Datasets:
tasksource
/
jigsaw_toxicity

Dataset card Data Studio Files Community
1
id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
0743a5fedb61c49c
" In the first par, it says evidence points to an 11 C entry ""at the very earliest""... and two sentences later, other evidence is suggesting as early as 900 AD, ie, the beginning of the 10th C. Also, use of the word ""our"" when refering to Europe is exclusionary."
0
0
0
0
0
0
0744e7b160bf6a5f
liableous? Not sure what that is. But you should certainly look at FilePile anyway. The logo image has been vandalised. Most of the edits to the main page are disingenuous (see FilePile talk). Also, someone is vandalising the acronym FP (where I first came across the FilePile article, after Gozar's addition of Force Publique). I expect it's part of some game the people at FilePile are playing -
0
0
0
0
0
0
074532a6b7a51f56
Let them leave Ayers and Wright out. It lowers Wiki's credibility and validifies the fact that WP has a strong liberal bias. Eventually nobody will take Wikipedia seriously. 24.187.127.175
0
0
0
0
0
0
0745d180f581d7d0
Hey Muhandes why dont you get a life.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0746326637273105
I'll reply in a few days on AGW wikibreak, read the abuse upthread to see why. Ugh. Best,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0748488058630043
Check the content and you will understand. In particular, see this. Two years on and he has learned nothing. 86.134.59.236
0
0
0
0
0
0
0748b478b84d6898
Atreus Why don't you want information relevant to Atreus included on his page? This is vandalism in my opinion.
1
0
0
0
0
0
0749265cc1a40ea5
To re-emphasize, this entire paragraph was extremely judgemental. Even if you think all lawsuits should be barred, and victims (many who died as a result of asbestos) should be labeled 'shams', this is not appropriate for any encyclopedia.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0749d09de769a638
" Yeah and in the earlier sentence I'd reword ""fever pitch"". "
0
0
0
0
0
0
074a6dd680bee18f
Please read WP:POINT ... before making score format changes as you did to Pete Sampras. Thanks.
0
0
0
0
0
0
074c7e463f48e3b7
CONGRATULATIONS! Your name just went on the list. You COULD have done the honorable thing and left it out, but instead choose to push biased company information, even though I ASKED for it to be left out. You'll learn soon enough what happens to an editor who constantly pushes biased information.
0
0
0
0
0
0
074d49202c22a45e
"? Is he ""special"""
0
0
0
0
0
0
074e8f1919b6e2fc
. I don't know Dr. Blofeld. You react excessively.
0
0
0
0
0
0
074efcbf518276c3
"==Irving Literary Society (Cornell University)== Deletionism and inclusionism in Wikipedia Neutral point of view Third Party Review, WikiProject New York Posting Transferred from User Page: Hi Cmagha! I never saw the original AfD discussion, but I think the article looks like the start of something fantastic! My only concern would be that the majority of your references seem to come from ""Cornell specific"" sources (i.e. Cornell Daily Sun, Cornell Era, Cornell Register, etc...). College/ university published sources are a bit of a grey area within WP:N when dealing with a campus organization, as some may not consider these to be ""independent of the subject."" That being said, we aren't dealing with a fly by night college band that played at Moonshadows and had a writeup in the Ithacan, this is a literary society almost as old as Cornell University itself and has had significance well beyond East Hill. Despite the large number of CU oriented sources (which I personally believe are independent), you have enough that would be unambiguously independent to survive another AfD if need be. I'd post what you have now and keep looking for more! ' says you, says two Wow, great work. Sorry I've been out of the loop. Double smiley face from the Syracuse Orangemen brought in to ensure neutrality. Think the critics need to read the article from a distance this is hardly promotional, when you think about it. It is basically saying that Cornell University had a chance to excell in an intellectual activity, and tanked. We obviously would not have done that at SU. I do think there is a Sumner cite out there to, that Cmagha missed. Will look for it. WIPTransferred from User PageOversaw your preparations at . Since others may communicate here now and again, you may want to move your editorial notes to a user subpage, like talk Thanks for the tip ! Very hard to learn lots of the intricacies of the Wikiworld. I stll have some prep to do before asking the administrator to move that article over; there are two editors, in particular, who are still a little raw on the article and the administrator while fair and neutral has been tough. Guidance from Administtrator, October 1, 2010 Just reviewed the Irving article, again. Notability addressed in the first seven footnotes. Will move it back into the mainspace unless you have additional concerns.173.59.205.137 I think it's ready to go; also see on Cmagha's user page that others have reviewed it positively. What are the remaining objections, and how do we appeal if there are still objections? Here is the page, Spartaz, if you need a refresher: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cmagha/The_Irving_Literary_Society_(Cornell_University) Take it to DRV please. Humbug! Administrator Guidance to Editor, July 11 2010 Copied from Spartaz User page: The Irving article has been noticed on the WikiProject New York page; some helpful comments sent back. Did not receive notice on your G4 decision; we will be asking to move the article back to mainspace shortly. Thanks for the aid. No. Unless you have addressed the significant issues concerning allegations of misrepresenting sources and the contention that all of the sources are tangential or trivial then this isn't going back into mainspace. Humbug! Material for Spartaz to Review Prior to Deciding Whether to Move Article to Mainspace, July 11, 2010 Comparators: In order of less, to more, evidence: Sphinx (senior society) (Notability based incredibly on primary,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0750213f69d91d8a
I guess that was the NEXT to last warning huh...funny thing is this has been stumbled. Now thousands of people are going to be aware of your selective editing. This is the internet bitch and it's free and you can't get away with your slimy little agenda anymore. You are outed.
