id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
08e5721fe02f4e40
" User:Metalvayne and blocking/topic ban Hi Berean Hunter. A week ago, you blocked msg me "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08e57b8d25b56fef
" I second this. If you have sources which talk about the importance of Konigsberg to Old Prussians and Masurians (the stuff on Lithuanians can be combined with the stuff on the Poles - and I already proposed changing the name of the section to ""Poles and Lithuanians in Konigsberg"") then please add them and I'll try to help with that myself. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08e6c3d5f20aca71
" Hmmm... that's exactly what pedophiles do; use the Internet to communicate in order to obtain a ""great deal of pleasure."" "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08e737ace8effc43
—Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) 17:01, 3 August 2008 Fuck off.
1
0
0
0
0
0
08e9d3df133ece1d
" Neffe's son Jalen We Love Cole About this "" http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Keyshia_Cole&diff;=next&oldid;=199765396. Do u know y Neffe gave her son the name Cole & not her last name or his dad's last name ? 70.108.92.126 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08eaeb72277704df
Nope, you can't use the situation as a sort of blackmail to behave inappropriately. I won't allow you to because I am going on vacation for the month of December anyway. I don't really care what is wearing thin with you. Your butting in with threats is inappropriate. I won't put up with the blackmail either. You CHOSE to get involved on Hybrid's talk page and start trouble and that's what you got. Bye!
0
0
0
0
0
0
08ec897ae9d432ac
" Yes I had this SAME problem: Some WikiNazis feel it's OK to leave nasty / snarky comments on other user pages, but will actually delete such comments from their own pages calling it ""vandalism"". Hypocrites. GET THE FUCK OFF METROS BECAUSE YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO LOCK THIS TALKPAGE UP AND ITS MINE AND ALSO FUCK OFF MY USERPAGE WHEN I DELETE THE CONCERN FOR TOUGHHEAD TEMPLATE! YOU ARE NOT FIT TO BE ADMIN AND INSTEAD MAYBE MR DUCKY SHOULD BE YOUR REPLACEMENT!(76.247.222.101 )"
1
0
1
0
1
0
08ede0dd6d1765db
Interesting. Just dig around in Wikipedia and with luck you might be able to find a lot about someone who's vandalizing a page. You can also find the history of anyone who has been mucking about in Wikipedia. I just dug up some interesting background on one of the muckers on the Poppers page. =)
0
0
0
0
0
0
08edec2fed992eee
" The link directly above says where it's copied from. talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08efa5766c67ddc8
Zoo Tycoon 2 I should really think before saying things. I kind of accused you for being rude at that guy. I won't do that again. I'm sorry.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08efbe9f80f86780
Yeah, he said he'd never heard of Ferrara, what a crook, the name bad lieutenant just appeared to him in a german sausage.
1
0
0
0
0
0
08efc5af1f2d342a
IGNORANT FOOL...YOU'VE NEVER EVEN SEEN A MAP OF KRASNOI You are so stupid and ignorant that you don’t even know which roads lead into or out of Krasnoi. The road leading west out of Krasnoi was never blocked by the Russians…it was threatened by Tormasov’s enveloping movement but never actually blocked. Your ignorance is disgusting…absolutely sickening... Dumb freshman with low SAT's...that's what you are... kenmore
1
0
1
0
1
0
08f01049b4474baf
Giving links You only confirmed - in Lithuania is used lithuanized version. I knew this, but this is English WP. What's the reason of transliteration?
0
0
0
0
0
0
08f0152c53a26888
I'm not sure what your position is. To clarify it, answer these four yes or no questions: 1. Do you think the Moon's orbit is concave inward? 2. Do you think the Moon's orbit is concave outward? 3. Do you think the Moon's orbit is convex inward? 4. Do you think the Moon's orbit is convex outward? -
0
0
0
0
0
0
08f03d7466936ee5
" Request for help An unregistered editor from a single static IP address is repeatedly trying to remove a section called ""reputation"" in the article about the Southwestern University School of Law. I've tried to reason with him/her on his/her talk page (see ""Let's Talk"") but s/he doesn't seem to want to respond. He has also posted some nonsensical things on my own talk page in response to my reversions, in which s/he claims ownership of the article. Could you try talking to him/her? I'm really not sure how to handle this. Thanks. // JoshKagan Jrkagan | talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08f0e8737bbb8da7
"== Sorry! == Hi Kukuwesene2004, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! (talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08f10036f95c9be6
An ass. LOL. The vandalism was about goaste. 96.48.13.234
1
0
1
0
0
0
08f290a3bc6afdda
Following up on Cheetham and Winkler (2011: 372) as cited, it's not clear to me that Mr. Rashid's comments would meet a high standard of inclusion, either as an academic or as an Islamic jurist. This isn't enough to say that Muslims argue anything; stating that Rashid argues it would just expose its triviality. I'm going to remove the whole passage unless a better foundation can be found for this discussion (as for all I know one can.)
