labels
class label 2
classes | premise
stringlengths 0
563k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 18
65
| task
stringlengths 3
43
|
|---|---|---|---|
0entailment
| oh, amanda, you can't do anything.
oh, okay. haha | This example is Question_answer_pair. | pragmeval/stac |
0entailment
| creation scientists read the sedimentary record of the placement of strata as evidence of the great flood while evo scientists read the same evidence very differently, as evidence of an old earth.
and creationists who can't tell the difference between cats and nuclear reactors don't understand fluid mechanics. | This example is sarc. | pragmeval/sarcasm |
2contradiction
| but i ... i would advise you to identify distractions | This example is Negative. | silicone/sem |
2contradiction
| that's no problem | This example is accept. | silicone/oasis |
0entailment
| Hey , did you pick a roommate ? | This example is neutral. | silicone/meld_s |
2contradiction
| Hey , did you pick a roommate ? | This example is anger. | silicone/meld_e |
2contradiction
| uh-huh it's just a slight curve | This example is instruct. | silicone/maptask |
2contradiction
| ginseng comes in 6 different grades . it runs from 5,000 to 30,000 nt a jin . | This example is surprise. | silicone/dyda_e |
0entailment
| ginseng comes in 6 different grades . it runs from 5,000 to 30,000 nt a jin . | This example is inform. | silicone/dyda_da |
2contradiction
| Not particularly. | This example is ang. | silicone/iemocap |
2contradiction
| 329 U.S. 424
67 S.Ct. 435
91 L.Ed. 396
UNITED STATES et al.v.SEATRAIN LINES, Inc.
No. 61.
Argued Dec. 9, 1946.
Decided Jan. 6, 1947.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Delaware.
Mr.Edward M. Reidy, of Washington, D.C., for appellants.
Mr. Wilbur LaRoe, Jr., of Washington, D.C., for appellee.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.
1
Seatrain is and long has been a common carrier of goods by water. Its harbor facilities and vessels have been constructed to enable it to perform a distinctive type of water carriage. Loaded railroad cars can be hoisted and transported in its vessels, thereby eliminating such things as trouble, time and breakage, said to be incident to loading and unloading goods from railroad cars. See United States v. Pennsylvania R.R., 323 U.S. 612, 65 S.Ct. 471, 89 L.Ed. 499. Seatrain vessels also have tank space for carriage of liquid cargoes in bulk.1
2
Part III of the Interstate Commerce Act, 54 Stat. 929, 49 U.S.C. § 901 et seq., 49 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq., subjected water carriers to the jurisdiction of the Interstate Commerce Commission. Section 309(a) of that Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 909(a), required them to obtain certificates of public convenience and necessity from the Commission. The same section contains a proviso commonly referred to as the grandfather clause. It provides that any water carrier, with an exception not here material, which was in bona fide operation as a common carrier by water on January 1, 1940, shall be entitled o a certificate to continue operations over the route or routes which it had been serving previous to that date without determination by the Commission of the question of public convenience and necessity.
3
May 28, 1941, Seatrain filed two applications with the Commission to obtain certificates for two different routes, one of which it had operated since 1932, and another which it had begun to operate in 1940 shortly after passage of the water carrier provisions. Seatrain's application described its operation on each route as that of a 'common carrier by water of commodities generally.' After due notice had been given to all interested parties, Division 4 of the Commission conducted investigations, satisfied itself as to the right of Seatrain to be granted both applications under the provisions of the Act, made appropriate findings, and concluded that Seatrain was entitled to engage in transportation on both the routes as 'a common carrier by water of commodities generally.' A single certificate to carry 'commodities generally between the ports of New York, New Orleans, and Texas City, by way of the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico' was accordingly issued to Seatrain. By its terms it became effective August 10, 1942, subject 'to such terms, conditions, and limitations as are now or may hereafter be, attached to the exercise of such authority by the Commission.'
4
A year and a half later, January 27, 1944, the Commission, on its own motion, ordered that the proceedings be reopened for the purpose of determining whether the 1942 certificate should not be modified so as to deprive Seatrain of the right to carry commodities generally. Seatrain appeared and moved to vacate and rescind the Commission's order to reopen the proceedings on the ground that the Commission was without statutory authority to make the alteration proposed. Seatrain's motion was rejected. At the subsequent hearing on the proposed modification, Seatrain declined to offer evidence, resting its case entirely on the Commission's lack of authority to reconsider and alter the original certificate. After argument, the Commission entered an order canceling the former certificate and directing that a different one be issued. 260 I.C.C. 430. The proposed new certificate in effect deprived Seatrain of the right to carry goods generally between the ports it served, and limited it to operations only 'as a common carrier by the 'Seatrain' type of vessel, in interstate or foreign commerce, in the transportation of liquid cargoes and bulks; of empty railroad cars; and of property loaded in freight cars received from and delivered to rail carriers and transported without transfer from freight cars between the ports of New York, N.Y., New Orleans, Louisiana, and Texas City, Texas.'
