text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
|---|
j0ΞjwjσNwN With this we define RPI set Xf
|
for control law 26 in the following lemma
|
Lemma 2 The set XfαZf FNΦe with α0
|
is an RPI set for system xN1AxNBκfxN ηN
|
with control law κfdefined in 26andηN FNΞ
|
if the following two conditions hold
|
aαABKfZfΓW αZfwithZfRPI accord
|
ing to Definition 4 and Γ AΦe
|
N0BΦν
|
N0 Ξ0
|
bΦe
|
Nj1AΦe
|
NjBΦν
|
Nj Ξjj 1 N1
|
It holds that if xN XfxN1 XfηN FNΞ
|
4Note that iNis not included in 7 hence we need to
|
define this case separately
|
6PROOF We start by analyzing the dynamics under
|
control law 26 ie
|
xN1 ABKfzNAeNBνNηN
|
Next we insert the definitions of eN νN and ηNto get
|
AeNBνNηNN1X
|
j0AΦe
|
NjBΦν
|
NjΞj wjσNwN
|
AΦe
|
N0BΦν
|
N0 Ξ0 w0
|
N1X
|
j1AΦe
|
NjBΦν
|
NjΞj wjσNwN
|
Using Φe
|
NN1 Σ NN1σNIndue to 15 Γ
|
AΦe
|
N0BΦν
|
N0 Ξ0from a and b we obtain
|
AeNBνNηN Γ w0N1X
|
j1Φe
|
Nj1wj Φe
|
NN1wN
|
Γ w0N1X
|
j0Φe
|
Njwj1
|
Therefore the dynamics under control law 26 are
|
xN1 ABKfzN Γ w0 z
|
zN1N1X
|
j0Φe
|
Njwj1
|
z
|
eN1
|
Now if xNzNeNαZf F NΦe Xf then
|
zN1αZfis guaranteed by a and eN1 FNΦe
|
holds by construction Therefore xN1 Xf2
|
Intuitively a in Lemma 2 ensures that αZfis RPI
|
with respect to control law Kfand optimized distur
|
bance Γ w while b constrains the error states to the
|
same tube FNΦe after Ntimesteps which is less re
|
strictive but similar to the FIR constraint in 10 To
|
useXfas the terminal set in the proposed MPC Xf
|
needs to satisfy the state constraints ie Xf X and
|
control law 26 needs to satisfy the input constraints
|
ieκfx U for all x Xf This can be enforced by
|
αZf X F NΦe 28
|
αKfZf U F NΦν 29
|
where 28 follows from XfαZf FNΦe and 29
|
follows from
|
κfxN KfzNz
|
αZfNX
|
j0Φν
|
NjwNj
|
z
|
FNΦν UNote that constraints 28 29 and a in Lemma 2
|
are the same constraints as those used in 28 to scale
|
the terminal set The main idea is that the online scal
|
ing preserves invariance since we simultaneously opti
|
mize the scaling of the set αand the disturbance Γ wfor
|
which the set is RPI Therefore we can use the results
|
in 28 to linearly embed these constraints into the MPC
|
formulation as shown in Appendix A1
|
Finally we reformulate the inclusion of the terminal dis
|
turbance 27 similar to Section 3 We enforce inclu
|
sion 27 on the combined disturbance 6 with
|
d
|
Ad
|
BKfz
|
d
|
KfzN N1M
|
j0
|
d
|
AΦe
|
Njd
|
BΦν
|
NjW W
|
N1M
|
j0ΞjW σNWFNΞ d 1 nD30
|
Using the terminal constraint zNαZfand Lemma 1
|
we get
|
αd
|
KfZfN1M
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.