id
stringlengths 16
16
| comment_text
stringlengths 6
5k
| toxic
int64 0
1
| severe_toxic
int64 0
1
| obscene
int64 0
1
| threat
int64 0
1
| insult
int64 0
1
| identity_hate
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
06728e884267289b | Lol @ you. Glam does not always have something to do with the image... 203.115.131.72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06734fab6c4261c7 | Kirsten Kemp
There is nothing wrong with the Kirsten Kemp edit to Saved by the Bell. Please quit reversing it. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
067385e05d53448b | Where do you sources say tehre was no thorough investigation? Moreover as almost all the sources (including this one) seem to say that Ratzinger re-opened the investigation there must have been one, not matter how cursery. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06751fbb70781e52 | "
Oppose – As pointed above, the other article is up for AFD and will be slaughtered. Also George, you know how tiresome these move requests of yours are becoming right? You don't weigh the pros and cons and is just trigger happy I see. — · [ ChitChat ] " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0675594ff50d1952 | POV forking
I combined POV fork paragraphs in the article per WP:POVFORK. I also organized redundant references for sake of not deleting them but they will need to be culled. There's a lot of primary sources and original research in the citations that need to be removed.
The POV forks dealt with are:
1. Korean vs Japanese origin of TKD. This POV fork existed in the opening of history section and the modern developments section.
2. Historical context behind Japanese ban of Korean MA. POV fork existed in opening paragraph of modern development section and then again in the third paragraph. The third paragraph also contained editor personal comments and ruminations which is considered original research WP:OR. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0675ca47f054c2c0 | "At bat; Edit Warring at Matt Joyce (baseball), Juan Encarnación, Terry Tiffee, Ian Kinsler, Craig Breslow, Matt Guerrier, etc.==
Please don't change ""At bat"" to ""at-bat"". ""At-bat"" just redirects right back to at bat anyway. -
I agree.
I agree because he is correct that it should not be hyphenated.
In addition, pls stop edit warring at Matt Joyce (baseball), Ian Kinsler, Craig Breslow, etc.
And add to the list Matt Guerrier. It is perfectly accurate and reasonable to reflect his won lost record. There is no reason to delete it, other than your penchant for disruptive edits. Kindly desist.
It has also been explained to you, with proper citations, that the plural of RBI is RBIs. Pls stop edit warring this point. See Juan Encarnación and Terry Tiffee. That is vandalism.
Run batted in says: ""The term may be pluralized as either RBI or RBIs"". Obviously not vandalism then but a difference in opinion then.
@Matt Guerrier, the reason it didn't show up was because a ""|"" was missing, and with your edit you re-removed it and duplicated info.
It's amazing how you continue to assume bad faith, blindly reverting and editwarring over messages on his own talk page... (t / c)
Danged if this little war isn't over some seriously picayune crap. Both sides are being a bit petty here, because really either set of edits is acceptable on these pages (well, except for the bolded Contract on Ian Kinsler either make it a subhed or take it off, seriously).
Oh, and technically, the plural of RBI is RsBI, but that just looks clunky. In common usage, ""RBI"" is used for either singular ""Run Batted In"" or plural ""Runs Batted In"". ""RBIs"" is a bastardization used only because it's simpler from a usage standpoint.
Either way, I think everyone involved in this should chill out for a few days and just leave all these pages alone. -
Jackal4, again, is making a rash of these edits on every page I touch. As to RBIs, as X96lee15 pointed out the most thorough treatment is at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Baseball/Archive_5#RBIs. Plus, mlb.com is the official reporter of baseball, and uses the RBIs convention. Yet, Jackal4's reaction to that is to go on pages where I have written it thus, to delete the s as though the s is incorrect. He has done the same with ""at bat"" which he insists must be hyphenated. Etcetera .... these are just two of the types of reverts he feels impelled to make of my edits. It is picayune, but it is wrong to revert perfectly good edits. If he insisted on lower-casing RBIs, or any similar degradation, I would think it wrong of him to follow people around and revert perfectly good edits. There is enough good work he could perform instead.
Well, I can't stop him from wasting time if that's what he wants to do ) .
