text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
Prompt Generating Indicator States
|
In point AnswerAlgorithm Correctness you mentioned above each review mentions some
|
reason for a positive or negative opinion on that point Clus ter the reasons in point An
|
swerAlgorithm Correctness into similar meanings
|
Response 1 Correctness of Answers
|
R1 P The answers are all correct
|
R2 P The answers are all correct
|
R3 P The answers are all correct
|
R4 P The answers are correct
|
R6 P The answers are perfectly correct
|
R7 P Part A is correct
|
R8 P The answers are all correct
|
2 Presentation of Answers
|
R1 P The answers are clearly presented
|
R2 P The answers are clearly presented
|
R3 P The answers are clearly presented though there is a t ypo in part 1
|
R8 P The answers are clearly presented
|
3 Incorrect Answers or Misinterpretation of Questions
|
R5 N For part 1 According to the rubric you get 0 by claimi ng an incorrect result
|
as correct and give a proof for it The claim proved in part 2 is not what the problem
|
asks However it is correct and is some merit in the steps tha t close to the correct
|
problem
|
26Prompt Revise summarization
|
In the cluster of detailed reasons you summarized above are there repeated reasons that have
|
similar meanings Revise your answer and combine repeated reasons if any
|
Response 1 Correct and Clear Presentation of Answers
|
R1 P The answers are all correct and clearly presented
|
R2 P The answers are all correct and clearly presented
|
R3 P The answers are all correct and clearly presented th ough there is a typo in part
|
1
|
R4 P The answers are correct
|
R6 P The answers are perfectly correct
|
R7 P Part A is correct
|
R8 P The answers are all correct and clearly presented
|
2 Incorrect Answers or Misinterpretation of Questions
|
R5 N For part 1 According to the rubric you get 0 by claimi ng an incorrect result
|
as correct and give a proof for it The claim proved in part 2 is not what the problem
|
asks However it is correct and is some merit in the steps tha t close to the correct
|
problem
|
Next we parse peer review into reports on indicator states We first ask GPT to summarize
|
a peer review Then for each topic we ask GPT to match each pee r review with the indicator
|
states Note that for each matching task we append the same s ummarization history from all the
|
instructor reviews and one particular peer review without g enerating new histories
|
Prompt Summarizing peer review
|
Here is a student review on the same submission as R2 Summari ze the following student
|
review into pros and cons
|
Review
|
AnswerAlgorithm
|
Answers for both questions are correct and use proper proofs from the course
|
ProofAnalysis
|
Proof and analysis for both questions are correct with prope r runtime analysis and notations
|
Clarity
|
Maybe a little bit too much notations used on part b but still c orrect overall
|
Response Pros
|
Answers for both questions are correct and use proper proofs from the course
|
Proof and analysis for both questions are correct with prope r runtime analysis and
|
notations
|
Cons
|
27There might be a bit too much notation used in part b but its s till correct overall
|
Prompt Matching indicator states in each topic
|
For the reasons in rubric point AnswerAlgorithm Correc tness does the student have the
|
same reason as R2 If they both mention that reason or both do not mention this reason
|
they have the same reason If R2 mentions but the student does not mention they have
|
different reasons Separate each reason point with a line For each reason point start with
|
reasoning first then conclude your answer with Y for same or N for different Your output
|
format should be the following
|
1 Correct and Clear Presentation of Answers some reasonin g Y or N
|
2 Incorrect Answers or Misinterpretation of Questions so me reasoning Y or N
|
Response 1 Correct and Clear Presentation of Answers Both R2 and the student mention
|
that the answers are correct and clearly presented Y
|
2 Incorrect Answers or Misinterpretation of Questions R2 does not mention any incorrect
|
answers or misinterpretation of questions and neither doe s the student Y
|
Prompt for other topic
|
B2 Prompts in Direct GPT Query
|
When directly querying GPT we first provide the peer review then the instructor review and
|
finally a scoring rubric
|
Prompt Your task is to compare a students review of a homework submi ssion to the instructors
|
review of the same homework submission Here is the student s review
|
Answer The answer is not provided
|
Argument The answer is not provided
|
Clarity You wrote Note that for any b b Prmax jnotIbj bPrmax jnotIbj b
|
and I do not understand why this is true I dont know if y ou meant Note that IF
|
That part is very confusing Everything else is clear enough
|
Here is the instructors review
|
Answer See Argument
|
Argument Proof is incomplete Parts of the proof that are gi ven are not clearly correct
|
Clarity You should state that your proof is incomplete at th e beginning
|
Your output should be a score for the students review The ra nge of score is 0 to 10 The
|
rubric for scoring is
|
0 for a totally wrong or meaningless review
|
2 for a wrong review but you see the student made some effort in w riting the review
|
284 for mostly wrong but some points are correct
|
6 for mostly correct but some points are wrong
|
8 for almost the same as the instructors review
|
10 for an extraodinarily good review even better than the in structors
|
Start with reasoning first then conclude your response with a single line of a score between
|
0 and 10
|
29JOURNAL OF L ATEX CLASS FILES VOL 14 NO 8 AUGUST 2021 1
|
A Survey on Large Language Models from General
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.