id
stringlengths 16
16
| comment_text
stringlengths 6
5k
| toxic
int64 0
1
| severe_toxic
int64 0
1
| obscene
int64 0
1
| threat
int64 0
1
| insult
int64 0
1
| identity_hate
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0ab15f0922295933 | "
Marmot, you're so cool! keep up the good work.
- ""a/s/l?""" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ab1a452696b5f37 | "
Continuing the list on needed clean-ups, the following statement is unaccurate:
C# supports a strict boolean type, bool. Statements that take conditions, such as while and if, require an expression of a boolean type. While C and C++ also have a boolean type (...)
C does not have a native boolean type (although a type ""bool"" or ""boolean"" is defined by many libraries), and conditions for if/for/while statements must be of ""arithmetic or pointer type"", according to K&R; second edition. I had edited this myself, rephrasing the statement, but edited back since I felt someone might do it better.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ab23d367fe2d2d4 | Squeeb
I'm concerned that you're going to end up spending a lot of time editing an article that will be deleted. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ab2d557e77cfbf0 | On September 1, Hitler attacked Poland. Britain and France were caught in their own trap. These two countries assisted in all of Hitler's adventures, hoping to use him against the Soviet Union.
http://www.plp.org/books/Stalin/node131.html | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ab3c30c6c0c3614 | I have responded now stop wasting my time I have just contacted two MEPs trying to keep my fiancee alive idiots like yhou will destroy any reputation wiki has. If you collude with murder what good are you 24 hours then do what you want I will refrain from posting anyting on your pages now stop bothering me I am busy for a while. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ab4271f5296203d | or the title of the book | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ab65b1eb454ba74 | Luckily, Norden1990 is not banned, but only blocked. (talk) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ab669a21bd76681 | Why is there more information on the Transformers universe than there is on Isaac Newton? This is a very interesting encyclopedia.
-VOMGivesUp | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ab6d9ce8ee20cbf | But he's a bitch who made a comment only a bitch would make? ) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
0ab727e180b3fd80 | "
Maybe, but I don't think any of that is relevant for WP purposes.¡digame! " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ab9775c0b8c70ed | "
That's the root of the entire discussion, and once again, Gwen, you are mistaken. If you're an Arab, or pro-Arab, you would indeed use ""Palestine"", if you're an Israeli or pro-Israeli, you would use ""Eretẓ Yisra'el"" (the land of Israel). Both are anachronisms, while ""Eretz Yisra'el"" pre-dates ""Palestine"". True, it was used for years by Western authors, but is it accurate? no. should it be accepted, when it's obviously a historical mistake? no. If you insist on using anachronisms, it would at least we more fair to write ""the Land of Israel/Palestine"". ( )" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0aba64bb2b53f837 | lol
i do what i can. i figured it'd be mean if i vandalized anything other than your vandalism box. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0aba856d3cf7f222 | The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker FAR
Hi! The Legend of Zelda FAR is still ongoing and has been moved to FARC. If you have the time, it would be appreciated if you could revisit your comments there, and perhaps give us your opinion as to whether the article should be kept as a FA or delisted. Thanks! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0abaca6f55e7b6ae | "
Germany - four entries
You did not respond to my argument at all - please read it more carefully:
The IOC cannot be seen as the single authoritative source on this article, as the IOC itself does not publish all-time tables, and publishes only unofficial tables per single Games. Therefore this article is in violation with WP:No original research! The official source for the German National Olympic Committee (DOSB) does list the Olympic Medals for Germany from 1896 to 2012 → .
There were no official country codes before 1976: Only in 1976 did the IOC start to assign standardized codes. Before that time, the local Organizing Committees of each Olympic Games had chosen codes, often in the local language, resulting in a multitude of codes.
At the Games of 1956, 1960, and 1964 the German team was simply known as ""Germany"" and the usual country code of (GER) was used. Yet, the IOC code EUA is currently applied in hindsight in the IOC medal database, without further explanation given.