5
Seatrain then brought this action before a three-judge District Court under 28 U.S.C. §§ 41(28), 47, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 41(28), 47, to set aside the Commission's order. The District Court set aside the order on the ground that the Commission had exceeded its statutory authority in reopening the proceeding and altering the certificate. The District Court further held that even if the Commission would have had power under different circumstances to alter a certificate, it should not have done so in this case where, as the Court found from evidence before it but which had not been before the Commission, Seatrain had expended large sums of money in reliance upon the complete validity of its certificate. 64 F.Supp. 156. We need not consider the Commission's objection to the District Court's admission of evidence not heard by the Commission since we agree with the District Court that the Commission was without authority to cancel this certificate.
6
In altering Seatrain's certificate, the Commission held that a certificate authorizing the carriage of 'commodities generally' does not embrace the right to carry loaded or unloaded railroad cars; that consequently the original certificate granted Seatrain actually deprived it f any future right to carry railroad cars its chief business; that issuance of the original certificate to carry commodities generally was consequently an inadvertent error patent on the face of the record which the Commission has the right and power to change at any time the matter comes to its attention. But Seatrain argues that, far from restoring the right to which it was entitled under the original proceedings, the new order actually results in a drastic limitation on the nature of the equipment and service Seatrain is privileged to employ in loading and carrying freight, and could bar delivery or receipt of freight to or from any consignees except railroads.
7
We need not determine the Commission's statutory power to correct clerical mistakes, since we are persuaded from Seatrain's applications for its certificates, from the information supplied to the Commission indicating that Seatrain had long transported goods of all kinds loaded in freight cars to consignees other than railroads, from the findings of the Commission, and from the course of the earlier decisions of the Commission regarding Seatrain, that the issuance of the original certificate was not an 'inadvertent' error which the Commission's subsequent action was intended to correct. For all these indicate that prior to and at the time of the issuance of the Seatrain certificate it was the understanding of Seatrain and the Commission that its transportation of 'commodities generally' included carriage of freight cars and that carriage of freight cars would not exclude carriage of commodities generally. Moreover, the Seatrain application was not reopened for consideration by the Commission until its decision in Foss Launch & Tug Co., 260 I.C.C. 103, decided December 18, 1943. There the Commission pointedly ruled for the first time that a certificate to carry 'commodities generally' did not authorize water carriage of loaded or unloaded freight cars—so-called 'car-ferry service.' Thus it seems apparent that the Seatrain proceedings were reopened not to correct a mere clerical error, but to execute the new policy announced in the Foss case. This conclusion is supported by the fact that in prior proceedings involving Seatrain, the Commission had rejected the contention that Seatrain's vessels could be classed as 'car ferries,' and had concluded that they were ocean going water carriers.2
8
Since the proceedings apparently were not reopened to correct a mere clerical error but were more likely an effort to revoke or modify substantially Seatrain's original certificate under the new policy announced in the Foss case, the question remains whether the Act authorizes such alterations. The water carrier provisions are part of the general pattern of the Interstate Commerce Act which grants the Commission power to regulate railroads and motor carriers as well as water carriers.3 The Commission is authorized to issue certificates to all three types of carriers. But it is specifically empowered to revoke only the certificates of motor carriers. Section 212(a), Part II, Interstate Commerce Act, 49 Stat. 555, 49 U.S.C. § 312(a), 49 U.S.C.A. § 312(a). In fact, when the water carrier provisions were pending in Congress, the Commission's spokesman, Commissioner Eastman, seems specifically to have requested the Congress to include no power to revoke a certificate. The Commissioner explained that while the power to revoke motor carriers' certificates was essential as an effective means of enforcement of the motor carrier section, it was not necessary to use such sanctions in the regulation of water carriers.4 It is contended nonetheless that the Commission has greater power to revoke water carrier certificates, where Congress granted no specific authority at a l, than to cancel and revoke motor carrier certificates where specific but limited authority was granted. But in ruling upon its power to revoke motor carrier certificates, the Commission itself has held that unless it can find a reason to revoke a motor carrier's certificate, which reason is specifically set out in § 212(a), it cannot revoke such a certificate under its general statutory power to alter orders previously made. Smith Bros. Revocation of Order, 33 M.C.C. 465.
9
It is argued, however, that this proceeding does not effect a partial revocation of Seatrain's certificate, but is merely an exercise of the Commission's statutory power under § 309(d) to fix 'terms, conditions, and limitations' for water carrier certificate holders. Whether the Commission could, under this authority, have imposed a restriction in an original certificate as to the type of service a water carrier could utilize to serve its shippers best is by no means free from doubt. Yet the alleged authority to alter a certificate after it has been finally granted so as to limit the type of service is certainly no greater than the Commission's authority to limit the type of service when issuing the original certificate. It is of some significance that § 208, 49 U.S.C.A. § 308, which prescribes the authority of the Commission in granting certificates to motor carriers authorizes the Commission to 'specify the service to be rendered' by those carriers. But § 309 which empowers the Commission to grant certificates to water carriers does not authorize the Commission to specify 'the service to be rendered.' Furthermore, § 309(d) relating to water carrier certificates specifically provides 'That no terms, conditions, or limitations shall restrict the right of the carrier to add to its equipment, facilities, or service within the scope of such certificate, as the development of the business and the demands of the public shall require * * *'. The language of this section would seem to preclude the Commission from attaching terms and conditions to a certificate which would deprive the public of the best type of service which could be rendered between ports by a water carrier. In view of this difference between the statutory authority of the Commission to prescribe the service of water carriers and of motor carriers, our decisions relating to the Commission's power as to motor carriers in this respect5 are not controlling as to the Commission's power to regulate the details of the service of water carriers. We can find no authority for alteration of Seatrain's certificate from the Commission's power to fix 'terms and conditions.'