1
0
1
0
0
0
07503a77f38a238c
Well gladly go fuck yourself you numb fuck.
1
0
1
0
1
0
075078cee9bbce79
I fully agree with recommending the image for deletion, especially in light of the dubious claims as to its authenticity. While his hair does have some natural wave, it is nowhere near that long or curlyto say nothing of the clear differences in face shape, length, width, and symmetry. Some of the first image results on a Google search are T.R. with longer/wavy hair, and there is no resemblance to the individual in the picture being debated. In terms of specific detailsyou've claimed this is a recent picture from T.R.'s breaka date that the picture was taken would be a good start.
0
0
0
0
0
0
075179455542eca2
" Kotowski doesn't write that past 1920 was ""earliest phase of Polish rule"". I added proper tag-you are manipulating the source. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0751cf8bc1abeaba
" More description of location please? Hello, I wondered if someone with the requisite local knowledge would please consider adding a short sentence, maybe in the description section, to explain where this bridge is? I do appreciate that its location is already described in the lead as crossing between things X and Y but if you don't already know Stockton well (or recently!) this is not necessarily all that helpful. I was wondering if you could write a more bottom-up description which says something like ""the bridge crosses the Tees at blah (or near Blah Street etc); it is A hundred metres downstream from the Foo Bridge and B hundred metres upstream from the Bar Barrage"" or whatever, which it seems to me would nail it in more empirical terms. What do you think? Any yes, of course the maps link does nail it (assuming the co-ordinates are right!) but something in the text which helps in this way would, I think, be very useful. I may be being unusually thick (happens all the time, actually) but on my first reading - and I was last in Stockton in 2007, you see - I was not at all sure where it was, wondering if in fact it replaced the other rather nice pedestrian bridge closer to the town centre. I cured this uncertainty by looking at the maps, yes, but the sentence I'm asking for would have given me more direct access to the knowledeg. Go on, please write it for me, you know you want to; and I will go and put the kettle on for you. Thanks and best wishes "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0752176547da3d03
ASSHAT FUCKING STUPID ASSHOLE PAIR OF CLOWNSHOES
1
0
1
0
1
0
0753a3466b515384
JG55 wow thanxs for getting be and balz blocked maybe if u mine your own business and woundlnt talk to us were 10 years old and u are tlaking to us and we told u to stop so plz do thanx u
0
0
0
0
0
0
07545564d657905a
Automatic protection for Main Page? It would be straightforward to write a bot that (1) protected all images on the main page, adding Template:Mprotected, and (2) unprotected all images with Template:Mprotected that no longer appeared on the main page. Feature (2) would be genuinely useful and save editors work. However, if editors came to rely on feature (1) then that would introduce a risk, because there would always be a gap between an image appearing on the main page and the bot protecting it. A clever vandal could vandalize the image in that gap. And worse, the bot would end up protecting the vandalized version of the image. I suppose the bot could attempt to detect vandalism like that but you can see how complex the process could become. 08:13, 2005 May 13 (UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
075470fcd26696f3
, 19 May 2006 (UTC) Edit: Granted, it seems to be only one person making lots of changes to the Assyrian related articles. 10:01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0754cb0c9804dc4e
''' Superscript text
0
0
0
0
0
0
0754ff9de53abaca
me again (my ip keeps changing!!) U shouldn't remove topics from your talk page just in case u ever want to be an admin, they dig deep on requests for adminship! Also I don't need to make positive contributions, I've written 40+ articles and taken 100+ photos which surely allows me to ridicule shit singers once in a while. Btw sorry for the personal attack! No need for that. Editing wikipedia is an important and noble thing 82.132.136.211
0
0
0
0
0
0
075598ae8e6c3004
Again, he talks of a noncoherent discussion on my part when it is apparent (by the date of edits) that he has taken the liberty to open section after section discussing either me, or my edits without replying where I had already given the reasons for my edits in another section. So who is being incoherent ?
0
0
0
0
0
0
07563b85d926f3b5
Sooo.... I don't get how the file upload page worksonce you follow the upload steps, I don't see how you finish the process. It's this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard&?withJS=MediaWiki:FileUploadWizard.js this page looks different from how it did the last time I tried it, btw.