Yugoslavia does not exist anymore as a country - the FRG does. The (FRG) Federal Republic of Germany did not cease to exist. It was a simple code change, same country, same NOC. NO alternate NOCs: EUA, FRG and GER have always had the same German National Olympic Committee (NOC) recognized in 1895, same NOC President (Willi Daume, 1960–1993), same Olympic Committee located in Frankfurt - only the codes have changed. Germany is officially still called (FRG), the Federal Republic of Germany - it's the same country, with the same NOC since the first modern Games held in 1896 - only the GDR had a separate NOC, because it was a separate country (although not recognized by Germany). ""West Germany"" did never exist, and is nothing more than the common English name used for the Federal Republic of Germany or FRG. The ""enlarged"" Federal Republic of Germany (known simply as ""Germany"") is thus the continuation of the pre-1990 Federal Republic of Germany - the very same country, with the same National Olympic Committee since 1895.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0abd91c177d0fbc8 | Also ur only blocking me from editing wikipeida, which I havent vandalised for a couple years and I wasnt going to anyway. Thats pretty pointless. The only thing I can't do is change my userpage. Well if I was gonna attack him i can just type it here. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0abe7ad2b46afad4 | "
Aaron Johnston?
Was the Aaron Johnston who was on this show the same Aaron Johnston who is the son of Lynn Johnston of ""For Better or For Worse"" fame?
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0abf51f0e62c5c98 | If you could look in....
I am considering going live with | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ac0d44d4fe7b711 | You can't ban anyone so please avoid talking about bans, since there isn't any consensus. You are just trying to impose your will regardless of the facts other people are providing to back their statements, without backing YOUR statements yourself. This map made by Renato Biasutti is more than enough. It clearly shows that, for instance, in Veneto % of blond people is from three to seven times higher than in Calabria, and in Tuscany is at least three times higher than in Sardinia. This is definitely relevant. Now of course you will say this map is:
1) old (but you won't provide a newer one)
2) not credible (but you won't provide a more credible map)
3) same difference as other countries (but you won't provide a single source proving that)
Etc.
Try to stick at this map. What is wrong about it? As long as people won't provide sources to back their statements I will consistently restore any reference in the article. 89.97.35.70 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ac0da258504d665 | My guess is the webmaster just used a generic commercial template. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ac15802d98ba0b5 | "
It really did read like an attack piece on Yobol and certainly was not written in the tone or style of a statement from a supposed research/philanthropic foundation. But the bottom line is that this article likely affects their bottom line and charity, after all, is a business these days. Perhaps we should consider protecting the page with pending changes? These new primary studies are likely to attract users with an agenda, and if the established research is correct that Morgellons is a delusional condition we have to keep in mind that we are literally dealing with people suffering a massive delusion. talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ac1a42da67e7ccb | You have a very good point. Sadly I have been banned forever from Wikipedia for arguing just this kind of thing. Perhaps you could try to continue the good work? This is important stuff, you will just have to deal with a lot of POV warriors. Good luck. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ac20ba119f607b2 | This article is poorly written in comparison to the general standard of legal articles on wikipedia. It needs to be re-written by either a lawyer or a good social science academic. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ac3048e0d1bacc2 | The double
The section on the rivalry v Cardiff mentions neither team has done the double and refered to an article discussing winning the league title and FA Cup. I am sure from context that is not what is mean't by the double here, and rather it means 1 team beating the other twice in 1 season. Is that correct?. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ac376ee0a7d9425 | The article is semi-protected. You can't edit it if your account is less than a few days (three, I think) old. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ac38ca13b3cafd2 | Alright go take a look at the Ampeg page, and explain how it is any different to the Markbass page. Go on? Do it. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ac393bcc98fff4a | Do you pride yourself in your ability to write such poetic and profound statements that mean nothing? Maybe you should take up poetry - you can show off your English skills to the world. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ac3e2061f3072de | My intent is to endorse his reply regardless of what he says. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ac4d556459204cb | "
the argument is that deism (in GW's case) was an informal subdivision of Episcopalian terology, not an organized religion one could ""belong"" to. He claimed membership in and was active in his Ang/Epis church but never said a word about being a deist, never joined a deist group & and never attended any deist ceremonies. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ac4eba697f2418d | "
The EU A 'German Ploy'?
