Datasets:

tcapelle

/

kaggle-toxic-annotated-filtered

like 0

" To the circumcision boss said that ""banned is banned."" Son, you might want to take an Introduction to Western Civilization course at your local community college. You're so unfamiliar with the Enlightenment that you don't realize that ""banned"" is a badge of honor in the history of human progress. 82.128.204.29 "

Those were attempts at tweaking it to work when logged-out. The page model is a bit different then, and in other skins. Cheers,

Hey treasury I hate to break it to you but one of the other users saw what you did. You won't be around here much longer once I get unblocked. You and ryulong think you are very clever but another user also saw you do it. Apparently you are not as smart as you think you are. You WILL be banned permanently as soon as I am unblocked and I can report what you did and the other user will confirm it that you did the same thing to their edits.

By the way, there is no evidence, except that reported on blogs, that Sanchez is in porn videos. Sure, people could go rent them and watch, but that would be original research and he appeeared under pseudonyms. So you might as well go ahead and eliminate any mention of his porno too. Face it, that's what you want to do anyway. So you might as well get it over with. Down the memory hole at Wikipedia!

I agree. BTW, same story about Navahradak being capital is also repeated on Belarus article. I think these disputes about various national ways to present history of GDL should be on article Grand Duchy of Lithuania and everyone who wants to read more about the Duchy would click the link.

" Thanks for the update, and my aplogogies for not assuming better faith about the listing errors. — Talk "

By the way, I am and always was happy to fix up any specific issues with my edits that Elf brought to my attention (provided they weren't totally unreasonable), but I received no such requests from Elf, all he would do is revert the whole lot without consultation with me first.

" I find it interesting though that he removed the link to his still intact Userpage talk archive where there seems no alleged ""death threat"" issue either other than regarding his flame-wars with "

OOT Bosses I have something I wanted to discuss with you, but I didn't to bring it up in the public talk pages. I saw that you been leaving various messages on the talk pages of other contributors. And they seem to point the blame at the article changes at myself and the other gent who worked on it. Now I'll take respnosibility, because I contributed. But, you can't very well sit there and act like you weren't part of it. We brought the idea for change up, and you agreed to it. Heck, you even did most of the work. So I'd appreciate it if in the future you didn't try to act like we did something bad against your will. And maybe I'm reading too much into this, and if that's the case, then I apologize in advance. But that's just the way it seems to me.

Notable alumni section I removed several people from this section because they do not have their own Wikipedia article, which is required to establish notability. The information I removed is: Jennifer O'Malley Dillon, executive director of the Democratic National Committee, Bob Ward, Fox 25 News Reporter,Gerry Leone, Attorney, Former DA Middlesex County and James Vallee, Attorney, Former House of Representatives Majority Leader. Thanks

" I'm sorry; I was lazy. Here's where I got the information about the diphthongal variants of , and they make it clear in the references that Wells (1982a) is Wells, J.C. Accents of English 1: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. They also say Cruttenden (2001) is Cruttenden, A. (2001) Gimson's Pronunciation of English. 6th edn. London: Arnold. A Handbook of Varieties of English (Bernd Kortmann, Edgar W. Schneider, Walter de Gruyter, 2004) is where I got the information about monophthongization in Cockney; they, in turn, referenced Wells (1982). In this case, ""Wells (1982: 309)"" refers to Wells, J.C. Accents of English 2 The British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. There you go. "

Hmm, thanks. But it's a nasty hack really ... — Martin ( · talk)

" I understand you, but you also should understand me. You shouldn't revert my work. As you can see, I don't disrupt your edits at articles Draza Mihailovic, Josip Broz Tito, or at Template:Yugoslav Axis collaborationism. I realy respect your effort and work there, and I don't revert it. I have no desire to get blocked, or to drag you into another blockade. I want to resolve all this disputes with you. As you can see I already changed Template:Politics of Yugoslavia to a neutral, non-image version. These are my proposals to you: 1) If we put in place your version of the list of Yugoslav Prime Ministers, it will remove Drago Marusic as Prime Minister in 1945, between Ivan Subasic and Tito. If you agree to left him on the list, this dispute is over. If we agree about Marusic, we can also agree about the issue ""Kingdom or DF Yugoslavia"". 2) Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was a complete different state than Serbia and Montenegro. It wasn't like Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes and Kingdom of Yugoslavia, or Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia and Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. In 2003, after the adoption of the Constitutional Charter, whole system of government was changed. Even the position of the Prime Minister was abolished, and merged with the position of the President. Those two countries realy need a separate articles. Also, their armies need a separate articles. 3) Articles President of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and President of Serbia and Montenegro should remain separate. The last President of FRY was Vojislav Kostunica, from 2000 until 2003 when he was replaced by Svetozar Marovic of SCG (2003-2006). Those two offices was very different (President of FRY wasn't both head of state and head of government, like President of SCG). 4) Prime Minister of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia wasn't ""Prime Minister of Serbia and Montenegro"", but of FRY. That article should retain its current name. 5) As you can see, yesterday I changed Template:Politics of Yugoslavia to a neutral, non-image version. I hope that you agree with this version. P.S. I'm sorry if you think that people from the Balkans are uncivilized. It's not true, believe me. We aren't better or worse than other peoples. "

