page in question. This casts serious doubts on the legitimacy of any supposed consensus obtained in that discussion, especially if the other articles were likewise not tagged appropriately during the discussion.	0	0	0
0538591a8ed48f70	" Person of interest little did he know that ""Person of interest"" its a TV show mystery solved 72.185.61.209 "	0	0	0
0538a7ea5a63af6b	it would be good to know who is funding this	0	0	0
0538fb8b2eef622e	Moral Defense, you slimy toad you.	1	0	1
0539f36907945292	Ta. Well I still think there might be some against this, I don't know if it offsets any numbering of the films, so I was hesitant to change it straight away. I don't blame anyone for questioning this, because this is the first thing I looked at when I saw the list on their website...	0	0	0
053b24b25f48a5e7	Pursuant to the Wikipedia's policy on biography of living persons I have removed parts of this biopiece that impugn Andrew Li's integrity, impartiality, and honesty as a judge without citation. The author of those parts claimed, without support, that they are quoting from the South China Morning Post. However, as participants of civilized discussions would immediately recognize, simply saying that your source is from the South China Morning Post without giving us the date and page number is not a citation.	0	0	0
053ceb31fc1a90a8	Comments on password hacking I really don't think it was appropriate to talk about your issues about your password being stolen on a completely unrelated subject.As the header said, it was only supposed to be a discussion about improvements to the pet food crisis article, and your comments should have been deleted. Just because you were careless enough to leave your password for someone to steal, you do not need to annoy other people with your frustrations and tell everyone to panic, the world is not coming to an end as you keep exagerating, and Im sure most other people arent stupid enough to lose their password.But like	0	0	0
053d05eec276cb75	You did not even know what HE wrote on the deletion log for Barbados–France relations, got to it, and you will see that HE has cursed. And now you are taking me (a victim) to a hostile situation!	0	0	0
053e1010a3533c3d	:Janus Hasildor A tag has been placed on Janus Hasildor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template to the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. babble	0	0	0
053e8f0e22bbc4bc	What is your deal? Making apparently random reverts?	0	0	0
053eef41f1eee325	It is merely a decorative indicator and should be on its own line to appear properly.	0	0	0
053faf561066632f	Hey now, please assume good faith. His middle name is indeed Lorraine (if you go to Madison Square Garden it's on the plaque that's dedicated to him), and I could have sworn when I read the article it corroborated that. I was mistaken on the latter.	0	0	0
05400f98d9a7ef8d	" (UTC) It's common use is not as a proper noun. The dictionary article referenced in this article talks about the dispute between horse breeders, and ""people who are not in the horse-breeding business"". Wikipedia is not an encyclopaedia for horse breeders. It is for the public. 23:51, 6 June 2010"	0	0	0
054032f0cb3ecd35	You're biased. I made it a point since I signed up here that none of you exist.	1	0	0
054072914a17434b	Yeah, they're both puff-pieces written with obvious COI. One puff article is better than 2. The Dissident Aggressor	0	0	0
05421783947fcc50	Hi good to see you deleting stuff on the speedy deletion backlog! Have you rescued anything?	0	0	0
054270201da7b6c8	Hurricane Floyd Such a pretty user talk page, I don't like ruining it by writing all over it. Well, anyways, I saw that you were successful at getting Hurricane Dennis to featured status. There is another hurricane-related article up for peer review at Wikipedia:Peer review/Hurricane Floyd. Would you mind taking a look and offering some advice?	0	0	0
05434c37cd87a525	" In that case, I'm truly sorry. I obviously interpreted it wrongly. Cheers, "	0	0	0
05437d98fba6a0e9	appearance of Mizrahi Jews	0	0	0
0543ff4f1921973d	" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~~ [t - c] If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices."	0	0	0
054498d7d5fc2f85	Hello Mr. Gordon. I didn't feel like waiting until 2009 or one yar later to appeal. I would like to sincerely apologize, and I want to know if you are willing to accept these conditions. I don't want to be viewed as a threat, as I am quite nearby. t	0	0	0
05452c3ec6ac1859	well fag... block me. block me?! oh the world will shurly end! come off your high horse. i'll say what i want about you. if you continue bashing me then i will just have to post complaints about you on EVERY b log and forum i can find. every chat room will be filled with how Redfarmer (did your mom come up with that name?) is untrustworthy. if you block me i can always find info on another site. a site where they don't allow people (or FREAKS) like you to delete pages on a whim! so you gonna block me? ban me? go ahead. but be warned... without being able to edit pages. i can't help you by giving you instructions on how to change your diapers. sorry. leonhart178	1	1	1
0545ffcf70c9c99c	He is director of the Tate. Done.	0	0	0
054608ae9fa4b9cd	What I was referring to is The Goon Show. The Pink Oboe was the main ne'er do well spy character in one of the shows. My old decrepit mind won't allow me to remember which one, but it will come back to me eventually.	0	0	0
05465495f971fe78	Licensing issues In 2007, you created Malaysian Federal Roads System by copying from at least one other Wikipedia article. Where did it come from? If the source article is not identified, we can't use the text. Wikipedia's contributors do not release their material in public domain, but retain the right to credit for their contributions. (talk)	0	0	0
0546acba02a28caf	If the LAW is a single use weapon, isn't this a disadvtage as compared to the original Bazooka (granted it does not leave a smoke trail and has no recoil).	0	0	0
0546f3319bc782c5	" Some baklava for you! Thanks for your copyedit of The Long, Hot Summermuch appreciated! "	0	0	0
05476e7b7750269d	Wow J Delanoy, you must really love Brit Hume and hate science!!!!!	0	0	0
0547d66f6e35a3c5	Link: Age of Mythology Heaven Added link to Age of Mythology heaven. It has loads more info than can ever be described on one wiki page. Also, is a place to go for support for the game, as developers have abandoned it.	0	0	0
0547e12ce03948d3	"== Citation == The first 'citation needed' tag at the end of the fourth paragraph of the 'First theatre: Theatre Royal, Bridges Street (1663)' section is covered in Walter Macqueen-Pope's 1945 book ""Theatre Royal, Drury Lane, publisher Allen, page 33. If you wish me to type the wording here so you can verify, please let me know. Thanks. - Chat "	0	0	0
05485fc540f053f2	" Friend, no problem with me. But just look at the discussion page and history of edits when ""suspicious"" persons are added. Croats or Serbs will claim he wasn't Bosniak but Croat or Serb, Bosniaks will denie and so on. But I'm glad you proposed Tvrtko, I'm considering to later add total number of votes, so we will see.fuchs "	0	0	0
05497ed19512b588	Considering the legal issues surrounding ROMs, it would be a bad idea.. I'm not sure which one, but i'm fairly sure that posting the ROM would violate some Wikipedia rule..	0	0	0
0549926bbe6f4247	" The subject of the ongoing attempts by politically biased Wikipedia editors to suppress any mention of Neil deGrasse Tyson's embarrassment has prompted widespread derision from the political right. ""[B]logs and conservative opinion pieces"" may not be reliable for statements of fact (see [WP:BIAS]), but if they are well-known, high-traffic, non-fringe, etc. they (National Review, Volokh Conspiracy, Weekly Standard. etc., etc.) ABSOLUTELY establish the existence of a controversy. Partisan dismissals of the significance of the controversy from the other side of the political spectrum subtract nothing from that fact. "	0	0	0
0549d0b39df651db	False Friends of the Slavist I recommend you talk with Miloš Rančić about this. He studies slavistic.	0	0	0
054b1b0019a6bd9c	" A barnstar for you! The Barnstar of Diligence of stalking people I just had a chance to see what you've done to the high-speed trading, and keeping i one sided to the finacial industry. greak work stalker bo "	0	0	0
054b37be76678daa	I'm sorry that I must say this. I have never come across a more idiotic editor on Wikipedia. Congratulations on making it to the top of my list. I mean that in a congratulatory sense entirely; in no way is it meant to offend or sound sarcastic. I wouldn't call you an editor though. You're more of a pollutant to this project and one with extreme perversion of perception. Please reread the discussion at the talk page. Based on what you last posted there it is painfully obvious that you ignored, or did not comprehend, much of what I tried explaining to you multiple times at that talk page.	0	0	1
054b74afe8718a46	As far as I know there were no warrants of arrest for Thomas Jefferson from the British Crown. There is nothing in the writings of Thomas Jefferson that states he was committing treason and could be hung. Jefferson, Washingtion, and Adams, according to Ferling (2000) believed they were slaves to the British government, not having any rights. They did not view themselves as outlaw rebels, rather, they wanted to be free to make their own laws that protected white people. Franklin apparently is the only Founding Father who mentioned being hung. Was Jefferson in the room at the time Franklin made this statement?	0	0	0
054c3e503771ece0	" My harrassment of you? How ironic… 05:12, September 6, 2005 (UTC)"	0	0	0
054dea7c4454fb5d	Great discussion point Jimbo, although I don't think discussion is actually required, the foundation should be able to just do this without the support of the users that are disputing the edits. In really difficult disputed issues I agree the wikimedia Foundation could hire experienced editors, although I wouldn't support any wikipedia connected interviewers, use and pay someone totally independent - independent notable reporters to interview and report on the problematic content issue and report that in a wp:rs source thus giving full independent closure to the dispute.	0	0	0
054f92b9b3674bf2	" Misleading reference to study? In the section on lead paint in art (which I largely wrote), someone added the following: ""Lead paint will often become discolored over long periods of time. This is due to the reaction of the lead carbonate in the paint with traces of hydrogen sulfide in the air and with acids, often from fingerprints. [2] As a result, many older works of art that used lead paint now show some discoloration."" As I found this surprising, I went and carefully read the study being cited. Their research seemed to refer only to lead in aqueous media on paper, although that wasn't absolutely clear. But lead paint is almost never used that way! Artists working in transparent watercolor (aquarelle) don't usually use white paint, or just occasionally a bit of ""Chinese White"" (not lead) to make corrections. And opaque watercolors (gouache) and acrylic (polymer) artist's paints typically use titanium dioxide or (rarely) zinc white, but never lead. Normally ""flake white"" is used only by oil painters, and there's no indication in the study that they were referring to oil paints. Cooperstown is a well-respected institution, but as of now I'm sticking with the classic (Ralph Mayer). Flake white may get slightly yellowish after centuries, but nothing like the gross discoloration referred to in the paragraph above. If someone has more information on this, please mention it here; otherwise when I come back I'm going to delete that paragraph or water it down (no pun intended)."	0	0	0