This might be worth mentioning in this article: many people in Eastern Europe (and elsewhere [i.e. France, Russia, those Europeans countries that refuse to join, many others]) believe that the European Union is nothing more than a 'German ploy' to 'control' Europe both politically and economically (given that Germany is the most economically powerful and populous member of the EU). They say that the success of the EU obliquely fulfills the Third Reich's burning desire for Germany to become ""The Undisputed Masters of Europe."" Should this hypothesis be included in the article or simply written off as a deluded conspiracy theory? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ac50860dbb78896 | Don't post any garbage on my page! | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ac5906b808ab22a | Do it Our Way (Play)
Bruv... fuck off, I bought the flat, back in January and I've only edited on here as I see fit, so I dunno how I've abused multiple accounts and I don't think you're an idiot, I know you are a 24 carat idiot, look at the edit history on Do it Our Way it originally said it was R&B;/pop so if you don't believe me, you got eyes use 'em and I'll expect an apology! 86.182.64.127 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ac5acb69ea0a699 | You haven't looked into in the blatant POV and editing history of Malik Shabazz? Is it that you are not interested, agree with his POV pushing, or do you just fear him? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ac7d6e47025f0d0 | "
Derivation of IMP
There's been some activity to change the derivation of IMP in the article. The derivation ""Incarnate Memories Prevail,"" while unpersuasive, is at least cited, while the other derivation has no verifiable source. Cited clarifications are welcome. - " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ac7f3384c75e0b6 | REDIRECT Talk:Sun Hwa (Filipino School) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ac8f429a624d7ba | "
Check this one out;) 23:57, September 7, 2005 (UTC)" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ac990cfcafc71f5 | the truth is at http://www.bomis.com = where wiki used to be.
smile
beckjord | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0acb7bc61489b75a | Research into health effects
I don't believe this section is currently justifiable. The 1st study looks at a proxy variable in just 6 practitioners and the 2nd is from a self-selected sample and is self-published. Health benefits would be no surprise but these 2 studies do not add up to much. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0acc70c5afa0e8ce | Niggers and their liberal friends steal everything not tied down, just like the presidency here with acorn with its liberal defenders, FUCK YOU NIGGER OBOAMA! | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
0acc8f019826fac1 | List of FNL awards and noms
Hi Joey! Thanks for closing the merger proposal discussion ) Looking back at my answer to Jmajeremy just made me laugh. It only dates back from last year, but at the time I did not know much about Wikipedia so I just replied expressing my feelings without good arguments (I wrote in capital letters, wich I know now is inappropriate and used WP:OTHERSTUFF) lol. I was so mad at Jmajeremy because I had spent hours to find sources etc. Anyway, I'm so glad the discussion is closed even if my arguments were not solid ;) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ace722e25b63bb7 | "
Siddharth Mishra
Siddharth Mishra is a real and a living person. Kindly undelete that page. Though I have no ""online"" article to support his existence but I have newspaper cuttings to support this.
My question toyou- do you know him personally? If no then you should not delete this page." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0aceaa7c4a63ec46 | Support per COMMONNAME. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ad00799ffb3b2f6 | "
Obviously there is some anti-Americanism in Canada. This means nothing, necessarily, with regards to the structure of this article. I was referring to the specific idea that Canadian students fear their sovereignty will be overwhelmed, or that Canadians consider themselves cultural correctives to Americans. And I asked for another side of the story, and questioned how big of a deal this was to put in the introduction. Your response here is confusing. As far as ""citing my sources"", I am questioning your views and whether they belong in the article, not making additions to the article. Several of your quotes are very weak examples... many countries could claim anti-Americanism on the basis of involvement in the Middle-East... that doesn't mean it's a relevant enough addition to put into the INTRODUCTION of an article on one of the most trafficked websites in the world, that is meant to specifically talk about the MAJOR issues between two specific countries.
As far as your sources go, you did not comment on the obscurity of them. You have still not properly defended James Tagg (yes, that was me who removed that a year ago). I don't see why you get to just dub a source ""reliable"", when I thoroughly explained why I determined it ""unreliable"" (or, rather, inappropriate to add). I read that source, left you detailed comments, and you said something like ""Don't POV push"" and reverted my edits. You are not making an argument here. (re: Culture Clash in Archive 2)
Again, there are two sides to every story. Please try to tell both if you are going to edit this article. Many Canadians would laugh at the idea that the USA causes a ""profound fear"" that their sovereignty will be overwhelmed (and why do students' opinions have so much weight, by the way?). But there likely won't be many sources to support this, because the initial premise that it even might be the case is so rare that such sources wouldn't exist for a counter argument. Nevertheless, I'll take a look...
One last time... this is about obscurity clouding neutrality, and onesideness breaching neutrality. I am not trying to say that what you're saying is not true at all. I'm sure it is true the the extent that it is. But how much is that? The points in question fall so far below the relevance required to be in the introduction to an article, that they should be immediately moved." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ad02a6a47d8ca50 | "
I wonder what would be your NPOV version of the following article: Muslims believe that Muhammad was the last Prophet and Messenger of the monotheistic Abrahamic tradition, and that the Quran is the last revelation of God. Muslims also believe that after Quran and Muhammad, there will be no guidance from God. In the Quran, Muhammad is referred to as the ""Seal of the Prophets"" or the ""last Prophet"".