William Wilberforce No worries. I had noticed the question of attribution, and had a look at the Ferens site before uploading, but saw nothing about the issue. I hadn't thought to look on the Talk page. Thanks for letting me know. Regards,

you gotta let somebody love you.

" Great peace-keeping! That solved the problem in my opinion. ™ "

Hi Sometimes you are wright! Sometimes I am rihgt! Sometimes we are wright.

I think he is a gay fag!!!

Seems likely from their descriptions.

File:CTI Measurements.jpg listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CTI Measurements.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

" I am really sorry about your relatives, but any reasonable person, as I know you are, should agree that the persecution of the Copts, the massacre in Luxor cannot be compared to a collapsed building. Copts are important part of Egyptian society. I am not saying that the whole section that you deleted should be included, but a few sentences should. Here's an extract from Speigel: ""Copts make up the largest Christian community in the Arab world and around 8 million Egyptians belong to the Coptic Church. They're barred from high government positions, diplomatic service and the military, as well as from many state benefits. Universities have quotas for Coptic students considerably lower than their actual percentage within the population.Building new churches isn't allowed, and the old ones are falling into disrepair thanks to a lack both of money and authorization to renovate. When girls are kidnapped and forcibly converted, the police don't intervene. Thousands of pigs were also slaughtered under the pretense of confining swine flu. Naturally all were owned by Christians. The same with Luxor's massacre. For example see article Spain. It talks about bombing in commuter trains in Madrid, Spain on 11 March 2004. Egypt should have a few sentences about the massacre in Luxor's too. "

Neutrality Can we get a professional that's not employed by humanewatch.org to clean up this article PLEASE.

Why do you assume that I'm a native speaker of English? Why don't you simply accept that I'm having messages relayed from an alien planet on which, despite multifarious differences, something akin to the Roman alphabet developed in parallel, complete with 'e,' 'o,' and the 'ee'/'oo' innovation in the more advanced cultures? Why do you insist on putting something called 'regularity' (= 'one grapheme one function'?) above efficiency in conveying the full range and variety of phonemes? Stereotypically German or what?

I would value your opinion on this The recent ugly behavior of a user in Istanbul Pogrom along with my fruitful collaborating with a Turkish editor on some articles have made me think if there is a way to deal with all this mutual suspicion among Greek and Turkish wikipedians. So I came up with the idea of a wikiProject where Greek and Turkish wikipedians work together assumming good faith and trying to overcome the said suspicion. I have written a . I would greatly appreciate it if you would read it and comment on it. Could it be done? Is there any point in trying? Does it brake any wikipedia anti-cabal rules? Thank you in advance!

" Reply to Mr. Burdak I am glad to see you have at least referenced that quote now - it was not at all clear before where it came from. As it does not agree with standard translations of that passage, one wonders about the unusual wording - so reminiscent of the odd ""quote"" you made from the Mahabharata the other day. But, more importantly, what about the completely false ""reference"" to ""The History of Civilizations of Central Asia, Vol. II""? Why have you (again) not replied to my pointing out of this apparent dishonesty? This is only the most recent in a very long list of false ""quotes"" and ""references"" you have made and I have exposed on these pages - as you well know. Now, I am willing to accept that maybe one or two false quotes could be the result of honest mistakes or sloppy research - but when the process is repeated over and over and over again one begins to suspect that the author is doing it deliberately and intends to deceive readers. So, quite naturally, I and others have come to mistrust any quotes you may give - especially to sources that are difficult to check. I am sorry - but you have brought this situation upon yourself. "

My user page Thanks for reverting the vandalism on it. (Talk|Contribs)

I'm gay, I'm gay and I don't care who knows it. Sorry, I have sudden outbursts. Anyway, obviously