0
0
0
0
0
0
075744ca0099fad8
" Finally, I would not be referring to the article on ""alternate theories on the Plame affair"" if rewinn had not recommended moving material from this article to that article. That article still has disputed neutrality, and I do not think that it is an article to recommend reading.NYScholar "
0
0
0
0
0
0
075775fb6ffd5140
"Durrr..??? - OMS!! Do you really believe you needed to explain that to me?? (What ever gave you that idea??).Put that directly in the article if you like - AS I SAID. I thought we both had concurred that it was redundant Due to the (prepared via the Eschweiler-Clarke synthesis) linked reaction. I fail to see any point to this comment you have made to me. Or Again What were/are you ""trying"" to say. So as it appears all my previous words were lost on you, Shall we start again positively and constructively??. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0757812d7478dadd
OpenFuture is heading a group of disreputed people whose aim is to censor everything they don't like and defame his opponents. Hi was before Christmas banned from the Swedish newspapers. I learnt very much from you and am greatful for this.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0757f725d60e92e0
This it isn't a debate, its a discussion (see (WP:POLL]]). You can likely find references that use both terms, that is the problem, and why gaining WP:consensus is exactly the right thing to do. The purpose is to air out all sides under equal terms, and avoid edit wars and arguments.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0758306f5569c194
" Here's ONE example of McNeight-speak Your post to Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment does not provide enough information so that anyone can review the threats and personal attacks that you claim were made by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Braaad QUOTE from McNeight: Wikipedia is a community. The focus is not on you or me, but the encyclopedia. Create as many user names as you want, but eventually your ""personality"" will come through. If you can't or won't interact with people in a normal manner (hint: take a look at meta:Don't be a dick and Wikipedia:Civility for some tips on human-human interaction), then get the fuck out. McNeight SIGNED! Because I'm not a bitter and petty authority-wannabe attention-freak coward. I think my favorite part is: ""...get the fuck out."" Please protect me from this dangerous creature!! "
1
0
1
0
0
0
075865f0a5e6966f
" Sock Hi User:Materialscientist this user here is a block evading sock but I cant remember who of. Thought you might recognise it. let's discuss it "
0
0
0
0
0
0
07590502f252ba19
eat a dick and fuck off
1
1
1
0
1
0
07595d0b792ca579
Your userpage I have deleted your user page. It is intended for basic information about yourself or your Wikimedia-related activities. Although a lot of leeway is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not a personal website, blog, or social networking medium, nor should it be used to promote yourself, or host a fake article, CV, or lengthy biography. Please do not be offended, and please feel welcome here. I encourage you to help build the encyclopedia. If there is anything you ever need, just ask. Best wishes,
0
0
0
0
0
0
07596c03a08b7689
" Wishaw General Hospital A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Wishaw General Hospital, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with . "
0
0
0
0
0
0
075a3b3f69b6e1ff
Interaction Parameter, R0 Is there any reason the method for calculating the interaction parameter is not mentioned anywhere? It just seems to be introduced as some mythical concept rather than pointing out that it is determined through trial and error based on empirical evidence of what solvents dissolve the material.
0
0
0
0
0
0
075a4b83f3eba42f
"Changes to this Page - Open discussion == Since my first contribution over two months ago, I have been trying my best to make known my views on what improvements could be made to this page. After an initial consultation with an administrator I decided to ""be bold"" and start a ""démenagement"" of all that had nothing to do with the city of Paris. I was met with opposition over a link - and after being complained about I thought it best to put things back the way they were until I could get a good feel of the ""general concensus"" of the page's contibutors. I have seen little concensus but a lot of silent stalling. My goal here is not to ""control"" anything, as was complained to one of the administrators - I would like only to contribute to making a better page. I have learned much from other Paris pages and pages concerning French history - namely those concerning the French kings - but those are well covered as far as knowledgable contributors are concerned and are in little need of improvement, so I had little to do there. This page, on the other hand, I find lacking, and see many things that could be improved. The most important fault this page has is its quantity of specialised information - far too much for a general ""Paris"" page. The search function is a very important element of Wikipedia, and with this in mind, much on this page is redundant and unneccessary. Those looking for ""Paris economy"" will type exactly that into the search window. The same for ""Paris history"" or ""paris fashion"". Here I am but repeating what I have already written below. In short, in order to make this page a comprehensible tool for one looking for a lead from the subject of Paris, or one totally ignorant on the subject - in other words, one who knows only enough to type only ""Paris"" into the search window - I propose to move the more ""specialty"" information to their own pages. My apologies to those who have contributed the more detailed information, but this would be better suited to a ""specialty"" page of its own. This would even be a positive move, as it would allow the contributor knowledgable in the subject of his contribution to expand his input far beyond what could be contained on this one page. The irony of the sort is that, though I contribute to Wiki, it won't be to this page in any quantity. My specialty is the history of Paris, and I cannot even think to add that knowledge here - Paris' history has a page of its own. Just to give you all a clear idea of where my aims are. Here I would like to contribute in the interest of clear information. I hope with this post to create an opportunity for improvement - please answer with any ideas you would have. With this post I would also like to ""sound the board"" - to see whether it is an interest for information or partisanship that holds the upper hand on this page, as what I have seen to date leaves room for doubt. In your answers, I hope for evidence to the contrary. Please feel free to forward any thoughts on the matter at all. ADDENDUM You can find a proposition for restructuring here -> - please keep in mind that this is only a structure reference marked only by short notes, I don't really want to cut everthing out! == "
0
0
0
0
0
0
075aa080f410a458
"""After studying the phenomenon of electrolysis in 1874, the Anglo-Irish physicist G. Johnstone Stoney suggested that there existed a ""single definite quantity of electricity."" He was able to estimate the value of the charge e of a monovalent ion by means of Faraday's laws of electrolysis.[10] "" This means that chemistry is part of the definitio if the electron. The value of charge, was equated to faradays laws of electrolysis. There should be an section in the electron article on chemistry. *And if your going to mention obscure ""virtual electrons"" why not mention chrystal fields, because that is fundamental to chemistry. *If your going to mention quantum physics, why cant you mention quantum chemsitry, because I think chemistry is just as important to physics if not more important. *And I think there should be a section on electrolysis. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
075aa6a794e55bad
Removal of referenced information Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Also should I remove all references, that I consider to be nationalist, in your style?
0
0
0
0
0
0
075bb05fd437aa49
You have a dramatic way of expressing yourself. Your specific and narrow point, though, about BLPCRIME is flawed.
0
0
0
0
0
0
075ce7d44411e398
This song was coverd by Paul Torrence, Tanner Viox, The Banjo sisters, and The super BEbop Boys featuring Al Gore.
0
0
0
0
0
0
075d5a4bf446934e
AGAINST I am against this proposal because you touch yourself at night!