As for ""thorough treatment"", I'm not sure I consider a bit to which a grand total of two people contributed particularly thorough. I respect Kingturtle, but I think he's got it wrong on this one. Regarding what mlb.com uses, you're appealing to the wrong authority, because it's not a terminology issue, it's a grammar issue.
In any case, at this point I have no doubt that these edits are being reverted simply because you're both watching for each other's names on your watchlists. Allow me to again encourage the both of you to just stay away from each other's edits entirely for a while and allow the bad feelings to ebb. At the rate you're going, you're both going to get blocked. -
Jargon overrides grammar. To say that a batter ""flied out"" is probably not good grammar either, but it's proper baseball terminology. I think this needs to be discussed at the project page, assuming anyone's watching that page anymore. [[User:Baseball | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
067610263df656a4 | I didn't vandalize a page, you've got the wrong guy. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
067638a445ccd93b | Here, here and here. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0677031090441076 | "Awesome, thanks for taking the time to do so, look forward to you running it. BTW do you have a special interest in Malaysia or something, I've noticed a lot of places were started by you.♦ Dr. Blofeld
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06776dff307a1903 | "
Legislation: European Union
The atricle claims: ""The European Union has ratified a law ""banning incitement to or denial of genocide"" (both the Holocaust and the Armenian Genocide)."" The source reads: ""The European Union has just ratified a law “banning incitement to or denial of genocide” (arguably including both the Holocaust and the Armenian genocide)."" Some enthusiasts removed the word arguably when citing the source.
Let's have a look at the law itself.
Framework decision on combating racism and xenophobia
Official Press Release
Certain forms of conduct as outlined below, which are committed for a racist or xenophobic purpose, are punishable as criminal offences: ... public condoning, denying or grossly trivialising crimes of genocide ... as defined in the Statute of the International Criminal Court (Articles 6, 7 and 8) and crimes defined in Article 6 of the Charter of the International Military Tribunal, when the conduct is carried out in a manner likely to incite violence or hatred against such a group or a member of such a group.
Example: Somebody publicly claims that an act of genocide, the commission of which has been established as a fact by an international court, never happened and was invented by the ethnic group concerned solely for the purpose of being able to claim compensation payments. This allegation would not only deny the genocide committed against the ethnic group concerned, but would also incite hatred against this group. In the future, all Member States would be compelled to criminalise such a case.
Whether a specific historical crime falls within these definitions must be decided in each concrete case by the court which has jurisdiction. In the case of the Holocaust, for example, this was done by the Nuremberg Tribunal.
As we see, the law is restricted to cases, when:
the commission of genocide is established by an international court and
the denial is carried out in a manner likely to incite violence or hatred
Is the commission of Armenian genocide established by an international court? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06778c8d29ca9234 | "
Image:Pandas_and_ppl.jpg
I have tagged Image:Pandas_and_ppl.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under ""fair use"" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0678a7fbe73a8284 | The Christians actually created the idea of Satan by demonizing the god that the Wiccans worshiped. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0678fe61d0ebd1ca | "
This article is a perfect example of doublethink.