0
0
0
0
0
0
08f2e516bb5dea81
Hello there, you still around??? hey, was just hoping that you may still visit here? please leave a message if you are ).
0
0
0
0
0
0
08f33c885a3077e2
. Please read my reply
0
0
0
0
0
0
08f3cc32e4404699
Are you a paid PR & small time editor of these fake women LOL who potray false info on Wikipedia misleading people! Going by your name you sound japanese! So what do you know about lakshmi manchu? She was born in Modugulapalem in chittoor on October-8th-1970 married twice! Just go research your facts first and make an effort to publish some true facts instead of deleting the truth. How pitiful! Also it is not allowed to hVd wiki pages without DOB so go find your facts first Yamaguchi or whoever u are!
0
0
0
0
0
0
08f4270aad0adde8
UNBELIEVABLE you went ahead and removed the section unilaterally without waiting from comments from other editors. I'm warning you Wee, abstain from any more disruptive and borderline vandalism editing.
1
0
0
0
0
0
08f45c484c2b13ca
You are free to read WP:NPA. You are also free to read this 2004 version. The core reasoning why it's an attack is in both versions.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08f484a8ca148096
Weasel words aren't sources. The article doesn't cite any.12.195.103.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
08f568b7ff05affc
" Strongly opposed. Whoever says Britain is ""multinational""? It would look too much like someone trying to push a political agenda, specifically one which pretends that there is no British nation. We cannot let ourselves fall into that trap. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08f56a1c2bcf440f
So because Edwards views Duke favorably, and Blitzer doesn't, that changes the fact that Duke has appeared on both of their programs? Hmm. Interesting logic.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08f5c4e56ecab0f0
" And you guys really, actually have no sense of humour? Like as in really?!?! I thought that was just something people said about ""oh so serious"" sciency types, especially those foolish enough to pound upon equine corpses endlessly. Odd thing is I'm a sciency type with shitloads (not just a little.. SHITLOADS) of publicly recognized credibility to back it up (anyone interested in proof of that need only message me privately somehow, I'd be glad to let you in on the experience that is ""Lazord00d"".. if I like you..) and I definitely have a sense of humour it's one of my favorite traits. Man you guys are grey and lifeless if this is any indicator. And my experience as a sciency type d00d is in the actual real world.. you know, the place where you have to look people in the eye when you debunk their ridiculous opinion theories (brain farts are what I like to call them.. fits better than the usual meaning most of the time lol) with verifiable fact. Never had a problem with that.. you? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08f5f110b6acc437
Re your message: I suggested that you bring up the issues you have with the article on the talk page because then you can discuss the issue with other interested editors on fixing specific things. If you bring it up, somebody will likely respond to you and work with you regarding the issues that you bring up. As for why the Muslim article is protected, since I was not involved in setting the protection, I don't have an opinion on it. Again, if you have an issue with the article, bring it up on the article's talk page.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08f72bd92731e7b6
this track listing is NOT from this films soundtrack
0
0
0
0
0
0
08f74f35e479e3e6
" Northern Lights something.... Your names to long. It's exactly that kind of unthinking response - ""oh don't attack other editors"". How then is someone supposed to call a liar a liar? If you check up on Jehochman you will find that it was demonstrated that he deliberately lied with the intention of misleading. Yet he is still here. Check that one, I'll show you the lies of the others."
