text
stringlengths 4
2.78M
| meta
dict |
|---|---|
---
abstract: 'We present a high-resolution set of adiabatic binary galaxy cluster merger simulations using FLASH. These are the highest-resolution simulations to date of such mergers using an AMR grid-based code with Eulerian hydrodynamics. In this first paper in a series we investigate the effects of merging on the entropy of the hot intracluster gas, specifically with regard to the ability of merging to heat and disrupt cluster “cool-cores.” We find, in line with recent works, that the effect of fluid instabilities that are well-resolved in grid-based codes is to significantly mix the gases of the two clusters and to significantly increase the entropy of the gas of the final merger remnant. This result is characteristic of mergers over a range of initial mass ratio and impact parameter. In line with this, we find that the kinetic energy associated with random motions is higher in our merger remnants which have high entropy floors, indicating the motions have efficiently mixed the gas and heated the cluster core with gas of initially high entropy. We examine the implications of this result for the maintenance of high entropy floors in the centers of galaxy clusters and the derivation of the properties of dark matter from the thermal properties of the X-ray emitting gas.'
author:
- 'J. A. ZuHone'
title: 'A Parameter Space Exploration of Galaxy Cluster Mergers I: Gas Mixing and the Generation of Cluster Entropy'
---
Introduction {#sec:intro}
============
The growth of structure in the universe is thought to proceed in a bottom-up fashion, with smaller structures merging into larger structures [e.g., @whi93]. The largest structures that have formed to date via this process are clusters of galaxies. Clusters of galaxies are important astrophysical objects, both in their own right and for their use as cosmological probes. Galaxy clusters contain a good representation of the different forms and kinds of matter within the universe. The bulk of the mass in clusters of galaxies is comprised of dark matter [@zwy37; @bah77], which is believed to be largely collisionless. The bulk of the baryonic material in clusters of galaxies is comprised of a hot diffuse plasma called the intracluster medium (ICM) [e.g., @sar88]. The remaining (and smallest) component of mass is that of the galaxies themselves. Galaxy clusters provide an opportunity to witness the interplay between these different kinds and forms of matter in close quarters. Additionally, clusters have become very useful as probes of cosmology. The number density of clusters of a given mass at a given redshift is a sensitive function of the parameters of the standard big bang cosmological model. Accurate measurements of the density and temperature structure of galaxy clusters enable determination of cluster masses (under the assumptions of spherical symmetry and hydrostatic equilibrium) which in turn helps to constrain the values of cosmological parameters [@kita96; @voit05].
Extensive study of both of these aspects of astrophysics with galaxy clusters requires state-of-the-art observations and simulations. The latest generation of X-ray telescopes ([*Chandra*]{}, [*XMM-Newton*]{}) has provided high-resolution observations of the ICM that have made it possible to probe sensitively the density, temperature, and metallicity structure of the gas. These observations have made possible the discovery of a myriad of features in the ICM such as shocks, cold fronts, and bubbles, to name a few. In addition, such precise measurements have made hydrostatic estimates of cluster masses a useful tool for constraining cosmological parameters on a par with other methods [@vik09b]. In tandem with these advances in observation, astrophysical simulation codes have taken advantage of large-scale computing resources and innovative algorithms to model clusters of galaxies with unprecedented resolution and with the ability to include detailed models of the relevant physical processes occurring in clusters.
One of the most fundamental of these physical processes that shapes the life of clusters is merging. The merging process is responsible for forming the clusters and greatly influences the state of the matter within a cluster throughout its lifetime. Mergers drive shocks into the intracluster medium, heating and compressing the gas and driving turbulent motions. As a result of merging the kinetic properties of the dark matter are also significantly altered. Mergers also drive galaxy activity, producing new bursts of star formation as the gas is compressed, or in some cases possibly inhibiting it [@fuj99; @bek03]. Many observed clusters of galaxies show signs of current or recent merging. Two prominent examples of recent note are 1E 0657-56 (the “Bullet Cluster”) [@mar02; @clo06], and Abell 520 [@mar05; @mah07]. Explaining the myriad of observable consequences of mergers using simulations is an active area of research.
From the perspective of simulations, there are two ways to study the merging process. The first is by studying mergers that occur in the context of a cosmological simulation, “out in the wild.” The advantage of this approach is that it captures as accurately as possible the merging process as it occurs in the real universe, with many mergers of many different mass ratios and impact parameters going on at the same time, in the context of the overall cosmological expansion. The second computational approach to studying mergers is by focusing on particular merger scenarios in isolation via simulations of idealized cluster mergers. These simulations involve the setup of two or more idealized, spherically symmetric clusters in a localized setting and with an initial orbital trajectory. Though this method is useful for studying individual actual mergers as seen in observations [e.g. @tak06; @spr07; @aka08; @mas08; @ran08; @zuh09a; @zuh09b], an additional application has been to explore a space over parameters such as the mass ratio and initial impact parameter of the progenitor clusters or by varying the physics of the cluster ICM or dark matter.
Several previous investigations of merger parameter spaces [e.g. @roe97; @ric01; @gom02; @rit02; @mcc07; @poo06; @poo07; @poo08; @tak10] have emphasized the effects of merging on cluster morphology, the thermodynamics of the gas, and observables. We build on this work with a new set of simulations. The set of simulations presented here is the highest-resolution parameter study of idealized binary cluster mergers performed with an AMR-based PPM code to date, with a resolution 3-4 times higher than the most recent investigation [@ric01] based on such a formalism.
In this first of two papers, we use these simulations to examine the effect of merging on the entropy of the cluster gas. Observational surveys of clusters have shown that although in nearly all clusters the entropy (defined here as $S \equiv k_BTn_e^{-2/3}$) follows a power-law profile with radius, the central core entropies of clusters vary [@llo00; @pon03; @voit05c; @fal07; @mor07; @cav09; @pra09]. These observed entropy profiles are well-fit by an entropy profile of the form $$S(r) = S_0 + S_1{\left(r \over {0.1r_{200}}\right)}^\alpha
\label{eqn:entropy}$$ Where $S_0$ is the value for the core entropy and $\alpha \sim 1.0-1.3$. In particular, @cav09 and @pra09 showed that clusters exhibit a bimodal distribution of central core entropies. @cav09 found a low-entropy peak at $S_0 \sim 15~{\rm keV~cm}^2$, a high-entropy peak at $S_0 \sim 150~{\rm keV~cm}^2$, and very few clusters with core entropies $S_0 \sim 30-50~{\rm keV~cm}^2$. Similarly, @pra09 found peaks at $S_0 \sim 3$ and $S_0 \sim 75~{\rm keV~cm}^2$. These core entropies are higher than what would be expected from a simple “cooling flow” scenario [e.g. @fab77; @fab94], where the core gas is allowed to cool and compress unabated until it turns into stars or molecular clouds. High-resolution [*XMM-Newton*]{} spectroscopy [@pet01; @pet03] and [*Chandra*]{} spectral imaging [@dav01] have shown that there is indeed little gas below $T\simeq 1$ keV in the cores of clusters with some of the highest cooling rates.
Since cooling via X-ray radiation is directly observed, but the expected central entropies from unabated cooling is not, clusters with high entropy floors require a heating mechanism. Proposed candidates for heating of cluster cores include magnetic field reconnection [@sok90], thermal conduction due to electron collisions (e.g., Narayan & Medvedev 2001; Fabian, Voigt, & Morris 2002; Zakamska & Narayan 2003) and turbulent conduction (e.g., Cho et al. 2003; Voigt & Fabian 2004), and heating by cosmic rays (e.g., Inoue & Sasaki 2001, Colafrancesco & Marchegiani 2008); a recent review can be found in @petersonfabian06. The currently favored mechanism is heating by the central AGN (e.g., Böhringer et al. 1993; Binney & Tabor 1995; McNamara et al. 2001, 2005; Fabian et al. 2006; Forman et al. 2007; for a recent review see McNamara & Nulsen 2007). The AGN explosions blow the bubbles in the ICM and inject energy into the ICM in the form of relativistic particles as well as mechanical energy. However, the precise mechanism by which this energy heats the central ICM is still unclear. A fine balance between AGN explosions and cooling is required to avoid the complete blow-up of the cool cores, which gave rise to “feedback” models, where the cooling flow itself feeds the AGN.
Thermal conduction is another particularly attractive idea, because it taps the vast reservoir of thermal energy in the gas just outside the cool core, while automatically ensuring that the core will not be overheated, since the heat influx decreases with diminishing temperature gradient. The classic plasma conductivity via Coulomb collisions was shown to be insufficient even at its full Spitzer value (e.g., Zakamska & Narayan 2003). It has a strong temperature dependence and decreases right where it is most needed, and tangled magnetic fields should further suppress it (as was indeed observed outside the cool cores, Markevitch et al. 2003a). Additionally, magnetohydrodynamic instabilities such as the heat-flux-driven buoyancy instability (HBI) may suppress heat conduction to cluster cores from the cluster outskirts altogether by aligning magnetic field lines perpendicular to the radial temperature gradients in clusters [@qua08; @par08; @bog09; @par09], though recent works have shown that modest amounts of turbulence in cluster cores may work to keep the fields randomized and sustain some conduction of heat to the cluster core [@rus10; @par10]. Though the effects of AGN and conduction may account for the lack of systems with extremely low central cooling times and entropies, it is also unclear whether or not either effect can explain the highest entropy floors seen in some clusters, which can reach central entropy values of $S_0 \sim 100$ or higher.
Previous investigations of cluster mergers [e.g., @rit02; @mcc07; @poo08] have indicated that so-called cluster “cool cores” (characterized by temperature inversions, high gas densities, and low central entropies and cooling times) are largely resilient to the heating that occurs as a result of merging. The central entropies and cooling times increase for a short time after the core passage, but the heating is not enough to offset cooling, which quickly reestablishes a cool core within a few Gyr [@poo08]. @mcc07, in a suite of adiabatic idealized merger simulations, determined that the ICM is heated in two major stages: the first is when the shocks are generated at the initial core passage and the second is at a later stage when material is shock-heated as it recollapses onto the merger remnant. Though the overall entropy of the merger remnant was increased with respect to the progenitor systems consistent with the self-similar prediction, the power-law behavior of the entropy profile was maintained all the way down into the central core (see Figure 5 of that paper). It is notable that these SPH merger simulations also resulted in little mixing of the cluster gases, since such mixing could provide a source of heating to cluster cores if the gases are of very different entropies.
It is known that the various methods for solving the equations of hydrodynamics result in different degrees of mixing. While previous investigations of mixing due to merging [e.g., @rit02; @poo08] have employed the Lagrangian “smoothed-particle hydrodynamics” (SPH) formulation for solving the Euler equations, our simulations have been performed using an Eulerian PPM formulation. The two different approaches to hydrodynamics differ in their ability to appropriately model turbulence and the onset of fluid instabilities [see, e.g. @dol05; @age07; @wad08]. The amount of mixing of the gas is also dependent on the precise nature of the physics of the ICM, as the presence of magnetic fields, turbulence, and dissipative processes will affect the mixing of the gas. The extent to which the ICM mixes as a result of mergers and its effect on the thermodynamic properties of the cluster gas is therefore dependent the physical processes operating in the ICM as well as the chosen algorithm for solving the hydrodynamic equations. Therefore, it is important as a baseline to characterize the mixing process and the effects of such mixing on the thermodynamics of the cluster gas in the simplest model for ICM, that of an inviscid, unmagnetized gas, in the context of an Eulerian, PPM-based hydrodynamics code. Doing so is the goal of this paper.
This paper is organized as follows. In Section \[sec:sims\] we describe the simulation method, setup, and rationale for the initial conditions. In Section \[sec:results\] we present the results of the simulations, focusing on the degree of mixing of the intracluster gas components and the alteration of the thermodynamic state of the cluster gas as a result. In Section \[sec:disc\] we discuss the implications of these results for different approaches to hydrodynamics for galaxy cluster simulations, the survival of cool cores in cluster mergers, and the use of X-ray observables to determine properties of the dark matter. In Section \[sec:conc\] we summarize this work and suggest avenues for future investigations. Throughout this paper we assume a spatially flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmology with $h = 0.7$, $\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.3$, and $\Omega_b = 0.02h^{-2}$.
Simulations {#sec:sims}
===========
Method {#sec:method}
------
We performed our simulations using FLASH, a parallel hydrodynamics/$N$-body astrophysical simulation code developed at the Center for Astrophysical Thermonuclear Flashes at the University of Chicago [@fry00]. FLASH uses adaptive mesh refinement (AMR), a technique that places higher resolution elements of the grid only where they are needed. In our case we are interested in capturing sharp ICM features like shocks and “cold fronts” accurately, as well as resolving the inner cores of the cluster dark matter halos. As such it is particularly important to be able to resolve the grid adequately in these regions. AMR allows us to do so without needing to have the whole grid at the same resolution. FLASH solves the Euler equations of hydrodynamics using the Piecewise-Parabolic Method (PPM) of @col84, which is ideally suited for capturing shocks. FLASH also includes an $N$-body module which uses the particle-mesh method to solve for the forces on gravitating particles. The gravitational potential is computed using a multigrid solver included with FLASH [@ric08].
tab1.tex
tab2.tex
Initial Conditions {#sec:ICs}
------------------
For these idealized cluster merger simulations, we choose initial conditions based on information gleaned from cosmological simulations and cluster observations. Since we are interested in the effects of merging on relaxed systems, our initial clusters are configured to be systems consistent with observed relaxed clusters and cluster scaling relations. For the temperature normalization, we choose clusters that lie along the $M_{500}-T_X$ relation of @vik09a, which is $$M_{500} = M_0E(z)^{-1}(T_X/5~{\rm keV})^\alpha$$ with $M_0 = 3.02 \times 10^{14} h^{-1} M_\odot$ and $\alpha = 1.53$. The dependence on the redshift $z$ is encapsulated in the function $E(z) \equiv H(z)/H_0$. For the total gas mass within $r_{500}$, we use the relation [also from @vik09a] $$f_g (h/0.72)^{1.5} = 0.125 + 0.037~{\rm log_{10}} M_{15}$$ where $M_{15}$ is the cluster total mass, $M_{500}$, in units of $10^{15} h^{-1} M_\odot$.
For our grid of simulations we have chosen a set of masses representative of galaxy clusters and groups. The chosen masses are given in terms of $M_{200}$, corresponding to the mass within which the average density is $200\rho_{\rm crit}(z)$. The mass $M_{200}$ is related to the radius $r_{200}$ via $$M_{200} = {4\pi \over 3}{[200\rho_{\rm crit}(z)]}r_{200}^3$$ $M_{200}$ is calculated from $M_{500}$ from the assumed value of $c_{200}$ and the assumed form of the density profile.
For the total mass distribution (gas and dark matter) we choose an NFW [@NFW97] profile: $$\rho_{\rm tot}(r) = {\rho_s \over {r/r_s{(1+r/r_s)}^2}}.$$ Where the scale density $\rho_s$ and scale radius $r_s$ are determined by the following constraints: $$\begin{aligned}
r_s &=& \frac{r_{200}}{c_{200}} \\
\rho_s &=& \frac{200}{3}c_{200}^3\rho_{\rm crit}(z){\left[{\rm log}(1+r/r_s) - {r/r_s \over {1 + r/r_s}}\right]}^{-1}\end{aligned}$$ The NFW functional form is carried out to $r_{200}$. For radii $r > r_{200}$ the mass density follows an exponential profile: $$\rho_{\rm tot}(r) = {\rho_{\rm s} \over {c_{200}(1+c_{200})^2}}{\left({r \over r_{200}}\right)^\kappa}{\rm exp}{\left(-{r-r_{200} \over r_{\rm decay}}\right)}$$ where $\kappa$ is set such that the density and its first derivative are continuous at $r = r_{200}$ and $r_{\rm decay} = 0.1r_{200}$.
The total mass distribution uniquely determines the gravitational potential, and via the constraint of hydrostatic equilibrium of the gas within this potential, the pressure profile is uniquely determined. To determine the physical quantities of density and temperature, more information is needed. Since we are here interested in the effect of mergers on the entropy profile of clusters, we make use of Equation \[eqn:entropy\] to set the gas properties in our initial systems. We start off with small core entropies ($S_0$, see Table \[tab:ICs\]) in order to make our models consistent with relaxed, “cool-core” galaxy clusters, and set $\alpha = 1.1$. With this information in hand, we write the condition for hydrostatic equilibrium as follows: $$\begin{aligned}
{dP \over dr} &=& -\rho_g{d\Phi \over dr} \\
{k_B \over {\mu}m_p}{d({\rho_g}T) \over dr} &=& -\rho_g{d\Phi \over dr} \\
{k_B \over {\mu}m_p}{d \over dr}\left[{T{\left(T \over S\right)}^{3/2}}\right] &=& -\left({T \over S}\right)^{3/2}{d\Phi \over dr}\end{aligned}$$ Following other authors [@poo06], we solve this differential equation by imposing $T(r_{200}) = \frac{1}{2}T_{200}$, where $$k_BT_{200} \equiv {GM_{200}{\mu}m_p \over 2r_{200}}$$ is the so-called “virial temperature” of the cluster. With the temperature profile in hand we may use it and the entropy to determine the gas density profile, and so also determine the dark matter density profile via $\rho_{\rm DM} = \rho_{\rm tot} - \rho_g$.
After the radial profiles are determined it remains to set up the distribution of positions and velocities for the dark matter particles. Here we follow the procedure outlined in @kaz06. For the particle positions a random deviate $u$ is uniformly sampled in the range \[0,1\] and the function $u = M_{\rm DM}(r)/M_{\rm DM}(r_{\rm max})$ is inverted to give the radius of the particle from the center of the halo. For the particle velocities, the procedure is less trivial. Many previous investigations have made use of the “local Maxwellian approximation.” In this procedure at a given radius the particle velocity is drawn from a Maxwellian distribution with dispersion $\sigma^2(r)$, where the latter quantity has been derived from solving the Jeans equation [@bin87]. It has been shown that this approach is not sufficient to accurately represent the velocity distribution functions of dark matter halos with a central cusp such as the NFW profile [@kaz04]. To accurately realize particle velocities, we choose to directly calculate the distribution function via the Eddington formula [@edd16]: $$\F(\E) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{8}\pi^2}\left[\int^\E_0{d^2\rho \over d\Psi^2}{d\Psi \over \sqrt{\E - \Psi}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{\E}}\left({d\rho \over d\Psi}\right)_{\Psi=0} \right]$$ where $\Psi = -\Phi$ is the relative potential and $\E = \Psi - \frac{1}{2}v^2$ is the relative energy of the particle. We tabulate the function $\F$ in intervals of $\E$ interpolate to solve for the distribution function at a given energy. Particle speeds are chosen from this distribution function using the acceptance-rejection method. Once particle radii and speeds are determined, positions and velocities are determined by choosing random unit vectors in $\Re^3$. The simulation parameters for each simulated cluster are given in Table \[tab:ICs\].
For all of the simulations, we set up the two clusters within a cubical computational domain of width $L = 10h^{-1}$ Mpc on a side. The distance between the cluster centers is given by the sum of their respective $r_{200}$. @vit02 demonstrated from cosmological simulations that the average infall velocity for merging clusters is $v_{\rm in}(r_{\rm vir}) = 1.1V_c$, where $V_c = \sqrt{GM_{\rm vir}/r_{\rm vir}}$ is the circular velocity at the virial radius $r_{\rm vir}$ for the primary cluster. For all of our simulations, this is chosen as the initial relative velocity ($v_{\rm in} \approx 1200$ km/s). The clusters are initialized in the $x-y$ coordinate plane at $z$ = 0.
For this investigation we explore a parameter space in mass ratio of the clusters $R$ and in initial impact parameter $b$. The set of simulations in this parameter space is detailed in Table \[tab:SimGrid\]. Taking the virial mass of our primary system as $M_{200} = 6 \times 10^{14} M_\odot$, we perform mergers involving virial mass ratios of $R$ = 1:1, 1:3, and 1:10. We also vary the impact parameter $b$ for our runs. @vit02 also demonstrated that for merger encounters the average tangential velocity is $v_\perp \simeq 0.4V_C$. Instead of splitting our initial velocity into radial and tangential components, we choose to initialize our systems with impact parameters that result in relative tangential velocities consistent with the results of @vit02. Since the velocity $v_\perp$ represents an average velocity, we select a range of tangential velocities consistent with this relation. Figure \[fig:schematic\] shows the initial merger geometry and how the tangential and radial components of the velocity are related to the initial choice of impact parameter. Finally, for each merger, we detail the angular momentum parameter $\lambda$ = $J|E|^{1/2}/GM^{5/2}$ [@pee69] as a measure of the angular momentum of each simulation in Table \[tab:SimGrid\].
The highest AMR resolution of this set of simulations is ${\Delta}x$ = 5$h^{-1}$ kpc, which is $\sim$3-4 times higher than the resolution in @ric01. The number of dark matter particles in each simulation is given in Table \[tab:ICs\].
Since we will be concerned mainly with the effects of binary merging on cluster cores, it is important to ensure that the dramatic changes that will be seen to occur in the simulations are the result of merging and not evolution of the isolated primary cluster initial conditions. To this end we have run a single-cluster test, evolving the primary cluster in isolation for the same 10 Gyr as our merger simulations. Figure \[fig:stability\] shows the radial profiles of gas density, gas temperature, dark matter density, and gas entropy at the two epochs $t$ = 0.0 Gyr and $t$ = 10.0 Gyr. There is some moderate evolution in the profiles, particularly in the innermost few zones of the cluster core and in the cluster outskirts. The former is a consequence of force smoothing, (a known numerical effect due to the inability to resolve the gravitational force on scales smaller than the grid resolution). It is important to note that though there is some increase in the central entropy due to this effect, this increase is insignificant when compared to the increase that results from the mergers, as will be seen below. The evolution in the cluster outskirts is a consequence of the tapering off of the cluster profiles beyond $r_{200}$, but has a very small effect on the profiles only in these regions and does not affect the cluster core.
Results {#sec:results}
=======
Qualitative Description: Entropy Maps
-------------------------------------
Over the course of a galaxy cluster merger, entropy is generated via processes that dissipate kinetic energy into heat energy, such as shocks and turbulence, and processes that bring into contact gases of different entropies and mix them. Here we show maps of the ICM entropy throughout the merger to get a broader picture of the major entropy-generating events during cluster mergers. Each set of maps are taken from slices through the $z = 0$ coordinate plane, the plane of the cluster centers’ mutual orbit.
### Equal-Mass Mergers
For our equal-mass mergers, there is no distinction between the primary and the secondary system, so either cluster could be chosen as the primary without any loss of specificity (in all discussions that follow of the equal-mass mergers, it is assumed that the cluster whose center of mass has $x < 0$ is the primary). In the head-on case (simulation S1, Figure \[fig:entr\_S1\]), the cluster cores approach each other, driving equal and opposite shocks into the gas. As the dark matter cores pass each other, the shocked gas in between the clusters forms a flattened low-entropy “pancake”-like structure ($t \approx$ 1.6 Gyr). As the shocks depart, this gas expands and cools adiabatically for a time, but eventually falls back toward the center of the system. The gas at high radii perpendicular to the merger axis develops Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities and is quickly mixed in with the surrounding gas. Meanwhile, the central gas is dragged back and forth by the oscillating dark matter cores ($t \approx$ 3-4 Gyr). This process drives more shocks into the gas, heating it further. Eventually the gas forms a core with a roughly constant entropy of $S \sim $ 300 keV cm$^2$ with a radius of $r \sim$ 300 kpc.
The off-center equal-mass cases (simulations S2 and S3, Figures \[fig:entr\_S2\] and \[fig:entr\_S3\]) are very similar to each other. In these cases the gas cores do not collide at the first core passage but sideswipe, creating a bridge of stripped, low-entropy gas that stretches between the two dark matter cores ($t \approx$ 2 Gyr). The gas remaining in the cores is initially held back by ram pressure as it moves outward, but as it moves out to lower density regions the effect of this pressure is weakened and the gas “slingshots” through and out the other side of the potential well. This gas expands adiabatically, curving around the dark matter cores and cooling, forming two large plumes of gas. The heads of these plumes fall back along with the dark matter cores to the center of the system by $t \approx$ 3 Gyr and are heated. The plumes themselves are stable for a few Gyr but eventually (by $t \approx$ 4 Gyr) they have become mixed in with the surrounding gas due to the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. The central gas in these cases forms a roughly constant-entropy core of $S \sim$ 500 keV cm$^2$ with a radius of $r \sim$ 400 kpc.
### Unequal-Mass Mergers
The unequal mass mergers have a qualitatively different evolution, as a result of the asymmetry in mass, which results in the formation of similar but somewhat different structures. In the head-on, 1:3 mass-ratio case (simulation S4, Figure \[fig:entr\_S4\]), the denser, lower-entropy core of the secondary cluster punches through the less dense core of the primary ($t \approx$ 1.5 Gyr), disrupting it completely. As the secondary’s gas moves forward, a conical stream of low-entropy gas that has been stripped from the core trails it, falling into the gravitational potential well of the primary cluster ($t \approx$ 2.0 Gyr). As this gas falls in, the coherent structures are ripped apart by fluid instabilities and mixed in with the surrounding, higher-entropy ICM. At the same time, the secondary’s core, which had been initially trailing the dark matter core due to the ram pressure of the primary’s gas, now encounters regions of lower density. This causes the gas to fall back into the dark matter core, which then overshoots the potential minimum and begins to climb out of it on the other side, expanding and cooling adiabatically ($t \approx$ 2.0-3.0 Gyr). At this point, the secondary’s dark matter core has already begun to fall back towards the primary’s. By $t$ = 4.0 Gyr the gas remaining from the secondary’s core has formed a low-entropy, collimated stream that flows into the coalescing dark matter halos. By the end of the simulation at $t$ = 10.0 Gyr this gas has thoroughly mixed in with the higher-entropy gas of the primary and has formed a roughly constant entropy core with $S_0 \sim$ 450 keV cm$^2$.
In the off-center, unequal-mass cases (simulations S5 and S6, Figures \[fig:entr\_S5\] and \[fig:entr\_S6\]), a very different situation emerges. The secondary cluster does not disrupt the core of the primary cluster initially, but the gravitational disturbance caused by its passage sets up sloshing of the central core gas in the dark matter-dominated potential ($t \approx$ 2.0 Gyr). This is due to the fact that as both the dark matter and the gas are pulled toward the secondary cluster during the first core passage, the gas is held back by ram pressure and becomes displaced from the potential minimum. As the gas sloshes back into the potential minimum and then out again, it expands and cools, but as it comes into contact with higher entropy gas at larger radii it mixes with this gas and is heated. Meanwhile, the gas from the secondary cluster has formed a plume and stripped-gas bridge connecting back to the primary in much the same way as in the equal-mass cases. The bridge accretes cold gas back onto the primary cluster, followed by the plume which falls in which is mixed in with the sloshing central gas ($t \approx$ 4-6 Gyr). Throughout this time period the plume is relatively stable but is eventually broken up and mixed in with the surrounding gas.
In our most extreme mass ratio cases, the effect of the subcluster on the main cluster is smallest, but the results are qualitatively similar to the 1:3 mass ratio cases, with the associated core disruption and accreting stream in the head-on case (simulation S7, Figure \[fig:entr\_S7\]) and subcluster plumes and main core sloshing in the off-center cases (simulations S8 and S9, Figures \[fig:entr\_S8\] and \[fig:entr\_S9\]). However, in these cases the onset of the effects of instabilities on these features is much sooner after the merger than in the previous cases. The Kelvin-Helmholtz instability begins to break up the plumes and sloshing core cold fronts almost immediately following the core passage. This is because the gravitational support from the subcluster is considerably weaker, making it much easier to strip the gas and providing less gravitational support against the onset of instability.
ICM Mixing {#sec:mixing}
----------
{width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"}
In order to investigate the degree of mixing of the gas of our initial systems, we have made use of “mass scalars”. These quantities are defined as $Y_i = \rho_i/\rho$, where $\rho_i$ is the partial density, and are advected along with the fluid:
$${\partial({\rho}{Y_i}) \over {\partial}t} + \nabla \cdot ({\rho}{Y_i}{\bf v}) = 0$$
For the primary and secondary systems we define a mass scalar for each that is initially set equal to unity for radii within $r_{200}$. We then examine the degree of mixing of these two components at later times. To parameterize this mixing we follow @rit02 and define the degree of mixing as
$$M = 1 - \left|\frac{\rho_1-\rho_2}{\rho_1+\rho_2}\right|$$
Given the above definition for the mass scalars, this relation simply reduces to
$$\label{eq:mixing}
M = 1 - \left|\frac{Y_1-Y_2}{Y_1+Y_2}\right|$$
For example, a value of $M$ = 1.0 indicates equal amounts of the two cluster gas components in a cell ($Y_1/Y_2$ = 1), a value of $M$ = 0.5 indicates that the cluster gas is mixed in a ratio of $Y_1/Y_2 = 3$ or $Y_1/Y_2 = 1/3$, and a value of $M$ = 0.0 indicates the gas is not mixed at all, and that only the gas from one cluster is present.
Figure \[fig:mixing\_figure\] shows the resulting mixing $M$ with gas density contours overlaid at $t$ = 10 Gyr, in a slice though the $z = 0$ coordinate plane. Additionally, Figure \[fig:mix\_profile\] shows the mixing $M$ as a function of radius. For the equal mass mergers, the gas of the two clusters is well-mixed in all cases of varying impact parameter out to a radius of nearly $\sim$0.5 Mpc. In the head-on case (simulation S1), the gas is also significantly mixed along the plane perpendicular to the merger trajectory where the large “pancakes” of gas formed. The degree of mixing is more pronounced in the off-center cases (simulations S2 and S3). In these cases the fact that the cores slide pass each other and are stripped before finally merging into a single remnant allows for more mixing between the two than in the case where the collision is head-on. For the 1:3 and 1:10 mass ratio mergers, the gas is also mixed but it becomes less efficient as the impact parameter increases. In the head-on case with a 1:3 mass ratio (simulation S4), the disruption of the primary’s core by the secondary allows for significant mixing of the two cluster components. The result is very different for the off-center cases, however. In simulation S5 ($b$ = 464 kpc) in the center of the cluster the two components are only mixed in a 3-to-1 ratio and in simulation S6 ($b$ = 932 kpc) the central gas is hardly mixed with gas from the other cluster at all. Most of the mixing in these cases occurs at radii $r {\,\hbox{\lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}\llap{\raise0.6ex\hbox{$>$}}}\,}$ 500 kpc, as the stripping of the secondary’s gas occurred as it made its first core passage, and as this gas fell toward the center of the primary it was broken up by instabilities and mixed with the surrounding gas. Similarly, in the head-on case for the 1:10 mass ratio (simulation S7) the central gas is mixed in a 3-to-1 ratio, but in the off-center cases (simulations S8 and S9) the central gas is not mixed with gas from the other cluster at all. In these extreme cases, the low entropy core is not disrupted completely but only displaced from the center somewhat and as the system as a whole relaxes this material sinks back to the center of the newly-reconstituted potential well.
Figure \[fig:mixing\_movies\] shows snapshots of volume-rendered movies of gas mixing in our galaxy cluster merger simulations that can be found at http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/ jzuhone/Research/Entropy\
\_and\_Mixing.html.
Radial Profiles {#sec:profiles}
---------------
It is instructive to examine the final radial profiles of various quantities compared to the initial radial profiles for the same quantities of the primary cluster. Whereas our initial gas profiles represent typical cool-core clusters with peaked gas density profiles, a positive radial temperature gradient at low radii, and power-law entropy profiles almost all the way to the cluster center, the final profiles appear very different.
We have constructed these radial profiles by first taking the cluster potential minimum as the cluster center. By visual inspection we find that at the end of each simulation this position corresponds well with the location of the gas and dark matter density peaks. Secondly, we divide the cluster into spherical radial annuli of width $\Delta{r} = 10.5h^{-1}$ kpc, wide enough so that there are enough points/particles in each annulus to adequately sample each relevant quantity, but narrow enough to sample the radial range adequately. We have tested the robustness of our profiles by varying the width of our radial annuli by a factor of 2-3x, for which we find no significant changes in our profiles. The velocity mean and velocity dispersion are estimated from the sample mean and variance of the cells for the gas and the particles for the dark matter.
Figure \[fig:dens\_profile\] shows the final electron number density profile for each simulation, with the initial density profile of the primary shown for comparison. In all cases, the central density is reduced by a factor $\sim$3-10, and the gas mass is redistributed such that the resulting density profile is considerably flattened towards the center as compared to the initial density profile. Such gas density profiles are better fit by the traditional $\beta$-model [@cav76] than those of “cool-core” clusters, in which the gas density continues to rise towards the center.
Figure \[fig:temp\_profile\] shows the final temperature profile for each simulation, with the initial temperature profile of the primary shown for comparison. The initial profile of the primary is typical of a “cool-core” cluster, featuring a temperature inversion with a negative radial gradient in the outskirts to a positive radial gradient at radii $r {\,\hbox{\lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}\llap{\raise0.6ex\hbox{$<$}}}\,}$ 200 kpc. Each merger converts the temperature profile from this form to one where the temperature rises almost continuously towards the center within approximately the same radial range. The differences are dramatic: in the equal-mass merger cases (simulations S1-S3) the central temperature is increased by nearly $\Delta{T} \approx$ 12 keV, with the 1:3 mass-ratio cases increasing it by $\Delta{T} \approx$ 7-9 keV and the 1:10 mass-ratio cases increasing it by $\Delta{T} \approx$ 3-7 keV.
Figure \[fig:gfrac\_profile\] shows the final gas mass fraction ($f_{\rm gas}(<r) = M_{\rm gas}(<r)/M_{\rm tot}(<r)$) profiles for each simulation, with the initial gas fraction profile of the primary shown for comparison. Each merger considerably lowers the gas mass fraction in the central regions (by nearly a factor of 4 or more in each case), corresponding to the flattening of the gas profile, distributing it to larger radii.
Recent works [e.g. @han09; @hos09; @fal07] have suggested that the combination of X-ray observations with some simple assumptions about the form of the dark matter velocity dispersion profile might allow constraints to be put on quantities such as the magnitude of the dark matter velocity dispersion as well as the degree of its anisotropy. A simple way of achieving this is by defining a “dark matter temperature”, $$k_BT_{\rm DM} \equiv \frac{1}{3}{\mu}m_p\sigma_{\rm DM}^2,
\label{eqn:Tdm}$$ where $\sigma_{\rm DM}$ is the 3-D velocity dispersion of the dark matter particles. This quantity was first introduced by @ike04 to derive the dark matter velocity dispersion and compare it to the gas temperature. Figure \[fig:tdm\_profile\] shows the final dark matter temperature profiles compared to the initial profile. Unlike the gas temperature profiles, the shape of the profile is relatively unaffected by the merger though the overall normalization is increased.
This temperature is not well-defined, due to the fact that there is no thermodynamic equilibrium for a collisionless gas (if it were valid, the Maxwellian assumption mentioned in Section \[sec:ICs\] for generating initial conditions would be accurate), but it may still be phenomenologically useful. Assuming that the velocity of an individual particle is determined solely by the gravitational potential, the equivalence principle might lead one to expect a similar temperature profile between the dark matter and gas components of a galaxy cluster, e.g. $T_{\rm DM}(r) = {\kappa}T_g(r)$. In this way the observed gas temperature may be used to determine the kinetic properties of the dark matter. In the case of relaxed galaxy clusters, it may be sensible to assume $\kappa \approx 1$. Figure \[fig:kappa\_profile\] shows the temperature ratio radial profiles for each simulation. For our initial relaxed primary cluster, the equality $T_{\rm gas} = T_{\rm DM}$ is valid to within 10% for most of the radial range, excepting the cluster core within about 50-100 kpc. For the final merged clusters, over most of the radial range the assumption is still accurate to within 10%, but within the inner 100-200 kpc the profiles begin to diverge. In the innermost regions of the final merger remnants, $T_{\rm DM}$ is only $\sim$20-30% of $T_{\rm gas}$.
Our idealized progenitor clusters began with zero gas velocities relative to the rest frame of the cluster, so it is instructive to examine the velocities which are still present in our resultant systems at the end of our simulations. Figure \[fig:turb\_profile\] shows the total gas velocity dispersion profile, $\sigma_g = \sqrt(\sigma_r^2+\sigma_{\theta}^2+\sigma_{\phi}^2)$, for each simulation. Each merger converts a fraction of its energy into random motions of the gas, with the final velocity dispersion $\sigma_g$ ranging from 100-500 km s$^{-1}$. By far, the head-on mergers generate more turbulent motion than the off-center mergers, which may have significant velocity dispersions at larger radii $r \sim 300$ kpc but fail to penetrate the center of the primary, and the resulting dispersions are correspondingly less. Figure \[fig:rad\_profile\] shows the mean radial velocity profile, $\bar{v_r}$, for each simulation. By the end of each simulation, the mean radial velocities are quite small, with speeds $|\bar{v_r}| {\,\hbox{\lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}\llap{\raise0.6ex\hbox{$<$}}}\,}50$ km s${^-1}$, with the largest velocities at the highest annuli of our profiles ($r {\,\hbox{\lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}\llap{\raise0.6ex\hbox{$>$}}}\,}1$ Mpc). Figure \[fig:circ\_profile\] shows the circular velocity profile at each radius, $V_c = \sqrt(\bar{v_{\theta}}^2 + \bar{v_{\phi}}^2)$. Not surprisingly, head on-mergers generate the least amount of circular velocity ($V_c {\,\hbox{\lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}\llap{\raise0.6ex\hbox{$<$}}}\,}100$ km s$^{-1}$), whereas off-center mergers induce more rotation, up to $V_c \sim 400-500$ km s$^{-1}$ in the strongest cases (equal mass mergers). The highest circular speeds at the end of each simulation are at radii $r {\,\hbox{\lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}\llap{\raise0.6ex\hbox{$>$}}}\,}100$ kpc. Finally, Figure \[fig:mach\_profile\] shows the ratio of the velocity dispersion and the circular velocity to the sound speed of the gas squared; this provides a measure of the pressure support that may be provided by these motions. These values range from $\sim$10-20$\%$ over the radii $r {\,\hbox{\lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}\llap{\raise0.6ex\hbox{$<$}}}\,}$ 200 kpc, with the highest levels of support reaching up to $\sim$30-40$\%$ in the cluster outskirts. These levels of non-thermal pressure support from random and circular motions are consistent with previous results from cosmological simulations [e.g., @pif08; @fan09; @lau09].
{width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"}
{width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"}
{width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"}
In our nine simulations we saw from the entropy maps that the final central entropy and the size of the entropy core varies as both the impact parameter and cluster mass ratio is varied. Figure \[fig:entr\_profile\] shows the final entropy profile for each simulation, with the initial entropy profile of the primary cluster shown for comparison. The combined effect of the heating and expansion of the central gas of the cluster is to raise the entropy of this central gas to a high adiabat. All of the final profiles exhibit a large entropy core where the entropy flattens out in the center, out to a radius of $r \sim 100-500$ kpc, and the value of the central entropy is significantly larger than the initial value, with $S_0 \sim$ 100-500 keV cm$^2$. The behavior of the profile outside of this central floor is close to power-law, essentially unchanged from the progenitor clusters, consistent with the observational and simulation works that show that the real difference between clusters in this regard is in the height of the entropy floor.
Finally, the entropy of the gas in the ICM is closely related to the cooling time, the total energy of the gas divided by the energy loss rate. It is given by [@zhg03]:
$$t_c = 28.69~{\rm Gyr}\left({1.2 \over g}\right)\left({k_BT \over {\rm keV}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\left({n_e \over {10^{-3}~{\rm cm}^{-3}}}\right)^{-1}$$
where $n_e$ is the electron number density, $k_BT$ is the gas temperature in keV, and $g$ is the frequency-averaged Gaunt factor. With some manipulation, the cooling time can be expressed as a function of entropy and electron density:
$$t_c = 28.69~{\rm Gyr}\left({1.2 \over g}\right)\left({S \over {100~{\rm keV~cm^2}}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\left({n_e \over {10^{-3}~{\rm cm}^{-3}}}\right)^{-2/3}
\label{eqn:tcool}$$
{width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"}
{width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"}
In Figure \[fig:cool\_profile\] we show the cooling time profiles for the nine simulations at $t$ = 10 Gyr, with the age of the universe marked on the plot for comparison. All of the central cooling times have been significantly increased, by a factor of $\sim$6-20 over the initial value of $\sim$1 Gyr at the very center of the cluster. From Equation \[eqn:tcool\], we see that this is consistent with the large increases in entropy in the cluster cores.
Discussion {#sec:disc}
==========
To Mix or Not to Mix? {#sec:mixing_disc}
---------------------
In previous investigations of ICM mixing using controlled merger simulations, it has been reported that the ICM component in these simulations does not efficiently mix. @rit02, using SPH simulations, defined the degree of mixing as we have above and reported that the ICM only mixed well in the centers of merger remnants. @poo08 investigated mixing from the perspective of metallicity gradients, and found no significant flattening of the metallicity profile (which would imply mixing of gas of different metallicities) following a merger in any of their simulations. @ric01 did not investigate mixing, and in that case the reduced resolution of their simulations would have resulted in the suppression of smaller-wavelength unstable perturbations, lessening the amount of mixing. Additionally, we are concerned with the effects of merger heating on progenitor clusters with cool cores, whereas the initial systems in that study were more akin to our resultant systems. On the other hand, in an idealized setup of an infalling subcluster into a large cluster of galaxies, @tak05 showed that as the subcluster falls into the core of the main cluster, its gas is thoroughly mixed due to Rayleigh-Taylor and Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities. The resolution of the grid ($\Delta{x} = 2$ kpc) and the values of the chosen cluster masses in their simulations are similar to the values in our simulations.
{width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"}
{width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"}
{width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"}
{width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"}
{width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"}
{width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"} {width="30.00000%"}
Our simulations demonstrate that significant mixing can occur as a result of major merging. Figures \[fig:entr\_S1\] through \[fig:entr\_S9\] demonstrate that fluid instabilities are ubiquitous throughout the duration of the merger, mixing the gas thoroughly. The presumed reason for the discrepancy is the choice of method to perform the simulations. The simulations of @rit02 and @poo08 were performed using SPH methods. A recent comparison of galaxy cluster merger simulations from a SPH code (GADGET-2) and a PPM code (FLASH) revealed that in the SPH simulations mixing of the two cluster components is inhibited, whereas in the PPM simulations the cluster components are thoroughly mixed [@mit08]. It has been demonstrated recently by @age07 that spurious pressure forces can result at density gradients in SPH simulations, resulting from overestimations of the gas density of particles approaching a high-density region. As a result the growth of Rayleigh-Taylor and Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities is inhibited. In addition, @dol05 and @wad08 showed that the artificial viscosity used in most SPH implementations acts to damp turbulent motions. Therefore, in a galaxy cluster merger simulation, both of these effects can inhibit the mixing of gas from the two cluster components. In contrast, PPM simulations such as ours produce the right results for this physical setup, noting the fact that in real clusters other physical mechanisms (such as viscosity and magnetic fields) may come into play. The results of our investigation over a parameter space of mergers were anticipated by the grid-based hydrodynamical simulations of @tak05. In their simplified setup of two rigid gravitational potentials, they showed that the gas from a subcluster falling into a large galaxy cluster will be ram-pressure stripped and mixed into the main cluster gas due to the action of Kelvin-Helmholtz and Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities.
Supporting this, we find a correspondence between the amount of mixing of the two cluster gas components and the velocity dispersion of the gas in the final merger remnants (Figures \[fig:mix\_profile\] and \[fig:turb\_profile\]). Where higher velocity dispersions have been generated in the cluster cores, there is a corresponding higher degree of mixing. Figures \[fig:entr\_S1\] through \[fig:entr\_S9\] showed the ubiquitous presence of instabilities as each merger proceeds, and it is these instabilities that seeded the random velocities that efficiently mix the gas. In corresponding SPH simulations the instabilities would be largely absent.
A caveat to these results is that despite the high resolution of these simulations, perturbations with wavelengths smaller than the smallest zone size ($\Delta{x} \approx 5h^{-1}$ kpc) are not resolved. Similarly, the turbulent cascade is not resolved below this length scale. It is possible that resolving these modes would enable more mixing of the gas than is present in these simulations. Simulations with higher resolution or subgrid models for turbulence [see, e.g. @sca08; @mai09], would be necessary to determine whether or not this is the case.
Destroying Cool Cores {#sec:bye_bye_cool_cores}
---------------------
In all of the cases investigated here, the initially compact cool cores are completely destroyed as a result of the merger, and replaced with low-density, high-temperature, high-entropy cores. This is especially true in the cases where significant mixing of the cluster gases have occurred, such as each of the head-on mergers and all of the equal-mass cases. It is clear from Figures \[fig:entr\_S1\] through \[fig:entr\_S9\] that this entropy increase primarily occurs through the mixing of high and low-entropy gases caused by the onset of fluid instabilities.
There is a correlation in our simulations between the height of the central entropy floor and the degree of mixing. In the equal-mass mergers, the inner $\sim$0.5 Mpc is very mixed, but there is a higher degree of mixing at larger radii in the off-center cases than in the head-on case. This is because in the off-center cases the cluster cores slip past each other and are stripped by instabilities, allowing for mixing over a large surface area, in contrast to the head-on case where the cores collide inelastically with each other and mixing only initially occurs at the boundary between the two clusters. Correspondingly, the entropy floor in simulations S2 and S3 is somewhat higher (nearly by a factor of 2) than in simulation S1, and the entropy floor has a larger extent. The differences in mixing are most evident in the 1:3 and the 1:10 mass-ratio mergers. In cases of zero impact parameter, the smaller, denser cluster (the secondary) penetrates the gas of the larger and allows for significant mixing of the central ICM of the two clusters, nearly 100$\%$ for the $R$ = 1:3, $b$ = 0 kpc case (simulation S4) and approximately 60$\%$ for the $R$ = 1:10, $b$ = 0 kpc case (simulation S7). It is in these cases where the greatest increase in core entropy is seen. However, in the off-center cases, most of the gas from the secondary is stripped as it proceeds along its trajectory, and so, though there is mixing in the cluster outskirts, the core of the primary is considerably less mixed with material from the other cluster. We still see a significant amount of mixing between the two components in simulation S5, so its entropy floor is comparable to that of S4, but the entropy floor of S6 is lower (by about a factor of two) where the core of the primary has been relatively unmixed with that of the secondary. In simulations S8 and S9 the inner $\sim$250 kpc has been relatively untouched, and they have roughly equal low entropy floors when compared to the merger product of simulation S7, which has been disrupted by the head-on collision.
It should be noted that our diagnostic for mixing, $M$, only indicates where material from the different clusters has mixed together. Even in the simulations where the central cores of the primary cluster remain relatively untouched by the gas from the secondary, mixing still plays an important role. The merger event sets of a process of “sloshing” of the center cluster gas in the dark matter potential [as in @asc06], bringing higher entropy gas (which is still from the main cluster) in from higher radii, which is then mixed with the lower entropy gas, raising the central regions to a higher adiabat (see Figure \[fig:sloshing\] for examples of core gas sloshing from our simulations). An example from these simulations of this effect is seen in the 1:3 mass-ratio cases, where the entropy floors of simulations S4 and S5 have been raised to the same adiabat but the gas from the two clusters has mixed only $\sim$2/3 as much in the latter case. Although the mixing between the two cluster components was not complete, the central gas in this case still mixed with higher entropy gas from its own component, raising the entropy in the central regions. A detailed examination of this process in the context of an AMR code such as FLASH was carried out by @zuh10.
In general, it has been shown that the results of non-radiative cosmological simulations depend on the numerical scheme adopted for hydrodynamics. Mesh-based Eulerian codes (such as FLASH) systematically produce higher entropy gas cores than do particle-based hydrodynamic approaches [see, e.g., @fre99; @osh05; @voit05c]. @mit08 concluded that the extra gas mixing in the PPM simulations was responsible for this difference. In their simulation the time period of greatest difference in entropy generation between the PPM and SPH codes was the timescale of merger evolution during which large vortices and turbulent eddies were present in the PPM simulation, mixing the gas. Supporting this conclusion, works where the SPH algorithm has been modified to more properly resolve turbulent motions, instabilities, and mixing of the gas [such as @dol05; @kaw09] results in higher central entropy profiles in the merger remnants.
@mit08 noted that the ability of mesh-based codes to produce high entropy floors may have implications for observations of cluster entropy profiles. They speculated that heating from recent merger events might be responsible for the observed clusters that do not possess cool, low entropy cores, but rather large high-entropy cores such as the final merger products seen in our simulations. Recent works [e.g. @cav09; @pra09] have clarified the existence of a bimodal distribution of cluster central entropies, with a large population of clusters possessing low-entropy cores ($S_0 {\,\hbox{\lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}\llap{\raise0.6ex\hbox{$<$}}}\,}30$ keV cm$^2$) and a similarly large population possessing high-entropy cores $S_0 {\,\hbox{\lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}\llap{\raise0.6ex\hbox{$>$}}}\,}50$ keV cm$^2$). The former set of clusters corresponds to cool-core systems much like our initial systems. The latter set of clusters may have had their core entropies raised by recent merging, and correspond to our resultant systems. @pra09 pointed out a correlation between central gas mass fraction and central entropy, noting that the high-entropy floor clusters correspondingly had low central gas mass fractions. This is exactly what happens in each of our merger cases. This work indicates that mergers of clusters with even small subclusters could significantly raise the central entropy floor and central cooling time. Previous investigations using astrophysical codes where mixing was suppressed have indicated that merging was not able to sustain high central entropies and cooling times, but simulations with realistic mixing such as these suggest the opposite conclusion.
To demonstrate this conclusively, however, this work must be extended to more physically realistic setups. Mixing in the real ICM may not be as efficient or even more efficient than in our simulations due to additional physical processes that may be operational in the ICM. A real physical viscosity would act to dissipate turbulence and suppress fluid instabilities. Magnetic fields would only allow movement of the plasma along the field lines and would similarly partially suppress instabilities and mixing. Conduction, if efficient, would smooth out temperature, density, and velocity gradients, also suppressing instabilities [see, e.g. @vie07]. On the other hand, a more accurate characterization of the turbulent cascade (by either performing simulations at higher resolution or by implementing a turbulent subgrid model) would likely increase the amount of mixing. Finally, to make a direct determination of the efficiency of heating generated from mergers cooling must be self-consistently included in the simulations. This would be necessary for a more direct comparison to the results of cosmological simulations. For example, @bur08, using a cosmological grid-based simulation with cooling and supernova feedback, have shown that cool cores are resilient to cluster mergers. In order to compare more directly with this result it would be necessary to include cooling in our simulations. Despite the limitations of the present work, it reinforces the conclusion of @mit08 that merging remains a serious candidate for heating the ICM.
Deriving Dark Matter Properties from Gas {#sec:dm_from_gas}
----------------------------------------
Depending on the degree to which dark matter can be understood to be “collisionless” (in the absence of other mechanisms such as self-interaction or annihilation), it is not expected to be subject to the fundamentally microscopic processes of heating and cooling that affects the plasma of the ICM. Consequently, though the form of the DM “temperature” radial profiles are remarkably stable and retain their essential form after a merger (Figure \[fig:tdm\_profile\]), the gas temperature profiles have been transformed from cool-core like profiles with positive temperature gradients into profiles with negative or flat temperature gradients after a merger (Figure \[fig:temp\_profile\]). It therefore can be expected that methods of determining dark matter properties by assuming equivalence between the dark matter “temperature” and the temperature of the gas will fail in the centers ($r {\,\hbox{\lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}\llap{\raise0.6ex\hbox{$<$}}}\,}200$ kpc) of galaxy clusters. Figure \[fig:kappa\_profile\] confirms this expectation. In one sense, this reflects difficulties already known with using the thermodynamic state of the ICM to derive properties of clusters, in that the large differences in the central temperature and density structure between clusters (due to nongravitational heating of the gas such as AGN) must be accounted for in order to determine their effect on deriving quantities under the assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium. For example, global X-ray spectral temperatures of clusters are typically derived by excising the central emission out to some radius (typically $0.15r_{500}$, $0.1r_{200}$), in order to achieve a higher degree of similarity between temperature profiles [e.g., @vik06; @vik09a]. However, we saw that as a result of merging the deviation of $\kappa$ from unity at the end of the simulation can be larger than 20% even out to a radius of $r \approx 250$ kpc, depending on the strength of the merger. Attempts to derive the kinetic properties of dark matter from the properties of the X-ray-emitting gas must take this fact into account when applying this technique to clusters that show signs of recent merging.
Conclusions {#sec:conc}
===========
We have performed a set of fiducial binary galaxy cluster merger simulations that explore a parameter space over initial mass ratio and impact parameter. In this first of a series of papers we focus on the mixing of the intracluster medium between the two clusters and the resulting effect on the thermodynamics of the gas of the merger remnant. In contrast to previous merger parameter space studies but in agreement with recent works focusing on mixing, we find that the gas of the merging clusters mixes very efficiently. The degree of mixing is dependent upon the mass ratio and impact parameter of the cluster merger, but all of the mergers investigated here demonstrate a significant amount of mixing in some regions of the final merger remnant. This is a result of ubiquitous presence of fluid instabilities that occur as the merger generates large shear flows and sharp density gradients, which are resolved in grid-based fluid codes such as the one used in this study but not in particle-based fluid codes used in many previous works. These instabilities result in the mixing of high and low-entropy gas and as a result the thermodynamic state of the primary cluster’s core is dramatically affected. In each case the cluster has been changed from one with a high-density, low-entropy, low-temperature core with a short cooling time to a low-density, high-temperature, high-entropy core with a long cooling time. This is the case even for mergers with smaller subclusters. Further evidence that mixing is the culprit is indicated by the correlation between final merged systems with high central gas velocity dispersions and high central entropies, as the greater random motions in these systems allow for more efficient mixing. This result may also pose a difficulty for attempts to derive the kinetic properties of the dark matter from the thermodynamic properties of the X-ray emitting gas, which rely on the hypothesis of the near-equality of the gas temperature and dark matter velocity dispersion profiles. Additionally, such efficiency in heating the cluster core may be a primary factor in the generation of a population of galaxy clusters with high entropy floors and cooling times. Further simulation works including more realistic physics for the ICM (on the one hand, dissipative effects, magnetic fields, which would suppress mixing, and on the other hand, a more accurate characterization of the turbulence via higher resolution or a turbulent subgrid model which would enhance it) are needed to confirm this hypothesis. In spite of this, the main result of this work is that merging is still a serious candidate for the generation of heat to balance against cooling in the cores of galaxy clusters.
JAZ is grateful to Don Lamb, Paul Ricker, Maxim Markevitch, Ryan Johnson, Eric Hallman, Ian Parrish, and Andrey Kravtsov for discussions and advice. Calculations were performed using the computational resources of Argonne National Laboratory and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. JAZ is supported under [*Chandra*]{} grant GO8-9128X. The software used in this work was in part developed by the DOE-supported ASC / Alliance Center for Astrophysical Thermonuclear Flashes at the University of Chicago.
Ascasibar, Y., & Markevitch, M. 2006, , 650, 102 Agertz, O., et al. 2007, , 380, 963 Akahori, T., & Yoshikawa, K. 2008, , 60, L19 Bahcall, J. N., & Sarazin, C. L. 1977, , 213, L99 Bekki, K., & Couch, W. J. 2003, , 596, L13 Binney, J., & Tabor, G. 1995, , 276, 663 Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. 1987, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1987, 747 p. Boehringer, H., Voges, W., Fabian, A. C., Edge, A. C., & Neumann, D. M. 1993, , 264, L25 Bogdanovi[ć]{}, T., Reynolds, C. S., Balbus, S. A., & Parrish, I. J. 2009, , 704, 211 Burns, J. O., Hallman, E. J., Gantner, B., Motl, P. M., & Norman, M. L. 2008, , 675, 1125 Cavagnolo, K. W., Donahue, M., Voit, G. M., & Sun, M. 2009, , 182, 12 Cavaliere, A., & Fusco-Femiano, R. 1976, , 49, 137 Cho, J., Lazarian, A., Honein, A., Knaepen, B., Kassinos, S., & Moin, P. 2003, , 589, L77 Clowe, D., Brada[č]{}, M., Gonzalez, A. H., Markevitch, M., Randall, S. W., Jones, C., & Zaritsky, D. 2006, , 648, L109 Colafrancesco, S., & Marchegiani, P. 2008, , 484, 51 Colella, P., & Woodward, P. R. 1984, Journal of Computational Physics, 54, 174 David, L. P., Nulsen, P. E. J., McNamara, B. R., Forman, W., Jones, C., Ponman, T., Robertson, B., & Wise, M. 2001, , 557, 546 Dolag, K., Vazza, F., Brunetti, G., & Tormen, G. 2005, , 364, 753 Eddington, A. S. 1916, , 76, 572 Fabian, A. C., & Nulsen, P. E. J. 1977, , 180, 479 Fabian, A. C. 1994, , 32, 277 Fabian, A. C., Voigt, L. M., & Morris, R. G. 2002, , 335, L71 Fabian, A. C., Sanders, J. S., Taylor, G. B., Allen, S. W., Crawford, C. S., Johnstone, R. M., & Iwasawa, K. 2006, , 366, 417 Faltenbacher, A., Hoffman, Y., Gottl[ö]{}ber, S., & Yepes, G. 2007, , 376, 1327 Fang, T., Humphrey, P., & Buote, D. 2009, , 691, 1648 Forman, W., et al. 2007, , 665, 1057 Frenk, C. S., et al. 1999, , 525, 554 Fryxell, B., et al. 2000, , 131, 273 Fujita, Y., Takizawa, M., Nagashima, M., & Enoki, M. 1999, , 51, L1 G[ó]{}mez, P. L., Loken, C., Roettiger, K., & Burns, J. O. 2002, , 569, 122 Hansen, S. H. 2009, , 694, 1250 Host, O., Hansen, S. H., Piffaretti, R., Morandi, A., Ettori, S., Kay, S. T., & Valdarnini, R. 2009, , 690, 358 Ikebe, Y., B[ö]{}hringer, H., & Kitayama, T. 2004, , 611, 175 Inoue, S., & Sasaki, S. 2001, , 562, 618 Kawata, D., Okamoto, T., Cen, R., & Gibson, B. K. 2009, arXiv:0902.4002 Kazantzidis, S., Magorrian, J., & Moore, B. 2004, , 601, 37 Kazantzidis, S., Zentner, A. R., & Kravtsov, A. V. 2006, , 641, 647 Kitayama, T., & Suto, Y. 1996, , 469, 480 Lau, E. T., Kravtsov, A. V., & Nagai, D. 2009, , 705, 1129 Lloyd-Davies, E. J., Ponman, T. J., & Cannon, D. B. 2000, , 315, 689 Mahdavi, A., Hoekstra, H., Babul, A., Balam, D. D., & Capak, P. L. 2007, , 668, 806 Maier, A., Iapichino, L., Schmidt, W., & Niemeyer, J. C. 2009, arXiv:0909.1800 Markevitch, M., Gonzalez, A. H., David, L., Vikhlinin, A., Murray, S., Forman, W., Jones, C., & Tucker, W. 2002, , 567, L27 Markevitch, M., et al. 2003, , 586, L19 Markevitch, M., Govoni, F., Brunetti, G., & Jerius, D. 2005, , 627, 733 Mastropietro, C., & Burkert, A. 2008, , 389, 967 McCarthy, I. G., et al. 2007, , 376, 497 McNamara, B. R., et al. 2001, , 562, L149 McNamara, B. R., Nulsen, P. E. J., Wise, M. W., Rafferty, D. A., Carilli, C., Sarazin, C. L., & Blanton, E. L. 2005, , 433, 45 McNamara, B. R., & Nulsen, P. E. J. 2007, , 45, 117 Mitchell, N. L., McCarthy, I. G., Bower, R. G., Theuns, T., & Crain, R. A. 2009, , 395, 180 Morandi, A., & Ettori, S. 2007, , 380, 1521 Narayan, R., & Medvedev, M. V. 2001, , 562, L129 Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. 1997, , 490, 493 O’Shea, B. W., Nagamine, K., Springel, V., Hernquist, L., & Norman, M. L. 2005, , 160, 1 Parrish, I. J., & Quataert, E. 2008, , 677, L9 Parrish, I. J., Quataert, E., & Sharma, P. 2009, , 703, 96 Parrish, I. J., Quataert, E., & Sharma, P. 2010, , 712, L194 Peebles, P. J. E. 1969, , 155, 393 Peterson, J. R., et al. 2001, , 365, L104 Peterson, J. R., Kahn, S. M., Paerels, F. B. S., Kaastra, J. S., Tamura, T., Bleeker, J. A. M., Ferrigno, C., & Jernigan, J. G. 2003, , 590, 207 Peterson, J. R., & Fabian, A. C. 2006, , 427, 1 Piffaretti, R., & Valdarnini, R. 2008, , 491, 71 Poole, G. B., Fardal, M. A., Babul, A., McCarthy, I. G., Quinn, T., & Wadsley, J. 2006, , 373, 881 Poole, G. B., Babul, A., McCarthy, I. G., Fardal, M. A., Bildfell, C. J., Quinn, T., & Mahdavi, A. 2007, , 380, 437 Poole, G. B., Babul, A., McCarthy, I. G., Sanderson, A. J. R., & Fardal, M. A. 2008, , 391, 1163 Ponman, T. J., Sanderson, A. J. R., & Finoguenov, A. 2003, , 343, 331 Pratt, G. W., et al. 2009, arXiv:0909.3776 Quataert, E. 2008, , 673, 758 Randall, S. W., Markevitch, M., Clowe, D., Gonzalez, A. H., & Brada[č]{}, M. 2008, , 679, 1173 Ricker, P. M. 2008, ApJS, 176, 293 Ricker, P. M., & Sarazin, C. L. 2001, , 561, 621 Ritchie, B. W., & Thomas, P. A. 2002, , 329, 675 Roettiger, K., Loken, C., & Burns, J. O. 1997, , 109, 307 Ruszkowski, M., & Oh, S. P. 2010, , 713, 1332 Sarazin, C. L. 1988, Cambridge Astrophysics Series, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988 Scannapieco, E., & Br[ü]{}ggen, M. 2008, , 686, 927 Soker, N., & Sarazin, C. L. 1990, , 348, 73 Springel, V., & Farrar, G. R. 2007, , 380, 911 Takizawa, M. 2005, , 629, 791 Takizawa, M. 2006, , 58, 925 Takizawa, M., Nagino, R., & Matsushita, K. 2010, arXiv:1004.3322 Vieser, W., & Hensler, G. 2007, , 472, 141 Vikhlinin, A., Kravtsov, A., Forman, W., Jones, C., Markevitch, M., Murray, S. S., & Van Speybroeck, L. 2006, , 640, 691 Vikhlinin, A., et al. 2009, , 692, 1033 Vikhlinin, A., et al. 2009, , 692, 1060 Vitvitska, M., Klypin, A. A., Kravtsov, A. V., Wechsler, R. H., Primack, J. R., & Bullock, J. S. 2002, , 581, 799 Voigt, L. M., & Fabian, A. C. 2004, , 347, 1130 Voit, G. M. 2005, Reviews of Modern Physics, 77, 207 Voit, G. M., Kay, S. T., & Bryan, G. L. 2005, , 364, 909 Wadsley, J. W., Veeravalli, G., & Couchman, H. M. P. 2008, , 387, 427 White, S. D. M., Briel, U. G., & Henry, J. P. 1993, , 261, L8 Zakamska, N. L., & Narayan, R. 2003, , 582, 162 Zhang, Y.-Y., & Wu, X.-P. 2003, , 583, 529 ZuHone, J. A., Lamb, D. Q., & Ricker, P. M. 2009, , 696, 694 ZuHone, J. A., Ricker, P. M., Lamb, D. Q., & Karen Yang, H.-Y. 2009, , 699, 1004 ZuHone, J. A., Markevitch, M., & Johnson, R. E. 2010, , 717, 908 Zwicky, F. 1937, , 86, 217
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'In Einstein-Maxwell theory, magnetic flux lines are ‘expelled’ from a black hole as extremality is approached, in the sense that the component of the field strength normal to the horizon goes to zero. Thus, extremal black holes are found to exhibit the sort of ‘Meissner effect’ which is characteristic of superconducting media. We review some of the evidence for this effect, and do present new evidence for it using recently found black hole solutions in string theory and Kaluza-Klein theory. We also present some new solutions, which arise naturally in string theory, which are [*non*]{}-superconducting extremal black holes. We present a nice geometrical interpretation of these effects derived by looking carefully at the higher dimensional configurations from which the lower dimensional black hole solutions are obtained. We show that other extremal solitonic objects in string theory (such as $p$-branes) can also display superconducting properties. In particular, we argue that the relativistic London equation will hold on the worldvolume of ‘light’ superconducting $p$-branes (which are embedded in flat space), and that minimally coupled zero modes will propagate in the adS factor of the near-horizon geometries of ‘heavy’, or gravitating, superconducting $p$-branes.'
address: |
\
[$^1$]{} DAMTP, Silver Street\
Cambridge, CB3 9EW, England\
[$^2$]{} Department of Mathematical Sciences\
University of Durham\
Durham DH1 3LE, England
author:
- 'A. Chamblin[$^{1}$]{}, R. Emparan[$^2$]{} and G.W. Gibbons[$^1$]{}'
title: 'Superconducting $p$-branes and extremal black holes'
---
\#1\#2
Introduction
============
As is well known, the phenomenon known as ‘superconductivity’ was first discovered (and named) in 1911 by H. Kammerlingh-Onnes. Kammerlingh-Onnes, in the course of studying the electric resistance of certain metals which were cooled to liquid helium temperatures, found that the resistance of mercury dropped drastically as the temperature was reduced from $4^{\circ}K$ to $3^{\circ}K$. Later authors found that the temperature range over which the drop in resistivity occurs is extremely small. Thus, people were led to discover the first well-understood property of superconducting media: Below a certain critical temperature ($T_c$), the electric resistance of the medium is zero (to within experimentally relevant bounds). This behaviour is of course the origin of the term, superconductor.
On the other hand, given a superconducting medium at some temperature $T<T_c$, it is always possible to get rid of the superconductivity by applying a minimum magnetic field $B>B_c$, where $B_c(T)$ is some critical value of the magnetic field which depends on the temperature $T$. The destruction of superconductivity by a sufficiently strong magnetic field, together with the fact that the superconductor has zero resistance, leads one inevitably to the conclusion that the magnetic induction must vanish inside a superconductor, i.e., $B=0$. This property of superconductors, which is actually experimentally observed (i.e., a magnet will ‘float’ above a superconducting medium), is known as the ‘Meissner effect’. The Meissner effect is succinctly expressed by the statement that a superconductor displays perfect diamagnetism. It is this property of superconducting media which is the principal focus of this paper. In fact, in this paper we shall use the terms ‘perfect diamagnet’ and ‘superconductor’ interchangeably, even though technically perfect conductivity is only a necessary (not sufficient) condition for perfect diamagnetism.
One may view superconductivity at various levels. One may begin by constructing a purely phemonological macroscopic theory in which Maxwell’s equations are taken as fundamental and one supplements them with constitutive relations, of which the the most useful is the London equation. One may then pass to a classical thermodynamic formulation of the phenomenon. Finally one may attempt to identify the quantum mechanical microscopic degrees of freedom responsible. In this paper we shall mainly be concerned with the phemonological theory. We will establish the existence in classical supergravity theories an analogue of the usual Meissner effect. We will also have some suggestions as to how the purely phenomenological theory may be extended to a thermodynamic and quantum mechanical theory.
In fact the behaviour of magnetic field lines in the presence of strong gravitational fields has been investigated for some time by many authors (see, e.g., [@wald; @klk; @ernst; @ew; @bicak]). In particular, in 1974 Wald [@wald] studied the behaviour of Maxwell test fields in the presence of a rotating black hole described by the Kerr solution. Using the fact that a Killing vector in a vacuum spacetime acts as a vector potential for the Maxwell test field, it is not hard to see that as the hole is ‘spun up’ and approaches extremality, the component of the magnetic field $B$ normal to the horizon tends to zero; thus, the flux lines are expelled in the extremal limit and the hole behaves like a perfect diamagnet.
This effect was noticed and then confirmed in Einstein-Maxwell theory, to linear order in the magnetic field, by Bič[á]{}k and Dvoř[á]{}k [@bicak]. In particular, they studied Reissner-Nordstrom holes in the presence of magnetic fields induced by current loops. In [@bicak] very nice pictures are presented for the field lines around a hole as it approaches extremality, so the emergence of the Meissner effect can actually be seen. More recently, the authors of [@cham] considered an Abelian Higgs vortex in the Reissner-Nordstrom background. It was shown that in the extreme limit (but not near extremality) [*all*]{} of the fields associated with the vortex (both the magnetic and scalar degrees of freedom) are expelled from the horizon of the black hole. The magnetic and scalar fields always ‘wrap around’ the horizon in the extremal limit.
In this paper we shall first review the evidence that (light) $p$-branes are superconducting (Section \[light\]), and then attempt to extend the analysis to include the effect of self-gravitation (Section \[selfg\]). The appearance of a form of the Meissner effect on the extremal horizon of a brane (Section \[strmeiss\]) leads us to perform a comprehensive analysis of magnetic fields in the vicinity of extremal horizons (Section \[extrmeiss\]). We establish the existence of this effect in widely generic settings, which include Kaluza-Klein and string theories. Moreover, we also present some exact solutions for extremal black holes in external fields which exhibit this Meissner effect. These should serve to dispel the notion that the effect is an artifact of the linearized approximation to the theory which could disappear after including the backreaction. We also address (Appendix \[nonsuc\]) some subtle examples where apparently the field expulsion breaks down. A closer examination shows, however, that in those examples one should not have expected the expulsion to happen in the first place, because of an interaction induced by the presence of a Chern-Simons term.
Superconducting extended objects: Light branes {#light}
==============================================
We begin with a description of the superconducting properties of [*light*]{} branes. That is, in this section we ignore the coupling of the $p$-branes to gravity, so that we may think of the branes as extended, sheet like objects (of zero thickness) moving in a flat spacetime background, with dynamics described by a Dirac-Born-Infeld action. In the next section, we will consider the superconducting properties of spacetimes describing gravitating branes. The superconducting properties of light branes have been discussed previously by Nielsen and Olesen [@nielsen; @nielole] and by Balachandran et al. [@bal] (superconducting vortices with non-zero thickness, such as those examined in [@witten], will not be discussed here). Before reformulating their ideas in a geometrical language which generalizes to the case of heavy branes we recall for the readers’ convenience some basic facts about the Meissner effect.
Phenomenological accounts of superconductivity distinguish carefully between [*perfect conductivity*]{} , i.e. $\sigma \rightarrow \infty \Leftrightarrow {\bf E} = {\bf j} /\sigma =0$ and [*perfect diamagnetism*]{}. i.e. $\mu \rightarrow \infty \Rightarrow {\bf
B}=0$. The former merely implies that ${\partial {\bf B} / \partial t}=0$ which in turn implies that an arbitrary amount of flux may be frozen into the sample depending upon initial conditions. The latter however goes some way to implying the Meissner effect, i.e. that flux is expelled from the material so the superconducting state is independent of initial conditions.
One may regard the Meissner effect as as a consequence of the so-called Becker-Heller-Sauter equation $$\begin{aligned}
\label{bhs}
{\bf E}= \lambda ^2 \,{\partial {\bf j} \over \partial t}\end{aligned}$$ for some constant $\lambda$. This yields (on use of charge conservation) the freezing of magnetic flux: $$\begin{aligned}
\label{bhs2}
{\partial \over \partial t} \Bigl ({\bf B} + \lambda ^2 {\rm curl} \,{\bf j}
\Bigr )=0.\end{aligned}$$ The strictly stronger non-relativistic London equation $$\begin{aligned}
\label{lon}
\lambda ^2 {\rm curl } \,{\bf j} + {\bf B}=0\end{aligned}$$ implies the Meissner effect more directly and yields, on use of Faraday‘s law ${\rm curl} ~ {\bf E} = - {\partial {\bf B} / \partial t}$ $$\begin{aligned}
\label{lon2}
{\rm curl} \Bigl ( {\bf E} - \lambda ^2 {\bf j} \Bigr )=0
\Rightarrow {\bf E} - \lambda ^2 {\bf j} = - {\rm grad }\psi\end{aligned}$$ for some scalar field $\psi$.
In a relativistic generalization of the London equation is $$\begin{aligned}
\label{rlon}
-{ 1 \over \lambda ^2} F_{\mu \nu} = \partial _\mu J_\nu - \partial _\nu J _
\mu\end{aligned}$$ or $$\label{rlon2}
J_\mu = -{ 1\over \lambda ^2} A _\mu + {\partial}_{\mu} \Lambda$$ for some function $\Lambda$. Because ${\nabla}_{\mu}F_{\mu \nu} = -J_{\nu}$, we have $$\label{rmeiss}
-{\nabla}^{2}J - \frac{1}{{\lambda}^{2}} = 0$$ so the mass of the vector field is given as $\frac{1}{{\lambda}^{2}}$. If $\Lambda =0$ and in the absence of charges eqn. (\[rlon\]) is equivalent to eqn. (\[bhs\]) and eqn. (\[lon\]). In what follows we shall adopt eqn (\[rlon\]) as our criterion for superconductivity.
Balachandran et al. [@bal] have argued that eqn. (\[rlon\]) typically holds on the worldvolume $\Sigma$ of extended objects and Nielsen has shown, in the context of Kaluza-Klein theory, that the relativistic London equation will hold on the worldvolume of extended objects carrying Kaluza-Klein currents [@nielsen]. The basic idea behind Nielsen’s observation is that if $K^a$ is a Killing vector field generating a circle subgroup of the Kaluza–Klein group $G$ of isometries of a higher dimensional Kaluza-Klein manifold ${\cal E}$ and $\pi: {\cal E} \rightarrow {\cal M}$ the projection onto the spacetime manifold $\cal M$ and $$\
F^{ab} = \nabla ^a K^b - \nabla ^b K ^a
\label{Killer}$$ then $\pi _\star F^{ab}$ is the Kaluza-Klein field strength on spacetime $\cal M$. Now if $x: \Sigma \rightarrow {\cal E}$ is an immersion or embedding of a $p+1$ dimensional submanifold or brane $\Sigma$ and $x_\pi= \pi \circ x$ the projection down to spacetime $\cal M$ then the pull back $J= x^\star K$ of the Killing vector field $K$ to the worldvolume $\Sigma$ yields (via Noether’s theorem and the field equations for the embedding $x$) a conserved current $J$ on the worldvolume. But clearly pulling back eqn. (\[Killer\]) to the worldvolume shows that $\pi _\star F$ and $J$ satisfy the London equation on $\Sigma$, i.e. $\Sigma$ is superconducting with respect to the the Kaluza-Klein current. We shall refer to this type of superconductivity as Nielsen superconductivity.
So far we have not used any field equations, either for the brane or for the background in which it moves. For light branes in some fixed background the equations of motion of a brane with vanishing Born-Infeld field on the worldvolume and vanishing Ramond-Ramond fields in the bulk require that it be a minimal submanifold, a particular case of which is a totally geodesic submanifold. In the next section we shall see that some self-gravitating branes satisfying the Einstein equations may be identifed with totally geodesic submanifolds. We can then see to what extent they exhibit Nielsen superconductivity.
Superconducting self-gravitating extended objects {#selfg}
=================================================
In the last section we investigated the superconducting aspects of extended objects which have decoupled from gravity. This limit, where the branes are ‘light’ so that one may focus strictly on the worldvolume terms in the action, has been extensively studied by recent authors [@bi]. In this section we consider the complementary description of extended objects in supergravity theories, which comes from focussing on the ‘bulk’ action terms, which describe the fields which propagate in the bulk away from the brane. These bulk terms are of course just the effective supergravity Lagrangian terms which are obtained from the low energy limit of string theory and/or M-theory. One may therefore approximate the gravitational fields of $p$-branes, at least semi-classically, by looking for solutions of the supergravity equations of motion with the relevant symmetries.
Generically, these solutions will have event and Cauchy horizons, and there will no longer exist any ‘brane worldvolume’. A natural question, then, is where the degrees of freedom associated with the brane are located. Before tackling that question we shall consider some examples where the location of the brane is relatively unambigous.
One of the simplest such self-gravitating brane solutions is the 6-brane of eleven-dimensional supergravity. Geometrically this is a product $${\cal E} \equiv M_{TN_k} \times {\Bbb E}^{6,1},$$ where $M_{TN_k}$ is the multi-Taub-NUT metric with $k$ centres $$ds^2= V^{-1} (d\tau + \omega _i dx^i)^2 + V dx^i dx^i,$$ with $V=1 + \sum { 1\over |{\bf x}- {\bf x}_i | }$. The group $G= U(1)$. The 6-branes are located at the ${\bf x}= {\bf x}_i$. These are fixed point sets of the the Killing field $\partial / \partial \tau $ and hence, by a standard result, totally geodesic submanifolds. Not only does the Killing field vanish on the branes but so does the two-form (\[Killer\]).
Consider now two orthogonally intersecting sets of 6-branes. Geometrically we have the product $${\cal E}\equiv M^{x} _{TN_k} \times M^{x^\prime} _{TN_{k^\prime} }\times
{\Bbb
E}^{2,1}.$$ There are now two Kaluza-Klein $U(1)$ Killing fields, i.e. $G=
U(1) \times U(1) ^\prime$. One Killing field vanishes at ${\bf x}= {\bf x}_i$ and the other at ${\bf x}^\prime = {\bf x}^\prime_i$. However, apart from at the intersection, one $U(1)$ Killing vector potential and the associated two-form (\[Killer\]) are non-vanishing on the 6-brane of the other type.
We are now in a position to apply Nielsen’s argument as formulated in the previous section. Clearly the branes at ${\bf x}^\prime =
{\bf x}^\prime_i$ are superconducting with respect to $\partial / \partial \tau $ and the branes at ${\bf x} = {\bf x}_i$ are superconducting with respect to $\partial / \partial \tau ^\prime $. In other words in this situation each type of brane is superconducting with respect to the [*other*]{} $U(1)$. Later we shall see a similar phenomenon arising in the case of extreme black holes in theories with two $U(1)$’s.
The example we have just given may be readily extended to the case of configurations of branes intersecting at angles discussed in [@GGPT].
So far we have not used the Einstein equations. To do so, we suppose that the Killing vector field $K$ is everywhere tangent to some submanifold $\cal B$ of $\cal E$. We may regard $K$ as a Killing field of $\cal B$. Of course $\cal B$ could be all of the spacetime manifold.
We now apply the Ricci identity to the Killing vector field $K$ to give $$\nabla _i F^{ij} = - R_{\cal B} ^{ij} K_j,$$ where $R_{\cal B} ^{ij}$ [^1] is the Ricci tensor of $\cal B$. Thus on $\cal B$ we have the London-like relation: $$J^i = 2R_{\cal B}^{ij} K_j.$$ Moreover $$\nabla ^2 K^i = - R_{\cal B}^{ij} K_j$$ As an example: suppose that the spacelike submanifold ${\cal B}$ is spacelike, compact and has negative Ricci curvature, then a simple integration by parts argument shows that $K$ must vanish everywhere on $\cal B$. If $\cal B$ is Ricci-flat then $K$ need not vanish but if it does not then it must be covariantly constant. This means that locally at least $\cal B$ is the metric product of a circle with a submanifold of one dimension less than that of $\cal B$.
The result we have just sketched is responsible for the well known fact that closed Einstein manifolds with negative cosmological constant do not admit any Killing fields. However we would like to view it in a a different way.
If $K$ vanishes on $\cal B$ then necessarily the restriction to $\cal B$ of $F=dK$ must also vanish. Thus the submanifold $\cal B$ might be said to exhibit a kind of Meissner effect. Because the mathematical theorem we are appealing to is a particular case of a Bochner vanishing theorem it seems appropriate to refer to this effect as the Bochner-Meissner effect.
We now turn to spacetimes with event horizons.
Clearly the brane is located somewhere in the vicinity of the horizon. For a generic non-dilatonic $p$-brane, the near horizon geometry is a standard compactification of the form $(adS)_{p+2} ~{\times}~ S^{{d_T}-1}$, where $d_T$ is the dimension of the transverse space [@gazpaul; @ght] (far from the brane the geometry is usually asymptotically flat, unless some global identification has been performed).
Now the metric on $(adS)_{p+2}$ may be written in so-called [*horospherical*]{} coordinates $(t, {\bf x}_{p}, z)$: $$\label{adshor}
ds^2 = \frac{1}{z^2}[-dt^2 + d{\bf x}_{p}d{\bf x}_{p} + dz^2]$$ These coordinates then provide a foliation of $(adS)_{p+2}$ by flat timelike hypersurfaces $z = $constant, which are called the ‘horospheres’. If one embeds $(adS)_{p+2}$ as a quadric in ${\Bbb E}^{p+1,2}$ then the horospheres are the intersection of the quadric with a family of null hyperplanes.
(The notation here reflects the fact that in the case of hyperbolic space $H^{p+2}$, which is the Euclidean section of adS, the analytic continuation of the constant $z$ slices of (\[adshor\]) are literally flat spheres, termed horospheres in the mathematics literature years ago. If one regards $H^{p+2}$ as the mass-shell in $p+3$-dimensional Minkowski spacetime ${\Bbb E}^{p+2,1}$ then horospheres are also the intersections of the quadric with a family of null hyperplanes).
Now each horosphere may be thought of as a static test test $p$-brane which solves the Dirac-Born-Infeld equations of motion of a $p$-brane coupled to the $p+1$ potential $A^{p+1}$ whose $p+2$ field strength $F^{p+2} =d A^{p+1}$ is proportional to the volume form of $(adS)_{p+2}$ [@CKKTP]. In this way we obtain a a particularly vivid picture of how the heavy supergravity brane is composed of many stacked light branes.
The limiting brane as $z\rightarrow 0$ corresponds to the causal boundary of $(adS)_{p+2}$. This conformal boundary has the topology of $S^{1} ~{\times}~ S^{p}$, where the $S^1$ is the timelike factor and the $S^p$ is spacelike. In fact the boundary coincides (possibly up to a discrete identification) with the conformal compactification of $p+1$ dimensional Minkowski space ${\Bbb E}^{p,1}$ and the isometry group $SO(p+1, 2)$ of $(adS)_{p+2}$ acts by conformal transformations on the boundary. Thus, one is led to study the singleton and doubleton representations [^2] of the group $SO(p+1, 2)$, in the hope of understanding the conformally invariant quantum field theory on the boundary. In fact, this boundary QFT has precisely the same degrees of freedom as the worldvolume fields of the corresponding $p$-brane. A natural proposal is then that the lowest scalar component of the boundary field theory represents the transverse fluctuations of the $p$-brane. Indeed, most recently it has been conjectured [@juan] that information about the dynamics of superconformal field theories (in the large $N$ limit) may be obtained by studying the region near the horizon of certain D(p)-branes. Thus, the conjecture implies a correspondence between gauge theories in the large $N$ limit and compactifications of supergravity theories. The correspondence is often called ‘holographic’ [@ed] because the superconformal field theory (SCFT) lives on the causal boundary of adS.
It is now natural to propose that a gravitating $p$-brane is ‘superconducting’ if the field theory on the boundary of the adS factor of the near-horizon geometry exhibits behaviour characteristic of a superconducting phase. Typically, given any specimen in a superconducting phase we expect to find zero modes, i.e., minimally coupled eigenmodes of some wave operator which correspond to the unimpeded movement of charge in the medium. Thus, we are led to look for zero modes which ‘skim along’ the horospheres in the adS factor.
From what we have said above, it is natural to look for such zero modes in the singleton (or doubleton) supermultiplets. After all, the singleton (or doubleton) field theories generically contain a number of massless scalar and spinor fields, which are trapped on the boundary of adS (the ‘core’ of the brane). (For an explicit discussion of the matter content of the superconformal multiplet of the M5-brane see e.g. [@ckvp]). The precise form of these multiplets is not important. What is important is that these massless modes skimming along the horosphere at infinity will naturally couple to any Kaluza-Klein currents on the brane. Put another way, if we wrap the brane on a circle (taking care to avoid any fixed-point singularities [@wrap]), then the massless fermions on the dimensionally reduced brane will naturally couple to the Kaluza-Klein charge - these modes will induce a superconducting current on the reduced brane.
We are thus led to a pleasing microscopic description of the superconducting properties of self-gravitating branes. Since the supercurrent seems to live right at the horizon of the brane, we would expect the horizon to display the Meissner effect. In the next few sections we will present a number of examples which confirm this effect for the horizons of extreme black holes. It would be interesting to perform similar tests for higher dimensional extremal self-gravitating branes.
Of course, all of this structure will break down for [*non*]{}-extreme black branes. As you approach the outer horizon, there is no splitting of the spacetime geometry into an adS factor and a compact factor. Furthermore, it is not possible to think of a non-extreme black brane as a stack of light branes, all hovering just outside of the horizon. We would not expect the outer horizon of a non-extreme brane to support a superconducting current, and therefore we would not expect such an object to display superconducting properties. These expectations are borne out when we consider non-extreme black holes. It is always possible to penetrate non-extreme black hole horizons with magnetic flux; superconductivity, it seems, is generically broken whenever we break extremality.
Meissner effect for superconducting strings {#strmeiss}
===========================================
In the previous sections we have seen that the worldvolume of $p$-branes behaves like a superconducting medium with respect to gauge fields of Kaluza-Klein origin. In particular, a form of the London equation appears which implies the possibility of stationary currents in the absence of an external electric field. Another consequence of these macroscopic equations is that magnetic fields vanish inside the worldvolume, i.e., the Meissner expulsion of magnetic fields. As a matter of fact, the magnetic fields have vanishing normal component to the worldvolume. Of course, in order for the magnetic field to be interpreted as a vector field, we must restrict ourselves to four spacetime dimensions.
When the effects of self-gravitation are included, it becomes less clear where the brane is localized. Thus, it is not so evident where the Meissner surface, where magnetic field expulsion takes place, should be located. The arguments in the previous section suggest that, at least for non-dilatonic branes this should be in the near-horizon $adS$ throat. Dilatonic branes are singular at the horizon, and the $adS$/SCFT correspondence becomes less clear, but the singular horizon (or the close vicinity of it) would be the natural place for the brane. In this and the following sections we will argue that the Meissner surface is always precisely at the horizon.
The reader may feel that there is an apparent conflation of objects of different dimensionalities here. Consider a string, which we will wrap on a circle in the Kaluza-Klein fashion. The worldvolume viewpoint of the previous sections would lead to the conclusion that the string carries a superconducting current along itself. In the reduced spacetime the string worldvolume will look like a point, and it does not make much sense to speak about the field being expelled from a point. However, when we include gravity in the picture, the string will develop a horizon, which (in $D=4$) will be seen as a 2-sphere (the fact that this might be singular will be dealt with later). Our claim is that magnetic Kaluza-Klein fields are expelled from the horizon.
Hence, our starting point is a string in $D=5$ which is wrapped to yield a black hole. The metric, in Einstein frame in $D=5$ is $$\label{gravstring}
ds^2= H^{-1/3}(-f dt^2 +dz^2)+H^{2/3}\left({dr^2\over f} +r^2d\theta^2
+r^2\sin^2\theta d\varphi^2\right),$$ where $$H=1+{q\over r},\qquad f=1-{r_0\over r}.$$ For $r_0\neq 0$ there is an event horizon at $r=r_0$. When $r_0=0$ the string is extremal.
If we compactify this geometry along the string direction $z$ we obtain a dilatonic black hole solution in $D=4$. In the previous sections we have seen that the string is superconducting with respect to the Kaluza-Klein gauge field ${\cal F}$ generated along this isometry [^3]. Our aim is to show that the horizon behaves as a Meissner surface for this field in the extremal limit.
There is an obvious point of concern when dealing with the extremal limit of the solution (\[gravstring\]): the proper size of the horizon is zero as measured in the Einstein frame. However, in four dimensions the gauge field equation is conformally invariant. This means that the field does not distinguish whether we are working in the Einstein, string, or any other conformal frame related to the one above by an overall rescaling of the metric by a factor of the dilaton. In particular, there exists a a frame, namely $H^{4/3} ds^2$, in which the metric does not become singular at the horizon. In this frame it makes perfect sense to consider whether the field penetrates or not the horizon.
There is a well-known procedure to generate, upon reduction, an exact solution with an axisymmetric magnetic Kaluza-Klein field (see, e.g., [@dilatonc] or [@dggh]). Instead of identifying points along the orbits of $\partial/\partial z$, we twist the compactification direction to be along orbits of $$\label{twistkk}
{\bf q} ={\partial\over \partial z} +B{\partial\over \partial \varphi}.$$ This is most easily done by changing to the adapted coordinate $\varphi
\rightarrow
\varphi-Bz$, such that ${\bf q}\varphi=0$. Here $B$ will be the asymptotic value of the magnetic field along the axis of the tube. The Kaluza-Klein gauge potential ${\cal A}_\mu$ reads, in terms of the original metric, $$\label{harkk}
{\cal A}={q_{\varphi}\over |{\bf q}|^2}d\varphi=B{g_{\varphi\varphi} \over
g_{zz}+B^2 g_{\varphi\varphi}}d\varphi.$$ This is clearly a conformally invariant expression. For the case under consideration, $$\label{melvstr}
{\cal A}=B{H r^2\sin^2\theta\over 1+B^2 H r^2\sin^2\theta}d\varphi.$$ We want to find the magnetic flux across a portion $\Sigma$ of the black hole horizon. This is given by the line integral $\int_{\partial \Sigma} {\cal A}$ on the horizon. If the horizon is at $r=r_0\neq 0$ then we find a non-vanishing flux across any portion of it. But in the extremal limit the horizon is at $r=0$, where ${\cal A}$ vanishes. So no magnetic flux penetrates the extremal horizon. The field is expelled from it: this is the Meissner effect. In Fig. \[fig:MeissMelv\] we have plotted the lines of force of the magnetic field for non-extreme and extreme configurations.
We would like to emphasize the fact that this analysis has been carried out at a level where the supergravitry equations have been treated in an exact form. In particular, the field (\[melvstr\]) is an exact field configuration in $D=4$ (together with the corresponding metric and string winding field).
Meissner effect in extremal black holes {#extrmeiss}
=======================================
It is remarkable that this Meissner effect is not unique of extremal geometries derived from $p$-branes. In fact, as we argue below, it appears to be a rather generic feature of extremal black holes. Typically, the lines of force of a magnetic field penetrate the horizon of a non-extremal black hole. However, we will see that the lines of force fail to penetrate extremal horizons. Instead, they tightly wrap the black hole. [*The horizon of an extremal black hole behaves like the surface of a perfectly diamagnetic object.*]{}
To be more precise, in a superconducting material the magnetic field penetrates to some small distance from the surface: this is the penetration depth. For extremal black holes the penetration depth appears to be zero. Also, the perfectly diamagnetic state of the black hole breaks down at any finite temperature, i.e., for any deviation from extremality.
To our knowledge, this phenomenon was first pointed out in the literature by Bič[á]{}k and Dvoř[á]{}k in [@bicak], in the context of Einstein-Maxwell theory. We believe this to be a generic phenomenon for black holes in theories with more complicated field content, although a precise specification of the dynamical situations where this effect is present seems to be out of reach. The results below constitute very strong evidence that it is true whenever the gauge field couples minimally to the geometry, or possibly includes dilatonic couplings.
Field expulsion from extremal rotating black hole {#walds}
-------------------------------------------------
A first example (also noticed in [@bicak]) of this Meissner effect follows from Wald’s analysis [@wald] of a test magnetic field in the background of the neutral Kerr black hole. In [@wald] a solution for a field aligned with the axis of the black hole is constructed, by using the isometries of the Kerr background. Let us denote the axial and temporal Killing vectors of the Kerr solution by $\psi \equiv
\partial /\partial\varphi$ and $\eta \equiv \partial /\partial t$. Then a test gauge field can be constructed as $${\cal A}_\mu= B\left( \psi_\mu + {2 J\over M}\eta_\mu \right) -{Q\over 2
M}\eta_\mu.$$ $B$ is the magnetic field along the axis, and $Q$ is the charge that the black hole acquires, which we want to be zero. The field can be conveniently written in terms of the vector $\chi =\Omega_H \psi +\eta$, which is tangent to the null geodesic generators of the horizon. Here $\Omega_H$ is the angular velocity of the horizon. We find (with $Q=0$), $${\cal A}_\mu= {B\over \Omega_H}\left[ \chi_\mu - \left(1-{2 \Omega_H J\over
M} \right)\eta_\mu\right].$$ In the extremal limit $2\Omega_H J=M$, and therefore ${\cal A}_\mu \propto
\chi_\mu$, which vanishes precisely at the horizon. As in the previous section, the flux along any portion $\Sigma$ of the horizon, $\int_{\partial
\Sigma}
{\cal A}$, vanishes. Again, the extremal horizon behaves like a perfect diamagnet.
This solution involved the magnetic field as a test field only. But it is possible to find an exact generalization of it within Kaluza-Klein theory. Start with the product of the (neutral) $D=4$ Kerr solution with a five dimensional direction $x^5$. We can now apply the ‘twisted reduction’ procedure described in Section \[strmeiss\] to put the $D=4$ neutral Kerr black hole in the background of an axisymmetric Kaluza-Klein magnetic field in an exact way. In order to avoid the presence of electric charge in the black hole, the compactification direction must also involve a twist in the time coordinate. Specifically, we identify points along orbits of the vector $${\bf q} = {\partial\over \partial x^5}+B\left( \psi + {2 J
\over M}\eta \right).$$ The [*exact*]{} Kaluza-Klein gauge field that follows is $${\cal A}_\mu =B{\psi_\mu + {2 J \over M}\eta_\mu \over |{\bf q}|^2},$$ which reduces to Wald’s field in the linear approximation, and in the same way can be seen to exhibit the Meissner effect in the extremal limit. The reader may have noticed that Wald’s solution does not contain any dilaton field, whereas the Kaluza-Klein solution does. But to linearized order in the test gauge field there is no contribution from a test dilaton (see, e.g., eqn. (\[testsc\]) below). Therefore Wald’s solution is the linear approximation to the axial field configuration for [*all*]{} Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton theories [^4].
Finally, in the solutions we have been considering the magnetic field is aligned with the rotation axis of the black hole. According to [@bicak], the Meissner expulsion can also be seen for fields where no alignment is assumed.
Field expulsion from spherically symmetric extremal throats {#nrthroats}
-----------------------------------------------------------
Now we would like to consider other classes of extremal black holes, and the most obvious candidates are charged (Reissner-Nordstrom) black holes. However, several subtleties arise that need to be dealt with care. Consider, as the simplest example that comes to one’s mind, an electrically charged Reissner-Nordstrom black hole in the background of a magnetic field. This configuration was analyzed, in an exact way, in [@ernst]. Naively, according to our conjecture the magnetic field should be expelled from the horizon in the extremal limit in this configuration. However, this does not happen. The puzzle is solved [@bicak] when one notices that the solution in [@ernst] is actually [*rotating.*]{} A rotating electric charge generates a magnetic dipole moment. The black hole is therefore the source of a magnetic dipolar field. This is actually the field across the extremal horizon of the solution in [@ernst][^5]. The authors of [@bicak] then went on to construct a linearized solution where the rotation of the charged black hole in the external field could be set to zero, and found it exhibited the Meissner expulsion of the field in the extremal limit.
In this example, the complication arises due to gravitationally induced non-linear interactions between the electric field of the black hole and the external magnetic field. However, notice that our main reason to have a charge on the black hole is to provide a means to reach the extremal limit. In other words, we are not particularly interested in the dynamical aspects associated to the charge of the black hole. Rather, we want to isolate the behavior of the magnetic field in the [*gravitational*]{} field created by the black hole. As a way to disentangle the effect of the charge of the black hole from that of the magnetic field, we can think of the charge of the black hole as being coupled to a gauge field that is different from the external magnetic gauge field. In other words, we work with a $U(1)\times U(1)$ gauge theory, with two Maxwell fields. The black hole will be charged with respect to one of the $U(1)$ fields, while the other gauge field will be the magnetic field that experiences the Meissner effect. This introduction of a second gauge field may seem unrealistic, but we should view it as simply a device that provides us with a way to achieve extremality for the black hole. In particular, it will be clear in our analysis below that the dynamics of the gauge field associated to the charge of the black hole play no essential role. Besides, theories with more than one gauge field arise quite naturally in string theory and related contexts.
We will start our analysis by treating the magnetic field as a test field in the background of the black hole geometry. Therefore, we want to solve the equation $$\label{testf}
\partial_\mu (\sqrt{-g} {\cal F}^{\mu\nu})=0,$$ in some fixed background geometry $g_{\mu\nu}$.
For starters, take the Reissner-Nordstrom metric, $$\begin{aligned}
ds^2 &=& -V dt^2 + V^{-1} dr^2 +r^2 (d\theta^2 +\sin^2\theta d\varphi^2),\\
V &=& 1-{2 M\over r} + {Q^2\over r^2}.\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ The outer (event) horizon is at $r=r_h=M+\sqrt{M^2-Q^2}$, and extremality is achieved by setting $Q=M$.
For the test field ${\cal F}=d{\cal A}$ we will assume the ansatz $$\label{Aansatz}
{\cal A} = f(r) \sin^2\theta\; d\varphi,$$ in terms of which the magnetic flux crossing any surface $\Sigma$ is given by $\int_{\partial \Sigma} {\cal A}$.
With the ansatz (\[Aansatz\]), the field equation (\[testf\]) becomes $${d\over d r}\left( V{d f\over d r}\right) =
{2 f\over r^2}.$$ This is easily solved as $$f(r) = r^2 -Q^2,$$ up to a multiplicative constant, related to the value of the magnetic field at infinity, which we have arbitrarily fixed. According to (\[Aansatz\]), the magnetic flux crossing the horizon is proportional to $f(r_h)$. This is nonzero for black holes with $M>Q$, but [*it vanishes precisely in the extremal limit $r_h = Q$.*]{}
Now, we want to consider non-rotating extremal black holes in more generality. In order to simplify the analysis, we will focus only on the region near the horizon of the black hole, since it is there where the Meissner effect is exhibited. As the most generic characterization of this region for spherically symmetric extremal black holes, we will take the following:
- For some choice of conformal frame, the region near the extremal horizon becomes asymptotically an infinite throat of constant radius. This is, if we choose the horizon to be at $r=0$, then $$\label{exthroat}
ds^2 \simeq -\left( {r\over \ell}\right)^{4\alpha} dt^2+
\ell^2\left[ {dr^2\over r^2} + d\theta^2 + \sin^2\theta d\varphi^2
\right].$$
The freedom in choosing coordinates has been used to simplify the possible forms of the metric and bring the horizon to $r=0$. The parameter $\ell$ fixes the scale of the geometry (and is tipically related to the charge and mass of the black hole). The exponent $\alpha$ is an arbitrary real number. Within this class we find, for example, the extremal dilatonic black holes of [@gm], or the stringy black holes in [@cvetyoum2].
As in Section \[strmeiss\], the reference to the conformal frame is motivated by the fact that, in the presence of scalar (dilaton) fields, when we write the metric in canonical Einstein frame, the throat at $r=0$ typically pinches down to zero size in a singular way. But then we can use the dilaton to perform a conformal rescaling of the metric to yield the regular throat (\[exthroat\]). Since the Maxwell field equation (\[testf\]) is, in four dimensions, invariant under such conformal rescalings, we are allowed to choose to work in the conformal gauge fixed by (\[exthroat\]). In fact, we may want to consider an equation slightly more general than (\[testf\]), $$\label{testfd}
\partial_\mu (\sqrt{-g} e^{-a\phi} {\cal F}^{\mu\nu})=0,$$ where we allow for a coupling of the test field to a dilatonic field $\phi$ with non-constant background value near the horizon, $r\simeq 0$, $$e^{-a\phi} \simeq B\left({\ell\over r}\right)^{2\beta}.$$
As a further minor generalization, we could consider the test gauge field to be coupled to a [*test*]{} scalar $\sigma$, with the standard action (we suppress inessential factors), $$\label{testsc}
I \sim \int (\partial \sigma)^2 + e^{-\sigma} {\cal F}^2.$$ However, the field equation for $\sigma$ implies that if ${\cal F}$ is linear in the (small) applied magnetic field, then $\sigma$ only enters at quadratic order and is therefore negligible in the approximation we are working. Hence we need not consider explicitly such scalars.
In order to solve (\[testfd\]), we consider again the ansatz (\[Aansatz\]) for the magnetic field, and we find the equation $${d\over dr}\left(r^{2(\alpha-\beta) +1} f'\right) =
2 r^{2(\alpha-\beta)-1} f.$$ This is a homogeneous equation, which we can solve by choosing (up to a multiplicative constant), $$\label{ggam}
f(r) = r^\gamma,$$ with $$\label{gammasol}
\gamma = \sqrt{(\beta -\alpha)^2 + 2} +\beta-\alpha >0.$$ What is important here is that $\gamma$ is never zero. Since the flux crossing the horizon is proportional to $f(r=0)$, in order to have a finite, non-vanishing flux we should have $\gamma =0$. Instead, we find that the flux always vanishes at the horizon $r=0$ [^6]. The Meissner effect, therefore, is a common characteristic of extremal throats. For completeness, we show in Appendix \[nonmeiss\] that the Meissner effect does never take place on non-extremal horizons.
Finally, notice that in order to solve the equations and exhibit the Meissner effect we have only needed the metric of the black hole solution. That is, the fact that we may need the black hole to be charged for it to be extremal, plays no essential role. Besides this, we have assumed that the interactions of the gauge field ${\cal F}$ are essentially given by (\[testfd\]). More complicated situations could be envisaged, but from the evidence we have presented here we believe that the phenomenon is generic. If other couplings of the field ${\cal F}$ were considered, care should be exercised to ensure that the additional interactions do not indirectly generate source terms for the field ${\cal F}$, which would produce an outgoing flux of the field across the horizon. These cases, of course, cannot be used to disprove our conjecture, which clearly requires absence of magnetic sources inside the black hole. A subtle example of how flux can penetrate a horizon of the type (\[exthroat\]), if the theory contains Chern-Simons couplings involving the field ${\cal F}$, is discussed in Appendix \[nonsuc\].
Some further exact solutions {#exactsols}
----------------------------
In the previous subsection we have found evidence that magnetic fields are expelled from the horizon of spherically symmetric extremal black holes. However, the magnetic field has been treated as a test field, and its effect on the geometry of the black hole has been neglected. One could worry that, if the backreaction effect of the magnetic field on the geometry were accounted for, the behavior of the horizon might change and the magnetic field would perhaps penetrate into the black hole, thereby evading the Meissner effect. This, however, is rather unlikely: the fact that the magnetic field vanishes near the horizon leads us to expect a negligible backreaction in that region. This expectation is confirmed in all cases where exact solutions have been constructed.
We have already presented two exact solutions, in Sections \[strmeiss\] and \[walds\], using the Kaluza-Klein ansatz, where we have introduced an axisymmetric magnetic field which exhibits Meissner expulsion. Similar exact fields can be introduced, for different values of the dilaton coupling, by applying ‘Harrison-like’ [@harrison] solution-generating transformations [@dilatonc; @ross; @yo] (dilatonic Melvin flux tubes were discussed in [@gm]). In particular, the behavior of black holes in magnetic fields, for essentially any value $a>0$ of the dilaton coupling, can be readily analyzed using the solutions in [@yo]. We will not give any details, but in all such cases the Meissner effect can be seen to be present as well. Here we will display another sort of magnetic fields that can, in a sense, be considered as a curved space generalizations of the uniform magnetic field in flat space. These are the covariantly constant fields, exemplified by the Bertotti-Robinson solution of Einstein-Maxwell theory. There do exist generalizations of such solutions for the $U(1)^2$ theory of [@klop], or the $U(1)^n$ theories in [@yo].
One should be careful, however, in constructing the solutions. The field in the Bertotti-Robinson solution is spherically symmetric, and ‘emanates’ from an origin, which nevertheless is non-singular since the geometry develops an infinite throat. In the analogous dilatonic solutions, the field similarly emanates from an origin, which now is singular in Einstein frame. In any case, our point here is that, if we want the extremal black hole to expel the field, then it is clear that the ‘source’ should not be [*inside*]{} the black hole. In other words, the Bertotti-Robinson-like field and the black hole must [*not*]{} be concentric.
With this proviso, the theory we will consider will be [@klop] $$\label{u12}
I=\int d^4 x \sqrt{-g} \left[
R-{1\over 2}(\partial \phi)^2 -{e^{-\phi}\over 2} {\cal F}^2
-{e^\phi\over 2} G^2
\right],$$ and the solution we are interested in is, in Einstein conformal gauge, $$\begin{aligned}
\label{bhbr}
ds^2 &=& -{1\over \Delta_{\cal F}\Delta_G}dt^2 +
\Delta_{\cal F}\Delta_G (dr^2 +
r^2d\theta^2 +r^2\sin^2\theta d\varphi^2),\nonumber
\\
{\cal F}&=&d{\cal A},\quad {\cal A} =b {r\cos\theta-\ell\over
r_2}d\varphi,\qquad G =
q \sin\theta d\theta \wedge d\varphi,
\\
e^{\phi} &=& {\Delta_G\over\Delta_{\cal F}},\quad \Delta_G = 1 +{q\over
r},\qquad \Delta_{\cal F} = {b\over r_2},
\nonumber\\
r_2&\equiv &\sqrt{r^2 +l^2 -2lr\cos\theta}.\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ In this form of the solution, both fields are of magnetic type. The black hole is extremal from the outset, with horizon at $r=0$ and charge $q$. The ‘origin’ of the magnetic ${\cal F}$ field is at a coordinate distance $l$ along the axis $\theta=0$, i.e., at $r_2=0$. Setting $q=0$ yields a geometry that is conformally equivalent to the product of the linear dilaton vacuum of $D=2$ string theory with a sphere $S^2$, and a covariantly constant field ${\cal F}$. The degenerate horizon at $r0=0$ is singular. The proper size of the extremal black hole is zero if measured in the Einstein metric. However, as discussed in previous sections, for the purpose of studying the gauge fields we could just as well work in a conformally related metric where the extremal horizon is non-singular. The ‘preferred’ frame is $e^{\phi}
ds^2$, in which the extremal black hole area is equal to $4\pi q^2$.
Once again, the exact value of the flux across constant $r$ surfaces, given by $$\label{bhbrf}
{\cal F}_{\theta\varphi} =
b\sin\theta{r^2(r-l\cos\theta)\over r_2^3}$$ vanishes at the horizon of the black hole, $r=0$, as we claimed. The lines of force for the field ${\cal F}$ are plotted in Fig. \[fig:MeissBR\].
With little extra effort we can consider a slightly different situation, where we have two extremal black holes, each with charge coupled to different gauge fields. As before, if we do not want to find a trivial penetration of flux, we have to consider a two-center solution.
We can analyze in this way whether the field created by the black hole with charge $q_2$ in ${\cal F}$ penetrates the horizon of the black hole with charge $q$. The solution is just like (\[bhbr\]) above, but now with $$\Delta_{\cal F} = 1 +{ q_2\over r_2}.$$ The horizon of this second black hole is at $r_2=0$. The field created by it is exactly the same as in the previous example, (\[bhbrf\]), only changing $b\rightarrow q_2$. Thus we find another exact solution exhibiting the Meissner effect at the extremal horizon at $r=0$. Evidently, by symmetry, the flux created by the black hole with charge $q$ does not penetrate the horizon, at $r_2=0$, of the other extremal black hole.
In these examples the black hole under study has been the “$a=1$ dilatonic black hole.” In terms of the test field analysis performed in the previous subsection, the relevant parameters are $\alpha=0$, $\beta =1/2$, which yield $\gamma = 2$ for (\[ggam\]). This is in precise agreement with the expansion for small $B$ (and $r$) of the exact result (\[bhbrf\]). Different values of the dilaton coupling (essentially, any value $a>0$) can be readily analyzed using the solutions in [@yo], with no qualitative differences.
Conclusions
===========
Superconductivity is a rich and multifaceted subject, with applications in a variety of physical models, from condensed matter physics to QCD. It is therefore natural to investigate how superconducting phenomena may emerge from the rich structure described by M-theory; after all, M-theory is our only real candidate for a unified description of all physical phenomena.
In this paper, we have described the superconducting phases of the solitonic objects of M-theory, the $p$-branes. In order to perform such a description, we have concentrated on three of the most elementary and well known aspects of superconducting media: The Meissner effect, the London theory and the existence of minimally coupled zero modes.
With respect to the Meissner effect, we have presented a number of exact solutions which demonstrate that Kaluza-Klein magnetic flux is expelled from the horizon of a generic extreme black hole. We have extended this analysis to the case of a black string in $D=5$, and again found that Kaluza-Klein flux is expelled. It would be interesting to perform similar tests for the Meissner effect for higher-dimensional extreme branes. It would also be interesting if we could understand [*precisely*]{} when and how the Meissner effect is broken.
Strictly speaking, the Meissner effect follows from the fact that inside a superconductor the field has to be pure gauge. This, however, is not true for the field in the interior of the extremal black hole, as can be readily seen from the examples above. We are not claiming, therefore, that the black hole interior is in a superconducting state. Our statements refer to the horizon, or at most to the near-horizon region.
Of course, the Meissner effect is just one property exhibited by superconducting media; ultimately, we want to construct a phenomenological model which attempts to describe what is going on. The theory of London goes beyond the simple [*observation*]{} of the Meissner effect, and proposes a set of field equations which imply various things about the microscopic theory which underlies the entire phenomenon. Thus, in order to have a macroscopic phenomenological description of a superconducting $p$-brane, we have followed Nielsen, Balachandran and others by proposing that a $p$-brane is in a superconducting phase if and only if the relativistic London equation holds on the worldvolume of the brane. For a test brane, this definition is not ambiguous since it is clear where the brane is located, i.e., the brane is just some extended object moving in a background spacetime, from which it has decoupled. The motivation for our definition is then clear, since the London equation will hold on the worldvolume of any extended object which is carrying Kaluza-Klein currents. For self-gravitating branes, we have proposed that a brane is in a superconducting phase if and only if this ‘Nielsen’ type condition holds on the boundary of the adS factor of the near-horizon geometry of the brane.
Given all of this structure, it is then natural to propose that the microscopic degrees of freedom which lead to $p$-brane superconductivity are precisely the zero modes, associated with the singleton superconformal multiplets, which propagate on the boundary of the adS factor of the near-horizon geometry. These zero modes naturally couple to any Kaluza-Klein currents, and so they literally represent the unimpeded flow of charge far down the throat of a self-gravitating brane.
Of course, in this analysis we have neglected a number of other theories and approaches to superconductivity. It would be interesting to investigate whether or not it is possible to define $p$-brane superconductivity using the ideas of these other theories. Research on these and related problems is currently underway.
AC is supported by Pembroke College, Cambridge. RE has been partially supported by EPSRC through grant GR/L38158 (UK), and by UPV through grant 063.310-EB225/95 (Spain).
Absence of Meissner effect in non-extremal horizons {#nonmeiss}
===================================================
In order to complete our general analysis of [*test*]{} magnetic fields in the vicinity of spherically symmetric black holes, here we solve the equations in the presence of non-extremal horizons. In this case, close enough to the horizon the geometry is of the Rindler form $$ds^2 = -\rho^2 d\tau^2 + d\rho^2 + R^2(d\theta^2 +\sin\theta^2 d\varphi^2).$$ $R$ is a constant measuring the radius of the horizon, which is at $\rho=0$. We now solve the equation (\[testf\]) for a test Maxwell field in this background using the same ansatz (\[Aansatz\]) [^7]. The solution $${\cal A}= I_0\left( {\sqrt{2}\rho \over R} \right) \sin^2\theta d\varphi,$$ is expressed in terms of the Bessel function of order zero, such that $I_0(0)=
1$, i.e., there is a non-vanishing flux crossing any portion of the horizon. There is no Meissner expulsion from non-extremal horizons.
A ‘counterexample’ to the Meissner effect, and its resolution {#nonsuc}
=============================================================
Consider the five-dimensional action $$I_5 = \int d^5 x \sqrt{-\hat g} \left\{\hat R - {1\over 2} (\hat\partial
\phi)^2 -{1\over 12} e^{-\sqrt{2/3}\phi}\hat H^2 -{1\over 4}
e^{+\sqrt{2/3}\phi}\hat F^2 \right\}.$$ Five dimensional quantities will be hatted. $\hat H$ and $\hat F$ are 3-form and 2-form field strengths, obtainable from 2- and 1-form potentials $\hat B,\hat A$, $\hat H = d\hat B$, $\hat F = d\hat A$. Very similar (but not exactly the same) actions can be derived from compactified string/M-theory. The fields $\hat H$ and $\hat F$ admit the interpretation of fields with string and particle sources. Actually, the solution we discuss below can be seen as a bound state (at threshold) of a string and a particle.
The equations of motion of this theory admit the solution $$\begin{aligned}
d\hat s^2 &=& -{dt^2\over \Delta^2} + \Delta^2(dr^2 +r^2 d\Omega_2^2)
+ dx_5^2,\\
\Delta &=& 1+{q\over r},\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ $$\hat B = \Delta^{-1}dt \wedge dx_5,\qquad \hat A = \Delta^{-1}dt.$$ The scalar $\phi$ is zero (or constant) for this solution [^8]. The metric is precisely equal to the product of the $D=4$ extremal, electric Reissner-Nordstrom black hole with the real line $-\infty <x_5 <\infty$. Hence, Kaluza-Klein reduction along $x_5$ yields the extremal RN black hole, with no electromagnetic Kaluza-Klein field.
We can now generate a background Melvin flux tube by performing a Kaluza-Klein reduction as described in Section \[strmeiss\]: change the polar variable to $\varphi \rightarrow\varphi - B x_5$, and reduce to $D=4$ by consistently identifying points along $x_5$. The Kaluza-Klein gauge potential is $${\cal A} = B{\Delta^2 r^2 \sin^2\theta\over 1+B^2\Delta^2 r^2
\sin^2\theta}d\varphi.$$ This does [*not*]{} vanish on the extremal horizon $r=0$. The Meissner effect is not present for this solution. Nevertheless, the geometry near the horizon is of the form required in (\[exthroat\]).
The resolution of this puzzle comes from examining the actual couplings of the Kaluza-Klein gauge field ${\cal A}$ in the effective $D=4$ theory. For details of the reduction procedure, see, e.g., [@stelle]. The important point here is that the non-vanishing component of the field $\hat
B$ along $x_5$, $\hat B_{\mu 5}\equiv B_\mu$, yields a Chern-Simons-like coupling in the $D=4$ action of the form $$(d B\wedge {\cal A})^2$$ (times factors involving the scalar $\phi$ and Kaluza-Klein scalar, which are inessential for this discussion). The consequence is that the effective equation for ${\cal F}$ in $D=4$ differs now from (\[testfd\]) by the presence of an extra source term. In this indirect way, the $\hat H$-charge of the black hole is responsible for the appearance of an induced magnetic dipole for the black hole in the presence of an external field ${\cal F}$. This is the source of the flux coming out of the horizon. This is, in a way, similar to absence of Meissner effect in the solutions considered in [@ernst], in that subtle non-linear interactions induce dipolar sources for the black hole.
This extra term is also present in the compactification of the string that we analyzed in Section \[strmeiss\]. However, in that case its value in the extremal limit is zero, so it does not spoil the Meissner effect.
[99]{}
R. M. Wald, [*Black hole in a uniform magnetic field*]{}, Phys. Rev. D[**10**]{} (1974) 1680.
A.R. King, J.P. Lasota, and W. Kundt, [*Black holes and magnetic fields,*]{} Phys. Rev. D[**12**]{}, 3037 (1975).
F.J. Ernst, [*Black holes in a magnetic universe*]{}, Jour. of Math. Physics, 17, (1976) 54.
F.J. Ernst and W.J. Wild, [*Kerr black holes in a magnetic universe*]{}, Jour. of Math. Physics, 17, (1976) 182.
J. Bič[á]{}k and L. Dvoř[á]{}k, [*Stationary electromagnetic fields around black holes. III. General solutions and the fields of current loops near the Reissner-Nordstrom black hole*]{}, Phys. Rev. D[**22**]{} (1980) 2933.
A. Chamblin, J.M.A. Ashbourn-Chamblin, R. Emparan, and A. Sornborger, [*Absence of Abelian-Higgs hair for extreme black holes*]{}, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**80**]{}, 4378 (1998) (gr-qc/9706032); [*Can extreme black holes have (long) Abelian Higgs hair?,*]{} gr-qc/9706004.
N.K. Nielsen, [*Dimensional reduction and classical strings*]{}, Nucl. Phys. [**B167**]{}, 149 (1980).
N.K. Nielsen and P. Olesen, [*Dynamical properties of superconducting cosmic strings*]{}, Nucl. Phys. [**B291**]{}, 829-846 (1987).
A.P. Balachandran, B.S. Skagerstam, and A. Stern, [*Gauge theory of extended objects*]{}, Phys. Rev. D[**20**]{}, 439, (1979).
E. Witten, [*Superconducting strings,*]{} Nucl. Phys. [ **B249**]{}, 557 (1985).
G. W. Gibbons, [*Born-Infeld particles and Dirichlet $p$-branes*]{}, Nucl. Phys. [**B514**]{}, 603, (1998) (hep-th/9709027); C. G. Callan, Jr. and J. M. Maldacena, [*Brane Dynamics From the Born-Infeld Action*]{}, Nucl. Phys. [**B513**]{}, 198 (1998) (hep-th/9708147).
J.P. Gauntlett, G.W. Gibbons, G. Papadopoulos and P.K. Townsend, [*Hyper-Kahler manifolds and multiply intersecting branes*]{}, Nucl. Phys. [**B 500**]{}, 133, (1997) (hep-th/9702202).
G.W. Gibbons and P.K. Townsend, [*Vacuum interpolation in supergravity via super $p$-branes*]{}, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**71**]{}, No. 23, 3754 (1993).
G. W. Gibbons, G. T. Horowitz, and P. K. Townsend, [*Higher dimensional resolution of dilatonic black hole singularities*]{}, Class. Quant. Grav. [**12**]{} (1995) 297 (hep-th/9410073).
P. Claus, R. Kallosh, J. Kumar, P.K. Townsend, and A. Van Proeyen, [*Conformal Theory of M2, D3, M5 and ’D1+D5’ branes,*]{} hep-th/9801206
J.M. Maldacena, [*The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity*]{}, hep-th/9711200.
E. Witten, [*Anti-de Sitter space and Holography*]{}, hep-th/9802150.
P. Claus, R. Kallosh and A. Van Proeyen, [*M5-brane and superconformal (0,2) tensor multiplet in 6 dimensions*]{}, Nucl. Phys. [**B 518**]{}: 117-150, (1998) (hep-th/9711161).
G.W. Gibbons, [*Wrapping branes in space and time*]{}, hep-th/9803206.
F. Dowker, J.P. Gauntlett, D. Kastor and J. Traschen, [*Pair creation of dilaton black holes*]{}, Phys. Rev. D[**49**]{} (1994) 2909 (hep-th/9309075).
H. F. Dowker, J. P. Gauntlett, G. W. Gibbons, and G. T. Horowitz, [*Nucleation of $p$-branes and fundamental strings*]{}, Phys. Rev. D[**53**]{} (1996) 7115 (hep-th/9512154).
G. W. Gibbons and K. Maeda, [*Black holes and membranes in higher-dimensional theories with dilaton fields,*]{} Nucl. Phys. [**B298**]{} (1988) 741.
M. Cvetic and D. Youm, [*Dyonic BPS saturated black holes of heterotic string on a six-torus*]{}, Phys. Rev. D[**53**]{} (1996) 584 (hep-th/9507090); [*BPS saturated and non-extreme states in abelian Kaluza-Klein theory and effective $N=4$ supersymmetric string vacua*]{}, (hep-th/9508058).
B. K. Harrison, J. Math. Phys. [**9**]{} (1968) 1744.
S.F. Ross, [*Pair production of black holes in a $U(1)\otimes U(1)$ theory*]{}, Phys. Rev. D[**49**]{} (1994) 6599 (hep-th/9401131).
R. Emparan, [*Composite black holes in external fields*]{}, Nucl. Phys. [**B490**]{} (1997) 365 (hep-th/9610170).
R. Kallosh, A. Linde, T. Ort[í]{}n, A. Peet and A. Van Proeyen, [*Supersymmetry as a cosmic censor*]{}, Phys. Rev. D[**46**]{} (1992) 5278 (hep-th/9205027).
K. Stelle, [*BPS branes in supergravity,*]{} hep-th/9803116.
[^1]: Our conventions are that the signature is $(- + + ... +)$, and that the sign of the curvature is given by $({\nabla}_{i}{\nabla}_{j} - {\nabla}_{j}{\nabla}_{i})K^{m} =
{R_{nij}}^{m}K^{n}$.
[^2]: Singleton representations of the adS group require a [*single*]{} set of oscillators transforming under the fundamental representation of the maximal compact subgroup of the covering group of the adS group; doubletons require two such sets of oscillators.
[^3]: In order to avoid confusion with other gauge fields that may appear, throughout this and the following sections we will consistently use caligraphic letters for the field ${\cal
F}$ that experiences the Meissner expulsion and its potential ${\cal A}$.
[^4]: Actually, the Kaluza-Klein perspective provides a simple way to rederive, by linearization in the gauge field, the general technique used in [@wald] to construct solutions for test Maxwell fields in backgrounds with isometries.
[^5]: It is even clearer that, for similar reasons, we should not expect the extremal Kerr-Newman black hole, which has a magnetic dipole by itself, to expel the magnetic field [@ew].
[^6]: The solutions with $\gamma <0$ have been discarded as pathological.
[^7]: We could also have included scalar fields, as in (\[testfd\]), but these typically take finite, non-zero values on non-extremal horizons and do not alter the results.
[^8]: It would be easy to construct a more general solution with different harmonic functions $\Delta_F,\Delta_H$ for the particle and string, that would yield non-constant $\phi$, but we prefer to keep things simpler at this level.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'In this paper we consider a set $E\subset{\Omega}$ with prescribed mean curvature $f\in C({\Omega})$ and Euclidean Lipschitz boundary $\partial E={\Sigma}$ inside a three-dimensional contact sub-Riemannian manifold $M$. We prove that if ${\Sigma}$ is locally a regular intrinsic graph, the characteristic curves are of class $C^2$. The result is shape and improves the ones contained in [@MR2583494] and [@GalRit15].'
address: |
Dipartimento di Matematica\
Università di Bologna\
Piazza di Porta S. Donato 5\
40126 Bologna, Italy
author:
- Matteo Galli
bibliography:
- 'lipschitz.bib'
title: |
The regularity of Euclidean Lipschitz boundaries with prescribed\
mean curvature in three-dimensional contact\
sub-Riemannian manifolds
---
[^1]
Introduction
============
The study of the sub-Riemannian area minimizers start with the seminal paper [@MR1404326], where general properties and existence of sets with minimum perimeter are proved in Carnot groups. In the last two decades many effort are been devoted to the develop of an exhaustive theory for minimal surfaces in the sub-Riemannian setting. One of the main difficulties related with this propose is to provide a regularity theory for critical points of the sub-Riemannian area functional. Nowadays in sub-Riemannian geometry the optimal regularity of critical points of the area is not clear. More precisely, there are only partial results under some assumptions on the regularity of the area-stationary surfaces themselves. Many author focused their attention on the study of minimal $C^2$ surfaces or isoperimetric sets with $C^2$ boundary, see [@MR2354992], [@MR2648078], [@MR2472175], [@MR2333095], [@MR2455341], [@MR2435652], [@MR2609016], [@MR2165405] and [@MR2043961], among others. A very clear introduction on this first results is presented in the monograph [@MR2312336].
The first examples of non-smooth solutions of the Plateau problem with smooth boundary datum in a regular domain are constructed in [@MR2225631]. Later on, in [@MR2262784] and [@MR2448649], the authors find examples of entire graphs over the $xy$-plane, the so called $t$-graphs, that are area-minimizers and Euclidean Lipschitz. On the other hand, we stress that these examples are not ${{\mathbb{H}}}$-regular graphs in the sense of [@MR1871966] and are smooth in their regular part. Another remarkable result is the existence of a non-entire Euclidean Lipschitz ${{\mathbb{H}}}$-regular graph that is a global minimizers on a strip, [@MR2333095 Example 2.8].
In [@MR2262784] and [@MR2481053] it is studied the existence and the regularity of $C^1$ $t$-graphs in ${{\mathbb{H}}}^n$ that are critical points of the functional $$\label{eq:F}
\mathcal{F}(u)=\int_{\Omega}|\nabla u+\vec{F}|+\int_{\Omega}fu,$$ on a domain ${\Omega}\subset{{\mathbb{R}}}^{2n}$, where $\vec{F}$ is a vector field and $f\in L^\infty({\Omega})$. When $\vec{F}(x,y)=(-y,x)$, the integral $\int_{\Omega}|\nabla u+\vec{F}|$ is the sub-Riemannian area of the graph over the domain ${\Omega}$ in the $xy$-plane. Among several interesting results, they prove in [@MR2481053 Thm. A] that, in case $n=1$, $u\in C^1({\Omega})$ is an stationary point of $\mathcal{F}$ and $f\in C^0({\Omega})$, the characteristic curves are of class $C^2$.
Theorem A in [@MR2481053] is well-known for $C^2$ minimizers and generalizes a previous result by Pauls [@MR2225631 Lemma 3.3] for $H$-minimal surfaces with components of the horizontal Gauss map in the class $W^{1,1}$. For an explication of what horizontal means we refer to Definition \[def:horizontal\].
In [@MR2583494] the authors consider a Euclidean Lipschitz minimal intrinsic graph of a function $u$ over a domain ${\Omega}$ inside a vertical plane. Under the assumption that $u$ is a vanishing viscosity minimal graphs (it means that there exists a family $\{u_j\}_{j\in {{\mathbb{N}}}}$ of smooth functions $u_j:{\Omega}\rightarrow {{\mathbb{R}}}$ converging uniformly to $u$ on compact subsets of ${\Omega}$ and such that the graph of $u_j$ is a Riemannian minimal surface), they prove an intrinsic $C_{{\mathbb{H}}}^{1,\alpha}$ regularity for the graph of $u$. As a consequence they obtain that the graph of $u$ is foliated by horizontal smooth parabolas.
Very recently, in [@GalRit15] the authors consider the sub-Riemannian prescribed mean curvature functional $$\label{eq:JOm}
\mathcal{J}(E,B)=P(E,B)+\int_{E\cap B} f,$$ where $E$ is a set of locally finite sub-Riemannian perimeter in ${\Omega}$, $P(E,B)$ is the relative sub-Riemannian perimeter of $E$ in a bounded open set $B\subset{\Omega}$, and $f\in L^\infty({\Omega})$. If $E\subset{{\mathbb{H}}}^n$ is the subgraph of a function $t=u(x,y)$ in the Heisenberg group ${{\mathbb{H}}}^n$, then $\mathcal{J}(E)$ coincides with taking $\vec{F}(x,y)=(-y,x)$. In [@GalRit15], see also [@gr-aim], they prove that an intrinsic graph of a $C^1$ function that is a critical point of the prescribed mean curvature functional is foliated by smooth curves in a 3-dimensional contact manifold. Such curves, usually called characteristic curves, are straight lines in ${{\mathbb{H}}}^1$, recovering the result first presented in [@MR2165405] and [@MR2481053].
The aim of this paper is to refine the argument in [@GalRit15] to prove a results in the spirit of [@MR2583494; @MR2831583] without no assumption on the existence of a sequence of smooth minimal Riemannian graphs approximating the initial sub-Riemannian minimal surface. We shall prove in Theorem \[th:main\]
> Let $M$ be a $3$-dimensional contact sub-Riemannian manifold, ${\Omega}\subset M$ a domain, and $E\subset{\Omega}$ a set of prescribed mean curvature $f\in C({\Omega})$ with Euclidean Lipschitz boundary $\partial E={\Sigma}$. If ${\Sigma}$ is locally a Lipschitz regular graph, then the characteristic curves are of class $C^2$.
The regularity of characteristic curves provided in Theorem \[th:main\] allows us to define in Section \[sec:mc\] a mean curvature function $H$ in the regular part of ${\partial}E$, that coincides with $f$. As a consequence of the definition of the mean curvature, we shall prove in Proposition \[prop:C\^k\] that characteristic curves are of class $C^{k+2}$ in case $f$ is of class $C^k$ when restricted to a characteristic direction. Furthermore we shall characterize the equation of characteristic curves in Proposition \[prop:foliazionepergeodesiche\]
> Let $E\subset{\Omega}$ be a set of prescribed mean curvature $f\in C(\Omega)$ with Lipschitz boundary ${\Sigma}$ in a domain ${\Omega}\subset M$. Then the characteristic curves in ${\Sigma}-{\Sigma}_0$ are ${\nabla}\text{-geodesics}$ of curvature $H$, where $H$ is the mean curvature function and ${\nabla}$ the pseudo-hermitian connection.
We remark that ${\nabla}\text{-geodesics}$ are not in general sub-Riemannian geodesics, see Remark \[rem:geodeticheaconfronto\], and examples of area-stationary surfaces foliated by ${\nabla}\text{-geodesics}$ that are not sub-Riemannian geodesics can be found in [@MR3259763]. We note that Proposition \[prop:foliazionepergeodesiche\] provides a characterization of characteristic curves in general 3-dimensional manifolds. This characterization is more natural than the one presented in [@MR2165405], [@MR2481053] and [@gr-aim]. Indeed the property that a minimal surface is foliated by horizontal straight lines is not preserved by contact changes of coordinates. In the Heisenberg structure used in [@MR2583494] minimal surfaces are foliated by horizontal parabolas, that are ${\nabla}\text{-geodesics}$ with vanishing curvature. We also stress that the structure used in [@MR2583494], see also [@MR2831583], is motivated by application in image reconstruction and vision problems, see for example [@MR2235475], [@MR2366414] and [@MR3077550]. Finally it is worth of mention that our results are optimal in view of [@MR2333095 Example 2.8].
The paper is organized as follows. In Section \[sec:preliminaries\] we provide the necessary background on contact sub-Riemannian manifolds and sets of locally finite perimeter with prescribed mean curvature. In Section \[sec:lipregsurf\] we describe Euclidean Lipschitz surfaces that are intrinsic regular graphs. The main result, Theorem \[th:main\], is proven in Section \[sec:main\]. The consequences on the mean curvature, higher regularity and a geometric characterization for characteristic curves will appear in Section \[sec:mc\].
Preliminaries {#sec:preliminaries}
=============
Contact sub-Riemannian manifolds {#sec:2.1}
--------------------------------
Let $M$ be a $3$-dimensional smooth manifold $M$ equipped with a contact form $\omega$ and a sub-Riemannian metric $g_\mathcal{H}$ defined on its *horizontal distribution* $\mathcal{H}:=\text{ker}(\omega)$. By definition, $d\omega|_{\mathcal{H}}$ is non-degenerate. We shall refer to $(M,\omega,g_\mathcal{H})$ as a *$3$-dimensional contact sub-Riemannian manifold*. It is well-known that $\omega\wedge d\omega$ is an orientation form in $M$. Since $$d\omega(X,Y)=X(\omega(Y))-Y(\omega(X))-\omega([X,Y]),$$ the horizontal distribution $\mathcal{H}$ is completely non-integrable.
\[def:horizontal\] A vector field $X$ is called *horizontal* if $X\in {\mathcal{H}}$ . A *horizontal curve* is a $C^1$ curve whose tangent vector lies in the horizontal distribution.
The *Reeb vector field* $T$ in $M$ is the only one satisfying $$\label{eq:reeb}
\omega(T)=1,\qquad \mathcal{L}_T\omega=0,$$ where $\mathcal{L}$ is the Lie derivative in $M$.
A canonical contact structure in Euclidean $3$-space ${{\mathbb{R}}}^3$ with coordinates $(x,y,t)$ is given by the contact one-form $\omega_0:=dt-ydx$. The associated contact manifold is the Heisenberg group ${{\mathbb{H}}}^1$. A basis of the horizontal left invariant vector is $$\label{X_0andY_0}
X_0=\frac{\partial}{\partial x} +y\frac{\partial}{\partial t}, \quad Y_0=\frac{\partial}{\partial y},$$ while the Reeb vector field is $$\label{X_0andY_0}
T_0=\frac{\partial}{\partial t}.$$
Darboux’s Theorem [@MR1874240 Thm. 3.1] (see also [@MR2979606]) implies that, given a point $p\in M$, there exists an open neighborhood $U$ of $p$ and a diffeomorphism $\phi_p$ from $U$ into an open set of ${{\mathbb{R}}}^{3}$ satisfying $\phi_p^*\omega_0=\omega$. Such a local chart will be called a *Darboux chart*. Composing the map $\phi_p$ with a contact transformation of ${{\mathbb{H}}}^1$ also provides a Darboux chart. This implies we can prescribe the image of a point $p\in U$ and the image of a horizontal direction in $T_pM$.
The metric $g_\mathcal{H}$ can be uniquely extended to a Riemannian metric $g$ on $M$ by requiring $T$ to be a unit vector orthogonal to $\mathcal{H}$. The Levi-Civita connection associated to $g$ will be denoted by $D$. The Riemannian volume element in $(M,g)$ will be denoted by $dM$ and coincides with Popp’s measure [@MR1867362 § 10.6], [@MR3108867]. The volume of a set $E\subset M$ with respect to the Riemannian metric $g$ will be denoted by $|E|$.
Torsion and the sub-Riemannian connection
-----------------------------------------
The following is taken from [@Gaphd § 3.1.2]. In a contact sub-Riemannian manifold, we can decompose the endomorphism $X\in TM\rightarrow D_X T$ into its antisymmetric and symmetric parts, which we will denoted by $J$ and $\tau$, respectively, $$\label{eq:jtau}
\begin{split}
2{g(J(X),Y)}&={g(D_X T,Y)}-{g(D_Y T,X)},\\
2{g(\tau(X),Y)}&={g(D_X T,Y)}+{g(D_Y T,X)}.
\end{split}$$ Observe that $J(X),\tau(X)\in{\mathcal{H}}$ for any vector field $X$, and that $J(T)=\tau(T)=0$. Also note that $$\label{eq:J}
2{g(J(X),Y)}=-{g([X,Y],T)}, \qquad X,Y\in\mathcal{H}.$$ We will call $\tau$ the *$($contact$)$ sub-Riemannian torsion*. We note that our $J$ differs from the one defined in [@MR3044134 (2.4)] by the constant $g([X,Y],T)$, but plays the same geometric role and can be easily generalized to higher dimensions, [@Gaphd § 3.1.2].
Now we define the *$($contact$)$ sub-Riemannian connection* $\nabla$ as the unique metric connection, [@MR2229062 eq. (I.5.3)], with torsion tensor $\operatorname{Tor}(X,Y)=\nabla_XY-\nabla_YX-[X,Y]$ given by $$\label{def:tor}
\operatorname{Tor}(X,Y):={g(X,T)}\,\tau(Y)-{g(Y,T)}\,\tau(X)+2{g(J(X),Y)}\,T.$$ From and Koszul formula for the connection $\nabla$ it follows that $\nabla T\equiv 0$.
The standard orientation of $M$ is given by the $3$-form $\omega\wedge d\omega$. If $X_p$ is horizontal, then the basis $\{X_p,J(X_p),T_p\}$ is positively oriented, in fact $(\omega\wedge d\omega)(X,J(X),T)$ and $d\omega(X,J(X))$ have the same sign and $$d\omega(X,J(X))=-\omega([X,J(X)])=-g([X,J(X)],T)=g(\operatorname{Tor}(X,J(X)),T)=2\,g(J(X),J(X))>0.$$
Perimeter and Lipschitz surfaces
--------------------------------
A set $E\subset M$ has *locally finite perimeter* if, for any bounded open set $B\subset M$, we have $$P(E,B):=\sup\bigg\{\int_{E\,\cap\,B}\operatorname{div}U\,dM: U\ \text{horizontal},\ \text{supp}(U)\subset B, ||U||_\infty{\leqslant}1\bigg\}<+\infty.$$ The quantity $P(E,B)$ is called the *relative perimeter* of $E$ in $B$.
Assuming ${\partial}E$ is a Lipschitz surface and using the Divergence Theorem for Lipschitz boundaries, it is easy to show that the relative perimeter of $E$ in a bounded open set $B\subset M$ coincides with the sub-Riemannian area of ${\partial}E\cap B$, given by $$\label{eq:areaC1}
A({\partial}E\cap B)=\int_{{\partial}E\,\cap\, B}|N_h|\,d({\partial}E).$$ Here $N$ is the Riemannian unit normal to ${\partial}E$, $N_h$ is the horizontal projection of $N$ to the horizontal distribution, and $d({\partial}E)$ is the Riemannian area measure, all computed with respect the Riemannian metric $g$, see [@MR2312336].
Sets with prescribed mean curvature {#sec:pmc}
-----------------------------------
Let ${\Omega}$ a domain in $M$ and let $f:{\Omega}\to{{\mathbb{R}}}$ a given function. We shall say that a set of locally finite perimeter $E\subset{\Omega}$ has *prescribed mean curvature $f$ on ${\Omega}$* if, for any bounded open set $B\subset{\Omega}$, $E$ is a critical point of the functional $$\label{eq:a-hv}
P(E,B)-\int_{E\cap B} f,$$ where $P(E,B)$ is the relative perimeter of $E$ in $B$, and the integral on $E\cap B$ is computed with respect to the canonical Popp’s measure on $M$. The admissible variations for this problem are the flows induced by vector fields with compact support in $B$.
Let ${\Sigma}={\partial}E$ be a Lipschitz surface in ${\Omega}$, we say that ${\Sigma}$ has *prescribed mean curvature* $f$ if it is a critical point of the functional $$\label{eq:prescribedfunctional}
A({\Sigma}\cap B) -\int_{E\cap B} f,$$ for any bounded open set $B\subset{\Omega}$.
These definitions are the counterpart of the ones in the Euclidean setting, [@MR2976521 (12.32) and Remark 17.11]. We note that they are been introduced in the sub-Riemannian setting in [@GalRit15] .
If $E$ is a critical point of the relative perimeter $P(E,B)$ in any bounded open set $B\subset{\Omega}$, then $E$ has vanishing prescribed mean curvature.
A characterization of Euclidean Lipschitz regular surfaces {#sec:lipregsurf}
==========================================================
The notion of *regular surface* in the sub-Riemannian geometry has been introduced by Franchi, Serapioni and Serra Cassano, [@MR1871966; @MR1984849]. They defined a regular surface ${\Sigma}$ as the zero level set of a function $f$, whose horizontal gradient $\nabla^h(f)$ never vanishes. The *horizontal gradient* is defined as $$\nabla^h(f):=X_1(f)\,X_1+X_2(f)\,X_2,$$ where $\{X_1,X_2\}$ is an orthonormal basis of ${\mathcal{H}}$. We remark that the function $f$ defining a regular surface ${\Sigma}$ can be merely $\frac{1}{2}$-Hölder continuous from the Euclidean viewpoint and there exists regular surfaces with fractional Euclidean Hausdorff measure, [@MR2124590]. This notion can not be applied to Euclidean Lipschitz surfaces since $\nabla^h(f)$ is not defined at every point. On other hand it is well-known that a regular surface can be locally described as an *intrinsic graph*, using an implicit function theorem, see [@MR1871966; @MR2313532; @MR2263950].
Since we are mainly focused on local regularity property, it is not restrictive to describe an Euclidean Lipschitz surface ${\Sigma}$ as follows. Given a point $p\in{\Sigma}$, we consider a Darboux chart $(U_p,\phi_p)$ such that $\phi_p(p)=0$. The metric $g_{\mathcal{H}}$ can be described in this local chart by the matrix of smooth functions $$G=\begin{pmatrix}
g_{11} & g_{12}
\\
g_{21} & g_{22}
\end{pmatrix}
=
\begin{pmatrix}
g(X,X) & g(X,Y)
\\
g(Y,X) & g(Y,Y)
\end{pmatrix}.$$ Under the assumption that ${\Sigma}$ is an Euclidean Lipschitz surface, we can define $p$ a *regular point* in ${\Sigma}$ if there exists (eventually after a Euclidean rotation around the $t$-axis) an open neighborhood $B\cap{\Sigma}$ that is the graph $G_u$ of a Euclidean Lipschitz function $u:D\to{{\mathbb{R}}}$ defined on a domain $D$ in the vertical plane $y=0$. A point $p\in{\Sigma}$ is *singular* when it is not regular and we denote by ${\Sigma}_0$ the set of the singular points of ${\Sigma}$. We remark that an analogous notion was used in 3-dimensional Lie groups in [@MR2831583].
Now we introduce some geometric quantities of the graph $G_u$. We have that $G_u$ can be parameterized by the map $u:D\to{{\mathbb{R}}}^3$ defined by $$f_u(x,t):=(x,u(x,t),t),\qquad (x,t)\in D.$$ The tangent plane is defined in a.e. point in $G_u$ and, when it exists, it is generated by the vectors $E_1,E_2$ obtained in the following way $$\begin{aligned}
\tfrac{{\partial}}{{\partial}x}&\mapsto E_1=(1,u_x,-u-xu_x)=X+u_xY-uT,
\\
\tfrac{{\partial}}{{\partial}t}&\mapsto E_2=(0,u_t,1-xu_t)=u_tY+T.\end{aligned}$$ Then the characteristic direction is given by $Z=\widetilde{Z}/|\widetilde{Z}|$, where $$\widetilde{Z}=X+(u_x+uu_t)Y.$$ We observe that the vector $\widetilde{Z}$ is well-defined and continuous in an Euclidean Lipschitz regular surface since $G_u$ is an intrinsic graph, see [@MR2223801; @MR2600502].
If ${\gamma}(s)=(x(s),t(s))$ is a $C^1$ curve in $D$, then the lifted curve in $G_u$ is $${\Gamma}(s)=(x(s),u(x(s),t(s)),t(s)-x(s)u(x(s),t(s)))\subset G_u.$$ We stress that even if ${\Gamma}$ is Lipschitz and the tangent vector $${\Gamma}'(s)=x'\,(X+u_xY-uT)+t'\,(u_tY+T)=x'X+(x'u_x+t'u_t)Y+(t'-ux')T$$ exists for a.e. $s$, the vertical component of ${\Gamma}'(s)$ is well defined in all point of $G_u$. In particular, horizontal curves in $G_u$ satisfy the ordinary differential equation $t'=ux'$.
Since $u\in Lip(D)$, we have uniqueness of characteristic curves through any given point in $G_u$.
Finally, from [@GalRit15 (4.2)] and the approximation technique in [@MR3168633 Theorem 1.7], we obtain $$\label{eq:areagraph}
A(G_u)=\int_D \big(g_{22}(f_u)(u_x+uu_t)^2+2g_{12}(f_u)(u_x+uu_t)+g_{11}(f_u)\big)^{1/2}dxdt.$$ We remark that the functions $g_{ij}$ are bounded on the Darboux chart $U$.
Regularity of prescribed mean curvature sets with Lipschitz boundary {#sec:main}
====================================================================
First we show a characterization on the area-stationary property of $G_u$
\[prop:1stvariation\] Let $G_u$ be the graph of an Euclidean Lipschitz function $u:D\to{{\mathbb{R}}}$, defined on a Darboux chart by the parametrization $$f_u(x,t):=(x,u(x,t),t),\qquad (x,t)\in D.$$ We suppose that the area of $G_u$ is defined by and $G_u$ has prescribed mean curvature $f$. Then $$\label{eq:1stvariation smooth test function}
\int_D \big(Kv+M\,(v_x+uv_t+vu_t\big)\,dxdt=0$$ for any $v\in C^1_0(D)$, where the functions $K$, $K_1$ and $M$ are given by $$K=K_1-f\,\det(G),$$ $$K_1=\frac{\frac{\partial g_{22}}{\partial y}\cdot(u_x+uu_t)^2+2 \frac{\partial g_{12}}{\partial y}\cdot(u_x+uu_t)+\frac{\partial g_{11}}{\partial y}}{2(g_{22}\cdot(u_x+uu_t)^2+2g_{12}(u_x+uu_t)+g_{11})^{1/2}},$$ and $$\label{def:M}
M=\frac{g_{22}(u_x+uu_t)+g_{12}}{(g_{22}(u_x+uu_t)^2+2g_{12}(u_x+uu_t)+g_{11})^{1/2}}.$$
First we prove a first variation formula for $A(G_u)$ for variations of $G_u$ given by $G_{u+sv}$, where $v\in C^1_0(D)$ and $s$ is a small parameter. Denoting $w=u+sv$, we have $$\frac{d}{ds}\bigg|_{s=0}A(G_{w})= \int_D \frac{d}{ds}\bigg|_{s=0} \big(g_{22}(f_w)(w_x+ww_t)^2+2g_{12}(f_w)(w_x+ww_t)+g_{11}(f_w)\big)^{1/2}dxdt.$$ Taking into account that $$\frac{d}{ds} g_{ij}(f_w)=\frac{\partial}{\partial y}g_{ij} (f_w)\cdot \frac{d}{ds}w= \frac{\partial}{\partial y}g_{ij} (f_w)\cdot v$$ and $$\frac{d}{ds} (w_x+ww_t)= v_x+uv_t+vu_t,$$ we conclude $$\frac{d}{ds}\bigg|_{s=0}A(G_{w})=\int_D \big(K_1v+M\,(v_x+uv_t+vu_t\big)\,dxdt=0.$$ Here $K$ and $M$ are defined in the statement of the proposition. On the other hand it is easy to see that $$\frac{d}{ds}\bigg|_{s=0} \int_{\text{subgraph}\,G_{u+sv}} f=\int_D f\,\det(G)\,v\,dxdt,$$ which conclude the proof.
Now we are able to prove the main regularity result
\[th:main\] Let $M$ be a $3$-dimensional contact sub-Riemannian manifold, ${\Omega}\subset M$ a domain, and $E\subset{\Omega}$ a set of prescribed mean curvature $f\in C({\Omega})$ with Euclidean Lipschitz boundary $\partial E={\Sigma}$. If ${\Sigma}$ is locally a Lipschitz regular graph, then the characteristic curves are of class $C^2$.
Given any point $p\in {\Sigma}-{\Sigma}_0$, it is sufficient show the result in the Darboux chart $(U,\phi)$ introduced in Section \[sec:lipregsurf\]. We consider $$Z=\frac{X+(u_x+uu_t)\,Y}{(g_{22}(u_x+uu_t)^2+2g_{12}(u_x+uu_t)+g_{11})^{1/2}},$$ the tangent vector to an horizontal curve in ${{\mathbb{G}}}_u$. The function $M$ introduced in coincides with $g(Z,Y)\circ f_u$. Then $$1=|Z|^2=\det(G)^{-1}\big(g_{22}{g(Z,X)}^2-2g_{12}{g(Z,X)}{g(Z,Y)}+g_{11}{g(Z,Y)}^2\big)$$ and $$\label{eq:ZX}
{g(Z,X)}=\frac{g_{12}g(Z,Y)\pm (\det(G)(g_{22}-{g(Z,Y)}^2))^{1/2}}{g_{22}}.$$ By Schwarz’s inequality ${g(Z,Y)}^2{\leqslant}{g(Y,Y)}=g_{22}$. Inequality is strict since otherwise $Y$ and $Z$ would be collinear. Hence ${g(Z,X)}$ has the same regularity as ${g(Z,Y)}$ by .
Now we proceed as in the proof of [@GalRit15 Theorem 4.1], see also [@gr-aim Theorem 3.5]. Assume the point $p\in G_u$ corresponds to the point $(a,b)$ in the $xt$-plane. The curve $s\mapsto (s,t(s))$ is (a reparameterization of the projection of) a characteristic curve if and only if the function $t(s)$ satisfies the ordinary differential equation $t'(s)=u(s,t(s))$. For ${\varepsilon}$ small enough, we consider the solution $t_{\varepsilon}$ of equation $t_{\varepsilon}'(s)=u(s,t_{\varepsilon}(s))$ with initial condition $t_{\varepsilon}(a)=b+{\varepsilon}$, and define ${\gamma}_{\varepsilon}(s):=(s,t_{\varepsilon}(s))$, with ${\gamma}={\gamma}_0$. We may assume that, for small enough ${\varepsilon}$, the functions $t_{\varepsilon}$ are defined in the interval $[a-r,a+r]$ for some $r>0$. We consider the parameterization $$F(\xi,{\varepsilon}):= (\xi,t_{\varepsilon}(\xi))=(s,t)$$ near the characteristic curve through $(a,b)$. The jacobian of this parameterization is given by $$\det\begin{pmatrix}
1 & t'_{\varepsilon}\\
0 & {\partial}t_{\varepsilon}/{\partial}{\varepsilon}\end{pmatrix}=\frac{{\partial}t_{\varepsilon}}{{\partial}{\varepsilon}},$$ which is positive because of the choice of initial condition for $t_{\varepsilon}$ and the fact that the curves ${\gamma}_{\varepsilon}(s)$ foliate a neighborhood of $(a,b)$. We remark that $t_{\varepsilon}$ is a Lipschitz function with respect to ${\varepsilon}$, [@MR2961944 Theorem 2.9], and the jacobian of the parametrization is well-defined. Using the implicit function theorem for Lipschitz functions, [@MR0425047; @MR2206097], any function $\varphi$ can be considered as a function of the variables $(\xi,{\varepsilon})$ by making $\tilde{\varphi}(\xi,{\varepsilon}):=\varphi(\xi,t_{\varepsilon}(\xi))$. Changing variables, and assuming the support of $\varphi$ is contained in a sufficiently small neighborhood of $(a,b)$, we can express the integral as $$\int_{I}\bigg\{\int_{a-r}^{a+r}\bigg(K\tilde{\varphi}+M\,\bigg(\frac{{\partial}\tilde{\varphi}}{{\partial}\xi}+2\tilde{\varphi} \tilde{u}_t\bigg)\bigg)\,\frac{{\partial}t_{\varepsilon}}{{\partial}{\varepsilon}}\,d\xi\bigg\}\,d{\varepsilon},$$ where $I$ is a small interval containing $0$. Instead of $\tilde{\varphi}$, we can consider the function $\tilde{\zeta}=\tilde{\varphi} h /( t_{{\varepsilon}+h}-t_{\varepsilon})$, where $h$ is a sufficiently small real parameter. We get that $$\frac{ {\partial}\tilde{\zeta}}{{\partial}\xi}=\frac{{\partial}\tilde{\varphi}}{{\partial}\xi}\cdot \frac{h}{t_{{\varepsilon}+h}-t_{\varepsilon}}-2\tilde{\varphi}\cdot \frac{\tilde{u}(\xi, {\varepsilon}+h)-\tilde{u}(\xi,{\varepsilon})}{t_{{\varepsilon}+h}-t_{\varepsilon}}\cdot \frac{h}{t_{{\varepsilon}+h}-t_{\varepsilon}}$$ tends a.e. to $$\frac{{\partial}\tilde{\varphi}/{\partial}\xi}{{\partial}t_{\varepsilon}/{\partial}{\varepsilon}}-\frac{2\tilde{\varphi}\tilde{u}_t}{{\partial}t_{\varepsilon}/{\partial}{\varepsilon}},$$ when $h\rightarrow 0$. So using that $G_u$ is area-stationary we have that $$\int_{I}\bigg\{\int_{a-r}^{a+r} \frac{h}{t_{{\varepsilon}+h}-t_{\varepsilon}}\bigg(K\, \tilde{\varphi}+M\,\bigg(\frac{{\partial}\tilde{\varphi}}{{\partial}\xi}\cdot +2 \tilde{\varphi}\cdot \bigg(\tilde{u}_t-\frac{\tilde{u}(\xi, {\varepsilon}+h)-\tilde{u}(\xi,{\varepsilon})}{t_{{\varepsilon}+h}-t_{\varepsilon}}\bigg)\bigg)\bigg)\,\frac{{\partial}t_{\varepsilon}}{{\partial}{\varepsilon}}\,d\xi\bigg\}\,d{\varepsilon}$$ vanishes. Furthermore, letting $h\rightarrow 0$ we conclude $$\int_{I}\bigg\{\int_{a-r}^{a+r}\bigg(K\tilde{\varphi}+M\,\frac{{\partial}\tilde{\varphi}}{{\partial}\xi}\bigg)\,d\xi\bigg\}\,d{\varepsilon}=0.$$
Let now $\eta:{{\mathbb{R}}}\to{{\mathbb{R}}}$ be a positive function with compact support in the interval $I$ and consider the family $\eta_\rho(x):=\rho^{-1}\eta(x/\rho)$. Inserting a test function of the form $\eta_\rho({\varepsilon})\psi(\xi)$, where $\psi$ is a $C^\infty$ function with compact support in $(a-r,a+r)$, making $\rho\to 0$, and using that $G_u$ is area-stationary we obtain $$\int_{a-r}^{a+r} \big(K(0,\xi)\,\psi(\xi)+M(0,\xi)\,\psi'(\xi)\big)\,d\xi=0$$ for any $\psi\in C^\infty_0((a-r,a+r))$. By [@GalRit15 Lemma 4.2], the function $M(0,\xi)$, which is the restriction of ${g(Z,Y)}$ to the characteristic curve, is a $C^1$ function on the curve. By equation , the restriction of ${g(Z,X)}$ to the characteristic curve is also $C^1$. This proves that horizontal curves are of class $C^2$.
The mean curvature and a characterization of characteristic curves {#sec:mc}
==================================================================
In this section we introduce the definition of the mean curvature of a regular Lipschitz boundary and present some consequences. This results partially follows [@GalRit15 § 4] and we will omit some proofs.
Given a Lipschitz surface ${\Sigma}\subset M$ such that the characteristic curves are $C^2$-smooth in ${\Sigma}\setminus{\Sigma}_0$, we define the *mean curvature* of ${\Sigma}$ at $p\in {\Sigma}\setminus{\Sigma}_0$ by $$\label{eq:Hstrongsense}
H(p):= g({\nabla}_Z Z,\nu_h)(p).$$ This is the standard definition of mean curvature for Euclidean $C^2$ surfaces, see e.g. [@MR2165405 (2.1)], [@MR2435652 (4.8)] and [@MR2354992 (1.4)]. Using the regularity Theorem \[th:main\] we get
\[prop:1stareaStrong\] Let $\Omega\subset M$ be a domain and $E\subset \Omega$ a set of prescribed mean curvature $f\in C(\Omega)$ with Lipschitz boundary ${\Sigma}$ with $H\in L^1_{loc}({\Sigma})$. Then the first variation of the functional induced by an horizontal vector field $U\in C^1_0(\Omega)$ is given by $$\label{eq:1stvariationprescribedfunctional}
\begin{split}
\int_{{\Sigma}}H\, {|N_{H}|}\,g(U,\nu_h) \,d{\Sigma}-\int_{\Sigma}f \,{|N_{H}|}\,g(U,\nu_h)\,d{\Sigma}.
\end{split}$$
We first observe that formula $$\frac{d}{ds}\bigg|_{s=0} A({\Sigma}_s)=-\int_{{\Sigma}}H\, {|N_{H}|}\,g(U,\nu_h) \,d{\Sigma}$$ can be proved as in [@MR3044134 § 6] with a standard approximation argument. Note that even $N$ is defined a.e. on ${\Sigma}$, ${|N_{H}|}$ and $\nu_h$ are well defined on ${\Sigma}-{\Sigma}_0$. On the other hand, it is well-known that $$\frac{d}{ds}\bigg|_{s=0} \bigg(\int_{\phi_s(\Omega)} f \bigg)= -\int_{\Sigma}f \,{|N_{H}|}\,g(U,\nu_h)\, d{\Sigma},$$ see e.g. [@MR2976521 17.8].
The following corollary is an immediate consequence of
Let $E\subset{\Omega}$ be a set of prescribed mean curvature $f\in C(\Omega)$ with Lipschitz boundary ${\Sigma}$ in a domain ${\Omega}\subset M$. Assume $H\in L^1_{loc}({\Sigma})$. Then $H(p)=f(p)$ for any $p\in{\Sigma}\setminus{\Sigma}_0$.
Finally we can improve the regularity of Theorem \[th:main\] assuming an higher regularity for $f$.
\[prop:C\^k\] Let $E\subset{\Omega}$ be a set of prescribed mean curvature $f\in C(\Omega)$ with $C^1$ boundary ${\Sigma}$ in a domain ${\Omega}\subset M$. Assume that $f$ is also $C^k$ in the $Z$-direction, $k{\geqslant}1$. Then the characteristic curves of ${\Sigma}$ are of class $C^{k+2}$ in ${\Sigma}\setminus{\Sigma}_0$.
The proof of last proposition is the analogous of [@GalRit15 Proposition 5.3]. A remarkable consequence of Proposition \[prop:C\^k\] is that critical points of perimeter (eventually under a volume constraint) with Lipschitz boundaries are foliated by smooth horizontal curves on its regular set.
To provide a geometric characterization of characteristic curves we need the following definition
A curve ${\gamma}$ is a ${\nabla}$-geodesic of curvature $h:I\rightarrow {{\mathbb{R}}}$ if $${\nabla}_{\dot{{\gamma}}}\dot{{\gamma}}+h J(\dot{{\gamma}})=0.$$
\[rem:geodeticheaconfronto\] We stress that a ${\nabla}$-geodesic of curvature $h$ is a sub-Riemannian geodesic if and only if it satisfies $$\dot{{\gamma}}(h)=g(\tau(\dot{{\gamma}}),\dot{{\gamma}}),$$ see [@Ru Proposition 15].
\[prop:foliazionepergeodesiche\] Let $E\subset{\Omega}$ be a set of prescribed mean curvature $f\in C(\Omega)$ with Lipschitz boundary ${\Sigma}$ in a domain ${\Omega}\subset M$. Then the characteristic curves in ${\Sigma}-{\Sigma}_0$ are ${\nabla}$-geodesic of curvature $H$, where $H$ is defined in .
Let $Z$ the tangent unit vector to a characteristic curve ${\gamma}:I\rightarrow {\Sigma}-{\Sigma}_0$. Then we have $$\begin{split}
{\nabla}_Z Z&=g({\nabla}_Z Z,Z)+g({\nabla}_Z Z,T)+g({\nabla}_Z Z,\nu_h)\\
&=g({\nabla}_Z Z,\nu_h)\\
&=-HJ(Z).
\end{split}$$
The result in Proposition \[prop:foliazionepergeodesiche\] was shown for $C^2$ CMC surfaces in ${{\mathbb{H}}}^1$, [@MR2648078; @MR2354992; @MR2435652], in Sasakian space forms, [@MR2875642], and in general 3-dimensional contact manifolds, [@MR3044134; @MR2401420; @MR2579306; @MR3259763].
[^1]: M. Galli has been supported by the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013/ under REA grant agreement n. 607643.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: '[In this paper we propose the idea that flavons can emerge from extra dimensional gauge fields, referred to as gauge-flavon unification (GFU) analogous to gauge-Higgs unification (GHU). We assume that there is a gauged family symmetry in extra dimensions and that the flavons are the extra dimensional components of the gauge field. This provides a simple mechanism to align the VEVs of the flavons through a combination of Wilson lines and orbifold symmetry breaking. We present some simple 5d examples of GFU based on $SO(3)$ and $SU(4)$ gauged family symmetry, the latter case yielding $SU(3)\times U(1)$ gauged family symmetry in 4d, broken by triplet and antitriplet flavons, with effective couplings to fermions. We also present a general formalism for Wilson lines and orbifolds, in any number of dimensions, including non-commutative aspects Wilson lines, which may be useful for aligning additional flavons as required for realistic models. ]{}'
---
[**Gauge-flavon unification** ]{}\
Alfredo Aranda$^{\ddag}$[^1], Francisco J. de Anda$^{\dagger}$[^2], Stephen F. King$^{\star}$[^3],\
$^{\ddag}$ *Facultad de Ciencias-CUICBAS, Universidad de Colima, C.P.28045, Colima, México 01000, México*
Dual CP Institute of High Energy Physics, C.P. 28045, Colima, México
$^{\dagger}$ *Tepatitl[á]{}n’s Institute for Theoretical Studies, C.P. 47600, Jalisco, M[é]{}xico*
$^{\star}$ *School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton,*
*SO17 1BJ Southampton, United Kingdom*
Introduction
============
Symmetry breaking plays an important role in particle physics. In the Standard Model (SM), the scalar Higgs field, is charged under the local gauged $SU(2)\times U(1)$ symmetry and acquires a vacuum expectation value (VEV) order parameter. In extra dimensions, gauge symmetries may be broken by the presence of background gauge fields on non-simply connected manifolds, a phenomenon known as the Hosotani mechanism [@Hosotani:1983xw; @Hosotani:1983vn], or Wilson-line symmetry breaking [@Candelas:1985en]. It is based on the Aharonov-Bohm observation that in the presence of a non-contractible loop, a gauge field can not always be gauged away and leads to shifts of momenta with observable effects. This mechanism is an extra dimensional version of spontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB), in which the extra dimensional components of gauge fields can effectively develop VEVs.
The idea of Wilson lines has been applied to the Higgs mechanism of the SM, in an approach known as Gauge-Higgs Unification (GHU) [@Sakamura:2007qz; @Medina:2007hz; @Hall:2001zb; @Gogoladze:2003bb; @Hosotani:2006qp; @Scrucca:2003ut; @Antoniadis:2001cv; @Panico:2005dh]. This assumes extra dimensions with the Higgs boson coming from the extra dimensional part of the gauge fields. However this idea is severely challenged since it relates the compactification scale with the electroweak scale, which is tightly constrained. Nevertheless, it is interesting to consider a similar mechanism as applied to other areas of physics beyond the SM, in particular theories of flavour.
It is well appreciated that the SM does not address the flavour problem, namely the origin of the three fermion families and their pattern of masses and mixing angles. Some theories of flavour beyond the SM postulate a spontaneously broken family symmetry under which the three families form a triplet. In such models, the spontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB) of the family symmetry is achieved via the introduction of new triplet scalar fields called flavons that obtain VEVs which are aligned in various directions via an alignment potential (for a review see e.g. [@King:2013eh]). Since such theories are rather involved, it is therefore natural to ask if extra dimensions can play a role in breaking the family symmetry, analogous to the idea of GHU discussed above.
In this paper we propose the idea that flavons can emerge from extra dimensional gauge fields, which we call gauge-flavon unification (GFU) in analogy to GHU. GFU assumes that there is some gauged continuous non-Abelian family symmetry in extra dimensions, where the flavons emerge as the extra dimensional components of the gauge fields, after compactification. This identifies the compactification scale with the flavour breaking scale which is much much larger than the electroweak scale, making such an idea viable in principle. The extra dimensions allow simple mechanisms to align the VEVs of the flavons through a combination of Wilson lines and orbifolds, without the need for complicated alignment potentials. To illustrate the GHU mechanism, we present a simple example based on $SO(3)$ gauged family symmetry in 5d. This is the simplest choice since the adjoint representation is a real triplet representation, which is what we want for flavons. We also discuss a $SU(4)$ gauged family symmetry in 5d which is also a natural choice since it can be broken through orbifolding to $SU(3)\times U(1)$ and the broken generators are complex triplets which may have effective couplings to fermions. Finally we present a general formalism for Wilson lines and orbifolds, in any number of dimensions, including non-commutative aspects Wilson lines, which may be useful for aligning additional flavons.
The layout of the remainder of the paper is as follows. In section \[Wilson5d\] we review Wilson lines and orbifolds in 5d to show how the two mechanisms acting together may break the gauge group, reducing its rank, and yielding scalar fields as the extra dimensional components of the gauge fields, which may play the role of flavons. In section \[so3\] we apply these ideas to $SO(3)$ gauged family symmetry, in 5d, and show how triplet flavons with VEVs can emerge. In section \[su4\] we discuss an $SU(4)$ gauge family symmetry model in 5d, and show how complex triplet and antitriplet flavons with VEVs can arise in this case, and show how they may have effective couplings to fermions in a proto-model of quark and lepton flavour based on this mechanism. In section \[Wilson\] we give a general definition of Wilson lines and orbifolds which may be extended to any number of dimensions, including non-commutative aspects Wilson lines, which may be useful for aligning additional flavons. Section \[conclusion\] concludes the paper.
Wilson Lines and Orbifolds in 5d {#Wilson5d}
================================
Extra dimensions provide new mechanisms to break symmetries that are not available in 4d. In this section we review the Wilson line and orbifold mechanisms, to show how the two mechanisms acting together may break the gauge group, reducing its rank, and yielding scalar fields as the extra dimensional components of the gauge fields, which may play the role of flavons.
Wilson lines {#sec:wl}
------------
In four dimensional gauge theories one defines a gauge invariant Wilson loop as the trace of a path ordered (P) exponential of the gauge fields $A^a_{\mu}$ transported along a closed line $C$, $$W_C=P \exp i \oint_C T_aA^a_{\mu}dx^{\mu}
\label{W}$$ where $T_a$ are the generators of the gauge group. In the vacuum the associated field strength $F_{\mu \nu}$ can be zero. But this does not necessarily mean that the gauge fields $A^a_{\mu}(x)$ in the exponent can be set equal to zero at all points along the path $C$ by a gauge transformation. This is the Aharonov-Bohm observation.
Recall that in four dimensional gauge theories one can apply a general spacetime dependent gauge transformations on any field $\Psi(x)$, without affecting the physics $$T_aA^a_{\mu}\rightarrow \mathcal{U}(x) T_aA^a_{\mu}\mathcal{U}^{\dagger}(x) -i(\partial_{\mu} \mathcal{U}(x)) \mathcal{U}^\dagger(x), \ \
\Psi(x)\rightarrow \mathcal{U}(x)\Psi(x), \ \
\mathcal{U}(x)=e^{i\alpha^a(x)T_a},
\label{G}$$ where we absorb the gauge coupling constant into $A_\mu$. In the vacuum, if the field strength is equal to zero, it is possible to work in a gauge where the gauge fields $A^a_{\mu}$ are also equal to zero or a pure gauge. Here lies the usefulness of the Wilson line definition, where, for a pure gauge $ T_aA^a_{\mu}=-i(\partial_{\mu} \mathcal{U}(x))\mathcal{U}^{\dagger}(x)=\partial_\mu\alpha^a T_a$, it becomes $$W_C=P \exp iT_a \oint_C \partial_{\mu}\alpha^a(x) dx^{\mu},
\label{WC}$$ where the the integral is identically zero. However, this is true for only smooth functions $\alpha^a(x)$. When these functions are ill defined at some point, the loop can’t be contracted (due to the existence of a singular point) and it won’t vanish. Therefore it can generate physical field strengths.
In extra dimensions the same effect can happen even when the gauge transformations are smooth. This happens if the extra dimensions are not a simply connected space. For simplicity let us assume a single compact extra dimension which is a circle $S^1$ with radius $R$. In this case, the gauge transformation $$\mathcal{U}(y)=e^{i\alpha^a(y)T_a},$$ which only depends on the extra dimension $y$, becomes physical. This is measured through the phase (c.f. Eq. \[WC\]), $$U=e^{i\oint\partial_y\alpha^a(y)T_a dy}=e^{iT_a \int_0^{2\pi R}\partial_y\alpha^a(y) dy}=e^{i\beta^a T_a},$$ which arises from an integration through a non contractible loop and can’t be trivialized [@Hall:2001tn]. In this case, the loop is non contractible because the space is not simply connected (a circle) even with smooth functions. Any field transported around this non contractible loop will pick up the phase $U$. However, going around the whole loop brings us back to the same point, and due to the continuity of the field function this phase acts as a boundary condition $$\Psi(x,y)=U\Psi(x,y+2\pi R)=e^{i\beta^a T_a}\Psi(x,y+2\pi R),
\label{eq:psi2pir}$$ from which we can obtain the explicit dependence of the extra coordinate $y$ $$\Psi(x,y)=e^{-i\beta^a yT_a/2\pi R}\tilde{\Psi}(x,y),\ \ \ \tilde{\Psi}(x,y)=\tilde{\Psi}(x,y+2\pi R),
\label{eq:solpsi}$$ where $\tilde{\Psi}$ are periodic functions in $y$. If we move around a full circle $y\to y+2\pi R$, we recover Eq. \[eq:psi2pir\]. We can apply a gauge transformation throughout $$\Psi(x,y)\to e^{i\beta^a yT_a/2\pi R}\Psi(x,y)=\tilde{\Psi}(x,y),
\label{eq:U}$$ so that all fields are periodic in the extra dimension. This would gauge away its effect from all the fields except the gauge fields that change as $$\begin{split}
A_m^b&\to \tilde{A}_m^b+(\partial_5 e^{i\beta^a yT_a/2\pi R}) e^{-i\beta^a yT_a/2\pi R}
\\ &= \tilde{A}_m^b+\delta_m^5 \beta^b/2\pi R,
\label{Wilsonvev}
\end{split}$$
where $m=0,1,2,3,5$. This adds a constant to the 5th component of the gauge field, generating an effective VEV and breaking the symmetry spontaneously. Note that the VEV can only happen in the 5th component so that 4d Lorentz symmetry is not broken. This is the Wilson line mechanism to break the gauge symmetry [@Candelas:1985en].
Note that the effective VEV is in the adjoint representation and it can’t reduce the rank of the gauge group.
Orbifolds
---------
In 5d the simplest orbifold is $S^1/Z_2$. The orbifolding happens through the identification $$y\sim-y.$$ This forces boundary conditions on the fields which have to comply with the identification, up to a phase
$$\Psi(x,y)=P\Psi(x,-y)=e^{i\alpha^aT_a}\Psi(x,-y),
\label{eq:orcon}$$
where $P=e^{i\alpha^aT_a}$ is an arbitrary non-Abelian phase satisfying $P^2=1$, since it accompanies the parity transformation $\mathcal{P}_5$. The phase $P$ belongs to the gauge group and we assume that $\Psi$ is in the fundamental representation.
This phase $P$ affects the gauge fields $A_m=A_m^a T_a$ in the adjoint representation as $$A_\mu(x,y)=A_\mu(x,-y)^a\ PT_a P,\ \ \ A_5(x,y)=-A_5(x,-y)^a\ PT_a P,$$ where $T_a$ are the generators of the gauge group. The 5th component receives an extra minus sign since it is part of a vector field and we are applying a parity transformation on the 5th coordinate. After compactification all fields are decomposed into an infinite tower of KK modes. Only the fields that have trivial boundary condition have a massless zero mode and survive at low energies.
In the case where $P=1$, the unit matrix, after compactification, the 5d gauge vector is separated into the 4d gauge vector $A_\mu$ that has a positive eigenvalue and therefore a massless zero mode. The remaining component $A_5$ behaves like a 4d scalar and has a negative eigenvalue, therefore lacking a massless zero mode and does not survive at low energies.
In the case with general $P$, it must comply with $P^2=1$ from which we know that it only has eigenvalues $\pm 1$. This condition separates the generators $\{T_a\}=\{t_b,\tilde{t}_{\hat{b}}\}$ where $$P t_b P= t_b, \ \ \ P \tilde{t}_{\hat{b}} P=-\tilde{t}_{\hat{b}}.
\label{eq:hatb}$$ Therefore only the vector fields $A_\mu^b$ corresponding to parity even generators have a zero mode and, at low energies, the gauge group is broken into the subgroup generated by $t_b$, i.e. the ones that commute with $P$. Although the vector fields $A_\mu^{\hat{b}}$ corresponding to parity odd generators are massive, the 4d scalars $A_5^{\hat{b}}$ corresponding to the broken generators now have a zero mode, as we now discuss.
Since the orbifold operation $y=-y$ implies a parity transformation, there are two sources of a negative eigenvalue for the fields. The first one coming from the Lorentz representation, separating the extra dimensional component ($m=5$) from the 4d ones ($m=\mu$). The second one comes from the gauge representation, separating the broken generators ($\tilde{t}_{\hat{b}}$) from the unbroken ones ($t_b$). Each contribution is shown separately for each component of the gauge field, in the table \[tab:1\]. Only the fields with final combined $+1$ eigenvalue have zero mode.
$A_m^b T_b$ $T_b=t_b$ $T_b=\tilde{t}_{\hat{b}}$
------------- ----------- ---------------------------
$m=\mu $ $(1)(1)$ $(1)(-1)$
$m=5 $ $(-1)(1)$ $(-1)(-1)$
: Eigenvalues of $A_m^b$ under $(P)(\mathcal{P}_5)$ respectively for each component. The components $A_\mu^b, A_5^{\hat{b}}$ have a combined $+1$ eigenvalue and hence have massless modes.[]{data-label="tab:1"}
Then we conclude that the gauge transformation $P$ breaks the gauge symmetry at low energies into the subgroup that commutes with it. Furthermore it allows the 4d scalars corresponding to the broken generators to have zero modes.
Note that the $P$ by itself breaks the gauge symmetry at low energies but it can’t reduce the rank of the remaining gauge group. The effective 4d scalars with zero modes come from the broken generators, and if they obtain a VEV, they would reduce the rank. However they come from the extra dimensional gauge vector component and they do not have a potential that gives them a VEV. As we discuss in the next subsection, a mechanism capable of giving the 4d scalars with zero modes a VEV may be provided by Wilson lines. In this way, the combination of Wilson lines and orbifolds may break the rank of the gauge group.
Wilson lines and orbifolds
--------------------------
The simplest setup to study orbifolds together with Wilson lines happens in 5d and the orbifold $S^1/Z_2$. This orbifold is defined by the conditions on the extra dimension $$\begin{split}
y&\sim y+2\pi R,\\
y&\sim -y,
\label{eq:y}
\end{split}$$ where the first equation defines compactification on a circle while the second one is the orbifolding identification. Actually, as we will see in a later section, this is the only consistent orbifolding identification in 5d. Any field $\Psi(x,y)$ propagating through the 5th dimension would be subject to comply with the orbifold conditions from eq. \[eq:y\]. In the case, where there is a gauge symmetry, the field must comply with them up to the arbitrary phases introduced earlier, $$\begin{split}
\Psi(x,y)&=U\Psi(x,y+2\pi R),\\
\Psi(x,y)&=P\Psi(x,-y),
\label{eq:pu}
\end{split}$$ where $U,P$ are equivalent to applying Eqs. \[eq:psi2pir\],\[eq:orcon\] together. They must satisfy the consistency conditions $$P^2=1,\ \ \ PUPU=1,
\label{eq:pupu}$$ coming from the fact that they are related to a translation and a reflection as discussed below (see also [@deAnda:2019anb; @Hebecker:2003jt; @Hebecker:2001jb]).
The Wilson line mechanism and orbifolding break the 5d Poincaré symmetry but respect the 4d part. The non trivial $U$ breaks translation symmetry under the 5th coordinate while a non trivial $P$ breaks the corresponding parity. This is the most general breaking for 5d. In higher dimensions, rotations can also be broken as discussed in section \[Wilson\].
This orbifold has two fixed branes (at $y=0,\pi R$) and the gauge tranformations $U,P$ define its boundary conditions which act on the fields as $$\Psi(x,y)=P_0\Psi(x,-y),\ \ \ \Psi(x,y+\pi R)=P_{\pi R} \Psi(x,-y+\pi R).$$ where $P_{0,\pi R}$ are the corresponding boundary conditions at $0,\pi R$. These are uniquely fixed by the gauge transformations which act as boundary conditions from Eq. \[eq:pu\] to be $$P_0=P,\ \ \ P_{\pi R}= PU,$$ where the second equality comes from from applying the reflection and then the translation $$\Psi(x,y+\pi R)=P\Psi(x,-y-\pi R)=PU\Psi(x,-y-\pi R+2\pi R)=PU\Psi(x,-y+\pi R).$$ From this equation we can see that $(PU)^2=1$ implying the condition on Eq. \[eq:pupu\].
The orbifold condition $P$ breaks the gauge symmetry by modding out zero modes. The Wilson line breaking through $U$ induces an effective VEV in the scalar coming from the extra dimension. However the orbifold consistency condition from eq. \[eq:pupu\] restricts the possible VEVs $$1=PUPU=Pe^{i\beta^aT_a}Pe^{i\beta^aT_a}=e^{i\beta^a PT_aP}e^{i\beta^aT_a},$$ where the last equality comes from the fact that $P^2=1$ and it can be inserted anywhere in the expansion of the exponential. This equation is only satisfied if the phase is aligned only with the $P$ broken generators $t_{\hat{a}}$ from Eq. \[eq:hatb\] since [^4] $$e^{i\beta^{\hat{a}} Pt_{\hat{a}}P}e^{i\beta^{\hat{a}}t_{\hat{a}}}=e^{-i\beta^{\hat{a}}t_{\hat{a}}}e^{i\beta^{\hat{a}}t_{\hat{a}}}=1.$$ Therefore the effective VEV in the scalar coming from the extra dimension from Eq.\[Wilsonvev\] is $$\braket{A_5^{\hat{b}}}=\frac{\beta^{\hat{b}}}{2\pi R}.$$ This means that only the scalars coming from the fifth component of the gauge field that have a zero mode after orbifolding, can obtain an effective through the Wilson line. In this work we identify these scalars with the flavons $$A_5^{\hat{b}}\sim \phi,$$ whose VEV and its non-Abelian vacuum alignment is fixed through a choice of Wilson lines. To be precise, before orbifolding (and before Wilson lines) the gauge boson $A_5$ is in the adjoint of the higher-dimensional gauge group $G$. After orbifolding, $A_5$ is from the “Coset G/H” where $H$ is the unbroken subgroup of $G$. E.g. If one starts with $SU(5)$ and breaks it to $SU(4) \times U(1)$ by orbifolding, $A_5$ has massless modes only in the $4 + \bar{4}$ of $SU(4)$.
To summarise the mechanism we have been developing, the orbifolding process selects which zero modes survive after compactification by imposing boundary conditions. This effectively breaks the symmetry at low energies and may allow scalars with massless modes. The Wilson Line mechanism generates an effective VEV in a scalar coming from the extra dimensional part of the gauge fields. This scalar VEV must also comply with the boundary conditions coming from orbifolding. Therefore when applying both mechanisms of breaking the symmetry, the VEVs coming from the Wilson Line must lie in the rank-breaking direction of the scalar with the zero mode, thereby breaking the rank of the gauge group [^5]. We emphasise that the orbifold breaking alone does not reduce the rank of the gauge group. With both orbifold and Wilson line breaking, the VEV must be aligned along the rank breaking direction, thereby reducing the rank of the remaining gauge group.
$SO(3)$ Gauge-Flavon Unification {#so3}
================================
As a first example of the preceding formalism, consider the gauge group $SO(3)$ in 5d, with an orbifold $S^1/Z_2$, where the extra dimensional part of the gauge fields are scalars which transform as triplets under $SO(3)$. If this is chosen to be a gauged family symmetry, these fields are identified as flavons.
The VEVs of such flavons can be achieved via the Wilson line mechanism as described in Section \[Wilson5d\]. We would have as many flavons as extra dimensions (in this case one) and their alignment is fixed by the choice of the Wilson line phase.
In the presence of both Wilson lines and orbifold boundary conditions, we need to consider the generators of the $SO(3)$ algebra which are $$T_{1}=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & -1 \\ 0 & 1 & 0\end{array} \right),\ \ T_{2}=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}0 & 0 & -1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0\end{array} \right),\ \ T_{3}=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}0 & -1 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{array} \right),$$ Any element of the algebra of $SO(3)$, and therefore any phase from a Wilson line as in Eq. \[eq:psi2pir\], can be written as $$U=e^{i\beta^aT_a}, \ \ \ \
T_a\beta^a=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}
0&\beta^3&\beta^2\\
-\beta^3&0&\beta^1\\
-\beta^2&-\beta^1&0
\end{array}\right),
\label{eq:uso3}$$ with real $\beta^a$. This can be rewritten in the usual flavon notation as a triplet column vector $$\braket{\phi}=\frac{1}{2\pi R}\left(\begin{array}{c}\beta^1\\ \beta^2 \\ \beta^3\end{array}\right),
\label{eq:uso31}$$ so that we can obtain any desired real alignment by choosing the phase.[^6]
If we only have the Wilson line, without any $SO(3)$ orbifold breaking condition, it can always be rotated to the $(0,0,1)^T$ direction, which breaks $SO(3)\to U(1)$, preserving the rank.
On the other hand if we consider orbifold breaking without Wilson lines, the parity $P$ boundary condition can always be rotated to be $$P=e^{i\pi T_{3}}=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}-1&0&0 \\ 0 & -1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 &1 \end{array}\right),
\label{eq:pso3}$$ which breaks $SO(3)\to U(1)$ (and also does not reduce rank).
However, as discussed in the previous section, the combination of Wilson lines and orbifold boundary conditions can reduce the rank of the remaining symmetry group. The boundary condition $P$ leaves an $U(1)$ invariant and the Wilson Line can give a VEV in that remaining $U(1)$.
Imposing the $U$ from Eq. \[eq:uso3\] together with the $P$ from Eq. \[eq:pso3\], they must comply with the consistency condition from Eq. \[eq:pupu\] $$\begin{split}
PUPU&=1\\
&=(Pe^{i\beta^aT_a}P)e^{i\beta^aT_a}=e^{i\beta^aPT_aP}e^{i\beta^aT_a}\\
&=e^{i(-\beta^1T_1-\beta^2T_2+\beta^3T_3)}e^{i(\beta^1T_1+\beta^2T_2+\beta^3T_3)},
\end{split}$$ which has 2 nontrivial solutions. The first one is where $\beta^3=0$ and general real $\beta^{1,2}$. This is equivalent to a flavon alignment $$\braket{\phi}=\frac{1}{2\pi R}\left(\begin{array}{c} \beta^1\\ \beta^2 \\ 0
\end{array}\right),$$ which breaks the remaining $U(1)$. However in this example there is also a rank preserving solution. [^7]
In the $SO(3)$ gauge theory with 6 dimensions where the orbifold is $T^2/\mathbb{Z}_2$, there would be two flavons obtained. There would also be two possible Wilson lines associated with each extra dimensions $$U_5=e^{i\beta^a_5T_a},\ \ \ U_6=e^{i\beta^a_6T_a}.$$ Coming from translations of independent circles, these phases must commute $[U_5,U_6]=0$, and this fixes $$\beta^a_5\propto\beta^a_6,$$ which means that the two flavon VEVs must be aligned with each other so nothing is gained by having two flavons with identically aligned VEVs. However, we can override this condition assuming an $SO(3)$ gauge theory, where there is a non-commutative twist in the fibre bundle as described in Sec. \[sec:noncom\], leading to non-aligned VEVs in that case. However for the moment we shall continue to consider the usual commutative case, and go on to consider another example.
$SU(4)$ Gauge-Flavon Unification {#su4}
================================
Flavon sector
-------------
As a second example, let us assume that we have a $SU(4)$ gauge family symmetry model in $5$ dimensions with an orbifold $S^1/Z_2$. Since this group allows complex representations, it will allow two non-aligned flavons in conjugate representations. In this case, let us assume that the extra dimensions are orbifolded with a twist on the ED parity $$P_M\sim{\mathrm{diag}}(1,1,1,-1),$$ that breaks $SU(4)\to SU(3)\times U(1)$. The generators $T_a$ with $a=1,...,15$ decompose as $$\begin{split}
T_a&=\lambda_a,\ \ \ {\rm for}\ \ \ a=1,...,8,\ \ \ T_{15}={\mathrm{diag}}(-1/3,-1/3,-1/3,1)\\
T_9&=
\left(\begin{array}{cccc} 0&0&0&1\\0&0&0&0\\0&0&0&0\\1&0&0&0
\end{array}\right),\ \ \ T_{11}=
\left(\begin{array}{cccc} 0&0&0&0\\0&0&0&1\\0&0&0&0\\0&1&0&0
\end{array}\right),\ \ \ T_{13}=
\left(\begin{array}{cccc} 0&0&0&0\\0&0&0&0\\0&0&0&1\\0&0&1&0
\end{array}\right),\\
T_{10}&=
\left(\begin{array}{cccc} 0&0&0&-i\\0&0&0&0\\0&0&0&0\\i&0&0&0
\end{array}\right),\ \ \ T_{12}=
\left(\begin{array}{cccc} 0&0&0&0\\0&0&0&-i\\0&0&0&0\\0&i&0&0
\end{array}\right),\ \ \ T_{14}=
\left(\begin{array}{cccc} 0&0&0&0\\0&0&0&0\\0&0&0&-i\\0&0&i&0
\end{array}\right),
\end{split}$$ where the first line contains the Gell-Mann matrices $\lambda_a$, the generators of the unbroken $SU(3)$ and $T_{15}$ the generator of the unbroken $U(1)$. The Wilson line phase can be written $U=e^{i\beta^aT_a}$ as in Eq. \[eq:uso3\] and it must comply with the consistency condition from Eq. \[eq:pupu\] $$1=P_MUP_MU=P_M e^{i\beta^aT_a}P_Me^{i\beta^aT_a}=e^{i\beta^a(P_MT_aP_M)}e^{i\beta^aT_a}.$$ It can easily be seen that $$\begin{split}
P_M T_a P_M=T_a,\ \ \ &{\rm for} \ \ \ a=1,...,8,15,\\
P_M T_a P_M=-T_a,\ \ \ &{\rm for} \ \ \ a=9,...,14,
\end{split}$$ so that $U$ can only have the generators $T_a$ with $a=9,...,14$. This way the gauge fields are broken by the boundary condition $P_M$ into $$15\to 8_0+1_0+3_{-4/3}+\bar{3}_{4/3},$$ where the subscript indicate the $U(1)$ charge. The Wilson line restricted by $P_M$ can only give VEVs to the triplets and antitriplets.
After orbifolding we have the effective scalars corresponding to the extra dimensional part of the broken gauge fields behaving like flavons. The gauge fields decompose as $$A_m=\left(\begin{array}{cc} G_\mu-Z'_\mu/3 & \phi\\
\bar{\phi}& Z'_\mu
\end{array}\right),$$ where the flavons in the $3,\overline{3}$ conjugate representations of $SU(3)$ are $$\phi=\frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}{c}A_5^{9}+iA_5^{10} \\ A_5^{11}+iA_5^{12} \\A_5^{13}+iA_5^{14}\end{array}\right),\ \ \ \ \bar{\phi}=\frac{1}{2}\left(A_5^{9}-iA_5^{10}, A_5^{11}-iA_5^{12},A_5^{13}-iA_5^{14}\right),$$ which can obtain general VEVs by fixing the Wilson line phase. The flavons, coming from the gauge fields, are real scalars arranged into the complex triplet and antitriplet representations as shown above which limits the possible VEVs. We note that there is only one independent complex scalar triplet and the other one is its complex conjugate. A general VEV in this triplet can always be rotated into the form $$\braket{\phi}\sim \left(\begin{array}{c} 0\\0\\a\end{array}\right),\ \ \ \braket{\bar{\phi}}\sim (0,0,a),
\label{eq:su4abc}$$ with arbitrary real $a$. In general this alignment breaks the $SU(3)\times U(1)\to SU(2)\times U(1)$ reducing the rank by 1.
Having more than one extra dimension will yield extra flavon pairs in conjugate representations. The commutation requirement between Wilson lines in this $SU(4)$ theory constrains the possible alignments of the second pair to be aligned as the first one. If one wants different flavon alignments from those above, one must consider the non commutative Fibre Bundle construction described in Sec. \[sec:noncom\]. However it is possible to envisage a proto-model just with the two flavons above, along the following lines.
Towards a model with fermions
-----------------------------
Let us assume all left-handed SM fermions $f= L,Q$ and $f^c=e^c,\nu^c,u^c,d^c$ transform as $4$ dimensional representations of $SU(4)$ and propagate in the bulk. The boundary condition breaks the multiplet $4\to 3_{-1/3}+1_1$ and only the triplet has a zero mode. The fermions modes would be denoted as $(f,f^c)_{3,1}^{n}$, where the subscript labels the $SU(3)$ triplet or singlet component and the superscript is $0$ for the zero mode and $KK$ otherwise. The low energy fermions are always the zero mode triplets $f,f^c=(f,f^c)^0_3$ so that their sub-indices and super-indices can be suppressed without confusion.
The Higgs doublet is fixed on a brane, which only has $SU(3)\times U(1)$ flavour symmetry, and is chosen to be an $SU(3)$ flavour singlet with a $U(1)$ charge of $-2$. There is no ordinary Yukawa term for the zero modes, so that all of them are higher order. However the Higgs does have a renormalizable coupling to $SU(3)$ singlet fermions.
There are two effective flavon triplets for each extra dimension $\phi_i,\bar\phi_i$. After integrating the KK modes we can obtain the effective Yukawa terms $$\mathcal{L}_Y\sim Tr\Big[f f^c H \left(\bar{\phi}\bar{\phi}+\bar\phi\phi^\dagger+\phi^\dagger\bar{\phi}+\phi^\dagger\phi^\dagger\right)\Big],
\label{effyuk}$$ where all the $f, f^c$ are the $SU(3)$ triplet zero modes and the corresponding subscripts and superscripts are suppressed. If there is more than one extra dimension, there would be these terms for each flavon as well as all possible mixings.
The terms in Eq. \[effyuk\] come from diagrams as in figure \[fig:kk\]. The flavon insertions can be either $\bar{\phi}$ or $\phi^\dagger$ of which there are 4 possibilities and generate the 4 different terms. The KK modes are always Dirac fermions, have masses of the order of the compactification scale and do the chirality flip by themselves. The KK modes mediate all higher order terms and their couplings to the zero modes and gauge fields are fixed, which fixes completely the Yukawa couplings
![Diagram that generates the effective Yukawa terms mediated by KK modes.[]{data-label="fig:kk"}](1.pdf)
Although the heavy KK modes mediate the effective Yukawa couplings, such diagrams are not very suppressed since the KK mode mass and the Wilson line VEVs $\braket{\phi,\bar{\phi}}$ are both the same order, namely the compactification scale. KK mode mediated higher order terms are possible but all involve insertions of $\phi\bar\phi$ contractions which do not change the mass matrix structure. This way the first order terms completely determine the structure of the mass matrices.
A model along these lines would have an effective $SU(3)$ gauged flavour symmetry where all fermions are triplets. Flavons in the triplet and antitriplet representation are generated automatically with aligned VEVs, resulting from the extra dimensional components of the underlying $SU(4)$ gauged flavour symmetry. No flavons need to be added by hand, nor is any alignment potential required. However a realistic model would require additional flavons with independent vacuum alignments. This requires some further discussion about Wilson lines and orbifolds, and this is the subject of the next section.
Wilson Lines and Orbifolds Revisited {#Wilson}
====================================
We now present a general definition of the Wilson Lines together with the orbifold conditions where we assume a spacetime with $M$ dimensions, where $m=0,...,M$. Such a formalism may be necessary for a realistic model where several flavons with independent vacuum alignments are required.
Wilson lines and fibre bundles
-------------------------------
In compact 5d periodic spaces the Wilson line is defined by the phase in Eq. \[eq:psi2pir\]. This can be rewritten with the translation operator in the 5th dimension $$\Psi(x,y+2\pi R)=e^{2\pi R \partial_5}\Psi(x)=e^{i2\pi R P_5}\Psi(x)=e^{i\beta^a T_a}\Psi(x),$$ where $P_5$ is the momentum operator which is the generator of translations. We can see that defining the Wilson line gauge transformation is equivalent to changing the momentum operator to include an element of the gauge algebra $$P_5\to P_5-\beta^a T_a /2\pi R.$$
The Wilson line mechanism can be implemented in any number of dimensions by generalizing the momentum operator to include an element of the gauge algebra $$P_m\to P_m-\beta^a_m T_a/2\pi R_m,$$ which would generate a VEV in the same way described in section \[sec:wl\] for the extra dimensional components of the gauge fields $$\braket{A_m^a}=\beta^a_m/2\pi R_m,$$ generalizing Eq. \[Wilsonvev\] for more extra dimensions.
In gauge theories, the fields do not live only in the Minkowski manifold but in a fibre bundle whose base is the Minkowski spacetime $\mathcal{M}^M$ and the fibre is a Lie group $G$. A gauge theory is built in such way that all physical observables are blind to the choice of a section (local gauge invariance). This means that the fibre bundle is not a trivial product $\mathcal{M}^M\times G $ since it has a twist defined by $\beta^a_m$. This induces a preferred section of the fiber bundle, which is similar (and in the case where $\alpha$ a linear function, equivalent) to a Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking (SSB). However this SSB happens in the gauge group as well as in the Poincaré group, breaking Lorentz symmetry. 4d Lorentzian symmetry must be unbroken, but in ED, the extra dimensional part of the Poincaré group disappear after compactification and they can be broken.
To summarize, the Wilson line mechanism is equivalent to choosing a twist in the fibre bundle so that the translation operator also involves a gauge transformation, leaving a preferred section and inducing SSB. Choosing a specific twist means to choose the VEV alignment.
Wilson lines and the Poincaré group
-----------------------------------
We can generalize any of the transformations generated by the extra dimensional Poincaré group, not just translations. To generalize the rotation operator we need at least 2 extra dimensions.
Wilson lines are generalizations of the extra dimensional translation operators which generate an effective VEV and spontaneous symmetry breaking. Orbifold identifications are related to generalizations of the extra dimensional parity operators $\mathcal{P}_m$ and extra dimensional rotations which are defined by the Lorentz generators $M_{mn}$. These break the symmetry at low energies by only leaving zero modes to the fields that commute with the chosen gauge transformation. The orbifold identification must be a discrete operation from the group $SO(M-4)\times \mathbb{Z}_2^{M-4}$, leaving the 4d Poincaré group unbroken.
These generalizations can be applied simultaneously to the extra dimensional part of the Poincaré group $SO(M,1)\ltimes T^M$ when complying with its algebra $$\begin{split}[P_m, P_n] &= 0,\\
\frac{ 1 }{ i }~[M_{mn}, P_r] &= \eta_{mr} P_n - \eta_{nr} P_m,\\
\frac{ 1 }{ i }~[M_{mn}, M_{rs}] &= \eta_{mr} M_{ns} - \eta_{ms} M_{nr} - \eta_{nr} M_{ms} + \eta_{ns} M_{mr},
\label{eq:poin}
\end{split}$$ which is generalized to $O(M,1)\ltimes T^M$ by including the parity operators $$\begin{split}
(\mathcal{P}^m)^2&=1,\\
[\mathcal{P}^m,P_n]&=-2\delta^m_n\ P_n\mathcal{P}_m,\\
[\mathcal{P}^m,M_{rs}]&=-2(\delta^m_r+\delta^m_s)\ M_{rs}\mathcal{P}_m,
\end{split}$$ where this limits the possible VEVs that can be generated through Wilson lines in a specific orbifold.
We conclude that using the Wilson line mechanism together with orbifolding in any number of dimensions is equivalent to generalizing the momentum, Lorentz and parity operators to include an element of the algebra of the gauge group $G$ generated by $T_a$ $$\begin{split}
\mathcal{P}^m &\to e^{i\alpha^{ma}T_a} \mathcal{P}^m,\\
P_m &\to P_m-\beta^a_m T_a/2\pi R_m,\\
M_{mn}&\to M_{mn}-\gamma^a_{mn}T_a,
\end{split}$$ where all indices must be $m>3$ to preserve 4d Poincaré symmetry. Since the canonical Poincaré generators obviously comply with the algebra, the chosen twist in $(O(M,1)\ltimes T^M)\times G$ must comply with $$\begin{split}
[T_a, T_b]&=f_{ab}^{\ \ c}T_c,\\
\beta^a_m \beta^b_nf_{ab}^{\ \ c} &= 0,\\
\frac{ 1 }{ i } \gamma_{mn}^a\beta_r^bf_{ab}^{\ \ c} &= \eta_{mr} \beta_n^c - \eta_{nr} \beta_m^c,\\
\frac{ 1 }{ i }~\gamma_{mn}^a\gamma_{rs}^b f_{ab}^{\ \ c} &= \eta_{mr} \gamma_{ns}^c- \eta_{ms} \gamma_{nr}^c - \eta_{nr} \gamma_{ms}^c + \eta_{ns} \gamma_{mr}^c,\\
(e^{i\alpha^{ma}T_a})^2&=1,\\
e^{i\alpha^{ma}T_a}\beta_n^cT_c&=-\delta_n^m \beta_n^c T_ce^{i\alpha^{ma}T_a},\\
e^{i\alpha^{ma}T_a}\gamma_{rs}^c T_c&=-(\delta^m_r+\delta^m_s)\ \gamma_{rs}^c T_ce^{i\alpha^{ma}T_a},
\label{eq:poinga}
\end{split}$$ where $f_{ab}^{\ \ c}$ are the structural constants of the gauge algebra. The constraints regarding parity are simplified In the 5d case, these constraints reduce to Eq. \[eq:pupu\].
Even though commuting Wilson lines by themselves do not reduce rank, together with the generalized parity and rotation transformations, rank reduction may happen [@Forste:2005rs].
Non-commuting Wilson lines {#sec:noncom}
--------------------------
In this subsection, we focus in the case with 2 extra spatial dimensions. In a compact periodic space any field would have the independent boundary conditions $$\begin{split}
\Psi(x,y_5+2\pi R_5,y_6)&=e^{i\beta_5^a T_a}\Psi(x,y_5,y_6),\\
\Psi(x,y_5,y_6+2\pi R_6)&=e^{i\beta_6^a T_a}\Psi(x,y_5,y_6),
\label{eq:psi56}
\end{split}$$ as in Eq. \[eq:psi2pir\] with 2 extra dimensions. This fixes the field to behave as $$\begin{split}
\Psi(x,y_5,y_6)&=e^{i\beta^a_5 yT_a/2\pi R_5+i\beta^a_6 yT_a/2\pi R_6}\ \tilde{\Psi}(x,y),\\ \tilde{\Psi}(x,y_5,y_6)&=\tilde{\Psi}(x,y_5+2\pi R_5,y_6)=
\tilde{\Psi}(x,y_5,y_6+2\pi R_6),
\end{split}$$ which is the equivalent of Eq. \[eq:solpsi\] with 2 extra dimensions and commuting phases. In the Poincaré algebra from Eq. \[eq:poin\], the translation operators commute $$[P_5,P_6]=0.$$ If we were to comply with these conditions when upgrading the momentum operators to include an element of the gauge algebra, they would have to comply with Eq. \[eq:poinga\] $$\beta^a_5\beta^b_6f_{ab}^{\ \ c}=0,$$ which greatly diminishes the possible flavon alignments coming from Wilson lines. This equation is fulfilled when $\beta^a_5\propto\beta^b_6$ due to the antisymmetry of the lower indices, forcing both possible alignments to be equal. This equation is also fulfilled when the $\beta$’s are aligned in the directions where the structural constants vanish. Therefore we can have as many different alignments as the rank of the group. This is the usual Wilson line mechanism in arbitrary extra dimensions.
However the commutative requirement can be avoided. Non-commutative translations on EDs are well studied [@Guralnik:2001pv]. This is usually done by choosing the EDs to be the so called non-commutative torus. We could still have the usual (commutative) torus in extra dimensions, providing we introduce the generalized translation operators whose commutator is $$[P_5,P_6]=[\beta_5^a T_a,\beta_6^b T_b]=\beta^a_5\beta^b_6f_{ab}^{\ \ c} T_c=\theta_{56},$$ where $\theta^{56}$ is the fundamental object for non commutative geometry. However we have a special case for $\theta^{56}$ since it is an element of the gauge algebra. We have commutative translations up to a phase. We can have a usual commutative torus, but a non-commutative fibre bundle. The fields that live in the spacetime only, with trivial section on the fiber bundle (gauge singlets), only feel the usual translation operators of the usual commutative torus. The fields that are not gauge singlets obtain a phase which has a non-commutative dependence of the EDs. This implies that the fibre bundle is built from the usual 4d spacetime $\mathcal{M}^4$, the usual commutative torus $T^2$, and the gauge group $G$ through a non trivial multiplication of them $\mathcal{M}^4\times (T^2\ltimes G)$. This way we can have a generalization without having to comply with all the commutative relations for Wilson lines and orbifold boundary conditions [@deAnda:2018yfp].
Consider the $\star$, the Moyal star product [@Guralnik:2001pv] $$f(z)\star g(z)=e^{i\theta_{56}\partial_5\partial_{6'}}f(z)g(z')|_{z'\to z},$$ where $z=(y_5,y_6)$ are the extra dimensional coordinates while $z$ and $z'$ are independent variables. This product allows us to find a consistent $\Psi$ from Eq. \[eq:psi56\] with non-commutative phases as $$\begin{split}
\Psi(x,y_5,y_6)&=e^{i\beta_5^bT_by_5/2\pi R_5}\star e^{i\beta_6^bT_by_6/2\pi R_6}\tilde{\Psi}(x,y_5,y_6)\\
&=e^{i\beta_\star^b(y_5,y_6)T_b}\tilde{\Psi}(x,y_5,y_6)
\end{split}$$ where $\tilde{\Psi}$ are normal commutative and periodic functions of the extra dimensions. This is just a phase $\beta_\star$ and can be reabsorbed through a gauge transformation $$\Psi(x,y_5,y_6)\to e^{-i\tilde{\beta}_*^b(y_5,y_6)T_b}\star\Psi(x,y_5,y_6)=\tilde{\Psi}(x,y_5,y_6),$$ where $\tilde{\beta}_*^b$ is chosen to cancel the phase and it need not be equal to $\beta_*^b$ since the phases are mutiplied with the non trivial Moyal product. The gauge fields transform as $$A_{5,6}\to \tilde{A}_{5,6}+(\partial_{5,6} e^{i\beta_\star^bT_b})\star e^{-i\tilde{\beta}_*^b(y_5,y_6)T_b},$$ which after compactification is just a constant and behaves like an effective 4d constant VEV $$\braket{A_{5,6}}=\int dy^2 (\partial_{5,6} e^{i\beta_\star^bT_b})\star e^{-i\tilde{\beta}_*^b(y_5,y_6)T_b}$$ as a consequence of the Wilson line mechanism. This way we have different alignments for the VEVs $\braket{A_{5,6}}$, by choosing different noncommuting $\beta_{5,6}^b T_b$. This is the same Wilson line mechanism described in Eqs. \[eq:psi2pir\]-\[Wilsonvev\] replacing the product of noncommutative phases by the Moyal star product.
This is in line with the special case of noncommutative geometry, where the noncommutative tensor $\theta^{56}$ is just a gauge transformation. This is equivalent to the usual commutative geometry with non trivial boundary conditions in a non abelian group [@Saraikin:2000dn].
In general we assume that the compactification scale, identified with the flavour breaking scale, is quite high. After compactification the only trace of the noncomutativity we have is the noncommuting Wilson lines and only usual commuting functions with normal products. With this setup we can obtain effectively as many flavons as extra dimensions, where each flavon associated with each extra dimension has an independent vacuum alignment.
Conclusion
==========
In this paper we have proposed the idea that flavons can emerge from extra dimensional gauge fields, referred to as GFU analogous to GHU. In such an approach there is a gauged family symmetry in extra dimensions and the flavons are the extra dimensional components of the gauge field. This identifies the compactification scale with the flavour breaking scale which is much larger than the electroweak scale, making such an idea viable in principle. In 5d models, this provides a simple mechanism to align the VEVs of the flavons through a combination of Wilson line and orbifold symmetry breaking, with the Poincaré group structure determining the relation of the different resulting flavon VEVs. No flavons need to be added by hand, nor is any alignment potential required.
We have presented some simple 5d examples of GFU based on $SO(3)$ and $SU(4)$ gauged family symmetry. In the simplest case of $SO(3)$, the adjoint representation is a triplet, leading a flavon triplet with non-trivial VEV alignment. In the case of $SU(4)$ we have shown how this gauge group is broken upon compactification (through orbifolding and Wilson lines) to an $SU(3)\times U(1)$ gauge group in 4d, together with a triplet and antitriplet flavons which develops a VEV, further breaking the rank of the gauge group. We have taken the first steps to constructing a model along these lines by introducing fermions and showing how they may couple to the flavons in a consistent way via heavy KK modes, leading to effective higher order operators which play the role of Yukawa couplings.
Finally, we have presented a general formalism for Wilson lines and orbifolds, in any number of dimensions, including non-commutative fibre bundles, which may be useful for aligning additional flavons as required for constructing realistic models.
Acknowledgements {#acknowledgements .unnumbered}
----------------
We would like to thank Patrick K.S. Vaudrevange for carefully reading the manuscript and for his useful comments. SFK acknowledges the STFC Consolidated Grant ST/L000296/1 and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme under Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreements Elusives ITN No. 674896 and InvisiblesPlus RISE No. 690575. AA acknowledges support from CONACYT project CB-2015-01/257655 and SNI (México).
[99]{}
Y. Hosotani, Phys. Lett. [**126B**]{} (1983) 309. Y. Hosotani, Phys. Lett. [**129B**]{} (1983) 193.
P. Candelas, G. T. Horowitz, A. Strominger and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B [**258**]{}, 46 (1985);\
E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B [**258**]{}, 75 (1985). J. P. Derendinger, L. E. Ibanez and H. P. Nilles, Nucl. Phys. B [**267**]{}, 365 (1986);\
B. R. Greene, K. H. Kirklin, P. J. Miron and G. G. Ross, Nucl. Phys. B [**278**]{}, 667 (1986); Nucl. Phys. B [**292**]{}, 606 (1987);\
S. Ferrara, C. Kounnas and M. Porrati, Phys. Lett. B [**206**]{}, 25 (1988);\
A. Font, L. E. Ibanez, F. Quevedo and A. Sierra, Nucl. Phys. B [**331**]{}, 421 (1990);\
A. E. Faraggi, Nucl. Phys. B [**428**]{}, 111 (1994) \[hep-ph/9403312\]; Phys. Lett. B [**398**]{}, 88 (1997) \[hep-ph/9611219\];\
J. R. Ellis, A. E. Faraggi and D. V. Nanopoulos, Phys. Lett. B [**419**]{}, 123 (1998) \[hep-th/9709049\].
Y. Sakamura, Phys. Rev. D [**76**]{} (2007) 065002 \[arXiv:0705.1334 \[hep-ph\]\]. A. D. Medina, N. R. Shah and C. E. M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D [**76**]{} (2007) 095010 \[arXiv:0706.1281 \[hep-ph\]\]. L. J. Hall, Y. Nomura and D. Tucker-Smith, Nucl. Phys. B [**639**]{} (2002) 307 \[hep-ph/0107331\]. I. Gogoladze, Y. Mimura and S. Nandi, Phys. Lett. B [**560**]{} (2003) 204 \[hep-ph/0301014\].
Y. Hosotani, S. Noda, Y. Sakamura and S. Shimasaki, Phys. Rev. D [**73**]{} (2006) 096006 \[hep-ph/0601241\]. C. A. Scrucca, M. Serone, L. Silvestrini and A. Wulzer, JHEP [**0402**]{} (2004) 049 \[hep-th/0312267\]. I. Antoniadis, K. Benakli and M. Quiros, New J. Phys. [**3**]{} (2001) 20 \[hep-th/0108005\]. G. Panico, M. Serone and A. Wulzer, Nucl. Phys. B [**739**]{} (2006) 186 \[hep-ph/0510373\]. S. F. King and C. Luhn, Rept. Prog. Phys. [**76**]{} (2013) 056201 \[arXiv:1301.1340 \[hep-ph\]\]. L. J. Hall, H. Murayama and Y. Nomura, Nucl. Phys. B [**645**]{} (2002) 85 \[hep-th/0107245\].
F. J. de Anda, S. F. King, E. Perdomo and P. K. S. Vaudrevange, arXiv:1910.04175 \[hep-ph\]. A. Hebecker and M. Ratz, Nucl. Phys. B [**670**]{} (2003) 3 \[hep-ph/0306049\]. A. Hebecker and J. March-Russell, Nucl. Phys. B [**625**]{} (2002) 128 \[hep-ph/0107039\]. S. Forste, H. P. Nilles and A. Wingerter, Phys. Rev. D [**72**]{} (2005) 026001 \[hep-th/0504117\].
Z. Guralnik and J. Troost, JHEP [**0105**]{} (2001) 022 \[hep-th/0103168\]. F. J. de Anda and S. F. King, JHEP [**1810**]{} (2018) 128 \[arXiv:1807.07078 \[hep-ph\]\].
K. Saraikin, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. [**91**]{} (2000) no.4, 653 \[Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. [**118**]{} (2000) no.4, 755\] \[hep-th/0005138\].
[^1]: E-mail: `[email protected]`
[^2]: E-mail: `[email protected]`
[^3]: E-mail: `[email protected]`
[^4]: A special case to solve $1 = P U P U$ with $P^2 = 1$ is given by choosing a $U$ with $P U = U P$. Then $U^2 = 1$ must hold. A similar mechanism of rank reduction was also discussed in [@Hebecker:2003jt].
[^5]: There can exist rank preserving VEVs in the case that the group has generators that can satisfy $e^{i2\beta^aT_a}=0$ for nonzero $\beta^a$.
[^6]: We shall assume that the Wilson lines are continuous, i.e. the phases in Eqs.\[eq:uso3\],\[eq:uso31\] are not quantised, which may not always be the case [@Forste:2005rs].
[^7]: Note that there is a second rank preserving solution when $\beta^1=\beta^2=0$ and $\beta^3=\pi$ which is equivalent to the flavon alignment $$\braket{\phi}=\frac{1}{2 R}\left(\begin{array}{c} 0\\ 0 \\ 1
\end{array}\right),$$ which preserves the remaining $U(1)$ and has no freedom on the absolute value. Note that this is consistent with the fact that any field, must be an eigenstate of the P operator. Therefore the allowed VEV alignments are the eigenvectors of the ${\mathrm{diag}}(-1,-1,1)$ matrix.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'The Baikal neutrino telescope NT200 takes data since 1998. In 2005, the deployment of three additional strings for common operation with NT200 was finished. We describe the physics program and the design of the new telescope named NT200+ and present selected physical results obtained with NT200. First results from NT200+ will be presented at the conference.'
author:
- |
V. Aynutdinov$^a$, V.Balkanov$^a$, I. Belolaptikov$^g$, N.Budnev$^b$, L. Bezrukov$^a$, D. Borschev$^a$, A.Chensky$^b$, I. Danilchenko$^a$, Ya.Davidov$^a$,Zh.-A. Djilkibaev$^a$, G. Domogatsky$^a$, A.Dyachok$^b$, S.Fialkovsky$^d$,O.Gaponenko$^a$, O. Gress$^b$, T. Gress$^b$, O.Grishin$^b$, R.Heller$^h$, A.Klabukov$^a$, A.Klimov$^f$, K.Konischev$^g$, A.Koshechkin$^a$, L.Kuzmichev$^c$, V.Kulepov$^d$, B.Lubsandorzhiev$^a$, S.Mikheyev$^a$, M.Milenin$^d$, R.Mirgazov$^b$, T.Mikolajski$^h$, E.Osipova$^c$, A.Pavlov$^b$, G.Pan’kov$^b$, L.Pan’kov$^b$, A.Panfilov$^a$, , D.Petuhov$^a$, E.Pliskovsky$^g$, P.Pokhil$^a$, V.Polecshuk$^a$, E.Popova$^c$, V.Prosin$^c$, M.Rozanov$^e$, V.Rubtzov$^b$, B.Shaibonov$^a$, A.Shirokov$^c$,Ch. Spiering$^h$, B.Tarashansky$^b$, R.Vasiliev$^g$, E.Vyatchin$^a$, R.Wischnewski$^h$, I.Yashin$^c$, V.Zhukov$^a$\
(a) Institute for Nuclear Reseach, Russia\
(b) Irkutsk State University,Russia\
(c) Skobeltsin Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Russia\
(d) Nizni Novgorod State Technical University, Russia\
(e) St.Petersburg State Marine Technical University, Russia\
(f) Kurchatov Institute, Russia\
(g) Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia\
(h) DESY, Zeuthen, Germany
title: 'The Baikal neutrino experiment: from NT200 to NT200+ '
---
Introduction
============
The Baikal Neutrino Telescope is operated in Lake Baikal, Siberia, at a depth of 1.1 km, 3.6 km from the shore. Deep Baikal water is characterized by an absorption length of $L_{abs}(480 $nm$) =20\div 24$ m, a scattering length of $L_s -30\div 70$ m and a strongly anisotropic scattering function with a mean cosine of scattering angle $0.85\div 0.9$. The present stage of telescope, NT200+ (fig.\[nt\_pl\]) was put into operation at April 9th, 2005. The new configuration consists of the old NT200 telescope plus the three new, external strings, placed 100 m from the center of NT200. With the new strings, the sensitivity of Baikal telescope for very high energy neutrinos increases by a factor 4. Below we describe the new telescope and present selected physical and methodical results. Results on the search for high energy neutrinos and relativistic monopoles are presented in separate papers.
NT200+
======
NT200 plus the new external strings form NT200+. NT200 [@NT200] with 192 optical modules(OM), was put into operation in 1998. An umbrella-like frame carries 8 strings 72 m long, each with 24 pairwise arranged OMs. The optical modules contain 37-cm photodetectors QUASAR-370 [@QUASAR], which have been developed specially for our project. The OMs are grouped in pairs along the strings. The PMs of a pair are switched in coincidence in order to suppress background from bioluminescence and PM noise. A pair defines a *channel*.
A *trigger* is formed by requiring $\geq N$*hits*( with *hit* refering to a channel) within 500 ns. $N$ is typically set to 3 or 4. This signals is used as a *common* stop for TDCs. For the common operation with the external strings the signal of the *trigger* is sent through 1.2 km coaxial cable to the [*underwater*]{} DAQ center of NT200+ (20 m below surface, distributed over several glass spheres). For time calibration of NT200, two nitrogen lasers, placed on the top and below the central string, are used. The light pulse from the first laser ($\lambda =$ 480 nm) is sent to all OMs via optical fibers with equal length, the light pulse from the second is emitted straight to the water.
External strings 140 m long are placed at 100 meter distance from the center of NT200, each with 12 OMs grouped in pairs like in NT200. The upper pairs are at approximately the same level as the bottom OMs of NT200. On each external string, an independent *string trigger* is formed in case the number of fired channels is $\geq$2 within 1000 ns. *String triggers* are sent to the underwater DAQ center, where the time difference between *string trigger* and the *trigger* of NT-200 is measured. This information is used to relate the times within an event of NT200 OMs and OMs of the externals strings. For time offset synchronization of the external strings with respect to NT200, an additional laser, placed on a separate string (see fig.\[nt\_pl\] left bottom) is used. This laser emits ten times more photons ($\ge 10^{12}$) than the old ones and fires OMs on all externals strings as well as on NT200. With this laser it was found that the jitter of the time difference between OMs of NT200 and OMs of the external strings is smaller than 3 ns.
{width="35.00000%"} {width="35.00000%"}\
Our search strategy for high energy neutrinos relies on the detection of the Cherenkov light emitted by cascades, produced by neutrino interactions in a large volume mostly below NT200. The detection volume for NT200+ is shown in fig.\[v131\]. With three additional strings, it is increased by four times. With NT200+ we also significantly increase the accuracy of the position of the cascade vertex (fig.\[map\]) within the volume spanned by the outer strings, and based on that the energy reconstruction.
For the first 1000 hours of operation, $7.5\cdot10^4$ common events (detected by NT200 and external strings) have been collected. Data analysis is in progress and first results will be presented at the conference.
Selected results
================
Atmospheric Muon Neutrinos
--------------------------
The signature of charged current muon neutrino events is a muon crossing the detector from below. Muon track reconstruction algorithms and background rejection have been described elsewhere [@rec-nu]. Compared to [@rec-nu], the analysis of the 5-year sample (1038 days for pure operation time) was optimized for higher signal passing rate, and accepting a slightly higher contamination of 15-20% fake events. A total of 372 upgoing neutrino candidates were found. From Monte-Carlo simulations, a total 385 atmospheric neutrino and background events are expected. The skyplot of these events is shown in fig.\[fig3\].
Search for Neutrinos from WIMP Annihilation
-------------------------------------------
The search for WIMPs with the Baikal neutrino telescope is based on a possible signal of nearly vertically upward going muons, exceeding the flux of atmospheric neutrinos. The applied cuts for event selection [@wimp] result in a detection area of 1800 m$^2$ for vertically upward going muons. In 502 days effective data taking, 24 events with $-0.75 \ge \cos(\theta) \ge -1$ have been found, in accordance with expectations for atmospheric neutrinos. Regarding these 24 events as being induced by atmospheric neutrinos, one can derive an upper limit on the excess flux of muons from the center of the Earth due to annihilation of neutralinos (fig.\[fig4\]).
{width="47.00000%"} {width="47.00000%"}
Search for acoustic signals at Lake Baikal
-------------------------------------------
In 2001–2003, a series of experiments has been performed to detect acoustic signals in water from EAS. For these experiments, a small EAS array was deployed on the ice. A special acoustic device recorded sound signals for a 100 ms interval after the EAS time. This device consists of 4 hydrophones arranged at the vertices of a pyramide with 1.5 m side length. During these experiments many bipolar signals from close to the EAS core were detected, but due the very high level of acoustic noise we cannot prove that these signals are really from EAS[@GVD]. In 2005, four hydrophones with a new data acquisition system were tested in situ. With this device it is possible to reconstruct the direction to the sound source with one degree accuracy. During a 20-hour test with the device at 100 m depth it was found that the majority of the acoustic signals comes from the surface of the lake and only a few from below the horizon. No signals from directions steeper than 20$^0$ below horizon have been detected. In 2006 we plan to operate this device together with NT200+.
Conclusion and Outlook
======================
The Baikal Neutrino telescope NT200, operated from 1998, was upgraded to NT200+, a 10-Mton detector with a sensitivity of approximately $\Phi_{\nu_e}E^2\sim$ 10$^{-7}$ cm$^{-2}$ sr$^{-1}$GeV for diffuse neutrino fluxes at $E \ge 10^2$ TeV. NT200+ will search for neutrinos from AGNs, GRBs and other extraterrestrial sources, neutrinos from cosmic ray interactions in the Galaxy as well as high energy atmospheric muons with $E_{\mu} \ge 10$ TeV,and also for exotic particles (monopoles, strangles, Q-balls). In parallel to this short term goal, we started research $\&$ development activities towards a Gigaton Volume Detector [@GVD] in Lake Baikal. Our last results on the search for high energy neutrinos and relativistic monopoles and more detailed descriptions of the data acquisition system of NT200+ are presented in separate papers on this conference [@rf1; @rf2].\
*This work was supported by the Russian Ministry of Education and Science, the German Ministry of Education and Research and the Russian Fund of Basic Research (gratns 05-02-17476, 04-02-17289, 04-02-16171, 05-02-16593), by the Grant of the President of Russia NSh-1828.2003.2, and by NATO-Grant NIG-981707*
[99]{}
I. Belolaptikov et al., Astropart.Phys. 7, 263 (1997).
R. I. Bagduev et al., Nucl.Instr.Meth. A420, 138(1999).
I. Belolaptikov et al., Astropart.Ph. 12, 75(1999)
V. Balkanov et al., Nucl. Phys.B (Proc.Suppl.)118, 363(2003)
V. Balkanov et al., Nucl.Phys.(Proc.Suppl.) 91, 438(2000)
C. Spiering. astro-ph/0503122 (2005)
V. Aynutdinov et al.\[Baikal Collaboration\], these proceedings: ger-wischnewski-R-abs1-og25-oral
V. Aynutdinov et al.\[Baikal Collaboration\], these proceedings: ger-wischnewski-R-abs1-he23-poster
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We study density wave instabilities in a doubly-degenerate Fermi-Fermi mixture with $SU(2)\times SU(2)$ symmetry on a square lattice. For sufficiently large on-site inter-species repulsion, when the two species of fermions are both at half-filling, two conventional ($s$-wave) number density waves are formed with a $\pi$-phase difference between them to minimize the inter-species repulsion. Upon moving one species away from half-filling, an unconventional density wave with $d_{xy}$-wave symmetry emerges. When both species are away from the vicinity of half-filling, superconducting instabilities dominate. We present results of a functional renormalization-group calculation that maps out the phase diagram at weak couplings. Also, we provide a simple explanation for the emergence of the $d_{xy}$-density wave phase based on a four-patch model. We find a robust and general mechanism for $d_{xy}$-density-wave formation that is related to the shape and size of the Fermi surfaces. The density imbalance between the two species of fermions in the vicinity of half-filling leads to phase-space discrepancy for different inter-species Umklapp couplings. Using a phase space argument for leading corrections in the one-loop renormalization group approach to fermions, we show that the phase-space discrepancy in our system causes opposite flows for the two leading intra-species Umklapp couplings and that this triggers the $d_{xy}$-density-wave instability.'
author:
- 'Chen-Yen Lai$^1$'
- 'Wen-Min Huang$^{1,2,3}$'
- 'David K. Campbell$^4$'
- 'Shan-Wen Tsai$^1$'
title: '$d_{xy}$-density wave in fermion-fermion cold atom mixtures'
---
Introduction
============
Experimental realizations of quantum degenerate Fermi-Fermi mixtures have opened a new arena for the study of quantum many-body phenomena in cold atom systems [@Shin; @Wille:2008gq; @Spiegelhalder:2009hw; @Spiegelhalder:2010hq; @Hara:2011gq]. In these multi-component systems, many different types of fermionic superfluids have been proposed and studied [@Yip:2011eq; @Inaba:2012jd]. For population imbalanced mixtures, a number of exotic unconventional pairing states, some of which do not occur in normal condensed-matter systems, have been investigated theoretically, including Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov [@Larkin:1965uw] superfluidity in the vicinity of phase separation [@Radzihovsky], interior gap superfluidity [@Liu], and $p$-wave pairing [@Bulgac; @Raghu; @Patton; @Lai]. However, once strong Fermi surface (FS) nesting is present, instead of superconducting pairing, density wave instabilities dominate [@Lai; @WM] and may exhibit higher angular momentum order. Unconventional density waves (density waves with non-zero angular momentum) [@Campbell; @Marston; @Nayak] have recently been proposed theoretically for ultracold fermionic atoms. By loading fermionic dipolar atoms [@Lu] and molecules [@Ni; @Chotia; @Wu] onto optical lattices, unconventional density-wave instabilities may arise from the long-range and anisotropic dipole-dipole [@Yamaguchi; @Mikelsons; @Parish; @Bhongale1] or quadrupolar [@Bhongale3] interactions. By creating a Kagome optical lattice [@Jo], a bond order wave can be stabilized,resulting from sublattice interference effects [@Kiesel1], in the presence of a sufficiently large nearest-neighbor repulsive term [@Wang12; @Kiesel2].
In this paper, we study density wave instabilities of a doubly-degenerate fermion mixture, such as $^6$Li and $^{40}$K [@Spiegelhalder:2010hq; @Taglieber], on a square lattice. As illustrated in the insert figure of Fig. \[fig:phase\]a, we describe the system as a simple Hamiltonian, $H=H_t^c+H_t^f+H_{\rm int}$, where $$\begin{aligned}
&&\hspace{-0.4cm}H_t^a=-t\sum_{\langle ij\rangle,\alpha}\left(a^{\dag}_{i\alpha}a_{j\alpha}+{\rm H.c.}\right)-\mu_a \sum_{i}n_{ai},\label{eq:Ht}\\
&&\hspace{-0.4cm} H_{\rm int}=\sum_{i}U_{\rm cc}n_{ci\uparrow}n_{ci\downarrow}+U_{\rm ff}n_{fi\uparrow}n_{fi\downarrow}+U_{\rm cf}n_{ci}n_{fi}\label{eq:Hint},\end{aligned}$$ where $a=c/f$ stands for the $c/f$-fermions of the two species, $\alpha$ is the spin index. $H_t^a$ is described the tight-binding model with a nearest-neighbor hopping amplitude $t_c=t_f=t$, and $\mu_a$ is the chemical potential of the $a$-fermions. We also include the inter- and intra-species interactions, represented as $U_{\rm cc(ff)}$ and $U_{\rm cf}$ with the definition $n_{ai}=n_{ai\uparrow}+n_{ai\downarrow}=\sum_{\alpha}a^{\dag}_{i\alpha}a_{i\alpha}$.
![(Color online) (a) Contour plot of a square optical lattice with a fermion-fermion mixture, where lighter regions correspond to lower potential energy and darker to higher energy, and real-space picture of the $d_{xy}$-CDW state for one species of fermions. (b) The phase diagram is parameterized by the chemical potential of $c$-fermions, $\mu_c$, and the ratio of inter- and intra-species interactions, $U_{\rm cf}/U_{\rm ff}$. (c) The FS patches used in this study ($M=36$ on each FS), as well as the FS for $\mu_f=0$ and $\mu_c=-0.1$, and (d) corresponding $d_{xy}$ order parameter for $f$- and $c$-fermions (orange and green dots, respectively). []{data-label="fig:phase"}](Phase1){width="45.00000%"}
We consider the limit of weak repulsive interactions and employ a standard functional renormalization-group (FRG) method [@Shankar:1994vy; @Metzner:2012jv; @Zanchi:2000vv; @Tsai:2001bh], which allows us to treat the inter- and intra-species interactions on an equal footing. We find that for large intra-species repulsion, the behavior is reminiscent of a single $SU(2)$ species, i.e. two independent spin-density waves (SDW), while both species are near half-filling. However, in the presence of an inter-species repulsion sufficiently larger than the intra-species repulsion, two unconventional charge-density waves (CDW) start to emerge, and the phase diagram is showed in Fig. \[fig:phase\]b. When both species are at half-filling, the ground state consists of two conventional $s$-wave number density waves, here denoted as charge-density-wave (CDW) in analogy with number density waves in electron systems. As one species is moved away from half-filling, a $d_{xy}$-wave CDW instability becomes dominant.
To further elucidate the physics behind the $d_{xy}$-CDW formation, we develop a simple four-patch model with intra- and inter-species Umklapp couplings that provides an analytical understanding of the competition between $s$- and $d_{xy}$-CDWs. A density imbalance between the two species of fermions in the vicinity of half-filling leads to different effective phase spaces for the different inter-species Umklapp couplings. Using reasoning similar to Shankar’s phase space argument for determining one-loop RG flow equations [@Shankar:1994vy], we explain how the phase-space discrepancy for the inter-species Umklapp couplings leads to opposite RG flows for the different intra-species Umklapp couplings, triggering the $d_{xy}$-CDW instability. By varying the densities of the two species around half-filling, we also study the range of fillings for which this regime of unconventional $d_{xy}$-CDW can be realized.
The remainder of the paper is arranged as follows. In Sec. \[sct:modelandfrg\], we introduce our theoretical approach, the functional renormalization group (FRG) method. In Sec. \[sct:result\], the main part of this paper, we present a detailed discussion of the phase diagram of the system and physical mechanism leading to the $d_{xy}$-CDW instability. In Sec. \[sct:exp\], we discuss a proposed experimental realization of this model and the detection of $d_{xy}$-CDW order parameter. Finally, in Sec. \[sct:conclusion\] we present a summary of our present results and discuss prospects for future work.
![(Color online) (a) A four-point vertex function $g({{\bm k}}_1,{{\bm k}}_2,{{\bm k}}_3)$. (b)-(f) One-loop diagrams that contribute to the renormalization of a four-point vertex.[]{data-label="fig:rgeq"}](rgeq){width="45.00000%"}
The Functional Renormalization Group for two species of fermions {#sct:modelandfrg}
================================================================
We consider the limit of weak repulsive interactions, $0<U_{\rm cc}, U_{\rm ff}, U_{\rm cf}< \mathcal{W}$, where $\mathcal{W}$ is the full energy band width. We employ a standard FRG method [@Shankar:1994vy; @Metzner:2012jv; @Zanchi:2000vv; @Tsai:2001bh] to obtain the low-energy behavior for this system. We calculate the corrections to the interaction vertices to one-loop[@Zanchi:2000vv], which correspond to the diagrams shown in Figs. \[fig:rgeq\](b)-\[fig:rgeq\](f). For the fermion-fermion mixture we consider, each solid line in these diagrams also carries a spin ($\alpha = \uparrow, \downarrow$) and a species ($a=c, f$) index. Since the Hamiltonian, Eqs. (\[eq:Ht\]) and (\[eq:Hint\]), has $SU(2)$ symmetry for each species, it is enough to calculate only vertices in which fermions with antiparallel spins interact, as vertices involving fermions with the same spin can be obtained from these by imposing $SU(2)$ symmetry. Depending on the species indices, we have intra-species interaction vertices for each species or inter-species interaction vertices. Since the Hamiltonian also has global $U(1)$ symmetry and interactions are of the density-density type, to each fermion annihilated (incoming fermion line) corresponds a fermion with the same spin and species indices being created (outgoing line). Thus we can write any effective interaction term in the form: $g_{abba}({\bm k}_1,{\bm k}_2,{\bm k}_3,\ell)\psi^{\dag}_{a\alpha}({\bm k}_1)\psi^{\dag}_{b\beta}({\bm k}_2)\psi_{b\beta}({\bm k}_3)\psi_{a\alpha}({\bm k}_1+{\bm k}_2-{\bm k}_3)$, in momentum space, with fermionic field $\psi({\bm k}=(k_x,k_y))$, and $\ell=\ln(\mathcal{W}/\Lambda)$, with $\Lambda$ the running UV energy cut-off. All interaction terms require momentum conservation as ${\bm k}_1 + {\bm k}_2 = {\bm k}_3 + {\bm k}_4$ shown in Fig. \[fig:rgeq\](a). The species indices appear as a pair with the same spin; this follows from the density-density nature of the inter-species interaction in the Hamiltonian, as mentioned above.
To solve the RG flow equations numerically, we discretize the Fermi surfaces into patches [@Zanchi:2000vv] and label the interaction vertices in terms of patch-indices, instead of momenta, writing $g({{\bm k}}_1,{{\bm k}}_2,{{\bm k}}_3,\ell)\rightarrow g(i_1,i_2,i_3,\ell)$. In our numerical calculations, we divide each Fermi surface into 36 patches. The configuration of the Fermi surface patches is illustrated in Fig. \[fig:phase\](c). After carrying out the one-loop RG calculations, we obtain the flow of four-point vertices in terms of the RG scale, $\ell$, and three independent momenta, $g({{\bm k}}_1,{{\bm k}}_2,{{\bm k}}_3,\ell)$. The momenta are discretized in the numerical implementation, but we describe here the general analysis in terms of momenta. The signature for the occurrence of an instability of the Fermi liquid state in the RG approach is the development of run-away flows. To determine the dominant instability, we look at the quartic interaction terms in the effective action in the form $\sum_{{{\bm k}},{{\bm p}}}\mathcal{V}^{(\ell)}_{\rm op}({{\bm k}},{{\bm p}})\hat{\mathcal{O}}^{\dag}_{{{\bm k}}}\hat{\mathcal{O}}_{{{\bm p}}}$, with $\hat{\mathcal{O}}_{{{\bm k}}}$ being a term bilinear in the fermion fields and corresponding to the order parameter (OP) of superconducting pairing (SC), charge density wave (CDW), spin-density wave (SDW), ferromagnetism (FM) or Pomeranchuk (PI) instabilities[@Zanchi:2000vv; @Zhai:2009br]. The amplitudes for each instability channel are matrices and are related to the couplings $g$ by $$\begin{aligned}
\mathcal{V}^{(\ell)}_{SC_{s(t_0)}}({{\bm k}},{{\bm p}})&=&\frac12\left[g({{\bm k}},-{{\bm k}},-{{\bm p}},{{\bm p}},\ell)\pm g(-{{\bm k}},{{\bm k}},-{{\bm p}},{{\bm p}},\ell)\right]\nonumber\\
\mathcal{V}^{(\ell)}_{SDW}({{\bm k}},{{\bm p}})&=&-g({{\bm p}},{{\bm k}},{\bar{{{\bm p}}}},{\bar{{{\bm k}}}},\ell)\label{vsdw}\\
\mathcal{V}^{(\ell)}_{CDW}({{\bm k}},{{\bm p}})&=&2g({{\bm k}},{{\bm p}},{\bar{{{\bm p}}}},{\bar{{{\bm k}}}},\ell)-g({{\bm p}},{{\bm k}},{\bar{{{\bm p}}}},{\bar{{{\bm k}}}},\ell)\nonumber\\
\mathcal{V}^{(\ell)}_{FM}({{\bm k}},{{\bm p}})&=&-g({{\bm p}},{{\bm k}},{{\bm p}},{{\bm k}},\ell)\nonumber\\
\mathcal{V}^{(\ell)}_{PI}({{\bm k}},{{\bm p}})&=&2g({{\bm k}},{{\bm p}},{{\bm p}},{{\bm k}},\ell)-g({{\bm p}},{{\bm k}},{{\bm p}},{{\bm k}},\ell) \ ,\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ where $\bar{{{\bm k}}}={\bm k+\bm Q}$, $\bar{{{\bm p}}}={\bm p + Q}$, and ${\bm Q}=(\pi,\pi)$ is the nesting vector at half-filling, and the momenta, ${{\bm k}}$, ${{\bm p}}$, lie on either of the Fermi surfaces. The singlet(triplet) SC instability channel is denoted by $SC_s$($SC_{t_0}$) and corresponds to the plus(minus) sign in the right-hand side of the first equation above. In the numerical implementation, each Fermi surface is discretized into 36 patches and ${{\bm k}}$, ${{\bm p}}$ can be labeled by a discrete patch index that goes from 1 to $2\times 36$ \[Fig. \[fig:phase\](c)\]. As defined above, the $\mathcal{V}^{(\ell)}_{\rm op}({{\bm k}},{{\bm p}})$ contain both intra- and inter-species couplings, depending on whether the momenta ${{\bm k}}$ and ${{\bm p}}$ are on the same Fermi surface or on different Fermi surfaces, and thus ${{\bm k}}$ and ${{\bm p}}$ have 2$\times$36 values. Explicitly, each $\mathcal{V}$ matrix contains 4 blocks with species indices in the form $\left(\begin{matrix} g_{\rm ffff} & g_{\rm fccf} \cr g_{\rm cffc} & g_{\rm cccc} \end{matrix}\right)$ , and each block has dimension $36\times36$. For each order parameter channel, we can further diagonalize $\mathcal{V}^{(\ell)}_{\rm op}({{\bm k}},{{\bm p}})$ into $$\mathcal{V}^{(\ell)}_{\rm op}({{\bm k}},{{\bm p}})=\sum_{i,oo^\prime}w_{\rm op}^{(i)}(\ell)\eta_o f^{(i)*}_{\rm op}({{\bm k}},o,\ell)\eta_{o^\prime} f^{(i)}_{\rm op}({{\bm p}},o^\prime,\ell), \nonumber$$ with $i$ being a decomposition index, and where now we explicitly indicate the species index $o$ and $o^{\prime}$ for $c$- or $f$-fermions. The leading instability can be determined by the most negative eigenvalue $w_{\rm op}^{\rm min}$ (largest magnitude), and the corresponding symmetry of the instability ($s$-, $p$-, and $d$-wave etc.) is given by the form factor $f^{\rm min}_{\rm op}({{\bm k}})$. The sign structure factor $\eta_{o}=1(-1)$ stands for in-phase (out-phase) between species on the bipartite square lattice. For instance, the two $s$-wave form factors, $f^{\rm min}_{CDW}({{\bm k}},o)$ and $f^{\rm min}_{CDW}({{\bm p}},o^\prime)$, carry different signs, $\eta_o=1$ and $\eta_{o^\prime}=-1$, in the $s_{\pm}$-CDW phase in Fig. \[fig:phase\](b).
Results {#sct:result}
=======
With fixed parameters (in units of $t$), $\mu_f=0$ (half-filling) and $U_{\rm ff}=U_{\rm cc}>0$, the phase diagram parameterized by $\mu_c$ and the dimensionless ratio of intra- and inter-species interaction $U_{\rm cf}/U_{\rm ff}$ is illustrated in Fig. \[fig:phase\](b). For small inter-species interactions, the species at half-filling ($f$-fermions) has an SDW instability. With increasing $U_{\rm cf}/U_{\rm ff}$, if both species are at half-filling, an $s$-wave CDW emerges, where the order parameters for the two species have a $\pi$-phase difference, referred to as an $s_{\pm}$-CDW here. This is analogous to the $s_{\pm}$-wave pairing in iron-pnictide superconductors [@FWang] but in the particle-hole channel. By relabeling the square lattice as a bipartite lattice with A,B sub-lattices, the real-space picture of the $s_{\pm}$-CDW phase is that $f$($c$)-fermions only occupy $A(B)$ sub-lattice sites to avoid the strong inter-species repulsion.
Keeping the $f$-fermions at half-filling, we find phase transitions from $s_{\pm}$-CDW to $d_{xy}$-CDW by increasing $|\mu_c|$, and from SDW to $d_{xy}$-CDW by enhancing $U_{\rm cf}/U_{\rm ff}$. In Fig. \[fig:phase\](c), we show the FS of the two species for $\mu_f=0$ and $\mu_c=-0.1$ and indicate the FS patches used in our numerical RG implementation. We also show, in Fig. \[fig:phase\](d), the corresponding form factors of $d_{xy}$-CDW for $U_{\rm cf}/U_{\rm ff}=2.5$, obtained from decomposing the CDW coupling into eigenfunctions and plotting the dominant one close to the instability. The larger magnitude of the form factor for $f$-fermions indicates that the $d_{xy}$-instability is mainly driven by the species at half-filling, with ordering of the $c$-fermions resulting from a proximity effect. As we increase the density imbalance, the $d_{xy}$-CDW phase requires larger $U_{\rm cf}/U_{\rm ff}$ to dominate over SDW. The real-space picture of $d_{xy}$-CDW is sketched in Fig. \[fig:phase\](a), where the crosses indicate higher densities along next-nearest-neighbor bonds of alternating plaquettes [@Nayak], $O_{\rm dCDW}(\bm{r})=e^{i\bm{Q}\cdot\bm{r}}\sum_{\alpha;i,j=\pm1}a^{\dag}_{\alpha}(x,y)a_{\alpha}(x+i,y+j)$.
![(Color online) Sketches of two inter-species couplings, $g_1^{\rm cf}=g_{\rm cffc}(1,1,3,3)$ (left) and $g_{2}^{\rm cf}=g_{\rm cffc}(1,4,2,3)$ (right), for two different fillings of c-fermions. In (b), the deviation of the FS for $\mu_c=-0.1$ from the one at half-filling is intentionally enlarged for better visualization.[]{data-label="fig:gcf"}](gcf){width="7.2cm"}
A Four-Patch g-ology Model
--------------------------
To understand the physics leading to the development of the $d_{xy}$-CDW, we first explore the competition between the $s$-CDW and the $d_{xy}$-CDW of a single species ($f$-fermions) at half-filling. By decoupling the quartic interaction terms in the form $\sum_{\bm k,\bm p}\mathcal{V}^{(\ell)}_{\rm CDW}(\bm k,\bm p)\hat{\mathcal{O}}^{\dag}_{\bm k}\hat{\mathcal{O}}_{\bm p}$, with $\hat{\mathcal{O}}_{\bm k}$ being a term bilinear in the fermion fields and corresponding to the order parameter of CDW, we find that $\mathcal{V}_{\rm CDW}(\bm{k},\bm{p})\simeq g_{\rm ffff}(\bm{k},\bm{p},\bm{p}+\bm{Q},\bm{k}+\bm{Q})$ exhibits a negative eigenvalue when CDW dominates over the SDW [@FWang]. In this case, for simplicity, we can divide the FS into four patches around $k_F=(\pi/2,\pi/2)$, $(-\pi/2,\pi/2)$ $(-\pi/2,-\pi/2)$ and $(\pi/2,-\pi/2)$ and consider only the scatterings occurring on these pieces of the FS \[Fig. \[fig:gcf\](a)\]. Under the dihedral symmetry of a square lattice, three independent Umklapp couplings associated with momentum transfer $\bm{k}_4-\bm{k}_1=\bm{Q} = (\pi,\pi)$ can be defined: $g_1=g_{\rm ffff}(1,1,3,3)$, $g_{2}=g_{\rm ffff}(1,4,2,3)$ and $g_3=g_{\rm ffff}(1,3,1,3)$. The matrix of $\mathcal{V}_{\rm CDW}$ then takes the following form: $$\begin{aligned}
\mathcal{V}_{\rm CDW}\simeq\left(\begin{array}{cccc}
g_{1} & g_{2} & g_3 & g_{2} \\
g_{2} & g_{1} & g_{2} & g_3 \\
g_3 & g_{2} & g_{1} & g_{2} \\
g_{2} & g_3 & g_{2} & g_{1}
\end{array}\right),\end{aligned}$$ with eigenvectors $\bm{\Phi}_s=(1,1,1,1)$, $\bm{\Phi}_d=(1,-1,1,-1)$, $\bm{\Phi}_{p_1}=(1,0,-1,0)$ and $\bm{\Phi}_{p_2}=(0,1,0,-1)$, and corresponding eigenvalues $E_s=g_{1}+2g_{2}+g_3$, $E_d=g_{1}-2g_{2}+g_3$ and $E_{p_{1/2}}=g_{1}-g_3$. Thus, once the CDW instability is triggered, the competition between $d$- and $s$-wave channels is clear: $d_{xy}$-CDW ($s$-CDW) has the most negative eigenvalue and is therefore dominant when $g_{2}>0$ ($g_{2}<0$).
![(Color online) The flows of the most dominant couplings in the RG procedure, $g_{\rm ffff}(5,4,24,23)$ and $g_{\rm ffff}(5,32,14,23)$, are illustrated for $\mu_c=0$ (dashed and solid blue lines) – note that these two lines are on top of each other, indicating that the two couplings have the same magnitude in this case; and $\mu_c=-0.1$ (dashed and solid orange lines). The two couplings are illustrated in the insets.[]{data-label="Umklapp"}](Umklapp2){width="6.7cm"}
We now introduce the second species of fermions ($c$-fermions), with filling slightly less than half and with the FS also divided into four patches (Fig. \[fig:gcf\]). By introducing an inter-species interaction and defining the Umklapp couplings $g_1^{\rm cf}=g_{\rm cffc}(1,1,3,3)$, $g_{2}^{\rm cf}=g_{\rm cffc}(1,4,2,3)$ and $g_3^{\rm cf}=g_{\rm cffc}(1,3,1,3)$, the one-loop RG equations for $g_1$ and $g_2$ are given by $$\begin{aligned}
&&\hspace{-0.3cm}\frac{dg_{1}}{d\ell}=\mathcal{A}_{1jk}g_jg_k+\sum_{n=1}^3\mathcal{B}_{1nn}\left(g_n^{\rm cf}\right)^2+\mathcal{B}_{122}\left(g_2^{\rm cf}\right)^2,\label{eq:g1}\\
&&\hspace{-0.3cm}\frac{dg_2}{d\ell}=\mathcal{A}_{2jk}g_jg_k+2\mathcal{B}_{212}g_1^{\rm cf}g_2^{\rm cf}+2\mathcal{B}_{223}g_2^{\rm cf}g_3^{\rm cf}\label{eq:g2},\end{aligned}$$ where $\mathcal{A}_{ijk}$ and $\mathcal{B}_{ijk}$ are the kernels of the RG equations for intra- and inter-species couplings, respectively, and $i,j,k$ represent coupling indices. $\mathcal{A}_{ijk}$ contains contributions from all one-loop diagrams \[Figs. \[fig:rgeq\](b) to \[fig:rgeq\](f)\]. $\mathcal{B}_{ijk}$ corresponds to a fermionic bubble \[Fig. \[fig:rgeq\](d)\] for the $c$-fermions, obtained when two inter-species couplings are contracted to generate a correction to the intra-species $f$-fermion coupling. The $\mathcal{B}_{ijk}$’s are therefore always negative and correspond to an effective attractive interaction between the $f$-fermions, mediated by the $c$-fermions. Note that when the bare inter-species interaction is weak, $U_{\rm cf}/U_{\rm ff}\ll1$, and the $\mathcal{B}_{ijk}g_j^{\rm cf} g_k^{\rm cf} $ terms can be neglected. In this case, the $\mathcal{A}_{ijk}g_jg_k$ intra-species terms eventually drive $g_{1}$ and $g_{2}$ to large positive values, leading to an SDW instability.
{width="90.00000%"}
When both species are at half-filling, the two FS overlap and the three inter-species Umklapp couplings ($g_{1}^{\rm cf}$, $g_{2}^{\rm cf}$, $g_{3}^{\rm cf}$) exhibit equivalent phase space; the same applies to the intra-species Umklapp couplings. In this circumstance, increasing the bare value of the inter-species interaction in Eq. (\[eq:g1\]) and (\[eq:g2\]) eventually leads both $g_{1}$ and $g_{2}$ to flow to negative values and gives rise the $s$-CDW instability. When one species is away from half-filling, the four patches on its rounded-square FS are slightly shifted from the ones at half-filling. In Fig. \[fig:gcf\](b), we illustrate the two FS and corresponding momentum shifts between the patches. As shown in the left panel of Fig. \[fig:gcf\](b), for fermions on the FS, the net momentum transfer in the inter-species process $g_{1}^{\rm cf}$ is no longer equal to a reciprocal lattice vector but has a small misfit corresponding to the shift in the position of the Fermi patches for the $c$-fermions. This is also true for the $g_{3}^{\rm cf}$ processes. As high-energy modes are eliminated during the RG transformation, these two couplings will have a reduced phase-space in which they can occur and are not allowed when only fermions on the FS remain. However, the misfit in the momentum transfer for scattering $c$-fermions across two parallel patches (momentum transfer ${\bm Q} - {\bm \delta}$) can be compensated in $g_{2}^{\rm cf}$ by having the $f$-fermions scatter by ${\bm Q} + {\bm \delta}$. As sketched in Fig. \[fig:gcf\](b) (right panel), this scattering is allowed by momentum and energy conservation due to the nesting of the FS (flat parallel patches in our simple model). Thus, after moving one species away from half-filling, following Shankar’s phase-space argument [@Shankar:1994vy], particle-hole diagrams involving $g_{2}^{\rm cf}$ have an extended phase space in which they are non-zero, while ones involving $g_{1}^{\rm cf}$ and $g_{3}^{\rm cf}$ can be ignored to leading order in $d\Lambda$. As a consequence, the RG equations, Eq. (\[eq:g1\]) and (\[eq:g2\]), can be rewritten as $$\begin{aligned}
&&\frac{dg_1}{d\ell}=\mathcal{A}_{1jk}g_jg_k+2\mathcal{B}_{122}\left(g_2^{\rm cf}\right)^2\ , \\
&&\frac{dg_2}{d\ell}=\mathcal{A}_{2jk}g_jg_k\ ,\end{aligned}$$ where $g_2$ receives no contribution from inter-species terms. The inter-species interaction term still drives $g_1$ to a negative value (effective mediated attraction). The other Umklapp interaction $g_2$, however, is renormalized only by intra-species repulsion and flows to positive values. The flow to negative values leads to CDW instability, and the asymmetry in the Umklapp components means that the CDW instability has $d_{xy}$-wave order parameter ($g_1<0$ and $g_2>0$).
Vertex Flows under the full FRG
-------------------------------
Going back to the full FRG calculation with 2$\times$36 patches, we confirm the simple mechanism demonstrated with the four-patch model by identifying, among the RG flows for all the couplings, the ones that are most divergent and looking at their behavior. In Fig. \[Umklapp\], the RG flows of the most dominant intra-species couplings, $g_{\rm ffff}(5,4,24,23)$ and $g_{\rm ffff}(5,32,14,23)$, are plotted for two different cases: $c$-fermions at half-filling ($\mu_c=0$) and away from half-filling ($\mu_c = -0.1$). When both species are at half-filling, the two couplings are equal to each other and flow to large negative values (dashed and solid blue lines), leading to the $s$-CDW instability. However, as expected from the four-patch analysis, once the $c$-fermions are away from half-filling ($\mu_c=-0.1$), the two couplings are renormalized in opposite ways (dashed and solid orange lines), resulting in $d_{xy}$-CDW.
Although we can explain the $d_{xy}$-CDW phase using a simple four-patch model and analytical arguments involving RG flows of just a few Umklapp couplings, it is instructive to see how some of the vertex functions renormalize. In Fig. \[fig:vflow\], we show a snapshot at a given “RG-time" $\ell$ of a few coupling functions. Since each vertex $g_{abba}(i_1,i_2,i_3,\ell)$ is a function of three free patch-indices, we fix one of them, $i_2=1$, where the positions of each patch on the two Fermi surfaces are illustrated in Fig. \[fig:phase\](c). For $f$-fermions at half-filling ($\mu_f=0$) and fixing $U_{\rm cc}=U_{\rm ff}= t$, we show couplings for different $\mu_c$ and $U_{\rm cf}/U_{\rm ff}$ corresponding to the $s_{\pm}$-CDW, $d_{xy}$-CDW, and SDW phases. Fig. \[fig:vflow\](a) and Fig. \[fig:vflow\](b) show inter-species coupling $g_{\rm cffc}(i_1,i_2=1,i_3,\ell)$ and $f$-fermions intra-species coupling $g_{\rm ffff}(i_1,i_2=1,i_3,\ell)$, respectively, for $\mu_c=0$ and $U_{\rm cf}/U_{\rm ff}=2.0$, corresponding to a point in the phase diagram where $s_{\pm}$-CDW occurs \[shown in Fig. \[fig:phase\](a)\]. Moving the $c$-fermions away from half-filling leads to a region of $d_{xy}$-CDW. Fig. \[fig:vflow\](c) shows the intra-species coupling $g_{\rm ffff}(i_1,i_2=1,i_3,\ell)$ for this case ($\mu_c=0.1t$, $U_{\rm cf}/U_{\rm ff}=2.0$). Decreasing the inter-species coupling from this point so that $U_{\rm ff}>U_{\rm cf}$ leads to the SDW phase. The intra-species coupling $g_{\rm ffff}(i_1,i_2,i_3,\ell)$ for this case is shown in Fig. \[fig:vflow\](d) ($\mu_c=0.1t$, $U_{\rm cf}/U_{\rm ff}=0.5$).
It is easy to see from the panels in Fig. \[fig:vflow\] that flows to strong coupling under RG are related to Fermi surface nesting due to half-filling. There are two types of such couplings. The first type contains couplings of the form $g_{\rm ffff}(i_1,1,i_1+{\bf Q})$, which correspond to the four pieces of diagonal lines (dark red) in Fig. \[fig:vflow\](d). These couplings account for the nesting between ${{\bm k}}_1$ and ${{\bm k}}_3$, and represent the SDW channel in Eq. (\[vsdw\]). The second type contains $g_{\rm ffff}(i_1,1,27)$ couplings, which make up the vertical straight line at $i_3=27$ in all four panels of Fig. \[fig:vflow\] \[blue line in Fig. \[fig:vflow\](b), in particular\], and are responsible for the CDW channel. One can also see some sub-dominant vertices in these figures. The pairing vertex, $g_{\rm ffff}(i_1,i_2=-i_1,i_3)$ corresponds to the horizontal line at $i_1=19$. The major diagonal line at 45$^\circ$, going from the lower left to the upper right corners of the panels, corresponds to the backward scattering, $g_{\rm ffff}(i_1,i_2,i_3=i_1)$. The forward scattering, $g_{\rm ffff}(i_1,i_2,i_3=i_2)$, is the vertical straight line located at $i_3=1$. Finally, there are four small squares, which are enhanced due to scattering of a particle from one patch to another belonging to the same flat side of the nested Fermi surface.
![(Color online) The phase diagram parameterized by $\mu_c$ and $\mu_f$. Note the large difference in scales between $\mu_c$ and $\mu_f$.[]{data-label="fig:PDmu"}](PD_mu2){width="45.00000%"}
Starting from the $s_{\pm}$-CDW phase \[Fig. \[fig:vflow\](a) and \[fig:vflow\](b)\], the leading divergent couplings are of the second kind, $g_{\rm ffff}(i_1,1,27)$, and flow to negative values \[vertical line along $i_3=27$ in Fig. \[fig:vflow\](b)\], as we found in the four-patch model. The points along this vertical straight line of most divergent couplings have the same magnitude for all values of $i_1$, indicating an isotropic $s$-wave symmetry. Furthermore, the inter-species interaction, $g_{\rm cffc}(i_1,1,27)$, flows to strong positive values \[Fig. \[fig:vflow\](a)\], again with the same value for all $i_1$ patch indices. This sign difference between $g_{\rm ffff}$ and $g_{\rm cffc}$ indicates that the $s$-wave order parameter has a $\pi$-phase between the $f$- and $c$-fermions, and thus this corresponds to an $s_{\pm}$-CDW instability.
In Fig. \[fig:vflow\](d), intra-species couplings are almost unaffected by weak inter-species couplings, and the strongest flow is in the SDW channel, which is represented by the four separate pieces of diagonal red lines. Finally, in Fig. \[fig:vflow\](c), the couplings show that the nesting process, $g_{\rm ffff}(i_1,1,27)$, has alternating signs (red and blue in the vertical straight line at $i_3=27$). The sign alternation in the CDW form factor with four nodes, at $(\pm\pi,0)$ and $(0,\pm\pi)$, corresponds to $d_{xy}$-wave symmetry, instead of the more usual isotropic $s$-wave symmetry seen in Fig. \[fig:vflow\](b). The physics behind the emergence of this sign change and $d_{xy}$-symmetry is as explained before. The population imbalance between the two fermion species in the vicinity of FS nesting provides the two FS with displaced parallel portions, which is the key ingredient for the mechanism we propose for creating a $d_{xy}$-CDW with purely repulsive interactions.
The effective attractive interaction between $f$-fermions, mediated by the $c$-fermions, can also drive a BCS pairing instability if the nesting of the $f$-fermions FS is destroyed. To study the competition between pairing (SC) and density-wave instabilities, we explored the phase diagram parameterized by the chemical potentials of the two species, shown in Fig. \[fig:PDmu\] for $U_{\rm cc}=U_{\rm ff}=U_{\rm cf}/2.5$. The $d_{xy}$-CDW occurs as an intermediate phase between two limiting behaviors: $s_{\pm}$-CDW, when both species are at half-filling, and SDW, when one species is at half-filling and the other is far away from half-filling. Importantly, the $d_{xy}$ phase persists in a reasonably wide range of fillings of the minority species.
The Critical Temperatures
-------------------------
During the FRG calculation, the UV cutoff $\Lambda_l=\Lambda_0e^{-\ell}$ is reduced as the RG scale $\ell$ increases. The scale $\ell_c$ at which the divergence of the couplings occurs provides an estimate for the critical energy (and temperature) scale for the transition. We first use a small initial bare coupling, $U_{\rm cc}=U_{\rm ff}=0.2t$, and estimate the critical temperature for the $d_{xy}$-CDW transition. In Fig. \[fig:tc\](a), we show the critical temperature from our FRG calculation as a function of the ratio $U_{\rm cf}/U_{\rm ff}$, for $U_{\rm cc}=U_{\rm ff}=0.2t$, for a fixed value of $\mu_c=0.2t$. This corresponds to a vertical cut of the phase diagram shown in \[fig:phase\](b). There are two competing orders, SDW and $d_{xy}$-CDW, and their corresponding $T_c$ can be given in units of the Fermi temperature $T_{\rm F}$. The critical temperatures found for this case are small, less than $10^{-2} T_{\rm F}$. However the critical temperature is significantly larger for larger bare interaction strengths, as shown in Fig. \[fig:tc\](b) for $U_{\rm cc}=U_{\rm ff}=t$, where $T_c$ of the $d_{xy}$-CDW is more than 10% of $T_{\rm F}$. Both figures \[Fig. \[fig:tc\](a) and (b)\] show that the $T_c$ of SDW decreases as the ratio of initial bare interactions $U_{\rm cf}/U_{\rm ff}$ increases because it is stabilized by the on-site repulsion for the species at half-filling ($f$-fermions) and larger on-site inter-species repulsion $U_{\rm cf}$ acts against it. As the other competing order $d_{xy}$-CDW starts to dominate, its $T_c$ increases as the ratio increases. Larger initial on-site inter-species repulsion $U_{\rm cf}$ favors the $d_{xy}$-CDW instability. While the FRG approach only applies to weak-couplings, that is, bare coupling strengths small compared to the full energy bandwidth of the problem (of order $\mathcal{W}=8t$), the ratio of $U_{\rm cf}/U_{\rm ff}$ can be tuned to be very large, enhancing the value of $T_c$ for $d_{xy}$-CDW.
Ultracold atom experiments {#sct:exp}
==========================
Our predicted phase diagram should be experimentally realizable with recently achieved quantum degenerate Li-K mixtures [@Spiegelhalder:2010hq] or Li-Yb [@Hara:2011gq] on a square optical lattice. We point out that a sufficiently large inter-species interaction $U_{\rm cf}$ compared to the intra-species repulsion of the species at half-filling $U_{\rm ff}$ is needed to create the $d_{xy}$-CDW we propose here. Taking the $^6$Li-$^{40}$K mixture, for example, with $^{40}$K as the $f$-fermions at half-filling, one can tune $U_{\rm ff}$ with a magnetic Feshbach resonance ($U_{\rm ff} \simeq 0$ at around 210 Gauss). At magnetic fields in this range, the $^6$Li - $^6$Li interaction $U_{\rm cc}$ is small and repulsive, as is the interspecies interaction $U_{\rm cf}$. One can therefore use the $^{40}$K Feshbach resonance to tune the $U_{\rm cf}/U_{\rm ff}$ ratio to large values, as required for our predicted $d_{xy}$-CDW phase to occur. One may also combine magnetic field with confinement-induced resonance [@Petrov; @Olshanii; @Moritz]. To avoid breaking SU(2) symmetry, optical Feshbach resonances [@Fedichev; @Bohn] may also be explored. The all optical resonance has been used in fermionic systems [@Blatt; @Fu], including the $^6$Li-$^{40}$K mixture [@Spiegelhalder:2010hq]. Importantly, it is not necessary to have $U_{\rm ff} = U_{\rm cc}$ for our predictions to hold true. If these parameters are different, the phase diagram as a function of the ratio $U_{\rm cf}/U_{\rm ff}$ remains qualitatively unchanged, with no strong dependence on the value of $U_{\rm cc}$. Experimental candidates for realizing this mixture, such as $^6$Li-$^{40}$K mixture, have components with different values for their physical masses. The qualitative features of the phase diagram, however, do not require $t_{\rm f}=t_{\rm c}$. If the $c$-fermion, which is the species not at half-filling, is lighter than the $f$-fermion, the screening effect from $c$-fermions becomes even more effective than in the equal mass case, and the $d_{xy}$-CDW phase is further enhanced. If the $c$-fermions are heavier, the screening effect becomes less effective and, for $c$-fermions much heavier than $f$-fermions, the $d_{xy}$-CDW will eventually be completely suppressed. Therefore, for a $^6$Li-$^{40}$K mixture, having the $^{40}$K atoms be the $f$-fermions (half-filled) is more favorable for the emergence of $d_{xy}$-CDW order. These features provide more flexibility for the experimental realization of the $d_{xy}$-CDW phase we predict.
Experiments with $^6$Li-$^{40}$K mixtures[@Taglieber] have achieved $T_{\rm Li} = 0.34 T_F$ and $T_{\rm K} = 0.40 T_F$. The values we find for $T_c$ using FRG are only rough estimates, but they are of the same order of magnitude as these experimental values. As the calculation of $T_c$ indicates, a sufficiently large inter-species interaction ($U_{\rm cf}$) compared to the intra-species repulsion of the species at half-filling ($U_{\rm ff}$) is needed to create the $d_{xy}$-CDW phase with a realistic value for $T_c$.
Identification of order parameters with nonzero angular-momentum dependence is always a challenge topic in condensed matter systems, and requires measurement of the relative phase between different portions of the FS. Several methods have been proposed to perform such phase-sensitive measurements [@Carusotto; @Dao:2007gw; @Gritsev; @Pekker:2009vg; @Kitagawa], including a pump-probe scheme [@Pekker:2009vg] and an approach based on noise correlations[@Kitagawa]. The $d_{xy}$-CDW order parameter symmetry may also be detected via momentum-resolved spectroscopy [@Dao:2007gw; @Stewart:2008kt].
Summary and Conclusion {#sct:conclusion}
======================
In summary, we have studied a quantum degenerate Fermi-Fermi mixture on square lattice with different species density and interaction ratios. We have employed the FRG, which goes beyond the mean-field approximation, to determine phase diagram of the system and to evaluate corresponding critical temperatures. By keeping one species at half-filling and varying the other, we found several phases, such as $s_\pm$-CDW, SDW, and most important $d_{xy}$-CDW. When inter-species density-density interaction is strong enough, system is dominated by charge density waves. For a small density imbalance between different species, our FRG result shows that the $d_{xy}$-CDW dominates over the conventional $s_\pm$-CDW. To clarify the physics behind the formation of this unconventional charge density wave, we considered an simple four-patch model, which shows clearly that the density imbalance makes Umklapp interactions flow asymmetrically. Along with FRG calculation, our study has allowed us to understand the structure of the phase diagram on a qualitative level. Finally, we have also proposed an experimental realization of our theoretical system involving on Li - K mixture, and discussed how to fine tune the interaction ratios to achieve the parameter range necessary to observe the phenomena we predict. Based on current cold atom technology, we believe this experiment can be realized in the near future.
We thank L. Mathey, E. Timmermans, and I. B. Spielman for fruitful discussions. We also thank P. Chen for computational resources from NSC and NCTS, Taiwan and the Triton Affiliates and Partners Program (TAPP) of the San Diego Supercomputer Center. CYL and SWT acknowledge support from NSF under Grant DMR-0847801, from the UC-Lab FRP under Award number 09-LR-05-118602, and from the Army Research Office, Department of Defense under Award Number W911NF-13-1-0119. WMH acknowledges support from NSC Taiwan under Grant 101-2917-I-564-074.
[999]{}
E. Wille et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. [**100**]{}, 053201 (2008).
Y. Shin et al., Nature [**451**]{}, 689 (2008).
F. M. Spiegelhalder, [*et al.*]{}, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**103**]{}, 223203 (2009).
F. M. Spiegelhalder, [*et al.*]{}, Phys. Rev. A [**81**]{}, 043637 (2010).
H. Hara,Y. Takasu, Y. Yamaoka, J. M. Doyle, and Y. Takahashi, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**106**]{}, 205304 (2011).
S.-K. Yip, Phys. Rev. A [**83**]{}, 063607 (2011).
K. Inaba and S. Suga, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**108**]{}, 255301 (2012).
P. Fulde and R. A. Ferrell, Phys. Rev. [**135**]{}, A550 (1964); A. Larkin and Y. Ovchinnikov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz [**47**]{}, 1136 (1964) \[Sov. Phys. JETP [**20**]{}, 762 (1965)\].
L. Radzihovsky and D. E. Sheehy, Rep. Prog. Phys. [**73**]{} 076501(2010).
W. V. Liu and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**90**]{}, 047002 (2003)
A. Bulgac, M. McNeil Forbes, and A. Schwenk, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**97**]{}, 020402 (2006).
S. Raghu and S. A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. B [**83**]{}, 094518 (2011).
K. R. Patton and D. E. Sheehy, Phys. Rev. A [**83**]{}, 051607 (2011).
C.-Y. Lai, C. Shi, and S.-W. Tsai, Phys. Rev. B [**87**]{}, 075134 (2013).
W.-M. Huang, K. Irwin and S.-W. Tsai, Phys. Rev. A [**87**]{}, 031603(R) (2013). D. K. Campbell, J. T. Gammel, and E. Y. Loh, Phys. Rev. B [**42**]{}, 475 (2000).
J. B. Marston and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. B [**39**]{}, 11538 (1989).
C. Nayak, Phys. Rev. B [**62**]{}, 4880 (2000).
M. Lu, N. Q., Burdick and B. L. Lev, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**108**]{}, 215301 (2012).
K.-K. Ni [*et al.*]{}, Science [**322**]{}, 231 (2008).
A. Chotia et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. [**108**]{}, 080405 (2012).
C. H. Wu, [*at al.*]{}, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**109**]{}, 085301 (2012).
Y. Yamaguchi, T. Sogo, T. Ito and T. Miyakawa, Phys. Rev. A [**82**]{}, 013643 (2010).
K. Mikelsons and J. K. Freericks, Phys. Rev. A [**83**]{}, 043609 (2011).
M. M. Parish and F. M. Marchetti, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**108**]{}, 145304 (2012).
S. G. Bhongale, [*et al.*]{}, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**108**]{}, 145301(2012); Phys. Rev. A [**87**]{}, 043604 (2013).
S. G. Bhongale, [*et al.*]{}, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**110**]{}, 155301 (2013).
G.-B. Jo, [*et al.*]{}, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**108**]{}, 045305 (2012).
M. L. Kiesel and R. Thomale, Phys. Rev. B 86, 121105 (2012)
W.-S. Wang, Z.-Z. Li, Y.-Y. Xiang, Q.-H. Wang, Phys. Rev. B [**87**]{}, 115135 (2013).
M. L. Kiesel, C. Platt, R. Thomale, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**110**]{}, 126405 (2013).
M. Taglieber et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. [**100**]{}, 010401 (2008)
R. Shankar:1994vy, Rev. Mod. Phys. [**66**]{}, 129 (1994).
W. Metzner, [*et al.*]{}, Rev. Mod. Phys. [**84**]{}, 299 (2012) and references therein.
D. Zanchi and H. J. Schulz, Phys. Rev. B [**54**]{}, 9509 (1996); Phys. Rev. B [**61**]{}, 13 609 (2000).
Hui Zhai, Fa Wang, and Dung-Hai Lee, Phys. Rev. B [**80**]{}, 064517 (2009).
S.-W. Tsai and J. B. Marston, Can. J. Phys. [**79**]{}, 1463 (2001).
D. Jaksch and P. Zoller Annals of Physics [**315**]{}, 52 (2005).
T. Esslinger, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics [**1**]{}, 129 (2010).
C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. Julienne and E. Tiesinga, Rev. Mod. Phys. [**82**]{}, 1225 (2010).
A. Trenkwalder, C. Kohstall, M. Zaccanti, D. Naik,A. I. Sidorov, F. Schreck, and R. Grimm, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**106**]{}, 115304 (2011)
F. Wang, H. Zhai, Y. Ran, A. Vishwanath and D. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**102**]{}, 047005 (2009).
D. S. Petrov, M. Holzmann, and G. V. Shlyapnikov, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**84**]{}, 2551 (2000).
M. Olshanii, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**81**]{}, 938 (1998).
H. Moritz, T. Stöferle, K. Günter, M. Köhl, and T. Esslinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**94**]{}, 210401 (2005).
P. Fedichev, Yu. Kagan, G. Shlyapnikov, and J. Walraven, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**77**]{}, 2913 (1996).
J. Bohn and P. S. Julienne, Phys. Rev. A [**56**]{}, 1486 (1997).
S. Blatt, T. L. Nicholson, B. J. Bloom, J. R. Williams, J. W. Thomsen, P. S. Julienne, and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**107**]{}, 073202 (2011).
Z. Fu, P. Wang, L. Huang, Z. Meng, H. Hu, and J. Zhang, Phys. Rev. A [**88**]{}, 041601 (2013).
I. Carusotto and Y. Castin, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**94**]{}, 223202 (2005).
T. L. Dao, [*et al.*]{}, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**98**]{}, 240402 (2007).
V. Gritsev, E. Demler, and A. Polkovnikov, Phys. Rev. A [**78**]{}, 063624 (2008).
D. Pekker, R. Sensarma, and E. Demler, arXiv:0906.0931.
T. Kitagawa, A. Aspect, M. Greiner, and E. Demler, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**106**]{}, 115302 (2011)
J. Stewart, J. Gaebler, and D. Jin, Nature (London) [**454**]{}, 744 (2008).
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'In the present paper, we generalize some of the results on Kloosterman sums proven in [@BG] for prime moduli to general moduli. This requires to establish the corresponding additive properties of the reciprocal set $$I^{-1}=\{x^{-1}:\quad x\in I\},$$ where $I$ is an interval in the ring of residue classes modulo a large positive integer. We apply our bounds on multilinear exponential sums to the Brun-Titchmarsh theorem and the estimate of very short Kloosterman sums, hence generalizing our earlier work to the setting of general modulus.'
author:
- |
[J. Bourgain]{}\
\
\
\
- |
\
[M. Z. Garaev]{}\
\
\
\
title: Kloosterman sums in residue rings
---
¶
${\left(}
\def$[)]{} \#1[\#1]{} \#1[\#1]{}
\[lem\][Lemma]{} \[prop\][Proposition ]{} \[thm\][Theorem]{} \[cor\][Corollary]{} \[prob\][Problem]{} \[ques\][Question]{}
Introduction
============
In what follows, $\Z_m$ denotes the ring of residue classes modulo a large positive integer $m$ which frequently will be associated with the set $\{0,1,\ldots, m-1\}$. Given an integer $x$ coprime to $m$ (or an invertible element of $\Z_m$) we use $x^*$ or $x^{-1}$ to denote its multiplicative inverse modulo $m$.
Let $I$ be an interval in $\Z_m$. In the present paper we establish some additive properties of the reciprocal-set $$I^{-1}=\{x^{-1}:\quad x\in I\}.$$ We apply our results to estimate some double Kloosterman sums, to Brun-Titchmarsh theorem and, involving multilinear exponential sum bounds of general modulus, we estimate short Kloosterman sums. These extends some results of our work [@BG] from prime moduli to the general.
Throughout the paper we use the abbreviation $e_m(z):=e^{2\pi i z/m}$.
Statement of our results
========================
We start with the additive properties of reciprocal-set.
\[thm:kI\*=kI\* I=\[1,N\]\] Let $I=[1,N]$. Then the number $J_{2k}$ of solutions of the congruence $$x_1^*+\ldots+x_k^*\equiv x_{k+1}^*+\ldots+x_{2k}^*\pmod m,\qquad x_1,\ldots, x_{2k}\in I,$$ satisfies $$J_{2k}<(2k)^{90k^3}(\log N)^{4k^2}\Bigl(\frac{N^{2k-1}}{m}+1\Bigr)N^{k}.$$
The following statement is a version of Theorem \[thm:kI\*=kI\* I=\[1,N\]\], where the variables $x_j$ are restricted to prime numbers. By $\cP$ we denote the set of primes.
\[thm:kI\*=kI\* I=\[1,N\] prime\] Let $I=[1,N]$. Then the number $J_{2k}$ of solutions of the congruence $$x_1^*+\ldots+x_k^*\equiv x_{k+1}^*+\ldots+x_{2k}^*\pmod m,\qquad x_1,\ldots, x_{2k}\in I\cap\cP,$$ satisfies $$J_{2k}<(2k)^{k}\Bigl(\frac{N^{2k-1}}{m}+1\Bigr)N^{k}.$$
We recall that the incomplete Kloosterman sum is the sum of the form $$\sum_{x=M+1}^{M+N}e_m(ax^*+bx),$$ where $a$ and $b$ are integers, $\gcd(a,m)=1$. Here the summation over $x$ is restricted to $\gcd(x,m)=1$ (if the range of summation is empty, then we consider this sum to be equal to zero). As a consequence of the Weil bounds it is known that $$\Bigl|\sum_{x=1}^m e_m(ax^*+bx)\Bigr|\le \tau(m) m^{1/2},$$ see for example [@IwKo Corollary 11.12]. This implies that for $N<m$ one has the bound $$\Bigl|\sum_{x=M+1}^{M+N}e_m(ax^*+bx)\Bigr|< m^{1/2+o(1)}.$$ For $M=0$ and $N$ very small (that is, $N=m^{o(1)}$) these sums have been estimated by Korolev [@Kor].
The incomplete bilinear Kloosterman sum $$S=\sum_{x_1=M_1+1}^{M_1+N_1}\,\sum_{x_2=M_2+1}^{M_2+N_2}\alpha_1(x_1)\alpha_2(x_2)e_m(ax_1^*x_2^*),$$ where $\alpha_i(x_i)\in\C,\, |\alpha_i(x_i)|\le 1$, is also well known in the literature. When $M_1=M_2=0$ the sum $S$ (in a more general form in fact) has been estimated by Karatsuba [@Kar1; @Kar2] for very short ranges of $N_1$ and $N_2$.
Theorem \[thm:kI\*=kI\* I=\[1,N\]\] leads to the following improvement of the range of applicability of Karatsuba’s estimate [@Kar1].
\[thm:Kloost Karatsuba range\] Let $I_1=[1, N_1],\,
I_2=[1,N_2]$. Then uniformly over all positive integers $k_1,k_2$ and $\gcd(a,m)=1$ we have $$\begin{split}
\Bigl|\sum_{x_1\in I_1} \sum_{x_2\in I_2}\alpha_1(x_1) &\alpha_2(x_2)e_m(ax_1^*x_2^*)\Bigr|
< (2k_1)^{\frac{45k_1^2}{k_2}}(2k_2)^{\frac{45k_2^2}{k_1}}(\log m)^{2(\frac{k_1}{k_2}+\frac{k_2}{k_1})}\times \\
\times &\Bigl(\frac{N_1^{k_1-1}}{m^{1/2}}+\frac{m^{1/2}}{N_1^{k_1}}\Bigr)^{1/(2k_1k_2)}
\Bigl(\frac{N_2^{k_2-1}}{m^{1/2}}+\frac{m^{1/2}}{N_2^{k_2}}\Bigr)^{1/(2k_1k_2)}N_1N_2.
\end{split}$$
Given $N_1,N_2$ we choose $k_1,k_2$ such that $$N_1^{2(k_1-1)}<m\le N_1^{2k_1},\qquad N_2^{2(k_2-1)}<m\le N_2^{2k_2}$$ and the bound will be nontrivial unless both $N_1,N_2$ are within $m^{\varepsilon}$-ratio of an element of $\{m^{\frac{1}{2l}},\l\in
\Z_{+}\}$. Thus, we have the following
\[cor:Kloost Karatsuba rang\] Let $I_1=[1, N_1],\, I_2=[1,N_2]$, where for $i=1$ or $i=2$ $$N_i\not\in \mathop{\bigcup}_{j\ge 1} \, [m^{\frac{1}{2j}-\varepsilon},\, m^{\frac{1}{2j}+\varepsilon}].$$ Then $$\max_{(a,m)=1}\Bigl|\sum_{x_1=1}^{N_1}\sum_{x_2=1}^{N_2}\alpha_1(x_1) \alpha_2(x_2)e_m(ax_1^*x_2^*)\Bigr|<
m^{-\delta} N_1N_2$$ for some $\delta=\delta(\varepsilon)>0$.
We shall then apply our bilinear Kloosterman sum bound to the Brun-Titchmarsh theorem and improve the result of Friedlander-Iwaniec [@FrIw] on $\pi(x;q,a)$ as follows:
\[thm:BrunTitch\] Let $q~\sim x^{\theta}$, where $\theta<1$ is close to 1. Then $$\pi(x;q,a)<\frac{cx}{\phi(q)\log\frac{x}{q}}$$ with $c=2-c_1(1-\theta)^2$, for some absolute constant $c_1>0$ and all sufficiently large $x$ in terms of $\theta$.
Recall that for $(a,q)=1$, $\pi(x;q,a)$ denotes the number of primes $p\le x$ with $p\equiv a\pmod q.$ The constant $c_1$ is effective and can be made explicit. We mention that for primes $q$ Theorem \[thm:BrunTitch\] is contained in our work [@BG].
Finally, we shall apply multilinear exponential sum bounds from [@B2] (see Lemma \[lem:B2\] below) to establish the following estimate of a short linear Kloosterman sums.
\[thm:linear sqrt log m\] Let $N>m^{c}$ where $c$ is a small fixed positive constant. Then we have the bound $$\max_{(a,m)=1}\Bigl|\sum_{n\le N}e_m(an^*)\Bigr|< \frac{(\log\log m)^{O(1)}}{(\log m)^{1/2}}\,N,$$ where the implied constants may depend only on $c$.
This improves some results of Korolev [@Kor]. We also refer the reader to [@Kor1] for some variants of the problem. We remark that a stronger bound is claimed in [@KarKKR], but the proof there is in doubt.
Since $$\sum_{n=1}^m e_m(an^*)=\mu(m),$$ in Theorem \[thm:linear sqrt log m\] one can assume that $N<m$. We also note that the aforementioned consequence of the Weil bounds gives a stronger estimate in the case $N>m^{1/2+c_0}$ for any fixed constant $c_0$.
Lemmas
======
The following result, which we state as a lemma, has been proved by Bourgain [@B2]. It is based on results from additive combinatorics, in particular sum-product estimates. This lemma will be used in the proof of our results on short Kloosterman sums.
\[lem:B2\] For all $\gamma>0$ there exist $\varepsilon=\varepsilon(\gamma)>0,\, \tau=\tau(\gamma)>0$ and $k=k(\gamma)\in \Z_{+}$ such that the following holds.
Let $A_1,\ldots, A_k\subset \Z_q,$ $q$ arbitrary, and assume $|A_i|>q^{\gamma}$ $(1\le i\le k)$ and also $$\max_{\xi\in \Z_{q_1}}|A_i\cap \pi_{q_1}^{-1}(\xi)|<q_1^{-\gamma}|A_i|\quad {for\,\, all} \quad q_1| q,\, q_1>q^{\varepsilon}.$$ Then $$\max_{\xi\in \Z_{q}^{*}}\Bigl|\sum_{x_1\in A_1}\ldots \sum_{x_k\in A_k}e_q(\xi x_1\ldots x_k)\Bigr|<Cq^{-\tau}|A_1|\cdots |A_k|.$$
Here, the notation $|A\cap \pi_{q_1}^{-1}(\xi)|$ can be viewed as the number of solutions of the congruence $ x\equiv \xi
\pmod {q_1},\, x\in A.$
Clearly, the conclusion of Lemma \[lem:B2\] can be stated in basically equivalent form $$\max_{\xi\in \Z_{q}^{*}}\sum_{x_1\in A_1}\ldots \sum_{x_{k-1}\in A_{k-1}}\Bigl|\sum_{x_k\in A_k}e_q(\xi x_1\ldots x_{k-1} x_k)\Bigr|<Cq^{-\tau}|A_1|\cdots |A_k|.$$ Indeed applying the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, it follows that $$\begin{aligned}
\begin{split}
\Bigl(\sum_{x_1\in A_1}&\ldots \sum_{x_{k-1}\in
A_{k-1}}\Bigl|\sum_{x_k\in A_k}e_q(\xi x_1\ldots x_{k-1}
x_k)\Bigr|\Bigr)^2\le \\ & |A_1|\ldots |A_{k-1}|\sum_{x_k'\in A_k}
\Bigl|\sum_{x_1\in A_1}\ldots \sum_{x_k\in A_k}e_q(\xi x_1\ldots
x_{k-1}(x_k-x_k')\Bigr|.
\end{split}\end{aligned}$$ We fix $x_k'\in A_k$ such that $$\begin{aligned}
\begin{split}
\Bigl(\sum_{x_1\in A_1}&\ldots \sum_{x_{k-1}\in
A_{k-1}}\Bigl|\sum_{x_k\in A_k}e_q(\xi x_1\ldots x_{k-1}
x_k)\Bigr|\Bigr)^2\le \\ &|A_1|\ldots |A_{k-1}||A_k|
\Bigl|\sum_{x_1\in A_1}\ldots \sum_{x_{k-1}\in A_{k-1}}\, \sum_{x_k\in A_k'}e_q(\xi x_1\ldots
x_{k-1}x_k\Bigr|,
\end{split}\end{aligned}$$ where $A_k'=A_k-\{x_k'\}$. Then we observe that the set $A_k'$ also satisfies the condition of Lemma \[lem:B2\].
We need some facts from the geometry of numbers. Recall that a lattice in $\R^n$ is an additive subgroup of $\R^n$ generated by $n$ linearly independent vectors. Take an arbitrary convex compact and symmetric with respect to $0$ body $D\subset\R^n$. Recall that, for a lattice $\Gamma\subset\R^n$ and $i=1,\ldots,n$, the $i$-th successive minimum $\lambda_i(D,\Gamma)$ of the set $D$ with respect to the lattice $\Gamma$ is defined as the minimal number $\lambda$ such that the set $\lambda D$ contains $i$ linearly independent vectors of the lattice $\Gamma$. Obviously, $\lambda_1(D,\Gamma)\le\ldots\le\lambda_n(D,\Gamma)$. We need the following result given in [@BHW Proposition 2.1] (see also [@TaoVu Exercise 3.5.6] for a simplified form that is still enough for our purposes).
\[lem:latp\] We have $$|D\cap\Gamma|\le \prod_{i=1}^n \(\frac{2i}{\lambda_i(D,\Gamma)} + 1\).$$
Denoting, as usual, by $(2n+1)!!$ the product of all odd positive numbers up to $2n+1$, we get the following
\[cor:latpoints\] We have $$\prod_{i=1}^n \min\{\lambda_i(D,\Gamma),1\} \le \frac{(2n+1)!!}{
|D\cap\Gamma|}.$$
We also need the following lemma due to Karatsuba [@Kar1].
\[lem:Karatsuba\] The following bound holds: $$\begin{split}
\Bigl|\Bigl\{(x_1,\ldots,x_{2k})\in [1,N]^{2k}:&\quad \frac{1}{x_1}+\ldots+\frac{1}{x_k}=\frac{1}{x_{k+1}}+\ldots+\frac{1}{x_{2k}}\Bigr\}\Bigr|\\
< &(2k)^{80k^3}(\log N)^{4k^2}N^k.
\end{split}$$
Proof of Theorems \[thm:kI\*=kI\* I=\[1,N\]\] and \[thm:kI\*=kI\* I=\[1,N\] prime\]
===================================================================================
First we prove Theorem \[thm:kI\*=kI\* I=\[1,N\]\]. It suffices to consider the case $kN^{k-1}<m$ as otherwise the statement is trivial. For $\lambda=0,1,\ldots,m-1$ denote $$J(\lambda)=\Bigl\{(x_1,\ldots,x_k)\in I^k:\quad x_1^*+\ldots+x_k^*\equiv \lambda\pmod m\Bigr\}.$$ Let $$\Omega=\{\lambda\in [1, m-1]:\quad |J(\lambda)|\ge 1\}.$$ Since $J(0)=0$, we have $$J_{2k}=\sum_{\lambda\in \Omega}|J(\lambda)|^2.$$ Consider the lattice $$\Gamma_{\lambda}=\{(u,v)\in \Z^2:\quad \lambda u\equiv v\pmod m\}$$ and the body $$D=\{(u,v)\in \R^2:\quad |u|\le N^k,\,\, |v|\le kN^{k-1}\}.$$ Denoting by $\mu_1,\mu_2$ the consecutive minimas of the body $D$ with respect to the lattice $\Gamma_{\lambda}$, by Corollary \[cor:latpoints\] it follows $$\prod_{i=1}^2\min\{\mu_i, 1\}\le \frac{15}{|\Gamma_{\lambda}\cap D|}.$$ Observe that for $(x_1,\ldots,x_k)\in J(\lambda)$ one has $$\lambda x_1\ldots x_k\equiv x_2\ldots x_{k}+\ldots+x_1\ldots x_{k-1}\pmod m,$$ implying $$(x_1\ldots x_k,\, x_2\ldots x_{k}+\ldots+x_1\ldots x_{k-1})\in \Gamma_{\lambda}\cap D.$$ Thus, for $\lambda\in \Omega$ we have $\mu_1\le 1$. We split the set $\Omega$ into two subsets: $$\Omega'=\{\lambda\in \Omega:\quad \mu_2\le 1\},\qquad
\Omega''=\{\lambda\in \Omega:\quad \mu_2> 1\}.$$ We have $$\label{eqn:Kloost Kar Range J2k S epsilon}
\begin{split}
J_{2k} = \sum_{\lambda\in \Omega'}|J(\lambda)|^2+\sum_{\lambda\in \Omega''}|J(\lambda)|^2.
\end{split}$$
[*Case 1*]{}: $\lambda\in \Omega'$, that is $\mu_2\le 1$. Let $(u_i,v_i)\in \mu_i D\cap\Gamma_{\lambda},\, i=1,2,$ be linearly independent. Then $$0\not=u_1v_2-v_1u_2\equiv u_1\lambda u_2-u_2\lambda u_1\equiv 0\pmod m,$$ whence $$\Bigl|u_1v_2-v_1u_2|\ge m.$$ Also $$\Bigl|u_1v_2-v_1u_2\Bigr|\le 2k\mu_1\mu_2 N^{2k-1}\le \frac{30kN^{2k-1}}{|\Gamma_{\lambda}\cap D|}.$$ Thus, for $\lambda\in \Omega'$, the number $|\Gamma_{\lambda}\cap
D|$ of solutions of the congruence $$\lambda u\equiv v\pmod m$$ in integers $u,v$ with $|u|\le N^k,\, |v|\le kN^{k-1}$ is bounded by $$\label{eqn:Gammalambda cap D le}
|\Gamma_{\lambda}\cap D|\le \frac{30kN^{2k-1}}{m}.$$ Note that for $\lambda\in \Omega'$ the sets $$\mathcal{W}_{\lambda}:=\{(u,v);\,\, (u,v)\in\Gamma_{\lambda}\cap D,\, \gcd(u,m)=1\}$$ are pairwise disjoint. Therefore, if we denote by $S(u,v)$ the set of $k$-tuples $(x_1,\ldots,x_k)$ of positive integers $x_1,\ldots,x_k\le N$ coprime to $m$ with $$x_1\ldots x_k=u,\quad x_2\ldots x_{k}+\ldots+x_1\ldots x_{k-1}= v,$$ we get $$\sum_{\lambda\in\Omega'}|J(\lambda)|^2=\sum_{\lambda\in\Omega'}\Bigl(\sum_{\substack{(u,v)\in\Gamma_{\lambda}\cap D\\ \gcd(u,m)=1}}\,\,\sum_{(x_1,\ldots,x_k)\in S(u,v)}1\Bigr)^2.$$ Applying the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and taking into account , we get $$\label{eqn:Square of J lambda over Omega'}
\sum_{\lambda\in\Omega'}|J(\lambda)|^2\le \frac{30kN^{2k-1}}{m}\sum_{\lambda\in\Omega'}\sum_{\substack{(u,v)\in\Gamma_{\lambda}\cap D\\ \gcd(u,m)=1}}\Bigl(\sum_{(x_1,\ldots,x_k)\in S(u,v)}1\Bigr)^2$$ From the disjointness of sets $W_{\lambda}$ it follows that the summation on the right hand side of is bounded by the number of solutions of the system of equations $$\left\{\begin{array}{llll}
x_1\ldots x_k=y_1\ldots y_k,\\
x_1\ldots x_{k-1}+\ldots+x_2\ldots x_{k}=y_2\ldots y_{k}+\ldots+y_1\ldots y_{k-1},
\end{array}
\right.$$ in positive integers $x_i,y_j\le N$ coprime to $m.$ Hence, by Lemma \[lem:Karatsuba\], it follows that $$\label{eqn:sum over Omega prima}
\sum_{\lambda\in\Omega'}|J(\lambda)|^2<30k(2k)^{80k^3}(\log N)^{4k^2}\frac{N^{3k-1}}{m}.$$
[*Case 2*]{}: $\lambda\in \Omega''$, that is $\mu_2 > 1$. Then the vectors from $\Gamma_{\lambda}\cap D$ are linearly dependent and in particular there is some $\widehat{\lambda}\in\Q$ such that $$\widehat{\lambda}x_1\ldots x_k=x_2\ldots x_{k}+\ldots+x_1\ldots x_{k-1} \quad {\rm for} \quad (x_1,\ldots,x_k)\in J(\lambda).$$ Thus, $$\begin{split}
&\sum_{\lambda\in \Omega''}|J(\lambda)|^2\le \sum_{\widehat{\lambda}\in \Q}\Bigl|\{(x_1,\ldots,x_k)\in I^k;\, \frac{1}{x_1}+\ldots+\frac{1}{x_k}=\widehat{\lambda}\Bigr|^2\\=
&\Bigl|\Bigl\{(x_1,\ldots,x_{2k})\in [1,N]^{2k}; \quad \frac{1}{x_1}+\ldots+\frac{1}{x_k}=\frac{1}{x_{k+1}}+\ldots+\frac{1}{x_{2k}}\Bigr\}\Bigr|\\
< &(2k)^{80k^3}(\log N)^{4k^2}N^k.
\end{split}$$ Inserting this and into , we obtain $$\begin{split}
J_{2k}<(2k)^{90k^3}(\log N)^{4k^2}\Bigl(\frac{N^{2k-1}}{m}+1\Bigr)N^{k}
\end{split}$$ which concludes the proof of Theorem \[thm:kI\*=kI\* I=\[1,N\]\].
The proof of Theorem \[thm:kI\*=kI\* I=\[1,N\] prime\] follows the same line with the only difference that instead of Lemma \[lem:Karatsuba\] one should apply the bound $$\begin{split}
\Bigl|\Bigl\{(x_1,\ldots,x_{2k})\in ([1,N]\cap \cP)^{2k};&\quad \frac{1}{x_1}+\ldots+\frac{1}{x_k}=\frac{1}{x_{k+1}}+\ldots+\frac{1}{x_{2k}}\Bigr\}\Bigr|\\
< &(2k)^{k}\Bigl(\frac{N}{\log N}\Bigr)^k.
\end{split}$$
Proof of Theorem \[thm:Kloost Karatsuba range\]
-----------------------------------------------
Let $$S=\sum_{x_1\in I_1}\sum_{x_2\in I_2}\alpha_1(x_1) \alpha_2(x_2)e_m(ax_1^*x_2^*).$$ Then by Hölder’s inequality $$|S|^{k_2}\le N_1^{k_2-1}\sum_{x_1\in I_1}\Bigl|\sum_{x_2\in I_2} \alpha_2(x_2)e_m(ax_1^*x_2^*)\Bigr|^{k_2}.$$ Thus, for some $\sigma(x_1)\in\C,\, |\sigma(x_1)|=1$, $$|S|^{k_2}\le N_1^{k_2-1}\sum_{y_1,\ldots,y_{k_2}\in I_2}\Bigl|\sum_{x_1\in I_1} \sigma(x_1)e_m(ax_1^*(y_1^*+\ldots+y_{k_2}^*)\Bigr|.$$ Again by Hölder’s inequality, $$|S|^{k_1k_2}\le N_1^{k_1k_2-k_1}N_2^{k_1k_2-k_2}\sum_{\lambda=0}^{p-1}J_{k_2}(\lambda;N_2)\Bigl|\sum_{x_1\in I_1} \sigma(x_1)e_m(ax_1^*\lambda\Bigr|^{k_1},$$ where $J_k(\lambda; N)$ is the number of solutions of the congruence $$x_1^*+\ldots+x_k^*\equiv \lambda\pmod m,\qquad x_i\in [1,N].$$ Then applying the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and using $$\sum_{\lambda=0}^{p-1}J_{k_2}(\lambda; N_2)^2=J_{2k_2}(N_2),\qquad \sum_{\lambda=0}^{p-1}\Bigl|\sum_{x_1\in I_1} \sigma(x_1)e_m(ax_1^*\lambda\Bigr|^{2k_1}\le
mJ_{2k_1}(N_1).$$ we get $$\label{eqn:th91011}
|S|^{2k_1k_2}\le pN_1^{2k_1k_2-2k_1}N_2^{2k_1k_2-2k_2}J_{2k_1}(N_1)J_{2k_2}(N_2).$$ Applying Theorem \[thm:kI\*=kI\* I=\[1,N\]\], we obtain $$\begin{split}
|S|^{2k_1k_2}\le &(2k_1)^{90k_1^3}(2k_2)^{90k_2^3}(\log N_1)^{4k_1^2}(\log N_2)^{4k_2^2}\times \\
\times &N_1^{2k_1k_2}N_2^{2k_1k_2}\Bigl(\frac{N_1^{k_1-1}}{m^{1/2}}+\frac{m^{1/2}}{N^{k_1}}\Bigr)
\Bigl(\frac{N_2^{k_2-1}}{m^{1/2}}+\frac{m^{1/2}}{N^{k_2}}\Bigr).
\end{split}$$ Thus, $$\begin{split}
|S|< & (2k_1)^{45k_1^2/k_2}(2k_2)^{45k_2^2/k_1}(\log m)^{2(\frac{k_1}{k_2}+\frac{k_2}{k_1})}\times \\
\times &\Bigl(\frac{N_1^{k_1-1}}{m^{1/2}}+\frac{m^{1/2}}{N^{k_1}}\Bigr)^{1/(2k_1k_2)}
\Bigl(\frac{N_2^{k_2-1}}{m^{1/2}}+\frac{m^{1/2}}{N^{k_2}}\Bigr)^{1/(2k_1k_2)}N_1N_2,
\end{split}$$ which finishes the proof of Theorem \[thm:Kloost Karatsuba range\].
Proof of Theorem \[thm:BrunTitch\]
==================================
Let $\varepsilon$ be a positive constant very small in terms of $\delta=1-\theta$ (say, $\varepsilon=\delta^4$). Denote $$\begin{split}
&\cA=\{n\le x; \, n\equiv a\pmod q\},\\
&\cA_d=\{n\in\cA; \, n\equiv 0\pmod d\},\\
&S(\cA,z)=|\{n\in \cA;\, (n,p)=1\,\, {\rm for}\,\, p<z, (p,q)=1\}|,\\
& r_d=|\cA_d|-\frac{x}{qd}.
\end{split}$$ We take $z=D^{1/2}$, where $D$ is the level of distribution. We shall define $D$ to satisfy $$D\sim \Bigl(\frac{x}{q}\Bigr)^{1+c\delta^2}\sim x^{\delta+c\delta^3}\sim q^{\delta+\delta^2+O(\delta^3)},$$ where $c$ is a suitable absolute positive constant ($c=0.01$ will do).
Take integer $k$ such that $$\frac{1}{2k-1}\le\frac{\delta}{2}<\frac{1}{2k-3}.$$ Having in mind [@FrIw1 Theorem 12.21], we consider the factorization $D=MN$ in the form $$N=q^{1/(2k-1)},\quad M=\frac{D}{N}.$$ Following the proof of [@FrIw1 Theorem 13.1] we find that $$S(\cA,z)\le\frac{(2+\varepsilon)x}{\phi(q)\log D}+R(M,N).$$ Here the remainder $R(M,N)$ is estimated by $$R(M,N)\ll \sum_{\substack{m\le M, n\le N\\ \gcd(mn,q)=1}}\alpha_m\beta_nr_{mn},$$ the implied constant may depend on $\varepsilon$. Our aim is to prove the bound $R(M,N)\ll x^{1-\varepsilon}q^{-1}$. For this we may assume that $\alpha_m,\beta_n$ are supported on dyadic intervals $$0.5M_1<m\le M_1,\quad 0.5N_1<n\le N_1$$ for some $1\le M_1\le M$ and $1\le N_1\le N$ with $M_1N_1q>x^{1-\varepsilon}.$ Then according to [@FrIw1 p.262] we have the bound $$R(M,N)\ll \frac{x}{qM_1N_1}\sum_{0<|h|\le H}\sum_{m\sim M_1}\Bigl|\sum_{n\sim N_1}\gamma(h;n)e_q(ahm^*n^*)\Bigr|+\frac{x^{1-\varepsilon}}{q},$$ where $$H=qM_1N_1x^{3\varepsilon-1}\le qDx^{3\varepsilon-1}\ll x^{c\delta^3+3\varepsilon}.$$ In particular, $\gcd(h,q)<q^{O(\delta^3)}$. Thus, for some $\gamma(n)\in \C$ with $|\gamma(n)|\le 1$ we have $$R(M,N)\ll x^{3\varepsilon}\sum_{m\le M}\Bigl|\sum_{n\le N}\gamma(n)e_{q_1}(a_1m^*n^*)\Bigr|+\frac{x^{1-\varepsilon}}{q},$$ where, say, $q^{1-\delta^2}\le q_1\le q$ and $\gcd(a_1,q_1)=1$. Then our Theorem \[thm:Kloost Karatsuba range\] applied with $k_1=k_2=k$ implies that $$R(M,N)\ll MN^{1-c_0/k^2}+\frac{x^{1-\varepsilon}}{q}<D^{1-c_0\delta^2}+\frac{x^{1-\varepsilon}}{q},$$ where $c_0>0$ is an absolute constant. Therefore, from the choice $D\sim x^{\delta+c\delta^2}$ with $0<c<0.5c_0$, we obtain $$S(\cA,z)<\frac{(2-c'\delta^2)x}{\phi(q)\log(x/q)}$$ for some absolute constant $c'>0$. The result follows.
Proof of Theorem \[thm:linear sqrt log m\]
==========================================
The proof of Theorem \[thm:linear sqrt log m\] is based on Bourgain’s multilinear exponential sum bounds for general moduli [@B2], see Lemma \[lem:B2\] above. We will also need a version of Theorem \[thm:Kloost Karatsuba range\] on bilinear Kloosterman sum estimates with the variables of summation restricted to prime and almost prime numbers.
Double Kloosterman sums with primes and almost primes
-----------------------------------------------------
As a consequence of Theorem \[thm:kI\*=kI\* I=\[1,N\] prime\] we have the following bilinear Kloosterman sum estimate.
\[cor:doubleKloostWithPrimes\] Let $N_1,N_2, k_1,k_2$ be positive integers, $\gcd(a,m)=1$. Then for any coefficients $\alpha(p),\beta(q)\in \C$ with $|\alpha(p)|, |\beta(q)|\le 1$, we have $$\begin{split}
\Bigl|\sum_{p\le N_1}\,\, &\sum_{q\le N_2}\alpha(p) \beta(q)e_m(ap^*q^*)\Bigr|\\
< & (2k_1)^{\frac{1}{k_2}}(2k_2)^{\frac{1}{k_1}}\Bigl(\frac{N_1^{k_1-1}}{m^{1/2}}+\frac{m^{1/2}}{N_1^{k_1}}\Bigr)^{1/(2k_1k_2)}
\Bigl(\frac{N_2^{k_2-1}}{m^{1/2}}+\frac{m^{1/2}}{N_2^{k_2}}\Bigr)^{1/(2k_1k_2)}N_1N_2,
\end{split}$$ where the variables $p$ and $q$ of the summations are restricted to prime numbers.
Indeed, denoting the quantity on the left hand side by $|S|$ and following the proof of Theorem \[thm:Kloost Karatsuba range\] we arrive at the bound (see ) $$|S|^{2k_1k_2}\le
mN_1^{2k_1k_2-2k_1}N_2^{2k_1k_2-2k_2}J_{2k_1}(N_1)J_{2k_2}(N_2),$$ where in our case $J_{2k}(N)$ denotes the number of solutions of the congruence $$p_1^*+\ldots+p_k^*\equiv p_{k+1}^*+\ldots+p_{2k}^*\pmod m$$ in prime numbers $p_1,\ldots,p_{2k}\le N$. The statement then follows by the bounds for $J_{2k}(N)$ given in Theorem \[thm:kI\*=kI\* I=\[1,N\] prime\].
\[lem:kI\*=kI\* I=\[1,N\] almost prime equality\] Let $K,L$ be large positive integers, $2L<K$. Then uniformly over $k$ the number $T_{2k}(K,L)$ of solutions of the diophantine equation $$\frac{1}{p_1q_1}+\ldots+\frac{1}{p_kq_k}=\frac{1}{p_{k+1}q_{k+1}}+\ldots+\frac{1}{p_{2k}q_{2k}}$$ in prime numbers $p_i,q_i$ satisfying $0.5K<p_i<K$ and $q_i<L$ is bounded by $$T_{2k}(K,L)<k^{4k}\Bigl(\frac{K}{\log K}\Bigr)^k\Bigl(\frac{L}{\log L}\Bigr)^{k}.$$
The proof is straightforward. For any given $1\le i_0\le 2k$ we have $$\frac{p_1\ldots p_{2k}q_1\ldots q_{2k}}{p_{i_0}q_{i_0}}\equiv 0\pmod {p_{i_0}q_{i_0}}$$ Since $p_i\not=q_j$, it follows that $p_{i_0}$ appears in the sequence $p_1,\ldots,p_{2k}$ at least two times. Thus, the sequence $p_1,\ldots,p_{2k}$ contains at most $k$ different prime numbers. Correspondingly, the sequence $q_1,\ldots,q_{2k}$ contains at most $k$ different prime numbers. Therefore, there are at most $$k^{2k}\Bigl(\frac{0.9K}{\log K}\Bigr)^k k^{2k}\Bigl(\frac{1.1L}{\log L}\Bigr)^k<k^{4k}\Bigl(\frac{K}{\log K}\Bigr)^k\Bigl(\frac{L}{\log L}\Bigr)^{k}$$ possibilities for $(p_1,\ldots,p_{2k}, q_1,\ldots, q_{2k})$. The result follows.
Now following the same line as the proof of Theorems \[thm:kI\*=kI\* I=\[1,N\]\] and \[thm:kI\*=kI\* I=\[1,N\] prime\], with the only difference that in the course of the proof we substitute Lemma \[lem:Karatsuba\] by Lemma \[lem:kI\*=kI\* I=\[1,N\] almost prime equality\], we get the following statement.
\[lem:kI\*=kI\* I=\[1,N\] almost prime congruence\] Let $K,L$ be large positive integers, $2L<K$. Then uniformly over $k$ the number $J_{2k}(K,L)$ of solutions of the diophantine equation $$\frac{1}{p_1q_1}+\ldots+\frac{1}{p_kq_k}\equiv \frac{1}{p_{k+1}q_{k+1}}+\ldots+\frac{1}{p_{2k}q_{2k}}\pmod {m}$$ in prime numbers $p_i,q_i$ satisfying $0.5K<p_i<K$ and $q_i<L$ is bounded by $$J_{2k}(K,L)<k^{4k}\Bigl(\frac{(KL)^{2k-1}}{m}+1\Bigr)(KL)^{k}.$$
From Lemma \[lem:kI\*=kI\* I=\[1,N\] almost prime congruence\] we get the following corollary.
\[cor:doubleKloostWithAlmostPrimes\] Let $N,K,L, k_1,k_2$ be positive integers, $2L<K$. Then for any coefficients $\alpha(p),\beta(q;r)\in \C$ with $|\alpha(p)|, |\beta(q;r)|\le 1$, we have $$\begin{split}
&\max_{\gcd(a,m)=1}\Bigl|\sum_{p\le N}\,\,\sum_{0.5K<q\le K}\,\sum_{r\le L}\alpha(p) \beta(q;r)e_m(ap^*q^*r^*)\Bigr|\\
&< k_1^{\frac{2}{k_2}}k_2^{\frac{2}{k_1}}\Bigl(\frac{N^{k_1-1}}{m^{1/2}}+\frac{m^{1/2}}{N^{k_1}}\Bigr)^{1/(2k_1k_2)}
\Bigl(\frac{(KL)^{k_2-1}}{m^{1/2}}+\frac{m^{1/2}}{(KL)^{k_2}}\Bigr)^{1/(2k_1k_2)}NKL,
\end{split}$$ where the variables $p, q$ and $r$ of the summations are restricted to prime numbers.
Proof of Theorem \[thm:linear sqrt log m\]
------------------------------------------
Denote $\varepsilon:=\log N/\log m>c$. As we have mentioned before, we can assume that $\varepsilon<4/7$.
In what follows, $r$ is a large absolute integer constant. More explicitly, we define $r$ to be the choice of $k$ in Lemma \[lem:B2\] with, say, $\gamma=1/10$. Denote $$\cG=\{x<N:\quad p_1\ge N^{\alpha},\, p_r\ge N^{\beta},\, p_1p_2\ldots p_r<N^{1-\beta}\},$$ where $p_1\ge p_2\ge\ldots\ge p_r$ are the largest prime factors of $x$ and $$0.1>\alpha> \beta>\frac{1}{\log N}$$ are parameters to specify. Note that the number of positive integers not exceeding $N$ and consisting on products of at most $r-1$ prime numbers is estimated by $$\begin{aligned}
\sum_{k=1}^{r-1}\sum_{\substack{p_1\ldots p_k\le N\\ p_1\ge\ldots\ge p_k}} 1\ll
\frac{N}{\log N}+\sum_{k=2}^{r-1}\sum_{p_2\ldots p_k\le N^{(k-1)/k}}\frac{N}{p_2\ldots p_k\log (N/(p_2\ldots p_k))}\\
\ll \frac{N}{\log N}+\sum_{k=2}^{r-1}\sum_{p_2\le N}\ldots\sum_{p_k\le N}\frac{N}{p_2\ldots p_k\log N}\\
\ll \frac{N(\log\log N)^{r-1}}{\log N}.\end{aligned}$$ Here and below the implied constants may depend only on $r$. Hence, we have $$\begin{split}
N-|\cG| \le \frac{cN(\log\log N)^{r-1}}{\log N}+\sum_{\substack{x<N\\ p_1<N^{\alpha}}}1+\sum_{\substack{x<N\\ p_r<N^{\beta}}}1+
\sum_{\substack{x<N\\ p_1p_2\ldots p_{r}>N^{1-\beta}}}1,
\end{split}$$ for some constant $c=c(r)>0$. Next, we have $$\begin{split}
\sum_{\substack{x<N\\ p_1p_2\ldots p_{r}>N^{1-\beta}}}1&\le \sum_{\substack{y<N^{\beta}\\ p_1p_2\ldots p_{r}<N/y}}1\\&\ll
\sum_{\substack{y<N^{\beta}}}\, \sum_{p_2\ldots p_r<(N/y)^{(r-1)/r}}\frac{N}{y p_2\ldots p_r\log (N/(y p_2\ldots p_r))}\\
&\ll \sum_{y<N^{\beta}}\frac{N(\log\log N)^{r-1}}{y\log N}\ll \beta N (\log\log N)^{r-1}.
\end{split}$$ Let $\Psi(x,y)$, as usual, denote the number of positive integers $\le x$ having no prime divisors $>y$. Thus, we have $$\begin{split}
N-|\cG| \le c_1\beta N (\log\log N)^{r-1}+\Psi(N,N^{\alpha}) +\sum_{\substack{x<N\\ p_r<N^{\beta}}}1,
\end{split}$$ for some constant $c_1=c_1(r)>0$.
Letting $0.1>\beta_1>\beta$ be another parameter, we similarly observe that $$\begin{split}
\sum_{\substack{x<N\\ p_1\ldots p_{r-1}>N^{1-\beta_1}}}1 &\le \sum_{y<N^{\beta_1}}\sum_{p_1\ldots p_{r-1}\le N/y}1\\
&\ll\sum_{y<N^{\beta_1}}\frac{N(\log\log N)^{r-2}}{y\log N}
\ll \beta_1 N (\log\log N)^{r-2}.
\end{split}$$ Hence, $$\begin{split}
N-|\cG| \le c_1\beta N (\log\log N)^{r-1}+c_2\beta_1 N (\log\log N)^{r-2}\\ +\Psi(N,N^{\alpha})
+\sum_{\substack{x<N\\ p_r<N^{\beta}\\ p_1\ldots p_{r-1}\le N^{1-\beta_1}}}1,
\end{split}$$ Observing that $$\sum_{\substack{x<N\\ p_r<N^{\beta}\\ p_1\ldots p_{r-1}\le N^{1-\beta_1}}}1\le
\sum_{p_1\ldots p_{r-1}\le N^{1-\beta_1}}\Psi\Bigl(\frac{N}{p_1\ldots p_{r-1}}, N^{\beta}\Bigr),$$ we get $$\begin{split}
N-|\cG| \le c_1\beta N (\log\log N)^{r-1}+c_2\beta_1 N (\log\log N)^{r-2}+\\ \Psi(N,N^{\alpha})
+\sum_{p_1\ldots p_{r-1}\le N^{1-\beta_1}} \Psi\Bigl(\frac{N}{p_1\ldots p_{r-1}}, N^{\beta}\Bigr).
\end{split}$$ By the classical result of de Bruijn [@Bruin] if $y>(\log x)^{1+\delta}$, where $\delta>0$ is a fixed constant, then $$\Psi(x,y)\le xu^{-u(1+o(1))} \quad {\rm as}\quad u=\frac{\log x}{\log y}\to\infty.$$ We now take $$\alpha=\frac{1}{\log\log m},\qquad \beta= \frac{\log\log m}{(\log m)^{1/2}},\qquad \beta_1=\beta \log\log m=\frac{(\log\log m)^{2}}{(\log m)^{1/2}}$$ and then have $$\begin{split}
N-|\cG| & <\alpha^{\frac{1}{2\alpha}}N+\sum_{p_1\ldots p_{r-1}<N^{1-\beta_1}}\frac{N}{p_1\ldots p_{r-1}}\Bigl(\frac{\beta}{\beta_1}\Bigr)^{\frac{\beta_1}{2\beta}}+
c\beta N(\log\log m)^{r-1}\\
&<\Bigl(\alpha^{\frac{1}{2\alpha}}+(\log\log N)^{r-1}\Bigl(\frac{\beta}{\beta_1}\Bigr)^{\frac{\beta_1}{2\beta}}+c_3\beta (\log\log m)^{r-1}\Bigr)N\\
&<c_4\beta(\log\log m)^{r-1} N.
\end{split}$$ Therefore $$\label{eqn:sum short x<N}
\Bigl|\sum_{x<N}e_m(ax^*)\Bigr|\le c_4\beta(\log\log m)^{r-1} N+\Bigl|\sum_{x\in \cG}e_m(ax^*)\Bigr|.$$ The sum $\sum\limits_{x\in \cG}e_m(ax^*)$ may be bounded by $$\label{eqn:cuadruple sum}
{\sum_{p_1}}{\sum_{p_2}}\ldots{\sum_{p_r}}\Bigl|\sum_{y}e_m(ap_1^*p_2^*\ldots p_r^*y^*)\Bigr|,$$ where the summations are taken over primes $p_1, p_2, \ldots, p_r$ and integers $y$ such that $$\label{eqn:primes p1p2p3}
p_1\ge p_2\ge \ldots \ge p_r;\quad p_1\ge N^{\alpha}; \quad p_r\ge N^{\beta};\quad p_1p_2\ldots p_r\le N^{1-\beta}$$ and $$y<\frac{N}{p_1p_2\ldots p_r};\qquad P(y)\le p_r.$$ Note that if $t$ and $T$ are such that $$\label{eqn:t and T}
\Bigl(1-\frac{c_0}{\log m}\Bigr)p_r<t< p_r,\qquad \Bigl(1-\frac{c_0}{\log m}\Bigr)\frac{N}{p_1p_2\ldots p_r}<T<\frac{N}{p_1p_2\ldots p_r},$$ where $c_0>0$ is any constant, then we can substitute the condition on $y$ with $$\label{eqn:yyy}
P(y)\le t; \qquad y<T$$ by changing the sum with an additional term of size at most $$\frac{N(\log\log m)^{O(1)}}{\log m}.$$ Now we split the range of summation of primes $p_1,p_2, \ldots,
p_r$ into subintervals of the form $[L, L+L(\log m)^{-1}]$ and choosing suitable $t$ and $T$ we obtain that for some numbers $M_1,M_2,\ldots, M_r$ with $$\label{eqn:M1M2M3 Kloost restrictions}
M_1>M_2>\ldots >M_r,\quad M_1\ge \frac{N^{\alpha}}{2}, \quad M_r\ge \frac{N^{\beta}}{2},\quad M_1M_2\ldots M_r<N^{1-\beta}$$ one has $$\label{eqn:sum x in G Kloost}
\begin{split}
\Bigl|\sum_{x\in \cG}e_m(ax^*)\Bigr|&<\frac{N(\log\log m)^{O(1)}}{\log m}\\&+
(\log m)^{3r}{\sum_{p_1\in I_1}}{\sum_{p_2\in I_2}}\ldots {\sum_{p_r\in I_r}}\Bigl|\sum_{\substack{y\le M\\ P(y)\le M_r}}e_m(ap_1^*p_2^*\ldots p_r^*y^*)\Bigr|,
\end{split}$$ where $$I_j=\Bigl[M_j, M_j+\frac{M_j}{\log m}\Bigr], \qquad M=\frac{N}{M_1M_2\ldots M_r}\ge N^{\beta}.$$ Denote $$W=\sum_{p_1\in I_1}\sum_{p_2\in I_2}\ldots \sum_{p_r\in I_r}\Bigl|\sum_{\substack{y\le M\\ P(y)\le M_r}}e_m(ap_1^*p_2^*\ldots p_r^*y^*)\Bigr|.$$ Applying the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we get $$W^2\le M_1M_2\ldots M_r\sum_{y\le M}\sum_{z\le M}\Bigl|\sum_{p_1\in I_1}\sum_{p_2\in I_2}\ldots \sum_{p_r\in I_r}e_m\Bigl(ap_1^*p_2^*\ldots p_r^*(y^*-z^*)\Bigr)\Bigr|.$$ Taking into account the contribution from the pairs $y$ and $z$ with, say, $$\gcd(y-z,m)>e^{10\log m/\log\log m}$$ and then fixing the pairs $y$ and $z$ with $ \gcd(y-z,m)\le
e^{10\log m/\log\log m}$, we get the bound $$\label{eqn:W^2 Kloost}
W^2\le \frac{N^2}{M}+\frac{N^2}{e^{\log m/\log\log m}}+NM|S|\le 2N^{2-\beta}+\frac{N^2}{M_1M_2\ldots M_r}|S|,$$ where $$|S|=\Bigl|\sum_{p_1\in I_1}\sum_{p_2\in I_2}\ldots \sum_{p_r\in I_r}e_{m_1}(bp_1^*p_2^*\ldots p_r^*)\Bigr|.$$ Here $b$ and $m_1$ are some positive integers satisfying $$\gcd(b,m_1)=1,\quad m_1\ge me^{-10\log m/\log\log m}.$$
We consider two cases, depending on whether $M_r> N^{\alpha^3}$ or $M_r\le N^{\alpha^3}$.
[*Case 1*]{}. Let $M_r > N^{\alpha^3}$. Hence $M_j>N^{\alpha^3}$ for all $j=1,2,\ldots,r.$ The idea is to use Theorem \[thm:kI\*=kI\* I=\[1,N\] prime\] and amplify each of these factors to size $m^{1/3+o(1)}$ say and then apply Lemma \[lem:B2\].
Let $k_1,\ldots,k_r$ be positive integers defined from $$M_i^{2k_i-1}<m_1\le M_i^{2k_i+1}.$$ Since $M_i>N^{\alpha^3}>m^{c\alpha^3}$, it follows that $$k_i<\frac{1}{c\alpha^3}=\frac{(\log\log m)^3}{c}.$$
Consequently applying Hölder’s inequality, we get the bound $$|S|^{2^rk_1k_2\ldots k_{r}}\le \Bigl(\prod_{i=1}^{r}M_i^{2^rk_1\ldots k_r-2k_i}\Bigr)\sum_{\substack{p_{11},\ldots, p_{1k_1}\in I_1\cap\cP\\ q_{11},\ldots, q_{1k_1}\in I_1\cap\cP}}\ldots \sum_{\substack{p_{r1},\ldots, p_{r k_r}\in I_r\cap\cP\\ q_{r1},\ldots,q_{rk_r}\in I_r\cap\cP}}e^{2\pi i b\{...\}/m_1},$$ where $\{...\}$ indicates the expression $$(p_{11}^*+\ldots+p_{1k_1}^*-q_{11}^*-\ldots-q_{1k_1}^*)\cdots (p_{r1}^*+\ldots+p_{rk_r}^*-q_{r1}^*-\ldots-q_{rk_r}^*)$$ Next, we can fix the variables $q_{ij}$ and then get that for some integers $\mu_1,\ldots,\mu_r$ there is the bound $$\label{eqn:Case 1 S via S1}
\frac{|S|}{ M_1M_2\ldots M_r}\le\Bigl(\frac{|S_1|}{M_1^{k_1}M_2^{k_2}\ldots M_r^{k_r}}\Bigr)^{1/(2^rk_1 k_2 \ldots k_r)},$$ where $$S_1=\sum_{p_{11},\ldots, p_{1k_1}\in I_1\cap\cP}\ldots \sum_{p_{r1},\ldots, p_{r k_r}\in I_r\cap\cP}e^{2\pi i b(p_{11}^*+\ldots+p_{1k_1}^*-\mu_1)\cdots (p_{r1}^*+\ldots+p_{rk_r}^*-\mu_r)/m_1}.$$ Let $A_1,\ldots, A_r$ be subsets of $\Z_{m_1}$ defined by $$\begin{aligned}
A_1=\{p_{11}^*+\ldots+p_{1k_1}^*-\mu_1; \quad (p_{11},\ldots,p_{1k_1})\in (I_1\cap\cP)^{k_1}\},\\
\centerline{\ldots}\\
A_r=\{p_{r1}^*+\ldots+p_{rk_r}^*-\mu_r; \quad (p_{r1},\ldots,p_{rk_r})\in (I_r\cap\cP)^{k_r}\},\end{aligned}$$ where $p_{ij}^*$ are calculated modulo $m_1$. Then we have $$S_1=\sum_{\lambda_1\in A_1}\ldots \sum_{\lambda_r\in A_r} I_1(\lambda_1)\ldots I_r(\lambda_r) e^{2\pi i b \lambda_1\ldots \lambda_r/m_1},$$ where $I_j(\lambda)$ is the number of solutions of the congruence $$p_{j1}^*+\ldots+p_{jk_j}^*-\mu_j\equiv\lambda\pmod {m_1}; \qquad (p_{j1},\ldots,p_{jk_j})\in (I_j\cap\cP)^{k_j}.$$ We apply Cauchy-Schwarz inequality to the sum over $\lambda_1,\ldots,\lambda_{r-1}$ and get $$|S_1|^{2}\le J_{2k_1}(M_1)\ldots J_{2k_r}(M_r)\sum_{\lambda_1\in A_1}\ldots \sum_{\lambda_{r-1}\in A_{r-1}}\Bigl|\sum_{\lambda_r\in A_r} I_r(\lambda_r) e^{2\pi i b \lambda_1\ldots \lambda_{r-1} \lambda_r/m_1}\Bigr|^2,$$ where $$J_{2k_j}(M_j)=\sum_{\lambda\in A_j} (I_j(\lambda))^2.$$ Changing the order of summation, we get $$\begin{aligned}
\begin{split}
|S_1|^{2}\le & J_{2k_1}(M_1)\ldots J_{2k_{r-1}}(M_{r-1})\times \\ & \sum_{\lambda_r,\lambda_r'\in A_r} I_r(\lambda_r)I_r(\lambda_r')\Bigl|\sum_{\lambda_1\in A_1}\ldots \sum_{\lambda_{r-1}\in A_{r-1}} e^{2\pi i b\lambda_1\ldots \lambda_{r-1} (\lambda_r-\lambda_r')/m_1}\Bigr|.
\end{split}\end{aligned}$$ We apply the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality to the sum over $\lambda_r,\lambda_r'$ and get $$\begin{aligned}
\begin{split}
|S_1|^{4}\le &(J_{2k_1}(M_1)\ldots J_{2k_{r}}(M_{r}))^2\times \\ & \sum_{\lambda_r,\lambda_r'\in A_r} \Bigl|\sum_{\lambda_1\in A_1}\ldots \sum_{\lambda_{r-1}\in A_{r-1}} e^{2\pi i b \lambda_1\ldots \lambda_{r-1} (\lambda_r-\lambda_r')/m_1}\Bigr|^2.
\end{split}\end{aligned}$$ We can fix $\lambda_r'\in A_r$ such that $$\begin{aligned}
\begin{split}
|S_1|^{4}\le & (J_{2k_1}(M_1)\ldots J_{2k_{r}}(M_{r}))^2 |A_r|\times \\ & \sum_{\lambda_r\in A_r'} \Bigl|\sum_{\lambda_1\in A_1}\ldots
\sum_{\lambda_{r-1}\in A_{r-1}} e^{2\pi i b \lambda_1\ldots \lambda_{r-1} \lambda_r/m_1}\Bigr|^2,
\end{split}\end{aligned}$$ where $A_r'=A_r-\{\lambda_r'\}$. Using the trivial bound $$\begin{aligned}
\begin{split}
\Bigl|\sum_{\lambda_1\in A_1}&\ldots
\sum_{\lambda_{r-1}\in A_{r-1}} e^{2\pi i b \lambda_1\ldots \lambda_{r-1} \lambda_r/m_1}\Bigr|^2 \\ & \le |A_1|\ldots|A_{r-1}| \Bigl|\sum_{\lambda_1\in A_1}\ldots
\sum_{\lambda_{r-1}\in A_{r-1}} e^{2\pi i b \lambda_1\ldots \lambda_{r-1} \lambda_r/m_1}\Bigr|,
\end{split}\end{aligned}$$ we get $$\begin{aligned}
\begin{split}
|S_1|^{4}\le (J_{2k_1}(M_1)& \ldots J_{2k_{r}}(M_{r}))^2 |A_1|\ldots |A_r|\times \\ & \sum_{\lambda_r\in A_r'} \Bigl|\sum_{\lambda_1\in A_1}\ldots
\sum_{\lambda_{r-1}\in A_{r-1}} e^{2\pi i b \lambda_1\ldots \lambda_{r-1} \lambda_r/m_1}\Bigr|,
\end{split}\end{aligned}$$ From the definition of $A_i$ we have $|A_i|\le M_i^{k_i}$ . From the choice of $k_i$ and Theorem \[thm:kI\*=kI\* I=\[1,N\] prime\] we also have $$J_{2k_i}(M_i)<2(2k_i)^{k_i}M_i^{k_i}.$$ Thus, $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eqn:S1^4<}
|S_1|^{4}\le \Bigl(\prod_{i=1}^r(4k_i)^{k_i}M_i^{3k_i}\Bigr)\times \sum_{\lambda_r\in A_r'} \Bigl|\sum_{\lambda_1\in A_1}\ldots
\sum_{\lambda_{r-1}\in A_{r-1}} e^{2\pi i b \lambda_1\ldots \lambda_{r-1} \lambda_r)/m_1}\Bigr|,\end{aligned}$$
Let $\gamma=1/10$ and define $\varepsilon=\varepsilon(\gamma)>0$ to be the absolute constant from Lemma \[lem:B2\]. We shall verify that the sets $A_1,\ldots,A_r$ satisfy the condition of Lemma \[lem:B2\] with $q=m_1$ (note that if $A_r$ satisfies the condition of Lemma \[lem:B2\] then also does $A_r'$). From the definition of $A_i$ and the connection between the cardinality of a set and the corresponding additive energies, we have $$\label{eqn:Ai greater than Mi to the ki}
|A_i|\ge \frac{(M_i/(2\log M_i))^{2k_i}}{J_{2k_i}(M_i)}\ge \frac{M_i^{k_i}}{2(2k_i)^{k_i}(2\log M_i)^{2k_i}}.$$ From the choice of $k_i$ it then follows that $$|A_i|\ge \frac{m_1^{1/3}}{2(2k_i)^{k_i}(2\log M_i)^{2k_i}}=m_1^{1/3+o(1)}.$$
Thus, the first condition $|A_i|>m_1^{1/10}$ is satisfied.
Next, let $q_1|m_1, q_1>m_1^{\varepsilon}$ and let $\xi\in\Z_{q_1}$. Let $T_i$ be the number of solutions of the congruence $$x\equiv \xi\pmod {q_1};\qquad x\in A_i.$$ It follows that $T_i$ is bounded by the number of solutions of the congruence $$p_{1}^*+\ldots+p_{k_i}^*\equiv \xi+\mu_1 \pmod {q_1}; \quad (p_{1},\ldots,p_{k_i})\in (I_i\cap\cP)^{k_i}.$$ Consider two possibilities here. If $M_i>q_1^{1/8}$ say, then we fix $p_2,\ldots,p_{k_i}$ and we have at most $1+M_iq_1^{-1}$ possibilities for $p_1$. Thus, using , we get $$\Bigl(1+\frac{M_i}{q_1}\Bigr)M_i^{k_i-1}<\frac{M_i^{k_i}}{q_1^{1/9}}<q_1^{-1/10}|A_i|.$$ Therefore, in this case the condition of Lemma \[lem:B2\] is satisfied.
Let now $M_i<q_1^{1/8}$. Define $k_i'$ from the condition $$M_i^{4k_i'+1}<q_1< M_i^{4k_i'+5}.$$ We then have $2k_i'<k_i$. Thus, $$T_i\le M_i^{k_i-2k_i'}J_{2k_i'}(M_i),$$ where $J_{2k_i'}(M_i)$, as before, denotes the number of solutions of the congruence $$p_{1}^*+\ldots+p_{k_i'}^*\equiv p_{k_i'+1}^*+\ldots+p_{2k_i'}^* \pmod {q_1}; \quad (p_{1},\ldots,p_{2k_i'})\in (I_i\cap\cP)^{2k_i'}.$$ From the choice of $k_i$ and Theorem \[thm:kI\*=kI\* I=\[1,N\] prime\] we get that $$J_{2k_i'}(M_i)<2(2k_i)^{k_i}M_i^{k_i'}.$$ Therefore, using $$T_i\le 2(2k_i)^{k_i} M_i^{k_i-k_i'}\le 2(2k_i)^{k_i} M_i^{k_i}q^{-1/9}<q_1^{-1/10}|A_i|.$$
Thus, the condition of Lemma \[lem:B2\] is satisfied and hence we have $$\sum_{\lambda_r\in A_r'} \Bigl|\sum_{\lambda_1\in A_1}\ldots
\sum_{\lambda_{r-1}\in A_{r-1}} e^{2\pi i b \lambda_1\ldots \lambda_{r-1} \lambda_r/m_1}\Bigr|<m^{-\tau}|A_1|\ldots |A_r|$$ for some absolute constant $\tau>0$ (see the discussion followed to Lemma \[lem:B2\]). Inserting this into and using estimates $k_i\ll (\log\log\log m)^{3}$ and $|A_i|\le M_i^{k_i},$ we get $$|S_1|^4<m^{-\tau/5} M_1^{k_1}M_2^{k_2}\ldots M_r^{k_r}.$$ Thus, from it follows that $$\frac{|S|}{M_1M_2\ldots M_r}<m^{-c_1(\log\log\log m)^{-3r}}$$ and from we get $$W<2 N^{1-0.5\beta}.$$ Inserting this into and using , we conclude the proof.
[*Case 2*]{}. Let now $M_r < N^{\alpha^3}$. In this case we fix all the factors except $p_1,p_2,p_r$. We apply Corollary \[cor:doubleKloostWithPrimes\] or Corollary \[cor:doubleKloostWithAlmostPrimes\]. We either choose for the first factor $p_1$ and the second factor $p_2$ or for the first factor $p_1p_r$ and the second factor $p_2$. Because $M_1 >
N^{\alpha}$ and $M_r <N^{\alpha^3}$ we will get in one of the cases the required saving. Let us give some details of this argument.
Define $k_1,k_2\in \Z_{+}$ such that $$M_1^{k_1-1}<m_1^{1/2}\le M_1^{k_1},\qquad M_2^{k_2-1}<m_1^{1/2}\le M_2^{k_2}.$$ From the definition of $\alpha$ and $\beta$ we have $$k_1\le \frac{1}{c}\log\log m;\qquad k_2\le
\frac{1}{c\beta}\ll \frac{(\log m)^{1/2}}{\log\log m}.$$ Let $$\delta=\frac{k_1\log M_r}{3\log M_1}.$$ Note that $\delta\le \frac{1}{c}(\log\log m)^{-1}.$ We further consider three subcases:
[*Case 2.1.*]{} Let $M_1^{k_1-1+\delta}<m_1^{1/2}\le
M_1^{k_1-\delta}$. Then we apply Corollary \[cor:doubleKloostWithPrimes\] and get $$\begin{aligned}
\begin{split}
\frac{|S|}{M_1M_2\ldots M_r}& < (\log m)^{1/2}\Bigl(\frac{M_1^{k_1-1}}{m_1^{1/2}}+\frac{m_1^{1/2}}{M_1^{k_1}}\Bigr)^{1/(2k_1k_2)}\\ & < 2(\log m)^{1/2}M_1^{-\delta/(2k_1k_2)}
=2(\log m)^{1/2}M_r^{-1/(6k_2)}.
\end{split}\end{aligned}$$ Using the upper bound for $k_2$ and the lower bound $M_r\ge
N^{\beta}$ it follows that $$\frac{|S|}{M_1M_2\ldots M_r}<2(\log m)^{1/2} e^{-0.01c^2\beta^2\log m}.$$
[*Case 2.2.*]{} Let $M_1^{k_1-\delta}<m_1^{1/2}\le M_1^{k_1}$. We apply Corollary \[cor:doubleKloostWithAlmostPrimes\] in the form $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{|S|}{M_1M_2\ldots M_r}<(\log m)\Bigl(\frac{(M_1M_r)^{k_1-1}}{m_1^{1/2}}+\frac{m_1^{1/2}}{(M_1M_r)^{k_1}}\Bigr)^{1/(2k_1k_2)}\\
<(\log m)\Bigl(\frac{M_r^{k_1-1}}{M_1^{1-\delta}}+\frac{1}{M_r^{k_1}}\Bigr)^{1/(2k_1k_2)}.\end{aligned}$$
[*Case 2.3.*]{} Let now $M_1^{k_1-1}<m_1^{1/2}\le
M_1^{k_1-1+\delta}$. Then $k_1\ge 2$ and we apply Corollary \[cor:doubleKloostWithAlmostPrimes\] with $k_1$ replaced by $k_1-1$ in the form $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{|S|}{M_1M_2\ldots M_r}<(\log m)^{1/2}\Bigl(\frac{(M_1M_r)^{k_1-2}}{m_1^{1/2}}+\frac{m_1^{1/2}}{(M_1M_r)^{k_1-1}}\Bigr)^{1/(2k_1k_2)}\\
<(\log m)^{1/2}\Bigl(\frac{M_r^{k_1-2}}{M_1}+\frac{M_1^{\delta}}{M_r^{k_1-1}}\Bigr)^{1/(2k_1k_2)}.\end{aligned}$$
In all three subcases we get the bound $$\frac{|S|}{M_1M_2\ldots M_r}<2(\log m)e^{-c'\beta^2\log m}$$ for some constant $c'>0$. Thus, we eventually arrive at the bound $$W<N e^{-c''\beta^2\log m}\log m$$ for some constant $c'>0$. Inserting this into and using , we conclude that $$\Bigl|\sum_{x<N}e_m(ax^*)\Bigr|\ll \beta(\log\log m)^{r-1} N+ N e^{-c'''\beta^2\log m}\log m\ll \frac{(\log\log m)^{r}}{(\log m)^{1/2}}N.$$
[100]{}
U. Betke, M. Henk and J. M. Wills, ‘Successive-minima-type inequalities’, [*Discr. Comput. Geom.*]{}, [**9**]{} (1993), 165–175.
J. Bourgain, ‘The sum-product theorem in $\Z_q$ with $q$ arbitrary’, [*J. Analyse Math*]{} [**106**]{} (2008), 1–93.
J. Bourgain and M. Z. Garaev, ‘Sumsets of reciprocals in prime fields and miltilinear Kloosterman sums’, [*Preprint*]{}.
N. G. de Bruijn, ‘On the number of positive integers $\le x$ and free prime factors $>y$, II’, [*Indag. Math.*]{} [**28**]{} (1966), 239–-247.
J. Friedlander and H. Iwaniec, [*The Brun-Titchmarsh theorem*]{}, [*Analytic number theory*]{} (Kyoto, 1996), 85–-93, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., 247, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1997.
J. Friedlander and H. Iwaniec, [*Opera de Cribro*]{}, American Mathematical Society, Colloquium Publications, 57, 2010.
H. Iwaniec and E. Kowalski, [*Analytic number theory*]{}, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2004.
A. A. Karatsuba, ‘New estimates of short Kloosterman sums’, [*Math. Notes*]{} [**88**]{}:3 (2010), 347–359. Prepared by E. A. Karatsuba, M. A. Korolev and I. S. Rezvyakova on notes and drafts of A. A. Karatsuba.
A. A. Karatsuba, ‘Analogues of Kloosterman sums’, [*Izv. Math.*]{} [**59**]{}:5 (1995), 971–981.
A. A. Karatsuba, ‘Fractional parts of functions of a special form’, [*Izv. Math.*]{} [**59**]{}:4 (1995), 721–740.
M. A. Korolev, ‘Incomplete Kloosterman sums and their applications’, [*Izv. Math.*]{} [**64**]{}:6 (2000), 1129–-1152.
M. A. Korolev, ‘Short Kloosterman sums with weights’, [*Math. Notes*]{} [**88**]{}:3 (2010), 374–-385.
T. Tao and V. Vu, [*Additive combinatorics*]{}, Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math., [**105**]{}, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We investigate the potential of the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) for measuring the magnetic fields in clusters of galaxies via Faraday rotation of background polarised sources. The populations of clusters and radio sources are derived from an analytical cosmological model, combined with an extrapolation of current observational constraints. We adopt an empirical model for the Faraday screen in individual clusters, gauged to observations of nearby clusters and extrapolate the polarisation properties for the radio source population from the NRAO VLA Sky Survey. We find that about 10 per cent of the sky is covered by a significant extragalactic Faraday screen. Most of it has rotation measures between 10 and 100 rad m$^{-2}$. We argue that the cluster centres should have up to about 5000 rad m$^{-2}$. We show that the proposed mid frequency aperture array of the SKA are well suited to make measurements for most of these rotation measure values, typically requiring a signal-to-noise of ten. We calculate the spacing of sources forming a grid for the purpose of measuring foreground rotation measures: it reaches a spacing of 36 arcsec for a 100 hour SKA observation per field. We also calculate the statistics for background RM measurements in clusters of galaxies. We find that a first phase of the SKA would allow us to take stacking experiments out to high redshifts ($>1$), and provide improved magnetic field structure measurements for individual nearby clusters. The full SKA aperture array would be able to make very detailed magnetic field structure measurements of clusters with more than 100 background sources per cluster up to a redshift of 0.5 and more than 1000 background sources per cluster for nearby clusters, and could for reasonable assumptions about future measurements of electron densities in high redshift clusters constrain the power law index for the magnetic field evolution to better than ${\Delta}\change{m}=0.4$, if the magnetic field in clusters should follow $B\propto(1+z)^\change{m}$.'
author:
- |
Martin Krause,$^{1,2,3}$[^1] Paul Alexander,$^{1,4}$ Rosie Bolton,$^1$ Jörn Geisbüsch,$^1$ David A. Green$^1$ and Julia Riley$^1$\
$^1$Astrophysics Group, Cavendish Laboratory, 19 J. J. Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE\
$^2$Max-Planck-Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstrasse, 85748 Garching, Germany\
$^3$Universitätssternwarte München, Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 München, Germany\
$^4$Kavli Institute for Cosmology Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA
date: 'Accepted 2009 August 5. Received 2009 July 6; in original form 2009 April 3'
title: Measurements of the Cosmological Evolution of Magnetic Fields with the Square Kilometre Array
---
\[firstpage\]
surveys — cosmology: observations — galaxies: clusters: general — magnetic fields — radio continuum: general — instrumentation: polarimeters
[@p[4.5cm]{}@rrrrr@]{} Name & VLA$^\mathrm{a}$ & SKA AA & SKA Dishes & SKA Dishes Phase 1\
$^\mathrm{b}$ & 70–180 & 10,000 & 10,000 & 1,200\
-------------------------------
frequencies of interest / GHz
-------------------------------
&
---------------------
0.3–0.34, 1.24–1.7,
4.5–5, 8.1–8.8
---------------------
& 0.3–1 & 0.8–10 & 0.8–10\
instantaneous bandwidth / MHz & 86 & 700 & 250 & 250\
1-h sensitivity / $\mu$Jy & 17 & 0.18 & 0.29 & 2.5\
--------------------------------------------
field of view / square degree$^\mathrm{c}$
--------------------------------------------
& $(0.7/f)^2$ & $250$ & $2$ & $~20^\mathrm{d}$\
Introduction
============
The plasma between the galaxies in clusters is magnetised. Observations at radio frequencies are our main quantitative probe of cluster magnetic fields. This is done by three main methods: equipartition arguments applied to cluster halo radio sources [e.g. @Gioea93], comparison of X-ray Inverse Compton (IC) with the radio synchrotron data in radio sources [e.g. @BPL98], and Faraday rotation of polarised radio sources within or behind the cluster, combined with X-ray data to determine the electron densities [@Kimea91; @CKB01]. The results have been reviewed regularly [@CT02; @GF04; @FG07]. Galaxy clusters are found to possess magnetic fields of typically a few, up to of order 10 $\mu$G.
The structure within cluster magnetic fields has been deduced from Faraday rotation of extended cluster radio sources [@Murgea04; @VE05; @Govea06; @Guiea08]. For the few cases observed so far, the data is consistent with a Kolmogorov-type power spectrum. Because the field is frozen into the plasma in the high conductivity limit, the structure of the field directly traces the underlying kinematics of the gas.
Current studies of magnetic fields in clusters are limited to a few nearby objects ($z < 0.1$). Hence, we have no means to answer questions regarding the origin and cosmological evolution of these fields. Correspondingly, few cosmological structure formation simulations have included magnetic fields. To date, none have the resolution to address directly the field evolution in galaxy clusters. However, from the eddy turnover times, and the high efficiency of the turbulent dynamo, one might expect that the magnetic energy should always be in equipartition with the turbulent kinetic energy (Ryu, private communication). Hence, studying the cosmological evolution of fields in clusters might not only lead to the origin of magnetism, but also trace cluster kinematics.
Magnetic fields in clusters of galaxies might be connected to the cooling flow problem. If cooling flows in nearby objects are quenched by weak jets, as has been often suggested [e.g. @KB03], the magnetic fields will be amplified up to equipartition with the enhanced kinetic energy level provided by the very same jets.
In this paper, we investigate the potential of these instruments, in particular the SKA, to measure cosmological evolution in cluster magnetic fields. We concentrate on Faraday rotation studies: the magnetic field along the line of sight rotates the polarisation angle by where $\lambda$ is the observing wavelength and we included the cosmological factor ($z$ is the redshift of the rotating Faraday screen) to account for the redshift of the radio emission traveling from the Faraday screen to us. This factor ensures that for background sources with redshifts much higher than the targeted cluster, the contribution to the rotation of the polarisation angle from the vicinity of the radio source will be negligible (unless that RM contribution is extremely high), since it occurs at much higher frequencies. RM is related to the thermal electron density, $n_\mathrm{e}$ (cm$^{-3}$), and the line-of-sight magnetic field, $B$ ($\mu$G), as: where the path-length d$l$ is measured in kpc.
The rotation measure has contributions from all along the line of sight, from the inter-galactic medium (IGM) in the vicinity of the source itself, from the intra-cluster medium (ICM) in the clusters along the line of sight, and from our own galaxy. The galactic contribution typically dominates at galactic latitudes below about $|b|<20^\circ$. Above $|b|>40^\circ$, the galactic contribution becomes smaller than $|\mathrm{RM}|<30 \,\mathrm{rad\, m^{-2}}$ [@SK80], and can be as small as $5 \,\mathrm{rad\, m^{-2}}$ [@Guiea08]. Hence, high rotation measure from extragalactic sources at high galactic latitudes can most likely be attributed to Faraday rotation within the gas in galaxy clusters.
Observations to date
--------------------
So far, the only individual cluster with a significant number of observed polarised members [*and*]{} background sources is the Coma cluster. Seven sources within 35 arcmin display a clearly enhanced $|\mathrm{RM}|$ between 35 and 65 rad m$^{-2}$ [@Kimea90; @Ferea95]. These sources, as well as control sources in the vicinity of the cluster, but avoiding sightlines through Coma’s ICM, have been observed in many individual pointings with the VLA. For the cluster A514, six embedded radio sources have been observed in individual VLA pointings. These show a decline of $|\mathrm{RM}_\mathrm{max}|$ from 154 rad m$^{-2}$ in the centre of the cluster to 15 rad m$^{-2}$ on the outskirts. Several other clusters, each with a few polarised sources, have been observed with similar results [@Ferea99; @Taylea01; @Govea06; @Guiea08]. Many clusters have only one or two sufficiently bright radio sources in or behind them[^2]. Therefore stacking has been used to infer a general RM value for nearby clusters [@CKB01]. A systematic increase in $|\mathrm{RM}|$ is found towards the cluster cores.
First attempts have been made to infer the magnetic field structure via the power-spectrum with Faraday rotation studies. For the cluster A2255, @Govea06 measure the Faraday rotation of four embedded radio sources. For different assumptions about the magnetic field power spectrum they can extrapolate this data to predict the synchrotron emission of the radio halo. Comparison to observations of the radio halo then constrains the power law index of the magnetic field’s 3D-power spectrum to the range three to four, consistent with Kolmogorov turbulence, with a possible spatial variation. The model also predicts polarisation of the halo, which is indeed detected.
This paper is structured as follows: First, we discuss the simulation method in Section \[sims\]. The Faraday rotation detection statistics and the implications for the measurement of the cosmological evolution of the magnetic field in clusters are presented in Section \[res\]. We discuss our findings in Section \[disc\], and summarize them in Section \[conc\]. Throughout, we use the following cosmological parameters: $h=0.7$, $\Omega_m=
0.3$, $\Omega_\Lambda=0.7$.
![Mass (top) and redshift (bottom) distribution of the adopted galaxy cluster model. See text for details of the model.[]{data-label="cls_props"}](dNdM.epsi){width="8.0cm"}
![Mass (top) and redshift (bottom) distribution of the adopted galaxy cluster model. See text for details of the model.[]{data-label="cls_props"}](dNdz.epsi){width="8.0cm"}
![Distribution of the fractional polarisation for the radio source model. The dark blue triple dot-dashed line represents the fit from @Tucea03 (not yet corrected for Faraday depolarisation). The solid black line represents our adaptation of this fit. This model is corrected for Faraday depolarisation by the polarisation dependent correction factor shown as red dot-dashed curve (divided by 1000). The model finally adopted in this paper is shown as a green dashed line. The polarisation distribution functions agree all at high fractional polarisations, were they are gauged against NVSS data.[]{data-label="fpol"}](fpol-mod.eps){width="8.0cm"}
{width="17cm"}
{width="17cm"}
The simulations {#sims}
===============
In order to assess the effect of cluster Faraday screens on the polarisation of background radio sources, a relatively sophisticated model of clusters and source populations is required.
Cluster model
-------------
In order to model the cluster number within an observed patch of sky (here 10 deg$^2$), we require a model for the cosmologically evolving cluster mass function. For this, we employ a cluster mass function whose multiplicity function [see e.g. @ST99] is based on a moving barrier shape ansatz and depends on a minimal number of parameters to provide a suitable fit to numerical simulations. In particular, the shape of the used mass function has been derived from N-body simulations of large cosmological volumes and high resolutions following the method described in Jenkins et al. (2001). The above model gives the cluster mass function as a function of redshift. We adopt a lower mass cutoff of $3\times 10^{13} \, M_\odot$ and for a given realisation of the sky model derive cluster counts as a function of redshift, making allowance for cosmic variance. Our resulting galaxy cluster catalogue contains 775 objects, with redshifts up to $\sim 2.3$. The properties of our generated galaxy cluster sample are illustrated in Fig. \[cls\_props\].
In our model, clusters are distributed randomly and radio sources are either background or foreground objects with respect to a given cluster. Every object is placed on a 3D grid, covering $\sqrt{10} \times \sqrt{10}$ square degree and the redshift space from zero to eight. The spatial resolution is $6000 \times
6000$ cells, and redshift space is covered by 240 cells. This gives an effective resolution of 1.9 arcsec and d$z=0.033$ in the third dimension.
Rotation measure model
----------------------
The observational data on the structure of magnetic fields in clusters is currently sparse. Based on @CKB01, we therefore employ a simple model for the rotation measure, with a peak value (justified in Section \[coreRM\] below) drawn from a uniform random distribution between $RM_0 = \pm
5000$ rad m$^{-2}$, and a decline according to a $\change{\beta}$-model: We use $\beta_\mathrm{\change{RM}}=1$ (see below) and $r_0=0.0636\, r_{200}$ [@BS2006], where $r_{200}$ is the radius within which there is an over-density of a factor 200 compared to the mean density of the universe at the redshift of the cluster. $r_{200}$ is roughly equal to the virial radius of the cluster. This results in core radii between 20 and 110 kpc, which corresponds to angular sizes between a few arcseconds to half an arcminute.
We calculate the rotation measure contribution out to the virial radius. We show in Fig. \[rm\_dist\] (top) the resulting distribution of rotation measures due to the simulated galaxy clusters. Much of the sky is covered with galaxy clusters, however, many of the systems have small rotation measures. About 12 per cent of the sky is covered with regions of at least 10 rad m$^{-2}$. The fraction reduces by a factor of about two if one considers rotation measures above 20 rad m$^{-2}$. In our chosen cosmology, only 34 of all clusters are located beyond a redshift of one. These are obviously smaller on average than the lower redshift population. Hence, essentially all of the area coverage happens up to a redshift of unity (Fig. \[rm\_cov\]). Therefore, up to this redshift, structure determination should be much easier than beyond.
Radio source model
------------------
To obtain realistic models of the radio source populations, we use the publically available SKADS (Square Kilometre Array European Design Study) synthetic radio source catalogue ([*SKADS simulated skies, S$^3$*]{}; @Wilmea08[^3]). The catalogue is derived from semi-empirical simulations of different populations of radio continuum sources and extends down to faint flux limits in order to allow observation simulations of high-sensitive future radio telescopes, such as the SKA. The source populations included in the catalogue are radio-loud ([FRi]{} and [FRii]{}) and radio-quiet AGNs as well as radio emitting starburst and normal disk galaxies. The luminosity function corresponding to each class of sources is derived empirically from available observations. The fits are extrapolated to low luminosities and assume redshift evolutions to assure the simulations are complete down to the instrumentally expected (faint) flux limits. Our version of the catalogue covers ten square degrees of sky out to a redshift of eight with a 1.4 GHz flux limit of 1 $\mu$Jy in Stokes $I$. @Wilmea08 for a detailed description of the radio source simulations.
Polarisation model
------------------
The degree of polarisation has to be determined for individual sources. We base our prediction of the polarisation of these radio sources on the statistics of the NRAO VLA Sky Survey (NVSS) catalogue [@Condea1998]. @Tucea03 have analysed polarisation statistics from the NVSS and other sources in detail. Depending on spectral shape and source flux, they derive median fractional polarisations between 1.12 and 1.77 per cent for NVSS sources. For the NVSS (1.4 GHz), the probability distribution of the fractional polarisation declines monotonically, but for higher observing frequencies, a turnover may be seen towards lower fractional polarisation. This is due to a systematic increase of the fractional polarisation with observing frequency. @Tucea03 explain these findings by Faraday depolarisation. Therefore, we expect that the low frequency distribution function also turns over at a not yet measured fractional polarisation. We therefore fit a lognormal function to the measured part of the fractional polarisation distribution function at 1.4 GHz. This results in a median value of 1.64 per cent and a standard deviation of 0.7 per cent. @Tucea03 believe that some of the NVSS sources are depolarised by differential Faraday rotation in intervening galaxy clusters. We argue that this would be much less so for SKA observations: The main reason is that with lower flux limit the radio source population changes. Extended jet sources dominate at high flux densities, and star forming galaxies at increasing distance and decreasing angular size at lower flux densities. For high redshift galaxy clusters, the depolarisation frequency is reduced by a factor $(1+z)^{-1}$. Extended sources behind nearby clusters will be much better resolved than by the NVSS (45 arcsec). For a turbulent power spectrum, the RM variations should have less power on smaller scales, hence the depolarisation frequency will be lower [@KAB2007].
adopt the de-depolarisation model from @Tucea03 We use 10 GHz as the reference frequency, assuming that Faraday depolarisation for NVSS sources mainly occurs below 10 GHz. The correction increases the fractional polarisation by a factor of about two, for those sources with low polarisation at 1.4 GHz, as shown in Fig. \[fpol\]. This effect has been measured already: @Taylea07 measure an increase of the fractional polarisation downwards of 100 mJy of a factor of three compared to the high flux density sources, in agreement with the model we propose.
Redshift distribution
---------------------
For decreasing flux limit, the radio source counts are dominated by sources of increasing redshift. We show the redshift distribution for different (polarised) flux limited samples in Fig. \[flsamps\]. For a polarised flux-density of 100 $\mu$Jy, roughly the level of current studies [@Taylea07], the median redshift is 0.6. It rises to 1.3 for a polarised flux limit of 0.1 $\mu$Jy, appropriate for a 100 h SKA observation. Even for the highest redshifts, we still predict thousands of background sources per square degree for this flux limit.
Required signal-to-noise for RM measurements {#snr_req}
--------------------------------------------
A distinctive feature of the next generation of radio telescopes is that a large bandwidth and high spectral resolution will be available simultaneously. Rotation measure synthesis is an established technique to analyse RM data. However, for the analysis of the RM-grid, we wish to extract information from the faintest detectable sources. For the faintest sources we will extract a single value of the rotation measure. Here, we consider the minimum signal-to-noise on a point source required for this. Faraday rotation leads to sinusoidal variation with respect to $\lambda^2$ across the band for the Stokes parameters $Q$ and $U$, modulated by a function giving the fractional polarisation as a function of wavelength and the intrinsic spectrum of the source. We consider normalised Stokes parameters: where $Q$ and $U$ are the ordinary Stokes parameters. To assess the required signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), required of a background source to measure a given foreground RM, we perform Monte-Carlo simulations. Our simulated data were for a background source with a spectral index of 0.7 – we simulate the observing band, taking a constant channel width of $\Delta\nu = 1$ MHz. We perform a combined $\chi^2$-fit to the normalised Stokes parameters, and use the flux at 1.4 GHz as a reference point for the SNR. For infinite SNR, the minimisation of $\chi^2$ would be straight forward. For decreasing SNR, additional minima appear in $\chi^2$ as a function of RM. For a SNR of 10 (100) the distance between these minima is of order 1 rad m$^{-2}$ (100 rad m$^{-2}$). A dense grid of starting guesses is therefore essential, for a gradient search method to find the global minimum. The actual values of $\chi^2$ differ only by a few percent, with the exception of the $\chi^2$ for the true RM, and its negative. We find that $\chi^2$ for the true RM and its negative, are significantly lower than all other RMs (five times the standard deviation for 400 starting guesses) for a signal to noise of four and higher.
Selecting on the combined $\chi^2$, we are able to recover the correct sign.
For RMs between 3 and 3000 rad m$^{-2}$, we find a minimum SNR between four and ten. This is true for the observing bands from 800 MHz to 1050 MHz as well as 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. In the following, we assume that a RM measurement may be done for any source detected at an SNR of ten in polarised flux.
Rotation measure grid
---------------------
For observations of nearby clusters, as well as the galaxy, it is useful to compute the root-area-average distance between polarised background sources. Fig. \[spacing\] shows the average grid spacing over observing time for the adopted SKA and SKA phase 1 sensitivities. We use the point source sensitivity limit according to @WW99: where, $k_\mathrm{B}$ is Boltzmann’s constant, $T_\mathrm{sys}$ is the telescope’s system temperature, $A$ the total effective area, $\mathrm{d}\nu$ the bandwidth, $\tau$ the observing time and $\epsilon$ the overall efficiency. Adopting a SNR of ten, we count the sources above the sensitivity limit for a particular telescope and observing time. The total source counts are roughly inversely proportional to the polarised flux, which is an effect of the adding up of the contributions from different source types. So, while the galaxies constitute the majority of the sources at low fluxes, other source types still contribute enough to flatten the overall distribution considerably.
Expected RM values
------------------
For each background source, we calculate the observed rotation measure by integrating through the simulation volume from the observed source to the observer. We show the cumulative histogram of all the rotation measures produced in this way in Fig. \[rmhisto\]. We find that the majority of rotation measures are in the range 10–100 rad m$^{-2}$, due to the fact that most of the area comes from the outskirts of the clusters. The highest rotation measures come of course from the cluster centres. For a given frequency band and rotation measure range, a particular SNR is required. As shown above in Section \[snr\_req\], both of the frequency ranges, 300 MHz to 1000 MHz (aperture array) and 800 MHz to 1050 MHz (dish array), should be suitable for the great majority of expected rotation measures.
Core rotation measures {#coreRM}
----------------------
For each radio source within three virial radii of a given cluster centre, we also calculate the respective impact parameter, i.e. the projected distance to the cluster centre. We show these rotation measures against the impact parameter, for low redshift ($z<0.5$), high mass ($M>10^{14}\,M_\odot$) clusters and a polarised flux limit of 1 $\mu$Jy in Fig. \[RMR\]. These cuts were employed in @CKB01, and their data is also shown in Fig. \[RMR\]. For distances greater than 1000 kpc and random sightlines, we encounter high RMs from neighbouring clusters. These are not present in @CKB01, as they select their control sample avoiding known X-ray clusters.
![Fraction of sky covered with RM$>10$ rad m$^{-2}$ (upper curve) and RM$>20$ rad m$^{-2}$ (lower curve).[]{data-label="rm_cov"}](RM_A-z.eps){width="8.0cm"}
![Distribution of radio sources against redshift for different polarised flux limits. From top to bottom, the curves represent: 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 $\mu$Jy. The median redshift is 0.6, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.3.[]{data-label="flsamps"}](rs-z_flim.eps){width="8.0cm"}
Results {#res}
=======
![RM-grid spacing for different telescopes and a SNR of ten.[]{data-label="spacing"}](grid_spacing-tau_Feb07_data_ska.epsi){width="8.0cm"}
![Cumulative histogram of all the rotation measures we expect to find within one square degree for a polarised flux limit of 1 $\mu$Jy (lower red curve) and 0.1 $\mu$Jy (upper black curve). In any case, we expect most of the measurements to yield rotation measures of order 10 to one hundred rad m$^{-2}$.[]{data-label="rmhisto"}](rm_histo.eps){width="8.0cm"}
Detection statistics {#stat}
--------------------
We show the detection statistics for the SKA aperture array and the phase 1 SKA in Fig. \[dstat\] and Table \[dstatt\]. The histograms demonstrate the progress that can be expected from the SKA, especially the full aperture array.
For a one hour phase 1 dish blind survey, we predict to find 30, 214, and 148 clusters in the redshift ranges 0–0.2, 0.2–0.5, 0.5–1, respectively, with , each. We also predict a few detections at higher redshift. This would allow stacking experiments for different redshift bins out to a redshift of at least one. Also, one could determine the decline of the average RM with cluster radius better than presently possible. This could answer the question weather the magnetic field energy density follows the thermal energy density. We also would have some chance to find about a couple of nearby clusters with 30–100 RMs, allowing an improved determination of the field structure. 30 background sources should be enough to constrain the power spectrum [@Govea06; @Guiea08]. Since the positions of the big nearby clusters are known, a targeted survey would certainly yield about this number of RMs.
A 100 hour phase 1 observation would result in 26 clusters $\change{z<0.5}$ with more than 30 background sources, and a couple of these having more than 300 background sources. This would allow to study the field structure in some detail. Up to a redshift of unity, nearly every cluster in the field of view should have at least one background source. Even beyond $z=1$, we predict to find 490 clusters with one background sources. This would allow the extension of the stacking method to this redshift.
The full SKA aperture array will finally allow to measure the structure of the magnetic field in great detail: Even for a 1 hour observation, each low redshift cluster will at least have 10 background sources 25 of which over hundred. We predict to find clusters in total with more than 30 background sources, distributed over a redshift range up to 0.5, promising good statistics of the variance of the power spectrum from cluster to cluster. More than 10,000 clusters would be detected with at least one RM measurement beyond a redshift of 0.5.
For a 100 hour pointing, we will be able to constrain the power spectrum for many clusters in the field of view up to a redshift of one ($>5,000$ clusters with more than 30 background sources). Up to a redshift of one, we expect $\change{>1,000}$ clusters with at least 100 RMs. Only for such clusters, we may expect to [*resolve*]{} the core in some cases, i.e. to have at least one background source within the cluster’s core radius. A 100 hour pointing would correspond roughly to the sensitivity limit used in Fig. \[rmmaxz\], where we show the decrease of the maximum rotation measure in any given cluster with redshift due to the decreased likelihood to get a background source within the core radius. 25 clusters should have more than 1000 background sources, and hence allow a very detailed determination of the magnetic field structure, even in the cluster cores.
![Maximum rotation measure seen against any given cluster in our sample against cluster redshift for a polarised flux limit of 0.1 $\mu$Jy. The red lines denote the median for sub-samples with corresponding redshifts (0–0.5, 0.5–1, 1–1.5, 1.5–2, $>2$). The purple lines denote the measured rotation measures if the true rotation measures would decline with redshift as $(1+z)^{-1}$, the orange line displays the medians for an increase proportional to $(1+z)$.[]{data-label="rmmaxz"}](RMmax_Z.eps){width="8.0cm"}
Due to the limited field of view, the full SKA dish array would not nearly reach the detection rates of the aperture array. Even a 100 hour blind survey would only yield clusters with more than 30 background sources.
{width="8.0cm"} {width="8.0cm"}
{width="8.0cm"} {width="8.0cm"}
{width="8.0cm"} {width="8.0cm"}
[lrrrrrrrrr]{} Redshift &\
interval & 0 & 1 & 2–3 & 4–9 & 10–29 & 30–100 & 100–299 & 300–999 & $1000+$\
\
0–0.2 &0 &0 &8 &20 &0 &2 &0 &0 &0\
0.2–0.5 &54 &160 &54 &0 &0 &0 &0 &0 &0\
0.5–1 &568 &148 &0 &0 &0 &0 &0 &0 &0\
$>1$ &522 &10 &0 &0 &0 &0 &0 &0 &0\
\
0–0.2 &0 &0 &0 &0 &8 &20 &0 &2 &0\
0.2–0.5 &0 &0 &4 &162 &102 &4 &0 &0 &0\
0.5–1 &2 &86 &444 &182 &2 &0 &0 &0 &0\
$>1$ &42 &370 &118 &2 &0 &0 &0 &0 &0\
\
0–0.2 &0 &0 &0 &0 &1.6 &1.2 &0 &0.2 &0\
0.2–0.5 &0 &0.2 &8.6 &14.6 &3.8 &0 &0 &0 &0\
0.5–1 &1 &32 &35.8 &2.8 &0 &0 &0 &0 &0\
$>1$ &15.2 &35.4 &2.6 &0 &0 &0 &0 &0 &0\
\
0–0.2 &0 &0 &0 &0 &0 &0 &2.4 &0.4 &0.2\
0.2–0.5 &0 &0 &0 &0 &8.6 &16.8 &1.8 &0 &0\
0.5–1 &0 &0 &0 &20.2 &49.2 &2.2 &0 &0 &0\
$>1$ & 0 &0.2 &10.2 &39.4 &3.4 &0 &0 &0 &0\
\
0–0.2 &0 &0 &0 &0 &100 &250 &0 &25 &0\
0.2–0.5 &0 &0 &50 &2150 &1150 &50 &0 &0 &0\
0.5–1 &25 &1175 &5550 &2175 &25 &0 &0 &0 &0\
$>1$ &575 &4750 &1300 &25 &0 &0 &0 &0 &0\
\
0–0.2 &0 &0 &0 &0 &0 &0 &150 &200 &25\
0.2–0.5 &0 &0 &0 &0 &125 &2475 &800 &0 &0\
0.5–1 &0 &0 &0 &350 &6925 &1675 &0 &0 &0\
$>1$ & 0 &0 &150 &4575 &1925 &0 &0 &0 &0\
Cosmological evolution
----------------------
Clusters at higher redshift cover less area of sky (up to a redshift of 1.6). Also, there are fewer sources behind a unit area at higher redshift. Therefore, the probability that a cluster centre has a background object decreases as the redshift increases. We plot the maximum rotation measure that we detect for a polarised flux limit of 0.1 $\mu$Jy against any given cluster versus the cluster redshift in Fig. \[rmmaxz\]. Out to a redshift of unity, there is still a good chance of finding sightlines through the cluster core. However, the median maximum rotation measure decreases by almost a factor of four for clusters with redshift 0.5–1 compared to ones at 0–0.5. The decrease in the median of the measured maximum rotation measure is almost exponential with redshift, with an $1/$e-decay length in $z$ close to 0.4. We can check the detectability of possible trends with redshift by multiplying the rotation measures with $(1+z)^n$ where we have chosen n to be $\pm1$ as example. The change in the median rotation measure is also indicated in Fig. \[rmmaxz\]. The decay length changes to 0.3 and 0.5, respectively. If we compare the redshift intervals 0–0.5 and 0.5–1, we predict a decrease of the median rotation measure by factors of about 3,4 and 5, respectively (compare with Table \[rmzcomp\], which is normalised to the low redshift value).
The statistical error on the median maximum rotation measure is given by: where $\sigma$ is the standard deviation and $N$ is the number of sources in the respective bin. We have calculated the median maximum RM for any given cluster and the statistical errors for a 100 h SKA AA observation for different values of $n$. This is shown in Table \[rmzcomp\]. Differences in the exponent $n$ of $0.3$ could be distinguished.
Discussion {#disc}
==========
We assess the capability of the SKA and its precursor, phase 1 SKA, to detect rotation measures and determine the evolution of magnetic fields in galaxy clusters. Our cluster and radio source simulations are based on standard cosmological methods and extrapolation of available observational data. We use a fractional polarisation model based on NVSS data, moderately corrected for Faraday depolarisation, at low fractional polarisations, only.
We find that about 10 per cent of the whole sky should be covered with rotation measures greater than 10 rad m$^{-2}$. If the cosmology is known, this may serve as an additional constraint to check for the proper removal of the Milky Way’s RM foreground. Large clusters can have a RM contribution from background clusters. However, the contamination occurs mainly on the outskirts of these clusters.
Our simulations show that core RMs of about 5000 rad m$^{-2}$ are necessary to explain the currently known stacking data, which shows about 200 rad m$^{-2}$ on the scale of the virial radius. RMs against central cluster radio sources often reach values comparable to our core RMs [@CT02]. This suggests that our assumption for the core RMs is realistic, but also that the functional form of the radial decline we assume is not too far from reality.
$n$ $z=0{-}0.5$ $z=0.5{-}1$ $z=1{-}1.5$ $z=1.5{-}2$ $z>2$
----- ------------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- -----------------
1 $1\pm0.015$ $0.346\pm0.010$ $0.168\pm0.012$ $0.066\pm0.009$ $0.024\pm0.058$
0.5 $1\pm0.015$ $0.298\pm0.009$ $0.128\pm0.009$ $0.047\pm0.007$ $0.016\pm0.038$
0.2 $1\pm0.015$ $0.276\pm0.008$ $0.109\pm0.007$ $0.039\pm0.005$ $0.012\pm0.029$
0 $1\pm0.015$ $0.259\pm0.008$ $0.099\pm0.007$ $0.034\pm0.005$ $0.010\pm0.024$
We show that with a phase 1 SKA, as defined in Table \[telcomp\], good stacking experiments should be possible, determining the average magnetic field profile locally and also out to a redshift of about one. The field structure should be measurable for some nearby clusters. If there would be a choice necessary between a deep survey and 100 one hour pointings, one should probably do the deep survey, since it already allows some field structure determination in nearby clusters, and promises to measure RMs for clusters with $z>1$.
With the full SKA AA aperture array, both a shallow 100 one hour pointing survey, and a deep survey promise very interesting results. A shallow 100 times one hour survey should detect RMs from about $10^6$ clusters, with complete redshift coverage. A deep 100 h one field survey will allow structure determination in unprecedented detail out to a redshift of one: over 1000 clusters will have more than 100 RM measurements, 25 of which over 1000 RMs.
Without phased array feeds on the majority of the dishes, as assumed here, the detection rates remain rather small for the full SKA dish array. However, having similar sensitivity than the aperture array, but coverage at higher frequencies, it would be a valuable complement for high RM regions (cluster centres), where the frequencies accessible to the aperture array would be depolarised.The RM grid density would be similar to the aperture array.
With the deep survey, we could measure the cosmic evolution of the RMs in clusters. If RM is proportional to $(1+z)^n$, we could measure $n$ to an accuracy of ${\Delta}n=0.3$. In order to determine the evolution of the magnetic field from this, one needs additional information on the electron densities. If we would adopt an accuracy for $n$ of ${\Delta}n=0.3$, and assume a similar behaviour and accuracy for the electron densities, to be measured via the Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect [@SKH05], we would end up with an accuracy for a power law index for the magnetic field ($B\propto(1+z)^m$) of $0.4$. This should be regarded as a conservative estimate, since it only takes into account information from the deep survey. Additional information from a shallow survey should improve the accuracy for the low redshift bins. Also, we have only used the information on the maximum RM per cluster. Taking into account the full data, will also improve the statistics.
For a polarised flux limit of 0.1 $\mu$Jy, as appropriate for a 100 hour SKA pointing and a SNR of ten, we predict a few 10,000 radio sources per square degree. These sources have a broad redshift distribution, with a median redshift of about one, rising with decreasing flux limit. We can hence expect not only to find the reported numbers of background sources, but also a sizable number of foreground sources, of order a few percent of the background sources, rising of course with cluster redshift. An accurate determination of the foreground RM opens up the possibility to detect a possible small mean cluster RM which would point to a super-cluster scale field connecting the cosmic web. This would be the first detection of such a field.
Conclusions {#conc}
===========
We have modelled the distribution of rotation measures for the SKA. We calculate the average distance between rotation measures to be between 6 arcminutes for a one hour observation with the early SKA and 36 arcseconds for a hundred hour pointing with the full SKA. We expect to find rotation measures mostly up to 100 rad m$^{-2}$, with the cluster centres reaching up to several thousand. The planned SKA mid frequency aperture array (300–1000 MHz) would be well suited for the great majority of sources. High RM cluster centres would require targeted high frequency follow up observations. We find that current Faraday rotation studies only represent the outskirts of galaxy clusters. The average RM should increase steadily towards the core to reach typically several thousand rad m$^{-2}$.
A phase 1 SKA would already improve the statistics for current stacking experiments considerably, and make this experiment viable out to redshifts $z>1$. The full SKA aperture array would detect over a million clusters with at least one background source each in a shallow 100 hour survey, and allow detailed field structure determination ($>1000$ clusters with more than 100 background sources each) with a deep survey. If the cosmological evolution of the rotation measures is proportional to $(1+z)^n$, the SKA would be able to measure $n$ to an accuracy of 0.3. Compared to the few RMs known for a few nearby clusters today, this will revolutionise our knowledge of rotation measures in galaxy clusters. Provided the electron densities can be measured via the Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect at high redshift, we can expect to follow the build-up of cosmic magnetism with the SKA.
Acknowledgments {#acknowledgments .unnumbered}
===============
This activity was (partly) supported by the European Community Framework Programme 6, Square Kilometre Array Design Studies (SKADS), contract no 011938.
P., [Faulkner]{}, A., 2009, SKA Memo 108, [http://www.skatelescope.org/]{}
J., [Pislar]{} V., [Lima Neto]{} G. B., 1998, MNRAS, 296, L23
A., [Salucci]{} P., 2006, A&A, 452, 75
C. L., [Taylor]{} G. B., 2002, ARA&A, 40, 319
T. E., [Kronberg]{} P. P., [B[ö]{}hringer]{} H., 2001, ApJ, 547, L111
J. J., [Cotton]{} W. D., [Greisen]{} E. W., [Yin]{} Q. F., [Perley]{} R. A., [Taylor]{} G. B., [Broderick]{} J. J., 1998, AJ, 115, 1693
L., [Dallacasa]{} D., [Giovannini]{} G., [Tagliani]{} A., 1995, A&A, 302, 680
L., [Dallacasa]{} D., [Govoni]{} F., [Giovannini]{} G., [Taylor]{} G. B., [Klein]{} U., 1999, A&A, 344, 472
Feretti L., Giovannini G., 2008, in Plionis M., López-Cruz O., Hughes D., eds, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 740, A Pan-Chromatic View of Clusters of Galaxies and the Large-Scale Structure, Springer, Dordrecht, p. 143
G., [Feretti]{} L., [Venturi]{} T., [Kim]{} K.-T., [Kronberg]{} P. P., 1993, ApJ, 406, 399
F., [Feretti]{} L., 2004, Int. J. Modern Phys. D, 13, 1549
F., [Murgia]{} M., [Feretti]{} L., [Giovannini]{} G., [Dolag]{} K., [Taylor]{} G. B., 2006, A&A, 460, 425
D., [Murgia]{} M., [Govoni]{} F., [Parma]{} P., [Gregorini]{} L., [de Ruiter]{} H. R., [Cameron]{} R. A., [Fanti]{} R., 2008, A&A, 483, 699
C. R., [Binney]{} J., 2003, MNRAS, 338, 837
K.-T., [Kronberg]{} P. P., [Dewdney]{} P. E., [Landecker]{} T. L., 1990, ApJ, 355, 29
K.-T., [Kronberg]{} P. P., [Tribble]{} P. C., 1991, ApJ, 379, 80
M., [Alexander]{} P., [Bolton]{} R., 2007, in Proceedings of Science, From Planets to Dark Energy: the Modern Radio Universe, POS(MRU)109, [http://pos.sissa.it/]{}
M., [Govoni]{} F., [Feretti]{} L., [Giovannini]{} G., [Dallacasa]{} D., [Fanti]{} R., [Taylor]{} G. B., [Dolag]{} K., 2004, A&A, 424, 429
R. T., [Alexander]{} P., [Cordes]{} J. M., [Dewdney]{} P. E., [Ekers]{} R. D., [Faulkner]{} A. J., [Gaensler]{} B. M., [Hall]{} P. J., [Jonas]{} J. L., [Kellermann]{} K. L., 2007, SKA Memo 100, [http://www.skatelescope.org/]{}
N., [Kosowsky]{} A., [Holder]{} G., 2005, ApJ, 635, 22
R. K., [Tormen]{} G., 1999, MNRAS, 308, 119
M., [Kronberg]{} P. P., 1980, ApJ, 242, 74
A. R., [Stil]{} J. M., [Grant]{} J. K., [Landecker]{} T. L., [Kothes]{} R., [Reid]{} R. I., [Gray]{} A. D., [Scott]{} D., [Martin]{} P. G., [Boothroyd]{} A. I., [Joncas]{} G., [Lockman]{} F. J., [English]{} J., [Sajina]{} A., [Bond]{} J. R., 2007, ApJ, 666, 201
G. B., [Govoni]{} F., [Allen]{} S. W., [Fabian]{} A. C., 2001, MNRAS, 326, 2
M., [Mart[í]{}nez-Gonz[á]{}lez]{} E., [Toffolatti]{} L., [Gonz[á]{}lez-Nuevo]{} J., [de Zotti]{} G., 2003, New Astron. Rev., 47, 1135
C., [En[ß]{}lin]{} T. A., 2005, A&A, 434, 67
R. J., [Miller]{} L., [Jarvis]{} M. J., [Mauch]{} T., [Levrier]{} F., [Abdalla]{} F. B., [Rawlings]{} S., [Kl[ö]{}ckner]{} H.-R., [Obreschkow]{} D., [Olteanu]{} D., [Young]{} S., 2008, MNRAS, 388, 1335
J., [Walker]{} R., 1999, in Taylor G. B., Carilli C. L., Perley R. A., eds, ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 180, Synthesis Imaging in Radio Astronomy II, Astron. Soc. Pac., San Francisco, p. 171
\[lastpage\]
[^1]: E-mail: [[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]]{}
[^2]: See: [http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/[’176]{}kdolag/BCluster/]{}.
[^3]: See: [http://s-cubed.physics.ox.ac.uk/]{}.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We introduce a class of stochastic weakly coupled map lattices, as models for studying heat conduction in solids. Each particle on the lattice evolves according to an internal dynamics that depends on its energy, and exchanges energy with its neighbors at a rate that depends on its internal state. We study energy fluctuations at equilibrium in a diffusive scaling. In some cases, we derive the hydrodynamic limit of the fluctuation field.'
author:
- 'François Huveneers[^1]'
title: Energy fluctuations in simple conduction models
---
Introduction {#sec: Introduction}
============
It is generally expected that the temperature profile of thermally isolated solids relaxes according to some non-linear heat equation $$\partial_t T \; = \; \nabla \big( D(T) \nabla T \big).$$ The derivation of this equation, starting from a microscopic hamiltonian dynamics, is one of the major open problems in statistical mechanics out of equilibrium [@bon][@liv]. Very idealized models of solid constitute a possible starting point to develop our understanding on the problem, and in fact, at the present time, even such cases can be challenging to analyze (see [@eck] for a good example of such a philosophy).
Lattice gases furnish the first examples where the heat equation can be recovered through a diffusive rescaling of space and time. Each atom reduces here to a point on a lattice, is characterized by its energy only, and interacts stochastically with its neighbors. The stochastic interaction is a reasonable approximation for particles that should evolve according to some chaotic internal dynamics. A set of independent random walks (IRW), the simple symmetric exclusion process (SSEP) [@kip], and the Kipnis Marchioro Presutti model (KMP) [@kip2], constitute three cases where the heat equation can be easily derived. These systems may be closer to physics than what could be thought at the first glance: in [@huv], an example of noisy hamiltonian system is found, that gives rise to the SSEP in a weak coupling limit.
This said, true atoms should clearly be described by position and momentum, and not only energy. To move towards a more realistic situation, let us thus consider a lattice where particles at the nodes now have some internal degree of freedom. We assume the local dynamics of particles to have good ergodic properties, and the interaction between them to be weak and controlled by a parameter $\epsilon >0$. So, individual atoms will reach their own equilibrium at a smaller time scale than energy is exchanged.
Much progress has been recently accomplished in the understanding of these systems, by means of a two-stage analysis, as outlined in [@gas]. First, letting $\epsilon \rightarrow 0$ and rescaling time properly, an autonomous stochastic process for the energy alone is obtained. Second, rescaling space and time diffusively, the heat equation is derived starting from this mesoscopic stochastic process. The first part of this program has now been rigorously accomplished for a purely hamiltonian dynamics [@dol]. Though in a rather different way, the distinction of two different time-scales also has allowed to better understand the conductivity of weakly anharmonic solids [@aok][@luk].
The introduction of two successive limits is however somehow artificial. One eventually would like to fix some, possibly small, $\epsilon > 0$, and directly consider the diffusive limit. Results in that direction are few. Let us quote three of them. First, in [@ber], the heat equation is recovered starting from a noisy harmonic chain (see also [@fri] for fluctuations at equilibrium). The proof rests on the fact that an exact fluctuation-dissipation decomposition is available there. Second, a deterministic coupled map lattice is analyzed in [@bri], and diffusion of an initially localized energy packet is shown. The dynamics of particles is there assumed to be independent of energy. Third, fluctuations of energy for a noisy hamiltonian system at equilibrium are considered in [@oll] (see also [@her] for a simpler model) ; the fluctuation field is shown to converge to a generalized Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. Some level of symmetry of the generator, the sector condition, is needed to derive this result.
In this paper, we introduce models of heat conduction that are conceptually very simple. They maybe will even look a bit cheap compared to the aforementioned examples. Though, the analysis reveals that nowadays techniques do not directly apply to describe how energy diffuses in the cases we consider. We will in fact need to look at particular situations in order to derive rigorous results. To make this more concrete, let us now briefly outline the content.
In Section \[sec: Models\], we define three models of conduction. In a sense made precise by below, they constitute respective versions of the IRW, SSEP and KMP models, where, now, atoms have an internal degree of freedom. The interaction between near particles is controlled by a parameter $\epsilon >0$. The models so obtained are non-gradient and do not satisfy the sector condition.
Like in [@oll] and [@her], we study the fluctuations of energy in equilibrium, as this might be the easiest problem to look at. We introduce the fluctuation field in Section \[sec: Fluctuation field\], and we state there Proposition \[the: limit fluctuation field\], that will allow us to derive the hydrodynamic limit of this field in some cases. While it is essentially a variation on a classical method [@kip], we here assume that exists an approximative fluctuation-dissipation decomposition of the microscopic current in a particular sense. We hope that this kind of result can be of some use elsewhere. The proof is postponed to Section \[sec: proof limit fluctuation field\].
Explicit results are gathered in Section \[sec: Explicit results\]. The hydrodynamic limit of the field in the first order in $\epsilon$ is derived in Theorem \[the: first order\]. As a corollary, a weak coupling limit is shown, where $\epsilon$ is sent to 0 after a diffusive rescaling of space and time. This kind of limit is a bit more satisfactory than the one in [@dol][@huv][@liv], where $\epsilon$ was sent to 0 for a fixed number of particles without any rescaling of space. It also avoids the two-stage procedure of [@gas]. One then approximates, like in [@bri], the local dynamics by a process independent of energy. In Theorem \[the: independent dynamics\], the hydrodynamic limit of the fluctuation field is obtained under that hypothesis for any small enough $\epsilon >0$. While, with respect to [@bri], we deal with a rather particular case, our proof is much shorter, and we are not limited to an initially localized energy packet.
Models {#sec: Models}
======
Throughout all the paper, $\epsilon > 0$ represents a strictly positive number. Let us consider a set of $N \ge 3$ identical particles. The coordinates of the particles are indexed by a point in the periodic one-dimensional lattice $\Z_N$ of integers modulo $N$. They form thus a one-dimensional chain with periodic boundary conditions. Each particle is characterized by a local degree of freedom, and a non negative energy, so that the phase space $\mathsf X$ is given by $$\mathsf X \; = \; \mathsf M^N \times \R_+^N.$$ where $$\mathsf M \; = \; \T \times \{ -1,1\} \; = \; (\R/\Z) \times \{ -1,1\}.$$ A point $r\in \mathsf M$ is written as $r = (q,\varsigma) \in \T \times \{ -1,1\}$ ; a point ${{\mathbf{x}}}\in \mathsf X$ is written as $${{\mathbf{x}}}\; = \;
({{\mathbf{r}}}, {{\mathbf{e}}})
\; = \;
(r_1 , \dots , r_N , e_1, \dots , e_N)
\; = \;
({{\mathbf{q}}}, {{\boldsymbol{\varsigma}}}, {{\mathbf{e}}})
\; = \;
(q_1 , \dots , q_N , \varsigma_1, \dots , \varsigma_N, e_1, \dots , e_N) .$$ We set also $x_k = (r_k,e_k) = (q_k, \varsigma_k, e_k)$ for $1 \le k \le N$.
We see $q_k$ as the position of particle $k$, and $\varsigma_k$ as the sign of its velocity. It could have seemed more natural to first define the usual hamiltonian variables $q_k$ and $p_k$, and then express the energy in function of them. However, for our purposes, the distinction between the local variable $r_k$ and the energy $e_k$ is the most important. In fact, we almost never will make use of the variables $q_k$ and $\varsigma_k$. We assume that each particle have a ground state energy $\mathsf e_0 > 0$, and we think of $e_k$ as being the extra amount of the energy of particle $k$ with respect to $\mathsf e_0$.
We consider a stochastic dynamics defined through the generator $$L \; = \; L' + \epsilon \, L'' \; = \; \sum_{k\in \Z_N} \big( L'_k + \epsilon \, L''_k \big)$$ acting on functions on the phase space $\mathsf X$. Here $L'_k$ governs the internal dynamics of particle $k$, and $L''_k$ the exchanges of energy between particles $k$ and $k+1$. We denote by $X_t$ the process generated by $L$ at time $t \ge 0$. Let us now concretely define $L'$ and $L''$.
Local dynamics
--------------
Let $1 \le k \le N$. One defines $$L'_k u
\; = \;
A'_k u + S'_k u
\; = \;
\varsigma_k\, \sqrt{\mathsf e_0 + e_k} \multiplication \partial_{q_k} u
\, + \,
\sqrt{\mathsf e_0 + e_k} \multiplication \big( u(\dots , - \varsigma_k, \dots) - u (\dots, \varsigma_k , \dots) \big).$$ Here $A'_k$ and $S'_k$ denote respectively the symmetric and antisymmetric part of $L'_k$, with respect to the uniform probability measure $\mu_\mathrm U$ on $\mathsf M$. So particle $k$ moves freely on the circle at speed $\sqrt{\mathsf e_0 + e_k}$ and, at random times, the sign of its velocity gets flipped. We will make use of the following notation: given a function $u$ on $\mathsf X$, one writes $$\langle u | \mathbf e \rangle \; = \; \int_{\mathsf M^N} u (\mathbf r , \mathbf e) \, \mu_{\mathrm U} (\dd \mathbf r).$$
No sector condition holds. Moreover, the dynamics generated by the symmetric part $S_k'$ alone is very degenerated since it does not affect the physical location $q_k$. The dynamics generated by $L'$ quickly relaxes to equilibrium: there exists a constant $c >0$, independent of $N$ such that, given a function $u$ satisfying $u(\cdot, \mathbf e) \in \Lp^2(\mathsf M^N, \mu_{\mathrm U})$ and $\langle u | \mathsf e \rangle = 0$ for any $\mathbf e \in \R_+^{N}$, it holds that $$\| \ed^{L' t} u (\cdot, \mathbf e) \|_{2}
\; \le \;
\ed^{-ct} \| u (\cdot , \mathbf e) \|_{2}.$$ This follows from an explicit diagonalisation of $L_k'$ (see also [@huv] or [@dolb] for two different approaches). Given $e_k \in \R_+$, the functions $$\varphi_{l,\tau} (q_k, \varsigma_k) \; = \; \frac{1}{Z(l,\tau)} \big( 2i\pi l \sqrt{\mathsf e_0 + e_k} + \delta_0 (\lambda_{l,\tau}) + \lambda_{l,\tau}\varsigma_k \big) \ed^{2i\pi l q_k},$$ with $Z(l,\tau)$ a normalization factor, and with $$\lambda_{l,\tau}
\; = \;
- \sqrt{\mathsf e_0 + e_k} \Big( 1+ i\tau\sqrt{ (2\pi l)^2 - 1} \Big),
\qquad l \in \Z, \; \; \tau \in \{ - 1, +1 \},$$ form an orthonormal basis of $\Lp^2 (\mathsf M)$ such that $$L_k \varphi_{l,\tau} (q_k, \varsigma_k) \; = \; \lambda_{l,\tau} \varphi_{l,\tau} (q_k, \varsigma_k).$$ It is seen that $\lambda_{l,\tau} = 0$ if and only if $l = 0$ and $\tau = 1$ (with the convention $\sqrt{-1}=+i$), and that otherwise $\Re \lambda_{l,\tau} \le - \sqrt{\mathsf e_0}$. Our claim then follows by tensorization since all particles evolve independently under the dynamics generated by $L'$.
We will use this information in the following form. Let $f$ be a function on $\mathsf X$ such that $f(\cdot, \mathsf e)\in \Lp^2(\mathsf M^N,\mu_\mathrm U)$ and that $\langle f|\mathbf e \rangle = 0$ for all $\mathbf e$. Then there exists a unique function $u$ on $\mathsf X$ such that $u (\cdot , \mathbf e) \in \Lp^2(\mathsf M^N,\mu_\mathrm U)$ and $\langle u | \mathbf e \rangle = 0$ for all $\mathbf e$, that solves the Poisson equation $$\label{solution Poisson equation L'}
- L' u = f.$$ We call this function $u$ the fundamental solution to this Poisson equation. Moreover there exists a constant $\mathrm C < +\infty$ independent of $N$ and $f$ such that $$\label{norm solution Poisson equation L'}
\| u (\cdot, \mathbf e) \|_2 \; \le \; \mathrm C \, \|f (\cdot , \mathbf e) \|_2$$ for every $\mathbf e\in \R^N$. This follows from the representation $$u \; = \; \int_0^{\infty} \ed^{L' t} f \, \dd t,$$ or directly from the explicit diagonalisation of $L'$.
Interactions
------------
In a one-dimensional chain of oscillators evolving according to the laws of classical mechanics, the strength of the force between two atoms depends on their relative physical location, and the instantaneous current between them is a function their positions in phase space. To mimic this feature in our model, let us introduce a nonzero uniformly bounded symmetric function $\chi \ge 0$ on $\mathsf M^2$. The function $\chi$ will make the rate of exchange of energy depend on the locations of particles. We set also $$\overline{\chi} \; = \; \int_{\mathsf M^2} \chi (r_0,r_1) \, \mu_{\mathrm U} (\dd \mathbf r).$$ As an example, one can take $$\chi (r_0,r_1) \; = \; \chi (q_0 , q_1) \; = \; \chi_{[a,b]^2} (q_0,q_1),$$ where $\chi_{[a,b]}$ denotes the characteristic function of some interval $[a,b]\subset \T$. Then, the interaction between two particles will only be possible if they both are in the interval $[a,b]$.
We will define three possible ways of interacting, and so three different models. In the three cases, the interaction will be purely stochastic, meaning that the operator $L''$ is symmetric with respect to the canonical invariant measures defined in Section \[sec: Fluctuation field\]. This is admittedly in sharp contrast with hamiltonian interactions. We may view our models as perturbations of the IRW, SSEP or KMP dynamics respectively. Indeed, the operator $\mathcal L$ acting on functions $u$ that depend only on the energies $\mathbf e$, and defined by $$\label{projection energy space}
\mathcal L u \; = \; \frac{1}{\overline{\chi}} \, \langle L'' u | {{\mathbf{e}}}\rangle ,$$ will be nothing else than the generator of these dynamics.
#### Model 1: Exchanging bits of energy.
Let us restrict the set of reachable energies to $\N = \{0,1,2, \dots\}$, so that the phase space writes $\mathsf X = \mathsf M^N \times \N^N$. Let $1 \le k \le N$. One defines $$L_k'' u \; = \;
\chi (r_k , r_{k+1}) \multiplication
\big( e_k (u \circ \sigma_k^{+} - u) + e_{k+1} (u \circ \sigma_{k+1}^{-} - u) \big)
$$ with $$\begin{aligned}
\sigma_k^- ({{\mathbf{x}}}) \; = &\; (\mathbf r , e_1 , \dots , e_{k-1} + 1, e_k -1, e_{k+1}, \dots , e_N), \\
\sigma_k^+ ({{\mathbf{x}}}) \; = &\; (\mathbf r , e_1 , \dots , e_{k-1}, e_k -1, e_{k+1} + 1, \dots , e_N).\end{aligned}$$ So, with such an interaction, particles tend to give part of their energy to their neighbors at a rate proportional to the value of their energy times the value of $\chi$. The instantaneous current is defined through the relation $$L e_k \; = \; \epsilon L'' e_k \; = \; \epsilon \big( j_{k-1,k} - j_{k,k+1} \big)$$ with $$\label{current}
j_{k,k+1} \; = \; \chi (r_k, r_{k+1}) (e_k - e_{k+1}).$$
#### Model 2: Exchanging the whole energy.
Let us further restrict the set of reachable energies to $\{0,1\}$, so that the phase space now writes $\mathsf X = \mathsf M^N \times \{0,1\}^N$. Let $1 \le k \le N$. One defines $$L''_k u \; = \; \chi (r_k , r_{k+1}) \big( u\circ \sigma_k - u \big)$$ with $$\sigma_k \mathbf x \; = \; (\mathbf r , e_1 , \dots , e_{k+1}, e_k , \dots , e_N).$$ So here, near particles may exchange their energy. It is checked that the instantaneous current is the same as in the first model.
Let us stress at this point that the dynamics still should perfectly make sense if energy was allowed to take more than two values. However, since energy is only exchanged between particles, there should be $n-1$ conserved quantities if energy was allowed to take $n$ values. It is not at all clear in that case that an initial density of energy should evolve autonomously in the hydrodynamic regime, since an initial macroscopic state should in fact be specified by the value of each conserved quantity. We have thus limited ourselves to the case of two reachable energies only, in order to avoid extra complications.
#### Model 3: Sharing energy.
Energy is here allowed to take any non negative value, so that the phase space is given by $\mathsf X = \mathsf M^N \times \R_+^N$. Let $1 \le k \le N$. One defines $$L''_k u \; = \; 2\,\chi (r_k , r_{k+1}) \big( T_k - Id \big) u$$ with $$T_k u \; = \; \int_0^1 u ({{\mathbf{r}}}, e_1, \dots , p(e_k + e_{k+1}), (1-p)(e_k + e_{k+1}), \dots , e_N) \, \dd p.$$ The instantaneous current is the same as in the two previous models. A similar dynamics is considered in [@eck].
Fluctuation field {#sec: Fluctuation field}
=================
The derivation of the heat equation requires to consider an energy profile initially out of equilibrium. In this work, like in [@oll][@her], we will however only look at small perturbations out of equilibrium. To see what small means, let us assume that our system is in equilibrium at an inverse temperature $0 < \beta < +\infty$ (see below), and let us denote by $\langle e \rangle_\beta$ the average energy of a particle. Let $I \subset \T$ be an interval. For a typical event in the invariant measure, one has $$\sum_{k : k/N \in I} \big( e_k - \langle e \rangle_\beta \big) \; \sim \; \sqrt{N}.$$ So let $$\mathcal E_{t} (I) \; = \; \frac{1}{\sqrt N} \sum_{k: k/N \in I} \big( e_k (t) - \langle e \rangle_\beta \big)$$ be the macroscopic observable we look at. The random variable $\mathcal E_t (I)$ is expected to fluctuate in a diffusive time-scale. So a typical kind of probability that one would like to estimate in the limit $N\rightarrow \infty$ is $$\Proba \big( \mathcal E_{N^2 t} (I) \simeq b \, | \, \mathcal E_{0} (I) \simeq a \big),$$ where $a,b\in\R$, and where $x \simeq a$ means $x \in [a-\delta, a+ \delta]$ for some small $\delta >0$. So in fact, we are considering initial profiles that have an excess of energy of order $\sqrt{N}$ in subintervals of $\T$, rather than of order $N$ for a profile truly out of equilibrium
We now need some definitions. Let us first define canonical equilibrium measures. For our three models $$\langle u \rangle_\beta \; = \;
\int_{\mathsf X} u ( {{\mathbf{r}}}, {{\mathbf{e}}}) \, \mu_\mathrm U (\dd {{\mathbf{r}}}) \, \mu_\beta (\dd \mathbf e),$$ where, for $u = u ({{\mathbf{e}}})$, one has $$\begin{aligned}
\mu_\beta (u) \; &= \;
\frac{1}{Z(\beta)} \sum_{{{\mathbf{e}}}\in \N^N} \frac{(1/\beta)^{e_1 + \dots + e_N}}{e_1 ! \dots e_N !} \, u ({{\mathbf{e}}})
\qquad \text{for Model 1,} \\
\mu_\beta (u) \; &= \;
\frac{1}{Z(\beta)} \sum_{{{\mathbf{e}}}\in \{0,1\}^N} \ed^{-\beta (e_1 + \dots + e_N)} \, u({{\mathbf{e}}})
\qquad \text{for Model 2,} \\
\mu_\beta (u) \; &= \; \frac{1}{Z(\beta)} \int_{\R_+^N} \ed^{-\beta (e_1 + \dots + e_N)} \, u ({{\mathbf{e}}}) \, \dd {{\mathbf{e}}}\qquad \text{for Model 3,}\end{aligned}$$ with $Z(\beta)$ a normalization factor.