0
0
0
0
0
0
075d8d9e3b2c6455
" Ranganathan and the Colon Classification Spat, here's the famed Indian librarian I was telling you about: S._R._Ranganathan. And I just discovered on that page a talk he gave about Dewey! Here's a page about him, and I have the ""Prolegomena"" book which is only held by 510 libraries worldwide (more or less). It is a truly amazing book on the organization of knowledge, for the few who can understand it. And thanks for all your help today. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
075d9debbca9d2f0
RfC: Earlier it was reported that the name of the rape victim was said to be revealed as Jyoti Singh Pandey but later it was proven untrue. Can the unproven name be included in the article? Earlier it was reported the name of the rape victim was revealed on the request of her father but later it was reported that the father never gave permission nor revealed the name. Should this unproven or false name be included in the article?
0
0
0
0
0
0
075df0856884781e
I am requested an account on the ACC account creation interface.
0
0
0
0
0
0
075f1f10beb1e1b2
" (UTC) No, she or he is attempting to argue that Molly could not distinguish between ""place"" and ""plaice"". It doesn't seem entirely implausible that Joyce is using Molly's mistakes to play with language here, but I agree of course that the object in question is in fact ""plaice"". 134.226.1.229 14:50, 13 March 2010"
0
0
0
0
0
0
075f661796eea24a
"Also you were involved in the initial edit war, and in your edit summary incorrectly referred to a referenced and notable quote as ""rmv office gossip""."
0
0
0
0
0
0
0760f15016b36583
[name of possible attack site]
0
0
0
0
0
0
076107246aaad137
For further info.... Ello there, the Doctor here... Here's a link concerning the * if you hadn't already checked out the TCW talk page. It's from a pretty good episode too, although the image on the episode article here is from In a Mirror, Darkly... That rather bugged me. Anyways, thanks for pointing out a possible inconsistency in the dimensional drift of the article. These things always need improving... Many happy returns.
0
0
0
0
0
0
07612ca2d3778687
" Not a problem. I would suggest you start by drafting up the article on your computer. Get some good text, some sources, and figure out what types of wikilinks you want to include. Also, you will want to mark it with {{stub}} if it's short. See WP:STUB for more details on making a good stub. Alternatively, you can create a subpage in your userspace such as (C•T•) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
07626231559eb6cb
Are you kidding? Take your threats and shove em.
0
0
0
0
0
0
07627c6eca101d4b
Official Christian Death ® This page is constatntly written to with opinions and non factual rubbish, which simply need changing and then leaving alone. I have now prepared an unbiased wiki article which I wish to place on here, knowing full well that 5 minutes later, the fools that wish to write things they know little about, or have a vested interest in making it appear that facts can be altered to suit their own quest to become CD, will desperately alter the content. The article needs protecting and only updateable by official christian death facts. People that want information about any past members will have to have pages dedicated to them. But the article should be adhered to as much as facts allow. 3rd party discussion regarding Valor or Rozz should be eliminated in favour of the Christian Death Biography. message me at myspace.com/Official_Christian_Death to have discussion about page. ARTICLE I PROPOSE IS THUS: text only- I will alter the page to format correctly, and alter the main page, add feedback to this AFTER MY DISCUSSION in thread called - Editing Talk:Christian Death® (comment) , not inside this. CHRISTIAN DEATH BIOGRAPHY & Discography In the beginning God created the Heaven and the Earth. Then Christian Death turned it upside down. History Officially there have been over 30 musicians involved with the band. Therefore a historical litany of them all would be impractical. Formed in Los Angeles and fronted by 16 year old vocalist/lyricist Rozz Williams, the band released the first album “Only Theatre Of Pain in 1982. A dark, sinister style of punk rock. The album gained local success. A year later the band completely broke up Singer Rozz then joined the band “Pompeii 99' founded by singer, guitarist, song writer Valor. Rozz took over vocals leaving Valor to focus on guitar. Before Rozz joined Pompeii 99, the band had already released their fist album “Look At Yourself” to much acclaim, which had an apocalyptic theme with a punk rock flavor. The Pompeii 99 had been planning their first tour when it was proposed by their French record company, to merge Pompeii 99 into a new version of Christian Death which after some debate was agreed upon. Thus, began the new Christian Death and the first Pompeii 99 tour became the first Christian Death tour. Part way through the tour the band stopped in Wales to record songs, some of which were originally intended for the next Pompeii 99 album. The fusion of which led to the unique sound of the classic “Catastrophe Ballet”. Like the first Pompeii 99 album, Catastrophe Ballet had an apocalyptic theme, however the music morphed into something not quite Pompeii 99 and nothing like the first Christian Death album. After the tour the band returned to LA to later record the 3rd Christian Death album”Ashes”which was a post apocalyptic vision of a cold and bleak future. After confirming the 2nd tour in 85 singer Rozz quit the band. Valor returned to vocals, the band embarked on the 2nd tour. In Italy the band recorded the mini album “The Wind Kissed Pictures”, a surrealist view of a mystical past. Almost immediately work began on the 4th full length album “Atrocities” inspired by the atrocities of World War II and the connection to future shock waves. While continuously touring in 87 the band released the 5th and now classic album “The Scriptures”, the theme of which explored world religion and how the legacy of these beliefs impact our world today. 1988 Brought us the release of “Sex & Drugs & Jesus Christ”. This was turning point for the band. The cover depicted an image of Jesus shooting up heroin. This was a full frontal attack by Valor against the Church with a scathing heretical mockery of organized Christianity. The band then found themselves confronted by protesters, riots and bomb threats, These events and the bands imagery and fashion went on to influence the likes of Nine Inch Nails, Korn, Marilyn Manson, Type O Negative, every Goth band on the planet and many others. 1989 saw the release of the double album epic “All the Love, All the Hate” interpreting the juxtaposition between life and death, day and night, man and woman, black and white. In 1991 came the release of “Insanus, Ultio, proditio, Misericordiaque”, with its theme of an ancient dream state. Late in 91, after being in several other bands and seven years after quitting Christian Death, Rozz was persuaded by unscrupulous profiteers to perform at a concert in Los Angels under the name Christian Death. On the same day Christian Death was in Europe performing in Paris, France. Assuming this was a one time effort to earn extra cash, as explained to Valor
0
0
0
0
0
0
076374ac2221ef22
| class=Stub | player=yes | needs-infobox=yes
0
0
0
0
0
0
0763823f40334f5a
Where do you see vandal/attack accounts?