Followers of Mani (founder of the Persian faith Manichaeism) believe that these titles (the Seal of the Prophets and the Last Prophet) are attributed to Mani who, his followers claim, came before Muhammad.
I've bolded the statements that makes it NPOV. Now tell me how it compromises NPOV. If you are so much concerned with NPOV then why are you reverting to usedbook's version? I have asked him to cite sources of his claim and he didn't do so. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ad1462232012806 | "
By the way, what do you consider harassment? I object against three of his actions, not more.. talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ad218e29ad653e3 | an accusation that is | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ad29d8f33cfd27a | First, I just realized via your question that I could answer here. (Assuming it saves.)
Yes, I finally get that my attacks were totally inappropriate and unneccessary? I confess I did not at first, even this morning.
I realize I made inappropriate attacks after looking at his contributions and assuming some highly speculative personal motivation and then asking him about it in an offensive way. I would not be at all surprised if others have made negative assumptions about me based on looking at my contributions history and attacked me, so the user does have my sincere sympathies and apologies.
What to do differently when groups go after me? Write a better Wikiquette name several people? Go to WP:ANI naming several people? Do User:RfCs naming several people? That is where I admit I need further advice.
Since a 7.5 year old off wiki email is often the focus of harassment, and so far the advice is not to go into detail about it, I don't know how to defend the recurrent references to it. Let me say again, it was a stupid, overly generalized and exaggerated response, but certainly not written with some evil bigoted intent. I feel that a lengthy correction of it complete with refs about then existing specific incidents/issues/etc, or stating in detail my current views, would be inappropriate, even on my user page and doubtless lead to more accusations by people who have a different POV. But if there's some policy on this that I missed, I sure wish people would help me out with that. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ad3189aea77f282 | No problem! I'll find something else to use ) Cheers! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ad493e040168309 | "
The problem with leaving the other pages active is we'll have eight pages to maintain: four policies/guidelines and their talk pages. That would be unsustainable. The reason the merge took place was because inconsistencies inevitably creep in with lots of editors each with their own ideas. To maintain them all as active would be the worst possible outcome. (talk) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ad5b39add795880 | do not delete my comment you zionist
you are not allowed to delete my comment, so please do not do that! once it is up it is up! i have been warned, so there is no need for deleting it. if you are, then get rid of the warning! i have read the rules. also stoppin trying to spread your propaganda your zionist freak. you might aswell, name this page 'how to make a terrorist state into a briliant state. your propagnadist! get a life86.139.179.254 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ad65ac67eff0146 | "
Barbarians
The Chinese as a country are nothing but disgusting barbarians. I highly recommend every and all Chinese people to flee the horrors of the CCP before they come for YOU next! Its now official, over 20,000 Falun Gong have been murdered in this genocide but the official numbers are not certain due to the ""iron curtain"" around China. We haven't seen such destruction and genocide since the Soviet Union! Those damn Chinese. I feel bad for the Falun Gong. I hope every CCP dies of a horrible skin disease." | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ad6726f8f27f06b | re: Collective Punishment
Please see my response http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_punishment. Thank you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ad770a491a222a1 | "
""Head (geography) or headland, a type of peninsula"".
This isn't right. A headland is not a peninsula at all. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ad7ee189eb2ca64 | "
First off, you should not edit the list templates directly, as the bot will ignore any changes. Also, you cannot use vertical pipes anywhere in the syntax other than in separating the template name, the section name, and the reason, otherwise everything messes up. In place, use .
(From the yellow box at the top of my talk page - ""If I've left you a message on your talk page, I will watch it for your response, so please reply there."")
I am aware that the Bot usually overwrites manual edits - as I said, I spent hours trying to figure out why following the instructions listed on the RFC page weren't producing the results they should have. But when I saw that you had manually edited the list templates, I thought perhaps you had disabled the Bot until it was working properly.