Let us next define the fluctuation field $\big( Y^{(N)}_{N^2 t}\big)_{t\ge 0}$. For any smooth test function $H$ on $\T$, we define $$Y^{(N)}_{N^2t} (H)
\; = \;
\frac{1}{\sqrt N} \sum_{k=1}^N H(k/N) \big( e_k (N^2t) - \langle e \rangle_\beta \big).$$ Most of the time we will just write $Y$ instead of $Y^{(N)}$. Formally, $(Y_{N^2t})_{t}$ is as a random process with values in $\mathcal D (\R_+, \mathcal H_{-3})$, where $\mathcal D$ denotes the set of cad-lag functions, and where $\mathcal H_{-3}$ denotes the Sobolev space of distributions $Z$ on $\T$ with norm $\| Z \|_{-3}^2 = \sum_{k\in \Z} k^{-6} |Z(\mathsf f_k)|^2$, with $\mathsf f_k (x) = \ed^{2i \pi k x}$.
Let us finally define the stationary generalized Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process $(\mathrm Y_t)_{t\ge 0} \in \mathcal C (\R_+, \mathcal H_{-3})$, where $\mathcal C$ denotes the set of continuous functions, for some diffusion constant $\epsilon D >0$ and thermal capacity $\sigma^2 > 0$. We here have anticipated the fact that, in our applications, the diffusion constant will be of order $\epsilon$. Given a smooth test function $H$ on $\T$, and for $t\ge 0$, we let $H_t$ be the solution to the heat equation $$\label{evolution heat equation}
H_0 = H, \qquad \partial_t H_t \; = \; \epsilon D \multiplication \partial^2_x H_t.$$ Our definition of $(\mathrm Y_t)_{0 \le t \le T}$ is then as follows. First, $\mathrm Y_0(H)$ is a centered Gaussian random variable with variance $$\label{variance Ornstein Ulhenbeck}
\sigma^2 \int_\T H^2_0 (x) \, \dd x.$$ Next, for $t \ge 0$, we have the decomposition $$\mathrm Y_t (H) \; = \; \mathrm Y_0 (H_t) + M_t (H),$$ where $M_t(H)$ is a Gaussian centered martingale, independent of $\mathrm Y_0 (H_t)$, and with variance $$2 \epsilon D \sigma^2 \int_0^t \bigg( \int_\T (\partial_x H_s (x))^2\, \dd x \bigg) \, \dd s.$$ Since $\mathrm Y_t$ is a distribution, it holds that $\mathrm Y_t(aG + bH) = a \mathrm Y_t (G) + b Y_t (H)$ for any smooth $G$ and $H$ on $\T$, and $a,b\in \R$. Using this property, it is direct to recover the more classical definition of the stationary Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process: $(\mathrm Y_t)_{t\ge 0}$ is the only stationary Gaussian process with zero mean and covariance $$\Mean \big( \mathrm Y_t (H) \mathrm Y_0 (G) \big)
\; = \;
\sigma^2 \int_{\R^2} \frac{\ed^{-\frac{(x-y)^2}{4\epsilon t D}}}{\sqrt{4\pi \epsilon t D}} H(x) G(y) \, \dd x \dd y.$$
Our aim is to show that $(Y_{N^2 t})_t$ converges in some sense to $(\mathrm Y_t)_t$ as $N\rightarrow \infty$, with $$D \; = \; D(\beta) \; > \; 0
\qquad \text{and} \qquad
\sigma^2 \; = \; \sigma^2(\beta) \; = \; \langle e^2 \rangle_\beta - \langle e \rangle_\beta^2.$$ We say that a function $D\multiplication\nabla e$ on $\mathsf X$ is gradient if it is of the form $$\label{gradient function}
D\multiplication \nabla e \; = \; \sum_{k\in\Z_N} D_k \multiplication (e_k - e_{k+1}).$$ We then also write $D = \sum_{k\in \Z_N} D_k$. This quantity depends on the representation of the gradient function $D \multiplication\nabla e$, which is not unique due to periodic boundary conditions. This however will create no trouble in the sequel. We will use the following proposition, shown in Section \[sec: proof limit fluctuation field\], to derive our results. The hypotheses are close to optimal for the proof, but could be quite simplified for our applications.
\[the: limit fluctuation field\] Let $\epsilon' \ge 0$. Let $\beta >0$. Let $\sigma^2 (\beta) = \langle e^2 \rangle_\beta - \langle e \rangle_\beta^2$. Assume that there are sequences of functions $\big((D\multiplication \nabla e)_N\big)_N$, $(u_N)_N$ and $(g_N)_N$ in $\Lp^2 (\mathsf X, \langle \cdot \rangle_\beta)$, that may depend on $\beta$, such that $$- L u_N - \epsilon \, \big(j_{0,1} - (D\multiplication \nabla e)_N \big) \; = \; \epsilon' \, L'' g_N,$$ and that $$\lim_{N\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{N^2} \sum_{k\in \Z_N} | \langle \tau_k u_N , u_N \rangle_\beta | \; = \; 0.$$ We moreover assume that, for any $k\in \Z_N$, $(D_k)_N$ converges as $N\rightarrow \infty$, that the following quantities converge as $N\rightarrow \infty$: $$\sum_{k\in{\Z_N}} |(D_k)_N|,
\qquad
\sum_{k\in\Z_N} |\langle g_N , \tau_k L'' g_N \rangle_\beta|,
\qquad
\sum_{k\in\Z_N} |\langle u_N , j_{k,k+1}\rangle_\beta|,
\qquad
\sum_{k\in\Z_N} |\langle u_N , \tau_k L'' g_N\rangle_\beta|,$$ and that $$D \; := \; D (\beta) \; := \; \lim_{N\rightarrow \infty} \sum_{j\in \Z_N} (D_j)_N \; > \; 0.$$
Then, assuming that $X_0$ is distributed according to the equilibrium measure $\langle \cdot \rangle_\beta$, the finite dimensional distributions of the process $(Y_{N^2 t})_t$ converge weakly as $N\rightarrow \infty$ to the finite dimensional distributions of a process $(\mathrm Y_t)_t$ such that, for any smooth test function $H$, $$\mathrm Y_t (H) \; = \; \mathrm Y_0 (H_t) + M_t(H) + R_t(H),$$ where $H_t$ is given by . Here $\mathrm Y_0(H_t)$ is a Gaussian random variable with variance given by with $H_t$ in place of $H_0$, $M_t(H)$ is a centered Gaussian martingale, independent of $\mathrm Y_0 (H_t)$, which variance at time $t$ is given by $$\label{limit variance fluctuation field}
2\epsilon \int_0^t \bigg( \int_\T (\partial_x H_s)^2 \, \dd x \bigg) \, \dd s
\multiplication
\bigg(
\overline{\chi} \, \sigma^2(\beta)
-
\lim_{N\rightarrow \infty}\sum_{k\in\Z_N} \langle u_N, j_{k,k+1} \rangle_\beta +
\frac{\epsilon'}{\epsilon} \lim_{N\rightarrow \infty}\sum_{k\in\Z_N} \langle u_N,\tau_k L'' g_N \rangle_\beta
\bigg),$$ and $R_t(H)$ is centered with variance at time $t$ bounded by a constant times $$(\epsilon')^2 \epsilon^{-1} \multiplication (1 + t^2) \multiplication \lim_{k\in \Z_N}\sum_{k\in \Z_N} | \langle g_N, \tau_k L'' g_N \rangle_\beta |.$$
Diffusion of energy {#sec: Explicit results}
===================
The results below hold for our three models. We first obtain the hydrodynamic limit of the field $Y_{N^2 t}$ to the first order in $\epsilon$, with a bound on the variance of the rest term. As a direct corollary, we obtain a weak coupling limit, where $\epsilon$ is sent to zero after that the diffusive limit is taken.
\[the: first order\] Let $D = \overline{\chi}$. Let us assume that $X_0$ is distributed according to the equilibrium measure $\langle \cdot \rangle_\beta$. The finite dimensional distributions of the process $(Y_{N^2 t})_t$ converge weakly as $N\rightarrow \infty$ to the finite dimensional distributions of a process $(\mathrm Y_t)_t$ such that $$\mathrm Y_t (H) \; = \; \mathrm Y_0 (H_t) + M_t(H) + R_t(H),$$ where $H_t$ is given by , where $\mathrm Y_0(H_t)$ is a Gaussian random variable with variance given by with $H_t$ in place of $H_0$, where $M_t(H)$ is a Gaussian martingale, independent of $\mathrm Y_0(H_t)$, with variance $$2\epsilon D \sigma^2(\beta) \int_0^t \bigg( \int_\T (\partial_x H_s)^2 \, \dd x \bigg) \, \dd s + \mathcal O (\epsilon^2 t)
\qquad \text{(as} \; \; \epsilon \rightarrow 0,\; t\text{ fixed)},$$ and where $R_t(H)$ is centered with a variance that is $\mathcal O (\epsilon^{3} (1 + t^2))$ (as $\epsilon \rightarrow 0$, $t$ fixed).
Thanks to , there exists a function $v\in \L^2(\mathsf X, \langle \cdot \rangle_\beta)$, depending only on $x_0$ and $x_1$, that solves the Poisson equation $$- L' v \; = \; j_{0,1} - D \multiplication (e_0 - e_1) \; = \; ( \chi - \overline{\chi} )(r_0,r_1) \multiplication (e_0 - e_1),$$ and such that $\langle v | \mathbf e \rangle = 0$ for every $\mathbf e$. Defining $\epsilon' = \epsilon^2$, $u_N = \epsilon v$ and $g_N = -v$, one sees that the hypotheses of Proposition \[the: limit fluctuation field\] are satisfied, from which our claim follows. $\square$
\[cor: weak coupling limit\] Let $D = \overline{\chi}$. Let us assume that $X_0$ is distributed according to the equilibrium measure $\langle \cdot \rangle_\beta$. Letting first $N \rightarrow \infty$ and then $\epsilon \rightarrow 0$, the finite dimensional distributions of the process $(Y_{N^2 \epsilon^{-1}t})_t$ converge weakly to the finite dimensional distributions of the stationary Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process with diffusion constant $D$ and thermal capacity $\sigma^2 = \sigma^2 (\beta)$.
This follows directly from Theorem \[the: first order\] thanks to the bound in $\mathcal O (\epsilon^{3} (1 + t^2))$ on the variance of the rest term $R_t$. $\square$
Like in [@bri], we next approximate the internal dynamics of particles by a process independent of energy. So we now assume that, for $k \in \Z_N$, $$\label{independent internal dynamics}
L_k' u \; = \;
\varsigma_k\, \sqrt{\mathsf e_0} \multiplication \partial_{q_k} u
\, + \,
\sqrt{\mathsf e_0} \multiplication \big( u(\dots , - \varsigma_k, \dots) - u (\dots, \varsigma_k , \dots) \big).$$ With such a definition of $L'$, particles evolve now completely independently from each others. This in fact is not needed ; any operator $L'$, not involving energy and generating a dynamics that quickly relaxes to equilibrium independently of the system size $N$, should be fine for our purposes.
Let us see when the diffusion constant obtained with this new definition of $L'$ can be expected to be close to that of our original models. For this, let us introduce an extra small parameter $\delta > 0$ in the original models, by replacing everywhere the energy $\mathsf e_0 + e_k$ by a new, smaller energy, $\mathsf e_0 + e'_k = \mathsf e_0 + \delta e_k$. Doing so, the energy of a typical atom of the chain in the Gibbs state will be very close to the positive ground state energy $\mathsf e_0$, if $\delta$ is very small. So, for fixed $\epsilon >0$, we then expect the diffusion constant $\epsilon D = \epsilon D(\delta)$ to converge to the value given in theorem \[the: independent dynamics\] below, valid for any small enough $\epsilon > 0$, as $\delta \rightarrow 0$.
\[the: independent dynamics\] Assume that $L'_k$ is given by for $k\in \Z_N$, and that $\epsilon > 0$ is small enough. Assume also that $X_0$ is distributed according to the equilibrium measure $\langle \cdot \rangle_\beta$. As $N\rightarrow \infty$, the finite dimensional distributions of the field $(Y_{N^2 t})_t$ converge weakly to the finite dimensional distributions of a generalized Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process with some diffusion constant $\epsilon D >0$ independent of the temperature, and with the thermal capacity $\sigma^2 = \sigma^2 (\beta)$.
The proof is made of two steps: we first show that Proposition \[the: limit fluctuation field\] can be applied with $\epsilon' = 0$, and we next identify the variance of $M_t (H)$.
**Step 1.** Let $n \ge 1$. We show that the hypotheses of Proposition \[the: limit fluctuation field\] are satisfied with $\epsilon ' = \epsilon^{n+1}$, and that the limit as $N\rightarrow \infty$ of all the quantities appearing in the hypotheses of Proposition \[the: limit fluctuation field\], are bounded by a constant that does not depend on $n$. Let us introduce an extra definition. We say that a function $u$ on $\mathsf X$ is pre-gradient if it is of the form $$u ({{\mathbf{r}}}, {{\mathbf{e}}}) \; = \; \sum_{k\in \Z_N} \widehat{u} ({{\mathbf{r}}}, k) (e_k - e_{k+1}).$$
Let us first make two observations. Given a pre-gradient function $f$, the fundamental solution $u$ to the equation $-L' u = f$ is itself pregradient. Indeed the coefficients $\widehat{u}({{\mathbf{r}}}, k)$ are the fundamental solutions to the equation $-L' \widehat{u}({{\mathbf{r}}}, k) = \widehat{f}({{\mathbf{r}}},k)$. Second, if a function $u$ is pregradient, so is $L'' u$. Indeed, for the three models, one has $$\label{expression for L'' u for independent dynamics}
L'' u ({{\mathbf{r}}}, {{\mathbf{e}}}) \; = \;
\sum_{k\in \Z_N}
\big(
\widehat{u} ({{\mathbf{r}}}, k-1) - 2 \widehat{u} ({{\mathbf{r}}}, k) + \widehat{u} ({{\mathbf{r}}},k+1)
\big)
\, \chi (r_k , r_{k+1})
\, (e_k - e_{k+1}).$$ So moreover, if $u$ depends on variables $x_a, \dots , x_b$ with $a\le b$, then $L'' u$ depends on variables $x_{a-1} , \dots , x_{b+1}$.
Now, for $N$ large enough for given $n$, the functions $u_N$, $ (D \multiplication \nabla e)_N $ and $g_N$ that we will construct will actually not depend on $N$, so that we drop the index $N$. We set $$\label{recursive solution Poisson equation}
u \; = \; \sum_{k=1}^n \epsilon^k u^{(k)},
\qquad
(D \multiplication \nabla e) \; = \; \sum_{k=1}^n \epsilon^{k-1} \, D^{(k)} \multiplication \nabla e
\qquad \text{and} \qquad
g \;= \; - u^{(n)},$$ with the following recursive definitions of $u^{(k)}$ and $D^{(k)}$ for every $k \ge 1$. First $$D^{(1)} \multiplication \nabla e = \langle j_{0,1} | \mathbf e \rangle = \overline{\chi} \, (e_0 - e_1),$$ and $u^{(1)}$ is the fundamental solution of $$-L' u^{(1)} = j_{0,1} - \langle j_{0,1} | \mathbf e \rangle.$$ The function $u^{(1)}$ is pregradient. Next, given the pregradient function $u^{(k)}$ for $k \ge 1$, one takes $$D^{(k+1)}\multiplication \nabla e = \langle L'' u^{(k)} | {{\mathbf{e}}}\rangle_\beta$$ This indeed defines a linear gradient since $L'' u^{(k)}$ is pregradient. Then one defines $u^{(k+1)}$ to be the fundamental solution to $$-L' u^{(k+1)} = L'' u^{(k)} - \langle L'' u^{(k)} | {{\mathbf{e}}}\rangle_\beta.$$ The function $u^{(k+1)}$ is pregradient.
The functions $u$, $D\multiplication \nabla e$ and $g$ defined by satisfy $$\label{Poisson equation in proof}
- L u - \epsilon (j_{0,1} - D\multiplication \nabla e) \; = \; \epsilon^{n+1} L'' g.$$ Thanks to and the convergence of geometric series, the quantities appearing in the hypotheses of Proposition \[the: limit fluctuation field\] are then indeed bounded independently of $n$ if $\epsilon >0$ is taken small enough. Moreover, since $D^{(1)} = \overline{\chi} > 0$, it follows from that $D > 0$ if $\epsilon$ is small enough.
**Step 2.** Let $u$, $D\multiplication \nabla e$ and $g$ be given by Let us first give an expression for $D$. Since $\langle u | \mathbf e \rangle = 0$ for every $\mathbf e$, one has also $\langle L' u | \mathbf e \rangle = 0$ for every $\mathbf e$, so that, by , $$D\multiplication \nabla e
\; = \;
\overline{\chi} (e_0 - e_1) + \langle L'' u | \mathbf e \rangle + \epsilon^{n} \langle L'' g | \mathbf e \rangle.$$ The function $L'' u$ is computed by means of . Writing $D \multiplication \nabla e = \sum_{j\in\Z_N} D_j (e_j - e_{j+1})$, one has $$D
\; = \;
\sum_{j\in\Z_N} D_j
\; = \;
\overline{\chi} +
\sum_{k\in \Z_N} \big\langle \chi (\cdot) \big( \widehat{u} (\cdot , k-1) - 2 \widehat{u} (\cdot , k) + \widehat{u} (\cdot,k+1)\big) \big\rangle
+ \mathcal O (\epsilon^n).$$ Taking on the other hand the expression for the variance of $M_t(H)$, and using to compute $\lim_{N\rightarrow \infty}\sum_{k\in\Z_N} \langle u_N, j_{k,k+1} \rangle $, one gets $$\sigma^2 D \; = \; \sigma^2 \overline{\chi}
-
\lim_{N\rightarrow \infty}\sum_{k\in\Z_N} \langle u_N, j_{k,k+1} \rangle
+ \mathcal O(\epsilon^n).$$ This shows our claim. $\square$
Proof of Proposition \[the: limit fluctuation field\] {#sec: proof limit fluctuation field}
=====================================================
We first remind a general formula, that we will use several times. If $u = u(x,t)$ is a regular enough function on $\mathsf X \times \R_+$, then the process $$M_t \; = \; \int_0^t L u (X_s,s) \, \dd s + \int_0^t \partial_t u (X_s,s) \, \dd s + u(X_0,0) - u(X_t,t)$$ is a centered martingale, which variance at equilibrium is given by $$\Mean_\beta \big( M_t \big)^2
\; = \;
2 \int_0^t \langle u (\cdot ,s), (-L) u (\cdot, s) \rangle_\beta \, \dd s.$$ Let us then make some comments on the notations. We will write $\langle \cdot \rangle$ for $\langle \cdot \rangle_\beta$. For $k\in \Z_N$, we define the centered variables $$\eta_k \; = \; e_k - \langle e \rangle.$$ We will write gradient functions as $D\multiplication \nabla \eta$ instead of $D\multiplication \nabla e$. We will not write explicitly the dependence in $N$ of the functions $u_N$, $g_N$ and $(D\multiplication \nabla \eta)_N$ appearing in the hypotheses of Proposition \[the: limit fluctuation field\]. We will use the same symbol $\partial_x f$ for both the true derivative of $f$ and its approximative derivative $N\big( f(x+ 1/N) - f(x) \big)$.
Let $H = H(x)$ be the smooth test function, and let $G = G(x,s)$ be defined for $0 \le s \le N^2 t$, by $$\label{equation satisfied by G}
N^2 \partial_t G + \epsilon D \multiplication \partial_x^2 G = 0,
\qquad
G(\cdot, N^2 t) = H(\cdot).$$ Since $L \eta_k = \epsilon (j_{k-1,k} - j_{k,k+1})$ for $k\in\Z_N$, one has $$\int_0^{N^2 t} \frac{1}{\sqrt N} \sum_{k\in\Z_N} G(k/N,s) L \eta_k \, \dd s
\; = \;
\int_0^{N^2 t} \frac{1}{\sqrt N} \sum_{k\in\Z_N} G(k/N,s) \epsilon (j_{k-1,k} - j_{k,k+1}) \, \dd s$$ An integration by parts leads thus to $$\begin{aligned}
Y_{N^2 t} (G (\cdot,N^2 t)) - Y_0 (G (\cdot ,0))
\; = &\;
- M^{(0)}_{N^2 t}
+ \int_0^{N^2 t} \frac{1}{\sqrt N} \sum_{k\in\Z_N} \partial_t G(k/N,s) \eta_k\, \dd s\\
&\; + \frac{1}{N} \int_0^{N^2 t} \frac{1}{\sqrt N} \sum_{k\in \Z_N} \partial_x G(k/N,s) \epsilon j_{k,k+1} \, \dd s,\end{aligned}$$ where $M^{(0)}_{N^2 t}$ is a martingale. Using then the approximate fluctuation-dissipation decomposition of the current stated in the hypotheses of Proposition \[the: limit fluctuation field\], one gets $$\begin{aligned}
Y_{N^2 t} (G(\cdot,N^2 t)) - Y_0 (G(\cdot ,0))
\; = &\;
- M^{(0)}_{N^2 t}
+ \int_0^{N^2 t} \frac{1}{\sqrt N} \sum_{k\in\Z_N} \partial_t G(k/N,s) \eta_k\, \dd s
\label{proof term 1}\\
&\; - \frac{1}{N} \int_0^{N^2 t} \frac{L}{\sqrt N} \sum_{k\in \Z_N} \partial_x G(k/N,s) \tau_k u \, \dd s
\label{proof term 2}\\
&\; + \frac{\epsilon}{N} \int_0^{N^2 t} \frac{1}{\sqrt N} \sum_{k\in\Z_N} \partial_x G(k/N,s)\tau_k D\multiplication \nabla \eta \, \dd s
\label{proof term 3}\\
&\; - \frac{\epsilon'}{N}\int_0^{N^2 t} \frac{L''}{\sqrt N} \sum_{k\in \Z_N} \partial_x G(k/N,s) \tau_k g \, \dd s
\label{proof term 4}.\end{aligned}$$
We now proceed to the analysis of the last three terms in the right hand side of this equation. Let us start with . Since $\partial_t \partial_x H(k/N,s) = -(\epsilon D/N^2)\partial_x^3 H(k/N,s)$, there exists a martingale $M^{(1)}_{N^2 t}$ such that $$\begin{aligned}
\eqref{proof term 2}
\; = &\;
- M_{N^2 t}^{(1)}
- \frac{\epsilon D}{N^3}\int_0^{N^2 t} \frac{1}{\sqrt N} \sum_{k\in \Z_N} \partial_x^3 G(k/N,s) \, \tau_k u \, \dd s \\
&\; + \frac{1}{N}\frac{1}{\sqrt N}\sum_{k\in\Z_N} \partial_x G (k/N,N^2 t) \, \big( \tau_k u (X_0) - \tau_k u (X_{N^2 t}) \big)\\
=: &\; - M_{N^2 t}^{(1)} + \rho^{(0)}_{N^2 t}\end{aligned}$$ The hypothesis that $\sum_{k\in\Z_N} |\langle \tau_k u , u\rangle_\beta|$ remains bounded as $N\rightarrow \infty$, ensures that $\Mean (\rho^{(0)}_{N^2 t})^2 \rightarrow 0$ as $N\rightarrow \infty$. Let us then look at . Reminding that $D = \lim_{N\rightarrow \infty}\sum_{k\in\Z_N}D_k$, an integration by parts yields $$\begin{aligned}
\eqref{proof term 3}
\; = &\;
\frac{\epsilon D}{N^2} \int_0^{N^2 t} Y_s (\partial_x^2 G(\cdot, s)) \, \dd s\\
& \; +
\sum_{j} \frac{\epsilon D_j}{N^2} \int_0^{N^2 t} \frac{1}{\sqrt N} \sum_k \big( \partial_x^2 G(k/N,s) - \partial_x^2 G((k+j + 1)/N,s) \big) \eta_{k+j+1}\, \dd s \\
=: &\;
\frac{\epsilon D}{N^2} \int_0^{N^2 t} Y_s (\partial_x^2 H(\cdot, s)) \, \dd s + \rho^{(1)}_{N^2 t}.\end{aligned}$$
Let us show that $\Mean (\rho^{(1)}_{N^2 t})^2 \rightarrow 0$ as $N\rightarrow \infty$. First, by Jensen’s inequality, $$\Mean (\rho^{(1)}_{N^2 t})^2
\; \le \;
\frac{t^2}{N^2 t} \int_0^{N^2 t} \Mean \Big(
\sum_{j} \epsilon D_j \frac{1}{\sqrt N} \sum_k \big( \partial_x^2 G(k/N,s) - \partial_x^2 G((k+j + 1)/N,s) \big) \eta_{k+j+1} (s)
\Big)^2
\, \dd s.$$ At this point, we split the sum over $j$ as $$\sum_j (\dots) \; = \; \sum_{j:|j| \le \sqrt N} (\dots) \; + \; \sum_{j: |j| > \sqrt N} (\dots),$$ and we separately show that the variance of each of these terms, at a fixed time $s \in [0,N^2 t]$, converges to 0, which will establish that $\Mean (\rho^{(1)}_{N^2 t})^2 \rightarrow 0$. Since $\sum_{j\in\Z_N}|D_j|$ remains bounded as $N\rightarrow \infty$, it holds that $$\label{a variance somewhere in a proof...}
\Mean \Big(\sum_{j:|j| \le \sqrt N} (\dots)\Big)^2 \; \le \; \mathrm C \max_{j:|j|\le \sqrt N} \Mean (\dots)^2$$ for some constant $\mathrm C < + \infty$. But then $$\big| \partial_x^2 G(k/N,s) - \partial_x^2 G((k+j + 1)/N,s) \big| \; = \; \mathcal O (|j+1|/N) \; = \; \mathcal O (1/ \sqrt N),$$ so that the right hand side of is seen to converge to 0. For the second term, we have $$\Mean \Big( \sum_{j: |j| > \sqrt N} (\dots) \Big)^2 \; \le \;
\Big( \sum_{j: |j|\ge \sqrt N} D_j\Big)^2
\Mean \Big( \frac{\epsilon}{\sqrt N} \sum_k \big( \partial_x^2 G(k/N,s) - \partial_x^2 G((k+j + 1)/N,s) \big) \eta_{k+j+1} (s) \Big)^2.$$ We remind that, in this expression, $D_j$ is written for $(D_j)_N$. Since, by hypothesis, both $(D_j)_N$ and $\sum_{l\in\Z_N}|D_l|$ converge as $N\rightarrow \infty$, for any given $j\in \Z_N$, we conclude that the first factor in the right hand side of this inequality converges to 0 as $N\rightarrow \infty$. Since the second factor stays bounded as $N\rightarrow \infty$, we deduce that the left hand side converges to 0 as $N\rightarrow \infty$.
We finally handle the less usual term , which is a centered process. It is convenient to define $$F_s \; = \; \frac{1}{\sqrt N}\sum_{k\in\Z_N} \partial_x G(k/N,s) \, \tau_k g,
\qquad
\tilde F_s \; = \; \frac{1}{\sqrt N}\sum_{k\in\Z_N} \partial^3_x G(k/N,s) \, \tau_k g$$ For $z>0$ one then defines $V_{z,s}$ and $\tilde V_{z,s}$ as respective unique solutions to the equations $$\label{Poisson equation with z}
(z-L) V_{z,s} \; = \; - L'' F_s,
\qquad
(z-L) \tilde V_{z,s} \; = \; - L'' \tilde F_s.$$ So, defining a centered martingale $M^{(2)}_{N^2 t}$, one has $$\begin{aligned}
\eqref{proof term 4}
\; = &\;
\epsilon' \frac{1}{N} \int_0^{N^2 t} (-L'') G_s (X_s) \, \dd s \\
\; = &\;
\frac{\epsilon' z}{N} \int_0^{N^2 t} V_{z,s} (X_s) \, \dd s
- \frac{\epsilon'}{N} \int_0^{N^2} L V_{z,s}(X_s) \, \dd s\\
\; = &\;
\frac{\epsilon' z}{N} \int_0^{N^2 t} V_{z,s} (X_s) \, \dd s
+ \frac{\epsilon'}{N} \int_0^{N^2 t} \partial_t V_{z,s} (X_s) \, \dd s
- \frac{\epsilon'}{N} M_{N^2 t}^{(2)} + \frac{\epsilon'}{N} \big( V_{z,0}(X_0) - V_{z,N^2 t}(X_{N^2 t}) \big)\end{aligned}$$ Therefore, taking $z = 1/N^2$, one finds a constant $\mathrm C < +\infty$ such that $$\begin{aligned}
\Mean_\beta \big(\eqref{proof term 4}^2 \big)
\; \le &\;\mathrm C\,(\epsilon')^{2}
\bigg(
t^2 \multiplication \frac{1}{N^2 t}\int_0^{N^2 t} z \langle V_{z,s}^2 \rangle \, \dd s + t^2 \multiplication \frac{1}{N^2 t}\int_0^{N^2 t} z \langle \tilde V_{z,s}^2 \rangle \, \dd s \\
&\; +
t \multiplication \frac{1}{N^2 t}\int_0^{N^2 t} \langle V_{z,s}, (-L) V_{z,s} \rangle \, \dd s
+ z \langle V_{z,0}^2 \rangle + z \langle V_{z,N^2 t}^2 \rangle
\bigg).\end{aligned}$$ But one has the bounds $$\label{proof a bound}
z \langle V_{z,s}^2 \rangle \; \le \; \epsilon^{-1} \langle F_s , (-L'')F_s \rangle,
\qquad
\langle V_{z,s}, (-L)V_{z,s} \rangle \; \le \; \epsilon^{-1} \langle F_s , (-L'')F_s \rangle,$$ as well as the same bounds with the tilted quantities. Indeed, implies $$\begin{aligned}
z \langle V_{z,s}^2 \rangle + \langle V_{z,s} \multiplication (-L) V_{z,s} \rangle
\; = &\;
\langle V_{z,s} \multiplication (-L'') F_s \rangle
\; \le \;
\langle F_s \multiplication (-L'') F_s \rangle^{1/2} \langle V_{z,s} \multiplication (-L'') V_{z,s} \rangle^{1/2} \\
\; \le &\;
\epsilon^{-1/2}\, \langle F_s \multiplication (-L'') F_s \rangle^{1/2} \langle V_{z,s} \multiplication (-\epsilon \, L'') V_{z,s} \rangle^{1/2} \\
\; \le &\;
\epsilon^{-1/2}\, \langle F_s \multiplication (-L'') F_s \rangle^{1/2} \langle V_{z,s} \multiplication (-L) V_{z,s} \rangle^{1/2},\end{aligned}$$ from where is derived. So finally we obtain $$\label{bound on the variance of R}
\Mean_\beta \big(\eqref{proof term 4}^2 \big)
\; \le \;
\mathrm C \,(\epsilon')^2 \epsilon^{-1} (1+ t^2) \lim_{N\rightarrow \infty}\sum_{k\in\Z_N} |\langle g, L'' \tau_k g \rangle_\beta|.$$
So at this point, let us define $$R_{N^2 t} \; = \; \eqref{proof term 4}
\qquad \text{and} \qquad
M_{N^2 t} \; = \; - M_{N^2 t}^{(0)} - M_{N^2 t}^{(1)}.$$ Taking into account that $G$ satisfies , one has so far obtained $$Y_{N^2 t} (H)
\; = \;
Y_0(G(\cdot ,0)) + M_{N^2 t} + R_{N^2 t} + \rho_{N^2 t}^{(0)} + \rho^{(1)}_{N^2 t}.$$ It holds that $G(\cdot , 0) = H_t (\cdot)$, that $\Mean_\beta (R^2_{N^2 t})$ is bounded by and that both $\rho_{N^2 t}^{(0)}$ and $\rho_{N^2 t}^{(1)}$ converge to 0 in $\Lp^2(\Proba_\beta)$. Therefore, if we establish that $$\begin{gathered}
\lim_{N\rightarrow \infty}\Mean_{\beta} ( M_{N^2 t}^2 )
\; = \; \\
2\epsilon
\lim_{N\rightarrow \infty}
\frac{1}{N^2}\int_0^{N^2 t}\hspace{-0.1cm}\bigg( \int (\partial_x G)^2 (x,s) \, \dd x \bigg) \dd s
\multiplication
\Big(
\overline{\chi}\sigma^2
-
\sum_{k\in\Z_N} \langle u , j_{k,k+1} \rangle
+
\frac{\epsilon'}{\epsilon}
\sum_{k\in \Z_N} \langle u, \tau_k L''g \rangle
\Big),
\label{convergence of the variance}\end{gathered}$$ then we will be able to conclude that $ M_{N^2 t}$ converges as a process to a centered Gaussian martingale, independent of $Y_0(H_t)$, with the variance given by (see [@kom] or also [@her]). It thus remains to show to conclude the proof.
Writing $Y_s$ for $Y_s (H(\cdot , s))$ and putting $$U_s \; = \; \frac{1}{N}\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}} \sum_{k\in\Z_N} \partial_x H (k/N,s) \tau_k u ,$$ the variance of $M_{N^2 t}$ is given by $$\begin{aligned}
\Mean (M_{N^2 t})^2
\; = &\; 2 \int_0^{N^2 t} \langle Y_s + U_s , (-L) (Y_s + U_s) \rangle \, \dd s \\
\; = &\;
2\epsilon \int_0^{N^2 t} \langle Y_s , (-L'')Y_s \rangle \, \dd s
+ 4 \epsilon \int_0^{N^2 t} \langle U_s, (-L'') Y_s \rangle \, \dd s
+ 2 \int_0^{N^2 t} \langle U_s , (-L)U_s \rangle \, \dd s.\end{aligned}$$ One first readily computes that, since $\sum_{k\in\Z_N}|\langle u , j_{k,k+1}\rangle|$ remains bounded as $N\rightarrow \infty$, $$\begin{aligned}
2\epsilon \int_0^{N^2 t} \langle Y_s , (-L'')Y_s \rangle \, \dd s
\; \rightarrow \; &
2 \epsilon \overline{\chi} \sigma^2 \multiplication \lim_{N\rightarrow \infty}\frac{1}{N^2}\int_0^{N^2 t}\bigg( \int (\partial_x G)^2 (x,s) \, \dd x \bigg)\, \dd s,\\
4 \epsilon \int_0^{N^2 t} \langle U_s, (-L'') Y_s \rangle \, \dd s
\; \rightarrow \;&
- 4 \epsilon \lim_{N\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{N^2} \int_0^{N^2t } \bigg( \int (\partial_x G)^2 (x,s) \, \dd x\bigg) \, \dd s
\multiplication \sum_{k\in\Z_N} \langle u , j_{k,k+1} \rangle.\end{aligned}$$ Then, one uses the approximate fluctuation-dissipation decomposition of the current stated as hypothesis in Proposition \[the: limit fluctuation field\] to obtain $$-L U_s
\; = \;
\frac{\epsilon}{N^{3/2}} \sum_{k\in\Z_N} \partial_x G (k/N,s) j_{k,k+1} -
\frac{\epsilon}{N^{3/2}} \sum_{k\in\Z_N} \partial_x G (k/N,s) \,\tau_k D\multiplication \nabla \eta
+ \frac{\epsilon'}{N^{3/2}} \sum_{k\in\Z_N} \partial_x G(k/N,s)\, \tau_k L'' g.$$ The second term in the right hand side of this equation will not contribute since it is a gradient. Taking into account that both $\sum_{k\in\Z_N}|\langle u , j_{k,k+1}\rangle|$ and $\sum_{k\in\Z_N}|\langle u , \tau_k L'' g\rangle|$ remain bounded as $N\rightarrow \infty$, a computation furnishes $$2 \int_0^{N^2 t} \langle U_s , (-L)U_s \rangle \, \dd s
\; \rightarrow \;
2 \lim_{N\rightarrow \infty}\frac{1}{N^2} \int_0^{N^2 t} \bigg( \int (\partial_x G)^2 (x,s) \dd x \bigg) \, \dd s
\multiplication
\Big(
\epsilon \sum_{k\in\Z_N} \langle u , j_{k,k+1} \rangle + \epsilon' \sum_{k\in \Z_N} \langle u, \tau_k L'' g \rangle
\Big).$$ So is shown. $\square$
**Acknowledgements.** I am grateful to L.-S. Young for her kind invitation at the Courant Institute, where this work initiated ; I am indebted to her for the time she shared with me discussing many ideas related to this manuscript. It is also a pleasure for me to thank S. Olla, F. Simenhaus and G. Stoltz for illuminating discussions. I thank the European Advanced Grant Macroscopic Laws and Dynamical Systems (MALADY) (ERC AdG 246953) for financial support.
[99]{}
K. Aoki, J. Lukkarinen, H. Spohn, Energy Transport in Weakly Anharmonic Chains, Journal of Statistical Physics, 124 (5), 1105-1129, 2006.
C. Bernardin, Hydrodynamics for a system of harmonic oscillators perturbed by a conservative noise, Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 117 (4), 487-513, 2007.
F. Bonetto, J.L. Lebowitz, L. Rey-Bellet, Fourier’s law: a challenge to theorists, pp. 128-150 in Mathematical Physics 2000, Imperial College Press, London, 2000.
J. Bricmont, A. Kupiainen, Diffusion in Energy Conserving Coupled Maps, arXiv:1102.3831, 1-53, 2011.
D. Dolgopyat, C. Liverani, Energy Transfer in a Fast-Slow Hamiltonian System, Communications in Mathematical Physics, 308 (1), 201-225, 2011.
J. Dolbeault, C. Mouhot, C. Schmeiser, Hypocoercivity for linear kinetic equations conserving mass, arXiv:1005.1495, 1-21, 2010.
J.-P. Eckmann, L.-S. Young, Nonequilibrium energy profiles for a class of 1-D models, Communications in Mathematical Physics, 262 (1), 237-267, 2006.
J. Fritz, K. Nagy, S.Olla, Equilibrium Fluctuations for a System of Harmonic Oscillators with Conservative Noise, Journal of Statistical Physics, 122 (3), 399-415, 2006.
P. Gaspard, T. Gilbert, Heat conduction and Fourier’s law by consecutive local mixing and thermalization, Physical Review Letters, **101** (2), 020601, 4 pages, 2008.
F. Hernandez, Equilibrium fluctuations for a nongradient energy conserving stochastic model, arXiv:1006.5861, 1-41, 2010.
C. Kipnis, C. Landim, Scaling Limits of Interacting Particle Systems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999.
C. Kipnis, C. Marchioro, E. Presutti, Heat Flow in an Exactly Solvable Model, Journal of Statistical Physics, **27** (1), 65-74, 1982.
F. Huveneers, Energy transport through rare collisions, Journal of Statistical Physics, 146 (1), 73-97, 2011.
T. Komorowski, C. Landim, S. Olla, Fluctuations in Markov Processes, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften 345, Springer, 2012.
J. Lukkarinen, H. Spohn, Anomalous energy transport in the FPU-beta chain, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 61 (12), 1753-1786, 2008.
C. Liverani and S. Olla, Toward the Fourier law for a weakly interacting anharmonic crystal, Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 25 (2), 555-583, 2012.
S. Olla, M. Sasada, Macroscopic energy diffusion for a chain of anharmonic oscillators, Probability Theory and Related Fields, Online First, DOI 10.1007/s00440-012-0469-5, 1-55, 2012.
[^1]: CEREMADE, Universit' e de Paris-Dauphine, Place du Maréchal De Lattre De Tassigny, 75775 PARIS CEDEX 16 - FRANCE. E-mail: [email protected]. Supported by the European Advanced Grant Macroscopic Laws and Dynamical Systems (MALADY) (ERC AdG 246953)
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'Bae and Park found an upper bound on the arc index of prime links in terms of the minimal crossing number. In this paper, we extend the definition of the arc presentation to spatial graphs and find an upper bound on the arc index $\alpha (G)$ of any spatial graph $G$ as $$\alpha(G) \leq c(G)+e+b,$$ where $c(G)$ is the minimal crossing number of $G$, $e$ is the number of edges, and $b$ is the number of bouquet cut-components. This upper bound is lowest possible.'
address:
- 'Department of Mathematics, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea'
- 'Department of Statistics, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea '
- 'Department of Mathematics, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea'
author:
- Minjung Lee
- Sungjong No
- Seungsang Oh
title: Arc index of spatial graphs
---
[^1] [^2] [^3]
Introduction {#sec:intro}
============
A graph is a set of vertices connected by edges allowing loops and multiple edges. A graph embedded in $\mathbb{R}^3$ is called a [*spatial graph*]{}. We consider two spatial graphs to be the same if they are equivalent under ambient isotopy. Specifically a spatial graph which consists of one vertex and nonempty loops is called a [*bouquet*]{}. Note that a knot is a spatial graph consisting of a vertex and a loop, and a link is a disjoint union of knots.
There is an open-book decomposition of $\mathbb{R}^3$ which has open half-planes as pages and the standard $z$-axis as the binding axis. Every link $L$ can be embedded in an open-book decomposition with finitely many pages so that it meets each page in exactly one simple arc with two different end-points on the binding axis. Such an embedding is called an [*arc presentation*]{} of $L$.
Birman and Menasco [@BM] used the idea of arc presentations to find braid presentations for reverse-string satellites. Cromwell [@Cr] used the term arc index $\alpha(L)$ to denote the minimum number of arcs to make an arc presentation of a link $L$. Later, Cromwell and Nutt [@CN] conjectured the following upper bound on the arc index in terms of the minimal crossing number which was proved by Bae and Park [@BP]. Note that Jin and Park [@JP] improved the result for non-alternating links.
\[Bae-Park\] \[thm:bp\] Let $L$ be any prime link. Then $\alpha(L) \leq c(L)+2$. Moreover this inequality is strict if and only if $L$ is not alternating.
In this paper, we extend the definition of arc presentation to spatial graphs. An [*arc presentation*]{} of a spatial graph $G$ is defined in the same manner as an arc presentation of a link. In this case the binding axis contains all vertices of $G$ and finitely many points from the interiors of edges of $G$, and each edge of $G$ may pass from one page to another across the binding axis. The $m$ points on the binding axis are numbered in order $1, 2, \dots, m$.
As a family of simple spatial graphs, a [*$\theta_p$-curve*]{} ($p \! \geq \! 3$) is a spatial graph which consists two vertices and $p$ edges connecting them. In particular a $\theta_3$-curve is a $\theta$-curve. Figure \[fig:arcpresentation\] shows an arc presentation of the $\theta$-curve $5_1$ which is listed in [@Mo]. The [*arc index*]{} $\alpha(G)$ is defined to be the minimal number of pages among all possible arc presentations of $G$.
![Arc presentation of the $\theta$-curve $5_1$[]{data-label="fig:arcpresentation"}](fig1.eps)
We consider two types of 2-spheres that separate $G$ into two parts. Such a 2-sphere is called a splitting-sphere if it does not meet $G$, and a cut-sphere if it intersects $G$ in a single vertex, which is called a cut vertex. We maximally decompose $G$ into [*cut-components*]{} by cutting $G$ along a maximal set $\mathcal{S}$ of splitting-spheres and cut-spheres where any two spheres are either disjoint or intersect each other in exactly one cut vertex. In particular, if such a cut-component is itself a bouquet spatial graph, we call it a [*bouquet cut-component*]{}.
As in knot theory, the crossing number $c(G)$ of the spatial graph $G$ is the minimal number of double points in any generic projection of $G$ into the plane $\mathbb{R}^2 \subset \mathbb{R}^3$. Note that these double points must be away from the projected vertices of $G$.
The purpose of this paper is to verify the spatial graph version of Theorem \[thm:bp\].
\[thm:main\] Let $G$ be any spatial graph with $e$ edges and $b$ bouquet cut-components. Then $$\alpha(G) \leq c(G)+e+b.$$ Furthermore, this is the lowest possible upper bound.
We remark that this theorem induces Bae and Park’s upper bound for a knot or a non-splittable 2-component link, by applying that it consists of exactly one edge (and so is itself a bouquet cut-component) or two edges (without a bouquet cut-component), respectively.
Graph-spoke diagram {#sec:graphspoke}
===================
Let $G$ be a spatial graph. Consider an arc-presentation of $G$ with $n$ pages whose binding is the $z$-axis. We project this arc-presentation onto the $xy$-plane to get a wheel with $n$ spokes. Then the central point of the wheel corresponds to the binding axis and each spoke corresponds to an arc on a page. Assign the pair of numbers $\{i, j\}$ to each spoke so that the corresponding arc connects the two different points numbered $i$ and $j$ on the binding. The result is called a [*spoke diagram*]{} of $G$. See Figure \[fig:spokediagram\]. Conversely, if $G$ admits a spoke diagram with $n$ spokes, then it also admits an arc-presentation into an open-book with $n$ pages.
![Spoke diagram of the arc presentation of $5_1$ in Figure \[fig:arcpresentation\][]{data-label="fig:spokediagram"}](fig2.eps)
Let $D_0$ be a regular graph diagram of $G$ with vertices and under/over crossings. In Section \[sec:spoking\], we will convert $D_0$ to its spoke diagram by means of an algorithm which we will call the [*spoking*]{} algorithm. Roughly speaking, we select a vertex $v_0$ of $D_0$, not a crossing, and consider the vertical line through $v_0$ as the binding for the desired arc presentation. We call $v_0$ the [*pivot*]{} vertex. Intermediate stages involve moves of the spatial graph which increase the number of the strands crossing the vertical line, while reducing the number of crossings and vertices, other than $v_0$. Then, the intermediate diagram consists of a regular graph diagram except near $v_0$ and spokes incident to $v_0$. The end of each edge incident to $v_0$ is labeled by a number to indicate the corresponding level at which it meets the vertical line. A spoke which represents an arc on a page is labeled by two different numbers to show the levels of both end-points of the arc. This intermediate diagram is called a [*graph-spoke diagram*]{} of $G$. Figure \[fig:graphspoke\] shows how a graph-spoke diagram is related to the original spatial graph.
![Graph-spoke diagram and the related spatial graph[]{data-label="fig:graphspoke"}](fig3.eps)
A plane graph means a graph embedded into $\mathbb{R}^2$. In a plane graph, a loop is said to be innermost if at least one of its two complementary regions does not meet the graph. A vertex is called a cut vertex if the plane graph can be split into more components by cutting at the vertex. Now, consider a graph-spoke diagram $D$. Let $\overline{D}$ denote the plane graph obtained by identifying under and over crossings of $D$, called the [*underlying graph*]{}. A loop of $D$ based at the pivot vertex $v_0$ is called [*innermost*]{} if it is an innermost loop in the underlying graph $\overline{D}$. A graph-spoke diagram is called [*cut-point free*]{} if its underlying graph after deleting all spokes has no cut vertex.
Spoking algorithm {#sec:spoking}
=================
Any spatial graph can be converted to a spoke diagram by means of the following algorithmic construction which is called the [*spoking algorithm*]{}. This algorithm mainly follows the main argument in Bae and Park’s paper [@BP] with modification to spatial graphs.
Let $G$ be a spatial graph and $D_0$ be a regular graph diagram of $G$. Select a [*pivot*]{} vertex $v_0$ of $D_0$, not a crossing, which will eventually represent the binding. We now construct a sequence, in the spoking algorithm, $$D_0 \rightarrow D_1 \rightarrow D_2 \rightarrow \cdots \rightarrow D_n$$ of graph-spoke diagrams so that the last $D_n$ is the desired spoke diagram for an arc presentation of $G$. Here, $D_0$ is indeed a graph-spoke diagram having no spoke, and all edges of $D_0$ near $v_0$ must be labeled by the same level, say $1$.
An intermediate graph-spoke diagram $D_m$ with its underlying graph $\overline{D}_m$ is given. Select an edge $e$ of $\overline{D}_m$ joining $v_0$ (with level $i$ in $D_m$) and $v$ which was either a crossing or a vertex of $D_m$. We call $e$ a [*pulling*]{} edge. We will construct a new graph-spoke diagram $D_{m+1}$ in three different ways according to the following three types;
- (Type 1) The vertex $v$ comes from a crossing of $D_m$.
- (Type 2) The vertex $v$ comes from a vertex of $D_m$ which is not $v_0$.
- (Type 3) The pulling edge $e$ is a loop, i.e., $v = v_0$.
We need to make sure that for each type the spatial graph representing $D_{m+1}$ remains the same as that of $D_m$.
For Type 1, we move a small portion of $D_m$ near $v$ along the edge $e$ as illustrated in Figure \[fig:type1\]. The other three edges of $\overline{D}_m$ incident to $v$ clockwise from $e$ are denoted by $e'_1$, $e'$ and $e'_2$. Assume that the strand of $D_m$ corresponding to $e'_1 \cup e'_2$ over-crosses (resp. under-crosses) the strand corresponding to $e \cup e'$. We contract the edge $e$ and move the other three edges near $v$ along $e$. Then, assign the same level $i$ to $e'$ near $v_0$, and to $e'_1$ and $e'_2$ a number $k$ which is larger (resp. smaller) than any current assigned numbers near $v_0$ so that these moved edges $e'_1$ and $e'_2$ are incident to the binding at a level above (resp. below) any of the current spokes or edges meeting $v_0$. The result is a new graph-spoke diagram, say $D'$.
If $e'_1$, similarly for $e'_2$, in $D'$ is a loop based at $v_0$ as in the second part of Figure \[fig:type1\], we can slide $e'_1$ all the way above (resp. below) the portion of $D'$ in the inside region of $e'_1$ without changing the spatial graph type. This is because the half portion of $e'_1$ meeting the binding at level $k$ can be viewed as lying above (resp. below) all the rest of the graph. This movement is called [*sliding*]{}, and the resulting graph-spoke diagram has the new innermost loop $e'_1$.
Now we replace $e'_1$ by a spoke labeled by $\{j, k\}$ where $j$ is the level of $e'_1$ at the other end. This procedure is called [*spoking*]{}, and the resulting graph-spoke diagram is denoted by $D_{m+1}$.
![Type 1[]{data-label="fig:type1"}](fig4.eps)
For Type 2, we similarly move a portion of $D_m$ along the edge $e$ as illustrated in Figure \[fig:type2\]. The other edges of $\overline{D}_m$ incident to $v$ clockwise from $e$ are denoted by $e_1, \dots, e_p$. We move the vertex $v$ to $v_0$ along the edge $e$ so that the edges $e, e_1, \dots, e_p$ are incident to $v_0$, and assign to the newly attached end-points of these edges to $v_0$ a number $k$ which is larger than any current assigned numbers near $v_0$. Note that some of them are loops based at $v_0$, and these loops can be made innermost by sliding, and become spokes by spoking as in Type 1. $D_{m+1}$ denotes the resulting graph-spoke diagram.
![Type 2[]{data-label="fig:type2"}](fig5.eps)
For Type 3, we simply move the edge $e$ as illustrated in Figure \[fig:type3\] so that a middle point in $e$ goes to $v_0$. In this case we get two loops based at $v_0$, and similarly assign to the newly attached end-points of both loops to $v_0$ a number $k$ which is larger than any current assigned numbers near $v_0$. Both loops can be made innermost by sliding, and become two spokes by spoking. $D_{m+1}$ denotes the resulting graph-spoke diagram.
![Type 3[]{data-label="fig:type3"}](fig6.eps)
We repeat this procedure until there are no edges, but all spokes. Then, the resulting graph-spoke diagram $D_n$ is indeed a spoke diagram. Note that we need to re-assign level $i$’s by $1,2,\dots$ in the order of their heights.
\[prop:unchanged\] Suppose that $D_m$ and $D_{m+1}$ are graph-spoke diagrams successively appearing in the spoking algorithm. Then the sum of the numbers of spokes, regions and vertices of $D_{m+1}$ is the same as that of $D_m$ for the Type 1 and 2 cases, while greater by 1 for the Type 3 case.
Here, the regions of a graph-spoke diagram mean the regions of its underlying plane graph.
For the Type 1 case, moving the crossing $v$ to the pivot vertex $v_0$ changes nothing of the numbers of spokes, regions and vertices. For the Type 2 case, moving the vertex $v$ to $v_0$ erases one vertex $v$ and creates one region bounded by $e$. For the Type 3 case, moving the middle point of the pulling edge $e$ to $v_0$ only creates one more extra region.
Furthermore, in all cases, sliding does not change the numbers of spokes, regions and vertices, while spoking erases some regions and creates the same number of spokes.
Proof of Theorem \[thm:main\] {#sec:proof}
=============================
In this section, we prove the main theorem.
Let $G$ be a given spatial graph with the cut-component decomposition $G_1 \cup \cdots \cup G_t$. Suppose that each $G_s$, $s=1,\dots,t$, consists of $e(G_s)$ edges so that the total number of edges of $G$ is $e=\sum_{s=1}^t e(G_s)$. Note that $c(G) = \sum_{s=1}^t c(G_s)$. Let $b$ denote the number of bouquet cut-components among $G_s$’s.
Now consider a cut-component $G_s$ and its reduced regular graph diagram $D_0$ with $c(G_s)$ crossings. As in knot theory, a diagram is called reduced if it does not have a nugatory crossing (which separates the projection into two disjoint parts). Obviously $D_0$ is cut-point free. Select one pivot vertex $v_0$ of $D_0$. We now build a special sequence of the spoking algorithm $$\label{eq1}
D_0 \rightarrow D_1 \rightarrow D_2 \rightarrow \cdots \rightarrow D_n \tag{$\ast$}$$ so that every intermediate graph-spoke diagram $D_m$ is cut-point free. The following claim which is a generalization of [@BP Lemma 1] to spatial graphs is crucial in the proof. Note that, in the original lemma, they assumed that the underlying graph has only 4-valent vertices except the pivot vertex due to the property of link diagrams. $D_m$ is called a [*bouquet diagram*]{} if $D_m$, after ignoring all spokes, is a diagram of a bouquet graph.
\[claim:cutpointfree\] Suppose that $D_m$ is cut-point free. Then we can always choose a pulling edge $e$ in its underlying graph $\overline{D}_m$ incident to $v_0$ so that $D_{m+1}$ as in the next step in the spoking algorithm is also cut-point free and furthermore, if $D_m$ is not a bouquet diagram, $D_{m+1}$ is not a bouquet diagram.
Suppose that $D_m$, denoted by $D$ for simplicity, is cut-point free. Select an edge $e_1=v_0 v_1$ of $\overline{D}$. Let $D_{e_1}$ be the next graph-spoke diagram obtained from $D$ by applying one step of the spoking algorithm along the pulling edge $e_1$. If $\overline{D}$ contains a loop based at $v_0$, it must consist of one loop $e_1$ and spokes only since $D$ is cut-point free. By proceeding with the Type 3 move along $e_1$, $D_{e_1}$ is indeed the final spoke diagram $D_n$, so we are done.
We now assume that $\overline{D}$ contains no loops, so $v_0 \neq v_1$. Suppose that $D_{e_1}$ is not cut-point free. In the underlying graph $\overline{D}_{e_1}$ after deleting all spokes, $v_0$ must become a cut vertex. By a suitable choice of the unbounded region $R_1$ of $\overline{D}_{e_1}$, we have the right picture of Figure \[fig:cutpoint\] where $R_1$ splits $\overline{D}_{e_1}$ into two portions without loops as drawn in shaded areas. Note that, if one portion contains a loop of $\overline{D}_{e_1}$, then this loop comes from a loop based at either $v_0$ or $v_1$ in $\overline{D}$, a contradiction to the fact that $D$ is cut-point free. Now we may say that the shape of $\overline{D}$ near $e_1$ looks like the left picture. In $\overline{D}$, after ignoring all spokes, let $e_2, \dots, e_d$ denote the edges incident to $v_0$ appeared in clockwise next to $e_1$. Eventually, in $D_{e_1}$, $v_1$ moves to $v_0$ along $e_1$, $e_1$ disappears or becomes a spoke depending on whether $v_1$ comes from a crossing or a vertex of $D$, and edges incident to $v_1$ among $e_2, \dots, e_d$ become spokes.
![Non cut-point free case of $D_{e_1}$[]{data-label="fig:cutpoint"}](fig7.eps)
Now we consider the dual graph $\overline{D}^*$ of $\overline{D}$ after ignoring all spokes. For a vertex $w$ of $\overline{D}$, let $w^*$ denote the region of the dual graph $\overline{D}^*$ corresponding to $w$. Suppose that the boundary cycle of $v_0^*$ is $\partial v_0^* = e_1^* e_2^* \cdots e_d^*$, where each $e_i^*$ denotes the edge of $\overline{D}^*$ corresponding to $e_i$ as in Figure \[fig:dual\]. Notice that the boundary cycles $\partial v_0^*$ and $\partial v_1^*$ are simple closed curves because neither $v_0$ nor $v_1$ is a cut vertex, and share the dual edge $e_1^*$, the dual vertex $R_1^*$ of the unbounded region $R_1$, and also all dual edges $e_t^*$’s where $e_t$’s are incident to $v_1$ as in the figure. Since $\partial v_0^*$ is simple, there are only two consecutive edges $e_k^*$ and $e_{k+1}^*$ linked at $R_1^*$. Then $2 \leq k \leq d \! - \! 1$ since otherwise $v_1$ is a cut vertex of $\overline{D}$.
![Dual graph $\overline{D}^*$[]{data-label="fig:dual"}](fig8.eps)
Suppose that the graph-spoke diagram $D_{e_2}$ obtained from $D$ by using another pulling edge $e_2=v_0 v_2$ is not cut-point free. By the same argument as above, another unbounded region $R_2$ of $\overline{D}_{e_2}$ can be suitably chosen so that $\partial v_0^*$ and a simple closed curve $\partial v_2^*$ in $\overline{D}^*$ share $e_2^*$ and $R_2^*$ with two consecutive edges $e_{k'}^*$ and $e_{k'+1}^*$ on $\partial v_0^*$ linked at $R_2^*$ for some $k' = 3, \dots, k$.
If all $D_{e_1}, \dots, D_{e_i}$, $i=1,\dots,k$, are not cut-point free, then the inductively chosen vertex $R_i^*$ on $\partial v_0^*$ is the common vertex of two consecutive edges $e_{k''}^*$ and $e_{k''+1}^*$ with $i < k'' \leq k$. This implies that $i < k$, so at least one, say $D_{e_j}$, of $D_{e_1}, \dots, D_{e_k}$ is cut-point free. The resulting graph-spoke diagram $D_{e_j}$ is $D_{m+1}$ as we desired.
Furthermore, suppose that $D$ is not a bouquet diagram. Thus $D$ has a vertex $v$ other than $v_0$. If all edges of $\overline{D}$ incident to $v_0$ are also incident to $v$, then $D$, after ignoring all spokes, is indeed the trivial diagram of a $\theta_p$-curve (so this diagram has no crossings) since $D$ is cut-point free. By proceeding with a Type 2 move along any edge $e$, $D_{e}$ is indeed the final spoke diagram $D_n$ which is not a bouquet diagram.
If there is an edge $e'$ of $\overline{D}$ incident to $v_0$ and away from $v$, we apply the same argument as before by considering $e'$ as $e_1$. As a result, we find an edge $e''$ (which is $e_j$ in the previous argument) so that the graph-spoke diagram $D_{e''}$ is cut-point free. In particular, if $v$ lies in the left shaded area of $\overline{D}$ in Figure \[fig:cutpoint\], then we find $e''$ lying on the right shaded area, or vice versa. Therefore $D_{e''}$ still has $v$ as a vertex so that it is not a bouquet diagram.
This claim guarantees that all intermediate $D_m$’s in the sequence are cut-point free by suitably choosing a pulling edge at each step. Let $v(G_s)$ denote the number of vertices of $G_s$ (or $D_0$), and $r(D_0)$ the number of regions of $D_0$ (or $\overline{D}_0$).
We separate into two cases as to whether the cut-component $G_s$ is a bouquet or not. Suppose that $G_s$ is not a bouquet. Then we further assume that all $D_m$’s are not bouquet diagrams. This implies that each step in this spoking algorithm is related to a Type 1 or 2 move only. We remark that the last step is a Type 2 move on $D_{n-1}$ which is a trivial diagram of a $\theta_p$-curve with spokes as in the last paragraph in the proof of Claim \[claim:cutpointfree\]. Proposition \[prop:unchanged\] says that all $D_m$’s have the same value of the sum of the numbers of their spokes, regions and vertices. Therefore the number of spokes of the final spoke diagram $D_n$ is $v(G_s) + r(D_0) - 2$. Note that $D_0$ has no spokes and $D_n$ has one vertex and one unbounded region.
If $G_s$ is a bouquet, all $D_m$’s are naturally bouquet diagrams. In this case, each step in this spoking algorithm is related to the Type 1 move only, except that the last step is a Type 3 move on $D_{n-1}$ which is a loop with spokes as in the first paragraph in the proof of Claim \[claim:cutpointfree\]. By Proposition \[prop:unchanged\], the number of spokes of $D_n$ is $v(G_s) + r(D_0) - 1$.
Remember that $G_s$ has $e(G_s)$ edges and its diagram $D_0$ has $c(G_s)$ crossings. Then the underlying graph $\overline{D}_0$ must have $v(G_s) + c(G_s)$ vertices and $e(G_s) + 2 c(G_s)$ edges. By the Euler characteristic equation, $r(D_0) - (e(G_s) + 2 c(G_s)) + (v(G_s) + c(G_s)) =2$. So we have, $ v(G_s) + r(D_0) = c(G_s) + e(G_s) + 2$.
Therefore, for each non-bouquet cut-component, $\alpha(G_s) \leq c(G_s) + e(G_s)$, while for a bouquet cut-component, $\alpha(G_s) \leq c(G_s) + e(G_s) + 1$.
Now we will combine all cut-components into $G$.
\[claim:combine\] Suppose that a spatial graph $G$ can be split into two spatial graphs $H$ and $H'$ by a 2-sphere disjoint from $G$ or meeting $G$ only at a vertex. Then, $$\alpha(G) = \alpha(H) + \alpha(H').$$
If the splitting 2-sphere is disjoint from $G$, this equality is obvious.
Suppose that $H$ and $H'$ meet only at a vertex $v$. Consider their arc presentations with $\alpha(H)$ and $\alpha(H')$ pages each. As in the arc presentation theory for knot, without changing the type of spatial graphs, we always rotate binding points upward or downward through the infinity level so that any given binding point goes to the lowest or highest level. Therefore we assume that the arc presentation of $H$ has the vertex $v$ at the lowest level, while the arc presentation of $H$ has it at the highest level. Just attach them at $v$ as in Figure \[fig:union\] to build an arc presentation of $G$ with $\alpha(H) + \alpha(H')$ pages. So the inequality $\alpha(G) \leq \alpha(H) + \alpha(H')$ holds.
![Attaching two arc presentations of spatial graphs[]{data-label="fig:union"}](fig9.eps)
On the other hand, consider an arc presentation of $G$ with $\alpha(G)$ pages. If we delete all arcs in this arc presentation related to $H'$ (or $H$), the result is still an arc presentation of $H$ ($H'$ respectively). Thus the inequality $\alpha(G) \geq \alpha(H) + \alpha(H')$ must be satisfied.
This claim guarantees that $$\alpha(G) = \sum_{s=1}^t \alpha(G_s) \leq \sum_{s=1}^t \big( c(G_s) + e(G_s) \big) + b
= c(G) + e + b.$$
Furthermore, there are many examples ensuring that this upper bound is lowest possible. As stated in Theorem \[thm:bp\], any prime alternating knot $K$, a bouquet with one edge, has arc index $\alpha(K) = c(K)+2$. So we cannot reduce the power and the coefficient of the term $c(K)$. Also the trivial $\theta_e$-curve $G$ with $e$ edges has $\alpha(G) = e$, and the trivial $b$-bouquet graph $G'$ with $b$ loops has $\alpha(G') = 2b$. This completes the proof.
[11]{} Y. Bae and C. Park, [*An upper bound of arc index of links*]{}, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. **129** (2000) 491–500. J. S. Birman and W. W. Menasco, [*Special positions for essential tori in link complements*]{}, Topology **33** (1994) 525–556. P. Cromwell, [*Embedding knots and links in an open book I: Basic properties*]{}, Topol. appl. **64** (1995) 37–58. P. Cromwell and I. Nutt, [*Embedding knots and links in an open book II: Bounds on arc index*]{}, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. **119** (1996) 309–319. G. T. Jin and W. K. Park, [*Prime knots with arc index up to 11 and and upper bound of arc index for non-alternating knots*]{}, J. Knot Theory Ramif. **19** (2010) 1655–1672. H. Moriuchi, [*An enumeration of theta-curves up to seven crossings*]{}, J. Knot Theory Ramif. **18** (2009) 167–197.
[^1]: Mathematics Subject Classification 2010: 57M25 57M27
[^2]: The second author was supported by the BK21 Plus Project through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean Ministry of Education (22A20130011003).
[^3]: The corresponding author(Seungsang Oh) was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIP) (No. NRF-2017R1A2B2007216).
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We compute the shear and bulk viscosities, as well as the thermal conductivity of an ultrarelativistic fluid obeying the relativistic Boltzmann equation in $2+1$ space-time dimensions. The relativistic Boltzmann equation is taken in the single relaxation time approximation, based on two approaches, the first, due to Marle and using the Eckart decomposition, and the second, proposed by Anderson and Witting and using the Landau-Lifshitz decomposition. In both cases, the local equilibrium is given by a Maxwell-Jüttner distribution. It is shown that, apart from slightly different numerical prefactors, the two models lead to a different dependence of the transport coefficients on the fluid temperature, quadratic and linear, for the case of Marle and Anderson-Witting, respectively. However, by modifying the Marle model according to the prescriptions given in Ref. [@Takamoto], it is found that the temperature dependence becomes the same as for the Anderson-Witting model.'
address:
- ' ETH Zürich, Computational Physics for Engineering Materials, Institute for Building Materials, Schafmattstrasse 6, HIF, CH-8093 Zürich (Switzerland)'
- 'ETH Zürich, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Sonneggstrasse 3, ML K 20, CH-8092 Zürich (Switzerland)'
- 'Istituto per le Applicazioni del Calcolo C.N.R., Via dei Taurini, 19 00185, Rome (Italy), and Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies, Albertstrasse, 19, D-79104, Freiburg, (Germany)'
- ' ETH Zürich, Computational Physics for Engineering Materials, Institute for Building Materials, Schafmattstrasse 6, HIF, CH-8093 Zürich (Switzerland), Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Campus do Pici, 60455-760 Fortaleza, Ceará, (Brazil)'
author:
- 'M. Mendoza'
- 'I. Karlin'
- 'S. Succi'
- 'H. J. Herrmann'
bibliography:
- 'report.bib'
title: Ultrarelativistic Transport Coefficients in Two Dimensions
---
Introduction
============
The study of the transport properties of 2D relativistic fluids from the standpoint of kinetic theory is an important topic, still awaiting a complete systematization. Kremer and Devecchi [@kremer2D] calculated the bulk viscosity of a two dimensional relativistic gas using the Anderson-Witting collision operator and the Chapman-Enskog expansion [@Anderson; @RelaBoltEqua; @momentclosure], but did not investigate the shear viscosity and thermal conductivity.
In this paper, we compute the transport coefficients, namely the bulk and shear viscosities and the thermal conductivity, by using two single relaxation time models (also called model equations). The first one, proposed by Marle [@MarleModel], is appropriate for mildly relativistic fluids with moderate values of the Lorentz factor, $\gamma < 2$. The second one, by Anderson and Witting [@Anderson], on the other hand, can deal with significantly larger Lorentz factors. The Marle model, as it was initially proposed in Ref. [@MarleModel], is not appropriate to describe a gas of ultrarelativistic particles, due to the fact that it implies an infinite relaxation time in the limit where the mass of the particles becomes zero, thus leading to divergent transport coefficients. However, Takamoto et al. [@Takamoto] proposed a modified Marle model, whereby the relaxation time of the Boltzmann equation is redefined in such a way as to regulate the aforementioned infinities. In addition, it is known that by promoting the relaxation time to the status of a dynamic field, it is possible to describe complex flows far from equilibrium, such as they occur in turbulence [@science]. Therefore, this single relaxation time model will also be included in the present study of the transport coefficients. In general, model equations do not give the same transport coefficients as the ones obtained from the full Boltzmann equation. However, it was proven in the Ref. [@chapmanmoments] that the methods of Chapman-Enskog and Grad lead to the same approximations to transport coefficients, when polynomial expansions of the distribution function in the peculiar velocity are performed.
In both cases, we use the moment expansion of the non-equilibrium distribution, similar to the fourteen fields[@RelaBoltEqua; @otherkinetic3D; @momentclosure] in the three-dimensional case. To the best of our knowledge, this task has never been undertaken before for the case of two spatial dimensions. This is all but an academic exercise, since two-dimensional relativistic flows arise in many areas of modern physics, say, cosmology, e.g. in galaxy formation from fluctuations in the early universe [@galaxyformation], as well as in high-energy nuclear physics, e.g energetic heavy ions collisions [@heavyheavy]. Two-dimensional ultrarelativistic fluids received a further boost of popularity in 2004, with the discovery of the gapless semiconductor graphene [@natletter; @Geim1]. This consists of literally a single carbon monolayer and represents the first instance of a truly two-dimensional material (the “ultimate flatland”[@PhysToday]), where electrons move like massless chiral particles, whose dynamics is governed by the Dirac equation, with the Fermi velocity playing the role of the speed of light in relativity [@CastroNeto09; @Peres10]. However, the calculation of the transport coefficients is more general and can be extended to any statistical system of quasi-particles governed by relativistic Boltzmann-like equations, i.e. it might apply to a whole class of systems where physical signals are forced to move close to the their ultimate limiting speed [@SR2012].
The results of this paper are restricted by the range of applicability of the Boltzmann equation to (quasi) two-dimensional systems. It is well known that linearizing hydrodynamics in two dimensions leads to divergent transport coefficients, both in classical and relativistic systems [@transanomalous; @transanomalous2]. However, as long as the Boltzmann equation provides a useful semi-phenomenological approximation to transport phenomena, as for example evidenced by the use of the Boltzmann equation in quantum transport [@reviewgrap], results of our computations remain valid.
We wish to emphasize that the main goal of the present paper is to derive the transport coefficients for $2+1$ dimensional relativistic fluids, [*out of prescribed relaxation times*]{}. In the non-relativistic case, this task is pretty straightforward, since in an absolute reference frame, there is no ambiguity as to the definition of the macroscopic observables (kinetic moments) in terms of the Boltzmann distribution. In the relativistic case, on the other hand, this correspondence, i.e. the projection from the kinetic to the hydrodynamic space, is much less direct and requires careful consideration. Besides its theoretical interest, the practical target of this work is to provide operational input for lattice formulations of the Boltzmann equation, which have recently shown major potential for the numerical simulation of a broad class of relativistic flows across scales, from astrophysical flows, all the way down to quark-gluon plasmas [@LBE1; @LBE2; @rlbPRL; @rlbhupp], including turbulent phenomena in the two-dimensional electronic gas in graphene [@turbPRL].
Non-Equilibrium Distribution
============================
The single relaxation time Boltzmann equation for the Minkowski metric, $\eta^{\alpha \beta}$, can be written as [@RelaBoltEqua] $$\label{Boltzmann:eqM}
p^\mu \partial_\mu f = -\frac{mc}{\tau_M}( f - f^{\rm eq} ) \quad ,$$ for the case of the Marle model [@MarleModel], and as $$\label{Boltzmann:eqAW}
p^\mu \partial_\mu f = -\frac{p^\mu U_\mu}{c^2 \tau}( f - f^{\rm eq} ) \quad ,$$ for the case of Anderson and Witting model [@Anderson]. Here, $m$ is the mass of the particles, $c$ the speed of light, $k_B$ the Boltzmann constant, $f$ the probability distribution function (which can denote any scalar field in phase space), $\tau$ the single relaxation time for the Anderson-Witting model, and $\tau_M$ the respective one for the case of the Marle model. The 3-momentum is denoted by $p^\mu = (p^0, \vec{p})$, and the macroscopic 3-velocity by $U^\mu$. Greek indices run from $0$ to $2$, being $0$ the temporal component, and we have adopted the Einstein notation (repeated indexes are summed). For the purpose of this work, we are using the signature $(+,-,-)$. The equilibrium distribution $f^{\rm eq}$ is given by [@RelaBoltEqua] $$\label{MJ:eq}
f^{\rm eq} = A(n,T) \exp(-p_\mu U^\mu/k_B T) \quad ,$$ where $A(n, T)$ is a normalization constant that depends on the temperature and the number of particles density $n$. In this work, we will study the ultrarelativistic regime, which is characterized by $\xi \equiv mc^2/k_B T \ll 1$. From now on, we will use natural units, $m = c = k_B = 1$, and the following notation: $$\begin{aligned}
\Delta^{\alpha \beta} &= \eta^{\alpha \beta} - U^\alpha U ^\beta
\quad , \nonumber \\
T^{(\alpha \beta)} &= \frac{1}{2} ( \Delta^\alpha_\gamma
\Delta^\beta_\delta + \Delta^\beta_\gamma \Delta^\alpha_\delta )
T^{\gamma \delta}
\quad , \nonumber \\
T^{<\alpha \beta>} &= T^{(\alpha \beta)} - \frac{1}{2}
\Delta^{\alpha \beta} \Delta_{\gamma \delta}
T^{(\gamma \delta)}
\quad , \nonumber \\
\nabla^\alpha &= \Delta^{\alpha \beta} \partial_\beta \quad .\end{aligned}$$
In order to identify the physical meaning of the different terms in the balance and transport equations, it is useful to introduce decompositions of these terms with respect to orthogonal quantities. Note that $\Delta^{\alpha \beta}$ and $U^\alpha$ are orthogonal quantities, $\Delta^{\alpha \beta} U_\beta = 0$, so that any 3-vector can be decomposed into this orthogonal basis. We begin with the Eckart decomposition [@eckart], and later make the due corrections to take into account the one proposed by Landau and Lifshitz [@Anderson; @RelaBoltEqua].
In the Eckart decomposition, the entropy 3-flow, defined by $$S^\alpha = -\int p^\alpha f \ln (f) \frac{d^2p}{p^0} \quad ,$$ can be written as follows: $$S^\alpha = n s U^\alpha + \varphi^\alpha \quad ,$$ where $s = S^\alpha U_\alpha /n$ is the entropy per particle and $\varphi^\alpha = \Delta_\beta^\alpha S^\beta$ the entropy flux.
In order to obtain the non-equilibrium distribution, we begin by maximizing the entropy per particle, under the following constraints: $$\begin{aligned}
N^\alpha U_\alpha &= U_\alpha \int p^\alpha f \frac{d^2p}{p^0}
\quad , \nonumber \\
T^{\alpha \beta} U_\alpha &= U_\alpha \int p^\alpha p^\beta f \frac{d^2p}{p^0}
\quad , \nonumber \\
T^{<\gamma \beta> \alpha} U_\alpha &= U_\alpha \int p^\alpha
p^{<\gamma} p^{\beta >} f \frac{d^2p}{p^0}
\quad ,\end{aligned}$$ where, $$p^{<\alpha} p^{\beta >} = p^{(\alpha} p^{ \beta)} - \frac{1}{2}
\Delta^{\alpha \beta} \Delta_{\gamma \delta} p^{(\gamma}p^{\delta)}
\quad ,$$ and $$p^{(\alpha} p^{\beta )} = \frac{1}{2} ( \Delta^\alpha_\gamma
\Delta^\beta_\delta + \Delta^\beta_\gamma \Delta^\alpha_\delta )
p^{\gamma}p^{\delta} \quad .$$
In principle, the moments $N^\alpha$ and $T^{\alpha \beta}$ would be a more natural choice. However, the resulting procedure to compute the Lagrange multipliers via entropy maximization, while leading to equivalent results [@RelaBoltEqua], proves significantly more complicated. The problem of maximizing the entropy is equivalent to consider the following functional, $${\cal{F}} = s - \lambda N^\alpha U_\alpha - \lambda_\beta T^{\alpha
\beta} U_\alpha - \lambda_{<\gamma \beta>} T^{<\gamma \beta>
\alpha} U_\alpha \quad ,$$ and applying the functional derivative $\delta {\cal{F}}/\delta f =
0$. Here, $\lambda$, $\lambda_\beta$, and $\lambda_{<\gamma \beta>}$ are Lagrange multiplier that we must determine. In two dimensions, there are nine independent multipliers, since by definition $\eta^{\gamma \beta} \lambda_{<\gamma \beta>} = 0$, which represents an extra equation.
Following the procedure, as a result, one can approximate the non-equilibrium distribution function by, $$\label{EqD}
f \simeq f^{\rm eq} \left [ 1 - n \left ( \lambda + \lambda_\beta
p^\beta + \lambda_{<\gamma \beta>} p^\gamma p^\beta \right ) \right ] \quad .$$
By decomposing the Lagrange multipliers in the orthogonal basis in space-time, $$\lambda_\beta = \lambda' U_\beta + \lambda'_\gamma
\Delta^\gamma_\beta \quad ,$$ $$\begin{aligned}
\lambda_{<\gamma \beta>} &= \Lambda U_\beta U_\gamma + \frac{1}{2}
\Lambda_\alpha (\Delta_\gamma^\alpha U_\beta + \Delta^\alpha_\beta
U_\gamma ) \nonumber \\ &+ \Lambda_{\alpha \delta} \left ( \Delta_\gamma^\alpha
\Delta_\beta^\delta - \frac{1}{2} \Delta^{\alpha \delta}
\Delta_{\gamma \beta} \right) \quad .\end{aligned}$$ and inserting these variables into the equilibrium distribution, Eq. (\[EqD\]), we obtain $$\begin{aligned}
\label{EqD2}
f &= f^{\rm eq} \bigg[ 1 - n \lambda - n \left( \lambda' U_\beta +
\lambda'_\gamma \Delta^\gamma_\beta \right) p^\beta \nonumber \\ &- n
\bigg( \Lambda U_\beta U_\gamma + \frac{1}{2} \Lambda_\alpha
(\Delta_\gamma^\alpha U_\beta + \Delta^\alpha_\beta U_\gamma )
\nonumber \\ &+ \Lambda_{\alpha \delta} \left ( \Delta_\gamma^\alpha
\Delta_\beta^\delta - \frac{1}{2} \Delta^{\alpha \delta}
\Delta_{\gamma \beta} \right) p^\gamma p^\beta \bigg ) \bigg
] \quad .\end{aligned}$$
In the Grad method, we need to determine the value of the Lagrange multipliers in terms of the macroscopic fields, $n$, $U^\alpha$, $T$, $\omega$, $P^{<\alpha \beta>}$, and $q^\alpha$ (being the particle density, macroscopic 3-velocity, temperature, dynamic pressure, pressure deviator, and heat flux, respectively). The dynamic pressure is defined by $\omega = - \mu \nabla_\alpha U^\alpha$, and the pressure deviator by $P^{<\alpha \beta>} = 2 \eta \nabla^{<\alpha}
U^{\beta>}$, being $\mu$ and $\eta$ the bulk and shear viscosities respectively. In this procedure, we also need the moments of the equilibrium distribution function, which have been introduced in Appendix \[moments5th\].
Let us impose that the actual distribution function carries the same first moment as the equilibrium distribution, namely: $$N^\alpha = \int f p^\alpha \frac{d^2p}{p^0} = \int f^{\rm eq}
p^\alpha \frac{d^2p}{p^0} \quad ,$$ and apply the projectors, $U_\alpha$ and $\Delta_\alpha^\beta$, to obtain respectively the first two equations for the Lagrange multipliers, $$\begin{aligned}
\label{equationslagrange}
-n^2 [\lambda + 2T (3 T \Lambda + \lambda')] &= 0 \quad , \nonumber \\
n T \lambda'_{\gamma}\Delta^{\gamma \beta} + 3 n T^2
\Lambda_\gamma \Delta^{\gamma \beta} &= 0 \quad .\end{aligned}$$ In order to obtain the other equations, we calculate the energy-momentum tensor, $$\label{energymomentum}
T^{\alpha \beta} = \int f p^\alpha p^\beta\frac{d^2p}{p^0} \quad ,$$ and introduce the projectors: $$\begin{aligned}
\label{projectors}
\left ( \Delta_\alpha^\gamma \Delta^\delta_\beta - \frac{1}{2}
\Delta^{\gamma \delta} \Delta_{\alpha \beta} \right ) T^{\alpha \beta} &=
P^{<\gamma \delta>} \quad , \nonumber \\
\Delta_\alpha^\gamma U_\beta T^{\alpha \beta} &=
q^{\gamma} \quad , \nonumber \\
\Delta_{\alpha\beta} T^{\alpha \beta} &= -2(p + \omega) \quad ,
\nonumber \\
U_\alpha U_\beta T^{\alpha \beta} &= \epsilon \quad ,\end{aligned}$$ where $\epsilon$ and $p$ are the energy density and hydrostatic pressure, respectively.
Thus, by inserting the distribution function in Eq. (\[energymomentum\]), and taking the projectors defined in Eq. (\[projectors\]), we obtain the following relations, $$\begin{aligned}
\label{fourteenmoments}
\omega &= -n^2 T ( \lambda + 3T (4T \Lambda + \lambda') ) \quad ,
\nonumber \\
\epsilon &= 2nT -2 n^2 T ( \lambda + 3T (4T \Lambda + \lambda') )
\quad , \nonumber\\
q^\gamma &= 3n^2T^2 \Delta^{\delta \gamma} \lambda'_\delta + 12
n^2T^3 \Delta^{\delta \gamma} \Lambda_{\delta} \quad , \nonumber\\
P^{<\gamma \delta>} &= - 6 n^2 T^3 \Lambda^{<\gamma \delta>} \quad .\end{aligned}$$
Note that by imposing the state equation for the ultrarelativistic system, $\epsilon = 2nT$, implies that that $\omega$ becomes zero. This is equivalent to say that the bulk viscosity vanishes, like in three dimensions. In addition, this gives $\lambda = -T \lambda'$, $\Lambda = -\lambda'/6T$, where $\lambda'$ can take any value. For simplicity, we will set $\lambda'=0$. The arbitrariness on this parameter is due to the fact that, in the ultrarelativistic regime (virtually massless excitations), the number of particles density, $n$, and the temperature of the system, are not independent, since $n
\sim T^2$ (e.g. gas of photons). In other words, the number of particles density is fixed once the energy density $\epsilon$ of the system is chosen, and therefore one Lagrange multiplier falls apart.
In order to obtain the other Lagrange multipliers, we solve the system of algebraic equations, Eqs. (\[equationslagrange\]) and (\[fourteenmoments\]), to obtain: $$\begin{aligned}
\Delta^{\delta \gamma} \Lambda_\delta &= \frac{1}{3n^2T^3} q^\gamma
\quad , \nonumber\\
\Lambda^{<\gamma \delta>} &= -\frac{1}{6 n^2 T^3} p^{<\gamma \delta>}
\quad , \nonumber\\
\Delta^{\delta \gamma} \lambda'_\delta &= -\frac{1}{n^2T^2} q^\gamma
\quad . \end{aligned}$$
Replacing these equations into the definition of the non-equilibrium distribution, we obtain: $$\begin{aligned}
\label{EqD3}
f = f^{\rm eq} \bigg[ 1 + \frac{q_\beta p^\beta}{nT^2} &-
\frac{1}{3nT^3} q_\gamma U_\beta p^\gamma p^\beta +
\frac{p_{<\gamma \beta>}}{6 n T^3} p^\gamma p^\beta \bigg ] .\end{aligned}$$
This is the non-equilibrium distribution function for a two-dimensional ultrarelativistic system, as expressed in terms of the nine moments. The results described here can also be obtained by using the so-called triangle scheme [@IlyaBook], which is equivalent to the Grad method. In order to calculate the explicit values of the heat flux and the pressure deviator, we have to solve the Boltzmann equation. For the purpose of this study, we choose two approaches for the collision operator, the first one proposed by Marle [@MarleModel], and the second one by Anderson and Witting [@Anderson].
3th order moments of the Non-eq Distribution
============================================
The third order moment of the distribution function can be calculated as follows: $$T^{\alpha \beta \gamma} = \int f p^\alpha p^\beta p^\gamma
\frac{d^2p}{p^0} \quad .$$
By replacing Eq. (\[EqD3\]) into this equation and rising the indexes for the nine fields, we obtain for the third order moment, $$\begin{aligned}
T^{\alpha \beta \gamma} &= T^{\alpha \beta \gamma}_{E} +
\frac{q^\epsilon}{n T^2} \eta_{\beta \epsilon} T^{\alpha \beta
\gamma \delta}_E \nonumber \\ &- \frac{q^\epsilon U^\lambda}{3 n T^3}
\eta_{\delta \epsilon} \eta_{\sigma \lambda} T^{\alpha \beta
\gamma \delta \sigma}_E+ \frac{P^{<\epsilon \lambda>}}{6 n T^3}
\eta_{\delta \epsilon} \eta_{\sigma \lambda} T^{\alpha \beta
\gamma \delta \sigma}_E \quad .\end{aligned}$$
Note that for an accurate calculation of the third order moment of the distribution function, knowledge up to the fifth order moment of the equilibrium distribution (denoted by subindex $E$) is required. The moments of the equilibrium distribution, Eq. (\[MJ:eq\]), are introduced in Appendix \[moments5th\]. Thus, replacing the respective moments of the equilibrium distribution, we obtain the third order moment, $$\begin{aligned}
\label{3rdmoment}
T^{\alpha \beta \gamma} &= 15 n T^2 U^\alpha U^\beta U^\gamma
\nonumber \\
&- 3 n T^2 ( \eta^{\alpha \beta} U^{\gamma} + \eta^{\alpha \gamma}
U^{\beta} + \eta^{\beta \gamma} U^{\alpha} ) \nonumber \\ &- 2 T (
\eta^{\alpha \beta} q^{\gamma} + \eta^{\alpha \gamma} q^{\beta} +
\eta^{\beta \gamma} q^{\alpha} ) \nonumber \\ &+ 10 T ( U^{\alpha} U^{\beta}
q^{\gamma} + U^{\alpha} U^{\gamma} q^{\beta} + U^{\beta}
U^{\gamma} q^{\alpha} ) \nonumber \\ & + 5 T ( p^{<\alpha \beta>} U^{\gamma}
+ p^{<\alpha \gamma>} U^{\beta} + p^{<\beta \gamma>} U^{\alpha}
)\quad .\end{aligned}$$
With this expression at hand, we are ready to consider the Boltzmann equation. For the case of the Marle model, we have all the needed quantities in place. However, for the Anderson Witting, some corrections are required, which we shall be introduced in Sec. \[AW3rd\].
Marle Model
-----------
For the case of the Boltzmann equation for the Marle model, Eq. (\[Boltzmann:eqM\]), it is assumed that, $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eckart:eq}
\int f \frac{d^2p}{p^0} &= \int f^{\rm eq} \frac{d^2p}{p^0} = A =
A_E \quad , \nonumber\\
\int f p^\alpha \frac{d^2p}{p^0} &= \int f^{\rm eq} p^\alpha
\frac{d^2p}{p^0} = N^\alpha = N_E^\alpha \quad . \end{aligned}$$
These conditions are satisfied in the Eckart decomposition [@eckart], as in the three dimensional case. The first order moment of the distribution, $N^\alpha$, is defined by $n U^\alpha$, the second moment is defined by $$T^{\alpha \beta} = P^{<\alpha \beta>} - p \Delta^{\alpha \beta} +
(U^\alpha q^{\beta} + U^\beta q^{\alpha}) + \epsilon U^\alpha
U^\beta \quad ,$$ and the third order moment is calculated as described before, via Eq. (\[3rdmoment\]). These are functions of $U^\alpha$, so that we do not need any correction to the moment definitions. By integrating the Boltzmann equation, Eq. (\[Boltzmann:eqM\]), in the momentum space, and taking into account the relations (\[eckart:eq\]), we obtain, $\partial_\alpha N^\alpha = 0$, and by multiplying the equation by $p^\beta$ and repeating the same procedure, we further obtain $\partial_\alpha T^{\alpha \beta} = 0$. These are the conservation equations for $N^\alpha$ and $T^{\alpha \beta}$.
However, by multiplying the equations by $p^\beta p^\gamma$, we obtain a different equation, $\partial_\alpha T^{\alpha \beta \gamma} =
-(1/\tau_M) (T^{\beta \gamma} - T^{\beta \gamma}_E )$, which contains the information about the transport coefficients. By a standard iteration procedure [@RelaBoltEqua], we can convert this equation into $$\label{marlediss}
T^{\beta \gamma} - T^{\beta \gamma}_E = -\tau_M \partial_\alpha
T^{\alpha \beta \gamma}_E \quad .$$ This means that for the Marle model, we just need to know the third order moment of the equilibrium distribution, and the second order moment of both, the non-equilibrium and equilibrium distributions. The corresponding transport coefficients will be calculated in Sec. \[tcoe\].
Anderson-Witting Model {#AW3rd}
----------------------
For the case of the Anderson-Witting model, we should use the Landau-Lifshitz decomposition [@Anderson; @RelaBoltEqua]. Such decomposition implies that $U^\alpha$ must be calculated, by solving the eigenvalue problem, $T^{\alpha \beta}U_{L \alpha} = \epsilon U_{L
\alpha}$ (subindex $L$ denotes Landau-Lifshitz). In general, $U^\alpha$, calculated with the Eckart decomposition using $N^\alpha =
n U^\alpha$, will differ from the one calculated with the energy flux, $U_{L}^\alpha$. As a consequence, we must find the relation between both quantities and the correct expression for the third order kinetic moment.
In the Landau-Lifshitz decomposition, we assume that $N^\alpha
U_\alpha = N^\alpha_E U_\alpha$, $U_\alpha T^{\alpha \beta} = U_\alpha
T^{\alpha \beta}_E$. Moreover, the first and second order moments of the distribution are defined by, $$\begin{aligned}
N^{\alpha} &= n U^\alpha_L + J^\alpha \quad , \nonumber \\
T^{\alpha \beta} &= P_L^{<\alpha \beta>} - p_L \Delta_L^{\alpha \beta} + \epsilon_L U_L^\alpha
U_L^\beta \quad . \end{aligned}$$
It can be easily shown that the correspondence between $U^\alpha$ and $U^\alpha_L$ for the ultrarelativisitic case is $U^\alpha = U^\alpha_L
- q^\alpha/3 n$, with $J^\alpha = - q^\alpha/3 T$. The conservation equations $\partial_\alpha N^\alpha = 0$ and $\partial_\alpha
T^{\alpha \beta} = 0$ can be obtained by multiplying by $1$ and $p^\beta$, and integrating the Boltzmann equation in the momentum space, respectively.
By multiplying by $p^{\beta} p^{\gamma}$ and applying the Maxwell iteration procedure as before, we obtain: $$\label{AWdiss}
(T^{\alpha \beta \gamma} - T^{\alpha \beta \gamma}_E) U_{L\alpha} = -\tau \partial_\alpha
T^{\alpha \beta \gamma}_E \quad .$$ Note that in this case, at variance with the Marle case, the third order moment of the non-equilibrium and equilibrium distribution functions is needed. To calculate the correct expression for the third order moment, it is sufficient to replace $U^\alpha$ by $U^\alpha_L - q^\alpha/3 n$ into Eq. (\[3rdmoment\]), retaining up to linear terms in the nine fields. This delivers: $$\begin{aligned}
\label{3rdmomentAW}
T^{\alpha \beta \gamma} &= 15 n T^2 U_L^\alpha U_L^\beta U_L^\gamma \nonumber\\
&- 3 n T^2 ( \eta^{\alpha \beta} U_L^{\gamma} + \eta^{\alpha \gamma}
U_L^{\beta} + \eta^{\beta \gamma} U_L^{\alpha} ) \nonumber\\ &- T (
\eta^{\alpha \beta} q^{\gamma} + \eta^{\alpha \gamma} q^{\beta} +
\eta^{\beta \gamma} q^{\alpha} ) \nonumber\\ &+ 5 T ( U_L^{\alpha} U_L^{\beta}
q^{\gamma} + U_L^{\alpha} U_L^{\gamma} q^{\beta} + U_L^{\beta}
U_L^{\gamma} q^{\alpha} ) \nonumber \\ & + 5 T ( P^{<\alpha \beta>} U_L^{\gamma}
+ P^{<\alpha \gamma>} U_L^{\beta} + P^{<\beta \gamma>} U_L^{\alpha}
)\quad .\end{aligned}$$
Everything being in place, we next proceed to calculate the transport coefficients for the two-dimensional ultrarelativistic system, using both decompositions.
Transport coefficients {#tcoe}
======================
Since we found that the bulk viscosity vanishes, we focus on the shear viscosity and the thermal conductivity. First, let us consider the Marle model and use the expressions (\[projectors\]. By applying the projector $\Delta_\beta^\delta U_\gamma$ to Eq. (\[marlediss\]), we obtain the heat flux, $$q^\delta = 3nT \tau_M \left ( \nabla^\delta T - \frac{1}{3n}
\nabla^\delta p \right ) \quad ,$$ and by applying the projector $\Delta_\beta^{(\epsilon} \Delta^{\delta
)}_\gamma - \frac{1}{2} \Delta^{\epsilon \delta} \Delta_{\beta
\gamma}$, we obtain the pressure deviator, $$P^{<\alpha \beta>} = 6 n T^2 \tau_M \nabla^{<\alpha} U^{\beta >} \quad .$$ From this two relations we can conclude that the transport coefficients in the model of Marle are given by, $$\kappa_M = \frac{ 3 c^2 k_B}{\xi} n \tau_M, \quad \eta_M = \frac{3}{\xi} n
k_B T \tau_M, \quad \mu_M = 0
\quad ,$$ being the thermal conductivity, the shear viscosity, and the bulk viscosity, respectively. Note that we have restablished the physical units.
For the case of the Anderson-Witting model, we use Eq. (\[AWdiss\]) and apply the same projectors, finding $$q^\delta = \frac{3}{8} nT \tau \left ( \nabla^\delta T - \frac{1}{3n}
\nabla^\delta p \right ) \quad ,$$ for the heat flux and $$P^{<\alpha \beta>} = \frac{6}{5} n T \tau \nabla^{<\alpha} U^{\beta >} \quad .$$ for the pressure deviator. With these expressions, the transport coefficients take the form: $$\kappa_{AW} = \frac{3 c^2 k_B}{8} n \tau, \quad \eta_{AW} =
\frac{3}{5} n k_B T \tau, \quad \mu_{AW} = 0
\quad .$$
Here, as in the case of the Marle model, we have restored the physical units. Note that the main difference between the transport coefficients, apart from different numerical prefactors, is that the ones calculated with the Anderson and Witting collision operator have a different dependence on the temperature than the ones calculated with the Marle model (since $\xi$ also depends on $T$).
Considering a non-degenerate gas of relativistic particles in the ultrarelativistic regime, the number of particles density is given by $n = k_B^2 T^2/ 2 \pi c^2 \hbar^2$. By taking this into account, we see from Fig. \[fig1\] that the thermal conductivity $\kappa_M$ decreases with $\xi^3$, while $\kappa_{AW}$ with $\xi^2$. On the other hand, in Fig. \[fig2\], we can observe that the shear viscosity, displays the same qualitative behavior, $\eta_M$ decreases with $\xi^4$ while $\eta_{AW}$ with $\xi^3$. In general, given any relativistic system, one can test which single relaxation time approximation, Marle or Anderson-Witting, better reproduces its behavior. We have considered only values $1/\xi > 1$, since our calculations are valid only in this regime.
An interesting calculation is to apply the corrections proposed by Takamoto [@Takamoto] to the Marle model to account properly for the ultrarelativistic regime, $\xi \rightarrow 0$, of a gas of particles. Although this work was developed in $3+1$ dimensional space-time, we will follow a similar procedure for the case of $2+1$ dimensions. To this purpose, we replace the relaxation time $\tau_M$ by its average in momentum space, namely: $$\tau_M = \frac{mc}{n} \int \frac{d^2p}{p^0} f^{eq} \tau_{rel} =
\xi \tau_{rel} \quad ,$$ where $\tau_{rel}$ is now the effective relaxation time of the system and $\tau_M$ a simple parameter in the relativistic Boltzmann equation. By replacing this relation in the equations for the transport coefficients in the case of the Marle model, we obtain $$\kappa_{rel} = 3 c^2 k_B n \tau_{rel}, \quad \eta_{rel} = 3 n k_B T \tau_{rel}, \quad \mu_{rel} = 0
\quad .$$ Note that these transport coefficients carry the same dependence on temperature as in the case of the Anderson-Witting model. The numerical coefficients, though, are not the same.
![Thermal conductivity $\kappa$ as a function of $\xi$. In this calculation we have set $\tau = \tau_M$. The Marle coefficient is systematically higher than the Anderson-Witting one, and the ratio of the two grows at increasing $1/\xi$, i.e. at increasing temperature.[]{data-label="fig1"}](fig1diss.eps)
![Shear viscosity $\eta$ as a function of $\xi$. In this calculation we have set $\tau = \tau_M$. Like for the case of Figure 1, the Marle coefficient is systematically higher than the Anderson-Witting one, and the ratio of the two grows at increasing $1/\xi$, i.e. at increasing temperature. []{data-label="fig2"}](fig2diss.eps)
Conclusions and Discussions
===========================
In this work, we have calculated the transport coefficients, namely the bulk and shear viscosities, and the thermal conductivity of a two dimensional ultra-relativistic system, using two different forms of the collision operator. The first one is based on the Marle model and the second one on the Anderson Witting approach. Depending on the approach, we have to satisfy the Eckart or the Landau-Lifshitz decompositions, respectively. This leads to different expressions for the transport equations and third order moment of the distribution function.
We have found that the bulk viscosity of the ultrarelativistic system disappears as a consequence of the choice of the two-dimensional ultra-relativistic equation of state, which imposes a constraint on the trace of the momentum-energy tensor. This is the same behavior observed for the three dimensional case. By analyzing the transport coefficients for the case of an ultrarelativistic gas of particles, we have found that the thermal conductivity decreases with $\xi^3$ and $\xi^2$, for the case of Marle and Anderson-Witting, respectively. The shear viscosity presents the same qualitative behavior, decreasing with $\xi^4$ and $\xi^3$ for both models, respectively. Therefore, the Marle model transport coefficients always decrease faster than the ones based on the Anderson-Witting model. In a more general relativistic system, by knowing this difference, one could select which one of the two is better suited to describe its dynamics evolution. In addition, following the work by Takamoto [@Takamoto], we have modified the two-dimensional transport coefficients for the case of the Marle model, in such a way as to make it suitable for a gas of ultra-relativistic particles. With such modification, the functional dependence of the transport coefficients on the temperature becomes the same as for the Anderson-Witting model, although with different numerical coefficients.
It is known that transport coefficients in 2d are formally infrared divergent, hence their size and gradient dependence must be taken with some caution in practical applications [@transanomalous; @transanomalous2]. The investigation of these issues in the relativistic framework makes an interesting object of future research.
The results presented in this paper can be applied to a variety of ultrarelativistic systems, e.g. graphene, plasma jets and others. The method is not limited to ultra-relativistic gases of particles, and it extends to any statistical system obeying relativistic Boltzmann-like equations.
Acknowledgments {#acknowledgments .unnumbered}
===============
We acknowledge financial support from the European Research Council (ERC) Advanced Grant 319968-FlowCCS. I.V.K. was supported by the ERC Grant ELBM.
Moments of the Equilibrium Distribution {#moments5th}
=======================================
The moments of the equilibrium distribution for a two-dimensional ultrarelativistic system that satisfies the Maxwell Jüttner distribution are given by, $$N_E^\alpha = n U^\alpha \quad ,$$ $$T_E^{\alpha \beta} = - n T \eta^{\alpha \beta} + 3 n T U^\alpha U^\beta \quad ,$$ $$\begin{aligned}
T_E^{\alpha \beta \gamma} = - 3 n T^2 (\eta^{\alpha \beta}
U^\gamma &+ \eta^{\alpha \gamma} U^\beta + \eta^{\beta \gamma}
U^\alpha) \nonumber\\ &+ 15 n T^2 U^\alpha U^\beta U^\gamma \quad ,\end{aligned}$$ $$\begin{aligned}
T_E^{\alpha \beta \gamma \delta} &= 3 n T^3 (\eta^{\alpha \beta}
\eta^{\gamma \delta} + \eta^{\alpha \gamma} \eta^{\beta \delta}
+ \eta^{\gamma \beta} \eta^{\alpha \delta} ) \nonumber\\ &- 15 n T^3 (
\eta^{\alpha \beta} U^\gamma U^\delta + \eta^{\alpha \gamma}
U^\beta U^\delta + \eta^{\gamma \beta} U^\alpha U^\delta \nonumber\\ &+
\eta^{\alpha \delta} U^\gamma U^\beta + \eta^{\delta \gamma}
U^\beta U^\alpha + \eta^{\delta \beta} U^\alpha U^\gamma ) \nonumber\\ &+ 105
n T^3 U^\alpha U^\beta U^\gamma U^\delta \quad ,\end{aligned}$$ $$\begin{aligned}
T_E^{\alpha \beta \gamma \delta \epsilon} &= 15 n T^4 [
U^\epsilon (\eta^{\alpha \beta} \eta^{\gamma \delta} +
\eta^{\alpha \gamma} \eta^{\beta \delta} + \eta^{\gamma \beta}
\eta^{\alpha \delta} ) \nonumber\\ &+ U^\alpha (\eta^{\epsilon \beta}
\eta^{\gamma \delta} + \eta^{\epsilon \gamma} \eta^{\beta
\delta} + \eta^{\gamma \beta} \eta^{\epsilon \delta} ) \nonumber\\ &+
U^\beta (\eta^{\alpha \epsilon} \eta^{\gamma \delta} +
\eta^{\alpha \gamma} \eta^{\epsilon \delta} + \eta^{\gamma
\epsilon} \eta^{\alpha \delta} ) \nonumber\\ &+ U^\beta (\eta^{\alpha
\epsilon} \eta^{\gamma \delta} + \eta^{\alpha \gamma}
\eta^{\epsilon \delta} + \eta^{\gamma \epsilon} \eta^{\alpha
\delta} ) \nonumber\\ &+ U^\gamma (\eta^{\alpha \beta} \eta^{\epsilon
\delta} + \eta^{\alpha \epsilon} \eta^{\beta \delta} +
\eta^{\epsilon \beta} \eta^{\alpha \delta} ) \nonumber\\ &+ U^\delta
(\eta^{\alpha \beta} \eta^{\gamma \epsilon} + \eta^{\alpha
\gamma} \eta^{\beta \epsilon} + \eta^{\gamma \beta}
\eta^{\alpha \epsilon} ) ] \nonumber\\ & - 105 n T^4 ( \eta^{\alpha
\beta} U^\gamma U^\delta U^\epsilon + \eta^{\alpha \gamma}
U^\beta U^\delta U^\epsilon \nonumber\\ &+ \eta^{\alpha \delta} U^\beta
U^\gamma U^\epsilon + \eta^{\delta \gamma} U^\alpha U^\beta
U^\epsilon \nonumber\\ &+ \eta^{\delta \beta} U^\alpha U^\gamma
U^\epsilon + \eta^{\beta \gamma} U^\alpha U^\delta U^\epsilon \nonumber\\
&+ \eta^{\alpha \epsilon} U^\beta U^\gamma U^\delta +
\eta^{\beta \epsilon} U^\alpha U^\gamma U^\delta + \eta^{\gamma
\epsilon} U^\alpha U^\beta U^\delta ) \nonumber\\ &+ 945 n T^4 U^\alpha
U^\beta U^\gamma U^\delta U^\epsilon \quad .\end{aligned}$$
To obtain the moments, we have considered the ultrarelativistic regime, $\xi \ll 1$.
References {#references .unnumbered}
==========
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'Superconductor-based light-emitting diode (superconductor-based LED) in strong light-confinement regime are characterized as a superconductor-based three-terminal device, and its transport properties are quantitatively investigated. In the gate-controlled region, we confirm the realization of new-type Josephson field effect transistor (JoFET) performance, where the channel cross-sectional area of the junction is directly modulated by the gate voltage. In the current-injected region, the superconducting critical current of $\mu$A order in the Josephson junction is found to be modulated by the steady current injection of pA order. This ultrahigh monitoring sensitivity of the radiative recombination process can be explained by taking into account the fact that the energy relaxation of the absorbed photons causes the conversion of superconducting pairs to quasiparticles in the active layer. Using quasiparticle density and superconducting pair density, we discuss the carrier flows together with the non-equilibrium superconductovity in the active layer and the superconducting electrodes, which take place for compensating the conversion.'
author:
- Ryotaro Inoue
- Hideaki Takayanagi
- Tatsushi Akazaki
- Kazunori Tanaka
- Hirotaka Sasakura
- Ikuo Suemune
title: |
Carrier flow and nonequilibrium superconductivity\
in superconductor-based light-emitting diode
---
Introduction
============
Superconductor-based light-emitting diode (superconductor-based LED) is expected to be the key device in quantum information technology because of its possible [*on-demand*]{} generation of entangled photon pairs. In spite of the large mismatch in the energy scale, it is also predicted that the coherence of superconducting pair system can be transferred to photon systems [@AsanoPRL; @JosephsonLED; @JosephsonLaser]. The radiative recombination process in superconductor-based LED has been investigated by optical measurements, which revealed the enhanced oscillator strength [@HayashiAPEx], high quantum efficiency and radiative recombination time rapidly decreasing with temperature [@SuemuneAPEx; @SasakuraPRL; @SuemuneJJAPReview]. In transport measurements, on the other hand, the diffusion of superconducting pairs into the active layer was demonstrated by DC and AC Josephson effect, and the monitoring sensitivity of the radiative recombination process was found to be several orders higher than that in optical measurements although the cause of this ultrahigh sensitivity has not been elucidated [@SuemuneAPEx; @SasakuraPRL; @InoueSuST].
The structure of superconductor-based LED with one normal electrode at the p-type semiconductor side and two superconducting electrodes separated by a slit at the n-type semiconductor side can be considered as a superconductor-based three-terminal device. The superconductor-based three terminal device, such as Josephson Field Effect Transistor (JoFET) [@AkazakiAPL], supercurrent modulation device via normal carrier injection (including 0-$\pi$ transition) [@SchapersAPL; @BaselmansNature], have attracted considerable research interests form the viewpoints of not only superconducting electronics but also fundamental study of superconducting transport itself. Especially in the case of superconductor-based LEDs with narrow slit width treated in this paper, most of the generated photons / photon pairs are absorbed immediately due to the strong light-confinement, and the transport of the device are strongly affected by the radiative recombination process. In this paper, we quantitatively analyze the transport properties of superconductor-based LED characterized as a superconductor-based three-terminal device, and discuss the carrier flows and non-equilibrium superconductivity which are caused by the radiative recombination process.
Experimental Setup
==================
![(a) Schematic cross-sectional view of superconductor-based LED together with the measurement circuit. (b) EL spectrum of superconductor-based LED under the injection of 10 $\mu$A and (c) spectrally-integrated EL intensity as a function of injection. EL data are measured at 0.3 K, in the similar device with different gap between two Nb superconducting electrodes.[]{data-label="fig:Sample"}](Fig1.eps){width="0.9\linewidth"}
Figure \[fig:Sample\](a) shows the schematic cross-sectional view of superconductor-based LED, where p-type indium phosphide (p-InP) layer and n-type indium gallium arsenide (n-InGaAs) layer are stacked on p-InP substrate, and form a p-n junction heterostructure. When positive / negative voltage is applied to the gate electrode under the p-InP substrate, the p-n junction is biased forward / inversely. Two niobium (Nb) superconducting electrodes with a thickness of 800 [Å]{} are attached to the n-InGaAs layer, where superconducting pairs together with quasiparticles diffuse due to the proximity effect. Under the forward-biased condition, normal holes injected from the p-InP layer recombine with the superconducting pairs and quasiparticles in the n-InGaAs active layer. The resultant electroluminescence (EL) emission can be detected from the slit between the two Nb electrodes, the width of which ($L$) is 150 nm. Figures \[fig:Sample\](b) and \[fig:Sample\](c) show EL spectrum and spectrally-integrated EL intensity as a function of injected current, which were measured in the sample with the same composition but with different slit width. It is found that the EL emission of $\sim$0.86 eV, which reflects the band structure of p-n junction, is obtained with the intensity roughly proportional to the injected current.
The two Nb superconducting electrodes together with the n-InGaAs layer between them form a superconductor - semiconductor - superconductor Josephson junction structure. We investigated the Josephson junction characteristics with changing the gate voltage ($V_G$) and / or the injected current ($I_G$), at a temperature of 30 mK using a dilution refrigerator. The measurement circuit is also shown in Fig. \[fig:Sample\](a). In the measurement of Josephson junction characteristics, we biased the junction in such a way that the averaged electric potential of the two Nb electrodes was kept at 0 V. Therefore, when the hole current is injected from the gate electrode, the corresponding current is extracted via both of two Nb electrodes. From the preliminary Hall measurement at 0.3 K, the carrier density and carrier mobility in the n-InGaAs layer were obtained as 1.4 $\times$ 10$^{19}$ cm$^{-3}$ and 1.6 $\times$ 10$^3$ cm$^2$/Vs, respectively, and we consider both of these values saturated in the low-temperature limit. Since the mean free path ($\ell$) and the thermal coherence length ($\xi_N$) at 30 mK are estimated to be $\sim$75 nm and $\sim$1.25 $\mu$m, the Josephson junction can be considered as [*dirty*]{} and [*short*]{} ($\ell < L < \xi_N$).
Results and Discussion
======================
![(a)p-n junction characteristics of superconductor-based LED. The main panel and the inset are semilog plot and linear plot, respectively. (b) Josephson junction characteristics of superconductor-based LED with the gate voltage ($V_G$) of 0 V.[]{data-label="fig:Junction"}](Fig2.eps){width="0.8\linewidth"}
Figure \[fig:Junction\](a) shows the injected hole current ($I_G$) as a function of applied gate voltage ($V_G$). Steady current injection of $I_G =$ 1.6 pA starts at $V_G =$ 0.78 V. Although we obtain the typical p-n junction diode characteristics $I_G \sim \exp (eV_G / \eta k_B T)$ with a non-ideal coefficient $\eta \sim$ 7.7 $\times$10$^3$, the tendency of saturation can be observed at $I_G \gtrsim$ 10 nA. The hysteretic current - voltage characteristics of the Josephson junction with $V_G =$ 0 V are shown in Fig. \[fig:Junction\](b). The superconducting critical current ($I_c$) and the normal resistance ($R_n$) defined in sufficiently large current range, were 0.58 $\mu$A and 380 $\Omega$, respectively. With the increasing temperature upto 160 mK, $I_c$ declined as $\sim T^{-1/4}$ while $R_n$ took a constant value. When we applied the gate voltage ($V_G$), both $I_c$ and $R_n$ were found to be changed as shown in Fig. \[fig:IcRnNqNp\](a), which we will discuss in the following.
![(a)Superconducting critical current ($I_c$) and normal resistance ($R_n$) as functions of gate voltage ($V_G$). Fitting results in no gate-controlled region are represented by lines. (b) Estimated quasiparticle density ($n_q$) and pair density ($n_p$) in the active layer as functions of injected current ($I_G$). Arrows in the left vertical axis indicate the values of no injection limit.[]{data-label="fig:IcRnNqNp"}](Fig3.eps){width="0.8\linewidth"}
In the gate-controlled region of $V_G <$ 0.78 V, where we do not observe steady current injection, a depletion layer remains at the boundary of p-InP - n-InGaAs heterostructure. In this region, we succeeded the quantitative explanation of the behavior of Josephson junction characteristics ($I_c$ and $R_n$) by taking into account the depletion layer thickness modulated by the gate voltage ($V_G$). The critical current ($I_c$) and the normal resistance ($R_n$) can be written as follows in [*dirty*]{} and [*short*]{} junctions using the effective mass ($m^\ast$) and mobility ($\mu$) of carrier [@Tinkham]: $$\begin{aligned}
I_c &=& \frac{e n_p \hbar}{m^\ast} \frac{W (H-x(V_G))}{L} , \nonumber \\
R_n &=& R_0 + \frac{1}{en_q\mu} \frac{L}{W (H-x(V_G))} .
\label{eqn:IcRn}\end{aligned}$$ Here, $L$ (150 nm), $H$ (40 nm) and $W$ are the length, thickness and width of the junction, and $n_q$ and $n_p$ are the quasiparticle density and superconducting pair density, respectively. As for the depletion layer thickness at the boundary of heterostructure ($x(V_G)$), we assumed the standard functional form of $x(V_G)=x(0)(1-V_G/V_i)^{1/2}$. By the fitting shown in Fig. \[fig:IcRnNqNp\](a) and the values of carrier density and carrier mobility in the n-InGaAs layer estimated from the Hall measurement, we obtained $W$=1.02 $\mu$m, $R_0$=360.8 $\Omega$, $x(0)$=17.8 nm and $V_i$=0.7 V. The effective width of junction $W$ (1.02 $\mu$m) is significantly smaller than the geometrical width of junction $W_0$ (20 $\mu$m), which implies that the supercurrent flows only through narrow paths in the n-InGaAs layer. Using the interfacial resistance ($R_0$), we defined the channel resistance ($R_{\rm Ch}$) as $R_{\rm Ch} \equiv R_n - R_0$ and investigated the $I_c R_{\rm Ch}$ product, which is expected to be independent of junction dimensions ($L$, $W$ and $H-x(V_G)$) and proportional to the ratio of carrier densities ($I_c R_{\rm Ch} = (\hbar / m^\ast \mu) (n_p / n_q)$) from Eq. (\[eqn:IcRn\]). The obtained $I_c R_{\rm Ch}$ product took a constant value of 10 $\mu$V in the gate-controlled region, which quantitatively supports our description of the direct modulation of channel cross-sectional area by the gate voltage. This description can be regarded as a new-type JoFET, and we emphasize the difference from the conventional JoFET [@AkazakiAPL] where the carrier density in semiconductor (normal conductor) is modulated by the gate voltage. The estimated value of superconducting pair density $n_p$ (3.4 $\times$ 10$^{15}$ cm$^{-3}$) is comparable to those estimated in other superconductor-based LEDs [@SuemuneAPEx].
When the steady current injection takes place in the current-injected region of $V_G \geq$ 0.78 V, both of $I_c$ and $R_n$ decrease. We note that the magnitude of injected current ($I_G$) is several orders smaller than the modulated superconducting critical current ($I_c$). Therefore, the mechanism of this ultrahigh monitoring sensitivity is substantially different from those in conventional carrier-injected devices [@SchapersAPL; @BaselmansNature], and can be considered to reflect the radiative recombination process, which characterizes the superconductor-based LEDs with strong light-confinement. In fact, we cannot explain the behaviors of Josephson junction characteristics ($I_c$ and $R_n$) in small current injection region of $I_G \lesssim$ 10 nA by the increase of effective temperature of quasiparticle - pair system in the n-InGaAs active layer because $R_n$ takes constant value in the temperature range less than 160 mK. If we take into account the fact that the depletion layer does not exist in this region ($x(V_G) = 0$) and reconsider Eq. (\[eqn:IcRn\]), the carrier density in the n-InGaAs active layer ($n_q$ and $n_p$) are found to be the only variables that can explain the behaviors of $R_n$ and $I_c$. Figure \[fig:IcRnNqNp\](b) shows $n_q$ and $n_p$ estimated from Eq. (\[eqn:IcRn\]) as functions $I_G$.
First, it is noteworthy that the sum $(n_q + 2n_p)$ increases with $I_G$ in all current-injected region. Considering the charge neutrality condition, this increase indicates that the energy of conduction band for electrons in the n-InGaAs active layer is pulled down with respect to vacuum by the current injection. This also means that the energy of valence band for holes is pulled up, which is implied by the tendency of saturation shown in Fig. \[fig:Junction\](a). We also note that both $n_q$ and $n_p$ do not show the tendency toward saturation in the limit of $I_G \rightarrow 0$, the values of which are indicated by arrows in the left vertical axis of Fig. \[fig:IcRnNqNp\](b).
![Schematic diagram of quasiparticles and superconducting pairs.[]{data-label="fig:Cycle"}](Fig4b.eps){width="0.7\linewidth"}
Using the flow diagram of quasiparticles and superconducting pairs schematically shown in Fig. \[fig:Cycle\], we discuss the carrier flow in the superconductor-based LED and explain the mechanism of the ultrahigh monitoring sensitivity for radiative recombination process. Because the total charge conserves in the energy relaxation process in succession to the photon absorption, current with an amount exactly equal to $I_G$ is required to be extracted from the n-InGaAs active layer to the Nb electrodes in the steady state. This means that the carriers flow into the conduction band of the n-InGaAs layer to compensate the carrier loss caused by the recombination process. We define $I_q$ and $I_p$ as the current carried by quasiparticles and pairs, and represent the steady state condition as $$I_q + I_p = I_G \equiv I_G^{(q)} + I_G^{(p)}.
\label{eqn:neutrality}$$ Here $I_G^{(q)}$ and $I_G^{(p)}$ are the components of injected hole current ($I_G$) that recombine with quasiparticles and pairs corresponding to their recombination rates.
In addition to the inflow of carriers ($I_q$ and $I_p$), the hole current injection causes large disturbance in the quasiparticle - pair system via radiative recombination and immediate absorption of generated photons, and promotes the conversion from pairs to quasiparticles. If we put the current corresponding to the conversion rate as $i$, the following condition is also required in the steady state: $$0 = I_G^{(q)} - I_q - i = I_G^{(p)} - I_p + i.
\label{eqn:steady}$$ (We define the positive direction of $i$ as the flowing direction from quasiparticle subsystem to pair subsystem taking into account that the carrier charge is negative.)
Generally speaking, the conversion rate from quasiparticles to pairs ($i$) depends not only on the injected current ($I_G$) but also on the carrier density ($n_q$ and $n_p$). However, in the small current injection region of $I_G \lesssim$ 10 nA, we can assume that the energy relaxation process of absorbed photons dominantly proceeds with the destruction of superconducting pairs and put $i \approx \alpha I_G$. Here the proportional constant $\alpha$ is approximately equal to the ratio of the photon energy ($\hbar \omega_{\rm op} \sim$ 0.86 eV) to the superconducting pairing energy (${\tilde \Delta}_N \sim$ 1.5 meV in Nb), i.e. $\alpha \approx \hbar \omega_{\rm op} / {\tilde \Delta}_N$. After solving Eqs. (\[eqn:neutrality\]) and (\[eqn:steady\]) with respect to $I_q$ and $I_p$, and taking into account that $\alpha \gg 1$, we obtain $$\begin{aligned}
I_q &=& -(\alpha -1) I_G^{(q)} - \alpha I_G^{(p)} \approx - \alpha I_G , \nonumber \\
I_p &=& \alpha I_G^{(q)} + (\alpha +1) I_G^{(p)} \approx \alpha I_G .\end{aligned}$$ That is, in order to compensate the conversion from pairs to quasiparticles inside the n-InGaAs active layer, the superconducting pairs flow [*into*]{} the n-InGaAs layer ($I_p>0$) while the quasiparticles flow [*out of*]{} ($I_q<0$). (To be accurate, the outflow of quasiparticles is a little larger than the inflow of pairs and the steady state condition is secured including the injected hole current.) Both $\vert I_q \vert$ and $\vert I_p \vert$ are larger than $I_G$ by the factor of $\alpha \gg 1$, which results in the high sensitivity of Josephson characteristics for monitoring the radiative recombination process.
The values of $n_q$ and $n_p$ in steady state are determined as the balance points in the carrier flow. Because the superconducting pair potential is sufficiently small, the reformation of pairs inside the n-InGaAs layer is negligible and the pairs lost in the energy relaxation process are compensated only by the inflow of pairs from Nb electrodes ($I_p$). In the Nb superconducting electrodes, the discrepancy of chemical potentials in quasiparticle - pair system takes place in order to sustain the reformation rate necessary for the compensation, which also means the nonequilibrium superconductivity in the Nb electrodes. Due to the large interfacial barriers at Nb electrodes ($R_0$), it is difficult to estimate the carrier density in the Nb electrodes ($n_q^{\rm (Nb)}$ and $n_p^{\rm (Nb)}$) directly from those in the n-InGaAs active layer ($n_q$ and $n_p$). However, we can say that the sudden decrease of $n_p$ in the region of $I_G \lesssim$ 10 nA reflects the decrease of $n_p^{\rm (Nb)}$ caused by the rate-limiting reformation.
When the injected current is increased ($I_G \gtrsim$ 10 nA), we cannot ignore the recombination process involving quasiparticles in addition to various energy relaxation processes of absorbed photons other than the destruction of superconducting pairs. Moreover, the effective temperature of quasiparticle - pair system in the n-InGaAs active layer is increased, which causes not only the damping of the compensation cycle but also the suppression of $I_c$ itself. These effects result in the gradual decrease of the current amplification factor ($\alpha$), and eventual break down of the flow model described in Fig. \[fig:Cycle\]. Especially in the region of $I_G \gtrsim$ 0.3 $\mu$A, the transport measurements of Josephson junction characteristics under the steady current injection become difficult whereas the spectrally-integrated EL intensity reaches the sensitivity of our optical measurement system as is shown in Fig. \[fig:Sample\](c). The injected current ($I_G$) comparable with the superconducting critical current ($I_c$) causes asymmetric distortion of current - voltage curve which is due to the small difference in the transparency of interfaces at the two Nb electrodes.
Conclusion
==========
In conclusion, we characterized superconductor-based LED in strong light-confinement regime as a superconductor-based three-terminal device, and quantitatively investigated its transport properties ($I_c$ and $R_n$). In the gate-controlled region, we confirmed the realization of new-type JoFET performance, where the channel cross-sectional area of the junction is directly modulated by the gate voltage. In the current-injected region, the superconducting critical curren of $\mu$A order was found to be modulated by the steady current injection of pA order. We explained this ultrahigh monitoring sensitivity for radiative recombination process by taking into account the conversion of superconducting pairs to quasiparticles in the energy relaxation of absorbed photons, and discuss the carrier flows together with the nonequilibrium superconductivity, both of which take place for compensating the conversion.
We appreciate Dr. S. Kim for fruitful discussion.
[99]{} Y. Asano, I. Suemune, H. Takayanagi and E. Hanamura, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**103**]{}, 187001 (2009). P. Recher, Y. V. Nazarov and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**104**]{}, 156802 (2010). F. Godschalk, F. Hassler and Y. V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**107**]{}, 073901 (2011). Y. Hayashi, K. Tanaka, T. Akazaki, M. Jo, H. Kumano and I. Suemune, Appl. Phys. Express [**1**]{} 011701 (2008). I. Suemune, Y. Hayashi, S. Kuramitsu, K. Tanaka, T. Akazaki, H. Sasakura, R. Inoue, H. Takayanagi, Y. Asano, E. Hanamura, S. Odashima and H. Kumano, Appl. Phys. Express [**3**]{} 054001 (2010). H. Sasakura, S. Kuramitsu, Y. Hayashi, K. Tanaka, T. Akazaki, E. Hanamura, R. Inoue, H. Takayanagi, Y. Asano, C. Hermannst[" a]{}dter, H. Kumano and I. Suemune, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**107**]{}, 157403 (2011). I. Suemune, H. Sasakura, Y. Hayashi, K. Tanaka, T. Akazaki, Y. Asano, R. Inoue, H. Takayanagi, E. Hanamura, J. -H. Huh, C. Hermannst[" a]{}dter, S. Odashima and H. Kumano, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. [**51**]{}, 010114 (2012). R. Inoue, H. Takayanagi, T. Akazaki, K. Tanaka and I. Suemune, Supercond. Sci. Tech. [**10**]{}, 034025 (2010). T. Akazaki, H. Takayanagi, J. Nitta and T. Enoki, Appl. Phys. Lett. [**68**]{}, 418 (1996). T. Sch[" a]{}pers, J. Malindretos, K. Neurohr, S. G. Lachenmann, A. van der Hart, G. Crecelius, H. Hardtdegen, H. L[" u]{}th, M. Behet and A. A. Gollubov, Appl. Phys. Lett. [**73**]{}, 2348 (1998). J. J. A. Baselmans, A. F. Morpurgo, B. J. van Wees and T. M. Klapwijk, Nature [**397**]{}, 43 (1999). M. Tinkham, [*Introduction to Superconductivity: Second Edition*]{}, Dover Books (2004).
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: |
We report on observations of the pulsar / Be star binary system [PSRJ2032+4127 / MT91213]{} in the energy range between $100{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ GeV}}}$ and $20{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ TeV}}}$ with the VERITAS and MAGIC imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescope arrays. The binary orbit has a period of approximately 50 years, with the most recent periastron occurring on 2017 November 13. Our observations span from 18 months prior to periastron to one month after. A new, point-like, gamma-ray source is detected, coincident with the location of [PSRJ2032+4127 / MT91213]{}. The gamma-ray light curve and spectrum are well-characterized over the periastron passage. The flux is variable over at least an order of magnitude, peaking at periastron, thus providing a firm association of the TeV source with the pulsar / Be star system. Observations prior to periastron show a cutoff in the spectrum at an energy around $0.5{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ TeV}}}$. This result adds a new member to the small population of known TeV binaries, and it identifies only the second source of this class in which the nature and properties of the compact object are firmly established.
We compare the gamma-ray results with the light curve measured with the X-ray Telescope (XRT) on board the Neil Gehrels *Swift* Observatory and with the predictions of recent theoretical models of the system. We conclude that significant revision of the models is required to explain the details of the emission we have observed, and we discuss the relationship between the binary system and the overlapping steady extended source, [TeVJ2032+4130]{}.
author:
- 'A. U. Abeysekara'
- 'W. Benbow'
- 'R. Bird'
- 'A. Brill'
- 'R. Brose'
- 'J. H. Buckley'
- 'A. J. Chromey'
- 'M. K. Daniel'
- 'A. Falcone'
- 'J. P. Finley'
- 'L. Fortson'
- 'A. Furniss'
- 'A. Gent'
- 'G. H. Gillanders'
- 'D. Hanna'
- 'T. Hassan'
- 'O. Hervet'
- 'J. Holder'
- 'G. Hughes'
- 'T. B. Humensky'
- 'P. Kaaret'
- 'P. Kar'
- 'M. Kertzman'
- 'D. Kieda'
- 'M. Krause'
- 'F. Krennrich'
- 'S. Kumar'
- 'M. J. Lang'
- 'T. T. Y. Lin'
- 'G. Maier'
- 'P. Moriarty'
- 'R. Mukherjee'
- 'S. O’Brien'
- 'R. A. Ong'
- 'A. N. Otte'
- 'N. Park'
- 'A. Petrashyk'
- 'M. Pohl'
- 'E. Pueschel'
- 'J. Quinn'
- 'K. Ragan'
- 'G. T. Richards'
- 'E. Roache'
- 'I. Sadeh'
- 'M. Santander'
- 'S. Schlenstedt'
- 'G. H. Sembroski'
- 'I. Sushch'
- 'J. Tyler'
- 'V. V. Vassiliev'
- 'S. P. Wakely'
- 'A. Weinstein'
- 'R. M. Wells'
- 'P. Wilcox'
- 'A. Wilhelm'
- 'D. A. Williams'
- 'T. J Williamson'
- 'B. Zitzer'
- 'V. A. Acciari'
- 'S. Ansoldi'
- 'L. A. Antonelli'
- 'A. Arbet Engels'
- 'D. Baack'
- 'A. Babić'
- 'B. Banerjee'
- 'U. Barres de Almeida'
- 'J. A. Barrio'
- 'J. Becerra González'
- 'W. Bednarek'
- 'E. Bernardini'
- 'A. Berti'
- 'J. Besenrieder'
- 'W. Bhattacharyya'
- 'C. Bigongiari'
- 'A. Biland'
- 'O. Blanch'
- 'G. Bonnoli'
- 'G. Busetto'
- 'R. Carosi'
- 'G. Ceribella'
- 'S. Cikota'
- 'S. M. Colak'
- 'P. Colin'
- 'E. Colombo'
- 'J. L. Contreras'
- 'J. Cortina'
- 'S. Covino'
- 'V. D’Elia'
- 'P. Da Vela'
- 'F. Dazzi'
- 'A. De Angelis'
- 'B. De Lotto'
- 'M. Delfino'
- 'J. Delgado'
- 'F. Di Pierro'
- 'E. Do Souto Espiñera'
- 'A. Domínguez'
- 'D. Dominis Prester'
- 'D. Dorner'
- 'M. Doro'
- 'S. Einecke'
- 'D. Elsaesser'
- 'V. Fallah Ramazani'
- 'A. Fattorini'
- 'A. Fernández-Barral'
- 'G. Ferrara'
- 'D. Fidalgo'
- 'L. Foffano'
- 'M. V. Fonseca'
- 'L. Font'
- 'C. Fruck'
- 'D. Galindo'
- 'S. Gallozzi'
- 'R. J. García López'
- 'M. Garczarczyk'
- 'S. Gasparyan'
- 'M. Gaug'
- 'P. Giammaria'
- 'N. Godinović'
- 'D. Guberman'
- 'D. Hadasch'
- 'A. Hahn'
- 'J. Herrera'
- 'J. Hoang'
- 'D. Hrupec'
- 'S. Inoue'
- 'K. Ishio'
- 'Y. Iwamura'
- 'H. Kubo'
- 'J. Kushida'
- 'D. Kuveždić'
- 'A. Lamastra'
- 'D. Lelas'
- 'F. Leone'
- 'E. Lindfors'
- 'S. Lombardi'
- 'F. Longo'
- 'M. López'
- 'A. López-Oramas'
- 'B. Machado de Oliveira Fraga'
- 'C. Maggio'
- 'P. Majumdar'
- 'M. Makariev'
- 'M. Mallamaci'
- 'G. Maneva'
- 'M. Manganaro'
- 'K. Mannheim'
- 'L. Maraschi'
- 'M. Mariotti'
- 'M. Martínez'
- 'S. Masuda'
- 'D. Mazin'
- 'M. Minev'
- 'J. M. Miranda'
- 'R. Mirzoyan'
- 'E. Molina'
- 'A. Moralejo'
- 'V. Moreno'
- 'E. Moretti'
- 'P. Munar-Adrover'
- 'V. Neustroev'
- 'A. Niedzwiecki'
- 'M. Nievas Rosillo'
- 'C. Nigro'
- 'K. Nilsson'
- 'D. Ninci'
- 'K. Nishijima'
- 'K. Noda'
- 'L. Nogués'
- 'M. Nöthe'
- 'S. Paiano'
- 'J. Palacio'
- 'D. Paneque'
- 'R. Paoletti'
- 'J. M. Paredes'
- 'G. Pedaletti'
- 'P. Peñil'
- 'M. Peresano'
- 'M. Persic'
- 'P. G. Prada Moroni'
- 'E. Prandini'
- 'I. Puljak'
- 'J. R. Garcia'
- 'W. Rhode'
- 'M. Ribó'
- 'J. Rico'
- 'C. Righi'
- 'A. Rugliancich'
- 'L. Saha'
- 'N. Sahakyan'
- 'T. Saito'
- 'K. Satalecka'
- 'T. Schweizer'
- 'J. Sitarek'
- 'I. Šnidarić'
- 'D. Sobczynska'
- 'A. Somero'
- 'A. Stamerra'
- 'M. Strzys'
- 'T. Surić'
- 'F. Tavecchio'
- 'P. Temnikov'
- 'T. Terzić'
- 'M. Teshima'
- 'N. Torres-Albà'
- 'S. Tsujimoto'
- 'J. van Scherpenberg'
- 'G. Vanzo'
- 'M. Vazquez Acosta'
- 'I. Vovk'
- 'M. Will'
- 'D. Zarić'
title: 'Periastron observations of TeV gamma-ray emission from a binary system with a 50-year period'
---
Introduction {#sec:intro}
============
TeV gamma-ray emitting binary systems are extremely rare objects, likely corresponding to a relatively brief period in the evolution of some massive star binaries [@2017AnA...608A..59D]. They consist of a neutron star or black hole in a binary orbit with a massive star, and their high-energy emission provides a unique opportunity to study relativistic particle acceleration in a continuously changing physical environment. Of particular interest are systems where the compact object is a pulsar, since the pulsed emission firmly identifies the nature of the compact object, and provides an accurate determination of the orbital parameters, the available energy budget, and the likely acceleration mechanism. Prior to this work, only one TeV binary with a known pulsar had been detected: the pulsar / Be-star binary system PSRB1259-63 / LS2883 . In this paper, we present the discovery of a second member of this class, PSRJ2032+4127 / MT91213.
Pulsed emission, with a period of $P=143{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ ms}}}$, was first detected from [PSRJ2032+4127]{} in a blind search of *Fermi*-LAT gamma-ray data [@2009Sci...325..840A] and was subsequently detected in radio observations with the Green Bank Telescope [@2009ApJ...705....1C]. These observations revealed dramatic changes in the pulsar spin-down rate, an effect most easily explained by Doppler shift due to the pulsar’s motion in a long-period binary system [@2015MNRAS.451..581L]. The pulsar’s companion was identified as a B0Ve star, MT91213, which has a mass of around 15${\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ M_\odot}}}$ and a circumstellar disk which varies in radius by more than a factor of two, from $0.2{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ AU}}}$ to $0.5{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ AU}}}$ [@2017MNRAS.464.1211H]. The pulsar spin-down luminosity ($\dot{\mathrm{E}}$) is $1.7\times 10^{35}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ erg}}}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ s^{-1}}}} $, with a characteristic age of 180[$\mathrm{\ kyr}$]{}, and the system lies at a distance of 1.4–1.7${\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ kpc}}}$, in the Cyg OB2 stellar association. Further observations refined the orbital parameters, yielding a binary period of 45–50 years, an eccentricity between 0.94 and 0.99, and a longitude of periastron between 21and 52. Periastron occurred on 2017 November 13 with a separation between [PSRJ2032+4127]{} and [MT91213]{} of approximately 1 AU [@2017MNRAS.464.1211H; @2017ATel10920....1C].
Significant X-ray brightening from the direction of [PSRJ2032+4127]{} was first detected by @2017MNRAS.464.1211H, with the X-ray flux increasing by a factor of twenty relative to 2010 measurements. @2017ApJ...843...85L used data from *Chandra*, *Swift*-XRT, *NuSTAR*, and *XMM-Newton* to conduct a detailed study of the long-term light curve, finding variability on timescales of weeks on top of the long-term increasing trend, which they attributed to clumps in the stellar wind. The structure of the stellar wind was further explored by @2018MNRAS.474L..22P, who used *Swift*-XRT observations to map the circumstellar environment of the Be star. Recently, @2018ApJ...857..123L presented detailed *Swift*, *Fermi*-LAT and radio observations of [PSRJ2032+4127]{} over the 2017 periastron period. They report strong variability in the X-ray flux, but no variability in the GeV gamma-ray flux, likely because this is masked by magnetospheric emission from the pulsar.
[PSRJ2032+4127]{} lies at the edge of the steady, extended, very-high-energy (VHE, $E>100{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ GeV}}}$) gamma-ray source, [TeVJ2032+4130]{}. This object was the first VHE source to be serendipitously discovered, by HEGRA , and was not associated with any counterpart at other wavelengths. Subsequent observations by HEGRA and MAGIC revealed an extended object, with a width of approximately 6 and a hard power-law spectrum ($\Gamma\sim2.0$) . VERITAS observations have shown that the extended emission is asymmetric and coincident with a void in radio emission [@2014ApJ...783...16A]. Prior to the discovery of its binary nature, an association of [TeVJ2032+4130]{} with the pulsar wind nebula (PWN) of PSRJ2032+4127 seemed the most likely origin for the VHE source.
Thus far, only a handful of VHE gamma-ray emitting binary systems have been detected, of which only PSRB1259-63 / LS2883 has an identified compact object: a pulsar in a highly elliptical ($e=0.87$) orbit with a period of 3.4 years and a periastron separation of about $1{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ AU}}}$ [@1992ApJ...387L..37J; @2011ApJ...732L..11N]. The unpulsed radio, X-ray and VHE gamma-ray fluxes show complex light curves, with the majority of the emission occurring close to periastron in two distinct peaks, likely related to the pulsar passage through the circumstellar decretion disk. High-energy (HE, $0.1{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ GeV}}}<E<100{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ GeV}}}$) emission, conversely, is generally weak around periastron, followed by intense flaring episodes which occur typically more than 30, and as long as 70, days after periastron [@2011ApJ...736L..11A; @2018ApJ...863...27J].
In this paper, we report on the results of extensive VHE gamma-ray observations of the 2017 periastron passage of the [PSRJ2032+4127 / MT91213]{} system using VERITAS and MAGIC, as well as presenting contemporaneous X-ray observations with *Swift*-XRT.
Observations and Analysis {#sec:observations}
=========================
VHE gamma-ray observations of [PSRJ2032+4127 / MT91213]{} were conducted by the MAGIC and VERITAS imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescope arrays, which are sensitive to astrophysical gamma rays above $50{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ GeV}}}$. MAGIC consists of two 17m-diameter telescopes, located at the observatory of El Roque de Los Muchachos on the island of La Palma, Spain, whereas VERITAS is an array of four 12m-diameter telescopes at the Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory near Tucson, Arizona. The observatories and their capabilities are described in @Aleksic2016 (MAGIC) and @2015ICRC...34..771P (VERITAS), and references therein.
In this paper, we present the results of 181.3 hours of observations with VERITAS (51.6 hours of archival data taken before 2016, 30.1 hours between 2016 September and 2017 June, 99.6 hours between 2017 September and December) and 87.9 hours of observations with MAGIC (53.7 hours between 2016 May and September and 34.2 hours between 2017 June and December). Observations were conducted in “wobble” mode, with the source location offset from the center of the field-of-view, allowing simultaneous evaluation of the background [@Fomin94]. The data were analyzed using standard tools [@Zanin13; @2017arXiv170804048M], in which Cherenkov images are first calibrated, cleaned and parameterized [@Hillas85], then used to reconstruct the energy and arrival direction of the incident gamma ray, and to reject the majority of the cosmic ray background [@magic:RF; @2006APh....25..380K].
A total of 186 *Swift*-XRT [@2005SSRv..120..165B] observations were taken between 2008 June 16 and 2018 April 15, equating to 136.4 hours of live time. The data were collected in photon-counting mode and analyzed using the HEAsoft analysis package version 6.24[^1]. The background was estimated from five regions equidistant from [PSRJ2032+4127]{}, and the flux was calculated using XSPEC.
Variability, Morphology and Spectrum {#sec:results}
====================================
A new, spatially-unresolved, time-varying VHE gamma-ray source was detected at a position compatible with [PSRJ2032+4127 / MT91213]{}. The source is named [VERJ2032+414]{} and [MAGICJ2032+4127]{} in the VERITAS and MAGIC source catalogs, respectively. It is also spatially coincident with [TeVJ2032+4130]{}, the previously detected extended VHE source, but offset from the centroid of the extended emission by approximately $10\arcmin$.
The complete X-ray and gamma-ray light curves are shown in . Following the initial detection of [PSRJ2032+4127 / MT91213]{} in 2017 September by VERITAS and MAGIC [@2017ATel10810....1V] with a flux exceeding the baseline flux from [TeVJ2032+4130]{}, gamma-ray emission was observed to increase up to the time of periastron (2017 November 13; MJD 58070), reaching a factor of ten higher than the baseline. Approximately one week after periastron the flux sharply decreased, to a level compatible with the baseline emission, before recovering to the periastron level a few days later. Further observations were conducted after periastron, but the combination of low source elevation angle, poor weather conditions and rather brief exposure, resulted in a relatively poor flux measurement. In total, during the 2017 fall observations (MJD 57997–58110), VERITAS detected [PSRJ2032+4127 / MT91213]{} with a significance of 21.5 standard deviations ($\sigma$) and MAGIC with a significance of $19.5{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ \sigma}}}$.
shows skymaps for the complete fall 2017 VHE datasets, revealing overlapping emission from [TeVJ2032+4130]{} and [PSRJ2032+4127 / MT91213]{}. For both the VERITAS and MAGIC data we fit the gamma-ray excess maps with a two-component model, consisting of a bivariate Gaussian function to represent the extended source and a symmetrical Gaussian function to model the unresolved emission at the location of the binary. The parameters of the extended source model, indicated by the dashed ellipses in , were constrained to match those measured prior to the appearance of the binary. For MAGIC, the extended source has a semi-major axis of ${0\fdg125}\pm{0\fdg01}$ and a semi-minor axis of ${0\fdg08}\pm{0\fdg01}$, centered on R.A.=$20^\mathrm{h} 31^\mathrm{m} 39.7^\mathrm{s} \pm 2^\mathrm{s}$, Dec=$41\arcdeg 34\arcmin 23\arcsec \pm 20\arcsec$, at an angle of $34\arcdeg \pm 2\arcdeg$ east of north. For VERITAS, the extended source parameters are those reported in @2018ApJ...861..134A: semi-major and semi-minor axes of ${0\fdg19}\pm{0\fdg02}_{stat}\pm{0\fdg01}_{sys}$ and ${0\fdg08}\pm{0\fdg01}_{stat}\pm{0\fdg03}_{sys}$, centered on R.A.=$20^\mathrm{h} 31^\mathrm{m} 33^\mathrm{s}\pm 2^\mathrm{s}_\mathrm{stat}\pm 2^\mathrm{s}_\mathrm{sys}$, Dec=$41\arcdeg 34\arcmin 38\arcsec \pm36\arcsec_\mathrm{stat} \pm36\arcsec_\mathrm{sys}$, with an orientation of $41\arcdeg \pm{4\arcdeg}_{stat}\pm{1\arcdeg}_{sys}$ east of north. The centroid of the unresolved component is measured to be at R.A.=$20^\mathrm{h} 32^\mathrm{m} 10^\mathrm{s} \pm 2^\mathrm{s}_\mathrm{stat} \pm 2^\mathrm{s}_\mathrm{sys}$, Dec=$41\arcdeg 27\arcmin 34\arcsec \pm 16\arcsec_\mathrm{stat} \pm 26\arcsec_\mathrm{sys}$ for VERITAS, and R.A.=$20^\mathrm{h} 32^\mathrm{m} 7^\mathrm{s} \pm 2_\mathrm{stat}^\mathrm{s}$, Dec=$41\arcdeg 28\arcmin 4\arcsec \pm 20\arcsec_\mathrm{stat}$ for MAGIC, which are consistent, within the measured uncertainties, with the location of [PSRJ2032+4127 / MT91213]{} ($20^\mathrm{h} 32^\mathrm{m} 13.12^\mathrm{s} \pm 0.02^\mathrm{s} +41\arcdeg 27\arcmin 24.34\arcsec \pm 0.03\arcsec$; [@2018yCat.1345....0G]).
The source spectrum () is also formed of two emission components: steady, baseline emission from the extended source [TeVJ2032+4130]{} and variable emission associated with the binary system. Prior to 2017, only the baseline emission component was present, while the 2017 data include contributions from both the baseline and the variable binary. We performed a global spectral fit to the complete dataset, in which the pre-2017 observations were fit with a pure power-law for the baseline, and the 2017 data were fit with the same power-law, plus an additional component for the binary emission. Two models were tested for the binary emission: a pure power law and a power law with an exponential cutoff. The VERITAS data favor the cutoff model over the power law for the binary emission, with an F-test probability of 0.997 and a cutoff energy of $0.57\pm0.20{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ TeV}}}$. MAGIC observations also favor an exponential cutoff, with a probability of 0.993 and a cutoff energy of $1.40\pm0.97{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ TeV}}}$. Full details of the fit parameters are given in . We note that the only other gamma-ray binary to display a spectral cutoff in the VHE regime is LS5039, with a cutoff at $8.7\pm2.0{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ TeV}}}$ in the VHE high state, close to inferior conjunction .
The fit process was then repeated with the 2017 data broken up into two periods, to search for spectral variation with orbital phase and/or flux state of the binary system. We define a high state (MJD 58057–58074 and 58080–58110), which covers the periods around periastron where the flux above 0.2 TeV was greater than 1.0$\times10^{-11}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ (approximately five times greater than the baseline flux from [TeVJ2032+4130]{}), and a low state, covering the 2017 observations prior to periastron (MJD 57928–58056). We performed a global fit to the datasets, with the high and low states fit with the baseline power law plus either a pure power law or a power-law with an exponential cutoff. The VERITAS data favor a cutoff model in the low state, with an F-test probability of 0.999 and a cutoff value of $0.33\pm0.13{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ TeV}}}$. MAGIC observations also favor a low-state cutoff model, with a probability of 0.980 and a cutoff value of $0.58\pm0.33{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ TeV}}}$. For both observatories, the high-state data are well-fit by a pure power law and including a cutoff does not significantly change the quality of the fit.
[lccccccc]{} & Pre-2017& **PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$** & (8.78 $\pm$ 2.56) $\times 10^{-15}$ & 3.47 & 2.14 $\pm$ 0.53 & - &\
& Fall 2017& PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$ + **PL$_\mathrm{binary}$** & (1.53 $\pm$ 0.14) $\times 10^{-12}$ & 0.70 & 2.81 $\pm$ 0.09 & - &\
& Pre-2017& **PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$** & (7.62 $\pm$ 1.51) $\times 10^{-15}$ & 4.18 & 2.14 $\pm$ 0.29 & - &\
& Fall 2017& PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$ + **PLEC$_\mathrm{binary}$** & (8.04 $\pm$ 3.37) $\times 10^{-12}$ & 0.64 & 1.26 $\pm$ 0.45 & 0.57 $\pm$ 0.20 &\
& Pre-2017& **PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$** & (4.65 $\pm$ 1.18) $\times 10^{-15}$ & 4.98 & 2.14 $\pm$ 0.85 & - &\
&Low State& PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$ + **PL$_\mathrm{binary}$** & (8.12 $\pm$ 3.77) $\times 10^{-14}$ & 1.76 & 2.86 $\pm$ 0.11 & - &\
& High State& PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$ + **PL$_\mathrm{binary}$** & (9.69 $\pm$ 1.75) $\times 10^{-13}$ & 1.17 & 2.72 $\pm$ 0.15 & - &\
& Pre-2017& **PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$** & (1.23 $\pm$ 0.24) $\times 10^{-14}$ & 3.43 & 2.14 $\pm$ 0.28 & - &\
& Low State& PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$ + **PLEC$_\mathrm{binary}$** & (1.63 $\pm$ 1.12) $\times 10^{-11}$ & 0.56 & 0.65 $\pm$ 0.75 & 0.33 $\pm$ 0.13 &\
& High State& PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$ + **PL$_\mathrm{binary}$**& (1.45 $\pm$ 0.18) $\times 10^{-12}$ & 1.00 & 2.73 $\pm$ 0.15 & - &\
& Pre-2017& **PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$** & (1.26 $\pm$ 0.25) $\times 10^{-14}$ & 3.39 & 2.14 $\pm$ 0.28 & - &\
& Low State& PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$ + **PLEC$_\mathrm{binary}$** & (1.64 $\pm$ 1.12) $\times 10^{-11}$ & 0.56 & 0.65 $\pm$ 0.75 & 0.33 $\pm$ 0.13 &\
& High State& PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$ + **PLEC$_\mathrm{binary}$** & (1.20 $\pm$ 0.41) $\times 10^{-11}$ & 0.51 & 2.37 $\pm$ 0.50 & 2.39 $\pm$ 3.23 &\
&Pre-2017& **PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$** & $(2.04\pm0.63)\times 10^{-14}$&3.50&$2.23\pm0.17$&-&\
&Fall 2017& PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$ + **PL$_\mathrm{binary}$** & $(1.65\pm0.33)\times 10^{-12}$&0.70&$2.61\pm0.18$&-&\
&Pre-2017& **PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$** & $(2.20\pm0.64)\times 10^{-14}$&3.50&$2.17\pm0.26$&-&\
&Fall 2017& PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$ + **PLEC$_\mathrm{binary}$** & $(3.77\pm1.68)\times 10^{-12}$&0.70&$1.74\pm0.37$&$1.40\pm0.97$&\
&Pre-2017& **PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$** & $(2.30\pm0.67)\times 10^{-14}$&3.50&$2.15\pm0.19$&-&\
&Low State& PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$ + **PL$_\mathrm{binary}$** & $(9.84\pm3.41)\times 10^{-13}$&0.70&$2.57\pm0.26$&-&\
&High State& PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$ + **PL$_\mathrm{binary}$** & $(3.69\pm0.64)\times 10^{-12}$&0.70&$2.17\pm0.23$&-&\
&Pre-2017& **PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$** & $(2.63\pm0.60)\times 10^{-14}$&3.50&$2.06\pm0.17$&-&\
&Low State& PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$ + **PLEC$_\mathrm{binary}$** & $(5.11\pm3.61)\times 10^{-12}$&0.70&$1.55\pm0.61$&$0.58\pm0.33$&\
&High State& PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$ + **PL$_\mathrm{binary}$** & $(1.65\pm0.14)\times 10^{-12}$&0.70&$2.20\pm0.40$&-&\
& Pre-2017& **PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$** &\
& Low State& PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$ + **PLEC$_\mathrm{binary}$** &\
& High State& PL$_\mathrm{baseline}$ + **PLEC$_\mathrm{binary}$** &\
Discussion {#sec:discussion}
==========
[PSRJ2032+4127 / MT91213]{} is the second TeV gamma-ray binary system to be detected in which the nature of the compact object is clearly established. Non-thermal emission from these systems likely results from the interaction of the pulsar wind with the wind and/or disk of the Be star [@1997ApJ...477..439T; @1999APh....10...31K; @2013AnARv..21...64D]. Particles are accelerated at the shock which forms between the pulsar and Be star winds. These subsequently produce synchrotron emission from radio to X-ray bands and inverse Compton emission at TeV energies. Numerous competing factors play a role in creating and modulating the observed emission. These include the efficiency of inverse Compton production and the degree of photon-photon absorption, which both depend upon the geometrical properties of the system with respect to the line of sight and the intensity, wavelength and spatial distribution of target photon fields [@2005ApJ...634L..81B]. Additional factors include: the position of the pulsar in relation to structures in the stellar wind [@2018MNRAS.474L..22P]; the bulk motion and cooling of the post-shocked material ; the structure of the magnetic field around the star [@2005MNRAS.356..711S]; and the degree of magnetization of the pulsar wind, and its evolution with radial distance from the pulsar [@2009ApJ...702..100T]. Isotropized pair cascades, triggered by misaligned VHE photons which would not otherwise be observed, can also contribute to the emission [@1997AnA...322..523B; @2014JHEAp...3...18S]. Finally, interactions with the material and radiation of a circumstellar disk, the defining feature of the Be stellar class, may also modulate the X-ray and gamma-ray fluxes [@2008MNRAS.385.2279S].
Modeling the time-dependent broadband emission is therefore complex, and challenging. @2017ApJ...836..241T have presented a model which explains the increasing X-ray flux prior to periastron as the result of the radial dependence of the pulsar wind magnetization, and the X-ray suppression at periastron due to Doppler boosting effects caused by bulk motion of the post-shocked flow, naturally leading to an emission light curve which is asymmetric with respect to periastron. A recently revised version of their model predictions is given in @2018ApJ...857..123L, and also in . The model prediction matches the early part of the XRT light curve reasonably well, when scaled by a factor of 0.5, but is unable to reproduce the rapid brightening around MJD 58080, when [PSRJ2032+4127 / MT91213]{} was at superior conjunction. This feature may be explained, at least in part, by interaction of the pulsar with the circumstellar disk of the Be star, which could be confirmed by observations of radio pulsations during the periastron passage. Alternatively, as discussed in @2018MNRAS.474L..22P, it may be caused by geometrical effects associated with the orientation of the stellar disk with respect to the pulsar’s orbit.
@2018JPhG...45a5201B also calculated gamma-ray emission from the system, including a detailed treatment of the pair cascades triggered by the absorption of primary gamma rays, and the subsequent production of inverse Compton emission. They do not calculate a detailed light curve, but conclude that the binary emission may dominate the overall VHE flux, becoming comparable to, or exceeding, the steady flux from [TeVJ2032+4130]{} for a few weeks around periastron and superior conjunction. The predicted elevated flux close to periastron of $\sim1.6\times10^{-12}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ erg}}}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ cm^{-2}}}}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ s^{-1}}}}$ at $1{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ TeV}}}$ is similar to the high-state emission levels reported in this work. We also note that the VHE efficiency (L$_{>200{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ GeV}}}}$/$\dot{\mathrm{E}}=1.4\%$) for [PSRJ2032+4127 / MT91213]{} is approximately the same as that of PSRB1259-63 / LS2883. In contrast, the GeV efficiency of [PSRJ2032+4127 / MT91213]{} is significantly lower than that of PSRB1259-63 / LS2883, which can exceed 100% [@2018ApJ...857..123L; @2018ApJ...863...27J].
A distinctive feature observed in the VHE light curve is a sharp flux drop around seven days after periastron, lasting just a few days. As noted in @2017ApJ...836..241T, a similar dip has been seen in the lightcurve of PSRB1259-63 / LS2883, which @2017ApJ...837..175S attributed to photon-photon absorption. This effect is predicted to be strongest when both the interaction angle between the photons is optimal and when the gamma-ray photons pass through the densest photon field, which occurs around superior conjunction, 5–15 days after periastron for [PSRJ2032+4127 / MT91213]{}.
Based on the detailed sampling of the VHE and X-ray light curves reported here, coupled with the measurement of an unexpected low-energy spectral cutoff in the VHE low state, it is clear that the existing models will require significant revision. Analysis of the pulsar timing evolution over periastron will provide important additional input, including more accurate measurements of the system geometry. It will also allow for more sensitive searches for GeV emission in the *Fermi*-LAT data, with the dominant magnetospheric emission from the pulsar removed by a temporally-gated analysis.
Finally, it is interesting to reconsider the properties of the steady VHE source, [TeVJ2032+4130]{}, in the light of these results. As noted in @2014ApJ...783...16A, if we assume that [TeVJ2032+4130]{} is the pulsar wind nebula of [PSRJ2032+4127]{}, then [PSRJ2032+4127]{} is one of the oldest and weakest pulsars with a nebula seen in both X-ray and VHE gamma rays. In a recent population study, @2017arXiv170208280H derive empirical relations between VHE luminosity and pulsar spin-down energy, and also between PWN radius and characteristic age. For [PSRJ2032+4127]{}, these relations predict a radius of over $20{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ pc}}}$ (compared to a measured extent of $4.7\times2.0{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ pc}}}$), and a TeV luminosity (1 to 10 TeV) of $2\times10^{33}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ erg}}}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ s^{-1}}}}$ (compared to the measured value of $8\times10^{32}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ erg}}}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{\ s^{-1}}}}$). However, the measured properties of VHE PWN display a large intrinsic scatter, and the physical size of the nebula can be strongly modified by the local interstellar environment. We conclude that [PSRJ2032+4127]{} remains a plausible candidate for the power source driving [TeVJ2032+4130]{} and note that it may be worthwhile to search for extended TeV nebulae around other known TeV binary systems – although the formation of [TeVJ2032+4130]{} may only be possible due to the exceptionally long orbital period and large eccentricity of the binary system, which allows [PSRJ2032+4127]{} to spend much of its orbit effectively as an isolated pulsar.
X-ray and gamma-ray monitoring of [PSRJ2032+4127 / MT91213]{} will continue. PSRB1259-63 / LS2883 produces bright gamma-ray flares in the days and months after periastron, and it ejects rapidly moving plasma clumps generated by the interaction of the pulsar with the stellar disk [@2015ApJ...806..192P]. Similar phenomena may occur in the case of [PSRJ2032+4127 / MT91213]{}. The ongoing observing campaigns therefore provide a rare opportunity to completely sample the high-energy behavior of this system around periastron, which will not be repeated until approximately 2067.
VERITAS is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. National Science Foundation, the Smithsonian Institution, and by NSERC in Canada. We acknowledge the excellent work of the support staff at the Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory and at collaborating institutions in the construction and operation of VERITAS.
We acknowledge *Fermi* and *Swift* GI program grants 80NSSC17K0648 and 80NSSC17K0314.
The MAGIC Collaboration thanks the funding agencies and institutions listed in:
<https://magic.mpp.mpg.de/ack_201805>
Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., et al. 2009, Science, 325, 840 Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., et al. 2011, , 736, L11 Abeysekara, A. U., Archer, A., Aune, T., et al. 2018, , 861, 134 Aharonian, F., Akhperjanian, A., Beilicke, M., et al. 2002, , 393, L37 Aharonian, F., Akhperjanian, A., Beilicke, M., et al. 2005, , 431, 197 Aharonian, F., Akhperjanian, A. G., Bazer-Bachi, A. R., et al. 2006, , 460, 743 Aharonian, F., Akhperjanian, A. G., Aye, K.-M., et al. 2005, , 442, 1 Albert, J., Aliu, E., Anderhub, H., et al. 2008, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 588, 424 Albert, J., Aliu, E., Anderhub, H., et al. 2008, , 675, L25 Aleksi[ć]{}, J., Ansoldi, S., Antonelli, L. A. et al. 2016, Astroparticle Physics, 72, 76 Aliu, E., Aune, T., Behera, B., et al. 2014, , 783, 16 , [Robitaille]{}, T. P., [Tollerud]{}, E. J. et al. 2013, , 558, A33 Bednarek, W. 1997, , 322, 523 Bednarek, W., Banasi[ń]{}ski, P., & Sitarek, J. 2018, Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics, 45, 015201 B[ö]{}ttcher, M., & Dermer, C. D. 2005, , 634, L81 Brun, R. and Rademakers, F. 1997, Nucl. Inst. & Meth. in Phys. Res. A, 389, 81-86 Burrows, D.N., Hill, J.E., Nousek, J.A., et al. 2005, , 120, 165 Coe, M. J., Steele, I. A., Ho, W. C. G., et al. 2017, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 10920, Camilo, F., Ray, P. S., Ransom, S. M., et al. 2009, , 705, 1 Dubus, G. 2006, , 456, 801 Dubus, G. 2013, , 21, 64 Dubus, G., Guillard, N., Petrucci, P.-O., & Martin, P. 2017, , 608, A59 Fomin, V. P., Stepanian, A. A., Lamb, R. C. et al. 1994, Astroparticle Physics, 2, 137 Gaia Collaboration 2018, VizieR Online Data Catalog, I/345. H.E.S.S. Collaboration: Abdalla, H., et al. 2017, , 612, A2 Hillas A. M. 1985, in Proc. ICRC 1985, 3, 445 Ho, W. C. G., Ng, C.-Y., Lyne, A. G., et al. 2017, , 464, 1211 Johnston, S., Manchester, R. N., Lyne, A. G. et al. 1992, , 387, L37 Johnson, T. J., Wood, K. S., Kerr, M., et al. 2018, , 863, 27 Kirk, J. G., Ball, L., & Skj[æ]{}raasen, O. 1999, Astroparticle Physics, 10, 31 Krawczynski, H., Carter-Lewis, D. A., Duke, C., et al. 2006, Astroparticle Physics, 25, 380 Li, K. L., Kong, A. K. H., Tam, P. H. T., et al. 2017, , 843, 85 Li, K. L., Takata, J., Ng, C. W., et al. 2018, , 857, 123 Lyne, A. G., Stappers, B. W., Keith, M. J., et al. 2015, , 451, 581 Maier, G., & Holder, J. 2017, in Proc. ICRC 2017, PoS(ICRC2017)747 Negueruela, I., Rib[ó]{}, M., Herrero, A. et al. 2011, , 732, L11 Pavlov, G. G., Hare, J., Kargaltsev, O., Rangelov, B., & Durant, M. 2015, , 806, 192 Park, N., The VERITAS Collaboration 2015, in Proc. ICRC 2015, 34, 771 Petropoulou, M., Vasilopoulos, G., Christie, I. M., Giannios, D., & Coe, M. J. 2018, , 474, L22 Sierpowska-Bartosik, A., & Bednarek, W. 2008, , 385, 2279 , A. and [Bednarek]{}, W. 2005, , 356, 711 Sushch, I., & B[ö]{}ttcher, M. 2014, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 3, 18 Sushch, I., & van Soelen, B. 2017, , 837, 175 Takata, J., & Taam, R. E. 2009, , 702, 100 Takata, J., Tam, P. H. T., Ng, C. W., et al. 2017, , 836, 241 Tavani, M., & Arons, J. 1997, , 477, 439 VERITAS, & MAGIC Collaborations 2017, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 10810, 1 Zanin, R.,Carmona, E., Sitarek, J., et al. 2013, in Proc. ICRC 2013, id 773
[^1]: <https://heasarc.nasa.gov/lheasoft/>
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'Planetary nebulae retain the signature of the nucleosynthesis and mixing events that occurred during the previous AGB phase. Observational signatures complement observations of AGB and post-AGB stars and their binary companions. The abundances of the elements heavier than iron such as Kr and Xe in planetary nebulae can be used to complement abundances of Sr/Y/Zr and Ba/La/Ce in AGB stars, respectively, to determine the operation of the [*slow*]{} neutron-capture process (the $s$ process) in AGB stars. Additionally, observations of the Rb abundance in Type I planetary nebulae may allow us to infer the initial mass of the central star. Several noble gas components present in meteoritic stardust silicon carbide (SiC) grains are associated with implantation into the dust grains in the high-energy environment connected to the fast winds from the central stars during the planetary nebulae phase.'
bibliography:
- 'apj-jour.bib'
- 'library.bib'
---
Introduction
============
The evolutionary track of the life of a star of 2 [${M}_{\odot}$]{} after core H exhaustion proceeds to the red giant phase, until core He burning stars. After core He exhaustion, the star becomes a red giant again and climbs the asymptotic giant branch (AGB). During the AGB phase, the stars loses most of its envelope via strong stellar winds, until mainly the C-O degerate core is left, with a thin layer of H ($\sim 10^{-3}$ [${M}_{\odot}$]{}) still burning. At this point the star travels back in the H-R diagram towards hotter temperatures. If it becomes hot enough before all the material expelled in the previous AGB phase is dispersed, the UV photons from the central star illuminate the circumstellar material producing a planetary nebula. It follows that in planetary nebulae we observe the chemical abundances produced during the AGB phase.
During the AGB the structure of the star can be described by two components: the entended convective H-rich envelope and the compact core. The core is hot and dense, and nuclear reactions can occur there that produce and modify the chemical abundances. Two burning shells are present: the H and the He burning shells. These shells act alternately, with recurrent episodes of He burning driving convective motions (a thermal pulse, TP) in the whole region in-between the two shells (the intershell). As the star expands and cools down, H burning is extinguished, the TP ceases, and He continues to burn radiatively at the bottom of the intershell. At this point the base of the convective envelope may sink deep inside the intershell (third dredge-up, TDU) and carry to the stellar surface the products of H and He burning. After the TDU, He burning extinguishes and H burning starts up again. This cycle of H burning, TP, and TDU, repeats until the envelope mass is lost. The material brought to stellar surface is carried into the surroundings by the AGB winds and contributes to making up the chemical enrichment of the Galaxy. For reviews on AGB stars, see @herwig05 and @karakas14dawes.
Four main chemical signatures result from the AGB evolution:
1. [During the TPs, partial He burning makes carbon, and not much oxygen, in the intershell and stars in the mass range roughly 1.5 to 4 [${M}_{\odot}$]{}(depending on the initial composition) can eventually become the observed C-rich stars [see, e.g., the middle panels of Figs. 2-4 of @karakas16].]{}
2. [The base of the convective envelope can be hot enough to drive proton captures on the isotopes of the elements from C to Al (hot bottom burning, HBB). They transform, for example, C into N in stars of initial mass larger than roughly 4 [${M}_{\odot}$]{} [see, e.g., the bottom panels of Figs. 2-4 of @karakas16].]{}
3. [The ingestion of H-burning ashes in the TPs results in the production of specific rare isotopes, such as $^{19}$F and $^{22}$Ne [e.g., @lugaro04; @abia15].]{}
4. [Finally, AGB stars are the site of origin of half of the cosmic abundances of the elements heavier than iron, via the operation of the $slow$ neutron capture process (the $s$ process) in the intershell.]{}
The last of these four points will be discussed in more detail in the present paper, together with implications from the observations of planetary nebulae.
The $s$ process
---------------
Because of their high number of protons ($>$26) the elements heavier than Fe have a large Coulomb barrier and can be produced only by capturing neutrons. The $s$ process occurs typically in hydrostatic conditions at relatively low neutron densities (typical 10$^{8}$ n/cm$^{3}$, but up to 10$^{13}$ n/cm$^{3}$ in the more massive AGB stars). The path of neutron captures proceeds mostly through stable nuclei, since unstable nuclei decay to their corresponding isobar before they can capture another neutron.
![ Periodic table of the elements with the locations of the first, second and third $s$ process peaks marked along with the corresponding neutron numbers. Also highlighted are the noble gases Kr and Xe and the element Rb, which can be observed in planetary nebulae.[]{data-label="fig1"}](Figure1.pdf){width="3.4in"}
Along the path of stable nuclei, the flux of neutron captures encounters three [ *bottlenecks*]{} corresponding to the magic number of neutrons N = 50, 82, 126 (Fig. \[fig1\]). Nuclei with such numbers of neutrons are relatively more stable against neutron captures than other nuclei, and tend to accumulate until the neutron flux reaches a large enough value to make the probability of neutron captures on these nuclei significant. The total, time-integrated neutron flux is the crucial quantity that determines if the bottlenecks are bypassed and if the production flux can proceed to the next bottleneck. The bottleneck nuclei determine the final $s$-process distribution and correspond to the so-called first $s$-process peak – or [*light*]{} s-process elements ([*ls*]{}) with N=50, Sr, Y, Zr; second $s$-process peak – or [*heavy*]{} s-process elements ([*hs*]{}) with N=82, Ba, La, Ce; and third $s$-process peak at N=126 (Pb), which can only accumulate since the $s$-process path ends there. The traditional $s$-process [*indexes*]{} are defined as \[ls/Fe\]=(\[Sr/Fe\]+\[Y/Fe\]+\[Zr/Fe\])/3 and \[hs/Fe\]=(\[Ba/Fe\]+\[La/Fe\]+\[Ce/Fe\])/3; although other choices have also been used in the literature [see discussion in @lugaro12].
The $s$-process in AGB stars
----------------------------
In the intershell of AGB stars free neutron are produced by two reactions. The $^{13}$C($\alpha$,n)$^{16}$O reaction is the main neutron surce in AGB stars of mass lower than roughly 4 [${M}_{\odot}$]{}. A region rich in $^{13}$C, the $^{13}$C [*pocket*]{}, is assumed to form via mixing of protons from the envelope into the intershell at the deepest extent of the TDU [@gallino98; @goriely00; @lugaro03a; @cristallo09]. The protons react with the abundant $^{12}$C to produce $^{13}$C via $^{12}$C(p,$\gamma$)$^{13}$N($\beta^+$)$^{13}$C. The $^{13}$C pocket controls the total number of neutrons and thus the observed $s$-process distribution, i.e., the \[hs/ls\] ratio. The absolute $s$-process abundances \[ls/Fe\] and \[hs/Fe\] are controlled also by the TDU and other dilution effects. For example, binary transfer plays a crucial role in interpreting the data derived from an AGB star companion (a so-called [*extrinsic*]{} $s$-process enhanced star), rather than an AGB star itself (an [*intrinsic*]{} $s$-process enhanced star). Because both the formation of the $^{13}$C pockets and the effects of stellar rotation and magnetic fields on the neutron flux are very uncertain, observations of \[hs/ls\] represent one of a few viable ways to understand the $s$ process in low-mass AGB stars.
For AGB stars more massive than roughly 4 [${M}_{\odot}$]{}, the main source of neutrons is instead the $^{22}$Ne($\alpha$,n)$^{25}$Mg reaction, which operates at higher temperatures (above 300 MK) inside the convective TPs. This neutron source produces a lower total number of neutrons but a higher neutron density than the $^{13}$C source. As such, it controls the possible operation of branching points, introducing deviations from the main $s$-process path. For instance, the abundance ratio \[Rb/Zr\] is an indicator of the neutron density and of the activation of the $^{22}$Ne source. The production of Rb is much increased when the neutron magic isotope $^{87}$Rb (N=50) is reached by the $s$-process path via the activation of the branching points at the unstable $^{85}$Kr and $^{86}$Rb [@abia01; @vanraai12]. Large uncertainties are present in the operation of the $^{22}$Ne neutron source including the rate of the neutron source reaction, the efficiency of the TDU, and the mass loss rate in massive AGB stars. The difficulty in constraining the operation of this neutron source using observations is that the \[Rb/Zr\] ratio in massive AGB stars is highly dependent on the model atmosphere used to analyse the spectra [@zamora14]. Independent constraints are crucial to settle the question of how much Rb is produced by massive AGB stars.
New directions
==============
Observations of the elements heavier than Fe in planetary nebulae (see Sterling et al., these proceedings) provide us complementary indicators and independent constraints for the $s$-process in AGB stars. As it can be seen from Fig. \[fig1\] the noble gases Kr and Xe, which are observable in planetary nebulae, are located very close to the first and second $s$-process peaks, respectively. Interestingly, only a small fraction of the cosmic abundances of these noble gases are produced by the $s$-process in AGB stars [@arlandini99; @bisterzo14]: Xe is a typical element made by the $rapid$ neutron captures in explosive environments [@thielemann11]. Krypton, on the other hand, is mostly produced in massive stars by a multitude of processes, including the weak $s$ process and different explosive mechanisms [e.g., @roberts10; @pignatari16 and references therein].
Nevertheless, the $s$ process in AGB stars contributes roughly 30% and 15% of the solar Kr and Xe, respectively [@bisterzo14]. This production, although much lower in absolute terms, follows the production of the $s$-process first and second peaks. This means that effectively the $s$-process models predict \[Xe/Kr\] values comparable to \[hs/ls\] values. The observed \[Xe/Kr\] ratios in planetary nebulae can be used to further constrain the total number of free neutrons and consequently the C pocket [@sharpee07; @pignatari08]. Furthemore, Rb can be directly seen in planetary nebulae, providing us with a constrain on the initial mass of the parent star and the opportunity to disentangle the effects of hot bottom burning in massive AGB stars (potentially Rb-rich) and of [ *extra*]{} mixing in low-mass AGB stars (certainly Rb-poor) on the He and N excesses observed in Type I planetary nebulae.
![Figure adapted from @sterling16 (©AAS. Reproduced with permission) showing the comparison between abundances observed in two planetary nebulae (red and blue circle symbols, with error bars) and results from models of the $s$ process in AGB stars from the FRUITY database [@cristallo15] for different masses and metallicity \[Fe/H\]=$-$0.37. Also indicated are the location of the first and second $s$-process peaks, labelled as ls and hs, respectively. The green and black arrows on the right side of the figure measure the \[hs/ls\] and the \[Xe/Kr\] ratios, respectively, predicted by the 2 [${M}_{\odot}$]{} model. It can be seen that \[hs/ls\]$\simeq$\[Xe/Kr\].[]{data-label="fig2"}](Figure2.pdf){width="3.4in"}
From a preliminary analysis by [@pignatari08], the observations of the s-process \[Xe/Kr\] in PNe seem to be consistent with the theoretical predictions of AGB models. However, [@sterling16] (see Fig. \[fig2\]) show a mismatch between models and observations for Kr, with the observations being higher than the model predictions. This problem needs to be analyzed in more details, also in the light of the other independent s-process observations of noble gases available from meteoritic presolar silicon carbide (SiC) grains, which formed in the winds of C-rich AGB stars.
The record of planetary nebula processes in stardust SiC
--------------------------------------------------------
Meteoritic stardust SiC grains contain noble gases that carry the signature of processes occurring in AGB stars and planetary nebulae. One of the first evidences that most of these grains originated from the envelopes of C-rich AGB star comes from the composition of the noble gas Xe (left panel of Fig. \[fig3\]), which shows the indisputable signature of the $s$ process in AGB stars. The Xe isotopic ratios produced by the $s$ process are predominantly controlled by the neutron-capture cross sections of the different Xe isotopes, which strongly favour the production of Xe and Xe. These are the two Xe $s$-only isotopes that are shielded from $r$-process production by their isobars in Te and are predominantly produced by the $s$ process.
{height="6.5cm"} {height="6.5cm"}\
Very intriguing is the abundance trend of the different noble gases, He, Ne, Ar, Kr, and Xe with the size of the grains. Since noble gases are chemically inert, they are believed to have been incorporated in the SiC grains via an implantation process. @verchovsky04 analysed the data from [@lewis94] in the light of an implantation model and discovered that the two different patterns (highlighted in green and blue in Fig. \[fig4\]) can be reproduced by the models by varying the energy per nucleon, an input parameter of the model. A relatively low energy per nucleon, of the order of 0.5 keV, can reproduce the pattern observed in Xe. This energy can be associated with turbulence in the winds during the AGB phase, which have typical speeds of 10-30 km/s (the [*cold*]{} component, Table \[tab1\]). As a consequence, Xe atoms must have been implanted carrying the signature of the matter in the winds of the AGB star. On the other hand, a much higher energy per nucleon ($\simeq$40 keV) is required to reproduce the pattern observed in He, Ne, Ar. This is because if the atom has too much energy, it cannot be stopped inside small grains. Post-AGB/planetary nebula fast winds ($\simeq$700 km/s) can imprint such an energy in the noble gases atoms (the [*hot*]{} component, Table \[tab1\]). As a consequence, He, Ne, and Ar must have been implanted carrying the signature of matter in the post-AGB winds, the same winds invoked as one of the possible factors involved in the production of planetary nebulea. Finally, Kr is a mixute of the two components, some of it being implanted in the AGB phase, and some during the planetary nebula phase.
![Figure adapted from @verchovsky04 (©AAS. Reproduced with permission) and showing a comparison between the abundances of the different noble gases in meteoritic SiC as a function of the grain size [from @lewis94] and the implantation model. Two clearly different patterns can be identified: He, Ne, Ar, and Kr are most abundant in large grains (highlighted in green), Xe is most abundant in the small grains (highlighted in blue), while the Kr abundance is made by a mixture of the two patterns, i.e., the blue pattern can be obtained by subtracting the Kr green pattern from the total Kr.[]{data-label="fig4"}](Figure4.pdf){width="3.4in"}
[**Component**]{} [**cold**]{} [**hot**]{}
------------------------------- -------------- --------------------
Grain size ($\mu$m) $<1$ $>1$
He no$^1$ yes
Ne no$^1$ yes
Ar no$^1$ yes
Kr yes yes
Kr no$^2$ yes
Xe yes no$^3$
Energy/nucleon (keV) 0.5 40
Implantation winds AGB post-AGB
Wind speed (km/s) 10-30 700
AGB nucleosynthetic signature envelope intershell (final)
: Qualitive description of the two components of noble gases implanted in meteoritic SiC grains.[]{data-label="tab1"}
The question arises of why He, Ne and Ar show only the fast wind/planetary nebula component, Xe shows only the AGB wind component, and Kr shows them both. @verchovsky04 proposed that these signatures are due to the different ionisation energy of the noble gases, which decreases with the number of electrons: Xe has the lowest ($\simeq$ 12 eV) ionization energy, and He the highest ($\simeq$ 25 eV) ionisation energy. If we assume that the atoms must be ionized to be implanted in the grains, then their different ionization energies can fractionate their abundances.
From the observed isotopic ratios of the noble gases we can gather detailed information about the nucleosynthetic signature carried by the two components. The Xe isotopic ratios are matched by the composition predicted in the AGB winds (left panel of Fig. \[fig3\]). This is the mixture of $s$-process-rich intershell material carried to the envelope by the TDU during the whole AGB phase and the initial composition of the stars, close to the solar system composition. On the other hand, to match the nucleosynthetic signatures presented by He and Ne, and in particular the so-called Ne-E(H) component extremely enriched in Ne, almost pure intershell material is required, with no dilution by the original envelope material. Post-AGB winds can carry such almost pure signature only in the case some flavour of a late or very late TP occurred [@bloecker01], which affects $\sim$20% of the AGB population [e.g., @werner06]. It is possible that a nucleosynthetic signature such as that of the H-rich envelope is also present for He and Ne in the hot component, but, it is not seen because its abundance is much lower than that of the intershell in the late or very late TP scenario.
The Kr abundance shows both the cold and the hot components (as Kr may be ionised in both cases), while Kr shows only the fast wind/planetary nebula hot component. The most likely explanation is that the nucleosynthetic signature of the cold component carries a Kr but not a Kr excess, while the nucleosynthetic signature of the hot component carries both. The explanation for this difference lies in the fact that Kr is located on the main $s$-process path, while Kr is produced by the activation of the branching point at Kr, for neutron densities exceeding few $10^8$ n/cm$^3$. The hot component recorded in large grains points to high Kr/Kr ratios in the intershell (right panel of Fig. \[fig3\]). The stellar origin of such signature remains debated. Potential proposed explanations are models of metallicity lower than solar and either a higher efficiency of the activation of C pocket [@pignatari06] or the ingestion of the C pocket inside the TPs [@raut13], which can occur if the initial mass is lower than 1.5 [${M}_{\odot}$]{}. However, such models predict Sr and Ba isotopic ratios inconsistent with measurements of the same bulk and single SiC grains [@gallino97; @lugaro03b; @barzyk07; @avila13; @liu15]. The impact of convective-boundary mixing processes at the bottom of the convective thermal pulse [e.g., @lugaro03a; @battino16] needs to be also evaluated for Kr and Xe. Another possibility would be that the production of extra Kr occurs during the post-AGB phase in association with a late or a very late TP that is already required to carry to the stellar surface the almost pure intershell material seen in the hot component [e.g., as in the case of the [*intermediate*]{} neutron-capture process seen in Sakurai’s object; @herwig11].
Finally, it would be important to fully define the connection between the excess Kr in the stardust data and the Kr excess seen in the planetary nebulae observations (Fig. \[fig2\]). From a back-of-the-envelope calculation, if we increase by a factor of 4 the Kr abundance in the 2.5 [${M}_{\odot}$]{} model shown in Fig. \[fig2\], to simulate an extreme composition such as that shown by the high-density graphite grains (Fig. \[fig3\]), the \[Kr/Fe\] ratio would increase from its current value of 0.43 to 0.66, which is a much better match with the data. As we mentioned ealier, the capability of theoretical AGB models to reproduce PN $s$-process observations of Kr and Xe is still matter of debate, and a consistent scenario should be derived that works for both PNe and measurements from presolar grains.
Summary and conclusions
=======================
Nucleosynthesis in AGB stars shapes the abundances observed in planetary nebulae via a complex interplay of nuclear reactions and mixing processes such as the third dredge-up and hot bottom burning. As such, planetary nebula abundances provide an independent, complementary testbed for all these processes, including the production of the elements heavier than rion via the $s$ process. Conversely, the observed chemical abundance can be used to constraint the evolutionary path leading to the formation of planetary nebulae and the initial mass range. Specifically, we confirm that observations of \[Xe/Kr\] are a potential proxy for the traditional \[hs/ls\] $s$-process index and that the abundance of Rb can provide us crucial further constraints on the initial masses of planetary nebulae and the nucleosynthesis and mixing processes in massive AGB stars. Furthermore, noble gas abundances observed in meteoritic stardust grains are tracers of processes in planetary nebulae, from ionisation and implantation, to nucleosynthesis in the central star. The combination of all these different independent constraints will allow us to open new ways to understand planetary nebulae and the link to their parent AGB stars.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'In this article, we give a full description of a topological many-one degree structure of real-valued functions, recently introduced by Day-Downey-Westrick. We also point out that their characterization of the Bourgain rank of a Baire-one function of compact Polish domain can be extended to noncompact Polish domain. Finally, we clarify the relationship between the Martin conjecture and Day-Downey-Westrick’s topological Turing-like reducibility, also known as parallelized continuous strong Weihrauch reducibility, for single-valued functions: Under the axiom of determinacy, we show that the continuous Weihrauch degrees of parallelizable single-valued functions are well-ordered; and moreover, if $f$ is has continuous Weihrauch rank $\alpha$, then $f''$ has continuous Weihrauch rank $\alpha+1$, where $f''(x)$ is defined as the Turing jump of $f(x)$.'
address: 'Graduate School of Informatics, Nagoya University, Japan'
author:
- Takayuki Kihara
bibliography:
- 'topological\_reducibilities.bib'
title: Topological reducibilities for discontinuous functions and their structures
---
Introduction
============
Summary
-------
The notion of Wadge degrees provides us an ultimate measure to analyze the topological complexity of subsets of a zero-dimensional Polish space (see [@And07; @AnLo12]). Under the axiom of determinacy, the induced structure forms a semi-well-order of the height $\Theta$, and thus it enables us to assign an ordinal rank to each subset of such a space. Our main question is whether one can introduce a similar ultimate measure which induces a semi-well-ordering of [*real-valued functions*]{} on a Polish space. A somewhat related question is also proposed by Carroy [@Carroy13].
Recently, Day-Downey-Westrick [@DDW] introduced a “many-one”-like ordering $\leq_\mathbf{m}$ on real-valued functions on Cantor space. Their ordering $\leq_\mathbf{m}$ measures the topological complexity of sets separating the lower level sets from the upper level sets of a function. One of our main results in this article is to show that their notion $\leq_\mathbf{m}$ behaves like a Wadge ordering, and in particular, it semi-well-orders real-valued functions.
\[def:DDW-reducibi\] For $f,g\colon 2^{\omega}\to\mathbb{R}$, we say that $f$ is ${\mathbf{m}}$-reducible to $g$ (written $f\leq_{\mathbf{m}}g$) if for any rationals $p$ and ${\varepsilon}>0$, there are rationals $r$ and $\delta>0$ and a continuous function $\theta:2^{\omega}\to 2^{\omega}$ such that, for any $x\in 2^{\omega}$, $g(\theta(x))<r+\delta$ implies $f(x)<p+{\varepsilon}$, and $g(\theta(x))>r-\delta$ implies $f(x)>p-{\varepsilon}$.
One of Day-Downey-Westrick’s main discoveries is the connection between their notion of the ${\mathbf{m}}$-degree and the Bourgain rank (also known as the separation rank [@KeLo90]) of a Baire-one function. The latter notion is introduced by Bourgain [@Bo80] to prove a refinement of the Odell-Rosenthal theorem in Banach space theory: The $\ell^1$-index of a separable Banach space is related to the degrees of discontinuity (the Bourgain rank) of double-dual elements as Baire-one functions. Day-Downey-Westrick [@DDW] showed the following:
- The Bourgain rank $1$ consists of exactly two ${\mathbf{m}}$-degrees, those of constants and continuous functions.
- Every successor Bourgain rank $\geq 2$ consists of exactly four ${\mathbf{m}}$-degrees, where the first two ${\mathbf{m}}$-degrees are incomparable, and the others are comparable. For instance, the first two ${\mathbf{m}}$-degrees of Bourgain rank $2$ are those of lower semicontinuous and upper semicontinuous functions.
- Every infinite limit ordinal rank consists of exactly one ${\mathbf{m}}$-degree.
Their result completely characterizes the structure of the ${\mathbf{m}}$-degrees of the Baire-one functions, that is, the ${\mathbf{m}}$-degrees of rank below ${\omega}_1$. In this article, we will give a full description of the structure of the ${\mathbf{m}}$-degrees of all real-valued functions under the axiom of determinacy ${\sf AD}$ (or all Baire-class functions under ${\sf ZFC}$).
\[thm:mthm1\] The ${\mathbf{m}}$-degrees of real-valued functions on $2^{\omega}$ form a semi-well-order of length $\Theta$, where $\Theta$ is the least nonzero ordinal $\alpha$ such that there is no surjection from the reals onto $\alpha$.
For a limit ordinal $\alpha<\Theta$ and finite $n<\omega$, the ${\mathbf{m}}$-rank $\alpha+3n+c_\alpha$ consists of two incomparable degrees, and each of the other ranks consists of a single degree, where $c_\alpha=2$ if $\alpha=0$; $c_\alpha=1$ if the cofinality of $\alpha$ is $\omega$; and $c_\alpha=0$ if the cofinality of $\alpha$ is uncountable.
So far, we have only mentioned functions of Cantor domain. Now we would like to extend our results to more general domains. The difficulty arises here by the fact that the structure of Wadge degrees of subsets of a nonzero-dimensional Polish space is ill-behaved (cf. Ikegami et al. [@ITS16] and Schlicht [@Schl17]).
Fortunately, Pequignot [@Peq15] has overcome this difficulty by modifying the definition of Wadge reducibility using the theory of an admissible representation, and then, showed that the modified Wadge degree structure of subsets of a second-countable space is semi-well-ordered. Day-Downey-Westrick [@DDW] adopted a similar idea to consider the notion of $\mathbf{m}$-reducibility for functions of compact metrizable domain.
By integrating their ideas we introduce the notion of $\mathbf{m}$-reducibility for real-valued functions of (quasi-)Polish domain as follows. Let $\delta$ be a total open admissible representation of a Polish space $\mathcal{X}$ (see Lemma \[lem:total-open-admissible\]). Then, we introduce the ${\mathbf{m}}$-degree of a function $f\colon\mathcal{X}\to\mathbb{R}$ as that of $f\circ\delta\colon{\omega}^{\omega}\to\mathcal{X}$. As in Pequignot [@Peq15], this notion is easily seen to be well-defined (see Section \[sec:Bourgain-rank\]). Then we will conclude that the ${\mathbf{m}}$-degrees of real-valued functions on Polish spaces form a semi-well-order of length $\Theta$ (Observation \[obs:semi-well-order-m-deg\]).
Pequignot’s insightful idea also turns out to be very useful for the Wadge-like analysis of the Bourgain rank. We discuss the Bourgain rank in non-compact spaces (which is also considered by Elekes-Kiss-Vidnyánszky [@EKV16] via the change of topology, in order to generalize the notion of ranks to Baire class $\xi$ functions, and then to study a cardinal invariant associated with systems of difference equations). Then, based on the notion of sidedness conditions introduced by Day-Downey-Westrick [@DDW], we can classify real-valued functions on a (possibly non-compact) Polish space into (ordered) $5$ types (see Definition \[def:DDW-sided-conditions\]). We then generalize the main result in [@DDW] to arbitrary Polish domains as follows: Let $\mathcal{X}$ and $\mathcal{Y}$ be Polish spaces and let $f\colon\mathcal{X}\to\mathbb{R}$ and $g\colon\mathcal{Y}\to\mathbb{R}$ be Baire-one functions. Then, $f\leq_{\mathbf{m}}g$ if and only if either $\alpha(f)<\alpha(g)$ holds or both $\alpha(f)=\alpha(g)$ and ${\rm type}(f)\leq{\rm type}(g)$ hold. We also give the precise connection between the Bourgain rank and the Wadge rank. Finally, we will clarify the relationship between the uniform Martin conjecture and Day-Downey-Westrick’s $\mathbf{T}$-degrees of real-valued functions. They defined $\mathbf{T}$-reducibility for real-valued functions as parallelized continuous strong (p.c.s.) Weihrauch reducibility, that is, [*$f$ is $\mathbf{T}$-reducible to $g$*]{} if there are continuous functions $H,K$ such that $f=K\circ\widehat{g}\circ H$, where $\widehat{g}$ is the parallelization of $g$ (see Section \[sec:reducibility-notions\]).
The Martin conjecture is one of the most prominent open problems in computability theory (see [@MarSlaSte]), which generalize Sacks’ question on a natural solution to Post’s problem. The notion of $\mathbf{T}$-degree (p.c.s. Weihrauch degree) is seemingly unrelated to this conjecture; nevertheless we clarify the hidden relationship between them. We show that the p.c.s. Weihrauch degrees are exactly the [*natural*]{} Turing degrees in the context of the uniform Martin conjecture. More precisely, we will see that the p.c.s. Weihrauch degrees of real-valued functions is isomorphic to the Turing-degrees-on-a-cone of the uniformly Turing degree invariant operators. Indeed, the identity map induces an isomorphism between the Turing-ordering-on-a-cone of the uniformly $\leq_T$-preserving operators and the p.c.s. Weihrauch degrees of real-valued functions. Therefore, by Steel’s theorem [@Steel82], we finally conclude the following.
The p.c.s. Weihrauch degrees of single-valued functions are well-ordered, whose order type is $\Theta$. If $f$ is parallelizable (see Section \[sec:Martin-conjecture\]), and has p.c.s. Weihrauch rank $\alpha>0$, then $f'$ is also parallelizable, and has p.c.s. Weihrauch rank $\alpha+1$, where $f'(x)$ is defined as the Turing jump of $f(x)$.
Conventions and notations
-------------------------
In Sections \[sec:1-3\], \[sec:1-4\], \[sec:2\], \[sec:3\] and \[sec:Martin-conjecture\], we assume ${\sf ZF}+{\sf DC}+{\sf AD}$ (where ${\sf DC}$ stands for the axiom of dependent choice). Hence, our results hold in $L(\mathbb{R})$ under ${\sf ZFC}$ plus a large cardinal assumption. As usual, if we restrict our attention to Borel sets and Baire class functions, every result presented in this article is provable within ${\sf ZFC}$. If we restrict our attention to projective sets and functions, every result presented in this article is provable within ${\sf ZF}+{\sf DC}+{\sf PD}$ (where ${\sf PD}$ stands for the axiom of projective determinacy).
We assume that $2^{\omega}$ is always embedded into $\mathbb{R}$ as a Cantor set. For finite strings $\sigma,\tau\in{\omega}^{<{\omega}}$, we write $\sigma\prec\tau$ if $\tau$ extends $\sigma$. Similarly, for $X\in{\omega}^{\omega}$ we write $\sigma\prec X$ if $X$ extends $\sigma$. For a string $\sigma$, $[\sigma]$ denotes the set of all $X\in{\omega}^{\omega}$ extending $\sigma$, i.e., $\sigma\prec X$. Let $X{\upharpoonright}n$ be the initial segment of length $n$. Let $\sigma{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}\tau$ denote the concatenation of $\sigma$ and $\tau$.
The structure of Wadge degrees {#sec:1-3}
------------------------------
We here review classical results in the Wadge degree theory [@Wadge83; @AnLo12]. For sets $A,B\subseteq{\omega}^{\omega}$, we say that $A$ is Wadge reducible to $B$ (written $A\leq_wB$) if there exists a continuous function $\theta\colon{\omega}^{\omega}\to{\omega}^{\omega}$ such that $A=B\circ\theta$, where we often identify a set with its characteristic function.
Given a pointclass $\Gamma$ (of subsets of ${\omega}^{\omega}$), let $\check{\Gamma}$ denote its dual, that is, $\check{\Gamma}=\{{\omega}^{\omega}\setminus A:A\in\Gamma\}$, and define $\Delta=\Gamma\cap\check{\Gamma}$. A pointclass $\Gamma$ has the [*separation property*]{} if $$(\forall A,B\in\Gamma)\;[A\cap B=\emptyset\;\Longrightarrow\;(\exists C\in\Delta)\;A\subseteq C\mbox{ and }B\cap C=\emptyset].$$ The separation property will play a key role in the proof of our main theorem.
A pointclass $\Gamma$ is [*self-dual*]{} if $\Gamma=\check{\Gamma}$. We say that $A\subseteq{\omega}^{\omega}$ is [*self-dual*]{} if there is a continuous function $\theta\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to{\omega}^{\omega}$ such that $A(X)\not=A\circ\theta(X)$ for any $X\in{\omega}^{\omega}$. It is equivalent to saying that $A\leq_w\neg A$. Note that $A$ is self-dual if and only if the pointclass $\Gamma_A=\{B:B\leq_wA\}$ is self-dual.
By Wadge [@Wadge83] and Martin-Monk, non-self-dual pairs are well-ordered, say $(\Gamma_\alpha,\check{\Gamma}_\alpha)_{\alpha<\Theta}$, where $\Theta$ is the height of the Wadge degrees. We will use the following beautiful fact to show our Main Theorem \[thm:mthm1\].
\[fact:vanWesep-Steel\] Exactly one of $\Gamma_\alpha$ or $\check{\Gamma}_\alpha$ has the separation property.
By $\Pi_{\alpha}$, we denote the one which has the separation property, and by $\Sigma_{\alpha}$, we denote the other one (which has the weak reduction property). Then define $\Delta_\alpha=\Sigma_\alpha\cap\Pi_\alpha$.
A set $A\subseteq{\omega}^{\omega}$ is [*$\Gamma$-complete*]{} if $A\in\Gamma$ and $B\leq_wA$ for any $B\in\Gamma$. By definition, a $\Sigma_\alpha$-complete set and a $\Pi_\alpha$-complete set exist for all $\alpha<\Theta$.
\[fact:complete-cofinality\] A $\Delta_\alpha$-complete set exists if and only if the cofinality of $\alpha$ is countable.
We denote the Borel hierarchy by $({{\mathbf{\Sigma}^0_{\alpha}}},{{\mathbf{\Pi}^0_{\alpha}}},{{\mathbf{\Delta}^0_{\alpha}}})_{\alpha<{\omega}_1}$. More precisely, a set is in ${{\mathbf{\Sigma}^0_{1}}}$ if it is open, and a set is in ${{\mathbf{\Sigma}^0_{\alpha}}}$ if it is a countable union of sets in $\bigcup_{\beta<\alpha}{{\mathbf{\Pi}^0_{\beta}}}$, where ${{\mathbf{\Pi}^0_{\alpha}}}$ is the dual of ${{\mathbf{\Sigma}^0_{\alpha}}}$. Then, ${{\mathbf{\Delta}^0_{\alpha}}}={{\mathbf{\Sigma}^0_{\alpha}}}\cap{{\mathbf{\Pi}^0_{\alpha}}}$.
The Wadge ranks of sets of finite Borel ranks are calculated as follows.
- $\Delta_1=$ clopen sets ($=\mathbf{\Delta}^0_1$), $\Sigma_1=$ open sets ($=\mathbf{\Sigma}^0_1$), and $\Pi_1=$ closed sets ($=\mathbf{\Pi}^0_1$).
- For $\alpha<{\omega}_1$, $\Delta_\alpha$, $\Sigma_\alpha$, and $\Pi_\alpha$ correspond to the $\alpha$-th level of the Hausdorff difference hierarchy.
- $\Sigma_{{\omega}_1}=F_\sigma$ ($=\mathbf{\Sigma}^0_2$), and $\Pi_{{\omega}_1}=G_\delta$ ($=\mathbf{\Pi}^0_2$).
- For $\alpha<{\omega}_1$, $\Delta_{{\omega}_1^\alpha}$, $\Sigma_{{\omega}_1^\alpha}$, and $\Pi_{{\omega}_1^\alpha}$ correspond to the $\alpha$-th level of the difference hierarchy over $F_\sigma$.
- $\Sigma_{{\omega}_1^{{\omega}_1}}=G_{\delta\sigma}$ ($=\mathbf{\Sigma}^0_3$), and $\Pi_{{\omega}_1^{{\omega}_1}}=F_{\sigma\delta}$ ($=\mathbf{\Pi}^0_3$).
- Generally, $\Sigma_{{\omega}_1\uparrow\uparrow n}=\mathbf{\Sigma}^0_n$, where ${\omega}_1\uparrow\uparrow n$ is the $n$-th level of the superexponential hierarchy of base ${\omega}_1$.
Note that the Wadge rank of $\mathbf{\Sigma}^0_{{\omega}}$-complete set is not the first fixed point, but the ${\omega}_1$-th fixed point, of the exponential tower of base ${\omega}_1$. In general, Wadge [[@Wadge83 Sections V.E and V.F]]{} has also determined the Wadge ranks of sets of infinite Borel ranks, which are described by using the Veblen hierarchy of base ${\omega}_1$.
Let $\mathcal{X}$ and $\mathcal{Y}$ be topological spaces. For $A\subseteq\mathcal{X}$ and $B\subseteq\mathcal{Y}$, we write $A/\mathcal{X}\leq_wB/\mathcal{Y}$ if there is a continuous function $\theta\colon \mathcal{X}\to \mathcal{Y}$ such that $X\in A$ if and only if $\theta(X)\in B$.
\[lem:nsd-complete\] For any non-self-dual $A\subseteq{\omega}^{\omega}$, there is $B\subseteq 2^{\omega}$ such that $A/{\omega}^{\omega}\equiv_wB/2^{\omega}$.
If $A$ is non-self-dual, then $\neg A\not\leq_wA$, and therefore, Player I wins in the Wadge game $G_w(\neg A,A)$. Put $\hat{{\omega}}={\omega}\cup\{{\sf pass}\}$. A winning strategy for Player I gives a continuous function $\theta\colon \hat{{\omega}}^{\omega}\to{\omega}^{\omega}$ such that for any $X\in\hat{{\omega}}^{\omega}$, $\neg A(\theta(X))\not=A(X^{\sf p})$, that is, $A(\theta(X))=A(X^{\sf p})$. Here, $X^{\sf p}$ is the result of removing all occurrences of [pass]{}es from $X$. Define $\eta\colon 2^{\omega}\to\hat{{\omega}}^{\omega}$ by $$\eta(0^{n_0}10^{n_1}1\dots)={\sf pass}^{n_0}n_0{\sf pass}^{n_1}n_1\dots$$ Then, define $B(X)=A(\theta\circ\eta(X))$. We claim that $A/{\omega}^{\omega}\equiv_wB/2^{\omega}$. Clearly $\theta\circ\eta$ witnesses that $B\leq_wA$. To see $A\leq_wB$, let $X\in{\omega}^{\omega}$ be a given sequence. Then, for $\tau(X)=0^{X(0)}10^{X(1)}1\dots$, we have $(\eta\circ\tau(X))^{\sf p}=X$. Thus, $$B(\tau(X))=A(\theta\circ\eta\circ\tau(X))=A((\eta\circ\tau(X))^{\sf p})=A(X),$$ where the second equality follows from our choice of $\theta$. This concludes that $A\leq_wB$.
$\mathcal{Q}$-Wadge degrees {#sec:1-4}
---------------------------
A set $A\subseteq{\omega}^{\omega}$ can be identified with its characteristic function $\chi_A\colon{\omega}^{\omega}\to 2$. Thus, the Wadge degrees of subsets of ${\omega}^{\omega}$ can be viewed as the degrees of $2$-valued functions on ${\omega}^{\omega}$. The Wadge degrees have been extended in various directions. For instance, there are various works on the Wadge degrees of partial $2$-valued functions on ${\omega}^{\omega}$ (Wadge [@Wadge83]), ordinal-valued functions on ${\omega}^{\omega}$ (Steel, cf. Duparc [@Dup03]), and $k$-partitions of ${\omega}^{\omega}$ (Hertling, cf. Selivanov [@Seli17]). We can encapsulate all those extensions within the following framework (see also Kihara-Montalbán [@KMta; @KMta2]):
Let $(\mathcal{Q};\leq_\mathcal{Q})$ be a quasi-ordered set. For $\mathcal{Q}$-valued functions ${\mathcal{A}},{\mathcal{B}}\colon{\omega}^{\omega}\to\mathcal{Q}$, we say that [*${\mathcal{A}}$ is ${\mathcal{Q}}$-Wadge reducible to ${\mathcal{B}}$*]{} (written ${\mathcal{A}}\leq_w {\mathcal{B}}$) if there is a continuous function $\theta\colon{\omega}^{\omega}\to{\omega}^{\omega}$ such that $$(\forall X\in{\omega}^{\omega})\;{\mathcal{A}}(X)\leq_\mathcal{Q}{\mathcal{B}}(\theta(X)).$$
As a special case, one can study Wadge’s notion of degrees of inseparability of pairs, which will turn out to be a key tool for analyzing the $\mathbf{m}$-degrees. In his PhD thesis [@Wadge83 Section I.E], Wadge introduced the notion of reducibility for pairs of subsets of ${\omega}^{\omega}$. For $A,B,C,D\subseteq{\omega}^{\omega}$, we say that [*$(A,B)$ is Wadge reducible to $(C,D)$*]{} if there exists a continuous function $\theta\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to{\omega}^{\omega}$ such that for any $x\in{\omega}^{\omega}$, $$(x\in A\;\Longrightarrow \theta(x)\in C)\mbox{ and }(x\in B\;\Longrightarrow \theta(x)\in D).$$
Roughly speaking, this reducibility estimates how inseparable a given pair is. Note that Wadge reducibility for pairs is equivalent to Wadge reducibility for $\{\top,0,1,\bot\}$-valued functions by identifying a pair $(A,B)$ with a function $f_{A,B}$ defined by $$f_{A,B}(x)=
\begin{cases}
\top&\mbox{ if }x\in A\cap B,\\
0&\mbox{ if }x\in A\setminus B,\\
1&\mbox{ if }x\in B\setminus A,\\
\bot&\mbox{ if }x\not\in A\cup B,\\
\end{cases}$$ where $\bot<0,1<\top$, and $0$ and $1$ are incomparable. It is easy to see that the Wadge degrees of $\{\top,0,1,\bot\}$-valued functions consist exactly of the Wadge degrees of $\{0,1,\bot\}$-valued functions plus a greatest degree, where the greatest degree consists of functions containing $\top$ in their ranges.
Hereafter we use the symbols $\mathbf{2}$ and ${{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$ to denote $\{0,1\}$ and $\{0,1,\bot\}$, respectively, where $\mathbf{2}$ is considered as a discrete order, and ${{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$ is ordered by $\bot< 0,1$ as mentioned above, which is also known as Plotkin’s domain.
Wadge determined the structure of the first few Wadge degrees of inseparability of pairs (equivalently those of $\{0,1,\bot\}$-valued functions). For ${\mathcal{A}}\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to{{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$, we define $\neg{\mathcal{A}}\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to{{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$ by ${\mathcal{A}}(X)=1-{\mathcal{A}}(X)$ if ${\mathcal{A}}(X)\in\{0,1\}$; otherwise ${\mathcal{A}}(X)=\bot$. If ${\mathcal{A}}$ is $\mathbf{2}$-valued, then $\neg{\mathcal{A}}$ is obviously the complement of ${\mathcal{A}}$. Under the axiom of determinacy, Wadge has shown that the semilinear ordering principle holds for ${{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$-valued functions.
\[fact:Wadge-SLO\] For any ${\mathcal{A}},{\mathcal{B}}\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to{{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$, either ${\mathcal{B}}\leq_w{\mathcal{A}}$ or $\neg{\mathcal{A}}\leq_w{\mathcal{B}}$ holds.
For a function ${\mathcal{A}}\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to{\mathcal{Q}}$ and a finite string $\sigma\in{\omega}^{<{\omega}}$, by ${\mathcal{A}}{\upharpoonright}[\sigma]$ we denote the restriction of ${\mathcal{A}}$ up to $[\sigma]$, that is, $({\mathcal{A}}{\upharpoonright}[\sigma])(X)={\mathcal{A}}(\sigma{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}X)$. If $\sigma$ is a string of length $1$, $\sigma=\langle n\rangle$ say, then we also write ${\mathcal{A}}{\upharpoonright}n$ to denote ${\mathcal{A}}{\upharpoonright}[\langle n\rangle]$.
We say that a $\mathcal{Q}$-Wadge degree $\mathbf{a}$ is [*$\sigma$-join-reducible*]{} if $\mathbf{a}$ is the least upper bound of a countable collection $(\mathbf{b}_i)_{i\in{\omega}}$ of $\mathcal{Q}$-Wadge degrees such that $\mathbf{b}_i<_w\mathbf{a}$. Otherwise, we say that $\mathbf{a}$ is [*$\sigma$-join-irreducible*]{}.
Given a function ${\mathcal{A}}$ we use the following notation: $${\mathcal{F}}({\mathcal{A}})=\{X:(\forall n)\;{\mathcal{A}}{\upharpoonright}[X{\upharpoonright}n]\equiv_w{\mathcal{A}}\}.$$
The following fact gives a better way to characterize ${\sigma}$-join-reducibility, which is a straightforward consequence of the well-foundedness of the Wadge degrees (cf. [@AnLo12; @Wesep78]).
\[fact:sji-deg-pres\] ([AD]{}) A set ${\mathcal{A}}\subseteq{\omega}^{\omega}$ is $\sigma$-join-irreducible if and only if ${\mathcal{F}}({\mathcal{A}})$ is nonempty.
A function ${\mathcal{A}}\subseteq{\omega}^{\omega}$ is $\sigma$-join-reducible if and only if it is Wadge equivalent to a function of the form $\bigoplus_{n\in{\omega}}{\mathcal{A}}_n$, where each ${\mathcal{A}}_n$ is ${\sigma}$-join-irreducible and ${\mathcal{A}}_n<_w{\mathcal{A}}$, and where $\bigoplus_{n\in{\omega}}{\mathcal{A}}_n$ is defined by $(\bigoplus_{n\in{\omega}}{\mathcal{A}}_n)(n{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}X)={\mathcal{A}}_n(X)$.
We also need Steel–van Wesep’s theorem [@Wesep78].
\[fact:sjr-equal-sd\] Then a subset of ${\omega}^{\omega}$ is self-dual if and only if it is $\sigma$-join-reducible.
The structure of $\{0,1,\bot\}$-valued functions {#sec:2}
================================================
The proper ${{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$-Wadge degrees {#section:proper-three-Wadge}
----------------------------------------------
For $\Gamma\in\{\Sigma,\Pi,\Delta\}$, define $\Gamma_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}$ to be the class of all ${{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$-valued functions which are Wadge reducible to a $\Gamma_\alpha$ set, that is, $$\Gamma_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}=\{{\mathcal{A}}:{\omega}^{\omega}\to{{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}\mid (\exists S\in\Gamma_\alpha)\;{\mathcal{A}}\leq_wS\}.$$ Note that $\Delta_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}=\Sigma_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}\cap\Pi_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}$ does [*not*]{} hold anymore.
Let $\mathcal{D}^{{\diamondsuit}}_w$ be the set of all Wadge degrees of ${{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$-valued functions. Then, we define $\mathcal{D}_w\subseteq\mathcal{D}^{{\diamondsuit}}_w$ as the set of all Wadge degrees which contain $\mathbf{2}$-valued functions. A Wadge degree $\mathbf{d}$ is called a [*proper ${{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$-Wadge degree*]{} if $\mathbf{d}\in\mathcal{D}^{{\diamondsuit}}_w\setminus\mathcal{D}_w$. For a Wadge degree $\mathbf{d}\in\mathcal{D}^{{\diamondsuit}}_w$, let $\Gamma_\mathbf{d}$ be the collection of all ${\mathcal{A}}\colon{\omega}^{\omega}\to{{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$ such that ${\mathcal{A}}\leq_w{\mathcal{B}}$ for some ${\mathcal{B}}\in\mathbf{d}$. Note that any ${\mathcal{B}}\in\mathbf{d}$ is $\Gamma_\mathbf{d}$-complete.
\[lem:insert\] For any proper ${{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$-Wadge degree $\mathbf{d}$, there is $\alpha<\Theta$ such that $$\Delta_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}\subseteq\Gamma_\mathbf{d}\subseteq\Sigma_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}\cap\Pi_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}.$$
Let $\alpha<\Theta$ be the least ordinal such that $\Gamma_\mathbf{d}\subseteq\Sigma^{{\diamondsuit}}_\alpha\cap\Pi^{{\diamondsuit}}_\alpha$. Then, $\Gamma_\mathbf{d}\not\subseteq\Sigma^{{\diamondsuit}}_\beta$ or $\Gamma_\mathbf{d}\not\subseteq\Pi^{{\diamondsuit}}_\beta$ for any $\beta<\alpha$. Let ${\mathcal{A}}$ be a $\Gamma_\mathbf{d}$-complete function, and $B_0,B_1\subseteq{\omega}^{\omega}$ be $\Sigma_\beta$- and $\Pi_\beta$-complete sets, respectively. Then, ${\mathcal{A}}\not\leq_wB_i$ for some $i<2$. By Fact \[fact:Wadge-SLO\], we have $B_{1-i}\equiv_w\neg B_i\leq_w{\mathcal{A}}$. Since $\mathbf{d}$ is a proper ${{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$-Wadge degree, ${\mathcal{A}}\not\equiv_wB_{1-i}$, and therefore, we also have ${\mathcal{A}}\not\leq_wB_{1-i}$. Again, by Fact \[fact:Wadge-SLO\], we get $B_i\leq_w\neg B_{1-i}\leq_w{\mathcal{A}}$. Therefore, $B_0,B_1\leq_wA$, and hence, we conclude that $\Sigma^{{\diamondsuit}}_\beta\cup\Pi^{{\diamondsuit}}_\beta\subseteq\Gamma_\mathbf{d}$.
If the cofinality of $\alpha$ is uncountable, then $\Delta_\alpha=\bigcup_{\beta<\alpha}\Sigma_\beta$ since there is no $\Delta_\alpha$-complete set by Fact \[fact:complete-cofinality\] (see also [@Wesep78]). Therefore, $\Delta_\alpha\subseteq\Gamma_\mathbf{d}$ since $\Sigma_\beta\subseteq\Gamma_\mathbf{d}$ for any $\beta<\alpha$. Thus, $\Delta_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}\subseteq\Gamma_\mathbf{d}$. Assume that the cofinality of $\alpha$ is countable. Then, by Fact \[fact:complete-cofinality\], there is a $\Delta_\alpha$-complete set $C\subseteq{\omega}^{\omega}$. Since $\Delta_\alpha$ is a selfdual pointclass, $C$ is $\sigma$-join-reducible by Fact \[fact:sjr-equal-sd\], and thus by Fact \[fact:sji-deg-pres\], one can assume that $C$ is of the form $\bigoplus_nC_n$, where for any $n\in{\omega}$, there is $\beta<\alpha$ such that $C_n\in\Sigma_\beta\cup\Pi_\beta$. If ${\mathcal{A}}$ is a $\Gamma_\mathbf{d}$-complete set, then $C_n\leq_w{\mathcal{A}}$ for any $n$ since $\Sigma_\beta\cup\Pi_\beta\subseteq\Gamma_\mathbf{d}$. By combining these Wadge reductions, we obtain $\bigoplus_nC_n\leq_w{\mathcal{A}}$. Thus, $\Delta_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}\subseteq\Gamma_\mathbf{d}$.
The non-proper $m$-Wadge degrees {#sec:structure-non-proper-m-deg}
--------------------------------
We say that [*${\mathcal{A}}\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to\mathcal{Q}$ is $\mathcal{Q}$-$m$-Wadge reducible to ${\mathcal{B}}\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to\mathcal{Q}$*]{} (${\mathcal{A}}\leq_{mw}{\mathcal{B}}$) if for any $n\in{\omega}$, there are $m\in{\omega}$ and a continuous function $\theta\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to{\omega}^{\omega}$ such that for any $X\in{\omega}^{\omega}$, $${\mathcal{A}}(n{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}X)\leq_\mathcal{Q}{\mathcal{B}}(m{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}\theta(X)),$$
Note that $\theta$ may depend on $n$, and thus the above reduction involves countably many functions $(\theta_n)_{n\in{\omega}}$ and $n\mapsto m$. Clearly, this is an intermediate notion between Lipschitz reducibility and Wadge reducibility. The game associated to $\mathcal{Q}$-$m$-Wadge reducibility has been studied by Kihara-Montalbán [@KMta Section 4.2] (which is a simpler version of Steel’s degree invariant game [@Steel82]).
We say that ${\mathcal{A}}\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to\mathcal{Q}$ is [*$m$-$\sigma$-join-reducible*]{} ($m$-$\sigma$-jr) if ${\mathcal{A}}{\upharpoonright}n<_w{\mathcal{A}}$ for any $n\in{\omega}$. Otherwise, we say that ${\mathcal{A}}$ is [*$m$-$\sigma$-join-irreducible*]{} ($m$-$\sigma$-ji).
\[lem:m-deg-sigma-ji\] Assume that ${\mathcal{B}}\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to\mathcal{Q}$ is $m$-$\sigma$-ji. Then, for any ${\mathcal{A}}\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to\mathcal{Q}$, $${\mathcal{A}}\leq_{mw}{\mathcal{B}}\iff {\mathcal{A}}\leq_w{\mathcal{B}}.$$
It is clear that ${\mathcal{A}}\leq_{mw}{\mathcal{B}}$ implies ${\mathcal{A}}\leq_w{\mathcal{B}}$. For the reverse implication, since ${\mathcal{B}}$ is $m$-$\sigma$-ji, there is $m$ such that ${\mathcal{A}}\leq_w{\mathcal{B}}\leq_w{\mathcal{B}}{\upharpoonright}m$. Let $\theta$ witness ${\mathcal{A}}\leq_w{\mathcal{B}}{\upharpoonright}m$. Then, we have ${\mathcal{A}}(n{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}X)\leq_{\mathcal{Q}}{\mathcal{B}}(m{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}\theta(n{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}X))$. This clearly implies that ${\mathcal{A}}\leq_{mw}{\mathcal{B}}$.
As $\Sigma_\alpha$ and $\Pi_\alpha$ are non-self-dual, by Fact \[fact:sjr-equal-sd\], $\Sigma_\alpha$- and $\Pi_\alpha$-complete sets are $\sigma$-ji. Thus, by Lemma \[lem:m-deg-sigma-ji\], $\Sigma^{{\diamondsuit}}_\alpha$- and $\Pi^{{\diamondsuit}}_\alpha$-complete functions are also complete w.r.t. $m$-Wadge reducibility.
\[lem:m-deg-delta-alpha\] Let $\alpha<\Theta$ be an ordinal of countable cofinality. Then, there are exactly two ${{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$-$m$-Wadge degrees of the $\Delta^{{\diamondsuit}}_\alpha$-complete functions.
As a $\Delta_\alpha$-complete set is $\sigma$-jr, by Fact \[fact:sji-deg-pres\], it is Wadge equivalent to a set of the form ${\mathcal{A}}=\bigoplus_n{\mathcal{A}}_n$, which is clearly $m$-$\sigma$-jr, and $\Delta^{{\diamondsuit}}_\alpha$-complete. Then, it is also clear that $0{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}{\mathcal{A}}=\{0{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}X:X\in {\mathcal{A}}\}$ is an $m$-$\sigma$-ji $\Delta^{{\diamondsuit}}_\alpha$-complete set. Obviously, ${\mathcal{A}}<_{mw}0{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}{\mathcal{A}}$. Now, $\Delta^{{\diamondsuit}}_\alpha$-complete functions split into $m$-$\sigma$-jr ones and $m$-$\sigma$-ji ones. By Lemma \[lem:m-deg-sigma-ji\], if ${\mathcal{A}}$ and ${\mathcal{B}}$ are $m$-$\sigma$-ji $\Delta^{{\diamondsuit}}_\alpha$-complete functions, then ${\mathcal{A}}\equiv_{mw}{\mathcal{B}}$.
Assume that ${\mathcal{A}}$ and ${\mathcal{B}}$ are $m$-$\sigma$-jr $\Delta^{{\diamondsuit}}_\alpha$-complete functions. First consider the case that $\alpha$ is a successor ordinal, $\alpha=\beta+1$ say. By our assumption, we have ${\mathcal{A}}=\bigoplus_n({\mathcal{A}}{\upharpoonright}n)$ where ${\mathcal{A}}{\upharpoonright}n<_w{\mathcal{A}}$, which implies that ${\mathcal{A}}{\upharpoonright}n$ is not $\Delta^{{\diamondsuit}}_\alpha$-complete. If ${\mathcal{A}}{\upharpoonright}n$ has a proper ${{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$-Wadge degree $\mathbf{d}$, then as $\Delta^{{\diamondsuit}}_\alpha\not\subseteq\Gamma_\mathbf{d}$, by Lemma \[lem:insert\], we have ${\mathcal{A}}{\upharpoonright}n\in\Gamma_\mathbf{d}\subseteq\Sigma^{{\diamondsuit}}_\beta\cap\Pi^{{\diamondsuit}}_\beta$. The join of such functions is also in $\Sigma^{{\diamondsuit}}_\beta\cap\Pi^{{\diamondsuit}}_\beta$. This concludes that ${\mathcal{A}}$ is Wadge equivalent to the join of functions of non-proper ${{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$-Wadge degrees; that is, there are $m,n\in{\omega}$ such that ${\mathcal{A}}{\upharpoonright}m$ and ${\mathcal{A}}{\upharpoonright}n$ are $\Sigma_\beta^{{\diamondsuit}}$- and $\Pi^{{\diamondsuit}}_\beta$-complete, respectively. Again, by Lemma \[lem:insert\], for any $n\in{\omega}$, ${\mathcal{B}}{\upharpoonright}n$ is either $\Sigma^{{\diamondsuit}}_\beta$ or $\Pi^{{\diamondsuit}}_\beta$ since ${\mathcal{B}}$ is $m$-$\sigma$-jr. This shows that ${\mathcal{B}}\leq_{mw}{\mathcal{A}}$. By a symmetric argument, we also have ${\mathcal{A}}\leq_{mw}{\mathcal{B}}$, and conclude that ${\mathcal{A}}\equiv_{mw}{\mathcal{B}}$. For a limit ordinal $\alpha$, for any $n\in{\omega}$, ${\mathcal{B}}{\upharpoonright}n$ is in $\Sigma^{{\diamondsuit}}_\beta$ for some $\beta<\alpha$ since ${\mathcal{B}}$ is m-$\sigma$-jr. Then there are $m\in{\omega}$ and $\gamma$ such that $\beta\leq\gamma<\alpha$ and every $\Sigma^{{\diamondsuit}}_\gamma$ function is ${{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$-Wadge reducible to ${\mathcal{A}}{\upharpoonright}m$ since $\alpha$ is limit and ${\mathcal{A}}=\bigoplus_n({\mathcal{A}}{\upharpoonright}n)$ is $\Delta_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}$-complete. Hence, ${\mathcal{B}}{\upharpoonright}n\leq_w{\mathcal{A}}{\upharpoonright}m$, which implies that ${\mathcal{B}}\leq_{mw}{\mathcal{A}}$. By a symmetric argument, we also have ${\mathcal{A}}\leq_{mw}{\mathcal{B}}$, and conclude that ${\mathcal{A}}\equiv_{mw}{\mathcal{B}}$.
![The structure of $m$-Wadge degrees of subsets of ${\omega}^{\omega}$ (The structure of [*non-proper*]{} $m$-Wadge degrees of $\mathbf{2}_\bot$-valued functions of ${\omega}^{\omega}$)[]{data-label="fig:1"}](mw-degrees.eps)
Lemmas \[lem:m-deg-sigma-ji\] and \[lem:m-deg-delta-alpha\] give the complete description of the [*non-proper*]{} ${{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$-$m$-Wadge degree structure, hence the $m$-Wadge degree structure of subsets of ${\omega}^{\omega}$. Each selfdual Wadge degree splits into two degrees (which are linearly ordered), and nonselfdual Wadge degrees remain the same. See Figure \[fig:1\], where $\Delta^{jr}_\alpha$ denotes the class of all sets $m$-Wadge reducible to an $m$-$\sigma$-jr $\Delta_\alpha$ set.
Many-one reducibility for real-valued functions {#sec:3}
===============================================
Reducibility for real-valued functions
--------------------------------------
Day-Downey-Westrick [@DDW] introduced the notion of $\mathbf{m}$-reducibility for real-valued functions. Let $[\mathbb{Q}]^2$ be the set of all pairs $(p,q)$ of rationals such that $p<q$. For $f\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to\mathbb{R}$, we define ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}\colon [\mathbb{Q}]^2\times{\omega}^{\omega}\to{{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$ as follows. $${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}(\langle p,q\rangle{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}X)=
\begin{cases}
0&\mbox{ if }f(X)\leq p,\\
1&\mbox{ if }q\leq f(X),\\
\bot&\mbox{ if }p<f(X)<q.\\
\end{cases}$$
For $f,g\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to\mathbb{R}$, we say that [*$f$ is $\mathbf{m}$-reducible to $g$*]{} (written $f\leq_\mathbf{m}g$) if for any pair of rationals $p<q$, there are a pair of rationals $r<s$ and a continuous function $\theta\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to{\omega}^{\omega}$ such that for any $X\in{\omega}^{\omega}$, $${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}(\langle p,q\rangle{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}X)\leq_{{{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}}{\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}(\langle r,s\rangle{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}\theta(X)).$$
We denote by $\{f\leq p\}$ and $\{f\geq q\}$ the upper and lower level sets $\{X:f(X)\leq p\}$ and $\{X:f(X)\geq q\}$, respectively. We also define $\{f<p\}$ and $\{f>q\}$ in a similar manner. In the context of Wadge’s pair reducibility [@Wadge83 Section I.E], $f\leq_\mathbf{m}g$ if and only if for any $p<q$ there are $r<s$ such that $(\{f\leq p\},\{f\geq q\})$ is Wadge reducible to $(\{g\leq r\},\{g\geq s\})$.
The above definition of $\leq_\mathbf{m}$ coincides with Definition \[def:DDW-reducibi\].
It is clear that $f\leq_\mathbf{m}g$ in the sense of Definition \[def:DDW-reducibi\] if and only if for any $p,{\varepsilon}$ there are $r,\delta$ such that $(\{f\leq p-{\varepsilon}\},\{f\geq p+{\varepsilon}\})\leq_w(\{g\leq r-\delta\},\{g\geq r+\delta\})$.
We often identify $[\mathbb{Q}]^2$ and ${\omega}$ via a fixed bijection. Under this identification, ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ is thought of as a function from ${\omega}\times{\omega}^{\omega}$ to ${{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$, and thus, the $\mathbf{m}$-degree structure embeds into the ${{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$-$m$-Wadge degree structure, that is,
For a function $f\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to\mathbb{R}$, $f\leq_\mathbf{m}g$ if and only if ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}\leq_{mw}{\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}$.
We will show that the map $f\mapsto{\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ induces an isomorphism between the $\mathbf{m}$-degrees on real-valued functions on ${\omega}^{\omega}$ and the $m$-Wadge degrees on nonempty proper subsets of ${\omega}^{\omega}$.
\[thm:main-theorem1\] The map $f\mapsto {\rm Lev}_f$ induces an isomorphism between the quotients of $(\mathcal{F}({\omega}^{\omega},\mathbb{R}),\leq_\mathbf{m})$ and $(\mathcal{P}({\omega}^{\omega})\setminus\{\emptyset,{\omega}^{\omega}\},\leq_{mw})$.
The proof of Theorem \[thm:main-theorem1\] will be given in the rest of this section. As a consequence of Theorem \[thm:main-theorem1\], the structure of $\mathbf{m}$-degrees of real-valued functions on ${\omega}^{\omega}$ looks like Figure \[fig:1\]. We will also show that the structure of $\mathbf{m}$-degrees of real-valued functions on $2^{\omega}$ looks like Figure \[fig:2\]. That is, it is almost isomorphic to the $m$-Wadge degrees of nonempty proper subsets of ${\omega}^{\omega}$ except that if $\alpha$ is a limit ordinal of countable cofinality, the $m$-Wadge degree of an $m$-$\sigma$-ji $\Delta_\alpha$-complete set cannot be realized.
![The structure of $m$-degrees of real-valued functions on $2^{\omega}$[]{data-label="fig:2"}](mw-degrees2.eps)
Non-proper Wadge degrees
------------------------
We first characterize non-proper ${{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$-Wadge degrees realized as real-valued functions.
\[lem:non-proper-Wadge-for-reals\]
1. For any nonzero ordinal $\alpha<\Theta$, there are functions $f,g\colon 2^{\omega}\to\{0,1\}$ such that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ and ${\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}$ are $\Sigma_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}$- and $\Pi_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}$-complete, respectively.
2. For any nonzero ordinal $\alpha<\Theta$ of countable cofinality, there is a function $f\colon 2^{\omega}\to[0,1]$ such that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ is $m$-$\sigma$-jr and $\Delta_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}$-complete.
3. For any successor ordinal $\alpha<\Theta$, there is a function $f\colon 2^{\omega}\to\{0,1\}$ such that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ is $m$-$\sigma$-ji and $\Delta_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}$-complete.
4. For any limit ordinal $\alpha<\Theta$ of countable cofinality, there is a function $f\colon {\omega}\times 2^{\omega}\to\{0,1\}$ such that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ is $m$-$\sigma$-ji and $\Delta_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}$-complete.
5. For any limit ordinal $\alpha<\Theta$ of countable cofinality, there is no function $f\colon 2^{\omega}\to\mathbb{R}$ such that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ is $m$-$\sigma$-ji and $\Delta_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}$-complete.
6. There is no $f\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to\mathbb{R}$ such that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}\equiv_w\emptyset$ or ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}\equiv_w{\omega}^{\omega}$.
\(1) Let $A\subseteq 2^{\omega}$ be a $\Sigma_\alpha$-complete set. Such a set exists by Lemma \[lem:nsd-complete\]. Define $\chi_A\colon 2^{\omega}\to\{0,1\}$ by $\chi_A(X)=1$ if $X\in A$; otherwise $\chi_A(X)=0$. Clearly $A\leq_w{\mathrm{Lev}_{A}}:={\mathrm{Lev}_{{\chi_A}}}$ since $A(X)={\mathrm{Lev}_{A}}(\langle 0,1\rangle{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}X)$. For ${\mathrm{Lev}_{A}}\leq_wA$, since the Wadge rank of $A$ is nonzero, $\emptyset,{\omega}^{\omega}\leq_wA$, and therefore, there is $Y_j\in 2^{\omega}$ such that $A(Y_j)=j$ for each $j\in\{0,1\}$. Given $p,q$, if $p<0$, define $\theta_{p,q}(X)=Y_0$, and if $q>1$, define $\theta_{p,q}(X)=Y_1$. If $0\leq p<q\leq 1$, then we have $A(X)={\mathrm{Lev}_{A}}(\langle p,q\rangle{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}X)$, and thus define $\theta_{p,q}(X)=X$. The function $\theta$ witnesses that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{A}}\leq_wA$. Consequently, ${\mathrm{Lev}_{A}}$ is $\Sigma_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}$-complete. By a similar argument, one can construct $g$ such that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}$ is $\Pi_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}$-complete.
\(2) First assume that $\alpha$ is a limit ordinal, say $\alpha=\sup_i\beta_i$. By (1), we have a function $f_i\colon 2^{\omega}\to\{0,1\}$ such that $L_i:={\mathrm{Lev}_{f_i}}$ is $\Sigma_{\beta_i}^{{\diamondsuit}}$-complete for each $i<{\omega}$. Note that $L_i\leq_wL_i{\upharpoonright}\langle 0,1\rangle$. Let $(a_n)_{n\in{\omega}}$ be strictly decreasing sequence of positive reals. We define $g(0^{\omega})=0$ and $g(0^n1X)=a_{2n+1-f_n(X)}$. Let $A\subseteq{\omega}^{\omega}$ be a $\Delta_\alpha$-complete set of the form $\bigoplus_i A_i$ such that $A_i$ is $\Sigma_{\beta_i}$-complete. Then, clearly $A$ is $m$-$\sigma$-jr. We claim that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}\equiv_{mw}A$.
For $A\leq_{mw}{\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}$, given $n$ we know that $A_n\leq_wL_{n}{\upharpoonright}\langle 0,1\rangle$ via some continuous function $\theta_n$. Then, $$A_n(X)=i\;\Longrightarrow\;f_n(\theta_n(X))=i\;\Longrightarrow\;g(0^n1\theta_n(X))=a_{2n+1-i}.$$
Thus, $\langle n,X\rangle\mapsto 0^n1\theta_n(X)$ witnesses $A{\upharpoonright}\langle 0,1\rangle\leq_{w}{\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}{\upharpoonright}\langle a_{2n+1},a_{2n}\rangle$. Hence, $A\leq_{mw}{\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}$. To see ${\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}\leq_{mw}A$, let $p<q$ be rationals. First consider the case that the open interval $(p,q)$ intersects with $(a_{2n+2},a_{2n+1})$ for some $n\in{\omega}$. By our definition of $g$, if $X$ extends $0^{n+1}$ then $g(X)\leq a_{2n+2}$, and if $X$ extends $0^m1$ for some $m\leq n$ then $g(X)\geq a_{2n+1}$. Since the Wadge rank of $A$ is nonzero, $\emptyset,{\omega}^{\omega}\leq_wA$, and therefore, there is $Y_j$ such that $A(Y_j)=j$ for each $j<2$. Define $\theta_{p,q}(X)=Y_0$ if $X$ extends $0^{n+1}$; otherwise $\theta_{p,q}(X)=Y_1$. Then, $$\begin{gathered}
{\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}(\langle p,q\rangle{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}X)=0\;\Longrightarrow\;g(X)\leq p<a_{2n+1}\;\Longrightarrow\;g(X)\leq a_{2n+2}\\
\Longrightarrow\;X\succ 0^{n+1}\;\Longrightarrow\;A\circ\theta_{p,q}(X)=A(Y_0)=0.\end{gathered}$$ Similarly, ${\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}(\langle p,q\rangle{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}X)=1$ implies that $A\circ\theta_{p,q}(X)=A(Y_1)=1$. This shows that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}{\upharpoonright}\langle p,q\rangle\leq_{w}A{\upharpoonright}\langle 0,1\rangle$.
Now, assume that $(p,q)$ does not intersects with $(a_{2n+2},a_{2n+1})$ for any $n\in{\omega}$. If $a_0<p$ then ${\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}(\langle p,q\rangle{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}X)=0$ for any $X$. If $q<0$, then ${\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}(\langle p,q\rangle{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}X)=1$ for any $X$. In these cases, it is clear that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}{\upharpoonright}\langle p,q\rangle\leq_{w}A{\upharpoonright}\langle 0,1\rangle$.
Otherwise, $a_1\leq p\leq a_0$ or $a_{2n+1}\leq p<q\leq a_{2n}$ for some $n\in{\omega}$. Assume that $a_{2n+1}\leq p<q\leq a_{2n}$. If $X$ extends $0^m1$ for some $m<n$, then $g(X)\geq a_{2n-1}>p$, and thus define $\theta_{p,q}(X)=Y_1$. If $X$ extends $0^{n+1}$, then $g(X)\leq a_{2n+2}<p$, and thus define $\theta_{p,q}(X)=Y_0$. If $X$ is of the form $0^n1Z$, one can see that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}(\langle p,q\rangle{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}X)=L_n(Z)$. Then, define $\theta_{p,q}(X)=n{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}\tau_n(Z)$, where $\tau_n$ is a continuous function witnesses that $L_n\leq_wA_n$. This shows that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}{\upharpoonright}\langle p,q\rangle\leq_{mw}A{\upharpoonright}\langle 0,1\rangle$. For $a_1\leq p\leq a_0$, a similar argument applies. Thus, we conclude that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}\equiv_{mw}A$, that is, ${\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}$ is $m$-$\sigma$-jr and $\Delta_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}$-complete.
\(4) Assume that $\alpha=\sup_i\beta_i$. By (1), we have a function $f_i\colon 2^{\omega}\to\{0,1\}$ such that $L_i:={\mathrm{Lev}_{f_i}}$ is $\Sigma_{\beta_i}$-complete for each $i<{\omega}$. Note that $L_i\leq_wL_i{\upharpoonright}\langle 0,1\rangle$. Then, define $g(iX)=f_i(X)$. It is clear that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}$ is $\Delta_\alpha$-complete. Moreover, one can see that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}\leq_w{\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}{\upharpoonright}\langle 0,1\rangle$. Hence, ${\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}$ is $m$-$\sigma$-ji.
\(3) A similar argument as in the item (4) also verifies the item (3) except for $\alpha=1$. Thus, assume that $\alpha=1$, and let $f$ be a nonconstant continuous function. We claim that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ is $m$-$\sigma$-ji and $\Delta_1^{{\diamondsuit}}$-complete. Since $f$ is nonconstant, there are $X_0,X_1$ such that $f(X_0)<f(X_1)$. Choose rationals $r<s$ such that $f(X_0)\leq r<s\leq f(X_1)$. It suffices to show that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}{\upharpoonright}\langle p,q\rangle\leq_w{\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}{\upharpoonright}\langle r,s\rangle$ for any $p<q$. Since $f$ is continuous, $\{f\leq p\}$ and $\{f\geq q\}$ are both closed. Since $\Pi^0_1$ has the separation property, there is a clopen set $C\subseteq{\omega}^{\omega}$ separating $\{f\leq p\}$ from $\{f\geq q\}$. Define $\theta_{p,q}(X)=Y_0$ if $X\in C$; otherwise $\theta_{p,q}(X)=Y_1$. Then, $\theta_{p,q}$ is continuous since $C$ is clopen. It is easy to see that $\theta_{p,q}$ witnesses that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}{\upharpoonright}\langle p,q\rangle\leq_w{\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}{\upharpoonright}\langle r,s\rangle$.
\(5) Assume that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ is $m$-$\sigma$-ji and $\Delta_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}$-complete. Since ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ is $m$-$\sigma$-ji, there are $p,q$ such that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}{\upharpoonright}\langle p,q\rangle$ is $\Delta_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}$-complete. However, since ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}{\upharpoonright}\langle p,q\rangle$ is a function on $2^{\omega}$, and $\alpha$ is limit, it is impossible by compactness: If ${\mathcal{A}}$ is $\Delta^{{\diamondsuit}}_\alpha$-complete, then ${\mathcal{A}}$ is Wadge equivalent to a function of the form $\bigoplus_n{\mathcal{A}}_n$, where ${\mathcal{A}}_n\in\Sigma_{\beta_n}^{{\diamondsuit}}$ for some $\beta_n<\alpha$. Let $\theta\colon 2^{\omega}\to{\omega}^{\omega}$ witness ${\mathcal{A}}\leq_w\bigoplus_n{\mathcal{A}}_n$. As $\theta$ is continuous and $2^{\omega}$ is compact, the image of $\theta$ is also compact. Hence, there is $k\in{\omega}$ such that $\theta$ witnesses ${\mathcal{A}}\leq_w\bigoplus_{n<k}{\mathcal{A}}_n$. This implies that ${\mathcal{A}}$ is in $\Sigma^{{\diamondsuit}}_\beta$, where $\beta=\max_{n<k}\beta_n<\alpha$, a contradiction.
\(6) Fix $X\in{\omega}^{\omega}$. Then, there are $p,q$ such that $p<f(X)<q$. Thus, ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}(\langle p-1,p\rangle{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}X)=1$ and ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}(\langle q,q+1\rangle{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}X)=0$. Therefore, ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ is not Wadge reducible to constant functions such as (the characteristic functions of) $\emptyset$ and ${\omega}^{\omega}$.
Proper Wadge degrees
--------------------
We finally show that, as a consequence of the van Wesep-Steel Theorem (Fact \[fact:vanWesep-Steel\]), proper Wadge degrees disappear in the $\mathbf{m}$-degrees of real-valued functions.
For any proper ${{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$-Wadge degree $\mathbf{d}$, there is no $f\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to\mathbb{R}$ such that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ is $\Gamma_\mathbf{d}$-complete.
Let $\alpha<\Theta$ be an ordinal in Lemma \[lem:insert\], that is, $\Delta_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}\subseteq\Gamma_\mathbf{d}\subseteq\Sigma_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}\cap\Pi_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}$. Assume that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}\in\Gamma_\mathbf{d}$. We claim that for any $p<q$, ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}{\upharpoonright}\langle p,q\rangle$ is $\Delta_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}$. Let $U,V\subseteq{\omega}^{\omega}$ be $\Sigma_\alpha$- and $\Pi_\alpha$-complete sets, respectively. Choose rationals $p<r<s<q$. Since ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}\in\Sigma_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}\cap\Pi_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}$, there are continuous functions $\tau_0,\tau_1$ such that $${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}(\langle p,r\rangle{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}X)\leq_{{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}U\circ\tau_0(X)\mbox{, and }{\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}(\langle s,q\rangle{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}X)\leq_{{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}V\circ\tau_1(X).$$ Consider $A=\{X:U\circ\tau_0(X)=0\}$ and $B=\{X:V\circ\tau_1(X)=1\}$, that is, $A=\tau_0^{-1}[{\omega}^{\omega}\setminus U]$ and $B=\tau_1^{-1}[V]$. Clearly, $A,B\in\Pi_\alpha$. Moreover, $$\begin{aligned}
&f(X)\leq p\;\Longrightarrow\;U\circ\tau_0(X)=0\iff X\in A\;\Longrightarrow\;f(X)<r\\
&f(X)\geq q\;\Longrightarrow\;V\circ\tau_1(X)=1\iff X\in B\;\Longrightarrow\;f(X)>s.\end{aligned}$$
This implies that $\{f\leq p\}\subseteq A$, $\{f\geq q\}\subseteq B$, and $A\cap B=\emptyset$. By the separation property of $\Pi_\alpha$ (Fact \[fact:vanWesep-Steel\]), there is a $\Delta_\alpha$ set $C\subseteq{\omega}^{\omega}$ such that $C\subseteq A$ and ${\omega}^{\omega}\setminus C\subseteq B$. Then, $$\{f\leq p\}\subseteq C\mbox{, and }\{f\geq q\}\subseteq{\omega}^{\omega}\setminus C.$$
This shows that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}{\upharpoonright}\langle p,q\rangle\leq_wC$, and therefore, ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}{\upharpoonright}\langle p,q\rangle$ is $\Delta_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}$, which verifies our claim. Consequently, ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}=\bigoplus_{p,q}{\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}{\upharpoonright}\langle p,q\rangle$ is also $\Delta_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}$, and in particular, ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ cannot be $\Gamma_\mathbf{d}$-complete.
This concludes the proof of Theorem \[thm:main-theorem1\].
For any Wadge degree $\mathbf{d}$ of a subset of ${\omega}^{\omega}$, $\mathbf{d}$ is the Wadge degree of a $\Sigma_\alpha$- or $\Pi_\alpha$-complete set for some $\alpha<\Theta$, or a $\Delta_\alpha$ set for some $\alpha<\Theta$ whose cofinality is countable by Fact \[fact:complete-cofinality\]. As seen in the last paragraph in Section \[sec:structure-non-proper-m-deg\], every selfdual Wadge degree splits into two $m$-Wadge degrees (which are linearly ordered), and nonselfdual Wadge degrees remains the same. By Theorem \[thm:main-theorem1\] and Lemma \[lem:non-proper-Wadge-for-reals\] (5), we conclude that the structure of $\mathbf{m}$-degrees of real-valued functions on $2^{\omega}$ looks like Figure \[fig:2\] as desired.
The Bourgain rank {#sec:Bourgain-rank}
=================
In this section, we will generalize Day-Downey-Westrick’s result on the Bourgain rank $\alpha$ to an arbitrary Polish domain. Pequignot [@Peq15] extended the notion of Wadge reducibility to subsets of second countable spaces based on the theory of admissible representation. An [*admissible representation*]{} of a topological space $\mathcal{X}$ is a partial continuous surjection $\delta:\subseteq{\omega}^{\omega}\twoheadrightarrow\mathcal{X}$ which has the following universal property: For any partial continuous function $f:\subseteq{\omega}^{\omega}\to\mathcal{X}$, there is a partial continuous function $\tau:\subseteq{\omega}^{\omega}\to{\omega}^{\omega}$ such that $f=\delta\circ\tau$. An admissible representation is [*open*]{} if it is an open map, and [*total*]{} if its domain is ${\omega}^{\omega}$. The following result seems folklore, but we present the proof for the sake of completeness.
\[lem:total-open-admissible\] Every Polish space has a total open admissible representation.
If $\mathcal{X}$ is Polish, as in Kechris [@Kec95 Exercise 7.14], one can construct a Suslin scheme $\mathcal{U}=(U_s)_{s\in{\omega}^{<{\omega}}}$ on $\mathcal{X}$ whose associate map is a total open continuous surjection $\delta_{\rm Sus}^\mathcal{U}\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\twoheadrightarrow\mathcal{X}$, where $\delta_{\rm Sus}^\mathcal{U}(p)$ is defined as a unique element in $\bigcap_nU_{p{\upharpoonright}n}$. Here, this particular Suslin scheme satisfies $U_{\emptyset}=\mathcal{X}$ and $U_s=\bigcup_nU_{s{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}n}$. Although it is not hard to check that $\delta_{\rm Sus}^\mathcal{U}$ is admissible, we here give the proof for the sake of completeness.
To see that $\delta_{\rm Sus}^\mathcal{U}$ is admissible, recall that the “neighborhood filter” representation is always admissible, that is, for any countable basis $\mathcal{B}=(B_e)_{e\in{\omega}}$ of $\mathcal{X}$ with $B_0=\mathcal{X}$, consider $\mathcal{N}^\mathcal{B}_x=\{e\in{\omega}:x\in B_e\}$, and then define $\delta^\mathcal{B}_{\rm nbhd}(p)=x$ if the range of $p$ is equal to $\mathcal{N}_x^\mathcal{B}$. It is well-known that $\delta^\mathcal{B}_{\rm nbhd}$ is an admissible representation of $\mathcal{X}$ (cf. [@deB13 Theorem 48]). It suffices to find a partial continuous function $\tau:\subseteq{\omega}^{\omega}\to{\omega}^{\omega}$ such that $\delta^\mathcal{B}_{\rm nbhd}=\delta^\mathcal{U}_{\rm Sus}\circ\tau$. Given $p\in{\omega}^{\omega}$, wait for the first $t\in{\omega}$ such that $B_{p(t)}\subseteq U_{\langle n\rangle}$ for some $n\in{\omega}$. If there are such $t$ and $n$, define $\tau(p)(0)=n$. Assume that $s=\tau(p){\upharpoonright}\ell$ has already been defined. Then, wait for the first $t\in{\omega}$ such that $B_{p(t)}\subseteq U_{s{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}n}$ for some $n\in{\omega}$. If there are such $t$ and $n$, define $\tau(p)(\ell)=n$. Continue this procedure. Clearly $\tau$ is continuous. If $\delta^\mathcal{U}_{\rm nbhd}(p)=x\in U_s=\bigcup_nU_{s{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}n}$, one can find $t$ such that $x\in B_{p(t)}\subseteq U_{s{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}n}$ for some $n$ since $\mathcal{N}_x^\mathcal{B}$ is a local basis of $\mathcal{X}$ at $x$. Therefore, if $p\in{\rm dom}(\delta^\mathcal{U}_{\rm nbhd})$, one can inductively show that $\tau(p)\in{\omega}^{\omega}$, and it is easy to check that $\delta^\mathcal{U}_{\rm nbhd}=\delta^\mathcal{U}_{\rm Sus}(\tau(p))$.
\[obs:admissible-preserve-m-deg\] Let $\mathcal{X}$ be a Polish space. For any function $f\colon\mathcal{X\to\mathbb{R}}$, the $\mathbf{m}$-degree of $f\circ\delta\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to\mathbb{R}$ is independent of the choice of a total admissible representation $\delta$.
Let $\delta$ and $\gamma$ be total admissible representations of $\mathcal{X}$. By admissibility, $\gamma=\delta\circ\theta$ for some continuous function $\theta$. Thus, ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f\circ\gamma}}(\langle p,q\rangle{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}X)={\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}(pq\gamma(X))={\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}(\langle p,q\rangle{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}\delta\circ\theta(X))={\mathrm{Lev}_{f\circ\delta}}(\langle p,q\rangle{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}\theta(X))$. Hence, ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f\circ\gamma}}\leq^{{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}_{mw}{\mathrm{Lev}_{f\circ\delta}}$.
Hence, given a Polish space $\mathcal{X}$, by Lemma \[lem:total-open-admissible\], one can fix a total open continuous admissible representation $\delta$ of $\mathcal{X}$. Then, the $\mathbf{m}$-degree of $f\colon\mathcal{X}\to\mathbb{R}$ is defined as the $\mathbf{m}$-degree of $f\circ\delta\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to\mathbb{R}$.
\[obs:semi-well-order-m-deg\] The ${\mathbf{m}}$-degrees of real-valued functions on Polish spaces form a semi-well-order of length $\Theta$.
Baire one functions
-------------------
### Bourgain rank
Let $\mathcal{X}$ be a Polish space. Then, given $f\colon \mathcal{X}\to\mathbb{R}$ and $x\in\mathcal{X}$, we define the following. $$\overline{f}(x)=\inf_{J\ni x}\sup_{y\in J}f(y),\qquad\underline{f}(x)=\sup_{J\ni x}\inf_{y\in J}f(y),$$ where $J$ ranges over open sets. It is easy to see that $\underline{f}(x)\leq f(x)\leq\overline{f}(x)$. Then, given $P\subseteq\mathcal{X}$, the $(f;p,q)$-derivative of $P$ is defined as follows. $$D_{f,p,q}P=\{x\in P:\underline{(f{\upharpoonright}P)}(x)\leq p<q\leq\overline{(f{\upharpoonright}P)}(x).\}$$
Let $|x|_{f,p,q}$ be the least $\alpha$ such that $x\not\in D^\alpha_{f,p,q}\mathcal{X}$. Let $\alpha(f,p,q)$ be the least $\alpha$ such that $D^\alpha_{f,p,q}\mathcal{X}=\emptyset$. Note that $\alpha(f,p,q)=\sup_{x\in\mathcal{X}}|x|_{f,p,q}$. Then the [*Bourgain rank of* ]{}$f$ is defined by $\alpha(f)=\sup_{p<q}\alpha(f,p,q)$.
By definition, $|x|_{f,p,q}$ is always a successor ordinal. If the domain is not compact, the rank $\alpha(f,p,q)$ can be a limit ordinal. In this case, there is no $x$ such that $|x|_{f,p,q}=\alpha(f,p,q)$. Hence, if the domain is not compact, $\alpha(f)=\alpha(f,p,q)$ can happen even if $\alpha(f)$ is limit.
### Sided-conditions {#sec:sided-condition}
Hereafter we use the symbol $P^\nu_{f,p,q}$ to denote $D^\nu_{f,p,q}\mathcal{X}$.
\[def:DDW-sided-conditions\] Let $f\colon \mathcal{X}\to\mathbb{R}$ be a Baire-one function.
1. $f$ is [*two-sided*]{} if there are rationals $p<q$ such that $\alpha(f,p,q)=\alpha(f)$ and that for any $\nu<\alpha(f)$, $f(x)\leq p<q\leq f(y)$ for some $x,y\in P^\nu_{f,p,q}$.
2. If $f$ is not two-sided, it is called [*one-sided*]{}.
3. $f$ is [*left-sided*]{} if for any rationals $p<q$ with $\alpha(f,p,q)=\alpha(f)$, there is $\nu<\alpha(f)$ such that $P^\nu_{f,p,q}\subseteq\{f<p\}$.
4. $f$ is [*right-sided*]{} if for any rationals $p<q$ with $\alpha(f,p,q)=\alpha(f)$, there is $\nu<\alpha(f)$ such that $P^\nu_{f,p,q}\subseteq\{f>q\}$.
5. $f$ is [*irreducible*]{} if there are rationals $p<q$ such that $\alpha(f)=\alpha(f;p,q)$. Otherwise, $f$ is called [*reducible*]{}.
\[obs:Bourgain-left-right-reducible\] Let $f\colon \mathcal{X}\to\mathbb{R}$ be a Baire-one function.
1. If $\alpha(f)$ is a successor ordinal, then $f$ is irreducible.
2. If $\alpha(f)$ is a limit ordinal, and $f$ is irreducible, then $f$ is two-sided.
3. $f$ is both left- and right-sided if and only if $f$ is reducible.
\(1) Since $\alpha(f)=\sup_{p<q}\alpha(f;p,q)$, if $\alpha(f)$, then there must exist $p<q$ such that $\alpha(f)=\alpha(f;p,q)$.
\(2) Let $p<q$ be rationals such that $\alpha(f,p,q)=\alpha(f)$. For any $\nu<\alpha(f)$ if $\nu<\xi<\alpha(f)$, then there exists $x$ such that $|x|_{f,p,q}=\xi$. Therefore, for any open neighborhood $J$ of $x$, there are $y,z\in J\cap P^\nu$ such that $f(y)\leq p<q\leq f(z)$.
\(3) By definition, if there is no $p<q$ such that $\alpha(f)=\alpha(f;p,q)$, then $f$ is one-sided, and moreover, left- and right-sided. For the converse, let $f$ be both left- and right-sided. Suppose for the sake of contradiction that $f$ is irreducible. Since $f$ is one-sided and irreducible, by (2), $\alpha(f)$ must be a successor ordinal, $\alpha(f)=\nu+1$ say. Then $P^\nu_{f,p,q}\not=\emptyset$. Since $f$ is both left- and right-sided, we also have $P^\nu_{f,p,q}\subseteq\{p<f<q\}$. Therefore, $x\in P^\nu_{f,p,q}$ implies $p<f(x)<q$, and then let $r$ be such that $f(x)\leq r<q$. Then, we have $\nu+1=\alpha(f)=\alpha(f;p,q)\leq\alpha(f;r,q)$ and $$x\in P^\nu_{f,p,q}\subseteq P^\nu_{f,r,q}\not\subseteq\{f>r\}.$$ Therefore, $f$ is not right-sided.
Define the [*type of $f$*]{} as follows: If $f$ is two-sided, define ${\rm type}(f)={\tt t}$. If $f$ is one-sided, but neither left- nor right-sided, define ${\rm type}(f)={\tt o}$. If $f$ is left-sided, but not right-sided, define ${\rm type}(f)={\tt l}$. If $f$ is right-sided, but not left-sided, define ${\rm type}(f)={\tt r}$. If $f$ is both left- and right-sided (that is, $f$ is reducible by Observation \[obs:Bourgain-left-right-reducible\] (3)), define ${\rm type}(f)={\tt f}$. We define the order on these types as follows: $${\tt f}<{\tt l},{\tt r}<{\tt o}<{\tt t}.$$
### Open continuous surjection
\[lem:Bourgain-rank\] Let $\delta\colon\mathcal{Z}\to\mathcal{X}$ be an open continuous surjection, and $f\colon\mathcal{X}\to\mathbb{R}$ be a Baire-one function. Then, $|x|_{f\circ\delta,p,q}=|\delta(x)|_{f,p,q}$. In particular, $\alpha(f)=\alpha(f\circ\delta)$ and ${\rm type}(f)={\rm type}(f\circ\delta)$.
We claim that $\delta^{-1}[D_{f,p,q}P]=D_{f\circ\delta,p,q}\delta^{-1}[P]$ for any $P\subseteq\mathcal{X}$. If $z\in\delta^{-1}[D_{f,p,q}P]$, then there is an open neighborhood $J$ of $\delta(z)$ in $P$ such that $f(x)\leq p$ and $f(y)\geq q$ for some $x,y\in J\cap P$. Then, $\delta^{-1}[J]$ is an open neighborhood of $z$ in $\delta^{-1}[P]$, and since $\delta$ is surjective, there are $u,v\in\delta^{-1}[J]\cap\delta^{-1}[P]$ such that $\delta(u)=x$ and $\delta(v)=y$. Since $f\circ\delta(u)\leq p$ and $f\circ\delta(v)\geq q$, we have $z\in D_{f\circ\delta,p,q}\delta^{-1}[P]$. Conversely, if $z\in D_{f\circ\delta,p,q}\delta^{-1}[P]$, then there is an open neighborhood $J$ of $z$ in $\delta^{-1}[P]$ such that $f\circ\delta(x)\leq p$ and $f\circ\delta(y)\geq q$ for some $x,y\in J\cap\delta^{-1}[P]$. Since $\delta$ is an open map, $\delta[J]$ is an open neighborhood of $\delta(z)$, and we also have $\delta(x),\delta(y)\in\delta[J]\cap P$. Consequently, $\delta(z)\in D_{f,p,q}P$, and thus $z\in\delta^{-1}[D_{f,p,q}P]$. This verifies the claim.
We will inductively show that $\delta^{-1}[D_{f,p,q}^\xi\mathcal{X}]=D_{f\circ\delta,p,q}^\xi\mathcal{Z}$ for any $\xi$. It is obvious for a limit step. For a successor ordinal $\xi+1$, $$D_{f\circ\delta,p,q}^{\xi+1}\mathcal{Z}=D_{f\circ\delta,p,q}\delta^{-1}[D_{f,p,q}^\xi\mathcal{X}]=\delta^{-1}[D_{f,p,q}D_{f,p,q}^\xi\mathcal{X}]=\delta^{-1}[D_{f,p,q}^{\xi+1}\mathcal{X}].$$
The first equality follows from the induction hypothesis, and the second equality follows from the previous claim with $P=D_{f,p,q}^\xi\mathcal{X}$. Consequently, $x\in D^\xi_{f\circ\delta,p,q}\mathcal{Z}$ iff $\delta(x)\in D^\xi_{f,p,q}\mathcal{X}$, and hence $|x|_{f\circ\delta,p,q}=|\delta(x)|_{f,p,q}$ as desired.
### The Day-Downey-Westrick Theorem
\[thm:Day-Downey-Westrick\] Let $\mathcal{X}$ and $\mathcal{Y}$ be Polish spaces and let $f\colon \mathcal{X}\to\mathbb{R}$ and $g\colon \mathcal{Y}\to\mathbb{R}$ be Baire-one functions. Then, $f\leq_\mathbf{m}g$ if and only if either $\alpha(f)<\alpha(g)$ holds or both $\alpha(f)=\alpha(g)$ and ${\rm type}(f)\leq{\rm type}(g)$ hold.
By Observation \[obs:admissible-preserve-m-deg\] and Lemma \[lem:Bourgain-rank\], one can assume that $\mathcal{X}=\mathcal{Y}={\omega}^{\omega}$ by considering $f\circ\delta_\mathcal{X}$ and $g\circ\delta_\mathcal{Y}$ instead of $f$ and $y$, where $\delta_\mathcal{X}$ and $\delta_\mathcal{Y}$ are total open admissible representations of $\mathcal{X}$ and $\mathcal{Y}$ ensured by Lemma \[lem:total-open-admissible\], respectively.
For the left-to-right direction, it is not hard to check that a straightforward modification of the argument in Day-Downey-Westrick [@DDW] gives us the desired condition.
For the right-to-left direction, assume that either $\alpha(f)<\alpha(g)$ holds or both $\alpha(f)=\alpha(g)$ and ${\rm type}(f)\leq{\rm type}(g)$ hold. Given $p<q$ we need to find $r<s$ satisfying the following property: For any $x$, there is $y$ such that $$\begin{aligned}
\label{equ:DDW-initial-condition}
|x|_{f,p,q}\leq |y|_{g,r,s},\mbox{ and }{\rm Lev}_f(x;p,q)\leq_{\mathbf{2}_\bot}{\rm Lev}_g(y;r,s).\end{aligned}$$
If $\alpha(f;p,q)<\alpha(g)$, then there are $r<s$ such that $\alpha(f;p,q)<\alpha(g;r,s)$. Choose such $r<s$. In particular, if either $\alpha(f)<\alpha(g)$ or ${\rm type}(f)={\tt f}$, then we get (\[equ:DDW-initial-condition\]). Now assume $\alpha(f)=\alpha(g)$ and ${\rm type}(f)\not={\tt f}$. In this case, there are $p<q$ such that $\alpha(f;p,q)=\alpha(f)=\alpha(g)$.
The rest of the proof is done by the argument as in Day-Downey-Westrick [@DDW].
Note that Lemma \[lem:Bourgain-rank\] only requires $\delta$ to be an open continuous surjection (that is, $\delta$ is not necessarily admissible). Hence, Theorem \[thm:Day-Downey-Westrick\] implies that the $\mathbf{m}$-degree of a Baire-one function $f\circ\delta$ is independent of the choice of an open continuous surjection $\delta$.
One of the most important conclusions of Theorems \[thm:mthm1\] and \[thm:Day-Downey-Westrick\] is that one can characterize the Bourgain rank in terms of the descriptive complexity as follows:
\[cor:Wadge-Bourgain\] Let $\delta\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to\mathcal{X}$ be an open continuous surjection, and $f\colon \mathcal{X}\to\mathbb{R}$ be a Baire-one function. Then,
1. ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f\circ\delta}}$ is either $\Sigma_\xi^{{\diamondsuit}}$- or $\Pi_\xi^{{\diamondsuit}}$-complete if and only if $\alpha(f)=\xi+1$ and either $f$ is left- or right-sided.
2. ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f\circ\delta}}$ is $\Delta_\xi^{{\diamondsuit}}$-complete and $m$-$\sigma$-ji if and only if $\alpha(f)=\xi$ and $f$ is two-sided.
3. ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f\circ\delta}}$ is $\Delta_\xi^{{\diamondsuit}}$-complete and $m$-$\sigma$-jr if and only if $\alpha(f)=\xi$ and either ${\rm type}(f)={\sf o}$ (if $\xi$ is successor) or ${\rm type}(f)={\sf f}$ (if $\xi$ is limit).
By Lemma \[lem:Bourgain-rank\], we can assume that $\mathcal{X}={\omega}^{\omega}$ and $\delta={\rm id}$. By induction. If $\alpha(f)$ is successor, then ${\rm type}(f)\in\{{\tt l},{\tt r},{\tt o},{\tt t}\}$ by Observation \[obs:Bourgain-left-right-reducible\] (1). If $\alpha(f)$ is limit, then ${\rm type}(f)\in\{{\tt f},{\tt t}\}$ by Observation \[obs:Bourgain-left-right-reducible\] (2) and (3). Moreover, it is easy to see that every such type is realized by some function whenever $\alpha(f)>1$. One can see that if $\alpha(f)=1$ then ${\rm type}(f)\in\{{\tt o},{\tt t}\}$, that is, either $f$ is constant or $f$ is nonconstant and continuous.
Let $\xi$ be a limit ordinal. If $\xi=0$, put ${\tt c}={\tt o}$; otherwise put ${\tt c}={\tt f}$. By Theorem \[thm:Day-Downey-Westrick\], one can easily see that for any $n\in{\omega}$, $$\begin{aligned}
\mbox{${\rm rank}_\mathbf{m}(f)=\xi+3n$} & \iff \mbox{$\alpha(f)=1+\xi+n$ and ${\rm type}(f)={\tt c}$}\\
\mbox{${\rm rank}_\mathbf{m}(f)=\xi+3n+1$} & \iff \mbox{$\alpha(f)=1+\xi+n$ and ${\rm type}(f)={\tt t}$}\\
\mbox{${\rm rank}_\mathbf{m}(f)=\xi+3n+2$} & \iff \mbox{$\alpha(f)=1+\xi+n+1$ and ${\rm type}(f)\in\{{\tt l},{\tt r}\}$,}\end{aligned}$$ where ${\rm rank}_\mathbf{m}(f)$ denotes the $\mathbf{m}$-rank of $f$. The proof of Theorems \[thm:mthm1\] and Theorem \[thm:main-theorem1\] shows that $$\begin{aligned}
\mbox{${\rm rank}_\mathbf{m}(f)=\xi+3n$} & \iff \mbox{${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ is $\Delta_{1+\xi+n}^{{\diamondsuit}}$-complete and $m$-jr}\\
\mbox{${\rm rank}_\mathbf{m}(f)=\xi+3n+1$} & \iff \mbox{${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ is $\Delta_{1+\xi+n}^{{\diamondsuit}}$-complete and $m$-ji}\\
\mbox{${\rm rank}_\mathbf{m}(f)=\xi+3n+2$} & \iff \mbox{${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ is $\Sigma_{1+\xi+n}^{{\diamondsuit}}$- or $\Pi_{1+\xi+n}^{{\diamondsuit}}$-complete.}\end{aligned}$$
This concludes the proof.
### Separation rank
We characterize the Bourgain rank in the context of the Hausdorff difference hierarchy by modifying the $\alpha_1$-rank introduced by Elekes-Kiss-Vidnyánszky [@EKV16]. For $\mathbf{\Gamma}\in\{\mathbf{\Sigma},\mathbf{\Pi},\mathbf{\Delta}\}$, let $\xi$-$\mathbf{\Gamma}^0_1$ be the corresponding pointclasses in the $\xi^{th}$ level of the Hausdorff difference hierarchy, that is, $\xi$-$\mathbf{\Gamma}^0_1$ is equal to $\Gamma_\xi$. For a Baire-one function $f\colon{\omega}^{\omega}\to\mathbb{R}$ and rationals $p<q$, let $\alpha^{\rm sep}_1(f;p,q)$ be the least ordinal $\alpha$ such that an $\alpha$-$\mathbf{\Delta}^0_1$ set separates $\{f\leq p\}$ from $\{f\geq q\}$. Then, we define $$\alpha^{\rm sep}_1(f)=\sup_{p<q}\alpha^{\rm sep}_1(f;p,q).$$
\[obs:sep-and-Wadge\] Let $f\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to\mathbb{R}$ be a Baire-one function. Then, $\alpha^{\rm sep}_1(f)\leq\xi$ iff ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}\leq^{{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}_{mw}E_\xi$, where $E_\xi$ is an $m$-$\sigma$-ji $\Delta_\xi$-complete subset of ${\omega}^{\omega}$.
It is clear that a $\xi$-$\mathbf{\Delta}^0_1$ set (i.e., a $\Delta_\xi$ set) separates $\{f\leq p\}$ and $\{f\geq q\}$ for any $p,q$ if and only if ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ is ${{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$-Wadge reducible to a $\Delta_\xi$-complete set, and it is equivalent to saying that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ is ${{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$-$m$-Wadge reducible to an $m$-$\sigma$-ji $\Delta_\xi$-complete set.
Generally, for a Baire-one function $f\colon\mathcal{X}\to\mathbb{R}$, the [*pre-separation rank*]{} $\alpha^{\rm sep}(f)$ is defined by $$\alpha^{\rm sep}(f)=\min_\delta\alpha_1^{\rm sep}(f\circ\delta),$$ where $\delta$ ranges over open continuous surjections from ${\omega}^{\omega}$ onto $\mathcal{X}$.
\[prop:Bourgain-equal-sep\] $\alpha(f)=\alpha^{\rm sep}(f)$.
Let $\delta$ be an open continuous surjection witnessing that $\alpha^{\rm sep}(f)=\alpha_1^{\rm sep}(f\circ\delta)$. By Corollary \[cor:Wadge-Bourgain\], if $\xi$ is successer, $\xi=\eta+1$ say, $\alpha(f)=\xi$ iff $S_{f\circ\delta}$ is $\Gamma$-complete for some $\Gamma\in\{\Sigma_\eta,\Pi_\eta,\Delta_{\eta+1}^{jr},\Delta_{\eta+1}\}$. If $\xi$ is limit, $\alpha(f)=\xi$ iff $S_{f\circ\delta}$ is either $\Delta_{\xi}^{jr}$- or $\Delta_{\xi}$-complete. In any case, $\alpha(f)\leq\xi$ iff $S_{f\circ\delta}\leq^{{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}_{mw}E_\xi$. By Observation \[obs:sep-and-Wadge\], the latter is equivalent to saying that $\alpha^{\rm sep}_1(f\circ\delta)\leq\xi$. By our choice of $\delta$, we have $\alpha^{\rm sep}(f)=\alpha^{\rm sep}_1(f\circ\delta)$. Consequently, $\alpha(f)\leq\xi$ iff $\alpha^{\rm sep}(f)\leq\xi$.
By Lemma \[lem:Bourgain-rank\], the above proposition shows that $\alpha(f)=\alpha^{\rm sep}_1(f\circ\delta)$ holds for any open continuous surjection $\delta$. In particular, this implies that the definition of $\alpha^{\rm sep}(f)$ is independent of the choice of $\delta$.
$\mathbf{T}$-degrees and the Martin ordering {#sec:Martin-conjecture}
============================================
In this section, we will see a strong connection between the structure of Day-Downey-Westrick’s $\mathbf{T}$-degrees of real-valued functions [@DDW] and the [*Martin ordering on the uniform Turing degree invariant functions*]{}. Then, by combining with Becker’s result [@Becker88], we will see that the $\mathbf{T}$-degrees of real-valued functions form a well-order of type $\Theta$.
Reducibility notions {#sec:reducibility-notions}
--------------------
There are a number of works on Wadge-like classifications of functions on ${\omega}^{\omega}$. For instance, Carroy [@Carroy13] adopted [*continuous strong Weihrauch reducibility*]{} as a tool to provide a reasonable classification of functions on ${\omega}^{\omega}$, where for $f,g\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to{\omega}^{\omega}$, we say that $f$ is continuously strongly Weihrauch reducible to $g$ (written as $f\leq^c_{sW}g$) if there are continuous functions $\Phi,\Psi\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to{\omega}^{\omega}$ such that $$f=\Phi\circ g\circ\Psi.$$ Subsequently, Day-Downey-Westrick [@DDW] adopted [*parallelized continuous strong (p.c.s.) Weihrauch reducibility*]{} as a formalization of topological “Turing reducibility” for real-valued functions. Given a function $h\colon \mathcal{X}\to\mathcal{Y}$, define the [*parallelization of $h$*]{} as the following function $\widehat{h}\colon \mathcal{X}^{\omega}\to\mathcal{Y}^{\omega}$: $$\widehat{h}(\langle x_n:n\in{\omega}\rangle)=\langle h(x_n):n\in{\omega}\rangle.$$
We use $\leq{^{\widehat{c}}_{sW}}$ to denote the p.c.s. Weihrauch reducibility, that is, $f\leq{^{\widehat{c}}_{sW}}g$ iff $f\leq_{sW}^c\widehat{g}$. It is equivalent to say that there are continuous functions $\Phi:\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{\omega}\to\mathbb{R}$ and $\Psi\colon {\omega}\times{\omega}^{\omega}\to{\omega}^{\omega}$ such that $$(\forall X\in{\omega}^{\omega})\;f(X)=\Phi\left(\langle g(\Psi(i,X)):i\in{\omega}\rangle\right).$$
We connect the reducibility notion $\leq{^{\widehat{c}}_{sW}}$ with the [*uniform Martin conjecture*]{} [@Steel82; @SlaSte88]. To explain this, we need to introduce several notions from computability theory. For $X,Y\in 2^{\omega}$, we say that $Y$ is Turing reducible to $X$ (written $Y\leq_TX$) if there is a partial computable function $\Phi:\subseteq 2^{\omega}\to 2^{\omega}$ such that $\Phi(X)=Y$. We write $X\equiv_TY$ if $X\leq_TY$ and $Y\leq_TX$. We fix an effective enumeration of all partial computable functions. If $\Phi$ in the definition of Turing reducibility is given as the $e$-th partial computable function, then we say that $Y\leq_TX$ via $e$.
In 1960s, Martin conjectured that [*natural*]{} Turing degrees are well-ordered, and the successor rank is given by the Turing jump. Usually, “natural” means that relativizability and Turing invariance, but we here also require the uniformity on Turing invariance.
A function $f\colon 2^{\omega}\to 2^{\omega}$ is [*uniformly Turing degree invariant*]{} (UI) if there is a function $u\colon {\omega}^2\to{\omega}^2$ such that $$X\equiv_TY\mbox{ via }(d,e)\;\Longrightarrow\;f(X)\equiv_Tf(Y)\mbox{ via }u(d,e).$$
A function $f\colon 2^{\omega}\to 2^{\omega}$ is [*uniformly Turing order preserving*]{} (UOP) if there is a function $u\colon {\omega}\to{\omega}$ such that $$X\leq_TY\mbox{ via }e\;\Longrightarrow\;f(X)\leq_Tf(Y)\mbox{ via }u(e).$$
For functions $f,g\colon 2^{\omega}\to 2^{\omega}$, we say that [*$f$ is Martin reducible to $g$*]{} (or [*$f$ is Turing reducible to $g$ a.e.*]{}; written $f\leq_T^{\triangledown}g$) if $$(\exists C\in 2^{\omega})(\forall X\geq_TC)\;f(X)\leq_Tg(X).$$
It is clear that every UOP function is UI. The converse also holds up to the Turing equivalence a.e.
Every UI function is Turing equivalent to a UOP function a.e.
However, this reducibility notion $\leq_T^{\triangledown}$ is badly behaved for constant functions. In this article, we use the following variant of $\leq_T^{\triangledown}$:
For functions $f,g\colon 2^{\omega}\to 2^{\omega}$, we write $f\leq_\mathbf{T}^{\triangledown}g$ if $$(\exists C\in 2^{\omega})(\forall X\geq_TC)\;f(X)\leq_Tg(X)\oplus C.$$
A function $f\colon 2^{\omega}\to 2^{\omega}$ is [*increasing a.e.*]{} if there is $C\in 2^{\omega}$ such that $f(X)\geq_TX$ for all $X\geq_TC$. A function $f\colon 2^{\omega}\to 2^{\omega}$ is [*constant a.e.*]{} if there is $C\in 2^{\omega}$ such that $f(X)\equiv_TC$ for all $X\geq_TC$.
\[fact:Slaman-Steel\] For a UI function $f\colon 2^{\omega}\to 2^{\omega}$, either $f$ is constant a.e. or $f$ is increasing a.e.
\[obs:bold-T-equal-light-T\] Let $f,g\colon 2^{\omega}\to 2^{\omega}$ be UI functions. If $g$ is not constant a.e., then $$f\leq_T^{\triangledown}g\iff f\leq_\mathbf{T}^{\triangledown}g.$$
Assume that $f\leq_\mathbf{T}^{\triangledown}g$ via $C$. By Fact \[fact:Slaman-Steel\], $g$ is increasing a.e. Therefore, there is $D\geq_TC$ such that $g(X)\geq_TX$ for all $X\geq_TD$. For such $X$, $f(X)\leq_Tg(X)\oplus C\leq_T g(X)$. Hence, $f\leq_T^{\triangledown}g$.
The $\leq^{\triangledown}_\mathbf{T}$-degrees of UOP functions forms a well-order of height $\Theta$, and the successor rank is given by the Turing jump (cf. Steel [@Steel82] and Becker [@Becker88]).
By ${\rm UOP}$ we denote the collection of UOP functions, and by $\mathcal{F}$ we denote the collection of real-valued functions on ${\omega}^{\omega}$. In this section, we will show the following.
\[thm:pcsW-equal-Martin\] The identity map induces an isomorphism between quotients of $({\rm UOP},\leq_\mathbf{T}^{\triangledown})$ and $(\mathcal{F},\leq{^{\widehat{c}}_{sW}})$.
As a corollary, by Observation \[obs:bold-T-equal-light-T\], the identity map induces an isomorphism between the Martin ordering on the UOP operators which is not constant a.e. and the parallel continuous strong Weihrauch degrees of real-valued non-constant functions. Theorem \[thm:pcsW-equal-Martin\] also concludes the following.
\[thm:pcsW-equal-Martin2\] The p.c.s. Weihrauch degrees of real-valued functions on ${\omega}^{\omega}$ form a well-order of type $\Theta$. Moreover, if $g\colon 2^{\omega}\to 2^{\omega}$ has nonzero p.c.s. Weihrauch rank $\alpha$, then $\widehat{g}'$ has p.c.s. Weihrauch rank $\alpha+1$, where $h'(x)$ is defined as the Turing jump of $h(x)$.
In particular, for any parallelizable function $g$ (that is, $g\equiv_{sW}^c\widehat{g}$), if $g$ has p.c.s. Weihrauch rank $\alpha$, then $g'$ has p.c.s. Weihrauch rank $\alpha+1$.
Injectivity
-----------
We first show that the identity map gives an embedding of $({\rm UOP},\leq_T^{\triangledown})$ into $(\mathcal{F},\leq{^{\widehat{c}}_{sW}})$. We will use the following notion. A [*uniformly pointed perfect tree*]{} (u.p.p. tree) is a perfect tree $T\subseteq 2^{<{\omega}}$ such that $T\leq_TT[X]$ via some index $e$ independent of $X\in 2^{\omega}$, where we often think of a perfect tree $T$ as a continuous embedding $T[\cdot]\colon 2^{\omega}\to 2^{\omega}$, that is, $T[X]$ is the $X$-th infinite path through $T$.
\[fact:Martin\] For any countable partition $(P_i)_{i\in{\omega}}$ of $2^{\omega}$, there is $i\in{\omega}$ such that $P_i$ includes the set of all infinite paths through a u.p.p. tree.
\[lem:UOP-parallelizable\] Assume that $f$ and $g$ are UOP functions. Then, $$f\leq_\mathbf{T}^{\triangledown}g\iff f\leq_{sW}^cg \iff f\leq_{sW}^c\widehat{g}.$$
Assume that $f\leq_\mathbf{T}^{\triangledown}g$ via $C$. By Fact \[fact:Martin\], there are a u.p.p. tree $T$ and an index $e$ such that for any $X$, $f(T[X])\leq_Tg(T[X])\oplus C$ via $\Phi_e$. Note that $\Phi_e^C\colon Z\mapsto\Phi_e(Z\oplus C)$ is continuous. Assume that $f$ is UOP via $u$. For an index $d$ witnessing $X\leq_TT[X]$, we have $f(X)\leq_Tf(T[X])$ via $\Phi_{u(d)}$. Then, we have $$f(X)=\Phi_{u(d)}(f(T[X]))=\Phi_{u(d)}(\Phi_e(g(T[X])\oplus C))=\Phi_{u(d)}(\Phi_e^C(g(T[X]))).$$ This concludes that $f=\Phi_{u(d)}\circ\Phi_e^C\circ g\circ T$, and thus, $f\leq_{sW}^cg$ as desired.
Conversely, assume that $f\leq_{sW}^c\widehat{g}$. Then, there are continuous functions $\Phi,\Psi$ such that $f(X)=\Phi(\langle g(\Psi(i,X))\rangle_i)$ for all $X$. Let $C$ be an oracle such that $\Phi$ and $\Psi$ are $C$-computable. If $X\geq_TC$, then $\Psi(i,X)$ is $X$-computable uniformly in $i$, that is, there is a computable function $p$ such that $\Psi(i,X)\leq_TX$ via $\Phi_{p(i)}$. Let $u$ witness that $g$ is UOP. Then, if $X\geq_TC$, then we have $g(\Psi(i,X))\leq_Tg(X)$ via $\Phi_{u\circ p(i)}$. Therefore, $\bigoplus_ig(\Psi(i,X))\leq_Tg(X)\oplus u$. Then, for any $X\geq_TC$, $$f(X)=\Phi\left(\langle g(\Psi(i,X))\rangle_i\right)\leq_Tg(X)\oplus u\oplus C.$$ Consequently, we get that $f\leq_\mathbf{T}^{\triangledown}g$.
Surjectivity
------------
To prove Theorem \[thm:pcsW-equal-Martin\], it remains to show that every function $f\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to\mathbb{R}$ is $\equiv{^{\widehat{c}}_{sW}}$-equivalent to a UOP function. Clearly, every constant function is UOP, and any two constant functions are $\equiv_\mathbf{T}^{\triangledown}$-equivalent, and $\equiv{^{\widehat{c}}_{sW}}$-equivalent. We hereafter assume that $f\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to\mathbb{R}$ is not constant.
### Continuous functions
By Theorem \[thm:main-theorem1\], the Wadge degrees of ${{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}$-valued functions of the form ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ can be identified with the Wadge degrees of subsets of ${\omega}^{\omega}$. For $\mathbf{m}$-degrees, recall that each selfdual degree splits into two degrees, but this spliting happens only for $\mathbf{m}$-degrees. Actually, one can see that parallel continuous strong Weihrauch reducibility for non-constant functions is coarser than Wadge reducibility as follows.
\[lem:wadge-implies-pcsW\] Assume that $g$ is not constant. If ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}\leq_w{\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}$, then $f\leq_{sW}^c\widehat{g}$.
To show Lemma \[lem:wadge-implies-pcsW\], we need the following sublemma. We write $f\leq_W^cg$ if $f\leq_{sW}^c({\rm id},g)$, where given functions $f,h$, define $(f,h)\colon x\mapsto(f(x),h(x))$.
\[lem:remove-strong\] Let $f,g\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to\mathbb{R}$ be functions. Assume that $g$ is not constant. Then, $f\leq_{sW}^c\widehat{g}$ if and only if $f\leq_{W}^c\widehat{g}$.
It suffices to show that $({\rm id},\widehat{g})\leq_{sW}^c\widehat{g}$. Since $g$ is not constant, there are $Y_0,Y_1\in{\omega}^{\omega}$ such that $g(Y_0)\not=g(Y_1)$. Let $U_0,U_1$ be disjoint rational open intervals such that $g(Y_i)\subseteq U_i$ for each $i<2$. Given $X\in 2^{\omega}$, define $\rho(i,X)=Y_{X(i)}$. We also define $\tau(\bigoplus_i Z_i)(n)=i$ if $Z_n\in U_i$. Then, $$X=\tau\left(\bigoplus_ig(Y_{X(i)})\right)=\tau\left(\bigoplus_ig\circ\rho(i,X)\right).$$ This shows that ${\rm id}\leq_{sW}^c\widehat{g}$. Consequently, $({\rm id},\widehat{g})\leq_{sW}^c(\widehat{g},\widehat{g})\equiv_{sW}\widehat{g}$.
Note that the outer reduction $\tau$ in the proof of Lemma \[lem:remove-strong\] is clearly computable. Later we will use this observation to show Theorem \[thm:pcsW-equal-Martin2\].
Assume that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}\leq_w{\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}$. Then, there are continuous functions $r,s\colon \mathbb{Q}^2\times{\omega}^{\omega}\to\mathbb{Q}$ and $\psi\colon \mathbb{Q}^2\times{\omega}^{\omega}\to{\omega}^{\omega}$ such that for any $p<q$ and $X\in{\omega}^{\omega}$, $$\begin{aligned}
f(X)\leq p\;&\Longrightarrow\;g(\psi(p,q,X))\leq r(p,q,X),\\
f(X)\geq q\;&\Longrightarrow\;g(\psi(p,q,X))\geq s(p,q,X).\end{aligned}$$ Then, one can show that there is a continuous function $\Phi$ such that $f(X)=\Phi(X,\bigoplus_{p,q}g(\psi(p,q,X)))$ for all $X$. Consequently, $f\leq_{W}^c\widehat{g}$, and thus $f\leq_{sW}^c\widehat{g}$ by Lemma \[lem:remove-strong\].
By Lemma \[lem:wadge-implies-pcsW\], the $\equiv{^{\widehat{c}}_{sW}}$-degrees of continuous functions consist only of two degrees, that is, if $f$ and $g$ are continuous, but not constant, then $f\equiv{^{\widehat{c}}_{sW}}g$. In particular, $f\equiv{^{\widehat{c}}_{sW}}{\rm id}$, where note that the identity map ${\rm id}$ is clearly a UOP function. Hence, it remains to consider the case that $f$ is discontinuous.
### Nonselfdual functions
Assume that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ is nonselfdual. As in Becker [@Becker88], we first assign a UOP function to each nonselfdual Wadge degree. Following Becker [@Becker88 Definiton 2.2], we say that a pointclass $\Gamma$ is [*reasonable*]{} if $\Gamma$ is ${\omega}$-parametrized, contains all computable sets, and has the substitution property. Given a $\Gamma$-indexing $U$, we define $J_\Gamma^U\colon 2^{\omega}\to 2^{\omega}$ as follows: $$J^U_\Gamma(X)=\{\langle m,n\rangle:U(m,n,X)\}.$$
For any reasonable pointclass $\Gamma$ and its indexing $U$, $J_\Gamma^U$ is a UOP function which is increasing a.e. Moreover, the $\equiv_T^{\triangledown}$-degree of $J_\Gamma^U$ is independent of the choice of $U$.
As in Section \[section:proper-three-Wadge\], given a pointclass $\Gamma$, we define $\Gamma^{{\diamondsuit}}=\{{\mathcal{A}}:{\omega}^{\omega}\to{{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}\mid(\exists S\in\Gamma)\;{\mathcal{A}}\leq_wS\}$.
For any reasonable pointclass $\Gamma$, if ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ is $\Gamma^{{\diamondsuit}}$-complete, then $f\equiv{^{\widehat{c}}_{sW}}J_\Gamma$.
Let $U$ be a $\Gamma$-indexing, which is, in particular, $\Gamma$-complete. Since ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}\in\Gamma^{{\diamondsuit}}$, there is a continuous function $\theta$ such that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}(\langle p,q\rangle{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}X)\leq_{{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}U\circ\theta(p,q,X)$. Then $\theta(p,q,X)$ is of the form $(\tau_{pq}(X),\Psi_{pq}(X))$, where $\tau_{pq}(X)\in{\omega}^2$ and $\Psi_{pq}(X)\in{\omega}^{\omega}$. Thus, ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}(\langle p,q\rangle{\mbox{}^\smallfrown}X)\leq_{{\mathbf{2}_\bot}}J^U_\Gamma(\Psi_{pq}(X))(\tau_{pq}(X))$. Then, one can construct a continuous function $\Phi$ such that $f(X)=\Phi(\bigoplus_{p,q}J^U_\Gamma\circ\Psi_{pq}(X))$. Consequently, $f\leq_{sW}^c\widehat{J_\Gamma}$.
Conversely, since $U\in\Gamma$ and ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ is $\Gamma^{{\diamondsuit}}$-complete, there is a continuous function $\eta$ such that $U={\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}\circ\eta$. By a similar argument as above, one can show that $J_\Gamma\leq_{sW}^c\widehat{f}$.
Becker [@Becker88 Lemma 3.4] showed that for every nonzero ordinal $\alpha<\Theta$, there are reasonable pointclasses $\Sigma$ and $\Pi$ such that $\mathbf{\Sigma}=\Sigma_\alpha$ and $\mathbf{\Pi}=\Pi_\alpha$. Consequently, if ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ is nonselfdual, then there is a UOP jump operator $g$ such that $f\equiv_{sW}^{\widehat{c}}g$.
### Selfdual functions
It remains to consider the case that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ is selfdual, and $f$ is discontinuous. By discontinuity of $f$, we have ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}\not\in\Delta_1^{{\diamondsuit}}$. Generally, the following lemma states that we do not need to deal with a selfdual Wadge degree of successor rank.
Assume $\alpha>0$. If ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}\in\Delta^{{\diamondsuit}}_{\alpha+1}$ and if ${\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}$ is $\Sigma^{{\diamondsuit}}_\alpha$-complete, then $f\leq_{sW}^c\widehat{g}$.
Given $g\colon {\omega}^{\omega}\to\mathbb{R}$, define $-g$ by $(-g)(X)=-g(X)$. Note that ${\mathrm{Lev}_{-g}}$ is $\Pi^{{\diamondsuit}}_\alpha$-complete whenever ${\mathrm{Lev}_{g}}$ is $\Sigma^{{\diamondsuit}}_\alpha$-complete. Define $h$ by $h(0X)=g(X)$ and $h(1X)=-g(X)$. Then, ${\mathrm{Lev}_{h}}$ is $\Delta^{{\diamondsuit}}_{\alpha+1}$-complete, and therefore, if ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}\in\Delta^{{\diamondsuit}}_{\alpha+1}$, then ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}\leq_wS_h$. Thus, by Lemma \[lem:wadge-implies-pcsW\], we have $f\leq_{sW}^c\widehat{h}$. Therefore, it suffices to show that $h\leq_{sW}^c\widehat{g}$. Since $\alpha>0$, $g$ cannot be constant, that is, there are $Z_0,Z_1$ such that $g(Z_0)\not=g(Z_1)$. Let $U_0,U_1$ be disjoint open sets such that $g(Z_i)\subseteq U_i$ for each $i<2$. Define $\Psi(0iX)=Z_i$, and $\Psi(1iX)=X$. Then define $\Phi(z\oplus y)=y$ if $z\in U_0$, and $\Phi(z\oplus y)=-y$ if we find that $z\in U_1$. Then, we get $$h(iX)=\Phi(g(\Psi(0iX))\oplus g(\Psi(1iX))).$$ Consequently, $h\leq_{sW}^c\widehat{g}$ as desired.
If $\alpha$ is a limit ordinal of countable cofinality, there is a sequence $\beta_n<\alpha$ such that $\alpha=\sup_n\beta_n$. Let $J_{\beta_n}$ be a UOP function corresponding to the reasonable pointclass $\Sigma_{\beta_n}$. Then, as in Becker [@Becker88], define $J_\alpha$ as follows: $$J_\alpha(X)=\bigoplus_{n\in{\omega}} J_{\beta_n}(X).$$
Becker [@Becker88] showed that $J_\alpha$ is a UOP function on a u.p.p. tree, that is, there is a u.p.p tree $T$ such that $J_\alpha^\ast:=J_\alpha\circ T$ is UOP.
For any limit ordinal $\alpha$ of countable cofinality, if ${\mathrm{Lev}_{f}}$ is $\Delta_\alpha^{{\diamondsuit}}$-complete, then $f\equiv_{sW}^{\widehat{c}}J_\alpha^\ast$.
Straightforward.
This concludes the proof of Theorem \[thm:pcsW-equal-Martin\]. We finally show Theorem \[thm:pcsW-equal-Martin2\] saying that the jump of the parallelization always gives the successor rank.
As mentioned before, the $\leq^{\triangledown}_\mathbf{T}$-degrees of UOP functions form a well-order of height $\Theta$, and therefore, by Theorem \[thm:pcsW-equal-Martin\], so are the p.c.s. Weihrauch degrees.
We claim that for non-constant functions $f,g\colon 2^{\omega}\to 2^{\omega}$, if $f\leq{^{\widehat{c}}_{sW}}g$ then $f'\leq_{sW}^c \widehat{g}'$. First note that the Turing jump $X\mapsto X'$ is UOP, so let $u$ be a witness of UOP-ness of the Turing jump, that is, if $X\leq_TY$ via $e$ then $X'\leq_TY'$ via $u(e)$. If $f\leq{^{\widehat{c}}_{sW}}g$ then there are continuous functions $h$ and $k$ such that $f=k\circ\widehat{g}\circ h$. Put $B_X=\widehat{g}(h(X))$ for any $X\in 2^{\omega}$. As $k$ is continuous, there is an oracle $C$ such that $k$ is $C$-computable. Hence, $f(X)\leq_T B_X\oplus C$ via some index $e$ independent of $X$. As in the proof of Lemma \[lem:remove-strong\], since $g$ is not constant, one can find $\langle Z_n^C:n\in{\omega}\rangle$ such that $\widehat{g}(\langle Z_n^C:n\in{\omega}\rangle)$ computes $C$. Assume that $h(X)=\langle h_n(X):n\in{\omega}\rangle$. Then define $r_{2n}(X)=h_n(X)$, $r_{2n+1}(X)=Z_n^C$, and $r(X)=\langle r_n(X):n\in{\omega}\rangle$. Since $B_X\oplus C\leq_T\widehat{g}(r(X))$ via some index $d$ (independent of $X$), $(B_X\oplus C)'\leq_T\widehat{g}(r(X))'$ via $u(d)$. Moreover, since $f(X)\leq_TB_X\oplus C$ via $e$, we have $f(X)'\leq_T(B_X\oplus C)'$ via $u(e)$. Hence, there is an index $c$ independent of $X$ such that $f(X)'\leq_T\widehat{g}(r(X))'$ via $c$. In other words, the pair $(r,\Phi_c)$ witnesses $f'\leq_{sW}^c\widehat{g}'$.
Let $f$ be a non-constant function of p.c.s. Weihrauch rank $\alpha$. By Theorem \[thm:pcsW-equal-Martin\], there is a UOP function $g$ such that $f\equiv{^{\widehat{c}}_{sW}}g$, and the $\leq^{\triangledown}_\mathbf{T}$-rank of $g$ is also $\alpha$. It is easy to see that $\widehat{g}$ and $\widehat{g}'$ are also UOP, and clearly $\widehat{g}\equiv{^{\widehat{c}}_{sW}}g$. Hence, by Theorem \[thm:pcsW-equal-Martin\], the $\leq^{\triangledown}_\mathbf{T}$-rank of $\widehat{g}$ is still $\alpha$. Then, by Steel’s theorem [@Steel82], the $\leq^{\triangledown}_\mathbf{T}$-rank of $\widehat{g}'$ is $\alpha+1$, and again by Theorem \[thm:pcsW-equal-Martin\], so is the p.c.s. Weihrauch rank. By the above claim, we have $\widehat{f}'\equiv{^{\widehat{c}}_{sW}}\widehat{g}'$. Consequently, the p.c.s. Weihrauch rank of $\widehat{f}'$ is $\alpha+1$
The claim in the above proof also shows that if $f$ is non-constant and parallelizable, so is $f'$: By parallelizability of $f$, we have $\widehat{f}\leq_{sW}^c f$, and by the above claim, we also have $\widehat{f}'\leq_{sW}^c f'$. For $A_n=f(X_n)$, as the Turing jump is UOP, $\bigoplus_{n\in{\omega}}A_n'$ is computable in $(\bigoplus_{n\in{\omega}}A_n)'$ in a uniform manner; hence $\widehat{(f')}\leq_{sW}^c \widehat{f}'$. Therefore, $f'$ is parallelizable.
As a consequence, if $f$ is non-constant and parallelizable, then one can obtain an ${\omega}_1$-sequence of p.c.s. Weihrauch successor ranks of $f$ only by iterating the jump $g\mapsto g'$.
Acknowledgements {#acknowledgements .unnumbered}
----------------
The author was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI, Grant-in-Aid for Research Activity Start-up, Grant Number 17H06738. The author also thanks JSPS Core-to-Core Program (A. Advanced Research Networks) for supporting the research. The author would like to thank Adam Day, Rod Downey, Antonio Montalbán, and Linda Brown Westrick for valuable discussions.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: |
Let $F_1, \ldots, F_r$ be integer forms of degree $d \ge 2$ in $s$ variables. Relaxing the non-singularity condition in a well known result by Birch, we establish the expected Hardy-Littlewood asymptotic formula for the density of integer points on the intersection $F_1 = \ldots =
F_r = 0$, providing that $$s>\max_{\mathbf{a} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^r \backslash \{\mathbf{0}\}}
\dim V_\mathbf{a}^* + r(r+1) (d-1) 2^{d-1},$$ where $V_\mathbf{a}^* = \{\mathbf{x} \in {\mathbb{C}}^s:
\nabla(a_1 F_1(\mathbf{x}) + \ldots + a_r F_r(\mathbf{x})) =
\mathbf{0}\}$. In the same context, we also improve on previous work by Schmidt and show that the expected Hardy-Littlewood asymptotic formula holds true, providing that each form in the rational pencil of $F_1, \ldots, F_r$ has
- rank exceeding $2r^2+2r \; (d=2)$,
- $h$-invariant exceeding $8r^2+8r \; (d=3)$,
- $h$-invariant exceeding $\varphi(d) (d-1) 2^{d-1} r(r+1)$ for a certain function $\varphi(d)$ when $d \ge 4$.
In particular, if $F_1, \ldots, F_r$ are rational quadratic forms, each form in their complex pencil has rank exceeding $2r^2+2r$, and the intersection $F_1=\ldots=F_r=0$ has a non-singular real zero, then this intersection also has a non-trivial rational zero. For $r=1$, this recovers a classical result by Meyer.\
Our new tool, which is of interest in itself, is a variant of Weyl’s inequality for general systems of forms which is useful in situations like those above where one knows a certain lower rank (or dimension of singular locus) bound for all forms in the rational pencil of the given ones.
address: |
Department of Mathematics, Royal Holloway, University of London\
TW20 0EX Egham, United Kingdom
author:
- Rainer Dietmann
title: 'Weyl’s inequality and systems of forms'
---
[^1]
Introduction {#mallorca}
============
Let $F_1, \ldots, F_r \in {\mathbb{Z}}[X_1, \ldots, X_s]$ be forms of degree $d$, and let $V^*$ be the union of the loci of singularities of the varieties $$F_1(\mathbf{x}) = \mu_1, \ldots, F_r(\mathbf{x}) = \mu_r;$$ in the following all dimensions are meant to be affine. Then Birch ([@B]) has shown that if $$\label{virginia_water}
s > \dim V^* + r(r+1)(d-1)2^{d-1},$$ then the expected Hardy-Littlewood asymptotic formula $$\mathfrak{J} \mathfrak{S} P^{s-rd} + O(P^{s-rd-\delta})$$ for the number of integer solutions $\mathbf{x} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^s$ of the system $$F_1(\mathbf{x}) = \ldots = F_r(\mathbf{x}) = 0$$ holds true, where the $\mathbf{x}$ are constrained to an expanding box of size $P$, and $\mathfrak{J}$ and $\mathfrak{S}$ are the singular integral and the singular series, respectively. Alternatively, $V^*$ can also be described as the variety of all points $\mathbf{x} \in {\mathbb{C}}^s$ for which the rank of the Jacobi matrix $$\left( \frac{\partial F_i(\mathbf{x})}{\partial x_j}
\right)_{\substack{1 \le i \le r\\1 \le j \le s}}$$ is less than $r$ (see also [@AM]). For $r=1$, $\dim V^*$ is just the dimension of the singular locus of the variety $$V=\{\mathbf{x} \in {\mathbb{C}}^s:
F_i(\mathbf{x})=0 \;\;\; (1 \le i \le r)\},$$ but for $r>1$ the quantity $\dim V^*$ can exceed the dimension of the singular locus of $V$: For example, suppose that $V$ is non-singular. Then it is still possible to find $a_1, \ldots, a_r \in {\mathbb{C}}$, not all zero, for which the discriminant $\operatorname{disc}(a_1 F_1 + \ldots + a_r F_r)$ is zero. This implies that there is an $\mathbf{x} \in {\mathbb{C}}^n \backslash
\{\mathbf{0}\}$ for which $$\nabla(a_1 F_1(\mathbf{x}) + \ldots + a_r F_r(\mathbf{x})) =
a_1 \nabla F_1(\mathbf{x}) + \ldots + a_r \nabla F_r(\mathbf{x}) =
\mathbf{0},$$ whence $\mathbf{x} \in V^*$ and $\dim V^* \ge 1$. As another example, consider a system of $r$ diagonal forms $F_1, \ldots, F_r$ of degree $d$ with non-singular coefficient matrix. Then $V$ is non-singular, but by applying row operations we can find a form in the pencil of $F_1, \ldots, F_r$ with $r-1$ coefficients being zero, which shows that $\dim V^* \ge r-1$.\
Our first aim in this paper is to show that Birch’s condition can be relaxed to the effect that $\dim V^*$ can be replaced by $$\max_{\mathbf{a} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^r \backslash \{\mathbf{0}\}}
\dim V_\mathbf{a}^*,$$ where $$V_\mathbf{a}^* = \{\mathbf{x} \in {\mathbb{C}}^s:
\nabla(a_1 F_1(\mathbf{x}) + \ldots + a_r F_r(\mathbf{x})) =
\mathbf{0}\}.$$ In particular, for $\mathbf{a} \ne \mathbf{0}$ we have $V_\mathbf{a}^* \subset V^*$, so $$\max_{\mathbf{a} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^r \backslash \{\mathbf{0}\}}
\dim V_\mathbf{a}^* \le \dim V^*,$$ and for $r=1$ the two quantities are the same. However, for $r>1$ strict inequality $$\max_{\mathbf{a} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^r \backslash \{\mathbf{0}\}}
\dim V_\mathbf{a}^* < \dim V^*$$ is possible, as the left hand side only involves the rational pencil of $F_1, \ldots, F_r$, whereas the right hand side implicitly also includes the complex one. For instance, suppose that $F_1, \ldots, F_r$ have the property that the equation $$\label{ente}
\operatorname{disc}(a_1 F_1 + \ldots + a_r F_r) = 0$$ has no solution $\mathbf{a} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^r \backslash \{\mathbf{0}\}$; one example for $r=d=2, s=13$ which can be easily checked by a computer algebra package would be given by the pair of quadratic forms $$\begin{aligned}
F_1(X_1, \ldots, X_{13}) & = X_1^2 + \ldots + X_9^2
+ X_{10}^2 + 2 X_{11}^2 + X_{12}^2 + 2 X_{13}^2,\\
F_2(X_1, \ldots, X_{13}) & =
2 \sum_{j=0}^2 \left( X_{3j+1} X_{3j+2} + 3 X_{3j+1} X_{3j+3} +
2 X_{3j+2} X_{3j+3} \right)\\
& + 2 X_{10} X_{11} + 2 X_{12} X_{13}.\end{aligned}$$ Then having no solution $\mathbf{a} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^r
\backslash \{\mathbf{0}\}$ implies that $$\max_{\mathbf{a} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^r \backslash \{\mathbf{0}\}}
\dim V_\mathbf{a}^* = 0,$$ whereas as shown above $\dim V^* \ge 1$ for $r>1$, even if the variety $V$ is non-singular. Summarising these observations, we therefore find that the following result is always of the same quality as Birch’s one given by regarding the number of required variables, and for $r>1$ can even be stronger as illustrated by the example above.
\[stammtisch\] Let $F_1, \ldots, F_r \in {\mathbb{Z}}[X_1, \ldots, X_s]$ be forms of degree $d \ge 2$, and suppose that $$s>\max_{\mathbf{a} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^r \backslash \{\mathbf{0}\}}
\dim V_\mathbf{a}^* + r(r+1) (d-1) 2^{d-1}.$$ Then if ${\mathcal{B}}$ is a box in ${\mathbb{R}}^s$ with sides parallel to the coordinate axes, and contained in the unit box, then there exists a positive $\delta$ such that for the quantity $$\varrho(P) := \#\{\mathbf{x} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^s:\mathbf{x} \in P{\mathcal{B}}\mbox{ and }
F_i(\mathbf{x}) = 0 \; (1 \le i \le r)\}$$ the asymptotic formula $$\label{unknown}
\varrho(P) = \mathfrak{J} \mathfrak{S} P^{s-rd} + O(P^{s-rd-\delta})$$ holds true, where $\mathfrak{J}$ and $\mathfrak{S}$ are the singular integral and the singular series, respectively.
For instance, as shown by the example above, Theorem \[stammtisch\] handles ‘generic’ pairs of quadratic forms in $13$ variables; see also [@Munshi] for recent work by Munshi which gives a stronger result in this special case $r=d=2$.\
Usually, $V^*$ as well as the $V_\mathbf{a}^*$ are difficult to understand, and one would prefer a condition which is arithmetically easier to handle. This point of view was taken up by Schmidt ([@S1], [@S2]) for the case of quadratic and cubic forms, and in [@Schmidt] for forms of any degree. For a system of $r$ rational quadratic forms, he could show that an asymptotic formula for the number of integer zeros in an expanding region holds true, provided that every form in the rational pencil has rank exceeding $2r^2+3r$. Birch’s condition (\[virginia\_water\]) for $d=2$ reads $s>\dim V^*+2r^2+2r$, so one might wonder if Schmidt’s rank bound $2r^2+3r$ can be relaxed to $2r^2+2r$. This is indeed the case, as illustrated by our first result.
\[see\] Let $F_1, \ldots, F_r \in {\mathbb{Z}}[X_1, \ldots, X_s]$ be quadratic forms, such that each form in their rational pencil has rank exceeding $2r^2+2r$. Then if ${\mathcal{B}}$ is a box in ${\mathbb{R}}^s$ with sides parallel to the coordinate axes, and contained in the unit box, then there exists a positive $\delta$ such that for the quantity $$\varrho(P) := \#\{\mathbf{x} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^s:\mathbf{x} \in P{\mathcal{B}}\mbox{ and }
F_i(\mathbf{x}) = 0 \; (1 \le i \le r)\}$$ the asymptotic formula $$\label{unknown}
\varrho(P) = \mathfrak{J} \mathfrak{S} P^{s-2r} + O(P^{s-2r-\delta})$$ holds true, where $\mathfrak{J}$ and $\mathfrak{S}$ are the singular integral and the singular series, respectively.
In particular, under the rank condition of Theorem \[see\], a system $F_1(\mathbf{x}) = \ldots = F_r(\mathbf{x}) = 0$ of rational quadratic forms satisfies the Local-Global principle. If one imposes further conditions, one can show that $\mathfrak{J}$ and $\mathfrak{S}$ are positive and concludes that there are non-trivial rational zeros. The following result is along these lines, improving a $2r^2+3r$ which has previously been known (see Theorem 1 in [@D]) to $2r^2+2r$.
\[akw\] Let $F_1, \ldots, F_r$ be rational quadratic forms. Suppose that each form in the complex pencil of $F_1, \ldots, F_r$ has rank exceeding $2r^2+2r$, and suppose that the system $F_1=\ldots=F_r=0$ has a non-singular real zero. Then the asymptotic formula (\[unknown\]) holds true, and the singular integral $\mathfrak{J}$ and the singular series $\mathfrak{S}$ are positive. In particular, the intersection $F_1=\ldots=F_r=0$ has a non-trivial rational zero.
Since each form in the complex pencil of $F_1, \ldots, F_r$ has rank exceeding $2r^2+2r$, also each form in the rational pencil of $F_1, \ldots,
F_r$ has rank exceeding $2r^2+2r$. Hence, by Theorem \[see\], the asymptotic formula (\[unknown\]) holds true. Moreover, for the same reason (see [@D] or [@S1] for details), each form in any ${\mathbb{Q}}_p$-rational pencil of $F_1, \ldots, F_r$ has rank exceeding $2r^2+2r$ as well. As shown in [@D], p. 510, this implies that $\mathfrak{S}>0$. Finally, the assumption on non-singular real solubility of $F_1=\ldots
=F_r=0$ implies that $\mathfrak{J}>0$.
Since a singular rational quadratic form trivially has a non-trivial rational zero, Corollary \[akw\] for $r=1$ recovers a classical result by Meyer [@M]: Any indefinite rational quadratic form in at least five variables has a non-trivial rational zero. Much more than Corollary \[akw\] is known for $r=2$ (see [@C], [@HB]), but for $r>2$ our result seems to be the strongest available at present.\
To state our result for systems of cubic forms, we first have to introduce the following terminology: If $C(X_1, \ldots, X_s) \in {\mathbb{Q}}[X_1, \ldots, X_s]$ is a rational cubic form, then its $h$-*invariant* $h(C)$ is the smallest non-negative integer $h$ such that $C$ can be written in the form $$C(X_1, \ldots, X_s) = \sum_{i=1}^h L_i(X_1, \ldots, X_s)
Q_i(X_1, \ldots, X_s)$$ for suitable linear forms $L_i \in {\mathbb{Q}}[X_1, \ldots, X_s]$ and quadratic forms $Q_i \in {\mathbb{Q}}[X_1, \ldots, X_s]$. One can think of the $h$-invariant as some way of generalising rank from quadratic to cubic forms. For a system of $r$ rational cubic forms, Schmidt ([@S2], Theorem 2) has shown that an asymptotic formula for the number of integer zeros in an expanding region holds true, provided that each form in the rational pencil of $C_1, \ldots, C_r$ has $h$-invariant exceeding $10r^2+6r$. Again, Birch’s condition (\[virginia\_water\]) for $d=3$ suggests that a weaker bound, namely $8r^2+8r$ could suffice, which indeed is true.
\[rumpsteak\] Let $F_1, \ldots, F_r \in {\mathbb{Z}}[X_1, \ldots, X_s]$ be cubic forms, such that each form in their rational pencil has $h$-invariant exceeding $8r^2+8r$. Then if ${\mathcal{B}}$ is a box in ${\mathbb{R}}^s$ with sides parallel to the coordinate axes, and contained in the unit box, then there exists a positive $\delta$ such that for the quantity $$\varrho(P) := \#\{\mathbf{x} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^s:\mathbf{x} \in P{\mathcal{B}}\mbox{ and }
F_i(\mathbf{x}) = 0 \; (1 \le i \le r)\}$$ the asymptotic formula $$\varrho(P) = \mathfrak{J} \mathfrak{S} P^{s-3r} + O(P^{s-3r-\delta})$$ holds true, where $\mathfrak{J}$ and $\mathfrak{S}$ are the singular integral and the singular series, respectively.
Not surprisingly, the proofs of Theorem \[stammtisch\], Theorem \[see\] and Theorem \[rumpsteak\] make use of the Hardy-Littlewood circle method. Our main innovation is a variant of Birch’s form of Weyl’s inequality for general systems of forms which turns out to be more useful in the specific situations encountered here, where one knows a certain lower rank (or dimension of singular locus) bound for all forms in the rational pencil of the given ones.\
One might ask if our method also provides an analogue of Theorem \[see\] and Theorem \[rumpsteak\] for systems of rational forms of degree $d \ge 4$. This is indeed the case, and the treatment is analogous to that for $d=3$, so we only give a brief sketch: The concept of an $h$-invariant generalises from cubic forms to higher degree forms, see Schmidt’s seminal work [@Schmidt], p. 245. Using one of the key results in [@Schmidt], one can show that if $F_1, \ldots, F_r \in {\mathbb{Z}}[X_1, \ldots, X_s]$ are forms of degree $d$, and each form in their rational pencil has $h$-invariant exceeding $$\label{oktober}
\varphi(d) (d-1) 2^{d-1} r(r+1),$$ where $\varphi(2)=\varphi(3)=1$, $\varphi(4)=3$, $\varphi(5)=13$, and $\varphi(d)<(\log 2)^{-d} d!$ in general, then an asymptotic formula for the number of integer zeros of the system $F_1=\ldots=F_r=0$ in an expanding box of size $P$ of the form $$\mathfrak{J} \mathfrak{S} P^{s-rd} + O(P^{s-rd-\delta})$$ holds true, parallelising Theorems \[see\] and \[rumpsteak\] (note that also Theorem II in [@Schmidt] deals with generic systems of forms of not necessarily the same degrees and could be specialised to the setting here, but is not optimised to our situation of all forms having the same degree $d$). However, for $d \ge 4$ the bound no longer parallels the corresponding term $r(r+1)(d-1)2^{d-1}$ in Birch’s result as $\varphi(d)>1$ for $d \ge 4$.\
\
**Acknowledgment:** The author would like to thank the referees for carefully reading this paper.\
Since this paper was submitted for publication, Schindler [@Schindler] has posted a preprint which independently proves Theorem \[stammtisch\] and the result described around equation above which is proved in section \[thursday\].
Weyl’s inequality {#chile}
=================
Let $F_1, \ldots, F_r \in {\mathbb{Z}}[X_1, \ldots, X_s]$ be forms of degree $d \ge 2$. We can write $F_i$ in the form $$F_i(\mathbf{x}) = \sum_{1 \le j_1, \ldots, j_d \le s}
c_{j_1, \ldots, j_d}^{(i)} x_{j_1} \cdots x_{j_d} \;\;\; (1 \le i \le r),$$ and for the purpose of studying the system $F_1 = \ldots = F_r = 0$ we may without loss of generality assume that the coefficients $c_{j_1, \ldots, j_d}^{(i)}$ are symmetric in $j_1, \ldots, j_d$. Let ${\mathcal{B}}$ be an $s$-dimensional box with sides parallel to the coordinate axes, and for ${\mbox{\boldmath{$\alpha$}}}\in {\mathbb{R}}^r$ let $S(\mathbf{{\mbox{\boldmath{$\alpha$}}}})$ be the exponential sum $$S({\mbox{\boldmath{$\alpha$}}}) = \sum_{\mathbf{x} \in P{\mathcal{B}}} e(\alpha_1 F_1(\mathbf{x}) +
\ldots + \alpha_r F_r(\mathbf{x})).$$ Moreover, for ${\mbox{\boldmath{$\alpha$}}}\in {\mathbb{R}}^r$, $\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \ldots,
\mathbf{x}^{(d-1)} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^s$ and $j \in \{1, \ldots, s\}$ let $$\label{bookie}
\Phi_j(\mathbf{{\mbox{\boldmath{$\alpha$}}}}; \mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \ldots, \mathbf{x}^{(d-1)}) =
\sum_{i=1}^r \alpha_i \Psi_j^{(i)}(\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \ldots,
\mathbf{x}^{(d-1)})$$ where $$\Psi_j^{(i)}(\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \ldots, \mathbf{x}^{(d-1)}) =
d! \sum_{1 \le j_1, \ldots, j_{d-1} \le s}
c^{(i)}_{j, j_1, \ldots, j_{d-1}} x_{j_1}^{(1)} \cdots x_{j_{d-1}}^{(d-1)}.$$ Finally, let $$\begin{aligned}
\label{gerrard}
N(P;Q;{\mbox{\boldmath{$\alpha$}}}) & = & \#\{\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \ldots, \mathbf{x}^{(d-1)}
\in {\mathbb{Z}}^s: \mathbf{x}^{(i)} \in P{\mathcal{B}}\; (1 \le i \le d-1) \\
& & \mbox{and } ||\Phi_j({\mbox{\boldmath{$\alpha$}}}; \mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \ldots,
\mathbf{x}^{(d-1)})|| < Q \; (1 \le j \le s)\}, \nonumber\end{aligned}$$ where $||\cdot||$ as usual denotes distance to the nearest integer. In the following, all implied $O$-constants depend at most on $s, r, d, F_1, \ldots, F_r, {\mathcal{B}}$ and a chosen small positive $\varepsilon$.
\[england\] Let $0 < \theta \le 1$, $\varepsilon>0$ and $k>0$. Then if $$S(\mathbf{{\mbox{\boldmath{$\alpha$}}}}) > P^{s-k},$$ then $$\label{rooney}
N(P^{\theta};P^{-d+(d-1)\theta};{\mbox{\boldmath{$\alpha$}}}) \gg P^{(d-1)s\theta-2^{d-1}k-
\varepsilon}.$$
This is Lemma 2.4 in [@B].
Our next lemma can be thought of as a variant of Lemma 2.5 in [@B], where alternative (iii) has been replaced by one more suitable for dealing with systems of forms satisfying a certain pencil condition.
\[booker\] In the notation of Lemma \[england\], we either (i) have $$S(\mathbf{{\mbox{\boldmath{$\alpha$}}}}) \ll P^{s-k},$$ or (ii) there are integers $a_1, \ldots, a_r, q$ such that $$\begin{aligned}
(a_1, \ldots, a_r, q)=1, & & \\
|q\alpha_i-a_i| \ll P^{-d+r(d-1)\theta} \;\;\; (1 \le i \le r), & & \\
1 \le q \ll P^{r(d-1)\theta}, & & \\\end{aligned}$$ or (iii) there are integers $a_1, \ldots, a_r$, not all zero, such that $$M(a_1, \ldots, a_r; P^\theta)
\gg (P^\theta)^{(d-1)s-2^{d-1}k/\theta-\varepsilon}$$ where $$\begin{aligned}
\label{odds}
M(a_1, \ldots, a_r; H) & = & \#\{\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \ldots,
\mathbf{x}^{(d-1)} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^s: \mathbf{x}^{(i)} \in H{\mathcal{B}}\; (1 \le i
\le d-1) \\
& & \mbox{and } \Phi_j(\mathbf{a}; \mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \ldots,
\mathbf{x}^{(d-1)}) = 0 \; (1 \le j \le s)\}. \nonumber\end{aligned}$$
Our proof is similar to that of Lemma 2.5 in [@B] (see also the remark at the bottom of page 248 in [@B]). Suppose that alternative (i) is false. Then by Lemma \[england\], the lower bound (\[rooney\]) holds true. Let $\Psi$ be the matrix whose elements are the numbers $\Psi_j^{(i)}(\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \ldots,
\mathbf{x}^{(d-1)})$, where the column $i$ ranges from $1$ to $r$, and the rows range over the Cartesian product of all possible choices for $j \in \{1, \ldots, s\}$ times all possible choices for tuples $\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \ldots, \mathbf{x}^{(d-1)}$ counted by $N$ in (\[rooney\]).\
\
**Case I:** rank $\Psi=r$.\
\
Then $\Psi$ has a non-singular $r \times r$ submatrix $R$. Each row of $R$ is of the form $$\left( \Psi_j^{(1)}(\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \ldots, \mathbf{x}^{(d-1)}),
\ldots, \Psi_j^{(r)}(\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \ldots, \mathbf{x}^{(d-1)}) \right)$$ for suitable $j \in \{1, \ldots, s\}$ and $\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \ldots,
\mathbf{x}^{(d-1)} \in P^\theta {\mathcal{B}}$ counted by $N$ in (\[rooney\]). In particular, all matrix elements $r_{\ell i}$ are integers and $$\label{klose}
|r_{\ell i}| \ll P^{\theta (d-1)}$$ for all $i \in \{1, \ldots, r\}$ and for all $\ell$. By (\[rooney\]) and the definition (\[gerrard\]) of $N$, we have $$\label{podolski}
R \left( \begin{array}{c} \alpha_1 \\ \vdots \\ \alpha_r \end{array} \right)
= \left( \begin{array}{c} b_1+c_1 \\ \vdots \\ b_r+c_r \end{array}
\right),$$ where the $b_i$ are integers and $c_i \in {\mathbb{R}}$ such that $$\label{uruguay}
|c_i| \ll P^{-d+(d-1)\theta} \;\;\; (1 \le i \le r).$$ Now let $q = \det R$. Then $q \ne 0$ and $$|q| \ll P^{r(d-1)\theta}$$ by (\[klose\]). Let $\mathbf{a} \in {\mathbb{R}}^r$ be the solution of $$\label{mueller}
R \left( \begin{array}{c} a_1 \\ \vdots \\ a_r \end{array} \right)
= q \left( \begin{array}{c} b_1 \\ \vdots \\ b_r \end{array} \right).$$ By Cramer’s rule, $\mathbf{a} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^r$. Now (\[podolski\]) and (\[mueller\]) yield $$\label{neuner}
q \left( \begin{array}{c} \alpha_1 \\ \vdots \\ \alpha_r \end{array}
\right) - \left( \begin{array}{c} a_1 \\ \vdots \\ a_r \end{array}
\right) =
q R^{-1} \left( \begin{array}{c} c_1 \\ \vdots \\ c_r \end{array} \right).$$ Moreover, by (\[klose\]) and Cramer’s rule all elements in the matrix $qR^{-1}$ are at most $O(P^{\theta(r-1)(d-1)})$. Hence (\[uruguay\]) and (\[neuner\]) give $$|q\alpha_i-a_i| \ll P^{-d+r(d-1)\theta} \;\;\; (1 \le i \le r).$$ Clearly, by multiplying with $-1$ if necessary we can ensure that $q \in {\mathbb{N}}$, and by dividing through $(a_1, \ldots, a_r, q)$ we can achieve $(a_1, \ldots, a_r, q)=1$ without affecting the quality of the Diophantine approximations to $\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_r$. Hence (ii) is true.\
\
**Case II:** rank $\Psi<r$.\
\
In this case, the columns of $\Psi$ must be linearly dependent. Therefore, there exists $\mathbf{a} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^r \backslash\{\mathbf{0}\}$ such that $$\sum_{i=1}^r a_i
\Psi_j^{(i)}(\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \ldots, \mathbf{x}^{(d-1)})=0$$ for all $j \in \{1, \ldots, s\}$ and for all $\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \ldots,
\mathbf{x}^{(d-1)} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^s$ that are counted by $N$ in (\[rooney\]). By (\[bookie\]), (\[rooney\]) and (\[odds\]) we immediately get the conclusion in alternative (iii).
Birch’s Theorem revisited
=========================
The following result is along the lines of §3 in [@B] and shows that alternative (iii) in Lemma \[booker\] can be excluded if the variety under consideration is sufficiently non-singular.
\[neujahr\] Keeping the notation of sections \[mallorca\] and \[chile\], let $\mathbf{a} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^r \backslash\{\mathbf{0}\}$. Then $$M(a_1, \ldots, a_r; H) \ll H^{(d-1)s-
\operatorname{codim}V_{\mathbf{a}}^*},$$ where the implied $O$-constant does not depend on $\mathbf{a}$.
Following the proof of Lemma 3.2 in [@B], we have to consider the variety $$W = \{\mathbf{x}=(\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \ldots, \mathbf{x}^{(d-1)})
\in {\mathbb{C}}^{(d-1)s}:
\Phi_j(\mathbf{a}; \mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \ldots, \mathbf{x}^{(d-1)})=0
\;\;\; (1 \le j \le s)\}.$$ Then $$M(a_1, \ldots, a_r; H) \ll H^{\dim W},$$ where the implied $O$-constant depends at most on $s$, $r$ and $d$. Now let $U$ be the diagonal $$U = \{\mathbf{x}=(\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \ldots, \mathbf{x}^{(d-1)})
\in {\mathbb{C}}^{(d-1)s}:
\mathbf{x}^{(1)} = \ldots = \mathbf{x}^{(d-1)}\}.$$ Then $$\dim (W \cap U) \ge \dim W + \dim U - (d-1)s
= \dim W - (d-2)s,$$ and for each $(\mathbf{x}, \ldots, \mathbf{x}) \in W \cap U$ we have $\nabla (a_1 F_1(\mathbf{x}) + \ldots + a_r F_r(\mathbf{x})) =
\mathbf{0}$, so $\dim (W \cap U) \le \dim V_\mathbf{a}^*$ and $$\dim W \le (d-2)s + \dim V_\mathbf{a}^*
= (d-1)s - \operatorname{codim} V_\mathbf{a}^*,$$ which finishes the proof.
Our next result is an analogue of the central Lemma 4.3 in [@B].
\[liederhalle\] Keeping the notation of sections \[mallorca\] and \[chile\], define $K$ by $$\max_{\mathbf{a} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^r \backslash \{\mathbf{0}\}}
\dim V_\mathbf{a}^* = s-2^{d-1}K.$$ Then we either (i) have $$S({\mbox{\boldmath{$\alpha$}}}) \ll P^{s-K\theta+\varepsilon},$$ or alternative (ii) of Lemma \[booker\] holds true.
Suppose that alternative (iii) of Lemma \[booker\] is true. Then there exists $\mathbf{a} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^r \backslash\{\mathbf{0}\}$ such that $$\label{beethoven}
M(a_1, \ldots, a_r; P^\theta)
\gg (P^\theta)^{(d-1)s-2^{d-1}k/\theta-\varepsilon}.$$ On the other hand, by Lemma \[neujahr\], we know that $$\label{schubert}
M(a_1, \ldots, a_r; P^\theta) \ll
(P^\theta)^{(d-1)s-\operatorname{codim} V_\mathbf{a}^*}
\le (P^\theta)^{(d-1)s-2^{d-1}K}.$$ The conditions (\[beethoven\]) and (\[schubert\]) are only compatible if $K \le \frac{k}{\theta} + \varepsilon \cdot 2^{1-d}$, so for $k=K\theta-\varepsilon$ alternative (iii) of Lemma \[booker\] is impossible, which proves the result.
Using Lemma \[liederhalle\] instead of Lemma 4.3 in [@B] and then following the rest of the arguments in [@B] establishes Theorem \[stammtisch\].
Systems of quadratic forms
==========================
For quadratic forms, it is easy to give an interpretation of alternative (iii) in Lemma \[booker\]. To this end we need the following elementary observation.
\[longport\] Let $L_1, \ldots, L_s \in {\mathbb{Z}}[X_1, \ldots, X_s]$ be linear forms, such that their span in the space of linear forms has rank at least $m$. Then, uniformly in $L_1, \ldots, L_s$, we have $$\#\{\mathbf{x} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^s:\mathbf{x} \in P{\mathcal{B}}\mbox{ and }
L_j(\mathbf{x})=0 \; (1 \le j \le s)\} \ll P^{s-m}.$$
This is trivial.
We can now reformulate Lemma \[booker\] for systems of quadratic forms.
\[greenwhich\] Let $d=2$. Suppose that each quadratic form in the rational pencil of $F_1, \ldots, F_r$ has rank at least $m$. Then, using the notation of Lemma \[england\], we either (i) have $$S(\mathbf{{\mbox{\boldmath{$\alpha$}}}}) \ll P^{s-m\theta/2+\varepsilon},$$ or alternative (ii) (where $d=2$) of Lemma \[booker\] holds true.
Suppose that neither alternative (i) nor alternative (ii) of Lemma \[booker\] are true. Then alternative (iii) must be true. Hence there exists $\mathbf{a} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^r \backslash \{\mathbf{0}\}$ such that $M(a_1, \ldots, a_r; P^{\theta}) \gg (P^{\theta})^{s-2k/\theta-\varepsilon}$. This means that $$\label{jekyll}
\#\{\mathbf{x} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^s:\mathbf{x} \in P^{\theta}{\mathcal{B}}\mbox{ and }
\Phi_j(\mathbf{a}; \mathbf{x}) = 0 \; (1 \le j \le s)\}
\gg (P^{\theta})^{s-2k/\theta-\varepsilon}.$$ Now consider the quadratic form $$F = \sum_{i=1}^r a_i F_i.$$ This form is in the rational pencil of $F_1, \ldots, F_r$, hence rank $F \ge m$. Clearly $$\begin{aligned}
F(\mathbf{x}) & = & \sum_{i=1}^r a_i F_i(\mathbf{x})
= \frac{1}{2} \sum_{i=1}^r a_i \sum_{j=1}^s x_j \Psi_j^{(i)}(\mathbf{x})
\\ & = & \frac{1}{2} \sum_{j=1}^s x_j \sum_{i=1}^r a_i
\Psi_j^{(i)}(\mathbf{x}) = \frac{1}{2} \sum_{j=1}^s
x_j \Phi_j(\mathbf{a}; \mathbf{x}).\end{aligned}$$ Since rank $F \ge m$, the dimension of the linear space of linear forms spanned by the $\Phi_j(\mathbf{a}; \mathbf{x}) \; (1 \le j \le s)$ is at least $m$. Hence, by Lemma \[longport\], $$\label{hyde}
\#\{\mathbf{x} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^s:\mathbf{x} \in P^{\theta}{\mathcal{B}}\mbox{ and }
\Phi_j(\mathbf{a}; \mathbf{x}) = 0 \; (1 \le j \le s)\}
\ll (P^{\theta})^{s-m}.$$ The conditions (\[jekyll\]) and (\[hyde\]) are only compatible if $s-2k/\theta-\varepsilon \le s-m$, which implies that $k \ge m\theta/2-\varepsilon \frac{\theta}{2}$. Therefore, for $k=m\theta/2-\varepsilon$ alternative (iii) is impossible, which proves Lemma \[greenwhich\].
In the notation of Lemma \[england\], suppose that each quadratic form in the rational pencil of $F_1, \ldots, F_r$ has rank exceeding $2r^2+2r$. Moreover, let $0<\Delta\le r$. Then for each ${\mbox{\boldmath{$\alpha$}}}\in [0,1]^r$ we either (i) have $$\label{longitude}
S({\mbox{\boldmath{$\alpha$}}}) \ll P^{s-\Delta \left(r+1+\frac{1}{2r}\right)+\varepsilon},$$ (ii) or there exist integers $a_1, \ldots, a_r, q$ such that $(a_1, \ldots, a_r, q)=1$, $1 \le q \ll P^\Delta$ and $$|q\alpha_i-a_i| \ll P^{-2+\Delta} \;\;\; (1 \le i \le r).$$
This follows immediately from Lemma \[greenwhich\] on letting $\Delta=r\theta$ and $m=2r^2+2r+1$, noting that $\Delta\left(r+1+\frac{1}{2r}\right) =
\frac{1}{2r} \cdot r\theta \cdot m = \frac{m\theta}{2}$.
Note that this is essentially the same as Lemma 6 in [@S1] (our bound (\[longitude\]) is slightly stronger than (i) in Lemma 6 in [@S1], under the weaker rank condition $2r^2+2r$ instead of $2r^2+3r$). We can now proceed exactly as in [@S1] to deduce Theorem \[see\].
Systems of cubic forms {#maritime}
======================
The cubic case is slightly more difficult. We start our discussion with the following result going back to Davenport and Lewis.
\[mappus\] Let $C(X_1, \ldots, X_s) \in {\mathbb{Z}}[X_1, \ldots, X_s]$ be a cubic form, given in the form $$C(X_1, \ldots, X_s) = \sum_{1 \le j_1, j_2, j_3 \le s}
c_{j_1, j_2, j_3} x_{j_1} x_{j_2} x_{j_3}$$ for symmetric integer coefficients $c_{j_1, j_2, j_3}$. Moreover, let $B_j$ be the bilinear forms $$B_j(\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \mathbf{x}^{(2)}) = \sum_{1 \le j_1, j_2 \le s}
c_{j,j_1,j_2} x_{j_1}^{(1)} x_{j_2}^{(2)} \;\;\; (1 \le j \le s).$$ Then $$\begin{aligned}
\label{regen}
& \#\{\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \mathbf{x}^{(2)} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^s: \mathbf{x}^{(1)},
\mathbf{x}^{(2)} \in P{\mathcal{B}}\mbox{ and } B_j(\mathbf{x}^{(1)},
\mathbf{x}^{(2)}) = 0 \; (1 \le j \le s)\} \nonumber \\
\ll & P^{2s-h(C)},\end{aligned}$$ where $h(C)$ is the $h$-invariant of $C$ as introduced in section \[mallorca\]. The implied $O$-constant does not depend on $C$.
This is Lemma 3 in [@DL].
\[schiff\] Let $d=3$. Suppose that each cubic form in the rational pencil of $F_1, \ldots, F_r$ has $h$-invariant at least $m$. Then, using the notation of Lemma \[england\], we either (i) have $$S(\mathbf{{\mbox{\boldmath{$\alpha$}}}}) \ll P^{s-m\theta/4+\varepsilon},$$ or alternative (ii) (where $d=3$) of Lemma \[booker\] holds true.
Suppose that neither alternative (i) nor alternative (ii) of Lemma \[booker\] are true. Then by alternative (iii) of that lemma, there exists $\mathbf{a} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^r \backslash \{\mathbf{0}\}$ such that $M(a_1, \ldots, a_r; P^\theta) \gg
\left(P^\theta\right)^{2s-4k/\theta-\varepsilon}$. This means that $$\begin{aligned}
\label{liam}
& & \#\{\mathbf{x} \in {\mathbb{Z}}^s: \mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \mathbf{x}^{(2)} \in
P^\theta B \mbox{ and } \Phi_j(\mathbf{a}; \mathbf{x}^{(1)},
\mathbf{x}^{(2)})=0 \; (1 \le j \le s)\} \nonumber
\\ & \gg & (P^\theta)^{2s-4k/\theta-\varepsilon}.\end{aligned}$$ Now consider the cubic form $$C = \sum_{i=1}^r a_i F_i.$$ This form is in the rational pencil of $F_1, \ldots, F_r$, hence $h(C) \ge m$. Using the notation of Lemma \[mappus\], we find that $$c_{j_1,j_2,j_3} = \sum_{i=1}^r a_i c^{(i)}_{j_1, j_2, j_3},$$ hence $$\begin{aligned}
B_j(\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \mathbf{x}^{(2)}) & = &
\sum_{1 \le j_1, j_2 \le s} \sum_{i=1}^r a_i c_{j, j_1, j_2}^{(i)}
x_{j_1}^{(1)} x_{j_2}^{(2)} \;\;\; (1 \le j \le s)\\
& = & \sum_{i=1}^r a_i \sum_{1 \le j_1, j_2 \le s} c_{j,j_1,j_2}^{(i)}
x_{j_1}^{(1)} x_{j_2}^{(2)} \;\;\; (1 \le j \le s)\\
& = & \frac{1}{6} \sum_{i=1}^r a_i \Psi_j^{(i)}(\mathbf{x}^{(1)},
\mathbf{x}^{(2)}) = \frac{1}{6} \Phi_j(\mathbf{a}; \mathbf{x}^{(1)},
\mathbf{x}^{(2)}) \;\;\; (1 \le j \le s).\end{aligned}$$ Since $h(C) \ge m$, by Lemma \[mappus\] we have $$\label{neeson}
\#\{\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \mathbf{x}^{(2)} \in P^\theta {\mathcal{B}}\mbox{ and }
B_j(\mathbf{x}^{(1)}, \mathbf{x}^{(2)})=0 \;\;\; (1 \le j \le s)\} \ll
(P^\theta)^{2s-m}.$$ The conditions (\[liam\]) and (\[neeson\]) are only compatible if $$\label{dienstag}
2s-4k/\theta - \varepsilon \le 2s-m,$$ which implies that $k \ge m \theta / 4 - \varepsilon \frac{\theta}{4}$. As for Lemma \[greenwhich\] above, this concludes the proof.
\[windsor\_farm\_shop\] In the notation of Lemma \[england\], suppose that each cubic form in the rational pencil of $F_1, \ldots, F_r$ has $h$-invariant exceeding $8r^2+8r$. Moreover, let $0<\Delta \le 2r$. Then for each ${\mbox{\boldmath{$\alpha$}}}\in [0,1]^r$ we either (i) have $$\label{christopher_grill}
S({\mbox{\boldmath{$\alpha$}}}) \ll P^{s-\Delta\left(r+1+\frac{1}{8r}\right)+\varepsilon},$$ or (ii) there exist integers $a_1, \ldots, a_r, q$ such that $(a_1, \ldots, a_r, q)=1$, $1 \le q \ll P^{\Delta}$ and $$|q\alpha_i-a_i| \ll P^{-3+\Delta} \;\;\; (1 \le i \le r).$$
This follows immediately from Lemma \[schiff\] on setting $\Delta=2r\theta$ and $m=8r^2+8r+1$, noting that $\Delta\left(r+1+\frac{1}{8r}\right)
=\frac{1}{8r} \cdot 2r\theta \cdot m = \frac{m\theta}{4}$.
Note that this is essentially the same as Lemma 7 in [@S2] (our bound (\[christopher\_grill\]) is slightly stronger than the bound (i) in Lemma 7 in [@S2], under the weaker rank condition $8r^2+8r$ instead of $10r^2+6r$). We can now continue exactly as in [@S2] to deduce Theorem \[rumpsteak\].
Systems of higher degree forms {#thursday}
==============================
Let us briefly sketch how to obtain the result stated at the end of the introduction. The argument is almost completely analogous to that in section \[maritime\], all the hard work just being imported from [@Schmidt]. We have to replace bilinear forms by $(d-1)$-linear forms, and to replace Lemma \[mappus\] by Proposition III from [@Schmidt], yielding an upper bound of $$O(P^{(d-1)s-h(F)/\varphi(d)})$$ instead of , where $F$ is our form of degree $d$ under consideration, and $\varphi(2)=\varphi(3)=1$, $\varphi(4)=3$, $\varphi(5)=13$, and $\varphi(d)<(\log 2)^{-d} d!$ in general (see Proposition $\text{III}_{{\mathbb{C}}}$ in [@Schmidt]). One can then modify the proof of Lemma \[schiff\] accordingly, obtaining $$(d-1)s-2^{d-1}k/\theta-\varepsilon \le (d-1)s-m/\varphi(d)$$ instead of , which yields the analogue of Lemma \[schiff\] to the effect that if $F_1, \ldots, F_r$ are integer forms of degree $d$, and each form in their rational pencil has $h$-invariant at least $m$, then either $$S(\mathbf{{\mbox{\boldmath{$\alpha$}}}}) \ll P^{s-m\theta/(\varphi(d) 2^{d-1})+\varepsilon},$$ or alternative (ii) of Lemma \[booker\] holds true. Putting $\Delta=(d-1)r \theta$ and $$m=\varphi(d)(d-1)2^{d-1} r(r+1) + 1,$$ one finds that $$\Delta
\left( r+1+\frac{1}{r \varphi(d) (d-1) 2^{d-1}} \right)
= \frac{m \theta}{\varphi(d) 2^{d-1}},$$ giving the corresponding analogue of Corollary \[windsor\_farm\_shop\]: If each form in the rational pencil of $F_1, \ldots, F_r$ has $h$-invariant exceeding $\varphi(d) (d-1) 2^{d-1} r(r+1)$, then either $$S({\mbox{\boldmath{$\alpha$}}}) \ll P^{s-\Delta\left(r+1+
\frac{1}{r \varphi(d) (d-1) 2^{d-1}}\right)+\varepsilon},$$ or there exist integers $a_1, \ldots, a_r, q$ such that $(a_1, \ldots, a_r, q)=1$, $1 \le q \ll P^{\Delta}$ and $$|q\alpha_i-a_i| \ll P^{-d+\Delta} \;\;\; (1 \le i \le r).$$ Using the techniques from [@B], one can then establish the announced asymptotic formula for the number of integer zeros of $F_1=\ldots=F_r=0$ in an expanding box.
[10]{} <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Aleksandrov, A.G. & Moroz, B.J.</span> [Complete intersections in relation to a paper of B.J. Birch, *Bull. London. Math. Soc.* **34** (2002), 149–154.]{} <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Birch, B.J.</span> [Forms in many variables, *Proc. Royal Soc. A* **265** (1962), 245–263.]{} <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Colliot-Thélène, J., Sansuc, J. & Swinnerton-Dyer, P.</span> [Intersection of two quadrics and Châtelet surfaces. I., *J. Reine Angew. Math.* **373** (1987), 37–107.]{} <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Davenport, H. & Lewis, D.J.</span> [Non-homogeneous cubic equations, *J. London Math. Soc.* **39** (1964), 657–671.]{} <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Dietmann, R.</span> [Systems of rational quadratic forms, *Arch. Math. (Basel)* **82** (2004), 507–516.]{} <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Heath-Brown, D.R.</span> [Zeros of Pairs of Quadratic Forms, *arXiv:1304.3894*.]{} <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Meyer, A.</span> [Über die Auflösung der Gleichung $ax^2+by^2+cz^2+du^2+eu^2=0$ in ganzen Zahlen, *Vierteljahresschrift Natur. Ges. Zürich* **29**, 220–222 (1884).]{} <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Munshi, R.</span> [Pairs of quadrics in $11$ variables, *arXiv:1305.1461*.]{} <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Schindler, D.</span> [A variant of Weyl’s inequality for systems of forms and applications, *arXiv:1403.7156*]{} <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Schmidt, W.M.</span> [Simultaneous rational zeros of quadratic forms, Seminar of Number Theory, Paris 1980–81, *Progr. Math.* **22** (1982), 281–307.]{} <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Schmidt, W.M.</span> [On cubic polynomials. IV. Systems of rational equations, *Monatsh. Math.* **93** (1982), 329–348.]{} <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Schmidt, W.M.</span> [The density of integer points on homogeneous varieties, *Acta Math.* **154** (1985), 243–296.]{}
[^1]: This work has been supported by grant EP/I018824/1 ‘Forms in many variables’.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We report a four qubit polynomial invariant that quantifies genuine four-body correlations. The four qubit invariants are obtained from transformation properties of three qubit invariants under a local unitary on the fourth qubit.'
author:
- 'S. Shelly Sharma'
- 'N. K. Sharma'
title: Genuine Four Tangle for Four Qubit States
---
[ address=[Depto. de Fisica, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina 86051-990, PR Brazil]{} ]{}
[ address=[Depto. de Matematica, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina 86051-990, PR Brazil]{} ]{}
Two multipartite pure states are equivalent under stochastic local operations and classical communication (SLOCC) [@vers02] if one can be obtained from the other with some probability using SLOCC. Attempts [@lama07; @li09] to classify four-qubit pure states under SLOCC, have revealed that several entanglement classes contain a continuous range of strictly nonequivalent states, although with similar structure. In view of this, we proposed classification criteria [@shar12] based on nature of multiqubit correlations in N-qubit pure states. In this article, we examine the three qubit invariants of four qubit states and derive higher degree invariants to quantify four and three-way correlations.
For a two qubit state, negative eigenvalue of partially transposed state operator is the invariant that distinguishes between a separable and an entangled state. In three qubit state space, two qubit subspace (for a selected pair of qubits) is characterized by a pair of two qubit invariants, while new two qubit invariants arise due to three body correlations in the composite space. The most important three qubit polynomial invariant is a degree four combination of two qubit invariants. The entanglement monotone constructed from this is Wootter’s three tangle [@coff00]. Four qubit states sit in the space $C^{2}\otimes
C^{2}\otimes C^{2}\otimes C^{2}$ with three qubit subspaces for each set of three qubits. If there were no four body correlations, then three tangles should determine the entanglement of a four qubit state. When four body correlations are present, additional three qubit invariants that depend on four way negativity fonts [@shar102] exist. Three qubit invariants, for a given set of three qubits, constitute a five dimensional space. In this article, we obtain four qubit invariants using transformation properties of three qubit invariants under a local unitary applied to the fourth qubit. One can continue the process to a higher number of qubits.
Five Three tangles
==================
Two qubit unitary invariants for pair of qubits $A_{1}A_{2}$ in the most general four qubit state$$\left\vert \Psi ^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}A_{4}}\right\rangle
=\sum_{i_{1}i_{2}i_{3}i_{4}}a_{i_{1}i_{2}i_{3}i_{4}}\left\vert
i_{1}i_{2}i_{3}i_{4}\right\rangle ;\quad \left( i_{m}=0,1\right) ,$$are $D_{\left( A_{3}\right) _{i_{3}}\left( A_{4}\right) _{i_{4}}}^{00}$, $%
D_{\left( A_{3}\right) _{i_{3}}}^{00i_{4}}-D_{\left( A_{3}\right)
_{i_{3}}}^{01i_{4}}$, $D_{\left( A_{4}\right) _{i_{4}}}^{00i_{3}}-D_{\left(
A_{4}\right) _{i_{4}}}^{01i_{3}}$, $D^{0000}-D^{0100}$, $D^{0001}-D^{0101}$, where$$D_{\left( A_{3}\right) _{i_{3}}\left( A_{4}\right) _{i_{4}}}^{00}=\det \left[
\begin{array}{cc}
a_{00i_{3}i_{4}} & a_{01i_{3}i_{4}} \\
a_{10i_{3}i_{4}} & a_{11i_{3}i_{4}}%
\end{array}%
\right], D^{0i_{2}0i_{4}}=\det \left[
\begin{array}{cc}
a_{0i_{2}0i_{4}} & a_{0,i_{2}+1,1,i_{4}+1} \\
a_{1i_{2}0i_{4}} & a_{1,i_{2}+1,1,i_{4}+1}%
\end{array}%
\right] ,$$$$D_{\left( A_{3}\right) _{i_{3}}}^{0i_{2}0}=\det \left[
\begin{array}{cc}
a_{0i_{2}i_{3}0} & a_{0i_{2}+1i_{3}1} \\
a_{1i_{2}i_{3}0} & a_{1i_{2}+1i_{3}1}%
\end{array}%
\right] , D_{\left( A_{4}\right) _{i_{4}}}^{0i_{2}0}=\det \left[
\begin{array}{cc}
a_{0i_{2}0i_{4}} & a_{0i_{2}+1,1i_{4}} \\
a_{1i_{2}0i_{4}} & a_{1i_{2}+1,1i_{4}}%
\end{array}%
\right] .$$ For qubits $A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}$ in $\left\vert \Psi
^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}A_{4}}\right\rangle $, three qubit invariants $$\left( I_{3}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}\right) _{\left( A_{4}\right) _{i_{4}}}=\left(
D_{\left( A_{4}\right) _{i_{4}}}^{000}-D_{\left( A_{4}\right)
_{i_{4}}}^{010}\right) ^{2}-4D_{\left( A_{3}\right) _{0}\left( A_{4}\right)
_{i_{4}}}^{00}D_{\left( A_{3}\right) _{1}\left( A_{4}\right)
_{i_{4}}}^{00};\quad i_{4}=0,1.$$quantify GHZ state like three-way correlations in three qubit state space. We examine the action of U$^{A_{4}}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+\left\vert y\right\vert ^{2}}}\left[
\begin{array}{cc}
1 & -y^{\ast } \\
y & 1%
\end{array}%
\right] $ on invariant $\left( I_{3}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}\right) _{\left( A_{4}\right)
_{0}}$. The transformed invariant is a combination of five three qubit invariants that is$$\begin{aligned}
\left( I_{3}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}\right) _{\left( A_{4}\right) _{0}}^{\prime }&
=\frac{1}{\left( 1+\left\vert y\right\vert ^{2}\right) ^{2}}\left[ \left(
y^{\ast }\right) ^{4}\left( I_{3}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}\right) _{\left(
A_{4}\right) _{1}}-4\left( y^{\ast }\right) ^{3}P_{\left( A_{4}\right)
_{1}}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}\right. \nonumber \\
& \left. +6\left( y^{\ast }\right) ^{2}T_{A_{4}}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}-4y^{\ast
}P_{\left( A_{4}\right) _{0}}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}+\left(
I_{3}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}\right) _{\left( A_{4}\right) _{0}}\right] .\end{aligned}$$Here prime denotes the transformed invariant and additional invariants are $$\begin{aligned}
T_{A_{4}}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}} &=&\frac{1}{6}\left(
D^{0000}+D^{0001}+D^{0010}+D^{0011}\right) ^{2} \nonumber \\
&&-\frac{2}{3}\left( D_{\left(
A_{3}\right) _{0}}^{000}+D_{\left( A_{3}\right) _{0}}^{001}\right) \left(
D_{\left( A_{3}\right) _{1}}^{000}+D_{\left( A_{3}\right) _{1}}^{001}\right)
\nonumber \\
&&+\frac{1}{3}\left( D_{_{\left( A_{4}\right) _{0}}}^{000}+D_{_{\left(
A_{4}\right) _{0}}}^{001}\right) \left( D_{_{\left( A_{4}\right)
_{1}}}^{000}+D_{_{\left( A_{4}\right) _{1}}}^{001}\right) \nonumber \\
&&-\frac{2}{3}\left( D_{\left( A_{3}\right) _{0}\left( A_{4}\right)
_{0}}^{00}D_{\left( A_{3}\right) _{1}\left( A_{4}\right)
_{1}}^{00}+D_{\left( A_{3}\right) _{1}\left( A_{4}\right)
_{0}}^{00}D_{\left( A_{3}\right) _{0}\left( A_{4}\right) _{1}}^{00}\right), \end{aligned}$$ $$\begin{aligned}
P_{\left( A_{4}\right) _{i_{4}}}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}& =\frac{1}{2}\left(
D_{_{\left( A_{4}\right) _{i_{4}}}}^{000}+D_{_{\left( A_{4}\right)
_{i_{4}}}}^{001}\right) \left( D^{0000}+D^{0001}+D^{0010}+D^{0011}\right) \nonumber \\
& -\left( D_{\left( A_{3}\right) _{1}\left( A_{4}\right)
_{i_{4}}}^{00}\left( D_{_{\left( A_{3}\right) _{0}}}^{000}+D_{_{\left(
A_{3}\right) _{0}}}^{001}\right) +D_{\left( A_{3}\right) _{0}\left(
A_{4}\right) _{i_{4}}}^{00}\left( D_{_{\left( A_{3}\right)
_{1}}}^{000}+D_{_{\left( A_{3}\right) _{1}}}^{001}\right) \right).\end{aligned}$$ Five three tangles, constructed from invariants $\left( I_{3}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}\right) _{\left( A_{4}\right)
_{i_{4}}}$, $\left( I_{3}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}\right) _{\left( A_{4}\right)
_{i_{4}}}$, $P_{\left( A_{4}\right) _{0}}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}$, $P_{\left(
A_{4}\right) _{1}}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}$ , and $T_{A_{4}}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}$, capture the entanglement of $A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}$ due to three and four-way correlations.
Genuine four tangle
===================
Continuing the search for a four qubit invariant that detects genuine four-way correlations, we notice that when a selected U$^{A_{4}}$ results in $%
\left( I_{3}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}\right) _{\left( A_{4}\right)
_{0}}^{\prime }=0,$ we have at hand a quartic equation. A quartic equation, $y^{4}a-4by^{3}+6y^{2}c-4dy+f=0$, in variable $y$ has associated polynomial invariants, $S=af-4bd+3c^{2}$, cubic invariant $%
T=acf-ad^{2}-b^{2}f+2bcd-c^{3},$ and discriminant $\Delta =S^{3}-27T^{2}$. Therefore, the degree eight polynomial invariant associated with $
\left( I_{3}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}\right) _{\left( A_{4}\right) _{0}}
^{\prime }=0$ is$$I_{(4,8)}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}A_{4}}=3\left(
T_{A_{4}}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}\right) ^{2}+\left(
I_{3}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}\right) _{\left( A_{4}\right) _{0}}\left(
I_{3}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}\right) _{\left( A_{4}\right) _{1}}-4P_{\left(
A_{4}\right) _{0}}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}P_{\left( A_{4}\right)
_{1}}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}.$$The discriminant is given by $\Delta = \left(
I_{4}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}A_{4}}\right)^{3}-27\left(
J^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}A_{4}}\right) ^{2}$, where$$J^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}A_{4}}=\det \left[
\begin{array}{ccc}
\left( I_{3}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}\right) _{\left( A_{4}\right) _{1}} &
P_{\left( A_{4}\right) _{1}}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}} & T_{A_{4}}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}
\\
P_{\left( A_{4}\right) _{1}}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}} & T_{A_{4}}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}
& P_{\left( A_{4}\right) _{0}}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}} \\
T_{A_{4}}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}} & P_{\left( A_{4}\right) _{0}}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}
& \left( I_{3}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}}\right) _{\left( A_{4}\right) _{0}}%
\end{array}%
\right] .$$We may mention here that since there are four ways in which a given set of three qubits may be selected, $\Delta $ can be expressed in terms of different sets of three qubit invariants.
The four tangle $\tau_{(4,8)}=4\left\vert \left( 12I_{(4,8)}^{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}A_{4}}\right)
^{\frac{1}{2}}\right\vert$ quantifies $4-$way correlations [@shar131]. If four tangle is zero then transformation equations acquire a simpler form and yield four qubit invariants that quantify $3-$way correlations. Invariant to quantify entanglement of a four qubit state having purely two qubit correlations can also be easily obtained. What is the utility of these polynomial invariants? Quantum entanglement distributed between distinct parties is a physical resource for practical quantum information processing. Polynomial invariants are used to construct entanglement monotones to quantify entanglement.
Financial support from CNPq Brazil and FAEP UEL Brazil is acknowledged.
[9]{}
F. Verstraete, J. Dehaene, B. DeMoor, and H. Verschelde, *Phys. Rev. A* **65**, 052112 (2002).
L. Lamata, J. Leon, D. Salgado and E. Solano, *Phys. Rev. A* **75**, 022318 (2007).
D. Li, X. Li, H. Huang, and X. Li, *Quant. Inf. Comp.* **9**, 0778 (2009).
S. S. Sharma and N. K. Sharma, *Phys. Rev. A* **85**, 042315 (2012).
V. Coffman, J. Kundu, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 61, 052306 (2000).
S. S. Sharma and N. K. Sharma, *Phys. Rev. A* **82**, 052340 (2010).
S. S. Sharma and N. K. Sharma, *Phys. Rev. A* **87**, 022335(2013).
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We describe an algorithm for computing the Picard-Fuchs equation for a family of twists of a fixed elliptic surface. We then apply this algorithm to obtain the equation for several examples, which are coming from families of Kummer surfaces over Shimura curves, as studied in our previous work. We use this to find correspondenced between the parameter spaces of our families and Shimura curves. These correspondences can sometimes be proved rigorously.'
address:
- |
School Of Mathematical And Statistical Sciences\
Arizona State University\
PO Box 871804, Tempe, AZ, 85287-1804\
USA
- |
Einstein Institute of Mathematics\
Edmond J. Safra Campus, Givat Ram\
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem\
Jerusalem, 91904\
Israel
author:
- Amnon Besser
- Ron Livné
title: 'Picard-Fuchs equations of families of QM abelian surfaces'
---
Introduction {#sec:intro}
============
Let $\pi: X\to {\mathbb{P}}^1$ be a family of complex algebraic varieties. As $s\in {\mathbb{P}}^1 $ varies, the periods of the fibers $X_s$, i.e., integrals of holomorphically varying differential forms against a topologically constant family of homology classes, satisfies a certain differential equation, known as the *Picard-Fuchs* equation, whose coefficients are rational functions. These equations and their power series solutions are interesting in several respects.
Many of the previously studied examples where of families of elliptic curves with some extra structure. In hope of finding new applications, we decided to study the related families associated with Shimura curves.
Recall that if $B$ is a division quaternion algebra over the field ${\mathbb{Q}}$ of rational numbers, which is unramified at $\infty$ in the sense that $B\otimes_{\mathbb{Q}}{\mathbb{R}}{\cong}\operatorname{M}_{2\times 2}
({\mathbb{R}})$, and if $\mathcal{M}$ is a maximal order in $B$, the group $\Gamma$ of norm one elements in $\mathcal{M}$ embedds in ${\operatorname{SL}_2(\mathbb{R})}$, via the embedding of $B$ in $\operatorname{M}_{2\times 2} ({\mathbb{R}})$, as a discrete subgroup. The quotients of the complex upper half plane ${\mathcal{H}}$ by $\Gamma$, and more generally by finite subgroups $\Gamma'\subset \Gamma$, are algebraizable as moduli spaces of abelian surfaces whose endomorphism algebras are certain orders in $\mathcal{M}$ (so called QM abelian surfaces), together with some extra structures. Under mild assumptions they carry a universal family of such abelian surfaces. Since K3 surfaces are easier to write down, it is natural to consider instead the universal family of the associated Kummer surfaces obtained by taking the quotient under multiplication by $\pm 1$.
In trying to write explicit equations for QM Kummer surfaces, we were led to study in [@Bes-Liv10] families of quadratic twists of a fixed elliptic surface (see Section \[sec:elliptic\]). We identified 11 examples as related to QM Kummer surfaces. In each of these examples we have a family of varieties over ${\mathbb{P}}^1$ for which we know that the generic fiber is isogenous, in a possibly complicated way, to a Kummer surface associated with a QM abelian surface. Consequently, there is a correspondence between the base spaces for these families, and a Shimura curve. In [@Bes-Liv10] we carried out a detailed analysis of this correspondence, which was highly involved and required a delicate study of finite discriminant forms.
The main contribution of the present work is Algorithm \[mainalg\] which computes the Picard-Fuchs equation for a family of twists of a fixed elliptic surface, together with Theorem \[mainthm\] that claims its validity. A nice feature of our alogorithm is that it only requires knowledge of the Picard-Fuchs equation of the elliptic surface being twisted. As input to our algorithm we thus need a method for computing the Picard-Fuchs equation for an elliptic surface. We describe an algorithm for doing this borrowed from a MAPLE script of F. Beukers. We prove that the algorithm works since we have found no record of this in the literature.
After describing the algorithm and the proof of the main theorem, we apply the algorithm to the study of the families of QM Kummer surfaces described above. In all of the examples we expect the resulting Picard-Fuchs equation to be of degree $3$ and to further be a symmetric square (see Section \[sec:k3\]) of a degree $2$ equation. This turns out indeed to be the case and we list the resulting degree $2$ equations.
On the Shimra curve side, these degree $2$ equations have been studied by Elkies in [@Elk98]. This suggests a method of discovering and verifying the correspondeces between the bases of the families we study and the related Shimura curve, using these Picard-Fuchs equations. We describe this in all the examples. We note that while this method falls short of a rigorous proof of the existence of a correspondence between the underlying moduli problems, it is far easier than the analysis carried out in [@Bes-Liv10]. In fact, we needed the results of the present work to exclude some possibilities in [@Bes-Liv10] and furthermore, one of the cases there is left unproved even though we know the correspondece using Picard-Fuchs techniques.
The Picard-Fuchs equation {#sec:generalities}
=========================
We briefly recall the Picard-Fuchs differential equation for a family of varieties over a curve. For further details see for example [@Pet86].
Let $C$ be a complex analytic curve and let $V/C$ be a local system of ${\mathbb{C}}$-vector spaces of dimension $n$ over $C$. The analytic rank $n$ vector bundle ${\mathcal{V}}:= V\otimes_{{\mathbb{C}}} {\mathcal{O}}_C$ carries a canonical connection $\nabla$ defined by the condition that it vanishes on sections of $V$. We fix a meromorphic vector field ${{d/dt}}$ on $C$, e.g., the one associated with a rational parameter $t$ if $C={\mathbb{P}}^1$. Recall that ${{d/dt}}$ induces a *covariant derivative* operator $$\nabla_{{d/dt}}: {\mathcal{V}}\to {\mathcal{V}}\;.$$
Let $\alpha$ be a meromorphic section of ${\mathcal{V}}$. Since ${\mathcal{V}}$ has rank $n$, there is going to be a relation $$\sum_{i=0}^m a_i (\nabla_{{d/dt}})^i \alpha =0$$ with $m\le n$ and with $a_i$ meromorphic functions on $C$. We may normalize this by insisting that $a_m=1$.
Suppose $\gamma \in V^\ast(U)$, for some open $U\in C$, where $V^\ast$ is the dual of $V$. The evaluation of $\gamma$ on $\alpha$, which we suggestively write as $\int_\gamma \alpha$, is a meromorphic function on $U$ and is called a *period* of $\alpha$. Since $\nabla$ vanishes on sections of $V$ it follows easily that the period $\int_\gamma \alpha$ satisfies the differential equation $$\frac{d^m}{dt^m} y + \sum_{i=0}^{m-1} a_i \frac{d^i}{dt^i} y =0\;,$$ which is called the *Picard-Fuchs* equation associated with $\alpha$.
When $V$ comes from geometry, a bit more can be said. Suppose that $\pi: X\to C$ is a smooth projective family of algebraic varieties, and that $V$ is the family of cohomology groups $$V = {\mathbb{R}}^l \pi_\ast {\mathbb{C}}$$ For some non-negative integer $l$. In this case, ${\mathcal{V}}$ is canonically identifies with the vector bundle of *de Rham* cohomology groups, $${\mathcal{V}}{\cong}{\mathbb{R}}^l \pi_\ast \Omega_{X/C}^\bullet \;,$$ and the connection $\nabla$ is identified with the *Gauss-Manin* connection on the latter vector bundle. If $C$ and $\pi$ are algebraic, it follows easily that we may take $\alpha$ to be an algebraic (meromorphic) section of ${\mathcal{V}}$ and that then the coefficients $a_i$ in the Picard-Fuchs equation will be rational functions on $C$. We will call this a Picard-Fuchs equation associated with the $H^l $ of the family.
In geometric situations we may futher take $\alpha$ to be a section in the sub-bundle $\pi_\ast \Omega_{X/C}^l$ and we may take $\gamma$ to be a family of Homology classes, so that the associated period is now indeed the integral $\int_\gamma \alpha$.
In applications, it will always be the case that the sub-bundle $\pi_\ast \Omega_{X/C}^l$ will be of rank $1$. Thus, $\alpha$ is determined up to a product by a rational function. The Picard-Fuchs equation is in some sense unique then, since we may recover easily the equation associated with such a product from the equation for $\alpha$ (see also Section \[sec:schwartzian\] for how to remove the remaining ambiguity).
We can also consider Picard-Fuchs equations associated with sub-local systems $V\subset {\mathbb{R}}^l \pi_\ast {\mathbb{C}}$ provided our chosen $\alpha$ resides in $V\otimes {\mathcal{O}}_C$.
We now list the local systems considered in this work. Let ${\mathcal{H}}$ be the complex upper half plane. We have a family of elliptic curves $\pi^u: E^u\to {\mathcal{H}}$ where for $\tau\in {\mathcal{H}}$ we have $$E_\tau^u = {\mathbb{C}}/{\mathbb{Z}}\langle 1,\tau\rangle\;.$$ We consider the resulting local system $${\mathcal{S}h}:= {\mathbb{R}}^1 \pi_\ast {\mathbb{C}}\;,$$ which has a constand fiber ${\mathbb{C}}^2$. See [@Zuck79 § 12] for a detailed discussion. Note that $\pi_\ast^u \Omega_{E^u/{\mathcal{H}}}^1 $ has the section $dz$, where $z$ is the standard coordinate on ${\mathbb{C}}$, whose associated periods are $1$ and $\tau$, hence its Picard-Fuchs equation is $y''=0$.
Let $\Gamma\subset {\operatorname{SL}_2(\mathbb{R})}$ be a discrete group, acting on ${\mathcal{H}}$ by fractional linear transformations. It acts on ${\mathcal{S}h}$ in the via the standard representation of ${\operatorname{SL}_2(\mathbb{R})}$ on ${\mathbb{C}}^2$. When $\Gamma\subset {\operatorname{SL}_2(\mathbb{Z})}$ is a congruence subgroup, the quotient $X_\Gamma :=\Gamma \backslash {\mathcal{H}}$ has a family $E_\Gamma :=\Gamma \backslash E^u$ of elliptic curves above it, and both are algebraizable. The quotient $\Gamma \backslash {\mathcal{S}h}$ is a local system on $X_\Gamma$, isomorphic to $ {\mathbb{R}}^1 \pi_\ast^\Gamma {\mathbb{C}}$, with $\pi^\Gamma$ the induced projection.
Let $B$ be an indefinite rational quaternion algebra and let $\Gamma\ \subset B^\times $ be as in the introduction. Let $\pi^u: A^u\to X_\Gamma$ be the associated universal family of abelian surfaces with quaternionic multiplication. Then (see [@Bes95]) the local system ${\mathbb{R}}^2 \pi_\ast^u {\mathbb{C}}$ splits as a direct sum of a $3$-dimensional local system and a system isomorphic to the symmetric square of ${\mathcal{S}h}$, ${\operatorname{Symm}}^2({\mathcal{S}h}) $.
For any family $\pi^A: A\to X$ of abelian surfaces, let $\pi^S:
S={\operatorname{Kummer}}(A)\to X $ be the associated family of Kummer surfaces. Then, the local system ${\mathbb{R}}^2 \pi_\ast^S {\mathbb{C}}$ splits as a sum of a $16$-dimensional trivial system and ${\mathbb{R}}^2 \pi_\ast^A {\mathbb{C}}$. In particular, when $A=A^u$ we see that ${\mathbb{R}}^2 \pi_\ast^S {\mathbb{C}}$ splits as a sum of a $19$-dimensional trivial system and ${\operatorname{Symm}}^2({\mathcal{S}h})
$. Furthermore, we have $\pi_\ast^S \Omega_{S/X}^2 \subset
{\operatorname{Symm}}^2({\mathcal{S}h})\otimes {\mathcal{O}}_{X_\Gamma} $. Consequently the Picard-Fuchs equation satisfied by the periods of a relative $2$-form $\omega $ on $S$ is going to be of degree $3$, and will be the symmetric square of a Picard-Fuchs equation of degree $2$ associated with the local system ${\mathcal{S}h}$ (see Section \[sec:k3\] for symmetric squares of equations).
Elliptic surfaces and their Picard-Fuchs equations {#sec:elliptic}
==================================================
An elliptic surface, always considered over ${\mathbb{P}}^1$, is a smooth and connected compact complex algebraic surface $E$, together with a surjective morphism $\pi: E\to {\mathbb{P}}^1$, such that the generic fiber is a curve of genus $1$. We will always assume that the fibration is relatively minimal and has a given section, denoted $0$.
For all but a finite number of points $s\in
{\mathbb{P}}^1$, the fiber $E_s=\pi^{-1}(s)$ is an elliptic curve. The singular locus $\Sigma =
\Sigma(E)$ of the fibration is the (finite) subset of ${\mathbb{P}}^1$ over which the fibers are singular (namely $\pi$ is not everywhere smooth). Kodaira [@Kod62] classified all possible types of singular fibers (see also [@BHPV04 Chapter V.7]).
The generic fiber of an elliptic surface may be given by a Weierstrass equation of the form $y^2=f(x)$, where $f(x)=ax^3+bx^2+cx+d$ and $a,b,c,d$ are rational functions of the parameter $t$ on ${\mathbb{P}}^1$.
Given two distinct points $\alpha$ and $\beta$ in ${\mathbb{P}}^1$, the quadratic twist $E_{\alpha,\beta}$ at these points can be described in two ways. Algebraically, if $E$ has Weierstrass equation $y^2=f(x)$ and $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are finite points, then $E_{\alpha,\beta}$ has equation $$\label{twisteq}
\frac{t-\alpha}{t-\beta}y^2= f(x)\;.$$ Analytically, $E_{\alpha,\beta}$ can be described as follows. Take the double cover $B'\to {\mathbb{P}}^1$ ramified at $\alpha$ and $\beta$ and let $E{^\prime}$ be the pullback surface. Now quotient $E{^\prime}$ by the transformation which identifies the two fibers above each fiber of $E$ with sign $-1$.
\[famtwist\] Let $E\to {\mathbb{P}}^1$ be an elliptic surface as above with $s\in\Sigma=\Sigma(E)$. For $\lambda\in{\mathbb{P}}^1-\Sigma$ let $E_{s,\lambda}$ be the twisted family at $s$ and at $\lambda$. These surfaces vary in a family ${\mathcal{TW}}_{s}(E)$ over the *$\lambda$-line* ${\mathbb{P}}^1(\lambda)-\Sigma$.
The local system ${\mathbb{R}}^1 \pi_\ast {\mathbb{C}}$ over ${\mathbb{P}}^1-\Sigma$ has dimension $2$. Its dual is the *homological invariant* (tensored with ${\mathbb{C}}$) associated by Kodaira to the elliptic surface, and we denote it by $F$.
A Picard-Fuchs equation for the $H^1$ of a general elliptic sufrace $E$, corresponding to the invariant differential $\omega = dx/y $, can be computed using Algorithm \[ellipticpf\]. It is taken from a MAPLE script of F. Beukers (see Section \[sec:software\]). We failed to find it documented anywhere so we give a short proof that it indeed works.
\[ellipticpf\] $f \leftarrow ax^3+bx^2+cx+d $ $f_t \leftarrow \frac{\partial f}{\partial t}$ $f_{tt} \leftarrow \frac{\partial f_t}{\partial t}$ $f_x \leftarrow \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}$ $q \leftarrow q_4 x^4 + q_3 x^3 + q_2 x^2 + q_1 x+q_0$ $q_x \leftarrow \frac{\partial q}{\partial x}$ $e \leftarrow \frac{-f_{tt} \cdot f}{2}+ \frac{3 f_t^2}{4} - c_1
\frac{f_t \cdot f}{2}+c_2 f^2+ \frac{3 f_x \cdot q}{2}-f\cdot q_x$ $C \leftarrow $ $(c_1,c_2,q_0,q_1,q_2,q_3,q_4) \leftarrow$
Algortithm \[ellipticpf\] gives the Picard-Fuchs equation for the elliptic surface $E$.
We express $y$ in terms of $x$ as $y= f(x)^{1/2}$. Applying the covariant Gauss-Manin differentiation with respect to $t$ amounts to differentiating (after eliminating $y$) with respect to $t$. On the invariant differential $\omega = f(x)^{-1/2}
dx$ we find $$\begin{aligned}
\nabla_{{d/dt}}\omega &= -\frac{1}{2} f^{-\frac{3}{2}} f_t dx\\
\nabla_{{{d/dt}}}^2 \omega &= \left(\frac{3}{4} f^{-\frac{5}{2}} f_{t}^2
-\frac{1}{2} f^{-\frac{3}{2}} f_{tt}\right) dx\;.\end{aligned}$$ Now we may write the general differential operator of degree $2$ applied to $\omega$, $$\label{pfside1}
\nabla_{{{d/dt}}}^2 \omega + c_1 \nabla_{{d/dt}}\omega + c_2 \omega
= \left(\frac{3}{4} f^{-\frac{5}{2}} f_{t}^2
-\frac{1}{2} f^{-\frac{3}{2}} f_{tt} -\frac{1}{2}c_1
f^{-\frac{3}{2}} f_t + c_2 f^{-\frac{1}{2}} \right)dx\;.$$ For the appropriately chosen $c_1$ and $c_2$ this will give a trivial de Rham cohomology class on $E/{\mathbb{P}}^1$. Reduction theory (see for example [@Ked01]) tells us that it is going to be the differential of a rational function of the form $q(x)/y^n$ and examining the poles at the $2$-torsion points shows that one can take $n=3$ and $q$ a polynomial of degree at most $4$. This is given by $$\label{pfside2}
d \frac{q(x)}{y^3} = d \frac{q(x)}{f^{3/2}} = \left(-\frac{3}{2} q \cdot
f^{-\frac{5}{2}} \cdot f_x + q_x f^{-\frac{3}{2}}\right) dx\;$$ To find the Picard-Fuchs equation, we equate to , multiply by $f^{5/2}$ to clear denominators. This gives the quantity $e$ in the algorithm. Then we simply solve $e=0$, identically in $x$, expressing the $c$’s and $q$’s in terms of $t$.
The Picard-Fuchs equation for a family of twists {#sec:twists}
================================================
In this section we prove our main theorem, Theorem \[mainthm\], which describes the differential equation satisfied by the periods of the $H^2$ of the family of twists ${\mathcal{TW}}_{s}(E)$, described in Definition \[famtwist\], of a fixed elliptic surface $E$. We will in fact show that the periods for this $H^2$ can be recovered from the periods for $H^1$ of $E$ and the differential equation can be recovered solely based on a Picard-Fuchs equation for $H^1$ of $E$.
To simplify the notation, we assume that $s=0$, i.e., that the twists are at $0$ and a varying point. Recall from the description following that $E_{0,\lambda}$ can be obtained from $E$ as follows: One takes a double covering $\pi_\lambda: B'\to {\mathbb{P}}^1$ which is ramified exactly over $0$ and $\lambda$. Let $d_\lambda:B'\to B'$ be the deck trasformation of the covering. One considers the pullback $\pi_\lambda^\ast E$ and takes the quotient $\pi_\lambda^\ast E/D_\lambda$ where $D_\lambda$ is the map $(s,e)\mapsto (d_\lambda(s),-e)$, i.e., the map that identifies the fibers at $s$ and $d_\lambda(s)$ but via the map $-1$. The result may have singularities at the fixed points $0$ and $\lambda$ of $d_\lambda$ and resolving them one obtains $E_{0,\lambda}$. We henceforth ease notation and write $E_\lambda$ for $E_{0,\lambda}$.
We now write a homology class $\Gamma_\lambda \in H_2(E_\lambda,{\mathbb{C}})
$. We will obtain $\Gamma_\lambda $ by modifying a fixed homology class $\Gamma'\in H_2(E,{\mathbb{C}}) $. In fact, we take $\Gamma'$ in $H_1({\mathbb{P}}^1-\Sigma,F)$, where $F$ is the homological invariant (see Section \[sec:elliptic\]). An element of $H_1({\mathbb{P}}^1-\Sigma,F) $ consists of a formal sum $\sum (\gamma_i,x_i)$ where $\gamma_i$ are paths in ${\mathbb{P}}^1-\Sigma$ and $x_i$ is a section of $F_{\gamma_i}$, in such a way that the obvious boundary map vanishes. Write the one form on the elliptic surface $E$, $dx/y$, as a family of differential forms $\omega_t$ and consider the function $G_i$ on the path $\gamma_i$ given at a point $t$ by $G_i(t) = \int_{x_i(t)} \omega_t$.
Having fixed $\Gamma'$ we can write a family of $2$ homology classes $\Gamma_\lambda \in H_2(E_\lambda,{\mathbb{C}})$ as follows. Each path $\gamma_i$ can be pulled back to $B'$. If one of the pullbacks is $\delta_i$ then the other one is $d_\lambda(\delta_i) $. The section $x_i$ pull back to both of these lifts. Since we identify the fiber at $s$ with the fiber at $d_\lambda(s)$ via the map $-1$ and since $-1$ acts as $-1$ on the first homology it is clear that $\Gamma_\lambda^\prime :=\sum (\delta_i,x_i)+
\sum (d_\lambda(\delta_i),-x_i)$ descents to the required homology class $\Gamma_\lambda \in H_2(E_\lambda,{\mathbb{C}})$.
Let us now write explicitely a period associated with this homology class. We first need to write a holomorphic differential two form $\eta_\lambda$ on $E_\lambda$. We have a two form on $E$, $\eta = \omega_t \wedge dt$. We can write an affine model for $B'$, the double cover of ${\mathbb{P}}^1$ ramified at $0$ and $\lambda$, as $s^2=t(t-\lambda)$. The form $s^{-1}\cdot
\pi_\lambda^\ast $ has the right behavior with respect to deck transformations and therefore descents to the required form $\eta_\lambda$ on $E_\lambda$. Note that the choice of $s^{-1}$ as a multiplier eliminates the zeros that $dt$ acquires from the ramified cover. We now compute the period $\int_{\Gamma_\lambda}\eta_\lambda$. Let us write the function obtained by evaluating An easy computation shows this is equal to $$\begin{aligned}
&\phantom{=} \int_{\Gamma_\lambda^\prime} s^{-1} \pi_\lambda^\ast
\eta \\
&= \sum_i \left( \int_{\delta_i} s^{-1} G_i(\pi_\lambda(s))
\pi_\lambda^\ast dt + \int_{d_\lambda \delta_i} s^{-1} (-G_i(\pi_\lambda(s)))
\pi_\lambda^\ast dt\right)\\
&= 2 \sum_i \int_{\delta_i} s^{-1} G_i(\pi_\lambda(s))
\pi_\lambda^\ast dt \\
&= 2 \sum_i \int_{\gamma_i} (t(t-\lambda))^{-1/2} G_i(t) dt\;.\end{aligned}$$ Dividing by $2$ we get the period $$u(\lambda):=\sum \int_{\gamma_i} (t(t-\lambda))^{-1/2} G_i(t) dt$$
Our goal is now to compute a differential equation satisfied by $u$. In doing so, we will only use the fact that the $G_i$ satisfy the Picard-Fuchs equation for the elliptic family $E$, which we recalled in section \[sec:elliptic\], $$\label{eq:ellipticpf}
y''+c_1(t)y'+c_2(t)y = 0\; .$$
The computation is inspired by the computation in [@Clem03 2.10].
Suppose $y$ satisfies . Then, for a fixed $\lambda$, the function $z=z_\lambda=
(t(t-\lambda))^{-1/2} y$ satisfies the equation $$z''+{\alpha}_\lambda(t)z'+{\beta}_\lambda (t)z = 0$$ with $$\begin{aligned}
{\alpha}_\lambda(t)&= c_1(t)+\frac{2t-\lambda}{t(t-\lambda)}\\
{\beta}_\lambda(t)&= c_2(t)+c_1(t)\frac{2t-\lambda}{2t(t-\lambda)}-
\frac{\lambda^2}{4t^2(t-\lambda)^2}
\end{aligned}$$
A straightforward computation.
Suppose now that we are given two rational functions $p(t)=p_\lambda(t)$ and $q(t)=q_\lambda(t)$. We have $$(pz+qz')' = p'z+(p+q')z'+qz''$$ If we force the relation
$$p+q'={\alpha}_\lambda q\label{eq:keyrel}$$
then we can write $$p'z+(p+q')z'+qz'' = p'z+q(z''+{\alpha}_\lambda z')= p'z-q{\beta}_\lambda z\;,$$ by using the differential equation for $z$. The relation gives $p={\alpha}q-q'$ so that $p'={\alpha}'q+q'{\alpha}-q''$ and we finally end up with the relation $$(pz+qz')' = ({\alpha}'q+q'{\alpha}-q''-q{\beta})z\;.$$ Now, we can do the following: We have $u(\lambda) = \sum
\int_{\gamma_i} z_\lambda(t) dt$. Since $z$ depends on $\lambda$ only through division by $\sqrt{t-\lambda} $, we easily get by differentiating $n$ times with respect to $\lambda$ below the integral sign, $$\label{lamder}
\frac{d^n u}{d\lambda^n}= \frac{1\cdot 3\cdot\cdots \cdot
(2n-1)}{2^n} \sum_i \int_{\gamma_i} \frac{z}{(t-\lambda)^n} dt$$
There is a choice for $q$ such that we may expand $ {\alpha}'q+q'{\alpha}-q''-q{\beta}$ as a polynomial in $(t-\lambda)^{-1}$ with coefficients which are rational functions of $\lambda$, $$\label{eq:expand}
{\alpha}'q+q'{\alpha}-q''-q{\beta}= \sum_n c_n(\lambda) (t-\lambda)^{-n}$$
First let $q_0$ be the least common multiple of the denominators of ${\alpha}$ and ${\beta}$ as rational functions of $t$. Then, $ {\alpha}'q_0+q_0^\prime {\alpha}-q_0^{\prime\prime}-q_0 {\beta}$ is a polynomial in $t$ and can therefore also be written as a polynomial in $t-\lambda$, with coefficients which are rational functions of $\lambda$. Suppose that this polynomial has degree $m$. Then, we may simply take $q=q_0 (t-\lambda)^{-m}$.
We may modify the paths $\gamma_i$ to homotopic paths making sure that $\sqrt{t-\lambda}$ is single valued on each path. Also, the sums of the monodromies of the $G_i$ around the paths $\gamma_i$ is $0$ because $\Gamma'$ is closed. Thus, we have, $$\begin{aligned}
0 &= \sum_i \int_{\gamma_i} \frac{d}{dt}\left(p_\lambda z_\lambda +q_\lambda
\frac{d}{dt}z_\lambda \right) dt \\
&= \sum_i \int_{\gamma_i} \left(\frac{d{\alpha}_\lambda}{dt} q_\lambda +
\frac{d q_\lambda }{dt}{\alpha}_\lambda - \frac{d^2 q_\lambda}{dt^2}
-q_\lambda {\beta}_\lambda \right)z_\lambda dt \\
&= \sum_i \int_{\gamma_i} \sum_n c_n(\lambda) (t-\lambda)^{-n} z_\lambda dt \\
&= \sum_n c_n(\lambda) \sum_i \int_{\gamma_i} \frac{ z_\lambda}{(t-\lambda)^n} dt \\
&= \sum_n \tilde{c}_n(\lambda) \frac{d^n u}{d\lambda^n}\;,\end{aligned}$$ by , with $$\tilde{c}_n(\lambda) =\frac{2^n}{1\cdot 3\cdot\cdots \cdot
(2n-1)} c_n(\lambda)\;.$$ We therefore proved the following.
\[mainthm\] Let $E$ be an elliptic surface whose periods satisfy the differential equation . Then, algorithm \[mainalg\] computes a differential equation with polynomial coefficients satisfied by a non-trivial period for $H^2$ of the family ${\mathcal{TW}}_{0}(E)$.
\[mainalg\] ${\alpha}\leftarrow c_1(t)+\frac{2t-\lambda}{t(t-\lambda)}$ ${\beta}\leftarrow c_2(t)+c_1(t)\frac{2t-\lambda}{2t(t-\lambda)}-
\frac{\lambda^2}{4t^2(t-\lambda)^2} $ $q_0 \leftarrow$ $pol_0 \leftarrow {\alpha}'q_0+q_0^\prime {\alpha}-q_0^{\prime\prime}-q_0 {\beta}$ $m \leftarrow$ $q\leftarrow q_0 (t-\lambda)^{-m}$ $pol \leftarrow ({\alpha}'q+q'{\alpha}-q''-q{\beta})_{t\leftarrow s+\lambda}$ $c_n(\lambda) \leftarrow $ $\tilde{c}_n(\lambda) \leftarrow \frac{2^n}{1\cdot 3\cdot\cdots \cdot
(2n-1)} c_n(\lambda)$
K3 surfaces {#sec:k3}
===========
In [@Bes-Liv10] we studied a particluar class of elliptic fibrations. Out of the list of elliptic fibrations with $4$ singular fibers compiled by Herfurtner [@Her91], we picked out the ones for which the twists give K3 surfaces, generically with Picard number $19$. These K3 surfaces are then isogenous to Kummer surfaces associted with Abelian surfaces whose isogeny algebra is a rational quaternion algebra. We further picked out only the examples in which the quaternion algebra in question is indefinite There are 11 examples, which we list below (Table 1, see also [@Bes-Liv10 Table 1]). The method for deciding which families of twists correspond to quaternion algebras and the method for determining the discriminant of the associated algebra are detailed in [@Bes-Liv10 Proposition 2.4.1 and Lemma 2.5.1].
As discussed in Section \[sec:generalities\], for each of the examples above, the resulting Picard-Fuchs equation should be of degree $3$ and should be a symmetric square of a degree $2$ equation, which is a Picard-Fuchs equation for the Shimura local system descended to the base. In this section we verify that this is indeed the case, and we compute the degree $2$ equations.
Symmetric squares of differential equations are considered, for example in [@Pet86 Example 6.5.2]. Given a differential equation of degree $2$, $y''+ay'+by=0$, one looks for the equations satisfied by $z=y^2$. The result is $$\label{eq:symmsquare}
z'''+\alpha z''+ \beta z' + \gamma z = 0 \text{ with } \alpha=3a,\;
\beta= 4b+2 a^2 + a',\; \gamma= 4ab+2b'\;.$$ If we are given a differential equation of degree 3, we can check if it is a symmetric square of one of degree 2 and find the “square root” as described in Algorithm \[squareroot\]:
\[squareroot\] $a \leftarrow \alpha/3$ $b \leftarrow (\beta-2 a^2-a')/4$ $c \leftarrow \gamma-4ab-2b'$
Not surprisingly, in all 11 examples, the resulting differential equation turn out to be a symmetric square of an equation of degree 2. In table \[bigtablenew\] below we list the examples together with the resulting equations of degree 2 (one can recover the degree 3 equation using ).
The first column is the example number, which is the same as in Table \[bigtable\] in [@Bes-Liv10]. The second column gives the types of singular fibers for the based elliptic surface and their locations and the third column gives the coefficients of the degree $2$ equation. The final column gives the expected discriminant for the associated quaternion algebra. In the table $\gamma = \frac{-{\left( 1 +
{\sqrt{-2}} \right) }^4}{3}$ and $\delta =
\frac{{\left( 1 + {\sqrt{-7}} \right)
}^7}{512}$. Conjugates for such elements are over ${\mathbb{Q}}$.
$$\begin{array}{||l||l|l|l||}
1& {\begin{array}{l}
I_1 ,I_1 ,I_8 ,II \\#2\\#3\end{array}}&
{\begin{array}{c}
a= \frac{27 - 21\lambda +
6{\lambda }^2}{27\lambda - 14{\lambda }^2 +
3{\lambda }^3},~b= \frac{3\left( -1 - 6\lambda + 3{\lambda }^2
\right) }{16{\lambda }^2
\left( 27 - 14\lambda + 3{\lambda }^2 \right) }\\ \sigma=\frac{3\left( 945 - 652\lambda +
142{\lambda }^2 - 60{\lambda }^3 +
9{\lambda }^4 \right) }{4{\lambda }^2
{\left( 27 - 14\lambda + 3{\lambda }^2 \right)
}^2}\end{array}}&6\\\hline
2& {\begin{array}{l}
I_1 ,I_2 ,I_7 ,II \\#2\\#3\end{array}}&
{\begin{array}{c}
a= \frac{144 + 339\lambda + 144{\lambda }^2}
{144\lambda + 226{\lambda }^2 + 72{\lambda }^3},~b= \frac{-2 + 36\lambda + 27{\lambda }^2}
{4{\lambda }^2\left( 72 + 113\lambda +
36{\lambda }^2 \right) }\\ \sigma=\frac{20160 + 42008\lambda + 41331{\lambda }^2 +
17388{\lambda }^3 + 3888{\lambda }^4}{4
{\lambda }^2{\left( 72 + 113\lambda +
36{\lambda }^2 \right) }^2}\end{array}}&6\\\hline
3& {\begin{array}{l}
I_1 ,I_4 ,I_5 ,II \\#2\\#3\end{array}}&
{\begin{array}{c}
a= \frac{-5 + 119\lambda + 16{\lambda }^2}
{\lambda \left( -10 + 79\lambda +
8{\lambda }^2 \right) },~b= \frac{6\left( -1 + 7\lambda + 2{\lambda }^2
\right) }{{\left( 1 - 8\lambda \right) }^2
\lambda \left( 10 + \lambda \right) }\\ \sigma=\frac{3\left( 25 - 210\lambda +
2179{\lambda }^2 + 216{\lambda }^3 +
16{\lambda }^4 \right) }{{\left( 1 -
8\lambda \right) }^2{\lambda }^2
{\left( 10 + \lambda \right) }^2}\end{array}}&15\\\hline
4& {\begin{array}{l}
I_2 ,I_3 ,I_5 ,II \\#2\\#3\end{array}}&
{\begin{array}{c}
a= \frac{15 + 39\lambda - 36{\lambda }^2}
{30\lambda + 44{\lambda }^2 - 18{\lambda }^3},~b= \frac{-23 - 246\lambda + 81{\lambda }^2}
{48{\left( -3 + \lambda \right) }^2\lambda
\left( 5 + 9\lambda \right) }\\ \sigma=\frac{2025 + 4295\lambda + 9156{\lambda }^2 -
1809{\lambda }^3 + 729{\lambda }^4}{12
{\left( -3 + \lambda \right) }^2{\lambda }^2
{\left( 5 + 9\lambda \right) }^2}\end{array}}&10\\\hline
5& {\begin{array}{l}
I_1 ,I_1 ,I_7 ,III \\#2\\#3\end{array}}&
{\begin{array}{c}
a= \frac{64 + 39\lambda + 16{\lambda }^2}
{64\lambda + 26{\lambda }^2 + 8{\lambda }^3},~b= \frac{-2 + 4\lambda + 3{\lambda }^2}
{4{\lambda }^2\left( 32 + 13\lambda +
4{\lambda }^2 \right) }\\ \sigma=\frac{3840 + 2072\lambda + 43{\lambda }^2 +
220{\lambda }^3 + 48{\lambda }^4}{4
{\lambda }^2{\left( 32 + 13\lambda +
4{\lambda }^2 \right) }^2}\end{array}}&14\\\hline
6& {\begin{array}{l}
I_1 ,I_2 ,I_6 ,III \\#2\\#3\end{array}}&
{\begin{array}{c}
a= \frac{8 - 15\lambda + 4{\lambda }^2}
{2\lambda \left( 4 - 5\lambda +
{\lambda }^2 \right) },~b= \frac{-1 - 6\lambda + 3{\lambda }^2}
{16{\lambda }^2
\left( 4 - 5\lambda + {\lambda }^2 \right) }\\ \sigma=\frac{3\left( 20 - 33\lambda + 28{\lambda }^2 -
7{\lambda }^3 + {\lambda }^4 \right) }{4
{\lambda }^2{\left( 4 - 5\lambda +
{\lambda }^2 \right) }^2}\end{array}}&6\\\hline
7& {\begin{array}{l}
I_1 ,I_3 ,I_5 ,III \\#2\\#3\end{array}}&
{\begin{array}{c}
a= \frac{25 - 369\lambda - 60{\lambda }^2}
{50\lambda - 244{\lambda }^2 - 30{\lambda }^3},~b= \frac{-167 + 630\lambda + 225{\lambda }^2}
{16{\left( 1 - 5\lambda \right) }^2\lambda
\left( 25 + 3\lambda \right) }\\ \sigma=\frac{15\left( 125 - 675\lambda +
4244{\lambda }^2 + 501{\lambda }^3 +
45{\lambda }^4 \right) }{4
{\left( 1 - 5\lambda \right) }^2{\lambda }^2
{\left( 25 + 3\lambda \right) }^2}\end{array}}&6\\\hline
8& {\begin{array}{l}
I_2 ,I_3 ,I_4 ,III \\#2\\#3\end{array}}&
{\begin{array}{c}
a= \frac{1 + 3\lambda - 12{\lambda }^2}
{2\lambda + 4{\lambda }^2 - 6{\lambda }^3},~b= \frac{-1 - 9\lambda + 9{\lambda }^2}
{16{\left( -1 + \lambda \right) }^2
\left( \lambda + 3{\lambda }^2 \right) }\\ \sigma=\frac{3\left( 1 + 3\lambda + 13{\lambda }^2 -
6{\lambda }^3 + 9{\lambda }^4 \right) }{4
{\left( -1 + \lambda \right) }^2
{\left( \lambda + 3{\lambda }^2 \right) }^2}\end{array}}
&6\\\hline
9& {\begin{array}{l}
I_1 ,I_1 ,I_6 ,IV \\#2\\#3\end{array}}&
{\begin{array}{c}
a= \frac{1 - 2{\lambda }^2}{\lambda - {\lambda }^3},~b= \frac{4 + 27{\lambda }^2}
{144{\lambda }^2\left( -1 + {\lambda }^2 \right) }\\ \sigma=\frac{32 + 49{\lambda }^2 + 27{\lambda }^4}
{36{\lambda }^2
{\left( -1 + {\lambda }^2 \right) }^2}\end{array}}&6\\\hline
10& {\begin{array}{l}
I_1 ,I_2 ,I_5 ,IV \\#2\\#3\end{array}}&
{\begin{array}{c}
a= \frac{27 + 87\lambda + 16{\lambda }^2}
{27\lambda + 58{\lambda }^2 + 8{\lambda }^3},~b= \frac{-3 + 16\lambda + 6{\lambda }^2}
{4{\lambda }^2\left( 27 + 58\lambda +
8{\lambda }^2 \right) }\\ \sigma=\frac{648 + 1824\lambda + 3157{\lambda }^2 +
476{\lambda }^3 + 48{\lambda }^4}{{\lambda }^2
{\left( 27 + 58\lambda + 8{\lambda }^2 \right)
}^2}\end{array}}&10\\\hline
11& {\begin{array}{l}
I_3 ,I_3 ,I_2 ,IV \\#2\\#3\end{array}}&
{\begin{array}{c}
a= \frac{-1 + \lambda + 4{\lambda }^2}
{2\left( -\lambda + {\lambda }^3 \right) },~b= \frac{-13 - 22\lambda + 27{\lambda }^2}
{144{\left( -1 + \lambda \right) }^2
\left( \lambda + {\lambda }^2 \right) }\\ \sigma=\frac{27 + 5\lambda + 64{\lambda }^2 +
5{\lambda }^3 + 27{\lambda }^4}{36
{\lambda }^2{\left( -1 + {\lambda }^2 \right) }^2}\end{array}}&6
\end{array}$$
Schwarzian derivatives {#sec:schwartzian}
======================
Our goal in the rest of this work is to compare the differential equations that we obtained in the previous section to those obtained by Elkies in [@Elk98]. One essential problem is that the equation depends in an essential way on the choice of the section of the de Rham bundle. Even, as is the case for us, if the choice is between different sections of a line bundle, it still means that the periods could be multiplied by an arbitrary rational function. To compare two differential equations it is best to compare quantities which are invariant with respect to such scaling.
This can be done as follows for equations of degree 2. Consider the quotient of two independent solutions. This is invariant with respet to scaling. It depends of course on the choice of the two solutions, but only up to a fractional linear transformation. Applying the Schwarzian derivative, to be recalled next, removes this ambiguity. Our reference for this material is [@Elk98] (see also [@Iha74]).
The Schwarzian derivative of a function $z$ with respect to the parameter $\zeta$ is the function [@Elk98 (13)] $$S_\zeta(z) = \frac{2z' z''' - 3 (z'')^2}{(z')^2}$$ where derivatives are with respect to $\zeta$.
We recall the following relevant results
1. If $z_1$ is obtained from $z$ by a fractional linear transformation, then $ S_\zeta(z_1)= S_\zeta(z) $.
2. If $z$ is the quotient of a basis of solutions to the differential equation $y''+ay'+by=0$, derivative taken with respect to $\zeta$, then the Schwarzian derivative of $z$, which is independent of the choice of solutions by the first part, is given by [@Elk98 (17)] $$S_\zeta(z) = 4b - a^2-2 a'\;.$$
This gives our required invariant.
To describe the dependency of the parameter $\zeta$, it is better to consider the quadratic differential $$\sigma_\zeta(z) = S_\zeta(z) (d\zeta)^2$$ We have the formula [@Elk98 (14)] $$S_\eta(z) = \left(\frac{d\zeta}{d\eta}\right)^2 S_\zeta(z) + S_\eta(\zeta)$$ and thus $$\sigma_\eta(z) = \sigma_\zeta(z) + \sigma_\eta(\zeta)$$ so the quadratic differential $\sigma$ is not independent of the parameter, but has a simple transformation formula with respect to changing the variable. This will allow us, using the sigma invariant, to determine the change of variables that will take one equation to another.
To allow us to guess the required change of variables more easily, we further study the residue of the sigma invariant and how it behaves with respect to change of variables.
An honest quadratic differential $f(\zeta) (d\zeta)^2$ has a well defined residue which is the coefficient of $\zeta^{-2}$ in $f$. with a chance of variable $\zeta=\zeta(\eta)$ which has order $n$ the residue is multiplied by a factor of $n^2$.
Suppose now that $\zeta= \eta^n$. Then $$\begin{aligned}
S_\eta(\zeta)&= 2 \frac{n(n-1)(n-2)\eta^{n-3}}{n\eta^{n-1}} -
3\left(\frac{n(n-1)\eta^{n-2}}{n\eta^{n-1}}\right)^2\\
&= \eta^{-2} \left(2(n-1)(n-2)-3 (n-1)^2\right) \\
&= \eta^{-2}\left(2(n^2-3n+2)-3(n^2-2n+1)\right)\\
&= \eta^{-2} (1-n^2)\end{aligned}$$ It follows that if the coefficient of $\zeta^{-2}$ in $S_\zeta(z)$ is $\alpha$ then the coefficient of $\eta^{-2}$ in $S_\zeta(z)$ is $$n^2 \alpha + (1-n^2)= 1- n^2(1-\alpha)$$ This leads to the following.
The schwarzian residue of $\sigma=f(\zeta)(d\zeta)^2$, denoted ${\operatorname{res}}_S \sigma$, is $1-$ the coefficient of $\zeta^{-2}$ in $f(\zeta)$.
and we have
if $\zeta= \zeta(\eta)$ is a change of variables of degree $n$ then $${\operatorname{res}}_S \sigma_\eta(z)= n^2 {\operatorname{res}}_S \sigma_\zeta(z)$$
Note that at points where the differential is holomorphic the Schwarzian residue is $1$ and not $0$. In our examples, the local system pulls back to the Shimura local system ${\mathcal{S}h}$ over the upper half plane ${\mathcal{H}}$, where it is holomorphic. Thus, the Schwarzian residue is always $1/n^2$ for some $n$. We call this $n$ the *Schwarzian index* at the point. It is, of course, just the ellipticity index of the point.