The leftists are making George Orwell's 1984 come true and turning our society into a bizarre, illogical politically-correct nightmare where male and female are the same thing and interchangeable. This is postmodernist nonsense run amok and delusions by lunatics become accepted as fact by the leftist media. ""XY is a man. XY is a woman. XY has always been a woman. He is a woman trapped in a man's body. He does not have a mental disorder, despite the fact that it is proven to be a disorder by psychologists. Why are you calling XY a man? That's transphobia! It's racist and sexist and misogynistic and transphobic! XY does not does exist! He has never existed! SHE is XX! SHE merely LOOKED like a man but has MAGICALLY become a WOMAN by HER thoughts! Mental thought determines biology! SHE is a transwoman, not a man! Soft science psychology trumps hard science biology! There is no such thing as biology! What's a biology? That's transphobic! You are a transphobe! Stop harassing this poor woman and respect her magical mental thoughts!""" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0679ab31113fb17b | Also, I am going warthog hunting tomorrow, and need a companion. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
067a61eedbacede2 | "
Agree. It could also be rewritten to say ""A law has been passed that states..."" (followed by whatever, specifically, the law states). " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
067a77ef85d2d93a | Received and responded. Regards, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
067bafafbf153e9f | "
Requested move
Elisabeth Dermot-Walsh → Elisabeth Dermot Walsh – 's move request at Wikipedia:Requested moves read in part: ""Elisabeth's name is spelt without the hyphen. I have edited the page to correct the spelling but cannot edit the name of the article correcting the spelling."" I am copying it here because it is evidently controversial, since the edit referred to was reverted. (talk | contribs) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
067be566410bc2af | VIP report: Sam Spade
Hello Sysy. Note that your Vandalism in progress report concerning was moved to the Administrators' noticeboard for outside input. If you would like to comment, please see WP:AN#VIP_alert:_Sam_Spade. // (admin / talk) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
067bf4c9d6fb8bd4 | Ah, OK. Thank you anyway. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
067c1ea70504b955 | Cirkey! It would seem she is a bit more than her publicist. Although her exact wording there might be legally true. Who am I to judge? - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
067c5e814e88a56b | FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU U USELESS BOT FUCK YOU | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
067c92f0f90ac76e | It isn't. Both aren't even theories, but products of simpleton invention without basis and are completely undoubtedly incorrect. I favor none. I delete(d) them both, because AFAIK there are none sources at all on this issue.
The House of Saint Vladimir is of descent from a Travunian local noble house, with doubtable links to the House of Trpimirovic and most surely no link to the House of Viseslavic.
However, I must object putting it as a separate line - Tvrtko asserted rule and his line (Tvrtkovic) is historically considered the main line of the Kotromanics. As for the Trpimirovic branches, I suggest following standard historical interpretation of the Svetoslavic being a cadet branch, whereas the other being the simple continuation of the standard Trpimirovic line (Kresimirovic)? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
067d284b1c919fb1 | "
WP:AIV
Hi Dan,
I've blocked the two you listed. When using the vandal template you don't need to put the angle brackets in, in fact putting them in generates the wrong output, so you should have been using something like {{vandal|62.254.173.98}}. Thanks (talk) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
067d63fcdaa6e580 | "
The fact remains that you are the largest contributor to this article. Information that you added remains in the article. That alone justifies adding the tag, as a general warning to readers. Thanks, (t/c) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
067d8ab342b30616 | Thanks Alan
thanks for the intro to wiki, you dumb guido, but I think I can figure it out for myself, hotshot. get a real job. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
067da093ddf19112 | == Oh, no, you needn't worry. Except for working crossword puzzles and using it as a highly questionable reference source, I am, I assure you, through with Wikipedia. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
067ecfe8efa28404 | "
Why would ""such a page be tagged for Wikipedia speedy deletion""? Because you wouldn't like it. This site is about informing, so surely I should be allowed to give my honest opinion about Wikipedia whether it is good or bad. Or is Wikipedia immune to criticism?" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
067f2536cce2235d | "
I am amazed to see that ""native speakers"" allegedly confirm the doughnut legend. OK, so JFK could have been understood as saying ""I'm a doughnut"". About as much as someone saying ""I'm a New Yorker"" could be understood as saying they are a magazine, a car, or a train. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
067f55436813a6be | "
The quote is exclusive to the CBR piece though and, as I say goes to the ""did they jump or were they pushed?"" issue - the quote suggests they jumped. The Variety piece (a blog?) says they were fired but doesn't quote a source and that could just their spin. Again we should be careful about our wording as there seems to be different takes on this. For a fully balanced approach we'd need something directly from the production side of things. ( )" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
067f7b7f5e4ba20f | Regarding edits made during October 1 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with the page Image:MaryJaneShoes.jpg on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
067f7e4692624916 | "
I see you've recreated this. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia requires subjects to meet certain notability requirements. This does not appear to meet Wikipedia:Notability (music), the notability guideline for bands. For this article to survive, you will need to have verifiable information from reliable, third party sources unconnected with the subject. Cheers, cierekim''' " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
067fed3425451b0f | " (UTC)
Interesting logic: ""some of the other comics mentioned by Mark Evanier existed, therefore this one must have existed"". Well, here is what Mark Evanier himself has to say about it on his own website (at http://www.newsfromme.com/archives/2003_08_09.html#007191):
And the comic book based on The Dick Van Dyke Show wasn't drawn by anyone since it didn't exist. Yeah, I'm sorry: It's a phony that I cobbled up using an old still and pieces from other Gold Key covers. I wish they had done such a comic and if they had, it would probably have been drawn by Dan Spiegle. But they never did so I whipped up the cover to one to see if anyone would notice.