" Evidence Redux I'll be frank. The blocking of came a bit late for my taste. However, he was found to be in violation of the 3 revert rule, and to again quote the policy which ironically Malke was threatening people with and was himself found to be in violation of: "" A bright line exists on edit warring, known as the three-revert rule (3RR). If an administrator has not acted already by this point, then action is very likely, especially if a report is made to the noticeboard. Policy forbids edit warring generally, and editors may be blocked if they edit war, with or without breaching 3RR. "" I commend for taking the actions he did. The subsequent complaints Malke made, and his promise to cease his activity in order to get unblocked a few days later, are a matter of record on his user talk page. Malke has since deleted the notifications, but they are viewable in his talk page history, and make interesting reading. After Malke's block on August 19, 2009, I decided I needed to take a step back. For the past ten days I have busied myself with other Wikipedia subjects. I now return to this page. I suggest we talk a bit about what happened, and I also suggest we take a look at what happened here this month, edit by edit. It continues to seem clear to me that Malke was editing with obsession towards an agenda; his obsession got him in hot water with the admins. Soon, Wikipedia policy is going to change, as many here know. I'd welcome some reasonable discussion, and renewed work on the article. On closer examination of the history pages of the main article, it appears some of Malke's biased edits, through sheer volume, are still in effect. I propose going through every edit of his, see exactly what changes of his have survived, and put back all relevant, sourced material. Once that is effected, we can pick up the chore of dealing with further improvements. Having just returned to WP from an extended absence, I am not fully familiar with what has occurred with this article, but cursory skimming of the talk page reminds me of some of the frustrations which led me to leave WP more than a year ago. I recognize Malke's concerns. Material that is added back should strictly follow WP:BLP, ie., it should be directly relevant to Rove, not defamatory, and should be sourced by reliable secondary sources. Malke's concerns were one thing, his methods another. Admins blocked him not only due to his violation of the three edit rule, but because he was deleting paragraphs of properly sourced material, and as the admins noted (to quote directly from Malke's talk page history, since he has since, for obvious reasons, deleted all reference to his blocking): - *An impartial administrator just did; I don't know you from Adam, and haven't so much as looked at the contents of your edits; all that matters is that you broke WP:3RR, and received a short block for it; if you want to be unblocked, all you have to do is agree to stop edit warring, regardless of whether you think it is justified or not. :==( o ) '''I highly commend the admins, and urge others to support their work. These admins had not been involved here previously; they took firm, direct action on a disruptive editor, Malke, who was judged to be making ""untrue"" statements regarding his efforts. I again suggest we move past this period of turmoil and examine what changes were made to this article by an editor whose tactics earned him a block and who, in my view, obse

, 24 January 2010 (UTC) Wikipedia is hosted in the US, so US laws on copyright, etc. are enforcable. That's just the way it is, and we need to avoid legal action being taken against the foundation. To be honest, I don't see big differences in behaviour of editors by nationality, so far as nationality is apparent - I suspect that there are just more Americans here than any other nationality, simply due to sizes of populations of English-speakers, so any group of editors is likely to have more Americans than anything else, including the helpful, constructive, thoughtful ones. I think, however, that there are a higher proportion of editors here now than ever before who have little interest in adding and improving content, preferring to delete, argue, try to raise the bar on notability and fair use guidelines to allow more to be deleted, etc., but I don't see this as a wholly US phenomenon. 08:15

Your discarding of vandalism complaints Re a recent vandalism report I submitted , the user in question has received numerous complaints, including from bots, and has resumed the same independent activity after being blocked a couple weeks ago. The user is rarely using authoritative references but apparently only what turns up first on Google. I'd feel differently if the vandal were responding at all to any complaints or if the user weren't making dozens of similar edits each day. I've learned my lesson from you and I won't complain about this user again, and I certainly won't report any others that regularly trash WP with similar types of rumors and fake references, so I don't expect a reply from you, but I think you are making a serious mistake by not treating this as vandalism and immediately imposing restraints. —

Merge is now complete. I removed a section recently added about the content of a current issue, leaving in the text and references about the magazine itself. -

Trust me, Mr. wants the world to know he's gay. I'm on him hte minute he gets home from school. I wish you no ill will, but my son was on the computor at 3:16 this morning. That won't fly. He is learning a lot from these on-line debates. Are you?

See the news out today in the press: Un parque nacional español se cuela entre los 10 más visitados del mundo. He says the Teide is the 9th most visited in the world today. Do you have anything to say?.83.40.237.202

We needs must be very careful to present these in historical context and without original synthesis, but they are notable to the topic of how parapsychology interacts with other disciplines. A less controversial (and less notable) parallel might be how music theorists have viewed the use of synthesizers in rock music over the last few decades. - 2/0 (cont.)