054f99aaa5879276	That's my point. I looked for false positives or any feature that would distinguish these accounts, and there was none to be found. The unpleasant situation is that we had a user with a history of exactly this sort of problem with a set of circumstances, reported by users in good standing, that exactly matched sock puppetry. I had to make a difficult judgment call per all the available information, and the conclusion was a finding of sock puppetry. I have invited checkusers, and others, to review the report. Everything is available for inspection and comment. Talk	0	0	0
05500c9938844b46	Did you even look at my edit before reverting it? I did change it up as you wanted to say that Rex thinks it doesnt work. and as you said, it hits on many things that are also said elsewhere in the article, making it perfect for the lead. Just because it is stated elsewhere in the article by other sources doesn't mean we can also use this source. The more sources the better. I would suggest we both stop touching the article until you come up with a clear reason why it shouldn't be added. As I know all too well how this works, no one touches it in order to finish this dispute, and then the person who didn't want the information in the article will just stop discussing because they think they have won. and then revert whenever the page gets changed.	0	0	0
05501c529f0439c3	i found this article on crime in managua its from 2006 wich means its recent facts that need to be used for this section i didnt copyright i changed alot of thw phrases Managua the Epicenter of crime in Nicaragua Managua experienced a rise in violence and crime throughout 1990's. Violent crime in Managua is for various reasons such as political violence, Civil war crime and delinquency. Gangs in Managua are a widespread phenomenon that is growing fast. Currently managua has more than 110 gangs with more than 8,000 members. These gangsare responsible for 50% of all crimes in Nicaragua and 60% of all crimes in Managua. violence and gang warfare is prevalent.These gangs are responsible for theft, mugging, pick-pocketing they also have involvement in the drug trade among other criminal activities.[2] and this is the original one Managua, Nicaragua epicenter of crime in Nicaragua experienced rising levels of violence and criminality throughout 1990s 40% of all crimes in Nicaragua committed in Managua – half of these reported crimes considered violent nature of violence and violent crime shifts from political violence and civil war to crime and delinquency Pandillas – youth gangs – in Managua now a prevalent and widespread phenomenon – growing rapidly currently more than 110 pandillas with approximately 8,000 members concentrated in lower-class barrios – poverty and lack of opportunity drive membership territorially based in specific neighbourhoods defend territory as a source of identity and pride Lower class barrio in Managua Pandillas commit variety of crime, often employing firearms responsible for disproportionate share of criminal activity commit 50% of all crimes in Nicaragua and 60% of all crimes in Managua violence and gang warfare prevalent robbery, mugging, pick-pocketing and involvement in drug trade among other criminal activities and here is the link http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/focus/youth_gun/managua9_e.htm	0	0	0
05506d179b8a42b1	" I've decided to start a good Wikipedia account, so I can show you that I can do good to Wikipedia. Please accept my apology above, and I will create no more ""WackyWizzlepenis"" articles. "	0	0	0
0552d788c6c4695b	" Your submission at AfC Donegal County Council election, 2004 was accepted Donegal County Council election, 2004, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! x12345 "	0	0	0
0555281658565433	December 2008 (UTC) Well said, I had exactly the same from him for no good reason 22:37, 19	0	0	0
055553141f143980	. If you believe I've made this block in error you can request an unblock review from another administrator using the template (instructions at the link)	0	0	0
055599251e913abe	Architectural Influences I have read somewhere (alas forgotten source) that the oval office was influenced by a room in the now Italian Ambassadorial residence in Lucan, Ireland. Does anybody know if this is true?	0	0	0
05566a740b2b9ad4	There is definately a major difference between caucasian and white. Users slrubenstein and alun are definately taking a racist stance toward this article, and both sides can throw up rules and regs set by wikipedia to hide behind and attempt to justify your points of view (cited sources or not, it's obvious your point of view determines which sources you cite, and or choose not to), but this article as it exists is just wrong. I believe wikipedia would be better served by deleting this article, and adding a new sub-section in the races and caucasian articles if it this is not changed to reflect what 99.9% of the people on this earth consider a 'white person' to be, this 99.9% obviously not including alun & slrubenstein. When it comes down to it, the term 'white person' can't really be defined, it's technically not a race, and any references sited are going to be garbage, as you can find hundreds of them from what could be considered reliable sources that directly defy one another. All that could be done for this article would be to direct it towards a view that most people agree with, or delete it entirely, but as it currently exists, I say again it's a joke. You can cite all the references you want, and state all the wikipedia rules you want, you just can't understand that what you believe just isn't what an overwhelming majority of the rest of the human race does, and as I said before, there's no way of either side proving the case for either side here, as 'white people' don't scientifically exist. So, since you guys are obviously the type that will fight to the bitter end for some worthless cause, even though you have to know that most everyone disagrees with your understanding of what a 'white person' is, just do us all a favor and either delete this article (since there is no factual ground for either side to stand on), or just accept that the overwhelming majority of people see this differently from you, get over it, and let the majority rule on this article about a group of people that doesn't scientifically exist. /end commafest 2009	0	0	0
05566fed20751c92	Thanks for the note, Richard. I knew it was a road bridge, but it is called the Turnbridge Loco Lift Bridge in every reference I can find. (Nicholson Waterways guide, Kirkless MBC website, Waterscape.com, etc), and the name seems to stem from its shape, rather than its function. I have added a link from the map to your excellent photo.	0	0	0
05576c0e840f3d88	Receive Old Articles Hi, Would we still be able to receive his old articles posted in the past, and the one that was just posted yesterday? We were wondering if we could receive and retain those records for review. Thank you for your time.	0	0	0
05579b212760ff49	Fartsalot56 says f**k you motherclucker!!	1	1	1
0558008923868af0	" You cannot take a practice engaged in by a negligible proportion of all the males who live or have ever lived on this planet and imply that this is what men do everywhere. I have looked around and the other options I have encountered is ""bachelor hug"" which is both very rare and nonsensical, and ""pound hug"" which makes a lot more sense and seems about as popular as hip hop hug. As long as we mention both in the article I would have no problem with ""Pound hug"". By the way, why did my redirect fail? I was going to append an explanation but the servers were soooo slow I ran out of time and had to run to an appointment. "	0	0	0
05580098c38b66d0	" I've traced the origin of one of the disputed sentences myself. It seems the problem stems from multiple users whose first language is not English, who don't understand the need for sources, and who can't edit in accordance with WP:NPOV. At 20:18 July 23 adds: ""Ishihara stated he respects the French culture but he just pointed out the problem of French language."" POV, poor English, unsourced, and meaningless: what's the problem with the French language that causes problems for mathematicians? (Some of the world's best mathematicians are French.) At 19:45, August 2, , who seems to be French, changes it to: ""Ishihara stated he respects the French culture but he just pointed out his ignorance about french mathematicians and his stupidity."" POV, poor English, unencyclopedic, insulting, unsourced. At 00:02, August 11, changes it to: ""Ishihara then apologized by stating his apreciation for the French culture."" Unsourced and contains a spelling mistake (possibly just a typo). At 02:15, August 17, User:Hmib reverts to: ""Ishihara stated he respects the French culture but he just pointed out his ignorance about french mathematicians and his stupidity."" See above. Perhaps the dispute between FoC and Hmib could be reduced if you were both to supply sources for every edit that's likely to be challenged. Also, please bear in mind that this is the English Wikipedia, and edits must conform to a minimal standard of English. This is especially true when the edits are contentious and are leading to weeks-long edit wars. I'm leaving this on FoC's page too. (talk) 21:49, August 21, 2005 (UTC)"	0	0	0
05586b54dbe78f09	" Addressing: While ""Indian tribe"" is official US Gov't lingo, saying ""tribe"" twice in the first sentence and then again in the second is awkward, also ""the tribe"" is not a monolithic entity, but rather a collection of people - so maybe reword to say something like ""The Coeur d'Alene people once inhabited 3,500,000 acres (1,400,000 ha) in northern Idaho and Washington,[2][3] (And Montana, actually, note article on the tribe) but today, the only land controlled by the tribal nation is the Coeur d'Alene Reservation in Benewah and Kootenai counties, Idaho.[4]"" You don't have to use my wording, but you see how I am distinguishing land and people, though the two are, of course, closely intertwined. . Boomer! Second and third paragraphs jump around and need another copyedit. I'd put right up front that Johnson did the executive order but Congress never acted on it, then go on about how the tribe didn't accept it anyway? Keep the chronology clearer. (Interesting that the Coeur d'Alene article says nothing about this period, maybe finish here and add a bit to that article too... hmmm) From a VERY cursory review of the decision, it appears that gap between creation of the reservation and Idaho's statehood becomes significant in this case, so perhaps give us a bit of foreshadowing that this is not just a dry fact, but it's something that's going to matter. The section fails to draw out the significance of the info on the state park and mining, maybe add a wee bit to hint at why this will matter in the SCOTUS case."	0	0	0
0558f1dd8c98988d	The answer to that question has finally been found; Justin Timberlake is one of the artists that does that song; Gap Band nephew Snoop Dogg interpolates lyrics from Early in the Morning in the 2005 song Signs.	0	0	0
0559f0de5c90f55a	You must have the lowest IQ of anyone on wikipedia, I can't converse with a fool like you	1	0	1
055a44ec4805c558	Is this username appropriate?	0	0	0