In the following table we list for the examples we have the sigma invariant (with respect to the parameter $\lambda$, neglecting the $d\lambda^2$ term, and the Schwarzian indexes at points when it is bigger than $1$ (where the original fibration had a singular fiber).
$$\begin{array}{||l||l|l|l||}
1& {\begin{array}{l}
\gamma,\bar{\gamma},\infty,0\\#3\end{array}}&
{\frac{3\left( 945 - 652\lambda +
142{\lambda }^2 - 60{\lambda }^3 +
9{\lambda }^4 \right) }{4{\lambda }^2
{\left( 27 - 14\lambda + 3{\lambda }^2 \right)
}^2}}\\\hline
2& {\begin{array}{l}
\frac{-9}{4},\frac{-8}{9},\infty,0\\#3\end{array}}&
{\frac{20160 + 42008\lambda + 41331{\lambda }^2 +
17388{\lambda }^3 + 3888{\lambda }^4}{4
{\lambda }^2{\left( 72 + 113\lambda +
36{\lambda }^2 \right) }^2}}\\\hline
3& {\begin{array}{l}
-10,0,\infty,\frac{1}{8}\\#3\end{array}}&
{\frac{3\left( 25 - 210\lambda +
2179{\lambda }^2 + 216{\lambda }^3 +
16{\lambda }^4 \right) }{{\left( 1 -
8\lambda \right) }^2{\lambda }^2
{\left( 10 + \lambda \right) }^2}}\\\hline
4& {\begin{array}{l}
\frac{-5}{9},0,\infty,3\\#3\end{array}}&
{\frac{2025 + 4295\lambda + 9156{\lambda }^2 -
1809{\lambda }^3 + 729{\lambda }^4}{12
{\left( -3 + \lambda \right) }^2{\lambda }^2
{\left( 5 + 9\lambda \right) }^2}}\\\hline
5& {\begin{array}{l}
\delta,\bar{\delta},\infty,0\\#3\end{array}}&
{\frac{3840 + 2072\lambda + 43{\lambda }^2 +
220{\lambda }^3 + 48{\lambda }^4}{4
{\lambda }^2{\left( 32 + 13\lambda +
4{\lambda }^2 \right) }^2}}\\\hline
6& {\begin{array}{l}
4,1,\infty,0\\#3\end{array}}&
{\frac{3\left( 20 - 33\lambda + 28{\lambda }^2 -
7{\lambda }^3 + {\lambda }^4 \right) }{4
{\lambda }^2{\left( 4 - 5\lambda +
{\lambda }^2 \right) }^2}}\\\hline
7& {\begin{array}{l}
\frac{-25}{3},0,\infty,\frac{1}{5}\\#3\end{array}}&
{\frac{15\left( 125 - 675\lambda +
4244{\lambda }^2 + 501{\lambda }^3 +
45{\lambda }^4 \right) }{4
{\left( 1 - 5\lambda \right) }^2{\lambda }^2
{\left( 25 + 3\lambda \right) }^2}}\\\hline
8& {\begin{array}{l}
\frac{-1}{3} ,0,\infty,1\\#3\end{array}}&
{\frac{3\left( 1 + 3\lambda + 13{\lambda }^2 -
6{\lambda }^3 + 9{\lambda }^4 \right) }{4
{\left( -1 + \lambda \right) }^2
{\left( \lambda + 3{\lambda }^2 \right) }^2}}
\\\hline
9& {\begin{array}{l}
1,-1,\infty,0\\#3\end{array}}&
{\frac{32 + 49{\lambda }^2 + 27{\lambda }^4}
{36{\lambda }^2
{\left( -1 + {\lambda }^2 \right) }^2}}\\\hline
10& {\begin{array}{l}
\frac{-27}{4} ,\frac{-1}{2} ,\infty,0\\#3\end{array}}&
{\frac{648 + 1824\lambda + 3157{\lambda }^2 +
476{\lambda }^3 + 48{\lambda }^4}{{\lambda }^2
{\left( 27 + 58\lambda + 8{\lambda }^2 \right)
}^2}}\\\hline
11& {\begin{array}{l}
\infty,0,-1,1\\#3\end{array}}&
{\frac{27 + 5\lambda + 64{\lambda }^2 +
5{\lambda }^3 + 27{\lambda }^4}{36
{\lambda }^2{\left( -1 + {\lambda }^2 \right) }^2}}
\end{array}$$
The results of Elkies {#sec:elkies}
=====================
In [@Elk98] Elkies computes certain differential equations associated with Shimura curves. While this is not stated explicitly, these are exactly the Picard Fuchs equations associated with the Shimura local system descended to the Shimura curve because the quotient of the two solutions gives the coordinate $\tau$ on the upper half plane, just as for the Shimura local system, as in Section \[sec:generalities\].
The briefly list the types of Shimura curves considered. For more information one may consult [@Elk98] or [@Bes-Liv10] (our notation is consistent with the latter reference). For each discriminant $D$ (always the product of an even number of primes) the Shimura curve $V_D$ is the quotient of the upper half plane by the group $\Gamma$ of norm one elements in a maximal order in a quaternion algebra of discriminant $D$ (see the introduction). For each prime $p|D$ it carries a modular involution $w_p$ and these involutions commute with each other so that we can also set $w_n= \prod_{p|n} w_p$ for $n|D$. We let ${V_{D}^\ast}$ be the quotient of $V_D$ by the group generated by all its modular involutions. Finally, for a prime $p$ which does not divide $D$ there is a modular curve $V_{D,p}$, which corresponds to an additional “$\Gamma_0(p)$” structure, This retains all of the previous involutions but has an additional involution $w_p$.
In table \[elkies\] we give, for the relevant curves, the equation that Elkies finds, the associated sigma invariant and the Schwarzian indices at the relevant points. The equations of Elkies are in non-normalized form $ay''+by'+cy=0$, so one needs to normalize first before computing the sigma invariant.
$$\begin{array}{||l||l|l|l||}
{V_{10}^\ast}
&
{\begin{array}{c}
t (t - 2) (t - 27)y''+ \frac{10 t^2 - 203 t +
216}{6} y'+(\frac{7 t}{144} - \frac{7}{18})y=0\\ \sigma=\frac{10368 - 7296\,t + 3157\,t^2 - 119\,t^3 +
3\,t^4} {4\,{\left( -27 + t \right) }^2\,
{\left( -2 + t \right) }^2\,t^2}
\end{array}}
&
{\begin{array}{l}
27,2,\infty,0\\#3\end{array}}
\\\hline
{V_{14}^\ast}
&
{\begin{array}{c}
t (16 t^2 + 13 t + 8)y''+ (24 t^2 + 13 t + 4)y'+
(\frac{3}{4} t + \frac{3}{16}) y=0\\ \sigma=
\frac{192 + 440\,t + 43\,t^2 + 1036\,t^3 +
960\,t^4} {4\,t^2\,{\left( 8 + 13\,t + 16\,t^2
\right) }^2}
\end{array}}
&
{\begin{array}{l}
\delta_1,\bar{\delta}_1,0,\infty\\#3\end{array}}
\\\hline
{V_{15}^\ast}
&
{\begin{array}{c}
(t-81) (t-1) t y''+ (\frac{3 t^2}{2}-82 t+\frac{81}{2})y'+
(\frac{t}{18}-\frac{1}{2}) y=0\\ \sigma=
\frac{35 t^4-3680 t^3+244242 t^2-244944 t+177147}{36 (t-81)^2 (t-1)^2 t^2}
\end{array}}
&
{\begin{array}{l}
1,81,0,\infty\\#3\end{array}}
\\\hline
\end{array}$$
Here $\delta_1$ is a solution to the equation $16t^2+13t+8=0$.
For discriminant 6 Elkies does not write down the equation explicitely, though he gives a recepy to discover one of 4 possible equations. As he notes, however, since there are only 3 elliptic points, the sigma invariant is uniquely determined by the indexes of ellipticity. Suppose that these are at $t=0,1,\infty$. The most general form of $\sigma$ is $$\sigma =
\left(\frac{a}{t^2}+\frac{b}{(t-1)^2}+\frac{c}{t}+\frac{d}{t-1}\right) (dt)^2$$ and one has the condition $c+d=0$ to avoid a pole of order $3$ at $\infty$. The residues are $a,b$ and $a+b+d$ at $0$, $1$ and $\infty$ respectively, from which all the coefficients are easily determined. In the case at hand, Elkies chooses the coordinate $t$ so that the indices are $2,4,6$ at $0$, $1$ and $\infty$ respectively. This gives $$\sigma =
\left(\frac{3}{4t^2}+\frac{15}{16(t-1)^2}
+\frac{103}{144t}-\frac{103}{144(t-1)}\right)
(dt)^2$$
comparison with the results of elkies {#sec:comparison}
=====================================
In this section we compare Elkies’s list with the list of differential equations we obtained in Section \[sec:k3\]. As explained in the introduction, each of these examples is a family of varieties over ${\mathbb{P}}^1$ and there is a correspondence between these ${\mathbb{P}}^1$ and a Shimura curve of some (computable) discriminant.
The above correspondece is compatible with the Shimura local system ${\mathcal{S}h}$. This implies that the correspondence is going to map the sigma invariants on Elkies’s list to the corresponding sigma invariant of the families. Here we demonstrate how one can use this to guess the correct correspondence. This is not a proof that the correspondence is the correct one, which then needs to be established by more precise means [@Bes-Liv10 Section 8]. It can nevertheless be used to exclude certain possible correspondenced (see Subsection 8.2 in the above reference).
No. 10 - Corresponds to discriminant $10$. The correspondence has to carry the special points of the fibration at $\lambda=-27/4,-1/2,\infty,0 $ with respective Schwarzian indices $2,2,2,3$ to the special points $t=27,2,\infty,0 $ with the same respective indices for the equation that Elkies finds for $V_{10}/(w_5,w_2)$. It is trivial to guess the relation $t=-4\lambda$. A change of variables for the sigma invariants confirms this, It can be proved rigorously (see [@Bes-Liv10 Subsection 8.3]) that the $\lambda$-line is isomorphic to $V_{14}/(w_2,w_5)$
No. 5 - Corresponds to discriminant $14$. The correspondence has to carry the special points of the fibration at $\lambda= \delta,\bar{\delta},\infty,0 $ with respective Schwarzian indices $2,2,2,4$ to the special points $t=\delta_1,\bar{\delta}_1,0,\infty $ with the same respective indices for the equation that Elkies finds for $V_{14}/(w_7,w_2)$. Since $\delta$ is a solution of the equation $4x^2+13x+32=0$ it is easy to guess the relation $t=2/\lambda$. A change of variables for the sigma invariants confirms this. It can be proved rigorously (see [@Bes-Liv10 Subsection 8.1]) that the $\lambda$-line is indeed isomorphic to the Shimura curve $V_{14}/(w_2,w_7)$.
No. 3 - Corresponds to discriminant $15$. The correspondence has to carry the special points $t=1,81,0,\infty $ with respective Schwarzian indices $2,2,2,6$ for the equation that Elkies finds for $V_{15}/(w_5,w_3)$ to the special points of the fibration at $\lambda=-10,0,\infty,1/8$ with the same indices. This can be done with the change of variables $\lambda=\frac{t-81}{8t}$ and a change of variables for the sigma invariants confirms this. It can be proved rigorously (see [@Bes-Liv10 Lemma 3.8.2]).
No. 4 - Corresponds to discriminant $10$. In this case we speculated (but could not prove) that the $\lambda$-line was the curve $V_{10,3}/{\langle w_2,w_5,w_3 \rangle} $. Here we show this is consistent with the Picard-Fuchs equations. According to Elkies, the curve $V_{10,3}/{\langle w_2,w_5 \rangle} $ is a degree $4$ cover of ${V_{10}^\ast}$, rational with a coordinate $x$ such that $$t=\frac{{\left( -6 + 6\,x
\right) }^3} {{\left( 1 + x \right) }^2\, \left(
17 - 10\,x + 9\,x^2 \right) }$$ (this is equation (57) in [@Elk98] but the $7$ there should be corrected to $17$, as for example in the computation between equations (59) and (60)). From the expression $$\frac{6^3}{9\tau + 8} \text{ with } \tau= \frac{(3x^2+5)^2}{9(x-1)^3}$$ which is also in (57) there it is easy to see that the map $x\to t$ sends $1,\infty,-1, 5$ to $0,0,\infty,2$ with multiplicities $3,1,2, 2$ respectively, $\pm \sqrt{-5/3}$ to $27$ with multiplicity $2$, the two roots of $9x^2-10x+5=0$ to $2$ with multiplicity $1$, and the two roots of $9x^2-10x+17=0$ to $\infty$ with multiplicity $1$. Thus, the elliptic points for $V_{10,3}/{\langle w_2,w_5 \rangle} $ are going to be at $x=\infty$ with multiplicity $3$ and at the roots of the equations $9x^2-10x+5=0$ and $9x^2-10x+17=0$ with multiplicity $2$. The involution $w_3$ is given by Elkies, just after (57), to be $w_3(x)= \frac{10}{9}-x$ and so a coordinate on the quotient is given by $$\zeta= 9\left(x-\frac{5}{9}\right)^2 = 9x^2-10x+ \frac{25}{9}$$ We see that the elliptic points will map to $\zeta= \infty, -20/9, -128/9$, so these will be elliptic of degree $6,2,2$, and in addition the ramification point $0$ is elliptic of degree $2$. We can map $\zeta$ to $\lambda$ with the correct orders by $$\lambda = 3- \frac{128}{3\zeta + \frac{128}{3}} = 3-
\frac{128}{3(9x^2-10x+17)}\;.$$ This is confirmed by the matching of the sigma invariants.
Other examples correspond to discriminant $6$. Some of them are directly interrelated. Consider examples number 6 and 8. The special points are $\lambda_1=4,1,\infty,0$ and $\lambda_2=-1/3,0,\infty,1$ respectively with the same indices. There is a finite number of ways for carying one set to the other preserving the indices, and testing each one using the sigma invariants we get the correct transformation $\lambda_1= 1 -
1/\lambda_2$. It turns out that (see [@Bes-Liv10 Subsection 8.7]) that making this change of variable makes the two base elliptic fibrations isogenous.
Consider next examples 9 and 11. The special points in both cases are $\infty,0,-1,1$ but with indices $2,3,2,2$ in example 9 and $2,2,2,3$ in example 11. Testing again the finite number of possible transformations with the sigma invariants gives $\lambda_2=(1 + \lambda_1)/(1 - \lambda_1)$. It is proved in [@Bes-Liv10 Subsection 8.8] that this again makes the two base fibrations isogenous.
No. 6 - For $V_6/(w_2,w_3)$ it turns out to be slightly better to work with the coordinate $\zeta = 1/(1-t)$ so that the elliptic points are at $\zeta= 0$, $1$ and $\infty$ with indices $6$, $2$ and $4$ respectively. To get the required ellipticity behavior for the $\lambda$-line, with elliptic points at $\lambda=4,1,\infty,0$ with indices $2,2,2,4$, one may consider a degree 3 map having ramification type $(2,1)$ over $\infty$, producing indices $2$ and $4$, ramification $3$ above $0$, producing an additional index $2$ and ramification type $(1,2)$ above $1$, producing one additional index $2$ and an additional non-elliptic point. This can be aranged by a map of the form $\zeta = c\lambda^{-1} ((\lambda-1)^3$ for the appropriate $c$ for which this ramifies above $1$. So $c$ is the value for which one of the roots of the derivative $(c(\lambda-1)^3-\lambda)'=
3c(\lambda-1)^2-1 $ is mapped to $\zeta=1$. We have for that root $$1 = c\frac{(\lambda-1)^3}{\lambda} = \frac{\lambda-1}{3\lambda}$$ hence $\lambda = -1/2$ and $c=4/27$. Consider the equation for $\lambda$ to map to $\zeta=1$. As an equation on $\lambda-1$ the sum of the 3 roots should be $0$, hence the third root should be $3$, so that the additional preimage of $1$ is $4$. Thus, the cover we found matches perfectly with the $\lambda$-line. Summarizing, we have $$t= 1-\frac{1}{\zeta} = 1-\frac{27 \lambda}{4(\lambda-1)^3}$$ This is confirmed by the sigma invariants.
No. 9 - Here the elliptic points are at $1,-1,\infty$ and $0$ with indices $2,2,2$ and $3$. In trying to relate them with the elliptic points for $\zeta$ it is very easy to guess the relation $\zeta=\lambda^2$, and this is confirmed by the $\sigma$-invariants. Thus, the $\lambda$-line is a double cover of ${V_{6}^\ast}$ ramified above the elliptic points of order $4$ and $6$. This was used in [@Bes-Liv10 Subsection 8.2] to prove that the $\lambda$-line is $V_6/{\langle w_6 \rangle}$.
No. 7 - The elliptic points are $-25/3,0,\infty,1/5$ and with indices $2$ at the first $3$ points and $4$ at the last point. Here we guess that the base for the family of twists is isomorphic to the quotient $V_{6,5}/{\langle w_2,w_3,w_5 \rangle}$. Elkies find a coordinate $x$ on $V_{6,5}/{\langle w_2,w_3 \rangle}$ for which the action of $w_5$ is given by [@Elk98 (37)] $w_5(x)=(42 - 55 x)/(55 + 300 x)$. The two fixed points of this action are $7/30$ and $-3/5$. Thus, a coordinate on the quotient is provided by $$\label{dsix1}
y=((x + 3/5)/(x - 7/30))^2\;.$$ The map from $X_0^\ast(5)$ to $V_6/(w_2,w_3)$ is given by [@Elk98 Equation 36] by $$t=( 1 + 3x + 6x^2 )^2
( 1 - 6x + 15x^2)=1+27x^4 ( 5 + 12x + 20x^2 )\;.$$ The relation between $t$ and $\zeta$ is $$\label{dsix2}
\zeta= 1/(1-t)=\frac{-1}{27x^4 ( 5 + 12x +
20x^2)}\;.$$ The ramification above $\zeta=0$ is of order $6$ at infinity. The ramification over $\zeta=\infty$ is of order $4$ at $x=0$ and order $1$ at each of the roots of $5 + 12x + 20x^2$. The ramification over $\zeta=1$, or $t=0$, is of order $1$ at each of the roots of $1 - 6x + 15x^2$ and of order $2$ at each of the roots of $ 1 + 3x + 6x^2$. Thus the elliptic points of the cover are of order $4$ at the roots of $ 5 + 12x + 20x^2$ and of order $2$ at each of the roots of $1 - 6x + 15x^2$. These two pairs of points are interchanged by $w_5$. The elliptic points of order $4$ are mapped to $y=-9/16$ while those of order $2$ are mapped to $y=-24$. In addition we get elliptic points at the ramification points of the covering at $y=0$ and $y=\infty$, both of order $2$. Now, if we guessed correctly, there would be a Möbius transformation sending the 4 elliptic points to the 4 singular points of the elliptic surface, sending $y=-9/16$ to $\lambda=1/5$ . It is easy to check that the unique transformation of this type is $\lambda=-25 y/(3
(24+y))$. Composing with we get $$\lambda=\frac{-( 3 + 5x)^2}{5 ( 1 - 6x +
15x^2)}\;.$$ This, as usual, is confirmed by Pulling back the $\sigma$-invariants. Our guess can be proved rigorously [@Bes-Liv10 Subsection 8.6].
No. 2 - The elliptic points are at $-9/4,-8/9,\infty,0$ with indices $2,2,2,6$ respectively.
We try to guess that this family corresponds to $V_{6,7}/{\langle w_2,w_3,w_7 \rangle}$. Elkies write a coordinate $x$ on $V_{6,7}/{\langle w_2,w_3 \rangle}$ for which the action of $w_7$ is given by [@Elk98 (40)] $w_7(x)=(116 - 9 x)/(9
+ 20x)$. The two fixed points of this action are $-29/10$ and $2$. Thus, a coordinate on the quotient is provided by $$\label{dsix4}
y=\left(\frac{x + 29/10}{x - 2}\right)^2\;.$$ The map from $V_{6,7}/{\langle w_2,w_3 \rangle}$ to ${V_{6}^\ast}$ is given by [@Elk98 (39)] by $$t= \frac{- \left( 25 + 4\,x + 4\,x^2 \right) \,
{\left( 2 - 12\,x + 3\,x^2 - 2\,x^3 \right) }^2
}{108\,\left( 37 - 8\,x + 7\,x^2 \right) }=
1-\frac{(2 x^2 - x + 8)^4}{108 (7 x^2 - 8 x +
37)}\;.$$ This looks nicer with $\zeta$ $$\label{dsix5}
\zeta= 1/(1-t)=\frac{108\,\left( 37 - 8\,x +
7\,x^2 \right) }
{{\left( 8 - x + 2\,x^2 \right) }^4}\;.$$ The preimage of $\zeta=0$ is $6$ times $\infty$ plus the two roots of $7
x^2 - 8 x + 37$. The preimage of $\zeta=\infty$ is $4$ times each of the roots of $2 x^2 - x + 8$. The preimage of $\zeta=1$, or $t=0$, is 2 times each of the roots of $ 2 - 12x + 3x^2 - 2x^3$ plus each of the roots of $4x^2+4x+25$. Thus the elliptic points of $V_{6,7}/{\langle w_2,w_3 \rangle}$ are the two roots of $7 x^2 - 8 x + 37$ with index $6$ and the roots of $4x^2+4x+25$ with index $2$. two pairs of points are interchanged by $w_7$. The elliptic points of order $6$ are mapped to $y=-243/100$ while those of order $2$ are mapped to $y=-24/25$. In addition we get elliptic points at the ramification points of the covering at $y=0$ and $y=\infty$, both of order $2$. Now, if we guessed correctly, there would be a Möbius transformation sending the 4 elliptic points to the 4 singular points of the elliptic surface, sending $y=-243/100$ to $\lambda=0$ . It is easy to check that the unique transformation of this type is $$\lambda=\frac{486 + 200y}{-216 - 225y}\;.$$ Composing with we get $$\lambda=\frac{-8\,\left( 37 - 8\,x + 7\,x^2
\right) }
{9\,\left( 25 + 4\,x + 4\,x^2 \right) }\;.$$ This is confirmed by the $\sigma$-invariants. Our guess can be proved rigorously [@Bes-Liv10 Subsection 8.5].
Software {#sec:software}
========
All the relevant computations for this work can be downloaded from <http://www.math.bgu.ac.il/~bessera/picard-fuchs/>. They are in the form of a MATHEMATICA notebook. The notebook is self explanatory. It loads the following files:
- pf.m - main file containing all the algorithms
- data.m - file contains the equations for the elliptic fibrations on Herfurtner’s list
- elkiesdata.m - contains the differential equations obtained by Elkies.
The relevant functions contained in the file pf.m
- picfucs function - computes the Picard-Fuchs equation for an elliptic surface. This is just a translation into Mathematica of the Maple script by Beukers, which may be found at <http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~beuke106/picfuchs.maple>
- Twistpf function - computes the Picard-Fuchs equation for the family of twists given the equation for the original elliptic fibration.
- SigChVar function - makes a change of variable for the sigma invariant.
- DRes function - computes the residue of a quadratic differential.
[10]{}
W. P. Barth, K. Hulek, C. A. M. Peters, and A. Van de Ven. , volume 4 of [*Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics \[Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics\]*]{}. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, second edition, 2004.
A. Besser. cyles over [S]{}himura curves. , 4:659–693, 1995.
A. Besser and R. Livne. Universal [K]{}ummer families over [S]{}himura curves. Preprint, 2010.
C. H. Clemens. , volume 55 of [*Graduate Studies in Mathematics*]{}. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, second edition, 2003.
N. D. Elkies. Shimura curve computations. In [*Algorithmic number theory (Portland, OR, 1998)*]{}, pages 1–47. Springer, Berlin, 1998.
S. Herfurtner. Elliptic surfaces with four singular fibers. , 291:319–342, 1991.
Y. Ihara. Schwarzian equations. , 21:97–118, 1974.
K. Kedlaya. Counting points on hyperelliptic curves using [M]{}onsky-[W]{}ashnitzer cohomology. , 16(4):323–338, 2001.
K. Kodaira. On compact analytic surfaces:[II]{}. , 77:563–626, 1962.
C. Peters. Monodromy and [P]{}icard-[F]{}uchs equations for families of ${K}3$-surfaces and elliptic curves. , 19(4):583–607, 1986.
S. Zucker. Hodge theory with degenerating coefficients. [$L_{2}$]{} cohomology in the [P]{}oincaré metric. , 109(3):415–476, 1979.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
bibliography:
- 'Literature.bib'
---
=1
Introduction
============
Relativistic field theories of gauge symmetry type can be formulated as constrained Hamiltonian systems. Using a $ (1 + 3) $-decomposition of spacetime, the four dimensional field equations usually split into hyperbolic evolution equations and elliptic constraint equations for the Cauchy data. A remarkable observation is that the constraints often can be formulated in terms of the momentum map associated to the action of the symmetry group of the theory. This is usually verified by a fairly routine calculation in each example separately (see, , [@ArmsMarsdenEtAl1981; @Arms1981] for pure Yang–Mills theory and [@FischerMarsden1979; @ArmsFischerMarsden1975] for general relativity). Going beyond a case-by-case study, the general philosophy that the subset of the phase space cut out by the constraints can be identified with the zero set of a momentum map seems to be true in a large number of models. In this paper, we will argue that the relationship between constraints and momentum maps is not a lucky coincidence but is rooted in a special feature of the four dimensional physical action. This special feature is the main subject of the present paper.
Inspired by the Clebsch optimal control problem [@Gay-BalmazRatiu2011], we study a variational principle associated to a class of degenerate Lagrangians, whose degeneracy results from the action of the symmetry group. The defining feature of this principle is that the Lagrange multipliers are elements of the Lie algebra of the symmetry group and that they couple to the configuration variables via a given Lie algebra action. The resulting equations of motion, which we call the Clebsch–Euler–Lagrange equations, decompose into an evolution and a constraint equation. Next, we define a Clebsch–Legendre transformation similar to the ordinary Legendre transformation leading to what we call the Clebsch–Hamiltonian picture. As we will show, the constraints that arise from the degeneracy of the Lagrangian are phrased as momentum map constraints on the Hamiltonian side.
We then use the geometric formulation of the Dirac–Bergmann algorithm in the formulation of @GotayNesterHinds1978 to derive the Clebsch–Legendre transformation from an ordinary Legendre transformation of an extended Lagrangian system. In this process, we isolate two constraint equations, which are later given a geometric interpretation in terms of a symplectic reduction by stages procedure. This analysis of the constraints extends the well-known results for Yang–Mills theory [@BergveltDeKerf1986; @BergveltDeKerf1986a] and general relativity [@Giulini2015].
Since constraints which allow a reformulation in terms of symmetric Hamiltonian systems are abundant in field theories, this observation suggests that the Clebsch–Lagrange principle is fundamental for Cauchy problems. The two examples that will be discussed are the Yang–Mills–Higgs equations and the Einstein equation. In both cases, we will complete the following program:
1. Using a $ (1+3)$-splitting of spacetime, formulate the field equations as a Cauchy problem and determine the constraints on the initial data. In particular, find a symplectic manifold on which the dynamics takes place.
2. Identify the Lagrange multipliers as elements of the Lie algebra of the symmetry group and determine their action on the phase space.
3. Calculate the Lagrangian in the $ (1+3) $-splitting and show that it is of the Clebsch–Lagrange form.
4. Pass to the Clebsch–Hamiltonian picture using the Clebsch–Legendre transformation. In particular, phrase the constraints in terms of the momentum map.
5. Relate the Clebsch–Hamiltonian picture to the Hamiltonian system with constraints obtained by the ordinary Legendre transformation.
6. Discuss the symmetry reduction as a symplectic reduction by stages.
After accomplishing this program, we are left with a singular symplectic cotangent bundle reduction in infinite dimensions, which is studied in detail in a separate paper [@DiezRudolphReduction].
#### Acknowledgments {#acknowledgments .unnumbered}
We thank the anonymous reviewer for his/her comments and suggestions on an earlier draft, which significantly contributed to improving the quality of the paper. We gratefully acknowledge support of the Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences in Leipzig and of the University of Leipzig.
Clebsch–Lagrange variational principle {#sec:clebschLagrange}
======================================
In [@Gay-BalmazRatiu2011], @Gay-BalmazRatiu2011 study a class of optimal control problems associated to group actions. The special feature of the is that the control variables are Lie algebra valued and couple to the state variables via the symmetry group action. Let $ G $ be a Lie group that acts smoothly on the smooth manifold $ Q $ and let $ \LieA{g} $ be its Lie algebra. Given a smooth cost function $ l: Q \times \LieA{g} \to \R $, the Clebsch optimal control problem consists in finding curves $ t \mapsto q(t) $ and $ t \mapsto \xi(t) $ such that $$s[q, \xi] = \int_0^T l\bigl(q(t), \xi(t)\bigr) \dif t$$ is minimized subject to the optimal control constraint $ \dot q(t) = - \xi(t) \ldot q(t) $ and the endpoint constraints $ q(0) = q_i $ and $ q(T) = q_f $. Here, $ \xi \ldot q $ is the fundamental vector field at $ q \in Q $ generated by the action of $ \xi \in \LieA{g} $. The Pontryagin maximum principle shows that the control variable $ \xi $ satisfies the (generalized) Euler-Poincaré equation, see [@Gay-BalmazRatiu2011 Theorem 7.1]. This observation allows one to give an optimal control formulation for many systems including the heavy top and the compressible or magnetohydrodynamic fluid flow.
Clebsch–Lagrangian picture
--------------------------
We now describe a novel variational principle which draws its inspiration from the Clebsch optimal control problem and which will turn out to be useful for relativistic field theories with constraints. The idea is to dismiss the optimal control constraint and to treat, instead, the quantity $ \dot q(t) + \xi(t) \ldot q(t) $ as an effective velocity in the Lagrangian formulation. As above, let $ Q $ be a smooth manifold and let $ \TBundle Q $ be its tangent bundle. Assume that a Lie group $ G $ acts smoothly on $ Q $. The configuration space $ Q $ as well as the Lie group $ G $ are assumed to be (infinite-dimensional) Fréchet manifolds. We refer to [@Neeb2006; @Hamilton1982] for the differential calculus in Fréchet spaces. In order to stay close to physics notation, we will usually denote points in $ \TBundle Q $ by pairs $ (q, \dot{q}) $, where $ q \in Q $ stands for the base point of the vector $ \dot{q} \in \TBundle_q Q $. Sometimes, we will also write a point in $ \TBundle Q $ as a pair $ (q, v) $ with $ q \in Q $ and $ v \in \TBundle_q Q $. Moreover, we use the dot notation $ g \cdot q $ for the action of $ g \in G $ on $ q \in Q $. For the derivative of the action a similar notation using lower dots is employed, , the fundamental vector field $ \xi_* $ generated by $ \xi \in \LieA{g} $ is written as $ \xi_* (q) = \xi \ldot q \in \TBundle_q Q $ and the lifted $ G $-action on $ \TBundle Q $ has the form $ g \ldot X_q \in \TBundle_{g \cdot q} Q $ for $ X_q \in \TBundle_q Q $.
Given a smooth function $ L: \TBundle Q \times \LieA{g} \to \R $, we consider the variational principle $ \diF S = 0 $ for curves $ t \mapsto q(t) \in Q $ and $ t \mapsto \xi(t) \in \LieA{g} $, where the physical action $ S $ is of the form $$\label{eq:clebschLagrange:action}
S[q, \xi] = \int_0^T L\bigl(q(t), \dot q(t) + \xi(t) \ldot q(t), \xi(t) \bigr) \dif t$$ and where the variations of $t \mapsto q(t) $ are restricted to vanish at the endpoints. Here, $t \mapsto (q (t), \dot q (t) + \xi(t) \ldot q (t)) $ is viewed as a curve in $ \TBundle Q $. We will refer to this variational principle as the and to $ L $ as the .
In order to derive the associated equations of motions, we first recall some notions and results from geometric mechanics (see, [@AbrahamMarsdenEtAl1980; @RudolphSchmidt2012]). In particular, we need the theory of linear connections in vector bundles. A linear connection in a vector bundle $ \pi: E \to M $ is a vector bundle homomorphism $ K: \TBundle E \to E $ over $ \pi: E \to M $ and over $ \TBundle M \to M $ such that the following digram commutes:
E & E\
E \_M E & E,
where the vertical tangent bundle $ \VBundle E = \ker \tangent \pi $ is identified with $ E \times_M E $ via the linear structure on $ E $, that is, $$\mathrm{vl}: E \times_M E \to \VBundle E, \quad (e, v) \mapsto \difFracAt{}{\varepsilon}{0} (e + \varepsilon v) \in \VBundle_e E.$$ The kernel $ \HBundle E \equiv \ker K $ of $ K $ is then a vector subbundle of $ \TBundle E $ such that $ \TBundle E = \HBundle E \oplus \VBundle E $ is a fiberwise topological isomorphism. Accordingly, the connection $ K $ yields a bundle isomorphism $$\label{eq:connection:decomposition}
\TBundle E \to E \times_M \TBundle M \times_M E, \quad (Z_e) \mapsto \bigl(e, \tangent_e \pi(Z_e), K(Z_e)\bigr).$$ The inverse is given by $$\label{eq:connection:decompositionInverse}
E \times_M \TBundle M \times_M E \to \TBundle E, \quad (e, X, v) \mapsto \mathrm{vl}(e, v) + X^K_e,$$ where $ X^K_e $ denotes the $ K $-horizontal lift of $ X $ to $ \TBundle_e E $. Given a smooth section $ \phi $ of $ E $, its covariant derivative $ \nabla \phi $ is defined by $$\label{eq:connection:covDeriv}
\nabla_X \phi = K \bigl(\tangent \phi (X)\bigr)$$ for every $ X \in \VectorFieldSpace(M) $. Using the Leibniz rule, $ \nabla $ is extended to the exterior covariant derivative $ \dif_K: \DiffFormSpace^k(M, E) \to \DiffFormSpace^{k+1}(M, E) $ of $ E $-valued differential forms. A soldering form on $ E $ is a vector bundle morphism $ \vartheta: \TBundle M \to E $ (usually, $ \vartheta $ is required to be an isomorphism of vector bundles, but we do not need this assumption). The tangent bundle $ E = \TBundle M $ comes equipped with a tautological soldering form given by the identity $ \vartheta: \TBundle M \to \TBundle M $. Given a soldering form $ \vartheta \in \DiffFormSpace^1(M, E) $, the torsion of a connection $ K $ on $ E $ relative to $ \vartheta $ is defined to be $ T = \dif_K \vartheta \in \DiffFormSpace^2(M, E) $. In particular, we have $$T (X, Y)
= \dif_K \vartheta (X, Y)
= \nabla_X \bigl(\vartheta (Y)\bigr) - \nabla_Y \bigl(\vartheta (X)\bigr) - \vartheta (\commutator{X}{Y}),$$ which, for the tangent bundle $ E = \TBundle M $ with the tautological soldering form, reduces to the usual defining relation for the torsion. Let $ f: N \to M $ be a smooth map, and let $ E \to M $ be a vector bundle endowed with a connection $ K $. The pull-back bundle $ f^* E $ is a smooth vector bundle over $ N $. The connection on $ E $ yields via pull-back a connection in $ f^* E $ and thus induces a covariant derivative $$\nabla^f_Y: \sSectionSpace(f^* E) \to \sSectionSpace(f^* E),
\quad \psi \mapsto K\bigl(\tangent \psi (Y)\bigr)$$ for every $ Y \in \VectorFieldSpace(N) $. In particular, for a curve $ \gamma: \R \supseteq I \to M $, we write $$\label{eq:connection:alongCurve}
\DifFrac{}{t} \equiv \nabla^\gamma_{\difp_t}: \sSectionSpace(\gamma^* E) \to \sSectionSpace(\gamma^* E)$$ for the covariant derivative along $ \gamma $ in the direction of the canonical vector field $ \difp_t $ on $ I $.
Returning to our original setting, let $ Q $ be a smooth manifold and let $ L: \TBundle Q \to \R $ be a smooth Lagrangian. The $ \difFibre L: \TBundle Q \to \TBundle' Q $ of $ L $ is defined by $$\label{FibDer}
\dualPair{\difFibre L (v)}{w} = \difFracAt{}{\varepsilon}{0} L(v + \varepsilon w)\, ,$$ where $ v, w \in \TBundle_q Q $, and $ \TBundle' Q $ denotes the fiberwise dual of the tangent bundle. In order to stay close to the usual physics notation, the fiber derivative $ \difFibre L: \TBundle Q \to \TBundle' Q $ will be written as $ \difpFrac{L}{\dot q} $. We stress that the latter symbol will always stand for the mapping given by , $$\dualPair*{\difpFrac{L}{\dot{q}}(q, v)}{w}
= \difFracAt{}{\varepsilon}{0} L(q, v + \varepsilon w) \,,
\qquad w \in \TBundle_q Q.$$ In order to define the partial derivative $ \difpFrac{L}{q} $ in an intrinsic way, we need a linear connection in $ \TBundle Q $. By , every connection $ K: \TBundle (\TBundle Q) \to \TBundle Q $ in the bundle $ \TBundle Q \to Q $ yields a vector bundle isomorphism $$\label{eq:clebschLagrange:decompositionTTwo}
\TBundle (\TBundle Q) \isomorph \TBundle Q \times_Q \TBundle Q \times_Q \TBundle Q.$$ Accordingly, we will write elements of $ \TBundle (\TBundle Q) $ as tuples $ (q, \dot{q}, \diF q, \diF \dot{q}) $, where $ \dot{q}, \diF q $ and $ \diF \dot{q} $ are elements of $ \TBundle_q Q $. We emphasize that the isomorphism and, in particular, the component $ \diF \dot{q} $ depend on the connection $ K $. Now, for $ L: \TBundle Q \to \R $, the derivative of $ L $ at $ (q, \dot{q}) \in \TBundle Q $ with respect to the second component in the decomposition will be written as $ \difpFrac{L}{q}(q, \dot{q}): \TBundle Q \to \R $. In contrast to the fiber derivative $ \difpFrac{L}{\dot{q}} $, the partial derivative $ \difpFrac{L}{q} $ depends on the choice of a connection in $ \TBundle Q $. In summary, we express $ \tangent L: \TBundle (\TBundle Q) \to \R $ as $$\label{eq:clebschLagrange:tangentLagrange}
\tangent L(q, \dot{q}, \diF q, \diF \dot{q}) = \dualPair*{\difpFrac{L}{q}(q, \dot{q})}{\diF q} + \dualPair*{\difpFrac{L}{\dot{q}}(q, \dot{q})}{\diF \dot{q}}.$$ This relation is the intrinsic geometric version of the corresponding coordinate expression found in the physics literature. For $ L: \TBundle Q \times \LieA{g} \to \R $, the derivative of $ L $ at $ (q, \dot q, \xi) \in \TBundle Q \times \LieA{g} $ in the $ \LieA{g} $-direction yields an element of the topological dual $ \LieA{g}' $ and will be denoted by $ \difpFrac{L}{\xi}(q, \dot q, \xi) $.
In infinite dimensions, one needs to be careful with the notion of a cotangent bundle, because the canonical candidate — the fiberwise topological dual $ \TBundle' Q $ of the tangent bundle — fails to be a *smooth* bundle. Following [@DiezRudolphReduction], we define the cotangent bundle $ \CotBundle Q $ to be some smooth vector bundle[^1] over $ Q $ which is fiberwise in duality with the tangent bundle relative to some chosen pairing $ \dualPairDot: \CotBundle Q \times \TBundle Q \to \R $. In line with our notation for points of $ \TBundle Q $, we will denote points in the cotangent bundle $ \CotBundle Q $ by pairs $ (q, p) $ with $ q \in Q $ and $ p \in \CotBundle_{q} Q $. The dual pairing yields an embedding of the cotangent bundle $ \CotBundle Q $ into the topological dual $ \TBundle' Q $ of the tangent bundle. In the following, we always assume that all occurring dual objects can be represented by points of the cotangent bundle $ \CotBundle Q $. In particular, the derivatives $ \difpFrac{L}{q} $ and $ \difpFrac{L}{\dot{q}} $ are viewed as maps $ \TBundle Q \to \CotBundle Q $ (and not merely to $ \TBundle' Q $). Regularity of $ L $ then means that $ \difpFrac{L}{\dot{q}} $ is a diffeomorphism between $ \TBundle Q $ and $ \CotBundle Q $. Similarly as for the cotangent bundle, we choose a non-degenerate pairing $ \kappa: \LieA{g}^* \times \LieA{g} \to \R $. This gives an embedding of $ \LieA{g}^* $ into the topological dual $ \LieA{g}' $. We silently assume that all occurring dual objects that a priori are only in $ \LieA{g}' $ may actually be represented by elements of $ \LieA{g}^* $. This remark applies in particular to the partial derivative $ \difpFrac{L}{\xi} $.
In order to formulate the variational principle, we also need the following technical tool. A on $ Q $ is a smooth map $ \eta: \TBundle Q \supseteq U \to Q $ defined on an open neighborhood $ U $ of the zero section in $ \TBundle Q $ such that the composition of $ \eta $ with the zero section is the identity on $ Q $, , $ \eta(q, 0) = q $, and the map $ \pr_Q \times \eta: \TBundle Q \supseteq U \to Q \times Q $ is a diffeomorphism onto an open neighborhood of the diagonal, [@KrieglMichor1997 Section 42.4]. A local addition may be constructed using the exponential map of a Riemannian metric on $ Q $ but it also exists if $ Q $ is an affine space, a Lie group or a space of sections of a fiber bundle.
With these preliminaries out of the way, we are now able to state the equations of motion corresponding to the Clebsch–Lagrange variational principle.
\[prop:clebschLagrange:clebschEulerLagrangeDirect\] Let $ Q $ be a smooth Fréchet $ G $-manifold. Assume that $ Q $ can be endowed with a local addition[^2]. Moreover, assume that $ \TBundle Q $ and $ \CotBundle Q $ are endowed with dual torsion-free linear connections. Then, for a Clebsch–Lagrangian $ L: \TBundle Q \times \LieA{g} \to \R $ the following are equivalent:
The curves $ t \mapsto q(t) \in Q $ and $ t \mapsto \xi(t) \in \LieA{g} $ are solutions of the variational Clebsch–Lagrange problem .
The following equations hold:
\[eq:clebschLagrange:clebschEulerLagrangeDirect\]
( ) - - &= 0, \[eq:clebschLagrange:clebschEulerLagrangeDirect:evol\]\
+ (, ) &= 0, \[eq:clebschLagrange:clebschEulerLagrangeDirect:constraint\]
for all $ \zeta \in \LieA{g} $, where evaluation of all derivatives at $ (q, \dot q + \xi \ldot q, \xi) \in \TBundle Q \times \LieA{g} $ is understood. Furthermore, the second term in denotes the functional $ T_q Q \ni X \mapsto \dualPair[\big]{\difpFrac{L}{\dot{q}}}{\nabla_X \xi_*} \in \R $ viewed as an element of $ \CotBundle Q $.
The equations will be referred to as the .
Let $ I = [0, T] $ with $ T > 0 $. Since $ Q $ admits a local addition, the space $ \sFunctionSpace_{q_i q_f}(I, Q) $ of paths in $ Q $ with given endpoints $ q_i $ and $ q_f $ is a smooth infinite-dimensional manifold, [@Wockel2014 Theorem 7.6]. Similarly, as $ \LieA{g} $ is an affine space, the space $ \sFunctionSpace(I, \LieA{g}) $ of paths in $ \LieA{g} $ is a smooth manifold, too. Since the Lagrangian is smooth, the action $ S $ is a smooth function on $ \sFunctionSpace_{q_i q_f}(I, Q) \times \sFunctionSpace(I, \LieA{g}) $. The variational principle amounts to looking for extrema of $ S $.
Let $ \bigl(q_\varepsilon(t), \dot{q}_\varepsilon(t)\bigr) $ be a smooth perturbation of the curve $ \bigl(q(t), \dot{q}(t)\bigr) $ in $ \TBundle Q $. In line with usual notation, we write $$\label{eq:clebschLagrange:clebschEulerLagrangeDirect:variation}
\difFracAt{}{\varepsilon}{0}\bigl(q_\varepsilon(t), \dot{q}_\varepsilon(t)\bigr) \equiv \bigl(\diF q(t), \diF \dot{q}(t)\bigr) \in \TBundle_{q(t)} Q \times \TBundle_{q(t)} Q$$ for the corresponding curve in $ \TBundle(\TBundle Q) $ under the isomorphism . The curve $ t \mapsto \bigl(\diF q(t), \diF \dot{q}(t)\bigr) $ should be considered as a tangent vector field along the curve $ t \mapsto q(t) $, which may be viewed as an tangent vector to $ \sFunctionSpace_{q_i q_f}(I, Q) $ at that curve. Let $ \phi: I \times \R \to Q $ be defined by $ \phi(t, \varepsilon) = q_\varepsilon(t) $, and let $ \vartheta $ be the tautological soldering form on $ \TBundle Q $. Note that $ (\phi^* \vartheta)_{t, \varepsilon} (\difp_t) = \dot{q}_\varepsilon (t) $ and $ (\phi^* \vartheta)_{t, \varepsilon} (\difp_\varepsilon) = \diF q_\varepsilon (t) $. Since the connection $ K $ on $ \TBundle Q $ is torsion-free with respect to $ \vartheta $, using and , we obtain $$\begin{split}
0 &= \phi^* T (\difp_t, \difp_\varepsilon)
\\
&= \dif_{\phi^* K} (\phi^* \vartheta) (\difp_t, \difp_\varepsilon)
\\
&= \nabla^\phi_{\difp_t} \bigl(\phi^* \vartheta (\difp_\varepsilon)\bigr) - \nabla^\phi_{\difp_\varepsilon} \bigl(\phi^* \vartheta (\difp_t)\bigr) - \phi^* \vartheta \bigl(\commutator{\difp_t}{\difp_\varepsilon}\bigr)
\\
&= \DifFrac{}{t} (\diF q) - \diF \dot{q}(t).
\end{split}$$ That is, $ \diF \dot{q}(t) = \DifFrac{}{t} (\diF q) $. Moreover, by , we have $$K \left(\difFracAt{}{\varepsilon}{0} \xi \ldot q_\varepsilon\right)
= K \bigl(\tangent \xi_* (\diF q)\bigr)
= \nabla_{\diF q} \xi_*,$$ where $ \xi_* $ is viewed as a section $ Q \to \TBundle Q $ and where we suppressed the explicit time dependence. In passing, we note that $ \tangent \xi_* (\diF q) $ is the fundamental vector field at $ \diF q $ on $ \TBundle Q $ generated by $ \xi $. Thus, under the isomorphism , we obtain $$\begin{split}
\difFracAt{}{\varepsilon}{0}\bigl(q_\varepsilon(t), \dot{q}_\varepsilon(t) + \xi(t) \ldot q_\varepsilon(t)\bigr)
&= \Bigl(\diF q(t), \diF \dot{q}(t) + \nabla_{\diF q (t)} \xi(t)_* \Bigr)
\\
&= \left(\diF q(t), \DifFrac{}{t} (\diF q) + \nabla_{\diF q (t)} \xi(t)_* \right).
\end{split}$$ Thus, using , variation of the path in $ Q $ yields $$\begin{aligned}
&\int_0^T \left( \dualPair*{\difpFrac{L}{q}}{\diF q} + \dualPair*{\difpFrac{L}{\dot{q}}}{\DifFrac{}{t} (\diF q)} + \dualPair*{\difpFrac{L}{\dot{q}}}{\nabla_{\diF q} \xi_*} \right) \dif t = 0,
\label{eq:clebschLagrange:proof:geom}
\intertext{which after integration by parts on the second term is equivalent to}
& \int_0^T \left(\dualPair*{\difpFrac{L}{q}}{\diF q} - \dualPair*{\DifFrac{}{t} \left(\difpFrac{L}{\dot{q}}\right)}{\diF q} + \dualPair*{\difpFrac{L}{\dot{q}}}{\nabla_{\diF q} \xi_*} \right) \dif t = 0.
\end{aligned}$$ Since the variations $ \diF q $ are arbitrary, we get the evolution equation .
Similarly, let $ t \mapsto \diF \xi(t) \in \LieA{g} $ be a tangent vector to $ t \mapsto \xi(t) $ in $ \sFunctionSpace(I, \LieA{g}) $. Variation of $ \xi $ yields $$\begin{aligned}
\dualPair*{\difpFrac{L}{\dot{q}}}{\diF \xi \ldot q} + \kappa\left(\difpFrac{L}{\xi}, \diF \xi\right) = 0,
\end{aligned}$$ which clearly gives .
\[rem:clebschLagrange:optimalControl\] Suppose the Clebsch–Lagrange problem is supplemented by the optimal control constraint $ \dot q = - \xi \ldot q $. Then, reduces to the variational principle $ \diF s = 0 $ for the action $$s[q, \xi] = \int_0^T l(q, \xi) \dif t,$$ where the effective Lagrangian is given by $ l(q, \xi) = L(q, 0, \xi) $. We hence recover the Clebsch optimal control problem discussed at the beginning of the section.
For the applications we have in mind, the optimal control constraint is a too strong condition. In the context of Yang–Mills theory, it amounts to requiring that the color-electromagnetic field vanishes and, for Einstein’s equation, it is equivalent to a zero extrinsic curvature.
Clebsch–Hamilton picture {#MomMapCon}
------------------------
In this section, we discuss the Hamiltonian counterpart of the Clebsch–Euler–Lagrange equations. Let $ E: \TBundle Q \times \LieA{g} \to \R $, $$E(q, \dot{q}, \xi) \defeq \dualPair*{\difpFrac{L}{\dot{q}}(q, \dot{q} + \xi \ldot q, \xi)}{\dot{q} + \xi \ldot q} - L(q, \dot{q} + \xi \ldot q, \xi),$$ be the energy function associated to the Clebsch–Lagrangian $ L $. The is defined by $$\label{eq:clebschLagrange:clebschLegendre}
\mathrm{CL}: \TBundle Q \times \LieA{g} \to \CotBundle Q \times \LieA{g},
\quad
(q, \dot{q}, \xi) \mapsto \left(q, \difpFrac{L}{\dot{q}}(q, \dot{q} + \xi \ldot q, \xi), \xi \right).$$ We say that $ L $ is regular if $ \mathrm{CL} $ is a diffeomorphism. For a regular Clebsch–Lagrangian $ L $, the associated $ H: \CotBundle Q \times \LieA{g} \to \R $ is defined by $ H = E \circ \mathrm{CL}^{-1} $.
Clearly $ \mathrm{CL} $ is a diffeomorphism if and only if the fiber derivative $$\TBundle Q \to \CotBundle Q,
\quad
(q, v) \mapsto \left(q, \difpFrac{L}{\dot{q}}(q, v, \xi)\right)$$ is a diffeomorphism for every $ \xi \in \LieA{g} $. Moreover, the Clebsch–Hamiltonian $ H $ coincides with the Hamiltonian corresponding to the Clebsch–Lagrangian $ L $ via the ordinary Legendre transformation with $ \xi $ viewed as a parameter, that is, $$\label{eq:hamiltonian}
H \left(q, p , \xi \right) = \dualPair*{p}{v} - L(q, v, \xi)\, ,$$ where the relation $ p = \difpFrac{L}{\dot{q}}(q, v, \xi) $ defines $ v $ as a function of $ q, p $ and $ \xi $.
Let $ K $ be a torsion-free connection in $ \TBundle Q $ and let $ \bar{K} $ be the dual connection in $ \CotBundle Q $. By , $ \bar{K} $ induces a decomposition $$\label{eq:clebschLagrange:hamilton:decompCotBundle}
\TBundle (\CotBundle Q) \isomorph \CotBundle Q \times_Q \TBundle Q \times_Q \CotBundle Q$$ and we will write points in $ \TBundle (\CotBundle Q) $ as tuples $ (q, p, \delta q, \delta p) $ with $ p, \delta p \in \CotBundle_q Q $ and $ \delta q \in \TBundle_q Q $. Note that the component $ \delta p $ depends on the choice of the connection $ \bar{K} $. Given a smooth function $ H: \CotBundle Q \times \LieA{g} \to \R $ (not necessarily obtained via a Clebsch–Legendre transformation), we decompose the derivative $ \tangent H: \TBundle(\CotBundle Q) \to \R $ relative to as follows: $$\label{eq:clebschLagrange:hamilton:decompTHamilton}
\tangent H (q, p, \delta q, \delta p)
= \dualPair*{\difpFrac{H}{q}(q, p)}{\delta q} + \dualPair*{\delta p}{\difpFrac{H}{p}(q, p)},$$ where we assume that the partial derivatives are maps $ \difpFrac{H}{q}: \CotBundle Q \to \CotBundle Q $ and $ \difpFrac{H}{p}: \CotBundle Q \to \TBundle Q $. We emphasize that, according to , $ \difpFrac{H}{p} $ is the intrinsically defined fiber derivative of $ H $ while $ \difpFrac{H}{q} $ depends on the choice of the connection $ \bar{K} $.
\[prop:clebschLagrange:legendreDirect\] For a regular Clebsch–Lagrangian $ L: \TBundle Q \times \LieA{g} \to \R $ with associated Clebsch–Hamiltonian $ H: \CotBundle Q \times \LieA{g} \to \R $, the curves $ t \mapsto q(t) \in Q $ and $ t \mapsto \xi(t) \in \LieA{g} $ are solutions of the Clebsch–Lagrange variational problem if and only if the curves $$t \mapsto (q(t), p(t), \xi(t)) = \mathrm{CL}\bigl(q(t), \dot{q}(t), \xi(t)\bigr)$$ satisfy the following equations
\[eq:clebschLagrange:hamiltonianDirect\]
\[eq:clebschLagrange:hamiltonianDirect:hamiltonian\] (q, p, ) = - p - |[K]{}(p), (q, p, ) = q + q,\
\[eq:clebschLagrange:hamiltonianDirect:constraint\] = ((q, p, ), ),
for all $ \zeta \in \LieA{g} $.
The proof is by direct inspection. Let the curve $ t \mapsto p(t) $ be defined by $ p(t) \defeq \difpFrac{L}{\dot{q}} \bigl(q, \dot q + \xi \ldot q, \xi \bigr)(t) $. Using the Clebsch–Euler–Lagrange equation , we have $$\label{eq:clebschLagrange:hamiltonian:proof:pTime}
\DifFrac{}{t} p = \dualPair{p}{\nabla \xi_*} + \difpFrac{L}{q}(q, \dot q + \xi \ldot q, \xi).$$ On the other hand, using the identification of $ H $ as the Legendre transform of $ L $ with $ v = \dot q + \xi \ldot q $, we get $$\difpFrac{H}{q}(q, p, \xi)
= \dualPair*{p}{\difpFrac{v}{q}} - \dualPair*{\difpFrac{L}{\dot q}}{\difpFrac{v}{q}} - \difpFrac{L}{q}(q, v, \xi)
= - \difpFrac{L}{q}(q, \dot q + \xi \ldot q, \xi).$$ Comparing with , we see that is equivalent to $$\difpFrac{H}{q}(q, p, \xi) = - \DifFrac{}{t} p + \dualPair{p}{\nabla \xi_*}.$$ Let us rewrite the last term on the right-hand side of this equation. For $ \xi \in \LieA{g} $, choose a curve $ \varepsilon \mapsto g_\varepsilon $ in $ G $ with $ g_0 = e $ and $ \difFracAt{}{\varepsilon}{0} g_\varepsilon = \xi $. Let $ \Upsilon: \R \to Q $, $ \Upsilon(\varepsilon) = g_\varepsilon \cdot q $ be the orbit curve through $ q \in Q $. Considering $ \varepsilon \mapsto g_\varepsilon \ldot \dot{q} $ as a section of $ \Upsilon^* \TBundle Q $ for $ \dot{q} \in \TBundle_q Q $, we have $$\nabla_{\difp_\varepsilon}^\Upsilon (g_\varepsilon \ldot \dot{q})|_{\varepsilon = 0}
= K \left(\difFracAt{}{\varepsilon}{0} g_\varepsilon \ldot \dot{q}\right)
= K (\xi \ldot \dot{q})
= K \bigl(\tangent \xi_* (\dot{q})\bigr)
= \nabla_{\dot{q}} \xi_* \, .$$ A similar calculation yields $ \bar{\nabla}_{\difp_\varepsilon}^\Upsilon (g_\varepsilon \ldot p)|_{\varepsilon = 0} = \bar{K}(\xi \ldot p) $ for $ p \in \CotBundle_q Q $. Thus, taking the derivative of the identity $ \dualPair{p}{\dot{q}} = \dualPair{g_\varepsilon \cdot p}{g_\varepsilon \ldot \dot{q}} $ with respect to $ \varepsilon $ gives $$\label{eq:clebschLagrange:hamiltonian:proof:nablaXi}\begin{split}
0
&= \difFracAt{}{\varepsilon}{0} \dualPair{g_\varepsilon \cdot p}{g_\varepsilon \ldot \dot{q}}
\\
&= \dualPair*{p}{\nabla_{\difp_\varepsilon}^\Upsilon (g_\varepsilon \ldot \dot{q})|_{\varepsilon = 0}} + \dualPair*{\bar{\nabla}_{\difp_\varepsilon}^\Upsilon (g_\varepsilon \ldot p)|_{\varepsilon = 0}}{\dot{q}}
\\
&= \dualPair{p}{\nabla_{\dot{q}} \xi_*} + \dualPair{\bar{K}(\xi \ldot p)}{\dot{q}}.
\end{split}$$ That is $ \dualPair{p}{\nabla \xi_*} = - \bar{K}(\xi \ldot p) $. Hence, in summary, the first equation in is equivalent to .
Moreover, implies $$\difpFrac{H}{p}(q, p, \xi)
= v + \dualPair*{p}{\difpFrac{v}{p}} - \dualPair*{\difpFrac{L}{\dot q}(q, v, \xi)}{\difpFrac{v}{p}}
= \dot q + \xi \ldot q,$$ which yields the second equation in .
Similarly, the derivative of $ H $ in the $ \xi $-direction is given by $$\begin{split}
\difpFrac{H}{\xi}(q, p, \xi)
&= \dualPair*{p}{\difpFrac{v}{\xi}} - \dualPair*{\difpFrac{L}{\dot q}(q, v, \xi)}{\difpFrac{v}{\xi}} - \difpFrac{L}{\xi}(q, v, \xi)
\\
&= - \difpFrac{L}{\xi}(q, \dot q + \xi \ldot q, \xi).
\end{split}$$ Hence, the constraint is equivalent to .
In the proof of \[prop:clebschLagrange:legendreDirect\], we have seen that the first equation in is equivalent to
(q, p, ) = - p + .
The constraint equation has a natural reformulation in terms of the momentum map of the lifted $ G $-action on the cotangent bundle $ \CotBundle Q $. As usual, $ \CotBundle Q $ carries a canonical $ 1 $-form $ \theta $ defined by $$\label{CanForm}
\theta_{(q,p)} (X) = \dualPair{p}{\tangent_{(q,p)} \pi (X)}_q,$$ where $ X \in \TBundle_{(q,p)} (\CotBundle Q) $ and $ \pi $ is the natural projection of $ \CotBundle Q $. Correspondingly, the canonical symplectic form is $ \omega = \dif \theta $. Recall the $ G $-action on $ \TBundle Q $ written as $ g \ldot \dot{q} \in \TBundle_{g \cdot q} Q $ for $ g \in G $ and $ \dot{q} \in \TBundle_q Q $. We assume that the relation $$\dualPair{g \cdot p}{\dot{q}}
= \dualPair{p}{g^{-1} \ldot \dot{q}}$$ for $ g \in G, \dot{q} \in \TBundle_q Q $ and $ p \in \CotBundle_q Q $, defines a lift to $ \CotBundle Q $ of the $ G $-action on $ Q $ (which is automatic in finite dimensions). The lifted action on $ \CotBundle Q $ is symplectic, and the associated $ G $-equivariant momentum map $ J: \CotBundle Q \to \LieA{g}^* $ (if it exists) is defined by $$\label{eq:cotangentBundle:momentumMapDef}
\kappa\left(J(q, p), \xi\right)
= \dualPair{p}{\xi \ldot q}.$$ In infinite dimensions, the momentum map may not exist in pathological cases, [@DiezRudolphReduction Example 2.2], and we thus have to assume its existence in the forthcoming. The right-hand side of is exactly what occurs in the constraint and we hence arrive at the following reformulation of the Clebsch–Euler–Lagrange equations .
\[prop:clebschLagrange:legendre\] In the setting of \[prop:clebschLagrange:legendreDirect\], assume additionally that the lifted $ G $-action on the cotangent bundle $ \CotBundle Q $ has a momentum map $ J: \CotBundle Q \to \LieA{g}^* $ (which is automatic in finite dimensions). Then, the Clebsch–Euler–Lagrange equations are equivalent to the following set of equations:
\[eq:clebschLagrange:hamiltonian\]
\[eq:clebschLagrange:hamiltonian:hamiltonian\] (q, p, ) = - p - |[K]{}(p), (q, p, ) = q + q,\
\[eq:clebschLagrange:hamiltonian:constraint\] J(q, p) = (q, p, ).
The system on $ \CotBundle Q \times \LieA{g} $ will be referred to as the . We will refer to as the .
It turns out that the Clebsch–Hamilton equations can be written in a form where the dynamics is given by a Hamiltonian vector field (relative to the canonical symplectic structure on $ \CotBundle Q $). As this needs some additional technical insight, we will discuss this aspect in a separate paper.
A special model of a Clebsch–Hamiltonian system is studied in [@GayBalmazHolmRatiu2013]. Let $ (Q, h) $ be a Riemannian manifold, which we assume to be finite-dimensional for simplicity. Moreover, let $ G $ be a (finite-dimensional) Lie group acting on $ Q $. Consider the Lagrangian $$L(q, \dot q, \xi) = \frac{m}{2} \norm{\dot q}^2 - V(q, \xi),$$ where the norm is taken with respect to the Riemannian metric $ h $. Thus, the Clebsch–Lagrange problem consists in minimizing the action functional $$S[q, \xi] = \int_0^T \left(\frac{m}{2} \norm{\dot q + \xi \ldot q}^2 - V(q, \xi)\right).$$ This variational problem is investigated in [@GayBalmazHolmRatiu2013 Section 3.2]. By , the associated Clebsch–Hamiltonian is given by $$H(q, p, \xi) = \frac{1}{2m} \norm{\dot q}^2 + V(q, \xi).$$ Thus, the Clebsch–Hamilton equations take the following form (with respect to the Levi–Civita connection):
$$\begin{aligned}
\DifFrac{}{t} p + \bar{K}(\xi \ldot p) &= - \difpFrac{V}{q},
\\
p^\sharp &= m (\dot q + \xi \ldot q),
\\
J(q, p) &= \difpFrac{V}{\xi},
\end{aligned}$$
where $ p^\sharp \in \TBundle_q Q $ denotes the metric-dual of $ p \in \CotBundle_q Q $. These dynamical equations have been already derived in [@GayBalmazHolmRatiu2013 Equation (3.28)].
In the remainder of this section, we discuss the time dependence of the momentum map constraint. For this purpose, consider the constraint map $ C: \CotBundle Q \times \LieA{g} \to \LieA{g}^* $ defined by $$C(q, p, \xi) = J(q, p) - \difpFrac{H}{\xi}(q, p, \xi).$$ Clearly, the momentum map constraint is equivalent to $ C = 0 $.
\[prop:G-inv-H\] Assume that $ H $ is $ G $-invariant in the sense that $$\label{eq:G-inv-H}
H(g \cdot q, g \cdot p, \AdAction_g \xi) = H(q, p, \xi)$$ for all $ g \in G $. Let $ t \mapsto \gamma(t) = \bigl(q(t), p(t), \xi(t) \bigr) $ be a curve in $ \CotBundle Q \times \LieA{g} $ satisfying the evolution equations . Then, $$\difFrac{}{t} C\bigl(\gamma(t)\bigr) = - \CoadAction_{\xi(t)} C\bigl(\gamma(t)\bigl) - \difFrac{}{t} \left(\difpFrac{H}{\xi}\bigl(\gamma(t)\bigr) \right).$$ In particular, a solution $ \gamma(t) $ of the evolution equations with $ C\bigl(\gamma(t_0)\bigr) = 0 $ is tangent[^3] to the constraint set $ C = 0 $ at $ \gamma(t_0) $ if and only if
(((t))) = 0.
For clarity, we suppress the explicit time dependence in the subsequent calculation. By differentiating the $ G $-invariance identity at the point $ (q, p, \xi) $ with respect to $ g \in G $, using and , we get $$\begin{split}
0
&= \dualPair*{\difpFrac{H}{q}}{\zeta \ldot q} + \dualPair*{\bar{K}(\zeta \ldot p)}{\difpFrac{H}{p}}{} +
\kappa\left(\difpFrac{H}{\xi}, \adAction_\zeta \xi\right)
\end{split}$$ for all $ \zeta \in \LieA{g} $. Here, $ \adAction $ denotes the adjoint action of $ \LieA{g} $, that is, $ \adAction_\zeta \xi = \commutator{\zeta}{\xi} $. Using this equation and the evolution equations , we obtain $$\begin{split}
\difFrac{}{t} \kappa\bigl(C \bigl(\gamma(t)\bigr), \zeta\bigr)
&= \difFrac{}{t} \left(\dualPair{p}{\zeta \ldot q} - \kappa\left(\difpFrac{H}{\xi}, \zeta\right)\right)
\\
&= \dualPair*{\DifFrac{}{t} p}{\zeta \ldot q} + \dualPair*{p}{\DifFrac{}{t} (\zeta \ldot q)} - \kappa\left(\difFrac{}{t} \difpFrac{H}{\xi}, \zeta\right)
\\
&= \dualPair{\bar{K}(\zeta \ldot p)}{\xi \ldot q} - \dualPair{\bar{K}(\xi \ldot p)}{\zeta \ldot q} + \kappa\left(\difpFrac{H}{\xi}, \adAction_\zeta \xi\right)
\\
&\qquad + \dualPair{\bar{K}(\zeta \ldot p)}{\dot q} + \dualPair*{p}{\nabla_{\dot q} \zeta_*} - \kappa\left(\difFrac{}{t} \difpFrac{H}{\xi}, \zeta\right).
\end{split}$$ By , the sum of the fourth and the fifth term vanishes. Moreover, by $ G $-equivariance of $ J $ and by using , we have $$\dualPair{\bar{K}(\zeta \ldot p)}{\xi \ldot q} - \dualPair{\bar{K}(\xi \ldot p)}{\zeta \ldot q} = - \kappa(J(q, p), \adAction_\zeta \xi).$$ This yields the assertion.
A calculation similar to the one in the proof of \[prop:G-inv-H\] yields the following.
\[prop:clebschLagrange:lagrange:constraintConstantOfMotionEulerPoincare\] Assume, instead, that $ H $ is $ G $-invariant in the sense that $$H(g \cdot q, g \cdot p, \xi) = H(q, p, \xi)\, ,$$ for all $ g \in G $. Let $ t \mapsto \gamma(t) = \bigl(q(t), p(t), \xi(t) \bigr) $ be a curve in $ \CotBundle Q \times \LieA{g} $ satisfying the Clebsch–Hamilton equations . Then the curve $ t \mapsto J\bigl(\gamma(t)\bigr) \in \LieA{g}^* $ satisfies the Euler–Poincaré equation
( J((t)) ) = - \_[(t)]{} ( J((t)) ).
Originally, the Clebsch representation refers to a special parameterization of the velocity field of an ideal incompressible fluid. @MarsdenWeinstein1983 have shown that this classical example from fluid dynamics fits into the following geometric framework: Let $ (P, \poissonDot) $ be a Poisson manifold with Hamiltonian $ h: P \to \R $. A of $ P $ is a pair consisting of a symplectic manifold $ M $ and a Poisson map $ \psi: M \to P $. If we let $ H = h \circ \psi $, then $ \psi $ intertwines the Hamiltonian vector fields $ X_H $ and $ X_h $. Thus, by introducing possibly redundant variables, the Hamilton–Poisson equations on $ P $ are written in a symplectic Hamiltonian form on $ M $. The most important class of examples is obtained when $ P = \LieA{g}^* $ endowed with the Lie–Poisson bracket and when $ \psi = J $ is the momentum map for a symplectic $ G $-action on $ M $. Then, $ J $ gives Clebsch variables in which the Euler–Poincaré equations on $ \LieA{g}^* $ are written in a symplectic Hamiltonian form.
Now consider the Clebsch–Hamiltonian setup given by a Clebsch–Hamiltonian $ H: \CotBundle Q \times \LieA{g} \to \R $ which is $ G $-invariant in the sense that $ H(g \cdot q, g \cdot p, \xi) = H(q, p, \xi) $. Then, \[prop:clebschLagrange:lagrange:constraintConstantOfMotionEulerPoincare\] shows that $ \psi = J: \CotBundle Q \to \LieA{g}^* $ intertwines solutions of the Clebsch–Hamilton equations with solutions of the Euler–Poincaré equation on $ \LieA{g}^* $ parametrized by points $ (q,p) \in \CotBundle Q $. In other words, by introducing possibly redundant variables, the (generalized) Euler–Poincaré equations are written in a symplectic Clebsch–Hamilton form.
Many equations (especially from hydrodynamics) can be written as Euler–Poincaré equations on some Lie algebra. For these cases, the Clebsch–Hamilton formalism thus provides a framework to construct different Clebsch-like representations. This observation might turn out to be especially advantageous for coupled equations, Yang–Mills plasmas or relativistic fluids, for which the additional variables in $ \CotBundle Q $ admit a physical interpretation.
Relation to the standard Euler-Lagrange problem {#Ham-Pic-gen}
-----------------------------------------------
In this section, we derive the Clebsch–Legendre transformation from an ordinary Legendre transformation of an extended Lagrangian system. This approach leads to a constraint analysis using the Dirac–Bergmann theory, which for the special cases of Yang–Mills theory and general relativity recovers the discussion of constraints in [@BergveltDeKerf1986; @BergveltDeKerf1986a; @Giulini2015].
### The extended phase space
One can view $ \xi \in \LieA{g} $ also as an ordinary configuration variable and thus formulate the Clebsch–Euler–Lagrange variational principle as an ordinary Euler–Lagrange problem. For that purpose, we extend the configuration space to $$Q_\ext \defeq Q \times \LieA{g}$$ and define $$\label{L-ext}
L_\ext : \TBundle Q_\ext \to \R \, , \quad L_\ext(q, \dot q, \xi, \dot \xi) = L(q, \dot q + \xi \ldot q, \xi) \, .$$
The basic structure for the discussion of the Hamiltonian picture is the cotangent bundle $$\CotBundle Q_\ext = \CotBundle Q \times (\LieA{g} \times \LieA{g}^*)$$ endowed with the natural product symplectic structure. We usually denote points of $ \CotBundle Q_\ext $ by tuples $ (q, p, \xi, \nu) $. First, we observe that the Lie group $\TBundle G$ acts naturally on $\TBundle Q_\ext$. Under the right trivialization $\tau_\textrm{R}$ of $\TBundle G$, $$\tau_\textrm{R}: \LieA{g} \times G \to \TBundle G \, , \quad (\zeta, g) \mapsto \zeta \ldot g \,,$$ the group structure of $ \TBundle G $ is that of a semidirect product $ \LieA{g} \rSemiProduct_{\AdAction} G $. That is, the group multiplication is given by $$\label{eq:TGactionOnQext}
(\xi, a) \cdot (\zeta, b) = (\xi + \AdAction_a \zeta, ab)$$ for $ \xi, \zeta \in \LieA{g} $ and $ a,b \in G $. The pair $ (\zeta, g) \in \LieA{g} \rSemiProduct_{\AdAction} G $ acts on $ Q_\ext $ by $$(\zeta, g) \cdot (q, \xi) \defeq (g \cdot q, \AdAction_g \xi + \zeta).$$ A straightforward calculation shows that the natural lift of the $ \TBundle G $-action to $ \CotBundle Q_\ext $ has the form $$\label{eq:extendedCotangentBundle:liftedAction}
(\zeta, g) \cdot (q, p, \xi, \nu) = (g \cdot q, g \cdot p, \AdAction_g \xi + \zeta, \CoAdAction_g \nu).$$
\[ext-CotB\] Assume that the lifted $ G $-action on the cotangent bundle $ \CotBundle Q $ has a momentum map $ J: \CotBundle Q \to \LieA{g}^* $ (which is automatic in finite dimensions). Then, the cotangent bundle $ \CotBundle Q_\ext $ carries the structure of a Hamiltonian $ \TBundle G $-manifold with the equivariant momentum map $ J_\ext: \CotBundle Q_\ext \to \LieA{g}^* \times \LieA{g}^* $ given by
\[eq:TGmomentumMap\] J\_(q, p, , ) = (, \_+ J(q,p)).
Since the $ G $-action on $ Q $ and the adjoint action are smooth, the $ \TBundle G $-action on $ Q_\ext $ as defined in is smooth, too. The lifted $ \TBundle G $-action on the cotangent bundle $ \CotBundle Q_\ext $ leaves the tautological $ 1 $-form invariant and thus it is symplectic. Moreover, note that the fundamental vector field on $ Q_\ext $ generated by $ (\sigma, \varrho) \in \LieA{g} \times \LieA{g} $ is given by $$(\sigma, \varrho) \ldot (q, \xi) = (\varrho \ldot q, \commutator{\varrho}{\xi} + \sigma).$$ Using the defining relation of the momentum map, we have $$\begin{split}
\kappa\left(J_\ext (q, p, \xi, \nu), (\sigma, \varrho) \right)
&= \dualPair{(p, \nu)}{(\sigma, \varrho) \ldot (q, \xi)}
\\
&= \dualPair{p}{\varrho \ldot q} + \kappa(\nu, -\adAction_\xi \varrho + \sigma)
\\
&= \kappa(\nu, \sigma) + \kappa(\CoadAction_\xi \nu + J(q,p), \varrho),
\end{split}$$ which verifies the asserted formula . The equivariance of $ J_\ext $ is immediate from .
### The Dirac–Bergmann theory of constraints
The extended Lagrangian $ L_\ext $ is never regular, because the velocity vector $ \dot \xi $ does not appear in $ L_\ext $. In order to handle the non-degeneracy, we employ the Dirac–Bergmann theory of constraints. Let us shortly review the algorithm in a geometric language as presented in [@GotayNesterHinds1978].
1. Given a degenerate Lagrangian $ L: \TBundle Q \to \R $, let $ M_1 \subseteq \CotBundle Q $ be the image of the fiber derivative of $ L $. Assume that $ M_1 $ is a smooth submanifold. Then, at least locally, $ M_1 $ is characterized by the vanishing of a collection of functions $ c_i $. The equations $ c_i(q, p) = 0 $ are called the .
2. The Hamiltonian $ H $, as a smooth function on $ M_1 $, is defined by the Legendre transformation $$H\left(q, \difpFrac{L}{\dot{q}}(q, \dot q)\right)
\defeq \dualPair*{\difpFrac{L}{\dot{q}}(q, \dot q)}{\dot q} - L(q, \dot q).$$ Let $ M_2 \subseteq M_1 $ be the subset characterized by the as follows: $$\label{eq:clebsch:hamiltonian:secondaryConstraint}
m \in M_2 \text{ if and only if } \dualPair{\dif_m H}{\TBundle_m M_1 \intersect (\TBundle_m M_1)^\omega} = 0,$$ where $ (\TBundle_m M_1)^\omega $ denotes the symplectic orthogonal of $ \TBundle_m M_1 $ in $ \TBundle_m (\CotBundle Q) $ with respect to the canonical symplectic form $ \omega $. Assume that $ M_2 $ is a smooth submanifold of $ M_1 $.
3. Iterate the process to get a chain of submanifolds
… & M\_i & … & M\_3 & M\_2 & M\_1 & Q,
defined by the condition that $ m \in M_i $ is a point of $ M_{i+1} $ if and only if $ \dualPair{\dif_m H}{\TBundle_m M_1 \intersect (\TBundle_m M_i)^\omega} = 0 $. If the algorithm happens to terminate at a non-empty submanifold $ M_f $, then the dynamics is, by construction, tangent to $ M_f $ and is Hamiltonian with respect to the Hamiltonian $ \restr{H}{M_f} $.
@GotayNesterHinds1978 discuss this algorithm in an infinite-dimensional Banach setting but under the rather restrictive assumption that the symplectic form is strongly symplectic. This assumption never holds for symplectic Fréchet manifolds. Moreover, in [@GotayNesterHinds1978] it is assumed that all subsets $ M_i $ are submanifolds of $ \CotBundle Q $. In our setting, $ M_2 $ turns out to be a momentum map level set and thus it is not a smooth manifold unless the action is free. In view of these problems, we take the Dirac–Bergmann algorithm only as a guide and verify directly at the end that the Hamiltonian system so obtained is indeed equivalent to the Clebsch–Hamilton equations, which in turn are equivalent to the degenerate Lagrangian system we started with, see \[prop:clebschLagrange:legendre\].
We now apply this algorithm to the degenerate Lagrangian $L_\ext: \TBundle Q_\ext \to \R $ defined in . The fiber derivative of $ L_\ext $ is given by $$\left(\difpFrac{L_\ext}{\dot{q}}, \difpFrac{L_\ext}{\dot{\xi}}\right)(q, \dot q, \xi, \dot \xi)
= \left(\difpFrac{L}{\dot{q}}(q, \dot q + \xi \ldot q, \xi), 0\right).$$ Note that this Legendre transformation of the extended system is (essentially) equivalent to the Clebsch–Legendre transformation introduced in . In the case when $ L $ is regular, the range of the fiber derivative is thus $$M_1 \equiv \CotBundle Q \times \LieA{g} \times \set{0} \subseteq \CotBundle Q_\ext = \CotBundle Q \times \LieA{g} \times \LieA{g}^* \, .$$ In other words, the first primary constraint entails that the canonical momentum conjugate to $ \xi $ has to vanish, , $ \nu = 0 $. This should not come as a surprise as $ L_\ext $ does not depend on the velocity vector $ \dot \xi $. The Hamiltonian $ H_\ext $ on $ \CotBundle Q \times \LieA{g} $ is defined by the Legendre transformation of $ L_\ext $, $$\label{H-ext}
H_\ext(q,p,\xi) \defeq \dualPair*{p}{\dot q} - L_\ext(q, \dot q, \xi, 0) \, ,$$ where the relation $$p = \difpFrac{L_\ext}{\dot{q}}(q, \dot q, \xi, \dot \xi)
= \difpFrac{L}{\dot{q}}(q, \dot q + \xi \ldot q, \xi)$$ determines $\dot q$ as a function of $q,p$ and $\xi$. As the next step of the constraint analysis, we have to determine the set of points $ (q, p, \xi) \in M_1 $ for which the linearized Hamiltonian vanishes on the symplectic orthogonal of $ \TBundle_{(q,p,\xi)} M_1 $. We clearly have $$\bigl(\TBundle_{(q,p,\xi)} M_1\bigr)^\omega
= \bigl(\TBundle_{(q,p)} (\CotBundle Q) \times \LieA{g} \times \set{0}\bigr)^\omega
= \set{0} \times (\LieA{g} \times \set{0})
\subseteq \TBundle_{(q,p)} (\CotBundle Q) \times (\LieA{g} \times \LieA{g}^*),$$ because the canonical symplectic form on $ \CotBundle Q $ is weakly non-degenerate and $ \LieA{g} \times \set{0} $ is a Lagrangian subspace of $ \LieA{g} \times \LieA{g}^* $. Thus, the secondary constraint entails that the derivative of $ H_\ext $ in the $ \xi $-direction has to vanish, $$\label{constr-H-ext}
\difpFrac{H_\ext}{\xi}(q,p,\xi) = 0.$$ To summarize, after this step of the constraint analysis, we obtain the following system of constrained Hamilton equations on $ \CotBundle Q_\ext $:
\[eq:clebschLagrange:hamiltonianExt\]$$\begin{gathered}
\label{eq:clebschLagrange:hamiltonianExt:hamiltonian}
\difpFrac{H_\ext}{q}(q, p, \xi) = - \DifFrac{}{t} p, \qquad \difpFrac{H_\ext}{p}(q, p, \xi) = \dot q,
\\
\label{eq:clebschLagrange:hamiltonianExt:constraints}
\nu = 0, \qquad \difpFrac{H_\ext}{\xi}(q,p,\xi) = 0.\end{gathered}$$
The constraints are, in general, not preserved in time and, thus, the Dirac–Bergmann algorithm may yield further constraints. We will return to this question at the end of the section, but first let us relate the constrained Hamiltonian system to the Clebsch–Hamiltonian system . For this, we need the following.
The following identity holds:
\[eq:compositeHamiltonian\] H\_(q, p, ) = H(q, p, ) - (J(q, p), ),
where $ H $ is the Clebsch–Hamiltonian obtained via the Clebsch–Legendre transformation, .
Using , the momentum map relation and the definition of $ H $ as the Legendre transform of $ L $ (with $ v = \dot q + \xi \ldot q $ in the above notation), we calculate $$\begin{aligned}
H_\ext(q, p, \xi)
&= \dualPair{p}{\dot q} - L_\ext(q, \dot q, \xi, 0) \nonumber
\\
&= \dualPair*{p}{\dot q} - L(q, \dot q + \xi \ldot q, \xi)
\\
&= \dualPair*{p}{\dot q + \xi \ldot q} - L(q, \dot q + \xi \ldot q, \xi) - \dualPair*{p}{\xi \ldot q}\nonumber
\\
&= H \left(q, p, \xi \right) - \kappa(J(q, p), \xi).\nonumber \qedhere\end{aligned}$$
The identity allows us to reformulate the equations in a form which involves $ H $ only. Using $ \kappa(J(q, p),\xi) = \dualPair{p}{\xi \ldot q} $, we obtain $$\begin{split}
\difpFrac{H_\ext}{q}(q, p, \xi)
&= \difpFrac{H}{q}(q, p, \xi) + \bar{K}(\xi \ldot p),
\\
\difpFrac{H_\ext}{p}(q, p, \xi)
&= \difpFrac{H}{p}(q, p, \xi) - \xi \ldot q,
\end{split}$$ so that the evolution equations take the form $$\difpFrac{H}{q}(q, p, \xi) = - \DifFrac{}{t} p - \bar{K}(\xi \ldot p), \qquad \difpFrac{H}{p}(q, p, \xi) = \dot q + \xi \ldot q.$$ Similarly, for the $ \xi $-derivative of $ H_\ext $, using , we find $$\difpFrac{H_\ext}{\xi}(q, p, \xi)
= \difpFrac{H}{\xi}(q, p, \xi) - J(q, p).$$ The constraints are, therefore, equivalent to $$\label{eq:Constr}
\nu = 0, \qquad J(q, p) = \difpFrac{H}{\xi}(q, p, \xi).$$ In summary, the constrained Hamiltonian system obtained by the Dirac-Bergmann analysis of the extended system is equivalent to the Clebsch–Hamilton system .
\[prop:clebschLagrange:constraintsAsMomentumMapExtConstraint\] Using \[ext-CotB\], we see that the constraints defined by are equivalent to the momentum map constraint
J\_(q, p, , ) = (0, (q, p, )).
In \[prop:G-inv-H\], we have seen that the dynamics is tangent to the momentum map constraint if $ H $ is $ G $-invariant in the sense of and if, additionally, it does not explicitly depend on the $ \xi $-variable. Thus, in this case, the Dirac–Bergmann algorithm terminates at this stage without introducing further constraints. Let us spell out the details. Since $ H $ does not explicitly depend on $ \xi $, we have $ M_2 = J^{-1}(0) \times \LieA{g} $. Note that $ M_2 $ might have singularities if the action is not free. The “tangent space” to $ J^{-1}(0) $ at a point $ (q, p) $ is the kernel of $ \tangent_{q, p} J $, which by the bifurcation lemma equals $ {(\LieA{g} \ldot (q, p))}^\omega $, [@OrtegaRatiu2003 Proposition 4.5.14] for the finite-dimensional case and [@DiezThesis] for the infinite-dimensional setting. Thus, for a $ G $-invariant Clebsch–Hamiltonian $ H $, the condition[^4] $$0
= \dualPair{\dif_{q, p, \xi} H_\ext}{\TBundle_{q, p, \xi} M_1 \intersect (\TBundle_{q, p, \xi} M_2)^\omega}
= \dualPair{\dif_{q, p} H}{\LieA{g} \ldot (q,p)},$$ is automatically satisfied for all $ (q, p, \xi) \in \CotBundle Q \times \LieA{g} $ and the Dirac algorithm terminates at $ M_2 $.
### Reduction by stages {#sec:clebschLagrange:reductionStages}
As we have seen in \[prop:clebschLagrange:constraintsAsMomentumMapExtConstraint\], the constraints in the Dirac–Bergmann algorithm can be implemented in terms of the momentum map $ J_\ext $ for the lifted $ \TBundle G $-action on $ \CotBundle Q_\ext $. Thus it is natural to think of the symplectically reduced space $ \CotBundle Q_\ext \sslash \TBundle G $ as the true phase space of the theory. In the sequel, we use the theory of symplectic reduction by stages [@MarsdenMisiolekEtAl2007] for the tangent group $ \TBundle G $ to realize the two steps in the Dirac–Bergmann process as two separate symmetry reductions.
The starting point is the cotangent bundle $ \CotBundle Q_\ext $ of the extended configuration space $ Q_\ext $. Let us assume that the Clebsch–Hamiltonian $H$ is $G$-invariant in the sense of and that it does not explicitly depend on $ \xi $. Then, the constraints have the form $ \nu = 0 $ and $ J(q, p) = 0 $, or in other words, $ J_\ext(q,p,\xi,\nu) = 0 $. As we have seen above, the right trivialization $ \tau_\textrm{R} $ identifies $ \TBundle G $ with the semidirect product $ \LieA{g} \rSemiProduct_{\AdAction} G $. It is hence natural to perform symplectic reduction by stages: first quotient out by the Lie algebra $ \LieA{g} $ and then by the Lie group $ G $.
Due to the particularly simple action of $ \LieA{g} $ on $ Q_\ext $ the reduced phase space at the first stage is symplectomorphic to $ \CotBundle Q $. Indeed, the momentum map for the $ \LieA{g} $-action on $ \CotBundle Q_\ext $ is simply given by $$J_{\LieA{g}} (q, p, \xi, \nu) = \nu.$$ Hence, the condition $ J_{\LieA{g}} = 0 $ cuts out exactly the first constraint submanifold $ M_1 = \CotBundle Q \times \LieA{g} \times \set{0} \subset \CotBundle Q_\ext $. Moreover, by , $ \LieA{g} $ acts on $ \CotBundle Q_\ext $ by translation in the $ \LieA{g} $-factor and thus the quotient $ J_{\LieA{g}}^{-1}(0) \slash \LieA{g} $ is diffeomorphic to $ \CotBundle Q $. The regular cotangent bundle reduction theorem [@OrtegaRatiu2003 Theorem 6.6.1] shows that the reduced symplectic form coincides with the canonical one (the problems coming from the infinite-dimensional setting can easily be handled, because the $ \LieA{g} $-bundle $ Q_\ext \to Q $ is trivial). By [@MarsdenMisiolekEtAl2007 Lemma 4.2.6], the momentum map for the residual $ G $-action on the reduced space $ \CotBundle Q $ is induced by the map $$\pr_2 \circ \restr{(J_\ext)}{J_{\LieA{g}}^{-1}(0)} (q, p, \xi) = J(q, p).$$ That is, it coincides with the momentum map for the lifted action on $ \CotBundle Q $. This can be also directly deduced by noting that the residual $ G $-action coincides with the lifted action on the cotangent bundle. In particular, the momentum level set $ J^{-1}(0) $ coincides with the secondary constraint set $ M_2 $.
As the momentum maps under consideration are equivariant, the reduction by stages theorem for semidirect product actions [@MarsdenMisiolekEtAl2007 Theorem 4.2.2] implies that the two-stage reduced space is symplectomorphic to the all-at-once reduced space[^5]. We thus have shown the following.
\[prop:clebschLagrange:reductionStages\] The symplectically reduced space $ \check{M} = J^{-1}(0) \slash G \equiv \CotBundle Q \sslash G $ is symplectomorphic to the symplectic quotient $ J_\ext^{-1}(0) \slash \TBundle G \equiv \CotBundle Q_\ext \sslash \TBundle G $ and we have the following reduction by stages diagram: $$\begin{tikzcd}[column sep=5.9em, row sep=0.02em]
\CotBundle Q_\ext
\ar[r, twoheadrightarrow, "{\sslash \, \LieA{g}}"]
\ar[rr, twoheadrightarrow, "{\sslash \, \TBundle G}", swap, bend right]
& \CotBundle Q
\ar[r,twoheadrightarrow, "{\sslash \, G}"]
& \check{M}.
\end{tikzcd}$$
By this proposition, the symplectic reduction procedure boils down to the symplectic reduction of $\CotBundle Q$ with respect to $G$. This singular reduction will be discussed in detail elsewhere [@DiezRudolphReduction].
Finally, let us comment on the reduction of dynamics. We continue to work in the setting where the Clebsch–Hamiltonian $ H $ is $ G $-invariant in the sense of and does not explicitly depend on $ \xi $. In particular, we view $ H $ as a smooth function on $ \CotBundle Q $. Recall that the Hamiltonian $H_\ext$ is only defined on $ J_{\LieA{g}}^{-1}(0) $ and not on the whole of $ \CotBundle Q_\ext $. By , the $\LieA{g}$-action on $ \CotBundle Q_\ext $ has the form $$(\zeta, {\mathbbm 1}) \cdot (q, p, \xi, \nu) = (q, p, \xi + \zeta, \nu)$$ and, thus, $H_\ext$ as given by is *not* $ \LieA{g} $-invariant. That is, it does not descend to the first reduced space $ J_{\LieA{g}}^{-1}(0) \slash \LieA{g} = \CotBundle Q $. On the other hand, if also the secondary constraint $ J = 0 $ is imposed, then $ H_\ext $ coincides with $H$ and is $ \TBundle G $-invariant. Hence, the Hamiltonian $ H_\ext $ *does* descend to the completely reduced space $ \check{M} \isomorph \CotBundle Q_\ext \sslash \TBundle G $ and the reduction of dynamics boils down to the reduction of $H: \CotBundle Q \to \R$ with respect to $G$. Let us summarize.
\[prop:clebschLagrange:equivalenceHamiltonianReductions\] Let $ H: \CotBundle Q \to \R $ be a $ \xi $-independent Clebsch–Hamiltonian, which is $ G $-invariant in the sense of . Assume that the lifted $ G $-action to $ \CotBundle Q $ has a momentum map $ J $. Then, the following systems of equations are equivalent:
The Clebsch–Hamilton equations on $ \CotBundle Q \times \LieA{g} $ with respect to $ H $.
The constraint Hamilton equations on $ \CotBundle Q_\ext $ with respect to the Hamiltonian $ H_\ext: \CotBundle Q \times \LieA{g} \to \R $ defined by .
The Hamilton equations on $ \check{M} = \CotBundle Q \sslash G \isomorph \CotBundle Q_\ext \sslash \TBundle G $ with respect to the reduced Hamiltonian $ \check{H}: \check{M} \to \R $ defined by $$\pi^* \check{H} = \restr{H}{J^{-1}(0)},$$ where $ \pi: J^{-1}(0) \to J^{-1}(0) \slash G = \check{M} $ is the natural projection.
Since the Clebsch–Hamiltonian $ H: \CotBundle Q \times \LieA{g} \to \R $ is $ \xi $-independent, it may be viewed as an ordinary Hamiltonian on $ \CotBundle Q $. We emphasize, however, that the ordinary Hamilton equation on $ \CotBundle Q $ with respect to $ H $ are *not* equivalent to the Clebsch–Hamilton equations on $ \CotBundle Q \times \LieA{g} $. This explains to some extend the problem one faces when trying to quantize relativistic field theories: in order to make sense of the dynamics, the Hamiltonian and the momentum constraint have to be quantized simultaneously, or, alternatively, the symmetry has to be reduced completely before quantization.
Yang–Mills–Higgs theory {#sec:yangMillsHiggs}
=======================
In this section, we will show how the Yang–Mills–Higgs system fits into the general Clebsch–Lagrange variational framework discussed in \[sec:clebschLagrange\].
Let $ (M, \eta) $ be a $ 4 $-dimensional oriented Lorentzian manifold with signature $ (- + +\, +) $. The underlying geometry of a Yang–Mills-Higgs field, is that of a principal $ G $-bundle $ P \to M $, where $ G $ is a connected compact Lie group. In order to establish the notation, we recall the geometric picture and we refer for details to [@RudolphSchmidt2014]. A connection in $ P $ is a splitting of the tangent bundle $ \TBundle P = \VBundle P \oplus \HBundle P $ into the canonical vertical distribution $ \VBundle P $ and a horizontal distribution $ \HBundle P $. Recall that $ \VBundle P $ is spanned by the Killing vector fields $ p \mapsto \xi \ldot p $ for $ \xi \in \LieA{g} $. Equivalently, a connection is given by a $ G $-equivariant $ 1 $-form $ A \in \DiffFormSpace^1(P, \LieA{g}) $. A bosonic matter field is a section $ \varphi $ of the associated vector bundle $ F = P \times_G \FibreBundleModel{F} $, where the typical fiber $ \FibreBundleModel{F} $ carries a $ G $-representation. Thus, the space of configurations of Yang–Mills–Higgs theory consists of pairs $ (A, \varphi) $. It is obviously the product of the infinite-dimensional affine space $ \ConnSpace $ of connections and the space of sections $ \SectionSpaceAbb{F} $ of $ F $. On $ \ConnSpace \times \SectionSpaceAbb{F} $ we have a left action of the group $ \GauGroup = \sSectionSpace(P \times_G G) $ of local gauge transformations, $$\label{LocGTr}
A \mapsto \AdAction_{\lambda} A - \dif \lambda \, \lambda^{-1},
\quad
\varphi \mapsto \lambda \cdot \varphi,$$ for $ \lambda \in \GauGroup $. Next, recall the notion of the covariant exterior derivative, which we denote by $ \dif_A $. Let $ \alpha \in \DiffFormSpace^k(M, F) $ and let $ \tilde{\alpha} \in \DiffFormSpace^k(P, \FibreBundleModel{F}) $ be its associated horizontal form[^6]. Then, $$\dif_A \tilde{\alpha} = \dif \tilde{\alpha} + A \wedgeldot \tilde{\alpha},$$ where $ \wedgeldot: \DiffFormSpace^r(P, \LieA{g}) \times \DiffFormSpace^k(P, \FibreBundleModel{F}) \to \DiffFormSpace^{r+k}(P, \FibreBundleModel{F}) $ is the natural operation obtained by combining the Lie algebra action $ \LieA{g} \times \FibreBundleModel{F} \to \FibreBundleModel{F}, (\xi, f) \mapsto \xi \ldot f $ with the wedge product operation. An important special case is provided by the curvature $ F_A = \dif_A A $ of the connection $ A $, which is a horizontal $ 2 $-form of type $ \AdAction $ on $ P $ or, equivalently, a $ 2 $-form on $ M $ with values in the adjoint bundle $ \AdBundle P = P \times_G \LieA{g} $. Next, note that the Lie algebra $\GauAlgebra$ of $\GauGroup$ may be naturally identified with $ \sSectionSpace(\AdBundle P ) $. The infinitesimal action of $\xi \in \GauAlgebra$ on $ \ConnSpace(P) $ is given by $$\label{eq:generalGauge:infinitisimalGaugeAction}
\xi \ldot A = \adAction_\xi A - \dif \xi = - \dif_A \xi.$$
Now we can formulate the variational principle for the Yang–Mills–Higgs system on $ \ConnSpace \times \SectionSpaceAbb{F} $. For that purpose we fix an $ \AdAction_G $-invariant scalar product on $ \LieA{g} $ and a $ G $-invariant scalar product on $ \FibreBundleModel{F} $. The Lagrangian for this model is given by the following top differential form on $M$: $$\label{eq:yangMillsHiggs:action}
\SectionSpaceAbb{L}_\textrm{YMH}(A, \varphi) = \frac{1}{2} \wedgeDual{F_A}{\hodgeStar F_A} + \frac{1}{2} \wedgeDual{\dif_A \varphi}{\hodgeStar \dif_A \varphi} - V(\varphi) \vol_\eta,$$ where $ V: F \to \R $ denotes the Higgs potential induced from a smooth $ G $-invariant function $ \FibreBundleModel{V}: \FibreBundleModel{F} \to \R $. In order to underline that the Hodge dual is defined in terms of a linear functional on the space of differential forms, we use the convention that the Hodge dual of a vector-valued differential form $ \alpha \in \DiffFormSpace^k(M, F) $ is the *dual-valued* differential form $ \hodgeStar \alpha \in \DiffFormSpace^{4-k}(M, F^*) $. As we are using $ G $-invariant scalar products on $ \LieA{g} $ and $ \FibreBundleModel{F} $, we have the equivariance property $$\label{equivariance:hodgeStar}
\hodgeStar \, (\AdAction_g \alpha) = \CoAdAction_g (\hodgeStar \alpha).$$ Moreover, for $ \alpha \in \DiffFormSpace^k(M, F) $ and $ \beta \in \DiffFormSpace^{4-k}(M, F^*) $, we denote by $ \wedgeDual{\alpha}{\beta} $ the real-valued top-form that arises from combining the wedge product with the natural pairing $ \dualPairDot: F \times F^* \to \R $. By , the Lagrangian $ L $ is gauge invariant.
The Euler–Lagrange equations corresponding to the Lagrangian , called the , read as follows:
\[eq:yangMillsHiggs4d\]$$\begin{aligned}
\dif_A \hodgeStar F_A + \varphi \diamond \hodgeStar \dif_A \varphi = 0,
\label{eq:yangMillsHiggs:4d:ym}
\\
\dif_A \hodgeStar \dif_A \varphi + V' (\varphi) \vol_\eta = 0,
\label{eq:yangMillsHiggs:4d:higgs}\end{aligned}$$
where the derivative $ V' (\varphi) $ of $ V $ at the point $ \varphi $ is viewed as a fiberwise linear functional on $ F $ and the diamond product[^7] $$\diamond: \DiffFormSpace^k(M, F) \times \DiffFormSpace^{\dim M-r-k}(M, F^*) \to \DiffFormSpace^{\dim M-r}(M, \CoAdBundle P)$$ is defined by $$\label{eq:yangMillsHiggs:defDiamond}
\wedgeDual{\xi}{(\alpha \diamond \beta)}
= \wedgeDual{(\xi \wedgeldot \alpha)}{\beta}
\in \DiffFormSpace^{\dim M}(M)$$ for all $ \xi \in \DiffFormSpace^r(M, \AdBundle P) $. The diamond product is equivariant with respect to gauge transformations in the sense that $$(\lambda \cdot \alpha) \diamond (\lambda \cdot \beta) = \CoAdAction_\lambda (\alpha \diamond \beta)$$ holds for all $ \lambda \in \GauGroup(P) $. Indeed, we have $$\begin{split}
\wedgeDual{\xi}{((\lambda \cdot \alpha) \diamond (\lambda \cdot \beta))}
&= \wedgeDual{(\xi \wedgeldot (\lambda \cdot \alpha))}{(\lambda \cdot \beta)}
\\
&= \wedgeDual{\lambda \cdot ((\AdAction_\lambda^{-1}\xi) \wedgeldot \alpha)}{(\lambda \cdot \beta)}
\\
&= \wedgeDual{\AdAction_\lambda^{-1}\xi}{(\alpha \diamond \beta)}
\\
&= \wedgeDual{\xi}{\CoAdAction_\lambda(\alpha \diamond \beta)} \, ,
\end{split}$$ for all $ \xi \in \DiffFormSpace^r(M, \AdBundle P) $.
In order to write the Yang–Mills equation as a dynamical system we have to single-out a time direction and to split the equations in time and space directions. This decomposition is standard in the physics literature and pretty straightforward in local coordinates. A derivation of the following identities using a geometric, coordinate-independent language can be found in \[sec:yangMillsHiggs:decomposition\]. Let us assume that the spacetime $ (M, \eta) $ is globally hyperbolic and time-oriented. Then, there exists a $3$-dimensional manifold $\Sigma$ and a diffeomorphism $ \iota: \R \times \Sigma \to M $ such that $$\iota^* \eta = - \ell(t)^2 \dif t^2 + g(t),$$ where $ \ell $ is a smooth time-dependent positive function on $ \Sigma $ and $ g $ is a time-dependent Riemannian metric on $ \Sigma $, see [@BarGinouxEtAl2007 Theorem 1.3.10]. The Hodge operator associated to $ g $ is denoted by $ \hodgeStar_g $. Moreover, let $ \diamond_\Sigma $ denote the diamond product relative to $ \Sigma $. For every $ t \in \R $, we denote by $ \iota_t: \Sigma \to M $ the induced embedding and by $ \Sigma_t $ the image of $ \Sigma $ under $ \iota_t $. The submanifold $\Sigma_t$ is a Cauchy hypersurface at $t$. In what follows, we assume $\Sigma$ to be compact and without boundary. This assumption amounts to requiring that the fields satisfy suitable boundary condition at spacial infinity. Following [@GotayIsenbergMarsden2004 Section 6A], a of $ P $ over $ \iota $ is a principal $ G $-bundle $ \vec{\pi}: \vec{P} \to \Sigma $ and a principal bundle isomorphism $ \hat{\iota} $ fitting into the following diagram:
& P\
& M.
By [@Husemoller1966 Corollary 4.9.7], such a slicing always exists for small times; which suffices for the study of the initial value problem. In order to simplify the presentation, let us assume that the slicing exists for all $ t \in \R $.
Relative to the splitting $ \hat{\iota}: \R \times \vec{P} \to P $, the objects living on $ P $ decompose into time-dependents objects living on $ \vec{P} $ and objects normal to $ \vec{P} $. For example, a function $ f: P \to \R $ on $ P $ yields a time-dependent function $ \vec{f}(t) = f \circ \hat{\iota}(t, \cdot) $ on $ \vec{P} $. In the sequel, we will usually suppress the diffeomorphisms $ \hat{\iota} $ and $ \iota $ in our notation. Accordingly, a vector field on $ M $ can be written as $ X = X^0 \, \difp_t + \vec{X} $, where $ X^0(t) \in \sFunctionSpace(\Sigma) $ and $ \vec{X}(t) \in \sSectionSpace(\TBundle \Sigma ) $ for every $ t $. A connection $ A $ in $ P $ decomposes as $$A = A_0 \dif t + \vec{A}$$ into $ A_0(t) \in \sSectionSpace(\AdBundle \vec{P}) $ and a time-dependent connection $ \vec{A}(t) $ in $ \vec{P} $. Moreover, the decomposition of the curvature takes the form $$F_A = E \wedge \dif t + B,$$ where, as usual, we have introduced the time-dependent color-electric field $ E \defeq \dif_{\vec{A}} \, A_0 - \dot{\vec{A}} $ and the color-magnetic field $ B \defeq F_{\vec{A}} $. A section $ \varphi \in \sSectionSpace(F) $ is the same as a time-dependent section of $ \vec{F} $ and its covariant differential reads $$\dif_A \varphi
= \left(\partial_t^{A_0}\varphi\right) \dif t + \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi,$$ where $ \partial_t^{A_0} \varphi \defeq \dot{\varphi} + A_0 \ldot \varphi $ is the covariant time-derivative. According to \[prop:splitting:yangMillsHiggs\], the Yang–Mills–Higgs equations take the following form:
\[eq:yangMillsHiggs3dEvol\]
\_ (\_g B) - \_t\^[A\_0]{} (\^[-1]{} \_[g]{} E) &= - \_(\_g \_ ), \[eq:yangMillsHiggs3d:evol:ampere\]\
\_ (\^[-1]{} \_[g]{} E) &= \^[-1]{} \_(\_g \_t\^[A\_0]{} ), \[eq:yangMillsHiggs3dConstraint\]\
- \_t\^[A\_0]{} (\^[-1]{} \_g \_t\^[A\_0]{} ) + \_ (\_g \_ ) &= V’ ()\_g . \[eq:yangMillsHiggs3d:evol:higgs\]
Note that is the non-abelian counterpart of Ampere’s law and that is the Gauß constraint. Also note that $ A_0 $ is not a dynamical variable.
Formulation as a Clebsch–Lagrange system {#sec:yangMillls:asClebschLagrange}
----------------------------------------
We will now show how the Yang–Mills–Higgs equations can be derived from the Clebsch–Lagrange variational principle. See forthcoming \[table:gaugeTheory:comparisionWithGeneralTheory\] for a comparison of the general Clebsch–Lagrange theory and its concrete implementation in the Yang–Mills–Higgs case. After the $ (1 + 3) $-splitting, the configuration space of the theory is $$\SectionSpaceAbb{Q} = \set*{(\vec{A}, \varphi) \in \ConnSpace(\vec{P}) \times \sSectionSpace(\vec{F})}.$$ Since $ \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} $ is an affine space, its tangent bundle is trivial with fiber $ \DiffFormSpace^1(\Sigma, \AdBundle \vec{P}) \times \sSectionSpace(\vec{F}) $. We will denote points in $ \TBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} $ by tuples $ (\vec{A}, \alpha, \varphi, \zeta) $ with $ \alpha \in \DiffFormSpace^1(\Sigma, \AdBundle \vec{P}) $ and $ \zeta \in \sSectionSpace(\vec{F}) $.
A natural choice for the cotangent bundle $\CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q}$ is the trivial bundle over $\SectionSpaceAbb{Q}$ with fiber $$\DiffFormSpace^2(\Sigma, \CoAdBundle \vec{P}) \times \DiffFormSpace^3(\Sigma, \vec{F}^*)\, .$$ We denote elements of this fiber by pairs $ (D, \pi) $. The natural pairing with $ \TBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} $ is given by integration over $ \Sigma $, $$\dualPair{(D, \pi)}{(\alpha, \zeta)} = \int_\Sigma (\wedgeDual{D}{\alpha} + \wedgeDual{\pi}{\zeta}) \, .$$ As in the finite-dimensional case, the cotangent bundle $ \CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} $ carries a natural symplectic structure. Its canonical $1$-form $\theta$ is given by . In terms of the global coordinates $ (\vec{A}, \varphi, D, \pi) $ on $ \CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} $ it reads[^8] $$\label{eq:cotangentBundleTautologicalOneForm}
\theta_{\vec{A}, \varphi, D, \pi}(\diF \vec{A}, \diF \varphi, \diF D, \diF \pi) = \dualPair{D}{\diF \vec{A}} + \dualPair{\pi}{\diF \varphi},$$ where $ \diF \vec{A} \in \DiffFormSpace^1(\Sigma, \AdBundle \vec{P}) $, $ \diF \varphi \in \DiffFormSpace^0(\Sigma, \vec{F}) $, $ \diF D \in \DiffFormSpace^2(\Sigma, \CoAdBundle \vec{P}) $ and $ \diF \pi \in \DiffFormSpace^0(\Sigma, \vec{F}^*) $ are viewed as tangent vectors on $ \CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} $. The symplectic form $ \Omega $ is given as the exterior differential of $ \theta $, that is, $$\label{eq:yangMillsHiggs:symplecticForm}\begin{split}
\Omega_{\vec{A}, \varphi, D, \pi}&\left((\diF \vec{A}_1, \diF \varphi_1, \diF D_1, \diF \pi_1), (\diF \vec{A}_2, \diF \varphi_2, \diF D_2, \diF \pi_2)\right)
\\
&= \dualPair{\diF D_1}{\diF \vec{A}_2} - \dualPair{\diF D_2}{\diF \vec{A}_1} + \dualPair{\diF \pi_1}{\diF \varphi_2} - \dualPair{\diF \pi_2}{\diF \varphi_1}.
\end{split}$$
The group $ \GauGroup(\vec{P}) $ of local gauge transformations acts naturally on $ \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} $. Since $ A_0 \in \sSectionSpace(\AdBundle \vec{P}) $ can be viewed as an element of $ \GauAlgebra(\vec{P}) $, it is natural to take it as the $ \xi $-variable of the general theory. By , the Killing vector field generated by $ A_0 $ at $ (\vec{A}, \varphi) $ is given by $$A_0 \ldot (\vec{A}, \varphi) = (- \dif_{\vec{A}} A_0, A_0 \ldot \varphi).$$ Hence, in this case, the effective velocities $ \dot q + \xi \ldot q $ are $$\dot{\vec{A}} - \dif_{\vec{A}} A_0 = - E
\quad\text{and}\quad
\dot \varphi + A_0 \ldot \varphi = \partial_t^{A_0} \varphi.$$ The calculation shows that after the $ (1 + 3) $-decomposition the Lagrangian defined in is of the form $ \SectionSpaceAbb{L}_\textrm{YMH} = \dif t \wedge \SectionSpaceAbb{L}_\Sigma $ with $$\SectionSpaceAbb{L}_\Sigma
= \frac{1}{2 \ell} \wedgeDual{E}{\hodgeStar_{g} E} - \frac{\ell}{2}\wedgeDual{B}{\hodgeStar_g B} + \frac{1}{2 \ell} \wedgeDual{\partial_t^{A_0} \varphi}{\hodgeStar_g \partial_t^{A_0} \varphi} - \frac{\ell}{2} \wedgeDual{\dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi}{\hodgeStar_g \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi} - \ell \, V(\varphi) \vol_g .$$ This expression shows that the Yang–Mills–Higgs action is of Clebsch–Lagrange form. To make this precise, we define the Clebsch–Lagrangian $ \SectionSpaceAbb{L}: \TBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} \times \GauAlgebra(\vec{P}) \to \R $ in the coordinates on $\TBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q}$ introduced above by $$\label{calL-YM}\begin{multlined}[c][.85\displaywidth]
\SectionSpaceAbb{L}(\vec{A}, \alpha, \varphi, \zeta, A_0)
= \int_\Sigma \bigg(\frac{1}{2 \ell} \wedgeDual{\alpha}{\hodgeStar_g \alpha} - \frac{\ell}{2}\wedgeDual{B}{\hodgeStar_g B}
\\
+ \frac{1}{2 \ell} \wedgeDual{\zeta}{\hodgeStar_g \zeta} - \frac{\ell}{2} \wedgeDual{\dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi}{\hodgeStar_g \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi} - \ell \, V(\varphi) \vol_g \bigg).
\end{multlined}$$ Note that $ \SectionSpaceAbb{L} $ does not depend on the Lie algebra variable $ A_0 $. Then, the Yang–Mills–Higgs action defined by takes the form: $$\begin{split}
\SectionSpaceAbb{S}[\vec{A}, \varphi, A_0]
&= \int_0^T \int_\Sigma \SectionMapAbb{L}_\textrm{YMH}(A, \varphi)
\\
&= \int_0^T \SectionSpaceAbb{L}(\vec{A}, -E, \varphi, \partial_t^{A_0} \varphi, A_0) \dif t
\\
&= \int_0^T \SectionSpaceAbb{L}(\vec{A}, \dot{\vec{A}} - \dif_{\vec{A}} A_0, \varphi, \dot \varphi + A_0 \ldot \varphi, A_0) \dif t.
\end{split}$$ Comparing with , we see that the variational principle associated to the Yang–Mills–Higgs action $ \SectionSpaceAbb{S} $ is a Clebsch–Lagrange principle with respect to the Clebsch–Lagrangian $ \SectionSpaceAbb{L} $.
Since the Yang–Mills–Higgs equations arise from varying the action $ \SectionSpaceAbb{S} $, the general theory in form of \[prop:clebschLagrange:clebschEulerLagrangeDirect\] implies that the Yang–Mills–Higgs equations in its $ (1 + 3) $-formulation are the Clebsch–Euler–Lagrange equations associated to $ \SectionSpaceAbb{L} $. Let us verify this directly. Since $ \SectionSpaceAbb{L} $ does not depend on $ A_0 \in \GauAlgebra(\vec{P}) $, for the remainder of this subsection we may view it as a function on $ \TBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} $. First, we have to calculate $$\left(\difpFrac{\SectionSpaceAbb{L}}{\vec {A}}, \difpFrac{\SectionSpaceAbb{L}}{\varphi} \right) :
\TBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} \to \R$$ and to realize these functionals as elements of $\CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q}$. As $ \diF F_A = \dif_A \diF A $ and $ \diF (\dif_A \beta) = \diF A \wedgeldot \beta + \dif_A \diF \beta $ for a vector-valued $ k $-form $ \beta $, we obtain $$\begin{aligned}
\difpFrac{\SectionSpaceAbb{L}}{\vec{A}}
&= - \dif_{\vec{A}} \left(\ell \, \hodgeStar_g B \right) - \ell \, \varphi \diamond_\Sigma \hodgeStar_g \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi
\label{eq:yangMills:difLA}
\\
\intertext{and}
\difpFrac{\SectionSpaceAbb{L}}{\varphi}
&= \dif_{\vec{A}} (\ell \hodgeStar_g \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi) - \ell \, V'(\varphi) \vol_g \,.
\label{eq:yangMills:difLPhi}\end{aligned}$$ Next, the fiber derivative of $ \SectionSpaceAbb{L} $, viewed as a mapping $ \TBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} \to \CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} $, is given by $$\left(\difpFrac{\SectionSpaceAbb{L}}{\alpha}, \difpFrac{\SectionSpaceAbb{L}}{\zeta} \right) (\vec{A}, \alpha, \varphi, \zeta)
= \left(\ell^{-1} \hodgeStar_g \alpha, \ell^{-1} \hodgeStar_g \zeta \right).
\label{eq:yangMills:difLFibre}$$ We note, in particular, that $ \SectionSpaceAbb{L} $ is regular. Evaluating at $ (\vec A, \alpha = -E, \varphi, \zeta = \partial_t^{A_0} \varphi )$, we see that the Clebsch–Euler–Lagrange equations take the following form here: $$\begin{aligned}
\label{CL-YM-1}
\difFrac{}{t}(\ell^{-1} \hodgeStar_{g} E) + A_0 \ldot (\ell^{-1} \hodgeStar_{g} E) - \dif_{\vec{A}} (\ell \hodgeStar_g B) - \ell \, \varphi \diamond_\Sigma \hodgeStar_g \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi = 0,
\\
\label{CL-YM-2}
\difFrac{}{t}(\ell^{-1} \hodgeStar_g \partial_t^{A_0} \varphi) + A_0 \ldot (\ell^{-1} \hodgeStar_g \partial_t^{A_0} \varphi) - \dif_{\vec{A}} (\ell \hodgeStar_g \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi) + \ell \, V'(\varphi) \vol_g = 0 \,.\end{aligned}$$ These equations clearly coincide with the Yang–Mills–Higgs equations and .
Now, let us study the momentum map constraint . As usual, the action on the configuration space lifts to the cotangent bundle. In the present setting, the $ \GauGroup(\vec{P}) $-action on the dual variables reads $$\lambda \cdot (D, \pi) = (\CoAdAction_\lambda D, \lambda \cdot \pi).$$ Thus, the fundamental vector field generated by $ \xi \in \GauAlgebra(\vec{P}) $ on $ \CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} $ is given by $$\xi \ldot (\vec{A}, D, \varphi, \pi)
= (- \dif_{\vec{A}} \xi, \CoadAction_\xi D, \xi \ldot \varphi, \xi \ldot \pi).$$ Contracting with the canonical $1$-form $ \theta $ yields $$\begin{split}
\theta (\xi \ldot (\vec{A}, D, \varphi, \pi))
&= \int_\Sigma \bigl(
- \wedgeDual{D}{\dif_{\vec{A}} \xi}
+ \wedgeDual{\pi}{(\xi \ldot \varphi)} \bigr)
\\
&= \int_\Sigma \bigl(
\wedgeDual{\dif_{\vec{A}} D}{\xi}
+ \wedgeDual{(\varphi \diamond_\Sigma \pi)}{\xi} \bigr),
\end{split}$$ from which we read-off the momentum map $$\label{eq:yangMills:momentumMap}
\SectionMapAbb{J}(\vec{A}, D, \varphi, \pi) = \dif_{\vec{A}} D + \varphi \diamond_\Sigma \pi,$$ which takes values in $ \GauAlgebra(\vec{P})^* \isomorph \DiffFormSpace^3(\Sigma, \CoAdBundle \vec{P}) $. As $\SectionSpaceAbb{L}$ does not explicitly depend on $A_0$, the momentum map constraint takes the form $$\label{Gauss-Constr}
\SectionMapAbb{J}(\vec{A}, D, \varphi, \pi) = 0.$$ By the canonically conjugate momenta are $$\label{eq:yangMills:defConjugateMomenta}
(D, \pi)
= \left(- \ell^{-1} \hodgeStar_g E, \ell^{-1} \hodgeStar_g \partial_t^{A_0} \varphi \right) \, .$$ Inserting this expression into , yields the Gauß constraint . To summarize, we have shown the following.
The Yang–Mills–Higgs action is of Clebsch–Lagrange form. Moreover, the Yang–Mills–Higgs equations are equivalent to the Clebsch–Lagrange equations on $ \TBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} \times \GauAlgebra(\vec{P}) $ associated to the Clebsch–Lagrangian $ \SectionMapAbb{L} $ defined in .
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clebsch–Lagrange Yang–Mills–Higgs
------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Configuration variables $ q $ $ \vec{A}, \varphi $
Symmetry variables $ \xi \in \LieA{g} $ $ A_0 \in \sSectionSpace(\AdBundle \vec{P}) $
Effective velocities $ \dot q + \xi \ldot q $ $ -E, \difp_t^{A_0} \varphi $
Conjugate momenta $ p $ $ D, \pi $
$ \difFrac{}{t} \left( \difpFrac{L}{\dot{q}} \right) + \xi \ldot \difpFrac{L}{\dot{q}} = \difpFrac{L}{q} $ $
\begin{gathered}
\dif_{\vec{A}} (\ell \hodgeStar_g B) - \partial_t^{A_0} (\ell^{-1} \hodgeStar_{g} E) = - \ell \, \varphi \diamond_\Sigma (\hodgeStar_g \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi),
\\
- \partial_t^{A_0} (\ell^{-1} \hodgeStar_g \partial_t^{A_0} \varphi) + \dif_{\vec{A}} (\ell \hodgeStar_g \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi) = \ell \, V' (\varphi)\vol_g
\end{gathered}
$
Momentum map constraint $ J\left(q, \difpFrac{L}{\dot q}\right) = - \difpFrac{L}{\xi} $ $ \dif_{\vec{A}} D + \varphi \diamond_\Sigma \pi = 0 $
$ $
\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned}
\difpFrac{H}{q}(q, p, \xi) &= - (\dot p + \xi \ldot p), \dif_{\vec{A}} H - \partial_t^{A_0} D &= - \varphi \diamond_\Sigma \psi,
\\ \\
\difpFrac{H}{p}(q, p, \xi) &= \dot q + \xi \ldot q \partial_t^{A_0}\pi + \dif_{\vec{A}} \psi &= \ell \, V' (\varphi)\vol_g
\end{aligned} \end{aligned}
$ $
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Comparison of the general Clebsch–Lagrange theory and the Yang–Mills–Higgs system.[]{data-label="table:gaugeTheory:comparisionWithGeneralTheory"}
Hamiltonian picture
-------------------
It is straightforward to spell out the results of \[Ham-Pic-gen\] for the model under consideration. Therefore, we limit ourselves to the main points. By definition, the Clebsch–Hamiltonian $ \SectionSpaceAbb{H}: \CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} \times \GauAlgebra(\vec{P}) \to \R $ is the Legendre transform of $ \SectionSpaceAbb{L} $. That is, $$\label{calH}
\SectionSpaceAbb{H}(\vec{A}, D, \varphi, \pi, A_0)
= \dualPair{D}{\alpha} + \dualPair{\pi}{\zeta} - \SectionSpaceAbb{L}(\vec{A}, \alpha, \varphi, \zeta, A_0),$$ where $ \alpha \in \sSectionSpace(\AdBundle(\vec{P})) $ and $ \zeta \in \sSectionSpace(\vec{F}) $ are considered as functions of $ (\vec{A}, D, \varphi, \pi) $ via the condition (, ) $$(D, \pi)
= \left(\difpFrac{\SectionSpaceAbb{L}}{\alpha}, \difpFrac{\SectionSpaceAbb{L}}{\zeta} \right) (\vec{A}, \alpha, \varphi, \zeta)
= \left(\ell^{-1} \hodgeStar_g \alpha, \ell^{-1} \hodgeStar_g \zeta \right).$$ Since $ \SectionMapAbb{L} $ does not depend on $ A_0 $, the Clebsch–Hamiltonian $ \SectionMapAbb{H} $ is independent of $ A_0 $, too. By , we have $$\label{eq:yangMills:hamiltonian}\begin{split}
\SectionSpaceAbb{H}(\vec{A}, D, \varphi, \pi, A_0)
&= \dualPair{D}{\ell \hodgeStar_g D} + \dualPair{\pi}{\ell \hodgeStar_g \pi} - \SectionSpaceAbb{L}(\vec{A}, \ell \hodgeStar_g D, \varphi, \ell \hodgeStar_g \pi, A_0),
\\
&
\!\begin{multlined}[b][.55\displaywidth]
= \int_\Sigma \bigg( \ell \wedgeDual{D}{\hodgeStar_g D} + \ell \wedgeDual{\pi}{\hodgeStar_g \pi} - \frac{\ell}{2} \wedgeDual{D}{\hodgeStar_g D} + \frac{\ell}{2}\wedgeDual{B}{\hodgeStar_g B}
\\
- \frac{\ell}{2} \wedgeDual{\pi}{\hodgeStar_g \pi} + \frac{\ell}{2} \wedgeDual{\dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi}{\hodgeStar_g \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi} + \ell \, V(\varphi) \vol_g \bigg)
\end{multlined}
\\
&
\!\begin{multlined}[b][.71\displaywidth]
= \int_\Sigma \frac{\ell}{2} \bigg( \wedgeDual{D}{\hodgeStar_g D} + \wedgeDual{B}{\hodgeStar_g B}
\\
+ \wedgeDual{\pi}{\hodgeStar_g \pi} + \wedgeDual{\dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi}{\hodgeStar_g \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi} + 2 \, V(\varphi) \vol_g \bigg) \, .
\end{multlined}
\end{split}$$ In summary, the general theory from \[Ham-Pic-gen\] yields the following.
The Clebsch–Hamilton equations for $ \SectionMapAbb{H} $ are given by the following system of equations on $ \CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} \times \GauAlgebra(\vec{P}) $: $$\label{eq:yangMills:asClebschHamilton}\begin{split}
\partial_t^{A_0} D &= - \dif_{\vec{A}} (\ell \hodgeStar_g B) - \ell \varphi \diamond \hodgeStar_g \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi,
\\
\partial_t \vec{A} &= \dif_{\vec{A}} A_0 + \ell \hodgeStar_g D,
\\
\partial_t^{A_0}\pi &= \dif_{\vec{A}} (\ell \hodgeStar_g \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi) - \ell \, V'(\varphi) \vol_g,
\\
\partial_t^{A_0}\varphi &= \ell \hodgeStar_g \pi,
\\
\dif_{\vec{A}} D &+ \varphi \diamond_\Sigma \pi = 0 \, .
\end{split}$$ These equations are equivalent to the Yang–Mills–Higgs equations .
Since the Lagrangian $ \SectionMapAbb{L} $ is regular, the claim follows directly from the general equivalence of the Clebsch–Lagrange and Clebsch–Hamilton equations under the Legendre transformation, see \[prop:clebschLagrange:legendre\]. For completeness, let us also give a direct proof, that is, let us write down the Clebsch–Hamilton equations for the case under consideration. From , we obtain $$\difpFrac{\SectionMapAbb{H}}{\vec{A}} = \dif_{\vec{A}} (\ell \hodgeStar_g B) + l \varphi \diamond \hodgeStar_g \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi$$ and $$\difpFrac{\SectionMapAbb{H}}{\varphi} = - \dif_{\vec{A}} (\ell \hodgeStar_g \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi) + \ell \, V'(\varphi) \vol_g.$$ Moreover, we obviously have $$\difpFrac{\SectionMapAbb{H}}{D} = \ell \hodgeStar_g D,
\qquad
\difpFrac{\SectionMapAbb{H}}{\pi} = \ell \hodgeStar_g \pi,
\qquad
\difpFrac{\SectionMapAbb{H}}{A_0} = 0.$$ As we have already seen, the constraint reads $$\dif_{\vec{A}} D + \varphi \diamond_\Sigma \pi =0$$ and corresponds to the Gauß constraint . Thus the Clebsch–Hamilton equations yield . Using expression for the canonical momenta, it is straightforward to see that recovers the Yang–Mills–Higgs equations , indeed.
Note that the metric $ g $ on $ \Sigma $ depends on time. Accordingly, the Hamiltonian is explicitly time-dependent and so it is not a constant of motion for curved spacetimes.
Constraints and reduction by stages
-----------------------------------
Recall that the Clebsch–Hamilton equations can also be obtained by passing through an extended phase space and implementing the constraints using the Dirac–Bergmann algorithm in the formulation of [@GotayNesterHinds1978]. Here, we apply the general theory of \[Ham-Pic-gen\] to the Yang–Mills–Higgs case.
By definition, the extended configuration space is $ \SectionSpaceAbb{Q}_\ext \defeq \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} \times \GauAlgebra(\vec{P}) $. Thus, the natural extended phase space induced by Hodge duality is $$\CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q}_\ext \defeq \CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} \times \GauAlgebra(\vec{P}) \times \DiffFormSpace^3(\Sigma, \CoAdBundle \vec{P}).$$ We will denote points in $ \CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q}_\ext $ by tuples $ (\vec{A}, D, \varphi, \pi, A_0, \nu) $. As in the general theory, associated with the Clebsch–Lagrangian $ \SectionSpaceAbb{L}: \TBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} \times \GauAlgebra(\vec{P}) \to \R $ as in , we have a degenerate Lagrangian $\SectionSpaceAbb{L}_\ext$ given by and we can, thus, perform the Dirac-Bergmann constraint analysis as in \[Ham-Pic-gen\]. As in the general theory, the primary constraint is $ \nu = 0 $. Let $ \SectionSpaceAbb{M}_1 \isomorph \CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} \times \GauAlgebra(\vec{P}) $ be the subspace cut out by this constraint. Let $ \SectionSpaceAbb{H}_\ext: \SectionSpaceAbb{M}_1 \to \R $ be the Hamiltonian corresponding to $\SectionSpaceAbb{L}_\ext$. Using and , from we read off $$\label{calHext}
\SectionSpaceAbb{H}_\ext (\vec{A}, D, \varphi, \pi, A_0) = \SectionSpaceAbb{H}(\vec{A}, D, \varphi, \pi, A_0) - \dualPair{\dif_{\vec{A}} D + \varphi \diamond_\Sigma \pi}{A_0}.$$ The next step in the constraint analysis leads to the constraint and, thus, to the system of Hamilton equations given by . We have already seen that the constraint coincides with the Gauß constraint. As $\SectionSpaceAbb{H}$ is gauge invariant and does not explicitly depend on $A_0$, \[prop:G-inv-H\] implies that the Gauß constraint is preserved in time. Consequently, the constraint analysis terminates at that stage. The Hamiltonian $ \SectionMapAbb{H}_\ext $ transforms under local gauge transformations as follows: $$\begin{split}
\SectionMapAbb{H}_\ext&(\AdAction_\lambda \vec{A} + \lambda \dif \lambda^{-1}, \CoAdAction_\lambda D, \lambda \cdot \varphi, \lambda \cdot \pi, \AdAction_\lambda A_0 - \xi)
\\
&= \SectionMapAbb{H}_\ext(\vec{A}, D, \varphi, \pi, A_0)
+ \int_\Sigma \dualPair{(\dif_{\vec{A}} D + \varphi \diamond_\Sigma \pi)}{\AdAction_{\lambda}^{-1} \xi}.
\end{split}$$ In particular, $ \SectionMapAbb{H}_\ext $ is not gauge invariant unless the Gauß constraint is imposed. Using the terminology common in physics, one could say that the extended Hamiltonian is invariant “on-shell”.
According to the discussion of the general reduction theory in \[sec:clebschLagrange:reductionStages\], the action of $ \TBundle \GauGroup(\vec{P}) $ on $ \CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q}_\ext $ plays an important role. We will now show that, in the present context, this action is derived from the action of $ \GauGroup $ on $ \ConnSpace \times \SectionSpaceAbb{F} $. Recall from the action of the group of local gauge transformations $ \GauGroup $ on the space of connections $ \ConnSpace $, $$\lambda \cdot A = \AdAction_\lambda A - \difLog^R \lambda,$$ where $ \lambda $ is a $ G $-equivariant map $ P \to G $ and $ \difLog^R \lambda \defeq \dif \lambda \, \lambda^{-1} \in \DiffFormSpace^1(P, \LieA{g}) $ denotes the right logarithmic derivative. Via the $(1+3)$-decomposition, we may equivalently think of a gauge transformation $ \lambda \in \GauGroup $ as a time-dependent gauge transformation $ \lambda(t) $ in $ \vec{P} $. Evaluating $\lambda \cdot A $ on a vector field $Y$ on $P$, decomposed as $ Y = Y^0 \difp_t + \vec{Y} $, we obtain $$\begin{split}
(\lambda \cdot A) (Y^0 \difp_t + \vec{Y})
&= Y^0 \AdAction_\lambda A_0 - Y^0 \difLog^R_t \lambda + \AdAction_\lambda \vec{A}(\vec{Y}) - \difLog^R \lambda (\vec{Y})
\\
&= Y^0 (\AdAction_\lambda A_0 - \difLog^R_t \lambda) + (\lambda \cdot \vec{A})(\vec{Y}),
\end{split}$$ where $ \difLog^R_t \lambda \in \sSectionSpace(\AdBundle \vec{P}) $ denotes the right logarithmic derivative of the path $ t \mapsto \lambda(t) \in \GauGroup(\vec{P}) $. That is, $$\difLog^R_t \lambda
= \difLog^R \lambda (\difp_t)
= \tangent \lambda (\difp_t) \ldot \lambda^{-1}
\equiv \dot{\lambda} \, \lambda^{-1}
\in \GauAlgebra(\vec{P}).$$ Thus, the action of gauge transformations on connections on $ P $ decomposes into the action $ A_0 \mapsto \AdAction_\lambda A_0 - \difLog^R_t \lambda $ and the natural action on the space $\ConnSpace (\vec P)$ of connections on $ \vec{P} $. The crucial observation is that the action only depends on $ \lambda(t) \in \GauGroup(\vec{P}) $ and on the first derivative $ \difLog^R_t \lambda $. In other words, the action of the group of time-dependent gauge transformations on the pair $ (A_0, \vec{A}) $ factors through the following action of the tangent group $ \TBundle \GauGroup(\vec{P}) $: $$\begin{split}
(\xi, \lambda) \cdot A_0 &= \AdAction_\lambda A_0 - \xi,
\\
(\xi, \lambda) \cdot \vec{A} &= \AdAction_\lambda \vec{A} - \difLog^R \lambda,
\end{split}$$ where $ (\xi, \lambda) \in \GauAlgebra(\vec{P}) \times \GauGroup(\vec{P}) $ is viewed as the element of $ \TBundle \GauGroup(\vec{P}) $ under the right trivialization $ (\xi, \lambda) \mapsto \xi \ldot \lambda $. The action of $ \GauGroup $ on the matter field $ \varphi \in \sSectionSpace(F) $ is considerably simpler, because it does not involve derivatives in the time direction and thus comes down to an action of $ \GauGroup(\vec{P}) $ on $ \sSectionSpace(\vec{F}) $ for every moment of time. In summary, we get a natural action of $ \TBundle \GauGroup(\vec{P}) $ on the extended configuration space of the theory.
Moreover, $ \TBundle \GauGroup(\vec{P}) = \GauAlgebra(\vec{P}) \rSemiProduct \GauGroup(\vec{P}) $. As $ \SectionSpaceAbb{H} $ is $ \GauGroup(\vec{P}) $-invariant and does not explicitly depend on $ A_0 $, \[prop:clebschLagrange:reductionStages\] holds and we have the following commutative diagram of symplectic reductions: $$\begin{tikzcd}[column sep=5.9em, row sep=0.02em]
\CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q}_\ext
\ar[r, twoheadrightarrow, "{\sslash \GauAlgebra(\vec{P})}"]
\ar[rr, twoheadrightarrow, "{\sslash \TBundle \GauGroup(\vec{P})}", swap, bend right]
& \CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q}
\ar[r,twoheadrightarrow, "{\sslash \GauGroup(\vec{P})}"]
& \check{\SectionSpaceAbb{M}},
\end{tikzcd}$$ where $ \check{\SectionSpaceAbb{M}} = \SectionMapAbb{J}^{-1}(0) \slash \GauGroup(\vec{P}) $ is the reduced phase space of the theory. In the first reduction step, we pass from the variables $ (\vec{A}, D, \varphi, \pi, A_0, \nu) $ to the variables $ (\vec{A}, D, \varphi, \pi) $. In this language, the temporal gauge $ A_0 = 0 $ often used in physics acquires the geometric interpretation of a section in $ \CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} \times \GauAlgebra(\vec{P}) \to \CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} $. Moreover, \[prop:clebschLagrange:equivalenceHamiltonianReductions\] immediately gives the following.
The following systems of equations are equivalent:
The Yang–Mills–Higgs equations .
The Clebsch–Hamilton equations on $ \CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} \times \GauAlgebra(\vec{P}) $ with respect to $ \SectionMapAbb{H} $.
The constraint Hamilton equations on $ \CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q}_\ext $ with respect to the Hamiltonian $ \SectionMapAbb{H}_\ext $.
The Hamilton equations on $ \check{\SectionSpaceAbb{M}} $ with respect to the reduced Hamiltonian $ \check{\SectionMapAbb{H}}: \check{\SectionSpaceAbb{M}} \to \R $ defined by $$\pi^* \check{\SectionMapAbb{H}} = \restr{\SectionMapAbb{H}}{\SectionMapAbb{J}^{-1}(0)},$$ where $ \pi: \SectionMapAbb{J}^{-1}(0) \to \check{\SectionSpaceAbb{M}} $ is the natural projection.
Since the Clebsch–Hamiltonian $ \SectionMapAbb{H}: \CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} \times \GauAlgebra(\vec{P}) \to \R $ is $ A_0 $-independent, it may be viewed as an ordinary Hamiltonian on $ \CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} $. We emphasize that the ordinary Hamilton equations on $ \CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} $ with respect to $ \SectionMapAbb{H} $ are *not* equivalent to the Yang–Mills–Higgs equations unless the Gauß constraint is also imposed. The geometry of the reduced phase space $ \check{\SectionSpaceAbb{M}} $ will be studied in [@DiezRudolphReduction].
General relativity
==================
We will now consider Einstein’s equation of general relativity and show how it fits into the general Clebsch–Lagrange variational framework.
Let $ M $ be a $ 4 $-dimensional oriented manifold. We are interested in solutions of Einstein’s equation $$\Ric_\eta - \frac{1}{2} \RicScalar_\eta \, \eta = 8 \pi T,$$ where $ \Ric_\eta $ and $ \RicScalar_\eta $ denote, respectively, the Ricci curvature and the Ricci scalar curvature of the Lorentzian metric $ \eta $ on $ M $ to be determined. For simplicity, we will restrict attention to the vacuum setting, for which the energy-momentum tensor $ T $ vanishes and Einstein’s equation is equivalent to $ \Ric_\eta = 0 $. Equivalently, we are looking for extrema of the Einstein–Hilbert action $$\label{eq:generalRelativity:einsteinHilbert4D}
\SectionSpaceAbb{S}[\eta] = \frac{1}{2} \int_M \RicScalar_\eta \, \vol_\eta,$$ defined on the space of Lorentzian metrics on $ M $ with signature $ (- + +\, +) $.
In order to formulate as a Clebsch–Lagrange variational problem, we proceed similarly to the study of the Yang–Mills–Higgs equations:
1. Using a splitting of spacetime, formulate Einstein’s equation as a Cauchy problem in the variables $ (S, \ell, g) $, where $ S $ is the shift vector, $ \ell $ is the lapse function and $ g $ is the spatial metric.
2. Realize $ S $ and $ \ell $ as elements of the Lie algebra of the diffeomorphism group of $ M $ and determine their action on the space of spatial metrics.
3. Calculate the Lagrangian in the $ (1+3) $-splitting and show that it is of the Clebsch–Lagrange form.
4. Determine the momentum map constraint and compare it to the diffeomorphism and Hamiltonian constraint.
5. Pass to the Hamiltonian picture using the Clebsch–Legendre transformation.
First, we formulate Einstein’s equation as a Cauchy problem, see [@Wald1984 Section 10.2]. For this purpose, choose a slicing of $ M $, that is, a diffeomorphism $ \iota: \R \times \Sigma \to M $, where $ \Sigma $ is a compact manifold that will play the role of a Cauchy hypersurface. For simplicity, we assume that $ \Sigma $ has no boundary[^9]. For every $ t \in \R $, let $ \iota_t: \Sigma \to M $ denote the smooth curve of embeddings associated to $ \iota $. Assume that these embeddings are spacelike. Let $ \Sigma_t = \iota_t (\Sigma) $ be the corresponding submanifold of $ M $ and denote its unit[^10] normal vector field by $ \nu $. Since $ \iota $ is a diffeomorphism, we have the following splitting of the tangent space $$\TBundle_{\iota(t, x)} M = \R \, \nu_{\iota(t, x)} \oplus \tangent_{(t,x)} \iota (\TBundle_x \Sigma)$$ for every $ t \in \R $ and $ x \in \Sigma $. Accordingly, every vector field on $ M $ decomposes into parts normal and tangent to $ \Sigma_t $. In particular, for the time vector field, we obtain $$\difpFracAt{}{t}{t} \iota_t = \tangent \iota (\difp_t) = \ell \, \nu + \tangent \iota_t (S),$$ where $ \ell(t) \in \sFunctionSpace(\Sigma) $ is the and $ S(t) \in \VectorFieldSpace(\Sigma) $ is the . Moreover, $ \eta $ induces by pull-back a family $ g(t) = \iota^*_t \eta $ of Riemannian metrics on $ \Sigma $. In terms of these data, the pull-back of $ \eta $ to $ \R \times \Sigma $ is given by $$\iota^* \eta = \Matrix{- \ell^2 + g (S, S) & g(S, \cdot) \\ g(S, \cdot) & g}.$$ In particular, the knowledge of the data $ (S, \ell, g) $ is enough to reconstruct $ \eta $ (in a neighborhood around $ \Sigma_0 $).
Formulation as a Clebsch–Lagrange system {#formulation-as-a-clebschlagrange-system}
----------------------------------------
In order to make contact to the general Clebsch–Lagrange theory, we need to identify the Lie algebra-valued fields and the configuration space on which the Lie group acts. Since the lapse function and the shift vector field are known to be related to the diffeomorphism invariance of the theory, they are natural candidates for the Lie algebra-valued fields leaving the metric $ g $ as the configuration variable. To make this idea precise, let $ \SectionSpaceAbb{G} $ be the Lie group consisting of diffeomorphisms $ \phi $ of $ \R \times \Sigma $ that are of the form $ \phi(t, x) = (t + \bar{\phi}(x), \varphi(x)) $, where $ \bar{\phi} $ is a real-valued function on $ \Sigma $ and $ \varphi $ is a diffeomorphism of $ \Sigma $. Using the slicing $ \iota $ we can view $ \SectionSpaceAbb{G} $ as a subgroup of the group $ \DiffGroup(M) $ of diffeomorphisms of $ M $. If $ \R \times \Sigma \to \Sigma $ is viewed as a principal $ \R $-bundle, then $ \SectionSpaceAbb{G} $ is identified with the group of principal bundle automorphism. Clearly, $ \SectionSpaceAbb{G} $ has the following semidirect product structure: $$\SectionSpaceAbb{G} = \DiffGroup(\Sigma) \lSemiProduct \sFunctionSpace(\Sigma),$$ where the group $ \DiffGroup(\Sigma) $ of diffeomorphisms of $ \Sigma $ acts on $ \sFunctionSpace(\Sigma) $ by pull-back. Thus, the Lie algebra $ \mathrm{L}\SectionSpaceAbb{G} $ of $ \SectionSpaceAbb{G} $ is the semidirect product of $ \VectorFieldSpace(\Sigma) $ and $ \sFunctionSpace(\Sigma) $. Hence, $ (S, \ell) $ are naturally elements of $ \mathrm{L}\SectionSpaceAbb{G} $. Correspondingly, the configuration space $ \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} $ of the theory is the space $ \MetricSpace(\Sigma) $ of Riemannian metrics on $ \Sigma $. There is a natural left action of $ \SectionSpaceAbb{G} $ on $ \MetricSpace(\Sigma) $ through the projection onto $ \DiffGroup(\Sigma) $: $$(\varphi, \bar{\phi}) \cdot g \defeq (\varphi^{-1})^* g .$$ Correspondingly, $ (X, f) \in \mathrm{L}\SectionSpaceAbb{G} $ acts on $ g \in \MetricSpace(\Sigma) $ as $$\label{eq:generalRelativity:actionLieAlgebra}
(X, f) \ldot g = - \difLie_X g.$$ Recall (, from [@Giulini2015 Equation 232]) that the variation of $ g $ is connected to the extrinsic curvature $ k(t) \in \SymTensorFieldSpace^2(\Sigma) $ by $$\dot{g} \equiv \difFracAt{}{t}{t} g(t) = \difLie_S g + 2 \ell k,$$ where $ \difLie_S $ is the Lie derivative along $ S $. Thus, by , the effective velocity $ \dot{q} + \xi \ldot q $ of the general Clebsch–Lagrange theory is given by $$\label{eq:generalRelativity:effectiveVelocity}
\dot{g} + (S, \ell) \ldot g = \difLie_S g + 2 \ell k - \difLie_S g = 2 \ell k.$$
Let us recall how the Einstein–Hilbert action looks like in terms of the variables $ (S, \ell, g) $, see, , [@Wald1984 Appendix E.2; @Giulini2015 Section 5 and 6]. Using Gauß’ formula, the Ricci scalar curvature $ \RicScalar_\eta $ of $ \eta $ can be written in terms of the Ricci scalar curvature $ \RicScalar_g $ of $ g(t) $ and the second fundamental form $ k(t) \in \SymTensorFieldSpace^2(\Sigma) $ of the embedding $ \iota_t $: $$\label{eq:generalRelativity:ricciScalar}
\RicScalar_\eta = \RicScalar_g - 2 \Ric_\eta (\nu, \nu) - \norm{k}^2_g + (\tr_g k)^2.$$ Moreover, we have the Ricci equation, $$\label{eq:generalRelativity:ricciEq}
\Ric_\eta(\nu, \nu) = (\tr_g k)^2 - \norm{k}^2_g + \divergence_g v,$$ where $ v(t) \in \VectorFieldSpace(\Sigma) $ is a certain time-dependent vector field. We assume that $ M $ is oriented and time-oriented in such a way that $ \iota^* \vol_\eta = \ell \dif t \wedge \vol_g $. Then, inserting into and using the fact $ \Sigma $ has no boundary, the Einstein–Hilbert action takes the following form relative to the splitting $ \iota $: $$\label{eq:generalRelativity:einsteinHilbert3D}
\SectionSpaceAbb{S}[g, S, \ell]
= \int_0^T \dif t \, \int_\Sigma \ell \left(\RicScalar_{g} + \norm{k}^2_{g} - (\tr_{g} k)^2\right) \, \vol_{g}.$$ The space of metrics on $ \Sigma $ is an open cone in the space $ \SymTensorFieldSpace^2(\Sigma) $ of symmetric $ 2 $-tensors. Thus, the tangent bundle $ \TBundle \MetricSpace(\Sigma) $ may be identified with $ \MetricSpace(\Sigma) \times \SymTensorFieldSpace^2(\Sigma) $. We will denote elements of $ \TBundle \MetricSpace(\Sigma) $ by pairs $ (g, h) $ with $ g \in \MetricSpace(\Sigma) $ and $ h \in \SymTensorFieldSpace^2(\Sigma) $. In terms of these variables, define the Clebsch–Lagrangian $ \SectionSpaceAbb{L}: \TBundle \MetricSpace(\Sigma) \times \mathrm{L} \SectionSpaceAbb{G} \to \R $ by $$\SectionSpaceAbb{L}(g, h, S, \ell) = \int_\Sigma \left( \ell \, \RicScalar_{g} + \frac{1}{4 \ell} \norm{h}^2_{g} - \frac{1}{4 \ell} (\tr_{g} h)^2\right) \, \vol_{g},$$ which is the counterpart of $ L(q, \dot q, \xi) $ in the general theory. Then, using , the Einstein–Hilbert action reads as follows: $$\label{eq:generalRelativity:einsteinHilbert3DClebschForm}
\SectionSpaceAbb{S}[g, S, \ell]
= \int_0^T \dif t \, \SectionSpaceAbb{L}(g, 2 \ell k, S, \ell)
= \int_0^T \dif t \, \SectionSpaceAbb{L}(g, \dot{g} + (S, \ell) \ldot g, S, \ell).$$ Hence, we see that the Einstein–Hilbert action is of the general Clebsch–Lagrange form with Clebsch–Lagrangian $ \SectionSpaceAbb{L} $. We emphasize that, in sharp contrast to the Yang–Mills case, the Clebsch–Lagrangian of general relativity depends on the Lie algebra variable $ \xi = (S, \ell) $, more precisely, it depends on $ \ell $ but not on $ S $.
Now, consider the cotangent bundle of $ \MetricSpace(\Sigma) $. The dual space to $ \SymTensorFieldSpace^2(\Sigma) $ with respect to the integration pairing is the space $ \SymTensorFieldSpace_2(\Sigma; \VolSpace) $ of volume-form-valued contravariant symmetric $ 2 $-tensors. Hence, it is natural to define $ \CotBundle \MetricSpace(\Sigma) = \MetricSpace(\Sigma) \times \SymTensorFieldSpace_2(\Sigma; \VolSpace) $ endowed with the natural symplectic structure. We will denote the conjugate momenta by $ \pi $. By \[prop:clebschLagrange:legendre\], the associated constraint is given by the momentum map $ \SectionSpaceAbb{J} $ for the lifted $ \DiffGroup(\Sigma) $-action on $ \CotBundle \MetricSpace(\Sigma) $. As in the general theory, denote the natural integration paring of $ \mathrm{L}\SectionSpaceAbb{G} $ with $ \mathrm{L}\SectionSpaceAbb{G}^* = \DiffFormSpace^1(\Sigma, \VolSpace) \times \VolSpace(\Sigma) $ by $ \kappa $. Now, consider the momentum map given by . Using together with the Koszul identity and metric compatibility, we calculate $$\begin{aligned}
\kappa\left(\SectionSpaceAbb{J}(g, \pi), (X, f)\right)
&= \dualPair{\pi}{(X, f) \ldot g}
\\
&= - \int_\Sigma \dualPair{\pi}{\difLie_X g}
\\
&= - 2 \int_\Sigma \dualPair{\pi}{\Sym g(\nabla_{(\cdot)} X, \cdot)}
\\
&= - 2 \int_\Sigma \dualPair{\pi}{\Sym (\nabla_{(\cdot)} X^\flat) (\cdot)},
\intertext{where \( X^\flat(Y) = g(X, Y) \). Since \( \Sigma \) has no boundary, integration by parts yields}
\kappa\left(\SectionSpaceAbb{J}(g, \pi), (X, f)\right)
&= 2 \int_\Sigma \dualPair{\divergence_g \pi}{X^\flat},\end{aligned}$$ where the divergence of $ \pi $ is defined as the trace of $ \nabla_{(\cdot)} \pi (\cdot, \cdot) $, that is, in abstract index notation $ (\divergence_g \pi)^j = \nabla_i \pi^{ij} $. Hence, the momentum map with respect to the natural integration pairing is given by $$\SectionSpaceAbb{J}(g, \pi) = \left( 2 (\divergence_g \pi)^\flat, 0 \right) \in \DiffFormSpace^1(\Sigma, \VolSpace) \times \VolSpace(\Sigma).$$ The fiber derivative $ \difpFrac{\SectionSpaceAbb{L}}{h}: \TBundle \MetricSpace(\Sigma) \times \mathrm{L}\SectionSpaceAbb{G} \to \CotBundle \MetricSpace(\Sigma) $ is given by $$\label{eq:generalRelativity:legendreTransformation}
\difpFrac{\SectionSpaceAbb{L}}{h}
= \frac{1}{2 \ell} \bigl( \,g(h, \cdot) - \tr_g h \, \tr_g (\cdot) \bigr) \vol_g.$$ Moreover, we have $$\difpFrac{\SectionSpaceAbb{L}}{S} = 0,
\qquad
\difpFrac{\SectionSpaceAbb{L}}{\ell} = \left( \RicScalar_{g} - \frac{1}{4 \ell^2} \norm{h}^2_{g} + \frac{1}{4 \ell^2} (\tr_{g} h)^2\right) \, \vol_{g}.$$ Using these identities, a straightforward calculation shows that the momentum map constraint takes the form
\[eq:generalRelativity:constraints\]$$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:generalRelativity:constraints:diffeo}
\divergence_g k - \grad_g (\tr_g k) = 0,
\\
\label{eq:generalRelativity:constraints:hamiltonian}
0 = \RicScalar_{g} - \norm{k}^2_{g} + (\tr_{g} k)^2.\end{aligned}$$
Equations and are called the and the , respectively. Hence, in our framework, these constraints are derived from the momentum map constraint .
We emphasize that the Hamiltonian constraint stands on a different footing than the diffeomorphism constraint. This is due to the fact that the $ \sFunctionSpace(\Sigma) $-part of $ \SectionSpaceAbb{G} $ does not act on the configuration space. Whereas the diffeomorphism constraint arises from setting the $ \DiffGroup(\Sigma) $-component of $ \SectionSpaceAbb{J} $ to zero, the Hamiltonian constraint results from $ \difpFrac{\SectionSpaceAbb{L}}{\ell} = 0 $. As a consequence, the diffeomorphism constraint is a real momentum map constraint.
Related to these facts is the observation that the Hamiltonian constraint fails to generate a Lie algebra [@BergmannKomar1972] although the lapse function is of course an element of the Lie algebra of vector fields on $ M $. Recently, @BlohmannFernandesWeinstein2013 argued that the correct algebraic setting incorporating the full symmetry of Einstein’s equation is that of groupoids and algebroids. It would hence be interesting to extend the Clebsch–Lagrange variational principle from Lie group actions to actions of Lie groupoids.
Hamiltonian picture
-------------------
Finally, let us briefly discuss the Hamiltonian picture. According to the Clebsch–Hamiltonian $ \SectionSpaceAbb{H}: \CotBundle \MetricSpace(\Sigma) \times \mathrm{L} \SectionSpaceAbb{G} \to \R $ is given as the Legendre transform $$\SectionSpaceAbb{H}(g, \pi, S, \ell) = \dualPair{\pi}{h} - \SectionSpaceAbb{L}(g, h, S, \ell),$$ where $ h \in \SymTensorFieldSpace^2(\Sigma) $ is defined as a function of $ (g, \pi, S, \ell) $ via the relation $ \pi = \difpFrac{\SectionSpaceAbb{L}}{h} (g, h, S, \ell) $. By , we have $$h^\flat = 2 \ell \bar{\pi} - \ell \tr_g \bar{\pi} \, \tr_g (\cdot),$$ where $ \bar{\pi} \cdot \vol_g = \pi $. Hence, we obtain $$\SectionSpaceAbb{H}(g, \pi, S, \ell)
= \int_\Sigma \ell \left( \norm{\bar{\pi}}^2_{g} - \RicScalar_{g} - \frac{1}{2} (\tr_{g} \bar{\pi})^2\right) \, \vol_{g}.$$ A straightforward calculation shows that the Clebsch–Hamilton equations relative to this Hamiltonian yield the Einstein equation in its dynamical $ (1+3) $-form. More precisely, the dynamical equations coincide with standard dynamical equations of general relativity, see [@Wald1984 Equation E.2.35 and E.2.36], and the constraint equations yield the momentum and Hamiltonian constraints as in the standard ADM formalism, see [@Wald1984 Equation E.2.34 and E.2.33].
To establish the connection with the ADM formalism, we follow the discussion in \[Ham-Pic-gen\] and introduce the extended configuration space by $$\SectionSpaceAbb{Q}_\ext \defeq \MetricSpace(\Sigma) \times \VectorFieldSpace(\Sigma) \times \sFunctionSpace(\Sigma),$$ whose elements are denoted by $ (g, S, l) $. The moment map constraints cut out the following subset of the extended phase space $ \CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q}_\ext $: $$\SectionSpaceAbb{M}_1 \equiv \CotBundle \MetricSpace(\Sigma) \times \VectorFieldSpace(\Sigma) \times \sFunctionSpace(\Sigma) \times \set{0} \times \set{0}.$$ We will denote elements of $ \SectionSpaceAbb{M}_1 $ by $ (g, \pi, S, l) $. By , the extended Hamiltonian on $ \SectionSpaceAbb{M}_1 $ is given by $$\begin{split}
\SectionSpaceAbb{H}_\ext(g, \pi, S, l)
&= \SectionSpaceAbb{H}(g, \pi, S, l) - \kappa\bigl(\SectionSpaceAbb{J}(g, \pi), (S, l)\bigr)\,
\\
&= \int_\Sigma \ell \left( \norm{\bar{\pi}}^2_{g} - \RicScalar_{g} - \frac{1}{2} (\tr_{g} \bar{\pi})^2\right) \vol_g - 2 g(\divergence_g \bar{\pi}, S) \vol_g.
\end{split}$$ In the presence of a boundary this Hamiltonian will be modified by boundary terms, see [@Blau2018 Equation 20.173]. Note that $ \SectionSpaceAbb{H}_\ext $ is the usual Hamiltonian in the ADM formalism (, [@ArnowittDeserMisner1959; @Giulini2015 Equation 241]). According to \[Ham-Pic-gen\], Hamilton’s equations for $ \SectionSpaceAbb{H}_\ext $ coincide with the Clebsch–Hamilton equations for $ \SectionSpaceAbb{H} $ and thus with Einstein’s equation (in the $ (1+3) $-splitting). Finally, we note that both Hamiltonians $ \SectionSpaceAbb{H} $ and $ \SectionSpaceAbb{H}_\ext $ vanish on the subset cut out by the constraints . This is in accordance with the fact that there is no absolute time in general relativity. A non-vanishing Hamiltonian would generate time evolution with respect to an external time parameter leading to a violation of the general covariance of the theory. Instead, dynamics is completely governed by the constraints and evolution appears as a “gauge flow”.
Finally, let us comment on the reduction by stages procedure, see \[sec:clebschLagrange:reductionStages\]. We have seen that the physical action exhibits the symmetry group $ \SectionSpaceAbb{G} = \DiffGroup(\Sigma) \lSemiProduct \sFunctionSpace(\Sigma) $. According to the discussion in \[sec:clebschLagrange:reductionStages\], one would thus like to reduce the symmetry of the system using a symplectic reduction with respect to $ \SectionSpaceAbb{G} $. We should note, however, that in \[sec:clebschLagrange:reductionStages\] we made the assumption that the Lagrangian does not explicitly depend on the $ \xi $-variables. This assumption does not hold for general relativity as $ \SectionMapAbb{L} $ depends on $ \ell $. Nonetheless, as a first step, one can restrict attention to the $ \DiffGroup(\Sigma) $-subgroup and pass to the symplectic quotient $ \CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} \sslash \DiffGroup(\Sigma) $. Up to a delicate discussion of the singular strata of the $\DiffGroup(\Sigma)$-action, the latter quotient coincides with the cotangent bundle of the superspace of Wheeler. This reduction procedure corresponds to implementing the momentum map constraint. It appears that the Hamiltonian constraint does not admit a similar interpretation in terms of a symplectic reduction.
In contrast to our approach, @FischerMarsden1972 have taken the extended configuration space $ \MetricSpace(\Sigma) \times \SectionSpaceAbb{G} $ as the starting point of a geometric analysis of the Einstein equation as a Lagrangian system. Note that passing from $ \mathrm{L} \SectionSpaceAbb{G} $ to $ \SectionSpaceAbb{G} $ completely changes the role of the shift vector field and the lapse function: in our approach they are configuration variables whereas in [@FischerMarsden1972] they are generalized velocities.
Appendix: (1+3)-decomposition of the Yang–Mills–Higgs system {#sec:yangMillsHiggs:decomposition}
============================================================
In this section, we determine the $ (1+3) $-decomposition of the Yang–Mills–Higgs system and of the objects involved using a coordinate-independent, geometric language.
#### Slicing:
Let us assume that the spacetime $ (M, \eta) $ is globally hyperbolic and time-oriented. Then, there exists a $3$-dimensional manifold $\Sigma$ and a diffeomorphism $ \iota: \R \times \Sigma \to M $ such that $$\label{eq:splitting:metric}
\iota^* \eta = - \ell(t)^2 \dif t^2 + g(t),$$ where $ \ell $ is a smooth time-dependent positive function on $ \Sigma $ and $ g $ is a time-dependent Riemannian metric on $ \Sigma $, see [@BarGinouxEtAl2007 Theorem 1.3.10]. For every $ t \in \R $, we denote by $ \iota_t: \Sigma \to M $ the induced embedding and by $ \Sigma_t $ the image of $ \Sigma $ under $ \iota_t $. The submanifold $\Sigma_t$ is a Cauchy hypersurface at $t$. In what follows, we assume $\Sigma$ to be compact and without boundary.
Following [@GotayIsenbergMarsden2004 Section 6A], a of $ P $ over $ \iota $ is a principal $ G $-bundle $ \vec{\pi}: \vec{P} \to \Sigma $ and a principal bundle isomorphism $ \hat{\iota} $ fitting into the following diagram:
& P\
& M.
By [@Husemoller1966 Corollary 4.9.7] such a slicing always exists for small times; which suffices for the study of the initial value problem. In order to simplify the presentation, let us assume that the slicing exists for all $ t \in \R $.
#### Decomposition of the objects:
Since the Yang–Mills–Higgs equations are functorial, we may suppress the bundle isomorphism $ \hat{\iota} $ and restrict attention to the case $ P = \R \times \vec{P} $ and $ M = \R \times \Sigma $. Let $ \difp_t $ be the canonical timelike vector field on $ M $ determined by the splitting. With a slight abuse of notation, we will denote the time vector field on $ P $ by $ \difp_t $, too. Using this notation, the tangent bundles to $ M $ and $ P $ split into timelike and spacelike directions as follows: $$\begin{aligned}
\TBundle_{t,x} M &\isomorph \R \, \difp_t \oplus \TBundle_x \Sigma, \\
\TBundle_{t,p} P &\isomorph \R \, \difp_t \oplus \TBundle_p \vec{P}. \label{eq:splitting:P}\end{aligned}$$ These decompositions yield decompositions of the geometric objects living on $ \Sigma $ and $ P $, respectively. For example, a vector field on $ M $ decomposes into $ X = X^0 \, \difp_t + \vec{X} $, where $ X^0(t) \in \sFunctionSpace(\Sigma) $ and $ \vec{X}(t) \in \sSectionSpace(\TBundle \Sigma ) $ for every $ t $. The complex of differential forms on $ M $ refines to a bigraded complex $ \DiffFormSpace^{\cdot, \cdot}(M) $. Indeed, we can write an arbitrary $ k $-form $ \alpha $ as $$\label{eq:splitting:diffForm}
\alpha = \alpha_0 \wedge \dif t + \vec{\alpha},$$ with $ \alpha_0(t) \in \DiffFormSpace^{k-1}(\Sigma) $ and $ \vec{\alpha}(t) \in \DiffFormSpace^k(\Sigma) $. A similar decomposition holds for differential forms with values in an associated bundle $ F = P \times_G \FibreBundleModel{F} $. In this case, $ \alpha_0 $ and $ \vec{\alpha} $ are time-dependent differential forms on $ \Sigma $ with values in the bundle $ \vec{F} = \vec{P} \times_G \FibreBundleModel{F} $. In the sequel, the restriction of the differential $ \dif $ on $ M $ to $ \Sigma $ will be denoted by $ \dif_\Sigma $. A similar notation is used for the submanifold $ \vec{P} \subset P $. A straightforward calculation shows that the exterior differential of $ \alpha \in \DiffFormSpace^k(\Sigma) $ decomposes as $$\label{eq:splitting:decomposeExtDiff}
\dif \alpha = \left(\dif_\Sigma \alpha_0 + (-1)^k \, \dot{\vec{\alpha}}\right) \wedge \dif t + \dif_\Sigma \vec{\alpha},$$ where the time-dependent $ k $-form $ \dot{\vec{\alpha}} $ on $ \Sigma $ is defined by $$\dot{\vec{\alpha}} (X_1, \ldots, X_k) \defeq \difp_t (\vec{\alpha}(X_1, \ldots, X_k))$$ for $ X_i \in \TBundle \Sigma $. A connection $ A $ in $ P $ can be seen as a $ G $-equivariant $ 1 $-form on $ P $ with values in $ \LieA{g} $ and thus, by , decomposes as $$A = A_0 \dif t + \vec{A}$$ into $ A_0(t) \in \sSectionSpace(\AdBundle \vec{P}) $ and a time-dependent connection $ \vec{A}(t) $ in $ \vec{P} $. Clearly, $ A_0 = A(\difp_t) $ has the geometric meaning of measuring how much $ \difp_t $ fails to be horizontal with respect to $ A $. The horizontal lift $ X^A_{t,p} $ of a vector $ X = X^0(t) \difp_t + \vec{X}(t) \in \TBundle_{t,x} M $ to the point $ (t,p) \in P $ has the form $$X^A_{t,p} = X^0(t) \, \difp_t + \bigl(\vec{X}^{\vec{A}}_p(t) - X^0(t) \, A_0(t,p) \ldot p\bigr),$$ where $ \vec{X}^{\vec{A}}(t) $ denotes the horizontal lift of $ \vec{X}(t) $ with respect to the induced connection $ \vec{A}(t) $ in $ \vec{P} $. Indeed, $ X^A_{t,p} $ is clearly a lift of $ X_{t,x} $ and, since $ A(X^A) = X^0 A_0 + 0 - X^0 A_0 = 0 $, it is horizontal.
Let us compute the decomposition of the covariant exterior differential. Recall that, for every $ \alpha \in \DiffFormSpace^k(M, F) $, there exists a unique horizontal $ k $-form $ \tilde{\alpha} \in \DiffFormSpace^k(P, \FibreBundleModel{F})^G $ that projects onto $ \alpha $. Similarly to the reasoning above, every $ G $-equivariant form $ \tilde{\alpha} \in \DiffFormSpace^k(P, \FibreBundleModel{F})^G $ can be written as a sum, $$\tilde{\alpha} = \tilde{\alpha}_0 \wedge \dif t + \vec{\tilde{\alpha}},$$ where $ \tilde{\alpha}_0(t) \in \DiffFormSpace^{k-1}(\vec{P}, \FibreBundleModel{F})^G $ and $ \vec{\tilde{\alpha}}(t) \in \DiffFormSpace^k(\vec{P}, \FibreBundleModel{F})^G $. Decomposing $ \dif \tilde{\alpha} $ similarly to , we calculate $$\begin{split}
\dif_A \tilde{\alpha}
&= \dif \tilde{\alpha} + A \wedgeldot \tilde{\alpha}
\\
&= \left(\dif_{\vec{P}} \, \tilde{\alpha}_0 + (-1)^k \, \dot{\vec{\tilde{\alpha}}}\right) \wedge \dif t + \dif_{\vec{P}} \, \vec{\tilde{\alpha}} + (A_0 \dif t + \vec{A}) \wedgeldot (\tilde{\alpha}_0 \wedge \dif t + \vec{\tilde{\alpha}})
\\
&= \left(\dif_{\vec{A}} \tilde{\alpha}_0 + (-1)^k \, \dot{\vec{\tilde{\alpha}}} + (-1)^{k} A_0 \ldot \vec{\tilde{\alpha}}\right) \wedge \dif t + \dif_{\vec{A}} \vec{\tilde{\alpha}}.
\end{split}$$ Introducing the covariant time-derivative $ \partial_t^{A_0} \beta \defeq \dot{\beta} + A_0 \ldot \beta $ for a time-dependent $ \beta(t) \in \DiffFormSpace^k(\Sigma, \vec{F}) $, we thus find $$\label{eq:splitting:covExtDiff}
\dif_A \alpha =
\left(\dif_{\vec{A}} \alpha_0 + (-1)^k \partial_t^{A_0}\vec{\alpha}\right) \wedge \dif t + \dif_{\vec{A}} \vec{\alpha}.$$ In particular, in degree $ 0 $, a section $ \varphi \in \sSectionSpace(F) $ is the same as a time-dependent section of $ \vec{F} $, which we continue to denote by $ \varphi $. We then have $$\label{eq:splitting:covExtDiff:section}
\dif_A \varphi
= \left(\partial_t^{A_0}\varphi\right) \dif t + \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi.$$
A similar strategy also works for the decomposition of the curvature form. Indeed, the structure equation for the connection $ A = A_0 \dif t + \vec{A} $ combined with the decomposition of the exterior differential yields $$\begin{split}
F_A
&= \dif A + \frac{1}{2} \wedgeLie{A}{A}
\\
&= \left(\dif_{\vec{P}} \, A_0 - \dot{\vec{A}}\right) \wedge \dif t + \dif_{\vec{P}} \, \vec{A}
+ \frac{1}{2} \wedgeLie*{(A_0 \dif t + \vec{A})}{(A_0 \dif t + \vec{A})}
\\
&= \left(\dif_{\vec{P}} \, A_0 - \dot{\vec{A}} + \LieBracket{\vec{A}}{A_0}\right) \wedge \dif t + \dif_{\vec{P}} \, \vec{A} + \frac{1}{2} \wedgeLie{\vec{A}}{\vec{A}}
\\
&= \left(\dif_{\vec{A}} \, A_0 - \dot{\vec{A}}\right) \wedge \dif t + F_{\vec{A}}.
\end{split}$$ As usual, we introduce the time-dependent color-electric field $ E \defeq \dif_{\vec{A}} \, A_0 - \dot{\vec{A}} $ and the color-magnetic field $ B \defeq F_{\vec{A}} $. Then, the decomposition of the curvature takes the form $$\label{eq:splitting:curvature}
F_A = E \wedge \dif t + B \,.$$
We also need to decompose the Hodge-star operator $\hodgeStar$ corresponding to $\eta$. From now on, we denote it by $\hodgeStar_\eta $ as opposed to the Hodge star corresponding to the time-dependent Riemannian metric $g$, which we denote by $\hodgeStar_g $. In the usual convention (see [@RudolphSchmidt2012 Definition 4.5.1]), the Hodge star operator contains a minus sign depending on the signature of the metric: $$\begin{aligned}
{2}
\hodgeStar_\eta \alpha
&= - \alpha^{\sharp_\eta} \contr \vol_\eta,
\qquad
&&\alpha \in \DiffFormSpace^k (M)\, ,
\\
\hodgeStar_g \beta
&= \beta^{\sharp_g} \contr \vol_g,
\qquad
&&\beta \in \DiffFormSpace^l (\Sigma)\, ,\end{aligned}$$ where $ \alpha^{\sharp_\eta} $ is the $ k $-vector field associated to $ \alpha $ via the metric $ \eta $. Furthermore, we assume that $ M $ be time-oriented in such a way that $$\vol_\eta = \ell \dif t \wedge \vol_{g},$$ where the lapse function $ l(t) $ was introduced in . Let $ \beta(t) \in \DiffFormSpace^k(\Sigma) $ be a time-dependent $ k $-form on $ \Sigma $. Since the metric $ \eta $ has positive signature in the spacelike directions, we have $ \beta^{\sharp_\eta} = \beta^{\sharp_{g}} $. Thus, we obtain $$\begin{split}
\hodgeStar_\eta \beta
&= - \beta^{\sharp_\eta} \contr \vol_\eta
\\
&= - \beta^{\sharp_g} \contr (\ell \dif t \wedge \vol_g)
\\
&= (-1)^{k+1} \ell \dif t \wedge (\beta^{\sharp_g} \contr \vol_g)
\\
&= (-1)^{k+1} \ell \dif t \wedge \hodgeStar_g \beta
\\
&= \ell (\hodgeStar_g \beta) \wedge \dif t .
\end{split}$$ Take $ \alpha = \alpha_0 \wedge \dif t +
\vec{\alpha} \in \DiffFormSpace^k(M, F) $. Using the identity $ \hodgeStar_\eta \, (\beta \wedge \dif t) = (\dif t)^{\sharp_\eta} \contr \hodgeStar_\eta \beta $ and $ (\dif t)^{\sharp_\eta} = - \ell^{-2} \difp_t $, we find $$\label{eq:splitting:hodgeStar}\begin{split}
\hodgeStar_\eta \alpha
&= - \ell^{-2}\difp_t \contr (\hodgeStar_{\eta} \alpha_0) + \hodgeStar_\eta \vec{\alpha}
\\
&= - \ell^{-2}\difp_t \contr (\ell (\hodgeStar_g \alpha_0) \wedge \dif t ) + \ell (\hodgeStar_g \vec{\alpha}) \wedge \dif t
\\
&= (-1)^{k+1} \ell^{-1} \hodgeStar_g \alpha_0 + \ell (\hodgeStar_g \vec{\alpha}) \wedge \dif t .
\end{split}$$
Finally, let us determine the decomposition of the diamond product defined in . Let $ \alpha \in \DiffFormSpace^k(M, F) $, $ \beta \in \DiffFormSpace^{4-r-k}(M, F^*) $ and $ \xi \in \DiffFormSpace^r(M, \AdBundle P) $. Decomposing these objects with respect to , we obtain $$\begin{split}
&\wedgeDual{\xi}{(\alpha \diamond \beta)}
\\
&= \wedgeDual{(\xi \wedgeldot \alpha)}{\beta}
\\
&= \wedgeDual{\left((\xi_0 \dif t + \vec{\xi}) \wedgeldot (\alpha_0 \wedge \dif t + \vec{\alpha})\right)}{\left(\beta_0 \wedge \dif t + \vec{\beta}\right)}
\\
&= \wedgeDual{(\xi_0 \dif t \wedgeldot \vec{\alpha})}{\vec{\beta}}
+ (-1)^{k+r} \wedgeDual{(\vec{\xi} \wedgeldot \alpha_0)}{\vec{\beta}} \wedge \dif t
+ \wedgeDual{(\vec{\xi} \wedgeldot \vec{\alpha})}{\beta_0} \wedge \dif t
\\
&= \wedgeDual{\xi_0 \dif t}{(\vec{\alpha} \diamond_\Sigma \vec{\beta})}
+ \wedgeDual{\vec{\xi}}{\left((-1)^{k+r} \, \alpha_0 \diamond_\Sigma \vec{\beta} + \vec{\alpha} \diamond_\Sigma \beta_0\right)} \wedge \dif t
\\
&= \wedgeDual{\xi}{\left(\vec{\alpha} \diamond_\Sigma \vec{\beta} + ((-1)^{k+r} \, \alpha_0 \diamond_\Sigma \vec{\beta} + \vec{\alpha} \diamond_\Sigma \beta_0) \wedge \dif t \right)},
\end{split}$$ where $ \diamond_\Sigma $ denotes the diamond operation on $ \Sigma $. Hence, for $ \alpha \in \DiffFormSpace^k(M, F) $ and $ \beta \in \DiffFormSpace^{4-r-k}(M, F^*) $, $$\label{eq:splitting:diamondProd}
\alpha \diamond \beta = \left((-1)^{k+r} \, \alpha_0 \diamond_\Sigma \vec{\beta} + \vec{\alpha} \diamond_\Sigma \beta_0\right) \wedge \dif t + \vec{\alpha} \diamond_\Sigma \vec{\beta}.$$
#### Decomposition of the equations of motion:
We now turn our attention to the Yang–Mills–Higgs equations. Using the decomposition of the Hodge operator , of the curvature and of the exterior differential , the Lagrangian can be written as: $$\label{eq:splitting:lagrangian}\begin{split}
L(A, \varphi)
&= \frac{1}{2} \wedgeDual{F_A}{\hodgeStar_\eta F_A} + \frac{1}{2} \wedgeDual{\dif_A \varphi}{\hodgeStar_\eta \dif_A \varphi} - V(\varphi) \vol_\eta
\\
&= \frac{1}{2} \wedgeDual{\bigl(E \wedge \dif t + B\bigr)}{\bigl(-\ell^{-1}\hodgeStar_g E + \ell (\hodgeStar_g B) \wedge \dif t\bigr)}
\\
&\quad + \frac{1}{2} \wedgeDual{\bigl((\partial_t^{A_0} \varphi) \, \dif t + \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi\bigr)}{\bigl(\ell^{-1} \hodgeStar_g (\partial_t^{A_0} \varphi) + \ell (\hodgeStar_g \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi) \wedge \dif t\bigr)} \\
&\quad - \ell \, V(\varphi) \dif t \wedge \vol_g
\\
&= \dif t \wedge \bigg(\frac{1}{2 \ell} \wedgeDual{E}{\hodgeStar_{g} E} - \frac{\ell}{2}\wedgeDual{B}{\hodgeStar_g B}
\\
&\hphantom{{}=\dif t \wedge } \quad + \frac{1}{2 \ell} \wedgeDual{\partial_t^{A_0} \varphi}{\hodgeStar_g \partial_t^{A_0} \varphi} - \frac{\ell}{2} \wedgeDual{\dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi}{\hodgeStar_g \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi} - \ell \, V(\varphi) \vol_g \bigg).
\end{split}$$
Now, the decomposition of the field equations may be accomplished either by taking the variation of this action or by directly inserting the above decompositions of the fields into the covariant field equations . The first approach is the subject of \[sec:yangMillls:asClebschLagrange\] and, here, we take the second, more direct option.
\[prop:splitting:yangMillsHiggs\] The Yang–Mills–Higgs equations decompose into
\[eq:splitting:yangMillsHiggs3dEvol\]
\_ (\_g B) - \_t\^[A\_0]{} (\^[-1]{} \_[g]{} E) &= - \_(\_g \_ ), \[eq:splitting:yangMillsHiggs3d:evol:ampere\]\
\_ (\^[-1]{} \_[g]{} E) &= \^[-1]{} \_(\_g \_t\^[A\_0]{} ), \[eq:splitting:yangMillsHiggs3dConstraint\]\
- \_t\^[A\_0]{} (\^[-1]{} \_g \_t\^[A\_0]{} ) + \_ (\_g \_ ) &= V’ ()\_g . \[eq:splitting:yangMillsHiggs3d:evol:higgs\]
Using the decomposition formulae for the covariant exterior derivative and for the Hodge operator , we calculate
$$\begin{aligned}
\begin{split}
\dif_A \hodgeStar_\eta F_A
&= \dif_A \hodgeStar_\eta (E \wedge \dif t + B)
\\
&= \dif_A \left(\ell (\hodgeStar_g B) \wedge \dif t - \ell^{-1} \hodgeStar_g E \right)
\\
&= \left(\dif_{\vec{A}} (\ell \hodgeStar_g B) - \partial_t^{A_0} (\ell^{-1} \hodgeStar_{g} E)\right) \wedge \dif t - \dif_{\vec{A}} (\ell^{-1} \hodgeStar_{g} E),
\end{split}
\intertext{Similarly, using~\eqref{eq:splitting:diamondProd}, we find}
\begin{split}
\varphi \diamond \hodgeStar_\eta \dif_A \varphi
&= \varphi \diamond \hodgeStar_\eta \left((\partial_t^{A_0} \varphi) \, \dif t + \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi\right)
\\
&= \varphi \diamond \bigl(\ell^{-1} \hodgeStar_g \partial_t^{A_0} \varphi + \ell (\hodgeStar_g \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi) \wedge \dif t\bigr)
\\
&= \ell^{-1} \, \varphi \diamond_\Sigma (\hodgeStar_g \partial_t^{A_0} \varphi) + \ell \bigl(\varphi \diamond_\Sigma (\hodgeStar_g \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi)\bigr) \wedge \dif t .
\end{split}\end{aligned}$$
Comparing these equations with , we obtain and . Finally, $$\begin{split}
\dif_A \hodgeStar_\eta \dif_A \varphi
&= \dif_A (\ell^{-1} \hodgeStar_g \partial_t^{A_0} \varphi + \ell \hodgeStar_g \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi \wedge \dif t)
\\
&= \left(- \partial_t^{A_0} (\ell^{-1} \hodgeStar_g \partial_t^{A_0} \varphi) + \dif_{\vec{A}} (\ell \hodgeStar_g \dif_{\vec{A}} \varphi) \right) \wedge \dif t
\end{split}$$ shows that is equivalent to the evolution equation for the Higgs field.
Using and , the Bianchi identity for $ A $ reads: $$0 = \dif_A F_A
= \left(\dif_{\vec{A}} E + \partial_t^{A_0}B\right) \wedge \dif t + \dif_{\vec{A}} B.$$ This implies Faraday’s law and the Bianchi identity for $ \vec{A} $: $$\begin{aligned}
\dif_{\vec{A}} E + \partial_t^{A_0} B &= 0,
\label{eq:yangMillsHiggs3d:evol:faraday}
\\
\dif_{\vec{A}} B &= 0.
\label{eq:yangMillsHiggs3d:evol:bianchi}
\end{aligned}$$ Note that this set of equations together with and constitute the non-abelian counterpart of Maxwell’s equations (coupled to matter).
[^1]: For example, we may take $ \CotBundle Q $ to be $ \TBundle Q $ and the pairing given by a Riemannian structure on $ Q $. In applications, the fiber of $ \TBundle Q $ is often a space of mappings so that a convenient choice of the cotangent bundle consists of regular distributions inside the space of all distributions.
[^2]: More generally, one could give up the assumption of the existence of a local addition and instead work in the diffeological category [@Iglesias-Zemmour2013].
[^3]: That is, $ \tangent_{\gamma(t_0)} C \bigl(\dot{\gamma}(t_0)\bigr) = 0 $.
[^4]: Here, we have used the identity $ (\LieA{g} \ldot (q, p))^{\omega \omega} = \LieA{g} \ldot (q, p) $, which in infinite dimensions requires additional assumptions of functional-analytic nature. For a precise formulation of the bifurcation lemma in an infinite-dimensional context see [@DiezThesis].
[^5]: To be more precise, the reduction by stages theorem [@MarsdenMisiolekEtAl2007 Theorem 4.2.2] is formulated for the free and proper action of a finite-dimensional group on a finite-dimensional phase space. Nonetheless, the peculiarities of our infinite-dimensional setting can be handled easily due to the simple form of the first reduction.
[^6]: This one-to-one correspondence will be used throughout the text without further notice.
[^7]: The diamond operator often occurs in the study of Lie–Poisson systems and this is were we borrowed the notation from. Note that in a purely algebraic setting, the diamond product boils down to a map $ \diamond: F \times F^* \to \LieA{g}^* $ dual to the Lie algebra action. Hence, it is a momentum map for the $ G $-action on $ \CotBundle F $. For example, if we consider the action of $ G = \SOGroup(3) $ on $ F = \R^3 $ and identify $ F^* $ with $ \R^3 $, then the diamond product becomes the classical cross product.
[^8]: Equivalently, one can view $ \vec{A} $ as a global coordinate function $ \CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} \to \DiffFormSpace^1(\Sigma, \AdBundle \vec{P}) $ and $ \diF $ as the exterior differential on $ \CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q} $. In this language, $ \diF \vec{A} \in \DiffFormSpace^1(\CotBundle \SectionSpaceAbb{Q}, \DiffFormSpace^1(\Sigma, \AdBundle \vec{P})) $ and then $$\theta = \dualPair{D}{\diF \vec{A}} + \dualPair{\pi}{\diF \varphi},
\quad
\Omega = \wedgeDual{\diF D}{\diF \vec{A}} + \wedgeDual{\diF \pi}{\diF \varphi}$$ are the field theoretic counterparts of the formulae $ \theta = p_i \dif q^i $ and $ \Omega = \dif p_i \wedge \dif q^i $ in classical mechanics.
[^9]: We refer to [@Blau2018 Chapter 20] for a detailed discussion of boundary terms within the ADM formalism and to [@Kijowski1997] for a new canonical description of the gravitational field dynamics in a finite volume with boundary. Clearly, our approach can be adapted to include boundary terms as well.
[^10]: $ \eta(\nu, \nu) = -1 $.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'Given a compact set $K$ one may define a transfinite diameter for $K$ via a limiting process involving maximising a Vandermonde determinant over $K$ with respect to a monomial basis. Different transfinite diameters may be obtained by using different polynomial bases in the Vandermonde determinant calculation. We show that if these bases are sufficiently similar that the transfinite diameter of $K$ is unchanged. Utilising this result we show that the transfinite diameters defined by Cox-Ma‘u and Berman-Boucksom for algebraic varieties are equal.'
author:
- Jesse Hart
title: Relations between Transfinite Diameters on Affine Algebraic Varieties
---
Introduction
============
The transfinite diameter of a compact set $K$ is an interesting constant within pluripotential theory due to the fact that it is related to other seemingly unrelated constants such as Chebyshev constants and logarithmic capacity. In ${\mathbb{C}}$ these relationships have been well understood for some time while it wasn’t until Rumely [@Rumely07] and Berman-Boucksom [@Berman08; @Berman10; @Berman11] that these relationships were well understood in ${\mathbb{C}}^M$. Essential to the definition of a transfinite diameter is the evaluation of a Vandermonde determinant with respect to some polynomial basis. In ${\mathbb{C}}^M$ this basis is taken to be the monomial basis while in the setting of a complex manifold Berman-Boucksom chose a $\mu$-orthonormal basis where $\mu$ is a probability measure.\
\
Studying transfinite diameters in the setting of an algebraic variety ${\mathcal{V}}$ is in some sense a midway point between ${\mathbb{C}}^M$ and a complex manifold. The variety inherits enough structure from ${\mathbb{C}}^M$ in order to show convergence of the transfinite diameter limit in an analogous way, but can also be viewed as a complex manifold (possibly with singularities) so one could use a complex geometric approach to show convergence. Both these approaches have been studied, the former by Cox-Ma‘u [@Mau11; @CoxMau15] and the latter by Berman-Boucksom [@Berman08; @Berman10]. While these transfinite diameters are defined in similar ways the precise relationship between the two approaches has not yet been clarified.\
\
This paper establishes that with an appropriate probability measure these approaches yield the same transfinite diameter under mild geometric hypothesis. The first step towards showing this is establishing a general technical theorem relating transfinite diameters defined by bases which are sufficiently similar, which we call [*compliant bases*]{} (Definition \[compliant\]).
Let ${\mathcal{V}}$ be an affine algebraic variety of pure dimension $M$, $K\subset {\mathcal{V}}$ a compact set, and suppose that ${\mathcal{B}}$ and ${\mathcal{C}}$ are compliant graded bases for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$. If the limit $$\log d^{\mathcal{B}}(K)=\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty} \frac{1}{l_k} \log\|VDM[{\mathcal{B}}_k]\|_{L^\infty(K)}$$ exists, then $$\log d^{{\mathcal{C}}}(K)=\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty} \frac{1}{l_k} \log\|VDM[{\mathcal{C}}_k]\|_{L^\infty(K)}$$ exists. Moreover, $d^{\mathcal{B}}(K) = d^{{\mathcal{C}}}(K)$.
Equipped with this result we show the desired equality of approaches by showing that the basis used in each approach is compliant with the usual monomial basis the algebraic variety. For the Cox-ma‘u approach this is done in Proposition \[cmmcompliant\] while the Berman-Boucksom approach is done in Proposition \[bbcompliant\] where the ‘appropriate’ probability measure is $\nu=({dd^c}V_{T_{\mathcal{V}}})^M$ (Proposition \[cxon\]). With these propositions the following corollary is immediate.
Let ${\mathcal{V}}$ be an affine algebraic variety with distinct intersections with infinity and Noether presentation $(x,y)$. If $K\subset {\mathcal{V}}$ is a compact set then $$d^{cm}(K) = d^{bb}_\nu(K).$$
The work of Berman-Boucksom uses a slightly different definition to what has been standard. The relation between the two is a constant depending only on the dimension of the variety.
Let ${\mathcal{V}}$ be an algebraic variety, $K\subset{\mathcal{V}}$ a compact set, and $\nu$ a probability measure on ${\mathcal{V}}$. If $S_k$ is an orthonormal basis for ${\mathbb{C}}_{k}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ then $$\frac{M+1}{M}\log d^{bb}_\nu(K) = \lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}\frac{1}{kN_k}\log\|VDM[S_k]\|_{L^{\infty}(K)}.$$
The limit on the right hand side is the original formulation of Berman-Boucksom.\
\
The paper is structured as follows: Section 2 is a brief overview of the necessary preliminary information for this paper, Section 3 contains the proof of the main technical theorem in the paper, Section 4 utilises our main theorem to relate $d^{cm}(K)$ and $d^{bb}_\nu(K)$, Section 5 shows how $d^{bb}_\nu(K)$ is related to the original formulation of Berman-Boucksom, and Section 6 is a worked example illustrating the equality.
Notation
--------
Let ${\mathcal{V}}$ be an affine algebraic variety of pure dimension $M$. We employ the following notational conventions.
- [${\mathbb{Z}}_{\geq 0}$ is the set of nonnegative integers, and ${\mathbb{Z}}^M_{\geq0}$ is the set of $M$-tuples of nonnegative integers. ]{}
- If a polynomial ordering is not stated, it is assumed that the ordering used is grevlex. Precisely, if $\alpha,\beta\in{\mathbb{Z}}^N_{\geq 0}$ then $\alpha \succ_{grevlex} \beta$ if
- [$|\alpha|>|\beta|$, or;]{}
- [$|\alpha|=|\beta|$ and $\alpha_{N-j}>\beta_{N-j}$ for the first index $j\in{\mathbb{Z}}_{\geq 0}$ for which $\alpha_{N-j}\neq\beta_{N-j}$.]{}
- [${{\bf I}}({\mathcal{V}})$ denotes the ideal generated by ${\mathcal{V}}$. If $p_1,...,p_s$ is a collection of polynomials then ${{\bf V}}(p_1,...,p_s)$ is the variety defined by the common zero set of $p_1,...,p_s$.]{}
- [Given a polynomial $p$ and a monomial ordering, ${\textsc{lt}}(p)$ is the term of the polynomial with maximum degree with respect to this ordering. The ideal ${\langle}{\textsc{lt}}(I({\mathcal{V}})){\rangle}$ is the ideal generated by the terms $${\textsc{lt}}(I({\mathcal{V}})) = \{cz^\alpha : \text{these exists }p\in I({\mathcal{V}})\text{ such that }{\textsc{lt}}(p)=cz^\alpha, \alpha\in{\mathbb{Z}}^{N}\}.$$ ]{}
- [Consider the ring of equivalence classes ${\mathbb{C}}[z]/{{\bf I}}({\mathcal{V}})$ and choose some monomial ordering. A canonical representative from an equivalence class $[p]$ is the unique element $q$ such that no term of $q$ lies in ${\langle}{\textsc{lt}}({{\bf I}}({\mathcal{V}})) {\rangle}$, we call such an element a [*normal form*]{} (Definition \[normalform\]). ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ is the set of all normal forms on ${\mathcal{V}}$ and we call this set the polynomials on ${\mathcal{V}}$.]{}
- [${\mathbb{C}}_{=k}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ are the polynomials in ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ of degree exactly $k$, and ${\mathbb{C}}_{k}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ are the polynomials in ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ of degree at most $k$.]{}
- [$N_{=k}$ is the number of monomials in ${\mathbb{C}}_{=k}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ and $N_{k}$ the number of monomials in ${\mathbb{C}}_{k}[{\mathcal{V}}]$. Equivalently, $N_{=k} = \dim({\mathbb{C}}_{=k}[{\mathcal{V}}])$ and $N_k=\dim({\mathbb{C}}_k[{\mathcal{V}}])$.]{}
- [$l_{k}=\sum_{j=1}^k jN_{=j}$, i.e. is the sum of the degrees of the monomials of degree at most $k$.]{}
- [$N_{=k}^x$ is the number of monomials in ${\mathbb{C}}_k[x]$, and $N^x_{k}$ and $l^x_{k}$ are defined similarly.]{}
- [${\mathcal{M}}[x]$ denotes the usual monomial basis for ${\mathbb{C}}[x]$, $x\in{\mathbb{C}}^M$, and ${\mathcal{M}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ denotes the usual monomial basis for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$. ${\mathcal{M}}_k[x]$ and ${\mathcal{M}}_k[{\mathcal{V}}]$ are the elements in ${\mathcal{M}}[x]$ and ${\mathcal{M}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ respectively of degree at most $k$.]{}
- [If $A$ is a collection of multi-indices in ${\mathbb{Z}}^s_{\geq 0}$ and ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}] = \bigoplus_{\alpha\in A} y^{\alpha}{\mathbb{C}}[x]$ then $a=\max_{\alpha\in A}|\alpha|$ and $n=|A|$ where $|\alpha|=\alpha_1+...+\alpha_{s}$.]{}
- [The operator ${dd^c}= \frac{i}{\pi} {\partial}{\bar{\partial}}$.]{}
Preliminaries
=============
Transfinite Diameter
--------------------
Consider an affine algebraic variety ${\mathcal{V}}$ of pure dimension $M$. Let ${\mathcal{C}}$ be a polynomial basis for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ and suppose that ${\mathcal{C}}_{k}$ are the elements of ${\mathcal{C}}$ of degree at most $k$. We say that ${\mathcal{C}}$ is a graded basis if ${\mathcal{C}}_k$ is a basis for ${\mathbb{C}}_k[{\mathcal{V}}]$ for each $k$. Suppose that ${\mathcal{C}}$ is a graded polynomial basis and let $\{e_i(z)\}_{i=1}^{s_k}$ be the elements in ${\mathcal{C}}_k$. We use the notation $$VDM_{\zeta_1,...,\zeta_{s_k}}[{\mathcal{C}}_k] = \det\begin{pmatrix} e_1(\zeta_1) & e_1(\zeta_2) & ... & e_{1}(\zeta_{s_k}) \\
e_2(\zeta_1) & e_2(\zeta_2) & ... & e_{2}(\zeta_{s_k}) \\
\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\
e_{s_k}(\zeta_1) & e_{s_k}(\zeta_2) & ... & e_{s_k}(\zeta_{s_k})
\end{pmatrix}$$ and if $K\subset{\mathcal{V}}$ is a compact set, $$\|VDM[{\mathcal{C}}_k]\|_{L^\infty(K)} = \max_{\zeta_1,...,\zeta_{s_k}\in K}\left|VDM_{\zeta_1,...,\zeta_{s_k}}[{\mathcal{C}}_k]\right|.$$ We occasionally write $VDM_{\zeta_1,...,\zeta_{s_k}}[{\mathcal{C}}_k] = VDM[{\mathcal{C}}_k]$ when the points $\zeta_1,...,\zeta_{s_k}$ are irrelevant within the context. The transfinite diameter of $K$ (with respect to the basis ${\mathcal{C}}$) is the limit $$d^{\mathcal{C}}(K)=\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty} \left(\|VDM[{\mathcal{C}}_k]\|_{L^\infty(K)}\right)^{1/l_k},$$ if the limit exists. The transfinite diameter was introduced by Fekete-Szeg[ö]{} for $K\subset{\mathbb{C}}$ as early as the 1920’s and a comprehensive study of this and associated results can be found in [@Ransford]. It is a result of Zakharjuta [@Zakharjuta75] that the above limit exists when ${\mathcal{V}}={\mathbb{C}}^N$ and ${\mathcal{C}}$ is the ordinary monomial basis.
Cox-ma‘u Transfinite Diameter
-----------------------------
The approach of Cox-ma‘u [@Mau11; @CoxMau15] is motivated by classical methods i.e. those of Zakharjuta [@Zakharjuta75]. Essential to this work is the creation of polynomials which have a sub-multiplicative property for which techniques of Zakharjuta can be used on to show the convergence of the transfinite diameter limit.
\[noether\] Let $z=(x,y)$ where $x\in{\mathbb{C}}^M$, $y\in{\mathbb{C}}^{N-M}$ and ${\mathcal{V}}$ be an affine algebraic variety. We say that ${\mathbb{C}}[x]$ is a Noether normalisation for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ if the following conditions are met.
- [${\mathbb{C}}[x]\cap {{\bf I}}({\mathcal{V}})=\{0\}$.]{}
- [${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ is finite over ${\mathbb{C}}[x]$.]{}
- [For each $1\leq i\leq N-M$, there is a $g_i\in I({\mathcal{V}})$ and $m_i\in{\mathbb{Z}}_{\geq 0}$ such that ${\textsc{lt}}(g_i) = y_i^{m_i}$.]{}
Given an algebraic variety ${\mathcal{V}}$, Theorem 2.1 [@CoxMau15] guarantees that one can always find a complex linear change of coordinates so that the three properties in Definition \[noether\] hold. The condition (iii) is not usually assumed for a Noether normalisation as it is a consequence when using the lex monomial ordering. Since the motivating monomial ordering for the work of Cox-ma‘u is the grevlex ordering we make this condition a requirement.
Let ${\mathcal{V}}\subset{\mathbb{C}}^N$ be an $M$ dimensional affine algebraic variety of pure dimension $M$ with $d$ sheets and affine coordinates $(x,y), x\in{\mathbb{C}}^M, y\in{\mathbb{C}}^{N-M}$. We say that ${\mathcal{V}}$ has distinct intersections with infinity if it satisfies the following properties.
- [${\mathbb{C}}[x]$ is a Noether normalisation for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$.]{}
- [If $P={{\bf V}}(t, x_1,..., x_{M-1})\subset{\mathbb{P}}^N$ and $${\mathcal{V}}_{{\mathbb{P}}} = \{[t:x:y]\in{\mathbb{P}}^N : t^{\deg p}p\left(\frac{x}{t},\frac{y}{t}\right) = 0,\, \forall p\in {{\bf I}}({\mathcal{V}})\}$$ where $x=(x_1,...,x_{M})$ and $y=(y_1,...,y_{N-M})$. Then $P\cap {\mathcal{V}}_{\mathbb{P}}$ consists of $d$ points $\lambda_1,...,\lambda_d$.]{}
- [If $\lambda_i = [0:...:0:\lambda_{ix_M}:\lambda_{iy_{1}}...:\lambda_{iy_{N-M}}]$ then $\lambda_{ix_M}\neq 0$ for each $i$.]{}
\[example2.2\] Consider ${\mathcal{V}}={{\bf V}}(x^2-y^2-1)$ which is a 1 dimensional affine algebraic variety with two sheets. Since $y^2=x^2-1$ it follows that $${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}] = y{\mathbb{C}}[x] + {\mathbb{C}}[x]$$ so ${\mathbb{C}}[x]$ is a Noether normalisation for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$. ${\mathcal{V}}_{\mathbb{P}}= {{\bf V}}(x^2-y^2-t^2)$ so $$P\cap {\mathcal{V}}_{\mathbb{P}}= \{[t:x:y]\in{\mathbb{P}}^2 : t=0, x^2-y^2=0\}=\{\{[0:1:1], [0:1:-1]\}.$$ It follows that ${\mathcal{V}}$ has distinct intersections with infinity.
Consider ${\mathcal{V}}={{\bf V}}((x+y)^2+x+y-1)$ which is a 1 dimensional affine algebraic variety with two sheets. Then $${\mathbb{C}}[V] = y{\mathbb{C}}[x]+{\mathbb{C}}[x]$$ is a Noether normalisation for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$. ${\mathcal{V}}_{\mathbb{P}}= {{\bf V}}((x+y)^2+tx+ty-t^2)$ so $$P\cap {\mathcal{V}}_{\mathbb{P}}= \{[t:x:y]\subset{\mathbb{P}}^2 : t=0, (x+y)^2 = 0\} = \{[0:1:-1]\}.$$ It follows that ${\mathcal{V}}$ does not have distinct intersections with infinity.
\[normalform\] Fix a monomial ordering on ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$. If $p\in{\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ then the normal form of $p$, denoted $[p]$, is the unique polynomial representative in ${\mathbb{C}}[z]/{{\bf I}}({\mathcal{V}})$ which contains no monomials in the ideal ${\langle}{\textsc{lt}}({{\bf I}}({\mathcal{V}})){\rangle}$.[^1] If $p,q\in{\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ then we define $p*q := [pq]$.
In [@CoxMau15] it was shown that under the mild geometric condition of distinct intersections with infinity that one can show the convergence of the transfinite diameter limit for algebraic varieties in an analogous way to ${\mathbb{C}}^M$. Their main results are summarised in the following two results.
\[coxmaulem\] Suppose that ${\mathcal{V}}$ is a pure $M$-dimensional affine algebraic variety with distinct intersections with infinity. For some $t\in{\mathbb{N}}$ sufficiently large there are polynomials $v_1,...v_d\in{\mathbb{C}}_{=t}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ satisfying the following properties.
- [$v_i*v_i = x_M^{2t} + \sum_{k=1}^{M-1} x_kh_k + h_0$ with $\deg(h_k)\leq 2t-1$ for each $k=0, ..., M-1$.]{}
- [$v_i*v_j = \sum_{k=1}^{M-1} x_kq_k + q_0$ if $i\neq j$ with $\deg(q_k)\leq 2t-1$ for each $k$.]{}
- [${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ is spanned by $$\begin{aligned}
(\star)&\quad x^\beta x_M^l*y^\alpha, &&\beta\in{\mathbb{Z}}^{M-1}_{\geq0}, x^l_My^\alpha\in \mathcal{A}.\\
(\star\star)&\quad x^\beta x_M^l*v_i,&&\beta\in{\mathbb{Z}}^{M-1}_{\geq0}, l\geq 0, i=1,...,d.\end{aligned}$$ where $\mathcal{A} = \{x_M^ly^\alpha \not\in {\langle}{\textsc{lt}}({{\bf I}}({\mathcal{V}})){\rangle}: l+|\alpha|\leq t-1\}$. ]{}
\[remark\] In Lemma \[deglem\] we will prove that consideration of the normal forms in property (iii) of the previous lemma is unnecessary. As a consequence of this we can interpret the previous lemma as giving us a decomposition of ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ in the following way $$\begin{aligned}
{\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}] =\bigoplus_{x^l_My^\alpha\in\mathcal{A}}x^l_My^\alpha{\mathbb{C}}[x_1,...,x_{M-1}]\,\,\bigoplus_{1\leq i\leq d} v_i{\mathbb{C}}[x_1,...,x_M]\end{aligned}$$ where the $v_i$’s have convenient algebraic properties. As a result of this the collection of $(\star)$ and $(\star\star)$ elements act like a monomial basis for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ and this idea is utilised in the following theorem. Also note that $\mathcal{A}$ contains all monomials in ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ in the variables $x_M,y_1,...,y_{N-M}$ of degree at most $t-1$.
The elements from Lemma \[coxmaulem\] will be called a cm-basis for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$.
Let ${\mathcal{V}}$ be an affine algebraic variety with distinct intersections with infinity and $K$ a compact subset of ${\mathcal{V}}$. If ${\mathcal{C}}$ is a cm-basis for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ ordered by any graded ordering[^2] then the limit $$d^{cm}(K) = \lim_{k\rightarrow\infty} \left(\|VDM[{\mathcal{C}}_k]\|_{L^\infty(K)}\right)^{1/l_{k}}$$ exists.
Berman-Boucksom Transfinite Diameter
------------------------------------
As part of their breakthrough study of pluripotential on complex manifolds, Berman-Boucksom ([@Berman08; @Berman10; @Berman11]) showed that a transfinite diameter with respect to an orthonormal polynomial basis existed. The result we are interested in is rephrased in our context below.
\[bb\] Suppose that ${\mathcal{V}}$ is an affine algebraic variety of pure dimension $M$ and $E\subset{\mathcal{V}}$ a compact set. Let $\nu$ be a probability measure on $K$. Let $S_k$ be an $L^2(\nu)$-orthonormal basis for ${\mathbb{C}}_{k}[{\mathcal{V}}]$. Then for every subset $K\subset{\mathcal{V}}$ the limit $$\log d^{bb}_\nu(K)=\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty} \frac{1}{l_{k}} \log \|VDM[S_k]\|_{L^\infty(K)}$$ exists.
The original statement has $\frac{1}{l_{k}}$ replaced with $\frac{1}{kN_k}$. Relating these two formulations is purely combinatoric and the relation is clarified in Section 5. For our main theorem we need to find a particular probability measure $\nu$ which satisfies the hypothesis of Theorem \[bb\].
Let ${\mathcal{V}}$ be a pure $M$-dimensional affine algebraic variety. We say $(x,y)\in{\mathbb{C}}^{M}\times{\mathbb{C}}^{N-M}$ is a Noether presentation for ${\mathcal{V}}$ if the following conditions are satisfied.
- [${\mathbb{C}}[x]$ is a Noether normalisation for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$.]{}
- [There is a constant $C$ such that $\|y\| \leq C(1+\|x\|)$ for all $(x,y)\in {\mathcal{V}}$.]{}
Coordinates of this type were introduced in [@Hart17] and studied further in [@HartMau18]. Coordinates satisfying only the second condition have been considered by other authors including Rudin [@Rudin68] and Zeriahi [@Zeriahi96]. Such coordinates can always be constructed and explicit methods of construction are given in [@Hart17 Theorem 2.21] or [@HartMau18 Proposition 1.9]. They are coordinates for which studying pluripotential theory on affine algebraic varieties in particularly convenient. An important observation is that, with respect to these coordinates, the variety is locally bounded in the $y$ variables i.e. $\|y\|\rightarrow\infty$ if and only if $\|x\|\rightarrow\infty$.\
\
Let $\log^+|z| = \max\{\log|z|, 0\}$ for all $z\in{\mathcal{V}}$. Recall the Lelong class of plurisubharmonic (psh) functions, $${\mathcal{L}}^+({\mathcal{V}}) = \{u\in PSH({\mathcal{V}}) : \log^+\|z\|+a \leq u(z) \leq \log^+\|z\|+b, \text{for some }a,b\in{\mathbb{R}}\}.$$ Noether presentations allow for the following calculation of mass result.
\[masslem\] Suppose that ${\mathcal{V}}$ is a pure $M$-dimensional affine algebraic variety with $d$ sheets. If $u\in{\mathcal{L}}^+({\mathcal{V}})$ then $\int_{\mathcal{V}}({dd^c}u)^M = d$.
Given a Noether presentation for an affine algebraic variety ${\mathcal{V}}$ let $T_{\mathcal{V}}= \{(x,y)\in{\mathcal{V}}: |x_j|\leq 1\}$. By the previous remark about the local boundedness of ${\mathcal{V}}$, it follows that $T_{\mathcal{V}}$ is compact. Recall that the logarithmic extremal function associated to a compact set $K$ is defined by $$V_K(z) := \sup\{u(z) : u\in {\mathcal{L}}^+({\mathcal{V}}), u|_K\leq 0\}.$$
Suppose that ${\mathcal{V}}$ is a pure $M$-dimensional affine algebraic variety with $d$ sheets and suppose we have a Noether presentation $(x,y)$. Let $\nu = ({dd^c}V_{T_{\mathcal{V}}})^M/d$ with respect to these coordinates, then $\nu$ is a probability measure on ${\mathcal{V}}$.
Consider $v(x,y) = \max\{\log^+|x_1|,...,\log^+|x_{M}|\}$. Clearly $v(x,y)\leq 0$ on $T_{\mathcal{V}}$ so $v(x,y)\leq V_{T_{\mathcal{V}}}$. But $v(x,y)$ is maximal outside of $T_{\mathcal{V}}$ and so any $u\in{\mathcal{L}}^+({\mathcal{V}})$ with $u\leq V_{T_{\mathcal{V}}}$ also satisfies $u\leq v(x,y)$. It follows that $v=V_{T_{\mathcal{V}}}$ so $V_{T_{\mathcal{V}}}\in{\mathcal{L}}^+({\mathcal{V}})$ and the first claim follows from Proposition \[masslem\].
Suppose that ${\mathcal{V}}$ is a pure $M$-dimensional affine algebraic variety with $d$ sheets and suppose we have a Noether presentation $(x,y)$. Let $\nu = ({dd^c}V_{T_{\mathcal{V}}})^M/d$ with respect to these coordinates. We say that the basis ${\mathcal{B}}$ that arises from performing Gram-Schmidt on ${\mathcal{M}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ with respect to the $L^2(\nu)$-norm is a bb-basis for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$.
Relations between General Transfinite Diameters
===============================================
The following definition is motivated by the notion of a ring being finite over a subring. We want the same kind of structure but for a basis of the ring and subring.
Let $S[z]$ be a polynomial ring and ${\mathcal{B}}\subset S[z]$ some subset. We say that $E$ is a core for ${\mathcal{B}}$ if there is a pair $(A,t)$ where $A\subset S[z]$ is a finite set and $t\in{\mathbb{Z}}_{\geq0}$ such that $$\{b\in{\mathcal{B}}: \deg(b) \geq t\} = \{ae : e\in E, a\in A\}$$ and $E$ is closed under multiplication.
The following examples are fundamental.
\[ex1\]Suppose that ${\mathcal{V}}={{\bf V}}(y^2-x^2-1)$. Then ${\mathbb{C}}[x]$ is a Noether normalisation for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$. The monomials in ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ are given by $\{ x^n, x^ny : n\in{\mathbb{Z}}_{\geq0}\}$. Then ${\mathcal{M}}[x]$ is a core for ${\mathcal{M}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ where $t=0$ and the finite set is $A=\{1,y\}$.
\[ex2\] Suppose that ${\mathcal{V}}={{\bf V}}(y^2-x^2-1)$. The $v$ polynomials from Lemma \[coxmaulem\] are given by $$v_1(x,y) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(y+x), \qquad v_2(x,y) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(y-x).$$ Then the set $\{1, x^nv_1(x,y), x^nv_2(x,y) : n\in{\mathbb{Z}}_{\geq0}\}$ has ${\mathcal{M}}[x]$ as a core where $t=1$ and the finite set is $A=\{v_1,v_2\}$.
\[ex3\] Suppose that ${\mathcal{V}}={{\bf V}}(y^2-x_2^2-x_1^2-1)$. Then the $v_i$ polynomials from Lemma \[coxmaulem\] are given by $$v_1(x_1,x_2,y) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(y+x_2), \qquad v_2(x_1,x_2,y) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(y-x_2).$$ Then the corresponding spanning set from this Lemma is the set $$\{x_1^n, x_1^nx_2^mv_1, x_1^nx_2^mv_2 : n,m\in{\mathbb{Z}}_{\geq 0}\}.$$ This set does not have a core. The first family of elements implies that a core could be ${\mathcal{M}}[x_1]$, however with this choice it is impossible to find an associated finite set since every element of ${\mathcal{M}}[x_2]$ is in the set. Similarly, ${\mathcal{M}}[x_1,x_2]$ cannot be a core since the corresponding finite set must be $\{1,v_1,v_2\}$ which would imply that $1\cdot{\mathcal{M}}[x_2]$ belongs to the set which is not true.
\[compliant\] Let $S[z]$ be a polynomial ring. Suppose that ${\mathcal{B}}$ and ${\mathcal{C}}$ are subsets of $S[z]$. We say that ${\mathcal{B}}$ and ${\mathcal{C}}$ are compliant if there is a set $E$ which is a core for ${\mathcal{B}}-{\mathcal{C}}$ and ${\mathcal{C}}-{\mathcal{B}}$. If in addition ${\mathcal{B}}$ and ${\mathcal{C}}$ are bases for $S[z]$ then we say that ${\mathcal{B}}$ and ${\mathcal{C}}$ are compliant bases.
\[ex4\] Let ${\mathcal{B}}$ be the basis from Example \[ex1\] and ${\mathcal{C}}$ the spanning set from Example \[ex2\]. Then $${\mathcal{C}}-{\mathcal{B}}= \{x^nv_1(x,y), x^nv_2(x,y) : n\in{\mathbb{Z}}_{\geq0}\},$$ and $${\mathcal{B}}-{\mathcal{C}}= \{x\cdot x^n, yx^n : n\in{\mathbb{Z}}_{\geq0}\}.$$ Then ${\mathcal{B}}$ and ${\mathcal{C}}$ are compliant with core ${\mathcal{M}}[x]$. The finite set $A$ for ${\mathcal{C}}-{\mathcal{B}}$ is $\{v_1,v_2\}$ while the finite set for ${\mathcal{B}}-{\mathcal{C}}$ is $\{x,y\}$ and $t\geq 1$ for both.
\[ex5\] Now consider ${\mathcal{V}}={{\bf V}}(y^2-x_2^2-x_1^2-1)$ and let ${\mathcal{C}}$ be the spanning set from Example \[ex3\] and let ${\mathcal{B}}$ be ${\mathcal{M}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ i.e. $\{1, x_1^nx_2^m, yx_1^nx_2^m : n,m\in{\mathbb{Z}}_{\geq0}\}$. Then $${\mathcal{C}}-{\mathcal{B}}= \{x_1^nx_2^mv_1, x_1^nx_2^mv_2 : n,m\in{\mathbb{Z}}_{\geq 0}\},$$ and $${\mathcal{B}}-{\mathcal{C}}= \{x_2\cdot x_1^nx_2^m, yx_1^nx_2^m : n,m\in{\mathbb{Z}}_{\geq0}\}.$$ Then ${\mathcal{B}}$ and ${\mathcal{C}}$ are compliant with core given by ${\mathcal{M}}[x_1,x_2]$. The finite set $A$ for ${\mathcal{C}}-{\mathcal{B}}$ is $\{v_1,v_2\}$ while the finite set for ${\mathcal{B}}-{\mathcal{C}}$ is $\{x_2,y\}$ and $t\geq 1$ for both.
For an example of bases which are not compliant, let ${\mathcal{B}}$ be the monomials $\{z^{n}:n\in{\mathbb{Z}}_{\geq0},z\in{\mathbb{C}}\}$. Let ${\mathcal{C}}$ be the scaled monomials under the transformation $z\mapsto rz$, i.e. ${\mathcal{C}}= \{(rz)^n : n\in{\mathbb{Z}}_{\geq0},z\in{\mathbb{C}}\}$. Then ${\mathcal{B}}-{\mathcal{C}}={\mathcal{B}}$ and ${\mathcal{B}}$ has core given by ${\mathcal{B}}$, while ${\mathcal{C}}-{\mathcal{B}}={\mathcal{C}}$ and ${\mathcal{C}}$ has core given by ${\mathcal{C}}$. Since these cores are different it follows that ${\mathcal{B}}$ and ${\mathcal{C}}$ are not compliant.
The following structural lemma is formally obvious, but will be useful when dealing with specific examples.
\[commoncore\] Let $S[z]$ be a polynomial ring. Suppose that ${\mathcal{B}}$ and ${\mathcal{C}}$ are bases for $S[z]$ with each with core $E$. Then ${\mathcal{B}}$ and ${\mathcal{C}}$ are compliant bases for $S[z]$.
Suppose that $t$ is sufficiently large so that $$\begin{aligned}
\{b\in {\mathcal{B}}: \deg(b)\geq t\} &= \{ae : e\in E, a\in A_{\mathcal{B}}\}\\
\{c\in {\mathcal{C}}: \deg(c)\geq t\} &= \{ae : e\in E, a\in A_{\mathcal{C}}\}.\end{aligned}$$ Any element in ${\mathcal{B}}-{\mathcal{C}}$ of degree $\geq t$ (resp. ${\mathcal{C}}-{\mathcal{B}}$) has the form $ae, a\in A_{\mathcal{B}}$ (resp. $ae, a\in A_{\mathcal{C}}$). It follows that ${\mathcal{B}}-{\mathcal{C}}$ has core $E$ and ${\mathcal{C}}-{\mathcal{B}}$ has core $E$ as required.
Before proving our main result we need the following counting lemma.
\[countinglemma\] Let ${\mathcal{V}}$ be an affine algebraic variety of pure dimension $M$. Then $$\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty} \frac{N_k}{l_k} =0.$$
Since $N_k$ and $l_k$ are preserved under linear transformations, we may assume that ${\mathbb{C}}[x]$, $x\in{\mathbb{C}}^M$ is a Noether normalisation for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ We will utilise the following well known calculations (e.g. [@LevNotes page 36]) to derive the result; $$l^x_k = \frac{Mk}{M+1}N_k^x,$$ and so $$\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty} \frac{N_k^x}{l_k^x} = \lim_{k\rightarrow\infty} \frac{M+1}{Mk} = 0.$$ Since ${\mathbb{C}}[x]$ is a Noether normalisation for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$, there exists finitely many elements $f_j\in{\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ such that ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]=\bigoplus_{j\in J} f_j{\mathbb{C}}[x]$. If $n=|J|$ then $$N_k = \dim({\mathbb{C}}_k[{\mathcal{V}}]) = \dim\left(\bigoplus_{j\in J} f_j {\mathbb{C}}_{k-\deg(f_j)}[x]\right) \leq n\dim({\mathbb{C}}[x]) = nN^x_k.$$ Next, clearly $N_k^x \leq N_k$ so it follows that $l^x_k \leq l_k$. With these calculations we can estimate $$\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty} \frac{N_k}{l_k} \leq \lim_{k\rightarrow\infty} \frac{nN^x_k}{l^x_k} =0$$ as desired.
The following theorem is the main result of this section. It shows that two bases being compliant is a sufficient condition for their corresponding transfinite diameters to be equal.
\[mainthm\] Let ${\mathcal{V}}$ be an affine algebraic variety of pure dimension $M$, $K\subset {\mathcal{V}}$ a compact set, and suppose that ${\mathcal{B}}$ and ${\mathcal{C}}$ are compliant graded bases for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$. If the limit $$\log d^{\mathcal{C}}(K)=\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty} \frac{1}{l_k} \log\|VDM[{\mathcal{C}}_k]\|_{L^\infty(K)}$$ exists, then $$\log d^{{\mathcal{B}}}(K)=\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty} \frac{1}{l_k} \log\|VDM[{\mathcal{B}}_k]\|_{L^\infty(K)}$$ exists. Moreover, $d^{\mathcal{B}}(K) = d^{{\mathcal{C}}}(K)$.
The strategy is to prove Theorem \[mainthm\] is to transform $VDM[{\mathcal{B}}]$ into $VDM[{\mathcal{C}}]$ then measure the impact the scale factor has on the determinant calculation. If the growth of that scale factor is sufficiently slow then it will decay to 1 in the limit giving the result.
We first study the row operations needed to transform a row of $VDM[{\mathcal{B}}_k]$ into a row of $VDM[{\mathcal{C}}_k]$. Let $E$ be the common core of ${\mathcal{B}}-{\mathcal{C}}$ and ${\mathcal{C}}-{\mathcal{B}}$. Let $C$ be the associated finite subset of ${\mathcal{C}}-{\mathcal{B}}$ (with respect to $E$), and let $B$ be the finite set associated to ${\mathcal{B}}-{\mathcal{C}}$ (with respect to $E$). For each $c_i\in C$ there is a (finite) linear combination of $e_{ij}b_{ij}\in {\mathcal{B}}$ such that $$c_i = \sum_{j} a_{ij}e_{ij}b_{ij}, \quad a_{ij}\in{\mathbb{C}}{\backslash}\{0\}.$$ Multiplying through by some $e\in E$ we obtain $$c_ie = \left(\sum_{j} a_{ij}e_{ij}b_{ij}\right)e=\sum_{j} a_{ij}\left(e_{ij}b_{ij}e\right), \quad a_{ij}\in{\mathbb{C}}{\backslash}\{0\}.$$ These linear combinations tell us the row operations necessary to transform a row in $VDM[{\mathcal{B}}_k]$ to a row in $VDM[{\mathcal{C}}_k]$. Precisely,
- to make a row of $c_i$ entries we add $a_{ij}$ times the $e_{ij}b_{ij}$ row,
- to make a row of $c_ie$ entries we add $a_{ij}$ times the $e_{ij}b_{ij}e$ row.
Let $I$ be the set of double-indices $\{(i,j) : a_{ij}\neq 0\}$ appearing in these calculations. From linear algebra we know that the only row operation which scales the absolute value of the determinant is multiplication of a row by a constant. The multiplications that are needed to transform $VDM[{\mathcal{B}}_k]$ into $VDM[{\mathcal{C}}_k]$ must come from the set $\{a_{ij}:ij\in I\}$. To this end, let $m= \min\{|a_{ij}| : (i,j)\in I\}$ and $M=\max\{|a_{ij}| : (i,j)\in I\}$. Now we can estimate $$m^{N_k}\|VDM[{\mathcal{C}}_k]\|_{L^\infty(K)} \leq \|VDM[{\mathcal{B}}_k]\|_{L^\infty(K)} \leq M^{N_k}\|VDM[{\mathcal{C}}_k]\|_{L^\infty(K)}$$ where the factor $N_k$ is the number of rows in the matrices. Taking $1/l_k$ roots, the $\log$ of everything, and the limit as $k\rightarrow\infty$ we conclude, using Lemma \[countinglemma\], that $$\begin{aligned}
\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}\frac{1}{l_k}\log\|VDM[{\mathcal{C}}_k]\|_{L^\infty(K)}
&=\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}\frac{N_k}{l_k}\log m+\frac{1}{l_k}\log\|VDM[{\mathcal{C}}_k]\|_{L^\infty(K)} \\
&\leq \lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}\|VDM[{\mathcal{B}}_k]\|_{L^\infty(K)} \\
&\leq \lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}\frac{{N_k}}{l_k}\log M+\frac{1}{l_k}\log\|VDM[{\mathcal{C}}_k]\|_{L^\infty(K)}\\
&=\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}\frac{1}{l_k}\log\|VDM[{\mathcal{C}}_k]\|_{L^\infty(K)}.\end{aligned}$$
Adapting this proof to more general settings is possible if an analogous version of Lemma \[countinglemma\] is available in this setting.
Relation between $d^{cm}(K)$ and $d^{bb}(K)$
============================================
Theorem \[mainthm\] provides a useful test to determine whether transfinite diameters with respect to two bases are equivalent. Our strategy to show that $d^{cm}(K)$ and $d^{bb}(K)$ are equivalent is to show that the cm-basis and bb-basis are compliant with ${\mathcal{M}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ and hence equivalent. It would be possible to show that the cm-basis and bb-basis are compliant directly but the working necessary lends itself naturally to a comparison to ${\mathcal{M}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$.
cm-Basis is Compliant with ${\mathcal{M}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$
---------------------------------------------------------
We begin with a lemma which justifies the claim about the normal form asserted in Remark \[remark\]
\[deglem\] Let ${\mathcal{V}}$ be an affine algebraic variety of pure dimension $M$. Suppose that ${\mathbb{C}}[x]$ is a Noether normalisation for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$. If there is some $p\in {{\bf I}}({\mathcal{V}})$ with ${\textsc{lt}}(p)=x^\beta y^\alpha$ then there is some $q\in{{\bf I}}(V)$ with ${\textsc{lt}}(q)=y^\alpha$. In particular if $y^\alpha\in{\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ then $x^\beta*y^\alpha = x^\beta y^\alpha$ and we have the decomposition $${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}] = \bigoplus_{\alpha\in A} y^\alpha {\mathbb{C}}[x]$$ for some finite collection of multi-indices $A$.
By hypothesis there exists $g_i\in{{\bf I}}({\mathcal{V}})$ and $m_i\in{\mathbb{Z}}_{\geq0}$ such that ${\textsc{lt}}(g_i) = y_i^{m_i}$. Without loss of generality assume that $m_i$ is minimal for each $i$. Since ${\textsc{lt}}(g_i) \neq {\textsc{lt}}(g_j)$ for $i\neq j$ it is clear that the set $\{g_1,...,g_{N-M}\}$ is linearly independent, it follows that $\dim({{\bf V}}(g_1,...,g_{N-M}))=M$. Since each $g_i\in{{\bf I}}({\mathcal{V}})$ it follows that ${\mathcal{V}}\subset{{\bf V}}(g_1,...,g_{N-M})$. Suppose that $f\in {{\bf I}}({\mathcal{V}})$ and $f\not\in {\langle}g_1,...,g_{N-M}{\rangle}$. Then $\dim({{\bf V}}(g_1,...,g_{N-M},f))=M-1$ and $ {\mathcal{V}}\subset{{\bf V}}(g_1,...,g_{N-M},f)$ but $\dim({\mathcal{V}})=M$, a contradiction, which implies that there is no element $f$. It follows that ${{\bf I}}({\mathcal{V}}) \subset {\langle}g_1,...,g_{N-M}{\rangle}$ which implies that ${{\bf V}}(g_1,...,g_{N-M})\subset {\mathcal{V}}$ and hence ${\mathcal{V}}={{\bf V}}(g_1,...,g_{N-M})$.\
\
From this result the claims in the lemma follow. Since $p\in{{\bf I}}({\mathcal{V}})$ we can write $p = \sum f_ig_i$ and ${\textsc{lt}}(p)={\textsc{lt}}(\sum f_ig_i)$ and the first claim follows. If $y^\alpha\in{\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ then ${\textsc{lt}}(g_i)$ does not divide $y^\alpha$ for any $i$, and since the normal form calculation relies on polynomial division, it follows that $x^\beta *y^\alpha=x^\beta y^\alpha$. The decomposition of ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ is immediate with this last result.
This property is not true for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ in general. Consider ${\mathcal{V}}=(z^2+y^2-xy+x+1, z^2+y^2+y+2)\subset{\mathbb{C}}^3$. Then $x,y\in{\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ but $x*y = y-x+1$. In the situation of Lemma \[deglem\] we have $xy-y+x-1\in {{\bf I}}({\mathcal{V}})$ and it is clear by construction that there is no $q\in{{\bf I}}({\mathcal{V}})$ such that ${\textsc{lt}}(q)=y$ since $y\in{\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$. This is also evident from the decomposition $${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}] = {\mathbb{C}}[x] \oplus {\mathbb{C}}[y] \oplus z{\mathbb{C}}[x] \oplus z{\mathbb{C}}[y].$$
\[cmmcompliant\] Let ${\mathcal{V}}$ be an affine algebraic variety with distinct intersections with infinity, ${\mathbb{C}}[x]$ a Noether normalisation for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ and ${\mathcal{C}}$ the corresponding cm-basis ordered by any graded ordering. Then ${\mathcal{C}}$ and ${\mathcal{M}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ are compliant bases for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$.
By Lemma \[coxmaulem\] it is easy to see that $$\begin{aligned}
{\mathcal{C}}-{\mathcal{M}}[{\mathcal{V}}] &= \{x^\beta v_i : \beta\in{\mathbb{Z}}_{\geq0}^M, i=1,...,d\},\\
{\mathcal{M}}[{\mathcal{V}}]-{\mathcal{C}}&= \{x^\beta x_M^l y^\alpha : \beta\in{\mathbb{Z}}^{M}_{\geq 0}, x_M^l y^\alpha \in {\mathcal{M}}[z], l+|\alpha|=t\}.\end{aligned}$$ By Lemma \[deglem\] these elements are in normal form. It is easy to see that common core for these sets is ${\mathcal{M}}[x]=\{x^\beta:\beta\in{\mathbb{Z}}^M_{\geq0}\}$ and that the finite sets are $C=\{v_i : i=1,...,d\}$ and $B=\{x_M^ly^\alpha : l+|\alpha|=t\}$.
Let ${\mathcal{V}}$ be an affine algebraic variety with distinct intersections with infinity, $K\subset{\mathcal{V}}$ a compact set, and ${\mathbb{C}}[x]$ a Noether normalisation for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$. Then $d^{cm}(K)=d^{{\mathcal{M}}[{\mathcal{V}}]}(K)$.
By Proposition \[cmmcompliant\], any cm-basis is compliant with ${\mathcal{M}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$. The result now follows from Theorem \[mainthm\].
bb-Basis is Compliant with ${\mathcal{M}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$
---------------------------------------------------------
We will show that ${\mathcal{M}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ and a bb-basis are compliant with core ${\mathcal{M}}[x]$. Before we can do this we need to study the structure of a bb-basis.
\[cxon\] Suppose that ${\mathcal{V}}$ is a pure $M$-dimensional affine algebraic variety with $d$ sheets and suppose we have a Noether presentation $(x,y)$. Let $\nu = ({dd^c}V_{T_{\mathcal{V}}})^M/d$ with respect to these coordinates. Then the monomials ${\mathcal{M}}[x]$ are $L^2(\nu)$-orthonormal.
Observe that for any $\alpha\in{\mathbb{Z}}_{\geq 0}^M$ $$\begin{aligned}
\int_{\mathcal{V}}x^{\alpha}\overline{x^\alpha}\,({dd^c}V_{T_{\mathcal{V}}})^M &= \int_{{\partial}T_{\mathcal{V}}} x^{\alpha}\overline{x^\alpha} d\mu \\
&= \frac{1}{d}\sum_{i=1}^d\int_{|x_1|=...=|x_M|=1}|x_1|^{\alpha_1}...|x_M|^{\alpha_M}\,d\mu = \int 1\,d\mu = 1, \end{aligned}$$ where $\mu$ is the normalised Lebesgue measure on $\{|x_1|=...=|x_M|=1\}$. Note we have used the standard fact that $({dd^c}\max\{\log^+|x_1|,...,\log^+|x_M|)^M$ is the normalised current of integration on $\{|x_1|=...=|x_M|=1\}$. Similarly, if $\alpha,\beta\in{\mathbb{Z}}^M_{\geq 0}$ with $\alpha\neq\beta$ then at least one of $\alpha_j-\beta_j\neq 0$, without loss of generality assume that this is the case for $\alpha_1-\beta_1$. It is standard that in this case $$\begin{aligned}
\int_{0}^{2\pi} e^{i\theta(\alpha_1-\beta_1)}\,d\theta = 0.\end{aligned}$$ Using Fubini’s theorem and the fact about $({dd^c}\max\{\log^+|x_1|,...,\log^+|x_M|)^M$, we calculate that $$\begin{aligned}
\int_{\mathcal{V}}x^{\alpha}\overline{x^\beta}\,({dd^c}V_{T_{\mathcal{V}}})^M &= \int_{{\partial}T_{\mathcal{V}}} x^{\alpha}\overline{x^\beta} d\nu = \frac{1}{d}\sum_{i=1}^d \int_{|x_1|=...=|x_M|=1}\,x^{\alpha}\overline{x^\beta} d\mu\\
&= \int_{\theta_1=0}^{2\pi} ... \int_{\theta_M=0}^{2\pi} e^{i\theta_1(\alpha_1-\beta_1)}\cdot...\cdot e^{i\theta_M(\alpha_M-\beta_M)}\,d\theta_M...d\theta_1\\
&=\underbrace{\int_{\theta_1=0}^{2\pi}e^{i\theta_1(\alpha_1-\beta_1)}\,d\theta_1}_{=0}\cdot\, ...\cdot\int_{\theta_M=0}^{2\pi}e^{i\theta_M(\alpha_M-\beta_M)}\,d\theta_M\\
&=0\end{aligned}$$ which proves the claim.
\[bbstructure\] Let ${\mathcal{V}}$ be an affine algebraic variety of pure dimension $M$ with Noether presentation $(x,y)$ and probability measure $\nu=({dd^c}V_{T_{\mathcal{V}}})^M/d$. Suppose that $${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]=\bigoplus_{\alpha\in A}y^\alpha{\mathbb{C}}[x].$$ Let $B_A$ be the elements of $\{y^\alpha:\alpha\in A\}$ after Gram-Schmidt with respect to $L^2(\nu)$. Then a bb-basis ${\mathcal{B}}$ for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ is given by $${\mathcal{B}}= \{x^\beta f_j : x^\beta\in {\mathcal{M}}[x], f_j\in B_A\},$$ i.e. ${\mathcal{M}}[x]$ is a core for ${\mathcal{B}}$.
There are two things to check; that ${\mathcal{B}}$ is an orthonormal set and that it is a spanning set for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$. The normalisation condition can be checked by calculating directly that $$\begin{aligned}
{\langle}x^\beta f_j, x^\beta f_j{\rangle}_{L^2(\nu)} &= \left(\int_{T_{\mathcal{V}}} |x|^{2\beta}|f_j|^2\,d\nu\right)^\frac{1}{2}=\left(\int_{T_{\mathcal{V}}} |f_j|^2\,d\nu\right)^\frac{1}{2}=1. \end{aligned}$$ The second equality follows from by Proposition \[cxon\], while the last equality follows from the definition of $f_j$. The orthogonality of the set can also be checked by calculation in the following way. First consider $x^\beta f_j$ and $x^\alpha f_i$ with $i\neq j$ (we allow the possibility that $\alpha=\beta$.) Since each $|x_k|=1$ on $T_{\mathcal{V}}$ we can estimate $$\begin{aligned}
|{\langle}x^\beta f_j, x^\gamma f_i{\rangle}_{L^2(\nu)}| &= \left|\int_{T_{\mathcal{V}}} x^\beta \overline{x^\gamma} f_j\overline{f_i}\,d\nu\right|^\frac{1}{2}\leq \left|\int_{T_{\mathcal{V}}} f_j\overline{f_i}\,d\nu\right|^\frac{1}{2}=0. \end{aligned}$$ And it follows that $x^\beta f_j$ and $x^\gamma f_i$ are orthogonal. Now suppose that $i=j$ and $\alpha\neq\beta$. Since $T_{\mathcal{V}}$ is compact, each $|f_j|$ is bounded by some constant $M$ independent of $j$. Then we estimate $$\begin{aligned}
|{\langle}x^\beta f_j, x^\gamma f_j{\rangle}_{L^2(\nu)}| &= \left|\int_{T_{\mathcal{V}}} x^\beta \overline{x^\gamma} |f_j|^2\,d\nu\right|^\frac{1}{2}\\
&\leq M\left|\int_{T_{\mathcal{V}}} x^\beta \overline{x^\gamma}\,d\nu\right|^\frac{1}{2}=0, \end{aligned}$$ by Proposition \[cxon\]. This shows that the set is orthonormal.\
\
To show that ${\mathcal{B}}$ is a basis for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ observe that $|B_A| = |A|$ and that the elements of $B_A$ are linearly independent. It follows that for any $k\geq a=\max\{|\alpha|\}$ that $$\dim({\mathbb{C}}_k[{\mathcal{V}}]) = \dim\{x^\beta f_j : \deg(x^\beta f_j)\leq k, x^\beta\in{\mathcal{M}}[x], f_j\in B_A\}).$$ Since the elements of $B_A$ are linear combinations of elements from ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$, the above equality in dimensions implies that $\operatorname*{span}\{b\in{\mathcal{B}}\} = {\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ as required.
\[bbcompliant\] Let ${\mathcal{V}}$ be an affine algebraic variety of pure dimension $M$ with Noether presentation $(x,y)$. Let ${\mathcal{B}}$ be the elements of a bb-basis for ${\mathcal{V}}$. Then ${\mathcal{B}}$ and ${\mathcal{M}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ are compliant bases for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$.
From Propositions \[cxon\] and \[bbstructure\] we conclude that the elements which are not $L^2(\nu)$-orthonormal in ${\mathcal{M}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ are $\{x^\beta y^{\alpha}:\alpha\in A, \alpha\neq0, \beta\in{\mathbb{Z}}^{M}_{\geq0}\}$. Again by Proposition \[bbstructure\] it is sufficient to study the orthonormalisations of the $y^\alpha$ alone. To this end, write $[y^\alpha]_{\nu}$ to be the corresponding orthonormal elements (i.e. those obtained by using the Gram-Schmidt algorithm on ${\mathcal{M}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$). Let $$B_A = \{[y^\alpha]_{\nu} : \alpha\in A\}.$$We make the following structural observations $$\begin{aligned}
{\mathcal{B}}&= \{ x^\beta f_j : f_j\in B_A, \beta\in{\mathbb{Z}}^{M}_{\geq 0}\}\\
{\mathcal{M}}[{\mathcal{V}}]&=\{x^\beta y^\alpha : \alpha\in A, \beta\in{\mathbb{Z}}^M_{\geq0}\}.\end{aligned}$$ Clearly both ${\mathcal{B}}$ and ${\mathcal{M}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ have core ${\mathcal{M}}[x]$ and so by Lemma \[commoncore\] ${\mathcal{B}}$ and ${\mathcal{M}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ are compliant.
Let ${\mathcal{V}}$ be an affine algebraic variety of pure dimension $M$ with Noether presentation $(x,y)$ and $K\subset{\mathcal{V}}$ a compact set. Then if ${\mathcal{B}}$ is a bb-basis for ${\mathcal{V}}$ we have $$d^{bb}_\nu(K) = d^{{\mathcal{M}}[{\mathcal{V}}]}(K).$$
By Proposition \[cmmcompliant\], a bb-basis is compliant with ${\mathcal{M}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$. The result now follows from Theorem \[mainthm\].
\[propcmbb\] Let ${\mathcal{V}}$ be an affine algebraic variety of pure dimension $M$ with distinct intersections with infinity and Noether presentation $(x,y)$. If $K\subset {\mathcal{V}}$ is a compact set then $$d^{cm}(K) = d^{bb}_\nu(K).$$
Adaption to the Original Statement of Berman-Boucksom
=====================================================
The original statement of Berman-Boucksom had the definition of the transfinite diameter being $$\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}\frac{1}{kN_k}\log\|VDM[S_k]\|_{L^{\infty}(K)}.\label{bboriginal}$$ This statement is more convenient in their setting despite the unusual denominator. To relate equation (\[bboriginal\]) to Corollary \[propcmbb\] it is simply a matter of comparing the growth of $kN_k$ and $l_k$. The estimate we need to derive is not immediately obvious so we consider the following example to motivate the derivation.
Suppose that $(x,y)\in {\mathbb{C}}^M\times{\mathbb{C}}^2$, $A=\{(0,0), (1,0), (0,1), (2,0), (1,1), (0,2)\}$, and ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]=\bigoplus_{\alpha\in A} y^\alpha {\mathbb{C}}[x]$ then we can count the elements in $N_k$ via the following table $$\begin{aligned}
\begin{array}{rlllllllll}
\text{Terms of degree}& & \deg 0& \deg 1 & \deg 2 & \deg 3 & \deg 4 & ... & \deg k\\
\hline \text{Terms of the form }1\times{\mathcal{M}}[x] & & N^x_{=0} & N_{=1}^x & N_{=2}^x & N_{=3}^x & N_4^x & ... & N_{=k}^x \\
\text{Terms of the form }y^{(1,0)}\times{\mathcal{M}}[x] & & & N^x_{=0} & N_{=1}^x & N_{=2}^x & N_{=3}^x & ... &N_{=k-1}^x \\
\text{Terms of the form }y^{(0,1)}\times{\mathcal{M}}[x] & & & N^x_{=0} & N_{=1}^x & N_{=2}^x & N_{=3}^x & ... &N_{=k-1}^x \\
\text{Terms of the form }y^{(2,0)}\times{\mathcal{M}}[x] & & & & N^x_{=0} & N_{=1}^x & N_{=2}^x & ... & N_{=k-2}^x \\
\text{Terms of the form }y^{(1,1)}\times{\mathcal{M}}[x] & & & & N^x_{=0} & N_{=1}^x & N_{=2}^x & ... & N_{=k-2}^x \\
\text{Terms of the form }y^{(0,2)}\times{\mathcal{M}}[x] & & & & N^x_{=0} & N_{=1}^x & N_{=2}^x & ... & N_{=k-2}^x
\end{array}\end{aligned}$$ Since $N_k=\sum_{j\leq k} N_{=j}$, observe that $6N_{1}^x\leq N_{3} \leq 6N_{3}^x$. In general we have $6N_{ k-2}^x\leq N_k \leq 6N_k^x$ where the $-2$ term comes from $a=\max\{|\alpha|:\alpha\in A\}$ and the 6 is equal to $n=|A|$. The following lemma formalises this observation.
\[ineqlem\] Suppose that ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]=\bigoplus_{\alpha\in A} y^\alpha{\mathbb{C}}[x]$. Then $$nN^x_{ k-a}\leq N_k \leq nN^x_{k}$$ and $$nl^x_{ k-a}\leq l_k \leq nl_k^x$$ where $n=|A|$ and $a=\max\{|\alpha|:\alpha\in A\}$.
Let $N^\alpha_{ k}$ be the number of monomials of degree at most $k$ which are of the form $y^\alpha x^\beta$ where $\beta\in{\mathbb{Z}}_{\geq0}^{M}$. Then $N^\alpha_{ k}= N^x_{ k-|\alpha|}$. As $a\geq |\alpha|$ for any $\alpha\in A$, clearly $$N^x_{ k-a} \leq N^\alpha_{ k} \leq N^x_{ k}$$ for any $\alpha$. Summing over all $n$ possibilities for $\alpha$ we obtain $$nN^x_{ k-a} \leq N_k \leq nN_k^x$$ as desired. The argument for $l_k$ is identical.
$\displaystyle\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty} \frac{kN_k}{l_k} = \frac{M+1}{M}.$
If $a=\max\{|\alpha|:\alpha\in A\}$ and $n=|A|$ then by Lemma \[ineqlem\] $$nN_{ k-a}^x \leq N_k \leq nN_k^x$$ and $$nl_{a-k}^x \leq l_k \leq nl_k^x.$$ From these estimates and the identity $l_k^x = \frac{M}{M+1} kN_k^x$ it follows that $$\frac{M+1}{M} \frac{N_{ k-a}^x}{N_k^x}= \frac{knN_{ k-a}^x}{nl_k^x} \leq \frac{kN_k}{l_k} \leq \frac{knN_k^x}{nl^{x}_{ k-a}} = \frac{M+1}{M}\frac{N_k^x}{N_{ k-a}^x}.\label{estim}$$ Now we compute $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{N_k^x}{N_{ k-a}^x} &= \frac{\begin{pmatrix} M+k \\ M \end{pmatrix}}{\begin{pmatrix} M+k-a \\ M \end{pmatrix}} = \frac{(M+k)!}{M!k!} \frac{M!(k-a)!}{(M+k-a)!} \\
&= \frac{(M+k)\cdot...\cdot(M+k-a+1)}{k \cdot ... \cdot (k-a+1)} \\
&= \underbrace{\left(\frac{M}{k}+1\right)\cdot...\cdot\left(\frac{M}{k-a+1}+1\right)}_{a\text{ multiplications}}\\
&\longrightarrow 1\quad\text{ as }k\rightarrow \infty.\end{aligned}$$ This calculation in conjunction with the estimate (\[estim\]) yields $$\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty} \frac{kN_k}{l_k} = \frac{M+1}{M}.$$
\[bbrelated\] $$\frac{M+1}{M}\log d^{bb}_\nu(K) = \lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}\frac{1}{kN_k}\log\|VDM[S_k]\|_{L^{\infty}(K)}$$
An Example
==========
Let ${\mathcal{V}}= {{\bf V}}(y^2-x^2-1)$, by Example \[example2.2\] this variety has distinct intersections with infinity.\
\
*Cox-ma‘u Transfinite Diameter.*\
To construct the $v_i$ polynomials from Lemma \[coxmaulem\] we use techniques from [@Mau11]. To this end, up to a scale factor, $v_1$ and $v_2$ come from the factors of the top degree homogeneous part of ${\mathcal{V}}$ i.e. $y^2-x^2$. We can set $v_1 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(y-x)$ and $v_2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(y+x)$. It is easily checked that these polynomials satisfy the required conditions: $$\begin{aligned}
v_1^2 &= \frac{1}{2}y^2-\sqrt{2}yx+\frac{1}{2}x^2 = -\sqrt{2}yx+x^2+1 = x^2-\sqrt{2}(v_1+v_2)x+\frac{1}{2}\\
v_2^2 &= \frac{1}{2}y^2+\sqrt{2}yx+\frac{1}{2}x^2 = \sqrt{2}yx+x^2+1 = x^2+\sqrt{2}(v_1+v_2)x+\frac{1}{2}\\
v_1v_2&= \frac{1}{2}(y^2-x^2) = \frac{1}{2}.\end{aligned}$$ The corresponding cm-basis for ${\mathbb{C}}[{\mathcal{V}}]$ is $\{1, x^m v_1, x^m v_2 : m\in{\mathbb{Z}}_{\geq0}\}$ and a typical Vandermonde determinant takes the form $$\begin{aligned}
&VDM_{\zeta_1,...,\zeta_t}[{\mathcal{C}}_k] = \det\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 & ... & 1 \\
v_1(\zeta_1) & v_1(\zeta_2) & ... & v_1(\zeta_t) \\
v_2(\zeta_1) & v_2(\zeta_2) & ... & v_2(\zeta_t) \\
\zeta_{1x}\cdot v_1(\zeta_1) & \zeta_{2x}\cdot v_1(\zeta_2) & ... & \zeta_{tx}\cdot v_1(\zeta_t)\\
\zeta_{1x}\cdot v_2(\zeta_1) & \zeta_{2x}\cdot v_2(\zeta_2) & ... & \zeta_{tx}\cdot v_2(\zeta_t)\\
\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\
\zeta_{1x}^{k-1}\cdot v_2(\zeta_1) & \zeta_{2x}^{k-1}\cdot v_2(\zeta_2) & ... & \zeta_{tx}^{k-1}\cdot v_2(\zeta_t)\end{pmatrix}\end{aligned}$$ where we have written $\zeta_{ix}$ for the $x$-coordinate of $\zeta_i$ and $t$ is the number of elements in ${\mathcal{C}}_k$. Observe that $v_2+v_1 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} y$ and $v_2-v_1 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} x$. Thus to obtain the usual monomials $1, x, y, x^2, xy, ...$ in this determinant we add rows together to obtain the determinant $$\det\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 & ... & 1 \\
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \zeta_{1x} & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \zeta_{2x} & ... & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \zeta_{tx} \\
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \zeta_{1y} & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \zeta_{2y} & ... & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \zeta_{ty} \\
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\zeta_{1x}^2 & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\zeta_{2x}^2 & ... & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\zeta_{tx}^2 \\
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\zeta_{1x}\zeta_{1y} & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\zeta_{2x}\zeta_{2y} & ... & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\zeta_{tx}\zeta_{ty}\\
\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\zeta_{1x}^{k-1}\zeta_{1y} & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\zeta_{2x}^{k-1}\zeta_{2y} & ... & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\zeta_{tx}^{k-1}\zeta_{ty}\end{pmatrix}$$ Factoring out the $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$ terms we obtain $$\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^{t-1}\det\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 & ... & 1 \\
\zeta_{1x} & \zeta_{2x} & ... & \zeta_{tx} \\
\zeta_{1y} & \zeta_{2y} & ... & \zeta_{ty} \\
\zeta_{1x}^2 & \zeta_{2x}^2 & ... & \zeta_{tx}^2 \\
\zeta_{1x}\zeta_{1y} & \zeta_{2x}\zeta_{2y} & ... & \zeta_{tx}\zeta_{ty}\\
\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\
\zeta_{1x}^{k-1}\zeta_{1y} & \zeta_{2x}^{k-1}\zeta_{2y} & ... & \zeta_{tx}^{k-1}\zeta_{ty}\end{pmatrix} = \left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^{t-1} VDM_{\zeta_1,...,\zeta_t}[{\mathcal{M}}_k[{\mathcal{V}}]].$$ We can calculate that $t = 2k-1$ and $l_k = \frac{k(2k-1)}{2}$. Clearly $\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty} t/l_k = 0$. It then follows that $$\begin{aligned}
\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty} \frac{1}{l_k}\log\|VDM[{\mathcal{C}}_k]\|_{L^\infty(K)} &= \lim_{k\rightarrow\infty} \frac{1}{l_k}\log\|VDM[{\mathcal{M}}_k[{\mathcal{V}}]]\|_{L^\infty(K)}-\frac{t-1}{l_k}\log\sqrt{2} \\
&= \lim_{k\rightarrow\infty} \frac{1}{l_k}\log\|VDM[{\mathcal{M}}_k[{\mathcal{V}}]]\|_{L^\infty(K)}\end{aligned}$$ as expected.\
\
[*Berman-Boucksom Transfinite Diameter*]{}\
We have $T_{\mathcal{V}}= \{(x,y)\in V : |x|\leq 1\}$ and $\nu = \frac{1}{2}{dd^c}V_{T_{\mathcal{V}}} = \frac{1}{2}{dd^c}\log^+|x|$. It is well known that ${dd^c}\log^+|x|$ is equal to the normalised Lebesgue measure $\mu$ on the unit circle in the classical case (e.g. [@Ransford Theorem 3.7.4]). Observe that ${\mathcal{V}}$ is a two sheeted covering over $x$, hence the summation sign in what is to come. We perform Gram-Schmidt on the monomials $1, x, y, x^2, yx, ...$ with respect to $\nu$ to obtain the orthonormal basis $S$. $$\begin{aligned}
{\langle}1, 1{\rangle}_{L^2(\nu)}^2 &= \int_{{\mathcal{V}}} 1\,d\nu = \frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^2\int_{|x|=1} 1\,d\mu = \frac{2}{2}=1&\longrightarrow& 1\in S\\
{\langle}1, x{\rangle}_{L^2(\nu)}^2 &= \int_{{\mathcal{V}}} \overline{x}\,d\nu = \frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^2\int_{0}^{2\pi} e^{-i\theta} \,\frac{d\theta}{2\pi} = 0 && \\
{\langle}x, x{\rangle}_{L^2(\nu)}^2 &= \int_{{\mathcal{V}}} x\overline{x}\,d\nu = \frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^2\int_{0}^{2\pi} 1 \,\frac{d\theta}{2\pi} = 1 &\longrightarrow&x\in S\\
{\langle}1, y{\rangle}_{L^2(\nu)}^2 &= \int_{{\mathcal{V}}} \overline{y}\,d\nu = \frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^2\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}\overline{\sqrt{1+e^{2i\theta}}}\,d\theta = 0 &&\\
{\langle}x, y{\rangle}_{L^2(\nu)}^2 &= \int_{{\mathcal{V}}} x\overline{y}\,d\nu = \frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^2\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}e^{i\theta}\overline{\sqrt{1+e^{2i\theta}}}\,d\theta = 0 &&\\
{\langle}y, y{\rangle}_{L^2(\nu)}^2 &= \int_{{\mathcal{V}}} y\overline{y}\,d\nu = \frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^2\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}|1+e^{-2i\theta}|\,d\theta = \frac{4}{{\pi}} &\longrightarrow& \frac{\sqrt\pi}{2}y \in S\\
&\,\,\,\vdots &&\end{aligned}$$ Continuing in this way one obtains the orthonormal basis $S=\{x^m, \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2}yx^m: m\in{\mathbb{Z}}_{\geq 0}\}$. Similar to the previous part, we can deduce that $$\begin{aligned}
\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty} \frac{1}{l_k}\log\|VDM[S_k]\|_{L^\infty(K)} &= \lim_{k\rightarrow\infty} \frac{1}{l_k}\log\|VDM[{\mathcal{M}}_k[{\mathcal{V}}]]\|_{L^\infty(K)}-\frac{t-1}{l_k}\log\frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2}\\
&=\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty} \frac{1}{l_k}\log\|VDM[{\mathcal{M}}_k[{\mathcal{V}}]]\|_{L^\infty(K)}\end{aligned}$$ as expected.
[99]{} R. Berman and S. Boucksom, [*Equidistribution of [F]{}ekete points on complex manifolds*]{}, Preprint, arXiv:0807.0035.
R. Berman and S. Boucksom, [*Growth of balls of holomorphic sections and energy at equilibrium*]{}, Invent. Math., [**181**]{}(2)(2010), 337-394.
R. Berman, S. Boucksom and D.W. Nystr[ö]{}m, [*Fekete points and convergence towards equilibrium measures on complex manifolds*]{}, Acta. Math., [**207**]{}(1)(2011), 1-27.
D. Cox and S. Ma‘u, [*Transfinite diameter on complex algebraic varieties*]{}, Preprint, arXiv:1410.6962v2.
J. Hart and S. Ma‘u, [*Chebyshev and [R]{}obin constants on an algebraic curve*]{}, Ann. Pol. Math., [**115**]{}(2)(2015), 101-121.
J. Hart, [*A [R]{}obin Function for Algebraic Varieties and Applications to Pluripotential Theory*]{}, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Auckland, 2017.
J. Hart and S. Ma‘u, [*The [L]{}elong class on an affine variety*]{}, preprint.
N. Levenberg, [*Ten Lectures on Weighted Pluripotential Theory*]{}, Dolomites Research Notes on Approximation, Vol. 5, 2012.
N. Levenberg, [*Weighted pluripotential theory reuslts of [B]{}erman-[B]{}oucksom*]{}, arXiv:1010.4035.
S. Ma‘u, [*Chebyshev constants and transfinite diameter on algebraic curves in $\mathbb{C}^2$*]{}, Indiana U. Math. J., [**60**]{}(5)(2011), 1767-1796.
T. Ransford, [*Potential Theory in the Complex Plane*]{}, London Mathematical Society student texts; 28, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995.
W. Rudin, [*A geometric criterion for algebraic varieties*]{}, J. Math, Mech., [**17**]{}(1967/1968), 671-683.
R. Rumely, [*A [R]{}obin formula for the [F]{}ekete-[L]{}eja transfinite diameter*]{}, Math. Ann., [**337**]{}(4)(2007), 729-738.
V.P. Zakharjuta, [*Transfinite Diameter, [C]{}hebyshev constants, and capacity in $\mathbb{C}^n$*]{}, Math. USSR-Sb, [**25**]{}(1975), 350-374.
A. Zeriahi, [*Pluricomplex [G]{}reen functions and approximations of holomorphic functions*]{}, Pitman Red. Notes Math. Ser., vol. 347, 104-142, Longman, Harlow, 1996.
[^1]: See [@CoxMau15 page 4] for details.
[^2]: A graded ordering is an ordering where the elements are ordered by total degree before any other ordering. In Cox-ma‘u [@CoxMau15] a specific graded ordering is constructed for the proof, but their result holds for any graded ordering.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'Using the Riemann-Hilbert approach, we explicitly construct the asymptotic $\Psi$-function corresponding to the solution $y\sim\pm\sqrt{-x/2}$ as $|x|\to\infty$ to the second Painlevé equation $y_{xx}=2y^3+xy-\alpha$. We precisely describe the exponentially small jump in the dominant solution and the coefficient asymptotics in its power-like expansion.'
address: 'St Petersburg Department of Steklov Mathematical Institute, Fontanka 27, St Petersburg 191011, Russia'
author:
- 'A.A. Kapaev'
title: 'Quasi-linear Stokes phenomenon for the Hastings-M[c]{}Leod solution of the second Painlevé equation'
---
Introduction {#intro}
============
The second Painlevé equation, $$\label{p2}\tag{$P_2$}
y_{xx}=2y^3+xy-\alpha,\quad \alpha=const,$$ was introduced more than a century ago in a classification of the second order ODEs $y_{xx}=R(x,y,y_x)$ with the Painlevé property [@ince]. To this date, equation $P_2$ has found interesting and important applications in the modern theory of nonlinear waves [@abl_seg; @hast_mcleod], plasma physics [@ZKM], bifurcation theory [@maree], random matrices and combinatorics [@TW; @TW2], theory of semi-classical orthogonal polynomials [@BI] and others.
Among its various solutions, we distinguish those with a [*monotonic*]{} asymptotic behavior as $x\to\pm\infty$ (look for complete list of asymptotics and connection formulae to transcendent solutions of $P_2$ in [@kapaev4]). For instance, if $\alpha=0$ and $x\to+\infty$, there exists a 1-parameter family of solutions approximated with exponential accuracy by decreasing solutions of the Airy equation, $y_{xx}=xy$, see [@abl_seg], $$\label{Airy_sol}
y\simeq a\mbox{\rm Ai}(x)=
\frac{a}{2\sqrt\pi}x^{-1/4}e^{-\frac{2}{3}x^{3/2}}
\bigl(1+{\cal O}(x^{-3/2})\bigr),\quad
a=const.$$ If in the above asymptotics $0\leq a<1$, then the Painlevé function is bounded and oscillates as $x\to-\infty$, $$y\simeq
b(-x)^{-1/4}\sin\bigl(\tfrac{2}{3}(-x)^{3/2}-\tfrac{3}{4}b^2\ln(-x)
+\phi\bigr),$$ with real constants $b$ and $\phi$ determined by $a$, cf. [@abl_seg]. If $a>1$, then the solution blows up at a finite point. If $a=1$, then the solution of $P_2(\alpha=0)$ grows like a square root as $x\to-\infty$, $y\simeq\sqrt{-x/2}$, see [@hast_mcleod].
For the first time, the asymptotic as $|x|\to\infty$ behavior of the Painlevé transcendents in the complex domain was studied by Boutroux [@boutroux]. Generically, the Painlevé asymptotics within the sectors $\arg x\in\bigl(\frac{\pi}{3}n,\frac{\pi}{3}(n+1)\bigr)$, $n\in{\Bbb Z}$ is described by a modulated elliptic sine which trigonometrically degenerates along the directions $\arg
x=\frac{\pi}{3}n$.
Besides generic solutions, Boutroux described 1- and 0-parameter reductions of the trigonometric asymptotic solutions which admit analytic continuation from the ray $\arg x=\frac{\pi}{3}n$ into an adjacent complex sector. As $x\to\infty$ in the interior of the relevant complex sector, such solution is represented in the leading order by a power sum of $x$ and of a [*trans-series*]{} which is a sum of exponentially small terms, $$\label{gen_struct}
y=\hbox{(power series)}+\hbox{(exponential terms)}.$$ Expansions of such kind can be obtained using a conventional perturbation analysis.
In [@kapaev:P1; @kapaev:P2], it was observed that asymptotic solutions of the form (\[gen\_struct\]) exhibit a [*quasi-linear Stokes phenomenon*]{}, i.e. a discontinuity in a minor term with respect to $\arg x$. The first rigorous study of the quasi-linear Stokes phenomenon associated to solutions $y\sim\alpha/x$ as $x\to\infty$ for $P_2$ and $y\sim\sqrt{-x/6}$ as $x\to\infty$ for $P_1$ is presented in [@its_kapaev1; @kapaev2], where the reader can find a discussion of other approaches to the same problem.
Below, we study a quasi-linear Stokes phenomenon for the second Painlevé transcendent with the monotonic asymptotic behavior $y\sim\sqrt{-x/2}$ as $x\to-\infty$. Our main tool is the isomonodromy deformation method [@JMU; @FN; @its_nov] in the form of the Riemann-Hilbert problem approach via the nonlinear steepest descent method [@DZ].
As in [@its_kapaev1; @kapaev2], we pursue a two-fold goal, i.e. (a) we bring an exact meaning to the formal expression (\[gen\_struct\]), and (b) we evaluate the asymptotics of the coefficients of the leading power series in (\[gen\_struct\]).
Riemann-Hilbert problem for $P_2$ {#RH_p2}
=================================
The inverse problem method in the form of the Riemann-Hilbert (RH) problem was first applied to an asymptotic study of $P_2$ in [@FN]. Further study of the RH problem can be found in [@DZ; @FA; @FZ; @IFK; @its_kapaev3].
According to [@FN], the set of generic Painlevé functions is parameterized by two of the Stokes multipliers of the associated linear system denoted below by the symbols $s_k$, $k=0,1,2$. As it is shown in [@its_kapaev3], if $s_0(1+s_0s_1)\neq0$ then the asymptotic solution of the RH problem within the sector $\arg x\in(\frac{2\pi}{3},\pi)$ can be expressed in terms of elliptic $\theta$-functions which in turn yields an elliptic asymptotics to the Painlevé function itself. Assuming that the condition $s_0=0$ holds true, we arrive to an RH problem which leads to a decreasing asymptotics $y\sim\alpha/x$, see [@its_kapaev1].
In the present paper, we first construct an asymptotic solution to the relevant RH problem as $|x|\to\infty$, $\arg x\in(\frac{2\pi}{3},\pi)$ assuming that $$\label{Stokes_cond}
1+s_0s_1=0.$$
Below, we use the RH problem of Flaschka and Newell [@FN] modified as it is proposed in [@its_kapaev1]. This RH problem comes in a standard way from a collection of properly normalized solutions of the Lax pair for $P_2$,
\[Lax\_pair\_p2\] $$\begin{aligned}
\label{Lax_pair_p2_lambda}
&\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial\lambda}\Psi^{-1}=
-i\bigl(4\lambda^2+x+2y^2\bigr)\sigma_3
-\bigl(4y\lambda+\frac{\alpha}{\lambda}\bigr)\sigma_2
-2y_x\sigma_1,
\\\label{Lax_pair_p2_x}
&\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial x}\Psi^{-1}=
-i\lambda\sigma_3-y\sigma_2,\end{aligned}$$
where $\sigma_3=\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix}1&0\\0&-1\end{smallmatrix}\bigr)$, $\sigma_2=\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix}0&-i\\i&0\end{smallmatrix}\bigr)$, $\sigma_1=\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix}0&1\\1&0\end{smallmatrix}\bigr)$.
Let us introduce the piece-wise oriented contour $\gamma=C\cup\rho_+\cup\rho_-\cup_{k=0}^5\gamma_k$ which is the union of the rays $\gamma_k=\{\lambda\in{\Bbb C}\colon\
|\lambda|>r,\
\arg\lambda=\frac{\pi}{6}+\frac{\pi}{3}(k-1)\}$, $k=0,1,\dots,5$, oriented toward infinity, the clock-wise oriented circle $C=\{\lambda\in{\Bbb C}\colon\
|\lambda|=r\}$, and of two vertical radiuses $\rho_+=\{\lambda\in{\Bbb C}\colon\ |\lambda|<r,\
\arg\lambda=\frac{\pi}{2}\}$ and $\rho_-=\{\lambda\in{\Bbb C}\colon\ |\lambda|<r,\
\arg\lambda=-\frac{\pi}{2}\}$ oriented to the origin. The contour $\gamma$ divides the complex $\lambda$-plane into 8 regions $\Omega_k$, $k\in\{\mbox{\rm left},\mbox{\rm right},0,1,\dots,5\}$. $\Omega_{\mbox{\rm\tiny left}}$ and $\Omega_{\mbox{\rm\tiny right}}$ are left and right halves of the interior of the circle $C$ deprived the radiuses $\rho_+$, $\rho_-$. The regions $\Omega_k$, $k=0,1,\dots,5$, are the sectors between the rays $\gamma_k$ and $\gamma_{k-1}$ outside the circle, see Figure \[fig1\].
Let each of the regions $\Omega_k$, $k=\mbox{\rm right},0,1,2$, be a domain for a holomorphic $2\times2$ matrix function $\Psi_k(\lambda)$. Denote the collection of $\Psi_k(\lambda)$ by $\Psi(\lambda)$, $$\label{Psi_collect}
\Psi(\lambda)\bigr|_{\lambda\in\Omega_k}=\Psi_k(\lambda),\qquad
\Psi(\rme^{\rmi\pi}\lambda)=\sigma_2\Psi(\lambda)\sigma_2.$$ Let $\Psi_+(\lambda)$ and $\Psi_-(\lambda)$ be the limits of $\Psi(\lambda)$ on $\gamma$ to the left and to the right, respectively. Let us also introduce two matrices $\sigma_+=\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix}0&1\\0&0\end{smallmatrix}\bigr)$, $\sigma_-=\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix}0&0\\1&0\end{smallmatrix}\bigr)$.
The RH problem we talk about is the following one:
1. Find a piece-wise holomorphic $2\times2$ matrix function $\Psi(\lambda)$ such that $$\label{Psi_at_infty}
\Psi(\lambda)e^{\theta\sigma_3}\to I,\qquad
\lambda\to\infty,\qquad
\theta=i\bigl(\tfrac{4}{3}\lambda^3+x\lambda\bigr),$$ and $$\label{Psi_at_0}
\|\Psi_{\mbox{\rm\tiny right}}(\lambda)\lambda^{-\alpha\sigma_3}\|\leq
\mbox{\rm const},\qquad
\lambda\to0;$$
2. on the contour $\gamma$, the jump condition holds $$\label{jump_cond}
\Psi_+(\lambda)=\Psi_-(\lambda)S(\lambda),$$ where the piece-wise constant matrix $S(\lambda)$ is given by equations:
– on the rays $\gamma_k$, $$\label{p23}
S(\lambda)\bigr|_{\gamma_k}=S_k,\qquad
S_{2k-1}=I+s_{2k-1}\sigma_-,\qquad
S_{2k}=I+s_{2k}\sigma_+,$$ with the constants $s_k$ satisfying the constraints $$\label{s_constraints}
s_{k+3}=-s_k,\qquad
s_1-s_2+s_3+s_1s_2s_3=-2\sin\pi\alpha;$$
– on the radiuses $\rho_{\pm}$, $S(\lambda)$ is specified by the equations $$\begin{gathered}
\label{M_rels}
\lambda\in\rho_-\colon\
\Psi_{\mbox{\rm\tiny left}}(\rme^{2\pi i}\lambda)=
\Psi_{\mbox{\rm\tiny right}}(\lambda)M,
\\
\shoveleft{
\lambda\in\rho_+\colon\
\Psi_{\mbox{\rm\tiny right}}(\lambda)=
\Psi_{\mbox{\rm\tiny left}}(\lambda)\sigma_2M\sigma_2,
}\hfill\end{gathered}$$ where $$\begin{gathered}
\label{M}
M=\Bigl(e^{i\pi(\alpha-\frac{1}{2})\sigma_3}
+J_{\pm}\sigma_{\pm}\Bigr)(-i\sigma_2),
\\
\shoveleft{\text{with}}
\\
\shoveleft{ J_+=0\quad\hbox{ if }\quad
\tfrac{1}{2}+\alpha\notin{\Bbb N},\quad
\hbox{i.e.}\quad
\alpha\notin\bigl\{\tfrac{1}{2},\tfrac{3}{2},\dots\bigr\}, }
\\
\shoveleft{
J_-=0\quad\hbox{ if }\quad \tfrac{1}{2}-\alpha\notin {\Bbb N},
\quad\hbox{i.e.}\quad
\alpha\notin\bigl\{-\tfrac{1}{2},-\tfrac{3}{2},\dots\bigr\};
}\hfill\end{gathered}$$
– on the circle $C$, the piece-wise constant jump matrix $S(\lambda)$ is defined by the equations $$\begin{gathered}
\label{E_rels}
\Psi_0(\lambda)=\Psi_{\mbox{\rm\tiny right}}(\lambda)ES_0^{-1},\qquad
\Psi_1(\lambda)=\Psi_{\mbox{\rm\tiny right}}(\lambda)E,\qquad
\Psi_2(\lambda)=\Psi_{\mbox{\rm\tiny right}}(\lambda)ES_1,
\\
\shoveleft{
\Psi_3(\lambda)=
\Psi_{\mbox{\rm\tiny left}}(\lambda)\sigma_2E\sigma_2S_3^{-1},\qquad
\Psi_4(\lambda)=\Psi_{\mbox{\rm\tiny left}}(\lambda)\sigma_2E\sigma_2,
}
\\
\shoveleft{
\Psi_5(\lambda)=\Psi_{\mbox{\rm\tiny left}}(\lambda)\sigma_2E\sigma_2S_4.
}\hfill\end{gathered}$$ The connection matrix $E$, the Stokes matrices $S_k$ and the monodromy matrix $M$ satisfy the cyclic relation, $$\label{E_conditions}
ES_1S_2S_3=\sigma_2M^{-1}E\sigma_2.$$
A solution of the RH problem (\[Psi\_at\_infty\])–(\[E\_conditions\]), if exists, is unique.
\[resonant\] For the $\lambda$-equation associated with PII (\[Lax\_pair\_p2\_lambda\]) as well as for the above RH problem, the values $\alpha=\frac{1}{2}+n$, $n\in{\Bbb Z}$, are called [*resonant*]{} since the corresponding $\Psi$-function may have a logarithmic singularity at the origin. It is a quite common fallacy, that the RH problem is [*not*]{} uniquely solvable for resonant values of such parameters. As a matter of facts, monodromy data form a locally smooth complex surface (\[s\_constraints\]) with the special points $\alpha=\frac{1}{2}+n$, $n\in{\Bbb Z}$, $s_1=-s_2=s_3=(-1)^{n+1}$. To the latter, one has to attach a copy of ${\Bbb CP}^1$. A complex parameter describing the attached space ${\Bbb CP}^1$ can be interpreted as the ratio of a column entries of the connection matrix $E$ [@FN]. Thus neglecting the attached space ${\Bbb CP}^1$ may lead to the loss of uniqueness in the RH problem solution.
The asymptotics of $\Psi(\lambda)$ as $\lambda\to\infty$ is given by $$\label{Y_expansion}
Y(\lambda):=\Psi(\lambda)e^{\theta\sigma_3}=
I+\lambda^{-1}\bigl(-i{\Eu H}\sigma_3+\frac{y}{2}\sigma_1\bigr)+
{\cal O}(\lambda^{-2}),$$ where $$\label{H_def}
{\Eu H}=\tfrac{1}{2}y_x^2-\tfrac{1}{2}y^4-\tfrac{1}{2}xy^2+\alpha y$$ is the Hamiltonian for the second Painlevé equation. Thus $y(x)$ can be extracted from the “residue" of $Y(\lambda)$ at infinity, $$\label{y_from_Y}
y=2\lim_{\lambda\to\infty}\lambda Y_{12}(\lambda)=
2\lim_{\lambda\to\infty}\lambda Y_{21}(\lambda).$$ Equation (\[y\_from\_Y\]) specifies the Painlevé transcendent as the function $y=f(x,\alpha,\{s_k\})$ of the independent variable $x$, of the parameter $\alpha$ in the equation and of the Stokes multipliers $s_k$ (generically, the connection matrix $E$ can be expressed via $s_k$ using equation (\[E\_conditions\]) modulo arbitrary left diagonal (or triangular for half-integer $\alpha$) multiplier; at the special points of the monodromy surface (\[s\_constraints\]) $s_1=-s_2=s_3=(-1)^{n+1}$, $\alpha=\frac{1}{2}+n$, $n\in{\Bbb Z}$, the connection matrix $E$ contains a parameter $r\in{\Bbb C}P^1$ which specifies a relevant classical solution of $P_2$). Using the solution $y=f(x,\alpha,\{s_k\})$ and the symmetries of the Stokes multipliers described in [@kapaev:ell], we obtain further solutions of $P_2$: $$\begin{gathered}
\label{P_symmetries}
y=-f(x,-\alpha,\{-s_k\}),\qquad
y=\overline{f(\bar x,\bar\alpha,\{\overline{s_{4-k}}\})},
\\
\shoveleft{
y=\rme^{\rmi \frac{2\pi}{3}n}
f(\rme^{\rmi \frac{2\pi}{3}n}x,\alpha,\{s_{k+2n}\}),
}\hfill\end{gathered}$$ where the bar means the complex conjugation.
Riemann-Hilbert problem for $1+s_0s_1=0$
========================================
First of all observe that our RH problem can be transformed to an equivalent RH problem with the jump contour consisting of three branches, see Figure \[fig2\] (the method of transformation of Riemann-Hilbert graphs is explained in detail in [@its_kapaev3; @its_kapaev1]).
Let us assume now that $$\label{1+s0s1=0}
1+s_0s_1=0.$$ Constraints (\[s\_constraints\]) imply that $s_1-s_0=-2\sin\pi\alpha$ as well, so that $$\label{s13}
s_1=e^{-i\pi\sigma(\alpha+\frac{1}{2})},\quad
s_0=-1/s_1=e^{i\pi\sigma(\alpha-\frac{1}{2})},\quad
\sigma^2=1,$$ while the parameter $s_2$ remains arbitrary. Using (\[1+s0s1=0\]), it is straightforward to check that the jump matrices in the transformed jump graph in Figure \[fig2\] are as follows, $$\begin{gathered}
\label{S1S0S1}
(S_1S_0S_1)^{-1}=
\begin{pmatrix}
0&1/s_1\\-s_1&0
\end{pmatrix},\quad
\sigma_2(S_1S_0S_1)^{-1}\sigma_2=
\begin{pmatrix}
0&s_1\\-1/s_1&0
\end{pmatrix},
\\
\shoveleft{
S_1S_0S_1S_2\sigma_2S_1^{-1}\sigma_2=
\begin{pmatrix}
0&-1/s_1\\s_1&s_1(s_1+s_2)
\end{pmatrix}=
\begin{pmatrix}
0&-1/s_1\\
s_1&0
\end{pmatrix}
\begin{pmatrix}
1&s_1+s_2\\
0&1
\end{pmatrix}
},
\\
\sigma_2S_1S_0S_1S_2\sigma_2S_1^{-1}=
\begin{pmatrix}
s_1(s_1+s_2)&-s_1\\1/s_1&0
\end{pmatrix}=
\begin{pmatrix}
0&-s_1\\
1/s_1&0
\end{pmatrix}
\begin{pmatrix}
1&0\\
-s_1-s_2&1
\end{pmatrix}.\end{gathered}$$
For the connection matrix $E$ we have:
\[hatE\] $$\begin{gathered}
\label{hatEa}
\alpha-\tfrac{1}{2}\notin{\Bbb Z},\quad
J_+=J_-=0,\quad
M=e^{i\pi\alpha\sigma_3}i\sigma_1
\colon
\\
\begin{cases}
\sigma=-1,\quad
s_1=-e^{i\pi(\alpha-\frac{1}{2})}\colon\quad
ES_0^{-1}S_1^{-1}=p^{\sigma_3}
\begin{pmatrix}
1&0\\
\frac{s_1^2(s_1+s_2)}{1-s_1^2}&1
\end{pmatrix},
\\
\sigma=+1,\quad
s_1=-e^{-i\pi(\alpha-\frac{1}{2})}\colon\quad
ES_0^{-1}S_1^{-1}=p^{\sigma_3}
i\sigma_2
\begin{pmatrix}
1&0\\
\frac{s_1^2(s_1+s_2)}{1-s_1^2}&1
\end{pmatrix},
\end{cases}\end{gathered}$$ where $p$ is constant; $$\begin{gathered}
\label{hatEb}
\alpha-\tfrac{1}{2}=n\in{\Bbb Z},\quad
s_1=-s_0=(-1)^{n+1},\quad
M\,i\sigma_2=(-1)^nI
+J_{\pm}\sigma_{\pm}
\colon\quad
\\
\begin{cases}
n\in{\Bbb Z}_{<0},\quad
J_+=0,\quad
J_-\neq0\colon\quad
ES_0^{-1}S_1^{-1}=p^{\sigma_3}
\begin{pmatrix}
1&0\\
q&1
\end{pmatrix},
\\
n\in{\Bbb Z}_{\geq0},\quad
J_+\neq0,\quad J_-=0\colon\quad
ES_0^{-1}S_1^{-1}=p^{\sigma_3}i\sigma_2
\begin{pmatrix}
1&0\\ q&1
\end{pmatrix},
\end{cases}\end{gathered}$$
where $p$ and $q$ are constants.
If $\alpha-\frac{1}{2}=n\in{\Bbb Z}$ and $s_1=-s_0=(-1)^{n+1}$ then the condition $J_+=J_-=0$ is equivalent to the equation $s_2=(-1)^n$. On the one hand, these points have important geometrical meaning as being special points of the monodromy surface (\[s\_constraints\]). On the other hand, in this case, equation (\[E\_conditions\]) does not provide any restriction to the connection matrix $E$ which becomes arbitrary. Taking into account that, for $\alpha-\frac{1}{2}=n\in{\Bbb Z}$, the matrix $E$ is determined up to an upper or lower in dependence on the sign of $n$ triangular left multiplier, it contains one essential parameter which parameterizes a family of the (classical) Painlevé functions.
Case $\alpha-\frac{1}{2}\not\in{\Bbb Z}$ and $1+s_0s_1=0$ {#case_a-1/2_not_Z}
=========================================================
In the case of the non-special point of the monodromy surface, even for a half-integer $\alpha$, the entries of the connection matrix $E$ do not affect the Painlevé function, and thus the jump graph can be deformed to one depicted in Figure \[fig3\].
Here, $$\label{Sigma_def}
\Sigma=
\begin{pmatrix}
0&1/s_1\\
-s_1&0
\end{pmatrix},\quad
S_2S_4^{-1}=
\begin{pmatrix}
1&s_1+s_2\\
0&1
\end{pmatrix},$$ and other jump matrices are as above. For our convenience, we put the node points of the jump graph to the points $\lambda_{1,2}=\pm\sqrt{-x/2}$, $\arg x\in\bigl[\frac{2\pi}{3},\pi\bigr]$. It is worth to note that the jump graph consists of the level lines $\Im g(\lambda)=const$, $\Re g(\lambda)=const$ emanating from the critical points $\lambda=\pm\sqrt{-x/2}$ and $\lambda=0$ for the function $$\label{g-8_def}
g(\lambda)=i\tfrac{4}{3}\bigl(\lambda^2+\tfrac{x}{2}\bigr)^{3/2}.$$
The function $\Psi(\lambda)$ is normalized at infinity by the asymptotic condition (\[Psi\_at\_infty\]). Since we eliminate from the jump graph the circle around the origin, the asymptotics for $\Psi(\lambda)$ at the origin (\[Psi\_at\_0\]) has to be replaced by the condition $$\label{Psi_at_0_non_spec}
\bigl\|\Psi(\lambda)S_1S_0E^{-1}
\lambda^{-\alpha\sigma_3}\bigr\|\leq
\mbox{\rm const},\quad
\lambda\to+0.$$
The RH problem depends on the free parameter $s_2$ due to a jump across the imaginary axis. Using a quadratic change $\lambda^2=\xi$ supplemented by a gauge transformation of the $\Psi$-function, it is possible to obtain a disjoint jump graph. Unfortunately, unlike the cases considered in [@its_kapaev1; @kapaev2], in this case, one meets a difficulty with the normalization of the transformed RH problem which results in ambiguity in the asymptotics of the Painlevé transcendent. Thus we prefer to deal with the connected jump graph shown in Figure \[fig3\].
Reduced RH problem with $\bf 1+s_0s_1=s_1+s_2=0$.
-------------------------------------------------
Consider the non-special RH problem for $P_2$ corresponding to $1+s_0s_1=s_1+s_2=0$. Then the non-specialty assumption implies that $\alpha-\frac{1}{2}$ is not integer. The RH problem jump graph coincides with one depicted in Figure \[fig3\] except for the jump across the curve lines emanating from the origin and approaching the vertical direction since now $$S_2S_4^{-1}=\sigma_2S_2S_4^{-1}\sigma_2=I.$$
The reduced RH problem is formulated as follows: find a piece-wise holomorphic function $\hat\Psi(\lambda)$ such that
1. $\hat\Psi(\lambda)e^{\theta\sigma_3}\to I,\quad
\lambda\to\infty$;
2. $\bigl\|\hat\Psi_-(\lambda)S_1S_0E_0^{-1}
\lambda^{-\alpha\sigma_3}\bigr\|\leq
\mbox{\rm const},\quad
\lambda\to0$,where $E_0$ is the connection matrix $E$ defined in (\[hatE\]) corresponding to $s_1+s_2=0$;
3. $\hat\Psi(\lambda)$ is discontinuous across the contour shown in Figure \[fig3\] (with the trivial jumps across the lines emanating from the origin and approaching the vertical directions).
\[McLeod1\] Let $\arg x\in[\frac{2\pi}{3},\pi]$, $\alpha-\frac{1}{2}\notin{\Bbb Z}$ and $1+s_0s_1=s_1+s_2=0$. Then, for large enough $|x|$, there exists a unique solution to the reduced RH problem. If additionally the parameter $\sigma\in\{+1,-1\}$ is defined in such a way that $s_1=e^{-i\pi\sigma(\alpha+\frac{1}{2})}$ then the corresponding Painlevé function has the asymptotics $$\label{y1_def}
y(x)=y_1(x,\alpha,\sigma)=
\sigma\sqrt{e^{-i\pi}\tfrac{x}{2}}+{\cal O}(x^{-2/5}),\quad
|x|\to\infty,\quad
\arg x\in\bigl[\tfrac{2\pi}{3},\pi\bigr].$$
Uniqueness. Let the reduced RH problem admit two solutions $\hat\Psi_1(\lambda)$ and $\hat\Psi_2(\lambda)$. Since all the jump matrices are unimodular, their determinants $\det\hat\Psi_j(\lambda)$ are continues across the jump contour, bounded at the origin and therefor are entire functions. Using the Liouville theorem and the normalization of $\hat\Psi(\lambda)$ we conclude that $\det\hat\Psi_j(\lambda)\equiv1$. Therefore there exists the ratio $\chi(\lambda)=\hat\Psi_1(\lambda)\hat\Psi_2^{-1}(\lambda)$ which is continuous across the jump contour for $\hat\Psi_j(\lambda)$, remains bounded as $\lambda\to0$ and is normalized to the unit matrix as $\lambda\to\infty$. Therefore, by the Liouville theorem, $\chi(\lambda)\equiv I$.
Existence. Consider an RH problem on the curve line segment $[-\sqrt{-x/2},0)\cup(0,\sqrt{-x/2}]$, where $\arg\sqrt{-x/2}\in\bigl[-\frac{\pi}{6},0\bigr]$, see Figure \[fig3a\] (because $\Psi$-function can be analytically continued to ${\Bbb C}\backslash\{0\}$, the jump contours in the RH problem can be bent in any convenient way and even “kiss" the infinity), with the quasi-permutation jump matrices:
[**RH model problem 1.**]{}
1. $\Phi^0(\lambda)e^{\theta\sigma_3}\to I,\quad
\lambda\to\infty$;
2. $\bigl\|\Phi^0_-(\lambda)S_1S_0E_0^{-1}
\lambda^{-\alpha\sigma_3}\bigr\|\leq
\mbox{\rm const},\quad
\lambda\to0$;
3. $$\begin{aligned}
&\Phi^0_+(\lambda)=\Phi^0_-(\lambda)\sigma_2\Sigma\sigma_2,\quad
\lambda\in\bigl(-\sqrt{-x/2},0\bigr),
\\
&\Phi^0_+(\lambda)=\Phi^0_-(\lambda)\Sigma^{-1},\quad
\lambda\in\bigl(0,\sqrt{-x/2}\bigr),
\\
&\sigma_2\Sigma\sigma_2=
\begin{pmatrix}
0&s_1\\
-1/s_1&0
\end{pmatrix},\quad
\Sigma^{-1}=
\begin{pmatrix}
0&-1/s_1\\
s_1&0
\end{pmatrix}.\end{aligned}$$
A solution to this RH problem is found explicitly in [@IFK] in some different notations. Namely, on the complex $\lambda$-plane cut along $[-\sqrt{-x/2},\sqrt{-x/2}]$, define the following scalar and matrix functions $\beta,Y,\delta$: $$\label{beta_def}
\beta(\lambda)=\Bigl(
\frac{\lambda-\sqrt{-x/2}}{\lambda+\sqrt{-x/2}}
\Bigr)^{1/4},$$ whose branch is fixed by the condition $$\beta\to1\quad\text{as}\quad
\lambda\to\infty;$$ $$\label{Y_def}
Y(\lambda)=\frac{1}{2}
\begin{pmatrix}
\beta+\beta^{-1}&-\sigma(\beta-\beta^{-1})\\
-\sigma(\beta-\beta^{-1})&\beta+\beta^{-1}
\end{pmatrix}=
\tfrac{1}{\sqrt2}
\begin{pmatrix}
1&1\\1&-1
\end{pmatrix}
\beta^{-\sigma\sigma_3}
\tfrac{1}{\sqrt2}
\begin{pmatrix}
1&1\\1&-1
\end{pmatrix},$$ $$\label{delta_def}
\delta(\lambda)=\Bigl(
\frac{\sqrt{\lambda^2+\frac{x}{2}}-i\sqrt{-x/2}}
{\sqrt{\lambda^2+\frac{x}{2}}+i\sqrt{-x/2}}
\Bigr)^{\nu},\quad
\nu=-\frac{1}{2\pi i}\ln(i\sigma s_1)=\frac{\sigma\alpha}{2},$$ where the branch of the square root is fixed by its asymptotics $\sqrt{\lambda^2+\frac{x}{2}}=\lambda+{\cal O}(\lambda^{-1})$ as $\lambda\to+\infty$, and $z^{\nu}$ is defined on the plane cut along the negative part of the real axis and its main branch is chosen.
As easy to see, $$\label{delta_symm}
\delta(-\lambda)\delta(\lambda)=1.$$
Furthermore, the functions introduced above enjoy the following jump properties: $$\begin{aligned}
\label{Y_jump}
&Y_+(\lambda)=Y_-(\lambda)(-i\sigma)\sigma_1,\quad
\lambda\in\bigl(-\sqrt{-x/2},\sqrt{-x/2}\bigr),
\\\label{delta_jump}
&\delta_+(\lambda)\delta_-(\lambda)=e^{2\pi i\nu},\quad
\lambda\in\bigl(-\sqrt{-x/2},0\bigr),
\\
&\delta_+(\lambda)\delta_-(\lambda)=e^{-2\pi i\nu},\quad
\lambda\in\bigl(0,\sqrt{-x/2}\bigr),
\notag
\\\label{g_jump}
&g_+(\lambda)=-g_-(\lambda),\quad
\lambda\in\bigl(-\sqrt{-x/2},\sqrt{-x/2}\bigr).\end{aligned}$$ Therefore the function $$\label{Phi0_def}
\Phi^0=Y\delta^{\sigma_3}e^{-g\sigma_3}$$ satisfies the jump conditions of model RH problem 1.
Because of the asymptotics as $\lambda\to\infty$ $$\begin{aligned}
\label{beta_Y_delta_g_as8}
&\beta(\lambda)=1-\frac{1}{2\lambda}\sqrt{-x/2}+{\cal O}(\lambda^{-2}),
\notag
\\
&Y(\lambda)=I+\frac{1}{2\lambda}\sigma\sqrt{-\tfrac{x}{2}}\,\sigma_1
+{\cal O}(\lambda^{-2}),
\notag
\\
&\delta(\lambda)=1+{\cal O}(\lambda^{-2}),
\notag
\\
&g(\lambda)=i\bigl(
\tfrac{4}{3}\lambda^3+x\lambda\bigr)
+i\tfrac{x^2}{8\lambda}
+{\cal O}(\lambda^{-3}),\end{aligned}$$ we find the asymptotics as $\lambda\to\infty$ of $\Phi^0(\lambda)$, $$\label{Phi0_as8}
\Phi^0(\lambda)=\Bigl(
I+\tfrac{1}{2\lambda}
\bigl(-\tfrac{ix^2}{4}\sigma_3+\sigma\sqrt{-\tfrac{x}{2}}\,\sigma_1\bigr)
+{\cal O}(\lambda^{-2})\Bigr)
e^{-\theta\sigma_3}.$$ Using asymptotics as $\lambda\to0$, $$\begin{aligned}
\label{beta_Y_delta_g_as0}
&\beta_-(\lambda)=e^{-i\pi/4}+{\cal O}(\lambda),
\notag
\\
&Y_-(\lambda)=\frac{1}{\sqrt2}
\Bigl(I+i\sigma\sigma_1+{\cal O}(\lambda)\Bigr),
\notag
\\
&\delta_-(\lambda)=e^{-i\pi\nu}(-2x)^{\nu}\lambda^{-2\nu}
\bigl(1+{\cal O}(\lambda^2)\bigr),
\notag
\\
&g_-(\lambda)=-\tfrac{\sqrt2}{3}(-x)^{3/2}+\sqrt2(-x)^{1/2}\lambda^2
+{\cal O}(\lambda^4x^{-1/2}),\end{aligned}$$ it is easy to see that $$\label{Phi0_as0}
\Phi^0_-(\lambda)=C\bigl(I+{\cal O}(\lambda)\bigr)
\lambda^{-\sigma\alpha\sigma_3}$$ with some constant matrix $C$, therefore, using (\[hatEa\]), $\bigl\|\Phi^0_-(\lambda)S_1S_0E_0^{-1}
\lambda^{-\alpha\sigma_3}\bigr\|\leq\mbox{\rm const}$. Thus the function $\Phi^0(\lambda)$ (\[Phi0\_def\]) solves model RH problem 1.
\[quasi\_perm\] A similar quasi-permutation RH problem in an elliptic case is solved in [@its_kapaev3]. More general quasi-permutation RH problem is solved in [@korotkin].
For the subsequent discussion it is also worth to note that $$\label{Phi0_sym}
\sigma_2\Phi^0(-\lambda)\sigma_2=\Phi^0(\lambda).$$ We also point out that $\Phi^0(\lambda)$ is singular at $\lambda=\pm\sqrt{-x/2}$. To “smoothen" this singularity, let us consider the following
[**RH model problem 2.**]{} Find a piece-wise holomorphic function $\Phi(\lambda)$ with the jumps indicated in Figure \[fig3b\].
Since we do not normalize $\Phi(\lambda)$, it is determined up to a left multiplication in an entire matrix function. If we will use this solution in a domain different from ${\Bbb C}$, then $\Phi(\lambda)$ is determined up to a left multiplication in a matrix function holomorphic in this domain.
It is possible to construct a solution $\Phi(\lambda)$ of this model problem using the classical Airy functions. The Airy function $\Ai(z)$ can be defined using the Taylor expansion [@BE; @olver], $$\label{Ai}
\Ai(z)=\frac{1}{3^{2/3}\Gamma(\frac{2}{3})}
\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}
\frac{3^k\Gamma(k+\frac{1}{3})z^{3k}}{\Gamma(\frac{1}{3})(3k)!}
-\frac{1}{3^{1/3}\Gamma(\frac{1}{3})}
\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}
\frac{3^k\Gamma(k+\frac{2}{3})z^{3k+1}}{\Gamma(\frac{2}{3})(3k+1)!}.$$ Asymptotics at infinity of this function and its derivative are as follows, $$\begin{gathered}
\label{Ai_as}
\Ai(z)=\tfrac{z^{-1/4}}{2\sqrt\pi}e^{-\frac{2}{3}z^{3/2}}
\Bigl\{\sum_{n=0}^N(-1)^n3^{-2n}
\frac{\Gamma(3n+\frac{1}{2})}{\Gamma(\frac{1}{2})(2n)!}z^{-\frac{3n}{2}}
+{\cal O}\bigl(z^{-\frac{3}{2}(N+1)}\bigr)\Bigr\},
\\
\Ai'(z)=-\tfrac{z^{1/4}}{2\sqrt\pi}e^{-\frac{2}{3}z^{3/2}}
\Bigl\{\sum_{n=0}^N(-1)^{n+1}3^{-2n}\bigl(3n+\tfrac{1}{2}\bigr)
\frac{\Gamma(3n-\frac{1}{2})}{\Gamma(\frac{1}{2})(2n)!}z^{-\frac{3n}{2}}
+{\cal O}\bigl(z^{-\frac{3}{2}(N+1)}\bigr)
\Bigr\},
\\
\text{as}\quad
z\to\infty,\quad
\arg z\in(-\pi,\pi).\end{gathered}$$
Introduce the matrix function $Z_0(\lambda)$, $$\label{Z0_def}
Z_0(\lambda)=\sqrt{2\pi}\,e^{-i\pi/4}
\begin{pmatrix}
v_2(z)&v_1(z)\\
\frac{d}{dz}v_2(z)&\frac{d}{dz}v_1(z)
\end{pmatrix}e^{-i\frac{\pi}{4}\sigma_3},$$ where $$\label{Airy_notations}
v_2(z)=e^{i2\pi/3}Ai(e^{i2\pi/3}z),\quad
v_1(z)=Ai(z).$$ As $|z|\to\infty$, $\arg z\in\bigl(-\pi,\frac{\pi}{3}\bigr)$, this function has the asymptotics $$\label{Z_0_as}
Z_0(z)=z^{-\sigma_3/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt2}
\begin{pmatrix}
1&1\\
1&-1
\end{pmatrix}
\Bigl(I+{\cal O}(z^{-3/2})\Bigr)
e^{\frac{2}{3}z^{3/2}\sigma_3}.$$ Also, introduce the matrix functions $$\begin{gathered}
\label{Airies}
Z_1(z):=Z_0(z)G_0,\quad
Z_2(z):=Z_1(z)G_1,\quad
Z_3(z):=Z_2(z)G_2,
\\
\shoveleft{
G_0=G_2=
\begin{pmatrix}
1&0\\
-i&1
\end{pmatrix},\quad
G_1=
\begin{pmatrix}
1&-i
\\
0&1
\end{pmatrix}.
}\hfill\end{gathered}$$ By the properties of the Airy functions [@BE; @olver], $Z_j(z)$ have the asymptotics (\[Z\_0\_as\]) as $z\to\infty$ and $\arg z\in\bigl(-\pi+\frac{2\pi}{3}j,\frac{\pi}{3}+\frac{2\pi}{3}j\bigr)$, $j=0,1,2,3$.
Define a piece-wise holomorphic function $Z^{RH}(z)$, $$\label{RH_Airy}
Z^{RH}(z)=\begin{cases}
Z_0(z)(is_1)^{\sigma_3/2},\quad
\arg z\in\bigl(-\frac{\pi}{3},0),\\
Z_j(z)(is_1)^{\sigma_3/2},\quad
\arg z\in\bigl(-\frac{2\pi}{3}+\frac{2\pi}{3}j,\frac{2\pi}{3}j\bigr),
\quad
j=1,2,\\
Z_3(z)(is_1)^{\sigma_3/2},\quad
\arg z\in\bigl(\frac{4\pi}{3},\frac{5\pi}{3}).
\end{cases}$$ By construction, $Z^{RH}(z)$ has the uniform asymptotics $$\label{Z_RH_as}
Z^{RH}(z)=z^{-\sigma_3/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt2}
\begin{pmatrix}
1&1\\
1&-1
\end{pmatrix}
\Bigl(I+{\cal O}(z^{-3/2})\Bigr)
e^{\frac{2}{3}z^{3/2}\sigma_3}
(is_1)^{\sigma_3/2},\quad
z\to\infty,$$ and jump properties indicated in Figure \[fig5\].
Using the change of the independent variable $$\label{z(lambda)}
z=e^{i\pi}2^{2/3}\bigl(\lambda^2+\frac{x}{2}\bigr),$$ and the notation $$\label{zeta_def}
\zeta:=\lambda-\sqrt{-x/2},$$ we compute the “ratio" of $\Phi^0$ and $Z^{RH}$ in the annulus $c_1|x|^{-\frac{1}{2}+\epsilon}\leq|\zeta|\leq c_2|x|^{-\frac{1}{2}+\epsilon}$, where $0<c_1<c_2$ and $\frac{1}{4}<\epsilon<\frac{1}{2}$ are some constants, $$\begin{gathered}
\label{Phi0_Z_ratio}
\Phi^0(\lambda)\bigl(Z^{RH}(z)\bigr)^{-1}=
\Bigl(I+{\cal O}\bigl(x^{-1/4}\zeta^{1/2}\bigr)
+{\cal O}\bigl(x^{-1/2}\zeta^{-2}\bigr)\Bigr)
\times
\\
\times\tfrac{1}{\sqrt2}
\begin{pmatrix}
1&1\\1&-1
\end{pmatrix}
\Bigl(\frac{1-\sigma}{2}i\sigma_1
+\frac{1+\sigma}{2}I\Bigr)
e^{i\frac{\pi}{4}\sigma_3}
2^{\frac{2}{3}\sigma_3}
(-x/2)^{\sigma_3/4}.\end{gathered}$$
Define the matrix function $\Phi_r(\lambda)$, $$\label{Phir_def}
\Phi_r(\lambda)=
\tfrac{1}{\sqrt2}
\begin{pmatrix}
1&1\\1&-1
\end{pmatrix}
\Bigl(\frac{1-\sigma}{2}i\sigma_1
+\frac{1+\sigma}{2}I\Bigr)
e^{i\frac{\pi}{4}\sigma_3}
2^{\frac{2}{3}\sigma_3}
(-x/2)^{\sigma_3/4}
Z^{RH}\bigl(z(\lambda)\bigr).$$
Let us introduce the piece-wise holomorphic function $\Phi(\lambda)$, $$\label{Phi_def}
\Phi(\lambda)=
\begin{cases}
\Phi_r(\lambda),\quad
\bigl|\lambda-\sqrt{-x/2}\bigr|<R,\\
\sigma_2\Phi_r(e^{-i\pi}\lambda)\sigma_2,\quad
\bigl|\lambda+\sqrt{-x/2}\bigr|<R,\\
\Phi^0(\lambda),\quad
\bigl|\lambda\pm\sqrt{-x/2}\bigr|>R,
\end{cases}$$ where $R=c|x|^{-\frac{1}{2}+\epsilon}$ for a constant $c>0$ and $\frac{1}{4}<\epsilon<\frac{1}{2}$. We look for the exact solution of the reduced RH problem in the form of the product $$\label{chi_red_def}
\hat\Psi(\lambda)=\chi(\lambda)\Phi(\lambda).$$ The correction function $\chi(\lambda)$ solves the RH problem whose jump graph is shown in Figure \[fig6\].
The jump matrix across the circle centered at $\lambda=\sqrt{-x/2}$ is given by the ratio $\Phi^0(\lambda)\Phi_r^{-1}(\lambda)$ which, due to (\[Phi0\_Z\_ratio\]), (\[Phir\_def\]) and choosing $\epsilon=2/5$, satisfies the estimate $$\label{jump_r_circle}
\bigl\|\Phi^0(\lambda)\Phi_r^{-1}(\lambda)-I\bigr\|\leq
c|x|^{-3/10}.$$ The jump matrices across the exterior parts of infinite contours approach the unit matrices exponentially fast, $$\label{jump_tails}
\bigl\|\Phi^0(\lambda)S_j\bigl(\Phi^0(\lambda)\bigr)^{-1}-I\bigr\|\leq
C|x|^{3/20}e^{-\frac{2^{15/4}}{3}|x|^{3/4}|\zeta|^{3/2}}.$$
Now, the solvability of the reduced RH problem is straightforward. Indeed, consider the system of singular integral equations $\chi_-=I+K\chi_-$ equivalent to the RH problem for $\chi(\lambda)$, $$\label{chi_singular_integral}
\chi_-(\lambda)=I+\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{\gamma}\chi_-(\xi)
\bigl(G(\xi)-I\bigr)\frac{d\xi}{\xi-\lambda_-},$$ where $\gamma$ is the contour shown in Figure \[fig6\] and $G(\lambda)=\Phi_-(\lambda)S_j\Phi_+^{-1}(\lambda)$ is the relevant jump matrix. Using the estimates (\[jump\_r\_circle\]), (\[jump\_tails\]) and the boundedness of the Cauchy operator in $L^2(\gamma)$, the singular integral operator $K$, which is a superposition of the operator of the right multiplication in $G(\lambda)-I$ and of the Cauchy operator $C_-$, satisfies the estimate, $\bigl\|K\bigr\|_{L^2(\gamma)}\leq c|x|^{-2/5}$, where the precise value of the positive constant $c$ is not important for us. Thus $K$ is a contracting operator in $L^2(\gamma)$ for large enough $|x|$. Since $KI$ is a square integrable function on $\gamma$, and observing that $\rho=\chi_--I$ satisfies the singular integral equation $\rho=KI+K\rho$, we find $\rho\in L^2(\gamma)$ and therefore $\chi_-=I+\rho$ by iterations.
The solution found by iterations implies the asymptotics of $\chi(\lambda)$ as $\lambda\to\infty$, $$\label{chi_as}
\chi(\lambda)=I+\frac{1}{\lambda}{\cal O}(x^{-2/5})
+{\cal O}(\lambda^{-2}).$$ Using (\[chi\_as\]) and (\[Phi0\_as8\]) in (\[chi\_red\_def\]) and taking into account the expansion (\[Y\_expansion\]), we see that the Painlevé function corresponding to the reduced RH problem has the asymptotics as $|x|\to\infty$, $\arg x\in\bigl[\frac{2\pi}{3},\pi\bigr]$, $$\label{y_as}
y(x)=\sigma\sqrt{e^{-i\pi}\frac{x}{2}}+{\cal O}(x^{-2/5}).$$ This completes the proof.
RH problem with $\bf 1+s_0s_1=0$ and $\bf s_1+s_2\neq0$.
--------------------------------------------------------
Let us go to the case of $1+s_0s_1=0$ and arbitrary $s_1+s_2\neq0$, see Figure \[fig3\]. We look for the solution $\Psi(\lambda)$ in the form of the product $$\label{hat_chi_def}
\Psi(\lambda)=\hat\chi(\lambda)\hat\Psi(\lambda),$$ where $\hat\Psi(\lambda)$ is the solution of the reduced RH problem, i.e.with $s_1+s_2=0$.
The correction function $\hat\chi(\lambda)$ satisfies the RH problem on two level lines $\Im g(\lambda)=const$ emanating from the origin and approaching the vertical direction, see Figure \[fig7\],
1. $\hat\chi(\lambda)\to I,\quad
\lambda\to\infty$;
2. $\bigl\|\hat\chi(\lambda)\hat\Psi(\lambda)S_1S_0E^{-1}
\lambda^{-\alpha\sigma_3}\bigr\|\leq\mbox{\rm const},\quad
\lambda\to+0$;
3. $\hat\chi_+(\lambda)=\hat\chi_-(\lambda)\hat G(\lambda)$,
$\hat G(\lambda):=\hat G_1(\lambda)=
\hat\Psi_-(\lambda)S_2S_4^{-1}\hat\Psi_-^{-1}(\lambda),\quad
\lambda\in(0,+i\infty)$,
$\hat G(\lambda):=\hat G_2(\lambda)=
\hat\Psi_-(\lambda)\sigma_2S_2S_4^{-1}\sigma_2\hat\Psi_-^{-1}(\lambda),\quad
\lambda\in(0,-i\infty)$,
$\sigma_2\hat G_1(-\lambda)\sigma_2=\hat G_2(\lambda)$.
\[McLeod2\] If $\alpha-\frac{1}{2}\notin{\Bbb Z}$, $1+s_0s_1=0$, $\arg x\in[\frac{2\pi}{3},\pi]$ and $|x|$ is large enough, then the RH problem (\[Psi\_at\_infty\])–(\[E\_conditions\]) is uniquely solvable. The asymptotics of the corresponding Painlevé function as $|x|\to\infty$ in the indicated sector is given by $$\begin{gathered}
\label{mcleod-_as}
y=y_1(x,\alpha,\sigma)-
\\
-\frac{s_1+s_2}{\pi}
2^{-\frac{5}{2}\sigma\alpha-\frac{7}{4}}
\Gamma(\tfrac{1}{2}+\sigma\alpha)
(e^{-i\pi}x)^{-\frac{3}{2}\sigma\alpha-\frac{1}{4}}
e^{-\frac{2\sqrt2}{3}(e^{-i\pi}x)^{3/2}}
\bigl(1+{\cal O}(x^{-1/4})\bigr),\end{gathered}$$ where $y_1(x,\alpha,\sigma)\sim\sigma\sqrt{e^{-i\pi}x/2}$ is the solution of the Painlevé equation corresponding to $1+s_0s_1=s_1+s_2=0$, while the parameter $\sigma\in\{+1,-1\}$ is defined by the use of the equation $s_1=e^{-i\pi\sigma(\alpha+\frac{1}{2})}$.
It is enough to prove the solvability of the RH problem for $\hat\chi(\lambda)$ above. In a neighborhood of the imaginary axis, $\hat\Psi(\lambda)=\chi(\lambda)\Phi^0(\lambda)$, see (\[chi\_red\_def\]) and (\[Phi\_def\]). Hence, using (\[Phi0\_def\]), we have the following expression for the jump matrix across $(0,+i\infty)$,
\[hat\_G12\] $$\begin{aligned}
\label{hat_G1}
&\hat G_1(\lambda)=I+(s_1+s_2)\delta^2e^{-2g}\chi Y\sigma_+Y^{-1}\chi^{-1},
\\\label{hat_G2}
&\hat G_2(\lambda)=I-(s_1+s_2)\delta^{-2}e^{2g}\chi Y\sigma_-Y^{-1}\chi^{-1}.\end{aligned}$$
Because the jump contour coincides with the level line $\Im g(\lambda)=const$, the jump matrix $\hat G_1(\lambda)$ exponentially approaches the unit matrix as $\lambda\to+i\infty$. Similarly, $\hat G_2(\lambda)-I$ decreases exponentially as $\lambda\to-i\infty$. For the exponential $e^{g(\lambda)}$, due to (\[beta\_Y\_delta\_g\_as0\]), the origin is the saddle point.
The jump matrices have algebraic singularity at $\lambda=0$,
\[hat\_G12\_at0\] $$\begin{aligned}
\label{hat_G1_at0}
&\hat G_1(\lambda)=I+(s_1+s_2)e^{-2\pi i\nu}
(-2x)^{-2\nu}\lambda^{4\nu}
e^{-\frac{2\sqrt2}{3}(-x)^{3/2}+2\sqrt2(-x)^{1/2}\lambda^2}\times
\notag
\\
&\times
\tfrac{1}{2}(i\sigma\sigma_3+\sigma_1)
\bigl(1+{\cal O}(\lambda)+{\cal O}(x^{-9/10})\bigr),
\\\label{hat_G2_at0}
&\hat G_2(\lambda)=I-(s_1+s_2)
e^{2i\pi\nu}(-2x)^{-2\nu}\lambda^{4\nu}
e^{-\tfrac{2\sqrt2}{3}(-x)^{3/2}+2\sqrt2(-x)^{1/2}\lambda^2)}\times
\notag
\\
&\times
\tfrac{1}{2}(i\sigma\sigma_3+\sigma_1)
\bigl(1+{\cal O}(\lambda)+{\cal O}(x^{-9/10})\bigr).\end{aligned}$$
Consider the model RH problem with the jump matrices $\tilde G_j(\lambda)$, $j=1,2$, of the form (\[hat\_G12\]) but with the matrix $\chi(\lambda)Y(\lambda)$ replaced by its asymptotics at $\lambda=0$, i.e.
\[tilde\_G12\] $$\begin{aligned}
\label{tilde_G1}
&\tilde G_1(\lambda)=I+(s_1+s_2)\delta^2e^{-2g}
\tfrac{1}{2}(i\sigma\sigma_3+\sigma_1),
\\\label{tilde_G2}
&\tilde G_2(\lambda)=I-(s_1+s_2)\delta^{-2}e^{2g}
\tfrac{1}{2}(i\sigma\sigma_3+\sigma_1).\end{aligned}$$
Assume for a moment that $$\label{nu>=0}
\Re\nu\geq0,\quad
\text{i.e.}\quad
\Re(\sigma\alpha)\geq0.$$ Since $\tilde G_j(\lambda)-I$ are constant nilpotent matrices multiplied in scalar functions, solution of the jump problem is given by the Cauchy integral, $$\begin{gathered}
\label{tilde_chi_sol}
\tilde\chi(\lambda)=I+\frac{s_1+s_2}{2\pi i}
\Bigl\{
\int_0^{+i\infty}
\delta^2e^{-2g}
\frac{d\zeta}{\zeta-\lambda}
+\int_{-i\infty}^0
\delta^{-2}e^{2g}
\frac{d\zeta}{\zeta-\lambda}
\Bigr\}
\tfrac{1}{2}(i\sigma\sigma_3+\sigma_1)=
\\
=I+\frac{s_1+s_2}{2\pi i}
\int_0^{+i\infty}
\delta^2e^{-2g}
\frac{\lambda\,d\zeta}
{\zeta^2-\lambda^2}
(i\sigma\sigma_3+\sigma_1).\end{gathered}$$ The condition (\[nu>=0\]) ensures the convergence of the above integrals. Obviously, $\tilde\chi(\lambda)\to I$ as $\lambda\to\infty$. As to asymptotics at the origin, the same condition (\[nu>=0\]) ensures that $\bigl\|\tilde\chi(\lambda)\bigr\|\leq\mbox{\rm const}$, and $\bigl\|\tilde\chi(\lambda)\hat\Psi(\lambda)S_1S_0E^{-1}
\lambda^{-\alpha\sigma_3}\bigr\|\leq\mbox{\rm const}$.
We will look for $\hat\chi(\lambda)$ in the form of the product $$\label{X_def}
\hat\chi(\lambda)=X(\lambda)\tilde\chi(\lambda).$$ For the correction function $X(\lambda)$, we have the RH problem with the jump contour shown in Figure \[fig7\], but with different jump matrices:
1. $X(\lambda)\to I,\quad
\lambda\to\infty$;
2. $\bigl\|X(\lambda)\bigr\|\leq\mbox{\rm const},\quad
\lambda\to+0$;
3. $X_+(\lambda)=X_-(\lambda)H(\lambda)$,$H(\lambda)=\tilde\chi_-(\lambda)\hat G(\lambda)\tilde
G^{-1}(\lambda)\tilde\chi_-^{-1}(\lambda)$.
In the equivalent singular integral equation, $$\label{X_sing_eq}
X_-(\lambda)=I+\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{\gamma}
X_-(\zeta)\bigl(H(\zeta)-I\bigr)\frac{d\zeta}{\zeta-\lambda_-},$$ where $\gamma$ is the jump graph in Figure \[fig7\] and $\lambda_-$ is the right limit of $\lambda$ on the jump contour, or, in the symbolic form, $X_-=I+KX_-$, the operator $K$ is the superposition of the right multiplication in $H-I$ and of the Cauchy operator $C_-$. Using the boundedness of $C_-$ in $L^2(\gamma)$, we estimate the norm $$\label{K_H-I_norm}
\bigl\|K\bigr\|_{L^2(\gamma)}\leq
c\bigl\|H-I\bigr\|_{L^2(\gamma)}\leq
c'|x|^{-(5\nu+1)/2}e^{-\frac{8}{3}|x|^{3/2}\cos\frac{3}{2}(\arg x-\pi)}\leq
c''|x|^{-1/2},$$ where $c$, $c'$ and $c''$ are positive constants whose precise value is not important for us. Taking into account the assumption $\Re\nu\geq0$ (\[nu>=0\]), the singular integral operator $K$ is contracting for large enough $|x|$, $\arg x\in\bigl[\frac{2\pi}{3},\pi\bigr]$, and therefore equation (\[X\_sing\_eq\]) is solvable by iterations.
To find the asymptotics of the relevant Painlevé function, it is enough to find asymptotics of $\tilde\chi(\lambda)$ (\[tilde\_chi\_sol\]) as $\lambda\to\infty$, $$\begin{gathered}
\label{tilde_chi_as}
\tilde\chi(\lambda)=I-\frac{s_1+s_2}{2\pi i\lambda}
\int_0^{+i\infty}\delta^2e^{-2g}\,d\zeta
\bigl(1+{\cal O}(\lambda^{-2})\bigr)
(i\sigma\sigma_3+\sigma_1)=
\\
=I+\lambda^{-1}h(i\sigma\sigma_3+\sigma_1)+{\cal O}(\lambda^{-3}),
\\
h=-\frac{s_1+s_2}{2\pi}
2^{-5\nu-\frac{7}{4}}
\Gamma(2\nu+\tfrac{1}{2})
(-x)^{-3\nu-\frac{1}{4}}
e^{-\frac{2\sqrt2}{3}(-x)^{3/2}}
\bigl(1+{\cal O}(x^{-1/2})\bigr).\end{gathered}$$ Thus the asymptotics of $\Psi(\lambda)$ as $\lambda\to\infty$ (\[Y\_expansion\]) is given by $$\begin{gathered}
\label{Psi_as_s1+s2ne0}
\Psi(\lambda)e^{\theta\sigma_3}=X\tilde\chi\hat\Psi e^{\theta\sigma_3}=
I+\lambda^{-1}\bigl(-i{\Eu H}\sigma_3+\frac{y}{2}\sigma_1\bigr)+
{\cal O}(\lambda^{-2})=
\\
=
I+\lambda^{-1}\Bigl(
-i({\Eu H}_2-\sigma\hat h_3)\sigma_3
+\frac{y_1+2\hat h_1}{2}\sigma_1
\Bigr)+
{\cal O}(\lambda^{-2}),\end{gathered}$$ where $\hat h_j=h\bigl(1+{\cal O}(x^{-2\nu-1/4})\bigr)$, $j=3,1$, involves the contribution of the correction function $X(\lambda)$. Comparison of two lines in (\[Psi\_as\_s1+s2ne0\]) yields the asymptotics of the Painlevé function, $y=y_1+2\hat h_1$, which turns into (\[mcleod-\_as\]) for $\Re(\sigma\alpha)\geq0$, $\alpha-\frac{1}{2}\notin{\Bbb Z}$ substituting $\nu=\sigma\alpha/2$.
Validity of the asymptotic formula (\[mcleod-\_as\]) without the restriction (\[nu>=0\]) follows from the observation that (\[mcleod-\_as\]) is invariant with respect to Bäcklund transformations. Indeed, the Schlesinger transformation of the $\Psi$-function, $$\begin{gathered}
\label{Schlesinger}
\tilde\Psi(\lambda)=R(\lambda)\Psi(\lambda),
\\
R(\lambda)=I
-\frac{q_{\epsilon}}{2i\lambda}(\sigma_3-i\epsilon\sigma_1),\quad
q_{\epsilon}=
\frac{\alpha+\frac{\epsilon}{2}}{y_x-\epsilon(y^2+\frac{x}{2})},\quad
\epsilon\in\{+1,-1\},\end{gathered}$$ yields the $\Psi$-function, associated to a new Painlevé transcendent $$\label{Backlund}
\tilde y=y+\epsilon q_{\epsilon},\quad
\tilde y_x=y_x+\epsilon(\tilde y^2-y^2),\quad
\tilde\alpha=-\alpha-\epsilon,$$ characterized however by the same Stokes multipliers. The latter with the definition of the parameter $\sigma$ via $s_1=e^{-i\pi\sigma(\alpha+\frac{1}{2})}=
\tilde s_1=e^{-i\pi\tilde\sigma(\tilde\alpha+\frac{1}{2})}$ implies the transformation of the parameter $\sigma$, $\tilde\sigma=-\sigma$ for either value of $\epsilon=\pm1$. If both $\Re(\sigma\alpha)\geq0$ and $\Re(\tilde\sigma\tilde\alpha)=\Re(\sigma\alpha)+\sigma\epsilon\geq0$, then the asymptotics of both $y$ and $\tilde y$ is described by (\[mcleod-\_as\]) (supplemented by tilde over $y$, $\sigma$ and $\alpha$ if necessary). This observation constitutes the invariance of the asymptotic formula with respect to the Bäcklund transformation. Since the latter transformation is a bi-rational transformation in the space with coordinates $(y,y_x)$, the above invariance can be confirmed algebraically. Therefore, if $\Re(\tilde\sigma\tilde\alpha)<0$ while $\Re(\sigma\alpha)\geq0$, the asymptotics of $\tilde y$ and $y$ are described by the formula (\[mcleod-\_as\]) (supplemented by tilde if necessary). The iterated use of the Bäcklund transformations completes the proof.
The increasing degenerate Painlevé functions
--------------------------------------------
Applying the second of the symmetries (\[P\_symmetries\]) to (\[mcleod-\_as\]) and changing the argument of $x$ in $2\pi$, we obtain
\[McLeod3\] If $\alpha-\frac{1}{2}\notin{\Bbb Z}$, $1+s_0s_1=0$, $\arg x\in[\pi,\frac{4\pi}{3}]$ and $|x|$ is large enough, then the asymptotics of the Painlevé function is given by $$\begin{gathered}
\label{mcleod-bar_as}
y=y_0(x,\alpha,\sigma)-
\\
-\frac{s_2-s_0}{\pi}
2^{-\frac{5}{2}\sigma\alpha-\frac{7}{4}}
\Gamma(\tfrac{1}{2}+\sigma\alpha)
(e^{-i\pi}x)^{-\frac{3}{2}\sigma\alpha-\frac{1}{4}}
e^{-\frac{2\sqrt2}{3}(e^{-i\pi}x)^{3/2}}
\bigl(1+{\cal O}(x^{-1/4})\bigr),\end{gathered}$$ where $y_0(x,\alpha,\sigma)=\overline{y_1(\bar x,\bar\alpha,\sigma)}
\sim\sigma\sqrt{e^{-i\pi}x/2}$ is the solution of the Painlevé equation corresponding to $1+s_0s_1=s_2-s_0=0$, while the parameter $\sigma\in\{+1,-1\}$ is defined by the use of the equation $s_1=e^{-i\pi\sigma(\alpha+\frac{1}{2})}$.
The solutions $y_1(x,\alpha,\sigma)$ and $y_0(x,\alpha,\sigma)=\overline{y_1(\bar x,\bar\alpha,\sigma)}$ are meromorphic functions of $x\in{\Bbb C}$ and thus can be continued beyond the sectors indicated in Theorems \[McLeod2\] and \[McLeod3\]. To find the asymptotics of the solution $y_0(x,\alpha,\sigma)$ in the interior of the sector $\arg x\in[\frac{2\pi}{3},\pi]$, we apply (\[mcleod-\_as\]) with $s_2=s_0$. Similarly, we find the asymptotics of the solution $y_1(x,\alpha,\sigma)$ in the interior of the sector $\arg x\in[\pi,\frac{4\pi}{3}]$ using (\[mcleod-bar\_as\]) with $s_2=-s_1$. Either expression implies that, if $|x|\to\infty$, $\arg x\in[\frac{2\pi}{3},\frac{4\pi}{3}]$, $$\begin{gathered}
\label{y0-y1}
y_0(x,\alpha,\sigma)-y_1(x,\alpha,\sigma)=
\\
=i\sigma
\frac{2^{-\frac{5}{2}\sigma\alpha-\frac{3}{4}}}
{\Gamma(\tfrac{1}{2}-\sigma\alpha)}
(e^{-i\pi}x)^{-\frac{3}{2}\sigma\alpha-\frac{1}{4}}
e^{-\frac{2\sqrt2}{3}(e^{-i\pi}x)^{3/2}}
\bigl(1+{\cal O}(x^{-1/4})\bigr),\end{gathered}$$ where we have used the relation $$(s_0+s_1)\Gamma\bigl(\tfrac{1}{2}+\sigma\alpha\bigr)=
-\frac{2i\pi\sigma}{\Gamma\bigl(\tfrac{1}{2}-\sigma\alpha\bigr)}.$$ The formula (\[y0-y1\]) constitutes the quasi-linear Stokes phenomenon for the increasing degenerate asymptotic solution of $P_2$.
Due to exponential decay of the difference (\[y0-y1\]) in the interior of the sector $\arg x\in\bigl(\frac{2\pi}{3},\frac{4\pi}{3}\bigr)$, we have solutions of $P_2$, $$\begin{gathered}
\label{y0_ext1}
y=y_1(x,\alpha,\sigma)\simeq\sigma\sqrt{e^{-i\pi}x/2},\quad
|x|\to\infty,\quad
\arg x\in\bigl[\tfrac{2\pi}{3},\tfrac{4\pi}{3}\bigr),
\\
\text{for}\quad
s_0=-e^{i\pi\sigma(\alpha+\frac{1}{2})},\quad
s_1=e^{-i\pi\sigma(\alpha+\frac{1}{2})},\quad
s_2=-e^{-i\pi\sigma(\alpha+\frac{1}{2})},\end{gathered}$$ and $$\begin{gathered}
\label{y1_ext0}
y=y_0(x,\alpha,\sigma)\simeq\sigma\sqrt{e^{-i\pi}x/2},\quad
|x|\to\infty,\quad
\arg x\in\bigl(\tfrac{2\pi}{3},\tfrac{4\pi}{3}\bigr],
\\
\text{for}\quad
s_0=-e^{i\pi\sigma(\alpha+\frac{1}{2})},\quad
s_1=e^{-i\pi\sigma(\alpha+\frac{1}{2})},\quad
s_2=-e^{i\pi\sigma(\alpha+\frac{1}{2})}.\end{gathered}$$
Applying the rotational symmetry of (\[P\_symmetries\]) to $y_1$ and $y_0$, we find solutions $$\begin{gathered}
\label{y_2n+1_def}
y=y_{2n+1}(x,\alpha,\sigma):=
e^{i\frac{2\pi}{3}n}y_1(e^{i\frac{2\pi}{3}n}x,\alpha,\sigma)\simeq
\sigma(-1)^n\sqrt{e^{-i\pi}x/2},
\\
|x|\to\infty,\quad
\arg x\in\bigl[\tfrac{2\pi}{3}-\tfrac{2\pi}{3}n,
\tfrac{4\pi}{3}-\tfrac{2\pi}{3}n\bigr),
\\
\text{for}\quad
s_{2n}=-e^{i\pi\sigma(\alpha+\frac{1}{2})},\quad
s_{2n+1}=e^{-i\pi\sigma(\alpha+\frac{1}{2})},\quad
s_{2n+2}=-e^{-i\pi\sigma(\alpha+\frac{1}{2})},\end{gathered}$$ and $$\begin{gathered}
\label{y_2n_def}
y=y_{2n}(x,\alpha,\sigma):=
e^{i\frac{2\pi}{3}n}y_0(e^{i\frac{2\pi}{3}n}x,\alpha,\sigma)\simeq
\sigma(-1)^n\sqrt{e^{-i\pi}x/2},
\\
|x|\to\infty,\quad
\arg x\in\bigl(\tfrac{2\pi}{3}-\tfrac{2\pi}{3}n,
\tfrac{4\pi}{3}-\tfrac{2\pi}{3}n\bigr],
\\
\text{for}\quad
s_{2n}=-e^{i\pi\sigma(\alpha+\frac{1}{2})},\quad
s_{2n+1}=e^{-i\pi\sigma(\alpha+\frac{1}{2})},\quad
s_{2n+2}=-e^{i\pi\sigma(\alpha+\frac{1}{2})}.\end{gathered}$$
Comparing the Stokes multipliers, we observe the symmetries $$\label{y_n_symm}
y_n(x,\alpha,\sigma)=y_{n+6}(x,\alpha,\sigma),\quad
y_{2n-1}(x,\alpha,\sigma)=y_{2n}(x,\alpha,-\sigma).$$ Equation (\[y0-y1\]) and definitions (\[y\_2n+1\_def\]) and (\[y\_2n\_def\]) imply the differences take place, $$\begin{gathered}
\label{y_2n+1-y_2n}
y_{2n}(x,\alpha,\sigma)-y_{2n+1}(x,\alpha,\sigma)=
\\
=i\sigma
\frac{2^{-\frac{5}{2}\sigma\alpha-\frac{3}{4}}}
{\Gamma(\tfrac{1}{2}-\sigma\alpha)}
e^{i\frac{2\pi}{3}n}
(e^{-i\pi}e^{i\frac{2\pi}{3}n}x)^{-\frac{3}{2}\sigma\alpha-\frac{1}{4}}
e^{-\frac{2\sqrt2}{3}(e^{-i\pi}e^{i\frac{2\pi}{3}n}x)^{3/2}}
\bigl(1+{\cal O}(x^{-1/4})\bigr),
\\
|x|\to\infty,\quad
\arg
x\in\bigl[\tfrac{2\pi}{3}-\tfrac{2\pi}{3}n,
\tfrac{4\pi}{3}-\tfrac{2\pi}{3}n\bigr],\end{gathered}$$ which are exponentially small in the interior of the indicated sectors.
Using the second of the equations (\[y\_n\_symm\]), we establish the analytic continuation of the asymptotics as $|x|\to\infty$, $$\begin{gathered}
\label{max_as_sect}
y_{2n-1}(x,\alpha,(-1)^{n-1}\sigma)=y_{2n}(x,\alpha,(-1)^n\sigma)\simeq
\sigma\sqrt{e^{-i\pi}x/2},
\\
|x|\to\infty,\quad
\arg x\in\bigl(\tfrac{2\pi}{3}(1-n),\tfrac{2\pi}{3}(3-n)\bigr).\end{gathered}$$
Coefficient asymptotics for $\alpha-\frac{1}{2}\not\in{\Bbb Z}$
===============================================================
An elementary investigation shows that the equation $P_2$, $y_{xx}=2y^2+xy-\alpha$, can be satisfied by the formal series depending on $\alpha$ and a parameter $\sigma=\pm1$, $$\label{mcleod-formal}
y_f(x,\alpha,\sigma)=
\sigma\sqrt{-x/2}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}b_n(-x)^{-3n/2}
+{\cal O}(x^{-\infty}).$$ Given $\sigma$, the series (\[mcleod-formal\]) is determined uniquely since its coefficients $b_n$ are determined by the recurrence relation, $$\begin{gathered}
\label{bn_recurrence}
b_0=1,\quad
b_1=\frac{\sigma\alpha}{\sqrt2},
\\
b_{n+2}=\frac{9n^2-1}{8}b_{n}
-\sum_{m=1}^{n+1}b_mb_{n+2-m}
-\frac{1}{2}\sum_{l=1}^{n+1}\sum_{m=1}^{n+2-l}b_lb_mb_{n+2-l-m}.\end{gathered}$$ Several initial terms of the expansion are given by $$\begin{gathered}
\label{mcleod_expansion}
y_f(x,\alpha,\sigma)=\sigma\sqrt{-x/2}\Bigl\{1+
\frac{\sigma\alpha}{\sqrt2(-x)^{3/2}}
-\frac{1+6\alpha^2}{8(-x)^{3}}
+\frac{\sigma\alpha(11+16\alpha^2)}{8\sqrt2(-x)^{9/2}}-
\\
-\frac{73+708\alpha^2+420\alpha^4}{128(-x)^{6}}
+\frac{\sigma\alpha(1021+2504\alpha^2+768\alpha^4)}
{64\sqrt2(-x)^{15/2}}-
\\
-\frac{10657+129918\alpha^2+132060\alpha^4+24024\alpha^6}
{1024(-x)^{9}}+
\\
+\frac{\sigma\alpha(248831+786304\alpha^2+416400\alpha^4+49152\alpha^6)}
{512\sqrt2(-x)^{21/2}}
+{\cal O}\bigl(x^{-12}\bigr)\Bigr\}.\end{gathered}$$
To find the asymptotics of the coefficients $b_n$ in (\[mcleod-formal\]) as $n\to\infty$, let us construct a sectorial analytic function $\hat y(t)$, $$\begin{gathered}
\label{hat_mcleod}
\hat y(t)=y_{2n-1}(e^{i\pi}t^2,\alpha,(-1)^{n-1}\sigma)
=y_{2n}(e^{i\pi}t^2,\alpha,(-1)^n\sigma),
\\
|t|\to\infty,\quad
\arg t\in\bigl(-\tfrac{\pi}{3}n,
\tfrac{\pi}{3}-\tfrac{\pi}{3}n\bigr).\end{gathered}$$ The function $\hat y(x)$ has a finite number of simple poles and, by construction, has the uniform asymptotics near infinity, $\hat y(t)\simeq\sigma t/\sqrt2$ as $|t|\to\infty$. Using (\[mcleod-formal\]), it has the following formal series expansion, $$\label{mcleod_hat_y_expansion}
\hat y(t)=
\sigma\frac{t}{\sqrt2}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}b_nt^{-3n}.$$
Let $y^{(N)}(x)$ be a partial sum $$\label{mcleod_yN}
y^{(N)}(t)=\sigma\frac{t}{\sqrt2}\sum_{n=0}^{N-1}b_nt^{-3n},$$ and $v^{(N)}(t)$ be a product $$\label{mcleod_vn}
v^{(N)}(t)=t^{3N-2}(\hat y(t)-y^{(N)}(t))=
\frac{\sigma}{t\sqrt2}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}b_{n+N}t^{-3n}.$$ Because $t^{3N-2}y^{(N)}(t)$ is polynomial and $\hat y(t)/t$ is bounded as $|t|\geq\rho$, the integral of $v^{(N)}(t)$ along the circle of the radius $|t|=\rho$ containing all the pole singularities of $\hat y(t)$ satisfies the estimate $$\label{mcleod_vN_integral}
\Bigl|\oint_{|t|=\rho}v^{(N)}(t)\,dt\Bigr|\leq
\rho^{3N-2}\oint_{|t|=\rho}|\hat y(t)|\,dl\leq
2\pi\rho^{3N}\max_{|t|=\rho}|\hat y(t)/t|=C\rho^{3N}.$$ On the other hand, inflating the sectorial arcs of the circle $|t|=\rho$, we find that $$\label{mcleod_vN_inflation}
\oint_{|t|=\rho}v^{(N)}(t)\,dx=\oint_{|t|=R}v^{(N)}(t)\,dt
+\sum_{n=-3}^2\int_{e^{i\frac{\pi}{3}n}(\rho,R)}\bigl(
v_+^{(N)}(t)-v_-^{(N)}(t)\bigr)\,dt.$$
Since $v^{(N)}(t)=\frac{\sigma}{t\sqrt2}b_N+{\cal O}(t^{-3})$, the first of the integrals in the r.h.s. of (\[mcleod\_vN\_inflation\]) is $$\label{bN_int}
\oint_{|x|=R}v^{(N)}(t)\,dt=\pi i\sigma\sqrt{2}\,b_N+{\cal O}(R^{-2}).$$ Last six integrals in (\[mcleod\_vN\_inflation\]) are computed using (\[hat\_mcleod\]), (\[y\_2n+1\_def\]), (\[y\_2n\_def\]), (\[y\_n\_symm\]) and (\[y0-y1\]), $$\begin{gathered}
\label{bN_eval}
\sum_{n=-3}^2\int_{e^{i\frac{\pi}{3}n}(\rho,R)}\bigl(
v_+^{(N)}(t)-v_-^{(N)}(t)\bigr)\,dt=
\\
=3\int_{\rho}^R t^{3N-2}\bigl(
y_0(e^{i\pi}t^2,\alpha,\sigma)
-y_1(e^{i\pi}t^2,\alpha,\sigma)\bigr)\,dt+
\\
+3(-1)^{N-1}\int_{\rho}^R t^{3N-2}\bigl(
y_0(e^{i\pi}t^2,\alpha,-\sigma)
-y_1(e^{i\pi}t^2,\alpha,-\sigma)\bigr)\,dt=
\\
=3i\sigma
\frac{2^{-\frac{5}{2}\sigma\alpha-\frac{3}{4}}}
{\Gamma(\tfrac{1}{2}-\sigma\alpha)}
\int_{\rho}^R
t^{3(N-\sigma\alpha)-\frac{5}{2}}
e^{-\frac{2\sqrt2}{3}t^3}
\bigl(1+{\cal O}(t^{-1/2})\bigr)\,dt+
\\
+3(-1)^{N}i\sigma
\frac{2^{\frac{5}{2}\sigma\alpha-\frac{3}{4}}}
{\Gamma(\tfrac{1}{2}+\sigma\alpha)}
\int_{\rho}^R
t^{3(N+\sigma\alpha)-\frac{5}{2}}
e^{-\frac{2\sqrt2}{3}t^3}
\bigl(1+{\cal O}(t^{-1/2})\bigr)\,dt=
\\
=i\sigma
2^{-\frac{3}{2}N}
3^{N-\frac{1}{2}}
\Bigl\{
6^{-\sigma\alpha}
\frac{\Gamma(N-\sigma\alpha-\tfrac{1}{2})}
{\Gamma(\tfrac{1}{2}-\sigma\alpha)}
\bigl(1+{\cal O}(N^{-1/6})\bigr)+
\\
+(-1)^N
6^{\sigma\alpha}
\frac{\Gamma(N+\sigma\alpha-\tfrac{1}{2})}
{\Gamma(\tfrac{1}{2}+\sigma\alpha)}
\bigl(1+{\cal O}(N^{-1/6})\bigr)
\Bigr\}
+
\\
+{\cal O}(\rho^{3(N+|\mbox{\tiny\rm Re}\alpha|)-\frac{3}{2}})
+{\cal O}\bigl(e^{-\frac{2\sqrt2}{3}R^3}
R^{3(N+|\mbox{\tiny\rm Re}\alpha|)-\frac{9}{2}}\bigr).\end{gathered}$$ Thus, letting $R=\infty$, we find the asymptotics as $N\to\infty$ of the coefficient $b_N$ in (\[mcleod-formal\]), $$\begin{gathered}
\label{bn_fin}
b_N=-\frac{1}{\pi\sqrt{6}}
\Bigl(\frac{3}{2\sqrt2}\Bigr)^N
\Bigl\{
6^{-\sigma\alpha}
\frac{\Gamma(N-\sigma\alpha-\tfrac{1}{2})}
{\Gamma(\tfrac{1}{2}-\sigma\alpha)}
\bigl(1+{\cal O}(N^{-1/6})\bigr)+
\\
+(-1)^N
6^{\sigma\alpha}
\frac{\Gamma(N+\sigma\alpha-\tfrac{1}{2})}
{\Gamma(\tfrac{1}{2}+\sigma\alpha)}
\bigl(1+{\cal O}(N^{-1/6})\bigr)
\Bigr\}
+{\cal O}(\rho^{3N}).\end{gathered}$$ In particular, the asymptotics (\[bn\_fin\]) is consistent with the elementary observation that, for $\alpha=0$, all odd coefficients vanish, $b_{2n-1}=0$; for even coefficients, the leading order asymptotics reduces to the one-term expression, i.e. $$\begin{gathered}
\label{bn_fin_a=0}
\text{if}\quad
\alpha=0\colon\quad
b_{2N-1}=0,
\\
b_{2N}=-\frac{\sqrt2}{\pi^{3/2}\sqrt{3}}
\Bigl(\frac{3}{2\sqrt2}\Bigr)^{2N}
\Gamma(2N-\tfrac{1}{2})
\bigl(1+{\cal O}(N^{-1/6})\bigr)
+{\cal O}(\rho^{3N}).\end{gathered}$$
\[mcleod\_err\_bound\] The error bound in (\[mcleod-\_as\]), (\[mcleod-bar\_as\]) and (\[y0-y1\]) can be improved to ${\cal O}(x^{-3/2})$ which implies the error bound for (\[bn\_fin\]) ${\cal O}(N^{-1})$.
\[alpha=1/2+n\] It is possible to prove that the asymptotic formula (\[bn\_fin\]) remains valid for half-integer values of $\alpha$ as well.
The author was supported in part by the RFBR, grant No. 02–01–00268. He also thanks Prof. A.R. Its for stimulating discussions.
[References]{} E.L. Ince, [*Ordinary Differential Equations*]{}, Dover, New York, 1956.
M.J. Ablowitz and H. Segur, Asymptotic solutions of the Korteweg-de Vries equation, [*Stud. Appl. Math.*]{} [**57**]{} (1977) no. 1, 13-44; M.J. Ablowitz, H. Segur, Exact linearization of a Painlevé transcendent, [*Phys. Rev. Lett.*]{} [**38**]{} (1977) 1103-1106.
S.P. Hastings and J.B. McLeod, A boundary value problem associated with the second Painlevé transcendent and the Korteweg-de Vries equation, [*Arch. Rational Mech. Anal.*]{} [**73**]{} (1980) 31-51.
V.E. Zakharov, E.A. Kuznetsov and S.L. Musher, [*JETP Lett.*]{} [**41**]{} (1985) no. 3, 125-127.
G.J.M. Marée, Slow passage through a pitchfork bifurcation, [*SIAM J. Appl. Math.*]{} [**56**]{} (1996) 889-918.
C.A. Tracy and H. Widom, Level-spacing distributions and the Airy kernel, [*Phys. Lett. B*]{} [**305**]{} (1993) no. 1-2, 115-118; [*Comm. Math. Phys.*]{} [**159**]{} (1994) no. 1, 151-174.
C.A. Tracy and H. Widom, Random unitary matrices, permutations and Painlevé, [*Comm. Math. Phys.*]{} [**207**]{} (1999) no. 3, 665-685.
P. Bleher and A. Its, Double scaling limit in the random matrix model: the Riemann-Hilbert approach, [*Comm. Pure Appl.Math.*]{} [**56**]{} (2003) no. 4, 433-516.
A.A. Kapaev, Global asymptotics of the fourth Painlevé transcendent, [*POMI Preprint*]{} [**6/1996**]{}, 1996; [*Steklov Math. Inst. and IUPUI Preprint*]{} \# 96-5, 1996.
P. Boutroux, Recherches sur les transcendantes de M. Painlevé et l’etude asymptotique des équations différentielles du second ordre. [*Ann. Sci. Ecol. Norm.Supér.*]{} [**30**]{} (1913) 255-376; [**31**]{} (1914) 99-159.
A. A. Kapaev, Asymptotics of solutions of the Painlevé equation of the first kind, [*Diff. Eqns.*]{} [**24**]{} (1989) 1107-1115.
A. A. Kapaev, Global asymptotics of the second Painlevé transcendent, [*Physics Letters A*]{}, [**167**]{} (1992) 356-362.
A.R. Its and A.A. Kapaev, Quasi-linear Stokes phenomenon for the second Painlevé transcendent, [*Nonlinearity*]{} [**16**]{} (2003), no. 1, 363-386;
A.A. Kapaev, Riemann-Hilbert problem approach to the “physical” solution of the Painlevé first equation. nlin.SI/0404026
M. Jimbo, T. Miwa and K. Ueno, Monodromy preserving deformation of linear ordinary differential equations with rational coefficients, [*Physica D*]{}, [**2**]{} (1981), 306-352;
M. Jimbo and T. Miwa, Monodromy preserving deformation of linear ordinary differential equations with rational coefficients. II, [*Physica D*]{}, [**2**]{} (1981), 407-448;
[to3em]{}Monodromy preserving deformation of linear ordinary differential equations with rational coefficients. III, [*Physica D*]{}, [**4**]{} (1981), 26-46.
H. Flaschka and A. C. Newell, Monodromy- and spectrum-preserving deformations I, [*Comm. Math. Phys.*]{} [**76**]{} (1980) 65-116.
A. R. Its and V. Yu. Novokshenov, The Isomonodromic Deformation Method in the Theory of Painlevé Equations, [*Lect.Notes Math.*]{} [**1191**]{} Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York-Tokyo, 1986, 1-313.
P.A. Deift and X. Zhou, A steepest descent method for oscillatory Riemann-Hilbert problems. Asymptotics for the MKdV equation, [*Ann. of Math.*]{} [**137**]{} (1995) 295-368.
A.S. Fokas and M.J. Ablowitz, On the initial value problem of the second Painlevé transcendent. [*Comm. Math.Phys.*]{}, [**91**]{} (1983) 381-403.
A.S. Fokas and X. Zhou, On the Solvability of Painlevé II and IV. [*Comm. Math. Phys.*]{}, [**144**]{} (1992) 601-622.
A.R. Its, A.S. Fokas and A.A. Kapaev, On the asymptotic analysis of the Painlevé equations via the isomonodromy method, [*Nonlinearity*]{}, [**7**]{} (1994) 1291-1325.
A.R. Its and A.A. Kapaev, The nonlinear steepest descent approach to the asymptotics of the second Painlevé transcendent in the complex domain, [*MathPhys odyssey, 2001*]{}, 273-311, [*Prog. Math. Phys.*]{} [**23**]{}, Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 2002.
A.A. Kapaev, The essential singularity of the Painlevé function of the second kind and the nonlinear Stokes phenomenon, [*Zapiski Nauch. Seminarov LOMI*]{} [**187**]{} (1991) 139-170.
D. Korotkin, Matrix Riemann-Hilbert problems related to branched coverings of ${\Bbb CP}^1$, [*arXiv: math-ph/0106009*]{}, 2001
H. Bateman and A. Erdelyi, [*Higher Transcendental Functions*]{}, McGraw-Hill, NY, 1953.
F.W.J. Olver, [*Asymptotics and special functions*]{}, Academic Press, New York, 1974.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'In this article we extend the currently established diffusion theory of spin-dependent electrical conduction by including spin-dependent thermoelectricity and thermal transport. Using this theory, we propose new experiments aimed at demonstrating novel effects such as the spin-Peltier effect, the reciprocal of the recently demonstrated thermally driven spin injection, as well as the magnetic heat valve. We use finite-element methods to model specific devices in literature to demonstrate our theory. Spin-orbit effects such as anomalous-Hall, -Nernst, anisotropic magnetoresistance and spin-Hall are also included in this model.'
author:
- Abraham Slachter
- Frank Lennart Bakker
- Bart Jan van Wees
title: 'Thermal spin transport and spin-orbit interaction in ferromagnetic/non-magnetic metals'
---
Introduction
============
Spintronics uses the spin degree of freedom to demonstrate new functionality in ferromagnetic/non-magnetic hybrid devices[@Zutic]. In time, many new functional devices have been proposed[@Slonczewski; @Brataasspinpump; @Hirsch] and measured[@Kiselev; @Costachespinpump; @Saitoh; @Valenzuela] utilizing the special properties of spin transport. Recently, the coupling between thermoelectricity and spin transport has been added to this field. New applications resulting from this coupling are summarized under the branch called spin-caloritronics[@BauerSpinCaloritronics; @Heikkila; @Saitoh; @Jaworski; @Uchida2; @Jansen; @Tulaparkur2; @Giazotto].
A diffusive transport theory for spin-dependent electrical conduction is currently well established[@Mott; @Valet]. This theory has been extended to non-collinear systems[@BrataasNCME; @Tserkovnyakrevmodphys] which becomes relevant when spin-dependent tunneling through interfaces is considered or to quantify dynamic processes such as spin-transfer torque[@Chappert] or spin-pumping[@Tserkovnyakspinpump; @Brataasspinpump].
In this article, we extend the collinear theory of diffusive transport for spin-dependent conduction to include spin-dependent thermoelectricity[@Johnson3; @Wegrowe; @Gravier2], spin-orbit effects[@Valenzuela; @Kimura; @Slachter2] and also spin-dependent thermal transport. We use finite-element methods to demonstrate our theory in order to extract useful parameters from complex three-dimensional device geometries[@Bakker; @Slachter]. Various recent experiments are taken from literature to extract the parameters which govern the effects.
The setup of this article is as follows. In section II, we begin with a description of finite-element modeling where we specify the structure of the model and the solvers used. In Section III we describe how to make finite-element-models which describe electrical spin-transport. We illustrate this model by calculating a recent example from literature[@Yang]. We also show how the direct and inverse spin-Hall effect can be included and use it to model an experiment by Kimura et al.[@Kimura]. A thermoelectric model which excludes spin is described in section IV where it is shown how spin-orbit effects can be included[@Bakker; @Slachter2].
In section V, we introduce the thermoelectric-spin model. This model can describe the individual effects related to thermoelectricity or spin-dependent electrical transport. However, the introduction of spin-dependent thermoelectric coefficients also allows to demonstrate two new physical effects: the recently demonstrated thermal spin injection[@Slachter] and its Onsager reciprocal effect: the spin-Peltier effect. Thermal spin injection describes the injection of spins in a non-magnetic material when a heat current is sent through a ferromagnetic/non-magnetic interface. The spin-Peltier effect describes spin-dependent heat transport across this interface due to the injection of spins in the ferromagnetic material.
In section VI, a phenomenological theory for spin-dependent heat transport is proposed, where the concept of a spin temperature is introduced and the thermal analogy of the spin valve: the magnetic heat valve[@Heikkila]. We apply the model on a previously measured sample[@Slachter2] to determine an upper limit for the relaxation of spin-dependent heat at room temperature. Thermoelectricity not only connects spin-dependent charge transport to heat transport but also connects spin-dependent heat transport to charge transport. This provides new ways to generate spin temperatures and to detect these.
We conclude this article with a discussion on how the spin-dependent effects can be described by a theory which includes tunneling through interfaces or non-collinear magnetizations[@Hatami].
Finite-element modeling
=======================
The finite-element modeling in this article is performed using the software package Comsol Multiphysics (version 3.5). It solves partial differential equations (PDE’s) for 1, 2 or 3 dimensional geometries defined in a CAD drawing program. In a diffusive transport theory, the PDE’s are determined by the conservation of the generalized currents for the physics considered. These can be formally derived from Boltzmann transport theory[@Valet; @Zhang]. The fluxes, put into a vector by $\vec J = \left(J_{u_{1}},J_{u_{2}},...\right)$, are governed by a vector of continuous variables $\vec u = \left(u_{1},u_{2},...\right)$ through the conductance matrix $\bar c$:
$$\label{eq2:Comsol1}
\vec J = - \bar c ~\nabla \vec u$$
Depending on the dimensionality *n* (1D, 2D or 3D) of the finite-element model, the elements of the fluxes $J_{u_{1}},J_{u_{2}},...$ are vectors themselves of size *n*. They determine the currents in the respective directions defined by the coordinate system of the model. The elements of the conductance matrix $\bar c_(i,j)$ are then $n\times n$ matrices. For an isotropic model, these are scalar matrices while for anisotropic transport the elements can be different. The PDE’s in the bulk are determined by the conservation of fluxes:
$$\label{eq2:Comsol2}
\vec \nabla \cdot \vec J = \vec f\left(\vec u\right)$$
Where a source term $\vec f\left(\vec u\right)$ exists which may depend on the variables themselves. As an example, for simple electrical transport $\vec u=V$, $\vec J = J_{c}$, $\bar c=\sigma$ and $f$=0. Here $V$ is the voltage, $J_{c}$ the charge current and $\sigma$ the electrical conductivity. Eq. \[eq2:Comsol1\] then states Ohm’s law while Eq. \[eq2:Comsol2\] is the Poisson equation representing the conservation of charge. The system under consideration is solved by stating the boundary conditions. These can be set for each variable (a Dirichlet condition) or flux (a Neumann condition) individually. In our example of electrical conduction, a charge current can be sent through the material by setting the charge current to a specific value at one interface and the voltage to a specific value at another. The outer interfaces are insulating $J_{c}$=0 and the currents are continuous across internal interface $J_{c}|_{1}$ = $J_{c}|_{2}$.
A (tetrahedral) mesh of typical 300k elements is created by the finite-element program where specific detailed meshing is often used in the areas of interest by specifying a minimal element size. The PDE’s are solved using a built-in (non-linear) solver which uses the iterative generalized minimal residual solver (FGMRES) with a geometric multigrid preconditioner, which in its turn uses a a direct sparse object-oriented linear equations solver (SPOOLES).
The models we use are generally non-linear and the device on which the model is based is measured electrically. Therefore, the resulting measurable voltage is also non-linear:
$$\label{eq2:R1R2factors}
V=R_{1}I+R_{2}I^{2}+R_{3}I^{3}+...$$
The contributions $R_{n} (V/A^{n})$ to the nonlinear voltage can be separately determined from experiments. By using multiple lock-in systems which are set to measure the different responses $\omega$, 2$\omega$, 3$\omega$ resulting from a sinusoidal charge current $I$ of frequency $\omega$ sent through the device, it is possible to determine these contributions[@Slachter]. We may extract them from the constructed model by studying how the simulated voltages depend on the applied charge current. The nonlinear contributions $R_{n} (V/A^{n})$ are determined by calculating the model at currents of $\pm I$ and $\pm 2I$ and deriving these contributions. Here $I$ is typically of a size used in experiments where all interesting contributions $R_{n} (V/A^{n})$ are considerable.
Spin transport
==============
Spin-dependent electron transport in systems consisting of collinear magnetizations and clean ferromagnetic/non-magnetic interfaces is commonly described in terms of a 2-channel model. First suggested by Mott[@Mott], and later derived from the Boltzmann transport theory[@Valet], it describes electrical conductance separately for spin-up ($\uparrow$) electrons, the component parallel to a magnetization, and spin-down electrons ($\downarrow$), the antiparallel component. Each channel has its own conductivity $\sigma_{\uparrow,\downarrow}$, voltage $V_{\uparrow,\downarrow}$ and charge current $J_{\uparrow,\downarrow}$. Usually a simplified resistor model is employed to describe spin-dependent transport. While it is sufficient for many approximations, it can become inaccurate for complex three-dimensional structures[@Kimura2].
Spin-dependent transport can be modeled by a set of PDE’s by using the spin-dependent voltages as variables $\vec u$ = $\left(V_{\uparrow},V_{\downarrow}\right)$. The spin dependent currents $\vec J$ = $\left(J_{\uparrow},J_{\downarrow}\right)$ are then defined by the spin-dependent conductance matrix:
$$\label{eq2:spinconductance}
\bar c = \left(\begin{array}{cc} \sigma_{\uparrow} & 0 \\ 0 & \sigma_{\downarrow}\end{array}\right)$$
The conservation of charge current is given by $\vec \nabla\cdot\left(\vec J_{\uparrow}+\vec J_{\downarrow}\right)=0$. The Valet-Fert equation $\nabla^{2} (V_{\uparrow}-V_{\downarrow}) = \frac{V_{\uparrow}-V_{\downarrow}}{\lambda^{2}}$ is derived from the conservation of spin currents. Defining a spin polarization for electrical conductance P$_{I} = (\sigma_{\uparrow}-\sigma_{\downarrow}) / (\sigma_{\uparrow}+\sigma_{\downarrow})$ we find a source term:
$$\label{eq2:sourceterm2channelmodel}
\vec f=\frac{(1-P_{I}^{2})\sigma}{4\lambda^{2}}(V_{\uparrow}-V_{\downarrow})\cdot\left(\begin{array}{c} -1 \\ 1\end{array}\right).$$
![\[fig2:1\] (Color online) Results of the modeling of the non-local spin valve structure used by Yang[@Yang] et al. a) A spin current is injected into the Cu bar which connects two ferromagnets FM$_{1}$, FM$_{2}$ by sending a charge current I$_{1-2}$ = 1 mA. The injected spins diffuse towards FM$_{2}$ where they are absorbed. The color shows a calculation of spin voltage $V_{s}=V_{\uparrow}-V_{\downarrow}$ at I$_{1-2}$ = 1 mA for the structure with a 4 nm thin ferromagnet FM$_{2}$. b) Calculated spin valve signal V$_{3-4}$/I$_{1-2}$ (m$\Omega$) versus the spin polarization for electrical conductance for a 20 nm thick FM$_{2}$. The grey area shows the measured spread.](fig1.pdf){width="8.8cm"}
The inputs for this model are the specific geometry, the conductivity $\sigma=\sigma_{\uparrow}+\sigma_{\downarrow}$, spin relaxation length $\lambda$ and spin polarization $P_{I}$. These parameters can be determined from various experiments. For example, the relaxation length of non-magnetic materials can be determined by varying the distance between two ferromagnet materials in a spin valve or measuring spin precession[@Jedema; @Jedema2]. The relaxation length of ferromagnets can be determined by angle-resolved photoemission[@Petrovykh], while the conductance polarization of ferromagnets can be investigated by measuring the Doppler shift of spin-waves[@Vlaminck].
While the model typically works well for pillar structures with clean interfaces[@Yang], in lateral systems the model generally overestimates the observable spin-valve signals[@Kimura3]. This is because it is often necessary to perform ion-milling prior to deposition to obtain ohmic interfaces. This is taken into account in the modeling by using a reduced conductance polarization of the ferromagnet P$_{I}$. For example, for a permalloy (Ni$_{80}$Fe$_{20}$) ferromagnet commonly used in a lateral spin valve, the polarization is reduced from 70%, determined from measured Doppler shifts, to 30-50%[@Jedema; @Kimura3].
An example of the application of this model can be found in Bakker[@Bakker]. Another example of where this model can be applied is shown by Yang[@Yang] et al. Here, the non-local spin valve geometry[@Johnson; @Jedema] is used to inject a spin current $ J_{\uparrow}-J_{\downarrow}$ free of charge current (a so-called pure spin current) into a thin ferromagnet. The magnetization of this magnet is switched by the resulting spin-transfer torque[@Chappert; @Slonczewski]. A threshold exists for this process given in terms of the charge current which should be sent through the device.
A model of this device geometry with resulting spin voltage is shown in Fig. \[fig2:1\]. Using the measured conductances, relaxation length of copper $\lambda_{Cu}$ = 1$\mu$m and spin valve signals, we determine an effective spin polarization of P$_{I}\approx$0.6 from the measured spin valve signals 9-21 m$\Omega$ from a batch of samples with thick ferromagnets. By performing an integration of the spin current flowing through the FM$_{2}$/NM interface, we find that the amount of pure spin current injected into the second ferromagnet I$_{s}$ is 13% of the total charge current $I$ sent through the device. Using an effective formula for spin-transfer torque switching[@Sun] we find that the ferromagnet should switch at I$_{s}$=930$\mu$A using common parameters[@Costachespinpump] where in the experiment the required charge current I=5mA results in a a spin current of I$_{s}$=675$\mu$A. Considering the empirical spread found for spin valve signals, this is very reasonable.
Because the electrical current density spread throughout the device is modeled, the Biot-Savart law also allows to calculate the magnetic fields present in the device. The magnetic fields at position $\vec r$ is determined by performing a volume integral over the entire device:
$$\label{eq2:BiotSavart}
\vec B (\vec r_{0})= \frac{\mu_{0}}{4\pi}\int\frac{\vec J_{c}\times(\vec r-\vec r_{0})}{|\vec r-\vec r_{0}|^{3}} d\vec r$$
Here $\mu_{0}$ is the magnetic vacuum permeability. We find that the magnetic field at the center of the switchable ferromagnet is $|\vec B|$ = 1.2 mT at the maximum applied charge current of 5 mA while the switching field of the magnet is 8 mT. This directly rules out that the magnetization switches by the induced magnetic fields, but it can be responsible for observed asymmetries in the spin-transfer torque switching process.
Spin-Hall Effect
----------------
Spin-orbit effects in ferromagnets are often sizeable due to their complex band alignment. As a result, measurements on spin-orbit effects in ferromagnets were already reported more then a century ago. First D’Yakanov and Perel[@DYakanov] and later Hirsch[@Hirsch] suggested that the same process which governed these effects in ferromagnets, whether it be due to band alignment (intrinsic) or spin-dependent scattering (extrinsic), can also be responsible for a new effect in paramagnetic materials: the spin-Hall effect[@Kato; @Valenzuela].
The direct spin-Hall effect describes that when a charge current $J_{c}$ is sent through a material with strong spin-orbit interaction, a spin current $J_{s}$ flows away from the center of the conductor with its spin direction $\vec m$, a unity vector, perpendicular to the charge and spin current. In the indirect version, a spin current flowing through the material creates a voltage perpendicular to the spin and spin current direction. Based on a Boltzmann transport theory derived by Zhang[@Zhang], the effects are governed by the following two equations:
$$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq2:spinhall}
\vec\nabla V^{SH}&=-\frac{\theta_{SH}}{\sigma} \vec m\times \vec J_{s}\\
\vec\nabla V_{s}^{ISH}&=\frac{\theta_{SH}}{\sigma} \vec m\times \vec J_{c}\end{aligned}$$
![\[fig2:2\] (Color online) Calculated spin voltages V$_{s}$ ($\mu$V) for the device of Kimura[@Kimura] et al. a) In the direct spin-Hall configurations a charge current I$_{1-2}$ = 1 mA is sent from ferromagnet to copper arm and the resulting spin-Hall voltage V$_{3-4}$ is measured on the Pt strip. b) XZ cross section in the middle of the platinum strip in the indirect spin-Hall configuration. The charge current I$_{3-4}$ = 50 $\mu$A is short-circuited by the copper strip which is why most spin accumulation enters through the corners. When the spin voltage enters the copper strip it is only a small fraction of the $\pm 8 \mu$V spin voltage present in the bulk platinum. The voltage V$_{1-2}$ is now measured by converting the spin voltage V$_{s}$ to a charge voltage at the FM/NM interface.](fig2.pdf){width="8.8cm"}
Here $\vec\nabla V^{SH}$ and $\vec\nabla V_{s}^{ISH}$ are the bulk charge and spin voltages resulting from the direct and indirect spin-Hall effect and $\theta_{SH}$ is the spin-Hall angle, typically a small fraction of one. Both effects can be included into the 2-channel model. To do this, we rewrite both equations into spin-up and spin-down currents and obtain the new spin-dependent conductance matrix:
$$\label{eq2:spinhallmatrix}
\bar c = \left(\begin{array}{cc} \sigma_{\uparrow} & \sigma_{\uparrow}^{SH} \\ \sigma_{\downarrow}^{SH} & \sigma_{\downarrow}\end{array}\right)$$
Where non-diagonal elements $\sigma_{\uparrow,\downarrow}^{SH}$ are included. These become skew-symmetric matrices determined by the spin-direction $\vec m$ considered in the device:
$$\label{eq2:spinhallnondiagonallelements}
\sigma_{\uparrow,\downarrow}^{SH}(i,j)=\mp \theta_{SH} \sigma_{\uparrow,\downarrow}\sum_{k}\varepsilon_{ijk}m_{k}$$
Here (i,j,k) are the indices of the predefined xyz axes and $\varepsilon_{ijk}$ is the Cevi-Levita symbol.
To demonstrate the theory, we model a device measured by Kimura[@Kimura] et al. where both the direct and indirect spin-Hall effect were measured in a single nanoscale device at room temperature for the first time. The results from this model are shown in Fig. \[fig2:2\]. The device consists of a single permalloy ferromagnet which is connected to a 4 nm thin platinum strip by a copper cross. A pure spin current can be injected into the platinum strip by sending a charge current I$_{1-2}$ from the ferromagnet to one of the arms of the copper cross. When the magnetization of the ferromagnet is aligned in the $\pm$y-direction, the spin current flowing into the platinum in the -z direction creates a voltage due to the indirect spin-Hall effect in the x-direction. This voltage can be measured between the two contacts present on the platinum strip. In the same device, sending a charge current through the platinum strip creates a spin current flowing in the z-direction where the spins are aligned in the $\pm$y-direction, which is now due to the direct spin-Hall effect. When this spin current arrives at the permalloy strip, it is converted into a voltage which can be electrically measured.
Both the direct and indirect spin-Hall signal in this device is around 60 $\mu\Omega$ at room temperature at a distance of 400 nm from platinum strip to ferromagnet. Using the common parameters P$_{Py}$=0.3, $\lambda_{Py}$ = 5 nm, $\lambda_{Pt}$ = 2 nm and $\lambda_{Cu}$ = 350 nm[@Jedema; @Kimura2; @Kimura3] and the measured conductivities, we find that a spin-Hall angle of $\theta_{SH}$ = 5$\cdot10^{-2}$ accurately produces both signals. This angle is around 8 times smaller then previously deduced. The difference lies somewhat in the used parameters, which are different, but mostly in the modeling which takes into account effects which the resistor model does not. For example, when a charge current is sent through the contacts connected to the platinum strip, the charge current mostly goes through the copper on top of the platinum strip instead of the platinum strip itself, which is due to the high conductivity of the copper. Copper is expected to have virtually no spin-Hall effect which reduced the observed voltage. We calculate that only 1% of the charge current goes fully through the platinum strip. A similar effect also occurs for the indirect spin-Hall effect. When a spin current is injected into the platinum strip, the produced voltage is also short-circuited by the copper strip. This example clearly demonstrates the need for a three-dimensional model to accurately predict the relevant parameters.
Thermoelectricity
=================
Ferromagnetism of typical (metallic) ferromagnets used in spintronic experiments originates from the electronic band structure. This band structure varies more strongly than those of the non-magnetic parts due to ferromagnetically induced shifts in the s- and d-bands. The Mott-formula[@Cutler] describes that thermoelectricity is strongest when the electrical conductivity varies strongly around the Fermi energy. Since this variation is dependent on the band structure, the ferromagnets used in spintronic experiments are good thermoelectric materials[@Barnard]. A model of thermoelectricity is therefore highly required to explain the voltages observed in nanoscale devices[@Bakker; @Slachter2] and can also be used to demonstrate new physics[@Slachter].
A bulk thermoelectric theory based on Boltzmann transport has been in use for half a century[@Rowe; @Ashcroft]. In this theory, in addition to charge transport $J_{c}$, the heat transport $Q$ \[W/m$^2$\] is also taken into account. In a thermoelectric model, we use the variables $\vec u = (V,T)$ and the currents $\vec J = \left(J_{c},Q\right)$. The transport is then determined by the conductance matrix:
$$\label{eq2:Thermoelectricmatrix}
\bar c = \left(\begin{array}{cc} \sigma & \sigma S \\ \sigma \Pi & k\end{array}\right)$$
where $k$ is the thermal conductivity, $S$ the Seebeck coefficient and $\Pi$ the Peltier coefficient. The Peltier coefficient is related to the Seebeck coefficient by the thermodynamic Thomson-Kelvin relation $\Pi = S T$, where T is the reference temperature. The Seebeck coefficient governs the Seebeck effect: the generation of a voltage as a result of a temperature gradient. The Peltier coefficient describes the transport of energy when a charge current is sent through a material.
In the model, the charge current remains conserved. However, the heat current is not. When a charge current is sent through a material, the inelastic scattering of electrons causes a rise in temperature. This is a process known as Joule heating. Conservation of the currents gives the source term: $\vec f = (0,\vec J_{c}^{2}/\sigma)$.
Unlike electrical transport, which is only carried by (missing) electrons, thermal conductivity typically has two contributions: that from the energy transported by electrons and from lattice vibrations: phonons. In metals, the transport by electrons often dominates. In this case, the Wiedemann-Franz law $k=\sigma L T$, which relates thermal and electrical conductivity through the Lorenz number $L$, can be used to estimate thermal conductivities from measured electrical conductivities.
This model has recently been demonstrated in nanoscale spintronic devices[@Bakker; @Slachter2]. These experiments illustrate that the ferromagnetic/non-magnetic junction used acts as a thermocouple to measure the local temperature of the device. In addition, when a charge current is sent through such a junction it heats or refrigerates the device due to the Peltier effect. In the non-local spin valve geometry, the interplay between both effects leads to a baseline resistance $R_{1}$ which is purely thermoelectric in nature.
The inclusion of Joule heating makes heat transport, and therefore also charge transport, nonlinear. This results in nonlinear voltage signals. While the linear response R$_{1}$ is often resulting from conventional Ohmic paths[@Johnson2], the higher harmonic response are the result of thermoelectric effects. For example, the $R_{2}$ response can result from Joule heating of devices measured by a ferromagnet/non-magnetic thermocouple. If the typical bulk thermal dependencies $\gamma,\alpha$ of the Seebeck coefficient S(T)=$S_{0}(1+\gamma\Delta T)$ and conductivity $\sigma(T)=\sigma_{0}/(1+\alpha\Delta T)$ are used in the model, it is possible to explain even higher order nonlinearities observed in experiment[@Bakker].
Spin-Orbit Effects
------------------
Whenever magnetic fields are applied or magnetism is involved in experiments, a large variety of spin-orbit effects may occur. These effects break the symmetry of the thermoelectric model. The most notable of these is the Hall effect which describes the generation of a voltage perpendicular to the plane made by an applied charge current and magnetic field. The observed transverse voltages generated in a ferromagnet are typically larger than expected from the ordinary Hall effect resulting from internal magnetic fields. Therefore, in ferromagnets, it is named the anomalous-Hall effect. The exact origin of this effect has been under continuous debate for over a century and seems to depend on the specific conditions of the experiment[@Nagaosa].
The equation which describes the anomalous-Hall effect is obtained from Boltzmann transport theory[@Ashcroft] $\nabla V^{AH}=-\theta_{AH} \vec m\times J_{c}$ where $J_{AH}$ is the contribution to the current due to the anomalous-Hall effect. It is incorporated in the model using a skew symmetric conductivity:
$$\label{eq2:AnHall}
\sigma(ij)=\sigma\left(\delta_{ij}-\theta_{AH}\sum_{k} \varepsilon_{ijk} m_{k} \right)$$
Where $\theta_{AH}$ is the anomalous-Hall angle. Such contributions are often called spurious in spintronic devices since they can mimic spin valve signals[@Jedema]. However they can be modeled in spintronic devices to calculate their magnitude.
The Seebeck, Peltier and thermal conductivity coefficients have similar spin-orbit contributions. The effects which arise due to these contributions are named thermomagnetic effects. The effect arising from the Seebeck coefficient is named the anomalous-Nernst effect[^1] and describes the generation of a voltage perpendicular to the plane made by an applied heat current and magnetization. The contribution to the Peltier effect is named the anomalous-Ettinghausen effect[^2] while the contribution to the thermal conductivity is named the anomalous Righi-Leduc effect[^3].
In addition, spin-orbit effects also determine that the conductivity of a ferromagnet is different by measuring it parallel or perpendicular to the magnetization of the ferromagnet. This is the anisotropic magnetoresistance effect and can be included in the model by adding an anisotropic contribution to the conductivity. The symmetric contribution then becomes[@Slachter2]:
$$\label{eq2:AMR}
\sigma(ij)=\sigma_{\perp}\left(\delta_{ij}-R_{AMR} m_{i} m_{j} \right)$$
Where $\delta_{ij}$ is the Kronecker delta and R$_{AMR}$ the coefficient governing anisotropic magnetoresistance, typically a few percent[@Costachespinpump]. By symmetry, we expect equivalent anisotropic contributions to the Seebeck, Peltier and thermal conductivity. However, specific measurements demonstrating these effects have not been reported to the authors knowledge.
We recently measured two of the previously discussed effects in a spin-caloritronic device[@Slachter2]. This device is best described as the thermal equivalent of a spin-valve structure (the magnetic heat valve) and will be discussed in more detail afterwards. Here, one of the ferromagnets was Joule heated to generate a heat current $Q$ through the spin-valve device. The temperature was measured on the second magnet using a thermocouple. Anisotropic magnetoresistive heating and anomalous-Nernst were found to dominate the measured voltage behavior. By virtue of a finite-element model, it was possible to determine magnetization angles and also the size of the anomalous-Nernst effect.
Thermoelectricity and Spin
==========================
Thermoelectricity extends charge transport theory and includes effects governed by the Seebeck, Peltier and thermal conductivity coefficients. The spin-transport model extends charge transport theory to include the spin-dependency of the conductivity and introduces the concept of spin-dependent voltages V$_{\uparrow,\downarrow}$. The model which extends charge transport theory to include both thermoelectricity and spin-transport is named the thermoelectric-spin model. It has been used for almost 50 years to describe thermoelectricity in ferromagnets[@Barnard] and more recently, to describe thermoelectricity of multilayered spin valves[@Gravier1; @Gravier2; @Hatami] and spin transport in ferromagnets[@Saitoh; @Uchida2; @Jaworski].
The relevant physics and measurable voltages in devices can be calculated using finite-element modeling. The spin dependent voltages and temperature are the variables $\vec u$ = $\left(V_{\uparrow},V_{\downarrow},T\right)$ and the fluxes are determined by the spin-dependent charge currents and heat current $\vec J$ = $\left(J_{\uparrow},J_{\downarrow},Q\right)$. The conductance matrix now allows us to include spin-dependent Seebeck S$_{\uparrow,\downarrow}$ and Peltier coefficients $\Pi_{\uparrow,\downarrow}$ to describe not only the coupling between charge and heat transport, but also the coupling between spin and heat transport. The conductance matrix is given by:
$$\label{eq2:condmatspinTE}
\bar c = \left(\begin{array}{ccc} \sigma_{\uparrow} & 0 & \sigma_{\uparrow}S_{\uparrow} \\ 0 & \sigma_{\downarrow} & \sigma_{\downarrow}S_{\downarrow} \\ \sigma_{\uparrow}\Pi_{\uparrow} & \sigma_{\downarrow}\Pi_{\downarrow} & k \end{array}\right)$$
The conservation of charge currents remains unchanged. However, the Valet-Fert equation is altered because in the derivation thermoelectricity is disregarded. It is originally derived using particle conservation[@jedemathesis]:
$$\label{eq2:particlecons}
\frac{1}{e}\nabla \cdot J_{\uparrow,\downarrow} = \mp \frac{n_{\uparrow}}{\tau_{\uparrow\downarrow}} \pm \frac{n_{\downarrow}}{\tau_{\downarrow\uparrow}}$$
Here $\tau_{\uparrow\downarrow}$ represents the time for a spin up electron to flip its spin to spin down while $\tau_{\downarrow\uparrow}$ represents the time from a spin down electron to flip its spin to spin up. The excess electron densities are given by the Einstein relation $n_{\uparrow\downarrow}=N_{\uparrow\downarrow} e V_{\uparrow\downarrow}$, with $N_{\uparrow\downarrow}$ the spin dependent densities of states at the Fermi energy. In the thermoelectric-spin model, the spin-dependent charge currents $J_{\uparrow,\downarrow} = -\sigma_{\uparrow,\downarrow} \left(\nabla V + S_{\uparrow,\downarrow}\nabla T\right)$ additionally includes a temperature gradient as well as the spin-dependent Seebeck coefficients.
The Seebeck coefficient describes how the conductivity depends on energy and is described by the Mott formula. By virtue of the Einstein relation, the Seebeck coefficient is determined by the energy derivative of the density of states $\left(\frac{dN}{dE}\right)_{E_{F}}$ and the relaxation time $\left(\frac{d\tau}{dE}\right)_{E_{F}}$ at the Fermi energy. To develop an altered Valet-Fert equation, the energy dependence of the densities of states N$_{\uparrow,\downarrow}$ and relaxation times $\tau_{\uparrow\downarrow,\downarrow\uparrow}$ needs to be taken into account at the right side of Eq. \[eq2:particlecons\]. While theoretically these contributions can be taken into account, in practice not much is known about these specific energy dependencies. For simplicity, we ignore such terms in the modeling and note that they can be responsible for small bulk source terms[@Saitoh; @Slachter]. Conservation of charge, spin and heat currents are now taken directly from the individual thermoelectric and spin-transport models and produce the following source term:
$$\label{eq2:TEspinsource}
\vec f = \left(\begin{array}{c} \frac{(1-P_{I}^{2})\sigma}{4\lambda^{2}}(V_{\uparrow}-V_{\downarrow})\\ -\frac{(1-P_{I}^{2})\sigma}{4\lambda^{2}}(V_{\uparrow}-V_{\downarrow}) \\ J_{\uparrow}^{2}/\sigma_{\uparrow} + J_{\downarrow}^{2}/\sigma_{\downarrow} \end{array}\right)$$
Where we introduced the individual Joule heating of both spin channels $J_{\uparrow,\downarrow}^{2}/\sigma_{\uparrow,\downarrow}$.
In the spin-dependent charge transport model, the ferromagnetic/non-magnetic interface plays a crucial role in converting spin transport into charge transport and vice versa. Using this coupling between spin and charge, magnetic memory elements can be constructed. In the thermoelectric-spin model, the ferromagnetic/non-magnetic interface plays a similar role. In the following we will show that this interface can be used to convert heat transport into spin transport and also vice versa. The conversion of a heat current into a spin voltage depends solely on the spin-dependency of the Seebeck coefficient and is therefore named the spin-dependent Seebeck effect or by its more application oriented name: thermal spin injection. This was recently measured in a dedicated spin-caloritronic device[@Slachter].
Here, we also propose a measurement scheme for the reciprocal effect. We show that when a spin current is injected into a ferromagnet a net heat flow develops, even in the absence of a charge current. This effect, named the spin-Peltier effect, depends solely on the spin-dependency of the Peltier coefficient.
Spin-dependent Seebeck effect
-----------------------------
The spin-dependent current model dictates that when a charge current $J_{c}=J_{\uparrow}+J_{\downarrow}$ is sent through the bulk of a ferromagnet, a spin current $J_{s}=J_{\uparrow}-J_{\downarrow}$ accompanies it of which the size is determined by the conductivity polarization $J_{s}=P_{I} J_{c}$.
![\[fig2:3\] (Color online) Thermal spin injection, measurement scheme and measured result[@Slachter]. a) A heat current sent through a F/N interface generates a spin voltage $V_{s}\approx\lambda_{F}S_{s}\nabla T$ at the interface which extends a distance $\lambda_{N}$, $\lambda_{F}$ in the materials. b) Thermal spin injection can be measured by Joule heating FM$_{1}$ in a lateral spin valve. This generates a heat current $Q$ over the FM$_{1}$/NM interface which injects spins. The spin voltage is turned into a measurable voltage by the FM$_{2}$/NM interface. The size of thermal spin injection can be determined by selectively switching the magnetizations. c) Measurement result. A signal due to thermal spin injection is present on a large background caused by the measurement of Joule heating by the FM$_{2}$/NM thermocouple. In addition, small traces of anisotropic magnetoresistive heating effects as well as anomalous-Nernst effects are present. These can be seen by the small dip at the switching field of FM$_{1}$ and the offset in background voltage between large positive and negative magnetic fields (see also fig. 7).](fig3.pdf){width="8.8cm"}
In similar fashion, the thermoelectric-spin model dictates that when a heat current $Q$ is sent through the bulk of a ferromagnet in the absence of a charge current, a spin current $J_{s}=-\sigma_{F}(1-P^{2})S_{s}\nabla T/2$ flows, of which the size is determined by the spin-dependent Seebeck coefficient $S_{s} = S_{\uparrow}-S_{\downarrow} = P_{s}S$. Here $P_{s}$ is a fraction of the regular Seebeck coefficient $S$, defined in terms of the spin-dependent Seebeck coefficients as:
$$\label{eq2:seebeckcoeff}
S=\frac{\sigma_{\uparrow}S_{\uparrow}+\sigma_{\downarrow}S_{\downarrow}}{\sigma_{\uparrow}+\sigma_{\downarrow}}$$
In a non-magnetic material, both the conductivity polarization and the spin-dependent Seebeck coefficient are zero. When a charge current is sent through a ferromagnetic/non-magnetic interface, the discontinuity in bulk spin current creates a spin voltage at the interface and injects a net spin current in the non-magnetic material. The same situation occurs when a heat current in the absence of a charge current is sent through the interface.
This effect, the injection of spins in a non-magnetic material by a heat current, is named thermal spin injection or, equivalently, the spin-dependent Seebeck effect[@Slachter]. Since both electrical and thermal spin injection arise from the discontinuity of the bulk spin currents, both effects have similar behavior. For example, the spin voltage spreads an equal distance away from the interface and both effects suffer from the conductivity mismatch problem[@Schmidt] which strongly reduces spin injection in low conductivity materials such as semiconductors.
Thermal spin injection was recently demonstrated in a multiterminal lateral device[@Slachter]. In this device, a temperature gradient is applied to a F/N/F spin valve by Joule heating one of the ferromagnets with the help of a large charge current. The thermoelectrically generated spin voltage across the first ferromagnetic/non-magnetic interface is measured by a second ferromagnetic/non-magnetic interface which converts the spin voltage into a measurable voltage. A schematic picture of thermal spin injection and the used measurement scheme is shown in Fig. \[fig2:3\].
Because Joule heating scales quadratically with the applied charge current $I^{2}$, thermal spin injection results in a nonlinear spin dependent signal $R_{2}^{s} = R_{2}^{P}- R_{2}^{AP}$ where $R_{2}^{P}$ and $R_{2}^{AP}$ are the parallel and antiparallel contributions. The measured result is shown in Fig. \[fig2:3\]c. The applied temperature gradient was very limited due to the relatively large lateral size and because electromigration prohibits heating in excess of 40K in this particular case.
In addition to thermal spin injection, we observe small traces of spin-orbit effects such as the anomalous-Nernst effect in the second ferromagnet and anisotropic magnetoresistive heating of the first ferromagnet. These effects have been more thoroughly examined in another device[@Slachter2]. These effects express themselves by a difference in background voltage for both parallel orientations and the observed small curve in voltage prior to the low field switch.
An application of spin currents lies in its ability to switch the (uniform) magnetization of a ferromagnet around its easy axis by means of spin-transfer torque[@Chappert]. This effect has a threshold in the spin current which needs to be injected in a small volume ferromagnet. Since electrical and thermal spin injection have the same physical origin, the discontinuity in bulk spin current, we may directly compare the critical temperature gradient in the ferromagnet needed to switch a F/N/F spin valve by spin transfer torque to the critical charge current density for this switching process. If the critical charge current density is known, we can calculate the critical temperature gradient which is needed for the switching process:
$$\label{eq2:thermalspininjectiontreshhold}
\nabla T|_{crit} = \frac{2P_{I}}{\sigma P_{s}S (1-P_{I})} J_{crit}$$
Here $J_{crit}$ is the threshold in charge current at which spin transfer torque switching takes place, $\sigma$ the ferromagnetic conductivity and $\nabla T|_{crit}$ the critical temperature gradient in the bulk ferromagnet. As an example, if we assume a critical charge current density J$_{crit} = 10^{11}$ A/m$^{2}$ for a permalloy ferromagnet, with the common (estimated) parameters P$_{I}=0.6$, P$_{s}=0.6$, $\sigma=4\cdot10^{6}$ S/m and $S=-20\mu V$ we find a critical temperature gradient of $\nabla T = 4\cdot10^{9}$ K/m. A typical F/N/F stack of 25 nm then switches at an applied temperature difference of 100 degrees. This process is known as thermal spin transfer torque, and recently evidence has been found for it[@Yu].
![\[fig2:4\] (Color online) Schematic representation of the Spin-Peltier effect. A spin current $J_{s}=J_{\uparrow}-J_{\downarrow}$ free of charge current ($J_{\uparrow}+J_{\downarrow}=0$) is injected from the non-magnetic side of the F/N junction into a ferromagnet $FM$. The top shows the resulting spin-dependent voltages, calculated using the 2-channel model. Despite the fact that no charge current is flowing through the junction, a net heat flow $Q_{\Pi}^{s}=\frac{1}{2}(\Pi_{\uparrow}-\Pi_{\downarrow}) J_{s}$ develops in the ferromagnet which quickly drops off due to the spin relaxation length $\lambda_{F}$. Depending on the sign of the spin current and the parallel/antiparallel alignment of the magnetization, net heat is transported from the non-magnetic material to the ferromagnet or vice versa. This creates a temperature difference $\Delta T$ between the bulk non-magnetic material and the bulk ferromagnet.](fig4.pdf){width="8.8cm"}
The ability to use finite element modeling should allow to engineer multiterminal F/N/F pillar devices which switch by thermal spin transfer torque. Such devices can combine the high polarization properties of pillar devices with the flexibility of lateral devices. By selectively heating the device, the effect can also be used to lower the effective threshold in electrical spin injection.
Spin-Peltier effect
-------------------
The Onsager reciprocity relation dictates that when heat transport induces spin transport free of charge currents in a ferromagnet, the opposite can also occur. A pure spin current injected in a ferromagnet should induce net heat transport. This reciprocal effect is named the spin-Peltier effect.
![\[fig2:5\] (Color online) Proposed non-local measurement scheme for the spin-Peltier effect. a) The non-local spin valve geometry allows to inject a pure spin current into ferromagnet $FM_{2}$ by sending a charge current $J_{c}$ across the $FM_{1}/NM$ interface. This spin current creates a temperature difference across the $FM_{2}/NM$ interface changing the local temperature $T_{F}$ of the ferromagnet. The effect is detected by converting the temperature to a voltage $V_{TC}=\Delta S_{FM} T_{F}$ using a thermocouple. Here $\Delta S_{FM}$ is the difference between Seebeck coefficients between the ferromagnet and the non-magnetic material (yellow). The thermocouple measures the temperature $T_{F}$ of the ferromagnet and optionally, makes use of the large Seebeck coefficient of the ferromagnet itself. b) The simulated spin-Peltier signal. The resulting signal should have a background determined by Peltier cooling/heating at the $FM_{1}/NM$ interface and subsequent consequence to the temperature $T_{F}$. A small signal of $~100$ nV due to the spin-Peltier effect should arise which only depends on the parallel or antiparallel alignment of both magnetizations.](fig5.pdf){width="8.8cm"}
We illustrate this effect in Fig. \[fig2:4\] by considering the F/N interface previously used. A pure spin current is injected from the non-magnetic side into the ferromagnet. When the spin current enters the ferromagnet it reduces in size at the spin relaxation length, for metals ranging from a few to tens of nanometers. The spin-dependent voltages which result from the spin current are sketched in the top part of Fig. \[fig2:4\]. In the absence of charge currents, the heat current in the system due to the spin-Peltier effect $Q_{\Pi}$ can be deduced from the thermoelectric-spin model:
$$\label{eq2:heattransportspinpeltier}
Q_{\Pi}=\frac{1}{2}(\Pi_{\uparrow}-\Pi_{\downarrow}) J_{s}$$
In the non-magnetic material, $\Pi_{\uparrow}=\Pi_{\downarrow}$ and no net heat transport due to the spin-Peltier effect takes place. In the ferromagnet, the spin-Peltier coefficient, defined as $\Pi_{s}=\Pi_{\uparrow}-\Pi_{\downarrow}$ can be non-zero. Close to the interface, the spin current $\vec J_{s}$ is also non-zero. This induces heat transport due to the spin-Peltier effect which drops off in the ferromagnet at the spin relaxation length. As a result, a temperature difference $\Delta T$ develops between the bulk non-magnetic material and the ferromagnet.
The Thomson-Kelvin relation $\Pi=S T$ relates the conventional Seebeck and Peltier coefficients. This also holds for the individual spin species. From the recently found spin-dependent Seebeck coefficient $S_{s}$ we can calculate the spin-Peltier coefficient $\Pi_{s}=S_{s} T$ which can be used to estimate the effect.
We calculate the exact temperature difference by considering the total heat current $Q=\Pi_{s} J_{s}-k \nabla T$ in the ferromagnetic and non-magnetic regions. Like spin and charge currents, the heat current is continuous across the interface. If we ignore Joule heating due to spin currents, it is also continuous in the bulk of the non-magnetic and ferromagnetic parts and equal to $k_{i} \nabla T|_{i}$. Here the index $i$ denotes the region. The presence of the spin-Peltier effect induces an additional temperature gradient $\nabla T|_{\Pi} (x) = \frac{\Pi_{s}}{2 k_{F}}J_{s}(x)$ in the small ferromagnet region in which a sizeable spin current exists. The spin current drops off exponentially from the interface: $J_{s}(x)=J_{s}^{0} e^{-x/\lambda_{F}}$. Here $J_{s}^{0}$ is the spin current at the interface. If we integrate this additional temperature gradient over this region, we find the temperature difference between the bulk ferromagnet and non-magnetic material:
$$\label{eq2:TempdiffSP}
\Delta T |_{F-N} = \frac{\Pi_{s}}{2 k_{F}} \lambda_{F} J_{s}^{0}$$
This temperature difference depends solely on the spin-Peltier coefficient $\Pi_{s}$, the spin relaxation length $\lambda_{F}$ and the thermal conductivity $k_{F}$ of the ferromagnet. Its sign is determined by the sign of spin current and the spin-Peltier coefficient.
The non-local spin valve geometry is an ideal geometry to inject pure spin currents into a ferromagnet. The generated temperature difference over the interface can be detected by measuring the temperature of the ferromagnet in which the pure spin current is injected. This can be achieved by placing a thermocouple on the ferromagnet. This measurement geometry is illustrated in Fig. \[fig2:5\]. The background voltage is then solely determined by the Peltier heating of the $FM_{1}/NM$ interface which injects the spin current and the subsequent measurement of the temperature by the thermocouple. The spin-Peltier signal then appears as a regular resistance $R_{1}$ which solely depends on the parallel or antiparallel alignment of both magnetizations.
For permalloy, all parameters are known[@Slachter] and we can estimate the temperature difference which can be created in this manner. At a realistic maximum pure spin current which can be injected into a permalloy ferromagnet in the non-local spin valve geometry (see the previous discussion below Fig. \[fig2:1\]) we have $J_{s}^{0} = 10^{11}$ A/m$^{2}$. Using this value, we find a temperature difference of $\Delta T$ = 20 mK between the parallel and antiparallel orientation of the permalloy spin valve across the interface of the ferromagnet. A typical thermocouple which can be realized on a (lateral) ferromagnet[@Slachter2] has an efficiency of $\Delta S = 40 \mu V /K$. This results in a maximal spin-Peltier signal of 800 nV which is small but observable. Initial experiments show signs of the spin-Peltier effect, however, it is hard to distinguish it from small parasitic effects, for example, the pick-up of regular non-local spin valve signals by an uneven distribution of the spin-voltage at the detecting interface.
Beyond Thermoelectricity and spin: The spin-dependent heat model
================================================================
In the thermoelectric-spin model a single electron temperature was introduced which holds for both spin species. The energy of the electrons is distributed in their respective bands according to a position-dependent Fermi-Dirac distribution $f_{\uparrow,\downarrow}(\epsilon,n_{\uparrow},T)$ with a spin-specific local density $n_{\uparrow,\downarrow}$ and local temperature $T$. This model assumes strong inelastic interaction within each spin species and also between them to obtain the required thermodynamic distribution. It is caused by electron-electron interaction or mediated by phonons through electron-phonon interaction.
At low temperatures inelastic scattering becomes weaker and this requirement does not hold. It was shown in the past that inelastic scattering can be weak on the scale of the spin relaxation length in non-magnetic metals[@Baselmans] at sub-4K temperatures where electron transport is still diffusive, limited by elastic scattering. Although in this situation it is hard to speak of electrons which are distributed according to a Fermi-Dirac distribution in their respective bands, it is still possible to describe thermal transport according to a diffusion equation. The temperature $T$ then represents the local average excess energy of electrons compared to the situation at zero Kelvin. In addition, the spin-dependent electron species also do not exchange energy with each other.
This requires the introduction of a spin-dependent heat model where both spin channels have their own heat current $Q_{\uparrow,\downarrow}$, thermal conductivity $k_{\uparrow,\downarrow}$ and spin-dependent temperature $T_{\uparrow,\downarrow}$. This opens up the possibility to demonstrate new thermal and, possibly, thermoelectric experiments in magnetoelectronic devices. Such a model has been first described by Heikkilä *et al.*[@Heikkila]. We introduce a bulk diffusion model and calculate an example device.
The Wiedemann-Franz law describes the relation between charge and thermal conductivity. Both are dominated by electron transport in metals. Therefore, a spin polarization in the electrical conductance $P_{I}$ leads to a spin polarization in thermal conductance $P_{Q}$, similarly defined in terms of spin-dependent heat conductances as $P_{Q} = (k_{\uparrow}-k_{\downarrow}) / (k_{\uparrow}+k_{\downarrow})$. The model for spin-dependent electrical and thermal transport now includes the spin-dependent voltages and temperatures $\vec u = (V_{\uparrow},V_{\downarrow},T_{\uparrow},T_{\downarrow})$. The spin-dependent charge and heat currents $\vec J = (J_{\uparrow},J_{\downarrow},Q_{\uparrow},Q_{\downarrow})$ are determined through the 4x4 conductance matrix:
$$\label{eq2:cmatrixspinheat}
\bar c = \left(\begin{array}{cccc} \sigma_{\uparrow} & 0 & \sigma_{\uparrow}S_{\uparrow} & 0 \\ 0 & \sigma_{\downarrow} & 0 & \sigma_{\downarrow}S_{\downarrow} \\ \sigma_{\uparrow}\Pi_{\uparrow} & 0 & k_{\uparrow} & 0 \\ 0 & \sigma_{\downarrow}\Pi_{\downarrow} & 0 & k_{\downarrow} \end{array}\right)$$
Where the spin-dependent thermoelectric effects, represented by the coefficients $S_{\uparrow,\downarrow}$ and $\Pi_{\uparrow,\downarrow}$, are used in the relevant spin-dependent currents. The conservation of spin and charge currents remains the same, and therefore the components of the source term for the spin-dependent charge currents as well. It is straightforward to include the conservation of the total heat current $Q = Q_{\uparrow} + Q_{\downarrow}$ into its spin-dependent parts: the Joule heating of each channel $J_{\uparrow,\downarrow}^{2}/\sigma_{\uparrow,\downarrow}^{2}$ simply applies to the channels individually. We note here that strictly speaking, if there is no inelastic scattering, there is no Joule heating. However, any weak inelastic scattering does raise the average energy of the electron baths which allows Joule heating to be used in the model as a local source of heat.
Although it is beyond the scope of this article to derive the conservation of spin heat currents $Q_{s} = Q_{\uparrow} - Q_{\downarrow}$ from Boltzmann transport theory[@Tulaparkur2], we may introduce a phenomenological relaxation analogue to the relaxation of the amount of spins themselves, represented by the Valet-Fert equation for spin voltage.
The difference in excess energy between both spin species is represented by the spin temperature $T_{s} = T_{\uparrow} - T_{\downarrow}$. In our model, we assume a thermal equivalent of the Valet-Fert equation $\nabla^{2}T_{s} = \frac{T_{s}}{\lambda_{Q}^{2}}$. Here $\lambda_{Q}$ is the relaxation length for the spin temperature. This relaxation length is not only limited by spin flip processes, but can also be limited due to inelastic scattering between both spin species, where energy is being exchanged between both spin species without flipping its spin. This results in the boundary condition for spin relaxation lengths $\lambda_{Q}\leq\lambda$. The spin relaxation lengths are equal whenever inelastic scattering is absent.
New source terms $\pm\frac{(1-P_{Q}^{2})k}{4\lambda_{Q}^{2}}(T_{\uparrow}-T_{\downarrow})$ are then added such that the conservation of spin heat is also included. This leads to the following source term in this model:
$$\label{eq2:TEspinsource}
\vec f = \left(\begin{array}{c} \frac{(1-P_{I}^{2})\sigma}{4\lambda^{2}}(V_{\uparrow}-V_{\downarrow})\\ -\frac{(1-P_{I}^{2})\sigma}{4\lambda^{2}}(V_{\uparrow}-V_{\downarrow}) \\ \frac{(1-P_{Q}^{2})k}{4\lambda_{Q}^{2}}(T_{\uparrow}-T_{\downarrow}) + J_{\uparrow}^{2}/\sigma_{\uparrow} \\
-\frac{(1-P_{Q}^{2})k}{4\lambda_{Q}^{2}}(T_{\uparrow}-T_{\downarrow}) + J_{\downarrow}^{2}/\sigma_{\downarrow} \end{array}\right)$$
The thermoelectric coefficients in this model typically scale with temperature and are very small at the temperatures where this model is applicable. For example, for many non-magnetic metals the Seebeck coefficient scales linearly with temperature such that typical Seebeck coefficients are in the order of 10 nV/K at Helium temperatures[@Barnard]. This also holds for typical ferromagnets such as Cobalt or permalloy. Therefore, we first explore the special properties of spin-dependent heat conduction itself and propose the thermal equivalent of the spin valve.
Magnetic heat valve
-------------------
If we disregard thermoelectricity as well as charge currents in magnetoelectronic devices, such that Joule heating is absent, spin-dependent charge and heat transport are each represented by an independent set of equations. The mathematical model introduced to describe spin-dependent heat transport is then identical to that which describes spin-dependent charge transport. The difference between the models is the size of the coefficients. The equivalence of the coefficients used in both models is depicted in Fig. \[fig2:6\]a.
Consequently, concepts which are relevant in the spin-dependent charge transport model will have their equivalent in the spin-dependent heat transport model. A similar resistor model also applies[@Valet]. For example, consider a heat current $Q$ sent through a F/N interface. This creates a difference in temperature between both spin species $T_{s}$ which relaxes in the materials with the spin heat relaxation length $\lambda_{Q}$. This is depicted in Fig. \[fig2:6\]b. The size of the spin temperature at the interface can be directly deduced from the equivalently calculated spin voltage $V_{s}$ in the charge transport model[@vSon]:
$$\label{eq2:heatvalvespintempFN}
\frac{T_{s}}{Q} = \frac{2P_{Q}R_{F,Q}R_{N,Q}}{R_{F,Q}+(1-P_{Q}^{2})R_{N,Q}}$$
Where $R_{N,Q} = \frac{\lambda_{N,Q}}{k_{N}}$ and $R_{F,Q} = \frac{\lambda_{F,Q}}{k_{F}}$ are the equivalent thermal resistances determined by the spin heat relaxation lengths and the thermal conductivities of the materials. A spin related ’thermal resistance’ $\Delta T = \frac{1}{2}P_{Q} T_{s}$ also develops across the interface.
![\[fig2:6\] (Color online) The spin-dependent heat model. a) Equivalency between the coefficients of the spin-dependent heat and charge models when thermoelectricity and Joule heating is disregarded. b) A heat current $Q$ sent through the F-N interface creates a spin-temperature $T_{s}$ and spin-related temperature difference $\Delta T$. c) The F/N/F magnetic heat valve. A heat current sent through a F/N/F spin valve structure creates a temperature difference across it dependent on the parallel or antiparallel alignment of both magnetizations. d) A possible experimental realization of the F/N/F heat valve. By heat sinking one ferromagnet and Joule heating another, heat can be transported through the heat valve. The temperature of the second ferromagnet depends on the specific thermal resistance of the heat valve, determined through the parallel or antiparallel alignment of the magnetizations, and can be measured using a thermocouple.](fig6.pdf){width="8.8cm"}
There also exists a thermal equivalent of the electrical F/N/F spin valve. When a heat current $Q$ is sent through a F/N/F spin valve, a temperature difference $\Delta T$ develops across it, which depends on the parallel or antiparallel alignment of the magnetizations. We refer to this concept as the magnetic heat valve. It is depicted in Fig. \[fig2:6\]c. In the electrical spin valve, a simple calculation[@Jedema] gives the difference between parallel and antiparallel resistance per unit area $R_{P}-R_{AP}= 2 P_{I}^{2} R_{F} R_{N}/ (R_{F}+R_{N}(1-P_{I}^{2}))$ whenever the distance $L$ between both ferromagnets is $L \ll \lambda_{N}$. Whenever $L \ll \lambda_{N,Q}$ we obtain the temperature difference between the parallel and antiparallel alignment in the magnetic heat valve:
$$\label{eq2:heatvalveFN}
\frac{\Delta T_{P}-\Delta T_{AP}}{Q} = \frac{2 P_{Q}^{2} R_{F,Q} R_{N,Q}}{R_{F,Q} + R_{N,Q}(1-P_{Q}^{2})}$$
As an example, let us consider a Py/Cu/Py heat valve in a 25 nm thick pillar stack where the non-magnetic metal is thin enough to satisfy the condition $L \ll \lambda_{N,Q}$. Whenever the spin valve is held at a total temperature where inelastic scattering is small but not negligible, say $\lambda_{Q}\approx \lambda/2$ and assume the estimated values $P_{Q} = 0.6, \lambda_{F} = 5$ nm, $\lambda_{N} = 1 \mu$m, $k_{Cu}$ = 300 W/m/K, $k_{Py}$ = 30 W/m/K an applied temperature gradient of 10K / 25 nm produces a significant temperature difference of $\approx$2K across the spin valve depending on the parallel or antiparallel alignment.