10:11, 13 May 2009" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0680608685b8ceba | Thanks, Ratagonia. I appreciate that. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
068069fe40537b32 | Ibaranoff Is a Cocksucking Little Bitch
WHY DID YOU DELETE THAT YOU FUCKING LOSER YOU DON'T LIKE BEING WRONG DO YA? I DON'T GIVE A FUCK IF I GET BANNED YOU CAN EAT A DICK. HAVE A NICE LIFE HOPE YOU CAN FIND SOMETHING TO DO WITH IT EXCEPT FOR BE A LITTLE BITCH ON WIKIPEDIA. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
068095ddad3e98a0 | South and Central America?
My understanding is that enough of the dead languages in south and central American culture have been cracked as to allow a better understanding of their level of science? I have no data but perhaps this article could benefit from another section. 87.68.244.139 myg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0681025b5ad21307 | "
As do I, as do I. SVG is an evil, evil format. But, good point regarding your reversal of colours. I hadn't thought about difficulties of white on black, as I was too busy cussing at Inkscape for being a pain in the ass (tried and utterly failed to fix the rounded edge situation. I am reduced to tears). — (t @ c) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06815cfc7ffeaf8c | "
""V-Prop"" should be ""VProp""
""V-Prop"" should be ""VProp"". I propose that we change the name of the page and make the appropriate chnges to the text. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06828458022eb893 | "
List of celebrity and notable guest appearances in Doctor Who
There's a new AfD nomination for an article you've previously discussed. Please stop by to voice your opinions again. '''''' ☎ | ✍ " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0682f55779c44073 | You are either deluded about the nature of your edits or are lying. You have certainly deleted reliable sources and opinions from reliable sources without full consensus and you've done so in the last 24 hours, in fact. I invite anyone to check his contribution history to see if his edits match his claims and am quite confident anyone who does will see what I mean. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0683778ec9c10745 | Yet of course the fact that, 36 years before the revolt, Immanuel Kant called Ashkenazi Jews in northern Europe in 1798, 'Palestinians' can be noted on the Palestinians page. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0683e21d05624e2d | I agree that this should be moved back to Forth Bridge - according to my calculations that's 5 in favour of the move and 2 against any more votes? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0683f1eb0df413d1 | Im sorry are you fucking stupid that nice person just gave me a warning then you fucking block me, nigger cunt eat pussy bitch | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
06851860439bc73c | Bob Parsons
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0685ca0bfe2b5fc9 | }|yes|The committee's decision is still in effect, and can be found in the [ page history].}}
|} | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0686e75d206dbd61 | That goes without saying. Everyone who's edited for more than a week knows that content takes a back seat to Cabal loyalty at Wikipedia. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0687f3591d0cb043 | what r the 3 types of geothermal energy
Yes if you know the 3 types of geothermal enery u r so lucky because iv been looking and cant find anything so if u know please i need your help.... thanks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06889bcb5e18bb47 | Mary Walker
I must know...Did Mary Walker give any contribution to scientific discovery? You see, I was assigned to write a report on Mary Walker, and I have to include at least one thing that she contributed to science. She was a great women and most certainly did plenty for women's rights! But this report is for my science class, so... | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0688fb9174122530 | Attention Wikipedia Administrators
Under mentioned data is for your observations.
This talk page have been misused by the so called intelligent editors, which can be seen by the Archive of this page.
Archive-1, have 18 printed pages of A4 size.
Archive-2, have 21 printed pages of A4 size.
Archive-3, have 28 printed pages of A4 size.
Archive-4, have 40 printed pages of A4 size.
Archive-5, have 44 printed pages of A4 size.
Archive-6, have 57 printed pages of A4 size.
Archive-7, have 31 printed pages of A4 size.