055ae8b8cfbc32b7	" ""I am working on this page for school."" Wikipedia is not a free host. Put it on one of your own websites or one of these wikis. — RHaworth "	0	0	0
055b4607391970cc	" I read that quality article, reference number 3 where he states, ""it's not because I died in the 9/11 attacks that put my career on hold, it's because my financial backers pulled out"" He's obviously a genius. Also the team owner or whatever he was stated the ""the newton-john name goes a long way in motor racing as everyone knows who she is"" Read your own references before getting on your high horse. Go grab yourself a tube of Vagisil and fuck yourself.90.204.13.4 "	0	0	0
055c1a535aaea6d4	Klaus... Chris loves you. I tried the 'adm' and 'aks' and a random mexican answered the phone... goddammit, i'm gonna send flowers. don't freak out. 68.0.119.139	0	0	0
055c9cafcdb359f9	" Pseudonymous editing copied from an email received offline Hi, I'm not quite sure how this works, but your wrote in my deletion review, ""you say that your name and address are available, but your contributions to Wikipedia are pseudonymous."" Does this mean I hadn't registered? I did so last night, and not under a pseudonym as most people have. I always use my real name in signatures. And I don't know how to post to your talk page because there appears to be no ""post"" link. Thanks, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz [email protected] [email protected] Thanks for your message but I think perhaps my meaning was still unclear. Whether you register or not doesn't really matter since anyone can register under any name. I could go online and register a Wikipedia account as George W. Bush (at least, if it's not already taken). Wikipedia has no means to authenticate your identity independently. All that we know - all that we can know - is what you choose to claim about yourself. That's what I meant by pseudonymously - any registration, even if you say that it's your real name, is technically a pseudonym. It is not independently verified against some external identity database. And for the most part, that works out very well on Wikipedia. We want users and editors to establish themselves through their actions and to demonstrate their expertise through their edits, not by making claims to outside credentials. By the way, anyone could also register as Dennis Bathory-Kitzs. That trivial misspelling would be easily overlooked by readers but would still be accepted by the system. Such a person could sign their name the same way you do, attempt to mimic your pattern of speech (well, writing really) and make subtle edits just to discredit you. That, in fact, is a real problem for established editors of Wikipedia. When we find usernames that are suspiciously similar to established users, we look very carefully for signs of vandalism or deceit. Users who appear to have done something like that on purpose are generally banned from Wikipedia. But those are all manual checks. There is no system that can automatically detect or prevent it. Likewise, no one can inherently trust the email address. The way internet domains are set up, anyone could register bathory.org and create any email name they wanted. Like Wikipedia accounts, emails and internet domains are unverified against any external identity authority. And that's before you consider the problems of email spoofing and forgery - both of which are far easier and common today than any of us would like to admit. Most people are honest. But there are enough dishonest people out there that we have to build our systems and our procedures in such a way that it doesn't matter whether they are telling the truth about their identity or not. That's why Wikipedia has a policy against original research (which we mean as ""a contribution or assertion based on personal experience"") and why we never rely solely on self-published materials and why we bias our policy so strongly in favor of reliable sources such as websites owned by and operated by large, well-known organizations - organizations with both a vested interest in and the resources to find and stop spoofing. Sorry to bore you with all this but my non-Wikipedia profession is information security. The inherent problems of identity management and authentication occupy much of my waking hours. How can a bank know that you're really you? And how far can that trust be extended? Under what conditions can an assertion be treated as reliable? How do we balance that against the need to make systems and computers easy and accessible. Unfortunately, there are no easy answers short of establishing a national identity database - something which would be in great tension with my role as a privacy advocate. Anyway, I'll get off my soapbox now. Thanks for your message. To post to my Talk page, just go to the page and edit it like you would edit any page on Wikipedia. The most common technique is to use the little plus sign next to the ""edit this page"" tab at the top. That will automatically create a new section and give you a line to create a section header without having to know the wiki-markup symbols. You should also get in the habit of signing your posts on Talk pages. You can do that easily by ending your comment with four tildes (~~~~). When you save the page, the MediaWiki software will replace the tildes with your username and the date-timestamp. Again, welcome to Wikipedia. (talk) "	0	0	0
055eb49939be33e6	I always thought peperoncini were the small, really hot chili peppers that are used in e.g. pasta all'arrabbiata etc. In Sweden, peperoni refers to the larger, pickled chili peppers that are used as kebab toppings (and sometimes pizza...). Peperoncini is the diminutive of peperoni, right?	0	0	0
055eebbb431025e9	" Good lord. Could this discussion pissably [sic] stop any lower? Get a grip folks, try to remember we're writing an encyclopedia, not seeing who can piss the furthest. talk "	0	0	0
055f62f330c9b483	well, change it then.	0	0	0
0560bf9102ade91f	I'm not sure his being banned from an ID message board is all that relevant, (Shock! horror! Hal Fisher comes out in defense of CML!) but it is relevant to his arbcom case that others think he is a net kook too.	0	0	0
05621b61b9100d5f	, 9 June 2009 (UTC) They could be bluffing, or this could be a Joe Job. Unless there is technical evidence connecting a functionary to sock puppets, I don't think there's much to go on. Talk 22:59	0	0	0
05655aadedb5936d	" I really didn't expect it to ""fly."" Thanks for the affirmation. "	0	0	0
0565ec4a0732b644	Also, I can't seem to find you're second and third references.	0	0	0
0565fcebf5b16273	" Quoting from the article: ""Rubbish was thrown at her and the crowds jeered, in part because she dressed in expensive clothing which served to alienate her from those suffering the privations caused by the war."" and ""Windsor Castle (about 20 miles, 35 kilometres, west of central London)"" So, the views that you express are already represented in the article. It seems fair and well-balanced to me. Making it ""critical"" is not what wikipedia is about. We should not be a platform for political views, but an encyclopedia presenting facts. "	0	0	0
05674d53bc1e4518	Barek, why are you abu$ing the deletion function? You ju$t deleted a bunch of edit$ and page-move log$ that do not meet the criteria for deletion. I $uggest you rever$e your deletion$, or you will be de-$y$opped.	0	0	0
056791b78692a149	Hannibal Like I said earlier, the only thing I'd comment on is that the books section should be expanded...the bulk of the plots of Red Dragon and Silence are ignored, save for Lecter being captured and escaping. We don't need a CliffNotes of the novels, but we should mention how Lecter worked with both Graham and Clarice and how he was connected with Francis Dolarhyde. Again, a paragraph or two for each book would do.	0	0	0
05687bcb86751fc2	"::The CTMU is not passing itself off as an ""academic"" theory. It can't, because Langan is not a member of academia. But then again, a theory need not be academic to be notable. For example, print and television journalists and their readers and viewing audiences can deem things notable as well. Nor do academics have a monopoly on logical or factual correctness, scholarly integrity, or intellectual merit, except possibly in the well-indoctrinated minds of some academics themselves (and of course, their aspiring apprentices, whose eager anticipation of scholastic glory sometimes inflates their academic snobbery to blimpish proportions). Byrgenwulf complains that ""we chaps"" are not the sole arbiters of what belongs in the article. This is correct. To his credit, he invites others to tag his assertions. However, this is a bit specious, for having belatedly come to the realization that he has no relevant, verifiable assertions to make, he is now specializing in challenging the assertions of others. Thus, we now find him imperiously and rather comically demanding that every one of Langan's assertions receive a separate citation, when this is flatly unnecessary because the source material in which those assertions are made is already directly linked to the article. It is important for Byrgenwulf to understand that he has exactly the same burden of proof as his opponents. Not only must he provide a legitimate citation for anything he wishes to add to the article, but given that the article already links to ample source material, anything he wants to remove or qualify must be proven false, irrelevant, or non-neutral. Unfortunately, he hasn't yet been able to lock onto this signal. He still labors under the assumption that like some sort of Ultimate Bureaucrat, he can sit at his keyboard and demand an infinite amount of verification without verifying anything himself. By now, everyone involved in this matter has come to a stark realization: neither Byrgenwulf, nor any of his tiny but dedicated band of confederates, HAS any citations or other sources of verification for their own accusations. They are merely using the article, which is faithful to the material it cites, to prosecute their philosophical bias against its topic, the CTMU, which was deemed notable and newsworthy by several international periodicals and news networks. They do not like what the CTMU says; the article on the CTMU reports on what the CTMU says, and what Langan and the press say about the CTMU; hence, they do not like the article on the CTMU. This conflation of the article with the theory is reflected in Byrgenwulf's transparent strategy of attacking the theory through the article, attempting to dispose of the message by killing the messenger. Meanwhile, he seemingly fails to register the fact that he is himself in glaring violation of Wikipedia verifiability policy, and that his all-too-evident editorial bias is in massive violation of NPOV as well. Oozing contempt, Byrgenwulf has rumbled into the middle of the CTMU article with a load of summary demands, snide remarks, and self-righteous, factually worthless criticism...but not one relevant citation in hand! Nothing he says is verifiable; as we have now repeatedly seen, he cannot even be trusted on matters in which he claims to be an expert. This makes it very difficult, if not impossible, to take his demands seriously. "	0	0	0
0569a07e22b86f53	Siafu, I am getting access denied for GPS PPS. It says ERROR Access Denied Access Denied by security policy The security policy for your network prevents your request from being allowed at this time. Please contact your administrator if you feel this is incorrect. Is this a classified document?	0	0	0
056c4484d431f9bb	Hi Danqing, It is very nice to work with you:) Chenxi	0	0	0