0
0
0
0
0
0
08f877b8f44d2410
Blocked because PeterSymonds is a Douchebag (see image)
0
0
0
0
0
0
08f8e88716e74219
" The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV (April 2007) The April 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by Article moves Could you explain your move on Talk:152 mm ML-20 field howitzer? In general it is good practice to propose a move on talk first to allow interested Wikipedians to express their opinion about it. I have answered there. The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007) The May 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by Battleships et al Hi MoRsE - just wanted to draw your attention to the discussion on separating the Dreadnought section out from [[Battleship[[ - see the bottom of Talk:Battleship for more details! Many regards, The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007) The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by American Holland class submarines On 12 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with from the article American Holland class submarines, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. (t)⁄(c) •  Spirit of St. Louis M. MoRsE, there is a newbie editor that has insisted that the flight of the Spirit of St. Louis was the first non-stop flight across the Atlantic and has constantly reverted the article to eliminate the word ""solo"". He has not responded to the discussion page or to the note left on his ""talk"" page. These are his only contributions to Wiki articles and he continues to make spurious claims, see: He will not stop the reverting although he has been politely informed that constant reversions without explanation on the discussion page is not considered appropriate. Asking for help here. Thanks . I put the article on my watch list and I'll keep an eye on it. The ""solo"" thing is significant. Name Ristitaipale Stop delete old finnish names from article Körsnäs. I know that you are swedish and you wanna distroy old finnish name of Korsnäs history. 83.102.5.106 / 130.233.243.229 Hello, As you might be aware, the aforementioned (at the very most) two editors insist on continually vandalising not only the article on Korsnäs, but additionally the articles on Kökar and Lemland. In so doing, 83.102.5.106 violated WP:3RR for both Lemland (see here and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08fa85962ad15d6a
" Get your facts right You wrote this on revision history ""nonsense, majority of that was cited to 1906 and 1967, you are at 3rr back off and work at talk"" check the references properbly. Sleeboom, Margaret. Academic Nations in China and Japan. Routledge: UK, 2004. ISBN 0-415-31545-X p.56 Takeru Akazawa and Emóke J.E. Sathmåry. Prehistoric Mongoloid dispersals. New York, Oxford University Press, 1996 So who's being nonsense now? (Talk) 12:35, 29 2012 March 2012(UTC)"
0
0
0
0
0
0
08fa9ad423852d6e
" Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Beck  (talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08face192b33c2cb
" I did not say I agreed with them. But I draw attention to the fact that the people you malign – Shupe, Bromley, Barker, Wilson, Introvigne, Lewis, Richardson, Palmer, Wessinger, Ammerman, Melton, Tabor, Gallagher, Chryssides, etc., are leading scholars in this field, writing for top university presses, and that their views are in the majority in the field. 466 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08fd430afeeeae2f
My actions are not disruptive. Why you're saying this is way over reason to explain since I've provided plenty of reliable sources, I am not vandalizing, and I tried to reach a resolution with the author. Therefore, YOU DO NOT know what you're talking about. You're in danger of being re-evaluated by wiki if you continue to defend a sperson who clearly is too stubborn to work with others on wiki and who deletes VERY reliable sources. Such action speaks little about you as a wiki volunteer. I urge that you to cease defending this person for whatever personal reasons you may have and be a true wiki volunteer. Otherwise, I'll be forced to request that wiki block you, and I would not want that and neither do you.
0
0
0
0
0
0
08fe1ad79b66c782
" Thank you for wearing mesh underwear to bed last night You were amazing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08ff12e57af713d8
" DYK Did you know? was updated. On 25 May, 2007, from the article snakeskin gourami, which you recently nominated, been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
08ff307d7d98ce9b
Possible images So I just removed a huge Mate1 ad from the article, because in my opinion (although I believe it was added in good faith by User:KRW), it's inappropriate for an article about a general product or service to feature prominently the advertising or image of one single product within the class. Some examples I looked at included: Soft Drink where the main picture shows a variety of brands on a supermarket shelf (with a photo of the Diet Pepsi product line much lower down) Potato chip where two of the three pictures are of chips without packaging, and the third is a non-current ad Fast food where all of the food is shown unwrapped (and only the Big Mac is clearly identifiable), plus a nondescript interior photo and a photo of several adjacent restaurants Chocolate bar with an unwrapped chocolate bar shown. This brings up a quandry: what do we use for images? My best ideas are to make mockups of a hypothetical dating site front page or ad and use them instead of real images. Suggestions?
0
0
0
0
0
0
08fffaa6e1d26884
who is this n y shld we
0
0
0
0
0
0
0901a2ff29904fb3
Tesla was a Serb, born in Croatia. The article is not objective, and I think objectivity is important. One harmless example of that is presenting banknote of Serbia with his image and not presenting the croatian one. Apparently this wiki page is edited by serbian wiki page, and that's why it's not objective. I suggest that the page should be edited by another wiki project. That's how we will stop counting Tesla's blood cells and manipulating with the history. Give Tesla in the hands of neutral party. Thanks.
0
0
0
0
0
0
09020f5eba512d4e
Probably be better for you just to drop it.