0
0
0
0
0
0
076521d2187716f9
Thanks Hi i'm italian user SoloTitano. Thanks for your work about Sanmarinese footballers and San Marino Calcio's players (i'm a fan of this team). Your work is great, and I hope to use your informations also on it.wiki. Infact I create articles about San Marino Calcio and Sanmarinese sportspeople =) You can also create a category about San Marino Calcio's players like it:Categoria:San Marino Calcio. Contact me for everything and if I can help you =) it:Utente:SoloTitano. Bye
0
0
0
0
0
0
076555e0a4a7f91c
i wasnt even vandalising how is it vandalising??
0
0
0
0
0
0
0765a3348ea92ca8
" 3RR on Phantasy Star Actually, I was the one to initiate the discussion, and the person with whom I was ""edit warring"" with, if you notice, didn't bother to comment at all. His/her initial reason for the edit I disputed was invalid, as I pointed out. So the fault lies not with me, but with '''T C W "
0
0
0
0
0
0
07675145ae3e7dc1
Also the album has won and been nominated for American Music Awards, Soul Train Music Awards, and Grammy Awards. Among others. A sub section should be added. The article needs major improvement. From its over bloated commercial performance section to its lack of order and neatness. As on Alicia Keys Element of Freedom and Eminems Recovery the commercial performance is suppose to list the first few sales weeks. Then give an up to date amount of how much the album has sold and tell how the album performed and charted in other countries. With chart listings and certifications. Not to mention some sources for the last few sales weeks do not show the cited information and/or are POORLY SOURCED.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0767536ff8d17ab7
" All those articles will soon be merged, as well. The discussion came about at the project page (WP:PCP). I don't know the exact page, but perhaps will know exactly where. Please don't remove the re-direct and re-add the previous information that was on the article, Klichka. ''''''(talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0767a9e7fe273a8a
" Haymaker, you may have to re-do the Thomas Glessner article, too. They will probably target it next for deletion on whatever wikilawyering pretext. (What I didn't tell Beback is that the NIFLA article used to be the bottom half of the Thomas Glessner article.) speak! "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0768707b08955943
Alyssaa oconnor is reatrded
0
0
0
0
0
0
0769dcfa1e3e2960
" BHG, with respect, I think that you (as an admin) need to avoid making comments like that. ♫ "
0
0
0
0
0
0
076b8b83210b4888
Here's an example:http://insidecable.blogsome.com/2007/09/25/wolf-blitzer-shows-off-cnns-emmy-award/ That's the type of link that supports the claim.99.135.169.168
0
0
0
0
0
0
076bd717ff221fff
am i able to get a refund on my donation?
0
0
0
0
0
0
076cfda02b6963b1
) So all the sources on here saying that Ukip are centre right are wrong then. Your assumption that Ukip are right wing automatically means you are calling me right wing. I am not, my political spectrum is centralist, I do not agree with right wing party ideologies. Why would I join one? You are calling me right wing, so you will be waiting a while for your apology, when Ukip are represented in a true light and not by left leaning sources. You will get one. Next you will be telling me all the ex Labour , lib dems etc are right wing, even Reuters call us centre right: http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate-uk/2011/03/08/ukip-replacing-the-lib-dems-or-taking-on-the-tories/ Or that Lord Stodart was once Labour and former councillors that were formerly Labour such as Derrick Huckfield (Staffordshire CC). Ukip are centre right. Once again I will apologise when you with draw the remark that I am right wing, this is asserted by calling my party right wing. (
0
0
0
0
0
0
076eb44d1af16693
Revised version is much better. Thanks. - 18:28, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
077124e8d046c682
Notability of Ambridge country club A tag has been placed on Ambridge country club, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0771baae900e62cf
Confusing again I added the confusing tag, because (when I read it(, a clear set of events was not there.
0
0
0
0
0
0
077333f217a4d734
I think it might be best to take the article back to a position where jb was happy to advocate it and then proceed through comment and response at the FA. The article will soon be stable again, I should think. You made some good points, and I am sure jb would respond to them. Too many cooks spoil the broth, particularly if they don't agree on the recipe.
0
0
0
0
0
0
07740d970ffca749
" Uranus images I have just been contacted by an editor of the German Wikipedia who is translating the English Uranus article, and she would like to know if we would be kind enough to upload our remaining images onto the Wikimedia commons. Problem is, I have no idea how to upload an image onto the Wikimedia commons, so I'm not sure what to do. Could you point me in the right direction? Thanks. podous "
0
0
0
0
0
0
077427cac31a5b66
The very long discussion over st WP:SCN project talk page I have read a lot of the WP:SCN pages, and the very few have Neutrality tags. Some have OR tags but the majority seem to be NPOV. So why is the project talk page being bloated by a discussion between three Scientologists (from what I can make out have scanned all three user pages, and a lot of comments are unsigned) about how the project is biased against Elron? Would the time not be better used by going through the pages and challenging NPOV, possibly by throwing in neutrality tags and pointing out non-NPOV statements on the talk pages of those articles? After all Xenu is FA status so the NPOV cannot be too far off. As for unsigned, the comment you left after my first post was unsigned, and there were a couple of more during the discussion.