In a spin valve, it is possible to use Joule or laser heating to produce heat currents through a device[@Gravier1]. However, measuring a temperature difference across a device is non-trivial. Nevertheless, by measuring the absolute temperature at the second ferromagnet with the aid of a thermocouple, the process can be measured since the process does influence the net heat flow through the device. This experimental measurement technique is sketched in Fig. \[fig2:6\]d. It is fairly non-trivial to use analytical solutions, as heat transport through a substrate and Joule heating itself are hard to calculate in a three dimensional geometry. However, by fitting the obtained measured voltages to those resulting from a finite-element model with varying geometry, it should be possible to extract useful coefficients, such as spin heat relaxation lengths at different temperatures.
![\[fig2:7\] (Color online) Modeling of a fabricated device[@Slachter2] which potentially could show the magnetic heat valve effect. a) SEM figure and measurement geometry. Two permalloy ferromagnets (blue) are connected by a copper rectangle (brown). The temperature T$_{F}$ of the second ferromagnet is measured by a NiCr (contact 4,6) - Py thermocouple. b) Measurement at a typical current of 1 mA. No regular spin valve signal is present, which would be the result of the magnetic heat valve effect. The anomalous-Nernst (1) and anisotropic magnetoresistive heating (2) effects are present. c) Calculated spin temperature at I$_{1-2}$ = 1 mA zoomed at the copper rectangle calculated using the parameters $\lambda_{Py,Q}$ = 5nm, $\lambda_{Cu,Q}$ = 350 nm and P$_{Q}$ = 0.25.](fig7.pdf){width="8.8cm"}
This experimental measurement technique has been used previously at room temperature[@Slachter2]. Here, a Py/Cu/Py spin valve was used and a Py/NiCr thermocouple. A SEM picture of the device is shown with a typical measurement in Fig. \[fig2:7\]. The system was modeled with a regular thermoelectric model which showed that a maximum heat current of $Q\approx10^{9}$ W/m$^{2}$ can be achieved at which the temperature difference across the spin valve is $\approx$2K with a used charge current of $I_{c}$ = 2 mA.
Although at room temperature, regular spin-orbit effects such as the anomalous-Nernst (1) and anisotropic magnetoresistance (2) are dominant, we can use this sample to demonstrate a calculation of the spin-dependent heat model. Using the additional parameters shown in Fig. \[fig2:7\], and assuming no inelastic scattering ($\lambda_{Q} = \lambda$) and $P_{Q}=P_{I}$, we calculate a temperature difference $\Delta T_{P}-\Delta T_{AP}$ = 8 mK due to the heat valve effect which leads to a response R$_{2}^{s}$ = 19.6 nV/mA$^{2}$ when the thermocouple is measured. The temperature difference is 10 times lower than the value calculated from Eq. \[eq2:heatvalveFN\] with $\nabla T|_{F}\approx3\cdot10^{7}$ K/m and is due to spin relaxation in the non-magnetic material. With a noise level of $\approx$5 nV/mA$^{2}$ the heat valve effect should be observable if inelastic scattering between both spin species is absent. The absence of a spin heat signal above the noise level shows that inelastic scattering is strong enough such that we find the requirement $\lambda_{Q} < \frac{1}{2}\lambda$ valid at room temperature. When $\lambda_{Q} = \frac{1}{2}\lambda$ the calculated signal is approximately identical to the noise level.
Thermoelectricity and spin-dependent heat
-----------------------------------------
The spin-dependent heat model becomes relevant when inelastic interaction between the spin species is weak, which occurs at low temperatures. Thermoelectric effects are small at these temperatures, which is why thus far we did not consider the connection between the spin-dependent thermoelectric effects and the effects due to spin-dependent heat.
However, prospects in fabrication which connects the flexibility of a multiterminal lateral device design with the high signals observed in pillar structures and the low noise experiments associated with a low operating temperature should increase the observability of the effects so far considered. We may then also consider the higher order effects related to this connection.
Whenever a charge current $J_{c}$ is sent through a ferromagnet a spin heat current $Q_{s} = \Pi_{s} J_{c}$ also flows, determined by the spin-Peltier coefficient $\Pi_{s}$. Here we assumed $V_{\uparrow}=V_{\downarrow}$. Similar to the case of electrical spin injection and thermal spin injection, when this charge current is sent through a F/N interface, this creates a spin temperature $T_{s}^{0}$ at the interface which relaxes in the respective materials at the respective spin heat relaxation lengths $\lambda_{Q}$. We propose to name this effect the thermal spin-Peltier effect. The size of the effect is given by Eq. \[eq2:heatvalvespintempFN\] with the source of the spin heat current in the bulk $Q_{s} = P_{Q}Q$ substituted by that due to this effect $Q_{s} = \Pi_{s} J_{c}$. We note that this ignores the generation of a spin voltage at the interface which by ordinary thermoelectric effects is converted to a spin temperature.
Although at low temperatures $\Pi_{s}$ can be very small, the maximum charge current, for small devices typically limited by electromigration ($J_{c}^{max}$ = 10$^{12}$ A/m$^{2}$), is often larger than the typical heat current, which might render this effect more efficient to generate a spin temperature in a non-magnetic material than the previously described effect in the magnetic heat valve[^4].
The Onsager reciprocal effect can also occur in this model. Whenever a spin heat current $Q_{s}$ is injected into a ferromagnet at a F/N interface this creates a voltage difference $\Delta V |_{F-N}$ between the bulk non-magnetic material and ferromagnet. We propose to name this the thermal spin-dependent Seebeck effect. The calculation of this voltage goes similar to the calculation of the temperature difference $\Delta T$ in the spin-Peltier effect. Checking the symmetry between the spin-dependent charge and heat models we can directly substitute the various coefficients in Eq. \[eq2:TempdiffSP\] to obtain the induced voltage difference over the interface:
$$\label{eq2:VoltdiffSP2}
\Delta V |_{F-N} = \frac{S_{s}}{2 k_{F}} \lambda_{F,Q} Q_{s}^{0}$$
It is possible to measure this voltage difference directly over an interface in a multiterminal non-local device. However, it requires a source of pure spin heat current $Q_{s}$ in which preferably a charge-related spin current $J_{s}$ is absent. This is a situation difficult to achieve. However, if both sources of $Q_{s}$ and $J_{s}$ scale differently with applied charge current it is perhaps possible to distinguish between the generation of a voltage over a F/N interface due to charge-releated spin currents and those due to spin heat currents in a suitably designed experiment.
Discussion
==========
Throughout this article we have considered transparent (Ohmic) interfaces and collinear magnetic systems. In this case, the spin-dependent charge and heat currents are continuous across the interfaces and are scalar quantities. Past experiments show that whenever oxide layers are formed at interfaces the spin-dependent effects can be greatly enhanced[@Parkin]. Furthermore, a non-collinear system is required to describe important applications of spin-dependent transport such as the spin-torque-oscillator[@Tsoi; @Kiselev; @Krivorotov; @Kaka; @Houssameddine] or spin-transfer-torque magnetic memory[@Chappert; @Albert; @Yang]. In these cases the diffusion theory developed here is not sufficient to describe the relevant processes. Instead, it should be described by a more general theory which includes spin-dependent tunneling and a 3-dimensional spin vector, for example the magnetoelectronic circuit theory[@BrataasNCME; @Tserkovnyakrevmodphys]. Heikkilä, Hatami and coworkers have previously developed such a theory[@Heikkila; @Hatami] in explaining thermal spin-transfer torque and spin-dependent heat.
In such a theory, the transport of electrons across interfaces is described by a 4x4 conductance matrix $\bar G$, which relates the total flux $\bar J=(J_{c},\vec J_{s},Q,\vec Q_{s})$ at the interface to the variables at both sides $\bar u^{i}=(V_{c}^{i},\vec V_{s}^{i},T^{i},\vec T_{s}^{i})$ (i=F,N) by $\bar J = \bar G (\bar u^{F} - \bar u^{N})$.
Initial calculations on the conductance matrix for F/N interfaces have been carried out by Hatami and coworkers[@Hatami] who in this framework calculated thermal spin-transfer-torque for various ferromagnet/non-magnetic interfaces.
In the extended magnetoelectronic circuit theory they have introduced, all spin-dependent physics such as electrical or thermal spin injection is fully determined by the elements of the conductance matrix instead of the previously defined bulk spin-polarized parameters $P_{I}, P_{S}, P_{\Pi}, P_{Q}$ of the ferromagnet. The physical origin in both theories is principally different; diffusion theory relates spin-dependent effects occurring at the interface to bulk ferromagnetic parameters (which in itself is only relevant very close to the interface) and the magnetoelectronic circuit theory describes the physics to occur due to quantum mechanical tunneling of spin states. However, the effects they describe are the same. For example, thermal spin injection still describes the injection of spins in a non-magnetic metal due a heat flow over a ferromagnetic/non-magnetic interface. Dependent on the application, either the more simple diffusive theory developed here can be used or one needs to refer to the full circuit theory.
Summary
=======
We have developed a diffusive theory for spin-dependent charge and heat conduction which includes spin-orbit effects. Finite-element methods were used to model several experiments from literature where several parameters of this model were quantified. Electrical spin injection, the spin-Hall angle of platinum and thermal spin injection were calculated. Also, new experiments were proposed which should demonstrate the spin-Peltier effect and a lower limit was given in an experiment which failed to demonstrate the magnetic heat valve.
Acknowledgement
===============
We would like to acknowledge J.G. Holstein, B. Wolfs and S. Bakker for technical assistance and F.K. Dejene for critically reading the manuscript. This work was financed by the European EC Contract IST-033749 ’DynaMax’ and the ’Stichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie’ (FOM).
[50]{}
I. Zutic, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Rev. Mod. Phys. **76**, 323 (2004)
J. Slonczewski, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. **159**, L1 (1996)
A. Brataas, Y. Tserkovnyak, G.E.W. Bauer, and B.I. Halperin, Phys. Rev. B **66**, 060404 (2002)
J. Hirsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. **83**, 1834 (1999)
S. Kiselev, J. Sankey, I. Krivotorov, N. Emley, R. Schoelkopf, R. Buhrman, and D. Ralph, Nature **425**, 380 (2003)
M.V. Costache, M. Sladkov, S.M. Watts, C.H. van der Wal, and B.J. van Wees, Phys. Rev. Lett. **97**, 216603 (2006)
K. Uchida, S. Takahashi, K. Harii, J. Ieda, W. Koshibae, K. Ando, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Nature **455**, 778 (2008)
S. Valenzuela and M. Tinkham, Science **442**, 176 (2006)
G.E.W. Bauer, A.H. MacDonald, and S. Maekawa, Solid State Commun. **150**, 459 (2010)
T.T. Heikkilä, M. Hatami, and G.E.W. Bauer, Phys. Rev. B **81**, 100408 (2010)
C.M. Jaworski, J. Yang, S. Mack, D.D. Awschalom, J.P. Heremans, and R.C. Myers, Nature Mater. **9**, 898 (2010)
K. Uchida, J. Xiao, H. Adachi, J. Ohe, S. Takahashi, J. Ieda, T. Ota, Y. Kajiwara, H. Umezawa, H. Kawai, G.E.W. Bauer, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Nature Mater. **9**, 894 (2010)
J.-C. Breton, S. Sharma, H. Saito, S. Yuasa, and R. Jansen, Nature **475**, 82 (2011)
A.A. Tulaparkur and Y. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. B **83**, 012401 (2011)
F. Giazotto, T.T. Heikkilä, A. Luukanen, A.M. Savin, and J.P. Pekola, Rev. Mod. Phys. **78**, 217 (2006)
N. Mott and H. Wills, Proc. R. Soc. **153**, 699 (1936)
T. Valet and A. Fert, Phys. Rev. B **48**, 7099 (1993)
A. Brataas, G.E.W. Bauer, and P.J. Kelly, Phys. Rep. **427**, 157 (2006)
Y. Tserkovnyak, A. Brataas, G.E.W. Bauer, and B.I. Halperin, Rev. Mod. Phys. **77**, 1375 (2005)
C. Chappert, A. Fert, and F. Nguyen van Dau, Nature Mater. **6**, 813 (2007)
Y. Tserkovnyak, A. Brataas, and G.E.W. Bauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. **88**, 117601 (2002)
M. Johnson and R.H. Silsbee, Phys. Rev. B **35**, 4959 (1987)
J.-E. Wegrowe, Phys. Rev. B **62**, 1067 (2000)
L. Gravier, S. Serrano-Guisan, F. Reuse, and J.-Ph. Ansermet, Phys. Rev. B **73**, 052410 (2006)
T. Kimura, Y. Otani, T. Sato, S. Takahashi, and S. Maekawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. **98**, 156601 (2007)
A. Slachter, F.L. Bakker, and B.J. van Wees, Phys. Rev. B, in print (2011)
F.L. Bakker, A. Slachter, J.-P. Adam, and B.J. van Wees, Phys. Rev. Lett. **105**, 136601 (2010)
A. Slachter, F.L. Bakker, J.-P. Adam, and B.J. van Wees, Nature Phys. **6**, 879 (2010)
T. Yang, T. Kimura, and Y. Otani, Nature Phys. **4**, 851 (2008)
M. Hatami, G.E.W. Bauer, Q. Zhang, P.J. Kelly, Phys. Rev. Lett. **99**, 066603 (2007)
S. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. **85**, 393 (2000)
T. Kimura, Y. Otani, and J. Hamrle, Phys. Rev. B **73**, 132405 (2006)
F.J. Jedema, A.T. Filip, and B.J. van Wees, Nature **410**, 345 (2001)
F.J. Jedema, H.B. Heersche, A.T. Filip, J.J.A. Baselmans, and B.J. van Wees, Nature **416**, 713 (2002)
D.Y. Petrovykh, K.N. Altmann, H. Höchst, M. Laubscher, S. Maat, G.J. Mankey, F.J. Himpsel, Appl. Phys. Lett. **73**, 3459 (1998)
V. Vlaminck and M. Bailleul, Science **322**, 410 (2008)
T. Kimura, Y. Sato, and Y. Otani, Phys. Rev. Lett. **100**, 066602 (2008)
M. Johnson and R.H. Silsbee, Phys. Rev. Lett. **55**, 1790 (1985)
J.Z. Sun, Phys. Rev. B **65**, 570 (2000)
M.I. D’Yakanov and V.I. Perel, Phys. Lett. **35A**, 459 (1971)
Y.K. Kato, R.S. Myers, A.C. Gossard, and D.D. Awschalom, Science **82**, 1910 (2010)
M. Cutler and N.F. Mott, Phys. Rev. **181**, 1336 (1969)
Barnard, R.D., *Thermoelectricity in Metals and Alloys* (Taylor & Francis Ltd, 1972)
Rowe, D.M., *Thermoelectrics Handbook: Macro to Nano* (Taylor & Francis Group, 2006)
Ashcroft, N.W. and Mermin, N.D., *Solid State Physics* (Brooks Cole, 1976)
M. Johnson and R.H. Silsbee, Phys. Rev. B **76**, 153107 (2007)
N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A.H. MacDonald, and N.P. Ong, Rev. Mod. Phys. **82**, 1539 (2010)
L. Gravier, S. Serrano-Guisan, F. Reuse, and J.-Ph. Ansermet, Phys. Rev. B **73**, 024419 (2006)
F.J. Jedema, Ph.D. thesis, University of Groningen (2002), ISBN 90-367-1724-8
G. Schmidt, D. Ferrand, L.W. Molenkamp, A.T. Filip, and B.J. van Wees, Phys. Rev. B **62**, R4790 (2000)
H. Yu, S. Granville, D.P. Yu, and J.-Ph. Ansermet, Phys. Rev. Lett. **105**, 146601 (2010)
J.J.A. Baselmans, A.F. Morpurgo, B.J. van Wees, and T.M. Klapwijk, Nature **397**, 43 (1999)
P.C. van Son, H. van Kempen, and P. Wyder, Phys. Rev. Lett. **58**, 2271 (1987)
S.S.P. Parkin, C. Kaiser, A. Panchula, P.M. Rice, B. Hughes, M. Samant, and S-H. Yang, Nature Mater. **3**, 862 (2004)
M. Tsoi, A. Jansen, J. Bass, W.-C. Chiang, V. Tsoi, and P. Wyder, Nature **406**, 46 (2000)
I. Krivorotov, N. Emley, J. Sankey, D. Kiselev, D. Ralph, and R. Buhrman, Science **307**, 228 (2005)
S. Kaka, M. Pufall, W. Rippard, T. Silva, S. Russek, and J. Katine, Nature **437**, 389 (2005)
D. Houssameddine, U. Ebels, B. Delaet, B. Rodmacq, I. Firastrau, F. Ponthenier, M. Brunet, C. Thirion, J.-P. Michel, L. Prejbeanu-Buda, M.-C. Cyrille, O. Redon, and B. Dieny, Nature Mater. **6**, 447 (2007)
F. Albert, J. Katine, and R. Buhrman, Appl. Phys. Lett. **77**, 3809 (2000)
[^1]: Equivalently named the transverse Seebeck or Nernst-Ettingshausen I effect.
[^2]: Equivalently named transverse Peltier or Nernst-Ettinghausen II effect.
[^3]: Equivalently named the thermal-Hall effect
[^4]: In practice, it is necessary to separate the creation and detection of a spin temperature in a lateral device in order to prove the effect is due to the spin temperature only. Otherwise, such effects can be mistaken for a spin-current injection related voltage spread over the detector interface. This geometry requires additional contacts which increases the distance between injection and detection and reduces the desired observable effect.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'The Reeb graph of a scalar function defined on a domain gives a topological meaningful summary of that domain. Reeb graphs have been shown in the past decade to be of great importance in geometric processing, image processing, computer graphics and computational topology. The demand to compute large data sets has increased in the last decade and hence the consideration of parallelization of topological computations. We propose a parallel Reeb graph algorithm on triangulated meshes with and without a boundary. Furthermore, we give a description for extracting the original manifold data from the Reeb graph structure. As an application, we show how our algorithm can be utilized in mesh segmentation algorithms.'
address:
- Ohio State University
- University of South Florida
author:
- Mustafa Hajij
- Paul Rosen
bibliography:
- 'refs\_2.bib'
title: An efficient data retrieval parallel Reeb graph Algorithm
---
Introduction
============
Recent years have witnessed an extensive research in topological based method to analyze and study data [@carlsson2009topology; @carlsson2008persistent]. The popularity of topological based techniques seem to be coming from the generality and the robustness of the these techniques and their applicability to a wide range of areas. The *Reeb graph* [@Reeb1946] has been one of the most successful topological tools in the data analysis and data understanding. The Reeb graph is a data structure associated to a scalar function defined on a manifold. It gives an efficient topological summary for the manifold by encoding the evolution of the connectivity of its level sets. Reeb graphs, and their loop-less version, contour trees [@boyell1963hybrid], are of fundamental importance in computational topology, geometric processing, image processing, computer graphics, and more recently, data analysis and visualization. Examples of Reeb graph applications include quadrangulation [@hetroy2003topological], shape understanding [@attene2003shape], surface understanding and data simplification [@biasotti2000extended], parametrization [@patane2004graph; @zhang2005feature], segmentation [@werghi2006functional], animation [@kanongchaiyos2000articulated], feature detection [@takahashi2004topological], data reduction and simplification [@carr2004simplifying; @rosen2017using], image processing [@kweon1994extracting], visualization of isosurfaces [@bajaj1997contour] and many others.
The past decade has witnessed an increase of large geometric data on which a scalar field is defined. This has yielded several challenges for the time efficiency computation of topological structures usually computed on such data. Parallelization of the utilized algorithms is a natural direction one usually takes in order to improve the computational-time efficiency. In this article we introduce an efficient shared memory parallel algorithm to compute the Reeb graph a scalar function defined on a triangulated surface with or without a boundary. In addition, our algorithm provides a fast method for retrieving the surface data from the constructed Reeb graph. Existing Reeb graph algorithms lack explicit description of manifold information from the Reeb graph. For this purpose we define an explicit map that associates the Reeb graph data to its corresponding data on the manifold. As an application we show how Reeb graph can be used to identify and calculate curves with certain homological properties on a surface. Finally, we show how the data retrieval aspect of our algorithm along with the curves that can be extracted from the Reeb graph structure can be used for mesh segmentation and mesh parametrization.
Prior work and contribution
---------------------------
Reeb graph literature has is vast and ranges from computational accuracy of the graph to its applications in data analysis and visualization. The first provably correct algorithm to compute a Reeb graph on a triangulated surface was presented by Shinagawa and Kunii in [@shinagawa1991constructing]. Computing Reeb graph in $O(n^2)$ times where $n$ in the number of triangles in the mesh. This time was improved to $O(n \log(n))$ by Cole-McLaughlin et al. [@cole2003loops].
Reeb graphs have also been studied for higher dimensional manifolds and simplicial complexes. An algorithm for computing Reeb graph for a $3$-manifold embedded in $\mathbb{R}^3$ is proposed in [@tierny2009loop]. The first Reeb graph algorithm on an arbitrary simplicial complex is given in [@chiang2005simple]. Pascucci et al. [@cole2003loops], presented an online method that computes the graph by calculating the Reeb graph of the restriction of the input scalar field on the $2$-skeleton of the input mesh. This algorithm can handle a non-manifold input, but its worse case time complexity is quadratic. Reeb graph for a varying scalar function is studied in [@edelsbrunner2004time]. Other Reeb graphs algorithms can be found in [@pascucci2007robust; @doraiswamy2009efficient; @Salman12; @HWW10; @doraiswamy2008efficient]. Approximating Reeb graphs algorithms can be found in [@biasotti2000extended; @hilaga2001topology]. However, such algorithms may lead to inaccurate results. A loop-free Reeb graph, also called a contour tree, has been used extensively in data analysis and data visualization. Algorithms for computing such graphs can be found in [@carr2003computing; @raichel2014avoiding; @chiang2005simple; @van1997contour; @tarasov1998construction]. Contour tree have been used for scientific visualization [@pascucci2004multi], volume rendering [@weber2002topology], terrain applications [@besl1992method; @gupta1995manufacturing]. For a thorough introduction to contour tree and its applications the reader is referred to [@carr2004topological; @raichel2014avoiding] and the references within.
Reeb graphs have been also used to study and analyze points cloud data. The applications are numerous including data skeletonization [@ge2011data], retrieving topological information from point data such as homology group computation [@dey2011; @ch], locus cut [@dey2009cut], data abstraction [@natali2011graph], and recovering structural information of a scalar function on a point data [@chazal2009analysis]. In the context of point cloud, a relatively recent constructed named Recently, *Mapper* [@singh2007topological] has received a lot of attention, as it generalizes both the Reeb graph and contour tree. Mapper has found numerous applications [@lum2013extracting; @nicolau2011topology; @robles2017shape; @rosen2018using] and has been studied from multiple perspectives [@carriere2015structure; @dey2017topological; @munch2015convergence; @hajij2018mog].
There is rich literature in computer graphics regarding the use of the Reeb graph. Reeb Graph has been used in mesh segmentation [@xiao2003discrete], shape similarity [@tung2005augmented], shape matching [@mohamed2012reeb], feature-extraction [@bajaj1997contour], surface reconstruction [@biasotti2000surface], extracting tunnel and handle loops of a surface [@dey2008computing], removing tiny handle in an iso-surface [@wood2004removing] and shape matching [@hilaga2001topology]. See also [@biasotti2008reeb] for further applications of Reeb graph in computer graphics. Our algorithm relies on Morse theory to find a finite set of paths traced concurrently inside parts of the manifold where the topology of the manifold with respect to a given scalar function does not change. The sequential algorithm that we present here is essentially similar to Reeb graph algorithm given in [@doraiswamy2008efficient], where tracing paths inside cylinders were used to construct the Reeb graph. We provide the sequential version of the parallel algorithm in this paper because it has some major differences from the algorithm given [@doraiswamy2008efficient]. However our main contributions and focus, which are listed below, are not the sequential Reeb graph algorithm.
The demand to compute large data sets has increased in the last decade and hence the consideration of topological computations parallelization. Multiple attempts have been made in this direction, including multicore homology computation [@lewis2014multicore] spectral sequence parallelization [@lipsky2011spectral], distributed contour tree [@morozov2012distributed], distributed merge tree [@morozov2013distributed], and distributed Mapper [@hajij2017distributed]. In this paper, we give a parallel Reeb graph algorithm on arbitrary triangulated mesh with and without a boundary. We prove the correctness of our method using fundamental theorems in Morse Theory. Moreover, we discuss the performance results that compare our approach to a reference sequential Reeb graph algorithm. We then show how we can use the Reeb graph to retrieve certain curves on the manifold. Finally, we utilize the data retrieval aspect of our algorithm and give an application to surface segmentation.
This article has the following contributions:
1. We give an efficient parallel algorithm that computes the Reeb graph of piece-wise linear function defined on a triangulated $2$-manifold with and without a boundary.
2. Our method can be used to retrieve the manifold data from the Reeb graph. In other words, given a point in the Reeb graph, we give an efficient method to retrieve the manifold data that corresponds to that point.
3. We show how the homological properties of a Reeb graph can be used to extract certain curves on a surface and we utilize our algorithms to give a mesh segmentation algorithm.
4. The algorithms presented here are easy to implement and require minimal memory storage.
Morse theory and Reeb graphs
============================
In this section, we review the basic background needed in this paper. We start by reviewing the basics of Morse theory and Reeb graphs on a smooth manifolds. Then we discuss the corresponding piece-wise linear version. For more details on Morse theory the reader is referred to [@matsumoto2002introduction; @banyaga2013lectures].
Morse theory
------------
Morse Theory is a tool in differential topology that is concerned with the relations between the geometric and topological aspects of manifolds and the real-valued functions defined on them. One of the primary interest in this theory is the relationship between the topology of a smooth manifold $M$ and the critical points of a real-valued smooth function $f$ defined on $M$. Intuitively, Morse theory studies the topological changes of the level sets of a real-valued smooth function as the height of $f$ varies. Morse theory was first introduced by Morse [@morse1934calculus] for infinite dimensional spaces. A comprehensive introduction to Morse theory on finite-dimensional manifolds is given [@milnor1963morse]. Also see [@matsumoto2002introduction; @banyaga2013lectures]. Morse theory has been proven to be a very useful tool in computer graphics, geometric data processing and understanding. The theory was extended to triangulated $2$-manifolds by [@critical1967]. Recently, Morse theory has found applications in global surface parameterization [@guo2006meshless], finding a fundamental domain of a surface [@fair2004], surface quadrangulation [@dong2006spectral], topological matching [@hilaga2001topology], implicit surfaces [@stander1997guaranteeing], surface segmentation [@yamazaki2006segmenting], spline construction [@wang2009geometry] and many other applications.
Let $M$ be a compact and smooth $n$-manifold and let $I=[a,b]\subseteq \mathbb{R} $, where $a<b$, be a closed interval. Let $f:M \longrightarrow I$ be a smooth function defined on $M$. A point $x \in M$ is called a *critical point* of $f$ if the differential $df_x$ is zero. A value $c$ in $\mathbb{R}$ is called a *critical value* of $f$ is $f^{-1}(c)$ contains a critical point of $f$. A point in $M$ is called a *regular point* if it is not a critical point. Similarly, if a value $c \in \mathbb{R}$ is not a critical value then we call it a regular value. The inverse function theorem implies that for every regular value $c$ in $I$ the level set $f^{-1}(c)$ is a is a disjoint union of $n-1$ manifolds. In particular, when $n=2$, then $f^{-1}(c)$ is a disjoint union of simple closed curves. A critical point is called *non-degenerate* if the matrix of the second partial derivatives of $f$, called the *Hessian matrix*, is non-singular. A differentiable function $f:M\longrightarrow I$ is called *Morse* if all its critical points are non-degenerate and all critical values are distinct. If the manifold $M$ has boundary, i.e. $\partial M \neq \emptyset $, then we will also require two other conditions: (1) $f^{-1}(\partial I) = \partial M$ and (2) there are no critical points on $\partial M$. In other words, the boundary points in the interval $I$, the values in $\partial I$, are regular values for the function $f$. The *index* of a critical point $x$ of $f$, denoted by $index_f(x)$, is defined to be the number of negative eigenvalues of its Hessian matrix. For instance the Hessian of a scalar function on smooth surface is a $2\times 2$ symmetric matrix. Hence, the index of $f$ on a critical point takes the values $0,1$ or $2$. In this case an index 0, 1 and 2 of a critical point of a function $f$ is nothing more than a local minimum, a saddle and a local maximum for $f$, respectively.
If $f$ is a Morse function on a surface then, up to a change of coordinates, the surface around a critical point $f$ takes one of the three shapes illustrated in Figure \[minmaxsaddle\]. More formally we have the following important Lemma:
(Morse Lemma) Let $M$ be a smooth surface, $f:M \longrightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a smooth function and $p$ be a non-degenerate critical point of $f$. We can choose a chart $(\phi,U)$ around $p$ such that $f \circ \phi^{-1}$ takes exactly one of the following three forms:\
1. Local minimum — $f \circ \phi^{-1}(X,Y)= X^2+Y^2+c$.
2. Saddle — $f \circ \phi^{-1}(X,Y)= X^2-Y^2+c$.
3. Local maximum — $f \circ \phi^{-1}(X,Y)= -X^2-Y^2+c$.
An analogous lemma holds for Morse functions on higher dimensional smooth manifolds. See [@matsumoto2002introduction] for more details. Morse Lemma implies that a Morse function around a critical point looks simple, and it is exactly one of the forms given in the Lemma, above up to change of coordinates. Notice that the number of minus signs in the standard form of the function $f$ around $p$ is equal to the index of the critical point $p$.
Reeb graphs
-----------
Let $M$ be a topological space and let $f:M\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a scalar function defined on $M$. The Reeb graph of the pair $f$ and $M$ gives a summary of the topological information encoded in by tracking changes occurring to the connected components of the level sets of $f$. More precisely, the *Reeb graph* of $M$ and $f$ is the quotient space $R(M,f)$ of $M$ defined as follows. We say the $x$ and $y$ are equivalent in $M$, and write $x \sim y$, if and only if they belong to the same connected component of $f^{-1}(r)$ for some $r\in \mathbb{R}$. The quotient space $M/\sim
= R(M,f)$ with the quotient space topology induced by the quotient map $\pi: M\longrightarrow R(M,f)$ is called the Reeb graph of $M$ and $f$. Recall here that the map $\pi$ takes a point $x$ in $M$ to its equivalence class $[x]$ in $R(M,f)$. Given a point $p$ in $R(M,f)$, it is often important in practice to retrieve the the set of points in $M$ that map to $p$ via $\pi$. In this article, we provide an efficient method to retrieve the data in $X$ associated to a point on a Reeb graph.
The map $\pi$ induces a continuous function $\bar{f}:R(M,f)\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}$, where $\bar{f}(p) = f(x)$ if $p= \pi(x)$. This map is well defined since $f(x) = f(y)$ whenever $\pi(x) = \pi(y)$.
When $M$ is a manifold, and $f$ is a Morse, then $R(M,f)$ exhibits certain additional properties. For instance, in this case every vertex of $R(X,f)$ arises from a critical point of $f$ or a boundary component. Furthermore, every maximum or minimum of $f$ gives rise to a degree $1$-node of $R(M,f)$. Saddle points for a Morse function $f$ defined on a $2$-manifold have degree $3$-node. This is not guaranteed if the scalar function is not Morse. See Figure \[Reebexample\] for an example of a Reeb graph.
(-240,165)[$f$]{}
Reeb graphs on triangulated surfaces
====================================
Morse function in the piece-wise linear setting
-----------------------------------------------
In this paper we will be working with triangulated surfaces. We will denote to the vertices, edges and faces of a triangulated mesh $M$ by $V(M)$, $E(M)$ and $F(M)$ respectively. The extension of Morse theory to triangulated manifolds was by given Banchoff [@critical1967]. Let $M$ be a triangulated $2$-manifold and let $f :M\longrightarrow [a,b]\subset \mathbb{R}$ be piece-wise linear function on $M$. The star of $v$, denoted by $star(v)$, is the set of simplices that intersect with the vertex $v$. The *closure* $\overline{star(v)}$ of $star(v)$ is the smallest simplicial complex of $M$ that contains $star(v)$. The *link* $Lk(v)$ consists of the set of vertices of $M$ that belong $\overline{star(v)}$ but do not belong to $star(v)$. The *upper link* of $v$ is defined to be the set: $$Lk^+(v)=\{ u \in Lk(v): f(u)>f(v)\}\cup\{ [u,v]\in Lk(v): f(u)>f(v) \},$$ the lower link is defined similarly by: $$Lk^{-}(v)=\{u \in Lk(v): f(u)<f(v)\}\cup\{ [u,v]\in Lk(v): f(u)<f(v) \},$$ and *mixed link* $$Lk^{\pm}(v)=\{ [u_1,u_2] : f(u_1)< f(v) < f(u_2)\}.$$ Using the link definitions, we classify vertices of $M$ as follows. A vertex $v$ in $M$ is *PL regular* if the cardinality $|Lk^{\pm}(v)|$ of $Lk^{\pm}(v)$ is equal to $2$. If $|Lk^+(v)|=0$, then $v$ is a *PL maximum* vertex with index $1$, and if $|Lk^-(v)|=0$, then $v$ is a *PL minimum* with index $0$. If $|Lk^{\pm(v)}|=2+2m$, then $v$ is a PL saddle with index $1$ and multiplicity $m\geq 1$. See Figure \[classification\]. A PL function $f:V\longrightarrow [a,b] \subset \mathbb{R}$ is *PL Morse function* if each vertex is either PL regular or PL simple, and the function values of the vertices are distinct. Similar to the smooth case, when $\partial M \neq \emptyset $, we assume further that $f$ satisfies: (1)$f^{-1}(\partial [a,b]) = \partial M$ and (2)there are no critical points on $\partial M$.
![The types of vertices on a triangulated mesh. From left to right: minimum, maximum, regular vertex, saddle.[]{data-label="classification"}](critical)
There are other ways to define a Morse function of a manifold with a boundary. See for instance [@cole2004loops]. Our choice here will be utilized the parallelization of the Reeb graph algorithm and the application section \[application\].
Reeb graphs of general simplicial complexes
-------------------------------------------
Reeb graph can be defined naturally on arbitrary simplicial complexes. Let $K$ be a simplicial complex and $f:K \longrightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a simplicial map defined on the vertices of $K$. The map $f$ can be extended linearly to all simplices of $K$ to PL function which we will denote also denote by $f$. Using this function, the Reeb graph of $(K,f)$ can be defined as before.
Reeb graph sequential algorithm on triangulated surfaces
========================================================
In this section we assume that we are given a PL function $f:M\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}$ defined on a traingulated surface $M$ possibly with a non-empty boundary $\partial M$. This includes the case when $f$ is a Morse function. Then we discuss the degenerate case, when $f$ has non-simple saddles.
As mentioned, the sequential algorithm that we present here is similar to Reeb graph algorithm given in [@doraiswamy2008efficient]. We provide the sequential version of the algorithm because it has some keys differences from the algorithm given [@doraiswamy2008efficient] that will be utilized later in our parallel algorithm.
The main idea of the algorithm is the construction of a sub-simplicial complex $X$ of $M$ such that the Reeb graph $R(X,f|_X)$ of $X$ with respect to $f|_X$, the restriction of $f$ on $X$, is identical to the Reeb graph $R(M,f)$. The constructed simplicial complex $X$ does not only provide us with a Reeb graph of $(M,f)$ but also implies immediately an algorithm to compute the map $F:R(M,f)\longrightarrow M$ that allows us to extract the manifold data given the corresponding Reeb graph points. The main two ingredients of the algorithm are the *critical sets* and the *ascending paths*. We introduce these two concepts next.
Critical sets and ascending paths {#critical sets}
---------------------------------
We start by giving the definition of critical sets then we give the definition of ascending paths.\
**Critical sets.** Let $p$ be a saddle point of $f$, and let $t_p$ be its corresponding critical value. Consider the connected components of the set $f^{-1}(t_p)$. The connected components of $f^{-1}(t_p)$ consist of a collection of simple closed curves embedded in $M$, as well as a single component, which contains a singularity. This *singular set* consists of multiple circles that intersect at the critical point $p$. We will denote this singular set by $C_{p}$. See Figure \[Critical set\] for an example. Note that for critical value $t$ $f^{-1}(t_p)$ might consist merely of the critical set $C_{p}$ ( with no other simple closed curves ).
Choose $\epsilon >0$ small enough such that the interval $[t_p-\epsilon,t_p+\epsilon]$ has only the critical value $t_p$. As we move from $t_p$ to $t_p-\epsilon$, the singular set $C_p$ becomes a non-singular one consisting of a disjoint union of simple closed curves $A_1,...A_n$, for $n\geq 1$. By convection we will consider the sets $A_1,...,A_n$ to be the *connected components of the singular set* $C_p$, and we will refer to them as such for the rest of the paper. We talk more about about the components of a critical set and show exactly how to determine them in the piece-wise linear setting in Section \[critical sets details\]. The following Lemma asserts that the number of connected components of $C_p$ of for a simple saddle point of a Morse function defined on surface is either $1$ or $2$.
\[lemma\] Let $M$ be a compact connected orientable surface with a Morse function $M\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}$. If $f$ has a unique saddle point then $M$ is homeomorphic to a pair of pants. See Figure \[pants\].
(-165,84)[$p$]{} (-70,84)[$p$]{} (0,80)[$t_p$]{}
(-150,41)[$p$]{} (-50,34)[$p$]{}
For a regular value $t$, we will denote to the number of simple closed curves of $f^{-1}(t)$ by $|f^{-1}(t)|$. Lemma \[lemma\] implies that for a sufficiently small enough $\epsilon$ and for any saddle point $p$ on a Morse function $f$, one has $|f^{-1}(t_p+\epsilon)|-|f^{-1}(t_p-\epsilon)|=\pm 1$. In other words, as we are passing through a saddle point $p$ two circles merge or split. Figure \[pants\] shows two types of saddles: . A saddle point $p$ is a split saddle if $|f^{-1}(t_p+\epsilon)|-|f^{-1}(t_p-\epsilon)|= 1$, and it is a merge saddle if $|f^{-1}(t_p+\epsilon)|-|f^{-1}(t_p-\epsilon)|= -1$.
The sequential version of the algorithm relies on Lemma \[lemma\] to handle the case when the function $f$ is Morse and has only simple saddle points. The case when $f$ has saddle points with higher multiplicities will be handled in Section \[degenerate\].
If $p$ is a maximum and minimum point, then by definition, $C_p$ will be the set that consists of the point $p$ itself.
**Ascending paths.** The second main ingredient of the sequential Reeb graph algorithm is a collection of curves that we trace inside the manifold $M$ using the function values. more precisely, an *ascending path* from a non-maximum vertex $v_0$, denoted by $apath(v_0)$, is defined to be a finite sequence of consecutive edges $\{[v_0,v_1],...,[v_{k-1},v_k]\}$ on $M$, such that $[v_i,v_{i+1}]$ is an edge on $M$ for $0\leq i \leq k-1$, $f(v_{i+1})>f(v_{i})$, and $v_k$ is a maximum, a boundary or a saddle vertex.
Outline of the sequential algorithm {#alg}
-----------------------------------
We present now the outline of the sequential Reeb graph algorithm. We assume that we are given a triangulated PL Morse function $f:M \longrightarrow [a,b] \subset \mathbb{R}$ defined on triangulated mesh $M$ without boundary. The case when the function $f$ is not Morse, or when the $M$ has a boundary, will be discussed in later sections.
The sequential Reeb graph algorithm is given in the following steps:
1. We start by sorting the critical points of $f$ by their critical values. Let $CP$ be the set of the sorted critical points of $f$ in an ascending order.
2. Foe each critical point of the function $f$ we define a node in the in the Reeb graph $R(M,f)$. In other words, the node set of the graph $R(M,f)$ corresponds precisely to the set of critical points of the function $f$ defined on $M$.
3. For each critical point $v$ in $CP$ we compute the critical set $C_v$.
4. For each saddle or a minimum vertex $v$ in $CP$, we associated one or two ascending paths on the mesh: one ascending path if $v$ is a minimum or a merge saddle and two paths if $v$ is a split saddle. For each ascending path, we march with until this path intersects with the first critical $C_w$ set with a higher critical value than of $t_v$. At this point we insert an edge for the Reeb graph $R(M,f)$ between the vertex $v$ and the vertex $w$.
(-410,145)[$(1)$]{} (-310,145)[$(2)$]{} (-200,145)[$(3)$]{} (-80,145)[$(4)$]{}
Figure \[Reebexamplealg\] illustrates the steps of the algorithm. It remains to describe two aspects of the previous algorithm : the construction of the critical sets mentioned in step (3) and the construction of an the ascending paths mentioned in step (4).
### Construction of the critical sets {#critical sets details}
We now describe how to compute the critical set of a critical point in the piece-wise setting. As before we assume that $f:M\longrightarrow [a,b] \subset \mathbb{R}$ a piece-wise linear function defined on a triangulated surface $M$, and it takes distinct values on the vertices of $M$. This assumption will guarantee that for a given value $t$, the level curve $f^{-1}(t)$ intersects with at most one vertex of $M$.
Now let $t \in \mathbb{R}$. The *cross simplices* $CR_f(t)$ of the value $t $ is the union of all simplices of $M$, which intersect with the level curve $f^{-1}(t)$. This is the set of vertices, edges and faces in $M$, which intersect with the level curve $f^{-1}(t)$. If $f(t)=v$ for a vertex $v$ in $V(M)$, then we also define $\overline{ CR_f(t)}$ to be $ CR_f(t) \cup \overline{star(v)}$.
When $t$ is the maximal or the minimal value, then $CR_f(t)$ consists of a single vertex $v_t$. In this case $\overline{ CR_f(t)}$ is simply $\overline{star(v_t)}$. When $t$ is a regular value, $CR_f(t)$ is a disjoint union of topological cylinders, that is $CR_f(t)$ appears as a “thickened” band around the curve $f^{-1}(t).$ Note that when the value $t$ corresponding to a vertex $v$ in $V(M)$ with $f(v)=t$ for some $v$ in $M$, then $CR_f(t) \cap f^{-1}(t)=\{v\}$. When $t$ is critical value of a saddle point then the curve $f^{-1}(t)$ consists of a finite collection of simple close curves that meet at the saddle point and the the set $\overline{ CR_f(t)}$ can be seen as the thickened band of these curves. See Figure \[levelset1\].
The *lower level* of the cross subsimplex of a value $t$, denoted by $L(\overline{ CR_f(t) } )$, is the set of vertices and edges in $\overline{ CR_f(t) }$ which have values less than or equal to $t$. Similarly, the *higher level* of the cross subsimplex of a value $t$, denoted by $H(\overline{ CR_f(t) } )$, is the set of vertices and edges in $\overline{ CR_f(t) } $ which have values higher than or equal to $t$. See Figure \[levelset1\].
Recall the notion of the connected component of a critical set from Section \[critical sets\]. Specifically, for a critical vertex $v$ with a critical value $t_v$, we talked about the connected components of the critical set $ C_{v}$. Using the definitions we introduced in this section we can computed the connected components of the critical set $ C_{v}$ in the piece-wise linear setting by considering the connected components of $L(\overline{ CR_f(t_v)})$.
### Construction of the ascending paths {#ascending}
The ascending paths form a critical point $v_0$ are specified as follows:
1. If $v_0$ is a merge saddle or a minimum then we initiate a single ascending path $apath(v_0)$ specified as follows. Let $v_1$ be a vertex in $Lk^+(v_0)$ such that $f(v_1)>f(v_0)$. At the $k^{th}$ iteration $apath(v_0)$ consists of $\{[v_0,v_1],...[v_{k-1},v_k]\}$ with $f(v_{i+1})>f(v_{i})$ for $0\leq i \leq k-1$.
2. If $v_0$ is a split saddle, then we start two ascending paths $P_1$ and $P_2$ starting from the point $p$ specified as follows. Divide the set $Lk^+(p)$ into two disconnected components $A$ and $B$. Choose the vertex $v_A$ in $A$, such that $f(v_A)> f(v)$ for all $v \in A$, and choose the vertex $v_B$ in a similar manner. At the $k^{th}$ iteration $P_1$ consists of $\{[v_0,v_A],...[v_{k-1},v_k]\}$ with $f(v_i)>f(v_{i-1})$ for $0\leq i \leq k-1$ (here we assume $v_1=v_A$). The path $P_2$ is constructed similarly.
### Termination of an ascending path
The condition at which we terminate the ascending paths we initiated in step $(4)$ is specified as follows. Assume that at the $k^{th}$ iteration an ascending path starting from the vertex $p$ is $\{[v,v_1],...[v_{k-1},v_k]\}$. We continue this iteration until we arrive at an edge $E_n=[v_{n-1},v_n]$ with $f(v_n)>f(v)$ where $v$ is the critical point with a critical value right after the critical value of the critical point $v$. At this point we check the condition $C_{w}\cap E_{n} \neq \emptyset$. If this condition is satisfied then we insert an edge for the Reeb graph $R(M,f)$ between the vertex $v$ and the vertex $w$. If $C_{w}\cap E_{n} = \emptyset$ then we keep marching until the critical point $w$ with the lowest critical value that satisfies the condition $f(w)>f(v)$ as well as $C_{w}\cap E_{n} \neq \emptyset$. Note that $w$ can be either a saddle or a maximum vertex.
The check of intersection between the edge $E_n$ in an ascending path and a critical set $C_{w}$, mentioned in step (4), can be done by checking if $E_n$ belongs with $CR_f(w)$.
\[potential\] It is important to notice how an ascending path corresponds to an edge in the Reeb graph. The ascending path starts at a critical point $p$ with a critical value $t_p$ and terminates at a critical set that corresponds to a critical point $q$ with a critical value $t_q$ with $t_q>t_p$. More precisely, an ascending path starts at one of the connected components of the upper link of a critical point $p$ and ends at the one of the connected components of the critical sets $C_{q}$. If two ascending paths starts at two different connected components of the upper link of $p$ but still end up in the *same connected component* of $C_{q}$ then these two paths correspond to the exact same edge in the Reeb graph. Therefore only one of these ascending paths corresponds to an edge in the final Reeb graph. For this reason we say that each ascending path starting from a connected component of the upper star of a vertex gives rise to a *potential* edge in the Reeb graph. We give more details on this point in Section \[degenerate\].
Surfaces with boundaries
------------------------
In the case when the surface $M$ has a boundary we modify the previous algorithm as follows. In this case $f^{-1}(\partial I)= f^{-1}({a}) \cup f^{-1}({b})$ is not empty and consists of a finite collection of simply closed curves. We treat each connected component of $f^{-1}(a)$ as a minimal point, and we treat with the boundary $f^{-1}(b)$ as a maximum point. More precisely, the following modifications are added to the previous algorithm from Section \[alg\].
- In step $(2)$, each connected component in $f^{-1}(\partial I)$ is considered a vertex in the Reeb graph vertex set.
- In step $(3)$, for each boundary component in $f^{-1}(a)$, we pick an arbitrary vertex on the boundary and initiate an ascending path starting.
- In step $(4)$, if an ascending path starting at a vertex $v$ reaches a boundary vertex $w$ in one of the connected components, say $Bndry_w$, of $f^{-1}(b)$, then we insert an edge in the Reeb graph $R(M,f)$ between the vertex $v$ and the vertex in $R(M,f)$ that corresponds to $Bndry_w$.
We denote the subcomplex obtained from $M$ using the previous algorithm by $X_{M,f}$. In other words, $X_{M,f}$ consists of the critical sets $C_p$ for all critical point $p$, as well as the ascending paths we initiated at saddle, minimum or boundary vertices. When $M$ and $f$ are clear from the context, we will denote to $X_{M,f}$ simply by $X$.
Correctness of the sequential algorithm
---------------------------------------
For a function $f:M\longrightarrow [a,b]$ and a $c \in \mathbb{R}$ define: $$M_c:=\{ x\in M |f(x) \leq c \}.$$ Note that we allow $M_c$ to be empty. Moreover, define : $$M_{[c,d]}:=\{ x\in M |c \leq f(x) \leq d \}.$$
The correctness of our algorithm relies on the following two facts :
1. The only topological changes to the level sets of $f$ occur when as pass a critical point. This is stated formally in Theorem \[same topology\].
2. The structure of the manifold around a critical point is completely determined by the index of that critical point. We give this in Theorem \[main thm\].
The proof of Theorems \[same topology\] and \[main thm\] can be found in [@milnor1963morse].
\[same topology\] Let $f : M \longrightarrow [a,b]$ be a smooth function on a smooth surface M. For two reals $a, b$, with $a < b$, if $f$ has no critical values in the interval $[a, b]$, then the surfaces $M_a$ and $M_b$ are homeomorphic.
Our algorithm relies on Theorem \[same topology\]. Namely, as we trace an ascending paths, we assume that no topological change occur until we reach the next critical point. The ascending path may not terminate at the next critical point, provided the part of the manifold in which this path is traveling in has not changed its topology. This will more evident after we provide the next theorem, which shows the exact structure of $M_{[c,d]}$ around a critical point.
\[main thm\] Let $M$ be a compact connected surface, possibly with boundary and let $f:M\longrightarrow [a,b]$ be a Morse function on $M$. Let $p$ be a critical point, and let $t$ be its corresponding critical value. Let $\epsilon >0$ be small enough so that $I_\epsilon:=[\epsilon-t,\epsilon +t]$ has only the critical value $t$.
1. If $index(p)$ is equal to 0 or 2, then $M_{I_\epsilon}$ is homeomorphic to a disjoint union of a disk and a finite number of topological cylinders (that is a genus zero surface with two boundary components).
2. If $index(p)=1$, then $M_{I_\epsilon}$ is homeomorphic to a pair of pants and finite number of topological cylinders.
The previous two theorems show that for a given Morse $f$ function on $M$, we can arrange $M$ so that at each critical point only a single topological event occurs, and this topological event occurs around the critical point. Moreover, we know exactly what topological event occurs by the index of the critical point. This is illustrated in the Figure \[correctness\].
This shows that any 2-manifold can be built from the building blocks in Figure \[building blocks\]. Moreover, Theorem \[main thm\] shows that the restriction of Reeb graph of the restriction of $f$ on $M_{I_\epsilon}$ has the shapes given in Figure \[ascending paths\]. In other words, this gives us the structure of the Reeb graph around an interval $I_{\epsilon}$ that contains a single critical value.
Moreover, subcomplex $X_{M,f}$ constructed in the algorithm has the same Reeb graph structure of $M$ around the critical points. More specifically, the algorithm creates an ascending path for each minimum and merge critical point and two such paths for a split saddle. Moreover, the algorithm terminates as ascending path when it passes from a critical set. See Figure \[ascending paths\].
Now let $e=(p,q)$ be an edge in a Reeb graph $R(M,f)$ connecting between the two nodes $p$ and $q$, which correspond to critical points of $f$. For each such edge, we can find a preimage arc $E$ in $M$ that is mapped to $R(M,f)$ via the map $\pi: M\longrightarrow R(M,f)$. The preimages of the points $p$ and $q$ under $\pi$ are the critical set $C_p$ and $C_q$ in $M$, respectively. Hence each arc $E$ must start at a point $A$ in $C_p$ and end at a point in $B$ in $C_q$. Each such an arc on $M$ characterizes the edge $e$.
An ascending path constructed in the sequential algorithm essentially traces an arc in the way described above. Namely, for a critical point $p$, with a critical value $f(p)$, an ascending path created at a point $p$ will terminate at a critical point point $q$ with $f(q)>f(p)$. This termination occurs when we pass through the critical set of the point $q$.
Dealing with the degenerate cases {#degenerate}
---------------------------------
It is possible in practice to obtain a scalar function with saddle points that have multiplicity $m \geq 2$. The algorithm that we present in Section \[alg\] can be extended to handle such cases. We need to do the following modifications.
- In step (3) we calculate the connected components of the critical set $C_p$. Here it is not enough to calculate the critical set $C_p$. We need to also to compute the connected components of this set. This was explained in Section \[critical sets details\].
- When the multiplicity $m$ of a split saddle $p$ is greater than or equal to $2$ we create an ascending path for each connected component in $Lk^+(p)$.
In the non-degenerate case every ascending path corresponds to an edge in the Reeb graph. This is not the case anymore in the degenerate case. We describe next the sequential algorithm of the Reeb graph when $f$ has degenerate critical points.
1. Sort the critical points of $f$ an in ascending order. Let $CP=\{v_1,...,v_n\}$ be this set. This represents the vertex set of the Reeb graph, as we did before.
2. For each $v$ in $CP$, compute the connected components of $C_v$ and include all these component in a single container $\mathcal{S}$. We will denote by $B^j_i$ to be the connected component $j$ of the critical set $C_{v_i}$. In this way we index all elements in $\mathcal{S}$.
3. Declare each set $B^j_i$ of $\mathcal{S}$ as not visited.
4. For each critical point $v_i$ in $CP$ and for each component in $Lk^{+}(v_i)$, we initiate an ascending path $P$ as described in Section \[ascending\]. For each such path, we determine the connected component $B^l_k$ in $\mathcal{S}$, which the path terminates at as described in Section \[critical sets details\]. We have two cases:
1. If the connected component $B^l_k$ is not visited, then we insert an edge between $v_i$ and $v_k$ and mark the component $B^l_k$ as visited.
2. If the connected component $B^l_k$ is visited, then we do not make any changes to the Reeb graph and terminate the current ascending path. In this case the ascending path corresponds to an edge that already exists in the Reeb graph. See Remark \[potential\].
Note that the above procedure can be used to determine an the edges originating from a simple saddle. Namely, we do not need to check the type of the simple saddle point (merge or split) in step (3) of the algorithm given in Section \[alg\], and for any saddle point we use the above procedure instead.
Parallelization of the algorithm
=================================
In this section we give the details of our strategy to compute the Reeb graph in parallel. We describe the three stages of the parallel algorithm as follows.
1. **The partition stage**. In this stage we partition the manifold $M$ into submanifolds such that the vertices counts of each submanifold are approximately equal to each other.
2. **Computing the Reeb graph for the submanifold stage**. Computing the Reeb graphs for each submanifold obtained from stage one concurrently.
3. **The gluing stage**. In this step we glue the Reeb graphs obtained from the stage 2.
The partition stage
-------------------
In this first stage of the parallel algorithm we sort the vertices of the manifold with respect to the function $f$. This step can be done efficiently in parallel [@tsigas2003simple; @singler2007mcstl]. The critical sets for saddle points are then determined by assigning a thread to each saddle point. This computation is only necessarily to determine the number of ascending paths that we need to initiate from that saddle point. Next we partition the manifold $M$ to submanifolds along certain regular values of the scalar function $f$. More precisely the partition stage is given as follows:
1. Compute the critical points of $f$ by assigning a thread to each vertex in $M$. Let $p_1, p_2, ..., p_n$ be the list critical points of $f$, and let $t_1, t_2, ..., t_n$ be their corresponding critical values.
2. We choose $k$ regular values $C=\{c_1,\cdots,c_k\}$ of $f$. These values will be utilized to slice the manifold $M$ into $k+1$ submanifolds $M_1$,...,$M_{k+1}$, such that the vertex count of the submanifolds are approximately equal to each other. We also need to determine the connected components $f^{-1}(c_i)$ for $c_i$ in $C$. The connected components of the regular value $c_i \in C$ can be computed in linear time with respect to the number of edges in $M$ as follows. We visit all edges of $M$ and detect if an edge crosses one of the values $c_i$. If such an edge is found at a level $c_i$, then we keep rotating around to find all other edges crossing the value $c_i$ within the same connected component of $f^{-1}(c_i)$. After visiting all edges, we also will have determined the connected components of $f^{-1}(c_i)$ for each $c_i \in C$. We will denote the set of all connected components of $f^{-1}(c_i)$ for $1 \leq i \leq k $ by $\mathcal{C}_f$. We also call an edge in $M$ that crosses $f^{-1}(c_i)$ a *crossing edge*. See Figure \[fig:stage1\] for an illustration.
3. Divide the surface $M$ into $k+1$ partitions along the level sets $f^{-1}(c_i)$ for all $c_i \in C$. We obtain a list of submanifolds $M_{[c_{0},c_1]}$,...,$M_{[c_{k},c_{k+1}]}$. Here we set $c_0=t_1$ and $c_{k+1}=t_n$. We will denote to $M_{[c_{i-1},c_{i}]}$ by $M_{i}$. The set $\{ M_i |1 \leq i \leq k+1 \}$ will be denoted by $\mathcal{M}_f$.
4. Next we extend $M_i$ by adding other vertices in $M$ as follows. Let $E_{i-1}$ and $E_{i}$ be the edges in $M$ that intersect with $f^{-1}(c_{i-1})$ and $f^{-1}(c_{i})$, respectively. The submanifold $M^{\prime}_i=M^{\prime}_{[c_{i-1},c_{i}]}$ is obtained from $M_{[c_{i-1},c_{i}]}$ by adding the vertices from $E_{i-1}$ and $E_{i}$. We call the edges $E_{i-1}$ and $E_{i}$ the boundary edges of $M^{\prime}_{[c_{i-1},c_{i}]}$. Note that every two consecutive submanifolds from $ \mathcal {M}_{f}$ intersect with each other along their boundary edges. See Figure \[fig:stage3\] for an illustration.
The purpose of extending the submanifolds $M_{i}$ to $M^{\prime}_{i}$ in step (3) will be justified in the gluing stage in Section \[the gluing stage\].
(-23,51)[$M_i$]{} (3,40)[$M^{\prime}_i$]{} (-370,-15)[(a)]{} (-250,-15)[(b)]{} (-90,-15)[(c)]{}
Computing the Reeb graph of each submanifold {#second stage}
--------------------------------------------
The manifold $M^{\prime}_i$ is in general homeomorphic to the manifold $M_i$, since the former is obtained from the latter by extending its boundary slightly. However, in the piece-wise linear case the extension specified in the previous section may change the topology of the manifold. This will occur when a crossing edge in $E_i$ or $E_{i-1}$ contain a critical vertex of $f$. When this case occurs, we exclude this vertex from $\mathcal{M}^{\prime}_i$ in order to keep it homeomorphic to $M_i$. Using this convention, we can assume that the Reeb graph of the restriction of $f$ on $M_{i}$ is identical to the Reeb graph of the restriction of the Reeb graph of $f$ on $M^{\prime}_{i}$.
Computing the Reeb graphs $R(M^{\prime}_i,f)$ for $M^{\prime}_{i}$, for $1\leq i \leq k+1 $, now goes as follows. To each connected component in $M^{\prime}_{i}$ for $1\leq i \leq k+1 $, we assign a thread and the Reeb graph $R(M^{\prime}_i,f)$ on the submanifold $M^{\prime}_{i}$, which can be computed concurrently.
An ascending path that starts at a crossing edge or ends at an crossing edge will be treated specially. We call the Reeb graph edge that corresponds to such an ascending path a *crossing arc*. Furthermore if the starting or the ending edge of this ascending path is a crossing edge then we will call the corresponding node in the Reeb graph a *crossing node*. Every crossing node is determined by its crossing edge. In other words, given a crossing edge we can recover its crossing node in the graphs $R(M_i^{\prime},f)$ for $1 \leq i \leq k+1$. In practice we need to be able to do this in constant time, so we create a global map $G$ that takes as an input a crossing edge and returns its corresponding crossing node. In the case when a single crossing edge is associated with two crossing nodes from two consecutive submanifolds then the map $G$ associates that edge crossing edge to the two crossing nodes (this occur when is the ending edge of a crossing arc and the starting edge of the crossing arc in the consequent submanifold are the same). If the crossing edge is not associated with any crossing node, then this map returns a constant value indicating that this edge is not a starting or an ending crossing edge for any ascending path. Note that each connected component in $\mathcal{C}_f$ has either two crossing edges that are associated with two crossing nodes or a single crossing edge that is associated with two crossing nodes. This map will be utilized in the gluing stage.
The gluing stage {#the gluing stage}
----------------
For the gluing stage we need to glue the nodes of the Reeb graphs that occur in duplication $C_f$. For this purpose we utilize the function $G$ that we constructed in Section \[second stage\]. For each connected component in $\mathcal{C}_f$, we visit its crossing edges and check if two edges within that connected component have been flagged by $G$. If this is the case, then we retrieve the crossing nodes that corresponds to these two edges via the function $G$ and glue them. In the case when connected component of $\mathcal{C}_f$ has a single crossing edge, then we retrieve the two crossing nodes that corresponds associated with that edge and glue them. When we finish visiting all connected components of $\mathcal{C}_f$, all duplicate nodes will have been glued, and the final graph is $R(M,f)$. See Figure \[fig:stage3\] for an illustration of this process.
(-90,140) (-120,40) (-319,168) (-325,60) (-370,-15)[(a)]{} (-250,-15)[(b)]{} (-10,-15)[(c)]{}
Going from the Reeb graph to the manifold {#Reeb graph to Manifold}
=========================================
In this section we give an algorithm that describes an explicit description of the map $F: R(M,f) \longrightarrow M$. This map associates to every vertex $v$ in the graph $R(M,f)$ to the critical set $C_v$ associated to that critical point. More importantly, for each interior point $p$ of an edge in $R(M,f)$, we want to associate a simple closed curve $Cr$ in $M$ such that $\pi(Cr)=p$.
In the construction above, for our Reeb graph algorithm an edge of the graph $R(M,f)$ is traced as a sequence of edges on the mesh running between two critical sets of the function $f$. This gives an embedding of the edges of the Reeb graph on the surface. This embedding is used to get the circle the corresponding to any points on the graph. More preciously we have the following correspondence. Let $e$ be an edge of the graph $R(M,f)$. By the construction of our algorithm, every edge in $R(M,f)$ is determined by two critical points and a sequence of oriented edges on the mesh. Let $\mathcal{E}_e:=\{E_1,\cdots,E_n\}$ be the sequence of oriented edges on the mesh $M$ that corresponds to the edge $e$. If $E_i=[v_i,v_{i+1}]$ then we will denote by $l_f(E_i)$ to $|f(v_i)-f(v_{i+1})|$. Let $T_j(\mathcal{E}_e)$ be the summation $\sum_{i=1}^j l_f(E_i)$ where $1\leq j\leq n$.
An interior point $p$ on the edge $e$ is specified by giving a value $t_p$ in the interval $(0,1)$. To obtain the circle $Cr_p$ on the mesh $M$ that correspond to $p$ we do the following procedure:
1. Map the interval $(0,1)$ linearly to the interval $(0,T_n(\mathcal{E}_e))$.
2. Use the previous linear function to map $t_p$ to its corresponding value $t^{\prime}$ in $(0,T_n(\mathcal{E}_e))$.
3. Determine the edge $E_k=(p_k,p_{k+1})$ in $\mathcal{E}_e$ such that $T_{k-1}(\mathcal{E}_e)<t^{\prime}\leq T_{k}(\mathcal{E}_e)$.
4. Now we need to find the value $t$, in the range of $[a,b]$, the range of $f$, such that $f^{-1}(t)$ contains $Cr_p$. We know that this value corresponds to $t^{\prime}$, which lies in the interval $[T_{k-1},T_k]$. The required $t$ lies in interval $[f(p_k),f(p_{k+1})]$. Hence, we map the interval $[T_{k-1},T_k]$ linearly to $[f(p_k),f(p_{k+1})]$ and determine the value $t$ in $[f(p_k),f(p_{k+1})]$ that corresponds to $t^{\prime}$.
5. The required circle $Cr_p$ is the connected component of $f^{-1}(t)$ that contains the edge $E_k$.
Note that in the previous procedure we rely on the fundamental assumption that $f$ takes different values on the vertices of the mesh.
Run-time analysis and implementation
====================================
We tested the presented algorithm on meshes with various complexities. Our experiments were done on a AMD FX 6300 6-Core with 32 GB memory. The algorithm was implemented in C++ and Windows platform was used.
We test our test our parallel algorithm with the AIM@SHAPE Repository. This initial attempt did not give us an increase of performance over the sequential algorithm for most meshes available in the above dataset. In order to take advantage of the parallel implementation, we tested our algorithm on high resolution meshes. Specifically, we uniformly increase the resolution of the meshes available AIM@SHAPE library to $200k$. Our implementation on the described above data gave us a minimum speedup of 3.6, a maximum one of 4.3 and an average speedup of 3.8 on 6 cores. Using this we obtain a $63\% $ average parallel efficiency. The details are given in Figure \[perf\]. The $x$-axis represents the number of processes and the $y$-axis shows the speedup. The figure shows how the trends in the curves are increasing monotonically as the number of processes increase.
Applications {#application}
============
Reeb graphs on a surface $M$ encodes a rich amount of topological information from the original surface. In this section we show how the Reeb graph of a surface $M$ gives rise to a natural collection of simple closed curves on $M$. The applications that we present can be described in terms of these curves. We first define these curves and show their relation with the Reeb graph. We then we give a procedure to extract them by utilizing the tools we described in Section \[Reeb graph to Manifold\]. Finally, the curves are utilized to obtain two mesh segmentation algorithms.
While almost all Reeb graph-based segmentation algorithm focus on genus zero surfaces, see for instance [@xiao2003discrete; @xiao2003topological; @tierny2007topology], we present here two mesh segmentation algorithms for surfaces with higher genus.
Let $R(M,f)$ be a surface $M$ and a scalar function $f$. The edges of the Reeb graph $R(M,f)$ determine the following types of simple closed curves on $M$:
- Cutting system curves.
- Pants decomposition curves.
- Branch curves.
We describe how a Reeb graph on a surface can be used to realize these curves next.
[**[Cutting System Curves.]{}**]{} Reeb graphs can also be used to determined the so called *cutting system*. A cutting system for a connected, closed, orientable surface $M$ of genus $g$ is a collection of unordered disjoint simple closed loops embedded in $M$ whose complement $M\backslash ( l_1\sqcup \cdots \sqcup l_g)$ is a sphere with $2g$ boundary components [@hatcher1980presentation]. Segmenting a surface along a cutting system curve yield a genus zero surface with multiple boundary components. Hence this can be used to aid in mesh parametrization. See for intance [@zeng2009generalized] and the references therein. We describe here a Reeb graph-based algorithm to obtain a cutting system. The algorithm goes as follows:
1. Let $T$ be a spanning tree of $R(M,f)$ and consider the edges $e_1,...e_g$ in $R(f)\backslash T$.
2. Select an interior point in $e_i$, for $0\leq i \leq g$.
3. Each interior point selected in the previous step determines a loop $l_i$ which can be obtained using the Reeb graph algorithm we described here.
Figure \[cut system\] show multiple examples of cutting system curves on triangulated surfaces.
[**Pants Decomposition Curves.**]{} A Reeb graph naturally gives rise to a collection of curves that can be used to decompose a surface into a pair of pants. A pair of pant a is a genus zero surface with three boundary components. Beside surface segmentation [@hajij2016segmenting], surface pants decomposition has found applications in mesh parametrization [@kwok2012constructing], surface matching [@li2009surface] and surface classification and indexing [@jin2009computing]. The method to obtain a pants decomposition from the Reeb graph is illustrated in Figure \[pants algorithm\] and is described as follows:
1. Let $R^{\prime}(M,f)$ be the deformation retract of $R(M,f)$. This graph can be obtained by recursively deleting nodes with valency one from $R(M,f)$ and the edge attached to them until no such indices exist. We exclude from this deletion the $1$-valence nodes originating from the boundary of $M$. We also delete all nodes with valency $2$ and combine the two edges that meet at that node to form a single edge. This step is illustrated in step $(3)$ Figure \[pants example\].
2. We select one interior point from each edge in $R^{\prime}(M,f)$, provided this edge does not have a node of valency one.
3. We use the our Reeb algorithm to determine the curves on the surface that correspond to the points that we selected on the graph in the previous step.
The results of the previous algorithm was tested on triangulated meshes with various topological complexities. We show some examples in Figure \[pants example\].
[**Branch Curves.**]{} A branch curve on a surface $M$ is a simple closed curve that bounds a topological disk on $M$. Such a curve is also called null homotopic. A branch curve is determined by a Reeb graph edge which has a vertex of valence one. Note that cutting the surface along a branch curve increases the number of connected components of the surface. Cutting along such curves can be used for segmentation of a genus zero surfaces. There are many Reeb graph-based segmentation algorithms in the literature for segmentation of genus zero surfaces such as the surfaces obtained from a humanoid character. See for instance [@xiao2003discrete; @xiao2003topological; @tierny2007topology]. Since this type of curves is essentially utilized elsewhere in the literature, we simply list it here for for completeness of our discussion. All these methods however lack the description of a method to extract the manifold data from the Reeb graph data.
Conclusion and Future Work
==========================
Parallelization of topological data analysis algorithms is still in its infancy. There are plenty of existing topological machineries such as Morse theory that offer a plethora of tools which can be utilized to obtain robust and efficient parallel algorithms. In this paper we presented a work that utilizes Morse theory to obtain a parallel algorithm for Reeb graph.
The parallel algorithm that we present here has the elements that makes it generalizable to a Reeb graph algorithm on a general simplicial complex. However, we thought that this would make the discussion more complicated in many parts of the algorithm. We plan to peruse this direction in a future work.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS {#acknowledgements .unnumbered}
================
This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation (IIS-1513616).
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'A set $A$ of vertices in an $r$-uniform hypergraph $\mathcal H$ is [*covered in $\mathcal H$*]{} if there is some vertex $u\not\in A$ such that every edge of the form $\{u\}\cup B$, $B\in A^{(r-1)}$ is in $\mathcal H$. Erdős and Moser (1970) determined the minimum number of edges in a graph on $n$ vertices such that every $k$-set is covered. We extend this result to $r$-uniform hypergraphs on sufficiently many vertices, and determine the extremal hypergraphs. We also address the problem for directed graphs.'
author:
- 'Béla Bollobás [^1]'
- 'Alex Scott [^2]'
title: On a problem of Erdős and Moser
---
Introduction
============
Let $\mathcal H$ be an $r$-uniform hypergraph with vertex set $X$. We say that a set $A\subset X$ is [*covered in $\mathcal H$*]{} if there is $u\not\in A$ such that, for every $B\in A^{(r-1)}$ we have $B\cup\{u\}\in\mathcal H$; we say that [*$u$ covers $A$ (in $\mathcal H$)*]{}. Let $f(n,k,r)$ be the minimum number of edges in an $r$-uniform hypergraph $\mathcal H$ with vertex set $[n]=\{1,\dots,n\}$ such that every $k$-set in $[n]$ is covered in $\mathcal H$.
The problem of determining $f(n,k,r)$ for graphs ($r=2$) was raised by Erdős and Moser in [@EM64]. Subsequently, they proved in [@EM70] that, for $r=2$ and all $n>k$, $$f(n,k,2)= (k-1)(n-1) - \binom{k-1}{2} + \left\lceil\frac{n-k+1}{2}\right\rceil,$$ with a unique extremal graph. Our aim in this paper is to generalise this to larger values $r$: for fixed $k,r$ and sufficiently large $n$, we will determine the value of $f(n,k,r)$ and find the extremal graphs.
We begin with a construction giving an upper bound on $f(n,k,r)$. Let $D(n,r)$ be the minimum number $|\mathcal H|$ of edges in an $r$-uniform hypergraph $\mathcal H$ with vertex set $[n]$ such that every $(r-1)$-set is contained in some element of $\mathcal H$. It is clear that $D(n,r)\ge\binom{n}{r-1}/\binom{r}{r-1}$. In fact, this bound is close to optimal: for fixed $r$, we have $$D(n,r)=(1+o(1))\binom{n}{r-1}\bigg/\binom{r}{r-1}\sim n^{r-1}/r!.$$ This follows as a (very) special case of an important result of Rödl [@R85]. There is also a simple construction (pointed out to us by Noga Alon): for $c\in[n]$, consider the set $\{A\in[n]^{(r)}:\sum_{a\in A}a\equiv c\pmod n\}$. This covers all $(r-1)$-sets except those $B$ for which $c-\sum_{b\in B}\in B \pmod n$. There are only $O(n^{r-2})$ of these, so we can cover them one at a time.
Now for $n>k\ge r-1$, let $\mathcal G(n,k,r)$ be the family of $r$-uniform hypergraphs $\mathcal G$ on vertex set $[n]$ that can be constructed as follows:
- add all edges that meet any of the vertices $\{1,\dots,k-r+1\}$;
- on vertices $\{k-r+2,\dots,n\}$, we add a collection of $D(n-k+r-1,r)$ edges such that every $(r-1)$-set in $\{k-r+2,\dots,n\}$ is contained in at least one of these edges.
Let us check that for $\mathcal H\in \mathcal G(n,k,r)$, every $k$-set $B$ of vertices is covered in $\mathcal H$: if $[k-r+1]\not\subseteq B$ then any element $i$ of $[k-r+1]\setminus B$ covers $B$. Otherwise, $B\supseteq [k-r+1]$, so $B\setminus [k-r+1]$ has size $r-1$ and is therefore contained in some edge $C$ added in the second step of the construction: the unique element $u$ of $C\setminus B$ then covers $B$. We note that our construction generalizes that of Erdős and Moser: for $r=2$, $\mathcal G(n,k,r)$ consists of a unique graph up to isomorphism.
Let $g(n,k,r)$ be the number of edges in each element of $\mathcal G(n,k,r)$, so $$\begin{aligned}
g(n,k,r)
&=\binom{n}{r}-\binom{n-k+r-1}{r} + D(n-k+r-1,r)\label{gextremal}\\
&= (k-r+1+1/r+o(1))\frac{n^{r-1}}{(r-1)!}.\notag\end{aligned}$$ Furthermore, if there exists a Steiner system with parameters $(n-k+r-1,r,r-1)$ (in other words, a perfect covering of $(r-1)$-sets by $r$-sets) then $$\label{gexact}
g(n,k,r)=\binom{n}{r}-\binom{n-k+r-1}{r} + \binom{n-k+r-1}{r-1}/r.$$ By a recent major result of Keevash [@K14], such designs exist for infinitely many values of $n-k+r+1$, and so holds for infinitely many values of $n$.
The main result of this paper is to show that, for fixed $k,r$ and all sufficiently large $n$, the construction above is optimal (and that all hypergraphs of minimal size can be constructed in this way).
\[maintheorem\] For every $k,r$ there is an integer $n_0(k,r)$ such that for all $n>n_0$, $$f(n,k,r)=g(n,k,r).$$ Furthermore, if $\mathcal H$ is an $r$-uniform hypergraph with $n$ vertices and $f(n,k,r)$ edges in which every $k$-set of vertices is covered, then $\mathcal H$ is isomorphic to some element of $\mathcal G(n,k,r)$.
We note that Theorem \[maintheorem\] implies that, for $n>n_0(k,r)$, $$f(n,k,r)\ge\binom{n}{r}-\binom{n-k+r-1}{r} + \binom{n-k+r-1}{r-1}/r,$$ with equality for infinitely many values of $n$.
We will prove Theorem \[maintheorem\] in the next section; further discussion, and results for directed graphs, can be found in the final section. We use standard notation throughout: in particular, $[n]=\{1,\dots,n\}$, $X^{(r)}=\{A\subset X:|A|=r\}$ and, for a hypergraph $\mathcal H$, we write $|\mathcal H|$ for the number of edges in $\mathcal H$.
Covering hypergraphs
====================
The upper bound in Theorem \[maintheorem\] follows immediately from the construction given in the introduction. We will prove the lower bound by an induction on $r$, for which we will need two lemmas: the first lemma shows that, for fixed $k,r$ and large $n$, an extremal hypergraph must have $k-r+1$ vertices with degree close to the maximum possible; the second will allow us to show that if an extremal hypergraph has $k-r+1$ vertices of almost maximum possible degree then it must in fact belong to $\mathcal G(n,k,r)$. We will state and prove both lemmas, and then complete the proof of Theorem \[maintheorem\] at the end of the section.
Recall that if $\mathcal H$ is an $r$-uniform hypergraph then the [*shadow*]{} $\partial\mathcal H$ of $\mathcal H$ is the $(r-1)$-uniform hypergraph consisting of all $(r-1)$-sets that are contained in some edge of $\mathcal H$. We will need a version of the Kruskal-Katona Theorem ([@K63], [@K68]; see also [@B86], p. 30). It will be convenient to use it in the simplified form due to Lovász [@L79]: for $x\in[r,\infty)$, if $\mathcal H$ is an $r$-uniform hypergraph with $\binom xr$ edges, then $\partial \mathcal H$ has at least $\binom{x}{r-1}$ edges.
We can now state the first lemma. This will be used in our inductive argument, so if $r>2$ we will be able to assume that Theorem \[maintheorem\] holds for $r-1$.
\[lemmaa\] Let $k\ge r\ge 2$ be fixed, and if $r>2$ suppose that Theorem \[maintheorem\] holds with $r-1$ in place of $r$ (we do not assume anything if $r=2$). Let $\epsilon>0$ and let $n$ be sufficiently large (depending on $k,r,\epsilon$). Let $\mathcal H$ be an $r$-uniform hypergraph with $n$ vertices and $f(n,k,r)$ edges, and suppose that every $k$-set of vertices is covered in $\mathcal H$. Then $\mathcal H$ has $k-r+1$ vertices of degree at least $(1-\epsilon)\binom{n-1}{r-1}$.
Let $V$ and $E$ be the vertex and edge sets of $\mathcal H$ respectively, and write $m=|E|=f(n,k,r)$. Note that $m\le g(n,k,r)$, which by is at most $(k-r+1+1/r+o(1))n^{r-1}/(r-1)!=O(n^{r-1})$. Let $d_1\ge d_2\ge\dots\ge d_n$ be the degree sequence of $\mathcal H$, and suppose that $d_{k-r+1}<(1-\epsilon)\binom{n-1}{r-1}$. Define $\eta$ by $(1-\eta)^{r-1}=1-\epsilon$.
Let $v$ be a vertex of minimal degree in $\mathcal H$, and let $\mathcal H_v$ be the neighbourhood hypergraph of $v$, that is the $(r-1)$-uniform hypergraph with vertex set $V\setminus v$, and edge set $\{e\setminus v: \mbox{$v\in e$ and $e\in E$}\}$. Since every $k$-set is covered in $\mathcal H$, it follows that if $r\ge 3$ then every $(k-1)$-set is covered in $\mathcal H_v$ (for any $(k-1)$-set $A\subset V\setminus v$, the set $A\cup\{v\}$ is covered in $\mathcal H$ by some $u$; then $u$ covers $A$ in $\mathcal H_v$). Thus $\mathcal H_v$ has at least $f(n-1,k-1,r-1)$ edges. It follows by assumption that $f(n-1,k-1,r-1)=g(n-1,k-1,r-1)$ for sufficiently large $n$, and so $\mathcal H$ has minimal degree $$\begin{aligned}
\delta(\mathcal H)&\ge g(n-1,k-1,r-1)\notag\\
&\sim (k-r+1+1/(r-1)+o(1))\frac{n^{r-2}}{(r-2)!}.\label{deltabound}\end{aligned}$$ If $r=2$, we have directly that $\delta(\mathcal H)\ge k$ or else any $k$-set containing $v$ and all its neighbours is not covered in $\mathcal H$. So holds for all $r\ge 2$.
For $i=1,\dots,n$, define a real number $x_i\in[r-1,\infty)$ by $$\label{xdef}
d_i=\binom{x_i}{r-1},$$ so $x_1\ge\dots \ge x_n$. By the Kruskal-Katona Theorem, a vertex $v$ that covers $\binom{x}{r}$ $r$-sets must have degree at least $\binom{x}{r-1}$ (since $\mathcal H_v$ must contain all $(r-1)$sets in the shadow of the $r$-sets covered by $v$). So the $i$th vertex in $\mathcal H$ covers at most $\binom{x_i}{r}$ $r$-sets.
Each $r$-set $R$ in $V$ is covered at least $k-r+1$ times in $\mathcal H$, or else we could choose a $k$-set $S$ containing $R$ and all vertices that cover $R$, and then $S$ would not be covered in $\mathcal H$. Counting all pairs $(R,u)$ such that $R$ is an $r$-set and $u$ covers $R$, we see that $$\label{xbound}
\sum_{i=1}^n\binom{x_i}{r}\ge (k-r+1)\binom{n}{r}.$$ We have $x_1\le n-1$ and, as $d_{k-r+1}<(1-\epsilon)\binom{n-1}{r-1}$, we have from and the definition of $\eta$ that $$x_{k-r+1}\le(1-\eta+o(1))n.$$ Let $t=\lceil \log n\rceil^{r-1}$. Then, as $\sum_{i=1}^nd_i=rm$, we have $d_t\le rm/t=O(n^{r-1}/t)$ and so $$x_t=O(n/t^{1/(r-1)})=O(n/\log n).$$ Furthermore, for every $i$ we have $$\binom{x_i}{r}=\frac{x_i-r+1}{r}\binom{x_i}{r-1}=\frac{x_i-r+1}{r}d_i.$$ Since the sequence $(x_i)_{i=1}^n$ is decreasing, it follows that $$\begin{aligned}
%(k-r+1)\binom nr
\sum_{i=1}^{n}\binom{x_i}{r}
&= \sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{x_i-r+1}{r}d_i\\
&\le \frac{x_1-r+1}{r}\sum_{i=1}^{k-r}d_i+\frac{x_{k-r+1}-r+1}{r}\sum_{i=k-r+1}^{t-1}d_i
+\frac{x_t-r+1}{r}\sum_{i=t}^n d_i\\
&\le \frac{n-r}{r}\sum_{i=1}^{k-r}d_i+\frac{(1-\eta+o(1))n}{r}\sum_{i=k-r+1}^{t-1}d_i
+O(nm/\log n)\end{aligned}$$ Now $m=O(n^{r-1})$, so the last term is $o(n^r)$. Suppose $\sum_{i=1}^{k-r}d_i=\alpha\binom{n-1}{r-1}$ and $\sum_{i=k-r+1}^{t-1}d=\beta\binom{n-1}{r-1}$. Then by and the bound on $\sum_{i=1}^n\binom{x_i}{r}$ above we must have $$\begin{aligned}
(k-r+1)\binom nr
&\le \frac{n-r}{r}\alpha\binom{n-1}{r-1}+\frac{(1-\eta+o(1))n}{r}\beta\binom{n-1}{r-1}
+o(n^r)\\
&=\alpha\binom{n-1}{r}+(1-\eta+o(1))\beta\binom{n-1}{r}+o(n^r)\\
&=(\alpha+(1-\eta)\beta+o(1))\binom{n}{r},\end{aligned}$$ and so $\alpha+(1-\eta)\beta\ge k-r+1+o(1)$. However, $\alpha\le k-r$ (as $d_1\le\binom{n-1}{r-1}$) and so $\beta\ge1/(1-\eta)+o(1)$, giving $$\alpha+\beta\ge k-r+\frac{1}{1-\eta}+o(1)\ge k-r+1+\eta,$$ for large enough $n$. So $$\label{sum1}
\sum_{i=1}^{t-1}d_i \ge (k-r+1+\eta)\binom{n-1}{r-1}.$$ On the other hand, by , $$\begin{aligned}
\sum_{i=t}^nd_i
&\ge(1+o(1))n\delta(\mathcal H)\notag\\
&\ge\big(k-r+1+1/(r-1)+o(1)\big)\frac{n^{r-1}}{(r-2)!}\notag\\
&=\big((r-1)(k-r+1)+1\big)\frac{n^{r-1}}{(r-1)!} + o(n^{r-1}).\label{sum2}\end{aligned}$$ Since $\sum_{i=1}^n d_i=mr$, and imply that $$m\ge (k-r+1+1/r+\eta/r+o(1))\binom{n-1}{r-1},$$ which gives a contradiction for large enough $n$. We conclude that we must have $d_{k-r+1}\ge (1-\epsilon)\binom{n-1}{r-1}$ if $n$ is sufficiently large, which implies the result immediately.
Our second lemma will allow us to clean up the structure of a hypergraph that is close to extremal.
\[lemmab\] For every $r\ge2$ and $\lambda>0$ there is $\epsilon>0$ such that the following holds for all sufficiently large $n$. Let $\mathcal F$ and $\mathcal H$ be two hypergraphs with vertex set $[n]$ such that
- $\mathcal F$ is $(r-1)$-uniform and $|\mathcal F|<\epsilon n^{r-1}$;
- $\mathcal H$ is $r$-uniform;
- every $A\in[n]^{(r)}$ that contains an element of $\mathcal F$ is covered in $\mathcal H$.
Then there is an $r$-uniform hypergraph $\mathcal H'$ with vertex set $[n]$ such that
- $|\mathcal H'|+\lambda|\mathcal F|<|\mathcal H|$;
- $\partial\mathcal H' \supset \partial\mathcal H$.
The proof hinges on the fact that the presence of $\mathcal F$ forces $\mathcal H$ to cover many $r$-sets, and this in turn means that that $\mathcal H$ is not efficiently structured to have a large shadow (as some $(r-1)$ sets are contained in multiple elements of $\mathcal H$). We will obtain $\mathcal H'$ from $\mathcal H$ by deleting some edges, and possibly adding a smaller number of new edges to make sure that the shadow does not shrink.
We choose a large positive integer $M=M(r,\lambda)>0$ and then a small constant $\epsilon=\epsilon(M,r,\lambda)>0$. Let $m=|\mathcal F|$. Let us say that an ordered $(r+1)$-tuple $(x_1,\dots,x_{r-1},w,u)$ is [*good*]{} if $\{x_1,\dots,x_{r-1}\}\in\mathcal F$ and $u$ covers $\{x_1,\dots,x_{r-1},w\}$ in $\mathcal H$. Since there are $(r-1)!$ ways of ordering an element of $\mathcal F$, and $n-r+1$ choices for an additional vertex $w$ (with at least one choice of $u$ for each of these), there are $(r-1)!(n-r+1)m$ sequences $(x_1,\dots,x_{r-1},w)$ that extend to a good $(r+1)$-tuple of form $(x_1,\dots,x_{r-1},w,u)$.
Fix a partition $X_1\cup \dots \cup X_{r+1}$ of $[n]$, and let $\mathcal B_0$ be the set of good $(r+1)$-tuples $(a_1,\dots,a_{r+1})$ such that $a_i\in X_i$ for each $i$. Let $\mathcal A_0$ be the set of $r$-tuples $(a_1,\dots,a_r)$ such that $(a_1,\dots,a_{r+1})\in\mathcal B_0$ for some $a_{r+1}\in X_{r+1}$; and let $\mathcal F_0$ be the the set of $(r-1)$-tuples $(a_1,\dots,a_{r-1})$ such that $(a_1,\dots,a_r)\in \mathcal A_0$ for some $a_r\in X_r$. We will also describe this as follows: we consider $\mathcal B_0$ as a subset of the cartesian product $X_1\times\dots \times X_{r+1}$, and then $\mathcal F_0$ and $\mathcal A_0$ are the projections of $\mathcal B_0$ on to the first $r-1$ coordinates and the first $r$ coordinates respectively.
We choose $X_1,\dots,X_{r+1}$ so that $|\mathcal A_0|$ is as large as possible: by considering a random partition, we see that $$\label{bound0}
|\mathcal A_0|\ge (r-1)!(n-r+1)m/(r+1)^{r+1}.$$
For each $F=(a_1,\dots,a_{r-1})\in\mathcal F_0$, let $\alpha(F)$ be the number of distinct elements $u\in X_{r+1}$ such that $(a_1,\dots,a_{r-1},w,u)\in\mathcal B_0$ for some $w\in X_r$. Note that $\alpha(F)\ge1$ for all $F\in\mathcal F_0$.
Suppose first that $$\label{test1}
\sum_{F\in\mathcal F_0}\max\{\alpha(F)-1,0\}>\lambda m.$$ In this case we construct our set system $\mathcal H'$ as follows. For each $F=(a_1,\dots,a_{r-1})\in\mathcal F_0$ with $\alpha(F)>1$, we choose $\alpha(F)$ elements of $\mathcal B_0$ that have $F$ as an initial segment and contain distinct elements of $X_{r+1}$, say $$(a_1,\dots,a_{r-1},w_1,u_1),\dots,(a_1,\dots,a_{r-1},w_{\alpha(F)},u_{\alpha(F)})$$ (so the $u_i$ are distinct, but the $w_i$ may contain repetitions). We now delete from $\mathcal H$ the edges $$\{a_1,\dots,a_{r-1},u_1\},\dots,\{a_1,\dots,a_{r-1},u_{\alpha(F)-1}\};$$ these belong to $\mathcal H$ as $(a_1,\dots,a_r,w_i,u_i)$ is a good $(r+1)$-tuple for each $i$ and so $u_i$ covers $\{a_1,\dots,a_r,w_i\}$. Repeating for each $F\in\mathcal F_0$ with $\alpha(F)>1$, it follows from that we delete a total of more than $\lambda m$ edges from $\mathcal H$. Let $\mathcal H'$ be the resulting hypergraph. Clearly $|\mathcal H'|+\lambda|\mathcal F|<|\mathcal H|$, so it is enough to show that $\partial\mathcal H'=\partial\mathcal H$. Suppose that $I\in\partial\mathcal H$ (so $|I|=r-1$). If $I\not\in\partial H'$ then there must be an edge of form $A=\{a_1,\dots,a_{r-1},u_i\}$ that contains $I$ and that we deleted from $\mathcal H$. If $I=A\setminus a_j$ for some $j$, then $I\subset (A\setminus a_j)\cup\{w_i,u_i\}$, which belongs to $\mathcal H$ as $u_i$ covers $\{a_1,\dots,a_r,w_i\}$ and it was not one of the edges we deleted; otherwise $I=\{a_1,\dots,a_{r-1}\}$, and is contained in $\{a_1,\dots,a_{r-1},u_{\alpha(F)}\}$, which we did not delete from $\mathcal H$. We conclude that $\partial\mathcal H'=\partial\mathcal H$.
We may therefore assume that does not hold. It follows that there are at most $\lambda m/M$ elements $F=(a_1,\dots,a_{r-1})\in\mathcal F_0$ with $\alpha(F)\ge M+1$. Let $\mathcal F_1=\{F\in\mathcal F_0: \alpha(F)\le M\}$, and let $\mathcal A_1$ be the set of elements $(a_1,\dots,a_{r-1},w)\in\mathcal A_0$ such that $(a_1,\dots,a_{r-1})\in\mathcal F_1$. Since each $F\in\mathcal F_0$ extends to at most $n-r+1$ elements of $\mathcal A_0$, it follows from that for all sufficiently large $n$ $$|\mathcal A_1| \ge (r-1)!(n-r+1)m/(r+1)^{r+1} - (n-r+1)(\lambda m/M)\ge mn/M,$$ provided $M$ is large enough.
For each $F=(a_1,\dots,a_{r-1})\in\mathcal F_1$, define $$\beta(F)=\max_{u\in X_{r+1}}|\{w\in X_r: (a_1,\dots,a_{r-1},w,u)\in\mathcal B_0\}|,$$ and choose $u_F\in X_{r+1}$ such that there are $\beta(F)$ elements $w\in X_r$ such that $(a_1,\dots,a_{r-1},w,u_F)\in\mathcal B_0$. Each $F\in\mathcal F_1$ extends to at most $\alpha(F)\beta(F)$ elements of $\mathcal B_0$, and so $F$ extends to at most $\alpha(F)\beta(F)$ elements of $\mathcal A_1$. Therefore $$|\mathcal A_1|\le \sum_{F\in\mathcal F_1}\alpha(F)\beta(F)\le M\sum_{F\in\mathcal F_1}\beta(F),$$ and so $\sum_{F\in\mathcal F_1}\beta(F)\ge mn/M^2$.
Let $\mathcal F_2=\{F\in\mathcal F_1:\beta(F)\ge n/2M^2\}$. So for each $F=(a_1,\dots,a_{r-1})\in\mathcal F_2$ we have chosen $u_F\in X_{r+1}$ such that there are at least $n/2M^2$ elements of $\mathcal B_0$ of form $(a_1,\dots,a_{r-1},w,u_F)$ with $w\in X_r$. By counting the number of ways of extending elements from $\mathcal F_1$ to $\mathcal A_1$, we see that $$|\mathcal A_1|\le (n-r+1)|\mathcal F_2| + (n/2M^2)|\mathcal F_1\setminus\mathcal F_2|\le n|\mathcal F_2|+mn/2M^2.$$ Since $|\mathcal A_1|\ge mn/M$, this implies that $|\mathcal F_2|\ge m/2M^2$.
Now $\mathcal F_2$ is a subset of $X_1\times\dots\times X_{r-1}$. For $i=1,\dots,r-1$, let $\mathcal P_i$ be the projection of $\mathcal F_2$ onto the coordinates other than $i$, so $\mathcal P_i\subset \prod_{j\in [r-1]\setminus i} X_j$. It follows from the Loomis-Whitney Inequality [@LW49] (see also [@BT95]) that $$\prod_{i=1}^{r-1}|\mathcal P_i| \ge |\mathcal F_2|^{r-2},$$ and so in particular there is some $i$ such that $$|\mathcal P_i|\ge |\mathcal F_2|^{(r-2)/(r-1)} \ge (m/2M^2)^{(r-2)/(r-1)} >5 M^2 \lambda m/n,$$ as $m\le\epsilon n^{r-1}$ by assumption and we may also assume $\epsilon<1/ (10\lambda M^4)^r$.
Without loss of generality, we may assume that $i=r-1$. Let $\mathcal P=\mathcal P_{r-1}$. For each element of $P=(a_1,\dots,a_{r-2})\in\mathcal P$, choose an element $F\in\mathcal F_2$ that projects to $P$. Let $\mathcal F_3$ be the collection of $|\mathcal P|$ elements of $\mathcal F_2$ that are chosen. Thus the elements of $\mathcal F_3$ have pairwise distinct projections on to the first $r-2$ coordinates.
We are finally ready to construct our modification of $\mathcal H$. For $F=(a_1,\dots,a_{r-1})\in \mathcal F_3$, let $W_F=\{w\in X_r:(a_1,\dots,a_{r-1},w,u_F)\in \mathcal B_0\}$, say $W_F=\{w_1,\dots,w_t\}$. Since $F\in\mathcal F_3\subset\mathcal F_2$, we have $t\ge n/2M^2$; if $t$ is odd, we reduce it by one (and do not use the final element of $W_F$). Now delete from $\mathcal H$ the edges $$\label{deleting}
\{a_1,\dots,a_{r-2},w_1,u_F\},\dots,\{a_1,\dots,a_{r-2},w_t,u_F\}$$ and add (if not already present) new edges $$\{a_1,\dots,a_{r-2},w_1,w_2\}, \{a_1,\dots,a_{r-2},w_3,w_4\}, \dots, \{a_1,\dots,a_{r-2},w_{t-1},w_t\}.$$ Thus we decrease the number of edges by at least $t/2\ge n/5M^2$. Repeating for every $F\in \mathcal F_3$, we decrease the number of edges by at least $|\mathcal F_3|(n/5M^2)> (5M^2\lambda m/n)(n/5M^2)=\lambda m$ (note that we delete disjoint sets of edges for distinct $F,F'\in\mathcal F_3$, as $F$ and $F'$ extend distinct elements of $\mathcal P$ and so have distinct projections on to the first $r-2$ coordinates). Let $\mathcal H'$ be the resulting hypergraph.
All that remains is to check that $\partial H\subset \partial H'$. Given $I\in\partial H\setminus \partial H'$, we know that $I$ must be contained in one of the edges we deleted. So suppose without loss of generality that $I\subset \{a_1,\dots,a_{r-2},w_1,u_F\}$ in . Since $u_F$ covers $\{a_1,\dots,a_{r-1},w_1\}$ in $\mathcal H$ we cannot have $u_F\in I$, as then $I\cup \{a_{r-1}\}$ is an edge of both $\mathcal H$ and $\mathcal H'$. But then $I\subset \{a_1,\dots,a_{r-2},w_1,w_2\}\in\mathcal H'$. This gives a contradiction and proves the lemma.
We can now complete the proof of our main theorem.
We prove the theorem by induction on $r$. The case $r=2$ is immediate from the Erdős-Moser theorem, so we may assume that $r\ge3$ and we have proved smaller cases.
We first note that, since Theorem \[maintheorem\] holds for $r-1$, it follows that Lemma \[lemmaa\] holds for $r$. Let $\mathcal H$ be a hypergraph with $n$ vertices and $f(n,k,r)$ edges in which every $k$-set is covered. Let $v_1,\dots,v_n$ be the vertices of $\mathcal H$ in decreasing order of degree, let $V=\{v_1,\dots,v_n\}$, and let $A=\{v_1,\dots,v_{k-r+1}\}$. Let $\mathcal H_1$ be the restriction of $\mathcal H$ to $V\setminus A$.
Let $\mathcal G\subset V^{(r)}$ be the collection of all $r$-sets of vertices that meet $A$ but are not present in $\mathcal H$, and suppose $\mathcal G$ is nonempty. It follows from Lemma \[lemmaa\] that, for any $\epsilon>0$, if $n$ is sufficiently large then $|\mathcal G|<\epsilon n^{r-1}$.
We split $\mathcal G$ into sets $\mathcal G_0,\dots,\mathcal G_{r-1}$, where $\mathcal G_i=\{G\in\mathcal G:|G\setminus A|=i\}$. Let $\mathcal G_i$ be the largest of these sets, and let $\mathcal G^*_i=\{G\setminus A:G\in G_i\}$. Let $\phi:(V\setminus A)^{(i)}\to (V\setminus A)^{(r-1)}$ be an injection such that $\phi(S)\supset S$ for every $S$ (the existence of such a mapping follows easily from Hall’s Theorem) and let $\mathcal F=\{\phi(S):S\in\mathcal G_i^*\}$. Note that $|\mathcal G_i|\ge|\mathcal G|/r$ and for each $B\in\mathcal G_i^*$ there are at most $k^r$ sets $G\in\mathcal G_i$ with $G\setminus A=B$. Thus $\mathcal F$ is a collection of $(r-1)$-sets in $V\setminus A$, such that $|\mathcal F|\ge|\mathcal G|/k^rr$ and every set in $\mathcal F$ contains $G\setminus A$ for some $G\in \mathcal G$.
Now for any $F\in \mathcal F$, we can pick $G\in\mathcal G$ such that $G\setminus A\subset F$ and choose $v\in A\cap G$. For any $w\in V\setminus (F\cup A)$, the set $(A\setminus v) \cup F\cup \{w\}$ has size $k$ and so must be covered in $\mathcal H$ by some $u$. We do not have $u=v$, as $G$ is not an edge of $\mathcal H$. Thus $u\not\in A$: it follows that $F\cup \{w\}$ is covered by $u$ in $\mathcal H_1$.
We can now apply Lemma \[lemmab\] to the hypergraphs $\mathcal F$ and $\mathcal H_1$ (both on vertex set $V\setminus A$) with $\lambda=k^rr$ to deduce that there is some $\mathcal H_1'$ such that $|\mathcal H_1'|+k^rr|\mathcal F|<|\mathcal H_1|$ and $\partial H_1'\supset\partial H_1$. Let $\mathcal H'$ be the hypergraph with vertex set $V$ obtained from $\mathcal H_1'$ by adding all $r$-sets incident with $A$. Then $|\mathcal H'|<|\mathcal H|$, as $k^rr|\mathcal F|\ge|\mathcal G|$.
Finally, we claim that every $k$-set in $V$ is covered in $\mathcal H'$. Let $B\in V^{(k)}$. If $A\setminus B$ is nonempty, then any vertex of $A\setminus B$ covers $B$ in $\mathcal H'$. Otherwise, $A \subset B$: let $C=B\setminus A$, so $C$ is an $(r-1)$-set. There must be some $u\not\in B$ that covers $B$ in $\mathcal H$, and so $\{u\}\cup C\in\mathcal H$. Then we also have $\{u\}\cup C\in\mathcal H_1$, and so $C\in\partial \mathcal H_1$. By construction, we also have $C\in\partial\mathcal H_1'$, so there is some $r$-set $D\in \mathcal H_1'$ that contains $C$. Let $u'$ be the single element of $D\setminus C$: then $u'$ covers $B$ in $\mathcal H'$, as $D\in\mathcal H'$, and every other $r$-set contained in $\{u'\}\cup B$ meets $A$ and so belongs to $\mathcal H'$. This gives a contradiction, as $|\mathcal H'|<|\mathcal H|$, and every $k$-set is covered in $\mathcal H'$.
We conclude that every edge incident with $A$ must be present in $\mathcal H$. But now consider any $(r-1)$-set $B\subset V\setminus A$: arguing as above, the set $A\cup B$ must be covered by some $u$ in $\mathcal H$, and so $B\cup \{u\}\in\mathcal H_1$. It follows that $\partial\mathcal H_1=(V\setminus A)^{(r-1)}$, and so $|\mathcal H_1|\ge D(n-|A|,r) = D(n-k+r-1,r)$. Thus $f(n,k,r)=|\mathcal H|\ge g(n,k,r)$. Furthermore, since $\mathcal H$ contains all $r$-sets meeting $A$, and a collection of $D(n-k+r-1,r)$ $r$-sets in $V\setminus A$ containing all $(r-1)$-sets in $V\setminus A$ in their shadow, we see that $\mathcal H\in\mathcal G(n,k,r)$.
Further directions
==================
There are a number of interesting related problems. In their original paper [@EM64], Erdős and Moser raised the question of covering oriented graphs. A digraph with at least $k+1$ vertices has [*property $S_k$*]{} (named after Schütte) if for every $k$-set $B$ of vertices there is a vertex $u$ such that $B$ is contained in the outneighbourhood of $u$. Erdős and Moser [@EM64] asked the following.
\[orientedproblem\] What is the minimum number $F(n,k)$ of edges in a graph $G$ of order $n$ that has an orientation with property $S_k$?
Erdős and Moser [@EM70] noted that, for fixed $k$ and large enough $n$, $f(k-1)n\le F(n,k) \le f(k)n$, where $f(k)$ is the minimum number of vertices in an oriented graph with property $S_k$; it is known that $f(k)=2^{(1+o(1))k}$.
For $k\ge 2$, let $\delta(k)$ be the smallest positive integer $\delta$ such that some oriented graph with property $S_k$ has a vertex with indegree $\delta$. We shall show that the asymptotic behaviour of $F(n,k)$ depends primarily on $\delta(k)$.
For every $k\ge 2$ there is are integers $c=c(k)$ and $n_0=n_0(k)$ such that $F(n,k)=\delta(k)n+c$ for all $n\ge n_0$.
Note first that if $G$ is an oriented graph with $t$ vertices that has property $S_k$ and $v$ is any vertex of $G$ then we can generate another oriented graph with property $S_k$ by adding a new vertex $v'$ with no outedges, and the same inneighbourhood as $v$. If $G$ has a vertex with indegree $\delta(k)$ then applying this construction repeatedly to a vertex of minimal indegree gives, for all $n\ge t$ and some $c_1=c_1(G)$, oriented graphs with $n$ vertices, $\delta(k)n+c_1$ edges and property $S_k$.
Any oriented graph $G$ with property $S_k$ must have at least $\delta(k)|V(G)|$ edges, and so we must have $\delta(k)n\le F(k,n)\le\delta(k)n+c_1$ for all sufficiently large $n$. Let $c\ge0$ be minimal such that there are infinitely many graphs $G$ with $\delta(k)|V(G)|+c$ edges and property $S_k$: if $|V(G)|$ is large enough and $G$ has $\delta(k)|V(G)|+c$ edges then it has minimal degree at most $\delta(k)$, so we can apply the construction to generate a sequence of oriented graphs with $\delta(k)n+c$ edges and property $S_k$ for all sufficiently large $n$. If $n$ is large enough, these are extremal.
The covering problem is also natural for the more general class of digraphs (so we allow edges in both directions). In this case, we can solve the problem completely.
Let $\mathcal A(n,k)$ be the family of digraphs on vertex set $[n]$ that can be constructed as follows:
- Add all $k(k+1)$ directed edges that join any two elements from $[k+1]$
- For each $i>k+1$, add edges from exactly $k$ elements of $[k+1]$ to $i$.
If $G \in\mathcal A(n,k)$ then every vertex of $G$ has indegree exactly $k$. Let us check that every $k$-set $B$ is covered in $G$. If an element $i\in [k+1]$ does not cover $B$ then either $i\in B$, or $i\not \in B$ and some vertex of $B$ is not an outneighbour of $i$. There are $|B\cap[k+1]|$ elements of the first type and at most $|B\setminus [k+1]|$ elements of the second type (as each element of $B\setminus[k+1]$ has edges from all but one element of $[k+1]$); so there is at least one element of $[k+1]$ left over to cover $B$.
Let $k\ge2$, and let $D$ be a digraph of order $n$ that has property $S_k$. Then $D$ has at least $kn$ edges, and if $D$ has exactly $kn$ edges then $D$ is isomorphic to some element of $\mathcal A(n,k)$.
Every vertex has indegree at least $k$, or else any $k$-set that contains a vertex of minimal indegree and all its inneighbours is not covered. Thus $D$ has at least $kn$ edges.
If $D$ has exactly $kn$ edges then every vertex has indegree exactly $k$. Given a vertex $v$, let $\Gamma^-(v)$ be the set of inneighbours of $v$. For any $w\in\Gamma^-(v)$, the only vertex that can cover $\{v\}\cup \Gamma^-(v)\setminus w$ is $w$ (as it is the only inneighbour of $v$ outside the set). It follows that $\Gamma^-(v)$ induces a complete directed graph. Now pick any $u\in\Gamma^-(v)$: we have $|\Gamma^-(u)\cap\Gamma^-(v)|=|\Gamma^-(v)\setminus u|=k-1$. Let $A=\Gamma^-(u)\cup\Gamma^-(v)$, so $|A|=k+1$ and every pair of elements from $A$ is joined in both directions except possibly $u,u'$, where $u'$ is the unique element of $\Gamma^-(u)\setminus\Gamma^-(v)$. Since $k\ge2$, we have $|A|\ge3$ and so we can pick $w\ne u,u'$ in $A$: then $\Gamma^-(w)=A\setminus w$ induces a complete directed graph, and so $u,u'$ are also joined in both directions. Thus $A$ is complete and, as $|A|=k+1$, no further edges can enter $A$.
Finally, for any $x\not\in A$ and any $a,b\in A$, consider the $k$-set $\{x\}\cup A\setminus\{a,b\}$: this can only be covered by $a$ or $b$, and so one of $a$ and $b$ must send an edge to $x$. Since this holds for every pair of elements in $A$, it follows that $k$ elements of $A$ must direct edges to $x$. We conclude that $D\in\mathcal A(n,k)$.
Erdős and Moser [@EM70] also considered a generalization of the graph problem, where every vertex must be covered by many other vertices. Let $h(n,k,r,s)$ be the minimum number of edges in an $r$-uniform hypergraph $\mathcal H$ with vertex set $[n]$ such that every $k$-set in $[n]$ is covered by at least $s$ distinct vertices in $\mathcal H$ (so $h(n,k,r,1)=f(n,k,r)$). Erdős and Moser [@EM70] considered the case $r=2$ and noted that, for $n>n_0(k,s)$, $$\label{sis2}
h(n,k,2,s)=f(n,k+s-1,2);$$ they further noted that this equality does not hold for every $n,k,s$ (so the assumption that $n>n_0$ is necessary). It seems likely that our methods should be useful for this problem, although we note that does not hold when 2 is replaced by $r$ if $k$ is close to $r$: for instance with $k=r=3$ and $s=3$ the graph $\mathcal G(n,k+s-1,r)=\mathcal G(n,5,3)$ has $3$ vertices of large degree, but is not extremal as the edge containing these three vertices can be removed.
In a similar vein, we can consider a multicolour version of the problem: let $b(n,k,r,c)$ be the minimum number of edges in a graph on $n$ vertices, in which the edges are partitioned into $c$ classes such that every $k$-set is covered by the edges in each class. How does $b(n,k,r,c)$ behave for fixed $k,r,c$ and large $n$?
[**Acknowledgement.**]{} The authors would like to thank Noga Alon for his helpful comments, and the referee for a careful reading.
[99]{}
B. Bollobás and A. Thomason, Projections of bodies and hereditary properties of hypergraphs, [*Bull. London Math. Soc.*]{} [**27**]{} (1995), 417–424.
B. Bollobás, Combinatorics, Cambridge University Press (1986).
P. Erdős and L. Moser, A problem on tournaments, [*Canad. Math. Bull.*]{} [**7**]{} (1964), 351–356.
P. Erdős and L. Moser, An extremal problem in graph theory, [*J. Aust. Math. Soc.*]{} [**11**]{} (1970), 42–47.
P. Keevash, The existence of designs, [*preprint*]{}, arXiv:1401.3665.
G.O.H. Katona, A theorem of finite sets, [*in*]{} Theory of Graphs, P. Erdős, and G.O.H. Katona (eds), Akadémiai Kiadó and Academic Press (1968), 187–207.
J.B. Kruskal, The number of simplices in a complex, [*in*]{} Mathematical Optimization Techniques, R. Bellman (ed), University of California Press (1963), 251–278.
L.H. Loomis and H. Whitney, An inequality related to the isoperimetric inequality, [*Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.*]{} [**55**]{} (1949), 961–962.
L. Lovász, Combinatorial Problems and Exercises, 13.31, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1979).
V. Rödl, On a Packing and Covering Problem, [*European Journal of Combinatorics*]{} [**6**]{} (1985), 69–78.
[^1]: Department of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WB, UK; [*and*]{} Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis TN38152, USA; [*and*]{} London Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 35a South St, Mayfair, London W1K 2XF, UK; email: [email protected]. Research supported in part by NSF grant ITR 0225610; and by MULTIPLEX no. 317532.
[^2]: Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Andrew Wiles Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK; email: [email protected].
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We present measurements of element abundance ratios and dust in absorbers identified in SDSS DR7+DR9. In an earlier paper we formed a statistical sample of 435 absorbers and postulated that their statistical properties might be representative of at least two populations of absorbers. Here we show that if the absorbers are roughly divided into two subsamples with rest equivalent widths larger and smaller than $W_0^{\lambda 3934} = 0.7$ Å, they are then representative of two physically different populations. Comparisons of abundance ratios between the two absorber populations indicate that the weaker $W_0^{\lambda 3934}$ absorbers have properties consistent with halo-type gas, while the stronger absorbers have properties intermediate between halo- and disk-type gas. We also show that, on average, the dust extinction properties of the overall sample is consistent with a LMC or SMC dust law, and the stronger absorbers are nearly 6 times more reddened than their weaker counterparts. The absorbed-to-unabsorbed composite flux ratio at $\lambda_{rest} = 2200$ Å is $\mathcal{R} \approx 0.73$ and $E(B-V) \approx 0.046$ for the stronger absorbers ($W_0^{\lambda 3934} \ge 0.7$ Å), and $\mathcal{R} \approx 0.95$ and $E(B-V) \approx 0.011$ for the weaker absorbers ($W_0^{\lambda 3934} < 0.7$ Å).'
author:
- |
\
$^{1}$Department of Physics and Astronomy and PITTsburgh Particle physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC),\
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260\
bibliography:
- 'ReferencesPaper2.bib'
nocite: '[@*]'
title: ' Absorbers in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Element Abundances and Dust'
---
\[firstpage\]
galaxies: individual: catalogs - quasars: absorption lines
Introduction {#intro}
============
Determination of element abundances, dust properties, and the overall chemical histories of the gaseous environments of galaxies is needed for an improved understanding of galaxy formation and evolution. The gaseous environments of galaxies include their interstellar medium (ISM) as well as surrounding circumgalactic medium and intergalactic medium (CGM and IGM). A broad goal is to constrain how galaxies convert their gas into stars, and the feedback (outflow) mechanisms that are at play in polluting the gas surrounding galaxies in the context of the observed galaxy stellar populations. Here we consider what can be learned from a study of the properties of intervening gas giving rise to absorption seen in the spectra of background quasars. The statistics of these absorbers, as derived from an analysis of SDSS quasar spectroscopy, were recently presented in Sardane, Turnshek & Rao (2014; hereafter Paper I). Some of the properties of galaxies associated with them, derived from SDSS images, will be presented in Sardane, Turnshek & Rao (2015; hereafter Paper III). In this contribution (Paper II in the series), we use SDSS spectroscopy to constrain results on relative element abundances and dust in absorbers.
Quasar absorption line (QAL) spectroscopy is a unique probe of the evolution of galaxies and their gaseous components, from the coolest molecular clouds to the hotter ionized gaseous halos (Foltz et al. 1988; Lu et al. 1996; Ledoux et al. 1998; Wolfe & Prochaska 2000a; Petitjean et al. 2000; Ledoux, Srianand & Petitjean 2002; Ledoux, Petitjean, & Srianand 2002; Cui et al. 2005; Srianand et al. 2005; Petitjean et al. 2006; Fox et al. 2007; Tripp et al. 2008; Tom & Chen 2008; Noterdaeme et al. 2008; 2010; Prochaska et al. 2011; Tumlinson et al. 2011a; Crighton et al. 2013; Stocke et al. 2014; Lehner et al. 2014; Savage et al. 2014). Due to the rest-frame UV location of the resonance transitions most relevant for QAL studies, such studies have traditionally concentrated on probing the gaseous absorbers and their environments at high redshifts. As a result, the paucity of identified gaseous structures at very low redshift naturally creates a gap in our understanding of how galaxies and their gaseous environments evolve from high redshift to the present. Moreover, cosmological dimming, which reduces the surface brightness of astronomical sources by $(1+z)^4$, makes it more difficult to identify and characterize the galaxies that could host the absorbers at high redshift.
One rare class of QAL system that is not as well studied and understood as others is the one identified using the resonance doublet transition of singly ionized calcium: $\lambda\lambda 3934, 3969$. However, although its incidence makes it rare, the advantage of studying the QAL doublet is that it can be observed from $z\sim 1.4$ all the way down to the present epoch using the large number of optical ground-based quasar spectra obtained by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) (Schneider et al. 2010; Ahn et al. 2012).
Recently, we harnessed the statistical power of the SDSS to assemble the largest catalog of these rare absorbers (Paper I). This search, which utilized $\sim 95,000$ quasar sightlines from the Seventh (DR7) and Ninth (DR9) data releases of the SDSS, resulted in the compilation of 435 absorbers. As described in Paper I, the detections were based on $\geq5$$\sigma$ and $\geq2.5$$\sigma$ rest equivalent width significance threshholds for the strong and weak members of the doublet, respectively. A constraint on the doublet ratio was also employed to remove “unphysical” profiles, as dictated by the theoretical ratio of the doublet oscillator strengths.
In Paper I we demonstrated that after accounting for sensitivity corrections, a single power-law fit is insufficient to describe the $\lambda \mathrm{3934}$ rest equivalent width, $W_0^{\lambda3934}$, distribution. More specifically, a two-component exponential distribution is required to fit the data satisfactorily. This result is somewhat surprising based on analysis of much larger samples of more ubiquitous QAL systems such as (e.g., Nestor, Turnshek & Rao et al. 2005, Seyffert et al. 2013, and Zhu & Menard 2013) and (Cooksey et al. 2013). For these QAL systems, a single exponential function suffices to characterize their $\mathrm{W_0}$ distributions at $\mathrm{W_0~\gtrsim 0.1~\AA}$. For absorbers the need for a two-component distribution persists across all observed redshifts, which is strong statistical evidence for *at least* two distinct populations.
A preliminary investigation of the nature of the two-component fit suggested that there was a bimodality in the distribution of -to- ratios (i.e., $\mathrm{W_0^{\lambda2796}/{W_0^{\lambda3934}}}$) with a separation above and below $W_0^{\lambda3934} \sim 0.7$ Å. However, there was no evidence that the doublet ratio, which is an indicator of saturation, could be used to distinguish between the two absorber populations.
Using the statistical sample from Paper I, this work will explore the chemical abundances and dust-extinction properties of the absorbers. In particular, we will exploit the power of spectral stacking to form various composite spectra which will be analyzed to infer chemical abundance ratios and dust-extinction properties for various subsamples. This will allow us to characterize and distinguish between two different absorber populations as implied by their statistical properties.
The paper is organized as follows. In §2 we give a brief description of our SDSS absorber catalog that was presented in Paper I. In §3 we discuss notable individual systems in the catalog. In §4 we derive the composite properties of the absorber full sample and subsamples in the context of their element abundance ratios and dust-extinction properties. We then discuss the implications of these results and how they explain the existence of two different populations of absorbers in §5. In §6 we summarize our results and conclusions.
The SDSS Absorber Catalog {#data}
==========================
The sample of absorbers used in this analysis is derived from our Paper I catalog. It consists of 435 absorbers with $W_0^{\lambda3934} \geq 0.16 \mathrm{~\AA}$, compiled using over 95,000 quasar spectra with SDSS magnitudes $i < 20$ from the SDSS data releases DR7 (Abazajian et al. 2009; Schneider et al. 2010) and DR9 (Ahn et al. 2012; Pâris et al. 2012). Data from DR7 and DR9 were obtained using two nearly identical spectrographs, the SDSS spectrograph and the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) spectrograph, respectively. The BOSS spectrograph (Smee et al. 2013), which was designed to target higher-redshift quasars for the BOSS project (Schlegel et al. 2007; Dawson et al. 2013), is an improved version of the SDSS spectrograph. The SDSS spectrograph covers the wavelength range of $\mathrm{3800 - 9200~\AA}$, while the BOSS spectrograph has extended wavelength coverage in both the blue and the near-infrared, and covers $\mathrm{3600 - 10,400~\AA}$. The resolutions of both spectrographs are essentially the same, ranging from $\sim1500$ at $3800~\mathrm{\AA}$ to $\sim2500$ at $9000~\mathrm{\AA}$. To identify the absorbers, splines and Gaussians were used to fit a quasar spectrum’s so-called pseudo-continuum, which consists of the “true” continuum plus the broad emission lines. As indicated previously, the absorbers were selected based on $5\sigma$ and $2.5\sigma$ significance thresholds for the $\lambda3934$ and $\lambda3969$ lines, respectively, and a doublet ratio (DR)[^1] constraint of $\mathrm{1 \leq DR \leq 2}$ to within the measurement errors, which is the range of physically-allowable doublet ratios between saturated (DR = 1) and completely unsaturated (DR = 2) absorption lines.
Properties of Some Individual Absorbers in the Catalog
=======================================================
In the limit of an absorption line in the optically thin regime, the optical depth is independent of the Doppler parameter, so a measurement of its equivalent width translates reliably into a column density measurement. Hence, for weak, unsaturated resonance transitions at rest-frame wavelength, $\lambda_0$, and oscillator strength, $f$, the column density, $N$, is approximately a linear function of the rest equivalent width, $W_0$,
$$N \approx 1.13 \times 10^{20}~\frac{W_0}{\lambda_0^{2} f}
\label{linearCOG}$$
where $N$ is in atoms cm$^{-2}$ and $W_0$ and $\lambda_0$ are in Å (Draine 2011).
In QAL studies of high-N() systems, which generally applies to the absorbers, it is common to use this relation to derive total element column densities from weak, low-ionization, unsaturated lines due to, e.g., , , , and . Self-shielding generally ensures that the low-ionization metallic elements will be the dominant ionization state. Therefore, we will employ this method to infer some of the properties of individual absorbers, and we will also take advantage of this in the §4 analysis using composite spectra. These assumptions are theoretically justified, and departures should be small for the elements we consider (e.g., Viegas 1995; Vladilo et al. 2001; Prochaska & Wolfe 2002). In cases where there is evidence for a non-negligible degree of saturation, we will report lower limits on derived column densities.
Under these assumptions, we derive abundance ratios of special sightlines that have high enough redshift and signal-to-noise ratios to permit spectral coverage and reliable measurements of interesting weak absorption features. In keeping with standard practice, the reported abundance ratios are relative to solar (Asplund et al. 2009), i.e., the abundance ratio of element X relative to element Y will be given relative to solar values:
$$[X/Y] \equiv \log[N(X)/N(Y)] - \log[N(X)/N(Y)]_{\astrosun}$$
For absorbers with $z_{abs} \gtrsim 0.9$, the UV - rest-frame region of the spectrum falls into the SDSS optical wavelength window. The sample consists of $\sim 70$ systems with $z_{abs} \gtrsim 0.9$. However, due to increasingly poor signal-to-noise ratios in the blue region of many SDSS spectra, and the unfortunate blending of the - region with Ly$\alpha$ forest lines or other unrelated metal lines, the useful sample where - can be studied in absorbers is reduced to a dozen systems. Since zinc is only mildly refractory, its abundance ratio relative to more strongly depleted elements such as chromium, titanium, and iron is of primary importance for characterizing the depletion properties of the gas.
The - region has a rest-frame wavelength interval $\mathrm{2026-2066~\AA}$. For the usable spectra we infer the column densities of Cr and Zn from four transitions and two transitions. The first of these is a feature at $\lambda$2026 which is a blend due to three transitions: a line, a weak line, and a very weak line. Another feature at $\lambda$2062 is a blend of and . The two additional transitions for are at $\lambda2056$ and $\lambda2066$.
Deblending the features in the - region at SDSS resolution can be done by making use of known oscillator strength ratios for an element’s ionic transition. For example, for the feature at $\lambda2026$ the equivalent widths of $\lambda2026$ and $\lambda2026$ were taken to be 32 and 23 times smaller than the observed equivalent widths of the unblended $\lambda2852$ and $\lambda2056$ lines, resepctively. The remaining absorption can then be attributed to $\lambda2026$.[^2] Generally, since the oscillator strength of $\lambda2026$ is quite small relative to $\lambda2026$, its contribution to the $\lambda2026$ feature is negligible.
Similarly, the feature at $\lambda2062$ due to and can be deblended by taking the $\lambda2062$ equivalent width to be half of the sum of the $\lambda2056$ and $\lambda2066$ equivalent widths, with the remainder due to $\lambda2062$. The corresponding errors are then propagated in quadrature. The reported column densities are the error-weighted average values inferred from each transition. The results on the column densities for Zn$^+$, Cr$^+$, Fe$^+$ and Mn$^+$ are summarized in Table \[TableFive\], where the column density for Fe$^+$ is inferred from the weak lines of $\lambda\lambda2249,2260$ and the column density for Mn$^+$ is inferred from the weak lines of $\lambda\lambda\lambda2576,2594,2606$. For the absorbers in Table \[TableFive\], Figure \[PlotIndividual\] shows the abundance ratios \[X/Zn\], where X = \[Cr, Fe, Mn\], as filled circles versus $W_0^{\lambda 3934}$. Cr, Fe, and Mn are known to be highly refractory, while Zn is not. Hence, an indication of the degree of depletion of Cr, Fe, and Mn onto dust grains can be inferred from these abundance ratios. Results from previous investigations of absorbers (open symbols) known to be damped Ly$\alpha$ absorbers (DLAs) and subDLAs at $z\sim1$ are also included in Figure \[PlotIndividual\] for comparison. These data are due to Nestor et al. (2003), Wild et al. (2006)[^3], and the Zych et al. (2009) VLT/UVES and Keck/HIRESb datasets. Consistent with previous results, these refractory elements are all seen to be depleted relative to Zn. While the depletion levels are fairly typical, nucleosynthetic processes can yield departures of $-0.3$ to $-0.1$ in \[Fe/Zn\] (Prochaska & Wolfe 2002). The depletion levels are seen to vary over a range of values, suggestive of a significant range in dust-to-gas ratios in these sightlines and/or environments.
Although a large scatter is present, the results suggest that depletion increases with increasing $W_0^{\lambda3934}$, which is generally consistent with previous findings.
The $\lambda\lambda$5891,5897 absorption transitions can be observed with the SDSS spectrograph for absorbers with $z_{abs} \lesssim 0.6$. With the BOSS spectrograph the coverage is extended to $z_{abs} \lesssim 0.7$. For absorbers in the catalog, measurements of are possible for 213 systems. However, due to signal-to-noise limitations, which is particularly severe for many of the lines since they occur close to the red limit of SDSS/BOSS spectra, only $31$ absorbers had $\geq 2\sigma$ detections. The results are summarized in Table \[TableSix\]. However, based on the observed doublet ratios, 23 of the measurements indicate some degree of saturation, and so most of the results are given as lower limits on Na$^+$ column densities. For the remaining eight, Eq. \[linearCOG\] was employed to derive the Na$^+$ column densities.
Galactic ISM studies show that Na$^+$ to Ca$^+$ column density ratios span about four orders of magnitude, ranging from $\sim +2.5$ to $\sim -1.5$ dex (Routly & Spitzer 1952; Siluk & Silk 1974; Welty et al. 1996), which is mainly due to substantial differences in the depletion of Ca onto dust grains. Large ratios occur in cold, dense and quiescent clouds, whereas the smaller values can be attributed to environments where no significant depletion has yet occurred or where some Ca has been returned to the gas phase due to shocks, such as those in warm and/or high velocity clouds.
Finally, we note that our catalog has two cases where the and lines have doublet ratios which are clearly indicative of lines in the unsaturated regime. Both of these have $W_0^{\lambda 3934} < 0.6 \mathrm{\AA}$, and in those cases we calculate the Na$^+$/Ca$^+$ column density ratios to be $-0.36 \pm 0.06$ dex and $-0.04 \pm 0.10$ dex. These values fall within the range that is typical of the diffuse, warm neutral medium in the Milky Way, where T $= 10^2 - 10^4$ K and n$_H \leq 10$ atoms cm$^{-3}$ (Crawford 1992; Welty et al. 1996; Richter et. al 2011).
{width="75.00000%"}
Properties of Absorbers from Composite Spectra
===============================================
Here we explore the composite properties of the absorbers by considering the 435 absorbers in the Paper I catalog. We form two types of composite spectra. The first type is one constructed by median-combining continuum-normalized spectra. Element abundances will be inferred from this type of composite spectrum. The second type is formed using the geometric mean of unnormalized flux spectra (e.g., York et al. 2006, Vanden Berk et al. 2001). From this type of composite we will measure the overall extinction and reddening characteristics of the absorbers. This is done using unabsorbed quasar spectra that are matched (in emission redshift and $i$-band magnitude) to the absorber quasar spectra.
We form these two types of composites for our full sample and four different subsamples, which are subsets of the full sample. The rationale behind choosing the criteria to define the four subsamples was given in Paper I. In particular, Paper I showed the existence of two populations of absorbers that could be separated based upon the bimodality in the distribution of W$_0^{\lambda2796}$/W$_0^{\lambda3934}$ ratios, with the separation occurring at $\rm{W}_0^{\lambda 3934} = 0.7$Å. We also found that the change in slope of the $\rm{W}_0^{\lambda 3934}$ distribution occurred at W$_0^{\lambda2796}$/W$_0^{\lambda3934} = 1.8$. (See figures 17 and 18 of Paper I.) Therefore, we define the four subsamples as systems with $\rm{W}_0^{\lambda 3934}$ $< 0.7$Å and $\geq0.7$Å, and those with W$_0^{\lambda2796}$/W$_0^{\lambda3934}$ $< 1.8$ and $\geq 1.8$. The results we derive from the full sample are primarily discussed in this section, while the results from the four subsamples are primarily discussed in §5.
Normalized Composite Spectra
----------------------------
The stacking procedure begins by shifting all 435 normalized spectra to the absorber rest frame. To facilitate wavelength registration before doing this, we start by rebinning the spectra into a finer sub-pixel grid, the size of which is about one-tenth of the original pixel size. Since the median is a robust measure of central tendency which properly gives higher weight to spectra with lower noise, we chose to median-combine the spectra to build the normalized composite (Vanden Berk et al. 2001; Pieri et al. 2010). The error in the composite flux is estimated using the absolute deviations about the median flux (MAD), which is a robust estimator of variance, (e.g. Rousseeuw & Croux 1993; Lee-Brown et al. 2015). The final stack is then rebinned to 2-pixels per resolution element and then smoothed over two pixels for display purposes only.
Figure \[NormComposite400\] shows the full sample normalized composite spectrum, which was formed using all 435 SDSS absorber spectra identified in Paper I. Figures $3-6$ are the normalized composite spectra for the four subsamples (see §5 discussion). The error array of the full sample composite spectrum ranges between $\sim$2% and $\sim 8$% of the flux. The red vertical lines mark the rest-frame locations of the absorption features, which are typical of those identified in QAL studies. The wavelength coverage of the various spectra in the absorber rest frame allows access to absorption features that lie between and include $\lambda$1808 and $\lambda \lambda$5891,5897. Note that the stack includes absorber rest frame wavelengths down to $\sim 1700~\mathrm{\AA}$, but we do not attempt to measure any QALs at $\lambda \lesssim 1750$ Å because of potential errors in the continuum placement at the (noisy) blue end of SDSS spectra. Clearly seen in the normalized composite spectrum are the transitions of low-ionization lines such as , , , , , , and , as well as the higher-ionization transitions due to . In the individual SDSS spectra most of these transitions are too weak, and/or located in spectral regions with too poor signal-to-noise, to identify them. In the - region at shorter wavelengths, the composite is derived from only $\sim60$ out of $>400$ spectra, and thus it exhibits poorer signal-to-noise characteristics; on the other hand, at the longer wavelengths the region composite is comprised of $\sim200$ spectra. In Figure \[NormComposite400\] we only label those features with $\geq 2\sigma$ detections to avoid crowded labeling. We measure the rest equivalent widths by fitting Gaussian profiles to each feature, with the constraint that features have a minimum line width set by the resolution of the SDSS/BOSS spectra. The rest equivalent widths of the various QAL transitions are summarized in Table \[TableOne\]. For those lines which do not pass the 2$\sigma$ detection limit, we report $2\sigma$ upper limits. Composite results for the full sample and four subsamples are given in Table \[TableOne\].
{width="95.00000%"}
{width="95.00000%"}
{width="95.00000%"}
{width="95.00000%"}
{width="95.00000%"}
Column Densities and Element Abundance Ratios in Absorbers from their Composite Spectra
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column densities derived using Eq. \[linearCOG\] for the weak, unsaturated absorption lines in the full sample composite and the four subsample composites are reported in Table \[TableTwo\] along with their 1$\sigma$ uncertainties. The reported results are generally variance-weighted averages of column densities determined from accessible transitions of the ion, similar to the results reported in §3. We only provide results when significance levels are $\ge2 \sigma$, otherwise, 2$\sigma$ upper limits are reported.
The doublet ratios of and indicate that both may be partially saturated so we assign lower limits on their column densities. These column densities are consistent with those reported by previous authors using $\sim$10 times fewer systems (e.g., Wild et al. 2006, Nestor et al. 2008, Zych et al. 2009). However, none of these studies have sampled much of the $W_0^{\lambda 3934} \gtrsim 0.7$ Å regime. As in §3 we assume that the low-ionization column densities reported in Table \[TableTwo\] represent the dominant ionization state due to self-shielding and that no significant ionization corrections are needed. The solar abundance ratios relative to Zn and Fe, i.e., \[X/Zn\] and \[X/Fe\], are then tabulated in Table \[TableThree\] and Table \[TableFour\], respectively. The ratios relative to Zn can reveal depletion of elements on to dust grains relative to solar abundances, while ratios relative to Fe can show important enhancements (see below).
For the full sample, the results are generally consistent with DLA absorber populations over a range of redshifts (e.g., Turnshek et al. 1989, Pettini et al. 1999, Prochaska & Wolfe 2002, Ledoux et al. 2002, Prochaska et al. 2003, Akerman et al. 2005, Kulkarni et al. 2005, Battisti et al. 2012), and with the ratios seen in individual absorbers in the literature (e.g., Zych et al. 2009, Richter et al. 2011). Similar abundance ratios are also seen in metal-strong DLAs (MSDLAs), which are classified as those DLAs with logN(Zn$^+) \geq 13.15$ or $\log$N(Si$^+) \geq 15.95$ (Herbert-Fort et al. 2006), though the metal column densities of the absorbers are significantly lower than these values. The abundance ratios relative to Zn also approximately match the abundances ratios of the SMC as measured toward the star Sk 155 (Welty et al. 2001).
The wavelength coverage of the absorber spectra permits the detection of both Fe-peak (e.g., Cr, Mn, Fe) and $\alpha$-capture elements (e.g., Si, Ca, Ti).[^4] It is generally thought that the Fe-peak and $\alpha$-capture elements are synthesized in the lead-up to Type II supernovae events over timescales $< 10^7$ years, whereas Fe-peak elements are also synthesized through Type Ia supernovae events occurring over $10^8 - 10^9 $ years. Hence, studying the abundance of $\alpha$-elements relative to Fe-peak elements provides clues to the chemical and star-formation patterns of the absorber. Furthermore, since different elements display various affinities to dust, one can also characterize the absorber depletion patterns. But disentangling the degeneracy between depletion and chemical enrichment is often difficult (e.g. Lauroesch et al. 1996, Lu et al. 1996, Prochaska & Wolfe 2002, Vladilo 2002, Dessauges-Zavadsky, Prochaska & D’Odorico 2002, Welty & Crowther 2010). However, some constraints on the two effects can still be inferred from comparisons of various abundances against each other (Prochaska & Wolfe 2002; Herbert-Fort et al. 2006). An enhanced \[Ti/Fe\] generally implies a Type II enrichment pattern, while an enhancement of \[Si/Fe\] suggests a population that is strongly depleted by dust. The \[Ti/Zn\] ratio is generally not a clear tracer of depletion, and using it would likely under-estimate the extent of depletion; however, the \[Ti/Zn\] ratio we observe for the absorbers does hint at some level of depletion of Ti on to dust grains. The enhancements of \[Si/Fe\], \[Zn/Fe\], and \[Si/Ti\] all unanimously indicate strong depletions in the typical absorber (Prochaska & Wolfe 2002 ).
Limits on Electron Densities in Absorbing Gas
-----------------------------------------------
The improvement in signal to noise which results when forming composite spectra allows us to derive some constraints on the electron density of the absorbing gas. Under ionization equilibrium, the balance between a neutral element $X$ and a singly ionized element $X^+$ is
$$\frac{n(X^+)}{n(X^0)} = \frac{\Gamma}{\alpha(T) n_e}$$
where n(X) denotes the volume density of X, $\Gamma$ is the photoionization rate of X to X$^{+}$, $\alpha$ is the temperature-dependent recombination coefficient to form X$^0$ from X$^+$, and $n_e$ is the electron density. For gas of uniform density this can also be expressed using column densities by replacing $n(X)$ and $n(X^+)$ with the column densities $N(X)$ and $N(X^+)$, respectively (e.g., Prochaska, Chen & Bloom 2006). In principle, constraints on $n_e$ could be obtained using observations of Fe, Ca, and Mg transitions. However, except for , no transitions from a neutral atom are observed at $\geq 2\sigma$ in the composite. Also, the and doublet ratios show some indications of saturation. Therefore, the most conservative way to place constraints on $n_e$ is to use column density results derived from the observed lines and the absence of observed . These column density results are reported in Table \[TableTwo\].
The frequency integral of the product of the Fe photoionization cross section (Verner et al. 1996) and the local UV background (Mathis, Mezger, & Panagia 1983) yields $\Gamma = 1.9 \times 10^{-10}$ s$^{-1}$. The total (radiative+dielectronic) recombination coefficient for Fe$^{+1}$ is $\alpha = 7.2 \times 10^{-13}$ cm$^3$ s$^{-1}$ at T$=10^4$ K (Mazzotta et al. 1998; Verner et al. 1999). This yields an average $2\sigma$ upper limit of $n_e \leq 2$ cm$^{-3}$ from the various composites, which is $\sim10$ times larger than the limits reported based on the analysis of higher-quality observations of individual absorbers by Nestor et al. (2008) and Zych et al. (2011).
Dust in Absorbing Gas {#red}
----------------------
The average extinction and reddening of absorbing gas can be derived by forming composites using the geometric mean of unnormalized flux spectra. This is done for the full sample of absorbers and the four subsamples. The approach we take to form these composites is similar to the one taken in York et al. (2006). That is, when we construct a composite using absorber flux spectra, we also construct an unabsorbed reference composite.
Specifically, we define a non-absorber match for every absorber in the sample. The match is determined using the quasar SDSS $i$-band magnitude and emission redshift $z_{em}$. To find a match, we formed a list of all SDSS quasars up to DR9 with $z_{em} > 0.1$ and $i < 20$ mag. We then eliminated those quasars with known intervening absorption (Quider et al. 2010; Monier et al., in prep, $private$ $communication$), absorption (Paper I), or broad absorption lines (Shen et al. 2011). A tentative match between a absorber spectrum and an unabsorbed quasar spectrum is then determined by finding an unabsorbed quasar that lies closest to the absorbed quasar in $\Delta i$/$<\!\!i\!\!> - \Delta z_{em}$/$<\!\!z_{em}\!\!>$ space, where $\Delta i$ and $\Delta z_{em}$ represent differences between the absorbed and matching unabsorbed quasar properties.
Initial matches are accepted for those with $|\Delta i| \leq 0.20$ and $|\Delta z_{em}| \leq 0.01$ since we found it especially important to have similar emission features in both spectra. However, we also visually inspected initial matches for any missed absorption transitions because, of course, its presence in the unabsorbed list has the potential to cause extra extinction/reddening in the “unabsorbed” quasar spectrum, which could affect our analysis. In addition, we checked for other issues such as broad intrinsic emission in the matched unabsorbed quasar spectra, which may lead to significant unmatched broad features in individual absorbed and unabsorbed spectra. When these types of problems occurred, we removed the quasar from the unabsorbed quasar list and re-ran the matching process until a satisfactory match was found. In the end, we found that it was not possible to find a suitable match with $|\Delta i| \leq 0.2$ and $|\Delta z_{em}| \leq 0.01$ for $41$ of our absorbers, which is $\sim10$% of our full sample. We did accept seven of those $41$ since the matches were not too discrepant. Figure \[MatchDist\] illustrates the distribution of $\Delta i$ and $\Delta z_{em}$ for our final matches. Red points mark the seven closer outliers which just missed matching our search criteria but were included. Figure \[Match\] illustrates an example case of an individual absorber and its match. Fifty per cent of the final matches are within $|\Delta i| \leq 0.014$ mag and $|\Delta z_{em}| \leq 0.001$, and the median and average values of the distributions of $\Delta i$ and $\Delta z_{em}$ are indistinguishable from zero.
{width="75.00000%"}
{width="75.00000%"}
To assess extinction and reddening we are interested in comparing the absorber fluxed composite continuum (which is in the rest frame of the absorber) to the unabsorbed reference continuum. To this end, we constructed the composites for our extinction analysis by taking the geometric mean of those absorbed spectra which have suitable unabsorbed matches, hence we used 401 sets of absorbed-unabsorbed spectra. A quasar continuum generally follows a power-law and the geometric mean of a set of power-law spectra preserves the average power-law index. Therefore, this is an appropriate method to use to determine the average extinction law, which is also likely to be similar to a power-law.
To form a fluxed composite each absorbed quasar spectrum and its match were shifted to the absorber rest frame after rebinning to a wavelength scale that was one-tenth of the original pixel size in order to make the registration of spectra accurate. The final composites were then rebinned to a wavelength scale of 1 Å per pixel in the rest frame. The standard deviation, $\sigma_{\lambda,g}$, in the geometric mean is given by
$$\ln\sigma_{\lambda,g} = \sqrt{\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^{N} \left[\ln{\left(\frac{f_{\lambda, i}}{\mu_{\lambda,g}}\right)}\right]^2 }$$
where $\mu_{\lambda,g}$ is the geometric mean of $N$ fluxes and $f_{\lambda, i}$ are the individual spectrum fluxes as a function of wavelength (Kirkwood 1979). The top panel of Figure \[Extinct400\] shows the matched composites for the full sample, with the absorber sample in red and the unabsorbed reference sample in blue. Figures 10-11 illustrate this in the four subsamples (see §5 discussion.) The errors in the full sample composite typically lie in the range $1.8 - 2.2 \times 10^{-17}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ Å$^{-1}$ level. Prominent absorption features from transitions of , , , and are clear in the absorber composite. The bottom panel shows the flux ratios between the absorbed and unabsorbed composites. Overlaid are extinction model fits to the data: the magenta dashed line shows a LMC-like dust model (Gordon et al. 2003), the solid green line shows a SMC-like model (Gordon et al. 2003), and the dashed-dot cyan lines show a standard Milky Way model (Fitzpatrick 1999). All fits have been made over a wavelength range $\geq 2500$ Å to ensure more uniform noise characteristics across the wavelength range when performing the fits.
In Table \[TableZero\] we summarize the modeled or observed absorbed-to-unabsorbed flux ratios at $\lambda_{rest} = 2200$ Å, $\mathcal{R}$, and color excesses, $E(B-V)$, for the full sample and four subsamples. For the full sample the observed $\mathcal{R}$ is 0.83, which is best matched by either the LMC or SMC; the color excess is inferred to be $E(B-V) \approx 0.03$. Over the fitted range ($\lambda > 2500$ Å) the LMC and SMC models are nearly indistinguishable, while the MW dust law is definitely ruled out. Wild et al. (2006) concluded that an LMC extinction law applied to the sample of absorbers that they studied. We also note for comparison that an SMC-like extinction curve with $E(B-V) < 0.02$ mag has been inferred using DLA and samples (Murphy & Liske 2004; York et al. 2006; Vladilo, Prochaska & Wolfe 2008).
{width="95.00000%"}
{width="95.00000%"}
{width="95.00000%"}
Implications of the Results for Absorber Populations Using the Subsamples
==========================================================================
As indicated at the beginning of §4, in Paper I we found that while absorbers are rare, they are unlikely to represent a single type or population of absorber. The W$_0^{\lambda3934}$ distribution requires a two-component exponential to satisfactorily fit the data, hinting at the existence of at least two distinct populations. This persists across our survey redshift interval, $z_{abs} \lesssim 1.4$. Upon further analysis of the survey data, it was also shown that when the properties of these absorbers are taken into account, it is possible to more clearly separate the absorbers into two populations at the $> 99\%$ confidence level. In this section we investigate whether the chemical and dust depletion properties of subsamples of absorbers are consistent with the statistical evidence for two populations.
To do this, we divide the full sample into four subsamples, and we analyze the subsamples in the same way we analyze the full sample as discussed in §4. The tabulations of results and the figures on subsamples are in Tables $3-7$ and Figures $3-6$ and $10-11$. Recall (Paper I and §4) that we divide the full sample as follows. Two subsamples were formed by separating the full sample at $W_0^{\lambda3934} = 0.7$ Å, which results in $\sim 200$ absorbers in each. This is also the separation which exhibits the maximum difference between two populations from KS tests. We also form two more subsamples by separating the full sample at $W_0^{\lambda2796}$/$W_0^{\lambda3934} = 1.8$, but only $\sim 30$ absorbers have $W_0^{\lambda2796}$/$W_0^{\lambda3934} < 1.8$.
Figures \[Fig3\] and \[Fig4\] show the normalized composite spectra of the two subsamples of absorbers separated at $W_0^{\lambda3934} = 0.7$ Å. The measurements of the equivalent widths are reported in Table \[TableOne\]. The corresponding ionic column densities derived from unsaturated lines of , , , , and are tabulated in Table \[TableTwo\]. Estimates on the abundance ratios relative to Zn and Fe are inferred in Tables \[TableThree\] and \[TableFour\], assuming no ionization corrections. The results clearly indicate that the two subsamples separated at $W_0^{\lambda3934} = 0.7$ Å reveal the existence of two broadly defined populations of absorbers in terms of their element abundance ratios and depletion measures, although there is likely some cross-mixing between the two populations given the crude way they were separated. However, the two subsamples formed by separating the full sample at $W_0^{\lambda2796}$/$W_0^{\lambda3934} = 1.8$ do not allow us to draw a similar type of conclusion because only $\sim 30$ absorbers have $W_0^{\lambda2796}$/$W_0^{\lambda3934} < 1.8$, which compromises the accuracy of this particular measurement. Results from the $W_0^{\lambda2796}$/$W_0^{\lambda3934} \ge 1.8$ subsample are very similar to $W_0^{\lambda3934} < 0.7$ Å results.
Figure \[CoolWarmDisk\] shows the log of the abundance ratios of Si, Mn, Cr, Fe, Ni, and Ti relative to Zn, as measured with respect to solar values. The elements on the x-axis are ordered left-to-right in increasing condensation temperatures. Filled symbols are Galactic abundance measurements for the halo (green squares), cold disk (brown circles), and warm disk (red diamonds) obtained from the compilations of Welty et al. (1999). The halo + disk (blue triangles) abundances are taken from Savage & Sembach (1996). Measurements pertaining to absorbers with $W_0^{\lambda3934} < 0.7$ Å are shown as filled green circles while those with $W_0^{\lambda3934} \geq 0.7$ Å are blue asterisks; results for absorbers with $W_0^{\lambda2796}$/$W_0^{\lambda3934} \ge 1.8$ are shown as filled orange triangles and are seen to be very similar to the $W_0^{\lambda3934} < 0.7$ Å results; the $W_0^{\lambda2796}$/$W_0^{\lambda3934} < 1.8$ results are not shown due to their poor accuracy.
Figures 10 and 11 illustrate the extinction and reddening results for the four subsamples. A tabulation of observed results and best-fit extinction laws are given in Table 7.
The stronger absorber subsample ($W_0^{\lambda3934} \ge 0.7$ Å) is seen in Figure \[CoolWarmDisk\] to be similar to the halo + disk component in terms of both chemical enrichment and element depletions on to dust grains. This conclusion is consistent with both the best-fit LMC or SMC dust extinction laws for our stronger absorber subsample (right panel of Figure 10). This is our most heavily reddened subsample, with an absorbed-to-unabsorbed flux ratio at 2200 Å of $\mathcal{R}=0.73$ (Table 7). A MW extinction law is clearly ruled out for the stronger absorber subsample. However, the weaker absorber subsample ($W_0^{\lambda3934} < 0.7$ Å) is seen to have chemical enrichment and element depletion characteristics of the warm halo component, and there is much less reddening due to dust extinction (left panel of Figure 10 and Table 7), with $\mathcal{R}=0.95$. Calculating the optical depths from the flux ratios indicate that the stronger absorbers are nearly six times more reddened than the weaker absorbers.
Previous studies of the stronger absorption systems have been very limited until now. In the future it will be important to explore the properties of individual absorption systems (especially the stronger ones) with high-resolution spectroscopy in order to measure their kinematics and better characterize their chemistry.
{width="75.00000%"}
Summary and Conclusions
=======================
We have used statistical results on the 435 absorbers identified in SDSS quasar spectra (Paper I) to derive results on their element abundance ratios and dust properties. In contrast to earlier studies, this new large sample includes a large number ($\approx 200$) of $W_0^{\lambda3934} \geq 0.7$ Å absorbers at redshifts $z_{abs} < 1.4$. We present results on a number of individual absorption systems in Tables 1 and 2. More importantly, by median-combining $>$ 400 normalized spectra for the full sample and four subsamples, we have formed high signal-to-noise normalized composite spectra and used them to detect (or place limits on) low-ionization metal lines due to , , , , , , , , , , , , , and , as included within the redshifted spectral coverage of the SDSS spectrograph. These have been used to investigate element abundance ratios in absorbers. We also formed absorber fluxed composite spectra and matching unabsorbed fluxed composite spectra of the full sample and four subsamples to investigate extinction and reddening in absorbers.
We tested a hypothesis put forth in Paper I. Namely, that the sensitivity-corrected W$_0^{\lambda3934}$ distribution of absorbers follows a shape that is suggestive of at least two populations of absorbers, separated at W$_0^{\lambda3934} = 0.7$ Å. We therefore hypothesized that analysis of two subsamples divided at W$_0^{\lambda3934} = 0.7$ Å would allow us to reveal the nature of these two populations, and this turned out to be the case. We also showed in Paper I that by using information on in absorbers we could statistically infer the presence of two populations divided at W$_0^{\lambda2796}$/W$_0^{\lambda3934} = 1.8$, but unfortunately only $\sim30$ absorbers are in the subsample with W$_0^{\lambda2796}$/W$_0^{\lambda3934} < 1.8$, so we could not make an accurate comparison of these other two subsamples using this criterion.
Because of our findings, in what follows we will refer to the W$_0^{\lambda3934} \ge 0.7$ Åabsorbers as the strong absorbers, and the W$_0^{\lambda3934} < 0.7$ Å absorbers as the weak absorbers.
Analysis of the element abundance ratios derived for Si, Mn, Cr, Fe, Ni, and Ti relative to Zn using normalized composite spectra indicate that the abundance pattern of the strong absorbers is intermediate between disk- and halo-type gas (see Figure 12). The results indicate more significant depletions of the highly refractory elements of Cr, Fe, Ni, and Ti in the strong absorbers. In addition, independent of the absorption line analysis, which was based on normalized composites, an investigation of the extinction and reddening in the strong absorbers using the ratio of the absorbed-to-unabsorbed composite fluxed spectra shows that they are a significantly reddened population of absorbers, with the absorbed-to-unabsorbed composite flux ratio at $\lambda_{rest} = 2200$ Å being $\mathcal{R} \approx 0.73$ and $E(B-V) \approx 0.046$, consistent with a LMC or SMC dust law (right hand panel of Figure 10 and Table 7). Our data do not allow us to distinguish between an LMC versus SMC reddening law.
At the same time, we showed that the weak absorbers have an abundance pattern typical of halo-type gas with less depletion of the highly refractory elements of Cr, Fe, Ni, and Ti (also Figure 12). Again independent of the absorption line analysis, we find that the weak absorbers are nearly six times less reddened than the strong absorbers, with $\mathcal{R} \approx 0.95$ and $E(B-V) \approx 0.011$ (left hand panel of Figure 10 and Table 7).
Thus, the results of this analysis have confirmed the hypothesis that at least two populations of absorbers exist, consistent with the statistical evidence in Paper I. Thanks to the high-signal-to-noise composite spectra, we were able to identify the striking differences in the element abundance ratios, depletion patterns, and dust extinction and reddening properties of the two populations of absorbers divided at W$_0^{\lambda3934} = 0.7$ Å. In Paper III we will explore the association between absorbers and galaxies.
Acknowledgments {#acknowledgments .unnumbered}
===============
GMS acknowledges support from a Zaccheus Daniel Fellowship and a Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences Graduate PITT PACC Fellowship from the University of Pittsburgh.
Funding for SDSS has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions, the National Science Foundation, and the US Department of Energy Office of Science. The SDSS is managed by the Astrophysical Research Consortium for the Participating Institutions. The Participating Institutions are the American Museum of Natural History, Astrophysical Institute Potsdam, University of Basel, University of Cambridge, Case Western Reserve University, University of Chicago, Drexel University, Fermilab, the Institute for Advanced Study, the Japan Participation Group, Johns Hopkins University, the Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, the Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, the Korean Scientist Group, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST), Los Alamos National Laboratory, the Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA), the Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA), New Mexico State University, Ohio State University, University of Pittsburgh, University of Portsmouth, Princeton University, the United States Naval Observatory, and the University of Washington.
[^1]: The doublet ratio is defined here as $\mathrm{DR = W_0^{\lambda3934}/W_0^{\lambda3969}}$.
[^2]: In some systems comparisons of $\lambda2852$ to $\lambda\lambda2796,2803$ suggest that $\lambda2852$ may be approaching saturation, but neglecting this does not introduce a significant uncertainty.
[^3]: Wild et al. (2006) abundance ratios were derived from composite spectra constructed from 37 absorbers from SDSS DR3. One of their results was for their entire sample, while two additional result were presented for “High” and “Low” $W_0^{\lambda 3934}$ values on either side of their median $W_0^{\lambda3934} = 0.68~\mathrm{\AA}$ value.
[^4]: Ti is not an $\alpha$ element, but it shows abundance patterns similar to other $\alpha$ elements in Galactic stars (Edvardsson et al. 1995; François et al. 2004)
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: |
Using E1 radiative transitions $\psi(3686) \to \gamma\chi_{cJ}$ from a sample of $(448.1 \pm 2.9)\times10^{6}$ $\psi(3686)$ events collected with the BESIII detector, the decays $\chi_{cJ}\to
\Sigma^{+}\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}+c.c.~(J = 0, 1, 2)$ are studied. The decay branching fractions are measured to be $\mathcal{B}(\chi_{c0}\to \Sigma^{+}\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}+c.c.) = (3.52
\pm 0.19\pm 0.21)\times10^{-4}$, $\mathcal{B}(\chi_{c1}\to
\Sigma^{+}\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}+c.c.) = (1.53 \pm 0.10\pm
0.08)\times10^{-4}$, and $\mathcal{B}(\chi_{c2}\to
\Sigma^{+}\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}+c.c.) = (8.25 \pm 0.83 \pm
0.49)\times10^{-5}$, where the first and second uncertainties are the statistical and systematic ones, respectively. No evident intermediate resonances are observed in the studied processes.
author:
- |
M. Ablikim$^{1}$, M. N. Achasov$^{10,d}$, P. Adlarson$^{60}$, S. Ahmed$^{15}$, M. Albrecht$^{4}$, M. Alekseev$^{59A,59C}$, A. Amoroso$^{59A,59C}$, F. F. An$^{1}$, Q. An$^{56,44}$, Y. Bai$^{43}$, O. Bakina$^{27}$, R. Baldini Ferroli$^{23A}$, I. Balossino$^{24A}$, Y. Ban$^{36,l}$, K. Begzsuren$^{25}$, J. V. Bennett$^{5}$, N. Berger$^{26}$, M. Bertani$^{23A}$, D. Bettoni$^{24A}$, F. Bianchi$^{59A,59C}$, J Biernat$^{60}$, J. Bloms$^{53}$, I. Boyko$^{27}$, R. A. Briere$^{5}$, H. Cai$^{61}$, X. Cai$^{1,44}$, A. Calcaterra$^{23A}$, G. F. Cao$^{1,48}$, N. Cao$^{1,48}$, S. A. Cetin$^{47B}$, J. Chai$^{59C}$, J. F. Chang$^{1,44}$, W. L. Chang$^{1,48}$, G. Chelkov$^{27,b,c}$, D. Y. Chen$^{6}$, G. Chen$^{1}$, H. S. Chen$^{1,48}$, J. Chen$^{16}$, M. L. Chen$^{1,44}$, S. J. Chen$^{34}$, Y. B. Chen$^{1,44}$, W. Cheng$^{59C}$, G. Cibinetto$^{24A}$, F. Cossio$^{59C}$, X. F. Cui$^{35}$, H. L. Dai$^{1,44}$, J. P. Dai$^{39,h}$, X. C. Dai$^{1,48}$, A. Dbeyssi$^{15}$, D. Dedovich$^{27}$, Z. Y. Deng$^{1}$, A. Denig$^{26}$, I. Denysenko$^{27}$, M. Destefanis$^{59A,59C}$, F. De Mori$^{59A,59C}$, Y. Ding$^{32}$, C. Dong$^{35}$, J. Dong$^{1,44}$, L. Y. Dong$^{1,48}$, M. Y. Dong$^{1,44,48}$, Z. L. Dou$^{34}$, S. X. Du$^{64}$, J. Z. Fan$^{46}$, J. Fang$^{1,44}$, S. S. Fang$^{1,48}$, Y. Fang$^{1}$, R. Farinelli$^{24A,24B}$, L. Fava$^{59B,59C}$, F. Feldbauer$^{4}$, G. Felici$^{23A}$, C. Q. Feng$^{56,44}$, M. Fritsch$^{4}$, C. D. Fu$^{1}$, Y. Fu$^{1}$, Q. Gao$^{1}$, X. L. Gao$^{56,44}$, Y. Gao$^{57}$, Y. Gao$^{46}$, Y. G. Gao$^{6}$, B. Garillon$^{26}$, I. Garzia$^{24A}$, E. M. Gersabeck$^{51}$, A. Gilman$^{52}$, K. Goetzen$^{11}$, L. Gong$^{35}$, W. X. Gong$^{1,44}$, W. Gradl$^{26}$, M. Greco$^{59A,59C}$, L. M. Gu$^{34}$, M. H. Gu$^{1,44}$, S. Gu$^{2}$, Y. T. Gu$^{13}$, A. Q. Guo$^{22}$, L. B. Guo$^{33}$, R. P. Guo$^{37}$, Y. P. Guo$^{26}$, A. Guskov$^{27}$, S. Han$^{61}$, X. Q. Hao$^{16}$, F. A. Harris$^{49}$, K. L. He$^{1,48}$, F. H. Heinsius$^{4}$, T. Held$^{4}$, Y. K. Heng$^{1,44,48}$, M. Himmelreich$^{11,g}$, Y. R. Hou$^{48}$, Z. L. Hou$^{1}$, H. M. Hu$^{1,48}$, J. F. Hu$^{39,h}$, T. Hu$^{1,44,48}$, Y. Hu$^{1}$, G. S. Huang$^{56,44}$, J. S. Huang$^{16}$, X. T. Huang$^{38}$, X. Z. Huang$^{34}$, N. Huesken$^{53}$, T. Hussain$^{58}$, W. Ikegami Andersson$^{60}$, W. Imoehl$^{22}$, M. Irshad$^{56,44}$, Q. Ji$^{1}$, Q. P. Ji$^{16}$, X. B. Ji$^{1,48}$, X. L. Ji$^{1,44}$, H. L. Jiang$^{38}$, X. S. Jiang$^{1,44,48}$, X. Y. Jiang$^{35}$, J. B. Jiao$^{38}$, Z. Jiao$^{18}$, D. P. Jin$^{1,44,48}$, S. Jin$^{34}$, Y. Jin$^{50}$, T. Johansson$^{60}$, N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki$^{29}$, X. S. Kang$^{32}$, R. Kappert$^{29}$, M. Kavatsyuk$^{29}$, B. C. Ke$^{1}$, I. K. Keshk$^{4}$, A. Khoukaz$^{53}$, P. Kiese$^{26}$, R. Kiuchi$^{1}$, R. Kliemt$^{11}$, L. Koch$^{28}$, O. B. Kolcu$^{47B,f}$, B. Kopf$^{4}$, M. Kuemmel$^{4}$, M. Kuessner$^{4}$, A. Kupsc$^{60}$, M. Kurth$^{1}$, M. G. Kurth$^{1,48}$, W. Kühn$^{28}$, J. S. Lange$^{28}$, P. Larin$^{15}$, L. Lavezzi$^{59C}$, H. Leithoff$^{26}$, T. Lenz$^{26}$, C. Li$^{60}$, C. H. Li$^{31}$, Cheng Li$^{56,44}$, D. M. Li$^{64}$, F. Li$^{1,44}$, G. Li$^{1}$, H. B. Li$^{1,48}$, H. J. Li$^{9,j}$, J. C. Li$^{1}$, Ke Li$^{1}$, L. K. Li$^{1}$, Lei Li$^{3}$, P. L. Li$^{56,44}$, P. R. Li$^{30}$, W. D. Li$^{1,48}$, W. G. Li$^{1}$, X. H. Li$^{56,44}$, X. L. Li$^{38}$, X. N. Li$^{1,44}$, Z. B. Li$^{45}$, Z. Y. Li$^{45}$, H. Liang$^{1,48}$, H. Liang$^{56,44}$, Y. F. Liang$^{41}$, Y. T. Liang$^{28}$, G. R. Liao$^{12}$, L. Z. Liao$^{1,48}$, J. Libby$^{21}$, C. X. Lin$^{45}$, D. X. Lin$^{15}$, Y. J. Lin$^{13}$, B. Liu$^{39,h}$, B. J. Liu$^{1}$, C. X. Liu$^{1}$, D. Liu$^{56,44}$, D. Y. Liu$^{39,h}$, F. H. Liu$^{40}$, Fang Liu$^{1}$, Feng Liu$^{6}$, H. B. Liu$^{13}$, H. M. Liu$^{1,48}$, Huanhuan Liu$^{1}$, Huihui Liu$^{17}$, J. B. Liu$^{56,44}$, J. Y. Liu$^{1,48}$, K. Liu$^{1}$, K. Y. Liu$^{32}$, Ke Liu$^{6}$, L. Y. Liu$^{13}$, Q. Liu$^{48}$, S. B. Liu$^{56,44}$, T. Liu$^{1,48}$, X. Liu$^{30}$, X. Y. Liu$^{1,48}$, Y. B. Liu$^{35}$, Z. A. Liu$^{1,44,48}$, Zhiqing Liu$^{38}$, Y. F. Long$^{36,l}$, X. C. Lou$^{1,44,48}$, H. J. Lu$^{18}$, J. D. Lu$^{1,48}$, J. G. Lu$^{1,44}$, Y. Lu$^{1}$, Y. P. Lu$^{1,44}$, C. L. Luo$^{33}$, M. X. Luo$^{63}$, P. W. Luo$^{45}$, T. Luo$^{9,j}$, X. L. Luo$^{1,44}$, S. Lusso$^{59C}$, X. R. Lyu$^{48}$, F. C. Ma$^{32}$, H. L. Ma$^{1}$, L. L. Ma$^{38}$, M. M. Ma$^{1,48}$, Q. M. Ma$^{1}$, X. N. Ma$^{35}$, X. X. Ma$^{1,48}$, X. Y. Ma$^{1,44}$, Y. M. Ma$^{38}$, F. E. Maas$^{15}$, M. Maggiora$^{59A,59C}$, S. Maldaner$^{26}$, S. Malde$^{54}$, Q. A. Malik$^{58}$, A. Mangoni$^{23B}$, Y. J. Mao$^{36,l}$, Z. P. Mao$^{1}$, S. Marcello$^{59A,59C}$, Z. X. Meng$^{50}$, J. G. Messchendorp$^{29}$, G. Mezzadri$^{24A}$, J. Min$^{1,44}$, T. J. Min$^{34}$, R. E. Mitchell$^{22}$, X. H. Mo$^{1,44,48}$, Y. J. Mo$^{6}$, C. Morales Morales$^{15}$, N. Yu. Muchnoi$^{10,d}$, H. Muramatsu$^{52}$, A. Mustafa$^{4}$, S. Nakhoul$^{11,g}$, Y. Nefedov$^{27}$, F. Nerling$^{11,g}$, I. B. Nikolaev$^{10,d}$, Z. Ning$^{1,44}$, S. Nisar$^{8,k}$, S. L. Niu$^{1,44}$, S. L. Olsen$^{48}$, Q. Ouyang$^{1,44,48}$, S. Pacetti$^{23B}$, Y. Pan$^{56,44}$, M. Papenbrock$^{60}$, P. Patteri$^{23A}$, M. Pelizaeus$^{4}$, H. P. Peng$^{56,44}$, K. Peters$^{11,g}$, J. Pettersson$^{60}$, J. L. Ping$^{33}$, R. G. Ping$^{1,48}$, A. Pitka$^{4}$, R. Poling$^{52}$, V. Prasad$^{56,44}$, M. Qi$^{34}$, S. Qian$^{1,44}$, C. F. Qiao$^{48}$, X. P. Qin$^{13}$, X. S. Qin$^{4}$, Z. H. Qin$^{1,44}$, J. F. Qiu$^{1}$, S. Q. Qu$^{35}$, K. H. Rashid$^{58,i}$, K. Ravindran$^{21}$, C. F. Redmer$^{26}$, M. Richter$^{4}$, A. Rivetti$^{59C}$, V. Rodin$^{29}$, M. Rolo$^{59C}$, G. Rong$^{1,48}$, Ch. Rosner$^{15}$, M. Rump$^{53}$, A. Sarantsev$^{27,e}$, M. Savrié$^{24B}$, Y. Schelhaas$^{26}$, K. Schoenning$^{60}$, W. Shan$^{19}$, X. Y. Shan$^{56,44}$, M. Shao$^{56,44}$, C. P. Shen$^{2}$, P. X. Shen$^{35}$, X. Y. Shen$^{1,48}$, H. Y. Sheng$^{1}$, X. Shi$^{1,44}$, X. D Shi$^{56,44}$, J. J. Song$^{38}$, Q. Q. Song$^{56,44}$, X. Y. Song$^{1}$, S. Sosio$^{59A,59C}$, C. Sowa$^{4}$, S. Spataro$^{59A,59C}$, F. F. Sui$^{38}$, G. X. Sun$^{1}$, J. F. Sun$^{16}$, L. Sun$^{61}$, S. S. Sun$^{1,48}$, X. H. Sun$^{1}$, Y. J. Sun$^{56,44}$, Y. K Sun$^{56,44}$, Y. Z. Sun$^{1}$, Z. J. Sun$^{1,44}$, Z. T. Sun$^{1}$, Y. T Tan$^{56,44}$, C. J. Tang$^{41}$, G. Y. Tang$^{1}$, X. Tang$^{1}$, V. Thoren$^{60}$, B. Tsednee$^{25}$, I. Uman$^{47D}$, B. Wang$^{1}$, B. L. Wang$^{48}$, C. W. Wang$^{34}$, D. Y. Wang$^{36,l}$, K. Wang$^{1,44}$, L. L. Wang$^{1}$, L. S. Wang$^{1}$, M. Wang$^{38}$, M. Z. Wang$^{36,l}$, Meng Wang$^{1,48}$, P. L. Wang$^{1}$, R. M. Wang$^{62}$, W. P. Wang$^{56,44}$, X. Wang$^{36,l}$, X. F. Wang$^{1}$, X. L. Wang$^{9,j}$, Y. Wang$^{45}$, Y. Wang$^{56,44}$, Y. F. Wang$^{1,44,48}$, Y. Q. Wang$^{1}$, Z. Wang$^{1,44}$, Z. G. Wang$^{1,44}$, Z. Y. Wang$^{1}$, Z. Y. Wang$^{48}$, Zongyuan Wang$^{1,48}$, T. Weber$^{4}$, D. H. Wei$^{12}$, P. Weidenkaff$^{26}$, F. Weidner$^{53}$, H. W. Wen$^{33}$, S. P. Wen$^{1}$, U. Wiedner$^{4}$, G. Wilkinson$^{54}$, M. Wolke$^{60}$, L. H. Wu$^{1}$, L. J. Wu$^{1,48}$, Z. Wu$^{1,44}$, L. Xia$^{56,44}$, Y. Xia$^{20}$, S. Y. Xiao$^{1}$, Y. J. Xiao$^{1,48}$, Z. J. Xiao$^{33}$, Y. G. Xie$^{1,44}$, Y. H. Xie$^{6}$, T. Y. Xing$^{1,48}$, X. A. Xiong$^{1,48}$, Q. L. Xiu$^{1,44}$, G. F. Xu$^{1}$, J. J. Xu$^{34}$, L. Xu$^{1}$, Q. J. Xu$^{14}$, W. Xu$^{1,48}$, X. P. Xu$^{42}$, F. Yan$^{57}$, L. Yan$^{59A,59C}$, W. B. Yan$^{56,44}$, W. C. Yan$^{2}$, Y. H. Yan$^{20}$, H. J. Yang$^{39,h}$, H. X. Yang$^{1}$, L. Yang$^{61}$, R. X. Yang$^{56,44}$, S. L. Yang$^{1,48}$, Y. H. Yang$^{34}$, Y. X. Yang$^{12}$, Yifan Yang$^{1,48}$, Z. Q. Yang$^{20}$, M. Ye$^{1,44}$, M. H. Ye$^{7}$, J. H. Yin$^{1}$, Z. Y. You$^{45}$, B. X. Yu$^{1,44,48}$, C. X. Yu$^{35}$, J. S. Yu$^{20}$, T. Yu$^{57}$, C. Z. Yuan$^{1,48}$, X. Q. Yuan$^{36,l}$, Y. Yuan$^{1}$, C. X. Yue$^{31}$, A. Yuncu$^{47B,a}$, A. A. Zafar$^{58}$, Y. Zeng$^{20}$, B. X. Zhang$^{1}$, B. Y. Zhang$^{1,44}$, C. C. Zhang$^{1}$, D. H. Zhang$^{1}$, H. H. Zhang$^{45}$, H. Y. Zhang$^{1,44}$, J. Zhang$^{1,48}$, J. L. Zhang$^{62}$, J. Q. Zhang$^{4}$, J. W. Zhang$^{1,44,48}$, J. Y. Zhang$^{1}$, J. Z. Zhang$^{1,48}$, K. Zhang$^{1,48}$, L. Zhang$^{1}$, Lei Zhang$^{34}$, S. F. Zhang$^{34}$, T. J. Zhang$^{39,h}$, X. Y. Zhang$^{38}$, Y. Zhang$^{56,44}$, Y. H. Zhang$^{1,44}$, Y. T. Zhang$^{56,44}$, Yang Zhang$^{1}$, Yao Zhang$^{1}$, Yi Zhang$^{9,j}$, Yu Zhang$^{48}$, Z. H. Zhang$^{6}$, Z. P. Zhang$^{56}$, Z. Y. Zhang$^{61}$, G. Zhao$^{1}$, J. Zhao$^{31}$, J. W. Zhao$^{1,44}$, J. Y. Zhao$^{1,48}$, J. Z. Zhao$^{1,44}$, Lei Zhao$^{56,44}$, Ling Zhao$^{1}$, M. G. Zhao$^{35}$, Q. Zhao$^{1}$, S. J. Zhao$^{64}$, T. C. Zhao$^{1}$, Y. B. Zhao$^{1,44}$, Z. G. Zhao$^{56,44}$, A. Zhemchugov$^{27,b}$, B. Zheng$^{57}$, J. P. Zheng$^{1,44}$, Y. Zheng$^{36,l}$, Y. H. Zheng$^{48}$, B. Zhong$^{33}$, L. Zhou$^{1,44}$, L. P. Zhou$^{1,48}$, Q. Zhou$^{1,48}$, X. Zhou$^{61}$, X. K. Zhou$^{48}$, X. R. Zhou$^{56,44}$, Xiaoyu Zhou$^{20}$, Xu Zhou$^{20}$, A. N. Zhu$^{1,48}$, J. Zhu$^{35}$, J. Zhu$^{45}$, K. Zhu$^{1}$, K. J. Zhu$^{1,44,48}$, S. H. Zhu$^{55}$, W. J. Zhu$^{35}$, X. L. Zhu$^{46}$, Y. C. Zhu$^{56,44}$, Y. S. Zhu$^{1,48}$, Z. A. Zhu$^{1,48}$, J. Zhuang$^{1,44}$, B. S. Zou$^{1}$, J. H. Zou$^{1}$\
(BESIII Collaboration)\
---
Introduction
============
The first charmonium states with $J^{PC}= J^{++}$ discovered after the $J/\psi$ and $\psi (3686)$ were the $\chi_{cJ}~(J = 0, 1, 2)$ particles. Quarkonium systems, especially charm anti-charm states, are regarded as a unique laboratory to study the interplay between perturbative and nonperturbative effects in quantum chromodynamics (QCD). Experimental studies of charmonium decays can test QCD and QCD-based effective field theory calculations. The $\chi_{cJ}$ states belong to the charmonium $P$-wave spin triplet, and therefore cannot be produced via a single virtual-photon exchange in electron-positron annihilations as are the $J/\psi$ and $\psi (3686)$. Until now the understanding of these states has been limited by the availability of experimental data. The world’s largest data set of $\psi(3686)$ events [@psi'data] collected with the BESIII [@BES3] detector, provides a unique opportunity for detailed studies of $\chi_{cJ}$ decays, since they are copiously produced in $\psi (3686)$ radiative transitions with branching fractions of about 9$\%$ each [@PDG2016].
Many excited baryon states have been discovered by BaBar, Belle, CLEO, BESIII, and other experiments in the past decades [@PDG2016], but the overall picture of these states is still unclear. While many predicted states have not yet been observed, many states that do not agree with quark model predictions are observed (for a review see Ref. [@review]). Therefore the search for new excited baryon states is important to improve knowledge of the baryon spectrum and the understanding of the underlying processes which describe confinement in the nonperturbative QCD regime. Experimentally, exclusive decays of $\chi_{cJ}$ to baryon anti-baryon ($B\bar{B}$) pairs, such as $p\bar{p}$, $\Sigma\bar{\Sigma}$, $\Lambda \bar{\Lambda}$ [@ppbar; @lambda; @Sigma; @BB], have been investigated. However, there are only a few experimental studies of $\chi_{cJ}$ to $B\bar{B}M$ ($M$ stands for meson). These channels are ideal to search for new excited baryons in intermediate states, which decay into $\bar{B}M$ and $BM$.
This paper reports the first measurements of the branching fractions of $\chi_{cJ}\to\Sigma^{+}\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}+c.c.$ via the radiative transition $\psi(3686) \to \gamma\chi_{cJ}$, where $\Sigma^{+}\to p
\pi^{0}, K_{S}^{0}\to \pi^{+}\pi^{-}$, and $\pi^{0} \to
\gamma\gamma$. The charge-conjugate state ($c.c.$) is included unless otherwise stated. We also report on a search for possible excited baryon states in the invariant-mass spectra of $\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}$, and $\Sigma^{+}K_{S}^{0}$.
Detector and MC Simulation
==========================
The BESIII detector is a magnetic spectrometer located at the Beijing Electron Positron Collider (BEPCII) [@bepc]. The cylindrical core of the BESIII detector consists of a helium-based multilayer drift chamber (MDC), a plastic scintillator time-of-flight system (TOF), and a CsI (Tl) electromagnetic calorimeter (EMC), which are all enclosed in a superconducting solenoidal magnet providing a 1.0 T magnetic field. The solenoid is supported by an octagonal flux-return yoke with resistive plate counter muon identifier modules interleaved with steel. The acceptance of charged particles and photons is 93% over 4$\pi$ solid angle. The charged-particle momentum resolution at 1 GeV is 0.5%, and the $dE/dx$ resolution is 6% for the electrons from Bhabha scattering at 1 GeV. The EMC measures photon energies with a resolution of 2.5% (5%) at 1 GeV in the barrel (end-cap) region. The time resolution of the TOF barrel part is 68 ps, while that of the end-cap part is 110 ps.
This analysis is based on a sample of $(448.1\pm2.9)\times10^{6}$ $\psi(3686)$ events [@psi'data] collected with the BESIII detector.
-based [@GEANT] Monte Carlo (MC) simulation data are used to determine detector efficiency, optimize event selection, and estimate background contributions. Inclusive MC samples were produced to determine contributions from dominant background channels. The production of the initial $\psi(3686)$ resonance is simulated by the MC event generator [@kkmc; @kkmc2], and the known decay modes are modeled with [@evtgen; @evtgen2] using the branching fractions summarized and averaged by the Particle Data Group (PDG) [@PDG2016], while the remaining unknown decays are generated by [@lundcharm]. The final states are propagated through the detector system using software.
In addition, for the optimization of the selection criteria and the determination of the efficiency, exclusive MC data sets with $4\times10^5$ events are generated for each signal mode. Here, the $\psi(3686) \to \gamma\chi_{cJ}$ decay is generated assuming an E1 transition [@signalMC1; @signalMC2], where the photon polar angle $\theta$ in the $e^+e^-$ center-of-mass frame is distributed according to ($1+\lambda\cos^2\theta$). For $J$ = 0, 1, and 2, $\lambda$ is set to $1, -\frac{1}{3}$, and $\frac{1}{13}$, respectively. The decays $\chi_{cJ}\to\Sigma^{+}\bar{p}K_{S}^{0},\Sigma^{+}\to p \pi^{0},
K_{S}^{0}\to \pi^{+}\pi^{-},\pi^{0}\to \gamma\gamma $ are generated by using the phase-space model (PHSP).
Data analysis
=============
For the reaction channel $\psi(3686)\rightarrow \gamma\chi_{cJ}$, with $\chi_{cJ}\to\Sigma^{+}\bar{p}K_{S}^{0},\Sigma^{+}\to p \pi^{0},
\pi^{0}\to \gamma \gamma$, and $K_{S}^{0}\to \pi^{+}\pi^{-}$, the final-state particles are $p\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-\gamma\gamma\gamma$. Charged tracks must be in the active region of the MDC, corresponding to $|\cos\theta|<$ 0.93, where $\theta$ is the polar angle of the charged track with respect to the beam direction. For the anti-proton ($\bar{p}$), the point of closest approach to the interaction point (IP) must be within $\pm$1 cm in the plane perpendicular to the beam ($R_{xy}$) and $\pm$10 cm along the beam direction ($V_z$). Due to the long lifetime of the $K_{S}^{0}$ and $\Sigma^{+}$, there is no requirement on $R_{xy}$ or $V_z$ for the track candidates used to form the $K_{S}^{0}$ or $\Sigma^{+}$ candidates. Photon candidates are reconstructed by summing the energy deposition in the EMC crystals produced by the electromagnetic showers. The minimum energy necessary for counting a photon as a photon candidate is 25 MeV for barrel showers ($|\cos\theta|<0.8$) and 50 MeV for end-cap showers ($0.86<|\cos\theta|<0.92$). To eliminate showers originating from charged particles, a photon cluster must be separated by at least $10^\circ$ from any charged track. The timing of the shower is required to be within 700 ns from the reconstructed event start time to suppress noise and energy deposits unrelated to the event. Events with two positively charged tracks, two negatively charged tracks, and at least three good photons are selected for further analysis. The TOF (both end-cap and barrel) and $dE/dx$ measurements for each charged track are used to calculate the p-value based on the $\chi_{\rm PID}^2$ values for the hypotheses that a track is a pion, kaon, or proton. Two oppositely charged tracks are identified as a proton/anti-proton pair if their proton hypothesis p-values are greater than their kaon or pion hypothesis p-values. The remaining charged tracks are considered as pions by default. The numbers of protons and anti-protons as well as the negatively and positively charged pions should be equal to one.
The $K_{S}^{0}$ candidate is reconstructed with a pair of oppositely charged pions. To suppress events from combinatorial background contributions, we require that the $\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ pair is produced at a common vertex [@senvt].
Next a four-constraint (4C) kinematic fit imposing energy-momentum conservation is performed under the $p\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-\gamma\gamma\gamma$ hypothesis. If there are more than three photon candidates in an event, the combination with the smallest $\chi^{2}_{\rm 4C}$ is retained, and its $\chi^{2}_{\rm 4C}$ is required to be less than those for the $p\bar{p}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\gamma\gamma$ and $p\bar{p}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\gamma\gamma\gamma\gamma$ hypotheses. The value of $\chi^{2}_{\rm 4C}$ is required to be less than 50. For the selected signal candidates, the $\gamma\gamma$ combination ($\gamma_1\gamma_2$) with an invariant mass closest to the $\pi^{0}$ mass is reconstructed as $\pi^{0}$ candidate, and the remaining one ($\gamma_3$) is considered to be the radiative photon from the $\psi(3686)$ decay. The $\gamma\gamma$ invariant mass is required to satisfy $|M_{\gamma\gamma}-m_{\pi^{0}}|< 15 $ MeV/$c^{2}$. Here and throughout the text, $M_{i}$ represents a measured invariant mass and $m_{i}$ represents the nominal mass of the particle(s) $i$ [@PDG2016]. To reduce background events with $\bar{\Lambda}\rightarrow\bar{p}\pi^+$ , $|M_{\bar{p}\pi^+}-m_{\Lambda}|>6 $ MeV/$c^{2}$ is required. Figure \[2D\] shows the scatter plot of the $\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ invariant mass versus the $p\pi^{0}$ invariant mass of data. To select events which contain both a $K_{S}^{0}$ and a $\Sigma^+$ candidate, $|M_{\pi^{+}\pi^{-}}-m_{K_{S}^{0}}|<8$ MeV/$c^{2}$ and $|M_{p\pi^{0}}-m_{\Sigma^+}|<20$ MeV/$c^{2}$ are required ( black solid box in Fig. \[2D\]). The widths of the mass intervals are chosen to be 3 times the invariant-mass resolution.
-0.0cm -0.0cm
-0.0cm -0.0cm
The $\Sigma^{+}\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}$ invariant-mass distributions of the 937 events that passed all selection criteria and the MC simulated events are shown in Fig. \[chicJm\]. Clear signals are observed in the $\chi_{c0}$, $\chi_{c1}$, and $\chi_{c2}$ mass regions. The $\chi_{c0}$, $\chi_{c1}$, and $\chi_{c2}$ decays are defined as \[3.36, 3.46\], \[3.48, 3.54\], and \[3.54, 3.58\] GeV/$c^{2}$, respectively, as indicated with arrows in Fig. \[chicJm\].
A hint of a structure in the invariant-mass distribution of the $\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}$ subsystem in the $\chi_{c0}$ signal region can be seen in Fig. \[PKS\](a). Considering the width and mass, it is most likely the $\bar\Sigma(1940)^{-}$ with $M = 1940$ MeV/$c^2$, $\Gamma$ = 220 MeV, and $I(J^{P}) = 1
(\frac{3}{2}^-)$ [@PDG2016]. Other excited $\Sigma^*$ states are most likely excluded because their widths are much larger. For the fit to the invariant-mass distribution $M_{\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}}$, several contributions are considered, namely the line shape from the phase-space model, the normalized $K_{S}^{0}$ and $\Sigma^{+}$ mass sidebands in the $\chi_{c0}$ signal region (described in detail in the background analysis), and the $\bar\Sigma(1940)^{-}$ signal from the MC simulation, where the mass and width of $\bar\Sigma(1940)^{-}$ are fixed to the world average values [@PDG2016]. To estimate the statistical signal significance of the $\bar\Sigma(1940)^{-}$ contribution, we use the quantity $\sqrt{-2\ln(\mathcal{L}_0/\mathcal{L}_{\rm max})}$, where $\mathcal{L}_0$ and $\mathcal{L}_{\rm max}$ are the likelihoods of the fits without and with $\bar\Sigma(1940)^{-}$ signal, respectively. The statistical significance of the $\bar\Sigma(1940)^{-}$ signal is obtained to be $3.2\sigma$. The signal significance is reduced to $2.3\sigma$ if the width of $\bar\Sigma(1940)^{-}$ is taken as the lower value of 150 MeV [@PDG2016]. For all other invariant-mass distributions of the two-body subsystems, the description using the phase-space model is in good agreement with data. For example, the $\bar{p}K^{0}_{S}$ mass distributions from data and MC simulations in the $\chi_{c1}$ and $\chi_{c2}$ signal regions are shown in Figs. \[PKS\](b) and \[PKS\](c).
-0.0cm -10.0cm
Possible background contributions are studied with the inclusive MC sample of $5.06\times 10^8$ simulated $\psi(3686)$ decays. Peaking background contributions in the $\chi_{cJ}$ mass regions are dominated by the channels $\chi_{cJ} \rightarrow
\bar{\Delta}^{-}\pi^{+}\Delta^0 (\bar{\Delta}^{-} \rightarrow
\bar{p}\pi^{0}, \Delta^0 \rightarrow p \pi^{-})$ and $\chi_{cJ}
\rightarrow p \bar{p} \rho^{+} \pi^{-} (\rho^{+} \rightarrow \pi^{+}
\pi^{0})$. Other background events, mainly from the channels $\psi(3686) \rightarrow \Sigma^+ \bar{p} K^{*}(\Sigma^+ \rightarrow p
\pi^{0} , K^{*} \rightarrow K_{S}^{0} \pi^{0} , K^{0}_{S} \rightarrow
\pi^{+} \pi^{-})$, $\psi(3686) \rightarrow K_{S}^{0} \bar{\Delta}^-
\Sigma^+(\bar{\Delta}^- \rightarrow \bar{p} \pi^{0} , \Sigma^+
\rightarrow p \pi^{0} , K^{0}_{S} \rightarrow \pi^{+} \pi^{-}) $ and $\psi(3686) \rightarrow J/\psi \pi^{0} \pi^{0}(J/\psi \rightarrow p
\bar{\Delta}^0 \pi^{-} , \bar{\Delta}^0 \rightarrow \bar{p} \pi^{+} )
$ are not peaking in the $\chi_{cJ}$ mass regions. The amount of background events is estimated by using the normalized $K_{S}^{0}$ and $\Sigma^{+}$ mass sideband events, as shown in Fig. \[2D\]. The blue long dashed boxes are the selected $K_{S}^{0}$ mass sidebands ($1.1694<M_{p\pi^{0}}<1.2094$ GeV/$c^{2}$, $0.466
<M_{\pi^{+}\pi^{-}}<0.482$ GeV/$c^{2}$ and $0.514<M_{\pi^{+}\pi^{-}}<0.530$ GeV/$c^{2}$) and the $\Sigma^{+}$ mass sidebands ($0.49 <M_{K_{S}^{0}}<0.506$ GeV/$c^{2}$, $1.1094<M_{p\pi^{0}}<1.1494$ GeV/$c^{2}$ and $1.2294<M_{p\pi^{0}}<1.2694$ GeV/$c^{2}$), and the green dashed boxes are those from non-$K_{S}^{0}$ and non-$\Sigma^{+}$ sidebands ($1.1094<M_{p\pi^{0}}<1.1494$ GeV/$c^{2}$ and $1.2294<M_{p\pi^{0}}<1.2694$ GeV/$c^{2}$, $0.466
<M_{\pi^{+}\pi^{-}}<0.482$ GeV/$c^{2}$ and $0.514<M_{\pi^{+}\pi^{-}}<0.530$ GeV/$c^{2}$). The normalized background contribution in the $\chi_{cJ}$ mass regions is estimated as half of the total number of events in the four blue sideband regions minus one quarter of the total number of events in the four green sideband regions of Fig. \[2D\], and shown as a green-shaded histogram in Fig. \[fitchicJ\].
0.0cm 0.0cm
[chicJfit.eps]{}
An unbinned maximum-likelihood fit to the $\Sigma^+\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}$ invariant-mass distribution is performed for the total selected signal candidates, as shown in Fig. \[fitchicJ\]. The complete formula for the fit is $PDF_{\rm total} = N_1 \times PDF_{\rm signal}+ N_2 \times
PDF_{\rm peaking bkg}+ N_3 \times PDF_{\rm flat bkg}$. The parameters $N_1$ and $N_3$ are free, and $N_2$ is fixed to the number of the events determined from the $K_{S}^{0}$ and $\Sigma^{+}$ mass sidebands.
Here, $PDF_{\rm signal}$ is the sum of the signal line shapes of the three $\chi_{cJ}$ resonances each convolved with a Gaussian function related to the $\chi_{cJ}$ mass resolution, where the width of the Guassian function is fixed to each of the MC simulated value. The line shape of each resonance is described by: $$\begin{aligned}
PDF_{\rm signal, \chi_{cJ}} = BW(M)\times E_{\gamma}^{3}\times
D(E_{\gamma}),
\end{aligned}$$ where $M$ is the $\Sigma^+\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}$ invariant mass, $BW(M)=\frac{1}{(M-m_{\chi_{cJ}})^2+0.25\Gamma_{\chi_{cJ}}^2}$ is the Breit-Wigner function, with $m_{\chi_{cJ}}$ and $\Gamma_{\chi_{cJ}}$ the mass and width of the corresponding $\chi _{cJ}$, $E_{\gamma}=\frac{m_{\psi(3686)}^{2}-M^2}{2m_{\psi(3686)}}$ is the energy of the transition photon in the rest frame of $\psi(3686)$ and $D(E_{\gamma})$ is the damping factor which suppresses the divergent tail due to the $E_{\gamma}^{3}$ dependence of $PDF_{\rm signal}$. It is described by $\exp(-E_{\gamma}^{2}/8\beta^{2})$ where $\beta$ is one of the free parameters in the fit. For all three resonances the same $\beta$ value is required. The fit result $\beta=(68.7 \pm 13.0)$ MeV is consistent with the value measured by the CLEO experiment [@CLEO].
The peaking background component $PDF_{\rm peaking bkg}$ is the same as the signal distribution. It is used to describe the distribution of the normalized events from the $K_{S}^{0}$ and $\Sigma^{+}$ mass sidebands where clearly the three $\chi_{cJ}$ resonances can be identified. The $PDF_{\rm flat bkg}$ is described by a first-order polynomial.
For the unbinned maximum-likelihood fit, $\beta$, the masses and widths of the $\chi_{cJ}$ resonances, and the two coefficients of the polynomial are taken as free parameters. The event yields of the fitted $\chi_{cJ}\to \Sigma^{+}\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}$ signals are listed in Table \[result\].
Mode $N^{\chi_{cJ}}_{\rm obs}$ $\epsilon(\%)$ $\mathcal{B}(\chi_{cJ}\to \Sigma^{+}\bar{p}K_{S}^{0} )$
------------------------------------------- --------------------------- ------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------
$\chi_{c0}\to \Sigma^{+}\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}$ $493 \pm 26$ $9.05 \pm 0.05$ $ (3.52 \pm 0.19\pm 0.21)\times10^{-4}$
$\chi_{c1}\to \Sigma^{+}\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}$ $258 \pm 17$ $10.96 \pm 0.05$ $(1.53\pm 0.10\pm 0.08)\times10^{-4}$
$\chi_{c2}\to \Sigma^{+}\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}$ $129 \pm 13$ $10.40 \pm 0.05$ $(8.25\pm 0.83 \pm 0.49)\times10^{-5}$
The branching fractions for $\chi_{cJ}\to \Sigma^{+}\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}$ are calculated by $$\begin{aligned}
\mathcal{B}(\chi_{cJ} \to \Sigma^{+}\bar{p}K_{S}^{0} )
=\frac{N^{\chi_{cJ}}_{\rm obs}}{N_{\psi(3686)}\times\epsilon\times \prod_{j}\mathcal{B}_{j}},
\end{aligned}$$ where $N_{\psi(3686)}$ is the total number of $\psi(3686)$ events, $\epsilon$ is the corresponding detection efficiency as listed in Table \[result\], which is obtained by weighting the simulated Dalitz plot distribution with the distribution from data, and $\prod_{j}\mathcal{B}_{j} = \mathcal{B}(\psi(3686)\to
\gamma\chi_{cJ})\times\mathcal{B}(\Sigma^{+}\to p
\pi^{0})\times\mathcal{B}(K_{S}^{0}\to
\pi^{+}\pi^{-})\times\mathcal{B}(\pi^{0}\to\gamma\gamma)$, where the branching fractions are taken from the PDG [@PDG2016]. The results of the branching-fraction calculation for the decays $\chi_{cJ}\to
\Sigma^{+}\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}$ are also listed in Table \[result\] with statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Systematic Uncertainties
========================
The systematic uncertainties on the $\chi_{cJ}\to
\Sigma^{+}\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}$ branching-fraction measurements are listed in Table \[summary\_of\_syserr\].
The systematic uncertainty of the photon-detection efficiency is studied by considering the decay $J/\psi\to\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ [@photon] and is about 1% for each photon, so 3% is assigned for the three photons in the final states.
The uncertainty related to the particle identification (PID) and tracking of the proton and anti-proton is studied with the control samples of $J/\psi$ and $\psi(3686)\to p\bar{p}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$[@proton]. The average differences of efficiencies between MC simulations and data are 0.4%, 0.4%, and 0.3% for the proton from $\chi_{c0}$, $\chi_{c1}$, and $\chi_{c2}$ decays, respectively, with the transverse momentum and angle region of our signal channel considered. Similarly for $\bar{p}$, they are 0.4%, 0.3%, and 0.3%, respectively, so the uncertainties on the proton and anti-proton pair PID and tracking are 0.6$\%$, 0.5%, and 0.4% for $\chi_{c0}$, $\chi_{c1}$, and $\chi_{c2}$ decays, respectively.
The uncertainty associated with the 4C kinematic fit comes from the inconsistency between data and MC simulation, as described in detail in Ref. [@refsmear]. In this analysis, we take the efficiency with the correction as the nominal value, and the differences between the efficiencies with and without correction, 0.4%, 0.4%, and 0.3% for $\chi_{c0}$, $\chi_{c1}$, and $\chi_{c2}$, respectively, as the systematic uncertainties from the kinematic fit.
The uncertainty associated with the $K_S^{0}$ reconstruction is studied using $J/\psi \to K^{*}(892)^{\pm}K^{\mp}$, $K^{*}(892)^{\pm}\to K_S^{0}\pi^{\pm}$ and $J/\psi \to \phi
K_S^{0}K^{\pm}\pi^{\mp}$ control samples and is estimated to be 1.2% [@ksre].
The uncertainty related with the $\pi^{0}$ ($K_S^{0}$, $\Sigma^{+}$) mass window requirement is studied by fitting the $\pi^{0}$ ($K_S^{0}$, $\Sigma^{+}$) mass distributions of data and signal MC simulation with a free Crystal Ball (Gaussian, Gaussian) function and a first-order Chebyshev polynomial function. We obtained the selection efficiency of the $\pi^0$ ($K_S^{0}$, $\Sigma^{+}$) mass region, which is the ratio of the numbers of $\pi^0$ ($K_S^{0}$, $\Sigma^{+}$) events with and without the $\pi^0$ ($K_S^{0}$, $\Sigma^{+}$) mass window, determined by integrating the fitted signal shape. The difference in efficiency between data and MC simulation, $ 0.3\%$ ($ 0.3\%$, $ 0.1\%$), is assigned as the systematic uncertainty. The systematic uncertainty from the veto of the $\Lambda$ mass window is negligible due to the high detection efficiency.
The uncertainty of the detection efficiency is studied by changing the number of bins in the Dalitz plot. The maximum differences of the signal detection efficiency, 1.0%, 0.5% and 0.4% , are taken as uncertainties for $\chi_{c0}$, $\chi_{c1}$, and $\chi_{c2}$ decays, respectively. The uncertainty of assuming $\psi(3686)\to\gamma\chi_{c1}(\chi_{c2})$ as pure E1 transition is studied by considering the contribution from higher order multiple amplitudes [@M2] in the MC simulation, the differences of the efficiency, 0.8% for $\chi_{c1}$ and 0.2% for $\chi_{c2}$, are taken as the systematic uncertainties. For $\chi_{c0}\to
\Sigma^{+}\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}$, there is a possible structure in the $\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}$ invariant distribution. The corresponding systematic uncertainty is estimated by mixing $\chi_{c0}\to
\Sigma^{+}\bar{\Sigma}(1940)^{-}$ MC sample and the PHSP signal MC sample in a proportion, which is obtained from fitting $M_{\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}}$ distribution. The difference between the efficiencies before and after mixing, 0.1%, is considered to be the systematic uncertainty. The total uncertainties associated with the efficiency for $\chi_{c0}$, $\chi_{c1}$, and $\chi_{c2}$ are 1.0%, 0.9%, and 0.4%, respectively.
The systematic uncertainty due to the signal line shape is considered by changing the damping factor from $\exp(-E_\gamma^2/8\beta^2)$ to $\frac{E_{0}^{2}}{E_{0}E_{\gamma}+(E_{0}-E_{\gamma})^2}$ used by KEDR [@KEDR], where $E_{0}=\frac{m_{\psi(3686)}^{2}-m_{\chi_{cJ}^2}}{2m_{\psi(3686)}}$ is the peak energy of the transition photon, the differences in the fit results for $\chi_{c0}$, $\chi_{c1}$, and $\chi_{c2}$, 1.4%, 1.9%, and 0.4% are assigned as the systematic uncertainties.
The uncertainty associated with the detector resolution is studied by making the width of the Gaussion function to be free, no changes are found for the $\chi_{c0}$, $\chi_{c1}$, and $\chi_{c2}$ signal yields, thus these uncertainties are neglected.
The systematic uncertainties due to the $\chi_{c0}$, $\chi_{c1}$, and $\chi_{c2}$ mass and width in the fit are studied by changing them from free to the world average values [@PDG2016]. The differences of the $\chi_{c0}$, $\chi_{c1}$, and $\chi_{c2}$ signal yields, 3.0%, 0.4% and 3.9% are taken as the systematic uncertainties.
The uncertainty from the determination of $\chi_{cJ}$ signal events due to the fit range is obtained from the maximum difference in the fit results by changing the fit range from \[3.30, 3.60\] GeV/$c^{2}$ to \[3.30, 3.65\] GeV/$c^{2}$ or \[3.25, 3.60\] GeV/$c^{2}$. The maximum differences in the fitted yields for $\chi_{c0}$, $\chi_{c1}$, and $\chi_{c2}$ are 0.9%, 1.4%, and 0.8%, respectively.
The uncertainty due to the estimation of the background contribution using the $K_{S}^{0}$ and $\Sigma^{+}$ mass sidebands can be estimated by changing the sideband ranges. Changing the mass range of $ K^{0}_{S}$ from \[0.466, 0.482\], \[0.514, 0.530\] GeV/$c^{2}$ to \[0.464, 0.480\], \[0.516, 0.532\] GeV/$c^{2}$, and the mass range of $\Sigma^+$ from \[1.1094, 1.1494\], \[1.2294, 1.2694\] GeV/$c^{2}$ to \[1.1074, 1.1474\], \[1.2314, 1.2714\] GeV/$c^{2}$, and varying the non-$K_{S}^{0}$, non-$\Sigma^{+}$ mass region accordingly, the differences of $\chi_{c0}$, $\chi_{c1}$, and $\chi_{c2}$ signal yields are 0.3%, 0.1%, and 0.5%, respectively. The uncertainty from the shape of the non-$\chi_{cJ}$ background is estimated by changing the polynomial degree from the first to the second in fitting the $\Sigma^+\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}$ invariant mass, and the differences in the fit results are 2.8%, 1.4%, and 1.4%, respectively. The total uncertainties associated with the background shape are 2.8%, 1.4%, and 1.5% for $\chi_{c0}$, $\chi_{c1}$, and $\chi_{c2}$ decays, respectively.
The systematic uncertainties due to the secondary branching fractions of $\psi(3686) \to \gamma\chi_{c0}~(\chi_{c1}, ~\chi_{c2}),~\Sigma^{+}\to p \pi^{0},~K_{S}^{0}\to \pi^{+}\pi^{-}$, and $\pi^{0}\to\gamma\gamma$ are 2.0% (2.5%, 2.1%), 0.6%, 0.07% , and 0.03% [@PDG2016] respectively. Therefore, the uncertainties of the secondary branching fractions are 2.1%, 2.6% and 2.2% for $\chi_{c0}$, $\chi_{c1}$, and $\chi_{c2}$ decays, respectively.
The number of $\psi(3686)$ events is determined to be $(448.1\pm2.9)\times 10^6$ by counting inclusive hadronic events from $\psi(3686)$ decays [@psi'data], thus the uncertainty is about 0.6%.
The total systematic uncertainty is the sum in quadrature of all uncertainties added for each $\chi_{cJ}$ decay.
Source $\mathcal{B}(\chi_{c0} ) $ $\mathcal{B}(\chi_{c1} )$ $\mathcal{B}(\chi_{c2} )$
------------------------------- ---------------------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
Photon detection 3.0 3.0 3.0
PID and tracking 0.6 0.5 0.4
4C kinematic fit 0.4 0.4 0.3
$K_{S}^{0}$ reconstruction 1.2 1.2 1.2
$\pi^{0}$ mass window 0.3 0.3 0.3
$K_{S}^{0}$ mass window 0.3 0.3 0.3
$\Sigma^{+}$ mass window 0.1 0.1 0.1
Efficiency 1.0 0.9 0.4
Signal line shape 1.4 1.9 0.4
Mass and width of $\chi_{cJ}$ 3.0 0.4 3.9
Fit range 0.9 1.4 0.8
Background shape 2.8 1.4 1.5
Intermediate decay 2.1 2.6 2.2
Number of $\psi(3686)$ 0.6 0.6 0.6
Total 6.0 5.2 5.9
Summary
=======
Using the $(448.1 \pm 2.9)\times$10$^{6}$ $\psi(3686)$ events accumulated with the BESIII detector, the study of $\chi_{cJ}\to
\Sigma^{+}\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}~(J = 0, 1, 2)$ is performed for the first time, and clear $\chi_{cJ}$ signals are observed. The branching fractions of $\chi_{cJ}\to \Sigma^{+}\bar{p}K_{S}^{0}$ are determined to be $(3.52 \pm 0.19\pm 0.21)\times10^{-4}$, $(1.53\pm 0.10\pm
0.08)\times10^{-4}$, and $(8.25 \pm 0.83 \pm 0.49)\times10^{-5}$ for $J=0$, 1, and 2, respectively, where the first and second uncertainty are the statistical and systematic ones, respectively. Due to the limited statistics, no evident structure is observed in the invariant mass of any subsystem.
The BESIII collaboration thanks the staff of BEPCII and the IHEP computing center for their strong support. This work is supported in part by National Key Basic Research Program of China under Contract No. 2015CB856700; National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Contracts Nos. 11625523, 11635010, 11735014, 11822506, 11835012; the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Large-Scale Scientific Facility Program; Joint Large-Scale Scientific Facility Funds of the NSFC and CAS under Contracts Nos. U1532257, U1532258, U1732263, U1832207; CAS Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences under Contracts Nos. QYZDJ-SSW-SLH003, QYZDJ-SSW-SLH040; 100 Talents Program of CAS; INPAC and Shanghai Key Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology; ERC under Contract No. 758462; German Research Foundation DFG under Contracts Nos. Collaborative Research Center CRC 1044, FOR 2359; Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Italy; Ministry of Development of Turkey under Contract No. DPT2006K-120470; National Science and Technology fund; STFC (United Kingdom); The Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (Sweden) under Contract No. 2016.0157; The Royal Society, UK under Contracts Nos. DH140054, DH160214; The Swedish Research Council; U. S. Department of Energy under Contracts Nos. DE-FG02-05ER41374, DE-SC-0010118, DE-SC-0012069; University of Groningen (RuG) and the Helmholtzzentrum fuer Schwerionenforschung GmbH (GSI), Darmstadt.
[9]{} M. Ablikim [*et al.*]{} (BESIII Collaboration), Chin. Phys. C [**42**]{}, 023001 (2018). M. Ablikim [*et al.*]{} (BESIII Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A [**614**]{}, 345 (2010). M. Tanabashi [*et al.*]{} (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D [**98**]{}, 030001 (2018).
S. Capstick and W. Roberts, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. [**45**]{}, S241 (2000). M. Ablikim [*et al.*]{} (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D [**88**]{}, 112001 (2013). M. Ablikim [*et al.*]{} (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D [**87**]{}, 032007 (2013). M. Ablikim [*et al.*]{} (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D [**97**]{}, 052011 (2018). P. Naik [*et al.*]{} (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D [**78**]{}, 031101 (2008).
C. H. Yu [*et al.*]{}, Proceedings of IPAC [**2016**]{} (2016). S. Agostinelli [*et al.*]{} (GEANT4 Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A [**506**]{}, 250 (2003). S. Jadach, B. F. L. Ward, and Z. Was, Comput. Phys. Commun. [**130**]{}, 260 (2000). S. Jadach, B. F. L. Ward, and Z. Was, Phys. Rev. D [**63**]{}, 113009 (2001). R. G. Ping, Chin. Phys. C [**32**]{}, 599 (2008). D. J. Lange, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A [**462**]{}, 152 (2001). J. C. Chen, G. S. Huang, X. R. Qi, D. H. Zhang, and Y. S. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D [**62**]{}, 034003 (2000).
W. M. Tanenbaum [*et al.*]{}, Phys. Rev. D [**17**]{}, 1731 (1978). G. R. Liao, R. G. Ping, and Y. X. Yang, Chin. Phys. Lett. [**26**]{}, 051101 (2009). M. Xu [*et al.*]{}, Chin. Phys. C [**33**]{}, 428 (2009). R. E. Mitchell [*et al.*]{} (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. [**102**]{}, 011801 (2009).
M. Ablikim [*et al.*]{} (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D [**92**]{}, 052003 (2015). M. Ablikim [*et al.*]{} (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D [**99**]{}, 032006 (2019).
M. Ablikim [*et al.*]{} (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D [**87**]{}, 012002 (2013).
, Phys. Rev. D [**92**]{}, 112008 (2015). , Phys. Rev. D [**95**]{}, 072004 (2017). V. V. Anashin [*et al.*]{} (KEDR Collaboration), Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser. [**02**]{}, 188 (2011).
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We present CO(1-0) and [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}(21-cm) observations of the central region of the wet merger remnant NGC 34. The Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave Astronomy (CARMA) observations detect a regularly rotating disk in CO with a diameter of 2.1 kpc and a total molecular hydrogen mass of ($2.1 \pm 0.2) \times10^9~M_\odot$. The rotation curve of this gas disk rises steeply, reaching maximum velocities at $1\arcsec\ $(410 pc) from the center. Interestingly, [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}observations done with the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array show that the absorption against the central continuum has the exact same velocity range as the CO in emission. This strongly suggests that the absorbing [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}also lies within $1\arcsec$ from the center, is mixed in and corotates with the molecular gas. A comparison of [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}absorption profiles taken at different resolutions ($5\arcsec-45\arcsec$) shows that the spectra at lower resolutions are less deep at the systemic velocity. This provides evidence for [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}emission in the larger beams, covering the region from 1 kpc to 9 kpc from the center. The central rapidly rotating disk was likely formed either during the merger or from fall-back material. Lastly, the radio continuum flux of the central source at mm wavelengths ($5.4\pm1.8$ mJy) is significantly higher than expected from an extrapolation of the synchrotron spectrum, indicating the contribution of thermal free-free emission from the central starburst.'
author:
- 'Ximena Fernández, A.O. Petric, François Schweizer, J.H. van Gorkom'
title: 'Discovery of a Small Central Disk of CO and [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}in the Merger Remnant NGC 34 '
---
Introduction
============
Gas-rich mergers are key to understanding the hierarchical growth and evolution of galaxies [@White78]. Much progress has been made to understand the overall role of mergers in the formation of early-type galaxies, and it is now accepted that many are a product of gas-rich mergers [e.g., @Schweizer98]. There are still some uncertainties on how exactly the transformation takes place, especially how a gas-rich system ultimately rids itself of gas. These details are what possibly dictate whether the merger remnant becomes an elliptical or whether a new disk forms, as seen in some observations and simulations of gas rich mergers [@DS13; @Barnes02]. The possible presence of a starburst or AGN further complicates the picture. While gas can fuel both starbursts and AGNs, these phenomena may cause outflows and remove the gas from the inner parts. It is thus important to study the gas in the central regions of mergers in its molecular and atomic phases to help predict the ultimate fate of the system.
NGC 34 ($=$ NGC 17 $=$ Mrk 938) is an ideal candidate to study these processes since it is gas-rich and hosts both a starburst and an AGN. Throughout the paper, we adopt a distance of 85.2 Mpc, derived for $H_0 = 70$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ by @SS07 [hereafter SS07]. The infrared luminosity of this object is $\log (L_{IR}/L_{\odot})=11.61$ [@Chini92], placing it in mid-range of the classically defined Luminous Infrared Galaxies (LIRGs; $11.0 < \log L_{IR}/L_{\odot} < 12.0$; [@Soifer87]). In general, high IR luminosities are due to dust grains being heated by a combination of starburst and AGN, with higher values indicating a greater AGN contribution [@SandersMirabel96]. The IR luminosity of NGC 34 suggests that the starburst is the dominant phenomenon in the center, with a minor AGN component [@Goncalves99; @Prouton04]. This has been confirmed by a detailed study of NGC 34’s IR spectrum done by @Esquej12, where the AGN bolometric contribution to the total infrared luminosity is estimated to be $2_{-1}^{+2}\%$. In addition, the IR images show that the starburst takes place in the inner $0.5-2$ kpc of the merger remnant. These authors find, however, that the presence of an AGN is needed to explain the hard X-ray luminosity.
An optical study by SS07 showed that NGC 34 is the likely product of an unequal-mass merger, with a rich system of young globular clusters. Deep optical images show two long tidal tails and structures such as ripples, jets, and shells, all typical of merger remnants [@Schweizer98]. In addition to this, the surface-brightness profiles in $B$, $V$, and $I$ indicate the presence of a blue exponential stellar disk with a scale length of $a=3.3$ kpc, possibly formed from gas falling back into the merger remnant. The optical spectrum features a blueshifted Na I D doublet in absorption, indicative of a mean gas outflow velocity of $-620 \pm 60$ km s$^{-1}$ and a maximum velocity of $-1050 \pm 30$ km s$^{-1}$.
Earlier, we performed a first imaging study of the [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}and radio continuum to better understand the fate of cold gas during the merger [@Fernandez10 hereafter Radio I]. We detected $7.2 \times 10^9~M_\odot$ of [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}gas, which is mostly distributed along the tails, and saw evidence for gas settling onto the blue exponential disk found by SS07. The most puzzling part of our study was the detection of a strong [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}absorption feature of $\sim 500$ km s$^{-1}$ width at the systemic velocity, covering both blueshifted and redshifted velocities and seen against the strong unresolved central continuum source of 62.4 mJy. We presented two possible scenarios to explain the puzzling absorption: either we were probing an [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}disk in absorption against an extended continuum source so that we saw both the blue and redshifted part in absorption, or we were seeing gas associated with the tidal tails in projection against the continuum.
In this follow-up radio study, we present new CO imaging and [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}absorption observations obtained at higher angular resolution and with a wider velocity coverage. We seek to determine which of the above two scenarios explains the puzzling absorption better by comparing the distribution and kinematics of the CO to the [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}absorption data. In addition, the new continuum observations at mm-wavelengths allow us to probe the spectral index at high frequencies. Lastly, both sets of new observations have a much wider velocity coverage, enabling us to search for an atomic or molecular counterpart to the outflow seen optically.
The structure of the paper is as follows. We summarize the observations and data reduction in Section 2, present our results in Section 3, discuss what we have learned from these observations in Section 4, and put forth our conclusions in Section 5.
Observations and Data Reduction
===============================
CARMA Observations
------------------
NGC 34 was observed in the CO $J=1-0$ transition at 115.2712 GHz with the Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave Astronomy (CARMA) in May 2011. The observations were done in two configurations: in D array for 4.1 hours on source and in C array for 5.8 hours. The spacings for these two arrays are $11-150$m and $30-350$m, respectively. The primary flux calibrator was Uranus, and 3C454.3 was used as the passband calibrator. Both sets of observations used a 1 GHz bandwidth centered at 113.11 GHz, corresponding to the central frequency of the single-dish observations. This translates to a heliocentric velocity of 5731 km s$^{-1}$, using the optical definition. This setup results in a velocity coverage of 2980 km s$^{-1}$, starting at 4238 km s$^{-1}$ and ending at 7218 km s$^{-1}$, with 150 channels with a velocity resolution of $~20$ km s$^{-1}$.
The data were reduced with the software package Multichannel Image Reconstruction Image Analysis and Display (MIRIAD) using standard calibration procedures for each configuration [@miriad]. For each band, we flagged the first and last 2 channels due to poor sensitivity at the edge of the band. The phase stability was inspected and poor data were flagged for each track. The C and D array calibrated visibilities were then combined and the continuum was estimated from 696 (unsmoothed) signal free channels. The deconvolution task uses a Steer CLEAN algorithm [@CLEAN], and we selected natural weighting (robustness parameter set to 2) to maximize the sensitivity to broad, faint structures. The final combined data cube has a synthesized beam of $2.48\arcsec \times 2.14\arcsec$ ($\sim 1$ kpc) at FWHM and a noise of 8.4 mJy beam$^{-1}$.
[ccc]{}
Flux Calibrator & Uranus& 3C48\
Phase Calibrator & 3C454.3 & J2357-1125\
Number of Channels & 150 & 256\
Bandwidth (MHz) & 1000 & 32\
Synthesized Beam & $2.48\arcsec \times 2.14\arcsec$ & $8.31\arcsec \times 4.46 \arcsec$\
Field of View &$1-1.7\arcmin$ &$32\arcmin$\
Velocity Coverage & 3000 & 7000\
[(km s$^{-1}$)]{} & &\
Velocity Resolution & 20 & 27\
(km s$^{-1}$) & &\
Noise & 8.4 & 0.21\
(mJy beam$^{-1}$chan$^{-1}$) & &\
Column density sensitivity & $1.1\times10^{20}$($H_2$) & $1.7\times10^{20}$\
(cm$^{-2}$ chan$^{-1}$) & &
VLA Observations
----------------
NGC 34 was observed with the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA)[^1] in April 2011 in the B array configuration (spacings of $0.21-11.1$km) during two runs for a total observing time of 7 hours. The observations used a 32 MHz bandwidth centered at the heliocentric velocity of 5870 km s$^{-1}$, with a total of 256 channels with a resolution of $~27$ km s$^{-1}$. This results in a velocity coverage of 7000 km s$^{-1}$, from 2426 km s$^{-1}$ to 9421 km s$^{-1}$.
Each run was reduced with the Astronomical Imaging Processing System (AIPS) using standard calibration procedures. The data were combined in the *uv* plane, and then several iterations of self-calibration were performed to correct for amplitude and phase errors. We first made a continuum image by averaging 80 line-free channels, using a robustness parameter of 1 and setting CLEAN boxes around the point source. This image served as the initial input model for the first run of phase self-calibration. After each run, we made a new input model by imaging the continuum applying the new solutions for subsequent self-calibration runs. After three runs of phase self-calibration and one of amplitude, we achieved a dynamic range of about 760:1 and an rms sensitivity of 0.07 mJy beam$^{-1}$. We then applied the solutions to the whole data set, and subtracted the continuum in the *uv* plane by making a linear fit through the line-free channels. The [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}cube was made using a robustness parameter of 1, and cleaning the channels containing [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}absorption. The resulting images have an rms noise of 0.2 mJy beam$^{-1}$ and a synthesized beam of $8.31\arcsec \times 4.46\arcsec$ ($\sim 3.5 \times 2$ kpc).
Table 1 summarizes all parameters used for the CARMA and VLA observations.
Results
=======
A Central Disk of CO
--------------------
The CO observations reveal a disk of molecular gas in the central regions of the remnant. Figure 1 is composed of various panels showing the gas distribution and kinematics. This CO disk lies at the center of NGC 34 and is much smaller than the optical disk (Figure 1a). It shows a regular rotation pattern as seen in Figures 1d and 1e. There are hints of extended emission towards the northwest, northeast, and south (Figure 1b). We estimate a diameter of 2.1 kpc by measuring the extent of the emission enclosed by the second lowest density contour, which corresponds to 4.31 Jy km s$^{-1}$ beam$^{-1}$.
We calculate the CO luminosity with the following equation [@Solomon97]: $$L_{CO}=3.25\times10^7~Sdv~\nu_{obs}^{-2} D_L^2(1+z)^{-3} ,$$ where $Sdv$ is the integrated CO flux in units of Jy km s$^{-1}$, $\nu_{obs}$ is the observed frequency in GHz, and $D_L$ is the luminosity distance in Mpc. We compute the CO flux using channel maps and get a value of $151.9~ \pm ~11.3$ Jy km s$^{-1}$, which results in a CO luminosity of $(2.6 \pm 0.2)\times10^{9}$ K km s$^{-1}$ pc$^{-2}$. We multiply this value by $\alpha_{CO}$ to get a molecular hydrogen mass in solar masses ($M_\odot$). Here we use $\alpha=0.8$, which is the standard conversion factor for starbursting systems [@DownesSolomon98], and get an H$_2$ mass of $2.1 \pm 0.2 \times
10^9~M_\odot$.
Single-dish CO(1–0) data [@Kandalyan03; @Chini92; @Krugel90] yield a flux of $170 \pm 12$ Jy km s$^{-1}$, which is 12% higher than what we detect. This is a marginal difference, but—if significant—it might be indicating that our observations miss an extended component of the CO disk. This component is hinted at by the weak extensions seen in Figure 1b, suggesting that observing with shorter spacings could have detected this more extended gas.
As seen in the spectrum of Figure 1c, the CO emission spans close to 500 km s$^{-1}$. The intensity-weighted velocity field (Figure 1d) and the position-velocity (PV) diagram (Figure 1e) along the major axis of the optical disk (PA $-9^\circ$; SS07) show that the kinematics are consistent with rotation, with the north side of the disk receding, and the south side approaching. The extended emission features mentioned above have velocities consistent with the gas in the main body of the disk, suggesting they are real and possibly part of a fainter component not detected in our observations. The PV diagram demonstrates that the rotation curve rises very steeply, reaching peak velocities within $1\arcsec$ from the center, and showing a slight decrease towards the edges.
$\begin{array}{c}
\includegraphics[trim= 2 12 5 30,clip,scale=0.4]{Fig2a.eps}\\
\includegraphics[trim= 0 12 5 30,clip,scale=0.4]{Fig2b.eps}\\
\includegraphics[trim= 2 12 5 30,clip,scale=0.4]{Fig2c.eps}\\
\end{array}
$
High Resolution [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}Absorption
------------------------------------------
Our new VLA B-array observations probe the previously known [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}absorption feature (Radio I) with a wider velocity coverage and at higher resolution. Figure 2 consists of three panels showing these observations, including a comparison to the absorption profiles presented in Radio I, and to the CO observations in emission presented in Section 3.1. The top panel represents the [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}absorption feature seen against the peak of the continuum emission and showing the full velocity coverage of 2426–9421 km s$^{-1}$, with no hint of absorption seen at the outflow velocity ($\sim$5000 km s$^{-1}$) detected by SS07 (see next section).
The second panel compares these higher resolution (2 kpc) data to the previous [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}observations in the DnC (18 kpc) and CnB (6 kpc) configurations. Note that the depth of absorption is similar in the three configurations at the extreme velocities around 5600 km s$^{-1}$ and 6000 km s$^{-1}$, but is very different near the systemic velocity of 5870 km s$^{-1}$. A deep feature is seen in B array at this velocity, which is shallower in C and nearly absent at some velocities in D. We can understand this as follows: Since the continuum source is unresolved in B array, we see a combination of absorption against the continuum source plus emission further out within the central beam in C and D array. We can estimate how much emission there is on different scales by looking at the difference in the absorption profiles. We do this by summing the difference between the two profiles at different resolutions for each velocity bin to get a flux. As shown in Radio I, there is $7.3 \times 10^8~M_\odot$ of [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}in emission between the inner 6 and 18 kpc of the remnant. Now we can determine how much [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}in emission there is between the inner 2 and 6 kpc by comparing the CnB and the B array data. We calculate an [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}mass of $2.5 \times
10^8~M_\odot$ in the velocity interval $5700-6000$ km s$^{-1}$. Since the two data sets have different velocity resolutions, we created velocity bins of 50 km s$^{-1}$ and then averaged the values that were in a given bin.
The bottom panel compares the range of velocities seen in the [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}absorption and the CO emission. The plot shows that the velocity ranges for the emission and the absorption are almost identical. The range covered for the [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}absorption profile is $466 \pm 27$ km s$^{-1}$ and for the CO profile is $460 \pm 20$ km s$^{-1}$, as measured at the profile base. This remarkable agreement in velocity range makes it plausible that the [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}and CO emissions arise from the same central gas disk, imaged in CO at $2.48\arcsec \times 2.14\arcsec$ resolution (Figs 1b and 1d). In addition, it implies that the [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}is intermixed with the molecular gas and that it also reaches maximum velocities within $\sim1\arcsec$ ($0.4$ kpc) from the center.
Molecular and Atomic Gas Outflow
--------------------------------
We can use the current observations to search for a counterpart in [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}and/or CO(1–0) to the outflow detected by SS07 in the NaD I doublet. We do not detect the outflow in either line, but can place upper limits. We calculate the noise near the central regions of NGC 34 and around $\sim$5000 km s$^{-1}$, consistent with the velocities of the optical outflow. We use the following equation to get a mass outflow rate upper limit [@Heckman00; @Rupke02] for both [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}absorption and emission: $$\begin{gathered}
\dot{M}(H)=21\left(\frac{\Omega}{4\pi}\right)C_f\left(\frac{r_*}{1 ~ \rm kpc}\right)\left(\frac{N(H)}{10^{21}~ \rm cm^{-2}}\right)\\\times\left(\frac{\Delta v}{200 \rm~ km~ s^{-1}}\right)
M_{\odot}~\rm yr^{-1} ,\end{gathered}$$ where $\Omega$ is the solid angle subtended by the outflow, $C_f$ is the line-of-sight covering fraction, $r_*$ is the size of the region from where the outflow is produced, $N(H)$ is the column density, and $\Delta v$ is the velocity of the outflow. For the first three quantities, we assume $\Omega=4\pi$, $C_f=0.5$, and $r_*$= 1 kpc, which are values consistent with outflows seen in LIRGs [@Rupke02]. For the absorption, we calculate the [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}column density assuming 5$\sigma$ and get $4.2\times10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$ (assuming $T_s=100$ K). Lastly, we take $\Delta v=620$ km s$^{-1}$, which is the mean velocity of the outflow detected by SS07. The resulting upper limit for the mass outflow rate is 14 $M_{\odot}~\rm yr^{-1}$ in absorption. Using the same values, but now calculating N([[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}) in emission, the upper limit is about 130 $M_{\odot}~\rm yr^{-1}$. This large number is a consequence of the poor surface brightness sensitivity in B array.
>From the CO emission, we can calculate an upper limit for the outflow rate by dividing the molecular mass by the dynamical timescale [e.g., @Alatalo11]. We compute an upper limit for the molecular-gas mass using 5$\sigma$ and the velocity of the optical outflow, resulting in $6.2 \times 10^7~M_\odot$. We can estimate the dynamical time by assuming a size of 1 kpc for the wind emitting region and the optical velocity, which results in a timescale of only 1.6 Myr. These two values yield an upper limit for the CO mass outflow rate of about 40 $M_{\odot}~\rm yr^{-1}$.
Central continuum
-----------------
This study includes new continuum images of the central components of the merger remnant. The VLA B-array observations show a slightly resolved point source with a flux of $60.6 \pm 2.0$ mJy, consistent with the measurement presented in Radio I.
The CARMA observations reveal a faint central continuum source at millimeter wavelengths with a flux of $5.4 \pm 1.8$ mJy. This measurement allows us to probe the spectral index at high frequencies. At low frequencies ($1-10$ GHz), the spectrum for star-forming galaxies is usually dominated by synchrotron radiation, with typical values of $\alpha=-0.8$. At higher frequencies ($10-200$ GHz), free-free emission starts to dominate and the spectral index is $\alpha=-0.1$. Dust emission takes over at frequencies above 200 MHz with $\alpha=1.5$ [@Condon92].
Figure 3 shows the radio spectrum for NGC 34 between 1.4 GHz and 113.11 GHz. The first four values in the range of $1.4 - 22.5$ GHz were reported by @Clemens08, and the one at 113.11 GHz is the measurement presented here. We fit a line through the first four measurements and extend it to 113.11 GHz to better show that the spectrum flattens at higher frequencies. The fit of the line yields a slope of $-0.8$, indicating that the emission at these frequencies is due to synchrotron radiation. The spectral index between 22.5 GHz and 113.11 GHz is $\alpha=-0.20\pm0.07$. The flattening of the spectrum at higher frequencies shows that synchrotron emission is no longer dominant, and free-free emission from H regions takes over.
Discussion
==========
The Gaseous Disk in the Inner Regions of the Remnant
----------------------------------------------------
Our CO observations confirm the presence of a disk in the inner regions of the remnant, which was one of the two scenarios suggested in Radio I to explain the [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}absorption observations. The match in velocities for both sets of observations (Fig. 2) strongly suggests that the central [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}absorption is due to the presence of a rotating disk. As shown in the PV diagram of Figure 1e, the maximum velocities are reached within only 1$\arcsec$ (0.4 kpc) from the center. The close match in velocity between the molecular gas and [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}absorption argues that the absorbing gas also reaches maximum velocities within 0.4 kpc from the center. This is consistent with higher-resolution continuum images by @Condon91 that resolve the central source and show it to be a dominant central component with an extension to the south, with a total size of 2.5$\arcsec$ (1 kpc). This extended continuum makes it possible to trace out the [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}absorption to its maximum velocity at $1\arcsec$ from the center.
The question now is whether any of the continuum emission could be due to the AGN. Several recent studies have calculated the AGN contribution to be small ($1-10\%$) in NGC 34 [e.g., @Vega08; @Esquej12; @Murphy13]. In addition to this, VLBI observations report a single-baseline detection [@Lonsdale93], which suggests that this merger remnant does not host a strong point source due to the AGN, and its continuum is likely dominated by the starburst.
The Fate of Gas in the Merger
-----------------------------
The optical study by SS07 and the radio observations presented here and in Radio I have shown different components of the new disk formed after the merger. SS07 find a blue stellar disk, with spiral structure extending out to a radius of $\sim$3.3 kpc, that seems to have formed $\sim$400 Myr ago and is embedded in a red spheroid. In Radio I, we found that the [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}from the northern tidal tail is falling back and continuing to feed the outer regions of this optical disk, favoring the idea of inside-out growth. On smaller scales, we have shown in this study that there is a central disk of CO and [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}of about 2.1 kpc in diameter. In addition, we find evidence for more extended [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}emission further out as shown by the comparison of the absorption profiles at different resolutions.
Observations and simulations of mergers suggest that about 50% of the gas gets quickly moved to the central regions, losing its angular momentum due to cloud-cloud collisions, while the other 50% gets moved to large distances from the center, but remains bound and will eventually fall back [@Hibbard95; @Hibbard96; @Barnes02]. In NGC 34 we see evidence for both processes, and at the present time there are comparable amounts of cold gas in the tidal tails and the center. We know the blue stellar disk formed $\sim$400 Myr ago from gas settling toward the center during the merger. The central gaseous disk presented here could have formed during the merger or more recently from fall-back material. The major axes of the gaseous disk and the blue stellar disk have almost identical position angles, indicating that the two disks either have the same formation mechanism or are dynamically linked. The current SFR in the inner 2 kpc calculated by @Esquej12 from the 24$\micron$ luminosity is 42 M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$, which implies a consumption timescale of $\sim50$ Myr for the molecular hydrogen presented here. This indicates that the gas in the central disk must be continuously replenished to sustain the current star formation rate.
Lastly, both sets of observations have enough velocity coverage to permit searching for a possible radio counterpart to the outflow seen optically in Na D I absorption by SS07. However, we do not find any evidence for such a counterpart in the atomic- or molecular-gas phase. We are able to place approximate upper limits on the HI mass outflow rate in both emission and absorption, and for the CO in emission.
Summary and Conclusions
=======================
We have presented new high-resolution HI and CO observations to study the central regions of the merger remnant NGC 34. Our main findings are as follows:
- We detect a rotating CO disk of 2.1 kpc in diameter with a molecular-hydrogen mass of $(2.1\pm 0.2)\times 10^9~M_\odot$.
- The velocity width of the CO(1–0) emitting gas matches the [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{} absorption width, indicating that the broad [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}absorption is due to the central gas disk and is co-spatial with the CO.
- The new B-array observations of the [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}absorption feature allow us to calculate that there is $2.5 \times 10^8~M_\odot$ of [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}in the annular region of $1-3$ kpc from the center.
- We do not detect a molecular- or atomic-gas outflow, but place upper limits on the mass outflow rates for [[H[ I ]{}]{}]{}in emission and absorption, and for CO in emission.
- We have obtained new continuum images of the central source at 1.4 GHz and 113 GHz. We find that the spectrum flattens at the highest frequencies to a spectral index of $\alpha=-0.20\pm0.07$. This indicates that the radio continuum at those frequencies is due to free–free emission from the central starburst.
Support for CARMA construction was derived from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, the Kenneth T. and Eileen L. Norris Foundation, the James S. McDonnell Foundation, the Associates of the California Institute of Technology, the University of Chicago, the states of California, Illinois, and Maryland, and the National Science Foundation. Ongoing CARMA development and operations are supported by the National Science Foundation under a cooperative agreement, and by the CARMA partner universities. This work was partially supported by NSF grant No. 1009476 to Columbia University.
[29]{} natexlab\#1[\#1]{}
, K., [et al.]{} 2011, , 735, 88
, J. E. 2002, , 333, 481
, R., [Kruegel]{}, E., & [Steppe]{}, H. 1992, , 255, 87
, M. S., [Vega]{}, O., [Bressan]{}, A., [Granato]{}, G. L., [Silva]{}, L., & [Panuzzo]{}, P. 2008, , 477, 95
, J. J. 1992, , 30, 575
, J. J., [Huang]{}, Z.-P., [Yin]{}, Q. F., & [Thuan]{}, T. X. 1991, , 378, 65
, D., & [Solomon]{}, P. M. 1998, , 507, 615
, P., [et al.]{} 2012, , 423, 185
, X., [van Gorkom]{}, J. H., [Schweizer]{}, F., & [Barnes]{}, J. E. 2010, , 140, 1965
, A. C., [V[é]{}ron-Cetty]{}, M.-P., & [V[é]{}ron]{}, P. 1999, , 135, 437
, T. M., [Lehnert]{}, M. D., [Strickland]{}, D. K., & [Armus]{}, L. 2000, , 129, 493
, J. E., & [Mihos]{}, J. C. 1995, , 110, 140
, J. E., & [van Gorkom]{}, J. H. 1996, , 111, 655
, R. A. 2003, , 398, 493
, E., [Chini]{}, R., & [Steppe]{}, H. 1990, , 229, 17
, C. J., [Smith]{}, H. J., & [Lonsdale]{}, C. J. 1993, , 405, L9
, E. J. 2013, ArXiv e-prints
, O. R., [Bressan]{}, A., [Clemens]{}, M., [Franceschini]{}, A., [Granato]{}, G. L., & [Silva]{}, L. 2004, , 421, 115
, D. S., [Veilleux]{}, S., & [Sanders]{}, D. B. 2002, , 570, 588
, D. B., & [Mirabel]{}, I. F. 1996, , 34, 749
, R. J., [Teuben]{}, P. J., & [Wright]{}, M. C. H. 1995, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 77, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV, ed. R. A. [Shaw]{}, H. E. [Payne]{}, & J. J. E. [Hayes]{}, 433
, D., [van Gorkom]{}, J. H., & [van der Hulst]{}, J. M. 2013, , 145, 34
Schweizer, F. 1998, in Galaxies: Interactions and Induced Star Formation, ed. D. Friedli, L. Martinet, & D. Pfenniger (Berlin: Springer), 105
, F., & [Seitzer]{}, P. 2007, , 133, 2132
, B. T., [Sanders]{}, D. B., [Madore]{}, B. F., [Neugebauer]{}, G., [Danielson]{}, G. E., [Elias]{}, J. H., [Lonsdale]{}, C. J., & [Rice]{}, W. L. 1987, , 320, 238
, P. M., [Downes]{}, D., [Radford]{}, S. J. E., & [Barrett]{}, J. W. 1997, , 478, 144
, D. G., [Dewdney]{}, P. E., & [Ito]{}, M. R. 1984, , 137, 159
, O., [Clemens]{}, M. S., [Bressan]{}, A., [Granato]{}, G. L., [Silva]{}, L., & [Panuzzo]{}, P. 2008, , 484, 631
, S. D. M., & [Rees]{}, M. J. 1978, , 183, 341
[^1]: The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'Kinetically constrained models (KCMs) are models of glass formers based on the concept of dynamic facilitation. This concept accounts for many of the characteristics of the glass transition. KCMs usually display a combination of simple thermodynamics and complex glassy dynamics, the latter being a consequence of kinetic constraints. Here we show that KCMs can be regarded as systems whose configuration space is endowed with a simple energy surface but a complicated geometry. This geometry is determined solely by the kinetic constraints, and determines the dynamics of the system. It does not affect the overall distribution of states. Low temperature dynamical slow-down is then a consequence of the competition between the paths allowed by the geometry of configuration space, and those leading to energy relaxation. This competition gives rise to dynamical bottlenecks unrelated to static properties. This view of the dynamics is distinct from that based on an underlying static rugged energy landscape. We illustrate our ideas with simple examples.'
author:
- |
Stephen Whitelam$^1$ and Juan P. Garrahan$^{1,2}$\
$^1$[*Theoretical Physics, University of Oxford, 1 Keble Road, Oxford, OX1 3NP, UK*]{}\
$^2$[*School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK*]{}
title: Geometrical picture of dynamical facilitation
---
Introduction
============
The view of the glass transition (see [@review1; @review2; @review3] for general reviews) as a dynamical phenomenon emerges naturally from the real-space picture of supercooled liquids developed in [@Garrahan-Chandler; @Berthier-Garrahan; @Whitelam-Berthier-Garrahan; @Berthier; @Jung-Garrahan-Chandler]. This work demonstrates that many of the properties of supercooled liquids can be simply explained by the existence and statistical properties of spatially correlated dynamics, or dynamical heterogeneity [@DHreview1; @DHreview2; @DHreview3]. Dynamical heterogeneity has been observed both in deeply supercooled liquids [@DHexp1], in the mildly supercooled regime in simulations [@DHnum], and in experiments on colloidal suspensions [@DHexp2].
Heterogeneous dynamics, in combination with structural homogeneity, as observed in glass formers, appears in systems possessing both localized excitations and facilitated dynamics [@Glarum; @Palmer-et-al; @Fredrickson-Andersen]. The concept of dynamic facilitation stipulates that the dynamics of a local region is suppressed if is bordered by immobile regions, and thus reflects the idea that particles in a jammed liquid cannot rearrange unless adjacent to mobile particles. Dynamic facilitation is realized in KCMs, which are simple models of non interacting particles or excitations in a lattice whose dynamics is subject to kinetic constraints (see [@Ritort-Sollich] for a review). Examples of KCMs are spin facilitated models, like the Fredrickson-Andersen (FA) model [@Fredrickson-Andersen] or the East model [@Jackle], and constrained lattice gases, such as the Kob-Andersen model [@Kob-Andersen].
In this paper we study the effect that dynamic facilitation has on the geometry of configuration space, and how in turn this affects the dynamics [@nelson]. We show, by generalizing KCMs to continuous degrees of freedom, that kinetic constraints impose a metric structure on configuration space which does not affect the static distribution of states, and therefore the thermodynamics, but which has a dramatic effect on the paths between states at low energies. We show that dynamical slow-down at low temperatures occurs because the system is forced to evolve along configuration space paths of least metric distance, or geodesics, which are distinct from the paths that relax the energy. This competition between available trajectories and energy relaxation gives rise to dynamical barriers, or bottlenecks, which are unrelated to the statics of the system. This view of the dynamics is distinct from that based on the idea that a static rugged energy landscape is responsible for the properties of glass formers (see e.g. [@review3]).
This paper is organised as follows. In section \[geometric\] we discuss the geometric interpretation of dynamic facilitation. In sections \[examples\] and \[toy-model2\] we illustrate our ideas with simple examples. In section \[conclusions\] we state our conclusions.
Geometrical interpretation of constrained dynamics {#geometric}
==================================================
The real-space picture of supercooled liquids of Refs.[@Garrahan-Chandler; @Berthier-Garrahan; @Whitelam-Berthier-Garrahan; @Jung-Garrahan-Chandler] is based on two observations. First, at low temperature very few particles in the liquid are mobile, and these mobility excitations are localized in space. Second, regions of the liquid cannot become mobile unless their neighbouring regions are mobile. These observations are implemented as follows. A supercooled fluid in $d$ spatial dimensions is coarse-grained into cells of linear size of the order of the static correlation length as given by the pair correlation function. Cells are classified by a scalar mobility field, $x$, identified by coarse-graining the system on a microscopic time scale. Mobile regions carry a free energy cost, and when mobility is low interactions between cells are not important. Adopting a thermal language, we expect static equilibrium to be determined by the non-interacting Hamiltonian, $$\label{hamiltonian}
H[x] = \sum_{\mu=1}^N f_\mu(x^\mu),$$ where $\mu=1,\ldots,N$ labels the lattice site, $x^\mu$ is the mobility field at site $\mu$, and $f_\mu$ is an analytic function of $x^\mu$ chosen so that the ground state of the model is such that $|x^\mu|$ is small. At low mobility, the distinction between single and multiple occupancy is irrelevant, as is the distinction between discrete or continuous degrees of freedom. In what follows we assume $x^\mu$ to be real. The dynamics of the mobility field is given by a master equation, $$\label{master1}
\partial_t P\left( x , t \right) =
\sum_\mu \mathcal{C}_\mu \left( x \right) \,
\hat{\mathcal{L}_\mu} \, P\left( x , t \right) ,$$ where $P\left( x , t \right)$ is the probability that the system has configuration $x \equiv \{x^\mu \,|\, \mu=1,2,...,N\}$ at time $t$. The local operators $\hat{\mathcal{L}_\mu}$ are the same as those for unconstrained local dynamics. Their action on $P$ can be written $$\label{local}
\hat{\mathcal{L}_\mu} \, P\left( x \right) = \sum_{x'^{\mu}}
w(x'^{\mu} \rightarrow x^\mu) \, P\left(x'^{\mu},\{x^{\nu \neq
\mu}\}\right)- \sum_{x'^{\mu}} w(x^\mu \rightarrow
x'^{\mu}) \, P\left(x^\mu,\{x^{\nu \neq \mu}\}\right) ,$$ where $w(x^\mu \rightarrow x'^{\mu})$ is the probability of going from configuration $(x^\mu,\{x^{\nu \neq \mu}\})$ to configuration $(x'^{\mu},\{x^{\nu \neq \mu}\})$ in unit time. We ensure a unique equilibrium configuration exists by requiring (\[master1\]) to obey detailed balance with respect to (\[hamiltonian\]), i.e. $$\frac{w(x\rightarrow x')}{w(x' \rightarrow x)}
=e^{-\beta(H[x']-H[x])}.
\label{db}$$ The kinetic constraint, $\mathcal{C}_\mu \left( x \right)$, is designed to suppress the dynamics of cell $\mu$ when surrounded by immobile regions. It must also be such that Eq. (\[master1\]) satisfies detailed balance, which is achieved if $\mathcal{C}_\mu
\left( x \right)$ does not depend on $x^\mu$ itself. To reflect the local nature of dynamic facilitation we allow $\mathcal{C}_\mu$ to depend only on the $\{ x^\nu \}$ of nearest neighbours of $\mu$, and require that $\mathcal{C}_\mu$ is small when local mobility is scarce. Equations (\[hamiltonian\])-(\[db\]) define a generic KCM.
We now show that Eq. (\[master1\]) has a simple geometrical interpretation. Using standard methods [@Risken] we pass from the master equation (\[master1\]) to the Fokker-Planck equation $$\label{fokkerplanck}
\partial_t P\left( x , t \right) =
\sum_\mu \mathcal{L}^{({\rm FP})}_\mu \,P \left( x , t \right) ,$$ where $$\label{fokkerplanck2}
\mathcal{L}^{({\rm FP})}_\mu = \frac{\partial}{\partial x^\mu} \left\{
\mathcal{C}_\mu \left( x \right) f_\mu'(x^\mu) + T
\frac{\partial}{\partial x^\mu} \mathcal{C}_\mu \left( x \right)
\right\}.$$ The prime on $f_\mu$ denotes differentiation with respect to $x^\mu$. Equation (\[fokkerplanck\]) has a simple physical interpretation: it describes single-particle driven diffusion on an $N$-dimensional curved space $\{x^\mu \, |\, \mu = 1,2,...,N\}$ . The form of the driving term in (\[fokkerplanck2\]) comes from the Hamiltonian (\[hamiltonian\]) and the kinetic constraint. But the curvature of this space is due solely to the kinetic constraint: from the form of a Fokker-Planck equation on a curved manifold [@Risken] we identify the inverse metric tensor of this space as $g^{\mu \nu}(x) =
\delta^{\mu \nu} \mathcal{C}_\mu \left( x \right)$. Thus the metric reads $$\label{metric}
g_{\mu \nu}(x) = \delta_{\mu \nu} \mathcal{C}_\mu^{-1} \left( x \right).$$ No summation is implied. The effect of dynamic facilitation is to endow the configuration space $x$ with a nontrivial metric. Since dynamic facilitation is responsible for the interesting dynamical properties of these models, we expect that these dynamical properties can be extracted from the metric tensor.
The effect of the metric on configuration space trajectories is made clearer by writing a formal solution to equation (\[fokkerplanck\]) [@ZinnJustin]: $$\label{pathint}
P(x_b,t_b|x_a,t_a)=\int_a^b \sqrt{|g|} \, \mathcal{D}x \,
e^{-\mathcal{S}[x]},$$ where $P(x_b,t_b|x_a,t_a)$ is the conditional probability that a system starting at point $x_a$ in configuration space at time $t_a$ is found at point $x_b$ at time $t_b$. We have introduced the determinant of the metric, $|g| \equiv \det \left( g_{\mu \nu} \right)
= \prod_{\mu} \mathcal{C}_{\mu}^{-1}$. The path integral (\[pathint\]) is taken over all configurations of the system, weighted by the dynamic action $\mathcal{S}[x]$. Up to constant terms this action reads $$\label{action}
\mathcal{S}[x] = \frac{1}{T} \left( H[x_b]-H[x_a] \right)
+ \frac{1}{T} \int_{t_a}^{t_b} dt\, \left(
\dot{x}^{\mu} g_{\mu \nu} \dot{x}^{\nu} + \frac{\partial
H}{\partial x^{\mu}} g^{\mu \nu} \frac{\partial H}{\partial x^{\nu}}
\right),$$ where dots denote differentiation with respect to time, and the summation convention for once-repeated upper and lower indices is implied.
The action (\[action\]) weights the configuration space trajectories of our system. The system’s classical trajectory, i.e. the path taken by the dynamics when $T \to 0$, is one of extremum $\mathcal{S}$. At finite $T$, stochastic fluctuations cause perturbations about this path. Equation (\[action\]) shows clearly the way the various ingredients of a dynamically facilitated model influence its trajectory through configuration space. The first term depends only on the Hamiltonian (\[hamiltonian\]) evaluated at the endpoints. It gives rise to Boltzmann weights in the path integral (\[pathint\]) and plays no role in choosing the trajectory of the system. The path is chosen by a competition between the two terms in the integral of Eq. (\[action\]). The first term, $\mathcal{S}_1
\equiv T^{-1} \int dt \, \dot{x}^{\mu} g_{\mu \nu} \dot{x}^{\nu}$, is purely geometrical. It is the action for free motion in a curved background. It depends on the metric $g_{\mu \nu}$, and therefore on $\mathcal{C}^{-1}$. The second term, $\mathcal{S}_2 \equiv T^{-1}
\int dt \, \partial_{\mu} H \, g^{\mu \nu} \, \partial_{\nu} H$, depends on the Hamiltonian (\[hamiltonian\]), but is proportional to the inverse metric $g^{\mu \nu}$, and so to $\mathcal{C}$. At low temperatures, we expect $\mathcal{S}_2$ to be important only far from equilibrium, when mobility is plentiful—or equivalently, when the magnitudes of the coordinates $|x^{\mu}|$ are large and $\mathcal{C}$ is large—and the system’s relaxation will take place by way of gradient descent on the energy surface. When mobility has diminished significantly the constraints $\mathcal{C}$ become small. We then expect $\mathcal{S}_1$ to dominate. Hence the classical trajectory of the system in the region of weak dynamic facilitation will be governed by extremum $\mathcal{S}_1$. This corresponds to the equation of a geodesic [@Misner-Thorne-Wheeler]: $$\label{geodesic1}
\ddot{x}^{\mu}+\Gamma^{\mu}_{\alpha \beta} \dot{x}^{\alpha}
\dot{x}^{\beta}=0.$$ The Christoffel symbols $\Gamma^{\mu}_{\alpha \beta}$ are defined as $\Gamma_{\alpha \beta}^{\mu} \equiv \frac{1}{2} g^{\mu \nu} (g_{\nu
\alpha,\beta}+g_{\beta \nu,\alpha}-g_{\alpha \beta,\nu})$, and the metric tensor raises and lowers indices. Equation (\[geodesic1\]) tells us how the kinetic constraint controls the system’s trajectory in configuration space in the dynamically constrained regime. When mobility is scarce, the constraint $\mathcal{C}$ is small, and the metric distance between points in configuration space, $s_{ab} \equiv
\int_a^b \sqrt{g_{\mu \nu} dx^{\mu} dx^{\nu}}$, is large, by virtue of (\[metric\]). By minimising this distance, and so following Eq. (\[geodesic1\]), we expect the system to follow a path that does not lead directly to a configuration of lowest energy. This is a geometrical interpretation of dynamical arrest.
A simple example {#examples}
================
We now illustrate these ideas with a simple example. We define a model of two variables, $\{ x^\mu \} = \{ x, y \}$, with each variable constraining the other. Although such a model cannot exhibit true glassiness it is useful because we can visualise directly the two-dimensional configuration space it inhabits. We choose the Hamiltonian (\[hamiltonian\]) to be quadratic, $$H = \frac{J}{2} \left( x^2 + y^2 \right) ,$$ where $J$ sets the energy scale. We choose the constraint functions to be quadratic also, with each coordinate constraining the other: $$\mathcal{C}_x = y^2 , \;\;\; \mathcal{C}_y=x^2 .$$ Thus, the Fokker-Planck equation (\[fokkerplanck\]) is determined. Equation (\[metric\]) gives the metric of this system as $$g_{\mu \nu}=\left(\begin{array}{cc} 1/y^2 & 0 \\ 0 & 1/x^2 \end{array}
\right).$$ The metric is singular, and so distances in this configuration space become very large, when $x$ or $y$ vanish, reflecting the tendency of the kinetic constraint to suppress the dynamics of the system in the regime of low mobility. The space described by this metric is negatively curved with curvature scalar $R=-4 \left(x^2/y^2+y^2/x^2
\right)$ [@Misner-Thorne-Wheeler]. The geodesics follow from (\[geodesic1\]) which in this case read $$\label{geodesic2}
y\ddot{x}+(y/x)^3 \dot{y}^2-2 \dot{x} \dot{y}=0, \;\;\;
x \ddot{y}-(x/y)^3 \dot{x}^2-2 \dot{x} \dot{y}=0.$$ To illustrate the effect of the kinetic constraint on the trajectories chosen by the system we first cast Equation (\[fokkerplanck\]) into a form more convenient for numerical simulation. In the usual way [@VanKampen] we recognize that (\[fokkerplanck\]) is equivalent to the coupled Langevin equations $$\label{langevin}
\left(\begin{array}{c}
\dot{x}(t)\\
\dot{y}(t)
\end{array} \right)=-
\left(\begin{array}{c}
J y^2(t) x(t)\\
J x^2(t) y(t)
\end{array} \right)+
\left(\begin{array}{c}
|y(t)|\eta_1(t)\\
|x(t)| \eta_2(t)
\end{array} \right),$$ where the Gaussian white noise variables $\eta_i(t)$ have zero mean and variance $\langle \eta_i(t) \eta_j(t') \rangle = 2T \delta(t-t')
\delta_{ij}$. In this representation the kinetic constraint manifests itself as a state dependent rate: the driving term is linear in $\mathcal{C}$ while the noise term goes as $\sqrt{\mathcal{C}}$. The unconstrained version of the same model, i.e. one for which $(\mathcal{C}_x, \mathcal{C}_y)=(1,1)$, would have Langevin equation $\dot{x}^\mu(t)=-J x^\mu +\eta^\mu(t)$.
We now show explicitly that low temperature trajectories with fixed initial and final configurations are approximated by the geodesic equation (\[geodesic2\]). We have used Transition Path Sampling (TPS) [@Tps] to ensure that we obtained a set of trajectories which both obeyed the endpoint conditions are were well-sampled from the dynamical action (\[action\]). In order to generate out-of-equilibrium trajectories for the relaxation from high energy configurations we used the Crooks-Chandler [@Crooks] algorithm; alternatives such as the local algorithm of Ref.[@pratt] are also suitable.
Figure \[fig1\] presents the comparison of the dynamical evolution of our toy KCM with the geometry of its configuration space. TPS was used on the system defined by Eq. (\[langevin\]) to generate trajectories between the configurations indicated by a star. In Fig.1a we show both a characteristic trajectory (thin red path) and the average over the set of all trajectories obtained via TPS (thick blue path). We also show geodesics (black curves) joining the final configuration to the initial configuration (indicated by a star), and to other configurations along the gradient descent path (indicated by black squares). The solutions to (\[geodesic2\]) are degenerate: there is one geodesic going left from the initial point and another going right. The distinction depends on the initial conditions on the path. In the TPS simulations we force the initial displacement to be to the left to obtain a set of trajectories which follows the left hand geodesics. These are the paths shown in Fig. 1a and 1b. In Fig. 1b we also show the average over a small set of right hand TPS trajectories and the corresponding pairs of geodesics.
In Fig. \[fig1\] we see the features described in the previous section. Initially the system is in the high energy region and it relaxes approximately by gradient descent. As it reaches the region of weak dynamic facilitation at low energies, the system relaxes by following approximately the geodesics of configuration space. Shown for comparison in Fig. 1a are the trajectories followed by an unconstrained version of the same model (dashed green path). In this case relaxation is by gradient descent. Given that the rate for motion in the $x$ (resp. $y$) direction vanishes when $y$ (resp.$x$) vanishes, trajectories have to cross the coordinate axis orthogonally, which gives trajectories (and geodesics) a “rectangular” shape. Equipotential lines are concentric circles, and the conflict between allowed dynamical paths and energy relaxation is evident.
An even simpler example {#toy-model2}
=======================
We can gain more insight into the nature of dynamic facilitation by considering an even simpler, one-variable model. This can be thought of as modeling facilitated dynamics for an order parameter, rather than for microscopic variables. Equations (\[fokkerplanck\]) and (\[fokkerplanck2\]) tell us that an $N$-variable, dynamically constrained system looks like a single particle diffusing in $N$ space dimensions. Thus a one-variable dynamically constrained model looks like a single particle diffusing in one space dimension. We can exploit the fact that one dimensional spaces are always flat [@Misner-Thorne-Wheeler] to ‘remove’ the kinetic constraint. We will see below that this can be done at the expense of introducing an effective free energy barrier.
Consider a model with one degree of freedom, $x$, with Hamiltonian (\[hamiltonian\]) $H=J x^2/2$. We choose the dynamical constraint to be $\mathcal{C}(x)$. This differs from the higher-dimensional cases in that the variable constrains itself. Consequently, the transformation from Fokker-Planck to Langevin form is ambiguous [@VanKampen], and depends on whether one choses pre-point or mid-point discretisation of time-dependent quantities (Itô or Stratonovich calculus). We choose the former, so that our model is causal. The Langevin description of our one-variable model is then $$\label{onevar}
\dot{x}(t)=-J \, x \, \mathcal{C}(x)+T \mathcal{C}'(x)+\sqrt{\mathcal{C}(x)} \eta(t),$$ where the prime denotes differentiation with respect to $x$, and the noise term $\eta(t)$ has zero mean and variance $\langle \eta(t)
\eta(t') \rangle = 2T \delta(t-t')$. Since in this case the constraint depends on the variable it constrains, the second term on the right hand side of (\[onevar\]) is needed to ensure an equilibrium density proportional to $\exp{( - J x^2 / 2 T)}$ [@FP]. In the higher-dimensional cases we considered above there was no self-facilitation and this term was absent. The corresponding unconstrained model has $\mathcal{C}(x)=1$, and its Langevin equation is $\dot{x}(t)=-\partial_x (J x^2 / 2 )+\eta(t)$.
The appearance of the multiplicative noise term $\sqrt{\mathcal{C}(x)}
\eta(t)$ in Eq. (\[onevar\]) is due to the metric-augmented diffusion term in (\[fokkerplanck2\]), and is therefore a consequence of the kinetic constraint. The statement that a one-dimensional space is flat is equivalent to the statement that the noise may be made additive by a local change of variables. If we make the change of variables $$\label{change-of-variables}
y(t) \equiv \int^{x(t)} \frac{dx'}{\sqrt{\mathcal{C}(x')}},$$ we can use Itô’s formula [@VanKampen] to rewrite (\[onevar\]) as $$\label{onevar2}
\dot{y}(t)=-J x \sqrt{\mathcal{C}(x)}+ \frac{1}{2} \, T \,
\sqrt{\mathcal{C}(x)} \, \partial_x \ln \mathcal{C}(x) +\tilde{\eta}(t),$$ where $x$ should be eliminated in favour of $y$. The noise $\tilde{\eta}(t)$ has the same mean and variance as $\eta(t)$. Provided we can write the deterministic terms in (\[onevar2\]) as the gradient of an effective potential we can regard Equation (\[onevar2\]) as unconstrained, in the sense that the prefactor of the noise does not contain the dependent variable.
Consider the specific case of a quadratic constraint, $\mathcal{C}(x)=x^2$. Equation (\[onevar\]) becomes $$\dot{x} = - J \, x^3 + 2 \, T \, x + x \, \eta,$$ where we have assumed $x>0$. The change of variables (\[change-of-variables\]) now amounts to a Cole-Hopf transformation, $y \equiv \ln x$. Hence the regime where dynamic facilitation is relevant corresponds to $y \ll 0$. Equation (\[onevar2\]) now reads $$\label{unconstrained}
\dot{y}=- \partial_y \left( \frac{J}{2} \, e^{2 y} - T \, y \right)
+ \tilde{\eta}.$$ Equation (\[unconstrained\]) looks like an unconstrained model with an effective [*entropic*]{} barrier $\Delta F = - T y = - T \, \ln x$, which prevents the particle from accessing the dynamically constrained regime of $y \ll 0 \Rightarrow x \sim 0$ [@FPy]. Figure \[fig2\] illustrates this.
Conclusions
===========
In this paper we have presented a geometric interpretation of dynamic facilitation. By generalizing kinetically constrained models to continuous degrees of freedom we have shown that in these systems the kinetic constraints can be seen as endowing configuration space with a non-trivial metric structure. This metric structure in turn determines the dynamical trajectories. In the regime where the kinetic constraint is dominant, i.e. at low temperatures or energies, the geometry forces the dynamics to proceed through paths close to geodesics, rather than close to paths which relax the energy. This conflict between available paths and energy relaxation gives rise to dynamical bottlenecks or barriers, despite the fact that there are no static barriers in these systems.
Our view of dynamical arrest in terms of the geometry of configuration space is distinct from that based on the idea of motion in an effective rugged energy (or free energy) landscape (see [@review3] and references therein). In the landscape perspective it is often assumed that relevant features of the energy surface, like local minima and saddle points, determine the behaviour of the system, and that knowledge of the statistical properties of these features is sufficient to explain both dynamic and thermodynamic properties. In our approach the effective energy surface displays no particular features, the thermodynamics is uninteresting, and there are no special configurations, such as local minima or saddles, which play any major roles either in the statics or in the dynamics. All the interesting structure is in the paths between configurations, and therefore in the dynamics. In this picture it is the effective metric structure of configuration space that distinguishes a glassy system from a normal one, and not the ruggedness of its energy surface.
We are grateful to D. Chandler for discussions. We acknowledge financial support from EPSRC Grants No. GR/R83712/01 and GR/S54074/01, the Glasstone Fund, and Linacre College Oxford.
[99]{} C.A. Angell, Science [**267**]{}, 1924 (1995).
M.D. Ediger, C.A. Angell and S.R. Nagel, J. Phys. Chem. [**100**]{}, 13200 (1996).
P.G. Debenedetti and F.H. Stillinger, Nature [**410**]{}, 259 (2001).
J.P. Garrahan and D. Chandler, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**89**]{}, 035704 (2002); Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA [**100**]{}, 9710 (2003).
L. Berthier and J.P. Garrahan, J. Chem. Phys. [**119**]{}, 4367 (2003); Phys. Rev. E [**68**]{}, 041201 (2003).
S. Whitelam, L. Berthier, and J.P. Garrahan, e-print cond-mat/0310207 (2003).
L. Berthier, e-print cond-mat/0310210 (2003).
Y. Jung, J.P. Garrahan and D. Chandler, e-print cond-mat/0311396 (2003).
H. Sillescu, J. Non-Cryst. Solids [**243**]{}, 81 (1999).
M.D. Ediger, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. [**51**]{}, 99 (2000).
S.C. Glotzer, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, [**274**]{}, 342 (2000).
K. Schmidt–Rohr and H. Speiss, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**66**]{}, 3020 (1991); M.T. Cicerone and M.D. Ediger, J. Chem. Phys. [**103**]{}, 5684 (1995); E.V. Russell et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. [**81**]{}, 1461 (1998); L.A. Deschenes and D.A. Vanden Bout, Science [**292**]{}, 255 (2001).
T. Muranaka and Y. Hitawari, Phys. Rev. E [**51**]{}, R2735 (1995); D. Perera and P. Harrowell, Phys. Rev. E [**51**]{}, 314 (1995); B. Doliwa and A. Heuer, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**80**]{}, 4915 (1998); C. Donati et al., Phys. Rev. E [**60**]{}, 3107 (1999).
E. Weeks et al., Science [**287**]{}, 627 (2000).
S.H. Glarum, J. Chem. Phys. [**33**]{}, 639 (1960).
R.G Palmer, D.L. Stein, E. Abrahams and P.W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**53**]{}, 958 (1984).
G.H. Fredrickson and H.C. Andersen, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**53**]{}, 1244 (1984).
F. Ritort and P. Sollich, Adv. in Phys. [**52**]{}, 219 (2003).
J. Jäckle and S. Eisinger, Z. Phys. [**B84**]{}, 115 (1991).
W. Kob and H.C. Andersen, Phys. Rev. E [**48**]{}, 4364 (1993).
For other perspectives on glassiness also based on curved spaces, but with a different microscopic origin, see for example: P.J. Steinhardt, D.R. Nelson and M. Ronchetti, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**47**]{}, 1297 (1981) and D.R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. B [**28**]{}, 5515 (1983).
H. Risken, “The Fokker-Planck equation: Methods of solution and Applications”, (Springer Verlag, New York, 1984).
J. Zinn-Justin, “Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena”, (OUP, Oxford 1989).
C.W. Misner, K.S. Thorne, and J.A. Wheeler, Gravitation, W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco (1973).
N.G. Van Kampen, “Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry”, (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2001).
P.G. Bolhuis, D. Chandler, C. Dellago and P.L. Geissler, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. [**59**]{}, 291 (2002).
G.E. Crooks and D. Chandler, Phys. Rev. E [**64**]{}, 026109 (2001).
L.R. Pratt, J. Chem. Phys. [**85**]{}, 5045 (1986).
In the Itô convention, the Fokker-Planck equation for the Langevin equation (\[onevar\]) is $\partial_t P\left( x , t
\right) = \partial_x \left[ J \, x \, \mathcal{C}(x) \, P\left( x , t
\right) - T \mathcal{C}'(x) \, P\left( x , t \right) \right] + T \,
\partial^2_x \left[ \mathcal{C}(x) \, P\left( x , t \right) \right]$. The right hand side of this equation can be rewritten as $\partial_x
\left\{ \mathcal{C}(x) \left[ J \, x \, P\left( x , t \right) + T
\partial_x P\left( x , t \right) \right] \right\}$, leading to the equilibrium density $P_{\rm eq.}(x) \propto \exp{( - J x^2 / 2 T)}$, which is indeed independent of the constraining function $\mathcal{C}(x)$. If the Stratonovich convention is used, the second term in the right hand side of Eq. (\[onevar\]) is then preceded by a factor $1/2$, giving the same Fokker-Planck equation as above.
The equilibrium density in the $y$ representation is $P_{\rm eq.}(y) \propto \exp{( - J e^{2y} / 2 T + y)}$. This corresponds to the density $P_{\rm eq.}(x)$ after the change of variables $x \to y=\ln{x}$, as can be seen from the invariance of the partition function: $Z = \int \exp{( - J x^2 / 2 T)} \, dx = \int
\exp{( - J e^{2y} / 2 T)} \, e^{y} \, dy$.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'In this work we report on unusual nonlinear dynamics measured in the resonance response of NbN superconducting microwave resonators. The nonlinear dynamics, occurring at relatively low input powers (2-4 orders of magnitude lower than Nb), and which include among others, jumps in the resonance lineshape, hysteresis loops changing direction and resonance frequency shift, are measured herein using varying input power, applied magnetic field, white noise and rapid frequency sweeps. Based on these measurement results, we consider a hypothesis according to which local heating of weak links forming at the boundaries of the NbN grains are responsible for the observed behavior, and we show that most of the experimental results are qualitatively consistent with such hypothesis.'
author:
- 'B. Abdo'
- 'E. Segev'
- 'O. Shtempluck'
- 'E. Buks'
bibliography:
- 'apssamp.bib'
title: Nonlinear Dynamics in the Resonance Lineshape of NbN Superconducting Resonators
---
INTRODUCTION
============
Understanding the underlying mechanisms that cause and manifest nonlinear effects in superconductors has a significant implications for both basic science and technology. Nonlinear effects in superconductors may be exploited to demonstrate some important quantum phenomena in the microwave regime as was shown in Refs. [@squeezing; @JPA], and as was suggested recently in Refs. [@Yurke; @Eyal]. Whereas technologically, these effects can play a positive or negative role depending on the application. On the one hand, they are very useful in a wide range of nonlinear devices such as amplifiers [@rf; @driven; @Direct], mixers [@mixer], single photon detectors [@single; @photon], and SQUIDs [@flux; @qubit]. On the other hand, in other applications mainly in the telecommunication area, such as band pass filters and high Q resonators, nonlinearities are highly undesired [@Dahm; @RF; @power; @dependence; @Intrinsic; @nonlinear; @dynamics].
Various nonlinear effects in superconductors and in NbN in particular have been reported and analyzed in the past by several research groups. Duffing like nonlinearity for example was observed in superconducting resonators employing different geometries and materials. It was observed in a high-$T_{c}$ superconducting (HTS) parallel plate resonator [@Thermally; @induced; @nonlinear; @behaviour], in a Nb microstrip resonator [@microwave; @nonlinear; @effects; @in; @He-cooled; @sc; @microstrip; @resonators], in a Nb and NbN stripline resonators [@nonlinear; @dynamics], in a YBCO coplanar-waveguide resonator [@RF; @power; @dependence; @CP; @YBCO], in a YBCO thin film dielectric cavity [@Thermally-induced; @nonlinearities; @surface; @impedance; @sc; @YBCO], and also in a suspended HTS thin film resonator [@suspended; @HTS; @mw; @resonator]. While other nonlinearities including notches, anomalies developing at the resonance lineshape and frequency hysteresis were reported in Refs. [@HTS; @patch; @antenna; @power; @dependent; @effects; @observed; @for; @sc; @stripline; @resonator; @mw; @power; @handling; @weak; @links; @thermal; @effects].
However, in spite of the intensive study of nonlinearities in superconductors in the past decades, and the great progress achieved in this field, the determination of the underlying mechanisms responsible for microwave nonlinear behavior of both low- and high-$T_{c}$ superconductors is still a subject of debate [@understanding]. This is partly because of the variety of preparation and characterization techniques employed, and the numerous fabrication parameters involved. In addition nonlinear mechanisms in superconductors, which are usually divided into intrinsic and extrinsic, are various and many times act concurrently. Thus identifying the dominant mechanism is generally indirect [@Jerusalem].
Among the nonlinear mechanisms investigated in superconductors one can name, Meissner effect [@Yip], pair-breaking, global and local heating effects [@Thermally; @induced; @nonlinear; @behaviour; @Thermally-induced; @nonlinearities; @surface; @impedance; @sc; @YBCO], rf and dc vortex penetration and motion [@vortices], defect points, damaged edges [@edge], substrate material [@anomalies; @in; @nonlinear; @mw; @surface; @vs; @sub; @effects], and weak links (WL) [@Halbritter]. Where WL is a collective term representing various material defects such as, weak superconducting points switching to normal state under low current density, Josephson junctions forming inside the superconductor structure, grain-boundaries, voids, insulating oxides, insulating planes. These defects and impurities generally affect the conduction properties of the superconductor and as a result cause extrinsic nonlinear effects.
In this paper we report the observation of unique nonlinear effects measured in the resonance lineshape of NbN superconducting microwave resonators. Among the observed effects, asymmetric resonances, multiple jumps in the resonance curve, hysteretic behavior in the vicinity of the jumps, frequency hysteresis loops changing direction, jump frequency shift as the input power is increased and nonlinear coupling. Some of these nonlinear effects were introduced by us in a previous publication [@nonlinear; @features; @BB]. Thus this paper will focus on presenting a new set of measurements applied to these nonlinear resonators, which provides a better understanding of the underlying physical mechanism causing these effects. To this end, we have measured the nonlinear superconducting resonators using different operating conditions, such as bidirectional frequency sweeps, added white noise, fast frequency sweep using frequency modulation (FM), and dc magnetic field. In each case we observe a unique nonlinear dynamics of the resonance lineshape which is qualitatively different from the commonly reported Duffing oscillator nonlinearity. These nonlinear effects are shown to originate from WL forming at the boundaries of the NbN columnar structure. A theoretical model explaining the dynamical behavior of the resonance lineshape in terms of abrupt changes in the macroscopic parameters of the resonator is formulated. While these abrupt transitions in the characteristic parameters of the resonator are attributed to local heating of WL. Furthermore, simulations based on this model are shown to be in a very good qualitative agreement with the experimental results.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows, the fabrication process of the NbN superconducting resonators is described briefly in Sec. II. The nonlinear response of these resonators measured using various operating conditions are reviewed in Sec. III. Comparison with other nonlinearities reported in the literature is brought in Sec. IV. Possible underlying physical mechanisms responsible for the observed effects are discussed in Sec. V. Whereas in Sec. VI, a theoretical model based on local heating of weak links is suggested, followed by simulations qualitatively reproducing most of the nonlinear features observed in the experiments. Finally in Sec. VII, a short summary concludes this paper.
FABRICATION PROCESS
===================
The measurement results presented in this paper belong to three nonlinear NbN superconducting microwave resonators. The resonators were fabricated using stripline geometry, consisting of two superconducting ground planes, two sapphire substrates, and a center strip deposited in the middle (the deposition was done on one of the sapphire substrates). Fig. \[layout\] shows a schematic diagram illustrating stripline geometry and a top view of the three resonator-layouts. We will refer to the three resonators in the text by the names B1, B2 and B3 as defined in Fig. \[layout\]. The sapphire substrates dimensions used were $34%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{mm}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{mm}%
%EndExpansion
$ X $30%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{mm}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{mm}%
%EndExpansion
$ X $1%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{mm}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{mm}%
%EndExpansion
,$ whereas the coupling gap between the resonators and their feedline was set to $0.4%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{mm}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{mm}%
%EndExpansion
$ in B1 and B3 and $0.5%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{mm}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{mm}%
%EndExpansion
$ in B2 resonator. The resonators were dc-magnetron sputtered in a mixed Ar/N$_{2}$ atmosphere, near room temperature. The patterning was done using standard UV photolithography process, whereas the NbN etching was performed by Ar ion-milling. The sputtering parameters, fabrication details, design considerations as well as physical properties of the NbN films can be found elsewhere [@nonlinear; @features; @BB]. The critical temperature $T_{c}$ of B1, B2 and B3 resonators were relatively low and equal to $10.7%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{K}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{K}%
%EndExpansion
,$ $6.8%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{K}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{K}%
%EndExpansion
$ and $8.9%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{K}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{K}%
%EndExpansion
$ respectively. The thickness of the NbN resonators were $2200$ $%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{\U{212b}}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{\text{\AA}}%
%EndExpansion
$ in B1, $3000$ $%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{\U{212b}}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{\text{\AA}}%
%EndExpansion
$ in B2, and $2000$ $%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{\U{212b}}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{\text{\AA}}%
%EndExpansion
$ in B3 resonator.
\[ptb\]
[layout.eps]{}
NONLINEAR RESONANCE RESPONSE
============================
In the following subsections, we present experimental results emphasizing the different aspects of the nonlinear response exhibited by B1, B2 and B3 resonators. In subsection A, a resonance response measurement obtained while varying the input rf power is presented, showing an abrupt and low power onset of nonlinearity. In subsections B, C and D, representative experimental results measured while scanning the resonance response in the forward and backward directions are shown, exhibiting respectively, hysteresis loops changing direction, metastability and multiple jumps. Whereas in subsection E, the dependence of the resonance lineshape on applied dc magnetic field is examined, showing a change in the direction of the jump and a jump vanishing features. All measurements presented were performed at liquid helium temperature $4.2%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{K}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{K}%
%EndExpansion
$, and the results were verified using two configurations, immersing in liquid helium and in vacuum.
Abrupt onset of nonlinearity
----------------------------
In Fig. \[b1s11f1\] we present a $S_{11\text{ }}$parameter measurement of B1 first mode using a vector network analyzer. At low input powers, the resonance response lineshape is Lorentzian and symmetrical. As the input power is increased gradually in steps of $0.01$ dBm, the resonance response changes dramatically and abruptly at about $-28.04$ dBm. It becomes extremely asymmetrical, and includes two abrupt jumps at both sides of the resonance lineshape. The magnitude of the jumps at some input powers, can be as high as $16$ dB. As the input power is increased the resonance frequency is red shifted and the jump frequencies shift outwards away from the center frequency. Moreover at much higher powers not shown in the figure, the resonance curve becomes gradually shallower and broader in the frequency span. It is also worthwhile noting that the intensive evolution of the resonance lineshape shown in Fig. \[b1s11f1\] takes place within only $1$ dBm power range.
\[ptb\]
[b1s11f1.eps]{}
Hysteretic behavior
-------------------
As the equation of motion for nonlinear systems becomes multiple valued or lacks a steady state solution in some parameter domain, nonlinear systems tend to demonstrate hysteretic behavior with respect to that parameter.
Frequency hysteresis in the resonance lineshape of superconducting resonators exhibiting Duffing oscillator nonlinearity and other kinds of nonlinearities were observed by several groups [@HTS; @patch; @antenna; @Nonlinear; @TL]. Hysteretic behavior and losses in superconductors were discussed also in Refs. [@vortices; @vortex; @dynamics]. Moreover recent works, which examined the resonance response of rf tank circuit coupled to a SQUID, have reported several interesting frequency hysteresis features [@opposed; @hammerhead; @Pinch; @resonances; @in; @rf; @nonlinear; @multilevel].
Likewise measuring the resonance response of our nonlinear resonators yields a hysteretic behavior in the vicinity of the jumps. However, this hysteretic behavior is unique in many aspects. In Fig. \[hysteresis\] we show a $\ S_{11\text{ }}$measurement of B1 resonator at its first mode, measured while sweeping the frequency in both directions. The input power range shown in this measurement corresponds to a higher power range than that of Fig. \[b1s11f1\]. The red line represents a forward frequency sweep, whereas the blue line represents a backward frequency sweep.
At $-20.6$ dBm the resonance lineshape contains two jumps in each scan direction and two hysteresis loops. The left hysteresis loop circulates clockwise whereas the right loop circulates counter clockwise. However the common property characterizing them is that the jumps occur at higher frequencies in the forward scan compared to their counterparts in the backward scan. As the input power is increased to about $-20.2$ dBm the two opposed jumps at the left side meet and the left hysteresis loop vanishes. At about $-19.4$ dBm a similar effect happens to the right hysteresis loop, and it vanishes as well. Whereas at higher input powers (i.e. $-19$ dBm, $-18.6$ dBm) the two jumps occur earlier at each frequency sweep direction, causing the hysteresis loops to appear circulating in the opposite direction compared to the $-20.6$ dBm resonance curve for instance. As we show in the next subsection, this picture of well defined hysteresis loops is strongly dependent on the applied frequency sweep rate and on the system noise. A possible explanation for this unique hysteretic behavior would be presented in Sec. VI.
\[ptb\]
[hysteresis.eps]{}
Metastable states
-----------------
Jumps in the resonance response of a nonlinear oscillator are usually described in terms of metastable/stable states and dynamic transition between basins of attraction of the oscillator [@Cleland], thus in order to examine the stability of these observed resonance jumps, we carried out several measurements.
In one measurement, we have “zoomed in” around the right jump of the resonance at $-20.3$ dBm and examined its frequency response in both directions. The measurement setup included a signal generator, the cooled resonator and a spectrum analyzer. The reflected signal power off the resonator was redirected by a circulator, and measured using a spectrum analyzer. The measurement result obtained using $100$ sampling points in each direction, is exhibited in the inset of Fig. \[hysteresis\], where the metastable nature of the jump region is clearly demonstrated.
In another measurement configuration we have investigated this metastability further by monitoring the effect of applied broadband noise on the resonance jumps. We applied a constant white noise power to the resonator, several orders of magnitude lower than the main signal power, using the setup depicted in Fig. \[noisesetup\]. The applied white noise level was $-58$ dBm/Hz (measured separately using spectrum analyzer), and was generated by amplifying the thermal noise of a room temperature $50$ $%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{\U{3a9}}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{\Omega }%
%EndExpansion
$ load using an amplifying stage. The generated noise was added to the transmitted power of a network analyzer via a power combiner. The power reflections were redirected by a circulator, and were measured at the second port of the network analyzer. The effect of the $-58$ dBm/Hz white noise power on B1 first mode jumps, is shown in Fig. \[s21compnoise\] (a), whereas in Fig. \[s21compnoise\] (b) we show for comparison the nearly noiseless case obtained after disconnecting the amplifier and the combiner stage. The two measurements were carried out in the same input power range ($-23.9$ dBm through $-20$ dBm).
By comparing between the two measurement results, one can make the following observations. The two fold jumps in Fig. \[s21compnoise\] (b) form a hysteresis loop at both sides of the resonance curve. By contrast in Fig. \[s21compnoise\] (a), as a result of the added noise, the hysteresis loops at the right side vanish, while the jumps at the left side, become frequent and bidirectional (indicated by the thick colored lines).
At a given input drive, the transition rate $\Gamma\left( f\right) $ between the oscillator basins of attraction, can be generally estimated by the expression $\Gamma\left( f\right) =\Gamma_{0}\exp\left( -E_{A}\left(
f\right) /k_{B}T_{eff}\right) $ [@Cleland]$,$ where $E_{A}\left(
f\right) $ is the quasi-activation energy of the oscillator, $T_{eff}$ is proportional to the noise power, $k_{B}$ is Boltzmann’s constant, $f$ is the oscillator frequency, whereas $\Gamma_{0}$ is related to Kramers low-dissipation form [@Kramer] and it is given approximately by $f_{0}/Q$, where $f_{0}$ is the natural resonance frequency, and $Q$ is the quality factor of the oscillator. From our results we roughly estimate the order of magnitude of $E_{A}$ to be $10^{14}%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{K}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{K}%
%EndExpansion
$ for the jump on the left [@Cleland]. Note however that this quantity varies between different transitions and strongly depends on the operating point.
\[ptbh\]
[noisesetup.eps]{}
\[ptbh\]
[s21compnoise.eps]{}
Multiple jumps
--------------
Another nonlinear feature, namely multiple jumps in the resonance lineshape, is observed when measuring the resonance response of B3, while sweeping the frequency in the forward and backward directions. In Fig. \[b3fb\] we show a representative measurement of the first resonance of B3 corresponding to $1.49$ dBm input power, exhibiting three jumps in each sweep direction and four hysteresis loops.
\[ptb\]
[B3fb.eps]{}
Dc magnetic field dependence
----------------------------
Measuring B2 resonator second mode under dc magnetic field yielded additional nonlinear features in the resonance response lineshape as shown in Figs. \[b2s11magconst\], \[magnojump\].
In Fig. \[b2s11magconst\] we show the resonance lineshape of B2 second mode measured while applying a perpendicular dc magnetic field of $90%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{mT}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{mT}%
%EndExpansion
$. As the input rf power is increased gradually, the resonance lineshape undergoes different phases. While at low and high powers the curves are Lorentzians and symmetrical, in the intermediate range, the resonance curves include a jump at the left side, which, as the input power increases, flips from the upward to the downward direction.
Whereas in Fig. \[magnojump\], where we have set a constant input power of $-5$ dBm and increased the applied magnetic field by small steps, the left side jump vanishes as the magnetic field exceeds some relatively low threshold of $\sim11.8%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{mT}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{mT}%
%EndExpansion
$. These effects will be further discussed in Secs. V and VI.
\[ptbh\]
[B2magconst.eps]{}
\[ptbh\]
[B2nojump.eps]{}
COMPARISON WITH OTHER NONLINEARITIES
====================================
The most commonly reported nonlinearity in superconductors is the Duffing oscillator nonlinearity. However this nonlinearity is qualitatively different from the nonlinearity we observe in our NbN samples and which is reported in this paper. In Fig. \[nb\_duffing\] we show, for the sake of visual comparison, a resonance response measured at $4.2%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{K}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{K}%
%EndExpansion
$, exhibiting Duffing oscillator nonlinearity of the kind generally reported in the literature [@nonlinear; @dynamics; @Thermally; @induced; @nonlinear; @behaviour; @RF; @power; @dependence; @CP; @YBCO]. This nonlinearity which can be explained in terms of resistance change $\Delta R$ and kinetic inductance change $\Delta L_{K}$ [@Dahm; @Nonlinear; @TL] was measured at the first resonance frequency of a $2200$ $%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{\U{212b}}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{\text{\AA}}%
%EndExpansion
$ thickness Nb resonator employing B2 layout geometry ($T_{c}=8.9%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{K}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{K}%
%EndExpansion
$). The differences between the two nonlinear dynamics shown in Figs. \[b1s11f1\] and \[nb\_duffing\], are obvious. In Fig. \[nb\_duffing\] the nonlinearity is gradual, while in Fig. \[b1s11f1\] the power onset of nonlinearity is abrupt and sudden. In Fig. \[nb\_duffing\], the resonance response in the nonlinear regime, contains an infinite slope at the left side, whereas in Fig. \[b1s11f1\] the curves contain two jumps at both sides of the resonance response. In Fig. \[nb\_duffing\] changes in the resonance curve are measured on power scale of $1$ dBm, while changes in Fig. \[b1s11f1\] are measured on $0.01$ dBm scale. Whereas the onset of nonlinearity in Fig. \[nb\_duffing\] is of the order of $10$ dBm, the onset of nonlinearity in Fig. \[b1s11f1\] is about $4$ orders of magnitudes lower $\sim-28$ dBm. Furthermore, by taking into account the differences in the hysteretic behavior of the two nonlinearities and the multiple jumps feature shown in Fig. \[b3fb\], the special characteristics of the reported nonlinearity are further established.
Abrupt jumps in the resonance lineshape similar in some aspects to the jumps reported herein, were observed in two-port high-$T_{c}$ YBCO resonators [@HTS; @patch; @antenna; @power; @dependent; @effects; @observed; @for; @sc; @stripline; @resonator; @mw; @power; @handling; @weak; @links; @thermal; @effects]. Portes *et al.* [@HTS; @patch; @antenna] have also reported some frequency hysteretic behavior in the vicinity of the jumps. However, one significant difference between the two nonlinearities is the onset power of nonlinearity reported in these references, which is on the order of $20$ dBm [@power; @dependent; @effects; @observed; @for; @sc; @stripline; @resonator; @mw; @power; @handling; @weak; @links; @thermal; @effects], that is about $5$ orders of magnitude higher than the onset power of nonlinearity of B1 first mode ($\sim-28$ dBm). All three works [@HTS; @patch; @antenna; @power; @dependent; @effects; @observed; @for; @sc; @stripline; @resonator; @mw; @power; @handling; @weak; @links; @thermal; @effects] have attributed the nonlinear abrupt jumps to local heating of distributed WL in the resonator film.
\[ptb\]
[nb\_duffing.eps]{}
POSSIBLE NONLINEAR MECHANISMS
=============================
The relatively very low onset power of nonlinearity observed in these resonators as well as its strong sensitivity to rf power, highly imply an extrinsic origin of these effects, and as such, hot spots in WL is a leading candidate for explaining the nonlinearity.
Vortex penetration in the bulk or WL is less likely, mainly because heating the sample above $T_{c}$ between sequential magnetic field measurements, have yielded reproducible results with a good accuracy in the magnetic field magnitude, the microwave input power and in the jump frequency (less than $200$ $%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{kHz}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{kHz}%
%EndExpansion
$ offset). Moreover the low magnetic field threshold $\sim11.8$ $%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{mT}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{mT}%
%EndExpansion
$ above which the B2 resonance jump vanished, is about $3.5$ times lower than $H_{c_{1}}$ (flux penetration) of NbN reported for example in [@nonlinear; @dynamics].
In the following subsection A, we provide a direct evidence of WL. Whereas in subsection B, we exclude global heating mechanism as a possible source of the effects.
Columnar structure
------------------
It is well known from numerous research works done in the past [@rf; @superconducting; @properties; @of; @reactively; @sputtered; @NbN; @superconducting; @properties; @and; @NbN; @structure], that NbN films can grow in a granular columnar structure under certain deposition conditions. Such columnar structure may even promote the growth of random WL at the grain boundaries of the NbN films. To study the NbN granular structure we have sputtered about $2200%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{\U{212b}}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{\text{\AA}}%
%EndExpansion
$ NbN film on a thin small rectangular sapphire substrate of $0.2$ $%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{mm}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{mm}%
%EndExpansion
$ thickness. The sputtering conditions applied were similar to those used in the fabrication of B2 resonator. Following the sputtering process, the thin sapphire was cleaved, and a scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrograph was taken at the cleavage plane. The SEM micrograph in Fig. \[sem\] which clearly shows the columnar structure of the deposited NbN film and its grain boundaries, further supports our weak link hypothesis. The typical diameter of each NbN column is about $20$ $%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{nm}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{nm}%
%EndExpansion
.$
\[ptbh\]
[sem.eps]{}
Frequency sweep time analysis
-----------------------------
Resistive losses and heating effects are typically characterized by relatively long time scales [@Thermally; @induced; @nonlinear; @behaviour]. In attempt to consider whether such effects are responsible for the observed nonlinearities in general and for the jumps in particular, we have run frequency sweep time analysis using the experimental setup depicted in Fig. \[fmsetup\]. We have controlled the frequency sweep cycle of a signal generator via FM modulation. The FM modulation was obtained by feeding the signal generator with a saw tooth waveform having $1/f$ sweep time cycle. The reflected power from the resonator was redirected using a circulator and measured by a power diode and oscilloscope. The left and right hand jumps of B2 $\sim4.39%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{GHz}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{GHz}%
%EndExpansion
$ resonance were measured using this setup, while applying increasing FM modulation frequencies up to $200%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{kHz}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{kHz}%
%EndExpansion
$. In Fig. \[timesweep\] we present a measurement result obtained at $50%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{kHz}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{kHz}%
%EndExpansion
$ FM modulation, or alternatively $T_{sweep}$ of $20%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{\U{3bc}s}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{\mu s}%
%EndExpansion
$. The FM modulation applied was $\pm20%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{MHz}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{MHz}%
%EndExpansion
$ around $4.4022%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{GHz}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{GHz}%
%EndExpansion
$ center frequency. The measured resonance response appears inverted in the figure due to the negative output polarity of the power diode. The fact that both jumps continue to occur within the resonance lineshape (see Fig. \[timesweep\]), in spite of the short duty cycles that are of the order of $\sim%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{\U{3bc}s}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{\mu s}%
%EndExpansion
$, indicates that heating processes which have typical time scale on the order of $%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{s}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{s}%
%EndExpansion
$ to $%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{ms}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{ms}%
%EndExpansion
$ [@Thermally; @induced; @nonlinear; @behaviour] are unlikely to cause these effects.
\[ptbh\]
[fmsetup.eps]{}
\[ptbh\]
[timesweep.eps]{}
However the above measurement result does not exclude local heating of WL [@Bol; @Nonequilibrium; @Use]. Assuming that the substrate is isothermal and that the hot spot is dissipated mainly down into the substrate rather than along the film [@Bol], one can evaluate the characteristic relaxation time of the hot spot using the equation $\tau=Cd/\alpha,$ where $C$ is the heat capacity of the superconducting film (per unit volume), $d$ is the film thickness, and $\alpha$ is the thermal surface conductance between the film and the substrate [@Nonequilibrium]. Substituting for our B2 NbN resonator yields a characteristic relaxation time of $\tau\simeq5.4\cdot10^{-8}%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{s}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{s}%
%EndExpansion
,$ where the parameters $C\simeq2.7\cdot10^{-3}%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{J}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{J}%
%EndExpansion%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{cm}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{cm}%
%EndExpansion
^{-3}%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{K}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{K}%
%EndExpansion
^{-1}$ (NbN) [@Use], $d=3000%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{\U{212b}}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{\text{\AA}}%
%EndExpansion
$ (B2 thickness)$,$ and $\alpha\simeq1.5%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{W}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{W}%
%EndExpansion%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{cm}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{cm}%
%EndExpansion
^{-2}%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{K}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{K}%
%EndExpansion
^{-1}$ at $4.2%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{K}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{K}%
%EndExpansion
$ (sapphire substrate) [@Use], have been used. Similar calculation based on values given in Ref. [@Bol] yields $\tau\simeq2.1\cdot10^{-9}%
%TCIMACRO{\unit{s}}%
%BeginExpansion
\mathrm{s}%
%EndExpansion
.$ These time scales are of course 2-3 orders of magnitude lower than the time scales examined by the FM modulation setup, and thus local heating of WL is not ruled out.
LOCAL HEATING of WL MODEL
=========================
In this section we consider a hypothesis according to which local heating of WL is responsible for the observed effects. We show that this hypothesis can account for the main nonlinear features observed, and that simulations based on such a theoretical model, exhibit a very good qualitative agreement with experimental results.
Theoretical modeling
--------------------
Consider a resonator driven by a weakly coupled feedline carrying an incident coherent tone $b^{in}e^{-i\omega_{p}t}$, where $b^{in}$ is a constant complex amplitude and $\omega_{p}$ is the drive angular frequency. The mode amplitude inside the resonator $A$ can be written as $A=Be^{-i\omega_{p}t}$, where $B\left( t\right) $ is a complex amplitude, which is assumed to vary slowly on the time scale of $1/\omega_{p}$. In this approximation, the equation of motion of $B$ reads [@Yurke] $$\frac{dB}{dt}=\left[ i\left( \omega_{p}-\omega_{0}\right) -\gamma\right]
B-i\sqrt{2\gamma_{1}}b^{in}+c^{in}, \label{dB/dt}%$$
where $\omega_{0}$ is the angular resonance frequency, $\gamma=\gamma
_{1}+\gamma_{2}$, $\gamma_{1}$ is the coupling constant between the resonator and the feedline, and $\gamma_{2}$ is the damping rate of the mode. The term $c^{in}$ represents input noise with vanishing average $$\langle c^{in}\rangle=0,$$
and correlation function given by $$\langle c^{in}(t)c^{in\ast}(t^{\prime})\rangle=G\omega_{0}\delta\left(
t-t^{\prime}\right) . \label{corr}%$$
In thermal equilibrium and for the case of high temperature $k_{B}%
T>>\hbar\omega_{0}$, where $k_{B}$ is Boltzmann’s constant, one has $$G=\frac{2\gamma}{\omega_{0}}\frac{k_{B}T}{\hbar\omega_{0}}.$$
In terms of the dimensionless time $\tau=\omega_{0}t,$ Eq. (\[dB/dt\]) reads $$\frac{dB}{d\tau}=\frac{i\left( \omega_{p}-\omega_{0}\right) -\gamma}%
{\omega_{0}}\left( B-B_{\infty}\right) +\frac{c^{in}}{\omega_{0}},
\label{dB/d_tau}%$$
where $$B_{\infty}=\frac{i\sqrt{2\gamma_{1}}b^{in}}{i\left( \omega_{p}-\omega
_{0}\right) -\gamma}. \label{Binf}%$$
Small noise gives rise to fluctuations around the steady state solution $B_{\infty}$. A straightforward calculation yields $$\left\langle \left\vert B-B_{\infty}\right\vert ^{2}\right\rangle
=\frac{G\omega_{0}}{2\gamma}.$$ The output signal $a^{out}$ reflected off the resonator can be written as $a^{out}=b^{out}e^{-i\omega_{p}t}$. The input-output relation relating the output signal to the input signal is given by [@Gardiner] $$\frac{b^{out}}{\sqrt{\omega_{0}}}=\frac{b^{in}}{\sqrt{\omega_{0}}}%
-i\sqrt{\frac{2\gamma_{1}}{\omega_{0}}}B. \label{in_out}%$$
Whereas the total power dissipated in the resonator $Q_{t}$ can be expressed as [@Yurke] $$Q_{t}=\hslash\omega_{0}2\gamma_{2}E, \label{Qt}%$$
where $E=\left\vert B\right\vert ^{2}$.
Furthermore, consider the case where the nonlinearity is originated by a local hot spot in the stripline resonator. If the hot spot is assumed to be sufficiently small, its temperature $T$ can be considered homogeneous. The temperature of other parts of the resonator is assumed be equal to that of the coolant $T_{0}$. The power $Q$ heating up the hot spot is given by $Q=\alpha
Q_{t}$ where $0\leqslant\alpha\leqslant1$.
The heat balance equation reads $$C\frac{dT}{dt}=Q-W, \label{heat_balance}%$$
where $C$ is the thermal heat capacity, $W=H\left( T-T_{0}\right) $ is the power of heat transfer to the coolant, and $H$ the heat transfer coefficient. Defining the dimensionless temperature [@hot; @spots] $$\Theta=\frac{T-T_{0}}{T_{c}-T_{0}}, \label{Theta}%$$
where $T_{c}$ is the critical temperature, one has $$\frac{d\Theta}{d\tau}=-g\left( \Theta-\Theta_{\infty}\right) ,
\label{dT/d_tau}%$$
where $$\Theta_{\infty}=\frac{2\alpha\gamma_{2}\rho E}{\omega_{0}g}, \label{Theta_inf}%$$ $$\rho=\frac{\hslash\omega_{0}}{C\left( T_{c}-T_{0}\right) }, \label{rho}%$$ $$g=\frac{H}{C\omega_{0}}. \label{g}%$$
While in Duffing oscillator equation discussed in Ref. [@Yurke], the nonlinearity can be described in terms of a gradually varying resonance frequency dependent on the amplitude of the oscillations inside the cavity, in the current case, the resonance frequency $\omega_{0}$, the damping rates $\gamma_{1}$, $\gamma_{2}$ and $\alpha$ factor are considered to have a step function dependence on $T$, the temperature of the WL $$\omega_{0}=\left\{
\begin{array}
[c]{cc}%
\omega_{0s} & \Theta<1\\
\omega_{0n} & \Theta>1
\end{array}
\right. , \label{w0}%$$ $$\gamma_{1}=\left\{
\begin{array}
[c]{cc}%
\gamma_{1s} & \Theta<1\\
\gamma_{1n} & \Theta>1
\end{array}
\right. , \label{g1}%$$ $$\gamma_{2}=\left\{
\begin{array}
[c]{cc}%
\gamma_{2s} & \Theta<1\\
\gamma_{2n} & \Theta>1
\end{array}
\right. , \label{g2}%$$ $$\alpha=\left\{
\begin{array}
[c]{cc}%
\alpha_{s} & \Theta<1\\
\alpha_{n} & \Theta>1
\end{array}
\right. . \label{alpha}%$$
In general, while disregarding noise, the coupled differential equations (\[dB/d\_tau\]) and (\[dT/d\_tau\]) may have up to two different steady state solutions. A superconducting steady state of the WL exists when $\Theta_{\infty}<1$, or alternatively when $E<E_{s}$, where $E_{s}=gC\left(
T_{c}-T_{0}\right) /2\alpha_{s}\gamma_{2s}\hslash$. Similarly, a normal steady state of the WL exists when $\Theta_{\infty}>1$, or alternatively when $E>E_{n}$, where $E_{n}=gC\left( T_{c}-T_{0}\right) /2\alpha_{n}\gamma
_{2n}\hslash$.
In general, the reflection coefficient $S_{11}$ in steady state is given by [@Yurke] $$S_{11}=\frac{b^{out}}{b^{in}}=\frac{\gamma_{2}-\gamma_{1}-i\left( \omega
_{p}-\omega_{0}\right) }{\gamma_{2}+\gamma_{1}-i\left( \omega_{p}-\omega
_{0}\right) }. \label{r}%$$
Simulation results
------------------
Simulating the resonator system using this local heating WL model, yields results which qualitatively agree with most of the nonlinear effects previously presented. In subsection (1) we simulate the main effects of Sec. III (A, B, C, D), whereas in subsection (2) we simulate and provide a possible explanation to the nonlinear features of Sec. III (E).
### Abrupt jumps and hysteretic behavior
In Fig. \[two\_wells\] we show a resonance response simulation result based on the hot spot model, which simulates the abrupt jump exhibited in Fig. \[b1s11f1\]. The solid and dotted lines represent valid steady state solutions of the system and invalid steady state solutions respectively. Whereas the blue and red colors represent superconducting WL solutions and normal WL solutions respectively. In plot (a) the superconducting WL solution is valid in the normalized frequency span, and therefore the system follows this lineshape without jumps. As we increase the amplitude drive $b_{in}$ we obtain a result seen in plot (b). As the frequency is swept, jumps in the resonance response are expected to take place as the solution followed by the system (according to the initial conditions) becomes invalid. Thus in the forward sweep direction (as the frequency sweep of Fig. \[b1s11f1\]), we get two jumps indicated by black arrows on the figure. Similar to Fig. \[b1s11f1\], the magnitudes of the jumps in the plot are unequal (the left jump is higher). This difference in the magnitude of the jumps is generally dependent on the relative position between the two resonance frequencies (Eq. \[w0\]), while in measurement due to the metastability of the system in the hysteretic regime, it depends also on the frequency sweep rate. The simulation parameters used in the different cases are indicated in the figure captions.
\[ptb\]
[two\_wells.eps]{}
The behavior of the frequency hysteresis loops exhibited in Fig. \[hysteresis\] is simulated in Fig. \[twodirmod\]. The different plots exhibited in Fig. \[twodirmod\] correspond to the different cases shown in Fig. \[hysteresis\]. In plot (a) the jumps in the forward direction (indicated by the arrows in that direction) occur at higher frequencies than the jumps in the backward direction. Whereas in plot (b) corresponding to a higher amplitude drive $b_{in}$ we show a case in which the left side hysteresis loop vanish as the two opposed jump frequencies coincide. If we increase $b_{in}$ further, then at some amplitude drive level as shown in plot (c), we get a similar case of hysteresis loop vanishing at the right side of the resonance response. Whereas at the left side we get a frequency region where both the superconducting and the normal WL solutions are invalid. In this instable region, transitions between the invalid solutions are expected, depending on the number of the sampling points, the sweep time, and the internal noise. However due to this instability, the system is highly expected to jump “early” in each frequency direction, as it enters this region (at lower frequencies in the forward direction, and at higher frequencies in the backward direction). Thus leading to the observed change in the direction of the hysteresis loop. By increasing $b_{in}$ further, one obtains a case in which both hysteresis loops are circulating in the opposite direction compared to plot (a).
\[ptb\]
[TwoDirMod.eps]{}
Furthermore the intermediate jump indicating instability, which appear at the left jump region of the last resonance curve in Fig. \[hysteresis\] (corresponding to $-18.6$ dBm), can be explained by this model as well. By solving the coupled Eqs. (\[dB/d\_tau\]), (\[dT/d\_tau\]) in the time domain for a single normalized frequency $\omega_{p}=0.9952$ (arbitrarily chosen in the left side hysteresis region) and using the simulation parameters of plot (d) in Fig. \[twodirmod\], one obtains the oscillation pattern of the dimensionless parameter $\Theta$ shown in Fig. \[thetatau\], as a function of the dimensionless time $\tau$. The $\Theta$ oscillations indicating instability are between the superconducting and the normal values, corresponding to $\Theta<1$ and $\Theta>1$ respectively.
\[ptb\]
[ThetaTau.eps]{}
As to the multiple jumps feature exhibited in Fig. \[b3fb\], a straightforward generalization of the model may be needed in order to account for this effect. Such generalization would include WL having a variation in their sizes and critical current along the stripline. Thus causing them to switch to normal state at different current drives (at different frequencies) and as a result induce more than two jumps in the resonance lineshape.
### Magnetic field dependence
In this subsection we show how the model of local heating of WL can also account for the nonlinear dynamics of the resonance lineshape observed under applied magnetic field.
To this end, we show in Fig. \[magsim\] a simulation result based on the WL local heating model, which qualitatively regenerates the nonlinear behavior of the resonance lineshape of B2 under a constant magnetic field (presented in Fig. \[b2s11magconst\]). At low drive amplitude $b_{in}$, only the superconducting WL steady state solution exists, and thus no jump occurs as one sweeps the frequency (plot (a)). Increasing the drive amplitude $b_{in}$ (plot (b)) causes the superconducting WL solution to become invalid in the center frequency region, thus the resonance response jumps upward (as the system reaches the invalid region) and stabilizes on the normal WL steady state solution, as indicated by arrows on the plot. By increasing the drive amplitude further (plot (c)) there exists an intersection point where a smooth transition without a jump is expected to occur between the valid superconducting WL solution and the valid normal one. Whereas in plot (d) where we have increased $b_{in}$ further, a downward jump in the resonance response occurs as the valid normal WL solution lies below the invalid superconducting WL solution. Finally in plot (e) corresponding to a much higher drive, only the normal WL steady state solution exists within the frequency span and therefore there are no jumps in the resultant curve.
\[ptb\]
[MagSim.eps]{}
Another measurement which can be explained using the WL model, is the measurement shown in Fig. \[magnojump\], where the left side jump vanishes as the magnetic field increases above some low magnetic field threshold. This result can be explained in the following manner. Increasing the applied dc magnetic field would inevitably increase the screening supercurrent flowing in the film and the local heating of WL. As the local heating exceeds some threshold, the superconducting WL solution would become invalid (for the same frequency span), and consequently the system would only follow the normal WL solution without apparent jumps.
SUMMARY
=======
In attempt to investigate and manifest nonlinear effects in superconducting microwave resonators, several superconducting NbN resonators employing different layouts, but similar sputtering conditions have been designed and fabricated. The resonance lineshapes of these NbN resonators having very low onset of nonlinearity, several orders of magnitude lower than other reported nonlinearities [@nonlinear; @dynamics; @mw; @hysteretic; @losses; @in; @YBCO; @and; @NbN; @Palomba], exhibit some extraordinary nonlinear dynamics. Among the nonlinearities observed, while applying different measurement configurations, abrupt metastable jumps in the resonance lineshape, hysteresis loops changing direction, multiple jumps, vanishing jumps and jumps changing direction. These effects are hypothesized to originate from weak links located at the boundaries of the columnar structure of the NbN films. This hypothesis is fully consistent with SEM micrographs of these films, and generally agrees with the extrinsic like behavior of these resonators. To account for the various nonlinearities observed, a theoretical model assuming local heating of weak links is suggested. Furthermore, simulation results employing this model are shown to be in a very good qualitative agreement with measurements.
Such strong sensitive nonlinear effects reported herein may be utilized in the future in a variety of applications, ranging from qubit coupling in quantum computation, to signal amplification [@IMD; @amplifier] and to the demonstration of some important quantum effects in the microwave regime [@nonlinear; @coupling; @Yurke].
**ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS**
E.B. would especially like to thank Michael L. Roukes for supporting the early stage of this research and for many helpful conversations and invaluable suggestions. Very helpful conversations with Oded Gottlieb, Gad Koren, Emil Polturak, and Bernard Yurke are also gratefully acknowledged. This work was supported by the German Israel Foundation under grant 1-2038.1114.07, the Israel Science Foundation under grant 1380021, the Deborah Foundation and Poznanski Foundation.
[99]{}
R. Movshovich, B. Yurke, P. G. Kaminsky, A. D. Smith, A. H. Silver, R. W. Simon, and M. V. Schneider, Phys. Rev. Lett. **65**, 1419 (1990).
B. Yurke, P. G. Kaminsky, R. E. Miller, E. A. Whittaker, A. D. Smith, A. H. Silver, and R. W. Simon, IEEE Trans. Mag. **25**, 1371 (1989).
B. Yurke and E. Buks, quant-ph/0505018.
E. Buks and B. Yurke, quant-ph/0511033.
I. Siddiqi, R. Vijay, F. Pierre, C. M. Wilson, M. Metcalfe, C. Riggetti, L. Frunzio, and M. H. Devoret, Phys. Rev. Lett. **93**, 207002 (2004).
I. Siddiqi, R. Vijay, F. Pierre, C. M. Wilson, L. Frunzio, M. Metcalfe, C. Riggetti, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. H. Devoret, D. Vion and D. Esteve, Phys. Rev. Lett. **94**, 027005 (2005).
P. J. Burke, R. J. Schoelkopf, D. E. Prober, A. Skalare, B. S. Karasik, M. C. Gaidis, W. R. McGrath, B. Bumble, and H. G. LeDuc, J. Appl. Phys. **85**, 1644 (1999).
R. Sobolewski, A. Verevkin, G. N. Gol’tsman, A. Lipatov and K. Wilsher, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. **13**, 1151 (2003).
I. Chiorescu, Y. Nakamura, C. J. P. M. Harmans, and J. E. Mooij, Science **299**, 1869 (2003).
T. Dahm and D. J. Scalapino, J. Appl. Phys. **81**, 2002 (1997).
Z. Ma, E. de Obaldia, G. Hampel, P. Polakos, P. Mankiewich, B. Batlogg, W. Prusseit, H. Kinder, A. Anderson, D. E. Oates, R. Ono, and J. Beall, IEEE trans. Appl. Supercond. **7**, 1911 (1997).
R. B. Hammond, E. R. Soares, B. A. Willemsen, T. Dahm, D. J. Scalapino, and J. R. Schrieffer, J. Appl. Phys. **84**, 5662 (1998).
C. C. Chen, D. E. Oates, G. Dresselhaus and M. S. Dresselhaus, Phys. Rev. B. **45**, 4788 (1992).
L. F. Cohen, A. L. Cowie, A. Purnell, N. A. Lindop, S. Thiess, and J. C. Gallop, Supercond. Sci. and Technol. ** **15**, 559 (2002).
A. L. Karuzskii, A. E. Krapivka, A. N. Lykov, A. V. Perestoronin, and A. I. Golovashkin, Physica B **329-333**, 1514 (2003).
Z. Ma, E. D. Obaldia, G. Hampel, P. Polakos, P. Mankiewich, B. Batlogg, W. Prusseit, H. Kinder, A. Anderson, D. E. Oates, R. Ono, and J. Beall, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. **7**, 1911 (1997).
J. Wosik, L.-M. Xie, J. H. Miller, Jr., S. A. Long, and K. Nesteruk, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. **7**, 1470 (1997).
B. A. Willemsen, J. S. Derov, J. H. Silva, S. Sridhar, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. **5**, 1753 (1995).
A. M. Portis, H. Chaloupka, M. Jeck, and A. Pischke, Superconduct. Sci. & Technol. **4**, 436 (1991).
S. J. Hedges, M. J. Adams, and B. F. Nicholson, Elect. Lett. **26**, 977 (1990).
J. Wosik, L.-M. Xie, R. Grabovickic, T. Hogan, and S. A. Long, ** IEEE Trans Appl. Supercond. ** **9**, 2456 (1999).
D.E. Oates, M. A. Hein, P. J. Hirst, R. G. Humphreys, G. Koren, and E. Polturak, Physica C. **372-376**, 462 (2002).
M. A. Golosovsky, H. J. Snortland, and M. R. Beasley, Phys. Rev. B. **51**, 6462 (1995).
S. K. Yip and J. A. Sauls, Phys. Rev. lett. **69**, 2264 (1992).
D. E. Oates, H. Xin, G. Dresselhaus, and M. S. Dresselhaus, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 11, 2804 (2001).
B. B. Jin and R. X. Wu, J. of Supercond. **11**, 291 (1998).
A. V. Velichko, D. W. Huish, M. J. Lancaster, and A. Porch, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. **13**, 3598 (2003).
J. Halbritter, J. Appl. Phys. ** **68**, 6315 (1990).
B. Abdo, E. Segev, Oleg Shtempluck, and E. Buks, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. (to be published), cond-mat/0501114.
J. H. Oates, R. T. Shin, D. E. Oates, M. J. Tsuk, and P. P. Nguyen, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. **3**, 17 (1993).
H. Xin, D.E. Oates, G. Dresselhaus, and M. S. Dresselhaus, J. Supercond. **14**, 637 (2001).
R. Whiteman, J. Diggins, V. Schöllmann, T. D. Clark, R. J. Prance, H. Prance, and J. F. Ralph, Phys. Lett. A **234**, 205 (1997).
H. Prance, T. D. Clark, R. Whiteman, R. J. Prance, M. Everitt, P. Stiffel, and J. F. Ralph, cond-mat/0411139.
R. J. Prance, R. Whiteman, T. D. Clark, H. Prance, V. Schöllmann, J. F. Ralph, S. Al-Khawaja, and M. Everitt, Phys. Rev. Lett. **82**, 5401 (1999).
J. S. Aldridge and A. N. Cleland, cond-mat/0406528.
H. A. Kramers, Physica **7**, 284 (1940).
D. M. Sheen, S. M. Ali, D. E. Oates, R. S. Withers, and J. A. Kong, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. **1**, 108 (1991).
M. W. Johnson, A. M. Herr, and A. M. Kadin, J. Appl. Phys. **79**, 7069 (1996).
A. M. Kadin and M. W. Johnson, Appl. Phys. Lett. **69**, 3938 (1996).
K. Weiser, U. Strom, S. A. Wolf, and D. U. Gubser, J. Appl. Phys. **52**, 4888 (1981).
S. Isagawa, J. Appl. Phys. **52**, 921 (1980).
Y. M. Shy, L. E. Toth, and R. Somasundaram, J. Appl. Phys. **44**, 5539 (1973).
C. W. Gardinar and M. J. Collett, Phys. Rev. A **31**, 3761 (1985).
A. VI. Gurevich and R. G. Mints, Rev. Mod. Phys. **59**, 941 (1987).
P. P. Nguyen, D. E. Oates, G. Dresselhaus, M. S. Dresselhaus, and A. C. Anderson, Phys. Rev. B **51**, 6686 (1995).
A. Andreone, A. Cassinese, A. Di Chiara, M. Lavarone, F. Palomba, A. Ruosi, and R. Vaglio, J. Appl. Phys. **82**, 1736 (1997).
B. Abdo, E. Segev, O. Shtempluck, and E. Buks, cond-mat/0507056.
B. Abdo, E. Segev, O. Shtempluck, and E. Buks, cond-mat/0501236.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We study a special dynamical regime of a Bose-Einstein condensate in a ring-shaped lattice where the populations in each site remain constant during the time evolution. The states in this regime are characterized by equal occupation numbers in alternate wells and non-trivial phases, while the phase differences between neighboring sites evolve in time yielding persistent currents that oscillate around the lattice. We show that the velocity circulation around the ring lattice alternates between two values determined by the number of wells and with a specific time period that is only driven by the onsite interaction energy parameter. In contrast to the self-trapping regime present in optical lattices, the occupation number at each site does not show any oscillation and the particle imbalance does not possess a lower bound for the phenomenon to occur. These findings are predicted with a multimode model and confirmed by full three-dimensional Gross-Pitaevskii simulations using an effective onsite interaction energy parameter.'
author:
- 'M. Nigro'
- 'P. Capuzzi'
- 'D. M. Jezek'
title: 'Blocked populations in ring-shaped optical lattices'
---
Introduction
============
The self-trapping phenomenon has been extensively studied in double-well systems by means of a two-mode model [@smerzi97; @ragh99; @anan06; @jia08; @mele11; @abad11; @mauro17; @doublewell], and experimentally observed by Albiez [*et al.*]{} [@albiez05; @thesisAlbiez; @thesisGati]. In this regime the population in one site remains higher than the one in the other well over all the evolution. This imbalance of particles performs oscillations around the non vanishing mean value, whereas the phase difference between the sites exhibits a running phase behavior. Theoretical studies of this phenomenon has been also carried out by several authors in extended regular lattices [@Anker2005; @Wang2006; @optlat; @stlastoplat]. More recently, the study of self-trapping has also been addressed in ring-shaped optical lattices [@cuatropozos06; @arwas2014; @mauro4p]. Such works treat three- and four-well systems. In Refs.[@cuatropozos06; @arwas2014] the dynamics has been investigated through a multimode (M) model that utilized [*ad-hoc*]{} values for the hopping and onsite energy parameters. Whereas in Ref. [@mauro4p], such parameters have been extracted from a mean-field approach using three-dimensional localized “Wannier-like” (WL) onsite functions and including an effective onsite interaction energy parameter [@jezek13a; @jezek13b]. For large filling numbers, the inclusion of such a realistic interaction parameter has been shown to be crucial for the accurate description of the dynamics, yielding a sizable change on the time periods respect to those obtained by the standard model. In contrast, for filling number around unity mean-field approaches are not applicable and hence other microscopic methods have to be used [@Kolovski2006; @Gallemi2016]. In Ref.[@Burchianti2017], it has been demonstrated that an effective interaction can also be extracted from the Bogoliubov excitations in the case of the Josephson regime. A systematic study of the self-trapping regime and the crossover to the Josephson oscillations in four-well systems including non-symmetric configurations has been developed in Ref. [@mauro4p]. It is worthwhile noticing that the dynamics in multiple well condensates constitutes a promising area provided that successful efforts have been performed to experimentally construct ring-shaped optical lattices [@hen09].
In this work we demonstrate theoretically the existence of a dynamical regime that exhibits a novel behavior. If the number of wells of the lattice is a multiple of four, there exists a family of nonstationary states with constant site populations and special non-trivial phases. These states could be regarded as a special variation of a ST regime where, in contrast to that observed in two- and multiple-well condensates [@smerzi97; @ragh99; @mauro17; @mauro4p], the population imbalance between neighboring sites can be arbitrarily low and do not exhibit any oscillation in time. For such states the M model order parameter can be expressed as a linear combination of particular degenerate Gross-Pitaevskii (GP) stationary states. However, due to the nonlinear nature of the GP equation, the states are nonstationary. The dynamics of these states is governed only by the onsite interaction energy parameter. We explicitly show that the angular momentum exhibits a simple oscillating behavior and that the velocity circulation around the ring alternates periodically between values $-N_c/4$ and $N_c/4$, being $N_c$ the number of weakly linked condensates. A goal of this work is to obtain an analytical expression for such a time period which involves only the imbalance and the effective interaction parameter. By comparing the evolution of the phase differences obtained through GP simulations for a four-well system and with the M model, we can establish the accuracy of such a parameter. The existence of these states is confirmed numerically by means of full three-dimensional Gross-Pitaevskii (GP) simulations showing a perfect accordance to the M model predictions for several population imbalances. Furthermore, a Floquet stability analysis confirms that for the imbalances studied here the dynamics turns out to be regular.
The paper is organized as follows. In Sec. \[multimode\] we briefly review the main concepts of the multimode model. In particular, we rewrite the equations of motion which include an effective onsite interaction parameter [@mauro4p] and we outline the construction of the localized states in terms of the GP stationary ones. In Sec. \[trap4\] we describe the specific four-well system used in the numerical simulations. Section \[states\] is devoted to study the properties of these states with blocked occupation numbers. As a first step we introduce a continuous family of states corresponding to fixed points of the M model in the phase diagram defined by the populations and phase differences. On the other hand, we demonstrate that they turn out to be quasi-stationary solutions of the GP equation. Such states are defined with a particular combination of phases which give rise the non-stationary blocked-occupation-number (BON) states. Secondly, we show that these BON states describe closed orbits in the phase diagram whose time period is solely determined by the onsite interaction energy. By performing GP numerical simulations with a four-well potential we analyze the hidden dynamics which includes variations of density in the interwell regions, oscillations of the velocity field circulation, and an active vortex dynamics. We end this section with a study of the Floquet stability of the BON states and a proposed experimental test. In Sec. \[larger\] we show how to generalize the previous results for systems with larger number of sites. To conclude, a summary of our work is presented in Sec. \[sum\] and the definition of the parameters employed in the equations of motion are gathered in the Appendix.
Multimode model {#multimode}
===============
The equations of motion of the multimode model has been previously studied both for multiple-well systems in general [@cat11; @jezek13b] and also in the case of a four-well system [@cuatropozos06; @mauro4p]. Here, we only review its main ingredients, focusing in the definition of their localized states extracted from the stationary solutions of the GP equations.
Multimode model equations of motion including interaction-driven corrections
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using the multimode model order parameter, $$\psi_M (t,{\mathbf r}) = \sum_k \, b_k(t) \, w_k ({ r, \theta,z})
\,,
\label{orderparameter}$$ written in terms of three-dimensional WL functions localized at the $k$-site, $w_k(\mathbf{r})$ [@mauro4p], one obtains the equations of motion for the time dependent coefficients $b_k(t)= e^{i \phi_k} \, |b_k| $, by replacing the order parameter in the time dependent GP equation. The $ 2 N_c $ real equations, written in terms of the populations $ n_k =|b_{k}|^2 = N_k / N $ and phase differences $ \varphi_k= \phi_k - \phi_{k-1}$ including effective onsite interaction corrections [@mauro4p], are
$$\begin{aligned}
\hbar\,\frac{dn_k}{dt}& = & - 2 J \left[ \sqrt{n_k \, n_{k+1}} \, \sin\varphi_{k+1}
- \sqrt{n_k \, n_{k-1} } \, \sin\varphi_k \right ]\nonumber\\
&-& 2 F \left[ \sqrt{n_k \, n_{k+1} } (n_k + n_{k+1} ) \, \sin\varphi_{k+1} \right. \nonumber\\
&-& \left.\sqrt{n_k \, n_{k-1} } (n_k + n_{k-1} ) \, \sin\varphi_k\right] \, ,
\label{ncmode1hn}\end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}
\hbar\,\frac{d\varphi_k}{dt} & = & ( n_{k-1} -n_{k}) N U_{\text{eff}} \nonumber\\
&-& \alpha ( n_{k-1} - n_{k}) N U \left[ N_c (n_{k-1}+ n_{k})-2 \right] \nonumber\\
&-& J \left[ \left(\sqrt{\frac{n_k}{ n_{k-1}}}
- \sqrt{\frac{n_{k-1} }{ n_k}}\,\right) \, \cos\varphi_k \right.\nonumber\\
&+& \left. \sqrt{\frac{n_{k-2}}{ n_{k-1} }} \, \cos\varphi_{k-1}
- \sqrt{\frac{n_{k+1} }{ n_k}} \, \cos\varphi_{k+1} \right]\nonumber\\
&-& F \left[ \left( n_k \sqrt{\frac{n_k}{ n_{k-1} }} - n_{k-1} \sqrt{\frac{n_{k-1}}{ n_k}}\,\right)
\, \cos\varphi_k \right.\nonumber\\
&+& \left( 3\, \sqrt{n_{k-2} \, n_{k-1}} + n_{k-2} \sqrt{\frac{n_{k-2}}{ n_{k-1}}}\,\right)
\, \cos\varphi_{k-1} \nonumber\\
&-& \left.\left( 3\, \sqrt{n_{k+1} \, n_k} + n_{k+1} \sqrt{\frac{n_{k+1}} { n_k}}\,\right) \,
\cos\varphi_{k+1}\right], \nonumber \\
\label{ncmode2hn}\end{aligned}$$
where $U_{\text{eff}}= f_{3D} U$. The definitions of the tunneling parameters $J$ and $F$, and of the onsite interaction energy parameter $U$ are given in the Appendix. The coefficient $f_{3D}= 1-\alpha$ is obtained from the slope of the onsite interaction energy as function of $\Delta N_k - N/N_c$. As shown in Refs. [@jezek13b; @mauro4p], the introduction of $f_{3D}$ is crucial for obtaining an accurate dynamics. From this system of equations only $2N_c- 2$ are independent since the variables must fulfill $\sum_k n_k=1$ and $\sum_k \varphi_k=0$.
Localized states
-----------------
In previous works, we have described in detail the method for obtaining the localized states in terms of GP stationary states [@mauro4p; @cat11; @jezek13b]. Summarizing, first the stationary states $\psi_n( r, \theta, z )$ are obtained as the numerical solutions of the three-dimensional GP equation [@gros61] with different winding numbers $n$, with $n$ restricted to the values $-[(N_c-1)/2]\leq n \leq [N_c/2]$ [@je11] for large barrier heights [@cat11]. Since the $\psi_n$ are orthogonal for different $n$ [@cat11; @jezek13b], one can define orthogonal WL functions localized on the $k$-site by the following expression: $$w_k({ r, \theta, z })=\frac{1}{\sqrt{N_c}} \sum_{n} \psi_n({ r, \theta, z})
\, e^{-i n\theta_k } \,,
\label{wannier}$$ with $\theta_k = 2 \pi k / N_c$ for $-[(N_c-1)/2]\leq k\leq [N_c/2]$. A discussion of how to choose the global phases of $ \psi_n({ r, \theta, z})$ in order to achieve the maximum localization of $w_k$ is given in Ref. [@mauro4p].
In its turn, the stationary wavefunctions can be written in terms of the localized WL wavefunctions in Eq. (\[wannier\]) as $$\psi_n({r,\theta,z}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{N_c}}\sum_{k} w_k({r,\theta, z}) e^{i n\, k\,2\pi/N_c}.$$ For the four-well problem, $N_c=4$, the states with $n=\pm 1$ are degenerate and can be regarded as vortex-antivortex states since $\psi_{\pm 1}=\frac{1}{2}\sum\limits_kw_k e^{\pm i\frac{\pi}{2} k}$ have opposite circulation. It is worthwhile remarking that as the GP equation is nonlinear, linear combinations of degenerate stationary states, as , e.g., the vortex-antivortex states, are in general nonstationary.
The system, trapping potential and parameters {#trap4}
===============================================
Although the states investigated in this work also exist for larger number of wells, in our numerical simulations we will consider a four-well ring-shaped trapping potential given by $$V_{\text{trap}}({\bf r} ) = \frac{ m }{2 } \left[
\omega_{r}^2 r^2
+ \omega_{z}^2 z^2 \right]
+
V_b \left[ \cos^2(\pi x/q_0)+
\cos^2(\pi y/q_0)\right],
\label{eq:trap4}$$ where $r^2=x^2+y^2$ and $m$ is the atom mass. The harmonic frequencies are given by $ \omega_{r}= 2 \pi \times 70 $ Hz and $ \omega_{z}= 2 \pi \times 90 $ Hz, and the lattice parameter is $ q_0= 5.1 \mu$m. Hereafter, time and energy will be given in units of $\omega_r^{-1}$ and $\hbar\omega_r$, respectively. The length will be given in units of the radial oscillator length $l_r=\sqrt{\hbar/(m\omega_r)}\simeq 1.3\,\mu$m. We also fix the barrier height parameter at $V_b = 25 \hbar\omega_r $ and the number of particles to $ N=10^4 $.
For a system of Rubidium atoms in the above configuration we have obtained the following multimode parameters, the hopping $ J=-6.60\times 10^{-4} \hbar \omega_r $, the interaction driven hopping parameter $F= 2.08\times 10^{-3} \hbar\omega_r$, the onsite interaction energy $U= 3.16\times 10^{-3} \hbar\omega_r$, and the effective onsite interaction energy $U_{\mathrm{eff}}=2.27 \times10^{-3}\hbar\omega_r$, being $\alpha= 0.28 $. We will numerically solve the GP equation on a grid of up to $512\times 512\times 256$ points and using a second-order split-step Fourier method for the dynamics with a time step of $\Delta t = 10^{-4}\omega_r^{-1}$. For more details see Ref. [@mauro4p].
The states {#states}
============
In this section we will first analyze a set of stationary points of the M model with equally populated sites whose associated order parameters are in general not exact GP stationary states. These states shall be called peculiar. In a second step, we shall show that for states with conveniently chosen initial occupation numbers and the same distribution of initial phases as the peculiar states, the populations remain blocked during all the evolution. The properties of such BON states shall be studied next.
Peculiar stationary states {#peculiar}
----------------------------
The GP stationary states used for constructing the multimode model give rise to stationary points in the M model. However, in addition to these standard points, we found a peculiar set of stationary points in a condensate with $N_c=4l$ sites. These states are defined by $ | b_k| = 1/\sqrt{N_c} $ and the following local phases: $ \phi_0 =0$, $ \phi_{ 1} = f_0 - \pi $, $ \phi_2 =\pi$, and $ \phi_{ -1} = f_0 $ for a four-well trap ($l=1$). Whereas for larger $l$, the sequence of phases is repeated $l$ times along the ring. We refer to these states as peculiar because $f_0$ could take any value, so that instead of having isolated points in the phase diagram we have a continuous family of stationary points parametrized by $f_0$. This family contains the two stationary points $f_0= \pm \pi/2$ which correspond to singly-quantized vortex states, namely, GP stationary states with winding numbers $\pm 1$. In Fig. \[fig:rho3D\] (a) a scheme of the trap and the condensate is depicted qualitatively showing states with different populations, and in Fig. \[fig:rho3D\] (b) the localized WL function in the $z=0$ plane are shown together with the peculiar initial phases.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
![\[fig:rho3D\] (color online) (a): Schematic three-dimensional states density and the trapping potential of the four-site system (in arbitrary units). (b): Localized states $ w_k$ at the plane $z=0$, also the peculiar set of initial values of the phases are indicated.](fig1a.pdf "fig:"){width="0.55\columnwidth"} ![\[fig:rho3D\] (color online) (a): Schematic three-dimensional states density and the trapping potential of the four-site system (in arbitrary units). (b): Localized states $ w_k$ at the plane $z=0$, also the peculiar set of initial values of the phases are indicated.](fig1b.pdf "fig:"){width="0.42\columnwidth"}
(a) (b)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We further investigate if the peculiar order parameter could also be another stationary solution of the GP equation [@gros61], $$\left[ -\frac{ \hbar^2}{2m} \nabla^2 + V_{\text{trap}} +
g \, |\psi(\mathbf{r})|^2 \right] \psi(\mathbf{r})= \mu \, \psi(\mathbf{r}),
\label{gp}$$ where $\mu $ is the chemical potential and $g=4\pi \hbar^2 a /m$ is the interaction strength among atoms with $a$ being their $s$-wave scattering length.
The normalized-to-unity order parameter associated to the peculiar points reads, $$\psi_M ({\mathbf r},t) = \frac{1}{2} [ w_0(\mathbf{r})-w_2(\mathbf{r})] - \frac{1}{2}
[{w}_1(\mathbf{r})-{w}_{-1}(\mathbf{r})] e^{i f_0}
\label{orderwi0}$$ which in terms of GP stationary states can be written as $$\psi_M ({\mathbf r}) = \frac{ 1}{2} \left[ ( 1 + i e^{i f_0} )
\psi_1({\mathbf r})
+ (1 - i e^{i f_0} ) \psi_{-1}({\mathbf r}) \right] \, .
\label{gcuatrod}$$ The peculiar states are therefore a superposition of vortex states with opposite circulation. Since the states $ \psi_{1}({\mathbf r})$ and $\psi_{-1}( {\mathbf r})$ have the same chemical potential $\mu_1=\mu_{-1}$ and verify $ \psi_{1}({\mathbf r}) =\psi^*_{-1}({\mathbf r})$, applying the GP equation (\[gp\]) to $\psi_M$ we obtain, $$\begin{gathered}
\left[ -\frac{ \hbar^2}{2m} \nabla^2 + V_{\text{trap}} +
g \, |\psi_M (\mathbf{r})|^2 \right] \psi_M ({\mathbf r}) = \mu_1 \, \psi_M ({\mathbf r}) \\
- g N \cos(f_0) \Im\left( \psi_{1}^2({\mathbf r})\right) \left[ \Re ( \psi_{1} ) - \Im (\psi_{1}) e^{i f_0} \right]
\label{gcuatrod2}\end{gathered}$$ where in addition, we have that $$\Im\left (\psi_{1}^2({\mathbf r})\right) = \frac{1}{4}
[w_0({\mathbf r})-w_2({\mathbf r})] \, [ w_1({\mathbf r})-w_{-1}({\mathbf r})]
\label{gcuatrod3}$$ is almost vanishing if the WL functions are well localized as it is in the present case. Therefore, these peculiar stationary points can be regarded as quasi-stationary solutions of the GP equation.
For the particular case of $f_0= \pm \pi/2$, the second term of the right hand side of Eq. (\[gcuatrod2\]) vanishes and thus the order parameter is an exact solution of the GP equation. Otherwise, a general value of $f_0$ generates an entire continuous family of states that shows a collective motion independent of time. The $\psi _{\pm 1}$ stationary solutions can be regarded as particular cases of Eq. (\[gcuatrod\]) with maximum angular momentum. On the other hand, for $f_0=0$ we have $\psi_M ({\mathbf r}) = \frac{ 1}{2} \left[ ( 1 + i ) \psi_1({\mathbf
r}) + (1 - i ) \psi_{-1}({\mathbf r}) \right]$ which is real, hence its angular momentum is zero. Nevertheless an active vortex dynamics is present, due to the nonzero circulation of $\psi _{\pm 1}$. The same holds for $f_0=\pi$.
We want to remark that such a family of stationary solutions of the M model does not necessarily exist in ring lattices with an arbitrary number of wells as it can be straightforwardly deduced from the dynamical equations (\[ncmode1hn\]) and (\[ncmode2hn\]). For example, for $N_c=3$ even though the degenerate stationary states with winding numbers $n= \pm 1$ are also present, the corresponding stationary points in the phase diagram only exist as isolated points.
Nonstationary BON states
-------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
![\[fig:popu\] Populations (left column) and phase differences (right column) as function of time, from top to bottom for $\Delta N=100$, $200$, and $400$ with $f_0(0)= -\pi$. The solid lines correspond to GP simulations and the dashed lines to the M model. Black and red lines correspond to $N_k$ and $ \varphi_k$ with $k=0$ and $k=1$, respectively. The dotted blue lines in the top right panel illustrates the prediction of the M model with the bare $U$. ](fig2tl.pdf "fig:"){width="0.5\columnwidth"} ![\[fig:popu\] Populations (left column) and phase differences (right column) as function of time, from top to bottom for $\Delta N=100$, $200$, and $400$ with $f_0(0)= -\pi$. The solid lines correspond to GP simulations and the dashed lines to the M model. Black and red lines correspond to $N_k$ and $ \varphi_k$ with $k=0$ and $k=1$, respectively. The dotted blue lines in the top right panel illustrates the prediction of the M model with the bare $U$. ](fig2tr.pdf "fig:"){width="0.5\columnwidth"}
![\[fig:popu\] Populations (left column) and phase differences (right column) as function of time, from top to bottom for $\Delta N=100$, $200$, and $400$ with $f_0(0)= -\pi$. The solid lines correspond to GP simulations and the dashed lines to the M model. Black and red lines correspond to $N_k$ and $ \varphi_k$ with $k=0$ and $k=1$, respectively. The dotted blue lines in the top right panel illustrates the prediction of the M model with the bare $U$. ](fig2ml.pdf "fig:"){width="0.5\columnwidth"} ![\[fig:popu\] Populations (left column) and phase differences (right column) as function of time, from top to bottom for $\Delta N=100$, $200$, and $400$ with $f_0(0)= -\pi$. The solid lines correspond to GP simulations and the dashed lines to the M model. Black and red lines correspond to $N_k$ and $ \varphi_k$ with $k=0$ and $k=1$, respectively. The dotted blue lines in the top right panel illustrates the prediction of the M model with the bare $U$. ](fig2mr.pdf "fig:"){width="0.5\columnwidth"}
![\[fig:popu\] Populations (left column) and phase differences (right column) as function of time, from top to bottom for $\Delta N=100$, $200$, and $400$ with $f_0(0)= -\pi$. The solid lines correspond to GP simulations and the dashed lines to the M model. Black and red lines correspond to $N_k$ and $ \varphi_k$ with $k=0$ and $k=1$, respectively. The dotted blue lines in the top right panel illustrates the prediction of the M model with the bare $U$. ](fig2bl.pdf "fig:"){width="0.5\columnwidth"} ![\[fig:popu\] Populations (left column) and phase differences (right column) as function of time, from top to bottom for $\Delta N=100$, $200$, and $400$ with $f_0(0)= -\pi$. The solid lines correspond to GP simulations and the dashed lines to the M model. Black and red lines correspond to $N_k$ and $ \varphi_k$ with $k=0$ and $k=1$, respectively. The dotted blue lines in the top right panel illustrates the prediction of the M model with the bare $U$. ](fig2br.pdf "fig:"){width="0.5\columnwidth"}
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When the numbers of particles of alternate sites are equal and the phases maintain their peculiar relation: $ \phi_0 =0$, $ \phi_{ 1} = f_0 - \pi $, $ \phi_2 =\pi$, and $ \phi_{ -1} = f_0 $, the site populations do not evolve. This condition gives rise to very special dynamical states where $f_0$ becomes time dependent. This is shown in Fig. \[fig:popu\] where we compare the evolution of the occupation numbers and phase differences using full three-dimensional GP simulations with the dynamics arising from the M model. The selected initial population differences, from top to bottom, are $\Delta N =100$, $200$, and $400$, where $\Delta N= N_0 - N_1 $ and $f_0(0)= - \pi $. From Fig. \[fig:popu\] it may be seen that in all cases the number of particles in each site remains fixed in time, whereas their phase differences evolve faster for larger imbalances. We have further investigated the GPE dynamics for imbalances up to $\Delta N = 3\times 10^3$ and verified that the populations remain constant within $0.1\%$ accuracy.
These family of states bear some resemblance to self-trapped states; however, there are many important differences compared to the well-known ST dynamics in double well potentials. First of all, the population imbalance can be arbitrarily small. Instead, to reach these states, it is only necessary to achieve the peculiar phases described above, being $f_{0}(0)$ an arbitrary value (given that $n_{k}=n_{k+2}$). Second, the hopping parameters $J$ and $F$ play no role in the dynamics, hence we cannot associate the emergence of the BON states to the small enough tunneling energy splitting like in the ST regime in two wells [@albiez05].
The BON state normalized to unity reads, $$\psi_M ({\mathbf r},t) = \sqrt{n_0} [
{w}_0(\mathbf{r})-{w}_2(\mathbf{r})] - \sqrt{n_1}
[{w}_1(\mathbf{r})-{w}_{-1}(\mathbf{r})] e^{i f_0(t)}
\label{bon1}$$ which written in terms of GP stationary states yields, $$\begin{gathered}
\psi_M ({\mathbf r}) = \left( \sqrt{n_0} + i \sqrt{n_1} e^{i f_0(t)} \right)
\psi_1({\mathbf r})
\\ + \left( \sqrt{n_0} - i \sqrt{n_1} e^{i f_0(t)} \right) \psi_{-1}({\mathbf r}) \, .
\label{bon2}\end{gathered}$$
In order to obtain $f_0(t)$ one can rewrite Eqs. (\[ncmode2hn\]) and extract the evolution of $ f_0(t)$ from $ \hbar\, \dot{\varphi_k} = ( n_{k-1} -n_{k}) N U_{\text{eff}} $. This yields $$f_0(t)= \frac{1}{\hbar} U_{\text{eff}} \Delta N\, t + f_0(0),
\label{f0}$$ which in turns completely defines all the phase differences at any time within the M model. In particular, we have $\varphi_0(t)= -f_0(t)$ and $\varphi_1(t)= f_0(t) -\pi $. We note that for $n_0 = n_1$ the state (\[bon2\]) coincides with the peculiar state (\[gcuatrod\]).
It is important to point out here, that the perfect agreement between the results of GP equation and the M model observed in Fig. \[fig:popu\] is due to the proper definition of the onsite interaction energy parameter $U_{\mathrm{eff}}=2.27 \times10^{-3}\hbar\omega_r$ [@jezek13a; @jezek13b], instead of using the bare value $U=3.16 \times10^{-3}\hbar\omega_r$. To illustrate such a difference, we included in Fig. \[fig:popu\] the evolution of $\varphi_1(t)$ for $\Delta N =100$ using the bare parameter $U$. Hence, we confirm the accuracy on the calculation of the effective onsite interaction energy parameter also in this dynamical regime. To conclude we note that using Eq. (\[f0\]) one can obtain the time period for the phase differences, $$T_{M} = \frac{2 \pi \hbar }{ U_{\text{eff}} \Delta N}.
\label{period}$$ which turns to be also the time period of the persistent and collective oscillation around the ring.
### Angular momentum
An additional evidence of this dynamical regime is reflected in the time evolution of other observables. In particular, we shall show that within the M model the angular momentum exhibits a sinusoidal behavior as a function of time with a period $T_M$.
The expectation value per particle of a general observable $\widehat{O}$, considering an arbitrary state in the M model is given by $$\begin{aligned}
\langle\widehat{O}\rangle &= &\sum_kn_k\langle w_k|\widehat{O}| w_k\rangle \\
&+&
2 \sum_k\sqrt{n_kn_{k+1}}\Re\left[e^{i(\phi_k-\phi_{k+1})}\langle w_{k+1}|\widehat{O}| w_k\rangle\right]. \nonumber \\
\nonumber
\label{operadorgen1}\end{aligned}$$ Since each well is equivalent to all others unless a discrete rotation, we have $\langle w_k|\widehat{O}|w_k\rangle=\langle w_0|\widehat{O}|w_0\rangle$ and $\langle w_{k+1}|\widehat{O}|w_k\rangle=\langle w_1|\widehat{O}|w_0\rangle$ for all $k$. Hence, the expectation value becomes $$\begin{aligned}
\langle\widehat{O}\rangle &= & \langle w_0|\widehat{O}|w_0\rangle \nonumber\\
&+&
2 \sum_k\sqrt{n_kn_{k+1}}\Re\left[e^{-i\varphi_{k+1}}\langle w_{1}|\widehat{O}|w_0\rangle\right]. \,
\label{operadorgen2}\end{aligned}$$ For the $z$-component of the angular momentum we have $ \widehat{O}= \widehat{L}_z = -i \hbar
\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta} $ and then taking into account that the localized states can be chosen as real functions, one obtains the expectation value of angular momentum $$\langle\widehat{L}_z\rangle =
-2\hbar \langle w_{1}| \frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}|w_0\rangle \sum_k\sqrt{n_kn_{k+1}} \sin{\varphi_{k+1}} \, .
\label{lz2}$$ In a BON state with initial condition $f_0(0)=-\pi$, as $ \sin{\varphi_{k}} =- \sin{f_0(t)}$ for every $k$, we can write $$\langle\widehat{L}_z\rangle=
- 8\hbar\sqrt{n_0n_1}\langle w_1|\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}|w_0\rangle \sin\left({\frac{1}{\hbar} U_{\text{eff}} \Delta N t}\right)
\label{4lz2}$$ where the bracket involving the localized states is a negative number. As expected, the period of this sinusoidal function is $T_M$. Furthermore, one can see that the stationary state Eq.(\[orderwi0\]), corresponding to $\Delta N=0$, yields a constant angular momentum proportional to $\sin(f_0)$.
### Underlying dynamics
Although the population in each well remains completely fixed, the order parameter evolves in time and exhibit spatial oscillations. In order to analyze such a dynamics we first investigate the evolution of the density profile. Using the BON state expression given by Eq. (\[bon1\]), the evolution of the density $\rho_{M}({\mathbf r},t)= |\psi_{M} ({\mathbf r},t) |^2$ within the M model is given by $$\begin{gathered}
\frac{\partial \rho_{M}({\mathbf r},t)}{\partial t} =
2 \sqrt{n_0n_1}\dot{f_0}(t)\, \sin f_0(t)\, \\
\times [{w}_0(\mathbf{r})-{w}_2(\mathbf{r})][{w}_1(\mathbf{r})-{w}_{-1}(\mathbf{r})],
\label{gdro}\end{gathered}$$ with $ \hbar \dot{f_0}(t) = U_{\text{eff}} \Delta N $ (cf. Eq.(\[f0\])). Equation (\[gdro\]) implies that $\rho_{M}({\mathbf r},t)$ is approximately stationary within each well, where the overlap between the WL functions of neighboring sites is negligible. Whereas the density variations are confined to the inter-well regions or junctions where the localized states do overlap. Moreover, one can infer the change of sign of $\partial \rho_{M}({\mathbf r},t) / \partial t $ at the junctions by analyzing Eq. (\[gdro\]). One can thus conclude that particles oscillate across both junctions of a given site without changing its net population. Furthermore, the maximum and minimum density variations during the evolution occur at times $t_M$ and $t_m$ when $f_0(t_M)= 0 $ and $f_0(t_m)= \pi$, respectively.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
![\[fig:phase\] Phase snapshots at the $z=0$ plane obtained from the M model (left column) and from GP simulations (right column) for $\Delta N= 200$. The coordinates $x$ and $y$ are divided by $ l_r=\sqrt{ \hbar/(m \omega_r)} $. The GP times, from top to bottom of the right (panel/column), correspond to : $ t_a=3.4 \omega_r^{-1} $, $ t_b=6.9 \omega_r^{-1}$, $ t_c=10.3 \omega_r^{-1} $, and $ t_d=13.7 \omega_r^{-1} $. The plus signs (empty circles) indicate the vortex (antivortex) locations. The indicated phase values correspond to the local phases evaluated at each site center.](fig3_t1m.pdf "fig:"){width="0.5\columnwidth"} ![\[fig:phase\] Phase snapshots at the $z=0$ plane obtained from the M model (left column) and from GP simulations (right column) for $\Delta N= 200$. The coordinates $x$ and $y$ are divided by $ l_r=\sqrt{ \hbar/(m \omega_r)} $. The GP times, from top to bottom of the right (panel/column), correspond to : $ t_a=3.4 \omega_r^{-1} $, $ t_b=6.9 \omega_r^{-1}$, $ t_c=10.3 \omega_r^{-1} $, and $ t_d=13.7 \omega_r^{-1} $. The plus signs (empty circles) indicate the vortex (antivortex) locations. The indicated phase values correspond to the local phases evaluated at each site center.](fig3_t1g.pdf "fig:"){width="0.5\columnwidth"}
![\[fig:phase\] Phase snapshots at the $z=0$ plane obtained from the M model (left column) and from GP simulations (right column) for $\Delta N= 200$. The coordinates $x$ and $y$ are divided by $ l_r=\sqrt{ \hbar/(m \omega_r)} $. The GP times, from top to bottom of the right (panel/column), correspond to : $ t_a=3.4 \omega_r^{-1} $, $ t_b=6.9 \omega_r^{-1}$, $ t_c=10.3 \omega_r^{-1} $, and $ t_d=13.7 \omega_r^{-1} $. The plus signs (empty circles) indicate the vortex (antivortex) locations. The indicated phase values correspond to the local phases evaluated at each site center.](fig3_t2m.pdf "fig:"){width="0.5\columnwidth"} ![\[fig:phase\] Phase snapshots at the $z=0$ plane obtained from the M model (left column) and from GP simulations (right column) for $\Delta N= 200$. The coordinates $x$ and $y$ are divided by $ l_r=\sqrt{ \hbar/(m \omega_r)} $. The GP times, from top to bottom of the right (panel/column), correspond to : $ t_a=3.4 \omega_r^{-1} $, $ t_b=6.9 \omega_r^{-1}$, $ t_c=10.3 \omega_r^{-1} $, and $ t_d=13.7 \omega_r^{-1} $. The plus signs (empty circles) indicate the vortex (antivortex) locations. The indicated phase values correspond to the local phases evaluated at each site center.](fig3_t2g.pdf "fig:"){width="0.5\columnwidth"}
![\[fig:phase\] Phase snapshots at the $z=0$ plane obtained from the M model (left column) and from GP simulations (right column) for $\Delta N= 200$. The coordinates $x$ and $y$ are divided by $ l_r=\sqrt{ \hbar/(m \omega_r)} $. The GP times, from top to bottom of the right (panel/column), correspond to : $ t_a=3.4 \omega_r^{-1} $, $ t_b=6.9 \omega_r^{-1}$, $ t_c=10.3 \omega_r^{-1} $, and $ t_d=13.7 \omega_r^{-1} $. The plus signs (empty circles) indicate the vortex (antivortex) locations. The indicated phase values correspond to the local phases evaluated at each site center.](fig3_t3m.pdf "fig:"){width="0.5\columnwidth"} ![\[fig:phase\] Phase snapshots at the $z=0$ plane obtained from the M model (left column) and from GP simulations (right column) for $\Delta N= 200$. The coordinates $x$ and $y$ are divided by $ l_r=\sqrt{ \hbar/(m \omega_r)} $. The GP times, from top to bottom of the right (panel/column), correspond to : $ t_a=3.4 \omega_r^{-1} $, $ t_b=6.9 \omega_r^{-1}$, $ t_c=10.3 \omega_r^{-1} $, and $ t_d=13.7 \omega_r^{-1} $. The plus signs (empty circles) indicate the vortex (antivortex) locations. The indicated phase values correspond to the local phases evaluated at each site center.](fig3_t3g.pdf "fig:"){width="0.5\columnwidth"}
![\[fig:phase\] Phase snapshots at the $z=0$ plane obtained from the M model (left column) and from GP simulations (right column) for $\Delta N= 200$. The coordinates $x$ and $y$ are divided by $ l_r=\sqrt{ \hbar/(m \omega_r)} $. The GP times, from top to bottom of the right (panel/column), correspond to : $ t_a=3.4 \omega_r^{-1} $, $ t_b=6.9 \omega_r^{-1}$, $ t_c=10.3 \omega_r^{-1} $, and $ t_d=13.7 \omega_r^{-1} $. The plus signs (empty circles) indicate the vortex (antivortex) locations. The indicated phase values correspond to the local phases evaluated at each site center.](fig3_t4m.pdf "fig:"){width="0.5\columnwidth"} ![\[fig:phase\] Phase snapshots at the $z=0$ plane obtained from the M model (left column) and from GP simulations (right column) for $\Delta N= 200$. The coordinates $x$ and $y$ are divided by $ l_r=\sqrt{ \hbar/(m \omega_r)} $. The GP times, from top to bottom of the right (panel/column), correspond to : $ t_a=3.4 \omega_r^{-1} $, $ t_b=6.9 \omega_r^{-1}$, $ t_c=10.3 \omega_r^{-1} $, and $ t_d=13.7 \omega_r^{-1} $. The plus signs (empty circles) indicate the vortex (antivortex) locations. The indicated phase values correspond to the local phases evaluated at each site center.](fig3_t4g.pdf "fig:"){width="0.5\columnwidth"}
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The sense of the particles flow across the junctions can be read off from the spatial profiles of the phases $\phi(\mathbf{r},t)$ of the wavefunction. In Fig. \[fig:phase\] we show snapshots of these phases at several times in the $z=0$ plane obtained from both $\psi_M ({\mathbf r},t)$ and $\psi_{\text{GP}}({\mathbf r},t) $ in the left and right panels, respectively. In both cases we have subtracted a global phase $\phi_0(t)$ from $\phi(\mathbf{r},t)$ in order to better observe the dynamics. The initial condition is $ \Delta N=200$ and $f_0= - \pi $, which yield a multimode period $ T_{M} \simeq 13.8 \omega_r^{-1}$, in sharp contrast to $2 \pi \hbar / (U \Delta N)= 9.95 \omega_r^{-1} $ that would be obtained with the bare onsite interaction.
In the left column, from top to bottom, we show the phase $ \phi_M({\mathbf r},t) $ obtained from the order parameter $\psi_M ({\mathbf r},t) $ for the aforementioned configurations at several times: a) at $t=T_M/4$ ($f_0=-\pi/2$), there is a $\pi/2$ difference between neighboring sites and the velocity field corresponds to that of a vortex with a phase gradient in the counterclockwise direction, b) at $t=T_M/2$ ($f_0=0$), the phase difference between the right and left sites is $\pi$, which corresponds to a vanishing velocity field, c) at $t=3T_M/4$ ($f_0=\pi/2$), there is a $-\pi/2$ difference between neighboring sites, being the circulation clockwise as for an antivortex. Finally, d) at $t=T_M$ ($f_0=\pi$), there is a $\pi$ phase difference between the top and bottom sites. In the figure we have marked with a plus symbol and with an empty circle the presence of a vortex and an antivortex, respectively. For the M model, it can be seen that, in the left column of Fig. \[fig:phase\], there exists a vortex and an antivortex at the origin for the configurations: a) $t=T_{M}/4$ and c) $t= 3/4 T_{M}$, in agreement with distributions described above. In the model, the vortex (antivortex) remains fixed at $x=0,y=0$ during the interval $ 0 < t < T_{M}/2$ ($ T_{M}/2 < t < T_{M}$).
On the other hand, on the right column of Fig. \[fig:phase\] we show phase snapshots obtained from full 3D GP simulations for times near the four different situations previously discussed. We have observed that the GP evolutions incorporate additional fluctuations and hence the velocity circulation does not change exactly at quarters of the period $T_M$. Moreover, the velocity field never vanishes, as the change of its circulation is associated with a passage of vortices instead of with the appearance of a nodal surface [@abad11]. Nevertheless, as shown together in Fig. \[fig:phase\], the order parameter from the M model is able to capture rather accurately the spatial distribution of phases present in the exact GP dynamics.
In particular, from top to bottom in Fig. \[fig:phase\], we show the results for the GP times: $ t_a=3.4 $$\omega_r^{-1} $, $ t_b=6.9
$$\omega_r^{-1}$, $ t_c=10.3 $$\omega_r^{-1} $, and $
t_d=13.7 $$\omega_r^{-1} $. In each site we indicate the value of the local phase $ \phi_{\text{GP}}({\mathbf r},t) $ evaluated at the center of the corresponding well to be compared with that obtained in the M model. It may be confirmed that at every time the phase difference between alternated sites is always $\pi$ as predicted by the model.
It becomes clear from the change of sign in the phase differences that the velocity field is inverted near each half period, when the extreme variations in the density at the junctions are achieved. Except for some fluctuations around such a transition, in the intermediate times the total topological charge is conserved, whereas the number and the position of the vortices may change. In particular, in the third row of the right column of Fig. \[fig:phase\], one vortex and two antivortices are observed with a total negative charge of $-1$ instead of the single fixed antivortex predicted by the M model.
It is worthwhile to recall that the velocity circulation is quantized along any closed curved inside the superfluid and, as established in the celebrated Helmholtz-Kelvin theorem [@landau95], it is conserved during the evolution if the superfluid condition is not broken [@bogdan03]. As a consequence, the value of the circulation can only change when a vortex passes through the curve (phase slip) or when the density goes to zero.
Although both the GP equation and the M model must obey the Helmholtz-Kelvin theorem, the order parameter given by the multimode model cannot predict the motion of vortices or the generation of vortex-antivortex pairs, hence the change of the velocity field circulation could be only provided through the appearance of nodal surfaces. The nodal surfaces arise when the minimum in the local density is achieved, i.e., at $f_0 =0, \pi$. For example, at $ f_0= 0$ the order parameter in Eq. (\[bon1\]) reduces to $$\psi_M ({\mathbf r}) =\sqrt{n_0}[ w_0 ({\mathbf r})- w_2({\mathbf r})] - \sqrt{n_1}
[ w_1 ({\mathbf r})- w_{-1} ({\mathbf r})],
\label{orderwi0f0=0}$$ which corresponds to the configuration b) on the left column of Fig. \[fig:phase\]. If all the populations were equal this condition would lead to the $x=0$ plane. In our case, the deviation from a plane is due to the difference in the populations. The intersection of the nodal surface with the plane $z=0$ can be viewed in the graph by the sharp $\pi$ change of the phase where the density goes to zero. Similarly, one can obtain the nodal surfaces for $f_0=\pi$, which corresponds to the configuration d). In this case the curve where the density goes to zero is around $ y=0$.
In contrast with the M model, the change of the velocity circulation in the GP frame is produced by the dynamics of vortices passing through the potential barriers and may include generation of vortex-antivortex pairs. In fact, we have observed that several vortex-antivortex pairs may be spontaneously generated along the barriers, thus simulating a density closer to that of the M model nodal surface. This active dynamics of vortices around the transitions is produced in a timescale much smaller than $ T_M$ and hence it is not possible to access the details of the vortex motion within the present numerical precision. As an illustration, we note that the last time of the depicted GP snapshots is slightly smaller than the $T_M$ period and there still exists an antivortex around the center of the system.
### Velocity field circulation
Taking into account the previous findings for the multimode model one can conclude that in one $T_M$ period the system passes through a sequence of phases that yields an alternating velocity field circulation between values $1$ and $-1$ along a curve that connects the four wells. The transition between these two values occurs at $ f_0= 0$ and $ f_0= \pi $ when the order parameter develops a nodal surface. In Fig. \[fig:circu\] we show the velocity field circulation $\mathcal{C}=\oint\mathbf{v}\cdot d\mathbf{r}$, as a function of time using the M model and GP simulations. It may be seen that the same behavior is observed with both approaches. The M model is thus able to reproduce the behavior of the circulation although the details of the internal vortex dynamics is lost. In the GP dynamics the change of circulation is caused by the motion of vortices together with the creation or annihilation of vortex-antivortex pairs. Signatures of such a vortex dynamics could be observed in Fig. \[fig:phase\] where we have shown the phases around the transition. Another evidence of a vortex dynamics can also be visualized in the middle panel of Fig. \[fig:circu\], where an additional change of sign is produced near the transition.
![\[fig:circu\] (color online) Velocity field circulation $\mathcal{C}$ (in units of $2\pi\hbar/m$) as a function of time for $\Delta N=100, 200$, and $400$ (from top to bottom). The circles correspond to the GP results while the solid line to the results from the M model. The circulation was calculated along a square that connects the centers of the four sites in the $z=0$ plane.](fig4_circ1.pdf "fig:"){width="0.85\columnwidth"}\
![\[fig:circu\] (color online) Velocity field circulation $\mathcal{C}$ (in units of $2\pi\hbar/m$) as a function of time for $\Delta N=100, 200$, and $400$ (from top to bottom). The circles correspond to the GP results while the solid line to the results from the M model. The circulation was calculated along a square that connects the centers of the four sites in the $z=0$ plane.](fig4_circ3.pdf "fig:"){width="0.85\columnwidth"}\
![\[fig:circu\] (color online) Velocity field circulation $\mathcal{C}$ (in units of $2\pi\hbar/m$) as a function of time for $\Delta N=100, 200$, and $400$ (from top to bottom). The circles correspond to the GP results while the solid line to the results from the M model. The circulation was calculated along a square that connects the centers of the four sites in the $z=0$ plane.](fig4_circ2.pdf "fig:"){width="0.85\columnwidth"}
### Stability analysis
In this section we investigate the stability of the BON states by means of a Floquet analysis [@Floquet; @mauro4p] of the multimode dynamical equations. This analysis is based on the characterization of the linear dynamics around its periodic orbits. In our case, the BON states are periodic solutions with constant populations $n_i(t)=n_i$ and linear phase differences $\varphi_i(t)= \varphi_i^0 + (-1)^{i+1} 2\pi\, {t}/{T_M}$ where $\varphi_i^0$ fulfill the relation: $\varphi_0^0=-f_0(0), \varphi_1^0=f_0(0)-\pi, \varphi_2^0=2\pi-f_0(0),
\varphi_{-1}^0=f_0(0)-\pi$. The linearization of the dynamics around these states yield the non-autonomous system $$\frac{d\bm{\delta}}{dt}=\mathbb{A}\left[n_i(t),\varphi_i(t)\right]\Bigr|_{\text{BON}}\cdot\bm{\delta}(t)
\label{eq:dEq}$$ where $\bm{\delta}$ is a vector comprising both density and phase-difference fluctuations. As the BON states correspond to symmetric initial populations with peculiar phases, it is natural to consider as variables $\bm{\delta}$ the departures from a symmetric case, namely, we define $$\begin{aligned}
\delta_1 &= (n_0-n_2)/2, &\delta_2= (n_1-n_{-1})/2, \\
\delta_3 &= (\varphi_0-\varphi_2)/2 + \pi, &\delta_4=(\varphi_1-\varphi_{-1})/2.\end{aligned}$$ Given that the matrix $\mathbb{A}$ has a period $T_M$, the linearized dynamics can be characterized by the so-called Monodromy matrix $\mathbb{M}$ which contains the change of $\bm{\delta}$ after one period, i.e., $\mathbb{M}\cdot\bm{\delta}(0)=\bm{\delta}(T_M)$. The matrix is built from the solutions of Eq. (\[eq:dEq\]) with canonical initial conditions evaluated at $T_M$ [@Floquet; @mauro4p]. In Fig. \[fig:Mono\] we depict elements of $\mathbb{M}$ showing the effect of an initial population fluctuation. The orbits are regular if the perturbed system remains near the initial one after a period. This happens when $\mathbb{M}_{ii}\simeq 1$ and $\mathbb{M}_{i\neq j}\simeq 0$. On the contrary, when the fluctuations are enhanced ($|\mathbb{M}_{ij}|\gg 1$), the orbits are unstable. This may be observed in Fig. \[fig:Mono\] for low imbalances.
![\[fig:Mono\] Selected elements of the Monodromy matrix $\mathbb{M}_{ij}$ as functions of the particle imbalance $N_1-N_2$ of BON states with $f_0(0)=\pi$. The horizontal dashed lines mark the values $\mathbb{M}_{ij}=0, 1$.](fig5.pdf){width="0.9\columnwidth"}
For the peculiar stationary states ($\Delta N=0$), the linear system is time-independent and the problem reduces to a straightforward diagonalization of $\mathbb{A}$ to obtain the excitation frequencies $\tilde{\omega}$ corresponding to the Bogoliubov collectives modes in the case of the full GPE. The four frequencies are found to be $$\tilde{\omega} = \pm \sqrt{F^2\,\cos^2f_0 \pm K \frac{N U_{\text{eff}}}{2}\cos f_0 -(K+F)^2}
\label{eq:omegaEx}$$ where $K=2J+F$. As $N U_{\text{eff}}\gg K, F$, the most stable frequency for a given system is attained for peculiar states with $f_0=\pm\pi/2$ which in turn yield an imaginary frequency $\tilde{\omega}^2 = -(K+F)^2$. Therefore all $f_0$ give rise to dynamically unstable peculiar states. The stability of stationary vortex states ($f_0=\pm \pi/2$) has been previously investigated in [@Paraoanu2003] for circular arrays of BECs, finding that only states with circulation below $N_c/4$ are stable.
### Proposed experimental test
The correct preparation of BON states requires a special sequence of phases and symmetric initial populations ($n_{k}=n_{k+1}$). While the common approach to experimentally measure both of them is by means of TOF and absorption images, the simple dynamics of BON states offers an alternative way to confirm its correct realization using TOF images only. Given that the relative phases among neighboring sites are revealed in the interference patterns during the TOF expansion [@albiez05], it could be verified that they obey the peculiar sequence of phases at all times. According to Eq. (\[f0\]), in this case $f_0(t)$ must be a linear function whose slope $\gamma$ relates to the particle imbalance as $$\Delta N=\frac{\hbar\gamma}{U_{\mathrm{eff}}},
\label{imbalance}$$ which might probe to be a more accurate measure than the direct estimate from absorption images. On the other hand, since Eq. (\[imbalance\]) requires the use of $U_{\mathrm{eff}}$ instead of the bare $U$, it may also serve to confirm its numerical value. By using $U$ the relative error on the imbalances could be as large as of order 20-30%, depending on the number of particles [@mauro17].
Due to the experimental uncertainty, absorption images may not be able to reveal a slightly broken symmetry of the population configuration. However, the evolution of the phases will depart from linearity and will not be determined by the single function $f_0$.
Extension to larger number of wells {#larger}
====================================
It is possible to extend the peculiar and BON states to larger number of wells provided the sequence of phases $ ...0,f_0 -\pi, \pi, f_0, 0...$ is repeated $l=N_c/4$ times around the ring lattice, and the populations alternate between two values, with $n_{2k}=n_0 $ and $n_{2k+1}=n_1 $. This is only possible when the number of wells are multiples of 4. Taking into account these conditions in Eq. (\[orderparameter\]) and using Eq. (\[wannier\]) to eliminate the WL functions $w_k$, we can write the following BON order parameter in terms of GP stationary states, $$\begin{aligned}
\psi_M ({\mathbf r}) &=& \frac{\sqrt{N_c}}{2} \left[ ( \sqrt{n_0} + i \sqrt{n_1} e^{i f_0(t)} )
\psi_{\frac{N_c}{4}} ({\mathbf r})\right. \nonumber \\
&+& \left. ( \sqrt{n_0} - i \sqrt{n_1} e^{i f_0(t)} ) \psi_{-\frac{N_c}{4}}({\mathbf r}) \right] \, .
\label{gbon2}\end{aligned}$$ It is straightforward to show that $f_0(t)$ still obeys Eq. (\[f0\]), and thus the corresponding time period is also given by Eq. (\[period\]). Therefore, the analysis performed in the previous section can be repeated using the same procedure, including the Floquet theory. However, for these configurations the velocity field circulation alternates between $ \pm N_c/4$ and the number of nodal surfaces at each half period is equal to $l$. Equation (\[gbon2\]) shows that an arbitrary linear combination of $\psi _{\pm \frac{N_c}{4}}$ leads to the BON dynamics. For example, even though for $N_c=8$ it is not possible to generate the BON dynamics with a linear combination of the degenerate $\psi_{\pm 1}$ states; any linear combination of $\psi _{\pm 2}$ will indeed give rise to a BON dynamics.
Using Eq. (\[lz2\]) the mean value of the $z$-component of the angular momentum is given by, $$\langle L_z \rangle (t) = 2 N_c \hbar \langle w_1 | \frac{\partial}{\partial \theta} | w_{0} \rangle
\sqrt{n_0 n_{1}} \sin ( f_0(t) ).
\label{lznc}$$
If we let $n_0=n_1$ then we obtain the most general quasi-stationary states described in section IV.A: $$\begin{aligned}
\psi_M ({\mathbf r}) &=& \frac{1}{2} \left[ ( 1 + i e^{i f_0} )
\psi_{\frac{N_c}{4}} ({\mathbf r})\right. \nonumber \\
&+& \left. ( 1 - i e^{i f_0} ) \psi_{-\frac{N_c}{4}}({\mathbf r}) \right] \, .
\label{peculiar general}\end{aligned}$$ that satisfies $$\begin{gathered}
\left[ -\frac{ \hbar^2}{2m} \nabla^2 + V_{\text{trap}} +
g \, |\psi_M (\mathbf{r})|^2 \right] \psi_M ({\mathbf r}) = \mu_{\frac{N_c}{4}} \, \psi_M ({\mathbf r}) \\
- g N \cos(f_0) \Im\left( \psi_{\frac{N_c}{4}}^2({\mathbf r})\right) \left[ \Re ( \psi_{\frac{N_c}{4}} ) - \Im (\psi_{\frac{N_c}{4}}) e^{i f_0} \right]
\label{gened2}\end{gathered}$$ Since $$\begin{aligned}
\Im \left( \psi_{\frac{N_c}{4}}^2\right) &=& \frac{1}{N_c}\sum _{k,k'}w_k w_{k'} \sin \left [\frac{\pi}{2}(k+k')\right ] \nonumber \\
\label{cuasiN}\end{aligned}$$ the states Eq. (\[peculiar general\]) can be regarded as quasi-stationary solutions of the GP equation when the $w_k$ are well localized functions.
Summary and concluding remarks {#sum}
===============================
We have studied a particular dynamical regime of a Bose-Einstein condensate in a ring-shaped lattice which possesses a set of states with fixed number of particles in each site and a simple dynamics in their phases. The same distribution of phases along the sites that gives rise to such nonstationary states has been shown to generate a continuous family of stationary points in the phase space of the multimode model. Such peculiar states have constant nonzero angular momentum, when all the populations are equal, and include two states that correspond to exact GP stationary solutions.
We have shown that the nonlinearity of the GP equation governs the dynamics within this regime and that it is responsible for the population blocking in the nonstationary states. In contrast to the self-trapping phenomenon this effect does not possess a lower bound for the population imbalance.
We have studied the time evolution of BON states using both the multimode model and the three-dimensional GP equation finding an excellent agreement in the populations in each site and in their phase differences. This accuracy was possible due to the inclusion of the effective interaction energy parameter instead of the bare one. Even though the multimode model was unable to account for the motion of individual vortices and the creation/annihilation of vortex-antivortex pairs, it was demonstrated that it correctly predicts the evolution of the velocity circulation and angular momentum, characterizing this regime as a persistent current oscillating around the lattice.
By performing a Floquet stability analysis of the blocked populations states, we have verified that their dynamics is regular for the particle imbalances here considered. In a four-well system these states could, in principle, be experimentally achieved by initially manipulating the position of the potential barriers in order to have different populations or by using an elliptic trap in the $ (x,y)$ plane with their axis forming a $\pi/4$ angle during a short time and then reverting the potential to a circular harmonic trap. A simple way to produce the initial distribution of phases would be to start with the same state as we have used in our numerical calculations. This could be achieved by illuminating half of the condensate (e.g., $x>0$ ) with an additional laser for a period of time until it develops a $\pi$ phase difference between the half spaces $x>0$ and $x<0$. However, any other initial distribution of phases seems feasible using a Spatial Light Modulator (SLM) [@slm1; @slm2; @slm3], and hence also the whole family of stationary M-model states could be directly generated. Furthermore, given that all the phases loose their dependence on a single linear function as soon as the symmetric condition on the site populations is lifted, these states could be first tested to adjust the population in alternate wells with arbitrary imbalances. A second phase imprinting application could then be used to generate the desired state. Since the BON states present a simple analytical form for the phase difference between neighboring sites, it could also allow to measure the initial population imbalance by means on interference patterns in TOF images, rather than absorption images.
Parameters
===========
The multimode model parameters are defined by
$$J= -\int d^3{\bf r}\,\, w_0 ({\bf r}) \left[
-\frac{ \hbar^2 }{2 m}{\bf \nabla}^2 +
V_{\text{trap}}({\bf r})\right] w_1({\bf r}),
\label{jota0}$$
$$U= g \int d^3{\bf r}\,\, w_0^4({\bf r}), \quad \text{and}
\label{U0}$$
$$F= - N \,g\int d^3{\bf r}\,\, w_0^3({\bf r})
w_1 ({\bf r}).
\label{jotap0}$$
Together with the calculation of these parameters by the preceding definitions we have followed the alternative method outlined in Ref. [@jezek13b] which involves directly the energies of the GP stationary states. Both approaches have proven to yield values equal in less than one percent. We note that we have disregarded the parameter that involves products of neighboring densities because, for the present system, its contribution turned out to be negligible.
This work was supported by CONICET and Universidad de Buenos Aires through grants PIP 11220150100442CO and UBACyT 20020150100157BA, respectively.
[99]{} A. Smerzi, S. Fantoni, S. Giovanazzi, and S. R. Shenoy, Phys. Rev. Lett. **79**, 4950 (1997). S. Raghavan, A. Smerzi, S. Fantoni, and S. R. Shenoy, Phys. Rev. A **59**, 620 (1999). D. Ananikian and T. Bergeman, Phys. Rev. A **73**, 013604 (2006). X. Y. Jia, WeiDong Li, and J. Q. Liang, Phys. Rev. A **78**, 023613 (2008). M. Mel' e-Messeguer, B. Juliá-Díaz, M. Guilleumas, A. Polls and A. Sanpera, New J. Phys. **13**, 033012 (2011). M. Abad, M. Guilleumas, R. Mayol, M. Pi, and D. M. Jezek, Europhys. Lett. **94**, 10004 (2011). M. Nigro, P. Capuzzi, H. M. Cataldo, and D. M. Jezek, Eur. Phys. J. D **71**, 297 (2017). T. Mayteevarunyoo, B. A. Malomed, and G. Dong, Phys. Rev. A **78**, 053601 (2008); B. Xiong, J. Gong, H. Pu, W. Bao, and B. Li, Phys. Rev. A **79**, 013626 (2009); Qi Zhou, J. V. Porto, and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. A **84**, 031607 (2011); B. Cui, L.C. Wang, and X. X. Yi, Phys. Rev. A **82**, 062105 (2010); M. Abad, M. Guilleumas, R. Mayol, M. Pi, and D. M. Jezek, Phys. Rev. A **84**, 035601 (2011). M. Albiez, R. Gati, J. Fölling, S. Hunsmann, M. Cristiani, and M. K. Oberthaler, Phys. Rev. Lett. **95**, 010402 (2005). Michael Albiez, *Observation of Nonlinear Tunneling of a Bose-Einstein Condensate in a Single Josephson Junction* (PhD thesis), University of Heidelberg, 2005 Rudolf Gati, *Bose-Einstein Condensates in a Single Double Well Potential* (PhD thesis), University of Heidelberg, 2007. Th. Anker, M. Albiez, R. Gati, S. Hunsmann, B. Eiermann, A. Trombettoni, and M. K. Oberthaler, Phys. Rev. Lett. **94**, 020403 (2005).
Bingbing Wang, Panming Fu, Jie Liu, and Biao Wu, Phys. Rev. A **74**, 063610 (2006).
C. E. Creffield, Phys. Rev. A **75**, 031607(R) (2007). Ju-Kui Xue, Ai-Xia Zhang, and Jie Liu, Phys. Rev. A **77**, 013602 (2008). T. J. Alexander, E. A. Ostrovskaya, and Y. S. Kivshar, Phys. Rev. Lett. **96**, 040401 (2006). Bin Liu, Li-Bin Fu, Shi-Ping Yang, and Jie Liu, Phys. Rev. A **75**, 033601 (2007).
S. K. Adhikari, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. **44**, 075301 (2011).
S. De Liberato and C. J. Foot, Phys. Rev. A **73**, 035602 (2006). Geva Arwas, Amichay Vardi, and Doron Cohen, Phys. Rev. A **89**, 013601 (2014). M. Nigro, P. Capuzzi, H. M. Cataldo, and D. M. Jezek, Phys. Rev. A **97**, 013626 (2018). D. M. Jezek, P. Capuzzi, and H. M. Cataldo, Phys. Rev. A **87**, 053625 (2013).
D. M. Jezek and H. M. Cataldo, Phys. Rev. A **88**, 013636 (2013). R. Kolovsky, New J. Phys. **8**, 197 (2006). A. Gallemí, M. Guilleumas, J. Martorell, R. Mayol, A. Polls, and B. Juliá-Díaz, New J. Phys. **18**, 075005 (2016). A. Burchianti, C. Fort, and M. Modugno, Phys. Rev. A **95**, 023627 (2017). K. Henderson, C. Ryu, C. MacCormick, and M. G. Boshier, New J. Phys. [**1**1]{}, 043030 (2009). H. M. Cataldo and D. M. Jezek, Phys. Rev. A **84**, 013602 (2011). E. P. Gross, Nuovo Cimento [**20**]{}, 454 (1961); L. P. Pitaevskii, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. [**40**]{}, 646 (1961) \[Sov. Phys. JETP **13**, 451 (1961)\]. D. M. Jezek and H. M. Cataldo, Phys. Rev. A **83**, 013629 (2011). L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, [*[Fluid Mechanics]{}*]{} New York: Butterworth-Heinemann (1995). D. Bogdan and S. Krzysztof, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. **36**, 2339 (2003). C. Chicone, Ordinary Differential Equations with Applications, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York, 2006). Gh.-S. Paraoanu, Phys. Rev. A **67**, 023607 (2003). S. Burger, K. Bongs, S. Dettmer, W. Ertmer, K. Sengstock, A. Sanpera, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. **83**, 5198 (1999). J. Denschlag, J. E. Simsarian, D. L. Feder, C. W. Clark, L. A. Collins, J. Cubizolles, L. Deng, E. W. Hagley, K. Helmerson, W. P. Reinhardt, S. L. Rolston, B. I. Schneider, and W. D. Phillips, Science **287**, 97 (2000), http://science.sciencemag.org/content/287/5450/97. Avinash Kumar, Romain Dubessy, Thomas Badr, Camilla De Rossi, Mathieu de Goer de Herve, Laurent Longchambon, and Helene Perrin, arXiv:1801.04792.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'In this paper, we discuss the inverse problem for a mixed Liénard type nonlinear oscillator equation $\ddot{x}+f(x)\dot{x}^2+g(x)\dot{x}+h(x)=0$, where $f(x),\,g(x)$ and $h(x)$ are arbitrary functions of $x$. Very recently, we have reported the Lie point symmetries of this equation. By exploiting the interconnection between Jacobi last multiplier, Lie point symmetries and Prelle-Singer procedure we construct a time independent integral for the case exhibiting maximal symmetry from which we identify the associated conservative non-standard Lagrangian and Hamiltonian functions. The classical dynamics of the nonlinear oscillator is also discussed and certain special properties including isochronous oscillations are brought out.'
author:
- 'Ajey K. Tiwari'
- 'S. N. Pandey'
- 'V. K. Chandrasekar'
- 'M. Senthilvelan'
- 'M. Lakshmanan'
date: 'Received: date / Accepted: date'
title: The inverse problem of a mixed Liénard type nonlinear oscillator equation from symmetry perspective
---
Introduction
============
In general, the Lagrangian of an autonomous dynamical system is defined as the difference between kinetic and potential energies [@gold; @gre; @arn]. Systems which have Lagrangians of this form are termed as natural/standard Lagrangians. However, recent studies reveal that certain autonomous dynamical systems do admit other forms of Lagrangians in which no such clear identification of kinetic and potential energy terms can be made. In other words these new forms of Lagrangians do not have separate kinetic or potential energy terms. However, they provide the same equation of motion as that of Newton’s equation of motion. These new forms of Lagrangians are termed as non-standard Lagrangians [@cari; @vkc5]. The associated Hamiltonians are also called non-standard Hamiltonians where the canonically conjugate momenta assume quite non-standard forms. A well known example which admits non-standard Lagranigan/Hamiltonian is the damped harmonic oscillator [@glad11; @glad] or the well known Mathews-Lakshmanan oscillator [@pmm]. Subsequent investigations have shown that several dynamical systems do admit non-standard Lagrangians [@mus; @mus3; @vkc]. Subsequently, attempts have also been made to quantize these non-standard Hamiltonians through various procedures [@chit; @chit1; @partha2; @nuccinew; @chi].
Recently, a few alternative approaches have been considered to derive standard as well as non-standard Lagrangians for nonlinear dynamical systems [@vkc5; @nuccinew]. For a class of nonlinear oscillator equations the Jacobi last multiplier can often be utilized to derive the Lagrangian. The connection between Jacobi last multiplier and the Lagrangian was introduced by Jacobi [@partha; @jac; @jac2] and the potential applicability of this method has been brought out only recently by Nucci and her collaborators [@nucci; @nucci2; @nucci3]. To identify the multiplier one needs at least two distinct Lie point symmetries of the underlying equation of motion. The knowledge of Lie point symmetries then plays an important role in identifying the Lagrangian for the given nonlinear system [@nucci; @nucci2; @nucci3]. From a different perspective, we have shown that for one degree of freedom systems one can also identify time independent Hamiltonian from the time independent integral itself [@vkc6]. Identifying a time independent integral for a nonlinear dynamical system is itself a nontrivial problem. To overcome this problem, in this paper, we propose a method of deriving integral of motion when the Lie point symmetries are known. The underlying algorithm is as follows. From the known Lie point symmetries, we obtain the so called null forms and integrating factors associated with a given dynamical equation by utilizing the recently proposed interconnections between the null forms, integrating factors, Lagrange multiplier and Prelle-Singer procedure [@vkc3; @vkc2; @anna_third]. The null forms and integrating factors are then utilized to derive the integrals which in turn lead to the corresponding Lagrangian and Hamiltonian of the system. The procedure prescribed here is applicable for a class of systems of the form $$\begin{aligned}
\ddot x=\phi(x,\dot x),\label{met1}\end{aligned}$$ where over dot stands for differentiation with respect to $t$. The only assumption here is that Eq. (\[met1\]) should admit atleast two parameter Lie point symmetries. To illustrate this idea, we consider an equation belonging to the mixed Liénard type equation [@akt], that is $$\begin{aligned}
\ddot{x}+f(x)\dot{x}^2+g(x)\dot{x}+h(x)=0,\label{int111}\end{aligned}$$ where $f(x),\,g(x)$ and $h(x)$ are all arbitrary functions of $x$. Specifically, in this paper, we consider the following integrable dynamical system admitting maximal number of eight symmetries, as deduced in Ref. [@akt], $$\begin{aligned}
\ddot{x}+f(x)\dot{x}^2&+\left(k_1\Im(x)+k_2\right)\dot{x}+\frac{1}{F(x)}\left[\frac{k_1^2}{9}\Im(x)^3 \right. \nonumber\\
&\left. +\frac{k_1k_2}{3}\Im(x)^2+k_3\,\Im(x)+k_4\right]=0,\, F(x)=e^{\int{f(x)dx}},\,\Im(x)=\int{F(x)dx},\label{int4}\end{aligned}$$ where ${k_i}^{'}s,\,i=1,2,3,4,$ are arbitrary parameters and $k_4=-\frac{2k_2^3}{9k_1}+\frac{k_2k_3}{k_1}$. Obviously Eq. (\[int4\]) belongs to the family (\[int111\]). Recently, some special cases of the above equation have been analyzed in the literature in different perspectives, see for example Refs.[@new1; @new2]. In this work, we consider a more generalized equation which encompasses all those special cases. Moreover establishing a conservative Hamiltonian description for a generalized equation like (\[int4\]) is a tedious task and we have succeeded in getting that from the symmetries itself.
The plan of the paper is as follows. In Sec. 2, we briefly discuss the method of identifying suitable Lagrangian and Hamiltonian for the given second order ODE (\[int4\]). The Lagrangian and Hamiltonian description of Eq. (\[int4\]) are discussed in Sec. 3. In Sec. 4, we discuss the dynamical properties associated with (\[int4\]) and prove its isochronicity. Finally, conclusion is given in Sec. 5.
Methodology for the identification of Lagrangian
================================================
In this section, we discuss the method for identifying Lagrangian for a second order ODE of the form (\[met1\]).
First integral and Lagrangian
-----------------------------
In this section, we briefly recall the extended PS procedure [@vkc2], which is one of the versatile tools to derive integrating factors and first integrals for the nonlinear second order ODEs, and introduce a method to obtain the corresponding Lagrangian and Hamiltonian.
Let us consider a second order ODE of the form $\ddot{x}=\phi(x,\dot{x})$, given by Eq. (\[met1\]). We assume, that this ODE admits a first integral $I(t,x,\dot{x})=C$, where C is a constant, on the solutions. If $S(t,x,\dot{x})$ and $R(t,x,\dot{x})$ denote the null form and integrating factor for the second order ODE (\[met1\]), then they can be determined from the relations (for more details one may refer [@vkc2])
\[ps\] $$\begin{aligned}
D[S]&=-\phi_{x}+S\phi_{\dot{x}}+S^{2},\label{ps8}\\
D[R]&=-R(S+\phi_{\dot{x}}), \label{ps9} \\
R_{x}&=R_{\dot{x}}S+RS_{\dot{x}}. \label{ps10}\end{aligned}$$
Solving (\[ps\]) one can obtain the expressions for $S$ and $R$. Once they are determined the associated integral can be obtained by evaluating the following expression [@vkc2], that is $$\begin{aligned}
I(t,x,\dot{x}) & = G-\int \left( RS+\frac{d}{dx}G \right) dx-\int \Biggl\{R +\frac{d}{d\dot{x}} \left[G- \int \left(RS+\frac{d}{dx}G\right)dx\right]\Biggl\}d\dot{x}.
\label{ps11}\end{aligned}$$ where $G=\int R(\phi+\dot{x}S)dt$. Once we know the first integral we can obtain the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian corresponding to the equation with the help of the following method.
Suppose the given equation admits a time independent integral $I$ then one can associate it with a Hamiltonian [@vkc6] through the Legendre transform, namely $$\begin{aligned}
I(x,\dot{x}) = H(x,p) = p \dot{x}-L(x,\dot{x}),\label{mlin13}\end{aligned}$$ where $L(x,\dot{x})$ is the Lagrangian and $p$ is the canonically conjugate momentum. From (\[mlin13\]), we can deduce $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{\partial{I}}{\partial\dot{x}} = \frac{\partial{p}}{\partial\dot{x}} \dot{x}, \quad
\frac{\partial{I}}{\partial{x}} = \frac{\partial{p}}{\partial{x}}\dot{x}-\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{x}}.\label{mlin13a}\end{aligned}$$ Identifying without loss of generality $p$ and $L$ from (\[mlin13a\]), we find $$\begin{aligned}
p &=\int \frac{I_{\dot{x}}}{\dot{x}} d\dot{x},\nonumber\\
L &= \int (p_x\dot{x}-I_{x})dx + \int [p-\frac{d}{d\dot{x}}\int (p_x\dot{x}-I_{x})dx]d\dot{x}.\label{mlin13b}\end{aligned}$$ Using expressions (\[mlin13\])-(\[mlin13b\]) we can obtain the expressions for the Lagrangian, the canonically conjugate momentum and the associated Hamiltonian.
Hence, from the above study it is clear that once we know the expressions for the null form and integrating factor we can obtain the first integral that will lead to the Lagrangian/Hamiltonian of the system. However, in some cases, it is difficult to solve the determining equations for the null forms and integrating factor. To overcome this difficulty, we analyze the recently established interconnections between the Lie point symmetries, null form, integrating factor and Jacobi multiplier that will directly give the expressions for the null form and integrating factor.
Exploring the interconnections
------------------------------
(i) Lie symmetries and null forms {#i-lie-symmetries-and-null-forms .unnumbered}
---------------------------------
Let us consider the Lie point symmetry generator of (\[met1\]) be $V=\xi\partial_t+\eta\partial_x$, where $\xi(t,x)$ and $\eta(t,x)$ are the symmetry functions. The second prolonged vector field of $V$ is given by $V^{(2)}(=\xi\partial_t+\eta\partial_x+\eta^{(1)}\partial_{\dot{x}}+\eta^{(2)}\partial_{\ddot{x}}),$ where $\eta^{(1)}$ and $\eta^{(2)}$ are the first and second prolongations of the vector field $V$ [@olver]. Here, $\eta^{(1)}=\dot{\eta}-\dot{x}\dot{\xi}$ and $\eta^{(2)}=\ddot{\eta}-\ddot{x}\dot{\xi}$. The infinitesimal symmetries $\xi$ and $\eta$ can be determined by imposing the invariance of the equation of motion (\[met1\]) under the infinitesimal transformation $T=t+\epsilon \xi(t,x)$ and $X=x+\epsilon \eta(t,x)$ or equivalently $$\begin{aligned}
V^{(2)}[\ddot{x}-\phi(t,x,\dot{x})]\mid_{\ddot{x}-\phi(t,x,\dot{x})=0}=0.\label{num1}\end{aligned}$$ Alternatively, the above invariance condition can be formulated in terms of the characteristic of $V$, that is $Q(=\eta-\dot{x}\xi)$ as $$D^2[Q]=\phi_{\dot{x}} D[Q]+\phi_x Q.\label{met16}$$ Solving Eq. (\[met16\]) we can get $Q$ from which we can extract Lie point symmetries $\xi$ and $\eta$ with appropriate restrictions on $Q$.
Now, introducing the following transformation to the null function, $$S=-D[X]/X\label{sx},$$ Eq.(\[ps8\]) becomes a linear equation in the new variable $X$, that is $$D^2[X] = \phi_{\dot{x}} D[X]+\phi_x X,\label{met14}$$ where $D$ is the total differential operator. Comparing Eqs.(\[met14\]) and (\[met16\]) we find that $$X=Q.\label{xq}$$ Interestingly, the $S$-determining equation (\[met14\]) is exactly the same as that of the determining equation for the Lie point symmetries (\[met16\]). Since $S=-\frac{D[X]} {X}$, the null form $S$ can also be determined once $\xi$ and $\eta$ are known (for more details one may refer [@vkc3]).
(ii) Integrating factor and Jacobi last multiplier {#ii-integrating-factor-and-jacobi-last-multiplier .unnumbered}
--------------------------------------------------
To get the interconnection between the Jacobi last multiplier and integrating factor we rewrite Eq. (\[met1\]) into an equivalent system of two first-order ODEs $\dot{x}_i=w_i(x_1,x_2)$, $i=1,2$. Then its Jacobi last multiplier $M$ is obtained by solving the following differential equation [@nucci3], $$\frac{\partial M}{\partial t}+\sum_{i=1}^2\frac{\partial (Mw_i)}{\partial x_i}=0\label{met18}.$$ The above equation can be rewritten as $$D[\log M]+\phi_{\dot{x}}=0.\label{met20}$$ Introducing now the following transformation for the integrating factor $$R=X/F,\label{rxf}$$ where $F(t,x,\dot{x})$ is a function to be determined, in Eq. (\[ps9\]) we can rewrite the latter as $$D[F] = \phi_{\dot{x}}F.
\label{met15}$$ Now comparing Eq. (\[met15\]) with (\[met20\]) we find that $F=M^{-1}$. Thus from the knowledge of the multiplier $M=\big(\frac{1} {\Delta}\big)$ we can also fix the explicit form of $F$ which appears in the denominator of integrating factor $R$ (vide Eq.(\[rxf\])) as $F=\Delta$ or vice versa. Here, the multiplier $M$ of a second order ODE can be obtained as [@vkc3] $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{1}{M}=\Delta=\left|
\begin{matrix}
1 & \dot{x} & \ddot{x} \\
\xi_1 & \eta_1 & \eta_1^{(1)} \\
\xi_2 & \eta_2 & \eta_2^{(1)}
\end{matrix} \right|,\label{int2.1}\end{aligned}$$ where, $(\xi_1,\eta_1)$ and $(\xi_2,\eta_2)$ are two sets of Lie point symmetries of the ODE (\[met1\]) and $\eta_1^{(1)}$ and $\eta_2^{(1)}$ are their corresponding first prolongations, that is $\eta_i^{(1)}=\dot{\eta_i}-\dot{x}\dot{\xi_i},\,i=1,2$.
We also note here that once the Jacobi last multiplier is found the Lagrangian can be constructed directly from the relation $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{\partial^2L}{\partial \dot{x}^2}=\frac{1}{\Delta}=M.\label{int2.2}\end{aligned}$$ Integrating the multiplier two times with respect to $\dot{x}$ we can obtain a Lagrangian for the given equation. However, as we see below, the obtained Lagrangians for some problems turn out to be too messy and it is difficult to use the underlying expression.
Lagrangian and Hamiltonian description of Eq. (\[int4\])
========================================================
In this section, we illustrate the effectiveness of the procedure discussed in the previous section by identifying the non-standard Lagrangian and Hamiltonian for Eq. (\[int4\]).
Time independent integral
-------------------------
Eq. (\[int4\]) is invariant under the following two Lie point symmetries [@akt], namely
\[ggg\] $$\begin{aligned}
\xi_1&=1,\qquad \eta_1=0.\label{sym4.1}\\
\xi_2&=-\frac{k_1\Im(x)+k_2}{3k_3-k_2^2},~~
\eta_2=\frac{k_1\Im(x)+k_2}{k_1F(x)}+\frac{\left(k_1\Im(x)+k_2\right)^3}{3k_1F(x)\left(3k_3-k_2^2\right)},\label{sym4}\end{aligned}$$
where $F(x)=e^{\int{f(x)dx}}$ and $\Im(x)=\int{F(x)dx}$. One may also consider the other Lie point symmetries of Eq. (\[int4\]) to derive the Lagrangian. Since we are interested to explore the time independent integrals we consider only these two symmetries. To determine the null forms we consider the Lie point symmetries (\[sym4.1\]) from which we can fix $Q=\eta-\dot x \xi=-\dot{x}$. Substituting the latter expression and its derivative in (\[sx\]), we readily obtain $$\begin{aligned}
S=\frac{f\dot{x}^2+(k_1\Im+k_2)\dot{x}+\frac{k_1^2}{9}\frac{\Im^3}{F}+\frac{k_1k_2}{3}\frac{\Im^2}{F}+\frac{k_3\Im}{F}+\frac{k_4}{F}}{\dot{x}},\label{int02.21}\end{aligned}$$ where $k_4=\frac{9k_2k_3-2k_2^3}{9k_1F}$. From the knowledge of $S,\,X$ and the Lie point symmetries (\[sym4.1\]) we can find the integrating factor $R$ to be of the form (see Eq. (\[rxf\])) $$\begin{aligned}
R=\frac{54k_1^2F^2(k_2-3k_3)\dot{x}}{P_1P_2},\label{int1012.21}\end{aligned}$$ where $P_1$ and $P_2$ are given as
\[sym7-8\] $$\begin{aligned}
P_1&=&\left((3k_1F(x)\dot{x}+\left(k_1\Im(x)+k_2\right)^2\right)^2-3\left(k_2^2-3k_3\right)\left(k_1\Im(x)+k_2\right)^2,\label{sym7}\\
P_2&=&(k_1\Im(x)+k_2)^2-3(k_2^2-3k_3)+3k_1F(x)\dot{x}.\label{sym8}\end{aligned}$$
The integral of motion of (\[int4\]) can now be obtained by substituting (\[int02.21\]) and (\[int1012.21\]) in (\[ps11\]) and evaluating the integrals. Doing so, we find a time independent integral $$\begin{aligned}
I_1=\frac{P_1}{P_2^2},\label{int02.22}\end{aligned}$$ where $P_1$ and $P_2$ are given in (\[sym7-8\]).
Conservative Lagrangian/Hamiltonian
-----------------------------------
To derive the time independent Lagrangian and Hamiltonian from the first integral (\[int02.22\]), we first determine the canonical momentum from the first integral (\[int02.22\]). Substituting the latter in the first of the relations in (\[mlin13b\]) and integrating the resultant expression, we find $$\begin{aligned}
p&=-\frac{27\lambda^3}{2k_1}\left(\frac{F(x)}{\left(k_1F(x)\dot{x}+\frac{k_1^2}{3}\left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}+\Im(x)\right)^2+3\lambda\right)^2}\right)+\frac{3\lambda}{2k_1}F(x),\label{ch5.a6}\end{aligned}$$ where $\lambda=k_3-\frac{k_2^2}{3}$. Once $p$ is known the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian can be determined by evaluating the expression (\[mlin13b\]). Our result shows ($\lambda>0$) $$\begin{aligned}
L&=\frac{27\lambda^3}{2k_1^2}\left(\frac{1}{k_1F(x)\dot{x}+\frac{k_1^2}{3}\left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}+\Im(x)\right)^2+3\lambda}\right)+\frac{3\lambda}{2k_1}F(x)\dot{x}-\frac{9\lambda^2}{2k_1^2}\label{ch5.a5}\end{aligned}$$ and $$\begin{aligned}
H=\frac{9\lambda^2}{2}\left[\frac{\left(F(x)\dot{x}+\frac{k}{3}\left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}+\Im(x)\right)^2\right)^2+\lambda \left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}+\Im(x)\right)^2}{\left(k_1F(x)\dot{x}+\frac{k_1^2}{3}\left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}+\Im(x)\right)^2+3\lambda\right)^2}\right],\label{ch5.a7.1}\end{aligned}$$ or $$\begin{aligned}
H=\frac{9\lambda^2}{2k_1^2}\left[2-\frac{2k_1p}{3\lambda F}-2\,\left(1-\frac{2k_1p}{3\lambda F}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}+\frac{k_1^2}{9\lambda}\left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}+\Im(x)\right)^2\right.
\left. \left(1-\frac{2k_1p}{3\lambda F}\right)\right].\label{ch5.a7.2}\end{aligned}$$ One may observe that both the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian are of non-standard forms. One can check that the Euler-Lagrange equation of motion derived from (\[ch5.a5\]) and the Hamiltonian equation of motions derived from (\[ch5.a7.1\]) coincide with that of Eq. (\[int4\]). For the case $\lambda<0$ Eq. (\[int4\]) admits the same Lagrangian and Hamiltonian descriptions given by Eqs. (\[ch5.a5\]) and (\[ch5.a7.1\]) or (\[ch5.a7.2\]), respectively, provided that one has to replace $\lambda$ with $-\mid \lambda \mid$ in the respective places in Eqs. (\[ch5.a5\]) and (\[ch5.a7.1\]) or (\[ch5.a7.2\]).
Alternative Lagrangian
----------------------
As we pointed out in the previous section, the Lagrangian can also be determined by determining Jacobi last multiplier $M$ (see Eq. (\[int2.2\])). Substituting the Lie point symmetries (\[ggg\]) in (\[int2.1\]) and evaluating the determinant, we find
$$\begin{aligned}
M&=&\frac{1}{27k_1^2(k_2^2-3k_3)F(x)^2}\Bigl[\left(k_1\Im(x)+k_2\right)\left(\left(k_1\Im(x)+k_2\right)^2-3(k_2^2-3k_3)\right) \Bigl\{\left(k_1\Im(x)+k_2\right)\nonumber \\
&&\left(\left(k_1\Im(x)+k_2\right)^2-3(k_2^2-3k_3)\right)+9k_1F(x)\dot{x}\left(k_1\Im(x)+k_2+f(x)\dot{x}\right)\Bigr\}\nonumber \\
&&+9k_1F(x)\dot{x}^2\Bigl\{3k_1F(x)\left(\left(k_1\Im(x)+k_2\right)^2-(k_2^2-3k_3)+k_1F(x)\dot{x}\right)\nonumber \\ &&
-f(x)\left(k_1\Im(x)+k_2\right)\left(\left(k_1\Im(x)+k_2\right)^2-3(k_2^2-3k_3)\right)\Bigr\}\Bigr],\label{sym5}\end{aligned}$$
where $F=e^{\int{f(x)dx}}$ and $\Im(x)=\int{F(x)dx}$. Substituting the multiplier $M$ in Eq. (\[int2.2\]) and integrating it twice with respect to $\dot{x}$, we obtain $$\begin{aligned}
L&=\frac{1}{2P_3} \left[P_2\ln{\frac{P_1}{P_2^2}}-\frac{6\sqrt{3}k_1F(x)\sqrt{k_2^2-3k_3}}{k_1\Im(x)+k_2}\right.\left. \times\tanh^{-1}\left\{\frac{(k_1\Im(x)+k_2)^2+3k_1F(x)\dot{x}}{\sqrt{3}(k_1\Im(x)+k_2)\sqrt{k_2^2-k_3}}\right\}\right],\label{sym6}\end{aligned}$$ where $P_3=(k_1\Im(x)+k_2)^2-3(k_2^2-3k_3)$. One can check that Eq. (\[sym6\]) is another non-standard Lagrangian for Eq. (\[int4\]).
Hamiltonian Dynamics of Eq. (\[int4\])
======================================
For the present problem, it is very difficult to obtain the second integral either through PS procedure or by recalling the interconnections so as to obtain the explicit solutions and study the underlying dynamics. It is also clear from the form of Eq. (\[int4\]) that it cannot be integrated directly. So we have to follow another procedure to obtain the solution and explore its underlying dynamics. Since the equation has a conservative Hamiltonian description the best way to do this is to identify a canonical transformation which can transform the complicated Hamiltonian into a simple Hamiltonian from which the solutions can be obtained. After a careful analysis we identified a canonical transformation that transforms the Hamiltonian (\[ch5.a7.1\]) into a harmonic oscillator type Hamiltonian.