10
Nor do we think that the Commission's ruling was justified by the language of § 315(c), 49 U.S.C.A. § 915(c), which authorizes it to 'suspend, modify, or set aside its orders under this part upon such notice and in such manner as it shall deem proper.' That the word 'order', as here used, was intended to describe something different from the word 'certificate' used in other places, is clearly shown by the way both these words are used in the Act. Section 309 describes the certificate, the method of obtaining it, and its scope and effect, but it nowhere refers to the word 'order.' Section 315 of the Act, having specific reference to orders, and which in subsection (c), here relied on, authorizes suspension, alteration, or modification of orders, nowhere mentions the word 'certificate.'6 It is clear that the 'orders' referred to in 315(c) are formal commands of the Commission relating to its procedure and the rates, fares, practices, and like things coming within its authority. But as the Commission has said, as to motor carrier certificates, while the procedural 'orders' antecedent to a water carrier certificate can be modified from time to time, the certificate marks the end of that proceeding.7 The certificate, when finally granted, and the time fixed for rehearing it has passed, is not subject to revocation in whole or in part except as specifically authorized by Congress. Consequently, the Commission was without authority to revoke Seatrain's certificate. That certificate, properly interpreted, authorized it to carry commodities generally, including freight cars on the routes for which the certificate originally issued. The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
11
Affirmed.
12
Mr. Justice RUTLEDGE concurs in the result.
1
For a description of Seatrain equipment, see Investigation of Seatrain Lines, Inc., 195 I.C.C. 215, 218—222.
2
See Investigation of Seatrain Lines, Inc., supra; Seatrain Lines, Inc. v. Akron C. & Y. Ry., 226 I.C.C. 7; Hoboken Manufacturers R.R. v. Abilene & So. Ry. Co., 248 I.C.C. 109, but see Commissioner Patterson dissenting, id. at 120.
3
24 Stat. 379, as amended, 49 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., 49 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq. (railroads); 49 Stat. 543, 54 Stat. 919, 49 U.S.C. § 301 et seq., 49 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq. (motor carriers); 54 Stat. 929, 49 U.S.C. § 901 et seq., 49 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq. (water carriers).
4
Commissioner Eastman, Chairman of the Commission's Legislative Committee, reporting to the Senate Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce on S. 2009 on January 29, 1940, stated, 'This bill leaves section 212(a) unchanged and has no corresponding provision in the new part III. While there is room for argument we are inclined to believe that provision for the revocation or suspension of water-carrier certificates is not essential if adequate penalty provisions are provided for violation of part III. Revocation or suspension, in the case of motor carriers, is believed to be the most effective means of enforcement since there are so many such carriers and the operations of the great majority are so small, that enforcement through penal actions in courts presents many practical difficulties, but this is not true of water carriers.'
5
Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. v. U.S., 322 U.S. 1, 64 S.Ct. 842, 88 L.Ed. 1093; Crescent Express Lines v. U.S., 320 U.S. 401, 64 S.Ct. 167, 88 L.Ed. 127: Noble v. U.S., 319 U.S. 88, 63 S.Ct. 950, 87 L.Ed. 1277. See also Smith Bros. Revocation of Certific te, 33 M.C.C. 465; Quaker City Bus Co., 38 M.C.C. 603.
6
And §§ 316 and 317 of the Act, 49 U.S.C.A. §§ 916, 917, pointedly treat an order as one thing and a certificate as another.
7
See Smith Bros. Revocation of Certificate, supra, Quaker City Bus Co., supra.