Vergina Sun the pic is within fair use as it was made by a person i know and given to the public domain. that's a non-issue.

(talk • contribs)

Also, please have a look at Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and don't create artciles unless you can demonstrate that their subjects satisfy those guidelines.

" I notice you reported me for saying I'm webmeister. Um, why? Because I am. I really am the member ""webmeister"" from that forum. What do you particularly wrong with that? "

73 – Masada and end of Jewish-Roman War

If some people are anti-catholic then their just biggots.

You ignored him too

, as User:Dr.K wasn't saying it in the article

LaserActive Hi SchuminWeb, I am confused by your removal of the LaserActive link to the virtual LaserActive museum. Did you have a chance to explore that a little (like on the left, check various sections)? Cheers, -CyRo

Lists of Islamic Jihads

" URL Update (update to my previous, and only, post) I checked today and verified that the ""original"" 'chucknorrisfacts' URL is working (vs. the 'replacement' URL mentioned in my previous post 'thechucknorrisfacts'.)"

A person living in Canada has just as much right as anyone else in the world to research and own a particular dog (or anything else). You, nor the Koolie Club of Australia, have patented sole rights to these dogs. Wikipedia is all about correct information and NOT theories and your own ideas of what happened, what was and what will be.... Wikipedia is based on facts, which clearly has been stated on the German Coolie page and not the Australian Koolie page.

" Thank you. Given the misuse of tools here and the itchy trigger finger as exemplified by the thread above, this ""admin"" needs to be examined by Arbcom. I'm not surprised to see a thread already open at ANI discussing it's recent behavioural trends. I won't be initiating anything but will most certainly be presenting evidence at the appropriate time. In the meantime someone needs to tell this ""admin"" to calm the fuck down and stop removing comments mad by editors on their own talk pages. That's a blockable offence, especially when they were told to never post here again. INVOLVED much? "

Based on the above discussion it is abundantly clear that there is no consensus for insertion of the third criteria repeatedly inserted by disruptive edits ignoring the talk page completely. Also unacceptable is editing the list based on the new criteria within the same edit that changed it.

If it's irrelevant I'll remove it. The sentence adds nothing at all to anyone's understanding of the murder.

" Grant specifically says that ""no attempt to enforce the rule of nonrecognition as regards East Jerusalem seems to have been made at U.N. level. No occasion for enforcement has been afforded in regard to the Golan Heights"". Also, Grant is the only guy I could find who calls UN General Assembly resolutions ""regimes of non-recognition"" and I believe that using this term is misleading and not neutral. So not ""sourced reliably"" and not ""written in a neutral style"". I would also suggest that reverting after a specific BRD request, even if only doing it once or twice per day is edit warring and disruptive. I'm sure ArbCom frowns on that sort of thing as well. "

Or, I could scan the articles and place them online in a directory on my webserver....what is the community's pleasure?