Introducing the canonical transformation $$\begin{aligned}
\int{e^{\int{f(x)dx}}dx}&=-\frac{k_2}{k_1}+\frac{U}{1-\frac{k_1}{3\lambda}P},\nonumber\\
p&=P e^{-\int{f(x)dx}}\left(1-\frac{k_1}{6\lambda}P\right),\label{ch5.a8}\end{aligned}$$ where $P=\dot{U}$, the Hamiltonian (\[ch5.a7.1\]) can be transformed to the linear harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian $H=\frac{1}{2}\left(P^2+\lambda U^2\right)$. It is clear that the parameter $\lambda$ fixes the ultimate dynamics of the dynamical system (\[int4\]). We consider all the three cases, namely $(i)\,\lambda>0,\,(ii)\,\lambda<0$ and $(iii)\,\lambda=0$ and bring out the underlying dynamics of Eq. (\[int4\]).
Case $(i)\,{\lambda>0}$
------------------------
In the first case $\lambda>0$, we have $\ddot U+\lambda U=0$ which upon integration gives $U=A\sin(\omega t+\delta)$, where $A$ and $\delta$ are arbitrary constants. From the solution of the latter we arrive at the following sinusoidal solution for Eq. (\[int4\]) of the form $$\begin{aligned}
\int{e^{\int{f(x)dx}}dx}=-\frac{k_2}{k_1}+\frac{A\sin{(\omega t+\delta)}}{1-(\frac{k_1}{3\omega})A\cos{(\omega t+\delta)}},\label{int40}\end{aligned}$$ where $ 0\leq A <\frac{3\omega}{k_1},\,\,\omega=\sqrt{\lambda}$ and $A=\frac{\sqrt{2H}}{\omega}$ and $\delta$ is an arbitrary constant. It is to be noted that the above general solution admits harmonic periodic solutions and that the frequency of the periodic oscillations is completely independent of the amplitude or initial condition. Consequently, the underlying system turns out to be an isochronous one. This surprising result is not a common feature for nonlinear oscillators.
Case (ii)${\lambda<0}$
-----------------------
For the case $\lambda<0$, Eq. (\[int4\]) admits the same Lagrangian and Hamiltonian descriptions given by Eqs. (\[ch5.a5\]) and (\[ch5.a7.1\]) or (\[ch5.a7.2\]), respectively. The only difference here is that one has to replace $\lambda$ with $-\mid \lambda \mid$ in the respective places in Eqs. Eqs. (\[ch5.a5\]) and (\[ch5.a7.1\]) or (\[ch5.a7.2\]). Hence, the solution for Eq. (\[int4\]) for the case $\lambda<0$ can be written by solving the underlying equation of motion which in turn provides us the solution of (\[int4\]) in the form $$\begin{aligned}
\int{e^{\int{f(x)dx}}dx}=-\frac{k_2}{k_1}+\frac{3\alpha\left(e^{\alpha\left(t-\delta\right)}-2Ee^{-\alpha\left(t-\delta\right)}\right)}{3\alpha+k_1\left(e^{\alpha\left(t-\delta\right)}+2Ee^{-\alpha\left(t-\delta\right)}\right)},\label{int41}\end{aligned}$$ where $H=E,\,\alpha=\sqrt{\lvert{\lambda}\rvert}$ and $\delta $ is a constant. The above solution admits decaying type or aperiodic solutions only. The dissipative nature of the system is clear from (\[int41\]).
Case $(iii)\,{\lambda=0}$
--------------------------
Finally, we consider the case $\lambda=0$. In this case the Hamiltonian can be written as $$\begin{aligned}
\hat{H}&=\frac{k_1}{3}\,p\,\left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}+\int{e^{\int{f(x)dx}}dx}\right)^2e^{-\int{f(x)dx}}-2\sqrt{-\frac{1}{k_1}\,p\,e^{-\int{f(x)dx}}},\label{int42}\end{aligned}$$ where $$\begin{aligned}
p=-\frac{k_1e^{\int{f(x)dx}}}{\left(k_1e^{\int{f(x)dx}}\dot{x}+\frac{k_1^2}{3}\left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}+\int{e^{\int{f(x)dx}}dx}\right)^2\right)^2}.\label{int43}\end{aligned}$$ For this case we identify the canonical transformation as $$\begin{aligned}
U&=\sqrt{\frac{6}{k_1}\,p\,e^{-\int{f(x)dx}}},\nonumber\\
P&=\frac{1}{3}\sqrt{\frac{6}{k_1}\,p\,e^{-\int{f(x)dx}}}\left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}+\int{e^{\int{f(x)dx}}dx}\right).\label{cat1a}\end{aligned}$$ The canonical transformation (\[cat1\]) transforms (\[int42\]) to a freely falling particle Hamiltonian $H=\frac{P^2}{2}-\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}U$. Consequently the general solution to (\[int4\]) for $\lambda=0$ can be given as $$\begin{aligned}
\int{e^{\int{f(x)dx}}dx}=-\frac{k_2}{k_1}+\frac{3}{k_1}\left(\frac{2\,\left(t+I_1\right)}{\left(t+I_1\right)^2-3E}\right),\qquad H=E,\end{aligned}$$ where $I_1$ is a constant.
Examples:
=========
We have shown above that system (\[int4\]) exhibits time independent non-standard Lagrangian and Hamiltonian structures and also proved its isochronous nature for arbitrary form of the function $f(x)$. The implications can be easily appreciated by considering specific forms for the function $f(x)$. Here, in this section, we obtain time independent Lagrangian and conservative Hamiltonian for two specific choices of $f(x)$.
$f(x)=\frac{2\alpha x}{1+\alpha x^2}$
-------------------------------------
For the choice $f(x)=\frac{2\alpha x}{1+\alpha x^2}$, Eq. (\[int4\]) takes the form $$\ddot{x}+\frac{2\alpha x}{1+\alpha x^2}\dot{x}^2+\bigg(k_1 \bigg(x+\frac{\alpha x^3}{3}\bigg)+k_2\bigg)\dot{x}+\frac{1}{1+\alpha x^2}\bigg[\frac{k_1^2}{9}\bigg(x+\frac{\alpha x^3}{3}\bigg)^3+\frac{k_1 k_2}{3}\bigg(x+\frac{\alpha x^3}{3}\bigg)^2+k_3\bigg(x+\frac{\alpha x^3}{3}\bigg)+k_4\bigg]=0,\label{exm1}$$ where we choose $k_4=-\frac{2k_2^3}{9k_1}+\frac{k_2k_3}{k_1}$. The conventional prediction about Eq. (\[exm1\]) is that, it is of dissipative nature. However, using the results given in Sec. 2, we can prove that the system (\[exm1\]) is of conservative nature and displays the explicit forms of the time independent Lagrangian and Hamiltonian. The underlying expressions are given by
$$\begin{aligned}
L&=\frac{27\lambda^3}{2k_1^2}\left(\frac{1}{k_1(1+\alpha x^2)\dot{x}+\frac{k_1^2}{3}\left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}+x+\frac{\alpha x^3}{3}\right)^2+3\lambda}\right)+\frac{3\lambda}{2k_1}(1+\alpha x^2)\dot{x}-\frac{9\lambda^2}{2k_1^2}\label{exm5}\\
H&=\frac{9\lambda^2}{2}\left[\frac{\left((1+\alpha x^2)\dot{x}+\frac{k}{3}\left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}+x+\frac{\alpha x^3}{3}\right)^2\right)^2+\lambda \left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}+x+\frac{\alpha x^3}{3}\right)^2}{\left(k_1(1+\alpha x^2)\dot{x}+\frac{k_1^2}{3}\left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}+x+\frac{\alpha x^3}{3}\right)^2+3\lambda\right)^2}\right].\label{exm7.2}\end{aligned}$$
It is clear from the forms of $L$ and $H$ that both are of non-standard type as the $x$ and $p$ components are mixed up such that is one can not make a clear distinction between the kinetic and potential energy terms. Due to such form its seems difficult to predict the dynamics of the system completely. However, using the canonical transformation
\[ch5.aa8\] $$\begin{aligned}
x+\frac{\alpha x^3}{3}&=-\frac{k_2}{k_1}+\frac{U}{1-\frac{k_1}{3\lambda}P},\\
p(1+\alpha x^2)&=P \left(1-\frac{k_1}{6\lambda}P\right),\end{aligned}$$
we can transform the above Hamiltonian to that of the linear harmonic oscillator equation from which the solution for Eq. (\[exm1\]) can be written for three different choices as follows.
Case $(i)$: $k_3>0$ {#case-i-k_30 .unnumbered}
-------------------
For $k_3>0$ the form of the solution (\[int40\]) for the equation (\[exm1\]) turns out to be $$\begin{aligned}
x+\frac{\alpha x^3}{3}=-\frac{k_2}{k_1}+\frac{A\sin{(\omega t+\delta)}}{1-(\frac{k_1}{3\omega})A\cos{(\omega t+\delta)}},\label{int401}\end{aligned}$$ Solving the above equation, we get three roots. In fact, we have only one real root and it is given by $$\begin{aligned}
x(t)=\frac{2^{\frac{1}{3}}}{(-3\beta \alpha^2+(\sqrt{4\alpha^3+9\beta^2\alpha^4}))^{\frac{1}{3}}}-\frac{(-3\beta \alpha^2+(\sqrt{4\alpha^3+9\beta^2\alpha^4}))^{\frac{1}{3}} }{2^{\frac{1}{3}}\alpha},\end{aligned}$$ where $\beta=-\frac{k_2}{k_1}+\frac{A\sin{(\omega t+\delta)}}{1-(\frac{k_1}{3\omega})A\cos{(\omega t+\delta)}}$, $0\leq A <\frac{3\omega}{k_1}$ and $\omega=\sqrt{k_3}$. It is clear from the form of the solution that the dynamics of Eq. (\[exm1\]) for $k_3>0$ is periodic and the frequency of the oscillations is independent of amplitude, that is the system is isochronous.
Case $(ii)$: $k_3<0$ {#case-ii-k_30 .unnumbered}
--------------------
For $k_3<0$, the solution for Eq. (\[exm1\]) can be written as $$\begin{aligned}
x(t)=\frac{2^{\frac{1}{3}}}{(-3\gamma \alpha^2+(\sqrt{4\alpha^3+9\gamma^2\alpha^4}))^{\frac{1}{3}}}-\frac{(-3\gamma \alpha^2+(\sqrt{4\alpha^3+9\gamma^2\alpha^4}))^{\frac{1}{3}} }{2^{\frac{1}{3}}\alpha},\label{int41a}\end{aligned}$$ where $\gamma=-\frac{k_2}{k_1}+\frac{3\alpha\left(e^{\alpha\left(t-\delta\right)}-2Ee^{-\alpha\left(t-\delta\right)}\right)}{3\alpha+k_1\left(e^{\alpha\left(t-\delta\right)}+2Ee^{-\alpha\left(t-\delta\right)}\right)}$, $H=E,\,\alpha=\sqrt{\lvert{\lambda}\rvert}$ and $\delta $ is a constant. Here also we have three roots for Eq.(\[exm1\]). We have considered only the real root. The form of the solution suggests decaying type or aperiodic solution for Eq. (\[exm1\]).
Case $(ii)$: $k_3=0$ {#case-ii-k_30-1 .unnumbered}
--------------------
For the choice $k_3=0$, the Hamiltonian can be written as $$\begin{aligned}
\hat{H}&=\frac{k_1}{3}\,\left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}+x+\frac{\alpha x^3}{3}\right)^2\frac{p}{1+\alpha x^2}-2\sqrt{-\frac{1}{k_1}\,\frac{p}{1+\alpha x^2}},\label{int42a}\end{aligned}$$ where $$\begin{aligned}
p=-\frac{k_1(1+\alpha x^2)}{\left(k_1(1+\alpha x^2)\dot{x}+\frac{k_1^2}{3}\left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}+x+\frac{\alpha x^3}{3}\right)^2\right)^2}.\label{int43a}\end{aligned}$$ For this case we identify the canonical transformation as
\[cat1\] $$\begin{aligned}
U&=\sqrt{\frac{6}{k_1}\,\frac{p}{1+\alpha x^2}},\\
P&=\frac{1}{3}\sqrt{\frac{6}{k_1}\,\frac{p}{1+\alpha x^2}}\left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}+x+\frac{\alpha x^3}{3}\right).\end{aligned}$$
The canonical transformation (\[cat1\]) transforms (\[int42\]) to a freely falling particle Hamiltonian $H=\frac{P^2}{2}-\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}U$. Consequently, the general solution to (\[exm1\]) for $k_3=0$ can be given as $$\begin{aligned}
x=\frac{2^{\frac{1}{3}}}{(-3a_1(t) \alpha^2+(\sqrt{4\alpha^3+9a_1(t)^2\alpha^4}))^{\frac{1}{3}}}-\frac{(-3a_1(t) \alpha^2+(\sqrt{4\alpha^3+9a_1(t)^2\alpha^4}))^{\frac{1}{3}} }{2^{\frac{1}{3}}\alpha},\quad H=E,\label{aaa112}\end{aligned}$$ where $a_1(t)=-\frac{k_2}{k_1}+\frac{3}{k_1}\left(\frac{2\,\left(t+I_1\right)}{\left(t+I_1\right)^2-3E}\right)$ and $I_1$ is a constant. The front-like form of the solution is clear from Eq. (\[aaa112\]).
Hence, we can conclude that Eq. (\[exm1\]) exhibits both conservative and front-like like behaviours depending on the value of the parameter $k_3$. For $k_3>0$ Eq. (\[exm1\]) exhibits isochronous nature; however for $k_3\leq 0$ we get front-like nature.
$f(x)=0$
--------
For this choice, Eq. (\[int4\]) becomes modified Emden equation, that is $$\begin{aligned}
\ddot{x}+k_1x\dot{x}+\frac{k_1^2}{9}x^3+k_3x=0,\label{exma1}\end{aligned}$$ where we have chosen $k_2=0$. The above equation is well known in the literature and has been studied by many authors in different perspectives [@cari; @vkc5; @chit; @partha2; @subha]. Using the results given in Sec. 3, we can write expressions for time independent Lagrangian and Hamiltonian as
$$\begin{aligned}
L&=\frac{27k_3^3}{2k_1^2}\left(\frac{1}{k_1\dot{x}+\frac{k_1^2}{3}x^2+3k_3}\right)
+\frac{3k_3}{2k_1}\dot{x}-\frac{9k_3^2}{2k_1^2},\label{exma5}\\
H&=\frac{9k_3^2}{2k_1^2}\left[2-\frac{2k_1p}{3k_3 }-2\,\left(1-\frac{2k_1p}{3k_3}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}
+\frac{k_1^2}{9k_3}x^2 \left(1-\frac{2k_1p}{3k_3x}\right)\right],\\
p&=-\frac{27\lambda^3}{2k_1}\left(\frac{1}{\left(k_1\dot{x}+\frac{k_1^2}{3}\left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}+x\right)^2+3\lambda\right)^2}\right)
+\frac{3\lambda}{2k_1}.
\label{exma7.2}\end{aligned}$$
Using the canonical transformation
\[ach5.aa8\] $$\begin{aligned}
x&=\frac{U}{1-\frac{k_1}{3k_3}P},\\
p&=P\left(1-\frac{k_1}{6k_3}P\right),\end{aligned}$$
we can transform the above Hamiltonian to linear harmonic oscillator equation from which the solution for Eq. (\[exma1\]) can be written for three different choices as follows.
Case $(i)$: $k_3>0$ {#case-i-k_30-1 .unnumbered}
-------------------
For $k_3>0$ the solution turns out to be of the form [@vkc5] $$\begin{aligned}
x(t)=\frac{A\sin{(\omega t+\delta)}}{1-(\frac{k_1}{3\omega})A\cos{(\omega t+\delta)}},\end{aligned}$$ where $0\leq A <\frac{3\omega}{k_1}$ and $\omega=\sqrt{k_3}$. It is clear from the form of the solution that the dynamics of Eq. (\[exma1\]) for $k_3>0$ is periodic and the frequency of the oscillations is independent of amplitude, that is the system is isochronous.
Case $(ii)$: $k_3<0$ {#case-ii-k_30-2 .unnumbered}
--------------------
For $k_3>0$, the solution for Eq. (\[exma1\]) can be written as [@vkc5] $$\begin{aligned}
x(t)=\frac{3\alpha\left(e^{\alpha\left(t-\delta\right)}-2Ee^{-\alpha\left(t-\delta\right)}\right)}{3\alpha+k_1\left(e^{\alpha\left(t-\delta\right)}+2Ee^{-\alpha\left(t-\delta\right)}\right)},\label{aint41a}\end{aligned}$$ where $H=E,\,\alpha=\sqrt{\lvert{\lambda}\rvert}$ and $\delta $ is a constant. The form of the solution suggests decaying/front-like type solutions for Eq. (\[exma1\]).
Case $(ii)$: $k_3=0$ {#case-ii-k_30-3 .unnumbered}
--------------------
For the choice $k_3=0$, the Hamiltonian can be written as $$\begin{aligned}
\hat{H}&=\frac{k_1}{3}{px^2}-2\sqrt{-\frac{p}{k_1}},\label{aint42a}\end{aligned}$$ where $$\begin{aligned}
p=-\frac{k_1}{\left(k_1\dot{x}+\frac{k_1^2}{3}x^2\right)^2}.\label{aint43a}\end{aligned}$$ For this case we identify the canonical transformation as
\[acat1\] $$\begin{aligned}
U&=\sqrt{\frac{6}{k_1}\,p},\\
P&=\frac{1}{3}\sqrt{\frac{6}{k_1}\,p}\,\,x.\end{aligned}$$
The canonical transformation (\[acat1\]) transforms (\[aint42a\]) to a freely falling particle Hamiltonian $H=\frac{P^2}{2}-\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}U$. Consequently, the general solution to (\[exma1\]) for $k_3=0$ can be given as $$\begin{aligned}
x(t)=\frac{3}{k_1}\left(\frac{2\,\left(t+I_1\right)}{\left(t+I_1\right)^2-3E}\right),\qquad H=E,\label{aaaa112}\end{aligned}$$ where $I_1$ is a constant. The dissipative form of the solution is clear from Eq. (\[aaaa112\]).
Hence, we can conclude that Eq. (\[exma1\]) exhibits both conservative and dissipative like behaviour depending on the value of the parameter $k_3$. For $k_3>0$ Eq. (\[exma1\]) exhibits isochronous nature; however for $k_3\leq 0$ we get dissipative nature.
Comparison with other methods
=============================
In Ref.[@mus2], Musielak has given the conditions to obtain the nonstandard Lagrangian of the form $$L(x,\dot{x})=\frac{1}{H(x)\dot{x}+G(x)x}\label{lag1}$$ for the equation of motion $$\ddot{x}+f(x)\dot{x}^2+g(x)\dot{x}+h(x)x=0,\label{eq121}$$ provided the following condition is satisfied $$\frac{2}{3}g(x)=\frac{d}{dt}(3x\frac{h(x)}{g(x)})+3xf(x)\frac{h(x)}{g(x)},\label{eq2m2}$$ following the earlier work on MEE equation [@vkc5]. The functions $H(x)$ and $G(x)$ are given by $$H(x)=e^{I_f(x)}, G(x)=3\frac{h(x)}{g(x)}e^{I_f(x)}$$ with $$I_f(x)=\int f(x) dx.$$ A similar approach is also given by Cie$\acute{s}$linski and Nikiciuk in Ref.[@mus2new]. We have applied the conditions given in Refs. [@mus2] and [@mus2new] to the present case of Eq.(\[int4\]). This equation as well as the examples $1$ and $2$ (vide Eqs.(\[exm1\]) and (\[exma1\])) satisfy the above condition (\[eq2m2\]) and yields the same form of Lagrangian (\[lag1\]) (upto a constant multiple). However, in the present work, we have also brought out the interconnections in a systematic way and obtained the isochronous solutions.
Conclusion
==========
In this paper, we have discussed the nonstandard Lagrangian and Hamiltonian structures of an isochronous nonlinear oscillator equation (\[int4\]) belonging to the mixed type Liénard equation. We have utilized the interrelation between the Jacobi last multiplier method and Lie point symmetries and obtained the associated Lagrangian. However, the obtained Lagrangian is found to be too complicated. Hence, we utilized the interconnection between the PS method and last multiplier and obtained a time independent integral for Eq. (\[int4\]) which in turn gives the nonstandard Lagrangian and Hamiltonian for Eq (\[int4\]). Further, we have shown that the obtained Hamiltonian for Eq. (\[int4\]) can be transformed to the Hamiltonian of a linear harmonic oscillator through appropriate canonical transformation from which we obtained the solution for Eq. (\[int4\]). We have also shown that the system exhibits isochronous nature of oscillations for $\lambda>0$. We have also compared our results with the other existing methods and confirmed their correctness. The identification of such systems are of considerable interest from practical applications as many of these equations are of [*PT*]{}-symmetric type. Also, it is of considerable interest to consider the quantization of the system (\[int4\]) and its generalization to higher dimensions. Hence, we believe that exploring such nonlinear equations will be highly rewarding in understanding general nonlinear systems.
Acknowledgments
===============
AKT is very grateful to Centre for Nonlinear Dynamics, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli-620024 for warm hospitality. The work of VKC is supported by the SERB-DST Fast Track scheme for young scientists under Grant No. YSS/2014/000175. The work of MS forms part of a research project sponsored by Department of Science and Technology, Government of India. The work of ML is supported by a DAE Raja Ramanna Fellowship.
Goldstein, H., Poole Jr, C.P., Safko, J.L.: Classical Mechanics, Pearson Education, India (2011).
Greiner, W.: Classical Mechanics: Systems of Particles and Hamiltonian Dynamics, Springer, New York (2004).
Arnold, V.I.: Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Springer, New York (1978).
Carinena, J.F., Ranada, M.F., Santander, F.: Lagrangian formalism for nonlinear second-order Riccati systems: One-dimensional integrability and two-dimensional superintegrability, J. Math. Phys. **46**, 062703 (2005).
Chandrasekar, V.K., Senthilvelan, M., Lakshmanan, M.: Unusual Liénard-type nonlinear oscillator, Phys. Rev. E. **72**, 066203 (2005).
Chandrasekar, V.K., Senthilvelan, M., Lakshmanan, M.: On the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian description of the damped linear harmonic oscillator, J. Math. Phys. **48**, 032701 (2007).
Gladwin Pradeep, R., Chandrasekar, V.K., Senthilvelan, M., Lakshmanan, M.: Nonstandard conserved Hamiltonian structures in dissipative/damped systems: Nonlinear generalizations of damped harmonic oscillator, J. Math. Phys. **50**, 052901 (2009).
Mathews, P.M., Lakshmanan, M.: On a unique nonlinear oscillator. Quart. Appl. Math. **32**, 215 (1974).
Musielak, Z.E.: Standard and non-standard Lagrangians for dissipative dynamical systems with variable coefficients, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. **41**, 055205 (2008).
Musielak, Z.E., Roy, D., Swift, L.D.: Method to derive Lagrangian and Hamiltonian for a nonlinear dynamical system with variable coefficients, Chaos Solitons & Fractals, **38**, 894 (2008).
Chandrasekar, V.K., Senthilvelan, M., Lakshmanan, M.: On the general solution for the modified Emden-type equation $\ddot{x}+\alpha x \dot{x}+\beta x^3=0$, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. **40**, 4717 (2007).
Chithiika Ruby, V., Senthilvelan, M., Lakshmanan, M.: Exact quantization of a [*PT*]{}-symmetric (reversible) Liénard type nonlinear oscillator, J. Phys. A : Math. Theor. **45**, 382002 (2012).
Chithiika Ruby, V., Chandrasekar, V.K., Senthilvelan, M., Lakshmanan, M.: Removal of ordering ambiguity for a class of position dependent mass quantum systems with an application to the quadratic Lienard type nonlinear oscillators, J. Math. Phys. **56**, 012103 (2015).
Choudhury, A.G., Guha, P.: Quantization of the Liénard II equation and Jacobi’s last multiplier, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. **46**, 165202 (2013).
Gubbiottia, G., Nucci, M.C.: Noether symmetries and the quantization of a Liénard-type nonlinear oscillator, J. Nonlinear. Math. Phys. **21**, 248-264, (2014).
Corichi, A., Ryan Jr, M.P.: Quantization of non-standard Hamiltonian systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. **30**, 3553 (1997).
Choudhury, A.G., Guha, P., Khanrad, B.: On the Jacobi last multiplier, integrating factors and the Lagrangian formulation of differential equations of the Painlevé-Gambier classification, J. Math. Anal. Appl. **360**, 651-664 (2009).
Jacobi, C.G.J.: Sul principio dell’ultimo moltiplicatore e suo uso come nuovo principio generale di meccanica, Giornale Arcadico di Scienze Lettere ed Arti, **99**, 129 (1844).
Jacobi, C.G.J.: Vorlesungen über Dynamik. Nebst fünf hinterlassenen Abhandlungen desselben herausgegeben von A Clebsch, Druck und Verlag von Georg Reimer, Berlin (1886).
Nucci, M.C., Leach, P.G.L.: Lagrangians galore, J. Math. Phys. **48**, 123510 (2007).
Nucci, M.C., Leach, P.G.L.: The Jacobi Last Multiplier and its applications in mechanics, Phys. Scr. **78**, 065011 (2008).
Nucci, M.C.: Jacobi last multiplier and Lie symmetries: a novel application of an old relationship, J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. **12**, 284 (2005).
Chandrasekar, V.K., Pandey, S.N., Senthilvelan, M., Lakshmanan, M.: A simple and unified approach to identify integrable nonlinear oscillators and systems, J. Math. Phys. **47**, 023508 (2006).
Mohanasubha, R., Chandrasekar, V.K., Senthilvelan, M., Lakshmanan, M.: Interplay of symmetries, null forms, Darboux polynomials, integrating factors and Jacobi multipliers in integrable second-order differential equations, Proc. R. Soc. A **470**, 20130656 (2014).
Chandrasekar, V.K., Senthilvelan, M., Lakshmanan, M.: On the complete integrability and linearization of certain second-order nonlinear ordinary differential equations, Proc. Roy. Soc. A **461**, 2451 (2005).
Chandrasekar, V.K., Senthilvelan, M., Lakshmanan, M.: On the complete integrability and linearization of nonlinear ordinary differential equations. II. Third-order equations, Proc. R. Soc. A **462**, 1831-1852 (2006).
Tiwari, A.K., Pandey, S.N., Senthilvelan, M., Lakshmanan, M.: On the complete Lie point symmetries classification of the mixed quadratic-linear Liénard type equation $\ddot{x}+f(x)\dot{x}^2+g(x)\dot{x}+h(x)=0$, Nonlinear Dyn. *DOI: 10.1007/s11071-015-2290-z*.
Gladwin Pradeep, R., Chandrasekar, V.K., Senthilvelan, M., Lakshmanan, M.: On certain new integrable second order nonlinear differential equations and their connection with two dimensional Lotka-Volterra system, J. Math. Phys. **51**, 033519 (2010).
Chandrasekar, V.K., Senthilvelan, M., Lakshmanan, M.: A unification in the theory of linearization of second order nonlinear ordinary differential equations, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. **39**, L69-L76 (2006).
Olver, P.J.: Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations, Springer-Verlag, New York (1986).
Mohanasubha, R., Sabiya Shakila, M.I., Senthilvelan, M.: On the linearization of isochronous centre of a modified Emden equation with linear external forcing, Comm Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. **19**, 799-806 (2014).
Musielak, Z.E.: General conditions for the existence of non-standard Lagrangians for dissipative dynamical systems, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. **42**, 2645-2652 (2009).
Cie$\acute{s}$linski, J.L., Nikiciuk, T.: A direct approach to the construction of standard and non-standard Lagrangians for dissipative-like dynamical systems with variable coefficients, J. Phys. A. **43**, 175205 (2010).
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We propose a theory to describe fermion mixing. The theory respects the maximal abelian family symmetries which are spontaneously broken down at a large scale. We find that quark mixing can be well described in this theory. Some concrete models are constructed. The crucial point for model building is to introduce some new particles which are SU(2) gauge singlets and carry -1/3 electric charge. The approximate family symmetries in our low energy effective theory are naturally achieved. Some interesting phenomena in the effective theory, especially with two Higgs-doublets, are discussed.'
---
=0.1in =-0.3in =0.7truecm =0.2truecm
=-0.4truecm =-0.4truecm
[**Spontaneous Family Symmetry Breaking And Fermion Mixing**]{}
[**Zhijian Tao**]{}
[*Theory Division, Institute of High Energy Physics, Academia Sinica\
Beijing 100039, China\
*]{}
In the standard model (SM) since all the Yukawa couplings are taken as free parameters, it lacks of an explanation on the pattern of the fermion masses and mixing, i.e. all the fermion masses and Kobayashi-Maskawa (KM) matrix are inputs of the model. This is usually thought as a shortcoming of the SM because of too many parameters. Moreover, though gauge interaction respects a flavor symmetry $G=U(3)_Q\times U(3)_U\times U(3)_D\times U(3)_L
\times U(3)_E$ acting on quarks and leptons, where Q and L are SU(2)-doublet quarks and leptons, U, D, E are singlet quarks and leptons respectively, the non-vanishing Yukawa couplings break this symmetry explicitly. Therefore it seems that in SM there exists a special flavor basis, we call it physical flavor basis. This basis is only corresponding to a set of particular form of Yukawa couplings, which would generate correct fermion masses and mixing. Then this arises a question of how to define a physical flavor basis of fermion in SM. We think there are generally two possible ways. One may postulate a particular form of Yukawa coupling, an example is democracy mechanism [@Fri], only the basis related to this particular form of Yukawa coupling is physical flavor basis, since in fact changing a basis through G transformation generally changes the form of Yukawa coupling too. Another way is to impose a certain family symmetry on fermions. A physical flavor basis can be singled out depending on the assignment of quantum number of the symmetry group. In this case the physical basis is specified first, while the pattern of fermion masses and mixing are determined only after the symmetry breaking.
The family symmetry group could be abelian or non-abelian. For three families SU(2) and SU(3) are the usual choices for non-abelian symmetry group [@Wil]. In this work we would like to look into the abelian case. We use F, S and T to denote the first, second and third family. Then the maximal abelian flavor symmetry group we consider is $U(1)_F\times U(1)_S\times U(1)_T$ acting on quarks and leptons [@Hall], we will call them $G_q$ and $G_l$ respectively. The Yukawa interaction respecting this symmetry can be written as $$L_Y=f_a{\bar Q_a}U_a\tilde{\Phi}+f_a'{\bar Q_a}D_a\Phi+g_a{\bar L_a}E_a\Phi
+h.c.$$ Here a is family index, $\Phi$ is standard Higgs-doublet. If the symmetry is not broken Yukawa couplings, therefore fermion masses, are all diagonal. So there is no mixing among different generations at this stage. Of course the reason for this is that different generations are assigned to different kind of conserved charges. To obtain non-trivial quark mixing, which is necessary to explain the observed KM matrix, the family symmetry must be spontaneously broken down at some scale $V$. The purpose of this work is to construct a theory, we will call it a underlying theory, which can realize the correct quark mixing after the flavor symmetry breaking.
We believe there are many possibilities to construct a underlying theory which can give rise to the correct results on fermion masses and mixing. But here we constrain ourself within the following conditions as our criteria to build our underlying theory. (i) we demand $V$ is larger than weak-scale $v$, namely SM could be viewed as a low energy effective theory of the underlying theory. And besides weak-scale $v$, $V$ is the only physical scale below grand unification (GUT) scale in the theory. (ii) There exists a hierarchy on tree level Yukawa couplings, $f_3>>f_2>>f_1$, similar relations are true for other terms. This requirement simply reflects the fact of fermion mass hierarchy. So the third family is defined as the heaviest one. (iii) Off-diagonal elements of the Yukawa interaction are induced only at loop level. This is probably true for quarks and charged leptons but not necessarily true for neutrinos in all the cases. As a result of this ansatz, one can easily have an order of magnitude explanation on the quark mixing as we will see below.
With these assumptions, even without a concrete model, one is able to obtain some qualitative features of the fermion mixing. After spontaneous family symmetry breaking, the Yukawa couplings are no longer diagonal. The non-diagonal couplings are induced due to symmetry breaking effects. In principle there are infinite number of operators induced in low energy effective interaction, but the dominant operators are those with the lowest dimension due to the fact that $V$ is larger than weak scale $v$. Those lowest dimension operators, which must be $SU(2)\times U(1)$ gauge invariant, can be written as $$L_Y^{eff}=L_Y+\xi_{ab}{\bar Q_a}U_b\tilde{\Phi}+\xi'_{ab}{\bar Q_a}D_b\Phi+
\eta_{ab}{\bar L_a}E_b\Phi+\eta'_{ab}L^T_aL_b\Phi^T\Phi+h.c.$$ Here a, b are family indices. $L_a^TL_b$ combines to SU(2)-singlet or triplet.
The off-diagonal elements of the couplings $\xi_{ab}$, $\xi'_{ab}$ and $\eta_{ab}$ are responsible for quark and charged lepton mixing. The fourth term is mostly responsible for generation of neutrino mass and mixing. From dimension analysis and the assumption (iii), we estimate that $\xi_{ab},~ \xi'_{ab} (a\not= b )\sim\displaystyle{\frac{f_3}{16\pi^2}}
\lambda_{ab}$. $\xi$ and $\xi'$ are dimensionless, and $1/16\pi^2$ is the loop factor. $f_3$ is the Yukawa coupling of the heaviest quark. For t quark as heavy as 170 GeV, $f_3$ should be order of one. Of course this is only a rough estimation. One order of magnitude larger or smaller should be reasonable. All uncertainties and other effects can be absorbed in $\lambda_{ab}$. As for the leptons there is a similar result, i.e. $\eta_{ab} (a\not=b)\sim
\displaystyle{\frac{g_3}{16\pi^2}}
\lambda_{ab}'$ but with $g_3\sim 10^{-2}$, for tau mass is around 1.7 GeV. However, one should also notice the difference between leptons and quarks at this point. For example in SM quark mixing is non-trivial, but the lepton mixing is trivial due to absence of right-handed neutrino. In a more complicated model, as we will see below, lepton mixing can occur generally. The fourth term is a dimension five operator and it breaks lepton number explicitly by two units. If lepton number is not broken then $\eta_{ab}'=0$, otherwise $\eta'_{ab}\sim\displaystyle{\frac{g_3}{16\pi^2V}}
\lambda_{ab}$. This should be a natural result since we expect a small neutrino mass for large $V$.
We denote the upper and down quarks, charged lepton and neutrino mass matrixes as $M^U$, $M^D$, $M^L$ and $M^{\nu}$ respectively. The diagonal elements of these matrixes are inputs in our theory. In practice we choose $M^U_{33}\sim 170$ GeV, ${M^U_{22}}\sim 1.5$ GeV$>>M^U_{11}$; $M^D_{33}\sim 5$ GeV, ${M^D_{22}}\sim 0.2$ GeV$>>M^D_{11}$ and $M^L_{33}\sim 1.7$ GeV, ${M^L_{22}}\sim 0.1$ GeV$>>M^L_{11}$; The mass matrixes are diagonalized by a set of bi-unitarity transformations on left, right-handed quarks and leptons. If U and V are the unitarity matrixes acting on $U_L$ and $D_L$, the KM matrix is defined as $K=U^+V$. With a not unreasonable choice of parameters: $\lambda_{32}/16\pi^2\sim 10^{-3}$ and $\lambda_{32}
\sim 6\lambda_{31}\sim 6\lambda_{21}$, the matrix elements of U and V are evaluated as $$\begin{array}{ll}
U_{32}\sim M^U_{32}/M^U_{33}\sim 6M^U_{31}/M^U_{33}\sim 6U_{31}\sim 10^{-3} &
U_{21}\sim M^U_{21}/M^U_{22}\sim 2\times 10^{-2}\\
{} & {}\\
V_{32}\sim M^D_{32}/M^D_{33}\sim 6M^D_{31}/M^D_{33}\sim 6V_{31}
\sim 3\times 10^{-2} &
V_{21}\sim M^D_{21}/M^D_{22}\sim 0.2
\end{array}$$ From this one can see that down quark mixing is larger than the mixing of up quark, and mixing between the third and the first two generations is smaller than mixing of the first two generations. This results in correct KM matrix elements at a factor of 2 or 3 level. And in this theory one can easily understand why $K_{32}$ is much smaller than $K_{21}$. In fact all the results are due to the fact that the third generation is much heavier than other two, up quarks are heavier than the corresponding down quarks and the non-diagonal elements of mass matrixes are only generated at one loop level. One interesting observation is that the loop effects which induce off-diagonal Yukawa interaction for quarks and charged leptons could be independent of the flavor symmetry breaking scale. Therefore one is free to push $V$ very high to satisfy other requirements. In contradiction with this is the neutrino mass, which is inversely proportional to the scale $V$, namely $m_{\nu}\sim 10^{-4}\lambda'v^2/V$ GeV. To get neutrino mass smaller than a few eV, V must be larger than $10^7- 10^8$ GeV, if $\lambda'$ is not very small, i.e. $\lambda'\sim 0.1-1$.
Spontaneous breaking of the global family symmetries will result in some Nambu-Goldston bosons. These bosons couple to quarks, leptons or both. There exists strong constrains on these couplings from cosmological and astrophysical considerations. Generally the constrains imply a lower limit on the scale of symmetry breaking $V$. In our theory since these couplings are induced only from loop diagrams. Hence the lower limit on $V$ is about two order of magnitudes smaller than in other cases. For quark- Goldston coupling the strongest constrains are from SN1987a [@Turner], which imply a lower bound $V>10^{8}$ GeV. For lepton-Goldston coupling the most stringent restriction is due to the cooling of red giants [@Morgan]. It requires that the scale $V$ must be larger than about $10^7$ GeV.
We now consider explicit models which yield this low-energy effective theory.
Model I: To extend SM we introduce a group of scalar particles $H_{ab}$ which are SU(2)-singlets and carry -1/3 electric charge. Under SU(3) color transformation, they behave like $\bf{3}$ or $\bf{\bar 6}$ plets. Scalars with these properties will couple to quarks as following: $$L_Y'=g_{ab}Q_a^TQ_bH_{ab}+g_{ab}'U^T_aD_bH_{ab}+h.c.$$ In order to break the family symmetry spontaneously, we introduce another set of color and electric neutral particles $S_a$ which transform as singlet of SU(2) gauge group. The most general Lagrangian of the model can be written as $$L=L_G+L_Y+L_Y'+V_P(S,H,\Phi)$$ where $L_G$ is gauge interaction. V is the most general potential of the scalar particles. Especially a term like $\lambda_{ac}H_{ab}^+H_{bc}S^*_aS_c$ is included in $V_P$. In this model because the particles H and S do not couple to leptons. We expect the lepton sector is same as that in SM. The family symmetry on lepton sector $G_l=U(1)_e\times U(1)_{\mu} \times U(1)_{\tau}$ is not broken. As a result, $\eta_{ab}=\eta'_{ab}=0$ (see equ. (2)). At scale $V$, when S fields get nonzero vacuum expectation values, the family symmetry $G_q$ (referring to quark fields only) is broken down to $U(1)_B$, where B is baryon number. The quark mixing among different generations are generated at one loop level as shown in Fig. 1. It is straightforward to obtain $$\begin{array}{l}
\xi_{ab}\simeq\displaystyle{\frac{1}{16\pi^2}g^*_{ac}\lambda_{ab}(f_c'g_{bc}'
+f_bg_{bc})\frac{<S^*_a><S_b>}{m_H^2}}\\
\xi_{ab}'\simeq\displaystyle{\frac{1}{16\pi^2}g^*_{ac}\lambda_{ab}(f_cg_{bc}'
+f_b'g_{bc})\frac{<S^*_a><S_b>}{m_H^2}}\\
\end{array}$$ Here $m_H$ is the mass of H particle and it is understood one should sum over index c. With $<S>\sim m_H\sim V$ and all the elements of g and g$'$ at same order, we get an approximate form for $\xi$ and $\xi'$ as $$\xi_{ab}\sim\xi_{ab}'\simeq\displaystyle{\frac{f_3}{16\pi^2}\lambda_{ab}}$$ which is the form we discussed in previous section. And obviously they are independent of the scale $V$.
Model II: We add another Higgs-doublet in model I. This is a two- Higgs-doublets model with abelian family symmetry $G_q$ spontaneously broken down to $U(1)_B$. $G_l$ is still unbroken in this model. So we will only consider quark sector. The low energy effective Yukawa interaction after family symmetry breaking has the form $$L_Y={\bar Q}(F_1\tilde{\Phi}_1+F_2\tilde{\Phi}_2)U+{\bar Q}(F_1'\Phi_1
+F_2'\Phi_2)D+h.c.$$ Still we impose the hierarchy condition ( i.e. condition (ii) ) on the diagonal elements of both $F_1(F_1')$ and $F_2(F_2')$ in order to obtain the pattern of quark masses naturally. The description of quark mixing is similar as in model one. Since typically the off-diagonal elements are about $0.2\sim 0.01$ of the related diagonal elements. We actually obtain a two-Higgs-doublets model at low energy with an approximate family symmetry $G_q$. One interesting consequence of the approximate symmetry is that one is able to avoid too large flavor changing neutral current (FCNC) naturally without resorting to Glashow and Weinberg’s discrete symmetry [@Glashow]. Spontaneous CP violation is also possible in this model [@Lee]. CP violation phenomena of this model was discussed recently by Wu and Wolfenstein [@Wu], where the approximate flavor symmetry is assumed from beginning. The main results of their research are the $\epsilon'$ value originated from scalar interaction is larger than in generic superweak model and in certain cases $\epsilon'/
\epsilon$ could be as large as $10^{-3}$. The electric dipole moments of electron [@Barr1] and neutron [@Weinberg] are close to current experimental bounds in this kind of models. Here we would like to point out a very interesting prediction of $D^0-{\bar D^0}$ mixing in our model. Since the mixing matrices for both down and up quarks are determined approximately, we can estimate the $D^0-{\bar D^0}$ mixing due to tree level FCNC. Our estimation gives $\Delta m_D\sim 10^{-14}-10^{-13}(100GeV/m_H)^2$ GeV, which is very close to present experimental bound [@Com], while the tree level FCNC contribution to $K^0-{\bar K^0}$ mixing is close but below the experimental value. This is probably the best place to discover this new physics in future experiments.
Model III: one group of SU(2)-singlet particles $h_{ab}$ are introduced based on model II. $h_{ab}$ carry one units of electric charge. These particles couple to lepton sector and the Higgs-doublets as following $$L_Y^{lepton}=C_{ab}L^T_aL_bh_{ab}+C'_{ab}\Phi_1^T\Phi_2h_{ab}S_{ab}$$ Just for the lepton sector this model is well-known as Zee-type model [@Zee]. The lepton sector family symmetries $G_l$ are spontaneously broken at scale $V$. $G_q$ and $G_l$ breaking are triggered by same S fields, therefore they should be spontaneously broken at same scale. And the lepton number violation in the model implies neutrino will get non-zero mass. This means nonzero $\xi$ and $\xi'$ values, $\xi\sim\xi'\sim\displaystyle{
\frac{g_3}{16\pi^2}\lambda}$. In addition, there exists non-trivial mixing of charged leptons. We checked all possible flavor changing processes in lepton sector and found that those flavor changing scalar interaction will not induce direct observable effects in the current and future experiments. Most phenomena of Zee-type model has been discussed extensively in literatures [@Smirnov]. Here we just point out that in our model leptons and quarks are actually treated in a similar way, i.e. we introduce H particles to couple quark sector and at the same time h particles to lepton sector.
In summary, we have examined the theory with $U(1)^3$ family symmetry which is spontaneously broken down at a large energy scale. We found that KM matrix can be well reproduced. And at the same time an approximate abelian family symmetry at low energy is automatically achieved. We constructed some explicit models by introduction of the particles $H_{ab}$ in quark sector. Analogy with this is the Zee-scalar particles $h_{ab}$ which was introduced in lepton sector to generate neutrino mass. The quark mixing could be independent of the family symmetry breaking scale and the mass of H particle. Constrains from cosmology and astrophysics, and small neutrino masses imply the flavor symmetry breaking scale should be larger than $10^7\sim 10^8$ GeV. In models with two-Higgs doublets ( model II and III ) $D^0-{\bar D}^0$ mixing is expected to be large and very close to current experimental bound [@Hall].
Finally some further developments which we believe could be interesting are in order. (1) In the framework of this theory, we don’t have any idea on the mass hierarchy of fermions. A larger unification symmetry of flavor is probably needed. For instance, it is already known that in some models with SU(3) flavor symmetry, one generation fermion could be “naturally” much heavier than another two [@Barr2]. One interesting possibility is to consider flavor symmetry breaking in two steps. At the first step SU(3) symmetry is broken down to $U(1)^3$. This possibility is now under investigation. (2) It is very desired to incorporate the models in GUT theory. h particles can occur through 10 plets of SU(5). H particles can be the number of, for example, 45 plets of Higgs fields in SU(5). Though as we said we can deal with quarks and leptons in the similar way as in model III, it is not in any sense an unification theory. A grand unification theory with certain flavor symmetry probably will offer us a deeper understanding of the pattern of fermion mass and mixing.
[1.]{}
H. Fritzsch and J. Plankl, Phys. Lett. [**B237**]{}, 451 (1990); Y. Nambu, in Proc. XI. Warsaw Symp. On High Energy Physics (Kazimierz, Poland, 1988); P. Kuas and S. Meshkov, Mod. Phys. Lett. [**A3**]{}, 1251 (1988). D. Chang, P. Pal and G. Senjanović, Phys. Lett. [**B153**]{}, 407 (1985); G. Gelmini, S. Nussinov and T. Yanagida, Nucl. Phys. [**B219**]{}, 31 (1983); F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**49**]{}, 1549 (1982); F. Wilczek and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**42**]{}, 421 (1979). This kind of approximate family symmetry has been discussed recently. See , L. Hall and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. [**D48**]{}, 979 (1993); A. Antaramian, L. Hall and A. Rasin, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**69**]{}, 1871 (1992). See for example, M. Turner, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**60**]{}, 1797 (1988). M. Morgan and G. Miller, Phys. Lett. [**179B**]{}, 379 (1986). S. Glashow and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. [**D15**]{}, 1958 (1977). T. D. Lee, Phys. Rev. [**D8**]{}, 1226 (1973); Phys. Rep. [**9C**]{}, 143 (1974). Y.-L. Wu and L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**73**]{}, 1762 (1994); ibid 2819 (1994); See also L. Hall and S. Weinberg in Ref. 3. S. M. Barr and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**65**]{}, 21 (1990). S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. [**D42**]{}, 860 (1990); D. W. Chang, W. Y. Keung and T. C. Yuan, Phys. Lett. [**B251**]{}, 608 (1990); J. Gunion and D. Wyler, Phys. Lett. [**B248**]{}, 170 (1990) Hall and Weinberg obtained a similar result on $\Delta m_D$, see the discussion on this issue in Ref. 3. A. Zee, Phys. Lett. [**B93**]{}, 387 (1980); [**B161**]{}, 141 (1985). See for example, A. Yu. Smirnov and Z. Tao, Nucl .Phys. [**B246**]{}, 415 (1994); R. Barbieri and L. Hall, Nucl. Phys. [**B364**]{}, 27 (1991); S. M. Barr, E. M. Freire and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**65**]{}, 2626 (1990); S. T. Petcov, Phys. Lett. [**B115**]{}, 401 (1982); L. Wolfenstein, Nucl. Phys. [**B175**]{}, 93 (1980). S. M. Barr, D. B. Reiss and A. Zee, Phys. Lett. [**B116**]{}, 227 (1982).
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: |
Finite-size particles modulate wall-bounded turbulence, leading for the case of spherical particles to increased drag also owing to the formation of a particle wall layer. Here, we study the effect of particle shape on the turbulence in suspensions of spheroidal particles at volume fraction $\phi = 10\%$ and show how the near-wall particle dynamics deeply changes with the particle aspect ratio and how this affects the global suspension behavior. Direct numerical simulations are performed using a direct-forcing immersed boundary method to account for the dispersed phase, combined with a soft-sphere collision model and lubrication corrections for short-range particle-particle and particle-wall interactions.\
The turbulence reduces with the aspect ratio of oblate particles, leading to drag reduction with respect to the single phase flow for particles with aspect ratio $\mathcal{AR}\leq1/3$,
author:
- 'M. Niazi Ardekani'
- 'L. Brandt'
bibliography:
- 'AR\_Paper.bib'
title: 'Turbulence modulation in channel flow of finite-size spheroidal particles'
---
Particulate turbulent flow, finite size particles, non-spherical particles
Introduction
============
The presence of solid rigid particles in a suspension alters the global transport and rheological properties of the mixture in complex, and often unpredictable, ways. These suspensions are relevant as found in many environmental and industrial processes such as sediment transport in estuaries [@Mehta2014], blood flow in the human body, pyroclastic flows and pulp fibers in paper making industry [@Lundell2011].
When the Reynolds number is sufficiently high, the flow becomes turbulent, with chaotic and multi-scale dynamics. In this regime, any solid object larger than the smallest scales of the flow can alter the turbulent structures at or below its size [@Naso2010], leading to turbulence modulation at large enough volume fractions [@Lucci2010; @Tanaka2015]. Particulate wall-bounded turbulent flows in the inertial regime have been investigated in recent years mainly for spherical particles [@Matas2003; @Loisel2013; @Yu2016; @Lashgari2014; @Wang2016]. [@Picano2015] investigated dense suspensions in turbulent channel flow up to volume fraction of $20\%$. Their study revealed that the overall drag increase is due to the enhancement of the turbulence activity up to a certain volume fraction and to the particle-induced stresses at higher concentrations. [@Costa2016] explained that the turbulent drag of sphere suspensions is always higher than what predicted by only accounting for the effective suspension viscosity. They attributed this increase to the formation of a particle wall layer, a layer of spheres forming near the wall in turbulent suspensions. Based on the thickness of the particle wall layer, they proposed a relation able to predict the friction Reynolds number as function of the bulk Reynolds number.
The dynamics of suspension in the presence of finite-size rigid non-spherical particles are less understood [@Prosperetti2015], with just a few studies in recent years [@Do2014; @Mehdi2017; @Eshghinejadfard2017]. In our previous study [@Mehdi2017], we performed simulations of turbulent channel flow with oblate spheroids of aspect ratio (polar over equatorial radius), $\mathcal{AR} = 1/3$, up to volume fraction $\phi = 15 \%$. We demonstrated that oblate particles induce an overall drag reduction as the volume fraction $\phi$ increases within the investigated range. Turbulence attenuation was also observed, as opposed to suspensions of spherical particles whose presence increases the turbulence activity for volume fractions below $\phi = 20 \%$. Two main mechanisms are found responsible for drag reduction: i) the absence of a particle wall layer, found to be responsible for the increased dissipation in suspensions of spheres; ii) the tendency of oblate particles to remain with their major axes parallel to the wall in its vicinity, thus shielding the near-wall region from the bulk flow.
Given the importance of particle dynamics on near-wall turbulence, we further investigate the shape effect by simulating spheroids of different aspect ratios $\mathcal{AR}$ at $\phi = 10 \%$, comparing prolates ($\mathcal{AR} > 1$), spheres ($\mathcal{AR} = 1$) and oblates ($\mathcal{AR} < 1$ ).
In this work we employ the numerical model in [@Ardekani2016; @Mehdi2017] to study dense suspensions of spheroidal particles. This approach is based on the immersed boundary method (IBM) initially proposed by [@Uhlmann2005; @Breugem2012] for spherical particles, extended to spheroids as described in [@Ardekani2016], including lubrication, friction and collision models for the short-range particle interactions. In this scheme, the flow field is resolved on a uniform ($ \Delta x = \Delta y = \Delta z$), staggered, Cartesian grid while particles are represented by a set of Lagrangian points, uniformly distributed on the surface of each particle.\
Flow geometry
-------------
We perform direct numerical simulations of pressure-driven, particulate turbulent channel flow in a computational domain of size $L_x=6h$, $L_y=2h$ and $L_z=3h$ in the streamwise, wall-normal and spanwise directions, where $h$ is half the channel height. The bulk velocity $U_b$ is fixed to guarantee a constant bulk Reynolds number $Re_b \equiv 2hU_b/\nu = 5600$, corresponding to friction Reynolds number of $Re_\tau \equiv u_{\tau}h/\nu \approx180$ for the single-phase flow with $\nu$, the kinematic viscosity of the fluid phase and $u_{\tau}$, the friction velocity. Different aspect ratios $\mathcal{AR} = 3$, $1$, $1/2$, $1/3$, $1/4$ and $1/5$ are simulated at volume fraction $\phi = 10\%$ and compared to the single-phase flow at same $Re_b$. We consider non-Brownian neutrally-buoyant rigid particles of different shape and same volume, with equivalent diameter $D_{eq}=h/9$, (i.e. the diameter of a sphere of same volume). This corresponds to $5000$ particles inside the computational domain at $\phi = 10\%$. The volume fraction is kept constant as it was shown before that excluded volume effects have the largest role on the turbulence modulation [@Fornari2016].
The simulations are performed with a resolution of $32$ grid points per $D_{eq}$ for the single-phase flow and the cases with $\mathcal{AR} = 1$, $1/2$ & $1/3$, whereas a resolution of $48$ points per $D_{eq}$ is found necessary to capture the thin boundary layer around the highly curved particles with $\mathcal{AR} = 3$, $1/4$ & $1/5$. The number of Lagrangian points $N_L$ on the surface of each particle is $N_L = 8122$, $3219$, $3406$, $3720$, $9120$ and $9880$ for the cases with $\mathcal{AR} = 3$, $1$, $1/2$, $1/3$, $1/4$ and $1/5$. . The simulations start from the laminar Poiseuille flow with random distribution of the particle position and orientation. The noise introduced by the presence of the particles triggers rapidly the transition to a fully turbulent state, after which the statistics are collected for about $16$ large-eddy turnover times $h/u_{\tau}$.
Results
=======
In this section we first investigate the effect of particles on the drag by computing the momentum budget, followed by the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) budget to explain how particles contribute to the production, transfer and dissipation of TKE, key for future modelling. Next, the turbulence modulation is documented by focusing on the fluid phase statistics and, finally, explained in relation to the particle dynamics.
Momentum and TKE budget analysis
--------------------------------
In particulate turbulent flows, the particle-induced stress also contributes to the mean momentum transfer in the wall-normal direction, in addition to the viscous and Reynolds shear stresses. Based on the formulation proposed by [@Zhang2010; @Picano2015], we can write the mean momentum balance in the channel as: $$\label{eq:Fl}
\rho_f u^2_{\tau} \left( 1 - \frac{y}{h} \right ) \, = \, \mu_f (1-\Phi) \frac{\mathrm{d} U_f}{\mathrm{d} y} \, - \, \rho_f \left[ \, \Phi \langle u^\prime_p v^\prime_p \rangle \, + \, (1-\Phi) \langle u^\prime_f v^\prime_f \rangle \right] \, + \, \Phi \langle \sigma^p_{xy} \rangle \, \, \, ,$$ where the first term on the right hand side is the viscous shear stress, denoted $\tau_V$, the second and the third terms are the turbulent Reynolds shear stress of the combined phase, $\tau_T$, sum of the separate contributions from the two phases, and the fourth term the particle-induced stress $\tau_P$. An overall drag reduction is observed for the cases with $\mathcal{AR} \leq 1/3$, increasing up to $10\%$ for the smallest $\mathcal{AR}=1/5$. The largest increase with respect to the unladen case is obtained for spheres, whereas a small drag increase is still observed for $\mathcal{AR}=1/2$. Finally, the drag for the case with prolate particles is almost the same as for the single-phase flow. Considering the different contributions, we note the non-monotonic behaviour of the particle-induced stress with decreasing $\mathcal{AR}$ as it reaches a minimum for $\mathcal{AR}=1/3$ before slightly increasing when further decreasing the aspect ratio. In addition, we see turbulence attenuation for all non-spherical cases, an effect increasing as the aspect ratio departs from sphericity.
![$(a)$: The contribution of the viscous, $\tau_V$, Reynolds, $\tau_T$, and particle-induced stress, $\tau_P$, for different aspect ratios, normalized by the drag of the single-phase flow. $(b)$: Turbulence Reynolds number $Re_T$ and friction Reynolds number $Re_{\tau}$, normalized by the values for the single-phase flow case. $(c)$: Production, dissipation and interphase injection of TKE, normalized with ${(u^0_{\tau})}^4/\nu$ of the single phase flow. The production is not depicted in the vicinity of the wall for clarity.[]{data-label="fig:budget"}](BudgetStress.pdf "fig:"){width="49.50000%"} ![$(a)$: The contribution of the viscous, $\tau_V$, Reynolds, $\tau_T$, and particle-induced stress, $\tau_P$, for different aspect ratios, normalized by the drag of the single-phase flow. $(b)$: Turbulence Reynolds number $Re_T$ and friction Reynolds number $Re_{\tau}$, normalized by the values for the single-phase flow case. $(c)$: Production, dissipation and interphase injection of TKE, normalized with ${(u^0_{\tau})}^4/\nu$ of the single phase flow. The production is not depicted in the vicinity of the wall for clarity.[]{data-label="fig:budget"}](Energy.pdf "fig:"){width="49.50000%"} (-393,209) (-393,38) (-291,150)[[$\mathcal{AR}$]{}]{} (-253,161)[[Single]{}]{} (-252,154)[[phase]{}]{} (-291,-5)[[$\mathcal{AR}$]{}]{} (-97,-5)[[$y / h$]{}]{} (-155,270)[[$\mathcal{P}$]{}]{} (-150,80)[[$-\mathcal{\epsilon}$]{}]{} (-161,173)[[$\mathcal{I}$]{}]{} (-392,299)[$(a)$]{} (-392,139)[$(b)$]{} (-195,299)[$(c)$]{}
$Re_T$, normalized by that of the single-phase flow, $Re^0_T \approx 174$, is depicted in figure \[fig:budget\]$(b)$ for different $\mathcal{AR}$, together with the ratio $Re_{\tau}/Re^0_{\tau} =Re_{\tau}/180$. The results indicate that the turbulence activity is decreasing faster than the friction Reynolds number when decreasing the aspect ratio of oblate particles.
We next consider the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) budget to quantify the solid-phase contribution to production and dissipation of TKE of the fluid phase. Considering the Navier-Stokes (NS) equations with the IBM force ($f$), employed to impose no-slip at the particle surface, the TKE budget can be written for a fully developed turbulent channel flow as:
The data indicate a strong reduction of $\mathcal{P}$ in the near-wall region with decreasing $\mathcal{AR}$ for oblate particles. A significant reduction is also observed for prolate particles, while a slight increase with respect to the single-phase flow is seen for spheres. The dissipation term $\mathcal{\epsilon}$ is almost the same as in the single-phase flow for non-spherical particles, except at the wall where its value reduces with $\mathcal{AR}$. For spherical particles, however, the dissipation is considerably larger throughout the channel. The energy injected by the fluid-solid interactions, i.e. the interphase energy injection at the particle surface, interestingly follows the same trend as the contribution of particle-induced stresses in the momentum balance ($\tau_P $ in figure \[fig:budget\]$a$): it reaches a minimum at $\mathcal{AR}=1/3$, before increasing again for lower aspect ratios. The energy injected by the particles first decreases when decreasing $\mathcal{AR}$, owing to the reduced rotation rate discussed below; however, it increases again for the smallest aspect ratio considered ($\mathcal{AR}=1/5$) as the particle surface area increases.
Turbulence modulation
---------------------
![$(a)$: Fluid velocity fluctuations $u^{\prime}$, $v^{\prime}$ and $w^{\prime}$ in the streamwise, — , wall-normal, - - - , and spanwise, ... , directions and $(b)$: Reynolds shear stress, scaled in outer units for different aspect ratios. The velocity fluctuations for the cases with $\mathcal{AR}=1/2$ and $1/4$ are not shown in panel $(a)$ to improve clarity.[]{data-label="fig:RMS"}](UVWrms.pdf "fig:"){width="49.50000%"} ![$(a)$: Fluid velocity fluctuations $u^{\prime}$, $v^{\prime}$ and $w^{\prime}$ in the streamwise, — , wall-normal, - - - , and spanwise, ... , directions and $(b)$: Reynolds shear stress, scaled in outer units for different aspect ratios. The velocity fluctuations for the cases with $\mathcal{AR}=1/2$ and $1/4$ are not shown in panel $(a)$ to improve clarity.[]{data-label="fig:RMS"}](RSS.pdf "fig:"){width="49.50000%"} (-385,53) (-185,62) (-99,0)[[$y / h$]{}]{} (-292,0)[[$y / h$]{}]{} (-385,130)[$(a)$]{} (-185,130)[$(b)$]{}\
Fluid velocity fluctuations of the fluid phase are depicted in figure \[fig:RMS\]$(a)$ for the different particle aspect ratios under investigations. The velocity fluctuations are reduced compared to the single-phase flow for non-spherical particles in the crossflow directions. The effect is observed to increase as the aspect ratio of oblate particles decreases. Spherical particles, on the other hand, increase the crossflow velocity fluctuations. The strongest reduction of $u^{\prime}$ is observed for prolates, followed by spheres despite the slight increase in the core region. Interestingly, $u^{\prime}$ is observed to increase with reducing $\mathcal{AR}$ in the oblate cases. The same behaviour is observed in the literature for other drag reducing flows, e.g. polymeric flows, when reduced spanwise and wall-normal velocity fluctuations are observed [@Dubief2004]. Figure \[fig:RMS\]$(b)$ shows the Reynolds shear stress of the fluid phase for all studied cases. A significant turbulence attenuation is observed for non-spherical particles, as opposed to the turbulence enhancement for spherical particles. The Reynolds shear stress $-u^\prime_f \,v^\prime_f$ decreases monotonically with decreasing $\mathcal{AR}$ in the oblate cases. Interestingly, the $-u^\prime_f \,v^\prime_f$ pertaining prolates with $\mathcal{AR}=3$ is approximately matching the case of oblates with $\mathcal{AR}=1/3$.
![$(a)$: Reynolds shear stress, conditionally averaged outside of the particles, for each quadrant of $u^\prime_f \,v^\prime_f$ plane for different aspect ratios. []{data-label="fig:Quad"}](Quad_sub.pdf "fig:"){width="100.00000%"} (-215,103)[$Q_2$]{} (-215,80)[$Q_4$]{} (-215,48)[$Q_1$]{} (-215,16)[$Q_3$]{} (-293,-10)[[$y / h$]{}]{} (-102,-10)[[$y / h$]{}]{} (-102,86)[[$y / h$]{}]{} (-55,150)[$Q_2$]{} (-55,30)[$Q_4$]{} (-393,80)[ ]{} (-390,185)[$(a)$]{} (-200,185)[$(b)$]{} (-200,92)[$(c)$]{}
The Reynolds shear stresses are then conditionally averaged over each quadrant of the $u^{\prime}-v^{\prime}$ plane, with $Q_1$ to $Q_4$ referring to the four quadrants. $Q_2$ (ejections: $u^\prime_f<0$, $v^\prime_f>0$) and $Q_4$ (sweeps: $u^\prime_f>0$, $v^\prime_f<0$) events result in turbulence production, while $Q_1$ and $Q_3$ are responsible for damping. The results of this analysis are depicted in figure \[fig:Quad\]$(a)$, where it is observed that the presence of oblate particles reduces the value of $u^{\prime}v^{\prime}$ over all four quadrants, with a far more pronounced dampening of the ejection events. Spherical particles, on the other hand, increase the strength of sweeps close to the wall and reduce the contribution of $Q_3$ events, without altering the others noticeably. Prolate particles exhibit an effect similar to oblates, but with lower dampening of the ejections.
![Contours of two-point spatial correlation of the streamwise velocity fluctuations as a function of the spanwise spacing for different wall-normal distances: $(a)$ single-phase flow, $(b)$ $\mathcal{AR}=1$, $(c)$ $\mathcal{AR}=1/5$ and $(d)$ $\mathcal{AR}=3$. The inner length scale $\nu/u_{\tau}$, used here, is calculated from the single-phase flow case to allow for a direct comparison. The solid and dashed lines correspond to positive and negative values, ranging from $0.8$ to $-0.2$ with a step of $0.2$.[]{data-label="fig:Corr"}](Corr.png "fig:"){width="100.00000%"} (-386,238)[$(a)$]{} (-208,238)[$(b)$]{} (-386,111)[$(c)$]{} (-208,111)[$(d)$]{} (-390,185)[ ]{} (-390,60)[ ]{} (-297,-5)[ $z^+$]{} (-120,-5)[ $z^+$]{}
Particle dynamics
-----------------
![Profiles of solid-phase averaged data versus $y/h$; $(a)$: mean local volume fraction $\Phi$; $(b)$: cosine of the mean particle inclination angle $\theta$, measured with respect to the wall; $(c)$: magnitude of angular velocity vector $\pmb{\Omega}_p$; $(d)$: particle velocity fluctuations $\textbf{u}_p^{\prime}$; []{data-label="fig:Particles"}](phi.pdf "fig:"){width="49.50000%"} ![Profiles of solid-phase averaged data versus $y/h$; $(a)$: mean local volume fraction $\Phi$; $(b)$: cosine of the mean particle inclination angle $\theta$, measured with respect to the wall; $(c)$: magnitude of angular velocity vector $\pmb{\Omega}_p$; $(d)$: particle velocity fluctuations $\textbf{u}_p^{\prime}$; []{data-label="fig:Particles"}](Align.pdf "fig:"){width="49.50000%"} (-382,67) (-193,67) (-100,0)[[$y / h$]{}]{} (-292,0)[[$y / h$]{}]{} (-96,30)[[$x$]{}]{} (-122,51)[[$y$]{}]{} (-112,43)[[$\theta$]{}]{} (-97,100)[[$x$]{}]{} (-123,125)[[$y$]{}]{} (-116,122)[[$\theta$]{}]{} (-387,130)[$(a)$]{} (-194,130)[$(b)$]{}\
![Profiles of solid-phase averaged data versus $y/h$; $(a)$: mean local volume fraction $\Phi$; $(b)$: cosine of the mean particle inclination angle $\theta$, measured with respect to the wall; $(c)$: magnitude of angular velocity vector $\pmb{\Omega}_p$; $(d)$: particle velocity fluctuations $\textbf{u}_p^{\prime}$; []{data-label="fig:Particles"}](Part_omega.pdf "fig:"){width="49.50000%"} ![Profiles of solid-phase averaged data versus $y/h$; $(a)$: mean local volume fraction $\Phi$; $(b)$: cosine of the mean particle inclination angle $\theta$, measured with respect to the wall; $(c)$: magnitude of angular velocity vector $\pmb{\Omega}_p$; $(d)$: particle velocity fluctuations $\textbf{u}_p^{\prime}$; []{data-label="fig:Particles"}](Part_fluct.pdf "fig:"){width="49.50000%"} (-382,66) (-193,67) (-100,0)[[$y / h$]{}]{} (-292,0)[[$y / h$]{}]{} (-387,130)[$(c)$]{} (-194,130)[$(d)$]{}\
![Profiles of solid-phase averaged data versus $y/h$; $(a)$: mean local volume fraction $\Phi$; $(b)$: cosine of the mean particle inclination angle $\theta$, measured with respect to the wall; $(c)$: magnitude of angular velocity vector $\pmb{\Omega}_p$; $(d)$: particle velocity fluctuations $\textbf{u}_p^{\prime}$; []{data-label="fig:Particles"}](OMX.pdf "fig:"){width="49.50000%"} ![Profiles of solid-phase averaged data versus $y/h$; $(a)$: mean local volume fraction $\Phi$; $(b)$: cosine of the mean particle inclination angle $\theta$, measured with respect to the wall; $(c)$: magnitude of angular velocity vector $\pmb{\Omega}_p$; $(d)$: particle velocity fluctuations $\textbf{u}_p^{\prime}$; []{data-label="fig:Particles"}](OMY.pdf "fig:"){width="49.50000%"} (-382,66) (-193,67) (-100,0)[[$y / h$]{}]{} (-292,0)[[$y / h$]{}]{} (-387,130)[$(e)$]{} (-194,130)[$(f)$]{}\
Preferential sampling, particle rotation and orientation, especially close to the wall, can lead to a strong modulation of the turbulence. Here we discuss the link between the solid-phase averaged data and the drag modifications and turbulence activity reported in the previous sections.
The mean local volume fraction, $\Phi$, is depicted versus the wall-normal distance $y/h$ in figure \[fig:Particles\]$(a)$. Interestingly, a peak close to the wall is only observed for the spherical particles. This peak corresponds to a layer of particles that form due to the wall-particle interactions [@Picano2015] and is partially responsible for the increase of drag in this case [@Costa2016]. . To better understand this, we report in figure \[fig:Particles\]$(b)$ the average particle orientation throughout the channel. The orientation is measured as the cosine of the inclination angle $\theta$, which is the smallest angle between the spheroid axis of symmetry and the normal to the wall. The data clearly show the strong tendency for oblate and prolate particles to have their largest semi-axis parallel to the wall. . An arbitrary symmetry axis is chosen for spheres to demonstrate the sphere random orientation. The magnitude of the angular velocity vector $\pmb{\Omega}_p$, , is depicted for the different aspect ratios in figure \[fig:Particles\]$(c)$: the angular velocities drastically decrease for oblate particles. Prolate particles, similarly to spheres, display a non-negligible angular velocity; Conversely, in the case of spherical particles, the major contribution to the angular velocity is due to the mean spanwise component $\Omega^z_p$, as a direct consequence of the mean shear. Larger angular velocities result in a larger particle-induced stress as the rotation of particles larger than the smallest scale of the flow opposes stretch and deformation. To better distinguish the effect of mean flow and fluctuations on the dynamics of particles, we have simulated the behavior of single particles kept at a fixed distance from the wall ($y/h=0.1$) in the laminar flow defined by the turbulent profile. These additional runs (not shown in the figure) show that a sphere tends to a constant angular velocity in the spanwise direction, oblate particle with $\mathcal{AR}=1/2$ exhibits a periodic spanwise angular velocity, with the majority of time spent parallel to the wall, and, more interestingly, the motion of particles with $\mathcal{AR}=1/3$, $1/4$, $1/5$ and $3$ converges to zero angular velocity with the broad side approximately parallel to the wall (slightly tilted). The tendency of non-spherical particles to remain parallel to the wall is therefore a mean flow effect and quenches effectively the velocity fluctuations, resulting in turbulence attenuation. This mechanism is more effective when the particles are larger than the turbulence structures. The role of the particle size can be deduced from the results in figure \[fig:Particles\]: local volume fraction, particle rotation and orientation attain similar values for oblates with $\mathcal{AR}\leq1/3$, however the turbulence attenuation increases for broader oblates. This can also be concluded from figure \[fig:Particles\]$(d)$, where the magnitude of the particle velocity fluctuations, is shown to decrease with $\mathcal{AR}$.
![$(a)$ Probability density function (PDF) of streamwise fluid velocity fluctuation, surrounding particles close to the wall and $(b)$: the difference between the particle and the fluid mean velocity, .[]{data-label="fig:pdf"}](pdf2.pdf "fig:"){width="49.50000%"} ![$(a)$ Probability density function (PDF) of streamwise fluid velocity fluctuation, surrounding particles close to the wall and $(b)$: the difference between the particle and the fluid mean velocity, .[]{data-label="fig:pdf"}](Slip_Vel.pdf "fig:"){width="49.50000%"} (-377,60) (-190,58) (-99,-1)[[$y / h$]{}]{} (-296,-1)[[$u^{\prime} / U_b$]{}]{} (-385,120)[$(a)$]{} (-190,120)[$(b)$]{}
Finally, we examine the probability density function (PDF) of the streamwise fluid velocity fluctuations in the vicinity of the particles and in a region close to the wall , see figure \[fig:pdf\]$(a)$. The fluid velocity fluctuations relative to each particle are the average on the spheroidal shell $5\%$ larger than the particle itself. The data indicate a clear tendency for particles to sample high-speed regions close to the wall. This observed preferential sampling is weakest for spheres, followed by prolates and more and more evident when decreasing the aspect ratio of oblate particles. Figure \[fig:pdf\]$(b)$ shows the difference in the mean particle $U_p$ and fluid $U_f$ velocity: the difference in the region $y/h<0.2$ is consistent with the PDF reported in figure \[fig:pdf\]$(a)$.
Final remarks
=============
We have reported results from the simulations of turbulent channel flow of suspensions of finite-size spheroidal particles with different aspect ratios $\mathcal{AR} = 3$, $1$, $1/2$, $1/3$, $1/4$ and $1/5$ at volume fraction $\phi = 10\%$. By computing the contribution of the viscous, Reynolds and particle-induced shear stresses to the momentum transfer we show turbulence attenuation (with respect to the single-phase flow) for all the studied cases, except for spheres where an increase in the turbulence activity is observed. The turbulent Reynolds stresses reduce with the aspect ratio of oblate particles, i.e. for flatter disc-like particles. Overall drag reduction with respect to the single phase flow is observed for the oblate particles with $\mathcal{AR}\leq1/3$, once the turbulence attenuation is large enough to compensate the particle-induced stresses; in the cases with $\mathcal{AR} = 1/2$ and $3$, on the contrary, the reduction in the turbulence activity (Reynolds shear stress) is lower than the additional stress induced by the particles. In particular, the drag is shown to increase significantly for spherical particles and slightly for oblates with $\mathcal{AR} = 1/2$, while no relevant drag modification is reported for the case of prolate particles. Different mechanisms are found in this study to explain how the dynamics of spherical, oblate and prolate particles modulate the turbulence close to the wall.
Spheres form a layer close to the wall, rotating with high spanwise angular velocity. Their rotation brings high momentum flow towards the wall, increasing the strength of sweep events (figure \[fig:Quad\]$a$) and therefore increasing the turbulence activity. The presence of a particle-layer close to the wall also results in noisier low and high-speed streaks (figure \[fig:Corr\]$b$).
Prolate particles are oriented with their major axis parallel to the wall, experiencing a significant wall-normal angular velocity due to the velocity fluctuations. Their rotation creates momentum mixing in the streamwise-spanwise plane, which results in the disruption of the near-wall low-speed streaks, see figure \[fig:Corr\]$d$. In this way, prolate particles reduce the peak of streamwise and spanwise velocity fluctuations and reduce the wall-normal fluctuations as they resist rotations in the spanwise direction.
Oblate particles tend to be parallel to the wall, while also avoiding its vicinity and experiencing significantly smaller angular velocities with respect to the other shapes considered. They sample high-speed regions close to the wall, increasing the spacing between the low-speed streaks (figure \[fig:Corr\]$c$). These particles create a strong shield that decreases the turbulent activity by resisting rotation and therefore dampen the velocity fluctuations. Preferential sampling, rotation and orientation of oblate particles converge to similar values for oblates with $\mathcal{AR}\leq1/3$, however the turbulence attenuation continues to increase due to their larger major-axis.
Acknowledgements {#acknowledgements .unnumbered}
================
This work was supported by the European Research Council Grant No. ERC-2013-CoG-616186, TRITOS. The authors acknowledge computer time provided by SNIC (Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing) and the support from the COST Action MP1305: Flowing matter.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We study the dynamics of a beam of fermions diffracted off a density grating formed by fermionic atoms in the limit of a large grating. An exact description of the system in terms of particle-hole operators is developed. We use a combination of analytical and numerical methods to quantitatively explore the Raman-Nath and the Bragg regimes of diffraction. We discuss the limits in diffraction efficiency resulting from the dephasing of the grating due to the distribution of energy states occupied by the fermions. We propose several methods to overcome these limits, including the novel technique of “atom echoes”.'
author:
- 'H. Christ, C. P. Search, and P. Meystre'
title: 'Dynamics of Fermionic Four-Wave Mixing'
---
Introduction
============
The availability of quantum-degenerate bosonic atomic systems has recently allowed the extension of atom optics to the nonlinear [@Lenz93] and the quantum regimes. Matter-wave four-wave mixing [@Deng99], coherent matter-wave amplification [@amplification] and superradiance [@Inou99a], the generation of dark [@Burg99] and bright [@Stre02] atomic solitons and of correlated atomic pairs [@Voge02] have been demonstrated, and so has the matter-wave analog of second-harmonic generation, the creation of a molecular condensate component [@Wyna00; @Mcke02].
In contrast, the development of the nonlinear atom optics of fermionic atomic systems is not nearly as far along. While it has been shown theoretically [@Kett01; @Moor01] that the four-wave mixing of fermionic matter waves is possible in principle, these predictions have not been verified experimentally so far. Still, the recent achievement of temperatures as low as $0.2T_F$, where $T_F$ is the Fermi temperature, for the fermions $\mbox{ }^{40}$K and $\mbox{ }^{6}$Li [@Lithium1; @Dema99; @Hadz02; @Roat02] is encouraging, and it is hoped that first experiments on fermionic nonlinear atom optics will take place in the near future. In addition to the fundamental goal of achieving a BCS phase transition into pairing and superfluidity [@Thomas02], research along these lines is also motivated by recent results that hint at the possibility to lower the phase noise in interferometric measurements below the bosonic standard quantum limit by using instead degenerate fermionic beams [@Sear02c].
The first theoretical discussions of fermionic nonlinear atom optics were presented in Refs. [@Kett01] and [@Moor01], which treated the case of a single ‘test’ particle scattering off a periodic density grating formed by a degenerate Fermi gas. They showed that for an appropriately prepared grating, the fermionic system can indeed undergo four-wave mixing. In contrast to the standard interpretation in terms of “bosonic amplification”, which clearly is not applicable to fermions, this effect was interpreted in terms of the constructive quantum interference between different paths leading to the same final state.
One important aspect of the fermionic case is that, in contrast to bosons, considerable care must be taken in combining two matter waves to form a “grating”, so that their interaction with a third wave can produce a significant four-wave mixing signal. Consider, as we shall do in this paper, counterpropagating matter waves separated in momentum by $q$. In the case of bosons, two obvious possibilities correspond to the states $$|\psi_{b,1}\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2 (N/2)!}}\left [
(b^\dagger_{q/2})^{N/2}+(b^\dagger_{-q/2})^{N/2} \right ]
|0\rangle,$$ and $$|\psi_{b,2}\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2^N N!}} \left
[b^\dagger_{q/2}+b^\dagger_{-q/2} \right ]^N|0\rangle ,$$ the $b^\dagger_k$ being usual bosonic creation operators and $|0\rangle$ the atomic vacuum. The fist case describes two counterpropagating beams of $N/2$ atoms each and of momenta $\pm
q/2$, while the second state corresponds to a density grating obtained by identically preparing $N$ atoms in a coherent superposition of states of momenta $\pm q/2$. It is known from the study of atomic diffraction by optical fields that these two states lead to different diffraction patterns, because the first one contains “which way” information while the second doesn’t [@Shore91]. This difference becomes however insignificant for large gratings.
The situation for fermions is more complicated, since the Pauli exclusion principle precludes one from placing more than one atom per state. One needs instead to consider multimode atomic beams, centered around the mean momenta $\pm q/2$. In this case the states $|\psi_{b,1}\rangle$ and $|\psi_{b,2}\rangle$ are replaced by $$|\psi_{f,1}\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left [\prod_{\{k\}}^{N/2}
a_{k+q/2}^\dagger + \prod_{\{k\}}^{N/2} a_{k-q/2}^\dagger \right
]|0\rangle$$ and $$|\psi_{f,2}\rangle=\prod_{\{k\}}^N \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left
[a_{k+q/2}^\dagger + a_{k-q/2}^\dagger \right ]|0\rangle ,
\label{fermi-grating}$$ where $a_{k\pm q/2}^\dagger$ are fermionic creation operators for atoms of momenta in the vicinity of $\pm q/2$, the total number of atoms involved being indicated in the appropriate products. From Refs. [@Kett01; @Moor01; @Yamamoto], we know that it is the quantum coherence apparent in matter-wave states of the form $|\psi_{f,2}\rangle$ that is responsible for fermionic four-wave mixing. In order for the required quantum interference to occur, it is essential that every atom be in a coherent superposition of momentum states centered around $q/2$ and $-q/2$.
![Spin-down polarized fermionic beam diffracted by a second species of spin-up polarized fermions forming a matter-wave grating.[]{data-label="model"}](fig1.eps){width="8cm" height="5cm"}
So far, our discussion has ignored the time dependence of the grating. But since the atoms forming a fermionic grating all have slightly different kinetic energies, their free evolution results in a dephasing that is expected to eventually lead to the disappearance of the four-wave mixing signal. Although the importance of this dephasing was pointed out in Ref. [@Kett01], no quantitative discussion of its effect has been presented so far. The present paper addresses this problem quantitatively by a combined analytical and numerical study of the diffraction of a beam of fermionic atoms off a large fermionic grating. We fully include the dynamics of the atomic beam, but neglect its back-action on the grating dynamics, considering only its free evolution. This is the matter-wave analog of the undepleted pump approximation in nonlinear optics.
Section II introduces our model and describes its dynamics in terms of equations of motion for particle-hole operators. The effect of the grating dynamics is characterized in terms of a dephasing time $\tau_d$, whose impact is then illustrated in the simple case of Raman-Nath diffraction. The Bragg regime is analyzed in section III using a combination of an analytical discussion of a simple two-mode system and full numerical simulations. We determine the characteristic time scales governing this process, and conclude that four-wave mixing in degenerate Fermi gases should barely be observable. Noting that the dephasing of the grating is in principle reversible, we turn in Section IV to a discussion of possible ways to achieve such a reversal, based on analogies with the photon echo techniques of quantum optics. Since the physical origin of the dephasing is the difference in kinetic energies for atoms with different momenta, one elegant approach exploits the interaction of the grating with a periodic external potential to achieve a negative effective mass of the atoms. Such methods pave the way for the observation of phenomena that seem out of experimental reach at first glance. Finally, Section V is a summary and outlook.
Model
=====
A typical atomic four-wave mixing experiment involves three input wave packets that interact, typically via $s$-wave collisions, to produce a fourth packet in a new momentum state. Physically, this can be interpreted as the result of the phase-matched scattering of one of the wave packets off the matter-wave grating produced by the superposition of the other two, as discussed in the introduction.
As is readily apparent from Eq. (\[fermi-grating\]), though, a grating formed by $N$ fermions occupies $2N$ momentum states, with $N$ states around the momentum $q/2$ and $N$ states near $-q/2$ in our case. As a result of the free evolution associated with the spread in kinetic energies of these atoms, the density grating undergoes a dephasing, similar to Doppler broadening in a thermal vapor. The goal of this paper is to investigate the effects of this dephasing and to determine to what extent it can be reduced, or even eliminated.
We consider the situation of a spin-polarized fermionic beam diffracted by an atomic grating of spin-polarized fermions that are either of a different species or in a different spin state, see Fig. \[model\], the beam and grating atoms interacting coherently via elastic $s$-wave scattering. We neglect $p$-wave scattering, whose cross-section at zero temperature is orders of magnitude smaller than that of *s*-wave scattering.
The diffraction of a fermionic atomic beam by a periodic potential was previously treated for the case of free fermions (or equivalently a one-dimensional bosonic Tonks gas) [@Rojo99] and of Cooper pairs [@Sear02a]. These treatments are restricted to the Raman-Nath regime, where the kinetic energies of the diffracted atoms are negligible compared to the potential energy of the grating. The scattering of two fermions by an optical standing wave was also considered in Ref. [@Lenz93b]. Also worth mentioning in the present context is Ref. [@Vill01], which investigates the nonlinear mixing of two bosonic and one fermionic wave. In these cases Pauli blocking has a significant effect on the diffraction pattern, but as the gratings are non-fermionic, the dephasing, which is central to our work, is not addressed.
We restrict the quantized description of the system to the dimension along the axis of the grating only, the “transverse” direction. The dynamics of the system in the direction perpendicular to it is treated classically, and parameterized by the time the atoms in the beam interact with the grating. Note that this approximation neglects both the normal reflection and the Bragg reflection of the incident beam off the grating [@Vill01].
This model is described by the second-quantized Hamiltonian $$\begin{aligned}
\label{BasicHamiltonian}
H&=&\sum_k \left (\hbar \omega_k^{(g)} {a}^{\dag}_{k \uparrow}a_{k
\uparrow} + \hbar \omega_k^{(b)}{a}^{\dag}_{k \downarrow}a_{k
\downarrow} \right) \nonumber\\
&+& \hbar U_0
\sum_{k_1,k_2,q}\left(
a^{\dag}_{k_1+q \uparrow}a^{\dag}_{k_2-q \downarrow} a_{k_2
\downarrow}a_{k_1 \uparrow} \right),\end{aligned}$$ where $\omega_k^{(g)}=\hbar k^2/2m_g$ ($\omega_k^{(b)}=\hbar
k^2/2m_b$) is the kinetic energy of a grating (beam) atom of mass $m_g$ ($m_b$) and transverse momentum $k$, $$U_0= 2\pi \hbar a/(LA\mu), \label{U0}$$ $\mu = m_gm_b/(m_g + m_b)$ is the reduced mass, $a$ is the $s$-wave scattering length characterizing the ultracold collisions between grating and beam atoms, $A$ is an effective transverse cross-sectional area, and $L$ is the quantization length. The annihilation and creation operators $a_{k,s}$ and $a^\dagger_{k,s}$ satisfy the fermionic anticommutation relations $\left[ a_{ks}, a_{k's'} \right]_+=0$ and $\left[ a_{ks},
a^{\dag}_{k's'} \right]_+=\delta_{kk'}\delta_{ss'}$, the spin components $s=\{\uparrow, \downarrow \}$ corresponding to the different spin states or atomic species of the grating and the beam, respectively.
Since the elementary process underlying matter-wave diffraction consists in annihilating an atom of momentum $k$ and creating an atom with momentum $k + q$, it is useful to describe the dynamics of the atomic beam in terms of “particle-hole” operators $$\begin{aligned}
\label{particleholeoperators}
\rho_{k,q}^{(b)}&=&a^{\dag}_{k+q \downarrow}a_{k \downarrow},
\nonumber\\
\rho_{k,q'}^{(g)}&=&a^{\dag}_{k+q \uparrow}a_{k \uparrow},\end{aligned}$$ where the subscripts “b” and “g” label beam and grating atoms, respectively. The Heisenberg equations of motion for these operators are easily found as $$\begin{aligned}
\label{particleholefullequations}
&&i \frac{d}{dt}\rho_{k,q'}^{(b)}=
\omega_{k,q'}^{(b)}\rho_{k,q'}^{(b)}\nonumber\\
&+&U_0 \sum_{k_1,k_2}\left(
\rho_{k+k_1,q'-k_1}^{(b)}-\rho_{k,q'-k_1}^{(b)}
\right)\rho_{k_2,k_1}^{(g)},\end{aligned}$$ with $\omega^{b}_{k,q'}=\omega^{b}_k - \omega^{b}_{k+q'}$. A similar equation holds for the grating particle-hole operators, with the substitution $b \leftrightarrow g$.
We consider a beam of $N_b$ atoms propagating toward the grating with some central transverse momentum $\overline{q}$. As discussed in the introduction the grating is taken to be in a superposition of states of transverse momenta $k-q/2$ and $k+q/2$, with $-k_{F,g}\leq k\leq k_{F,g}$, where $k_{F,g}=\pi N_g/L$ is the Fermi momentum (in one dimension) and $N_g$ is the number of atoms forming the grating. Such a grating can be prepared with two-photon Bragg pulses of bandwidth larger than the Fermi frequency $\hbar k^2_{F,g}/(2m_g)$ in a two-step process starting from a stationary homogeneous gas, see e.g. Ref. [@Tori00]. In that scheme, a $\pi$-pulse imparting a transverse momentum $-\hbar
q/2$ to each atom in the static cloud is followed by a $\pi/2$ Bragg pulse that creates the desired superposition state. Thus the initial state of beam-grating system is $$|\Psi(t=0)\rangle=|\Psi^{(b)}\rangle |\Psi^{(g)} \rangle,$$ where $$\begin{aligned}
\label{initialconditions}
&&\Ket{\Psi^{(b)}}= \prod_{|k| \leq k_{F,b}}
a^{\dag}_{k+\overline{q} \downarrow}\Ket{0}, \nonumber \\
&&\Ket{\Psi^{(g)}}=\prod_{|k| \leq
k_{F,g}} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(a^{\dag}_{k-q/2 \uparrow}+a^{\dag}_{k+q/2 \uparrow}\right)
\Ket{0}.\end{aligned}$$
The corresponding initial expectation values of the particle-hole operators are $$\begin{aligned}
\label{initialvalues} && \Braket{\Psi^{(b)} |\rho_{k,q'}^{(b)}(0)
| \Psi^{(b)}} = \delta_{q',0}\Theta(k_{F,b}-|k-\overline{q}|),
\nonumber\\
&& \Braket{\Psi^{(g)} |\rho_{k,q'}^{(g)}(0) |\Psi^{(g)}}
=\frac{1}{2}\left( \delta_{q',0} + \delta_{q',q}
\right)\Theta(k_{F,g}-|k+\frac{q}{2}|)\nonumber\\
& & +\frac{1}{2}\left( \delta_{q',0} + \delta_{q',-q}
\right)\Theta(k_{F,g}-|k-\frac{q}{2}|).\end{aligned}$$
In the following we assume that the matter-wave grating is sufficiently large that one can safely ignore the back-action of the atomic beam on its dynamics. Mathematically, this amounts to neglecting the term proportional to $U_0$ in the grating version of Eq. (\[particleholefullequations\]). In this limit, the grating simply undergoes a free evolution fully governed by its transverse kinetic energy.
Assuming, consistently with the assumption of a large grating, that the expectation value of products of beam and grating particle-hole operators can be factorized as $$\langle \hat{\rho}_{k,q}^{(g)}\hat{\rho}_{k',q'}^{(b)}\rangle
\approx \langle \hat{\rho}_{k,q}^{(g)}\rangle \langle
\hat{\rho}_{k',q'}^{(b)}\rangle,$$ making explicit use of the grating initial condition (\[initialvalues\]), and introducing the slowly varying particle-hole operators $$\rho_{k,q'}^{(b)}(t)=\hat{\rho}_{k,q'}^{(b)}(t)\exp[-i\omega_{k,q'}^{(b)}t],$$ and similarly for the grating, yields then the beam particle-hole Heisenberg equations of motion
$$\begin{aligned}
\label{lin}
\frac{d}{dt} \hat\rho_{k,p}^{(b)}= -ig(t)\left[
\hat\rho_{k+q,p-q}^{(b)}\exp(i\omega_{k,q}^{(b)}t)-
\hat\rho_{k,p-q}^{(b)}\exp(-i\omega_{k+p,-q}^{(b)}t)
-\hat\rho_{k-q,p+q}^{(b)}\exp(i\omega_{k,-q}^{(b)}t)+
\hat\rho_{k,p+q}^{(b)}\exp(-i\omega_{k+p,q}^{(b)}t) \right],\end{aligned}$$
where $$\label{timedepcoupling} g(t)=\frac{
U_0}{2}\sum_{k_2}\Theta(k_{F,g}-|k_2+q/2|)\exp[-i\omega_{k_2,q}^{(g)}t],$$ reduces in the continuum limit, $ \sum_k \rightarrow L/2 \pi \int
dk$, to $$g(t)=\frac{U_0N_g}{2}\mbox{sinc}(\hbar qk_{F,g}t/m_g).
\label{goft}$$ with $\mbox{sinc}(x)=\sin(x)/x$. For times larger than the [*dephasing time*]{} $$\tau_d \simeq \frac {\pi m_g}{\hbar q k_{F,g} }, \label{taud}$$ we have that $g(t) \simeq 0$, that is, the diffraction of the beam comes to a stop. This consequence of the dephasing between different momentum states of the atomic grating resulting from their free evolution, represents an essential difference between fermionic and bosonic four-wave mixing: the free evolution of a bosonic grating optically prepared from a Bose-Einstein condensate at zero temperature gives rise to a phase factor that can easily be transformed away. For fermions, though, it results in a dephasing and the effective shutting off of its interaction with the atomic beam.
This impact of the dephasing is particularly easy to see in the Raman-Nath regime of atomic diffraction. We recall that this is the regime where the kinetic energy of the atoms in the beam is small compared to the potential energy of the density grating. However, we retain the kinetic energies of the grating atoms, since they are responsible for the dephasing. As such, this model corresponds to the case where the atoms in the incident beam are much heavier than the atoms in the grating.
![Time evolution of the transverse mode populations of the diffracted beam, $\langle \hat{n}_k \rangle =\langle
\hat{\rho}_{k,0} \rangle$, in the Raman-Nath regime. The initial momentum spread of the beam is $k_{F,b}=3 q$. The effects of the dephasing grating become apparent. Time in units of the inverse mean-field interaction strength $U_0 N_{g}$ and $\tau_d=15$.[]{data-label="rn_fermions"}](fig2.eps){width="8cm" height="5cm"}
Approximating the exponential functions by unity in Eq. (\[lin\]) consistently with the Raman-Nath approximation gives $$\frac{d}{dt} \hat\rho_{k,p}^{(b)}=
-i g(t) \left( \hat\rho_{k-q,p+q}^{(g)}+\hat\rho_{k+q,p-q}^{(g)}-
\hat\rho_{k,p-q}^{(g)}- \hat\rho_{k,p+q}^{(g)}\right).$$ The solution of these operator equations for $g(t)=$ constant are known [@Rojo99] in terms of Bessel functions of the first kind of order $s$ as $$\begin{aligned}
\label{ramansol} &&\rho^{(b)}_{k,p}(t)=
\sum_{s,s'=-\infty}^{+\infty}i^{s-s'}J_s(U_0 N_g t) \nonumber\\
& & \times J_{s'}(U_0 N_g t) \rho^{(b)}_{k-sq,sq-s'q+p}(0).\end{aligned}$$ Due to conservation of momentum, only states of transverse momenta separated by integer multiples of $q$ are dynamically coupled. For a beam of initial momentum spread $k_{F,b} < q/2$, this implies that a linearly increasing sequence of replica of the initial distribution will be generated in time. Things are more complicated if $k_{F,b} \ge q/2$, since Pauli blocking leads to a situation where only those transverse modes near the edge of the distribution can initially be diffracted, creating holes into which modes deeper into the initial distribution can then subsequently be coupled. This results in an effective broadening of the initial distribution in time, as illustrated in the early stages of Fig. \[rn\_fermions\].
Since $g(t)$ is actually not a constant, the solution (\[ramansol\]) is only valid for times $t \ll \tau_d$. In general, it is necessary to solve the expectation value of the coupled Raman-Nath equations numerically. The effect of the grating diffusion, and the resulting vanishing of $g(t)$ for long enough times, are readily apparent in Fig. \[rn\_fermions\], which shows that the beam diffraction effectively ceases for $t >
\tau_d$. This is seen even more clearly in Fig. \[raman\_gt\], which compares the number of significantly occupied transverse modes with and without dephasing of the grating.
![Largest transverse momentum state with a significant population ($>
.03$) as a function of time in the presence (circles) and absence (crosses) of dephasing. Time is in units of the inverse mean-field frequency $U_0N_g$ and $\tau_d=15$. []{data-label="raman_gt"}](fig3.eps){width="8cm" height="5cm"}
Bragg Regime
============
We now turn to the analysis of the Bragg regime of fermionic atomic diffraction. We recall that for single atoms and a grating of period $2\pi/q$, this regime corresponds to the situation where only two degenerate modes, of transverse momenta $\pm q/2$, are coupled. The probabilities of occupation of these two states oscillate periodically in time, the so-called *Pendellösung* [@Bern81]. Bragg scattering is widely used in atomic beam splitters, both for single atoms [@Mart88] and for Bose-Einstein condensates [@Kozu99].
Fermi statistics complicate the situation in two ways: First, as we have seen, the distribution of momentum states in the grating around $\pm q/2$ leads to a dephasing resulting in the time-dependent coupling constant $g(t)$. In addition, only those fermions with initial transverse momentum sufficiently close to $q/2$ fulfill the Bragg condition. Hence, it is expected that Bragg diffraction will burn a spectral hole in the initial Fermi sea of the beam, leaving atoms away from that hole practically untouched.
We can gain some insight into the effects of the dephasing by considering a simple two-state model that retains only the coupling between the transverse modes $\pm q/2$, neglecting their coupling to higher-order modes. This approximation is justified if the phase-matching condition is strongly violated for these modes, in other words, if the difference in kinetic energy $\omega^{(b)}_{q/2,q}$ is much larger than the mean-field energy $\hbar U_0 N_g$ responsible for mode coupling, i.e., $$q^2 \gg 4\pi a \rho_g\frac{m_b}{\mu},$$ $\rho_g$ being the atomic density in the grating.
This situation is described by the closed set of operator equations $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{d}{dt}\hat{n}^{(b)}_{\pm q/2}&=&\pm ig(t)\left[
\hat{\rho}^{(b)}_{-q/2,q}+\mbox{c.c.}
\right],\nonumber\\
\frac{d}{dt}\hat{\rho}^{(b)}_{-q/2,q}&=& ig(t) \left[
\hat{n}^{(b)}_{q/2}- \hat{n}^{(b)}_{-q/2}\right],\end{aligned}$$ where $g(t)$ is given by Eq. (\[goft\]). These equations are reminiscent of the optical Bloch equations that describe the dynamics of a two-level atom driven by a resonant single-mode field of time-dependent amplitude, with the operators ${\hat n}$ corresponding to the populations of the two levels and the particle-hole operator $\hat{\rho}^{(b)}_{-q/2,q}$ to the atomic polarization. The evolution of their expectation values can readily be found for the initial conditions $\langle\hat{n}^{(b)}_{q/2}\rangle=1$ and $\langle\hat{n}^{(b)}_{-q/2}\rangle=0$ as $$\label{analytical} \langle\hat{n}^{(b)}_{\pm q/2}\rangle\left(
t\right)=\frac{1}{2}\left(1 \pm \cos\beta(t) \right),$$ where $$\label{beta}
\beta(t)=\int_0^t dt' g(t') = \frac{1}{2}N_{g}U_0 \int_0^t dt'
\mbox{sinc}\left( \frac{\hbar k_{F,g}q}{m_g}t'\right).$$ Similarly to the situation that we encountered in the Raman-Nath regime, the dephasing of the grating results in the diffraction effectively coming to an end after a time of the order of $\tau_d$.
![Time evolution of the transverse mode populations of a fermionic $\mbox{ }^{6}$Li-beam scattering off a $\mbox{ }^{40}$K-grating in the Bragg regime. Time is in units of the inverse mean-field frequency $N_g U_0$. In this example $\tau_d\approx 4.2/(N_{g}
U_0)$ and $\omega^{(b)}_q/N_gU_0=5$. The full momentum widths of the grating and of the beam are $1.0q$ and $0.25q$, respectively.[]{data-label="bwscatter"}](fig4.eps){width="8cm" height="5cm"}
Fig. \[bwscatter\] summarizes the results of the numerical integration of the full equations of motion (\[particleholefullequations\]) in the Bragg regime for a $\mbox{ }^{6}$Li beam scattering off a grating formed by $\mbox{
}^{40}$K atoms. It shows the population of the transverse modes of the atomic beam as a function of time for the case where the initial full transverse momentum width of the grating and beam are $1.0 q$ and $0.25 q$, respectively. The hole burned in the initial Fermi sea is clearly visible, as is the impact of the dephasing of the grating. The first maximum in the Pendell[ö]{}sung oscillations is strongly pronounced for modes near the phase matched mode $q/2$, but further maxima cannot be observed due the dephasing of the fermionic grating.
![$\eta$ as a function of beam size, $k_{F,b}$, for different sized gratings, with $\omega^{(b)}_q/N_gU_0=5$. The efficiency $\eta$ decreases with separately increasing size of the Fermi seas of beam and grating. Nevertheless for reasonably small momentum spreads a decent efficiency is obtained. []{data-label="eff_dephase"}](fig5.eps){width="8cm" height="5cm"}
One can characterize the “efficiency” $\eta$ of the four-wave mixing process by the first maximum of the quantity $$\eta(t)=\sum_{k=-q}^0 \langle \hat{n}_k\rangle\left( t
\right)/N_{b},$$ which measures the maximum fraction of atoms whose transverse momentum has been flipped about $k=0$. It is plotted in Fig. \[eff\_dephase\] as a function of the momentum spread of the incident $\mbox{ }^{6}$Li beam for three widths of the $\mbox{
}^{40}$K grating. The behavior of $\eta$ is as expected, since a wider incident beam contains more atoms that do not fulfill the Bragg condition, and a larger Fermi sea of the grating means a shorter dephasing time.
Experiments are likely to be carried out in a three-dimensional geometry, in which case the time-dependent coupling constant (\[timedepcoupling\]) becomes $$g_{3D}(t)=3U_0N_{g}\left( \mbox{sinc} \frac{t}{\tau_d}
-\cos\frac{t}{\tau_d} \right)\tau_d^2/t^2,$$ where $\tau_d$ is still given by Eq. (\[taud\]). It is easily seen that $g_{3D}(t)$ decays in a manner similar to $g(t)$, so that the lifetime of the grating is essentially the same as in one-dimension, provided that $k_{F,g}$ remains the same. Note however that these two times scale differently with the density of the grating, due to the different mode densities in one and three dimensions.
In order to assess the experimental feasibility of a fermionic Bragg diffraction experiment it is necessary to compare the dephasing time $\tau_d$ to the time $\tau_B$ that it would take to observe a full Pendell[ö]{}sung oscillation in the absence of dephasing. With the approximation $\beta(t)\approx N_gU_0t/2$ we have readily that $\tau_B \approx \pi/N_g U_0$. Hence, the observation of Pendell[ö]{}sung oscillations requires $$\frac{\tau_d}{\tau_B} = \left (\frac{2\pi}{(6\pi^2)^{1/3}}\right
)\left ( \frac{m_g}{\mu} \right )\left (\frac{a
\rho_g^{2/3}}{q}\right )\gg 1, \label{exp-cond}$$ where we have used the three-dimensional relationship between the density $\rho_g$ and $k_{F,g}$, $k_{F,g}=(6\pi^2 \rho_g)^{1/3}$.
Consider for example the diffraction of fermionic potassium $^{40}$K off a spin-polarized $^{40}$K grating of peak number density $\rho_g= 10^{15} \mbox{ cm}^{-3}$ and a scattering length of $85a_0$. Assuming a grating period of 500 nm $\tau_d\approx
0.1\tau_B$, so that Pendell[ö]{}sung oscillations will not be observable in that case. The next section discusses possible ways around this difficulty.
Atom Echoes
===========
The condition (\[exp-cond\]) shows that one possible way to increase the ratio of $\tau_d$ to $\tau_B$ is to increase the grating density $\rho_g$. This, however, is likely to be impractical. Another solution is to increase the scattering length $a$ via a Feshbach resonance. Noting that $m_g/\mu=(m_g+m_b)/m_b$, we can also gain an order of magnitude or so in the ratio (\[exp-cond\]) by diffracting light fermions such as $^6$Li off a potassium grating. Ketterle *et. al* [@Kett01] also proposed a direct way to increase the decay time in three dimensions by reducing the effective Fermi wave vector in the direction of the grating by increasing the size of the Fermi sea in the other directions.
An alternative method that allows one to completely reverse the effects of the dephasing is based on the observation that this dephasing is coherent, simply resulting from the different kinetic energies of the atoms forming the grating. This is reminiscent of Doppler broadening in laser spectroscopy, which leads to a dephasing of the atomic polarization. In that case, the dephasing can easily be reversed by photon echo techniques [@abel66]. Things are slightly more complicated here, because the phase of the individual atoms is just given by their kinetic energy $\hbar^2 k^2/2m_g.$ The only way to reverse the sign of this phase is to reverse the mass of the atoms. This can be achieved by placing the atoms forming the grating in an additional periodic potential that gives them a [*negative effective mass*]{}.
![ Effective masses of $^{40}$K of the first two bands at the center of the first Brillouin zone as a function of $V_0$, in units of the recoil energy $E_r=\hbar^2 k^2 /2 m_g$ for an optical wavelength of 852 nm. []{data-label="effmass"}](fig6.eps){width="8cm" height="5cm"}
Ignoring two-body collisions as well as whatever external fields are required to prepare the initial grating (\[initialconditions\]) for now, the evolution of the grating atoms in the presence of an optical lattice is governed by the Hamiltonian $$H=\frac{\hat{p}^2}{2m}+\frac{V_0}{2}\cos(2k_Lx),$$ where $V_0$ is the lattice depth and $k_L$ the wave vector of the laser creating the periodic potential. The band structure associated with this potential is readily obtained numerically, yielding at the center of the first Brillouin zone the effective mass $$m_{\rm eff,n} = \hbar^2 \left( \frac{d^2E_n}{dk^2} \right)^{-1}
\Big|_{k=0},$$ where $n$ is the band index and $k$ is the quasi-momentum. Figure \[effmass\] plots this effective mass of $^{40}$K for the first two energy bands. As is well known, $m_{\rm eff}$ is alternatively positive and negative as the band index is increased. We remark that since $U_0$ is a pseudo-potential adjusted so that the scattering problem associated with two-body collisions asymptotically produces the correct collisional cross-section, the appearance of an effective mass does not change the reduced mass $\mu$ in Eq. (\[U0\]). Hence Eq. (\[exp-cond\]) becomes $$\frac{\tau_d}{\tau_B} = \left (\frac{2\pi}{(6\pi^2)^{1/3}}\right
)\left ( \frac{m_{\rm eff}}{\mu} \right )\left (\frac{a
\rho_g^{2/3}}{q}\right ).$$ From Fig. \[effmass\], we see that the effective mass can be orders of magnitude larger than $m_g$, leading to much easier conditions to satisfy to observe fermionic Bragg diffraction.
![Comparison between the rephasing of the Pendell[ö]{}sung oscillations by the atom echoes technique (upper plots) to the case where the dephasing has been arbitrarily turned off (lower plots). In the plots white corresponds to unit probability and black indicates zero probability. All parameters as in Fig. \[bwscatter\].[]{data-label="compare"}](fig7.eps){width="8cm" height="11cm"}
Even more interesting is the use of the negative effective mass associated with the second energy band, since it permits a full reversal of the dephasing. The excitation of the grating atoms to that band can be achieved e.g. via a two-photon Raman with co-propagating laser beams, or by modulating the phase of one of the lattice beams. Assuming for simplicity that the effective masses corresponding to the $n=1$ and $n=2$ bands are equal in magnitude, it is easily seen that if the Raman pulse is applied at time $t_1$, then $g(t_2=2t_1)= g(0)$, and the dephasing has been completely reversed. Clearly, a sequence of pulses alternatively transferring the grating atoms between the two energy bands will keep alternating the sign of $m_{\rm eff}$, thereby continuously compensating the Doppler broadening. In case the magnitude of curvatures of the two bands are different, the rephasing time needs to be appropriately adjusted.
Fig. \[compare\] shows the result of this atom echo technique. The second peak of the *Pendellösung* is now clearly visible, in contrast to the situation in Fig. \[bwscatter\]. For better comparability to the case of uncontrolled dephasing we considered the same magnitudes for effective and real mass. We have transferred the atoms to the first band at scaled time $t=3$ and back to the lowest band at $t=9$. The results of the dephasing of the grating start again later on, but could be eliminated by transferring the atoms back to the first energy band.
Conclusion
==========
In this paper, we have investigated the behavior of purely fermionic scattering, i.e. a beam of fermions diffracted by a fermionic density grating, in the limit of a large grating. We explored different regimes which are determined by the relative magnitude of mean field energy and kinetic energy. Fermi statistic shows its distinct signatures in the limited lifetime of the grating and the inability to satisfy the Bragg condition for large input beams. We proposed novel ways to increase the dephasing time of the fermionic grating which is the most severe limitation for fermionic four-wave mixing. Future work will focus on the complex dynamics arising from the back-action of the scattered atoms on the grating.
This work is supported in part by the US Office of Naval Research, by the National Science Foundation, by the US Army Research Office, by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and by the Joint Services Optics Program. H. C. acknowledges the support of the Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes.
[99]{} G. Lenz, P. Meystre, and E. M. Wright, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**71**]{}, 3271 (1993). L. Deng, E. W. Hageley, J. Wen, M. Trippenbach, Y. Band, P. S. Julienne, J. E. Simsarian, K. Helmerson, S. L. Rolston, and W. D. Phillips, Nature [**398**]{}, 218 (1999). S. Innouye, T. Pfau, A. P. Chikkatur, A. Görlitz, D. E. Pritchard and W. Ketterle, Nature [**402**]{}, 641 (1999); M. Kozuma, Y. Suzuki, Y. Torii, T. Sugiura, T. Kuga, E. W. Hagley, and L. Deng, Science [**286**]{}, 2309 (1999). S. Innouye, A. P. Chikkatur, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, J. Stenger, D. E. Pritchard, and W. Ketterle, Science [**281**]{}, 571 (1999). S. Burger, K. Bongs, S. Dettmer, W. Ertmer, K. Sengstock, A. Sanpera, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**83**]{}, 5198 (1999). K. E. Strecker, G. B. Partridge, A. G. Truscott, and R. G. Hulet, Nature [**417**]{}, 150 (2002). J. M. Vogels, K. Xu, and W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**89**]{}, 020401 (2002). R. Wynar, R. S. Freeland, D. J. Han, C. Ryu, and D. J. Heinzen, Science [**287**]{}, 1016 (2000). C. McKenzie *et al.*, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**88**]{}, 120403 (2002). W. Ketterle, and S. Inouye, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**86**]{}, 4203 (2001). M. G. Moore, and P. Meystre, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**86**]{}, 4199 (2001). A. G. Truscott, K. E. Strecker, W. I. McAlexander, G. B. Partridge, R. G. Hule, Science [**291**]{}, 2570 (2001); F. Schreck, G. Ferrari, K. L. Cubizolles, L. Khaykovich, M.–O. Mewes, and C. Salomon, Phys. Rev. A [**64**]{}, 011402 (2001). B. DeMarco, and D. S. Jin, Science [**285**]{}, 1703 (1999). Z. Hadzibabic, C. A. Stan, K. Dieckmann, S. Gupta, M. W. Zwierlein, A. Görlitz, and W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**88**]{}, 160401 (2002). G. Roati, F. Riboli, G. Mondugno, and M. Ingusco, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**89**]{}, 150403 (2002). K. M. O’Hara, S. L. Hemmer, M. E. Gehm, S. R. Granade, and J. E. Thomas, Science Express Report, November 7, 2002, report possible evidence of superfluidity in a strongly correlated quantum-degenerate Fermi system. C. P. Search, and P. Meystre, cond-mat/0210492 B. W. Shore, P. Meystre, and S. Stenholm, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B [**8**]{}, 903 (1991). H. Deng and Y. Yamamoto, unpublished. A. G. Rojo, J. L. Cohen, and P. R. Berman, Phys. Rev. A [**60**]{}, 1482 (1999). C. P. Search, H. Pu, W. Zhang, and P.Meystre, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**88**]{}, 110401 (2002). G. Lenz, P. Pax, and P. Meystre, Phys. Rev. A [**48**]{}, 1707 (1993). P. Villain, P. Öhberg, L. Santos, and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. A [**64**]{}, 023606 (2001). Y. Torii, Y. Suzuki, M. Kozuma, T. Sugiura, T. Kuga, L. Deng and E. W. Hagley, Phys. Rev. A [**61**]{}, 041602 (2000). A. F. Bernhardt, and B. W. Shore, Phys. Rev. A [**23**]{}, 1290 (1981). P. J. Martin, B. G. Oldaker, A. H. Miklich, and D. E. Pritchard, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**60**]{}, 515 (1988). M. Kozuma, L. Deng, E. W. Hagley, J. Wen, R. Lutwak, K. Helmerson, S. L. Rolston, and W. D. Phillips, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**82**]{}, 871 (1999). I. D. Abella, N. A. Kurnit, and S. T. Hartmann, Phys. Rev. [**141**]{}, 391 (1966).
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'Lattice thermal conductivities $\kappa_{\rm L}$ of type-I clathrates encapsulating “off-center" guest atoms behave in a way that is sharply different from those of conventional crystals such as on-center type-I clathrates. The latter decreases with increasing temperature according to 1/$T$ above a few tensK. While, $\kappa_{\rm L}$ of off-center clathrates increase T-linearly above a few tensK. Further increasing temperature above $T\gtrsim$100K, $\kappa_{\rm L}$ saturates without exhibiting appreciable T-dependence. In this temperature regime, the standard formulation of $\kappa_{\rm L}$ based on the perturbation theory is unfeasible. We herein present a theory of $\kappa_{\rm L}$ based on “non-perturbative" approach by taking into account the interaction between non-vibrational off-center rattling states of guest atoms and cage shells. It is remarkable that our theory shows excellent agreement with observed $\kappa_{\rm L}(T)$ for off-center clathrates in magnitudes, the cage volume $\Omega$-dependence and T-dependence.'
author:
- Qing Xi
- Zhongwei Zhang
- Tsuneyoshi Nakayama
- Jie Chen
- Jun Zhou
- Baowen Li
title: 'Off-center Rattling Triggers High-Temperature Thermal Transport in Thermoelectric Clathrates: Non-Perturbative Approach '
---
INTRODUCTION
============
High-temperature thermal transport is a crucial issue in the search of efficient thermoelectric materials. This is because operating temperatures of thermopower devices are higher than room temperature. Efficient thermoelectric effects should be achieved by materials possessing both “glass-like" low lattice thermal conductivity and crystal-like high electrical conductivity.[@Slack1995; @Beekman2015; @Takabatake2014] Here, the glass-like thermal conductivity is characterized from low temperature regions as follows[@Takabatake2014]: (i) $\kappa_{\rm L}$ is proportional to $T^{2+\delta}$ ($\delta\ll 1$)below a few K. (ii) The plateau region from a few K to a few tensK. (iii) The T-linear rise above the plateau from $\sim$10 K to 100K. (iv) The saturate regime independent of $T$ above $T\gtrsim$100K. These are the prominent hallmarks of “glass-like" thermal conductivities, almost identical to those of structural glasses. Type-I clathrates are promising thermoelectric material fulfilling the concept of phonon-glass electron crystal concept. In actual, $\kappa_{\rm L}$ of type-I clathrates with off-center guest atoms behave like those of structural glasses.[@Takabatake2014; @Beekman2015] See Fig. 1. Type-I clathrate R$_{8}$M$_{16}$Z$_{30}$ (R=Ba, Sr, Eu; M and Z=Al, Ga, In, Si, Ge, Sn) has a $Pm\bar{3}n$ cubic structure, formed by the network cages consisting of face-sharing polyhedrons (dodecahedron and tetrakaidecahedron) and the encapsulated guest atoms.[@Takabatake2014] Guest atoms in tetrakaidecahedral cages will take off-center positions when the ionic radius of guest atoms is relatively small compared with the cage radius[@Sales2001], which has been observed in Sr$_{8}$Ga$_{16}$Ge$_{30}$[@Chakoumakos2000; @Sales2001], Eu$_{8}$Ga$_{16}$Ge$_{30}$[@Sales2001], Ba$_{8}$Ga$_{16}$Sn$_{30}$[@Suekuni2008], Ba$_{7.81}$Ge$_{40.67}$Au$_{5.33}$[@Lory2017] by means of x-ray and neutron diffraction methods. The off-center guest atoms break the translational invariance of the systems. More importantly, the weakly bounded guest atoms in cages with large open space execute non-vibrational motion above $T\gtrsim$100K with large atomic displacement parameter.[@Chakoumakos2001; @Qiu2004; @Okamoto2006; @Christensen2013; @Chakoumakos2000; @Chakoumakos2001] In this context, we should mention the concept of part-crystalline part-liquid state which has been proposed for filled skutterudites,[@Qiu2014; @Qiu2016] indicating that the non-vibrational state of rattling guest atoms is a general aspect at high temperature for host-guest systems.
![(Color online) Temperature dependence of $\kappa_{\rm L}$ plotted in linear scale for various off-center type-I clathrates[@Suekuni2008; @Suekuni2007; @Cohn1999; @Bentien2004; @Sales2001] and “on-center" type-I $\rm Ba_{8}Ga_{16}Ge_{30}$[@Sales2001]. The parentheses \[...\] in inset give reference numbers. []{data-label="fig61"}](fig1.eps){width="1.0\linewidth"}
Let us begin by giving a brief summary on previous theoretical results on $\kappa_{\rm L}(T)$ of off-center type-I clathrates. The (i) described in the first paragraph in Introduction has been successfully interpreted by the two-level tunnelling states caused from frustrated electric-dipole configuration concerning to off-center guest ions.[@Nakayama2008; @Kaneshita2009] The relevance of the localization-delocalization (LD) transition on the onset of the plateau at a few K(ii) has been demonstrated for the first time by means of large-scale numerical simulations.[@Liu2016] In addition, the T-linear rise above a few tensK (iii) has been explained by the hopping of strongly localized modes assisted by acoustic phonons.[@Xi2017] For these disordered systems, large-scale simulation based on *ab initio* calculation is difficult as seen from the discrepancy between simulation results and experimental measurements of room temperature lifetimes.[@Lory2017] While, the coarse-grained Hamiltonian is effective since [the]{} wave-lengths $\lambda$ of acoustic phonons at THz frequency region are much larger than the size of unit cell $a_0\simeq$1nm including 8 guest atoms and 46 cage atoms [bounded]{} by strong covalent-bonding. However, despite the importance of the issue (iv) in the search of efficient thermoelectric materials, the underlying mechanism is yet to be explained. Here we aim at a theoretical elucidation of the underlying mechanism of heat transfer at $T\gtrsim$100K. For this purpose, we discuss the problem from a general point of view by proposing a theoretical model of heat transfer in host-cage systems with off-center rattling guest atoms. In this sense, the mechanism proposed here is applicable to a wide class of host-guest systems involving weakly bounded atoms in void/open structures.
Energy flux in the rattling regime $T\gtrsim T\rm{_R}$
======================================================
Type-I clathrates encapsulating “off-center" guest atoms in tetrakaidecahedron cages are composed of networked host-cages of a simple cubic structure. We give a 3D Video obtained from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations for type-I $\rm Ba_{8}Ga_{16}Sn_{30}$ involving off-center guest atoms in Supplemental Material[@SM_Video], which visualizes that guest atoms at 400K perform “off-center" rattling motion, which are not assigned as vibrational states satisfying the condition $\omega\tau>1$. Meanwhile, cage atoms vibrate with smaller amplitudes around their equilibrium positions described as vibrational states. At 10K, however, guest atoms locate at off-center positions in cages, and vibrate there. This aspect is consistent with THz-frequency spectroscopy data for off-center type-I BGS observed at various temperatures.[@Mori2011; @Kume2015] The data exhibit two peaks at 0.5 and 0.7 THz frequencies at $T_{\rm R}\simeq$100K. Those are assigned as librational and stretching modes relevant to off-center guest atoms in type-I BGS.[@Nakayama2011] Increasing temperature, these two peaks collapse into a single peak at 0.75 THz with comparable width. However, such a characteristic has not been observed for on-center type-I BGG[@Mori2011; @Kume2015]. These spectroscopic data provide a strong evidence for off-center guest atoms to behave as off-center rattlers in cages at $T\gtrsim T\rm{_R}$. The rattling temperature $T\rm{_R}$ should play a crucial role for $\kappa_{\rm L}(T)$ in type-I clathrates with off-center guest atoms. Firstly, at $T\lesssim T\rm{_R}$, the systems take disordered configuration of guest atoms, and it converts into higher symmetry at $T\gtrsim T\rm{_R}$ where guest atoms behave as rattlers in cages. Secondary, the strong covalent-bonding between cage atoms ensures the existence of acoustic phonons in host cages even at $T\gtrsim T\rm{_R}$ in contrast to rattling states of weakly bound guest atoms[@SM_Video]. At $T\lesssim T\rm{_R}$, the standard kinetic formula $\kappa_{\rm L}(T)=1/(3V)\sum_{\bf k{\rm s}}C_V(\omega_s)v_s^2\tau(\omega_s)$ is valid under the condition $\omega\tau>1$[@Landau_Physical_Kinetics]. At $T\gtrsim T_{\rm R}$, however, off-center guest atoms cannot be described as vibrational states and the perturbation treatment is unavailable in contrast to the case of on-center clathrates.[@Tadano2015; @Tadano2018] We employ the formulation of energy flux available for non-vibrational states of rattling atoms. Hardy[@Hardy1963] has presented the rigorous formulation on the heat transfer, from which it is straightforward to deduce the version of energy flux working at $T\gtrsim T\rm{_R}$ by taking the limit $\hbar\rightarrow$ 0. The local heat flux density $\jj(\xx, t)$ is obtained from the continuity equation for the energy density $h(\xx,t)=\sum_{\ell}\epsilon_\ell(t)\delta(\xx-\rr_\ell)$ given by the time-dependent total energy $\epsilon_\ell (t)$ of $\ell$-th atom at the position vector $\rr_\ell$. The average energy flux is defined as $\JJ=(1/V)\int^V\jj(\xx)dV$, which yields[@Voltz2000]$$\begin{aligned}
\JJ(t)=\frac{1}{V}\frac{d}{dt}\left[\sum_\ell\rr_\ell (t) \epsilon_\ell (t)\right] .
\label{eq_JJ_11}\end{aligned}$$ By decomposing the contributions from guest atom $i$ and cage atom $j$ by taking $\ell=i~{\rm or}~j$, we have the following expression for the guest atom energy $\varepsilon_i(t)$ and the cage-atom’s $E_j(t)$, which are composed of the interaction potentials $V_{ij}^{CG}$ between guest atoms ($i)$ and cage atoms ($j$) and $V_{jj'}^{CC}$ between cage atoms ($j,j'$), $$\begin{aligned}
\varepsilon_i(t)&=&\frac{1}{2}m\dot{\xx}_i^2(t)+\frac{1}{2}\sum_jV_{ij}^{CG}(\XX_j,\xx_i),
\nonumber
\\
E_j(t)&=&\frac{1}{2}M_j\dot{\XX}_j^2(t)
+\frac{1}{2}\sum_{j'}V_{jj'}^{CC}(\XX_j,\XX_{j'})
\nonumber
\\
&+&\frac{1}{2}\sum_iV_{ji}^{CG}(\XX_j,\xx_i),
\label{eq_EE_11}\end{aligned}$$ where $m$ and $M_j$ are masses of guest atoms and cage atoms, and the subscript $j$ on cage atoms is combined with the subscript $i$ of a guest atom since each cage involves only one guest atom, $i.e.$, $j\in i$. The position vector $\xx_i(t)$ of $i$-th guest atom is expressed by the sum of the small displacement $\qq_i(t)$ and the equilibrium position $\RR_i$, $\xx_i(t)=\RR_i+\qq_i(t)$, and the position vector of cage atom $j$ is given by $\XX_j(t)=\RR_j+\QQ_j(t)$ with $\QQ_j(t)$ the small displacement of cage atom. $\dot{\xx}_i(t)$ and $\dot{\XX}_j(t)$ are time-dependent velocities of the $i$-th guest atom and the $j$-th cage atom, respectively. The substitution of Eq.(\[eq\_EE\_11\]) into Eq.(\[eq\_JJ\_11\]) leads to[@Hardy1963; @Voltz2000] $$\begin{aligned}
\JJ(t)
&=&\frac{1}{V}\sum_{i,j\in i}\left[\varepsilon_i(t)\dot{\xx}_i(t)+E_j(t)\dot{\XX}_j(t) \right]
\nonumber
\\
&+&\frac{1}{V}\sum_{j,j'}\left[\left(\XX_j(t)-\XX_{j'}(t)\right)\FF_{jj'}^{CC}\cdot\dot{\XX}_j(t)\right]
\nonumber
\\
&+&\frac{1}{V}\sum_{i,j\in i}\left[\left(\xx_i(t)-\XX_j(t)\right)\FF_{ij}^{GC}\cdot\left(\dot{\xx}_i(t)+\dot{\XX}_j(t)\right)\right],
\label{eq_JJ_22}\end{aligned}$$ where the interatomic force $\FF_{jj'}^{CC}$ between cage atoms $j, j'$ and $\FF_{ij}^{GC}$ between guest atom $i$ and cage atom $j$ are defined by $$\begin{aligned}
\FF_{jj'}^{CC}=-\frac{\partial U_{j'}^{CC}}{\partial \XX_j}, \FF_{ij}^{GC}=-\frac{\partial U_{j}^{GC}}{\partial\xx_i},\end{aligned}$$ with $$\begin{aligned}
U_{j}^{CC}=1/2\sum_{j'}{V_{jj'}^{CC}(\XX_j,\XX_{j'})},
\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ and $$\begin{aligned}
U_{j}^{GC}&=&1/2\sum_{i}{V_{ji}^{GC}(\XX_j,\xx_i)},\end{aligned}$$ where $U_{j}^{CC}$ is the cage atom-cage atom interaction potential for the cage atom $j$, and $U_{j}^{GC}$ is the guest-cage potential for the cage atom $j$. Equation (\[eq\_JJ\_22\]) is applicable for non-vibrational states in gases and liquids. The first parenthesis in the right in Eq. (\[eq\_JJ\_22\]) describes the convective contribution to heat transfer, and the second and the third in the right are the conductive part. In off-center type-I clathrates, the location of guest atoms deviates significantly from the off-center equilibrium position at $T\gtrsim T_{\rm R}$. It is apparent, however, that guest atoms cannot diffuse to nearest neighbour cages. Consequently, we do not take into account the convectional terms in Eq. (\[eq\_JJ\_22\]).
The second parenthesis in the right in Eq. (\[eq\_JJ\_22\]) expresses the energy transfer in host cage, whose constituent atoms are bound by short-range covalent bonding. Type-I clathrates consist of 8 guest atoms and 46 cage atoms in unit cell, where optical modes attributing to these atoms are irrelevant to heat transfer. In addition, the time average of the relative distance between cage atoms in the same cage becomes $\overline{\XX_j(t)-\XX_{j'}(t)}=d_{jj'}$ for the dominant nearest neighbour coupling, where $d_{jj'}$ is the nearest-neighbour distance due to short-range covalent bonding, which is much smaller than the size of cage $2R$. While, at $T\gtrsim T_{\rm R}$, the relations $\overline{\xx_i-\XX_j}\cong R$ and $\dot{\xx}_i(t)\gg\dot{\XX}_{j\in i}$ holds in the third parentheses[@SM_Video]. As a result, the third term stemmed from rattling guest atoms should play a key role for the heat transfer at $T\gtrsim T{\rm _R}$. Thus, the dominant term for energy flux at $T\gtrsim T{\rm _R}$ in Eq. (\[eq\_JJ\_22\]) is given by $$\begin{aligned}
\JJ(t)=\frac{1}{V}\sum_{i,j\in i}^N\left[\xx_i(t)-\XX_j(t)\right] \FF_{ij}\cdot\dot{\xx}_i(t).
\label{eq_FF_33}\end{aligned}$$ To assess more definitely the impact of guest atoms on energy flux, we consider another aspect of the part of $\FF_{ij}\cdot\dot{\xx}_i$ in Eq. (\[eq\_FF\_33\]) using the relation $$\sum_{j\in i}\FF_{ij}\cdot\dot{\xx}_i(t)=\dot{\varepsilon}_{i}.$$ This relation yields the thermal/time-averaged energy flux (heat flux) at $T$ given by $$\begin{aligned}
\langle\overline{\JJ(t)}\rangle=
\frac{N}{V} R\dot{\varepsilon}_{c}(T),
\label{eq_FF_44}\end{aligned}$$ where $\langle\cdots\rangle$ denotes the thermal average at a temperature $T$. The energy fluxes from individual cages are identical at each site because of the translational invariance of the system at the rattling regime $T\gtrsim T_{\rm R}$. So, we have employed the notation $\varepsilon_c$ for $\varepsilon_{i}$. Let us give a qualitative interpretation on the above formula. The kinetic energy $\varepsilon_c$ can be related with the local pressure $p_c$ in a cage and the cage volume $v_c$ by the relation $\varepsilon_c=p_c v_c$. The volume change $v_c+\delta v_c$ caused by the interaction between guest atom and cage atoms yields the energy change $\delta \varepsilon_c(t)=\varepsilon_c\Delta_c(t)$, where the dilation is given by $\Delta_c (t)=\delta v_c/v_c$. Consequently, the off-center rattling motion of guest atom trigger the energy transfer to host cage via deformation of cage shells. In thermal equilibrium, guest atoms convert their energies into cage-shell modes, and those are recovered by the reverse process.
Energy flux from rattling guest atoms to host cage at $T\gtrsim T_{\rm R}$
==========================================================================
Off-center rattling motion of guest atoms at $T\gtrsim T_{\rm R}$ triggers the energy exchange with host cages via the deformation of cages. This mechanism is identical to the emission of phonons from a small particle immersed in an elastic medium. We utilize the treatment on heat transfer from fine particles immersed in liquid He II[@Nakayama1981] and liquid $^3$He[@Nishiguchi1982] by modifying those to be applicable at high temperatures $T\gtrsim T_{\rm R}$. The mean rate of energy emitted from dilation modes of a cage is given by the square of the velocity field $\vv(\rr,t)$[@Landau_Fluid], $$\begin{aligned}
\dot{\varepsilon}_{\rm c}=\rho_{\rm s} v_{\rm \parallel}\oint_S |\vv(\rr)|^2dS,
\label{eq77}\end{aligned}$$ where $\rho_{\rm s}$ and $v_{\rm \parallel}$ are the mass density and the velocity of longitudinal phonons in host cage. $dS$ is the surface element surrounding a cage. Since the emitted energy is carried away by vibrations of a cage shell, it needs to relate the velocity field $\vv(\rr)$ at $\rr$ to $\vv(\RR)$ at the surface $\RR$ under the situation $|\rr|\geq|\RR|$.
The velocity fields at $\rr$ and $\RR$ can be related by introducing the scalar potential $\phi_q(\rr,t)$ defined by $\vv(\rr,t)={\rm grad}\,\phi(\rr,t)$[@Nakayama1981]. The radial component of the velocity field becomes, $$\begin{aligned}
|\vv^q(\rr)|^2=\frac{R^4}{r^4}\frac{1+(qr)^2}{1+(qR)^2}|v_r^q(\RR)|^2,
\label{eq99}\end{aligned}$$ where $q$ represents the wave number of emitted phonon. This provides the emission of spherical pressure (longitudinal) waves[@Nakayama1981]. The effect of shear (transverse) waves stemmed from the angular components $v_\theta^q(R)$ and $v^q_\phi(R)$ will be discussed later.
Substituting this relation into Eq.(\[eq77\]) and taking the closed surface of the integration to be a sphere of radius $r> R$, the mean energy emitted from a cage becomes $$\begin{aligned}
\dot{\varepsilon}_c^q=\rho_{\rm s}v_{\parallel}\frac{q^2R^4}{1+q^2R^2}\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^{\pi}|v_r^q(\RR)|^2d\Omega,
\label{eq99}\end{aligned}$$ where $d\Omega=\sin\theta d\theta d\phi$. The velocity field $v_r(\RR)$ at the surface of a cage must equal to the time derivative of the surface displacement of the cage, $i.e.$, $\vv(\RR,t)=\dot{\uu}(\RR,t)$. The $\uu(\RR,t)$ is expressed by the sum of the eigenmode $J$ for shell vibrations of cage, where $J$ stands for a set of quantum numbers ($\ell,m,\omega_q^{\ell,m}$) specifying the eigenmodes. By defining the eigenmode belonging to the eigenfrequency $\omega_J$ as $\vec{\psi}_J(\RR)$, the displacement operator is expressed by $$\uu(\RR,t)=\sum_J\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2\rho_{\rm s}\omega_J\Omega}} (a_J\vec{\psi}_J(\RR)e^{-i\omega_J t}+\rm{H.c.}),$$ where $\Omega$ and $\rho_{\rm s}$ are the volume and the mass density of cage, respectively, and $a_J$ and $a_J^\dagger$ are the Boson operators of the mode $J$. The eigenfunction $\vec{\psi}_J(r)$ represents spherical wave emitted from a cage. The thermal-averaged total energy emitted from a cage via longitudinal phonons is obtained by summing up $J$ for Eq.(\[eq99\]), which yields $$\begin{aligned}
&\dot{\varepsilon}_c(T)=\rho_{\rm s}v_{\rm \parallel}\sum_J\frac{q^2R^4}{1+q^2R^2}
\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^{\pi}d\Omega
\nonumber
\\
&\times<\dot{u}_r^J(\RR,t)^\dagger\dot{u}_r^J(\RR,t)>,
\label{eq1111}\end{aligned}$$ where $\dot{u}_r(\RR)$ represents the normal component of the velocity field at the surface of a cage. The thermal average is defined by $$<\dot{u}_r^J(R)^\dagger \dot{u}_r^J(R)>={\rm Tr}[e^{-\beta H}\dot{u}_r^J(R)^\dagger \dot{u}_r^J(R)],$$ where $H=\sum_J\hbar\omega_J a_J^\dagger a_J$ and $\beta=1/k_{\rm B}T$. Noting $<a_J^{\dagger} a_J>=n(\omega_J,T)$ given by the Bose-Einstein distribution function, the integral in Eq.(\[eq1111\]) yields[@Nakayama1981] $$\begin{aligned}
&\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^{\pi}<\dot{u}_r^J(\RR)^\dagger\dot{u}_r^J(\RR)>d\Omega
=\frac{\hbar\omega_J}{\rho_{\rm s}\Omega}n(\omega_J,T)
\nonumber
\\
&\times\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^{\pi}
d\Omega
\left(\frac{\partial j^\ell}{\partial x}\mid_{r=R}^2+\left[ {\rm Higher\,order\,terms}\right]\right),
\label{eq1212}\end{aligned}$$ where $j^\ell(x)$ with $x=qr$ is the $\ell$-th order spherical Bessel function of the first kind.
![(Color online) Observed $\kappa_{\rm L}$ for various off-center type-I clathrates as a function of $k_{\rm B}v_{\rm s}/\Omega^{2/3}$[@Suekuni2008; @Suekuni2007; @Cohn1999; @Bentien2004; @Lory2017; @Qiu2004; @Christensen2016; @Paschen2001; @Bentien2005]. Solid inverted-triangle on off-center Eu$_{8}$Ga$_{16-x}$Sn$_{30+x}$ denotes the thermal conductivity averaged for $x=0.47-0.76$[@Bentien2005]. The dashed line is a guide for the eyes showing good agreement with Eq.(\[eq1416\]) for $\gamma=4.2$. The parentheses \[...\] in inset give reference numbers. []{data-label="fig66"}](fig2.eps){width="1.0\linewidth"}
It should be emphasized that, since the size of cage is small enough $2R\approx 5\AA$, the lowest symmetric mode of cavity-cage dominantly contributes to the energy transfer. Higher order terms in the parenthesis in Eq.(\[eq1212\]) provide small contribution. Thus, the most effective process occurs in the fundamental mode ($\ell$=0) with the eigenfrequency $\omega^0=2\pi v_s/\lambda_0$ attributing to the lowest spherical Bessel function $\ell$=0 of the form $j^0(x)=\sin x/x$ in Eq.(\[eq1212\]). The wave-length $\lambda_0$ should be $\lambda_0=4R$ for the cage with the radius $R$. The heat conductance is defined by $h(T)=\partial_TJ(T)$ from the relation $J(T+\Delta T)-J(T)=h(T)\Delta T$. By taking the high temperature relation $n(\omega_J,T)=k_{\rm B}T/\hbar\omega_J$ in Eq.(\[eq1212\]) and substituting the results of Eq.(\[eq1111\]) into Eq.(\[eq\_FF\_44\]), we have the heat conductance due to the emission of longitudinal acoustic phonons from a cage as $$\begin{aligned}
h_{\parallel}(T)=
\frac{4\pi k_{\rm B}v_{\rm \parallel}q_o^2R^5}{(1+q_0^2R^2)\Omega^2}
\frac{\partial j^0(q_0r)}{\partial x}\mid_{r=R}^2,
\label{eq1313}\end{aligned}$$ where we have used the relation $N/V=1/\Omega$ for the number density of off-center guest atoms, not the number density of all atoms in the systems. It should be noted that $\hbar$ is cancelled out in Eq.(\[eq1313\]). This is consistent with the fact that the classical-dynamics works in the rattling regime $T\gtrsim T_{\rm R}$. The $\partial j^0(x)/\partial x\mid_{r=R}$ in Eq.(\[eq1313\]) equals the first-order spherical Bessel function $$j^1(x)=\sin x/x^2-\cos x/x,$$ with $x=q_0R=\pi/2$ from $4R=\lambda_0$. This gives rise to the heat conductance $$h_{\parallel}(T)=\alpha_{\parallel} k_{\rm B}v_{\parallel}/\Omega,$$ where the prefactor is given by $$\alpha_{\parallel}= 3(q_0R)^2j^1(q_0R)^2/(1+q_0^2R^2),$$ using the relation $\Omega=4\pi R^3/3$. It is straightforward to incorporate the effect of shear (transverse $\perp$) waves stemmed from the angular components of the velocities $v_\theta^q(\RR)$ and $v^q_\phi(\RR)$ according to the treatment of the heat transfer from small particles to liquid $^3$He[@Nishiguchi1982]. Note that transverse modes propagate in liquid $^3$He, but not in liquid $^4$He. The prefactor $\alpha_\perp$ is obtained by taking into account the dominant contribution from the lowest order of modes, $i.e.$, by replacing $\partial j^0(x)/\partial x\mid_{r=R}^2$ and $v_\parallel$ in Eq.(\[eq1313\]) with the eigenfunctions of shear modes and $v_\perp$[@Nishiguchi1982]. The thermal conductivity $\kappa_{\rm L}$ is obtained from the total conductance $h(T)=h_\parallel(T)+h_\perp(T)$ by multiplying the lattice constant $a_0$ of type-I clathrates with off-center guest atoms using the relation $a_0/2=2R$. This is expressed in terms of the cage volume $\Omega$ as, $$\begin{aligned}
\kappa_{\rm L}(T)=\gamma\frac{k_{\rm B}v_{\rm s}}{\Omega^{2/3}},
\label{eq1416}\end{aligned}$$ where $v_{\rm s}$ is the average velocity of acoustic phonons defined by $v_{\rm s}=(v_{\parallel}+2v_{\perp})/3$. This expression directly provides the relevance of guest atoms to high-temperature $\kappa_{\rm L}(T)$ via the cage volume $\Omega$. We can evaluate the prefactor as $\gamma=2.61$ from the expressions of $\alpha_\parallel$ and $\alpha_\perp$. This $\gamma$-value attributes to the contribution from fundamental modes of a cage, so it should be considered as the lower limit of $\kappa_{\rm L}^{min}$ at $T\gtrsim T_R$. The proper value of $\gamma$ can be obtained by incorporating higher-order terms of modes. Thus, the prefactor $\gamma=4.2$ estimated in Fig.\[fig66\] can be recovered. Equation(\[eq1416\]) shows T-independent saturated $\kappa_{\rm L}$ in accord with the observations shown in Fig.\[fig61\]. The $\Omega$-dependence in Eq.(\[eq1416\]) is consistent with the experimental data for off-center clathrates showing “glass-like" thermal conductivity as seen from Fig.\[fig66\], in addition to the agreement with observed magnitudes of $\kappa_{\rm L}(T)$.
Relevance to the concept of the minimum thermal conductivity
============================================================
The concept of the minimum thermal conductivity (MTC) was first proposed by Slack[@Slack1979] by employing the standard formula of thermal conductivity $\kappa(T)=(1/3V)\sum_{\kk}C_Vv_s\ell$. This formula yields $$\kappa_{min}^{SK}(T)=\frac{\kB v_s\left(6\pi^2n\right)^{2/3}}{2\pi}\times I(x_D),
\label{eqslack}$$ where the transport integral is given by $$I(x_D)=\frac{2}{x_D^2}\int_0^{x_D}\frac{x^3 e^x dx}{(e^x-1)^2}.$$ Here, $x=\hbar\omega/\kB T$ and $x_D=\hbar\omega_D/\kB T$ with the Debye cut-off frequency $\omega_D$. The number density of atoms $n$ is related to the Debye temperature by $\theta_D=\hbar v_s (6\pi^2 n)^{1/3}/\kB$ of “monoatomic” systems. The term $x^3$ in the transport integral comes from the combination of the Debye density of states and the postulated mean-free-path of acoustic phonons of the form $\ell(\omega)=2\pi v_s/\omega$ or equivalently $q\ell(\omega)=2\pi$, which is identical to the Ioffe-Regel (IR) criterion for strongly localized (SL) modes except the factor 2. In the SL regime, the mean-free-path $\ell$ and the localization length collapse into a single length scale, $i.e.$, those have the same meaning. The prefactor $\kB v_s\left(6\pi^2n\right)^{2/3}/2\pi$ in $\kappa_{min}^{SK}(T)$ provides the MTC at high temperatures. Cahill and Pohl[@Cahill1987] have explicitly postulated that “all" acoustic phonons are strongly localized with the localization length $\ell\simeq\lambda/2$ according to the Ioffe-Regel (IR) criterion of $q\ell(\omega)=\pi$[@Ioffe1960]. The formula[@Cahill1987] is given by $$\kappa_{min}^{CP}=\frac{\kB v_s(6\pi^2 n)^{2/3}}{4\pi}\times I(x_D).$$ This is the same as $\kappa_{min}^{SK}$ in Eq.(\[eqslack\]) except the factor 2 in the denominator stemmed from the IR criterion employed. These $\kappa_{min}^{SK/CP}$ are proportional to the number density of atoms according to $n^{2/3}$. In applying the formula for actual systems with many atoms in unit cell such as the case of type-I clathrates with 54 atoms in unit cell or fullerene derivatives[@Duda2013; @Wang2013], it is crucial that the Debye model[@Cahill1987; @Slack1979] not allowing modes $\omega\geq\omega_D$ exhausts the number of degrees of freedom. Thus, the MTC formula gives rise to the overestimation of $\kappa_{min}$ for these systems.[@Duda2013; @Wang2013] In addition, the formulae[@Cahill1987; @Slack1979] give the temperature dependence proportional to $T^2$ at $T\lesssim\theta_D$. This prediction is conflict with the experimental data $\kappa_L (T)\propto T$ above the plateau temperature region from a few tensK to $\sim$100K of off-center clathrates and structural glasses (iii).[@Takabatake2014] The discrepancy arises from their postulate that all acoustic phonons are strongly localized. This postulate is “only" valid for fracton excitations in fractal structures.[@Nakayama1994] Thus, the physical basis of our theory based on non-perturbative approach is distinct from these MTC.
Summary
=======
We have given a theory on the underlying mechanism governing high-temperature $\kappa_{\rm L}(T)$ of type-I clathrates with off-center guest atoms, focusing on the regime at $T\gtrsim T_R$. Our approach is based on non-perturbative treatment, different from the standard one according to the perturbation theory. As seen from the 3D Video of MD simulations in Supplemental Material, off-center rattling motion of guest atoms perform spontaneous displacement with large amplitude in cages, which induces the deformation of surrounding cages, and the energy exchange between cage and guest atom occurs via phonon emission/absorption. We point out that the theory proposed here is applicable for host-guest systems involving weakly bound atoms in void/open structures, although we have exemplified the systems of off-center clathrates. It is remarkable that the prediction of the formula Eq.(\[eq1416\]) shows excellent agreement with observed $\kappa_{\rm L}(T)$ for off-center clathrates in magnitude, temperature dependence and the cage-volume $\Omega$ dependence. To conclude, our theoretical investigation based on non-perturbative approach provides one of guiding principles for searching and designing efficient thermoelectric materials operating at high temperatures with very low lattice thermal conductivities. In addition, the principal mechanism described here works for a wide class of complex disordered systems such as structural glasses involving weakly bound atoms in void structures. These are in some respects similar to those of clathrates with rattling guest atom. Finally, we note that large-scale MD simulations of heat transfer for our systems are effective to demonstrate the validity of the present theory.
*Acknowledgments* This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No. 11334007. T.N. acknowledges the support from Grand-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the MEXT in Japan, Grand No.26400381. J.Z. is supported by the program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning No. TP2014012. J. C. thanks the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51506153).
[99]{} G. A. Slack, in *CRC Handbook of Thermoelectrics*, edited by D. M. Rowe (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL,1995), pp.407-440.
T. Takabatake, K. Suekuni, T. Nakayama, and E. Kaneshita, Rev. Mod. Phys. [**86**]{}, 669 (2014).
M. Beekman, D. T. Morelli, and G. S. Nolas, Nat. Mater. [**14**]{}, 1182 (2015).
K. Suekuni, M. A. Avila, K. Umeo, H. Fukuoka, S. Yamanaka, T. Nakagawa, and T. Takabatake, Phys. Rev. B [**77**]{}, 235119 (2008).
B. C. Sales, B. C. Chakoumakos, R. Jin, J. R. Thompson, and D. Mandrus, Phys. Rev. B [**63**]{}, 245113 (2001).
K. Suekuni, S. Yamamoto, M. A. Avila, and T. Takabatake, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. [**77**]{}, 61 (2008).
J. L. Cohn, G. S. Nolas, V. Fessatidis, T. H. Metcalf, and G. A. Slack, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**82**]{}, 779 (1999).
A. Bentien, M. Christensen, J. D. Bryan, A. Sanchez, S. Paschen, F. Steglich, G. D. Stucky, and B. B. Iversen, Phys. Rev. B [**69**]{}, 045107 (2004).
B. C. Chakoumakos, B. C. Sales, D. G. Mandrus, and G. S. Nolas, J. Alloys Compd. [**296**]{}, 80 (2000).
P-F. Lory, S. Pailh$\grave{\rm e}$s, V. M. Giordano, H. Euchner, H. D. Nguyen, R. Ramlau, H. Borrmann, M. Schmidt, M. Baitinger, M. Ikeda, P. Tome$\check{\rm s}$, M. Mihalkovi$\check{\rm c}$, C. Allio, M. R. Johnson, H. Schober, Y. Sidis, F. Bourdarot, L. P. Regnault, J. Ollivier, S. Paschen, Y. Grin, and M. de Boissieu, Nat. Commun. [**8**]{}, 491 (2017).
B. C. Chakoumakos, B. C. Sales, and D. G. Mandrus, J. Alloys Compd. [**322**]{}, 127 (2001).
L. Qiu, I. P. Swainson, G. S. Nolas, and M. A. White, Phys. Rev. B [**70**]{}, 035208 (2004).
N. L. Okamoto, K. Kishida, K. Tanaka, and H. Inui, J. Appl. Phys. [**100**]{}, 073504 (2006).
S. Christensen, M. A. Avila, K. Suekuni, R. Piltz, T. Takabatake, and M. Christensen, Dalton Trans. [**42**]{}, 14766 (2013).
W. Qiu, L. Xi, P. Wei, X. Ke, J. Yang, and W. Zhang, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. [**111**]{}, 15031 (2014).
W. Qiu, X. Ke, L. Xi, L. Wu, J. Yang, and W. Zhang, Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astrom. [**59**]{}, 627001 (2016). T. Nakayama and E. Kaneshita, Europhys. Lett. [**84**]{}, 66001 (2008).
E. Kaneshita and T. Nakayama, Europhys. Lett. [**86**]{}, 56004 (2009).
Y. Liu, Q. Xi, J. Zhou, T. Nakayama, and B. Li, Phys. Rev. B [**93**]{}, 214305 (2016).
Q. Xi, Z. Zhang, J. Chen, J. Zhou, T. Nakayama, and B. Li, Phys. Rev. B [**96**]{}, 064306 (2017).
See the 3D Video obtained from MD calculations in Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/...... The Supplementary Video for the atomic dynamics in type-I BGS visualizes that off-center guest atoms at 400K perform “off-center" rattling motion in cages by frequently changing their positions in cages, which cannot be assigned as vibrational states. Meanwhile, “cage atoms" vibrate with smaller amplitudes around their equilibrium positions at 400K. These vibrations are described as vibrational states. At lower temperature 10K, both cage atoms and guest atoms at off-center positions in cages manifest vibrational states satisfying $\omega\tau>1$.
T. Mori, K. Iwamoto, S. Kushibiki, H. Honda, H. Matsumoto, N. Toyota, M. A. Avila, K. Suekuni, and T. Takabatake, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**106**]{}, 015501 (2011).
T. Kume, T. Sukemura, S. Nakano, S. Sasaki. K. Suekuni, and T. Takabatake, Photon Factory Activity Report 2014, [**32**]{}, B (2015).; T. Sukemura, T. Kume, T. Matsuoka, S. Sasaki, T. Onimaru, and T. Takabatake, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., [**500**]{}, 182022 (2014).
T. Nakayama and E. Kaneshita, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., [**80**]{}, 104604(2011).
See, for example, E. M. Lifshitz and L. P. Pitaevskii, [*Physical Kintetics*]{}, Course of theoretical Physics by L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, vol. 10, (Elsevier Ltd., Amsterdam, 1981).
T. Tadano, Y. Gohda, and S. Tsuneyuki, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**114**]{}, 095501 (2015).
T. Tadano, and S. Tsuneyuki, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**120**]{}, 105901 (2018).
R. J. Hardy, Phys. Rev. [**132**]{}, 168(1963).
S. G. Voltz and G. Chen, Phys. Rev. B [**61**]{}, 2651 (2000).
T. Nakayama and N. Nishiguchi, Phys. Rev. B [**24**]{}, 6421 (1981).
N. Nishiguchi and T. Nakayama, Phys. Rev. B [**25**]{}, 5720 (1982).
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, [*Fluid Mechanics*]{}, 2nd Ed. (Elsevier Ltd., Singapore, 2004), Chap. 74.
S. Christensen, M. S. Schmokel, K. A. Borup, G. K. H. Madsen, G. J. Mclntyre, S. C. Capelli, M. Christensen and B. B. Iversen, Jour. Appl. Phys. [**119**]{}, 185102 (2016).
S. Paschen, W. Carrillo-Cabrera, A. Bentien, V. H. Tran, M. Baenitz, Yu. Grin, and F. Steglich, Phys. Rev. B [**64**]{}, 214404 (2001).
A. Bentien, V. Pacheco, S. Paschen, Yu. Grin, and F. Steglich, Phys. Rev. B [**71**]{}, 165206 (2005).
G. A. Slack, in *Solid State Physics*, edited by F. Seitz and D. Turnbull (Academic, New York, 1979), Vol.14, p.1-71. (1979).
D. G. Cahill and R.O. Pohl, Solid. State Commun. [**70**]{}, 927(1989); D. G. Cahill and R.O. Pohl, Phys. Rev. B, [**46**]{}, 6131(1992).
A. F. Ioffe and A. R. Regel, Prog. Semicond. [**4**]{}, 237(1960).
T. Nakayama, K. Yakubo, and R. L Orbach, Rev. Mod. Phys. [**66**]{}, 381(1994).
J. C. Duda, P. E. Hopkins, Y. Shen, and M. C. Gupta, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**110**]{}, 015902(2013).
X. Wang, C. D. Liman, N. D. Treat, M. L. Chabinyc, and D. G. Cahill, Phys. Rev. B [**88**]{}, 075310 (2013).
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'Using a full frequency-dependent atmosphere code that can incorporate irradiation by a central primary star, we calculate self-consistent boundary conditions for the evolution of the radius of the transiting planet HD 209458b. Using a well-tested extrasolar giant planet evolutionary code, we then calculate the behavior of this planet’s radius with age. The measured radius is in fact a transit radius that resides high in HD 209458b’s inflated atmosphere: Using our derived atmospheric and interior structures, we find that irradiation plus the proper interpretation of the transit radius can yield a theoretical radius that is within the measured error bars. We conclude that if HD 209458b’s true transit radius is at the lower end of the measured range, an extra source of core heating power is not necessary to explain the transit observations.'
author:
- 'Adam Burrows, D. Sudarsky and W.B. Hubbard'
title: A Theory for the Radius of the Transiting Giant Planet HD 209458b
---
Introduction {#intro}
============
These past seven years have seen the number of known extrasolar giant planets (EGPs) grow from 1 in 1995 (Mayor and Queloz 1995) to more than 100 today.[^1] The wide variety in their projected masses (sin(i)), orbital distances ($a$), and eccentricities continues to challenge theories of EGP birth, evolution, and abundance. However, as of this writing, only two EGPs (HD 209458b and OGLE-TR-56b) are claimed to transit their primaries and of the two HD 209458b is by far the best studied. The second transiting EGP, OGLE-TR-56b, has only recently been suggested as such (Konacki 2003) and, at a distance of $\sim$1500 parsecs, even if the detection is verified, its light curve and radial-velocity measurements are not yet competitive with those for HD 209458b. Since HD 209458’s stellar reflex motion has been accurately measured, and its transit light curve has been measured using HST/STIS to $\sim$100-[*micro*]{}magnitude precision (Brown 2001), it is an ideal testbed for the theory of irradiated EGPs, their evolution, structure, and atmospheres. The transit of the F8V/G0V star HD 209458 lasts $\sim$3 hours (out of a total period of 3.524738 days) and has an average photometric depth of $\sim$1.6% in the optical. Its ingress and egress phases each last $\sim$25 minutes (Henry 2000; Charbonneau 2000; Brown 2001). Using the complementary radial-velocity data (e.g., Henry 2000), good estimates for the planet’s mass, orbital distance, and orbital inclination are $\sim$0.69 , $\sim$0.045 AU, and $\sim$86$^{\circ}$, respectively. Such proximity makes HD 209458b the quintessential “roaster" (Sudarsky, Burrows, and Pinto 2000; Hubbard 2001; Sudarsky, Burrows, and Hubeny 2002). Of course, the depth of the transit light curve can be used to derive the planet’s radius (§\[data\]). It is the simultaneous availability of both a radius and a mass (together with an age estimate for the system from stellar evolution theory and a luminosity estimate for the star from its parallax) that makes this system especially useful to theorists. Moreover, Charbonneau (2002) have recently binned their HST/STIS data to derive a wavelength dependence for HD 209458b’s transit radius. In this way, they have inferred the presence of neutral sodium atoms (Seager and Sasselov 2000; Hubbard 2001) and, hence, have made the first measurement, however indirect, of the composition of the atmosphere of an extrasolar planet.
Importantly, the measured radius is a transit radius at a given wavelength, or range of wavelengths. It is not the canonical planetary radius at a “1-bar" pressure level (Lindal et al.1981; Hubbard et al. 2001). As such, the measured radius is the impact parameter of the transiting planet at which the optical depth to its primary’s light along a chord parallel to the star-planet line of centers is $\sim$1. This is not the optical depth in the radial direction, nor is it associated with the radius at the radiative-convective boundary. Hence, since the pressure level to which the transit beam is probing near the planet’s terminator is close to 1 [*milli*]{}bar (Fortney 2003), there are many pressure scale heights ($\sim$10) between the measured transit radius and both the radiative-convective boundary ($\ge$1000 bars) and the “1-bar" radius.[^2] Furthermore, exterior to the radiative-convective boundary, the entropy is an increasing function of radius. One consequence of this fact is significant radial inflation vis à vis a constant entropy atmosphere. The upshot of both these effects is an increase of $\sim$0.1 ($\sim$10%) in the theoretical radius.
Including the “thickness of the atmosphere" could change recent interpretations of the radius of HD 209458b. Guillot and Showman (2002), Baraffe et al. (2002,2003), and Bodenheimer et al. (2000,2003) all have difficulty fitting HD 209458b’s radius without an extra heat source. Guillot and Showman posit the dissipation at depth of mechanical energy generated by the stellar flux at altitude. Bodenheimer et al. invoke tidal heating or the presence of an additional planetary companion in near resonance to create the “Io" heating effect. However, we find that self-consistently calculating irradiated atmospheres and the irradiated planet’s structural and thermal evolution and assuming that the lower end of the range of the measured transit radius obtains, we can fit the observations without an extra source of heat. Our calculations also self-consistently and implicitly derive a Bond albedo, generally assumed by others as an input.
In §\[data\], we describe and discuss the measurements of HD 209458b’s transit radius. This is followed in §\[previous\] by a brief review of previous theoretical calculations of the radii of irradiated EGPs. In §\[approach\], we summarize the computational procedures we employ in this paper and discuss the various strengths and weaknesses of our approach and in §\[radius\] we present our theoretical results for the radius of HD 209458b, as well as its temporal evolution. This section contains the major conclusions of our study and includes in Fig. \[fig:2\] what we think is a favorable comparison between theory and measurement. We wrap up in §\[conclusion\] with general remarks and caveats.
The Measured Planetary Radius {#data}
=============================
Photometric light curve measurements of the relative transit depth of the HD 209458 system from both the ground (Henry 2000; Charbonneau 2000) and from space (HST/STIS: Brown 2001) have provided direct estimates of the ratio of the radii of the planet and star. Mandel and Agol (2002) conclude that this ratio can be obtained from the data to relatively high precision (/R$_{\ast}$ = 0.1207$\pm 0.0003$). Seager and Mallén-Ornelas (2003) suggest that future transit measurements alone, done with dense time sampling and the best photometric precision attainable from the ground, can yield the individual radii themselves. However, currently, estimates of the radius of the planet HD 209458b require estimates of the star’s radius and this requires both a fit to stellar evolution theory and a good parallax.[^3] As a result, ambiguities in the stellar radius translate into uncertainties in the inferred planetary radius. Mazeh (2000) conclude from $\log(g)$/ spectral-line fits and $M_{V}$/$(B-V)$ photometric fits that = $1.1\pm0.1$ , R$_{\ast}$ = $1.2\pm 0.1$ , $\sim$6000 K, \[Fe/H\]$\sim$0.0, and $t = 5.5\pm 1.5$ Gyr. From these data they derive a radius for HD 209458b of 1.40$\pm0.17$ , where the error bars are one-sigma and = $7.149 \times 10^9$ cm. Similarly, Cody and Sasselov (2002) derive R$_{\ast}$ = $1.18$ and = 1.06 , with one-sigma error bars of $\sim$10%. The resultant planetary radius is = 1.42$^{+0.10}_{-0.13}$ , where in this case the error bars in the planet radius do not include the errors in the stellar radius; Cody and Sasselov assume in deriving this estimate that the stellar radius is fixed at 1.18 . They also derive a best-fit age of $\sim$5.2 Gyrs ($\pm$10%), but second the age range quoted in Mazeh (2000).
Hence, to obtain a reliable stellar radius (given a parallax), one is obliged to derive the stellar metallicity, age, mass, and helium fraction simultaneously. This procedure perforce introduces ambiguities into the estimate of the planetary radius. In particular, if Cody and Sasselov were to use for the star’s radius a value of 1.10 (within their quoted errors), they would obtain a planetary radius of 1.32$^{+0.09}_{-0.11}$ . Hence, their one-sigma lower bound would be 1.21 . At = 1.18 , their one-sigma lower bound is 1.29 . Similar arguments can be marshalled in the context of the Brown (2001) and Mazeh (2000) planet radius estimates. As a result, it is not far-fetched to conclude that HD 209458b’s transit radius in the optical could be as small as $\sim$1.2 . While we are not completely convinced that this is the correct value, it is nevertheless useful to explore the theoretical consequences of such a possibility. Given an age range for the HD 209458 system and a radius range for the planet, theories for the irradiated planet’s evolutionary trajectory in age-radius space can be compared with observations to derive physical constraints on the nature of this irradiated planet and its atmosphere.
Previous Theories for the Radii of Irradiated Giant Planets {#previous}
===========================================================
The modern theory of the radii of irradiated EGPs begins with the paper of Guillot (1996). This paper focussed on 51 Pegasi b, but 1) predicted that irradiation due to proximity to a central primary would result in super-Jovian radii, 2) distinguished clearly between the radii of hydrogen-rich and metal-rich giants (in the tradition of Zapolsky and Salpeter 1969), and 3) suggested that lower-mass irradiated EGPs will be larger, all else being equal. However, these calculations were performed using an irradiation-modified version of atmospheric boundary conditions (needed for the evolutionary calculations) appropriate for isolated giants (Burrows et al. 1995; Burrows et al. 1997) and employed an ad hoc Bond albedo. The latter determines the absorption and heating efficiency of stellar light. A fully consistent spectrum and atmosphere calculation was not attempted. Hence, while the results were qualitatively valid, the actual radius-age trajectories obtained were ambiguous. In addition, very large radii (1.4-1.8 ) seemed plausible for older EGPs ($> 1$ Gyr).
In the first year of the HD 209458b campaign, Burrows (2000) employed similar boundary algorithms and Bond albedo ansatze to fit HD 209458b’s measured transit radius. They concluded that the planet could not be as large as measured unless it had migrated in early in its life before it had had time to cool and shrink appreciably. They showed that once an EGP achieves mere Jovian proportions it cannot be inflated enough to conform to the new transit radius measurements. While we concur with this general conclusion, we disagree with the magnitude of the discrepancy that late migration would have created. If, as we suggest in §\[data\], HD 209458b’s transit radius can be as small as $\sim$1.2 , we now find that the discrepancy in the radius would be $\sim$0.1 , not $\sim$0.3 , as implied in Burrows (2000). This is still significant, but less so. This modified conclusion is a consequence of our better and more consistent boundary conditions and the use of a state-of-the-art, frequency-dependent stellar atmosphere code that can accurately handle insolation (§\[approach\],§\[radius\]).
Recently, Guillot and Showman (2002), using a modified version of the Guillot (1996) boundary conditions, have questioned the larger radii derived in Guillot (1996) and Burrows (2000). They conclude that HD 209458b’s radius cannot be explained without an extra heat source and they speculate that this might be due to the degradation at depth of gravity waves generated in the upper atmosphere by a fraction of the stellar flux. However, in order to obtain boundary conditions for their new irradiated-planet evolutionary calculations (their “cold" case, without an extra heat source), they modify the atmospheric temperature/pressure profiles of isolated models (Burrows 1997) by shifting the temperature at 3 bars by a somewhat arbitrary 1000 Kelvin. They suggest that this procedure mimics the effect of the thick radiative zones of close-in EGPs, through which stellar light can not penetrate to heat the convective interior. While no attempt is made to construct self-consistent atmospheres that incorporate actual stellar and planetary spectra, this procedure does qualitatively capture the expected differences in T/P profiles between distant Jovian planets and nearby roasters at the same gravity and interior entropy. The result is an HD 209458b model with a radius no greater than $\sim$1.1 . Guillot and Showman (2002) have a discussion of the possible differences between day-side and night-side cooling (see §\[approach\]), but do not provide definitive quantitative guidance concerning this important, and still open, issue.
The results of Bodenheimer, Lin, and Mardling (2001) and Bodenheimer, Laughlin, and Lin (2003), who assume a Bond albedo and that the atmospheric temperature at $\tau_{Rosseland} = 2/3$ is equal to , are quantitatively similar to those of Guillot and Showman (2002) and they explore the possible effects of heating by tidal circularization and forcing by a second planet or of the explicit presence or absence of a heavy-element core. However, recently, in parallel with the present work, Baraffe (2002,2003) have begun to incorporate more realistic atmospheric boundary conditions into HD 209458b studies using a frequency-dependent atmosphere code. Nevertheless, they too obtain smaller radii than found in the Guillot (1996) and Burrows (2000) studies and, as a consequence, also evoke an another source of heat to explain the measured transit radius.
It is the thesis of this paper that a combination of the proper interpretation of the transit radius (§\[intro\]) and a lower measured value of that radius (still within the error bars, §\[data\]) can be shown to be in accord with consistent and frequency-dependent atmosphere and evolutionary calculations, without an additional source of heat. These calculations do not use an ad hoc Bond albedo and do use a realistic G0 V irradiation spectrum. However, the completeness of our theory as an explanation for HD 209458b’s transit radius hinges upon the assumption that the true radius resides at the lower end of its measured range. We now turn to a description of our computational procedures.
Computational Methods and Assumptions {#approach}
=====================================
At the low effective temperatures achieved by brown dwarfs and EGPs, boundary conditions for evolutionary calculations must incorporate realistic atmospheres (Burrows 1997; Allard 1997). The traditional method of setting the effective temperature equal to the temperature at a Rosseland mean optical depth of $2/3$ does not really provide the T/P profile in the atmosphere and can lead to errors in of hundreds of Kelvin. Hence, for isolated objects with cold molecular atmospheres, we calculate a grid of detailed T/P profiles and spectra at various and gravities ($g$). These atmospheres penetrate deeply into the convective core. In this way, we determine the relationship between the core entropy ($S$), , and $g$ (Hubbard 1977). Since the core contains the mass and the heat, while the thin atmosphere is the valve that regulates radiative losses, interpolating in this pre-calculated $S$- grid at each timestep in an evolutionary calculation assures accuracy and self-consistency.
However, when an EGP is being irradiated by a primary star, the above procedure must be modified to include the outer stellar flux in the spectrum/atmosphere calculation that yields the corresponding $S$- relationship. This must be done for a given external stellar flux and spectrum, which in turn depends upon the stellar luminosity spectrum and the orbital distance of the EGP. Therefore, we use the Discontinuous Finite Element (DFE) variant of the spectral code TLUSTY (Hubeny 1988; Hubeny and Lanz 1995) that we have developed for EGP and brown dwarf atmospheres (Sudarsky, Burrows, and Hubeny 2002) to calculate a new $S$- grid under the irradiation regime of HD 209458b. This grid is tailor-made for the luminosity and spectrum of HD 209458 at a distance of 0.045 AU. For the stellar spectrum, we employ a theoretical G0 V spectrum of Kurucz (1994) and we assume that the orbital distance, stellar luminosity, and stellar spectrum are all constant during the EGP’s evolution. (Hence, we ignore the “faint young sun" problem.)
The procedure is straightforward. For a given inner flux boundary condition (represented by , where $\sigma {\rm T}^4_{\rm eff}$ is the interior core flux of the EGP) and a given gravity $g$, we calculate the atmospheric T/P profile, including the irradiation. Using mixing-length theory, the atmosphere is continued deep into the convective region. The radiative-convective boundary may be at pressures of $\sim$10 bars (for younger ages) to $\sim$4000 bars (for older ages). The entropy of the core ($S$) is now known for a given interior heat flux (parametrized by ) and gravity ($g$). After the table in $S$, (internal flux), and $g$ is generated, it is inverted to obtain the more useful relationship ($S$,$g$) for the interior flux. This is the function used to advance the evolutionary calculations for HD 209458b, using a state-of-the-art equation of state (Saumon, Chabrier, and Van Horn 1995) and evolutionary code (Burrows 1997). Note that since an EGP core is convective the radius of the radiative-convective boundary for a given mass EGP (e.g., 0.69 ) is a function of $S$ and $g$ alone. Implicit in this procedure is an albedo, which therefore does not have to be assumed, as well as an emergent planetary spectrum and a T/P profile to pressures below a microbar. Since we calculate the atmospheric profile, we can automatically include the multiple-scale-height effect described in §\[intro\] in our calculation of the transit radius.
We have explored the effects on the resultant EGP transit radius of variations in the helium fraction (Y$_{He}$), of the presence or absence of clouds in the upper atmosphere (Sudarsky, Burrows, and Hubeny 2002), of the possible presence of a rocky core, and of changes in the opacities in the deep atmosphere (e.g., due to the presence or absence of TiO/VO). Note with the latter that our motivation for varying the opacities in this manner is not to suggest that TiO or VO may not be present (we certainly think they are), but to explore thereby the dependence on the radius evolution of large changes in the opacities at depth. Increasing Y$_{He}$ from 0.25 or 0.28 to 0.30 can mimic the effect of a metal-rich “rock" core or envelope and slightly shrink the object (Zapolsky and Salpeter 1969; Guillot and Showman 2002). For instance, we have calculated that for an EGP with a mass of 0.69 replacing a one-Earth-mass heavy-element core by one containing 11 Earth masses can shrink the planet’s radius by 3-4%. This amounts to approximately -350 kilometers per Earth mass. An increase in the core mass by 10 Earth masses is comparable to the effect of increasing Y$_{He}$ by $\sim$0.02 units. The models plotted in Figs. \[fig:1\] and \[fig:2\] do not incorporate a rocky core, though some of the models assume a high Y$_{He}$ to mimic its presence. However, there are two major issues that in the final analysis will need to be addressed in detail before a definitive answer is derived. For the time being, they must be finessed and have been finessed in all previous theoretical studies. The first is the fact that the planet is spherical, while the insolating stellar flux is a bundle of parallel beams. This results in a flux whose angle of incidence is a function of latitude. At the sub-stellar point the flux is a maximum, while it decreases as the terminator is approached. We have introduced the flux parameter $f$ which accounts in approximate fashion for the variation in incident flux with latitude when using a planar atmosphere code such as we employ. Hence, a value of $f = 1/2$ is a reasonable average and is our baseline value, but we have explored the consequences of the bounding values $f =1.0$ (appropriate for the sub-stellar point) and $f= 1/4$.
The second major issue is the day-night cooling difference. The gravity and interior entropy are the same for the day and the night sides of HD 209458b. For a sychronously rotating planet such as HD 209458b, the higher core entropies needed to explain a large measured radius imply higher internal fluxes on a night side if the day and the night atmospheres are not coupled (Guillot and Showman 2002). As described in Burrows (2000), the day side core flux is quite suppressed by the flattening of the temperature gradient and the thickening of the radiative zone due to irradiation. However, Showman and Guillot (2002), Menou (2002), and Cho (2003) have recently demonstrated that strong atmospheric circulation currents that advect heat from the day to the night side at a wide range of pressure levels are expected in HD 209458b. Showman and Guillot (2002) estimate that below pressures of $\sim$1 bar the night-side cooling of the air can be quicker than the time it takes the winds to traverse the night side, but that at higher pressures the cooling timescale is far longer. Importantly, the radiative-convective boundary in HD 209458b is deep in the planet, at pressures above 1000 bars. We take this to mean that due to the coupling of the day and the night sides via strong winds at depth, the temperature-pressure profiles at the convective boundary on both sides are similar (A. Showman, private communication). This implies that HD 209458b’s core cooling rate is roughly the same in both hemispheres. This is similar to the case of Jupiter, where the interior flux is latitude- and longitude-independent, despite solar irradiation. Clearly, a full three-dimensional radiation/hydrodynamic study or Global-Climate-Model (GCM) is necessary to resolve this thorny issue definitively, but in the interim we assume in this paper that the interiors on the day and night sides cool at the same rate.
In calculating our T/P profiles, we assume a constant $g$. Since $g$ in fact decreases slightly from the bottom to the top of HD 209458b’s extended atmosphere, the thicknesses of our calculated atmospheres are slightly underestimated. Furthermore, winds carrying gas from the day side to the night side (and vice versa) should experience temperature changes at altitude that might alter the composition and cloud profiles. Since a transit observation probes the day-night terminator, such variations could affect the character of the transit itself. However, for this study, we ignore this potential complication. We use the opacity library described in Sudarsky, Burrows, and Hubeny (2002) and 5000 frequency points from 0.4 to 300 in calculating the T/P profiles.
Results: R$_p$ versus Age {#radius}
=========================
Figure \[fig:1\] portrays temperature-pressure profiles at various ages along the solid model trajectory plotted in Fig. \[fig:2\] with $f =0.5$, Y$_{He}$ = 0.30, and without TiO/VO opacities. We plot the T/P profiles for this model only as one example among many. The positions of the radiative-convective boundaries are indicated with large dots and each profile is for a specific time (and ) during the evolution. The pronounced inflection in the curves is predominantly a result of the near balance at some depth between countervailing incident and internal fluxes, but changes in the opacity profiles also play a role. Nevertheless, such inflections are generic features of consistent calculations of irradiated atmospheres and affect the mapping between , $S$, and $g$ used in evolutionary calculations. As is indicated on Fig. \[fig:1\], the for this model at 7.5 Gyr is near $\sim$62 K, which implies a $\sim$65% lower internal flux than obtained for the isolated ([**I**]{}) model. For the isolated model at 7.5 Gyr, is $\sim$82 K. The large contrast between these low and the high atmospheric temperatures (1000-2000 K) seen in Fig. \[fig:1\] for an irradiated object may seem counterintuitive, until one realizes that is the interior “flux temperature" from which the core luminosity is derived. Evolution over time and the stanching of heat loss by the hot atmospheric thermal blanket result in flux temperatures for irradiated objects that are smaller than, but of the same order as, those for isolated or orbitally distant EGPs (Burrows et al. 2000).
Figure \[fig:2\] compares the transit radius data summarized in §\[data\] with various representative radius-age trajectories calculated in this paper. The theoretical ages start at 10$^8$ years and the radii are in Jovian units (1 $\equiv$ 7.149$\times 10^4$ km). As described in §\[intro\], the radius at the 1.0 millibar level is taken to be the relevant radius (Fortney 2003). In this way, the thickness of the atmosphere, which thereby contributes 0.08 to 0.13 to the total radius, is incorporated into the theoretical numbers. The 1-$\sigma$ radius ranges inferred by Mazeh (2000, red), Brown (2001, green), and Cody and Sasselov (2002, gold) are plotted; for all observational estimates the age is assumed to be bracketed by 4 and 7 Gyr. For the Cody and Sasselov (2002) data, two boxes, one assuming a stellar radius of 1.18 (solid gold) and the other assuming a stellar radius of 1.1 (dashed gold), are provided. The red curve adjacent to an [**I**]{} is the corresponding trajectory for an isolated EGP with a helium fraction of 0.28. As one can clearly see, the difference between the [**I**]{} trajectory and the irradiated trajectories is approximately $\sim$0.2 .
The theoretical irradiated trajectories are all shown in Fig. \[fig:2\] in blue. The solid curve is for $f =0.5$, Y$_{He}$ = 0.30, does not include TiO and VO at depth, and does not have clouds (see Fig. \[fig:1\]). The short dashed curve is similar, but includes both TiO/VO at depth and a forsterite cloud at altitude (Fortney 2003). The dotted curve is for $f = 1.0$, but otherwise has the same parameters as the solid curve, and the long-dashed curve has no TiO or VO at depth, no cloud, and a helium fraction of 0.25. The presence or absence of TiO/VO is meant to gauge the effect of significant changes in opacity at higher pressures and temperatures. We see that the effect of altering this opacity, while discernable, is not large. This representative model set illustrates and quantifies several clear systematic trends. The first is that the radius is a decreasing function of increasing Y$_{He}$ (or metallicity). A larger Y$_{He}$ might mimic the effect of a rocky core (Guillot and Showman 2002). The second is that a larger $f$ yields a larger radius. Intense irradiation inflates the atmosphere and at a given epoch results in interiors with slightly higher entropies. The third is that the extra opacity effect of a cloud seems to decrease the radius. However, this last trend is actually a bit misleading, since the presence of a cloud also puts the transit radius at lower pressure levels, thereby increasing the measured radius. The two effects roughly cancel. For none of the models shown is there an extra source of heating power. The finite thickness of the atmosphere and the low pressure level of the actual transit radius account for $\sim$0.1 of our theoretical radii and are the major reasons we differ from the theories of Guillot and Showman (2002), Bodenheimer, Lin, and Mardling (2001), and Bodenheimer, Laughlin, and Lin (2003). Baraffe et al. (2003) do account for the finite thickness of the atmosphere, but their estimated thickness is about half the thickness that we obtain here. Moreover, details of the atmospheric boundary condition govern the core entropy, and, hence, the overall size of the planet. This dependence can also lead to dispersion in theoretical estimates of the planet’s size.
The general proximity of the sheaf of models on Fig. \[fig:2\] to the 1-$\sigma$ lower bounds of the measured radius is what motivates us to suggest that an additional heat source may not be necessary to explain the HD 209458b radius measurements. However, the effective Y$_{He}$ or $f$ and the role of day-night thermal coupling by winds are not yet sufficiently well constrained to pinpoint the theoretical radius of the 0.69-EGP, HD 209459b, to better than $\sim$0.05-0.1 . Note that we obtain a theoretical upper bound to the transit radius of HD 209458b at 4.0 Gyr of $\sim$1.3 if Y$_{He}$ = 0.25, $f$=1.0, there is no rocky core, and the TiO/VO opacity is suppressed. Radii greater than this for HD 209458b will be difficult to explain without significant alterations in the physics or chemistry and/or without an extra source of internal power.
Conclusions {#conclusion}
===========
We have calculated consistent T/P profiles for various models of an irradiated HD 209458b. These profiles penetrate deeply into its inner convective zone and have been used to derive realistic boundary conditions for evolutionary models of its transit radius. The latter has been pegged to the $\sim$1-millibar pressure level inferred in the work of Fortney (2003) and Hubbard (2001) and accounts for $\sim$10% of the total radius. We find that irradiation and the proper interpretation of the measured radius as the transit radius alone can explain HD 209458b’s observed radius, without invoking an additional source of heating, if its true transit radius is at the lower end of the measured range.
Major caveats and uncertainties remain and include the actual effect of heat transport by winds from the day to the night sides, the possible presence of a rocky core, the actual helium fraction, and the true effective insolation parameter $f$. To resolve most of these issues will require multi-dimensional modeling with realistic radiative/convective transport. If the actual helium fraction is greater than $\sim$0.28, then a rocky core much larger than $\sim$15 Earth masses may be difficult to accommodate. If better measurements of the transit radius indeed yield large radii for HD 209458b at or above $\sim$1.40 , then our interpretation is not tenable. However, if radii closer to the current lower error bars are proven to obtain, we would conclude that the theory of the structure of irradiated EGPs is in hand and well poised to interpret the new transiting EGPs anticipated to be discovered in the next few years.
Curiously, the preliminary radius for OGLE-TR-56b obtained by Konacki 2003) is only $1.3\pm$0.15 , despite its extreme proximity ($\sim$0.023 AU) to its central sun-like star. Having a mass ($\sim$0.9 ) similar to that of HD209458b ($\sim$0.69 ), one might have expected the radius of HD209459b (at an orbital ditance of $\sim$0.045 AU) to have been smaller, not larger, than that of OGLE-TR-56b. This could suggest that our theory for irradiated EGPs is basically correct, and that additional heat sources are not the norm, but that the transit radius of HD209458b is anomalously large, perhaps because of the special circumstance of a companion (as suggested by Bodenheimer et al.). With a collection of transits, supplemented with good radial-velocity data, and a family of radius-mass pairs for different irradiation regimes, we will be able to check this hypothesis, as well as our general theory for irradiated planet transit radii. Such a family will be a major boon to the emerging study of extrasolar giant planets.
We would like to thank Ivan Hubeny, Dimitar Sasselov, Adam Showman, Jonathan Lunine, Drew Milsom, Jonathan Fortney, Curtis Cooper, and Christopher Sharp for insightful discussions during the course of this work. This work was supported in part by NASA grants NAG5-10760 and NAG5-10629.
Allard, F., Hauschildt, P. H., Alexander, D. R. & Starrfield, S. 1997, , 35, 137
Baraffe, I. 2002, to be published in “Scientific Frontiers in Research on Extrasolar Planets," ASP Conf. Series vol. 28, eds. D. Deming and S. Seager.
Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Barman, T.S., Allard, F., and Hauschildt, P.H. 2003, Astron. Astrophys. 402, 701
Barman, T.S., Hauschildt, P.H., Schweitzer, A., Stancil, P.C., Baron, E., and Allard, F. 2002, , 569, L51
Bodenheimer, P., Lin, D.N.C., Mardling, R.A. 2001, , 548, 466
Bodenheimer, P., Laughlin, G., and Lin, D.N.C. 2003, astro-ph/0303541
Brown, T. M., Charbonneau, D., Gilliland, R.L., Noyes, R.W., and Burrows, A. 2001, , 552, 699
Burrows, A., Saumon, D., Guillot, T., Hubbard, W.B., & Lunine, J.I. 1995, Nature, 375, 299
Burrows, A., Marley, M., Hubbard, W. B., Lunine, J. I., Guillot, T., Saumon, D., Freedman, R., Sudarsky, D., & Sharp, C. 1997, , 491, 856
Burrows, A., Guillot, T., Hubbard, W. B., Marley, M. S., Saumon, D., Lunine, J. I., & Sudarsky, D. 2000, 534, 97
Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., & Mayor, M. 2000, , 529, L45
Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Noyes, R. W., & Gilliland, R. L. 2002, , 568, 377
Cho, J. Y-K., Menou, K., Hansen, B. M. S., & Seager, S. 2003, , 587, L113
Cody, A. M. & Sasselov, D. D. 2002, , 569, 451
Fortney, J.J., Sudarsky, D., Hubeny, I., Cooper, C.S., Hubbard, W.B., Burrows, A., and Lunine, J.I. 2003, accepted to
Goukenleuque, C., Bezard, B., Joguet, B., Lellouch, E., & Freedman, R. 2000, Icarus, 143, 308
Guillot, T., Burrows, A., Hubbard, W. B., Lunine, J. I., & Saumon, D. 1996, , 459, 35
Guillot, T. & Showman, A. P. 2002, , 385, 156
Henry, G., Marcy, G. W., Butler, R. P., & Vogt, S. S. 2000, , 529, L41
Hubbard, W.B. 1977, Icarus, 30, 305
Hubbard, W. B., Fortney, J. F., Lunine, J. I., Burrows, A., Sudarsky, D., & Pinto, P. A. 2001, , 560, 413
Hubeny, I. 1988, Computer Physics Comm., 52, 103
Hubeny, I. and Lanz, T. 1995, , 439, 875
Konacki, M., Torres, G., Jha, S., and Sasselov, D. 2003, Nature, 421, 507
Kurucz, R. 1994, [*Kurucz CD-ROM No. 19*]{}, (Cambridge: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory)
Lindal, G. F., Wood, G. E., Levy, G. S., Anderson, J. D., Sweetnam, D. N., Hotz, H. B., Buckles, B. J., Holmes, D. P., Doms, P. E., Eshleman, V. R., Tyler, G. L., and Croft, T. A. 1981, , 86, 8721 Mandel, K. and Agol, E. 2002, , 580, L171
Marley, M. S., Gelino, C., Stephens, D., Lunine J. I., & Freedman, R. 1999, , 513, L879
Mayor, M. & Queloz, D. 1995, Nature, 378, 355
Mazeh, T., Naef, D., Torres, G., 2000, , 532, L55
Menou, K, Cho, J. Y-K., Hansen, B. M. S., & Seager, S. 2002, astro-ph/0210499
Perryman, M.A.C. 1997, The [*Hipparcos*]{} and [*Tycho*]{} Catalogues (ESA SP-1200, Noordwijk:ESA)
Saumon, D., Chabrier, G., and Van Horn, H. 1995, , 99, 713
Seager, S. & Sasselov, D. D. 2000, , 537, 916
Seager, S. and Mallén-Ornelas, G. 2003, , 585, 1038
Showman, A. P. & Guillot, T. 2002, , 385, 166
Sudarsky, D., Burrows, A., & Pinto, P. 2000, , 538, 885
Sudarsky, D., Burrows, A., and Hubeny, I. 2003, accepted to
Zapolsky, H.S. and Salpeter, E.E. 1969, , 158, 809
[^1]: see J. Schneider’s Extrasolar Planet Encyclopaedia at http://www.obspm.fr/encycl/encycl.html for an current tally, with ancillary stellar data.
[^2]: If, as implied in Barman et al. (2002), the transit radius is at pressures well below the 1 millibar level then the multiple-pressure-scale-height effect we identify here would be even larger.
[^3]: The Hipparcos distance to the star HD 209458 is 47.3 parsecs, with an error of $\sim$5% (Perryman 1997).
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
author:
- 'T. Khanzadyan'
- 'C. J. Davis'
- 'C. Aspin'
- 'D. Froebrich'
- 'M. D. Smith'
- 'T. Yu. Magakian'
- 'T. Movsessian'
- 'G. H. Moriarty-Schieven'
- 'E. H. Nikogossian'
- 'T.-S. Pyo'
- 'T. L. Beck'
bibliography:
- 'main-library.bib'
date: 'Received ; accepted '
title: 'A Wide-Field Near-Ir H$_2$ 2.122$\mu$m line survey of the Braid Nebula Star Formation Region in Cygnus OB7'
---
[Outflows and jets are the first signposts of ongoing star formation processes in any molecular cloud, yet their study in optical bands provides limited results due to the large extinction present. Near-infrared unbiased wide-field observations in the H$_2$ 1-0 S(1) line at 2.122$\mu$m alleviates the problem, enabling us to detect more outflows and trace them closer to their driving sources.]{} [As part of a large-scale multi-waveband study of ongoing star formation in the Braid Nebula Star Formation region, we focus on a one square degree region that includes Lynds Dark Nebula1003 and 1004. Our goal is to find all of the near-infrared outflows, uncover their driving sources and estimate their evolutionary phase.]{} [We use near-infrared wide-field observations obtained with WFCAM on UKIRT, in conjunction with previously-published optical and archival MM data, to search for outflows and identify their driving sources; we subsequently use colour-colour analysis to determine the evolutionary phase of each source.]{} [Within a one square degree field we have identified 37 complex MHOs, most of which are new. After combining our findings with other wide-field, multi-waveband observations of the same region we were able to discern 28 outflows and at least 18 protostars. Our analysis suggests that these protostars are younger and/or more energetic than those of the Taurus-Auriga region. The outflow data enable us to suggest connection between outflow ejection and repetitive FUOri outburst events. We also find that star formation progresses from W to E across the investigated region.]{}
Introduction
============
This work is part of a multi-waveband and wide-field observational campaign to study the Braid Nebula Star Formation region [@aspin:2009], which is situated in the outskirts of CygnusOB7. The region is part of a dark and extended ($\sim$7$\times$10 in size) filamentary complex known as Kh141 [@khavtassi:1960], or [@dobashi:2005]. It is sometimes called “The Northern Coalsack” and contains numerous individually identified Lynds clouds [@lynds:1962]. The Braid Nebula Star Formation region, defined by the and clouds, extends over a degree field and encompasses one of the highest visual extinction regions in the Kh141 complex.
There have been several estimates of the distance to CygnusOB7: @hiltner:1956 and @schmidt:1958 derived a distance of 740pc. A similar value was suggested by @de-zeeuw:1999 using data from the *Hipparcos* Catalogue (although their results were inconclusive due to the fact that there is a giant molecular cloud complex [e.g. @dame:2001] at a distances of 500 to 1000pc which hampers optical population studies towards the Cygnus region). An alternative approach has been implied by @pluschke:2002 using the radioactive decay of $^{26}$Al at 1.809 MeV together with the population synthesis of the OB association members and Wolf-Rayet stars in the region. Their analysis suggests a distance of 800$\pm$10pc for the CygnusOB7 association, which agrees well with the earlier measurements and will therefore be assumed in our work.
{width="18cm"}
The first study of the LDN1003 molecular cloud dates back to the discovery of a red nebulous object by @cohen:1980 which eventually turned out to be a Herbig-Haro () object [@melikian:2001]. Later studies of the region uncovered numerous H$\alpha$ stars [@melikian:2001], optical and near-infrared HH objects and reflection nebulae [@movsessian:2003], one of which – the Braid Nebula – was found to be associated with an FU Orionis (FU Ori) type eruptive variable star [@movsessian:2006].
Some 30$\arcmin$ west of RNO127, @devine:1997 found several HH objects, two of which were associated with the bipolar reflection nebula created by HH381IRS (). This particular object did not receive attention until @reipurth:1997 studied it spectroscopically and found that it has many of the characteristics of an FU Ori type star. Further spectroscopic observations supported this interpretation [@greene:2008] and a subsequent comparison of archival optical data from DSS-1 (1953) and DSS-2 (1990) with more recent CCD images demonstrated that HH381IRS had brightened considerably over the last few decades. The presence of two FU Ori type outburst stars in LDN1003, along with numerous IRAS sources [@movsessian:2003], points to significant star formation activity in this area. A follow-up unbiased, wide-field and multi-waveband study of the region was warranted; this is a project that our consortium is currently conducting.
The first stage in our exploration of the region was a near-infrared spectroscopic study of the most significant sources and nebulae [@aspin:2009], where we confirmed the FU Ori nature of both the Braid Nebula Star and HH381IRS and characterised all of the observed 16 sources. Next we presented a wide-field narrowband optical survey of the region [@magakian:2010], where we reported the discovery of 25 more HH objects and 12 individual outflows. The unbiased nature of the survey also enabled us to detect many reflection nebulae. In order to relate the detected outflows with the driving sources hidden behind the extended diffuse cloud filaments in LDN1003 and 1004 we observed the region in CSO 1.1mm continuum [@aspin:2011]. Our study revealed 55 cold dust clumps, some of which (20%) coincide with IRAS sources found in the region, the rest being starless. We also found that both FU Ori objects are associated with strong millimetre emission.
In this paper we present our wide-field near-infrared H$_2$ 1-0 S(1) (2.122$\mu$m) line observations of the entire 1 square degree field centred on the Braid Nebula. Our goal is to trace the outflows and jets emanating from the protostars. Due to the significant extinction present in the region it is difficult to relate outflows detected in the optical with candidate driving sources. The influence of extinction is significantly lower in the near-infrared, which enables us to detect more outflow features. By using H$_2$ 2.122$\mu$m emission as a tracer of jets and outflows, wide-field narrow-band images may be used to pin-point the locations of the driving sources. Moreover, they allow us to take a statistical approach when considering questions about the distribution of Class 0/I protostars and Class II/III Young Stellar Objects (YSOs), the interaction of these forming stars with their surrounding environment, the overall star formation efficiency, and the evolution of the region as a whole [e.g. @stanke:2002; @davis:2007; @davis:2009; @kumar:2011].
In this paper Section\[sec:obsred\] describes the observations and data reduction, while Section\[sec:results\] explains our results with an emphasis on the multi-waveband data used in our work. In Section\[sec:discussion\] we discuss the outflows and their driving sources within the broader prospective of the entire region and use features within the outflows of the two FUOri outburst stars to trace their evolution. We also search for gradients in star formation across the region. Lastly, in Section\[sec:summary\] we summarise our findings and present our main conclusions.
Observations and data reduction {#sec:obsred}
===============================
WFCAM data
----------
Wide-field near-infrared images of the Braid Nebula region were obtained in July 2006, at the United Kingdom Infrared Telescope (UKIRT[^1]). The Wide-Field Camera (WFCAM) [@casali:2007] was used with a narrow-band H$_2$ 1-0 S(1) and broad-band J, H and K filters [see @hewett:2006 for the filter descriptions].
WFCAM houses four Teledyne HAWAII-2 2048$\times$2048 HgCdTe detectors, each with a pixel scale of 0.4 that are spaced by 94% in the focal plane. To achieve full coverage of a 54$\times$ 54 area on the sky, four telescope pointings were used with a five-point jitter pattern (6.4 spacing) at each pointing to account for detector artefacts. To fully sample the seeing, at each jitter position an additional 2$\times$2 micro-stepped pattern was used, shifting the array by N+1/2 pixels between each micro-step position. In the reduced images the pixel scale is therefore 0.2. Integration times of 20 minutes and 40 minutes were reached in the broad-band and narrow-band filters, respectively.
The raw images were pipeline processed by the Cambridge Astronomical Survey Unit (CASU). The data reduction steps are described in detail by @dye:2006. All reduced WFCAM data are archived at the WFCAM Science Archive (WSA[^2]). Pipeline processed data were visually inspected so that residual non-uniform surface brightness variations could be removed before mosaics were constructed using the World Co-ordinate System (WCS) embedded in the headers.
The final mosaics were inspected and found to be free of any significant artefacts. Small, ring-like cross-talk features a few pixels in diameter were evident in the data adjacent to bright and saturated stars. These artefacts appear 8 and 16 pixels from each bright stars along rows and columns and were therefore easily identified and discarded during the several steps taken to detect real H$_2$ 1-0 S(1) line features.
To identify line-emission features: **(1)** we used J, K and H$_2$ images of the same field to create a false colour RGB image in which H$_2$ features appear extremely red in colour; the cross-talk features stand-out due to their relative faintness in H$_2$. **(2)** we extracted image sections and produced continuum-subtracted data by subtracting the scaled K band images from the narrow-band H$_2$ images; compact knots remain at the locations of field stars due to imperfect subtraction, though these are easily distinguished from pure H$_2$ line-emission features, which are typically diffuse and/or extended. **(3)** each pair of H$_2$ and K band image sections were blinked together to confirm the validity of each new H$_2$ feature detection.
Supplementary and Archival data
-------------------------------
In our analysis of the Braid Nebula region we compared near-infrared H$_2$ 1-0 S(1) line data with optical H$\alpha$, \[SII\] and CSO 1.1mm observations that were presented and thoroughly described in @magakian:2010 and @aspin:2011, respectively. We have also used IRAS HiRes[^3] processed data of the region.
For mid-infrared coverage AKARI/IRC data were obtained from *The AKARI/IRC mid-infrared all-sky survey* catalogue [@ishihara:2010] where fluxes in Jy are presented for the S9W ($\lambda$ = 9$\mu$m) and L18W ($\lambda$ = 18$\mu$m) bands. We used @tanabe:2008a ZP flux densities of 56.262 and 12.001 Jy for S9W and L18W bands, respectively, to calculate the appropriate magnitudes. These are presented in the Table\[tab:photom\]. Only high quality fluxes (quality flag 3) in S9W and L18W were used in our subsequent analysis of the sources in the Braid Nebula region.
The 2MASS and AKARI/IRC catalogues for the entire region were cross-correlated using a positional uncertainty of 3$\arcsec$. In this way we were able to obtain photometry in multiple bands for a near-complete population of sources in the field.
![An H$_2$ + continuum image of the V2494Cyg outflow is presented in the **right, wide-field** panel. Here the diamonds and crosses indicate the positions of MHO and HH objects, respectively. The solid-line box marks the area around MHO 901 and the V2494Cyg nebula that is shown in more detail **top-left**. In this panel the grey-scale contours mark the CSO 1.1mm data with values 40, 60, 80, 100, 140 and 180 mJy; the hashed numbers label the designated CSO cores from @aspin:2011; the dashed-line circle shows the approximate extent of the IRAS HiRes 25$\mu$m cores; the dashed-line and solid-line arrows show the suspected and confirmed outflows, respectively. The **bottom-left panel** shows a magnified view of V2494Cyg in H$\alpha$ [@magakian:2010] in which the HH381jet can be seen.[]{data-label="fig:v2494cygwide"}](v2494cyg.jpg){width="8.5cm"}
Results {#sec:results}
=======
Figure\[fig:field-overview\] shows the overall extent of the Braid Nebula star formation region at optical and near-infrared wavelengths. Several known dark clouds (LDN 1003 and 1004) and bright stars, as well as the Braid Nebula and (also known as HH 381 IRS) are marked. Our analysis of the entire one-square-degree field reveales numerous outflow features in addition to our previous study of the region [@movsessian:2003]. The details of the individual **M**olecular **H**ydrogen emission-line **O**bjects (MHO[^4]) identified in the region are presented in the Appendix\[sec:indmho\] and \[sec:mhodetails\].
For better identification of the protostars and the outflow driving sources in our surveyed region it is essential to probe the region at mid-infrared wavelengths. The various photometric bands of the *Spitzer*/IRAC instrument (between 3 and 25$\mu$m) are particularly sensitive to the young stellar content [@evans:2009]. Unfortunately, at the time of writing, there were no *Spitzer* observations covering or neighbouring our field of study. This prevents us from making a detailed statistical and evolutionary study. We have therefore used mid-infrared fluxes from the AKARI/IRC catalogue. With these data we were are able to *probe* the young stellar nature of the objects situated in the entire surveyed region.
To aid in our quest to identify outflow driving sources we firstly cross-correlate the available multi-waveband data for suspected candidates following the example of @aspin:2009. These sources are presented in the Appendix\[sec:multisource\]. Some of the candidates were already suggested as being young and active, based on their proximity to HH objects [@devine:1997; @magakian:2010] and their observed spectra [@aspin:2009]. In this study, armed with the locations of newly-identified near-infrared MHOs, in conjunction with the positions of recently-reported HH objects [@magakian:2010] and CSO 1.1mm cores [@aspin:2011], we are likewise able to associate young stars with the outflows they power. Figure\[fig:v2494cygwide\] shows one example, where we confirm the 7pc bipolar outflow recently reported by @magakian:2010 and are able to suggest an extension to this flow (MHO900 and 904), making it over 10pc long and one of the most significant outflows detected in the current region. The fact that this outflow is powered by an FUOri type eruptive variable star [@aspin:2009; @kazarovets:2011] highlights the importance of this find. Fig.\[fig:v2494cygwide\] also shows the importance of using multi-waveband data; in this case, by using IRAS 25$\mu$m band data we are able to identify the source of the HH965 optical outflow [@magakian:2010].
![Similar to Fig.\[fig:v2494cygwide\] but for the region around Cyg19 H$\alpha$ star where MHO 912, 915, 918 and 922 were detected.[]{data-label="fig:cyg19"}](cyg19region.jpg){width="8.5cm"}
Figure\[fig:cyg19\] reveals yet another parsec-scale outflow (MHO912 - 922) newly detected in near-infrared H$_2$ 1-0 S(1) emission. There are three CSO 1.1mm cores in this sub-field (\#7, \#14 and \#20). Two seem to be associated with outflows: MHO 912-922 and MHO918. Surprisingly, the brightest and most compact core (\#14) is not obviously associated with an MHO or HH outflow. Core \#7 is possibly associated with the H$\alpha$ emission-line star Cyg19 [@melikian:1996], which we identify as the driving source of this bipolar outflow.
![Similar to Fig.\[fig:v2494cygwide\] but for the region around the Braid Nebula where numerous HHs and MHOs were detected. Solid-line and dashed-line arrows show confirmed and suspected outflows, respectively. Cometary Nebulae (CN) reported by @magakian:2010 are marked for reference.[]{data-label="fig:braid"}](braidregion.jpg){width="8.5cm"}
[lccccc]{} Driving & Outflow & & P.A. & $L_{2.12}$\
Source & Components & & (degs) & $\times 10^{-3}L_{\sun}$\
Z20566+5213 & HH 695NE knot+bow, HH 965SW knot+bow & 0.35 & 0.33 & 47$\pm$5 & …\
V2494 Cyg & MHO 900, HH 967, HH 966, HH 381jet, MHO 901, MHO 902, MHO 904 & 4.67 & 5.60 & 174$\pm$5 & 28.77\
I20575+5221 & MHO 906A, B and C, HH 968 & 1.06 & 0.35 & 38$\pm$5 & 9.17\
core \#44 & MHO 907, MHO 909, MHO 910 & 0.70 & 0.70 & 10$\pm$5 & 59.11\
I20575+5210 & MHO 908, HH 974, MHO 903 & 0.23 & 0.69 & 95$\pm$5 & 61.63\
I20575+5210 & HH 971, HH 972, HH 973 & 0.56 & 0.29 & 0$\pm$5 & …\
CN6 (core \#51) & MHO 911 (HH 627A) & 0.21 & … & 140$\pm$5 & 28.32\
R20582+5221 & HH 627C, HH 627D & 0.19 & … & 228$\pm$5 & …\
I20583+5228 & MHO 913A, B and C & 0.10 & 0.10 & 150$\pm$5 & 7.14\
CN3N & HH 628 & 0.48 & … & 165$\pm$5 & …\
Cyg19 & MHO 912, MHO 915, MHO 922 & 1.02 & 1.27 & 54$\pm$5 & 109.19\
CN2 & MHO 917, HH 630A & 0.26 & 0.14 & 129$\pm$5 & 3.28\
IRAS 15N & MHO 914, HH 976knot, MHO 923C and D & 0.55 & 0.83 & 30$\pm$5 & 56.28\
I20588+5221 & MHO 918 & 0.29 & … & 252$\pm$5 & 1.70\
V2495 Cyg & HH 629, MHO 916, MHO 924, MHO 927 & 0.76 & 1.37 & 55$\pm$5 & 15.46\
CN1 & HH 632jet+knot A & 0.20 & … & 0$\pm$5 & …\
core \#33 & MHO 923A and B, MHO 926 & 0.55 & 0.55 & 135$\pm$5 & 44.74\
IRAS 14 & MHO 925 & 0.19 & … & 185$\pm$5 & 3.15\
I21005+5217 & MHO 928, MHO 929, MHO 933 & 0.28 & 0.56 & 130$\pm$25 & 11.73\
I21005+5217 & MHO 930, MHO 935 & 0.20 & 0.46 & 35$\pm$5 & 10.75\
\
\
… & MHO 905 & … & … & 45$\pm$15 & 1.06\
core \#44(?) & HH 969 & *0.35* & … & 280$\pm$15 & …\
IRAS 15N & MHO 919, MHO 921, HH 977 & 0.25 & 0.20 & 160$\pm$5 & 15.89\
IRAS 15N & MHO 920, MHO 921C, HH 631A and B & 0.27 & 0.22 & 9$\pm$5 & 11.37\
core \#26 & MHO 936 & 0.19 & … & 219$\pm$15 & 13.17\
core \#15 & MHO 931 & 1.15 & … & 127$\pm$5 & 6.09\
core \#8 & MHO 932 & 0.70 & … & 70$\pm$15 & 28.12\
core \#40 & MHO 934 & 1.74 & … & 310$\pm$15 & 3.05\
Figure\[fig:braid\] shows the immediate surroundings of the Braid Nebula. There is a considerable number of HH objects and MHOs in this region. Identifying the driving sources of each outflow is difficult; spectroscopic studies would help narrow down the number of YSO candidates in the region. Here we have yet another case of FUOri type outburst star, V2495Cyg [@movsessian:2006; @kazarovets:2011], which illuminates the Braid Nebula and drives the parsec-scale bipolar outflow (V2495Cyg outflow). This region hosts a number of prominent IRAS objects (dashed circles) and CSO 1.1mm cores (solid-line contours) which most likely host several protostars.
A complete and detailed description of the other regions where outflows are detected is presented in Appendix\[sec:outfldet\] and \[sec:mhodetails\]; in these appendices each MHO and its association with neighbouring MHOs and YSOs is described in detail. Here in Table\[tab:outflows\] we present only an overview of each region, where the first column lists the driving sources followed by the names of individual components in the second column. The third and fourth columns give separate lobe lengths for each outflow in parsecs. The fifth column lists the outflow orientation measured East of North in degrees, while the sixth column lists the H$_2$ 1-0 S(1) line luminosity in units of L$_{\sun}$ for the entire outflow. The luminosity was calculated by combining the extinction corrected H$_2$ 1-0 S(1) luminosity values for each individual MHO in the outflow. The extinction values used in the calculation (see Tab.\[tab:mhos\] for more details) were obtained from the near-infrared extinction map discussed later in (Sec.\[sec:discussion\]).
The observations described above reveal the extent of outflow activity in this region. At least 28 outflows are identified (Tab.\[tab:outflows\]) of which 15 are bipolar and 5 monopolar. There are eight additional cases (two bipolar and six monopolar) where there is some ambiguity and further studies are essential. The two unconfirmed bipolar outflows possibly emanating from IRAS15N (see Sect.\[sec:braid\]) are difficult to confirm without further high-resolution imaging and spectroscopy due to the very complicated nature of the surrounding environment (Fig.\[fig:braid\]). Finally, we suggest that the locations of the MHO931 and 932 driving sources are coincident with cores \#15 and \#8, respectively (Figure\[fig:outflows\]), while the bow-shock MHO934 is probably driven by core \#40 or even core \#43 (but obviously not by HD200594).
Discussion {#sec:discussion}
==========
{width="14cm"}
Outflow parameters {#sec:outflparam}
------------------
Figure\[fig:outflows\] reveals the map of visual extinction (A$_V$) for the entire surveyed field, where the positions of MHOs and HH objects are marked and the directions of associated outflows indicated. YSO positions are overlaid together with CSO 1.1mm and IRAS HiRes contours. The outflow features are generally confined to the main high-extinction regions, namely LDN1003 and 1004, where most of the molecular material is located. The combined representation of A$_V$ and CSO 1.1mm illustrates all of the dust contained in the region, since for the higher extinction regions the A$_V$ map is less sensitive to high column density structures, in contrast to the CSO 1.1mm map which is more sensitive in these regions [@kirk:2006; @davis:2008].
Figure\[fig:outflowhist\] shows the distribution of outflow lobe lengths uncorrected for flow inclination angle. We observe a range of flow lengths, from 0.1 pc (I20583+5228) to 1.37 pc (V2495Cyg). The distribution peaks at around 0.3 pc. The mean value of the distribution without the V2494Cyg outflow components, which differs substantially from the majority of flows detected in the region, is about 0.5 pc. If we assume a flow inclination angle of 45 degrees to the line of sight, then the mean outflow single-lobe length is 0.71 pc. It would take at least 13,800 years for an outflow with a constant speed of 50 km s$^{-1}$ to propagate over this distance, assuming a uniform density medium [@arce:2007]. This mean dynamical age ($\sim$10$^4$ yr) for the outflows in the Braid Nebula region is comparable to the duration of the low-mass protostellar phase, as derived from statistical studies of the protostellar populations in a number star formation regions. These studies indicate a protostellar lifetime of 10$^4$$-$10$^5$ years [@froebrich:2006; @hatchell:2007; @enoch:2008; @davis:2009]. Our estimate of the mean flow lifetime also indicates that, in the Braid Nebula Region, we are observing a recent phase of star formation.
@evans:2009 predict a longer time-span for the protostellar phase, of the order of 10$^5$$-$10$^6$ years. This may indicate that most of our outflows are driven by very early phase (Class0 or Class I) protostars. However, as we discuss later, this may not be the case. Instead, we may be underestimating the mean flow dynamical age; we may not be detecting the terminating shocks of the outflows when they leave the main high-extinction ridge-like structure associated with the Braid Nebula region (Fig.\[fig:outflows\]) and therefore may be underestimating the mean flow length. In reality, the apparent filamentary structure of the molecular cloud in Fig.\[fig:outflows\] suggests a more clumpy environment, which would result in the detection of outflow features (HH objects and MHOs) only when there is sufficiently dense ambient molecular material to interact with. Such a scenario has been reported in several similar wide-field studies: of Corona Australis [@kumar:2011], Orion [@davis:2009] and the DR21 region [@davis:2007]. Furthermore, the distance to the region would impose a lower limit for the detected outflow lengths, preventing a proper statistical analysis. Therefore any attempt to characterise the outflow lengths should be interpreted with caution.
![Histogram of the outflow lobe lengths, measured in parsecs and arc-minutes, as listed in Tab.\[tab:outflows\]. The filled histogram bars exclude the questionable outflows (identified in Tab.\[tab:outflows\]), which are represented by the hatched bars.[]{data-label="fig:outflowhist"}](outflowhist.jpg){width="8.8cm"}
![Distribution of outflow position angles (P.A.) measured East of North (see Tab.\[tab:outflows\]). The filled histogram bars shows all of the detected outflows; the hatched bars show only the bipolar outflows.[]{data-label="fig:outflow-angle"}](outflow-angle.jpg){width="8.8cm"}
For outflow orientation angles (Tab.\[tab:outflows\]) we performed a Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test which gave us 95$\%$ probability that our distribution is drawn from a homogeneously distributed sample. Any further attempts to get a correlation between outflow position angles and the orientations of the long axes of associated IRAS sources or CSO 1.1mm cores was thought to be premature at this stage, due to the low statistical sample in our possession. However, our current analysis does seem to suggest that there is no preferable outflow orientation in the region (Fig.\[fig:outflow-angle\]), as is found to be the case in many other regions [e.g. Orion: @davis:2009].
Table\[tab:outflows\] also lists the luminosity of the outflows in H$_2$ 1-0 S(1) line emission, corrected for the extinction. The missing values correspond to the few cases (six out of 28) when outflows were only detected at optical wavelengths. These flows could produce H$_2$ 1-0 S(1) line emission that is fainter than our detection limit of $\sim$10$^{-7}$ W m$^{-2}$ calculated in a standard 5aperture, which would corresponds to $\sim$ 0.2$\times$ 10$^{-3}$ L$\sun$ per outflow component (without an extinction correction). In a few cases (eight out of the 22 remaining) outflows are only partially detected in H$_2$ 1-0 S(1) line: for example, sometimes one of the bipolar outflow lobes is traced by optical HH objects, without any corresponding near-infrared shock features (MHOs). In these cases we still present the integrated luminosities of one lobe (if it is detected in the NIR) in Tab.\[tab:outflows\], but regard these values as a lower limit in our subsequent determination of the outflow power necessary to drive these shocks using bow shock models [cf. @smith:1991; @smith:2003] or hydrodynamic simulations [cf. @smith:2005; @smith:2007].
As a comparison, the outflows detected in Orion [@stanke:2002], which is half the distance to the Braid Nebula region, range from 0.04 to 20 $\times$ 10$^{-3}$ L$\sun$, while the faintest outflows detected in DR21 [@davis:2007], which is about four times further than our region, have luminosities of about 30 $\times$ 10$^{-3}$ L$\sun$ in H$_2$ 1-0 S(1) line. Sensitivity limitations affect the completeness of statistical samples of outflows, since we tend to detect only the luminous ones as we observe more distant regions.
The force of the outflows from protostars (Class0/I sources) is correlated with the bolometric luminosity over several orders of magnitude [@beuther:2002]. For protostars, the bolometric luminosity (L$_{bol}$) is dominated by the energy released through accretion, expressed as the accretion luminosity ($L_{acc}$). In order to reliably determine or give an estimate of this value, more thorough modelling is required, based on a well sampled Spectral Energy Distribution (SED) for each source. Unfortunately, our current SED coverage for the driving source candidates in the Braid Nebula Region is quite limited (see Tab.\[tab:photom\]). This prevents us from obtaining reliable estimates for source bolometric luminosities. However, as an approximation, we could connect the outflow power to the $L_{bol}$ of the driving source, using the known correlation with outflow force (and a weak velocity dependence).
However, the accretion rate also depends on the evolutionary phase. For low-mass stars, the most luminous outflows are generally driven from the youngest (Class0/I) protostars in the same mass range [@stanke:2003] due to the high early accretion rate. The outflow power and the observed luminosity would then decrease with the evolutionary age due to the diminishing accretion rate. However, this relation is also strongly dependent on the mass of the protostar itself, with the more massive sources possibly increasing their accretion rates as they evolve through these early stages [e.g. the accelerated accretion model of @mckee:2003]. In this case, luminous outflows could be detected even from the relatively evolved massive protostellar sources.
![A plot showing the dependence of the near- to mid-infrared spectral slope ($\alpha$) to the luminosity of the associated outflow derived from the H$_2$ 1-0 S(1) line flux. The vertical hatched area around $\alpha$ $=$ 3 shows the upper tentative border for the ClassI and 0 protostars according to @lada:1987; the vertical dashed line at $\alpha$ $=$ 0.3 indicates the border between ClassI and Flat Spectra type sources according to @greene:1994. The error for the flux values was assumed to be of the order of 20$\%$. The solid line represents the derived best-fit for the plotted data points of the form: $y=(26.5\pm2.9)x - (8.8\pm4.6)$ with $\chi^2$ = 77.6.[]{data-label="fig:alpha-h2"}](alpha-h2.jpg){width="8.8cm"}
Some of the known outflows from massive protostars have substantially higher luminosities than their low-mass counterparts. For example, IRAS05358+3543 [@beuther:2002a] drives the N1-N6 outflow (MHO 1401-1406) which in H$_2$ 1-0 S(1) line emission has a luminosity of 136 $\times$ 10$^{-3}$ L$\sun$ [@khanzadyan:2004], while the IRAS20126+4104 jet MHO 860 [@caratti-o-garatti:2008] produces an H$_2$ 1-0 S(1) line luminosity of 128 $\times$ 10$^{-3}$ L$\sun$. By comparison, the well known low-mass Class0 protostellar outflows, HH212 and HH211, have luminosities in H$_2$ 1-0 S(1) emission of 6.9 and 3.4 $\times$ 10$^{-3}$ L$\sun$, respectively [@stanke:2002]. The outflows in the Braid Nebula region on average have higher luminosities than would be expected from low-mass protostars (Tab.\[tab:outflows\]). This would suggest that our outflows are being driven by at least intermediate mass or possible even high mass protostars.
Lastly, in Fig.\[fig:alpha-h2\] we look for a relationship between the H$_2$ 1-0 S(1) line luminosity of the flows (Tab.\[tab:outflows\]) with the near- to mid-infrared spectral slope ($\alpha$) of the driving source (Tab.\[tab:ccanalysis\]). Discussion of source spectral slopes will be presented in Sect.\[sec:protcont\]; here we simply assume that $\alpha$ is an indication of the age of the source, where higher values correspond to younger driving sources (simply because there is more dust around the source). The original scheme described in [@greene:1994] regards values between -0.3 and 0.3 as flat spectrum sources and values greater than 0.3 as ClassI sources. Since Class0 sources (which are thought to be younger than Class I objects) do not have any emission in the mid-infrared, we assume a tentative value of $\alpha \sim 3$ for the border between Class 0 and Class I objects [@lada:1987], the latter having $\alpha$ $<$ 3.
The best-fit line shown on Fig.\[fig:alpha-h2\] indicates a dependency between outflow power and the evolutionary state of the driving source. The younger the system is the higher the overall outflow luminosity in H$_2$ 1-0 S(1) line emission, which means the more energetic and more powerful the outflow is. The power of the outflows, on the other hand, decreases as the protostar ages which would seem to be a logical conclusion since a similar pattern is observed in low-mass outflows [@stanke:2003]. However, the fit to the data in Fig.\[fig:alpha-h2\] is relatively poor. This could be due to the different masses and multiplicity of the driving sources. There are several other factors which could have an influence on the data: erroneous extinction calculations towards the outflow components, the somewhat uncertain distance estimate to the region, and questionable spectral slope ($\alpha$) determinations using the AKARI bands.
A more comprehensive approach to the outflow luminosity analysis is essential to test the relationship between protostellar evolutionary phase and outflow flux. In particular, a correlation between outflow luminosity and the bolometric luminosity, $L_{bol}$, of the driving source may exist. Such a correlation has been demonstrated for low-mass protostars and their outflows [@caratti-o-garatti:2008]; does this relationship extend towards intermediate and high-mass protostars? Unfortunately the current limited dataset for the driving sources in the Braid Nebula region (Tab.\[tab:sources\]) limits the accuracy of our $L_{bol}$ determinations, although additional observing campaigns are underway to fill the existing gaps in the source SEDs.
Protostellar content {#sec:protcont}
--------------------
![A near-infrared J - Hvs.H - K$_S$ colour-colour diagram for sources in the studied field with high quality ($q=3$) AKARI/IRC fluxes. Values are plotted in the 2MASS photometric system; the main sequence, dwarf and giant loci, as well as the CTTS loci [@meyer:1997], are drawn along with reddening vectors. The colour bar and the size of the circles indicate the value of spectral slope ($\alpha$) calculated over the K to 9$\mu$m or K to 18$\mu$m range of the SED (see Sect.\[sec:protcont\] for an explanation).[]{data-label="fig:ccdjhhk"}](ccdjhhk.jpg){width="8.8cm"}
![Near- to mid-infrared colour-colour diagrams for the same sources as plotted in Fig.\[fig:ccdjhhk\]. **Top panel:** a J - K$_S$vs.K$_S$ - S9W colour-colour diagram [@takita:2010] for all sources found in the one-square-degree field with valid near-IR fluxes in the 2MASS catalogue and 9$\mu$m fluxes in the AKARI/IRC catalogue (Fig.\[fig:field-overview\]). The arrow shows the interstellar extinction vector estimated from the @weingartner:2001 Milky Way model for R$_V$ = 3.1. Dashed-line and solid-line parallelograms show the distribution of CTTSs in the Taurus-Auriga region [@takita:2010] and the distribution of driving sources in our region, respectively. **Bottom panel:** a J - K$_S$vs.K$_S$ - L18W colour-colour diagram similar to the top panel, but for sources with valid JHK$_S$ fluxes in the 2MASS catalogue and 18$\mu$m fluxes in the AKARI/IRC catalogue. Colour-bars and symbol sizes indicate the magnitude of the spectral slope ($\alpha$).[]{data-label="fig:ccdmir"}](ccdmir.jpg){width="8.8cm"}
A first look at the multi-waveband source association (Tab.\[tab:sources\]) reaffirms some of the suggestions for the driving sources (16 out of 24) due to their detections in the mid-infrared range which is indicative of a circumstellar disk. In relatively few cases (14 objects) the driving source candidates are detected in the far-infrared to millimetre range which tends to be when the source is embedded and young. Core\#44 and IRAS20575+5210 sources are only detectable in the far-infrared to millimetre range which is indicative of a very young, probably Class0 stage protostar pending further confirmation.
In order to determine the protostellar content of the studied region we cross-correlated the near-infrared 2MASS K$_s$ and mid-infrared AKARI/IRC (9 and 18$\mu$m) catalogues using only the high quality photometric measurements. This resulted in the detection of 76 sources with both K$_s$ and S9W band measurements. Of these 76 sources, only 22 have L18W band data. We performed the same procedure using our WFCAM K band photometric catalogue[^5] and obtained identical results because of the overall low sensitivity of the AKARI/IRC measurements. Finally, we have also included some additional sources which have no AKARI/IRC match but are suspected of being a driving source due to their locations relative to HH objects and MHOs.
In Figure\[fig:ccdjhhk\] we present a near-infrared J- Hvs.H-K$_s$ colour-colour diagram where only the outflow driving sources and the suspected candidates are marked for clarity. The majority of the sources appear to be relatively reddened main-sequence stars. Most of the outflow driving sources exhibit typical CTTS colour characteristics with some amount of extinction [@meyer:1997]. Some sources, like IRAS14, IRAS20588+5221 and core\#33 (not shown due to H-K$_s$=5.95) stand-out as being intrinsically red.
In Figure\[fig:ccdmir\](top) we show a near- to mid-infrared J-K$_s$vs.K$_s$-S9W colour-colour diagram for the same sources plotted in Figure\[fig:ccdjhhk\]. Here one can clearly see the main-sequence stars which occupy a distinct region to the left of the plot, as noted by @takita:2010. The population of outflow driving sources in the Braid Nebula region are enclosed by a parallelogram; this parallelogram is clearly shifted with respect to the CTTS stars observed in the Taurus-Auriga complex, which are indicated by the dashed-line parallelogram. Although the apparent shift in the average colours of the Braid nebula sources could be due to increased extinction along the line of sight to the region (the Braid is more distant than Taurus-Auriga, by a factor of $\sim$2), many of the sources are redder in K$_s$-S9W and K$_s$-L18W. The position of the dashed-line parallelogram on the diagram suggests the presence of excess radiation at or around 9$\mu$m, which is generally consistent with the presence of accreting disk. Three of the driving sources (IRAS14, IRAS20588+5221 and core\#33) appear extremely red on the J-Kvs.K-S9W diagram. These three sources may be particularly young, or they may simply be viewed “edge-on” (i.e. with their outflow axes close to the plane of the sky).
Fig.\[fig:ccdmir\] (bottom) shows a J-Kvs.K-L18W colour-colour diagram. Only sources with a clear AKARI/IRC 18$\mu$m detection are plotted. This diagram further highlights the reddening and extreme youth of IRAS14, IRAS20588+5221 and core\#33. The excess radiation at mid-IR wavelengths from their protostellar envelopes is particularly strong. The shifted between the Taurus-Auriga CTTSs and the Braid Nebula region driving sources is also more extreme in this figure.
Our colour-colour analysis of the sources in the studied region reveals the apparent protostellar nature of the driving sources. It also appears to show the deficit of CTTSs in the region. However, in our view this is a result of observational bias. The limited sensitivity of the AKARI/IRC data (0.05Jy in 9$\mu$m and 0.09Jy in 18$\mu$m) and the larger interstellar extinction towards the Braid Nebula would prevent the detection of many of the CTTSs, which in general would have a mid-infrared flux that is below our detection limit. Alternatively, this could indicate that Braid Nebula Star Formation region hosts more energetic (two FUOri type stars) and relatively massive protostars than that of the Taurus-Auriga system.
![A histogram showing the distribution of spectral slope ($\alpha$) for the sources with valid fluxes in the 2MASS and AKARI/IRC catalogues for the entire one-square-degree field. Slopes derived using K to 9$\mu$m photometry and K to 18$\mu$m data are plotted separately using filled and hatched histogram bars, respectively. Protostellar classifications are also indicated following @greene:1994 and @evans:2009.[]{data-label="fig:ccdhist"}](ccdhist.jpg){width="8.8cm"}
------------------ ------------- ------------- ------------------ -------------- ------- -------- ------------
Source RA Dec $\alpha_{18}$ $\alpha_{9}$ Outfl.
Name (2000.0) (2000.0) (K-L18W) (K-S9W) Class Det. Comment
Z20566+5213 20:58:11.41 +52:25:27.9 … … … Y no AKARI
V2494Cyg 20:58:21.10 +52:29:27.9 1.07($\pm$0.22) 1.32 I Y
I20573+5221 20:58:50.09 +52:32:54.3 -0.18($\pm$0.25) -0.47 F Y
CN5 20:59:04.19 +52:21:44.8 … … … N no AKARI
core \#44 20:59:04.72 +52:31:38.2 … … 0? Y no NIR+MIR
I20575+5210 20:59:07.63 +52:22:21.7 … … 0? Y no NIR+MIR
CN4 20:59:08.95 +52:22:39.2 … … … N no AKARI
CN6N 20:59:40.01 +52:34:36.2 … -1.68 III? N field
CN6(core \#51) 20:59:40.72 +52:34:13.6 0.47($\pm$0.21) 0.71 I Y
R20582+5221 20 59 46.20 +52 33 21.6 0.23($\pm$0.05) 0.17 F Y
I20583+5228 20:59:51.85 +52:40:20.6 0.45($\pm$0.07) 0.36 I Y
CN3N 21:00:03.77 +52:34:29.0 -0.31($\pm$0.12) -0.18 II Y
Cyg 19 21:00:11.59 +52:18:17.2 … … 0? Y no AKARI
CN2 21:00:16.61 +52:26:22.9 … … … Y no AKARI
CN8 21:00:19.04 +52:27:28.2 -0.11($\pm$0.06) -0.18 F ?
IRAS 15N 21:00:21.41 +52:27:09.5 0.69($\pm$0.04) 0.74 I Y
I20588+5221 21:00:21.43 +52:22:57.1 1.66($\pm$0.63) 2.38 I Y
V2495Cyg 21:00:25.38 +52:30:15.5 0.87($\pm$0.03) 0.90 I Y
CN1 21:00:35.30 +52:33:26.0 0.67($\pm$0.21) 0.42 I Y
core \#33 21:00:38.80 +52:27:58.0 1.96($\pm$0.55) 2.58 I Y
IRAS 14 21:00:42.38 +52:26:00.7 1.31($\pm$0.18) 1.52 I Y
21015977+5220127 21:01:59.77 +52:20:12.7 … -1.95 III? N field
I21005+5217 21:02:05.47 +52:28:54.4 0.92($\pm$0.07) 1.00 I Y
HD 200594 21:02:23.91 +52:34:32.9 … … … N no AKARI
------------------ ------------- ------------- ------------------ -------------- ------- -------- ------------
The Spectral Index ($\alpha$), the slope of the SED calculated between 2 to 20$\mu$m, is another useful method for determining the protostellar evolutionary phase [@lada:1987]. This method has been revised and adjusted several times [@greene:1994] to explain some of the new details emerging from recent multi-waveband large scale studies [e.g. @evans:2009]. Here we use the same approach [@greene:1994] and calculate the spectral slope of the SED for the sources in the studied region. Figure\[fig:ccdhist\] shows a histogram of near- to mid-infrared Spectral Slope values for all of the sources found in the Braid Nebula region with valid 2MASS and AKARI/IRC fluxes. The filled histogram bars (Fig.\[fig:ccdhist\]) show the distribution of sources with $\alpha$ calculated between K and 9$\mu$m; the hatched histogram bars shows the distribution for sources with values calculated between K and 18$\mu$m. The vertical dashed lines mark the ranges in $\alpha$ that correspond to the various protostellar phases [@greene:1994]. This plot also aids in distinguishing the protostellar content of the Braid Nebula Star Formation Region. We see two separate distributions, one tracing the younger stellar content (-1 $<$ $\alpha$ $<$ 3) and the other the more evolved or most likely background objects (-1 $<$ $\alpha$ $<$ -3).
In Table\[tab:ccanalysis\] we list the driving source candidates with their coordinates along with values for the fitted Spectral Index ($\alpha$) measured between K and 18$\mu$m ($\alpha_{18}$) and K and 9$\mu$m ($\alpha_{9}$). We also list the associated source classification using $\alpha_{18}$ following @greene:1994. It is worth noting here that this classification scheme has never been tested with AKARI/IRC fluxes and consequently the reliability of the procedure is unknown. The value of $\alpha$ can be different when one of the AKARI/IRC fluxes is missing. In such cases the source could be miss-classified, so the current results should be used with some degree of caution and, if possible, with the positional information of the sources with respect to dense cores in the region. Never-the-less, the statistics suggest that most molecular outflows are associated with ClassI protostars, in agreement with many similar studies [e.g. Orion @davis:2009]. Further multi-waveband analysis and SED modelling will be carried-out in our continued study of these sources to determine the exact parameters and the evolutionary stage of the protostars in the studied region.
Outflows from FU Ori stars
--------------------------
The Braid Nebula Region contains two FUOri type outburst stars [@aspin:2009], V2494Cyg and V2495Cyg, both of which drive parsec-scale outflows traced by chains of HH objects and MHOs (Table\[tab:outflows\]). The association of outflows with FUOri type outburst stars is not unusual. More than half of the 20 known FUOri objects drive collimated jets, and almost all have been shown to possess powerful winds [@reipurth:2010]. The energy fluxes of the outflows from FUOri objects far exceed the luminosities of the pre-outburst stars [@calvet:1998]. The outflows must therefore be powered by accretion. This result is consistent with the strong correlation between measured mass-loss rates and accretion rates [@hartmann:2009].
FUOri outbursts are believed to be connected to periods of increased accretion [in which the accretion rate may reach as high as 10$^{-4}$ M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$; @hartmann:1985; @hartmann:1996]. An FUOri object may experience hundreds of outbursts [@covey:2011; @miller:2011]. During these outbursts the central object may gain as much as 10% to 25% of its final mass [@herbig:1977; @hartmann:1996; @greene:2008]. The time-scale between FUOri outbursts is typically of the order of 10$^3$ years [@hartmann:2009]. There are, however, subtle differences between the observed light curves of some objects [see @reipurth:2010 for the details]. A number of mechanisms may therefore be at work. These include: a pile-up of infalling matter in the disk which, when accreted, results in a short-lived outburst [e.g., @hartmann:1996; @zhu:2009]; disk thermal instabilities [@bell:1994; @armitage:2001]; disk fragmentation processes [@vorobyov:2006; @vorobyov:2010]; and disk perturbations caused by a planet [@clarke:2005], a close encounter with a companion in an eccentric orbit [@bonnell:1992; @artymowicz:1996], or an encounter with another member of a dense star cluster [@pfalzner:2008]. Distinguishing between these models is observationally very difficult. Even so, based on the symmetry often observed in HH jets and MHO outflows (HH212 is the most striking example, though this jet is not known to be driven by an FUOri object), one may at least make a crude estimate of the time-scale between outburst events.
It is not unreasonable to assume that the FUOri objects found in the Braid Nebula region, V2494Cyg and V2495Cyg, have undergone several outbursts in the last $\sim$10$^5$ years. The HH objects and MHOs detected in the bipolar flow lobes associated with each young star probably represent a fossil record of these outburst events. V2494Cyg drives an outflow, traced by HH381/966/967 and MHO900-904 (see e.g. Fig.\[fig:v2494cygwide\] and Table\[tab:outflows\]) that extends over $\sim$10 pc; the V2495Cyg outflow extends over almost 3 pc when measured from end-to-end and likewise includes a number of HH objects (HH629) and MHOs (MHO916/924/927: Table\[tab:outflows\]). Features seen in the opposing lobes of each bipolar outflow that are at equal distances from the driving source may be associated with the same outburst event. For example, MHO 900 and 904 are roughly equidistant from the driving source, V2494Cyg. The propagation speeds of these shock fronts have not been measured, though MHOs typically possess proper motions of $\sim$10$^2$ kms$^{-1}$ [e.g. @davis:2009], while similar tangential velocities have been measured for HH objects [e.g. @eisloffel:1994]. The dynamical ages of MHO 900 and 904 (i.e. the time for each shock front to propagate over the observed distance from V2494Cyg) are of the order of $10^5$ years. This means that V2494Cyg has been outbursting for at least 100,000 years.
MHO 902 and HH 966 may be associated with a more recent outburst event from V2494Cyg; with an average distance of 2.7pc, their dynamical ages are of the order of $10^4$ years. Closer to the source, MHO901 has an estimated dynamical age of 3.5$\times$10$^3$yrs (although no corresponding feature is detected in the opposing outflow lobe). The HH381jet is the shock feature closest to the central source [@magakian:2010]. Assuming the same propagation speed, the jet length indicates a dynamical time scale of $\sim$75 years. Since V2494Cyg is currently undergoing an outburst, the time scale between (recent) outbursts may be as short as $\sim$100 years.
Similar analysis is possible for the Braid star, V2495Cyg (the most distant knot, MHO927B/HH635, corresponds to an age of 3$\times$10$^4$ yrs, MHO924 and HH635 knots F and G correspond to 7.5$\times$10$^3$ years, HH635E to 4.5$\times$10$^3$ years, and HH635D to 2.3$\times$10$^3$ years), although no HH objects/compact jet or MHOs are observed very close to the driving source. We stress, however, that the ambient medium may affect the “flow lengths" measured here. The propagation distances are not corrected for inclination angle, and not all shock working surfaces may be visible (some features may be too faint and/or may be hidden by extinction). At best, these estimates are probably only accurate to within an order of magnitude.
Star formation in the region: An Updated picture
------------------------------------------------
The star formation activity within the studied region (Fig.\[fig:field-overview\]) has been proven numerous times in our previous works [@movsessian:2003; @movsessian:2006; @aspin:2009; @aspin:2011; @magakian:2010]. In this current study, which focuses on the near-infrared outflows and their driving sources, we add another layer to the existing information on the region. These new data undoubtedly lead to a broader picture of star formation activity occurring in the Braid Nebula region.
Careful examination of the surveyed region using the new results discussed in Sections\[sec:outflparam\] and \[sec:protcont\] show a clear association between the outflows, their driving sources and the main regions of high extinction, namely LDN1003 and 1004 (cf. Fig.\[fig:field-overview\]). These high-$A_V$ regions extend roughly North-West to South-East and broadly speaking coincide with HiRes 100$\mu$m emission features and CSO 1.1mm peaks, as can be seen in Fig.\[fig:outflows\]. There is a general correlation between the CSO 1.1mm emission and A$_V$ data [@aspin:2009], the A$_V$ data being more sensitive to the low extinct areas, whereas the CSO 1.1mm emission traces the very high extinction areas [@kirk:2006; @davis:2008]. Somewhat surprisingly there is a large 1.1 mm dust core 10-20 north of LDN 1004 that does not coincide with a region of high extinction or any young stars or outflow features (HH objects or MHOs). This peak may be too diffuse to produce star forming cores; note also that the $A_V$ map is higher-resolution than the CSO data.
There seems to be a distinct difference between the LDN1003 and 1004 regions in general. The A$_V$ map in Fig.\[fig:outflows\] suggests that LDN1004 has more diffuse and extended structure, while LDN1003 is more filamentary. There is less extended IRAS HiRes 100$\mu$m emission in LDN1003 than in the East (LDN1004) and north-east, where there are isolated patches of IRAS HiRes 100$\mu$m emission. This indicates that the area could still be gravitationally unbound or located further away.
While most of the outflows (23 out of 28) are being driven from protostars in LDN1003, we were able to detect only five outflows emanating from sources located in LDN1004. The same stark difference is evident when one considers the protostellar content, where most of the identified protostars are located in the LDN1003 cloud (Fig.\[fig:outflows\]).
The differences outlined above suggest that LDN1003 is going through an active phase of star formation. By comparison, star formation may be just starting in LDN1004, as evidenced by the low number of outflows and protostars detected there. The extended diffuse gas traced by IRAS HiRes 100$\mu$m emission could eventually form dense cores from which a new generation of protostars could form. Based on our suite of observations of the region, we are not able to state conclusively why star formation started in LDN1003 earlier than in LDN1004. All of the evidence seems to suggest that star formation is moving from LDN1003 toward LDN1004.
Finally, we caution that the observed differences between LDN1003 and LDN1004 could simply be a result of LDN1004 being located further away than LDN1003. For this to explain the apparent paucity of star formation in LDN1004, it would need to be at least twice as far away as LDN1003. There is no evidence for this in the literature.
SUMMARY {#sec:summary}
=======
We have studied a one-square-degree field centred on the Braid Nebula using the near-infrared H$_2$ 1-0 S(1) line to trace the outflows and shocks driven by the many young stars found in the region [@aspin:2009]. Our analysis is complemented by optical H$\alpha$ and \[SII\] observations of HH shocks @magakian:2010 as well as archival multi-waveband photometry datasets. Our main findings and conclusion are as follows:
1. We have detected 37 complex MHOs comprising 79 individual knots and bow shocks; 32 of the 79 H$_2$ features are associated with optical HH objects. This significant increase in the number of detected outflow features is expected due to the considerable optical extinction present in the area.
2. The newly-detected MHOs and previously discovered HH objects enable us to discern 20 outflows from which 15 are bipolar and five are monopolar. We have also detected a further 8 possible outflows of which two are bipolar and six are monopolar.
3. We were also able to identify the driving sources of many of the outflows with high certainty using positional and colour-colour analysis. Of the 18 identified sources two drive multiple, almost perpendicular outflows, suggesting a multiple system of young stars in each case. All but a handful of sources have the distinct colours of embedded protostars prescribed to the ClassI evolutionary phase. Three of the sources are undetected at near- and mid-infrared wavelengths, suggesting a Class0 protostellar phase. We also suggest that the protostellar population present in this star formation region differs slightly from that of Taurus-Auriga, in the sense that our objects are possibly more energetic and/or more massive.
4. Both FUOri outburst type stars drive significant bipolar outflows. Our analysis suggest a connection between outflow ejection and repetitive FUOri outburst events.
5. Consideration of the multi-waveband photometry, combined with the outflow information described in detail in this paper, suggests that the star-formation in the Braid Nebula Star Formation region is progressing from LDN1003 in the West/South-West to LDN1004 in the East/South-East.
This research has made use of the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France as well as software provided by the UK’s AstroGrid Virtual Observatory Project, which is funded by the Science and Technology Facilities Council and through the EU’s Framework 6 programme. This research has made use of the NASA/ IPAC Infrared Science Archive, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. In particular data from IRAS, MSX, AKARI and 2MASS missions were used. *The authors wish to recognise and acknowledge the very significant cultural role and reverence that the summit of Mauna Kea has always had within the indigenous Hawaiian community. We are most fortunate to have the opportunity to conduct observations from this sacred mountain.*
Individual Molecular Hydrogen emission-line Objects {#sec:indmho}
===================================================
Our analysis of the entire one-square-degree field (Fig.\[fig:field-overview\]) has revealed more than 200 individual H$_2$ 1-0 S(1) emission line knots, bow shocks, and spikes which we group into 37 MHOs according to their positions and overall morphology. The MHO numbers from 900 to 936 were assigned according to the rising RA of each feature. In Table\[tab:mhos\] we list the names and coordinates of the detected MHOs in the first, second and third columns, respectively. Columns four and five list the observed and de-reddened fluxes for each MHO. Column six records the visual extinction (A$_V$) obtained from the extinction map of the region presented in Fig.\[fig:outflows\]. Column seven and eight describe the morphology and list any Herbig-Haro (HH) objects associated with the 37 individual MHOs.
[lcccccll]{}
\
MHO & RA & Dec & & A$_V$ &Morphology & HH Assoc.\
\# & (2000) & (2000) & obs. & dered. & & &\
\
MHO & RA & Dec & & A$_V$ & Morphology & HH Assoc.\
\# & (2000) & (2000) & obs. & dered. & & &\
900 & 20:58:07.7 & +52:48:59 & 51.28 & 51.92 & 0.12 & irregular & …\
901A & 20:58:21.7 & +52:27:33 & 2.07 & 2.66 & 2.43 & tip of the bow & HH 382E\
901B & 20:58:21.9 & +52:27:39 & 3.70 & 4.75 & 2.43 & wings of the bow & HH 382E\
901C & 20:58:22.7 & +52:27:48 & 2.07 & 2.68 & 2.50 & compact & …\
901D & 20:58:22.4 & +52:27:54 & 4.75 & 6.15 & 2.51 & compact & HH 382F\
902A & 20:58:24.5 & +52:17:18 & 14.85 & 15.10 & 0.16 & bright & compact & HH 382\
902B & 20:58:25.2 & +52:18:10 & 4.20 & 4.27 & 0.16 & faint knot & …\
902C & 20:58:26.4 & +52:18:29 & 44.32 & 45.24 & 0.20 & bright bow-like & …\
902D & 20:58:26.9 & +52:17:59 & 4.64 & 4.75 & 0.23 & compact & HH 382D\
903 & 20:58:45.5 & +52:22:48 & 38.04 & 51.94 & 3.02 & diffuse pair & …\
904A & 20:58:46.3 & +52:05:34 & 3.05 & 3.17 & 0.38 & faint & diffuse & …\
904B & 20:58:49.9 & +52:06:17 & 2.95 & 3.08 & 0.41 & faint & diffuse & …\
905 & 20:58:56.1 & +52:30:41 & 3.04 & 5.29 & 5.37 & compact, bow-like & …\
906A & 20:58:55.1 & +52:34:59 & 4.41 & 6.01 & 3.00 & faint & diffuse & HH 380F\
906B & 20:59:02.6 & +52:35:45 & 21.66 & 26.35 & 1.90 & diffuse & HH 380B(?)\
906C & 20:59:08.3 & +52:36:35 & 10.82 & 13.49 & 2.14 & extended, bow-like & HH 380C\
907A & 20:59:05.1 & +52:29:18 & 1.53 & 2.83 & 5.95 & faint & compact & …\
907B & 20:59:06.7 & +52:29:52 & 73.23 & 127.03& 5.34 & complex bow shock & HH 970\
908A & 20:59:05.9 & +52:22:32 & 15.44 & 21.63 & 3.27 & right, compact bow & …\
908B & 20:59:07.8 & +52:22:30 & 157.98& 217.51& 3.10 & right & compact & …\
908C & 20:59:08.6 & +52:22:27 & 7.77 & 10.47 & 2.89 & compact pair of bows & …\
908D & 20:59:11.0 & +52:22:29 & 4.87 & 6.42 & 2.68 & compact pair of knots & HH 974B(?)\
909A & 20:59:10.5 & +52:33:04 & 2.91 & 3.60 & 2.07 & faint shock front & …\
909B & 20:59:09.5 & +52:33:27 & 5.28 & 6.22 & 1.59 & compact knot & …\
909C & 20:59:08.8 & +52:33:39 & 2.51 & 3.07 & 1.94 & broken bow & …\
910A & 20:59:11.9 & +52:34:12 & 129.79& 143.45& 0.97 & complex bow shock & HH 380(A)\
910B & 20:59:15.2 & +52:34:19 & 5.74 & 6.24 & 0.81 & faint, diffuse flow & …\
910C & 20:59:14.9 & +52:35:10 & 2.67 & 2.98 & 1.05 & faint bow-like & HH 380E\
911 & 20:59:46.3 & +52:33:09 & 80.50 & 141.53& 5.47 & very bright bow & HH 627\
912A & 20:59:51.3 & +52:16:29 & 154.55& 200.43& 2.52 & complex of bow shocks & …\
912B & 20:59:56.7 & +52:17:13 & 7.04 & 9.51 & 2.92 & bright knot & …\
913A & 20:59:50.3 & +52:40:38 & 11.99 & 16.10 & 2.86 & bright & compact & HH 675\
913B & 20:59:51.3 & +52:40:34 & 8.38 & 11.26 & 2.86 & broken bow & …\
913C & 20:59:53.5 & +52:39:59 & 5.97 & 8.31 & 3.21 & diffuse, bow-like & …\
914A & 21:00:08.6 & +52:25:55 & 41.61 & 76.08 & 5.85 & bright & complex & …\
914B & 21:00:08.5 & +52:26:07 & 7.29 & 13.71 & 6.12 & diffuse & …\
915A & 21:00:03.8 & +52:17:28 & 5.63 & 7.61 & 2.92 & shock front & …\
915B & 21:00:06.9 & +52:18:01 & 5.39 & 7.37 & 3.03 & chain of faint bows & …\
915C & 21:00:11.7 & +52:18:25 & 16.97 & 26.31 & 4.25 & chain of knots & …\
915D & 21:00:15.4 & +52:19:02 & 3.20 & 5.42 & 5.10 & faint knot & …\
916 & 21:00:10.9 & +52:29:01 & 7.78 & 15.85 & 6.90 & pair of faint knots & HH 629(?)\
917 & 21:00:12.1 & +52:27:15 & 8.25 & 16.42 & 6.67 & compact bow shock & HH 670\
918 & 21:00:12.1 & +52:22:42 & 4.69 & 8.48 & 5.74 & faint & diffuse & …\
919A & 21:00:18.2 & +52:28:07 & 7.29 & 15.24 & 7.15 & bright & compact & HH 631E\
919B & 21:00:19.2 & +52:27:53 & 3.17 & 6.61 & 7.12 & compact & HH 631D\
920A & 21:00:18.5 & +52:25:55 & 24.59 & 46.23 & 6.12 & complex bow shock & HH 630A\
920B & 21:00:16.1 & +52:26:04 & 4.10 & 7.71 & 6.12 & faint & diffuse & …\
921A & 21:00:22.8 & +52:26:22 & 24.59 & 48.63 & 6.61 & complex bow shock & HH 977\
921B & 21:00:23.1 & +52:26:46 & 3.00 & 6.02 & 6.75 & faint shock & …\
921C & 21:00:20.7 & +52:26:41 & 1.50 & 2.93 & 6.48 & faint & diffuse & …\
922A & 21:00:28.9 & +52:20:25 & 5.93 & 10.00 & 5.07 & faint, extended bow & …\
922B & 21:00:32.4 & +52:21:02 & 30.72 & 51.67 & 5.04 & broken bow shock & …\
922C & 21:00:38.3 & +52:21:28 & 139.44& 227.37& 4.74 & pair of bright bows & …\
923A & 21:00:30.5 & +52:29:26 & 13.84 & 24.56 & 5.56 & compact bow shock & HH 448A\
923B & 21:00:31.7 & +52:29:18 & 50.61 & 92.16 & 5.81 & group of shocks & HH 448B,D\
923C & 21:00:36.2 & +52:29:36 & 42.63 & 67.67 & 4.48 & complex bow shock & HH 448G\
923D & 21:00:37.6 & +52:29:24 & 79.95 & 123.81& 4.24 & complex bow shocks & HH 448I\
924 & 21:00:42.5 & +52:31:43 & 30.15 & 41.77 & 3.16 & bright, compact bow & HH 635A\
925 & 21:00:42.7 & +52:25:11 & 9.24 & 15.75 & 5.17 & bright & compact & HH 633\
926A & 21:00:37.7 & +52:28:25 & 1.49 & 2.52 & 5.11 & compact & faint & HH 634A\
926B & 21:00:41.4 & +52:27:43 & 57.83 & 95.57 & 4.87 & complex bow shock & HH 634B\
926C & 21:00:48.7 & +52:26:49 & 5.68 & 8.79 & 4.23 & bright shock front & HH 634C\
927A & 21:00:52.0 & +52:33:27 & 10.00 & 13.18 & 2.68 & chain of knots & HH 635B\
927B & 21:00:56.0 & +52:33:50 & 5.21 & 6.48 & 2.11 & faint bow shock & HH 635C\
928 & 21:01:58.8 & +52:29:37 & 3.80 & 6.50 & 5.20 & faint pair of shocks & …\
929A & 21:01:57.1 & +52:29:00 & 5.28 & 10.50 & 6.66 & faint & diffuse & …\
929B & 21:01:59.3 & +52:28:56 & 5.91 & 11.69 & 6.61 & faint knot & …\
930A & 21:02:02.3 & +52:28:44 & 11.88 & 24.58 & 7.05 & faint shock & …\
930B & 21:02:02.3 & +52:28:38 & 4.68 & 9.68 & 7.05 & faint & diffuse & …\
930C & 21:02:00.9 & +52:28:08 & 5.83 & 12.89 & 7.69 & faint & diffuse & …\
931 & 21:02:02.8 & +52:19:24 & 13.86 & 30.48 & 7.64 & faint, bow like shock & …\
932A & 21:02:03.5 & +52:20:07 & 30.35 & 69.70 & 8.06 & complex group of knots & …\
932B & 21:02:02.6 & +52:20:06 & 25.09 & 59.49 & 8.37 & diffuse & extended & …\
932C & 21:02:02.2 & +52:19:53 & 4.87 & 11.35 & 8.20 & faint knot & …\
933A & 21:02:09.9 & +52:28:17 & 9.38 & 19.69 & 7.19 & bright shock & …\
933B & 21:02:17.7 & +52:27:23 & 4.30 & 10.24 & 8.41 & faint, bow-like & …\
934 & 21:02:10.7 & +52:35:57 & 13.95 & 15.23 & 0.85 & pair of bow shocks & HH 978\
935A & 21:02:08.3 & +52:29:32 & 2.12 & 3.57 & 5.04 & faint & diffuse & …\
935B & 21:02:11.8 & +52:30:38 & 2.10 & 3.00 & 3.47 & faint bow shock & …\
936 & 21:02:21.7 & +52:26:09 & 28.46 & 65.84 & 8.13 & bright group of knots & …\
Multi-waveband data of the sources {#sec:multisource}
==================================
The driving sources of the MHOs listed in Table\[tab:mhos\] are presented in Table\[tab:sources\]. Here we list the appropriate IDs from the 2MASS, AKARI/IRC, MSX6C, AKARI/FIS, IRAS and CSO 1.1mm [@aspin:2011] catalogues. Table\[tab:photom\] lists the near to mid-infrared photometric magnitudes and colour indices for the same set of outflow sources (see also Figs.\[fig:ccdjhhk\] and \[fig:ccdmir\]).
[lcccccc]{} Source & 2MASS & AKARI/IRC & MSX6C & AKARI/FIS & IRAS & CSO 1.1mm\
Name & ID & ID & ID & ID & ID & ID\
\
Z20566+5213 & … & … & … & … & Z20566+5213 & …\
V2494Cyg & 20582109+5229277 & 2058211+522927 & G091.6383+04.4007 & 2058198+522930 & I20568+5217 & G091.638+04.398 (\#37)\
I20573+5221 & 20585009+5232543 & 2058500+523255 & G091.7301+04.3831 & 2058498+523312 & I20573+5221 & G091.741+04.377 (\#47)\
CN5 & 20590419+5221448 & … & … & … & … & …\
core \#44 & … & … & … & 2059087+523221 & … & G091.742+04.338 (\#44)\
I20575+5210 & … & … & … & 2059066+522228 & I20575+5210 & G091.626+04.234 (\#18)\
CN4 & 20590895+5222392 & … & … & … & … & …\
CN6N & 20594000+5234361 & 2059400+523436 & … & … & R20581+5222 & …\
CN6(core \#51) & 20594071+5234135 & 2059408+523414 & G091.8313+04.2995 & 2059430+523355 & R20581+5222 & G091.838+04.341 (\#51)\
R20582+5221 & 20594619+5233216 & 2059462+523322 & G091.8296+04.2799 & … & R20582+5221 & …\
I20583+5228 & 20595184+5240205 & 2059518+524020 & G091.9269+04.3452 & 2059513+524021 & I20583+5228 & G091.926+04.343 (\#54)\
CN3N & 21000376+5234290 & 2100038+523430 & G091.8730+04.2583 & … & I20585+5222 & …\
Cyg 19 & 21001159+5218172 & … & … & 2100124+521831 & … & G091.689+04.064 (\#7)\
CN2 & 21001656+5226230 & … & … & … & … & …\
CN8 & 21001903+5227281 & 2100191+522728 & … & … & … & …\
IRAS 15N & 21002140+5227094 & 2100215+522710 & … & 2100217+522712 & I20588+5215 & G091.808+04.142 (\#30)\
I20588+5221 & 21002143+5222570 & 2100215+522258 & G091.7575+04.0988 & … & I20588+5221 & G091.759+04.106 (\#20)\
V2495 Cyg & … & 2100253+523017 & … & 2100249+523018 & … & G091.861+04.172 (\#39)\
CN1 & 21003517+5233244 & 2100352+523324 & … & … & I20590+5221 & …\
core \#33 & … & 2100388+522757 & … & 2100387+522753 & … & G091.855+04.119 (\#33)\
IRAS 14 & 21004237+5226007 & 2100423+522600 & … & 2100422+522552 & I20591+5214 & G091.835+04.087 (\#24)\
21015977+5220127 & 21015977+5220127 & 2101598+522013 & G091.8861+03.8801 & … & … & …\
I21005+5217 & 21020547+5228544 & 2102055+522854 & G092.0055+03.9642 & 2102042+522858 & I21005+5217 & …\
HD 200594 & 21022391+5234328 & … & … & … & … & …\
[lcccccccccc]{} Source & J & H & K & S9W & L18W & J - H & H - K & J - K & K - S9W & K - L18W\
Name & \[mag\] & \[mag\] & \[mag\] & \[mag\] & \[mag\] & \[mag\] & \[mag\] & \[mag\] & \[mag\] & \[mag\]\
\
Z20566+5213 & **17.30 $\pm$0.03** & **15.94 $\pm$0.03** & **15.14 $\pm$0.03** & … & … & 1.37$\pm$0.04 & 0.79$\pm$0.04 & 2.16$\pm$0.04 & … & …\
V2494Cyg & 11.54$\pm$0.03 & 9.81$\pm$0.03 & 8.31$\pm$0.02 & 2.02$\pm$0.50 & -0.72$\pm$0.54 & 1.73$\pm$0.04 & 1.51$\pm$0.03 & 3.24$\pm$0.04 & 6.28$\pm$0.50 & 9.63$\pm$0.60\
I20573+5221 & 13.62$\pm$0.03 & 11.30$\pm$0.02 & 9.73$\pm$0.02 & 6.22$\pm$0.03 & 3.37$\pm$0.08 & 2.32$\pm$0.03 & 1.57$\pm$0.03 & 3.89$\pm$0.03 & 3.51$\pm$0.04 & 6.37$\pm$0.08\
CN5 & 14.49$\pm$0.04 & 13.08$\pm$0.03 & 12.19$\pm$0.03 & … & … & 1.42$\pm$0.04 & 0.89$\pm$0.04 & 2.30$\pm$0.05 & … & …\
core \#44 & … & … & … & … & … & … & … & … & … & …\
I20575+5210 & … & … & … & … & … & … & … & … & … & …\
CN4 & 13.28$\pm$0.03 & 12.05$\pm$0.02 & 11.32$\pm$0.03 & … & … & 1.23$\pm$0.03 & 0.73$\pm$0.03 & 1.96$\pm$0.04 & … & …\
CN6N & 14.57$\pm$0.03 & 10.61$\pm$0.02 & 8.66$\pm$0.02 & 7.04$\pm$0.01 & … & 3.95$\pm$0.04 & 1.95$\pm$0.03 & 5.90$\pm$0.04 & 1.63$\pm$0.02 & …\
CN6(core \#51) & 15.21$\pm$0.06 & 13.03$\pm$0.03 & 11.32$\pm$0.03 & 5.99$\pm$0.02 & 3.66$\pm$0.04 & 2.18$\pm$0.07 & 1.71$\pm$0.04 & 3.89$\pm$0.07 & 5.33$\pm$0.04 & 7.66$\pm$0.05\
R20582+5221 & 13.34$\pm$0.02 & 11.94$\pm$0.02 & 11.07$\pm$0.02 & 6.58$\pm$0.02 & 3.86$\pm$0.04 & 1.40$\pm$0.03 & 0.87$\pm$0.03 & 2.27$\pm$0.03 & 4.49$\pm$0.03 & 7.23$\pm$0.05\
I20583+5228 & 14.48$\pm$0.04 & 12.29$\pm$0.02 & 10.97$\pm$0.02 & 6.17$\pm$0.03 & 3.24$\pm$0.07 & 2.19$\pm$0.04 & 1.34$\pm$0.03 & 3.52$\pm$0.04 & 4.80$\pm$0.03 & 7.73$\pm$0.07\
CN3N & 13.32$\pm$0.03 & 11.26$\pm$0.02 & 9.99$\pm$0.02 & 6.03$\pm$0.02 & 4.10$\pm$0.07 & 2.06$\pm$0.03 & 1.27$\pm$0.03 & 3.33$\pm$0.03 & 3.96$\pm$0.03 & 5.89$\pm$0.08\
Cyg 19 & 11.38$\pm$0.02 & 10.48$\pm$0.02 & 10.02$\pm$0.02 & … & … & 0.91$\pm$0.03 & 0.46$\pm$0.02 & 1.37$\pm$0.03 & … & …\
CN2 & 12.60$\pm$0.02 & 11.47$\pm$0.02 & 10.67$\pm$0.02 & … & … & 1.13$\pm$0.03 & 0.80$\pm$0.03 & 1.93$\pm$0.03 & … & …\
CN8 & 11.69$\pm$0.02 & 10.63$\pm$0.02 & 9.81$\pm$0.02 & 5.85$\pm$0.05 & 3.38$\pm$0.12 & 1.06$\pm$0.03 & 0.82$\pm$0.03 & 1.88$\pm$0.03 & 3.96$\pm$0.05 & 6.43$\pm$0.12\
IRAS 15N & 11.15$\pm$0.03 & 10.23$\pm$0.03 & 9.40$\pm$0.04 & 4.02$\pm$0.11 & 1.16$\pm$1.38 & 0.94$\pm$0.04 & 0.82$\pm$0.05 & 1.75$\pm$0.05 & 5.38$\pm$0.11 & 8.24$\pm$1.38\
I20588+5221 & **20.96$\pm$0.50** & 16.92$\pm$0.05 & 14.03$\pm$0.04 & 6.10$\pm$0.01 & 3.83$\pm$0.05 & 4.04$\pm$0.50 & 2.89$\pm$0.07 & 6.93$\pm$0.50 & 7.93$\pm$0.04 & 10.20$\pm$0.07\
V2495Cyg & 13.57$\pm$0.02 & 11.48$\pm$0.02 & 10.29$\pm$0.02 & 4.66$\pm$0.03 & 1.64$\pm$0.15 & 2.09$\pm$0.03 & 1.20$\pm$0.03 & 3.28$\pm$0.03 & 5.63$\pm$0.03 & 8.65$\pm$0.15\
CN1 & 15.27$\pm$0.06 & 13.86$\pm$0.04 & 12.52$\pm$0.03 & … & 4.22$\pm$0.08 & 1.41$\pm$0.07 & 1.34$\pm$0.05 & 2.75$\pm$0.07 & … & 8.30$\pm$0.08\
core \#33 & **21.94$\pm$0.50** & **21.21$\pm$0.50** & 15.25$\pm$0.02 & 7.01$\pm$0.01 & 4.34$\pm$0.04 & 0.73$\pm$0.71 & 5.95$\pm$0.50 & 6.69$\pm$0.50 & 8.24$\pm$0.02 & 10.91$\pm$0.04\
IRAS 14 & **20.43$\pm$0.50** & 16.91$\pm$0.02 & 14.22$\pm$0.09 & … & 4.62$\pm$0.12 & 3.52$\pm$0.50 & 2.69$\pm$0.09 & 6.21$\pm$0.51 & … & 9.60$\pm$0.15\
21015977+5220127 & 12.05$\pm$0.02 & 9.17$\pm$0.02 & 7.79$\pm$0.02 & 6.57$\pm$0.01 & … & 2.88$\pm$0.03 & 1.37$\pm$0.03 & 4.26$\pm$0.03 & 1.22$\pm$0.03 & …\
I21005+5217 & 13.46$\pm$0.02 & 11.70$\pm$0.02 & 10.52$\pm$0.02 & 4.73$\pm$0.06 & 1.77$\pm$0.41 & 1.76$\pm$0.03 & 1.18$\pm$0.03 & 2.94$\pm$0.03 & 5.79$\pm$0.06 & 8.75$\pm$0.41\
HD 200594 & 8.67$\pm$0.03 & 8.70$\pm$0.02 & 8.69$\pm$0.02 & … & … & -0.03$\pm$0.04 & 0.01$\pm$0.03 & -0.03$\pm$0.03 & … & …\
Individual Outflow Regions {#sec:outfldet}
==========================
{width="16cm"}
IRAS 20566+5217 (V2494 Cyg) region
----------------------------------
Figure\[fig:v2494cyg\] presents the immediate surroundings of IRAS20568+5217 (HH 381 IRS), which was suggested as the driving source of several Herbig-Haro (HH) objects [@devine:1997]. IRAS20568+5217 is also associated with a conical reflection nebula and has been shown to host an FUOri type eruptive variable star [@aspin:2009]. This lead to the designation [@kazarovets:2011]. Our near-infrared colour-colour analysis (Fig.\[fig:ccdjhhk\]) confirms the very young stellar nature of V2494Cyg.
An optical bipolar outflow (HH 965) has also been reported about 3 arcminutes to the south-west of V2494Cyg [@magakian:2010]. An embedded star found midway between the bow shocks that comprise HH965 has been proposed as the driving source; the IRAS HiRes-processed data reveals a 25$\mu$m peak at the position of this source (Fig.\[fig:v2494cyg\]right panel), which is referred to as Z20566+5213 in the IRAS faint source reject catalogue [@moshir:2008]. The near-infrared colours of this object (Fig.\[fig:ccdjhhk\]) are consistent with an embedded CTTS, perhaps even a low-mass pre-main-sequence (PMS) star. This would explain the non-detection of the source in the mid-infrared. We identify Z20566+5213 as the driving source of the HH965 outflow.
There are several other HH knots and bow shocks observed in the close proximity of V2494Cyg (Fig.\[fig:v2494cyg\]left panel). While HH381C belongs to the MHO900-904 north-south bipolar outflow (Table\[tab:outflows\]), HH381A and B are likely being driven by a source situated in the north-east [@magakian:2010].
HH 380A region
--------------
{width="17cm"}
Figure\[fig:hh380region\] shows the region around HH380A and B, which were previously thought to belong to a single NE-SW outflow originating from V2494Cyg (known at that time as HH381 IRS) [@devine:1997]. Recently, however, @magakian:2010 detected additional HH objects which support the existence of a number of outflows and therefore multiple driving sources (also theorised by @devine:1997). Our near-infrared data reveal numerous additional outflow features which, in conjunction with our multi-waveband data analysis, leads to a clear picture of the situation in this Figure.
appears to be the driving source of a bipolar outflow evident as MHO906 on one side and HH968 on the other (Fig.\[fig:hh380region\]). The HH968 lobe may extend as far as HH381A and B (shown in Fig.\[fig:v2494cyg\]). is identified as an embedded CTTS in our colour-colour analysis (Fig.\[fig:ccdjhhk\]); it also coincides with the CSO 1.1mm core \#47 [@aspin:2011]. This core is part of an extended dust continuum emission structure that connects with core \#44. Both cores are only evident in far-infrared and millimetre wave data (Appendix\[sec:multisource\]). Core \#44 coincides with an extended IRAS 100$\mu$m emission seen in the background (as red on Fig.\[fig:hh380region\]right panel) and appears to be driving a 1.4pc-long bipolar outflow comprising MHO907, 909 and 910A. By contrast, the IRAS25 and 60$\mu$m emission peaks, labelled in Fig.\[fig:hh380region\] as I20575+5218 and R20573+5219[^6], are situated on the outskirts of core \#44. This positional discrepancy is most likely the cause of the R20573+5219 source rejection. Careful inspection suggests that the source R20573+5219 may be connected with the yet unidentified 1.1mm sub-core (not labeled) in \#44 extended structure which can be clearly seen on the Fig.\[fig:hh380region\].
The region also contains several outflow features which also deserve mentioning. HH969 resembles a bow-shock which appears to be driven from a source associated with core \#44 or one of the IRAS peaks (I20575+5218 or R20573+5219). MHO905 (cf. Appendix\[sec:mhodetails\]) is most likely the terminating bow of an outflow driven from the SW. Finally, MHO910B and 910C are aligned with HH968 and therefore may be associated with IRAS20573+5221. This could be explained with a strong precession and/or possible existence of binary component and therefore would support the original assumption of NE-SW outflow by @devine:1997.
CN4 and CN5 region
------------------
{width="17cm"}
Figure\[fig:cn4and5region\] shows the area that includes the CN4 and CN5 cometary nebulae, as well as several HH objects discovered recently by @magakian:2010. Both nebulae have been suggested as the driving sources of the HH objects. Their near-infrared colours suggest that they are mildly embedded CTTS objects (Fig.\[fig:ccdjhhk\]), although further spectroscopic study is needed further clarify their true nature. Based on the near-infrared H$_2$ 1-0 S(1) line observations and multicolour photometry presented in this paper, we are able to suggest an alternative scenario.
The area is host to a prominent IRAS source, (Fig.\[fig:cn4and5region\]right panel). IRAS20575+5210 also coincides with the CSO 1.1mm core \#18 [@aspin:2011], which encompasses both CN4 and CN5. @magakian:2010 suggest that CN4 is the driving source of and , but the most likely candidate appears to be IRAS20575+5210, which is only detected at far-infrared and millimetre wavelengths (Appendix\[sec:multisource\]). In fact, this source appears to be driving a bipolar outflow consisting of MHO903, 908 and HH974 (Fig.\[fig:cn4and5region\]).
The same can be said about CN5 which was originally thought to be the driving source of [@magakian:2010]. However, our analysis suggests that HH973, together with and , comprise yet another bipolar outflow (Fig.\[fig:cn4and5region\], Table\[fig:outflows\]) that is driven by IRAS20575+5210. It is likely that we are dealing with a multiple protostellar system embedded in a cold dust cloud identified as IRAS20575+5210.
MHO 911
-------
{width="18cm"}
Figure\[fig:hh627region\] shows the region around MHO911 and the optical knots that comprise , which were first detected by @movsessian:2003. The overall bow-shock shape of MHO911 suggests that it is driven by a source situated to the NW, where the CSO 1.1mm core \#51 is located [@aspin:2011]. Core \#51 appears to be associated with the 60$\mu$m IRAS emission feature R20581+5222; core \#51 also peaks 10-20 to the SE of the cometary nebula CN6. CN6 was reported to host an embedded CTTS [@aspin:2009]; our colour-colour analysis confirms this interpretation (Fig.\[fig:ccdjhhk\]). We therefore identify CN6 as the driving source of MHO911 (HH627) [@magakian:2010]. CN6N is not thought to be associated with MHO911, nor with R20581+5222: our colour analysis suggests that it is a background source, possibly an early-M type giant star (Fig.\[fig:ccdjhhk\]).
Identifying driving sources for the other shock features in Figure\[fig:hh627region\] is more difficult. IRASR20582+5221 coincides with the 2MASS source 20594619+5233216, which has the colours of an embedded CTTS (it is labelled R20582+5221 on Fig.\[fig:ccdjhhk\]). This object could therefore be associated with some of the HH knots. Based on close inspection of the HH morphologies, we suggest that at least HH627C and D are driven by R20582+5221. The position of HH627B suggests that it could also be driven by R20582+5221, although CN6 is also a candidate if HH627B and MHO911 (HH627A) are parts of the same shock front.
MHO 913
-------
{width="17cm"}
Figure\[fig:mho913region\] shows a new 0.2pc-long bipolar outflow originating from , which coincides with the CSO 1.1mm core \#54. The NW lobe of this bipolar outflow has been detected in the optical and labelled [@magakian:2010], while the SW counter-lobe has only been observed in the near-infrared. Our colour-colour analysis confirms the YSO nature of (Fig.\[fig:ccdjhhk\]), which is clearly the driving source of this outflow.
Braid (V2495 Cyg) region {#sec:braid}
------------------------
{width="17cm"}
The centre of our survey field (cf. Fig.\[fig:field-overview\]) has been studied previously by @movsessian:2003, although incomplete coverage in H$_2$ 1-0 S(1) emission limited their ability to identify outflows and their driving sources. Here, with the aid of wider-field near-IR observations and archival photometric data, we are more successful in understanding the situation.
Figure\[fig:braidregion\] shows the immediate vicinity of the Braid Nebula overlaid with CSO 1.1mm emission contours [@aspin:2011]. The 1.1mm data clearly outline the densest regions (the cores) which most likely host the driving sources of the numerous outflows detected.
The Braid Nebula star, which coincides with core \#39 and a faint IRAS HiRes source, is identified as an FU Ori type outburst star [@movsessian:2006]. It has recently received the designation [@kazarovets:2011]. drives a bipolar outflow that is traced by in the NE and in the SW. The apparent asymmetry of the bipolar outflow is most likely caused by the presence of dense, cold dust to the NE (Fig.\[fig:braidregion\]).
As can be seen from Fig.\[fig:braidregion\], one of the most prominent sources in the region is (IRAS15), which coincides with the CSO 1.1mm core \#30. Since the IRAS emission associated with this source is quite extended, it encompasses several sources which we will discuss separately for the sake of clarity. Optical and near-infrared observation reveal two stars (IRAS 15N and IRAS 15S) in the vicinity of the IRAS error ellipse. IRAS15N was spectroscopically studied by @aspin:2009 who concluded that it is a highly active accreting CTTS with a significant K-band thermal excess. Our analysis suggest that IRAS 15N is driving at least one bipolar outflow spanning from MHO914 to 923 (, ). IRAS15N might be responsible for two other bipolar outflows, traced by MHO920 to and by MHO921 to 919, as shown in Fig.\[fig:braidregion\]. IRAS15S, by contrast, was found to be a foreground object. A near-IR spectrum obtained toward IRAS15S does contain H$_2$ emission [@aspin:2009]; we suggest that this could be caused by the superimposition of outflow features emanated from IRAS15N.
The CN2 and CN8 cometary nebulae are situated within the extent of IRAS15 (cf. Fig.\[fig:braidregion\]). Our colour-colour analysis indicates that both are CTTSs (Fig.\[fig:ccdjhhk\]). @magakian:2010 suggest that CN2 drives the outflow traced by MHO917 and . This seems likely given the positional placement of the detected outflow features. There is no mid-infrared emission detected towards CN2, though this could be due to the AKARI/IRC detection limits (50mJy $\sim$ 7.6 mag at 9$\mu$m). Near-IR spectroscopic data presented by @aspin:2009 suggests that at one stage CN8 drew wide-angle molecular outflow [@magakian:2010] suggesting a different scenario for the MHO919 origin.
The area presented in Fig.\[fig:braidregion\] is also host to a prominent optical and near-infrared flow, MHO926 (). MHO926 consists of a chain of well-defined bows connecting with MHO923A and B [@movsessian:2003]. It seems clear that the bipolar outflow MHO926 to 923A,B is being powered by a source associated with the 1.1mm core \#33. This driving source is detected in the AKARI/IRC and AKARI/FIS catalogues (Appendix\[sec:multisource\]). Moreover, the near-IR colours of this object (J - H = 6.09 and H - K = 5.95; not shown on Fig.\[fig:ccdjhhk\]) indicate that it is deeply embedded. It is interesting to note that the MHO923/926 outflow appears to terminate in the outskirts of the core that hosts V2495Cyg (core \#39). This could simply be due to increased extinction as the flow drills into or passes behind core \#39.
There are several other monopolar flows in the area which deserve mentioned. (IRAS 14) drives a short flow represented by MHO925 () [@movsessian:2003]. The source itself has the typical colours of a ClassII YSO or possibly a ClassI protostar.
or the associated cometary nebula CN1 was classified as an accreting CTTS star [@aspin:2009] which drives [@magakian:2010]. Unfortunately we did not detect any near-infrared H$_2$ 1-0 S(1) line features associated with this outflow, although our colour analysis does confirm the YSO nature of CN1 (Fig.\[fig:ccdjhhk\]).
Finally, the monopolar flow, , is driven by an embedded CTTS object, CN3N ().
Cyg 19 region
-------------
{width="17cm"}
Figure\[fig:cyg19region\] shows the area around Cyg 19, an H$\alpha$ star first reported by @melikian:1996. Our near-infrared H$_2$ line survey revealed a 2.3pc-long (Table\[tab:outflows\]) bipolar outflow comprising MHO912, 915 and 922. Each MHO represents a chain of bows and arcs. Cyg19 is situated on the axis that defines the lobe and counter-lobe of this bipolar outflow. It could be the driving source of this flow, although its near-infrared colours and spectroscopy [@aspin:2009] suggest that it is a mildly embedded dwarf star. The presence of curving nebulosity around Cyg19 indicates an outflow cavity seen close to pole-on that is illuminated by scattered light. This nebulosity, together with the detection of H$\alpha$ emission [@melikian:1996], indicates that Cyg19 could be a sporadically accreting YSO [@aspin:2009]. Although the CSO 1.1mm core \#7 does not coincide exactly with Cyg19, there is faint extended IRAS emission towards this source. The former could be due to the positional uncertainty of the CSO 1.1mm data [@aspin:2011], or the 1.1mm data could indicate the true location of the MHO912/915/922 bipolar outflow driving source.
About 4 arc-minutes north we identify a faint H$_2$ feature, MHO918 (Fig.\[fig:cyg19region\]), which could be driven from either CSO 1.1mm core \#14 or core \#20 [@aspin:2011]. Core \#20 is perhaps the most likely source, since it coincides with . There is also a star in the centre of core \#20 detected in the near- and mid-infrared with colours typical of a heavily embedded protostar (possibly a ClassI source; Fig.\[fig:ccdjhhk\]).
IRAS 21005+5217 region
----------------------
{width="17cm"}
Figure\[fig:mho928region\] illustrates the area containing MHO928, 929, 930, 933 and 936. Our analysis suggest that there are two bipolar, almost perpendicular outflows emanating from . One spans from MHO930 to 935 while the other includes MHO933 and 928. It is possible that the NW side of the second flow also contains MHO929 if this outflow is precessing (Table\[tab:outflows\]). Our near-infrared colour-colour analysis (Fig.\[fig:ccdjhhk\]) suggests that is an embedded CTTS or possibly a younger object. This source is prominent in the IRAS HiRes 100$\mu$m data (Fig.\[fig:mho928region\]). However, there is no CSO 1.1mm core associated with IRAS 21005+5217 [within the 3$\sigma$ detection limit @aspin:2011]. This may be explained by an absence of dust and gas, due to the presence of a high energy intermediate or high mass source.
There are two other 1.1mm cores in Fig.\[fig:mho928region\], which could be the driving sources of MHO936. The location and the overall morphology of MHO936 suggests that it has been driven from core \#26.
MHO 931 and 932
---------------
{width="17cm"}
Figure\[fig:mho932region\] shows the region where MHO931 and 932 are located. The morphology of these objects suggests different outflow directions as indicated by the arrows. MHO931 might originate from a source to the north-west, while MHO932 might be driven from the south-west. The bright star 2MASS21015977+5220127 evident in this figure has no apparent morphological feature which might suggest that it is the driving source of the objects. Moreover, our colour-colour analysis suggests that it is a background source (Fig.\[fig:ccdjhhk\]). The presence of these two MHOs – 931 and 932 – in close proximity could be explained by their encounter with the dense environment associated with CSO 1.1mm core \#9.
MHO 934
-------
{width="8.5cm"}
MHO934 (Fig.\[fig:mho934\]) is situated in an area of our surveyed field where we lack complete coverage in all optical bands (Fig.\[fig:field-overview\]). Never-the-less, it is associated with [@magakian:2010]. The overall morphology of this bow shock suggests a driving source to the SE, where is located. However, the near-infrared colours of this source indicate that it is a main sequence star (Fig.\[fig:ccdjhhk\]). It is therefore unlikely to be the driving source of the MHO934 bow shock.
Details of the detected MHOs {#sec:mhodetails}
============================
[p[101mm]{}p[60mm]{}]{}
\
Images & Description\
\
Images & Description\
{width="10cm"} & Area including MHO900. Despite the overall resemblance to an edge-on disk system with a bipolar outflow cavity we were unable to identify any IRAS or AKARI sources here. The system is most likely a broken bow-shock driven from V2494Cyg.\
{width="10cm"} & Area including the MHO901 complex coinciding with the optical HH382G, F and E knots.\
{width="10cm"} & Area including the MHO902 knots which coincide with the optical HH382A, B and C knots.\
{width="10cm"} & This sub field includes MHO903 which is rather diffuse in structure.\
{width="10cm"} & The area shows the MHO904 knots which belong to the outflow emanated from V2494Cyg. These are the most southern knots discovered in our survey.\
{width="10cm"} & MHO905 is a small bow-shock, the origin of which is still unknown.\
{width="10cm"} & This is one of the knots in the MHO906 outflow. This feature is associated with HH380F.\
{width="10cm"} & Part of the MHO906 outflow coinciding with HH380B.\
{width="10cm"} & Last part of the MHO906 outflow coinciding with the optical feature HH380C. Morphologically it resembles a bow-shock driven from the South-East. In this current work we assume an outflow direction to the South-West.\
{width="10cm"} & Area includes the MHO907 complex bow shock which coincides with the faint object HH970. IRAS20575+5218 is unrelated to this flow.\
{width="10cm"} & Region including the MHO908 chain of knots A to D, where knot D might be related to HH974B. The IRAS20575+5210 error ellipse and CN4 are marked for reference.\
{width="10cm"} & Area shows a chain of relatively faint knots comprising MHO909.\
{width="10cm"} & Area shows the details of MHO910, which is associated with the prominent optical bow-shock HH380(A). There is a faint extension to the East-North-East (MHO910B) which could be unrelated to this flow. MHO910C also coincides with HH380E.\
{width="10cm"} & Region where the MHO911 bow-shock can be seen. This quite prominent and compact bow also coincides with HH627A.\
{width="10cm"} & Figure shows the complex bow-shock structure MHO912, which is part of a prominent bipolar outflow that is only detected in the near-infrared.\
{width="10cm"} & Area including the compact bipolar outflow MHO913, emanating from IRAS20583+5228. Knots A and B correspond to HH975A and B.\
{width="10cm"} & Figure shows the complex bow-shock structure of MHO914.\
{width="10cm"} & Area including the MHO915 chain of knots emanating from Cyg19. These are part of a prominent near-infrared bipolar outflow.\
{width="10cm"} & Region including the faint knot MHO916 which coincides with HH629 and emanates from V2495Cyg.\
{width="10cm"} & The compact knot MHO917 coinciding with HH670.\
{width="10cm"} & The faint diffuse bow-shock MHO918.\
{width="10cm"} & MHO919 knots also coinciding with the HH631 knots D and E.\
{width="10cm"} & Area including MHO920 and 921 which is also full of HH objects, some coinciding with the near-infrared features. The IRAS20588+5215 (IRAS15) error ellipse is shown, as is the position of CN2.\
{width="10cm"} & Area including the extensive and rather complex chain of bow-shocks MHO922, which is part of a near-infrared bipolar outflow.\
{width="10cm"} & Region showing the complex object MHO923, which coincides with HH448 and is also known as RNO127. MHO926A, which coincides with HH634A, can also be seen in this image.\
{width="10cm"} & Area shows the MHO924 bright knot which coincides with HH635A.\
{width="10cm"} & Area shows MHO925 which coincides with HH633.\
{width="10cm"} & Area shows the MHO926 outflow, which also coincides with the optical HH634 outflow.\
{width="10cm"} & Region shows the MHO927 group of knots and bow-shocks which coincide with HH635B and C. This is part of the flow driven by V2495Cyg.\
{width="10cm"} & Group of bows and knots emanating from IRAS21005+5217. MHO928 and 929 are thought to be the part of a West-to-East or East-to-South bipolar flow. MHO930 is part of a bipolar outflow extending in a SW-NE direction.\
{width="10cm"} & Area including MHO932 and 931. These two objects are thought to belong to different flows.\
{width="10cm"} & Region shows the MHO933 knots which are thought to be driven by IRAS21005+5217. MHO933 belongs to the same bipolar outflow as MHO928 and 929.\
{width="10cm"} & The area shows the MHO934 chain of bow-shocks which are thought to be driven by a source somewhere in the SE.\
{width="10cm"} & Region shows MHO935 which is driven by IRAS21005+5217. MHO935 belongs to the same bipolar outflow as MHO930.\
{width="10cm"} & Area shows MHO936 which has quite a complex structure. It is thought to be driven by a source somewhere in the North-East.\
[^1]: UKIRT is operated by the Joint Astronomy Centre on behalf of the Science and Technology Facilities Council of the U.K.
[^2]: WSA is a part of the Wide Field Astronomy Unit (WFAU) hosted by the Institute for Astronomy at the Royal Observatory, Edinburgh, UK
[^3]: HiRes uses the Maximum Correlation Method [MCM, @aumann:1990] to produce images with better than the nominal resolution of the IRAS data.
[^4]: <http://www.jach.hawaii.edu/UKIRT/MHCat/> [@davis:2010]
[^5]: The detailed description of our WFCAM near-infrared broad-band dataset will be presented elsewhere, but for the current work we used the catalogue in a few cases to obtain better estimates of the near-infrared photometric measurements or limiting magnitudes for J and H bands.
[^6]: From the IRAS point source reject catalogue - @infrared-astronomical-satellite-iras-catalogs:2007
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'Fork-join network is a class of queueing networks with applications in manufactory, healthcare and computation systems. In this paper, we develop a simulation algorithm that (1) generates i.i.d. samples of the job sojourn time, jointly with the number of waiting tasks, exactly following the steady-state distribution, and (2) unbiased estimators of the derivatives of the job sojourn time with respect to the service rates of the servers in the network. The algorithm is designed based on the Coupling from the Past (CFTP) and Infinitesimal Perturbation Analysis (IPA) techniques. Two numerical examples are reported, including the special 2-station case where analytic results on the steady-state distribution is known and a 10-station network with a bottleneck.'
address:
- 'Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430072, China'
- 'Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA'
author:
- Xinyun Chen
- Xianjun Shi
title: 'Perfect Sampling and Gradient Simulation for Fork-Join Networks'
---
Perfect Sampling,Gradient Estimation,Queueing Networks
Introduction
============
A fork-join network is a special type of queueing networks. When a *job* arrives at the network, it splits into several parts, which we call the *tasks*, to be served in different service stations. After being served, the tasks join together again to form the output. This step is usually called synchronization of the tasks. There are two types of synchronization: exchangeable synchronization(ES) and non-exchangeable synchronization (NES). In our paper, we shall focus on fork-join networks with NES, which we shall explain in one moment. For the definition and examples of ES fork-join network, please see [@Pang16] and the references therein.
In an NES fork-join network, each task is tagged with the job it comes from and can get synchronized only when all the other tasks from the same job have been served. Such type of networks have many application in healthcare and parallel computing system (see [@Pang16] and the references therein). For example, in the Map-Reduce scheduling [@DG04], a large data set (job) is splitted into several small sets (tasks). The tasks are processed in different servers, and then the computing results of the tasks are sent to a single server to form the final output of the job. As each job contains different data, tasks from different jobs can not be mixed up. Another example is the procedure of diagnosis [@AIMMT15]. A doctor may ask one patient to do several medical examinations. The results of all the examinations must be ready before the doctor can make the diagnosis. Besides, the results from different patients can not be mixed up.
In this paper, we consider a fundamental NES model where the number of service station and the number of tasks in each job are both equal to a constant $K$. Two important performance measures of such networks are the job sojourn time, that is from the arrival time of the job to the time when all its tasks got synchronized, and the number of tasks waiting in the system. Both of them are random variables and their steady-state distribution depict the long-run performance of the system. Unfortunately, even for this fundamental model, there is no analytic result on the steady-state distribution except for the very special case when the system is Markovian and has only 2 stations [@FH84; @NT93]. Moreover, in engineering problems such as optimal allocation of the service resource, one also needs to know the sensitivities of the performance measures with respect to the model parameters.
We shall deal with these performance measure and sensitivity analysis problems using the perfect-sampling technique. In particular, under mild condition, we develop an algorithm that can generate i.i.d. sample following exactly the steady-state (joint) distribution of the job sojourn time and the number of waiting tasks in the fork-join network. In addition, the algorithm generates unbiased estimators of the derivatives of the mean job sojourn time with respect to the service rates of the stations.
Our work is closely related to the recently growing literature on the perfect-sampling algorithms for queues and queueing networks [@BC14; @BDGP15; @CK14; @MT06; @S12]. In [@BC14], the authors develop a perfect-sampling algorithm for the virtual waiting time of stochastic fluid networks. We use their algorithm to simulate the job sojourn time and extend it to the number of waiting tasks. The gradient simulation part is based on the IPA approach developed in [@G92].
The rest of paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we give the mathematic description of the model. Section 3 gives detailed explanation and the proofs of the algorithm. Numerical results are reported in Section 4.
Notation, Model and Problem Setting
===================================
Through out the paper, we shall use boldface to represent a vector in $\mathbb{R}^K$ for some $K\geq 2$. For example, $\mathbf{J}=(J_1, J_2,...,J_K)$ is a vector in $\mathbb{R}^K$ and $J_k$ is the $k$-th component of $\mathbf{J}$. $\mathbf{1}=(1,1,...,1)\in \mathbb{R}^K$ and $\mathbf{e}^k$ represents the vector in $\mathbb{R}^K$ whose $k$-th component equals to 1 and all other components are 0.
We consider a fork-join network with $K$ parallel service stations indexed as station 1 to station $K$. Jobs arrive according to some renewal process with i.i.d. inter-arrival times $\{I(n)\}$, i.e., $I(n)$ is the time between the arrival of the $n-1$-th and $n$-th job. Upon arrival, each job split into $K$ tasks and the $k$-th task is sent to and will be processed by service station $k$. We shall denote the $k$-th task from the $n$-th job as $T_k(n)$. Let $J_{k}(n)$ be the service requirement (or time) of $T_{k}(n)$. For fixed $n$, $J_{k}(n)$ can be correlated and follow different distributions, but the sequence of random vectors $\{\mathbf{J}(n)\}$ are i.i.d. in $\mathbb{R}^K$. Besides, $\{I(n)\}$ and $\{\mathbf{J}(n)\}$ are independent. After they finish service, tasks will join a “unsynchronized queue" until all the other tasks from the same job finish service. Once upon the last task finishes service, the $K$ tasks from the same job will get synchronized and the job leaves the system immediately.
It is known in [@PJ89] that when $\max_k E[J_{k}(n)]<E[I(n)]$, the fork-join network is stable and its workload process has a unique stationary distribution. So are the sojourn time of each job and the total number of waiting tasks in the system. Our goal is to develop algorithms to generate i.i.d. samples following exactly the stationary (joint) distribution of the job sojourn time and the number of waiting tasks in the system, and to generate unbiased estimators for the derivatives of the mean job sojourn time with respect to the service rates of the stations.
In the rest of the paper we shall impose the following assumptions:\
**Assumptions**\
(A1) $\max_k E[J_{k}(n)]<E[I(n)]$ so that the system is stable.\
(A2) There exists $\theta_k>0$ for $k=1,2,...,K$ such that $E[\exp(\sum_k \theta_kJ_{k}(n))]<\infty$.
Algorithm Description
=====================
Perfect sampling for the job sojourn time
-----------------------------------------
Recall that $T_{k}(n)$ is the $k$-th task from the $n$-th job. Let $\{W_{k}(n)\}$ be the waiting time of task $T_{k}(n)$ before entering service at station $k$. Then we have $$\label{eq:W}
W_{k}(n)=(W_{k}(n-1)+J_{k}(n-1)-I(n))^+,$$ and the total sojourn time of task $T_{k}(n)$ at station $k$ is $$S_{k}(n)=W_{k}(n)+J_{k}(n).$$ In other words, the $k$-th task will enter the unsynchronized queue $S_{k}(n)$ units of time after the job enter the system. Since there is no synchronization time in our setting, the job will leave the system immediately once all its $K$ tasks enter the unsynchronized queue. Therefore, the total sojourn time of the $n$-th job is simply $$S(n)=\max_{1\leq k\leq K}S_{k}(n).$$
Let $\mathbf{W}(n)=(W_1(n),...,W_K(n))$. Then, following , $\{\mathbf{W}(n)\}$ is a Markov process in $\mathbb{R}^K$. In [@BC14], the authors construct a stationary version of $\{\mathbf{W}^*(-n)\}_{n\geq 0}$ *backward in time* that is expressed as the difference of a random walk and its maximum in the future. In detail, for all $n\geq 0$ $$\mathbf{W}^*(-n)=\mathbf{M}(n)-\mathbf{R}(n),$$ where $\mathbf{R}(n)$ is a random walk in $\mathbb{R}^K$ such that $$\mathbf{R}(n)=\mathbf{R}(n-1)+\mathbf{J}(n)-I(n)\mathbf{1}, \mathbf{R}(0)=0.$$ And, $$\mathbf{M}(n)=\max_{m\geq n}\mathbf{R}(n),$$ where the maximum is taken component by component.\
Using Algorithm 4 in [@BC14], we can simulate i.i.d. sample paths of $\{\mathbf{W}^*(n)\}_{n=-N}^0$ for any $N<\infty$. In particular, $\mathbf{W}^*(0)$ follows the stationary distribution of the task waiting time. Let $\mathbf{J}(0)$ follows the distribution of $\mathbf{J}$ and is independent of $\{\mathbf{R}(n)\}_{n\geq 1}$, representing the job requirement of the 0-th job. Then, $$S^*(0)=\max_{1\leq k\leq K}(W^*_{k}(0)+J_{k}(0))$$ is the sojourn time of the 0-th job in the stationary sample path, and therefore follows the stationary distribution of the job sojourn time in the fork-join system.\
Perfect sampling for the number of tasks
----------------------------------------
From the discrete sequence of $\{\mathbf{W}^*(n)\}_{n\leq 0}$, we can derive a stationary sample path the fork-join system in continuous time. In the first step, we replace $I(1)$ with $I^*(1)$ following the equilibrium distribution of $I(n)$. Let $A(-n)=-\sum_{m=1}^n I(i)$. Then the sample path of the fork join system in continuous time is as follows. The $n$-th job *in the past* arrive at time $A(-n)$ and brings tasks with service requirement $\mathbf{J}(n)$ to the system and its sojourn time is $S^*(-n)$ and each of its task at the k-th service station waits $W^*_{k}(-n)$ units of time before entering service.
Now we show how to compute the number of tasks in the system using the sample path information. At time $t$, let $Q_k(t)$ be the number of tasks in the $k$-th service station, including the one in service, and $D_k(t)$ be the number of tasks in the $k$-th unsynchronized queue. Then, $Q_k(t)$ and $D_k(t)$ can be expressed as:
$$\begin{aligned}
\begin{cases}
Q_k(t)=&\sum_{n\geq 1}1(A(-n)+W^*_{k}(-n)+J_{k}(n)>t\\&\text{ and }A(-n)<t),\\
D_k(t)=&\sum_{n\geq 1}1(A(-n)+W^*_{k}(-n)+J_{k}(n)<t\\
& \text{ and }A(-n)+S^*(-n)>t).
\end{cases}\end{aligned}$$
As the service is under a FCFS discipline, $A(-n)+W^*_{k}(-n)+J_{k}(n)$ is strictly decreasing in $n$ and goes to $-\infty$ as $n\to\infty$. So we will eventually see $A(-N)+W^*_{k}(-N)+J_{k}(N)<0$ for all $k$ at some finite $N$ and then we have
$$\begin{cases}\label{eq: QD}Q_k(0)=&\sum_{n=1}^{N}1(A(-n)+W^*_{k}(-n)+J_{k}(n)>0)\\
D_k(0)=&\sum_{n=1}^{N}1(A(-n)+W^*_{k}(-n)+J_{k}(n)<0\\&\text{ and }
A(-n)+S^*(-n)>0).\end{cases}$$
In other words, we just need to simulate $\{\mathbf{W}^*(n)\}$ backwards in time until $n=N$ such that $A(-N)+W^*_{k}(-N)+J_{k}(N)<0$ for all $k$ (and hence $A(-N)+S^*(-N)<0$) and stop. Then, we compute $Q_k(0)$ and $D_k(0)$ according to , which jointly follow the stationary distribution of the number of tasks in service stations and in the unsynchronized queues.
Gradient simulation
-------------------
In some engineering problem, we want to know the impact of the service resource allocation among different stations on the mean sojourn time of jobs. This requires a sensitivity analysis of the job sojourn time with respect to the the service capacity of each station. In order to represent the service capacity mathematically, we introduce $\mu_k$ as the “service rate" of service station $k$ for all $k=1,2,...,K$, such that the service time of a task with service requirement of $J_{k}(n)$ at station $k$ is $J_{k}(n)/\mu_k$. Under this new setting, the stability condition (A1) now becomes: $$\begin{array}{lc}
\text{(A3) } &\max _{1\leq k\leq K} E[J_{k}(n)/\mu_k] < E[I(n)],
\end{array}$$which we shall impose throughout this section.
The sensitivity analysis involves computing the derivatives $\frac{\partial E[S^*(0)]}{\partial \mu_k}$ for all $k=1,2,...,K$. In this section, we shall develop a simulation algorithm generating i.i.d. samples from some random vector $\mathbf{H}^*=(H^*_1,...H^*_K)$, such that $E[H^*_k]=\frac{\partial E[S^*(0)]}{\partial \mu_k}$ for all $1\leq k\leq K$.
Suppose that $\mathbf{W}^*(\boldsymbol{\mu})$ follows the stationary distribution of $\mathbf{W}(n)$ under the service rate vector $\boldsymbol{\mu}=(\mu_1,...,\mu_K)$. Suppose $\mathbf{J}(0)$ follows the job requirement distribution and is independent of $\mathbf{W}^*(\boldsymbol{\mu})$, then
$$S^*(\boldsymbol{\mu}; 0) = \max_{1\leq k\leq K}(W^*_{k}(\boldsymbol{\mu})+J_{k}(0)/\mu_k)\doteq f(\mathbf{W}^*(\boldsymbol{\mu}), \mathbf{J}(0), \boldsymbol{\mu}),$$
follows the stationary distribution of the job sojourn time under the service rate vector $\boldsymbol{\mu}$.
Suppose now we have a stationary version of $\{\mathbf{W}^*(n)\}_{n\leq 0}$ as generated in Section 3.1. For each $k$, define $\tau_k=\max\{n: W^*_{k}(n)=0\}>-\infty$ w.p.1 given Assumption (A3). The following result gives our construction of the gradient estimator. To simplify the expression, we define $$h(\mathbf{W}, \mathbf{J}, \boldsymbol{\mu}) \doteq \operatorname*{arg\,max}_{1\leq l\leq K} W_{l}+J_{l}/\mu_l.$$
\[thm\] For all $1\leq k\leq K$:
1. $$V_k^*=-\sum_{n=1}^{-\tau_k}\frac{J_{k}(n)}{\mu_k^2}$$ is an unbiased estimator of $\frac{\partial W^*_k(0)}{\partial \mu_k}$ such that $E[V^*_k]=\frac{\partial W^*_k(0)}{\partial \mu_k}<\infty$.
2. $$\label{eq: H}H^*_k\doteq1(k=h(\mathbf{W}^*(0), \mathbf{J}(0), \boldsymbol{\mu}) )\left(V^*_k-\frac{J_{k}(0)}{\mu_k^2}\right)$$
is an unbiased estimator for $\frac{\partial E[S^*(\boldsymbol{\mu}; 0)]}{\partial \mu_k}$.
**Remark:** Under the assumption that $J_{k}(n)$ are continuous random variables,
$P(|\operatorname*{arg\,max}_{1\leq k\leq K} (W_{k}^*(0)+J_{k}(0)/\mu_k) |~ >1)=0$
, so
$1(k=h(\mathbf{W}^*(0), \mathbf{J}(0), \boldsymbol{\mu}))$
is well defined w.p.1.)
Since the tasks are served independently with no feedback, for each $k$, $\{W_{k}(n)\}$ is itself a Markov process in $\mathbb{R}$ satisfying the recursion:
$$\begin{aligned}
W^*_{k}(n) &=& (W^*_{k}(n-1)+J_{k}(n-1)/ \mu_k-I(n))^+\\
&\doteq&\phi(W^*_{k}(n-1),\mu_k).\end{aligned}$$
Applying the IPA results in [@G92],
$$\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}\left(\prod_{i = n-j}^{n-1} \frac{\partial\phi}{\partial W}(W^*_{k}(i),\mu_k)\right)\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial \mu}(W^*_{k}(n-j-1),\mu_k)$$
is an unbiased estimator if this infinity sum is well-defined. We can compute that $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{\partial\phi}{\partial W}(W^*_{k}(n),\mu_k)&=1(W^*_{k}(n+1)>0),\\
\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial \mu}(W^*_{k}(n),\mu_k)&=-1(W^*_{k}(n+1)>0)\frac{J_{k}(-n)}{\mu_k^2}.\end{aligned}$$ Under Assumptions (A3), $\tau_k=\max\{n: W^*_{k}(n)=0\}<0$. Therefore, the infinity sum is well-defined and equal to $$-\sum_{n=\tau_k}^{0}\frac{J_{k}(n)}{\mu_k^2}\doteq V_k^*,$$ which is an unbiased estimator for $\frac{\partial W^*_k(0)}{\partial \mu_k}$.
Besides, the IPA construction also indicates a family of $\{\mathbf{W}^*(\boldsymbol{\eta}; 0):\boldsymbol{\eta}\in (\boldsymbol{\mu}-\delta\mathbf{1},\boldsymbol{\mu}+\delta\mathbf{1})\}_{n\leq 0}$, for some $\delta>0$ small enough, that are coupled such that for each $1\leq k\leq K$, $$\frac{W^*_{k}(\mu_k+\theta; 0)-W^*_{k}(\mu_k; 0)}{\theta}\to V^*_k, \text{w.p.1 as }\theta\to 0$$ in the $\sigma$-field generated by $\{I(n), \mathbf{J}^*(n)\}_{n\leq 0}$. Now we consider such a family of $\{\mathbf{W}^*(\boldsymbol{\eta}; 0):\boldsymbol{\eta}\in (\boldsymbol{\mu}-\delta\mathbf{1},\boldsymbol{\mu}+\delta\mathbf{1})\}$. By definition,
$$\begin{aligned}
&\frac{\partial E[S^*(\boldsymbol{\mu};0)]}{\partial \mu_k}\\
=&\lim_{\theta\to 0}\frac{E[f(\mathbf{W}^*(\boldsymbol{\mu}+\theta\cdot \mathbf{e}^k; 0), \mathbf{J}(0),\boldsymbol{\mu}+\theta\cdot \mathbf{e}^k)]-E[f(\mathbf{W}^*(\boldsymbol{\mu}; 0), \mathbf{J}(0), \boldsymbol{\mu})]}{\theta}.\end{aligned}$$
As $E[J_k],$ $E[\mathbf{W}^*(\boldsymbol{\mu}; 0)]$, $E[\mathbf{W}^*(\boldsymbol{\mu}+\theta\cdot \mathbf{e}^k; 0)]<\infty$, we have
$$\begin{aligned}
\label{error}
&\frac{E[f(\mathbf{W}^*(\boldsymbol{\mu}+\theta\cdot \mathbf{e}^k; 0), \mathbf{J}(0),\boldsymbol{\mu}+\theta\cdot \mathbf{e}^k)]-E[f(\mathbf{W}^*(\boldsymbol{\mu}; 0), \mathbf{J}(0), \boldsymbol{\mu})]}{\theta}\nonumber\\
=&E\left[1(k=h(\mathbf{W}^*(0), \mathbf{J}(0), \boldsymbol{\mu}))\left\{\left[\frac{W_{k}^*(\mu_k+\theta; 0)-W_{k}^*(\mu_k; 0)}{\theta}\right.\right.\right.\nonumber\\
&\left.\left.\left.+\frac{\frac{J_k(0)}{\mu_k+\theta}-\frac{J_k(0)}{\mu_k}}{\theta}\right]+\sum_{j\neq k}1(j=h(\mathbf{W}^*(0), \mathbf{J}(0), \boldsymbol{\mu}+\theta\cdot \boldsymbol{e}^k))\right.\right.\nonumber\\
&\left.\left.\cdot\left[\frac{W^*_{j}(\mu_j; 0)-W_{k}^*(\mu_k+\theta; 0)}{\theta}+\frac{\frac{J_j(0)}{\mu_j}-\frac{J_k(0)}{\mu_k+\theta}}{\theta}\right]\right\}\right]\end{aligned}$$
Since $\theta\to 0$, we get
$$P(k=h(\mathbf{W}^*(0), \mathbf{J}(0), \boldsymbol{\mu})\text{ and }k\neq h(\mathbf{W}^*(0), \mathbf{J}(0), \boldsymbol{\mu}+\theta\cdot \boldsymbol{e}^k))\to 0.$$
As
$E[J_k(0)], E[\mathbf{W}^*(\boldsymbol{\mu}; 0)], E[\mathbf{W}^*(\boldsymbol{\mu}+\theta\cdot \mathbf{e}^k; 0)]<\infty$,
we conclude that the expectation of the terms in goes to 0 as $\theta\to 0$ by the dominance convergence theorem. On the other hand, we have
$$\frac{W_{k}^*(\mu_k+\theta; 0)-W_{k}^*(\mu_k; 0)}{\theta}\to V^*_k \text{ and }\frac{\frac{J_k(0)}{\mu_k+\theta}-\frac{J_k(0)}{\mu_k}}{\theta}\to -\frac{J_k(0)}{\mu_k^2}.$$
By the dominance convergence theorem, we conclude that
$$\begin{aligned}
&\frac{E[f(\mathbf{W}^*(\boldsymbol{\mu}+\theta\cdot \mathbf{e}^k; 0), \mathbf{J}(0),\boldsymbol{\mu}+\theta\cdot \mathbf{e}^k)]-E[f(\mathbf{W}^*(\boldsymbol{\mu}; 0), \mathbf{J}(0), \boldsymbol{\mu})]}{\theta} \\
\rightarrow~&E\left[1(k=h(\mathbf{W}^*(0), \mathbf{J}(0), \boldsymbol{\mu}))\left(V^*_k-\frac{J_{k}(0)}{\mu_k^2}\right)\right].\end{aligned}$$
We close this section by summarizing the algorithm:
**Algorithm: Perfect sampling and gradient simulation for FJQ**
1\. Simulate $\{\mathbf{W}(-n)^*\}_{n\geq 0}$ backwards in time jointly with i.i.d. sequences $\{\mathbf{J}(n)\}$ and $\{I(n)\}$ until $n=N$ such that for all $k=1,2,..,K$, $A(-N)+W^*_{k}(-N)+J_{k}(N)=0$.
2\. For $0\leq n\leq N$, compute $S^*(-n)=\max_{1\leq k\leq K} (W^*_{k}(-n)+J_{k}(n))$.
3\. Compute $Q_k(0)$ and $D_k(0)$ according to
4\. Let $k_0=\operatorname*{arg\,max}_{1\leq l\leq K} (W^*_{l}(0)+J_{l}(0)/\mu_l)$. Get the value of $\tau_{k_0}=\max\{n: W^*_{k_0}(n)=0\}$. (One can check that $\tau_k\geq -N$ for all $k$.) Compute a vector $(\mathbf{H}^*)_{1\leq k\leq K}$ according to .
5\. Output $S^*(0)$, $(Q_k(0), D_k(0))_{k=1}^K$ and $\mathbf{H}^*$.
Numerical Experiments
=====================
We implement the algorithm in MATLAB performed on a PC with an Intel Core i7-4790 CPU 3.60GHz, 16.00 GB of RAM. We first test the correctness of the algorithm by simulating a simple 2-station example where some analytic results on the stationary distributions are available. Then we simulate a 10-station example illustrating the efficiency of the algorithm.
The 2-station case
------------------
We consider a 2-station example where jobs arrive according to a Poisson process of rate $\lambda=1$. Job requirements $J_{1}(n)$ and $J_{2}(n)$ are independent and following an exponential distribution of rate $\mu$. In this simple case, the stationary expectation of the job sojourn time $S^*(0)$ and the number of unsynchronized tasks in the system $D^*(0)$ have closed form expressions as given in [@NT93] and [@FH84]:
$$\label{es}
E[S^*(0)] = \frac{12\mu - \lambda}{8\mu(\mu-\lambda)}\text{ and } E[D^*(0)] = \frac{\lambda(4\mu-\lambda)}{4\mu(\mu-\lambda)}.$$
$\mu$ 1.8000 1.4000 1.1000 1.0600
------------------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- --------------------
$1-\rho$ 0.4444 0.2857 0.0909 0.0566
True E\[$S^*(0)$\] 1.7882 3.5268 13.8636 23.0346
Simulated E\[$S^*(0)$\] 1.7901$\pm$0.0279 3.5094$\pm$0.0555 14.0178$\pm$0.2218 23.2005$\pm$0.3674
True E\[$D^*(0)]$ 1.0764 2.0536 7.7273 12.7358
Simulated E\[$D^*(0)$\] 1.0756$\pm$0.0275 2.0396$\pm$0.0483 7.8104$\pm$0.1697 12.9087$\pm$0.2796
Running time(s) 3.3032 5.1520 37.5992 134.9230
$\mu$ 1.8000 1.4000 1.1000 1.0600
--------------------------------------------- -------------------- -------------------- ---------------------- -----------------------
$1-\rho$ 0.4444 0.2857 0.0909 0.0566
True $\partial E[S^*(0)]/\partial \mu$ -2.1870 -8.6575 -137.6033 -382.0557
Simulated $\partial E[S^*(0)]/\partial \mu$ -2.1964$\pm$0.0527 -8.5430$\pm$0.2147 -136.4920$\pm$3.8702 -376.8422$\pm$10.6424
Running time(s) 4.6017 6.9625 50.4201 144.9027
Table 1 compares the simulation estimations, the true values of $E[S^*(0)]$ and $E[D^*(0)]$ for variety of $\mu$. For each $\mu$, we do 10000 round of simulation algorithm and the total running time is also reported in Table 1. To test the performance of our algorithm in heavy traffic, we let $1-\rho = 1- \lambda/\mu$ approach 0.
To test the validity of simulated $95\%$ CI, we simulated 1000 independent $95\%$ CIs for $S^*(0)$ and $D^*(0)$ when $\mu= 1.4$. For each CI, we generated 10000 independent sample paths. Out of the 1000 CIs, 956 cover the true value 3.5268($S^*(0)$) and 2.0536($D^*(0)$), which indicates that our estimator is unbiased.
Then we implement the gradient simulation algorithm to estimate $\frac{\partial E[S^*(0)]}{\partial\mu_1}$ and $\frac{\partial E[S^*(0)]}{\partial \mu_2}$. In the special case where the distribution of the service times at the two stations follows two independent exponentials with the same rate $\mu$ (i.e. $J_i\sim \exp(1)$ for $i = 1, 2$ and the service rate is $\mu$), using we get an explicit expression for $\frac{\partial E[S^*(0)]}{\partial\mu}$: $$\frac{\partial E[S^*(0)]}{\partial\mu} = \frac{2\lambda\mu - \lambda^2-12\mu^2}{8\mu^2(\mu-\lambda)^2},$$
Since $\mu_1 = \mu_2 = \mu$, we have $$\frac{\partial E[S^*(0)]}{\partial\mu} = \frac{\partial E[S^*(0)]}{\partial \mu_1}+\frac{\partial E[S^*(0)]}{\partial \mu_2}.$$ Recall that $H^*_1$ and $H^*_2$ are the unbiased estimators for $\frac{\partial E[S^*(0)]}{\partial\mu_1}$ and $\frac{\partial E[S^*(0)]}{\partial\mu_2}$ generated by our algorithm. Then, $H^*_1+H^*_2$ should be an unbiased estimator for $\frac{\partial E[S^*(0)]}{\partial\mu}$. Table 2 compares the simulation estimations and the true values of $\frac{\partial E[S^*(0)]}{\partial\mu}$ for a variety values of $\mu$. For each $\mu$, we do 10000 round of simulation algorithm and the total running time is also reported in Table 2.
We test the validity of simulated $95\%$ CI by simulating 1000 independent $95\%$ CIs for $\partial E[S^*(0)]/\partial\mu$ when $\mu = 1.8$, whose theoretical value is -2.1870. Each $95\%$ CI is generated by sampling 10000 independent sample paths. Out of the 1000 CIs, 954 of them cover the true value, which shows the validity of our CIs.
### K=10
We implement the case where jobs arrive according to a Poisson process of rate 1 and $\{J_{k}(n)\}$ are independently exponentially distributed of rate $\mu_k=2-0.05k$ for $1\leq k \leq 10$. In this example, Station 10 is a “bottleneck” as its service rate is the smallest and the 10-th task is likely to be last to finish among all the tasks. Using our algorithm, we first estimate $E[S^*(0)]$ and $E[D_k^*(0)]$ for $1\leq k\leq 10$ based on 10000 independent round of simulation. The simulation estimation and the CI’s are reported in Table 3. From the simulation results, we can see that the unsynchronized queue corresponding to station 10 ($E[D_k^*(0)]$) is the shortest.
Table 4 reports the gradient simulation results. From the estimated derivative, we can also see that station 10 is the bottleneck station in the sense that $E[S^*(0)]$ is mostly sensitive to service rate $\mu_{10}$.\
**Acknowledgement**
This paper is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.CMMI 1538102.
[1]{}
Armony, M., S. Israelit, A. Mandelbaum, Y. N. Marmor, Y. Tseytlin and G. B. Yom-Tov. Patient flow in hospitals: A data-based queueing-science perspective. *Stochastic Systems*, 5(1), 2015.
Blanchet J. and X. Chen. Steady-state simulation of reflected Brownian motion and related stochastic networks. *The Annals of Applied Probability*, 25(6):3209-3250, 2015.
Busic A, S. Durand , B. Gaujal and F. Perronnin. Perfect sampling of Jackson queueing networks. *Queueing Systems,* 80(3):1-38, 2015.
Connor S. B. and W. S. Kendall. Perfect simulation of M/G/c queues. *Advances in Applied Probability*, 47(4) 2014.
Dean J. and S. Ghemawat. MapReduce: Simplified data processing on large clusters. *Communications of the ACM*, 51(1):107-113, 2008.
Flatto, L. and S. Hanh. Two parallel queues created by arrivals with two demands I. *SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics*, 44(10):1041-1053, 1984.
Glasserman P. Stationary waiting time deriatives. *Queueing Systems*, 12: 369-390, 1992.
Lu, H. and G. Pang. Gaussian limits for a fork-join network with non-exchangeable synchronization in heavy traffic. *Mathematics of Operations Research*, forthcoming.
Konstantopoulos P. and J. Walrand. Stationary and stability of fork-join networks. *Journal of Applied Probability,* 26 (3): 604-614, 1989.
Murdoch D. J. and G. Takahara. Perfect sampling for queues and network models. *ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation,* 16: 76-92, 2006.
Nelson, R. and A. N. Tantawi. Approximate analysis of fork/join synchronization in parallel queues. *IEEE Transactions on Computers*, 37(6):739-743, 1993.
Sigman. K. Exact simulation of the stationary distribution of the FIFO M/G/c queue: The general case for $\rho<c$. *Queueing Systems,* 70:37-43, 2012.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'Stimulated by the newly discovered $\Omega(2012)$ resonance at Belle II, in this work we have studied the OZI allowed strong decays of the low-lying $1P$- and $1D$-wave $\Omega$ baryons within the $^{3}P_{0}$ model. It is found that $\Omega(2012)$ is most likely to be a $1P$-wave $\Omega$ state with $J^P=3/2^{-}$. We also find that the $\Omega(2250)$ state could be assigned as a $1D$-wave state with $J^{P}=5/2^{+}$. The other missing $1P$- and $1D$-wave $\Omega$ baryons may have large potentials to be observed in their main decay channels.'
author:
- 'Zuo-Yun Wang$^{1}$'
- 'Long-Cheng Gui$^{1,2,3}$'
- 'Qi-Fang L[ü]{}$^{1,2,3}$'
- 'Li-Ye Xiao$^{4,5}$'
- 'Xian-Hui Zhong$^{1,2,3}$'
title: 'Newly observed $\Omega(2012)$ state and strong decays of the low-lying $\Omega$ excitations '
---
\[sec:level1\]INTRODUCTION
==========================
The study of hadron spectrum is an important way for us to understand strong interactions. For the baryon spectra, the classification based on $SU(3)_{f}$ flavor symmetry has been achieved a great success. The $\Omega$ hyperon as a member of baryon decuplet in the quark model was unambiguously discovered in both production and decay at BNL about one half century ago [@Barnes:1964pd]. More excited $\Omega$ baryons should exist as well according to $SU(6)\times O(3)$ symmetry. In theory, the mass spectrum of $\Omega$ hyperon has been predicted within many models, such as the Skyrme model [@Oh2007a], various constituent quark models [@CapstickSimonandIsgur1986; @Faustov2015; @LoringUlrichandMetschBernardC.andPetry2001; @LiuJianglaiandMcKeownRobertD.andRamsey-Musolf2007; @ChaoKuang-TaandIsgurNathanandKarl1981a; @ChenYanandMa2009a; @AnC.S.andMetschB.Ch.andZou2013; @AnC.S.andZou2014; @HayneCameronandIsgur1982; @PervinMuslemaandRoberts2008], the lattice gauge theory [@EngelGeorgP.andLangC.B.andMohlerDanielandSchafer2013; @Liang2015], and so on. However, in experiments there are only a few information of the excited $\Omega$ baryons. In the review of particle physics from the Particle Data Group (PDG), except for the ground state $\Omega(1672)$, only three possible excited $\Omega$ baryons are listed: $\Omega(2250)$, $\Omega(2380)$, and $\Omega(2470)$ [@Patrignani2016]. Their nature is still rather uncertain with three- or two-star ratings. Fortunately, the Belle II experiments offer a great opportunity for our study of the $\Omega$ spectrum.
Very recently, a candidate of excited $\Omega$ baryon, $\Omega(2012)$, was observed by the Belle II collaboration [@Yelton2018]. The measured mass and width are $$\begin{aligned}
M&=&2012.4\pm0.7(\textrm{stat})\pm0.6(\textrm{syst})\textrm{ MeV} \nonumber,\\
\Gamma &=& 6.4_{-2.0}^{+2.5}(\textrm{stat})\pm1.6(\textrm{syst})\textrm{ MeV}, \nonumber\end{aligned}$$ respectively. In various quark models [@CapstickSimonandIsgur1986; @Faustov2015; @LoringUlrichandMetschBernardC.andPetry2001; @LiuJianglaiandMcKeownRobertD.andRamsey-Musolf2007; @ChaoKuang-TaandIsgurNathanandKarl1981a; @ChenYanandMa2009a; @AnC.S.andMetschB.Ch.andZou2013; @AnC.S.andZou2014; @HayneCameronandIsgur1982; @PervinMuslemaandRoberts2008], the masses of the first orbital ($1P$) excitations of $\Omega$ states are predicted to be $\sim 2.0$ GeV. The newly observed state $\Omega(2012)$ may be a good candidate of the $1P$-wave $\Omega$ state. Recently, to study the possible interpretation of $\Omega(2012)$, its strong decays were calculated with the chiral quark model [@Xiao2018a], where it was shown that $\Omega(2012)$ could be assigned to the spin-parity $J^{P}=3/2^{-}$ $1P$-wave state. However, the spin-parity $J^{P}=1/2^{-}$ state can’t be completely ruled out. Furthermore, the mass and strong decay patten of $\Omega(2012)$ also were studied by QCD sum rule [@AlievT.M.andAziziK.andSaracY.andSundu2018; @Aliev2018]. As its mass is very close to $\Xi(1530)K$ threshold, there is also some work considered it as a $J^{P}=3/2^{-}$ $K\Xi^{*}$ molecular state [@Valderrama2018; @R.Pavao2018; @Lin2018], or a dynamically generated state [@Huang2012]. In Ref. [@Polyakov2012], by a flavor $SU(3)$ analysis the authors suggested $\Omega(2012)$ to be a number of $3/2^{-}$ decuplet baryon if the sum of branching ratios for the decay $\Omega(2012)\to\Xi\bar{K}\pi$, $\Omega^{-}\pi\pi$ is not too large ($\leqslant70\%$).
In present work, to further reveal the nature of $\Omega(2012)$ and better understand the properties of the excited $\Omega$ states, we study the Okubo-Zweig-Iizuka(OZI) allowed two-body strong decays of the $1P$- and $1D$-wave baryons with the widely used $^{3}P_{0}$ model. The quark model classification for the $1P$- and $1D$-wave $\Omega$ baryons and their theoretical masses are listed in Table \[tab:table-1\]. The spatial wave functions for the $\Omega$ baryons are described by harmonic oscillators. According to our calculations, we find that (i) the newly observed $\Omega(2012)$ resonance is most likely to be the $1P$-wave $\Omega$ state with spin-parity $J^P=3/2^-$ and the experimental data can be reasonably described. The other $1P$-wave state with $J^P=1/2^-$ might be broader state with a width of dozens of MeV. The $^{3}P_{0}$ results are consistent with the recent predictions of the chiral quark model [@Xiao2018a]. (ii) The $\Omega(2250)$ resonance listed in PDG may be a good candidate of the $J^P=5/2^+$ $1D$ wave state $|56,^410,2,2,5/2^+\rangle$ or $|70,^{2}10,2,2,5/2^{+}\rangle $. Although the widths of the $D$-wave states predicted within the $^{3}P_{0}$ model are systematically larger that those predicted with the chiral quark model [@Xiao2018a], these states may be observed in their main decay channels in future experiments for their relatively narrow width.
This paper is organized as follows. Firstly, We give a brief review of the $^{3}P_{0}$ model in Sec. II. Secondly, we present the numerical results of strong decay of $1P$- and $1D$-wave $\Omega$ baryon in Sec. III. Finally, a summary of our results is given in Sec. IV.
---- --------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ------------------------------ ------------ ------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------
States Wave function [@Faustov2015] [@CapstickSimonandIsgur1986] [@Oh2007a] [@ChaoKuang-TaandIsgurNathanandKarl1981a] [@EngelGeorgP.andLangC.B.andMohlerDanielandSchafer2013]
1S $\left|56,^{4}10,0,0,3/2^{+}\right\rangle $ $\phi^{s}\chi^{s}\psi_{000}^{s}$ $1678$ $1635$ $1694$ $1675$ $1642(17)$
1P $\left|70,^{2}10,1,1,1/2^{-}\right\rangle $ $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\phi^{s}\chi^{\rho}\psi_{11L_{z}}^{\rho}+\phi^{s}\chi^{\lambda}\psi_{11L_{z}}^{\lambda}\right)$ $1941$ $1950$ $1837$ $2020$ $1944(56)$
$\left|70,^{2}10,1,1,3/2^{-}\right\rangle $ $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\phi^{s}\chi^{\rho}\psi_{11L_{z}}^{\rho}+\phi^{s}\chi^{\lambda}\psi_{11L_{z}}^{\lambda}\right)$ $2038$ $2000$ $1978$ $2020$ $2049(32)$
1D $\left|56,^{4}10,2,2,1/2^{+}\right\rangle $ $\phi^{s}\chi^{s}\psi_{22L_{z}}^{s}$ $2301$ $2255$ $2140$ $2210$ $2350(63)/2481(51)$
$\left|56,^{4}10,2,2,3/2^{+}\right\rangle $ $\phi^{s}\chi^{s}\psi_{22L_{z}}^{s}$ $2173/2304$ $2280$ $2282$ $2215$
$\left|70,^{2}10,2,2,3/2^{+}\right\rangle $ $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\phi^{s}\chi^{\rho}\psi_{22L_{z}}^{\rho}+\phi^{s}\chi^{\lambda}\psi_{22L_{z}}^{\lambda}\right)$ $2173/2304$ $2345$ $2282$ $2265$
$\left|56,^{4}10,2,2,5/2^{+}\right\rangle $ $\phi^{s}\chi^{s}\psi_{22L_{z}}^{s}$ $2401$ $2280$ $\cdots$ $2225$
$\left|70,^{2}10,2,2,5/2^{+}\right\rangle $ $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\phi^{s}\chi^{\rho}\psi_{22L_{z}}^{\rho}+\phi^{s}\chi^{\lambda}\psi_{22L_{z}}^{\lambda}\right)$ $2401$ $2345$ $\cdots$ $2265$
$\left|56,^{4}10,2,2,7/2^{+}\right\rangle $ $\phi^{s}\chi^{s}\psi_{22L_{z}}^{s}$ $2332$ $2295$ $\cdots$ $2210$
---- --------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ------------------------------ ------------ ------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------
THE $^{3}P_{0}$ MODEL
======================
The $^{3}P_{0}$ model, is also called the quark pair creation (QPC) model. It was first proposed by Micu [@Micu1969], Carlitz and Kislinger [@CarlitzRobertD.andKislinger1970], and developed by the Orsay group and Yaouanc et al [@LeYaouancA.andOliverL.andPeneO.andRaynal1974; @LeYaouancA.andOliverL.andPeneO.andRaynal1975; @LeYaouancA.andOliverL.andPeneO.andRaynal1977a; @LeYaouancA.andOliverL.andPeneO.andRaynal1977; @LeYaouancA.andOliverL.andPeneO.andRaynal1988; @LeYaouanc1973]. In the model, it assumes that a pair of quarks $q\bar{q}$ is created from the vacuum with $J^{PC}=0^{++}(^{2S+1}L_{J}={}^{3}P_{0})$ when the initial hadron A decays, and the quarks from the hadron A regroups with the created quarks form two daughter hadrons B and C. For baryon decays, two quarks of the initial baryon regroups with the created quark to form a daughter baryon, and the remaining one quark regroup with the created antiquark to form a meson. The process of baryon decays is shown in Fig. 1.
The transition operator under the $^{3}P_{0}$ model is written as
$$\begin{aligned}
T & = & -3\gamma\underset{m}{\sum}\langle1m;1-m|00\rangle\int d^{3}\vec{p}_{4}d^{3}\vec{p}_{5}\delta^{3}(\vec{p}_{4}+\vec{p}_{5})\nonumber \\
& & \times\mathcal{Y}_{1}^{m}(\frac{\vec{p}_{4}-\vec{p}_{5}}{2})\chi_{1,-m}^{45}\varphi_{0}^{45}\omega_{0}^{45}b_{4i}^{\dagger}(\vec{p}_{4})d_{5j}^{\dagger}(\vec{p}_{5}),\end{aligned}$$
where the pair-strength $\gamma$ is a dimensionless parameter, $i$ and $j$ are the color indices of the created quark $\ensuremath{q_{4}}$ and antiquark $\ensuremath{\bar{q}_{5}}$. $\ensuremath{\varphi_{0}^{45}=(u\bar{u}+d\bar{d}+s\bar{s})/\sqrt{3}}$ and $\ensuremath{\omega_{0}^{45}=\delta_{ij}}$ stand for the flavor and color singlet, respectively. $\ensuremath{\chi_{1,-m}^{45}}$ is the spin triplet state and $\ensuremath{\mathcal{Y}_{1}^{m}(\vec{p})\equiv\left|\vec{p}\right|Y_{1}^{m}(\theta_{p},\phi_{p})}$ is a solid harmonic polynomial corresponding to the $P$-wave quark pair. $b_{4i}^{\dagger}(\vec{p}_{4})d_{5j}^{\dagger}(\vec{p}_{5})$ denotes the creation operator in the vacuum.
According to the definition of the mock state [@HayneCameronandIsgur1982], the baryons A and B, and meson C are defined as follows : $$\begin{aligned}
& & \left|A(n_{A}^{2S_{A}+1}L_{A(J_{A},M_{J_{A}})})(\vec{P}_{A})\right\rangle \nonumber \\
& = & \sqrt{2E_{A}}\underset{M_{L_{A}},M_{S_{A}}}{\sum}\langle L_{A}M_{L_{A}};S_{A}M_{S_{A}}|J_{A}M_{J_{A}}\rangle\nonumber \\
& & \times\int\delta^{3}(\vec{p}_{1}+\vec{p}_{2}+\vec{p}_{3}-\vec{P}_{A})d^{3}\vec{p}_{1}d^{3}\vec{p}_{2}d^{3}\vec{p}_{3}\nonumber \\
& & \times\Psi_{n_{A}L_{A}M_{L_{A}}}(\vec{p}_{1},\vec{p}_{2},\vec{p}_{3})\chi_{S_{A}M_{S_{A}}}^{123}\varphi_{A}^{123}\omega_{A}^{123}\nonumber \\
& & \times\left|q_{1}(\vec{p}_{1})q_{2}(\vec{p}_{2})q_{3}(\vec{p}_{3})\right\rangle,\end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}
& & \left|B(n_{B}^{2S_{B}+1}L_{B(J_{B}M_{J_{B}})})(\vec{P}_{B})\right\rangle \nonumber \\
& = & \sqrt{2E_{B}}\sum_{M_{L_{B}}M_{S_{B}}}\langle L_{B}M_{L_{B}};S_{B}M_{S_{B}}|J_{B}M_{J_{B}}\rangle \nonumber \\
& & \times \int\delta^{3}(\vec{p}_{1}+\vec{p}_{2}+\vec{p}_{4}-\vec{P}_{B})d^{3}\vec{p}_{1}d^{3}\vec{p}_{2}d^{3}\vec{p}_{4}\nonumber \\
& & \times\Psi_{n_{B}L_{B}M_{L_{B}}}(\vec{p}_{1},\vec{p}_{2},\vec{p}_{4})\chi_{S_{B}M_{S_{B}}}^{124}\varphi_{B}^{124}\omega_{B}^{124}\nonumber \\
& & \times \left|q_{1}(\vec{p}_{1})q_{2}(\vec{p}_{2})q_{4}(\vec{p}_{4})\right\rangle ,\end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}
& & \left|C(n_{C}^{2S_{C}+1}L_{C(J_{C},M_{J_{C}})})(\vec{P}_{C})\right\rangle \nonumber \\
& = & \sqrt{2E_{C}}\underset{M_{L_{C}},M_{S_{C}}}{\sum}\langle L_{C}M_{L_{C}};S_{C}M_{S_{C}}|J_{C}M_{J_{C}}\rangle\nonumber \\
& & \times\int\delta^{3}(\vec{p}_{3}+\vec{p}_{5}-\vec{P}_{C})d^{3}\vec{p}_{3}d^{3}\vec{p}_{5}\nonumber \\
& & \times\Psi_{n_{C}L_{C}M_{L_{C}}}(\vec{p}_{3},\vec{p}_{5})\chi_{S_{C}M_{S_{C}}}^{35}\nonumber \\
& & \times\varphi_{C}^{35}\omega_{C}^{35}\left|q_{3}(\vec{p}_{3})q_{5}(\vec{p}_{5})\right\rangle,\end{aligned}$$
where the subscripts 1,2,3 denote the quarks of the initial baryon $A$. 1,2 and 4 denote the quarks of the final baryon $B$, 3 and 5 stand for the quark and antiquark of the final meson $C$, respectively. $\vec{p}_{i}(i=1,2,3)$ are the momentum of quarks in baryon $A$. $\vec{p}_{i}(i=1,2,4)$ are the momentum of quarks in baryon $B$. $\vec{p}_{3}$ and $\vec{p}_{5}$ are the momentum of the quark and antiquark in meson $C$. $\vec{P}_{A},\vec{P}_B,\vec{P}_C$ denotes the momentum of state A,B,C. $S_{A},S_{B},S_C$ and $J_{A},J_B,J_C$ represent the total spin and the total angular momentum of state A,B,C. $\Psi_{n_{A}L_{A}M_{L_{A}}}$ ,$\Psi_{n_A L_A M_{L_A}}$and $\Psi_{n_{C}L_{C}M_{L_{C}}}$ denotes the spatial wave functions of the baryon and meson in momentum space, respectively.
The decay amplitude of the $\Omega$ baryon in $^{3}P_{0}$ is written as
$$\begin{aligned}
\mathcal{M}^{M_{J_{A}}M_{J_{B}}M_{J_{C}}} & = & \langle B(n_{B}^{2S_{B}+1}L_{B(J_{B},M_{J_{B}})}),C(n_{C}^{2S_{C}+1}L_{C(J_{C},M_{J_{C}})})|T|A(n_{A}^{2S_{A}+1}L_{A(J_{A},M_{J_{A}})}\rangle\nonumber \\
& = & -3\gamma\sqrt{8E_{A}E_{B}E_{C}}\underset{M_{L_{A}},M_{S_{A}}}{\sum}\underset{M_{L_{B}},M_{S_{B}}}{\sum}\underset{M_{L_{C}},M_{S_{C}},m}{\sum}\langle L_{A}M_{L_{A}};S_{A}M_{S_{A}}|J_{A}M_{J_{A}}\rangle\langle1m;1-m|00\rangle\nonumber \\
& & \times\langle L_{B}M_{L_{B}};S_{B}M_{S_{B}}|J_{B}M_{J_{B}}\rangle\langle L_{C}M_{L_{C}};S_{C}M_{S_{C}}|J_{C}M_{J_{C}}\rangle\langle\chi_{S_{B}M_{S_{B}}}^{124}\chi_{S_{C}M_{S_{C}}}^{35}|\chi_{S_{A}M_{S_{A}}}^{123}\chi_{1-m}^{45}\rangle\nonumber \\
& & \times\langle\varphi_{B}^{124}\varphi_{C}^{35}|\varphi_{A}^{123}\varphi_{0}^{45}\rangle\times \sum_{\mbox{\tiny $\begin{array}{c}M_{L_\lambda^A},M_{L_\lambda^B}, M_{L_C} \\ M_{L_\rho^A},M_{L_\rho^B} \end{array}$ }} I_{n^{B}_\rho L^B_\rho M_{L_\rho^B}n^{B}_\lambda L^B_\lambda M_{L_\lambda^B}n_{C}L_{C}M_{L_{C}}}^{n^{A}_\rho L_{\rho}^{A},M_{L_{\rho}^{A}},n^A_\lambda L_{\lambda}^{A},M_{L_{\lambda}^{A}},1m}(\vec{P}_{B}),\label{eq:decay amplitudes}\end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}
\langle\chi_{S_{B}M_{S_{B}}}^{124}\chi_{S_{C}M_{S_{C}}}^{35}|\chi_{S_{A}M_{S_{A}}}^{123}\chi_{1-m}^{45}\rangle & = & \langle S_{1}M_{S_{1}};S_{2}M_{S_{2}}|S_{12}M_{S_{12}}\rangle\langle S_{12}M_{S_{12}};S_{3}M_{S_{3}}|S_{A}M_{S_{A}}\rangle\nonumber \\
& & \times\langle S_{1}M_{S_{1}};S_{2}M_{S_{2}}|S_{12}M_{S_{12}}\rangle\langle\ensuremath{S_{12}}\ensuremath{M_{S_{12}};}\ensuremath{\ensuremath{\ensuremath{\ensuremath{S_{4}M_{S_{4}}|}S_{B}M_{S_{B}}\rangle}}}\nonumber \\
& & \times\text{\text{\text{\ensuremath{\langle S_{3}M_{S_{3}};S_{5}M_{S_{5}}|S_{C}M_{S_{C}}\rangle\langle S_{4}M_{S_{4}};S_{5}M_{S_{5}}|10\rangle}}}}.\end{aligned}$$
In the equation Eq. (\[eq:decay amplitudes\]), $\langle\chi_{S_{B}M_{S_{B}}}^{124}\chi_{S_{C}M_{S_{C}}}^{35}|\chi_{S_{A}M_{S_{A}}}^{123}\chi_{1-m}^{45}\rangle$ and $\langle\varphi_{B}^{124}\varphi_{C}^{35}|\varphi_{A}^{123}\varphi_{0}^{45}\rangle$ stand for the spin matrix and the flavor matrix, respectively. $S_{i}$ stand for the spin of $i$th quark and $S_{12}$ stand for the total spin of 1 and 2 quarks. The pre-factor 3 in front of $\gamma$ arises from the fact that the three decay processes of the $\Omega$ baryon in $^{3}P_{0}$ model are equivalent.The summed magnetic quantum numbers are not completely independent of each other.
The overlap integral in the momentum space is written as
$$\begin{aligned}
I_{n^{B}_\rho L^B_\rho M_{L_\rho^B}n^{B}_\lambda L^B_\lambda M_{L_\lambda^B}n_{C}L_{C}M_{L_{C}}}^{n^{A}_\rho L_{\rho}^{A},M_{L_{\rho}^{A}},n^A_\lambda L_{\lambda}^{A},M_{L_{\lambda}^{A}},1m}(\vec{P}_{B}) & = & \int d^{3}\vec{p}_{1}d^{3}\vec{p}_{2}d^{3}\vec{p}_{3}d^{3}\vec{p}_{4}d^{3}\vec{p}_{5}\delta^{3}(\vec{p}_{1}+\vec{p}_{2}+\vec{p}_{3}-\vec{P}_{A})\delta^{3}(\vec{p}_{4}+\vec{p}_{5})\nonumber \\
& & \times\delta^{3}(\vec{p}_{1}+\vec{p}_{2}+\vec{p}_{4}-\vec{P}_{B})\delta^{3}(\vec{p}_{3}+\vec{p}_{5}-\vec{P}_{C})\Psi_{A}(\vec{p}_{1},\vec{p}_{2},\vec{p}_{3})\Psi_{B}^{*}(\vec{p}_{1},\vec{p}_{2},\vec{p}_{4})\Psi_{C}^{*}(\vec{p}_{3},\vec{p}_{5})\nonumber \\
& = & \int d\vec{p}_{\rho}d\vec{p}_{\lambda}|J|\Psi_{A}(\vec{p}_{\lambda}^{A},\vec{p}_{\rho}^{A})\Psi_{B}(\vec{P}_{B},\vec{p}_{\lambda}^{A},\vec{p}_{\rho}^{A})\Psi_{C}(-\vec{P}_{B},\vec{p}_{\lambda}^{A},\vec{p}_{\rho}^{A})\nonumber \\
& = & \int d\vec{p}_{\rho}^{A}d\vec{p}_{\lambda}^{A}d\Omega_{\rho}^{A}d\Omega_{\lambda}^{A}|J|\phi_{n_{\rho}^A L_{\rho}^{A}}(\vec{p}_{\rho}^{A})Y_{L_{\rho}^{A}M_{L_{\rho}^{A}}}(\Omega_{\rho}^{A})\phi_{n^{A}_\lambda L_{\lambda}^{A}}(\vec{p}_{\lambda}^{A})Y_{L_{\lambda}^{A}M_{L_{\lambda}^{A}}}(\Omega_{\lambda}^{A})\nonumber \\
& & \times\phi_{n^{B}_\rho L_{\rho}^{B}}(\vec{p}_{\rho}^{A})Y_{L_{\rho}^{B}M_{L_{\rho}^{B}}}(\Omega_{\rho}^{B})\phi_{n^{B}_\lambda L_{\lambda}^{B}}(\vec{p}_{\lambda}^{A}-\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}\frac{2m_{3}}{2m_{3}+m_{q}}\vec{P}_{B})Y_{L_{\lambda}^{B}M_{L_{\lambda}^{B}}}(\Omega_{\lambda}^{B})\nonumber \\
& & \times\phi_{n_{C}L_{C}}(\frac{m_{3}}{m_{3}+m_{q}}\vec{P}_{B}-\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\vec{p}_{\lambda}^{A})Y_{L_{C}M_{L_{C}}}(\Omega^{C})\nonumber \\
& & \times\mathcal{Y}_{1}^{m}(\vec{P}_{B}-\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\vec{p}_{\lambda}^{A}),\label{eq:momentum space integral}\end{aligned}$$
where $\vec{p}_{\rho}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\frac{m_{2}\vec{p}_{1}-m_{1}\vec{p}_{2}}{m_{1}+m_{2}})$ and $\vec{p}_{\lambda}=\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}(\frac{m_{3}(\vec{p}_{1}+\vec{p}_{2})-(m_{1}+m_{2})\vec{p}_{3}}{m_{1}+m_{2}+m_{3}})$ stand for the momentum corresponding to $\rho$ and $\lambda$ Jacobi coordinates in the center mass frame of baryon A, and $|J|$ stand for the Jacobi determinant which determined by the definition of $p_{\rho}$, $p_{\lambda}$. $m_{i}$ denote the mass of $i$th quark and $m_{q}$ denote the mass of the created quark pairs. the $n_{\rho}$ and $L_{\rho}$ denote the nodal and orbital angular momentum between the 1,2 quarks (see Fig. \[fig:decay figure\]), while the $n_{\lambda}$ and $L_{\lambda}$ stand for the nodal and orbital angular momentum between the 1,2 quarks system and the 3 quark (see Fig. \[fig:decay figure\]).
In the calculations, simple harmonic oscillator (SHO) wave functions is employed as the hadron wave function. The momentum space wave function of baryon is
$$\begin{aligned}
\Psi_{A}(\vec{P}_{A}) & = & N\psi_{n_{\rho_{A}}l_{\rho_{A}}M_{l_{\rho_{A}}}}(\vec{p}_{\rho_{A}})\psi_{n_{\lambda_{A}}l_{\lambda_{A}}M_{l_{\lambda_{A}}}}(\vec{p}_{\lambda_{A}})\nonumber \\
\psi_{nlM_{l}}(\vec{p}) & = & (-1)^{n}(-i)^{l}\left[\frac{2^{l+2}}{\sqrt{\pi}(2l+1)!!}\right]^{\frac{1}{2}}\nonumber \\
& & \times(\frac{1}{\beta})^{l+\frac{3}{2}}\textrm{exp}(-\frac{\vec{p}^{2}}{2\beta^{2}})L_{n}^{l+1/2}(\frac{\vec{p}^{2}}{\beta^{2}})\mathcal{Y}_{l}^{m}(\vec{p}),\end{aligned}$$
where $N$ stand for a normalization coefficient of the wave function and $L_{n}^{l+1/2}(\frac{\vec{p}^{2}}{\beta^{2}})$ is the Laguerre polynomial function. The Clebsch-Gorden coefficients of $l_\rho,l_\lambda$ coupling are equal to 1 in our case.
The ground state wave function of a meson in the momentum space is $$\Psi_{0,0}=\left[\frac{R^{2}}{\pi}\right]^{\frac{3}{4}}\textrm{exp}(-\frac{R^{2}\vec{p}_{ab}^{2}}{2}),$$ where the $\vec{p}_{ab}$ stands for the relative momentum between the quark and antiquark in the meson. As all hadrons in the final states are $S$-wave in this work, Eq. (\[eq:momentum space integral\]) can be further expressed as follows
$$\Pi(L_{\rho}^{A},M_{L_{\rho}^{A}},L_{\lambda}^{A},M_{L_{\lambda}^{A}},m)\equiv I_{n^{B}_\rho L^B_\rho M_{L_\rho^B}n^{B}_\lambda L^B_\lambda M_{L_\lambda^B}n_{C}L_{C}M_{L_{C}}}^{n^{A}_\rho L_{\rho}^{A},M_{L_{\rho}^{A}},n^A_\lambda L_{\lambda}^{A},M_{L_{\lambda}^{A}},1m}$$
the expressions of $\Pi(L_{\rho_{A},}M_{L_{\rho}^{A}},L_{\lambda_{A},}M_{L_{\lambda}^{A}},m)$ and harmonic oscillator wave function for the $S$-wave, $P$-wave, $D$-wave $\Omega$ baryons are collected in the appendix.
![The decay process of $A\rightarrow B+C$ in the $^{3}P_{0}$ model. \[fig:decay figure\]](Jaxo_tmp){width="6cm" height="8cm"}
The decay width $\Gamma$ of the process $A\to B+C$ is $$\begin{aligned}
\Gamma=\pi^{2}\frac{\left|\vec{p}\right|}{m_{A}^{2}}\frac{1}{2J_{A}+1}\underset{M_{J_{A}},M_{J_{B}},M_{J_{C}}}{\sum}\left|\mathcal{M}^{M_{J_{A}}M_{J_{B}}M_{J_{C}}}\right|^{2},\label{eq:decay width}\end{aligned}$$ where $J_{A}$ are the total angular momentum of the initial baryon $A$. $\vec{p}$ is the momentum of the final baryon in the center of mass frame of the initial baryon $A$ $$\left|\vec{p}\right|=\frac{\sqrt{\left[m_{A}^{2}-(m_{B}-m_{C})^{2}\right]\left[m_{A}^{2}-(m_{B}+m_{C})^{2}\right]}}{2m_{A}},$$ where $m_{A}$, $m_{B}$ and $m_{C}$ are the mass of the initial and final hadrons.
In order to partly remedy the inadequacy of the nonrelativistic wave function as the relative momentum $\vec{p}$ increases[@Li:1995si; @Zhao:1998fn; @Zhong:2007fx; @Zhong:2008kd; @Gui:2018rvv], the decay amplitude is written as $$\mathcal{M}(\vec{p})\rightarrow\gamma_{f}\mathcal{M}(\gamma_{f}\vec{p}),$$ where $\gamma_{f}$ denotes a commonly Lorentz boost factor, $\gamma_{f}=m_{B}/E_{B}$. In most decays, the three momenta carried by the final state baryons are relatively small, which means the nonrelativistic prescription is reasonable and the corrections from the Lorentz boost is not drastic.
numerical results and analysis
==============================
In our calculations, we adopt $m_{u}=m_{d}=350$ MeV, $m_{s}=450$ MeV for the constituent quark masses. The masses of the $\Omega$ baryons listed in Table \[tab:table-1\], the masses of $K$ mesons and $\Xi$ baryons are taken from the PDG [@Patrignani2016]. The quantum numbers involved in the calculations are listed in Tab \[tab:table-2\]. Due to the orthogonal relationship of the wave functions, only the $\lambda$ excited mode contributes. There are three harmonic oscillator parameters, the $\beta_{\rho}$ and $\beta_{\lambda}$ and $R$ in baryon and meson wave functions, respectively. We adopt $R=2.5$ GeV$^{-1}$ for $K$ mesons [@GodfreyStephenandMoats2016]. The parameter $\beta_{\rho}$ of the $\rho$-mode excitation between the 1,2 quarks (see Fig. \[fig:decay figure\]) is taken as $\beta_{\rho}=0.4$ GeV [@Xiao:2017udy]. The $\beta_{\lambda}$ is obtained with the relation [@Zhong:2007gp]: $$\beta_{\lambda}=\left(\frac{3m_{3}}{2m_{1}+m_{3}}\right)^{\frac{1}{4}}\beta_{\rho}.$$ For the quark pair creation strength from the vacuum, we take as those in Ref. [@GodfreyStephenandMoats2016], $\gamma=6.95$.
--------------------------------------------- --------------- ------------ ------------ --------------- --------------- ----- ------------ ---------------
States $J$ $n_{\rho}$ $l_{\rho}$ $n_{\lambda}$ $l_{\lambda}$ $L$ $S_{\rho}$ $S$
$\left|70,^{2}10,1,1,1/2^{-}\right\rangle $ $\frac{1}{2}$ $0$ $0$ $0$ $1$ $1$ $1$ $\frac{1}{2}$
$\left|70,^{2}10,1,1,3/2^{-}\right\rangle $ $\frac{3}{2}$ $0$ $0$ $0$ $1$ $1$ $1$ $\frac{1}{2}$
$\left|56,^{4}10,2,2,1/2^{+}\right\rangle $ $\frac{1}{2}$ $0$ $0$ $0$ $2$ $2$ $1$ $\frac{3}{2}$
$\left|56,^{4}10,2,2,3/2^{+}\right\rangle $ $\frac{3}{2}$ $0$ $0$ $0$ $2$ $2$ $1$ $\frac{3}{2}$
$\left|70,^{2}10,2,2,3/2^{+}\right\rangle $ $\frac{3}{2}$ $0$ $0$ $0$ $2$ $2$ $1$ $\frac{1}{2}$
$\left|56,^{4}10,2,2,5/2^{+}\right\rangle $ $\frac{5}{2}$ $0$ $0$ $0$ $2$ $2$ $1$ $\frac{3}{2}$
$\left|70,^{2}10,2,2,5/2^{+}\right\rangle $ $\frac{5}{2}$ $0$ $0$ $0$ $2$ $2$ $1$ $\frac{1}{2}$
$\left|56,^{4}10,2,2,7/2^{+}\right\rangle $ $\frac{7}{2}$ $0$ $0$ $0$ $2$ $2$ $1$ $\frac{3}{2}$
--------------------------------------------- --------------- ------------ ------------ --------------- --------------- ----- ------------ ---------------
: \[tab:table-2\]The Quantum numbers of 1$P$-wave and 1$D$-wave $\Omega$ baryons. Due to the orthogonal relationship of the wave functions, only the $\lambda$ excited mode contributes.
The $1 P$-wave states
----------------------
According to the $SU(6)$ supermultiplet classification (see table \[tab:table-1\]), there are two 1$P$-wave states with $J^{P}=\frac{1}{2}^{-}$ and $J^{P}=\frac{3}{2}^{-}$, i.e. $\left|70,^{2}10,1,1,1/2^{-}\right\rangle $ and $\left|70,^{2}10,1,1,3/2^{-}\right\rangle $. The mass of the newly observed $\Omega(2012)$ state is close to the $1P$-wave $\Omega$ baryon predicted in various quark models (see table \[tab:table-1\]). Assuming $\Omega(2012)$ as a candidate of the $1P$-wave $\Omega$ baryons, we calculate the OZI-allowed two body strong decays in the $^{3}P_{0}$ model, and list our results in table \[tab:table-3\].
It is found that if one assigns $\Omega(2012)$ as the $J^{P}=\frac{1}{2}^{-}$ state $\left|70,^{2}10,1,1,1/2^{-}\right\rangle $, the width is predicted to be $$\Gamma_{\textrm{total}}^{\textrm{th}}\simeq 43 \textrm{ MeV},$$ which is too large to be comparable with the width of $\Omega(2012)$. This width predicted in the $^{3}P_{0}$ model is about a factor 3 larger than that predicted within the chiral quark model [@Xiao2018a].
On the other hand, assigning $\Omega(2012)$ as the $J^{P}=\frac{3}{2}^{-}$ state $\left|70,^{2}10,1,1,3/2^{-}\right\rangle $, we find that the width $$\Gamma_{\textrm{total}}^{\textrm{th}}\simeq 8\textrm{ MeV},$$ and the branching fraction ratio $$R^{\mathrm{th}}=\frac{\Gamma\left[\left|70,^{2}10,1,1,3/2^{-}\right\rangle \rightarrow\Xi^{0}K^{-}\right]}{\Gamma\left[\left|70,^{2}10,1,1,3/2^{-}\right\rangle \rightarrow\Xi^{-}\bar{K}{}^{0}\right]}\simeq1.1,$$ are consistent with the measured width $\Gamma^{\mathrm{exp}} = 6.4_{-2.0}^{+2.5}(\textrm{stat})\pm 1.6(\textrm{syst})$ and ratio $R^{\mathrm{exp}}=1.2\pm 0.3$ for $\Omega(2012)$. These $^{3}P_{0}$ model predictions are compatible with those predicted within the chiral quark model [@Xiao2018a].
--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------ ---------------- ----------------------------
States $\Gamma_{\textrm{total}}^{\textrm{th}}$ $\Gamma_{\textrm{total}}^{\textrm{th}}$ [@Xiao2018a] $\mathfrak{B}$ $\mathfrak{B}$[@Xiao2018a]
$\left|70,^{2}10,1,1,1/2^{-}\right\rangle $ $43.0$ $15.2$ $0.96$ $0.95$
$\left|70,^{2}10,1,1,3/2^{-}\right\rangle $ $8.19$ $6.64$ $1.11$ $1.12$
--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------ ---------------- ----------------------------
: \[tab:table-3\]The total decay widths (MeV) of the $\left|70,^{2}10,1,1,1/2^{-}\right\rangle $ and $\left|70,^{2}10,1,1,3/2^{-}\right\rangle $ states with mass $M=2012\textrm{ MeV}$. $\Gamma_{\textrm{total}}^{\textrm{th}}$ denotes the total decay width and $\mathfrak{B}$ stands for the radio of the branching fraction $\Gamma[\Xi^{0}K^{-}]/\Gamma[\Xi^{-}\bar{K}^{0}]$. The results of Ref. [@Xiao2018a] are also listed for a comparison. The units of widths is MeV.
The 1 $D$-wave states
----------------------
According to the quark model classification, there are six 1$D$-wave states. Their masses are predicted to be in the range of 2.2-2.3 GeV in various models (see [tab:table-1]{}). Their OZI allowed two-body strong decay channels are $\Xi K$ and $\Xi(1530)K$. With the masses predicted in Ref. [@ChaoKuang-TaandIsgurNathanandKarl1981a], we study the strong decay processes of 1$D$-wave states into both $\Xi K$ and $\Xi(1530)K$ channels, and collect their partial decay widths in Table \[tab:table-4\].
It is interesting to find that the two $J^{P}=5/2^{+}$ states $ |56,^{4}10,2,2,5/2^{+} \rangle $ and $ |70,^{2}10,2,2,5/2^{+} \rangle $ may be good candidates of $\Omega(2250)$ listed in the review book of PDG [@Patrignani2016]. (i) The mass of $\Omega(2250)$ is close the predictions of $\left|56,^{4}10,2,2,5/2^{+}\right\rangle $ and $ |70,^{2}10,2,2,5/2^{+} \rangle $ in the quark model [@ChaoKuang-TaandIsgurNathanandKarl1981a]. (ii) The measured width of $\Omega(2250)$, $\Gamma=55\pm18$ MeV, is close to the theoretical predictions, $\Gamma\sim 80/50$ MeV for $ |56,^{4}10,2,2,5/2^{+} \rangle $ and $ |70,^{2}10,2,2,5/2^{+} \rangle $, respectively. (iii) The decays modes of $ |56,^{4}10,2,2,5/2^{+} \rangle $ and $ |70,^{2}10,2,2,5/2^{+} \rangle $ are dominated by $\Xi(1530)K$, which is also consistent with the fact that the $\Omega(2250)$ was seen in the $\Xi(1530)K$ and $\Xi^{-}\pi^{+}K^{-}$ channels. In [@Xiao2018a], we predicted that $\Omega(2250)$ is more likely to be the $J^{P}=5/2^+$ $ |56,^{4}10,2,2,5/2^{+} \rangle $ with the chiral quark model, and the width of $ |70,^{2}10,2,2,5/2^{+} \rangle $ is predicted to be $\sim 12$ MeV, which is about a factor 4 smaller than the width of $\Omega(2250)$.
The $J^P=3/2^+$ state $|70,^{2}10,2,2,3/2^{+}\rangle $ is a narrow state with a width of $\Gamma\simeq 23$ MeV, and has comparable decay rates into $\Xi K$ and $\Xi(1530)K$ channels. These predictions of the $^3P_0$ model are consistent with those in the chiral quark model [@Xiao2018a]. While the other $J^P=3/2^+$ state $|56,^{4}10,2,2,3/2^{+}\rangle $ is found to be a broad state with a width of $\Gamma\simeq 130$ MeV, the partial width ratio between $\Xi K$ and $\Xi(1530)K$ is predicted to be $$\frac{\Gamma [\Xi K]}{\Gamma [\Xi(1530)K]}\simeq1.4.$$ The predicted width for $|56,^{4}10,2,2,3/2^{+}\rangle $ in this work is about a factor 3 larger than that predicted with the chiral quark model [@Xiao2018a].
The $J^P=1/2^+$ state $|56,^{4}10,2,2,1/2^{+}\rangle $ is the broadest state in the 1$D$-wave states. It has a width of $\Gamma\sim170$ MeV, and mainly decays into the $\Xi K$ channel. However, in the chiral quark model a relatively narrower width $\Gamma\sim 56$ MeV is given for $|56,^{4}10,2,2,1/2^{+}\rangle $ [@Xiao2018a].
The $J^P=7/2^+$ state $|56,^{4}10,2,2,7/2^{+}\rangle $ may be a narrow state with a width of $\Gamma\sim 30$ MeV. This state mainly decays into the $\Xi K$ channel. The decay properties of $|56,^{4}10,2,2,7/2^{+}\rangle $ predicted in this work are consistent with those of chiral quark model in Ref. [@Xiao2018a].
As a whole most of the 1$D$-wave states has a relatively narrow width, they has potentials to be observed in their dominant decay modes. The $\Omega(2250)$ resonance may be assigned to the $J^{P}=5/2^{+}$ state $ |56,^{4}10,2,2,5/2^{+} \rangle $ or $ |70,^{2}10,2,2,5/2^{+} \rangle $. Although the decay widths predicted for the $D$-wave states within the chiral quark model and $^3P_0$ model show some differences, the partial width ratios of $\Gamma[\Xi K]/\Gamma[\Xi(1530)K]$ predicted within these two models are in a reasonable agreement with each other.
--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- ----------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------------------ ----------------------- ----------------------------------- --------------- ---------------------------
States Mass[@ChaoKuang-TaandIsgurNathanandKarl1981a] $\Gamma[\Xi K]$ $\Gamma[\Xi K]$[@Xiao2018a] $\Gamma[\Xi(1530) K]$ $\Gamma[\Xi(1530) K]$ [@Xiao2018a] $\Gamma_{total}^{th}$ $\Gamma_{total}^{th}$[@Xiao2018a] $\mathcal{B}$ $\mathcal{B}$[@Xiao2018a]
$\left|56,^{4}10,2,2,1/2^{+}\right\rangle $ $2210$ $154 $ $51.8$ $16.5$ $4.53$ $171 $ $56.3$ $9.36$ $11.4$
$\left|56,^{4}10,2,2,3/2^{+}\right\rangle $ $2215$ $76.8$ $25.8$ $55.4$ $15.7$ $132 $ $41.5$ $1.39$ $1.64$
$\left|56,^{4}10,2,2,5/2^{+}\right\rangle $ $2225$ $7.78$ $6.58$ $77.2$ $22.6$ $84.9$ $29.2$ $0.10$ $0.29$
$\left|56,^{4}10,2,2,7/2^{+}\right\rangle $ $2210$ $31.7$ $26.2$ $2.94$ $1.51$ $34.7$ $27.7$ $10.8$ $17.4$
$\left|70,^{2}10,2,2,3/2^{+}\right\rangle $ $2265$ $9.04$ $7.40$ $14.3$ $11.9$ $23.4$ $20.9$ $0.63$ $0.62$
$\left|70,^{2}10,2,2,5/2^{+}\right\rangle $ $2265$ $4.34$ $0.99$ $50.0$ $11.6$ $54.4$ $13.4$ $0.09$ $0.08$
--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- ----------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------------------ ----------------------- ----------------------------------- --------------- ---------------------------
SUMMARY
=======
Stimulated by the newly discovered $\Omega(2012)$ resonance at Belle II, in this work we have studied the OZI allowed strong decays of $1P$- and $1D$-wave $\Omega$ baryons within the $^{3}P_{0}$ model.
It is found that the newly observed state $\Omega(2012)$ favors the $1P$-wave $\Omega$ state with $J^P=3/2^-$, $|70,^{2}10,1,1,3/2^{-}\rangle $. Both the decay mode and decay width are consistent with the observations. The other $1P$-wave $\Omega$ state with $J^P=1/2^-$, $|70,^{2}10,1,1,1/2^{-}\rangle $, might have a relatively broad width of $\mathcal{O}(10)$ MeV. This $J^P=1/2^-$ state should be observed in the $\Xi^0K^-$ and $\Xi^-\bar{K}^0$ channels as well.
In the $1D$-wave $\Omega$ states, it is found that the $\Omega(2250)$ state may favor the $J^{P}=5/2^{+}$ state $ |56,^{4}10,2,2,5/2^{+} \rangle $ or $ |70,^{2}10,2,2,5/2^{+} \rangle $. These two $J^{P}=5/2^{+}$ states dominantly decay into the $\Xi(1530)K$ channel, and have a similar decay width to that of $\Omega(2250)$. Due to a large uncertainty of the width of $\Omega(2250)$, we can’t distinguish it belongs to the 70 multiplet or 56 multiplet. Future experiment information will help to clarify this issue. For the other $1D$-wave $\Omega$ baryons, we recommend looking for the $J^{P}=1/2^{+}$ and $J^{P}=7/2^{+}$ states in the $\Xi K$ decay channel and looking for the $J^{P}=3/2^{+}$ states in both $\Xi K$ and $\Xi(1530)K$ decay channels in future experiments.
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants No. 11405053, No.11775078, No.U1832173, No.11705056. This work is also in part supported by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under Grant No. 2017M620492.
THE HARMONIC OSCILLATOR WAVE FUNCTIONS
=======================================
For the $S$-wave omega baryon, the harmonic oscillator wave function is
$$\begin{aligned}
\Psi(0,0,0,0) & = & \left(\frac{4}{\sqrt{\pi}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\left(\frac{1}{\beta_{\rho}}\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}y_{0,0}(\vec{p}_{\rho})e^{-\frac{\vec{p}_{\rho}^{2}}{2\beta_{\rho}^{2}}-\frac{\vec{p}_{\lambda}^{2}}{2\beta_{\lambda}^{2}}}\nonumber \\
& & \times\left(\frac{4}{\sqrt{\pi}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\left(\frac{1}{\beta_{\lambda}}\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}y_{0,0}(\vec{p}_{\lambda})\end{aligned}$$
For the $P$-wave omega baryon, the harmonic oscillator wave function is
$$\begin{aligned}
\Psi(0,0,1,m_{l\lambda}) & = & -i\left(\frac{4}{\sqrt{\pi}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\left(\frac{1}{\beta_{\rho}}\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}y_{0,0}(\vec{p}_{\rho})e^{-\frac{\vec{p}_{\rho}^{2}}{2\beta_{\rho}^{2}}-\frac{\vec{p}_{\lambda}^{2}}{2\beta_{\lambda}^{2}}}\nonumber \\
& & \times\left(\frac{8}{3\sqrt{\pi}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\left(\frac{1}{\beta_{\lambda}}\right)^{\frac{5}{2}}y_{1,m_{l\lambda}}(\vec{p}_{\lambda}),\end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}
\Psi(1,m_{l\rho},0,0) & = & -i\left(\frac{8}{3\sqrt{\pi}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\left(\frac{1}{\beta_{\rho}}\right)^{\frac{5}{2}}y_{1,m_{l\rho}}(\vec{p}_{\rho})e^{-\frac{\vec{p}_{\rho}^{2}}{2\beta_{\rho}^{2}}-\frac{\vec{p}_{\lambda}^{2}}{2\beta_{\lambda}^{2}}}\nonumber \\
& & \times\left(\frac{4}{\sqrt{\pi}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\left(\frac{1}{\beta_{\lambda}}\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}y_{0,0}(\vec{p}_{\lambda}),\end{aligned}$$
For the $D$-wave omega baryon, the harmonic oscillator wave function is
$$\begin{aligned}
\Psi(0,0,2,m_{l\lambda}) & = & -\left(\frac{4}{\sqrt{\pi}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\left(\frac{1}{\beta_{\rho}}\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}y_{0,0}(\vec{p}_{\rho})e^{-\frac{\vec{p}_{\rho}^{2}}{2\beta_{\rho}^{2}}-\frac{\vec{p}_{\lambda}^{2}}{2\beta_{\lambda}^{2}}}\nonumber \\
& & \times\left(\frac{16}{15\sqrt{\pi}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\left(\frac{1}{\beta_{\lambda}}\right)^{\frac{7}{2}}y_{2,m_{l\lambda}}(\vec{p}_{\lambda}),\end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}
\Psi(2,m_{l\rho},0,0) & = & -\left(\frac{16}{15\sqrt{\pi}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\left(\frac{1}{\beta_{\rho}}\right)^{\frac{7}{2}}y_{2,m_{l\rho}}(\vec{p}_{\rho})e^{-\frac{\vec{p}_{\rho}^{2}}{2\beta_{\rho}^{2}}-\frac{\vec{p}_{\lambda}^{2}}{2\beta_{\lambda}^{2}}}\nonumber \\
& & \times(\frac{4}{\sqrt{\pi}})^{\frac{1}{2}}(\frac{1}{\beta_{\lambda}})^{\frac{3}{2}}y_{0,0}(\vec{p}_{\lambda}),\end{aligned}$$
Where $\vec{p}_{\rho}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\vec{p}_{1}-\vec{p}_{2})$ and $\vec{p}_{\lambda}=\sqrt{\frac{1}{6}}(\vec{p}_{1}+\vec{p}_{2}-2\vec{p}_{3})$ are obtained in the relative Jacobi coordinates. The $y_{l,m_{l}}(\vec{p})$ is the solid harmonic polynomial.
The wave function of the meson in our calculation is
$$\Psi(0,0)=\left(\frac{R^{2}}{\pi}\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}e^{-\frac{(\vec{p}_{3}-\vec{p}_{5})^{2}R^{2}}{8}}$$
Here $\vec{p}_{C}=\frac{\vec{p}_{3}-\vec{p}_{5}}{2}$, $R=\frac{1}{\beta_{C}}$.
THE MOMENTUM SPACE INTEGRATION
==============================
The momentum space integration $\Pi(L^A_{\rho },M^A_{\rho},L^A_{\lambda},M^A_{\lambda },m)$ are presented in the following $$\Pi(0,0,0,0,0)=\beta\left|\vec{p}\right|\Delta_{0,0}.$$
For the $P$-wave omega baryon decay,
$$\Pi(0,0,1,0,0)=\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}\lambda_{2}}-\frac{\lambda_{3}}{2\lambda_{2}}\beta\left|\vec{p}\right|^{2}\right)\Delta_{0,1},$$
$$\begin{aligned}
\Pi(0,0,1,1,-1) & =-\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}\lambda_{2}}\Delta_{0,1}\nonumber \\
& =\Pi(0,0,1,-1,1).\end{aligned}$$
For the $D$-wave omega baryon decay,
$$\Pi(0,0,2,0,0)=\left(\frac{\lambda_{3}^{2}}{2\lambda_{2}^{2}}\beta\left|\vec{p}\right|^{3}-\frac{\sqrt{6}\lambda_{3}}{3\lambda_{2}^{2}}\left|\vec{p}\right|\right)\Delta_{0,2},$$
$$\begin{aligned}
\Pi(0,0,2,1,-1) & =\frac{\lambda_{3}}{\sqrt{2}\lambda_{2}^{2}}\left|\vec{p}\right|\Delta_{0,2}\nonumber \\
& =\Pi(0,0,2,-1,1).\end{aligned}$$
Here,
$$\lambda_{1}=\frac{1}{2\beta_{\rho}^{2}}+\frac{1}{2\beta_{\rho}^{'2}},\text{\quad}\lambda_{2}=\frac{1}{2\beta_{\lambda}^{2}}+\frac{1}{2\beta_{\lambda}^{'2}}+\frac{R^{2}}{3},$$
$$\lambda_{3}=\frac{\sqrt{6}m_{3}}{(2m_{3}+m_{5})\beta_{\lambda}^{'2}}+\frac{m_{3}}{m_{3}+m_{5}}\frac{\sqrt{6}R^{2}}{3},$$
$$\lambda_{4}=\frac{3m_{3}^{2}}{(2m_{3}+m_{5})^{2}\beta_{\lambda}^{'2}}+\frac{m_{3}^{2}}{(m_{3}+m_{5})^{2}}\frac{R^{2}}{2},$$
$$\beta=1-\frac{\lambda_{3}}{\sqrt{6}\lambda_{2}},$$
and
$$\begin{aligned}
\Delta_{0,0} & = & \left(\frac{1}{\pi\beta_{\rho}^{'2}}\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}\left(\frac{1}{\pi\beta_{\lambda}^{'2}}\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}\left(\frac{R^{2}}{\pi}\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}\left(\frac{\pi^{2}}{\lambda_{1}\lambda_{2}}\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}e^{-\left(\lambda_{4}-\frac{\lambda_{3}^{2}}{4\lambda_{2}}\right)\left|\vec{p}\right|^{2}}\nonumber \\
& & \times\left(-\sqrt{\frac{3}{4\pi}}\right)\left(\frac{1}{\pi\beta_{\rho}^{2}}\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}\left(\frac{1}{\pi\beta_{\lambda}^{2}}\right)^{\frac{3}{4}},\end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}
\Delta_{0,1} & = & \left(\frac{1}{\pi\beta_{\rho}^{'2}}\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}\left(\frac{1}{\pi\beta_{\lambda}^{'2}}\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}\left(\frac{R^{2}}{\pi}\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}\left(\frac{\pi^{2}}{\lambda_{1}\lambda_{2}}\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}e^{-\left(\lambda_{4}-\frac{\lambda_{3}^{2}}{4\lambda_{2}}\right)\left|\vec{p}\right|^{2}}\nonumber \\
& & \times\frac{3i}{4\pi}\left(\frac{1}{\pi\beta_{\rho}^{2}}\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}\left(\frac{8}{3\sqrt{\pi}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\left(\frac{1}{\beta_{\lambda}^{2}}\right)^{\frac{5}{4}},\end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}
\Delta_{0,2} & = & \left(\frac{1}{\pi\beta_{\rho}^{'2}}\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}\left(\frac{1}{\pi\beta_{\lambda}^{'2}}\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}\left(\frac{R^{2}}{\pi}\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}\left(\frac{\pi^{2}}{\lambda_{1}\lambda_{2}}\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}e^{-\left(\lambda_{4}-\frac{\lambda_{3}^{2}}{4\lambda_{2}}\right)|\vec{p}|^2}\nonumber \\
& & \times \frac{\sqrt{15}}{8\pi}\left(\frac{1}{\pi\beta_{\rho}^{2}}\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}\left(\frac{16}{15\sqrt{\pi}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\left(\frac{1}{\beta_{\lambda}^{2}}\right)^{\frac{7}{4}},\end{aligned}$$
where the momentum space integration $\Pi(L^A_{\rho },M^A_{\rho},L^A_{\lambda},M^A_{\lambda },m)$ is introduced in Ref. [@Xiao2017], what makes our differences from Ref. [@Xiao2017] is that we take into account difference of the masses of the quarks in baryons.
[10]{}
V. E. Barnes [*et al.*]{}, Observation of a Hyperon with Strangeness -3, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**12**]{}, 204 (1964). Y. Oh, Xi and Omega baryons in the Skyrme model, Phys. Rev. D [**75**]{}, 074002 (2007).
S. Capstick and N. Isgur, Baryons in a Relativized Quark Model with Chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D [**34**]{}, 2809 (1986)\[AIP Conf. Proc. [**132**]{}, 267 (1985)\].
R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, Strange baryon spectroscopy in the relativistic quark model, Phys. Rev. D [**92**]{}, no. 5, 054005 (2015).
U. L[ö]{}ring, B. C. Metsch and H. R. Petry, The Light baryon spectrum in a relativistic quark model with instanton induced quark forces: The Nonstrange baryon spectrum and ground states, Eur. Phys. J. A [**10**]{}, 395 (2001). U. L[ö]{}ring, B. Ch Metsch, and H. R. Petry.
J. Liu, R. D. McKeown and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Global Analysis of Nucleon Strange Form Factors at Low Q\*\*2, Phys. Rev. C [**76**]{}, 025202 (2007).
K. T. Chao, N. Isgur and G. Karl, Strangeness -2 and -3 Baryons in a Quark Model With Chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D [**23**]{}, 155 (1981).
Y. Chen and B. Q. Ma, Light flavor baryon spectrum with higher order hyperfine interactions, Nucl. Phys. A [**831**]{}, 1 (2009).
C. S. An, B. C. Metsch and B. S. Zou, Mixing of the low-lying three- and five-quark $\Omega$ states with negative parity, Phys. Rev. C [**87**]{}, no. 6, 065207 (2013).
C. S. An and B. S. Zou, Low-lying $\Omega$ states with negative parity in an extended quark model with Nambu-Jona-Lasinio interaction, Phys. Rev. C [**89**]{}, no. 5, 055209 (2014).
C. Hayne and N. Isgur, Beyond the Wave Function at the Origin: Some Momentum Dependent Effects in the Nonrelativistic Quark Model, Phys. Rev. D [**25**]{}, 1944 (1982).
M. Pervin and W. Roberts, Strangeness -2 and -3 baryons in a constituent quark model, Phys. Rev. C [**77**]{}, 025202 (2008).
G. P. Engel, C. B. Lang, D. Mohler and A. Schafer, QCD with Two Light Dynamical Chirally Improved Quarks, Acta Phys. Polon. Supp. [**6**]{}, no. 3, 873 (2013).
J. Liang [*et al.*]{} \[CLQCD Collaboration\], Spectrum and Bethe-Salpeter amplitudes of $\Omega$ baryons from lattice QCD, Chin. Phys. C [**40**]{}, no. 4, 041001 (2016).
C. Patrignani [*et al.*]{} \[Particle Data Group\], Review of Particle Physics, Chin. Phys. C [**40**]{}, no. 10, 100001 (2016).
J. Yelton [*et al.*]{} \[Belle Collaboration\], Observation of an Excited $\Omega^-$ Baryon, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**121**]{}, no. 5, 052003 (2018).
L. Y. Xiao and X. H. Zhong, Possible interpretation of the newly observed $\Omega$(2012) state, Phys. Rev. D [**98**]{}, no. 3, 034004 (2018).
T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi, Y. Sarac and H. Sundu, Interpretation of the newly discovered $\Omega$(2012), Phys. Rev. D [**98**]{}, no. 1, 014031 (2018).
T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi, Y. Sarac and H. Sundu, Nature of the $\Omega$(2012) through its strong decays, arXiv:1807.02145 \[hep-ph\].
M. P. Valderrama, $\Omega(2012)$ as a hadronic molecule, Phys. Rev. D [**98**]{}, no. 5, 054009 (2018).
R. Pavao and E. Oset, Coupled channels dynamics in the generation of the $\Omega (2012)$ resonance, arXiv:1808.01950 \[hep-ph\].
Y. H. Lin and B. S. Zou, Hadronic molecular assignment for the newly observed $\Omega^*$ state, Phys. Rev. D [**98**]{}, no. 5, 056013 (2018).
Y. Huang, M. Z. Liu, J. X. Lu, J. J. Xie and L. S. Geng, Strong decay modes $\bar{K}\Xi$ and $\bar{K}\Xi\pi$ of the $\Omega(2012)$ in the $\bar{K}\Xi(1530)$ and $\eta\Omega$ molecular scenario, arXiv:1807.06485 \[hep-ph\].
M. V. Polyakov, H. D. Son, B. D. Sun and A. Tandogan, $\Omega(2012)$ through the looking glass of flavour SU(3), arXiv:1806.04427 \[hep-ph\].
L. Micu, Decay rates of meson resonances in a quark model, Nucl. Phys. B [**10**]{}, 521 (1969).
R. D. Carlitz and M. Kislinger, Regge amplitude arising from su(6)w vertices, Phys. Rev. D [**2**]{}, 336 (1970).
A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene and J.-C. Raynal, Naive quark pair creation model and baryon decays, Phys. Rev. D [**9**]{}, 1415 (1974).
A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene and J. C. Raynal, Resonant Partial Wave Amplitudes in $\pi + n \to \pi + \pi + n$ According to the Naive Quark Pair Creation Model, Phys. Rev. D [**11**]{}, 1272 (1975).
A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene and J. C. Raynal, Why Is $\psi^{\prime\prime\prime}$ (4.414) SO Narrow?, Phys. Lett. [**72B**]{}, 57 (1977).
A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene and J.-C. Raynal, Strong Decays of $\psi^{\prime\prime}$ (4.028) as a Radial Excitation of Charmonium, Phys. Lett. [**71B**]{}, 397 (1977).
A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene and J. C. Raynal, Hadron Transitions In The Quark Model, NEW YORK, USA: GORDON AND BREACH (1988) 311p.
A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene and J. C. Raynal, Naive quark pair creation model of strong interaction vertices, Phys. Rev. D [**8**]{}, 2223 (1973).
Z. P. Li, The Threshold pion photoproduction of nucleons in the chiral quark model, Phys. Rev. D [**50**]{}, 5639 (1994).
Q. Zhao, Z. p. Li and C. Bennhold, Vector meson photoproduction with an effective Lagrangian in the quark model, Phys. Rev. C [**58**]{}, 2393 (1998).
X. H. Zhong, Q. Zhao, J. He and B. Saghai, Study of $\pi^- p \to \eta n$ at low energies in a chiral constituent quark model, Phys. Rev. C [**76**]{}, 065205 (2007).
L. Y. Xiao and X. H. Zhong, Strong decays of higher excited heavy-light mesons in a chiral quark model, Phys. Rev. D [**90**]{}, no. 7, 074029 (2014).
L. C. Gui, L. S. Lu, Q. F. Lü, X. H. Zhong and Q. Zhao, Strong decays of higher charmonium states into open-charm meson pairs, Phys. Rev. D [**98**]{}, 016010 (2018). S. Godfrey and K. Moats, Properties of Excited Charm and Charm-Strange Mesons, Phys. Rev. D [**93**]{}, no. 3, 034035 (2016).
L. Y. Xiao, K. L. Wang, Q. f. L[ü]{}, X. H. Zhong and S. L. Zhu, Strong and radiative decays of the doubly charmed baryons, Phys. Rev. D [**96**]{}, no. 9, 094005 (2017)
X. H. Zhong and Q. Zhao, Charmed baryon strong decays in a chiral quark model, Phys. Rev. D [**77**]{}, 074008 (2008).
L. Y. Xiao, Q. F. L[ü]{} and S. L. Zhu, Strong decays of the $1P$ and $2D$ doubly charmed states, Phys. Rev. D [**97**]{}, 074005 (2018).
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'The self-similar decay of energy in a turbulent flow is studied in direct numerical simulations with and without rotation. Two initial conditions are considered: one non-helical (mirror-symmetric), and one with maximal helicity. The results show that, while in the absence of rotation the energy in the helical and non-helical cases decays with the same rate, in rotating flows the helicity content has a major impact on the decay rate. These differences are associated with differences in the energy and helicity cascades when rotation is present. Properties of the structures that arise in the flow at late times in each time are also discussed.'
author:
- 'T. Teitelbaum$^{1}$ and P.D. Mininni $^{1,2}$'
title: Effect of helicity and rotation on the free decay of turbulent flows
---
Turbulence is ubiquitous in nature, and many turbulent flows are also rotating. The effect of rotation becomes important when the Rossby number (the ratio of the convective to the Coriolis acceleration) is sufficiently small. Mid-latitude synoptic scales in the atmosphere, stellar convective regions, and turbomachinery are examples of such flows. Helicity (alignment of the velocity and the vorticity) is also important for many processes in astrophysical, geophysical and engineering flows. As an example, helical flows were proposed as the reason for the stability of rotating convective thunderstorms [@Lilly86].
Studies of isotropic and homogeneous helical turbulence [@group1; @Kraichnan73] showed that both the helicity and the energy are transferred toward smaller scales with constant fluxes. Moreover, it was observed that the scaling of the energy (Kolmogorov’s law) was unchanged by the presence of helicity. As a result, helicity is expected to globally arrest the energy decay, but not to change its self-similar decay rate. Non-helical rotating turbulence has been studied in detail (see e.g., [@group2] and references therein), but perhaps because of the similarities between the helical and non-helical cases in non-rotating flows, not much attention has been paid to helical rotating turbulence.
The lack of detailed studies of rotating helical flows is remarkable considering the relevance of both helicity and rotation in many astrophysical and geophysical processes. In this work, we study the effect of rotation and of helicity in the self-similar decay of energy in turbulent flows. Even in isotropic and homogeneous turbulence, the law for the decay rate of energy is a matter of debate [@group5]. It is known that it depends on properties of the infrared energy spectrum (i.e., the spectrum at scales larger than the energy containing scale), and may depend on other statistical properties of the initial conditions. As a result, in this letter we will consider only two flows with the same infrarred spectrum and the same energy decay rate in the absence of rotation, and study how the presence of helicity and rotation changes their decay. New decay laws are found for helical rotating flows in numerical simulations. The results are then interpreted in terms of how the energy and helicity cascades are modified when rotation is present, and a phenomenological theory that is in agreement with the simulations is finally discussed.
The numerical simulations solve the Navier-Stokes equations for an incompressible fluid in a rotating frame, $$\partial_t {\bf u} + \mbox{\boldmath $\omega$} \times
{\bf u} + 2 \mbox{\boldmath $\Omega$} \times {\bf u} =
- \nabla {\cal P} + \nu \nabla^2 {\bf u} ,
\label{eq:momentum}$$ where ${\bf u}$ is the velocity field ($\nabla \cdot {\bf u} =0$), $\mbox{\boldmath $\omega$} = \nabla \times {\bf u}$ is the vorticity, ${\cal P}$ is the total pressure (modified by the centrifugal term), and $\nu$ is the kinematic viscosity. We chose the rotation axis to be in the $z$ direction, $\mbox{\boldmath $\Omega$} = \Omega \hat{z}$, with $\Omega$ the rotation frequency. Our integration domain is a periodic box of length $2\pi$. Two sets of runs were done at resolutions of $256^3$ (set A) and $512^3$ grid points (set B) using a pseudo spectral code. The parameters for all the runs are listed in Table \[table:runs\].
Run $\nu$ $\Omega$ $Re$ $Ro$ $Ro^\omega$ $E_k$ $h$
----- --------------------- ---------- -------- --------- ------------- --------------------- -------- --
A1 $1.5\times 10^{-3}$ $0$ $450$ $-$ $-$ $-$ $0$
A2 $1.5\times 10^{-3}$ $0$ $600$ $-$ $-$ $-$ $0.95$
A3 $1.5\times 10^{-3}$ $4$ $550$ $0.12$ $1.28$ $2.2\times 10^{-4}$ $0$
A4 $1.5\times 10^{-3}$ $4$ $830$ $0.083$ $0.8$ $1.0\times 10^{-4}$ $0.95$
B1 $7\times 10^{-4}$ $4$ $1100$ $0.12$ $1.82$ $1.1\times 10^{-4}$ $0$
B2 $7\times 10^{-4}$ $4$ $1750$ $0.083$ $1.15$ $4.7\times 10^{-5}$ $0.95$
: \[table:runs\]Parameters used in the simulations: $\nu$ is the kinematic viscosity, $\Omega$ is the rotation rate, $Re$ is the Reynolds number, $Ro$ is the Rossby number, $Ro^{\omega}$ is the micro-Rossby number, $E_k$ is the Ekman number, and $h$ is the relative helicity of the initial conditions. The values of $Re$, $Ro$, $Ro^{\omega}$, and $E_k$ are given at the time of the peak of dissipation $t^*$.
To simulate systems with different amount of relative initial helicity ($h = H/\left<|{\bf u}||\mbox{\boldmath $\omega$}|\right>$ where $H=\left<{\bf u}\cdot\mbox{\boldmath $\omega$}\right>$ is the flow net helicity), two flows were considered as initial conditions: the Taylor-Green (TG) flow [@Taylor37], and the Arn’old-Beltrami-Childress (ABC) flow [@Childress]. The TG flow is non-helical, and has zero energy in the $k_z=0$ mode, whose amplification observed in the rotating cases (see below) is thus only due to a cascade process. The TG flow was chosen for its importance in hydrodynamics; it was originally motivated as an initial condition which leads to rapid development of small spatial scales. It also mimics the von Kármán flows between two counter-rotating disks used in several experiments. The ABC flow is an eigenfunction of the curl operator and as a result has maximum helicity. It was used as a paradigmatic example to study helical flows in the atmosphere [@Lilly86]. Both flows develop, after a short time, an infrared energy spectrum proportional to $k^2$; this is important to ensure we can compare the decay rates of both flows. The simulations were started using a superposition of these flows from wavenumbers $k=4$ to $14$. Runs with zero relative helicity have a supperposition of TG flows and runs with $h\approx 0.95$ have a supperposition of ABC flows. The initial energy spectrum from $k=4$ to $14$ was proportional to $k^{-4}$, leaving enough spectral space to allow for direct and inverse transfer of energy. All the runs were extended for over 40 turnover times, and the dissipative range was properly resolved. Times in Table \[table:runs\] and in the figures are expressed in units of the turnover time at $t=0$, $T=L/U$, where $L\approx 2\pi/k_0 = 2\pi/4$ is the initial integral scale of the flow and $U\approx 1$ is the initial r.m.s. velocity.
Several Reynolds, Rossby, and Ekman numbers can be defined for the runs. We will consider here the Reynolds number based on the integral scale $Re = UL/\nu$, and the accompanying Rossby number $Ro = U/(2 \Omega L)$. The integral scale is defined as $L = 2\pi \int{E(k) k^{-1} dk}/E$ where $E(k)$ is the isotropic energy spectrum and $E$ is the total energy. The Ekman number is then defined as $E_k=Ro/Re$. At $t=0$ runs in set A have $Re = 1047$ and runs in set B have $Re = 2244$. At the same time the Rossby number is $Ro = 0.08$ for runs A3, A4, and B1-B2; the initial Ekman number is then $E_k = 7.6 \times 10^{-5}$ in runs A3 and A4, and $E_k = 3.6 \times 10^{-5}$ in runs B1-B2. Values of the controlling parameters for each run at the time of maximum dissipation $t^*$ are given in Table \[table:runs\].
It is also convenient to introduce a micro-scale Rossby number as $Ro^{\omega} = \omega/(2 \Omega)$ [@Jacquin90]. This number can be interpreted as the ratio of the convective to the Coriolis acceleration at the Taylor scale, a scale characteristic of the turbulent inertial range. In order for anisotropies to develop in the simulations, the Rossby number $Ro$ must be small enough for the rotation to affect the free decaying turbulence, but the micro-Rossby $Ro^{\omega}$ must be larger than one for scrambling effects of inertial waves not to completely damp the nonlinear terms (which leads to a pure exponencial viscous decay) [@Cambon97]. We are thought interested in simulations with moderate rotation rates to ensure $Ro \lesssim 1$ and with $Re$ large enough to have enough scale separation between the energy-containing and the dissipative scale. Note in Table \[table:runs\] how $Ro$ and $Ro^{\omega}$ are one order of magnitude apart in all runs at time $t^*$. This difference is sustained in time in the runs during the self-similar energy decay.
. ![Energy evolution for runs A1 (solid), A2 (dotted), B1 (dashed) and B2 (dot-dashed). Runs A1 and A2 have $\Omega=0$ and decay with the same rate independently of the helicity content. When rotation is turned on the decay rates differ. Inset: enstrophy evolution for runs A1 and A2.[]{data-label="fig:time1"}](fig1 "fig:"){width="8cm"}
Figure \[fig:time1\] shows the time history of the energy and enstrophy in runs A1, A2, B1-B2. In all runs there is a self-similar decay after the time $t^*$. Runs A3 and A4 (not shown) decay respectively as runs B1 and B2, although the time span of the self-similar stage is shorter. In both runs with $\Omega=0$, the energy decays as $\sim t^{-2}$. As will be discussed later, this exponent corresponds to the decay of a flow with constant integral length [@Biferale03].
The presence of helicity in run A2 doesn’t seem to affect the self-similar decay of turbulence, as predicted in Ref. [@Kraichnan73]. This is in good agreement with the fact that helicity doesn’t change the spectral index of the energy in non-rotating turbulence [@group1]. However, the self-similar decay in run A2 starts at a later time, as also previously reported in Ref. [@Morinishi01]. This is associated with the slow-down in the generation of small-scales in helical flows [@Lesieur], which results in a longer time to reach the maximum of dissipation in run A2 (see the inset in Fig. \[fig:time1\]).
In runs with rotation (A3, A4, B1 and B2), a transient is also observed before $t^*$. Then, self-similar decays with different power laws for the energy are found in all runs. Runs A3 and B1 have a decay near $t^{-1}$ [@group3; @bellet], while the runs with maximum helicity (A4 and B2) follow a decay slightly faster than $t^{-1/3}$. Contrary to the non-rotating case, we can appreciate now how the presence of initial helicity changes the self-similar energy decay.
![(a) Isotropic energy spectrum for run B2 at times $t \approx 2$ (thin), $t \approx 12$ (thick) and $t \approx 30$ (dot-dashed). At early times the spectrum follows a $\sim k^{-2.5}$ power-law (slope shown as a reference) and becames later dominated by the piling up of energy in the large scales. Inset: Isotropic energy spectrum for run B2. A $k^{-2}$ slope is plotted for reference. (b) Energy (thin) and helicity (thick) normalized fluxes for run B2 at times $t \approx 5$ (solid) and $t \approx 13$ (dashed) respectively. Inset: Energy flux for run B1 at times $t \approx 2$ (solid) and $t \approx 11$ (dashed).[]{data-label="fig:espectros"}](fig2a "fig:"){width="8cm" height="4cm"} ![(a) Isotropic energy spectrum for run B2 at times $t \approx 2$ (thin), $t \approx 12$ (thick) and $t \approx 30$ (dot-dashed). At early times the spectrum follows a $\sim k^{-2.5}$ power-law (slope shown as a reference) and becames later dominated by the piling up of energy in the large scales. Inset: Isotropic energy spectrum for run B2. A $k^{-2}$ slope is plotted for reference. (b) Energy (thin) and helicity (thick) normalized fluxes for run B2 at times $t \approx 5$ (solid) and $t \approx 13$ (dashed) respectively. Inset: Energy flux for run B1 at times $t \approx 2$ (solid) and $t \approx 11$ (dashed).[]{data-label="fig:espectros"}](fig2b "fig:"){width="8cm" height="4cm"}
The time evolution is accompanied by a change in the shape of the energy spectrum (see Fig. \[fig:espectros\](a)). While the runs without rotation show at $t^*$ and during the self-similar decay an spectrum consistent with Kolmogorov scaling in both the energy and the helicity, runs with rotation show different scaling laws. Run B1 (which has a larger scale separation than run A3) shows an isotropic energy spectrum compatible with $k^{-2}$ (the anisotropic energy spectrum is also compatible with a $k_\perp^{-2}$ scaling) [@muller; @MininniPress]. On the other hand, the energy spectrum in run B2 is slightly steeper than in run B1, while the helicity spectrum in this run is shallower than the energy spectrum. The product of both spectra is consistent with a $k^{-4}$ scaling law, as predicted using phenomenology for rotating helical flows in [@MininniPress].
In the runs with rotation, a change in the small-scale spectrum is observed at $t \approx 20$. As energy piles up at the largest available scale in the box and column-like structures form in the velocity, the small-scale energy spectrum becomes steeper. This is accompanied by a decrease in the decay rate of the energy (see Fig. \[fig:time1\]). This process is reminiscent of the change observed in the free-decay of two-dimensional turbulence, when the coalescence of large-scale vortices at late times leads to a steeper energy spectrum and a change in the self-similar decay [@McWilliams84]
Runs A1 and A2 developt direct energy fluxes toward small-scales while the rotating non-helical runs (A3 and B1) show both a direct and an inverse energy cascade (see the inset of Fig. \[fig:espectros\] (b)). In the helical runs (Fig. \[fig:espectros\] (b)), at $t \approx 2$ we observe maximum flux of energy and helicity toward smaller scales, evidenciating both energy and helicity have a direct cascade. However, the helicity flux is larger than the direct energy flux. Later, an inverse cascade of energy can be clearly identified from the negative energy flux at large scales. At $t \approx 13$, the coexistence of both an inverse cascade of energy and direct cascades of energy and helicity is observed.
![Ratio of the energy in modes with $k_{||}=0$ to the total energy in runs B1 (dashed) and B2 (solid). Despite the different initial conditions, the curves grow monotonically to 1, showing a transfer of energy to perpendicular modes. Inset: time evolution of the Shebalin angle for the same runs.[]{data-label="fig:ani1"}](fig3){width="8cm"}
Although Figs. \[fig:espectros\] (a) and (b) show the isotropic spectra and fluxes, the flows in the rotating case are anisotropic. Most of the energy in the spectra is in modes perpendicular to the axis of rotation, and the anisotropic spectum $E(k_\perp)$ and flux $\Pi(k_\perp)$ look similar to the ones previously discussed. We present instead some global indications of the development of anisotropies. Figure \[fig:ani1\] shows the ratio of the energy in perpendicular modes (i.e., modes with $k_{||}=0$) to the total energy in runs B1 and B2. Differences at early times are due to differemt initial conditions. However, it can be seen that both curves grow monotonically to a value near 1, indicating the flows evolve toward anisotropic states as the energy is transferred to perpendicular modes [@group2].
A measure of anisotropies in the small-scale fluctuations is given by the Shebalin angle, defined as $$\tan^2\theta=2 \frac {\sum_{k=1}^{k_{max}}{k_{\perp}^2E(k_{\perp})}}{\sum_{k=1}^{k_{max}}{k_{\parallel}^2E(k_{\parallel})}},
\label{eq:shebalin}$$ The evolution of this angle in runs B1 and B2 can be seen in the inset of Fig. \[fig:ani1\]. It grows monotonically although in run B2 it reaches a maximum at $t \approx 12$ and then seems to saturate. A similar behavior is observed for $L_{\parallel}$ (not shown) which again grows monotically in B1 but reaches a maximum in B2 at aproximately the same time. In all cases, $\tan^2\theta>>2$ which corresponds to anisotropic flows.
The increase of the correlation lengths, together with the growth of $E(k_{||}=0)/E$ and of $\tan^2\theta$ speaks of anisotropization of the flows This tendency towards two-dimensionalization is confirmed by exploring the flows in real space. Fig. \[fig:columnas\] shows visualizations of the r.m.s. vorticity with superimposed velocity field lines for runs A3 and A4 at late times ($t \approx 45$). In both cases, a strong anisotropy is observed with large scale column-like structures in the vorticity (similar structures are observed if energy density is visualized instead). However, a significant difference in the geometry of the flow in the columns is observed between runs A3 and A4 . While the flow in the columns of the helical run is strongly helical (the flow goes either up or down in the entire column, thus giving helical velocity field lines), the columns of the non-helical run have no net helicity (the flow goes up and down inside the same column). This indicates that even at late times, the properties of the emerging structures in rotating flows depend on the initial helicity content.
![(Color online) Visualizations of the r.m.s. vorticity for $t \approx 45$ with superimposed velocity field lines for runs A3 (right) and A4 (left). Cuts of $v_z$ and $H$ on a plane perpendicular to are shown. The color table gives the amplitudes normalized to the maximum of each quantity.[]{data-label="fig:columnas"}](fig4){width="8cm"}
The results presented so far show a novel and distinct evolution in the free decay of helical and non-helical flows when rotation is present. These differences can be understood in terms of a simple phenomenological theory. For the non-rotating cases we make use of the classical Kolmogorov phenomenology which leads to the well known energy spectrum $E(k) \sim \epsilon^{2/3}k^{-5/3}$, where $\epsilon$ represents the energy dissipation rate. From the Navier-Stokes equation it is easy to show that for a freely-decaying flow $dE/dt \sim E^{3/2}/L$ which leads to a self-similar decay law $E(t) \sim t^{-2}$ if the integral scale is assumed constant [@Biferale03; @group5].
In the case of rotating non-helical flows, it is often assumed that $E(k) \sim \epsilon^{1/2}\Omega^{1/2}k^{-2}$ (for simplicity, we use the isotropic wavenumber $k$, although the arguments here can be easily generalized to the anisotropic case replacing $k$ by $k_\perp$). This spectrum was observed in simulations [@muller], and obtained from closures [@bellet]. It can also be derived from phenomenological arguments assuming the inertial waves slow down the energy cascade [@Zhou95]. Using this spectrum it follows that $dE/dt \sim (E/L)^{2}$ resulting in a decay law $E(t) \sim t^{-1}$.
The novel case of rotating helical flows differs from the previous two cases. The direct transfer is dominated by the helicity cascade. Writting the helicity flux as $\delta \sim h_l/(\Omega \tau_l^2)$ where $h_l$ is the helicity at the scale $l$ and $\tau_l$ the eddie turnover time, leads to spectra $E(k) \sim k^{-n}$ and $H(k) \sim k^{n-4}$, where $n=5/2$ for the case of maximum helicity [@MininniPress]. In this case, dimensional analysis leads to $E(t) \sim \epsilon^{1/4}\Omega^{5/4}k^{-5/2}$ and to $E(t) \sim t^{-1/3}$. Note that for flows with initial helicity between zero and the maximum, the decay rate is between $-2$ and $-1/3$. A run with relative helicity of $ h \approx 0.4$ was done to verify this.
The results indicate that helical and non-helical rotating flows differ in their scaling laws and decay rates. This is different than the case of non-rotating flows where helicity doesn’t change the energy scaling. The observed differences indicate that helical rotating flows must be studied in detail, and open new directions in the study of rotating turbulence. This can also be the starting point to elucidate the actual role helicity plays in the decay of flows in nature where rotation is often relevant [@Lilly86].
[*Computer time provided by NCAR and CECAR. The authors acknowledge support from grant UBACYT X468/08. PDM is a member of the Carrera del Investigador Científico of CONICET. Flow visualizations were done using VAPOR [@vapor].*]{}
[10]{}
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'Nonlinear forces allow motion of a mechanical oscillator to be squeezed below the zero-point motion. Of existing methods, mechanical parametric amplification is relatively accessible, but previously thought to be limited to 3dB of squeezing in the steady state. We consider the effect of applying continuous weak measurement and feedback to this system. If the parametric drive is optimally detuned from resonance, correlations between the quadratures of motion allow unlimited steady-state squeezing. Compared to back-action evasion, we demonstrate that the measurement strength, temperature and efficiency requirements for quantum squeezing are significantly relaxed.'
author:
- 'A. Szorkovszky'
- 'A.C. Doherty'
- 'G.I. Harris'
- 'W.P. Bowen'
title: Mechanical squeezing via parametric amplification and weak measurement
---
Recent experiments have demonstrated impressive progress in cooling towards the ground state and measuring the zero-point motion of mechanical oscillators. This brings within reach the observation of nonclassical phonon states, with applications in quantum information and tests of quantum mechanics[@blencowe1]. The most successful systems to date involve cryogenically cooled high frequency oscillators strongly coupled to optical or microwave fields[@teufel; @anets]. However, techniques to manipulate quantum states and investigate nonclassical behaviour of phonons, apart from creating single phonon states[@oconnell], are less well developed.
A squeezed state, in which the variance of one quadrature of motion is below the zero-point motion, is the most accessible of quantum resources in optomechanical systems. This can be achieved, for example, by resolved sideband cooling using squeezed or modulated input light[@jahne; @mari]. Also promising is squeezing via back-action evading measurement (BAE)[@clerk], which is close to being realized[@hertzberg]. These schemes would allow for ultra-sensitive force detection[@caves] and normal mode entanglement[@tian] but are constrained by the requirement of strong coupling to the optical mode. Additional downsides are the requirement of ultra-low temperatures and the side-effect of parametric instability due to strong radiation pressure[@hertzberg].