0
0
0
0
0
0
077576d0a275139a
Actually, yes, that's what I'm saying. The protection should only have a time out function to resolve pending edits on the talk page. If the current revision is the cause of the problem, you should first revert to a previous one before protecting the page, but no more than that. That you find this funny indicates that you seriously overestimate the range of sysop responsibilities.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0776a5eb40a20fa2
" Slash ""/"" and backslash ""\"" are the hands/harms and ""o"" (or ""O"" or ""0"") is the face/head or mouth. The first, ""/0\"", means frustration and the hands are on the head (hands in the hair), while the second, ""/o\"", is a smile or contemplation with both hands under its chin; if you can try this or google images search. lol – (talk • contribs) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0777b13c678927d8
"First off, modern computer-generated ornate renderings of the Paleo-Hebrew YHUH/YHWH and Modern Hebrew Tetragrammaton were added in the article, anyway. Mine were of anthropological resources [My friend, Prof. James Greenberg, University of Phoenix Anthropologist]. The ""W"" in ""YHWH"" was not intended to represent not of the ""yod"" as the ancestry but of the ancestry of Roman W back to the Aramaic U and then the Paleo Y. The transliteration of the en vowel [U] whether a [u] vowel or [ǖ] vowel, instead of [vv]or [w] consonant and the better pronunciation. (For example ability for pronunciation of the Greek letter Upsilon changed in sound-value from a [u] vowel to an umlaut or front-rounded [ǖ] vowel was relevant to the Tetragrammaton as far as the representation by many that there are no vowels in the tetragrammaton. And third, ""Yahusha"" [as in the same tetragrammaton of Yahshua ref. Strong's Concordance ""sha"" for Deliverer and ""shua"" for ""scream"" or ""cry""] does existed in Hebrew, so is NOT completely bogus as a supposed historical divine name... AnonMoos (talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0777ed58c690bd18
Both Farhad's parents are Pashtuns, not Tajiks. The majority people in Kunduz are either Pashtuns or Uzbek, Tajiks are a minority.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0779c8ac7d4e1c96
Your GA nomination of Venues of the 2016 Winter Youth Olympics Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Venues of the 2016 Winter Youth Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
0
0
0
0
0
0
077a020068616b17
Microsoft Jet What do you think now? -
0
0
0
0
0
0
077adb55353a0f6a
Stop crossposting. (robe and wizard hat)
0
0
0
0
0
0
077b1cb88c59f123
no fuckin make me fudge packer 'gwernol'[more like queerhole]
1
0
1
0
1
0
077c6b070f7ed595
" Nor have I made a legal threat. First, I am not among those three people who participated in that visit to the BLM protest. I have never known any of these people. I would not be the offended party, in any case. I've never even lived in Minnesota, or been there in over 30 years or so. (I made an airplane connection through Minneapolis in about 1985, as I vaguely recall.) I am not saying there WILL be any sort of legal proceeding; I am merely saying that to cite this claim (""heard the N-word"") risks running afoul of being libel. I think WP rules allow us to express concern that the cite of a vague assertion that somebody ""heard the N-word"" is problematic from a WP:BLP standpoint. If multiple BLM protestors claim that they heard one of the (white) visitors say the N-word, and it was cited from some reliable source, that would probably change my opinion. Can you see why this would be a different situation? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
077c6e02aa26b8c6
" This article was nominated for deletion on December 6, 2005. The result of the discussion was redirect to Beauxbatons. An archived record of this discussion can be found here."
0
0
0
0
0
0
077d22e7f6c7c212
Well, we all know where you motives lie now. Thank you for confirming.
0
0
0
0
0
0
077d7f826a4ff377
Question Hello Latics, I noticed that you revert vandalism occasionally. Would you like me to grant your account rollback rights to make vandal-fighting easier for you? Just remember that rollback, like Twinkle, should only be used to revert vandalism, and that misuse of the tool can lead to its removal. Tell me what you think. Thanks.
0
0
0
0
0
0
077dea92cfc5834e
" I'm in twothree minds over this proposal. As regards redlinks, on the one hand, over the last two years of monitoring the topic, I've seen it used as a catalyst and incubator for new articles; on the other hand, it is arguable that a death reported in a WP:RS is of a person of some note, if not necessarily within our standards. On the third hand, we do get some no-hopers on the face of it, which is why we tend to allow a month for an interested editor to create an article, and then delete undeveloped entries as non-notable. In the second case, we perhaps should not interpret lack of interest as lack of notability, because it may be that interested editors are lacking; that's why the month moratorium seems to exist, as far as I can tell. andemu "
0
0
0
0
0
0
077dffbae053f082
Another Thank You Sir, I justed wanted to express my appreciation for your willingness to hear me out in addressing the issues raised against me. I also am thankful for the thoughtful consideration of fellow admins , , and . Thanks!