I have just followed from your edit exchange on the article Blu-Ray Disc to find the exchange above. Sadly, you appear to know little about the subject, and to be fair, it has become confusing because much of the terminology has become abused. First, European Blu-Ray discs are not produced in 24p format. That is almost exclusively the preserve of the American regions. Secondly, the Blu-Ray format does not support the proper 1080 progressive high definition formats (1080/50p and 1080/60p (and I include the 59.95p in that). This is because the data rate is not fast enough for these formats. The European sourced discs that state 1080p on the packaging are discs produced from film originated material and is one of the abuses of the term progressive. The term progressive strictly defines a video format where the lines of video information are recorded in strict numerical order, 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 ... 1078 - 1079 -1080. Alternatively, there is the interlaced format which displays the odd lines ony first (odd field) and then follows them by the even lines (even field). (You probably know this already). 1 - 3 - 5 - 7 ... 1077 - 1079 - 2 - 4 - 6 ... 1078 - 1080 They are actually stored in the digital video frame the other way around due to the digital video format's origins in the NTSC world. In true video source material, the even field displays a time slice that is 20 milliseconds later than the odd field and the two together give a comlete video frame. This is also largely true in the Americas, except the even field precedes the odd field by ~16.6 miliiseconds. There is a largish group of enthusiasts (if that's the right word) who have become somewhat anally retentive over the progressive video formats and who have convinced themselves that progressive is the only way to go. The reality is that any improvement in the visual perception of the video is marginal at best and certainly not worth the doubling of the required digital data to support it. But for them, everything has to be progressive. I shall coin the word 'progressivists' for this discussion. When film originated material is transferred to video in Europe, the film is run slightly fast by 4% which allows one film frame to occupy both the the odd and even fields of the video frame (known as 2:2 pulldown). Thus the even field displays a time slice that is 0 milliseconds later than the odd field. In order to satisfy the progressivists, the Blu-Ray producers state that such material is in 1080p format, but using something called a 'Progressive Segmented Frame' technique (though they don't mention that last bit on the box). That is: that it is progressive video, but the odd lines have been recorded together and then they are followed by the even lines. It is really interlaced video, but by the time the display device or the Blu-ray player has de-interlaced the video (it doesn't matter one jot where it actually happens), the result is perceptually indistinguishable from true 1080/25p video (assuming the deinterlacing algorithm works properly). If watched on a CRT display then, of course, the video will be interlaced as there is no deinterlacing prior to display, but with that number of lines, no one is likely to notice (unless they sit inches away from the screen). The description 1080p on the box is, technically at least, wrong but percetually the same as 1080/25p video. The 4% speed up goes completely un-noticed especially these days when the sound is adjusted back to the original pitch - and obviously you hadn't noticed it yourself if you had convinced yourself that you were watching films at the original speed. Once we cross to the Americas, different problems occur. Obviously, running the film at 30 frames per second is not an option, so instead, film is converted to video by storing the same film frame on 3 half video frames, followed by storing the next frame on 2 half video frames and then repeating 3 - 2 - 3 - 2. Thus 4 film frames occupy 5 video frames (the technique is 3:2 pulldown - often wrongly called 2:3 pulldown). Properly deinterlaced, such material is perfectly watchable and the viewer unlikely to feel anything is wrong. But the progressivists have decided that it is not the way to watch film material and have even invented faults to justify a move to a progressive format. I have even seen claims (obviously failing to understand the technique) that movement in the resultant video is uneven in that it jumps 50% further every other jump due to the 3 half fields. The result was the 24p format. The only problem with the 24p format is that if you try to watch it on a CRT display (and A CRT is still unbeatable for contrast and colour reproduction), the result will be unviewable to bad flicker - something that was known as long ag

Oh I was just wondering, I'm something of a fan myself. You've made some pretty good articles; all the best.

" I guess I should fill you in with the whole generation controversy. Some of the editors here claimed that grouping consoles by generation is original research because groupings have been inconsistent from source to source. The whole thing can be seen here, although nothing new has been said for several months, now. ''''''[✆Talk] "

, spent by private U.S. citizens

" Replaceable fair use Image:CarolLombard.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:CarolLombard.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. "

Hypercritical? On the 10th anniversary, and the first time you dare feature a list on mainpage? No way. It was supposed to be our chance to get it right, make it perfect. Why not directly tell us a week in advance that this list was the one you'd be featuring for the anniversary to give us a chance to shine it up and correct all the issues?

Hi. Drop a note on the talk page of that article asking for it to be added. But, note that the article will likely be replaced by a redirect anyway. (comment)

" ""The WWE Raw guest host initiative was introduced on June 15, 2009 by Donald Trump during his time as owner of the Raw franchise."" This is Wikipedia all over. Listing stories as facts...Jesus Christ. Grow a brain, the first step might be to stop watching a product churned solely for children (not WWE, ALL PRO WRESTLING.86.128.14.112 "

" I've provided a citation that doesn't include Albert (or any other corps commander) in the list of principal commanders. In other words, unless you can provide a source that does, what you are doing constitutes Original Research and is not allowed. I'll remove Albert and replace the Prussian commanders per the source tomorrow to give you time to find a competing source. And remember to make it Reliable. Don't bother replying unless you have a source to supply, because you're simply repeating yourself.  •T•C•E• "

" The problem is, 11 of the sources (and the most reliable ones) are all supporting one single sentence in the article. (talk) "

FUCKING FAGGOT LOLWAT.