Electrostatic forces, on the other hand, are strong enough to create nonclassical states in an oscillator by driving it into the nonlinear regime[@blencowe1]. It has been predicted that micro- and nano-electromechanical systems (MEMS/NEMS) can be engineered in this way to excite arbitrary Fock states[@rips] and induce macroscopic quantum tunnelling[@sillanpaa]. In a similar fashion, mechanical squeezing can be achieved via mechanical parametric amplification (MPA)[@rugar]. MPA exploits nonlinearities in the electrostatic driving field [@unterreithmeier], the resonator’s intrinsic motion[@almog] or a coupled charge qubit[@suh]. A periodic modulation in the oscillator’s spring constant at twice its resonance frequency gives rise to an in-phase amplified quadrature and an out-of-phase damped quadrature. The amplified gain approaches infinity at threshold, whereas the squeezing due to damping is limited to a factor of one half. This is a long-standing problem that also limits the intracavity variance of an optical parametric oscillator[@collett]. While there are non-equilibrium schemes that allow stronger squeezing in MPA[@blencowe2; @galve], to our knowledge there have been no previous proposals to overcome this limit in the steady state.
![\[scheme\]a) Schematic of DMPA for an optomechanical system with capacitive modulation of the spring constant $k$. The measurement is mixed at $\omega_m+\Delta$ to provide the two position quadratures. b) Phase space diagrams (not to scale) depicting unequal variance of orthogonal quadratures as noise ellipses. Shown is a thermal state in a frame rotating at $\omega_m$ as a parametric drive, measurement and detuning are turned on. Darker ellipses indicate conditional variance.](scheme.eps){width="8cm"}
Here, we consider a mechanical oscillator with detuned parametric driving and continuous quantum measurement. Such a scheme is relevant to MEMS/NEMS and optomechanical systems subject to electromechanical forces, as shown in Fig. \[scheme\]a. Our approach is similar to that of [@woolley], where resonant parametric driving and resolved sideband cooling are combined with quantum measurement, allowing the inference of mechanical squeezing. Our detuned MPA (or DMPA) approach is illustrated in Fig. \[scheme\]b. The parametric drive amplifies the noise of one quadrature of motion, increasing the information obtained by continuous weak measurement. Detuning the drive from resonance causes the quadratures to rotate such that the measurement of the amplified quadrature contains information about the fluctuations of the squeezed quadrature, thereby further reducing its conditional uncertainty.
We find that while measurement back-action degrades the squeezing from a resonant parametric pump, a continuous weak measurement *enhances* the conditional squeezing if the pump is optimally detuned. This can be made unconditional by applying appropriate negative feedback based on the measurement[@wiseman]. Our model predicts that current experimental parameters can produce quadrature squeezing more than 3dB below the zero-point motion without requiring an initial ground state or perfect detector efficiency. In addition, the measurement can be orders of magnitude weaker than that required for quantum squeezing via back-action evasion methods.
The system is described by the Hamiltonian for an oscillator where the spring constant $k_0=m\omega_m^2$ is modulated with amplitude $k_r$ at frequency $\omega_d = 2(\omega_m +\Delta)$, $$H = \frac{\hat p^2}{2m} + \frac{\hat x^2}{2}[k_0 + k_r \cos(\omega_d t + 2\theta)]\; ,$$ where $\omega_m$ is the mechanical resonance and $m$ is the effective mass. If the continuous measurement of position $x$ is fed into a phase-sensitive mixer such as a lock-in amplifier (see Fig. \[scheme\]a), as typically done in experiments[@rugar], the quadrature amplitudes $X$ and $Y$ become the variables of interest, where $\sqrt{m\omega_m/\hbar}\hat x = X\cos(\omega_m t) + Y\sin(\omega_m t)$. The phase $\theta$ between the parametric drive and lock-in detector defines the amplification axis in X-Y space. The corresponding quantum operators are $\hat X = (\hat a + \hat a^\dag)/\sqrt{2}$ and $\hat Y = -i(\hat a - \hat a^\dag)/\sqrt{2}$. In these variables, $V_X=\langle\hat X^2\rangle=V_Y=\langle\hat Y^2\rangle=1/2$ in the ground state due to the uncertainty principle. We assume low damping $\gamma\ll \omega_m$ corresponding to a high mechanical quality, and small perturbation of the spring constant $k_r\ll k_0$, so that a rotating wave approximation can be made in the interaction picture at the frequency $\omega_d$, giving $$\label{ham}
\tilde H = -\hbar\Delta \hat a^\dag\hat a + i\hbar \frac{\chi}{2}(e^{2i\theta}\hat a^2-e^{-2i\theta}\hat a^{\dag2}) \; .$$ The second term in this Hamiltonian takes the form of a squeezing operator proportional to $\chi=\omega_m k_r/2k_0$. The nonlinearity $\chi$ can be interpreted as the mechanical frequency shift due to a change in spring constant by $k_r$.
The conditional evolution of the system, including back-action and thermal noise, is described by a stochastic master equation for continuous position measurement[@jacobs]. If the measurement rate $\mu$ is small compared to $\omega_m$, the rotating wave approximation can be performed on this master equation using the method of Ref. [@wiseman2]. The expectation value of an arbitrary observable $\hat A$ is then found to evolve as $$\begin{aligned}
\label{master}
\mathrm{d}\langle\hat A\rangle & = & -\frac{i}{\hbar}\langle[\hat A,\tilde H]\rangle\,\mathrm{d}t + [2\gamma N + \mu]\langle\mathcal{D}[\hat a^\dag]\hat A\rangle\,\mathrm{d}t\nonumber \\
& & + [2\gamma(N+1)+\mu]\langle\mathcal{D}[\hat a]\hat A\rangle\,\mathrm{d}t \\
& & + \sqrt{\eta \mu}\langle\mathcal{H}[\hat X]\hat A\rangle\,\mathrm{d}W_X + \sqrt{\eta\mu}\langle\mathcal{H}[\hat Y]\hat A\rangle\,\mathrm{d}W_Y \; , \nonumber\end{aligned}$$ where $N$ is the mean thermal phonon number, $\eta$ is the quantum efficiency and $\mathrm{d}W_X$ and $\mathrm{d}W_Y$ are uncorrelated Wiener processes corresponding to the two position quadratures[@wiseman2]. It is assumed that the measurement signal also has no thermal fluctuations, which is valid for optical readout or a well-cooled signal amplifier. The superoperators $\mathcal{D}$ and $\mathcal{H}$ are defined as $$\begin{aligned}
\mathcal{D}[\hat a]\hat A & = & \hat a^\dag\hat A\hat a - \frac{1}{2}(\hat a^\dag \hat a\hat A + \hat A\hat a^\dag \hat a) \nonumber \\
\mathcal{H}[\hat a]\hat A & = & \hat a\hat A + \hat A\hat a^\dag - \langle \hat a+\hat a^\dag\rangle\hat A \; . \nonumber\end{aligned}$$ Setting $\theta=\Delta=0$ and substituting $\hat X$ and $\hat Y$ for $\hat A$ in Eq. (\[master\]) results in damping rates of $\gamma+\chi$ and $\gamma-\chi$ respectively for the two quadratures. When there is no nonlinearity ($\chi=0$), these reduce to the bare damping rate $\gamma$ as expected. There exists a threshold for self-oscillation at $\chi=\gamma$, where the damping of $\hat Y$ is zero, corresponding to infinite gain. At this threshold, the damping of $\hat X$ is double its original value, resulting in a gain of $1/2$ and therefore a noise squeezing limit of 3dB.
Non-zero detuning $\Delta$ of the pump (and lock-in reference) from resonance rotates the phase of the oscillations, creating elliptical trajectories of the mean values and resulting in a shift in the steady-state squeezing axis[@carmichael]. Most importantly, as we will show, correlations between the quadratures allow the squeezed quadrature to be more efficiently localized by measurement. The modified below-threshold condition is $\chi^2 < \Delta^2 + \gamma^2$ where above this, the detuning and damping are insufficient to keep the mean values decaying to zero, causing instability. With sufficient detuning, this theory is limited only by the rotating wave approximation, which requires the condition $\chi \ll \omega_m$.
Near threshold, the squeezing is maximized at an angle approaching $-\pi/4$ [@carmichael]. Therefore, for simplicity we set the drive phase $\theta=\pi/4$ so that the squeezing axis approximately corresponds to $X$. The evolution of the variances $V_X$,$V_Y$ and covariance $C$ can be derived from the master equation using Itō calculus and the relations $$\begin{gathered}
\mathrm{d}V_A = \mathrm{d}\langle \hat A^2\rangle - 2\langle \hat A\rangle\mathrm{d}\langle \hat A\rangle - (\mathrm{d}\langle \hat A\rangle)^2 \nonumber \\
\mathrm{d}C = \frac{1}{2}\mathrm{d}\langle \hat X\hat Y\!+\!\hat Y\hat X\rangle \!-\! \langle \hat X\rangle\mathrm{d}\langle \hat Y\rangle \!-\! \langle \hat Y\rangle\mathrm{d}\langle \hat X\rangle \!-\! \mathrm{d}\langle \hat X\rangle\mathrm{d}\langle \hat Y\rangle \nonumber\end{gathered}$$ All terms involving $\mathcal{D}$ in Eq. (\[master\]), including thermal noise and a back-action term $\mu$, add to these position variances. The superoperator $\mathcal{H}$, however, results in the conditional variance decreasing as the effective measurement rate $\eta\mu$ increases. Setting the differentials above to zero yields the steady state solutions as three coupled equations $$\begin{gathered}
\label{var1} V_X = \frac{\sqrt{\gamma^2 + z - 8\eta\mu C(\Delta - \chi) - (4\eta\mu C)^2} - \gamma}{4\eta\mu} \\
\label{var2} V_Y = \frac{\sqrt{\gamma^2 + z + 8\eta\mu C(\Delta + \chi) - (4\eta\mu C)^2} - \gamma}{4\eta\mu} \\
\label{var3} C = \frac{\chi(V_Y+V_X)-\Delta(V_Y-V_X)}{4\eta\mu(V_Y+V_X)+2\gamma} \; .\end{gathered}$$ Here, the conditioning parameter $z=8\eta\mu\gamma(N+N_{BA}+1/2)$ characterises how well the motion is detected and $N_{BA}=\mu/2\gamma$ is the additional phonon number due to back-action for continuous measurement. When the pump is off, the covariance vanishes and both quadratures have the standard back-action limited variance conditioned on the measurement result $$\label{meas}
V_0 = \frac{\sqrt{\gamma^2 + z} - \gamma}{4\eta\mu}\; , \\$$ which in the weak measurement limit ($\mu\ll\gamma$) gives the expected thermal state variance $V_T = N + 1/2$. The conditional variance decreases with stronger measurement and saturates at the quantum limit of $1/2$ in the limit $\mu\gg\gamma$, where the ground state motion can be resolved.
The parametric pump creates a non-zero covariance, or squeezing at an angle of $\pi/4$ to the $X$ and $Y$ quadratures, while the detuning rotates the squeezing axis so that $V_X<V_Y$. For given parameters, there exists a detuning $\Delta_{opt}$ that optimally uses the measurement to minimise $V_X$. When the measurement is switched off ($z=0$), this is exactly solvable as $\Delta_{opt}-\chi = \gamma$ with a variance limit of $V_0/2$, agreeing with time domain analysis of intracavity parametric squeezing in optics[@collett].
A more general analytic result can be obtained for the optimal squeezing in the limit that the conditioning parameter $z\gg \gamma^2$, corresponding to high temperature and/or strong measurement. Solving for the minimum squeezed variance $V_X$ over all detunings results in the solution $$\label{varsol}
V_{Xopt} \approx \frac{V_0}{2}\sqrt{2 + 3(\Delta'_{opt}-\chi')^2 - \frac{1}{(\Delta'_{opt}-\chi')^2}} \; ,$$ where dashed parameters are normalized by $\sqrt{\gamma^2+z}$ and the optimal detuning $\Delta_{opt}$ is given by $$\label{deltasol}
\Delta_{opt}'-\chi' = \frac{1}{6}(\mathrm{Re}\{G\} + \sqrt{3}\mathrm{Im}\{G\}-3\chi') \; ,$$ with $$\label{deltasol2}
G = \left(27\chi'^3 + 6\sqrt{3}i\sqrt{27\chi'^4+36\chi'^2+16}\right)^{\frac{1}{3}} \; .$$
![\[hightemp\]Optimal $X$ quadrature squeezing and (inset) optimal detuning as a function of nonlinearity $\chi'$. Dotted lines: numerical solutions for measurement strength $\mu/\gamma = 0.1$ and mean phonon number $N=0,1,10,100,1000$. Solid lines: analytic solutions for no measurement (upper) and for the limit $z\gg\gamma^2$ (lower).](hightemp.eps){width="8cm"}
It can be seen from Eqs (\[varsol\]-\[deltasol2\]) that $\Delta_{opt}'-\chi'$ approaches 1 in the weak pump limit $\chi\ll\gamma$, giving $V_{Xopt}=V_0$ as expected. In the strong pump limit, $\Delta_{opt}'-\chi'\rightarrow1/\sqrt{3}$ and hence $V_X/V_0\rightarrow 0$. This shows that with quantum measurement, improvement on the conditional variance is not bounded by $1/2$ and perfect squeezing is possible with sufficient nonlinearity $\chi'$. Fig. \[hightemp\] compares the analytic solutions for $V_{Xopt}$ and $\Delta_{opt}$ to numerical solutions for a fixed measurement strength of $\mu/\gamma=0.1$ and various initial phonon numbers $N$. The analytic solutions fit well at high temperatures and provide a lower bound to the squeezing.
The normalized nonlinearity $\chi'$ is a useful figure of merit for classical squeezing at high temperature. In the limit where back-action is negligible this can be expressed, in terms of mechanical properties, as $$\chi' \approx \frac{Q}{4\sqrt{2N\eta\mu/\gamma}}\frac{k_r}{k_0} \; ,$$ where $Q$ is the mechanical quality factor $\omega_m/\gamma$. Hence for mechanical squeezing, a high Q and low spring constant $k_0$ is desirable. If $N\eta\mu/\gamma$ is large (i.e. the thermal noise is well transduced) the statistics are dominated by the measurement conditioning and the effect of the parametric drive is reduced. However, lower temperature always results in lower absolute variance $V_{Xopt}$ as expected.
For low initial temperatures and weak measurement, $z<\gamma^2$ so the above solutions are no longer applicable. Therefore, in order to investigate *quantum* squeezing ($V_X<1/2$), Eqs (\[var1\]-\[var3\]) were solved numerically for initial temperatures near the ground state. The absolute variance $V_X$ is shown in Fig. \[gndstate\] for $\chi/\gamma=50$, compared to that achievable by BAE (given by Eq. (\[meas\]) where $N_{BA}=0$ [@clerk]). For relatively weak measurements, the DMPA method produces variances well below the zero-point motion. This method is also robust to heating, with squeezing possible from $N<5$ at $\mu/\gamma\approx1$. At this measurement strength, a BAE scheme would require $N<0.5$. Furthermore, the need for an often impractical modulation of the measurement strength is eliminated.
![\[gndstate\] Optimal quantum squeezing generated by DMPA with $\chi/\gamma=50$ (a,c) and by BAE (b,d). $V_{Xopt}$ is shown as a function of $\mu/\gamma$ and $N$ in (a,b) for $\eta=1$, and as a function of $\mu/\gamma$ and $\eta$ in (c,d) for $N=0$. Shaded areas denote squeezing below the zero-point motion (light) and the standard 3dB MPA limit (dark).](contours.eps){width="8cm"}
It should be noted that in the limit of very low temperatures and strong measurement, where back-action degrades the DMPA squeezing, BAE is preferable. The turning point occurs at a measurement strength of $\mu/\gamma \approx 0.4$ for $N=0$. At higher temperatures, stronger measurement is required to reach the back-action dominated regime. For $N=0$ and $\chi/\gamma=50$, 6dB of squeezing is achievable using DMPA, twice that achievable without detuning and measurement. This is robust against detection inefficiency, with a reduction to 40% efficiency only degrading the squeezing to 5dB. Unconditional squeezing can be achieved by using a linear feedback force (e.g. from a separate electrode) to stabilize the mean values[@wiseman]. This relies on high mechanical Q so that the delay in converting momentum feedback into physical displacement can be neglected.
We have shown that a detuned parametric amplifier with weak measurement can vastly reduce the uncertainty of one quadrature of motion of a mechanical oscillator. At low initial temperatures, this manifests as quantum squeezing. This method therefore opens up the possibility of generating mechanical squeezed states in many systems, namely those that can be cooled to low phonon occupations and parametrically driven independently of the measurement apparatus.
High frequency mechanical oscillators approaching the GHz regime have the well-known advantage of being able to be cooled to very low phonon numbers[@oconnell]. In addition, the small scale involved facilitates a lower intrinsic spring constant $k_0$, especially with extreme dimensional ratios such those found in oscillators based on carbon nanotubes[@huttel]. Many current NEMS resonators are already capable of above-threshold parametric amplification and are at high enough frequency to be cooled near the ground state. For example, the 9MHz oscillator used in Ref. [@unterreithmeier] can reach $\chi/\gamma=50$ with a drive amplitude of $0.6$V. Other suitable examples could involve using electrostatic forces to drive NEMS resonators coupled to optical cavities[@anets; @rips], or even to drive the internal mechanical modes of optical cavities [@lee; @sridaran]. These setups allow resolved sideband cooling of the mechanical mode[@schliesser] as well as the necessary parametric drive.
This research was funded by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence CE110001013 and Discovery Project DP0987146.
[27]{}ifxundefined \[1\][ ifx[\#1]{} ]{}ifnum \[1\][ \#1firstoftwo secondoftwo ]{}ifx \[1\][ \#1firstoftwo secondoftwo ]{}““\#1””@noop \[0\][secondoftwo]{}sanitize@url \[0\][‘\
12‘\$12 ‘&12‘\#12‘12‘\_12‘%12]{}@startlink\[1\]@endlink\[0\]@bib@innerbibempty [****, ()](\doibase 10.1016/j.physrep.2003.12.005) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.061804) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1038/nature09898) [****, ()](\doibase
10.1038/nature08967) [****, ()](\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevA.79.063819) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.213603) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1088/1367-2630/10/9/095010) [****, ()](\doibase
10.1038/nphys1479) [****, ()](\doibase
10.1103/RevModPhys.52.341) @noop [****, ()]{} @noop [ ()]{} @noop [ ()]{} [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.699) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1038/nature07932) [****, ()](\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.078103) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1021/nl101844r) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevA.30.1386) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1016/S0921-4526(99)01862-1) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.180501) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.062303) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevA.49.1350) @noop [****, ()]{} [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevA.47.1652) @noop [****, ()]{} [****, ()](\doibase
10.1021/nl900612h) [****, ()](\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.123604) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1364/OE.19.009020) @noop [****, ()]{}
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We show that the boundary curves (profiles) in ${{\mathbb R}}^2$ of the generalized projections of a body in ${{\mathbb R}}^3$ uniquely determine a large class of shapes, and that sparse profile data, combined with projection volume (brightness) data, can be used to reconstruct the shape and the spin state of a body. We also present an optimal strategy for the relative weighting of the data modes in the inverse problem, and derive the maximum compatibility estimate (MCE) that corresponds to the maximum likelihood or maximum a posteriori estimates in the case of a single data mode. MCE is not explicitly dependent on the noise levels, scale factors or numbers of data points of the complementary data modes, and can be determined without the mode weight parameters. We present a solution method well suitable for adaptive optics images in particular, and discuss various choices of regularization functions.'
author:
- |
Mikko Kaasalainen\
Department of Mathematics\
Tampere University of Technology\
P.O. Box 553, 33101 Tampere\
Finland
title: Maximum compatibility estimates and shape reconstruction with boundary curves and volumes of generalized projections
---
AMS subject classifications: 68U05, 65D18, 52B10, 49N45, 65J22, 85-08\
Keywords: Computational geometry, three-dimensional polytopes, inverse problems, computational methods in astronomy
Introduction
============
Constructing the shape model of a three-dimensional object or a surface is often based on images obtained at various viewing geometries. This is the standard case in human and robot vision as well as in cartography. When individual points on the surface can be identified in different images, one can directly solve for their position vectors and use this as a top-down basis for stereographic mapping or model construction. In many cases, however, the model construction reduces to an inverse problem rather than a cartographic one as the image information is based purely on the projections of the target in the viewing directions. When surface illumination and other effects are taken into account, we talk about [*generalized projections*]{} [@genproj] to distinguish these from simple shadow-like projections or silhouettes. As discussed in [@genproj], there are various types of such projections, ranging from the volume-like quantity of integrated brightness $L\in{{\mathbb R}}$ (generalization of the area of a shadow on a projection screen) to resolved images ${\cal I}\in{{\mathbb R}}^2\times{{\mathbb R}}$ (for one wavelength).
In this paper, we consider the case where images ${\cal I}(\omega,\omega_0)$ obtained at various viewing and illumination directions $\omega,\omega_0\in S^2$ are available, but the infomation in these images is only contained in the boundary curves between the dark background or a shadow and the illuminated portion of the target surface. This situation is typical for faraway objects in space for which low-resolution images are available via large telescopes through adaptive optics (AO) [@keck] or other deconvolution and image processing techniques. Due to the deconvolution process, the actual brightness levels of the pixels in these images tend to portray artificial and exaggerated features, so they are usually less reliable than profile contours, i.e., the locations of the light/dark boundary pixels [@carry1; @carry2].
As the coverage of viewing geometries is seldom wide enough to enable a full reconstruction of the model from images alone, we also consider the possibility of augmenting the image dataset with a set of measured brightnesses $L(\omega,\omega_0)$ of the target at various observing geometries. Subsets of these, measured within some time intervals, are called lightcurves. As discussed in [@aa]-[@genproj] (see also references therein), a global, usually convex, model of the target can be obtained from a large enough set of $L(\omega,\omega_0)$. The possibility to use images $\cal I$ both serves to reconstruct more details in the model and to use a combined dataset for successful modelling when neither the available $L$ nor $\cal I$ are sufficient alone.
The ratio of profile contour pixels to all pixels of the target is approximately $4/D$, where $D$ is a typical diameter of the target in pixels. For the largest few asteroid AO targets, $D$ is around 30. When $D$ is less than about 10, the location accuracy of the border pixels is not necessarily very much better than the brightness accuracy of the pixels, but on the other hand there is no particular loss in the number of information points when only borders are used. For higher $D$, border points are a smaller subset of available pixels, but now their location accuracy is far better than the brightness accuracy of all pixels [@carry1; @carry2].
The profile contours of the AO images are obtained as a solution of a separate inverse (or imaging) problem, where an approximation of the atmospheric point-spread function (PSF) is first used to deconvolve the raw image (with, e.g., connectedness of the processed image as a constraint), and the contours can be separately modelled with wavelet techniques [@carry1; @carry2; @keck]. This independence from the actual model of the target is advantageous in the sense that the assumptions and inevitable deficiencies of the model (particularly in the adopted light-scattering model on the surface [@iau]) do not affect the outcome of the AO image processing. On the other hand, from the methodological point of view, all information should usually be employed simultaneously when solving an inverse problem, so another approach would be to use the raw AO image data and the approximated PSF directly in model construction without separate image deconvolution. However, in practice it appears that the profile curve extraction procedure, in particular, retains valuable independent information [@carry1; @carry2], and the model deficiencies affect the fit deviation between the predicted and observed model profile curves less than they affect that between the full model and AO images. What is more, below we show that the profile curves convey almost as much information on the shape as the full images, so we can conclude that the two-step inversion of AO (and brightness) data is well justified.
The paper is organized in sections in the following manner. In Section 2 we study the information content of profile contours and show uniqueness results for the inverse problem of reconstructing shapes from these. Section 3 deals with the posing of the inverse problem and the choice of regularization functions. In Section 4, we discuss the weighting and maximum compatibility estimates for inverse problems with multiple data modes, and examples of the use of real brightness data $L$ and images $\cal I$ are presented in Section 5. Section 6 sums up.
Generalized profiles: uniqueness results
========================================
In this section, we define the concept of generalized profiles as boundary curves corresponding to generalized projections, and show that a large class of shapes is reconstructable from these. While many practical procedures for shape-from-profiles (also known as volume carving) and shape-from-shading are well known in, e.g., computer vision (see [@shadcar] and references therein) and cartography (clinometry), some of their geometric characteristics and the properties of the corresponding shape classes and inverse problems discussed here have not been previously stated in the mathematical literature, to the best of our knowledge.
Let us first look at classical profiles defined by one direction $\omega\in S^2$, i.e., $\omega_0=\omega$. The projection ${\cal P}(\omega,{\cal B})\in{{\mathbb R}}^2$ of a compact set ${\cal B}\in{{\mathbb R}}^3$ (a set of points on closed surfaces) in the direction $\omega\in S^2$ maps $x\in{\cal B}\rightarrow \varkappa\in\cal P$: =(
[ccc]{} 0&1&0\
0&0&1
)[R]{}\_y(-)[R]{}\_z () x, where $0<\vartheta<\pi,0\le\psi<2\pi$ are the polar coordinate angles defining $$\omega=(\sin\vartheta\cos\psi,\sin\vartheta\sin\psi,
\cos\vartheta),$$ and ${\sf R}_i(\alpha)$ is the rotation matrix corresponding to the rotation of the coordinate frame through angle $\alpha$ in the positive direction about the $i$-axis. Thus, e.g., ${\sf R}_z(\phi)$ is \_z()=(
[rrr]{}&&0\
-&&0\
0&0&1
).\[rz\] For $\vartheta=0$, $\varkappa_i=x_i,i=1,2$, and for $\vartheta=\pi$, $\varkappa_1=-x_1,\varkappa_2=x_2$. Only a half of $S^2$ is needed for defining $\omega$ as $$\varkappa_i(\omega)=(-1)^i\varkappa_i(-\omega).$$
For some definitions below, we need to give the three-dimensional position $x_\varkappa(\omega)\in{{\mathbb R}}^3$ of the planar points $\varkappa$: x\_()=[R]{}\_z(-)[R]{}\_y(-)(
[c]{}0\
\_1\
\_2
).
[**Definition 1.**]{} The [*profile*]{} ${\cal P}_\p (\omega,{\cal B})$ of $\cal B$ in the direction $\omega$ is the boundary of its projection ${\cal P}(\omega,{\cal B})$: $${\cal P}_\p(\omega,{\cal B})=\p{\cal P}(\omega,{\cal B})$$ (the specific notation ${\cal P}_\p$ is used for emphasis). More specifically, ${\cal P}_\p (\omega,{\cal B})$ is the mapping $x\rightarrow\varkappa$ from those points $x\in\cal B$ for which, for all lines $x+s\omega$ parametrized by $s$, \_(,[B]{}) ={ s:,>0: [P]{}(x+s;,), 0<0: x+s },\[aplus\] where $\nu(x)$ is the unit surface normal at $x$. The projection $\cal P$ of the boundary $\p{\cal A}_+$ is now the generalized profile:
[**Definition 5.**]{} The [*generalized profile*]{} of the body $\cal B$ in the direction $\omega$ and at illumination direction $\omega_0$ is \[,[A]{}\_+(,\_0;[B]{})\]= [P]{}\[,\_+(,\_0;[B]{})\].
The shape class $\cal G$ is not as straightforward to define as $\cal C$ and $\cal T$. We can, however, prove configurations allowing unique shape determination that illustrate its extension from $\cal T$.
[**Theorem 1.**]{} [*Assume that we know some parts $\cal K$ of a body $\cal B$ from profile measurements. There exist configurations in which unknown parts $\cal U$ of $\cal B$ not determinable from profiles can be uniquely determined from the generalized profiles of $\cal B$ by using the shadow boundaries of $\cal K$ on $\cal U$.*]{}
[*Proof.*]{} Assume that ${\cal H}_C({\cal B})$ is defined, and that it contains a planar section $\cal K$, and that $\cal B$ contains in this region an unknown concavity ${\cal U}$ (corresponding to ${\cal H}_C\setminus{\cal B}$). Also, assume that all points of $\cal U$ are seen from the viewing direction $\omega\bot\cal K$, and that the illumination direction $\omega_0$ lies in a plane $\bot\cal K$, with $\theta=\measuredangle(\omega_0,{\cal K})$. Then the planar edge curve of the concavity $\cal U$ can be determined when $\theta\rightarrow 0$: $$\p{\cal U}=\lim_{\theta\rightarrow 0}\p S(\theta):=\p S_0,$$ where $\p\cal S$ denotes the projection of the shadow boundary in the direction $\omega$ on the plane $\cal K$. At various $0<\theta\le\pi/2$, we can measure the shadow boundary projections $\p{\cal S}(\theta)$, and thus extract the projection $\p\tilde S(\theta)$ of the shadow boundary inside $\cal U$: $$\p\tilde S(\theta)=\p S(\theta)\setminus\p\hat S(\theta),\quad
\p\hat S(\theta):=\p S(\theta)\cap\p S_0.$$ Then the envelope in ${{\mathbb R}}^3$ of the intersection curves of the cylinder continuations of $\p\tilde S(\theta)$ in the directions of $\omega$ and $\omega_0$ $${\cal C}[\omega,\p\tilde S(\theta)]\cap {\cal C}[\omega_0,\p\hat S(\theta)]$$ uniquely constructs the surface of the concavity $\cal U$ (when $\cal U$ is suitably regular). $\square$
[**Theorem 2.**]{} [*There exist configurations in which unknown parts $\cal U$ of $\cal B$ can be uniquely determined by using their shadow boundaries on the known part $\cal K$.*]{}
[*Proof.*]{} Let $\cal B$ be a combination of a TCB $\cal E$ and any surface $\cal D$ (${\cal E}\cap{\cal D}=\emptyset$) that can be determined using profiles in the directions $\omega$ for which the profile intersection $${\cal Q}(\omega):={\cal P}(\omega,{\cal D})\cap{\cal P}(\omega,{\cal E})$$ vanishes, $\cal Q=\emptyset$ (the whole of $\cal D$ is in the known part $\cal K$). The unknown parts are assumed to be on $\cal E$ (they cannot be determined using the above $\omega$). Now the parts of profiles of $\cal E$ that merge with ${\cal P}(\omega,{\cal D})$ at some $\omega$, i.e., ${\cal Q}(\omega)\neq\emptyset$, are represented as shadows on $\cal D$ that we assume we can see from some directions $\omega'$. The full or partial profiles of $\p{\cal P}(\omega,{\cal E})$ for which $\p{\cal P}(\omega,{\cal E})\cap {\cal Q}=\emptyset$ can be determined as usual, and, with a known $\cal D$, the remaining parts $\p{\cal P}(\omega,{\cal E})\cap {\cal Q}\neq\emptyset$ can be determined from the shadows on $\cal D$. The intersection $$\p{\cal W}={\cal C}[\omega',\p S_p(\omega')]\cap{\cal D},$$ where ${\cal C}[\omega',\p S_p(\omega')]$ denotes the cylinder continuation corresponding to the observed projection of the shadow boundary of $\cal E$ on $\cal D$ in the direction $\omega'$, can be used to determine the projection ${\cal P}(\p{\cal W},\omega)$, which completes the missing parts of the needed profiles. Now we have constructed the set of full profiles of $\cal E$ at all $\omega\in S^2$, so $\cal E$ can be constructed as it is a TCB. $\square$
Continuing in a similar manner, we can construct more complex variations of the two cases above to explore the shape class $\cal G$. In practice, directions $(\omega,\omega_0)$ seldom cover $S^2\times S^2$ extensively or densely, so the shape is reconstructed within some resolution (discretization degree of the model) and a priori assumptions, as discussed below.
Inverse problem
===============
Let us now consider the inverse problem of determining the shape and spin state of a body $\cal B$ from some measured generalized profiles $\p{\cal P}[\omega_i,{\cal A}_+(\omega_i,\omega_{0i};{\cal B})]$ and the volumes $L(\omega_{0i},\omega_i)$ of generalized projections. We present a method that is suitable for typical ground-based astronomical data, i.e., the profiles are only obtained at restricted geometries and their resolution level is not high. When a dense coverage of geometries and high resolution are available (e.g., space probe missions), direct methods of computer vision and cartography are usually applicable.
Our goal is to construct a total goodness-of-fit measure $\chi^2_{\rm tot}$ \^2\_[tot]{}=\^2\_L+\_\^2\_+\_R g(P), where $L$ denotes lightcurves, $\p$ generalized profiles, and $R$ regularizing functions $g(P)$, where $P\in{{\mathbb R}}^p$ is the vector of model parameters. Regularization is discussed at the end of this section, and the determination of the weights $\lambda$ in section 4. We note here that the additional $g(P)$ make $\chi^2_{\rm tot}$ pseudo-$\chi^2$ as it no longer describes an underlying (assumed) Gaussian probability distribution (though $g(P)$ may be $\chi^2$-like in their functional form). When probability densities such as a posteriori distributions are constructed from $\chi^2_{\rm tot}$, one can assume $\chi^2$-distributions (of the form $e^{-c\chi^2}$) only for the data components, and other suitable (prior) distributions for the regularization components [@kaipio] such that the maximum of the a posteriori distribution occurs at $\arg\min\chi^2_{\rm tot}(P)$.
Throughout this paper, we do not include the conventional $1/\delta^2$-factor in $\chi^2$-forms, where $\delta$ is the expected (Gaussian) error variance (noise level), since $\delta$ is seldom known exactly, and it does not affect the determination of our point estimates which is the goal of this paper. Suitable parameters for Gaussian or other distribution widths can be inserted separately whenever we want to construct a distribution.
The volumes of generalized projections are also called total or disk-integrated brightnesses [@aa; @kaast; @genproj]: L(\_0,)=\_[[A]{}\_+]{} R(x;\_0,),(x) d(x) \_[[P]{}(,[A]{}\_+)]{} R\[P\^[-1]{}(,[A]{}\_+,);\_0,\] d\^2, where $\nu(x)$ and $d\sigma(x)$ are, respectively, the outward surface normal and surface patch of $\cal B$, $R(x;\omega_0,\omega)$ describes the intensity of scattered light at the point $x$ on the surface, $P^{-1}(\omega,{\cal A}_+,\varkappa)$ is the point in ${\cal A}_+$ corresponding to the projection point $\varkappa$, and $d^2\varkappa$ is the surface patch of the projection $\cal P$. In its basic form, \^2\_L=\_[i]{} \[L\^[(obs)]{}(\_[0i]{},\_i) -L\^[(mod)]{}(\_[0i]{},\_i)\]\^2\[lcchisq\] (assuming a constant noise level; see [@kaast] for modifications and variations of this). $L$-data on $S^2\times S^2$ uniquely determine a convex body and the solution is stable [@aa; @genproj], but $L$-data do not carry information on nonconvexities in most realistically available $S^2\times S^2$ geometries in practice [@durech]. Such information must be provided by AO or other techniques.
For many typical AO targets, the generalized profiles are starlike due to the proximity of $\omega$ and $\omega_0$ and some regularity of the target shape at global scale [@carry1; @carry2; @keck]. Then we can write $\chi^2_\p$ by considering, for each profile $i$, their observed and modelled maximal radii (from some point within the profile) on the projection plane $\varkappa=(\xi,\eta)\in{{\mathbb R}}^2$ at direction angles $\alpha_{ij}$ (starting from a chosen coordinate direction for positive $\xi$, $\eta=0$): \^2\_=\_[ij]{} \[r\_[max]{}\^[(obs)]{}(\_[ij]{}) -r\_[max]{}\^[(mod)]{}(\_[ij]{})\]\^2.\[aochisq\] As the accuracy of $r_{\rm max}^{\rm (obs)}$ is proportional to the size of the image, the sum (\[aochisq\]) automatically takes this weighting into account (of course, direct weighting due to varying noise levels can be used as well).
We now represent the body $\cal B$ as a polytope [@kaast]. Let two vertices $a$ and $b$ of a facet have projection points $(\xi_a,\eta_a)$, $(\xi_b,\eta_b)$, and $(\xi_0,\eta_0)$ be the point on the projection plane from which the radii and $\alpha$ are measured (this defines the profile offset that must be solved for in the inverse problem). With
[ll]{} A=-, &B=,\
C=\_a-\_b, &D=\_b-\_a,\
E=A\_0+B\_0, &F=\_b\_a-\_a\_b,
the intersection point of the radius line and the projection of the facet edge $ab$ is at =,=,\[intersect\] and, to be in the correct direction of $\alpha$ and between the points $a$ and $b$, the intersection point must satisfy (-\_a)(\_b-)0,&(-\_0)0,\
(-\_a)(\_b-)0&(-\_0)0. If $AD-BC=0$, the line in $\alpha$-direction is parallel to the line $ab$, so there is no intersection unless the lines coincide, i.e., either of the numerators in (\[intersect\]) vanishes.
The model $r_{\rm max}(\alpha)$ can now be determined by going through all eligible facet edges and their intersection points $\varkappa_{ab}(\alpha)$: r\_[max]{}\^[(mod)]{}()={\_[ab]{}()-\_0a,b\_+}, where ${\cal V}_+$ is the set of vertices of the facets ${\cal A}_+$ that are both visible and illuminated. The set ${\cal A}_+$ of (\[aplus\]) is determined by ray-tracing [@kaas01]. It is an approximation (correct to the order of the average facet area) of the actual visible and illuminated region, i.e., each facet either is or is not in ${\cal A}_+$ (judging by its centroid): projection lines of obstructing facets inside a facet are neglected when the facets are small enough.
The principle of using outer contours applies to AO data that do not generally show non-starlike or multiple contours (due to crater shadows) as the solar phase angles $\arccos\langle \omega,\omega_0\rangle$ are low and the resolution/deconvolution accuracy is not high. At high phase angles, even starlike bodies form non-starlike contours, and contours inside the outer contour appear in high-resolution images from probe flybys.
The outer contour $\p\cal O$ can be automatically derived for non-starlike shape models as well; such models can be constructed by, e.g., joining starlike submodels together, using a cylindrical coordinate frame [@kaast], or by determining the coordinates of a set of points with which a suitable surface (a new tessellation for each iteration) is defined via, e.g., mesh-free methods such as weighted/moving least squares [@levin]. For clarity, let us first assume that no other generalized profile contours exist outside $\p\cal O$. Denoting the edges of the facets of ${\cal A}_+$ by ${\cal E}_+$, $\p\cal O$ is constructed by the following algorithm:
[**1.**]{} Construct the set ${\cal F}_0\subset {\cal E}_+$ of the edges of ${\cal E}_+$ that are shared by a facet in ${\cal A}_+$ and by a facet not in ${\cal A}_+$ but for which $\langle \nu,\omega \rangle\ge 0$.
[**2.**]{} Construct the set ${\cal F}\subset {\cal E}_+$ of the edges shared by a facet of ${\cal A}_+$ and a facet for which $\langle \nu,\omega \rangle<0$.
[**3.**]{} Construct the connected and ordered line sequences (lists of vertices) $\Sigma_{0i}$ of the adjacent edges of ${\cal F}_0$. The edges are defined by two vertices, and within $\Sigma_{0i}$ one vertex shares two edges.
[**4.**]{} Construct the connected sequences $\Sigma_i$ from ${\cal F}$ as in [**3**]{}.
[**5.**]{} The projections of the line sequences ${\cal P}(\omega,\Sigma_{0i})$ cannot intersect each other, but ${\cal P}(\omega,\Sigma_i)$ can intersect each other and ${\cal P}(\omega,\Sigma_{0i})$ (intersection of projections can only occur when the surface folds away from sight, i.e., the line corresponds to a facet for which $\langle \nu,\omega \rangle<0$). For any intersecting projected sequences, find the intersection points $p_{ij}$ on the projection plane with the intersection test above.
[**6.**]{} Define the visible projections $\tilde\Sigma_{0i}$ and $\tilde\Sigma_i$ as the projected sequences ${\cal P}(\omega,\Sigma_{0i})$ and ${\cal P}(\omega,\Sigma_i)$ that may have a $p_{ij}$ as an end point.
[**7.**]{} Connect all $\tilde\Sigma_{0i}$ and $\tilde\Sigma_i$ that can form closed circuits (by systematically comparing the endpoints of the sequences). The circuit enclosing all the others (e.g., those due to shadows) is the approximation of the outer profile contour $\p\cal O$.
If there are more than one generalized profile contours, the identification of the circuits should be arranged suitably to enable the comparison between the model and the data. For example, one shadow region inside $\p\cal O$ and a smaller $\p{\cal O}_2$ outside $\p\cal O$ due to a separate closed surface can be identified directly, and all circuits can be used in determining the best model.
The position of a point in $\p\cal O$ can be parametrized by using the path length along $\p\cal O$. The $\chi^2_\p$ is now given by (assuming one contour per profile) \^2\_=\_[ij]{} \_[o]{}(c\_[ij]{}) -(\_[m]{}(c\_[i0]{}+c\_[ij]{})-\_[i0]{})\^2 +\_i (S\_i-C\_i)\^2,\[aochisq2\] where o an m stand for observed and modelled, $0\le c\le 1$ is the normalized path length along the measured and modelled contours $\p{\cal M}_i$, $\p{\cal O}_i$, $\varkappa_{i0}$ is the profile offset for each profile $i$, $c_{i0}$ is the offset parameter for the path’s starting point, $\lambda$ is a suitable weight factor, and S\_i=\_[\_i]{} ds,C\_i=\_[\_i]{} ds. Thus, $c=s/S_i$ or $c=s/C_i$, where $s$ is the usual path length.
The contour fit can also be modelled by considering the distances of observed points from the model contour $\p{\cal O}$. Now we define \^2\_=\_[ij]{} \_s{\_i(s)- \_[ij]{}\^2},\[aochisq3\] where $\varkappa_{ij}$ are the data points, and we label the points on $\p{\cal O}_i$ by $s$, and assume the translation due to $\varkappa_{i0}$ to be included in $\p{\cal O}_i(s)$; here it suffices to consider points in $\p\cal O$ on whose normal lines $\varkappa_{ij}$ lies. When $\p\cal O$ is a set of line segments, the shortest distance required in (\[aochisq3\]) (let us denote it by $\delta_{\rm min}$) is defined by:
[**1.**]{} Let $p'_j\in{{\mathbb R}}^2$ be the projection of $\varkappa$ on the line coinciding with the $j$th line segment (corresponding to $\tan\alpha=(\xi_a-\xi_b)/(\eta_a-\eta_b)$ and $(\xi_0,\eta_0)\rightarrow(x,y)$ in the intersection test above): p’\_[(1)]{}=,p’\_[(2)]{}=. If the projection is inside the segment, let $d'_j$ be the distance between $p'_j$ and $\varkappa$.
[**2.**]{} Let $d_k$ be the distance of $\varkappa$ from the $k$th end point of the line segments of $\p\cal O$.
[**3.**]{} $\delta_{\rm min}$ is the smallest one of all the distances $d'_j$ and $d_k$.
In addition to solving for the shape, we usually need to determine the target’s spin state as well in order to have correct projection directions [@kaas01]. In most cases, the target revolves around a constant pole direction $(\beta,\lambda)\in S^2$ at a constant rotation speed. The profile plane coordinates $(\xi,\eta)$ are the $x_2'$- and $x_3'$-components of x’=[R]{}x,\[roteq\] where =[R]{}\_y(-)[R]{}\_z (-)[R]{}\_y(-) [R]{}\_z(-\_0-(t-t\_0)),\[rot\] where $t$ is the time, $\Omega$ is the rotation speed ($2\pi/P$ for a constant rotation period $P$), $\phi_0$ and the epoch $t_0$ are some initial values, and $(\vartheta,\psi)\in S^2$ is the direction from the target to the observer. We determine $(\beta,\lambda)$ and $\Omega$ when solving the inverse problem. It is easy to accommodate other spin models such as precession [@prec] or nonconstant rotation speed [@yorp] in this formalism.
Regularization
--------------
The parameters $P$ describing the target usually have to be (moderately) regularized to prevent unrealistic solutions. One aspect is the smoothness of the body; the larger the target is, the less irregular it is expected to be. For some parts of the surface this is explicitly enforced by the profile data, so the regularization mostly pertains to the parts covered only by lightcurves that contain little information on nonconvex features. In those regions, undulation of the surface should be suppressed (the optimal choice of the suppression weight is discussed in section 4).
For starlike bodies $\cal B$, a simple (computationally $\chi^2$-like) measure of global regularity is g\_S=\_[B]{} \[r-r \]\^2d, where $r$ is the radius of the model at the point corresponding to the surface element $d\sigma$; for polytopes, we can simply use $g_S=\sum_i (r_i-\langle r \rangle)^2$. For such bodies, $g_S$ is typically quite efficient when the radius is given by a truncated Laplace series (itself a smoothing agent; see section 5 and [@kaast]) and the regularization weight is low. This is usually the case here as the profile contours already prevent runaway solutions, so $g_S$ is only needed to polish up the resolution level of shape detail. For higher weights or models with independent (uncorrelated) surface points, $g_S$ is not suitable as it emphasizes global roundedness more than local smoothness.
A measure concentrating on local smoothness (and more suitable for more complex cases) can be constructed by considering the negative values of the curvature function. For polytopes, a practical discrete version of this is computed by measuring how efficiently the facets not in the convex hull of the polytope can be blocked (from viewing or illumination) by their adjacent facets [@kaast]. Taking into account the size and relative tilt angle of the possible blocker facets adjacent to the facet $i$, we can define, e.g., the following measure $\cal C$ by summing over the polytope and weighting suitably: = \_[ij]{} A\_[ij]{}(1-\_i,\_[ij]{}), where $A_i$ denotes the area of the facet $i$, and $A_{ij}$ the areas of those facets around it that are tilted above its plane [@kaast] (for $i$ in the convex hull, $\sum_j A_{ij}=0$ by definition). In regularization, we minimize $\cal C$ (for convex bodies ${\cal C}\equiv 0$).
A further smoothing constraint, to be used for non-starlike contours $\p\cal O$ if the observations do not cover the profile densely, is given by augmenting (\[aochisq3\]) by \_i\_[\_i]{} \_[{\_[ij]{}}]{}{\_i(s)- \^2} ds, which suppresses irregularity on surface parts not projected near the observed profile points.
A physical constraint for most asteroids is that they are principal-axis rotators: their maximum moment of inertia is aligned with the rotation axis due to energy dissipation caused by the nonzero elasticity of the material of the body [@pravec]. The regularization is defined by the symmetric inertia tensor [@gold] =(
[rrr]{} P\_[22]{}+P\_[33]{}&-P\_[12]{}&-P\_[13]{}\
-P\_[12]{}&P\_[11]{}+P\_[33]{}&-P\_[23]{}\
-P\_[13]{}&-P\_[23]{}&P\_[11]{}+P\_[22]{}
), where the inertia products $P_{ij}$ are P\_[ij]{}=\_[B]{} (x)x\_ix\_jd\^3x, and here we choose constant density $\rho(x)=1$. We want to minimize the angle $\tau$ between the $z$-axis of the model and the eigenvector $I\in{{\mathbb R}}^3$ (normalized $\langle I,I\rangle=1$) corresponding to the largest eigenvalue of the inertia matrix $\sf I$ of the model shape $\cal B$, so we can choose, for example: g\_I=(1-\^2)\^2=\[1-I\_3([B]{})\^2\]\^2,\[inertreg\] where the square form $I_3^2$ is useful for weighting purposes and for removing the sign ambiguity in $I_3$. A fast way of evaluating $I_3$ in (\[inertreg\]) for any polyhedron is described in [@dobro]. Again, profile data constrain the result so strongly that usually the weight for $g_I$ is very low and sometimes can be set to zero to obtain, say, $\tau<4^\circ$. Enforcing a $\tau$ much lower than this is seldom meaningful due to shape resolution level and inhomogeneities in the density.
Optimal combination of data modes: maximum compatibility estimate
=================================================================
From the statistical viewpoint, when we have two or more data modes, we consider their simultaneous probability distribution of model parameters and observations (augmented by prior or regularization distributions) in determining the posteriori distribution of the model and the corresponding estimates. The essential problem in this combining is inevitably the weighting of distributions. While the data modes share a common set of parameters describing the underlying model to be solved for, the models and modalities of observations may be completely different, and we seldom know a priori exactly how to compare and weigh their significance.
Let us choose as goodness-of-fit measures (from which probability distributions can be constructed) the $\chi^2$-functions of $n$ data modes. Our task is to construct a joint $\chi_{\rm tot}$ with well-defined weighting for each data mode: \_[tot]{}\^2(P,D)=\_1\^2(P,D\_1)+\_[i=2]{}\^n \_[i-1]{} \_i\^2(P,D\_i)D={D\_i,i=1,…,n} (to which regularization functions $g(P)$ can be added), where $D_i$ denotes the data from the source $i$, and $P\in{{\mathbb R}}^p$ is the set of model parameter values. We assume the $\chi^2_i$-space to be nondegenerate, i.e., $$\arg\min \chi^2_i(P) \ne \arg\min \chi^2_j(P),\quad i\ne j$$
In two dimensions, denote x()&:=&\_1\^2\_[tot]{}\^2;,\
y()&:=&\_2\^2\_[tot]{}\^2;. The curve ():=\[x(),y()\] resembles the well-known “L-curve” related to, e.g., Tikhonov regularization [@belge; @engl; @hanke]. However, here we make no assumptions on the shape of $\cal S$. The curve $\cal S$ is a part of the boundary $\p\cal R$ of the region ${\cal R}\in{{\mathbb R}}^2$ formed by the mapping $\chi: {{\mathbb R}}^p\rightarrow{{\mathbb R}}^2$ from the parameter space ${{\mathbb P}}$ into $\chi_i^2$-space: $$\chi=\lbrace{{\mathbb P}}\rightarrow
(\log\chi_1^2,\log\chi_2^2)\rbrace,\quad {\cal R}=\chi({\cal P})$$ where the set ${\cal P}$ includes all the possible values of model parameters (assuming that $\chi$ is continuous and well-behaved such that a connected $\cal R$ and $\p\cal R$ exist). If the possible values of $\chi^2_i$ are not bounded, the remaining part $\p\cal R\setminus\cal S$ stretches droplet-like towards $(\infty,\infty)$. The parameter $\lambda$ describes the position on the interesting part ${\cal S}\subset\p\cal R$, and it is up to us to define a criterion for choosing the optimal value of $\lambda$.
The logarithm ensures that the shape of ${\cal S}(\lambda)$ is invariant under unit or scale transforms in the $\chi_i^2$ as they merely translate ${\cal S}$ in the $(\log\chi_1^2,\log\chi_2^2)$-plane. It also provides a meaningful metric for the $\log\chi_i^2$-space: distances depict the relative difference in $\chi^2$-sense, removing the problem of comparing the absolute values of quite different types of $\chi_i^2$. The endpoints of ${\cal S}(\lambda)$ are at $\lambda=0$ and $\lambda=\infty$, i.e., at the values of $\chi_i^2$ that result from using only one of the data modes in inversion. We can translate the origin of the $(\log\chi_1^2,\log\chi_2^2)$-plane to a more natural position by choosing the new coordinate axes to pass through these endpoints. Denote x\_0&=&x()\_[=0]{}=\_1\^2\
y\_0&=&y()\_=\_2\^2. Then the “ideal point” $(\hat x_0,\hat y_0)$ is the new origin in the $(\log x,\log y)$-plane. A natural choice for an optimal location on $\cal S$ is the point closest to $(\hat x_0,\hat y_0)$, i.e., the parameter values $P_0\in{{\mathbb P}}$ such that P\_0=(\[\^2\_1(P)-x\_0\]\^2+\[\^2\_2(P)- y\_0\]\^2), so we have, with $\lambda$ as argument, \_0=(\[x()-x\_0\]\^2+\[y()- y\_0\]\^2).\[lambda0\] In this approach, neither the numbers of data points in each $\chi^2_i$ nor the noise levels as such affect the solution for the optimal $P_0$ as their scaling effects cancel out in each quadratic term. $P_0$ is thus a pure compatibility estimate describing the best model compromise explaining the datasets of different modes simultaneously.
We call the point $P_0$ the [*maximum compatibility estimate*]{} (MCE), and $\lambda_0$ the [*maximum compatibility weight*]{} (MCW). This corresponds to the maximum likelihood estimate in the case of one data mode, or to the maximum a posteriori estimate as well since we can include regularization functions here. If regularizing is used, the weights for the functions are either determined in a similar manner (see below), or they can be fixed and the regularization terms are absorbed in $\chi_1^2$ (otherwise ${\cal S}\subset\p\cal R$ does not hold).
Another choice, frequently used in the L-curve approach, is to find the $\lambda$ at which $\cal S$ attains its maximum curvature [@hanke; @engl], but evaluating this point is less robust than finding $\lambda_0$, and (\[lambda0\]) is a more natural prescription, requiring no assumptions on the shape of $\cal S$. We make two implicit assumptions here:
1. The solutions $P_{\p\cal R}$ corresponding to points on $\p\cal R$ should be continuous (and one-to-one) in ${{\mathbb P}}$-space along $\p\cal R$ at least in the vicinity of the solution corresponding to $\lambda_0$. If this is not true (in practice, if $P_\lambda=\arg\min\chi^2_{\rm tot}(P)$ makes large jumps in ${{\mathbb P}}$ for various $\lambda$ around $\lambda_0$), one should be cautious about the uniqueness and stability of the chosen solution $P_0$, and restrict the regions of ${{\mathbb P}}$ included in the analysis.
2. The optimal point $\lambda_0$ on $\cal S$ should be feasible: if we have upper limits $\epsilon_i$ to acceptable $\chi^2_i$, the feasible region $\cal F$ is the rectangle $\bigcap_i\lbrace\log\chi^2_i\le\log\epsilon_i\rbrace$. If $[\log\chi_1^2(P_0),\log\chi_2^2(P_0)]\notin
\cal F$ and ${\cal F}\cap{\cal R}\ne
\emptyset$, we choose the point on the portion ${\cal S}\subset\cal R$ closest to the one corresponding to $\lambda_0$ (i.e., $\log\chi^2_i=\log\epsilon_i$ for one $i$). If ${\cal F}\cap{\cal R}=\emptyset$, the data modes do not allow a compatible joint model, so either the model is incorrect for one or both data modes, or one or both $\epsilon_i$ have been estimated too low (e.g., systematic errors have not been taken into account). Note that model insufficiency should be taken into account in the estimation of $\epsilon_i$.
Note that, in the interpretation ${\cal R}=\chi({\cal P})$, $\lambda$, $\chi_{\rm tot}^2$ and $\p\cal R$ are all in fact superfluous quantities, and we can locate the point estimate MCE $P_0$ entirely without them with standard optimization procedures (and with no extra computational cost). However, it is useful (though computationally somewhat noisier) to approximate $\cal S$ via the minimization of $\chi_{\rm tot}^2$ with sample values of $\lambda$ (see Fig. 1), as in addition to obtaining the MCW $\lambda_0$ (and hence MCE as well) we can plot $\cal S$ to examine the mutual behaviour of the complementary data sources (including the position of the feasibility region $\cal F$ w.r.t. $\cal S$). The solution for $\lambda_0$ is also needed for constructing distributions based on $\chi^2_{\rm tot}$. Another possibility to examine $\cal R$ and $\p\cal R$ is direct adaptive Monte Carlo sampling, but this is computationally slow.
This approach straightforwardly generalizes to $n$ $\chi^2$-functions and $n-1$ parameters $\lambda_i$ describing the position on the $n-1$-dimensional boundary surface $\p\cal R$ of an $n$-dimensional domain $\cal R$: the MCE is P\_0=\_[i=1]{}\^n\^2, \^2\_[i0]{}:=\^2\_i(P),\[p0\] and the MCW is [[R]{}]{}\^[n-1]{}:\_0=\_[i=1]{}\^n\^2, \_[i,[tot]{}]{}\^2():= {\^2\_i\^2\_[tot]{};}.\[l0\]
Another scale invariant version of MCE can be constructed by plotting $\chi^2_i$ in units of $\chi^2_i/\chi^2_{i0}$ and shifting the new origin to $\chi^2_i/\chi^2_{i0}=1$: P\_0=\_[i=1]{}\^n\^2, \_0=\_[i=1]{}\^n\^2. This, however, is exactly the first-order approximation of (\[p0\]) and (\[l0\]) in $\delta\ll 1$ when $\chi^2_i/\chi^2_{i0}=1+\delta$, giving virtually the same result as (\[p0\]) and (\[l0\]) as usually $\chi^2_i(P_0)/\chi^2_{i0}-1\ll 1$ in the region around $\chi^2_i(P_0)$, and any larger ratios of $\chi^2_i/\chi^2_{i0}$ are not eligible for the optimal solution (see Fig. 1).
Instead of the $L_2$-norm $\chi^2$ (and the corresponding $\chi^2$-distribution), we can choose some other goodness-of-fit measure $\varepsilon(P,D)\ge 0$ (and distribution) for the individual data modes. For a linear combination of these, we have $$\varepsilon_{\rm tot}(P,D)=\varepsilon_1(P,D_1)+\sum_{i=2}^n
\lambda_{i-1}\varepsilon_i(P,D_i).$$ In lightcurve measurements, for example, the effect of systematic errors in both model and data dominates over random noise when the noise level is not high [@iau], so it is not mandatory to use $\chi^2$ as a standard measure of fit.
![$\cal S$ curve plotted for 2 Pallas with various weights $\lambda$ (LC for lightcurves, AO for adaptive optics profiles).[]{data-label="scurve"}](weightPallas.eps){width="11cm"}
It is possible to use this approach for general regularizing functions $g(P)$ as well (change $\chi_i^2\rightarrow g(P)$ for some $i$), but in such cases the shape of $\cal S$ must be taken into account. If it is possible to have a solution $g(P')=0$ for a regularizing function $g$ (or an almost vanishing $g(P')$ such that $\log g(P')\rightarrow -\infty$), the above scheme automatically returns $P'$ and ignores the actual data altogether. Thus one should, e.g., set a lower practical limit to $g(P)$ by looking at the shape of $S$, and choose the $\lambda_0$ within the restricted part of $S$. Likewise, one can use the above scheme for assigning noise-level-independent weights to subsets of the same data mode (rather than have the standard $\chi^2$ evaluated from all data points), but obviously the subsets cannot be chosen arbitrarily if the result is to make sense. For example, one can estimate the optimal weight for one lightcurve that appears to reveal features not contained in other lightcurves and thus judge its real significance. Even one noisy lightcurve with a few points, taken at a special observing geometry, may well contain significant information that needs to be weighed more against less noisy but more ordinary lightcurves.
Numerical implementation
========================
As examples of the optimal combining of lightcurves and AO profiles, we show representative results for the asteroids 2 Pallas and 41 Daphne. Full detailed descriptions of the observations and models of these targets are presented in [@carry2] and Carry et al. (in preparation). An example of an even more irregular shape constructed with our procedure is the model of the primary body of the binary asteroid 121 Hermione [@descamps]. The lightcurve $\chi^2_L$ was computed as in [@kaast; @kaas01] and profile $\chi^2_\p$ as in the starlike case of section 3, and the minimization of $\chi^2_{\rm tot}$ was performed as in [@kaast; @kaas01]. The observed profiles are projections of the target on the plane-of-sky $S^2$ converted to pixels on the instrument plane, while the model is constructed in absolute (km) size, so the model/profile scale conversion is given by the AO instrument’s angular resolution and the distance between the target and the observer. The profile contour extraction procedure with wavelets (as an average of several AO images obtained in a short time interval) is described in [@carry1; @carry2].
In general, the resolution of the model must be somewhat lower than the apparent resolution of the AO images as the sparse profile samples will produce artificial features elsewhere in the model if a near-perfect profile fit is enforced (even if the observed profile details were exactly right). The inverse problem has thus some ill-posedness at local scales starting near the profile resolution level, but the ill-posedness at more global scales, inherent to lightcurve data [@kaas01; @genproj; @iau], is removed with AO profiles. The weight factor $\lambda$ mostly takes care of this, and fine-tuning is obtained with $\lambda_S$ for the smoothness constraint $g_S$. For the examples here, the weight of the inertia regularization function $g_I$ was low as there were several profiles available; virtually the same result was achieved with $\lambda_I=0$. The weights $\lambda$ and $\lambda_S$ were determined with the scheme of section 4; the examined interval of $\lambda_S$ was restricted to realistic values corresponding to the resolution level of the AO images.
Fig. 1 depicts a typical evaluation of the curve $\cal S$ at various choices of $\lambda$; or rather, this plot portrays the cross-section of the 2-surface $\p\cal R$ in ${{\mathbb R}}^3$ with $\lambda_S$ fixed at its final optimal value. The values for $\chi_i^2$ are normalized to be the rms deviations of model fits $d_i=\sqrt{\chi_i^2/N_i}$, as in logarithmic scale this corresponds only to a shift of origin and a uniform linear change of plot scaling. The plotted points outline the curve ${\cal S}(\lambda)$ that is rather an oblique line than an L-shape, and the ideal point region, i.e., the point closest to the lower left-hand corner, can directly be found. The endpoints $\lambda=0$ and $\lambda=\infty$ stop at saturation regions rather than continue to large distances in the $\log\chi^2$-space. As can be seen from Fig. 1, computational noise in the estimated points at $\lambda=0$ and $\lambda=\infty$, corresponding to a small change of the position of the new origin w.r.t. $\cal S$, does not affect the estimated location of the optimal point on $\cal S$ significantly.
![Sample observed (solid lines) vs. modelled (dashed lines) AO contours for 2 Pallas. Coordinates are in pixel units.[]{data-label="aopallas"}](c3.eps "fig:"){width="5.8cm"}![Sample observed (solid lines) vs. modelled (dashed lines) AO contours for 2 Pallas. Coordinates are in pixel units.[]{data-label="aopallas"}](c6.eps "fig:"){width="5.8cm"}![Sample observed (solid lines) vs. modelled (dashed lines) AO contours for 2 Pallas. Coordinates are in pixel units.[]{data-label="aopallas"}](c8.eps "fig:"){width="5.8cm"}
Sample observed vs. modelled profiles for 2 Pallas and 41 Daphne are shown in Figs. 2 and 3. The starlike surface model was described by the exponential Laplace (spherical harmonics) series for the surface radius $r$ [@kaast] r(,)=, (,)S\^2, truncated at suitable $l,m$, with $c_{lm}$ as the shape parameters to be solved for. Other model parameters are the profile offset $(\xi_0,\eta_0)$ for each image and the spin parameters. For asteroid 2 Pallas (a rather spherical body with size class 500 km), the Laplace series was truncated at maximal $l=6,m=6$, while for the more irregular 41 Daphne (size class 200 km) the truncation point $l=8,m=6$ was more appropriate. The early truncated Laplace series and the choice of the truncation point are implicit regularization measures as such. We leave the discussion of the choice of model discretization level elsewhere (cf. [@kaipio]) as here its effect on the data mode weighting was negligible (within a feasible set of choices), and the resolution level of AO images (as well as keeping $\lambda_S$ low and avoiding artificial surface features) essentially determined the choice in practice after some sampling. For AO data, the choice of the Laplace series as a model is practical, while for, e.g., detailed space probe data a mesh of independent surface points is more accurate and computationally feasible.
![Sample observed (solid lines) vs. modelled (dashed lines) AO contours for 41 Daphne. Coordinates are in pixel units.[]{data-label="aodaphne"}](d5.eps "fig:"){width="5.8cm"}![Sample observed (solid lines) vs. modelled (dashed lines) AO contours for 41 Daphne. Coordinates are in pixel units.[]{data-label="aodaphne"}](d11.eps "fig:"){width="5.8cm"}![Sample observed (solid lines) vs. modelled (dashed lines) AO contours for 41 Daphne. Coordinates are in pixel units.[]{data-label="aodaphne"}](d23.eps "fig:"){width="5.8cm"}
Once the weight factors $\lambda$ and $\lambda_S$ are determined, the result is usually stable and restricted to one region in the parameter space ${{\mathbb P}}$: probing feasible solutions $P$ corresponding to $\chi^2_{\rm tot}(P)$ slightly lower than $\chi^2_{\rm tot}(P_0)$ produces essentially the same results. Due to restricted orbital geometries, lightcurve data alone often imply two almost equally possible pole directions with mirror-like shape solutions [@genproj; @iau]; even one AO (or other) image usually resolves this typical ambiguity [@keck]. The result is also typically stable w.r.t. weights in the vicinity of MCW. The obtained MCE appears to be well justified when one samples the solutions along $\cal S$: it provides a very good match to profile details without straying far from the observed lightcurves, and does not predict too prominent features on the parts of the surface not projected onto the profile contours.
Conclusions and discussion
==========================
We have examined the classes of shapes reconstructable by the (generalized) profiles of objects in ${{\mathbb R}}^3$, and presented a method for using lightcurves and the observed contours of generalized profiles simultaneously to produce shape (and spin) models with more details (and a lower degree of ill-posedness) than in the pure lightcurve mode. We have also shown that there is a well-justified criterion and an efficient method for determining the optimal weighting of data modes. Applied to real data, the method works very well, and we can use simple regularization functions. In addition to adaptive optics observations, asteroid profiles can also be obtained from other sources such as interferometry, space telescopes, and stellar occultations (partial profiles).
The use of profiles is practical as it removes two sources of systematic errors inherent to using full images (brightness distributions $\cal I$ on the image plane): the errors in $\cal I$ from AO deconvolution and the model $\cal I$ errors due to the insufficently modellable light-scattering properties of the surface of the target body. On the other hand, profile determination requires the data to be sharp enough, not with fuzzy images. If the images are fuzzy, we usually have to resort to using some brightness and blurring model for fitting full images, even though the result will be less certain.
The concept of the maximum compatibility estimate is directly applicable to any inverse problems with complementary data modes. The invariance properties of the MCE make it more generally usable than heuristic strategies for choosing the weights, especially when they use assumptions on the shape of $\p\cal R$ or other case-specific characteristics.
Acknowledgements {#acknowledgements .unnumbered}
----------------
It is a pleasure to thank Benoit Carry and Josef Ďurech for discussions and comments. The sample adaptive optics data used in figures here are courtesy of B. Carry, A. Conrad, J. Drummond, C. Dumas, S. Erard, and W. Merline. This work was supported by the Academy of Finland (project “New mathematical methods in planetary and galactic research”).
[99]{}
M. Belge, M. Kilmer, and E. Miller, [*Efficient determination of multiple regularization parameters in a generalized L-curve framework*]{}, Inverse Problems, [**18**]{} (2002), 1161-1183.
B. Carry, C. Dumas, M. Fulchignoni, W. Merline, J. Berthier, D. Hestroffer, T. Fusco, and P. Tamblyn, [*Near-infrared mapping and physical properties of the dwarf-planet Ceres*]{}, Astron. Astrophys., [**478**]{} (2008), 235-244.
B. Carry, C. Dumas, M. Kaasalainen, and 9 colleagues, [*Physical properties of 2 Pallas*]{}, Icarus, (2009) in press.
P. Descamps and 22 colleagues, [*New insights on the binary asteroid 121 Hermione*]{}, Icarus, [**203**]{} (2009), 88-101.
A. Dobrovolskis, [*Inertia of any polyhedron*]{}, Icarus, [**124**]{} (1996), 698-704.
J. Ďurech and M. Kaasalainen. [*Photometric signatures of highly nonconvex and binary asteroids*]{}, Astron. Astrophys., [**404**]{} (2003), 709-714.
H. Engl and W. Grever, [*Using the L-curve for determining optimal regularization parameters*]{}, Numer. Math., [**69**]{} (1994), 25-31.
H. Goldstein, “Classical mechanics” (second edition), Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1980.
M. Hanke, [*Limitations of the L-curve method in ill-posed problems*]{}, BIT, [**36**]{} (1996), 287-301.
M. Kaasalainen, L. Lamberg, K. Lumme, and E. Bowell, [*Interpretation of lightcurves of atmosphereless bodies. I. General theory and new inversion schemes*]{}, Astron. Astrophys., [**259**]{} (1992), 318-332.
M. Kaasalainen and J. Torppa, [*Optimization methods for asteroid lightcurve inversion. I. Shape determination*]{}, Icarus, [**153**]{} (2001), 24-36.
M. Kaasalainen, J. Torppa, and K. Muinonen, [*Optimization methods for asteroid lightcurve inversion. II. The complete inverse problem*]{}, Icarus, [**153**]{} (2001), 37-51.
M. Kaasalainen, [*Interpretation of lightcurves of precessing asteroids*]{}, Astron. Astrophys., [**376**]{} (2001), 302-309.
M. Kaasalainen and L. Lamberg, [*Inverse problems of generalized projection operators*]{}, Inverse Problems [**22**]{} (2006), 749-769.
M. Kaasalainen and J. Ďurech, [*Inverse problems of NEO photometry: Imaging the NEO population*]{}, in “Proceedings of IAU: Symposium 236”, [**2**]{}, Milani, Valsecchi, and Vokrouhlicky, eds., Cambridge (2007), 151-166.
M. Kaasalainen, J. Ďurech, B. Warner, Y. Krugly, and N. Gaftonyuk, [*Acceleration of the rotation of asteroid 1862 Apollo by radiation torques*]{}, Nature, [**446**]{} (2007), 420-422.
J. Kaipio and E. Somersalo, “Statistical and computational inverse problems”, Springer, New York 2005.
D. Levin, [*The approximation power of moving least squares*]{}, Math. Comp., [**67**]{} (1998), 1517-1531.
F. Marchis, M. Kaasalainen, E. Hom, J. Berthier, J. Enriquez, D. Hestroffer, D. Le Mignant, and I. de Pater, [*Shape, size and multiplicity of main-belt asteroids. I. Keck adaptive optics survey*]{}, Icarus, [**185**]{} (2006), 39-63.
P. Pravec, A. Harris, and T. Michalowski. [*Asteroid rotations*]{}, in “Asteroids III”, Bottke, Cellino, Paolicchi, and Binzel, eds., U. Arizona Press, Tucson (2002), 113-122.
S. Savarese, M. Andretto, H. Rushmeier, F. Bernardini, and P. Perona, [*3D Reconstruction by Shadow Carving: Theory and Practical Evaluation*]{}, International Journal of Computer Vision, [**71**]{} (2007), 305-336.
First.Lastname \[at\] tut.fi
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'Red blood cells (RBC) are known to form aggregates in the form of rouleaux due to the presence of plasma proteins under physiological conditions. The formation of rouleaux can also be induced *in vitro* by the addition of macromolecules to the RBC suspension. Current data on the adhesion strength between red blood cells in their natural discocyte shapes mostly originate from indirect measurements such as flow chamber experiments, but data is lacking at the single cell level. Here, we present measurements on the dextran-induced aggregation of red blood cells using atomic force microscopy-based single cell force spectroscopy (SCFS). The effects of dextran concentration and molecular weight on the interaction energy of adhering RBCs were determined. The results are in excellent agreement with a model based on the depletion effect and previous experimental studies.'
author:
- 'P. Steffen$^{1}$,C. Verdier$^{2}$, C. Wagner$^{1}$'
title: Quantification of Depletion Induced Adhesion of Red Blood Cells
---
Non-pathological aggregation of RBCs or “rouleaux formation” (Fig.\[Introduction\]a) *in vivo* is frequently observed and caused by the fibrinogen in plasma [@Fahraeus1929]. These aggregates are reversibly formed and can be dispersed by moderate shear rates. Thus, the shear thinning viscosity of blood is determined to a large extent by the formation and breaking of these aggregates. Irreversible red blood cell aggregation could be a microcirculatory risk factor and indicative of disease because irreversible aggregates can be observed in diseases such as malaria, multiple myeloma, inflammation [@Rampling2004] or in pathological thrombus formation [@Steffen2011]. Reversible rouleaux formation can also be induced by resuspending the RBCs in physiological solutions containing neutral macromolecules such as dextran (DEX) [@Pribush2007]. The fibrinogen mediated aggregation of RBCs increases consistently with increasing fibrinogen concentration [@Marton2001], whereas the dextran-mediated aggregation of RBCs reaches a maximum at a certain dextran concentration. The strength of the aggregation depends not only on the dextran concentration, but also on the molecular weight of the dextran (i.e., the radius of gyration of the dextran) [@Brooks1988; @Chien1987]. Previously, two different models have been developped to explain the aggregation of RBCs in polymer solutions: the Cross-Bridging model and the Depletion model. The Bridging model has been favored for a long time and has been proposed for plasma protein and neutral dextran macromolecule-induced RBC aggregation [@Brooks1973]. In this model, it is assumed that fibrinogen or dextran molecules non-specifically adsorb onto the cell membrane and form a “bridge” to the adjacent cell. However, over the most recent decade, more and more evidence has been observed in favor of the depletion model [@Neu2002; @Neu2006; @Meiselmann2009; @Baeumler1996; @Armstrong1999]. A first explanation of depletion forces was given by Asakura and Oosawa [@Asakura1958], who discovered that the presence of small spheres (i.e., macromolecules) can induce effective forces between two larger particles if the distance between them is small enough. The origin of these forces is purely entropic. If the distance between the two large particles decreases to less than the size of the surrounding macromolecules, these macromolecules are expelled from the region between the particles. Consistently, the concentration of macromolecules becomes depleted in this region compared to that of the bulk, and an effective osmotic pressure causing an attraction between the large particles occurs. Neu et al. [@Neu2002] applied this concept of depletion-induced adhesion to red blood cells and developped a theoretical description of the interaction energy between two red blood cells in terms of the molecular weight and concentration of the dextran used. These results were compared with former measurements reported by Buxbaum et al. [@Buxbaum1982] based on the micropipette aspiration technique. Neu et al. were able to adapt their model parameters consistently to the experimental data of Buxbaum et al., but the number of data points remained limited. In the present study, we used the technique of single cell force spectroscopy (SCFS) (Fig.\[Introduction\]b) to measure the interaction energies between human red blood cells as functions of the molecular weight and concentration of dextran at the single cellular level and compared them to the predicted values of Neu et al.[@Neu2002]. Similar to them we used dextran70 (DEX70 with a molecular weight of $70 \kilo\dalton$) and dextran150 (DEX150 with a molecular weight of $150 \kilo\dalton$) from Sigma-Aldrich. In SCFS a single RBC is attached to a cantilever, while another cell is attached to the surface of the petri dish. Both cells are now brought into close contact and during the withdrawing of the cantilever the adhesion force between both cells is measured via the deflection of the cantilever (see Fig.\[Introduction\]b). An atomic force microscope (AFM) (Nanowizard 2, equipped with the CellHesion Module with an increased pulling range of $100 \micro\meter$, JPK Instruments, Germany) was used to conduct single cell force spectroscopy measurements [@Friedrichs2010]. The spring constant of the cantilever was determined using the common thermal noise method (the cantilevers used were MLCT-O cantilevers with spring constants on the order of $0.01 \newton/\meter$, Bruker). Fresh blood from healthy donors was taken using a finger prick. The blood was obtained within one day of the experiment. The cells were washed three times by centrifugation ($2000 \gram, 3 \minute$) in a phosphate-buffered solution of physiological ionic strength. In the course of the experiment, a single RBC was attached to an AFM cantilever by appropriate functionalization. Cell Tak$^{TM}$ (BD Science) was used to bind a cell to the cantilever. A protocol was used, in which the cantilever was incubated in a Cell Tak$^{TM}$ drop. After $2\minute$, the Cell Tak$^{TM}$ solution was carefully removed; this was followed by a $3 \minute$ waiting period to allow the acetic acid from the Cell-Tak$^{TM}$ to evaporate from the cantilever. Rinsing the cantilever with ethanol and PBS (Phosphate-Buffered Saline, $137\milli M/\litre\;\; NaCl$, $2.7\milli M/\litre\;\; KCl$, $10\milli M/\litre\;\; Na_2HPO_42H_2O$, $2\milli M/\litre\;\; KH_2PO_4$, $pH=7.4$) completed the functionalization protocol. To attach a RBC to the cantilever, the latter was lowered manually until a preset cantilever deflection (i.e. force setpoint $F_{set}$) was reached, indicating contact between the cantilever and the cell. The cantilever was withdrawn continuously at low speed until the cell was no longer in contact with the surface. After the cell had been attached to the cantilever, the cell was placed on top of another cell that lay on the bottom of the petri dish. Functionalization of the plastic petri dish (PS, Polystyrol), to immobilize the bottom cell, was not necessary because RBCs adhered to the surface without any further treatment. While withdrawing (or retracting) the cantilever the adhesion force and adhesion energy were measured. The retraction curve is typically characterized by the maximum force required to separate the cells from each other and adhesion energy is calculated by computing the area under the retraction curve of the force distance curve. The interaction energies (or, more precisely, the interaction energy densities of two RBCs) are calculated by dividing the measured adhesion energies by the contact areas of the adhering cells using a value of $50.24 \micro\meter^2$ derived from the mean radius of RBCs. The present study is exclusively concerned with adhesion that is caused by the presence of dextran molecules in the solution. Hence, any further source of adhesion (e.g., adhesion of the lower RBC to the Cell-Tak coated surface of the cantilever, see Fig.\[BSA\]a) had to be excluded. For larger and stiffer cells, compared to RBCs, such undesired adhesion events are rarely observed, but for RBCs that have a height of just $2 \micro\meter$ this is an experimental difficulty; even with optimum (concentric) alignment, such binding to the surface was often observed in our first experiments. An example of those undesired adhesion events is shown in Fig.\[BSA\]a. The measured adhesion forces were much higher than any reasonable estimate for dextran-induced adhesion. To overcome this problem, $0.1 \gram/\deci\litre$ BSA (Bovine Serum Albumin) was added to the solution after attaching the RBC to the cantilever. BSA could potentially induce an additional depletion interaction; however because the radius of gyration of BSA is only $3 \nano\meter$ [@Santos2003] and the concentration is fairly small, the additional depletion interaction due to the presence of BSA can be neglected. The effects of BSA treatment on RBCs (e.g., on cell geometry or mechanical properties) have been studied intensively [@Khairy2008; @Jay1975; @Williams1973]. However, any effect of the BSA treatment on the measured interaction energy can be neglected for the investigated adhesion because this adhesion is purely physical (i.e., we assume that there no adhesion proteins are involved that could possibly be blocked by the incorporation of BSA into the RBC membrane). In agreement with the literature, we found that in most of the cases, both the cells on the petri dish as well as on the cantilever remained in their physiological, discocyte shape. The only purpose of the BSA is to passivate the surfaces of the cantilever and the petri dish. Thus, only the RBC surfaces contribute to the measured adhesion force arising from the depletion effect. Fig.\[BSA\]b shows an example force curve after BSA treatment of the cantilever and the petri dish. The shape and magnitude of the force distance curve changes significantly. The extraordinary flexibility of RBCs allows them to stay in contact over large withdrawing distances after adhering, as one can see in the measurements with BSA (Fig.\[BSA\]b). In the next step, the parameter setpoint force $F_{set}$, cantilever velocity $v$, and contact time $\tau$ of the cantilever were adjusted. Fig.\[parameters\]a shows the interaction energy as a function of $F_{set}$ for DEX70, DEX150 and a measurement without dextran (control). The influence of the choice of $F_{set}$ on the measured interaction energy is negligible and was set to $F_{set}=300\pico\newton$ for the remaining measurements. We will show below that we can describe our data well with a depletion model, but it is also known that macromolecular “bridging” between the RBCs can occur when the cells are in contact for a longer time [@Bronkhorst1997]. Bronkhorst et al.[@Bronkhorst1997] discovered that the time constant for those possible cross bridges is on the order of seconds. We varied the contact time from $\tau=0\second$ to $\tau=30\second$ to resolve the influence of the parameter $\tau$ (Fig.\[parameters\]b). Large contact times lead to increased adhesion energies and increased error bars. Both can be indications for bridging events. Therefore, we attempted to minimize the contact time by setting $\tau$ to $0\second$. Depending on the cantilever velocity, the RBCs will be in “physical” contact for a longer time because due to their flexibility, the RBCs can stay in contact over distances of several $\mu\meter$. Hence, to minimize the actual contact time (to exclude bridging effects), the cantilever velocity had to be sufficiently high. This ensures that the measured interaction energies are purely depletion-induced. Fig.\[parameters\]c shows the dependence of the cantilever velocity $v$ on the measured interaction energies. In the control measurements, no influence of the velocity could be seen. On the contrary, a dependence of the velocity could be observed in the dextran measurements. We do not have a conclusive explanation for this dependence, but we assume that higher interaction energies lead to larger viscoelastic effects while deforming the RBCs. Due to the higher velocity, the RBCs are deformed to greater extent, and this might lead to higher apparent interaction energies. Up to a certain velocity, the effect of velocity can be neglected; e.g., for DEX70 this effect begins at velocities only higher than $9 \mu\meter/\second$. At high velocities, in the DEX150 measurements, this effect can be significant, while for moderate velocities, this effect is still less than the error measurement. As mentioned above, it is necessary to minimize the contact time such that any bridging effects can be excluded; i.e., the cantilever velocity must not be too small. Therefore, in all measurements, the cantilever velocity was chosen as $v=5 \micro\meter/\second$.\
Fig.\[interaction\_energy\] shows the dependence of the adhesion force and the interaction energy on the dextran concentration. Each data point represents an average of 100 force curves for the same cell. The measured interaction energies are in excellent agreement with the predicted interaction energies given by Neu et al. [@Neu2002],who used an analytical approach to calculate the depletion interaction energy $E_D$ between two RBCs [@Neu2002]: $$E_D=-2\pi(\Delta-d/2+\delta-p)$$ where $\pi$ is the osmotic pressure, $\Delta$ is thickness of the depletion layer, d is the separation distance between adjacent surfaces, $\delta$ is the glycocalyx thickness and p is the depth of polymer penetration into the glycocalyx. Their model combines electrostatic repulsion due to RBC surface charge and osmotic attractive forces due to polymer depletion near the RBC surface. The theory considers the soft surfaces of RBCs and the subsequent penetration depth $p$ of polymers into the surface. This penetration depth $p$ depends on the polymer type, concentration, and molecular size and is expected to be larger for small molecules and to increase with increasing polymer concentration due to increasing osmotic pressure $\pi$. With increasing osmotic pressure, the penetration of macromolecules into the soft RBCs deepens, impeding the depletion of macromolecules between both cells and hence reducing the interaction energy. Above a threshold concentration this effect becomes dominant, and this decreases the interaction energy, even though the concentration of macromolecules is increasing further. Taking the depletion effect and the soft surfaces of the RBCs into account, a bell-shaped dependence of the interaction energy on the dextran concentration was calculated (the solid line in Fig.\[interaction\_energy\]b).\
In conclusion, we have presented single cell force spectroscopy measurements on dextran-induced red blood cell aggregation. The presence of dextran mimics the plasma molecules that lead to the formation of rouleaux under physiological conditions. Our findings are in excellent agreement with previous studies [@Neu2002], and they can be described by a model based on the depletion effect. For contact times longer than a few seconds we find a slight tendency towards stronger adhesion energies. We can not conclusively decide whether this is due to bridging of the macromolecules between two cells or due to some other effect. One would need a sideview [@Canetta2005] of the adhesion areas while performing the adhesion tests to analyze this effect in greater detail.
Acknowledgements
================
This work was supported by the German graduate school GRK 1276 and the Nanoscience Foundation. We thank JPK Instruments for preliminary help with the experiments.
References
==========
[22]{}ifxundefined \[1\][ ifx[\#1]{} ]{}ifnum \[1\][ \#1firstoftwo secondoftwo ]{}ifx \[1\][ \#1firstoftwo secondoftwo ]{}““\#1””@noop \[0\][secondoftwo]{}sanitize@url \[0\][‘\
12‘\$12 ‘&12‘\#12‘12‘\_12‘%12]{}@startlink\[1\]@endlink\[0\]@bib@innerbibempty @noop [****, ()]{} @noop [****, ()]{} @noop [****, ()]{} @noop [****, ()]{} @noop [****, ()]{} @noop [**]{} (, ) @noop [****, ()]{} @noop [****, ()]{} @noop [****, ()]{} @noop [****, ()]{} @noop [****, ()]{} @noop [****, ()]{} @noop [****, ()]{} @noop [****, ()]{} @noop [****, ()]{} @noop [****, ()]{} @noop [****, ()]{} @noop [****, ()]{} @noop [****, ()]{} @noop [****, ()]{} @noop [****, ()]{} @noop [****, ()]{}
Figure captions
===============
\[ht!\] ![a) Snapshot of a rouleau of 7 RBCs in a dextran solution. b) A sketch of the working principle of single cell force spectroscopy (SCFS). A single cell is attached to the pre-functionalized cantilever and is lowered onto another cell, which is fixed at the bottom. The adhesion force and adhesion energy are measured while withdrawing the cells.[]{data-label="Introduction"}](Figure1.eps "fig:")
\[ht!\] ![a) and b) show the effects of BSA treatment (see the text for details). Without BSA treatment, undesired adhesion events occur whose origin is not the investigated depletion effect; e.g., the cells don’t hit concentrically and the lower cell touches the Cell-Tak (i.e., a stonger adhesion force is measured because of the strong adhesiveness of the Cell-Tak). With BSA treatment, the Cell-Tak is completely passivated and the influence of those undesired adhesion events is minimized, as the changes in shape and magnitude of the measured force curve document. []{data-label="BSA"}](Figure2.eps "fig:")
\[ht!\] ![Parameter measurements: a) shows the dependence of the measured adhesion energy on the chosen force setpoint $F_{set}$. In all measurements, no significant dependence on $F_{set}$ was observed. b) shows the dependence of the measured adhesion energy on the chosen contact time $\tau$ of both cells. Increasing contact time leads to an increase in interaction energy and error bars. c) shows the dependence of the measured adhesion energy on the chosen withdrawal velocity $v$ of the cantilever. At higher velocities in the DEX150 measurements a dependence on the cantilever velocity was observed, but for moderate velocities this dependence was still less than the error in the measurement. []{data-label="parameters"}](Figure3.eps "fig:")
\[ht!\] ![a) The measured adhesion forces of the dextrans at different concentrations. The maximum interaction strengths were observed at $2 \gram/\deci\litre$ (DEX70) and $4 \gram/\deci\litre$ (DEX150). b) the dependence of the interaction energy of two red blood cells on the concentrations of two dextran types. The solid line represents the curve calculated by Neu et al. [@Neu2002]. []{data-label="interaction_energy"}](Figure4.eps "fig:")
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
author:
- |
Michal Kolář, Michael Lässig, Johannes Berg\
Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität zu Köln\
Zülpicher Stra[ß]{}e 77, 50937 Köln, Germany\
title: ' From Protein Interactions to Functional Annotation: Graph Alignment in [*Herpes*]{} '
---
Abstract {#abstract .unnumbered}
--------
Sequence alignment forms the basis of many methods for functional annotation by phylogenetic comparison, but becomes unreliable in the “twilight” regions of high sequence divergence and short gene length. Here we perform a cross-species comparison of two herpesviruses, VZV and KSHV, with a hybrid method called [*graph alignment*]{}. The method is based jointly on the similarity of protein interaction networks and on sequence similarity. In our alignment, we find open reading frames for which interaction similarity concurs with a low level of sequence similarity, thus confirming the evolutionary relationship. In addition, we find high levels of interaction similarity between open reading frames without any detectable sequence similarity. The functional predictions derived from this alignment are consistent with genomic position and gene expression data.
Introduction {#introduction .unnumbered}
------------
With the advent of genome-wide functional data, cross-species comparisons are no longer limited to sequence information. A classic extension of sequence alignment is structural alignment, which has been used to compare evolutionary distant RNAs [@a-ha-etal-2005] and proteins conserved in structure rather than sequence [@a-bo-sh-2003; @a-zh-sk-2005]. Here we use protein interactions as evolutionary information beyond sequence [@a-ue-etal-2005]. We perform a cross-species analysis of two herpes viruses, the varicella-zoster virus (VZV[^1]), causing chicken pox and shingles, and the Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), responsible for cancer of the connective tissue. The two viruses have diverged approximately $200$ million years ago. Their sequence dynamics is characterised by a high rate of point mutations (at least an order of magnitude faster than their host populations [@a-mc-co-1994]) and a high rate of gain and loss of genes (an order of magnitude higher than the mutation rates of procaryotes [@a-al-etal-2001]). As a result, the sequence similarity between the two species is in the “twilight” region of detection by alignment: homologous proteins have an amino acid sequence identity of about $20\%$. Moreover, many open reading frames are only about $60$ amino acids long.
The protein interactions in both species have recently been measured by a yeast two-hybrid screen [@a-ue-etal-2005]. Together with regulatory couplings, protein interactions are believed to be an important source of phenotypic change, possibly more so than the overall change of coding sequences [@a-King:1975; @a-BeltraoSerrano07]. Protein interactions are encoded in mutually matching binding domains. The evolutionary dynamics of these domains is governed by different selection and hence, by different tempi than the overall coding sequence. Moreover, amino acids relevant for binding are difficult to localise from sequence data alone, and the sequence of a domain may evolve considerably while its interaction is conserved. Therefore, we treat the experimental interaction data as evolutionary information independent of sequence data. However, these data are noisy as well, not least due to the experimental difficulties of high-throughput measurements.
Our hybrid comparison method called [*graph alignment*]{} jointly uses the similarity of protein interactions and of coding sequences to establish a mapping between genes of two species [@a-BergLaessig:06]. The underlying evolution involves a number of distinct processes, including divergent sequence evolution, gain and loss of interactions, duplication of genes and the corresponding interactions, and gain and loss of genes. Functional relationships may stem from common ancestry and thus be detectable by sequence [*homology*]{}, but they may also arise by convergent evolution, this [*analogy*]{} displayed by similar interactions without sequence similarity. An example is given in Figure \[a-fig:nogd\], where one gene has functionally replaced another gene by acquiring its interactions, a process called non-orthologous gene displacement [@a-ko-mu-bo-1996]. Similarly, an orthologous gene pair may diverge in sequence beyond detectability, but conserved interaction patterns remain detectable due to functional constraints. Such functional relationships are deduced from the network of interactions between genes. Computationally, graph alignment rests on a probabilistic scoring system, which weighs the cross-species similarities of sequences and interaction networks based on their evolutionary rates. Our method simplifies in special cases: (i) If gene sequences are well conserved and gene displacements are rare, one may restrict the map between genes or proteins to sequence homology (green lines in Figure \[a-fig:nogd\]) and, for example, identify network parts enriched in conserved links [@a-SharanSuthrametal:2005; @a-ba-sh-id-2006]. (ii) Conversely, if sequence similarity has uniformly decayed below the significance threshold, one can construct a map between genes or proteins based solely on the interactions between them [@a-Trusinaetal:2005].
![\[a-fig:nogd\] In this example, the gene labelled $C$ is replaced in one lineage with its functional equivalent $E$, which has the same interaction partners in the network. While some genes can still be correctly mapped across species using sequence information (green lines), the full evolutionary history and the mapping $C^{\prime}-E^{\star}$ are accessible from cross-species analysis only by taking into account the interaction networks.](Figures/a-figure1.pdf)
For the graph alignment between the VZV and KSHV viruses studied in this paper, both the interaction networks and the gene sequences are crucial to determine functional relationships, while each part of the data by itself is often insufficient. In particular, we find protein pairs with low sequence similarity for which the interaction similarity strengthens the statistical inference of homology, as well as protein pairs without sequence similarity, which are aligned based on their interactions alone. We use this alignment to make functional predictions. These predictions turn out to be consistent with published experimental data where available.
Theory {#theory .unnumbered}
------
[**Scoring graph alignments.**]{} We use a recently developed method for the alignment of graphs [@a-BergLaessig:06], adapted to the specific situation of sparse interaction networks with a low number of matching links. Open reading frames are represented by nodes, and pairwise protein interactions are represented by links between nodes. A graph alignment $\pi$ is a mapping of nodes of one network to nodes of the other network. The alignment is characterised by (i) interaction similarity of aligned nodes and (ii) sequence similarity of the aligned nodes.
Matching links in the two networks give a positive contribution to the score: aligned node pairs $i$ and $j=\pi(i)$, and $i'$ and $j'=\pi(i')$ contribute a positive score if a link is present both between the pair $(i,i')$ in one network and $(j,j')$ in the other network. An example are the links between $D^{\prime}-C^{\prime}$ and $D^{\star}-E^{\star}$ in Figure \[a-fig:nogd\]. A negative contribution results if a link is present in one network, but not in the other (mismatched links, as $D^{\prime}-B^{\prime}$ and $D^{\star}-B^{\star}$ in Figure \[a-fig:nogd\]). The values of the link scores are encoded in the link scoring function $s_l(a,b)$ where $a \in {1,0}$ (link present or absent in one network), and likewise $b
\in {1,0}$ (link present or absent in the other network). For binary links this scoring function is a $2 \times 2$ matrix, conceptually related to the scoring matrices in sequence alignment. In addition to interaction similarity, the sequence similarities $\theta_{ij}$ between nodes contribute to the score, rewarding similarity between aligned pairs and penalising similarity between pairs not respected by the alignment.
The total graph alignment score is the sum of independent contributions from sequence similarity and from link similarity. As a result, a pair of nodes may be aligned because of high sequence similarity, or because of high node similarity, or both. Of course, the interplay between sequence similarity and link similarity depends crucially on the relative weight of node score and link score. These scoring functions are determined self-consistently from the data within a Bayesian framework, see supplementary text.
[**Graph alignment algorithm.**]{} We use an iterative algorithm described in [@a-BergLaessig:06] to find the graph alignment with maximal score, based on a mapping to the quadratic assignment problem. At each step the highest scoring alignment is identified individually for each node, while keeping the rest of the alignment fixed. A certain amount of noise is used to help the alignment to escape from local score maxima (as in simulated annealing [@a-Kirckpatrick]). This noise amplitude is gradually decreased to zero, starting from some initial value $T$ and an initial alignment of reciprocal best sequence matches.
[**Alignment regimes and method tests.**]{} We test our alignment procedure on correlated random graphs, comparable in size and average connectivity to the protein interaction networks of KSHV and VZV. Two such graphs are generated from a common ancestor graph by independently adding and deleting a certain fraction of links (see supplementary text for details). In addition, we specify the sequence similarities for a subset of the node pairs. The correct alignment maps all orthologous pairs, including those where no sequence information is specified.
For network pairs with high connectivity and high link similarity, the alignment is faithful and reproducible, independently of the noise level $T$. For example, given $80$ nodes with $60$ sequence orthologs specified, and $140$ links of which approx. $100$ match, the alignment reproduces all nodes with sequence orthologs and $70\%$ of those without. The finite recovery rate stems from node pairs lacking any matching links.
For network pairs with low link similarity, we find two different alignment regimes depending on the initial noise level $T$.
\(i) In the [*high-fidelity*]{} regime for values of $T$ well below a threshold value $T_D$, the alignment consists mainly of the nodes with sequence similarity, but does not extend much beyond. For example, if only approx. 50 of 140 links match in the above network pair, the final alignment for $T=4$ contains all 32 node pairs with sequence similarity but only 4 node pairs without sequence similarity, all of which are correctly aligned.
\(ii) In the [*low-fidelity*]{} regime for $T$ above $T_D$, high-scoring alignments contain many link matches (even more than in the correct alignment), but different runs have little overlap and most nodes (even with sequence similarity) are misaligned. Correspondingly, the alignment has a high link score and a low node score, see Figure \[a-fig:weaksimER\](a). In the above example, only $29$ of $32$ nodes with sequence similarity are correctly aligned and as many as $14$ of $21$ nodes without sequence similarity are misaligned at $T=8$. This behaviour is generic to graph alignment, independent of score function and details of the algorithm. The high-scoring alignments in the low-fidelity regime are random islands of locally matching links. Their occurrence can be understood from the special case of two uncorrelated graphs with a narrow range of connectivities. Aligning a pair of randomly chosen nodes with each other, their neighbours, and their next neighbours, etc., will lead to a high link score (possibly offset to some extent by a low node score). There are many such alignments with a high score, yet low statistical significance. These spurious alignments occur for sparse networks at sufficiently low fractions of link matches and low numbers of nodes with sequence similarity. They are comparable to the score islands known in local sequence alignment [@a-hw-la-1996], except that in graph alignment the number of such “islands” is much greater than in sequences.
\(iii) Hence, [*optimal detection*]{} of similarity occurs in the high-fidelity regime for values of $T$ just below $T_D$; see Figure \[a-fig:weaksimER\](b). In this region the alignment is still guided by sequence similarity, yet extends as much as possible into the set of nodes without sequence similarity. The corresponding ROC curve is shown in the supplementary text. In the above example, this conservative approach correctly aligns $5$ pairs of $48$ without sequence similarity for $T = 5$, and there is no misalignment. The same way of choosing $T$ is applied to the real protein interaction network data.
 \[a-fig:weaksimER\]
Results {#results .unnumbered}
-------
[**Optimal graph alignment between VZV and KSHV.**]{} The protein interaction network of the herpes virus VZV consists of $76$ Orfs and $173$ protein-protein interactions (of these Orfs, $19$ have no detected interactions and are disregarded from the subsequent analysis). The protein interaction network of KSHV consists of $84$ Orfs and $123$ interactions ($34$ Orfs have no detected interactions). Thirty-four Orfs in VZV have reciprocally best matching sequence homologs with reading frames in KSHV. Between pairs of Orfs with such homologous partners, there are $44$ interactions in VZV and $25$ interactions in KSHV. Of these interactions, $8$ occur in both species, that is the overlap between interaction networks is about $13\%$ when the alignment is given by sequence homology.
The optimal alignment of the two networks is shown in Figure \[a-fig:alignKSHV\_VZV\](a). For the list of aligned Orfs and details on the scoring see the supplementary text. The alignment consists of $26$ pairs of aligned Orfs, spanning one third of the protein interaction networks of VZV and KSHV. The alignment contains $44$ interactions, $10$ of which are self-interactions. Of the $34$ interactions between distinct Orfs, $11$ are matching interactions occurring in both protein interaction networks, only one of the $10$ self-interactions matches. Of the $26$ pairs of aligned Orfs, $24$ pairs have detectable sequence similarity. The remaining $2$ aligned pairs involve Orfs which have no detectable sequence similarity with each other or any other Orf. The mean connectivity of the aligned part of the protein interaction network network is $3.0$ interactions per Orf, compared with a mean connectivity of $2.4$ of VZV and $1.5$ of KSHV.
The quality of the alignment we have obtained can be tested by comparing the genomic positions of the aligned Orfs. We count the ranks of Orfs from the initial terminal repeats of the two genomes (left TR of KSHV, TRL of VZV). In Figure \[a-fig:poshom\](a) the ranks of reading frames in VZV are plotted against the ranks of their alignment partners in KSHV. Aligned Orfs without any sequence similarity fit very well into the sequence of Orfs in their respective genomes. In addition, the molecular weights of the aligned nodes are highly correlated, see Figure \[a-fig:poshom\](b).
\[a-fig:poshom\]
In some cases, sequence similar pairs of Orfs are not aligned because of mismatched interactions. As an extreme case an Orf may have several interactions in one species, but none in the other, indicating most likely an unsuccessful Y2H experiment. Examples are KSHV Orf64/VZV Orf22, 22/37, 42/53, 36/47, and 33/44.
[**Functional relationships detected by interaction similarity.**]{} Some Orfs are aligned due to their matching interactions, either with low or with no detectable sequence similarity. We discuss these cases separately.
[*KSHV Orf67.5/VZV Orf25.*]{} These Orfs have a sequence identity of only $18\%$ over $76$ aa (see Methods for details). They are listed as homologs in the VIDA3 database [@a-al-etal-2001b], and both of them are thought to be homologs of the HHV-1 protein U$_\mathrm{L}$33 [@a-re-fa-ba-2000]. The alignment of these Orfs largely results from $4$ matching links out of $5$ in KSHV and $12$ in VZV (p-value of $4\times 10^{-3}$, see supplementary text for details) with a local link score $S_L=4.57$ versus node score $S_N=4.20$. Our alignment thus confirms the homology.
[*KSHV Orf28/VZV Orf65.*]{} These Orfs have a sequence identity of only $11\%$ over 102 aa. They are not listed as sequence homologs in databases VOCS [@a-hi-up-2000], VIDA3 [@a-al-etal-2001b] and NCBI [@a-ba-etal-2004]. However, the sequence alignment extends over their complete length, with no gaps. Again, the alignment of these nodes results from $4$ matching links out of $4$ in KSHV and out of $5$ in VZV (p-value of $10^{-3}$) with a local link score $S_L=6.30$ versus node score $S_N=3.50$. Functional annotation is available only for VZV Orf65; it belongs to the membrane/glycoprotein class, most likely it is a type-II membrane protein [@a-co-etal-2001]. The alignment of KSHV Orf28 with VZV Orf65 leads us to predict that KSHV Orf28 also codes for a membrane glycoprotein.
Several experimental studies support this prediction. Gene expression studies show that Orf28 is co-expressed with tertiary lytic Orfs and hence probably falls in the classes of structural or host–virus-interaction genes [@a-je-etal-2001; @a-mu-etal-2001]. The expression of Orf28 is affected by blocking DNA replication [@a-lu-etal-2004] showing Orf28 is a secondary or tertiary gene. Furthermore, Orf28 has been detected in the virion by mass spectroscopy, leading to a tentative functional classification as a glycoprotein–envelope protein [@a-zh-etal-2005]. Finally, Orf28 is a positional homolog of the Epstein-Barr virus Orf BDLF3, which is known to encode glycoprotein gp150.
[*KSHV Orf23/VZV Orf39.*]{} These Orfs have no significant sequence similarity: although the alignment obtained with clustalW [@a-clustalW] has a sequence identity of $18\%$ over $240$ aa, it is statistically insignificant; a randomised test yields a p-value of $0.43$. A systematic analysis involving a wide range of different scoring parameters does not yield a statistically significant sequence alignment either (see supplementary text). The reading frames KSHV Orf23 and VZV Orf39 are aligned purely due to $3$ matching interactions out of $4$ of KSHV and $4$ of VZV (p-value $2\times 10^{-2}$). The local link score equals $4.47$ versus a node score of $-0.49$. Functional classification is available only for VZV Orf39 as a membrane/glycoprotein [@a-al-etal-2001b]. The alignment thus leads us to predict that KSHV Orf23 also codes for a membrane glycoprotein.
This prediction is supported by several experimental studies. Again Orf23 is co-expressed with tertiary lytic Orfs [@a-je-etal-2001] and is sensitive to blocked DNA replication [@a-lu-etal-2004], so it is a late gene. The expression patterns of Orf23 are similar to those of structural and packaging genes.
[*KSHV Orf41/VZV Orf60.*]{} These Orfs have $3$ matching interactions out of $3$ in KSHV and $6$ in VZV ($p=2\times 10^{-2}$), but no significant sequence similarity (The *clustalW* sequence alignment has identity of $12\%$ over $160$ aa with p-value $0.94$). They are aligned with a local link score of $4.39$ versus a node score of $-0.49$. Both Orfs are functionally annotated. KSHV Orf41 codes for a helicase/primase associated factor [@a-wu-etal-2001] and is not affected by blocking DNA replication [@a-lu-etal-2004]. On the other hand, VZV Orf60 codes for the glycoprotein L [@a-al-etal-2001b; @a-ma-etal-2000]. It may be that either of them has a so-far unknown function, leading to the matching protein interactions. This idea finds support in [@a-je-etal-2001], where the expression maximum of Orf41 was found to come after the secondary lytic phase. This is surprising because the transcript is needed already during the secondary lytic phase (DNA replication). No other DNA-replicating gene controlled by a different operon to KSHV Orf41 has an expression dynamics with this property. Such a delay of the maximum of expression may have two reasons: either the transcription of the Orf41 is not controlled after its role is finished, or Orf41 indeed has a hitherto uncharacterised function in the tertiary lytic phase, possibly a structural one.
We also note that Orf41 is specific to the class of $\gamma$-herpesviruses, of which KSHV is a member. Analogously, Orf60 is $\alpha$-herpesvirus specific. It is possible that the homolog of Orf41 in VZV and the homolog of Orf60 in KSHV were lost as a result of either of these proteins acquiring a new function. This would be an example of non-orthologous gene displacement [@a-ko-mu-bo-1996].
[**Interaction clusters.**]{} The alignment shown in the Figure \[a-fig:alignKSHV\_VZV\](a) contains a cluster of genes all interacting with each other. This cluster comprises the aligned pairs KSHV Orf23/VZV Orf39, 28/65, 29b/42, and 67.5/25 connected by matching links only. The p-value for such a fully connected cluster (a clique) to emerge at random is approximately $5 \times 10^{-11}$. The pair KSHV Orf41/VZV Orf60 discussed above is connected to this cluster by two matching links, forming an almost fully connected cluster of $5$ Orfs pairs with $8$ of $10$ possible links present and matching. Surprisingly, while all the other Orfs in the cluster code for structural proteins (virion assembly and structure proteins), Orf41 of KSHV is annotated as a helicase/primase associated factor, and hence a gene involved in DNA replication. The association with structure-related genes may be interpreted as a further evidence towards another function of Orf41 as a structural Orf.
The individual species contain further clusters, but these are not conserved across species. The cluster comprising Orfs 28, 29b, 41 and K10 in KSHV contains genes coding for predicted virion proteins, virion assembly and host–virus interaction proteins. Orfs 25, 19, 27, and 38 forming a fully connected cluster in VZV code for proteins involved in virion assembly, nucleotide repair, metabolism, and host–virus interaction.
Discussion {#discussion .unnumbered}
----------
[**Graph alignment results from sequence and interaction similarity.**]{} Our alignment of Orfs in two different herpes viruses yields a cross-species mapping between Orfs based jointly on the correlation between amino acid sequences and on the correlation between their protein interactions. This approach is distinct from searching for the overrepresentation of matching interactions among sequence homologs [@a-ke-etal-2003]. It allows the identification of homology in cases where sequence similarity between two Orfs has decayed to statistically insignificant levels. The resolution of this ‘twilight region’ of sequence similarity by using the information on protein interactions is particularly relevant for the case of short genes (such as in the present application), or high levels of domain shuffling. It also allows to detect functional analogs, proteins with similar interactions but without common ancestry.
[**Functional predictions from interaction similarity.**]{} We find several cases of Orfs with no detectable sequence similarity which are aligned with each other solely on the basis of matching interactions. There are different possible mechanisms generating this situation; (i) a pair of orthologous genes lose their sequence similarity, and (ii) a gene functionally substitutes for another gene. The original gene may then be excised from the genome without phenotypic effect. This process has been termed non-orthologous gene displacement [@a-ko-mu-bo-1996].
In both of these cases, sequence information is insufficient for functional prediction. Based on the alignment due to matching interactions and on the annotation of one of the alignment partners, we predict the function of several Orfs. These predictions are supported by gene expression experiments and by the genomic position of the Orfs.
[**Functional cluster as conserved subgraph.**]{} The optimal alignment (Figure \[a-fig:alignKSHV\_VZV\](a)) contains a cluster of $4$ Orfs whose products all interact with each other in both viruses. All members of this cluster belong to a single functional class; they are involved in virion formation and structure and code for tertiary lytic transcripts.
There are other fully connected clusters both in VZV and KSHV, but none of them occur in *both* viruses. These clusters contain proteins in different functional classes; one cluster in VZV contains proteins involved in virion assembly, nucleotide repair, metabolism, and host–virus interaction.
The guilt-by-association scheme of assigning like functions to interacting proteins [@a-ol-2000] would fail in these cases. Refinement of the principle to guilt-by-conserved-association, where functional correlation is only assumed for proteins with an interaction in *both* species, correctly describes the functional correlations in the above clusters. Looking at the functions of interacting genes in a single species, the functional classes are only correlated very weakly (mutual information entropy of $0.006$ bits, see supplementary text). However, pairs of proteins with conserved interactions are more likely to share the same function (mutual information entropy of $0.107$ bits).
Guilt-by-conserved-association might go beyond the statistical significance gained from filtering false positives by cross-species comparison. Interactions between proteins of the same functional class are $1.6$ times as likely to be conserved between VZV and KSHV than interactions between proteins of different functions. Correspondingly, the mutual information on links between homologous pairs of Orfs is nearly ten times higher for Orfs of the same function than for Orfs of different function. This points to a particular mode of evolution of protein interactions, namely interactions between proteins of like function changing more slowly than those between proteins of different function. Multi-species alignments of interactions networks will provide an opportunity to address evolutionary questions of this type by tracing the dynamics of interactions along the phylogenetic tree.
[**Data deposition:**]{} The protein interactions for KSHV strain BC-1 and VZV Oka-parental were taken from the yeast two-hybrid screens (Y2H) of the Peter Uetz lab [@a-ue-etal-2005]. The sequences of the two herpesviruses were downloaded from the VOCs database [@a-hi-up-2000] and the NCBI database [@a-ba-etal-2004; @a-da-sc-1986; @a-ru-etal-1996].
[**Accession numbers:**]{} [**Genomes**]{}: KSHV: Human herpesvirus 8 strain cell line BC-1 (VOCs genome ID 890); VZV: Human herpesvirus 3 strain Oka parental (VOCs genome ID 921). [**KSHV Orfs**]{}: Orf 67.5: provided by Peter Uetz, sequence follows: “MEYASDQLLP RDMQILFPTI YCRLNAINYC QYLKTFLVQR AQPAACDHTL VLESKVDTVR QVLRKIVSTD AVFSEARARP”; Orf 28: Genbank accession NP\_572080.1; Orf 23: NP\_572075.1; Orf 41: NP\_572094.1; Orf 29b: NP\_572081.1. [**VZV Orfs**]{}: Orf25: VOCs ID 59436; Orf65: 59475; Orf39: 59450; Orf60: 59470; Orf42: 59453.
[**Acknowledgments:**]{} The authors thank Peter Uetz for several fruitful discussions and making the interaction data available prior to publication, Gordon Brown and Derek Gatherer for discussions on the protein sequence alignment, and Maria Mar Albà for providing functional information data. Funding from the DFG is acknowledged under grants SFB 680, SFB-TR12, and BE 2478/2-1. This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. PHY05-51164
Havgaard JH, Lyngso RB, Stormo GD, Gorodkin J (2005) [*Bioinformatics*]{} [21(9)]{}: 1815–24.
Ponomarenko JV, Bourne PE, Shindyalov IN (2005) [*Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics*]{} [58]{}: 855–865.
Zhang Y and Skolnick J (2005) [*Nucleic Acids Res.*]{} [33(7)]{}: 2302–2309.
Uetz P, Dong Y-A, Zeretzke C, Atzler C, Baiker A, Berger B, Rajagopala SV, Roupelieva M, Rose D, Fossum E, Haas J (2006) [*Science*]{} [311]{}: 239–242.
McGeoch DJ and Cook S (1994) [*J. Mol. Biol.*]{} [238]{}: 9–22.
Mar Albà M, Das R, Orengo CA, and Kellam P (2001) [*Genome Res.*]{} [11]{}: 43–54.
King MC and Wilson AC (1975) [*Science*]{} [188]{}: 107–166.
Beltrao P, Serrano L (2007) [*PLoS Comput Biol.*]{} [3(2)]{}: e25.
Berg J and Lässig M (2006) [*Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA*]{} [103(29)]{}: 10967–10972.
Koonin EV, Mushegian AR, Bork P (1996) [*Trends Genet.*]{} [12(9)]{}: 334–336.
Sharan R, Suthram S, Kelley RM, Kuhn T, McCuine S, Uetz P, Sittler T, Karp RM, and Ideker T (2005) [*Proc Natl Acad Sci USA*]{} [102(6)]{}: 1974–1979.
S. Bandyopadhyay, R. Sharan, and T. Ideker (2006) [*Genome Res.*]{} [16]{}: 428–435.
Trusina A, Sneppen K, Dodd IB, Shearwin KE, Egan JB (2005) [*PLoS Computational Biology*]{} [1(7)]{}: e74.
Hiscock D, Upton C (2000) [*Bioinformatics*]{} [16]{}: 484–485.
Bao Y, Federhen S, Leipe D, Pham V, Resenchuk S, Rozanov M, Tatusov R, and Tatusova T (2004) [*J Virol.*]{} [78(14)]{}: 7291–7298.
Davison AJ, Scott JE (1986) [*J Gen Virol.*]{} [67(9)]{}: 1759–1816.
Russo JJ, Bohenzky RA, Chien MC, Chen J, Yan M, Maddalena D, Parry JP, Peruzzi D, Edelman IS, Chang Y, Moore PS (1996) [*Proc Natl Acad Sci USA*]{} [93(25)]{}: 14862–14867.
Kirkpatrick, S., C. D. Gelatt Jr., M. P. Vecchi, (1983) [*Science*]{} [220]{}: 671–680.
Hwa T and Lässig M (1996) [*Phys. Rev. Lett.*]{} [76]{}: 2591–2594.
Mar Albà M, Lee D, Pearl FMG, Shepherd AJ, Martin N, Orengo CA, and Kellam P (2001) [*Nuleic Acids Research*]{} [29(1)]{}: 133–136.
Reynolds AE, Fan Y, Baines JD (2000) [*Virology*]{} [266(2)]{}: 310–318.
Cohen JI, Sato H, Srinivas S, and Lekstrom K (2001) [*Virology*]{} [280]{}: 62–71.
Jenner RG, Mar Albà M, Boshoff C, and Kellam P (2001) [*Journal of Virology*]{} [75(2)]{}: 891–902.
Paulose-Murphy M, Ha N-K, Xiang C, Chen Y, Gillim L, Yarchoan R, Meltzer P, Bittner M, Trent J, and Zeichner S (2001) [*Journal of Virology*]{} [75(10)]{}: 4843–4853.
Lu M, Suen J, Frias C, Pfeiffer R, Tsai M-H, Chuang E, and Zeichner SL (2004) [*Journal of Virology*]{} [78(24)]{}: 13637–13652.
Zhu FX, Chong JM, Wu L, and Yuan Y (2005) [*Journal of Virology*]{} [79(2)]{}: 800–811.
Thompson JD, Higgins DG and Gibson TJ (1994) [*Nucleic Acids Research*]{} [22]{}: 4673–4680.
Wu FY, Ahn J-H, Alcendor DJ, Jang W-J, Xiao J, Hayward DS and Hayward GS (2001) [*Journal of Virology*]{} [75(3)]{}: 1487–1506.
Marešová L, Kutinová L , Ludvíková V, Žák R, Mareš M, and Němečková Š (2000) [*Journal of General Virology*]{} [81]{}: 1545–1552.
Kelley BP, Sharan R, Karp RM, Sittler T, Root DE, Stockwell BR, Ideker T (2003) [*Proc Natl Acad Sci USA*]{} [100(20)]{}: 11394–11399.
Oliver S (2000) [*Nature*]{} [403]{}: 601–603.
[<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Supplemental Text</span>]{}
Networks comparison
===================
Protein interaction networks data
---------------------------------
The protein interaction data comes from the work of the group of Peter Uetz, [@ue-etal-2005], and is publicly available as the supplement of the cited article.
Network alignment
-----------------
The protein interaction data are represented by a network (a graph) in which each nodes represents an Orf of a species, and links denote experimentally observed protein interactions. The two herpesviral protein interaction networks are shown in the Figure \[networks\][^2]. We denote the KSHV[^3] network as $A$ and the VZV network as $B$ when applicable. The networks $A$ and $B$ are described by their adjacency matrices, which are square matrices with terms $a_{ij}$, $b_{ij}$ equal $1$ if there is a link between Orfs $i$ and $j$ in the respective interaction network and zero otherwise.
A *network alignment* of two networks is a one-to-one mapping $\pi$ from the set of nodes (Orfs) of the network $A$ to the set of nodes of the network $B$: $$\pi: \{i \in A\} \to \{j \in B\}, \quad j = \pi(i).$$ The nodes that are not aligned to any node in the other species, are in our implementation aligned to a virtual dummy node.
Each network alignment may be assessed by a score combining both interaction and sequence data. The score we define in the following text is a log-likelihood score that stems from the comparison of two models: a model of evolutionary related networks and the null model of independently created nodes and links. The score has two parts; the first contribution to the alignment score quantifies the similarity of interactions of the aligned Orfs that is the local topological likeness of the two networks. Hence it is connected with the links of the networks and we term it the *link score* $S_L$. The other part utilises the sequence similarity of aligned Orfs, and hence it is connected with the nodes. We term it the *node score* $S_N$. The two contributions sum up to make the total score of the alignment $$\label{totalScore}
S = S_L + S_N.$$
### Link score
The alignment of nodes induces an alignment of links; a link present between two nodes in one network may either be present or absent between their alignment partners in the other network. The topological part of the score is expressed as a sum of all rewards for aligned links that are present in both networks (*matching links, conserved links*) and of all penalties for the links that are present in one network only (*mismatching links*). These rewards/penalties are parameterised by scoring matrices $s_l$ for links between different nodes and $s_s$ for self-links. If we denote by $A^\pi$ and $B^\pi$ the subnetworks of the networks $A$ and $B$ that are aligned, that is the sets of nodes that have alignment partners together with all links within these sets, we may write the total link score as $$\label{linkScore}
S_L(\pi) =\sum_{(ij)\in A^\pi} s_l(a_{ij}, b_{\pi(i)\pi(j)}) + \sum_{i\in A^\pi} s_s(a_{ii}, b_{\pi(i)\pi(i)}) \ ,$$ where $\pi(i)$ is the alignment partner of the node $i \in A$ in the network $B$.
The parameters $s_l$ and $s_s$ are inferred by comparison of the model of evolutionarily related networks and of the null hypothesis in which the networks evolved independently. While in the independently evolved networks the existence of links between nodes $i, i^\prime$ and $j = \pi(i), j^\prime = \pi(i^\prime)$ are uncorrelated, the existence of links between homologous genes in the two evolutionarily related networks will correlate. The extend of this correlation, which depends on the evolutionary distance of the two networks, specifies the magnitude of the scoring parameters $s_l$ and $s_s$. We infer their values from the available protein–interaction data in the Section \[ScoreParameters\].
### Node score
In general, we expect that evolutionary related Orfs have correlated sequences and hence we want to reward the alignment of nodes with correlated sequences and penalise the alignment of pairs of nodes with dissimilar sequences. The measure of the similarity of the sequences is the score $\theta$ of the sequence alignment which will be thoroughly defined in the Section \[sequencesComparison\]. The node score is then parameterised by some function $s_1(\theta)$, which is to be inferred from the data and which we expect to be an increasing function of $\theta$. Similarly, we also want to penalise the existence of pairs of Orfs that are not aligned but have similar sequences. We expect the scoring function $s_2(\theta)$ which parameterises this contribution to the node score. Again this function needs to be inferred from the data and is expected to be a decreasing function of the sequence similarity $\theta$.
Both functions $s_1$ and $s_2$ express the differences between the evolutionarily related networks and the model of independently evolved networks. In the evolutionary model, we expect that homologous genes, that is genes with high sequence similarity $\theta$, are aligned. In the model of unrelated networks, we expect on the contrary, that the potentially aligned genes are not similar in their sequences. We expect also that in the evolutionarily model no pair of Orfs that are not aligned has high sequence similarity. Thus when compared to the unrelated networks of the null model, the frequency of such highly sequence similar pairs must be lower. The parameter functions $s_1$ and $s_2$ gauge the difference of the evolutionarily and unrelated–networks model and are inferred from the sequence and protein interaction data in the Section \[nodeScoreSection\]. The total node score is expressed as $$\label{nodeScore}
S_N(s_1, s_2, \pi) = \sum_{i \in A^\pi} s_1(\theta_{i\pi(i)}) + \sum_{\mathrm{others}} s_2(\theta_{jk}) \ ,$$ where we first sum all the rewards/penalties for the aligned pairs and then we add the contributions of all the pairs that are not aligned to each other but at least one Orf of the pair is aligned to some partner. The two symbolic sums may be rewritten for any alignment $\pi$ as $$\label{nodeScore2}
S_N(s_1, s_2, \pi) = \sum_{i\in A^\pi} \left[ s_1(\theta_{i\pi(i)})
+ \sum_{j\in B\setminus \pi(i)} w^\pi_{ij} s_2(\theta_{ij})
+ \sum_{j\in A\setminus i} w^\pi_{j\pi(i)} s_2(\theta_{j\pi(i)}) \right],$$ where $A\setminus i$ is the set of all nodes in $A$ but $i$ and the factor $w^\pi_{ij}$ prevents overcounting of score contributions. Its value is $1$, when only one of $i$ and $j$ is aligned, and $0.5$ when both nodes are aligned to different partners.
### Matrix representation of the score and the difference algorithm
The problem of finding the optimal network alignment is mapped to the quadratic assignment problem, which is solved iteratively by repeated solutions of the Linear Assignment Problem.
Both contributions to the alignment score, link and node score, can be expressed in a matrix form. The node score is encoded in the matrix $M^\pi$ and the topological part of the score in the matrix $R^\pi$: $$\label{totalScore1}
S = S_N + S_L = \mathrm{Tr} \; \pi (M^\pi + R^\pi) \ ,$$ with $$M_{ij}^\pi = \frac{1}{2} \sum_{k\in A^\pi, k\neq j, \pi(k)\neq i} s_l(a_{jk}, b_{i\pi(k)}) + s_s(a_{jj}, b_{ii}) \ ,$$ and $$R_{ij}^\pi = s_1(\theta_{ji}) + \sum_{k\in B\setminus i} w^\pi_{jk} s_2(\theta_{jk}) + \sum_{k\in A\setminus j} w^\pi_{ki} s_2(\theta_{ki}) \ .$$ $\mathrm{Tr} M$ stands for the trace of matrix $M$.
For the sake of algorithm performance, we use instead of the total score its generalised derivative, that is the change of the score upon addition or removal of a node pair $ji$ to the alignment. This approach makes the algorithm more greedy during the initial phase, yet keeps it exact in the final stage. The derivative as represented in a matrix form reads $$\Delta M_{ij}^\pi = \sum_{k\in A^\pi, k\neq j, \pi(k)\neq i} s_l(a_{jk}, b_{i\pi(k)}) + s_s(a_{jj}, b_{ii})$$ for the change of the node score and $$\Delta R_{ij}^\pi = s_1(\theta_{ji}) + \sum_{m\in B\setminus B^\pi, m\neq i} s_2(\theta_{jm}) + \sum_{m\in A\setminus A^\pi, m\neq j} s_2(\theta_{mi}) \ .$$ for the change of the link score. The iterative update of the alignment is then done according to the scoring matrix $\Delta M^\pi + \Delta R^\pi$, by repeatedly solving the linear–assignment problem instance, [@ma-to-1987]. $$\label{update2}
\pi \leftarrow \mathrm{argmax}_{\pi^\prime} \mathrm{Tr} \; \pi^\prime (\Delta M^\pi + \Delta R^\pi + T \chi \eta)$$ until convergence. A noise term has been added so the algorithm can escape from local score maxima: $\eta$ is a random matrix with terms drawn independently at each iteration from the normal distribution with the mean 0 and the standard deviation 1. The addition of this random matrix similar to the simulated annealing method of statistical physics, [@ki-ge-ve-1983]. The amplitude of the noise starts at an initial value $T$ and decreases continuously; the schedule function $\chi$ is a linear function decreasing from 1 at the beginning of the algorithm run to 0 at its end. The temperature $T$ specifies the depth valleys in the score landscape the algorithm can overcome and hence extent of the space of alignments that is sampled. The higher the temperature $T$, the larger the volume of the space of alignments that is sampled.
A package called *GraphAlignment* implementing this algorithm under the *R-project* is available for download on [@GraphAlignment].
### Score parameters {#ScoreParameters}
In order to find the score parameters, we evaluate the likelihood of the scenario in which the two networks evolved from a common ancestor and compare it to the likelihood of the null model of two independently created ER networks.
The likelihood of an alignment $\pi$ of the interaction networks $A$ and $B$ reads $$P(\pi | \{A,B\} )
= \frac{P(\{A,B\} | \pi) P(\pi)}{P(\{A,B\} )} \ ,$$ where, within the Viterbi approximation [@vi-1967], the prior $P(\{A,B\})$ consists of the two terms in comparison: the evolutionarily related model ($\pi$) and the null hypothesis ($R$). $$P(\{A,B\} ) = P(\{A,B\} | \pi) P(\pi) + P(\{A,B\} | R) P(R) \ .$$ The likelihood may be expressed in terms of a log-likelihood score $S$ in the form of the sum of the link and node score $S = S_L + S_N$, (\[totalScore\]),$$P(\pi | \{A,B\} ) = \frac{1}{1 +
e^{-S(\pi)}} \ .$$ This score consists of two independent terms: The contribution depending on the network topology in the conditional probabilities $P(\{A,B\}|\pi)$ and $P(\{A,B\}|R)$, and the contribution of the priors $P(\pi)$ and $P(R)$. The independence of the two terms allows us to assign the topological score $S_L$ to the first one and the node score $S_N$ to the latter term, $$\begin{aligned}
\label{totalScore2}
S_L & = & \ln \frac{P(\{A,B\} | \pi)}{P(\{A,B\} | R)}, \\ \nonumber
S_N & = & \ln \frac{P(\pi)}{P(R)}.\end{aligned}$$ By identifying (\[totalScore2\]) with (\[linkScore\], \[nodeScore\]) we can readily find the scoring matrices $s_s$ and $s_l$ together with the scoring functions $s_1$ and $s_2$. Before doing so, we introduce a new quantity, the density matrix, which allows us to control closely the behaviour of the aligning algorithm.
### Density matrix $\rho$
For the evaluation of the scoring parameters we accumulate the results of several runs of the alignment algorithm.
To store this data, we define the density matrix $\rho$ in the following way. We count the number of times $m_{ij}$ a pair of nodes $i\in A$ and $j\in B$ were aligned in $M$ runs of the algorithm, and set the corresponding matrix term $\rho_{ij}= m_{ij} / M$. We can rewrite the definition in terms of the resulting alignments $\pi^\alpha$, $$\label{density}
\rho_{ij} = \frac{1}{M} \sum_{\alpha = 1}^M \delta(\pi^\alpha(i), j) \ .$$ By $\pi^\alpha(i)$ we denote the alignment partner of the node $i\in A$ in the graph $B$ in the run $\alpha$. The term $\rho_{ij}$ of the density matrix then approximates the probability of finding the pair $(ij)$ in the final alignment.
### Mean values of the scoring parameters {#nodeScoreSection}
For the evaluation of the link score matrices we count frequencies matched/mismatched links in the alignment. That is, for each pair $(i,i^\prime) \in A$ and the alignment partners $j = \pi(i)$ and $j^\prime = \pi(i^\prime)$ the terms $a_{ii^\prime}$ and $b_{jj^\prime}$ of the entries of the adjacency matrices are compared and the frequency table is accordingly updated. We calculate the frequency tables both for the links and the self-links: $$\begin{aligned}
q_l(a,b) & = &\frac{1}{N_l} \sum_{(i,j)\in A} \sum_{(k,l) \in B} \rho_{ik} \rho_{jl}
\delta({a_{ij}, a}) \delta({b_{kl}, b}), \\ \nonumber
q_s(a,b) & = &\frac{1}{N_s} \sum_{i\in A} \sum_{k \in B} \rho_{ik}
\delta({a_{ii}, a}) \delta({b_{kk}, b}) \ ,\end{aligned}$$ where $N_l$ and $N_s$ are the normalisation constants of the two distributions and $a,b \in \{0,1\}$.
If the two networks evolved independently, as it is assumed in the null model, we can marginalise the frequency tables and find the probabilities of having a link between two nodes in the graph $A$ or $B$, $$\begin{aligned}
p_l^A(a) & = & \sum_{b = 0}^1 q_l(a, b), \\ \nonumber
p_l^B(b) & = & \sum_{a = 0}^1 q_l(a, b). \\\end{aligned}$$ By the marginalisation of the self link distribution, we obtain $p_s^A$ and $p_s^B$.
Finally, we obtain the score parameters $s_l$ and $s_s$ by comparing the null and evolutionary model, $$\label{linkScoring}
s_r(a,b) = \ln \frac{q_r(a,b)}{p_r^A(a) p_r^B(b)}, \quad r \in \{l, s\}.$$
Similarly, the node score parameters are inferred from the sequence similarities $\theta_{ij}$ and the current alignment. Three situations may occur for a pair of Orfs $i\in A$ and $j \in B$. Either the two Orfs are aligned in $\pi$, or they are aligned to some other partners, but not to each other, or they are not aligned to any partner. These three disjoint sets of pairs of Orfs define three ensembles for which we evaluate frequencies of the sequence similarity $\theta$; $d_1(\theta)$ for the aligned pairs, $d_2(\theta)$ for the second ensemble, and $d_0(\theta)$ for the pairs of nodes that are not aligned. We take the score $\theta$ as defined in the Section \[sequencesComparison\] as the sequence similarity measure. The three distributions of $\theta$ are $$\begin{aligned}
\label{meanField2}
d_1(\theta) & = & \frac{1}{N_1} \sum_{i\in A} \sum_{j\in B} \rho_{ij} \theta_{ij}, \\
d_2(\theta) & = & \frac{1}{N_2} \sum_{i\in A} \sum_{j\in B}
(1-\rho_{ij})
\left[ 1 - \prod_{k\in A, k\neq i} (1-\rho_{kj}) \prod_{l\in B, l\neq j} (1-\rho_{il}) \right]
\theta_{ij}, \\
d_0(\theta) & = & \frac{1}{N_0} \sum_{i\in A} \sum_{j\in B}
(1-\rho_{ij})
\prod_{k\in A, k\neq i} (1-\rho_{kj}) \prod_{l\in B, l\neq j} (1-\rho_{il})
\theta_{ij} \ ,\end{aligned}$$ where $N_0$, $N_1$, and $N_2$ are normalisation constants. In general, we expect $d_1(\theta)$ to be an increasing function of $\theta$, reflecting the fact that the aligned Orfs should have similar functions. Indeed, many sequence–homologous pairs belong to this set. The distribution $d_2(\theta)$ is, on the other hand, expected to be a decreasing function of $\theta$, similarly to $d_0(\theta)$.
The distribution $d_0(\theta)$ of similarities of unaligned Orfs may be considered as the background distribution of $\theta$, and is taken as the distribution in the null model. The node scores $s_1$ and $s_2$ read $$\label{nodeScoring}
s_r(\theta) = \ln \frac{d_r(\theta)}{d_0(\theta)},\quad r \in \{1,2\}.$$
### Consensus and pruned alignment
From the $\rho$ matrix we extract the consensus alignment as the alignment of Orfs that have the corresponding $\rho$-matrix term larger than $0.5$. This conservative choice of the cut-off is further discussed in the following section.
The consensus alignment is then pruned in order to remove marginally aligned pairs. These we define as the pairs that have a negative sequence score and at the same time less than two matching interactions. This pruning removes spuriously aligned pairs with both low sequence similarity and low topological match.
### Estimate of the p-value of the network alignment
To calculate the p-value of aligning two nodes $i\in A$ and $j\in B$, we remove the pair $(ij)$ from the alignment and find the probability of placing in the vacancy a pair of nodes with a topological match as good or better than the match of the pair $(ij)$. These two nodes are chosen from two ER networks with sizes and mean connectivities identical to those of the KSHV and VZV networks. These two unrelated ER graphs correspond to the null model of independently evolved networks.
A pair of nodes has the same or better topological match whenever it has the same or a larger number of matching links to other aligned pairs or it has a smaller number of mismatching links. For the pair $(ij)$ with $r$ matching links in the alignment graph (Figure 3a in the main text) the p-value is defined as the probability of finding a nodes pair with $r$ or more matching links and at most $n_A-r$ (resp. $n_B-r$) mismatching links, where $n_A$ ($n_B$) is the total number of links adjacent to $i$ in $A^\pi$ ($j$ in $B^\pi$).
This probability is easily evaluated for uncorrelated networks using the multinomial distribution. For $p_A \ll 1$ and $p_B \ll 1$ it reads $$\begin{aligned}
\label{pValue1}
& & \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
p(r, n_A, n_B, N^\pi) = \\ \nonumber
& &
(N_A - N^\pi + 1) (N_B - N^\pi + 1) \\ \nonumber
& &
\times \;\; \sum_{m_A=r}^{n_A} \sum_{m_B=r}^{n_B} \sum_{s=r}^{s = \min\{m_A, m_B\}} \begin{pmatrix} N^\pi - 1 \\
s, m_A - s, m_B - s, N^\pi - 1 - m_A - m_B + s \end{pmatrix}\\ \nonumber
& &
\times \;\; [p_A p_B]^s [p_A (1-p_B)]^{m_A - s} [(1-p_A) p_B]^{m_B - s} [(1-p_A) (1-p_B)]^{N^\pi - 1 - m_A - m_B + s}
\ ,\end{aligned}$$ where $N^\pi$ is the size of the aligned subnetworks ($N^\pi = 26$), and $p_A$ and $p_B$ are the link probabilities in the two ER graphs which we estimate from the complete KSHV and VZV networks respectively, giving $p_A = 0.0330$ and $p_B = 0.0561$. The individual terms of equation (\[pValue1\]) can be understood intuitively: first we choose a node in the network $A\setminus A^\pi \cup i$ (one node out of $N_A - N^\pi + 1$), and a partner node from the network $B\setminus B^\pi \cup j$. Next we choose from the $N^\pi-1$ remaining nodes in the alignment network $s$ nodes that are connected by matching links with the probability $p_A p_B$, $m_A - s$ (resp. $m_B - s$) nodes that are connected by links only in the KSHV (VZV) subnetwork with appropriate probability, and the remaining nodes that are not linked to the pair $(ij)$ in either subnetwork. Finally, we sum over all possible choices of the nodes (the multinomial coefficient) and over all options that are equally good or better than the actual alignment of $(ij)$. The contribution from the self–links (which are typically mismatching) is close but smaller than $1$ and is neglected here. The result is then an upper bound of the p-value. The estimated p-values for the pairs of Orfs discussed in the main text are listed in the Table \[alignedPairs2\].
Similarly, we estimate the p-value of finding in the alignment networks a clique with $M_C$ pairs, out of which $M_O$ pairs are sequence related, and which are connected by matching links only. We calculate this p-value as the probability of finding such a clique and of finding among the links adjacent to the vertices of the clique the same number or more matching links and the same number or less of links that are present in one PIN only. Denoting the pairs of the clique $(i^aj^a)$, where $a\in \{1,2,\ldots,M_C - M_O\}$, the numbers of the matching links $r^a$, and the total number of links adjacent to $i^a$ ($j^a$) in KSHV (VZV) as $n_A^a$ ($n_B^a$), this p-value is $$\begin{aligned}
\label{pValue2}
& & \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
p(M_C, M_O,\{r^a\}, \{n_A^a\}, \{n_B^a\}, N^\pi) = \\ \nonumber
& &
\begin{pmatrix} N_A - N^\pi + M_C - M_O \\ M_C - M_O \end{pmatrix}
\begin{pmatrix} N_B - N^\pi + M_C - M_O \\ M_C - M_O \end{pmatrix}
(M_C - M_O)! (p_A p_B)^{M_C \choose 2} \\ \nonumber
& &
\times
\prod_{a=1}^{M_C-M_O}
\sum_{m_A=r^a}^{n_A^a}
\sum_{m_B=r^a}^{n_B^a} \!\!\!
\sum_{s=r^a}^{s = \min\{m_A, m_B\}}
\begin{pmatrix} N^\pi - M_C \\
s, m_A - s, m_B - s, N^\pi - M_C - m_A - m_B + s \end{pmatrix} \\ \nonumber
& &
\times \;\; [p_A p_B]^s [p_A (1-p_B)]^{m_A - s} [(1-p_A) p_B]^{m_B - s} [(1-p_A) (1-p_B)]^{N^\pi - M_C - m_A - m_B + s}
\ .\end{aligned}$$ The contribution of self links is again omitted and giving upper bound to the p-value. The formula (\[pValue2\]) reduces to (\[pValue1\]) in the case of an isolated node (1-clique) in which case $M_C = 1, M_O
= 0$.
The p-value for the clique formed by the pairs $67.5/25$, $28/65$, $29b/42$, $23/39$ given by (\[pValue2\]) is $5\times 10^{-11}$. The p-values of finding such a clique in the PINs of the two species can be estimated similarly and they are $2\times 10^{-3}$ in KSHV and $4\times 10^{-2}$ in VZV. The difference between the p-value inferred from the aligned networks and the p-values estimated from the single–species networks indicates the significance of the evolutionary conservation of the clique.
Test of the procedure on artificial data {#artificialData}
----------------------------------------
We test the performance of the algorithm on artificially generated networks with topological characteristics similar to those of the actual KSHV and VZV networks. Since the correct alignment is known for the generated networks, we can assess the specificity and selectivity of the graph alignment in these cases.
### High similarity of graphs
We align two highly similar ER networks generated in the following way. An ER network is generated with $98$ links and $80$ nodes. A copy of this network is made and another $42$ links are placed in each network independently of each other. For $60$ nodes chosen at random in one of the networks, we assigned node similarity with their “orthologs”.
The two resulting networks thus share 98 links out of 140 and contain 60 sequence–homologous Orfs out of 80. With such a high similarity we expect the algorithm to find easily the correct alignment of the two networks, which is also what we observe (93% of the nodes are correctly aligned, none is misaligned, see the Figure \[figure\]). The quality of the alignment does not depend on the details of the algorithm schedule, the updating of all scoring parameters by the means of (\[linkScoring\]) and (\[nodeScoring\]) is possible. With increasing temperature, the number of aligned pairs increases, yet the quality of the alignment is not compromised. The optimal performance of the algorithm is reached at an intermediate temperature $T=6$.
### Moderate similarity of graphs
To test the performance of the algorithm in the regime appropriate to the actual data, we repeat the test over graphs generated to resemble the data. We generated a pair of ER graphs that out of $80$ nodes and $140$ links share $49$ links and contain $32$ nodes with related sequences, and hence their level of similarity is comparable to the estimate for the real data. For these graphs we observe a nontrivial dependence of the number of aligned and misaligned pairs on the temperature; the choice of the temperature becomes crucial at this level of network conservation. As the optimal temperature we have chosen, in a conservative scheme, the largest temperature for which the values of the score parameters remain close to their values inferred from the initial alignment of sequence homologs, see Figure \[figure2\].
We observe that with decreased similarity of the two networks, the optimal temperature at which we run the algorithm decreases to some intermediate value. Already in the case of highly similar graphs we saw that the temperature must not be too low, for otherwise the sampled region of the alignment space is too small. In the example of moderately related networks we see another phenomenon: also too high a temperature decreases the quality of the alignment. The case of high temperatures is termed the low-fidelity regime, where the link score contribution grows quickly with temperature and the node score, and hence the contribution from the sequence similarity, decreases steeply. The essence of the phenomenon is best described with a very simple example of aligning two Cayley trees[^4]. If we distribute over the trees “sequence homologs” densely, the correct alignment will be recovered, as in the case of the highly similar Erdős–Rényi graphs. However, if we distribute the sequence homologs sparsely or we do not place any homologs at all in the trees, the number of possible alignments with perfectly matching links would be huge, but none of these alignments would express the actual correlation of the graphs. There would be no statistical significance of the huge score. Updating of scores according to (\[linkScoring\]) and (\[nodeScoring\]) would result in a low or negligible node score and a high link score, and consequently in a low reward for aligning sequence related Orfs and an exaggerated reward for matching links. This is exactly the behaviour that is observed in the Figure \[figure2\]a.
To prevent the divergence of the scoring parameters we do not update the link score parameters, instead we fix them to the values inferred from the initial alignment of sequence homologs. Furthermore, being rather conservative, we keep the temperature low, below the transition value $T_D$, in order to restrict the search for alignments only within the neighbourhood of the initial alignment in the configuration space. By such a restriction, we recover some of the nodes pairs properly even at low network similarity and at the same time we keep the false positives rate low, see the Figure \[figure2\]b. At temperature $T=5$, that is slightly below the critical temperature $T_D$, we correctly recover all $32$ sequence homologs, and another $5$ pairs of Orfs without sequence similarity. In total, we recover $46\%$ of the complete network with $80$ nodes. If we concentrate on the orthologs without sequence similarity solely, the algorithm recovers at $T=5$ $10\%$ of non-sequence homologous pairs. Here we note that among non-sequence homologous pairs only $73\%$ have some topological similarity, $33\%$ share at least two links, and only $10\%$ share three or more links. The aligned pairs without sequence similarity share two or three links.
Sequences comparison {#sequencesComparison}
====================
Genome data
-----------
The sequences of the two herpesviruses (KSHV strain BC-1 and VZV Oka-parental) have been downloaded from the VOCs database [@hi-up-2000]. Further Orfs (alternative splices) have been obtained from the NCBI database [@ba-etal-2004] or the VIDA database [@al-etal-2001b] or have been provided by Peter Uetz [@ue-etal-2005].
Sequence alignment
------------------
To assess mutual sequence similarity of the Orfs in the two viral species we generate sequence alignments of each KSHV Orf with each VZV Orf. Since the open reading frames are short and the level of sequence similarity is low, care has to be taken in obtaining the optimal alignment, as detailed below.
To account for the uneven level of sequence conservation across the genome, we optimise the scoring parameters of the Needleman–Wunsch algorithm individually for each pair of Orfs [@ne-wu-1970]. We use affine gap penalties and the scoring matrices of the BLOSUM series (BLOSUM35 to BLOSUM90, [@he-he-1992]). We optimise the following parameters: the gap–opening penalty, the gap–extension penalty and the evolutionary distance encoded by the BLOSUM matrices. The code for the sequence alignment, termed *sequenceAlign* is available upon request.
### Score
We define a standard log-likelihood score of an alignment of two sequences by comparing a model based on evolutionary relation of the two sequences with a random model. The random model of independently evolved sequences depends only on the frequencies of amino-acids occurring in natural peptides. If we denote these frequencies by $p(a)$, where $a$ stands for an amino-acid residue and has $20$ possible values, we may write the probability of generating randomly a sequence $\mathbf{a}$ of length $L$ with a composition $\{a_i\}$ as $$P(\mathbf{a}) = \prod_{i = 1}^{L} p(a_i) \ .$$ The probability of generating sequences $\mathbf{a}$ and $\mathbf{b}$ under this uncorrelated model reads $$P^\prime(\lambda, \mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b}) = P(\mathbf{a}) P(\mathbf{b}) = \prod_{j = 1}^{L} p(a_j) p(b_j) \ .$$ For evolutionary related sequences, we expect a higher probability observing two equal or similar residues, which is expressed by the log-likelihood score matrices $\sigma$. Hence $$Q^\prime(\lambda, \mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b}) = \frac{1}{Z^\prime(\mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b})} \prod_{j = 1}^{L} p(a_j) p(b_j) e^{\sigma(a_j, b_j)} \ ,$$ where $Z^\prime(\mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b})$ is a normalisation constant $$Z^\prime(\mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b}) = \sum_\lambda \prod_{j = 1}^{L} p(a_j) p(b_j)e^{\sigma(a_j, b_j)} \ .$$ The construction of the scoring matrices of the BLOSUM series ascertains that the normalisation constant $Z^\prime$ equals $1$ for sequences with the residue frequencies $p(a)$ close to those inferred from current databases. This condition is also typically satisfied for all proteins with $100$ and more residues. The log-likelihood score of an alignment (without gaps) is then expressed as $$\begin{aligned}
\theta^\prime(\lambda, \mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b}) & = & \ln \frac{Q^\prime(\lambda, \mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b})}{P^\prime(\lambda, \mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b})} \\ \nonumber
& = & \sum_{j = 1}^L \sigma(a_j, b_j) - \ln Z^\prime(\mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b}) \ .\end{aligned}$$
With the proper normalisation of $Q^\prime$ by $Z^\prime$, the score $\theta^\prime$ is larger than zero whenever the two sequences $\mathbf{a}$ and $\mathbf{b}$ are more likely to evolve under the evolutionary model underlying the scoring matrices in use.
To allow gaps in the global alignment we add two more parameters to the model, the gap–opening penalty $\ln\mu$ and the gap–extension penalty $\ln\nu$ (affine gaps). The score splits into two parts: the substitutions score and the gap score: $$\begin{aligned}
\theta(\lambda, \mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b}, \mu, \nu, \sigma) & = & \ln \frac{Q(\lambda, \mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b})}{P(\lambda, \mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b})} \\
\nonumber & = & \sum_{\mathrm{aligned\;r.}\,j} \sigma(a_j, b_j)
+ \sum_{\mathrm{gaps}\,j} \left[\ln\mu + (l_j - 1) \ln\nu\right]
- \ln Z^L \ .\end{aligned}$$ Here we first sum all contributions from residue substitutions and then we sum all the gap costs. The affine gap costs increase linearly with the gap length $l_j$.
$Z^L$ is the normalisation constant of the probabilities $Q$ and it depends on the length of the alignment $L$, the two sequences, the scoring matrix in use, and the gap score parameters. Since the BLOSUM score matrices are properly normalised by construction, $Z^\prime =
1$, or $$\label{blosumNorm}
\sum_{a,b} p(a)p(b)e^{\sigma(a,b)} = 1 \ ,$$ the only contribution to $Z^L$ comes from the gaps. To calculate this contribution, we will consider the following Markov chain.
We start with the two sequences completely unaligned and we choose one option of: either *(i)* we align the two initial residues of the considered sequences (a substitution), or *(ii)* we align the initial residue of the second sequence with a gap, that is, we create a gap on the first sequence (a deletion), or *(iii)* we create a gap on the other sequence (an insertion). In this way the alignment is started and we extend it by one of the following steps: either *(i)* we align the residues that follow in the two sequences (a substitution), or *(ii)* we create the gap on the first sequence (a deletion), or *(iii)* we create a gap on the other sequence (an insertion). We repeat the steps *(i–iii)* until the last residue is aligned to a residue or to a gap. The length of the alignment $L$ is the number of the steps in the Markov chain. For this Markov chain we can calculate the normalisation constant $Z^L$ by a simple transfer matrix method. At each step $l$ there are three possibilities of the end state of the alignment: either the last step was a substitution, or a deletion or an insertion. Hence, we split $Z^l$ in three parts $Z^l = Z_s^l + Z_d^l + Z_i^l$ that correspond to the respective end-states. We may express the vector $Z^{l+1} = (Z^{l+1}_s, Z^{l+1}_d, Z^{l+1}_i)$ at step $l+1$ of the Markov chain as a function of the vector $Z^l$ at the step $l$: $$Z^{l+1} = T Z^{l},$$ where the transfer matrix $T$ reads $$T =
\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 1 & 1 \\
\mu & \nu & 0 \\
\mu & 0 & \nu
\end{pmatrix}.$$ At the beginning of the alignment process we may start with a substitution, a deletion or an insertion and hence $Z^0 = (1, 1,
1)$. The normalisation constant for an alignment of length $L$ can be readily calculated by applying the transfer matrix $L$-times on the initial vector $Z^0$ $$Z^{L} = T^L Z^{0}.$$ For long alignments the dominant contribution comes from the largest eigenvalue of the transfer matrix $\alpha$, $$\alpha = \frac{\nu + 1 + \sqrt{(\nu-1)^2 + 8\mu}}{2} \ ,$$ and it reads $$Z^L = \frac{(2\mu - \nu + 3\alpha)}{\sqrt{(\nu-1)^2 + 8\mu}} \alpha^L \ .$$ Since the logarithm of the normalisation constant $\ln Z^L = C(\mu,
\nu) + L \ln\alpha$ is extensive in the length $L$ and since $L$ is the sum of numbers of substitutions, deletions and insertions, the normalisation can be implemented as a shift of scores: $$\begin{aligned}
\theta(\lambda, \mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b}, \mu, \nu, \sigma) & = & \sum_{\mathrm{aligned\;r.}} (\sigma(a_j, b_j) - \ln \alpha) \\ \nonumber
& + & \sum_{\mathrm{gaps}} [\ln\mu - \ln \alpha + (l_j - 1) (\ln\nu - \ln \alpha)]
- C(\mu, \nu). \end{aligned}$$
The score defined by the last formula is properly normalised for any choice of scoring parameters $\mu, \nu$ and $\sigma$, whenever the substitution scoring matrix is normalised according to (\[blosumNorm\]). The normalisation is done against all alignments of length $L$, what is an approximation of the exact normalisation evaluated by Yu and Hwa, [@yu-hw-2001], who considered all possible alignments of the two sequences. However, this approximation allows to evaluate the normalisation constant explicitly (instead of the iterative formulae of [@yu-hw-2001]) and is at the same time a very good estimate for sufficiently large negative gap penalties. The normalisation allows us to search for the optimal parameters for an alignment of any two sequences $\mathbf{a}$ by maximising the score $\theta(\lambda, \mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b}, \mu, \nu, \sigma)$ over arguments: the alignment $\lambda$ and the parameters $\mu, \nu, \sigma$. This maximisation is performed iteratively by the code *sequenceAlign*.
The final score is computed by subtracting the contribution of leading and trailing gaps. All alignments which are either too short ($6$ residues and less) or contain too many gaps (a gap opening every $6^{\mathrm{th}}$ residue on average), are disregarded as insignificant. The final score is used as the measure of the sequence similarity $\theta$ which is used, in completion to interaction data, in the network alignment. For the remaining alignments we compute also the percent identity defined as the number of identities in the alignment divided by the total number of substitutions in the alignment. Knowing the optimal alignment and its score for all pairs of nucleotide sequences, we search for the reciprocally best matching Orfs in the two species, considered bona-fide *sequence homologs*.
The number of sequence homologs in the KSHV/VZV genome is 34, that is approximately $40\%$ of the Orfs of each species. The list of the sequence homologs and parameters of their alignments are given in the Table \[seqOrth\], together with the scores calculated using *clustalW* (version 1.81, default parameters [@clustalW]). For the four Orfs pairs discussed in the Results section of the main text we have estimated also p-values of the *clustalW* alignment and we present the data in the Table \[alignedPairs1\].
Here we define the p-value of the *clustalW* alignment as the probability of obtaining an alignment of two random sequences with the same or higher percent identity and with a comparable length ($\pm
10\%$) as the alignment of the real protein sequences. To generate the ensemble of random sequences ($1000$ pairs) we permute the real sequences in a random fashion. In this way we keep the lengths and base compositions of the two sequences, but we remove any sequence relation. The random pairs are afterwards aligned with *clustalW* and the p-value is estimated from the frequencies of the percent identities.
Graph alignment of VZV and KSHV
===============================
The optimal temperature for the algorithm run has been estimated from the Figure \[figure3\]. By comparison of the plot with the Figure \[figure2\] we estimate the value of the transition temperature $T_D=6$ and run the alignment algorithm with the schedule defined by $T=5$. In this way, we maximise the number of aligned pairs while aiming to keep the estimated number of wrongly aligned pairs negligible. The alignment contains $26$ node pairs out $84$ of KSHV and $76$ of VZV (approximately $33\%$).
{height="40.00000%"}
The list of pairs of Orfs that are present in the resulting alignment is shown in the Table \[alignedPairs0\] together with local scores for the pairs. The local scores give the contributions of the pair to the total node and link scores of the alignment. Comparison of the sequences of the pairs of Orfs which are discussed in the Results section of the main text are summarised in the Table \[alignedPairs1\]. The comparison of the interaction patterns of these pairs is summarised in the Table \[alignedPairs2\].
[**KSHV Orf**]{} [**VZV Orf**]{} [**node score**]{} [**link score**]{}
------------------ ----------------- -------------------- --------------------
28 65 3.50 6.30
29b 42 4.30 6.14
67.5 25 4.20 4.57
23 39 -0.49 4.47
41 60 -0.49 4.39
61 19 5.41 2.00
60 18 5.41 1.67
9 28 5.41 0.91
6 29 5.41 0.35
25 40 5.41 0.35
37 48 5.41 0.35
20 35 4.66 0.35
29a 45 4.30 0.35
43 54 5.41 0.35
70 13 5.41 0.35
8 31 5.41 0.35
7 30 5.41 0.14
44 55 5.41 0.14
19 34 5.41 0.06
56 6 5.41 0.01
53 9a 2.49 -0.08
17 33 5.41 -0.16
39 50 5.41 -0.29
26 41 5.21 -0.29
46 59 5.41 -0.29
68 26 5.41 -0.76
: [**The list of Orfs in the optimal alignment.** The aligned node pairs are ordered according to the value of the link score.]{}[]{data-label="alignedPairs0"}
[**KSHV Orf**]{} [**VZV Orf**]{} [**seq. orth.**]{} [***sequenceAlign***]{} identity (%) length score [***clustalW***]{} identity (%) length score p-value
------------------ ----------------- -------------------- -------------------------------------- -------- ------- --------------------------------- -------- ------- ---------
67.5 25 \* 20.0 80 0 18.4 76 57 0.44
28 65 \* 10.8 102 0 10.8 102 -31 0.66
23 39 — — — 17.5 240 41 0.43
41 60 — — — 11.9 160 -42 0.94
: [ Results of *sequenceAlign* and *clustalW* are shown. The p-values for the *clustalW* results are calculated from the ensemble of randomised sequences as discussed in the main text.]{}[]{data-label="alignedPairs1"}
[**KSHV Orf**]{} [**VZV Orf**]{} [**shared links**]{} [**link score**]{} [**p-value**]{}
------------------ ----------------- --- ---- ---------------------- -------------------- -------------------
67.5 25 5 12 4 4.57 $4\times 10^{-3}$
28 65 4 5 4 6.30 $1\times 10^{-3}$
23 39 4 4 3 4.47 $2\times 10^{-2}$
41 60 3 6 3 4.39 $2\times 10^{-2}$
: [ The numbers of common links and other links in the aligned subnetwork of the KSHV and VZV network are listed, together with the resulting link score. The p-values are given by equation (\[pValue1\]).]{}[]{data-label="alignedPairs2"}
Together with other characteristics of the aligned Orfs (the sequence length and the position in the genome described in the main text), we compared also the GC content of the aligned pairs. The plot in the Figure \[figure5\] shows that there is no correlation of this sequence characteristic. The fact that also very closely related herpesviral Orfs may have very different GC contents has been observed already by Vlček *et al.* in [@vl-etal-1995].
Conservation of the network–aligned Orfs pairs at the sequence level
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The pairwise sequence comparison described in Section \[sequencesComparison\] have not yielded a significant sequence similarity for $2$ node pairs aligned solely due to their interaction similarity.
To further test the possibility of detection of sequence homology homology we have searched for multiple sequence alignments of the protein families to which these Orfs belong. We have extracted the respective families from the VOCs database [@hi-up-2000], and compared them using *DIALIGN* [@dialign], *Parallel PRRN* [@pprrn], *MUSCLE* [@muscle], *T-COFFEE* [@t-coffee], *PSALIGN* [@psalign], *SAM-T99* [@sam-t99], and *MSA* [@msa].
For each pair KSHV 67.5/VZV 25, 28/65, 23/39, 41/60 we have selected from the VOCs database a representative subset of the herpesviral proteins in the same family (at least ten or all proteins) and compared these families using the multiple alignment searching tools. While for the pair 67.5/25 we have found very weak alignment[^5] of the corresponding families, for the other three pairs we have detected no sequence similarity. This observation further shows the extend of the evolutionary divergence for the pairs of Orfs.
Returning back to the pairwise alignment we have generated the dot plots for the pairs listed in the Table \[seqOrth\]. Here we observe a very clear pattern: while for the Orfs pairs with a high similarity the dot plot is dominated by a single diagonal, with increasing divergence this diagonal disappears among short diagonal lines that correspond to random alignments, see Figure \[dotPlots\]. The network–aligned pairs show the dot–plot pattern of an intermediate quality.
![[. With decreasing level of sequence conservation the dominant diagonal in the dot plot disappears among traces of random alignments. From top–left to bottom–right: Orfs KSHV 70/VZV 13, an almost perfect match; Orfs 35/20, a typical match of sequence homologs, Orfs 67.5/25, the pair aligned due to sequence and network conservation; Orfs 28/65, 41/60 and 23/39, the pairs aligned dominantly or only because of interaction conservation; Orfs 72/7, spurious sequence homologs not aligned by the network alignment; Orf 72/permuted Orf 72, comparison with a random sequence. The sliding window of size 30 has been used for the generation of the dot plots.]{}[]{data-label="dotPlots"}](Figures/s-figure6.jpg){width="70.00000%"}
Query= KSHV-BC1-Orf67.5 Length= 80
Sbjct= VZV-Oka_p-Orf25 Length= 156
Score= 0.2433
logMu -6.798, logNu 0.006, logAlpha 0.049,
Matrix: blosum50
Q: EYAS--------------------------------------------------------
S: YESENASEHHPELEDVFSENTGDSNPSMGSSDSTRSISGMRARDLITDTDVNLLNIDALE
+
Q: ----------------DQLLPRDMQILFPTIYCRLNAINYCQYLKTFLVQR--------A
S: SKYFPADSTFTLSVWFENLIPPEIEAILPTTDAQLNYISFTSRLASVLKHKESNDSEKSA
++L+P +++ ++PT +LN I++ + L + L ++ A
Q: QPAACDHTLVLESKVDTVRQVLRKIVSTDAVFSEA
S: YVVPCEHSASVTRRRERFAGVMAKFLDLHEILKDA
C+H+ + + + V+ K + ++ +A
[b) [*clustalW*]{}]{}
Sequence 1: KSHV-BC1-Orf67.5 80 aa
Sequence 2: VZV-Oka_p-Orf25 156 aa
Alignment Score 57
CLUSTAL W (1.81) multiple sequence alignment
KSHV-BC1-Orf67.5 --------MEYAS----DQLLPRDMQILFPTIYCRLNAINYCQYLKTFLVQRAQP-----
VZV-Oka_p-Orf25 ESKYFPADSTFTLSVWFENLIPPEIEAILPTTDAQLNYISFTSRLASVLKHKESNDSEKS
++ ++L+P +++ ++PT ++LN I++ + L ++L ++ +
KSHV-BC1-Orf67.5 ---AACDHTLVLESKVDTVRQVLRKIVSTDAVFSEARARP
VZV-Oka_p-Orf25 AYVVPCEHSASVTRRRERFAGVMAKFLDLHEILKDA----
++C+H+ + + + + V+ K+++ + ++++A
Sequence 1: KSHV-BC1-028 102 aa
Sequence 2: VZV-Oka_p-065 102 aa
Alignment Score -31
CLUSTAL W (1.81) multiple sequence alignment
KSHV-BC1-028 MSMTSPSPVTGGMVDGSVLVRMATKPPVIGLITVLFLLVIGACVYCCIRVFLAARLWRAT
VZV-Oka_p-065 MAGQNTMEGEAVALLMEAVVTPRAQPNNTTITAIQPSRSAEKCYYSDSENETADEFLRRI
M+ ++ + + +++V ++P + ++ C Y+ + A ++ R
KSHV-BC1-028 PLGRATVAYQVLRTLGPQAGSHAPPTVGIATQEPYRTIYMPD
VZV-Oka_p-065 GKYQHKIYHRKKFCYITLIIVFVFAMTGAAFALGYITSQFVG
+ ++ ++ + ++ + +G A Y T + +
Sequence 1: KSHV-BC1-023 404 aa
Sequence 2: VZV-Oka_p-039 240 aa
Alignment Score 41
CLUSTAL W (1.81) multiple sequence alignment
KSHV-BC1-023 MLRVPDVKASLVEGAARLSTGERVFHVLTSPAVAAMVGVSNPEVPMPLLFEKFGTPDSST
VZV-Oka_p-039 ----------------------------------------------------------MN
+
KSHV-BC1-023 LPLYAARHPELSLLRIMLSPHPYALRSHLCVGEETASLGVYLHSKPVVRGHEFEDTQILP
VZV-Oka_p-039 PPQARVSEQTKDLLSVMVNQHP--------------------------------------
P + + +LL +M++ HP
KSHV-BC1-023 ECRLAITSDQSYTNFKIIDLPAGCRRVPIHAANKRVVIDEAANRIKVFDPESPLPRHPIT
VZV-Oka_p-039 --------------------------------------EEDAKVCKSSDNSPLYNTMVML
+E A+ K D ++ +
KSHV-BC1-023 PRAGQTRSILKHNIAQVCERDIVSLNTDNEAASMFYMIGLRRPRLGESPVCDFNTVTIME
VZV-Oka_p-039 SYGGDTDLLLSS----ACTRTSTVNRSAFTQHSVFYIIST----VLIQPICCIFFFFYYK
+ +G+T +L+ +C R + ++ S+FY+I+ + +P+C + + +
KSHV-BC1-023 RANNSITFLPKLKLNRLQHLFLKHVLLRSMGLENIVSCFSSLYGAELAPAKTHEREFFGA
VZV-Oka_p-039 ATRCMLLFTAGLLLTILHHFRLIIMLL----------CVYRNIRSDLLPLSTSQQLLLGI
++ + F + L L+ L+H+ L +LL C+ ++L P +T ++ ++G
KSHV-BC1-023 LLERLKRRVEDAVFCLNTIEDFPFREPIRQPPDCSKVLIEAMEKYFMMCSPKDRQSAAWL
VZV-Oka_p-039 IVVTRT-----MLFCITAYYTLFIDTRVFFLITGHLQSEVIFPDSVSKILPVSWGPSPAV
++ + +FC+++ + + + + + + P + +++ +
KSHV-BC1-023 GAGVVELICDGNPLSEVLGFLAKYMPIQKECTGNLLKIYALLTV
VZV-Oka_p-039 LLVMAAVIYAMDCLVDTVSFIG-----PRVWVRVMLKTSISF--
++ +I + L ++++F++ + + +LK +
Sequence 1: KSHV-BC1-041 205 aa
Sequence 2: VZV-Oka_p-060 160 aa
Alignment Score -42
CLUSTAL W (1.81) multiple sequence alignment
KSHV-BC1-041 MAGFTLKGGTSGDLVFSSHANLLFSTSMGYFLHAGSPRSTAGTGGEPNPRHITGPDTEGN
VZV-Oka_p-060 ---------MASHKWLLQMIVFLKTITIAYCLHLQDDTPLFFGAKPLSDVSLIITEPCVS
+++ + + +L + +++Y LH + + + + + +++ +
KSHV-BC1-041 GEHRNSPNLCGFVTWLQSLTTCIERALNMPPDTSWLQLIEEVIPLYFHRRRQTSFWLIPL
VZV-Oka_p-060 SVYEAWDYAAPPVSNLSEALSGIVVKTKCP--------VPEVILWFKDK--QMAYWTNPY
+ ++ + V+ L++ + I + P + EVI + ++ Q ++W P
KSHV-BC1-041 SHCEGIPVCPPLPFDCLAPRLFIVTKSGPMCYRAGFSLPVDVNYLFYLEQTLKAVRQVSP
VZV-Oka_p-060 VTLKGLTQSVGEEHKSGDIRDALLDALSGVWVDS------------------------TP
+G++ + +++ R ++ + + + +P
KSHV-BC1-041 QEHNPQDAKEMTLQLEAWTRLLSLF
VZV-Oka_p-060 SSTNIPENGCVWGADRLFQRVCQ--
++ N + + + + R+ +
Conserved links typically connect alike Orfs
--------------------------------------------
To examine the relationship between function of the proteins and the conservation of links among them, we analyse the likeliness of the conservation of the links among the proteins with similar functions and of the conservation of the links between the proteins with dissimilar functions.
First we test if the conserved links are more likely to connect alike proteins. To do so, we group the Orfs to two functional classes: the protein belongs either to the class of ‘structure–related’ proteins (classes: capsid/core protein, membrane/glycoprotein, virion protein, virion assembly) or to the class of ‘information–processing’ proteins (DNA replication, gene expression regulation, nucleotide repair/metabolism, host–virus interaction). We calculate the frequencies $p(f_i,f_j)$ of functional annotations $f_i$, $f_j$ of adjacent Orfs $i$ and $j$ in the subgraph containing all sequence homologs (resp. all network–aligned Orfs), $$p(g, h) = \frac{\sum_{links} \delta(f_i = g) \delta(f_j = h)}
{\sum_{links} 1}.$$ We evaluate this sum separately for all the links in the subgraph ($p_A$), the conserved links only ($p_M$) and for the nonconserved (mismatching) links in the subgraph ($p_{MM}$).
Then we calculate the mutual information as the measure of the influence of the functional annotation of the adjacent Orfs on the link state, $$I = \sum_g \sum_h p(g,h) \ln \frac{p(g,h)}{p(g)p(h)},$$ where $p(g)$ is the marginal $p(g) = \sum_h p(g,h)$. Keeping the subscripts we find: $I_A = 0.0014$ for the subgraph of sequence homologs ($0.0092$ for the alignment subgraph), $I_M = 0.0743$ ($0.1178$), and $I_{MM} = 1\times 10^{-6}$ ($0.0001$). Clearly, the largest mutual information of functional annotation of adjacent Orfs is among nodes connected by matching links (by a factor of 100 or more). We have evaluated also the frequency tables for the complete protein interaction networks, $p_K$ and $p_V$. Not surprisingly, the mutual information is small for these graphs $I_K = 0.0030$, and $I_V = 0.0052$.
To estimate the p-value of such a mutual information we have reshuffled the positions of the conserved links randomly and we have evaluated the mutual information $I_M$ for such randomised graphs. The probability of finding equal or better mutual information $I_M$ in an ensemble of $10^5$ graphs generated in this way has been taken as the p-value. The estimates are $0.12$ for the subgraph of sequence homologs and $0.05$ for the alignment subgraph.
Secondly, we test if the links between similar proteins are more likely to be conserved. Taking the subgraph of the sequence homologs as the basis of our analysis, we create the matrix $n_F(a,b)$ defined in the following way: $n_F(0,0)$ is the number of pairs of the alike Orfs between which there is a link in neither species; $n_F(1,0)$ is the number of the pairs of the alike Orfs that are connected by a link in KSHV solely; $n_F(0,1)$ the same for VZV; and $n_F(1,1)$ is the number of conserved links between alike Orfs. We create the second matrix $n_D$ defined similarly for the pairs of Orfs with unlike functional annotation.
Then we define the conservation ratio $p_F$ as the ratio of the number of conserved links and the total number of links $$c_F = n_F(1,1) / ( n_F(0,1) + n_F(1,0) + n_F(1,1) ).$$ In the same way we define $c_D$ for the links between unlike Orfs.
A rough estimate of the odds in the link conservation can be expressed as the ratio of the two conservation ratios $$C_F = c_F / c_D.$$ Its value is $1.62$, that is the links between alike Orfs are $62\%$ more likely to be conserved than the links between unlike Orfs ($c_F =
0.15$, $c_D = 0.09$). The p-value evaluated over the same graph with a randomised annotation list is $0.47$.
More refined estimate of the odds which takes in consideration also the link statistics of the two networks uses mutual information, $I_F$ and $I_D$. The mutual information expresses the level of correlation of the presence of the link in the two networks. If we normalise the frequencies $n_F$, $p_F(a,b) = n_F(a,b) / \sum_{c,d} n_F(c,d)$, we may write the mutual information as $$I_F = \sum_{a,b} p_F(a,b) \ln \frac{p_F(a,b)}{p_F^A(a)p_F^B(b)},$$ where the marginals are defined as $p_F^A(a) = \sum_b p_F(a,b)$ and $p_F^B(a) = \sum_a p_F(a,b)$. In the same way we define the mutual information $I_D$ for the unlike Orfs pairs. For the subgraph of the sequence homologs the mutual information reads $I_F = 0.049$, $I_D =
0.005$. Defining the final information odds, $D_F = I_F / I_D$, we get $D_F = 9.58$ with the p-value 0.13 (the same test as for $C_F$).
Uetz P, Dong Y-A, Zeretzke C, Atzler C, Baiker A, Berger B, Rajagopala SV, Roupelieva M, Rose D, Fossum E, Haas J (2006) Herpesviral protein networks and their interaction with the human proteome. [*Science*]{} [**311**]{}: 239–242.
Mar Albà M, Lee D, Pearl FMG, Shepherd AJ, Martin N, Orengo CA, and Kellam P (2001) VIDA: a virus database system for the organisation of virus genome open reading frames. [*Nuleic Acids Research*]{} [**29(1)**]{}: 133–136.
Hiscock D, Upton C (2000) Viral Genome Database: A tool for storing and analyzing genes and proteins from complete viral genomes. [*Bioinformatics*]{} [**16**]{}: 484–485.
Martello S and Toth P (1987) Linear assignment problems. [*Annals of Discrete Math.*]{} [**31**]{}: 259–282.
Kirkpatrick S and Gelatt CD and Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by Simulated Annealing. [*Science*]{} [**Vol 220 No 4598**]{}: 671–680.
Meier JP, Kolář M, Mustonen V, Lässig M, and Berg J (2007) [*R: GraphAlignment Package Manual*]{} *http://XXX.XXX.XXX/GraphAlignment* Viterbi AJ (1967) Error bounds for conventional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm. [*IEEE Transactions on Information Theory*]{} [**13(2)**]{}: 260–269.
Bao Y, Federhen S, Leipe D, Pham V, Resenchuk S, Rozanov M, Tatusov R, and Tatusova T (2004) National Center for Biotechnology Information Viral Genomes Project. [*J Virol.*]{} [**78(14)**]{}: 7291–7298.
Needleman SB, Wunsch CD (1970) A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins [*J. Mol. Biol.*]{}, [**48**]{}, 443-453.
Henikoff S and Henikoff JG (1992) Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks [*Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA*]{}, [**89**]{}, 10915-10919.
Yu Y-K and Hwa T, (2001) Statistical significance of probabilistic sequence alignment and related local Hidden Markov Models [*Journal of Computational Biology*]{}, [**Vol. 8, Num. 3**]{}, 249-282.
Thompson JD, Higgins DG and Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. [*Nucleic Acids Research*]{} [**22**]{}: 4673–4680.
Vlček Č, Beneš V, Lu Z, Kutish GF, Pačes V, Rock D, Letchworth GJ and Schwyzer M, (1995) Nucleotide sequence analysis of a 30-kb region of the bovine herpesvirus 1 genome which exhibits a colinear gene arrangement with the UL21 to UL4 genes of herpes simplex virus [*Virology*]{} [**210 (1)**]{}: 100–108.
Morgenstern B (2004) DIALIGN: Multiple DNA and protein sequence alignment at BiBiServ. [*Nucleic Acids Research*]{} [**32**]{}: W33–W36.
Gotoh O (1996) Significant improvement in accuracy of multiple protein sequence alignments by iterative refinement as assessed by reference to structural alignments. [*J. Mol. Biol.*]{} [**264**]{}: 823–838.
Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. [*Nucleic Acids Research*]{} [**32(5)**]{}: 1792–97.
Notredame C, Higgins D, Heringa J (2000) T-Coffee: A novel method for multiple sequence alignments. [*Journal of Molecular Biology*]{} [**302**]{}: 205–217.
Sze S-H, Lu Y, and Yang Q (2006) A polynomial time solvable formulation of multiple sequence alignment. [*Journal of Computational Biology*]{} [**13**]{}: 309–319.
Karplus K, Barrett C, and Hughey R (1998) Hidden Markov Models for detecting remote protein homologies. [*Bioinformatics*]{} [**14(10)**]{}: 846–856.
Lipman D, Altschul S, and Kececioglu J (1989) A Tool for Multiple Sequence Alignment [*Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA*]{} [**86**]{}: 4412–4415.
[^1]: VZV: varicella-zoster virus, KSHV: Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus, VOCs: viral orthologous clusters [@a-hi-up-2000], Orf: open reading frame.
[^2]: The experimental set-up allows orientation of the links by directing the links from the prey to the bait of the yeast–two–hybrid assay. In principle, one can use the resulting directed network for alignment. However, in that case the scoring matrix of the link score would has $6$ independent terms, as compared to $3$ for the undirected network, and the available data are not robust enough to infer their values.
[^3]: In the following text these abbreviations are used: ER: Erdős–Rényi (randomly generated); KSHV: Kaposi’s sarcoma associated herpesvirus; Orf: open reading frame; PIN: protein interaction network; VIDA: VIDA virus database [@al-etal-2001b]; VOCs: Viral Orthologous Clusters [@hi-up-2000]; VZV: varicella–zoster virus.
[^4]: The Cayley tree is a regular graph without loops in which every node has the same degree.
[^5]: T-Coffee alignment has two stretches of more than 20 aa with $CORE > 3$ (T-Coffee 5.05 EMBL-EBI, default configuration).
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
author:
- Leonhard Euler
title: 'An algebraic problem of finding four numbers given the products of each of the numbers with the sum of the other three[^1]'
---
If the four numbers which are to be found are put $v,z,y,z$, the following four equations are obtained $$\begin{aligned}
v(x+y+z)&=&a,\\
x(v+y+z)&=&b,\\
y(v+x+z)&=&c,\\
z(v+x+y)&=&d.\end{aligned}$$
By the usual rules, three unknowns can be successively eliminated from these equations and the fourth can then be solved for. But indeed, there is no reason why we should favor any one of these unknowns over the others as the one to be solved for. It is appropriate that none of them be determined by the final equation, and instead that a new unknown be introduced that has the same relation with them all and from which the unknowns can be defined. Thus to this end let us take the sum of the numbers to be found $$v+x+y+z=2t$$ and then the above equations will turn into these $$\begin{aligned}
v(2t-v)=a=2tv-v^2,&\textrm{whence}&v=t-\surd(tt-a),\\
x(2t-x)=b=2tx-x^2,&&x=t-\surd(tt-b),\\
y(2t-y)=c=2ty-y^2,&&y=t-\surd(tt-c),\\
z(2t-z)=d=2tz-z^2,&&z=t-\surd(tt-d).\end{aligned}$$ Therefore we have now produced a solution to the extent that from the single quantity $t$ we can readily determine all the four numbers that are sought; hence what remains is for us to investigate this quantity $t$, and by substituting the values in terms of $t$ just found for $v,x,y,z$ into the equation $$v+x+y+z=2t,$$ $t$ will satisfy $$4t-\surd(tt-a)-\surd(tt-b)-\surd(tt-c)-\surd(tt-d)=2t,$$ from which follows the equation $$2t=\surd(tt-a)+\surd(tt-b)+\surd(tt-c)+\surd(tt-d),$$ which can indeed be made rational by the method of Newton,[^2] but this would be very cumbersome. Therefore we seek to resolve this equation in another way.
Let us put $$\begin{aligned}
\surd(tt-a)=p,&\textrm{and}&v=t-p,\\
\surd(tt-b)=q,&&x=t-q,\\
\surd(tt-c)=r,&&y=t-r,\\
\surd(tt-d)=s,&&z=t-s\end{aligned}$$ and it will be $$p+q+r+s=2t.$$ Because of the irrationals $p,q,r,s$, this equation should to be transformed into another, in which only even powers of the letters occur. Then by doing the substitution for the letters $p,q,r,s$, a rational equation will be formed from which the value of the unknown $t$ may be defined.
To this end let us form the equation $$X^4-AX^3+BX^2-CX+D=0,$$ whose four roots are the given quantities $a,b,c,d$. Therefore by the nature of equations it will be $$\begin{aligned}
A&=&a+b+c+d,\\
B&=&ab+ac+ad+bc+bd+cd,\\
C&=&abc+abd+acd+bcd,\\
D&=&abcd.\end{aligned}$$ One may then put $$Y=tt-X \qquad \textrm{or} \qquad X=-Y+tt;$$ by doing this substitution we shall have the equation $$\begin{array}{rrrrr}
Y^4&-4ttY^3&+6t^4Y^2&-4t^6Y&+t^8\\
&+AY^3&-3AttY^2&+3At^4Y&-At^6\\
&&+BY^2&-2BttY&+Bt^4\\
&&&+CY&-Ctt\\
&&&&+D
\end{array}
\Bigg\}
=0.$$ The four roots of this equation of $Y$ will be $$tt-a,\quad tt-b,\quad tt-c,\quad tt-d.$$ For this equation let us write for brevity $$Y^4-PY^3+QY^2-RY+S=0,$$ so that $$\begin{aligned}
P&=&4tt-A,\\
Q&=&6t^4-3Att+B,\\
R&=&4t^6-3At^4+2Btt-C,\\
S&=&t^8-At^6+Bt^4-Ctt+D.\end{aligned}$$ Then let $$Y=Z^2 \qquad \textrm{or} \qquad Z=\pm \surd Y;$$ we will have $$Z^8-PZ^6+QZ^4-RZ^2+S=0$$ and the the eight roots of this equation will be the following $$\begin{array}{ll}
+\surd(tt-a)=+p,&-\surd(tt-a)=-p,\\
+\surd(tt-b)=+q,&-\surd(tt-b)=-q,\\
+\surd(tt-c)=+r,&-\surd(tt-c)=-r,\\
+\surd(tt-d)=+s,&-\surd(tt-d)=-s.
\end{array}$$ One may resolve this equation of eight dimensions into two biquadratics, the roots of the first of which are $+p,+q,+r,+s$, the second $-p,-q,-r,-s$; let them be[^3] $$\begin{aligned}
Z^4-\alpha Z^3 +\beta Z^2 -\gamma Z+\delta&=&0,\\
Z^4+\alpha Z^3+\beta Z^2 +\gamma Z+\delta&=&0, \end{aligned}$$ in which by the nature of equations it will be $$\begin{aligned}
\alpha&=&p+q+r+s,\\
\beta&=&pq+pr+ps+qr+qs+rs,\\
\gamma&=&pqr+pqs+prs+qrs,\\
\delta&=&pqrs.\end{aligned}$$ Because the product of these two biquadratic equations must be equal to the equation of eight dimensions, it will be[^4] $$\begin{aligned}
P&=&\alpha^2-2\beta,\\
Q&=&\beta^2-2\alpha \gamma +2\delta,\\
R&=&\gamma^2-2\beta \delta,\\
S&=&\delta^2.\end{aligned}$$ And since $\alpha=p+q+r+s$, it will be $$\alpha=2t$$ and hence $\alpha^2=4tt$, whence it will be $$\alpha^2-2\beta=4tt-2\beta=P=4tt-A,$$ therefore $$\beta=\frac{A}{2}.$$ The second equation $Q=\beta^2-2\alpha\gamma+2\delta$ will give $$6t^4-3Att+B=\frac{A^2}{4}-4\gamma t+2\delta$$ or $$\delta=3t^4-\frac{3}{2}Att+2\gamma t-\frac{A^2}{8}+\frac{B}{2}.$$ Indeed the third equation $R=\gamma^2-2\beta\delta$ will yield $$4t^6-3At^4+2Btt-C=\gamma^2-A\delta$$ or $$A\delta=-4t^6+3At^4-2Btt+C+\gamma^2;$$ this with the previous gives $$\begin{array}{rrrr}
4t^6&-\frac{3}{2}A^2tt&+2A\gamma t&-\frac{A^3}{8}\\
&+2Btt&&+\frac{AB}{2}\\
&&&-C
\end{array}
\bigg\}=\gamma^2.$$ By taking the square root we will obtain[^5] $$\gamma=At \pm \surd\Big(4t^6+(2B-\frac{1}{2}A^2)tt-\frac{1}{8}A^3+\frac{1}{2}AB-C\Big)$$ and thence[^6] $$\delta=3t^4+\frac{1}{2}Att-\frac{1}{8}A^2+\frac{1}{2}B \pm
2t \surd\Big( 4t^6+(2B-\frac{1}{2}A^2)tt-\frac{1}{8}A^3+\frac{1}{2}AB-C \Big),$$ whose square is $$\begin{array}{lllll}
25t^8&+3At^6&-\frac{5}{2}A^2t^4&-\frac{5}{8}A^3tt&+\frac{1}{64}A^4\\
&&+11B&+\frac{5}{2}AB&-\frac{1}{8}A^2B\\
&&&-4C&+\frac{1}{4}B^2
\end{array}$$ $$\pm (12t^5+2At^3-\frac{1}{2}A^2t+2Bt)\surd\Big(4t^6+(2B-\frac{1}{2}A^2)tt
-\frac{1}{8}A^3+\frac{1}{2}AB-C\Big),$$ should be equal to $S$, that is, to the expression $t^8-At^6+Bt^4-Ctt+D$, from which this equation follows $$\begin{array}{lllll}
24t^8&+4At^6&-\frac{5}{2}A^2t^4&-\frac{5}{8}A^3tt&+\frac{1}{64}A^4\\
&&+10B&+\frac{5}{2}AB&-\frac{1}{8}A^2B\\
&&&-3C&+\frac{1}{4}B^2\\
&&&&-D
\end{array}$$ $$+(12t^5+2At^3-\frac{1}{2}A^2t+2Bt)\surd\Big( 4t^6+(2B-\frac{1}{2}A^2)tt
-\frac{1}{8}A^3+\frac{1}{2}AB-C \Big)=0,$$ which rationalized gives[^7] $$\begin{array}{lllll}
+3A^4t^8&+\frac{5}{4}A^5t^6&+\frac{3}{16}A^6t^4&+\frac{3}{256}A^7tt&+\frac{1}{4096}A^8\\
-12A^2B&-8A^3B&-\frac{27}{16}A^4B&-\frac{9}{64}A^5B&-\frac{1}{256}A^6B\\
+24AC&+7A^2C&+\frac{7}{4}A^3C&+\frac{5}{32}A^4C&+\frac{3}{128}A^4B^2\\
-48D&+12AB^2&+\frac{9}{2}A^2B^2&+\frac{9}{16}A^3B^2&-\frac{1}{32}A^4D\\
&-8AD&+5A^2D&+\frac{5}{4}A^3D&-\frac{1}{16}A^2B^3\\
&-12BC&-7ABC&-\frac{5}{4}A^2BC&+\frac{1}{4}A^2BD\\
&&-3B^3&-\frac{3}{4}AB^3&+\frac{1}{16}B^4\\
&&-20BD&-5ABD&-\frac{1}{2}B^2D\\
&&+9C^2&+\frac{5}{2}B^2C&+D^2\\
&&&+6CD
\end{array}=0.$$ For brevity let $E=\frac{1}{4}A^2-B$ and $u=2t$; it will be $$\begin{array}{lllll}
+3A^2Eu^8&+2A^3Eu^6&+9A^2E^2u^4&+12AE^3uu&+4E^4\\
+6AC&+4A^2C&+28ACE&+80ADE&-32DE^2\\
-12D&+12AE^2&+80DE&+96CD&+64D^2\\
&-8AD&+36C^2&+40CE^2\\
&+12CE&+12E^3
\end{array}=0.$$ This equation then has four positive roots and four negative roots, equal except for sign, and thus the equation can be solved as a biquadratic equation. Moreover, the quantities $A,B,C,D$ and $E$ are known quantities determined from the given $a,b,c,d$, since, of course, $$\begin{aligned}
A&=&a+b+c+d,\\
B&=&ab+ac+ad+bc+bd+cd,\\
C&=&abc+abd+acd+bcd,\\
D&=&abcd\end{aligned}$$ and also $$E=\frac{1}{4}A^2-B.$$ For each of the values found for $u$, the sought quantities will be $$\begin{aligned}
v&=&\frac{u-\surd(uu-4a)}{2},\\
x&=&\frac{u-\surd(uu-4b)}{2},\\
y&=&\frac{u-\surd(uu-4c)}{2},\\
z&=&\frac{u-\surd(uu-4d)}{2}.\end{aligned}$$
[Another solution]{}
The problem can also be solved in this way. From the original equations we have $$\begin{array}{lll}
a-b=(v-x)(y+z),&&b-c=(x-y)(v+z),\\
a-c=(v-y)(x+z),&&b-d=(x-z)(v+y),\\
a-d=(v-z)(x+y),&&c-d=(y-z)(v+x).
\end{array}$$ From the first and last equations we obtain $$v-x=\frac{a-b}{y+z},\qquad v+x=\frac{c-d}{y-z}.$$ Let $$\frac{a+b-c-d}{2}=h;$$ it will be[^8] $$h=vx-yz$$ and by making $$\frac{a+b+c+d}{2}=k$$ it will be[^9] $$k=vx+vy+vz+xy+xv+yz,$$ and therefore $$k-h=2yz+(v+x)(y+z)$$ or $$k-h=2yz+\frac{(c-d)(y+z)}{y-z}=c+d,$$ therefore $$2yz=\frac{2dy-2cz}{y-z} \qquad \textrm{or} \qquad yyz-yzz=dy-cz.$$ By setting $yz=t$ this equation turns into $$(d-t)y-(c-t)z=0.$$ Now put $$dy-cz=u$$ and it will be $$y=\frac{(c-t)u}{(c-d)t} \qquad \textrm{and} \qquad
z=\frac{(d-t)u}{(c-d)t}.$$ These values substituted into $t=yz$ yield $$t=\frac{(c-t)(d-t)uu}{(c-d)^2tt},$$ from which follows $$u=\frac{(c-d)t\surd t}{\surd(cd-(c+d)t+tt)},$$ and when this is substituted into the values found above for $y$ and $z$ we shall have $$\textrm{I.}\qquad y=\frac{(c-t)\surd t}{\surd(cd-(c+d)t+tt)}$$ and $$\textrm{II.}\qquad z=\frac{(d-t)\surd t}{\surd(cd-(c+d)t+tt)}.$$ Adding and subtracting, $$y+z=\frac{(c+d-2t)\surd t}{\surd(cd-(c+d)t+tt)}
\qquad \textrm{and} \qquad y-z=\frac{(c-d)\surd t}{\surd(cd-(c+d)t+tt)}.$$ One then deduces that[^10] $$v+x=\frac{\surd(cd-(c+d)t+tt)}{\surd t}
\qquad \textrm{and} \qquad
v-x=\frac{(a-b)\surd(cd-(c+d)t+tt)}{(c+d-2t)\surd t},$$ whence, again adding and subtracting and putting for the sake of brevity $$b+c+d-a=m \qquad \textrm{and} \qquad a+c+d-b=n,$$ the following values are produced for $v$ and $x$[^11] $$\textrm{III.}\qquad v=\frac{(n-2t)\surd(cd-(c+d)t+tt)}{2(c+d-2t)\surd t}$$ and $$\textrm{IV.}\qquad x=\frac{(m-2t)\surd(cd-(c+d)t+tt)}{2(c+d-2t)\surd t}.$$
But since we have found above that $h=vx-yz$, substituting for $v,x,y,z$ their values and expanding yields the following equation of four dimensions for determining the value of $t$ $$4t(h+t)(c+d-2t)^2=(m-2t)(n-2t)(c-t)(d-t).$$
[^1]: Originally published as [*Problema algebraicum de inveniendis quatuor numeris ex datis totidem productis uniuscuiusque horum numerorum in summas trium reliquorum*]{}, Opera Postuma **1** (1862), 282–287. E808 in the Enestr[ö]{}m index. Translated from the Latin by Jordan Bell, Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Email: [email protected]
[^2]: Translator: The editors of the [*Opera omnia*]{} refer to p. 66 of the 1707 edition of Newton’s [*Arithmetica universalis*]{}.
[^3]: Translator: If $\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\delta$ are defined by $(Z-p)(Z-q)(Z-r)(Z-s)=Z^4-\alpha Z^3+\beta Z^2-\gamma Z+\delta$, then $(Z+p)(Z+q)(Z+r)(Z+s)=Z^4+\alpha Z^3+\beta Z^2+\gamma Z+\delta$.
[^4]: Translator: Multiplying together the two biquadratics and comparing the coefficients of powers of $Z$ in this product and in $Z^8-PZ^6+QZ^4-RZ^2+S=0$.
[^5]: Translator: Applying the quadratic formula to the above equation in terms of $\gamma$.
[^6]: Translator: Using the equation $\delta=3t^4-\frac{3}{2}Att+2\gamma t-\frac{A^2}{8}+\frac{B}{2}$.
[^7]: Translator: Move the surd term to the right hand side of the equation, then square both sides, then compare coefficients of $t$. I’ve checked this but I don’t see a clean way to do it.
[^8]: Translator: From the definitions of $a,b,c,d$ given at the beginning of the paper.
[^9]: Translator: From the definitions of $a,b,c,d$.
[^10]: Translator: Since $v-x=\frac{a-b}{y+z}$ and $v+x=\frac{c-d}{y-z}$.
[^11]: Translator: By adding and subtracting the equations for $v+x$ and $v-x$.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'A two-dimensional system of soft particles interacting via a two-length-scale potential is studied. Density functional theory and Brownian dynamics simulations reveal a fluid phase and two crystalline phases with different lattice spacing. Of these the larger lattice spacing phase can form an exotic [periodic state with a fraction of highly mobile particles: a crystal liquid]{}. Near the transition between this phase and the smaller lattice spacing phase, quasicrystalline structures may be created by a competition between linear instability at one scale and nonlinear selection of the other.'
author:
- 'A.J. Archer$^\ast$, A.M. Rucklidge$^\dag$ and E. Knobloch$^\#$'
title: '[Quasicrystalline order and a crystal-liquid state in a soft-core fluid]{}'
---
Crystals are ordered arrangements of atoms or molecules with rotation and translation symmetries. Quasicrystals (QCs), discovered in 1982 [@Shechtman1984a], lack the lattice symmetries of crystals and yet have discrete Fourier spectra. QCs have been found not only in metals but also in colloidal systems [@DentonLowen98; @Talapin2009], mesoporous silica [@Xiao2012] and soft-matter systems [@Dotera2011]. The latter can form micelles [@Zeng2004; @Fischer2011], e.g., from dendrimers or block copolymers, comprising a hydrophobic polymer core surrounded by a corona of flexible hydrophilic polymer chains. Theoretical approaches to investigating the stability of metallic or micellar QCs often involve minimising an appropriate energy, but the principle underlying their stability is not known [@KeGl07; @HBS06].
Patterns with quasicrystalline structure, or quasipatterns, were discovered in Faraday wave experiments in the 1990s; two mechanisms for stabilizing these were identified [@Muller1994]. The first, relevant to experiments in Ref. [@Christiansen1992], involves one length scale and may lead to a stable quasipattern [@Malomed1989]. The second, involving coupling between an unstable scale and weakly damped (or weakly excited) waves with a different length scale, is relevant to the experiments in Refs. [@Edwards1993; @Kudrolli1998; @Arbell2002; @Ding2006], and was explored in [@Zhang1997; @Lifshitz1997; @Topaz2004; @Skeldon2007; @Rucklidge2009; @Rucklidge2012]. This mechanism can also operate for soft-matter QCs [@Lifshitz2007a; @Engel2007a; @Barkan2011; @RGZ12]. Here, we observe a dynamic mechanism for forming QCs involving two length scales that is qualitatively different: the system first forms a small length scale crystal. Only when this phase is almost fully formed (i.e., the dynamics is far into the nonlinear regime) does the longer length scale start to appear, leading to the formation of QCs. This process occurs in a region of the phase diagram where the linear growth of density fluctuations in a quenched uniform fluid selects the shorter scale but nonlinear stability favors a longer scale.
The effective coarse-grained interaction potentials between the centres of mass of polymers, dendrimers or other such macromolecules, are soft. By this we mean that they are finite for all separation distances $r$, because the centre of mass of such soft objects does not necessarily coincide with any individual monomer. The soft effective pair potential between such particles can be approximated as $V(r)=\epsilon e^{-(r/R)^n}$. Simple linear polymers in solution correspond to the case $n=2$ with the length $R$ of order the radius of gyration and the energy $\epsilon$ for a pair of polymers to fully overlap of order $2k_BT$, where $k_B$ is Boltzmann’s constant and $T$ is the temperature [@Likos01; @DaHa94; @likos:prl:98; @BLHM01; @likos:harreis:02; @Likos06; @LBLM12]. Dendrimers, due to the nature of their chemical architecture, can have an effective interaction with a higher value of $n$; such systems form so-called cluster crystals [@LBLM12] and there has been much interest in soft potential models for these systems [@LLWL00; @ALE04; @MGKNL07; @MoLi07; @LMGK07; @TMAL09; @NKL12].
Here we consider a model two-dimensional system of soft particles that interact via the potential $$V(r)=\epsilon e^{-(r/R)^8}+\epsilon Ae^{-(r/R_s)^8}.
\label{eq:pair_pot}$$ This potential is finite for all $r$ and has a shoulder when the parameter $A\neq0$, with two length scales. The radius of the core is $R$ and the radius of the shoulder is $R_s>R$; the energy for complete overlap is $(1+A)\epsilon$. Such a potential is a simple coarse-grained model for the effective interaction between dendrimers, star polymers or micelles formed, e.g., from block copolymers, which have a stiff hydrophobic core surrounded by a corona of flexible hydrophilic chains. A related, but piecewise constant potential is used in Ref. [@Barkan2011]. The limits (i) $A\to0$ or (ii) $A\to \infty$ [*and*]{} $\epsilon\to 0$ with $\epsilon A=$ constant both result in systems with a single crystal phase. In the following we set the dimensionless interaction energy parameter $\beta\epsilon=1$, where $\beta=(k_BT)^{-1}$, and fix the ratio of the two length scales to be $R_s/R=1.855$ (see below).
We use density functional theory (DFT) [@Evans79; @Evans92; @Lutsko10] to study this system. The grand free energy is $$\begin{aligned}
\notag
\Omega[\rho({\mathbf{r}})]&=&k_BT \int {{\mathrm d}\mathbf{r}}\rho({\mathbf{r}})[\ln\Lambda^2\rho({\mathbf{r}})-1]\\
&\,& {}+ \mathcal{F}_{ex}[\rho({\mathbf{r}})] +\int {{\mathrm d}\mathbf{r}}\,(\Phi({\mathbf{r}})-\mu)\rho({\mathbf{r}}),
\label{eq:DFT}
\end{aligned}$$ which is a functional of the one-body (number) density of the particles, $\rho({\mathbf{r}})$, where ${\mathbf{r}}=(x,y)$. The first term is the ideal-gas contribution to the free energy $\mathcal{F}_{id}$, $\Lambda$ is the thermal de Broglie wavelength, $\mu$ is the chemical potential, $\Phi({\mathbf{r}})$ is any external potential that may be confining the system, and $\mathcal{F}_{ex}[\rho({\mathbf{r}})]$ is the excess Helmholtz free energy from the interactions between the particles. The equilibrium density profile is that which minimizes $\Omega[\rho({\mathbf{r}})]$; the corresponding minimum is the thermodynamic grand potential of the system. For a system in the bulk fluid state (i.e., where $\Phi({\mathbf{r}})\equiv 0$), the minimising density is uniform, $\rho=\rho_0$. However, for other state points, when the system freezes to form a solid, $\Omega$ is minimized by a nonuniform $\rho({\mathbf{r}})$, exhibiting sharp peaks. For the systems of soft-core particles considered here, one may approximate $\mathcal{F}_{ex}$ as [@Likos01]: $$\mathcal{F}_{ex}[\rho({\mathbf{r}})]=\frac{1}{2}\int{{\mathrm d}\mathbf{r}}\int{{\mathrm d}\mathbf{r}}'\rho({\mathbf{r}})V(|{\mathbf{r}}-{\mathbf{r}}'|)\rho({\mathbf{r}}').
\label{eq:Fex}$$ This functional generates the random phase approximation (RPA) for the pair direct correlation function $c^{(2)}({\mathbf{r}},{\mathbf{r}}')\equiv-\beta\frac{\delta^2
\mathcal{F}_{ex}}{\delta \rho({\mathbf{r}}) \delta \rho({\mathbf{r}}')}=-\beta V(|{\mathbf{r}}-{\mathbf{r}}'|)$ [@Evans79; @Evans92; @Lutsko10]. If we assume that these are Brownian particles with dynamics $$\dot{{\mathbf{r}}}_i= -\Gamma\nabla_i U(\{{\mathbf{r}}_i\},t) + \Gamma{\bf X}_i(t),
\label{eq:EOM}$$ where the index $i=1,...,N$ labels particles, $U(\{{\mathbf{r}}_i\},t)$ $=\sum_{i=1}^N\Phi({\mathbf{r}}_i)+\sum_{i\neq j}V({\mathbf{r}}_i-{\mathbf{r}}_j)$ is the potential energy of the system and ${\bf X}_i(t)$ is a white noise term, we can investigate the dynamics of the system using Dynamic Density Functional Theory (DDFT) [@MaTa99; @MaTa00; @ArEv04; @ArRa04] in the form $$\frac{\partial\rho({\mathbf{r}},t)}{\partial t} =
\Gamma \nabla\cdot\left[\rho({\mathbf{r}},t)\nabla\frac{\delta\Omega[\rho({\mathbf{r}},t)]}{\delta\rho({\mathbf{r}},t)}\right],
\label{eq:DDFT}$$ where $\rho({\mathbf{r}},t)$ is now the time-dependent nonequilibrium one-body density profile and $\Gamma\equiv\beta D$ is the mobility. Here $D$ is the diffusion coefficient. In deriving Eq. we have used the equilibrium free energy $\mathcal{F}=\mathcal{F}_{id}+\mathcal{F}_{ex}$ to approximate the unknown nonequilibrium free energy.
{width="\hsize"} {width="\hsize"} {width="\hsize"}\
{width="0.55\hsize"}
{width="\hsize"} {width="\hsize"} {width="\hsize"}\
to {width="0.49\columnwidth"} {width="0.49\columnwidth"} {width="0.49\columnwidth"} {width="0.49\columnwidth"}
{width="0.49\columnwidth"} {width="0.49\columnwidth"} {width="0.49\columnwidth"} {width="0.49\columnwidth"}
Fig. \[fig:all\](a) shows the equilibrium phase diagram calculated using Picard iteration [@Roth10] of the DFT Euler–Lagrange equation, starting either from the profile for a nearby state point or a uniform density profile with a small random value added to each point. As the fluid density is increased, the system freezes to form one of two distinct solid phases (Fig. \[fig:profiles\]): for larger values of $A$ the system forms crystal A, a hexagonal crystal with a large lattice spacing, but for smaller values of $A$ it forms crystal B, a hexagonal crystal with a much smaller lattice spacing. The red regions in Fig. \[fig:all\](a) denote thermodynamic coexistence between two different phases at the same temperature, pressure and chemical potential.
To understand the phase diagram we study the structure and stability of a uniform liquid with density $\rho_0$ and $\Phi({\mathbf{r}})\equiv 0$. We follow [@Evans79; @Evans:TDGammaMolecP1979; @ArEv04; @ARTK12] and expand Eq. in powers of $\tilde{\rho}({\mathbf{r}},t)\equiv\rho({\mathbf{r}},t)-\rho_0$. Retaining only linear terms, we find that the growth/decay of different Fourier modes of wave number $k$ follows $\hat{\rho}(k,t)=\hat{\rho}(k,0)
\exp [\omega(k) t]$, where $\omega(k)$ satisfies the dispersion relation [@ArEv04; @ARTK12] $$\omega(k)=-\Gamma k_BT \, k^2 (1 - \rho_0 \hat{c}(k)).
\label{eq:disp_rel}$$ Here $\hat{c}(k)$ is the Fourier transform of the pair direct correlation function; within RPA $\hat{c}(k)=-\beta \hat{V}(k)$, where $\hat{V}(k)$ is the Fourier transform of the pair potential in Eq. . In an equilibrium fluid the static structure factor $S(k)\equiv [1-\rho_0 \hat{c}(k)]^{-1}>0$ for all $k$; such a fluid is therefore stable [@HM]. Within RPA the two length scales in the pair potential lead, for certain ranges of parameter values, to a static structure factor $S(k)$ with two peaks. Fig. \[fig:all\](b)–(d) shows that as $A$ increases the smaller $k$ peak in $S(k)$ grows and comes to dominate the larger $k$ peak. Fig. \[fig:all\](e)–(g) shows analogous behavior of $\omega(k)$ at several points in or on the boundary of the linearly unstable region $\omega(k_{max})=0$, where $k_{max}$ is the wave number of the [*higher*]{} peak (blue dashed line in Fig. \[fig:all\](a)): as $A$ increases the instability shifts from large $k$ (Fig. \[fig:all\](g)) to small $k$ (Fig. \[fig:all\](e)). The short and long length scales are simultaneously marginally stable at $A=1.067$ and $\rho_0R^2=2.95$ (Fig. \[fig:all\](f)); this point lies on the pink dotted line in Fig. \[fig:all\](a) corresponding to a pair of equal height peaks in $\omega(k)$. Above (below) this line, the peak at smaller (larger) wave number $k$ is higher, indicating that the longer (shorter) length scale density fluctuations grow the fastest. The black double dotted lines indicate the location of $\omega(k_{max})=0$ for the [*lower*]{} peak in $\omega(k)$. When the system is quenched from a stable liquid state to a state point with density $\rho_0$ above the blue dashed line, certain wave numbers will grow as described by $\omega(k)$.
Fig. \[fig:profiles\](c), shows the density profile of the larger lattice spacing crystal A phase for a state point not far from the transition to the smaller lattice spacing crystal B phase. However, the panel below displaying $\ln [R^2\rho({\mathbf{r}})]$ reveals an interconnected network of channels between the density peaks. The particles contributing to this part of the density profile are fluid in the sense that they can move freely throughout the whole system, unlike the majority of the particles that are located in density peaks at multiply occupied lattice sites. [This is the crystal-liquid (CL) state.]{} This state minimizes the free energy for $A>A_\mathrm{co}$, where $A_\mathrm{co}$ is the value at coexistence. [Interfaces between the different phases in Fig. \[fig:profiles\] are present whenever these coexist (cf. [@Oettel12; @MNT90]), but these will be discussed elsewhere.]{}
To confirm the existence of the CL state we calculate the density profile for a system within a square confining potential $\Phi$ of size $L\times L$ with hard walls, and compare the results with Brownian dynamics (BD) simulations, i.e., simulations of $N$ particles evolving according to Eq. . Averaging over the positions of the particles to calculate the density profile, we find remarkably good agreement between the DFT and the BD results (Fig. \[fig:DFTvBD\]). The resulting system thus consists of two dynamically distinct populations, in contrast to related systems [@Glaser_etal; @ImRe04; @ImRe06; @Archer08] in which the dynamics of all the particles are identical. [In Fig. \[fig:free\_energy\] we display, for $\beta\mu=39$, the percentage of mobile particles in crystal A as a function of $A$, obtained by integration over all portions of the density profile that are a distance $0.65R$ away from the centre of the density peaks. Particles contributing to this portion of the density are defined to be mobile. For $\beta\mu=0.39$, the two crystal phases coexist at $A_{\rm co}\approx0.75$; the proportion of mobile particles increases rapidly as $A\to A_{\rm co}^+$ and reaches over 7% at this value of the chemical potential. In fact, as $A$ is further decreased it is this growing number that triggers the formation of the smaller length scale crystal: these mobile particles freeze to form the extra peaks of crystal B. ]{}
*Observation of metastable QCs:* A striking aspect of the phase diagram in Fig. \[fig:all\](a) is that the phase transition between the two different crystal phases (thin red region) is well away from where the two peaks in the dispersion relation have the same height (pink dotted line). A uniform system quenched to the region above the coexistence of the two crystal phases but below this line will initially generate small length scale density fluctuations and the system behaves as if it were going to form crystal B. However, the true minimum of the free energy is the larger length scale crystal. Thus, as growing density fluctuations reach the nonlinear regime, the system seeks to go to the longer length scale structure but the smaller length scale imprinted from the linear growth regime leads to frustration. Sometimes the system is able to evolve to the larger length scale crystal; at other times it stays stuck in the metastable small length scale crystal B structure. However, often the system forms a state with density peaks on both length scales, but no long range order. In Fig. \[fig:B\] we display two rather striking density profiles calculated near state point 2b in Fig. \[fig:all\](a). The upper profile was calculated using Picard iteration starting from random initial conditions. The density profile has many defects, but it has definite quasicrystalline ordering, as can be seen from the corresponding Fourier transform. The lower panels in Fig. \[fig:B\] show a defect-free QC approximant, started from carefully chosen initial conditions. The two wavenumbers $k_1R=3.2$ and $k_2R=6.0$ corresponding to the maxima in $\omega(k)$ are indicated in the Fourier transforms.
![\[fig:DFTvBD\] $\ln [R^2\rho({\mathbf{r}})]$ for a system of $N=600$ particles with $(\rho_0R^2,A)=(4.0,0.8)$ confined in a square region of side $L=10 R$ obtained from BD simulatios (left panel) and DFT (right panel). The system forms crystal A with a density profile consisting of an array of peaks surrounded by a connected network within which the particles are free to move – the CL state. ](fig3a.png "fig:"){width="0.49\columnwidth"} ![\[fig:DFTvBD\] $\ln [R^2\rho({\mathbf{r}})]$ for a system of $N=600$ particles with $(\rho_0R^2,A)=(4.0,0.8)$ confined in a square region of side $L=10 R$ obtained from BD simulatios (left panel) and DFT (right panel). The system forms crystal A with a density profile consisting of an array of peaks surrounded by a connected network within which the particles are free to move – the CL state. ](fig3b.png "fig:"){width="0.49\columnwidth"}
![Grand potential density for $\beta\mu=39$ as a function of $A$ for the two different crystal structures and the QC solution displayed in Fig. \[fig:B\]. There is a point where all three have almost the same free energy, but the QC solution is never the global minimum of the free energy (see inset). The crystal A phase is of CL type throughout the range of $A$ shown. [We also display the % of mobile particles in the crystal A phase.]{}[]{data-label="fig:free_energy"}](fig5_new.pdf){width="0.9\columnwidth"}
![Left: $\ln [R^2\rho({\mathbf{r}})]$ from DFT, for $(\rho_0R^2,A)=(3.5,0.8)$. Right: the corresponding Fourier transforms. The 12-fold symmetry is indicative of QC ordering. The upper profile was obtained from random initial conditions, while the lower one was started from initial conditions with QC symmetry.[]{data-label="fig:B"}](fig4a.png "fig:"){width="0.53\columnwidth"} ![Left: $\ln [R^2\rho({\mathbf{r}})]$ from DFT, for $(\rho_0R^2,A)=(3.5,0.8)$. Right: the corresponding Fourier transforms. The 12-fold symmetry is indicative of QC ordering. The upper profile was obtained from random initial conditions, while the lower one was started from initial conditions with QC symmetry.[]{data-label="fig:B"}](fig4b.png "fig:"){width="0.45\columnwidth"}
![Left: $\ln [R^2\rho({\mathbf{r}})]$ from DFT, for $(\rho_0R^2,A)=(3.5,0.8)$. Right: the corresponding Fourier transforms. The 12-fold symmetry is indicative of QC ordering. The upper profile was obtained from random initial conditions, while the lower one was started from initial conditions with QC symmetry.[]{data-label="fig:B"}](fig4c.png "fig:"){width="0.53\columnwidth"} ![Left: $\ln [R^2\rho({\mathbf{r}})]$ from DFT, for $(\rho_0R^2,A)=(3.5,0.8)$. Right: the corresponding Fourier transforms. The 12-fold symmetry is indicative of QC ordering. The upper profile was obtained from random initial conditions, while the lower one was started from initial conditions with QC symmetry.[]{data-label="fig:B"}](fig4d.png "fig:"){width="0.45\columnwidth"}
The Picard iteration of the Euler–Lagrange equation corresponds to fictitious dynamics since it does not conserve the total number of particles in the system, $N\equiv\int{{\mathrm d}\mathbf{r}}\rho({\mathbf{r}})$. The true dynamics is governed by the DDFT Eq. . Evolving this equation is much slower, but in most cases the same qualitative behavior is observed. The supplementary material below shows time-dependent QC formation obtained using DDFT. The conserved DDFT dynamics does however lead to a higher likelihood of getting stuck in the crystal B structure formed in the initial linear growth regime. For $\beta\epsilon=1$, $R_s/R=1.855$ the QCs we find are never the minimum free energy state (Fig. \[fig:free\_energy\]). The QC state in Fig. \[fig:B\] remains stable against small perturbations for $1.77 <R_s/R< 2.18$, but we have not calculated the full phase diagram for $R_s/R\neq1.855$ (at $R_s/R=1.885$ the two marginally stable wave numbers (Fig. \[fig:all\](f)) are very close to the ratio $2\cos(\pi/12)=1.93$, favoring 12-fold QCs). We believe it may be possible to use nonlinear dynamics techniques [@Rucklidge2012] to compute the stability properties of these states by reducing the DDFT description in Eq. to a phase field crystal model, cf. [@Elder2002; @Huang2010a; @Teeffelen2009; @Emmerich2012; @ARTK12]. We expect that the observed QC formation mechanism (linear growth of one length scale, but nonlinear selection favoring another) may well apply more generally.
Acknowledgement: This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under grant DMS-1211953 (EK). We are grateful for discussions with R. Lifshitz and P. Olmsted.
[61]{} natexlab\#1[\#1]{}bibnamefont \#1[\#1]{}bibfnamefont \#1[\#1]{}citenamefont \#1[\#1]{}url \#1[`#1`]{}urlprefix\[2\][\#2]{} \[2\]\[\][[\#2](#2)]{}
, , , , ****, ().
, ****, ().
, , , , , , ****, ().
, , , , , ****, ().
, ****, ().
, , , , , , ****, ().
, , , , , , , , ****, ().
, ****, ().
, , , ****, ().
, ****, ().
, , , ****, ().
, , , ****, ().
, ****, ().
, , , ****, ().
, ****, ().
, ****, ().
, ****, ().
, ****, ().
, , , ****, ().
, ****, ().
, ****, ().
, , , ****, ().
, ****, ().
, ****, ().
, , , ****, ().
, , , ****, ().
, ****, ().
, ****, ().
, , , , , , , ****, ().
, , , , ****, ().
, ****, ().
, ****, ().
, , , , ****, ().
, , , , ****, ().
, , , ****, ().
, , , , , ****, ().
, ****, ().
, , , , ****, ().
, , , ****, ().
, , , ****, ().
, ****, ().
, ** (, , ).
, ****, ().
, , , ****, ().
, , , ****, ().
, ****, ().
, ****, ().
, ****, ().
, ****, ().
, , , , ****, ().
, ** (, , ), ed.
, ****, ().
, , , ****, ().
, , , , , , ****, ().
, ****, ().
, **** ().
, ****, ().
, , , , ****, ().
, , , ****, ().
, , , , ****, ().
, , , , , , , ****, ().
Supplementary material
======================
{width="2.3in"} {width="2.3in"} {width="2.3in"}
{width="2.3in"} {width="2.3in"} {width="2.3in"}
{width="2.3in"} {width="2.3in"} {width="2.3in"}
{width="2.3in"} {width="2.3in"} {width="2.3in"}
{width="3in"} {width="3in"}
In this supplementary material, we display examples the dynamics of quasicrystal (QC) formation, obtained (i) via Picard iteration of the DFT (Fig. \[fig:Picard\]) and (ii) from dynamical density functional theory (DDFT) (Fig. \[fig:DDFT\]). In Fig. \[fig:Picard\] we display snapshots of the logarithm of the density profile $\ln[R^2\rho({\mathbf{r}})]$ as the system evolves in time, for the state point $A=0.8$ and $\rho R^2=3.5$. The initial time $t=0$ profile corresponds to a uniform density plus a small amplitude random value everywhere. The early time linear growth regime produces [**one**]{} length scale, as can be observed from Fig. \[fig:Picard\] and also from the dispersion relation, displayed in Fig. \[fig:disp\_rel1\]. This leads to the formation of the small length-scale crystal B phase – see, e.g. the middle and right hand panels in the top row of Fig. \[fig:Picard\]. However, over time, starting from the grain boundary and regions where defects are present, the longer length scale in the system appears, leading to the formation of the QC. This occurs when the dynamics of the system is well away from the linear regime.
In Fig. \[fig:DDFT\] we display snapshots of $\ln[R^2\rho({\mathbf{r}})]$ as the system evolves in time, for the state point $A=1.067$ and $\rho R^2=3.5$ (note that the linear instability line is at $\rho R^2=2.95$, thus this state point is quite a deep quench). The dynamics we obtain from the DDFT displayed in Fig. \[fig:DDFT\] is very similar to that obtained from the Picard iteration in Fig. \[fig:Picard\]. The DDFT dynamics is for over-damped Brownian particles, as described in our Letter (and references therein). The Picard iteration used to generate Fig. \[fig:Picard\] does not conserve particle number. It is, however, much faster than the full DDFT and gives qualitatively similar results – compare Figs. \[fig:Picard\] and \[fig:DDFT\]. In Fig. \[fig:disp\_rel1\] we also display the dispersion relation for the state point $A=1.067$ and $\rho R^2=3.5$, which corresponds to the results in Fig. \[fig:DDFT\]. Here we see that the system is linearly unstable at two distinct wavelengths. However, the peak corresponding to the smaller length scale (large $k$) is much higher than that of the longer length scale (small $k$) and so during the early time linear growth regime after the system is quenched, the smaller length scale grows much faster, so that there is no sign of the longer length scale in the early time density profile displayed in the top left hand panel of Fig. \[fig:DDFT\].
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
author:
- |
A. Hunter$^{1,*}$, B. A. Moore$^{2}$, M. K. Mudunuru$^{3}$, V. T. Chau$^{3}$, R. L. Miller$^{4}$, R. B. Tchoua$^{5}$, C. Nyshadham$^{6}$, S. Karra$^{3}$, D. O’Malley$^{3}$, E. Rougier$^{3}$, H. S. Viswanathan$^{3}$, and G. Srinivasan$^{1}$\
[$^{1}$X-Computational Physics Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545.]{}\
[$^{2}$Center for Nonlinear Studies, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545.]{}\
[$^{3}$Earth and Environmental Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545.]{}\
[$^{4}$Computer, Computational, and Statistical Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545.]{}\
[$^{5}$Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.]{}\
[$^{6}$Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602.]{}\
bibliography:
- 'Master\_References/paper\_bib.bib'
title: 'Reduced-Order Modeling through Machine Learning Approaches for Brittle Fracture Applications'
---
ABSTRACT {#abstract .unnumbered}
========
In this paper, five different approaches for reduced-order modeling of brittle fracture in geomaterials, specifically concrete, are presented and compared. Four of the five methods rely on machine learning (ML) algorithms to approximate important aspects of the brittle fracture problem. In addition to the ML algorithms, each method incorporates different physics-based assumptions in order to reduce the computational complexity while maintaining the physics as much as possible. This work specifically focuses on using the ML approaches to model a 2D concrete sample under low strain rate pure tensile loading conditions with 20 preexisting cracks present. A high-fidelity finite element-discrete element model is used to both produce a training dataset of 150 simulations and an additional 35 simulations for validation. Results from the ML approaches are directly compared against the results from the high-fidelity model. Strengths and weaknesses of each approach are discussed and the most important conclusion is that a combination of physics-informed and data-driven features are necessary for emulating the physics of crack propagation, interaction and coalescence. All of the models presented here have runtimes that are orders of magnitude faster than the original high-fidelity model and pave the path for developing accurate reduced order models that could be used to inform larger length-scale models with important sub-scale physics that often cannot be accounted for due to computational cost. **Keywords:** Brittle fracture, machine learning, crack interaction, artificial neural networks.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS {#acknowledgments .unnumbered}
===============
The authors would like to acknowledge support from the Los Alamos National Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program through the Directed Research Project \# 20170103DR. MKM and SK authors also thank the support of the LANL LDRD Early Career Award 20150693ECR. MKM gratefully acknowledges the support of LANL Chick-Keller Postdoctoral Fellowship through Center for Space and Earth Sciences (CSES). Authors thank the LANL Institutional Computing program for their support in generating data used in this work.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We present an approximation scheme of the nonperturbative renormalization group that preserves the momentum dependence of correlation functions. This approximation scheme can be seen as a simple improvement of the local potential approximation (LPA) where the derivative terms in the effective action are promoted to arbitrary momentum-dependent functions. As in the LPA the only field dependence comes from the effective potential, which allows us to solve the renormalization-group equations at a relatively modest numerical cost (as compared, e.g., to the Blaizot–Mendéz-Galain–Wschebor approximation scheme). As an application we consider the two-dimensional quantum O($N$) model at zero temperature. We discuss not only the two-point correlation function but also higher-order correlation functions such as the scalar susceptibility (which allows for an investigation of the “Higgs” amplitude mode) and the conductivity. In particular we show how, using Padé approximants to perform the analytic continuation $i\wn\to\w+i0^+$ of imaginary frequency correlation functions $\chi(i\wn)$ computed numerically from the renormalization-group equations, one can obtain spectral functions in the real-frequency domain.'
author:
- 'F. Rose'
- 'N. Dupuis'
date: 'April 23, 2018'
title: 'Nonperturbative renormalization-group approach preserving the momentum dependence of correlation functions'
---
Introduction
============
The nonperturbative renormalization-group (NPRG) provides us with a general formalism to study classical and quantum many-body systems.[@Berges02; @Delamotte12; @Kopietz_book] It has been applied to a variety of physical systems ranging from particle-physics to statistical mechanics and condensed matter (see, e.g., Ref. ).
The NPRG is based on an exact flow equation for the effective action (or Gibbs free energy), a functional of the order parameter.[@Wetterich93; @Ellwanger93; @Morris94] In general, this equation cannot be solved but offers the possibility of approximation schemes qualitatively different from perturbation theory, allowing, in particular, to tackle nonperturbative problems. So far two main approximations have been proposed. The first one relies on a derivative expansion (DE) of the effective action.[@Tetradis94; @Morris99; @Gersdorff01; @Canet03a; @Jakubczyk14] A nice feature of this approach is the possibility to implement the various symmetries of the problem rather easily. One of its main drawbacks is that it gives access to correlation functions only at vanishing momenta. It can also break down due to some vertices being singular in the infrared limit. In that case even the zero-momentum value of correlation functions is out of reach. The second one, the Blaizot–Méndez-Galain–Wschebor (BMW) approximation scheme,[@Blaizot06; @Benitez09; @Benitez12] is based on a truncation of the infinite hierarchy of equations satisfied by correlation functions. Its main advantage over DE is to preserve the full momentum dependence of (low-order) correlation functions. Its limitations are twofold. First it leads to flow equations which, in some cases, can be solved only at a high numerical cost. Second, symmetries can be difficult to implement.
In this paper we consider another approximation scheme, dubbed LPA$''$ for reasons that will become clear below (LPA stands for local potential approximation). The LPA$''$ was originally introduced in Ref. to compute the critical exponents and momentum-dependent correlation functions in the O($N$) model. By contrast with the DE, the LPA$''$ relies on an ansatz for the effective action parameterized by *non-local* potentials, an idea that has been recently discussed both in the context of statistical physics[@Canet16a] and quantum field theory.[@Feldmann17] It was used in Ref. for the calculation of the conductivity of the two-dimensional quantum O($N$) model in order to circumvent the failure of BMW and DE approximation schemes.[^1]
Our aim is to benchmark the LPA$''$ considering as a test-bed the two-dimensional quantum O($N\geq 2$) model at zero temperature. In addition to the critical exponents of the quantum phase transition due to the spontaneous breaking of O($N$) symmetry, the excitation gap in the disordered phase and the stiffness in the ordered phase, we compute the momentum dependence of the two-point correlation function, the scalar O($N$) invariant susceptibility (which allows for an investigation of the “Higgs” amplitude mode[@Podolsky11]) and the conductivity. Since at zero temperature the two-dimensional quantum model is equivalent to the three-dimensional classical model, we shall in a first step consider the latter and compute the momentum dependence of the various correlation functions $\chi(\p)$ of interest. To obtain the retarded correlation functions and the spectral functions in the two-dimensional quantum model we then perform an analytic continuation $|\p|\to -i\w+0^+$ using Padé approximants.[@Vidberg77]
The outline of the paper is as follows. The general formalism is introduced in Sec. \[sec\_nprg\]. After a presentation of the quantum O($N$) model (Sec. \[subsec\_qON\]) and the NPRG approach to the computation of the two-point correlation function, scalar susceptibility and conductivity (Sec. \[subsec\_nprg\]), we describe the LPA$''$ (Sec. \[subsec\_lpapp\]). Results for universal quantities near the quantum critical point (QCP), critical exponents and universal scaling functions, are discussed in Sec. \[sec\_spectral\]. Whenever possible comparison is made with DE and BMW results as well as Monte Carlo simulations or conformal bootstrap. Technical details can be found in Appendix \[app\_rgeq\].
NPRG approach {#sec_nprg}
=============
Quantum O($N$) model {#subsec_qON}
--------------------
The two-dimensional quantum O($N$) model is defined by the Euclidean action $$S = \int_\x \biggl\lbrace \half \sum_{\mu=x,y,\tau}(\dmu\varphibf)^2
+ \frac{r_0}{2} \varphibf^2 + \frac{u_0}{4!N} {(\varphibf^2)}^2 \biggr\rbrace ,
\label{action1}$$ where we use the notation $\x=(\r,\tau)$ and $\int_\x=\inttau \int d^2r$. $\varphibf(\x)$ is an $N$-component real field, $\r$ a two-dimensional coordinate, $\tau\in [0,\beta]$ an imaginary time, and $\beta=1/T$ the inverse temperature (we set $\hbar=k_B=1$). $r_0$ and $u_0$ are temperature-independent coupling constants and the (bare) velocity of the $\varphibf$ field has been set to unity. The model is regularized by an ultraviolet cutoff $\Lamb$. Assuming $u_0$ fixed, there is a quantum phase transition between a disordered phase ($r_0>r_{0c}$) and an ordered phase ($r_0<r_{0c}$) where the O($N$) symmetry is spontaneously broken. The QCP at $r_0=r_{0c}$ is in the universality class of the three-dimensional classical O($N$) model and the phase transition is governed by the three-dimensional Wilson–Fisher fixed point.
At zero-temperature the two-dimensional quantum model is equivalent to the three-dimensional classical model. We thus identify $\tau$ with a third spatial dimension so that $\x=(\r,\tau)\equiv (x,y,z)$. A correlation function $\chi(p_x,p_y,p_z)$ computed in the classical model then corresponds to the correlation function $\chi(p_x,p_y,i\wn)$ of the quantum model, with $\wn\equiv p_z$ a bosonic Matsubara frequency,[^2] and yields the retarded dynamical correlation function $\chi^R(p_x,p_y,\w)$ after analytic continuation $i\wn\to\w+i0^+$. Having in mind the two-dimensional quantum O($N$) model, we shall refer to the critical point of the three-dimensional classical model as the QCP.
### Scalar susceptibility {#sec_Sh}
To compute the scalar, O($N$) invariant, susceptibility [\_[s]{}]{}(,’) = - , \[chis\_def\] we introduce an external source term $h$ which couples to $\varphibf^2$, S\[,h\] = S\[\] - \_h \^2 . \[Sh\] The scalar susceptibility can then be computed as the functional derivative [\_[s]{}]{}(,’) = |\_[h=0]{} \[chis\_def1\] of the partition function $\calZ[h]=\int \calD[\varphibf] \exp(-S[\varphibf,h])$ in the presence of the source $h$.
### Conductivity {#sec_SA}
The O($N$) symmetry of the action (\[action1\]) implies the conservation of the total angular momentum and the existence of a conserved current. To compute the associated conductivity, we include in the model an external non-Abelian gauge field $A_\mu=A_\mu^a T^a$ (with an implicit sum over repeated discrete indices), where $\{T^a\}$ denotes a set of SO($N$) generators (made of $N(N-1)/2$ linearly independent skew-symmetric matrices). This amounts to replacing the derivative $\dmu$ in Eq. (\[action1\]) by the covariant derivative $D_\mu=\dmu-q A_\mu$ (we set the charge $q$ equal to unity in the following and restore it, as well as $\hbar$, whenever necessary), S\[,\] = \_\_[=x,y,z]{}(D\_)\^2 + \^2 + \^2 . \[SA\] This makes the action invariant in the local gauge transformation $\varphibf'=O\varphibf$ and $\Amu'= O \Amu O^T +(\dmu O)O^T$ where $O$ is a space-dependent SO($N$) rotation. The current density $\Jmua(\x) = - \delta S/\delta \Amua(\x)$ is then expressed as [@Rose17] = -T\^a , = T\^a , where $\jmua$ denotes the “paramagnetic” part.
In the two-dimensional quantum model, the real-frequency conductivity is defined by[@Rose17] $$\sigmunuab(\w) = \sigmunuab(i\wn\to \w+i0^+) = \frac{1}{i(\w+i0^+)} \Kmunuab{}^R(\w) ,
\label{sigR}$$ where $\Kmunuab{}^R(\w)=\Kmunuab(i\wn\to\w+i0^+)$ denotes the retarded part of $\Kmunuab(i\wn)\equiv\Kmunuab(p_x=0,p_y=0,p_z=\wn)$. $\Kmunuab(\p)$ is the correlation function of the three-dimensional classical O($N$) model defined by (-’) = (-’) - \_(-’), \[Kdef2\] with $$\Pimunuab(\x-\x') = \mean{\jmua(\x) \jnub(\x')}$$ the paramagnetic current-current correlation function.
NPRG formalism {#subsec_nprg}
--------------
Let us briefly recall the main steps of the NPRG implementation (we refer to Ref. for more detail).We add to the action a regulator term $\Delta S_k[\varphibf]$ which depends on a cutoff function $R_k(\q)$, where $k$ a momentum scale which varies from the microscopic scale $\Lamb$ down to 0.[@Berges02; @Delamotte12; @Kopietz_book] In practice we take the exponential cutoff function R\_k() = Z\_k \^2 r( ), r(y) = , \[Rkdef\] where $\alpha$ is a constant of order one and $Z_k$ a field-renormalization factor. (In the LPA$''$ discussed below, $Z_k\equiv Z_k(\p=0)$.)
The partition function $\calZ_k[\J]$, computed in the presence of an external source $\J$ linearly coupled to the field, is now $k$ dependent and so is the order parameter $\phibf_k[\x;\J] = \mean{\varphibf(\x)}$. The scale-dependent effective action $\Gamma_k[\phibf]$, defined as a (slightly modified) Legendre transform of $-\ln \calZ_k[\J]$, satisfies Wetterich’s equation[@Wetterich93] $$\dk \Gamma_k[\phibf] = \half \Tr \Bigl\{ \dk R_k \bigl(\Gamma_k^{(2)}[\phibf] + R_k \bigr)^{-1} \Bigr\} ,
\label{Weteq}$$ with initial condition $\Gamma_\Lambda[\phibf]=S[\phibf]$. At $k=0$ the regulator vanishes and $\Gamma_{k=0}[\phibf]=\Gamma[\phibf]$. Here $\Gamma_k^{(2)}[\phibf]$ denotes the second-order functional derivative with respect to $\phibf$ of $\Gamma_k[\phibf]$ and the trace runs over both space and internal O($N$) variables.
All information about the thermodynamics of the system can be deduced from the effective potential $U_k(\rho) = V^{-1} \Gamma_k[\phibf]$ obtained from the effective action in a uniform field configuration ($V$ denotes the volume of the system). For symmetry reasons, $U_k$ is function of the O($N$) invariant $\rho=\phibf^2/2$. We denote by $\rho_{0,k}$ the value of $\rho$ at the minimum of the effective potential. Spontaneous symmetry breaking of the O($N$) symmetry is characterized by a nonvanishing expectation value of the field $\varphibf$, i.e., $\lim_{k\to 0}\rho_{0,k} = \rho_0 > 0$.
On the other hand correlation functions can be related to the one-particle irreducible (1PI) vertices $\Gamma_k^{(n)}$ defined as the functional derivatives of $\Gamma_k$. In particular, the two-point correlation function (propagator) $G_k=(\Gamma_k^{(2)}+R_k)^{-1}$ is simply related to the two-point vertex $\Gamma_k^{(2)}$. The latter can be written as \^[(2)]{}\_[k,ij]{}(,) = \_[ij]{} \_[A,k]{}(,) + \_i \_j \_[B,k]{}(,) , \[Gamma2\] where $\Gamma_{\rm A,k}$ and $\Gamma_{B,k}$ are functions of $\rho$ and $|\p|$. Important information can be obtained from the longitudinal and transverse susceptibilities, $\chi_\alpha(\p)\equiv G_{k=0,\alpha}(\p,\rho_0)$ ($\alpha={\rm L,T}$), where $G_{k,\alpha}^{-1}({\mathbf{p}},\rho)=\Gamma^{(2)}_{\alpha,k}(\p,\rho)+R_k(\p)$ with $$\begin{aligned}
\Gamma^{(2)}_{\mathrm{L},k}(\p,\rho)&=\Gamma_{A,k}(\p,\rho) + 2 \rho \Gamma_{B,k}(\p,\rho),{\nonumber \\}\Gamma^{(2)}_{\mathrm{T},k}(\p,\rho)&=\Gamma_{A,k}(\p,\rho).
\label{chi_def}\end{aligned}$$ In the disordered phase ($\rho_0=0$), $\chi_{\rm L}(\p)=\chi_{\rm T}(\p)\equiv\chi_{\rm L,T}(\p)$ and the correlation length $\xi$ (i.e. the inverse of the excitation gap $\Delta$ of the quantum model[^3]) is finite. In the ordered phase, the stiffness ${\rho_{s}}$ is defined by[@Chaikin_book; @not1] $$\chi_{\rm T}(\p) = \frac{2\rho_0}{{\rho_{s}}\p^2} \quad \mbox{for} \quad \p \to 0 .
\label{rhosdef}$$ For two systems located symmetrically wrt the QCP (i.e. corresponding to the same value of $|r_0-r_{0c}|$), one in the ordered phase (with stiffness ${\rho_{s}}$) and the other in the disordered phase (with correlation length $\xi=1/\Delta$), the ratio ${\rho_{s}}/\Delta={\rho_{s}}\xi$ is a universal number which depends only on $N$. This allows us to use $\Delta$ as the characteristic energy scale in both the disordered and ordered phases (in the latter case, $\Delta$ is defined as the excitation gap at the point located symmetrically wrt the QCP).[@Podolsky12] $\Delta$ and ${\rho_{s}}$ vanish as $|r_0-r_{0c}|^{\nu}$ as we approach the QCP.
Although in principle the knowledge of the propagator $G_k$ and the four-point vertex $\Gamma_k^{(4)}$ is sufficient to obtain the scalar susceptibility ${\chi_{s}}$ and the conductivity $\sigma$, this approach is in practice difficult as it requires to know the momentum dependence of $\Gamma_k^{(4)}(\p_1,\p_2,\p_3,\p_4)$ for all momentum scales. It is much easier to compute ${\chi_{s}}$ and $\sigma$ directly from flow equations by introducing appropriate external sources as described in Secs. \[sec\_Sh\] and \[sec\_SA\].
### Scalar susceptibility {#sec_nprg:subsubsec_chis}
To compute the scalar susceptibility one considers the partition function $\calZ_k[\J,h]$ in the presence of both the linear source $\J$ and the bilinear source $h$.[@Rancon14; @Rose15] The order parameter $\phi_k[\x;\J,h]$ is now a functional of both $\J$ and $h$. The scale-dependent effective action is defined as a Legendre transform wrt the source $\J$ (but not $h$) and satisfies the flow equation $$\dk \Gamma_k[\phibf,h] = \half \Tr \Bigl\{ \dk R_k \bigl(\Gamma_k^{(2,0)}[\phibf,h] + R_k \bigr)^{-1} \Bigr\}
\label{Weteq_h}$$ with the initial condition $\Gamma_\Lambda[\phibf,h]=S[\phibf]-\int_\x h\phibf^2$. $\Gamma_k^{(2,0)}[\phibf,h]$ denotes the second-order functional derivative of $\Gamma_k[\phibf,h]$ wrt $\phibf$. Using (\[chis\_def1\]) one can relate the scalar susceptibility $$\begin{aligned}
{\chi_{s}}(\p) ={}& - \Gamma^{(0,2)}(\p,\bar\phibf) \nonumber \\
& + \Gamma_i^{(1,1)}(\p,\bar\phibf) \Gamma_{ij}^{(2,0)-1}(\p,\bar\phibf) \Gamma_j^{(1,1)}(\p,\bar\phibf)
\label{chis_def2} \end{aligned}$$ to the $k=0$ 1PI vertices $\Gamma^{(n,m)}$ defined as functional derivatives wrt to $\phi$ and $h$ (e.g. $\Gamma^{(1,1)}=\delta^2 \Gamma[\phi,h]/\delta\phi \delta h$) evaluated in a uniform field configuration.[@Rose15] In Eq. (\[chis\_def2\]) $\bar\phibf$ denotes the (uniform) order parameter for $\J=h=0$ and we use the notation $\Gamma^{(n,m)}(\p)\equiv\Gamma^{(n,m)}(\p,-\p)$ for vertices with $n+m=2$.
Using $\Gamma^{(1,1)}_i(\p,\phibf)=\phi_i f(\p,\rho)$ and $\Gamma^{(0,2)}(\p,\phibf)=\gamma(\p,\rho)$, where $f$ and $\gamma$ are functions of $|\p|$ and $\rho$,[@Rose17] we obtain [\_[s]{}]{}() = - (,\_0) + 2\_0 f(,\_0)\^2 G\_[L]{}(,\_0) . To determine the scalar susceptibility in the NPRG approach we must therefore consider the $k$-dependent vertices $\Gamma_k^{(0,2)}$ and $\Gamma_{k,i}^{(1,1)}$ or, equivalently, the $k$-dependent functions $f_k(\p,\rho)$ and $\gamma_k(\p,\rho)$, in addition to the effective potential $U_k(\rho)$ and the vertices $\Gamma_{A,k}(\p,\rho)$ and $\Gamma_{B,k}(\p,\rho)$ determining the propagator.
### Conductivity {#sec_NPRG:subsubsec_cond}
The conductivity can be calculated in a similar way.[@Rose17] However, to respect local gauge invariance, one must use the gauge-invariant regulator term $\Delta S_k[\varphibf,\A]$ obtained from $\Delta S_k[\varphibf]$ by replacing the derivative $\dmu$ by the covariant derivative $D_\mu$. The scale-dependent effective action is defined as a Legendre transform wrt the source $\J$ (but not $\A$) and satisfies the flow equation $$\dk \Gamma_k[\phibf,\A] = \half \Tr \Bigl\{ \dk \calR_k[\A] \bigl(\Gamma_k^{(2,0)}[\phibf,\A] + \calR_k[\A] \bigr)^{-1} \Bigr\} ,
\label{Weteq_A}$$ where $\Gamma_k^{(2,0)}[\phibf,\A]$ and $\calR_k[\A]$ denote the second-order functional derivative with respect to $\phibf$ of $\Gamma_k[\phibf,\A]$ and $\Delta S_k[\phibf,\A]$, respectively.
One can relate the linear response $$\begin{gathered}
\Kmunuab(\p) = - \Gamzdmunuab(\p,\bar\phibf) \\
+ \Gamuuimua(-\p,\bar\phibf) \Gamma^{(2,0)-1}_{ij}(\p,\bar\phibf) \Gamuujnub(\p,\bar\phibf)
\label{Kdef3} \end{gathered}$$ to the $k=0$ 1PI vertices $\Gamma^{(n,m)}$ defined as functional derivatives wrt $\phi$ and $A_\mu$ (e.g. $\Gamuujmua=\delta^2 \Gamma/\delta\phi_j\delta A_\mu^a$) computed in a uniform field $\phibf$ and for $\A=0$.[@Rose17] In Eq. (\[Kdef3\]) $\bar\phibf$ is the (uniform) order parameter in the absence of the gauge field. The O($N$) symmetry implies that $$\begin{split}
\Gamuujmua(\p,\phibf) ={}& ip_\mu (T^a\phibf)_j \Psi_A, \\
\Gamzdmunuab(\p,\phibf) ={}& p_\mu p_\nu [ \delta_{ab} \Psi_B + (T^a\phibf)\cdot(T^b\phibf)\Psi_C ] \\
& + \delta_{\mu\nu} [ \delta_{ab} \bar\Psi_B + (T^a\phibf)\cdot(T^b\phibf)\bar\Psi_C ],
\end{split}
\label{vertA}$$ where $\Psi_A,\Psi_B,\Psi_C,\bar\Psi_B,\bar\Psi_C$ are functions of $\rho$ and $|\p|$. These functions are not independent but are related by Ward identities.[@Rose17]
To obtain the frequency-dependent conductivity in the quantum model, one sets $\p=(0,0,\wn)$ and $\mu,\nu\in\{x,y\}$ so that $p_\mu=p_\nu=0$ and $\Kmunuab(i\wn) = -\Gamzdmunuab(i\wn,\bar\phibf)$ is fully determined by $\Psi_B(i\wn)$ and $\Psi_C(i\wn)$. In the disordered phase ($\rho_0=\bar\phibf^2/2=0$), the conductivity tensor $\sigma_{\mu\nu}^{ab}(i\wn)=\delta_{\mu\nu}\delta_{ab}\sigma(i\wn)$ is diagonal with (i) = -\_B(i,\_0) . In the ordered phase, when $N \geq 3$, the conductivity tensor is defined by two independent components[@Podolsky11] $\sigA(i\wn)$ and $\sigB(i\wn)$ such that $$\begin{aligned}
\sigma_{\mu\nu}^{ab}(i\wn)={}&{}\delta_{\mu\nu}\bigg\{\dfrac{(T^a\phibf)\cdot(T^b\phibf)}{2\rho}[\sigA(i\wn)-\sigB(i\wn)] \nonumber\\
{}&{}+\delta_{ab}\sigB(i\wn)\bigg\}\end{aligned}$$ with
\(i) =& \_A(i,\_0)\
& - ,\
(i) =& -\_B(i,\_0) .
\[sigABdef\] For $N=2$ there is only one SO$(N)$ generator and $\sigma$ reduces to $\sigA$.
LPA$''$ {#subsec_lpapp}
-------
The flow equations (\[Weteq\]), (\[Weteq\_h\]) and (\[Weteq\_A\]) cannot be solved exactly and one has to resort to approximations. In this section we discuss the LPA$''$, first for the calculation of the two-point correlation function ($\A=h=0$) and then for the scalar susceptibility and the conductivity.
### Two-point correlation function
The LPA$''$ can be seen as an improvement of the LPA, where the ansatz for the effective action \_k\^[[LPA]{}]{}\[\] = \_ + U\_k() \[gamlpa\] depends only on the effective potential $U_k(\rho)$. In the LPA$'$, the ansatz $$\begin{aligned}
\Gamma_k^{{\rm LPA}'}[\phibf] ={}& \int_{\x} \biggl\lbrace \half (\dmu\phibf) \cdot Z_k (\dmu\phibf) \nonumber \\
& + \quarter (\partial_\mu \rho) Y_k (\partial_\mu \rho) + U_k(\rho) \biggr\rbrace
\label{gamlpap}\end{aligned}$$ includes a field-renormalization factor $Z_k$ and (sometimes) a derivative quartic term $Y_k$. The standard improvement of the LPA$'$ is the derivative expansion to second order where $Z_k$ and $Y_k$ become functions of $\rho$.[@Berges02] Here we follow a different route and improve over the LPA$'$ by promoting $Z_k$ and $Y_k$ to functions of the derivative $-{\boldsymbol\partial}^2\equiv -\partial_\mu^2$, which yields $$\begin{aligned}
\Gamma_k^{{\rm LPA}''}[\phibf] ={}&
\int_\x \biggl\lbrace \half (\dmu\phibf) \cdot Z_k(-{\boldsymbol\partial}^2) (\dmu\phibf)
\nonumber \\ & + \quarter (\partial_\mu \rho) Y_k(-{\boldsymbol\partial}^2) (\partial_\mu \rho) + U_k(\rho) \biggr\rbrace
\label{lpapp} \end{aligned}$$ with initial conditions $Z_\Lamb(\p)=1$, $Y_\Lamb(\p)=0$ and $U_\Lamb(\rho)=r_0\rho+(u_0/6N)\rho^2$. In the LPA$''$ the effective action is thus defined by the effective potential $U_k(\rho)$ and two functions of $\p^2$, $Z_k(\p^2)$ and $Y_k(\p^2)$, which we simply denote by $Z_k(\p)$ and $Y_k(\p)$ in the following. The transverse and longitudinal parts of the two-point vertex (\[Gamma2\]) in a uniform field $\phibf$ are obtained from
\_[A,k]{}(,) &= Z\_k()\^2 + U’\_k() ,\
\_[B,k]{}(,) &= \^2 + U”\_k() .
\[GamAB\_lpapp\] Thus the main improvement of the LPA$''$ over the LPA$'$ is that the full momentum dependence of the propagator $G_k(\p,\phibf)$ is preserved by virtue of the momentum dependence of $Z_k(\p)$ and $Y_k(\p)$. In the LPA$'$, where the momentum dependence of $Z_k(\p)\equiv Z_k$ and $Y_k(\p)\equiv Y_k$ is neglected, we obtain a $\p^2$ variation of the two-point vertex. This $\p^2$ dependence is valid for $|\p|\ll k$ (which corresponds to the domain of validity of DE and LPA$'$) and is due to the regulator term $\Delta S_k$ which ensures that all vertices are regular functions of $\p^2/k^2$ in the limit $\p/k\to 0$. The anomalous dimension $\eta$ can be computed since $Z_k$ diverges as $k^{-\eta}$ at the critical point but the LPA$'$ does not allow us to obtain the full momentum dependence of the propagator ([*stricto sensu*]{} the LPA$'$ is valid only for $\p\to 0$ in the limit $k\to 0$). In the LPA$''$, we expect G\_[k=0]{}(,=0) \~||\^[-2+]{}, Z\_[k=0]{}() \~||\^[-]{} \[Glpapp\_qcp\] at the QCP.[^4] This result should be valid for $|\p|$ smaller than the Ginzburg momentum scale $p_G\sim u_0/24\pi$.[@Rancon13a] Thus the anomalous dimension $\eta$ can be retrieved from the momentum dependence of $Z_k(\p)$.
When $N\geq 2$ the excitation gap in the disordered phase turns out to be very well approximated by = \^[-1]{} = \_[k0]{} , \[Delta\] which follows from the expansion to $\calO(\p^2)$ of $\Gamma^{(2)}_{k,\rm T}(\p)=\Gamma_{A,k}(\p)$ \[Eq. (\[GamAB\_lpapp\])\]. In Sec. \[subsec\_spectral\_chi\] we shall see that in the disordered phase the spectral function $\chi_{\rm L,T}''(\w)$ exhibits a sharp peak at the energy $\Delta$ defined by (\[Delta\]). On the other hand the stiffness, defined by (\[rhosdef\]), is obtained from [\_[s]{}]{}= 2 Z\_k(=0) \_0 . \[rhos\_def1\]
The RG equations for $Z_k(\p)$ and $Y_k(\p)$ can be obtained by using
Z\_k() &= ,\
Z\_k() + \_[0,k]{} Y\_k() &= ,
and the RG equation satisfied by $\Gamma_k^{(2)}(\p,\phibf)$ (see Appendix \[app\_rgeq\]). In the usual way, we define $Z_k(\p)$ and $Y_k(\p)$ from the two-point vertex evaluated at the minimum $\rho_{0,k}$ of the effective potential $U_k(\rho)$.[@Berges02]
### Scalar susceptibility {#scalar-susceptibility}
In the presence of a nonzero external source $h$, we consider the following ansatz for the effective action, $$\begin{aligned}
\Gamma^{\mathrm{LPA}''}_k[\phibf,h] ={}& \Gamma^{\mathrm{LPA}''}_k[\phibf]
+ \half \int_\x h(\x) f_k(-\boldsymbol{\partial}^2) \phibf(\x)^2 \nonumber \\ & + \half \int_\x h(\x) \gamma_k(-\boldsymbol{\partial}^2) h(\x) ,
\label{lpapp1} \end{aligned}$$ with initial conditions $f_\Lambda(\p)=-2$ and $\gamma_\Lambda(\p)=0$. In addition to the effective potential, the effective action includes four functions of momentum: $Z_k(\p)$, $Y_k(\p)$, $f_k(\p)$ and $\gamma_k(\p)$. Equation (\[lpapp1\]) yields
\^[(1,1)]{}\_[i,k]{}(,) &= \_i f\_k() ,\
\^[(0,2)]{}\_[k]{}(,) &= \_k() ,
in agreement with the general form of $\Gamma^{(1,1)}$ and $ \Gamma^{(0,2)}$ (Sec. \[sec\_nprg:subsubsec\_chis\]). The functions $f_k$ and $\gamma_k$ do not depend on $\rho$ in the LPA$''$. Their flow equations can be deduced from $\dk\Gamma^{(1,1)}_{i,k}$ and $\dk\Gamma^{(0,2)}_{k}$ (see Appendix \[app\_rgeq\]).
### Conductivity {#conductivity}
In the presence of a nonzero gauge field $\A$ we make the effective action (\[lpapp\]) gauge invariant by replacing the derivative $\dmu$ by the covariant derivative $D_\mu$. $\Gamma_k[\phibf,\A]$ may also include terms depending on the field strength F\_ = - \[D\_,D\_\] = - - \[,\] . \[Fmunu\] From $F_{\mu\nu}$ one can construct two invariant terms, namely $\tr(F^2_{\mu\nu})$ and $(F_{\mu\nu}\phibf)^2$.[@Rose17] We therefore consider the effective action $$\begin{gathered}
\Gamma_k^{{\rm LPA}''}[\phibf,\A] = \int_\x \biggl\lbrace \half (D_\mu\phibf) \cdot Z_k(-\D^2) (D_\mu\phibf) \\ + \quarter (\partial_\mu \rho) Y_k(-\boldsymbol{\partial}^2) (\partial_\mu \rho)
+ \dfrac{1}{4} F_{\mu \nu}^a X_{1,k}(-\D^2) F_{\mu \nu}^a \\ + \dfrac{1}{4} F_{\mu \nu}^a T^a\phibf \cdot X_{2,k}(-\D^2) F_{\mu \nu}^b T^b\phibf + U_k(\rho) \biggr\rbrace
\label{lpapp2} \end{gathered}$$ with initial conditions $X_{1,\Lamb}=X_{2,\Lamb}=0$. Since the covariant derivative of a scalar is equal to its regular derivative, $Y_k$ is a function of $-\boldsymbol{\partial}^2$. The commutator $[\Amu,\Anu]$ in (\[Fmunu\]) contributes to the effective action to order $\calO(\Amu^3)$ and can be neglected when calculating the conductivity. In addition to the effective potential, the effective action now includes four functions of momentum: $Z_k(\p)$, $Y_k(\p)$, $X_{1,k}(\p)$ and $X_{2,k}(\p)$. In an LPA$'$-like approximation, one would simply neglect the momentum dependence of these functions. In the DE to second order they would be functions of $\rho$ rather than $\p$. As discussed in detail in Ref. the DE runs into difficulties due to $X_{1,k}(\p)$ and $X_{2,k}(\p)$ being singular when $\p,k\to 0$ and $k/\p\to 0$; for instance it does not enable to compute the universal conductivity at the QCP.
The functions $X_{1,k}(\p)$ and $X_{2,k}(\p)$ fully determine the vertices $\Gamma^{(1,1)a}_{j\mu}$ and $\Gamma^{(0,2)ab}_{\mu\nu}(\p,\phibf)$: \^[(1,1)a]{}\_[j]{}(,) = ip\_(T\^a)\_j Z\_k() , and $$\begin{gathered}
\Gamzdmunuab(\p,\phibf) = p_\mu p_\nu \{ - \delta_{ab} X_{1,k}(\p) \\ - (T^a\phibf)\cdot(T^b\phibf) X_{2,k}(\p) \}
+ \delta_{\mu\nu} \{ \delta_{ab} \p^2 X_{1,k}(\p) \\ + (T^a\phibf)\cdot(T^b\phibf) [Z_k(\p) + \p^2 X_{2,k}(\p) ] \} .
\label{gamdz} \end{gathered}$$ Comparing with (\[vertA\]), we find
& Z\_k() = \_[A,k]{}(), X\_[1,k]{}() = -\_[B,k]{}(),\
& X\_[2,k]{}() = -\_[C,k]{}(), \^2 X\_[1,k]{}() = |\_[B,k]{}(),\
& Z\_k()+\^2 X\_[2,k]{}() = |\_[C,k]{}()
in agreement with the Ward identities.[@Rose17] The various functions $\Psi$ and $\bar\Psi$ do not depend on $\rho$ in the LPA$''$. RG equations for $X_{1,k}(\p)$ and $X_{2,k}(\p)$ can therefore be derived from $\dk\Gamma^{(0,2)ab}_{\mu\nu}(\p,\phibf)$ (see Appendix \[app\_subsec\_floweq\]).
Using (\[gamdz\]) we finally obtain $$\begin{gathered}
K(i\wn) = - \delta_{\mu\nu} \{ \delta_{ab} \wn^2 X_{1,k}(i\wn) \\ +
(T^a\bar\phibf)\cdot (T^b\bar\phibf) [ Z_k(i\wn) + \wn^2 X_{2,k}(i\wn) ] \} \end{gathered}$$ in the quantum model. This yields \_k(i) = 2X\_[1,k]{}(i) \[sigdis\] in the disordered phase, and
\(i) =& 2{ Z\_k(i)\
& + } ,\
(i) =& 2X\_[1,k]{}(i)
\[sigord\] in the broken-symmetry phase, where $\sigQ=q^2/h$ is the quantum of conductance and we have restored $\hbar$.
Large-$N$ limit {#sec_NPRG:subsec_largeN}
---------------
Both DE[@Berges02] and BMW[@Blaizot06; @Rose15] approximation schemes are exact in the large-$N$ limit. A crucial ingredient in the derivation of this result is that the vertices, e.g. $\Gamma_{A,k}(\p,\rho)$ and $\Gamma_{B,k}(\p,\rho)$, are field dependent. Since $Z_k(\p)$, $Y_k(\p)$, etc. are field independent in the LPA$''$, we do not expect the latter to be exact in the large-$N$ limit. However, it is possible to show that i) the potential $U(\rho)$ as well as the two-point correlation functions $\chi_{\rm L,T}(\p)$ \[Eq. (\[chi\_def\])\] are correctly determined in the large-$N$ limit; and ii) the LPA$''$ is exact in the large-$N$ limit in the ordered phase, including the QCP.
To prove the above claims, we examine the flow equations (provided in Appendix \[app\_rgeq\]) in the large-$N$ limit. The proof follows closely what is done in Refs. to solve the (similar) BMW equations in the large-$N$ limit. As the action $\Gamma_k[\phibf]$ and the field $\phibf$ respectively scale like $N$ and $\sqrt{N}$ one deduces that $W_k(\rho)=U'_k(\rho)$, $Z_k(\p)$ and the propagators ${G_{\mathrm{L},\mathrm{T},k}}(\p,\rho)$ are ${\mathcal{O}}(1)$ while $Y_k(\p)$ is ${\mathcal{O}}(1/N)$. Thus $$\partial_k Z_k(\p) = {\mathcal{O}}(1/N)$$ and $Z_k(\p)=1+{\mathcal{O}}(1/N)$. The large-$N$ transverse propagator reads $$G_{k,\rm T}^{-1}(\q,\rho)=\q^2+W_k(\rho)+R_k(\q) +{\mathcal{O}}\left (\dfrac{1}{N}\right )$$ and the flow equation of $W_k(\rho)$ reduces to $$\partial_k W_k(\rho) = \frac{N}{2} W'_k(\rho) \tilde\partial_k \int_{\mathbf{q}}G_{k,\rm T}(\q,\rho)+{\mathcal{O}}\left (\dfrac{1}{N}\right )
\label{dWk}$$ where $\tilde\partial_k=(\dk R_k)\partial_{R_k}$ acts only on the $k$ dependence of the cutoff function $R_k$. Equation (\[dWk\]) can be integrated using the change of variables $(k,\rho)\to (k,W)$ to yield the correct large-$N$ potential.[@Blaizot06] This also proves that the transverse propagator is exactly determined.
![(Top) Spectral function ${\chi_{\mathrm{L}}}''(\omega)$ in the ordered and disordered phases for $N=1000$ (solid line), compared to the exact large-$N$ solution (symbols). In the disordered phase, the exact solution for ${\chi_{\mathrm{L}}}''(\omega)={\chi_{\mathrm{T}}}''(\omega)\sim \delta(\omega-\Delta)$ is not shown. (Bottom) Same as top panel but for the spectral function ${\chi_{s}}''(\omega)$.[]{data-label="fig_largeN_chi"}](figures/chi_largeN.pdf)
We now turn to $Y_k(\p)$, or equivalently to $\Gamma_{B,k}(\p)=\Gamma_{B,k}(\p,\rho_{0,k})$ \[Eq. (\[Gamma2\])\]. One has $$\begin{aligned}
\partial_k \Gamma_{B,k}(\p) ={}& -\dfrac{N}{2} \Gamma_{B,k}(\p)^2 \tilde\partial_k \int_{\mathbf{q}}G_{k,\rm T}(\q,\rho_{0,k}) {\nonumber \\}&\times G_{k,\rm T}(\p+\q,\rho_{0,k}) + {\mathcal{O}}\left (\dfrac{1}{N^2}\right ).\label{eq:gamBlargeN}\end{aligned}$$ This agrees with the BMW equation in the case where $\Gamma_{B,k}$ does not depend on $\rho$.[@Rose15] Because of this lack of $\rho$ dependence, the change of variables $(k,\rho)\to (k,W)$ performed in the BMW equations is not possible. That difference is crucial: numerical integration of the flow equations shows that in the disordered phase $\Gamma_{B,k}(\p)$ differs from its exact value. However, in the ordered phase and at the critical point, one remarks that since $W_{k}(\rho_{0,k})=0$ for all $k$, $\tilde \partial_k G_{k,\rm T}(\q,\rho_{0,k})=\partial_k G_{k,\rm T}(\q,\rho_{0,k})$ and the rhs of becomes a total derivative. Integrating then yields the exact result. Since $Y_k(\p)$ only contributes to the longitudinal propagator in the ordered phase this means that ${\chi_{\mathrm{L}}}$ is exactly determined in the whole phase diagram, as evidenced in Fig. \[fig\_largeN\_chi\] (top) where we compare ${\chi_{\mathrm{L}}}''(\w)$ to the exact result in the limit $N\to\infty$.
A similar analysis can be performed for the two functions $f_{k}(\p)$ and $\gamma_{k}(\p)$ intervening in the scalar susceptibility. In the ordered phase the exact solution is recovered while in the disordered phase the LPA$''$ does not yield the exact result. This is illustrated in Fig. \[fig\_largeN\_chi\] (bottom) where we show the spectral function ${\chi_{s}}''(\w)$ for $N=1000$ as well as the exact result in the limit $N\to\infty$.
In the disordered phase the solution of the RG flow for the conductivity differs from the exact solution.[@Rose17a] In the ordered phase, to leading order in $1/N$, $\sigA(\w)$ is determined by $\rho_{0,k}$ and $Z_k(\p)$, which reproduce the exact solution in the large-$N$ limit. No simple analytic form has been found for the next-to-leading order contribution to $\sigA(\w)$ which depends on $X_{1,k}$ and $X_{2,k}$. $\sigB(\w)$ is determined by the function $X_{1,k}(\p)$. For $\p=0$, it is possible to integrate the flow equation of $X_{1,k}(\p=0)$, following what is done in Ref. to integrate the flow of $X_{1,k}(\rho)$ within DE, which yields the exact solution. At finite momentum, no analytic way to integrate the flow equation of $X_{1,k}(\p)$ has been found but the numerical integration of the flow equations shows an agreement with the exact solution up to numerical error.
Spectral functions {#sec_spectral}
==================
The flow equations are given in Appendix \[app\_rgeq\]. They can be solved in the usual way (see, e.g., Ref. ). Since the QCP manifests itself as a fixed point of the RG equations if we use dimensionless variables, we express all quantities in unit of the running scale $k$ (see Appendix \[app\_adim\]). The flow equations are solved numerically for several sets of initial conditions $(r_0,u_0)$. For a given value of $u_0$, the QCP can be reached by fine tuning $r_0$ to its critical value $r_{0c}$. We use $u_0\sim 50$ and $\Lamb=1$. The universal regime near the QCP can then be studied by tuning $r_0$ slightly away from $r_{c0}$. Universality of the results can be checked by changing the value of $u_0$ and the various correlation functions can be written in terms of universal scaling functions. Below we first discuss the two-point correlation function before turning to the scalar susceptibility and conductivity. We consider only the cases $N=2$ and $N=3$. When considering the two-point correlation function and scalar susceptibility we take the freedom to adjust the (nonuniversal) scale of correlation functions and spectral functions.
-------- --------- --------- --------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------- -----------------------
$1$ $0.638$ $0.631$ $0.632$ $0.63002(10)$ [@Hasenbusch10] $0.6306(5)$ [@Pogorelov08] $0.629971(4)$[@Kos16]
$2$ $0.668$ $0.679$ $0.673$ $0.6717(1)$[@Campostrini06] $0.6700(6)$[@Pogorelov08] $0.67191(12)$[@Kos16]
$3$ $0.706$ $0.725$ $0.714$ $0.7112(5)$[@Campostrini02] $0.7060(7)$[@Pogorelov08] $0.7121(28)$[@Kos16]
$4$ $0.741$ $0.765$ $0.754$ $0.749(2)$[@Hasenbusch01] $0.741(6)$[@Guida98]
$5$ $0.774$ $0.799$ $0.787$ $0.766$[@Antonenko95]
$6$ $0.803$ $0.836$ $0.816$ $0.790$[@Antonenko95]
$8$ $0.848$ $0.866$ $0.860$ $0.830$[@Antonenko95]
$10$ $0.879$ $0.892$ $0.893$ $0.859$[@Antonenko95]
$100$ $0.989$ $0.990$ $0.990$ $0.989$[@Moshe03]
$1000$ $0.999$ $0.999$ $0.999$ $0.999$[@Moshe03]
-------- --------- --------- --------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------- -----------------------
: Same as \[table\_nu\] but for the anomalous dimension $\eta$.
\[table\_nu\]
-------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------------------------ --------------------------- -----------------------
$1$ $0.0443$ $0.0506$ $0.0411$ $0.03627(10)$[@Hasenbusch10] $0.0318(3)$[@Pogorelov08] $0.036298(2)$[@Kos16]
$2$ $0.0467$ $0.0491$ $0.0423$ $0.0381(2)$[@Campostrini06] $0.0334(2)$[@Pogorelov08] $0.03852(64)$[@Kos16]
$3$ $0.0463$ $0.0459$ $0.0411$ $0.0375(5)$[@Campostrini02] $0.0333(3)$[@Pogorelov08] $0.0385(11)$[@Kos16]
$4$ $0.0443$ $0.0420$ $0.0386$ $0.0365(10)$[@Hasenbusch01] $0.0350(45)$[@Guida98]
$5$ $0.0413$ $0.0382$ $0.0354$ $0.034$[@Antonenko95]
$6$ $0.0381$ $0.0346$ $0.0321$ $0.031$[@Antonenko95]
$8$ $0.0319$ $0.0287$ $0.0264$ $0.027$[@Antonenko95]
$10$ $0.0270$ $0.0243$ $0.0220$ $0.024$[@Antonenko95]
$100$ $0.00296$ $0.00289$ $0.00233$ $0.0027$[@Moshe03]
$1000$ $0.000296$ $0.000293$ $0.000233$ $0.00027$[@Moshe03]
-------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------------------------ --------------------------- -----------------------
: Same as \[table\_nu\] but for the anomalous dimension $\eta$.
\[table\_eta\]
Two-point correlation function {#subsec_spectral_chi}
------------------------------
In the universal regime near the QCP, the two-point correlation function $\chi_{\alpha=\rm L,T}$ \[Eq. (\[chi\_def\])\] and its spectral function satisfy the scaling forms[@Sachdev_book] $$\begin{split}
\chi_\alpha(\p) &= Z_{\alpha,\pm} \Delta^{\eta-2} \tilde\Phi_{\alpha,\pm} \left( \frac{|\p|}{\Delta} \right) , \\
\chi''_\alpha(\w) & = {\rm Im}[\chi^R_\alpha(\w)] = Z_{\alpha,\pm} \Delta^{\eta-2} \Phi_{\alpha,\pm} \left( \frac{\w}{\Delta} \right) ,
\end{split}
\label{chiLT_scaling}$$ where $\eta$ is the anomalous dimension of the $\varphibf$ field at the QCP. Recall that $\chi^R(\w)=\chi(|\p|\to -i\w+0^+)$ is the retarded susceptibility. $\tilde\Phi_{\alpha,\pm}$ and $\Phi_{\alpha,\pm}$ are universal scaling functions and $Z_{\alpha,\pm}$ a nonuniversal constant with dimension of (length)$^\eta$. The index $+/-$ refers to the disordered and ordered phases, respectively. $\Delta$ is a characteristic energy scale given by the excitation gap in the disordered phase. In the ordered phase, we take $\Delta$ to be the excitation gap in the disordered phase at the point located symmetrically wrt the QCP (i.e. corresponding to the same value of $|r_0-r_{0c}|$). Since $\Delta$ vanishes at the QCP, Eqs. (\[chiLT\_scaling\]) imply $\chi_\alpha(\p)\sim |\p|^{\eta-2}$ and $\chi''_\alpha(\w)\sim|\w|^{\eta-2}$ when $r_0=r_{0c}$. Since $\chi''_{\rm L}(\w)$ and $\chi''_{\rm T}(\w)$ are odd in $\w$ we shall only consider the case $\w\geq 0$ in the following.
### QCP {#subsubsec_spectral_chi_qcp}
At the QCP the anomalous dimension $\eta$ is given by the value of the running anomalous dimension $\eta_{k}=-k\dk\ln Z_k(\p=0)$ reached when $k\to 0$. The correlation-length-exponent $\nu$ can be obtained from the runaway flow from the fixed point when the system is not exactly at criticality (which, in practice, is always the case), e.g., $\trho_{0,k}\simeq \trho^*_0+ \const\times (\Lambda/k)^{1/\nu}$ ($\trho_0$ is the dimensionless field variable, see Appendix \[app\_adim\], and $\trho^*_0$ its fixed-point value). Results obtained for various values of $N$ are shown in Tables \[table\_nu\] and \[table\_eta\] where we compare the LPA$''$ to other methods. The LPA$''$ provides us with satisfying values for the critical exponent $\nu$ (within 2% of the conformal bootstrap results for $N=1,2,3$) but is less accurate, and significantly less reliable than the DE and BMW approximations, for the anomalous dimension.
We thus conclude that, when improving the approximation scheme starting from the LPA$'$, it is more efficient to include the full field dependence (as in DE) than the full momentum dependence (as in LPA$''$) of $Z_k$ and $Y_k$. Naive power counting near four dimensions shows that indeed the field dependence is more important than the momentum dependence so that, at least near four dimensions, the superiority of DE over LPA$''$ in estimating the anomalous dimension should not come as a surprise. We note however that any field truncation in DE is likely to strongly deteriorate the estimate of $\eta$ below the accuracy of LPA$''$. It is therefore natural to ascribe the lack of accuracy of the LPA$''$ to the neglect of diagrams involving the momentum dependence of $\Gamma^{(3)}$ or $\Gamma^{(4)}$.[^5] In any case the anomalous dimension is small for the three-dimensional O($N$) model and an accurate estimate is not crucial when focusing on the full momentum dependence (which is not dominated by $\eta$ on a typical scale fixed by $\Delta$).
The momentum dependence of $\chi_{\rm L,T}(\p)$ at criticality is shown in Fig. \[fig\_chiLT\_QCP\]. At small momentum, below the Ginzburg momentum scale $p_G\sim u_0/24\pi\sim \Lambda/2$, $\chi_{\rm L,T}(\p)\sim |\p|^{-2+\eta}$ in agreement with the expected result (\[Glpapp\_qcp\]). The value of the exponent $\eta$ is the same as that obtained from the running anomalous dimension $\eta_k$.
### Disordered phase
The two-point correlation function $\chi_{\rm L,T}(\p)$ in the disordered phase is shown in Fig. \[fig\_deso\_compa\_chiLT\] for $N=2$ and $N=3$. (More precisely we show the universal scaling function $\tilde\Phi_{\alpha,+}(|\p|/\Delta)$.) The spectral function $\chi''_{\rm L,T}(\w)$, obtained from a numerical analytic continuation using Padé approximants, consists of a narrow peak at an energy which is very well approximated by (\[Delta\]). The results are in very good agreement with the BMW results from Ref. . Recall that when comparing LPA$''$ and BMW we take the freedom to adjust the (nonuniversal) relative scale.
-------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------------------- --------------------------
$2$ $0.207$ $0.195$ $0.193$ $0.220$ [@Gazit13a] $0.17(2)$ [@Nishiyama17]
$3$ $0.147$ $0.140$ $0.137$ $0.114$ [@Gazit13a]
$4$ $0.118$ $0.115$ $0.111$
$6$ $0.0935$ $0.0947$ $0.0903$
$8$ $0.0846$ $0.0876$ $0.0829$
$10$ $0.0810$ $0.0844$ $0.0803$
$1000$ $0.0795$ $0.0798$ $0.0796$
-------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------------------- --------------------------
: Universal ratio ${\rho_{s}}/N\Delta$ obtained in the NPRG approach from DE, LPA$''$ and BMW (results from the authors) compared to Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and exact diagonalization (ED). The exact result in the large-$N$ limit is $1/4\pi\simeq 0.0796$.
\[table\_rhos\]
### Ordered phase
The ordered phase is characterized by the stiffness ${\rho_{s}}$ \[Eq. (\[rhos\_def1\])\]. The ratio ${\rho_{s}}/N\Delta$, where $\Delta$ is the excitation gap in the disordered phase at the point located symmetrically wrt the QCP (i.e. corresponding to the same value of $|r_0-r_{0c}|$) is a universal number equal to $1/4\pi$ in the large-$N$ limit. When $2\leq N\leq 4$, the LPA$''$ value of this ratio is between the results obtained from DE and BMW approximation, and in reasonable agreement with Monte Carlo simulations for $N=2$ and $3$ (Table \[table\_rhos\]). For $N>4$ the LPA$''$ starts to deviate from DE and BMW but is nevertheless exact in the large-$N$ limit.
The longitudinal correlation function $\chi_{\rm L}(\p)$ in the ordered phase is shown in Fig. \[fig\_ordo\_compa\_chil\] for $N=2$ and $N=3$. Again there is a very good agreement with the BMW result from Ref. . The spectral function $\chi''_{\rm L}(\w)$ is also very similar in the two approaches: it shows a $1/\w$ divergence at low energies due to the coupling of longitudinal fluctuations to transverse ones[@Patasinskij73; @Sachdev99; @Zwerger04; @Dupuis11] (Fig. \[fig\_ordo\_chil\_loglog\]) and a broad peak around $\w=\Delta$ for $N=2$ (for $N=3$ the peak has disappeared but a faint structure can still be seen), presumably due the Higgs mode.[@Rose15]
Scalar susceptibility {#scalar-susceptibility-1}
---------------------
In the universal regime near the QCP,[@Podolsky12] $$\begin{split}
{\chi_{s}}(\p) &= \calB_\pm + \calA_\pm \Delta^{3-2/\nu} \tilde\Phi_{s,\pm}\left(\frac{|\p|}{\Delta}\right) , \\
{\chi_{s}}''(\w) &= {\rm Im}[ {\chi_{s}}^R(\w) ] = \calA_\pm \Delta^{3-2/\nu} \Phi_{s,\pm}\left(\frac{\w}{\Delta}\right) ,
\end{split}
\label{chis_scaling}$$ where $\tilde\Phi_{s,\pm}$ and $\Phi_{s,\pm}$ are universal scaling functions and $\calA_\pm,\calB_\pm$ nonuniversal constants. At the QCP ($\Delta=0$), ${\chi_{s}}(\p)-{\chi_{s}}(0)\sim |\p|^{3-2/\nu}$ and $\chi''_s(\w)\sim |\w|^{3-2/\nu}$. Since ${\chi_{s}}''(\w)$ is an odd function of $\w$, we shall only consider the case $\w>0$ in the following.
-------- --------- --------- --------------- -- -- --
$2$ $0.679$ $0.639$ $0.67191(12)$
$3$ $0.725$ $0.682$ $0.7121(28)$
$4$ $0.765$ $0.722$
$5$ $0.799$ $0.756$
$6$ $0.836$ $0.784$
$8$ $0.866$ $0.827$
$10$ $0.892$ $0.856$
$100$ $0.990$ $0.984$
$1000$ $0.999$ $0.998$
-------- --------- --------- --------------- -- -- --
: Universal conductivity $\sig^*/\sigQ$ at the QCP, obtained with a regulator parameter value $\alpha=2.25$ \[Eq. (\[Rkdef\])\], compared to results obtained from quantum Monte Carlo simulations[@Witczak14; @Chen14; @Gazit13a; @Katz14; @Gazit14] (QMC) and conformal bootstrap[@Kos15] (CB). The exact value for $N\to \infty$ is $\pi/8\simeq 0.3927$.
\[table\_nu\_chis\]
$N$ NPRG QMC CB
------ -------- ------------- -----------
2 0.3218 0.355-0.361 0.3554(6)
3 0.3285
4 0.3350
10 0.3599
1000 0.3927
: Universal conductivity $\sig^*/\sigQ$ at the QCP, obtained with a regulator parameter value $\alpha=2.25$ \[Eq. (\[Rkdef\])\], compared to results obtained from quantum Monte Carlo simulations[@Witczak14; @Chen14; @Gazit13a; @Katz14; @Gazit14] (QMC) and conformal bootstrap[@Kos15] (CB). The exact value for $N\to \infty$ is $\pi/8\simeq 0.3927$.
\[table\_sigQCP\]
### QCP {#subsubsec_spectral_chis_qcp}
The scalar susceptibility ${\chi_{s}}(\p)-{\chi_{s}}(0)\sim|\p|^{3-2/\nu}$ at criticality is shown in Fig. \[fig\_chis\_QCP\]. The momentum dependence provides us with an alternative computation of the critical exponent $\nu$ (Table \[table\_nu\_chis\]). The results are significantly less accurate than those obtained from $\rho_{0,k}$ (Sec. \[subsec\_spectral\_chi\]) but improve over the results of Ref. .
### Disordered phase
Figure \[fig\_deso\_compa\_chis\] shows that the scalar susceptibility ${\chi_{s}}(\p)$ obtained in the LPA$''$ is in nearly perfect agreement with the BMW result.[@Rose15] Yet the spectral functions ${\chi_{s}}''(\w)$ differ, the energy gap $2\Delta$ being not as sharply defined in the LPA$''$. The difference reflects the difficulty to obtain a gapped spectral function $\chi''(\w)\propto\Theta(\w-2\Delta)$ with Padé approximants.
### Ordered phase
In the ordered phase, although the agreement between LPA$''$ and BMW for ${\chi_{s}}(\p)$ is not perfect, the LPA$''$ spectral function ${\chi_{s}}''(\w)$ compares fairly well with the BMW one (Fig. \[fig\_ordo\_compa\_chis\]). In particular, for $N=2$ we clearly observe a Higgs resonance at $\w_H\simeq 1.95\Delta$, to be compared with $\w_H\simeq 2.2\Delta$ in the BMW approach.[@Rose15] For $N=3$ a broadened resonance around $\w_H\simeq2.2\Delta$ ($\w_H\simeq 2.7\Delta$ with BMW) is still visible (the resonance is suppressed for higher values of $N$). At low frequencies our results are compatible with the expected $\w^3$ behavior (Fig. \[fig\_ordo\_chis\_loglog\]).
Conductivity {#conductivity-1}
------------
In the critical regime the conductivity tensor satisfies the scaling form [@Fisher90; @Damle97] $$\begin{split}
\sig(\w) & = \sig_Q \Sig_+\left( \frac{\w}{\Delta}\right) , \\
\sig_{A,B}(\w) & = \sig_Q \Sig_-^{A,B}\left( \frac{\w}{\Delta}\right) ,
\end{split}
\label{sigscaling}$$ where $\Sig_\pm$ is a universal scaling function and $\sigQ$ the quantum of conductance. As the conductivity is dimensionless in two space dimensions there is no nonuniversal prefactor, unlike ${\chi_{\mathrm{L},\mathrm{T}}}$ and ${\chi_{s}}$.
### QCP {#qcp}
At the QCP, the universal scaling functions reach a nonzero limit $\Sig_\pm(\infty)$ and the ratio $\sig(\w=0)/\sig_Q=\sig^*/\sig_Q=\Sig_\pm(\infty)$ is universal,[@Fisher90] equal to $\pi/8$ in the large-$N$ limit.[@Sachdev_book] The LPA$''$ recovers the exact result in the large-$N$ limit. For $N=2$, it gives a value in reasonable agreement with (although 10% smaller than) results from QMC[@Witczak14; @Chen14; @Gazit13a; @Katz14; @Gazit14] and conformal bootstrap[@Kos15] (Table \[table\_sigQCP\]).
### Disordered phase
![ Conductivity $\sigma(\w)$ in the disordered and ordered phases for $N=2$ and $3$. The real and imaginary parts are respectively plotted left and right. Top: $\sigma(\w)$ in the disordered phase. Middle: $\sigA(\w)$ in the ordered phase with the superfluid contribution subtracted. Bottom: $\sigB(\w)$ in the ordered phase. For $N=2$, $\sigB(\w)$ is not defined (see Sec. \[sec\_NPRG:subsubsec\_cond\]). []{data-label="fig_AllSig"}](figures/AllSig.pdf)
The conductivity $\sigma(\w)$ in the disordered phase is shown in Fig. \[fig\_AllSig\] (top panel). The system is insulating and the real part of $\sig(\w)$ vanishes below an energy gap $2\Delta$. The imaginary part varies linearly for $\w\ll\Delta$, i.e. $\sigma(\w)\simeq -i\Cdis\w$; the system behaves as a perfect capacitor at low energies with capacitance (per unit area) $\Cdis=2\pi\hbar\sig_Q X_{1,k=0}(\wn=0)$. The ratio $\hbar\sig_Q/2\pi\Cdis\Delta$ is universal. The LPA$''$ value is in good agreement with the results of DE,[@Rose17] Monte Carlo simulations[@Gazit14] and exact diagonalization.[@Nishiyama17]
For large $N$, there is a discrepancy between the exact solution and our computation which has been noted in Sec. \[sec\_NPRG:subsec\_largeN\] for the two-point correlation function and the scalar susceptibility in the disordered phase. Furthermore the analytic continuation is made difficult by the singularity at $\w=2\Delta$ so that the frequency dependence of $\sig(\w)$ above $2\Delta$ should be taken with caution.
### Ordered phase
------------------------- -------- -------- --------------------- ------------------------- ---------- ----------
(lr)[2-5]{} (lr)[6-7]{}
$2$ $1.98$ $2.00$ $2.1(1)$ [@Gazit14] $2.0(4)$ [@Nishiyama17] $0.105$ $0.0975$
$3$ $1.98$ $1.98$ $0.0742$ $0.0706$
$4$ $1.98$ $1.96$ $0.0598$ $0.0587$
$5$ $1.97$ $1.94$ $0.0520$ $0.0526$
$6$ $1.97$ $1.92$ $0.0475$ $0.0493$
$8$ $1.96$ $1.90$ $0.0431$ $0.0461$
$10$ $1.96$ $1.88$ $0.0415$ $0.0448$
$100$ $1.92$ $1.80$ $0.0413$ $0.0443$
$1000$ $1.91$ $1.79$ $0.0416$ $0.0446$
------------------------- -------- -------- --------------------- ------------------------- ---------- ----------
: Ratios $\hbar\sig_Q/2\pi \Cdis\Delta$ and $\Cdis/N\Lord\sig_Q^2$ obtained from the NPRG approach, compared to Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and exact diagonalization (ED). The exact results for $N\to\infty$ are $6/\pi\simeq 1.90986$ and $1/24\simeq 0.041667$, respectively.
\[tab:cond\_CoverL\]
In the ordered phase, the conductivity tensor is defined by two independent elements, $\sigA(\w)$ and $\sigB(\w)$ \[Eqs. (\[sigord\])\]. The large-$N$ limit is exact. At low energies the system behaves as a superfluid or a perfect inductor, $\sigA(\w)\simeq i/\Lord(\w+i0^+)$, with inductance $\Lord=\hbar/2\pi\sig_Q{\rho_{s}}$. The ratio $\Cdis/N\Lord\sig^2_Q$ is universal (Table \[tab:cond\_CoverL\]).
$\sigA(\w)$, with the superfluid contribution $i/\Lord(\w+i0^+)$ subtracted, is shown in Fig. \[fig\_AllSig\] (middle panel). Our results seem to indicate the absence of a constant $\calO(\wn^0)$ term in agreement with the predictions of perturbation theory.[@Podolsky11] Furthermore we see a marked difference in the low-frequency behavior of the real part of the conductivity between the cases $N=2$ and $N\neq 2$, but our numerical results are not precise enough to resolve the low-frequency power laws (predicted[@Podolsky11] to be $\w$ and $\w^5$ for $N\neq 2$ and $N=2$, respectively). On the other hand we find that $\sigB(\w)$ reaches a nonzero universal value $\sigB^*$ in the limit $\w\to 0$ (Fig. \[fig\_AllSig\], bottom panel). Contrary to $\sig^*$, $\sigB^*$ turns out to be $N$ independent: the relative change in $\sigB^*$ is less than $10^{-6}$ when $N$ varies. Noting that the obtained value $\sigB^*/\sigQ\simeq 0.3927$ is equal to the large-$N$ result[@Rose17; @Lucas17] $\pi/8$ within numerical precision, we have conjectured that $\sigB^*/\sigQ=\pi/8$ for all values of $N$.[@Rose17a]
Conclusion
==========
We have presented an approximation scheme of the NPRG flow equations, the LPA$''$, that preserves the momentum dependence of correlation functions. As a test-bed we have considered the two-dimensional quantum O($N$) model. In the zero-temperature limit considered in the paper, this model is equivalent to the classical three-dimensional O($N$) model. Spectral functions of the two-dimensional quantum model can be obtained from an analytic continuation $|\p|\to -i\w+0^+$ using Padé approximants. The LPA$''$ requires to solve coupled equations for the effective potential $U_k(\rho)$ and the momentum-dependent functions $Z_k(\p)$ and $Y_k(\p)$ that define the two-point vertex. To obtain the scalar susceptibility ${\chi_{s}}$ or the conductivity $\sigma$, additional equations for $f_k(\p)$ and $\gamma_k(\p)$ (for ${\chi_{s}}$), or $X_{1,k}(\p)$ and $X_{2,k}(\p)$ (for $\sigma$), must be considered. The fact that these functions depend only on momentum (and not also the field variable $\rho$) makes the approach relatively easy to implement numerically.
We have made a detailed comparison of the results obtained within the LPA$''$ to those obtained from the DE or BMW approximation schemes. Overall the LPA$''$ remains relatively precise given its simplicity. The value of the critical exponent $\nu$ is nearly as accurate (at least for $N\leq 3$) as with DE or BMW but the anomalous dimension is less precise. As for the universal ratio ${\rho_{s}}/\Delta$ between stiffness and excitation gap, the LPA$''$ result is very close to the BMW one. The universal scaling functions of various correlation functions (two-point correlation function, scalar susceptibility and conductivity) also compare satisfactorily with the BMW results thus showing the ability of the LPA$''$ to reliably compute the momentum dependence. Indeed LPA$''$ and BMW show good qualitative agreement with some quantitative discrepancy. For instance in the LPA$''$ the Higgs resonance energy $\w_H/\Delta$ is equal to 1.95 and 2.2 for $N=2$ and 3, respectively, whereas BMW gives 2.2 and 2.7. A weakness of the LPA$''$ though is its inability to reproduce the large-$N$ limit in the disordered phase (i.e. when there is a gap in the spectrum).
The LPA$''$ is particularly successful in computing the zero-temperature conductivity. In the presence of an external non-Abelian gauge field $\Amu$, it is not clear how to implement the BMW scheme in a gauge-invariant way. On the other hand DE breaks down at low energies due to some vertices being singular functions of momentum. In contrast the LPA$''$ allows us to obtain the full frequency dependence of the conductivity at the QCP and in the disordered and ordered phases. The value of the universal conductivity $\sig(\w\to 0)=\sig^*$ at the QCP is within 10% of the conformal bootstrap result. An important result obtained by the LPA$''$ is the superuniversality of one of the elements of the conductivity tensor, $\sigB^*/\sig_Q=\pi/8$, in the ordered phase.[@Rose17a]
Finally we would like to point out that the LPA$''$ might offer the possibility to avoid the analytic continuation of numerical data using Padé approximants (or alternative methods). Indeed, by approximating the propagators in the internal loops of the flow equations by their LPA$'$ expressions, it becomes possible to perform exactly both Matsubara-frequency sums and analytic continuation to real frequencies,[@Kamikado14; @Tripolt14; @Tripolt14a; @Wambach14; @Pawlowski15; @Cyrol18; @Pawlowski17] which would allow to obtain the frequency dependence of correlation functions in the hydrodynamic regime $|\w|\lesssim T$.
RG equations in the LPA$''$ {#app_rgeq}
===========================
In this Appendix, we provide some technical details regarding the LPA$''$. Flow equations for the vertices are obtained by taking functional derivatives of Eqs. (\[Weteq\]), (\[Weteq\_h\]) and (\[Weteq\_A\]). Replacing the vertices by their LPA$''$ expressions, we derive equations for the various functions of interest: $W_k(\rho)=U'_k(\rho)$, $Z_k(\p)$, $Y_k(\p)$, $f_k(\p)$, $\gamma_k(\p)$, $X_{1,k}(\p)$ and $X_{2,k}(\p)$. To alleviate the notations in the following we do not write explicitly the $k$ index and $\rho$-dependence of the functions.
Vertices
--------
In this section we list all vertices that enter the flow equations (besides those already considered in the text). We do not write the Kronecker symbol expressing the conservation of total momentum and set the volume equal to unity. All vertices are evaluated in a uniform field configuration and we use the notation $W'=\partial_\rho W$, etc. $\perm(1,\cdots,n)$ denotes all (different) terms obtained by permutation of $(\p_1,i_1;\cdots;\p_n,i_n)$.
### Two-point correlation function {#two-point-correlation-function-1}
The vertices entering the flow equation $\dk\Gamma^{(2)}$ are $$\begin{aligned}
\Gamma_{i_1 i_2 i_3}^{(3,0)}({\mathbf{p}}_1,{\mathbf{p}}_2,{\mathbf{p}}_3) ={}&\dfrac{1}{2} Y({\mathbf{p}}_1)\p_1^2 \delta_{i_2i_3}\phi_{i_1} +W' \delta_{i_1 i_2}\phi_{i_3} +W'' \phi_{i_1}\phi_{i_2}\phi_{i_3} + \perm(1,2,3), \\
\Gamma_{i_1i_2i_3i_4}^{(4,0)}({\mathbf{p}}_1,{\mathbf{p}}_2,{\mathbf{p}}_3,{\mathbf{p}}_4)={}&\dfrac{1}{2}Y({\mathbf{p}}_1+{\mathbf{p}}_2)({\mathbf{p}}_1+{\mathbf{p}}_2)^2 \delta_{i_1 i_2}\delta_{i_3i_4} {\nonumber \\}&{}+{} W'\delta_{i_1i_2}\delta_{i_3i_4}{}+W'' \phi_{i_1}\phi_{i_2}\delta_{i_3i_4} +W''' \phi_{i_1}\phi_{i_2}\phi_{i_3}\phi_{i_4} + \perm(1,2,3,4).
\label{vert3}\end{aligned}$$
### Scalar susceptibility {#scalar-susceptibility-2}
In the calculation of the scalar susceptibility, $$\begin{aligned}
\Gamma_{i_1 i_2}^{(2,1)}({\mathbf{p}}_1,{\mathbf{p}}_2,{\mathbf{p}}_3) &= \delta_{i_1 i_2} f({\mathbf{p}}_3), \\
\Gamma^{(3,1)}_{i_1 i_2 i_3}({\mathbf{p}}_1,{\mathbf{p}}_2,{\mathbf{p}}_3,{\mathbf{p}}_4) &= \Gamma^{(2,2)}_{i_1 i_2}({\mathbf{p}}_1,{\mathbf{p}}_2,{\mathbf{p}}_3,{\mathbf{p}}_4)=0.\end{aligned}$$
### Conductivity {#conductivity-2}
In the calculation of the conductivity, $$\begin{aligned}
\Gamma_{i_1 i_2,\mu}^{(2,1)a}({\mathbf{p}}_1,{\mathbf{p}}_2,{\mathbf{p}}_3)={}&i [p_{1,\mu}Z({\mathbf{p}}_1)-p_{2,\mu}Z({\mathbf{p}}_2) - (p_{1,\mu}-p_{2,\mu}) {\mathbf{p}}_1\cdot{\mathbf{p}}_2 D_1[Z]({\mathbf{p}}_1,{\mathbf{p}}_2) ] T^a_{i_1 i_2}, \label{eq:vert_21_cond}
\\
\Gamma_{i_1 i_2 i_3,\mu}^{(3,1)a}({\mathbf{p}}_1,{\mathbf{p}}_2,{\mathbf{p}}_3,{\mathbf{p}}_4)={}&0,
\\
\Gamma_{i_1 i_2, \mu \nu}^{(2,2)ab}({\mathbf{p}}_1,{\mathbf{p}}_2,{\mathbf{p}}_3,{\mathbf{p}}_4)={}& [(T^aT^b)_{i_1 i_2} X_2({\mathbf{p}}_1+{\mathbf{p}}_3)+(T^aT^b)_{i_2 i_1} X_2({\mathbf{p}}_1+{\mathbf{p}}_4) ] ( {\mathbf{p}}_3\cdot {\mathbf{p}}_4 \delta_{\mu \nu}-p_{3,\nu} p_{4,\mu} ) {\nonumber \\}{}&{}
- \delta_{\mu\nu} [ (T^aT^b)_{i_1 i_2}Z({\mathbf{p}}_1+{\mathbf{p}}_3)+(T^bT^a)_{i_1 i_2}Z({\mathbf{p}}_1+{\mathbf{p}}_4)-\{T^a,T^b\}_{i_1 i_2}D_1[Z]({\mathbf{p}}_1,{\mathbf{p}}_2) ] {\nonumber \\}&-(2p_{1,\mu}+p_{3,\mu})p_{1,\nu}(T^aT^b)_{i_1 i_2}D_1[Z]({\mathbf{p}}_1,{\mathbf{p}}_1+{\mathbf{p}}_3)+\text{perm(}(1,2)\text{ or }(3,4)\text{)}{\nonumber \\}&-\dfrac{1}{2}{\mathbf{p}}_1\cdot {\mathbf{p}}_2 (2p_{1,\mu}+p_{3,\mu})(2p_{2,\nu}+p_{4,\nu})(T^aT^b)_{i_1 i_2}D_2[Z]({\mathbf{p}}_1,{\mathbf{p}}_2,{\mathbf{p}}_1+{\mathbf{p}}_3)+\text{perm}(3,4). \label{eq:vert_22_cond}\end{aligned}$$ In Eqs. and we have introduced “discrete derivatives” defined by $$\begin{aligned}
D_1 [f]({\mathbf{p}}_1,{\mathbf{p}}_2)& =\dfrac{f({\mathbf{p}}_1)-f({\mathbf{p}}_2)}{{\mathbf{p}}_1^2-{\mathbf{p}}_2^2},\\
D_2 [f]({\mathbf{p}}_1,{\mathbf{p}}_2,{\mathbf{p}}_3)& =2\dfrac{f({\mathbf{p}}_1)({\mathbf{p}}_2^2-{\mathbf{p}}_3^2)+f({\mathbf{p}}_2)({\mathbf{p}}_3^2-{\mathbf{p}}_1^2)+f({\mathbf{p}}_3)({\mathbf{p}}_1^2-{\mathbf{p}}_2^2)}{({\mathbf{p}}_2^2-{\mathbf{p}}_1^2)({\mathbf{p}}_3^2-{\mathbf{p}}_2^2)({\mathbf{p}}_1^2-{\mathbf{p}}_3^2)},\end{aligned}$$ and verifying $$\begin{aligned}
D_1 [f]({\mathbf{p}},{\mathbf{p}})={}&\partial_{{\mathbf{p}}^2}f({\mathbf{p}}),\\
D_2 [f]({\mathbf{p}},{\mathbf{p}},{\mathbf{p}}')={}&2\dfrac{f({\mathbf{p}})-f({\mathbf{p}}')-({\mathbf{p}}^2-{\mathbf{p}}'^2)\partial_{{\mathbf{p}}^2}f({\mathbf{p}})}{({\mathbf{p}}^2-{\mathbf{p}}'^2)^2},\\
D_2 [f]({\mathbf{p}},{\mathbf{p}},{\mathbf{p}})={}&\partial_{{\mathbf{p}}^2}^2f({\mathbf{p}}).\end{aligned}$$
Flow equations {#app_subsec_floweq}
--------------
### Two-point correlation function {#two-point-correlation-function-2}
Restoring the $\rho$ dependence of the functions, one has $$\begin{aligned}
\partial_k W (\rho) ={}& \tilde{\partial}_k \frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathbf{q}}\Big\{ {G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}},\rho) \big[{\mathbf{q}}^2 Y({\mathbf{q}}^2)+2 \rho W''(\rho)+3 W'(\rho)\big]+(N-1) W'(\rho) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}},\rho) \Big\} ,\end{aligned}$$ where $\tilde{\partial}_k=(\dk R_k)\partial_{R_k}$ acts only on the $k$ dependence of the cutoff function $R_k$. Through the remainder of this Appendix all $\rho$-dependent quantities (the propagators, the potential and its derivatives and $\rho$ itself) are evaluated at the running minimum of the potential $\rho_{0,k}$. $$\begin{aligned}
\partial_k Z (\p) ={}& \tilde{\partial}_k \frac{1}{4} \int_{\mathbf{q}}\Big\{ {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}}) \big[2 \rho {G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}}) ({\mathbf{q}}^2 Y({\mathbf{q}})+2 W')^2 -\rho {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}^2) (2 W'+{{\boldsymbol \xi}}^2 Y({{\boldsymbol \xi}}))^2-2 {\mathbf{q}}^2 Y({\mathbf{q}})+2 {{\boldsymbol \xi}}^2 Y({{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big]{\nonumber \\}&{}-\rho
{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) ({\mathbf{q}}^2 Y({\mathbf{q}})+2 W')^2\Big\},\\
\partial_k Y (\p) ={}& \tilde{\partial}_k \frac{1}{4 \rho {\mathbf{p}}^2} \int_{\mathbf{q}}\Big\{ \rho \Big[4 W' \big(3 {G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}}) \big[4 \rho W'' {G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})-{G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) ({\mathbf{p}}^2
Y({\mathbf{p}})+4 \rho W'')\big]-(N-1) {\mathbf{p}}^2 Y({\mathbf{p}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big)
{\nonumber \\}&{}
+4
(W')^2 \Big[{G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}}) \big({G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})+(N-1) \big[{G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})-{G_\mathrm{T}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big]\big)
{\nonumber \\}&{}
+{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}}) [-9 {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})-2 {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})+{G_\mathrm{T}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})]+9
{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}}){}^2\Big]
{\nonumber \\}&{}
+{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}}) \big[16 \rho ^2 (W'')^2 {G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})-{G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})
({\mathbf{p}}^2 Y({\mathbf{p}})+4 \rho W'')^2\big]-(N-1) {\mathbf{p}}^4 Y({\mathbf{p}})^2 {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})\Big]
{\nonumber \\}& -2 {\mathbf{q}}^2 Y({\mathbf{q}}) \Big({G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}}) \Big[\rho \big({G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) \big[{\mathbf{p}}^2
Y({\mathbf{p}})+4 \rho W''+{{\boldsymbol \xi}}^2 Y({{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big]
{\nonumber \\}&
{}-2 W' \big[-3 {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})+6 {G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})-2
{G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})+{G_\mathrm{T}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big]-8 \rho W'' {G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})\big)+1\Big]-{G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})\Big)
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+2 {{\boldsymbol \xi}}^2
Y({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) \Big[{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}}) \big(1-\rho {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) \big[{\mathbf{p}}^2 Y({\mathbf{p}})+4 \rho W''+6
W'\big]\big)+{G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}}) \big[2 \rho W' {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})-1\big] \Big]
{\nonumber \\}&
{}
+{{\boldsymbol \xi}}^4 \rho Y({{\boldsymbol \xi}})^2
{G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) \big[{G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})-{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})\big]+\rho {\mathbf{q}}^4 Y({\mathbf{q}})^2 {G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})
\big[-{G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})+4 {G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})-2 {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})+{G_\mathrm{T}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big]\Big\}.\end{aligned}$$ where for the sake of concision we have defined ${{\boldsymbol \xi}}={\mathbf{p}}+{\mathbf{q}}$ and for all vectors ${\mathbf{q}}^4=|{\mathbf{q}}|^4$.
### Scalar susceptibility {#scalar-susceptibility-3}
$$\begin{aligned}
\partial_k f (\p) ={}& \tilde{\partial}_k \frac{1}{4} f({\mathbf{p}}) \int_{\mathbf{q}}\big\{- {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}}) \big[{\mathbf{p}}^2 Y({\mathbf{p}})+{\mathbf{q}}^2
Y({\mathbf{q}})+4 \rho W''+6 W'+{{\boldsymbol \xi}}^2 Y({{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big]{\nonumber \\}&{}-(N-1) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) ({\mathbf{p}}^2 Y({\mathbf{p}})+2 W') \big\},\\
\partial_k \gamma (\p) ={}& -\tilde\partial_k\frac{1}{2} f({\mathbf{p}})^2 \int_{\mathbf{q}}\big\{{G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})+(N-1) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) \big\}.\end{aligned}$$
### Conductivity {#conductivity-3}
$$\begin{aligned}
\partial_k X_1 (\p) ={}& \frac{1}{(D-1) {\mathbf{p}}^4} \tilde\partial_k \int_{\mathbf{q}}\Big\{ {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}}) \Big({\mathbf{p}}^2 \Big[2 {\mathbf{q}}^2 \big( (D-1) D_1[Z]({\mathbf{q}},{\mathbf{q}})+2 \big[2 D_1[Z]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}})+D_2[R]({\mathbf{q}},{\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big]\big)
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+2 (D-1) D_1[R]({\mathbf{q}},{\mathbf{q}})+(D-1) {\mathbf{p}}^2 X_2({{\boldsymbol \xi}})+(D-1) Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}})\Big]
{\nonumber \\}&
{}-({{\boldsymbol \xi}}^2-{\mathbf{p}}^2-{\mathbf{q}}^2)^2 \big[2 D_1[Z]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}})+D_2[R]({\mathbf{q}},{\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big]+4 {\mathbf{q}}^2 \big[{\mathbf{p}}^2 {\mathbf{q}}^2- ({{\boldsymbol \xi}}^2-{\mathbf{p}}^2-{\mathbf{q}}^2)^2/4\big]
D_2[Z]({\mathbf{q}},{\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}})\Big)
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+{G_\mathrm{T}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) \Big({G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}}) \big[({{\boldsymbol \xi}}^2-{\mathbf{p}}^2-{\mathbf{q}}^2)^2/4-{\mathbf{p}}^2 {\mathbf{q}}^2\big] \Big[2 \big(\big[ ({{\boldsymbol \xi}}^2-{\mathbf{p}}^2-{\mathbf{q}}^2)/2+{\mathbf{q}}^2\big] D_1[Z]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}})+D_1[R]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big)
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+Z({\mathbf{q}})+Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}})\Big]^2+(D-1) {\mathbf{p}}^2 \big[{\mathbf{p}}^2
X_2({\mathbf{q}})+Z({\mathbf{q}})\big]\Big) \Big\},\\
\partial_k X_2 (\p) ={}& \frac{-1}{4 (D-1) {\mathbf{p}}^4 \rho } \tilde\partial_k \int_{\mathbf{q}}\Big\{ -(D-1) \Big(D_1[Z]^2({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})
{\mathbf{q}}^4-D_2[Z]({\mathbf{q}},{\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}}) {\mathbf{q}}^2
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+D_2[Z]({\mathbf{q}},{\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}}) {\mathbf{q}}^2+(-{\mathbf{p}}^2-{\mathbf{q}}^2+{{\boldsymbol \xi}}^2) D_1[Z]^2({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}}) {\mathbf{q}}^2
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+2
Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) D_1[Z]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}}) {\mathbf{q}}^2+2 D_1[R]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) D_1[Z]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}}) {\mathbf{q}}^2
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+X_2({\mathbf{q}}) {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})+X_2({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) \big[{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})-{G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})\big]+Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}})^2 {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})+D_1[R]^2({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})
{G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+[(-{\mathbf{p}}^2-{\mathbf{q}}^2+{{\boldsymbol \xi}}^2)^2/4] D_1[Z]^2({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})+2 Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) D_1[R]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})
{G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+(-{\mathbf{p}}^2-{\mathbf{q}}^2+{{\boldsymbol \xi}}^2) Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) D_1[Z]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})
{G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})+D_2[R]({\mathbf{q}},{\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}})
\big[{G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})-{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})\big]
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+(-{\mathbf{p}}^2-{\mathbf{q}}^2+{{\boldsymbol \xi}}^2) D_1[R]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) D_1[Z]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})+\Big[\big(Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}})+D_1[R]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}})
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+\big[{\mathbf{q}}^2+ (-{\mathbf{p}}^2-{\mathbf{q}}^2+{{\boldsymbol \xi}}^2)/2\big] D_1[Z]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big)^2
\big[{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})-2 {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})\big]-X_2({\mathbf{q}})\Big] {G_\mathrm{T}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})\Big)
{\mathbf{p}}^4
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+\Big[- (D-1) D_1[Z]^2({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) \big({G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})
{G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})+\big[{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})-2 {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})\big] {G_\mathrm{T}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big) (-{\mathbf{p}}^2-{\mathbf{q}}^2+{{\boldsymbol \xi}}^2)^3/2
{\nonumber \\}&
{}-D_1[Z]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) \big(2 (2 D-3) D_1[Z]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {\mathbf{q}}^2+(D-1)
\big[Z({\mathbf{q}})+3 Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}})+4 D_1[R]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big]\big)
{\nonumber \\}&
{}\times\big({G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})
{G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})+\big[{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})-2 {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})\big] {G_\mathrm{T}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big) (-{\mathbf{p}}^2-{\mathbf{q}}^2+{{\boldsymbol \xi}}^2)^2/2
{\nonumber \\}&
{}-\Big(2 (D-3) D_1[Z]^2({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) \big({G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})
{G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})+\big[{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})-2 {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})\big] {G_\mathrm{T}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big) {\mathbf{q}}^4
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+D_1[Z]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) \Big[{G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}}) \big(\big[(D-3) Z({\mathbf{q}})+(3 D-5) Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}})+4 (D-2) D_1[R]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big] \big[{G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})-2 {G_\mathrm{T}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big] {\mathbf{q}}^2
{\nonumber \\}&
{} +2 (D-1)\big)+{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}}) \big(\big[(D-3)
Z({\mathbf{q}})+(3 D-5) Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}})+4 (D-2) D_1[R]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big] {G_\mathrm{T}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {\mathbf{q}}^2-2
D+2\big)\Big]
{\nonumber \\}&
{}-(D-1) \Big[2 D_2[Z]({\mathbf{q}},{\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) \big[{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})-{G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})\big] {\mathbf{q}}^2+2
D_2[R]({\mathbf{q}},{\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) \big[{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})-{G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})\big]
{\nonumber \\}&
{}-\big[Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}})+D_1[R]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big] \big[Z({\mathbf{q}})+Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}})+2 D_1[R]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big] \big({G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+\big[{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})-2 {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})\big] {G_\mathrm{T}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big)\Big]\Big) (-{\mathbf{p}}^2-{\mathbf{q}}^2+{{\boldsymbol \xi}}^2)
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+{\mathbf{q}}^2 \Big(4 D_1[Z]^2({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}})
\big({G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})+\big[{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})-2 {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})\big] {G_\mathrm{T}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big)
{\mathbf{q}}^4
{\nonumber \\}&
{}-4 D_2[Z]({\mathbf{q}},{\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}}) {\mathbf{q}}^2+4 D_2[Z]({\mathbf{q}},{\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})
{\mathbf{q}}^2+Z({\mathbf{q}})^2 {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}})^2 {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})+4
D_1[R]^2({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+2 Z({\mathbf{q}}) Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}}){G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})+4 Z({\mathbf{q}}) D_1[R]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})
{G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+4 Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) D_1[R]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})+4
D_2[R]({\mathbf{q}},{\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) \big[{G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})-{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})\big]
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+\big[Z({\mathbf{q}})+Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}})+2 D_1[R]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big]^2 \big[{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})-2 {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})\big] {G_\mathrm{T}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+4 D_1[Z]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) \Big[ \big[Z({\mathbf{q}})+Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}})+2 D_1[R]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big] \big[{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})-2 {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})\big] {G_\mathrm{T}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {\mathbf{q}}^2-2{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+\big(\big[Z({\mathbf{q}})+Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}})+2 D_1[R]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big] {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {\mathbf{q}}^2+2\big) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})\Big]\Big)\Big] {\mathbf{p}}^2
{\nonumber \\}&
{}-(D/4) (-{\mathbf{p}}^2-{\mathbf{q}}^2+{{\boldsymbol \xi}}^2)^2 \Big(-4
D_2[Z]({\mathbf{q}},{\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}}) {\mathbf{q}}^2+4 D_2[Z]({\mathbf{q}},{\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})
{\mathbf{q}}^2
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+Z({\mathbf{q}})^2 {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})+Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}})^2 {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})+4
D_1[R]^2({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+2 Z({\mathbf{q}}) Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}})
{G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})+4 Z({\mathbf{q}}) D_1[R]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})
{G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+4 Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) D_1[R]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})+4
D_2[R]({\mathbf{q}},{\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) \big[{G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})-{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})\big]
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+\big[Z({\mathbf{q}})+Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}})+2 D_1[R]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big]^2 \big[{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})-2 {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})\big] {G_\mathrm{T}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+ \big[2{\mathbf{q}}^2+ (-{\mathbf{p}}^2-{\mathbf{q}}^2+{{\boldsymbol \xi}}^2)\big]^2 D_1[Z]^2({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}})
\big({G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}}) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})+\big[{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})-2 {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})\big] {G_\mathrm{T}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big)
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+4 D_1[Z]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}}) \Big[-2 {G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})+\big(\big[{\mathbf{q}}^2+(-{\mathbf{p}}^2-{\mathbf{q}}^2+{{\boldsymbol \xi}}^2)/2\big]
{\nonumber \\}&
{}\times\big[Z({\mathbf{q}})+Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}})+2 D_1[R]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big] {G_\mathrm{L}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})+2\big) {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})
{\nonumber \\}&
{}+\big[{\mathbf{q}}^2+ (-{\mathbf{p}}^2-{\mathbf{q}}^2+{{\boldsymbol \xi}}^2)/2\big] \big[Z({\mathbf{q}})+Z({{\boldsymbol \xi}})+2 D_1[R]({\mathbf{q}},{{\boldsymbol \xi}})\big] \big[{G_\mathrm{L}}({\mathbf{q}})-2 {G_\mathrm{T}}({\mathbf{q}})\big] {G_\mathrm{T}}({{\boldsymbol \xi}})\Big]\Big)\Big\} ,\end{aligned}$$
where $D=d+1=3$.
Dimensionless variables {#app_adim}
-----------------------
The flow equations are solved using the dimensionless variables, $$\begin{gathered}
\tilde \p=k^{-1} \p, \quad \trho = v_D^{-1} Z_k k^{2-D} \rho , \\
\tilde h = Z_k^{-1} k^{-2} h , \quad \tilde A_\mu = k^{-1} A_\mu, \quad \tilde F_{\mu\nu} = k^{-2} F_{\mu\nu}
\end{gathered}$$ and functions $$\begin{gathered}
\tilde{W}_k(\trho) =Z_k^{-1}k^{-2}W_k(\rho),\\
\tilde{Z}_k(\tilde\p) =Z_k^{-1}Z_k(\p),\quad
\tilde{Y}_k(\tilde\p) =v_D Z_k^{-2} k^{D-2} Y_k(\p),\\
\tilde f_k(\tilde\p) = f_k(\p) , \quad \tilde \gamma_k (\tilde\p) = v_D^{-1} Z_k^2 k^{4-D} \gamma_k(\p) , \\
\tilde{X}_{1,k}(\tilde\p) =v_D^{-1}k^{4-D} X_{1,k}(\p), \quad
\tilde{X}_{2,k}(\tilde\p) =Z_k^{-1} k^{2} X_{2,k}(\p) ,
\end{gathered}$$ where $D=d+1=3$, $v_D=1/2^{D+1} \pi^{D/2}\Gamma(D/2)$ a numerical factor introduced for convenience and $Z_k\equiv Z_k(\p=0)$.
[63]{}ifxundefined \[1\][ ifx[\#1]{} ]{}ifnum \[1\][ \#1firstoftwo secondoftwo ]{}ifx \[1\][ \#1firstoftwo secondoftwo ]{}““\#1””@noop \[0\][secondoftwo]{}sanitize@url \[0\][‘\
12‘\$12 ‘&12‘\#12‘12‘\_12‘%12]{}@startlink\[1\]@endlink\[0\]@bib@innerbibempty [****, ()](\doibase doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00098-9) in [**](\doibase 10.1007/978-3-642-27320-9_2), , Vol. , (, ) pp. [**](\doibase 10.1007/978-3-642-05094-7) (, , ) [****, ()](\doibase
doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)90726-X) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1007/BF01553022) [****, ()](\doibase
10.1142/S0217751X94000972), [****, ()](\doibase
doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90446-4) [****, ()](\doibase
10.1088/1126-6708/1999/08/007) [****, ()](\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevB.64.054513) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.065004) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.062105) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1016/j.physletb.2005.10.086) [****, ()](\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevE.80.030103) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.026707) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.041118) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.063101) @noop [“,” ]{} (), [****, ()](\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevB.96.100501) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.174522) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1007/BF00655090) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.014513) @noop [**]{} (, ) @noop [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.054508) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.180501) [****, ()](\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevB.91.224501) [****, ()](\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevE.88.012113) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.125018) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.174433) @noop [****, ()]{} [****, ()](\doibase 10.1007/JHEP08(2016)036) [****, ()](\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevB.74.144506) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.144520) [****, ()](\doibase
10.1088/0305-4470/34/40/302) [****, ()](\doibase
doi:10.1088/0305-4470/31/40/006) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevE.51.1894) [****, ()](\doibase
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(03)00263-1) @noop [**]{}, ed. (, , ) [****, ()](\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevB.69.134413) [****, ()](\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevB.88.235108) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1140/epjb/e2017-80286-1) @noop [****, ()]{}, [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.14054) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.027203) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.031120) [****, ()](\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.587) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.8714) [****, ()](\doibase doi:10.1038/nphys2913) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.030402) [****, ()](\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevB.90.245109) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.240601) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1007/JHEP11(2015)106) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.056601) [****, ()](\doibase 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2806-6) [****, ()](\doibase http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.09.061) [****, ()](\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevD.89.034010) [****, ()](\doibase
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.04.027), [****, ()](\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.094009) [****, ()](\doibase
10.1103/PhysRevD.97.054015) @noop [“,” ]{} (), [****, ()](\doibase
10.1007/BF01556140)
[^1]: Momentum- and frequency-dependent correlation functions have also been studied in the context of QCD: see, e.g., Refs.
[^2]: At zero temperature, the bosonic Matsubara frequency $\wn=2n\pi T$ ($n$ integer) becomes a continuous variable.
[^3]: Lorentz invariance of the quantum model ensures that the velocity is not renormalized and equal to one in our units
[^4]: The regulator term $\Delta S_k$ ensures that the two-point vertex is a regular function of $\p$ for $|\p|\ll k$, i.e. $\Gamma^{(2)}_k(\p,\phibf=0)\sim k^{-\eta}\p^2$ at the critical point.
[^5]: Indeed the neglect of these diagrams appears as the main difference between LPA$''$ and BMW, the latter giving a much better estimate of the anomalous dimension. See, e.g., Ref. for a discussion of these diagrams.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: |
The structure of the interaction Hamiltonian in the first order $S-$matrix element of a Dirac particle in an Aharonov-Bohm (AB) field is analyzed and shown to have interesting algebraic properties. It is demonstrated that as a consequence of these properties, this interaction Hamiltonian splits both the incident and outgoing waves in the the first order $S-$matrix into their $\frac{\Sigma_3}{2}-$components ( eigenstates of the third component of the spin). The matrix element can then be viewed as the sum of two transitions taking place in these two channels of the spin. At the level of partial waves, each partial wave of the conserved total angular momentum is split into two partial waves of the orbital angular momentum in a manner consistent with the conservation of the total angular momentum quantum number.\
Keywords: Aharonov-Bohm scattering, Scattering matrix
address: |
Department of Physics, University of Jordan\
11942–Amman, Jordan
author:
- 'M.S.Shikakhwa\'
title: ' Dirac Particle in an Aharonov-Bohm Potential: The Structure of the First Order S-matrix'
---
Introduction
============
The observation [@feinberg; @corinaldesi] that the first order Born amplitude of a non-relativistic spinless particle in an Aharonov-Bohm (AB) potential [@ahar59] does not coincide with the exact amplitude when the latter is expanded to the same order triggered an unusual interest in the perturbative aspects of this problem. Various remedies for this essentially mathematical problem were suggested. Examples of some works that addressed this problem for non-relativistic spinless and spin one-half particles are [@hagen1; @boz1; @ouvry; @renormalization; @ruijinaars; @Rumiyyeh; @lozano; @hagen2; @fainberg]. For a Dirac particle, the success of the Born amplitude in providing results consistent with the exact amplitude expanded to the same order was demonstrated for the first order amplitude in [@vera],and for the second order in [@boz2]. A partial wave calculation of the first order amplitude was also recently reported [@shikakhwa] where consistency with the exact amplitude was also established.\
The present work focuses on the interaction Hamiltonian in the first order $S-$matrix element of a Dirac particle. The algebraic properties of this interaction Hamiltonian reported *partially* for the first time in a cursory manner in [@shikakhwa] are exploited in depth and new interesting properties are reported. In particular, we note the major focus in the above work is on carrying out partial wave analysis of the first order Born amplitude of a Dirac particle in an AB potential using the basis of the conserved angular momentum operator. In the present work, on the other hand, the emphasis is not on the calculations, no amplitudes or so are reported. It is an analysis of the structure of the first order S-matrix in view of the algebraic properties of the interaction Hamiltonian. These analyses which are carried out without using any explicit wave functions enjoy an intrinsic importance by themselves and provide a new insight (as will be shown) into the structure of the first order transition in the AB potential. Verification of this structure using explicit wave functions is also given.
Formalism
=========
A Dirac particle in an electromagnetic field is governed by the Hamiltonian ($\hbar=c=1$): $$\label{1}H=H_0+H_{\mathrm{int}}$$ where $$\label{2}H_0=\boldsymbol{\alpha}\cdot\mathbf{p}+\beta m$$ and $$\label{3}H_{\mathrm{int}}=eA_0-e\boldsymbol{\alpha}\cdot\mathbf{A}$$ Here, $e$ is the charge of the particle, ${\alpha}_i=\beta\gamma_i$ and $\beta=\gamma_4$. The $\gamma$’s are the Dirac matrices: $\{\gamma_\mu,\gamma_\nu\}=2g_{\mu\nu}$. While most of the treatment in this paper is independent of the explicit representation of these matrices, the Dirac-Pauli representation is used whenever called for: $$\label{4} \gamma ^i = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
0 & {\sigma ^i } \\
{ - \sigma ^i } & 0 \\
\end{array} } \right), \,\,\,\,\, \gamma ^4 = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
I & 0 \\
0 & { - I} \\
\end{array} } \right),$$ where $\sigma_i$’s ($i=1,..,3$) are the Pauli matrices, and $I$ is the $2\times 2$ identity matrix. The first order $S$-matrix element for the particle is : $$\label{5}S_{fi}^{(1)}=- i\int {d^4 x\,\bar \psi _f \left( x
\right)\left( {e\gamma _\mu A^\mu } \right)\psi _i \left( x
\right)}.$$ For the AB-potential [@ahar59], we have: $$\label{6}A_0=0,$$ and $$\label{7}\mathbf{A}=\frac{\Phi}{2\pi\rho}\hat{\epsilon}_\varphi,$$ where $\rho=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$, $\hat{\epsilon}_\varphi$ is the unit vector in the $\varphi$-direction, and $\Phi$ is the flux through the AB tube. The first order $S$-matrix in this case can then be written in the form: $$\label{8}S_{fi}^{(1)}=i\alpha \int {d\rho\, d\varphi\,
\psi^{\dagger} _f \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)\left( {O^ + + O^ -
} \right)\psi _i \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)}.$$ Here, $\alpha=-e\Phi/2\pi$ (in perturbative calculations $0<\alpha<1$). The $z$ degree of freedom in the above matrix element was suppressed, since the $z$-component of the momentum of the particle-as is well-known-is conserved in the transition. This simplifies the treatment and does not introduce any loss of generality. An overall energy conserving $\delta$-function resulting from the time integration was also suppressed.The $O^\pm$ operators introduced above are defined as: $$\label{9} O^\pm \equiv\big( \frac{\alpha_2\pm i\alpha_1}{2}\big)
e^{\pm i\varphi}$$ The above operators (note that $H_{\mathrm{int}}=\frac{O^{+}+O^{-}}{\rho}$)have interesting properties. One can easily check the following properties ($\Sigma_i=\frac{i}{2}[\gamma_i,\gamma_j] ;\; i,j=1..3$) : $$\begin{aligned}
[O^{+},O^{-}] &=& -2(\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2})\label{10} \\
\{O^{+},O^{-}\}\equiv O^{+}O^{-}+O^{-}O^{+}&=& I\label{11} \\
(O^{\pm})^{\dagger} &=& O^{^{\mp}}\label{12} \\
(O^{\pm})^{2} &=& 0\label{13}\end{aligned}$$ Moreover, the algebra of $ O^{\pm}$ with the third components of the spin, $\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}$, and the orbital angular momentum, $ L_{3}$, is also interesting; $$\begin{aligned}
[\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2},O^{\pm}] &=& \mp O^{\pm} \label{14}\\
\left[L_{3},O^{\pm}\right] &=& \pm O^{\pm} = -[\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2},O^{\pm}]\label{15}\\
\{\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2},O^{\pm}\}&=& 0.\label{16}\end{aligned}$$ Eqs.(\[14\]) and (\[15\]) suggest that the $O^{\pm}$ operators play the role of raising and lowering operators in the space of the eigenstates of $\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}$ and $L_{3}$. Now, products of the $O^{\pm}$ operators give rise to the following two Hermitian operators: $$\label{17}
P^{\pm}\equiv O^{\mp}O^{\pm}$$ which, in view of Eqs.(\[10\]) and (\[11\]) have the explicit forms $$\label{18}
P^{\pm}=\frac{1}{2}\pm \frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}$$ These two operators have a series of interesting properties that follow from the set of equations, Eqs.( \[10\]-\[13\]) $$\begin{aligned}
(P^{\pm})^{2} &=& P^{\pm} \label{19}\\
P^{+}P^{-}=P^{-}P^{+}&=&0 \label{20} \\
P^{+}+P^{-}= \{O^{+},O^{-}\}&=& I.\label{21}\end{aligned}$$ Eq.(\[18\]), on the other hand leads to the following remarkable property of $P^{\pm}$: $$\label{22}
\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}P^{\pm}=\pm\frac{1}{2}P^{\pm}$$ The above properties suggest that $P^{\pm}$ is a projection operator . Indeed, for an arbitrary Dirac spinor $\Psi$ , we have: $$\label{22b}
( P^{+}+P^{-})\Psi=P^{+}\Psi+P^{-}\Psi=\Psi$$ with $P^{+}\Psi\quad(P^{-}\Psi)$ being, in view of Eq.(\[22\]), an eigenstate of $\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}$ with eigenvalue $+\frac{1}{2}\quad(-\frac{1}{2})$ .Thus, $P^{\pm}$ project out $\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}$ eigenstates with $\pm\frac{1}{2}$ eigenvalues out of an arbitrary $\Psi$, thus allowing the splitting of this $\Psi$ into a linear combination of these eigenstates. The following properties of the products of $P^{\pm}$ and $O^{\pm}$ follow by invoking Eq.(\[13\]): $$\begin{aligned}
P^{+}O^{+} &=& P^{-}O^{-}= O^{+}P^{-} = O^{-}P^{+}=0 \label{24}\\
O^{+} &=& O^{+}P^{+} = P^{-}O^{+}P^{+}\label{25} \\
O^{-} &=& O^{-}P^{-} = P^{+}O^{-}P^{-}.\label{26}\end{aligned}$$ The following brackets can also be easily verified: $$\begin{aligned}
[O^{\pm},P^{+}]&=& \mp O^{\pm} \label{27}\\
\left[O^{\pm},P^{-}\right]&=& \pm O^{\pm}=- [O^{\pm},P^{+}]\label{28}\\
\left[ \frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2} ,P^{\pm} \right] &=& [L_{3},P^{\pm}]=0.\label{29}\end{aligned}$$ Before leaving this section, we record the following major result, which is a consequence of Eqs.(\[11\]), (\[22\]),(\[25\]) and (\[26\]) : $$\label{30}
\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}O^{\pm}=\mp\frac{1}{2}O^{\pm}.$$ This relation says that $O^{\pm}$ acting on any arbitrary $\Psi$ project it onto an eigenstate of $ \frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}$ with eigenvalues $\mp\frac{1}{2}$.
The First Order $S-$Martrix
===========================
In this section, we will consider the consequences of the formalism developed above on the first order scattering matrix element. We start by writing Eq.(\[8\]) in the form $$\label{31}
S^{(1)}_{fi}=i\alpha M$$ where $$\begin{aligned}
M&=&\int d\rho d\varphi \psi^{\dagger}_{f}(x)(O^{+}+O^{-})\psi
_{i}(x) \nonumber \\
&=& _{f}<\xi'|(O^{+}+O^{-})|\xi>_{i}\label{32}\end{aligned}$$ In the second line of the above equation we have switched to the Dirac notation which will be adapted now on . The labels $\xi$ and $\xi'$ denote the set of all quantum numbers of the initial and final states, respectively. This includes, for example, the quantum numbers of the free Hamiltonian $H_{0}$; a spin operator that commutes with $H_{0}$...etc. This set does not include the quantum numbers of $\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}$, as this does not commute with the free Hamiltonian and is not a constant of the transition. The amplitude $M$; Eq.(\[32\]), with the aid of Eqs.(\[25\]) and (\[26\]) can be written as $$\label{34}
M =
_{f}<\xi'|P^{-}O^{+}P^{+}|\xi>_{i}+_{f}<\xi'|P^{+}O^{-}P^{-}|\xi>_{i}$$ which, as a consequence of Eq.(\[22\]) reduces to $$\label{35}
M =
_{f}<\eta',\frac{-1}{2}|O^{+}|\eta,\frac{+1}{2}>_{i}+_{f}<\eta',\frac{+1}{2}|O^{-}|\eta,\frac{-1}{2}>_{i}$$ The states $|\eta,\frac{\pm 1}{2}>_{i}$ and $|\eta',\frac{\pm
1}{2}>_{f}$ ($\pm\frac{1}{2}$ in the above states are the quantum numbers of $\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}$) are,respectively, the $\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}-$components of the initial and final free particle states. These are projected out of these states through the action of the operators $P^{\pm}$ in accordance with Eq.(\[22\]) . $ \eta$ and $\eta'$ are the set of all the other quantum numbers of the states, which are generally different from $ \xi$ and $\xi'$ . The picture drawn by the above equation is that in the first order matrix element, the two operators $O^{\pm}$ constituting the effective interaction Hamiltonian split both the incident and outgoing waves into their $\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}-$components ( the two eigenstates of $\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}$) . The transition, is then the sum of two transitions induced by $O^{+}$ and $O^{-}$, with $O^{+}$ ($O^{-}$) linking only the $\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}-$component of the incident wave with eigenvalue $+\frac{1}{2}$ ($-\frac{1}{2}$) to the $\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}-$component of the outgoing wave with eigenvalue $-\frac{1}{2}$ ($+\frac{1}{2}$).\
Eq.(\[30\]) , on the other hand, tells us that the states $ O^{\pm}|\eta,\pm\frac{1}{2}>_{i}$ are eigenstates of $\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}$ with eigenvalues $\mp\frac{1}{2}$. This means that the $O^{\pm}$ operators flip the spin of the $\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}$ states. Thus, we can define new states $$\label{36}
\widehat{\left|\eta,\mp\frac{1}{2}\right>}_{i}\equiv
O^{\pm}\left|\eta,\pm\frac{1}{2}\right>_{i}$$ ( note the change $\pm\frac{1}{2}\rightarrow \mp\frac{1}{2}$ in the $\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}$ quantum number). We then write the transition matrix $M$ as $$\label{37}
M =
_{f}\left<\eta',\frac{-1}{2}\right|\widehat{\left.\eta,\frac{-1}{2}\right>}_{i}+_{f}\left<\eta',\frac{+1}{2}\right.\widehat{\left|\eta,\frac{+1}{2}\right>_{i}}.$$ The picture is even more interesting when one works with partial waves [@shikakhwa]. Here, one expands the incident and outgoing plane waves of the $S-$matrix in terms of the $J-$waves that are eigenstates of the set of commuting operators: The total angular momentum operator $J_{3}=L_{3}+\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}$, the Hamiltonian $H_0$ and the spin operator $S_3\equiv\beta\Sigma_3$; $$\label{45}
\begin{aligned}
H_0 \left|E,j=l+\frac{1}{2},s\right>& = E\left|E,j=l+\frac{1}{2},s\right> \\
J_3 \left|E,j=l+\frac{1}{2},s\right>& = j_3 \left|E,j=l+\frac{1}{2},s\right> = \left( {\ell + \tfrac{1}
{2}} \right)\left|E,j=l+\frac{1}{2},s\right> , \,\,\, \ell = 0, \pm 1,.... \\
S_3 \left|E,j=l+\frac{1}{2},s\right>& = s\left|E,j=l+\frac{1}{2},s\right> , \,\,\, s = \pm 1,
\end{aligned}$$ The $S-$matrix is then given as a sum over the partial amplitudes $M_{l}$ ( see section \[sec 4\] below) : $$\label{38}
M_{l}=\left
<E,j=l+\frac{1}{2},s\right|O^{+}+O^{-}\left|E,j=l+\frac{1}{2},s\right>$$ The conserved $J_{3}$ quantum number $j$ is set to $l+\frac{1}{2}$, $ l=0\pm 1,\pm 2,...$. The quantum numbers $s$ also survives the transition as well as the corresponding operator is also conserved. The above $J-$waves which are energy eigenstates as well, are not eigenstates of $\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}$ nor of $L_{3}$. Eqs.(\[25\]) and (\[26\]), along with Eq.(\[22\]) have the following consequences:
$$\begin{aligned}
O^{+}\left|E,j=l+\frac{1}{2},s\right> &=& P^{-}O^{+}\left|\lambda,j=l+\frac{1}{2},s;l,+\frac{1}{2}\right>\label{39}\\
O^{-}\left|E,j=l+\frac{1}{2},s\right>&=& P^{+}O^{-}\left|\lambda,j=l+\frac{1}{2},s;l+1,-\frac{1}{2}\right>\label{40}\end{aligned}$$
The states on the R.H.S are the components of the $J-$waves that are eigenstates of the operators $L_{3}$ and $\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}$ with eigenvalues $l$, $l+1$ and $\pm
\frac{1}{2}$, respectively. We denote these with the $L-$waves. $\lambda$ is a collective index for any other possible quantum number; energy is not one of these , however. The quantum numbers of $\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}$ and $L_{3}$ in the above $L-$waves have been fixed by the use of Eq.(\[22b\]), the fact that $j$ is conserved and fixed to $l+\frac{1}{2}$, and that $[J_{3},L_{3}]=[S_{3},L_{3}]=[J_{3},\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}]=[S_{3},\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}]=0$. Plugging Eqs.(\[39\]) and (\[40\]) into (\[38\]) , and allowing $P^{\pm}$ to act to the left, we get $$\begin{aligned}
\label{41}
M_{l}&=&\left
<\lambda',j=l+\frac{1}{2},s;
l+1,-\frac{1}{2}\right|O^{+}\left|\lambda,j=l+\frac{1}{2},s;l,+\frac{1}{2}\right>\nonumber\\
& &+\left <\lambda',j=l+\frac{1}{2},s;
l,+\frac{1}{2}\right|O^{-}\left|\lambda,j=l+\frac{1}{2},s;l+1,-\frac{1}{2}\right>.\end{aligned}$$ The incident and outgoing $J-$waves are split by the interaction into their $L-$wave components, with $O^+$ ($O^-$) linking incident $L-$waves with the set of eigenvalues $l,+\frac{1}{2}$ ($l+1,-\frac{1}{2}$) to outgoing $L-$waves with the set of eigenvalues $l+1,-\frac{1}{2}$ ($l,+\frac{1}{2}$). Note that the action of $O^{\pm}$ on the initial $L-$waves leads to raising or lowering of the quantum numbers of the operators $L_3$ and $\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}$ as dictated by Eqs.(\[14\]) and (\[15\]) . Note also that this takes place in a manner that conserves the total angular momentum quantum number $j=l+\frac{1}{2}$. So, we can again define new states : $$\begin{aligned}
\widehat{\left|\xi,j=l+\frac{1}{2},s;l+1,-\frac{1}{2}\right>} &\equiv& O^{+}\left|\xi,j=l+\frac{1}{2},s;l,+\frac{1}{2}\right> \label{43}\\
\widehat{\left|\xi,j=l+\frac{1}{2},s;l,+\frac{1}{2}\right>}&\equiv&
O^{-}\left|\xi,j=l+\frac{1}{2},s;l+1,-\frac{1}{2}\right>.\label{44}\end{aligned}$$
The Matrix element Using Explicit Wave Functions {#sec 4}
================================================
In this section, explicit partial wave functions are going to be used to verify the results of the previous section. The incident and outgoing wave functions in the matrix element, Eq.(\[8\]), are expanded in terms of the eigen functions of the conserved total angular momentum operator $J_{3}$. These functions ( $J-$waves) that are simultaneous eigen functions of the set of operators $H_{0}$, $J_{3}$ and $S_{3}=\beta\Sigma_{3}$ in accordance with Eq.(\[45\]) have the explicit form [@shikakhwa]: $$\label{46}
\psi _{\ell s} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right) =
\frac{{e^{i\ell \varphi } }} {{\sqrt {2\pi } \sqrt {2E} \sqrt {2s}
}}\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
{\sqrt {E + sm} \sqrt {s + 1} J_\ell \left( \xi \right)} \\
{i\epsilon _3 e^{i\varphi } \sqrt {E - sm} \sqrt {s - 1} J_{\ell + 1} \left( \xi \right)} \\
{\epsilon _3 \sqrt {E + sm} \sqrt {s - 1} J_\ell \left( \xi \right)} \\
{ie^{i\varphi } \sqrt {E - sm} \sqrt {s + 1} J_{\ell + 1} \left( \xi \right)} \\
\end{array} } \right)$$ Here $J_\ell\left(\xi\right)$ is the Bessel function of order $\ell$ ($\xi=p_\bot \rho$), and $\epsilon_3=\operatorname{sgn}(s)$. $p_\bot$ is the magnitude of the planar momentum. The above eigen functions are normalized as $$\label{47} \int {d\rho \,d\varphi \,\psi _{\ell 's'}^\dag \left(
{\mathbf{x}} \right)\psi _{\ell s} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right) =
\frac{1} {{p_ \bot }}\delta \left( {p_ \bot - p'_ \bot }
\right)\delta _{\ell \ell '} \delta _{ss'} } .$$ If one takes $\psi _i \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)$ and $\psi _f
\left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)$ to be eigenstates of $S_{3}$ as well, then one can verify the following expansion of these in terms of the $\psi_{\ell s}(\mathbf{x})$ functions [@shikakhwa]: $$\label{48}
\begin{aligned}
\psi _i \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)& = \sqrt {E_i } \sum\limits_\ell {(i)^\ell \psi _{\ell s} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)} \hfill \\
\psi _f \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)& = \sqrt {E_f } \sum\limits_\ell {(i)^\ell e^{ - i\ell \theta } \psi _{\ell s} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)} . \hfill \\
\end{aligned}$$ where $\theta$ is the scattering angle. So, the first order $S-$matrix element, Eq.(\[8\]), takes the form $$\label{49}S_{fi}^{(1)} = i\alpha E\sum\limits_\ell {(i)^\ell
\sum\limits_{\ell '} {( - i)^{\ell '} e^{i\ell '\theta } }
}M_{\ell}$$ where $M_{\ell}$ is now given by $$\label{50}
M_{\ell} = \int {d\rho \,d\varphi \, \psi _{\ell 's'}^{\dagger} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)\left( {O^ + + O^ - } \right)\psi _{\ell s} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)}$$ with $O^{\pm}$ as defined earlier. It is easy to check now that $$\begin{aligned}
\label{51}
\left( P^{+}+P^{-}\right)\psi _{\ell s} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)=\psi _{\ell s} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right) &=& P^{+}\psi _{\ell s} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right) +P^{-}\psi _{\ell s} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)\nonumber\\
&=&\phi_{\ell ,+\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)+ \phi_{\ell+1 ,-\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)\end{aligned}$$ where the functions $$\begin{aligned}
\phi _{\ell,+\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)& =& \frac{1}
{{\sqrt {2\pi } \sqrt {2E} \sqrt {2s} }} {\left(
{\begin{array}{*{20}c}
{\sqrt {E + sm} \sqrt {s + 1} J_\ell \left( \xi \right)e^{i\ell \varphi } } \\
0 \\
{\epsilon _3 \sqrt {E + sm} \sqrt {s - 1} J_\ell \left( \xi \right)e^{i\ell \varphi } } \\
0 \\
\end{array} } \right)}\label{52}\\
\phi _{\ell+1,-\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)&=& \frac{1}{{\sqrt {2\pi } \sqrt {2E} \sqrt {2s} }}{ \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
0 \\
{i\epsilon _3 \sqrt {E - sm} \sqrt {s - 1} J_{\ell + 1} \left( \xi \right)e^{i\left( {\ell + 1} \right)\varphi } } \\
0 \\
{i\sqrt {E - sm} \sqrt {s + 1} J_{\ell + 1} \left( \xi \right)e^{i\left( {\ell + 1} \right)\varphi } } \\
\end{array} } \right)}\label{53}\end{aligned}$$ are easily checked to be eigenstates of $\frac{\Sigma{3}}{2}$ and $L_{3}$ -as they should be- with eigenvalues $+\frac{1}{2}$ ($-\frac{1}{2}$) and $l$ ($l+1$) , respectively. Thus, with the use of Eqs.(\[24\]-\[26\]) we have now $M_{\ell}$ as: $$\label{54}
M_{\ell}=\int d\rho d\varphi\left(\phi
_{\ell+1,-\frac{1}{2}}^{\dagger}\left( {\mathbf{x}}
\right)O^{+}\phi _{\ell,+\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}}
\right)+\phi _{\ell,+\frac{1}{2}}^{\dagger} \left( {\mathbf{x}}
\right)O^{-}\phi _{\ell+1,-\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}}
\right)\right)$$ which is just Eq.(\[41\]). Note that the primes on the quantum numbers have been dropped as the matrix element is diagonal in these quantum numbers since the corresponding operators $J_{3}$ and $S_{3}=\beta\Sigma_{3}$ are conserved. Now, following Eqs.(\[43\]) and (\[44\]), we define $$\begin{aligned}
\widehat{ \phi} _{\ell+1,-\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)=O^{+}\phi _{\ell,+\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right) &=& \frac{1}
{{\sqrt {2\pi } \sqrt {2E} \sqrt {2s} }} {\left(
{\begin{array}{*{20}c}
0 \\
{i\epsilon _3 \sqrt {E + sm} \sqrt {s - 1} J_{\ell} \left( \xi \right)e^{i\left( {\ell + 1} \right)\varphi } } \\
0 \\
{i\sqrt {E + sm} \sqrt {s + 1} J_{\ell} \left( \xi \right)e^{i\left( {\ell + 1} \right)\varphi } }
\end{array} } \right)} \label{56}\nonumber\\
\widehat{\phi} _{\ell,+\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)=O^{-} \phi _{\ell+1,-\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)
&=& \frac{1}{{\sqrt {2\pi } \sqrt {2E} \sqrt {2s} }}{ \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
{\sqrt {E - sm} \sqrt {s + 1} J_{\ell+1} \left( \xi \right)e^{i\ell \varphi } } \\
0 \\
{\epsilon _3 \sqrt {E - sm} \sqrt {s - 1} J_{\ell+1} \left( \xi \right)e^{i\ell \varphi } } \\
0 \nonumber \\
\end{array} } \right)} \label{55}\\\end{aligned}$$ It is a trivial task to check that $\widehat{ \phi}
_{\ell+1,-\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)$ and $\widehat{\phi} _{\ell,+\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)$ are eigenstates of $\frac{\Sigma{3}}{2}$ and $L_{3}$ with the indicated eigenvalues. At this point, with the explicit wave functions at hand, it would be interesting to investigate the relation between the $L-$waves $\widehat{\phi} _{\ell,+\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}}
\right)$ ($\widehat{\phi} _{\ell+1,-\frac{1}{2}} \left(
{\mathbf{x}} \right)$) and the incident $L-$waves $\phi
_{\ell,+\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)$ ($\phi
_{\ell+1,-\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)$). Comparing Eqs.(\[52\]) and (\[56\]), for example, we see that $\widehat{\phi} _{\ell,+\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)$ is -apart from a constant- the same as $\phi _{\ell,+\frac{1}{2}}
\left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)$ except for the order of the Bessel function which is shifted by $+1$ in the former. It is, on the other hand, shifted by $-1$ in $\widehat{\phi}
_{\ell+1,-\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)$ in comparison to $\phi _{\ell+1,-\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)$. This shift in the order of the Bessel function gives rise to the phase shift of each partial amplitude. It was shown in [@shikakhwa] that the integral in the partial amplitudes $M_\ell$ reduces to an integral over Bessel functions of the form $\int d\rho J
_{\ell+1}J _{\ell}$, and this integral gives the partial phase shifts. Thus, The operators $O^{\pm}$, while flipping the spin and orbital angular momentum quantum numbers of each ingoing $L-$wave to match that of the outgoing one, keeps the order of the Bessel functions in the two waves shifted by $\pm1$ so as to generate the the phase shifts in the scattering process. To put this on more formal grounds, we define the two operators $d^{\pm}$: $$\label{60}
d^{\pm}\equiv\left(\partial_{\rho}\pm\frac{i}{\rho}\partial_{\varphi}\right)=\left(\partial_{\rho}\mp\frac{L_{3}}{\rho}\right)$$ that satisfy $$\label{61}
\left[d^{\pm},L_{3}\right]=\left[d^{\pm},\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}\right]=0.$$ We note that these operators - upon employing the well-known recurrence relations of Bessel functions- have the property $$\begin{aligned}
d^{+}J_\ell\left( \xi \right)e^{i\ell \varphi } &=& -p_\bot J_{\ell+1} \left( \xi \right)e^{i\ell \varphi } \\
d^{-}J_{\ell+1}\left( \xi \right)e^{i(\ell+1)\varphi } &=& p_\bot J_{\ell} \left( \xi \right)e^{i(\ell+1) \varphi
}\end{aligned}$$ Therefore, we can now write: $$\begin{aligned}
\widehat{ \phi} _{\ell+1,-\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)
=O^{+}\phi _{\ell,+\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}}
\right)&=&\frac{1}{p_\bot}\sqrt{\frac{E+sm}{E-sm}}d^{-} \phi _{\ell+1,-\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}}
\right)\label{58}\\
\widehat{ \phi} _{\ell,+\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)
=O^{-}\phi _{\ell+1,-\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}}
\right)&=&-\frac{1}{p_\bot}\sqrt{\frac{E-sm}{E+sm}}d^{+} \phi _{\ell,+\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}}
\right)\label{59}\end{aligned}$$ Substituting the above two equations into Eq.(\[54\]), we get : $$\label{57}
M_\ell=\frac{1}{p_\bot}\int d\rho
d\varphi\left[\sqrt{\frac{E+sm}{E-sm}}\left(\phi
_{\ell+1,-\frac{1}{2}}^{\dagger}\left( {\mathbf{x}} \right)d^{-}
\phi _{\ell+1,-\frac{1}{2}} \left( {\mathbf{x}}
\right)\right)-\sqrt{\frac{E-sm}{E+sm}}\left(\phi _{\ell,+\frac{1}{2}}^{\dagger} \left(
{\mathbf{x}} \right)d^{+} \phi _{\ell,+\frac{1}{2}} \left(
{\mathbf{x}}
\right)\right)\right]$$ The above equation says that we can write each partial amplitude as a sum of two transitions, with each one being a transition among two $L-$waves that have the same $L_3$ and $\frac{\Sigma_3}{2}$ quantum numbers. These $L-$waves are connected by the $d^\pm$ operators which merely affect the radial component of each partial wave, thus inducing the partial phase shifts. It is interesting indeed that in each of the two terms of the amplitude, the quantum numbers of the orbital angular momentum $L_3$ and the spin $\frac{\Sigma_3}{2}$ are conserved in the transition. It is as if we have replaced the $L_3$ and $\frac{\Sigma_3}{2}$ non-conserving interactions $O^\pm$ with the $d^\pm$ interactions that conserve these quantum numbers at the level of each partial $L-$wave.
Concluding Remarks
==================
A new insight into the structure of the first order $S$-matrix of a Dirac particle in an AB potential was provided through the derivation of interesting algebraic properties of the interaction Hamiltonian appearing in the matrix element. It was shown that the interaction Hamiltonian is the sum of the two operators $O^{\pm}$ and algebraic properties of these and related operators were reported. The fact that these operators have the properties (Eqs.(\[25\],\[26\])) $O^{\pm}=
P^{\mp}O^{\pm}P^{\pm}$ along with the fact that $\frac{\Sigma_3}{2}P^\pm=\pm\frac{1}{2}P^\pm$ (Eq.(\[22\])), were shown to suggest the following picture of the transition matrix element: The interaction splits both the incident and outgoing plane waves into their (unconserved) $\frac{\Sigma_3}{2}$ components so that the matrix element is the sum of two transitions from two initial eigenstates of the $\frac{\Sigma_3}{2}$ operator to final eigenstates of the same operators . Each of the operators $O^{\pm}$, by flipping the spin as a result of the property (Eq.(\[30\])) $\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}O^{\pm}=\mp\frac{1}{2}O^{\pm}$,links only the states with opposite spin quantum numbers.The transition, then, becomes the sum of two transitions induced by the two operators , each taking place in one of the spin channels. At the level of partial waves, the transition in each partial amplitude is the sum of two transitions taking place among the two unconserved $L-$wave components of each incident and outgoing $J-$wave.The fact that the total angular momentum of each partial wave is conserved leads to a flip not only of the $\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}$ quantum number , but also of the $L_3$ quantum number in the transition. Working with explicit partial wave functions, we have shown that it is possible to write each partial amplitude as the sum of two transitions, induced by a couple of two new operators, $d^\pm$, taking place among $L-$partial wave functions such that the $\frac{\Sigma_{3}}{2}$ and $L_3$ quantum numbers are conserved in each of these transitions.\
Finally, note that in deriving Eq.(\[35\]), no assumptions were made regarding the spin operator that one chooses to diagonalize with the free Hamiltonian. In the case of partial wave analysis (Eq.(\[41\])), however, the spin operator was taken to be $S_3=\beta\Sigma_3$. The result, however, depends only on the fact that this spin operator commutes with the operators $O^\pm$, i.e is a constant of the transition. Any other spin operator having this property will lead to the same result.
**Acknowledgments**\
The author is indebted to professor N.K.Pak and Dr. B.Tekin for a critical reading of an earlier version of the manuscript, and for very helpful discussions. He also thanks the physics department of Middle East Technical University at Ankara where this work was initiated for hospitality. Partial financial support by The Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TÜBÍTAK) is also acknowledged.
[2]{} Aharonov, Y. and Bohm,D. (1959), Physical Review **115**,485. Bergman, O. and Lozano, G. (1994), Ann.Phys.**229**,416. Boz, M. and Pak, N.K. (2000), Phys.Rev.D **62**,045022. Boz, M., Fainberg, V.Ya. and Pak, N.K. (1995), Phys. Lett. A **207**,1. Corinaldesi, E. and Rafeli, F. (1978), Am. J. Phys.**46**, 1185 . Fainberg, V.Ya., Pak, N.K. and Shikakhwa, M.S.(1995), J.Phys. A **31**,3531. Feinberg, E. L. (1963), Sov. Phys. Usp.**5**, 753 . Hagen, C.R. (1995), Phys. Rev.D**52**,2466. Hagen, C.R. (1997), Phys. Rev.D**56**,2250. Manuel, C. and Tarrach, R. (1994), Phys. Lett. B **328**,113. Ouvry, S. (1994), Phys. Rev.D**52**,5296. Romia, Y. and Shikakhwa, M. (2004), Tur.J.Phys.**28**,73. Ruijsenaars, R. (1983), Ann.Phys.**46**,1. Shikakhwa, M.S. and Pak, N.K. (2003), Phys. Rev.D**67**,105019. Vera, F. and Schmidt, I. (1990), Phys. Rev.D**42**,3591.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We study the effect of theoretical and parametric uncertainties on the ability of future Higgs coupling measurements at the International Linear Collider (ILC) to reveal deviations from the Standard Model (SM). To quantify the impact of these uncertainties we plot $\Delta \chi^2 = 25$ contours for the deviations between the SM Higgs couplings and the light Higgs couplings in the $m_h^{\rm max}$ benchmark scenario of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM). We consider the theoretical uncertainties in the SM Higgs decay partial widths and production cross section and the parametric uncertainties in the bottom and charm masses and the strong coupling $\alpha_s$. We find that the impact of the theoretical and parametric uncertainties is moderate in the first phase of ILC data-taking (500 fb$^{-1}$ at 350 GeV centre-of-mass energy), reducing the “reach” in the CP-odd MSSM Higgs mass $M_A$ by about 10% to $\sim 500$ GeV, while in the second phase (1000 fb$^{-1}$ at 1000 GeV) these uncertainties are larger than the experimental uncertainties and reduce the reach in $M_A$ by about a factor of two, from $\sim 1200$ down to $\sim 600$ GeV. The bulk of the effect comes from the parametric uncertainties in $m_b$ and $\alpha_s$, followed by the theoretical uncertainty in $\Gamma_b$.'
author:
- Andrew Droll
- 'Heather E. Logan'
title: |
Physics impact of ILC Higgs coupling measurements:\
the effect of theory uncertainties
---
Introduction
============
An important component of the physics case for the International Linear Collider (ILC) is its ability to perform high-precision measurements in the Higgs sector [@TeslaTDR; @OrangeBook; @Snowmass05Higgs]. In addition to measuring the Higgs mass, its spin and CP quantum numbers, and its self-coupling which characterizes the shape of the Higgs potential, the ILC will measure the Higgs couplings to a variety of Standard Model (SM) particles. In the SM, the masses of these particles arise solely through their couplings to the Higgs, so that these couplings are predicted in terms of the corresponding SM particle masses. The SM Higgs production cross sections and decay branching ratios are then fixed once the Higgs mass has been measured.
In extended models, however, the masses of the SM particles can receive contributions from more than one source, e.g., from couplings to each of two Higgs doublets. Further, the SM-like Higgs boson in extended models is typically an admixture of states from different scalar multiplets, leading to modifications of its couplings to SM particles by additional mixing angles. The high-precision ILC measurements of Higgs couplings thus provide a powerful tool for probing the structure of the Higgs sector and distinguishing the minimal SM from extended models.
Previous studies [@BattagliaMA; @CHLM; @OkadaMA; @PenarandaDb; @DawsonHeinemeyer] have quantified the “reach” of the ILC measurements within the context of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM). In this paper we study the impact on this reach due to the theoretical and parametric uncertainties that enter the SM predictions for the Higgs cross section and decay branching ratios. A first attempt at including the parametric uncertainties from the strong coupling and the bottom and charm quark masses was made in Ref. [@CHLM] by varying these parameters within their uncertainties and treating the resulting variation in the SM Higgs branching ratio predictions as an additional uncertainty to be added in quadrature with the uncertainty on the experimental measurement. An additional step was taken in Ref. [@LHatPC] where the theoretical uncertainties in the SM $\gamma\gamma \to H \to b \bar b$ rate were estimated based on the size of the computed radiative corrections. We refine and extend the analysis of the parametric uncertainties by taking into account their correlated effects on Higgs observables. We also include the full set of current theoretical uncertainties in the SM Higgs decay partial widths and production cross section, again taking into account their correlated effects on the ILC Higgs observables.
With the theoretical and parametric uncertainties in hand, we must choose a measure to quantify their impact. We choose to work in the $m_h^{\rm max}$ benchmark scenario of the MSSM as defined in Ref. [@CarenaBenchmarks]. We scan over points in the $M_A$–$\tan\beta$ plane and construct a chi-squared ($\chi^2$) observable between the SM and MSSM predictions. We plot contours of $\Delta \chi^2 = 25$, corresponding to a $5 \sigma$ discrepancy between the SM and the sample MSSM point. These contours allow us to show the impact of adding each of the theoretical and parametric uncertainties on top of the experimental uncertainties. Because the main purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of the theoretical uncertainties, we make no attempt to scan over more general sets of MSSM parameters or over non-supersymmetric models.
We begin in the next section with a brief overview of the MSSM Higgs couplings. framework of our analysis. In Sec. \[sec:chisquared\] we describe our $\chi^2$ procedure for dealing with the uncorrelated and correlated sources of uncertainty. In Sec. \[sec:inputs\] we collect the expected experimental uncertainties in the Higgs measurements and describe our treatment of the theoretical and parametric uncertainties, which typically feed in to multiple measurements in a correlated way. We provide a table of the dependence of individual Higgs decay partial widths on the input parameters $m_b$, $m_c$ and $\alpha_s$ so that our study can be updated in a straightforward way if the precision on these parameters improves. We present our numerical results in Sec. \[sec:results\]. Section \[sec:conclusions\] is reserved for discussion and conclusions. The current state of the art for the radiative corrections to SM Higgs decays, Higgs production in $e^+e^- \to \nu
\bar \nu H$, and the bottom and charm quark mass extraction from low-energy experimental data is reviewed in Appendices \[app:thy\], \[app:xsec\], and \[app:mbmc\], respectively.
Theoretical framework {#sec:theory}
=====================
The couplings of the lightest CP-even Higgs boson $h^0$ of the MSSM can be written at tree level in terms of the corresponding SM Higgs couplings as $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{g_{h^0 \bar t t}}{g_{H_{\rm SM} \bar t t}} =
\frac{g_{h^0 \bar c c}}{g_{H_{\rm SM} \bar c c}} &=&
\sin(\beta - \alpha) + \cot\beta \cos(\beta - \alpha)
\nonumber \\
\frac{g_{h^0 \bar b b}}{g_{H_{\rm SM} \bar b b}} =
\frac{g_{h^0 \tau \tau}}{g_{H_{\rm SM} \tau \tau}} &=&
\sin(\beta - \alpha) - \tan\beta \cos(\beta - \alpha)
\nonumber \\
\frac{g_{h^0 WW}}{g_{H_{\rm SM} WW}} =
\frac{g_{h^0 ZZ}}{g_{H_{\rm SM} ZZ}} &=& \sin(\beta - \alpha),
\label{eq:higgscoups}\end{aligned}$$ where $\alpha$ is the mixing angle that diagonalizes the mass matrix for the CP-even states $h^0$ and $H^0$, and $\tan\beta = v_2/v_1$ is the ratio of vacuum expectation values of the two MSSM Higgs doublets. At tree level we have $$\cos(\beta - \alpha) \simeq \frac{1}{2} \sin 4\beta \frac{m_Z^2}{M_A^2},
\label{eq:decoupling}$$ where $M_A$ is the mass of the CP-odd neutral MSSM Higgs boson. Note that in the *decoupling limit* $M_A \gg m_Z$ [@HowieDecoup], $\cos(\beta - \alpha)$ goes to zero and the $h^0$ couplings approach their SM values. Using Eqs. (\[eq:higgscoups\]) and (\[eq:decoupling\]) to expand the Higgs partial widths in powers of $m_Z^2/M_A^2$, we obtain [@CHLM] $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{\delta \Gamma_W}{\Gamma_W} = \frac{\delta \Gamma_Z}{\Gamma_Z}
&\simeq& - \frac{1}{4} \sin^2 4\beta \frac{m_Z^4}{M_A^4}
\simeq - 4 \cot^2 \beta \frac{m_Z^4}{M_A^4}
\nonumber \\
\frac{\delta \Gamma_b}{\Gamma_b}
\simeq \frac{\delta \Gamma_{\tau}}{\Gamma_{\tau}}
&\simeq& - \tan\beta \sin 4\beta \frac{m_Z^2}{M_A^2}
\simeq + 4 \frac{m_Z^2}{M_A^2}
\nonumber \\
\frac{\delta \Gamma_c}{\Gamma_c}
&\simeq& \cot \beta \sin 4\beta \frac{m_Z^2}{M_A^2}
\simeq - 4 \cot^2 \beta \frac{m_Z^2}{M_A^2},
\label{eq:deviations}\end{aligned}$$ where the last equality in each line uses the large $\tan\beta$ approximation $\sin 4 \beta \simeq - 4 \cot\beta$. In particular, for large $\tan\beta$, $\Gamma_b$ and $\Gamma_{\tau}$ exhibit the largest deviations from their SM values, while $\Gamma_W$ approaches its SM value very quickly with increasing $M_A$.
Beyond tree level, the Higgs couplings receive radiative corrections, which mainly impact the CP-even Higgs mass matrix [@CarenaHaberReview]. These can be taken into account by defining an effective mixing angle $\alpha_{\rm eff}$ for use in place of $\alpha$ in the above formulas. Significant radiative corrections can also appear in the $h^0 \bar b b$ vertex due to squark-gluino loops, with their dominant piece parameterized as $\Delta_b$ [@CarenaHaberReview]. Including this vertex correction, the $h^0 \bar b b$ coupling can be written as [@CHLM] $$\frac{g_{h^0 \bar b b}}{g_{H_{\rm SM} \bar b b}} =
\left[ \sin(\beta - \alpha) - \tan\beta \cos(\beta - \alpha) \right]
\frac{1 - \Delta_b \cot\alpha \cot \beta}{1 + \Delta_b}.$$ In the limit of large $M_A$, $\cot\alpha \cot\beta \to -1$ and the $\Delta_b$ corrections also decouple.
In this paper we make our $\chi^2$ comparisons using the implementations of the SM and MSSM Higgs couplings in the public Fortran code [HDECAY]{} [@HDECAY]. [HDECAY]{} computes the $h^0$ couplings using the $\alpha_{\rm eff}$ approximation, incorporating also the potentially significant $\Delta_b$ corrections to the $h^0 b \bar b$ coupling. For the loop-induced couplings of $h^0$ to photon or gluon pairs, [HDECAY]{} includes the shift in the contribution from SM particles in the loop[^1] due to the modified couplings in Eq. (\[eq:higgscoups\]), as well as the new contributions to the amplitude from supersymmetric particles running in the loop and from the charged Higgs boson for $h^0 \to
\gamma\gamma$. For comparisons involving MSSM Higgs production cross sections in $WW$ fusion and $ZH$ associated production, we scale the corresponding SM production cross section by $g^2_{h^0VV}/g^2_{H_{\rm SM}VV}$ ($V = W$ or $Z$) using the $\alpha_{\rm eff}$ approximation of [HDECAY]{}. We neglect the additional non-universal SUSY electroweak radiative corrections (e.g., box diagrams) beyond this approximation. While a full MSSM analysis should include complete non-universal SUSY corrections to Higgs partial widths and production cross sections, the approximations used in [HDECAY]{} are sufficient for our purposes in this paper.
Chi-squared analysis {#sec:chisquared}
====================
To quantify the impact of the experimental and theoretical uncertainties on the ability of ILC measurements to reveal deviations from the SM, we construct a $\chi^2$ according to $$\chi^2 = \sum_{i=1}^{n}\sum_{j=1}^n (Q_i^{M_1} - Q_i^{M_2})
[\sigma^2]^{-1}_{ij} (Q_j^{M_1} - Q_j^{M_2}),$$ where $Q_i$ are the observables being compared between models $M_1$ and $M_2$, and $[\sigma^2]^{-1}_{ij}$ is the inverse of the covariance matrix for the quantities $Q_i$, defined according to $$\sigma^2_{ij} = \delta_{ij} u_i u_j + \sum_{k=1}^m c_i^k c_j^k.$$ Here $u_i$ is the uncorrelated uncertainty in the observable $Q_i$, $c_i^k$ represents the $k$th source of correlated uncertainty in $Q_i$, and $\delta_{ij}$ is the Kronecker delta. In the absence of correlated uncertainties, $\sigma^2_{ij}$ is a diagonal matrix with the (positive definite) squares of the uncorrelated uncertainties $u_i$ down the diagonal. Correlated uncertainties introduce off-diagonal terms, which can be positive or negative depending on the sense of the correlation between observables $Q_i$ and $Q_j$.
In our analysis the observables $Q_i$ consist of Higgs branching fractions and Higgs production cross sections times branching fractions (i.e., rates in a particular channel). We take the expected experimental uncertainties on these quantities at the ILC from the literature. Because the existing experimental studies have not quantified the correlations between the measured observables, we treat the experimental uncertainties as uncorrelated. The theoretical and parametric uncertainties affect multiple observables, and we therefore treat them as correlated uncertainties.
Inputs {#sec:inputs}
======
Experimental inputs
-------------------
We consider Higgs measurements from two stages of ILC running:
- [**Phase 1:**]{} 500 fb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity at 350 GeV centre-of-mass energy, with no beam polarization. Expected uncertainties in the SM Higgs branching ratios for Higgs masses $m_H = 120$ and 140 GeV are taken from Ref. [@Desch] and summarized in Table \[tab:p1uncert\].
- [**Phase 2:**]{} 1000 fb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity at 1000 GeV centre-of-mass energy, with beam polarizations of $-80\%$ for electrons and $+50\%$ for positrons. Expected uncertainties in the SM Higgs production cross section times branching ratios for $m_H = 115$, 120 and 140 GeV are taken from Ref. [@Barklow] and summarized in Table \[tab:p2uncert\]. For the Phase 2 analysis, we include the existing Phase 1 measurements in the $\chi^2$ in addition to the new measurements at 1000 GeV.
[ccc]{}\
& $m_H = 120$ GeV & 140 GeV\
BR($b \bar b$) & $2.4\%$ & $2.6\%$\
BR($c \bar c$) & $8.3\%$ & $19.0\%$\
BR($\tau\tau$) & $5.0\%$ & $8.0\%$\
BR($WW$) & $5.1\%$ & $2.5\%$\
BR($gg$) & $5.5\%$ & $14.0\%$\
[cccc]{}\
& $m_H = 115$ GeV& 120 GeV & 140 GeV\
$\sigma \times {\rm BR}(b \bar b)$ & $0.3\%$ & $0.4\%$ & $0.5\% $\
$\sigma \times {\rm BR}(WW)$ & $ 2.1\%$ & $1.3\%$ & $ 0.5\% $\
$\sigma \times {\rm BR}(gg)$ & $ 1.4\%$ & $1.5\%$ & $ 2.5\% $\
$\sigma \times {\rm BR}(\gamma\gamma)$ & $ 5.3\%$ & $5.1\%$ & $ 5.9\% $\
The centre-of-mass energy of 350 GeV was chosen for the study in Ref. [@Desch] because it is near the peak of the $e^+e^- \to ZH$ cross section for the Higgs masses considered. It is also near the top quark pair production threshold, so that the Higgs data could be collected simultaneously with a top threshold scan. Running with polarized beams would improve the results by boosting the cross section and/or suppressing backgrounds. The actual ILC run plan will of course depend on what is discovered at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC), and may include multiple threshold scans or running at the maximal first-phase design energy of 500 GeV.
The study in Ref. [@Barklow] at 1000 GeV centre-of-mass energy found the expected statistical uncertainties on Higgs rates in various channels. The analysis selected events with $e^+e^- \to \nu \bar \nu H$, thus including Higgs production via $WW$ fusion and via $e^+e^- \to ZH$ with $Z \to \nu \bar \nu$. The Higgs decay products were then selected with the requirement that the visible energy in the event add up to the Higgs mass. The study in Ref. [@Barklow] evaluated the statistical uncertainties only. In our $\chi^2$ analysis we add an overall luminosity uncertainty of 0.1% [@TeslaTDR] for the Higgs rate measurements at 1000 GeV, completely correlated among the four channels. In this high-energy phase of ILC running, Higgs production is dominated by $WW$ fusion, the cross section for which grows with centre-of-mass energy for a fixed $m_H$. It is thus advantageous to run at the highest possible collider energy to maximize the statistics. Beam polarization was chosen to maximize the $WW$ fusion cross section.
In our analysis we scan over the $M_A$-$\tan\beta$ plane in the $m_h^{\rm max}$ scenario of the MSSM. At each parameter point we take the Higgs observables for $h^0$ and those for a SM Higgs boson of the same mass as the input for our $\chi^2$. For Higgs masses between 120 and 140 GeV, we obtain the expected experimental uncertainty on the Higgs observables using linear interpolation between the values given in Tables \[tab:p1uncert\] and \[tab:p2uncert\]. In the $m_h^{\rm max}$ scenario the $h^0$ mass never exceeds 130 GeV. For $h^0$ masses below 120 GeV, which occur in this scenario only at low $\tan\beta$ values $< 4$, we use the experimental uncertainties for $m_H = 120$ GeV from Table \[tab:p1uncert\] and apply linear interpolation only to the values given in Table \[tab:p2uncert\] between $m_H = 115$ and 120 GeV.
Theoretical and parametric uncertainties
----------------------------------------
### Higgs decay partial widths
The theoretical uncertainties in the SM Higgs decay partial widths due to uncalculated higher order radiative corrections are summarized in Table \[tab:thyuncert\]. We estimated these numbers based on the size of the known higher order corrections for Higgs masses in our range of interest; for details see Appendix \[app:thy\]. In all cases we use the best theory uncertainty available in the literature for our $\chi^2$ calculation; in some cases the theory uncertainty in the [HDECAY]{} calculation is larger because not all available radiative corrections have been implemented into the [HDECAY]{} code [@Spirareview].
------------------------------------------ --------------- ---------------
Higgs partial width in literature in [HDECAY]{}
$\Gamma_{b \bar b}$, $\Gamma_{c \bar c}$ 1% 1%
$\Gamma_{\tau\tau}$, $\Gamma_{\mu\mu}$ 0.01% 0.01%
$\Gamma_{WW}$, $\Gamma_{ZZ}$ 0.5% 5%
$\Gamma_{gg}$ 3% 16%
$\Gamma_{\gamma\gamma}$ 0.1% 4%
$\Gamma_{Z\gamma}$ 4% 4%
Higgs production cross section
$\sigma_{e^+e^- \to \nu \bar \nu H}$ 0.5% –
------------------------------------------ --------------- ---------------
: Estimated fractional theoretical uncertainties in the SM Higgs partial widths and production cross section due to uncalculated higher order corrections. See Appendices \[app:thy\] and \[app:xsec\] for details.[]{data-label="tab:thyuncert"}
Working entirely in terms of fractional uncertainties, the correlated uncertainty $c_i^k$ in branching ratio $i$ due to the theoretical uncertainty in the SM prediction for partial width $k$ is given by the formula $$c_i^k = \frac{\Gamma_k}{{\rm BR}_i}
\frac{\partial {\rm BR}_i}{\partial \Gamma_k} \, \sigma_{\Gamma_k},$$ where $\sigma_{\Gamma_k}$ is the (fractional) theoretical uncertainty on partial width $\Gamma_k$. The normalized derivatives are given analytically by $$\frac{\Gamma_k}{{\rm BR}_i}
\frac{\partial {\rm BR}_{i}}{\partial \Gamma_k} = \left\{
\begin{array}{ll}
-{\rm BR}_k & \ {\rm for} \ i \neq k \\
(1 - {\rm BR}_k) & \ {\rm for} \ i = k.
\end{array} \right.
\label{eq:dBRdGamma}$$
### Cross section for $e^+e^- \to \nu \bar\nu H$
At 1000 GeV centre-of-mass energy the production cross section for $e^+e^- \to \nu \bar \nu H$ is dominated by $WW$ fusion, with a subleading contribution from $e^+e^- \to ZH$ with $Z \to \nu \bar
\nu$. The SM cross section is currently known including the one-loop electroweak radiative corrections [@Belanger; @Dittmaier1; @Dittmaier2]. We take the remaining theoretical uncertainty in the cross section to be $0.5\%$; see Appendix \[app:xsec\] for details. This cross section uncertainty is included in the $\chi^2$ calculation in the same way as the luminosity uncertainty discussed earlier, completely correlated among the four rate measurements.
### $\alpha_s$, $\overline{m}_b(M_b)$, and $\overline{m}_c(M_c)$
The most important sources of parametric uncertainties in the SM Higgs coupling calculations are the strong coupling $\alpha_s$ and the bottom and charm quark masses. The input values used in our analysis are summarized in Table \[tab:paraminputs\]. For $\alpha_s$ we use the current world average from the Particle Data Group [@PDG]. For the bottom and charm quark masses we use the values from fits to the kinematic moments in inclusive semileptonic $B$ meson decays; details are given in Appendix \[app:mbmc\]. We make the approximation that the $\overline {\rm MS}$ quark mass $\overline{m_q}(M_q)$ evaluated at the corresponding quark pole mass $M_q$ (used by [HDECAY]{}) is the same as the mass $\overline{m_q}(\overline{m_q})$ evaluated at its own running mass (extracted from the $B$ decay fits).
Parameter Value Percent uncertainty Source
----------------------- ----------------------- --------------------- ---------------
$\alpha_s(m_Z)$ $0.1185 \pm 0.0020$ 1.7% [@PDG]
$\overline{m_b}(M_b)$ $4.20 \pm 0.04$ GeV 0.95% [@Buchmuller]
$\overline{m_c}(M_c)$ $1.224 \pm 0.057$ GeV 4.7% [@HoangBsl]
: Central values and uncertainties of $\alpha_s$ and the $\overline{\rm MS}$ bottom and charm quark masses $\overline{m_b}(M_b)$ and $\overline{m_c}(M_c)$ used in the analysis.[]{data-label="tab:paraminputs"}
We implement the parametric uncertainties in the $\chi^2$ calculation as follows. Again, all uncertainties are fractional. The correlated uncertainty $c_i^{x_j}$ in branching ratio $i$ due to the parametric uncertainty in $x_j \in \{ \alpha_s(m_Z), \overline{m_b}(M_b), \overline{m_c}(M_c) \}$ is given by $$c_i^{x_j}
= \frac{x_j}{{\rm BR}_i}
\frac{\partial {\rm BR}_i}{\partial x_j} \, \sigma_{x_j}
= \sum_{k=1}^n
\left[
\frac{\Gamma_k}{{\rm BR}_i} \frac{ \partial {\rm BR}_i}{\partial \Gamma_k}
\right]
\left[
\frac{x_j}{\Gamma_k} \frac{\partial \Gamma_k}{\partial x_j} \right] \,
\sigma_{x_j},$$ where $\sigma_{x_j}$ is the (fractional) uncertainty on the parameter $x_j$. The second equality was obtained using the chain rule; the first term inside the sum was given explicitly in Eq. (\[eq:dBRdGamma\]).
The calculation thus consists of evaluating the derivatives $\partial \Gamma_k / \partial x_j$ while holding constant all the parameters other than $x_j$. In principle, this can be done by varying each of the inputs $x_j$ in [HDECAY]{} and reading off the resulting variation in $\Gamma_k$. This is complicated by the fact that [HDECAY]{} takes as inputs not the running masses $\overline{m_b}(M_b)$ and $\overline{m_c}(M_c)$, but the pole masses $M_b$ and $M_c$ themselves. Varying $M_b$ while holding $M_c$ constant is not the same as varying $\overline{m_b}(M_b)$ while holding $\overline{m_c}(M_c)$ constant; likewise, varying $\alpha_s(m_Z)$ while holding $M_b$ and $M_c$ constant results in a variation of $\overline{m_b}(M_b)$ and $\overline{m_c}(M_c)$.
To deal with this, we use the chain rule and next-to-leading-order (NLO) approximations. We start by writing the quark pole masses as functions of our desired input parameters: $M_b = M_b(\overline{m_b}, \alpha_s)$ and $M_c = M_c(\overline{m_b}, \overline{m_c}, \alpha_s)$, where the running quark masses are understood to be evaluated at their corresponding pole mass scales and $\alpha_s \equiv \alpha_s(m_Z)$. Any Higgs partial width $\Gamma$ can then be expressed as $\Gamma = \Gamma(M_b(\overline{m_b}, \alpha_s),
M_c(\overline{m_b}, \overline{m_c}, \alpha_s), \alpha_s)$. The chain rule then gives $$\begin{aligned}
\left. \frac{\partial \Gamma}{\partial \overline{m_b}}
\right|_{\overline{m_c},\alpha_s}
&=& \left. \frac{\partial \Gamma}{\partial M_b} \right|_{M_c,\alpha_s}
\left. \frac{\partial M_b}{\partial \overline{m_b}}
\right|_{\alpha_s}
+ \left. \frac{\partial \Gamma}{\partial M_c} \right|_{M_b,\alpha_s}
\left. \frac{\partial M_c}{\partial \overline{m_b}}
\right|_{\overline{m_c},\alpha_s} \\ \nonumber
\left. \frac{\partial \Gamma}{\partial \overline{m_c}}
\right|_{\overline{m_b},\alpha_s}
&=& \left. \frac{\partial \Gamma}{\partial M_c} \right|_{M_b,\alpha_s}
\left. \frac{\partial M_c}{\partial \overline{m_c}}
\right|_{\overline{m_b},\alpha_s} \\ \nonumber
\left. \frac{\partial \Gamma}{\partial \alpha_s}
\right|_{\overline{m_b},\overline{m_c}}
&=& \left. \frac{\partial \Gamma}{\partial \alpha_s} \right|_{M_b,M_c}
+ \left. \frac{\partial \Gamma}{\partial M_b} \right|_{M_c,\alpha_s}
\left. \frac{\partial M_b}{\partial \alpha_s} \right|_{\overline{m_b}}
+ \left. \frac{\partial \Gamma}{\partial M_c} \right|_{M_b,\alpha_s}
\left. \frac{\partial M_c}{\partial \alpha_s}
\right|_{\overline{m_b},\overline{m_c}}.\end{aligned}$$
[HDECAY]{} can be used in a straightforward way to numerically evaluate $[\partial \Gamma/\partial M_b]_{M_c,\alpha_s}$, $[\partial
\Gamma/\partial M_c]_{M_b,\alpha_s}$, and $[\partial \Gamma/\partial
\alpha_s]_{M_b,M_c}$. We did this by varying each of the input parameters $M_b$, $M_c$, and $\alpha_s$ about its central value over a range of approximately twice its uncertainty as given in Table \[tab:paraminputs\]. We also checked explicitly that the dependence of each of the partial widths was linear under these (small) variations.
We evaluate the remaining derivatives analytically as follows. The relation between the pole mass $M_q$ and running mass $\overline{m_q} \equiv \overline{m_q}(M_q)$ at NLO is $$M_q = \overline{m_q} \left[ 1 + \frac{4}{3\pi} \alpha_s(M_q) \right].
\label{eq:Mqas}$$ Differentiating this with respect to $\overline{m_q}$ yields $$\frac{\partial M_q}{\partial \overline{m_q}}
= 1 + \frac{4}{3\pi} \alpha_s(M_q)
+ \overline{m_q} \frac{4}{3\pi}
\frac{\partial \alpha_s(M_q)}{\partial \overline{m_q}}.$$ The derivative of $\alpha_s$ can be found from the NLO formula $$\alpha_s(M_q)
= \frac{\alpha_s(\mu)}{1 + (b/2\pi) \alpha_s(\mu) \log(M_q/\mu)},
\label{eq:runningals}$$ where $b = 11 - 2 N_f / 3$ and $N_f$ is the number of active quark flavours in the running of $\alpha_s$ between the scales $\mu$ and $M_q$. In particular, $\partial \alpha_s(M_q) / \partial \overline{m_q} = \mathcal{O}(\alpha_s^2)$; working to NLO we will neglect this term. The derivative of interest then becomes $$\frac{\partial M_q}{\partial \overline{m_q}}
\simeq 1 + \frac{4}{3} \alpha_s(M_q) = \frac{M_q}{\overline{m_q}},$$ i.e., the normalized derivative $(\overline{m_q}/M_q)(\partial M_q/\partial \overline{m_q}) = 1$ at NLO. A similar calculation yields $\partial M_c/\partial \overline{m_b} = 0$ at NLO.
The derivatives of the quark pole masses with respect to $\alpha_s$ are evaluated as follows. From Eq. (\[eq:Mqas\]) we have, to NLO, $$\frac{\partial M_q}{\partial \alpha_s(m_Z)}
= \overline{m_q} \frac{4}{3\pi}
\frac{\partial \alpha_s(M_q)}{\partial \alpha_s(m_Z)}.
\label{eq:dMqdals}$$ Equation (\[eq:runningals\]) can be used to evaluate the $\alpha_s$ derivative at NLO,[^2] $$\frac{\partial \alpha_s(M_q)}{\partial \alpha_s(m_Z)}
= \left[ \frac{\alpha_s(M_q)}{\alpha_s(m_Z)} \right]^2.
\label{eq:dalsdals}$$ Combining Eqs. (\[eq:dMqdals\]) and (\[eq:dalsdals\]) we find for the normalized derivative, $$\frac{\alpha_s(m_Z)}{M_q} \frac{\partial M_q}{\partial \alpha_s(m_Z)}
= \frac{\overline{m_q}}{M_q} \frac{4}{3\pi} \alpha_s(M_q)
\frac{\alpha_s(M_q)}{\alpha_s(m_Z)}
\simeq \frac{4}{3\pi} \alpha_s(M_q),$$ where in the last step we keep only terms up to NLO.
The dependences of the SM Higgs partial widths $\Gamma_i$ on variations in the inputs $x_j \in \{ \alpha_s, \overline{m_b}(M_b), \overline{m_c}(M_c) \}$ are summarized in Table \[tab:normderivs\] in the form of normalized derivatives, $(x_j/\Gamma_i) (\partial \Gamma_i / \partial x_j)$, evaluated at the central values of the inputs $x_j$. For example, for $m_H = 120$ GeV, a 1% increase in $\overline{m_b}(M_b)$ leads to a 2.6% increase in $\Gamma_{b \bar b}$, while a 1% increase in $\alpha_s(m_Z)$ leads to a 1.2% decrease in $\Gamma_{b \bar b}$. The dependence of the normalized derivatives on the Higgs mass is not very strong. We again use linear interpolation to find the appropriate normalized derivatives for Higgs mass values between those given in Table \[tab:normderivs\]. Finally, we note that the Higgs partial widths to $WW$, $ZZ$, and lepton pairs, and the production cross section for $e^+e^- \to \nu \bar \nu H$, do not depend on $\alpha_s$, $\overline{m_b}(M_b)$, or $\overline{m_c}(M_c)$.
[c|ccc|ccc|ccc]{}\
& & &\
$m_H$ &120 GeV&140 GeV&160 GeV& 120 GeV&140 GeV&160 GeV& 120 GeV&140 GeV&160 GeV\
$\Gamma_{b\bar{b}}$ & $-1.177$ & $-1.217$ & $-1.249$ & 2.565 & 2.567 & 2.568 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000\
$\Gamma_{c\bar{c}}$ & $-4.361$ & $-4.400$ & $-4.432$ & $-0.083$ & $-0.084$ & $-0.084$ & 3.191 & 3.192 & 3.192\
$\Gamma_{gg}$ & 2.277 & 2.221 & 2.175 & $-0.114$ & $-0.112$ & $-0.104$ & $-0.039$ & $-0.032$ & $-0.027$\
$\Gamma_{\gamma\gamma}$ & 0.002 & 0.002 & 0.001 & 0.010 & 0.008 & 0.005 & 0.012 & 0.009 & 0.005\
The general pattern of the normalized derivatives in Table \[tab:normderivs\] can be understood as follows. The $H \to q \bar q$ partial widths are proportional to $\overline{m}_q^2(m_H)$ \[see Eq. (\[eq:GH2qq\])\]. Neglecting QCD running of the quark mass, the normalized derivative of $\Gamma_{q \bar q}$ with respect to $\overline{m_q}$ should thus be equal to 2. The values in Table \[tab:normderivs\] are actually somewhat larger than 2 because of the effect of QCD running, which causes $\overline{m_q}(\mu)$ to decrease as the scale $\mu$ increases. Raising $\overline{m_q}(M_q)$ by a small amount reduces the range of scales (from $M_q$ to $m_H$) over which the QCD running is applied, so that $\overline{m_q}(m_H)$ is even larger than it would be just from the increase in $\overline{m_q}(M_q)$ without the effect of the running. This effect is more pronounced in $\Gamma_{c \bar c}$ than in $\Gamma_{b \bar b}$ because $\alpha_s$ is larger at the charm quark mass scale than at the bottom mass scale, resulting in faster running for $\overline{m_c}$ near the scale $M_c$. Similarly, increasing $\alpha_s(m_Z)$ strengthens the QCD running of $\overline{m_q}$, resulting in a reduction of $\Gamma_{q \bar q}$. Changing $\alpha_s$ also affects the QCD corrections to $\Gamma_{q \bar q}$; however, the dominant effect is absorbed already into the running quark mass.
The slight dependence of $\Gamma_{c \bar c}$ on $\overline{m_b}(M_b)$ is due to the effect of the $b$ threshold on the running of $\overline{m_c}$. Adding the $b$ quark to the renormalization group equations slows down the running of $\overline{m_c}$, so that increasing the $b$ mass slightly reduces the high-scale value of $\overline{m_c}$ and thus reduces $\Gamma_{c \bar c}$. Note that by working to NLO in evaluating the derivatives above, we have neglected contributions to the $\overline{m_b}$ dependence of $\Gamma_{c \bar
c}$ of the same order as those that give the dependence shown in Table \[tab:normderivs\]; a higher order treatment would thus give different results. However, the numerical effect of these terms is negligible, so we do not attempt a more precise evaluation here.
$\Gamma_{gg}$ is proportional to $\alpha_s^2$ at leading order. NLO QCD corrections increase $\Gamma_{gg}$ rather significantly, leading to a normalized derivative somewhat larger than 2. $\Gamma_{gg}$ is dominated in the SM by the top quark loop, so that the effect of varying $\overline{m_b}(M_b)$ and $\overline{m_c}(M_c)$ is small. The anticorrelation in this case is due to destructive interference between the real parts of the $b$ and $c$ quark loop amplitudes and the top quark loop amplitude.
Finally, the similar sensitivity of $\Gamma_{\gamma\gamma}$ to $\overline{m_b}(M_b)$ and $\overline{m_c}(M_c)$ can be understood by noting that the bottom and charm quark loops contribute mainly through their interference with the dominant top and $W$ boson loops, and that their contributions go like $\overline{m_b}(m_H) Q_b^2$ and $\overline{m_c}(m_H) Q_c^2$, respectively, while $\overline{m_b}(\mu)/\overline{m_c}(\mu)
\simeq 0.235 \pm 0.012$ [@Buchmuller] and $Q_c^2 = 4 Q_b^2$ so that the two contributions are actually comparable.
Results {#sec:results}
=======
Our main results are summarized in Fig. \[fig:maincurves\],
where we plot $\Delta \chi^2 = 25$ contours for the deviations between the SM Higgs and the lighter CP-even Higgs in the $m_h^{\rm max}$ scenario of the MSSM. To the left of these contours, the MSSM Higgs can be distinguished from the SM Higgs at more than the 5$\sigma$ level. The dashed curves show the reach including experimental uncertainties only, while the solid curves show the effect of adding the theoretical and parametric uncertainties.
For the first phase of ILC running (the left pair of curves in Fig. \[fig:maincurves\]; 500 fb$^{-1}$ at 350 GeV, experimental uncertainties from Table \[tab:p1uncert\]), the impact of the theoretical and parametric uncertainties is to reduce the reach in $M_A$ by about 50 GeV, or roughly 10%. Details are shown in Figs. \[fig:phase1curvesPar\] and \[fig:phase1curvesThy\],
where we plot separately the contribution of each source of parametric and theoretical uncertainty. The bulk of the effect is due to the parametric uncertainties in $\overline{m_b}(M_b)$ and $\alpha_s(m_Z)$, as shown in Fig. \[fig:phase1curvesPar\]. Smaller contributions come from the theoretical uncertainty in $\Gamma_b$, and for low $\tan \beta \lesssim 6$ from the parametric uncertainty in $\overline{m_c}(M_c)$ and the theoretical uncertainty in $\Gamma_g$. The change with $\tan\beta$ is partly due to the decrease in $m_h$ with decreasing $\tan\beta$, as shown by the horizontal dotted lines in Figs. \[fig:phase1curvesPar\] and \[fig:phase1curvesThy\].
The relative importance of the different branching fraction measurements in the first phase of ILC running is illustrated in Table \[tab:phase1pulls\].
[ccccccc]{}\
Observable & Shift & Expt uncert & Pull & Thy+param uncert & Total uncert & Pull\
BR($b\bar{b}$) & 8.1% & 2.5% & 3.25 & 1.6% & 3.0% & 2.71\
BR($c\bar{c}$) & $-12.0\%$ & 13.2% & $-0.90$ & 16.1% & 20.8% & $-0.57$\
BR($\tau\tau$) & 10.0% & 6.4% & 1.56 & 1.8% & 6.6% & 1.51\
BR($WW$) & $-11.6\%$ & 3.9% & $-2.96$ & 1.8% & 4.3% & $-2.68$\
BR($gg$) & $-14.7\%$ & 9.4% & $-1.56$ & 5.8% & 11.1% & $-1.33$\
We list the fractional deviations of the MSSM Higgs branching ratios from their SM values at the “Phase 1 sample point” $M_A = 537.6$ GeV and $\tan\beta = 20$, which lies on the $\Delta \chi^2 = 25$ contour from experimental uncertainties only and yields $m_h = 129.2$ GeV. The relevant branching fractions deviate by roughly 10% from their SM values at this sample point. The biggest contributions to the $\Delta \chi^2$ come from the best-measured branching fractions, BR($b \bar b$) and BR($WW$). Including the theoretical and parametric uncertainties moderately degrades the precision in all the channels, reducing the $\Delta \chi^2$ from 25 down to 17.4 at the sample point. This $\Delta \chi^2$ is slightly worse than the value of 18.9 that would be obtained by summing the squares of the pulls in Table \[tab:phase1pulls\]; this is due to the effect of the off-diagonal elements in the correlation matrix. The effects of the most important parametric uncertainties, in $\overline{m_b}(M_b)$ and $\alpha_s(m_Z)$, are anticorrelated between BR($b \bar b$) and BR($WW$) and thus can mimic the anticorrelated shift in these observables that occurs in the MSSM.
For the second phase of ILC running (the right set of curves in Fig. \[fig:maincurves\]; combining measurements from 1000 fb$^{-1}$ at 1000 GeV and 500 fb$^{-1}$ at 350 GeV, experimental uncertainties from Tables \[tab:p1uncert\] and \[tab:p2uncert\]), the experimental uncertainties are considerably smaller. The theoretical and parametric uncertainties thus have a much more significant impact: their effect is to reduce the reach in $M_A$ by about a factor of two, from about 1200–1400 GeV down to about 525–700 GeV. Details are shown in Figs. \[fig:phase2curvesPar\] and \[fig:phase2curvesThy\].
The dominant contributions by far are the parametric uncertainties in $\overline{m_b}(M_b)$ and $\alpha_s(m_Z)$ (Fig. \[fig:phase2curvesPar\]), followed by the theoretical uncertainty in $\Gamma_b$ and for low $\tan\beta \lesssim 4$ in $\Gamma_g$ (Fig. \[fig:phase2curvesThy\]).
The impact of the parametric and theoretical uncertainties on the individual channels used in the Phase 2 $\Delta \chi^2$ calculation is illustrated in Table \[tab:phase2pulls\].
[ccccccc]{}\
Observable & Shift & Expt uncert & Pull & Thy+param uncert & Total uncert & Pull\
BR($b\bar{b}$) & 1.7% & 2.5% & 0.67 & 1.7% & 3.0% & 0.55\
BR($c\bar{c}$) & $-2.5\%$ & 13.3% & $-0.19$ & 16.1% & 20.8% & $-0.12$\
BR($\tau\tau$) & 2.1% & 6.4% & 0.34 & 1.8% & 6.6% & 0.32\
BR($WW$) & $-2.1\%$ & 3.9% & $-0.53$ & 1.8% & 4.3% & $-0.48$\
BR($gg$) & $-4.6\%$ & 9.4% & $-0.48$ & 5.8% & 11.1% & $-0.41$\
$\sigma \times {\rm BR}(b \bar{b})$ & 1.7% & 0.45% & 3.72 & 1.7% & 1.8% & 0.93\
$\sigma \times {\rm BR}(WW)$ & $-2.1\%$ & 0.93% & $-2.22$ & 1.9% & 2.1% & $-0.98$\
$\sigma \times {\rm BR}(gg)$ & $-4.6\%$ & 2.0% & $-2.32$ & 5.8% & 6.2% & $-0.74$\
$\sigma \times {\rm BR}(\gamma \gamma)$ & 0.27% & 5.5% & 0.05 & 1.9% & 5.8% & 0.05\
We list the fractional deviations of the MSSM Higgs observables from their SM values at the “Phase 2 sample point” $M_A = 1302.4$ GeV and $\tan\beta = 20$, which lies on the $\Delta \chi^2 = 25$ contour from experimental uncertainties only and yields $m_h = 129.3$ GeV. The relevant observables deviate by roughly 2% to 4% from their SM values at this sample point, except for $\sigma \times$BR($\gamma\gamma$) which is very close to its SM value. Ignoring the parametric and theoretical uncertainties, the biggest contribution to the $\Delta \chi^2$ comes from the best-measured observable, $\sigma \times {\rm BR}(b \bar b)$, followed by $\sigma \times {\rm BR}(gg)$ and $\sigma \times {\rm BR}(WW)$. The contribution of the branching fraction measurements from 350 GeV running to the $\Delta \chi^2$ is small.
Including the theoretical and parametric uncertainties severely degrades the precision of the three most important measurements, $\sigma \times {\rm BR}(b \bar b)$, $\sigma \times {\rm BR}(WW)$, and $\sigma \times {\rm BR}(gg)$, reducing the $\Delta \chi^2$ dramatically from 25 down to 1.7 at the sample point. This $\Delta \chi^2$ is somewhat worse than the value of 3.2 that would be obtained by summing the squares of the pulls in Table \[tab:phase2pulls\]; this is again due to the effect of the off-diagonal elements in the correlation matrix, including the correlations between the Phase 1 branching ratio measurements and the Phase 2 rate measurements.
Discussion and conclusions {#sec:conclusions}
==========================
We studied the impact of the theoretical and parametric uncertainties in the SM predictions for Higgs production and decay on the ability of the ILC to reveal deviations from the SM Higgs. To quantify the impact of the theoretical and parametric uncertainties, we compared the SM predictions for Higgs observables to those in the $m_h^{\rm max}$ benchmark scenario of the MSSM. We plotted $\Delta \chi^2 = 25$ contours for the deviations between the SM and MSSM Higgs observables both with and without the theory uncertainties, given the expected precisions on Higgs measurements at a future ILC. We found that the impact of the theoretical and parametric uncertainties is moderate in the first phase of ILC data-taking (500 fb$^{-1}$ at 350 GeV centre-of-mass energy), reducing the reach in the CP-odd MSSM Higgs mass $M_A$ by about 10% to $\sim 500$ GeV, while in the second phase (1000 fb$^{-1}$ at 1000 GeV) these uncertainties are larger than the experimental uncertainties and reduce the reach in $M_A$ by about a factor of two, from $\sim 1200$ down to $\sim 600$ GeV. The bulk of the effect comes from the parametric uncertainties in $m_b$ and $\alpha_s$, followed by the theoretical uncertainty in $\Gamma_b$. The theoretical uncertainty in $\Gamma_g$ is also important for lower Higgs masses below about 120–125 GeV.
The single most important source of theoretical or parametric uncertainty is the bottom quark mass. In our analysis we used the measurement of $m_b$ from a global fit to inclusive semileptonic $B$ meson decay spectra [@Buchmuller] (see Appendix \[app:mbmc\] for details). This is currently the best measurement of $m_b$; its uncertainty of 0.95% is dominated by the theoretical uncertainties in the fit. The large impact of this parametric uncertainty on Higgs observables is due to [*(i)*]{} the effective 2.6 power with which $\overline{m_b}(M_b)$ enters $\Gamma_b$, [*(ii)*]{} the importance of the $b \bar b$ final state in ILC Higgs measurements, and [*(iii)*]{} the fact that the deviations of the MSSM Higgs couplings from their SM values show up largely in the $b$ and $\tau$ sectors. The impact of the uncertainty in $m_b$ on the long-term ILC Higgs program highlights the need for further theoretical work on the $m_b$ extraction from $B$ meson observables.
The second most important source of theoretical or parametric uncertainty is $\alpha_s(m_Z)$. In our analysis we used the world-average PDG value [@PDG] with an uncertainty of 0.0020 or 1.7%. This measurement is expected to be improved by at least a factor of two at the ILC through precision measurements of event shape observables, the cross section ratio $\sigma_{t \bar
t}/\sigma_{\mu^+\mu^-}$ above the $t \bar t$ threshold, and $\Gamma_Z^{\rm had}/\Gamma_Z^{\rm lept}$ at the $Z$ pole (via the GigaZ option) [@TeslaTDR]. We illustrate the effect of improving the uncertainty on $\alpha_s(m_Z)$ to 0.0009 or 0.76% [@TeslaTDR] in Fig. \[fig:als\].
By itself this improvement has a relatively small effect because the uncertainty is still dominated by $m_b$; however, if the $m_b$ extraction becomes significantly more precise, the improvement in $\alpha_s$ will be valuable.
The measurement of BR($cc$) did not contribute significantly to the $\Delta \chi^2$ because of its relatively poor experimental precision, particularly at the higher Higgs masses $\sim 125$–130 GeV that appear over most of the $m_h^{\rm max}$ parameter space. Even if the ILC measurement were to be improved, however, the parametric uncertainties in $\overline{m_c}(M_c)$ and $\alpha_s(m_Z)$ lead to a large uncertainty in the SM prediction for BR($cc$) – 16% at our sample points – limiting the usefulness of this mode for model discrimination. The charm mass is by far the dominant uncertainty here, contributing 14.6%, while $\alpha_s$ contributes 6.4%. Note however that the theoretical improvements in $B$ meson decays required to reduce the uncertainty in $m_b$ will also reduce the uncertainty in $m_c$.
We also note here that the theoretical calculation of higher-order QCD corrections to $H \to gg$ includes processes in which one of the final-state gluons splits into a $c \bar c$ or $b \bar b$ pair. Determining which part of these processes should be included in the $H
\to gg$ branching fraction and which in the $H \to c \bar c$ or $b
\bar b$ branching fractions will require interaction between the theoretical and experimental studies. The impact of this splitting on the $b \bar b$ final state is small, but it could potentially shift the numbers of events tagged as $c \bar c$ or $gg$ by tens of percent (see the end of Appendix \[sec:Hgg\] for details). We have not attempted to address this question here.
To understand the effect of the correlated uncertainties, we recall that for large $\tan\beta$, $\Gamma_b$ and $\Gamma_{\tau}$ exhibit the largest deviations from their SM values, while $\Gamma_W$ approaches its SM value very quickly with increasing $M_A$ \[Eq. (\[eq:deviations\])\]. The largest parametric and theoretical uncertainties appear in the hadronic decay widths of the Higgs. At the same time, the most precisely measured observables in Phase 2 of the ILC are $\sigma \times {\rm BR}(bb)$ and $\sigma \times {\rm BR}(gg)$, which suffer directly from the parametric and theoretical uncertainties, and $\sigma \times {\rm BR}(WW)$, which is affected indirectly through the Higgs total width. Adding a high-precision measurement of $\sigma \times {\rm BR}(\tau\tau)$ would allow a tight constraint on the MSSM Higgs unpolluted by the dominant uncertainties. This mode is affected by the parametric and theoretical uncertainties indirectly through the Higgs total width in the same way as $\sigma \times {\rm BR}(WW)$, so that the ratio of these two non-hadronic modes is relatively clean. Further, $\Gamma_{\tau}$ exhibits a large deviation from its SM value in the MSSM \[see Eq. (\[eq:deviations\])\], leading to good potential sensitivity to the MSSM nature of the Higgs.
To illustrate the potential improvement, we first note that for $m_H$ between 120 and 140 GeV, the experimental uncertainties in the $b \bar
b$, $WW$, and $gg$ final states improve by factors of 5–6, 4–5, and 3.5–5.5, respectively, between Phase 1 and Phase 2 (see Tables \[tab:p1uncert\] and \[tab:p2uncert\]). We thus expect that an improvement in the $\tau\tau$ final state in Phase 2 by a factor of about four should be reasonable, and show the impact of a measurement of $\sigma \times {\rm BR}(\tau\tau)$ with an uncertainty of 1.3% (2.0%) at $m_H = 120$ (140) GeV in Fig. \[fig:tau\].
The effect of such a measurement on the reach in $M_A$ including only experimental uncertainties is minor, because the precision assumed here is not particularly high compared to that of $\sigma \times {\rm BR}(bb)$ and $\sigma \times {\rm BR}(WW)$. However, the impact on the reach including parametric and theoretical uncertainties is quite significant, improving the reach from $\sim 600$ GeV to $\sim 800$ GeV. A measurement of $\sigma \times {\rm BR}(\tau\tau)$ would require a different selection than used in Ref. [@Barklow], which required the visible energy in the event to add up to the Higgs mass; in the case of $H \to \tau\tau$, some energy is lost through the neutrinos in the $\tau$ decays.