0
0
0
0
0
0
078262d5a09b3023
@KWW and father F*cker, u still didnt give no source haha:P what a sore f*cking loser haha:P
1
0
1
0
1
0
078537cc29cb2665
Nuremberg Laws Hi, I noticed that you added a historical journal article as a source. I was wondering where you found that article, if you don't mind me asking. I would like to read it if I could. Thanks.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0785f1a09d7b42c0
What was classed as a severe adverse reaction? Just status epilepticus and psychosis? Is
0
0
0
0
0
0
0788465b12ef7d4c
" ""Morris engages in five types of distortion: he misrepresents documents, resorts to partial quotes, withholds evidence, makes false assertions, and rewrites original documents."" "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0788c252b0f011ee
Colombo Royal College has made , and Wikipedia administrators a bunch of Puppets with crappy rules and they all are dancing to the decent tune and tactics of this cunnig fox. 's vision is to have ONLY ONE ROYAL FOR SRI LANKA. As long as wikipedia is alive it will not be a reality. will sing posts to his own tune to eleminate and crush other legal schools in Sri Lanka with name ROYAL''. 's record is very clear and we are alive. More ROYAL on the way. Administrators enjoy the smell of ROYAL FART by and dance to the tune of from COLOMBO ROYAL COLLEGE. ROYAL DUST BIN IS SMELLY. More to come. Keep farting wide Royal Jackal Cossde''' in Royal way. Smell is so pres·tig·iously owesome. You have Harassed all Sri Lankan Royalists. - Reid Avenue turned into battlefield - Royal principal summons parents' meeting - No classes for upper school students at Royal and Thurstan - Royal, Thurstan students clash; policeman injured Royal College Panadura Battle of the Greens Royal College Wayamba, Kurunegala Battle of Wayamba Royal College Monaragala Royal College Nagoda Royal College Horana Royal College Polonnaruwa Royal College Telijjawila (77.109.139.87 ).
0
0
0
0
0
0
0788e276d96cbac0
You can't fucking block me for 3 months for fucking personal attacks or harassment! You fucking stupid hellhole, you better motherfucking let me vandalize Wikipedia again FRICKEN NOW!
1
0
1
0
1
0
078967ec96b2211b
, 1 June 2007 (UTC) Travis accepted long ago, being a diaper-fetishizing queer, that censorship is ok to avoid embarassment. He's really quite the anachronism, a goose-stepping homosexual. 23:55
0
0
0
0
0
0
07896d591890c353
"! - Favorite Cookie Also, having a little trouble to get Vandal Proof to work. I clciked 'Login' then it won't do anything. Any siy suggestions? - Favorite Cookie "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0789dd1a4e343d11
listed as the manager of Spar's grapple fixture program;
0
0
0
0
0
0
0789e0e379878463
" Dear Azure Citizen: I wrote a ""talk"" comment about a pernicious phenomenon which has infected Wikipedia in general, and this article in particular. I didn't name anyone in particular, but a group. That's not a personal attack, it's an attack on an organized effort to include propaganda in Wikiepedia. You censored me, which makes you part of the problem, not part of the solution. The solution being, ultimately, to end anonymity on Wikipedia. The PR industry has inflitrated under cover of anonymity. Strip away anonymity and they will run for cover."
0
0
0
0
0
0
0789ee63f04dff9b
" Parts of my own Talk Page deleted by editors who think they know better Dear impartial but not disinteresed reader, Coren and I have been having an entertaining and enjoyable ""discussion"" on the finer points of ""soapboxing"". She is of the firm, resolute belief that this version of my own talk page amounts to ""soapboxing"" and has deleted it. I recognize that there may be elements of soapboxing in the ""investment predictions for 2008"" section at the bottom of the page, but have given her the opportunity to amend rather than delete the whole section. She has declined the opportunity to amend, leaving me in the difficult position of having to type this with a knife pressed ever-so-gently against my back, with Coren carefully looking over my shoulder at the screen to check whether anything is, in her God-like view, ""soap-like"". Not the most pleasant position to be in, I can assure you. To use another example, picked completely at random: Let's say there's been a nasty and vicious and ugly and persistent edit war over, say, fractional reserve banking, and a number of editors want a messy but more informative version like this one kept in. Then let's say I post this earlier version on my talk page for readers to compare with the now in-my-humble-view slaughtered version. Is that ""soapboxing""?? To use another example, closer to home. Let's say a guy like Zenwhat says to his co-conspirators, ""What can we do to have OUR version of debt-based monetary system/fractional reserve banking prevail?"", like he clearly said here under the (desperate?) heading ""Heeeeelp"". And then he also (bizarrely?) asks Gregalton help him delete references to Mises.org like he did here, saying to Gregalton: ""Also, in case you're interested, one of the easiest ways to find economics articles that have been vandalized is to do a search for links to Mises.org"" As if a reference to the great Ludwig von Mises amounted to VANDALISM? Can you BELIEVE IT? I have to hold a pencil between my teeth just to keep control of myself and keep typing this. The guy is clearly a vicious tiny weeny little troll. He also says to his co-conspirator the following, on the same page: ""I looked at the fractional reserve banking article recently and saw how it was so horribly vandalized. It made me realize that we're going around in circles. We improve the articles to the point that they look great. Then they get screwed up again. So, I had an idea: Would you be interested in helping me write an essay on ""Monetary Crankery""? It could help people who AREN'T educated...The idea is for it to be straightforward, with references, but polemic and satirical of monetary crankery."" Clearly this guy is obsessed with deleting or ""satirizing"" any positions on monetary theory that don't agree with his. (The guy is mad. If the guy had napalm or nukes he'd use them without hesitation.) Then, for good measure, he goes back to debt-based monetary system to do more ""editing"". Zenwhat is clearly a piece of work. Check out the dude's talk page. In addition to his obsessive interest in deleting anything associated with Mises.org, his main interests appear to be something called ""cannabis culture"" and ""the Buddhist connection with marijuana"". So, I gather from this that his main ""interests"" are monetary theory and dope smoking. What a combo! Seeing this, I ponder my options. I decide to post a note here, ON MY OWN TALK PAGE, asking readers to compare older (better?) versions of some important articles on monetary theory with the current versions. For good measure I offer my predictions on the financial markets for 2008 as a gift to the (eight?) people persistent enough to read my humble little talk page. It immediately gets deleted by all-seeing, all-knowing Coren as ""soapboxing"". Is this strict compliance with WP guidelines or a WP-style Fascist Dictatorship where people like Coren delete at will, but don't bother to make CONSTRUCTIVE suggestions as to how what I have written CAN come within the guidelines? This is like watching evolution in reverse. I carefully construct a page with the help of others. It gets vandalized by those WITH A CLEAR AND OBVIOUS objective to delete or satirize all references to Ludwig von Mises or the Austrian School (who knows what motivates these sickos?). Instead of engaging in pointless edit wars with idiots, I ask t
0
0
0
0
0
0
0789ff49e3dd621a
Buying a lotto ticket doesn't count either, or does it? I've presented a logical argument with a full half of the glyphs uncontested. Perhaps this counts for something...