0527d9c4ff997a3e

Why the hell did you fucking write that?! I can vandalize Wikipedia whenever I want!

1

0

1

0

1

0

05287ad5cb9e632f

English in this article? Is it just me or is English really pretty bad in this article?

0

052a2dd0e76e2370

hello sir yunshi, sorry,i dont know sitush account used by multiple persons.please sir,for mutharaiyar articles i gave lot of reliable sources..please undo previous day deletion...

0

052a64799702b6b6

Summaries Sorry bout that... I'll try to remember better. Mahalo. Psst... love the smiley>

0

052b1ed37789460f

Hi Robert..hv asked the author to give a proper copyright permission..in the format as required by wikipedia. Will get it in a couple of days and send it across to the relevant authorities...Ravi

0

052bc2cd53a2320f

(UTC) I think these are some very good questions, and until they are addressed by a professional, the article needs to be in dispute. Are there 60 species, or 61? Could there only be 59? These are questions of significance. 18:43, 14 November 2008

0

052d61f9a33e209a

" Not done: It currently reads ""at least 5.5 million"", and in the section on The Holocaust, it reads ""5.5 to six million"", with references. I'm not sure what the issue is. (talk - contribs) "

0

052d9243793d9efd

Hi, 牛岩, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Introduction to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article Simplified Manual of Style Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. However, there is a small issue with your username. As it is in a non-Latin alphabet script it may not display correctly for many other users. Although usernames like yours are not prohibited, Wikipedia's signature guideline and username policy encourage you, as a courtesy to other users, to alter your signature so that it also includes a transliteration of your username using Latin characters, so others can see it correctly. For the how-to of tailoring your username, please see WP:CUSTOMSIG. Thanks, and feel free to message me about anything. ترجمة | թարգմանություն | tərcümə | пераклад | অনুবাদ | превод | 翻译 | თარგმანი | μετάφραση | અનુવાદ | תרגום | अनुवाद | 翻訳 | ಅನುವಾದ | បកប្រែ | 번역 | ການແປພາສາ | превод | भाषांतर करणे] | ترجمه | перевод | превод | மொழிபெயர்ப்பு | అనువాద | การแปล | переклад | dịch | | יבערזעצונג

0

052f696b2d4a4491

" A tag has been placed on Beezwax, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please don't remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you've created yourself; it's considered vandalism. You can use the tag as specified. If you have any questions, leave a note on my talk page. "

0

052fb1def4fe4790

My policy on not English articles if no one else has already tagged them: delete on sight - A1 no context will do - I cannot identify the articles subject! and then leave a message for the author such as this one - short but sufficient. — RHaworth

0

052fbdf4ce567988

My side of the story Attention, douchebags and douchetees. I have been labled as a Terrorist on this site. BULL TO THE SHIT! I simply have a vast amount of knowlege on a wide range of topics. Scjessey, for example did not mention he is a fucking douchebag on his article. So I had to ammend this. I was simply trying to spread the truth. ALLLALLALALALALALAlAlALAALALAALALALALALAl. Sorry. I have to do that every 5 minutes or I go to hell. ALLALALALALALALALALALALALALALALLALALALALALLLALALALA ALLAH 4EVER!

1

0

1

0

1

0

052fd5daae4f7b54

your support for Chris Lawson Are you sure you want to support this guy? Look at his source/quote for making the Red Baron jewish. read the discussion page on it. See the opposers views on his request page. It scares me. JohnHistory http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Manfred_von_Richthofen http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Clawson

0

052ff0b0b4e0adcf

You blocked me before I even made a second offense.

0

0530479783261b14

The particular section lists what has been claimed in rebuttal to the code theft charge. That the claims regarding the significance of C to C++ translation and 64 bit conversion seem spurious, false or dubious to C/C++ programmers are acknowledged. That the Medievia web page makes blatantly false statements about dates, the origination of other muds, and the significance of the above I also acknowledge. I don't believe the article section is about uncovering the truth of their claims. The only fact necessary to presenting that viewpoint is that they've claimed it. Also presenting a lengthy history of public proclamations and announcements by the games principals which contradict their own official web history page is beyond the scope, I think, of what most people care about.