" our previous conversation you fucking shit eating liberal, you make lady bird johnson shake on her tampon. I said fucking sorry for my little brother and you still had to fucking complain. My life is fucking shit. My mother is always yelling at me and my dad beats the shit out of me if I get fucking out of line. My brother's one outlet is wikipedia. He cried when he saw my father smacking me, and his tears clogged his mac book pro's keyboard. we had to go to fucking apple and get a new one, all out of my mom's pocket. then last night i wanted to take this hot pussy from connecticut out in my dad's new rolls-royce and he said fucking no. so you know what I fucking did? I fucking cut his pinky off and didnt snitch like a little bitch like you. I take lazy ass niggers like you and stomp you with my fat nazi heel. you should be FUCKING sorry you ever fucked with me or my dad (Steve Jobs). And if I find out your using Linux, I'll take pity on thee. Cause you're just too stupid to understand shit. i can see your fucking at some fucking computer and you think that you have some power on this fucking site. let me tell you something you little bitch. when i'm doing coke off strippers titties in da clubz, you can just edit some fucking wikipedia articles. i smoke a phat blunt every damn day, and you smoke your mom's fucking tea. So, in closing, as Shakespeare said in Sonnet ninety-four (I believe): ""things turn sourest by their deeds. Lillies that fester smell far worse than (fucking) weeds."" fuck you and heil hitler. -n. jobs ps- if you ever fucking ban this ip again, there is going to be some serious shit thats gonna happen. i know a fucking guy."

" Response I am obviously very disappointed by this decision. The assertion that I did not read the article is highly misleading, not to mention offensive. I have been a Wikipedia editor for many, many years, and have followed the rules and regulations throughout these years. To suggest that I did not follow the regulations is complete bunkum. Using the evidence present in the article, I made a choice based on what I thought was a fairly obvious case - it STILL breaks our rules on blogs, recentism, notability, and bias. The ""keep"" votes are from people who have an immense level of conflict of interest, and therefore skew the vote something rotten. I am very disappointed that this entire episode has been carried out at my expense, rather than at the article itself. This response will be copied to as many concerned editors in this matter. wordsdeeds "

→ From WP:Third opinion: The inclusion of that section gives undue weight to a particular pre-Hungary period in this article, Hungary. Such material would be better placed at Hungarian prehistory or Pannonian Basin before the Hungarians, with links to Great Moravia where appropriate. The current article is almost 200 kb long, and needs more concise summaries more than it needs additional sections. When deciding how much space and depth to devote to a particular aspect of a topic, it is important to take recourse to general sources and reflect their coverage. Beyond the reliable sources threshold, the trustworthiness of a particular source is less important for determining weight in the treatment of a topic than is its generality. As an outsider, I could see adding up to a few dozen words based on the lingering impact of toponyms and script. As a side note, please remember to stay focused on improving the article without recourse to personal attacks on other editors. As well, I remind you that whenever text is copied from one article to another, you must include this fact in your edit summary. - 2/0 (cont.)

I am not a martyr. I am a human, and humans make mistakes. I did too, many mistakes.

Categories I have removed the Extreme Sport category, as most cavers do not consider their sport Extreme. It is only some noncavers who think it might be.

Hey Drmies, are you ok? I can't imagine what I must have said on that IP's page to get you so upset that you've decided to literally track my every edit. Isn't there anything better that you can do with your time instead of THIS? You know, like move away from your computer and go out, talk to people and form friendships in real life? You've said you have a family with a kid to take care of, but I now find that very hard to believe because I would assume you wouldn't have so much time for this nonsense if that were really the case. I seriously hope I haven't hurt your feelings that much to prevent you from performing your daily duties off the world wide web. I would feel badly if that were the case, which now seems it actually is. Call me vandal all you like, it doesn't matter to me. I wish you well. 125.39.16.85

I too agree with your suggestion. Thanks for taking this on.

" Elton John has not sold less albums than Queen in the UK, he's had lower sales per album, but the total sales of his albums is the UK is more than Queen. Also the UK RNR Hall Of Fame would have nothing to gain, nothing to loose, by just taking ANY figure. Doesn't mean they checked it by looking at world charts, list of back catalogue sales, etc. Where in my text did I say I didn't like Queen?? Wheatear or not I like them, tolerate them or hate them has nothing to do with it, there is NO source that says ""Queen have world sales of 250 million"". You can't take a bit from one and a bit from the other, you can only use one source. However my point stands, looking at global sales charts, and other sales lists, Queen have not sold 190 million albums, their best selling albums globally are Greatest Hits and Greatest Hits 2 which combined sold 35 million as of now, they havent sold another 155 million besides."