0
0
0
0
0
0
078a55f6f805af5b
I'm sorry, but there simply is no credibility to any of these allegations. The Polish Workers' Party received only 25% of the seats which was below what the the Communists of France received in 1946. The results of the elections I posted exclusively contain those elections which were free and fair.
0
0
0
0
0
0
078a7beb1a1be141
" BELOW IS THE ZAFARNAMAH (a religious letter of victory) by GURU GOBIND SINGH JI Out of 111 verses 1)34 verses are in the praise of AKAL PURAKH WAHEGURU 2)32 verses deals with Aurangzeb 's invitation for the Guru to meet him and the Guru's refusal to meet Aurangzeb - instead the Guru asks him (Aurangzeb) to visit him. 3)24 verses deals with the detail events that took place during the BATTLE OF CHAMKAUR (December,1704) 4)15 verses reprove Aurangzeb for breaking promises given by him and his agents (Nawab Wazir Khan, Raja Ajmer chand and other hilly rajas) 5)6 verses deals with the praise of Aurangzeb. In the verse 78 and 79 Guru Gobind singh also had warned Aurangzeb that KHALSA will not rest until the evil empire is destroyed. '''''''''ZAFARNAMAH (a religious letter of victory) written by GURU GOBIND SINGH to MUGHAL EMPEROR AURANGZEB. 1)The Lord is perfection personified.He is eternal and manifests himself through his miracles.He is generous in granting his bounties.He is merciful and delivers us from the world. 2)He grants peace and security and is always merciful in forgiving us for our sins.He holds our hand and guides us.He is provider of our sustenance and charms everyone. 3)Lord is the king of kings who is guiding us all the time.He showers his benevolence on all.He is without colour, incomparable and formless. 4)He possesses no material things nor has he an army.He is merciful and grants all the pleasures of the heavens. 5)The pure one is above everything in this universe.His glory is all pervasive.He bestows us with gifts.He is present everywhere. 6)The merciful Lord grants us all the gifts and meets the needs of everyone throughout the world. 7)He is Lord of the universe.He is merciful and provides sustenance to all.His charm andd grandeur cannot be matched by anyone. 8)The Lord is intelligence personified.He protects the poor and the helpless and destroys the wicked. 9)The virtuous one gives justice to all.Nothing is hidden from him.He is the inspiration of Quran. 10)The all-knowing Lord seeks the learned.He is aware of all happenings.He is present everywhere. 11)He has the knowledge of everything in this universe.All cosmos is moving as per his command. 12)The great Lord is regulating everything in the world about which he has complete knowledge. 13)Aurangzeb ! I have no trust in your oaths anymore. (you have written that) God is one and that he is witness (between us). 14)I don't have trust even equivalent to a drop of water in your generals (Wazir Khan, nawab of Sirhind Punjab, Raja Ajmer chand (rajput hilly king) and other hilly kings who came to me with oaths of Quran and cow that I will be given safe passage out of Anandgarh fort. But they all were telling lies 15) If anyone trusts you on your oaths of Quran that person is bound to be doomed in the end. 16)If anyone comes under the shadow of Huma bird, no one can lay its hands on it-not even a brave cow. 17)If a man sits behind the back of a lion neither anyone can catch him nor a goat or a sheep or a deer can even pass nearby. (Aurangzeb ! I stand in shadow of the Almighty and your men who are like goats,sheep and deer could not harm me inspite of your deceptions.) 18)If I had deceived by taking oath on Holy Quran like the way you have done, I would not have bought my dear fighters to this position of disadvantage (by bringing them out of Anandgarh fort). IN VERSES FROM 19 TO 41 BELOW, GURU SAHIB GAVE AN ACCOUNT OF THE BATTLE OF CHAMKAUR FOUGHT ON 22ND DECEMBER,1704 AND THE REASONS THAT FORCED HIM TO TAKE UP THE SWORD AGAINST THE MUGHALS AND HILLY RAJPUT KINGS 19)what can 40 hungry men do when suddenly 10 lakh (one million) strong army pounces upon them ? 20)That the promise breakers launched a surprise attack with their swords, arrows and guns. 21)It was out of sheer helplessness that I came in the battle field.(Having thus decided) I came with all the battle plans and munitions. 22)When all stratagem employed for (solving) a problem are exhausted, only then taking your hand to the sword is legitimate. (This is the most quoted of Zafarnamah.300 years ago, Guru Gobind singh ji had laid down the circumstances when a person or a nation can pick up the sword against the other) 23)What trust can I have on your oath on Quran ? Otherwise you tell why should I have taken path of taking up the sword. 24)I do not know that this person (Aurangzeb) is cunning like a fox.Otherwise I would never have come to this place that is Chamkaur (by vacating Anandgarh on the false oaths of Aurangzeb and his men). 25)If any person believes an oath on Quran ,he should neither be tied (arrested) nor killed.
0
0
0
0
0
0