0

0532eeee474b2c6d

I have added some information on Melina's run in other wrestling promotions, I still need to add some more about her run in OVW, feel free to edit the information

0

053315d473d5f204

Google search predominantly shows the mixed martial arts over the football player.

0

053378b5c8d76936

" No it wasn't scrapped. Alicia's version remains as the original and 50 Cent's version is just a sample of it. Also, her version charted in the US and received plenty of coverage enough to have its own separate article. Regards. —21 "

0

053391f22acedcd3

Conflict of interest? Your one-and-only, quite large edit to Exhilway strongly suggests a conflict of interest to me. If so, please disclose this conflict of interest on your user page. Additional information can be found here.

0

0533c68b6e61e5ee

Arji, what makes you think this assertion is mistaken? It is not my assertion, it is the conclusion of this agencies report, taken to be reputable enough to be run by several respectable news carriers around the world. Naming me a troll is a classy touch, and calling for all dialogue with me to cease should be grounds for your indef banning from wikipedia. The fact that you and Kim don't believe the conclusions does not matter, the evidence passes WP:V and WP:RS. The evidence has been released to the media and no-one of repute (That's not you Kim BTW) has challenged the validity or accuracy of the study. The fact that the study doesn't include Chinas massive underground coal mine fires only helps the conclusions of the report.

0

05342a65eab40629

" Firstly, some of the examples you used were from the personal attack pages...maybe you should read your own posts? Also, the reason I decided they were inane and decided to ignore them was because they did not directly apply to what I had said. Perhaps they applied to the numerous inferences that you made in reference to what I said but they did not apply to what I said and meant. Perhaps you could try not to infer or assume what I mean and try not to take offense so easily. I am respecting the basic rules of Wikipedia, but I also exploited ""loop holes"" in the rules. So if you want to include what I did in the rules then do so, but you should state what you want and not infer your own meaning. And I'm so upset because you and several other people have been complete and total assholes to me and to another person who tried to post this same page. You asked that we do something, i.e. explain the significance of the clan, etc, and we did but you deleted it anyway. And then you ask for more stuff and you give it to us. Also, one of the pages I read on here says that the information has to be verifiable but not the truth...well what kind of bullshit is that? If this is truly an encyclopedia then dont you state the truth? Also, if I go and post some article some other place rather than the clans home page then I can site that and it becomes verifiable right? If you say no, then this is just another example of something that is not explicitly stated and a loop hole that people can exploit. Before you go around messing with other peoples posts maybe you could get your rules and priorities straight. "

0

05347a9955ff8575

":::::::Understood. And just wondering, why is this section called RfA? I am far from having enough experience to become an admin, nor do I have any wish to become one currently. Triple M "

0

05365218ecab2924

There are 4 proposed theories and none of them weighs more than the others. Either all of them should be included and summarized in the conclusion, or the generic current version that states the following should be kept: Although the actual circumstances and timing of the physical destruction of the Library remain uncertain, it is however clear that by the Eighth century A.D., the Library was no longer a significant institution and had ceased to function in any important capacity.

0

0536d2f25f58e41d

because you blocked me

0

05372fd007b996a7

No problem, the other thing is that when I read medical pages, I start to think I have the same symptoms - I wonder of other people are like that.

0

053820f28e2f3b8a

" Elelland Hello Humus I am sorry if I have placed this note in the wrong spot. I m very inexperienced with Wikipedia. I was enthralled by Wikipedia. Initially. That is until I met Eleland. I noticed that you had some interesting discussions with Eleland. Eleland engineered a small article which I contributed some information to be deleted. He organised a ""kangaroo court"" made duplicitous unfounded claims and then set up a false consensus. The Article was on Ed O'Loughlin Fairfax publishing MidEast correspondent. The said individual has a unfortunate habit of mixing reporting and commentary. He was amongst the candidates for this year's HR.com dishonest reporter award - despite being in the Australia only catchment area - so you can imagine the quality of his journalism. Anyway Eleland did a great job of protecting him and got the article deleted. So I studied Eleland a little. I've looked at over 100 of his posts on the Arab Israel conflict. More than 95 were directly anti-Israel. His modus has been generally to unfairly rubbish the references of the pro-Israel side. In this way he has undermined many many articles. Personally I don't care what his opinion is, but when he uses his editorial power and influence at Wikipedia to falsely invalidate, delete, manipulate etc. I think there is a problem. Wikipedia is, I am afraid, beginning to read like Eleland wrote the script. Who is Eleland? What power does he actually have? Can anything be done? Adon Emmet If you post a reply here I will contact here or even by e-mail"

0

053825bca5fbd47e

I see no evidence that the expected (required?) merge notice () was ever posted to the page in question. This casts serious doubts on the legitimacy of any supposed consensus obtained in that discussion, especially if the other articles were likewise not tagged appropriately during the discussion.

0

0538591a8ed48f70

" Person of interest little did he know that ""Person of interest"" its a TV show mystery solved 72.185.61.209 "

0

0538a7ea5a63af6b

it would be good to know who is funding this

0

0538fb8b2eef622e

Moral Defense, you slimy toad you.

1

0

1

0

0539f36907945292

Ta. Well I still think there might be some against this, I don't know if it offsets any numbering of the films, so I was hesitant to change it straight away. I don't blame anyone for questioning this, because this is the first thing I looked at when I saw the list on their website...

0

053b24b25f48a5e7

Pursuant to the Wikipedia's policy on biography of living persons I have removed parts of this biopiece that impugn Andrew Li's integrity, impartiality, and honesty as a judge without citation. The author of those parts claimed, without support, that they are quoting from the South China Morning Post. However, as participants of civilized discussions would immediately recognize, simply saying that your source is from the South China Morning Post without giving us the date and page number is not a citation.

0

053ceb31fc1a90a8

Comments on password hacking I really don't think it was appropriate to talk about your issues about your password being stolen on a completely unrelated subject.As the header said, it was only supposed to be a discussion about improvements to the pet food crisis article, and your comments should have been deleted. Just because you were careless enough to leave your password for someone to steal, you do not need to annoy other people with your frustrations and tell everyone to panic, the world is not coming to an end as you keep exagerating, and Im sure most other people arent stupid enough to lose their password.But like

0

053d05eec276cb75

You did not even know what HE wrote on the deletion log for Barbados–France relations, got to it, and you will see that HE has cursed. And now you are taking me (a victim) to a hostile situation!

0

053e1010a3533c3d

:Janus Hasildor A tag has been placed on Janus Hasildor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template to the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. babble

0

053e8f0e22bbc4bc

What is your deal? Making apparently random reverts?

0

053eef41f1eee325

It is merely a decorative indicator and should be on its own line to appear properly.

0

053faf561066632f

Hey now, please assume good faith. His middle name is indeed Lorraine (if you go to Madison Square Garden it's on the plaque that's dedicated to him), and I could have sworn when I read the article it corroborated that. I was mistaken on the latter.

0

05400f98d9a7ef8d

" (UTC) It's common use is not as a proper noun. The dictionary article referenced in this article talks about the dispute between horse breeders, and ""people who are not in the horse-breeding business"". Wikipedia is not an encyclopaedia for horse breeders. It is for the public. 23:51, 6 June 2010"

0

054032f0cb3ecd35

You're biased. I made it a point since I signed up here that none of you exist.

1

0

054072914a17434b

Yeah, they're both puff-pieces written with obvious COI. One puff article is better than 2. The Dissident Aggressor

0

05421783947fcc50

Hi good to see you deleting stuff on the speedy deletion backlog! Have you rescued anything?

0

054270201da7b6c8

Hurricane Floyd Such a pretty user talk page, I don't like ruining it by writing all over it. Well, anyways, I saw that you were successful at getting Hurricane Dennis to featured status. There is another hurricane-related article up for peer review at Wikipedia:Peer review/Hurricane Floyd. Would you mind taking a look and offering some advice?

0

05434c37cd87a525

" In that case, I'm truly sorry. I obviously interpreted it wrongly. Cheers, "

0

05437d98fba6a0e9

appearance of Mizrahi Jews

0

0543ff4f1921973d

" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~~ [t - c] If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices."

