text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
|---|
2
|
F
|
β
|
2
|
SgˆSΛ
|
2
|
FD
|
Y1SgˆSΛE
|
β
|
2
|
ˆSQS
|
2
|
FD
|
Y2ˆSQSE
|
β
|
2
|
SRpS
|
2
|
FD
|
Y3SRpSE
|
20
|
where Ω SSˆSSQdenotes the variables to be up
|
datedYn3
|
n1are the Lagrange multipliers We then give
|
the update formula for each optimization variable in Ω
|
Solution for SSelecting all the optimization terms in
|
model 20 that are related to S the optimization model
|
forSis obtained as
|
S arg min
|
Sµ2
|
S
|
β
|
2
|
SgˆSΛ
|
2
|
F
|
D
|
Y1SgˆSΛE
|
arg min
|
Sβ
|
2
|
S
|
gˆSΛ1
|
βY1
|
2
|
Fµ2
|
S
|
21
|
We use the method in 26 to obtain the closedform solu
|
tion We first define the softthresholding function Sτσ signσ max σ τ0 Then the closedform solution S
|
can be given by
|
SUSΘµ2
|
βΣVT
|
UΣV SVD
|
gˆSΛ1
|
βY1
|
22
|
where Θis the weight set for different singular values The
|
larger the singular value tends to be the more significant
|
and it should correspond to a smaller weight The weight Θ
|
in 26 is set as
|
Θjξ
|
σjX γ 23
|
where σjXis the singular value of Xξis a positive num
|
ber and γ 1e6 Here we use the relative magnitude of
|
the singular values to adjust the weight setting ie
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.