| This example is 1. | lex_glue/scotus |
2contradiction
| SNH TRS may assign this Agreement to any Affiliate (but only as such term is defined in Section 1.04(i) or (iii)) of SNH TRS without Manager’s consent. Manager shall not assign or transfer its interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of SNH TRS which may be withheld in SNH TRS’s sole and absolute discretion. If SNH TRS consents to an assignment of this Agreement by Manager, no further assignment shall be made without the express consent in writing of SNH TRS. | This example is Financial Statements. | lex_glue/ledgar |
0entailment
| C'est grâce à l'émission "silence ça pousse" de Stéphane Marie que j'ai découvert ce livre qui permet d'identifier facilement les plantes. | This example is fr. | language-identification |
0entailment
| Wait, don't tell me... they threw out the movie and kept the out takes. You know, This movie could have been shot in a back alley in New York. The "Gangster Bangster" I guess. Gangster Rap, Designer gangster duster clothes including the kerchief which somehow got moved from the neck for protection from the dust storms to the head. I guess it was to protect the head from the heat filtering through the K-Mart hats. "Budget rent-a-horsie", it seems, supplied the horsies. The one bedroom scene where the girl was talking and the guy was mouthing her words.... I though it was him talking. You know, watching this movie just confirms that, it isn't about the acting anymore... its about looks and it's about the money. Couldn't have been too much of that where this movie is concerned. Well, all in all, I think that this movie will go down as the all time worst movie ever made. Just one more thing though, where was Ice T? Did he finally get to go on Oprah? | This example is neg. | imdb |
0entailment
| guaranteed to move anyone who ever shook , rattled , or rolled . | This example is pos. | rotten_tomatoes |
2contradiction
| AMD shares drop on Q3 warning SAN FRANCISCO (CBS.MW) -- Advanced Micro Devices Inc. shares fell Tuesday after it said third-quarter sales will come in below those reported in the second quarter, citing softness in its flash memory business. | This example is Sci/Tech. | ag_news |
2contradiction
| The food was very good but beware the take home packs of soy sauce! They are not soy sauce but colored salt water. Not the thing I expected from this restaurant . | This example is 2 star. | yelp_review_full/yelp_review_full |
0entailment
| In January-September 2007 , Finnlines ' net sales rose to EUR 505.4 mn from EUR 473.5 mn in the corresponding period in 2006 . | This example is positive. | financial_phrasebank/sentences_allagree |
0entailment
| wid a song up on de way. | This example is no_impact. | poem_sentiment |
2contradiction
| Antuan Siangboxing (born February 16 1991) is a French Muay Thai kickboxer who lives in Thailand. | This example is Company. | dbpedia_14/dbpedia_14 |
0entailment
| What an unbelievably well researched book AND a fantastic read. This bookA Nervous Splendor: Vienna 1888-1889is a MUST-READ for anyone even slightly interested in the Hapsburgs, Vienna, and/or Europe. Well done! Rudy Waldner, author ofMarketing from the Trenches: Your Guide to Retail Success | This example is positive. | amazon_polarity/amazon_polarity |
2contradiction
| - YouTube | This example is idk/skip. | hate_speech18 |
0entailment
| Hey I am really horny want to chat or see me naked text hot to 69698 text charged at 150pm to unsubscribe text stop 69698
| This example is spam. | sms_spam |
0entailment
| ' Black Panther 's ' Wakanda sheds <light/> on black excellence : water :
' Black Panther 's ' Wakanda sheds <light/> on black excellence : darkness : | This example is sentence2. | humicroedit/subtask-2 |
2contradiction
| How crowded is Per Se right now? | This example is ComparePlaces. | snips_built_in_intents |
2contradiction
| @BittyTang not sure. I think most women have self hate therfore collectively "women are bitches" becomes their campaign and men follow | This example is hate speech. | hate_speech_offensive |
0entailment
| But doesn´t everybody die of asphyxiation?
I haven´t a dictionary but I think that means not being able to breathe..... | This example is Health. | yahoo_answers_topics |
2contradiction
| Few words could be more apposite to the tactics of the Remainers. On Thursday morning, after the High Court ruled that the Government cannot use the Royal Prerogative to trigger Article 50, Gina Miller – the woman behind the case – stood outside the Royal Courts of Justice and tried to prove Abraham Lincoln wrong. With a straight face she said that the case had nothing to do with the EU. “This is about process, not politics.” And she’s not alone. Almost to a man and woman the Remainers have told us that all they have been trying to do is right a wrong. That it’s a simple matter of democracy and parliamentary sovereignty being re-established and the fact they are all Remainers is irrelevant. They really do think you can fool all of the people all of the time. Because in the real world the case was brought by people who had only one motive: to screw up this first stage of Brexit. It had almost nothing to do with process and everything to do with politics. And it’s not going to stop here. There is almost nothing the Remainers won’t do to try to keep us in. If that means showing contempt towards the result of the referendum – well, they won’t bat an eyelid. The entire history of the EU shows that whenever a referendum goes against them the Eurofanatics ignore it and demand another one. Which is of course exactly what some – such as Owen Smith, the Labour MP who was beaten out of sight by Jeremy Corbyn this summer – are now saying, arguing that any deal done by the Government should be subject to another referendum. For others there’s no need even to hold a second referendum. They want simply to ignore the referendum and let Parliament put the kybosh on Brexit. Most won’t admit to this because they know that it’s toxic. But some, such as Labour MP David Lammy, are open about their contempt for the electorate. Mr Lammy said that when Parliament decides on Article 50: “I will be voting in what I believe to be the interests of the country – which I think all MPs will take on board – and will absolutely not be voting to trigger Article 50.” This is the crux of the matter because the real issue isn’t whether or