Basically you're telling me the syntax that is commonly used throughout Wikipedia, vertical piping, is not valid within the RFC templates? That's messed up. What's even more messed up is the total lack of user instructions that mention that restriction. This has become a nightmare of a process. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ad84f2e63a09e59 | Edited by Daniel Danger Molineux ([email protected]) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ad8e1b7f08ea571 | I was unaware of that edit. I have the use of a public proxy and share with many other users. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ad9a44cebb7a771 | "
Minor wording issue about steamboats
I'm doing some bits of minor copyediting and am stuck on this sentence, from the Navigation section: The use of steamboats along the river, beginning in 1850... There is a footnote, to this timeline page, which phrases it ""1850: Steamboats Columbia and Lot Whitcomb begin regular service on the Columbia River."" The thing is there were steamboats in regular service on the river before 1850, at least to Fort Vancouver. The first was the Beaver (steamship), which arrived at Ft Vancouver in 1836. I thought about rewording the sentence The regular use of steamboats along the river..., but that isn't quite right either because the Beaver was in ""regular use"", even if its operations were not limited to the river. Anyway, I can't come up with a way to reword this bit, especially given the existence of the footnote, which does not mention the Beaver. So I'm just mentioning it here. It is a minor point to be sure, but symptomatic of an unfortunate US bias present in many history books and web pages. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ad9a536156bff82 | "
The Band's legacy, Beggar's Banquet, etc.
An anonymous user is repeatedly misreading The Guardian source and insisting on adding a dubious tag to it. Here's the direct quote:
The spark for Fairport taking this watershed turn was the Band's 1968 album Music from Big Pink, the record that - along with Bob Dylan and the Band's Basement Tapes bootleg - brought about a widespread musical volte-face, in which what remained of psychedelia was replaced by a new rootsiness. Among the rock aristocracy, its influence was evident in the Beatles' ill-fated back-to-basics project Let It Be, the Rolling Stones' purple patch that began with Beggars Banquet, and Eric Clapton's decision to call time on Cream.
The anonymous user takes issue with this statement, claiming that Music from Big Pink could not have influenced Beggar's Banquet because of chronology, i.e., that the Stones were almost done recording the album when Big Pink came out. But, read the statement: it does not say that it influenced the recording of Banquet, but the ""purple patch that began with...,"" etc. This seems clear to me. I would like to hear some other editor's opinions on this matter. -''''''TheFortyFive " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ada2d071dcd16b6 | Samuel is a chump with no life
i hope that is the case you chump. if i find out the reason u have so much time to work on this page is because you are getting paid to do it, my respect for you will fall even lower. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
0adb17bbf1430e1d | Well put. QG very rarely works towards consensus or compromise, and goes well beyond attempting to portray his idea of mainstream POV, he tries to bury articles in twisted versions of cherry picked sources with no respect to weight to make them look ridiculous. The fact that you think the subjects themselves are ridiculous is not justification for over-the-top tendentious editing. I truly am convinced by his editing habits that he and PPdd are one in the same person. An editor that active, with such an ownership complex might have multiple usernames. Those of you asking for diff's to justify the block, seriously just look at any talk page discussion he partakes in. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0adc149289b90076 | It was a mistake for all 15 cabinet positions, and all 7 cabinet-level positions, from the time they were nominated, until their confirmation by the Senate? Please. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0adc22892f6df4c2 | Migit wrestler
Why does it have to say that? Why cant it say dwarf or little person? Calling a dwarf a migit is a) rude and b) WRONG (PEOPLE ARENT SUPPOSE TO SAY IT) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0adc24a975814f3a | Sure, I'd be flattered if you used it! I don't know if you found this page, but this is the Wikimedia category for triple deckers in Massachusetts - Triple-decker houses in Massachusetts. There are several of us photographers who've been very busy in Massachusetts. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0adcb484ccc29f2c | I agree. Added merge tag. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0adcbf0f65116413 | Is this some kind of joke?