0
0
0
0
0
0
090273edb99f539e
Thanks for caring and everything but uhh dont. The page does not need to be deleted and I dont know anyother way to fix that other than getting rid of that warning junk. So find someone else to bother alright?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0902e32a5664236c
Complete bull. Oakland hasn't made the playoffs since 2006. Their draft picks have failed miserably, and Baseball America has ranked their farm system 27, 25, 29, 30 19, 22 since then. Other teams have taken a moneyball element or two but never to the extreme that the A's did. 76.100.195.188
0
0
0
0
0
0
09033bd28bc8af77
Naw lets just keep it here for now
0
0
0
0
0
0
090395c250ba1c47
"Maybe if several users report the same person, the administrators then understand the severity of the user's vandalism...  Msg me  My contribs  "
0
0
0
0
0
0
09052fb76286567a
, 27 April 2006 (UTC) The Game is an abstract mental game, the objective of which is to forget its existence. There is no point in calling The Game a meme, the majority of stuff on Wikipedia is a meme. A meme is simply any idea or concept. I think what this refers to is a common misconception of the word meme, basically meaning a fad. The Game has some interesting memetic properties, but these should be described elsewhere in the article if anywhere. Whoever wants the meme version up should read the meme article first. 11:04
0
0
0
0
0
0
0905680b9c1c1d94
" I think red tape accurately and succinctly communicates the situation you describe, especially given that in a prior version you yourself wrote Attempts to rectify this situation working through official channels did not work which it seems to me is the very essence of (extreme) red tape. If you like we can say instead official indifference or unresponsiveness, but I don't see how that better informs the reader. I also don't see how your wording makes the point you mention re success in decrypting and the importance of that success. Obviously a request for more resources will try to convince the recipient that such will help the writers to better do what they've been tasked to do. To spell out that their desire was ""to achieve the productivity that was possible"" would be completely superflous of course that was the goal. And surely no reader needs to be told that better productivity / faster decrypting / etc. meant the entire difference between valuable intelligence and useless retrospective. Your wording doesn't mention any of that stuff anyway. Further (as I've said before) I also don't see why it matters what specific type of resource was lacking the important points are: (a) the codebreakers felt that they could not do the best job possible without more resources; (b) Churchill unhesitatingly granted them carte blanche, showing the importance he attached to their work and the breadth of his authority in making such decisions. What doesn't matter is just what it was that was lacking typists? paperclips? light bulbs? Some of these elements could be incorporated to enliven the narrative e.g. some kind of ""for want of a nail""-type angle ""Look, Prime Minister, you've gathered all these first-class minds here but we can't get anything done because we have to do our own bloody TYPING!"" if sources lay something like that out. Am I missing something? P.S. What do you mean about WP:CIV?"
0
0
0
0
0
0
090568b1d4264f0e
" None: Beefart replies Thanks for you comments. Few take the time to discuss grammar on Wikipedia and it shows in many articles. I disagree with you about 'none'. The word comes from the Old Norse ne an, which means, literally ""no one"". In my view, to get the sense of any usage of 'none' we must expand it in our minds to ""no one"". It is impossible to say ""no one are dinosaurs"". It has to be ""no one is a dinosaur"". Here are two examples from the OED: (E.J. Howard): Except for her eyes, none of her features was remarkable. (P. Rose): People sought her... but none was a companion. HOWEVER, the plot thickens, because the OED also gives this example from Graham Greene, who is highly regarded as a writer: None of our wives are invited. This flies in the face of the first two examples and suggests that the OED has given up the fight. Maybe I ought to as well ) ). There are of course some situations where expanding ""none"" to ""no one"" does not make any sense as either a singular or a plural. (e.g. None of the increase is due to...). Here the best we can hope for is to propose that ""none"" is a synonym for ""nothing"". I personally try to avoid expressions such as ""None of the increase"" and would be inclined to write ""No part of the increase""... "
0
0
0
0
0
0
09075dc52ef9210f
" I can help you create an RFC, but you need to propose a neutrally-worded sentence saying what change you want to make. Do you want to add: ""Yemen was home of the Sabaeans (biblical Sheba), a trading state that flourished for over a thousand years"". You can propose this in the RfC, but people who have commented so far are unlikely to support that. You would be hoping that the listing of the RfC would bring in more contributors who might agree with you. It sounds like the current contributors want everything to be extremely well-sourced to respected scholarship, and they don't want anything said beyond what is known for sure. E.g. they doubt that we know the exact location of the Sabaeans. You have been writing at excessive length and this discourages dialog. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0907dc323e7cc9c1
Help clarify an artice: John Stark I was looking for information on John Stark and came across a confusing section. In the part about his early life, there is a paragraph that reads: On April 28, 1752, while on a hunting and trapping trip along the Baker River, a tributary of the Pemigewasset River, he was captured by Abenaki warriors and brought back to Canada but not before warning his brother William to paddle away in his canoe, though David Stinson was killed. While a prisoner of the Abenaki, he and his fellow prisoner Amos Eastman were made to run a gauntlet of warriors armed with sticks. The problem is that there is no mention of who David Stinson is, only that he was killed. I see that an edit you made (10:57, 2006 January 25‎) removed some clarification on him, instead identifying Amos Eastman as the fellow prisoner. As you have better knowledge on the subject, can you please put back some info identifying him? (or possibly remove the unclear info??) Thanks,