0

054498d7d5fc2f85

Hello Mr. Gordon. I didn't feel like waiting until 2009 or one yar later to appeal. I would like to sincerely apologize, and I want to know if you are willing to accept these conditions. I don't want to be viewed as a threat, as I am quite nearby. t

0

05452c3ec6ac1859

well fag... block me. block me?! oh the world will shurly end! come off your high horse. i'll say what i want about you. if you continue bashing me then i will just have to post complaints about you on EVERY b log and forum i can find. every chat room will be filled with how Redfarmer (did your mom come up with that name?) is untrustworthy. if you block me i can always find info on another site. a site where they don't allow people (or FREAKS) like you to delete pages on a whim! so you gonna block me? ban me? go ahead. but be warned... without being able to edit pages. i can't help you by giving you instructions on how to change your diapers. sorry. leonhart178

1

0

1

0

1

0

0545ffcf70c9c99c

He is director of the Tate. Done.

0

054608ae9fa4b9cd

What I was referring to is The Goon Show. The Pink Oboe was the main ne'er do well spy character in one of the shows. My old decrepit mind won't allow me to remember which one, but it will come back to me eventually.

0

05465495f971fe78

Licensing issues In 2007, you created Malaysian Federal Roads System by copying from at least one other Wikipedia article. Where did it come from? If the source article is not identified, we can't use the text. Wikipedia's contributors do not release their material in public domain, but retain the right to credit for their contributions. (talk)

0

0546acba02a28caf

If the LAW is a single use weapon, isn't this a disadvtage as compared to the original Bazooka (granted it does not leave a smoke trail and has no recoil).

0

0546f3319bc782c5

" Some baklava for you! Thanks for your copyedit of The Long, Hot Summermuch appreciated! "

0

05476e7b7750269d

Wow J Delanoy, you must really love Brit Hume and hate science!!!!!

0

0547d66f6e35a3c5

Link: Age of Mythology Heaven Added link to Age of Mythology heaven. It has loads more info than can ever be described on one wiki page. Also, is a place to go for support for the game, as developers have abandoned it.

0

0547e12ce03948d3

"== Citation == The first 'citation needed' tag at the end of the fourth paragraph of the 'First theatre: Theatre Royal, Bridges Street (1663)' section is covered in Walter Macqueen-Pope's 1945 book ""Theatre Royal, Drury Lane, publisher Allen, page 33. If you wish me to type the wording here so you can verify, please let me know. Thanks. - Chat "

0

05485fc540f053f2

" Friend, no problem with me. But just look at the discussion page and history of edits when ""suspicious"" persons are added. Croats or Serbs will claim he wasn't Bosniak but Croat or Serb, Bosniaks will denie and so on. But I'm glad you proposed Tvrtko, I'm considering to later add total number of votes, so we will see.fuchs "

0

05497ed19512b588

Considering the legal issues surrounding ROMs, it would be a bad idea.. I'm not sure which one, but i'm fairly sure that posting the ROM would violate some Wikipedia rule..

0

0549926bbe6f4247

" The subject of the ongoing attempts by politically biased Wikipedia editors to suppress any mention of Neil deGrasse Tyson's embarrassment has prompted widespread derision from the political right. ""[B]logs and conservative opinion pieces"" may not be reliable for statements of fact (see [WP:BIAS]), but if they are well-known, high-traffic, non-fringe, etc. they (National Review, Volokh Conspiracy, Weekly Standard. etc., etc.) ABSOLUTELY establish the existence of a controversy. Partisan dismissals of the significance of the controversy from the other side of the political spectrum subtract nothing from that fact. "

0

0549d0b39df651db

False Friends of the Slavist I recommend you talk with Miloš Rančić about this. He studies slavistic.

0

054b1b0019a6bd9c

" A barnstar for you! The Barnstar of Diligence of stalking people I just had a chance to see what you've done to the high-speed trading, and keeping i one sided to the finacial industry. greak work stalker bo "

0

054b37be76678daa

I'm sorry that I must say this. I have never come across a more idiotic editor on Wikipedia. Congratulations on making it to the top of my list. I mean that in a congratulatory sense entirely; in no way is it meant to offend or sound sarcastic. I wouldn't call you an editor though. You're more of a pollutant to this project and one with extreme perversion of perception. Please reread the discussion at the talk page. Based on what you last posted there it is painfully obvious that you ignored, or did not comprehend, much of what I tried explaining to you multiple times at that talk page.

0

1

0

054b74afe8718a46

As far as I know there were no warrants of arrest for Thomas Jefferson from the British Crown. There is nothing in the writings of Thomas Jefferson that states he was committing treason and could be hung. Jefferson, Washingtion, and Adams, according to Ferling (2000) believed they were slaves to the British government, not having any rights. They did not view themselves as outlaw rebels, rather, they wanted to be free to make their own laws that protected white people. Franklin apparently is the only Founding Father who mentioned being hung. Was Jefferson in the room at the time Franklin made this statement?

0

054c3e503771ece0

" My harrassment of you? How ironic… 05:12, September 6, 2005 (UTC)"

0

054dea7c4454fb5d

Great discussion point Jimbo, although I don't think discussion is actually required, the foundation should be able to just do this without the support of the users that are disputing the edits. In really difficult disputed issues I agree the wikimedia Foundation could hire experienced editors, although I wouldn't support any wikipedia connected interviewers, use and pay someone totally independent - independent notable reporters to interview and report on the problematic content issue and report that in a wp:rs source thus giving full independent closure to the dispute.

0

054f92b9b3674bf2

" Misleading reference to study? In the section on lead paint in art (which I largely wrote), someone added the following: ""Lead paint will often become discolored over long periods of time. This is due to the reaction of the lead carbonate in the paint with traces of hydrogen sulfide in the air and with acids, often from fingerprints. [2] As a result, many older works of art that used lead paint now show some discoloration."" As I found this surprising, I went and carefully read the study being cited. Their research seemed to refer only to lead in aqueous media on paper, although that wasn't absolutely clear. But lead paint is almost never used that way! Artists working in transparent watercolor (aquarelle) don't usually use white paint, or just occasionally a bit of ""Chinese White"" (not lead) to make corrections. And opaque watercolors (gouache) and acrylic (polymer) artist's paints typically use titanium dioxide or (rarely) zinc white, but never lead. Normally ""flake white"" is used only by oil painters, and there's no indication in the study that they were referring to oil paints. Cooperstown is a well-respected institution, but as of now I'm sticking with the classic (Ralph Mayer). Flake white may get *slightly* yellowish after centuries, but nothing like the gross discoloration referred to in the paragraph above. If someone has more information on this, please mention it here; otherwise when I come back I'm going to delete that paragraph or water it down (no pun intended)."

0

054f99aaa5879276

That's my point. I looked for false positives or any feature that would distinguish these accounts, and there was none to be found. The unpleasant situation is that we had a user with a history of exactly this sort of problem with a set of circumstances, reported by users in good standing, that exactly matched sock puppetry. I had to make a difficult judgment call per all the available information, and the conclusion was a finding of sock puppetry. I have invited checkusers, and others, to review the report. Everything is available for inspection and comment. Talk

0

05500c9938844b46

Did you even look at my edit before reverting it? I did change it up as you wanted to say that Rex thinks it doesnt work. and as you said, it hits on many things that are also said elsewhere in the article, making it perfect for the lead. Just because it is stated elsewhere in the article by other sources doesn't mean we can also use this source. The more sources the better. I would suggest we both stop touching the article until you come up with a clear reason why it shouldn't be added. As I know all too well how this works, no one touches it in order to finish this dispute, and then the person who didn't want the information in the article will just stop discussing because they think they have won. and then revert whenever the page gets changed.