Archive-8, have 35 printed pages of A4 size.
Archive-9, have 29 printed pages of A4 size.
Archive-10, have 32 printed pages of A4 size.
Archive-11, have 40 printed pages of A4 size.
Archive-12, have 15 printed pages of A4 size.
Archive-13, have 47 printed pages of A4 size.
The current talk pages have 25 printed pages material of A4 size paper. Total 464 [ Four Hundred Sixty Four] pages approximately have been used in the discussion. What is it? Is Homoeopathy is so controversial subject that such a big discussion cannot solve by anyone? Is it not a shameful condition for all, those who have participated in the discussion? Approximately 500 pages have been used for discussion without any conclusion. The learned editors perhaps avoided to consult the other encyclopedias on the subject matters. Only One percent editors are seen to be serious about the subject matters. Rest of the editors either chatting on this page or spreading unnecessary controversy, which have no mean to the subject. The chatting can be seen with the timings of the editors. If anybody goes and sees the UTC timings of the editors, it looks like they are chatting on this page without any serious intentions.
What is it and why it is being allowed in this page? User:debbe, 18 April 2007,01:35 PM IST | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
068917d9eebd769d | yea i dont really care what guidelines of wikipedia are, i am not a slave to wikipetia i am a slave to God subhanawatealla , now that being said why would i go follow wikipedias guidelines when i follow God's guidelines. Hadith does not mean tradition, faith does not mean tradition, religion does not mean tradition, tradition only means tradition, ok? are you smart enough to comprehend discerntion between religion and tradition? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0689570da4c4c09f | Users at Wikipedia should be cool as a cucumber, and admins much more. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0689f0201278abe7 | "==On the Removal of the Redirect==
This page used to redirect to 19th Century Philosophy. I'm not too familiar with the specifics of wikipedia's policies, but I think this redirect was misleading. I also think this article probably deserves a page of its own.
The History of Western Philosophy has a decent section on ""modern philosophy."" How to deal with this overlap, I don't know... but if modern philosophy is going to be a redirect, maybe it should go to History of Western Philosophy." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
068b565efd17dd8c | That is right and please here me out boss, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
068c8620c801991a | Since WMC outed himself, above, we can read a bit about him. It would be interesting to known what he, as an official Green, thinks about Gardner's attack on organic farming, and whether he'd propose the exclusion from this article of opinion from organic farming advocates. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
068d0688dd8acdb1 | , 27 May 2011 (UTC)
No, I suppose you wouldn't. 22:55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
068e14faad3180b8 | "
Let me get this straight, my last post, is cause for you to post something on mine saying last warning I'm going to be banned? I didn't 'accuse' you of enlisting someone else, I thought you had but you didn't it turns out, so basically by saying ""are you trying to bore me?"" that is why you are threatening to ban me? YOU KEEP POSTING ON MY TALK PAGE. STOP POSTING AND COMPLAINING AND THEN POSTING AGAIN. I'm not doing anything wrong. Take some responsibility " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
068e2400b1c78a0e | Ownership
Who owns Taransay? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
068e7e86f38c9453 | "
You were wrong and you know it. I never was ""vandalising"" the page129.2.44.118 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
068fd06bed8a149b | For what purpose was the U.S census office reinterpreting a foreign census? My hunch is that spoken Rusyn and western Ukrainian are closely related. For example my father learned Polish at home from his mother, he was a Pennsylvania coal miner and understood Rusyn after working 18 years underground. I remember him saying that the Rusyn's did not like to be referred to as Ukrainians. If he were alive today he would understand this discussion.