0
0
0
0
0
0
09082a774c6bbba3
. Island says 160m including TEOM for Mariah- so that's about it. Music Box can't possibly have sold 23M outside the US. This would mean 17M outside Europe and the US- never happened in the history of music (not even Thriller has such sales outside these two markets, and it went #1 basically everywhere for months, a lot more than can be said for Music Box) It was a huge hit, but not to that extent. Adding all the markets in teh world apart from a tiny handful (0.005% of teh world or so) Music Box adds up to about 20M or so
0
0
0
0
0
0
090a0d1ebb5d71b8
" The Truth about the 1986 Sinn Féin Ard Fheis The story of how Gerry Adams tried to turn an eighty year old revolutionary movement into a British Constitutional party. How he broke the Sinn Féin constitution, created fake cumainn to give him fake votes and barred life long republicans from voting. How he managed to expel himself and his supporters from Sinn Féin membership. And, how a small band of republicans managed to keep the Sinn Féin constitution and traditional policy in tact. In 1986 Section 1b. of the Sinn Féin constitution read as follows: “No person who is a member of any political party organisation or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who, if elected, intend taking part in the proceedings of the Westminster or partitionist 26-County or 6-County parliaments or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who sign any form or give any kind of written or verbal undertaking of intention to take their seats in these institutions, shall be admitted to membership or allowed to retain membership."" The Adams leadership put forward a motion, titled Resolution 162, at the 1986 Ard Fheis. Its wording was as follows: RESOLUTION 162 THAT this Ard-Fheis drops its abstentionist attitude to Leinster House. Successful Sinn Fein parliamentary candidates in 26-County elections: a. Shall attend Leinster House as directed by the Ard Chomhairle. b. Shall not draw their salaries for personal use. (Parliamentary representatives shall be paid a Sinn Fein organiser’s subsidy, and the Leinster House salary shall be divided at the direction of the Ard Chomhairle to defray national and constituency expenses.) To accommodate this change, the Constitution and Rules be amended as follows: That Section 1b of the Constitution be amended to read: No person who is a member of any political party organisation or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who, if elected, intend taking part in the proceedings of the Westminster or partitionist 6-County parliaments or who approves of or supports the candidature of persons who sign any form or give any kind of written or verbal undertaking of intention to take their seats in these institutions, shall be admitted to membership or allowed to retain membership. Motion 162 supports and approves of the candidature of persons who, if elected, would be of the intention to take their seats in certain circumstances i.e. on the direction of the Ard Chomhairle. Obviously, Motion 162 infringes Section 1b. Section 1b. was in effect at the time this Resolution was presented. Its clear that Adams made a mistake in procedure. He should have sought a majority decision to amend Section 1b. in 1986 and returned in 1987 to propose entering Leinster House. Trying to amend Section 1b. and propose taking seats in the “partitionist 26-County Parliament” in the same Resolution was a logical impossibility. Can anybody say that the wording: “That this Ard-Fheis drops its abstentionist attitude to Leinster House. Successful Sinn Fein parliamentary candidates in 26-County elections: a. Shall attend Leinster House as directed by the Ard Chomhairle” does not constitute the supporting and approving of the candidature of persons who intend to take their seats in Leinster House as directed by the Ard Chomhairle? Clearly Adams was in breach of Section 1b. and according to that section he had expelled himself, and all those who voted for Resolution 162. Brian Feeney, in his book, Sinn Féin 100 Turbulent Years, puts forward the argument that Adams had managed to bypass Section 1b, by introducing a motion in 1983 allowing the “discussion” of any aspect of the Sinn Féin constitution. This change may indeed have facilitated debate on abstentionism but it did not infringe on the content or effect of Section 1b in any way. To discuss something is not the same as formally proposing or supporting it. For example, conventions are held regularly where drug addiction is discussed without any of the delegates proposing or supporting it. In fact the line Adams added in 1983 was superfluous, as the Sinn Féin constitution had never banned the “discussion” of anything – just the “approving” and “supporting” of taking seats in named partitionist parliaments. Of course its not illegal to amend or remove section 1b. Section 1b. bans the approval or support of candidates who intend to take seats in British assemblies. It can be removed or amended at any Ard Fheis by a two thirds majority. The reason for doing so could be many. Perhaps delegates might feel that it implies that they cannot be trusted to be loyal to the Republic. In fact its not necessary, according to the constitution, to give any reason. But you
0
0
0
0
0
0
090a3ace0c04ec8e
" Welcome Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address () is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! "
0
0
0
0
0
0
090a477a89b4d22b
Agreed and done.
0
0
0
0
0
0
090e00bcb23c2cc1
" Curious as to why you want to be a busybody with me I am curious as to why you want to be a busybody with me - I've noticed you following me around before. For example, in the entries for Michel David-Weill (whom I am sure you know nothing about) and Edouard Stern (whom I am also sure you know nothing about), I made minor edits yet you reversed them for being ""uncited"" . . . . . even though the entire bios are totally uncited. What's your beef? Why don't you delete the entire article? I know the subject matter, you don't. It has something to do with me - you desire some sort of association with me - I feel as if I am being stalked - normally stalking is done by the opposite sex, but in this case you're a man chasing a man. I had another Wiki administrator do this, and on his home page he admits that he is a ""flaming homosexual"". Don't tell me you too."