" The quote: ""Growth, Unity and Progress"" provides a fitting description of this municipality at the start of a new century."" is CLEAR evidence of npov writing. No one is resorting to childish rhetoric here except you. "

" Re: ""See also: One-hitter (smoking)"" Please discuss the following edit sequence: (cur | prev) 17:20, 8 July 2011 Mjpresson (talk | contribs) (10,343 bytes) (Tokerdesigner has resumed adding ""one-hitter"" when not contextual) (cur | prev) 17:16, 8 July 2011 Tokerdesigner (talk | contribs) (10,367 bytes) (See also: One hitter; fix Categorization (to Cannabis smoking)) What is ""not contextual"" about helping readers seeking information about ""Cannabis smoking"" find out about low-dosage utensils which can substitute for wasteful, unhealthy ""joint smoking""? Note that the same editor who deletes the link to the ""One-hitter (smoking)"" article has also deleted several pictures (of equipment other than cigarette papers!) from that article, deleted the Australian Department of Health warning against mixing with tobacco (in ""joints"") from the ""Hashish"" and ""Cannabis smoking"" articles, and positioned a ""person smoking a joint"" (cigarette advert) atop the ""Cannabis smoking"" article. Why? "

I'm gonna pull it then. If anyone disagrees with that, put it back and talk about it here. 66.206.186.59

" I did some stuff in my . Seeing as I can't exactly romanize names, can you help me romanize Vampir's one? The kana is ブラッディ‧ドラクル‧ヴァンピール, her full title being Bloody Dracul Vampir in english.ichi "

How they achieved the speed? Interesting mystery about 747SP. Hundreds of pages written about it, how they made it lighter, shorter, more powerful, etc. But nowhere they say what they did to increase the speed. It flew just 200 kph slower than the speed of sound. And it's a good thing. But neither Boeing themselves, nor any other manufacturer ever tried to repeat this feat. Why? With modern airliners being able to cover up to 19,000 km why nobody makes them faster? What was done to the airfoil in that regard? Does anyone know a source where this angle is covered?

and using that to vandalize until it is about to be banned, then repeat the process.''

Apparently Palit is found to be worthy of mention by nvidia, amazon, and pcuniverse: http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_20021017_4141.html http://www.amazon.com/tag/palit%20microsystems http://www.pcuniverse.com/Palit-Microsystems/bs/h/3158 Anyone familiar with newegg knows that it is a top 10 internet retailer in terms of sales, putting it ahead of bestbuy.com, etc. I believe it is the #2 electronics internet retailer, behind dell.com. If your products are on newegg (and on the front page of their video card section), you deserve at least a small article on wikipedia. Unbelievably, eVGA is also marked for deletion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:EVGA_(Company) ... even though eVGA is a VERY well-known maker of video cards and motherboards. In the past few years, I'd assume they've sold $30-50 million in video cards annually... and yet people who know nothing about electronics mark it for deletion. If wikipedia doesn't want sub-10 million in sales corporations to be on it, then I guess Palit may not make the cut, but it seems to me that the notoriety of these companies is mostly called into question by people who don't know a single computer corporation other than Dell, Apple, IBM, and Gateway.

" I would prefer Queen's College, Oxford to The Queen's College, Oxford, in the same way that University of Oxford is used rather than The University of Oxford, and it is shortened to ""Queen's"" rather than ""The Queen's"". "

" This has nothing to do with elegant vs. drastic. I am talking about NOPV and factual accuracy. As for ambiguity and language, Itried tried but you did not like the term ""unequivocal"". "

If no defaultsort is set, the title of the article is the defaultsort. Which was my point. But year titled articles are better off without defaultsorting generally.

How's this? It's a lot shorter, but it's more focussed on the settlement rather than the hall and is now properly sourced (bar the etymology). If you're ok with the changes, I can leave a copy of this conversation on the article's talk page.

Please view my video and pass it on to your friends and colleagues. The more viewers I get, will support my case in the court of public opinion and pressure the three involved companies, Chrysler, Compuware d/b/a Professional Services, and Combustion Components to settle my 11 year homelessness. Search: Corporate Blacklisted engineer I worked as a Mechanical Design Engineer for almost 20 years collectively for the following companies; Pratt and Whitney, Williams International, Ford Motor Company, and as a contract engineer for Compuware d/b/a Professional Services at Chrysler Corporation in Auburn Hills, Mi. It is the latter two to which I am forging my complaint as they told prospective employers, my private investigator and my newspaper reporter, that I was not employed by them, thus blacklisting me, and preventing from all future employment. I believe that they did this to me because I found fault with one of Chrysler’s automotive designs that could have resulted in a safety issue, that they did not want to fix and it was easier and cheaper to get rid of me. I took my case all the way to the Supreme Court in Washington, DC and in Boston’s Federal court ….all courts denied me justice. A lawyer representing Chrysler offered me $1000 to settle the case about 2 years ago which I refused since I felt it was like a slap in the face compared to the injustice they have caused me. Your viewing of my video will greatly help to end my 11 yrs of homelessness by increasing public awareness of my case and consequently, will send Chrysler, Compuware and combustion components a direct message that I am not giving up and refuse to go quietly into the night. Thank you for your time and consideration, Bill Butler Read my story in progress at the following: Click on blog post!