Dr. Franklin please cite a reliable source from the Cold War era on this Rusyn and Ukrainian dispute we are having. Here in New York the local Rusyns and Ukrainians are happy like peas in a pod see Ukrainian Americans in New York City. If you are in NY drop me a line and we can have lunch there. Regards | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0690d7e6c2835f17 | Example: Say there are 10 equally good horses in a race. The odds would be decimal 10 or 9:1 to be fair. But typically the odds available will be decimal 8 or 7:1 at best. Backing 9 of the horses with a stake of GBP10 each in order to lay the remaining horse results in a loss of GBP20 no matter which horse wins. 05:10, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0691cd46db4ad623 | Thanks. My guess is that other people who will just be noticing this change in their edit summaries, will have similar questions. Can we add a link to the WikiProject from the CFD discussion? onka | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0692163e00f7294b | POD & SHIITHEAD
Be polite
Assume good faith
Avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming
I haven't seen you follow any of these guidelines. ~*~ M ~*~ 67.164.145.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06928d7e2969745b | - unsigned comment | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0692c4819c407507 | , 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Is there any way to make them visible again so they can be discussed for a revision of deletion? Thanks again. 18:31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06933310fe55a295 | - Jacob Barnett
Username: JacobBarnett52698 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06933bc775cbfdaa | "
Kit Number
Why is his number listed as ""10""
He wears 11 for Milan" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0693fd2170ecfa6d | Can we go on a date
I want to sniff your leaky blood box! | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06946395f814e4b9 | C.D. Strand - Ranking The President (2003)
I found this ranking, but I am having some difficulty adding it with the coding place. Could someone add it? Here's the link to poll http://www.cdstrand.com/areas/essays/presranks.htm | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0695bf7c3660a17d | ": The checkuser I talked to (User talk:Elockid#Beloki) didn't think there was a connection between et al and when I asked, and I myself now don't believe it entirely fits based on the behavioural evidence. Certainly asking TheShadowCrow is pointless, because he will not give honest answers. · talk
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0695e0af39cb0e22 | Piss off you sanctimonious weed. You forget that 1. you are irrelevant to this topic, 2. you arbitrarily abused your privileges (I mean, what sort of prick suspends someone in another country over a dispute he wasn't even a party to?).
So when you and Daniel Dumbass have finished stroking each others egos, you might want to remember this about Wikipedia | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06960372c6ea8fa6 | "
Actually I am fully Arabic and Islamic and the correct spelling unlike how you stupid christians have been spelling it is ""Mou'ammar Al Qadhdhaffy"". But you are all too racist and white and stupid too accept that124.180.159.192 " | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
0697a68ca79783be | Negatively biased article
The following was entered into the article text in these edits by 139.182.118.81 ( ):
'Whomever wrote this wikipedia information, has a clear bias and is absolutely against Dr. Albert Rivera. In this biograpgy he is promptly attacked as a fraud before and after stating the life of Dr. Alberto. The refrences of public magazines where Dr. Rivera is pointed as a fraud are commentary, opinionated and are not mere fact. It is clear that Dr. Rivera's life is quite controversial and to discredit him is the easiet form to invalidate his claims. Out of evident knowledge, Dr. Alberto was not Anti-Catholic, he only spoke what he lived. It would be quite contradicting to have been not only a Roman Catholic, but a Jesuite and then be margined as Anti-Catholic. Obviously this would be the best label in order for Catholics to reject and discard whatever Dr. Rivera has said. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0697e06c368a55ef | Stanley's prototype
Everyone, I know what Stanley's prototype is! He is the early version of the E2. I know cause I wrote to HiT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06980c9dfd50769e | Your low self-esteem
I see you have such a low self-esteem that you have to warn others not to attack you.4.130.134.233 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
069814faed50614c | "
Scope of Article Too Limited
The right to keep and bear arms is not limited to firearms. It includes all types of arms. But this article mistakenly presumes it applies only to guns. The scope of the discussion should be broadened to encompass the scope of the right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.31.244.28 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06989113e0a0148a | I wanted to report the vandalism of a
> user of Wikipedia ,Alexikoua .I think that he has vandalised the
> information about the ethnic groups in Albania by incresing the percentage
> of greek population in Albania.I think that it is a clear vandalism and
> GREEK NATIONALISM and i wanted your help about this problem.
> I wanted you to solve this problem as soon as possibl because i think that
> it is not just a vandalism,but a SERIOUS PROBLEM,NATIONALISM.
> User:Zakoni.
>
>
>
>
> P.s: Here is the correct informatoin.Source:ALBANIAN GOVERNMENT.