0
0
0
0
0
0
090e1a88f2b2345e
thanks.Will keep in mind
0
0
0
0
0
0
090e28caad25c26e
" Section needs to be edited This line about New Hampshire is not very accurate: On January 17, 2000, for the first time, Martin Luther King Day was officially observed in all 50 states.[4] Prior to that New Hampshire and Arizona did not observe the day. In fact, New Hampshire passed ""Civil Rights Day"" in 1991, to honor Dr King, and other civil rights activists like Rosa Parks and Malcolm X. Since the article states clearly that other states, such as Utah, have different names for the holiday, including combining it with Confederate military heroes, this sentence does not seem justifiable. The article leaves the impression that New Hampshire was some sort of bigoted state, that was one of the last to recognize this holiday. I am a newbie to Wikipedia, how do we fix this?"
0
0
0
0
0
0
090e857cf789b5e2
Crusader States Thank you for fixing an obvious mistake. I was just wondering...What was the relationship between the Holy Roman Empire and Latin Empire? Do you have any worthwhile resources? 08:33, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
090f17e3742e57d0
any longer, I'm sure both editors here will come to some sort of compromise )
0
0
0
0
0
0
090f45421f26c8e4
First off, I'm a Benfica supporter. It's clear Sporting are not too much of a club but despite being hummiliated (and that's not saying enough) frequently over the past few years, looking at the league tables from the past seasons and at their achievements it's clear Benfica have become the 3rd Giant. However this may change this season... ;)
0
0
0
0
0
0
090f7e607282471e
Hi, Cyta. It's bad practice, I know, but it can and does happen in some scholarly journals, on the assumption that specialist shall speak unto specialist, and the rest can go to the devil! I wasn't aware that The English Historical Review, which I used extensively during my own research, was a particular offender, but my main period of study is the seventeenth century, by which time Latin had all but disappeared from official documents.
0
0
0
0
0
0
09108c6c6619e632
League of Copyeditors participation drive! Dear League member, We've started a participation drive for the remainder of February. If you can, please help clear the backlog by adopting the following goals each week: Select an article to copy-edit from the backlog. After your copy-edit, list the article in the articles ready for final proofread section. Select a different article to proofread from the articles ready for final proofread section. Thanks for your help! Journalist
0
0
0
0
0
0
091113d3ca422637
MY REPLY You must be kidding, I didn't edit a single thing, the only thing I did was compare edits made by other users, not mine
0
0
0
0
0
0
091168eca312dde6
" The Fool Hi Seth: I noticed that you removed some info from The Fool as possible copyvio; an anon just added the text back. I've given him a ""just so you know"" note on his talk page, but could you provide a link to where you think the copyvio is from so I can list it on Wikipedia:Copyright problems? · Talk 05:47, July 10, 2005 (UTC)"
0
0
0
0
0
0
091190d9e81adb77
and for the capitalize thing actually its not bad grammer if your using it in titles... You need a lesson from your Teacher Matt Stiker... Lol J/k ... But Seriously though if me calling other people gay offends you... you have to be a total nerd in real life that can't take being called names... oh well i feel sorry for you... wikipedia is probably the most action you get besides your creeper sites you visit...
1
0
0
0
0
0
0914cded3ef87d69
" Dispute Resolution What dispute resolution you are talking about? It is regarding a comment in wikipedia space, dispute resolution applies when the dispute is regarding article mainspace. '''''' "
0
0
0
0
0
0
091509827a2fb431
I second that. This perfectly illustrates how I explain it to my friends also, at least when I force them to listen to me talk about N dimensions ) I noticed the X and Y colors in your legend did not match the illustrations, so I uploaded a new version that corrects this (:File:Dimension levels.svg). I hope that's ok with you. I don't know what graphics editor you used, but I just fixed it with a text editor to preserve the readability of the file by your original editor.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0915191e5f7ff4af
" talkback from 78.26 part2 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
09151a8222622333
Bold textLondon against Camden Danger Lab
0
0
0
0
0
0
09167ed3e28e1512
Nice suck up to the admins there... You know all you have to do to get me to shut up about this is show me where it says in the WP:MoS or wherever on Wikipedia that it says episode table widths must be 70% wide. Show me that, or where people with 1024 x whatever screen resolution are stating that this table width is a problem for them. That's all I ask.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0917457cd9b2d14c
" Happy New Year Happy New Year! I'd have an image but it would probably be the one on your userpage. Do you mind if I totally steal lovingly rip off your navigation bar?? I really like it...teh tennisman"
0
0
0
0
0
0
0917afd348a7f7c8
Why is it so shocking that the Meredith Kercher article is getting attention? It's a highly controversial case. All of this SPA and sock talk is unsupported and ridiculous.