YOU ARE A MISCHIEVIOUS PUBIC HAIR

REDIRECT Talk:Bangkok Bank F.C.

I only mention it because the previous edit was also a reversion, so it might have been wiser to check the edit history first. It shows a string of reversions. I recommended the self revert because you have added back the contentious material, which is contrary to the established convention of discussion before addition that has been adopted in the Obama-related articles.

" You've got no call to start attacking me ad hominem. I know damned well how to use the history and talk pages. As for ""shoddy"" research, I (like many others) consider the school's own style guide to be the final word on the issue. The school's publications are entirely consistent with this. Anyway, I'm through with this. You obviously care about this WAY more than anyone else, I'm sure others will come along and make this correction repeatedly until you back down, since the public style guide is probably what most people will consider the ultimate authority on this. Don't bother messaging me back, I don't care that much. "

Agreed, besides debating it now won't repair destroyed reputation. It won't change that my bot was shut down and it certainly won't change my chances of ever getting the admin tools and being allowed to contribute to WP on par with my knowledge and abilities.

REDIRECT Talk:Harry Yates (footballer, born 1925)

HEY HOW ABOUT SHE PUTS OUT A NEW SINGLE AM I RIGHT OR AM I RIGHT?

Improv What is the name of the part where the violinist improvises? Lestrade

" The bot does keep track, and will not update the same page more often than once every six months. You can make sure this doesn't happen again by adding to the main page; if an infobox is present and does not have an image in the ""image"" field, PhotoCatBot will assume that's the photo the article still needs, and will not add it to . Thanks! "

I certainly noticed you because of the poor edit at Stars Dance (where you formatted an enormous unsourced list of producers added to an album that had been created by another editor with a forged tracklist, an edit for which he has been warned). The edit for which you were blocked was less than nine hours old at the time you were blocked, and was nearly identical to the kinds of edits you were blocked for previously. That previous block was your warning. You don't get to make bad edits in blocks of four.—

" Sorry I find that there's nothing ""honorable"" about samurai ethics, it's largely blind loyalty and fanaticism, and lack any of the Judeo-Christian values such as compassion and mercy. Such are the values indoctrinated into Imperial Japanese soldiers when they slaughtered over 300,000 Chinese civillians in the Nanjing Massacre, tortured Allied POWs in prison camps such as Changi, launched suicide Kamikaze attacks against Allied ships etc. Not even the Germans, who had at least at some Judeo-Christian values left even under the Nazi regime, match the level of fanaticism and pure evil of Imperial Japan.60.242.159.224 "

( I really like this Icon where Can I get it ?)

request for checkuser Hi Got your name form checkusers list, I suspect following users to be involved in sockpuppetry and subsets of the following may be from same IP ,some of them are heavily involved in edit warring and disputes over fully protected article Dawoodi Bohra and other Bohra articles and giving other admins a hard time. One of the user Araz5152 created a hoax article [Qutbi bohra] which had to be completely transformed by another reliable author. So do let me know about the investigation Mufaddalqn SamanthaPuckettIndo Markdrows Md iet Murtazajamali DistributorScientiae Araz5152

Ok I am sorry, but I have created some articles that you have improved, so I'm not all bad.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markus Kaarlonen The article about Markus Kaarlonen was proposed for deletion due to the lack of reliable sources in his article. I have added several sources, but more are needed. Please contribute to the article by adding reliable sources, or at least let me know if there is a source I could use. Thanks. '''''' (talk)

" What do you answer to this: ""Timoshenko was never “heroic”. He was just another New York cop going about his business, shot by a gun-toting crazy. (You seem to have a lot of those in your country.)"" that the aussie sent me... Unfortunately nothing when he's spitting our our cherished country. "

]] Category:Musicians work group articles needing attention

Labeling Season 2B? How should this be done? Netflix's releases for May just came up, and the other 13 episodes of season 2 are listed as May 29th release... only they'll be released as Season 3. So do we label them as Season 3, as Netflix, an official distributor labels them as such, and simply label them as production codes 214-226, or do we label them as season 2, with an addendum stating Netflix released them as a third season? Obviously we have a few weeks, but figure getting a collective agreement on what to do now is better. 99.162.156.148