> http://www.instat.gov.al/media/178070/rezultatet_kryesore_t__censusit_t__popullsis__dhe_banesave_2011_n__shqip_ri.pdf
>
>
> This user has used sources that are not in accordance with the rates that
> the user has added itself in Wikipedia.In addition most of the sources of
> this user belongs to year 2002 or earlier.I wanted you to take
> disciplinary action against this user ,Alexikoua. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
069b54ba40591700 | "According to page C17 of this NIST document:
http://ts.nist.gov/WeightsAndMeasures/Publications/upload/h4402_appenc.pdf
""by custom, 42 gallons comprise a barrel of crude oil or petroleum products for statistical purposes, and this equivalent is recognized ""for liquids"" by four States.""
Based on the above, it should be noted that (a) the definition of 42 gallons is ""by custom"" - not ""by law"", and (b) the definition of 42 gallons is ""for statistical purposes"" and does not mention ""for use in trade or commerce"".
This NIST document (page 10) also states that a barrel of oil is 42 gallons (approx. 159 liters):
http://ts.nist.gov/WeightsAndMeasures/Metric/upload/fs376-b.pdf
NYMEX does define the capacity of a barrel in terms of gallons according to this:
http://www.nymex.com/CL_spec.aspx
Here we see that the trading unit (for Light Sweet Crude Oil) is specified as ""1,000 barrels (42,000 gallons)"".
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
069c7e6a477fe71d | "
yeah sorry
can you tell me what latter means??? and im talking about on Far Cry: Vengeance when you said ""lift up the latter"", what does that mean, and is it formal?" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
069c83ab7e46c122 | Note his response to me on his talk page. That is a good first step. Unfortunately our policies in dealing with people like him are pretty toothless, and intentionally so. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
069c9104403f37a4 | Bill Stewart
I took a photo of the picture of him in the Fiesta Bowl program. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
069d012ef2b99e79 | I guess you got a stalemate then? (
I actaully searched for Keediz on line and like you found nothing, But I have heard it used on TV loads of times. I really love children (In a legal way) and I hate adults treating them like idiots.
Never the less your threats have been taken into acount and as I'm not yet finished with this site, I will refrain from posting anything Keediz realated unless I can provide proof, and to be on the safe side I will ASK you before I do so. I hope we have a neutral understanding, but this doesn't remove my pain. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
069d0872303ffabe | why do you think your above me? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
069d2bd492641000 | Migdia Chinea
1326 Cordova Avenue
Glendale, California 91207
818.956.0536
March 11, 2008
Robert Deegan
General Liability Claims Section
Los Angeles Unified School District
333 S Beaudry Ave 28th Floor
Los Angeles CA 90017
Dear Mr. Deegan:
This letter shall constitute a claim pursuant to the California Tort Claims Act, Section 910 et seq of the California Government Code.
My address information in compliance with Section 910(a) and (b) is set forth above.
Per Section 910(c), (d) and (e), the date of occurrence was October 5, 2007. I was assaulted and battered by students T and I and possibly other students at Markham Middle School, 145 W 108th Street, Los Angeles. The Police Report is DR#071828895.
LAUSD personnel, specifically, Steven Thomas Rooney, aided and abetted violations of the Ralph and Bane Civil Rights Acts, Sections 51.7, 52 and 52.1 of the California Civil Code and Sections 242, 245, and 422.6 of the California Penal Code, by failing and refusing to report the matter to police authorities. LAUSD violated my rights under Article I, Section One of the California Constitution to safety and my specific right to safety on a school campus under Article I, Section 28 of the California Constitution. I have suffered physical damages and extreme emotional trauma as a result.
David Brewer and other personnel knew or should have known based upon my complaints and upon past known misconduct by Rooney that Rooney was unfit as a supervisory employee of LAUSD. LAUSD therefore negligently hired, trained, assigned, supervised and retained Rooney and ignored my complaints about his misconduct.
LAUSD’s conduct towards me is motivated by benign neglect of complaints of discrimination, retaliation, and harassment by Latino employees, as exemplified in past incidents by Superintendent Brewer and the General Counsel’s office failing to properly investigate and take appropriate action when complaints were levelled against anti-Hispanic ethnocentric misconduct against an attorney employed by the Office of the General Counsel, and other incidents.