0
0
0
0
0
0
09184005085bfc5b
" I've never seen ""creative director"" used in the infobox for TV shows, because ""creative director"" is not a title actually held by someone, at least in fictional series, to the best of my knowledge. It is production designer, and that's what they're credited as. It also looks quite odd in the infobox, where you have someone who is the production designer listed so high in the infobox, just below the creator and above more notable roles such as the cast and executive producers. This is a good topic of discussion for Template:Infobox television, that ""creative_director"" should be changed to ""production_designer"" in the infobox and then moved into the ""Production"" portion of the infobox, along with other similar crew roles. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
09184bcda06ab04d
Antisemites being protected from Jews... geez, has anyone else seen that pig flying nearby? I also heard it's snowing in hell -)
1
0
0
0
0
0
09186d58eabae098
This article was unprotected on September 22 and has seen significant positive contributions since thenmost of those positive contributions have been from IPs, which I think vindicates the removal of semiprotection. TS
0
0
0
0
0
0
091b4b06f15bca60
Image copyright problem with Image:23rd February 2008 3.jpg Thank you for uploading Image:23rd February 2008 3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ()(Talk)
0
0
0
0
0
0
091b4fb4d0ff78bb
Fraggle81 == I can just make new accounts every time I want to attack you. Proxy. Faggot. ==
1
0
1
0
1
0
091b5f147799ed12
"Doherty epilogue== Why does the section ""5 Mainstream scholarly reception"" end in a comment by Doherty, himself decidedly not a part of that mainstream, which basically says that someone else should come along. Isn't this akin to a proponent of a minority view saying that one day (oh happy day) the majority will come to see the wisdom of the minority view and change its mind. Revision and changing minds are an essential part of all branches of scholarship but why should we give a platform to any one view in this? (smile back) Well... I do see your point... but I think there's arguably validity in assigning a special preference to the view of the subjects of the article, of which Doherty is a notable example, and the only one (I'm aware) that has commented on the subject. =="
0
0
0
0
0
0
091c15f58a77ea0d
I think it is from an AFD close, noted. '''''' talk
0
0
0
0
0
0
091e0ef032b84f02
" Addendum: royal.gov.uk used to have a feature whereby people could write in with questions. That seems to have disappeared, but there is contact information for the Public Information Office under the 'contacts' link from the main page there. Perhaps someone more local to Buck House could ring them, ask, and see whether they'd be happy publishing such information on the website so we could then use it as a reference. I'd rather not inflate my phone bill with transatlantic phonecalls. →  ₪ "
0
0
0
0
0
0
091e7283b94cddda
Kent Engel Peer Review: Good start to the article, everything seemed to conform to the manual of style so far. One thing that I found was the name Dolan was spelled incorrectly once in the article. All of the links seem to take me to the right place and add credibility to your article. Just make sure you site sources and proofread and you should be good!
0
0
0
0
0
0
09202f14415aafe5
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please stop inserting unsourced, libelous allegations about a living person in Paul McKee (developer) or your IP address will be blocked. You may not receive any further warnings.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0920e3730f4216f3
I think this should go in the Titz n' Azz section of wikipedia.org. It is only fitting that an article of this calibre be placed there. Nonetheless, the accuracy of this article is quite pleasing.