As the experimental studies for the ILC Higgs measurements are refined, we hope that the correlations among the experimental uncertainties in different channels will be quantified. In particular, we expect the hadronic decay modes $H \to gg$, $b \bar b$ and $c \bar c$ to be correlated, because the separation of these three channels relies on bottom and charm tagging. Because the shifts in Higgs observables in particular models are correlated due to the model structure, we expect the correlations in the experimental uncertainties to be important for evaluating model distinguishability. Once these correlated uncertainties are available, including them in a $\chi^2$ framework will be straightforward.
We used the $m_h^{\rm max}$ benchmark scenario of the MSSM to quantify the impact of the theoretical and parametric uncertainties. Our analysis can be extended in a straightforward way to Higgs coupling comparisons in other scenarios of the MSSM and to other beyond-the-SM Higgs sectors. Such a study would be interesting because the characteristic deviations from the SM in different extended models may appear in different channels than for the MSSM $m_h^{\rm max}$ scenario, so that the relative importance of the various Higgs measurements will differ. Further, the shifts in the observables predicted in different extended Higgs models may pull in different directions relative to the correlations in the uncertainties in the SM predictions.
We are grateful to Tim Barklow and Klaus Desch for clarifying the experimental studies of Higgs production and decay at the ILC, to Stefan Dittmaier for an enlightening discussion on the high-precision calculation of the $e^+e^- \to \nu \bar \nu H$ cross section, and to Thomas Becher, Andre Hoang, Andreas Kronfeld and Frank Petriello for useful conversations on the bottom and charm quark mass uncertainties. This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Theoretical uncertainties in Higgs decay partial widths {#app:thy}
=======================================================
The radiative corrections to Higgs decays have been reviewed in Ref. [@Spirareview]; we give here a brief sketch of the known corrections. The theory uncertainties used in our analysis were summarized in Table \[tab:thyuncert\].
$H \to q \bar q$
----------------
The QCD corrections to $H \to q \bar q$ are known up to three loops (N$^3$LO) [@Braaten:1980yq; @Gorishnii:1990zu; @Chetyrkin:1995pd] for massless final-state quarks. A compact formula in the $\overline{\rm MS}$ scheme is given in Ref. [@Spirareview]: $$\Gamma(H \to q\bar q) = \frac{3 G_F m_H}{4\sqrt{2}\pi} \overline{m}_q^2(m_H)
\left[ \Delta_{\rm QCD} + \Delta_t \right],
\label{eq:GH2qq}$$ where $$\begin{aligned}
\Delta_{\rm QCD} &=& 1 + 5.67 \frac{\alpha_s(m_H)}{\pi}
+ (35.94 - 1.36 N_F) \left( \frac{\alpha_s(m_H)}{\pi} \right)^2
\nonumber \\
& & + (164.14 - 25.77 N_F + 0.259 N_F^2)
\left( \frac{\alpha_s(m_H)}{\pi} \right)^3
\nonumber \\
&\simeq & 1 + 0.20 + 0.04 + 0.003
\nonumber \\
\Delta_t &=& \left( \frac{\alpha_s(m_H)}{\pi} \right)^2
\left[ 1.57 - \frac{2}{3} \log \frac{m_H^2}{M_t^2}
+ \frac{1}{9} \log^2 \frac{\overline{m}_q^2(m_H)}{m_H^2} \right]
\nonumber \\
&\simeq & 0.02.
\label{eq:DeltaHqq}\end{aligned}$$ In this calculation, the $\overline {\rm MS}$ running quark masses $\overline{m_q}(M_q)$ evaluated at the quark pole mass $M_q$ are taken as a starting point and then run up to the Higgs mass scale using the standard QCD running in order to absorb large logarithms. The coefficient functions for the running of the quark masses are known to four-loop accuracy [@Chetyrkin:1997dh], as is the beta-function for the running of $\alpha_s$ [@vanRitbergen:1997va]. We thus estimate the uncertainty in the partial width from the running of $\overline{m}_q(m_H)$ to be well below the 0.01% level.
The perturbative expansion for $\Delta_{\rm QCD}$ in Eq. (\[eq:DeltaHqq\]) is well under control; $\Delta_t$ appears at NNLO and is roughly the same size as the NNLO term in $\Delta_{\rm QCD}$. We thus estimate the uncertainty from uncalculated higher-order QCD corrections to be smaller than the last calculated term in each series: $\sim 0.1\%$ from $\Delta_{\rm QCD}$ and $\sim 1\%$ from $\Delta_t$.
We note here that an additional contribution to $H \to q \bar q$ can come from $H \to gg^*$ with the off-shell gluon splitting to $q \bar q$; we have *not* included these effects in our calculations. See Sec. \[sec:Hgg\] for further discussion.
For Higgs decays to heavy quarks near the threshold region, the quark pole mass dependence must be included through the usual $\beta^3 = (1
- 4 M_q^2/m_H^2)^{3/2}$ factor. The NLO QCD corrections for massive quarks are known [@Braaten:1980yq], as is the $\mathcal{O}(N_f
\alpha_s^2)$ piece of the massive NNLO corrections [@Melnikov:1995yp]. [HDECAY]{} uses a linear interpolation between the NLO massive and the N$^3$LO massless results near the threshold region [@Spirareview]. For $m_H \sim 120$ GeV, the quark mass effects decrease the $H \to b \bar b$ ($c \bar c$) partial width by about 0.7% (0.1%). We estimate the remaining uncertainty from quark mass effects in the QCD corrections to be below the 0.01% level.
The electroweak corrections to the Higgs decay into fermion pairs are known at one loop [@Fleischer:1980ub; @Bardin:1990zj]; a convenient approximation formula is given in Refs. [@Djouadi:1991uf; @Spirareview]. The QED corrections include a large logarithm $\log(m_H^2/M_q^2)$, which can be absorbed into the running fermion mass as in QCD. The electroweak corrections also include a top-mass-dependent piece which increases the $H \to q \bar q$ partial width by about 2.2% for decays to $c \bar c$ and by 0.3% for decays to $b \bar b$ (the difference is due to the vertex correction involving a top quark in the case of $b \bar b$, which partly cancels the universal correction). In addition, the two- and three-loop QCD corrections to the top-mass-dependent piece of the electroweak correction are known [@Kniehl:1994ju; @Chetyrkin:1996wr]. Their numerical size depends on the scheme chosen to define the running $\alpha_s$ and top quark mass [@Chetyrkin:1996wr]; a suitable choice gives a *relative* correction to the top-mass-dependent piece of the NLO electroweak correction of 8% (two-loop) and 1% (three-loop). The remaining electroweak corrections are comparable in size, i.e., at the percent level. We thus estimate the remaining theoretical uncertainty from higher-order electroweak and mixed electroweak/QCD corrections to be smaller by a loop factor $\sim \alpha/\pi$, i.e., at the level of 0.01%.
For large Higgs masses, electroweak corrections due to the Higgs self-coupling become relevant. These were calculated in Ref. [@Ghinculov:1994se] and can increase $\Gamma_{q \bar q}$ by about 2% for $m_H \sim 1$ TeV. For a 120 GeV Higgs, they increase $\Gamma_{q \bar q}$ by about 0.2% at NLO and by another $-0.002\%$ at NNLO. Any remaining uncertainty from higher orders in the Higgs self-coupling is thus totally negligible in the intermediate Higgs mass range.
We thus estimate the theory uncertainty in $\Gamma_{b \bar b}$ and $\Gamma_{c \bar c}$ to be at the 1% level, primarily from the $\Delta_t$ piece of the QCD corrections.
$H \to \ell^+ \ell^-$
---------------------
Higgs decays to leptons receive the same electroweak corrections as the decays to quarks discussed in the previous section. As mentioned previously, we estimate that the theoretical uncertainty is at the level of two-loop electroweak corrections $\sim (\alpha/\pi)^2 \sim 0.01\%$.
$H \to WW$, $ZZ$
----------------
For Higgs masses below the $WW$ threshold, decays with one or both gauge bosons off-shell are important, with branching ratios for the doubly off-shell decays reaching the percent level for Higgs masses above about 100–110 GeV [@Spirareview]. Until recently, calculations for off-shell vector bosons were only available at tree level, and radiative corrections to Higgs decays to $WW$ and $ZZ$ were known only in the narrow-width approximation. In this approximation, the one-loop electroweak corrections [@Fleischer:1980ub; @Kniehl:1990mq; @Kniehl:1991xe; @Bardin:1991dp] amount to about 5% or less in the intermediate mass range [@Spirareview]. Furthermore, the QCD corrections to the leading top-mass-enhanced electroweak corrections of $\mathcal{O}(\alpha_s G_F m_t^2)$ have been calculated at two [@Kniehl:1995tn; @Kniehl:1995gj] and three [@Kniehl:1995br; @Kniehl:1995at] loops; these mixed electroweak/QCD corrections amount to roughly 0.5%. [HDECAY]{} takes into account both singly off-shell and doubly off-shell decays at tree level but neglects these electroweak and mixed corrections [@Spirareview].
Recently the complete NLO strong and electroweak radiative corrections for $H \to WW/ZZ \to 4 f$ have been calculated including the effects of off-shell gauge bosons [@Bredenstein:2006rh; @Bredenstein:2006ha]. The calculation was improved by including final-state photon radiation off the fermions, resummed using a structure function approach, as well as higher-order corrections due to the Higgs self-coupling relevant for large Higgs masses [@Ghinculov:1995bz; @Frink:1996sv], which increase the decay width for a 120 GeV Higgs by about 0.2% at NLO and by another 0.003% at NNLO. The complete calculation has been implemented in the Monte Carlo generator [PROPHECY4F]{} [@Bredenstein:2006rh; @Bredenstein:2006ha]. For Higgs masses below 400 GeV, the theoretical uncertainty is below 1%; for our study we estimate the theory uncertainty in $\Gamma_{WW}$ and $\Gamma_{ZZ}$ in the intermediate Higgs mass range to be at the 0.5% level [@Dittmaier-private].
$H \to gg$ {#sec:Hgg}
----------
The decay $H \to gg$ appears first at one-loop mediated by a quark triangle. The top quark loop dominates the amplitude because it contributes proportional to the large top Yukawa coupling $y_t = g
m_t/\sqrt{2} m_W \sim 1$. The bottom quark loop is also included in [HDECAY]{}; it reduces the $H \to gg$ partial width by about 11% for $m_H = 120$ GeV compared to including the top loop alone. We note that [HDECAY]{} v.3.103 [@HDECAY] (downloaded June 2006) includes the charm quark loop in the calculation of the MSSM $h^0 \to
gg$ partial width, but not in the calculation of the SM $H \to gg$ partial width. For consistency, we add the charm loop into the SM $H
\to gg$ calculation; it reduces $\Gamma_{gg}$ by about 2% for $m_H =
120$ GeV.[^3]
The QCD corrections to $H \to gg$ are most easily calculated in the heavy quark limit, in which $m_t \to \infty$ is taken in the leading-order top triangle diagram (the amplitude goes to a constant in this limit). This allows the top triangle to be shrunk to a point and replaced with an effective coupling of the Higgs to two gluons. [HDECAY]{} includes the NLO QCD correction to $\Gamma_{gg}$ in this heavy quark limit only; in the intermediate Higgs mass range this correction shifts $\Gamma_{gg}$ upward by about 60–65% relative to the leading-order (LO) partial width. The NLO QCD corrections with full dependence on the mass of the quark in the loop are known [@Spira:1995rr]; in the intermediate Higgs mass range, including the full mass dependence shifts $\Gamma_{gg}$ upward by an additional 5% of the LO width [@Spirareview]. This mass-dependent part of the correction is not included in [HDECAY]{}.
The NNLO QCD correction is known only in the heavy quark limit [@Chetyrkin:1997iv]; it adds an additional 20% to the LO result. Very recently, the N$^3$LO QCD corrections to $\Gamma_{gg}$ have been computed [@Baikov:2006ch], again in the heavy quark limit; they add another 2% to the LO result. By varying the renormalization scale between $m_H/2$ and $2 m_H$, a measure of the theoretical uncertainty of the calculation can be estimated: the scale dependence decreases from 24% (LO) to 22% (NLO) to 10% (NNLO), and finally to only 3% at N$^3$LO [@Baikov:2006ch]. Neglecting the mass dependence of the NLO correction and neglecting the NNLO and N$^3$LO corrections entirely leaves [HDECAY]{} with about a 16% relative uncertainty on the calculated NLO partial width.
The electroweak corrections of $\mathcal{O}(G_F m_t^2)$ to $H \to gg$ were calculated in [@Djouadi:1994ge] in the heavy-top approximation and they give a simple multiplicative factor which increases the gluonic decay width by about 0.3%. We thus expect the NNLO electroweak corrections and the NLO finite-top-mass effects to be below the per-mille level. This NLO electroweak correction is neglected in [HDECAY]{}.
We thus take the remaining theory uncertainty in $\Gamma_{gg}$ to be roughly 3%, corresponding to the scale uncertainty in the N$^3$LO QCD calculation.
Finally, we note here a potential issue for the theoretical interpretation of Higgs partial width measurements that requires further study. Theoretical calculations of the higher-order QCD corrections to $H \to gg$ include processes in which one of the final-state gluons splits into a quark-antiquark pair. The [HDECAY]{} code contains a switch that allows the user to specify the number of final-state quark flavours included in $\Gamma_{gg}$; setting [NF-GG = 5]{} includes the five light quark flavours in $\Gamma_{gg}$, while [NF-GG = 4]{} separates off the contribution from gluon splitting to $b \bar b$ and adds it in to $\Gamma_{b \bar b}$. [NF-GG = 3]{} does the same for gluon splitting to $c \bar c$ as well.
Compared to [NF-GG = 5]{} and for $m_H = 120$ GeV, subtracting off the gluon splitting to $b \bar b$ and adding it to $\Gamma_{b \bar b}$ (i.e., [NF-GG = 4]{}) raises $\Gamma_{b \bar b}$ by about 1% and reduces $\Gamma_{gg}$ by about 9%. Subtracting off the gluon splitting to $c \bar c$ and adding it to $\Gamma_{c \bar c}$ (i.e., [NF-GG = 3]{}) raises $\Gamma_{c \bar c}$ by almost 30% and reduces $\Gamma_{gg}$ by a further 12%. These effects are quite significant compared to the expected experimental precision in the $gg$ and $c \bar c$ channels. The amount of this gluon splitting correction that should be subtracted off of $\Gamma_{gg}$ and included in $\Gamma_{b \bar b}$ or $\Gamma_{c \bar c}$ is an experimental question requiring a more detailed simulation of flavour tagging of Higgs decays into three-body final states. In our study we set [NF-GG = 5]{} throughout and ignore this issue.
$H \to \gamma\gamma$
--------------------
The SM $H \to \gamma\gamma$ decay partial width receives QCD corrections to the one-loop diagrams involving quarks. Because the external particles in the $H \gamma\gamma$ vertex are colour neutral, the virtual QCD corrections are finite by themselves. The QCD corrections to the top quark loop in $\Gamma_{\gamma\gamma}$ are known analytically at NLO [@ggH2loopQCD] and as a power expansion up to third order in $m_H/m_t$ at NNLO [@ggH3loopQCD]. The NLO corrections are of order 2% for $m_H < 2 m_W$, and the NNLO corrections are at the level of a few per mille. These QCD corrections are neglected [@Spirareview] in [HDECAY]{}.
$\Gamma_{\gamma\gamma}$ also receives electroweak corrections, the complete set of which have been calculated at NLO neglecting the Yukawa couplings of all fermions except the top quark. The complete calculation consists of the two-loop diagrams containing light fermion loops and $W$ or $Z$ bosons (with the Higgs coupled to the $W$ or $Z$, because the light fermion Yukawa couplings are neglected) [@Aglietti]; the two-loop diagrams involving third-generation quarks and electroweak bosons [@ggHEWGFmt2; @ggHEWGFmt2old; @Maltoni]; and the purely bosonic corrections [@Maltoni]. Together, these NLO electroweak corrections are between $-4\%$ and $0\%$ for 100 GeV $\lesssim m_H \lesssim 150$ GeV. These electroweak corrections are neglected [@Spirareview] in [HDECAY]{}.
The corrections to the part of the $H \to \gamma \gamma$ amplitude involving the Higgs coupling to light quarks (e.g., $b$) have not been computed. However, since the leading order contribution of the $b$ quark loop to $\Gamma_{\gamma\gamma}$ is at the few percent level, and the QCD and electroweak radiative corrections are themselves at the few percent level of the leading order piece, we estimate these uncalculated two-loop corrections to be at most at the per-mille level. We thus take the remaining theoretical uncertainty in $\Gamma_{\gamma\gamma}$ to be of order 0.1%.
$H \to Z \gamma$
----------------
Like $H \to \gamma\gamma$, the SM $H \to Z\gamma$ decay partial width receives QCD corrections to the one-loop diagrams involving quarks. These corrections were given in Ref. [@Spira:1991tj] including the full dependence on the Higgs, $Z$ and top quark masses. They amount to less than 0.3% in the intermediate Higgs mass range [@Spirareview] and have been neglected in [HDECAY]{}.
In analogy with the $H \to \gamma\gamma$ process, we expect the two-loop electroweak corrections to $\Gamma_{Z\gamma}$ to be at the few-percent level; we thus take an overall theory uncertainty of 4% for the $H \to Z \gamma$ mode.
Theoretical uncertainty in the $e^+e^- \to \nu \bar \nu H$ production cross section {#app:xsec}
===================================================================================
The full one-loop electroweak radiative corrections to Higgs production via $e^+e^- \to \nu \bar \nu H$ have been calculated in Refs. [@Belanger; @Dittmaier1; @Dittmaier2]. For the experimental selection used in the 1000 GeV centre-of-mass energy ILC studies [@Barklow], the processes $e^+e^- \to \nu_{\ell} \bar \nu_{\ell} H$ ($\ell = e, \mu, \tau$) arising from both $WW$ fusion and Higgsstrahlung contribute, with $WW$ fusion dominating. The one-loop electroweak corrections to these processes reduce the cross section by about 10% [@Dittmaier1; @Dittmaier2] in the parameter range of interest to us.
Beyond one loop, the $e^+e^- \to \nu \bar \nu H$ cross section will receive additional electroweak and QCD corrections. We estimate the missing two-loop electroweak corrections to be roughly of order (one-loop)$^2$. The largest electroweak corrections are due to initial-state radiation, which is already computed in the leading-log approximation up to order $\alpha^3$ [@Dittmaier2]. The remaining purely weak one-loop corrections are of order 3–4% [@Dittmaier2], leading us to estimate a (one-loop)$^2$ uncertainty of about 0.1–0.2%. At two loops, QCD corrections will affect only the fermionic component of the one-loop electroweak corrections; this fermionic component amounts to about a 2% reduction of the total cross section in our parameter region of interest [@Dittmaier1], so we estimate the QCD correction at two loops to be of order 0.2%. At TeV energies one should also consider the enhanced effects that often occur in high-energy ($E \gg m_W$) processes, such as logarithmic running of couplings and soft or collinear weak boson exchange; these effects can be at the percent level even at two loops. However, the $t$-channel weak boson fusion process of interest here is dominated by small energy transfers, so that we do not expect these effects to exceed the 0.1% level. For a relatively light Higgs mass $m_H \sim 120$–140 GeV the Higgs self-coupling is relatively small, so that we should also be safe from large corrections due to Higgs self-interaction diagrams at the two-loop level.
We thus estimate a combined theory uncertainty on the $e^+e^- \to \nu
\bar \nu H$ cross section at 1000 GeV centre-of-mass energy of 0.5% [@Dittmaier-private]. We emphasize that this is just a “reasonable” estimate; to make this number really solid would require a serious study of the size of the two-loop effects mentioned above.
Uncertainties in $\overline{m_b}(\overline{m_b})$ and $\overline{m_c}(\overline{m_c})$ {#app:mbmc}
======================================================================================
The predictions for the Higgs partial widths into bottom or charm quark pairs are computed up to three loops in terms of the $\overline{\rm MS}$ quark masses evaluated at the scale of the Higgs mass. As input, the calculation requires the bottom and charm quark $\overline{\rm MS}$ masses at a starting scale such as the quark’s own mass: $\overline{m_b}(\overline{m_b})$ and $\overline{m_c}(\overline{m_c})$. We summarize here the various ways that $\overline{m_b}(\overline{m_b})$ and $\overline{m_c}(\overline{m_c})$ have been extracted; the masses obtained are summarized in Tables \[tab:mc\] and \[tab:mb\].
Source $\overline{m_c}(\overline{m_c})$ \[GeV\]
---------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------
Inclusive semileptonic $B$ decays
via $m_b^{\rm 1S}$ and $m_b-m_c$ [@HoangBsl] $1.224 \pm 0.057$ ($*$)
via kinetic masses [@Buchmuller] $1.24 \pm 0.07$
$e^+e^- \to$ hadrons
from spectral moments [@Kuhneehad] $1.304 \pm 0.027$
more conservative error analysis [@Hoangeehad] $1.29 \pm 0.07$
Quenched lattice QCD
from $F_K$ and $D_s$ mass [@RolfLattice] $1.301 \pm 0.034$ $\pm$ ??
from $\bar c c$ and $\bar c s$ state masses [@DivitiisLattice] $1.319 \pm 0.028$ $\pm$ ??
Unquenched lattice QCD
meson spectra (prelim) [@NobesLattice] $1.22 \pm 0.09$
: $\overline{\rm MS}$ charm quark masses, $\overline{m_c}(\overline{m_c})$, from recent analyses (see text for details). In our study we use the charm mass extracted from inclusive semileptonic $B$ decays [@HoangBsl], marked with an asterisk ($*$) in the table. For quenched lattice QCD the question marks ?? denote the uncontrolled uncertainty due to the quenched approximation.[]{data-label="tab:mc"}
Source $\overline{m_b}(\overline{m_b})$ \[GeV\]
---------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------
Inclusive semileptonic $B$ decays
via kinetic masses [@Buchmuller] $4.20 \pm 0.04$ ($*$)
$e^+e^- \to$ hadrons
from spectral moments [@Kuhneehad] $4.191 \pm 0.051$
more conservative error analysis [@Hoangeehad] $4.22 \pm 0.11$
Quenched lattice QCD
from $\bar b b$ and $\bar b s$ state masses [@DivitiisLattice] $4.33 \pm 0.10$ $\pm$ ??
Unquenched lattice QCD
$\Upsilon$ spectrum [@GrayLattice] $4.4 \pm 0.3$
meson spectra (prelim) [@NobesLattice] $4.7 \pm 0.4$
: $\overline{\rm MS}$ bottom quark masses, $\overline{m_b}(\overline{m_b})$, from recent analyses (see text for details). In our study we use the bottom mass extracted from inclusive semileptonic $B$ decays [@Buchmuller], marked with an asterisk ($*$) in the table. For quenched lattice QCD the question marks ?? denote the uncontrolled uncertainty due to the quenched approximation.[]{data-label="tab:mb"}
Extracting the precise values of the charm and bottom quark masses from experiment is a challenge because of QCD effects which are starting to become strong at the bottom and charm mass scales. In particular, perturbative QCD does not allow one to define the quark pole masses with an accuracy better than $\Lambda_{\rm QCD} \sim 200$ MeV; this is known as the renormalon ambiguity.[^4] Because the $\overline{\rm MS}$ quark masses are short-distance mass definitions, they are in principle free of this ambiguity.
Inclusive semileptonic $B$ decays
---------------------------------
The charm mass has recently been extracted [@HoangBsl] from a global fit to $B$ meson decay spectra [@BauerBsl]. The procedure combines the values of $m_b-m_c$ and $m_b^{\rm 1S}$ from a fit of the decay spectra of $B \to X_c \ell \bar \nu$ and $B \to X_s \gamma$ to a Heavy Quark Effective Theory (HQET) expansion performed in Ref. [@BauerBsl]. The proper treatment of the renormalon cancellation was done in Ref. [@HoangBsl] to extract the charm mass $\overline{m_c}(\overline{m_c}) = 1.224 \pm 0.017_{\rm expt}
\pm 0.054_{\rm thy}$ GeV, where the first error is experimental and includes the uncertainty in $\alpha_s$ and the second error represents a conservative combination of the theory uncertainties in the extraction [@HoangBsl]. While this theory uncertainty is not meant to be interpreted as a statistical uncertainty (it represents a range where the true charm mass should be located with probability much higher than the 67% probability of a 1$\sigma$ interval), we will nevertheless treat it as a 1$\sigma$ Gaussian error and combine it in quadrature with the experimental error for inclusion in our $\chi^2$ fits. For our analysis we thus take a charm mass of $$\overline{m_c}(\overline{m_c}) = 1.224 \pm 0.057 \ {\rm GeV}.$$ The quoted uncertainty amounts to a 4.7% relative uncertainty, which is dominated by the theoretical uncertainty. The theoretical uncertainty could be improved in the future by a full $\mathcal{O}(\alpha_s^2)$ analysis of the inclusive $B$ decay spectra used in the extraction, to reduce the theoretical uncertainty in the fit to the HQET parameters.
The charm quark mass has also been extracted in Ref. [@Buchmuller] through a similar fit to the $B \to X_c \ell \bar \nu$ and $B \to X_s \gamma$ decay distributions using HQET expansions in the kinetic scheme, yielding kinetic masses $m_b$ and $m_c$ which are converted to $\overline{\rm MS}$ masses using a formula from Ref. [@Bigi], accurate to two loops and including part of the three-loop $\alpha_s^3$ corrections. The resulting $\overline{\rm MS}$ charm mass is $\overline{m_c}(\overline{m_c}) = 1.24 \pm 0.07$ GeV. This is consistent within the uncertainties with the charm mass found in Ref. [@HoangBsl].
The fits of the $B \to X_c \ell \bar \nu$ and $B \to X_s \gamma$ decay distributions to HQET expansions are also used to extract the bottom quark mass. The extraction can be done using any of a variety of different schemes for the HQET expansions [@BauerBsl]; however, some schemes are better than others in the sense that they suffer from smaller theoretical uncertainties. Currently the smallest uncertainty comes with the bottom mass extraction in the $1S$ scheme, $m_b^{1S} = 4.68 \pm 0.03$ GeV [@BauerBsl], an uncertainty of only 0.64%. The bottom mass has also been extracted [@BauerBsl; @Buchmuller] in the kinetic scheme discussed above for the charm mass extraction. As for the charm quark, the kinetic bottom quark mass can be translated into an $\overline{\rm MS}$ mass using the formula from Ref. [@Bigi]. Following this procedure, Ref. [@Buchmuller] finds for the $\overline{\rm MS}$ mass, $$\overline{m_b}(\overline{m_b}) = 4.20 \pm 0.04 \ {\rm GeV}.$$ We use this mass in our analysis. The relative uncertainty is 0.95%, and is dominated by the theoretical uncertainties that feed into the fit errors.
$e^+e^- \to$ hadrons
--------------------
The inclusive cross section for $e^+e^- \to$ hadrons as a function of the centre-of-mass energy is sensitive to the fundamental parameters of QCD, including the quark masses. In particular, precise perturbative QCD calculations of the first few “moments” of the cross section, which depend heavily on the threshold region, allow a precise determination of the $\overline{\rm MS}$ charm and bottom quark masses.
The moments $P_n = \int R_{q \bar q}(s) s^{-(n+1)} ds$, where $R_{q \bar q} = \sigma(e^+e^- \to q \bar q + X) /
\sigma(e^+e^- \to \mu^+\mu^-)$ and $q = c$ or $b$, are obtained experimentally from measurements of the production cross section near the $c \bar c$ and $b \bar b$ thresholds. Experimental uncertainties include gaps in the data above the quarkonium resonance regions and uncertainties in the large contributions from the narrow quarkonium resonances [@Corcellaeehad]. The quark masses are extracted by matching the experimentally determined moments to theoretical predictions. The uncertainties on the theory side include the unknown higher-order QCD contributions to the moments, which manifest both as scale dependence within a single scheme and differing results for the quark masses depending on how the renormalization scale is chosen as a function of the $e^+e^-$ centre-of-mass energy [@Hoangeehad].
A recent fit [@Kuhneehad] found $\overline{m_c}(\overline{m_c}) = 1.304 \pm 0.027$ GeV and $\overline{m_b}(\overline{m_b}) = 4.191 \pm 0.051$ GeV. This remarkably small error estimate for $m_c$ was reconsidered in Refs. [@Corcellaeehad; @Hoangeehad], with special attention being paid to sources of theory uncertainty, resulting in revised mass extractions of $\overline{m_c}(\overline{m_c}) = 1.29 \pm 0.07$ GeV and $\overline{m_b}(\overline{m_b}) = 4.22 \pm 0.11$ GeV [@Hoangeehad].
Very recently the first moment of the hadronic production cross section was computed at $\mathcal{O}(\alpha_s^3)$ [@Chetyrkineehad; @Boughezaleehad], significantly reducing the renormalization scale dependence. Repeating the analysis of Ref. [@Kuhneehad], Ref. [@Boughezaleehad] finds $\overline{m_c}(\overline{m_c}) = 1.295 \pm 0.015$ GeV and $\overline{m_b}(\overline{m_b}) = 4.205 \pm 0.058$ GeV. We await a more detailed examination of the theoretical uncertainties a la Refs. [@Corcellaeehad; @Hoangeehad] before making use of this very small uncertainty in $m_c$.
Lattice QCD
-----------
Lattice QCD allows the extraction of the quark masses through fits of the fundamental QCD parameters – $\alpha_s$ and the quark masses – to precisely-measured meson properties such as the kaon mass and decay constant $F_K$ (to set the QCD scale and the light quark masses) and the mass of the $D_s$ meson (to provide sensitivity to the charm quark mass) [@RolfLattice]. Adding $B$ mesons to the simulation allows access to the bottom quark mass [@DivitiisLattice]. The charm and bottom masses have been thus calculated in *quenched* lattice QCD, in which only virtual gluons are simulated and not virtual light-quark–antiquark pairs. Recent analyses find $\overline{m_c}(\overline{m_c}) = 1.301 \pm 0.034$ GeV [@RolfLattice] or $1.319 \pm 0.028$ GeV [@DivitiisLattice] and $\overline{m_b}(\overline{m_b}) = 4.33 \pm 0.10$ GeV [@DivitiisLattice]. However, quenched lattice QCD calculations suffer from an uncontrolled theoretical uncertainty due to the quenched approximation.
Unquenched lattice QCD simulations are significantly more computer-intensive and have only recently yielded significant results. The bottom quark mass in full (unquenched) lattice QCD was obtained for the first time in Ref. [@GrayLattice] from the $\Upsilon$ spectrum. The bare mass on the lattice was extracted with 1–2% uncertainty, which is mostly systematic and due to missing radiative corrections to the leading relativistic and discretization corrections to the $\Upsilon$ binding energies. The bare mass on the lattice depends on the lattice spacing, which cuts off the effective theory on the lattice; it can be converted to the $\overline{\rm MS}$ mass without encountering infrared problems. The conversion is done at one loop yielding $\overline{m_b}(\overline{m_b}) = 4.4 \pm 0.3$ GeV [@GrayLattice], where the error is dominated by the perturbative uncertainty in the conversion from the bare lattice mass. A two-loop calculation of the heavy quark self-energy to reduce the conversion error is underway [@GrayLattice]. Reducing the error in $\overline{m_b}(\overline{m_b})$ to the level of the uncertainty in the bare lattice mass would make the lattice determination of $\overline{m_b}(\overline{m_b})$ competitive with that from inclusive $B$ meson decay distributions discussed above. A similar (preliminary) analysis [@NobesLattice] including also the charm quark gives $\overline{m_c}(\overline{m_c}) = 1.22 \pm 0.09$ GeV and $\overline{m_b}(\overline{m_b}) = 4.7 \pm 0.4$ GeV. These masses are all in good agreement within their uncertainties with the charm and bottom masses found through other techniques.
[99]{}
J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra [*et al.*]{} \[ECFA/DESY LC Physics Working Group\], arXiv:hep-ph/0106315. T. Abe [*et al.*]{} \[American Linear Collider Working Group\], in [*Proc. of the APS/DPF/DPB Summer Study on the Future of Particle Physics (Snowmass 2001)* ]{} ed. N. Graf, arXiv:hep-ex/0106056. S. Heinemeyer [*et al.*]{}, arXiv:hep-ph/0511332. M. Battaglia, arXiv:hep-ph/9910271; M. Battaglia and K. Desch, arXiv:hep-ph/0101165. M. Carena, H. E. Haber, H. E. Logan and S. Mrenna, Phys. Rev. D [**65**]{}, 055005 (2002) \[Erratum-ibid. D [**65**]{}, 099902 (2002)\] \[arXiv:hep-ph/0106116\]. J. Kamoshita, Y. Okada and M. Tanaka, Phys. Lett. B [**391**]{}, 124 (1997) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9512307\]; S. Kiyoura and Y. Okada, arXiv:hep-ph/0101172. J. Guasch, W. Hollik and S. Penaranda, Phys. Lett. B [**515**]{}, 367 (2001) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0106027\]. S. Dawson and S. Heinemeyer, Phys. Rev. D [**66**]{}, 055002 (2002) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0203067\]. H. E. Logan, Phys. Rev. D [**70**]{}, 115003 (2004) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0405072\]. M. Carena, S. Heinemeyer, C. E. M. Wagner and G. Weiglein, Eur. Phys. J. C [**26**]{}, 601 (2003) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0202167\]. H. E. Haber, arXiv:hep-ph/9501320. For a review and references, see M. Carena and H. E. Haber, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. [**50**]{}, 63 (2003) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0208209\]. version 3.103 (August 2005): A. Djouadi, J. Kalinowski and M. Spira, Comput. Phys. Commun. [**108**]{}, 56 (1998) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9704448\]. Code available from `http://people.web.psi.ch/spira/hdecay/`.
K. Desch \[Higgs Working Group of the Extended ECFA/DESY Study\], arXiv:hep-ph/0311092. T. L. Barklow, arXiv:hep-ph/0312268. M. Spira, Fortsch. Phys. [**46**]{}, 203 (1998) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9705337\]. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, J. Fujimoto, T. Ishikawa, T. Kaneko, K. Kato and Y. Shimizu, Phys. Lett. B [**559**]{}, 252 (2003) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0212261\]. A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, M. Roth and M. M. Weber, Phys. Lett. B [**560**]{}, 196 (2003) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0301189\]. A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, M. Roth and M. M. Weber, Nucl. Phys. B [**660**]{}, 289 (2003) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0302198\]. S. Eidelman [*et al.*]{} \[Particle Data Group\], Phys. Lett. B [**592**]{}, 1 (2004).
O. Buchmüller and H. Flächer, Phys. Rev. D [**73**]{}, 073008 (2006) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0507253\]. A. H. Hoang and A. V. Manohar, Phys. Lett. B [**633**]{}, 526 (2006) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0509195\]. E. Braaten and J. P. Leveille, Phys. Rev. D [**22**]{}, 715 (1980); N. Sakai, Phys. Rev. D [**22**]{}, 2220 (1980); T. Inami and T. Kubota, Nucl. Phys. B [**179**]{}, 171 (1981); S. G. Gorishnii, A. L. Kataev and S. A. Larin, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. [**40**]{}, 329 (1984) \[Yad. Fiz. [**40**]{}, 517 (1984)\]; M. Drees and K. i. Hikasa, Phys. Rev. D [**41**]{}, 1547 (1990); M. Drees and K. i. Hikasa, Phys. Lett. B [**240**]{}, 455 (1990) \[Erratum-ibid. B [**262**]{}, 497 (1991)\]. S. G. Gorishnii, A. L. Kataev, S. A. Larin and L. R. Surguladze, Mod. Phys. Lett. A [**5**]{}, 2703 (1990); Phys. Rev. D [**43**]{}, 1633 (1991); A. L. Kataev and V. T. Kim, Mod. Phys. Lett. A [**9**]{}, 1309 (1994); L. R. Surguladze, Phys. Lett. B [**341**]{}, 60 (1994) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9405325\]; K. G. Chetyrkin, J. H. Kuhn and A. K. Kwiatkowski, arXiv:hep-ph/9407271; K. G. Chetyrkin, Phys. Lett. B [**390**]{}, 309 (1997) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9608318\]. K. G. Chetyrkin and A. Kwiatkowski, Nucl. Phys. B [**461**]{}, 3 (1996) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9505358\]; S. A. Larin, T. van Ritbergen and J. A. M. Vermaseren, Phys. Lett. B [**362**]{}, 134 (1995) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9506465\]. K. G. Chetyrkin, Phys. Lett. B [**404**]{}, 161 (1997) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9703278\]. T. van Ritbergen, J. A. M. Vermaseren and S. A. Larin, Phys. Lett. B [**400**]{}, 379 (1997) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9701390\]. K. Melnikov, Phys. Rev. D [**53**]{}, 5020 (1996) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9511310\]. J. Fleischer and F. Jegerlehner, Phys. Rev. D [**23**]{}, 2001 (1981). D. Y. Bardin, B. M. Vilensky and P. K. Khristova, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. [**53**]{}, 152 (1991) \[Yad. Fiz. [**53**]{}, 240 (1991)\]; A. Dabelstein and W. Hollik, Z. Phys. C [**53**]{}, 507 (1992); B. A. Kniehl, Nucl. Phys. B [**376**]{}, 3 (1992). A. Djouadi, D. Haidt, B. A. Kniehl, P. M. Zerwas and B. Mele, in the Proceedings of the Workshop on $e^+e^-$ Collisions at 500 GeV: The Physics Potential, Munich/Annecy/Hamburg 1991, ed. P.M. Zerwas, Report DESY 92-123A.
B. A. Kniehl and M. Spira, Nucl. Phys. B [**432**]{}, 39 (1994) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9410319\]; A. Kwiatkowski and M. Steinhauser, Phys. Lett. B [**338**]{}, 66 (1994) \[Erratum-ibid. B [**342**]{}, 455 (1995)\] \[arXiv:hep-ph/9405308\]. K. G. Chetyrkin, B. A. Kniehl and M. Steinhauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**78**]{}, 594 (1997) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9610456\]. A. Ghinculov, Phys. Lett. B [**337**]{}, 137 (1994) \[Erratum-ibid. B [**346**]{}, 426 (1995)\] \[arXiv:hep-ph/9405394\]; L. Durand, K. Riesselmann and B. A. Kniehl, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**72**]{}, 2534 (1994) \[Erratum-ibid. [**74**]{}, 1699 (1995)\]; L. Durand, B. A. Kniehl and K. Riesselmann, Phys. Rev. D [**51**]{}, 5007 (1995) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9412311\]; V. Borodulin and G. Jikia, Phys. Lett. B [**391**]{}, 434 (1997) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9609447\]. B. A. Kniehl, Nucl. Phys. B [**352**]{}, 1 (1991). B. A. Kniehl, Nucl. Phys. B [**357**]{}, 439 (1991). D. Y. Bardin, P. K. Khristova and B. M. Vilensky, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. [**54**]{}, 833 (1991) \[Yad. Fiz. [**54**]{}, 1366 (1991)\]. B. A. Kniehl and M. Spira, Z. Phys. C [**69**]{}, 77 (1995) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9505225\]. B. A. Kniehl and M. Spira, Nucl. Phys. B [**443**]{}, 37 (1995) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9501392\]. B. A. Kniehl and M. Steinhauser, Phys. Lett. B [**365**]{}, 297 (1996) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9507382\]. B. A. Kniehl and M. Steinhauser, Nucl. Phys. B [**454**]{}, 485 (1995) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9508241\]. A. Bredenstein, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier and M. M. Weber, Phys. Rev. D [**74**]{}, 013004 (2006) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0604011\]. A. Bredenstein, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier and M. M. Weber, arXiv:hep-ph/0611234. S. Dittmaier, private communication.
A. Ghinculov, Nucl. Phys. B [**455**]{}, 21 (1995) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9507240\]. A. Frink, B. A. Kniehl, D. Kreimer and K. Riesselmann, Phys. Rev. D [**54**]{}, 4548 (1996) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9606310\].
M. Spira, A. Djouadi, D. Graudenz and P. M. Zerwas, Nucl. Phys. B [**453**]{}, 17 (1995) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9504378\].
K. G. Chetyrkin, B. A. Kniehl and M. Steinhauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**79**]{}, 353 (1997) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9705240\]. P. A. Baikov and K. G. Chetyrkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**97**]{}, 061803 (2006) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0604194\]. A. Djouadi and P. Gambino, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**73**]{}, 2528 (1994) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9406432\]; K. G. Chetyrkin, B. A. Kniehl and M. Steinhauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**78**]{}, 594 (1997) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9610456\]; K. G. Chetyrkin, B. A. Kniehl and M. Steinhauser, Nucl. Phys. B [**490**]{}, 19 (1997) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9701277\].
H. q. Zheng and D. d. Wu, Phys. Rev. D [**42**]{}, 3760 (1990); A. Djouadi, M. Spira, J. J. van der Bij and P. M. Zerwas, Phys. Lett. B [**257**]{}, 187 (1991); S. Dawson and R. P. Kauffman, Phys. Rev. D [**47**]{}, 1264 (1993); A. Djouadi, M. Spira and P. M. Zerwas, Phys. Lett. B [**311**]{}, 255 (1993) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9305335\]; K. Melnikov and O. I. Yakovlev, Phys. Lett. B [**312**]{}, 179 (1993) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9302281\]; M. Inoue, R. Najima, T. Oka and J. Saito, Mod. Phys. Lett. A [**9**]{}, 1189 (1994); J. Fleischer, O. V. Tarasov and V. O. Tarasov, Phys. Lett. B [**584**]{}, 294 (2004) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0401090\]. M. Steinhauser, arXiv:hep-ph/9612395. U. Aglietti, R. Bonciani, G. Degrassi and A. Vicini, Phys. Lett. B [**595**]{}, 432 (2004) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0404071\]; Phys. Lett. B [**600**]{}, 57 (2004) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0407162\]. F. Fugel, B. A. Kniehl and M. Steinhauser, Nucl. Phys. B [**702**]{}, 333 (2004) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0405232\]. Y. Liao and X. y. Li, Phys. Lett. B [**396**]{}, 225 (1997) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9605310\]; A. Djouadi, P. Gambino and B. A. Kniehl, Nucl. Phys. B [**523**]{}, 17 (1998) \[arXiv:hep-ph/9712330\]. G. Degrassi and F. Maltoni, Nucl. Phys. B [**724**]{}, 183 (2005) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0504137\]. M. Spira, A. Djouadi and P. M. Zerwas, Phys. Lett. B [**276**]{}, 350 (1992).
C. W. Bauer, Z. Ligeti, M. Luke, A. V. Manohar and M. Trott, Phys. Rev. D [**70**]{}, 094017 (2004) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0408002\]. D. Benson, I. I. Bigi, T. Mannel and N. Uraltsev, Nucl. Phys. B [**665**]{}, 367 (2003) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0302262\]. G. Corcella and A. H. Hoang, Phys. Lett. B [**554**]{}, 133 (2003) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0212297\]. A. H. Hoang and M. Jamin, Phys. Lett. B [**594**]{}, 127 (2004) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0403083\]. J. H. Kühn and M. Steinhauser, Nucl. Phys. B [**619**]{}, 588 (2001) \[Erratum-ibid. B [**640**]{}, 415 (2002)\] \[arXiv:hep-ph/0109084\]. K. G. Chetyrkin, J. H. Kuhn and C. Sturm, Eur. Phys. J. C [**48**]{}, 107 (2006) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0604234\]. R. Boughezal, M. Czakon and T. Schutzmeier, Phys. Rev. D [**74**]{}, 074006 (2006) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0605023\]. J. Rolf and S. Sint \[ALPHA Collaboration\], JHEP [**0212**]{}, 007 (2002) \[arXiv:hep-ph/0209255\]. G. M. de Divitiis, M. Guagnelli, R. Petronzio, N. Tantalo and F. Palombi, Nucl. Phys. B [**675**]{}, 309 (2003) \[arXiv:hep-lat/0305018\]. A. Gray, I. Allison, C. T. H. Davies, E. Gulez, G. P. Lepage, J. Shigemitsu and M. Wingate, Phys. Rev. D [**72**]{}, 094507 (2005) \[arXiv:hep-lat/0507013\]. M. Nobes and H. Trottier, PoS [**LAT2005**]{}, 209 (2006) \[arXiv:hep-lat/0509128\].
[^1]: We added the charm quark loop to the SM $\Gamma_{gg}$ calculation in [HDECAY]{}, to be consistent with its inclusion in the MSSM calculation.
[^2]: This formula automatically takes into account the change in the number of quark flavours in the running at the $b$ threshold.
[^3]: This number is for [NF-GG = 5]{}, i.e., the gluon splitting to $b \bar b$ or $c \bar c$ at NLO is *not* subtracted off $\Gamma_{gg}$ and added on to $\Gamma_{b\bar b, c\bar c}$; see the end of this subsection for further discussion of this issue.
[^4]: A renormalon is a power-like infrared-sensitive contribution to a hard process – a relative correction of order $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_Q$ in our case – as opposed to the usual logarithmic infrared-sensitive effects $\log(\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_Q)$ encountered in QCD calculations.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'In multi-turn dialogs, natural language understanding models can introduce obvious errors by being blind to contextual information. To incorporate dialog history, we present a neural architecture with *Speaker-Sensitive Dual Memory Networks* which encode utterances differently depending on the speaker. This addresses the different extents of information available to the system - the system knows only the surface form of user utterances while it has the exact semantics of system output. We performed experiments on real user data from Microsoft Cortana, a commercial personal assistant. The result showed a significant performance improvement over the state-of-the-art slot tagging models using contextual information.'
address: |
Amazon Alexa Brain, Seattle, WA^\*^,\
Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA^\*\*^
bibliography:
- 'acl2017.bib'
title: 'Speaker-Sensitive Dual Memory Networks for Multi-Turn Slot Tagging'
---
Introduction {#sec:intro}
============
Major technology companies have been investing in natural language understanding systems as effective tools for human-computer communication [@ybkim2015weakly; @kimgazet2015; @sarikaya2016overview; @ybkim2016reuse; @kimfrustratingly; @kimdomainless; @kim2017domainattention; @kim2017advr]. Of particular interest are task-oriented personal assistants, e.g., Amazon’s Alexa, Apple Siri and Microsoft Cortana. In task-oriented dialogs, the main role of the system is to fill out the associated slots to the semantic frame of the requested task. As the demand for fulfilling more complex tasks with voice-interface agents keeps increasing, it becomes crucial to address some issues faced when handling multi-turn interaction. For example, in Table \[tab:scenarioReservation\], the user’s utterance at turn 3 could mean either *number\_people* or *time* without any context.
Turn Speaker Utterance Targeted Slots
------ --------- ---------------------------------------------------- ------------------
System Where do you want to reserve? *place\_name*
User Pizza Hut -
System For how many people? *number\_people*
User Two -
System Okay. What time should I make the reservation for? {*time, date*}
User Actually it’s three -
Traditionally, the natural language understanding (NLU) module [@tur2011spoken] delegates the task of contextual interpretation to downstream modules such as dialog state tracker [@williams2016dialog]. However, given that most dialog state trackers just exploit the slot-values recognized by the NLU module as is without further transformation based on context, the NLU errors due to the context-insensitivity are very likely to propagate through downstream modules. Thus it is critical to reduce the context-related NLU errors as early in the system pipeline as possible.
With this aim, a host of previous studies has attempted to incorporate dialog history for contextual interpretation [@bhargava2013easy; @xu2014contextual; @shi2015contextual]. A large body of work, however, exploited only previous turn information such as the NLU results at the previous turn. Not only are they limited in the range of history information but also they internally suffer the error propagation problems by directly using previous predictions. With the rise of end-to-end deep neural network models, Chen et al. [@chen2016end] addressed such shortcomings with end-to-end memory networks [@sukhbaatar2015end] where the embeddings of all past user utterances are stored in a memory. In their work, however, no system’s information was used which will prove powerful in our experimental results.
In this paper we propose an end-to-end neural architecture for slot tagging that uses *Speaker-Sensitive Dual Memory Networks* (SSDMNs) to leverage both user and system information in a tailored manner. Specifically, since the system only gets to see the surface form of user’s utterance, we encode each word of all past user’s utterances using the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model [@hochreiter1997long]. We store the encoded vectors of each word in a memory and use an attention mechanism [@bahdanau2014neural] to selectively use only relevant words to the current user input. Whereas the system already knows the exact semantics of its past utterances, thus we directly encode the targeted slots of system’s question to avoid parsing noisy natural language expressions. Due to this different nature, we introduce a separate memory storing all system’s targeted slot embeddings. The attention mechanism again allows to selectively use relevant system information. Hori et al. [@hori2016context] adopted a similar concept, role-dependent encoding, but their work is not aimed for slot tagging, nor does it exploit the system output semantics. Furthermore, we adopt an efficient pre-training method [@kim2015new; @kimpre2015; @kim2016scalable; @kim2017preframe] for system’s targeted slot encoding that further improves the system’s performance. To verify the efficacy of the proposed model, we performed evaluation on a large amount of real data gathered from five different domains of commercial personal assistants. In comparison to previous approaches our method showed a large improvement.
The rest of the paper is structured as follows. In Section \[sec:method\] we describe SSDMNs in depth. In Section \[sec:experiments\] we discuss our experiments. We finish with conclusions in Section \[sec:conclusion\].
Speaker-Sensitive Dual Memory Networks {#sec:method}
======================================
At turn $t$, the multi-turn slot tagging model takes a user input ${\bm u}^t$ and outputs semantic tags ${\bm m}^t$ by considering the contextual information, i.e., a sequence of user’s past utterances $\{{\bm u}^1, \ldots, {\bm u}^{t-1}\}$ and the corresponding system outputs $\{{\bm m}^1, \ldots, {\bm m}^{t-1}\}$.
Overall architecture
--------------------
{width="\textwidth"}
The overall SSDMNs architecture is illustrated in Figure \[fig:overall\]. The model first encodes the last user input and system output to produce vector embeddings. Then it updates the dual memories with the generated vectors. After that, as it encodes the current user utterance, at each word position, it computes the attention weights to find relevant information. Finally it makes prediction for each word by jointly considering the encoded vector of each word and the memory content averaged with respect to the attention weights. The main steps are described below.
User utterance encoding
-----------------------
In order to obtain a more contextful vector representation of the $j$-th word $u^i_j$ of the user utterance at turn $i$, we adopt a stateful LSTM instead of a vanilla LSTM encoder - the LSTM output for the last word in an utterance is fed as the initial state into the LSTM network for the next utterance while all LSTM weights are shared. The stateful LSTM runs over both past user utterances and the current input: $$\tilde{\bm u}^i = \text{StatefulLSTM}({\bm u}^i), i < t$$ $${\bm h}^t = \text{StatefulLSTM}({\bm u}^t)$$
System output encoding
----------------------
Since the system has the exact semantics of system utterances, we directly encode the targeted slots that usually have strong influence on the following user’s response. Concretely, for each system output, we are given an k-hot vector ${\bf m}^i \in \mathbb{R}^l$, where $l$ is the number of slot tags, which indicates which slot is targeted by the system’s output. Then we use a trainable projection matrix ${\bf P} \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times l}$ to map the k-hot vector to a $d$-dimensional dense vector $\tilde{\bf m}^i$: $$\tilde{\bf m}^i = {\bf P}{\bf m}^i$$ Note that since ${\bf m}^i$ is a k-hot vector, $\tilde{\bf m}^i$ is the sum of the targeted slot embeddings. It has been observed that pre-trained embeddings can serve as good initialization values that help avoid converging to bad local optima and speed up model training. Inspired by [@kim2015new], we adopt *Canonical Correlation Analysis* (CCA) to efficiently pre-train the projection matrix. The CCA algorithm finds a lower dimensional projection that maximizes the correlation between a set of random vector pairs:
- {${\bf a}^i$} is a set of zero vectors in which the entry corresponding to the slot tag of the i-th sentence is set to 1.
- {${\bf b}^i$} is a set of zero vectors in which the entries corresponding to words spanned by the tag are set to 1.
Memory update
-------------
Although an LSTM network can capture long-term dependencies, it has been argued that LSTM networks’ fixed-size memory may not be enough to contain a large amount of information encoded in variable-sized inputs [@bahdanau2014neural]. Thus before performing the tag prediction we update the dual memories with the encoded vectors of each word of the user utterances ($\tilde{\bf u}^i_k$) and system output vectors ($\tilde{\bf m}^i$) encoded in the manner described above, respectively.
Attention mechanism
-------------------
Since not every piece of history information is helpful in making prediction for a current word, we selectively use only relevant information. To this end, we first compute the attention weights for both memories: $${\bf \alpha}^i_j = \mathrm{softmax} ({\bf W}_\alpha(\tilde{\bf u}^i_j \circ {\bf h}^t_k) + b_\alpha)$$ $${\bf \beta}^i = \mathrm{softmax} ({\bf W}_\beta(\tilde{\bf m}^i \circ {\bf h}^t_k) + b_\beta)$$ where ${\bf h}^t_k$ is the LSTM output for ${\bf u}^t_k$, ${\bf W}_\alpha$ and ${\bf W}_\beta$ are weight matrices, $b_\alpha$ and $b_\beta$ are bias vectors, $\circ$ denotes element-wise vector multiplication, and $\mathrm{softmax}(x^i_j) = e^{x^i_j}\text{/}\sum_{k,l} e^{x^k_l}$. Then we compute the weighted sum of memory entries: $$\bar{\bf u} = \sum_{i,j} \alpha^i_j \tilde{\bf u}^i_j$$ $$\bar{\bf m} = \sum_i \beta^i \tilde{\bf m}^i$$
Tag prediction
--------------
Finally we use $\bar{\bf u}$ and $\bar{\bf m}$ along with ${\bf h}^t_k$ to make the tag prediction: $$\hat{\bf y}^t_{k,l} = \frac{\exp{{\bf z}^t_{k,l}}}{\sum_{l'} \exp{{\bf z}^t_{k,l'}}}$$ where ${\bf z}^t_k = {\bf W}_h {\bf h}_k^t + {\bf W}_u \bar{\bf u} + {\bf W}_m \bar{\bf m}$ and ${\bf W}_*$ are all trainable weight matrices.
Experiments {#sec:experiments}
===========
Domain Train Dev Test
------------- ------- ------- -------
Orderfood 5,993 1,333 1,714
Reservation 5,130 1,215 1,339
Taxi 6,120 1,216 1,414
Events 4,347 822 850
Movieticket 3,781 712 738
Average 5,074 1,059 1,211
: Data description[]{data-label="tab:data"}
Domain LSTM +LS +PreLS MNs MNs+S SSDMNs
------------- ------- ------- -------- ------- ------- -----------
Orderfood 87.38 93.70 94.10 92.07 94.36 **96.45**
Reservation 86.29 91.96 92.81 90.80 91.64 **94.37**
Taxi 89.46 93.77 94.58 92.57 93.11 **96.67**
Events 85.17 91.39 90.80 87.61 89.64 **92.21**
Movieticket 88.06 93.76 94.53 90.96 91.89 **96.14**
Average 87.27 92.92 93.36 90.80 92.13 **95.17**
Models
------
To evaluate the SSDMNs model, we conducted comparative experiments with the following systems:
- **LSTM** uses the stateful LSTM only with no contextual information used.
- **+LS** additionally uses the last system output.
- **+PreLS** uses the pre-trained system tag projection matrix for encoding the last system output to show the efficacy of the CCA pre-training scheme.
- **MNs** similarly to the Memory Networks model in Chen et al. [@chen2016end], the system does not use system’s output information.
- **MNs+S** MNs with system’s output in surface form.
Data
----
The data is collected from five domains of Microsoft Cortana. Table \[tab:data\] shows the number of utterances of the training, development and test datasets of each domain. All datasets were labeled by expert editors.
Training setting {#subsec:setting}
----------------
In our experiments, all the models were implemented using Dynet [@neubig2017dynet] and were trained using Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) with Adam [@kingma2014adam]—an adaptive learning rate algorithm. We used the initial learning rate of $4 \times 10^{-4}$ and left all the other hyper parameters as suggested in [@kingma2014adam]. Each SGD update was computed with Intel MKL (Math Kernel Library) [^1] without minibatching. We used the dropout regularization [@srivastava2014dropout] with the keep probability of 0.4. Both dimensions of the input and output of the stateful LSTM model were 100. To initialize word embedding, we used the pre-trained GloVe model [@pennington2014glove]. For system slot tag embedding, we used CCA to induce 100 dimensional vector representation from 20 personal assistant domains consisting of 3M utterances and 130 distinct tags.
Results {#subsec:results}
-------
To compute slot F1-score, we used the standard CoNLL evaluation script[^2]. In Table \[tab:nhot\], the stateful LSTM-only model (LSTM) achieved 87.27% in averaged F1 score. The improved performance of the +LS model, 92.92%, confirms the same findings of previous studies on the effectiveness of previous turn information for contextual interpretation. The further performance increase of the +PreLS model, achieving 93.36%, demonstrates the possible gain with the proposed pre-training scheme. Interestingly the MNs model couldn’t show a better performance than the +LS model, even after incorporating system’s output in surface form, justifying our novel contribution on the dual encoding of system output. This claim is also supported by the best performance of the SSDMNs model reaching 95.17%.
Conclusion {#sec:conclusion}
==========
We presented a novel *Speaker-Sensitive Dual Memory Networks* model for the multi-turn slot tagging task which extends the state-of-the-art Memory Networks-based approach with tailored memories to exploit the exact semantic knowledge on system output. We also described an efficient pre-training scheme to obtain better slot tag embeddings. The large performance improvement on real data demonstrates the efficacy of SSDMNs. Future work includes a detailed analysis on various reasoning behaviors of the model depending on different contexts. Also we plan to incorporate more elements of dialog state beyond system output. Another interesting direction is to perform multiple memory references to handle more complex discourse phenomena such as ellipsis, anaphora resolution.
[^1]: https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intelr-mkl-and-c-template-libraries
[^2]: http://www.cnts.ua.ac.be/conll2000/chunking/output.html
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'Biased electrodes are common components of plasma sources and diagnostics. The plasma-electrode interaction is mediated by an intervening sheath structure that influences properties of the electrons and ions contacting the electrode surface, as well as how the electrode influences properties of the bulk plasma. A rich variety of sheath structures have been observed, including ion sheaths, electron sheaths, double sheaths, double layers, anode glow, and fireballs. These represent complex self-organized responses of the plasma that depend not only on the local influence of the electrode, but also on the global properties of the plasma and the other boundaries that it is in contact with. This review summarizes recent advances in understanding the conditions under which each type of sheath forms, what the basic stability criteria and steady-state properties of each are, and the ways in which each can influence plasma-boundary interactions and bulk plasma properties. These results may be of interest to a number of application areas where biased electrodes are used, including diagnostics, plasma modification of materials, plasma sources, electric propulsion, and the interaction of plasmas with objects in space.'
address:
- 'Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA'
- 'Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185, USA'
author:
- 'Scott D. Baalrud, Brett Scheiner'
- 'Benjamin Yee, Matthew M. Hopkins and Edward Barnat'
title: 'Interaction of Biased Electrodes and Plasmas: Sheaths, Double Layers and Fireballs'
---
[*Keywords*]{}: Sheath, double layer, fireball, anode spot, electrostatic instability\
Introduction\[sec:intro\]
=========================
Sheaths are fascinating examples of plasma self-organization. They are thin regions of strong electric field separating a quasineutral plasma from a material boundary that naturally form due to the surface charge generated as ions and electrons diffuse from the plasma at different rates [@lang:23; @lang:29; @riem:91; @fran:03a; @lieb:05; @robe:13]. Sheaths act to balance the electron and ion losses at steady-state [@hers:05]. An accurate description of sheaths is essential for many plasma-based applications and experiments. For example, sheaths provide the directed energy necessary to etch semiconductors or alter surface properties of materials [@cobu:79; @wu:10]. They influence the particle and energy exhaust, wall erosion, and recycling in fusion energy experiments [@stan:84]. Interpretation of diagnostics such as Langmuir probes rely on an accurate description of their properties [@lieb:05; @merl:07]. Sheaths are a critical feature of the interaction between objects (such as the moon) and space plasmas (such as the solar wind) [@hale:11], as well as spacecraft charging [@garr:81] and interpretation of their onboard diagnostics [@jaco:10]. Understanding sheaths is important.
Sheaths have been studied since the beginning of plasma physics research [@lang:23; @lang:29]. Most studies have focused on ion sheaths, which are thin (several Debye length long) ion-rich regions where the electric field points from the plasma to the boundary with monotonically increasing magnitude [@riem:91]. Ion sheaths are the most common type of sheath because electrons are typically much more mobile than ions in a plasma. This leads to a balance between negative charge on boundary surfaces and positive sheath charge in the plasma. The sheath acts to reduce the electron flux so that it balances the ion flux reaching the boundary. The basic properties of ion sheaths are well understood. However, a rich variety of different types of sheaths can be generated near biased electrodes [@hers:05]. Not all of these are well understood. This review summarizes recent progress in understanding sheaths and related space-charge structures near biased electrodes in low-temperature, low-pressure plasmas; plasmas with electron temperature of a few eV, ion temperatures near room temperature, and pressures of approximately $10^{-2}-10^2$ mTorr. These include ion sheaths, electron sheaths, double sheaths, double layers, anode glow, and fireballs. Whereas the typical description of ion sheaths is based on a local analysis of a boundary interacting with an infinite plasma, the type of sheath that forms near a biased electrode often depends on global properties of the plasma and confinement chamber. Descriptions of these structures thus depend on the non-local physics of global plasma self-organization. This review discusses experimental conditions where each type of sheath may be expected to form, the basic properties of each type of sheath, ways in which the sheath influences bulk plasma properties, and how the different types of sheaths have been used to create advantageous outcomes in a variety of applications.
Section \[sec:structures\] uses an example experimental configuration to illustrate how global conditions influence the type of sheath structure that will form near a biased electrode. The example geometry consists of a single electrode of surface area $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}$ biased at a potential $\phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}$ with respect to a grounded chamber wall of area $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}$. Conditions of global current balance in steady-state are shown to distinguish between the variety of possible sheath types, which can be categorized as ion sheaths, electron sheaths, double sheaths, anode glow (a type of double layer), or fireballs. Applications associated with this configuration are discussed. The remainder of the review focuses on recent advances in fundamental physics and applications associated with each of these sheath types.
Section \[sec:is\] discusses ion sheaths. Although the basics of ion sheaths are generally well understood, a few recent advances are highlighted. These focus on features particular to biased electrodes, such as kinetic effects that arise as the electrode bias approaches the plasma potential [@baal:11c; @sche:16]. It also includes a review of recent theory, simulations, and experiments that have established the importance of ion-flow-driven instabilities in the presheath [@baal:16]. These include ion-acoustic instabilities in plasmas with one ion species, and ion-ion two-stream instabilities in plasmas with multiple ion species. These instabilities have been observed to influence plasma properties, such as the ion velocity distribution function, velocity and density profiles, near the sheath in low-temperature low-pressure plasmas.
Section \[sec:es\] discusses electron sheaths. Electron sheaths are thin regions of negative space charge in which the electric field points from the electrode to the plasma, and which monotonically increases in magnitude from the plasma toward the electrode. These are observed near small electrodes biased positive with respect to the plasma. A number of interesting features of electron sheaths have been discovered recently. These include the presence of an electron presheath [@yee:17], which is a long region with an electron pressure gradient that acts to accelerate electrons toward the boundary. Electrons are observed to gain a drift approaching the electron thermal speed as they near the electron sheath [@sche:15]. The differential streaming between electrons and ions excites electron-ion two-stream instabilities near the ion plasma frequency [@sche:15]. In addition, high frequency instabilities near the electron plasma frequency have been observed [@sten:88]. The use of electron sheaths in applications such as electron source design and in the control of the electron energy distribution function (EEDF) are also discussed.
Section \[sec:ds\] discusses double sheaths. Double sheaths (also known as virtual cathodes) are regions of alternating positive and negative space charge near the electrode [@hers:94]. These can form due to current balance considerations associated with the global confinement geometry [@baal:07], due to local geometric effects of other surfaces near the biased electrode [@hood:16], or due to electron emission from the electrode [@intr:88; @hers:87; @hers:95]. Recent advances have deepened our understanding of the multitude of different mechanisms responsible for double sheath formation, as well as the role of ion pumping mechanisms required to remove ions from the potential well that forms in a steady-state double sheath [@fore:86]. These include ion-acoustic instabilities that cause the potential well to oscillate, as well as steady-state potential structures that can form to allow ions to leak out of the well to surrounding surfaces.
Section \[sec:fb\] discusses fireballs [@sten:08]. Fireballs are a secondary discharge near the electrode that is separated from the bulk plasma by a double layer. They form from a thin region of positive space charge that develops within an electron sheath due to a localized increase in the ionization rate generated by sheath-accelerated electrons. When the positive space charge builds to a sufficiently high level, a secondary quasineutral discharge rapidly forms near the electrode [@baal:09]. Recent advances include a more detailed understanding of fireball onset, steady-state properties, stability, and hysteresis that is observed in the electrode bias required for onset and disappearance of the fireball. This understanding has recently been advanced by new laser collision-induced fluorescence (LCIF) diagnostics and the first 2D particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations of fireball formation [@sche:17]. Fireballs have been proposed as a means to control flows in plasmas [@sten:11e], as well as to generate thrust for plasma-based propulsion systems [@makr:14].
Section \[sec:con\] concludes the review with a brief discussion of connections with related topics and open questions. These include measurements that are not yet understood, as well as how these phenomena may behave in related systems such as high pressure plasmas, magnetized plasmas, rf capacitively coupled plasmas, and electronegative plasmas. Answers to these questions will lead to a deeper understanding of these phenomena and are likely to enable new applications.
Observed Sheath Structures\[sec:structures\]
============================================
Geometric Considerations\[sec:gc\]
----------------------------------
Figure \[fg:type\] illustrates the potential profile associated with a variety of sheath structures that have been observed near electrodes biased positive with respect to the confinement chamber walls. To understand when each might form, consider the simple geometry of a planar conducting electrode placed in a plasma confined by a conducting chamber wall, as depicted in figure \[fg:electrode\]. The chamber wall potential will be considered the reference potential (ground) $\phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}=0$. Even if the electrode is biased much more positive than the chamber wall, it may or may not be positive with respect to the plasma potential. The plasma is assumed to be quasineutral with a uniform density and potential except in the sheaths. At steady-state, the plasma potential is determined by balancing the total current of electrons and ions lost from the plasma. As such, the resulting sheath structure depends on the effective area of the electrode for collecting plasma, $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}$, as well as the area of the chamber wall, $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}$ [@baal:07]. Here, $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}$ and $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}$ denote effective areas, which may differ from the geometrical surface areas. For instance, sheath expansion increases $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}$ compared to the geometrical area [@sher:00], while obstructions, such as confining cusp magnetic fields, decrease $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}$ [@hers:92; @hubb:14; @arth:18] in comparison to the geometric wall area. Despite their importance, such factors are particular to specific experimental arrangements. For simplicity, the following discussion focuses on the hypothetical geometry of figure \[fg:electrode\] where the effective areas can either be equated with geometric areas, or there is sufficient information available to determine $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}$ and $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}$ from the geometric areas.
The electrode must be sufficiently small to be biased above the plasma potential. Otherwise, it would collect more electron current than the ion current lost to $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}$. Consider current balance. The electron current lost to the chamber wall is $I_{e,{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}} = e \Gamma_{e,{\textrm{\scriptsize th}}} \exp(-e\phi_p/T_e) A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}$, where $\Gamma_{e,{\textrm{\scriptsize th}}} = \frac{1}{4} \bar{v}_e n_o$ is the random electron flux incident on the ion sheath, $\bar{v}_e = \sqrt{8k_{\textrm{\scriptsize B}}T_e/\pi m_e}$ is the mean electron speed, and $\exp(-e\phi_p/T_e)$ is the Boltzmann factor associated with the electron density drop from the plasma potential $\phi_p$ to the grounded wall. Assume that the sheath near the electrode is an electron sheath that monotonically decreases from the electrode to the plasma potential. In this case, the electron current lost to the electrode is conventionally thought to be the random thermal flux incident on the electrode $e \Gamma_{e,{\textrm{\scriptsize th}}} A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}$, representing a half-Maxwellian electron velocity distribution function at the electron sheath edge. However, recent work has shown the existence of an electron presheath, which establishes a flow shift of the electron distribution function by the sheath edge that satisfies an electron sheath analog of the Bohm criterion: $V_e = \sqrt{T_e/m_e} \equiv v_{e,{\textrm{\scriptsize B}}}$ [@yee:17; @sche:15]. Further 2D-3V PIC simulations revealed that both a combination of flow-shift and loss cone distribution contribute to the electron flux [@sche:16]. To account for these, we take $I_{e,{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}} = \alpha_e e \Gamma_{e,{\textrm{\scriptsize th}}} A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}$, where $\alpha_e =1$ represents the random flux limit and $\alpha_e = \sqrt{2\pi} \exp(-1/2) \approx 1.5$ represents the electron Bohm flux limit.
![Sketch of the electrostatic potential profile of various types of sheaths that can form near a biased electrode: (a) ion sheath, (b) electron sheath, (c) double sheath, (d) anode glow and (e) fireball. Plus signs denote regions of positive space charge and minus signs denote regions of negative space charge. []{data-label="fg:type"}](figure1.pdf){width="6.5cm"}
As long as the electrode is biased at least a few $T_i/e$ above the plasma potential, $e(\phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}- \phi_p) \gtrsim T_e \gg T_i$, ions will be lost only to the chamber wall. The total ion current lost is then $I_i = \Gamma_{i,{\textrm{\scriptsize B}}} A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}$, where $\Gamma_{i,{\textrm{\scriptsize B}}} = \exp(-1/2) e c_s n_o \approx 0.6 e c_s n_o$. Here the factor of $\exp(-1/2) \approx 0.6$ is due to the ion density drop in the ion presheath [@hers:05]. Balancing the electron and ion losses determines the plasma potential $$\label{eq:Vp_es}
\phi_p = - \frac{T_e}{e} \ln \biggl(\mu - \alpha_e \frac{A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}}{A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}} \biggr) ,$$ where $\mu \equiv \sqrt{2.3m_e/m_i}$. The limit of small electrode area returns the floating potential limit $\phi_p = -(T_e/e) \ln (\mu)$. As the area of the electrode increases, the plasma potential gradually increases until the limit $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}\approx \mu A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}/\alpha_e$ is approached, where the plasma potential diverges up to the electrode potential, no matter how high; see figure \[fg:area\]. Thus, the area ratio criterion $$\label{eq:A_es}
\frac{A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}}{A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}} < \frac{\mu}{\alpha_e}$$ must be satisfied for an electron sheath to be present.
In the opposite limit of a large electrode, current balance demands that the plasma potential be higher than the electrode potential, i.e., that an ion sheath forms at the electrode. If the electrode sheath is an ion sheath, ions are lost to both the electrode and wall with a total current of $I_i = \Gamma_{i,{\textrm{\scriptsize B}}} (A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}+ A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}})$. Electrons are also lost to each boundary, with total current $I_e = e \Gamma_{e,{\textrm{\scriptsize th}}} \lbrace A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}\exp(-e\phi_p/T_e) + A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}\exp[-e(\phi_p-\phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}})/T_e]\rbrace$. Equating these, the plasma potential in the case of an ion sheath is $$\label{eq:Vp_is}
\phi_p = \phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}-\frac{T_e}{e} \ln \biggl[ \frac{\mu (1 + A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}/A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}})}{A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}/A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}+ \exp(-e\phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}/T_e)} \biggr] .
$$ Conventionally, an ion sheath is expected to satisfy Bohm’s criterion where ions are accelerated in a presheath with a potential drop of at least $T_e/(2e)$ (this is the argument that leads to the $\exp(-1/2) \approx 0.6$ factor for the density drop in the presheath). Thus, a minimum area ratio criterion for an ion sheath near the biased electrode is obtained by taking $e(\phi_p-\phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}) = T_e/2$ and $\phi_p \gg T_e$, leading to $$\label{eq:A_is}
\frac{A_{{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}}}{A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}} \geq \biggl( \frac{0.6}{\mu} -1 \biggr)^{-1} \approx 1.7 \mu .$$
![Illustration of a hypothetical experimental setup with a biased electrode of area $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}$ in a confinement chamber of area $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}$. The gray area denotes an insulator, such that the only the conducting face of the electrode is exposed to the plasma. []{data-label="fg:electrode"}](figure2.pdf){width="6.5cm"}
Figure \[fg:area\] shows the plasma potential obtained from equations (\[eq:Vp\_es\]) and (\[eq:Vp\_is\]) within the range of values at which the expressions are expected to be valid, equations (\[eq:A\_es\]) and (\[eq:A\_is\]) respectively. This illustrates that there is a gap between the area ratio at which an electron sheath or ion sheath is predicted. Multiple proposals have been made for how the sheath transitions from one solution to the other through this region. Some experiments have measured a double sheath of the form shown in figure \[fg:type\]c at conditions where the area ratio was predicted to be in, or near, this transition region; see figure 2 of [@baal:07]. Earlier work has also documented similar double sheath structures in experiments at similar conditions [@fore:86]. In this scenario, the virtual cathode (i.e., potential dip) regulates the electron current reaching the electrode to achieve global current balance, such that $\alpha_e \rightarrow \exp(-e\Delta \phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize D}}/T_e)$ in equation (\[eq:Vp\_es\]), where $\Delta \phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize D}}= \phi_p-\phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize D}}$ is the potential drop from the plasma to the dip minimum [@hers:05].
![Plasma potential predicted from equation (\[eq:Vp\_connect\]) as a function of (a) area ratio for an electrode biased at $e\phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}/T_e=15$ and (b) electrode potential at a variety of area ratio $(A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}/A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}})$ values indicated by the numbers. The mass ratio is taken to be that of an argon plasma $m_i/m_e = 7.3\times 10^4$. Curves in the electron sheath region correspond to the solution of equation (\[eq:Vp\_es\]) for $\alpha_e = 1.5$ (solid) and $\alpha_e = 1$ (dashed). The solution in the ion sheath region corresponds to equation (\[eq:Vp\_is\]). []{data-label="fg:area"}](figure3a.pdf "fig:"){width="7cm"}\
![Plasma potential predicted from equation (\[eq:Vp\_connect\]) as a function of (a) area ratio for an electrode biased at $e\phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}/T_e=15$ and (b) electrode potential at a variety of area ratio $(A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}/A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}})$ values indicated by the numbers. The mass ratio is taken to be that of an argon plasma $m_i/m_e = 7.3\times 10^4$. Curves in the electron sheath region correspond to the solution of equation (\[eq:Vp\_es\]) for $\alpha_e = 1.5$ (solid) and $\alpha_e = 1$ (dashed). The solution in the ion sheath region corresponds to equation (\[eq:Vp\_is\]). []{data-label="fg:area"}](figure3b.pdf "fig:"){width="7cm"}
A recognized challenge with a steady-state double sheath is that there must be some mechanism to pump ions that get trapped in the potential well (for instance, due to a collision with a neutral atom) [@hers:87]. Otherwise, the positive space charge would build and flatten the potential well. Two possible explanations have emerged. One is that ions can be pumped to grounded or dielectric boundaries nearby the electrode (such as dielectric coatings on the back or sides of the electrodes) [@fore:86]. This requires a two-dimensional description of the sheath potential where ions can “slide” out the sides of the one-dimensional potential well [@hood:16]. Another is that the potential well oscillates at a timescale characteristic of the ion plasma frequency, which allows time-dependent pumping of otherwise trapped ions, and the double sheath potential profile emerges in the long-time average. Each of these possibilities has backing from experiments or simulations, and will be discussed in more detail in section \[sec:ds\].
Recent work has also shown that the transition from ion to electron sheath can be achieved without the formation of a local potential minimum (i.e., with monotonically increasing or decreasing potential profiles, that become nearly flat when $\phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}\approx \phi_p$) [@sche:16; @hopk:16]. These do not satisfy the conventional Bohm criterion or require the existence of a presheath. Such kinetic presheaths and Bohm criteria that emerge in this scenario have been discussed recently [@baal:11c], and will be reviewed in section \[sec:transition\].
In this situation, the electron and ion fluxes to the electrode transition to the random thermal flux, rather than the Bohm flux, in the transition region. A model for the plasma potential can be obtained by generalizing equations (\[eq:Vp\_es\]) and (\[eq:Vp\_is\]) to account for this. Since $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}\ll A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}$ in the transition region, we focus on this regime. In this case, the ion current lost to the electrode is negligible compared to the ion current lost to the chamber wall, regardless of the plasma potential. Accounting for this, the term $(1+A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}/A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}) \approx 1$ in equation (\[eq:Vp\_is\]), and the ion sheath solution can be extended to its intersection with the electron sheath solution. This leads to the expression $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:Vp_connect}
\phi_p =
\left\lbrace \begin{array}{ll}
-\frac{T_e}{e} \ln \biggl(\mu - \alpha_e \frac{A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}}{A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}} \biggr) , \ \textrm{if} \ \frac{A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}}{A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}} \leq \frac{\mu}{\alpha_e} - e^{-e\phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}/T_e} \\
\phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}- \frac{T_e}{e} \ln \biggl[ \frac{\mu}{A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}/A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}+ \exp(-e\phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}/T_e)} \biggr] , \ \textrm{otherwise}
\end{array} \right.\end{aligned}$$ for the plasma potential that includes the ion and electron sheath limits and spans the transition region.
This elementary analysis based on current balance demonstrates that a biased electrode significantly influences the plasma on a global scale when $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}/A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}\gtrsim \sqrt{m_e/m_i} \ll 1$. The use of Langmuir probes in plasmas is predicated on the assumption that the diagnostic itself causes a negligible perturbation to the plasma [@hers:89]. The current balance condition implies that the smallness of a Langmuir probe depends on the size of the probe itself, the size of the plasma chamber in which it is confined, as well as the mass ratio of ions and electrons in the plasma. A Langmuir probe must be very small to not perturb a plasma and one must think globally, not just locally, to understand the influence that the probe has on the plasma. Furthermore, we emphasize that the area $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}$ is the “effective” area for electron collection at the electrode. Sheaths cause the effective area of an electrode be larger than the geometric area [@sher:00; @lee:07b]. In fact, for a sufficiently small geometric probe size, such as a wire electrode, the effective size of the probe can be dominantly determined by the Debye length of the plasma. In this limit, the ratio of the Debye length to the plasma chamber size becomes the relevant scale comparison to assess the global influence of a probe.
Finally, we note that this analysis has assumed that electrons or ions are absorbed by the boundary if they reach it. In fact, it is possible for a particle to reflect from the boundary back into the plasma. The probability of absorption of the charge, called the sticking coefficient, is a highly material dependent property [@bron:15]. However, it can have a significant influence on the current balance and corresponding sheath structure.
Tests of the geometric transitions
----------------------------------
Experiments and simulations have been performed to explicitly test the predicted area ratio criteria from equations (\[eq:A\_es\]) and (\[eq:A\_is\]) [@baal:07; @hopk:16; @barn:14]. One factor complicating such tests is that the effective areas for electron or ion collection are often expected to differ substantially from the geometric areas, and this can be difficult to quantify. For example, some experiments are conducted in multidipole confinement chambers where the effective loss area depends on the loss width of the magnetic cusps [@limp:73; @coop:16]. Another complicating factor is that the experiments often have more elaborate geometries than that described in figure \[fg:electrode\], as well as electron sources used to generate the plasma that influence the current balance. Each of these effects must be accounted for in the current balance. Despite these complications, progress has been made.
![Emissive probe measurements of the plasma potential in front of an electrode biased at +40 V with respect to a grounded chamber wall. The area of the conducting surface of each electrode was predicted by current balance to fall in the regime of an electron sheath (red circles), transition region, leading to the observed double sheath (green triangles), or ion sheath (black squares). Figure reprinted from reference [@baal:07]. []{data-label="fg:NAF_sheath"}](figure4.pdf){width="6.5cm"}
The first experimental tests were made in a multidipole confinement device with an electrode configuration similar to that depicted in figure \[fg:electrode\] [@baal:07]. The electrodes were circular disks with the front side conducting and the back side covered with a dielectric coating. Electrodes with different exposed surface areas were tested. Figure \[fg:NAF\_sheath\] shows plasma potential profile measurements, made with an emissive probe, in front of three electrodes of different surface areas. The surface areas were chosen to correspond to the predicted regimes of electron sheath, ion sheath, and near the transition region; though predicting a precise area ratio was difficult in this device because the effective wall area $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}$ was influenced by the local cusp magnetic field. Nevertheless, the figure shows an electron sheath in front of the small electrode, an ion sheath in front of the large electrode, and a double sheath in front of an electrode of intermediate size.
More detailed experimental tests were made using a segmented electrode to more sensitively vary the effective area of the electrode [@barn:14]; see figure \[fg:seg\_photo\]. The geometrical area of the electrode for collecting electrons was varied by positively biasing a subset of the segments, while electrically connecting the rest to the grounded chamber wall. An ion sheath was observed near the positive electrode when sufficiently many segments were biased positively, and an electron sheath was observed when sufficiently few were biased positively. The transition between the two regimes was found to be consistent with the predictions from current balance indicated by equations (\[eq:A\_es\]) and (\[eq:A\_is\]) (with a minor modification to account for the electron current source in that experiment). Likewise, the relationship between the plasma potential and area ratio was consistent with that predicted from current balance. The measured sheath potential profile was observed to smoothly transition from an electron sheath to an ion sheath as the effective electrode size was increased in this experiment. The presence or absence of a double sheath is discussed further in section \[sec:ds\].
![Photograph of a segmented electrode used to test the area ratio criterion for electron versus ion sheath formation. Figure reprinted from reference [@barn:14].[]{data-label="fg:seg_photo"}](figure5.jpg){width="6.5cm"}
Further tests were performed with 2D PIC simulations in reference [@hopk:16]. These used a rectangular 2D domain with a small portion of the boundary biased positive with respect to the rest of the boundary. The two boundaries were separated by a thin dielectric layer, which was included to remove strong electric fields associated with a sharp contact point; see figure 4 of [@hopk:16]. Since the electrode and wall areas (lengths in a 2D geometry) were set by the chosen computational domain, these simulations provided strict tests of the area ratio criteria. By changing the length of the biased segment of the boundary, the electron-to-ion sheath transition was explored. They were found to be in very close agreement with the predictions of equations (\[eq:A\_es\]) and (\[eq:A\_is\]). However, unlike the experiment from reference [@baal:07] that measured a double sheath in the transition region, a smooth transition from electron to ion sheath was observed as the electrode area increased. Similar smooth transitions from electron sheath to ion sheath were observed in combination with a loss-cone-like distribution for electrons in reference [@sche:16].
Global non-ambipolar flow
-------------------------
The current balance arguments suggest that sufficiently large electrodes can be used to control the plasma potential and, in turn, the boundaries that electrons and ions are lost to. If the plasma potential is much larger than the electron temperature ($e\phi_p \gg T_e$), essentially all electrons will be blocked from reaching the chamber wall, and consequently will only be lost to the electrode. If the electrode is sized to be in (or near) the transition region, such that it can be biased more positive than the plasma potential by an amount that is much larger than the ion temperature \[$e (\phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}- \phi_p) \gg T_i$\], then essentially all ions will be blocked from reaching the electrode, and will consequently only be lost to the chamber wall. In reference [@baal:07] this situation was dubbed “global non-ambipolar flow”.
![Dependence of plasma potential ($\phi_p=V_p$) on the electrode potential ($\phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}= V_{\textrm{\scriptsize AE}}$) for electrode areas ($A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}= A_{\textrm{\scriptsize AE}}$) predicted to be in each of the three sheath regimes: electron sheath (red circles), transition region leading to a double sheath (green triangles), and ion sheath (black squares). Measurements of the associated sheath potential profiles are shown in figure \[fg:NAF\_sheath\]. The line indicates $\phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}= \phi_p$. This figure is reprinted with permission from reference [@baal:07].[]{data-label="fg:Vp_NAF"}](figure6.pdf){width="6.5cm"}
Figure \[fg:Vp\_NAF\] shows measurements of the bulk plasma potential as electrode bias is varied. Electrodes with three surface areas were chosen to correspond to the three sheath regimes shown in figure \[fg:NAF\_sheath\], providing experimental measurements of the predicted plasma potential control shown in figure \[fg:area\]b. The plasma potential is always slightly above that of a large electrode (ion sheath), varies little in response to a small electrode (electron sheath), and is proportional to (but slightly less than) that of an intermediate sized electrode (double sheath). By choosing an electrode area near the transition region, the plasma potential could then be raised far above the grounded chamber wall. Measurements of the current with electrodes in this regime confirmed global non-ambipolar flow [@baal:07].
Global non-ambipolar flow provides an efficient way to extract the maximum electron current from a plasma. This was utilized in the design of the *Non-Ambipolar Electron Source* [@long:06; @long:07; @long:08]. To extract the electrons as a beam, the source design also made use of results from magnetic mirror experiments showing that the electrostatic potential inside a biased ring in a magnetized plasma is uniform (in other words, it spans the gap) [@seve:92]. This enables one to construct a “virtual electrode” through which the electrons can pass and be extracted as a beam. By tailoring the size of this electrode to be near the transition region, the electron current extracted can be maximized. This enabled the continual extraction of several amps of electron current from a compact and reliable helicon plasma source [@long:08].
The size and bias of the electrode also influences the EEDF in the bulk plasma, and in turn the plasma density and electron temperature [@schw:13]. Figure \[fg:EEDF\] shows measurements from reference [@barn:14] of the current collected by a Langmuir probe in the bulk plasma for three different electrode areas, and for biases spanning below to above the plasma potential. A Maxwellian EEDF would be expected to lead to a linear profile in this measurement in which the slope is proportional to the electron temperature. When the electrode is biased a few volts below the plasma potential, the EEDF is found to consist of a cool and dense population of thermal electrons and a hotter, but much less dense, population of electrons on the tail of the distribution. There is a sharp divide between these populations at an energy corresponding to the potential drop of the ion sheath at the chamber wall. This is the typical expectation for the EEDF in a plasma without an electrode: The dense and cool thermal population is confined by the ion sheaths at the boundaries, while the hotter but much less dense tail population is associated with degraded primary electrons injected from the electron source (filaments or hot cathode). In contrast, as the electrode bias approaches or exceeds the plasma potential, the dense and cool population disappears and the entire EEDF has a temperature that is closer to that of the original higher energy tail population. This is interpreted to be a result of the electrode collecting electrons indiscriminate of energy; i.e., the ion sheaths at the chamber wall can no longer confine a low energy electron population because these electrons are rapidly lost to the electrode [@baal:07].
![Logarithm of the current collected by a Langmuir probe in a 20 mTorr helium discharge for five values of the electrode potential referenced to the plasma potential: $\phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}- \phi_p = -2.5$ V (black line), 0 V (blue line), 2.5 V (aqua line), 5 V (red line) and 10 V (maroon line). The numbers listed in the panel indicate the electrode surface area. This figure is reprinted from reference [@barn:14].[]{data-label="fg:EEDF"}](figure7.pdf){width="6.5cm"}
This change of the EEDF leads to changes in the bulk plasma parameters. Figure \[fg:nT\_profiles\] shows the corresponding current collection, plasma potential, electron density, electron temperature and light emission profiles as a function of electrode potential and for several electrode surface areas in the same discharge used to obtain the data for figure \[fg:EEDF\]. Data are shown from electrodes of seven different surface areas. For the smallest electrode size, the plasma potential, density and temperature were essentially constant regardless of the electrode bias. However, when the electrode area approached the transition region, the plasma potential rose along with the electrode potential, and a corresponding decrease of the electron density and increase of the electron temperature was measured. Each of these is a direct consequence of the observed EEDF behavior from figure \[fg:EEDF\]; the electron temperature increases because the cool confined electron population is lost, and the density decreases for the same reason.
Biased electrodes can thus be used to control (within limits) the plasma density and temperature [@demi:14]. Based on this principle, it has been shown that plasma parameters can be varied mechanically by moving a biased electrode into or out of a localized cusp magnetic field and thus changing the effective surface area of the electrode [@hers:92]. The mechanism is also similar to MacKenzie’s Maxwell demon, which has been used to control electron temperature in a plasma [@mack:71; @yip:13; @yip:15a]. In MacKenzie’s work, it was argued that a thin positively biased wire preferentially collects low energy electrons because of orbital motion effects, leading to an effective heating effect [@mack:71]. However, it was also shown that a biased planar electrode leads to essentially the same result due to the mechanism described above [@yip:13].
![Measurements of bulk plasma parameters as a function of the electrode bias referenced to the plasma potential ($\phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}- \phi_p$) in a 20 mTorr helium plasma. Numbers in the legend indicate the electrode surface area. Color of the data points indicates the predicted sheath regime: electron sheath (green), transition region (blue) and ion sheath (maroon). This figure is reprinted from reference [@barn:14].[]{data-label="fg:nT_profiles"}](figure8.pdf){width="5.0cm"}
Influence of increased ionization due to strong sheath fields
-------------------------------------------------------------
An electrode of sufficiently small surface area can be biased far above the plasma potential. As the energy of the sheath-accelerated electrons approaches the ionization potential of the neutral gas in a partially ionized plasma, a thin region of increased ionization will form. This thin region glows due to increased atomic excitation from the energetic electrons, as shown in figure \[fg:spot\_photo\]a, and is called “anode glow”. Since the ions born from ionization in this region are much more massive than electrons, they have a much longer residence time than electrons in this region, before being swept into the plasma by the electron sheath electric field. This causes a positive space charge near the electrode surface, and the potential profile in this region to flatten, as depicted in figure \[fg:type\]d. When the electron sheath potential drop is sufficiently large, and the neutral pressure is sufficiently high, enough ion space charge can build up that it causes a pressure imbalance between this region and the bulk plasma. This causes the plasma to rapidly self-organize into a new “anode spot,” or “fireball” state, as pictured in figure \[fg:spot\_photo\]b. In this configuration, the potential profile takes the form of a double layer with a large (typically several centimeter) quasineutral fireball discharge separated from the bulk plasma by a potential drop that is approximately the ionization potential of the neutral gas; see figure \[fg:type\]e [@torv:79; @cart:87; @song:91; @song:92d].
This section has introduced four types of sheaths that can form near a biased electrode in a low-pressure plasma: ion sheath, electron sheath, double sheath and fireball. The following four sections provide a more detailed summary of the recent progress in understanding each of these configurations.
![Photographs of an anode glow (a) and an anode spot (b). Figure reprinted from reference [@sche:17].[]{data-label="fg:spot_photo"}](figure9.pdf){width="7cm"}
Ion Sheaths\[sec:is\]
=====================
Conventional ion sheath properties\[sec:is\_standard\]
------------------------------------------------------
The basic properties of ion sheaths have been well characterized theoretically and experimentally. The topic has been summarized in several reviews and monographs [@riem:91; @fran:03a; @robe:13; @hers:05]. This section does not attempt to review this literature. Instead, it recalls a few of the main results regarding steady-state ion sheath properties in order to compare and contrast with them when discussing other sheath types in later sections.
Ion sheaths can often be modeled from a one-dimensional steady-state two-fluid description, consisting of the continuity equation $$\label{eq:continuity}
\frac{d}{dx} (n_s V_s) = S_{s},$$ where $S_s$ is a source term, the force balance equation $$\label{eq:fb}
m_s n_s V_s \frac{d V_s}{dx} = - n_s q_s \frac{d\phi}{dx} - \frac{d p_s}{dx} - \frac{d \Pi_{xx,s}}{dx} + R_{x,s}$$ and Poisson’s equation $$\label{eq:poisson}
\frac{d^2 \phi}{dx^2} = - \frac{\rho_q}{\epsilon_o} = - \frac{1}{\epsilon_o} (q_i n_i - e n_e).$$ Here, $p_s = n_s T_s$ is the scalar pressure, $\Pi_{xx}$ the stress tensor component, $R_x$ the friction force density due to collisions, $\rho_q$ is the charge density and the subscript $s$ denotes the species type (either electrons or ions).
In the typical circumstance that the ion sheath potential drop exceeds the electron temperature, the dominant terms of the electron force balance are the electric field and the scalar pressure gradient. The electron flux is approximately the ion flux $n_e c_s$, or less, so the inertia term is approximately $m_e/m_i$ smaller than the electric field or pressure terms. Also, the stress tensor is negligible in this case because only tail electrons lead to a stress gradient. In this case, the electron density obeys the Boltzmann density relation $n_e = n_o \exp(-e\phi/T_e)$.
Ions are usually well modeled as a drifting Maxwellian distribution, in which case the ion stress tensor can also be neglected. The ion scalar pressure is also typically negligible in low pressure discharges because $T_i \ll T_e$. Each of the other terms will contribute in some portion of the plasma boundary transition region, but the problem can be simplified by noting that Debye shielding limits most of the potential drop to a sheath region of a few Debye lengths from the boundary. At low-pressure conditions, this justifies a scale separation between a collisionless sheath and a weakly-collisional presheath. In the thin sheath region, collisions are negligible as long as $\lambda_{\textrm{\scriptsize D}}\ll \lambda_{\tiny \textrm{in}}$, where $\lambda_{\textrm{\scriptsize D}}$ is the Debye length and $\lambda_{\tiny \textrm{in}}$ is the ion-neutral collision mean free path. Here, the ion force balance then predicts ballistic motion, in which case $n_i(x) = J_o/[eV_i(x)]$, where $J_o$ is the ion current density at the sheath boundary. In the limit that there are no electrons in the ion sheath, using this in Poisson’s equation, multiplying by $d\phi/dx$ and integrating twice leads to the Child-Langmuir law [@lieb:05] $$\label{eq:cl}
J_o = \frac{4}{9} \sqrt{\frac{2e \epsilon_o^2}{m_i}} \frac{[\phi(x) - \phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}]^{3/2}}{x^2}$$ describing the electrostatic potential profile in the sheath.
The boundary between the non-neutral sheath and the quasineutral presheath can be described via an expansion in the charge density: $d^2\phi/dx^2 = -[\rho_q(\phi_o) + d\rho_q/d\phi|_{\phi_o} (\phi - \phi_o) + \ldots]/\epsilon_o$, where $\phi_o$ is the plasma potential at the “sheath edge”. The sheath edge is associated with the breakdown of charge neutrality, and can be identified as the location where the first order term in this expansion is the largest: $d^2\phi/dx^2 = -d \rho_q/d\phi |_{\phi_o} (\phi - \phi_o)$. Multiplying by $d\phi/dx$ and integrating leads to the condition $\epsilon_o E + d\rho_q/d\phi|_{\phi_o}(\phi - \phi_o)^2 = C$, where $C$ is a constant. Here $x=x_o$ is the sheath edge location. Since $\phi \rightarrow \phi_o$ on the sheath scale in the limit of small Debye length, $(x-x_o)/\lambda_{\textrm{\scriptsize D}}\rightarrow \infty$, $C$ must be zero [@riem:95]. We are then left with $d\rho_q/d\phi|_{\phi_o} = -\epsilon_o E^2/(\phi - \phi_o)^2$, which implies $d\rho_q/d\phi |_{\phi_o} \leq 0$, as the sheath edge criterion. Using $dn_s/d\phi = -(dn_s/dx)/E$ shows that this is the location where the charge density gradient first becomes positive $$\label{eq:edge_criterion}
\sum_s q_s \frac{dn_s}{dx} \biggl|_{x_o} \geq 0 .$$ Combining the continuity (\[eq:continuity\]) and force balance (\[eq:fb\]) equations, this implies [@baal:11c] $$\label{eq:gen_bohm}
\sum_s q_s \biggl[ \frac{q_s n_s - (n_s dT_s/dx + d \Pi_{xx,s}/dx - R_{x,s})/E}{m_s V_{s}^2 - T_s} \biggr]_{x_o} \leq 0$$ at the sheath edge.
For the typical case considered above the sheath potential drop is at least as large as the electron temperature ($e\Delta \phi_s \gtrsim T_e$), the term in parenthesis in equation (\[eq:gen\_bohm\]) is small for both electrons and ions. Here, $\Delta \phi_s$ is the potential drop in the sheath. Also making use of the conditions $m_i V_i^2 \gg T_i$ and $m_e V_e^2 \ll T_e$ in this situation, leads to the Bohm criterion for the minimum ion speed at the sheath edge [@bohm:49] $$V_i \geq c_s .$$ Here, $c_s = \sqrt{k_BT_e/m_i}$ is the ion sound speed. Thus, the conventional Bohm criterion that ions must flow supersonically into the sheath is obtained in this limit. Usually, this criterion is met via the minimum speed $V_i = c_s$, in which case the ion current density at the sheath edge is $J_o = en_{i,o} c_s$. The Child-Langmuir law (\[eq:cl\]) then implies that the total sheath thickness is [@lieb:05] $$\label{eq:st}
\frac{l_s}{\lambda_{\textrm{\scriptsize D}}} = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{3} \biggl( \frac{2e \Delta \phi_s}{T_e}\biggr)^{3/4} .$$ Thus, the sheath scale is characterized by the Debye length, but a sheath can be several Debye lengths thick if $\Delta \phi_s \gg T_e$. The sheath potential drop is determined from the global current balance, as described in section \[sec:structures\].
![Emissive probe measurements of the plasma potential in front of an electrode biased at -30 V referenced to ground. Each panel shows the same data set of a different spatial scale with 0 referenced to the sheath edge. The neutral pressure in the discharge was 0.44 mTorr and the electron density $2.1 \times 10^7$ cm$^{-3}$. Panel (b) shows a fit to the $\sqrt{x-x_o}$ scaling from equation (\[eq:phi\_sr\]). Figure reprinted from reference [@oksu:02].[]{data-label="fg:oksuz"}](figure10.pdf){width="8cm"}
The acceleration of ions required to meet the Bohm criterion occurs in a long ($\lambda_{\tiny \textrm{in}}$-scale) quasineutral region called the presheath. A key aspect of the transition between the sheath and the bulk plasma is the generation of particle flux, which is zero in the bulk but equal to the Bohm flux at the sheath edge. A full solution of the plasma potential profiles throughout this transition typically requires a numerical solution of equations (\[eq:continuity\])–(\[eq:poisson\]). Approximate solutions can be made by dividing the domain into regions and applying multiscale analysis. Much has been written about how to properly match the approximate solutions obtained this way [@riem:97; @fran:02; @kaga:02; @gody:90; @fran:00b; @fran:70; @bene:00; @riem:05; @gody:03].
Here, we briefly summarize the modified mobility-limited flow presheath model [@riem:97; @sher:89; @sher:91]. Consider a region near the sheath edge where collisions (presumed to be dominantly ion-neutral collisions) cause a friction force $R_{x,i} = - \nu_{\tiny \textrm{in}} V_i$, but do not generate significant flux $S_{i} = 0$, the ion continuity, force balance (with negligible ion pressure) and quasineutrality relation $dn/dx = -(e/T_e)En$ imply $$\label{eq:Vi_E}
V_i = \mu E \biggl(1 - \frac{V_i^2}{c_s^2} \biggr)$$ where $\mu = e/(m_i \nu_{\tiny \textrm{in}})$ is the ion mobility. Quasineutrality also implies $n(x) = n_o c_s/V_i = n_o \exp(-e\phi/T_e)$, so $$\label{eq:phi_cs}
\frac{e(\phi-\phi_o)}{T_e} = \ln \biggr(\frac{c_s}{V_i} \biggl).$$ Using $E = -d\phi/dx = (T_e/e) (dV_i/dx)/V_i$ in equation (\[eq:Vi\_E\]) provides a first order differential equation for the ion flow speed in the presheath $$\label{eq:dVi}
\biggl( \frac{c_s^2 - V_i^2}{V_i^2 \nu_{\tiny \textrm{in}}} \biggr) d V_i = dx .$$ Equations (\[eq:phi\_cs\]) and (\[eq:dVi\]) describe the potential and ion flow speed profiles in the presheath if the speed dependence of the collision frequency $\nu_{\tiny \textrm{in}}(V_i)$ can be specified.
Analytic solutions can be obtained in two common limits. In the constant mean free path limit ($\nu_{\tiny \textrm{in}} =V_i/\lambda_{\tiny \textrm{in}}$), $$\label{eq:vi_mfp}
\frac{V_i}{c_s} = \exp \biggl\lbrace \frac{1}{2} - \frac{x-x_o}{\lambda_{\tiny \textrm{in}}} + \frac{1}{2} W_{-1} \biggl[ - \exp \biggl(2 \frac{x-x_o}{\lambda_{\tiny \textrm{in}}} - 1 \biggr) \biggr] \biggr\rbrace$$ and $$\label{eq:phi_mfp}
\frac{e(\phi-\phi_o)}{T_e} = - \frac{1}{2} + \frac{x-x_o}{\lambda_{\tiny \textrm{in}}} - \frac{1}{2} W_{-1} \biggl[-\exp \biggl( 2 \frac{x-x_o}{\lambda_{\tiny \textrm{in}}} - 1 \biggr) \biggr] .$$ Here, $W_{-1}$ is the Lambert-W function. In the constant collision frequency limit $\nu_{\tiny \textrm{in}} \approx c_s/\lambda_{\tiny \textrm{in}}$, $$\label{eq:vi_nu}
\frac{V_i}{c_s} = \biggl[1 - \frac{x-x_o}{2\lambda_{\tiny \textrm{in}}} \biggl(1 - \sqrt{1 - \frac{4\lambda_{\tiny \textrm{in}}}{x-x_o} } \biggr) \biggr]$$ and $$\label{eq:phi_nu}
\frac{e(\phi - \phi_o)}{T_e} = \textrm{arccosh} \biggl( 1 - \frac{x-x_o}{2\lambda_{\tiny \textrm{in}}} \biggr) .$$
In either the constant mean free path model \[equation (\[eq:phi\_mfp\])\] or the constant collision frequency model \[equation (\[eq:phi\_nu\])\], the potential profile scales as the square root of distance for $(x-x_o)/ \lambda_{\tiny \textrm{in}} \ll 1$ [@riem:97] $$\label{eq:phi_sr}
\frac{e(\phi-\phi_o)}{T_e} = \sqrt{\frac{x-x_o}{\lambda_{\tiny \textrm{in}}}}$$ from either model. We note that although this provides a prediction for the electrostatic potential that continually matches sheath and presheath, it predicts that the electric field diverges as $x\rightarrow x_o$. Godyak has analyzed this region, showing that the electron density must be accounted for in this transition region [@gody:82]. Since the electron density obeys the Boltzmann relation, $dn_e/dx = -en_e E/T_e$, and the scale for variation of this density is the Debye length, the electric field at the sheath edge is actually expected to have a value of $E = T_e/(e\lambda_{\textrm{\scriptsize D}})$ [@gody:82]. Riemann has also predicted that the length of this “transition region” between sheath and presheath scales as $\lambda_{\tiny \textrm{in}}^{1/5} \lambda_{\textrm{\scriptsize D}}^{4/5}$.
The above predictions have been experimentally verified using emissive probe and laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) measurements [@sher:89; @sher:91; @oksu:02; @oksu:05; @clai:06; @jaco:07; @hers:05b; @goec:92; @moor:13]. An example is shown in figure \[fg:oksuz\]. These experiments validated a number of the features predicted above, including the Child-Langmuir law \[equation (\[eq:cl\])\] relating the sheath potential to distance from the electrode, the square root scaling of the presheath potential \[equation (\[eq:phi\_sr\])\], Godyak’s prediction of an electric field of $E=T_e/(e\lambda_{\textrm{\scriptsize D}})$ at the sheath edge, and the predicted $\lambda_{\tiny \textrm{in}}^{1/5} \lambda_{\textrm{\scriptsize D}}^{4/5}$ scaling of the transition region. Experiments using LIF to measure the ion velocity distribution function also validated the ion flow speed profiles in the presheath and that the Bohm criterion was met at its minimum value ($V_i=c_s$) at the sheath edge [@goec:92]. Similar tests of these analytic predictions have also been made using PIC and other kinetic simulations [@schw:90; @proc:90; @proc:91; @tsus:98; @jeli:07; @milo:11; @caga:17; @hara:18]. In addition to confirming aspects of the above model, its limitations have also been explored. Measurements have been made showing ion heating in the direction perpendicular to the sheath electric field [@lee:08], and the effect has also been observed in PIC simulations [@meig:07]. Much related work has also been done exploring sheaths in rf discharges [@kawa:99].
Drift-induced instabilities\[sec:is\_i\]
----------------------------------------
Traditional sheath models are based on steady-state kinetic or fluid descriptions in which the plasma smoothly transitions to the boundary. However, research over the past decade has revealed that instabilities can arise in the plasma-boundary transition region, particularly the presheath of low pressure and low temperature discharges [@hers:05; @baal:16; @hers:05b; @hala:00; @baal:09a; @baal:09b; @baal:11; @yip:10; @hers:11; @baal:15a; @sher:17; @adri:17]. These instabilities are driven by the presheath electric field, which generates a relative drift between species (either electron-ion or ion-ion). Since this is a weak driving force, the instabilities are typically of a kinetic nature in which depressions in velocity phase-space lead to Landau growth of thermal fluctuations. However, in the case of multiple ion species the instabilities can transition to a two-stream fluid instability [@baal:11]. The basic instability properties can be understood using a linear stability analysis based on the steady-state plasma parameter profiles discussed in section \[sec:is\_standard\]. The linear dispersion relation can be derived from the roots of the plasma dielectric function $$\hat{\varepsilon} ({\mathbf}{k}, \omega) = 1 + \sum_s \frac{q_s^2}{\epsilon_o k^2 m_s} \int d^3v \frac{{\mathbf}{k} \cdot \partial f_{s,o}({\mathbf}{v})/\partial {\mathbf}{v}}{\omega - {\mathbf}{k} \cdot {\mathbf}{v}} , \label{eq:ephat1}$$ where $\omega$ is the complex frequency, ${\mathbf}{k}$ the wavenumber and $f_{s,o}$ is the steady-state velocity distribution function of species $s$. The instabilities can, but do not always, feed back to cause observable changes in the steady-state properties. Examples from plasma with single or multiple ion species are considered below.
### Plasmas with one ion species\[sec:1is\]
In a plasma with one ion species, the presheath electric field causes the ions to drift toward the boundary until they reach a flow speed near the sound speed at the sheath edge ($V_i \lesssim c_s$ in the presheath). Meanwhile, the sheath causes some depletion in the tail of the electron distribution function. This generates a net flux of electrons to the boundary, but the peak of the electron distribution function is not shifted significantly in comparison to the background plasma. This situation can be unstable to ion-acoustic instabilities if the ratio of electron-to-ion temperature is sufficiently high ($T_e/T_i \gg 1$) and the neutral pressure is sufficiently low that collisions do not damp the excited waves. These conditions are often met in low-temperature plasmas.
![(top) Ion-acoustic stability boundaries for H$^+$ (black), Ar$^+$ (blue) and Xe$^+$ (red) ions. Contours with number labels show $\textrm{log}_{10}(\gamma_{\max}/\omega_{pi})$ for the H$^+$ plasma computed from equation (\[eq:gama\]). (bottom) Stability boundaries for the ion-acoustic instability in a H$^+$ plasma for four values of the ion drift speed: $V_i/c_s$ = 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1. Figure reprinted from reference [@baal:16].[]{data-label="fg:ia_stability"}](figure11a.pdf "fig:"){width="7.5cm"}\
![(top) Ion-acoustic stability boundaries for H$^+$ (black), Ar$^+$ (blue) and Xe$^+$ (red) ions. Contours with number labels show $\textrm{log}_{10}(\gamma_{\max}/\omega_{pi})$ for the H$^+$ plasma computed from equation (\[eq:gama\]). (bottom) Stability boundaries for the ion-acoustic instability in a H$^+$ plasma for four values of the ion drift speed: $V_i/c_s$ = 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1. Figure reprinted from reference [@baal:16].[]{data-label="fg:ia_stability"}](figure11b.pdf "fig:"){width="7.5cm"}
Figure \[fg:ia\_stability\] shows the ion-acoustic instability boundaries for common noble gas plasmas as a function of the ion flow speed and the temperature ratio, as well as the stability bounds in terms of wavenumber. These stability boundaries were obtained from equation (\[eq:ephat1\]) assuming that ions and electrons both have Maxwellian distribution functions, but with a flow shift indicated by the ion flow speed. The solutions were computed using the Penrose criterion [@penr:60], as described in [@baal:16]. At temperature ratios common to the presheath of low-temperature plasmas, ion-acoustic instabilities are expected even though the ion flow speed is subsonic. The wavelengths associated with these instabilities are predominately on the Debye length scale and shorter. Ion-acoustic waves convect in the direction of the ion flow. They are thus expected to be excited in the presheath, and grow in both amplitude and growth rate as they convect toward the sheath.
The standard approximation of the ion-acoustic dispersion relation has a real component $$\label{eq:ia_real}
\omega_r = {\mathbf}{k} \cdot {\mathbf}{V}_i - \frac{kc_s}{\sqrt{1 + k^2\lambda_{De}^2}}$$ and a growth rate $$\begin{aligned}
\nonumber
\gamma &=& - \frac{k c_s \sqrt{\pi/8}}{(1+k^2\lambda_{De}^2)^{2}} \biggl\lbrace \biggl( \frac{T_e}{T_i} \biggr)^{3/2} \exp \biggl[ - \frac{T_e/T_i}{2 (1 + k^2 \lambda_{De}^2)} \biggr] \label{eq:gama} \\
& + & \sqrt{ \frac{m_e}{m_i}} \biggl( 1 - \frac{V_i}{c_s} \sqrt{1 + k^2 \lambda_{De}^2} \biggr) \biggr\rbrace .\end{aligned}$$ The growth rate predicted by equation (\[eq:gama\]) is shown as contours in figure \[fg:ia\_stability\]. This shows that the growth rate is a small fraction of the ion plasma frequency (typically $~\sim 10^{-3}\omega_{pi}$) over the range of conditions relevant to the presheath. Although the growth rate is small compared to the plasma frequency, the wavelength is much smaller than the presheath length ($\lambda_{\textrm{\scriptsize D}}\ll \lambda_{\tiny \textrm{in}}$), so the excited waves can grow over several e-folding distances before reaching the sheath edge. It has been proposed that these excitations can cause wave-particle scattering that effectively enhances the Coulomb collision rate in the plasma-boundary transition region [@baal:08; @baal:10]. The increased effective collision rate can feed back to influence aspects of the ion and electron velocity distribution functions near the sheath edge.
Often, the rate of ionization and charge-exchange collisions is sufficiently rapid in the presheath that the ion velocity distribution function (IVDF) is not simply a flowing Maxwellian, but also consists of a “slow tail” associated with ions born within the presheath [@clai:06; @bach:95; @manf:04; @bilo:10; @pige:19]. This tail is an important part of the IVDF in many models of the plasma-boundary transition, including in the classical Tonks-Langmuir model [@sher:00; @tonk:29; @robe:09]. Its presence can influence applications, such as the aspect ratio achieved in reactive ion etching of semiconductors [@gott:93] because slow ions do not penetrate as deeply inside the trench. It has been proposed that the increased collisions associated with ion-acoustic instabilities may act to “thermalize” the ion distribution function as it progresses towards the sheath [@baal:11c]. This causes the distribution to approach a flowing Maxwellian and the “slow tail” feature to be reduced. An important aspect of this theory is that the ion-acoustic instabilities remain in a linear growth regime from the location of their excitation in the presheath until they are lost to the wall along with the ions. In this regime, a quasilinear kinetic equation has been developed that describes the resultant wave-particle scattering [@baal:08; @baal:10]. The collision operator in this regime can be thought of as occurring via “dielectrically dressed” (or quasiparticle) Coulomb collisions, for which the dielectric dressing includes the possibility of linear wave growth of the potential associated with the discrete particles. A consequence of this is that the associated collision operator obeys the Boltzmann H-theorem, and that the plasma evolves to a Maxwellian distribution due to the scattering of particles with the linear waves [@baal:10].
The proposal that instabilities can thermalize the IVDF has recently been tested experimentally using LIF by Yip [@yip:15c]. These experiments were conducted in a low-pressure ($p=0.1-0.3$ mTorr) low temperature ($T_e = 1-2.5$ eV) plasma. They observed that at sufficiently low neutral pressure, the IVDF was well approximated by a Maxwellian at the entrance to the presheath, gained a non-Maxwellian tail in the mid presheath, then became more Maxwellian near the sheath edge. The re-thermalization near the sheath edge was only observed at sufficiently low neutral pressure that ion-neutral collisions could not damp the ion-acoustic instabilities. Measurements of the critical pressure necessary to damp the instabilities were found to correspond well with the observed pressure threshold for the re-thermalization effect. Each of these predictions was found to be consistent with the model of reference [@baal:11c]. Recent Vlasov simulations have also pointed out that ion acceleration by the sheath electric field alone leads to the appearance of a “collisionless thermalization” effect that is akin to velocity bunching in charged particle beams [@coul:15]. They conclude that although wave-particle collisions are likely responsible for much of the experimentally observed thermalization, the collisionless mechanism also plays a role in understanding the observations. The Tonks-Langmuir model is the seminal kinetic theory for the IVDF in the plasma-boundary transition [@tonk:29]. It explicitly models a low-speed tail associated with ions born in the presheath. It has motivated many subsequent generalizations and extensions [@harr:59; @caru:62; @self:63], including ion source models [@proc:90; @emme:80; @biss:87; @sche:88], finite source temperature [@robe:09; @sher:01; @tskh:14], asymmetric plasmas [@vand:91], collisional plasmas [@riem:81], extended electron models [@sato:92; @gody:95] and electronegative discharges [@sher:99]. Since the Tonks-Langmuir model is a steady-state model, it does not consider the stability of the plasma, but one may question if a time-dependent generalization of the model (such as proposed in [@robe:09; @sher:01]) is stable.
A recent numerical solution of Sheridan’s time-dependent generalization [@sher:01] has shown that, in fact, the Tonks-Langmuir model is unstable [@sher:17]. However, the nature of the instability is different than the classical ion-acoustic instability. Electrons are considered adiabatic, being modeled solely via the Boltzmann density relation in this model $n_e = n_{eo} \exp(e\phi/k_BT_e)$, so the inverse Landau damping mechanism responsible for the ion-acoustic instability is not accessible. The instabilities are also observed to have a much lower frequency than the ion-acoustic instability ($\approx 0.1 \omega_{pi}$) and a longer wavelength than what would be the most unstable ion-acoustic mode (several $\lambda_{\textrm{\scriptsize D}}$) [@sher:17]. This work showed that the instability was consistent with a type of instability first predicted by Fried [@frie:60] in which the instability derives energy directly from the equilibrium electric field. Of course, in a real experiment electrons have a non-adiabatic response, and the usual ion-acoustic instability is accessible. It is still an open question if this low-frequency instability can exist in nature, or if it is particular to this mathematical model [@sher:17]. Numerical models including electron dynamics do model ion-acoustic instabilities [@kosh:15].
![Plot of the truncated electron velocity distribution function from equation (\[eq:fe\_trun\]) for four values of the critical velocity. Darker colors overlap the distribution function associated with lighter colors.[]{data-label="fg:evdf_draw"}](figure12.pdf){width="7.5cm"}
It has been predicted that excitation of ion-acoustic instabilities in the presheath may scatter electrons in addition to ions, and that the enhanced electron scattering (in comparison to the Coulomb collision level) can lead to a rapid thermalization of the electron distribution [@baal:09a]. Measurements of anomalously fast thermalization of electrons near plasma boundaries date to the earliest days of plasma physics research [@lang:25; @ditt:26]. Specifically, at a distance much smaller than the electron collision mean free path from the sheath, one would expect the EVDF in the direction perpendicular to the boundary to be devoid of electrons in the region of phase space corresponding to the population that is lost to the wall; i.e., the EVDF would have a truncated Maxwellian of the form illustrated in figure \[fg:evdf\_draw\]. Instead, the EVDF is often measured to have some tail population (even if it is not a full Maxwellian) at a distance from the boundary that is sufficiently short that it cannot be explained by standard Coulomb collisions alone. This observation has come to be known as Langmuir’s paradox [@gabo:55; @gody:15; @gorg:98; @tsen:03; @tsen:09]. In a wave-particle scattering model, such as quasilinear theory, the largest effect on scattering occurs for particles that have velocities resonant with the phase-velocity of the excited wave [@vede:62]. Since $v_{Te}/c_s \simeq \sqrt{m_i/m_e} \gg 1$, the ion-acoustic phase-speed is much slower than the speed associated with tail electrons, so one expects much less scattering of high energy electrons than low energy electrons. Nevertheless, applying the kinetic theory described above [@baal:08; @baal:10] shows that the effective Coulomb collision rate decreases as $v^{-3}$ from the phase-speed of the wave, and that even accounting for this decay, ion-acoustic instabilities are expected to significantly enhance electron scattering on the tail of the distribution [@baal:09a]. This proposal remains untested experimentally, however. No direct measurement of ion-acoustic instabilities in the presheath has yet been reported, and it has also been suggested that the sensitivity of the early EVDF measurements (which are made using Langmuir probes) were not sufficient to prove that there is a paradox [@gody:15; @gody:11].
### Plasma with multiple ion species \[sec:is\_mis\]
If the plasma contains multiple species of singly charged ions with different masses, each species will be accelerated to a different speed as it traverses the presheath electric field. The speed that each species obtains by the time it reaches the sheath edge is constrained by the sheath criterion from equation (\[eq:gen\_bohm\]). As in the single species case, the kinetic terms in parenthesis are expected to be small if the ion sheath potential drop is larger than the electron temperature. This leads to a generalization of the Bohm criterion for multiple ion species [@riem:95; @cook:80; @bene:96; @vale:96] $$\frac{n_1}{n_e} \frac{c_{s1}^2}{V_1^2} + \frac{n_2}{n_e} \frac{c_{s2}^2}{V_2^2} \leq 1 . \label{eq:bohm2}$$ As in the single species Bohm criterion, equality is expected to hold in this condition [@hers:11]. Even so, equation (\[eq:bohm2\]) alone does not uniquely specify the speed of each ion species at the sheath edge. Here, $c_{s,i} \equiv \sqrt{T_e/m_i}$ is the sound speed associated with species $i$.
It is often expected that the mean free path for Coulomb collisions between the ion species is much longer than the presheath length scale. In this case, the force balance for each species can be analyzed from equation (\[eq:fb\]) neglecting the Coulomb contribution to the friction force, analogously to what was done for a single species plasma in section \[sec:is\_standard\]. If the collision rate between each ion species and neutrals are not dramatically different, it is expected that the presheath potential drop $\Delta \phi_{\tiny \textrm{ps}}$ imparts the same kinetic energy to each species $\frac{1}{2}m_1 V_1^2 = \frac{1}{2}m_2 V_2^2$ [@fran:00]. Using this in equation (\[eq:bohm2\]) leads to the prediction that each species leaves the ion sheath at its individual sound speed: $V_1 = c_{s1}$ and $V_2 = c_{s2}$. This is the commonly quoted expectation for a multiple-ion-species plasma [@lieb:05]
Recent experiments using LIF measurements of the IVDFs throughout the presheath revealed the surprising result that ions often reach the sheath edge with a speed much closer to a common speed than is predicted by the individual sound speed solution [@hers:05; @hers:05b; @seve:03; @wang:06; @lee:07; @oksu:08]. If one considers the limit that the ions are strongly collisionally coupled with one another ($V_1=V_2$), equation (\[eq:bohm2\]) predicts that each reaches the sheath edge at the system sound speed [@lee:07c] $$c_s = \sqrt{\frac{n_1}{n_e} c_{s1}^2 + \frac{n_2}{n_e} c_{s2}^2 } ,$$ which is close to the measured values in an Ar-Xe plasma from [@lee:07]. However, this does not explain why the ions are collisionally coupled when Coulomb collisions are expected to be infrequent.
![Experimental measurement (using LIF) of the speed of argon ions (circles) and xenon ions (squares) at the sheath edge, as a function of the argon ion concentration. The electron temperature in the plasma was $T_e = 0.68$ eV. Solid lines show the theoretical prediction from equation (\[eq:dvc\]), the top and bottom lines indicated the individual sound speeds of argon and xenon and the black dash-dotted line indicates the system sound speed. Figure reprinted from reference [@hers:11].[]{data-label="fg:ar_xe_speeds"}](figure13.pdf){width="7.5cm"}
An explanation for these measurements has since been established [@baal:09b; @baal:11; @yip:10; @hers:11; @baal:15a; @zhan:12]. If the difference between the flow speed of each ion species exceeds a threshold value $|V_1 - V_2| \geq \Delta V_c$, ion-ion two-stream instabilities will be excited. Quickly after onset, increased scattering due to these instabilities rapidly increases the friction force between ion species so that the relative drift cannot significantly exceed the threshold condition for instability onset [@baal:09b; @baal:11; @baal:15a]. This leads to the prediction that $$|V_1 - V_2| = \min \lbrace \Delta V_c, |c_{s1} - c_{s2}| \rbrace \label{eq:dvc}$$ at the sheath edge. Equation (\[eq:dvc\]) along with the Bohm criterion from equation (\[eq:bohm2\]) combine to determine the speed of each ion species. The critical relative drift for instability onset can be predicted by solving for the dispersion relation from equation (\[eq:ephat1\]). Assuming that the ion species have flow-shifted Maxwellian distribution functions and that the wave phase speed of interest is much smaller than the electron thermal speed, equation (\[eq:ephat1\]) can be written $$\hat{\varepsilon} = 1 + \frac{1}{k^2 \lambda_{De}^2} \biggl[ 1 - \frac{z_1^2}{2} \frac{T_e}{T_1} \frac{n_1}{n_e} Z^\prime (\xi_1) - \frac{z_2^2}{2} \frac{T_e}{T_2} \frac{n_2}{n_e} Z^\prime (\xi_2) \biggr] \label{eq:ephat}$$ where $\xi_1 = \hat{{\mathbf}{k}} \cdot \Delta {\mathbf}{V} (\Omega -1/2)/v_{T1}$, $\xi_2 = \hat{{\mathbf}{k}} \cdot \Delta {\mathbf}{V} (\Omega + 1/2)/v_{T2}$, and $z_i$ is the ionic charge. The parameter $\Omega$ has been defined by the substitution $$\omega = \frac{1}{2} {\mathbf}{k} \cdot ({\mathbf}{V}_1 + {\mathbf}{V}_2) + {\mathbf}{k} \cdot \Delta {\mathbf}{V} \Omega . \label{eq:osub}$$ The critical speed $\Delta V_c$ can be obtained by numerically solving equation (\[eq:ephat\]) for the dispersion relation as a function of relative ion drift (at fixed plasma parameters) and determining the lowest value for which the growth rate of the most unstable mode becomes positive [@baal:15a].
This theory has been tested experimentally [@yip:10; @hers:11]. Figure \[fg:ar\_xe\_speeds\] shows a comparison between the theoretical predictions of this model and LIF measurements in an Ar-Xe discharge as a function of the argon ion concentration. When the concentration is in either the dilute or saturated limit, the speed of each species approaches the traditional expectation of individual sound speeds. No instability is predicted in these limits because $\Delta V_c > |c_{s1} - c_{s2}|$. In contrast, the speed of each species is found to approach the system sound speed at intermediate concentration, and the observed speeds to agree well with the model predictions. In addition to this evidence provided by the ion speed measurements, the presence of two-stream instabilities have been directly measured using Langmuir probes [@hers:05b; @hers:11]. The observed modification of ion speeds at the sheath edge has important implications for plasma boundary interactions, as well as global plasma models [@kim:15b].
The theory and experiments have been extended to plasmas containing three ion species [@yip:16; @seve:17]. These consist of argon, xenon, krypton mixtures [@yip:16] as well as argon, xenon, neon mixtures [@seve:17]. Initial tests indicate that the theory can be extended to three (or more) ion species, but the analysis becomes more complicated because there are more possible unstable modes to track. Here, two-stream instabilities between each possible combination of species must be considered and must include the presence of the third species. If any combination causes instability, it leads to an enhanced friction force between each species.
![Ion speed at the sheath edge of a He-Xe discharge from PIC simulations (circles) and theory predictions (shaded regions). The extrema of the shaded regions are from the theory predictions at the extrema of the plasma parameters encountered in the simulations: $T_e=4.0-3.8$ eV, $T_i = 0.40-0.45$ eV, $n_{\tiny \textrm{He}}/n_e = 0.035-0.07$, and $n_e = 1\times 10^{10}$ cm$^{-3}$. Dashed-dotted lines show the prediction of the collisional Bohm criterion from equation (\[eq:gody\_cb\]). Figure reprinted from reference [@adri:17].[]{data-label="fg:speeds_adrian"}](figure14.pdf){width="7.5cm"}
This model has also been tested using PIC simulations [@baal:15a; @adri:17; @gudm:11]. The first simulations appeared to contradict the model because the ion speeds were observed to enter the ion sheath with their individual sound speeds [@gudm:11], even though the prediction for $\Delta V_c$ of an early analytic model predicted instability [@baal:11]. It was subsequently questioned whether PIC simulations are capable of simulating the predicted instability-enhanced ion-ion friction force [@hers:12]. However, later analysis showed that the discrepancy was actually due to inaccuracies of the early analytic approximation for $\Delta V_c$, which didn’t apply at the simulated plasma conditions [@baal:15a]. Direct numerical solutions of equation (\[eq:ephat\]) showed that the full solutions of linear theory actually predicts stability at the conditions of the earlier simulations. Further PIC simulations were conducted for conditions where instability was predicted by linear theory, and the simulations observed both the presence of the instabilities and that the simulated ion speeds at the sheath edge agreed with the theoretical predictions (see figure 8 of [@baal:15a]). Furthermore, the simulations enabled one to directly simulate the instability-enhanced friction force, and associate the merging of ion speeds with this force. An explanation for why PIC simulations are able to capture the instability-enhanced friction force has recently been provided [@sche:19b].
The experiments and simulations described above pertain to low-pressure discharges (around 1 mTorr or less), but many plasmas of interest operate at higher neutral pressures. At sufficiently high neutral pressure, one would expect that ion-neutral collisions cause the ion-ion two-stream instability to damp, which will alter the predicted threshold condition ($\Delta V_c$). Recent work has extended the above analysis to account for ion-neutral collisions by including a BGK collision model in the linear dielectric function [@adri:17; @kim:17]. Experiments revealed good agreement with the predictions of the extended theory [@kim:17]. The extended model has also been shown to agree well with PIC simulations [@adri:17]. An example is shown in figure \[fg:speeds\_adrian\], which shows the speed of He and Xe ions in a mixture as a function of the neutral pressure. At low pressure, ion-neutral collisions are sufficiently rare that they can be ignored, but at pressures of a few mTorr (for these plasma conditions), collisions lead to a predicted increase in the relative ion drift at the sheath edge. For sufficiently high neutral pressure, the instability is completely absent and the ions enter the sheath with their individual sounds speeds. This figure also demonstrates that at even higher pressure the Bohm criterion itself \[equation (\[eq:bohm2\])\] breaks down. The figure shows a comparison with the collisionally modified Bohm criterion proposed by Godyak [@gody:90] $$\label{eq:gody_cb}
V_{i} = \frac{c_{si}}{\sqrt{1 + \frac{\pi}{2} \frac{\lambda_{De,s}}{\lambda_{\tiny \textrm{in}}}}} .$$ Although this was developed in the context of a single ion species plasma, it accurately models the speed of each species in this mixture at high pressure. This is likely because the two ion species are collisionally decoupled from one another at this pressure, so the assumptions of the model apply to each species individually. Describing how collisions modify the Bohm criterion remains a topic of continuing research [@fran:03b; @brin:11].
Weak ion sheaths and the transition to electron sheath\[sec:transition\]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The standard ion sheath properties summarized in section \[sec:is\_standard\] pertain to sheaths with a potential drop that is at least as large as the electron temperature. This is a common situation because it applies to floating boundaries and electrodes biased negatively with respect to the wall. However, it is often not satisfied for positively biased electrodes [@lunt:08]. Even if the electrode is large enough that current balance demands that the plasma potential is more positive than it (ion sheath regime), the sheath potential drop may be small. In fact, figure \[fg:area\] shows that the electrode area must be much larger than the transition area before the associated ion sheath potential drop is significantly larger than the electron temperature. Kinetic effects influence the plasma-boundary transition for these “shallow sheaths”.
Conservation equations and Poisson’s equation \[(\[eq:continuity\])–(\[eq:poisson\])\] can still be useful to analyze this situation, but additional information must be provided to close the equations based on non-local kinetic theory arguments. For instance, if the sheath potential drop is shallow, a large fraction of the electron distribution will be lost through the ion sheath, creating a large absence of particles in the EVDF corresponding to those electrons that reach the wall. Since the electron collision mean free path is often expected to be much larger than the scale of the plasma-boundary transition layer, electrons can be expected to have a truncated Maxwellian of the form [@baal:11c; @loiz:11] $$\label{eq:fe_trun}
f_e = \frac{\bar{n}_e}{\pi^{3/2} \bar{v}_{Te}^3} e^{-v^2/\bar{v}_{Te}^2} H(v_z + v_{\parallel,c})$$ where $v_{\parallel,c} = - \sqrt{2e(|\phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}| + \phi)/m_e}$ is the speed associated with the cutoff velocity at a potential $|\phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}| + \phi$ from the electrode. This distribution is illustrated schematically in figure \[fg:evdf\_draw\]. Here, $\bar{n}_e$, and $\bar{T}_e$ are parameters that characterize the distribution, whereas the density $n_e$ and temperature $T_e$ are defined via moments of the distribution function.
![Ion velocity in the sheath edge compared to $\bar{c}_s$ as a function of the cutoff velocity predicted by equation (\[eq:g\_bohm\_trunc\]) (black line). Also shown is the corresponding “fluid” result, which would be obtained by the same procedure, but neglecting the temperature and stress gradient terms in equation (\[eq:gen\_bohm\]). Figure reprinted from reference [@baal:11].[]{data-label="fg:eBohm"}](figure15.pdf){width="7cm"}
The assumption that electrons are collisionless in the plasma boundary transition provides a closure via the expression for $v_{\parallel,c}(\phi)$. The plasma-boundary transition based on this model was analyzed in Refs. [@baal:11c; @loiz:11]. Expressions for the density, temperature, flow velocity, heat flux and stress tensor associated with this distribution (provided in [@baal:11c; @loiz:11]) can be used directly in equation (\[eq:gen\_bohm\]) to derive a kinetic generalization of the Bohm criterion $$\label{eq:g_bohm_trunc}
V_i \geq \bar{c}_s \biggl\lbrace 1 + \frac{\bar{v}_{Te}}{v_{\parallel,c}} \frac{\exp (-v_{\parallel,c}^2/\bar{v}_{Te}^2)}{\sqrt{\pi} [ 1+ \textrm{erf} (v_{\parallel,c}/\bar{v}_{Te})]} \biggr\rbrace^{-1/2} .$$ Here, $\bar{c}_s \equiv \sqrt{\bar{T}_e/m_i}$ and $\bar{v}_{Te} \equiv \sqrt{2 \bar{T}_e/m_e}$. The solution of equation (\[eq:g\_bohm\_trunc\]) is shown in figure \[fg:eBohm\]. This shows that the ion flow at the sheath edge is predicted to be subsonic when the ion sheath potential drop is small compared to the electron temperature. Also shown is the “fluid” solution obtained by following the same procedure, but excluding the terms in parenthesis in equation (\[eq:gen\_bohm\]). This corresponds to what the standard Bohm criterion would predict if the electron flow velocity were included, and the electron density, flow velocity and temperature were interpreted via the appropriate moments of equation (\[eq:fe\_trun\]) [@baal:11c]. The difference between the curves illustrates the importance of temperature and stress gradients for a sheath with a small potential drop.
![(top) (a) Electron velocity distribution function in front of a biased electrode (0.5 V below the plasma potential), and (b) in front of a grounded wall nearby (20.5 V below the plasma potential). (bottom) The associated ion flow velocity profiles, with circles indicating the sheath edge location. Data from 2D PIC simulations. Figure reprinted with permission from Ref. [@baal:15b].[]{data-label="fg:k_bohm"}](figure16a.pdf "fig:"){width="8.5cm"}\
![(top) (a) Electron velocity distribution function in front of a biased electrode (0.5 V below the plasma potential), and (b) in front of a grounded wall nearby (20.5 V below the plasma potential). (bottom) The associated ion flow velocity profiles, with circles indicating the sheath edge location. Data from 2D PIC simulations. Figure reprinted with permission from Ref. [@baal:15b].[]{data-label="fg:k_bohm"}](figure16b.pdf "fig:"){width="7cm"}
Alternative approaches to a generalization of the Bohm criterion for arbitrary ion and electron velocity distribution functions have also been explored [@riem:91; @harr:59; @riem:81]. The result is typically called the “kinetic Bohm criterion”. For the model electron distribution function of equation (\[eq:fe\_trun\]) it leads to the same prediction as equation (\[eq:g\_bohm\_trunc\]); see [@baal:11c]. However, for other model distribution functions the two approaches lead to vastly different predictions [@baal:11c; @baal:15b; @baal:12]. For example, the conventional kinetic Bohm criterion predicts that the low-speed part of the IVDF contributes disproportionately to the restriction on the total ion fluid speed at the sheath edge [@riem:12], and even diverges if any part of the IVDF corresponds to ions leaving the sheath [@hall:62; @fern:05]. This distinction with the above model has been thoroughly discussed in [@baal:15b; @baal:12; @riem:12], where the two models have been compared with experimental and simulation data. The main point of this discussion is that in real plasmas ionization and charge exchange causes a small population of ions to traverse from the sheath, across the sheath edge, into the plasma. This small population is physically insignificant, but it causes the conventional kinetic Bohm criterion to break down. Comparison with a generalization of the Tonks-Langmuir model [@robe:09; @sher:01] to include a warm (finite temperature) ion source clearly illustrates the point; the small population of ions exiting the sheath does not significantly influence the Bohm criterion [@baal:15b; @baal:12]. Recently, Tsankov and Czarnetzki extended the kinetic Bohm criterion to account for charge exchange collisions and ionization, revealing a new term that connects the fluid-moment and conventional kinetic pictures [@tsan:17]. This work also shows consistency with measured IVDFs.
{width="16cm"}
The predictions of equation (\[eq:g\_bohm\_trunc\]) have also been tested using PIC simulations of biased electrodes [@baal:15b; @loiz:12]. In this case, the modification from the fluid Bohm criterion arises due to the non-local kinetic character of the electron distribution. Figure \[fg:k\_bohm\] shows an example from 2D PIC simulations in which part of the boundary was a positively biased electrode [@baal:15b]. The electrode size was sufficiently large that the plasma potential was higher than the electrode potential; as discussed in section \[sec:structures\]. The figure shows the EVDF at five locations in front of a biased electrode, in comparison with the grounded wall. The EVDF is significantly depleted beyond energies corresponding to the sheath potential drop (of approximately 0.5 V) in the case of the biased electrode; a feature that is not observed in front of the grounded wall. Equation (\[eq:fe\_trun\]) provides an accurate representation of this truncated distribution function. The figure also shows that flow speed of ions at the sheath edge is sonic near the wall, but subsonic near the electrode. A comparison of the simulated speed was found to be consistent with the prediction of equation (\[eq:g\_bohm\_trunc\]) [@baal:15b].
Using a similar 2D PIC simulation, a detailed study of the ion-to-electron sheath transition was carried out in Ref. [@sche:16]. In this case, the biased electrode was placed interior to the simulation domain (rather than as part of the boundary) and it was sufficiently small that it could be biased above or below the plasma potential (due to the constraints of global current balance discussed in section \[sec:structures\]). Figure \[fg:transition\] shows the results, which indicate that the electrode could be biased essentially equal to the plasma potential, in which case the potential profile was observed to be flat. The associated ion flow is far below the sound speed in this case, and transitions to zero net flow as the electrode becomes slightly positive; in agreement with equation (\[eq:g\_bohm\_trunc\]). It is also observed that the net electron flow becomes comparable to the electron thermal speed when the sheath potential is slightly below the plasma potential. This is due to the expected truncation of the EVDF by absorption from the electrode. For a small electrode, the EVDF was observed to have a loss-cone type distribution due to “shadowing” by the electrode, rather than the truncated distribution shown in figure \[fg:evdf\_draw\], which is based on a 1D picture.
The instabilities described in section \[sec:is\_i\] would also be expected for weak ion sheaths near the transition to electron sheaths, but the details of the dispersion relation and stability boundaries are modified by the non-Maxwellian electron distribution function. If the projection of the electron distribution into the direction normal to the boundary is of the truncated form described by equation (\[eq:fe\_trun\]), the linear dielectric response function can be written similarly to the standard form, but where the plasma dispersion function is replaced by the incomplete plasma dispersion function [@baal:13; @xie:13]. Reference [@baal:13] showed that an electron distribution function with a depleted tail modifies both the Langmuir wave and ion-acoustic wave dispersion relations in non-trivial ways. It shifts the real frequency of the waves to lower frequencies, and reduces the magnitude of Landau damping. For the ion-acoustic instability, the linear growth rate is observed to increase when the electron distribution function is depleted, and the most unstable wavenumber is observed to shift to longer wavelengths.
Electron Sheaths\[sec:es\]
==========================
Steady-state properties
-----------------------
Electron sheaths are thin regions of negative space charge in which the electric field is directed from the electrode toward the plasma, as shown in figure \[fg:type\] [@hers:05; @baal:07; @fred:07]. As discussed in section \[sec:structures\], an electron sheath will form near a positively biased electrode if its effective surface area is small enough to satisfy equation (\[eq:A\_es\]). A common example is the electron saturation regime of a Langmuir probe trace. Until recently, the description of electron sheaths (arising from the theory of Langmuir probes) was thought to be quite different from the description of ion sheaths. The difference stemmed from the assumption that the electrode collects the random thermal flux of electrons incident on the sheath edge. Correspondingly, the EVDF near the electron sheath edge was expected to be truncated, such as the half-Maxwellian depicted by the grey curve in figure \[fg:evdf\_drift\_fig\] and equation (\[eq:fe\_trun\]) with $v_{\parallel,c}=0$. This is a natural expectation. The electron collision mean free path is typically orders of magnitude larger than the electron sheath thickness, so the problem may be expected to be one characterized by the collisionless process of “effusion,” in which the region of velocity phase-space corresponding to electrons that have escaped to the electrode is missing.
The traditional expectation that the electrode collects the random thermal flux of electrons leads to different predictions for the electron sheath than an analogous ion sheath. For instance, applying the general form of a Bohm criterion associated with equation (\[eq:gen\_bohm\]) to the electron sheath, with the terms in parenthesis assumed negligible, would predict that the electron flow speed satisfies $$\label{eq:e_bohm}
V_e \ge v_{e{\textrm{\scriptsize B}}},$$ where $v_{e{\textrm{\scriptsize B}}} = \sqrt{k_{\textrm{\scriptsize B}}(T_e + T_i) / m_e} \approx \sqrt{k_{\textrm{\scriptsize B}}T_e/m_e}$ is the electron-equivalent Bohm speed. However, this is essentially satisfied by the electron flux associated with a truncated distribution. Taking equation (\[eq:fe\_trun\]) with $v_{\parallel,c}=0$, the moment definitions give $V_e = \sqrt{2 k_{\textrm{\scriptsize B}}\bar{T}_e/(\pi m_e)}$ and $T_e = \bar{T}_e[1-2/(3\pi)]$, so $V_e \approx 0.9 \sqrt{k_{\textrm{\scriptsize B}}T_e/m_e}$. Perhaps for this reason, an electron presheath was not thought to be necessary to satisfy the equivalent Bohm condition [@riem:91; @chen:06].
![Illustration of possible EVDF configurations near the edge of an electron sheath. Here, $\bar{V}/v_{Te}$ locates the peak of the distribution function. []{data-label="fg:evdf_drift_fig"}](figure18.pdf){width="7cm"}
Recently, the electron sheath was analyzed in more detail [@sche:15], indicating that it has more in common with ion sheaths than was previously thought. One surprising result is that the electron flux associated with the EVDF was observed to be primarily associated with a flow-shift, rather than a truncation [@yee:17]. That is, the peak of the distribution was observed to be shifted, as depicted by the maroon or green curves in figure \[fg:evdf\_drift\_fig\]. This indicates that the electron behavior is more akin to a collisional diffusive process, rather than a collisionless effusive process. Diffusive processes generally rely on collisions to maintain a near-equilibrium configuration. A detailed description of how sufficient collisions can be established remains an open question, but two observations have been made that suggest a source of this collisionality. First, the presheath is expected to be a long region where the electron pressure gradient establishes a flow shift (as described below). The electron collision mean free path should be compared with this comparatively long presheath length scale, rather than the thin electron sheath. Second, the flow shift excites instabilities that can significantly increase the effective electron collision rate (as described in sections \[sec:es\_lf\] and \[sec:es\_hf\]).
These observations suggest that the electron sheath can be described using a two-fluid analysis akin to the ion sheath, as described in section \[sec:is\]. Analogous to the ion sheath, the natural Debye scale of the electron sheath justifies a scale separation between collsionless sheath and weakly-collisional presheath. Assuming there are no ions in the electron sheath, and that the collisionless nature of electrons in this region implies that they traverse ballistically, $n_e(x) = J_o/[eV_e(x)]$ where $J_o$ is the electron current density at the sheath edge. Using this in Poisson’s equation, multiplying by $d\phi/dx$ and integrating leads to a Child-Langmuir law $$\label{eq:cl_e}
J_o = \frac{4}{9} \sqrt{\frac{2e\epsilon_0}{m_e}}
\frac{\left[\phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}- \phi(x)\right]^{3/2}}{x^2}.$$ This is analogous to equation (\[eq:cl\]), which was obtained for ion sheaths, but where the electron mass replaces the ion mass. Applying the electron Bohm criterion from equation (\[eq:e\_bohm\]), we expect that the electron flux at the sheath edge is $J_o = en_{e,o} v_{e,{\textrm{\scriptsize B}}}$. Using this leads to an expression for the electron sheath thickness $$\label{eq:st_e}
\frac{l_s}{\lambda_{De}} = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{3} \biggl( \frac{2e\Delta \phi_s}{T_e} \biggr)^{3/4} .$$ This is the same expression as was obtained for the ion sheath thickness in equation (\[eq:st\]). It is over twice as large as what is obtained based on the random flux model [@sche:15]. Simulation results are consistent with equation (\[eq:st\_e\]), as shown in figure \[fg:es\_profile\].
![Electrostatic potential and velocity profile in front of a biased electrode. Circles show results of PIC simulations, and lines show predictions of the theoretical models. Figure reprinted from reference [@sche:15].[]{data-label="fg:es_profile"}](figure19.pdf){width="7cm"}
The most important distinction between ion sheaths and electron sheaths arises in the presheath. Consider the force balance from equation (\[eq:fb\]). In the mobility-limited ion presheath, the electric field balances the ion inertia and ion friction terms, as described in section \[sec:is\_standard\]. In this case, the ion pressure is negligible because $T_e \gg T_i$, so the Boltzmann electron density relation (assuming constant temperature) and quasineutrality relation imply $dp_i/dx = enE(T_i/T_e) \ll enE$. The electron presheath is different. Here, if ions are assumed to obey the Boltzmann density relation in the presheath $n_i = n_o \exp(-e\phi/T_i)$, then $dp_e/dx = enE(T_e/T_i) \gg enE$. Thus, one expects that the electron pressure gradient, rather than the electric field, is the dominant force driving the electron drift. This is a qualitative difference with the ion presheath: in an electron presheath the electric field is weak, but the pressure gradient is strong enough to drive a large electron drift. Figures \[fg:transition\] and \[fg:es\_profile\] confirm that the general behavior predicted by this simple analysis is observed in PIC simulations; see Refs. [@sche:16; @yee:17; @sche:15] for details.
A modified mobility limited flow model for the electron presheath follows in an analogous fashion to that outlined in section \[sec:is\_standard\] for the ion presheath. In this case, equation (\[eq:Vi\_E\]) is replaced by $$\label{eq:mlf_es}
V_e = -\mu_e E \left(1 - \frac{V_e^2}{v_{e{\textrm{\scriptsize B}}}^2}\right),$$ where $\mu_e = e(1 + T_e/T_i) / ( m_e \nu_e)$ is the electron mobility. Here, one may distinguish the electron collision processes in terms of a momentum transfer rate, $\nu_c$, and an ionization rate, $\nu_S$: $\nu_e = \nu_c+2\nu_S$. The electron mobility, $\mu_e$, generally greatly exceeds the ion mobility in low temperature plasmas.
Profiles for the electrostatic potential and electron flow velocity in the electron presheath, similar to equations (\[eq:phi\_cs\])–(\[eq:phi\_nu\]) for the ion presheath, can be derived if one assumes that ions obey the Boltzmann density relation in the electron presheath $n_i(x) = n_o \exp(-e\phi/T_i)$. Based on this, quasineutrality $n(x)=n_ov_{e{\textrm{\scriptsize B}}}/V_e=n_o\exp(-e\phi/T_i)$ implies $$\label{eq:phi_es}
- \frac{e(\phi - \phi_o)}{T_i} = \ln \biggl( \frac{v_{e{\textrm{\scriptsize B}}}}{V_e} \biggr) .$$ This corresponds to equation (\[eq:phi\_cs\]) for the ion sheath, but where $T_e, c_s$ and $V_i$ are replaced by $T_i, v_{e{\textrm{\scriptsize B}}}$ and $V_e$, respectively. Equation (\[eq:phi\_es\]) highlights the expectation that the potential drop in an electron presheath is expected to be of order $T_i/e$, which is much smaller than the order $T_e/e$ potential drop of an ion presheath. Using $E=-d\phi/dx=(T_i/e)(dV_e/dx)/V_e$ in equation (\[eq:mlf\_es\]) provides $$\label{eq:es_ode}
\biggl(1+\frac{T_i}{T_e} \biggr) \biggl( \frac{v_{e{\textrm{\scriptsize B}}}^2 - V_e^2}{V_e^2 \nu_e} \biggr) dV_e = dx.$$ Typically $T_e\gg T_i$, so the first term in parenthesis is approximately unity. Equation (\[eq:es\_ode\]) provides the electron presheath analog of equation (\[eq:dVi\]).
Like the ion presheath, analytic solutions can be derived for the electron fluid velocity in the presheath in the constant mean free path or constant collision frequency limits. Assuming $T_e \gg T_i$ and the constant mean free path limit \[$\nu_e(x) = V_e(x)/\lambda_{e}$\] $$\frac{V_e}{v_{e{\textrm{\scriptsize B}}}} = \exp \left\{ \frac{1}{2} - \frac{x-x_o}{\lambda_{e}}
+ \frac{1}{2} W_{-1} \left[-\exp\left(2 \frac{x-x_o}{\lambda_{e}}
- 1 \right) \right] \right\}.$$ and $$- \frac{e(\phi - \phi_o)}{T_i} = - \frac{x-x_o}{\lambda_{e}} + \frac{1}{2}
+ \frac{1}{2} W_{-1} \left[ -\exp \left(2\frac{x-x_o}{\lambda_{e}} - 1
\right) \right].$$ These correspond to equations (\[eq:vi\_mfp\]) and (\[eq:phi\_mfp\]) from the ion presheath. Similarly, in the constant collision frequency limit ($\nu_e \approx v_{e{\textrm{\scriptsize B}}}/\lambda_e$) $$\frac{V_e}{v_{e{\textrm{\scriptsize B}}}} = 1 - \frac{x-x_o}{2\lambda_e} \biggl(1 - \sqrt{1 - \frac{4\lambda_e}{x-x_o}} \biggr)$$ and $$-\frac{e(\phi - \phi_o)}{T_i} = \textrm{arccosh} \biggl(1 - \frac{x-x_o}{2\lambda_e} \biggr) .$$ These correspond to equations (\[eq:vi\_nu\]) and (\[eq:phi\_nu\]) from the ion presheath. A comparison of these models to PIC simulations is shown in figure \[fg:es\_profile\]. As in the ion presheath from equation (\[eq:phi\_sr\]), both the constant mean free path and constant collision frequency models reduce to a square root potential profile $$- \frac{e(\phi - \phi_o)}{T_i} = \sqrt{\frac{x-x_o}{\lambda_e}}$$ in the neighborhood of the sheath edge $(x-x_o)/\lambda_e \ll 1$.
{width="14cm"}
In comparison to an ion presheath, three important distinguishing features of the electron presheath are: (1) The electron flow speed is much larger in an electron presheath than the ion flow is in an ion presheath ($v_{e{\textrm{\scriptsize B}}}/c_s \approx \sqrt{m_i/m_e} \gg 1$). (2) The change of the electrostatic potential is much smaller in the electron presheath than it is in an ion presheath (since $T_e \gg T_i$). (3) The length scale associated with the electron presheath is much larger than the scale associated with an ion presheath at similar discharge conditions (since $\lambda_e \gg \lambda_{\textrm{\scriptsize{in}}}$). In low-temperature plasmas in which the dominant electron collision process is due to interactions with neutrals, the constant collision frequency model is often expected to apply. In this limit, reference [@sche:15] has shown that the expected electron presheath length would be approximately 5-10 times longer than an ion presheath in a helium discharge at common low-temperature plasma conditions. The presence of collisions due to instabilities may modify the electron presheath length scale. Evidence for this is provided by the PIC simulations of [@sche:15], which observed a finite-scale electron presheath even though they did not include electron neutral collisions; see figure \[fg:es\_profile\]. This connection between the expected flow and potential profiles of 1D ion and electron presheaths relies on the assumption of a Boltzmann density relation for the species that is reflected back toward the plasma (electrons in an ion presheath or ions in an electron presheath). Such a 1D model is predicated on the assumption that the boundary can be treated as an infinite plane, which is justified only if the characteristic scale of the boundary is much larger than the presheath length. This is often justified when ion sheaths are encountered because the boundary surface is usually at least several cm, whereas the ion presheath scale is usually less than a few cm. However, expectations change for an electron sheath. As described in section \[sec:structures\], electron sheaths can form only near sufficiently small electrodes. In the common laboratory experiments described above, this often limits the maximum electrode size to a few cm in diameter. It was also just shown that the electron presheath is usually at least as long as an ion presheath. Because there is not a large scale separation between the size of the electrode and the size of the electron presheath, the infinite planar model, and hence the 1D ion Boltzmann density relation, do not apply.
This geometrical effect associated with the finite electrode size has been studied using 2D PIC simulations [@sche:16; @yee:17; @sche:15] and experiment [@yee:17; @hood:16]. Figure \[fg:e\_sheath\_fig\] shows a comparison of measured and modeled properties of ion and electron sheaths. The left panel shows the electron density and electron flux vectors. The electron sheath is observed to cause electrons to “funnel” into the electrode, influencing the electron flow far beyond the thin region of negative space charge. The measurements and simulations both support the prediction that the electron sheath and plasma are adjoined by a long presheath region Although the electric field is weak in this region, the pressure gradient is large enough to drive a fast electron drift [@sche:16; @yee:17]. The funneling effect causes the presheath to have a two-dimensional nature.
As a consequence, it has been shown that the ion density relation depends on the ion inertia [@sche:15]. This work provided a model for the ion density that generalizes the Boltzmann density relation to include ion inertia, which was found to provide fair agreement with the simulation results when the simulated plasma parameters were used as the boundary conditions. These simulations also showed a counterintuitive observation where ions were found to flow toward the electron sheath. This was counterintuitive because the electron sheath electric field points from the electrode into the plasma, and should therefore reflect ions back to the plasma. The observation was later found to be associated with the boundary conditions nearby the electrode: different results were observed if the electrode was embedded in a surrounding dielectric or if it was “free” [@hood:16]. Here, ion drift was actually due to the ion sheath associated with the surrounding dielectric, rather than the electron sheath itself. This aspect is discussed in more detail in section \[sec:ds\_ss\]. The conclusion is that, while a one-dimensional analysis can serve to guide a physical understanding of the electron sheath, one should be cautious that multi-dimensional effects are important when the electron presheath scale is larger than the electrode scale, which is a common situation.
![PIC simulation of the two-dimensional electron velocity distribution function at the edge of an electron sheath. Figure adapted from reference [@sche:16].[]{data-label="fg:loss_cone"}](figure21.png){width="7cm"}
Finite electrode size also influences the structure of the EVDF. The model EVDF shown in figure \[fg:evdf\_drift\_fig\] is based on a 1D picture where no electrons have a negative velocity in the direction normal to the sheath, corresponding to the expectation that all electrons that reach the infinite planar boundary are collected. Figure \[fg:loss\_cone\] shows the 2D EVDF from a simulation where the electrode was located interior to the plasma (a free electrode) [@sche:16]. This shows that the electron distribution has both a flow-shift and a loss-cone type truncation. The conical feature is explained as shadowing due to the electrode: all electrons that reach the electrode are collected, but electrons can also enter the presheath from oblique angles and fill a region with a velocity component directed normal to and facing away from the electrode [@sche:16]. The angle of the loss cone is influenced by the size of the electrode, as well as distance from the electrode surface. Projecting the EVDF in the direction normal to the sheath shows a distribution resembling a drifting Maxwellian, but the projection parallel to the sheath shows a distribution with a depleted interior associate with the loss cone. These results show that the experimental reality often does not conform to either of the simple assumed models (truncated or drifting), but is a combination of them and is often fundamentally two-dimensional. Similar simulations of the EVDF have also been made in the case of electrodynamic tether simulations using a Vlasov-Poisson approach [@sanc:13; @sanc:14].
Low frequency (ion) instabilities\[sec:es\_lf\]
-----------------------------------------------
The fast electron drift toward the electrode in an electron presheath generates current-driven instabilities. The right side of figure \[fg:e\_sheath\_fig\] illustrates the normalized space charge above both an electron and an ion sheath, obtained from 2D PIC simulations. A substantial fluctuation at a frequency of approximately 1 MHz is observed in the case of an electron sheath, but is either absent or of a much lower power for the ion sheath. Reference [@sche:15] provides a detailed examination showing that these are current-driven ion-acoustic instabilities. Since the differential flow between electrons and ions is near the electron thermal speed, the usual ion-acoustic instability dispersion relation from equations (\[eq:ia\_real\]) and (\[eq:gama\]) does not apply (the conventional relation assumes a sufficiently small relative drift). However, the wave is on the same ion-acoustic branch, and a simple extension for the dispersion relation was obtained $$\label{eq:ia_dr}
\frac{\omega}{\omega_{pi}} \approx \frac{k\lambda_{De}}
{\sqrt{k^2\lambda_{De}^2 - \frac{1}{2}Z'(-V_e/v_{T_e})}},$$ where $Z'$ is the derivative of the plasma dispersion function.
Figure \[fg:e\_inst\_fig\] shows a 2D Fourier transform of the modeled ion density in the vicinity of an electron sheath, with the real and imaginary components of the dispersion relation predicted by equation (\[eq:ia\_dr\]) overlaid. There is good qualitative agreement with the predicted wave frequency, indicating that the flow of electrons is indeed inducing a streaming instability. The cascading of power to higher wavenumbers than the most linearly unstable modes may provide evidence for a nonlinear character of the instability. Only wavenumbers up to 30 cm$^{-1}$ were resolved in this simulation. The ion waves generated by this instability convect toward the electron sheath, but since ions are turned around by the electric field in the sheath, some of the wave power is reflected. The reflection of electrostatic waves by an electron sheath was first studied theoretically by Baldwin [@bald:67]. Recently, experimental measurements have been presented for the reflection coefficient using LIF diagnostics [@beru:18].
![A 2D Fourier transform of ion densities in the vicinity of an electron sheath with real (red) and imaginary (yellow) components of the dispersion relation from equation (\[eq:ia\_dr\]) overlaid. The two lines show the predictions at electron flows of $0.5v_{eB}$ and $0.9_{eB}$, which is a characteristic range encountered near the electron sheath. Figure reprinted from reference [@sche:15]. []{data-label="fg:e_inst_fig"}](figure22.png){width="7cm"}
Measurements of ion-acoustic noise associated with an electron sheath were first made by Glanz *et al* [@glan:81] using a spectrum analyzer to measure oscillations in the current collected by the electrode. The measured spectra were peaked slightly below the ion plasma frequency, which is consistent with the expected wave frequency of ion-acoustic instabilities excited by the relative electron-ion drift. A range of plasma densities was explored. The spectra were also observed to sharpen when a negatively biased probe was brought within several centimeters of the positive electrode.
![Ion-acoustic instability boundaries for a H$^+$ plasma computed from equation (\[eq:ephat1\]) for Maxwellian distributions. Contours show lines of constant $\textrm{log}_{10} (k_{\tiny \textrm{max}} \lambda_{De})$, where $k_{\tiny \textrm{max}}$ is the maximum unstable wavenumber. This figure corrects that shown in figure 1 of reference [@baal:16], where it was incorrectly stated that there is a second region of stability at sufficiently high temperature ratio and flow speed.[]{data-label="fg:ia_vt"}](figure23.pdf){width="7cm"}
The existence of ion-acoustic instabilities in the electron sheath and presheath is likely to contribute an increase in the effective collision rate, akin to that seen in the ion presheath [@baal:11]; see section \[sec:1is\]. In fact, since the differential flow between electrons and ions is much larger in the case of the electron sheath, the unstable waves have a much larger growth rate and the associated fluctuations have a much large amplitude (as shown in figure \[fg:e\_sheath\_fig\]). Correspondingly, the predicted wave-particle scattering will be larger. Figure \[fg:ia\_vt\] shows the stability boundaries for the ion-acoustic wave computed from equation (\[eq:ephat\]) assuming that both ions and electrons have Maxwellian distribution functions, but with a differential flow speed $\Delta V = |V_e-V_i|$. This shows that for a common temperature ratio $T_e/T_i \gtrsim 10$, the instability is excited at a drift speed that is much smaller than the electron thermal speed. This implies that much of the electron presheath is expected to be unstable. Consequently, the waves will have room to undergo several exponentiations of amplitude before reaching the boundary. It is thus likely that the waves become saturated due to nonlinear effects. No detailed study of the saturation mechanism has yet been presented, but it is known that ion trapping is a common mechanism influencing ion-acoustic waves of this type as they grow to sufficiently large amplitude [@onei:65].
Wave-particle scattering by these instabilities may be a contributing factor to the observed flow-shift in the presheath. As stated at the beginning of this section, such diffusive (rather than the commonly assumed effusive) behavior relies on sufficient collisions to establish a pressure gradient and transition to the bulk plasma. This remains an open question, but the instabilities are clearly observed and the fluctuation amplitudes are large, which provides strong indirect evidence for the importance of wave-particle scattering. Such scattering may also contribute to filling in the loss cone observed in figure \[fg:loss\_cone\] as the electron flow transits through the presheath. This would have repercussions for the presheath length scale and the evolution of the electron velocity distribution as the flow transits the presheath.
High frequency (electron) instabilities\[sec:es\_hf\]
-----------------------------------------------------
In addition to the low frequency ion-acoustic branch instabilities, a series of measurements of high-frequency fluctuations on the collected current have been observed for positively biased electrodes [@sten:88; @sten:89]. The frequency of these fluctuations is near the electron plasma frequency. Stenzel proposed an explanation as a sheath-plasma resonance instability arising from the negative resistance associated with the finite transit time of electrons through the sheath [@sten:88]. A circuit model was developed, and basic features of the model were shown to agree with measurements [@sten:89]. In this explanation, the fluctuations are caused by wave evanescence, rather than a plasma instability. Harmonics are radiated as electromagnetic waves, such that the electrode acts as an antenna.
![\[law98fig3\] The disruption of circulation in dust grains induced by the positive bias of an electrode. Figure reprinted from reference [@law:98].](figure24.png){width="8.5cm"}
More recent work has also explored high-frequency instabilities near the electron sheath of spherical electrodes in magnetized plasmas [@sten:10]. These instabilities were observed to propagate with the average ${\mathbf}{E} \times {\mathbf}{B}$ drift and to form toroidal eigenmodes. They were also attributed to the electron inertia in the electron sheath.
Applications
------------
There are several potential applications of a better understanding of electron sheaths. The most commonly encountered situation is the collection of the electron saturation current of a Langmuir probe. Because this occurs in a regime in which no electrons are repelled, the amount of current collected is related to the plasma density and electron temperature. A detailed understanding of electron sheaths may open new possibilities for the extraction of these values in the electron saturation of a Langmuir probe trace. Hass *et al* [@haas:05] have improved the fidelity of microwave “hairpin” probe measurements by developing a method to account for the influence of the electron sheath [@sten:76]. Another possible application in the diagnostics realm is in the production of X-band microwaves from a biased electrode [@blio:12]. Experiments have indicated the possibility of the production of microwaves at $\sim10$ GHz at 10s of mW in association with the sheath-plasma resonance instability [@blio:12].
Electron sheaths have also demonstrated their utility in flow control. ${\mathbf}{E}\times{\mathbf}{B}$ flows have been demonstrated using different combinations of positively and negatively biased electrodes in scrape-off-layer plasmas of tokamaks [@zweb:09; @thei:12]. These flows have been utilized to manipulate the density and temperature profiles in such plasmas [@zweb:09]. Electron sheaths have demonstrated the ability to manipulate the circulation in a dusty plasma [@law:98] such as the one shown in figure \[law98fig3\]. They also arise near spacecraft in the ionosphere [@sing:96].
Finally, we note that Schiesko *et al* [@schi:08] have recently modeled, and studied experimentally, the influence of secondary electron emission on electron sheath properties. The dynamics of emitted electrons within the electron sheath may also be utilized in new applications, such as emission of electromagnetic radiation.
Double Sheaths\[sec:ds\]
========================
Steady-state properties\[sec:ds\_ss\]
-------------------------------------
Double sheaths, also referred to as virtual cathodes, are potential structures in which a significant potential drop forms in front of the electrode surface, before rising again in the bulk plasma. They can arise near biased electrodes due to current balance requirements associated with size, geometry or material properties [@baal:07; @hood:16; @cho:90; @bail:06; @sun:15; @yip:15b], or due to electron emission from the electrode [@hobb:67; @guer:70; @chen:11; @li:12; @schw:15a]. The plasma potential may be above or below the electrode potential, depending on the experimental circumstances. A double sheath is a type of double layer in that it consists of adjacent regions of positive and negative space charge, as indicated in figure \[fg:type\]. A double sheath is distinguished from a fireball double layer by the feature that the region of strong electric field is adjacent to the surface of the electrode, rather than separated from it by a quasineutral region of plasma [@hers:85; @char:07]. However, historically the term has sometimes also been used to describe double layers in the latter context [@andr:71]. Double sheaths were first observed, and named, by Langmuir [@lang:29]. They can exist in transient [@intr:88] or steady [@hers:87] states.
Double sheaths may be present in unexpected circumstances, such as near Langmuir probe diagnostics. Yip and Hershkowitz have shown that the presence of a virtual cathode (double sheath) can flatten the measured I-V trace, leading to an overestimation of the measured electron temperature [@yip:15b]. The effect was observed to have an especially pronounced influence at low pressure, where the virtual cathode was deeper. This example emphasizes the importance of understanding when double sheaths form. In this experiment, the formation was thought to be associated with the electrode size, in which the criterion based on the area ratio of electrode to chamber wall was near the transition region discussed in section \[sec:gc\]. This effect arising from the size of the Langmuir probe depends not only on the probe itself, but also on the global geometry of the plasma confinement device. To avoid the potential for misinterpretation of probe characteristics, the probe must be sufficiently small.
![\[fg:hood\_electrode\] Schematic drawing of the free electrode (left) and embedded electrode (right) configurations used in experiments studying electron sheaths. Figure reprinted from reference [@hood:16].](figure25.pdf){width="8.5cm"}
Predicting when double sheaths form can be complicated, and they can lead to counterintuitive effects on the plasma behavior. For example, a recent experiment studied the ion flow pattern in front of a small positively biased electrode in either a free or embedded configuration [@hood:16]; see figure \[fg:hood\_electrode\]. The “free” electrode was nearly a completely exposed conducting electrode, with just a small area of dielectric on the back side used to hold the electrode in place. The “embedded” electrode consisted of a similar conducting disk, but this time embedded in a larger dielectric disk. Both configurations were implemented in an experiment and simulated using 2D PIC simulations. In each case, the electrode was biased at 10V above ground, which was approximately 5V above the plasma potential in these experiments. An electron sheath formed, and it was expected that the ions would not be significantly influenced by the electrode, except for the expected density drop in the electron sheath close to the electrode.
Figure \[fg:hood\_ivdf\] shows that a counterintuitive effect was observed in the ion flow. The figure shows measurements of the radial and axial components of the IVDF made along a line extending from the center of the electrode at several axial positions. As expected, both the radial and axial components of the IVDF do not change significantly with position for the free electrode, showing only the expected density drop in the sheath region. In contrast, a strong ion drift was measured moving *toward* the embedded electrode. A slight radial component to the drift was also measured in the 0.5 cm region above the electrode. This is counterintuitive because an electron sheath is expected to repel ions back toward the plasma, not accelerate them toward the electrode.
![\[fg:hood\_ivdf\] Ion velocity distribution functions (IVDFs) measured in front of the free and dielectric-embedded electrodes shown in figure \[fg:hood\_electrode\]. Speed is indicated in units of the sound speed, $c_s$. Figure reprinted from reference [@hood:16]. ](figure26.pdf){width="8.5cm"}
The explanation for this effect is revealed by the electrostatic potential maps shown in figure \[fg:hood\_probe\]. In the case of the free electrode, the electrostatic potential drops essentially monotonically from the electrode into the plasma, as expected. In contrast, a saddle point is observed in front of the embedded electrode, which translates to a double sheath along the one-dimensional axial cut in front of the electrode. The mechanism for formation in this case is not global current balance, but the presence of the dielectric. As discussed in sections \[sec:is\] and \[sec:es\], the plasma potential drops $T_e/2e$ or more in an ion presheath, whereas the plasma potential rises by a much smaller amount characteristic of $T_i/e$ in an electron presheath. For this reason, the presheath associated with the ion sheath in front of the dielectric spreads in front of the electrode, causing the ion presheath to “shadow” the electrode. The superposition of electron sheath and ion presheath can take the form of a double sheath. This can be seen in the 2D maps of the potential profile, as well as the axial cutaway shown in figure \[fg:hood\_probe\]. Furthermore, a similar series of IVDF measurements along the axis were made at different radial positions of the electrode. The 2D map of the ion flow vectors shows precisely this effect; the ion flow is “diverted” around the electrode and into the surrounding dielectric, see figure 5 of [@hood:16].
![\[fg:hood\_probe\] Potential profiles from free and embedded electrode configurations obtained using an emissive probe. The electrode radius was 1 cm. Note that the scale used to describe the potential differs in each plot. Figure reprinted from reference [@hood:16].](figure27.pdf){width="6cm"}
The 2D PIC simulations were found to agree quantitatively well with the measured IVDFs. The detail afforded by the simulations also revealed features of the 2D IVDF profile that were not possible to measure experimentally; see figure 7 of [@hood:16]. These show that the IVDF in the case of an embedded electrode obtains a drift nearly directly toward the electrode along the axis extending from the center of the electrode, but that the drift has nearly equal components in the axial and radial directions for radial positions toward the edge of the electrode. In contrast, the IVDF is observed to be nearly Maxwellian without a drift at all radial locations in front of the free electrode. The axial electrostatic potential profiles from the 2D simulations did not appear to display a virtual cathode, but the 2D potential structure had a saddle-point shape similar to what was measured in the experiment.
Ion trapping\[sec:it\]
----------------------
Perhaps the most persistent open question regarding double sheaths is understanding when they can be steady-state solutions in partially ionized plasmas. From the viewpoint of the one-dimensional potential profile, it has been noted for a long time that any type of ion-neutral collision, such as charge exchange or ionization, would cause a population of ions to become trapped in the potential well [@fore:86]. Trapped ions would quickly fill the potential well, altering the potential profile leading to its disappearance [@hers:87]. This has led to the thought that there must either be a mechanism present to “pump” these ions from the potential well [@hers:87; @fore:86], or that double sheaths are a transient phenomenon [@intr:88]. Another possibility may be that the potential profile fluctuates at a frequency that is low enough to pump ions, perhaps due to an instability, and that the double sheath potential results only in the time-averaged sense. There seems to be evidence for each of these possible mechanisms.
The previous example showed a double sheath resulting from the presheath of a surrounding dielectric material shadowing the electrode. However, double sheaths have also been measured near free electrodes [@baal:07; @fore:86], such as that shown in figure \[fg:NAF\_sheath\]. In both of these cases, one side of a disk shaped electrode was conducting, while the back side was covered with dielectric material. Forest and Hershkowitz showed that ion pumping in this configuration can be provided by a saddle shaped potential profile that extends around the side of the electrode providing a path for ions to reach the dielectric [@fore:86]. The double sheath in front of the electrode itself does not seem to be associated with the dielectric in this case, yet the dielectric is necessary to provide the ion pumping. This is an example of the plasma self-organizing to create a complex potential structure that maintains a steady-state. The work showed that even something as innocuous as a fingerprint on the electrode surface can provide a means of pumping ions [@fore:86]. Increased neutral pressure was observed to decrease the depth of the potential well because the source of trapped ions increased at a faster rate than the ability for ions to be pumped from the potential well. Double sheaths have similarly been observed in other experiments with a dielectric backing on the biased electrode [@baal:07; @bail:06].
A condition for the neutral density required to maintain sufficient ion pumping to sustain the double sheath was developed by applying current balance arguments within the potential well: trapped ion production by ionization and charge exchange must be less than the loss out the edges of the potential well. Combining this with a global current balance condition led to the prediction that the neutral density must satisfy [@fore:86] $$n_n \leq \frac{n_t/n_i}{\sqrt{A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}/\pi} [\sigma_{cx} + A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}/(V2n_o)]}$$ to maintain the double sheath. Here, $n_t$ is the trapped ion density, $n_i$ is the background ion density, $\sigma_{cx}$ is the charge-exchange cross section and $V$ is the plasma volume.
Forest and Hershkowitz also derived an expression for the location of the minimum of the double sheath based on the Child-Langmuir law, as described in section \[sec:is\_standard\], and an assumption that the electron flux is the thermal flux reduced by the Boltzmann factor: $\Gamma_{e,{\textrm{\scriptsize th}}} \exp(-e\phi/T_e)$. The result is $$d_\textrm{\tiny min}^2 = 1.0 \times 10^6 \frac{(\phi_p - \phi_{\textrm{\tiny dip}})^{3/2}}{n_e \sqrt{T_e}} \biggl( 1 + \frac{2.66}{\sqrt{eV_p/T_e}}\biggr) .$$ This was found to agree well with the experiments in [@fore:86], and was later validated independently by Bailung [@bail:06]. The latter work also showed that an applied ion beam increases the rate of ion trapping, rather than ion leaking due to pumping. It was observed that the threshold ion beam energy required to suppress double sheath formation was nearly equal to the electrode potential.
Wang [@wang:86] have shown that a double sheath can be maintained in the time-averaged sense if the applied electrode bias includes an rf component at the appropriate frequency (1-500 kHz in this case). In this experiment the electrode was entirely conducting, preventing the possibility of ion pumping to nearby dielectric. Ion pumping was naturally provided in this case during the portion of the rf cycle in which the plasma potential was above the electrode potential. Electric field reversals that appear similar to double sheaths in the time-averaged potential structure in rf capacitively coupled discharges have also been observed [@schu:08].
Fluctuations of the electrode potential suggest that plasma instabilities may also provide a natural mechanism by which ions could be pumped from the potential well [@barn:14]. In this case, ions may either be scattered out of the potential well by wave particle interactions or the fluctuation may be of sufficiently high amplitude that the structure of the sheath itself is altered in a time-dependent manner. In fact, ion-acoustic frequency fluctuations have been observed in both experiments [@yip:17] and simulations [@sche:15]. Although no study has yet been done that attempts to identify if the instabilities can provide sufficient ion pumping, measurements have revealed an influence on the IVDF [@yip:17], which will be discussed in the next section.
Stability
---------
The IVDF in a typical double sheath may be expected to consist of two components. One is the population entering from the plasma that is accelerated toward the electrode by the potential drop from the plasma to the minimum of the virtual cathode. After reaching the potential minimum, ions are then turned around by the larger electron sheath potential rise between this minimum and the electrode. This reflected population would be expected to create a second contribution to the IVDF associated with ions at essentially the same energy at any location, but moving in the opposite direction. Adding these two populations, the total IVDF near the dip minimum may thus be expected to consist of oppositely directed ion beams.
Yip, Hershkowitz and Severn [@yip:17] tested this hypothesis by measuring the IVDF throughout the double sheath using LIF. The results revealed a very different behavior than the above expectation. Although both incoming and reflected ion populations were observed, the energy of the incoming population was measured to be far less than what would be expected for ions freely falling through the measured potential drop from the plasma to the potential minimum. The reflected population was also low energy as well as a much lower density. Counter-streaming ion beams are expected to be unstable to the ion-ion two-stream instability, as described in section \[sec:is\_mis\]. The authors proposed that ion-ion two-stream instabilities may be responsible, and invoked the instability-enhanced friction mechanism described in section \[sec:is\_mis\] to explain the low energy difference between the counterstreaming populations.
This hypothesis was tested by carrying out a similar series of LIF measurements at a variety of electrode biases, ranging from values where the electrode potential was above to below the plasma potential. This allowed control over the density of the reflected population because some of the ions were absorbed by the electrode when the electrode potential was near the plasma potential. Since the ion-ion two-stream instability threshold depends on the relative concentration of each population, this was expected to control the energy at which the instability onsets, and hence the expected energy of the ions as they traverse the double sheath; this is analogous to the velocity locking that results from the two-stream instability in the multiple ion species case described in section \[sec:is\_mis\]. Indeed, the ion energy was observed to be fast and near the ballistic expectation when the reflected population was not present, but to be much lower than the ballistic expectation when the reflect population was present. A mapping for the expected ion energy in terms of concentration and electrode bias were provided, showing qualitative agreement with the experimental measurements.
This work provides strong evidence that ion-ion two-stream instabilities influence the IVDF in double sheaths, but several open questions remain. No direct measurement of the instability dispersion relation has yet been provided. It is also interesting to question how ion scattering by the ion-ion two-stream instabilities might influence ion trapping in the double sheath potential well. Does the presence of instabilities feedback to influence the depth of the potential well? Can this also be a source for pumping ions out of the well?
Electron emitting surfaces
--------------------------
One of the most common situations in which double sheaths arise is near electron-emitting surfaces [@hobb:67; @guer:70; @chen:11; @li:12; @schw:15a; @fang:69]. A variety of mechanisms can be responsible for electron emission, including secondary emission, photoemission or thermionic emission. Sheath structure near electron emitting surfaces is of interest in several applications such as thermionically emitting cathodes [@geke:16], discharges sustained by electron emission [@schw:15b], tokamak divertors [@komm:17; @camp:19], hypersonic vehicles [@hanq:17], spacecraft applications [@whip:81], the Moon [@popp:11], meteoroids [@sora:01], as well as surrounding dust particles in space and the laboratory [@delz:14; @autr:18]. It is particularly important for emissive probe diagnostics because the double sheath influences the interpretation of the current-voltage trace [@kemp:65; @ye:00]. Methods, such as the inflection point method [@smit:79], have been developed to improve the accuracy of emissive probe measurements associated with this effect [@shee:11]. It has also been demonstrated experimentally [@oksu:11] and studied using PIC simulations [@camp:13; @camp:15; @camp:16] that plasmas bounded by strongly emitting boundaries can be made to have a negative plasma potential with respect to the conducting boundaries. Here, double sheaths similar to that depicted in figure \[fg:NAF\_sheath\] were observed [@oksu:11], but where the bulk plasma potential was below the electrode potential. This is a very different confinement state than the typical situation of a positive plasma potential that confines electrons via an ion sheath, emphasizing that secondary emission can fundamentally reconfigure a plasma [@camp:15].
The question of a floating emitting surface was first considered by Hobbs and Wesson [@hobb:67], and has subsequently been studied by many others [@schw:93; @tier:16]. Other early work on this topic was motivated by diodes [@fang:69] and Q machines [@rynn:66], where dc double sheaths were observed and theoretically modeled near strongly emitting thermionic cathodes. In addition to dc double sheaths, Braithwaite and Allen [@brai:81] studied the rapid formation of a double sheath following a voltage step in thermally produced diode plasma. There is a rich and broad literature on double sheaths near electron emitting boundaries. The following discussion focuses on recent studies that aim to determine if a sheath near an emitting surface will be an ion sheath, double sheath or an electron sheath. In this literature, the double sheath is often referred to as a “space charge limited” (SCL) sheath, and the electron sheath as an “inverse” sheath [@sydo:09; @camp:12a].
Consider a planar conducting electrode that is electrically floating with respect to the plasma. In the absence of electron emission, the sheath surrounding the electrode is expected to be an ion sheath, with the plasma potential being the floating potential higher than the electrode potential, as described in section \[sec:structures\], and with the sheath structure described in section \[sec:is\]. If the electrode emits electrons, the potential profile and corresponding floating potential would be expected to change. Electrons emitted from the surface are accelerated by the ion sheath potential into the plasma. If the electron emission rate is sufficiently high, the emitted electron density can exceed the ion density near the electrode surface. This creates a thin region of negative space-charge near the electrode surface, forming a virtual cathode with a total sheath potential profile taking the form of a double sheath. Hobbs and Wesson [@hobb:67] were the first to propose a fluid model for how electron emission alters the floating potential. Assuming that the emitted electrons originate with negligible energy, they obtained the result $$\phi_s = - \frac{T_e}{e} \ln \biggl( \frac{1 - \Gamma}{\sqrt{2\pi m_e/m_i}} \biggr)$$ where $\Gamma$ is the ratio of emission flux to the primary electron flux reaching the electrode. This predicts that the sheath potential decreases with increased emission, and the model is expected to be limited to emission values smaller than unity. Their theory also included a model for the double sheath potential profile. These basic features of electron emitting sheaths have been modeled in a variety of kinetic theories, and showed general agreement with PIC simulations, as reviewed by Schwager [@schw:93].
Usually, the emitted electrons have a distribution of energies, which may be characterized with a temperature parameter $T_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}$. Sheehan *et al* [@shee:13; @shee:14] proposed a kinetic theory showing that the sheath potential depends on the ratio of the temperature of emitted electrons to the plasma temperature. The model predicted that the sheath potential approaches zero as this temperature ratio approaches unity. This prediction was found to agree with PIC simulation results [@shee:13], as well as measurements of the sheath surrounding a thermionically emitting cathode in the afterglow of an rf plasma [@shee:14b]. This work also included a generalization of the Bohm criterion to account for secondary electron emission (see equation (5) of [@shee:13]).
A fraction of emitted electrons overcome the potential barrier between the electrode and the minimum of the virtual cathode, and are then accelerated into the plasma. At steady-state, this results in an electron distribution function in the plasma that consists of an electron beam moving with reference to the bulk plasma electrons. If this electron beam is sufficiently dense and energetic, it can be a source of electron-electron two-stream instabilities. Such instabilities have been observed in experiments [@coak:80], studied theoretically [@moro:02] and simulated using PIC methods [@sydo:07; @camp:12b]. Secondary electron emission has been proposed as a mechanism to cause anomalous electron transport in Hall effect thrusters [@kaga:07; @sydo:08].
Sydorenko *et al* [@sydo:09] have presented results of one-dimensional PIC simulations suggesting that under conditions of intense electron emission, a steady-state space-charge limited (SCL) sheath (what we refer to as the double sheath) may not be present. Instead, they observed an oscillation between a SCL state and ion sheath state. The SCL sheath was observed to exist for a short interval of approximately 38 ns, while the non-SCL (ion) sheath existed for 154 ns. The overall oscillation between these two states was regular and on the order of MHz. These were explained as relaxation oscillations associated with a negative differential conductivity in the sheath, and subsequent trapping of a population of cold secondary emitted electrons.
Recent work by Campanell *et al* [@camp:12a] has studied boundaries with a secondary electron emission coefficient that exceeds unity, primarily using 1D PIC simulations. This work observed essentially no sheath when the electron emission coefficient was near unity, and an “inverse sheath” (what we call an electron sheath), rather than a double sheath, when the secondary electron emission coefficient significantly exceeded unity. An electron sheath potential profile reflects some fraction of the electrons emitted by the boundary. Global current balance considerations, as described in section \[sec:gc\], can be satisfied by either of these two solutions, and, in fact, both have been observed in the simulations [@camp:17]. The question naturally arises that, if two possible solutions exist, why is one “chosen” over the other? Campanell *et al* [@camp:17] have discussed the important role of ion trapping in the potential well. As discussed in section \[sec:it\], double sheaths in partially ionized plasmas require a mechanism for pumping ions trapped in the potential well if they are to be a steady-state solution. This is not possible in one-dimension, and it was suggested that for this reason the electron sheath (i.e., inverse sheath) would be observed in practice. However, as discussed in section \[sec:it\], a variety of mechanisms for ion pumping are possible in multiple dimensions, including loss to nearby surfaces or pumping of ions back to the plasma due to sheath fluctuations and instabilities. It remains a matter of further research to develop a predictive capability describing which sheath solutions will form in a given experimental configuration.
Fireballs\[sec:fb\]
===================
Anode glow
----------
When an electrode is biased above the plasma potential electrons are accelerated toward the boundary by the electric field of the electron sheath, gaining energy $e(\phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}- \phi_p)$ in passing from the plasma to the electrode. If the electrode potential is within a few volts of the plasma potential, the electron sheath can be accurately described without regard to ionization sources, as was discussed in section \[sec:es\]. In fact, since acceleration through the electron sheath nominally causes the electron density to drop, the ionization rate in the electron sheath is much less than in the bulk plasma.
{width="15cm"}
However, as the potential difference between the plasma and the electrode approaches the ionization potential of the neutral gas, the ionization cross section rapidly increases, and a larger fraction of the sheath-accelerated electrons ionize neutrals. For a large enough energy gain in the electron sheath, the ionization rate can become much higher near the electrode than in the bulk plasma. Since the ion generated in the ionization event is much more massive than the corresponding electron, it takes much longer for the sheath electric field to push the ion into the bulk plasma than it does for the electron to be lost to the electrode. The residence times are approximately $\tau_i = l_s/\sqrt{2e (\phi_{{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}} - \phi_p)/m_i}$ for ions and $\tau_e = l_s/\sqrt{2e (\phi_{{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}} - \phi_p)/m_e}$ for electrons, where $l_s$ is the length scale of the region where localized ionization is taking place (a subdomain of the electron sheath). If the ionization rate is large enough, and the ion residence time long enough, the ion density can overtake the electron density and a thin region of positive space charge forms near the electrode surface. This causes a flattening of the potential profile near the electrode surface, and the resulting potential profile is that of a double layer, as shown in figure \[fg:type\](d). Because the excitation cross section increases with electron energy, similar to the electron impact ionization cross section, this region glows brighter than the background plasma. An example is shown in figure \[fg:spot\_photo\], and is often referred to as anode glow [@lang:29; @emel:82].
Anode glow was first observed and named by Langmuir [@lang:29]. Measurements of the potential profile using emissive probes have confirmed that the electron sheath lengthens and flattens when the anode glow is present [@baal:09; @song:91]. An analytic generalization of the Child-Langmuir law of the form of equations (\[eq:cl\]) or (\[eq:cl\_e\]) has not been obtained for anode glow because the local ion density is connected with the local electron density, electron velocity and the ionization cross section. However, Conde *et al* [@cond:06] have developed a semi-analytic model for the potential and density profiles (see figure 4 of [@cond:06]) that solves an integro-differential equation numerically. This model includes the effect of electron impact ionization and shows the qualitative features of lengthening and the buildup of an ion rich layer in the sheath next to the electrode that are expected from the physical arguments above. Anode glow was also observed in the PIC simulations of [@sche:17]. These results are reproduced in the panel marked t = $9.5\mu$s in figure \[sche18fig5\]. Again, this figure shows the lengthening of the electron sheath and flattening of the potential profile that characterizes the anode glow double layer.
Fireball onset\[sec:onset\]
---------------------------
Langmuir was also the first to observe that if the electrode bias is increased further after the anode glow has formed, a critical point is eventually reached where the sheath structure bifurcates to a much larger (typically cm scale) luminous secondary discharge [@lang:29]; see figure \[fg:spot\_photo\]. This state is now often called a “fireball” [@song:91; @song:92a; @sten:11b; @sten:11f; @sten:11g; @sten:12; @levk:17], though the same phenomenon has also been referred to as an “anode spot” [@baal:09; @rube:40; @park:11; @park:14], “plasma contactor” [@ahed:96; @lapu:00], “plasma double layer” [@sand:95; @stra:99], “anode double layer” [@sand:86; @tang:03; @gurl:05], “firerod” [@an:94], or other labels [@seyh:88; @ande:95; @opre:00; @muja:11].
Langmuir and emissive probe measurements of the electrostatic potential profile [@baal:09; @song:91; @trov:80] reveal that the secondary fireball discharge is a quasineutral plasma that is separated from the bulk plasma by a strong double layer electric field, as depicted schematically in figure \[fg:type\]. Recent laser collision induced fluorescence (LCIF) measurements have also revealed that the plasma density is larger inside the fireball than in the bulk plasma [@weat:12; @sche:18]; see figure \[fg:LCIF\]. Other basic measurements of fireball properties are that the double layer potential drop is approximately the ionization potential of the neutral gas [@baal:09; @song:91], that this potential drop occurs over a few Debye lengths, and that both the diameter of the fireball and the critical bias required for onset scale approximately inversely with neutral pressure [@song:91]. Furthermore, there is hysteresis in the onset condition, whereby the critical bias required to create a fireball from the anode glow state is higher than the bias at which the fireball will transition back to the anode glow state [@baal:09; @song:91; @sand:95; @stra:99; @tang:03]. More recently, the stability properties of fireballs have been extensively investigated [@sten:11b; @sten:11f; @sten:11g; @sten:12].
{width="15cm"}
Fireball onset can be initiated by either increasing the electrode bias or neutral gas pressure beyond a critical value [@lang:29; @song:91]. Fireball formation is abrupt. Langmuir probe measurements indicate that formation occurs on a timescale of approximately $10\mu s$ in a 1 mTorr Ar plasma [@sten:08; @song:91] once a critical value of bias or pressure is surpassed. Because the fireball formation increases the effective area of the electrode for collecting electrons, formation is quickly followed by an increase of the bulk plasma potential [@sche:18]. After a short transient period, the sheath and plasma potential adjust until the double layer potential step is near the ionization potential of the neutral gas [@song:91].
A few models for fireball onset have been proposed. One of the elementary features of these models is that stationary double layers satisfy the Langmuir flux balance condition [@bloc:72; @bloc:78] $$\label{eq:lang}
\Gamma_i = \sqrt{m_e/m_i} \Gamma_e .$$ Song *et al* [@song:91] used this condition to derive a criterion, which predicts that the fireball onsets when the ion density in the high potential side of the anode glow exceeds the bulk plasma density. By balancing the ionization rate with the loss rate they predicted that the critical bias scales inversely with pressure, which was found to agree well with experiments. Reference [@sche:17] presented a slight modification of this to include the fact that sheath expansion can cause the surface area of the electron sheath associated with the anode glow to be larger than the surface area of the electrode. This leads to a slightly larger area for ion loss to the plasma than for electron loss to the electrode. The modified balance condition for the ionization and loss rates is [@sche:17] $$1-\frac{1}{2}\frac{A_{{\textrm{\scriptsize s}}}}{A_{{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}}}\sqrt{\frac{m_i}{m_e}}N\sigma z_{{\textrm{\scriptsize s}}}=0,$$ where $A_{{\textrm{\scriptsize s}}}$ is the effective area of the sheath, $N$ is the neutral density, $\sigma$ is the ionization cross section, and $z_{{\textrm{\scriptsize s}}}$ is the thickness of an electron sheath [@sche:15]. A simple cylindrical shell model was proposed for the area ratio, which assumes that the electrode is a disk: $A_{{\textrm{\scriptsize s}}}/A_{{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}} \approx 4z_{{\textrm{\scriptsize s}}}/D+1$. Since $z_{{\textrm{\scriptsize s}}}$ and $\sigma$ are a function of the sheath potential, the critical bias relative to the plasma potential can be solved numerically. The results for several different neutral pressures using two different electrode sizes are compared with experimental measurements in figure \[sche18fig11\], showing reasonable agreement [@sche:17]. From the figure, it is clear that either an increase in bias or pressure for a fixed electrode size can result in onset, in agreement with previous experiments [@song:91].
Later work [@baal:09] built upon this model, suggesting that if the quasineutral region within the anode glow becomes more than a Debye length in size, a fireball will form. This is because ions exiting the quasineutral plasma must satisfy the Bohm criterion, which requires the formation of a presheath. It was suggested that the fireball is the presheath region that accelerates ions directed toward the bulk plasma. However, this prediction is difficult to test in the laboratory because the spatial scale is so small and probes can disrupt the anode glow properties.
Recent progress has been made using 2D PIC simulations [@sche:17] and 2D LCIF measurements [@sche:18]. Simulations show that the ion density in the anode glow is substantially greater than the electron density just before onset; see the panel marked t=9.5 $\mu$s in figure \[sche18fig5\]. This was not a part of the model from [@baal:09], which assumed a quasineutral region with a flat potential adjacent to the electrode. The remaining panels of figure \[sche18fig5\] reveal the process that results in fireball formation [@sche:17]: A continued buildup of ions near the electrode surface results in the formation of a local maximum in the electrostatic potential just off of the electrode surface. This maximum is a potential well for low energy electrons born from electron impact ionization in its vicinity. As a result, some of these electrons are trapped as indicated by the arrow in the panel marked t=10.2$\mu$s. Once this occurs, the trapped electron density quickly increases leading to the formation of a quasineutral fireball plasma. The buildup of ions as a means to trap electrons born from ionization is an aspect of the fireball formation process that was revealed by PIC simulations.
Experimental validation of these simulations was provided by recent LCIF measurements [@sche:18]. Application of LCIF has considerably advanced understanding of fireballs because it provides a non-invasive (optical) and well-resolved measurement of electric field, electron density and electron temperature. A simulation of an experiment studying fireball onset and stabilization in a 100 mTorr helium discharge was found to show agreement with the measured electric field and density profiles, as well as the onset dynamics [@sche:18]; see figure \[fg:LCIF\]. This provided evidence confirming the importance of the establishment of a potential well for electrons in the anode glow region prior to onset. PIC simulations also revealed that the dynamics of onset can depend on how rapidly the electrode bias is increased through the critical value. If the voltage is ramped quickly (as a step function) the initial fireball expansion quickly pushes a burst of ions into the plasma, but then subsequently collapses, before turning on again and settling to a steady state after a few microseconds. This “flickering” is not observed if the electrode bias is ramped at the same timescale as it takes for the fireball to form (a few microseconds). In addition to the electric field and density measurements shown in figure \[fg:LCIF\], LCIF measurements have also shown that the electron temperature inside the fireball is not significantly different than in the bulk plasma [@weat:12].
![A comparison of predictions for the critical bias and experimental measurements as a function of pressure for two different electrode sizes. Figure reprinted from reference [@sche:17]. \[sche18fig11\] ](figure30.pdf){width="8cm"}
Steady-state properties
-----------------------
### Fireball-electrode sheath structure
Fireballs have been observed with different sheath potential structures separating the fireball plasma from the electrode [@baal:09; @song:91; @trov:80; @sche:18]. Cases with an ion sheath, electron sheath, and double sheath have all been observed; see fig \[trov80fig2\]. This sheath structure can be understood using the same current balance arguments as section \[sec:gc\] [@sche:17], but applied to the fireball discharge. In this case, the wall area of the chamber $A_{{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}}$ is replaced by the surface area of the fireball $A_{{\textrm{\scriptsize F}}}$. The same principle applies because the fireball itself is a steady-state quasineutral plasma.
![\[trov80fig2\] Example measurements of the potential profile in a fireball showing three different possibilities for the sheath between the fireball and the electrode: (top) ion sheath, (middle) electron sheath, (bottom) double sheath. Figures reprinted from references [@song:91], [@baal:09] and [@trov:80], respectively. ](figure31a.pdf "fig:"){width="6cm"}\
![\[trov80fig2\] Example measurements of the potential profile in a fireball showing three different possibilities for the sheath between the fireball and the electrode: (top) ion sheath, (middle) electron sheath, (bottom) double sheath. Figures reprinted from references [@song:91], [@baal:09] and [@trov:80], respectively. ](figure31b.pdf "fig:"){width="6cm"}\
![\[trov80fig2\] Example measurements of the potential profile in a fireball showing three different possibilities for the sheath between the fireball and the electrode: (top) ion sheath, (middle) electron sheath, (bottom) double sheath. Figures reprinted from references [@song:91], [@baal:09] and [@trov:80], respectively. ](figure31c.png "fig:"){width="7cm"}
First, consider the case where the sheath between the electrode and fireball plasma is an ion sheath. Ion loss in this situation occurs both through the double layer surface and to the electrode with ions traveling at their sound speed at the plasma boundaries which is determined in part by the electron temperature of the total electron distribution. Due to the magnitude of the double layer potential, electrons are only lost to the electrode at a rate given by the random flux of the trapped electron distribution multiplied by the Boltzmann density reduction factor associated with the sheath potential. The balance of currents results in an area-ratio condition, analogous to equation (\[eq:A\_is\]), describing when an ion sheath is present [@sche:17] $$\label{a6}
\frac{A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}}{A_{\textrm{\scriptsize F}}} > \biggl( \frac{0.6 \sqrt{T_{eI}/T_e}}{\mu} - 1 \biggr)^{-1} \approx 1.7 \sqrt{\frac{T_{eI}}{T_e}} \mu .
$$ Here, $T_{eI}$ is the temperature of the trapped electron population born from ionization and $T_{e}$ is the total electron temperature. Analogous to section \[sec:gc\], if $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}/A_{\textrm{\scriptsize F}}$ is sufficiently small, the fireball potential is expected to be less than the electrode potential and a corresponding electron sheath to be present. In this situation, electrons are lost to the electrode at the electron thermal speed and ions are lost through the fireball surface at the sound speed. Assuming a constant electron density leads to a condition analogous to equation (\[eq:A\_es\]) for an electron sheath [@sche:17] $$\label{a3}
\frac{A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}}{A_{\textrm{\scriptsize F}}} < \frac{\mu}{\alpha_e}
$$ When the area ratio falls between the range of equations (\[a6\]) and (\[a3\]), a double sheath is expected.
Evaluating equations (\[a6\]) and (\[a3\]) requires a model for the effective surface area of the fireball. In general, this can be complicated by different possibilities for the geometry. In the most common case of a sphere, accurate models have been developed that relate the diameter of the sphere to the neutral gas pressure, ionization cross section, electron-to-ion mass ratio and the double layer and sheath potential steps. An example will be described in the next subsection, leading to equation (\[D2\]). Calculations of equations (\[a6\]) and (\[a3\]) using equation (\[D2\]) to model $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize F}}$ were found to predict area ratio criteria that are consistent with available experimental measurements of each sheath structure, such as the electron, ion and double sheath shown in figure \[trov80fig2\] [@sche:17].
### Size\[sec:size\]
The first model of the fireball diameter [@song:91] combined the Langmuir condition from equation (\[eq:lang\]) with the requirement that the rate of ion production within the fireball must equal the rate of ion loss into the bulk plasma. The latter condition was modeled by treating the fireball as a complete sphere, and assuming the contribution of the electrode surface is negligible, leading to [@song:91] $$\label{eq:gamma_i}
\Gamma_e D \sigma_i N = \Gamma_i$$ where $D$ is the diameter, $N$ is the neutral gas number density, and $\sigma_i$ is the electron impact ionization cross section. Combining these provides a prediction for the fireball diameter $$\label{D1}
D \approx \frac{1}{N \sigma_i} \sqrt{\frac{m_e}{m_i}}.$$ Several experiments have made note of the fact that the double layer potential is only a few volts above the ionization threshold [@baal:09; @song:91]. Based on this observation, Song *et al* [@song:91] argued that the cross section should be evaluated at 2V above the ionization threshold and made predictions for the fireball size based on this assumption. Comparing these predictions to experiments in Ar, Kr, and Xe plasmas, they were able to verify the $D\propto 1/N$ scaling of equation (\[D1\]).
![\[sche:17:fig13\] The fireball diameter from equation (\[D1\]) with the cross section $\sigma_i$ evaluated at the energy an electron would gain in a double layer of potential $\Delta\phi_{{\textrm{\scriptsize DL}}}$ for neutral helium at 50, 100, and 200 mTorr. The energy dependence of the electron impact ionization cross section of He is also shown. Figure reprinted from reference [@sche:17]. ](figure32.pdf){width="8cm"}
A later estimate of the fireball size was presented in Ref. [@baal:09] using flux balance arguments without invoking the Langmuir condition. Balancing the ionization rate with the flux of ions leaving the fireball in a 1D Cartesian model, and assuming equality between the beam electron density and fireball ion density, the length scale was estimated to be $$\label{D2}
L = \frac{1}{N\sigma_i}\sqrt{\frac{m_e}{m_i}}\sqrt{\frac{\Delta\phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize s}}}{2\Delta\phi_{{\textrm{\scriptsize DL}}}}},$$ where $\Delta \phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize s}}$ is the potential of the ion presheath within the fireball at the high potential side of the double layer and $\Delta\phi_{{\textrm{\scriptsize DL}}}$ is the double layer potential through which electrons are accelerated. The length estimate of equation (\[D2\]) reproduces the previously observed scaling of $L\propto 1/N$. The numerical estimates for the fireball size produced values which were within a factor of 2 of those measured in experiments [@baal:09].
Later work elaborated on the sensitivity of the fireball diameter to the energy at which the cross section is evaluated [@sche:17]. This feature is demonstrated in figure \[sche:17:fig13\] which shows the predicted size in a helium plasma from equation (\[D1\]) as a function of electron energy gained by the double layer potential. If the double layer potential is taken to be infinitesimally close to the electron impact ionization threshold energy the predicted fireball size tends to infinity. To provide an additional constraint on the evaluation of the cross section, the double layer potential was determined by imposing a power balance relation within the fireball. This predicts that the double layer potential is [@sche:17] $$e\Delta\phi_{DL}=\mathcal{E}_{i}+\mathcal{O}(T_e),$$ where $\mathcal{E}_{i}$ is the ionization energy of the neutral gas and $\mathcal{O}(T_e)$ is a term on the order of the electron temperature, the form of which depends on the fireball potential structure. This result is consistent with the earlier assumptions of Ref. [@song:91] when the electron temperature is 1-2eV, as is typical in many fireballs.
![\[sche19fig2\] (a) Photograph of a fireball and (b) the intensity threshold used to determine the fireball size. Fireball diameter as a function of (c) electrode bias and (d) plasma potential. The dashed line in (d) shows the scaling of $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize F}}$ as a function of plasma potential. Note that “Eq. (5)” in the legend refers to equation (\[eq:phi\_f\]) of this review. Figure reprinted from reference [@sche:19]. ](figure33.pdf){width="8.5cm"}
Fireball size is not always tied to particle balance within the fireball itself. Instead, global particle balance arguments can also contribute. Recent experiments inferred the fireball size as a function of electrode bias by taking the intensity threshold of a photograph, as shown in figure \[sche19fig2\] [@sche:19]. With a fireball present, both the plasma potential and fireball surface area were observed to increase with increasing electrode bias (figures \[sche19fig2\]c and d). Because the surface area of the fireball acts as the effective surface area for collecting electrons, it also determines the effective size of the electrode for a global current balance of the type described in section \[sec:gc\]. The plasma potential can be estimated using equation (\[eq:Vp\_es\]), but where the electrode area $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize E}}$ is replaced by the effective fireball area $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize F}}$ $$\label{eq:phi_f}
\phi_p=-(T_e/e)\ln(\mu-A_{{\textrm{\scriptsize F}}}/A_{{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}}).$$ Figure \[sche19fig2\]d shows that the scaling relationship between the plasma potential and the fireball diameter $D \propto \sqrt{A_{\textrm{\scriptsize F}}}$ predicted by equation (\[eq:phi\_f\]) agrees well with the measurements. When the fireball becomes large enough, a state of global nonambipolar flow can be established whereby electrons are only collected by the fireball surface area and ions are only collected by the chamber wall. This sets a maximum fireball size. In this global nonambipolar flow state, the plasma potential is locked to the electrode potential, as in figure \[fg:Vp\_NAF\], but shifted by the double layer potential drop $e\Delta\phi_{{\textrm{\scriptsize DL}}}\approx\mathcal{E}_{i}$; as shown in figure \[fg:F\_GNF\].
![\[fg:F\_GNF\] Measured bulk plasma potential versus increasing (squares) and decreasing (circles) electrode bias. The solid line indicates an electrode bias equal to the plasma potential and the dash-dotted line shows the same line shifted by the ionization potential of argon. Figure reprinted from reference [@baal:09]. ](figure34.pdf){width="7.5cm"}
### Multiple fireballs
If the fireball size, as predicted from equation (\[D2\]), is sufficiently large compared to the electrode surface area, the sheath between the fireball and electrode is expected to be an electron sheath, as predicted in equation (\[a3\]). If the confinement chamber is also sufficiently large that the formation of the double layer does not raise the plasma potential enough to onset global nonambipolar flow, then the potential difference between the plasma and the confinement chamber wall is set to a fixed to a value determined by equation (\[eq:phi\_f\]). Since the double layer potential drop is fixed to the ionization potential of the neutral gas, in this state further increases in the electrode bias will increase the potential difference between the electrode and the fireball; i.e., the electron sheath.
When the electron sheath between the fireball and electrode reaches the ionization potential of the neutral gas, a second fireball would be predicted to form by the same mechanism as described in section \[sec:onset\]. Indeed, such multiple fireball formation has been observed [@cond:94; @neru:98; @cond:99; @aflo:05; @ivan:05; @dimi:07; @dimi:13; @dimi:15; @gurl:14; @alex:17; @alex:17b; @alex:18; @paul:19]. These usually take the form of concentric spheres or hemispheres, as shown in figure \[dim13fig1\] [@cond:94; @cond:99; @aflo:05]. In this case, the radial electrostatic potential profile is stair-cased with each step consisting of a double layer with potential drop approximately equal to the ionization potential of the neutral gas; for example see figure \[fg:mdl\]. Several concentric fireballs appear to be possible. Limiting factors to the maximum number of concentric fireballs might be that the fireball becomes big enough that global nonambipolar flow onsets, which locks the plasma potential to the electrode potential and prevents further fireball formation, or, perhaps, that the neutral concentration gets depleted by a plasma density so high that there is no longer enough neutrals to create another more dense fireball.
![\[dim13fig1\] Photographs of concentric fireballs in (a) stable and (b) unstable states. Figure reprinted from reference [@dimi:13].](figure35.pdf){width="8.5cm"}
Multiple fireballs are not always concentric. Side-by-side fireballs have been observed on large electrodes [@dimi:07], and even a series of several fireballs have been observed on asymmetric electrodes [@ivan:05]. Electrodes with two conducting sides will sometimes have a fireball on each side. Levko [@levk:17] has made 2D PIC simulations of multiple fireballs in a hollow cathode configuration, where one was observed to form inside the cathode and one outside. He attribute the formation of each to different mechanisms, related to the presence of electron emission from the boundaries of the hollow cathode. Clearly the formation mechanisms for multiple fireballs are complex.
Fireballs can also be generated on multiple electrodes inside of a single background plasma. For example, Dimitriu *et al* [@dimi:15] studied the interaction of two fireballs generated on separate electrodes that were moved to be in proximity to one another. They observed a complex interplay between the fireballs, measuring current oscillations in few to tens of kHz frequency range, with the frequency observed to peak at a fixed distance of a few cm between the fireballs. This was modeled using an application of the scale relativity theory, and chaotic aspects of the oscillations were also observed.
![\[fg:mdl\] Langmuir probe measurement of the plasma potential through a multiple double layer. Figure reprinted from reference [@cond:94].](figure36.pdf){width="8.5cm"}
### Geometry
Fireballs are not always spherical. While spherical fireballs are common, a variety of geometries have been observed (figure \[sten08fig2\]) both with and without the presence of a magnetic field. Near a spherical electrode in an unmagnetized plasma, Stenzel *et al* [@sten:08] observed fireball states to include both a sphere that uniformly surrounds the electrode, as in figure \[sten08fig2\]a, as well as states where the fireball is found on only one side, or portion, of the electrode, as shown in figure \[sten08fig2\]b [@sten:08]. Cylindrical fireballs, commonly called “firerods,” such as those in figure \[sten08fig2\]c have been observed in magnetized plasmas [@an:94], but they have also been observed in the absence of an applied field [@sten:08; @baal:09]. Firerod formation in the absence of an applied magnetic field was observed near large electrodes and was attributed to the formation of double sheaths on regions of the electrode surface surrounding the firerod [@baal:09]. Presence of the double sheath was suggested to be necessary to limit the effective size of the electrode for current collection, because with the fireball formation the effective size would be too large to meet the global current balance requirements described in section \[sec:gc\]. The double sheaths reduce the effective collecting area, and also have the effect of constraining the fireball’s radial dimension so that it has a cylindrical shape [@baal:09].
The observations of the transition from fireball to firerod with increasing magnetic field [@an:94] may be related to the dynamical motion of electrons being constrained to within a gyroradius of magnetic field lines, but it also may be influenced by changes to the global current balance of the system. The magnetic field reduces the ion loss rate to the chamber walls, resulting in the necessity of double sheaths on regions of the electrode surface in order to maintain global current balance. Pear shaped fireballs, such as those in figure \[sten08fig2\]d and other more complicated structures have been observed in dipole and other more complicated field geometries [@sten:12; @sten:08]. Magnetic fields can be used to shape fireballs.
Stenzel *et al* [@sten:11f; @sten:11g] have also investigated an “inverted fireball” configuration where a spherical high density plasma is generated inside of a wire grid formed into a sphere. This has some similar properties to fireballs on the surface of electrodes, such as being produced by increased ionization due to energetic electrons and having a double layer electric field, but it is also particular to the transparent anode grid geometry.
![\[sten08fig2\] Photographs of a variety of sheath and fireball geometries present at electrodes. (a) an anode glow prior to the formation of a fireball. (b) A spherical fireball. (c) A cylindrical fireball or firerod. (d) A pear shaped fireball in a dipole magnetic field. Figure reprinted from reference [@sten:08].](figure37.pdf){width="8cm"}
Hysteresis
----------
One of the most frequently observed features of fireballs is the hysteresis in the current voltage (I-V) characteristic of the electrode bias such as that shown in figure \[baal09fig6\] [@baal:09; @cart:87; @song:91; @sche:19]. Prior to the formation of a fireball, the electrode initially has an electron sheath present and is collecting the electron saturation current. As the electrode bias increases past a critical bias a fireball abruptly forms, accompanied by a large increase in electron current collected by the electrode.
![\[baal09fig6\] Current voltage hysteresis between the upswing and downswing of the electrode bias. Figure reprinted from reference [@baal:09].](figure38.png){width="8cm"}
This hysteresis can be understood as follows [@sche:19]: Initially, the electrode bias must exceed the plasma potential by a critical value for fireball onset as described in section \[sec:onset\]. After the fireball is present, the electron current collected by the electrode is significantly greater, owing to the greater electron collection surface area. Immediately after formation, the fireball surface area expands, raising the plasma potential. If the expanded fireball is large enough, global nonambipolar flow onsets and the plasma potential becomes locked to a fixed offset of the electrode bias, the offset being determined by the double layer potential drop $e\Delta\phi_{{\textrm{\scriptsize DL}}}\approx\mathcal{E}_i$; see figure \[fg:F\_GNF\]. Subsequent lowering of the electrode bias results in a lower plasma potential. The lower plasma potential allows more electrons to be lost to the chamber walls. Global current balance requires that the electron collecting surface area of the fireball must be reduced to compensate. This results in a contraction of the fireball. Eventually, at a sufficiently low bias, the fireball collapses when the plasma potential is unable to decrease beyond a minimum value set by the global current balance condition, equation (\[eq:phi\_f\]), which depends on the area ratio $A_{\textrm{\scriptsize F}}/A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}$. Often times, this is simply when the plasma potential approaches a few volts above the wall potential, so the electrode critical bias for collapse is a few volts above the ionization potential of the neutral gas, as in figure \[baal09fig6\].
Hysteresis has also been observed in current as a function of other quantities including neutral pressure [@song:91], electron temperature [@baal:09], plasma potential [@baal:09] and magnetic field strength [@an:94]. In general, the threshold values of these quantities needed for onset are larger than those needed to sustain the fireball.
Stability
---------
### Macroscopic Instability
Stenzel *et al* [@sten:08; @sten:11b; @sten:11f; @sten:11g; @sten:12; @sten:11c; @sten:11d; @sten:12c] and others [@chir:07; @cond:04] have carried out a series of investigations describing the complex stability properties of fireballs over a wide range of conditions and configurations. Fireballs have been observed in macroscopically stable (MS) and macroscopically unstable (MU) states. In the MS state, the fireball remains fixed to the electrode with little change in current collection or brightness. In the MU state the fireball forms and extinguishes as indicated by a periodic increase and decrease of electron current collection and light emission, as shown in figure \[sten08fig3\]. This work emphasizes the ways in which fireballs are not a local phenomenon, but are an integral part of the entire discharge. Specifically, macroscopic stability properties can be influenced not just by local ionization or plasma drifts within the fireball, but also global current and power balance requirements as well as external circuit interactions. Typical oscillation periods for the MU fireball are on the order of $\sim20-100$ $\mu s$ [@sten:08; @song:91]. The oscillation period of the MU state has been observed to depend on the electrode voltage and current, discharge voltage and current, neutral gas species and pressure, and pulse length and repetition rate for fireballs formed in afterglow plasmas [@sten:08].
Stenzel *et al* [@sten:12c] describe the process as follows: When ions are expelled from the electrode faster than they can be created by ionization, the fireball collapses. This leads to electron drifts exceeding the thermal velocity. After collapse, the plasma density decreases causing the sheath to again expand. Ionization in the sheath triggers the grown of a new fireball. Under certain plasma conditions, this processes repeats. This sequence is similar to the “flickering” phenomenon observed in experiments and simulations of pulsed electrodes [@sche:18], described in section \[sec:onset\].
Yip and Hershkowitz [@yip:13] presented a model for the oscillation period based on a rate equation for electron generation and loss. The model was able to describe the qualitative features of their experiment, where fireballs formed near a biased wire array. It has not been tested in other experimental arrangements. Stenzel *et al* [@sten:08] have suggested that the instability may be due to limitations on the amount of current that can be drawn from the plasma. Likewise, it has been suggested that instability results from an incompatibility between the electron loss through the fireball surface area after onset and the electrode-to-wall area ratio needed to balance of global current loss with a positive electrode [@sche:19]. The cause of instability is likely more complicated as experiments have measured disconnected regions of instability in the electrode bias-neutral pressure phase space [@yip:13].
![\[sten08fig3\] The time dependence of fireball light emission and electrode current for the macroscopically unstable fireball. The coincidence of the emission and current collection suggest that the peaks and troughs are coincident with fireball formation and collapse. Figure reprinted from reference [@sten:08].](figure39.png){width="8cm"}
The potential structure and density of the fireball has been studied during its formation and collapse in the MU state [@sten:08; @song:91; @sten:12]. In Ref. [@song:91], a Langmuir probe was used to measure the plasma potential profile at different locations during fireball formation and collapse. In both cases, the period of formation and collapse in 1 mTorr of argon were approximately $10-20~\mu s$. This was comparable to the ionization time of 5 $\mu s$ estimated using $$t_{\scriptsize \textrm{ionize}} \approx \frac{1}{N\sigma_i \sqrt{2e\Delta\phi_{{\textrm{\scriptsize DL}}}/m_e}}.$$ Further measurements in Ref. [@sten:08] found a consistent conclusion. By measuring radial profiles of the electron saturation current 0.5 cm from the electrode surface, as shown in figure \[sten08fig6\], changes in density were inferred via the relation $I_{e, \scriptsize \textrm{sat}}\propto n_e\sqrt{T_e}$. Figure \[sten08fig6\] demonstrates that the fireball formation initiates at the center of the fireball and likewise the fireball collapse initiates at the same location. A depletion of the measured saturation current indicates a loss of the highest energy electrons at the center of the fireball and a decrease of density due to a reduction of the ionization rate. PIC simulations of transient behavior after the application of a stepped electrode bias suggest that the fireball collapse may be due to a raise in the bulk plasma potential, reducing the double layer potential and thus the ionization rate [@sche:18]. An experimental study of fireballs in a hollow cathode geometry reached a similar conclusion that the double layer potential is associated with the MU fireball collapse [@park:14]. This study concluded that stability could be obtained by increasing ionization within the bulk plasma to compensate for electron loss through the fireball. Such observations are consistent with the suggestion that instability is related to limits on the amount of electron current which can be drawn from the plasma.
![\[sten08fig6\] Radial profiles of the measured electron saturation current ($\propto n_e\sqrt{T_e}$) at multiple times in the MU fireball during (a) onset and (b) collapse. Measurements indicate a density hole coincides with the collapse. Figure reprinted from reference [@sten:08]. ](figure40.png){width="7.5cm"}
### Electron frequency instabilities
Microscopic instabilities have also been observed. High frequency instabilities near the electron plasma frequency have been associated with the presence of the fireball and have been attributed to the beam plasma instability [@trov:80], which is commonly found on the upstream side of a double layer due to the accelerated electron beam interacting with the trapped electron population on the high potential side. The beam-plasma instability has been observed in both MU and MS fireballs.
The sheath-plasma resonance instability [@sten:88] is another type of high-frequency instability in the range of the electron plasma frequency that has been observed after fireball collapse in the MU state [@sten:11b; @sten:11c; @sten:11d]. While this instability is not intrinsic to the fireball, it results from the presence of an electron sheath after collapse. This instability is associated with a variety of nonlinear behaviors such as amplitude clipping of the collected electron current and bursty transient behavior as indicated by the fluctuations in electrode current. A high frequency transit time instability has also been extensively studied in inverted fireballs which are present on the interior of large gridded spherical electrodes [@sten:11f; @sten:11g; @sten:12c]. The instability frequency in such cases is related to the electron transit time across the fireball.
### Ion frequency instabilities
Instabilities in the ion-plasma frequency range have been observed at the low potential side of the double layer in PIC simulations [@sche:17]. The low potential side of the fireball appears electrically much like an electron sheath to the electrons and ions. As discussed section \[sec:es\], electrons flow into an electron sheath at a speed near their thermal speed. At the same time, ions enter the plasma from the fireball with an energy of at least the double layer potential energy $V_i \geq \sqrt{2e\Delta \phi_{\textrm{\scriptsize DL}}/m_i}$. This creates a large differential flow between electrons and thermal ions that can excite electron-ion two-stream instabilities in the ion-acoustic instability branch [@sche:15]; see section \[sec:es\_lf\]. In addition, the relative drift between the ions emitted from fireball and plasma ions may excite ion-ion two-stream instabilities. Ion-ion two-stream instabilities are typically predicted to have a larger growth rate than ion-acoustic instabilities. In fact, simulations indicate that the strength of fluctuations at the low potential side is greater when a fireball is present than for an electron sheath [@sche:17].
Fireballs in magnetized plasmas\[sec:fb\_mag\]
----------------------------------------------
It has long been observed that even relatively weak magnetic fields can influence fireballs [@sten:12; @tang:03; @trov:80; @alpo:86; @song:92b; @sten:11a; @chau:16a; @chau:16b; @rane:18]. Magnetic fields as low as 10’s of Gauss can be used to shape fireballs, as shown in figure \[sten08fig2\]. Many magnetic field configurations have been explored, including uniform [@an:94], diverging [@cart:87; @song:92a; @alpo:86], mirror [@sten:12] and cusp [@sten:12] geometries. Some of the early work on magnetized fireballs was motivated by creating a laboratory experiment to study double layers observed in space environments, such as the magnetosphere [@kell:84]. Such double layers are thought to contribute to particle acceleration near magnetic cusps, which may be a source of auroral generation [@shaw:78].
Alport *et al* [@alpo:86] provided a detailed potential map of the double layer electric field of a firerod in the presence of an inhomogeneous magnetic field. They also showed that both ion and electron cyclotron instabilities are excited by the firerod, which likely represent the magnetized plasma analogs of the ion and electron frequency instabilities discussed in the previous two subsections. Stenzel *et al* [@sten:10; @sten:12; @sten:11a] has also extended the stability analysis and experiments described in the previous subsection to magnetized plasmas. One distinguishing feature of magnetization is the observation of high-frequency waves excited by the ${\mathbf}{E}\times {\mathbf}{B}$ drift of the electrons, which generate toroidal eigenmodes [@sten:10].
Song *et al* [@song:92b] showed that the diverging nature of the magnetic field can stabilize the position of the firerod. This work also provided a modified model for fireball onset that includes the effect of ion reflection by the magnetic field gradient due to the magnetic mirror force. This model is similar to that discussed in section \[sec:size\], but where equation (\[eq:gamma\_i\]) is replaced by $$\varepsilon N \sigma_i z_D \Gamma_e = \Gamma_i$$ where $z_D$ is the length scale of the firerod in the magnetic field direction (which replaces the diameter $D$ of an unmagnetized fireball) and $\varepsilon$ is the fraction of ions transmitted through the magnetic mirror. This model was successfully able to predict the position of the double layer (i.e., size of the firerod) in the inhomogenous magnetic field.
Later work by An *et al* [@an:94] developed a model for the steady-state properties of firerods in a uniform magnetic field and tested it experimentally. This work considered a positively biased disk shaped electrode with a surface normal to a uniform magnetic field. It showed that the minimum magnetic field strength for a fireball to transition to a firerod is associated with the condition that ions be weakly magnetized. Defining $K \sim \omega_{ci}/\nu_{\textrm{\scriptsize in}}$ as the ratio of the ion cyclotron frequency and the ion-neutral collision frequency, and using $\nu_{\textrm{\scriptsize in}} = N\sigma_i v_{Ti}$, this relationship can be expressed as $$B = \frac{K}{e} (m_i k_B T_i)^{1/2} \sigma_i N$$ where $K$ is a number of order 1. This predicts that the minimum magnetic field strength required for a firerod to onset is proportional to the neutral pressure, which was found to agree well with experiments [@an:94].
A model was also developed for the firerod length [@an:94]. This is similar to that presented in section \[sec:size\], but is complicated by the fact that particles can escape the double layer both through end and sides of the cylinder and that motion of electrons and ions in the direction perpendicular to the magnetic field is suppressed by the magnetic field. Nevertheless, a relatively simple model was proposed (see equations (5)–(7) of [@an:94]) that reproduced at least the qualitative features of the measurements. Finally, this work also mapped out a stabilty diagram in terms of pressure and magnetic field strength which showed that there is also a maximum magnetic field strength beyond which the firerod can no longer be maintained. A stronger magnetic field will suppress radial diffusion of electrons and ions, making the geometry more and more one-dimensional with increasing field strength. In lieu of the global current balance conditions described above, it may be that the strong magnetization prevents the possibility of firerod formation because it effectively reduces the chamber wall area for collecting ions ($A_{\textrm{\scriptsize w}}$), which may imply that the a larger effective electrode size generated by a fireball is too large to preserve the global current balance requirement. Further experiments would be required to test this suggestion.
Connections with Related Topics\[sec:con\]
==========================================
This review has focused on dc biased electrodes in low-pressure discharges with simple geometric configurations, such as that depicted in figure \[fg:electrode\], because it provides a simple demonstration of physical processes associated with sheaths near biased electrodes. However, many plasma discharges of practical interest are more complicated. These complexities can change some of the expectations from the above discussion in fundamental ways. Additionally, some of the concepts related to sheaths near biased electrodes may be applicable to understanding other phenomena, but the connection is not always obvious. Here we briefly mention four particularly relevant example topics: high pressure plasmas, magnetized plasmas, rf capacitively coupled discharges and electronegative plasmas.
Anode and cathode spots in high pressure plasmas
-------------------------------------------------
Anode and cathode spots and patterns have long been a fascinating research topic in gas discharge physics [@beni:88; @alme:10; @trel:16]. These are localized regions of luminous plasma that can take different shapes and form patterns near electrode surfaces. They have been observed in a variety of discharge types, including dc glow discharges [@verr:09; @shir:14], arc discharges [@trel:14], magnetrons [@yang:15], dielectric barrier discharges [@abol:11; @call:14; @boeu:12; @bran:17; @likh:07], and microdischarges [@scho:04]. Electrode boundaries supporting such spots can be either solid or liquid [@verr:09; @shir:14]. Often times these are associated with discharges operating near atmospheric pressure conditions. Modeling the patterns that form is an active research topic regarding the mathematical description of bistable nonlinear dissipative systems [@beni:14; @bien:18], as well as computational physics [@trel:16].
On one hand, anode spots appear to be similar to the fireballs in low-pressure plasmas (which are sometimes also called anode spots) that were discussed in section \[sec:fb\]. Both are related to self-organized, highly-luminous and localized secondary discharges that form near biased electrodes in plasmas. Indeed, the experimental setups are similar enough that it may be expected that fireballs would form at low pressure and spots at high pressure in the same apparatus. This, perhaps, may lead one to expect that the underlying physical mechanisms are similar.
On the other hand, the theoretical descriptions for each of these phenomena, as currently understood, are quite distinct. The model for fireballs described in section \[sec:fb\] is based on increased ionization in a localized region that bifurcates to a fireball to preserve the flux balance condition associated with a double layer potential step separating the spot discharge from the bulk plasma. Thus, fundamental features of these fireballs include a space-charge-limited double-layer electric field and a quasineutral interior region. Kinetic effects (i.e., effects associated with details of the velocity distribution functions beyond what is described in a fluid or thermodynamics model) are important to this description. In contrast, spots in high pressure discharges appear to be well described by fluid models, such as systems of reaction-diffusion or drift-diffusion descriptions [@trel:16]. Here, the physical mechanism responsible for spot formation is a thermal instability that is coupled with the boundary condition of the electrode temperature (a parameter completely absent from the low-pressure fireball description). Because collisions between charged particles and neutrals are so frequent at high pressure, space-charge-limited electric fields, such as the double layers of low-pressure fireballs, are rarely observed. Furthermore, anode spots are often observed in complex patterns at distinct locations on the electrode, which interact with one another, whereas fireballs are typically of the electrode size or larger and have either a single fireball, or concentric (nested), structure. The linear stability of the reaction-diffusion models for pattern formation in high-pressure spots has been accurately described using the Turing parameters characteristic of an activator-inhibitor system [@trel:16; @rumb:19].
Despite these differences, interesting questions remain regarding the relationship between these two phenomena. The similarity of the experiments suggests that there must be a pressure range over which the low-pressure fireball transitions to a high-pressure anode spot. What pressure characterizes this transition? How does the space-charge limited double-sheath transition to the anode spot of a fluid description? When does the temperature of the boundary begin to be important? How does the large-scale fireball shrink to a pattern of anode spots? Does this transition occur gradually or abruptly?
Cathode spots are a related high pressure (100s of Torr) self-organization phenomenon that have been observed in microdischarges; see figure \[Cspot\_fig\]. Their formation depends on the magnitude of the current collected (or the electrode bias) and the neutral gas pressure. Experiments reported in [@scho:04] showed that varying the pressure and electrode current resulted in the formation of bright discharge-like features on the cathode, with varying degrees of azimuthal symmetry. Computational models of cathode spots based on two-fluid diffusion equations have reproduced the patterns observed in experiments, including the azimuthal symmetry [@bien:16]. An analogous set of questions to that in the previous paragraph may be asked regarding how a cathode sheath that is well understood by the models described in section \[sec:is\] transitions to a complex spot structure at high pressure.
![\[Cspot\_fig\] A variety of cathode spot patterns have been observed at different currents and pressures. Figure reprinted from reference [@scho:04]](figure41.png){width="8cm"}
Magnetized Plasmas
------------------
This review focuses on unmagnetized plasmas, but many plasmas of interest are magnetized. Magnetization is known to fundamentally change the plasma-boundary interaction region. For instance, the canonical model of ion sheaths proposed by Chodura [@chod:82] includes a “magnetic presheath” region characterized by the length scale $$\label{eq:dm}
d_m = \sqrt{6} (c_s/\omega_{ci}) \sin \psi$$ where $\omega_{ci} = q_iB/m_i$ is the ion cyclotron frequency [@chod:82], and $\psi$ is the angle between the magnetic field and the normal direction to the boundary. In this model, the plasma boundary transition can be considered to consist of three layers: collisional presheath, magnetic presheath, and Debye sheath. Here, the ion velocity parallel to the magnetic field reaches the sound speed ($v_\parallel = c_s$) at the boundary between collisional presheath and magnetic presheath, while the ion velocity normal to the boundary surface reaches the sound speed ($v_n = c_s$) at the boundary between the magnetic presheath and the Debye sheath [@riem:94; @stan:95]. Several extensions and modifications of the Chodura model have been proposed [@riem:94; @stan:95; @holl:93; @hutc:96; @ahed:97; @beil:98; @gera:17; @gera:18; @gera:19]. Much of the motivation, and experimental work, on magnetized sheaths stems from its importance to magnetic fusion energy experiments [@stan:84; @stan:00; @chun:89]. There have also been a number of computational studies of the magnetic plasma-boundary transition, including particle trajectory simulations [@dewa:87; @cohe:98], PIC simulations [@chod:82; @tskh:04; @khaz:15; @daub:98], fluid-Monte Carlo simulations [@khaz:15], gyrokinetic simulations [@gera:18] and Vlasov simulations [@deva:06; @coul:16].
Kim *et al* [@kim:95] measured equipotential contours in a magnetized sheath and presheath in a low temperature plasma; see also [@sing:02]. These results agreed with qualitative features of Chodura’s model, including the presence of both a collisional presheath and a magnetic presheath. Furthermore, the magnetic presheath thickness was measured to be approximately that predicted in equation (\[eq:dm\]), but where the $\sqrt{6}$ factor is replaced by unity. The shorter presheath may be due to the influence of ion-neutral collisions, as explained by Riemann’s model [@riem:94]. The collisional magnetic presheath was found to have an approximately $T_e/(2e)$ potential drop when $\psi \leq 40^\circ$. Equipotential contours were found to be parallel to the boundary in the collisional presheath, but not in the magnetic presheath.
Recent experiments have employed LIF to measure the IVDF and associated ion flow profiles in 3D [@sidd:14; @sidd:16]. Ion-neutral collisions were found to be an important aspect of the presheath in these low temperature discharges, showing a breakdown of Chodura’s model and the importance of effects described by Riemann [@riem:94] and Ahedo [@ahed:97]. Specifically, this work revealed that significant ${\mathbf}{E}\times {\mathbf}{B}$ drifts are generated, in which the ion flow has a component parallel to the boundary surface that is a significant fraction of the ion-acoustic speed. Models incorporating such drifts have been developed by Riemann [@riem:94] and Stangeby [@stan:95]. The experimental work also demonstrated that the ${\mathbf}{E}\times {\mathbf}{B}$ drifts are generated far from the boundary, due to the presheath electric field, and that charge exchange in the intervening region generates a population of energetic neutrals that must also be accounted for in models of wall sputtering and erosion. Furthermore, this work emphasizes the importance of kinetic effects in the magnetized presheath when ion flux tubes intersect the wall [@daub:98], which are not adequately included in the present theoretical models.
This recent work shows that assumptions underlying common models can be too restrictive to apply to many real experimental circumstances. Since magnetization is important in so many applications, this presents an impetus for both further theoretical development and more rigorous experimental tests to extend magnetized sheath models. In this regard, some of the kinetic effects regarding ion sheaths presented in section \[sec:is\] may be applied or extended to the magnetized plasmas. For example, it was shown that ion-acoustic and ion-ion two-stream instabilities can be important in the unmagnetized presheath. Naturally, in a magnetized plasma one would expect that it may be the ion cyclotron instability that is excited. This may influence scattering, and other fluid properties of the plasma-boundary transition, in similar, but also predictably distinct, ways in comparison to the unmagnetized case.
Furthermore, beyond ion sheaths, there has been very little work on the influence of a magnetic field on sheaths near biased electrodes. One of the few areas that have been investigated are fireballs in a magnetic field [@torv:79; @ande:81], as summarized in section \[sec:fb\_mag\]. Many of the new results pertaining to the other sheath types (electron sheaths, double sheaths, anode glow) would also be expected to change in response to a magnetic field. There is a significant opportunity for novel research directions here. For example, section \[sec:es\] described the recent discovery of an electron presheath and associated electron drift near a positively biased electrode. Is there a magnetic electron presheath? If so, does it have analogous properties to the magnetic ion presheath? The electron drift in the electron presheath was observed to excite strong ion-acoustic instabilities. Would a magnetic presheath drive strong ion cyclotron waves? High frequency (order $\omega_{pe}$) fluctuations are routinely observed near positively biased electrodes. Does the nature of these fluctuations change if the plasma is magnetized? Are upper hybrid modes excited in this case? The influence of magnetization on sheaths near biased electrodes is an area that is ripe for investigation.
rf Capacitively Coupled Plasmas (CCP)
-------------------------------------
Although this review focuses on dc biased electrodes, plasmas in many experiments and industrial plasma reactors are generated by rf biasing. A detailed and validated picture of rf ion sheaths has been developed over the years, and is well described in textbooks [@lieb:05; @chab:11]. Here, we simply comment on a couple of ways in which the recent work on dc biased electrodes may contribute to a better understanding of rf discharges.
One aspect is the possible role of instabilities in the presheath. For example, many of the industrial plasmas in which rf discharges are used contain multiple species of positively charged ions. Does the instability-enhanced friction effect described in section \[sec:is\_mis\] influence the ion energy at the sheath edge of an rf discharge as well? Bogdanova *et al* [@bogd:19] have recently investigated the ion composition of rf Ar/H$_2$ mixtures in an rf CCP, but the broader question of the potential role of instabilities is a complicated one that depends on the bias frequency, particle ion species and concentrations, pressure, and other plasma parameters. The bias frequency of many CCP discharges can be close to the expected unstable wave frequency. Does this stop, or otherwise change the nature of, the instabilities and related influence on transport? If present, can the bias frequency and plasma parameters be tailored in a way to take advantage of the instability-enhanced friction? A similar set of questions can also be asked in relation to ion-acoustic instabilities in a single species plasma.
A second aspect is the role of electron sheaths near rf biased electrodes. Typically the plasma potential is above the electrode potential over the entire phase of the rf cycle [@chab:11]. However, electric field reversals have also been measured [@sato:90; @czar:99; @maho:97; @gans:04; @toch:92; @turn:92] and simulated [@turn:92; @bele:90; @vend:92; @lero:95]. Here, electric field reversal means that the electrode is biased above the plasma potential for a short phase of the rf cycle. Electric field reversals have been attributed to the role of electron inertia near the electrode, as well as collisional drag on electrons in higher pressure regimes. Schulze *et al* [@schu:08] provide a summary of these results, and also show using both experiments and PIC simulations that electric field reversals can occur in dual frequency discharges as well.
The recent advances in understanding dc electron sheaths presented in section \[sec:es\] may be applicable to electric field reversals in CCPs. In particular, the discovery that an electron presheath extends far into the plasma and that it causes a flow-shift of the electron distribution would be expected to influence the electron energy distribution function in CCPs. Electron beams have been observed in CCPs [@schu:08b]. As in the dc electron sheath, electron drifts may excite ion-plasma frequency instabilities as electrons drift relative to the ions. The excited waves may influence both ion and electron transport through wave-particle collisions. Furthermore, high frequency (electron plasma frequency) waves that have been observed in the dc case may also occur with rf biasing. In fact, evidence for high frequency instabilities have been observed in PIC simulations [@diom:14].
Finally, the geometric considerations of section \[sec:gc\] might be applied to CCP design. In particular, that section discusses the size requirements for the electrode and other boundaries that are required for a dc electrode to be biased above the plasma potential. How do these conditions change for rf biasing? If electron beams produce desirable effects in the plasma, could applying rf to electrodes that are sufficiently small to be biased above the plasma potential provide a measure of control, or other advantages? Could a combination of electrodes of different sizes, and different dc bias potential, be used to tailor plasma properties in a desirable way?
Electronegative Plasmas
-----------------------
Many plasmas, including most material processing reactors, contain negatively charged ions. Negatively charged ions are known to significantly alter ion sheath properties [@boyd:59; @brai:88; @fran:92; @lich:94; @lich:97; @sher:99b; @kouz:99; @chab:00; @chab:01; @sobo:17]. For instance, the plasma-boundary transition of an electronegative plasma is thought to consist of three regions: an electronegative core, electropositive halo, and a positive ion rich sheath. Under certain conditions the core and halo are predicted to be separated by a double layer [@brai:88; @fran:92]. There is generally thought to be a good description of the plasma-boundary transition region near floating or grounded boundaries in electronegative discharges. Several aspects of these models have been validated experimentally, including the negative ion density profile [@bere:00] and the assumption that negative ions are in Boltzmann equilibrium [@ghim:09]. Despite the progress in understanding the ion sheath, there is relatively little understanding of the behavior of biased electrodes in electronegative discharges. Potentially interesting opportunities exist to apply some of the concepts discussed in this review to plasmas containing negative ions. For instance, section \[sec:gc\] considered the geometric criteria required to bias an electrode above the plasma potential. Reconsidering this condition in the presence of a negative ion species, one may expect that a much larger electrode could be biased positive with respect to the plasma since the area ratio criterion for doing so is characterized by $\sqrt{m_-/m_+}$ where $m_-$ is the mass of the negative charge carrier and $m_+$ is the mass of the positive charge carrier. Such biased electrodes might be used to control the concentration of negative ions in the plasma. Furthermore, the basics of the analog of electron sheaths in a plasma containing negative ions is relatively unexplored. How does a negatively charged sheath transition from a thin electron sheath at low (or no) electronegativity to a negative ion sheath at high electronegativity? What are the basic properties of such a sheath? A variety of instabilities exist in electronegative discharges [@chab:01] because positive and negative ions flow in opposite directions in response to a boundary electric field. Does the instability-enhanced friction mechanism influence the relative drifts of positive and negative ions, as it was seen to do amongst positive ion species in section \[sec:is\_mis\]? Does this change the predicted flow profiles, or electric field characteristics, of the plasma-boundary transition region?
Summary\[sec:conc\]
===================
Positively biased electrodes are a common feature in many plasma diagnostics and applications. How these electrodes influence the plasma, and how the plasma influences the electrodes, are both governed by the properties of the sheath structure near the electrode surface. This sheath can take a wide variety of forms, including ion sheath, electron sheath, double sheath, anode glow double layer, or fireball double layer. Each is different and influences plasma-boundary interactions in different ways. Knowing which will form can be critical to design of applications and diagnostics, but this can be a complicated question to answer because it depends not only on local properties of the electrode or plasma, but also on the global confinement properties. An estimate of the plasma potential can be obtained from considerations of global current balance, but a precise determination depends on factors such as the effective area for collecting species at each boundary, sticking coefficients, emission properties, plasma gradients, and material composition.
This review summarized a number of recent advances in our understanding of each of these types of sheaths. One theme of the recent results is kinetic effects. Since the sheath and presheath is often shorter, or comparable to, relevant collision mean free paths, the boundary selectively removes certain classes of particles from the velocity phase-space distributions. For ion sheaths, these effects were shown to be especially significant when an electrode is biased near the plasmas potential; particularly when it is within an electron temperature of the plasma potential. For example, a subsonic Bohm criterion for the ion speed at the sheath edge was observed to arise due to absorption of electrons at the electrode. Kinetic effects were also shown to be important to the EVDF near an electron sheath. Here, the EVDF was observed to consist of a flow-shift on the order of the electron thermal speed in addition to the traditionally predicted depletion of the EVDF associated with electrons lost to the electrode. This is a substantial change from the conventional picture, which did not include a flow shift, and it led to the prediction and validation of an electron-sheath equivalent of the Bohm criterion that is satisfied primary by the electron flow shift. Kinetic effects were also observed in both double sheaths and fireballs. In fireballs, a new category of kinetic effect was observed to arise from ionization. One example was the formation mechanism, which was found to be associated with a local potential well that forms due to increased ionization near the electrode surface.
A second major theme of recent results is the importance of flow-induced instabilities. Traditional theories of dc sheaths are typically based on steady-state fluid or kinetic descriptions in which plasma parameters smoothly transition from the plasma to the boundary in a laminar manner. The new research has revealed that as ions or electrons flow toward the boundary they often spontaneously excite flow-driven instabilities (sometimes called kinetic or Vlasov instabilities). These instabilities can feed back to influence plasma properties. In fact, rather than being a rare occurrence, they were found to lead to observable, and sometimes important, effects in each of the types of sheaths discussed. In ion sheaths, ion-acoustic instabilities were observed to increase the ion-ion collision rate, creating a thermalizing effect on the IVDF. These were also predicted to influence the EVDF. In a two-ion-species plasma, ion-ion two-stream instabilities were found to lead to an enhanced ion-ion friction force that significantly influences the speed of each species as they traverse the presheath and enter the sheath. In electron sheaths, the fast electron flow was observed to excite large-amplitude ion-acoustic instabilities that cause the sheath to fluctuate. High-frequency instabilities, near the electron plasma frequency, have also been observed near electron sheaths. In double sheaths, counter streaming ion populations were observed to induce ion-ion two-stream instabilities, which caused a significant reduction in their flow speeds due to the associated enhanced friction force. Electron-electron two-stream instabilities were observed in the presence of electron emission. Finally, ion-streaming inside of a fireball was observed to lead to similar ion-acoustic type instabilities as in an ion sheath. Other global relaxation-type instabilities were also observed to be a prominent feature of fireballs.
In addition to recent advances, a number of unresolved questions were identified. These include the need for more direct measurements of the presence of instabilities and their influence on ion and electron distribution functions. A number of issues remain unresolved with respect to the conditions at which double sheaths form, including the role of ion pumping, determining when double sheaths are steady-state or transitory solutions, as well as the role of electron emission from boundaries. Similarly, although basic mechanisms of formation and steady-state properties of fireballs have been identified, many questions remain. There is not a good explanation for the observed oblong shape of fireballs in some circumstances, particularly in describing the role of a magnetic field, nor for the observations where the shape can be non-spherical in seemingly low-magnetic field experiments. A wide range of possible applications may be possible by utilizing fireballs, or any of the other observed sheath types.
A number of open questions remain in topics that overlap with what was discussed in this review, but which were not discussed directly. One very important area is the influence of magnetic fields on sheaths [@sidd:16], including the variety of sheath types discussed here. Another is high pressure discharges. This review concentrated on low-pressure (mTorr range) discharges, but recent trends in the field have focused on pressures near atmospheric pressure [@adam:17]. It is certain that much, if not most, of the basic properties of sheaths that were discussed in this review will need to be substantially modified in these highly collisional situations. Likewise, in many of these applications boundary material plays a more active role in the local plasma physics, such as evaporation from liquid boundaries. The transfer of matter and chemical reactivity from the plasma through the boundary is also a key issue in this field, which is related to sheaths, but is not often addressed in low-pressure discharges.
Advances in diagnostics, particularly non-invasive diagnostics such as optical-based methods, are likely to help advance this field. Similarly, the ability to perform more sophisticated computer simulations of sheaths in two and three dimensions, using kinetic methods such as PIC are helping to accelerate the rate of advances. The importance of sheaths to the wide-variety of plasma-based applications, and the slew of unanswered questions that remain, ensure that sheaths will continue to remain a vibrant research topic.
Acknowledgments {#acknowledgments .unnumbered}
===============
The first author thanks Noah Hershkowitz for introducing him to all of the topics discussed in this review, and for many educational conversations over the past fifteen years. We also thank Ryan Hood, Lucas Beving, Fred Skiff, Robert Merlino, Greg Severn, and Chi-Sung Yip for helpful conversations related to this material. This work was supported by the Office of Fusion Energy Science at the U.S. Department of Energy under contracts DE-AC04-94SL85000 and DE-SC0016473.
References {#references .unnumbered}
==========
[99]{}
Langmuir I 1923 [*Gen. Elec. Rev.*]{} [**XXVI**]{} 731
Langmuir I 1929 [**]{} [**33**]{} 954
Riemann K U 1991 [*J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys*]{} [**24**]{} 493
Franklin R N 2003 [*J. Phys. D*]{} [**36**]{} R309
Lieberman M A and Lichtenberg A J 2005 [*Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing*]{}
Robertson S 2013 [*Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion*]{} [**55**]{} 093001
Hershkowitz N 2005 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**18**]{} 055502
Coburn W and Winters F 1979 [*J. Vacuum Sci. Technol.*]{} [**16**]{} 391
Wu B, Kumar A and Pamarthy S 2010 [*J. Appl. Phys.*]{} [**108**]{} 051101
Stangeby P C 1984 [*Phys. Fluids*]{} [**27**]{} 682
Merlino R L 2007 [*Am. J. Phys.*]{} [**75**]{} 1078
Halekas J S, Saito Y, Delory G T, Farrell W M 2011 [*Planetary and Space Sci.*]{} [**59**]{} 1681
Garrett H B 1981 [*Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics*]{} [**19**]{} 577
Jacobsen K S, Pedersen A, Moen J I and Bekkeng T A 2010 [*Meas. Sci. Technol.*]{} [**21**]{} 085902
Baalrud S D and Hegna C C 2011 025013
Scheiner B, Baalrud S D, Hopkins M M, Yee B T, and Barnat E V 2016 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**23**]{} 083510
Baalrud S D 2016 025008
Yee B T, Scheiner B, Baalrud S D, Barnat E V, and Hopkins M M 2017 025009
Scheiner B, Baalrud S D, Yee B T, Hopkins M M, and Barnat E V 2015 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**22**]{} 123520
Stenzel R L 1988 [*Phys. Rev. Lett.*]{} [**60**]{} 704
Hershkowitz N 1994 [*IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.*]{} [**22**]{} 11
Baalrud S D, Hershkowitz N, and Longmier B 2007 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**14**]{} 042109
Hood R, Scheiner B, Baalrud S D, Hopkins M M, Barnat E V, Yee B T, Merlino R L, and Skiff F 2016 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**23**]{} 113503
Intrator T, Cho M H, Wang E Y, Hershkowitz N, Diebold D and DeKock J 1988 [*J. Appl. Phys.*]{} [**64**]{} 2927
Hershkowitz N, Forest C, Wang E Y and Intrator T 1987 [*Laser and Particle Beams*]{} [**5**]{} 257
Hershkowitz N 1985 [*Space Sci. Rev. *]{} [**41**]{} 351
Forest C and Hershkowitz N 1986 [*J. Appl. Phys.*]{} [**60**]{} 1295
Stenzel R L, Ionita C and Schrittwieser R 2008 035006
Baalrud S D, Longmier B, and Hershkowitz N 2009 035002
Scheiner B, Barnat E V, Baalrud S D, Hopkins M M, and Yee B T 2017 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**24**]{} 113520
Stenzel R L, Ionita C and Schrittwieser R 2011 [*J. Appl. Phys.*]{} [**109**]{} 113305
Makrinich G and Fruchtman A 2014 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**21**]{} 023505
Sheridan T E 2000 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**7**]{} 3084
Hershkowitz N, Cho M-H and Pruski J 1992 87
Hubble A A, Barnat E V, Weatherford B R and Foster J E 2014 022001
Arthur N A, Foster J E and Barnat E V 2018 055020
Hopkins M M, Yee B T, Baalrud S D, and Barnat E V 2016 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**23**]{} 063519
Hershkowitz N 1989 “How Langmuir Probes Work” in [*Plasma Diagnostics Volume 1: Discharge Parameters and Chemistry*]{} Academic Press
Lee D and Hershkowitz N 2007 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**14**]{} 033507
Bronold F X and Fehske H 2015 [*Phys. Rev. Lett.*]{} [**115**]{} 225001
Barnat E V, Laity G R, and Baalrud S D 2014 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**21**]{} 103512
Limpaecher R and MacKenzie K R 1973 [**]{} [**44**]{} 726
Cooper C M, Weisberg D B, Khalzov I, Milhone J, Flanagan K, Peterson E, Wahl C and Forest C B 2016 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**23**]{} 102505
Longmier B, Baalrud S, and Hershkowitz N 2006 [*Rev. Sci. Instrum.*]{} [**77**]{} 113504
Longmier B 2007 [*Plasma Sheath Behavior in a Total Nonambipolar Radio Frequency Generated Plasma Electron Source*]{} (PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison) p 104-126
Longmier B and Hershkowitz N 2008 [**]{} [**79**]{} 093506
Severn G D and Hershkowitz N 1992 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**4**]{} 3210
Schweigert I V, Kaganovich I D and Demidov V I 2013 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**20**]{} 101606
Demidov V I, Kudryavtsev A A, Kurlyandskaya I P, and Stepanova O M 2014 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**21**]{} 094501
MacKenzie K R, Taylor R J, Cohn D, Ault E and Ikezi H 1971 [*Ap. Phys. Lett.*]{} [**18**]{} 529
Yip C-S, Sheehan J P, Hershkowitz N and Severn G 2013 065002
Yip C-S and Hershkowitz N 2015 034004
Torvén S and Anderson D 1979 [**]{} [**12**]{} 717
Cartier S L and Merlino R L 1987 [*Phys. Fluids*]{} [**30**]{} 2549
Song B, D’Angelo N and Merlino R L 1991 [**]{} [**24**]{} 1789
Song B, D’Angelo N and Merlino R L 1992 [**]{} [**25**]{} 938
Riemann K-U 1995 [*IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.*]{} [**23**]{} 709
Bohm D 1949 [*Characteristics of Electrical Discharges in Magnetic Fields*]{} ed Guthrie A and Wakerling R K (New York: McGraw-Hill) Ch 3
Riemann K U 1997 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**4**]{} 4158
Franklin R N 2002 [*IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.*]{} [**30**]{} 352
Kaganovich I D 2002 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**9**]{} 4788
Godyak V A and Sternberg N 1990 [*IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.*]{} [**18**]{} 159
Franklin R N and Snell J 2000 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**7**]{} 3077
Franklin R N and Ockendon 1970 [*Journal of Plasma Phys.*]{} [**4**]{} 371
Benilov M S 2000 [*IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.*]{} [**28**]{} 2207
Riemann K-U, Seebacher J, Tskhakaya D D and Kuhn S 2005 1949
Godyak V and Sternberg N 2003 [*IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.*]{} [**31**]{} 303
Sheridan T E and Goree J A 1989 [*IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.*]{} [**17**]{} 884
Sheridan T E and Goree J 1991 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**3**]{} 2796
Godyak V A 1982 [*Phys. Lett.*]{} [**89A**]{} 80
Oksuz L and N. Hershkowitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**89**]{}, 145001 (2002).
Oksuz L and Hershkowitz N 2005 201
Claire N, Bachet G, Stroth U and Doveil F 2006 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**13**]{} 062103
Jacobs B, Gekelman W, Pribyl P, Barnes M and Kilgore M 2007 [*Appl. Phys. Lett.*]{} [**91**]{} 161505
Hershkowitz N, Ko E, Wang X and Hala A M A 2005 [*IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.*]{} [**33**]{} 631
Goeckner M J, Goree J and Sheridan T E 1992 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**4**]{} 1663
Moore N B, Gekelman W, Pribyl P, Zhang Y and Kushner M J 2013 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**20**]{} 083506
Schwager L A and Birdsall C K 1990 [*Phys. Fluids B*]{} [**2**]{} 1057
Procassini R J, Birdsall C K and Morse E C 1990 [*Phys. Fluids B*]{} [**2**]{} 3191
Procassini R J and Birdsall C K 1991 [*Phys. Fluids B*]{} [**3**]{} 1879
Tsushima A and Kabaya S 1998 [*J. Phys. Soc. Japan*]{} [**67**]{} 2315
Jelić N, Riemann K-U, Gyergyek T, Kuhn S, Stanojević M and Duhovnik J 2007 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**14**]{} 103506
Miloch W J, Gulbrandsen N, Mishra L N, and Fredriksen A 2011 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**18**]{} 083502
Cagas P, Hakim A, Juno J and Srinivasan B 2017 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**24**]{} 022118
Hara K and Hanquist K 2018 065004
Lee D, Hershkowitz N, and Severn G 2008 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**15**]{} 083503
Meige A, Sutherland O, Smith H B and Boswell R W 2007 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**14**]{} 032104
Kawamura E, Vahedi V, Lieberman M A and Birdsall C K 1999 R45
Hala A M 2000 [*Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin*]{}
Baalrud S D, Callen J D and Hegna C C 2009 [**102**]{} 245005
Baalrud S D, Hegna C C and Callen J D 2009 [*Phys. Rev. Lett.*]{} [**103**]{} 205002
Baalrud S D and Hegna C C 2011 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**18**]{} 023505
Yip C-S, Hershkowitz N and Severn G D 2010 [*Phys. Rev. Lett.*]{} [**104**]{} 225003
Hershkowitz N, Yip C-S and Severn G D 2011 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**18**]{} 057102
Baalrud S D, Lafleur T, Fox W and Germaschewski K 2015 015034
Zhang Z and Wang X 2012 [*Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion*]{} [**54**]{} 082001
Sheridan T E and Baalrud S D 2017 [*Phys. Rev. E*]{} [**96**]{} 053201
Adrian P J, Baalrud S D, and Lafleur T 2017 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**24**]{} 123505
Penrose O 1960 [*Phys. Fluids*]{} [**3**]{} 258
Baalrud S D, Callen J D and Hegna C C 2008 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**15**]{} 092111
Baalrud S D, Callen J D and Hegna C C 2010 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**17**]{} 055704
Bachet G, Chérigier L and Doveil F 1995 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**2**]{} 1782
Manfredi G and Valsaque F 2004 [*Computer Phys. Communications*]{} [**164**]{} 262
Biloiu I A and Scime E E 2010 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**17**]{} 113509
Pigeon V, Claire N, Arnas C, and Doveil F 2019 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**26**]{} 023508
Tonks L and Langmuir I 1929 [*Phys. Rev. *]{} [**34**]{} 876
Robertson S 2009 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**16**]{} 103503
Gottscho R A 1993 [*J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B*]{} [**11**]{} 1884
Yip C-S and Hershkowitz N 2015 015018
Coulette D and Manfredi G 2015 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**22**]{} 043505
Harrison E R and Thompson W B 1959 [*Proc. Phys. Soc.*]{} [**74**]{} 145
Caruso A and Cavaliere A 1962 [*Nuovo Cimento*]{} [**26**]{} 1389
Self S A 1963 [*Phys. Fluids*]{} [**6**]{} 1762
Emmert G A, Wieland R M, Mense A T and Davidson J N 1980 [*Phys. Fluids*]{} [**23**]{} 803
Bissell R C and Johnson P C 1987 [*Phys. Fluids*]{} [**30**]{} 779
Scheuer J T and Emmert G A 1988 [*Phys. Fluids*]{} [**31**]{} 1748; [**31**]{} 3645
Sheridan T E 2001 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**8**]{} 4240
Tskhakaya Sr D D, Kos L and Jelić N 2014 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**21**]{} 073503
van den Berg H P, Riemann K-U and Ecker G 1991 [*Phys. Fluids B*]{} [**3**]{} 838
Riemann K-U 1981 [*Phys. Fluids*]{} [**24**]{} 2163
Sato K and Miyawaki F 1992 [*Phys. Fluids B*]{} [**4**]{} 1247
Godyak V A, Meytlis V P and Strauss H R 1995 [*IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.*]{} [**23**]{} 728
Sheridan T E, Braithwaite N St J and Boswell R W 1999 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**6**]{} 4375
Fried B D, Gell-Mann M, Jackson J D and Wyld H W 1960 [*J. Nucl. Energy, Part C: Plasma Physics*]{} **1** 190
Koshkarov O, Smolyakov A I, Kaganovich I D, and Ilgisonis V I 2015 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**22**]{} 052113
Langmuir I 1925 [*Phys. Rev. *]{} [**26**]{} 585
Dittmer A F 1926 [*Phys. Rev.*]{} [**28**]{} 507
Gabor D 1955 [*Nature*]{} [**176**]{} 916
Godyak V and Alexandrovich B 2015 052001
Gorgoraky V I 1998 [*Contr. Plasma Phys.*]{} [**38**]{} 637
Tsendin L D 2003 S51
Tsendin L D 2009 014020
Vedenov A A 1962 [*Plasma Physics*]{} [**5**]{} 169
Godyak V A and Demidov V I 2011 233001
Cook M J 1980 *Properties of optically pumped discharges*, D. Phil Thesis, University of Oxford
Benilov M S 1996 364
Valentini H-B and Herrmann F 1996 1175
Franklin R N 2000 [*J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.*]{} [**33**]{} 3186; 2001 [**34**]{} 1959; 2003 [**36**]{} 34; 2003 [**36**]{} 1806; 2003 [**36**]{} R309
Severn G D, Wang X, Ko E and Hershkowitz N 2003 [*Phys. Rev. Lett.*]{} [**90**]{} 145001
Wang X and Hershkowitz N 2006 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**13**]{} 053503
Lee D, Hershkowitz N and Severn G D 2007 [*Appl. Phys. Lett.*]{} [**91**]{} 041505
Oksuz L, Lee D and Hershkowitz N 2008 015012
Lee D, Oksuz L and Hershkowitz N 2007 [*Phys. Rev. Lett.*]{} [**99**]{} 155004
Kim N-K, Huh S-R, Roh H-J, Park S and Kim G-H 2015 225201
Yip C-S, Hershkowitz N, Severn G and Baalrud S D 2016 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**23**]{} 050703
Severn G, Yip C-S, Hershkowitz N and Baalrud S D 2017 055021
Gudmundsson J T and Lieberman M A 2011 [*Phys. Rev. Lett.*]{} [**107**]{} 045002
Hershkowitz N, Severn G D, Baalrud S D, Hegna C C and Callen J D 2012 [*Phys. Rev. Lett.*]{} [**108**]{} 139501
Scheiner B and Adrian P J 2019 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**26**]{} 034501
Kim N-K, Song J, Roh H-J, Jang Y, Ryu S, Huh S-R and Kim G-H 2017 06LT01
Franklin R N 2003 [*J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.*]{} [**36**]{} 2821
Brinkmann R P 2011 042002
Lunt T, Fussmann G and Waldmann O 2008 [*Phys. Rev. Lett.*]{} [**100**]{} 175004
Loizu J, Ricci P and Theiler C 2011 [*Phys. Rev. E*]{} [**83**]{} 016406
Baalrud S D, Scheiner B, Yee B, Hopkins M, and Barnat E 2015 044003
Baalrud S D and Hegna C C 2012 068002
Riemann K-U 2012 068001
Hall L S 1962 [*Proc. Phys. Soc.*]{} [**80**]{} 309
Fernsler R F, Slinker S P and Joyce G 2005 [*Phys. Rev. E*]{} [**71**]{} 026401
Tsankov T V and Czarnetzki U 2017 055003
Loizu J, Dominski J, Ricci P and Theiler C 2012 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**19**]{} 083507
Baalrud S D 2013 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**20**]{} 012118
Xie H-S 2013 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**20**]{} 092125
Frederick-Frost K M and Lynch K A 2007 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**14**]{} 123503
Chen F 2006 773
Sánchez-Arriaga G 2013 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**20**]{} 013504
Sánchez-Arriaga G and Pastor-Moreno D 2014 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**21**]{} 073504
Baldwin D E 1967 [*Phys. Rev. Lett.*]{} [**18**]{} 1119
Berumen J and Skiff F 2018 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**25**]{} 122102
Glanz J and Hershkowitz N 1981 [*Plasma Phys.*]{} [**23**]{} 325
O’Neil T M 1965 [*Phys. Fluids*]{} [**14**]{} 2255
Stenzel R L 1989 [*Phys. Fluids B*]{} [**1**]{} 2273
Stenzel R L 2010 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**17**]{} 062109
Haas F A, Al-Kuzee J and Braithwaite N St J 2005 [*Appl. Phys. Lett.*]{} [**87**]{} 201503
Stenzel R L 1976 [*Rev. Sci. Instrum.*]{} [**47**]{} 603
Bliokh Y, Felsteiner J and Slutsker Ya. Z 2012 [*J. Appl. Phys.*]{} [**111**]{} 013302
Zweben S J, Maqueda R J, Roquemore A L, Bush C E, Kaita R, Marsala R J, Raitses Y, Cohen R H and Ryutov D D 2009 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 51 105012
Theiler C, Furno I, Loizu J and Fasoli A 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 065005
Singh N and Jaggernauth A 1996 [*J. Geophys. Res.*]{} [**101**]{} 17229
Schiesko L, Carrére M, Cartry G and Layet J-M 2008 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**15**]{} 073507
Cho M-H, Hershkowitz N and Intrator T 1990 [*J. Appl. Phys.*]{} [**67**]{} 3254
Bailung H, Pal A R, Adhikary N C, Gogoi H K and Chutia J 2006 59
Sun Y, Wei Z, Ma J X, Jiang, Z and Wu F 2015 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**22**]{} 063510
Yip C-S and Hershkowitz 2015 [*J. Phys. D*]{} [**48**]{} 395201
Hobbs G D and Wesson J A 1967 [*Plasma Phys.*]{} [**9**]{} 85
Guernsey R L and Fu J H M 1970 [*J. Geophys. Res.*]{} [**75**]{} 3193
Cheng G and Liu L 2011 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**18**]{} 033507
Li W, Ma J X, Li J, Zheng Y and Tan M 2012 [*Phys. Plasma*]{} [**19**]{} 030704
Schweigert I V, Langendorf S J, Walker M L R, and Keidar M 2015 025012
Hershkowitz N 1985 [*Space Sci. Rev.*]{} [**41**]{} 351
Charles C 2007 R1
Andrews J G and Allen J E 1971 [*Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A*]{} [**320**]{} 459
Wang E Y, Hershkowitz N, Intrator T and Forest C 1986 [*Rev. Sci. Instrum.*]{} [**57**]{} 2425
Schulze J, Donkó Z, Heil B G, Luggenhölscher D, Mussenbrock T, Brinkmann R P and Czarnetzki U 2008 [*J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.*]{} [**41**]{} 105214
Yip C-S, Hershkowitz N and Severn G 2017 015008
Fang M T C, Fraser D A and Allen J E 1969 [*J. Phys. D*]{} [**2**]{} 229
Gekelman W, Pribyl P, Lucky Z, Drandell M, Leneman D, Maggs J, Vincena S, Van Compernolle B, Tripathi S K P, Morales G, Carter T A, Wang Y and DeHaas T 2016 [*Rev. Sci. Instrum.*]{} [**87**]{} 025105
Schweigert I V 2015 034008
Komm M, Ratynskaia S, Tolias P, Cavalier J, Dejarnac R, Gunn J P, and Podolnik A 2017 094002
Campanell M D and Johnson G R 2019 [*Phys. Rev. Lett.*]{} [**122**]{} 015003
Hanquist K M, Hara K and Boyd I D 2017 [*J. Appl. Phys.*]{} [**121**]{} 053302
Whipple E C 1981 [*Rep. Prog. Phys.*]{} [**44**]{} 1197
Poppe A, Halekas J S and Horányi M 2011 [*J. Geophys. Res.*]{} [**38**]{} L02103
Sorasio G, Mendis D A and Rosenberg M 2001 [*Planetary and Space Science*]{} [**49**]{} 1257
Delzanno G L and Tang X-Z 2014 [*Phys. Rev. Lett.*]{} [**113**]{} 035002
Autricque A, Khrapak S A, Couëdel L, Fedorczak N, Arnas C, Layet J-M and Grisolia C 2018 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**25**]{} 063701
Kemp R F and Sellen J M 1966 [*Rev. Sci. Instrum.*]{} [**37**]{} 455
Ye M Y and Takamura S 2000 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**7**]{} 3457
Smith J R, Hershkowitz N and Coakley P 1979 [*Rev. Sci. Instrum.*]{} [**50**]{} 210
Sheehan J P and Hershkowitz N 2011 063001
Oksuz L and Hershkowitz N 2011 [*Phys. Lett. A*]{} [**375**]{} 2162
Campanell M D 2013 [*Phys. Rev. E*]{} [**88**]{} 033103
Campanell M D 2015 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**22**]{} 040702
Campanell M D and Umansky MV 2016 [*Phys. Rev. Lett.*]{} [**116**]{} 085003
Schwager L A 1993 [*Phys. Fluids B*]{} [**5**]{} 631
Tierno S P, Donoso J M, Domenech-Garret J L, and Conde L 2016 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**23**]{} 013503
Rynn N 1966 [*Phys. Fluids*]{} [**9**]{} 165
Braithwaite N St J and Allen J E 1981 [*Int. J. Electronics*]{} [**51**]{} 637
Sydorenko D, Kaganovich I, Raitses Y and Smolyakov A 2009 [*Phys. Rev. Lett.*]{} [**103**]{} 145004
Campanell M D, Khrabrov A V, and Kaganovich I D 2012 [*Phys. Rev. Lett.*]{} [**108**]{} 255001
Sheehan J P, Hershkowitz N, Kaganovich I D, Wang H, Raitses Y, Barnat E V, Weatherford B R and Sydorenko D 2013 [*Phys. Rev. Lett.*]{} [**111**]{} 075002
Sheehan J P, Kaganovich I D, Wang H, Sydorenko D, Raitses Y and Hershkowitz N 2014 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**21**]{} 063502
Sheehan J P, Barnat E V, Weatherford B R, Kaganovich I D and Hershkowitz N 2014 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**21**]{} 013510
Coakley P G and Hershkowitz N 1980 [*Phys. Lett.*]{} [**78A**]{} 145
Sydorenko D, Smolyakov A, Kaganovich I and Raitses Y 2007 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**14**]{} 013508
Morozov A I and Savel’ev V V 2002 [*Plasma Phys. Reports*]{} [**28**]{} 1017
Campanell M D, Khrabrov A V, and Kaganovich I D 2012 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**19**]{} 123513
Kaganovich I D, Raitses Y, Sydorenko D and Smolyakov A 2007 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**14**]{} 057104
Sydorenko D, Smolyakov A, Kaganovich I and Raitses Y 2008 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**15**]{} 053506
Campanell M D and Umansky M V 2017 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**24**]{} 057101
Emeleus K G 1982 [*Int. J. Electronics*]{} [**52**]{} 407
Conde L, Ferro Fontán C and Lambás J 2006 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**13**]{} 113504
Song B, Merlino R L and D’Angelo N 1992 [**]{} [**45**]{} 391
Stenzel R L, Gruenwald J, Ionita C and Schrittwieser R 2011 045017
Stenzel R L, Gruenwald J, Fonda B, Ionita C and Schrittwieser R 2011 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**18**]{} 012104
Stenzel R L, Gruenwald J, Fonda B, Ionita C and Schrittwieser R 2011 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**18**]{} 012105
Stenzel R L, Gruenwald J, Ionita C and Schrittwieser R 2012 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**21**]{} 015012
Levko D 2017 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**24**]{} 053514
Rubens S M and Henderson J E 1940 [**]{} [**58**]{} 446
Park Y-S, Lee Y, Chung K-J and Hwang Y S 2011 [*Rev. Sci. Instrum.*]{} [**82**]{} 123303
Park Y-S, Lee Y, Dang J-J, Chung K-J, and Hwang Y S 2014 [*Rev. Sci. Instrum.*]{} [**85**]{} 02A508
Ahedo E 1996 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**3**]{} 3875
Lapuerta V and Ahedo E 2000 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**7**]{} 2693
Sanduloviciu M, Borcia C and Leu G 1995 [*Phys. Lett. A*]{} [**208**]{} 136
Strat M, Strat G and Gurlui S 1999 [*J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.*]{} [**32**]{} 34
Sanduloviciu M and Lozneanu E 1986 [**]{} [**28**]{} 585
Tang D and Chu P K 2003 [*J. Appl. Phys.*]{} [**94**]{} 1390
Gurlui S, Agop M, Strat M, Strat G and Băcăiţă S 2005 [*Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.*]{} [**44**]{} 3253
An T, Merlino R L and D’Angelo N 1994 [**]{} [**27**]{} 1906
Seyhoonzadeh A, Forsling P, Bailey M, Rosario R, Beardsley K, Tao J and Lonngren K E 1988 [*Phys. Fluids*]{} [**31**]{} 682
Anders A and Anders S 1995 571
Oprescu B and Popescu S 2000 [**]{} [**33**]{} 2284
Mujawar M A, Karkari S K and Turner M M 2011 015024
Torven S and Lindberg L 1980 [*J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.*]{} [**13**]{} 2285
Weatherford B R, Barnat E V and Foster J E 2012 055030
Scheiner B, Barnat E V, Baalrud S D, Hopkins M M, and Yee B T 2018 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**25**]{} 043513
Block L P 1972 [*Cosmic Electrodyn.*]{} [**3**]{} 349
Block L P 1978 [*Astrophys. Space. Sci.*]{} [**55**]{} 59
Scheiner B, Beving L, Baalrud S D 2019 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**26**]{} 013509
Conde L and León L 1994 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**1**]{} 2441
Nerushev O A, Novopashin S A, Radchenko V V and Sukhinin G I 1998 [*PRE*]{} [**58**]{} 4897
Conde L and León L 1999 [*IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.*]{} [**27**]{} 80
Aflori M, Amarandei G, Ivan L M, Dimitriu D G and Sanduloviciu M 2005 [*IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.*]{} [**33**]{} 542
Ivan L M, Amarandei G, Aflori M, Mihai-Plugaru M, Gaman C, Dimitriu D G and Sanduloviciu M 2005 [*IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.*]{} [**33**]{} 544
Dimitriu D G, Aflori M, Ivan L M, Ionita C and Schrittwieser R W 2007 [**]{} [**49**]{} 237
Dimitriu D G, Aflori M, Ivan L M, Radu V, Poll E and Agop M 2013 035007
Dimitriu D G, Irimiciuc S A, Popescu S, Agop M, Ionita C and Schrittwieser R W 2015 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**22**]{} 113511
Gurlui S, Niculescu O, Dimitriu D G, Ionita C and Schrittwieser R W 2014 [*Int. J. Mass Spectrom.*]{} [**365**]{} 42
Alex P, Arumugham S and Sinha S K 2017 [*Phys. Lett. A*]{} [**381**]{} 3652
Alex P, Carreras B A, Arumugam S and Sinha S K 2017 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**24**]{} 120701
Alex P, Carreras B A, Arumugam S, and Sinha S K 2018 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**25**]{} 053514
Paul M K, Chakraborty S and Bose S 2019 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**26**]{} 023516
Stenzel R L, Gruenwald J, Ionita C and Schrittwieser R 2011 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**18**]{} 062112
Stenzel R L, Gruenwald J, Ionita C and Schrittwieser R 2011 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**18**]{} 062113
Stenzel R L and Urrutia J M 2012 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**19**]{} 082106
Chiriac S, Dimitriu D G and Sanduloviciu M 2007 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**14**]{} 072309
Conde L 2004 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**11**]{} 1955
Alport M J, Cartier S L and Merlino R L 1986 [*J. Geophys. Res.*]{} [**91**]{} 1599
Song B, Merlino R L and D’Angelo N 1992 [**]{} [**45**]{} 395
Stenzel R L, Urrutia J M, Ionita C and Schrittwieser R 2011 [*Contrib. Plasma Phys.*]{} [**51**]{} 560
Chauhan S, Ranjan M, Bandyopadhyay M, and Mukherjee S 2016 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**23**]{} 013502
Chauhan S, Ranjan M, Bandyopadhyay M and Mukherjee S 2016 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} 123524
Rane R, Chauhan S, Bharathi P, Nigam K, Bandyopadhyay P and Mukherjee S 2018 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**25**]{} 093509
Kellog P J, Monson S J and Whalen A B 1984 [*Geophys. Res. Lett.*]{} [**11**]{} 515
Shawhan S D, Fälthammar C-G and Block L P 1978 [*J. Geophys. Res.*]{} [**83**]{} 1049
Benilov M S 1988 [*Sov. Phys.–Tech. Phys.*]{} [**33**]{} 1267
Almeida P G C, Benilov M S and Faria M J 2010 025019
Trelles J P 2016 393002
Verreycken T, Bruggeman P and Leys C 2009 [*J. Appl. Phys.*]{} [**105**]{} 083312
Shirai N, Uchida S and Tochikubo F 2014 054010
Trelles J P 2014 054002
Yang Y, Tanaka K, Liu J and Anders A 2015 [*Appl. Phys. Lett.*]{} [**106**]{} 124102
Abolmasov S N, Tachibana K and Shirafuji T 2011 [*IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.*]{} [**39**]{} 2090
Callegari T, Bernecker B, and Boeuf J P 2014 054003
Boeuf J P, Bernecker B, Callegari T, Blanco S, and Fournier R 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. [**100**]{} 244108
Brandenburg R 2017 053001
Likhanskii A V, Shneider M N, Macheret S O, and Miles R B 2007 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**14**]{} 073501
Schoenbach K H et al 2004 177
Benilov M S 2014 054019
Bieniek M S, Almeida P G C and Benilov M S 2018 05LT03
Rumbach P, Lindsay A E and Go D B 2019 ; in press
Bieniek M S, Almeida P G C, and Benilov M S 2016 [*J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.*]{} [**49**]{} 105201
Chodura R 1982 [*Phys. Fluids*]{} [**25**]{} 1628
Riemann K-U 1994 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**1**]{} 552
Stangeby P C 1995 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**2**]{} 702
Holland D L, Fried B D and Morales G J 1993 [*Phys. Fluids B: Plasma Phys. *]{} [**5**]{} 1723
Hutchinson I H 1996 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**3**]{} 6
Ahedo E 1997 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**4**]{} 4419
Beilis I I and Keidar M 1998 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**5**]{} 1545
Geraldini A, Parra F I and Militello F 2017 025015
Geraldini A, Parra F I and Militello F 2018 125002
Geraldini A, Parra F I and Militello F 2019; arXiV: 1907.09421v1
Stangeby P C 2000 [*The Plasma Boundary of Magnetic Fusion Devices*]{} (CRC Press, Bristol)
Chung K-S, Hutchinson I H, LaBombard B and Conn R W 1989 [*Phys. Fluids B*]{} [**1**]{} 2229
DeWald A B, Bailey A W and Brooks J N 1987 [*Phys. Fluids*]{} [**30**]{} 267
Cohen R H and Ryutov D D 1998 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**5**]{} 808
Tskhakaya D and Kuhn S 2004 [*Cont. Plasma Phys.*]{} [**44**]{} 564
Khaziev R and Curreli D 2015 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**22**]{} 043503
Daube Th, Riemann K-U and Schmitz H 1998 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**5**]{} 117
Devaux S and Manfredi G 2006 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**13**]{} 083504
Coulette D and Manfredi G 2016 025008
Kim G-H, Hershkowitz N, Diebold D A and Cho M-H 1995 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**2**]{} 3222
Singha B, Sarma A and Chutia J 2002 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**9**]{} 683
Siddiqui M U, Jackson C D, Kim J F and Hershkowitz N 2014 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**21**]{} 102103
Siddiqui M U, Thompson D S, Jackson C D, Kim J F, Hershkowitz N and Scime E E 2016 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**23**]{} 057101
Andersson D 1981 [*J. Phys. D*]{} [**14**]{} 1403
Chabert P and Braithwaite N 2011 [*Physics of Radio-Frequency Plasmas*]{} (University Press, Cambridge)
Bogdanova M, Lopaev D, Zyryanov S, Voloshin D and Rakhimova T 2019 095017
Sato A H and Lieberman M A 1990 [*J. Appl. Phys.*]{} [**68**]{} 6117
Czarnetzki U, Luggenhölscher D and Döbele H F 1999 230
Mahony C M O, Al Wazzan R and Graham W G 1997 [*Appl. Phys. Lett.*]{} [**71**]{} 608
Gans T, Schulz-von der Gathen V and Döbele H F 2004 [*Europhys. Lett.*]{} [**66**]{} 232
Tochikubo F, Makabe T, Kakuta S and Suzuki A 1992 [*J. Appl. Phys.*]{} [**71**]{} 2143
Turner M M and Hopkins M B 1992 [*Phys. Rev. Lett.*]{} [**69**]{} 3511
Belenguer Ph and Boeuf J P 1990 [*Phys. Rev. A*]{} [**41**]{} 4447
Vender D and Boswell R W 1992 [*J. Vacuum Sci. Technol. A*]{} [**10**]{} 1331
Leroy O, Stratil P, Perrin J, Jolly J and Belenguer P 1995 [*J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.*]{} [**28**]{} 500
Schulze J, Heil B G, Luggenhölscher D, Mussenbrok T, Brinkmann R P and Czarnetzki U 2008 [*J. Phys. D*]{} [**41**]{} 042003
Diomede P, Economou D J and Donnely V M 2014 [*IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.*]{} [**42**]{} 2822
Boyd R L F and Thompson J B 1959 [*Proc. R. Soc. A*]{} [**252**]{} 102
Braithwaite N St J and Allen J E 1988 [*J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.*]{} [**21**]{} 1733
Franklin R N and Snell J 1992 [*J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.*]{} [**25**]{} 453
Lichtenberg A J, Vahedi V, Lieberman M A and Rognlien T 1994 [*J. Appl. Phys.*]{} [**75**]{} 2339
Lichtenberg A J, Kouznetsov I G, Lee Y T, Lieberman M A, Kaganovich I D and Tsendin L D 1997 437
Sheridan T E, Chabert P and Boswell R W 1999 457
Kouznetsov I G, Lichtenberg A J and Lieberman M A 1999 [*J. Appl. Phys.*]{} [**86**]{} 4142
Chabert P and Sheridan T E 2000 [*J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.*]{} [**33**]{} 1854
Chabert P, Lichtenberg A J, Lieberman M A and Marakhtanov A M 2001 478
Sobolewski M A, Wang Y and Goyette A 2017 [*J. Appl. Phys.*]{} [**122**]{} 053302
Berezhnoj S V, Shin C B, Buddemeier U and Kaganovich I 2000 [*Appl. Phys. Lett.*]{} [**77**]{} 800
Ghim Y-C and Hershkowitz N 2009 [*Phys. Plasmas*]{} [**94**]{} 151503
Adamovich I [*e*t al]{} 2017 [*J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.*]{} [**50**]{} 323001
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
bibliography:
- './auxiliary/refs.bib'
---
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
author:
- |
[Hu Xiaohong$^{1,2}$ ]{} and [^1] [^2]\
[$^{1}$Department of Mathematics, Sichuan University,]{}\
[Chengdu 610064, PR China]{}\
[$^{2}$ Department of Mathematics and Physics,]{}\
[Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications,]{}\
[Chongqing 400065, PR China]{}\
title: ' A New Extension of Serrin’s Lower Semicontinuity Theorem '
---
In this paper, we present a new extension of the famous Serrin’s lower semicontinuity theorem for the variational functional $\int_{\Omega}f(x,u,u')dx$,we prove its lower semicontinuity in $W_{loc}^{1,1}(\Omega)$ with respect to the strong $L_{loc}^{1}$ topology assuming that the integrand $f(x,s,\xi)$ has the usual continuity on all the three variables and the convexity property on the variable $\xi$ and the local absolute continuity on the variable $x$.\
[**Keyword:** ]{} Lower semicontinuity, Serrin’s theorem, strong convergence in $L^{1}$, convex function, local absolute continuity.\
[**2002 Mathematics Subject Classification:**]{} Primary 49J45, Secondary 52A41.
Introduction and Main Results
=============================
The aim of this paper is to give some new sufficient conditions for lower semicontinuity with respect to the strong convergence in $L_{loc}^{1}$ for functionals of integral type $$F(u,\Omega)=\int_{\Omega}f(x,u(x),Du(x))dx,\label{(1.1)}$$ where $\Omega$ is an open set of $R^{n}$, $u$ is in the Sobolev Space$^{[1]}$ $W_{loc}^{1,1}(\Omega)=\{u:u\in L^{1}(K),Du\in
L^{1}(K), \forall K\subset\subset\Omega\}$, $Du$ denotes the generalized gradient of $u$, and the integrand $f(x,s,\xi):\Omega
\times R \times R^{n}\rightarrow
[0,\infty)$ satisfies the following conditions:\
(H1) $f$ is continuous in $\Omega \times R \times R^{n}$ and $f(x,s,\xi)$ is convex in $\xi\in R^{n}$ for all $(x,s)\in \Omega
\times R$.\
The integral functional $F$ is called lower semicontinuous in $W_{loc}^{1,1}(\Omega)$ with respect to the strong convergence in $L_{loc}^{1}$, if for every $u_{m},u \in W_{loc}^{1,1}(\Omega)$ such that $u_{m}\rightarrow u $ in $L_{loc}^{1}$ (where $u_{m}\rightarrow u $ in $L_{loc}^{1}$ means $\|u_{m}-u\|_{L^{1}(K)}\rightarrow 0 \ as \ m\rightarrow +\infty, \forall K\subset\subset\Omega$), then $$\liminf_{m\rightarrow+\infty}F(u_{m},\Omega)\geq
F(u,\Omega).\label{(1.2)}$$ It is well known that condition (H1) alone is not sufficient for strong lower semicontinuity of the integral $F$ in (1.1) (see book \[12\]). In addition to (H1),Serrin published in 1961 an article$^{[13]}$ proposing some sufficient conditions for strong lower semicontinuity. One of the most known and celebrated Serrin’s theorem on this subject is the following one.\
[**Theorem 1.1$^{[13]}$** ]{} Let f satisfy, in addition to (H1), one of the following conditions:\
(a) $f(x, s, \xi)\rightarrow +\infty$ when $|\xi|\rightarrow
+\infty$, for all $(x,s)\in \Omega\times R $;\
(b) $f(x, s, \xi)$ is strictly convex in $\xi \in R^{n}$ for all $(x,s)\in \Omega\times R $;\
(c) the derivatives $f_{x}(x,s,\xi)$, $ f_{\xi}(x,s,\xi)$ and $f_{\xi
x}(x,s,\xi)$ exist and are continuous.\
Then $F(u,\Omega)$ is lower semicontinuous in $W_{loc}^{1,1}(\Omega)$ with respect to the strong convergence in $L_{loc}^{1}$.\
The conditions (a), (b) and (c) quoted above are clearly independent, in the sense that we can find a continuous function $f$ satisfying just one of them, but none of the others . However, the proof of Theorem 1.1 is essentially the same for every condition quoted above; indeed, the proof is based on an approximation theorem for convex functions depending continuously on parameters that can be applied, in particular, when f satisfies one of conditions (a), (b) and (c). This fact suggests the possibility to find a suitable condition weaker than one of conditions (a), (b) and (c). Many attempts have been made to weaken the assumptions on the integrand $f$, such as L. Ambrosio in paper \[2\], V. De Cicco in his paper \[3\] and I. Fonseca in his papers \[6\] and \[7\] proposed several generalizations of Theorem 1.1. In the papers \[9\] and \[10\], Gori prove the following theorems:\
[**Theorem 1.2$^{[9]}$**]{} Let us assume that $f$ satisfies (H1) and also assume that, for every compact set $K \subset \Omega \times R
\times R^{n}$, there exists a constant $L = L(K)$ such that $$|f_{\xi}(x_{1},s,\xi)-f_{\xi}(x_{2},s,\xi)|\leq L|x_{1}-x_{2}|, \
\forall (x_{1},s,\xi),(x_{2},s,\xi)\in K,\label{(1.3)}$$ and, for every compact set $K_{1} \subset \Omega \times R$, there exists a constant $L_{1} = L_{1}(K_{1})$ such that\
$$|f_{\xi}(x,s,\xi)|\leq L_{1}, \ \forall (x,s)\in K_{1}, \ \forall
\xi \in R^{n},\label{(1.4)}$$ $$|f_{\xi}(x,s,\xi_{1})-f_{\xi}(x,s,\xi_{2})|\leq
L_{1}|\xi_{1}-\xi_{2}|, \ \forall (x,s)\in K_{1}, \ \forall \xi_{1},
\xi_{2}\in R^{n}.\label{(1.5)}$$ Then $F(u,\Omega)$ is lower semicontinuous in $W_{loc}^{1,1}(\Omega)$ with respect to the strong convergence in $L_{loc}^{1}$.\
[**Theorem 1.3$^{[9]}$**]{} Let f satisfy (H1) and such that, for every open set $\Omega'\times H \times K \subset \subset \Omega\times R
\times R^{n}$, there exists a constant $L=L_{\Omega'\times H \times
K}$ such that, for every $x_{1},x_{2}
\in \Omega'$, $s\in H$ and $\xi \in K$ ,\
$$|f(x_{1},s,\xi)-f(x_{2},s,\xi)|\leq L|x_{1}-x_{2}|.\label{(1.6)}$$ Then the functional $F(u,\Omega)$ is lower semicontinuous on $W_{loc}^{1,1}(\Omega)$ with respect to the $L_{loc}^{1}$ convergence.\
Condition (1.6) means that $f$ is locally Lipschitz continuous with respect to $x$, locally with respect to $(s,\xi)$ and not necessarily globally, that is, the Lipschitz constant is not uniform for $(s,\xi)\in R \times R^{n}$. This is an improvement of (c) of Serrin’s Theorem 1.1 since, when only the gradient $\nabla_{x}f$ exists and is continuous, this implies the Lipschitz continuity of $f$ with respect to $x$ on the compact subsets of $\Omega\times R \times R^{n}$.\
Then a question arises that whether there are weaker enough conditions more than locally Lipschitz continuous condition? In this paper, we consider absolutely continuous condition. Obviously, absolute continuity is weaker than Lipschitz continuity. Is the local absolute continuity condition on the integrand enough for the lower semicontinuity of the variational functional? The following theorems give a confirmed answer.\
[**Theorem 1.4** ]{} Let $\Omega \subset R$ be an open set, $f(x,s,\xi):\Omega\times R\times R\longrightarrow[0,+\infty)$ satisfy the following conditions:\
(H1) $f(x,s,\xi) $ is continuous on $\Omega\times R\times R$, $f(x,s,\xi)$ is convex in $\xi \in R$ for all $(x,s)\in \Omega\times R$;\
(H2) $f_{\xi}(x,s,\xi) $ is continuous on $\Omega\times R\times R$, and for every compact set of $\Omega\times R\times R$, $f_{\xi}(x,s,\xi) $ is absolutely continuous about $x$;\
(H3) for every compact set $K_{1}\subseteq\Omega\times R$, there exists a constant $L_{1}=L_{1}(K_{1})$, such that\
$$|f_{\xi}|\leq L_{1}, \ \forall(x,s)\in K_{1},\ \ \forall \xi\in
R,\label{(1.7)}$$ $$|f_{\xi}(x,s,\xi_{1})-f_{\xi}(x,s,\xi_{2})|\leq
L_{1}|\xi_{1}-\xi_{2}|, \ \forall(x,s)\in K_{1},\ \ \forall
\xi_{1},\xi_{2}\in R.\label{(1.8)}$$ Then the functional $F(u,\Omega)=\int_{\Omega}f(x,u(x),u'(x))dx$ is lower semicontinuous on $W_{loc}^{1,1}(\Omega)$ with respect to the strong convergence in $L_{loc}^{1}(\Omega)$.\
[**Theorem 1.5** ]{} Let $\Omega \subset R$ be an open set, $f(x,s,\xi):\Omega\times R\times R\longrightarrow[0,+\infty)$ satisfy (H1) and the following conditions:\
(H4) for every compact set $\Omega'\times H \times K\subseteq \Omega\times R \times R$, $f(x,s,\xi) $ is absolutely continuous about $x$;\
Then the functional $F(u,\Omega)$ is lower semicontinuous on $W_{loc}^{1,1}(\Omega)$ with respect to the strong convergence in $L_{loc}^{1}(\Omega)$.\
Some Lemmas
===========
In this section, we collect some preliminary definitions and lemmas (see papers \[1,4,8,11,14\]) which will be used in the sequel.\
[**Definition 2.1**]{} Let $\Omega\subset R^n$ be on open set, we denote\
$$L^p_{loc}(\Omega )=\{u: \Omega\rightarrow R|\ \int_{\Omega^{\prime}}|u|^pdx<+\infty
,\forall \Omega^{\prime}\subset\subset\Omega\},$$ and\
$$W^{1,1}_{loc}(\Omega )=\{u|\ u\in L^1_{loc}(\Omega ), Du\in
L^1_{loc}(\Omega )\}$$ [**Remark 2.1**]{} Notice that $u_m\rightarrow u$ in $L^1_{loc}(\Omega )$ implies that $u_m$ converges to $u$ in measure.\
[**Definition 2.2**]{} Let $f: [a,b]\rightarrow R$ be a real function, if $\forall\varepsilon >0, \exists\delta >0$, such that for any finite disjoint open interval $\{(a_i,b_i)\}^n_{i=1}$ on $[a,b]$, when $\sum\limits^n_{i=1}(b_i-a_i)<\delta$, we have $$\sum\limits^n_{i=1}|f(b_i)-f(a_i)|<\varepsilon ,$$ then we call $f(x)$ is a absolutely continuous function on $[a,b]$.\
[**Remark 2.2**]{} If $f(x)$ is Lipschitz continuous on $[a,b]$, then $f(x)$ is absolutely continuous on $[a,b]$.\
[**Lemma 2.1**]{} Let $f(x)$ is a absolutely continuous function on $[a,b]$, then $f(x)$ is almost everywhere differentiable on $[a,b]$ and $f^{\prime}(x)$ is a integrable function on $[a,b]$.\
[**Lemma 2.2**]{}(Lebesgue Dominated convergence theorem) Let $(X,\mathcal{R},\mu)$ be a measure space, $f$ and $\{f_n\}(n\geq
1)$ be measurable functions on $E\in\mathcal{R}$, if\
(1) $\{f_n\}$ is convergence in measure to $f$ on $E$;\
(2) there exists a integrable function $h(x)$ on $E$, such that $$|f_n(x)|\leq h(x),\ \ \ \ a.e. x\in E,$$ then $f(x), f_{n}(x)(n\geq 1)$ are integrable on $E$, and $$\lim\limits_{n\rightarrow +\infty}\int_Ef_n(x)d\mu =\int_Ef(x)d\mu
.$$ [**Lemma 2.3**]{} Let $f(x)$ be a measurable function on $E$, the $f(x)$ is Lebesgue integrable on $E$ if and only if $|f(x)|$ is Lebesgue integrable on $E$, and $$|\int_Ef(x)dx|\leq\int_E|f(x)|dx$$ [**Lemma 2.4**]{} Let $f(x)$ be Lebesgue integrable on $E, then
\forall\varepsilon >0, \exists\delta >0$, for every measurable subset $A$ of $E$, when $m(A)<\delta$, we have $$|\int_Af(x)dx|\leq\int_A|f(x)|dx<\varepsilon .$$ [**Definition 2.3**]{} Let function $\eta (x): R^n\rightarrow
[0,1]$ satisfies $\eta\in C^{\infty}_c(R^n), {\rm supp}(\eta
)\subseteq B(0,1), \eta (-x)=\eta (x)$ and $\int_{R^n}\eta (x)dx=1$. Giving a function $v: \Omega\rightarrow R$ and $\varepsilon>0$, we define the convolution of $v$ with step $\varepsilon$ as $$v_{\varepsilon}(x)=\eta_{\varepsilon}*v(x)=\int_{R^n}\eta_{\varepsilon}(x-y)v(y)dy=\int_{R^n}\eta_{\varepsilon}(y)v(x-y)dy,$$ where $\eta_{\varepsilon}(x)=\varepsilon^{-n}\eta\left(\frac{x}{\varepsilon}\right),
{\rm supp}(\eta )=\overline{\{x\in R^n,|\eta (x)\neq 0\}}.$\
We have the following approximations about the convolution of $v$:\
[**Lemma 2.5$^{[1]}$**]{} Let $\Omega\subset R^n$ be an open set, and a function $v: \Omega\rightarrow R$, then\
(i) If $v\in L^1_{loc}(\Omega )$ and ${\rm
supp}(v)\subset\subset\Omega $, then $v_{\varepsilon}\in C^{\infty}_0(\Omega )$ provided $\varepsilon<dist({\rm
supp}(v),\partial\Omega)$, and $$v_{\varepsilon}\rightarrow v\ {\rm in}\ L^1_{loc}(\Omega )\ {\rm
as}\ \varepsilon\rightarrow 0^{+}.$$ (ii) If $v\in L^p(\Omega )$ where $1\leq p<+\infty $, then $v_{\varepsilon}\in L^{p}(\Omega )$. Also $$v_{\varepsilon}\rightarrow v\ {\rm in}\ L^p_{loc}(\Omega)\ {\rm
as}\ \varepsilon\rightarrow 0^{+}.$$ A function $f: R^n\rightarrow R$ is called convex if for every $x,y\in R^n, \lambda\in (0,1)$, we have $$f(\lambda x+(1-\lambda
)y)\leq\lambda f(x)+(1-\lambda )f(y)$$.
Now, we give some properties about convex functions:\
[**Lemma 2.6$^{[4]}$.**]{} Let $f_i: \Omega\rightarrow R,
\{f_i\}_{i\in N}$ be a sequence of functions ,\
(i) if $f_i$ is convex, then $f=\sup_{i\in N}f_i$ is also convex;\
(ii) if $f_i$ is lower semicontinuous, then $f=\sup_{i\in N}f_i$ is also lower semicontinuous. The following approximation result was proved by De Giorgi$^{[8]}$.\
[**Lemma 2.7$^{[8]}$**]{} Let $U\subseteq R^d$ be an open set and $f: U\times R^n\rightarrow [0,+\infty )$ be a continuous function with compact support on $U$, such that, for every $t\in U,
f(t,\cdot )$ is convex on $R^n$. Then there exists a sequence $\{\alpha_{q}\}^{\infty}_{q=1}\subseteq C^{\infty}_c(R^n),
\alpha_{q}\geq 0, \int_{R^n}\alpha_{q}dx=1, {\rm
supp}(\alpha_{q})\subseteq B(0,1)$. Let $$a_{q}(t)=\int_{R^n}f(t,\xi )\{(n+1)\alpha_{q}(\xi )+<\nabla \alpha_{q}(\xi ),\xi
>\}d\xi ,$$ and $$b_q(t)=-\int_{R^n}f(t,\xi )\nabla \alpha_q(\xi )d\xi .$$ Then $$f_j(t,\xi )=\max\limits_{1\leq q\leq j}\{0,a_q(t)+<b_q(t),\xi
>\},j\in N,$$ satisfy the following results:\
(i) for every $j\in N, f_j: U\times R^n\rightarrow [0,+\infty )$ is a continuous function with compact support on $U$ such that, $\forall t\in U, f_j(t,\cdot )$ is convex on $R^n$. Moreover, $\forall(t,\xi )\in U\times R^n, f_j(t,\xi )\leq f_{j+1}(t,\xi )$ and $$f(t,\xi )=\sup\limits_{j\in N}f_j(t,\xi )$$\
(ii) for every $j\in N$, there exists a constant $M_j>0$, such that, $\forall (t,\xi )\in U\times R^n$, $$|f_j(t,\xi )|\leq M_j(1+|\xi |),$$ and, $\forall t\in U, \forall\xi_1,\xi_2\in R^n.$ $$|f_j(t,\xi_1)-f_j(t,\xi_2)|\leq M_j|\xi_1-\xi_2|.$$
Proof of Theorem 1.4
====================
We will divide into four steps to complete the proof of theorem 1.4.\
[**Step 1:**]{} Let $\{\beta_i(x,s)\}_{i\in N}$ be a sequence of smooth functions satisfying\
(1) there exists a compact set $\Omega^{\prime}\times
H\subset\subset\Omega\times R$, such that $\beta_i(x,s)=0, \forall
(x,s)\in (\Omega\backslash\Omega^{\prime})\times (R\backslash H),$\
(2) for every $i\in N, \beta_i(x,s)\leq\beta_{i+1}(x,s),\forall
(x,s)\in\Omega'\times H$,\
(3) $\lim\limits_{i\rightarrow +\infty}\beta_i(x,s)=1,\forall
(x,s)\in\Omega'\times H$.\
Let $$f_i(x,s,\xi )=\beta_i(x,s)f(x,s,\xi ),\ \ \ \ \ i=1,2,\cdots .$$ It is clear that, for each $i\in N, f_i$ satisfies all the hypothesis in theorem 1.4 and also vanishes if $(x,s)$ is outside $\Omega'\times H$. Thus $$\lim\limits_{i\rightarrow +\infty}f_i(x,s,\xi )=f(x,s,\xi ),\ \ \
\ \forall (x,s,\xi )\in\Omega'\times H\times R,$$ and $$f_i(x,s,\xi )\leq f_{i+1}(x,s,\xi )\leq f(x,s,\xi ),\forall i\in
N, \forall (x,s,\xi )\in\Omega'\times H\times R.$$ By Levi lemma, we have $$\lim\limits_{i\rightarrow
+\infty}\int_{\Omega'}f_i(x,s,\xi
)dx=\int_{\Omega'}f(x,s,\xi )d\xi .$$ Thus, without loss of generality, we can assume that there exists an open set $\Omega'\times H\subset\subset\Omega\times R$, such that $$f(x,s,\xi )=0,\ \ \ \ \forall (x,s,\xi )\in (\Omega
\backslash\Omega')\times (R\backslash H)\times R.\label{(3.1)}$$ Let $u_m, u\in W^{1,1}_{loc}(\Omega )$ such that $u_m\rightarrow u$ in $L^1_{loc}(\Omega )$. We will prove that $$\liminf\limits_{m\rightarrow +\infty} F(u_m,\Omega )\geq
F(u,\Omega ).$$ Without loss of generality, we can assume that $$\liminf\limits_{m\rightarrow +\infty} F(u_m,\Omega
)=\lim\limits_{m\rightarrow +\infty}F(u_m,\Omega )<+\infty .$$ By (3.1), we have $F(u_m,\Omega )=F(u_m,\Omega'), F(u,\Omega
)=F(u,\Omega')$, thus we will only prove the following inequality: $$\lim\limits_{m\rightarrow +\infty}F(u_m,\Omega')\geq
F(u,\Omega').\label{(3.2)}$$ [**Step 2:**]{} Let $\eta_{\varepsilon}\in C^{\infty}_c(R)$ be a mollifier and for $\epsilon>0$,define $$v_{\varepsilon}(x)=\eta_{\varepsilon}*u(x)=\int_{\Omega}\eta_{\varepsilon}(x-y)u(y)dy,\
\ \ \ x\in [\Omega_{\varepsilon}],\label{(3.3)}$$ where $\left[\Omega_{\varepsilon}\right]\triangleq \{x\in\Omega
:{\rm dist}(x,\partial\Omega )>\varepsilon\}$. We have $$\begin{aligned}
[u_{\varepsilon}(x)]'&=&[\eta_{\varepsilon}*u(x)]_x=[\int_{\Omega}\eta_{\varepsilon}(x-y)u(y)dy]_x\nonumber\\
&=&\int_{\Omega}[\eta_{\varepsilon}(x-y)]_xu(y)dy=\int_{\Omega}-[\eta_{\varepsilon}(x-y)]_yu(y)dy\label{(3.4)}\\
&=&\int_{B(x,\varepsilon
)}\eta_{\varepsilon}(x-y)[u(y)]_ydy=[u']_{\varepsilon}(x),\
\ \ \ x\in\Omega_{\varepsilon}.\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ In the following, we denote the derivative of $u_{\varepsilon}$ as $u'_{\varepsilon}$. When $u\in W^{1,1}_{loc}(\Omega )$, we know $u'\in L^1_{loc}(\Omega )$. By Lemma 2.5, we know $u'_{\varepsilon}\in C^{\infty}_0(\Omega )$ and $$u'_{\varepsilon}\rightarrow u'\ {\rm in}\ L^1_{loc}(\Omega )\ {\rm
as}\ \varepsilon\rightarrow 0^{+},\label{(3.5)}$$ i.e., $\forall\delta >0, \ \exists\epsilon>0$, such that $$\int_{\Omega'}|u'_{\varepsilon}-u'|dx<\delta .\label{(3.6)}$$ New we estimate the difference for the integrand values on different points: $$\begin{aligned}
f(x,u_m,u'_m)-f(x,u,u')&=&f(x,u_m,u'_m)-f(x,u_m,u'_{\varepsilon})\nonumber\\
&+&f(x,u_m,u'_{\varepsilon})-f(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})\label{(3.7)}\\
&+&f(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})-f(x,u,u').\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ By the convexity of $f(x,s,\xi )$ with respect to $\xi$, we have $$f(x,u_m,u'_m)-f(x,u_m,u'_{\varepsilon})\geq
f_{\xi}(x,u_m,u'_{\varepsilon})\cdot(u'_m-u'_{\varepsilon}).\label{(3.8)}$$ By (\[(3.8)\]), we have $$\begin{aligned}
f(x,u_m,u'_m)-f(x,u_m,u'_{\varepsilon})&\geq & f_{\xi}(x,u_m,u'_{\varepsilon})\cdot
u'_m-f_{\xi}(x,u_m,u'_{\varepsilon})\cdot u'_{\varepsilon}\nonumber\\
&=&f_{\xi}(x,u_m,u'_{\varepsilon})\cdot
u'_m-f_{\xi}(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})\cdot u'\nonumber\\
&+&f_{\xi}(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})\cdot
u'-f_{\xi}(x,u_m,u'_{\varepsilon})\cdot u'_{\varepsilon}\label{(3.9)}\\
&=&f_{\xi}(x,u_m,u'_{\varepsilon})\cdot
u'_m-f_{\xi}(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})\cdot u'\nonumber\\
&+& f_{\xi}(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})\cdot
(u'-u'_{\varepsilon})\nonumber\\
&+& [f_{\xi}(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})-f_{\xi}(x,u_m,u'_{\varepsilon})]\cdot
u'_{\varepsilon}.\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ By (\[(3.7)\]) and (\[(3.9)\]), we have $$\begin{aligned}
f(x,u_m,u'_m)-f(x,u,u')&\geq & f_{\xi}(x,u_m,u'_{\varepsilon}) \cdot
u'_m-f_{\xi}(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})\cdot u'\nonumber\\
& +&f_{\xi}(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})\cdot
(u'-u'_{\varepsilon})\nonumber\\
&+& [f_{\xi}(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})-f_{\xi}(x,u_m,u'_{\varepsilon})]\cdot
u'_{\varepsilon}\label{(3.10)}\\
&+&f(x,u_m,u'_{\varepsilon})-f(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})\nonumber\\
&+& f(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})-f(x,u,u').\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ This implies $$\begin{aligned}
&&\int_{\Omega'}[f(x,u_m,u'_m)-f(x,u,u')]dx\nonumber\\
&\geq &\int_{\Omega'}[f_{\xi}(x,u_m,u'_{\varepsilon})\cdot
u'_m-f_{\xi}(x,u,u'_{\xi})\cdot
u']dx\nonumber\\
&+&\int_{\Omega'}[f_{\xi}(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})\cdot
(u'-u'_{\varepsilon})]dx \nonumber\\
&+&\int_{\Omega'}[f_{\xi}(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})-f_{\xi}(x,u_m,u'_{\varepsilon})]\cdot
u'_{\varepsilon}dx\label{(3.11)}\\
&+&\int_{\Omega'}[f(x,u_m,u'_{\varepsilon})-f(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})]dx\nonumber\\
&+&\int_{\Omega'}[f(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})-f(x,u,u')]dx.\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ [**Step 3:**]{} Now, we estimate the right side of inequality (\[(3.11)\]).\
By (\[(1.7)\]) and (\[(3.6)\]), we have $$\int_{\Omega'}[f_{\xi}(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})\cdot
(u'-u'_{\varepsilon})]dx\geq
-L_1\int_{\Omega'}|u'-u'_{\varepsilon}|dx\geq
-L_1\delta .\label{(3.12)}$$ Thus $$\lim\limits_{\varepsilon\rightarrow
0}\int_{\Omega'}[f_{\xi}(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})\cdot
(u'-u'_{\varepsilon})]dx\geq 0\label{(3.13)}$$ Since $f(x,s,\xi )$ and $f_{\xi}(x,s,\xi )$ are continuous functions , they are bounded functions on compact subset. By remark 2.1 and Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem, we obtain $$\lim\limits_{m\rightarrow
+\infty}\int_{\Omega'}[f_{\xi}(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})-f_{\xi}(x,u_m,u'_{\varepsilon})]\cdot
u'_{\varepsilon}dx=0,\label{(3.14)}$$ and $$\lim\limits_{m\rightarrow
+\infty}\int_{\Omega'}[f(x,u_m,u'_{\varepsilon})-f(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})]dx=0.\label{(3.15)}$$ Now, we will prove $$\lim\limits_{\varepsilon\rightarrow
0}\int_{\Omega'}[f(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})-f(x,u,u')]dx\geq
0\label{(3.16)}$$ By lemma 2.7, there exists a sequence of non-negative continuous functions $f_j(x,s,\xi )\ (j\in N)$, such that $f_j(x,s,\xi )$ is convex on $\xi$, and $\forall (x,s,\xi )\in\Omega'\times
H\times R$, $$\begin{aligned}
&&f_j(x,s,\xi )\leq f_{j+1}(x,s,\xi ),\label{(3.17)}\\
&&f(x,s,\xi )=\sup\limits_{j\in N}f_j(x,s,\xi ),\label{(3.18)}\\
&&|f_j(x,s,\xi_1)-f_j(x,s,\xi_2)|\leq
M_j|\xi_1-\xi_2|.\label{(3.19)}\end{aligned}$$ By Levi lemma, we obtain $$\lim\limits_{j\rightarrow
+\infty}\int_{\Omega'}f_j(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})dx=\int_{\Omega'}f(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})dx,\label{(3.20)}$$ and $$\lim\limits_{j\rightarrow
+\infty}\int_{\Omega'}f_j(x,u,u')dx=\int_{\Omega'}f(x,u,u')dx.\label{(3.21)}$$ In order to prove (\[(3.16)\]), we only need to prove $$\lim\limits_{\varepsilon\rightarrow
0}\int_{\Omega'}[f_j(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})-f_j(x,u,u')]dx\geq
0,\ \forall j\in N.\label{(3.22)}$$ By (\[(3.20)\]) and (\[(3.21)\]), we have $$\int_{\Omega'}[f_j(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})-f_j(x,u,u')]dx\geq
-M_j\int_{\Omega'}|u'_{\varepsilon}-u'|dx\geq
-M_j \delta .$$ Thus (\[(3.16)\]) holds.\
[**Step 4:**]{} Now, we need to prove $$\lim\limits_{m\rightarrow
+\infty}\int_{\Omega'}[f_{\xi}(x,u_m,u'_{\varepsilon})\cdot
u'_m-f_{\xi}(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})\cdot
u']dx=0. \label{(3.23)}$$
Let $$\begin{aligned}
&&g(x,s)\triangleq
f_{\xi}(x,s,u'_{\varepsilon}),\label{(3.24)}\\
&&G_m(x)\triangleq\int^{u_m(x)}_{u(x)}g(x,s)ds.\label{(3.25)}\end{aligned}$$ By condition $(H_2)$, $ g(x,s)$ is a absolutely continuous function on $x$. By Lemma 2.1, $g(x,s)$ is almost everywhere differentiable, i.e. $\frac{\partial g}{\partial x}$ exists almost everywhere. Derivating the both sides of (\[(3.25)\]), we obtain $$G^{\prime}_m(x)=g(x,u_m)\cdot u'_m-g(x,u)\cdot
u'+\int^{u_m(x)}_{u(x)}\frac{\partial g}{\partial x}dx,\ \ \
\ a.e. x\in\Omega'.\label{(3.26)}$$ Because $G_m(x)$ vanishes outside $\Omega'$, we obtain $$\int_{\Omega'}G^{\prime}_m(x)dx=0. \label{(3.27)}$$ By (\[(3.26)\]), we have $$\begin{aligned}
&&|\int_{\Omega'}[f_{\xi}(x,u_m,u'_{\varepsilon})\cdot
u'_m-f_{\xi}(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})\cdot
u']dx|\nonumber\\
&=&\left|\int_{\Omega'}[g(x,u_m)\cdot
u'_m-g(x,u)\cdot
u']dx\right|\label{(3.28)}\\
&=&|-\int_{\Omega'}\int^{u_m(x)}_{u(x)}\frac{\partial
g}{\partial x}dsdx|\leq\int_{D_m}\left|\frac{\partial g}{\partial
x}\right|dxds, \nonumber\end{aligned}$$ where $$D_m=\{(x,s)\in\Omega'\times H|\ \min\{u_m(x),u(x)\}\leq
s(x)\leq\max\{u_m(x),u(x)\}\}.$$ We note $$|D_m|=|\int_{\Omega'}\int^{u_m}_udsdx|\leq\int_{\Omega'}|u_m-u|dx\rightarrow
0\ (m\rightarrow +\infty ).\label{(3.29)}$$ By Fubini theorem, we have $$\int_{\Omega\times R}|\frac{\partial g}{\partial
x}|dxds=\int_Hds\int_{\Omega'}\left|\frac{\partial
g}{\partial x}\right|dx\label{(3.30)}$$ Since $g(x,s)$ is absolutely continuous about $x$, $\frac{\partial
g}{\partial x}$ is integrable and absolutely integrable, i.e. $$\int_{\Omega'}\left|\frac{\partial g}{\partial
x}\right|dx<+\infty .\label{(3.31)}$$ Thus $$\int_{\Omega\times R}\left|\frac{\partial g}{\partial
x}\right|dxds<+\infty\label{(3.32)}$$ Because of the absolute continuity of integral, we have $$\lim\limits_{m\rightarrow +\infty}\int_{D_m}\left|\frac{\partial
g}{\partial x}\right|dxds=0\label{(3.33)}$$ By (\[(3.28)\]), we obtain $$\lim\limits_{m\rightarrow
+\infty}|\int_{\Omega'}[f_{\xi}(x,u_m,u'_{\varepsilon})\cdot
u'_m-f_{\xi}(x,u,u'_{\varepsilon})\cdot
u']dx|=0\label{(3.34)}$$ Thus we have proved (\[(3.23)\]). By (\[(3.13)\])-(\[(3.16)\]) and (\[(3.23)\]), we have $$\lim\limits_{m\rightarrow
+\infty}\int_{\Omega'}[f(x,u_m,u'_m)-f(x,u,u')]dx\geq
0\label{(3.35)}$$ Thus we deduce that the functional $F(u,\Omega )$ is lower semicontinuous on $W^{1,1}_{loc}(\Omega )$ with respect to the strong convergence in $L^1_{loc}(\Omega )$, which does complete the proof.\
Proof of Theorem 1.5
====================
In order to prove Theorem 1.5, we will verify all the conditions in Theorem 1.4 from the assumptions in Theorem 1.5. Now we will divide into four steps to complete the proof of Theorem 1.5:\
[**Step 1:**]{} Similar to the first step of the proof in Theorem 1.4, without loss of generality, we assume that the integrand $f(x,s,\xi)$ vanishes outside a compact subset of $\Omega\times
R$. Thus we assume that there exists an open set $\Omega'\times
H\subset\subset\Omega\times R$, such that $$f(x,s,\xi )\equiv 0,\ \ \ \ \forall (x,s,\xi )\in
(\Omega\backslash\Omega')\times (R\backslash H)\times
R.\label{(4.1)}$$ Let $u_m,u\in W^{1,1}_{loc}(\Omega )$, such that $u_m\rightarrow u$ in $L^1_{loc}(\Omega )$, we need to prove $$\lim\limits_{m\rightarrow +\infty}F(u_m,\Omega')\geq
F(u,\Omega').\label{(4.2)}$$ By lemma 2.7, there exists a functions sequence $\{f_j(x,s,\xi
)\}_{j\in N}$, such that $\forall j\in N$, $f_j$ is a continuous function on $\Omega'\times H\subset\subset\Omega\times R$; $\forall (x,s)\in\Omega'\times H$, $f_j(x,s,\cdot )$ is convex on $R$, and $\forall (x,s,\xi )\in\Omega'\times H\times R$, $$\begin{aligned}
&&f_j(x,s,\xi )\leq f_{j+1}(x,s,\xi )\label{(4.3)}\\
&&f(x,s,\xi )=\sup\limits_{j\in N}f_j(x,s,\xi )\label{(4.4)}\\
&&|f_j(x,s,\xi_1)-f_j(x,s,\xi_2)|\leq
M_j|\xi_1-\xi_2|,(x,s)\in\Omega'\times H, \xi_1,\xi_2\in
R.\label{(4.5)}\end{aligned}$$
Let $\eta_{\varepsilon}\in C^{\infty}_c(R)(0<\varepsilon <<1)$ be a mollifier and define the $f_{j,\varepsilon}=f_j*\eta_{\varepsilon}$, i.e. $$f_{j,\varepsilon}(x,s,\xi )=\int_Rf_j(x,s,\xi
-z)\eta_{\varepsilon}(z)dz.\label{(4.6)}$$ By (\[(4.5)\]), we have $$\begin{aligned}
&&|f_{j,\varepsilon}(x,s,\xi )-f_j(x,s,\xi )|\nonumber\\
&=&|\int_Rf_j(x,s,\xi -z)\eta_{\varepsilon}(z)dz-\int_Rf_j(x,s,\xi
)\eta_{\varepsilon}(z)dz|\nonumber\\
&\leq&\int_R|f_j(x,s,\xi -z)-f_j(x,s,\xi
)|\eta_{\varepsilon}(z)dz\label{(4.7)}\\
&\leq&\int_{{\rm
supp}\eta_{\varepsilon}}M_j|z|\cdot\eta_{\varepsilon}(z)dz\leq
M_j\cdot\varepsilon. \nonumber\end{aligned}$$ Choosing $\varepsilon =\varepsilon_j=\frac{1}{jM_j}\rightarrow 0$. By (\[(4.7)\]), we have $$|f_{j,\varepsilon_j}(x,s,\xi
)-f_j(x,s,\xi )|\leq M_j\varepsilon_j=\frac{1}{j}.\label{(4.8)}$$ So $$f_j(x,s,\xi )-\frac{2}{j}\leq f_{j,\varepsilon_j}(x,s,\xi
)-\frac{1}{j}\leq f_j(x,s,\xi )\leq f(x,s,\xi )\label{(4.9)}$$ By (\[(4.3)\]), (\[(4.4)\]) and Levi lemma, we have $$\lim\limits_{i\rightarrow
+\infty}\int_{\Omega'}f_j(x,u(x),u'(x))dx=\int_{\Omega'}f(x,u(x),u'(x))dx.\label{(4.10)}$$ Denote $$F_j(u,\Omega')=\int_{\Omega'}[f_{j,\varepsilon_j}(x,u(x),u'(x))-\frac{1}{j}]dx\label{(4.11)}$$ By (\[(4.9)\])-(\[(4.11)\]), we have $$\lim\limits_{j\rightarrow +\infty}F_j(u,\Omega')=F(u,\Omega'
)=\int_{\Omega'}f(x,u(x),u'(x))dx.\label{(4.12)}$$ Obviously, $$F_j(u,\Omega')\leq F(u,\Omega'),\ \ \ \ \forall
j\in N.$$ Thus $$\sup\limits_{j\in
N}F_j(u,\Omega')=F(u,\Omega').\label{(4.13)}$$ By Lemma 2.6, in order to prove that $F(u,\Omega')$ is lower semicontinuous on $W^{1,1}_{loc}(\Omega )$ with respect to the strong convergence in $L^{\prime}_{loc}(\Omega )$, it’s enough that we prove lower semicontinuity with respect to the strong convergence in $L^1_{loc}(\Omega )$ for the functional sequence $\{F_j(u,\Omega')\}_{j\in N}$ on $W^{1,1}_{loc}(\Omega )$ .\
[**Step 2:**]{} In order to prove that $\forall j\in N,
F_j(u,\Omega')$ is lower semicontinuous on $W^{1,1}_{loc}(\Omega )$ with respect to the strong convergence in $L^1_{loc}(\Omega )$, we will prove that $\forall j\in N$, the integrand $f_{j,\varepsilon_j}(x,u(x),u'(x))$ satisfy all conditions of theorem 1.4.\
$\forall\xi_1,\xi_2\in R, 0<\lambda <1$, by the convexity of $f_j(x,s,\cdot )$ on $R$, we have $$f_j(x,s,\lambda\xi_1+(1-\lambda )\xi_2)\leq\lambda
f_j(x,s,\xi_1)+(1-\lambda )f_j(x,s,\xi_2).\label{(4.14)}$$ Thus $$\begin{aligned}
&&f_{j,\varepsilon_j}(x,s,\lambda\xi_1+(1-\lambda )\xi_2)\nonumber\\
&=&\int_Rf_j(x,s,\lambda\xi_1+(1-\lambda
)\xi_2-z)\eta_{\varepsilon_j}(z)dz\nonumber\\
&=&\int_Rf_j(x,s,\lambda (\xi_1-z)+(1-\lambda
)(\xi_2-z))\cdot\eta_{\varepsilon_j}(z)dz\label{(4.15)}\\
&\leq&\lambda\int_Rf_j(x,s,(\xi_1-z))\cdot\eta_{\varepsilon_j}(z)dz+(1-\lambda
)\int_Rf_j(x,s,(\xi_2-z))\cdot\eta_{\varepsilon_j}(z)dz\nonumber\\
&=&\lambda f_{j,\varepsilon_j}(x,s,\xi_1)+(1-\lambda
)f_{j,\varepsilon_j}(x,s,\xi_2).\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ Thus $f_{j,\varepsilon_j}$ satisfy $(H_1)$.\
[**Step 3:**]{} $\forall (x,s)\in\Omega'\times H, \xi_1,\xi_2\in
R$, by (\[(4.5)\]), we have $$\begin{aligned}
&&|f_{j,\varepsilon_j}(x,s,\xi_1)-f_{j,\varepsilon_j}(x,s,\xi_2)|\nonumber\\
&=&|\int_R[f_j(x,s,\xi_1-z)\eta_{\varepsilon_j}(z)-f_j(x,s,\xi_{2}-z)\eta_{\varepsilon_j}(z)]dz|\nonumber\\
&\leq&\int_R|f_j(x,s,\xi_1-z)-f_j(x,s,\xi_2-z)|\cdot\eta_{\varepsilon_j}(z)dz\label{(4.16)}\\
&\leq&\int_{{\rm
supp}\eta_{\varepsilon}}M_j|\xi_1-\xi_2|\eta_{\varepsilon_j}(z)dz\leq
M_j|\xi_1-\xi_2|.\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ Thus $$\left|\frac{\partial f_{j,\varepsilon_j}}{\partial\xi}\right|\leq
M_j.\label{(4.17)}$$ So $f_{j,\varepsilon_j}$ satisfies (1.7) in the condition (H3) of Theorem 1.4.\
Now, we will prove $f_{j,\varepsilon_j}$ satisfies (1.8) in the condition (H3) of Theorem 1.4. By ${\rm
supp}(\eta_{\varepsilon_j})\subseteq B(0,\varepsilon_j)$,we have
$$\begin{aligned}
\frac{\partial f_{j,\varepsilon_j}}{\partial\xi}(x,s,\xi
)&=&\int_R\frac{\partial f_j(x,s,\xi
-z)}{\partial\xi}\cdot\eta_{\varepsilon_j}(z)dz\nonumber\\
&=&-\int_R\frac{\partial f_j(x,s,\xi -z)}{\partial
z}\cdot\eta_{\varepsilon_j}(z)dz\label{(4.18)}\\
&=&\int_Rf_j(x,s,\xi
-z)\frac{\partial\eta_{\varepsilon_j}(z)}{\partial
z}dz.\nonumber\end{aligned}$$
By (\[(4.5)\]) and (\[(4.18)\]), we have $$\begin{aligned}
&&\left|\frac{\partial
f_{j,\varepsilon_j}}{\partial\xi}(x,s,\xi_1)-\frac{\partial
f_{j,\varepsilon_j}}{\partial\xi}(x,s,\xi_2)\right|\nonumber\\
&\leq&\int_R\left|f_j(x,s,\xi_1-z)-f_j(x,s,\xi_2-z)\right|\cdot\left|\frac{\partial\eta_{\varepsilon_j}(z)}{\partial
z}\right|dz\label{(4.19)}\\
&\leq&M_j|\xi_1-\xi_2|\cdot\int_R\left|\frac{\partial\eta_{\varepsilon_j}(z)}{\partial
z}\right|dz=L_jM_j|\xi_1-\xi_2|,\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ where $$L_j=\int_R\left|\frac{\partial\eta_{\varepsilon_j}(z)}{\partial
z}\right|dz\label{(4.20)}$$ is a constant depending on $\varepsilon_j$. Thus $f_{j,\varepsilon_j}$ satisfies (1.8). So we have proved that $f_{j,\varepsilon_j}$ satisfies $(H_3)$.\
[**Step 4:**]{} Next we will prove that $f_{j,\varepsilon_j}$ satisfies condition $(H2)$.\
By the condition $(H4)$, for every compact subset $\Omega'\times H\times K$, $f(x,s,\xi )$ is absolutely continuous about $x$, i.e. $\forall\varepsilon_0>0,\ \exists\delta >0$ such that for any finite disjoint open interval $\{(x_i,y_j)\}^n_{i=1}$ in $\Omega'$, when $\Sigma^n_{i=1}(y_i-x_i)<\delta$, we have $$\sum\limits^n_{i=1}|f(y_i,s,\xi )-f(x_i,s,\xi
)|<\varepsilon_0\label{(4.21)}$$ By Lemma 2.7, there exists continuous functions sequence $\{f_j(x,s,\xi )\}_{i\in N}$, $\forall j\in N$, $\forall
(x,s)\in\Omega'\times H, \ f_j(x,s,\cdot )$ is convex on $R$, and $\forall (x,s,\xi )\in\Omega'\times H\times R$, we have $$f_j(x,s,\xi )=\max\limits_{1\leq q\leq
j}\{0,a_q(x,s)+b_q(x,s)\xi\},\ j\in N.\label{(4.22)}$$ where $$\begin{aligned}
&&a_q(x,s)=\int_Rf(x,s,\xi )\left[2\eta_q(\xi
)+\xi\frac{\partial\eta_q(\xi )}{\partial\xi}\right]d\xi
,\label{(4.23)}\\
&&b_q(x,s)=-\int_Rf(x,s,\xi )\frac{\partial\eta_q(\xi
)}{\partial\xi}d\xi ,\label{(4.24)}\end{aligned}$$ and $\eta_q\in C^{\infty}_c(R)\ (q\in N)$ are mollifiers satisfying $\eta_q\geq 0, \ \int_R\eta_q(\xi )d\xi =1$ and ${\rm
supp}(\eta_q)\subseteq B(0,1)$, $\forall j\in N$. By (\[(4.22)\]), without of loss generality, we assume that there exists $l\in \{1,\cdots,j\}$, such that $$f_j(x,s,\xi )=a_l(x,s)+b_l(x,s)\cdot\xi\label{(4.25)}$$ where $a_l,b_l$ are given by (\[(4.23)\])-(\[(4.24)\]). By (\[(4.21)\]), we obtain $$\begin{aligned}
&&\sum\limits^n_{i=1}|a_l(y_i,s)-a_l(x_i,s)|\nonumber\\
&=&\sum\limits^n_{i=1}|\int_R[f(y_i,s,\xi )-f(x_i,s,\xi )]\cdot
[2\eta_l(\xi )+\xi\frac{\partial\eta_l(\xi )}{\partial\xi}]d\xi
|\nonumber\\
&\leq&\int_R\sum\limits^n_{i=1}|f(y_i,s,\xi )-f(x_i,s,\xi )|\cdot
[2\eta_l(\xi )+|\xi\frac{\partial\eta_l(\xi
)}{\partial\xi}|]d\xi\label{(4.26)}\\
&\leq&\varepsilon_0\int_{B(0,1)}[2\eta_l(\xi
)+|\xi\frac{\partial\eta_l(\xi )}{\partial\xi}|]d\xi\leq
(2+A_l)\cdot\varepsilon_0,\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ where $$A_l=\int_{B(0,1)}|\frac{\partial\eta_l(\xi
)}{\partial\xi}|d\xi$$ is a constant. Similar to the above proof, we have $$\begin{aligned}
&&\sum\limits^n_{i=1}|b_l(y_i,s)-b_l(x_i,s)|\nonumber\\
&=&\sum\limits^n_{i=1}|\int_R[f(y_i,s,\xi )-f(x_i,s,\xi
)]\cdot\frac{\partial\eta_l(\xi )}{\partial\xi}d\xi
|\nonumber\\
&\leq&\int_R\sum\limits^n_{i=1}|f(y_i,s,\xi )-f(x_i,s,\xi
)|\cdot\left|\frac{\partial\eta_l(\xi
)}{\partial\xi}\right|d\xi\label{(4.27)}\\
&\leq&\varepsilon_0\int_{B(0,1)}\left|\frac{\partial\eta_l(\xi
)}{\partial\xi}\right|d\xi\leq A_l\cdot\varepsilon_0.\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ Thus $$\begin{aligned}
&&\sum\limits^n_{i=1}|f_j(y_i,s,\xi
)-f_j(x_i,s,\xi )|\nonumber\\
&=&\sum\limits^n_{i=1}|a_l(y_i,s)-a_l(x_i,s)+[b_l(y_i,s)-b_l(x_i,s)]\cdot\xi
|\nonumber\\
&\leq&\sum\limits^n_{i=1}|a_l(y_i,s)-a_l(x_i,s)|+\sum\limits^n_{i=1}|b_l(y_i,s)-b_l(x_i,s)|\cdot
|\xi |\label{(4.28)}\\
&\leq&(2+A_l)\varepsilon_0+A_l\varepsilon_0K_1=(2+A_l+A_lK_1)\varepsilon_0\triangleq\sigma.\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ Since $\xi$ varies on a compact set, then $K_1=\sup\limits_{\xi}\{|\xi |\}<+\infty$. Choosing $\varepsilon_0$ sufficient small so that $\sigma$ is enough small. Thus $f_j(x,s,\xi )$ is absolutely continuous about $x$ on any compact subset of $\Omega\times R\times R$. By (\[(4.6)\]) and (\[(4.28)\]), we have $$\begin{aligned}
&&\sum\limits^n_{i=1}|f_{j,\varepsilon_j}(y_i,s,\xi
)-f_{j,\varepsilon_j}(x_i,s,\xi
)|\nonumber\\
&=&\sum\limits^n_{i=1}\left|\int_R[f_j(y_i,s,\xi
-z)\eta_{\varepsilon_j}(z)-f_j(x_i,s,\xi-
z)\eta_{\varepsilon_j}(z)]dz\right|\nonumber\\
&\leq&\int_R\sum\limits^n_{i=1}|f_j(y_i,s,\xi -z)-f_j(x_i,s,\xi
-z)|\cdot\eta_{\varepsilon_j}(z)dz\label{(4.29)}\\
&\leq&\sigma\cdot\int_{B(0,\varepsilon_j)}\eta_{\varepsilon_j}(z)dz=\sigma
.\nonumber \end{aligned}$$ By (\[(4.18)\]) and (\[(4.29)\]), we obtain $$\begin{aligned}
&&\sum\limits^n_{i=1}\left|\frac{\partial
f_{j,\varepsilon_j}}{\partial\xi}(y_i,s,\xi)-\frac{\partial
f_{j,\varepsilon_j}}{\partial\xi}(x_i,s,\xi)\right|\nonumber\\
&\leq&\int_R\sum\limits^n_{i=1}|f_j(y_i,s,\xi -z)-f_j(x_i,s,\xi
-z)|\cdot\left|\frac{\partial\eta_{\varepsilon_j}(z)}{\partial
z}\right|dz\label{(4.30)}\\
&\leq&\sigma\int_R\left|\frac{\partial\eta_{\varepsilon_j(z)}}{\partial
z}\right|dz=L_j\sigma\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ where $L_j$ are constants depending on $\varepsilon_j$ and given by (\[(4.20)\]) ($\forall j\in N$). By (\[(4.30)\]), for every compact subset on $\Omega\times R\times R, \frac{\partial
f_{j,\varepsilon_j}}{\partial\xi}$ is absolutely continuous about $x$. Thus $f_{j,\varepsilon_j}$ satisfy condition $(H_2)$.
Now,we have proved $f_{j,\varepsilon_j}$ satisfies all conditions in Theorem 1.4, so $F_j(u,\Omega')$ is lower semicontinuous in $W^{1,1}_{loc}(\Omega )$ with respect to the strong convergence in $L^1_{loc}(\Omega )$. Thus $F(u,\Omega )$ has the same lower semicontinuity. This completes the proof of Theorem 1.5.\
Adams R.A.,Fournier J.F., Sobolev space. 2nd Ed,Academic press,2003. Ambrosio,L., Fusco,N., Pallara,D., Functions of bounded variation and free discontinuity problems, Oxford University Press, Inc. New York, 2000. Cicco,V.De, Leoni,G., A chain rule in $L^{1}(div;\Omega)$ and its applications to lower semicontinuity, Calculus of Variations, 2003,19: 23-51. Ekeland,I., Témam,R., Convex analysis and variational problems, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1976. Evans,L.C., Partial Differential Equations, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1998. Fonseca,I., Leoni,G., Some remarks on lower semicontinuity, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 2000,49: 617-635. Fonseca,I., Leoni,G., On lower semicontinuity and relaxation, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 2001,131A: 519-565. Giorgi,E.De, Teoremi di semicontinuit’a nel calcolo delle variazioni, Istituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica, Roma, 1968. Gori,M., Marcellini,P., An extension of the Serrin¡¯s lower semicontinuity theorem, J. Convex Analysis 2002,9: 475-502. Gori,M., Maggi,F., Marcellini,P., On some sharp conditions for lower semicontinuity in L1, Differential and Integral Equations, 2003,16(1): 51-76. Jean B.,Hiriart U.,Claude, Fundametals of convex analysis.Springer,2001. Pauc C.Y., La M¨¦thode mtrique en calcul des variations. Hermann, Paris,1941. Serrin,J., On the definition and properties of certain variational integrals, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 1961,101: 139-167. Stein E. M., Shakarchi R., Real analysis. Princeton University Press,2005.
[^1]: Corresponding author: [email protected] and [email protected]
[^2]: Supported partially by NSF of China.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'The domain name system (DNS) is one of the most important components of today’s Internet, and is the standard naming convention between human-readable domain names and machine-routable IP addresses of Internet resources. However, due to the vulnerability of DNS to various threats, its security and functionality have been continuously challenged over the course of time. Although, researchers have addressed various aspects of the DNS in the literature, there are still many challenges yet to be addressed. In order to comprehensively understand the root causes of the vulnerabilities of DNS, it is mandatory to review the various activities in the research community on DNS landscape. To this end, this paper surveys more than 170 peer reviewed papers, which are published in both top conferences and journals in last ten years, and summarizes vulnerabilities in DNS and corresponding countermeasures. This paper not only focuses on the DNS threat landscape and existing challenges, but also discusses the utilized data analysis methods, which are frequently used to address DNS threat vulnerabilities. Furthermore, we looked into the DNS threat landscape from the view point of the involved entities in the DNS infrastructure in an attempt to point out more vulnerable entities in the system.'
address: University of Central Florida
author:
- Aminollah Khormali
- Jeman Park
- Hisham Alasmary
- Afsah Anwar
- David Mohaisen
bibliography:
- 'amin.bib'
- 'conf.bib'
title: 'Domain Name System Security and Privacy: A Contemporary Survey'
---
0
Introduction
============
The Domain Name System (DNS) is one of the pillars of the operation of the Internet, the medium on which most of communications are today transported. Among other purposes, DNS is used today widely for domain names to translate them into Internet Protocol (IP) addresses. The domain name system maps a name that people use to locate a website to the IP address that a computer uses to locate that website. For example, if a user types www.example.com into a web browser, a server behind the scenes will map that name to an IP address, e.g., [1.2.3.4]{}, corresponding to that domain. Web browsing and most other Internet activities, e.g., transferring files, rely on DNS to quickly provide the information necessary to connect users to remote hosts. DNS mapping is distributed throughout the Internet in a hierarchy of authorities.
Based on the key role of the DNS in networking infrastructure, attackers are aggressively looking for new ways to compromise the DNS infrastructure. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the evolution of DNS security and the associated issues to preserve reliable and secure services, and to improve the security of DNS through various iterations of design revisions. Indeed, recently, researchers from academia and industry have focused on improving the design of DNS by allowing various necessary options, and by revising its assumptions of operation. However, the constant evolution of DNS, as well as the rise of new detrimental and unconventional issues, such as pervasive adversaries, privacy risks, and new and advanced forms of attacks, make the functionality, security, and privacy of DNS important issues that require continued attention and investigation. To this end, surveying, summarizing, and categorizing the body of work on DNS security and privacy is an important endeavor that is lacking in the existing literature. This effort is necessary to guide the community to what is an open problem that requires further attention.
Particularly, despite the large number of works in the literature on DNS security and privacy, existing contributions are scattered across different research areas and a comprehensive yet concise survey is lacking. Although there exist several surveys in the field of DNS [@ZouZPPLL16; @KangSM16; @TorabiBAD18; @ZhauniarovichKYD18; @SpauldingUM16], they are limited from several points of view. First, the scope of those works is narrow, e.g., covering only a certain aspect of the DNS ecosystem, such as detecting Internet abuse by analyzing passive DNS traffic [@TorabiBAD18], malicious domain detection through DNS data analysis [@ZhauniarovichKYD18], and investigating the domain name squatting ecosystem [@SpauldingUM16]. Second, the number of studies covered in each of those prior works—even on the very well accepted set of problems in the field of DNS security and privacy—is limited, and does not cover the most recent advances, which require further attention and consideration—especially in an evolving domain [@ZouZPPLL16; @SpauldingUM16].
{width="90.00000%"}
To this end, this survey fills the gap in the literature by putting together an up-to-date summary of research works that cover various aspects of the DNS ecosystem and associated security and privacy issues—and all in one place. Toward this goal, we have surveyed a wide range of research works from various points of view, including the DNS threat landscape, DNS research methods, and DNS research scopes.
The general outline of the survey, highlighting the road map towards the key terms and directions, is shown in . In the following we briefly review some of those broad directions.
DNS Threat Landscape
--------------------
A central component of this work is DNS threat landscape. By reviewing the threats, we primarily focus on the common challenges in security and privacy of DNS infrastructure. Such threats may not only compromise the security and privacy of end-users, but may also undermine the performance and availability of Internet services that heavily rely on DNS for their operation. We demonstrate such an interdependence through various practical and challenging attacks and efforts in the literature to defend against them. For example, attackers abuse the functionality of open DNS resolvers to transfer a small number of DNS queries into significantly large payload coordinated at a target server or network, thus making the server inaccessible, in what is known as amplification attacks. Despite the large body of research works on detection and mitigation of *DNS amplification attacks* [@AizuddinANNAA17; @ballaniF16; @KimLCAJK17; @HerzbergS14; @MacFarlandSK15; @PerdisciCG12; @TruongC16; @VermaHHHRKF16; @zheng2018realtime], such attacks still compromise today’s Internet, according to *Nexusguard’s* 2018 threat report of Q1 [@Nexusguard18].
Another example we highlight is cache poisoning; DNS resolver cache can be compromised through the insertion of unauthorized domain names and IP addresses in order to redirect users to malicious IP addresses. Consequently, by launching this attack an adversary can compromise the performance of Internet services and distribute malicious contents, such as malware, spam, credentials theft, phishing contents, among many others. There exist several research works that attempted to address *DNS cache poisoning attacks* [@ShulmanW14; @AntonakakisDLPLB10; @ChenMP15; @PerdisciALL09; @WuDZW15; @ChenAPNDL14; @HaoW17] using different methods, such as DNSSEC [@HerzbergS12; @ShulmanW14], WSEC DNS [@PerdisciALL09], ECO-DNS [@ChenMP15], and Anax [@AntonakakisDLPLB10], among others, which we outline this study.
Attackers also utilize *botnets* that allow them to access devices through propagation and coordinate among them using C&C channels to perform wide variety of malicious activities, such as Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack [@rustock], amplification attacks, and credentials stealing, among many others [@riccardi2013titans]. DNS plays an essential role in the operation of botnets by providing easily deploy-able C&C channel. Although various research works have studied botnets and possible solutions to defend against their attacks [@jinYGY2015; @JiangLLLDW12; @TruongC16; @PlohmannYKBG16; @XuBSY13], including marginalizing DNS infrastructure used for this attack. However, such attacks are still on the rise, compromising users’ security. Specifically, the emergence and rise of IoT and associated vulnerabilities opened new directions, whereby attack vectors facilitated by DNS’ reliability and deployment played a crucial role in those attacks. For example, the Mirai botnet attacks IoT devices, such as routers and video recorders [@whittaker_2016; @palmer_2018], and uses them for amplification attacks, necessitating security solutions optimized for IoT and its interplay with DNS [@kolias2017ddos; @bertino2017botnets].
*DNS manipulation* may expose users to multiple threats, such as phishing and malicious domains. Accordingly, a large number of studies considered DNS manipulation [@WeaverKNP11; @SchompCRA14; @KuhrerHBRH15; @PearceJLEFWP17; @TrevisanDMM17], and its interplay with the detection and mitigation of *phishing attacks* [@BilgeKKB11; @DagonPLL08; @KintisMLCGPNA17; @CookGD08; @MedvetKK08; @HaraYM09]. Despite this large number of studies, phishing and associated DNS manipulation is still a challenging and expanding area. Phishers are targeting mobile messaging and social apps at an increasing rate [@wandera_2018], highlighting the need for further investigation and defenses.
A large body of research has been devoted to the detection of *malicious domain names* [@AntonakakisPDLF10; @AntonakakisPLVD11; @BilgeKKB11; @BilgeSBKK14; @CanaliCVK11; @FelegyhaziKP10; @GaoYCPGJD13; @HaoKMPF16; @HaoTPFKGH13; @jinYGY2015; @KhalilGNY18; @LuoTZSLNM15; @MaSSV09; @HaoFP11; @LiuLDWLD17], which can be classified into two general categories: classification based [@AntonakakisPDLF10; @AntonakakisPLVD11; @BilgeKKB11; @BilgeSBKK14; @jinYGY2015] and inference based [@KhalilGNY18; @GaoYCPGJD13; @LuoTZSLNM15; @LiuLDWLD17] methods. Classification-based methods rely on local network and host information. The inference-based methods exploit global information along with local information of domains.
Domain Generation Algorithms (DGAs) are utilized to intermittently produce a large number of domain names for malicious purposes. There exist several research works that explored the ecosystem of DGAs [@YadavRRR10; @AntonakakisPNVALD12; @baraboschWLG12; @PlohmannYKBG16; @TruongC16; @SpauldingPKM18].
Furthermore, another type of threat is *domain name squatting*, where cybersquatters register variants of popular trademark names through different squatting strategies, has been considered. Such attacks include various variants, i.e. typosquatting [@DWangBWVD06; @BanerjeeBFB08; @SpauldingUM16; @AgtenJPN15; @SzurdiKCSFK14; @KhanHLK15; @SpauldingNM17; @SpauldingUM17], bitsquatting [@Dinaburg; @NikiforakisAMDPJ13; @VissersBGJN17], combosquatting [@KintisMLCGPNA17], and soundsquatting [@NikiforakisBDPJ14]. Domain name squatting becomes popular as an attack vector to start many other types of attacks [@SzurdiKCSFK14; @AgtenJPN15]. Related to this is domain monetization through parking; despite technically being a legitimate business, *parked domain monetization* can often lead to and get mixed with other practices, i.e. click fraud, as well as traffic spam and traffic stealing—which usually lead to serving malicious content i.e. malware and spam [@AlrwaisYALW14; @SzurdiKCSFK14; @WeaverKP11; @VissersJN15]. All of these threats may compromise the security and privacy of DNS landscape and users. There are large amount of research regarding *privacy leakage* and various solutions have been proposed, such as EncDNS [@HerrmannFLF14], PPDNS [@LuT10], DLV [@MohaisenGR17], [[etc.]{}]{}However,
[[Research Methods.]{}]{} Another vertical of our survey is the DNS research methods used in the literature, and their associated work. In exploring the DNS research methods, we have investigated various data analysis methods, which have been utilized to detect, model, and mitigate the aforementioned DNS threats. First, we describe two main *DNS data collection methods* utilized in the literature and the associated works, including *passive DNS data (PDNS)* [@AlrwaisLMWWQBM17; @AntonakakisPLVD11; @CallahanAR13; @Tajalizadehkhoob17a; @KountourasKLCND16; @TruongC16; @PerdisciCG12; @LiAXYW13; @BilgeSBKK14; @KintisMLCGPNA17; @KhanHLK15; @HaoW17; @GaoYCPGJD13] and *Active DNS data (ADNS)* [@KhanHLK15; @KountourasKLCND16; @VanJSP16; @KhalilGNY18; @KintisMLCGPNA17; @ChungR0CLMMW17]. Next, we categorize the research works based on the common *DNS data analysis techniques* that have been used in the literature, such as *machine learning* algorithms [@AlrwaisLMWWQBM17; @AntonakakisDLPLB10; @AntonakakisPDLF10; @HaoTPFKGH13; @HaoW17; @KhalilGNY18; @LuoTZSLNM15; @MaSSV09; @RadwanH17; @RahbariniaPA15; @ShulmanW15; @VissersJN15] and *association analysis* [@YadavRRR10; @Tajalizadehkhoob17a; @HockK16; @KhalilGNY18; @GomezNA17]. Finally, we categorize the research works based on their scope of analysis and from security point of view into *vanilla DNS* [@SchompCRA14; @DagonPLL08; @XuBSY13; @JacksonBBSB09; @SchompAR14; @DagonAVJL08; @ChenMP15] and *DNSSEC* [@AdrichemBLWWFK15; @BabuP18; @BauM10; @ChungR0CLMMW17; @ChungRCLMMW17; @HerzbergS13; @HerzbergS12; @HerzbergS14; @JalalzaiSI15].
DNS Entities Scopes
-------------------
We categorize the literature based on the entities they target, including *DNS name servers*, *open DNS resolvers*, *hosting providers*, and *clients*. Such categorization would reveal the most susceptible entity and its impact on the performance and security of whole DNS ecosystem. For example, open DNS resolvers can be exploited to conduct multiple attacks on behalf of attackers [@AgerMSU10; @AntonakakisDLPLB10; @ballaniF16; @GaoYCPGJD13; @HerrmannFLF14; @KuhrerHBRH15; @HerzbergS12; @PearceJLEFWP17; @PerdisciALL09; @SchompAR14; @SchompCRA14; @VermaHHHRKF16].
We discuss advantages and disadvantages of the proposed countermeasures at the end of each section and highlighted the existing open problems. We list the abbreviations used throughout this paper in . Finally, the key characteristics of our survey in this paper can be summarized as:
we conduct a comprehensive survey mainly focusing on recent major advances in the area of DNS security and privacy. The focuses of the survey are the threat landscape, research methods, and research scopes (based on a classification of the DNS system model).
The scope of the survey is defined in such a way that not only it focuses on the up-to-date challenges, by gathering works mostly published in the past decade, but also by focusing on the most critical and ongoing challenges corresponding to the current trend.
We highlight the existing open challenges in the security and privacy of DNS infrastructure, which requires further investigations by security specialists to be addressed. We use that as a summary in every surveyed area.
Organization
------------
In section \[sec:Preliminaries\] we present an overview of DNS functionality and DNS resolution. Major DNS threats and associated countermeasures are presented in section \[sec:Threats\]. DNS research methods are presented in section \[sec:Methods\]. In section \[sec:Entities\] we explore research work addressing the different entities in the DNS model. Finally, the paper is concluded in section \[sec:Conclusion\].
Preliminaries {#sec:Preliminaries}
=============
This section is devoted to provide an overview of how DNS works, including the domain name resolution process.
Functionality
-------------
When a user wants to visit a website through the Internet he does so by connecting to a domain name, such as www.example.com; however, computers do not communicate with domain names, but rather they are only able to communicate using addresses represented as numbers, namely IP addresses. Therefore, the domain name of the intended website should be converted to its associated IP address. Addresses in the network can be represented either using IPv4 or IPv6. The first is composed of four bytes and is represented using four number segments, such as 1.2.3.4, whereas IPv6 is four times larger and is composed of eight segments, each of them is two bytes and represented by hexadecimal numbers. In comparison to natural languages, recognizing and remembering numerical addresses of the intended Internet services is not an easy task for users. Therefore, in the early 1980’s Paul Mockapetris [@rfc883] introduced the basics of the DNS, which enables users to automatically map human-readable domain names into machine-readable addresses. DNS is an essential component of the functionality of the Internet.
DNS Resolution
--------------
DNS is a hierarchical and globally distributed directory service that utilizes root, TLD, and authoritative name servers in order to resolve string addresses of the domains into IP addresses. The process of domain name resolution is shown in .The DNS resolution process begins once a user attempts to access a web service using Internet web browser. In the case where there is no information about the given domain in the local cache and host table, the local resolver initiates a DNS query to a recursive resolver seeking to match the domain with its corresponding IP address. Then, the recursive resolver starts asking the root, TLD, and then authoritative name servers, and over steps through , to answer the query. The root server is the first server that receives queries from recursive resolvers, in step . The root servers are globally distributed and maintain the IP addresses and location of authoritative TLD name servers. In step , the root name server replies to the query with the appropriate list of authoritative TLD servers for the .com TLD. In step , the recursive server sends a query for example.com to the .com TLD name server. Once the query reaches the .com TLD name server, it responds with the IP address of the domain’s authoritative name server, as shown in step . At the next step, namely step , the recursive resolver sends a query to the authoritative name server. The authoritative name server knows the IP address for www.example.com and at step that answer is returned to the recursive name server. Finally, the determined IP address of the requested domain name is forwarded to the local resolver and then to a web browser. As a result, the browser can send a Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) request to the website to retrieve its contents.
DNS Threat Landscape {#sec:Threats}
====================
The original implementation of the DNS did not include security and privacy protections; instead the original DNS was built to be a scalable distributed system. As the Internet has grown, however, adversaries have found weaknesses that can be abused for malicious purposes. There is a large body of research in this area, which lead to identification of major threats that substantially compromise the DNS security. In this section, we would delve into the common threats in the DNS ecosystem and state-of-the-art countermeasures presented in the literature.
Our effort in enumerating and categorizing the literature in this domain is featured in the follow. We review the proposed methods for detection and mitigation of popular threats of DNS infrastructure, including amplification and DoS attacks (\[sec:Amplification\]), DNS cache poisoning attacks (\[sec:CachePoisoning\]), botnets attacks (\[sec:Botnet\]), phishing attacks (\[sec:Phishing\]), DNS manipulation (\[sec:Manipulation\]), malicious domain detection (\[sec:MaliciousDomain\]), domain generation algorithms (\[sec:DGA\]), domain name squatting (\[sec:Squatting\]), parked domain monetization and associated security issues (\[sec:Monetization\]), and privacy leakage (\[sec:Privacy\]).
In addition, we will discuss challenges and highlight open problems that require further investigations by security researchers associated with each of those major problems. In and , topical classification of DNS threats in the literature is addressed, with sample works presented as well.
Amplification and DoS Attacks {#sec:Amplification}
-----------------------------
A DNS amplification attack is a reflection-based DDoS attack. In DNS, an amplification attack is done by issuing a small number of DNS queries that are later transformed into a considerably large payload coordinated at the target network. The high level architecture of a typical DNS amplification attack is demonstrated in . The attacker hides the exploit source and directs the DNS response into the target address through spoofing look-up requests issued to DNS servers. It is difficult to defend against such an attack, since it originates from legitimate servers with legitimate traffic.
A wide variety research works have been conducted to detect and mitigate DNS amplification attacks [@ballaniF16; @HerzbergS14; @Rossow14; @RijswijkDeijSP14; @MacFarlandSK15; @VermaHHHRKF16; @AizuddinANNAA17; @PerdisciCG12; @TruongC16; @KimLCAJK17; @zheng2018realtime]. For instance, Ballani [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@ballaniF16] have presented a simple method based on caching behavior analysis of DNS resolvers to defend against DNS DoS attacks. They have stored cached records with TTL in a stale cache. Then, the stale cache can be used by a resolver that does not receive any response from the authoritative name servers.Herzberg [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@HerzbergS14] have designed an anti-reflection system, providing DNS authentication, which nullifies the amplification factor of the DNS responses abused for DoS attacks. DNS authentication is composed of two subsystems, namely a [*request authentication*]{} that detects and filters requests sent from spoofed IP addresses, and [*resolver authentication*]{} that maintains a list of potentially compromised hosts. They have deployed the resolver authentication as a cloud-based service to further reduce costs and provide additional defenses for DNS servers. Furthermore, Rijswijk-Deij [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@RijswijkDeijSP14] investigated the potential for abuse in DNSSEC-signed domains in a large scale, covering 70% of all signed domains in operation. Their analysis demonstrate that DNSSEC in-fact empowers DNS amplification attacks for a particular query type, *ANY*. In addition, Rossow [@Rossow14] has investigated Distributed Reflective Denial-of-Service (DRDoS) attacks through revisiting well-known UDP-based protocols, including network services, online games, file sharing networks, and botnets to assess their security against DRDoS abuse. His analysis revealed that attackers already started abusing 14 protocols through bandwidth amplification and multiplying the traffic up to a factor 4670.
MacFarland [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@MacFarlandSK15] examined a large number of domains ($\approx$129M) and authoritative servers ($\approx$1.1M) to investigate the inherent DNS amplification risks associated with DNS authoritative name servers. Their analysis showed that only a small number of authoritative servers ($\approx$3.8%) are responsible for the highest amplification factors. In addition, their analysis revealed that adoption of DNS response rate limit is limited to less than $\approx$3% of authoritative servers. Finally, they have suggested tunnelling into a remote resolver as a straightforward and simple countermeasure to mitigate on-going attack at the organization level. Verma [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@VermaHHHRKF16] have utilized the fact that DNS resolvers share the local DNS query rates to propose an amplified DNS attack mitigation system called Distributed Rate Sharing-based Amplified DNS-DDoS Attack Mitigation (DRS-ADAM). The authors claim that DRS-ADAM detects and *completely stops* an amplified DNS attack by imposing DNS query rate sharing among resolvers involved in an attack. DRS-ADAM has several advantages; deployment, robustness against manipulation, and attack mitigation.
Aizuddin [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@AizuddinANNAA17] have incorporated sFlow with security-centric SDN features to analyze DNS query identifiers (IDs) for detecting and mitigating DNS amplification attack in a timely manner. Their analysis showed that the proposed method provides accurate detection results (more than 97.0%) even with a small number of flow values (DNS attributes). Kim [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@KimLCAJK17] have presented a DNS amplification attack mitigation system through a one-to-one strict mapping method between DNS requests and responses in order to identify [*orphan DNS responses*]{}. Their analysis showed that the proposed solution removes the possibility of false positive packets. Zheng [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@zheng2018realtime] have proposed Reinforcing Anti-DDoS Actions in Real-time (RADAR) which detects various DDoS attacks, such as link flooding, SYN flooding, and UDP-based amplification attacks. They do so through adaptive correlation analysis on commercial off-the-shelf SDN switches. RADAR does not require any changes in the SDN protocols and switches deployed in the network today, nor does it require additional appliances to detect attacks, making it an easy-to-plug solution in today’s operations. Truong [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@TruongC16] analyzed DNS traffic to design a detection system for recognition of pseudo-random domain names, including Conficker and Zeus, form legitimate domain names. The proposed detection system is composed of two main subsystems, including feature extraction and classification. The length of domain names and their expected values construct the feature space and classification section is composed of several classification algorithms, e.g., RF, KNN, SVM, and NB.
[[.]{}]{} Despite the large body of research work on the detection and mitigation of DNS amplification and DoS attacks, such attacks are still prevalent and compromising today’s Internet. summarizes the proposed methods in the literature and their strengths and weaknesses. Shortcomings of the proposed methods, which would require further attention from the community, can be summarized as:
increasing response latency due to detection process, which requires light-weight and latency sensitive detectors [@HerzbergS14; @MacFarlandSK15; @AizuddinANNAA17; @KimLCAJK17].
requiring a range of changes to the DNS resolvers and semantics [@ballaniF16], which calls for work that address legacy-compatibility or require very little of such changes.
requiring large number of IP addresses to be collected every day [@PerdisciCG12], or requiring large number of flow rules [@zheng2018realtime], which calls for aggregate and light-weight feature engineering methods.
low detection accuracy, in some cases [@TruongC16], which calls for improving accuracy through multi-modality of detection features.
DNS Cache Poisoning {#sec:CachePoisoning}
-------------------
The DNS resolver cache, or simply DNS cache, is a temporary database that stores resolved DNS look-ups. As a result, this caching enables users to quickly resolve a previously visited website. Unfortunately, DNS cache can be compromised through the insertion of unauthorized domain names and IP addresses. General flow of the DNS cache poisoning attack is illustrated in . In this manner, users’ queries might be directed to a fake destination with malicious content or advertisements. DNS cache poisoning compromises the correct operation of Internet services and can be used for malicious activities, such as distributing malware and spam, phishing attacks, credential theft, [[etc.]{}]{}To this end, several research works have been conducted to detect and mitigate the DNS cache poisoning attacks [@ShulmanW14; @AntonakakisDLPLB10; @PerdisciALL09; @WuDZW15; @ChenMP15; @ChenAPNDL14; @HaoW17].
Herzberg and Shulman [@HerzbergS12] studied the security of the patched DNS and found that not only source ports may be circumvented by various NAT devices, but also IP address randomization of standard-conforming resolvers can be circumvented. In addition, they demonstrated that DNS query randomization with both random prefix and 0x20 encoding can be circumvented easily. Finally, they suggested the deployment of DNSSEC as a countermeasure to prevent DNS cache poisoning attacks. Furthermore, Weaver [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@WeaverKNP11] have analyzed a large number of measurement sessions from distinct IP addresses, collected by Netalyzr [@KreibichWNP10], to understand the DNS behavior. Their analysis revealed that DNS infrastructure suffers from significant limitations, such as inefficient look-ups, unreliability of IP-level fragmentation, and ISP-driven manipulation of DNS. Shulman and Waidner [@ShulmanW14] studied the security of DNS infrastructure and highlighted that although adoption of challenge-response defenses [@RFC6056; @RFC5452] are prevalent, DNS infrastructure is highly exposed to cache poisoning attacks. The authors claimed that DNSSEC is a suitable solution to defend against cache poisoning attacks. Antonakakis [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@AntonakakisDLPLB10] have studied open recursive DNS resolvers’ cache poisoning attacks and have found that attackers generally point victims to rogue IP addresses. Therefore, they have proposed Anax, a system that examines the nature of cache poisoning attacks and automatically detects them. Anax analyses resource records and extracts a set of statistical features, such as domain name diversity, 2LD diversity, 3LD diversity[^1], [[etc.]{}]{}Then, these features are fed into a set of learning algorithms, such as SVM, neural network, [[etc.]{}]{}for cache poisoning attack detection.
Perdisci [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@PerdisciALL09] proposed Wildcard SECure (WSEC) DNS as a solution that defends against DNS cache poisoning attacks. WSEC DNS incorporates wildcard domains with TXT resource records to secure recursive DNS servers from cache poisoning attacks. WSEC DNS can be easily deployed, since it does not require any modifications of the root and TLD name servers. Wu [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@WuDZW15] have proposed a DNS cache poisoning attack detection system based on the Kalman filter technique. The proposed system is composed of two subsystems: an entropy sequence, which is modeled using state space equations, and a second Kalman filter method, which is used to detect the attacks. The effectiveness of the proposed system is illustrated for both single and distributed cache poisoning attacks. The measurement errors and the correlation variation of the prediction errors are utilized for detection of the single and the distributed cache poisoning attacks, respectively. Chen [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@ChenAPNDL14] have investigated the impact of disposable domains on the caching behavior of the DNS resolvers. Their analysis showed that as the prevalence of the disposable domains increase, it is likely that the DNS cache begins to be filled with resource records that are unlikely to be reused. In addition, their analysis revealed that disposable domains not only are widely used by different industries, such as Anti-Virus companies, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}McAfee, Sophos, and popular websites, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}Microsoft, Google, social networks, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}Facebook, [[etc.]{}]{}, but also are increasing in that trend.
Similarly, Hao and Wang [@HaoW17] have studied the negative impact of one-time-use domain names on the performance of DNS caching. Therefore, they proposed a one-time-use domain detection system that incorporates syntactical features extracted from domain name string, such as length of query name, length of the longest sub-domain name, Sub-domain depth, [[etc.]{}]{}with machine learning algorithms is proposed. The authors argue that removal or even not inserting such resource records into the cache can prevent from waste of the DNS cache resources. [[.]{}]{} Different research works have proposed various methods for detection and mitigation of DNS cache poisoning attacks. These methods and their strengths and weaknesses are summarized . The limitations of proposed solutions can be summarized as:.
low deployment rate of DNSSEC [@HerzbergS12; @ShulmanW14], which by design address cache poisoning, calling for further exploration of how to creates incentives for the spread of DNSSEC deployment.
low detection accuracy [@AntonakakisDLPLB10; @HaoW17], calling for better accuracy using multiple types of features.
causing overheads on DNS traffic, memory usage and increasing response latency [@PerdisciALL09], calling for lightweight and more efficient approaches.
and wasting DNS cache storage resources by prefetching unpopular resource records [@ChenMP15], which calls for adaptive resolution.
Botnet and Attacks Using DNS {#sec:Botnet}
----------------------------
The word botnet is a combination of the words robot and network, and refers into a number of Internet-connected devices, each of which is running one or more [*bots*]{}. Botnets are composed of various infected hosts, C&C channels, and a botmaster. The general infrastructure of a botnet is shown in . Botnets can be used to perform DDoS attack [@rustock], password theft [@riccardi2013titans], and allow the attacker (botmaster) to access devices and their connection through C&C channels. Researchers have investigated the threat of botnets various works, including the intersection between botnets and DNS [@jinYGY2015; @JiangLLLDW12; @TruongC16; @PlohmannYKBG16; @XuBSY13].
Jiang [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@JiangLLLDW12] have studied whether deleting malicious domain names from upper level DNS servers can prevent botnet C&C and malware propagation. Their analysis showed that ghost domain names stay resolvable even long after the delegated data has been removed from the domain registry and the record’s TTL is expired. Finally, they suggest adoption of DNSSEC to overcome the threat of ghost domain attack. Jin [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@jinYGY2015] have investigated the characteristics of the DNS log of botnet domain resolution and extracted six different features, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}number of source IPs, total querying per day, and querying per hour, among others. These features are then fed into three different classification algorithms, including Adaboost, DT, and NB to detect botnet domain names. In addition, Chang [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@ChangMWC17] have performed longitudinal study to identify novel botmaster strategies through analyzing multiple active botnet families. Truong and Cheng [@TruongC16] have studied DNS traffic to design a detector that distinguishes domain names generated by legitimate users and pseudo-random domain names generated by botnets, such as Conficker [@ThomasM14] and Zeus [@MohaisenA13]. The proposed detector classifies the domain names based on machine learning algorithms, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}RF, KNN, SVM, and NB, and using extracted features from DNS traffic, including length of domain names and their expected values.
In addition, Xu [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@XuBSY13] have carried out a comprehensive study to investigate the feasibility of DNS as a stealthy botnet C&C channel. Therefore, they have tested various strategies, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}piggybacking query strategy and exponentially distributed query strategy, that can be utilized at the network level to effectively hide malicious DNS activities. Finally, a countermeasure is proposed that compares the probability distributions of legitimate DNS traffic and tunneling traffic. [[.]{}]{} Although various research works have studied botnets and possible solutions to defend against botnet attacks, such attacks are still compromising users and systems security, highlighting the limitations of the proposed methods. These methods and their strengths and weaknesses are summarized in . The shortcomings of the proposed methods can be summarized as follows: Low detection accuracy [@TruongC16; @JiangLLLDW12], high false alarm rate [@XuBSY13], and low deployment rate of DNSSEC [@JiangLLLDW12]. In addition, the emergence and rise of IoT and associated vulnerabilities opens a new research direction that requires further investigations. For example, the Mirai botnet attacks insecure IoT devices, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}routers and digital video recorders [@whittaker_2016; @palmer_2018] highlighting the need for security solutions optimized for the IoT devices [@kolias2017ddos; @bertino2017botnets]
Phishing Attacks and Defenses {#sec:Phishing}
-----------------------------
Attackers in phishing attack, attempt to acquire personal and secret information, such as passwords and details of credit cards, by disguising as a trustworthy entity in an electronic communication. In light of the MCSI review published on 2014, the yearly overall effect of the phishing and different types of data fraud attacks has been assessed at as high as US\$5 billion [@MicrosoftNews] only at one particular country, Singapore. Therefore, researchers have conducted a large number of works to detect and mitigate phishing attacks [@BilgeKKB11; @DagonPLL08; @KintisMLCGPNA17; @CookGD08; @MedvetKK08] .
For example, Bilge [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@BilgeKKB11] have presented a malicious domain detection system, called EXPOSURE, which analyzes various characteristics of DNS names and the way that they are queried. EXPOSURE analyzes DNS traffic and extracts different types of features, including time-based feature, DNS answer-based features, TTL value-based features, and domain name-based feature. Those features are then used by EXPOSURE to design a decision based classifier for automatic detection of a wide range of malicious domain names, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}botnet C&C servers, phishing sites, and scam hosts.
[l|l|c|c|l]{} & & &\
& & G & L &\
[@BilgeKKB11] & EXPOSURE & & & AR\
[@CookGD08] & Phishwish & & & AR\
[@MedvetKK08] & Visual similarity & & & AR\
[@HaraYM09] & Visual similarity & & & AR\
0
{width="99.00000%"}
{width="99.00000%"}
[[-based approaches.]{}]{} Cook [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@CookGD08] proposed a mechanism, Phishwish, to detect phishing messages or emails with a small false positive rate. The idea of Phishwish was to provide better protection against zero-hour attacks than blacklists. Phishwish analyzes text and HTML formatted emails using four general rules: identification and analysis of the log-in URL in the email, analysis of the email headers, analysis of the images in the email, and analysis of the accessibility of the URLs.
Medvet [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@MedvetKK08] presented a phishing detection method based on the visual-similarity that works based on analyzing three main characteristics of websites; the text pieces, the embedded images in the page, and the overall visual appearance of the website. A similarity signature is calculated for legitimate and suspicious websites and an alarm is raised if the signatures were too similar. Furthermore, Hara [[*et al.*]{}]{}[@HaraYM09] have proposed a phishing detection technique based on visual similarity that works even if the original website is not registered in the database. A collection of legitimate websites are used to train the classifier and store in a database. A suspected website’s snapshot is then compared to the websites in the database; the suspected website is labeled as phishing if the image similarity metric is above a certain threshold. In case where there is no similar website in the database the suspected website is considered as legitimate website. [[.]{}]{} Despite the large number of research works that have studied the detection and mitigation of phishing attacks, the landscape of phishing is an expanding area contributing very much to the DNS security landscape. summarizes the proposed methods in the literature and their strengths and weaknesses. Low detection accuracy [@CookGD08; @HaraYM09], requiring large number of train samples [@BilgeKKB11], dependency of the performance to train inputs [@BilgeKKB11; @MedvetKK08], and not being adaptive to the changes in the scenarios [@HaraYM09] are some of the shortcomings of the proposed methods in the literature. In addition, phishers are targeting mobile messaging and social apps in increasing rate [@wandera_2018], which requires further detailed investigations to be addressed.
DNS Manipulation {#sec:Manipulation}
----------------
The process of diverting legitimate DNS requests to malicious IP addresses, which are hosted on misbehaving servers, is known as DNS manipulation. DNS manipulation behavior of attackers exposes users to threats, such as phishing and content injection. It is thus not a surprise that a large number of studies have focused on DNS manipulation [@SchompCRA14; @KuhrerHBRH15; @PearceJLEFWP17; @TrevisanDMM17].
For instance, the vulnerability of the user-side DNS infrastructure to record injection threats have been measured by Schomp [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@SchompCRA14]. Their analysis showed that a large number (9%) of open DNS resolvers are vulnerable to record injection attacks and are abused by attacks on shared DNS infrastructure. They have measured the extent of popular record injection attacks, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}Kaminsky [@kaminsky2008black] and the deployment of familiar defensive methods, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}0x20 encoding [@DagonAVJL08].
Kuhrer [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@KuhrerHBRH15] have investigated the negative aspects of open DNS resolvers that can be abused by attackers for various malicious activities, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}amplification DDoS attacks, DNS manipulation, and cache poisoning, among others. The authors have investigated the response authenticity of the open resolvers from the user’s point of view, and found that millions of them deliberately manipulate DNS resolutions for censoring communication channels, injecting advertisements, serving malicious files, and performing phishing attacks. Furthermore, Jones [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@JonesFPWA16] have proposed an approach for the detection of unauthorized DNS root manipulation using two different techniques. The first technique analyzes the latency to root servers and the second technique analyzes route hijacks. Their analysis revealed that the entities that are operating unauthorized root servers can completely control the entire Internet name space for any system within their sphere.
Pearce [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@PearceJLEFWP17] proposed a scalable and lightweight system, called Iris, which measures and detects the widespread of DNS manipulation at the scale of countries, which were manipulated based on tactics that rely on DNS resolvers. Iris collects DNS queries through geographically distributed DNS resolvers and analyzes the responses based on two metrics, the consistency and the independent verifiability metrics. Iris investigates both sensitive domains and domains of popular websites for DNS manipulation. Their analysis showed that DNS manipulation is a phenomenon that is heterogeneous across resolvers, domain names, and countries.
Trevisan [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@TrevisanDMM17] proposed an automatic and parameter-free detection system, called REMeDy, which identifies rogue DNS resolvers. REMeDy analyzes DNS traffic and evaluates the consistency of responses across all resolvers for automatic identification of manipulated responses. [[.]{}]{} DNS infrastructure suffers from multiple issues, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}inefficient look-ups, unreliability of IP-level fragmentation, and ISP-driven DNS manipulation [@WeaverKNP11]. Moreover, record injection vulnerabilities, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}Kaminsky [@kaminsky2008black] are widespread [@SchompCRA14]. Attackers can utilize standard-conforming resolvers to circumvent mitigation techniques [[*e.g.*]{},]{}source port randomization as well as IP address randomization [@HerzbergS12; @TrevisanDMM17] to manipulate DNS. In addition, ISPs are clearly willing to involve in DNS manipulation for reasons, such as error traffic monetization [@WeaverKP11]. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that root servers can be abused by unauthorized entities for malicious activities, such as blocking access to websites or manipulate responses through MITM proxies [@JonesFPWA16].
![General flow of the malicious domains detection based on machine learning algorithms. It is composed of two steps; training ML model over representative features of labeled domain names and then using the trained model to classify unknown domain names.[]{data-label="MDD_ML"}](fig/MDD_ML.pdf){width="45.00000%"}
Malicious Domains Detection {#sec:MaliciousDomain}
---------------------------
Domains and domain names provide a hierarchy of unique identifiers that guide traffic across the Web and identify websites, servers and other resources. Notwithstanding, in the form of malicious domains, they are an essential apparatus in the hands of miscreants. There are no silver bullets for securing against malicious domains. Nonetheless, understanding domain names can enable firms and individual stakeholders to protect themselves against attacks. A wide variety of research works have been done for accurate detection of malicious domain names[@AntonakakisPLVD11; @BilgeKKB11; @BilgeSBKK14; @CanaliCVK11; @FelegyhaziKP10; @GaoYCPGJD13; @HaoKMPF16; @HaoTPFKGH13; @jinYGY2015; @LuoTZSLNM15; @MaSSV09; @HaoFP11; @LiuLDWLD17].
This work is classified into two general categories, classification based [@AntonakakisPDLF10; @AntonakakisPLVD11; @BilgeKKB11; @BilgeSBKK14; @jinYGY2015] and inference based [@GaoYCPGJD13; @LuoTZSLNM15; @LiuLDWLD17]. The classification based approaches rely on local network and host information; however, inference based approach exploits the global information along with local information. The general structure of the malicious domain detection systems based on classification approaches is shown in .
[[based approach.]{}]{} Antonakakis [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@AntonakakisPDLF10] have presented a malicious domain detection system, Notos, which works based on assigning dynamic reputation score to any domain name in a DNS query. Notos maintains up-to-date DNS information of domain names by gathering such information from various sources such as the DNS zone and associated IP addresses, BGP prefixes, AS information, and honeypot analysis. This information is then used to build models of benign/malicious domain names, and then used to calculate the reputation scores of new domains indicative of their maliciousness. Instead of monitoring traffic from local recursives, Antonakakis [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@AntonakakisPLVD11] presented Kopis, which detects malware-related domains by monitoring DNS traffic at the upper DNS hierarchy. Kopis offers a new set of traffic features, including daily patterns of domain name resolution, the significance of requesters within each epoch, and the reputation of IP addresses that leverage a global visibility, thus leading to an early detection of malicious domains. Kopis offers independent malware domain detection within DNS operator’s authority and works well even if there is no available information about IP reputation. Bilge [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@BilgeKKB11] have presented a malicious domain detection system, called EXPOSURE, which analyzes a large set of passive DNS records. EXPOSURE analyzes various characteristics of DNS names and the way that they are queried, and extracts various kinds of features, namely time-based feature, DNS answer-based features, TTL value-based features, and domain name-based feature. These features are then used to design a decision tree based classifier that automatically detects a wide range of malicious domain names, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}botnet C&C servers, phishing sites, and scam hosts. Later they extended their work by analyzing a large set of real-world DNS requests over 17 months period of EXPOSURE’s operation [@BilgeSBKK14]. They showed that EXPOSURE is able to make meaningful connections between various malicious domains. For example, there exist IP addresses that are shared among thousands of unique domain names indicative of botnet-related domain names. Jin [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@jinYGY2015] have investigated the characteristics of the DNS log of botnet domain resolution to extract representative features, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}Number of source IPs, Total querying per day, Querying per hour [[etc.]{}]{}These features are then used to build a malicious domain detection system that consists of three different classification algorithms: Adaboost, DT, and NB. [[-based approach.]{}]{} Strong associations of domains with known malicious domains is a vital point in effective malicious domain detection. Therefore, Khalil [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@KhalilGNY18] have designed an association-based scheme for the detection of malicious domains with high accuracy and coverage. They have analyzed active DNS data and extracted two types of features, namely, domain based features and IP block based features. These features are then used to accurately distinguish public IPs from dedicated ones, consequently building high-quality associations between domain names and identifying malicious domains. Furthermore, Gao [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@GaoYCPGJD13] have utilized temporal correlation analysis of DNS queries to detect unknown malicious domains based on the related known malicious anchor domains. The proposed approach is able to detect a wide range of correlated malicious domain groups, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}phishing, spam, and DGA-generated domains. The results demonstrated that on average each of the known malicious anchor domains can detect more than 53 previously unknown malicious domains.
Luo [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@LuoTZSLNM15] have proposed a comprehensive framework that uses evolutionary learning for detection of diverse clusters of DNS failures, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}highly random, mutated string, and sub-string domain name failure patterns using different syntactic and temporal patterns. In order to reduce the computational cost, less suspicious clusters were removed while more suspicious cases were preserved for further analysis.
[[-of-registration detection.]{}]{} Early detection of potentially malicious DNS domains are of high importance for network operators, registries or registrars, and law enforcement professionals to defend against many Internet attacks. Therefore, Hao [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@HaoTPFKGH13] have explored registration behaviors of malicious domains with an eye towards features that might indicate the maliciousness of a domain at the time of registration. The characteristics of registrars, domains life cycle, and names patterns were investigated and the results showed that spammers use a small set of registrars to register previously used domains in bulk.
Hao [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@HaoKMPF16] have proposed a malicious domain detection system, PREDATOR, that proactively detects malicious domains using time-of-registration statistical features, including registration history features, domain profile features, and batch correlation features. These features are used to build ML-based classifier, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}SVM, CMP that detects malicious domains before they appear in DNS blacklists. Moreover, Felegyhazi [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@FelegyhaziKP10] proposed an approach for proactive malicious domain blacklisting that relies on registration and name server information of small set of known malicious domains to predict whether a larger set of domains are malicious. Their analysis showed that on average 3.5 to 15 new domains can be derived from a given known malicious domain. [[-based approach.]{}]{} Ma [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@MaSSV09] have studied application of batch and online learning approaches for detection of malicious web sites using live feed of labeled URLs and based on the lexical and host-based features. Their analysis showed that size of the training dataset and changes on the distribution of the features affects the performance of the batch algorithms. However, online confidence weighted algorithm is able to classify the labeled URLs in real time and with high accuracy. Furthermore, Canali [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@CanaliCVK11] have proposed a malicious web pages detection system based on a fast and reliable filter, Prophiler, that filters out benign web pages from further costly analysis. Prophiler examines a web page for malicious contents using different types of static features, such as HTML features, JavaScript features, URL and host-based features.
[[.]{}]{} Although there exists a large body of research devoted to detection of malicious domain names, miscreants have used the DNS to build malicious network infrastructure, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}botnet [@PerdisciCG12]. The summary of the proposed methods and their strengths and weaknesses are listed in . Shortcomings of the proposed methods can be summarized as following: low detection accuracy [@AntonakakisPDLF10; @CanaliCVK11; @jinYGY2015; @FelegyhaziKP10; @HaoKMPF16], local visibility [@AntonakakisPDLF10; @BilgeKKB11; @BilgeSBKK14], expensive computation [@MaSSV09], dependency on training dataset [@AntonakakisPDLF10; @BilgeKKB11; @BilgeSBKK14; @AntonakakisPLVD11], requiring correlation between anchor malicious domain and unknown malicious domains [@LuoTZSLNM15; @GaoYCPGJD13], and can be evaded by avoiding certain features or behaviors [@BilgeKKB11; @BilgeSBKK14; @HaoKMPF16].
![The General overview of the communication of the malware-infected hosts with C&C servers. DGAs are being used as main method of communication in botnets.[]{data-label="DGAStruct"}](fig/DGAStructure.pdf){width="50.00000%"}
Domain Generation Algorithm {#sec:DGA}
---------------------------
Malware operation sometimes relies on a fixed domain or IP addresses, which can be hindered quickly. Thus, the primary idea of Domain generation algorithms (DGAs) were instead of developing new versions of the malware or setting everything up at another server, the malware would transfer its C&C to another domain at regular intervals. DGAs are utilized to intermittently produce a large number of domain names and usually for malicious purposes. For instance, shows a sample DGA code that is utilized to generate algorithmic domain names. DGAs are being used as the main method of communication in botnets. For example, shows an overview of the communication of malware-infected hosts with C&C servers. There exist several research works that explored the ecosystem of DGAs [@YadavRRR10; @AntonakakisPNVALD12; @baraboschWLG12; @PlohmannYKBG16; @TruongC16; @SpauldingPKM18].
Yadav [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@YadavRRR10] studied algorithmically generated domain names for domain fluxing. Statistical measures, such as Kullback-Leibler divergence [@kullbackL1951], Jaccard index, and the Levenshtein edit distance were used to explore whether a group of domains are algorithmically generated or not. They have applied their method to Tier-1 ISP’s DNS traces and the results showed that it can automatically detect domain fluxing, even for unknown and unclassified botnets, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}Mjuyh. Plohmann [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@PlohmannYKBG16] have conducted a large-scale measurement study to understand domain generating malware. They investigated and presented a taxonomy for 43 DGA-based malware families to identify and compare their characteristics. Using reverse engineering and re-implementation of the algorithms they pre-computed more than 159M possible DGA-based domain names, which can be used for both predictive blocking of C&C accesses as well as accurate identification of malware families and related campaigns of future DGA domain names.
``` {.python language="Python"}
def generate_domain(y, m, d):
domain = “”
for i in range(16):
y=((y^8*y)>>11)^((y&0xFFFFFFF0)<<17)
m=((m^4*m)>>25)^16*(m&0xFFFFFFF8)
d=((d^(d<<13))>>19)^((d&0xFFFFFFFE)<<12)
dm+=chr(((y^m^d)%25)+97)
return domain
```
Antonakakis [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@AntonakakisPNVALD12] have investigated unsuccessful DNS resolutions to detect groups of potential DGA domains. They built a DNS-based DGA domain detection system, called Pleiades, which works based on the characteristics of partially registered algorithmically generated domain names.
Spaulding [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@SpauldingPKM18] have presented a malicious domain detection system that proactively detects algorithmically generated domain names. Their work highlighted the difference between the number of NXDomain responses of benign and algorithmically generated domain names prior to registration. These patterns are then used to build a classification system using sliding time windows. Barabosch [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@baraboschWLG12] have presented an automatic method to extract DGAs from malware binaries using dynamic analysis in combination with data flow analysis. In addition, a taxonomy of DGA families is defined using time dependency and causality features. Truong [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@TruongC16] have analyzed DNS traffic to design a detection system for recognition of algorithmically generated domain names form legitimate domain names. The length of domain names and their expected values are then used to build a classifier that identifies pseudo-random domain names generated by botnets, such as Conficker [@ThomasM14] and Zeus [@MohaisenA13]. [[.]{}]{} Some major challenges of detecting DGA-based domains include constructing a taxonomy of DGA families [@baraboschWLG12; @PlohmannYKBG16], collecting domain names generated by different malware families [@PlohmannYKBG16], reconstruction of DGAs by reverse engineering malware[@AntonakakisPNVALD12; @baraboschWLG12], learning newly found DGAs (being generic) [@AntonakakisPNVALD12; @YadavRRR10], and low detection accuracy [@TruongC16].
Domain Name Squatting {#sec:Squatting}
---------------------
Domain name squatting, also known as cybersquatting, is registering or using an Internet domain name with the bad intent to profit from a trademark belonging to someone else. Cybersquatters register variants of popular trademark names through different squatting strategies, including typosquatting, bitsquatting, combosquatting, and soundsquatting. Domain name squatting practices expose users to a variety of vulnerabilities, such as trademark infringement, monetization, malware, and scams. There exists several research works that attempted to investigate the landscape and impact of the domain squatting [@AgtenJPN15; @KhanHLK15; @KintisMLCGPNA17; @SpauldingNM17; @SzurdiKCSFK14; @SpauldingUM17; @VissersBGJN17], which we define below.
### Typosquatting
Typosquatting is one of the most common forms of domain squatting that targets Internet users who incorrectly type a website address into their web browser, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}*www.examlpe.com* instead of *www.example.com*, and mainly for monetization activities. To this end, researchers have attempted to systematically introduce typo-generation models [@DWangBWVD06; @BanerjeeBFB08]. For instance, Wang [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@DWangBWVD06] have discovered common typo-generation models of Alexa top domain list, namely missing-dot typos, character-omission typos, character-permutation typos, character-substitution typos, and character-duplication typos. Similarly, Banerjee [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@BanerjeeBFB08] have suggested different methods for generating typosquatting domains, including 6.1-mod-inplace, 7.1-mod-deflate, and 8.1-mod-inflate. Furthermore, Spaulding [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@SpauldingUM16] have explored the landscape of the typosquatted domain names and summarized common typo-generation models and monetization strategies, which are shown in .
Agten [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@AgtenJPN15] conducted a longitudinal study of typosquatting domains and trends. Their analysis showed that 95% of the studied top domains are targeted by typosquatters; however, only few trademark owners take protection practices, such as proactive registration of typosquatted domains. Furthermore, they observed a change in the trend and monetization behaviors of typosquatters over time and through hosting different types of websites, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}parked/ads/for sale domains and scams. Moreover, Szurdi [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@SzurdiKCSFK14] conducted a large-scale measurement of typosquatting domain registrations in the .com TLD. This study explores the monetization strategies among less known domains. Their analysis showed that 95% of typosquatting domains target the long tail of the popularity distribution. In addition, they found that typosquatting domains constitute 20% of the domains in the .com TLD and the trend is increasing. Moreover, [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@BanerjeeBFB08] revealed that for a given authoritative domain the percentage of active typosquatting domains decreases remarkably as the popularity of domains decline.
However, the results of these two research works [@SzurdiKCSFK14; @AgtenJPN15] are in contrast to the results presented by
Khan [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@KhanHLK15] have explored the impact of typosquatted domains on the users through measuring the harm experienced by users using intent inference metric. Their analysis showed that typosquatting practice increases the time it takes to find an intended website, generally 1.3 seconds per typosquatting event over the alternative of receiving a browser error page. Spaulding [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@SpauldingNM17; @SpauldingUM17] have conducted a user study to understand the effectiveness of the typosquatting strategies in deceiving users. The behaviour of users, who have been exposed to several typosquatting URLs, have been examined in an attempt to figure out whether their behavior is improved by security education and increasing their awareness about typosquatters. They found that user’s behavior is affected the most by factors such as age and education. Furthermore, the results showed that typo-generation models, such as permutations and substitutions of characters are among the most effective techniques in deceiving users, as opposed to techniques that rely on adding characters to the domain names.
![Common typo-generation models and monetization strategies. Notice that permutations and substitutions of characters are among the most effective techniques in deceiving users.[]{data-label="fig:Typosquatting"}](fig/Typosquatting_R1.pdf){width="50.00000%"}
### Bitsquatting
The main premise of bitsquatting [@NikiforakisAMDPJ13; @Dinaburg] is hardware malfunction and it refers to registration of domain names with one different bit from popular domain names in an attempt to receive unintentional traffic caused by bit-flip errors in the memory of computers. This theory is tested, for the first time, by Dinaburg [@Dinaburg] through investigating all HTTP requests to 30 registered bitsquatted versions of popular domain names, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}amazon.com. The results of eight months of experience showed that there were over 52K bitsquat requests from more than 12K unique IP addresses, highlighting the feasibility and presence of bitsquatting. Finally, a hardware-based defense strategy that analyzes the integrity of data stored in hardware is introduced. Furthermore, Nikiforakis [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@NikiforakisAMDPJ13] explored the bitsquatting phenomenon in more detail and found that attackers register new bitsquatting domains daily. Their results showed that bitsquatting domains involve different monetization practices, such as parked/ads/for sale domains, affiliate marketing, and scams. Finally, they reviewed possible defense strategies against bitsquatting, such as data integrity validation, DNSSEC, and pre-registering all possible bitsquatting domains.
Vissers [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@VissersBGJN17] have conducted a large-scale analysis of configuration issues, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}typosquatting and hardware errors, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}bitsquatting over 10K popular name server domains. Their analysis confirmed the presence of squatting vulnerabilities among name servers, thus compromising all domains that rely on them. Furthermore, they analyzed the security practices of popular name servers and found that 12K domains are directly exposed to being hijacked through configuration errors related to their name server and 52.8M domains are being targeted by name server bitsquatters. Finally, they suggested deployment of DNSSEC as an effective countermeasure.
[l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c]{} & & & &\
& T & B & C & SS & PAF & S & HS & AM & &\
[@SpauldingUM16] & & & & & & & & & Squatting comparison & —\
[@KintisMLCGPNA17] & & & & & & & & & Combosquatting & No detection\
[@DWangBWVD06] & & & & & & & & & Typo-generation models & Limited data\
[@AgtenJPN15] & & & & & & & & & Longitudinal study & Limited data\
[@SzurdiKCSFK14] & & & & & & & & & YATT mitigation tool & Updating blacklist\
[@KhanHLK15] & & & & & & & & & Typosquatting detector & Large user traffic\
[@Dinaburg] & & & & & & & & & Bitsquatting/defense & impractical\
[@NikiforakisAMDPJ13] & & & & & & & & & Bitsquatting/defense & Costly/impractical\
[@VissersBGJN17] & & & & & & & & & Name server squatting & Low deployment\
[@NikiforakisBDPJ14] & & & & & & & & & Soundsquatting & Accuracy rate\
### Combosquatting
Combosquatting is a type of domain squatting in which a popular trademark is combined with one or multiple phrases, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}*www.youtube-login.com* instead of *www.youtube.com*. In order to explore its scope, Kintis [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@KintisMLCGPNA17] have analyzed Lexical characteristics and temporal properties of DNS records, collected from PDNS and ADNS sources over six years, for in depth and long-term analysis of combosquatting domains. The results showed that combosquatting domains are generated by adding a single token to the original domain and they are far more prevalent than typosquatting. In addition, they found that combosquatting domains are increasing in numbers, while large fraction of them ($\approx$60%) stay active for more than 1000 days.
### Soundsquatting
Soundsquatting is a type of domain squatting technique that takes the advantage of homophones words and the users confusion, such as such as *[whether, weather]{}* and *[idle, idol, idyll]{}* to generate squatted domains. Nikiforakis[[*et al.*]{}]{} [@NikiforakisBDPJ14] have explored the landscape of soundsquatting and showed that attackers are already familiar with soundsquatting concepts, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}generative models of soundsquatted domains and are monetizing them in different ways, such as parked/ads/for sale domains, hit stealing, and affiliate marketing. Furthermore, they proposed a tool, Auto Sound Squatter (AutoSS), that automatically generates soundsquatting domains. In addition, they showed that users are exposed to soundsquatting through the abuse of text-to-speech software, including the built-in screen reader of Windows XP, Windows 7 and Mac OS X, the Thunder screen reader [@Thunder], ORCA [@Orca], and Skyvi [@skyvi].
[[.]{}]{} Researchers have identified various domain squatting strategies [[*e.g.*]{},]{}typosquatting, bitsquatting, [[etc.]{}]{}, which are listed in along with the summary, contribution, and limitations of the research works that investigated them. Despite the proposed methods to mitigate domain squatting, squatting phenomenon is continuing to thrive and expand [@SzurdiKCSFK14; @KintisMLCGPNA17]. The limitations of the existing research proposals can be summarized as following: 1) lack of practical yet automatic domain squatting detection system [@KintisMLCGPNA17], 2) requiring a huge amount of user traffic or content for building models [@KhanHLK15], and 3) lack of practical yet effective mitigation techniques [@NikiforakisAMDPJ13; @VissersBGJN17; @Dinaburg]. For instance, the research proposals which suggest deployment of DNSSEC [@NikiforakisAMDPJ13; @VissersBGJN17] should consider the fact that deployment rate of DNSSEC although increasing but still far from ideal point.
Parked Domain Monetization {#sec:Monetization}
--------------------------
Domain parking refers to the registration of an Internet domain name without having the domain associated with any services such as e-mail or a website. Domain parking can be classified as monetized and non-monetized. In the former, advertisements are shown to visitors and the domain is monetized; whereas, non-monetized parked domains reserve the domain name for future development or to protect against the possibility of cybersquatting. Despite technically being a legitimate business, parked domain monetization can get mixed up with suspicious practices and malicious contents such as malware. Therefore, several works were conducted to understand parked domains and monetization strategies [@AlrwaisYALW14; @SzurdiKCSFK14; @WeaverKP11; @VissersJN15].
Alrwais [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@AlrwaisYALW14] carried out a comprehensive study on the dark side of the parked domains to understand monetization, its scope, and magnitude. They controlled the start and end node of the monetization process, using an infiltration method, to send crawling traffic among specified start and end nodes with the monetization entities in between. Their analysis of one thousand seed redirection chains proved the presence of threats, such as click fraud, traffic spam, and traffic stealing in the monetization process. In addition, the results of this study showed that the revenue of the responsible parties for illicit monetization activities is as high as 40% of the total revenues.
[l|l|l|l]{} **Work** & **Method** & **strengths** &**Weaknesses**\
[@HerrmannFLF14] & EncDNS & Lightweight/Low-latency & Unresolveable internal domains\
[@LuT10] & PPDNS & Improved privacy & Complex/DNS modification\
[@MohaisenGR17] & DLV-Aware/PP-DLV & Improved privacy & MITM attacks/record modification\
[@ZhaoHS07] & Range query & Simple/flexible & Bandwidth/response latency\
[@ZhaoHS07-1] & PIR & Improved bandwidth & Protocol modification\
[@ZhuHHWMS15] & T-DNS & Improved privacy/security & Response latency\
[@KrishnanM10] & No DNS prefetching & Inference attacks & Inaccurate TTL/Unstable profiles\
Szurdi [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@SzurdiKCSFK14] have conducted a large-scale measurement study to understand the impact of typosquatting on the monetization strategies of attackers among less known domains. Their analysis showed that large proportion (95.0%) of the typosquatting domains are targeting less popular websites for domain monetization techniques [[*e.g.*]{},]{}parked ads. Furthermore, Weaver [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@WeaverKP11] have investigated the error traffic monetization practices of ISPs through analyzing 66,000 *Netalyzr* session traces. Their analysis showed that ISPs were clearly involving on error traffic monetization by rerouting traffic to ad servers. Vissers [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@VissersJN15] have investigated the ecosystem of parked domains from security view point to understand the security risks of parked domains on users. Their analysis showed that parked domains expose users into a set of threats, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}malware, scam, and inappropriate content. Finally, they have presented a RF-based parked domain detection system through analyzing a set of generic features, including HTML features, HTTP archive features, frame Features, and domain name features. [[.]{}]{} Although domain parking is technically a legitimate business, it has been mixed up with malicious practices such as click fraud, malware, scam, malicious contents, [[etc.]{}]{} [@VissersJN15; @AlrwaisYALW14]. Dishonest parking services offer high revenue for responsible parties, which may compromise the benefits of legitimate advertisers and traffic buyers, by manipulating the traffic and redirecting them to rogue ad servers [@AlrwaisYALW14]. Moreover, domain monetization is prevalent among both popular domains and less known domains [@SzurdiKCSFK14]. In addition, ISPs actively involve traffic monetization activities [@WeaverKP11].
Privacy Leakage {#sec:Privacy}
---------------
A range of works have been conducted to address privacy-related issues of DNS [@Castillo-PerezG09; @HerrmannFLF14; @KrishnanM10; @LuT10; @PaxsonCJRSSSTVW13; @MohaisenGR17; @ZhuHHWMS15; @LiuHW16; @MohaisenR17; @MohaisenKR16]. For example, Herrmann [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@HerrmannFLF14] have explored the emerging threat of third-party DNS resolvers, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}Google Public DNS and OpenDNS to online privacy and introduced a lightweight privacy-preserving name resolution service called *EncDNS*. EncDNS is designed based on the encapsulation of encrypted messages in standards-compliant DNS messages. EncDNS is compatible with existing popular DNS resolvers and offers low-latency DNS resolution. Furthermore, Shulman [@Shulman14] have explored the existing proposals on DNS privacy that suggested encryption of DNS requests as a solution. The results demonstrated that a straightforward application of encryption alone may not provide the desired DNS privacy protection.
Krishnan [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@KrishnanM10] have explored the privacy implications of *DNS prefetching*. Their analysis showed that an adversary can abuse the context inserted to a resolver’s cache through prefetching to launch disclosure attacks, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}reconstructing searched terms. Thus, they suggested that DNS prefetching should be turned off by default. Zhu [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@ZhuHHWMS15] have presented a connection-oriented DNS, called *T-DNS*, to address the privacy and security issues of the connectionless DNS. T-DNS takes advantage of both TCP and TLS: while TCP protects the server against amplification attacks, TLS defends against eavesdroppers to the RDNS resolvers. In addition, Reddy [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@TDLS] have explored the protection of the privacy-sensitive information of DNS queries and responses. They presented a protection mechanism, called the *Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)*, for DNS exchange. DTLS counters passive listening and active attacks. The proposed mechanism reduces the DTLS round trips and the handshake size as well.
Zhao [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@ZhaoHS07] have investigated the privacy disclosure of DNS queries and proposed a privacy-preserving query scheme, called *Range Query*, which reduces privacy disclosure by concealing the actual queries using noisy traffic. However, Castillo-Perez and Garc[í]{}a[-]{}Alfaro [@Castillo-PerezG09] demonstrated that the privacy ensured by noisy traffic is not only difficult to analyze, but also does introduce undesired latency and bandwidth consumption. Castillo-Perez and Garc[í]{}a[-]{}Alfaro [@Castillo-PerezG09] have evaluated two DNS privacy-preserving proposals, the *Range Query* [@ZhaoHS07] and the *Privacy Information Retrieval (PIR)* schemes [@ZhaoHS07-1]. They demonstrated that both of these approaches are not desired. The first approach increases the latency and the bandwidth during the execution and resolution of queries. Although the second approach is designed to address the limitations of the first approach, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}bandwidth consumption, its functionality requires major modification of the DNS protocol, and relies on the use of DNSSEC.
Lu and Tsudik [@LuT10] explored DNS privacy leaks during domain resolution and presented Privacy-Preserving DNS (PPDNS) that mitigates the privacy issues in DNS. PPDNS takes advantage of both distributed hash tables (DHTs) and computational private information retrieval (cPIR). While DHT is an alternative naming infrastructure that provides name resolution query privacy, cPIR reduces communication overhead. However, Federrath [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@FederrathFHP11] argue that although PPDNS provides high level of privacy, it would not be adopted in the near future due to its computational complexity and requirement for completely different DNS infrastructure. DNS blocking of unintended queries is among the suggested solutions to improve the DNS privacy. For example, Appelbaum and Muffett [@rfc7686] have studied Tor’s privacy and suggested to block .onion names at stub, recursive, and authoritative resolvers to improve it’s privacy. Mohaisen and Ren [@MohaisenR17] have investigated the leakage of .onion at the A and J DNS root nodes over a longitudinal period of time and have found that .onion leakage is common and persistent at DNS infrastructure. Furthermore, Mohaisen [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@MohaisenKR16] have studied the impact of blocking of unintended queries under different adversarial settings on the DNS privacy. The results highlighted that partial blocking at stub resolver would negatively affect the DNS privacy under certain adversary models; however, blocking the queries at the recursive would result in favorable privacy outcomes.
[[.]{}]{} Full and proper deployment of DNSSEC relies on cooperation between domain owners, name server owners, registries, and ISPs. Thus, various methods have been proposed to improve the privacy of DNS which are listed in along with their strengths and weaknesses. It should be noted that DNSSEC does not necessarily protect privacy. Although DNS over TLS protects against eavesdropping, it is not clear what of privacy it offers. In addition, existing approaches require modifications to the DNS protocols [@ZhaoHS07]. Privacy issues have been overlooked by DNS security efforts (such as DNSSEC) and are thus likely to propagate into future versions of DNS [@LuT10], requiring further attention.