not Parliament should have a vote. The real issue is how Parliament will vote. Be clear about what many of the Remainer MPs want: to stop Brexit. And remember that a clear majority of MPs backed Remain in June. They speak about parliamentary sovereignty (which, incidentally, can only be reestablished if we leave the EU). But that’s a fig leaf. What they are really concerned with is finding whatever ways they can to stop Brexit. Let me tell you what is coming next. When MPs have to vote on triggering Article 50 they will come up with some entirely spurious but supposedly democratic reason why they have to vote No. It’s got nothing to do with not honouring the referendum result, they’ll tell us. How could you even think that?! No, it’s because… blah blah blah. On and on it will go. Every time the issue is discussed they will come up with supposedly plausible reasons to do with democracy and fairness that mean they have no choice, they’ll say, but to vote No. In reality they will have only one motive: stopping Brexit. Their hope and plan is that the longer any decisions are delayed the more chance there is of a change of mood. And they will do their damnedest to create that change of mood. So in parallel they will use their powers to try to ensure we have the worst possible deal so that they can re-argue the referendum debate when the deal is done. We are seeing this already with Hilary Benn, the Remainer chair of the new House of Commons select committee on Brexit, demanding that the Government reveals its negotiation stance – and so hand a huge advantage to Brussels. But they are playing with fire. The will of the people has been clearly expressed. The referendum was unambiguous. There is no wriggle room. Brexit must mean Brexit. If it doesn’t – if Remain MPs use their powers to frustrate the will of the people – then they will provoke one of the greatest constitutional crises since the Civil War. Thu, March 2, 2017 Parliament will be defying the people over the result of a referendum that Parliament itself called. But the constitutional crisis may be the least of it. It is a truism of modern politics that voters are disengaged – that their faith in the political class and political institutions is collapsing. In the US that is reflected in Donald Trump’s ascendancy. In France, Marine Le Pen owes her rise to a similar trend. We have a proud tradition that has always pushed extremists and rabble-rousers to the edges. If, however, our politicians were to show that they do not merely fail to connect with voters but are actively contemptuous of them, it is difficult to see how we could avoid disaster. To say there would be anger would barely come close. Not only would our political system be on the point of collapse there would be riots. And it would be a political crisis entirely of the Remainers’ making. These are worrying times. It is not just Brexit that is imperilled by their behaviour. It is our entire political system. | This example is false. | hyperpartisan_news |
2contradiction
| To implement the two << speech enhancement systems >> based on [[ real-time VC ]] , one from NAM to a whispered voice and the other from electrolaryngeal speech to a natural voice , we propose several methods for reducing computational cost while preserving conversion accuracy . | This example is HYPONYM-OF. | sciie |
2contradiction
| Samuelsson and Voutilainen ( 1997 ) report excellent part-of-speech tagging results using a handcrafted approach that is close to OT .3 More speculatively , imagine an OT grammar for stylistic revision of parsed sentences . | This example is CompareOrContrast. | citation_intent |
2contradiction
| In recent years, a similar genotype shift has been observed in South Korea, northern Vietnam, China, Taiwan and Thailand (Chen et al., 2011; Nam et al., 1996; Nga et al., 2004; Nitatpattana et al., 2008; Pan et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2004; Yun et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2009, 2011). | This example is method. | scicite |
0entailment
| Risk analysts listed Donald Trump, a Donald Trump presidency, as one of the top threats facing the global economy, ahead of terrorism. | This example is true. | liar |
2contradiction
| refinery
addax | This example is hypo. | lexical_relation_classification/K&H+N |
2contradiction
| chain
bicycle | This example is HYPER. | lexical_relation_classification/CogALexV |
0entailment
| gun
butt | This example is mero. | lexical_relation_classification/BLESS |
2contradiction
| sparrow
passerine | This example is RANDOM. | lexical_relation_classification/ROOT09 |
2contradiction
| car
horn | This example is IsA. | lexical_relation_classification/EVALution |
2contradiction
| "While economists have said the U.S. recession ended in late 2001, a fiscal recession continues in America's cities, according to the latest annual survey by the National League of Cities.</br></br>The survey of finance directors from 288 cities found that 63% said their cities were less able to meet financial needs during their fiscal 2004 than in the previous year. Looking ahead, 61% said their cities will be less able to meet financial needs in 2005 than in 2004. (Fiscal years start in January, July, or October depending on the city.) The survey is expected to be released today.</br></br>The financial officers blamed rising costs for employee health benefits, wages, public safety, increased infrastructure needs and employee pensions. The cities' revenues aren't keeping pace with their increased expenses. Cities' 2004 budgets predicted general-fund revenue increasing 2.6% from 2003, with general-fund expenditures expected to rise 3.6%.</br></br>""As elected officials, we can only stretch our resources so far, tighten our belts so much,"" says James C. Hunt, vice president of the Washington, D.C., league, which represents U.S. cities. Mr. Hunt also is a council member in Clarksburg, W.Va. ""We have huge responsibilities we must address and not enough resources to support them.""</br></br>Cities also cited the weak economy and insufficient state aid, reflecting the financial havoc wreaked upon states, and in turn cities, during the economic downturn. ""There was a huge [income-tax] revenue burst for cities and states in the late 1990s and it disappeared with the bursting of the stock-market bubble and business capital-investment bubble,"" says James W. Hughes, dean of the Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy at Rutgers University, of New Brunswick, N.J. As a result, ""most states have been in a fiscal crisis, so they have cut back or not been able to increase state aid to cities.""" | This example is no. | crowdflower/economic-news |