I'm baffled and not too far from voting for deletion. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0adcd39c5e8ba532 | Thevar is a backward caste
Thevar is a backward caste. They are tribals with out culture. Please dont promote your caste. Thevars are ideally SC/ST and are not allowed in temple. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0add82918fa6bc1a | "Flagged the page for reading like an advertisement for Jonathan Morris. Statements like ""Morris' work with Fox News has proven to be popular with viewers, with many voicing to the network – and to Morris – an interest in seeing more of him"" or ""Many in the news media turned to the young vice-rector for insight and perspective on the Pope and his impact on the church."" are vague and add nothing to the page. The general tone of the entire article is very pro-Jonathan Morris, with word choice and article structure seemingly designed as a promotion rather than an encyclopedic entry. Also,why is there a quotes section? ""People are starving for the love of Christ. The world needs priests. The world needs good moms and dads. The world needs good Christians."" tells me nothing about Jonathan Morris.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0add8cc12667893d | "
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Martin Crewes. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. — Toronto " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0addd66267e29d62 | I have no desire to edit anything, those who put up nonsense should be the ones removing it. The reality is as it stands, irreligion is associated ONLY with Christianity. This is a SERIOUS POV issue and those who put the portal link need to address this question. It does NOT logically follow that one group of Christians' views should lead to this portal link being placed in the talk page to the exclusion of all other religions. It is frankly speaking an attempt to frame the article in a manner that targets one religion, and that is not acceptable at all. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ade050510ded307 | Are you the stupid changes the Cubans flag, and put Puertorrican that created it all and they do not created nothing, your breasts the verga to us Venezuelans Peruvian and Cubans, abnormal mongoloid. While there are educated people like Tito Puente, Bobby Sanabria no one will believe your lies, nobody believes anything, swallow my verga. gross.64.254.111.109 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
0ade5de70a862e5a | Thanks for the tip-off on my talkpage. I'd prefer old disputes were left in the past, which is where they belong, rather than permanent records being kept of the merest thing. It's disappointing that many of the (presumably younger) Wikipedians on VfD feel differently. Anyway, as I said, thanks for the tip-off.
I see you have changed back my changes to the MoS. I have left three queries for you on the talk page. I'd be grateful if you would look at them and answer them. I would then suggest we do not re-address the issue for a while, and let other Wikipedians add their commments. Kind regards, 16:02, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0adea991cd68b262 | Userification of Cooked TV
Hello Darkside05, I have userified the article on Cooked TV as requested. Please see (speak to me) . | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0adf47cdcc024886 | Hey shithead
Hey shithead
Where are you?
Are you too busy sucking on someone's cock to talk right now?
119.245.89.79 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
0adf5702c35330ef | "
I've fixed the De La Salle link - it showed up as a notification for me because the dab page is one I created. But looking at the article raises the much bigger point: a navbox like that should not be part of the text of one article, but should be a template, added to the various appropriate articles. I see you created the navbox, so please sort this out. See WP:NAVBOX. Thanks. D " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0adf71b800cd5033 | "
So Jezz gets to personally attack, assume bad faith, and violate WP policy by removing chunks of material from my own comment in an article Talk page. Gotcha. I do not accept your decision as valid, fair, or equitably applied. I only wrote on Jezz's talk page because he was violating WP policy and insulting me and undoing my comments on the article talk page, and ignoring and disrespecting all the work and good-faith presentations I made on the article talk page. You agree iwth him removing chunks of my comment on the article talk page, though WP does not allow that? You're facilitating bad behavior on HIS part...by totally ignoring it, or not seeing it, and singling me out in this matter. Very wrong. Did you even read what I wrote on your talk page? I'm not saying I was necessarily totally perfect in the edit situation time-line or in my tone on the talk page. My point, sir, is Jezz has been farrr from perfect himself, and has definitely violated WP policy, yet you won't even see it, or get on him for it, or block him for doing all this. You notice I did not ""personally attack"" Doug Weller or Tgeorgescu. Why? Because they were civil and cool. (And you never gave me a full chance to even defend myself on the notice board page. So I don't agree at all with your action.) Jezz has been unquestionably out of line and you don't see any of his stuff on the ARTICLE talk page, or the nonsense and bad-faith insults and accusations and negativity he hurled at me left and right. Why is that? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ae01cf35570aec1 | YOUR WARNING WAS JUST A LITTLE LATE. I'VE ALREADY BEEN BLOCKED INDEF! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ae0aebe32a11aa6 | "==Comment==
This article is a very poor advertisement for the technological competence of the students of the department: please learn how to edit Wikipedia articles before trying to create an article. Notice that the way to create a bulleted list is to use ""*"", not indented spaces: this article looks very untidy. Notice that Wikipedia needs independent sources to verify the notability of the department. Look at other articles in the encyclopedia and copy their style. D " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ae0fb8686b4c7f9 | "
Re: Flag Desecration Amendment
Greetings - although plenty of cases involve sanctions of students, I have not heard of an arrest for ""failure to salute the flag, refusal to pledge allegiance to the flag, [or] speaking contemptuously of the flag"" - can you provide evidence of such? Cheers! T " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ae298481706de8f | Done. I hope to everyone's satisfaction, I didn't try the irreversible history merge as the only author losing credit is me, and I think that's OK. Also notice that desiccator was on Wikipedia:List of encyclopedia topics (20), so we've patched a small but significant hole in the coverage along the way. 18:21, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ae332d026f99eee | You don't know what the hell youre talking about! Do you!? 98.94.163.97 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ae3479d6c7d8096 | not be allowed to play the Intercontinental Cup even if they beat the South Americans. The reason: the Intercontinental Cup was a European/South American title, NOT a world title. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ae3980b230cd64c | That trashy mikkalai started to revert my own work and put racial trashy messages on my own space. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ae4fc6a8d06f07f | "
So I hope you will oppose any version of FR that would not have prevented this case, as not being fit for purpose. In just the same way that a retraction will be due from Jimbo if he somehow comes up with a proposal that would not have ""100% prevented"" the Ted Kennedy incident.