0
0
0
0
0
0
092245f83c74739b
Yeah, the only problem is that there aren't that many people involved in the discussion and you-know-who has stayed silent for the last few days thus ensuring there is no discussion to speak of. I know where to ask, I'm just unsure how to demonstrate that we're ready.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0923677a1600b2ef
Commonwealth Of Australia Before you start making false accusations against people you would be best also to check your facts. My research is not ORIGINAL RESEARCH it is the very essence of the true meaning of the Commonwealth of Australia and provided references to sources within Wikipedia and external locations. So before you start making accusations (false) CHECK YOUR FACTS !!! - End of discussion 122.151.69.75
0
0
0
0
0
0
0923bc146438e01f
I bother to note the other issue because wikipedia is explicitly a collaborative editing system, and making changes that (as I said) obscure the substance of your edits with lots of non-substantive changes makes the former goal harder. There are even explicit guidelines against needless/constant changing of irrelevancies such as this.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0923e2aef842629b
Nandesuka, you asked for it, you can certify it: Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/User_conduct#Use_of_administrator_privileges
0
0
0
0
0
0
0924233d160390bf
" On the way forward: consider this before posting here I would much prefer it if certain people did not post on this page. So, before posting please consider whether you might be described as a tendentious canvasser or drama seeker, mischief-maker, advocate, misrepresenter, someone who piles on without clue, or someone carrying over ""by association"" the disputes that they have with contributors elsewhere. If you might fall into one or more of those categories and still think it necessary to pass comment here then please try to find an admin to do that for you (and if you are an admin - Chillum comes to mind - then find another). I'm not keen on this because it restricts collaboration but, hey, people like that basically just seem to vent, poke or offer weird ""advice"" when I am the subject of their attention. I'm human, not a saint; while my ability to tolerate the types described above is not bad, it is also not infinite. I'd be pleased if the time that you would have spent here is expended instead on editing India-related articles. But bear in mind that you will need to be able to: deal knowledgeably with touchy and repetitively-raised issues such as Hindutva-, religious- and caste-related POV-pushing handle completely clueless newbies on a large scale, many of them encouraged to edit by an ill-considered WMF initiative handle often large-scale sock- and meat-farms, and masses of copyvio and BLP violations take copious amounts of general abuse pretty much daily face all sorts of physical and legal threats, both on- and off-wiki, as well as real-life stalking over prolonged periods by multiple people All with little or no support from the WMF and large swathes of the community who are more interested in the never-ending tendentious discussion of ""meta"" issues - among them policy, ""honor"", and the creation of a Wikitopia - than actually improving content where it matters most. And when you need a break from articles that relate to 20 per cent of the world's population and which suffer grossly from bias, systemic and otherwise, go chill by creating a GA or at least a B-class article more or less single-handed. Do all of this and you'll make me a very happy (and surprised) man. Do it for 130k-ish edits without getting blocked, on spurious grounds or otherwise, then you'll be really quite remarkable. I'm not saying that I will be back but if I do return, I'd rather not see stuff here from the types of people described above. Thanks. - "
0
0
0
0
0
0
092435919d232ff1
That could be an option, but I dont' see why that would be needed since they have stated an official motive of their organisation, which is equal righst for Sunnis, while stressing many times that they are not seperatist. Just because of some wiki editor not wanting that to be put into the article (for some reason) doesn't mean people should be deprived of sourced information.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0924fc30cdfaa60c
" Discussion at Administrators' Noticeboard/Incidents Hello there, as you have not yet replied to my post just above, and your recent contributions contain (apart from the legal threats) some material which I think is unsuitable for a user page, I have opened a discussion here about your contributions. Please feel free to post there if you wish. (Talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
092541ac794816e3
I added a link to the full original text and substituted the link to the modern Bulgarian version with a better one (pointing to a fuller version of the text). However, full text in modern Bulgarian is still misssing. 193.190.253.147
0
0
0
0
0
0
09261126c722aad0
The holocaust refers specifically to Jewish people killed for being such in concentration camps by Hitler and his Nazis, so of course this article is about that. Hitler was also responsible for the deaths of many other people but these deaths are not considered part of the holocaust, so there is no argument here. Thanks,
0
0
0
0
0
0
09262c70fc616b33
" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Alicia Hall, you will be blocked from editing.  superβεεcat  "
0
0
0
0
0
0
092676b83a5b7323
I was warned less than a minute after my last edit to the subject's page. I will no longer edit his talk page, refer to him, nor edit what he was edited—at least for, say, 3 months, after that the chances of incidental crossing paths is possible. If this page is blocked for me, not only will I use other IP addresses I occasionally use and the like, but evade the current block—of which I'm not, at present, intending to do—with such. I'm sure you are acquainted with Wikipedia:What adminship is not Good morning.24.36.54.238
0
0
0
0
0
0
09270bc74d5f8c8e
Not just church I think there should be something about the whole village, not just the church.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0927c621f8cb92ff
I am not Jewish and even if I was I am sure you would never understand why there is nothing wrong with it. First gays, now Jews, do you think you are still in your godforsaken regime? This is a civilized world with civilized people where Jews, gays or gay supporters are not blatantly singled out. Some tribes influenced the way I look? no, no, no, the only way they could influence it is through conquest, rape, forced deportation - that's how you got in Iran, dont think you moved there with your own will
1
0
0
0
0
0
0928471b2d81dbb9
List of Royal College Colombo alumni and Lalith Kothalawala and Cossde why this person Cossde doesn't want to / trying to avoid / or shy to add the name of old royalist the no one cheater in sri lanks to the list of List of Royal College Colombo alumni. this Cossde is a sick paranoid puppy who wants only the colombo 7 royalist to be survived on internet. u are an absolute sick ass hole( ).
1
0
1
0
1
0
0928721f6817165e
" requesting your thought Talk:Karen Gillan ""Lady Godiva incident"" I would like for you to weigh in on whether or not it should be added. Thanks "
0
0
0
0
0
0
092a1a492abc9095
Do you support confessions produced by torture then, since that is the implication of leaving the wording the way it is.
0
0
0
0
0
0