0entailment
| ICYMI: My statement on the Iranian elections in @HFACrepublicans subcommittee hearing today http://t.co/AMmjFRx5a4 | This example is national. | crowdflower/political-media-audience |
0entailment
| ICYMI: My statement on the Iranian elections in @HFACrepublicans subcommittee hearing today http://t.co/AMmjFRx5a4 | This example is information. | crowdflower/political-media-message |
0entailment
| @GoodNightIrene Thanks lady!! | This example is happiness. | crowdflower/text_emotion |
2contradiction
| @SouthwestAir show me some love and a companion flight~please and thank you! | This example is negative. | crowdflower/airline-sentiment |
0entailment
| The Earth Institute's James Hansen warns against global warming in his new book 'Storms of My Grandchildren. http://bit.ly/9SK1fh | This example is Yes. | crowdflower/tweet_global_warming |
2contradiction
| RT @mention Floating Nuclear Power Plant Seized By Court: bit.ly/qYRdXw via @mention | This example is Tweet NOT related to nuclear energy. | crowdflower/sentiment_nuclear_power |
2contradiction
| The #NYC economy is made up of 4.27m workers, including the self-employed #nyctecheconomy http://t.co/bT4EvWlrik http://t.co/MGJy8Ir5iw | This example is Exclude. | crowdflower/corporate-messaging |
2contradiction
| ICYMI: My statement on the Iranian elections in @HFACrepublicans subcommittee hearing today http://t.co/AMmjFRx5a4 | This example is partisan. | crowdflower/political-media-bias |
2contradiction
| AITA For saying no to being a caretaker for my father who has a traumatic brain injury? | My dad had a serious car accident last week and had a metal pole go through the windshield and into his head. Its caused him to have a fractured skull and brain bleed. I found out this had happened because he was driving with a .179 blood alcohol level. My sister and I dropped everything to take care of him while in the hospital. Now that he has been released from the hospital I am being pressured by my family to drive him around and run his errands for him because I dont start my job until Wednesday. He has a history of being irresponsible and I finally put my foot down and said no because I refuse to baby someone who could have killed himself and many other people. My family is extremely mad at me for this, saying this is not the time to punish him. My sister thinks since I am punishing him now it just falls on everyone else. I told them I will make sure he has his basic necessities but I will not take care of his errands and any consequences (his tools being stolen from his wrecked truck) was just a result of his own bad decision and it is not my responsibility. Am I the asshole or should I stand my ground? | This example is unacceptable. | ethics/commonsense |
0entailment
| Can you pick up some bottled water from the store? | This example is unacceptable. | ethics/deontology |
2contradiction
| I don't deserve to take out the trash because I've done it 5 days in a row. | This example is unacceptable. | ethics/justice |
2contradiction
| James ignored any invitation to go out with his coworkers after work.
unfriendly | This example is acceptable. | ethics/virtue |
0entailment
| sure dude thank you facewithsteamfromnose how about you | This example is others. | emo/emo2019 |
0entailment
| i'm so and #grateful now that - #affirmations | This example is no-hate-speech. | tweets_hate_speech_detection |
0entailment
| "Rescue my soul from their destructions, my darling from the lions." -- Psalm 35:17 | This example is male. | blog_authorship_corpus/gender |
0entailment
| "Rescue my soul from their destructions, my darling from the lions." -- Psalm 35:17 | This example is Aries. | blog_authorship_corpus/horoscope |
2contradiction
| "Rescue my soul from their destructions, my darling from the lions." -- Psalm 35:17 | This example is HumanResources. | blog_authorship_corpus/job |
2contradiction
| How do I get cheap or free furniture? | This example is judgmental. | open_question_type |
0entailment
| Encouraging news about reversing heart disease | This example is false. | health_fact |
2contradiction
| It's hail crackled across the comm, and Tara spun to retake her seat at the helm. How long was the storm? an hour | This example is no. | mc_taco |
0entailment
| The severity of the haemorrhagic diathesis prompted us to describe the case in order to draw the attention of medical personnel to the dangerous potentiation effects of different drugs administered with vitamin K antagonists. | This example is Not-Related. | ade_corpus_v2/Ade_corpus_v2_classification |
0entailment
| X wants to know about Y's music preferences. Have you been to a live concert?
Not for a long time | This example is Yes. | circa |
2contradiction
| In paragraph 10 it staes that on April 5th 1998 a global surveyor flew over Cydonia with a camera 10 times sharper than the photo taken in the original 1976 picture, shown to prove that on this picture the closer up it looks less like a face. But this wasn't the end of the research. | This example is Adequate. | EffectiveFeedbackStudentWriting |
0entailment
| potential interest : Rubashkin at times paid as much as 11 days late causing a loss of $3,800.51 of potential interest. :
possible attention : Rubashkin at times paid as much as 11 days late causing a loss of $3,800.51 of possible attention. : | This example is negative. | phrase_similarity |
0entailment
| Scientists have found that the Endog gene in rats and mice influences the thickness of the muscular heart wall, how well the heart pumps and how much fat accumulates inside the organ.
Inhibition of Endog in cultured cardiomyocytes resulted in an increase in cell size and hypertrophic biomarkers in the absence of pro-hypertrophic stimulation. | This example is same. | scientific-exaggeration-detection |
0entailment
| Both Linda and Keith leave for work at the same time. Linda drives in her car and Keith is walking. If they've both been traveling for two hours, who is more likely to have covered less distance? (A) Linda (B) Keith | This example is B. | quarel |
0entailment
| Drake's debut studio album is certified platinum.