I hope that you might also realise that if in your words the case here is ""thankfully relatively rare"", why many people would then think that applying a blanket measure such as Flagged Revisions is not very appropriate at all. I contrast it as the British Government contending every citizen must be forced to carry an identity card, on the presumption that is the best way you can catch terrorists, which happen to also be ""thankfully relatively rare"". Why not for example in this specific case take a more intelligent approach, and implement sopmething that prevents or flags any edit that adds the word ""molesting"", instead of forcing onto all BLP articles an incredibly blunt and incredibly bad faith assuming measure? (and any interested observers, please, stop before you say it, these valid concerns with what FR is/could be cannot all just be washed away by referring to the quite irrelevant 'advantage' of FR of opening up the tiny minority of protected articles).
And to further address the specific example you give, maybe you can expand on why anybody would be likely to believe that one sentence claim, when it was added to the article along with another 15 sentences, which at best hint at the whole thing being a hoax, and at worst, screams delete me now for being total WP:BOLLOCKS. We can also discuss how an editor in between the vandalism and your removal 'fixes the article for typos' without noticing that it is 90% complete bollocks? Even when one of the typos is a few words away from the molesting red flag. A systemic failure perhaps?
And finally, as an admin, perhaps you can tell me why the IP user is not now blocked, irrespective of how long ago the edit occurred. Incidentally, the now famous bad account on Ted Kennedy was also not blocked immmediately after his first edit was a BLP violation on an unrelated article. Another systemic failure?
I'm all for criticla analysis of cases 'FR would have prevented', because they frequently pose more questions than they answer, about the whole model of Wikipedia, never mind how we efficiently and intelligently prevent BLP violations. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ae5341488bd44e1 | Where are the details for the boycott? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ae7be39d8c4e145 | "
Question for AGK
Hi AGK. You mention above that arbcom is anxious for Nina to submit her evidence so that others can rebut it. Nina didn't open this case, LHvU did. He alleges that
""...there is a sustained and possibly co-ordinated campaign to have the Wikipedia article reflect the POV of the ""anti-Stratfordians""; providing potential authorship candidates (and one in particular presently) an enhanced (preferably equal) standing within the article to that of Shakespeare."".
Why is the committee not anxious for LHvU to provide his evidence, so that whomever it is that he's accusing of engaging in this conspiracy can rebut his accusations? Bishonen has called for Nina to be banned for at least a year. Why is the committee not anxious for her to provide her evidence so that Nina can rebut it?
If I were you, Nina, I'd sit tight and wait to see what evidence, if any, is brought against you or anyone else. As things stand, there is no evidence, and no case to answer. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ae8d23dbb004a1b | "
Throwing ""qualifications"" for justification of a certin POV is meaningless. I can just as easily say that I work in finance, am Scottish, and don a kilt every Thursday to greet wee lasses along the Mile. Does that make me right?
Common sense people. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ae8f4a8fa8d3a7b | ":Category:Flagged articles ==
I have removed the [[:Category:Flagged articles]] from
the message above
. it was flagged at least two months ago by Some Other Editor,
but the current version looks OK to me. ennasis @
== " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ae903435d725610 | Thanks for the response. I understand how to use AWB, and I've seen many useful edits with it, as you describe. But I don't understand why line breaks after section headers, specifically, need to be undone. Is it something built into AWB that you are agreeing to because it prompts you, or is it something you added for a particular reason? The reason I'm curious is because I see people, such as myself, add a line after the section header in the edit window all the time and it seems inefficient if there is a guideline in the MOS or somewhere saying otherwise. Thanks, Tree | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ae90d07e1f982a7 | Just wanted to let you know that I think you're a faggot. Find better things to do with your time. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ae98611f092c85f | Yeah, I think that would be better as a quote unless you want to generalize his point. Google Books thought the wording was similar enough to match it to the corresponding paragraph in the book (which is how my script detects plagiarism in articles). | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0aeac460627eef8f | "
Replaceable fair use Image:UFC30 ortizTito 2.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:UFC30 ortizTito 2.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. .718 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0aeaf86ee8906711 | "
Kane's secrecy?
