text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
Transitioning from general LLMs to a medical LLMs in
|
volves three stages of continued training continued pretrain
|
ing instruction finetuning and human alignment However
|
given that the general LLM has completed training and pos
|
sesses some medical knowledge alongside its general knowl
|
edge all three phases may not be necessary to train a medical
|
LLM based on the general LLM Tab II presents information
|
about the medical LLMs including number of parametersbase model and training stages employed Medical LLMs
|
learn different capabilities at various training stages and
|
have diverse demands on computational resources and dataset
|
scales We categorize the training process into four paradigms
|
based on the combination of training stages as depicted in
|
Fig 3 The characteristics and strategies of each paradigm are
|
described in detail below
|
A IFT
|
Instruction finetuning also termed supervised finetuning
|
refers to parameter finetuning of pretrained LLMs using
|
instruction data QA pairs During the training process only
|
the loss of response content is considered After instruction
|
finetuning medical LLMs can demonstrate strong medical
|
instruction following and zeroshot learning ability It can
|
effectively grasp instructions from medical practitioners or
|
patients thereby enhancing doctors clinical efficiency and
|
addressing patients needs efficiently
|
Medical LLMs depicted in Tab II all employ instruction
|
finetuning to enhance their capacity for addressing medical
|
issues This is because the general LLMs inherently possess
|
extensive knowledge and thus models only require instruc
|
tion finetuning to adapt to medical directives Additionally
|
the emergence of Parameter Efficient FineTuning PEFT
|
accelerates the training process of instruction finetuning and
|
reduces the demand for computational resources Strengths
|
Instruction finetuning IFT can improve large medical lan
|
guage models performance in instruction following adherence
|
with minimal computational resources and time consumption
|
Weaknesses Without continued pretraining and human align
|
ment the knowledge understanding of the model may be
|
limited and the response of the model may not accurately
|
simulate the characteristics of a physician
|
1 Parameter Efficient FineTuning As can be seen from
|
Tab II there are two types of instruction finetuning methods
|
used in medical LLMs one is full parameter finetuning and
|
the other is Parameter Efficient FineTuning PEFT 114
|
Full parameter finetuning involves training and updating all
|
parameters related to the medical LLM during instruction fine
|
tuning Conversely PEFT reduces the number of model pa
|
rameters requiring training thereby reducing the performance
|
demands of the necessary equipment for training while en
|
suring that the finetuned models performance is comparable
|
to that of full parameter finetuning The most commonly
|
used parameterefficient finetuning method in the medical
|
LLMs is LowRank Adaptation LoRA 115 LoRA approx
|
imates parameter updates for each layer by adding lowrank
|
decomposition matrices while freezing the original weights
|
thereby reducing the number of training parameters and the
|
training time Another commonly used method is QLoRA
|
116 which is a parameter quantization technique based on
|
the LoRA method In QLoRA the original model parameters
|
are quantized to 4bit while the newly added lowrank de
|
composition matrix parameters are saved as 16bit for training
|
This approach further reduces the performance requirements of
|
the training equipment and lowers the threshold for developing
|
medical LLMs in medical institutions In addition there areJOURNAL OF L ATEX CLASS FILES VOL 14 NO 8 AUGUST 2021 11
|
TABLE II
|
DETAILED INFORMATION OF MEDICAL LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS NOTE P ARADENOTES PARAMETERS CP DENOTES CONTINUED
|
PRETRAINING IFT DENOTES INSTRUCTION FINE TUNING AND HA DENOTES HUMAN ALIGNMENT
|
Models Backbone Para B CP IFT IFT Methods HAPreferred
|
LanguagesOpen
|
SourcesData
|
MedPaLM 24 PaLM 98 540 Prompt Tuning EN 012023
|
ChatDoctor 25 LLaMA 99 7 Full Para EN 032023
|
DoctorGLM 26 ChatGLM 100 6 LoRA CN 042023
|
BenTsao 27 LLaMA 99 7 LoRA CN 042023
|
ChatGLMMed 28 ChatGLM 100 6 LoRA CN 042023
|
MedAlpaca 29 LLaMA 99 7 13 Full Para LoRA CN 042023
|
PMCLLaMA 30 LLaMA2 101 13 Full Para CN 042023
|
HuatuoGPT 8Baichuan 102
|
ZiyaLLaMA 1037 13 Full Para CN 052023
|
ChatMedConsult
|
31LLaMA 99 7 LoRA CN 052023
|
MedPaLM 2 32 PaLM2 104 EN 052023
|
Clinical Camel 33 LLaMA2 101 13 70 QLoRA EN 052023
|
ShenNongTCM 34 LLaMA 99 7 LoRA CN 062023
|
MedicalGPT 35ZiyaLLaMA 103
|
BaichuanChat 10213 LoRA EN CN 062023
|
ClinicalGPT 36 BLOOM 105 7 LoRA CN 062023
|
DISCMedLLM 37 Baichuan 102 13 Full Para CN 082023
|
Zhongjing 38 ZiyaLLaMA 103 13 LoRA CN 082023
|
BianQue 39 ChatGLM 100 6 Full Para CN 102023
|
Alpacare 40 LLaMA 99 7 13 Full Para EN 102023
|
QilinMed 41 Baichuan 102 7 LoRA CN 102023
|
Taiyi 42 Qwen 106 7 QLoRA ENCN 112023
|
ChiMedGPT 43 ZiyaLLaMA 103 13 Full Para CN 112023
|
MediTron 44 LLaMA2 101 7 70 Full Para EN 112023
|
HuatuoGPTII 45Baichuan2 102
|
Yi 1077 13 34 Full Para CN 122023
|
AntGLMMed 46 GLM 108 10 Full Para LoRA
|
CpolyEN CN 122023
|
GPTdoctor 47 Baichuan2Chat 102 13 LoRA CN 122023
|
BioMistral 48 MistralInstruct 109 7 QLoRA Multilingual 022024
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.