0

05501c529f0439c3

i found this article on crime in managua its from 2006 wich means its recent facts that need to be used for this section i didnt copyright i changed alot of thw phrases Managua the Epicenter of crime in Nicaragua Managua experienced a rise in violence and crime throughout 1990's. Violent crime in Managua is for various reasons such as political violence, Civil war crime and delinquency. Gangs in Managua are a widespread phenomenon that is growing fast. Currently managua has more than 110 gangs with more than 8,000 members. These gangsare responsible for 50% of all crimes in Nicaragua and 60% of all crimes in Managua. violence and gang warfare is prevalent.These gangs are responsible for theft, mugging, pick-pocketing they also have involvement in the drug trade among other criminal activities.[2] and this is the original one Managua, Nicaragua epicenter of crime in Nicaragua experienced rising levels of violence and criminality throughout 1990s 40% of all crimes in Nicaragua committed in Managua – half of these reported crimes considered violent nature of violence and violent crime shifts from political violence and civil war to crime and delinquency Pandillas – youth gangs – in Managua now a prevalent and widespread phenomenon – growing rapidly currently more than 110 pandillas with approximately 8,000 members concentrated in lower-class barrios – poverty and lack of opportunity drive membership territorially based in specific neighbourhoods defend territory as a source of identity and pride Lower class barrio in Managua Pandillas commit variety of crime, often employing firearms responsible for disproportionate share of criminal activity commit 50% of all crimes in Nicaragua and 60% of all crimes in Managua violence and gang warfare prevalent robbery, mugging, pick-pocketing and involvement in drug trade among other criminal activities and here is the link http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/focus/youth_gun/managua9_e.htm

0

05506d179b8a42b1

" I've decided to start a good Wikipedia account, so I can show you that I can do good to Wikipedia. Please accept my apology above, and I will create no more ""WackyWizzlepenis"" articles. "

0

0552d788c6c4695b

" Your submission at AfC Donegal County Council election, 2004 was accepted Donegal County Council election, 2004, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! x12345 "

0

0555281658565433

December 2008 (UTC) Well said, I had exactly the same from him for no good reason 22:37, 19

0

055553141f143980

. If you believe I've made this block in error you can request an unblock review from another administrator using the template (instructions at the link)

0

055599251e913abe

Architectural Influences I have read somewhere (alas forgotten source) that the oval office was influenced by a room in the now Italian Ambassadorial residence in Lucan, Ireland. Does anybody know if this is true?

0

05566a740b2b9ad4

There is definately a major difference between caucasian and white. Users slrubenstein and alun are definately taking a racist stance toward this article, and both sides can throw up rules and regs set by wikipedia to hide behind and attempt to justify your points of view (cited sources or not, it's obvious your point of view determines which sources you cite, and or choose not to), but this article as it exists is just wrong. I believe wikipedia would be better served by deleting this article, and adding a new sub-section in the races and caucasian articles if it this is not changed to reflect what 99.9% of the people on this earth consider a 'white person' to be, this 99.9% obviously not including alun & slrubenstein. When it comes down to it, the term 'white person' can't really be defined, it's technically not a race, and any references sited are going to be garbage, as you can find hundreds of them from what could be considered reliable sources that directly defy one another. All that could be done for this article would be to direct it towards a view that most people agree with, or delete it entirely, but as it currently exists, I say again it's a joke. You can cite all the references you want, and state all the wikipedia rules you want, you just can't understand that what you believe just isn't what an overwhelming majority of the rest of the human race does, and as I said before, there's no way of either side proving the case for either side here, as 'white people' don't scientifically exist. So, since you guys are obviously the type that will fight to the bitter end for some worthless cause, even though you have to know that most everyone disagrees with your understanding of what a 'white person' is, just do us all a favor and either delete this article (since there is no factual ground for either side to stand on), or just accept that the overwhelming majority of people see this differently from you, get over it, and let the majority rule on this article about a group of people that doesn't scientifically exist. /end commafest 2009

0

05566fed20751c92

Thanks for the note, Richard. I knew it was a road bridge, but it is called the Turnbridge Loco Lift Bridge in every reference I can find. (Nicholson Waterways guide, Kirkless MBC website, Waterscape.com, etc), and the name seems to stem from its shape, rather than its function. I have added a link from the map to your excellent photo.

0

05576c0e840f3d88

Receive Old Articles Hi, Would we still be able to receive his old articles posted in the past, and the one that was just posted yesterday? We were wondering if we could receive and retain those records for review. Thank you for your time.

0

05579b212760ff49

Fartsalot56 says f**k you motherclucker!!

1

0

1

0

1

0

0558008923868af0

" You cannot take a practice engaged in by a negligible proportion of all the males who live or have ever lived on this planet and imply that this is what men do everywhere. I have looked around and the other options I have encountered is ""bachelor hug"" which is both very rare and nonsensical, and ""pound hug"" which makes a lot more sense and seems about as popular as hip hop hug. As long as we mention both in the article I would have no problem with ""Pound hug"". By the way, why did my redirect fail? I was going to append an explanation but the servers were soooo slow I ran out of time and had to run to an appointment. "

0

05580098c38b66d0

" I've traced the origin of one of the disputed sentences myself. It seems the problem stems from multiple users whose first language is not English, who don't understand the need for sources, and who can't edit in accordance with WP:NPOV. At 20:18 July 23 adds: ""Ishihara stated he respects the French culture but he just pointed out the problem of French language."" POV, poor English, unsourced, and meaningless: what's the problem with the French language that causes problems for mathematicians? (Some of the world's best mathematicians are French.) At 19:45, August 2, , who seems to be French, changes it to: ""Ishihara stated he respects the French culture but he just pointed out his ignorance about french mathematicians and his stupidity."" POV, poor English, unencyclopedic, insulting, unsourced. At 00:02, August 11, changes it to: ""Ishihara then apologized by stating his apreciation for the French culture."" Unsourced and contains a spelling mistake (possibly just a typo). At 02:15, August 17, User:Hmib reverts to: ""Ishihara stated he respects the French culture but he just pointed out his ignorance about french mathematicians and his stupidity."" See above. Perhaps the dispute between FoC and Hmib could be reduced if you were both to supply sources for every edit that's likely to be challenged. Also, please bear in mind that this is the English Wikipedia, and edits must conform to a minimal standard of English. This is especially true when the edits are contentious and are leading to weeks-long edit wars. I'm leaving this on FoC's page too. (talk) 21:49, August 21, 2005 (UTC)"

0

05586b54dbe78f09

" Addressing: While ""Indian tribe"" is official US Gov't lingo, saying ""tribe"" twice in the first sentence and then again in the second is awkward, also ""the tribe"" is not a monolithic entity, but rather a collection of people - so maybe reword to say something like ""The Coeur d'Alene people once inhabited 3,500,000 acres (1,400,000 ha) in northern Idaho and Washington,[2][3] (And Montana, actually, note article on the tribe) but today, the only land controlled by the tribal nation is the Coeur d'Alene Reservation in Benewah and Kootenai counties, Idaho.[4]"" You don't have to use my wording, but you see how I am distinguishing land and people, though the two are, of course, closely intertwined. . Boomer! Second and third paragraphs jump around and need another copyedit. I'd put right up front that Johnson did the executive order but Congress never acted on it, then go on about how the tribe didn't accept it anyway? Keep the chronology clearer. (Interesting that the Coeur d'Alene article says nothing about this period, maybe finish here and add a bit to that article too... hmmm) From a VERY cursory review of the decision, it appears that gap between creation of the reservation and Idaho's statehood becomes significant in this case, so perhaps give us a bit of foreshadowing that this is not just a dry fact, but it's something that's going to matter. The section fails to draw out the significance of the info on the state park and mining, maybe add a wee bit to hint at why this will matter in the SCOTUS case."

0

0558f1dd8c98988d

The answer to that question has finally been found; Justin Timberlake is one of the artists that does that song; Gap Band nephew Snoop Dogg interpolates lyrics from Early in the Morning in the 2005 song Signs.

0

0559f0de5c90f55a

You must have the lowest IQ of anyone on wikipedia, I can't converse with a fool like you

1

0

1

0

055a44ec4805c558

Is this username appropriate?