Jonas Bloch -LRB- born February 8 , 1939 -RRB- is a Brazilian actor .. actor. actor. Most known for his television roles as villains , Bloch is descendant of Ukrainian-Jewish people and father of actress Debora Bloch .. Debora Bloch. Debora Bloch | This example is not_related. | fever-evidence-related/mwong--fever-related |
0entailment
| Plants are categorized into <mask> groups. | This example is two. | numer_sense |
2contradiction
| Most of the larger humidors I have been in, only fill the shelves by stocking the empty space with crap cigars. | This example is neutral. | dynasent/dynabench.dynasent.r1.all/r1 |
0entailment
| By far the best hotdog I've not ever had. | This example is positive. | dynasent/dynabench.dynasent.r2.all/r2 |
0entailment
| Bob Parks made a similar <e1>offer</e1> in a <e2>phone call</e2> made earlier this week. | This example is Message-Topic(e2,e1). | sem_eval_2010_task_8 |
0entailment
| what branch of army was dwight d eisenhower in
Eisenhower is often ranked highly among the U.S. Presidents. | This example is False. | wiki_qa |
2contradiction
| Basil loves office products but doesn't like cereal grains. Robin bought a wheat kernel for his birthday. True or False: Basil will like the present. | This example is True. | cycic_classification |
2contradiction
| A museum almost never closes | This example is yes. | commonsense_qa_2.0 |
2contradiction
| This moron is so bitter, he believes Scotland is the glue holding us together, without it we'd all simply become a bunch of white hooded racists..... | This example is hate. | dynahate |
0entailment
| Costs of disability pensions are steadily growing in Western countries, mainly in Europe and the United States. It was reported that, in the UK, expenditure on disability pensions accounted for 0.9% of gross domestic product (GDP) in 1980; two decades later it had reached 2.6% of GDP. Several studies have reported a link between inability or unwillingness to take time off from work for sickness and an elevated risk of future disability pension.
Does it sound like disability in later life is caused by factors that prevent employees from getting proper care earlier in life? | This example is YES. | CONDAQA |
2contradiction
| I want to start off by saying this will not win me any favors here, but I try not to be exclusive as much as I can. I make it absolutely clear with any and all of my partners. I'm a hedonist and enjoy keeping a roster of girls as long as I'm transparent about it. And yes, I'm in it mostly for the sex and intimacy and little else. I also make this absolutely clear.
Just a few hrs back I met a girl in a bar who was smoking hot, absolutely a charmer, and within an hour or so, our flirtations led to a lot more. Naturally, I invited her over to my place and things were going hot and heavy. She loved some of the fun we had (she said she had to be back for something shortly past midnight) and while texting on her cab ride back, I mentioned how sexy her ass was and that I was looking forward to having fun there.
She immediately got cold in her responses and said there mostly won't be any build up. Even when she'd had some fun times in the past and I promised her I'll do things right. I realized that it's a huge part of my sexual repertoire, I'd love to indulge in a NSA relationship only if most or all things are on the table, and told her it was a fun night but since I didn't see any escalation in places I liked or the kind of kinky stuff I wanted, we weren't as sexually compatible as I thought and to call it to an end there.
Her last response was, and I quote verbatim, so you don't think I'm bullshitting: "You really think you'll have more fun than that with someone like me? Good luck enjoying some skank's ass .. asshole and don't message me ever again."
I'm not planning to. But am I the asshole here, really? | This example is RIGHT. | scruples |
2contradiction
| PersonX plays something else Because PersonX wanted to be free of boredom
PersonX has been locked up in the quarantine for a very long time. | This example is weakener. | defeasible-nli/atomic |
2contradiction
| A little boy jumping off of a dock into a lake. A little boy pushed into a lake
The boy's arms are flailing wildly. | This example is weakener. | defeasible-nli/snli |
0entailment
| No singer is a researcher.
Every sailor is a potter.
No potter is a sailor.
Some historian blindfolds some clown.
Some dancer is an astronaut.
Every chef is an astronaut.
Every potter disappoints every detective.
Every clown blindfolds every researcher.
Some clown hunts no potter.
No historian is a dancer.
No botanist is a researcher.
Some potter disappoints every chef.
Every clown is a singer.
Every researcher is an astronaut.
Every botanist is a clown.
Some singer is not a botanist.
No detective is a historian.
Every sailor is a singer.
| This example is consistent. | natural-language-satisfiability |
0entailment
| Emptying with awe was Hiawatha.
Filled with awe was Hiawatha. | This example is Contradiction. | FLUTE |
2contradiction
| Are ground bell peppers the main ingredient of black pepper? | This example is False. | strategy-qa |
2contradiction
| If a legislator is found guilty of stealing government funds, they will be suspended from office. Tiffany T. Alston was a legislator in Maryland's House of Delegates from 2011 to 2013. Tiffany T. Alston was found guilty of stealing government funds in 2012.
Tiffany T. Alston was not suspended from the Maryland House of Delegates. | This example is True. | folio |
2contradiction
| Early Egyptians’ writing system were Hieroglyph.
Hieroglyphic scripting method is currently out-dated. | This example is no. | avicenna |
2contradiction
| ABBA produced some great tunes which are sung allover. | This example is false. | CREAK |
0entailment
| We have three blocks, A, B and C. There is one medium black square in block A. Below block A is block B which has a medium blue square and one medium yellow square. Below the medium yellow square there is the medium blue square. To the right of block A there is block C which contains a medium black square and a medium yellow square. The medium black square is below the medium yellow square.