quote from the article:
""if the Allied campaign were to be completed in Red Alert, the Allies would emerge victorious and the time line would instead lead into the events of Red Alert 2. It should be noted however that this theory is in direct contradiction to the original Tiberian Dawn manual, which states that Nod is an African group in its origin, making no mention of the Soviet Union whatsoever.""
if the instruction manual was written by GDI, then perhaps they were simply deceived into what the origins of Nod were. Maybe Kane planted information stating that it was from Africa; or maybe it really WAS from Africa, and Kane's attempts to drum up support in the USSR were unsuccessful. Regardless, it doesn't seem to conflict, especially if it could be established that the manual was a GDI document, and therefore biased and uninformed.
96.229.63.68
Please go and look up the meaning of the word fiction sometime. Either by clicking on that hyperlink, or by visiting an online dictionary. The sooner the better, to be perfectly honest.
As an aside, the changes to the section you indirectly are proposing would translate to a classic example of original research. The section's current content is sourced through the referencing of several different publications and statements of various C&C; development teams, rendering it fully verified. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0aed4faa27c04940 | "
Re: The Shining
You have repeatedly changed an image file with no explanation, in addition to adding unreferenced and speculative information to the article. Please stop. Use an edit summary to fully explain your changes, and do not add unreferenced information or interpretation. Thank you. -''''''The'FortyFive' " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0aee1eff31760a6a | " May 2010 (UTC)
Interesting post to the sandbox...I don't mind as long as that's the only place you do it. You can also vandalize my sandbox if it becomes too much. However, do not change any of the content and please don't use any profanity! royal court 21:03, 13" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0aef402b96c64ead | ". Maybe it's just me, but surely children writing book-reports on themes can read the book for themselves?
Thank you for not giving away the ending of the novel like the entry for Tortilla Flat does. Common sense has prevailed! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.160.121.211 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0af06abc29306c4c | Links to time
The correct links for record / track times are to minute and second rather than minutes and seconds which have different meanings, which you do not intend. Thanks, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0af09a20f4ae4d9c | I swear, you're extremely stupid and oblivious. Open your eyes, unless you need to see an eye doctor that is. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
0af0c50077e23750 | Nope. This is absolutely congruent with the material immediately preceding, is relevant to how the campaigns treated the issue of JtP, is relevant to the later section on JtP having a new 501c3 starting up etc. The source is not only reliable, it is succinct and does not use excess verbiage at all. Would you prefer that the emails end up here or just the facts as published? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0af15a94566e6499 | "
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. (talk)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0af177e77102c7b4 | Thanks
Hi David,
Thanks for taking the time to write such a thoughtful analyis at Talk:DepoProvera. (And for reminding me it's Guy Fawkes!)
I feel that I don't need to assure you that I will not be offended in any way if you restate your position from our earlier discussion re Pfizer/LaCroix/BMD in the current disputebut just in case, please be assured that I will not. It might actually be helpful to have other people than Mastcell and I making the argumentsperhaps more input should be solicited elsewhere, as well, if not enough editors contribute in a week or two week's time.
I will be slow-to-respond/disengaged on the Depo talkpage, in hopes of keeping things cool, while still continuing to advance the discussion. There is no hurry and deadline, after all.:-)
I don't know if you've been following the discussion at Emergency Contraception, but MastCell's first post to Depo occurred less than 30 minutes after the conclusion of this exchange: . It seems unfair to accuse him of harassment or wikistalking, but it also seems to me that he arrived at Depo already quite upset/confrontational, etc. Because there is even the possibility that there is a causal relationshipi.e., he is angry re EC page and following me to Depo, (and Dalkon Shield) to express animosity, I think it is better that the Depo discusssions involve plenty of input from other editors.
Remember, remember -), | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0af1c9ec9957e564 | "
Why?
Why it is that I can't drink water before getting a general anesthetic? '''''' " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.