0

055ae8b8cfbc32b7

" ""I am working on this page for school."" Wikipedia is not a free host. Put it on one of your own websites or one of these wikis. — RHaworth "

0

055b4607391970cc

" I read that quality article, reference number 3 where he states, ""it's not because I died in the 9/11 attacks that put my career on hold, it's because my financial backers pulled out"" He's obviously a genius. Also the team owner or whatever he was stated the ""the newton-john name goes a long way in motor racing as everyone knows who she is"" Read your own references before getting on your high horse. Go grab yourself a tube of Vagisil and fuck yourself.90.204.13.4 "

0

055c1a535aaea6d4

Klaus... Chris loves you. I tried the 'adm' and 'aks' and a random mexican answered the phone... goddammit, i'm gonna send flowers. don't freak out. 68.0.119.139

0

055c9cafcdb359f9

" Pseudonymous editing copied from an email received offline Hi, I'm not quite sure how this works, but your wrote in my deletion review, ""you say that your name and address are available, but your contributions to Wikipedia are pseudonymous."" Does this mean I hadn't registered? I did so last night, and not under a pseudonym as most people have. I always use my real name in signatures. And I don't know how to post to your talk page because there appears to be no ""post"" link. Thanks, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz [email protected] [email protected] Thanks for your message but I think perhaps my meaning was still unclear. Whether you register or not doesn't really matter since anyone can register under any name. I could go online and register a Wikipedia account as George W. Bush (at least, if it's not already taken). Wikipedia has no means to authenticate your identity independently. All that we know - all that we can know - is what you choose to claim about yourself. That's what I meant by pseudonymously - any registration, even if you say that it's your real name, is technically a pseudonym. It is not independently verified against some external identity database. And for the most part, that works out very well on Wikipedia. We want users and editors to establish themselves through their actions and to demonstrate their expertise through their edits, not by making claims to outside credentials. By the way, anyone could also register as Dennis Bathory-Kitzs. That trivial misspelling would be easily overlooked by readers but would still be accepted by the system. Such a person could sign their name the same way you do, attempt to mimic your pattern of speech (well, writing really) and make subtle edits just to discredit you. That, in fact, is a real problem for established editors of Wikipedia. When we find usernames that are suspiciously similar to established users, we look very carefully for signs of vandalism or deceit. Users who appear to have done something like that on purpose are generally banned from Wikipedia. But those are all manual checks. There is no system that can automatically detect or prevent it. Likewise, no one can inherently trust the email address. The way internet domains are set up, anyone could register bathory.org and create any email name they wanted. Like Wikipedia accounts, emails and internet domains are unverified against any external identity authority. And that's before you consider the problems of email spoofing and forgery - both of which are far easier and common today than any of us would like to admit. Most people are honest. But there are enough dishonest people out there that we have to build our systems and our procedures in such a way that it doesn't matter whether they are telling the truth about their identity or not. That's why Wikipedia has a policy against original research (which we mean as ""a contribution or assertion based on personal experience"") and why we never rely solely on self-published materials and why we bias our policy so strongly in favor of reliable sources such as websites owned by and operated by large, well-known organizations - organizations with both a vested interest in and the resources to find and stop spoofing. Sorry to bore you with all this but my non-Wikipedia profession is information security. The inherent problems of identity management and authentication occupy much of my waking hours. How can a bank know that you're really you? And how far can that trust be extended? Under what conditions can an assertion be treated as reliable? How do we balance that against the need to make systems and computers easy and accessible. Unfortunately, there are no easy answers short of establishing a national identity database - something which would be in great tension with my role as a privacy advocate. Anyway, I'll get off my soapbox now. Thanks for your message. To post to my Talk page, just go to the page and edit it like you would edit any page on Wikipedia. The most common technique is to use the little plus sign next to the ""edit this page"" tab at the top. That will automatically create a new section and give you a line to create a section header without having to know the wiki-markup symbols. You should also get in the habit of signing your posts on Talk pages. You can do that easily by ending your comment with four tildes (~~~~). When you save the page, the MediaWiki software will replace the tildes with your username and the date-timestamp. Again, welcome to Wikipedia. (talk) "

0

055eb49939be33e6

I always thought peperoncini were the small, really hot chili peppers that are used in e.g. pasta all'arrabbiata etc. In Sweden, peperoni refers to the larger, pickled chili peppers that are used as kebab toppings (and sometimes pizza...). Peperoncini is the diminutive of peperoni, right?

0

055eebbb431025e9

" Good lord. Could this discussion pissably [sic] stop any lower? Get a grip folks, try to remember we're writing an encyclopedia, not seeing who can piss the furthest. talk "

0

055f62f330c9b483

well, change it then.

0

0560bf9102ade91f

I'm not sure his being banned from an ID message board is all that relevant, (Shock! horror! Hal Fisher comes out in defense of CML!) but it is relevant to his arbcom case that others think he is a net kook too.

0

05621b61b9100d5f

, 9 June 2009 (UTC) They could be bluffing, or this could be a Joe Job. Unless there is technical evidence connecting a functionary to sock puppets, I don't think there's much to go on. Talk 22:59

0

05655aadedb5936d

" I really didn't expect it to ""fly."" Thanks for the affirmation. "

0

0565ec4a0732b644

Also, I can't seem to find you're second and third references.

0

0565fcebf5b16273

" Quoting from the article: ""Rubbish was thrown at her and the crowds jeered, in part because she dressed in expensive clothing which served to alienate her from those suffering the privations caused by the war."" and ""Windsor Castle (about 20 miles, 35 kilometres, west of central London)"" So, the views that you express are already represented in the article. It seems fair and well-balanced to me. Making it ""critical"" is not what wikipedia is about. We should not be a platform for political views, but an encyclopedia presenting facts. "

0

05674d53bc1e4518

Barek, why are you abu$ing the deletion function? You ju$t deleted a bunch of edit$ and page-move log$ that do not meet the criteria for deletion. I $uggest you rever$e your deletion$, or you will be de-$y$opped.

0

056791b78692a149

Hannibal Like I said earlier, the only thing I'd comment on is that the books section should be expanded...the bulk of the plots of Red Dragon and Silence are ignored, save for Lecter being captured and escaping. We don't need a CliffNotes of the novels, but we should mention how Lecter worked with both Graham and Clarice and how he was connected with Francis Dolarhyde. Again, a paragraph or two for each book would do.

0

05687bcb86751fc2

"::The CTMU is not passing itself off as an ""academic"" theory. It can't, because Langan is not a member of academia. But then again, a theory need not be academic to be notable. For example, print and television journalists and their readers and viewing audiences can deem things notable as well. Nor do academics have a monopoly on logical or factual correctness, scholarly integrity, or intellectual merit, except possibly in the well-indoctrinated minds of some academics themselves (and of course, their aspiring apprentices, whose eager anticipation of scholastic glory sometimes inflates their academic snobbery to blimpish proportions). Byrgenwulf complains that ""we chaps"" are not the sole arbiters of what belongs in the article. This is correct. To his credit, he invites others to tag his assertions. However, this is a bit specious, for having belatedly come to the realization that he has no relevant, verifiable assertions to make, he is now specializing in challenging the assertions of others. Thus, we now find him imperiously and rather comically demanding that every one of Langan's assertions receive a separate citation, when this is flatly unnecessary because the source material in which those assertions are made is already directly linked to the article. It is important for Byrgenwulf to understand that he has exactly the same burden of proof as his opponents. Not only must he provide a legitimate citation for anything he wishes to add to the article, but given that the article already links to ample source material, anything he wants to remove or qualify must be proven false, irrelevant, or non-neutral. Unfortunately, he hasn't yet been able to lock onto this signal. He still labors under the assumption that like some sort of Ultimate Bureaucrat, he can sit at his keyboard and demand an infinite amount of verification without verifying anything himself. By now, everyone involved in this matter has come to a stark realization: neither Byrgenwulf, nor any of his tiny but dedicated band of confederates, HAS any citations or other sources of verification for their own accusations. They are merely using the article, which is faithful to the material it cites, to prosecute their philosophical bias against its topic, the CTMU, which was deemed notable and newsworthy by several international periodicals and news networks. They do not like what the CTMU says; the article on the CTMU reports on what the CTMU says, and what Langan and the press say about the CTMU; hence, they do not like the article on the CTMU. This conflation of the article with the theory is reflected in Byrgenwulf's transparent strategy of attacking the theory through the article, attempting to dispose of the message by killing the messenger. Meanwhile, he seemingly fails to register the fact that he is himself in glaring violation of Wikipedia verifiability policy, and that his all-too-evident editorial bias is in massive violation of NPOV as well. Oozing contempt, Byrgenwulf has rumbled into the middle of the CTMU article with a load of summary demands, snide remarks, and self-righteous, factually worthless criticism...but not one relevant citation in hand! Nothing he says is verifiable; as we have now repeatedly seen, he cannot even be trusted on matters in which he claims to be an expert. This makes it very difficult, if not impossible, to take his demands seriously. "

0

0569a07e22b86f53

Siafu, I am getting access denied for GPS PPS. It says ERROR Access Denied Access Denied by security policy The security policy for your network prevents your request from being allowed at this time. Please contact your administrator if you feel this is incorrect. Is this a classified document?

0

056c4484d431f9bb

Hi Danqing, It is very nice to work with you:) Chenxi

0