Is the black thing which is below a yellow square , above any medium squares that are below a medium square? | This example is DK. | spartqa-yn |
0entailment
| Franklin, Francisco, Curtis, Michael, Freddie, Derek, Chris, Kelly, Salvador, Lewis, Randy, Aaron and Guy have visited Singapore
Guy didn't visit Singapore | This example is contradiction. | clcd-english |
0entailment
| Does human have a job
sportsman | This example is True. | twentyquestions |
2contradiction
| I hated this movie. I knew it would be chocked full of camp and silliness like the original series. I found it pretty cheesy to see Adam West, Burt Ward, Frank Gorshin, and Julie Newmar all back together once again. Anyone who loved the Batman series from the 60's should have enjoyed Return to the Batcave. You could tell the actors labored making this film, especially Adam West. And I'll bet he would have gladly jumped back into his Batman costume had the script required him to do so. I told a number of friends about this movie who chose not to view it... now they are glad they didn't. I have all of the original 120 episodes on VHS. Now this movie will not join my collection. No Thank You for the reunion Adam and Burt. | This example is Positive. | counterfactually-augmented-imdb |
0entailment
| will there be a season 4 of da vinci's demons | This example is False. | boolq-natural-perturbations |
2contradiction
| I guess you could put 10 rounds in them them because it's Californiacation reload then another10, reload then another 10. I would have shit out 3 30 round mags with 90 bullets to your 30. Why do you even live there? | This example is explicit_hate. | implicit-hate-stg1 |
2contradiction
| Erin is strong. Erin is high. Erin is huge. Charlie is little. Charlie is short. Harry is smart. Harry is wealthy. Harry is kind. Gary is bad. Gary is dull. Gary is poor. Strong people are smart. If someone is little and short then they are small. If someone is bad and dull then they are rough. If someone is smart and wealthy then they are quiet. All small people are thin. All smart people are wealthy. All quiet people are nice. All rough people are sad.
Charlie is thin. | This example is False. | PARARULE-Plus |
0entailment
| The parents of the bride were happy to see their daughter so in love.
The parents of the groom were happy to see their son so in love. | This example is False. | ambient |
0entailment
| Generally, dews are nibble or soakable. | This example is False. | I2D2 |
0entailment
| You seem to have no understanding of basic physics or aerodynamics. Question 1 'The 9-11 videos of the planes impacting the WTC Towers shows both planes melting into the towers without slowing down and not even a bolt or piece of carbon fiber falling to the ground below. This violates the fundamental 3rd law of motion without a equal and opposite reaction. I challenge anyone still believing the official conspiracy theory to explain how a reaction would also not be occur if the plane was standing still and the building smashed into it traveling at 500 mph?' The official conspiracy theory? I was under the impression you were the conspiracy theorist. The 3rd law of motion [1], just to recap is 'Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. This picture clearly shows the damage caused to the Twin towers by this equal and opposite reaction. http://3.bp.blogspot.com... The plane flowed into the hole fluidly. In your heads-I-win-tails-you-lose logic, if even one part of the event were not true then therfore there must have been a conspiracy. Question 2 'Also all planes create a wing vortex from the trailing edge of the wing tips acting like a horizontal twister. Which should have been clearly seen in the smoke from the fire ball after impact. This is definitely missing and should not be in both impacts . Why?' I'm going to choose to ignore the double negative, and assume that you mean that it should be there. A wing vortex of an airplane is created by the plane's forward movement. This cannot occur if , like in the Twin Tower incident the wings are sheared off, and have no forward movement. The direction that the wing vortexes face is directly behind the wings, the plane was at a 20 degree angle. Therefore, no wing vortex. QED. My point: Occam's razor. What is more likely, that there was a terrorist atrocity commited, or that hundreds of thousands of people are participating in a conspiracy theory. Who would we suspect? The government? Point of reference, not including the post office has over 1.9 million employees. In the face of the hard cold facts, I challenge my opponent to refute them. Thank you [1] http://en.wikipedia.org...'s_laws_of_motion [2] Popular Mechanics, debunking 9/11 myths, 2002
The plane impact with the WTC | This example is PRO. | args_me |
2contradiction
| legalizing prostitution will further demean a woman or man and result in unnecessary violence.
We should legalize prostitution | This example is in favor of. | Touche23-ValueEval |
0entailment
| The crime is very dangerous.
Ban on laser pointers | This example is PRO. | starcon |
2contradiction
| How can I obtain a disposable virtual card? | This example is disposable_card_limits. | banking77 |
2contradiction
| Since it was raining, I carried the newspaper over my backpack to keep it dry. The it is more likely to refer to my backpack than The newspaper because my backpack was very safe to carry newspaper
In "Since it was raining, I carried the newspaper over my backpack to keep it dry. ", The it is more likely to refer to my backpack than The newspaper because my backpack was very safe to carry newspaper | This example is True. | winowhy |
0entailment
| In the stimulus 15 million dollars went to build a bigger better airport for the town of Ouzinkie Alaska population 165 | This example is not cognitive-bias. | mbib-base/cognitive-bias |
0entailment
| Unconfirmed reports gunmen asked for people by name before killing editor and cartoonist CharlieHebdo | This example is fake-news. | mbib-base/fake-news |
0entailment
| Oh sweetie I don t do passive aggressive I m aggressive aggressive | This example is not gender-bias. | mbib-base/gender-bias |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.