Pursuant to Section 910(f) this claim is for damages within the jurisdiction of the unlimited division of the Los Angeles Superior Court.
Respectfully Submitted,
Migdia Chinea
cc: California LULAC Civil Rights Commission, United For Education Coalition | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
069e6f34fbcc0988 | "
Look, she the one that ""personally attacked"" me, did you NOT just read her post. They gonna try to be smart with it, because they scared to say what they feel. You unfair, ! 19:08, 8 June 2006." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
069e8dee8fb040a9 | Bold text Italic text | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
069f280b1ef2f4c6 | Page Blanking
On 03-Apr, you blanked 1st Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division. Blanking pages is generally considered a bad idea. I have changed this redirect to U.S. 1st Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division to avoid the disambig page. If this was the result of a broken edit, you may wish to make the correct edits. If you believe the redirect should be deleted, please follow the redirect portion of the deletion procedures. If you have questions, please let me know. Thanks! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
069f7c2315031b40 | important
you and your family shall burn! you have been warned, if you do troll muzemikes talk page i will slaughter you in your sleep. bye... | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
069ff6733ad5aef4 | (UTC)
But that way you'd have to include that factor (and its powers) into time complexity of almost every algorithm! It's not a very useful thing to care about, and so in the usual computational model, used for analysis of algorithms (RAM machine), a machine word is assumed to be of size bits, and so addition of numbers of that size is . 14:26, 22 September 2009 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06a07c3f0ac900ad | DON'T BLOCK ME I AM RIGHT AND I FUCKING KNOW IT. BLOCK THAT ASSHOLE KANSAS BEAR OR SOMETHING. JUST LEAVE ME THE FUCK ALONE. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
06a10be56f9fbc60 | "== May 2015 ==
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06a110ef0643178f | "
I agree, though that section does need references, and any new additions, especially by lesser-known musicians, must be referenced. -''''''The '45 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06a132e6a70c8fb8 | WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE? STOP CRITIZING US!!! YOU'RE WRITING IN OPINION!! FUCK STOP THIS! MADDOX IS A PRICK | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06a17ec612dafa42 | Well most of them do you dufus.User:Pic Business | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06a2372846507613 | I think the Malcolm X section could be eliminated. Yes, he's a charismatic figure, but why highlight him and not Farrakhan and other influential figures? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06a31d9efd63c6f4 | I didn't put it there Haab, it's actually quite pitiful. I don't know, sorry. 04:12, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06a44c69b4c3fb43 | In response to your recent comment on my talk page.
I suggest you contract cancer. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06a57888285c9097 | "
Remember when I first added it and you deleted it for the first time, you said ""third highest of 1994 doesn't really cut it"", well now that information of it being THE highest grossing film of 1992 has been found it should be on that list. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06a5f5b693af9f13 | Peer Reviews
Happy New Year, Wack'd! Since you've assessed quite a few good articles and contributed to them, I thought I could solicit your assistance. I've submitted two articles for peer review, and thought that you might be of some help in critiquing them:
Duck Soup. I've listed this article for peer review because, even though I and other editors have contributed much information and references, I'm certain that there are other aspects of this classic film that have yet to be covered. I'd like to hear feedback from you, so that I can get help in improving this (and other Marx Brothers films) quality.
Princess Leia Organa. I've listed this article for peer review because it right now seems oddly cluttered and, despite a lot of references as of now, lacks reliable source citations. Although I've already requested another peer review, as long as it helps the articles get better, I've got the time. Any helpful comments will certainly be appreciated, as this should help me in expanding other Star Wars-centric articles.
If you have the time, it'd be great if you could review those articles and assess their strengths and weaknesses. Thanks, and a Happy New Year to you! — (talk • contribs) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06a63c51daa1e92b | The Mosman article looks fine. I think it has something to do with the info box on the right pushing the image on left down the page. I have seen this problem before on other pages but it only seems to happen on Firefox
Okay. Thanks for that. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06a6d6be5554b033 | User Pgagnon999
Pgagnon999 is only stalking this page in an attempt to start a flamewar. I encourage all posters to use caution. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
06a70465bf349bc9 | That post wasn't intended to be a troll post. I felt surprised someone would think that. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.