[l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l]{} **Work** & & & & & & & & & &\
[@ZouZPPLL16] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@AizuddinANNAA17] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@ballaniF16] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@HerzbergS14] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@MacFarlandSK15] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@PerdisciCG12] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@TruongC16] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@VermaHHHRKF16] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@ShulmanW14] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@AntonakakisDLPLB10] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@ChenMP15] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@PerdisciALL09] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@WuDZW15] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@ChenAPNDL14] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@HaoW17] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@HerzbergS12] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@jinYGY2015] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@JiangLLLDW12] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@PlohmannYKBG16] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@XuBSY13] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@WeaverKNP11] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@SchompCRA14] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@KuhrerHBRH15] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@PearceJLEFWP17] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@BilgeKKB11] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@DagonPLL08] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@KintisMLCGPNA17] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@AntonakakisPDLF10] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@AntonakakisPLVD11] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@BilgeSBKK14] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@CanaliCVK11] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@FelegyhaziKP10] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@GaoYCPGJD13] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@HaoKMPF16] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@HaoTPFKGH13] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@KhalilGNY18] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@LuoTZSLNM15] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@MaSSV09] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@HaoFP11] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@LiuLDWLD17] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@SzurdiKCSFK14] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@YadavRRR10] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@KhanHLK15] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@VissersBGJN17] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@AlrwaisYALW14] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@WeaverKP11] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@VissersJN15] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@HerrmannFLF14] & & & & & & & & & &\
[l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l]{} **Work** & & & & & & & & & &\
[@LuT10] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@MohaisenGR17] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@Tajalizadehkhoob17a] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@LiAXYW13] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@RahbariniaPA15] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@ShulmanW15] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@HerzbergS13] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@JonesFPWA16] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@ZhuHHWMS15] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@KrishnanM10] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@Castillo-PerezG09] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@PaxsonCJRSSSTVW13] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@MohaisenR17] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@MohaisenKR16] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@BenshoofRBH16] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@DuYLDZ16] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@LeverWNDMA16] & & & & & & & & & &\
[@YuWLZ12] & & & & & & & & & &\
DNS Research Methods {#sec:Methods}
====================
This section is devoted to investigating various data analysis methods, utilized to detect, model, and mitigate the aforementioned DNS threats. As it is outlined in , the conducted research works will be categorized under data collection methods, data analysis techniques, and the scope of the analysis. This categorization will help us to better understand the advantages and disadvantages of different methodologies in the DNS security and privacy landscape, which will be an asset for future investigations. The topical classification of the DNS research methods, with sample works, is presented in .
Data Collection Methods
-----------------------
This section will describe two main DNS data collection methods, the passive DNS (PDNS) data and active DNS (ADNS) data, and the associated works.
### Passive DNS
Florian Weimer [@FlorianWeimer] has invented “Passive DNS” or “Passive DNS replication” technology to opportunistically reconstruct a partial view of the data available in the global DNS into a central database for further investigations. End-user’s interactions can be monitored as they happen using passive monitoring [@spring2012impact]. High-level architecture of passive DNS measurement systems is shown in . Passive DNS databases based on valuable information they collect, have been considered as an invaluable asset of cybersecurity researchers to combat a wide range of threats such as malware, botnets, and malicious actors [@AlrwaisLMWWQBM17; @AntonakakisPLVD11; @CallahanAR13; @Tajalizadehkhoob17a; @KountourasKLCND16; @TruongC16; @PerdisciCG12; @LiAXYW13; @BilgeSBKK14; @KintisMLCGPNA17; @KhanHLK15; @HaoW17; @GaoYCPGJD13].
For example, Callahan [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@CallahanAR13] have analyzed 200 million DNS queries collected through passive monitoring of DNS traffic of 90 home residential neighborhood network in the U.S. [@casezone] in order to investigate the evolution and the behavior of the DNS servers and clients in modern DNS systems. Moreover, Gao [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@GaoYCPGJD13] have analyzed 26 billion DNS query-response pairs collected by Security Information Exchange (SIE), now part of DNSDB [@DNSDB], from more than 600 recursive DNS resolvers distributed over North America and Europe, to empirically reexamine the performance and the operational characteristics of the DNS infrastructure. In addition, they found that temporal correlation analysis of the collected passive DNS queries can be used to detect malicious domain names.
![DNS Research Methods. We have categorized DNS research method into data collection methods, data analysis techniques, and analysis scope.[]{data-label="DNSResearchMethods"}](fig/DNSResearchMethods1.pdf){width="40.00000%"}
![High-level architecture of passive DNS collection system. In passive DNS collection, the DNS requests and responses are gathered from DNS providers across the internet as they happen.[]{data-label="fig:PassiveCollection"}](fig/PassiveCollection_R1.pdf){width="45.00000%"}
Hao and Wang [@HaoW17] have studied 1.2 billion trace logs of outgoing DNS queries collected at local DNS servers at the College of William and Mary (WM) and the University of Delaware (UD) to understand the impact of one-time-use domain names on the performance of DNS caching. In addition, Alrwais [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@AlrwaisLMWWQBM17] have analyzed 1.5 TB of passive DNS data collected by monitoring 25 snapshots of the entire IPv4 address space to systematically study the trend of BulletProof Hosting (BPH) services and potential detection and mitigation methods.
Liu [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@LiuLDWLD17] have queried passive DNS data from Farsight Security passive DNS database, DNSDB [@DNSDB], and the biggest public passive DNS system in China [@NetLab] to detect malicious domains. Moreover, Tajalizadehkhoob [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@Tajalizadehkhoob17a] have analyzed 1,259 shared hosting providers extracted from DNSDB[@DNSDB] to explore the distribution of web security features and software patching practices in shared hosting providers.
[l|l]{} **Query Type** & **Definition**\
A & IPv4 address\
AAAA& IPv6 address\
MX & Mail exchanger record\
NS & Authoritative name server\
TXT & Arbitrary text strings\
PTR & Pointer (IP address/hostname)\
SRV & Service (service/hostname)\
SOA & Start of Authority\
CNAME& Canonical Name (Alias/canonical)\
DS & Delegation of Signing\
DNSKEY & DNSSEC public key\
NSEC & Next SECure (No record/two points)\
Furthermore, Khan [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@KhanHLK15] have utilized passive DNS data to study the negative impact of the typosquatting on the users through the time it takes to find the intended website. Kintis [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@KintisMLCGPNA17] have analyzed 13.1 billion passive DNS RRs collected from the largest ISP in the U.S., to understand how combosquatting is used by miscreants for malicious purposes.
Bilge [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@BilgeSBKK14] have analyzed the passive DNS data obtained by SIE [@ISC] to detect and block malicious domain names in real time. In addition, Li [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@LiAXYW13] have investigated the topological relation of hosts and malicious websites using the same PDNS API, SIE [@ISC]. Moreover, Perdisci [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@PerdisciCG12] have utilized the SIE PDNS traffic to detect and track malicious domain-flux networks. Similarly, Truong [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@TruongC16] have analyzed passive DNS traffic for detection of domain-flux botnets within a monitored LAN network.
Although passive DNS data is widely used to study and address to various vulnerabilities of DNS, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}malware, botnets, domain squatting, [[etc.]{}]{} [@GaoYCPGJD13; @HaoW17; @KhanHLK15; @TruongC16], the collection of such data is costly, challenging, and needs restrictive legal agreements [@KountourasKLCND16].
### Active DNS
The concept of active DNS measurement have been presented to tackle the potential barriers of DNS security research. Active DNS measurement cannot be a replacement for passive DNS measurement; however, it offers several advantages in comparison to its counterpart [@KountourasKLCND16]. For example, Internet activities of real users would not fluctuate active measurements. In addition, active DNS measurements could be largely available with least privacy concerns, while it offers an order of magnitude more domain names and IP addresses. Therefore, researchers have developed and used active DNS measurement systems to address DNS security threats [@KhanHLK15; @JonesFPWA16; @KountourasKLCND16; @VanJSP16; @KhalilGNY18; @KintisMLCGPNA17; @ChungR0CLMMW17; @jonker2016measuring]. Generally, active DNS collection systems are composed of four main components: domain seeds, query generator, collection point, and storage. The list of the domains to be queried are gathered in domain seeds. These lists are requested using query generator and the responses are collected at the collection point and then stored in Hadoop cluster for further analysis. High-level architecture of active DNS collection system is shown in .
Kountouras [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@KountourasKLCND16] have presented an active DNS measurement called Thales, which reliably queries, collects, and distills active DNS datasets. A set of large-scale seed domain list including public blacklists [@BHDNS; @DNSBHP; @ZeusT], the Alexa list [@AlexaTop], the Common Crawl dataset [@CommonCrawl], the domain feed from an undisclosed security vendor, and the zone files for the TLDs consisting of .com, .net, .biz and .org constitute the list of seed domains. Moreover, Van Rijswijk-Deij [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@VanJSP16] have presented OpenINTEL, an active DNS measurement system that conducts daily measurement for all of the domains in .com, .net, and .org TLDs. OpenINTEL reliably queries and collects over 50% of the global DNS data based on daily active measurements and since February 2015.
![High-level architecture of a typical active DNS collection system. Active DNS collection is composed of four main steps including gathering domain seeds, generating queries, collecting responses, and storing/processing the data in Hadoop cluster.[]{data-label="ActiveDNS_arch"}](fig/ActiveDNS.pdf){width="46.00000%"}
Moreover, Khan [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@KhanHLK15] have actively crawled 13.5k suspected domains to study the impact of typosquatting events on both typical users and legitimate websites. Kintis [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@KintisMLCGPNA17] have analyzed 455 billion DNS RRs collected daily through the active DNS project [@ActiveDNSProject; @KountourasKLCND16] from November 2015 to August 2016, to investigate how attackers utilize combosquatting to conduct variety of malicious activities including trademark infringement, malware, monetization, and phishing. Moreover, Khalil [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@KhalilGNY18] have conducted an in-depth analysis of active DNS dataset provided by Thales [@ActiveDNSProject; @KountourasKLCND16] to design an association-based scheme for detection of malicious domains with high accuracy and coverage.
Chung [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@ChungR0CLMMW17] have collected all DNSSEC-enabled domain names, under the .com, .org, and .net TLDs through OpenINTEL active DNS measurement system [@VanJSP16], to study the adoption and management of DNSSEC in both authoritative name servers and DNS resolvers. Moreover, Toorn [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@ToornRGS18] have studied the detection of Snowshoe spams through active DNS measurement and using machine learning techniques.
[[.]{}]{} Passive monitoring is better suited as a technology to determine what goes wrong with a website or web application after problems have occurred. Passive DNS, though, is rare, difficult to obtain, and often comes with restrictive legal clauses (i.e., non disclosure agreements). At the same time, laws and regulations against personal identifiable information, the significant financial cost of the passive collection, and storage infrastructure are some of the reasons that make passive DNS difficult. In addition, passive DNS datasets are limited in scope and time. On the other hand, although active DNS datasets offer several unique characteristics, the amount of offered information would be limited. It should be noticed that active DNS measurement highly relies on the domain seeds. In addition, issued DNS queries based on the limited set of hosts yields a localized DNS data collection. In other words, the collected DNS data is limited to the locations of those hosts, thus all IPs associated with a specific given name might not be identified. Furthermore, DNS queries are made by data collectors not by individual users, which makes active DNS data less suitable as an approach to detect malicious domains based on user level features of DNS data, such as user query patterns. The summary of the collected dataset in the literature is in along with the query types description in .
Data Analysis Methods
---------------------
Cybersecurity researchers have employed variety of data analysis techniques to effectively address to DNS threats. For example, the application of machine learning algorithms are widely used [@AlrwaisLMWWQBM17; @AntonakakisDLPLB10; @LiuLDWLD17]. This section introduces some of the prevalent data analysis techniques that have been used in the cybersecurity community, such as machine learning algorithms [@AlrwaisLMWWQBM17; @AntonakakisDLPLB10; @AntonakakisPDLF10; @HaoTPFKGH13; @HaoW17; @KhalilGNY18; @LuoTZSLNM15; @MaSSV09; @RadwanH17; @RahbariniaPA15; @ShulmanW15; @VissersJN15] and association analysis [@YadavRRR10; @HockK16; @KhalilGNY18; @GomezNA17; @GaoYCPGJD13].
### Machine Learning Algorithm
Antonakakis [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@AntonakakisDLPLB10] have designed an Machine Learning (ML)-based cache poisoning detection system, called Anax, which detects malicious changes in cached DNS records in real time with 91.9% of detection accuracy rate. Similarly, Hao and Wang [@HaoW17] have trained Decision Tree (DT) and Random Forest (RF) machine learning algorithms using syntactical features of one-time-use domain names, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}domain name string, the length of query name [[etc.]{}]{}to detect and expel one-time-use domain names from DNS cache in an attempt to increase the performance of DNS caching.
Alrwais [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@AlrwaisLMWWQBM17] have utilized two machine learning algorithms, namely SVM and RF, to build a detetction system to identify malicious network blocks using features extracted from the trends of the BPH services. Khalil [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@KhalilGNY18] have designed a malicious domain detection system using RF model and based on the representative features of dedicated IPs, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}the number of fully qualified domain names, the number of second level domains in its /24 IP block [[etc.]{}]{}
[l|l|c|c|c|c|c|c|l|l]{} & & & &\
& & DT & RF & NB & KNN & SVM & MLP & &\
[@AntonakakisDLPLB10] & Cache poisoning & & & & & & & 91.9% & 0.6%\
[@HaoW17] & Cache poisoning & & & & & & & 88.0% & 1.0%\
[@KhalilGNY18] & Malicious domain & & & & & & & 99.0% & 1.0%\
[@VissersJN15] & Parked domains & & & & & & & 98.7% & 0.5%\
[@AlrwaisLMWWQBM17] & Malicious network & & & & & & & 97.1% & 1.6%\
[@liXFZ13] & Phishing & & & & & & & 95.5% & 3.5%\
Liu [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@LiuLDWLD17] have utilized a set of machine learning models including NN, RF, LR, SVM, and NB to automatically identify shadowed domains with 98.5% accuracy rate. In addition, Vissers [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@VissersJN15] have proposed a parked domain detection system based on RF algorithm that is trained over a set of the generic and robust features of parked domains. Moreover, Li [[*et al.*]{}]{}[@liXFZ13] have used TSVM algorithm instead of classical SVM to improve the detection accuracy for phishing webpages.
### Association Analysis
The strong associations of domains with known malicious domains can be utilized to detect malicious domain names. For example, Khalil [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@KhalilGNY18] have designed an association-based scheme for detection of malicious domains with high accuracy and coverage. Furthermore, Gao [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@GaoYCPGJD13] have utilized the temporal correlation analysis of DNS queries to identify a wide range of correlated malicious domain groups, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}phishing, spam, and DGA-generated domains based on the related known malicious anchor domains. Yadav [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@YadavRRR10] have utilized statistical measures such as Kullback-Leibler divergence, Jaccard index,and Levenshtein for domain-flux botnet detection. Gomez [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@GomezNA17] have studied the application of visualization for understanding the DNS-based network threat analysis.
[[.]{}]{} Despite numerous advantages of machine learning approaches, there are still risks and limitations of using them in operation. The foremost challenge is the acquisition and labeling of relevant data from representative vantage points to maximize insights. Even if the the data is collected correctly, capturing DNS traffic results in a very large amount of data to analyze, which would be expensive in term of computation and storage. In addition, the performance of machine learning algorithms is contingent upon their structure and learning algorithms. It should be noticed that selecting improper structure or learning algorithms might result in poor results; thus, it is mandatory to try different algorithms for each problem. Furthermore, the training phase of the algorithm would be a time-consuming process, even if the dataset is small, requiring training heuristics.
[l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l]{}
Work & & & & & Work & & & &\
[@AdrichemBLWWFK15] & & & & & [@JonesFPWA16] & & & &\
[@AlrwaisLMWWQBM17] & & & & & [@KhalilGNY18] & & & &\
[@AntonakakisDLPLB10] & & & & & [@KhanHLK15] & & & &\
[@AntonakakisPDLF10] & & & & & [@KintisMLCGPNA17] & & & &\
[@AntonakakisPLVD11] & & & & & [@KountourasKLCND16] & & & &\
[@BilgeSBKK14] & & & & & [@LuoTZSLNM15] & & & &\
[@CallahanAR13] & & & & & [@MohaisenGR17] & & & &\
[@CanaliCVK11] & & & & & [@PaxsonCJRSSSTVW13] & & & &\
[@ChenAPNDL14] & & & & & [@PerdisciALL09] & & & &\
[@ChungR0CLMMW17] & & & & & [@PerdisciCG12] & & & &\
[@ChungRCLMMW17] & & & & & [@RadwanH17] & & & &\
[@DuYLDZ16] & & & & & [@RahbariniaPA15] & & & &\
[@fofack2013modeling] & & & & & [@ShulmanW14] & & & &\
[@GaoYCPGJD13] & & & & & [@ShulmanW15] & & & &\
[@HaoTPFKGH13] & & & & & [@ShulmanW17] & & & &\
[@HaoW17] & & & & & [@Tajalizadehkhoob17a] & & & &\
[@HerzbergS13] & & & & & [@TruongC16] & & & &\
[@HerzbergS12] & & & & & [@VanJSP16] & & & &\
[@HerzbergS14] & & & & & [@VissersJN15] & & & &\
[@JalalzaiSI15] & & & & & & & & &\
Data Analysis Scope
-------------------
The original design of the DNS did not consider any security details; instead, it was designed to be a scalable distributed system. As the Internet has grown, malicious actors have found weaknesses, mainly due to lack of DNS records verification, in the DNS system that allows them to launch variety of attacks, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}phishing, malware, [[etc.]{}]{}. Thus DNSSEC was created to secure the DNS infrastructure. In this section, we will categorize the research works from security point of view into vanilla DNS [@SchompCRA14; @DagonPLL08; @XuBSY13; @JacksonBBSB09; @SchompAR14; @DagonAVJL08; @ChenMP15] and DNSSEC [@AdrichemBLWWFK15; @BabuP18; @BauM10; @ChungR0CLMMW17; @ChungRCLMMW17; @HerzbergS13; @HerzbergS12; @HerzbergS14; @JalalzaiSI15]. This will help us to understand the advantages, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}improved security and disadvantages, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}overheads of the deployment of the DNSSEC.
### Vanilla DNS
Although DNS is the largest distributed system, it is vulnerable to multiple threats, such as DNS cache poisoning attacks, amplification attacks, [[etc.]{}]{}. For example, Schomp [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@SchompCRA14] have demonstrated that user-side DNS infrastructure is vulnerable to record injection threats. Moreover, Xu [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@XuBSY13] have demonstrated that attackers can severely abuse DNS-based stealthy C&C channel to efficiently hide malicious DNS activities. In addition, Schomp [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@SchompAR14] have showed that shared DNS resolvers are vulnerable to various forms of attack [@HerzbergS13; @SchompCRA14], [[*e.g.*]{},]{}fraudulent record injection.
In order to address the security problems of the DNS infrastructure, which are mainly due to the lack of integrity and authenticity of DNS records, the utilization of DNSSEC have been suggested [@HerzbergS12; @JalalzaiSI15].
### DNS Security Extension
DNSSEC allows clients to verify the integrity and authenticity of DNS records based on a chain-of-trust. Each zone in DNSSEC is composed of two public and private key pairs, including Key Signing Key (KSK) and Zone Signing Key (ZSK). Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) of the DNSSEC is rooted at the KSK of the DNS root zone. Thus, the validation process of DNS response begins at the root and continues until the record is authenticated. An overview of the DNSSEC chain of trust is shown in .
Chung [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@ChungR0CLMMW17] have conducted a measurement study on deployment and management of DNSSEC in both authoritative name servers and DNS resolvers. They found that only a tiny fraction ($\approx$1%) of all domains in three top TLDs publish DNSKEY, including .com, .net, and .org. Additionally, their results showed that over 30% signed domains fail to upload DS records, highlighting the failure of authoritative name servers in uploading records for a majority of their domain names. Towards the client side of DNSSEC, Lian [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@LianRSS13] have studied the capability of the resolvers and end-users to achieve DNSSEC authentication, and concluded that DNSSEC increases the failure rate of end-to-end resolutions. To categorize the potential root causes of the DNSSEC misconfigurations, Adrichem [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@AdrichemBLWWFK15], have conducted a measurement study to access the impact of misconfigurations on the reachability of zone’s network. Their analysis showed that only 7.93% of gathered domain names from .bg, .br, .co, and .se zones attempted to implement DNSSEC, and over 4% were misconfigured. Furthermore, they observed that the DNSSEC-aware resolvers were unable to reach a large fraction ($\approx$73.86%) of misconfigured domains. The impact of DNSSEC misconfigurations on DNS query requests has also been addressed by Deccio [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@DeccioSKM11], and in general, DNSSEC misconfigurations can be broadly classified into four categories: DNSKEY, RRSIG, general DNS failure, and miscellaneous. shows the categories and the subcategories of DNSSEC misconfigurations [@AdrichemBLWWFK15; @DeccioSKM11].
DNS operators have a critical role in the deployment of DNSSEC, as they are responsible for the maintenance of DNSKEY and RRSIG records. Chung [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@ChungRCLMMW17] have studied the impact of DNS operators, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}registrar, owner, or third-party DNS operator, on DNSSEC deployment. They have observed that many popular registrars fail to support DNSSEC, and as such, there are only 3 mutual registrars among the top 25 popular, and the top 25 fully deployed registrars.
[[.]{}]{} Correct deployment of DNSSEC relies on end-to-end establishment of RRSIGs, a cryptographically valid DNSKEY, and DS records. However, a small fraction of all domains ($\approx$1%) in the top three TLDs (.com, .net, and .org) publish DNSKEY [@ChungR0CLMMW17]. Moreover, incomplete or incorrect deployment of DNSSEC may lead to attacks such as domain hijacking. The threat does not completely mitigate even after full deployment. An adaptive attacker may still succeed in the attack by using a fake name server, that enables off-path traffic analysis and a covert channel [@HerzbergS13]. The hazards of DNSSEC misconfiguration are not limited to the failures; misconfigured domains are always at risk of being unreachable from a DNSSEC-aware resolver.
![Overview of DNSSEC misconfigurations. In general, DNSSEC misconfigurations can be categorized in four groups, including DNSKEY, RRSIG, general DNS failure, and miscellaneous.[]{data-label="fig:DNSSECMisconf"}](fig/DNSSECMisconf.pdf){width="50.00000%"}
DNS Entities Scopes {#sec:Entities}
===================
DNS infrastructure comprises of different entities, including DNS name servers, DNS resolvers, hosting providers, and clients. Each entity is designed to serve a specific task. DNS infrastructure’s performance is contingent upon the collaboration and synchronization of these components. In this section, we survey the prior work to provide deeper insights about the impact of different DNS entities on the overall system. We provide an outline of this section in , and in , we present the topical classification of the DNS entities as addressed in the literature, with sample works.
![DNS Entities Scope. We have categorized research works based on the main scope of the entities into DNS name servers, open DNS resolvers, hosting services, and clients.[]{data-label="fig:DNSEntitiesScope"}](fig/DNSEntitiesScope_2.pdf){width="30.00000%"}
DNS Name Servers
----------------
A DNS server provides name resolution of names into IP addresses, and vice versa. Extensive work has been published to shed light on the name servers’ landscape [@HaoWSS15; @AntonakakisPLVD11; @ChenWRZ07; @ShangW06; @KangJKRM16; @VissersBGJN17; @ShulmanW14; @LiangJDLW13; @GaoYCPGJD13; @MohaisenBL14].
### Authoritative Name Server
An authoritative name server is responsible for answering queries related to a particular domain name in a zone. The server response contains actual DNS records of the queried domain name, such as A, CNAME, PTR, [[etc.]{}]{}, which highlight the importance of the server’s performance and security. List of the common query types are reported in . Hao [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@HaoWSS15] have investigated the characteristics of DNS, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}performance, availability, life-cycle and deployment patterns. In their work, they analyzed three major types of DNS servers namely private, upstream, and hybrid authoritative DNS servers, and showed that a majority of websites host the authoritative DNS servers in upstream services for better performance.
Liang [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@LiangJDLW13] studied the impact of top level DNS servers’ uneven distribution on the end-user latency. They observed that despite good performance of top level DNS severs, the quality of the service was unfair in different continents including Africa and South America. In those regions, the performance was 3–6 times worse than Europe and North America. Furthermore, they made two useful observations:
Almost all the root servers in Europe and North America work efficiently.
Only F, J, and L roots show low query latency in other continents.
Malicious domains can be identified by the number of name servers that a domain name interacts with over time. For instance, Felegyhazi [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@FelegyhaziKP10] have utilized the inherent characteristics of domain registrations and their appearance in DNS zone files to build a proactive malicious domain detection system. Mohaisen [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@MohaisenBL14] presented *Name Server Switching Footprint (NSSF)*, a feature modality and a system that analyze and detect the domain names with suspicious name server switching behavior. Additionally, in the same work, they have designed a time series prediction model to predict the number of name servers that a domain is likely to interact with.
Due to the critical role of the authoritative name servers in DNS infrastructure, they have been analyzed from a security point of view as well. For example, Vissers [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@VissersBGJN17] have investigated the security practices of authoritative name servers, and observed that a large number of domain names ($\approx$1.28M) are under the risk of DoS attacks due to weak security practices of few ($\approx$7,214) authoritative name servers. They also suggested employment of DNSSEC as a solution to enhance the security of DNS. Furthermore, Chung [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@ChungR0CLMMW17] have conducted a measurement study on deployment and management of DNSSEC in both authoritative name servers and resolvers. Their results showed that more than 30% of signed domains failed to upload DS records, and some authoritative name servers failed to upload DS records for nearly all of their domains. Such practices, make DNSSEC ineffective and provide no practical security.
### Recursive DNS server
A recursive DNS server is responsible to query other name servers to resolve a domain name. While recursive DNS resolver is significantly important in the function of DNS, miscreants have exploited it to launch various attacks, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}DNS amplification attack, cache poisoning, [[etc.]{}]{}Accordingly, researchers have explored various aspects of recursive DNS resolvers including, caching performance, DNS amplification attack, malware infection, [[etc.]{}]{} [@ChenWRZ07; @AntonakakisPLVD11; @ChenAPNDL14; @VermaHHHRKF16; @HaoW17]. Chen [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@ChenAPNDL14] have investigated the impact of disposable domains on the caching behavior of the DNS resolvers. Their analysis showed that as the prevalence of the disposable domains increases, it is likely that the DNS cache begins to fill up with RRs, that are unlikely to be reused. Hao and Wang [@HaoW17] have studied the negative impact of one-time-use domain names on the performance of DNS caching. They argue that removal or not insertion of such RRs into the cache can prevent a waste of the DNS cache resources.
Shang [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@ShangW06] explored the relationships across domain names to improve the cache hit rate of local DNS servers. In addition, Chen [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@ChenWRZ07] have presented a dynamic lease scheme that keeps track of local DNS name servers to provide stronger cache consistency and more reliable services. Perdisci [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@PerdisciALL09] have proposed a novel method based on WSEC DNS to mitigate recursive DNS resolvers’ cache poisoning attack.
Ager [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@AgerMSU10] explored the impact of DNS resolvers latency and the DNS cache contents on the performance of local DNS and open DNS resolvers, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}GoogleDNS [@GoogleDNS] and OpenDNS [@OpenDNS]. They further observed that unlike third-party DNS resolvers, local DNS resolvers redirect clients towards the content available within the ISP. Kuhrer [[*et al.*]{}]{}[@KuhrerHBRH15] conducted a large-scale study based on empirical data that is collected over one year, to investigate the landscape of DNS resolvers. Their analysis revealed that millions of these DNS resolvers deliberately manipulate resolutions for malicious purposes.
Verma [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@VermaHHHRKF16] have utilized query rate sharing property of DNS resolvers to build a DNS DDoS mitigation system that calculates global DNS query rate to make mitigation decisions locally. Moreover, Ballani [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@ballaniF16] have analyzed the caching behavior of DNS resolvers to defend against DNS DoS attacks.
[[.]{}]{} Although top level DNS servers perform well, the quality of service is unfair around the globe [@LiangJDLW13]. Moreover, it is noteworthy that the vulnerability of a small number of authoritative name servers, potentially affects a large number of domains under their apex [@VissersBGJN17]. Authoritative name servers are widely exploitable through outdated WHOIS email records of name server domains. Moreover, few authoritative name servers are responsible for incorrect deployment of DNSSEC in large number of domain names[@ChungR0CLMMW17].
Open DNS Resolver
-----------------
Contrary to the recursive DNS resolvers, that perform recursion for the internal clients only, an open DNS resolver resolves recursive DNS lookups for anyone over the Internet. As such, an open DNS resolvers is vulnerable to well known attacks, [[*e.g.*]{},]{}DDoS on behalf of attackers. An overview of recursive DNS resolvers and open DNS resolvers is shown in and , respectively. To this end, extensive research efforts have been devoted to study the impact of open resolvers on the performance and security of DNS infrastructure [@AgerMSU10; @AntonakakisDLPLB10; @ballaniF16; @GaoYCPGJD13; @HerrmannFLF14; @KuhrerHBRH15; @HerzbergS12; @PearceJLEFWP17; @PerdisciALL09; @SchompAR14; @SchompCRA14; @VermaHHHRKF16].
Based on the aforementioned properties of open resolvers, they can be exploited by the attackers to conduct a series of attacks. Significant research has been conducted to understand the DNS resolvers landscape and its associated threats.
### Measurement on the DNS Protocol
Prior work on the analysis of DNS resolvers is mostly focused on a small subset of all resolvers. Therefore, it is unclear if the observations can be generalized on a wider scale to all the resolvers around the globe. For instance, Sisson [@sisson2010dns] analyzed open resolvers based on sampled scans that repeatedly query the same set of resolvers. Therefore, their work was limited to only a small fraction of all the open resolvers. Antonakakis [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@AntonakakisDLPLB10] have analyzed a geographically diverse set of 300,000 open resolvers to measure the integrity of their responses. They observed that in general, the attackers point victims to rogue IP addresses. Furthermore, Jiang [[*et al.*]{}]{}[@JiangLLLDW12] analyzed the caching behavior of resolvers and identified an attack vector in DNS software that allows the extension of domains caching even after their removal from the upper DNS hierarchy.
[llll]{} **Work** & **Year** & **Scope** & **\# ORDNS**\
& 2010& 105.4M IPs & 11.9M\
& 2010& 1.1M IPs & 114.7K\
[@SchompCRA13] & 2013 & IPv4 IPs & 32M\
& 2013 & IPv4 IPs & 32M\
& 2017 & IPv4 IPs & 10.3M\
& 2013 & IPv4 IPs & 11.9M\
& 2017 & IPv4 IPs & 3.7M\
& 2013 & IPv4 IPs & 33.6M\
& 2014 & IPv4 IPs & 29.2M\
[@takano2013measurement] & 2013 & IPv4 IPs & 25M\
Schomp [[*et al.*]{}]{}[@SchompCRA13] randomly probed the IPv4 address space to enumerate DNS resolvers and distinguish between recursive DNS resolvers and DNS proxies. They also performed an in-depth analysis on the caching behavior of the resolvers. Gao [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@GaoYCPGJD13] have analyzed a large set of DNS query-response pairs collected from over 600 recursive DNS resolvers. They observed that despite a great variation in the characteristics of the DNS traffic across networks, the behavior of resolvers within an organization remains similar.
### Internet-Wide Scanning
Durumeric [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@DurumericWH13] proposed a high-speed application to run Internet-wide scans called [*ZMap*]{}. [*ZMap*]{} is an open-source network scanner designed to perform Internet-wide scans with capability of surveying the entire IPv4 address space within 45 minutes. The Open Resolver Project [@Mauch13; @openresolverproject] actively investigates DNS servers world-wide and provides open resolver statistics on the web. The open resolver statistics are available online from March 2013 to January 2017, after which the scan was discontinued. Shadowserver [@shadowserver] is another organization that conducts surveys related to the Internet security including active measurements of open resolvers, with up-to-date scans. Furthermore, Takano [[*et al.*]{}]{}[@takano2013measurement] performed measurements based on responses for Internet-wide DNS software version requests. They have focused on DNS server software and their distribution in each regional Internet registry.
### Threats
Antonakakis [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@AntonakakisDLPLB10] noticed that in general, the attackers point victims to rogue IP addresses through open DNS resolvers. Kuhrer [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@KuhrerHBRH15] have analyzed the threats in open resolvers from two perspectives. Firstly, they scanned the DNS resolvers’ landscape for changes in the course of time and categorized the resolvers based on their device type and the software version. Secondly, they measured the response authenticity of the resolvers from the users’ point-of-view to find that a large number of resolvers intentionally manipulate DNS resolutions for malicious activities.
Schomp [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@SchompCRA14] have measured the vulnerability of the user-side DNS infrastructure to record injection threats. They have found that many open DNS resolvers, that are vulnerable to record injection attacks, are used as an attack vector to target shared DNS infrastructure. Verma [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@VermaHHHRKF16] presented a system to mitigate Amplified DNS DDoS (ADD) attacks, that relies on the fact that DNS resolvers share local DNS query rates that can be used to calculate the total query rates.
![Overview of recursive DNS resolver. Notice that RDNS resolver does not respond to queries of external clients.[]{data-label="RDNS"}](fig/RecursiveResolver.pdf){width="44.00000%"}
![Overview of open recursive DNS resolver. Notice that ORDNS resolver does respond to queries of both internal and external clients.[]{data-label="ODNS"}](fig/OpenResolver.pdf){width="44.00000%"}
Ballani [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@ballaniF16] have presented a defense scheme called stale cache, that uses caching behavior to prevent DNS DoS attacks.They have analyzed DNS traces under multiple DoS attack strategies and have found that the cost-benefit ratio of the proposed method, favors the deployment of stale cache. Furthermore, Herrmann [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@HerrmannFLF14] have studied third party DNS resolvers and consequent threats to online privacy. They proposed a new privacy-preserving name resolution service that relies on the encapsulation of encrypted messages in standards-compliant DNS messages. Hendriks [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@HendriksSRP17] presented an active measurement system to find the list of open DNS resolvers on IPv6 in the wild, which could be potentially exploited in a DDoS attack. Moreover, Schomp [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@SchompAR14] have studied the vulnerabilities of shared DNS resolvers and proposed an unorthodox method to tackle such threats.
[[.]{}]{} DNS resolvers can be easily discovered and used by the attackers for malicious activities, such as DoS attacks. Moreover, buggy implementations and large DNSSEC response filtering can lead to a high query latency[@LiangJDLW13]. Although extensive research has been conducted on open DNS resolvers, their evolution and distribution still require a clear demonstration. Some open questions that are worth addressing in this regard are:
How is the distribution of open DNS resolvers in popular TLDs?
Are open resolvers consistent in answering various clients for the same query type?
[l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l]{}
Work & & & & & Work & & & &\
[@AdrichemBLWWFK15] & & & & & [@LiangJDLW13] & & & &\
[@AgerMSU10] & & & & & [@LuoTZSLNM15] & & & &\
[@AntonakakisDLPLB10] & & & & & [@MaSSV09] & & & &\
[@AntonakakisPLVD11] & & & & & [@PanYC16] & & & &\
[@ballaniF16] & & & & & [@PearceJLEFWP17] & & & &\
[@ChenWRZ07] & & & & & [@PerdisciALL09] & & & &\
[@ChungR0CLMMW17] & & & & & [@QinXWJK14] & & & &\
[@GaoYCPGJD13] & & & & & [@SchompAR14] & & & &\
[@GreschbachPRWF17] & & & & & [@SchompCRA14] & & & &\
[@HaoW17] & & & & & [@SchompRA16] & & & &\
[@HaoWSS15] & & & & & [@ShangW06] & & & &\
[@HerrmannFLF14] & & & & & [@ShulmanW14] & & & &\
[@HerzbergS13] & & & & & [@ShulmanW15] & & & &\
[@HerzbergS12] & & & & & [@Tajalizadehkhoob17a] & & & &\
[@HerzbergS14] & & & & & [@TruongC16] & & & &\
[@JiangLLLDW12] & & & & & [@VermaHHHRKF16] & & & &\
[@KhanHLK15] & & & & & [@VissersBGJN17] & & & &\
[@KuhrerHBRH15] & & & & & [@YuWLZ12] & & & &\
[@LiAXYW13] & & & & & &&&&\
Hosting services
----------------
The task for remedying compromised web resources is shared between hosting providers and webmasters. Shared hosting providers retain more control over configurations, which explains their association with the widespread abuse.
In [@AdrichemBLWWFK15], Adrichem [[*et al.*]{}]{}have conducted measurements to identify and categorize potential causes of the DNSSEC misconfigurations based on the reachability of a zone’s network. They have analyzed domains in six zones, including .bg, .br, .co, .com, .nl and .se, and noticed that a small number of hosting providers are responsible for DNSSEC misconfigured domains. They concluded that the misconfigured domains are at the risk of being unreachable from DNSSEC-aware resolver. DNSSEC allows clients to verify the integrity and authenticity of DNS records. However, DNSSEC has wittnessed a low deployment rate with only 0.6% of .com, 0.8% of .net, and 1% .org properly signed domains [@ChungR0CLMMW17]. Chung [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@ChungR0CLMMW17] have attempted to identify the impact of registrars on deployment of DNSSEC, since the registrars usually serve as DNS operators to their customers. A DNS operator can be a registrar, an owner, or a third-party operator, responsible for maintaining DNSKEY and RRSIG records. Based on the registrars’ policy of uploading records, DNSSEC can be fully deployed (with DS record), or partially deployed (without DS record).
Hao [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@HaoWSS15] have conducted a measurement study to understand the authoritative DNS servers’ deployment patterns in modern web services. They have explored several characteristics DNS servers’ including, performance, availability, and life-cycle of servers. They have heuristically analyzed the Alexa’s top 1-milion list to identify the authoritative DNS deployment patterns in web domains. Their results show that most of the emerging popular social websites host the authoritative DNSes in upstream services that provide performance advantages. Furthermore, they observed that backup and redundant deployment in hybrid patterns provide availability; revealing the growth of cloud providing DNS hosting services. Herzberg [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@HerzbergS14] have studied DNS-amplification DoS attacks, and have proposed a defense system that is compatible with common DNS servers configurations and DNSSEC. The have shown the efficiency and high performance of the presented DNS-authentication method in preventing DNS-based amplification DoS attacks. They have also predicted the adoption of their design, based on game theory algorithms, concluding that their design will sufficiently reduce DNS amplification DoS attacks. Additionally, their proposed method can be deployed as a cloud-based service, that can reduced cost and upgrade defenses for DNS servers.
[[.]{}]{} Cloud services are increasingly popular due to their affordability [@HaoWSS15]. However, they are also subject to DoS attacks, where clients are at risk due to poorly written programs. Clients of shared hosting providers share IP address with other clients, which means that blocking one IP results in blocking all the users. Therefore, the security of cloud services is critical and should be well established.
Client
------
Although, much knowledge about DNS infrastructure has been derived from aggregate population of clients’ behavior analysis, researchers have also emphasized on individual client’s interaction with DNS ecosystem [@KhanHLK15; @KuhrerHBRH15; @LuoTZSLNM15; @PanYC16; @SchompCRA14; @SchompRA16; @GreschbachPRWF17]. For example, Schomp [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@SchompRA16] have analyzed the behavior of individual DNS users in order to develop an analytical model of their interaction with the DNS ecosystem. They observed that different types of users behave uniquely with DNS. In addition, they have demonstrated that the combination of the Weibull and Pareto can successfully model the process of client query arrival. Finally, they observed the existence of a fairly stable and unique working set of names for each client.
Pan [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@PanYC16] have proposed a novel client classification method based on client query entropy and global recursive DNS service architecture. By monitoring the query frequencies of the clients, they have validated the effectiveness of the proposed method on busy and long-tailed clients. They have found that 2.32% clients can cover the most important web spiders, recursive servers, and well-known internet services. Greschbach [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@GreschbachPRWF17] have investigated the impact of DNS traffic on Tor clients’ vulnerability to correlation attacks and how DNS lookups can be utilized for information stealth.
Kuhrer [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@KuhrerHBRH15] have highlighted the vulnerabilities in DNS resolvers by analyzing the changes in their landscape, and the response authenticity of the resolvers from the users’ perspective. They observed that a large number of resolvers intentionally manipulate resolutions for malicious activities.
Khan [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@KhanHLK15] have measured the harm caused to the users by quantitatively measuring the time wasted by typosquatting. They have introduced a new metric that offers several advantages such as empirical quantification of harm to the clients, identification of typosquatting domain names, and proportion of different typosquatting perpetrators. They have analyzed a large scale DNS dataset (active and passive), and noticed that the typosquatting events affect both the users and the websites. Their analysis confirms that typosquatting increases both the time taken by the client to find the intended website, and the latency between a typo and its correction.
Luo [[*et al.*]{}]{} [@LuoTZSLNM15] have analyzed ISP network traces to understand various approaches of the attackers towards the exploitation of DNS for malicious activities. They have taken a variety of syntactic as well as temporal patterns into account to propose a method that identifies different clusters of malicious domain names that lead to DNS failures. Based on their evolutionary learning framework, less suspicious clusters were removed while highly suspicious cases were preserved. Their proposed framework analyzes DNS failures on per-client basis and in practice, they have used their framework on a large-scale ISP network trace to find that over 97% of the users with suspicious DNS activities can be detected with 81% precision.
[[.]{}]{} Clients are usually the main target in cyber crimes, and they suffer from a wide variety of attacks including phishing attacks, DNS manipulation, cybersquatting, [[etc.]{}]{}Existing research in the literature has analyzed the impact of threats on the clients, however, it remains an open challenge to extend the literature for user-intention-based anomaly detection method to identify anomalous DNS traffic.
Conclusion {#sec:Conclusion}
==========
In this paper, a comprehensive study have been conducted to review the ecosystem of DNS from various points of view. Therefore, a large number of peer reviewed and recently published research works have been surveyed and then potential vulnerabilities of DNS security and corresponding countermeasures have been summarized. In addition, we have looked into the research works from two different point of view, namely data analysis methods and DNS entities landscape. In DNS research methods, we have looked into the literature to understand the limitations as well as strengths of utilized data analysis methods which would offer valuable guideline to analyze the existing challenges in DNS ecosystem. The second, DNS entities scope, looks into the role of different entities in DNS infrastructure and points out common vulnerabilities and limitations of existing components of the DNS ecology. Furthermore, in each sub-section we have discussed the challenges and pointed out open research directions.
Acknowledgement
===============
This work is supported in part by National Research Foundation of South Korea under grant NRF-2016K1A1A2912757.
References {#references .unnumbered}
==========
[^1]: xLD refers to the x-th level domain. In http://www.example.com, example.com is a 2nd level domain, and www.example.com is a 3rd level domain.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: |
We consider the single-sink network flow problem. An instance consists of a capacitated graph (directed or undirected), a sink node $t$ and a set of demands that we want to send to the sink. Here demand $i$ is located at a node $s_i$ and requests an amount $d_i$ of flow capacity in order to route successfully. Two standard objectives are to maximise (i) the number of demands (cardinality) and (ii) the total demand (throughput) that can be routed subject to the capacity constraints. Furthermore, we examine these maximisation problems for three specialised types of network flow: unsplittable, confluent and priority flows.
In the [*unsplittable flow*]{} problem, we have edge capacities, and the demand for $s_i$ must be routed on a single path. In the [*confluent flow*]{} problem, we have node capacities, and the final flow must induce a tree. Both of these problems have been studied extensively, primarily in the single-sink setting. However, most of this work imposed the [*no-bottleneck assumption*]{} (that the maximum demand $d_{max}$ is at most the minimum capacity $u_{min}$). Given the no-bottleneck assumption, there is a factor $4.43$-approximation algorithm due to Dinitz et al. [@Dinitz99] for the unsplittable flow problem. Under the even stronger assumption of uniform capacities, there is a factor $3$-approximation algorithm due to Chen et al. [@Chen07] for the confluent flow problem. However, unlike the unsplittable flow problem, a constant factor approximation algorithm cannot be obtained for the single-sink confluent flow problem even [**with**]{} the no-bottleneck assumption. Specifically, we prove that it is hard in that setting to approximate single-sink confluent flow to within $O(\log^{1-\epsilon}(n))$, for any $\epsilon>0$. This result applies for both cardinality and throughput objectives even in undirected graphs.
The remainder of our results focus upon the setting [**without**]{} the no-bottleneck assumption. There, the only result we are aware of is an $\Omega(m^{1-\epsilon})$ inapproximability result of Azar and Regev [@azar2001strongly] for cardinality single-sink unsplittable flow in directed graphs. We prove this lower bound applies to undirected graphs, including planar networks. This is the first super-constant hardness known for undirected single-sink unsplittable flow, and apparently the first polynomial hardness for undirected unsplittable flow even for general (non-single sink) multiflows. We show the lower bound also applies to the cardinality single-sink confluent flow problem.
Furthermore, the proof of Azar and Regev requires exponentially large demands. We show that polynomial hardness continues to hold without this restriction, even if all demands and capacities lie within an arbitrarily small range $[1,1+\Delta]$, for $\Delta > 0$. This lower bound applies also to the throughput objective. This result is very sharp since if $\Delta=0$, then we have an instance of the single-sink maximum edge-disjoint paths problem which can be solved exactly via a maximum flow algorithm. This motivates us to study an intermediary problem, [*priority flows*]{}, that models the transition as $\Delta\rightarrow 0$. Here we have unit-demands, each with a priority level. In addition, each edge has a priority level and a routing path for a demand is then restricted to use edges with at least the same priority level. Our results imply a polynomial lower bound for the maximum priority flow problem, even for the case of uniform capacities.
Finally, we present greedy algorithms that provide upper bounds which (nearly) match the lower bounds for unsplittable and priority flows. These upper bounds also apply for general multiflows.
author:
- 'F. Bruce Shepherd'
- Adrian Vetta
bibliography:
- 'conf.bib'
title: |
The Inapproximability of Maximum Single-Sink\
Unsplittable, Priority and Confluent Flow Problems
---
Introduction
============
In this paper we improve known lower bounds (and upper bounds) on the approximability of the maximization versions of the [*single-sink unsplittable flow*]{}, [*single-sink priority flow*]{} and [*single-sink confluent flow*]{} problems. In the single-sink network flow problem, we are given a directed or undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ with $n$ nodes and $m$ edges that has edge capacities $u(e)$ or node capacities $u(v)$. There are a collection of demands that have to be routed to a unique destination [*sink*]{} node $t$. Each demand $i$ is located at a [*source*]{} node $s_i$ (multiple demands could share the same source) and requests an amount $d_i$ of flow capacity in order to route. We will primarily focus on the following two well-known versions of the single-sink network flow problem:
- [Unsplittable Flow]{}: Each demand $i$ must be sent along a unique path $P_i$ from $s_i$ to $t_i$.
- [Confluent Flow]{}: Any two demands that meet at a node must then traverse identical paths to the sink. In particular, at most one edge out of each node $v$ is allowed to carry flow. Consequently, the support of the flow is a tree in the undirected graphs, and an arborescence rooted at $t$ in directed graphs.
Confluent flows were introduced to study the effects of next-hop routing [@Chen05]. In that application, routers are capacitated and, consequently, nodes in the confluent flow problem are assumed to have capacities but not edges. In contrast, in the unsplittable flow problem it is the edges that are assumed to be capacitated. We follow these conventions in this paper. In addition, we will also examine a third network flow problem called [Priority Flow]{} (defined in Section \[sec:results\]). In the literature, subject to network capacities, there are two standard maximization objectives:
- [Cardinality]{}: Maximize the total number of demands routed.
- [Throughput]{}: Maximize satisfied demand, that is, the total flow carried by the routed demands.
These objectives can be viewed as special cases of the [*profit-maximisation*]{} flow problem. There each demand $i$ has a profit $\pi_i$ in addition to its demand $d_i$. The goal is to route a subset of the demands of maximum total profit. The cardinality model then corresponds to the unit-profit case, $w_i=1$ for every demand $i$; the throughput model is the case $\pi_i=d_i$. Clearly the lower bounds we will present also apply to the more general profit-maximisation problem.
Previous Work {#sec:previous}
-------------
The unsplittable flow problem has been extensively studied since its introduction by Cosares and Saniee [@cosares1994optimization] and Kleinberg [@Kleinberg96]. However, most positive results have relied upon the [*no-bottleneck assumption*]{} ([[nba]{}]{}) where the maximum demand is at most the minimum capacity, that is, $d_{max} \leq u_{min}$. Given the no-bottleneck assumption, the best known result is a factor $4.43$-approximation algorithm due to Dinitz, Garg and Goemans [@Dinitz99] for the maximum throughput objective.
The confluent flow problem was first examined by Chen, Rajaraman and Sundaram [@Chen05]. There, and in variants of the problem [@Chen07; @donovan2007degree; @shepherd2009single], the focus was on uncapacitated graphs.[^1] The current best result for maximum confluent flow is a factor $3$-approximation algorithm for maximum throughput in uncapacitated networks [@Chen07].
Observe that uncapacitated networks (i.e. graphs with uniform capacities) trivially also satisfy the no-bottleneck assumption. Much less is known about networks where the no-bottleneck assumption does [**not**]{} hold. This is reflected by the dearth of progress for the case of multiflows (that is, multiple sink) without the [[nba]{}]{}. It is known that a constant factor approximation algorithm exists for the case in which $G$ is a path [@bonsma2011constant], and that a poly-logarithmic approximation algorithm exists for the case in which $G$ is a tree [@chekuri2009unsplittable]. The extreme difficulty of the unsplittable flow problem is suggested by the following result of Azar and Regev [@azar2001strongly].
\[thm:ar\] If $P \neq NP$ then, for any $\epsilon > 0$, there is no $O(m^{1-\epsilon})$-approximation algorithm for the cardinality objective of the single-sink unsplittable flow problem in directed graphs.
This is the first (and only) super-constant lower bound for the maximum single-sink unsplittable flow problem.
Our Results {#sec:results}
-----------
The main focus of this paper is on single-sink flow problems where the no-bottleneck assumption does not hold. It turns out that the hardness of approximation bounds are quite severe even in the (often more tractable) single-sink setting. In some cases they match the worst case bounds for PIPs (general packing integer programs). In particular, we strengthen Theorem \[thm:ar\] in four ways. First, as noted by Azar and Regev, the proof of their result relies critically on having directed graphs. We prove it holds for undirected graphs, even [*planar*]{} undirected graphs. Second, we show the result also applies to the confluent flow problem.
\[thm:extended\] If $P \neq NP$ then, for any $\epsilon > 0$, there is no $O(m^{1-\epsilon})$-approximation algorithm for the cardinality objective of the single-sink unsplittable and confluent flow problems in undirected graphs. Moreover for unsplittable flows, the lower bound holds even when we restrict to planar inputs.
Third, Theorems \[thm:ar\] and \[thm:extended\] rely upon the use of exponentially large demands – we call this the [*large demand regime*]{}. A second demand scenario that has received attention in the literature is the [*polynomial demand regime*]{} – this regime is studied in [@guruswami2003near], basically to the exclusion of the large demand regime. We show that strong hardness results apply in the polynomial demand regime; in fact, they apply to the [*small demand regime*]{} where the [*demand spread*]{} $\frac{d_{max}}{d_{min}} = 1+\Delta$, for some “small” $\Delta > 0$. (Note that $d_{min} \leq u_{min}$ and so the demand spread of an instance is at least the [*bottleneck value*]{} $\frac{d_{max}}{u_{min}}$.) Fourth, by considering the case where $\Delta > 0$ is arbitrarily small we obtain similar hardness results for the throughput objective for the single-sink unsplittable and confluent flow problems. Formally, we show the following $m^{\frac12 - \epsilon}$-inapproximability result. We note however that the hard instances have a linear number of edges (so one may prefer to call this an $n^{\frac12-\epsilon}$-inapproximability result).
\[thm:hard\] Neither cardinality nor throughput can be approximated to within a factor of $O(m^{\frac12-\epsilon})$, for any $\epsilon > 0$, in the single-sink unsplittable and confluent flow problems. This holds for undirected and directed graphs even when instances are restricted to have demand spread $\frac{d_{max}}{d_{min}}=1 + \Delta$, where $\Delta > 0$ is arbitrarily small.
Again for the unsplittable flow problem this hardness result applies even in planar graphs. Theorems \[thm:extended\] and \[thm:hard\] are the first super-constant hardness for any undirected version of the single-sink unsplittable flow problem, and any directed version with small-demands. We also remark that the extension to the small-demand regime is significant as suggested by the sharpness of the result. Specifically, suppose $\Delta=0$ and, thus, the demand spread is one. We may then scale to assume that $d_{max}=d_{min}=1$. Furthermore, we may then round down all capacities to the nearest integer as any fractional capacity cannot be used. But then the single-sink unsplittable flow problem can be solved easily in polynomial time by a max-flow algorithm!
To clarify what is happening in the change from $\Delta>0$ to $\Delta=0$, we introduce and examine an intermediary problem, the [*maximum priority flow problem*]{}. Here, we have a graph $G=(V,E)$ with a sink node $t$, and demands from nodes $s_i$ to $t$. These demand are unit-demands, and thus $\Delta=0$. However, a demand may not traverse every edge. Specifically, we have a partition of $E$ into priority classes $E_i$. Each demand also has a [*priority*]{}, and a demand of priority $i$ may only use edges of priority $i$ or better (i.e., edges in $E_1 \cup E_2 \cup \ldots E_i$). The goal is to find a maximum routable subset of the demands. Observe that, for this unit-demand problem, the throughput and cardinality objectives are identical. Whilst various priority network design problems have been considered in the literature (cf. [@charikar2004resource; @chuzhoy2008approximability]), we are not aware of existing results on maximum priority flow. Our results immediately imply the following.
\[cor:priority\] The single-sink maximum priority flow problem cannot be approximated to within a factor of $m^{\frac12-\epsilon}$, for any $\epsilon > 0$, in planar directed or undirected graphs.
The extension of the hardness results for single-sink unsplittable flow to undirected graphs is also significant since it appears to have been left unnoticed even for general multiflow instances. In [@guruswami2003near]: “...[*the hardness of undirected edge-disjoint paths remains an interesting open question. Indeed, even the hardness of edge-capacitated unsplittable flow remains open”*]{}[^2] Our result resolves this question by showing polynomial hardness (even for single-sink instances). We emphasize that this is not the first super-constant hardness for general multiflows however. A polylogarithmic lower bound appeared in [@andrews2006logarithmic] for the maximum edge-disjoint paths (MEDP) problem (this was subsequently extended to the regime where edge congestion is allowed [@andrews2010inapproximability]). Moreover, a polynomial lower bound for MEDP seems less likely given the recent $O(1)$-congestion polylog-approximation algorithms [@chuzhoy2012routing; @chuzhoy2012polylogarithimic]. In this light, our hardness results for single-sink unsplittable flow again highlight the sharp threshold involved with the no-bottleneck assumption. That is, if we allow some slight variation in demands and capacities within a tight range $[1,1+\Delta]$ we immediately jump from (likely) polylogarithmic approximations for MEDP to (known) polynomial hardness of the corresponding maximum unsplittable flow instances.
We next note that Theorems \[thm:ar\] and \[thm:extended\] are stronger than Theorem \[thm:hard\] in the sense that they have exponents of $1-\epsilon$ rather than $\frac12-\epsilon$. Again, this extra boost is due to their use of exponential demand sizes. One can obtain a more refined picture as to how the hardness of cardinality single-sink unsplittable/confluent flow varies with the demand sizes, or more precisely how it varies on the bottleneck value $\frac{d_{max}}{u_{min}}$.[^3] Specifically, combining the approaches used in Theorems \[thm:extended\] and \[thm:hard\] gives:
\[thm:harder\] Consider any fixed $\epsilon > 0$ and $d_{max}/u_{min} > 1$. It is NP-hard to approximate cardinality single-sink unsplittable/confluent flow to within a factor of $O(m^{\frac12-\epsilon}\cdot \sqrt{\log (\frac{d_{max}}{u_{min}})})$ in undirected or directed graphs. For unsplittable flow, this remains true for planar graphs.
Once again we see the message that there is a sharp cutoff for $d_{max}/u_{min} > 1$ even in the large-demand regime. This is because if the bottleneck value is at most $1$, then the no-bottleneck assumption holds and, consequently, the single-sink unsplittable flow problem admits a constant-factor approximation (not $\sqrt{m}$ hardness). We mention that a similar hardness bound cannot hold for the maximum throughput objective, since one can always reduce to the case where $d_{max}/u_{min}$ is small with a polylogarithmic loss, and hence the lower bound becomes at worst $O(m^{\frac12-\epsilon}\cdot \log m)$. We feel the preceding hardness bound is all the more interesting since known greedy techniques yield almost-matching upper bounds, even for general multiflows.
\[thm:upper\] There is an $O(\sqrt{m}\log (\frac{d_{max}}{u_{min}}))$ approximation algorithm for cardinality unsplittable flow and an $O(\sqrt{m}\log n)$ approximation algorithm for throughput unsplittable flow, in both directed and undirected graphs.
We next present one hardness result for confluent flows assuming the no-bottleneck-assumption. Again, recall that for the maximum single-sink unsplittable flow problem there is a constant factor approximation algorithm given the no-bottleneck-assumption. We prove this is not the case for the single-sink confluent flow problem by providing a super-constant lower bound. Its proof is more complicated but builds on the techniques used for our previous results.
\[thm:hardnba\] Given the no-bottleneck assumption, the single-sink confluent flow problem cannot be approximated to within a factor $O(\log^{1-\epsilon}n)$, for any $\epsilon > 0$, unless $P=NP$. This holds for both the maximum cardinality and maximum throughput objectives in undirected and directed graphs.
Finally, we include a hardness result for the congestion minimization problem for confluent flows. That is, the problem of finding the minimum value $\alpha \geq 1$ such that all demands can be routed confluently if all node capacities are multiplied by $\alpha$. This problem has two plausible variants.
An [*$\alpha$-congested*]{} routing is an unsplittable flow for the demands where the total load on any node is at most $\alpha$ times its associated capacity. A [*strong congestion*]{} algorithm is one where the resulting flow must route on a tree $T$ such that for any demand $v$ the nodes on its path in $T$ must have capacity at least $d(v)$. A [*weak congestion*]{} algorithm does not require this extra constraint on the tree capacities. Both variants are of possible interest. If the motive for congestion is to route all demands in some limited number $\alpha$ of rounds of admission, then each round should be feasible on $T$ - hence strong congestion is necessary. On the other hand, if the objective is to simply augment network capacity so that all demands can be routed, weak congestion is the right notion. In Section \[sec:congestion\] we show that it is hard to approximate strong congestion to within polynomial factors.
\[thm:strongcongestion\] It is NP-hard to approximate the minimum (strong) congestion problem for single-sink confluent flow instances (with polynomial-size demands) to factors of at most $m^{.5-\epsilon}$ for any $\epsilon>0$.
Overview of Paper
-----------------
At the heart of our reductions are gadgets based upon the [*capacitated*]{} $2$-disjoint paths problem. We discuss this problem in Section \[sec:two-disjoint-paths\]. In Section \[sec:lower\], we prove the $\sqrt{m}$ hardness of maximum single-sink unsplittable/confluent flow in the small demand regime (Theorem \[thm:hard\]); we give a similar hardness for single-sink priority flow (Corollary \[cor:priority\]). Using a similar basic construction, we prove, in Section \[sec:confwithNBA\], the logarithmic hardness of maximum single-sink confluent flow even given the no-bottleneck assumption (Theorem \[thm:hardnba\]). In Section \[sec:stronger\], we give lower bounds on the approximability of the cardinality objective for general demand regimes (Theorems \[thm:extended\] and \[thm:harder\]). Finally, in Section \[sec:upper\], we present an almost matching upper bound for unsplittable flow (Theorem \[thm:upper\]). and priority flow.
The Two-Disjoint Paths Problem {#sec:two-disjoint-paths}
==============================
Our hardness reductions require gadgets based upon the [*capacitated*]{} $2$-disjoint paths problem. Before describing this problem, recall the classical $2$-disjoint paths problem:\
[2-Disjoint Paths (Uncapacitated):]{} Given a graph $G$ and node pairs $\{x_1, y_1\}$ and $\{x_2, y_2\}$. Does $G$ contain paths $P_1$ from $x_1$ to $y_1$ and $P_2$ from $x_2$ to $y_2$ such that $P_1$ and $P_2$ are disjoint?\
Observe that this formulation incorporates four distinct problems because the graph $G$ may be directed or undirected and the desired paths may be edge-disjoint or node-disjoint. In undirected graphs the $2$-disjoint paths problem, for both edge-disjoint and node disjoint paths, can be solved in polynomial time – see Robertson and Seymour [@RS95]. In directed graphs, perhaps surprisingly, the problem is NP-hard. This is the case for both edge-disjoint and node disjoint paths, as shown by Fortune, Hopcroft and Wyllie [@FHW80].
In general, the unsplittable and confluent flow problems concern capacitated graphs. Therefore, our focus is on the capacitated version of the $2$-disjoint paths problem.\
[2-Disjoint Paths (Capacitated):]{} Let $G$ be a graph whose edges have capacity either $\a$ or $\b$, where $\b \ge \a$. Given node pairs $\{x_1, y_1\}$ and $\{x_2, y_2\}$, does $G$ contain paths $P_1$ from $x_1$ to $y_1$ and $P_2$ from $x_2$ to $y_2$ such that:\
(i) $P_1$ and $P_2$ are disjoint.\
(ii) $P_2$ may only use edges of capacity $\b$. ($P_1$ may use both capacity $\a$ and capacity $\b$ edges.)\
For directed graphs, the result of Fortune et al. [@FHW80] immediately implies that the capacitated version is hard – simply assume every edge has capacity $\beta$. In undirected graphs, the case of node-disjoint paths was proven to be hard by Guruswami et al. [@guruswami2003near]. The case of edge-disjoint paths was recently proven to be hard by Naves, Sonnerat and Vetta [@naves2010maximum], even in planar graphs where terminals lie on the outside face (in an interleaved order, which will be important for us). These results are summarised in Table \[table:hardness\].
Directed Undirected
--------------- ------------------ ------------------------------
Node-Disjoint NP-hard [@FHW80] NP-hard [@guruswami2003near]
Edge-Disjoint NP-hard [@FHW80] NP-hard [@naves2010maximum]
: Hardness of the Capacitated 2-Disjoint Paths Problem[]{data-label="table:hardness"}
Recall that the unsplittable flow problem has capacities on edges, whereas the confluent flow problem has capacities on nodes. Consequently, our hardness reductions for unsplittable flows require gadgets based upon the hardness for edge-disjoint paths [@naves2010maximum]; for confluent flows we require gadgets based upon the hardness for node-disjoint paths [@guruswami2003near].
Polynomial Hardness of Single-Sink Unsplittable,\
Confluent and Priority Flow {#sec:lower}
=================================================
In this section, we establish that the single-sink maximum unsplittable and confluent flow problems are hard to approximate within polynomial factors for both the cardinality and throughput objectives. We will then show how these hardness results extend to the single-sink maximum priority flow problem. We begin with the small demand regime by proving Theorem \[thm:hard\]. Its proof introduces some core ideas that are used in later sections in the proofs of Theorems \[thm:harder\] and \[thm:hardnba\].
$\sqrt{n}$-Hardness in the Small Demand Regime {#sec:hardness}
----------------------------------------------
Our approach uses a grid routing structure much as in the hardness proofs of Guruswami et al. [@guruswami2003near]. Specifically:
\(1) We introduce a graph $G_N$ that has the following properties. There is a set of pairwise crossing paths that can route demands of total value, $\sum_{i=1}^{N} (1+ i \delta) =N + \delta \frac12 N(N+1)$. On the other hand, any collection of pairwise non-crossing paths can route at most $d_{max} = 1+N\delta$ units of the total demand. For a given $\Delta \in (0,1)$ we choose $\delta$ to be small enough so that $d_{max} \leq 1+\Delta < 2$.
\(2) We then build a new network $\mathcal{G}$ by replacing each node of $G_N$ by an instance of the capacitated $2$-disjoint paths problem. This routing problem is chosen because it induces the following properties. If it is a YES-instance, then a maximum unsplittable (or confluent) flow on $\mathcal{G}$ corresponds to routing demands in $G_N$ using pairwise-crossing paths. In contrast, if it is a NO-instance, then a maximum unsplittable or confluent flow on $\mathcal{G}$ corresponds to routing demands in $G_N$ using pairwise non-crossing paths.
Since $G_N$ contains $n=O(N^2)$ nodes, it follows that an approximation algorithm with guarantee better than $\Theta(\sqrt{n})$ allows us to distinguish between YES- and NO-instances of our routing problem, giving an inapproximability lower bound of $\Omega(\sqrt n)$. Furthermore, at all stages we show how this reduction can be applied using only undirected graphs. This will prove Theorem \[thm:hard\].
### A Half-Grid Graph $G_N$
![\[fig.grid\] A Half-Grid $G_N$.](halfgrid.pdf){height="12cm"}
Let’s begin by defining the graph $G_N$. There are $N$ rows (numbered from top to bottom) and $N$ columns (numbered from left to right). We call the leftmost node in the $i^{th}$ row $s_i$, and the bottom node in the $j^{th}$ column $t_j$. There is a demand of size ${c_{i}} := 1+i\delta$ located at $s_i$. Recall, that $\delta$ is chosen so that all demands and capacities lie within a tight range $[1,1+\Delta]$ for fixed $\Delta$ small. All the edges in the $i^{th}$ row and all the edges in the $i^{th}$ column have capacity ${c_{i}}$. The $i^{th}$ row extends as far as the $i^{th}$ column and vice versa; thus, we obtain a “half-grid" that is a weighted version of the network considered by Guruswami et al. [@guruswami2003near]. Finally we add a sink $t$. There is an edge of capacity ${c_{j}}$ between $t_j$ to $t$. The complete construction is shown in Figure \[fig.grid\].
For the unsplittable flow problem we have edge capacities. We explain later how the node capacities are incorporated for the confluent flow problem. We also argue about the undirected and directed reductions together. For directed instances we always enforce edge directions to be downwards and to the right. Note that there is a unique $s_i-t$ path $P^*_i$ consisting only of edges of capacity ${c_{i}}$, that is, the hooked path that goes from $s_i$ along the $i^{th}$ row and then down the $i^{th}$ column to $t$. We call this the [*canonical*]{} path for demand $i$.
\[cl:cross\] Take two feasible paths $Q_i$ and $Q_j$ for demands $i$ and $j$. If $i<j$, then the paths must cross on row $j$, between columns $i$ and $j-1$.
[**Proof.**]{} Consider demand $i$ originating at $s_i$. This demand cannot use any edge in columns $1$ to $i-1$ as it is too large. Consequently, any feasible path $Q_i$ for demand $i$ must include all of row $i$. Similarly, $Q_j$ must contain all of row $j$. Row $j$ cuts off $s_i$ from the sink $t$, so $Q_i$ must meet $Q_j$ on row $j$. Demand $i$ cannot use an edge in row $j$ as demand $j$ is already using up all the capacity along that row. Thus $Q_i$ crosses $Q_j$ at the point they meet. As above, this meeting cannot occur in columns $1$ to $i-1$. Thus the crossing point must occur on some column between $i$ and $j-1$ (by construction of the half-grid, column $j$ only goes as high as row $j$ so the crossing cannot be there). [$\hfill{\Box}$]{}
By Claim \[cl:cross\], if we are forced to route using pairwise non-crossing paths, then only one demand can route. Thus we can route at most a total of ${c_{N}}=1+\delta N<2$ units of demand.
### The Instance $\mathcal{G}$
We build a new instance $\mathcal{G}$ by replacing each degree $4$ node in $G_N$ with an instance of the $2$ - disjoint paths problem. For the unsplittable flow problem in undirected graphs we use gadgets $H$ corresponding to the capacitated edge-disjoint paths problem. Observe that a node at the intersection of column $i$ and row $j$ (with $j > i$) in $G_N$ is incident to two edges of capacity ${c_{i}}$ and to two edges of weight ${c_{j}}$. We construct $\mathcal{G}$ by replacing each such node of degree four with the routing graph $H$. We do this in such a way that the capacity ${c_{i}}$ edges of $G_N$ are incident to $x_1$ and $y_1$, and the ${c_{j}}$ edges are incident to $x_2$ and $y_2$. We also let $\a={c_{i}}$ and $\b={c_{j}}$.
For the confluent flow problem in undirected graphs we now have node capacities. Hence we use gadgets $H$ corresponding to the node-capacitated 2-paths problem discussed above. Again $x_1$ and $y_1$ are given capacity ${c_{i}}$ whilst $x_2$ and $y_2$ have capacity ${c_{j}}$.
For directed graphs, the mechanism is simpler as the gadgets may now come from the uncapacitated disjoint paths problem. Thus the hardness comes from the directedness and not from the capacities. Specifically, we may set the edge capacities to be $C=\max\{{c_{i}},{c_{j}}\}$. Moreover, for unsplittable flow we may perform the standard operation of splitting each node in $H$ into two, with the new induced arc having capacity of $C$. It follows that if there are two flow paths through $H$, each carrying at least ${c_{i}} \geq {c_{j}}$ flow, then they must be from $x_1$ to $y_1$ and $x_2$ to $y_2$. These provide a solution to the node-disjoint directed paths problem in $H$.
The hardness result will follow once we see how this construction relates to crossing and non-crossing collections of paths.
\[lem:yes\] If $H$ is a YES-instance, then the maximum unsplittable/confluent flow in $\mathcal{G}$ has value at least $N$. For a NO-instance the maximum unsplittable/confluent flow has value at most $1+\Delta < 2$.
[**Proof.**]{} If $H$ is a YES-instance, then we can use its paths to produce paths in $\mathcal{G}$, whose images in $G_N$, are free to cross at any node. Hence we can produce paths in $\mathcal{G}$ whose images are the canonical paths $P^*_i, \, 1 \le i \le N$ in $G_N$. This results in a flow of value greater than $N$. Note that in the confluent case, these paths yield a confluent flow as they only meet at the root $t$.
Now suppose $H$ is a NO-instance. Take any flow and consider two paths $\hat{Q}_i$ and $\hat{Q}_j$ in $\mathcal {G}$ for demands $i$ and $j$, where $i < j$. These paths also induce two feasible paths $Q_i$ and $Q_j$ in the half-grid $G_N$. By Claim \[cl:cross\], these paths cross on row $j$ of the half-grid (between columns $i$ and $j-1$). In the directed case (for unsplittable or confluent flow) if they cross at a grid-node $v$, then the paths they induce in the copy of $H$ at $v$ must be node-disjoint. This is not possible in the directed case since such paths do not exist for $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$.
In the undirected confluent case, we must also have node-disjoint paths through this copy of $H$. As we are in row $j$ and a column between column $i$ and $j-1$, we have $\b={c_{j}}$ and ${c_{i}} \le \a \le {c_{j-1}}$. Thus, demand $j$ can only use the $\b$-edges of $H$. This contradicts the fact that $H$ is a NO-instance. For the undirected case of unsplittable flow the two paths through $H$ need to be edge-disjoint, but now we obtain a contradiction as our gadget was derived from the capacitated edge-disjoint paths problem.
It follows that no such pair $\hat{Q}_i$ and $\hat{Q}_j$ can exist and, therefore, the confluent/unsplittable flow routes at most one demand and, hence, routes a total demand of at most $1+\Delta$. [$\hfill{\Box}$]{}
We then obtain our hardness result.\
[[**Theorem \[thm:hard\].**]{} *Neither cardinality nor throughput can be approximated to within a factor of $O(m^{\frac12-\epsilon})$, for any $\epsilon > 0$, in the single-sink unsplittable and confluent flow problems. This holds for undirected and directed graphs even when instances are restricted to have bottleneck value $\frac{d_{max}}{u_{min}}=1 + \Delta$ where $\Delta > 0$ is arbitrarily small.\
*]{}
[**Proof.**]{} It follows that if we could approximate the maximum (unsplittable) confluent flow problem in $\mathcal{G}$ to a factor better than $N$, we could determine whether the optimal solution is at least $N$ or at most $1+\Delta$. This in turn would allow us to determine whether $H$ is a YES- or a NO-instance.
Note that $\mathcal{G}$ has $n=\Theta(pN^2)$ edges, where $p=|V(H)|$. If we take $N = \Theta(p^{\frac12(\frac{1}{\epsilon}-1)})$, where $\epsilon>0$ is an (arbitrarily) small constant, then $n=p^{\frac{1}{\epsilon}}$ and so $N = \Theta(n^{\frac12 (1-\epsilon)})$. A precise lower bound of $n^{.5 - \epsilon'}$ is obtained for $\epsilon' > \epsilon$ sufficiently small, when $n$ is sufficiently large. [$\hfill{\Box}$]{}
### Priority Flows and Congestion {#sec:congestion}
We now show the hardness of priority flows. To do this, we use the same half-grid construction, except we must replace the capacities by priorities. This is achieved in a straight-forward manner: priorities are defined by the magnitude of the original demands/capacities. The larger the demand or capacity in the original instance, the higher its priority in the new instance. (Given the priority ordering we may then assume all demands and capacities are set to $1$.) In this setting, observe that Claim \[cl:cross\] also applies for priority flows.
Consider two feasible paths $Q_i$ and $Q_j$ for demands $i$ and $j$ in the priority flow problem. If $i<j$, then the paths must cross on row $j$, between columns $i$ and $j-1$.
[**Proof.**]{} Consider demand $i$ originating at $s_i$. This demand cannot use any edge in columns $1$ to $i-1$ as they do not have high enough priority. Consequently, any feasible path $Q_i$ for demand $i$ must include all unit capacity edges of row $i$. Similarly, $Q_j$ must contain all of row $j$. Row $j$ cuts off $s_i$ from the sink $t$, so $Q_i$ must meet $Q_j$ on row $j$. Demand $i$ cannot use an edge in row $j$ as demand $j$ is already using up all the capacity along that row. Thus $Q_i$ crosses $Q_j$ at the point they meet. As above, this meeting cannot occur in columns $1$ to $i-1$. Thus the crossing point must occur on some column between $i$ and $j-1$. [$\hfill{\Box}$]{}
Repeating our previous arguments, we obtain the following hardness result for priority flows. (Again, it applies to both throughput and cardinality objectives as they coincide for priority flows.)
[[**Corollary \[cor:priority\].**]{} *The maximum single-sink priority flow problem cannot be approximated to within a factor of $m^{\frac12-\epsilon}$, for any $\epsilon > 0$, in planar directed or undirected graphs. [$\hfill{\Box}$]{}*]{}
We close the section by establishing Theorem \[thm:strongcongestion\]. Consider grid instance built from a YES instance of the 2 disjoint path problem. As before we may find a routing of all demands with congestion at most $1$. Otherwise, suppose that the grid graph is built from a NO instance and consider a tree $T$ returned by a strong congestion algorithm. As it is a strong algorithm, the demand in row $i$ must follow its canonical path horizontally to the right as far as it can. As it is a confluent flow, all demands from rows $>i$ must accumulate at this rightmost node in row $i$. Inductively this implies that the total load at the rightmost node in row 1 has load $>N$. As before, for any $\epsilon > 0$ we may choose $N$ sufficiently large so that $N \geq n^{.5-\epsilon}$. Hence we have a YES instance of 2 disjoint paths if and only if the output from a $n^{.5-\epsilon}$-approximate strong congestion algorithm returns a solution with congestion $\leq N$.
Logarithmic Hardness of Single-Sink Confluent Flow with the No-Bottleneck Assumption {#sec:confwithNBA}
====================================================================================
We now prove the logarithmic hardness of the confluent flow problem given the no-bottleneck assumption. A similar two-step plan is used as for Theorem \[thm:hard\] but the analysis is more involved.
\(1) We introduce a planar graph $G_N$ which has the same structure as our previous half-grid, except that its edge weights are changed. As before we have demands associated with the $s_i$’s, but we assume these demands are tiny – this guarantees that the no-bottleneck assumption holds. We thus refer to the demands located at an $s_i$ as the [*packets*]{} from $s_i$. We define $G_N$ to ensure that there is a collection of pairwise crossing “trees” (to be defined) that can route packets of total value equal to the harmonic number $H_N\approx \log N$. On the other hand, any collection of pairwise non-crossing trees can route at most one unit of packet demand. (2) We then build a new network $\mathcal{G}$ by replacing each node of $G_N$ by an instance of the $2$-disjoint paths problem. Again, this routing problem is chosen because it induces the following properties. If it is a YES-instance, then we can find a routing that corresponds to pairwise crossing trees. Hence we are able to route $H_N$ demand. In contrast, if it is a NO-instance, then a maximum confluent flow on $\mathcal{G}$ is forced to route using a non-crossing structure and this forces the total flow to be at most $1$.
It follows that an approximation algorithm with guarantee better than logarithmic would allow us to distinguish between YES- and NO-instances of our routing problem, giving a lower bound of $\Omega(\log N)$. We will see that this bound is equal to $\Theta(\log^{1-\epsilon} n)$.
[An Updated Half-Grid Graph.]{}
-------------------------------
\
Again we take the graph $G_N$ with $N$ rows (now numbered from bottom to top) and $N$ columns (now numbered from right to left). All the edges in the $i^{th}$ row and all the edges in the $i^{th}$ column have capacity $\frac{1}{i}$. The $i^{th}$ row extends as far as the $i^{th}$ column and vice versa; thus, we obtain a half-grid similar to our earlier construction but with updated weights. Then we add a sink $t$. There is an edge of capacity $\frac{1}{i}$ to $t$ from the bottom node (called $t_i$) in column $i$. Finally, at the leftmost node (called $s_i$) in row $i$ there is a collection of packets (“sub-demands”) whose total weight is $\frac{1}{i}$. These packets are very small. In particular, they are much smaller than $\frac{1}{n}$, so they satisfy the no-bottleneck assumption. The complete construction is shown in Figure \[fig.grid2\]. In the directed setting, edges are oriented to the right and downwards.
![\[fig.grid2\] An Updated [[nba]{}]{} Half-Grid $G_N$.](halfgrid2.pdf){height="10cm"}
Again, there is a unique $s\mbox{-}t$ path $P^*_i$ consisting only of edges of weight $\frac{1}{i}$, that is, the hooked path that goes from $s_i$ along the $i$th row and then down the $i^{th}$ column to $t$. Moreover, for $i \neq j$, the path $P^*_i$ intersects $P^*_j$ precisely once. If we route packets along the paths $\mathcal{P}^*=\{P^*_1,P^*_2,\dots,P^*_N\}$, then we obtain a flow of total value $H_N
=1+\frac12+\ldots \frac{1}{N}$. Since every edge incident to $t$ is used in $\mathcal{P}^*$ with its maximum capacity, this solution is a maximum single-sink flow. Clearly, each $P^*_i$ is a tree, so this routing corresponds to our notion of routing on “crossing trees”.
We then build $\mathcal{G}$ as before by replacing the degree four nodes in the grid by our disjoint-paths gadgets. Our first objective is to analyze the maximum flow possible in the case where our derived instance $\mathcal{G}$ is made from NO-instances. Consider a confluent flow in $\mathcal{G}$. If we contract the pseudo-nodes, this results in some [*leaf-to-root*]{} paths in the subgraph $G_N$. We define $T_i$ as the union of all such leaf-to-root paths terminating at $t_i$. If we have a NO-instance, then the resulting collection $\mathcal{T}=\{T_1,T_2,\dots,T_N\}$ forms non-crossing subgraphs. That is, if $i \neq j$, then there do not exist leaf-to-root paths $P_i \in T_i$ and $P_j \in T_j$ which cross in the standard embedding of $G_N$. Since we started with a confluent flow in $\mathcal{G}$, the flow paths within each $T_i$ are [*edge-confluent*]{}. That is, when two flow paths share an [**edge**]{}, they must thereafter follow the same path to $t_i$. Note that they could meet and diverge at a node if they use different incoming and outgoing edges. In the following, we identify the subgraph $T_i$ with its edge-confluent flow. The [*capacity*]{} of a $T_i$ is the maximum flow from its leaves to $t_i$. The capacity of a collection $\mathcal{T}$ is then the sum of these capacities. We first prove that the maximum value of a flow (i.e., capacity) is significantly reduced if we require a non-crossing collection of edge-confluent flows. One should note that as our demands are tiny, we may essentially route any partial amount $x \leq \frac{1}{i}$ from a node $s_i$; we cannot argue as though we route the whole $\frac{1}{i}$. On the other hand, any packets from $s_i$ must route on the same path, and in particular $s_i$ lies in a unique $T_j$ (or none at all). Another subtlety in the proof is to handle the fact that we cannot apriori assume that there is at most one leaf $s_j$ in a $T_i$. Hence such a flow does not just correspond to a maximum uncrossed unsplittable flow. In fact, because the packets are tiny, it is easy to verify that all the packets may be routed unsplittably (not confluently) even if they are required to use non-crossing paths.
\[lemma.maxflow\] The maximum capacity of a non-crossing edge-confluent flow in $G_N$ is at most $2$.
[**Proof.**]{} Let $t_{i_1},t_{i_2},...,t_{i_k}$ be the roots of the subgraphs $T_i$ which support the edge-confluent flow, where wlog $i_1 > i_2 > \cdots >i_k$. We argue inductively about the topology of where these supports live in $G_N$. For $i \leq j$ we define a subgrid $G(i,j)$ of $G_N$ induced by columns and rows whose indices lie in the range $[i,j]$. For instance, the rightmost column of $G(i,j)$ has capacity $\frac{1}{i}$ and the leftmost column $\frac{1}{j}$; similarly, the lowest row of $G(i,j)$ has capacity $\frac{1}{i}$ and the highest row $\frac{1}{j}$.
Obviously all the $T_i$’s route in $G(1,N)=G(r_1,\ell_1)$ where we define $r_1=1,\ell_1=N$. Consider the topologically highest path $P_{i_1}$ in $T_{i_1}$, and let $r'_1$ be the highest row number where this path intersects column $n_1=t_{i_1}$. We define $r_2 = r_1'+1$ and $\ell_2 = n_1-1$ and consider the subgrid $G(r_2,\ell_2)$. Observe that in the undirected case it is possible that $P_{i_1}$ routes through the subgrid $G(r_2,\ell_2)$; see Figure \[fig:upperT\](b). In the directed case this cannot happen; see Figure \[fig:upperT\](a).
In addition, it is possible that $T_{i_2}$ completely avoids routing through the subgrid $G(r_2,\ell_2)$. But, for this to happen, it must have a cut-edge (containing all its flow) in column $t_{i_1}$; consequently, its total flow is then at most $\frac{1}{i_1}$. It is also possible that it has some flow which avoids $G(r_1,\ell_1)$ and some that does not. Since $T_{i_1}$ also has maximum flow at most $\frac{1}{i_1}$, it follows that in every case the total flow is at most $\frac{2}{i_1}$ plus the maximum size of a confluent flow in the subproblem $G(r_2,\ell_2)$. Note that in this subproblem, its “first” rooted subgraph may be at $t_{i_2}$ or $t_{i_3}$ depending on which of the two cases above occurred for $T_{i_2}$. If we iterate this process, at a general step $i$ we have a edge-confluent flow in the subgrid $G(r_i,\ell_i)$ whose lower-left corner is in row $r_i$ and column $\ell_i$ (hence $r_i \leq \ell_i$). Note that these triangular grids are in fact nested. Let $T_{n_i}$ be its subgraph rooted at a $t_{n_i}$ with $n_i$ maximized (that is, furthest to the left on bottom row). As before, the total flow in this sub-instance is at most $\frac{2}{n_i}$ plus a maximum edge-confluent flow in some $G(r_{i+1},\ell_{i+1})$. Since each new sub-instance has at least one less rooted flow, this process ends after at most $k^*\le k$ steps. Note that for $i < k^*$ we have $\frac{2}{n_i} \leq \frac{2}{\ell_{i+1}}$ and for $i=k^*$ we have $\frac{2}{n_{k^*}} \leq \frac{1}{r_{k^*}}$. The latter inequality follows since for each $i$ we have $r_i \leq n_i \leq \ell_i$.
Now by construction we have the grids are nested and so $\ell_1 > \ell_2 > \ldots \ell_{k^*} \geq r_{k^*} > \ldots r_2 > r_1$(recall that columns are ordered increasingly from right to left). Since $r_1=1$, we may inductively deduce that $r_{i} \geq i$ for all $i$. Thus $\ell_i \ge k^*$ for all $i$. The total flow in our instance is then at most $$\begin{aligned}
2\cdot \sum_{1 \leq i \leq k^*} \frac{1}{n_i} &\leq& 2\cdot (\sum_{2 \leq i \leq k^*} \frac{1}{\ell_i} + \frac{1}{r_{k^*}}) \\
&\le& 2\cdot \sum_{1 \leq i \leq k^*} \frac{1}{k^*} \\
&=& 2\end{aligned}$$ The lemma follows. [$\hfill{\Box}$]{}
We can now complete the proof of the approximation hardness. Observe that any node of degree four in $G_N$ is incident to two edges of weight $\frac{1}{i}$ and to two edges of weight $\frac{1}{j}$, for some $j < i$. Again, we construct a graph $\mathcal{G}$ by replacing each node of degree four with an instance $H$ of the $2$ node-disjoint paths problem, where the weight $\frac{1}{i}$ edges of $G_N$ are incident to $x_1$ and $y_1$, and the weight $\frac{1}{j}$ edges are incident to $x_2$ and $y_2$. In the undirected case we require capacitated node-disjoint paths and set $\alpha=\frac{1}{i}$ and $\beta=\frac{1}{j}$. More precisely, since we are dealing with node capacities in confluent flows, we actually subdivide each edge of $H$ and the new node inherits the edge’s capacity. The nodes $x_1$ and $y_1$ also have capacity $\frac{1}{i}$ whilst the nodes $x_2$ and $y_2$ have capacity $\frac{1}{j}$ in order to simulate the edge capacities of $G_N$.
\[lem:yes2\] If $H$ is a YES-instance, then the maximum single-sink confluent flow in $\mathcal{G}$ has value $H_N$. If $H$ is a NO-instance, then the maximum confluent flow in $\mathcal{G}$ has value at most $2$.
[**Proof.**]{} It is clear that if $H$ is a YES-instance, then the two feasible paths in $H$ can be used to allow paths in $G_N$ to cross at any node without restrictions on their values. This means we obtain a confluent flow of value $H_N$ by using the canonical paths $P^*_i, \, 1 \le i \le N$.
Now suppose that $H$ is a NO-instance and consider how a confluent flow $\mathcal{T}=\{T_1,\dots, T_n\}$ routes packets through the gadgets. As it is a NO-instance, the image of the trees (after contracting the $H$’s to single nodes) in $G_N$ yields a non-crossing edge-confluent flow. The capacity of this collection in $G_N$ is at least that in $\mathcal{G}$. By Lemma \[lemma.maxflow\], their capacity is at most $2$, completing the proof. [$\hfill{\Box}$]{}
\
[[**Theorem \[thm:hardnba\].**]{} *Given the no-bottleneck assumption, the single-sink confluent flow problem cannot be approximated to within a factor $O(\log^{1-\epsilon}n)$, for any $\epsilon > 0$, unless $P=NP$. This holds for both the maximum cardinality and maximum throughput objectives in undirected and directed graphs.\
*]{}
[**Proof.**]{} It follows that if we could approximate the maximum confluent flow problem in $\mathcal{G}$ to a factor better than $H_N/2$, we could determine whether the optimal solution is $2$ or $H_N$. This in turn would allow us to determine whether $H$ is a YES- or a NO-instance.
Note that $\mathcal{G}$ has $n=\Theta(pN^2)$ edges, where $p=|V(H)|$. If we take $N = \Theta(p^{\frac12(\frac{1}{\epsilon}-1)})$, where $\epsilon>0$ is a small constant, then $H_N=\Theta(\frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{\epsilon}-1) \log p)$. For $p$ sufficiently large, this is $\Omega((\log n)^{1-\epsilon}) = (\frac{1}{\epsilon} \log p )^{1-\epsilon}$. This gives a lower bound of $\Omega((\log n)^{1-\epsilon})$. [$\hfill{\Box}$]{}
Similarly, if we are restricted to consider only flows that decompose into $k$ disjoint trees then it is not hard to see that:
Given the no-bottleneck assumption, there is a $\Omega(\log k)$ hardness of approximation, unless $P=NP$, for the problem of finding a maximum confluent flow that decomposes into at most $k$ disjoint trees. [$\hfill{\Box}$]{}
Stronger Lower Bounds for Cardinality Single-Sink Unsplittable Flow with Arbitrary Demands {#sec:stronger}
==========================================================================================
In the large demand regime even stronger lower bounds can be achieved for the cardinality objective. To see this, we explain the technique of Azar and Regev [@azar2001strongly] (used to prove Theorem \[thm:ar\]) in Section \[sec:expo-demands\] and show how to extend it to undirected graphs and to confluent flows. Then in Section \[sec:refine\], we combine their construction with the half-grid graph to obtain lower bounds in terms of the bottleneck value (Theorem \[thm:harder\]).
$m^{1-\epsilon}$ Hardness in the Large-Demand Regime {#sec:expo-demands}
----------------------------------------------------
[[**Theorem \[thm:extended\].**]{} *If $P \neq NP$ then, for any $\epsilon > 0$, there is no $O(m^{1-\epsilon})$-approximation algorithm for the cardinality objective of the single-sink unsplittable/confluent flow problem in undirected graphs.\
*]{}
[**Proof.**]{} We begin by describing the construction of Azar and Regev for directed graphs. They embed instances of the uncapacitated $2$-disjoint paths problem into a directed path. Formally, we start with a directed path $z^1,z^2, \ldots ,z^{\ell}$ where $t=z^{\ell}$ forms our sink destination for all demands. In addition, for each $i < \ell$, there are two parallel edges from $z^{i-1}$ to $z^{i}$. One of these has capacity $2^{i}$ and the other has a smaller capacity of $2^{i}-1$. There is a demand $s_i$ from each $z^i$, $i < \ell$ to $z^{\ell}$ of size $2^{i+1}$. Note that this unsplittable flow instance is feasible as follows. For each demand $s_j$, we may follow the high capacity edge from $z^j$ to $z^{j+1}$ (using up all of its capacity) and then use low capacity edges on the path $z^{j+1},z^{j+2}, \ldots ,z^{\ell}$. Call these the [*canonical paths*]{} for the demands. The total demand on the low capacity edge from $z^j$ is then $\sum_{i \leq j} 2^i =2^{j+1}-1$, as desired.
Now replace each node $z^j$, $1\le j < \ell$, by an instance $H^j$ of the uncapacitated directed $2$-disjoint paths problem. Each edge in $H^j$ is given capacity $2^{j+1}$. Furthermore:\
(i) The tail of the high capacity edge out of $z^j$ is identified with the node $y_2$.\
(ii) The tail of the low capacity edge out of $z^j$ is identified with $y_1$.\
(iii) The heads of both edges into $z^j$ (if they exist) are identified with $x_1$.\
(iv) The node $x_2$ becomes the starting point of the demand $s_j$ from $z^j$.\
This construction is shown in Figure \[fig:line\].
![\[fig:line\] An Azar-Regev Path](line.pdf "fig:"){width="16cm" height="11cm"}\
Now if we have a YES-instance of the $2$-disjoint paths problem, we may then simulate the canonical paths in the standard way. The demand in $H^j$ uses the directed path from $x_2$ to $y_2$ in $H^j$; it then follows the high capacity edge from $y_2$ to the $x_1$-node in the next instance $H^{j+1}$. All the total demand arriving from upstream $H^i$’s entered $H^{j}$ at its node $x_1$ and follows the directed path from $x_1$ to $y_1$. This total demand is at most $\sum_{i \leq j} 2^i$ and thus fits into the low capacity edge from $H^j$ into $H^{j+1}$. Observe that this routing is also confluent in our modified instance because the paths in the $H^j$’s are node-disjoint. Hence, if we have a YES-instance of the $2$-disjoint paths problem, both the unsplittable and confluent flow problems have a solution routing all of the demands.
Now suppose that we have a NO-instance, and consider a solution to the unsplittable (or confluent) flow problem. Take the highest value $i$ such that the demand from $H^i$ is routed. By construction, this demand must use a path $P_2$ from $x_2$ to $y_2$. But this saturates the high capacity edge from $y_2$. Hence any demand from $H^j$, $j < i$ must pass from $y_1$ to $x_1$ while avoiding the edges of $P_2$. This is impossible, and so we route at most one demand.
This gives a gap of $\ell$ for the cardinality objective. Azar-Regev then choose $\ell = |V(H)|^{\lceil \frac{1}{\epsilon} \rceil}$ to obtain a hardness of $\Omega(n^{1-\epsilon'})$.
Now consider undirected graphs. Here we use an undirected instance of the capacitated $2$-disjoint paths problem. We plug this instance into each $H^j$, and use the two capacity values of $\b=2^{j+1}$ and $\a=2^{j+1}-1$. A similar routing argument then gives the lower bound. [$\hfill{\Box}$]{} We remark that it is easy to see why this approach does not succeed for the throughput objective. The use of exponentially growing demands implies that high throughput is achieved simply by routing the largest demand.
Lower Bounds for Arbitrary Demands {#sec:refine}
----------------------------------
By combining paths and half-grids we are able to refine the lower bounds in terms of the bottleneck value (or demand spread).\
[[**Theorem \[thm:harder\].**]{} *Consider any fixed $\epsilon > 0$ and $d_{max}/u_{min} > 1$. It is NP-hard to approximate cardinality single-sink unsplittable/confluent flow to within a factor of $O(\sqrt{\log (\frac{d_{max}}{u_{min}})}\cdot m^{\frac12-\epsilon})$ in undirected or directed graphs. For unsplittable flow, this remains true for planar graphs.\
*]{}
[**Proof.**]{} We start with two parameters $p$ and $q$. We create $p$ copies of the Azar-Regev path and attach them to a $p\times p$ half-grid, as shown in Figure \[fig:gridline\].
![\[fig:gridline\]](gridline.pdf "fig:"){width="16cm" height="11cm"}\
Now take the $i^{th}$ Azar-Regev path, for each $i=1,2 \ldots p$. The path contains $q$ supply nodes with demands of sizes $2^{(i-1)q},2^{(i-1)q+1},\ldots , 2^{iq-1}$. (Supply node $s_j$ has demand $2^{j-1}$.) Therefore the total demand on path $i$ is $\tau_i := 2^{(i-1)q}(2^q-1)<2^{iq}$. The key point is that [*the total demand of path $i$ is less than the smallest demand in path $i+1$*]{}. Note that we have $pq$ demands, and thus demand sizes from $2^{0}$ up to $2^{pq-1}$. Consequently the demand spread is $2^{pq-1}$. We set $u_{\min}=d_{\min}$ and thus $$pq-1 = \log\left(\frac{d_{max}}{d_{min}}\right) = \log\left(\frac{d_{max}}{u_{min}}\right)$$
It remains to prescribe capacities to the edges of the half-grid. To do this every edge in $i$th canonical hooked path has capacity $\tau_i$ (not ${c_{i}}$). These capacity assignments, in turn, induce corresponding capacities in each of the disjoint paths gadgets. It follows that if the each gadget on the paths and half-grid correspond to a YES-instance gadget then we may route all $pq$ demands.
Now suppose the gadgets correspond to a NO-instance. It follows that we may route at most one demand along each Azar-Regev path. But, by our choice of demand values, any demand on the $i$th path is too large to fit into any column $j < i$ in the half-grid. Hence we have the same conditions required in Theorem \[thm:hard\] to show that at most one demand in total can feasibly route. It follows that we cannot approximate the cardinality objective to better than a factor $pq$.
Note that the construction contains at most $m=O((qp+ p^2)\cdot |E(H)|)$ edges, where $H$ is the size of the $2$-disjoint paths instance. Now we select $p$ and $q$ such that $q\ge p$ and $pq\ge |E(H)|^{\frac{1}{\epsilon}}$. Then, for some constant $C$, we have $$\begin{aligned}
C\cdot m^{.\frac12-\epsilon}\cdot \sqrt{\log(\frac{d_{max}}{d_{min}})} &=& m^{\frac12-\epsilon} \cdot \sqrt{\log(\frac{d_{max}}{d_{min}})} \\
&\le & \sqrt{pq}\cdot \sqrt{pq}\\
&=& pq\end{aligned}$$ Therefore, since we cannot approximate to within $pq$, we cannot approximate the cardinality objective to better than a factor $O(\sqrt{\log (\frac{d_{max}}{u_{min}})}\cdot m^{\frac12-\epsilon})$. [$\hfill{\Box}$]{}
Upper Bounds for Flows with Arbitrary Demands {#sec:upper}
=============================================
In this section we present upper bounds for maximum flow problems with arbitrary demands.
Unsplittable Flow with Arbitrary Demands {#sec:upper-unsplittable}
----------------------------------------
One natural approach for the cardinality unsplittable flow problem is used repeatedly in the literature (even for general multiflows). Group the demands into at most $O(\log \frac{d_{max}}{d_{min}}) \geq \log (\frac{d_{max}}{u_{min}})$ bins, and then consider each bin separately. This approach can also be applied to the throughput objective (and to the more general profit-maximisation model). This immediately incurs a lost factor relating to the number of bins, and this feels slightly artificial. In fact, given the no-bottleneck assumption regime, there is no need to lose this extra factor: Baveja et al [@baveja2000approximation] gave an $O(\sqrt{m})$ approximation for profit-maximisation when $d_{max} \leq u_{min}$. On the other hand, our lower bound in Theorem \[thm:harder\] shows that if $d_{max} > u_{min}$ we do need to lose some factor dependent on $d_{max}$. But how large does this need to be? The current best upper bound is $O(\log (\frac{d_{max}}{u_{min}})\cdot \sqrt{m \log m})$ by Guruswami et al. [@guruswami2003near], and this works for the general profit-maximisation model.[^4] For the cardinality and throughput objectives, however, we can obtain a better upper bound. The proof combines analyses from [@baveja2000approximation] and [@kolliopoulos2004approximating] (which focus on the no-bottleneck assumption case). We emphasize that the following theorem applies to all multiflow problems not just the single-sink case.\
[[**Theorem \[thm:upper\].**]{} *There is an $O(\sqrt{m}\log (\frac{d_{max}}{u_{min}}))$ approximation algorithm for cardinality unsplittable flow and an $O(\sqrt{m}\log n)$ approximation algorithm for throughput unsplittable flow, in both directed and undirected graphs.\
*]{}
[**Proof.**]{} We apply a result from [@guruswami2003near] which shows that for cardinality unsplittable flow, with $d_{max} \leq \Delta d_{min}$, the greedy algorithm yields a $O(\Delta \sqrt{m})$ approximation. Their proof is a technical extension of the greedy analysis of Kolliopoulos and Stein [@kolliopoulos2004approximating]. We first find an approximation for the sub-instance consisting of the demands at most $u_{min}$. This satisfies the no-bottleneck assumption and an $O(\sqrt{m})$-approximation is known for general profits [@baveja2000approximation]. Now, either this sub-instance gives half the optimal profits, or we focus on demands of at least $u_{min}$. In the remaining demands, by losing a $\log (\frac{d_{max}}{u_{min}})$ factor, we may assume $d_{max} \leq \Delta d_{min}$, for some $\Delta=O(1)$. The greedy algorithm above then gives the desired guarantee for the cardinality problem. The same approach applies for the throughput objective, since all demands within the same bin have values within a constant factor of each other. Moreover, we require only $\log n$ bins as demands of at most $\frac{d_{max}}{n}$ may be discarded as they are not necessary for obtaining high throughput. [$\hfill{\Box}$]{}
As alluded to earlier, this upper bound is not completely satisfactory as pointed out in [@chekuri2003edge]. Namely, all of the lower bound instances have a linear number of edges $m=O(n)$. Therefore, it is possible that there exist upper bounds dependent on $\sqrt{n}$. Indeed, for the special case of [[MEDP]{}]{} in undirected graphs and directed acyclic graphs $O(\sqrt{n})$-approximations have been developed [@chekuri2006n; @nguyen2007disjoint]. Such an upper bound is not known for general directed [[MEDP]{}]{} however; the current best approximation is $\min\{\sqrt{m},n^{2/3}\}$.
Priority Flow with Arbitrary Demands {#sec:upper-priority}
------------------------------------
Next we show that the lower bound for the maximum priority flow problem is tight.
Consider an instance of the maximum priority flow problem with $k$ priority classes. There is a polytime algorithm that approximates the maximum flow to within a factor of $O(\min\{k,\sqrt{m}\})$.
First suppose that $k \leq \sqrt{m}$. Then for each class $i$, we may find the optimal priority flow by solving a maximum flow problem in the subgraph induced by all edges of priority $i$ or better. This yields a $k$-approximation. Next consider the case where $\sqrt{m} < k$. Then we may apply Lemma \[lem:greedy-priority\], below, which implies that the greedy algorithm yields a $O(\sqrt{m})$-approximation. The theorem follows. [$\hfill{\Box}$]{}
The following proof for uncapacitated networks follows ideas from the greedy analysis of Kleinberg [@Kleinberg96], and Kolliopoulos and Stein [@kolliopoulos2004approximating]. One may also design an $O(\sqrt{m})$-approximation for general edge capacities using more intricate ideas from [@guruswami2003near]; we omit the details.
\[lem:greedy-priority\] A greedy algorithm yields a $O(\sqrt{m})$-approximation to the maximum priority flow problem.
We now run the greedy algorithm as follows. On each iteration, we find the demand $s_i$ which has a shortest feasible path in the residual graph. Let $P_i$ be the associated path, and delete its edges. Let the greedy solution have cardinality $t$. Let $\mathcal{O}$ be the optimal maximum priority flow and let ${\cal Q}$ be those demands which are satisfied in some optimal solution but not by the greedy algorithm. We aim to upper bound the size of $\mathcal{Q}$.
Let $Q$ be a path used in the optimal solution satisfying some demand in ${\cal Q}$. Consider any edge $e$ and the greedy path using it. We say that $P_i$ [*blocks*]{} an optimal path $Q$ if $i$ is the least index such that $P_i$ and $Q$ share a common edge $e$. Clearly such an $i$ exists or else we could still route on $Q$.
Let $l_i$ denote the length of $P_i$. Let $k_i$ denote the number of optimal paths (corresponding to demands in ${\cal Q}$ ) that are blocked by $P_i$. It follows that $k_i \le l_i$. But, by the definition of the greedy algorithm, we have that each such blocked path must have length at least $l_i$ at the time when $P_i$ was packed. Hence it used up at least $l_i \ge k_i$ units of capacity in the optimal solution. Therefore the total capacity used by the unsatisfied demands from the optimal solution is at least $\sum_{i=1}^t k_i^2$. As the total capacity is at most $m$ we obtain
$$\label{bounding}
\frac{(\sum_{i=1}^t k_i)^2}{t} \leq
\sum_{i=1}^t k_i^2 \leq m$$
where the first inequality is by the Chebyshev Sum Inequality. Since $\sum_{i} k_i = |{\cal Q}| = |{\cal O}| -t $, we obtain $\frac{(|\mathcal{O}|-t)^2}{t} \leq m$. One may verify that if $t < \frac{|\mathcal{O}|}{\sqrt{m}}$ then this inequality implies $|\mathcal{O}| = O(\sqrt{m})$ and, so, routing a single demand yields the desired approximation. [$\hfill{\Box}$]{}
Conclusion
==========
It would be interesting to improve the upper bound in Theorem \[thm:upper\] to be in terms of $\sqrt{n}$ rather than $\sqrt{m}$. Resolving the discrepancy with Theorem \[thm:harder\] between $\sqrt{\log(\frac{d_{max}}{u_{min}})}$ and $\log(\frac{d_{max}}{u_{min}})$ would also clarify the complete picture.
\
[**Acknowledgments.**]{} The authors thank Guyslain Naves for his careful reading and precise and helpful comments. The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the NSERC Discovery Grant Program.
[^1]: An exception concerns the analysis of graphs with constant treewidth [@dressler2010capacitated].
[^2]: In [@guruswami2003near], they do however establish an inapproximability bound of $n^{1/2-\epsilon}$, for any $\epsilon > 0$, on [*node-capacitated*]{} [USF]{} in undirected graphs.
[^3]: This seems likely connected to a footnote in [@azar2001strongly] that a lower bound of the form $O(m^{\frac12-\epsilon}\cdot \sqrt{\log (\frac{d_{max}}{u_{min}}}))$ exists for maximum unsplittable flow in directed graphs. Its proof was omitted however.
[^4]: Actually, they state the bound as $\log^{3/2}m$ because exponential size demands are not considered in that paper.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'The number of academic papers being published is increasing exponentially in recent years, and recommending adequate citations to assist researchers in writing papers is a non-trivial task. Conventional approaches may not be optimal, as the recommended papers may already be known to the users, or be solely relevant to the surrounding context but not other ideas discussed in the manuscript. In this work, we propose a novel embedding algorithm DocCit2Vec, along with the new concept of “structural context”, to tackle the aforementioned issues. The proposed approach demonstrates superior performances to baseline models in extensive experiments designed to simulate practical usage scenarios.'
author:
-
-
bibliography:
- 'citations\_new.bib'
title: 'Citation Recommendations Considering Content and Structural Context Embedding [^1]'
---
Citation Recommendation, Document Embedding, Information Retrieval, Hyper-document, Link Prediction
Introduction {#intro}
============
When writing a paper, one of the common questions arising in many researchers’ minds is that of which paper to cite for a certain context. However, with the exponentially increasing number of published papers, finding suitable citations is a considerable challenge.
Researchers generally rely on keyword-based recommenders, such as Google Scholar [^2] and Mendeley [^3]. However, using keyword-based systems often results in unsatisfying results, as the query words may not carry adequate information to reflect the need to find relevant papers [@Jia:2017:ACR:3110025.3110150; @10.1007/978-3-319-76941-7_73]. Therefore, many approaches have been proposed to tackle this issue from various perspectives. For example, [@Caragea:2013:CSF:2467696.2467743; @4061472; @Jia:2017:ACR:3110025.3110150; @Kucuktunc:2013:TPS:2492517.2492605; @McNee:2002:RCR:587078.587096] attempt to recommend papers based on input seed papers. Some studies have considered personalized inputs, such as meta-data (title, abstract, keyword list, and publication year) [@Alzogbi2015PubRecRP; @Li2018ConferencePR]. In addition, the studies [@P18-1222; @He:2011:CRW:1935826.1935926; @He:2010:CCR:1772690.1772734] proposed making recommendations based on the “local context” (the context surrounding a citation). Context-based recommendations are considered to be practical for aiding the paper-writing process. However, due to the limitation of only utilizing the local context, these approaches may not be effective in some scenarios. For example, when a writer has finished writing a section of the manuscript, how can citations be effectively recommended to flesh out the content? Suppose that an author is writing a manuscript as in the example shown in Figure \[fig0\]. Some parts of the manuscript are finished, and suitable citations have been inserted (content in the blue box). However, some parts have just been written, where citations have not yet been inserted (content in the red box). The objective of this work is to design a model to find relevant papers for freshly written content in a manuscript.
![Citation recommendations for fleshing out content.[]{data-label="fig0"}](figure0.png){width="\columnwidth"}
Conventional context-based approaches may not be optimal, for three reasons:
1. Previously cited papers are considered to be “redundant” for fleshing out the content. Users are already aware of these papers, and therefore they will cite them to flesh out the content without recommendation if they are relevant.
2. Previously cited papers contain information on co-citations, which may lead to more effective recommendations. For example, if the papers A, B, C, and D are frequently cited together, then it is likely that a paper will cite D if it has already cited A, B, and C.
3. An effective citation recommendation may not only be relevant to the idea discussed in the local context, but could also be linked to ideas that have been discussed in previous contexts.
To provide a solution to the above-mentioned issues, we introduce the “structural context” in addition to the contexts containing word information (local contexts), which represents all the existing citations in the manuscript. This is motivated by the following considerations:
1. The structural context carries information on all the existing citations, and can thus avoid recommending citations already known to the user.
2. It can effectively recommend co-cited papers.
3. Existing citations are relevant to various ideas in the fleshed out content.
Considering these facts, we propose DocCit2Vec as an improved citation recommendation approach. This is a novel embedding algorithm, designed to embed academic papers as dense vectors by preserving information on the content, local context, and structural context.
The major contributions of this paper are summarized as follows:
1. The new concept of “structural context” is introduced to improve citation recommendations in practical scenarios (Section \[sec:pre\]).
2. We propose the novel embedding model DocCit2Vec, and implement this with two neural network designs to explore the ability of an attention mechanism in citation recommendation tasks compared with a conventional average hidden layer (Section \[sec:model\]).
3. The models are validated through extensive experiments, including three citation recommendation tasks and two classification tasks (Section \[sec:exp\]).
The remainder of this paper is structured as follows. Section \[sec:re\] summarizes related studies. Section \[sec:pre\] provides notations, definitions, and the problem statement. Then, the embedding models and mathematical expressions are described in Section \[sec:model\], and the experiments and results are explained in Section \[sec:exp\]. Finally, Section \[sec:sum\] concludes the paper.
Related Work {#sec:re}
============
Document Embedding {#sec:emd}
------------------
Document embedding studies the representation of documents as continuous vectors. The Word2Vec model [@41224; @Mikolov:2013:DRW:2999792.2999959] proposed a simple neural network to learn representation vectors for words in a given context. Doc2Vec [@pmlr-v32-le14] further expanded this model to embed documents. However, these two models suffer from information loss concerning links when embedding linked documents. HyperDoc2Vec [@P18-1222] was developed to incorporate the link information into dense vectors. Nevertheless, when applied to our scenario these techniques may still suffer from information loss, as they do not explicitly model the structural context.
Citation Recommendation {#sec:cit}
-----------------------
Citation recommendation is the research field of finding the most relevant papers based on an input query. The studies [@Caragea:2013:CSF:2467696.2467743; @4061472; @Jia:2017:ACR:3110025.3110150; @Kucuktunc:2013:TPS:2492517.2492605; @McNee:2002:RCR:587078.587096] proposed utilizing a list of seed papers as a query, and providing recommendations through techniques such as collaborative filtering [@Caragea:2013:CSF:2467696.2467743; @McNee:2002:RCR:587078.587096] and PageRank-based methods [@4061472; @Jia:2017:ACR:3110025.3110150; @Kucuktunc:2013:TPS:2492517.2492605]. Some studies have considered personalized queries, such as meta-data (title, abstract, keyword list, and publication year) [@Alzogbi2015PubRecRP; @Li2018ConferencePR]. These methods would be effective in helping early-phase researches, such as by generating research ideas. However, for manuscript-writing tasks they may offer minimal help. Context-based recommendations [@P18-1222; @He:2011:CRW:1935826.1935926; @He:2010:CCR:1772690.1772734] take the context of a passage from a manuscript as a query, to provide recommendations aiming to assist the paper-writing process. However, these methods suffer from information loss, as information on citations already known to the user and other ideas in the paper are not taken into consideration.
Attention Mechanism {#sec:att}
-------------------
The attention mechanism is commonly applied in vision-related tasks [@NIPS2014_5345], where it can detect certain parts of an image to perform accurate predictions through learning. The authors of [@ling-etal-2015-contexts] extended the Word2Vec model using an attention mechanism to enhance the performance in classification tasks. In this work, we continue to explore the ability of the attention mechanism when applied in an embedding algorithm to enhance the performance for citation recommendation and classification tasks.
Preliminaries {#sec:pre}
=============
Notations and Definitions {#sec:def}
-------------------------
We adapt the same notations to define hyper-documents as [@P18-1222]. Let $\mathit{w} \in \mathit{W}$ representing a word from a vocabulary $\mathit{W}$, and $\mathit{d}\in\mathit{D}$ representing a document id (the paper DOIs) from an id collection $\mathit{D}$. The textual information of a paper $\mathit{H}$ is represented as a sequence of words and document ids, *i.e.*, $\mathit{\hat{W}} \cup \mathit{\hat{D}}$ where $\mathit{\hat{W}} \subseteq \mathit{W}$ and $ {\hat{D}} \subseteq \mathit{D}$.
Each citation relation (exemplified in Fig. \[fig:citrelation\]) in a paper $\mathit{H}$ is expressed by a tuple $\langle \mathit{d_s}, \mathit{d_t}, \mathit{D_n}, \mathit{C}\rangle$, where $\mathit{d_s} \in \mathit{\hat{D}}$ is the id of the citing paper, the target id $d_t \in \mathit{\hat{D}}$ represents the cited paper, and $\mathit{C} \subseteq \mathit{\hat{W}}$ is the local context around $\mathit{d_t}$. If other citations exist in the manuscript, then these are defined as the *“structural context”*, denoted by $\mathit{D_n}$ where $\{\mathit{d_n} | \mathit{d_n} \in \mathit{\hat{D}}, \mathit{d_n} \neq \mathit{d_t}, \mathit{d_n} \neq \mathit{d_s}\}$.
{width="\textwidth"}
Embedding matrices are denoted as $\mathbf{D} \in \mathbb{R}^{k \times |D|}$ for documents and $\mathbf{W} \in \mathbb{R}^{k \times |W|}$ for words. The *i*-th column of $\mathbf{D}$, $\mathbf{d_i}$, is a $\mathit{k}$-dimensional vector representing the document $\mathit{d_i}$, and the *j*-th column of $\mathbf{W}$ is the *k*-dimensional vector for the word $\mathit{w_j}$.
Problem Statement
-----------------
There are two objectives for this task: First, embedding the papers as dense vectors, and second finding the most similar papers based on the embedded vector of an input paper. The two problems are stated as follows.
### Hyper-document Embedding
Inspired by [@P18-1222], we adopt two-step learning procedures to embed academic papers. The first step aims to embed the document and related contents, and the second embeds the local and structural contexts based on the learned vectors from the first step.
In the first step, the paper $\mathit{X}$ is simply treated as a plain text containing an id $\mathit{d_i}$ and words $\{w| w\in \mathit{\hat{W}} \}$. The objective is to learn to represent $\mathit{d_i}$ as a *k*-dimensional vector $\mathbf{d_i}$, and all the words as a matrix $\mathbf{\hat{W}}$, where each vector $\mathbf{w_i}$ is the representation for a word $\mathit{w_i} \in \mathit{\hat{W}}$.
For the second step, a citation $\langle \mathit{d_s}, \mathit{d_t}, \mathit{D_n}, \mathit{C}\rangle$ from the paper $\mathit{X}$ and the previously learned matrices $\mathbf{\hat{W}}$ and $\mathbf{d_i}$ are given. Then, each document id in the set $\mathit{d_i} \in \mathit{d_s} \cup \mathit{d_t} \cup \mathit{D_n}$ is learned, and these are represented by the matrix $\mathbf{\hat{D_c}}$, where each column is the *k*-dimensional vector for the corresponding doc id. Furthermore, $\mathbf{\hat{W_c} \subseteq \mathbf{\hat{W}}}$ represents the embedding matrix for the context words $\mathit{C}$, where each column is a vector representing $\mathit{w} \in \mathit{C}$.
### Citation Recommendation {#cases}
We set three usage cases to simulate the proposed scenario. For each case, the purpose is to find the most similar papers based on vector similarities.
- Case 1: In this case, it is assumed that the author has inserted a number of citations in the completed content of the manuscript. To find the most similar paper, we take the local context of the content without citations and the structural context (previously existing citations) as input vectors, and rank document vectors by similarity.
- Case 2: This case assumes that some of the existing citations are invalid, because they might not be available in the dataset or the author has made typos. When recommending, the local context and randomly selected structural contexts are adopted for the similarity computation.
- Case 3: If all the existing citations are invalid or the author has not inserted any citations, then only the local context is adopted for the similarity computation.
DocCit2Vec {#sec:model}
==========
Representing Documents and Citations
------------------------------------
The embedding of documents refers to the process of assigning vectors to each document id and word, and optimizing these with predictions of target words or document ids. For example, *pv-dm* [@pmlr-v32-le14] learns two vectors (IN and OUT vectors) for each word, *i.e.*, $\mathbf{w^I}$ and $\mathbf{w^O}$, respectively, and one OUT vector $\mathbf{d^I}$ for each document id. Given a document id and its content, the model picks a word as the target, and averages over the IN vectors of the document id $\mathbf{d^I}$ and all the words in the surrounding context $\{\mathbf{w^I_i} | i \in \mathit{C}\}$ to make a prediction of the target word’s OUT vector $\mathbf{w^O}$. Representing documents as predictions of target words enables the document vector to reflect the words the document contains, *i.e.*, the content.
DocCit2Vec conceptualizes the learning process as the prediction of a target citation, so that an embedded document vector carries the information of a target citation. This process is illustrated in Fig.\[model\]. Given a citation relation, DocCit2Vec picks one publication from the citation list as the target, and utilizes the surrounding context and structural context as known knowledge to maximize the occurrence of the target citation by updating the parameters (*i.e., the embedding vectors*) of the neural network. The model learns two document embedding vectors IN and OUT, where the IN vector $\mathbf{d^I}$ characterizes the document as a citing paper and the OUT vector $\mathbf{d^O}$ encodes its role as a cited paper [@P18-1222]. In addition, the model learns IN word vectors $\mathbf{w^I}$.
As mentioned in Section 3.2, embedding academic papers involves two steps: embedding of the content and of the citations. For the first step, we adopt the retrofitting technique as in [@P18-1222], which initializes a predefined number of iterations based on the *pv-dm* model and then utilizes the learned vectors as the “base” vectors for step two.
Two designs of DocCit2Vec are proposed, the first design (DocCit2Vec-avg) uses an conventional averaged hidden layer, and the second (DocCit2Vec-att) adopts an attention hidden layer.
DocCit2Vec with an Average Hidden Layer
---------------------------------------
The architecture of DocCit2Vec-avg is constructed based on the *pv-dm* structure of Doc2Vec [@pmlr-v32-le14] and HyperDoc2Vec [@P18-1222], shown on the right side of Fig. \[model\]. The model initializes an IN document matrix $\mathbf{D^{I}}$ at the input layer, an OUT document matrix $\mathbf{D^{O}}$ at the output layer, and an IN word matrix $\mathbf{W^{I}}$ at the input layer. To obtain a citation relation $\langle \mathit{d_{x}},\mathit{d_t}, \{\mathit{d_i}|i\in \mathit{D_n}\}, \{w|w\in \mathit{C}\}\rangle$, the model averages over the corresponding IN vectors of $\mathit{d_{x}}$, $\{\mathit{d_i}|i\in \mathit{D_n}\}$, and $\{w|w\in \mathit{C}\}$. The output layer is computed using a multi-class softmax classifier, and the output value is regarded as the probability of the occurrence of $\mathit{d_t}$.
{width="\textwidth"}
To learn all the citation relations $\mathcal{C}$, the model is statistically expressed as $$\max_{\mathbf{D^{I}}, \mathbf{D^{O}}, \mathbf{W^{I}}}
\frac{1}{|\mathcal{C}|} \sum_{\langle \mathit{d_s},\mathit{d_t}, \mathit{D_n}, \mathit{C}\rangle \in \mathcal{C}}
\log P(\mathit{d_t|\mathit{d_s}, \mathit{D_n}, \mathit{C}})$$
The hidden layer of the neural network is expressed as $$\mathbf{x} = \frac{1}{1 + |\mathit{D_n}| + |\mathcal{C}|}
\Big(\mathbf{d_s}^{I} + \sum_{\mathit{d_n} \in \mathit{D_n}}\mathbf{d_n}^{I} + \sum_{\mathit{w} \in \mathit{C}} \mathbf{w}^{I}\Big)$$
The output layer adopts a multi-class softmax function, which is represented as $$P(\mathit{d_t}|\mathit{d_s}, \mathit{D_n}, \mathit{C}) =
\frac{\exp \big(\mathbf{x}^T \mathbf{d}^O_t \big)}{\sum_{\mathit{d}\in\mathit{D}} \exp \big(\mathbf{x}^T\mathbf{d}^O \big)}$$
The negative sampling technique [@Mikolov:2013:DRW:2999792.2999959] is adopted to optimize the efficiency of the training procedure: $$\log \sigma \big( \mathbf{x}^T\mathbf{d}^O_t \big) +
\sum^n_{i=1} \mathcal{E}_{\mathit{d_i} ~ P_{N(d)}} \log \sigma \big(-\mathbf{x}^T\mathbf{d}^O_i \big)$$
To optimize the model, the gradients of the loss function with respect to the parameters $\mathbf{D}^I$, $\mathbf{D}^O$, and $\mathbf{W}^I$ are computed. The parameters are then updated with an input learning rate through backpropagation.
DocCit2Vec with an Attention Hidden Layer
-----------------------------------------
The architecture of DocCit2Vec-att is the same as that of DocCit2Vec-avg on the right side of Fig. \[model\], except that the averaged hidden layer is replaced by an attention layer, inspired by [@ling-etal-2015-contexts]. In addition to the original parameters, the weight vector $\mathbf{K} \in \mathbb{R}^{1 \times (|D|+|W|)}$ is introduced at the attention layer, where each value denotes the importance of a word or document. The model is statistically expressed as
$$\max_{\mathbf{D^{I}}, \mathbf{D^{O}}, \mathbf{W^{I}}, \mathbf{K}}
\frac{1}{|\mathcal{C}|} \sum_{\langle \mathit{d_s},\mathit{d_t}, \mathit{D_n}, \mathit{C}\rangle \in \mathcal{C}}
\log P(\mathit{d_t|\mathit{d_s}, \mathit{D_n}, \mathit{C}})$$
Instead of the averaged hidden layer, the attention layer computes a weighted sum of an individual word and document through the multiplication of the vector and its weight ratio, which is expressed as follows: $$\mathbf{x} =
\mathbf{d_s}^{I} \cdot \mathit{a_{d_s}}+ \sum_{\mathit{d_n} \in \mathit{D_n}}\mathbf{d_n}^{I} \cdot \mathit{a_{d_n}} + \sum_{\mathit{w} \in \mathit{C}} \mathbf{w}^{I} \cdot \mathit{a_{w}}$$
The terms $\mathit{a_{d_s}}$, $\mathit{a_{d_n}}$, and $\mathit{a_{w}}$ are associated weight ratios for the documents $\mathit{d_s}$ and $\mathit{d_n}$ and the word $\mathit{w}$. The weight ratios are computed by using the matrix $\mathbf{K}$ as follows:
$$\mathit{a_i} = \frac{\exp k_i}{\sum_{j \in (\mathit{d_s} \cup \mathit{D_n} \cup \mathit{C})} \exp k_j}$$
For output layer, negative sampling is performed in an identical manner to DocCit2Vec. In addition, the gradient of $\mathbf{K}$ is computed to optimize DocCit2Vec using attention.
Experiments {#sec:exp}
===========
Datasets and Experimental Settings
----------------------------------
Two pre-processed datasets DBLP and ACL Anthology [@P18-1222], containing full texts of academic papers in the computer science domain are utilized. Statistical summaries of the datasets are provided in Table \[tab:data\].
**Dataset** **Experiments**
------------- -- -------- ----------------- -- -------- ----------- --
Train: 14,654 Train: 79,932
Test: 1,563 Test: 28,797
Train: 630,909 Train: 2,770,712
Test: 18,205 Test: 103,591
We conduct two experiments on the large-sized DBLP dataset: citation recommendations and topic classification. For the citation recommendations, we picked all the documents with more than one citation from the same dataset published in recent years as the test dataset, and the remainder of the dataset was utilized to train the embedding model. Another medium-sized dataset, the ACL Anthology, was also adopted to implement the citation recommendation experiment. This contains a similar number of average citations per document as DBLP. Same to DBLP, we selected a test dataset for testing the recommendation performance, and a training dataset for to train the model.The titles and included citations of the texts are replaced by indices, so that the algorithm can detect these as hyperlinks. For example, a citation \[1\] or (Song et al. 2018) is replaced with an index, and the title of the cited paper is replaced by the same index. Following the same settings as in [@P18-1222], we set 50 words before and after a citation as the citation context.
We implemented three baseline models: Word2Vec, Doc2Vec, and HyperDoc2Vec. The Gensim package [@rehurek_lrec] was utilized to implement the baseline models, as well as the foundation for developing DocCit2Vec. We employed the same hyper-parameter settings as in [@P18-1222]. For Word2Vec, the embedding size was set to 100 with a window size of 50 and 5 epochs, using the *cbow* structure, and the default Gensim settings were followed. For Doc2Vec, the same embedding, window size, and epoch setting were adopted with the *pv-dbow* structure. For HyperDoc2Vec, the same embedding and window size were adopted, with 100 iterations and 1000 negative samplings, and with the initialization of Doc2Vec at five epochs. The same settings were adopted for DocCit2Vec as for HyperDoc2Vec. The model are implemented on a Linux server with 12 cores of Intel Xeon E5-1650 cpu and 128Gb memory installed with Anaconda 5.2.0 and Gensim 2.3.0.
Recommendation Experiments
--------------------------
As mention in Section \[cases\], we designed three cases for the citation recommendation experiment. Each case adopts different input query:
- Case 1: Utilize the averaged vector of the context words (50 words before and after a citation) and structural contexts.
- Case 2: Utilize the averaged vector of the context words and randomly selected structural contexts.
- Case 3: Utilize the averaged vector of the context words.
We adopt different similarity calculation methods for the best performance of each model, as described in [@P18-1222]. We employ the IN-for-OUT (I4O) method for Word2Vec (W2V) and HyperDoc2Vec (HD2V), which uses the averaged IN feature vectors to rank the OUT document vectors by the dot product. Doc2Vec implements an IN-for-IN (I4I) method, which first infers a vector from the IN feature vectors by applying the learned model, and then ranks the IN document vectors by the cosine similarity. In addition, as in [@P18-1222], we run Doc2Vec-nc (D2V-nc) on the training file without citations, and Doc2Vec-cacNev (D2V-cac) on the training file with “augmented contexts”, *i.e.*, each citation context is copied into the target document. For DocCit2Vec-avg (DC2V-avg) and DocCit2Vec-att (DC2V-att), we employ the same I4O method. For the evaluation, the recall, MAP, and nDCG are reported and compared for the top 10 results.
------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Recall MAP nDCG Recall MAP nDCG
W2V (Case 1) 27.25 13.74 19.51 20.47 10.54 14.71
W2V (Case 2) 26.50 13.74 19.51 20.47 10.55 14.71
W2V (Case 3) 26.06 13.21 18.66 20.15 10.40 14.49
D2V-nc (Case 1) 19.92 9.06 13.39 7.90 3.17 4.96
D2V-nc (Case 2) 19.89 9.06 13.38 7.90 3.17 4.96
D2V-nc (Case 3) 19.89 9.07 13.38 7.91 3.17 4.97
D2V-cac (Case 1) 20.51 9.24 13.68 7.91 3.17 4.97
D2V-cac (Case 2) 19.89 9.06 13.38 7.91 3.17 4.97
D2V-cac (Case 3) 20.51 9.24 13.69 7.89 3.17 4.97
HD2V (Case 1) **37.53** 19.64 27.20 28.41 14.20 20.37
HD2V (Case 2) **36.85** **19.64** **27.20** 28.43 14.20 20.39
HD2V (Case 3) **36.24** **19.32** **26.79** 28.41 14.20 20.37
DC2V-att (Case 1) 27.48 13.42 19.24 7.381 3.358 4.889
DC2V-att (Case 2) 25.01 12.37 17.66 6.06 2.73 3.98
DC2V-att (Case 3) 25.01 11.48 16.27 5.20 2.36 3.43
DC2V-avg (Case 1) 36.89 **20.44** **27.72** **44.23** **21.80** **31.34**
DC2V-avg (Case 2) 33.67 18.40 25.10 **40.37** **20.15** **28.69**
DC2V-avg (Case 3) 31.14 16.97 23.20 **40.37** **19.02**
------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Four observations can be made from the results (Table \[tab:result1\]). First, DocCit2Vec-avg demonstrated a superior performance on the larger sized dataset, DBLP, with a significant improvement. The recall was higher by approximately 12% to 15% according to the different cases compared to the second-best model HyperDoc2Vec, with 4% to 7% improvements for the MAP and 6% to 11% for the nDCG. Second, all the models yielded better performances for the medium-sized dataset ACL Anthology, except for DocCit2Vec-avg, which may reveal that DocCit2Vec-avg requires a larger volume of data to converge. HyperDoc2Vec yielded the best results for this dataset, followed by DocCit2Vec-avg with close scores. Third, all baseline models exhibit similar scores across the three cases except for DocCit2Vec-avg. It is observed that DocCit2Vec-avg constantly yielded the best scores for the first case, where all the structural contexts are included, and the second best for the second case, where the structural contexts are randomly picked. This indicates that the information on the structural contexts is embedded into the embedding vectors. Fourth, the performances of DocCit2Vec-att are among the lowest, suggesting that citation recommendation is not a suitable task for this model.
Classification Experiments
--------------------------
We conduct two classification experiments: topic classification [^4] and classification of the functionality of citations [^5]. The two experiments aim to test the performances of document and word vectors separately, where the first experiment adopts document vectors and the second uses words vectors. The dataset for topic classification includes 5,975 academic papers and 10 unique fields to which they belong. The dataset for the classification of the functionality of citations includes 2,824 citation contexts, each with a classified functionality, such as “PBas: Cited work used as a basis or starting point” , which represent 12 unique classes.
We employ three methods for the first experiment: The first uses a concatenation of IN and OUT vectors of the documents (“IN+OUT” in Table \[tab:result2\]), the second uses the IN vectors of the documents, and the third concatenates the IN or IN+OUT vectors with embedding vectors from DeepWalk [@Perozzi:2014:DOL:2623330.2623732]. For the second experiment, we utilize the averaged IN vector of the context words.
------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
F1-macro F1-macro
W2V (IN+OUT) 58.11 37.00 74.62 63.66 N/A N/A
W2V (IN) 57.83 36.90 76.61 66.94 **77.36** **56.52**
D2V-nc 78.70 70.91 82.67 76.16 63.51 6.47
D2V-cac 78.99 71.11 82.41 75.95 63.51 6.47
HD2V (IN+OUT) 80.26 73.72 82.38 76.11 N/A N/A
HD2V (IN) 79.12 72.78 82.38 76.30 75.63 54.33
DC2V-att (IN+OUT) 82.70 76.86 84.84 79.50 N/A N/A
DC2V-att (IN) **83.80** **78.43** **85.49** **80.59** 74.46 54.43
DC2V-avg (IN+OUT) 77.56 70.43 79.23 72.65 N/A N/A
DC2V-avg (IN) 75.28 68.18 77.28 70.36 75.91 54.67
------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
DocCit2Vec-att yields the best performance in topic classification (Table \[tab:result2\]), with F1-macro and F1-micro scores approximately 3% to 4% higher compared to the second-best model HyperDoc2Vec. DocCit2Vec-avg is ranked as the second lowest among all the models. For the second experiment, neither DocCit2Vec-att nor DocCit2Vec-avg is ranked at the top. First, the results reveal that DocCit2Ve-att improves the classification abilities of document embedding vectors, although not word embedding vectors. Second, the reason for the inferiority of DocCit2Vec-avg is that it takes multiple documents as input, and therefore it emphasizes the “similarity” between documents. In summary, attention focuses on “difference”, whereas the averaged layer emphasizes “similarity”.
Conclusion {#sec:sum}
==========
We propose a novel document embedding model, DocCit2Vec, with consideration of the “structural context”, to improve the recommendation performance for writing academic papers. Two implementations of the model are proposed: the first one comes with an average hidden layer (DocCit2Vec-avg) and the second with an attention hidden layer (DocCit2Vec-att). Experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of DocCit2Vec-avg for citation recommendation tasks. Furthermore, DocCit2Vec-att yields an effective performance for the classification task with the adoption of document embedding vectors. In the future, we plan to design more sophisticated neural networks, and combine with graph and keyword based approaches to further improve the performance.
[^1]: This work is partly supported by KAKEN (19H04116)
[^2]: https://scholar.google.com/
[^3]: https://www.mendeley.com/
[^4]: Cora dataset, https://people.cs.umass.edu/\~mccallum/data.html.
[^5]: Dataset from [@Teufel:2006:ACC:1610075.1610091].
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'A family $\mathcal N$ of closed subsets of a topological space $X$ is called a [*closed $k$-network*]{} if for each open set $U\subset X$ and a compact subset $K\subset U$ there is a finite subfamily $\mathcal F\subset\mathcal N$ with $K\subset\bigcup{\mathcal F}\subset \mathcal N$. A compact space $X$ is called [*supercompact*]{} if it admits a closed $k$-network $\mathcal N$ which is [*binary*]{} in the sense that each linked subfamily $\mathcal L\subset\mathcal N$ is centered. A closed $k$-network $\mathcal N$ in a topological group $G$ is [*invariant*]{} if $xAy\in\mathcal N$ for each $A\in\mathcal N$ and $x,y\in G$. According to a result of Kubiś and Turek [@KT], each compact (abelian) topological group admits an (invariant) binary closed $k$-network. In this paper we prove that the compact topological groups $S^3$ and ${\mathsf{SO}}(3)$ admit no invariant binary closed $k$-network.'
address:
- 'Department of Mathematics, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine'
- 'Instytut Matematyki, Uniwersytet Humanistyczno-Przyrodniczy Jana Kochanowskiego, Kielce, Poland'
author:
- Taras Banakh and Sławomir Turek
title: |
The groups $S^3$ and ${\mathsf{SO}}(3)$\
have no invariant binary $k$-network
---
Introduction
============
In this note we shall discuss the problem of the existence of invariant binary $k$-networks for compact $G$-spaces and compact topological groups.
A family ${\mathcal A}$ of subsets of a set $X$ is called
- [*linked*]{} if $A\cap B\ne\emptyset$ for all $A,B\in{\mathcal A}$;
- [*centered*]{} if $\cap {\mathcal F}\ne\emptyset$ for any finite subfamily ${\mathcal F}\subset{\mathcal A}$;
- [*binary*]{} if each linked subfamily of ${\mathcal F}$ is centered.
A family ${\mathcal A}$ of subsets of a topological space $X$ is called a [*$k$-network*]{} if for any open set $U\subset X$ and a compact subset $K\subset U$ there is a finite subfamily ${\mathcal F}\subset{\mathcal A}$ with $K\subset \cup{\mathcal F}\subset U$, see [@Gru §11]. If each set $A\in{\mathcal A}$ of a $k$-network is closed in $X$, then ${\mathcal A}$ will be called a [*closed $k$-network*]{}.
A compact space $X$ is called [*supercompact*]{} if $X$ admits a subbase of the topology such that each cover of $X$ by elements of the subbase contains a two-element subcover, see [@vM]. The following useful characterization of the supercompactness can be derived from Lemma 3.1 of [@KT]:
A compact Hausdorff space $X$ is supercompact if and only if $X$ admits a binary closed $k$-network.
In [@Mills] C.Mills proved that each compact topological group $G$ is supercompact, that is $G$ admits a binary closed $k$-network $\mathcal N$. This result was reproved by W.Kubiś and S.Turek [@KT] who observed that for an abelian compact topological group $G$ one can construct $\mathcal N$ so that it is [*left-invariant*]{} in the sense that $xA\in\mathcal N$ for each $A\in\mathcal N$ and $x\in G$. They also asked if such a left-invariant binary $k$-network can be constructed in each compact topological group.
It is natural to consider this problem in the more general context of $G$-spaces. By a $G$-space we understand a topological space $X$ endowed with a continuous action $\alpha:G\times X\to X$ of a topological group $G$. A family ${\mathcal F}$ of subsets of a $G$-space $X$ will be called [*$G$-invariant*]{} if $gF\in{\mathcal F}$ for each $F\in{\mathcal F}$ and each $g\in G$.
A compact $G$-space $X$ will be called [*$G$-supercompact*]{} if $X$ admits a $G$-invariant binary closed $k$-network.
Which compact $G$-spaces are $G$-supercompact?
We shall resolve this problem for the unit sphere $S^n=\{x\in{\mathbb R}^{n+1}:\|x\|=1\}$ in the Euclidean space ${\mathbb R}^{n+1}$, endowed with the natural action of the group ${\mathsf{SO}}(n+1)$ (of orientation preserving linear isometries of ${\mathbb R}^{n+1}$).
\[ex\]
1. The $0$-sphere $S^0=\{-1,1\}$ in ${\mathbb R}$ is ${\mathsf{SO}}(1)$-supercompact because the family ${\mathcal F}_0=\{\{-1\},\{1\}\}$ of singletons in an ${\mathsf{SO}}(1)$-invariant binary closed $k$-network for $S^0$.
2. The 1-sphere $S^1$ is ${\mathsf{SO}}(2)$-supercompact because the family ${\mathcal F}_1$ of all closed connected subsets of diameter less than $\sqrt{3}$ in $S^1$ is an ${\mathsf{SO}}(2)$-invariant binary closed $k$-network for the circle $S^1$.
It turns out that $S^0$ and $S^1$ are the unique examples of ${\mathsf{SO}}(n+1)$-supercompact spheres $S^n$.
\[main\] The unit sphere $S^n$ in the Euclidean space ${\mathbb R}^{n+1}$ is ${\mathsf{SO}}(n+1)$-supercompact if and only if $n\le 1$.
This theorem will be proved in Section \[s:p\]. Now we shall apply this theorem for finding an example of a compact topological group that admits no invariant binary closed $k$-network.
A family ${\mathcal F}$ of subsets of a group $G$ will be called
- [*left-invariant*]{} (resp. [*right-invariant*]{}) if for each $F\in{\mathcal F}$ and $g\in G$ we get $gF\in{\mathcal F}$ (resp. $Fg\in{\mathcal F}$);
- [*invariant*]{} if ${\mathcal F}$ is both left-invariant and right-invariant.
It is well-known that the 3-dimensional sphere $S^3$ has the structure of a compact topological group. Namely, $S^3$ is a group with respect to the operation of multiplication of quaternions (with unit norm). It is known [@CS §4.1] that for each isometry $f\in {\mathsf{SO}}(4)$ of $S^3$ there are quaternions $a,b\in S^3$ such that $f(x)=axb$ for all $x\in S^3$. This implies that a family ${\mathcal F}$ of subsets of the group $S^3$ is invariant if and only if it is ${\mathsf{SO}}(4)$-invariant. Now we see that Theorem \[main\] implies:
\[c1\] The compact topological group $S^3$ admits no invariant binary closed $k$-network.
It is known that the quotient group $S^3/\{-1,1\}$ of $S^3$ by the two-element subgroup $\{-1,1\}$ is isomorphic to the special orthogonal group ${\mathsf{SO}}(3)$. Using this fact, we can deduce from Corollary \[c1\] the following:
\[c2\] The compact topological group ${\mathsf{SO}}(3)$ admits no invariant binary closed $k$-network.
Has the group $S^3$ or ${\mathsf{SO}}(3)$ a left-invariant binary $k$-network?
Let $G$ be a compact abelian group and $X$ is a compact metrizable $G$-space. Is $X$ $G$-supercompact?
Let $G$ be a metrizable (separable) abelian topological group. Has $G$ an invariant binary closed $k$-network?
Proof of Theorem \[main\] {#s:p}
=========================
First we fix some natation. By ${\langle}\mathbf x,\mathbf y{\rangle}=\sum_{i=1}^nx_iy_i$ we denote the standard inner product of the Euclidean space ${\mathbb R}^n$. This inner product generates the norm $\|\mathbf x\|={\langle}\mathbf x,\mathbf x{\rangle}$. By $S^n=\{x\in{\mathbb R}^{n+1}:\|x\|=1\}$ we shall denote the unit sphere in ${\mathbb R}^{n+1}$.
For an Euclidean space $E={\mathbb R}^n$ let $E^*$ be the dual space of $E$, i.e., the space of linear functionals on $E$ endowed with the sup-norm. By Riesz’s Representation Theorem, for each functional $y^*\in E^*$ there is a unique vector $y\in E$ such that $y^*(x)={\langle}y,x{\rangle}$. So we can identify $E^*$ with $E$.
A [*convex body*]{} in an Euclidean space $E$ is a convex subset $C\subset E$ with non-empty interior in $E$. By $\partial C$ we denote the boundary of $C$ in $E$.
A functional $y^*\in E^*$ will be called a [*support functional*]{} to $C$ at a point $c\in\partial C$ if $$y^*(c)=\max x^*(C)>\inf y^*(C).$$ By the Hahn-Banach Theorem, each point $c\in\partial C$ of a convex body $C\subset E$ has a support functional $y^*$ with unit norm. If such a support functional is unique, then $c$ is called a [*smooth point*]{} of $\partial C$. It follows from the classical Mazur’s Theorem on the differentiablity of continuous convex functions on $E$ that the set of smooth points is dense in $\partial C$.
In an obvious way Theorem \[main\] follows from Example \[ex\] and the following theorem:
For any $n\ge 2$ and any closed subset $A\subset S^n$ of diameter $0<{\mathrm{diam}}(A)\le 1$ there is an isometry $f\in {\mathsf{SO}}(n+1)$ such that the family $\{A,f(A),f^2(A)\}$ is linked but not centered.
Let $E={\mathbb R}^{n+1}$ and $E^*$ be the dual space to $E$. By $S^*$ we denote the unit sphere in $E^*$.
\[l1\] There are distinct points $a_0,a_1\in A$ and a vector $b\in S^*$ such that ${\langle}b,a_0{\rangle}=0=\max_{a\in A}{\langle}b,a{\rangle}$ and ${\langle}b,a_1{\rangle}>-\frac12\|a_1-a_0\|$.
The lemma trivially holds if there are a vector $b\in S^*$ and two distinct points $a_0,a_1\in A$ such that ${\langle}b,a_0{\rangle}={\langle}b,a_1{\rangle}=\max_{a\in A}{\langle}b,a{\rangle}=0$.
So, assume that no such vectors $b$, $a_0,a_1$ exist. Let $L_A$ be the linear hull of the set $A$ and $C\subset L_A$ be the closed convex hull of the set $A\cup\{0\}$ in $L_A$. Since the set $A\subset S^n$ contains more than one point, the linear space $L_A$ has dimension $\dim L_A\ge 2$. It is clear that $C$ is a convex body in $L_A$. By Mazur’s Theorem, the set of smooth points is a dense in the boundary $\partial C$. Consequently, there is a smooth point $c\in \partial C$ such that $0<\|c\|<1$. Let $b^*\in L_A^*$ be the unique norm one support functional to $C$ at the point $c$. Let $a_0=\dfrac{c}{\|c\|}$ and observe that $a_0\in {\mathrm{conv}}(A)\subset C$. Since $b^*$ is a support functional at $c$, we get $b^*(c)=\max b^*(C)\ge b^*(0)=0$. We claim that $b^*(c)=0$. The strict inequality $b^*(c)>0$ would imply $b^*(c)=0=\max b^*(C)\ge b^*(a_0)=\dfrac{b^*(c)}{\|c\|}$ and $\|c\|\ge 1$, which contradicts the choice of $c$.
Let us show that the point $a_0=c/\|c\|$ belongs to the set $A$. Since $c\in {\mathrm{conv}}(A\cup\{0\})\setminus\{0\}$ by the Caratheodory Theorem, there are pairwise distinct points $a_1,\dots,a_k\in A$ and positive real numbers $\lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_k$ such that $\sum_{i=1}^k\lambda_i\le 1$ and $c=\sum_{i=1}^k\lambda_ia_i$. This equality and $b^*(c)=0=\max b^*(A)$ imply that $b^*(a_i)=0$ for all $1\le i\le k$. Now our assumption guarantees that $k=1$ (otherwise, $a_1$ and $a_2$ are two distinct points with $b^*(a_1)=b^*(a_2)=\max b^*(A)=0$, which is forbidden by our assumption). Therefore, $c=\lambda_1a_1$ and hence $a_0=c/\|c\|=c/\lambda_1=a_1\in A$.
Let $c^*\in L_A^*$ be any functional with unit norm such that $c^*(a_0)=0$ and $0<\|b^*-c^*\|\le \frac12$. Since the functional $c^*\ne b^*$ is not support at the point $c$, there is a point $a_1\in A$ such that $c^*(a_1)>0$.
Observe that $$\begin{aligned}
b^*(a_1)&= b^*(a_1-a_0)\ge c^*(a_1-a_0)-\|c^*-b^*\|\cdot\|a_1-a_0\|=\\
&=c^*(a_1)-\frac12\|a_1-a_0\|>-\frac12\|a_1-a_0\|
\end{aligned}.$$
By Riesz’s Representation Theorem, the functional $b^*$ can be identified with a unique vector $b\in L_A\subset E$ such that $b^*(x)={\langle}b,x{\rangle}$ for all $x\in L$. The vector $b$ and the points $a_0,a_1$ have the properties required in Lemma \[l1\].
Let $L$ be the 3-dimensional linear subspace of $E$ generated by the vectors $b,a_0,a_1$ (from Lemma \[l1\]) and let $L^\perp\subset E$ be its orthogonal complement. Then the space $E$ decomposes into the direct sum $L\oplus L^\perp$.
Find a (unique) point $a_2$ in the 2-sphere $L\cap S^n$ such that $\|a_2-a_0\|=\|a_2-a_1\|=\|a_1-a_0\|$ and ${\langle}b,a_2{\rangle}>0$. Let $c=\frac13(a_0+a_1+a_2)$ be the center of the equilateral triangle $\triangle a_0,a_1,a_2$. It follows from ${\langle}b,a_0{\rangle}=0$ and $0\ge {\langle}b,a_1{\rangle}>-\frac12\|a_0-a_1\|$ that ${\langle}b,a_2{\rangle}>\frac12\|a_0-a_1\|$. Consequently,
- ${\langle}b,c{\rangle}=\frac13({\langle}b,a_1{\rangle}+{\langle}b,a_2{\rangle})>0$.
\[cl2\] ${\langle}c,a{\rangle}>0$ for each $a\in A$.
Observe that ${\langle}a_2,a_0{\rangle}=\frac12(\|a_2\|^2+\|a_0\|^2-\|a_2-a_0\|^2)\ge\frac12(1+1-1)=\frac12$ and then $\|-a_2-a_0\|^2=\|a_2\|^2+\|a_0\|^2+2{\langle}a_2,a_0{\rangle}\ge 3$, which implies that $-a_2\notin A$ because ${\mathrm{diam}}(A)\le 1$. Then for each $a\in A$ we get $a_2\ne -a$ and hence ${\langle}a_2,a{\rangle}>-\|a_2\|\cdot\|a\|=-1$.
On the other hand, for $i\in\{0,1\}$ we get $${\langle}a_i,a{\rangle}=\frac12(\|a_i\|^2+\|a\|^2-\|a_0-a\|^2)\ge \frac12(1+1-1)=\frac12.$$ Then $${\langle}c,a{\rangle}=\tfrac13{\langle}a_0+a_1+a_2,a{\rangle}=\tfrac13({\langle}a_0,a{\rangle}+{\langle}a_1,a{\rangle}+{\langle}a_2,a{\rangle})>\tfrac13(\tfrac12+\tfrac12-1)=0.$$
Let $R:L\to L$ be the rotation of the 3-dimensional Euclidean space $L$ around the axis ${\mathbb R}c$ on the angle $2\pi/3$ such that $R(a_0)=a_1$, $R(a_1)=a_2$ and $R(a_2)=a_0$. Extend $R$ to an isometry $f\in {\mathsf{SO}}(n+1)$ of $E=L\oplus L^\perp$ letting $f(x+y)=R(x)+y$ for $(x,y)\in L\times L^\perp$. It remains to prove:
The system $\mathcal L=\{A,f(A),f^2(A)\}$ is linked but not centered.
The linkedness of the system $\mathcal L$ follows from the inclusion $\{a_0,a_1\}\subset A$ and the linkedness of the system $$\big\{\{a_0,a_1\},\{a_1,a_2\},\{a_2,a_0\}\big\}=\big\{\{a_0,a_1\},f(\{a_0,a_1\}),f^2(\{a_0,a_1\})\big\}.$$
To see that $\mathcal L$ is not centered, consider the half-spaces $H_b=\{x\in E:{\langle}b,x{\rangle}\le 0\}$ and $H_c=\{x\in E:{\langle}c,x{\rangle}>0\}$. The choice of the vectors $b,a_0,a_1,a_2$ guarantees that $a_0,a_1\in A\subset H_b$ but $a_2,c\notin H_b$. By Claim \[cl2\], $A\subset H_c$.
Let $H_c^L=H_c\cap L$ and $H_b^L=H_b\cap L$. The inclusions $b,c\in L$ imply that $H_b=H_b^L\oplus L^\perp$ and $H_c=H_c^L\oplus L^\perp$.
It follows that $R(H_c^L)=H_c^L$ and hence $f(H_c)=H_c$. Observe that $$A\cap f(A)\cap f^2(A)\subset H_c\cap H_b\cap f(H_b)\cap f^2(H_b)=(H_c^L\cap H_b^L\cap R(H_b^L)\cap R^2(H_b^L))\oplus L^\perp.$$
Now to see that $A\cap f(A)\cap f^2(A)=\emptyset$ it suffices to prove that the intersection $H^L=H_c^L\cap H_b^L\cap R(H_b^L)\cap R^2(H_b^L)$ is empty. Assuming that this intersection contains some point $h$, we conclude that it contains its rotations $R(h)$ and $R^2(h)$ and also the center $c_h=\frac13(h+R(h)+R^2(h))$ of the equilateral triangle $\{h,R(h),R^2(h)\}$ (by the convexity of $H^L$). The center $c_h$ lies on the axis ${\mathbb R}\cdot c$ of the rotation $R$. Taking into account that $c_h\in H_c$, we conclude that ${\langle}c,c_h{\rangle}>0$ and hence $c\in (0,+\infty)\cdot c_h\subset H_b$, which contradicts the inequality $(*)$.
J. Conway, D. Smith, [*On quaternions and octonions: their geometry, arithmetic, and symmetry*]{}, A K Peters, Ltd., Natick, MA, 2003.
G. Gruenhage, [*Generalized metric spaces*]{}, in: Handbook of set-theoretic topology (K.Kunen, J.Vaughan, Eds.), 423–501, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984.
W.Kubiś, S.Turek, [*A decomposition theorem for compact groups with application to supercompactness*]{}, to appear in Central European J. Math. (also available at: arXiv:1010.3329).
C. Mills, [*Compact groups are supercompact*]{}, seminar report from the Faculty of Mathematics, Free University of Amsterdam, September 1978.
J. van Mill, [*Supercompactness and Wallman spaces*]{}, Math. Centre Tracts, No. 85. Math. Centrum, Amsterdam, 1977.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'Training a *denoising autoencoder* neural network requires access to truly clean data, a requirement which is often impractical. To remedy this, we introduce a method to train an autoencoder using only noisy data, having examples with and without the signal class of interest. The autoencoder learns a partitioned representation of signal and noise, learning to reconstruct each separately. We illustrate the method by denoising birdsong audio (available abundantly in uncontrolled noisy datasets) using a convolutional autoencoder.'
bibliography:
- '../../../refs.bib'
title: |
Denoising without access to clean data\
using a partitioned autoencoder
---
Introduction {#sec:intro}
============
An autoencoder (AE) is a neural network trained in unsupervised fashion, to encode its input to some latent representation and to decode that representation to a faithful reconstruction of its input. The autoencoder can then be used as a codec, or to convert data to its latent representation for downstream processing such as classification. The *denoising autoencoder* (DAE) is a variant of this in which the inputs are combined with some corruption (such as additive noise or masking), and the system is trained to recover the clean, de-noised data [@Vincent:2010]. The DAE training scheme can be used in denoising applications, and is also a popular way to encourage the autoencoder to learn a more meaningful latent representation of the data. Autoencoders including the DAE have yielded leading results in recent years in deep learning for signal processing [@Vincent:2010; @Lecun:2015].
However, there is a significant problem with the DAE approach which hampers its use in practical applications: it may often be impossible to supply truly clean data. This is common in our application example—natural sound recordings—but also for video, image and audio applications across many domains. In fact, objects/events are often sparsely represented in data while background and other noise are densely represented, meaning that it is often easy to provide “noise-only” examples while difficult to provide “noise-free” examples.
In this paper we propose an alternative approach to train an AE so that it can perform denoising, given training data which can only be weakly labelled as “noise-only” or “noise and possible signal”. The system learns a partitioned latent representation, with identifiable noise and signal coefficients, and can then perform denoising and/or recover a signal-only latent representation for further analysis. The method is general-purpose; we illustrate it here with an application to denoising birdsong audio spectrograms.
Partitioned autoencoders {#sec:method}
========================
A standard AE learns a function of the form $
\xhat = g(f(\x))
$ where $\x$ is an input datum (a matrix, in this paper), and the autoencoder is composed of encoder $f(\cdot)$ and decoder $g(\cdot)$. The DAE learns a function $
\xhat = g(f(u(\x)))
$ where $u(\cdot)$ is a stochastic noise corruption process. The training objective is such that $\xhat$ is encouraged to be as close to $\x$ as possible, often $\sum_i{\|\x_i - \xhat_i\|^2}$ where $||\cdot||$ is the Frobenius norm and the sum is taken over a minibatch of training data. (A minibatch is a small subset of training data used for one iteration of stochastic gradient descent \[SGD\].) Given this objective, in practice a DAE will learn to denoise its input to the extent that $\x$ itself is clean, having no incentive to “overshoot” and remove any noise that may be intrinsic to the original $\x$. The latent representation output from $f(\cdot)$ parametrises the manifold on which the reconstructed signal data lie. Information about the noise present in each datum is not captured, except implicitly as $\x - \xhat$ if $\xhat$ is a good estimate.
Many equivalent parametrisations of the manifold may be possible, some allowing a more semantic interpretation of each latent coefficient than others, and the standard AE or DAE does not distinguish among these parametrisations. There has been recent interest in adapting the training schemes of autoencoders such that the latent representation is explicitly semantic, capturing attributes of the input in specific subsets of the latent variables [@Kulkarni:2015; @Cheung:2015]. We refer to these as *partitioned autoencoders* since the latent variables are partitioned into subsets which are treated differently from each other during training. Crucially, in this prior work the training scheme relies heavily on the existence of large structured datasets: in [@Cheung:2015] a balanced dataset of labelled digit images; in [@Kulkarni:2015] a dataset of faces constructed through systematic variation of attributes such as pose and lighting. Without such known structure in the training data, their proposed training schemes will be either impossible to apply, or biased by the presence of unbalanced or correlated factors in the training data.
Our present motivation is to learn a denoising representation, trained using data which does not contain truly clean examples. If we can develop a scheme that learns to represent both signal and noise, but partitioning them into separate latent coefficients, then we will be able to perform denoising or further analysis by using only the “foreground” (signal) coefficients and setting the remainder to zero. The scheme of [@Kulkarni:2015] would be appropriate if the SNR of each training example were known and systematically varied, but in uncontrolled datasets this information is rarely available. Instead we propose a scheme based on the observation that many scenarios consist of sparsely-present foreground and densely-present background, and so noise-only training data is much easier to come by than signal-only.
Our training scheme is based on a standard autoencoder reconstruction objective, augmented with a structured regularisation of the latent variables. In order to encourage the model to use the background latents to represent noise and never to represent signal, we add a soft regulariser that penalises foreground latent activation for the noise-only examples. For each training example $\x$ associated with a weak label $y$ taking the value 1 if the example is a “noise-only” example and 0 otherwise, we train an autoencoder by minimising the following loss function: $$l(\x, y) = \|\x - \xhat\|^2 + \frac{\lambda y}{\cbar} \|\c \odot f(\x)\|^2$$ where $\xhat = g(f(\x))$, $\lambda$ is a regularisation coefficient, $\odot$ represents elementwise multiplication, $\c$ is a masking matrix containing 1 for latents which should represent foreground and 0 otherwise, and $\cbar$ the mean value of $\c$. We will construct our training minibatches with a fixed proportion of noise-only items at each iteration. The value used for $\lambda$ will be relatively large, to impose a soft constraint pushing a subset of the latent values to zero in the case of noise-only items (Figure \[fig:partitionaesystem\_training\], Figure \[fig:partaegrid1\]). This encourages the learned representation to use the non-regularised latents for the foreground signal. The parameters of $f(\cdot)$ and $g(\cdot)$ will be optimised through SGD. Once trained, denoising is achieved by reconstructing using *only* the foreground latents, i.e. setting the others to zero (Figure \[fig:partitionaesystem\_denoi\]).
Figure \[fig:partaegrid1\] emphasises that the proportion of latents dedicated to foreground vs. background, and the balance of “signal-plus-noise” and “noise-only” examples in a minibatch, are independent configuration choices. We tend to reserve 25% of latents for background, and 25% of a minibatch as noise-only; in our evaluation we will evaluate the impact of varying the balance of latents.
Note that the regularisation scheme is asymmetric: it encourages some latents to zero in certain cases, but it does not prevent them from being zero in the other cases. In principle the system could simply never use those latents; however the reconstruction cost encourages the system to use them to improve reconstruction in cases where it has that freedom. The asymmetry also means that the important aspect of data labelling is to identify “noise-only” items with high precision. If some “noise-only” items are not labelled as such, the system is free to represent them without making use of those latents. The scheme can thus be used on datasets which are too large to label completely, but in which a subset of noise-only examples can be identified.
![Our training scheme aims to reconstruct all the minibatch items, while regularising some of the latents.[]{data-label="fig:partitionaesystem_training"}](neuralnets/partitionaesystem_training){width="0.8\columnwidth"}
![Regularisation is applied to the subset of latents intended to represent signal, and only for noise-only examples.[]{data-label="fig:partaegrid1"}](neuralnets/partaegrid1){width="0.6\columnwidth"}
![Once trained, the system can denoise by reconstructing using only a subset of the latents (setting others to zero).[]{data-label="fig:partitionaesystem_denoi"}](neuralnets/partitionaesystem_denoi){width="0.8\columnwidth"}
Convolutional partitioned autoencoder for audio spectrograms {#sec:convae}
============================================================
The training scheme can be applied to various autoencoder architectures. Convolutional neural networks have recently proven to be powerful for many tasks, while relatively easy to train because they have far fewer free parameters than an equivalent fully-connected network [@Lecun:2015; @Dieleman:2014]. In our application we aim to extract information from audio spectrograms, indexed by time and frequency. We will thus use an autoencoder which is convolutional in time and fully-connected in frequency, as is standard for recent neural network audio analysis [@Dieleman:2014]. Given an input matrix $\x$ indexed by discrete time $n$ and frequency $h$, we define our encoding function to be $$f(\x) = mp ( r ( {\mathbf W^c} \star (\x - \hat{\mu})/\hat{\sigma} ) )$$ where ${\mathbf W^c}$ is a tensor of coding weights indexed by time $m$ frequency $h$ and latent index $k$, $r(\cdot)$ is a rectified linear unit nonlinearity, $mp(\cdot)$ represents the max-pooling operation applied along the time axis, $\hat{\mu}$ and $\hat{\sigma}$ are the frequency-wise means and standard deviations estimated from the training set and used for normalisation, and $\star$ indicates one-dimensional convolution as follows: $$(A \star B)_{n,k} = \sum_{m=1}^M{\sum_{h=1}^H{ a_{m,h,k} b_{n-m,h} }} \quad n \in [1,N], k \in [1,K]$$ resulting in a matrix indexed by time $n$ and latent index $k$.
Our decoding function is $$g(f(\x)) = {\mathbf W^d} \star mp^{-1}(f(\x))$$ where ${\mathbf W^d}$ is a tensor of decoding weights, and $mp^{-1}(\cdot)$ is the inverse of the max-pooling operation (the approximate inverse, as the non-maximal values are reconstituted by zeros).
In this temporally convolutional architecture, the mask matrix $\c$ is implemented as identical frame-wise mask matrices, with $k$ indexing the set of latent time series.
Our data will be non-negative. Data normalisation at the input is important for effective training, hence the use of $\hat{\mu}$ and $\hat{\sigma}$ [@Montavon:2012]. However we do not undo the normalisation at the decoder outputs: the non-negative target and the rectifier then give the property that the decoder learns a non-negative parts-based reconstruction. We do not use bias units, as we found the resulting system easier to train (cf. [@Paine:2014; @Memisevic:2014]).
For the evaluation that follows, fixed configuration details are: input spectrograms have 512 time frames and 32 frequency bins, and we use 32 latent variables. Convolution filters have a length of 9 time frames. Our max-pooling downsamples the time axis by a factor of 16. We train the network using AdaDelta to control the SGD learning rates [@Zeiler:2012]. We do not use dropout. We initialise the tensor of filters as a set of $K$ random orthogonal unit vectors of length $MH$, reshaping this to the tensor of shape $M \times H \times K$ (cf. [@Saxe:2013]). In this study we explore only a single-layer autoencoder. Our approach applies straightforwardly to a deep autoencoder, and a deeper system would be expected to have a broader ability to generalise.
Evaluation {#sec:eval}
==========
We test our approach using a task to denoise birdsong audio spectrograms (Figure \[fig:spectrogramexample\]). As foreground we use recordings of chiff chaff (similarly to [@Stowell:2013; @Stowell:2013d]). For evaluation purposes we wish to add a background that offers a substantial test: it should be diverse, nonstationary and contain significant energy in the same frequency band as the birdsong. After considering many available options we settled on recorded restaurant noise, which contains multi-speaker human speech as well as diverse percussive sound events. We add this background noise, both to create a known amount of “intrinsic” noise in the examples, and to create “noise-only” examples.
Our system is implemented in the Theano framework [@Theano:2012] making use of GPU processing. To create a diverse training/validation dataset within the constraints of limited GPU memory, we take advantage of the approximate additive nature of audio spectrograms as follows. In each experiment we load 30 seconds of signal, of intrinsic noise and extrinsic noise, and store their spectrograms to the GPU. Then to generate each “signal-plus-noise” datum we randomly sample 1.5 second segments from each of the three sources and mix them. To generate a “noise only” datum we sample only from the extrinsic noise source. This creates a large generative dataset within limited memory. We also experimented with replacing the 30 second source material regularly throughout training but this made little difference, so we do not employ that in the present results.
Our audio sources use sample rate 22.05 kHz, analysed using 128 bin FFTs with 50% hop, and the frequency axis then reduced to 32 bins of interest for the birdsong (1.7–7.2 kHz). Within this frequency band, we added intrinsic noise to give an SNR -10 dB, then extrinsic noise to give an SNR of -30 dB. The extrinsic noise corresponds to the “noise-only” items that would be provided in practice. The intrinsic noise is added for evaluation only, to judge whether the system can remove it (Figure \[fig:partitionaesystem\_denoi\_eval\]). We study two cases where the intrinsic and extrinsic noise sources are matched or unmatched.
![For evaluation only (not for application), we construct our “signal+noise” examples from clean signal plus added intrinsic noise, so that we can evaluate SNR against the truly clean signal which the system never accesses.[]{data-label="fig:partitionaesystem_denoi_eval"}](neuralnets/partitionaesystem_denoi_eval){width="0.99\columnwidth"}
![Reconstruction SNRs measured on the validation data, for the partitioned AE or DAE. Intrinsic and extrinsic noise may be matched (upper plot) or unmatched (lower plot). Experiments are performed separately with three different noise source recordings, and the error bars show the range across three experiments. The large error bars are due to individual differences and not random variation (inspected by eye).[]{data-label="fig:runplots"}](pics/runlog_caelog_agg_a){width="0.9\columnwidth"}
![Reconstruction SNRs measured on the validation data, for the partitioned AE or DAE. Intrinsic and extrinsic noise may be matched (upper plot) or unmatched (lower plot). Experiments are performed separately with three different noise source recordings, and the error bars show the range across three experiments. The large error bars are due to individual differences and not random variation (inspected by eye).[]{data-label="fig:runplots"}](pics/runlog_caelog_agg_b){width="0.9\columnwidth"}
We test our partitioned AE at various settings for the proportion of latents regularised, and also a standard DAE using the same training data, configured to use the extrinsic noise as the additive corruption $u(\cdot)$ in the DAE training process. In all cases we fix $\lambda=0.75$ and train with minibatches of size 16, and $10^6$ iterations of SGD.
Results evaluated on separately-sampled validation data (Figure \[fig:runplots\]) show a number of interesting properties. Firstly, all methods perform best against their explicit objective in every case: i.e. their best SNR is the one relating to their objective function (simple reconstruction for the proposed system, reconstruction of the partly-clean input for the DAE). However, the statistic of interest is reconstruction of the truly-clean spectrogram. In matched conditions (upper plot), the proposed system strongly outperforms the DAE on this measure. Its strong performance is stable across a broad range of settings for the proportion of latents regularised (all except the extremes). The poor results at the setting with regularisation of all latents (100%) confirm that the regularisation used is strong: if applied to all latents, it causes underfitting. It is not merely the presence of regularisation that improves the results, but the partitioning scheme.
In unmatched conditions (lower plot) the strong performance is not sustained. The DAE continues to perform well at its partial-denoising task, but our proposed DAE fails to generalise across diverse background recordings. It seems likely that this is due to the small size and depth of the current setup: a single-layer autoencoder with only 32 convolutional filters has limited ability to approximate arbitrary functions. The strong performance in matched conditions suggests further study of the method with deeper networks. However, note that matched conditions are common in applications such as ours, where the noise-only examples can be taken from the main field recording sessions.
Conclusions {#sec:conc}
===========
We have introduced a partitioned autoencoder that can learn to denoise data with better fidelity than a standard DAE, in the common practical case where no noise-free examples are available for training. In matched conditions this partitioned scheme makes better use of the available data than a DAE. Unlike a DAE, our partitioned autoencoder learns to represent the signal and the noise content, and can reconstruct either or both. This may be part of its advantage over a standard DAE, which does not learn to represent the noise content. Further work will explore deeper/wider architectures to improve the generality, and use the representations to support classification and other tasks.
Acknowledgments {#sec:ack}
===============
We gratefully thank Pavel Linhart for recording the chiff chaff bird sounds used in this study.
DS is supported by EPSRC Fellowship EP/L020505/1.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We study the boundedness of intrinsic square functions and their commutators on generalized Orlicz-Morrey spaces $M^{\Phi,\varphi}(\Rn)$. In all the cases the conditions for the boundedness are given either in terms of Zygmund-type integral inequalities on weights $\varphi(x,r)$ without assuming any monotonicity property of $\varphi(x,r)$ on $r$.'
---
Boundedness of Intrinsic Square Functions and their Commutators on Generalized Orlicz-Morrey Spaces
Vagif S. Guliyev$^{a,b,}$[^1], Fatih Deringoz$^{a,1}$
Introduction
============
The intrinsic square functions were first introduced by Wilson in [@Wilson1; @Wilson2]. They are defined as follows. For $0<\alpha\leq 1$, let $C_{\alpha}$ be the family of functions $\phi : \Rn\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ such that $\phi$’s support is contained in $\{x:|x|\leq 1\},\ \displaystyle \int\phi dx =0$, and for $x,\ x'\in \mathbb{R}^{n}$, $$|\phi(x)-\phi(x')|\leq|x-x'|^{\alpha}.$$ For $(y,\ t)\in \mathbb{R}_{+}^{n+1}$ and $f\in L_{loc}^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{n})$ , set $$A_{\alpha}f(t,\ y)\equiv\sup_{\phi\in C_{\alpha}}|f*\phi_{t}(y)|,$$ where $\displaystyle \phi_{t}(y)=t^{-n}\phi(\frac{y}{t})$ . Then we define the varying-aperture intrinsic square (intrinsic Lusin) function of $f$ by the formula $$G_{\alpha,\beta}(f)(x)=\left(\int\int_{\Gamma_{\beta}(x)}(A_{\alpha}f(t,y))^{2}\frac{dydt}{t^{n+1}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}$$ where $\Gamma_{\beta}(x)=\{(y,\ t)\in \mathbb{R}_{+}^{n+1}:|x-y|<\beta t\}$. Denote $G_{\alpha,1}(f)=G_{\alpha}(f)$ .
This function is independent of any particular kernel, such as Poisson kernel. It dominates pointwise the classical square function(Lusin area integral) and its real-variable generalizations. Although the function $G_{\alpha,\beta}(f)$ is depend of kernels with uniform compact support, there is pointwise relation between $G_{\alpha,\beta}(f)$ with different $\beta$: $$G_{\alpha,\beta}(f)(x)\leq\beta^{\frac{3n}{2}+\alpha}G_{\alpha}(f)(x)\ .$$ We can see details in [@Wilson1].
The intrinsic Littlewood-Paley $\mathrm{g}$-function and the intrinsic $g_{\lambda}^{*}$ function are defined respectively by $$g_{\alpha}f(x)=\left(\int_{0}^{\infty}(A_{\alpha}f(y,t))^{2}\frac{dt}{t}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}},$$ $$g_{\lambda,\alpha}^{*}f(x)=\left(\int\int_{\mathbb{R}_{+}^{n+1}}\left(\frac{t}{t+|x-y|}\right)^{n\lambda}(A_{\alpha}f(y,t))^{2}\frac{dydt}{t^{n+1}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}.$$ Let $b$ be a locally integrable function on $\mathbb{R}^{n}$. Setting $$A_{\alpha,b}f(t,y)\equiv\sup_{\phi\in C_{\alpha}}\left|\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}[b(x)-b(z)]\phi_{t}(y-z)f(z)dz\right|,$$ the commutators are defined by $$[b,G_{\alpha}]f(x)=\left(\int\int_{\Gamma(x)}(A_{\alpha,b}f(t,y))^{2}\frac{dydt}{t^{n+1}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}$$ $$[b,g_{\alpha}]f(x)=\left(\int_{0}^{\infty}(A_{\alpha,b}f(t,y))^{2}\frac{dt}{t}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}$$ and $$[b,g_{\lambda,\alpha}^{*}]f(x)=\left(\int\int_{\mathbb{R}_{+}^{n+1}}\left(\frac{t}{t+|x-y|}\right)^{\lambda n}(A_{\alpha,b}f(t,y))^{2}\frac{dydt}{t^{n+1}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}$$
Wilson [@Wilson1] proved that $G_{\alpha}$ is bounded on $L^{p}(\mathbb{R}^{n})$ for $1<p<\infty$ and $0<\alpha\leq 1$. After then, Huang and Liu [@HuLiu] studied the boundedness of intrinsic square functions on weighted Hardy spaces. Moreover, they characterized the weighted Hardy spaces by intrinsic square functions. In [@Wang2] and [@WangLiu], Wang and Liu obtained some weak type estimates on weighted Hardy spaces. In [@Wang1], Wang considered intrinsic functions and the commutators generated with BMO functions on weighted Morrey spaces. In [@GulShuk2013], Guliyev, Shukurov was proved the boundedness of intrinsic square functions and their commutators on generalized Morrey spaces. In [@GulIntrGWM], Guliyev considered intrinsic functions and the commutators generated with BMO functions on generalized weighted Morrey spaces. In [@LiNaYaZh], Liang et al. studied the boundedness of these operators on Musielak-Orlicz Morrey spaces.
In this paper, we will consider $G_{\alpha},\ g_{\alpha},\ g_{\lambda,\alpha}^{*}$ and their commutators on generalized Orlicz-Morrey spaces. Note that, the Orlicz-Morrey spaces were introduced and studied by Nakai in [@Nakai0]. Also the boundedness of the operators of harmonic analysis on Orlicz-Morrey spaces see also, [@DerGulSam; @GulDerArX; @GulDerHasJIA; @HasJFSA; @Nakai1; @Nakai2; @SawSugTan]. Our definition of Orlicz-Morrey spaces (see [@DerGulSam]) is different from that of Nakai [@Nakai0] and Sawano et al. [@SawSugTan].
By $A \lesssim B$ we mean that $A \le C B$ with some positive constant $C$ independent of appropriate quantities. If $A \lesssim B$ and $B \lesssim A$, we write $A\approx B$ and say that $A$ and $B$ are equivalent. Everywhere in the sequel $B(x,r)$ stands for the ball in $\mathbb{R}^n$ of radius $r$ centered at $x$ and $|B(x,r)|$ be the Lebesgue measure of the ball $B(x,r)$ and $|B(x,r)|=v_n r^n$, where $v_n$ is the volume of the unit ball in $\Rn$.
Preliminaries
=============
As is well known that Morrey [@Morrey] introduced the classical Morrey spaces to investigate the local behavior of solutions to second order elliptic partial differential equations (PDE). We recall its definition as $$M^{p,\lambda}(\Rn) = \left\{ f \in L^p_{\rm loc}(\Rn) : \left\| f\right\|_{M^{p,\lambda}}: = \sup_{x \in \Rn, \; r>0 } r^{-\frac{\lambda}{p}} \|f\|_{L^{p}(B(x,r))} < \i \right\},$$ where $0 \le \lambda \le n,$ $1\le p < \i$. $M^{p,\l}(\Rn)$ was an expansion of $L^p(\Rn)$ in the sense that $M^{p,0}(\Rn)=L^p(\Rn)$.
We recall the definition of Young functions.
\[def2\] A function $\Phi : [0,+\infty) \rightarrow [0,\infty]$ is called a Young function if $\Phi$ is convex, left-continuous, $\lim\limits_{r\rightarrow +0} \Phi(r) = \Phi(0) = 0$ and $\lim\limits_{r\rightarrow +\infty} \Phi(r) = \infty$.
From the convexity and $\Phi(0) = 0$ it follows that any Young function is increasing. If there exists $s \in (0,+\infty)$ such that $\Phi(s) = +\infty$, then $\Phi(r) = +\infty$ for $r \geq s$.
Let $\mathcal{Y}$ be the set of all Young functions $\Phi$ such that $$\label{2.1}
0<\Phi(r)<+\infty\qquad \text{for} \qquad 0<r<+\infty$$ If $\Phi \in \mathcal{Y}$, then $\Phi$ is absolutely continuous on every closed interval in $[0,+\infty)$ and bijective from $[0,+\infty)$ to itself.
Orlicz spaces, introduced in [@Orlicz1; @Orlicz2], are generalizations of Lebesgue spaces $L^p$. They are useful tools in harmonic analysis and its applications. For example, the Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator is bounded on $L^p$ for $1 < p < \infty$, but not on $L^1$. Using Orlicz spaces, we can investigate the boundedness of the maximal operator near $p = 1$ more precisely (see [@Kita1; @Kita2] and [@Cianchi1]).
(Orlicz Space). For a Young function $\Phi$, the set $$L^{\Phi}(\Rn)=\left\{f\in L^1_{loc}(\Rn): \int_{\Rn}\Phi(k|f(x)|)dx<+\infty
\text{ for some $k>0$ }\right\}$$ is called Orlicz space. If $\Phi(r)=r^{p},\, 1\le p<\i$, then $L^{\Phi}(\Rn)=L^{p}(\Rn)$. If $\Phi(r)=0,\,(0\le r\le 1)$ and $\Phi(r)=\i,\,(r> 1)$, then $L^{\Phi}(\Rn)=L^{\i}(\Rn)$. The space $L^{\Phi}_{\rm loc}(\Rn)$ endowed with the natural topology is defined as the set of all functions $f$ such that $f\chi_{_B}\in L^{\Phi}(\Rn)$ for all balls $B \subset \Rn$. We refer to the books [@KokKrbec; @KrasnRut; @RaoRen] for the theory of Orlicz Spaces.
$L^{\Phi}(\Rn)$ is a Banach space with respect to the norm $$\|f\|_{L^{\Phi}}=\inf\left\{\lambda>0:\int_{\Rn}\Phi\Big(\frac{|f(x)|}{\lambda}\Big)dx\leq 1\right\}.$$ We note that $$\int_{\Rn}\Phi\Big(\frac{|f(x)|}{\|f\|_{L^{\Phi}}}\Big)dx\leq 1.$$
For a Young function $\Phi$ and $0 \leq s \leq +\infty$, let $$\Phi^{-1}(s)=\inf\{r\geq 0: \Phi(r)>s\}\qquad (\inf\emptyset=+\infty).$$ If $\Phi \in \mathcal{Y}$, then $\Phi^{-1}$ is the usual inverse function of $\Phi$. We note that $$\label{younginverse}
\Phi(\Phi^{-1}(r))\leq r \leq \Phi^{-1}(\Phi(r)) \quad \text{ for } 0\leq r<+\infty.$$ A Young function $\Phi$ is said to satisfy the $\Delta_2$-condition, denoted by $\Phi \in \Delta_2$, if $$\Phi(2r)\le k\Phi(r) \text{ for } r>0$$ for some $k>1$. If $\Phi \in \Delta_2$, then $\Phi \in \mathcal{Y}$. A Young function $\Phi$ is said to satisfy the $\nabla_2$-condition, denoted also by $\Phi \in \nabla_2$, if $$\Phi(r)\leq \frac{1}{2k}\Phi(kr),\qquad r\geq 0,$$ for some $k>1$. The function $\Phi(r) = r$ satisfies the $\Delta_2$-condition but does not satisfy the $\nabla_2$-condition. If $1 < p < \infty$, then $\Phi(r) = r^p$ satisfies both the conditions. The function $\Phi(r) = e^r - r - 1$ satisfies the $\nabla_2$-condition but does not satisfy the $\Delta_2$-condition.
A Young function $\Phi$ is said to be of upper type p (resp. lower type p) for some $p\in[0,\i)$, if there exists a positive constant $C$ such that, for all $t\in[1,\i)$(resp. $t\in[0,1]$) and $s\in[0,\i)$, $$\Phi(st)\le Ct^p\Phi(s).$$
\[remlowup\] We know that if $\Phi$ is lower type $p_0$ and upper type $p_1$ with $1<p_0\le p_1<\i$, then $\Phi\in \Delta_2\cap\nabla_2$. Conversely if $\Phi\in \Delta_2\cap\nabla_2$, then $\Phi$ is lower type $p_0$ and upper type $p_1$ with $1<p_0\le p_1<\i$ (see for example [@KokKrbec]).
[@Ky1]\[Kylowupp\] Let $\Phi$ be a Young function which is lower type $p_0$ and upper type $p_1$ with $0<p_0\le p_1<\i$. Let $\widetilde{C}$ be a positive constant. Then there exists a positive constant $C$ such that for any ball $B$ of $\Rn$ and $\mu\in(0,\i)$ $$\int_{B}\Phi\left(\frac{|f(x)|}{\mu}\right)dx\le \widetilde{C}$$ implies that $\|f\|_{L^\Phi(B)}\le C\mu$.
For a Young function $\Phi$, the complementary function $\widetilde{\Phi}(r)$ is defined by $$\label{2.2}
\widetilde{\Phi}(r)=\left\{
\begin{array}{ccc}
\sup\{rs-\Phi(s): s\in [0,\infty)\}
& , & r\in [0,\infty) \\
+\infty&,& r=+\infty.
\end{array}
\right.$$ The complementary function $\widetilde{\Phi}$ is also a Young function and $\widetilde{\widetilde{\Phi}}=\Phi$. If $\Phi(r)=r$, then $\widetilde{\Phi}(r)=0$ for $0\leq r \leq 1$ and $\widetilde{\Phi}(r)=+\infty$ for $r>1$. If $1 < p < \infty$, $1/p+1/p^\prime= 1$ and $\Phi(r) =
r^p/p$, then $\widetilde{\Phi}(r) = r^{p^\prime}/p^\prime$. If $\Phi(r) = e^r-r-1$, then $\widetilde{\Phi}(r) = (1+r) \log(1+r)-r$. Note that $\Phi \in \nabla_2$ if and only if $\widetilde{\Phi} \in \Delta_2$. It is known that $$\label{2.3}
r\leq \Phi^{-1}(r)\widetilde{\Phi}^{-1}(r)\leq 2r \qquad \text{for } r\geq 0.$$
Note that Young functions satisfy the properties $$\label{sam1}
\Phi(\alpha t)\leq \alpha \Phi(t)$$ for all $0\le\a\le1$ and $0 \le t < \i$, and $$\label{sam2}
\Phi(\beta t)\geq \beta \Phi(t)$$ for all $\beta>1$ and $0 \le t < \i$.
The following analogue of the Hölder inequality is known, see [@Weiss].
[@Weiss] \[HolderOr\] For a Young function $\Phi$ and its complementary function $\widetilde{\Phi}$, the following inequality is valid $$\|fg\|_{L^{1}(\Rn)} \leq 2 \|f\|_{L^{\Phi}} \|g\|_{L^{\widetilde{\Phi}}}.$$
The following lemma is valid.
\[lem4.0\] [@BenSharp; @LiuWang; @Nakai0] Let $\Phi$ be a Young function and $B$ a set in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with finite Lebesgue measure. Then $$\|\chi_{_B}\|_{WL_{\Phi}(\Rn)} = \|\chi_{_B}\|_{L^{\Phi}(\Rn)} = \frac{1}{\Phi^{-1}\left(|B|^{-1}\right)}.$$
In the next sections where we prove our main estimates, we use the following lemma, which follows from Theorem \[HolderOr\], Lemma \[lem4.0\] and .
\[lemHold\] For a Young function $\Phi$ and $B=B(x,r)$, the following inequality is valid $$\|f\|_{L^{1}(B)} \leq 2 |B| \Phi^{-1}\left(|B|^{-1}\right) \|f\|_{L^{\Phi}(B)} .$$
(generalized Orlicz-Morrey Space) Let $\varphi(x,r)$ be a positive measurable function on $\Rn \times (0,\infty)$ and $\Phi$ any Young function. We denote by $M^{\Phi,\varphi}(\Rn)$ the generalized Orlicz-Morrey space, the space of all functions $f\in L^{\Phi}_{\rm loc}(\Rn)$ with finite quasinorm $$\|f\|_{M^{\Phi,\varphi}} = \sup\limits_{x\in\Rn, r>0}
\varphi(x,r)^{-1} \Phi^{-1}(r^{-n}) \|f\|_{L^{\Phi}(B(x,r))}.$$
According to this definition, we recover the generalized Morrey space $M^{p,\varphi}$ under the choice $\Phi(r)=r^{p},\,1\le p<\i$. If $\Phi(r)=r^{p},\,1\le p<\i$ and $\varphi(x,r)=r^{\frac{\lambda-n}{p}},\,0\le \lambda \le n$, then $M^{\Phi,\varphi}(\Rn)$ coincides with the Morrey space $M^{p,\lambda}(\Rn)$ and if $\varphi(x,r)=\Phi^{-1}(r^{-n})$, then $M^{\Phi,\varphi}(\Rn)$ coincides with the Orlicz space $L^{\Phi}(\Rn)$.
Intrinsic square functions in the spaces $M^{\Phi,\varphi}(\Rn)$
================================================================
The known boundedness statement for $G_{\alpha}$ on Orlicz spaces runs as follows.
[@LiNaYaZh]\[LiNaYaZhprop2.11-1\] Let $\a\in(0,1]$, $\Phi$ be a Young function which is lower type $p_0$ and upper type $p_1$ with $1<p_0\le p_1<\i$. Then $G_{\alpha}$ is bounded from $L^{\Phi}(\mathbb{R}^{n})$ to itself.
We will use the following statement on the boundedness of the weighted Hardy operator $$H^{\ast}_{w} g(t):=\int_t^{\infty} g(s) w(s) ds,~ \ \ 0<t<\infty,$$ where $w$ is a weight.
The following theorem was proved in [@GulJMS2013].
\[thm3.2.\] Let $v_1$, $v_2$ and $w$ be weights on $(0,\infty)$ and $v_1(t)$ be bounded outside a neighborhood of the origin. The inequality $$\label{vav01}
\sup _{t>0} v_2(t) H^{\ast}_{w} g(t) \leq C \sup _{t>0} v_1(t) g(t)$$ holds for some $C>0$ for all non-negative and non-decreasing $g$ on $(0,\i)$ if and only if $$\label{vav02}
B:= \sup _{t>0} v_2(t)\int_t^{\infty} \frac{w(s) ds}{\sup _{s<\tau<\infty} v_1(\tau)}<\infty.$$ Moreover, the value $C=B$ is the best constant for .
\[rem2.3.\] In and it is assumed that $\frac{1}{\i}=0$ and $0 \cdot \i=0$.
The following lemma was generalization of the Guliyev lemma [@GulDoc; @GulBook; @GulJIA] for Orlicz spaces.
\[lem3.3.\] Let $\a\in(0,1]$, $\Phi$ be a Young function which is lower type $p_0$ and upper type $p_1$ with $1<p_0\le p_1<\i$, $f\in L^{\Phi}_{\rm loc}(\Rn)$, $B=B(x_0,r)$, $x_0\in \mathbb{R}^n$ and $r>0$. Then for the operator $G_{\alpha}$ the following inequality is valid $$\label{CZdgs}
\|G_{\alpha} f\|_{L^{\Phi}(B)} \lesssim \frac{1}{\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)}
\int_{2r}^{\i} \|f\|_{L^{\Phi}(B(x_0,t))} \Phi^{-1}\big(t^{-n}\big) \frac{dt}{t}.$$
With the notation $2B=B(x_0,2r)$, we represent $f$ as $$f=f_1+f_2, \ \quad f_1(y)=f(y)\chi _{2B}(y),\quad
f_2(y)=f(y)\chi_{\dual {(2B)}}(y),$$ and then $$\|G_{\alpha}f\|_{L^{\Phi}(B)} \le \|G_{\alpha}f_1\|_{L^{\Phi}(B)} +\|G_{\alpha}f_2\|_{L^{\Phi}(B)}.$$ Since $f_1\in L^{\Phi}(\Rn)$, by Theorem \[LiNaYaZhprop2.11-1\], it follows that $$\|G_{\alpha}f_1\|_{L^\Phi(B)}\leq \|G_{\alpha}f_1\|_{L^\Phi(\Rn)}\leq C\|f_1\|_{L^\Phi(\Rn)}=C\|f\|_{L^\Phi(2B)}.$$ Then let us estimate $\|G_{\alpha}f_2\|_{L^{\Phi}(B)}$. $$|f_{2}*\displaystyle \phi_{t}(y)|=\left|t^{-n}\int_{|y-z|\leq t}\phi(\frac{y-z}{t})f_{2}(z)dz\right|\leq t^{-n}\int_{|y-z|\leq t}|f_{2}(z) |dz.$$ Since $x\in B(x_{0},r)$, $(y,t)\in\Gamma(x)$, we have $|x-z|\leq|z-y|+|x-y|\leq 2t$, and $$r\leq|x_{0}-z|-|x_{0}-x|\leq|x-z|\leq|x-y|+|y-z|\leq 2t.$$ So, we obtain $$\begin{aligned}
G_{\alpha}f_{2}(x) &\leq& \left(\int \int_{\Gamma(x)}\left|t^{-n}\int_{|y-z|\leq t}|f_{2}(z)|dz\right|^{2}\frac{dydt}{t^{n+1}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}
\\
{}&\leq&\left(\int_{t>r/2}\int_{|x-y|<t}\left(\int_{|x-z|\leq 2t}|f_{2}(z)|dz\right)^{2}\frac{dydt}{t^{3n+1}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}
\\
{}&\lesssim& \left(\int_{t>r/2}\left(\int_{|x-z|\leq 2t}|f_{2}(z)|dz\right)^{2}\frac{dt}{t^{2n+1}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}.\end{aligned}$$ By Minkowski’s inequality and $|x-z|\displaystyle \geq|x_{0}-z|-|x_{0}-x|\geq\frac{1}{2}|x_{0}-z|$, we have $$\begin{aligned}
\label{estGf2}
G_{\alpha}f_{2}(x) &\lesssim& \int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\left(\int_{t>\frac{|x-z|}{2}}\frac{dt}{t^{2n+1}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}|f_{2}(z)|dz \nonumber
\\
{}&\lesssim&\int_{|x_{0}-z|>2r}\frac{|f(z)|}{|x-z|^{n}}dz\lesssim\int_{|x_{0}-z|>2r}\frac{|f(z)|}{|x_{0}-z|^{n}}dz \nonumber
\\
{}&=&\int_{|x_{0}-z|>2r}|f(z)|\int_{|x_{0}-z|}^{+\infty}\frac{dt}{t^{n+1}}dz \nonumber
\\
{}&=&\int_{2r}^{\infty}\int_{2r<|x_{0}-z|<t}|f(z)|dz\, \frac{dt}{t^{n+1}} \nonumber
\\
{}&\lesssim&\int_{2r}^{\i} \|f\|_{L^{\Phi}(B(x_0,t))} \Phi^{-1}\big(t^{-n}\big) \frac{dt}{t}.\end{aligned}$$ The last inequality is by Lemma \[lemHold\]. Moreover, $$\label{ves2}
\|G_{\alpha}f_2\|_{L^{\Phi}(B)}\lesssim
\frac{1}{\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)}\int_{2r}^{\i}\|f\|_{L^{\Phi}(B(x_0,t))}
\Phi^{-1}\big(t^{-n}\big) \frac{dt}{t}.$$ Thus $$\|G_{\alpha}f\|_{L^\Phi(B)}\lesssim \|f\|_{L^{\Phi}(2B)}+ \frac{1}{\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)}
\int_{2r}^{\i}\|f\|_{L^\Phi (B(x_0,t))}\Phi^{-1}\big(t^{-n}\big) \frac{dt}{t}.$$ On the other hand, by we get $$\begin{aligned}
\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)&\thickapprox & \Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big) r^n \int_{2r}^{\i}\frac{dt}{t^{n+1}}
\\
& \lesssim & \int_{2r}^{\i} \Phi^{-1}\big(t^{-n}\big) \frac{dt}{t}\end{aligned}$$ and then $$\label{ves2fd}
\|f\|_{L^{\Phi}(2B)}\lesssim
\frac{1}{\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)}\int_{2r}^{\i} \|f\|_{L^{\Phi}(B(x_0,t))} \Phi^{-1}\big(t^{-n}\big) \frac{dt}{t}.$$ Thus $$\|G_{\alpha}f\|_{L^{\Phi}(B)}\lesssim \frac{1}{\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)} \int_{2r}^{\i}
\|f\|_{L^\Phi (B(x_0,t))} \Phi^{-1}\big(t^{-n}\big) \frac{dt}{t}.$$
\[thm4.4.\] Let $\a\in(0,1]$, $\Phi$ be a Young function which is lower type $p_0$ and upper type $p_1$ with $1<p_0\le p_1<\i$ and the functions $(\varphi_1,\varphi_2)$ and $\Phi$ satisfy the condition $$\label{eq3.6.VZPot}
\int_{r}^{\i} \Big({\mathop{\rm ess \; inf}\limits}_{t<s<\i}\frac{\varphi_1(x,s)}{\Phi^{-1}\big(s^{-n}\big)}\Big) \, \Phi^{-1}\big(t^{-n}\big)\frac{dt}{t} \le C \, \varphi_2(x,r),$$ where $C$ does not depend on $x$ and $r$. Then $G_{\alpha}$ is bounded from $M^{\Phi,\varphi_1}(\Rn)$ to $M^{\Phi,\varphi_2}(\Rn)$.
By Lemma \[lem3.3.\] and Theorem \[thm3.2.\] we have $$\begin{split}
\|G_{\a} f\|_{M^{\Phi,\varphi_2}(\Rn)} & \lesssim \sup\limits_{x\in\Rn, r>0}
\varphi_2(x,r)^{-1}\,
\int_{r}^{\i} \Phi^{-1}\big(t^{-n}\big) \|f\|_{L^{\Phi}(B(x,t))}\frac{dt}{t}
\\
& \lesssim \sup\limits_{x\in\Rn, r>0}
\varphi_1(x,r)^{-1} \Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big) \|f\|_{L^{\Phi}(B(x,r))}
\\
& = \|f\|_{M^{\Phi,\varphi_1}(\Rn)}.
\end{split}$$
In [@Wilson1], the author proved that the functions $G_{\alpha}f$ and $g_{\alpha}f$ are pointwise comparable. Thus, as a consequence of Theorem \[thm4.4.\], we have the following result.
\[wucor1.5\] Let $\a\in(0,1]$, $\Phi$ be a Young function which is lower type $p_0$ and upper type $p_1$ with $1<p_0\le p_1<\i$ and the functions $(\varphi_1,\varphi_2)$ and $\Phi$ satisfy the condition , then $g_{\alpha}$ is bounded from $M^{\Phi,\varphi_1}(\Rn)$ to $M^{\Phi,\varphi_2}(\Rn)$.
The following lemma is an easy consequence of the inequality $$G_{\alpha,\beta}(f)(x)\leq\beta^{\frac{3n}{2}+\alpha}G_{\alpha}(f)(x)$$ which was proved in [@Wilson1] and the monotonicity of the norm $\|\cdot\|_{L^{\Phi}}$.
\[wulem2.3\] For $j\in \mathrm{Z}^{+}$, denote $$G_{\alpha,2^{j}}(f)(x)=\left(\int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{|x-y|\leq 2^{j}t}(A_{\alpha}f(y,t))^{2}\frac{dydt}{t^{n+1}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}$$ Let $\Phi$ be a Young function and $0<\alpha\leq 1$, then we have $$\Vert G_{\alpha,2^{j}}(f)\Vert_{L^{\Phi}(\mathbb{R}^{n})}\lesssim 2^{j(\frac{3n}{2}+\alpha)}\Vert G_{\alpha}(f)\Vert_{L^{\Phi}(\mathbb{R}^{n})}.$$
\[thm4.4.x\] Let $\a\in(0,1]$, $\Phi$ be a Young function which is lower type $p_0$ and upper type $p_1$ with $1<p_0\le p_1<\i$ and the functions $(\varphi_1,\varphi_2)$ and $\Phi$ satisfy the condition $$\label{eq3.6.VZPotx}
\int_{r}^{\i} {\mathop{\rm ess \; inf}\limits}_{t<s<\i}\frac{\varphi_1(x,s)}{\Phi^{-1}\big(s^{-n}\big)}\Phi^{-1}\big(t^{-n}\big)\frac{dt}{t} \le C \, \varphi_2(x,r),$$ where $C$ does not depend on $x$ and $r$. Then for $\lambda >3+\displaystyle \frac{2\alpha}{n}$, $g_{\lambda,\alpha}^{*}$ is bounded from $M^{\Phi,\varphi_1}(\Rn)$ to $M^{\Phi,\varphi_2}(\Rn)$.
$$\begin{aligned}
[g_{\lambda,\alpha}^{*}(f)(x)]^{2}& = &\displaystyle \int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{|x-y|<t}\left(\frac{t}{t+|x-y|}\right)^{n\lambda}(A_{\alpha}f(y,t))^{2}\frac{dydt}{t^{n+1}}
\\
{}&{}&+\int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{|x-y|\geq t}\left(\frac{t}{t+|x-y|}\right)^{n\lambda}(A_{\alpha}f(y,t))^{2}\frac{dydt}{t^{n+1}}
\\
{}&:=&I+II.\end{aligned}$$
First, let us estimate I. $$I\leq \displaystyle \int_{0}^{+\infty}\int_{|x-y|<t}(A_{\alpha}f(y,t))^{2}\frac{dydt}{t^{n+1}}\leq(G_{\alpha}f(x))^{2}$$ Now, let us estimate II. $$\begin{aligned}
II &\leq& \displaystyle \sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{2^{j-1}t\leq|x-y|\leq 2^{j}t}\left(\frac{t}{t+|x-y|}\right)^{n\lambda}(A_{\alpha}f(y,t))^{2}\frac{dydt}{t^{n+1}}
\\
{}&\lesssim &\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{2^{j-1}t\leq|x-y|\leq 2^{j}t}2^{-jn\lambda}(A_{\alpha}f(y,t))^{2}\frac{dydt}{t^{n+1}}
\\
{}&\lesssim & \sum_{j=1}^{\infty}2^{-jn\lambda}\int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{|x-y|\leq 2^{j}t}(A_{\alpha}f(y,t))^{2}\frac{dydt}{t^{n+1}}
\\
{}&:=&\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}2^{-jn\lambda}(G_{\alpha,2^{j}}(f)(x))^{2}\end{aligned}$$ Thus, $$\label{wueq7}
\Vert g_{\lambda,\alpha}^{*}(f) \Vert_{M^{\Phi,\varphi_2}(\Rn)}\leq\Vert G_{\alpha}f \displaystyle \Vert_{M^{\Phi,\varphi_2}(\Rn)}+\sum_{j=1}^{\i} 2^{-\frac{jn\lambda}{2}}\Vert G_{\alpha,2^{j}}(f) \Vert_{M^{\Phi,\varphi_2}(\Rn)}.$$ By Theorem \[thm4.4.\], we have $$\label{wueq8}
\Vert G_{\alpha}f\Vert_{M^{\Phi,\varphi_2}(\Rn)}\lesssim\Vert f\Vert_{M^{\Phi,\varphi_1}(\Rn)}.$$ In the following, we will estimate $\Vert G_{\alpha,2^{j}}(f) \Vert_{M^{\Phi,\varphi_2}(\Rn)}$. We divide $\Vert G_{\alpha,2^{j}}(f)\Vert_{L^{\Phi}(B)}$ into two parts. $$\label{wueq9}
\Vert G_{\alpha,2^{j}}(f)\Vert_{L^{\Phi}(B)}\leq\Vert G_{\alpha,2^{j}}(f_{1})\Vert_{L^{\Phi}(B)}+\Vert G_{\alpha,2^{j}}(f_{2})\Vert_{L^{\Phi}(B)},$$ where $f_{1}(y)=f(y)\chi_{2B}(y)$ , $f_{2}(y)=f(y)-f_{1}(y)$ . For the first part, by Lemma \[wulem2.3\] and , $$\Vert G_{\alpha,2^{j}}(f_{1})\Vert_{L^{\Phi}(B)} \lesssim 2^{j(\frac{3n}{2}+\alpha)}\Vert G_{\alpha}(f_{1})\Vert_{L^{\Phi}(\mathbb{R}^{n})}\lesssim2^{j(\frac{3n}{2}+\alpha)}\Vert f\Vert_{L^{\Phi}(2B)}$$ $$\label{wueq10}
\lesssim 2^{j(\frac{3n}{2}+\alpha)}\frac{1}{\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)}\int_{2r}^{\i} \|f\|_{L^{\Phi}(B(x_0,t))} \Phi^{-1}\big(t^{-n}\big) \frac{dt}{t}.$$ For the second part. $$\begin{aligned}
G_{\alpha,2^{j}}(f_{2})(x) &=& \left(\displaystyle \int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{|x-y|\leq 2^{j}t}(A_{\alpha}f(y,t))^{2}\frac{dydt}{t^{n+1}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}
\\
{}&=& \left(\int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{|x-y|\leq 2^{j}t}\left(\sup_{\phi\in C_{\alpha}}|f*\phi_{t}(y)|\right)^{2}\frac{dydt}{t^{n+1}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}
\\
{}&\leq& \left(\int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{|x-y|\leq 2^{j}t}\left(\int_{|z-y|\leq t}|f_{2}(z)|dz\right)^{2}\frac{dydt}{t^{3n+1}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}.\end{aligned}$$ Since $|x-z|\leq|z-y|+|x-y|\leq 2^{j+1}t$, we get $$\begin{aligned}
G_{\alpha,2^{j}}(f_{2})(x) &\leq& \left(\displaystyle \int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{|x-y|\leq 2^{j}t}\left(\int_{|x-z|\leq 2^{j+1}t}|f_{2}(z)|dz\right)^{2}\frac{dydt}{t^{3n+1}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}
\\
{}&\leq& \left(\int_{0}^{\infty}\left(\int_{|x-z|\leq 2^{j+1}t}|f_{2}(z)|dz\right)^{2}\frac{2^{jn}dt}{t^{2n+1}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}
\\
{}&\leq& 2^{\frac{jn}{2}}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\left(\int_{t\geq\frac{|x-z|}{2^{j+1}}}|f_{2}(z)|^{2}\frac{1}{t^{2n+1}}dt\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}dz
\\
{}&\leq& 2^{\frac{3jn}{2}}\int_{|x_{0}-z|>2r}\frac{|f(z)|}{|x-z|^{n}}dz.\end{aligned}$$ For $|x-z|\displaystyle \geq|x_{0}-z|-|x_{0}-x|\geq|x_{0}-z|-\frac{1}{2}|x_{0}-z|=\frac{1}{2}|x_{0}-z|$, so by Fubini’s theorem and Lemma \[lemHold\], we obtain $$\begin{aligned}
G_{\alpha,2^{j}}(f_{2})(x)&\leq& 2^{\frac{3jn}{2}}\int_{|x_{0}-z|>2r}\frac{|f(z)|}{|x_{0}-z|^{n}}dz
\\
{}&=& 2^{\frac{3jn}{2}}\int_{|x_{0}-z|>2r}|f(z)|\int_{|x_{0}-z|}^{\infty}\frac{1}{t^{n+1}}dtdz
\\
{}&\leq& 2^{\frac{3jn}{2}}\int_{2r}^{\infty}\int_{|x_{0}-z|<t}|f(z)|\frac{1}{t^{n+1}}dzdt
\\
{}&\leq& 2^{\frac{3jn}{2}}\int_{2r}^{\i} \|f\|_{L^{\Phi}(B(x_0,t))} \Phi^{-1}\big(t^{-n}\big) \frac{dt}{t}.\end{aligned}$$ So, $$\label{wueq11}
\Vert G_{\alpha,2^{j}}(f_{2})\Vert_{L^{\Phi}(B)}\lesssim 2^{\frac{3jn}{2}}\frac{1}{\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)}\int_{2r}^{\i} \|f\|_{L^{\Phi}(B(x_0,t))} \Phi^{-1}\big(t^{-n}\big) \frac{dt}{t}.$$ Combining , and , we have $$\Vert G_{\alpha,2^{j}}(f)\Vert_{L^{\Phi}(B)}\lesssim 2^{j(\frac{3n}{2}+\alpha)}\frac{1}{\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)}\int_{2r}^{\i} \|f\|_{L^{\Phi}(B(x_0,t))} \Phi^{-1}\big(t^{-n}\big) \frac{dt}{t}.$$
Thus by Theorem \[thm3.2.\] we have $$\begin{aligned}
\label{wueq12}
\|G_{\alpha,2^{j}} f\|_{M^{\Phi,\varphi_2}(\Rn)} & \lesssim & 2^{j(\frac{3n}{2}+\alpha)}\sup\limits_{x\in\Rn, r>0}
\varphi_2(x,r)^{-1}\,
\int_{r}^{\i} \Phi^{-1}\big(t^{-n}\big) \|f\|_{L^{\Phi}(B(x,t))}\frac{dt}{t}\nonumber
\\
{}& \lesssim & 2^{j(\frac{3n}{2}+\alpha)}\sup\limits_{x\in\Rn, r>0}
\varphi_1(x,r)^{-1} \Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big) \|f\|_{L^{\Phi}(B(x,r))}\nonumber
\\
{}& = & 2^{j(\frac{3n}{2}+\alpha)}\|f\|_{M^{\Phi,\varphi_1}(\Rn)}.\end{aligned}$$ Since $\lambda >3+\displaystyle \frac{2\alpha}{n}$, by , and , we have the desired theorem.
Commutators of the intrinsic square functions in the spaces $M^{\Phi,\varphi}(\Rn)$
===================================================================================
It is well known that the commutator is an important integral operator and plays a key role in harmonic analysis. In 1965, Calderon [@Cald1; @Cald2] studied a kind of commutators appearing in Cauchy integral problems of Lip-line. Let $K$ be a Calderón–Zygmund singular integral operator and $b \in BMO(\Rn)$. A well known result of Coifman, Rochberg and Weiss [@CRW] states that the commutator operator $[b, K] f = K(b f)-b \, Kf$ is bounded on $L_p(\Rn)$ for $1 < p < \infty$. The commutator of Calderón–Zygmund operators plays an important role in studying the regularity of solutions of elliptic partial differential equations of second order. The boundedness result was generalized to other contexts and important applications to some non-linear PDEs were given by Coifman et al. [@CLMS].
A function $f\in L^{1}_{loc}(\mathbb{R}^{n})$ is said to be in $BMO(\Rn)$ if $$\Vert f\Vert_{*}=\sup_{x\in \mathbb{R}^{n},r>0}\frac{1}{|B(x,r)|}\int_{B(x,r)}|f(y)-f_{B(x,r)}|dy<\infty,$$ where $f_{B(x,r)}=\displaystyle \frac{1}{|B(x,r)|}\int_{B(x,r)}f(y)dy$.
Before proving the main theorems, we need the following lemmas.
\[rem2.4.\][@JohnNirenberg] $(1)~~$ The John–Nirenberg inequality: there are constants $C_1$, $C_2>0$, such that for all $b \in BMO(\Rn)$ and $\beta>0$ $$\left| \left\{ x \in B \, : \, |b(x)-b_{B}|>\beta \right\}\right|
\le C_1 |B| e^{-C_2 \beta/\| b \|_{\ast}}, ~~~ \forall B \subset \Rn.$$
$(2)~~$ The John–Nirenberg inequality implies that $$\label{lem2.4.xx}
\|b\|_\ast \thickapprox \sup_{x\in\Rn, r>0}\left(\frac{1}{|B(x,r)|} \int_{B(x,r)}|b(y)-b_{B(x,r)}|^p dy\right)^{\frac{1}{p}}$$ for $1<p<\infty$.
$(3)~~$ Let $b \in BMO(\Rn)$. Then there is a constant $C>0$ such that $$\label{propBMO}
\left|b_{B(x,r)}-b_{B(x,t)}\right| \le C \|b\|_\ast \ln \frac{t}{r} \;\;\; \mbox{for} \;\;\; 0<2r<t,$$ where $C$ is independent of $b$, $x$, $r$ and $t$.
\[Bmo-orlicz\] Let $b\in BMO$ and $\Phi$ be a Young function. Let $\Phi$ is lower type $p_0$ and upper type $p_1$ with $1<p_0\le p_1<\i$, then $$\|b\|_\ast \thickapprox \sup_{x\in\Rn, r>0}\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)\left\|b(\cdot)-b_{B(x,r)}\right\|_{L^{\Phi}(B(x,r))}.$$
By Hölder’s inequality, we have $$\|b\|_\ast \lesssim \sup_{x\in\Rn, r>0}\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)\left\|b(\cdot)-b_{B(x,r)}\right\|_{L^{\Phi}(B(x,r))}.$$
Now we show that $$\sup_{x\in\Rn, r>0}\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)\left\|b(\cdot)-b_{B(x,r)}\right\|_{L^{\Phi}(B(x,r))} \lesssim \|b\|_\ast .$$ Without loss of generality, we may assume that $\|b\|_\ast=1$; otherwise, we replace $b$ by $b/\|b\|_\ast$. By the fact that $\Phi$ is lower type $p_0$ and upper type $p_1$ and it follows that $$\int_{B(x,r)}\Phi\left(\frac{|b(y)-b_{B(x,r)}|\,\Phi^{-1}\big(|B(x,r)|^{-1}\big)}{\|b\|_\ast}\right)dy$$ $$=\int_{B(x,r)}\Phi\left(|b(y)-b_{B(x,r)}|\Phi^{-1}\big(|B(x,r)|^{-1}\big)\right)dy$$ $$\lesssim\frac{1}{|B(x,r)|}\int_{B(x,r)}\left[|b(y)-b_{B(x,r)}|^{p_0}+|b(y)-b_{B(x,r)}|^{p_1}\right]dy\lesssim 1.$$ By Lemma \[Kylowupp\] we get the desired result.
Note the, the Lemma \[Kylowupp\] for the variable exponent Lebesgue space $L^{p(\cdot)}$ case were proved in [@IzukiSaw].
The known boundedness statement for $[b,G_{\alpha}]$ on Orlicz spaces runs as follows.
[@LiNaYaZh]\[LiNaYaZhprop2.17-1\] Let $b\in BMO$, $\a\in(0,1]$, $\Phi$ be a Young function which is lower type $p_0$ and upper type $p_1$ with $1<p_0\le p_1<\i$. Then $[b,G_{\alpha}]$ is bounded from $L^{\Phi}(\mathbb{R}^{n})$ to itself.
\[lem5.1.\] Let $b\in BMO$, $\a\in(0,1]$, $\Phi$ be a Young function which is lower type $p_0$ and upper type $p_1$ with $1<p_0\le p_1<\i$. Then the inequality $$\label{eq5.1.}
\|[b,G_{\alpha}]f\|_{L^\Phi(B(x_0,r))} \lesssim \frac{\|b\|_{*}}{\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)}
\int_{2r}^{\i} \Big(1+\ln \frac{t}{r}\Big)\|f\|_{L^{\Phi}(B(x_0,t))} \Phi^{-1}\big(t^{-n}\big) \frac{dt}{t}$$ holds for any ball $B(x_0,r)$ and for all $f\in L^{\Phi}_{\rm loc}(\Rn)$.
For arbitrary $x_0 \in\Rn$, set $B=B(x_0,r)$ for the ball centered at $x_0$ and of radius $r$. Write $f=f_1+f_2$ with $f_1=f\chi_{_{2B}}$ and $f_2=f\chi_{_{\dual (2B)}}$. Hence $$\left\|[b,G_{\alpha}]f \right\|_{L^\Phi(B)} \leq
\left\|[b,G_{\alpha}]f_1 \right\|_{L^\Phi(B)}+
\left\|[b,G_{\alpha}]f_2 \right\|_{L^\Phi(B)}.$$ From the boundedness of $[b,G_{\alpha}]$ in $L^\Phi(\Rn)$ it follows that $$\begin{aligned}
\|[b,G_{\alpha}]f_1\|_{L^\Phi(B)} & \leq
\|[b,G_{\alpha}]f_1\|_{L^\Phi(\Rn)}
\\
& \lesssim \|b\|_{*} \, \|f_1\|_{L^\Phi(\Rn)} = \|b\|_{*} \, \|f\|_{L^\Phi(2B)}.\end{aligned}$$ For the second part, we divide it into two parts. $$\begin{aligned}
[b,G_{\alpha}]f_{2}(x) &=& \left(\displaystyle \int\int_{\Gamma(x)}\sup_{\phi\in C_{\alpha}}\left|\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}[b(x)-b(z)]\phi_{t}(y-z)f_{2}(z)dz\right|^{2}\frac{dydt}{t^{n+1}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}
\\
{}&\leq&\left(\int\int_{\Gamma(x)}\sup_{\phi\in C_{\alpha}}\left|\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}[b(x)-b_{B}]\phi_{t}(y-z)f_{2}(z)dz\right|^{2}\frac{dydt}{t^{n+1}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}
\\
{}&{}&+\left(\int\int_{\Gamma(x)}\sup_{\phi\in C_{\alpha}}\left|\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}[b_{B}-b(z)]\phi_{t}(y-z)f_{2}(z)dz\right|^{2}\frac{dydt}{t^{n+1}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}
\\
{}&:=& A+B.\end{aligned}$$ First, for $A$, we find that $$A=|b(x)-b_{B}|\left(\iint_{\Gamma(x)}\sup_{\phi\in C_{\alpha}}\left|\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\phi_{t}(y-z)f_{2}(z)dz\right|^{2}\frac{dydt}{t^{n+1}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}=|b(x)-b_{B}|G_{\alpha}f_{2}(x).$$ By and Lemma \[Bmo-orlicz\] , we can get $$\begin{aligned}
\left\|A\right\|_{L^\Phi(B)}&=&\left\||b(\cdot)-b_{B}|G_{\alpha}f_{2}(\cdot)\right\|_{L^\Phi(B)}
\\
{}&\leq&\left\|b(\cdot)-b_{B}\right\|_{L^\Phi(B)}\int_{2r}^{\i} \|f\|_{L^{\Phi}(B(x_0,t))} \Phi^{-1}\big(t^{-n}\big) \frac{dt}{t}
\\
{}&\leq&\frac{\|b\|_{*}}{\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)}\int_{2r}^{\i} \|f\|_{L^{\Phi}(B(x_0,t))} \Phi^{-1}\big(t^{-n}\big) \frac{dt}{t}.\end{aligned}$$ For $B$, since $|x-y|<t$, we get $|x-z|<2t$. Thus, by Minkowski’s inequality, $$\begin{aligned}
B &\leq& \left(\displaystyle \int\int_{\Gamma(x)}\left|\int_{|x-z|<2t}|b_{B}-b(z)||f_{2}(z)|dz\right|^{2}\frac{dydt}{t^{3n+1}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}
\\
{}&\lesssim& \left(\displaystyle \int_{0}^{\infty}\left|\int_{|x-z|<2t}|b_{B}-b(z)||f_{2}(z)|dz\right|^{2}\frac{dt}{t^{2n+1}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}
\\
{}& \leq & \displaystyle \int_{|x_{0}-z|>2r}|b_{B}-b(z)||f(z)|\frac{dz}{|x-z|^{n}}.
\\\end{aligned}$$ Since $|x-z|\displaystyle \geq\frac{1}{2}|x_{0}-z|$, we have $$\begin{aligned}
\left\|B\right\|_{L^\Phi(B)}&\lesssim \Big\|\int_{\dual (2B)} \frac{|b(z)-b_{B}|}{|x_0-z|^{n}}|f(z)|dz\Big\|_{L^\Phi(B)}
\\
&\thickapprox \frac{1}{\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)}\int_{\dual
(2B)}\frac{|b(z)-b_{B}|}{|x_0-z|^{n}}|f(z)|dz
\\
&\thickapprox \frac{1}{\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)}\int_{\dual
(2B)}|b(z)-b_{B}||f(z)|\int_{|x_0-z|}^{\infty}\frac{dt}{t^{n+1}}dz
\\
&\thickapprox \frac{1}{\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)} \int_{2r}^{\infty}\int_{2r\leq |x_0-z|\leq t}
|b(z)-b_{B}||f(z)|dz\frac{dt}{t^{n+1}}
\\
&\lesssim \frac{1}{\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)} \int_{2r}^{\infty}\int_{B(x_0,t)}
|b(z)-b_{B}||f(z)|dz\frac{dt}{t^{n+1}}.\end{aligned}$$
Applying Hölder’s inequality, by Lemma \[Bmo-orlicz\] and we get $$\begin{aligned}
\left\|B\right\|_{L^\Phi(B)} & \lesssim \frac{1}{\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)} \int_{2r}^{\infty}\int_{B(x_0,t)}
|b(z)-b_{B(x_0,t)}||f(z)|dz\frac{dt}{t^{n+1}}
\\
&\quad + \frac{1}{\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)} \int_{2r}^{\infty}|b_{B}-b_{B(x_0,t)}|
\int_{B(x_0,t)} |f(z)|dz\frac{dt}{t^{n+1}}
\\
&\lesssim \frac{1}{\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)} \int_{2r}^{\infty}
\left\|b(\cdot)-b_{B(x_0,t)}\right\|_{L^{\widetilde{\Phi}}(B)} \|f\|_{L^\Phi(B(x_0,t))}\frac{dt}{t^{n+1}}
\\
& \quad + \frac{1}{\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)} \int_{2r}^{\infty}|b_{B}-b_{B(x_0,t)}|
\|f\|_{L^\Phi(B(x_0,t))}\Phi^{-1}\big(t^{-n}\big)\frac{dt}{t}
\\
& \lesssim \frac{\|b\|_{*}}{\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)}
\int_{2r}^{\infty}\Big(1+\ln \frac{t}{r}\Big)
\|f\|_{L^\Phi(B(x_0,t))}\Phi^{-1}\big(t^{-n}\big)\frac{dt}{t}.\end{aligned}$$ Summing $\left\|A\right\|_{L^\Phi(B)}$ and $\left\|B\right\|_{L^\Phi(B)}$, we have $$\label{deckfV}
\|[b,G_{\alpha}]f_2\|_{L^\Phi(B)}
\lesssim \frac{\|b\|_{*}}{\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)}
\int_{2r}^{\infty}\Big(1+\ln \frac{t}{r}\Big) \|f\|_{L^\Phi(B(x_0,t))}\Phi^{-1}\big(t^{-n}\big)\frac{dt}{t}.$$ Finally, we obtain $$\begin{aligned}
\|[b,G_{\alpha}]f\|_{L^\Phi(B)} & \lesssim \|b\|_{*}\,\|f\|_{L^\Phi(2B)}
\\
& + \frac{\|b\|_{*}}{\Phi^{-1}\big(r^{-n}\big)} \int_{2r}^{\infty}\Big(1+\ln \frac{t}{r}\Big) \|f\|_{L^\Phi(B(x_0,t))}\Phi^{-1}\big(t^{-n}\big)\frac{dt}{t},\end{aligned}$$ and the statement of Lemma \[lem5.1.\] follows by .
\[3.4.XcomT\] Let $b\in BMO$, $\a\in(0,1]$, $\Phi$ be a Young function which is lower type $p_0$ and upper type $p_1$ with $1<p_0\le p_1<\i$ and $(\varphi_1,\varphi_2)$ and $\Phi$ satisfy the condition $$\label{eq3.6.VZfrMaxcom}
\int_{r}^{\i}\Big(1+\ln \frac{t}{r}\Big) \, \Big({\mathop{\rm ess \; inf}\limits}_{t<s<\i}\frac{\varphi_1(x,s)}{\Phi^{-1}\big(s^{-n}\big)}\Big) \, \Phi^{-1}\big(t^{-n}\big)\frac{dt}{t} \le C \, \varphi_2(x,r),$$ where $C$ does not depend on $x$ and $r$. Then the operator $[b,G_{\a}]$ is bounded from $M^{\Phi,\varphi_1}(\Rn)$ to $M^{\Phi,\varphi_2}(\Rn)$.
The statement of Theorem \[3.4.XcomT\] follows by Lemma \[lem5.1.\] and Theorem \[thm3.2.\] in the same manner as in the proof of Theorem \[thm4.4.\].
In [@Wilson1], the author proved that the functions $G_{\alpha}f$ and $g_{\alpha}f$ are pointwise comparable. Thus, as a consequence of Theorem \[thm4.4.\], we have the following result.
\[wucor1.6\] Let $b\in BMO$, $\a\in(0,1]$, $\Phi$ be a Young function which is lower type $p_0$ and upper type $p_1$ with $1<p_0\le p_1<\i$ and the functions $(\varphi_1,\varphi_2)$ and $\Phi$ satisfy the condition , then $[b,g_{\a}]$ is bounded from $M^{\Phi,\varphi_1}(\Rn)$ to $M^{\Phi,\varphi_2}(\Rn)$.
By using the the argument as similar as the above proofs and that of Theorem \[thm4.4.x\], we can also show the boundedness of $[b,g_{\lambda,\alpha}^{*}]$.
[99]{}
Bennett, C., Sharpley, R.: Interpolation of operators. Academic Press, Boston, 1988.
Calderon, A.P.: Commutators of singular integral operators. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. **53**, 1092-1099 (1965) .
Calderon, A.P.: Cauchy integrals on Lipschitz curves and related operators. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. **74**(4), 1324-1327 (1977).
Cianchi, A.: Strong and weak type inequalities for some classical operators in Orlicz spaces. J. London Math. Soc. **60**(2) no. 1, 187-202 (1999).
Coifman, R.R., Rochberg, R., Weiss,G.: Factorization theorems for Hardy spaces in several variables. Ann. of Math.(2) vol **103** no.3, 611-635 (1976).
Coifman, R., Lions, P., Meyer, Y., Semmes, S.: Compensated compactness and Hardy spaces. J. Math. Pures Appl.**72**, 247-286 (1993).
Deringoz, F., Guliyev, V.S., Samko, S.: Boundedness of maximal and singular operators on generalized Orlicz-Morrey spaces. accepted in Advances in Harmonic Analysis and Operator Theory, Series: Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, Vol. **235**, 1-24 (2014).
Guliyev, V.S.: Integral operators on function spaces on the homogeneous groups and on domains in $\Rn$. Doctor’s degree dissertation, Mat. Inst. Steklov, Moscow, 329 pp. (in Russian) (1994).
Guliyev, V.S.: Function spaces, Integral Operators and Two Weighted Inequalities on Homogeneous Groups. Some Applications. Casioglu, Baku, 332 pp. (in Russian) (1999).
Guliyev, V.S.: Boundedness of the maximal, potential and singular operators in the generalized Morrey spaces. J. Inequal. Appl. Art. ID 503948 (2009). 20 pp.
Guliyev, V.S., Aliyev, S.S., Karaman, T., Shukurov, P.S.: Boundedness of sublinear operators and commutators on generalized Morrey Space. Int. Eq. Op. Theory. **71** (3), 327-355 (2011).
Guliyev, V.S.: Generalized local Morrey spaces and fractional integral operators with rough kernel. J. Math. Sci. (N. Y.) vol. **193** No. 2, 211-227 (2013).
Guliyev, V.S.: Commutators of intrinsic square functions on generalized weighted Morrey spaces. submitted
Guliyev, V.S., Shukurov P.S.: Commutators of intrinsic square functions on generalized Morrey spaces. Proceedings of IMM of NAS of Azerbaijan. (in press).
V.S. Guliyev, F. Deringoz, On the Riesz potential and its commutators on generalized Orlicz-Morrey spaces. arXiv:1310.6604v1 \[math.FA\] , 24 October 2013, 1-20.
Guliyev, V.S., Deringoz, F., Hasanov, J. J.: $\Phi$-admissible singular operators and their commutators on vanishing generalized Orlicz-Morrey spaces. submitted
Hasanov, J. J.: $\Phi$-admissible sublinear singular operators and generalized Orlicz-Morrey spaces. attached in J. Funct. Spaces Appl, http://www.hindawi.com/journals/jfsa/aip/505237/.
Huang, J. Z., Liu, Y.: Some characterizations of weighted Hardy spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. **363**, 121-127 (2010).
Izuki, M., Sawano, Y.: Variable Lebesgue norm estimates for BMO functions. Czechoslovak Math. J. **62**(137), no. 3, 717–727 (2012).
Kita, H.: On maximal functions in Orlicz spaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. **124**, 3019-3025 (1996).
Kita, H.: On Hardy-Littlewood maximal functions in Orlicz spaces. Math. Nachr. **183**, 135-155 (1997).
Kokilashvili, V., Krbec, M. M.: Weighted Inequalities in Lorentz and Orlicz Spaces. World Scientific, Singapore, (1991).
Krasnoselskii, M.A., Rutickii, Ya. B.: Convex Functions and Orlicz Spaces. English translation P. Noordhoff Ltd., Groningen, (1961).
Liang, Y., Nakai, E., Yang, D., Zhang, J.: Boundedness of Intrinsic Littlewood-Paley Functions on Musielak-Orlicz Morrey and Campanato Spaces. Banach J. Math. Anal. **8** no. 1, 221-268 (2014).
Liu, P.D., Wang, M.F. : Weak Orlicz spaces: Some basic properties and their applications to harmonic analysis. Science China Mathematics **56** (4), 789-802 (2013).
Ky, L. D.: New Hardy spaces of Musielak-Orlicz type and boundedness of sublinear operators. arXiv: 1103.3757 \[math.CA\]
Morrey, C.B.: On the solutions of quasi-linear elliptic partial differential equations. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. [**43**]{}, 126-166 (1938).
Nakai, E.: Generalized fractional integrals on Orlicz-Morrey spaces. In: Banach and Function Spaces. (Kitakyushu, 2003), Yokohama Publishers, Yokohama, 323-333 (2004). Nakai, E.: Orlicz-Morrey spaces and the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function. Studia Math. **188** no. 3, 193-221 (2008).
Nakai, E.: Calderón-Zygmund operators on Orlicz-Morrey spaces and modular inequalities. Banach and function spaces II, Yokohama Publ, Yokohama, 393-410 (2008).
John F., Nirenberg L., On functions of bounded mean oscillation. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 1961, 14: 415-426.
Orlicz, W.: Über eine gewisse Klasse von Räumen vom Typus B. Bull. Acad. Polon. A, 207-220 (1932). ; reprinted in: Collected Papers, PWN, Warszawa, 217-230 (1988).
Orlicz, W.: Über Räume ($L^M$). Bull. Acad. Polon. A, 93-107 (1936). ; reprinted in: Collected Papers, PWN, Warszawa, 345-359 (1988).
Rao, M. M., Ren, Z. D.: Theory of Orlicz Spaces. M. Dekker, Inc., New York, (1991).
Sawano, Y., Sugano, S., Tanaka, H.: Orlicz-Morrey spaces and fractional operators. Potential Anal. **36** no. 4, 517-556 (2012).
Wang, H.: Intrinsic square functions on the weighted Morrey spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. **396**, 302-314 (2012).
Wang, H.: Boundedness of intrinsic square functions on the weighted weak Hardy spaces. Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory **75**, 135-149 (2013).
Wang, H., Liu, H. P.: Weak type estimates of intrinsic square functions on the weighted Hardy spaces. Arch. Math. **97**, 49-59 (2011).
Weiss, G.: A note on Orlicz spaces. Portugal Math. **15**, 35-47 (1956).
Wilson, M.: The intrinsic square function. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. **23**, 771-791 (2007).
Wilson, M.: Weighted Littlewood-Paley theory and Exponential-square integrability. Lecture Notes in Math. vol. **1924**, Springer-Verlag (2007).
[^1]: corresponding author: [email protected] (V.S. Guliyev)\
[$^{a}$ Department of Mathematics, Ahi Evran University, Kirsehir, Turkey]{}\
[$^{b}$ Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics, Baku, Azerbaijan]{} [*AMS Mathematics Subject Classification:*]{} $~~$ 42B20, 42B25, 42B35, 46E30\
[*Key words:*]{} generalized Orlicz-Morrey spaces; intrinsic square functions; commutator; BMO
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We investigate the nature of stellar populations of major galaxy mergers between late-type spirals considerably abundant in interstellar medium by performing numerical simulations designed to solve both the dynamical and chemical evolution in a self-consistent manner. We particularly consider that the star formation history of galaxy mergers is a crucial determinant for the nature of stellar populations of merger remnants, and therefore investigate how the difference in star formation history between galaxy mergers affects the chemical evolution of galaxy mergers. We found that the rapidity of star formation, which is defined as the ratio of the dynamical time-scale to the time-scale of gas consumption by star formation, is the most important determinant for a number of fundamental characteristics of stellar populations of merger remnants. Main results obtained in this study are the following five. (1) A galaxy merger with more rapid star formation becomes elliptical with larger mean metallicity. This is primarily because in the merger with more rapid star formation, a smaller amount of metal-enriched gas is tidally stripped away during merging and consequently a larger amount of the gas can be converted to stellar component. This result demonstrates that the origin of the color-magnitude relation of elliptical galaxies can be closely associated with the details of merging dynamics which depends on the rapidity of star formation in galaxy mergers. (2) Negative metallicity gradient fitted reasonably well by power-low can be reproduced by dissipative galaxy mergers with star formation. The magnitude of metallicity gradient is larger for an elliptical galaxy formed by galaxy merging with less rapid star formation. (3) Absolute magnitude of metallicity gradient correlates with that of age gradient in galaxy mergers in the sence that a merger remnant with steeper negative metallicity gradient is more likely to show steeper age gradient. (4) The outer part of stellar populations is both older and less metal-enriched than nuclei in an elliptical galaxy formed by galaxy merging with less rapid star formation. Moreover, the metallicity of the outer part of gaseous component for some models with less rapid star formation is appreciably smaller than that of stellar one. This result implies that the origin of metal-poor hot gaseous $X$-ray halo in real elliptical galaxies can be essentially ascribed to the dynamics of dissipative galaxy merging. (5) Irrespectively of the rapidity of star formation, the epoch of galaxy merging affects both the mean stellar metallicity and mean stellar age of merger remnants: Later galaxy mergers are more likely to become ellipticals with both younger and more metal-enriched stellar populations. This result reflects the fact that in the later mergers, a larger amount of more metal-enriched interstellar gas is preferentially converted into younger stars in the later star formation triggered by galaxy merging. These five results clearly demonstrate that even the chemical evolution of elliptical galaxies can be strongly affected by the details of dynamical evolution of galaxy merging, which is furthermore determined by the rapidity of star formation of galaxy mergers. In particular, tidal stripping of interstellar gas and total amount of gaseous dissipation during galaxy merging are demonstrated to play a vital role in determining a number of chemical properties of merger remnants. Based upon these results, we adopt a specific assumption of the luminosity dependence of the rapidity of star formation and thereby discuss how successfully the present merger model can reproduce a number of fundamental chemical, photometric, and spectroscopic characteristics of elliptical galaxies.'
author:
- 'Kenji Bekki & Yasuhiro Shioya'
title: 'Stellar populations in gas-rich galaxy mergers I. Dependence on star formation history'
---
Introduction
============
Elliptical galaxies have been generally considered to be old, coeval and homogeneous systems passively evolving after the single initial burst of star formation associated with dissipative galaxy formation. This classical picture of elliptical galaxy formation appears to have been supported by the considerably tight color-magnitude relation of elliptical galaxies ( Bower, Lucey, & Ellis 1992; Ellis et al. 1997) and by relatively smaller redshift evolution of photometric properties of elliptical galaxies (Arag$\rm \acute{o}$n-Salamanca et al. 1993; Franx & van Dokkum 1996). A growing number of recent observational results, however, shed a strong doubt on this long-standing view of elliptical galaxy formation, and suggest that there is great variety of star formation history between elliptical galaxies, such as the epoch of major star formation, the duration and efficiency of star formation (Worthey, Faber, & Gonzalez 1992; Matteuchi 1994; Faber et al. 1995; Bender 1996; Worthey, Trager, & Faber 1996). This tendency that elliptical galaxies show diversity in star formation history and nevertheless can actually keep the tightness of the color-magnitude relation is considered to be quite mysterious and thus to provide any theoretical models with a valuable insight on the elliptical galaxy formation. Such kind of mysterious nature observed in elliptical galaxies is demonstrated to hold equally for the dynamical and kinematical properties of elliptical galaxies. For example, considerably small thickness of the fundamental plane of elliptical galaxies implies a rather smaller range of admitted dynamical state of the galaxies (Djorgovski & Davis 1987; Dressler et al. 1987 ; Djorgovski, Pahre, & de Carvalho 1996) whereas the morphological dichotomy between boxy-disky elliptical galaxies (Kormendy & Bender 1996) and the projected density profile systematically departing from de Vaucouleurs $R^{1/4}$ law (Caon, Capaccioli, & D’Onofrio 1993) show a great variety of major orbit families consisting the galaxies. These fundamental characteristics that elliptical galaxies show both diversity and uniformity in their chemical, photometric and dynamical properties have imposed some stringent but valuable constraints on any theoretical models of elliptical galaxy formation. What is the most vital in challenging the origin of elliptical galaxy formation in this kind of situation is to investigate whether or not both the chemical and photometric properties and dynamical and kinematical ones can be reproduced successfully by a specific model of galaxy formation in a reasonably self-consistent manner. The previous theoretical models addressing this important issue on elliptical galaxy formation are divided basically into two categories: The dissipative galactic collapse model (e.g., Larson 1976; Carlberg 1984) and the galaxy merger model (e.g., Toomre & Toomre 1972). As is suggested by Kormendy & Sanders (1992), these two dominant and apparently competing scenarios for elliptical galaxy formation are now converging, thus it would be crucial to construct one more realistic and sophisticated model of elliptical galaxy formation. Although there are a large number of important studies exploring the origin of elliptical galaxy formation along the dissipative collapse scenario, especially in the context of the nature of stellar populations (e.g., Arimoto & Yoshii 1987), we here restrict ourselves to the merger scenario of elliptical galaxy formation.
Recent extensive studies of merger models of elliptical galaxy formation, mostly based upon numerical simulations, $appear$ to have succeeded in resolving most of the outstanding problems related to dynamical and kinematical properties of elliptical galaxies, such as the phase space density (Ostriker 1980; Carlberg 1986) and kinematical misalignment (Franx, Illingworth, & de Zeeuw 1991; Barnes 1992), by invoking the inclusion of bulge component, gaseous dissipation, and multiplicity of galaxy merging (Hernquist, Spergel, & Heyl 1993; Weil & Hernquist 1996; Barnes & Hernquist 1996). Although it would be safe to say that the galaxy merging between two late-type spirals is one of the most promising candidates explaining more clearly the origin of elliptical galaxies at least in the context of the $dynamical$ $and$ $kinematical$ $properties$, however, there still remain a number of unresolved and apparently serious problems concerning the merger model (e.g., van den Bergh 1995). One of the most crucial problems among these is on whether the fundamental characteristics of stellar populations of elliptical galaxies can be reproduced reasonably well by galaxy merging between two late-types spirals. Surprisingly, there are only a few works addressing this critical issue for the merger model, probably because it is considered to be rather difficult to solve the chemical evolution of galaxy mergers in which a number of competing physical processes are expected to affect strongly the chemical evolution of galaxy mergers. White (1980) and Mihos & Hernquist (1994) found that the stellar populations of progenitor disks are not mixed so well even by the violent relaxation during galaxy merging and consequently the metallicity gradient of progenitor disks is not so drastically washed out. The metallicity gradient of merger remnant is furthermore found not to be fitted by power law observed in elliptical galaxies (Mihos & Hernquist 1994). Schweizer & Seitzer (1992) discussed whether or not the bluer integrated $UBV$ color of elliptical galaxies with morphologically fine structure can be explained by secondary starburst induced by major disk-disk galaxy mergers. Kauffmann & Charlot (1997) construct a semi-analytic model of elliptical galaxy formation, which is based upon the hierarchical clustering in CDM universe and includes rather simple chemical enrichment process, and thereby demonstrate that the origin of the color-magnitude relation of elliptical galaxies can be reproduced successfully even in the CDM model of galaxy formation (See also Baugh, Cole & Frenk 1996.). Thus, since there are only a few works addressing chemical and photometric properties for the merger model, it is essential for the merger model to investigate more throughly the fundamental chemical and photometric properties of merger remnants, including the origin of color-magnitude relation (Faber 1973; Visvanathan & Sandage 1977), age and metallicity gradient (Peletier et al. 1990; Davies et al 1991), $\rm Mg_{2} - \sigma$ relation (Burstein et al. 1988), age-metal-conspiracy in stellar populations (Faber et al. 1995; Worthey et al. 1996), luminosity dependence of the line ratio \[Mg/Fe\] (Worthey et al. 1992), metal-poor gaseous $X$-ray halo (Matsumoto et al. 1997), and the substantially metal-enriched galactic nuclei at higher redshift (Hamann & Ferland 1993).
What should be recognized foremost in investigating the nature of stellar populations in merger remnants is that a glowing number of observational results have been accumulated which suggest the relatively earlier formation of elliptical galaxies. Tightness of the color-magnitude relation in the cluster of galaxies (Bower et al. 1992, Ellis et al 1996), relatively smaller photometric evolution of cluster ellipticals (Arag$\rm
\acute{o}$n-Salamanca et al. 1993), and the redshift evolution of the fundamental plane (Franx & van Dokkum 1996) all suggest the $typical$ formation epoch of elliptical galaxies is earlier than 2 in redshift. Furthermore, as is suggested by Kormendy & Sanders (1992), the fact that no galaxy in the $K$-band survey of Cowie et al. (1994) shows the global color resembling that of the Arp 220, which is considered to be ongoing mergers and forming ellipticals, implies that the formation epoch of elliptical galaxies should be earlier than 1.0 in redshift. Silva & Bothun (1997) revealed that the fraction of mass of stellar populations with intermediate age to total mass in elliptical galaxies with morphologically fine structure is less than 15 percent. These results imply that if elliptical galaxies are formed by galaxy merging, the epoch of galaxy merging should be relatively earlier and furthermore that the precursor disks of galaxy mergers may be extremely abundant in interstellar medium compared with the present spirals. Recent high quality imaging using $Hubble$ $Space$ $Telescope$ ($HST$) has revealed that a larger number of galaxies at faint magnitude are interacting/merging galaxies (e.g., van den Bergh et al. 1996), indicating furthermore that the potential candidate for elliptical galaxies formed by galaxy merging are ubiquitous in higher redshift universe. Hence it is quite reasonable and essential to study the nature of stellar populations of higher redshift galaxy mergers between disk galaxies with the gas mass fraction larger than 0.2, which is a typical value of the present late-type spirals, and thereby to confirm whether or not elliptical galaxies can be formed $actually$ by galaxy merging.
The purpose of this paper is to explore the nature of the stellar populations of a gas-rich disk merger which is considered to be occurred the most frequently in the high redshift universe. We particularly investigate how successfully galaxy mergers between gas-rich spirals can reproduce a number of fundamental chemical, photometric, and spectroscopic properties of elliptical galaxies. The layout of this paper is as follows. In §2, we summarize numerical models used in the present study and describe in detail methods for analyzing the stellar populations produced by dissipative galaxy mergers with star formation. In §3, we demonstrate how a number of fundamental characteristics of stellar populations in merger remnants are affected by the star formation history of dissipative galaxy merging. In §4, we discuss how successfully the present merger model can reproduce a number of observational results concerning the chemical, photometric, and spectroscopic properties of elliptical galaxies. In this section, we also point out the advantages and disadvantages of galaxy mergers in explaining both the chemical, photometric, and spectroscopic properties and dynamical and kinematical ones in real elliptical galaxies. The conclusions of the present study are given in §5.
Model
=====
Dynamical evolution of dissipative galaxy mergers with star formation is generally considered to be highly complex principally because only a smaller amount of interstellar gas can drastically change the degree of violent relaxation, the details of redistribution of angular momentum in gaseous and stellar component, and the total amount of mass transfered to the central region of merger remnants (Barnes & Hernquist 1992, 1996). Basically the transfer and mixing of heavy elements ejected from stellar component are controlled by the above dynamical processes of galaxy merging in a considerably complicated way, we accordingly could not be allowed simply to invoke the Simple one-zone model in analyzing the chemical and photometric evolution of merging galaxies. Thus, in order to analyze the nature of stellar populations produced in such a complex situation of dissipative galaxy merging, we must solve both dynamical and chemical evolution in a admittedly self-consistent manner. In the present study, dynamical evolution of collisional component (interstellar gas) and collisionless one (dark halo and stars) is solved by a specific N-body method and then a number of characteristics of stellar populations at given points in the merger remnants are calculated based on the derived information about the position, velocity, age, and metallicity of each stellar particle. Firstly we describe the numerical model including the initial conditions of the mergers, the prescriptions of dissipative process, and the model for star formation in §2.1. Secondly we give the method for analyzing the chemical enrichment process during mergers and the photometric properties of the remnants in §2.2. Thirdly, we describe the main points of analysis of the present study in §2.3. Lastly, we give values of each parameter in each model in §2.4.
Numerical model
---------------
### Initial conditions
We construct models of galaxy mergers between gas-rich disk galaxies with equal mass by using Fall-Efstathiou model (1980). The total mass and the size of a progenitor disk are $M_{\rm d}$ and $R_{\rm d}$, respectively. From now on, all the mass and length are measured in units of $M_{\rm d}$ and $R_{\rm d}$, respectively, unless specified. Velocity and time are measured in units of $v$ = $ (GM_{\rm d}/R_{\rm d})^{1/2}$ and $t_{\rm dyn}$ = $(R_{\rm d}^{3}/GM_{\rm d})^{1/2}$, respectively, where $G$ is the gravitational constant and assumed to be 1.0 in the present study. If we adopt $M_{\rm d}$ = 6.0 $\times$ $10^{10}$ $ \rm M_{\odot}$ and $R_{\rm d}$ = 17.5 kpc as a fiducial value, then $v$ = 1.21 $\times$ $10^{2}$ km/s and $t_{\rm dyn}$ = 1.41 $\times$ $10^{8}$ yr, respectively. In the present model, the rotation curve becomes nearly flat at 0.35 radius with the maximum rotational velocity $v_{\rm m}$ = 1.8 in our units. The corresponding total mass $M_{\rm t}$ and halo mass $M_{\rm h}$ are 3.8 and 2.8 in our units, respectively. The radial ($R$) and vertical ($Z$) density profile of a disk are assumed to be proportional to $\exp (R/R_{0}) $ with scale length $R_{0}$ = 0.2 and to ${\rm sech}^2 (Z/Z_{0})$ with scale length $Z_{0}$ = 0.04 in our units, respectively. The mass density of halo component is truncated at 1.2 in our units and its velocity dispersion at a given point is set to be isotropic and given according to the virial theorem. In addition to the rotational velocity made by the gravitational field of disk and halo component, the initial radial and azimuthal velocity dispersion are given to disk component according to the epicyclic theory with Toomre’s parameter ([@bt87]) $Q$ = 1.0. This adopted value for $Q$ parameter is appreciably smaller compared with the value required for stabilizing the initial disk against the non-axisymmetric dynamical instability (e.g. bar instability). The reason for this adoption is that the initial disk is assumed to be composed mostly of interstellar gas and thus random kinetic energy in the disk is considered to be rather smaller because of gaseous dissipation in the disk. The vertical velocity dispersion at given radius are set to be 0.5 times as large as the radial velocity dispersion at that point, as is consistent with the observed trend of the Milky Way (e.g., Wielen 1977). As is described above, the present initial disk model does not include any remarkable bulge component, and accordingly corresponds to ‘purely’ late-type spiral without galactic bulge. Although it is highly possible that galactic bulges greatly affect the chemical evolution of galaxy mergers, we however investigate this issue in our future papers. It could be reasonable to consider that the present initial disk with a considerably larger amount of interstellar gas and without pronounced galactic bulges is one of candidates of precursors of typical elliptical galaxies which are considered to be formed at relatively higher redshift ($z$ $>$ 2).
The collisional and dissipative nature of the interstellar medium is modeled by the sticky particle method ([@sch81]). It should be emphasized here that this discrete cloud model can at best represent the $real$ interstellar medium of galaxies in a schematic way. As is modeled by McKee & Ostriker (1977), the interstellar medium can be considered to be composed mainly of ‘hot’, ‘warm’, and ‘cool’ gas, each of which mutually interacts hydrodynamically in a rather complicated way. Actually, these considerably complicated nature of interstellar medium in disk galaxies would not be so simply modeled by the ‘sticky particle’ method in which gaseous dissipation is modeled by ad hoc cloud-cloud collision: Any existing numerical method probably could not model the $real$ interstellar medium in an admittedly proper way. In the present study, as a compromise, we only try to address some important aspects of hydrodynamical interaction between interstellar medium in disk galaxies and in dissipative mergers. More elaborated numerical modeling for real interstellar medium would be necessary for our further understanding of dynamical evolution in dissipative galaxy mergers. To mimic the galaxy mergers which are occurred at higher redshift and thus very dissipative because of a considerably larger amount of interstellar gas in the progenitor disks, we assume that the fraction of gas mass in a disk is set to be 1.0 initially. Actually, the gas mass fraction in precursor disks of a merger is different between galaxy mergers and depends on the epoch of the merging. Although this difference probably could yield a great variety of chemical and dynamical structures in merger remnants, we do not intend to consider this important difference for simplicity in the present paper and will address in our future paper. The size of the clouds is set to be 3.5 $\times$ $10^{-3}$ in our units in the present simulations. The radial and tangential restitution coefficient for cloud-cloud collisions are set to be 0.5 and 0.0, respectively. The number of particles of halo and the gaseous component for an above isolated galaxy are 5000 and 10000, respectively.
Numerical simulations of galaxy mergers are divided into two categories in the present study: Pair mergers between two disks with a parabolic encounter, and multiple mergers between five disks. In all of the simulations of pair mergers, the orbit of the two disks is set to be initially in the $xy$ plane and the distance between the center of mass of the two disks, represented by $r_{\rm in}$, is assumed to be the free parameter which controls the epoch of galaxy merging. The pericenter distance, represented by $r_{\rm p}$, is also assumed to be the free parameter which controls the initial total orbital angular momentum of galaxy mergers. The eccentricity is set to be 1.0 for all models of pair mergers, meaning that the encounter of galaxy merging is parabolic. The spin of each galaxy in a pair merger is specified by two angle $\theta_{i}$ and $\phi_{i}$, where suffix $i$ is used to identify each galaxy. $\theta_{i}$ is the angle between the $z$ axis and the vector of the angular momentum of a disk. $\phi_{i}$ is the azimuthal angle measured from $x$ axis to the projection of the angular momentum vector of a disk on to $xy$ plane. The value of each parameter, $\theta_{i}$, $\phi_{i}$, $r_{\rm p}$ and $r_{\rm in}$ for each model is described later. In the simulations of multiple mergers, the initial position of each progenitor disk is set to be distributed randomly within a sphere with radius 6.0 in our units, and the initial velocity dispersion of each disk (that is, the random motion of each galaxy in the sphere) is set to be distributed in such a way that the ratio of the total kinematical energy to the total potential energy in the system is 0.25. The time when the progenitor disks merge completely and reach the dynamical equilibrium is less than 15.0 in our units for most of models and does not depend so strongly on the history of star formation in the present calculations.
### Global star formation
Star formation is modeled by converting the collisional gas particles into collisionless new stellar particles according to the algorithm of star formation described below. We adopt the Schmidt law (Schmidt 1959) with exponent $\gamma$ = 2.0 (1.0 $ < $ $\gamma$ $ < $ 2.0, [@ken89]) as the controlling parameter of the rate of star formation. The amount of gas consumed by star formation for each gas particle in each time step, $\dot{M_{\rm g}}$, is given as: $$\dot{M_{\rm g}} \propto C_{\rm SF} \times
{(\rho_{\rm g}/{\rho_{0}})}^{\gamma - 1.0}$$ where $\rho_{\rm g}$ and $\rho_{0}$ are the gas density around each gas particle and the mean gas density at 0.48 radius of an initial disk, respectively. This star formation model is similar to that of Mihos, Richstone, & Bothun (1992). In order to avoid a large number of new stellar particles with different mass, we convert one gas particle into one stellar one according to the following procedure. First we give each gas particle the probability, $P_{\rm sf}$, that the gas particle is converted into stellar one, by setting the $P_{\rm sf}$ to be proportional to the $\dot{M_{\rm g}}$ in equation (1) estimated for the gas particle. Then we draw the random number to determine whether or not the gas particle is totally converted into one new star. This method of star formation enables us to control the rapidity of star formation without increase of particle number in each simulation thus to maintain the numerical accuracy in each simulation. The $C_{\rm SF}$ in the equation (1) is the parameter that controls the rapidity of gas consumption by star formation: The larger the $C_{\rm SF}$ is, the more rapidly the gas particles are converted to new stellar particles. As a result of this, total amount of gaseous dissipation is also controlled by this parameter $C_{\rm SF}$: The more amount of kinetic energy of gas particles is dissipated away by cloud-cloud collision for the models with smaller $C_{\rm SF}$. This parameter $C_{\rm SF}$ is meant to be proportional to the ratio of dynamical time-scale of the system to the time-scale of gas consumption by star formation. Furthermore the equation (1) states that a larger number of stellar particles are created at the regions where the local gas density become larger owing to the onset of local Jeans instability. The positions and velocity of the new stellar particles are set to be the same as those of original gas particles. As is described above, in the present study, we do not explicitly include the ‘threshold density’ of star formation, which is demonstrated to be associated with the growth of local gravitational instability with relatively smaller wavelength, that is, the Toomre’s $Q$ parameter (Kennicutt 1989), for isolated disk galaxies. This is because the threshold criterion, which is derived only for calmly evolving galactic disks, would not so simply be applied to the present merger model, in which the time-scale that the disk can evolve without strong dynamical perturbation is relatively smaller (less than 10 dynamical time for typical models).
In the present study, we do not intend to include any ‘feedback effects’ of star formation such as thermal and dynamical heating of interstellar medium driven by supernovae, firstly because such inclusion could prevent us from deducing more clearly the important roles of the rapidity of star formation and secondly because there still remains a great uncertainty concerning the numerical implementation of the ‘feedback effects’ (Katz 1992; Navarro & White 1993). Accordingly, as is described above, the ‘star formation’ in this preliminary study only means the formation of collisionless particles and does not literally mean the actual and realistic series of star formation. This kind of modeling for star formation is rather oversimplified so that we can only address some important aspects of the roles of star formation in generating chemical and dynamical characteristics of merger remnants. However, we believe that since the main points of the present study are only the relatively global and average characteristics of chemical and photometric properties, even the rather simple model adopted in this study makes it possible to grasp some essential ingredients of the roles of ‘star formation’ in producing a number of important characteristics of stellar populations in merging galaxies. More extensive studies on this subject will be done in our future papers by using more elaborated model for star formation.
All the calculations related to the above dynamical evolution including the dissipative dynamics, star formation, and gravitational interaction between collisionless and collisional component have been carried out on the GRAPE board ([@sug90]) at Astronomical Institute of Tohoku University. The parameter of gravitational softening is set to be fixed at 0.04 in all the simulations. The time integration of the equation of motion is performed by using 2-order leap-flog method. Energy and angular momentum are conserved within 1 percent accuracy in a test collisionless merger simulation. Most of the calculations are set to be stopped at T = 25.0 in our units unless specified.
Method for analysis of stellar population
-----------------------------------------
Chemical and photometric properties such as global colors and metallicity gradient in elliptical galaxies depend critically on how the metallicity and age of stellar component are distributed in the galaxies. Accordingly, we first analyze the distribution of stellar age and that of stellar metallicity in merger remnant for each model in order to grasp the characteristics of stellar population in merger remnants. In the present study, these age and metallicity distribution are calculated based on the age and metallicity assigned to each stellar particle, as described in detail later. The outline for this calculation is as follows. First we derive the distribution of stellar age and that of stellar metallicity by assigning age and metallicity to stellar particles according as the law of chemical enrichment applied to this study. Next, by using the stellar population synthesis method, we calculate the photometric and spectroscopic properties based on the derived distribution of age and metallicity in merger remnant.
### Chemical enrichment
Chemical enrichment through star formation during galaxy merging is assumed to proceed both locally and instantaneously in the present study. The model for analyzing metal enrichment of each gas and stellar particle is as follows. First, as soon as a gas particle is converted into a new stellar one by star formation, we search neighbor gas particles locating within $R_{\rm che}$ from the position of the new stellar particle and then count the number of the neighbor gas particles, $N_{\rm gas}$. This $R_{\rm che}$ is referred to as chemical mixing length in the present paper, and represents the region within which the neighbor gas particles are polluted by metals ejected from the new stellar particle. The value of $R_{\rm che}$ relative to the typical size of a galaxy could be different between galaxies, accordingly the value of $R_{\rm che}$ is considered to be free parameter in the present study. The values of $R_{\rm che}$ examined the most extensively in the present study are 0.4, which is slightly smaller than the effective radius of typical merger remnants in the present study, 0.1, and 0.02, which is the half of the gravitational softening length. Next we assign the metallicity of original gas particle to the new stellar particle and increase the metals of the each neighbor gas particle according to the following equation about the chemical enrichment: $$\Delta M_{\rm Z} = \{ Z_{i}R_{\rm met}m_{\rm s}+(1.0-R_{\rm met})
(1.0-Z_{i})m_{\rm s}y_{\rm met} \}/N_{\rm gas}$$ where the $\Delta M_{\rm Z}$ represents the increase of metal for each gas particle. $ Z_{i}$, $R_{\rm met}$, $m_{\rm s}$, and $y_{\rm met}$ in the above equation represent the metallicity of the new stellar particle (or that of original gas particle), the fraction of gas returned to interstellar medium, the mass of the new star, and the chemical yield, respectively. The value of the $R_{\rm met}$ and that of $y_{\rm met}$ are set to be 0.3 and 0.03, respectively. Furthermore, the time, $t_{i}$, when the new stellar particle is created, is assigned to the new stellar particle in order to calculate the photometric evolution of merger remnants, as is described later. To verify the accuracy of the above treatment (including numerical code) for chemical enrichment process, we checked whether or not the following conservation law of chemical enrichment is satisfied for each time step in each test simulation: $$\sum_{\rm star} m_{\rm s}Z_{i} + \sum_{\rm gas}
m_{\rm g}Z_{i} = y_{\rm met}
\sum_{\rm star} m_{\rm s}$$ where $ m_{\rm g}$, $ m_{\rm s}$, and $ Z_{i}$ are the mass of each gas particle, that of each stellar one, and the metallicity of each particle, respectively, and the summation ($\sum$) is done for all the gas particles or stellar ones. Strictly speaking, the above equation holds when the value of $R_{\rm met}$ is 0.0. Thus, in testing the validity of the present code of chemical enrichment, we set the value of $R_{\rm met}$ to be 0.0 and then perform a simulation for the test. We confirmed that the above equation is nearly exactly satisfied in our test simulations and furthermore that even if the $R_{\rm met}$ is not 0.0, the difference in the value of total metallicity between the left and right side in the above equation is negligibly small.
### Population synthesis
It is assumed in the present study that the spectral energy distribution (SED) of a model galaxy is a sum of the SED of stellar particles. The SED of each stellar particle is assumed to be a simple stellar population (SSP) that is a coeval and chemically homogeneous assembly of stars. Thus the monochromatic flux of a galaxy with age $T$, $F_{\lambda}(T)$, is described as $$F_{\lambda}(T) = \sum_{\rm star} F_{{\rm SSP},\lambda}(Z_{i},
{\tau}_{i}) \times m_{\rm s} \; ,$$ where $F_{{\rm SSP},\lambda}(Z_{i},{\tau}_{i})$ and $m_{\rm s}$ are a monochromatic flux of SSP of age ${\tau}_{i}$ and metallicity $Z_{i}$, where suffix $i$ identifies each stellar particle, and mass of each stellar particle, respectively. The age of SSP, ${\tau}_{i}$, is defined as ${\tau}_{i} = T - t_{i}$, where $t_{i}$ is the time when a gas particle convert to a stellar one. The metallicity of SSP is exactly the same as that of the stellar particle, $Z_{i}$, and the summation ($\sum$) in equation (4) is done for all stellar particles in a model galaxy.
A stellar particle is assumed to be composed of stars whose age and metallicity are exactly the same as those of the stellar particle and the total mass of the stars is set to be the same as that of the stellar particle. Thus the monochromatic flux of SSP at a given wavelength is defined as $$F_{{\rm SSP}, \lambda}(Z_{i},{\tau}_{i}) = \int_{M_L}^{M_U}
\phi (M) f_{\lambda}(M, {\tau}_{i}, Z_{i}) dM \; ,$$ where $M$ is mass of a star, $f_{\lambda}(M, {\tau}_{i}, Z_{i})$ is a monochromatic flux of a star with mass $M$, metallicity $Z_{i}$ and age ${\tau}_{i}$. $\phi (M)$ is a initial mass function (IMF) of stars and $M_U$, $M_L$ are upper and lower mass limit of IMF, respectively.
In this paper, we use the $F_{{\rm SSP}, \lambda}(Z_{i}, {\tau}_{i})$ calculated by Tantalo et al. (1996). The characteristics of Tantalo et al. (1996)’s SSP are (1) all evolutionary phase, from the main sequence to the white dwarf or C-ignition stage, are included and (2) metallicity, $Z$, ranges from 0.0004 to 0.1 and helium content, $Y$, satisfies the relation, $Y=2.5Z + 0.230$. The library of stellar spectra calculated by Kurucz (1992) and the following form of the Salpeter IMF are used in deriving the above $F_{{\rm SSP}, \lambda}(Z_{i}, {\tau}_{i})$: $$\phi(M) =
\frac{(x-2)M_L^{x-2}}{1 - \left( \frac{M_L}{M_U} \right)^{x-2}} M^{-x} \; ,$$ where $x = 2.35$, $M_L = 0.15 M_{\odot}$ and $M_U = 120 M_{\odot}$. In order to estimate the $F_{\rm SSP} (Z_{i}, {\tau}_{i})$ for stellar particles with arbitrary $Z_{i}$ and ${\tau}_{i}$, we assign interpolated values to each stellar particle by using a set of data points tabulated in Table 2 of Tantalo et al. (1996). The mean stellar metallicity $< Z_* >$ used in the present study is defined as $$\begin{aligned}
<Z_*> & = &
\frac{\displaystyle \sum_{\rm star} Z_{i} m_{\rm s}}
{\displaystyle \sum_{\rm star} m_{\rm s}} \; .
%<Z_{\rm *,lum}> & = &
%\displaystyle \frac
%{\displaystyle \sum_{\rm star}
%F_{{\rm SSP},B}(Z_{i}, \tau_{i}) Z_{i} m_{\rm s}}
%{\displaystyle \sum_{\rm star}
%F_{{\rm SSP},B}(Z_{i}, \tau_{i}) m_{\rm s}} \; .\end{aligned}$$ Colors at given radius and radial color gradients are given as follows. First we divide the region ranging from 0.5 $R_{\em e}$ to 5.0 $R_{\em e}$ of a merger remnant into 20 annulus whose inner and outer boundary are located at the distance $r_{j}$ and $r_{j+1}$ from the center of the remnant, respectively. Then the monochromatic flux emitted from the $j$th annulus is derived by summing the $F_{\rm SSP} (Z_{i}, {\tau}_{i})$ of all the particles locating at $r_{j}$ $<$ $R_{i}$ $<$ $r_{j+1}$, where $R_{i}$ is the distance between the position of each stellar particle and the center of the remnant. Color gradients are calculated by using this monochromatic flux for each annulus.
Main points of analysis
-----------------------
We consider that the $C_{\rm SF}$ is the most important parameter in the present study, principally because the $C_{\rm SF}$ could depend on galactic luminosity. The importance of the $C_{\rm SF}$ and its possible dependence on galactic luminosity are described in the Appendix section. In what follows, we mainly investigate how the rapidity of gas consumption by star formation ($C_{\rm SF}$) can determine a number of fundamental chemical, photometric, and spectroscopic properties of merger remnants, and thereby observe how successfully the present merger model can reproduce the fundamental characteristics of real elliptical galaxies. Since the $C_{\rm SF}$ is considered to depend on galactic luminosity in the present study, this investigation corresponds to addressing indirectly the origin of the luminosity-dependent characteristics of elliptical galaxies. First we investigate the dependence of chemical properties on the $C_{\rm SF}$, which is the most important parameter in the present study, in §3.1. What we investigate the most extensively in this investigation are on the mean stellar and gaseous metallicity, radial gradients of metallicity and age, shapes of isochrome contour, and the formation of substantially metal-enriched galactic nuclei, in merger remnants. Second we investigate the important roles of other four parameters, the chemical mixing length, orbit configuration of galaxy merging, multiplicity of galaxy merging, and the epoch of galaxy merging, in determining the fundamental chemical properties of merger remnants (§3.2). This sort of multi-parameter study is indispensable for the present study, in which initial physical conditions of galaxy mergers can be variously different. In this investigation, we confirm whether or not the important roles of the parameter $C_{\rm SF}$ derived in §3.1 can be equally seen in the models with different chemical mixing length, orbit configuration, multiplicity of mergers, and merging epoch. We also observe how these four parameters modify the $C_{\rm SF}$ dependence derived in §3.2 and what fundamental roles the four parameters play in determining the characteristics of stellar populations. Third we investigate the photometric and spectroscopic properties of merger remnants and their dependence on the galactic luminosity, by adopting a specific relation between the $C_{\rm SF}$ and galactic luminosity and by assigning the mass and scale to each model with $C_{\rm SF}$, in §3.3.
Parameter values of each model
------------------------------
In the present paper, totally 29 models are investigated, and the parameters and brief summary of the results are given in Table 1. Each model of galaxy merger is labeled, for example, as Model B1, according to the orbit configuration of galaxy merging and multiplicity of the merging. Most of models (23 models) are assigned to pair mergers in Model B (standard models), C, D, E, and F and only two are assigned to multiple mergers in Model G. For comparison, the isolated evolution of a progenitor disk of a galaxy merger is also investigated and labeled as Model A. The values of orbit parameters, $\theta_{1}$ $\theta_{2}$, $\phi_{1}$, and $\phi_{2}$ are set to be 30.0, 120.0, 90.0, and 0.0, respectively, for Model B and F, 0.0, 120.0, 0.0, and 0.0 for Model C, 0.0, 30.0, 0.0, and 0.0 for Model D, 150.0, 150.0, 0.0, and 0.0 for Model E. Orbit configuration of Model D and that of Model E correspond to nearly prograde merger and nearly retrograde one, respectively. The Model F with $r_{\rm p}$ = 0.5 corresponds to the galaxy merger with smaller initial orbital angular momentum. The difference between the Model A1 (2) and Model A3 (4) is that in the Model A3 (4), chemical evolution including star formation is solved but dynamical evolution is $not$. Accordingly, structural and kinematical properties of the disk are set to be the same between the initial state and final one in the models, Model A3 and A4.
First, second and third column in the Table 1 denote the model number, value of the parameter $C_{\rm SF}$, and that of $R_{\rm che}$, respectively, for each model. The values of $r_{\rm in}$ and $r_{\rm p}$ are given in the fourth and fifth column, respectively. We give the mean gaseous metallicity ($<Z>$), the mean stellar metallicity ($<Z_{\ast}>$), the gas mass fraction $f_{\rm g}$ in the sixth, seventh, and eighth column, respectively. The values of the mean gaseous ($<Z_{\rm Sim}>$) and stellar ($<Z_{\ast ,\rm Sim}>$) metallicity predicted from the Simple one-zone model are presented in the ninth and tenth column, respectively. The mean epoch of star formation ($<T_{\ast}>$), which is defined as the average of star formation epoch ($t_{ i}$) for all stellar particles in a merger remnant at final state ($T=15$ in our units), is given in the eleventh column. $T_{M_{\ast}/M = 0.6}$ shown in the twelves column represents the time-scale (in our units) that 60 percent of initial gas of progenitor disk galaxies has been converted into stellar particles during a simulation. The thirteenth column gives the magnitude of metallicity gradient which is defined as $\Delta \log <Z_{\ast}> / \Delta \log R$ ($R$ is the distance from the center of merger remnant.) and measured for the region ranging from $0.5 R_{\rm eff}$ to $5.0 R_{\rm eff}$ ($R_{\rm eff}$ is the effective radius of each model.) in the $xy$ projection for each model.
Results
=======
In this section, we observe how the star formation history, in particular, the rapidity of star formation, in galaxy mergers can affect the fundamental characteristics of stellar populations in mergers remnants. Before describing the results of merger remnants, we begin to briefly observe the dynamical evolution of an isolated disk galaxy with star formation, which is considered to be a progenitor of a galaxy merger in the present study, and the dependence of star formation history on the parameter $C_{\rm SF}$ in galaxy mergers. Figure 1 gives snapshots of an isolated disk model with $C_{\rm SF}$ = 0.35 (Model A1) at $T$ = 15.0, in which about 60 percent of initial gas mass is converted into stellar component within 6.5 dynamical time. In the present isolated disk model, a stellar bar sufficiently develops in the central region of the disk only after more than 60 percent of initial gas mass has been consumed by star formation in the disk. The developed stellar bar is found to possess exponential density profile along the major axis of the stellar bar which is the so-called ‘exponential bar’ (See [@el96] for a recent review.). The initial disk is found to be heated dynamically in the vertical direction of the disk within 15 dynamical time owing to the dynamical interaction between the background stars, the small gaseous clumps, and the developed stellar bar. Accordingly, the present merger model describes the galaxy mergers between disk galaxies that $could$ be identified with late-type barred galaxies $if$ galaxy merging had not been occurred. Figure 2 is the time evolution of star formation rate, $f_g$, for each merger model, Model B1 and B5. As is indicated in this figure, the star formation during galaxy merging proceeds in such a way that the interstellar gas is consumed by star formation more rapidly for the model with larger $C_{\rm SF}$. This trend of star formation holds for other model sequences Model B $\sim$ G. The $C_{\rm SF}$ dependence of morphology and dynamical structure in merger remnants is briefly summarized in the Appendix section, which can help to understand more deeply the present numerical results. By using these models of galaxy mergers, we mainly present the $C_{\rm SF}$ dependence of mean stellar and gaseous metallicity, radial gradients of age and metallicity, and the shapes of isophotes and isochromes, in the following subsections.
Dependence of the chemical properties on the rapidity of star formation
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chemical, photometric, and spectroscopic properties of galaxies depend basically on how the metallicity and age of stellar populations of galaxies are distributed. Thus, we begin to observe the distribution of metallicity ($Z_{\ast}$) and the epoch of star formation ($T_{\ast}$) in the stellar component of merger remnants and its dependence on $C_{\rm SF}$. In this subsection §3.1, we present the following three results: (1) Dependence of $Z_{\ast} - T_{\ast}$ distribution on $C_{\rm SF}$, (2) Dependence of mean $Z_{\ast}$ on $C_{\rm SF}$ and its physical reason, and (3) The difference in the metallicity distribution of merger remnants between the Simple one-zone model and the present chemodynamical one.
### Distribution of stellar populations
First we describe the results concerning the dependence of $Z_{\ast} - T_{\ast}$ distribution on $C_{\rm SF}$. Figure 3 shows the distribution of stellar populations on the $Z_{\ast} - T_{\ast}$ map for model with $C_{\rm SF}$ = 0.35 and for 3.5, respectively. The meaning of the $T_{\ast}$ is that the stellar component with smaller $T_{\ast}$ is born earlier thus $older$. The vertical hight in each bin of $Z_{\ast}$ and $T_{\ast}$ denotes the number of star particles with $Z_{\ast}$ and $T_{\ast}$. In this figure, we can observe that there is an appreciable scatter in the metallicity for a fixed $T_{\ast}$. This scatter of metallicity for a given $T_{\ast}$ is one of the characteristics of chemical evolution of galaxies in which chemical components produced by star formation are less efficiently and less widely mixed into the whole region of galaxies, as has been already pointed out by Steinmetz & Müller (1994) for dissipatively collapsing galaxies. $Z_{\ast}- T_{\ast}$ distribution in the model with $C_{\rm SF}$ = 3.5 is shifted toward the larger $Z_{\ast}$ and smaller $T_{\ast}$ (older in age) than in the model with $C_{\rm SF}$ = 0.35, meaning that a larger amount of metal-enriched stars are produced more rapidly in the merger with rapid star formation than in that with gradual one. Spread in $T_{\ast}$ for a fixed $Z_{\ast}$ is more likely to be larger in the model with $C_{\rm SF}$ = 0.35 than in that $C_{\rm SF}$ = 3.5 whereas $Z_{\ast} - T_{\ast}$ distribution is more strongly peaked in the model with $C_{\rm SF}$ = 3.5 than in that $C_{\rm SF}$ = 0.35. These results imply that in the model with $C_{\rm SF}$ = 0.35, star formation proceeds less rapidly and more gradually, resulting in a smaller amount of metal-enriched stellar populations and a larger amount of younger stellar populations. This tendency of stellar populations plays an important role in determining the mean metallicity and age, and thus the photometric and spectroscopic evolution of merger remnants, as is described later.
Second, we observe how the mean stellar metallicity depends on the rapidity of star formation and explain the origin of the dependence. As is shown in Figure 4, which describes the time evolution of mean stellar metallicity ($<Z_*>$) of each merger remnant, the chemical enrichment proceeds faster and more efficiently in the model with larger $C_{\rm SF}$ than the model with smaller $C_{\rm SF}$, and thus the final value of $<Z_*>$ is larger in the model with larger $C_{\rm SF}$ than the model with smaller $C_{\rm SF}$: The time when $<Z_*>$ exceeds 0.015 is $T=0.7$ for the model with $C_{SF}=3.5$ and $T=5.0$ for the model with $C_{SF}=0.35$, and the asymptotic value of $<Z_*>$ (the value at $T$ = 15.0 in our units) is 0.0237 for the model with $C_{SF}=3.5$ and 0.0185 for the model with $C_{SF}=0.35$. This result clearly demonstrates that in dissipative galaxy mergers with star formation, the rapidity of star formation is an important factor even for determining the global and average chemical properties of merger remnants. The physical reason for this dependence can be explained as follows. For a galaxy merger with more rapid star formation, less amount of interstellar gas is tidally stripped away from the system during galaxy merging principally because more amount of initial gas has been already converted to stellar component before the system suffers more severely from violently varying gravitational potential of galaxy merging. As a result of this, more amount of the gas is consequently metal-enriched to a larger extent and converted into stellar component during merging. Thus, more amount of metals is shared by stellar component in the remnant of the galaxy merger with more rapid star formation. Moreover this observed tendency of the $C_{SF}$ dependence of mean stellar metallicity is found to be applied to the five standard models (See the seventh column in the Table 1 for Model B1 $\sim$ B5.). These results provide a potential success of reproducing qualitatively the mass-metallicity relation of elliptical galaxies: If the value of the $C_{SF}$ is larger for more luminous galaxy merger, then the derived result indicates that galaxy mergers between more luminous spirals are more likely to become ellipticals with larger stellar metallicity. This furthermore suggests that even the origin of fundamental photometric and spectroscopic properties such as the color-magnitude relation in elliptical galaxies are closely associated with the details of galactic dynamics.
In order to observe more clearly the above strong dynamical coupling between dynamical evolution and chemical one, we perform a set of comparative simulations in which chemical evolution (including star formation) is solved but the dynamical one (gravitational and dissipative dynamics) is not for an isolated galactic disk (Model A3 and A4). Accordingly, the density distribution and kinematical properties in the disk are fixed during the simulations. Since the time evolution of the gas mass fraction is the most fundamental determinant for the mean stellar metallicity in galaxies, by investigating the effects of galactic dynamics on the time evolution of gas mass fraction and the final gas mass fraction, we observe how the dynamical evolution can affect the chemical one in the present merger model. Figure 5 gives the time evolution of gas mass fraction, $f_{\rm g}$, for isolated disks $without$ $dynamical$ $evolution$ (Model A3 and A4) and for mergers (Model B1 and B5). As is shown in the lower panel of this Figure 5, the gas mass fraction at $T = 15.0$ is not so different between models with different $C_{\rm SF}$ for isolated disks without dynamical evolution (Model A3 and A4) whereas significant difference in the final gas mass fraction can be seen for mergers (Model B1 and B5). This result clearly indicates that dynamical evolution itself greatly strengthens the difference of final gas mass fraction between merger models with different $C_{\rm SF}$. Therefore the chemical evolution in galaxy mergers is demonstrated to be greatly affected by the dynamical evolution of galaxy merging. In the merger model (Model B1 and B5), as is described before, the total amount of interstellar gas tidally stripped away from the system is determined by the rapidity of star formation ($C_{\rm SF}$), accordingly the final gas mass fraction is strongly affected by the rapidity of star formation. This sort of importance of the rapidity of star formation ($C_{\rm SF}$) in controlling the final gas mass fraction can be seen even in the isolated disk models (Model A1 and A2), and can be explained as follows (See the upper panel of the Figure 5.). In the model with smaller $C_{\rm SF}$, non-axisymmetric structures such as spiral arms and bars developed in the star-forming disk can redistribute the mass and angular momentum of the remaining gaseous component more efficiently and for a longer times principally because a larger amount of gas has not been yet converted into stellar component. Consequently, a larger amount of the gas is transported outwardly in the disk and thus the mean gas density there is greatly dropped off. As a result of this, only a smaller fraction of the outwardly transported gas can be further converted into stellar component, and thus the mean stellar metallicity is smaller for the model with smaller $C_{\rm SF}$. This result clearly shows that the redistribution of mass and angular momentum driven by specific non-axisymmetric structures plays an important role in determining the final gas mass fraction in isolated disks. Thus, although the dynamical mechanisms operating to yield the difference in the final gas mass fraction between models with different rapidity of star formation is significantly different between isolated disks (Model A1 and A2) and mergers (Model B1 and B5), however these results say essentially the same thing: Chemical evolution of galaxies can be greatly affected by mass and angular momentum redistribution driven by global dynamical process such as the violent relaxation of galaxy merging and mass-transfer triggered by non-axisymmetric gravitational potential of galaxies. This sort of strong coupling between dynamical evolution and chemical one is first demonstrated by the present work and Bekki & Shioya (1997c).
Third, we observe the difference in chemical evolution of merging galaxies between the Simple one-zone model and the present chemodynamical one. Figure 6 describes the metallicity distribution of stellar component for the model with $C_{\rm SF}$ = 0.35 and for 3.5, on each of which the metallicity distribution predicted from the Simple model is superimposed. In estimating the distribution of stellar metallicity expected from the Simple model for each model, we use the time evolution of gas mass fraction obtained for each merger model (Model B1 and B5), and then calculate the metallicity distribution according to the standard formulation on the relation between gas mass fraction and mean stellar metallicity for the Simple model. Since the Simple model assumes both instantaneous recycling and instantaneous mixing, the Simple model corresponds to the present chemodynamical model with $R_{\rm che}$ equal to infinity. We also give the values of mean stellar and gaseous metallicity expected from the Simple model in the ninth and tenth column of the Table 1, by adopting the following formulation: $$\begin{aligned}
<Z_{\ast}> & = &
y_{\rm met} \left( 1 + \frac{f_g \ln f_g}{1 - f_g} \right) \; \; \; ,\\
Z_{\rm gas} & = &
- y_{\rm met} \ln f_g \; \; \; .\end{aligned}$$
As is shown in Figure 6, the metallicity distribution of the model with larger $C_{\rm SF}$ is shifted to righter side than the model with smaller $C_{\rm SF}$, which is consistent with the already obtained trend that the mean stellar metallicity of merger remnants with larger $C_{\rm SF}$ is larger than that of the remnants with smaller $C_{\rm SF}$. Furthermore, it is found that irrespectively of the values of $C_{\rm SF}$, the metallicity distribution is shifted to the righter direction in the chemodynamical model than in the Simple one and thus that the spread of the distribution is larger in the chemodynamical model. This larger spread results from the fact that in the present chemodynamical model, the chemical enrichment proceeds preferentially in the gaseous region with higher density where a larger amount of chemically enriched gas is converted into new and more metal-enriched stars. The magnitude of the difference of the distribution is found to be more likely to be larger for models with smaller $C_{\rm SF}$. This result clearly explains the reason why the difference in the mean stellar metallicity between the models with different values of $C_{\rm SF}$ for the present chemodynamical model is smaller than expected from the Simple model (See the sixth, seventh, ninth, and tenth column in the Table 1.). Gaseous metallicity, on the other hand, is found to be smaller in the chemodynamical model compared with that expected from the Simple model and not to depend on the values of $C_{\rm SF}$. These differences in the metallicity distribution between the Simple model and chemodynamical one results in the difference between these model in the photometric and spectroscopic properties of merger remnants, as is described in detail later.
Thus we demonstrate that dynamical evolution of galaxy merging greatly affects the chemical evolution in galaxy mergers, and consequently the chemical evolution in mergers is significantly different from that expected from the Simple one-zone model. What is particularly important in the present study is that the tidal stripping of interstellar gas during galaxy merging play a vital role in determining even the global chemical properties of merger remnants. This tidal stripping of interstellar gas is probably more important in galaxy mergers with a larger amount of interstellar gas, for example, in the mergers at higher redshift or in the mergers between less luminous spirals.
### Radial gradient of stellar populations
Here, we first observe how successfully the observed profile of radial metallicity gradient of elliptical galaxies can be reproduced in merger remnants and how the rapidity of star formation controls the absolute magnitude of the gradient. Observational studies have revealed that the radial metallicity gradient of elliptical galaxies can be fitted reasonably well by the power-low profile and that the magnitude of the gradients, $\Delta \log Z_{\ast}/\Delta \log R$, are -0.2 on average (Peletier et al. 1990; Davies et al. 1991). Mihos & Hernquist (1994) found that the collisionless galaxy mergers between spirals with exponential profile of metallicity gradient become ellipticals with the metallicity gradient profile appreciably deviating from power-low profile, implying that the later mergers with less amount of gaseous dissipation can not reproduce the observed gradient with power-low profiles. Figure 7 gives the radial distribution of stellar and gaseous metallicity for the present merger model with star formation and gaseous dissipation. As is shown in this figure, negative metallicity gradient fitted by power-low profile is reproduced reasonably well for model with $C_{\rm SF}$ = 0.35 and 3.5, which indicates that the origin of the metallicity gradients of elliptical galaxies are closely associated with dissipative galaxy merging with star formation. A merger remnant in the model with $C_{\rm SF} = 0.35$ has larger stellar metallicity in the central part and smaller metallicity in the outer part than the remnant in the model with $C_{\rm SF} = 3.5$, meaning that the metallicity gradient is larger for the model with less rapid star formation. The qualitative explanation for this trend of metallicity gradients can be given as follows. In the model with smaller $C_{\rm SF}$, a larger amount of metal enriched gas can be transferred to the inner region of the remnant owing to less rapid star formation and more amount of gaseous dissipation. In the outer part of the merger with smaller $C_{\rm SF}$, star formation is less likely to proceed efficiently and thus less likely to form metal-enriched stars because of the lower gaseous density in the outer part. As a result of this, a relatively larger metallicity gradient is established for the model with smaller $C_{\rm SF}$. For the model with larger $C_{\rm SF}$, on the other hand, a larger amount of gas has been converted into metal-enriched stars before the onset of violent relaxation, thus the stellar component in the galaxy merger suffers more severely from chemical mixing driven by violent relaxation owing to less amount of gaseous dissipation. As a result of this, the metallicity gradient is more strongly washed out and consequently the absolute magnitude of it becomes smaller for model with larger $C_{\rm SF}$. The obtained value of metallicity gradient is found to be smaller than that of the typical value of observation, -0.2, for most of models with $R_{\rm che}$ = 0.4. This result indicates that in the present chemodynamical model of galaxy mergers, chemical mixing, controlled basically by the chemical mixing length and the degree of violent relaxation of galaxy merging, is appreciably more efficient than required for reproducing the observed trend.
Next we observe the dependence of the radial gradient of stellar age on the rapidity of star formation. It has been generally considered that it is difficult to derive the age gradient observationally, since the color gradient is affected both by metallicity gradient and by age gradient (i.e., the age-metallicity degeneracy problem). Recently, Faber et al. (1995) and Bressan et al. (1996) have succeeded in breaking the degeneracy by using the combination of line strength indices, H$\beta$ and \[MgFe\]. Faber et al. (1995) furthermore found that outer parts of elliptical galaxies are more likely to be both older and more metal-poor than nuclei. This observational trend is found to be reproduced more successfully in the model with smaller $C_{\rm SF}$ for the present merger model, suggesting that such a trend of age and metallicity gradient of elliptical galaxies is just one of the evidences that an elliptical galaxy is formed by galaxy merging. Figure 8 describes the radial gradient of mean epoch of star formation, $<T_{\ast}>$, which corresponds to the age gradient in merger remnants. As is shown in Figure 8, the age gradient is more discernibly seen in the model with $C_{\rm SF}$ = 0.35 than the model with $C_{\rm SF}$ = 3.5, primarily because in the model with $C_{\rm SF}$ = 0.35, the star formation proceeds more gradual and more later in the inner region of the merger remnant. Since it is found that the stellar metallicity is larger for the central region than for the outer region of a merger remnant, this result means that in the model with $C_{\rm SF}$ = 0.35, the inner part of the merger remnant show both younger age and a larger degree of chemical enrichment whereas in the model with $C_{\rm SF}$ = 3.5, the inner part of the merger remnant show both slightly older age and a slightly larger degree of chemical enrichment. Interestingly, the result for the model with $C_{\rm SF}$ = 3.5 can be seen also in the result of Bressan et al. (1996), which describes that there are a number of elliptical galaxies whose nucleus are both older and more metal-enriched. Thus, the rapidity of star formation is demonstrated to determine both the profiles and the magnitude of the metallicity (and age) gradients in galaxy mergers: Both the metallicity gradient and the age one in the model with rapid star formation are shallower than that with less rapid star formation.
### The shape of isochromes
The shape of isochromes and the degree of the difference between the isochromes and isophotes shapes are considered to be observational clues about the origin of the formation and evolution of elliptical galaxies. As is revealed by the observation of multi-band photometry (e.g. Boroson et al. 1983), the shapes of isochromes are appreciably similar to those of isophotes in elliptical galaxies. In the dissipative collapse model of Larson (1975), the shapes of isochromes are significantly flatter than those of isophotes, which is not in agreement with the above observation. In the Carlberg (1984)’s dissipative collapse model of elliptical galaxy formation, the shapes of isochromes are slightly flatter than the isophotal shapes and thus appears to have succeeded in overcoming the disadvantage of the Larson’s collapse model regarding the difference between isochromes and isophotes shapes. Here, we observe whether or not the shape of isochromes can match reasonably well with that of isophotes in the present dissipative merger model. Although the color of a galaxy is affected by both metallicity and age of stellar populations, we assume that the iso-metallicity contour is exactly the same as the isochromes one and that the iso-density contour is also the same as the isophote one. In Figure 9, we show arbitrary isochromes (solid line) and isophotes (dotted line) for the model with $C_{\rm SF}$ = 3.5. We found that the shapes of isochromes are nearly the same as those of isophotes and furthermore that this trend is not dependent so strongly on the $C_{\rm SF}$. These results suggest that violent relaxation combined with an appreciable amount of gaseous dissipation, which is a specific dynamical process for dissipative galaxy mergers, plays a vital role in producing the shape of isochromes which can match well with the isophotal shape.
Fundamental roles of other parameters
-------------------------------------
In addition to the rapidity of star formation, chemical mixing length, the orbit configuration of galaxy merging, the multiplicity of a merger, and the epoch of galaxy merging are considered to be fundamental factors for chemical, photometric, and spectroscopic properties. We accordingly observe how and to what extent the above four parameters strengthen or lessen the $C_{\rm SF}$ dependence of chemical properties derived in §3.1. Dependence of chemical properties on the four parameters is summarized in Figure 10 for mean stellar metallicity, Figure 11 for mean epoch of star formation, Figure 12 for stellar metallicity gradient, Figure 13 for radial gradient of mean epoch of star formation. What should be emphasized in these figures is that although variety in the values of the above four parameters indeed introduces appreciable scatter in the $C_{\rm SF}$ dependence of chemical properties derived in §3.1, however, the basic trends in the $C_{\rm SF}$ dependence derived in §3.1 is not so drastically changed. For example, the mean stellar metallicity of a merger remnant is larger in the model with larger $C_{\rm SF}$ for a give chemical mixing length, orbit configuration, multiplicity, and merging epoch. Accordingly, in the following parts (§3.2.1 $\sim$ 3.2.4), we mainly present outstanding results which we could not obtain only by varying the value of $C_{\rm SF}$ in the previous subsection §3.1, and furthermore we describe the fundamental roles specific for the above four parameters in determining the chemical properties of merger remnants.
### Mixing length of chemical component
It is considered to be highly uncertain how locally and how well metals ejected from stars with different masses and ages can be actually mixed into interstellar medium in galaxies (e.g., Roy & Kunth 1995). Because of this uncertainty, it is the best way in the preliminary stage of the present study to vary the values of the chemical mixing length, represented by $R_{\rm che}$, in each model and thereby to examine its importance in determining chemical properties of galaxies. We found that irrespective of the values of $C_{\rm SF}$, as the values of $R_{\rm che}$ becomes smaller, the mean stellar metallicity becomes larger (See the seventh column in the Table 1 for Model B6, 7, 8, and 9). This result can be explained as follows. In the model with smaller $R_{\rm che}$, metals produced by star formation in higher density region can be mixed into the surrounding interstellar gas more locally, and accordingly the metals are more likely to be trapped only by the gas in the higher density region. Consequently, chemical enrichment proceeds more preferentially in the higher density regions, where a larger number of stars are formed and thus the mean stellar metallicity in the merger is basically determined. As a result of this, a larger number of stars are more likely to be born from the gas with a larger metallicity, and thus the mean stellar metallicity of merger remnants is larger for galaxy mergers with smaller $R_{\rm che}$. This result indicates that if the $R_{\rm che}$ is larger for the model with smaller $C_{\rm SF}$, the already obtained $C_{\rm SF}$ dependence of mean stellar metallicity is strengthened (See Figure 10.). We also found that for most models, as the values of $R_{\rm che}$ is smaller, the negative metallicity gradient becomes steeper (See Figure 12). This result reflects the fact that the chemical enrichment can proceed more preferentially in the higher density (i.e., inner) region such as the nuclei of mergers in the model with smaller $R_{\rm che}$.
What is the most interesting result derived by varying the $R_{\rm che}$ is that for the model with smaller $R_{\rm che}$ and $C_{\rm SF}$, the mean gaseous metallicity is smaller than the stellar one in the merger remnant (See the sixth and seventh column in the Table1 for Model B6 and B8). This result can not be obtained until both dynamical and chemical evolution are solved in a admittedly self-consistent manner, since the Simple one-zone model predicts that the gaseous metallicity is never smaller than the stellar one. Furthermore, this result provide a valuable clue about the origin of metal-poor hot gaseous halo of elliptical galaxies: The $X$-ray satellite $ASCA$ ($Advanced$ $Satellite$ $for$ $Cosmology$ $and$ $Astrophysics$), the metallicity of the hot $X$-ray gaseous halo is appreciably smaller than that of the stellar component of the host elliptical galaxy (e.g., Matsumoto et al. 1997). The details of the formation of metal-poor gaseous halo will be discussed in our future papers.
### Orbit configuration
Orbit parameters of galaxy merging such as the initial intrinsic spin of progenitor disks and pericenter distance of mergers can affect the degree of violent relaxation and the redistribution of mass and angular momentum during merging, thus determine the transfer process of chemical component in mergers. We accordingly investigate how the initial inclinations of two progenitor disks (Model C, D, and E) and pericenter distance (Model F) can affect the final chemical properties of merger remnants. We found that for the model with larger $C_{\rm SF}$ in each model sequence, Model C, D, E and F, the mean stellar metallicity of merger remnants is larger whereas the mean epoch of star formation ($<T_{\ast}>$) is smaller (See Figures 10 and 11.), which is consistent with the results derived in §3.2 and thus reinforces the importance of the rapidity of star formation in determining the mean stellar metallicity and mean stellar age in merger remnants. As is shown in Figure 12, both the magnitude of negative metallicity gradient and that of age gradient in merger models are distributed with appreciable spread even for a fixed value of $C_{\rm SF}$ (=0.35 and 3.5), suggesting that the spread in the magnitude of metallicity and age gradient observed in elliptical galaxies with a given luminosity is due to the diversity in orbit configuration of galaxy merging. The origin of the relatively larger negative value of metallicity gradient observed for model with nearly prograde-prograde merger (Model D2) is probably that the developed prolate stellar bar in the SB0-like merger remnant more efficiently transfers the chemical component into the central region, and consequently enhances the difference in stellar metallicity between outer and inner region in the galaxy. This result should be compered with the result of Friedli & Benz (1995) in which the rotating stellar bar changes the mass and angular momentum distribution of stars and gas in a galactic disk, and consequently smoothes out the already existing metallicity gradient of the barred galaxy. The difference in the dynamical roles of stellar bars between the present study and that of Friedli & Benz (1995) probably results from the differences in the total amount of gas mass and the strength of dynamical perturbation assumed in the two studies. More detailed studies are required for understanding more clearly the dynamical roles of triaxiality (i.e., barred structure) in determining the chemical gradient of galaxies and their dependences on galaxy types.
### Multiple galaxy merging
Multiple mergers between late-type spirals are suggested to play important roles, for example, in forming field elliptical galaxies (Barnes 1989) and in mitigating the difficulty of pair mergers to produce the observed smaller degree of kinematical misalignment (Weil & Hernquist 1996). We here present the difference in a number of chemical properties of merger remnants between pair mergers and multiple ones (Model G1 and G2). The differences obtained in the present study are the following four: First, irrespectively of $C_{\rm SF}$, a larger amount of interstellar gas is stripped away and consequently can not participate further star formation in multiple mergers than in pair mergers. This is firstly because the tidal stripping of interstellar gas is more efficient in multiple mergers owing to the more violent dynamical interaction between galaxy mergers and secondly because a smaller amount of mass can be transferred to the inner region and thus can not form the higher density gaseous regions in multiple mergers. Second, as a result of this, a larger amount of metal-poor gas finally surrounds the merger remnant in multiple mergers, which might be observed as the metal-poor gaseous $X$-ray halo as is actually observed in elliptical galaxies (e.g., Matsumoto et al. 1997). Third, the $C_{\rm SF}$ dependence of chemical properties in pair merger remnants, in particular, the $C_{\rm SF}$ dependence of metallicity gradient, are less discernable in multiple mergers. This is probably because chemical mixing driven by violent gravitational relaxation of galaxy merging is more effective in multiple mergers. Fourth, in the multiple merger model with $C_{\rm SF}$ = 3.5, the stellar populations in the central part of the merger remnant is both older and less metal-enriched than the outer part, which is a specific characteristic of chemical properties for multiple mergers with larger $C_{\rm SF}$ in the present study. This result is reflected in the fact that in the multiple merger model with $C_{\rm SF}$ = 3.5, the magnitude of metallicity gradient for the region, $0.5 R_{\rm eff} \leq R \leq 5.0 R_{\rm eff}$ ($R_{\rm eff}$ is effective radius.), is -0.07 whereas it is 0.19 for the region, $0.1 R_{\rm eff} \leq R \leq 1.0 R_{\rm eff}$. Actually, Bressan et al. (1996) show that there are a number of galaxies possessing the same trend as is described above. Since only a relatively smaller range of parameter space has been investigated in the present study, we could not here give a stronger statement that the elliptical galaxies with older and less metal-enriched stellar populations in the central part of the galaxies are indicative of multiple mergers. Accordingly, it would be our further study to confirm the above result by performing numerical simulations with a larger range of parameter space for multiple mergers and furthermore to investigate what is the fundamental chemical properties specific for multiple mergers. Thus, these four results demonstrate that the multiplicity in galaxy mergers can also affect a number of chemical properties in merger remnants (thus in elliptical galaxies).
### Epoch of galaxy merging
We here investigate how the difference in the epoch of galaxy merging can affect the fundamental chemical properties of merger remnants by varying the initial separation between two progenitor disk ($r_{\rm in}$) and thereby delaying the epoch of galaxy merging (Model B10 $\sim$ 15). We found that a galaxy merger with larger $r_{\rm in}$ (later merger) becomes an elliptical galaxy with both more metal-enriched and younger stellar populations and furthermore that this tendency does not depend on the values of $C_{\rm SF}$ (See the Figure 14.). These results can be explained as follows: In the later galaxy merger (the model with larger $r_{\rm in}$), a larger amount of interstellar gas can continue to be converted into stellar component and chemically enriched in the progenitor disk for a longer time, since the merging epoch is delayed. Consequently, new stars (younger stellar populations) are more preferentially born from more chemically enriched interstellar gas when the later starburst is triggered by the later galaxy merging. As a result of this, stellar populations in the later galaxy merger are both younger and more metal-enriched on average than the earlier merger. Faber et al. (1995) and Worthey et al. (1996) suggest that if the younger galaxies are actually more metal-rich than older ones, the color-magnitude relation of elliptical galaxies can be equally reproduced without invoking the conventionally believed mass-metallicity relation of elliptical galaxies. They furthermore suggest that even if there exists outstanding spread in the luminosity-weighted age and metallicity among elliptical galaxies, the tightness of the color-magnitude relation can be maintained with a specific assumption that the age and metallicity, $Z$, satisfies the relation, $\Delta \log {\rm age} / \Delta \log Z$ = -1.5 (Worthey’s law). It is remarkable that the above numerical result that a merger remnant with younger stellar populations is more metal-enriched is at least qualitatively consistent with the Worthey’s law. Although more extensive observational studies should be accumulated which can confirm whether or not the Worthey’s law is universal among elliptical galaxies with different luminosity and with different environment, we can say however that the nature of stellar populations of elliptical galaxies is closely associated with the epoch of galaxy merging and thus with the strength of the secondary burst of star formation during galaxy merging. Specifically, it is crucial for chemical and photometric properties of elliptical galaxies formed by galaxy merging how much amount of interstellar gas the progenitor disks still have and to what degree the gas has been already metal-enriched just before galaxy merging. Although our numerical study appears to have succeeded in grasping some essential ingredients concerning the dependence of the chemical properties of merger remnants on the epoch of galaxy merging, a larger range of parameter space should be covered by our future studies in order to confirm the derived dependence.
Finally in this subsection §3.2, we give the dependence of age gradient on metallicity one for all merger models in Figure 15. As is shown in this Figure 15, the merger model with larger magnitude of metallicity gradient show the larger magnitude of age gradient, which is actually observed in Bressan et al. (1996).
Characteristics of stellar populations dependent on galactic luminosity
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
We have so far focused mainly on the parameter dependence of chemical properties of merger remnants and did not intend to describe the photometric and spectroscopic properties of the remnants by adopting a specific mass and size for each merger model in the previous subsections (§3.1 and 3.2), We here describe photometric and spectroscopic properties of merger remnants by assuming that the model with $C_{\rm SF}$ = 1.0 corresponds to the galaxy merger between late-type spirals with mass and size equal to the fiducial values of the present study ($M_{\rm d}$ = 6.0 $\times$ $10^{10}$ $ \rm M_{\odot}$ and $R_{\rm d}$ = 17.5 kpc, respectively) and that $C_{\rm SF}$ $\propto$ $L^{0.55}$ (This assumed relation is plausible, see the Appendix A.). The assumed relation, $C_{\rm SF}$ $\propto$ $L^{0.55}$, means that more luminous elliptical galaxies are formed by galaxy merging with more rapid star formation. For convenient, we consider that for each model, 13 Gyr have passed since the two progenitor galaxies began to merge with a given $r_{in}$. This means that we do not intend to include any $initial$ age difference between galaxy mergers in this consideration, thus means that the derived photometric and spectroscopic properties basically reflect the mean stellar metallicity of the remnants. It should be emphasized here that whether or not the above assumptions on the scaled mass and size of galaxy mergers are $actually$ reasonable and realistic is probably highly uncertain in the present study because of the lack of extensive observational studies on the luminosity dependence of star formation histories of disk galaxies and mergers. Accordingly, the derived luminosity dependence of photometric and spectroscopic properties of merger remnants only reflect the adopted assumptions, and thus we describe them only in a schematic manner. Although this investigation could not allow us to compare the photometric properties of merger remnants with the observational ones of real elliptical galaxies in a more quantitive way, however, it enable us to point out in a quantitative way the possible advantages and disadvantages of the present merger model in reproducing the observed photometric properties of real elliptical galaxies. In the following parts (§3.3.1 and 3.3.2), luminosity dependence of mean stellar metallicity, metallicity gradient, and integrated color of merger remnants are mainly presented.
### Chemical properties
Based upon the results presented in the Figures 10, 11, 12, and 13, we can obtain the following dependence: More luminous elliptical galaxies formed by galaxy merging show (1) larger mean stellar metallicity, (2) smaller central stellar metallicity, and (3) smaller radial gradient of stellar metallicity. The first result appears to agree qualitatively with the mass-metallicity relation implied by the color-magnitude relation of elliptical galaxies (Faber 1973; Visvanathan & Sandage 1977), whereas the second result appears to disagree with the expected luminosity dependence of the central metallicity of elliptical galaxies indicated by the $\rm Mg_{2}$ - $\sigma$ relation (Burstein et al. 1988). It still seems less feasible to determine whether the third result matches with the observed luminosity dependence of stellar metallicity gradient in elliptical galaxies, as is described below. Although a number of observational studies have been accumulated which describe the dependence of the metallicity gradient on galactic parameters, however, the clear trend in the dependence seems less likely, as is described below. Carollo et al. (1992) reported that Mg$_2$ index gradient shows a bimodal trend with mass: For less massive galaxies ($M < 10^{11} M_{\odot}$), the Mg$_2$ gradient increase with increasing mass whereas for massive galaxies ($M > 10^{11} M_{\odot}$), there is no obvious pattern in mass dependence of the gradient. Gonzalez & Gorgas (1996) found the gradient of Mg$_2$ index correlates with the central Mg$_2$ index: Galaxies with steeper gradient of Mg$_2$ index have larger central Mg$_2$ index. Since central Mg$_2$ index becomes larger as the mass of galaxy increases, this correlation suggests that massive galaxies are more likely to have steeper metallicity gradient. Furthermore, Peletier et al. (1990) reported that there is no correlation between color gradient, which is a combination of age and metallicity gradients, and the luminosity of galaxies. Thus, it is safe for us to say that we could not here give any implications on the origin for the dependence of metallicity gradient on the galactic parameters. We must wait further extensive studies which reveal clear trends in the dependence of metallicity gradient on the galactic parameters, in order to compare the derived $C_{\rm SF}$ dependence of metallicity gradient in the present study with the observational results.
### Photometric and spectroscopic properties
Figure 16 is the radial distribution of $U-R$ and $B-R$ color in the merger remnant for the fiducial model with $C_{\rm SF}$ = 1.0. The observed color gradient in this model is principally due to the metallicity gradient of the merger remnant, since the age difference between outer part and inner one in the merger remnant is less than 1 Gyr. We found that this relatively shallower color gradient is more discernibly seen in more luminous merger remnants (mergers with rapid star formation). Figure 17 describes the color-magnitude (CM) relation derived for 25 models. In order to observe the difference in the photometric properties (mean color) between the Simple one-zone model and the present chemodynamical one, we calculate the photometric properties expected from the Simple model for the five standard models (Model B1 $\sim$ 5) by using the star formation history obtained for the five models. The derived results of the Simple one-zone model are plotted in the same figure for five models. As is shown in Figure 17, more luminous merger remnant (corresponding to the galaxy merger with larger $C_{\rm SF}$) show the redder color in the $V-K$, however, the derived luminosity dependence of the integrated color does not agree reasonably well with the observed color-magnitude relation of elliptical galaxies. What this result actually means depends on whether or not we adopt the conventional point of view regarding the origin of the observed CM relation of elliptical galaxies. In the conventional points of view (Faber 1973; Visvanathan & Sandage 1977), the CM relation reflects the mass-metallicity relation of galaxies (‘metallicity effect’ ) whereas in the newly proposed view (Faber et al. 1995; Worthey et al. 1996), the CM relation reflects the fact that less luminous elliptical galaxies are progressively younger than more luminous ones (‘age effect’). If we adopt the former conventional point of view, we should conclude as follows. The above result means that the observed color-magnitude relation (mass-metallicity relation) could not be reproduced so successfully by the present merger model with $C_{\rm SF}$ $\propto$ $L^{0.55}$. As has been already pointed out by Bekki & Shioya (1997c), even the present merger model, in which any age difference between galaxies and any thermal and dynamical feedback effects of star formation are not included, can reproduce at least qualitatively the observed CM relation if we assume that $C_{\rm SF}$ $\propto$ $L^{1.69}$. However, this assumption $C_{\rm SF}$ $\propto$ $L^{1.69}$ seems less plausible, since, for deriving the $C_{\rm SF}$ $\propto$ $L^{1.69}$, we must adopt somewhat particular assumptions, for example, that the initial density of the progenitor disk ($\Sigma$) in a merger depends strongly on the galactic luminosity ($L$) in such a way that $\Sigma$ $\propto$ $L^{4.56}$. Therefore, instead of adopting such apparently less realistic assumptions, we should reconsider other fundamental parameters that are important determinant for chemical evolution of galaxy mergers and strongly depend on the galactic mass, and then again investigate the luminosity dependent chemical and photometric properties of merger remnants. On the other hand, if we adopt the latter fresh point of view (Faber et al. 1995; Worthey et al. 1996), we should conclude as follows. The derived result on the CM relation does not necessarily disagree with the observed CM relation of elliptical galaxies. In this case, we must wait further extensive observational studies which reveal to what extent each ‘age effect’ and ‘metallicity effect’ actually contributes to the generation of the CM relation and clarify the relative importance of the two effects in the reproduction of the CM relation. It would be our future studies to elucidate the origin of the relative importance in the context of dissipative galaxy merging, when the relative contribution of the two ‘age effect’ and ‘metallicity effect’ are observationally clarified. Considering these situations, it is safe for us to say that we can not determine how successfully the present merger model has reproduced the CM relation until more extensive observational studies clarify the relative importance of the two ‘metallicity effect’ and ‘age effect’.
Lastly, we give a comment on the difference in the photometric and spectroscopic properties between the Simple one-zone model and the present chemodynamical one. As is shown in Figure 17, the $V-K$ color is bluer in the Simple model than in the chemodynamical one, which results from the fact that the stellar metallicity in the Simple model is smaller compared with that of the chemodynamical one. This result implies that the chemical, photometric, and spectroscopic properties derived by adopting the Simple one-zone model is not better approximation as is tacitly understood, especially when the more quantitative comparison of the theoretical results with observational ones are required.
Discussion
==========
Outstanding difference between the Simple one-zone model and the present chemodynamical one
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We here present the two outstanding differences in chemical evolution between the Simple one-zone model and the present chemodynamical one, and then give the related implications on the chemical evolution of elliptical galaxies formed by galaxy mergers. First, we stress that even if we discuss the global and mean properties of chemical and photometric evolution of elliptical galaxies formed by galaxy mergers, both chemical and dynamical evolution should be solved in an admittedly self-consistent way. As is described in detail in the previous sections, chemical enrichment process during dissipative galaxy merging with star formation, which is controlled basically by the violent relaxation of galaxy merging and gaseous dissipation, is found to proceed in a considerably inhomogeneous way. This nature of chemical enrichment process provides a remarkably difference between the Simple one-zone model and the present chemodynamical one in that the final gas mass fraction is not only the important determinant for the final stellar metallicity in the present chemodynamical model. As a natural result of this difference, photometric and spectroscopic properties such as the integrated color in $V-K$ is observed to be appreciably different between the Simple one-zone model and the present chemodynamical one. Although the difference in the photometric and spectroscopic properties of merger remnants between the two models is not so large, however, we should recognize how the details of dynamical evolution of forming elliptical galaxies modify the results derived by the Simple one-zone model, especially when comparing the theoretical results more precisely with the observational ones. Furthermore, in the present chemodynamical model, chemical enrichment is found to proceed faster in the higher density region (i.e., inner region) where star formation occurs more efficiently than in the lower density one (i.e., outer region), which strengthens the difference in the degree of chemical enrichment between the higher density (inner) region and the lower (outer) one (‘chemical segregation’). This sort of chemical segregation could give a natural explanation for the origin of the difference in the photometric and spectroscopic properties between the outer and the central part in an elliptical galaxy.
Second, we should emphasize the fundamental roles of chemical mixing length in determining a number of chemical properties in merger remnants, such as the mean stellar metallicity and radial metallicity gradient. Unlike the Simple one-zone model, chemical enrichment is assumed to proceed $locally$ in the present merger model. As is described in detail in the previous sections, both radial metallicity gradient and mean stellar metallicity in merger remnants depend on how locally metals ejected from stellar component can be mixed into interstellar gas: Both mean stellar metallicity and the absolute magnitude of radial gradient of stellar metallicity are larger for the merger remnant with smaller mixing length of chemical component. Moreover, the chemical mixing length is found to determine how much amount of heavy elements ejected from stellar component can be shared by stars or interstellar gas, accordingly to affect the formation of gaseous halo which is less metal-enriched than stellar component of merger remnants. These results suggest that the rapidity of star formation in mergers is not only the dominant factor which determines the chemical properties of merger remnants, thus that we should investigate the physical relation between the rapidity of star formation and chemical mixing length in galaxies and its dependence on galactic luminosity for more clear understanding of the chemical, photometric, and spectroscopic evolution of galaxy mergers. There still remains a wide room for investigating and understanding the chemical evolution of galaxy mergers.
On the origin of color-magnitude relation
-----------------------------------------
The color-magnitude (CM) relation of elliptical galaxies is considered to be one of the most fundamental relations containing valuable information about formation history of elliptical galaxies. The CM relation describes that the integrated color of elliptical galaxies becomes redder as the absolute magnitude of the luminosity decrease (e.g., Faber 1973). Although the age difference between elliptical galaxies has been recently demonstrated to play an important role in the reproduction of the CM relation (e.g., Worthey et al. 1996), it has been conventionally considered that the mean stellar metallicity is larger for more luminous elliptical galaxies (e.g., Tinsley 1978). Larson (1974) originally proposed that this luminosity-dependent mean stellar metallicity observed in elliptical galaxies is essentially ascribed to when star formation is entirely truncated owing to the so-called ‘galactic wind’ driven by accumulated thermal energy produced mainly by supernovae in the early stage of dissipative collapse. Although there is a large number of studies to adopt this ‘galactic wind’ model and to investigate the origin of the CM relation by using evolutionary method of population synthesis (e.g., Arimoto & Yoshii 1987, more recently, Bressan et al. 1994), however, only a few studies have addressed the fundamental question about wether or not the merger model of elliptical galaxy formation can also reproduce the mass-metallicity relation. Thus, we begin to discuss this important issue in terms of elliptical galaxy formation by galaxy merging, provided that the color-magnitude relation reflects the mass-metallicity relation in elliptical galaxies.
As is described in the previous section, what is remarkable in the present merger model is that even if we do not include the thermal and dynamical feedback effects of type II supernovae on the gas dynamics in merging galaxies, final gas mass fraction and mean stellar metallicity in merger remnants depend on the star formation history and thus on galactic luminosity owing to the tidal truncation of star formation. This mechanism that the mass-metallicity relation can be closely associated with the details of dynamics of galaxy merging is quite different from that invoked by the classical galactic wind model. This result furthermore implies that there can be a number of ways to reproduce the mass-metallicity relation in elliptical galaxies and thus the CM relation probably has more profound meanings than we can deduce by invoking only a specific model of elliptical galaxy formation. Here we should note that although our merger model have a potential success in reproducing at least qualitatively the mass-metallicity relation, more totally and successful comparison of our merger model with the mass-metallicity relation required for the reproduction of the CM relation is found to be less promising without appealing the less realistic assumption that $C_{\rm SF} \propto$ $L^{1.69}$ (Bekki & Shioya 1997c). This result implies either that other physical processes such as the thermal and dynamical effects of type II supernovae on the galactic dynamics should be further incorporated into the present merger model, or that the observed CM relation should not be interpreted so simply in terms of mass-metallicity relation. Thus it is one of our further study to investigate to what degree the dynamical and thermal effects of supernovae-driven energy associated with the burst of star formation during galaxy merging can modify the present results. We should also reexamine the validity of the assumption that the observed CM relation is actually mass-metallicity relation of elliptical galaxy, as is described below.
A growing number of observational and theoretical studies aiming at breaking the ‘age-metallicity degeneracy’ suggest that the CM relation of elliptical galaxies does not necessary mean the mass-metallicity relation. Faber et al. (1995) suggest that even if the mean stellar metallicity between elliptical galaxies are the same with each other, the CM relation can be equally reproduced with the assumption that the effective age of stellar populations is progressively younger for less luminous ellipticals (‘age effect’). Furthermore, Worthey et al. (1996) demonstrate that even if the typical or luminosity-weighted age of galaxy is considerably spread (more than several Gyr) between elliptical galaxies for a given luminosity, the tightness of the color-magnitude relation can be maintained with a specific relation that younger elliptical galaxies should be more metal-enriched (the Worthey’s 3/2 law). This result implies that single burst model of elliptical galaxy formation such as the galactic wind one, in which star formation is assumed to be truncated at most within 2 Gyr, can not be accepted at all for a realistic model of elliptical galaxy formation. Kodama & Arimoto (1996) construct a specific model designed to mimic the ‘age effect’ in order to check the validity of the above suggestion and demonstrate that the pure ‘age effect’ is not convincing for reproducing both the tightness of the color-magnitude relation observed in the present cluster ellipticals and that in the intermediate redshift cluster ellipticals. It is safe to say here that neither the pure ‘age effect’ nor the pure ‘metallicity effect’ (i.e., mass-metallicity relation) could explain a growing number of evidences suggesting the diversity of star formation history in elliptical galaxies. We must wait more extensive observational studies which can confirm whether the suspected age spread and the Worthey’s 3/2 law, both of which shed new insight on the origin of the CM relation, are robust and does not depend on the galactic mass, environment, and redshift. We can say, however, that both the age spread and the Worthey’s 3/2 law could be naturally explained by the present merger model in a rather qualitative manner. As is demonstrated in the previous sections, the epoch of galaxy merging can affect both the mean age and metallicity of merger remnants in the sence that later mergers are more likely to become ellipticals with more metal-enriched and younger stellar populations. This result suggests that the Worthey’s 3/2 law can be essentially ascribed to the difference in the epoch of galaxy merging between galaxy mergers. Furthermore, as is predicted by the semi-analytical models of galaxy formation based upon the hierarchical clustering scenario with CDM cosmogony (e.g., Baugh et al. 1996), it is quite reasonable that the epoch of galaxy merging differs from galaxies to galaxies. Accordingly the luminosity weighted ages, which might be dependent on the strength of the secondary starbursts in galaxy merging, can be naturally spread between elliptical galaxies formed by galaxy merging. Thus galaxy merging between late-type spirals, which might be occurred in variedly different epoch, is a promising candidate that can explain the apparent diversity of star formation history observed in real elliptical galaxy and nevertheless can explain the tightness of the CM relation of elliptical galaxies.
Conclusion
==========
Main results obtained in the present study are summarized as follows.
\(1) Galaxy mergers with more rapid star formation become ellipticals with larger mean stellar metallicity, primarily because in the mergers with more rapid gas consumption, a smaller amount of metal-enriched gas is tidally stripped away during merging and consequently a larger amount of the gas can be converted into stellar component. This result is demonstrated not to depend so strongly on the other parameters such as the orbit configuration of galaxy merging and multiplicity of the mergers. These results suggest that the origin of the color-magnitude relation of elliptical galaxies can be closely associated with the details of merging dynamics which depends on the rapidity of star formation (thus on the galactic luminosity) in galaxy mergers.
\(2) Negative metallicity gradient fitted reasonably well by power-low can be reproduced by dissipative galaxy mergers with star formation, which is in good agreement with the recent observational results of elliptical galaxies. The absolute magnitude of metallicity gradient in each merger remnant depends on the orbit configuration of each galaxy merging, suggesting that the observed dispersion in the absolute magnitude of metallicity gradient for a given luminosity range of elliptical galaxies reflects the diversity in the orbit configuration of galaxy merging.
\(3) Absolute magnitude of metallicity gradient correlates with that of age gradient in a merger in the sence that a merger remnant with steeper negative metallicity gradient is more likely to show steeper age gradient. This result reflects the fact that the degree of violent relaxation and gaseous dissipation during merging strongly affect both the age gradient and metallicity one.
\(4) The outer part of stellar populations is both older and less metal-enriched than nuclei in an elliptical galaxy formed by galaxy merging with less rapid star formation. Moreover galaxy mergers with less rapid star formation are more likely to become ellipticals with metal-poor gaseous halo. This result suggests that the formation of metal-poor $X$-ray halo actually observed in elliptical galaxies can be essentially ascribed to the dissipative galaxy merging between late-type spirals, and furthermore provides a clue to a solution for the iron abundance discrepancy problem in elliptical galaxies.
\(5) The epoch of galaxy merging affects both the mean stellar metallicity and the mean stellar age in merger remnants: Later galaxy mergers become ellipticals with both younger and more metal-enriched stellar populations. This result suggests that the origin of Worthey’s 3/2 rule (Worthey et al. 1996), which is invoked in maintaining the tightness of the color-magnitude relation of elliptical galaxies, can be understood in terms of the difference in the epoch of galaxy formation and transformation, that is, the epoch of galaxy merging, between elliptical galaxies.
\(6) Luminosity dependence of chemical, photometric, and spectroscopic properties in merger remnants, which is derived by adopting a specific assumption on the luminosity dependence of the rapidity of star formation of galaxy mergers, does not match so reasonable well with that observed in real elliptical galaxies. This result implies that other fundamental physical processes expected to be dependent on the galactic luminosity should be incorporated into the present merger model for more successful comparison with observational trends of luminosity-dependent chemical, photometric, and spectroscopic properties of elliptical galaxies.
\(7) As is described in the above (1) - (6), the details of gas dynamics of galaxy merging, in particular, the tidal stripping of metal-enriched interstellar gas and the degree of gaseous dissipation during merging, both of which depend on the star formation history of galaxy mergers, are demonstrated to determine even the chemical and photometric properties of merger remnants. These results can not be obtained until both the chemical and dynamical evolution during galaxy merging are solved numerically in a reasonably self-consistent way.
We are grateful to the referee for valuable comments, which contribute to improve the present paper. K.B. thanks to the Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS) Research Fellowships for Young Scientist.
The expected luminosity dependence of the parameter $C_{\rm SF}$
================================================================
The importance of $C_{\rm SF}$
------------------------------
In the present study, we adopt the assumption that more massive (luminous) elliptical galaxies are formed by galaxy $major$ merging between more massive (luminous) late-type spirals, and thereby investigate how the difference of galactic mass (luminosity) of progenitor disks in a merger can affect the chemical and photometric properties of merger remnants. It is reasonable and realistic that if the mass of merger progenitor is different between galaxy mergers, there could be remarkable differences between mergers in the fundamental physical processes related to the chemical evolution of galaxies, such as the duration, strength, time-scale of star formation (star formation history), dissipative dynamics of interstellar gas, thermal and dynamical effects of accumulated thermal energy driven supernovae events, and the chemical mixing driven by the dynamics of galaxy merging. Accordingly, we should investigate such physical processes expected to be dependent on galactic mass (luminosity) and thereby clarify the relative importance of these processes. Among these, what has been the most extensively examined in the previous studies is the thermal and dynamical ‘feedback’ effects associated with the supernovae events, primarily because the ratio of the accumulated thermal energy driven by the supernovae to the total potential energy of galaxies has been considered to depend predominantly on galactic luminosity. Although there are a number of important issues which should be addressed extensively, we here focus on the difference in the star formation history between galaxy mergers with different mass (or luminosity), and thus other important issues will be explored in our future papers.
The adopted ‘working hypothesis’ that galactic mass predominantly determines the star formation history of elliptical galaxies is quite realistic and reasonable, since a growing number of observational studies support this hypothesis. For example, the line ratio of \[Mg/Fe\], which can be interpreted as the strength of the past activity of type-II supernovae relative to that of the type I supernovae, implies that more luminous elliptical galaxies are more likely to truncate their star formation earlier (e.g., Worthey et al. 1992). Furthermore, as is suggested by the analysis of H$\beta$ line index, the epoch, the strength, and the duration of the latest star formation of elliptical galaxies seem quite diverse, implying that the classical single burst picture of elliptical galaxy formation becomes less attractive (Faber et al. 1995). It should be also emphasized that the $B-H$ color in more luminous disk galaxies, which are considered to be merger precursors of more luminous ellipticals in the present study, is found to be redder than the less luminous one (Wyse 1982; Bothun et al. 1985; Gavazzi & Scodeggio 1996). These lines of observational evidences strongly motivate us to clarify the important roles of star formation history in determining the chemical and photometric properties as well as dynamical and kinematical ones in elliptical galaxies.
In the present paper, we focus particularly on the time-scale of gas consumption by star formation $relative$ $to$ $the$ $dynamical$ $time-scale$ of galaxy mergers: It should be emphasized here that the time-scale of gas consumption by star formation is not considered to be an important determinant but the time-scale of gas consumption by star formation $relative$ $to$ $the$ $dynamical$ $time$-$scale$ is to be an important determinant. The reason for this consideration is explained as follows. The time-scale of gas consumption by star formation is the typical time-scale within which heavy elements are produced by star formation and mixed into interstellar medium. The dynamical time-scale is the typical time-scale within which violent relaxation during galaxy merging cause the mass and angular momentum redistribution and thus the dynamical mixing of heavy elements produced by star formation. Therefore, if the dynamical time-scale is much larger than the gas consumption time-scale, star formation can proceed quite efficiently before the system reach the dynamical equilibrium, and consequently the larger amount of heavy elements produced by the star formation can suffer more effective dynamical mixing of the heavy elements during galaxy merging. Thus, since the dynamics of galaxy merging can strongly affect even the chemical evolution in the present merger model, the ratio of the above two time-scales are expected to be more essential for the chemodynamical evolution of galaxy mergers. For convenient, the inverse ratio of the time-scale of gas consumption by star formation to the dynamical time-scale is referred to as the rapidity of star formation and represented by the parameter $C_{\rm SF}$. It is the $C_{\rm SF}$ that we consider to depend strongly on the galactic luminosity, accordingly, we investigate the most extensively the important roles of $C_{\rm SF}$ in determining fundamental characteristics of elliptical galaxies in the present study.
A possible luminosity dependence of $C_{\rm SF}$
------------------------------------------------
The expected luminosity (mass) dependence of $C_{\rm SF}$ is described as follows. The parameter $C_{\rm SF}$ is set to be proportional to $T_{\rm dyn}$/$T_{\rm SF}$, where $T_{\rm dyn}$ and $T_{\rm SF}$ are the dynamical time-scale and the time-scale of gas consumption by star formation, respectively. We here define the mass of a galactic disk, the total mass of luminous and dark matter, and size of the progenitor as $M_d$, $M_t$, and $R_d$, respectively. We consider here that gas mass in a disk is equal to $M_d$ for simplicity. The $T_{\rm dyn}$ is given as $$T_{\rm dyn} \propto R_d^{3/2} M_t^{-1/2}$$ Provided that the coefficient in the Schmidt law is not dependent on the galactic mass (or luminosity), we can derive $T_{\rm SF}$ as follows. $$T_{\rm SF} \propto \Sigma^{1 - \gamma} \; ,$$ where $\Sigma$ is the surface density of the gas disk. The parameter $\gamma$ is the exponent of Schmidt law, which is the same as that used in previous subsections. Assuming the Freeman’s law and the constant ratio of $R_d$ to the scale length of exponential disk, we derive $$\Sigma \propto M_d R_d^{-2} \sim {\rm const.}$$ Assuming that the degree of self-gravity of a galactic disk is described as $$M_t \propto M_d^{(1 - \beta)} \; \; ,$$ then we can derive $$C_{\rm SF} \propto M_d^{1/4 + \beta/2} \; \; .$$ Since $\beta$ is considered to have positive value ($\beta = 0.6$: Saglia 1996), this relationship predicts that $C_{\rm SF}$ becomes larger as $M_d$ increases. Furthermore, if we assume the constant mass to light ratio for luminous matter, we can obtain the luminosity dependence of $C_{\rm SF}$. In this case, the dependence is described as $C_{\rm SF} \propto L_d^{0.55}$, where $ L_d^{0.55}$ is disk luminosity, for $\beta = 0.6$. Alternatively, if we adopt the observed trend that more luminous disks have large surface density, such as $\Sigma \propto M_d$ (McGaugh & Blok 1997), we can obtain $C_{\rm SF} \propto M_d^{1/2 + \beta/2}$. Thus, these simple theoretical arguments suggest that larger (or more luminous) disk galaxies are more likely to have larger values of $C_{\rm SF}$.
Structure and morphology of merger remnants
===========================================
Although our main purpose of the present paper is not concerned with the dynamical properties of elliptical galaxies, we briefly describe how successfully the present merger model can reproduce the luminosity-dependent dynamical properties of elliptical galaxies. The reason for this is that since in the present merger model, the details of chemical evolution are strongly affected by the dynamical evolution of galaxy mergers, observing the dynamical evolution of dissipative galaxy merging with star formation would help us to understand more clearly the present results on chemical evolution of galaxy mergers.
Dependence on $C_{\rm SF}$
--------------------------
First we present morphological, structural, and kinematical properties of merger remnants and their dependence on $C_{\rm SF}$. As is described in details by Bekki & Shioya (1997a, b), the galaxy mergers with larger $C_{\rm SF}$ are found to be more likely to become elliptical galaxies with less strongly supported by global rotation, less strongly self-gravitating, smaller central surface brightness, larger cores, and boxy isophotal shape. Figure 18 describes the morphological evolution of the model with $C_{\rm SF}$ = 0.35 (Model B1). As the dynamical interaction between star-forming disk galaxies becomes stronger, an appreciably amount of metal enriched gas is tidally stripped away from the disks and finally surrounds the developed elliptical galaxy without further star formation and chemical enrichment. The developed metal-poor gaseous halo might be observed as the hot and metal-poor X-ray halo of elliptical galaxies, which has been recently revealed by the $ASCA$ (e.g., Matsumoto et al. 1997). The final morphology of merger remnants depends strongly on the rapidity of star formation represented by the $C_{\rm SF}$, as is shown in Figure 19: A galaxy merger with less rapid star formation becomes a more compact elliptical galaxy. The density profiles of merger remnants are well fitted by $R^{1/4}$ law, however, the systematical deviation from the $R^{1/4}$ law is also observed depending on values of $C_{\rm SF}$, as is shown in Figure 20. Unlike the late galaxy merger in which the gas mass fraction of the precursor disk is less than 0.2, the present merger model with highly dissipative nature of interstellar gas succeeds in boosting up more significantly the central density of merger remnant compared with isolated disk models (Model A1 and A2). This result suggests the problems related to phase space density of elliptical galaxies (Ostriker 1980; Carlberg 1986) can be successfully resolved in high-redshift galaxy mergers, as has been already indicated by Kormendy & Sanders (1992). These results imply that galaxy mergers with star formation and gaseous dissipation, which might be occurred the most frequently at higher redshift, can naturally explain the fundamental dynamical and kinematical properties of elliptical galaxies (For further details, see Bekki & Shioya (1997a, b).).
Dependence on galactic luminosity
---------------------------------
By adopting a specific assumption on the luminosity dependence of the parameter $C_{\rm SF}$, we can observe how successfully the present merger can reproduce the $luminosity-dependent$ morphological, structural, and kinematical properties of elliptical galaxies. Although describing the dynamical properties of elliptical galaxies and their dependence on galactic luminosity is not main purpose of this paper, however, we beforehand and briefly discuss them, since we will point out advantages and disadvantages of the present merger model in reproducing $both$ dynamical properties and chemical ones of elliptical galaxies in the section §4. Observational results indicate that more luminous elliptical galaxies are more likely to be less rotationally supported (Davies et al. 1983), possess less luminous surface densify (Djorgovski et al. 1996) and smaller phase space density (Carlberg 1986), have boxy isophote (Kormendy & Bender 1996) and larger cores (Kormendy & Djorgovski 1989). If we assume that $C_{\rm SF} \propto L^{0.55}$, that is, more luminous elliptical galaxies are formed by galaxy mergers with more rapid star formation, our numerical results are consistent with the above observed trends of $luminosity-dependent$ dynamical properties of elliptical galaxies at least in a qualitative manner. For example, the observed trend that the galactic core radius is more likely to be larger for the more luminous elliptical galaxy can be naturally explained by the present merger model that more luminous ellipticals are formed by galaxy $major$ merging between more luminous spirals. The first reason for this is that since more luminous spirals $initially$ are more likely to have larger ‘cores’ (or smaller central phase space density) as is implied by the Freeman’s law and the relation between galactic luminosity and scale-length (e.g., McGaugh and Blok 1997), galaxy mergers between spirals with larger cores are more likely to become ellipticals with larger cores (or smaller central phase space density). The second reason is that more luminous galaxy mergers are less dissipative owing to the more rapid consumption of interstellar gas, and consequently become ellipticals with less degree of central concentration. Hence the luminosity-dependent central structure in elliptical galaxies could reflect the luminosity-dependent dynamical structure of disk galaxies and the star formation history of galaxy mergers. Our numerical results imply furthermore that any particular physical processes such as the dynamical heating of the central cores by binary black holes (Ebisuzaki, Makino, & Okumura 1991) are not necessarily required for the formation of larger cores in more luminous elliptical galaxies. Thus, our numerical results strongly suggest that the luminosity-dependent dynamical structure of elliptical galaxies can be understood in the context of the difference in luminosity-dependent dynamical structure of progenitor disks and the star formation history between gas-rich galaxy mergers. This furthermore indicates that total amount of gaseous dissipation and the degree of violent relaxation during merging, both of which are determined basically by the star formation history of galaxy mergers, are important factors which can affect the luminosity-dependent morphological, structural, and kinematical properties of elliptical galaxies. The validity of the suggested point of view that luminosity-dependent dynamical structures of elliptical galaxies are essentially ascribed to the difference in the star formation history between elliptical galaxies formed by dissipative galaxy merging has been also investigated by (Bekki & Shioya 1997b) in the context of the origin of the fundamental plane of elliptical galaxies. Although more elaborated numerical studies including more realistic implementation of star formation and gaseous dissipation are definitely required for confirming the validity of the results obtained in the present study, the merger scenario that more luminous ellipticals are formed by dissipative and $major$ galaxy merging between more luminous spirals seems likely in the context of the reproduction of the observed luminosity-dependent dynamical properties of elliptical galaxies.
Self-consistency of the present merger model
--------------------------------------------
Our final goal is to construct a more realistic model which can clearly explain both the structural and kinematical properties, such as the origin of the fundamental plane (Djorgovski & Davis 1987; Dressler et al. 1987), boxy-disky dichotomy (Kormendy & Bender 1996), and surface brightness - effective radius relation (Djorgovski et al. 1996), and the chemical and photometric properties, such as the color-magnitude relation (Faber 1973; Visvanathan & Sandage 1977) and luminosity-dependent radial gradient of metallicity, age, and color (Peletier et al. 1990; Davies et al. 1991). Therefore it is essential to discuss how successfully the present merger model has actually reproduced or would reproduce both the dynamical and kinematical properties and chemical and photometric ones in a self-consistent way. What is the most vital in addressing this crucial issue is to try to explain both the $luminosity-dependent$ dynamical and chemical properties of elliptical galaxies. Since the present study is the first step toward the complete understanding of elliptical galaxy formation, we first make only a qualitative comparison of the present results with observational one, then we point out the advantages and disadvantages of the present merger model in reproducing both the $luminosity-dependent$ dynamical and chemical properties of real elliptical galaxies. In the following discussions, we adopt the assumption that galaxy mergers with larger $C_{\rm SF}$ become more luminous elliptical galaxies, mainly because this assumption is realistic and essential for explaining the morphological and kinematical properties of elliptical galaxies formed by galaxy merging (Bekki & Shioya 1997a, b).
As is described in details by Bekki & Shioya (1997a, b), more luminous elliptical galaxies formed by dissipative galaxy merging with star formation are less rotationally supported, less compact, less strongly self-gravitating, and more likely to have boxy isophotal shape. In the present study, more luminous elliptical galaxies are found to be more likely to be redder in global color than less luminous ones. These obtained results concerning the luminosity dependence of structural, dynamical and photometric properties agree at least qualitatively with the observed trends of elliptical galaxies in a self-consistent manner. These results strongly suggest that both the origin of luminosity-dependent dynamical and morphological structure and that of the luminosity-dependent chemical, photometric, and spectroscopic properties in elliptical galaxies are closely associated with the star formation history, in particular, with the rapidity of star formation in galaxy mergers. Furthermore these results imply that dissipative galaxy merging with star formation, which might be the most frequently occurred in higher redshift, has a number of advantages in reproducing the nature of elliptical galaxies than we have previously expected.
What we should note here is that the present merger model also has a number of problems concerning the self-consistent reproduction of structural and chemical properties of elliptical galaxies. One of the problems that should be foremost resolved is on the luminosity dependence of the central surface brightness (or density) and that of the central stellar metallicity in elliptical galaxies. Observational studies have revealed that more luminous elliptical galaxies show both less luminous central (or effective) surface brightness, as is indicated by the Kormendy relation (e.g., Djorgovski et al. 1996), and the larger central stellar metallicity, as is indicated by $\rm Mg_{2}$ - $\sigma$ relation (Burstein et al. 1988). This fundamental tendency of elliptical galaxies has not yet be reproduced by the present merger model, because the present model predicts that more luminous elliptical galaxies show less luminous central surface (and larger cores) brightness but the smaller central stellar metallicity compared with less luminous ones. This sort of failure can be seen also in the dissipative collapse models of Larson (1975) and Carlberg (1984), in which elliptical galaxies with larger central stellar metallicity show more luminous central surface brightness (or smaller cores). We consider these apparent failures are probably due to the ill approximation of the adopted instantaneous recycling, in which chemical enrichment is assumed to proceed considerably faster than the dynamical evolution. Actually the instantaneous recycling approximation is expected to give an undesirable result to less luminous elliptical galaxies, in which the dynamical time-scale of the systems is comparable or only slightly larger than the typical life-time of massive stars (a few $10^{7}$ yr). Specifically, for less luminous galaxies, dynamical evolution such as the violent relaxation and redistribution of angular momentum of gas and stars, which plays a vital role in transferring and mixing dynamically chemical components, probably finishes earlier before the onset of efficient chemical enrichment driven by type II supernovae. As a result of this, the dynamical transfer of chemically enriched components into the inner region of galaxies, which determines the magnitude of the central stellar metallicity, are less likely for less luminous elliptical galaxies. This indicates the ratio of the typical time-scale of chemical enrichment (a few $10^{7}$ yr) to the dynamical time-scale and its luminosity dependence are more essential for the chemodynamical evolution of less luminous elliptical galaxies. This kind of chemical evolution expected for less luminous ellipticals (mergers) is probably not modeled by the present chemodynamical model in a proper way, accordingly the present model with instantaneous recycling should be greatly modified to a more realistic one. Hence, it is our future and essential study to consider the importance of the ratio of the time-scale of chemical enrichment to the dynamical time-scale in elliptical galaxy formation and then to investigate again whether or not the remaining problem of the present merger model can be resolved in the more sophisticated models of chemodynamical evolution.
Thus, the present numerical study suggests that merger remnants with larger central metallicity are more likely to show larger central surface density, which appears to disagree with the observational trend of real elliptical galaxies. This apparent failure of the present merger model accordingly leads us to the conclusion that other important physical process associated with dissipative galaxy merging, such as the thermal and dynamical feedback effects of star formation, should be included for more successful comparison with the observational results. The alternative conclusion is that the instantaneous recycling approximation adopted in the present study could not be so appropriate for analyzing both chemical and dynamical evolution in galaxy mergers, especially for less luminous galaxy mergers in which typical time-scale of chemical enrichment is comparable or larger than the dynamical time-scale of the mergers.
Arag$\rm \acute{o}$n-Salamanca, A., Ellis, R. S., Couch, W. J., & Carter D. 1993, , 262, 764
Arimoto, N., & Yoshii, Y. 1987, , 173, 23
Barnes, J. E. 1989, Nat, 338, 123
Barnes, J. 1992 , 393, 484
Barnes, J., & Hernquist, L. 1992, , 30, 705
Barnes, J., & Hernquist, L. 1996, , 471, 115
Baugh, C. M., Cole, S., & Frenk, C. S. 1996, , 283, 1361
Bekki, K., & Shioya, Y. 1997a, ApJ, 478, L17
Bekki, K., & Shioya, Y. 1997b, submitted to
Bekki, K., & Shioya, Y. 1997c, , in press
Bender, R. 1996, in New light on galaxy evolution, ed. R. Bender, R. Davies, IAU symp. 171, p181
Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. 1987 in Galactic Dynamics, Princeton; Princeton Univ. Press.
Boroson, T. A., Thompson, I. B., & Shectman, S. A. 1983, , 88, 1707
Bothun, G. D., Mould, A. J., Schommer, R. A., Aaronson, M. 1985, , 291, 586
Bower, R. G., Lucey, J. R., & Ellis, R. S. 1992, , 254, 601
Bressan, A., Chiosi C., & Tantalo, R. 1996, , 311, 425
Burstein, D., Bertola, F., Buson, L. M., Faber, S. M., & Lauer, T. R. 1988, , 328, 440
Caon, N., Capaccioli, M., & D’onofrio, M. 1993, , 265, 1013
Carlberg, R. G. 1984, , 286, 416
Carlberg, R. G. 1986, , 310, 593
Carollo, C. M., Danziger, I. J., & Buson, L. 1993, , 265, 553
Cowie, L. L., Gardner, J. P., Hu, E. M., Songaila, A., Hodapp, K.-W., & Wainscoat, J. W. 1994, , 434, 114
Davies, R. L., Sadler, E. M., & Peletier, F. 1993, , 262, 650
Djorgovski, S., & Davis, M. 1987, , 313, 59
Djorgovski, S., Pahre, M. A., & de Carvalho R. R. 1996, in Fresh Views of Elliptical Galaxies, ed. A. Buzzoni, R. Renzini, and A. Serrano, ASP Conf. Ser. Vol 86, p129
Dressler, A., Lynden-Bell, D., Burstein, D., Davies, R. L., Faber, S. M., Terlevich, R. J., & Wegner, G. 1987, , 313, 42
Ebisuzaki, T., & Makino, J., & Okumura, S. K. 1991, Nat, 354, 212
Ellis, R. S., Smail, I., Dressler, A., Couch, W. J., Oemler, A., Butcher, H., & Sharples R.M. 1996, preprint astro-ph/9607154
Elmegreen D. M., 1996, A.S.P. Conf. Ser. vol 91, Barred Galaxies, IAU Colloquium 157, ed. R. Buta, D. A. Crocker, and B. G. Elmegreen, p23
Faber, S. M. 1973, , 179, 731
Faber, S. M., Trager, S. C., Gonzalez, J. J., & Worthey, G. 1995, in Stellar Population ed. P.C. van der Kruit and G.Gilmore, IAU 164, p. 249
Fall, S. M., & Efstathiou, G. 1980, , 193, 189
Forman, W., Jones, C., & Tucker, W. 1985, , 293, 102
Franx, M., Illingworth, G. D., & de Zeeuw, T. 1991, , 383, 112
Franx, M. & van Dokkum, P. G. 1996, in New light on galaxy evolution ed. R. Bender, R. Davies, IAU symp. 171, p233
Friedli, D., & Benz, W. 1995, , 301, 649
Gavazzi, G., & Scodeggio, M. 1996, , 312, L29
González, J. J., & Gorgas, J. 1996, in Fresh Views of Elliptical Galaxies, ed. A.Buzzoni, A.Renzini, and A.Serrano, ASP Conf.Ser. Vol.86, p. 225
Hamann, F. & Ferland, G. 1993, , 418, 11
Hernquist, L., Spergel, D. N., & Heyl, J. S. 1993, , 416, 415
Katz, N. 1992, , 391, 502
Kauffmann, G., & Charlot, S. 1997, preprint astro-ph/9704148
Kennicutt, R. C. 1989, , 344, 685
Kodama, T., & Arimoto, N. 1997, , 320, 41
Kormendy, J. 1987, in Nearly Normal Galaxies, Springer-Verlag, p. 163
Kormendy, J., Djorgovski, S. 1989, , 27, 235
Kormendy, J., & Sanders, D. B. 1992, , 390, L53
Kormendy, J., & Bender, R. 1996, , 464, 119
Kurucz, R. L. 1992, in Stellar Population of Galaxies, ed. B. Barbuy & A. Renzini (Dordrecht : Kluwer), 225
Larson, R. B. 1969, , 145, 405
Larson, R. B. 1975, , 173, 671
Matsumoto, H., Koyama, K., Awaki, H., Tsuru, T., Loewenstein, M., & Matsushita, K. 1997, preprint [*astro-ph/9701077*]{}
Matteucci, F., 1994, , 188, 57
McGaugh, S. S., & de Blok, W. J. G. 1997, , in press
McKee, C. F., & Ostriker, J. P. 1977, , 218, 148
Mihos, J. C., Richstone, D. O., & Bothun, G. D. 1992, , 400, 153
Mihos, J. C., & Hernquist, L. 1994, , 427, 112
Navarro, J., & White, S. D. M. 1993, , 265, 271
Ostriker, J. P. 1980, Comm. on Astrophys., 8, 177
Peletier, R. F., Davies, R. L., Illingworth, G. D., Davis, L. E., & Cawson, M. 1990, , 100, 1091
Roy, J. R., & Kunth, D. 1995, , 294, 432
Saglia, R. P. 1996, in New light on galaxy evolution ed. R. Bender, R. Davies, IAU symp. 171, p157
Schmidt, M. 1959, , 344, 685
Schwarz, M. P. 1981, , 247, 77
Schweizer, F. & Seitzer, P. 1992, , 104, 1039
Silva, D. R., & Bothun, G. D. 1997, preprint
Steinmetz, M., & Müller, E. 1994, , 281, L97
Sugimoto, D., Chikada, Y., Makino, J., Ito, T., Ebisuzaki, T., & Umemura, M. 1990, , 345, 33
Tantalo, R., Chiosi, C., Bressan, A., & Fagotto, F. 1996, , 311, 361
Toomre, A., & Toomre, J. 1972, , 178,623
van den Bergh, S. 1995, , 110, 2700
van den Bergh, S., Abraham, R. G., Ellis, R. S., Tanvir, N. R., Santiago, B. X., & Glazerbrook, K. 1996, , 112, 359
Visvanathan, N., & Sandage, A. 1977, , 216, 214
Weil, M. L., & Hernquist, L. 1996, , 460, 101
White, S. D. M. 1980, , 191, 1p
Wielen, R. 1977, , 60, 263
Worthey, G., Trager, S. C., & Faber, S. M. 1996, in Fresh Views of Elliptical Galaxies, ed. A.Buzzoni, A.Renzini, and A.Serrano, ASP Conf.Ser. Vol.86, p. 203
Wyse, R. F. G. 1982, , 199, 1p
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: |
We report on the preparation of thin films and multilayers of the intermetallic Heusler compound , , and by rf-sputtering on MgO and Al$_{2}$O$_{3}$ substrates. can be grown epitaxially with (100)-orientation on MgO (100) and in (110)-orientation on Al$_{2}$O$_{3}$ a-plane. The Co based Heusler alloys need metallic seedlayers to induce high quality textured growth. We also have prepared multilayers with smooth interfaces by combining the Heusler compounds with Au and V. An analysis of the ferromagnetic saturation magnetization of the films indicates that the -compound tends to grow in the disordered $B2$-type structure whereas the Co-based Heusler alloy thin films grow in the ordered $L2_1$ structure. All multilayers with thin layers of the Heusler compounds exhibit a definitely reduced ferromagnetic magnetization indicating substantial disorder and intermixing at the interfaces.\
address: ' Institut für Experimentalphysik IV, Ruhr-Universität D44780 Bochum, Germany '
author:
- 'U. Geiersbach'
- 'A. Bergmann'
- 'K. Westerholt'
title: 'Preparation and structural properties of thin films and multilayers of the Heusler compounds Cu$_{2}$MnAl, Co$_{2}$MnSn, Co$_{2}$MnSi and Co$_{2}$MnGe '
---
Magnetic properties and measurements; Multilayers; 81.15Cd;75.70.-i
\[sec:level1\]Introduction\
===========================
The new, rapidly evolving field of magnetoelectronics [@art:park98] started an upsurge of interest in ferromagnetic metals with full spin polarization at the Fermi level. In principal these so called half metallic ferromagnets are ideal for applications in tunnelling magnetoresistance (TMR)[@art:Moodera] or giant magnetoresistance (GMR) [@art:Dieny] elements and as electrodes for spin polarized current injection into semiconductors.\
Half metallic ferromagnetic alloys are scarce, since usually the s- and p-type valence electrons contribute both spin directions at the Fermi level. From electronic energy band structure calculations on knows several ferromagnetic oxides like $CrO_{2}$ [@art:Schwarz] and $La_{1-x}Sr_{x}MnO_{3}$ [@art:park98]. Until now there are only a few intermetallic compounds known to have this unique property, all belonging to the Heusler group with the general formula $A_2BX$ (A=Cu, Co, Ni…, B=Mn, Fe..., X=Al, Ge, Si)[@pbk:ziebeck]. The basic ordered Heusler structure is a cubic lattice (space group Fm3m) with four interpenetrating fcc sublattices occupied by A, B or X- atoms respectively. There are several structural variants of the Heusler unit cell with different degrees of site disorder of the atoms on the A, B and X-positions. Among them the B2 structure with a random occupancy of the B and X-position and the completely disordered bcc structure with a random occupancy on the A, B and X-positions [@pbk:ziebeck].\
The ferromagnetic half metals known from theoretical electron energy band structure calculations are the compounds $PtMnSb$ and $NiMnSb$ [@art:deGroot83] (so called half Heusler compounds since one A-sublattice is empty) and the compounds and [@art:ishida2-98]. and $Co_2MnSb$ in a strict sense do not belong to this group, since they possess only about 90 % of spin polarization at the Fermi level, but they can be made half metallic ferromagnets by alloying [@art:ishida1-95].\
In recent years the properties of thin films of the half Heusler compounds $PtMnSb$ and $NiMnSb$ have been studied intensely by several groups in order to elucidate their potential in the field of magnetoelectronics [@art:kabani90]. These compounds have also been tested already in TMR- and GMR-thin film devices [@art:caballero99], however with only moderate success until now. The main difficulty one encountered when preparing thin films of the half Heusler compounds is a high degree of site disorder. This leads, on the one hand, to strong electron scattering and a low electron mean free path which has a negative influence of the amplitude of the GMR [@art:Kautzky]. On the other hand, it is expected that the site disorder destroys the full spin polarization at the Fermi level, which theoretically has been predicted only when assuming perfectly ordered $A_2BX$ structure with pure $L2_1$ type of site symmetry [@art:Orgassa].\
The half metallic ferromagnets from the Heusler group , , and $Co_2MnSn_{1-x}Sb_x$ found much less attention in the experimental literature until now. Recently two groups published first investigations of GMR elements using [@art:raphael01] and [@art:ambrose01]. Similar to the results on the spin valves based on the half Heusler compounds the amplitude of the GMR was found to be very low, the reason for this was not clear. We have presented our first experimental results on thin films of the Co-based Heusler compounds in [@art:Geiersbach]. In this paper we present in the first part a detailed study of the preparation and structural properties of thin films of the Heusler phases , , and . The latter Heusler phase is a ferromagnet but not half metallic [@art:kuebler83]. We use it as a reference compound and as a seed layer for improving the growth of the Co-based Heusler alloys.\
In the second part of the present paper we report on multilayers prepared by combining thin layers of two different Heusler compounds and Heusler compounds with non magnetic metals. Multilayers with Heusler compounds have rarely been studied in the literature until now, we only know of publications on \[PtMnSb/NiMnSb\] multilayers [@art:Mancoff]. Our original intention to study Heusler-based multilayers was to search for an antiferromagnetic interlayer exchange coupling (IEC). Quantum interference models for the IEC suggest that it should exist in virtually any multilayer system combining ferromagnetic and non ferromagnetic metallic layers [@Bruno]. Experimentally, however, a prerequisite for the observation of the IEC is a high quality of the layered structure with flat interfaces. Our results to this end were negative until now. We could not find clear evidence for an antiferomagnetic IEC in the multilayer systems we report on in the next section. Instead, we use the multilayers here mainly as a tool for gaining insight into the magnetic properties of the Heusler alloys films in the limit of a very small thickness.
\[sec:level1\]Preparation and Experimental\
===========================================
Our thin films and multilayers were deposited by rf-sputtering using pure Ar at a pressure of $5\cdot10^{-3}$ mbar as sputter gas. The base pressure of the sputtering system was $5\cdot10^{-8}$ mbar, the sputtering rate was 0.04 nm/s for the Heusler compounds, 0.06 nm/s for Au and 0.03 nm/s for V. For the growth of pure Heusler alloy thin films the temperature of the substrates was $470^\circ$C, the multilayers were grown at a temperature of $300^\circ$C. A systematic change of the process parameters showed that these values gave the best structural results.\
Heusler alloy targets with 10 cm diameter have been made from single phase, stoichiometric ingots prepared by high frequency melting of the components in high purity graphite crucibles. The thin films of the present study were grown on a-plane sapphire substrates or MgO (100)-substrates which were carefully cleaned and ion beam etched prior to deposition.\
During the sputter deposition process of the multilayers the substrates were moved automatically between the two targets of the dual source discharge. After finishing 30 periods of the multilayers we deposited a 2 nm thick Au-cap layer at room temperature for protection against oxidation. We usually prepared series of 10 multilayers simultaneously within the same run with either the thickness of the Heusler compound or the thickness of the other metal varied. The thickness covered typically a range between 0.6 nm and 3 nm for each component. For preparing the constant layer thickness the substrate holder was rotated in the symmetric position above the target, for the preparation of the variable thickness we made use of the natural gradient of the deposition rate when the substrate holder is in an off-centric position.\
The stoichiometric composition of our thin films was controlled using quantitative electron microprobe analysis. For there is a small Si-deficiency (23 at.% Si instead of 25 at.%), probably caused by selective resputtering of Si, for we find some excess of Cu (52 at.% instead 50 at.%). For the other two Heusler phases of the present study the thin films preserve the stoichiometric composition of the targets to within the precision of the microprobe analysis of about 0.5 at.%.\
The structural characterization of all samples was carried out by a thin film 3-circle x-ray spectrometer using $Cu-K_\alpha$-radiation. The x-ray study combined small angle reflectivity, $\Theta-2\Theta$ Bragg scans and rocking scans with the scattering vector out of the film plane. For selected samples Bragg scans and rocking scans at glancing incidence with the scattering vector in the film plane were also taken. The determination of the saturation magnetization was performed by a commercial SQUID magnetometer (Quantum Design MPMS system) at a temperature of 5 K and at a field of 0.4 T, which is far above the coercive force for all samples under study here.
\[sec:level1\]Results and discussion\
=====================================
**\[sec:level2\] thin films**
-----------------------------
We first discuss the properties of thin films of the Heusler phase. In the bulk the Fm3m phase of this compound is not stable below 923 K but decomposes into the phases $\beta-Mn$, $\gamma-Cu_9Al_4$ and $Cu_3AlMn_2$ [@art:Soltys]. Interestingly we found, however, that single phase thin films can be prepared by sputtering on MgO and sapphire a-plane at $470^\circ$ C and are metallurgically stable even when annealed for a long time at this temperature. Thus the sputtering process and the epitaxial strain seems to establish stability conditions definitely different from the bulk. [**Fig.1**]{} shows an x-ray Bragg scan over the whole angular range of a film with a thickness of 100 nm grown on MgO (100). One observes only the Heusler (200) and (400)-peak indicating perfect epitaxial (100)-growth. The out-of-plane rocking width of the (200) Bragg peak was determined to be $0.16^\circ$. In the inset of Fig.1 we present the in-plane rocking scan of the Heusler (200) reflection exhibiting 4 peaks at a distance of $90^\circ$, as expected for a single crystalline layer. The \[010\] direction of the Heusler film is rotated by an angle of $45^\circ$ from the in-plane MgO-\[010\]-direction. An example of the growth of the -phase on $Al_2O_3$ a-plane is shown in [**Fig.2a**]{}. One observes a perfect out-of-plane (220)-texture of the Heusler phase with an out-of-plane rocking width of $0.8^\circ$ for the (220)-Bragg-peak. An in-plane rocking scan of the (220)-Bragg peak, however, reveals an in-plane polycrystalline structure.\
The thin films prepared on MgO and on sapphire a-plane at $470
^\circ$ C possess a flat morphology. As an example we show low angle x-ray reflectivity spectra of the -film in [**Fig.2b**]{}. One observes well defined thickness oscillations up to scattering angles of $2\Theta\approx 5^\circ$. From a simulation of the reflectivity spectrum using the Parratt formalism [@art:paratt54] we derive a total thickness of 108 nm and estimate a roughness parameter of 0.6 nm. Atomic force microscopic images of the surfaces also show a very flat surface morphology with a roughness of about 0.7 nm (rms).\
An important characterization of the metallurgical state of films is the degree of order between the sites A, B and X of the Heusler unit cell. In polycrystalline, bulk material the relative intensity of the superstructure Bragg reflection (111) is conveniently used to determine the order parameter S for the site order between the B-(Mn) and X-(Al) positions, S=1 defining perfect order ($L2_1$- structure) and S=0 defining complete site disorder (B2-structure)[@art:Bacon]. Unfortunately for our epitaxial (100) or (110)-films the (111)-Bragg peak is not accessible by our triple axis x-ray spectrometer. Qualitatively the degree of site disorder can be deduced from the value ferromagnetic saturation magnetization [@art:Robinson]. single crystals with perfect site order $S\approx1$ have a saturation magnetization $M_s=98$ emu/g corresponding to a magnetic moment of about $4.2~\mu_B/Mn-atom$, B2-type disorder leads to a decrease of $M_{s}$, since Mn-spins on the X-position do not couple ferromagnetically to the Mn-spins on the B-position. in the completely disordered B2-state exhibits spin glass order with a very low value of the magnetization [@art:Taylor]. For the single crystalline film on MgO we get $M_s=40~emu/g$ pointing towards a substantial degree of site disorder. For the film prepared on a-plane $Al_2O_3$ we get $M_s=62~emu/g$, this value comes closer to the bulk value for $M_s$. The structural parameters and the saturation magnetization for the phase are summarized in [**Table 1**]{}. Note that the reduction of the moment correlates with a definite decrease of the lattice parameter.
**\[sec:level2\] , and thin films**
------------------------------------
The , and halfmetallic Heusler thin films grown directly on MgO or Al$_2$O$_3$ are polycrystalline and have a bad structural quality and a low value for the saturation magnetization. Only when using suitable metallic seed layers with a typical thickness of about 2 nm we could achieve textured growth and good structural quality. For the phase we found that the optimum seed layer for the growth on sapphire a-plane is Au with a lattice parameter mismatch of about 1%. V and seedlayers can also be used. In [**Fig.3**]{} we show an out-of-plane Bragg-scan of a -film grown on an Au seed layer. One observes only the (220)- and the (440)-Heusler-Bragg-peak, evidencing pure (110)-texture. The rocking width of the (220) Heusler Bragg-peak is about 3 i.e. it is definitely larger than obtained for the layers (see Table 1). The phase with similar structural quality can be grown on V and Cr seedlayers, Cr giving a slightly better growth quality since it has a lattice mismatch of 0.8% only. For the -phase V, Au and Cr-seed layers give comparably good structural quality. A summary of these results is given in Table 1. For all three Co-based Heusler compounds the thin films have a very flat surface morphology. As one representative example we show a small angle x-ray reflectivity scan of the film grown on a V-seedlayer in [**Fig.4**]{}. One observes well defined finite thickness oscillations from the total layer superimposed by an oscillation from the V-seedlayer. From a fit using the Parrat formalism we estimate a roughness of about 0.5 nm for the interfaces. We also have tested systematically the growth of the Co-based Heusler phases on MgO (100) substrates. The films grown on the bare MgO-surface are polycrystalline. When using metallic seedlayers one can induce reasonable quality out-of-plane (100)-textured growth, however with a definitely larger mosaicity than for the growth on sapphire a-plane, as evidenced by the increased rocking width of the Bragg peaks (see Table 1). Contrary to the case of the phase we could not achieve epitaxial growth for the Co-based Heusler alloys, the structure in-plane is always polycrystalline with a broad distribution of the (220) or (200) Bragg peak intensity for an in-plane rocking scan.\
\
An important criterion for the magnetic quality of the thin films is the value of the ferromagnetic saturation magnetization $M_s$ which we have included in Table 1. The values for $M_s$ for the Co-based Heusler alloy thin films are close to the bulk values and for the and the -phase nearly coincide with them. This indicates the absence of sizable B2-type of site disorder, consistent with the fact that for these phases the ordered $L2_1$-type phase is very stable [@art:Webster]. Only for the -thin film we observe a definitely smaller value of the magnetization in the film than in the bulk, which we would attribute to the deviation from the ideal stoichiometry for this film.\
The standard growth temperature we apply for the growth of the films in Table 1 was 470 C. In thin film heterostructures the maximum temperature which is allowed for avoiding strong interdiffusion of the components at the interfaces is often definitely lower. Thus it is essential to know the change of site disorder and the sample quality when applying lower substrate temperatures. We prepared series of films of the Heusler alloys at lower substrate temperatures down to T=100 C. We found that the structural quality, as judged from the Bragg reflection intensity, is only slightly worse when preparing at 300C, at still lower preparation temperatures, however, there is a definite deterioration of the crystal quality. Simultaneously the ferromagnetic saturation magnetization is strongly reduced for the phase [**(Fig.5)**]{} and moderately for the phase and the phase . This indicates an increasing degree of site disorder when lowering the preparation temperature.\
\[sec:level2\]Multilayers with Heusler alloys
---------------------------------------------
In this section we want to elucidate the possibility to grow multilayers based on the , and the compounds. In order to avoid excessive interdiffusion at the interfaces the substrate temperature during the preparation of the multilaysers had to be limited to 300 C, although at this temperature the ferromagnetic saturation magnetization of the Heusler compounds is already definitely reduced (see Fig.5). Actually at 300 C multilayers with high structural quality of all these phases can be grown on sapphire a-plane by combining them with fcc Au. [**[Fig.6a]{}**]{} shows a small angle x-ray reflectivity scan of a multilayer with a nominal thickness, as calculated from the sputtering rate, of 3 nm for Au and combined of 30 periods. Above the critical angle for total reflection $\Theta_c$ the multilayer structure gives rise to superlattice reflections superimposed on the Fresnel-reflectivity. We observe superlattice reflections up to 4th order, revealing a good interface quality and low fluctuations of the layer thickness. From the reflectivity peak of order l at the angle $\Theta_{l}$ one can calculate the superlattice periodicity $\Lambda$ by using the relation [@art:zabel90]
$$\begin{aligned}
\Lambda&=&l\cdot\lambda/[2(\sqrt{\Theta_{l}^{2}-\Theta_{c}^{2}})]\end{aligned}$$
From a fit we get $\Lambda=5.7$ nm in good agreement with the nominal thickness. From simulations of the reflectivity curves using the Parratt formalism [@art:paratt54] we derive an interface roughness of about 0.6 nm. The out-of-plane Bragg scan [**(Fig.6b)**]{} close to the (220)/(111) fundamental Bragg reflection reveals that the multilayer possesses a pure (110) out-of-plane texture for , and (111) texture for the Au-layers. Besides the fundamental Bragg peak from the average lattice, the multilayer exhibits a rich satellite structure caused by the chemical modulation. Satellites up to the order l=+3 and l=-4 can be resolved, proving coherently grown superstructures in the growth direction. The position of the satellite peaks give the superstucture periodicity from the separation $\Delta(2\Theta)$ of the satellites of order l from the fundamental Bragg peak [@art:zabel90]:
$$\begin{aligned}
\Lambda=\lambda/{[2\cdot l\Delta(\Theta)\cdot \cos(\Theta)]}\end{aligned}$$
From this relation we get a superlattice period of 5.8 nm, in good agreement with the value derived from the small angle x-ray reflectivity. From the width of the satellite peaks at half maximum (FWHM) $\Delta(2\Theta)$ we can derive the out-of-plane coherence length of the superstructure $D_{coh}$ using the Scherrer equation
$$\begin{aligned}
D_{coh}=\lambda/[\Delta(2\Theta)\cdot \cos(\Theta)]\end{aligned}$$
We estimate $D_{coh}=60$ nm i.e. comprising about 10 superlattice periods. The fundamental Bragg peak in [**[Fig.6b]{}**]{} is positioned at $2\Theta=40.5^\circ$ i.e. at the middle position between the Au (111)-Bragg peak at $2\Theta=38.5^\circ$ and the (220) peak at $2\Theta=42.5^\circ$, as expected for a coherently strained superlattice. Multilayers of similar hight quality can also be grown combining the Heusler compounds and with Au.\
In [**Table 2**]{} we summarize the important parameters characterizing the different multilayers with the Heusler compounds we have grown successfully until now. As revealed by in-plane rocking scans all samples exhibit a broad distribution of Bragg peaks in-plane and thus in are polycrystalline multilayers rather than superlattices.\
Multilayers combining the Co-based Heusler alloys with V-interlayers can also be grown. They possess sharp interfaces, however the out-of-plane crystalline order is definitely worse than that we have obtained for the multilayers with Au (see Table 2). We also have grown multilayers combining two different Heusler phases. In [**Fig.7a**]{} we present the small angle reflectivity scan and the large angle Bragg scan of the multilayer as an example. In the reflectivity one finds sharp superstructure peaks up to the 4th order indicating a good quality of the layered structure with sharp interfaces. From a fit of the reflectivity curve we determined a superlattice periodicity $\Lambda=6.3$ nm. The Bragg scan close to the (220)-peak exhibits one fundamental superlattice reflection at $2\Theta=43.2^\circ$ and two weak satellite peaks giving a superlattice periodicity of 6.4 nm. From the FWHM of the satellite peaks we estimate an out-of-plane structural coherence length $D_{coh}$ of about 20 nm thus the superstructure in the growth direction is coherent over about 3 periods.\
Coming to the magnetic characterization of the multilayers, we have measured the ferromagnetic saturation magnetization at 5 K for all multilayers and summarized the results in Table 2. As discussed above, deviations of $M_s$ from the ideal bulk value can be taken as an indication of site disorder of the Heusler alloys. By comparison with the bulk value of the magnetization (see Table 1) one finds that most of the $M_s$ values of the multilayers are definitely below the bulk $M_{so} $. This partly can be attributed to the lower preparation temperature of the multilayers (see Fig.5). For the multilayer the magnetization is only about 12% of the bulk value, consistent with a strongly disordered B2-type of structure and spin glass magnetic order. The and the multilayers in Table 2 have a relative magnetization value $M_{s}/M_{0}>1$, where one should note that $M_{0}$ refers to the saturation magnetization of the Co-Heusler alloy alone. This clearly shows that the -layers in the multilayers posses a substantial ferromagnetic magnetization definitely larger than that observed for the single thin film prepared at the same temperature. The reduced values of the saturation magnetization for Co-based Heusler multilayers in combinatin with V and Au in Table 2 suggests an intermixing at the interfaces or an increased degree of site disorder.\
More detailed insight into the metallurgical state and magnetism at the interfaces can be gained by varying the thickness of the Heusler layers in the multilayers. [**Fig.8**]{} shows how the magnetic saturation magnetization in the multilayers changes when decreasing the thickness of the Heusler layers while keeping the thickness of the non magnetic layers constant at 3 nm. The ferromagnetic saturation magnetization breaks down for a thickness of typically 1.5 nm in all systems. This result suggests that at the interfaces of the multilayers there exists an intermediate layer of about 0.7 nm thickness which is metallurgically strongly disordered and not ferromagnetic. We have recently shown in a separate investigation [@Westerholt] that the interfaces in \[/Au\] multilayers develop spin glass order at low temperatures leading to ferromagnetic hysteresis loops with an unidirectional exchange anisotropy (so called exchange bias effect). This result gives clear evidence for the existence of non ferromagnetic interfaces. Quantitatively the decrease of the saturation magnetization depicted in Fig.8 depends on the combination of both metals, the multilayer \[/V\] developing the highest magnetization values in the thickness range above 2 nm. In comparison the multilayer \[/Au\] has a rather low value of the saturation magnetization in this thickness range.
\[sec:level1\]Summary and conclusions\
======================================
In summary, we have shown that the Heusler phase can be grown with high structural quality directly on MgO (100) and sapphire a-plane. For the half metallic Co-based Heusler compounds , and it is possible to grow thin films with flat surfaces, pure out-of-plane (110) texture and the desired ordered $L2_1$ structure by using metallic seedlayers. Principally this makes these compounds possible candidates for applications in spin transport devices.\
A crucial step in this direction is the test of the Co-based Heusler compounds in the limit of very thin films and in combination with other metallic layers. We have shown that for several combinations of the Heusler compounds and nonmagnetic metals high quality, coherent multilayers can be grown down to a thickness range of 1 nm for the Heusler phase. The magnetic measurements however reveal that, depending of the specific combination of materials and the thickness of the Heusler alloy layers, the saturation magnetization is strongly lowered compared to the bulk value. Eventually, for a thickness below typically about 1.5 nm, the Heusler layers are no longer ferromagnetic. This result indicates that typically several monolayers of the Heusler compounds at the interfaces are not ferromagnetic, probably caused by alloying and (or) strong site disorder. This is not unexpected, since an alloying at the interfaces can hardly be avoided in real thin film systems and the chemical conditions for the phase formations of a ternary compound at the interfaces are complex and virtually unknown.\
We finally come to the question concerning the potential of the Co-based Heusler alloys in the field of magnetoelectronics in the light of the results presented here. The main problem will be to preserve the full spin polarization predicted for the perfectly ordered Heusler structure in very thin layers of real devices. We have shown that for the preparation temperatures allowed in thin film heterostructures the formation of site disorder cannot be completely avoided in the Co-based Heusler alloys. Site disorder in the interior of the Heusler film is a critical factor, since it must be expected that the full spin polarization is lost in disordered Heusler alloys [@art:ishida2-98]. The question, to what extend some site disorder is tolerable, i.e. leaves at least a high value for the spin polarization, cannot be answered quantitatively at the moment, since corresponding band structure calculations have not been published yet. The existence of non ferromagnetic interfaces, which seem to be present in all combinations of the Co-based Heusler alloys and other metals which we have studied until now, causes a second problem, which might be even more detrimental for the performance of spin transport devices. Necessarily the spin polarization at the Fermi level will completely vanish in a non ferromagnetic interlayer. Since in GMR with the current in the plane (cip-geometry) the spin dependent electron scattering at the interfaces is dominating [@art:Dieny], non ferromagnetic interfaces are expected to reduce the GMR-value strongly. This is in accord with our first results of magnetoresistance measurements for spin valve systems using the Co-based Heusler alloys, which reveal very small values for the GMR effect [@Bergmann]. Possibly one can overcome this problem by using the GMR geometry with the current perpendicular to the plane (cpp-geometrty). In this geometry one can use much larger thicknesses of the ferromagnetic layers and the spin asymmetry of the electron scattering in the interior of the ferromagnetic layers gives an important contribution to the GMR [@art:Gijs]. However, concerning technical applications the cpp-geometry seems not very useful. The alternative choice would be to search for other material combinations or preparation methods with less interdiffusion at the interfaces.
The authors thank the DFG for financial support of this work within the SFB 491, P. Stauche for the preparation of the alloy targets and S. Erdt-Böhm for running the sputtering equipment.
[99]{}
J. Park, E. Vescovo, E. Kim, C. Kwon, R. Ramesh, T. Venkatesan, Nature 392 (1998) 794.
J. Moodera, R. Kinder, L, T. Wong, R. Meservey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1998) 3273.
B. Dieny, J. Magn. Magn. Mat. 136 (1994) 335.
K. Schwarz, J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 16 (1986) 7934.
Ziebeck, Webster, Landolt-Börnstein New Series III/19c, Springer-Verlag, 1988.
R. de Groot, P. van Engen, Phys. Rev. Letters 50 (1983) 2024.
S. Ishida, T. Masaki, S. Fujii, S. Asano, Physica B 245 (1998) 1.
S. Ishida, S. Fujii, S. Kashiwagi, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 64 (1995) 2152.
R. Kabani, M. Terada, A. Roshko, J. Moodera, J. Appl. Phys. 67 (1990) 4898.
J. Caballero, A. Reilly, Y. Hao, J. Bass, W. Pratt, F. Petroff, J. Childress, J. Magn. Magn. Mat. 55 (1999) 198.
M. Kautzky, F. Mancoff, J. Bobo, P. Johnson, R. White, B. Clemens, J. Appl. Phys. 81 (1997) 4026.
D. Orgassa, H. Fujiwara, T. C. Schulthess, W. H. Butler, Phys. Rev B 60 (1999) 13237
M. Raphael, B. Ravel, M. Willard, S. Cheng, D. Das, R. Stout, K. Bussmann, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79 (2001) 4396.
T. Ambrose, J. Krebs, G. Prinz, J. Appl. Phys. 89 (2001) 7522.
U. Geiersbach, A. Bergmann, K. Westerholt, J. Magn. Magn. Mat. 240 (2002) 546.
J. Kübler, A. Williams, C. Sommers, Phys. Rev. B 28 (1983) 1745.
F. B. Mancoff, J. Bobo, O. Richter, J. Mater. Res. 14 (1999) 1560.
P. Bruno, Europhys. Lett. (1993) 615
J. Soltys, Acta. Phys. Pol. A 56 (1979) 227.
L. Paratt, Phys. Rev. 95 (1954) 359.
G. Bacon, J. Plant, J. Phys. F: Metal Physics 1 (1971) 524.
J. Robinson, P. McCormick, R. Street, J. Phys. Condens. Matt. 7 (1995) 4259.
R. Taylor, C. Tsuei, Sol. St. Comm. 41 (1982) 503.
P. Webster, J. Phys. Chem. Sol. 32 (1971) 1221.
H. Zabel, Advances in Sol. St. Phys. 30 (1990) 197.
K. Westerholt, U. Geiersbach and A. Bergmann, appears in J. Magn. Magn. Mat. (2002)
A. Bergmann and K. Westerholt, in preparation
M. Gijs, G. Bauer, Advances in Physics 46 (1997) 286.
\[sec:level1\]Figure Captions\
==============================
[**Fig.1**]{}\
Out-of-plane x-ray Bragg-scan of a film on MgO(100). The inset shows the in-plane rocking scan of the Heusler (200) peak.\
[**Fig.2**]{}\
(a)Out-of-plane Bragg-scan of a film grown directly on Al$_{2}$O$_{3}$ and (b) low angle x-ray reflectivity spectrum of the same film.\
[**Fig.3**]{}\
Out-of-plane Bragg-scan of a film grown on an Au seed layer.\
[**Fig.4**]{}\
Small angle x-ray reflectivity scan or a film on Al$_{2}$O$_{3}$ with a V-seedlayer\
[**Fig.5**]{}\
Saturation magnetization of , and versus the substrate temperature during preparation.\
[**Fig.6**]{}\
(a) Small angle x-ray reflectivity scan of a multilayer with a nominal thickness of 3 nm for Au and and (b) out-of-plane Bragg scan of the same multilayer. The numbers in the figure denote the order of the superlattice reflections and the order of the sattelites\
[**Fig.7**]{}\
(a) Small angle reflectivity scan of a multilayer and (b) large angle Bragg-scan for the same sample.\
[**Fig.8**]{}\
Ferromagnetic saturation magnetization of multilayers measured at 5 K as a function of the thickness of the Co-Heusler layers. The thickness of the other layer is kept constant at 3 nm.\
-------------- ----------- ---------------------------- ------------- ----------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
**Phase** **Prep.** **Substr./seed layer** **Texture** [**Rocking**]{}
**temp.** **** **width(220)**-
**(C)** **peak (**)
**bulk** **film** **bulk** **film**
Cu$_{2}$MnAl 470 Al$_{2}$O$_{3}$ a-plane (110) 0.8 0.5962 0.5907 98 62
Cu$_{2}$MnAl 470 MgO (100) (100) 0.16 0.5922 40
Co$_{2}$MnSi 470 Al$_{2}$O$_{3}$ a-plane/Cr (110) 4 0.5654 0.5688 138 98
Co$_{2}$MnSi 470 MgO (100)/Cr (100) 10 0.5670 100
Co$_{2}$MnGe 470 Al$_{2}$O$_{3}$ a-plane/V (110) 3 0.5743 0.5766 111 103
Co$_{2}$MnGe 470 MgO (100)/V (100) 5 0.5803 107
Co$_{2}$MnSn 470 Al$_{2}$O$_{3}$ a-plane/Au (110) 3 0.6000 0.6003 91 87
Co$_{2}$MnSn 470 MgO (100)/Au (100) 6 0.6011 80
-------------- ----------- ---------------------------- ------------- ----------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
: Structural parameters and saturation magnetization measured at 5 K for the Heusler films grown on Al$_{2}$O$_{3}$ a-plane or MgO (100) \[tab1\]
---------------- ------------- ---------------- ---------------- -------------------- ----------------------- -- -- --
**Multilayer** **Texture** **Period** **Coherence** **Lattice-** [**$M_{s}/M_{0}$**]{}
**length(nm)** **length(nm)** **parameter (nm)**
**out-of-plane**
(110)/(111) 5.7 60 0.610 / 0.400 0.12
(110) 6.0 20 0.598 / 0.598 1.45
(110) 6.4 18 0.588 / 0.588 1.09
(110)/(111) 5.9 50 0.615 / 0.400 0.68
(110) 6.3 30 0.596 / 0.299 0.71
(110) 6.2 35 0.584 / 0.292 0.70
(110)/(111) 5.9 70 0.620 / 0.409 0.47
---------------- ------------- ---------------- ---------------- -------------------- ----------------------- -- -- --
: Structural parameters of the Heusler multilayers grown on Al$_{2}$O$_{3}$ a-plane and the relative saturation magnetization measured at 5 K. $M_{0}$ denotes the saturation magnetization of the bulk Co-Heusler compounds (see Table 1)
![\[Fig1\]](Fig1){width="0.7\linewidth"}
![ \[Fig3\]](Fig3){width="0.7\linewidth"}
![ \[Fig4\]](Fig4){width="0.7\linewidth"}
![ \[Fig5\]](Fig5){width="0.7\linewidth"}
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
author:
- Takashi Hotta
title: 'Two-channel Kondo Effect Emerging from Nd Ions'
---
It is one of the fascinating problems in the modern condensed matter physics to realize an exotic new quantum state in strongly correlated electron systems. Among them, concerning the non-Fermi liquid state, the two-channel Kondo effect has been discussed for a long time as it is a confirmed route to arrive at the non-Fermi liquid ground state. Coqblin and Schrieffer derived exchange interactions from the multiorbital Anderson model.[@Coqblin] Then, the concept of the multichannel Kondo effect was developed on the basis of such exchange interactions,[@Nozieres] as a potential source of non-Fermi liquid phenomena. Moreover, such non-Fermi liquid properties were pointed out in a two-impurity Kondo system.[@Jones1; @Jones2]
Concerning the reality of two-channel Kondo phenomena, Cox pointed out the existence of two screening channels in the case of quadrupole degrees of freedom in a cubic U compound with a $\Gamma_3$ non-Kramers doublet ground state.[@Cox1; @Cox2] As Cox’s idea attracted significant attention, a large number of works were published on this topic and the understanding on the two-channel Kondo phenomena was considerably promoted. For instance, the roles of crystalline electric field (CEF) potentials were vigorously discussed. [@Koga1; @Koga2; @Kusunose1; @Kusunose2; @OSakai; @Koga3; @Koga4; @Miyake1; @Miyake2; @Koga5; @Miyake3; @Miyake4] In order to observe the two-channel Kondo effect, first, experiments were performed in cubic U compounds and then Pr compounds with a $\Gamma_3$ non-Kramers doublet ground state were extensively investigated. Recently, in PrT$_2$X$_{20}$ compounds,[@Review] there were significant advances to grasp signs of non-Fermi liquid behavior. [@Sakai; @Onimaru1; @Onimaru2; @Higashinaka] Theoretical research on this issue was also performed.[@Tsuruta; @Kusunose3]
At present, research on the two-channel Kondo phenomena is nearly equivalent to that on the quadrupole two-channel Kondo effect. However, the magnetic two-channel Kondo effect should also be discussed in actual materials, when we come back to the original idea of Noziéres and Blandin. In addition, when we try to observe the two-channel Kondo effect, the number of candidate materials is limited; thus, it is necessary to develop Pr compounds with a $\Gamma_3$ non-Kramers doublet ground state. We believe that it is meaningful to push forward the research frontier of the two-channel Kondo physics to other rare-earth compounds.
In this study, we suggest that Nd compounds can provide a new stage of two-channel Kondo phenomena. We numerically analyze a seven-orbital impurity Anderson model hybridized with $\Gamma_8$ conduction electrons for the case with three local $f$ electrons corresponding to a Nd$^{3+}$ ion. Then, we find a residual entropy of $0.5 \log 2$ as a clear signal of the two-channel Kondo effect, for the case of the local $\Gamma_6$ ground state. By analyzing the $\Gamma_6$ state on the basis of the $j$-$j$ coupling scheme, we propose an extended $s$-$d$ model to explain the present result. Finally, we provide a few comments on the candidate materials to detect the two-channel Kondo effect.
First, we define the local $f$-electron Hamiltonian as $$\label{Hloc}
\begin{split}
H_{\rm loc} &=\sum_{m_1 \sim m_4}\sum_{\sigma,\sigma'}
I_{m_1m_2,m_3m_4}
f_{m_1\sigma}^{\dag}f_{m_2\sigma'}^{\dag}
f_{m_3\sigma'}f_{m_4\sigma}\\
&+ \lambda \sum_{m,\sigma,m',\sigma'}
\zeta_{m,\sigma;m',\sigma'} f_{m\sigma}^{\dag}f_{m'\sigma'}\\
&+ \sum_{m,m',\sigma} B_{m,m'}
f_{m \sigma}^{\dag} f_{m' \sigma}
+E_f n,
\end{split}$$ where $f_{m\sigma}$ is the annihilation operator for a local $f$ electron with spin $\sigma$ and $z$-component $m$ of angular momentum $\ell=3$, $\sigma=+1$ ($-1$) for up (down) spin, $I$ indicates Coulomb interactions, $\lambda$ is the spin-orbit coupling, $B_{m,m'}$ denotes the CEF potentials, $E_f$ is the $f$-electron level, and $n$ denotes the local $f$-electron number.
The Coulomb interaction $I$ is expressed as $$I_{m_1m_2,m_3m_4} = \sum_{k=0}^{6} F^k c_k(m_1,m_4)c_k(m_2,m_3),$$ where $F^k$ indicates the Slater-Condon parameter and $c_k$ is the Gaunt coefficient.[@Slater] The sum is limited by the Wigner-Eckart theorem to $k=0$, $2$, $4$, and $6$. Although the Slater-Condon parameters of a material should be determined from experimental results, here, we set the ratio as $$F^0/10=F^2/5=F^4/3=F^6=U,$$ where $U$ is the Hund rule interaction among $f$ orbitals.
Each matrix element of $\zeta$ is given by $$\begin{split}
\zeta_{m,\sigma;m,\sigma}&=m\sigma/2,\\
\zeta_{m+\sigma,-\sigma;m,\sigma}&=\sqrt{\ell(\ell+1)-m(m+\sigma)}/2,
\end{split}$$ and zero for other cases. The CEF potentials for $f$ electrons from ligand ions are given in the table of Hutchings for the angular momentum $\ell=3$.[@Hutchings] For a cubic structure with $O_{\rm h}$ symmetry, $B_{m,m'}$ is expressed by two CEF parameters, $B_4^0$ and $B_6^0$, as $$\begin{split}
B_{3,3}&=B_{-3,-3}=180B_4^0+180B_6^0, \\
B_{2,2}&=B_{-2,-2}=-420B_4^0-1080B_6^0, \\
B_{1,1}&=B_{-1,-1}=60B_4^0+2700B_6^0, \\
B_{0,0}&=360B_4^0-3600B_6^0, \\
B_{3,-1}&=B_{-3,1}=60\sqrt{15}(B_4^0-21B_6^0),\\
B_{2,-2}&=300B_4^0+7560B_6^0.
\end{split}$$ Note the relation $B_{m,m'}=B_{m',m}$. Following the traditional notation,[@LLW] we define $B_4^0$ and $B_6^0$ as $$B_4^0=Wx/F(4),~B_6^0=W(1-|x|)/F(6),$$ where $x$ specifies the CEF scheme for the $O_{\rm h}$ point group, while $W$ determines the energy scale for the CEF potential. We choose $F(4)=15$ and $F(6)=180$ for $\ell=3$.[@Hutchings]
Now, we consider the case of $n=3$ by appropriately adjusting the value of $E_f$. As $U$ denotes the magnitude of the Hund rule interaction among $f$ orbitals, it is reasonable to set $U=1$ eV. The magnitude of $\lambda$ varies between 0.077 and 0.36 eV depending on the type of lanthanide ions. For a Nd$^{3+}$ ion, $\lambda$ is $870-885$ cm$^{-1}$.[@Carnall] Thus, we set $\lambda=0.11$ eV. Finally, the magnitude of $W$ is typically of the order of millielectronvolts, although it depends on the material. Here, we simply set $|W|=10^{-3}$ eV.
{width="8.0truecm"}
In Fig. 1, we depict curves of ten low-lying eigenenergies of $H_{\rm loc}$ for $n=3$ since the ground-state multiplet for $W=0$ is characterized by $J=9/2$, where $J$ denotes the total angular momentum of multi-$f$-electron state. We appropriately shift the origin of the energy to show all the curves in the present energy range. We emphasize that the results are almost the same as those of the $LS$ coupling scheme.[@LLW] For the case of $W>0$, we find the $\Gamma_8^{(1)}$ ground state for $x \le -0.5$, while the $\Gamma_6$ ground state is observed for $x \ge -0.5$. However, for $W<0$, the $\Gamma_6$ ground state appears only in the vicinity of $x=-1.0$. For the wide range of $-0.9<x \le 1$, we obtain another $\Gamma_8^{(2)}$ ground state.
Now, we include $\Gamma_8$ conduction bands hybridized with localized $f$ electrons. For the purpose, it is convenient to transform the $f$-electron basis in $H_{\rm loc}$ from $(m, \sigma)$ to $(j, \mu, \tau)$, where $j$ denotes the total angular momentum of one $f$-electron state, $\mu$ indicates the irreducible representation of $O_{\rm h}$ point group, and $\tau$ denotes the pseudo-spin to distinguish the Kramers degenerate state. For $j=7/2$ octet, we have two doublets ($\Gamma_6$ and $\Gamma_7$) and one quartet ($\Gamma_8$), while for $j=5/2$ sextet, we obtain one doublet ($\Gamma_7$) and one quartet ($\Gamma_8$). In the present case, we consider the hybridization between $\Gamma_8$ conduction electrons and the $\Gamma_8$ quartet of $j=5/2$.
Then, the seven-orbital Anderson model is expressed as $$H \!=\! \! \sum_{\mib{k},\mu,\tau} \! \varepsilon_{\mib{k}}
c_{\mib{k}\mu\tau}^{\dag} c_{\mib{k}\mu\tau}
\! +\! \! \sum_{\mib{k},\mu,\tau} \! V(c_{\mib{k}\mu\tau}^{\dag}\tilde{f}_{5/2\mu\tau}+{\rm h.c.})
\! +\! \tilde{H}_{\rm loc},$$ where $\varepsilon_{\mib{k}}$ is the dispersion of a conduction electron with wave vector $\mib{k}$, $c_{\mib{k}\mu\tau}$ is the annihilation operator of a $\Gamma_8$ conduction electron, $\mu$ (=$\alpha$ and $\beta$) distinguishes the $\Gamma_8$ quartet, $\tau$ (=$\uparrow$ and $\downarrow$) is the pseudo-spin, ${\tilde f}_{j\mu\tau}$ is the annihilation operator of a localized $f$ electron expressed by the bases of $(j, \mu, \tau)$, $V$ is the hybridization between conduction and localized electrons, and $\tilde{H}_{\rm loc}$ is obtained from $H_{\rm loc}$ by the transformation of the $f$-electron basis from $(m, \sigma)$ to $(j, \mu, \tau)$.
{width="8.0truecm"}
In this study, we analyze the model by employing a numerical renormalization group (NRG) method.[@NRG1; @NRG2] We introduce a cut-off $\Lambda$ for the logarithmic discretization of the conduction band. Owing to the limitation of computer resources, we keep $M$ low-energy states. Here, we use $\Lambda=5$ and $M=4,000$. In the following calculations, the energy unit is $D$, which is a half of the conduction band width. Namely, we set $D=U=1$ eV in this calculation. In the NRG calculation, the temperature $T$ is defined as $T=\Lambda^{-(N-1)/2}$ in the present energy unit, where $N$ is the number of renormalization steps.
In Fig. 2(a), we show the contour color map of the entropy for $W=10^{-3}$ and $V=0.75$. To visualize precisely the behavior of entropy, we define the color of the entropy between $0$ and $1.5$, as shown in the right color bar. We immediately notice that an entropy of $\log 2$ (green region) appears at low temperatures for $-1.0<x < -0.4$, while an entropy of $0.5\log 2$ (yellow region) is found for $-0.4<x<1.0$. The region with an entropy of $0.5\log 2$ almost corresponds to that of the $\Gamma_6$ ground state in comparison with Fig. 1, although we find a small difference between them around $x \sim 0.5$. The residual entropies, $0.5\log 2$ and $\log 2$, are eventually released at extremely low temperatures in the numerical calculations. Approximately at $x=-0.5$, the release of an entropy of $\log 2$ seems to occur at relatively high temperatures. This is considered to be related with the accidental degeneracy of $\Gamma_6$ and $\Gamma_8^{(1)}$ states. In any case, the details on the entropy behavior at low temperatures will be discussed elsewhere in the future.
In Fig. 2(b), we show the contour color map of the entropy for $W=-10^{-3}$ and $V=0.75$. Again, we find a residual entropy of $0.5\log 2$ in the vicinity of $x=-1.0$, just corresponding to the region of the $\Gamma_6$ ground state for $W<0$, as observed in Fig. 1. For $-0.9<x<1$, the CEF ground state is $\Gamma_8^{(2)}$, but depending on the excited states, the entropy behavior is different. We find the singlet ground state between $-0.5 < x <0.5$, while a residual entropy of $\log 2$ appears for $-0.9 < x < -0.5$ and $0.5<x<1$. For the case of the $\Gamma_8^{(2)}$ ground state, we do not find a residual entropy of $0.5 \log 2$ even at a certain point of $x$. Thus, from Figs. 2(a) and 2(b), we conclude that a residual entropy of $0.5\log 2$ appears for the case of the $\Gamma_6$ ground state for $f^3$ systems. The Kondo effect for the case of the $\Gamma_8^{(2)}$ ground state is considered to be related to that in the model with an impurity spin hybridized with conduction electrons with spin $3/2$.[@Cox3; @Hattori] The point will be also discussed elsewhere in the future.
{width="8.0truecm"}
Next we discuss the $V$ dependence of the entropy. In Fig. 3, we show the contour color map of the entropy on the $(V,T)$ plane for $x=0.25$ and $W=10^{-3}$ with the $\Gamma_6$ local ground state. We emphasize that the $0.5\log 2$ entropy does not appear only at a certain value of $V$, but it can be observed in the wide region of $V$ such as $0.6 < V < 0.9$ in the present temperature range. This behavior is different from that in the non-Fermi liquid state because of the competition between the CEF and Kondo-Yosida singlets for $f^2$ systems.[@Miyake1; @Miyake3; @Miyake4] Additionally, the two-channel Kondo effect appears for relatively large values of $V$ in the energy scale of $U=D=1$ eV.
We believe that the two-channel Kondo effect is confirmed to occur for the case of $n=3$ with the local $\Gamma_6$ ground state in the NRG calculation for the seven-orbital Anderson model. However, it is difficult to describe the electronic state from a microscopic viewpoint as all $f$ orbitals are included in the present calculations. Thus, it is desirable to consider the effective model including only $j=5/2$ states to grasp the essential point of the electronic states.[@Hotta1] For the purpose, we exploit the $j$-$j$ coupling scheme to derive the effective potentials and interactions among $j=5/2$ states by the perturbation expansion in terms of $1/\lambda$.[@Hotta2] Then, we perform the NRG calculations for the three-orbital Anderson model hybridized with $\Gamma_8$ conduction bands by using the same parameters as those in Fig. 2(a). Then, we obtain almost the same contour map of entropy on the $(x,T)$ plane (not shown here) by using the $j$-$j$ coupling scheme with the effective interactions.
{width="8.0truecm"}
Now we consider the local $\Gamma_6$ state on the basis of the $j$-$j$ coupling scheme. After some algebraic calculations, we express $\Gamma_6$ states by using the three spins on $\Gamma_7$ and $\Gamma_8$ orbitals, as schematically shown in Fig. 4. Namely, we obtain [@Kubo] $$\begin{split}
|\Gamma_6, \uparrow \rangle &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}
\left( {\tilde f}^{\dag}_{5/2 \alpha \uparrow} |S_{78\beta}\rangle
-{\tilde f}^{\dag}_{5/2 \beta \uparrow} |S_{78\alpha}\rangle \right),\\
|\Gamma_6, \downarrow \rangle &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}
\left( -{\tilde f}^{\dag}_{5/2 \alpha \downarrow} |S_{78\beta}\rangle
+{\tilde f}^{\dag}_{5/2 \beta \downarrow} |S_{78\alpha}\rangle \right),
\end{split}$$ where $|S_{78\mu}\rangle$ denotes the singlet state, given by $$|S_{78\mu}\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}
\left( {\tilde f}^{\dag}_{5/2 \gamma \uparrow}{\tilde f}^{\dag}_{5/2 \mu \downarrow}
-{\tilde f}^{\dag}_{5/2 \gamma \downarrow}{\tilde f}^{\dag}_{5/2 \mu \uparrow}
\right) |0\rangle.$$ Here, ${\tilde f}_{5/2\gamma\tau}$ is the annihilation operator of $\Gamma_7$ electron and $|0\rangle$ denotes the vacuum. The main component of the $\Gamma_3$ non-Kramers doublet state of $n=2$ is expressed by $|S_{78\alpha}\rangle$ and $|S_{78\beta}\rangle$. Thus, the $\Gamma_6$ states of $n=3$ are obtained by the addition of one $\Gamma_8$ electron to $\Gamma_3$ states of $n=2$. We intuitively understand that the pseudo-spin properties of $\Gamma_6$ originate from those of $\Gamma_8$ electrons.
On the basis of local $\Gamma_6$ states composed of the three pseudo-spins, we obtain an extended $s$-$d$ model, given by $$H \!=\! \! \! \sum_{\mib{k},\mu,\tau} \! \! \varepsilon_{\mib{k}}
c_{\mib{k}\mu\tau}^{\dag} c_{\mib{k}\mu\tau}
\! +\! J_1 \! \! \! \sum_{\mu=\alpha,\beta} \! \! \mib{s}_{\mu} \cdot \mib{S}_{8\mu}
\! +\! J_2 \! \! \! \sum_{\mu=\alpha,\beta} \! \! \mib{S}_{7} \cdot \mib{S}_{8\mu},$$ where $J_1$ is the Kondo exchange coupling, $J_2$ denotes the effective negative Hund rule coupling among $\Gamma_7$ and $\Gamma_8$ orbitals,[@Kubo] $\mib{s}_{\mu}$ denotes the conduction electron spin for the $\mu$ orbital, and $\mib{S}_{7}$ and $\mib{S}_{8\mu}$ indicate the local spin on $\Gamma_7$ and $\Gamma_{8\mu}$ orbitals, respectively.
In Fig. 5, we show the typical results of the entropy and specific heat of the extended $s$-$d$ model with $J_1=0.5$ and $J_2=0.1$. We clearly find a residual entropy of $0.5 \log 2$ at low temperatures, suggesting the emergence of the two-channel Kondo effect. In contrast to the well-known two-channel Kondo model, we observe a remnant of the plateau of $\log 2$ before entering the two-channel Kondo region. Corresponding to the change of the entropy, we observe a small peak in the specific heat. Here, we show only the results for $J_1=0.5$ and $J_2=0.1$, but the two-channel Kondo behavior can be widely observed for positive values of $J_1$ and $J_2$.
{width="8.0truecm"}
Now, we briefly discuss the candidate $f^3$ materials to observe the two-channel Kondo behavior. A simple way is to search Nd cubic compounds with $\Gamma_6$ ground states. For the purpose, it is convenient to synthesize Nd compounds with the same crystal structure as that of Pr compounds with a $\Gamma_3$ non-Kramers ground state from the discussion on the CEF states for $n=2$ and $3$. As we have remarked in Fig. 3, to observe the two-channel Kondo effect in $f^3$ systems, it is necessary to consider relatively large hybridization, suggesting that a rare-earth ion should be surrounded by many ligand ions. In this sense, good candidates are considered to be Nd 1-2-20 compounds, such as NdIr$_2$Zn$_{20}$,[@Nd1] NdRh$_2$Zn$_{20}$, NdV$_2$Al$_{20}$,[@Nd2] and NdTi$_2$Al$_{20}$,[@Nd3; @Nd4] since corresponding Pr compounds are known to exhibit $\Gamma_3$ non-Kramers doublets.[@Review]
Among them, the $\Gamma_6$ ground state has been confirmed for NdIr$_2$Zn$_{20}$,[@Nd1] but the signals of the two-channel Kondo effect have not been reported. At low temperatures, antiferromagnetic phases have been observed for NdIr$_2$Zn$_{20}$ [@Nd1] and NdTi$_2$Al$_{20}$,[@Nd4] while a ferromagnetic phase has been found for NdV$_2$Al$_{20}$.[@Nd2] Thus, a high pressure can be applied to such magnetic phases since we expect a chance to observe the two-channel Kondo behavior if we obtain a metallic phase through the quantum critical point under a high pressure.
Another candidate may be found in Np cubic compounds with a Np$^{4+}$ ion including three $5f$ electrons because in general, the itinerant nature of $5f$ electrons is large in comparison with that of $4f$ electrons. However, as the treatment of Np compounds is strictly limited, it may be difficult to find the two-channel Kondo behavior in Np cubic compounds.
In summary, we found the two-channel Kondo effect in the seven-orbital impurity Anderson model hybridized with $\Gamma_8$ conduction electrons for the case of $n=3$ with the local $\Gamma_6$ ground state. To detect the two-channel Kondo effect emerging from Nd ions, we proposed to perform the experiments using Nd 1-2-20 compounds.
The author thanks Y. Aoki, K. Hattori, R. Higashinaka, K. Kubo, and T. Matsuda for discussions on heavy-electron systems. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP16H04017. The computation in this work was done using the facilities of the Supercomputer Center of Institute for Solid State Physics, University of Tokyo.
[99]{}
B. Coqblin and J. R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. [**185**]{}, 847 (1969).
Ph. Noziéres and A. Blandin, J. Physique [**41**]{}, 193 (1980).
B. A. Jones and C. M. Varma, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**58**]{}, 843 (1987).
B. A. Jones, C. M. Varma, and J. W. Wilkins, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**61**]{}, 125 (1988).
D. L. Cox, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**59**]{}, 1240 (1987).
D. L. Cox and A. Zawadowski, [*Exotic Kondo Effects in Metals*]{} (Taylor & Francis, London, 1999), p. 24.
M. Koga and H. Shiba, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. [**64**]{}, 4345 (1995).
M. Koga and H. Shiba, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. [**65**]{}, 3007 (1996).
H. Kusunose and K. Miyake, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. [**66**]{}, 1180 (1997).
H. Kusunose, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. [**67**]{}, 61 (1998).
Y. Shimizu, O. Sakai, and S. Suzuki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. [**67**]{}, 2395 (1998).
M. Koga, G. Zaránd, and D. L. Cox, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**83**]{}, 2421 (1999).
M. Koga, Phys. Rev. B [**61**]{}, 395 (2000).
S. Yotsuhashi, K. Miyake, and H. Kusunose, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. [**71**]{}, 389 (2002).
K. Hattori and K. Miyake, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. [**74**]{}, 2193 (2005).
M. Koga and M. Matsumoto, Phys. Rev. B [**77**]{}, 094411 (2008).
S. Nishiyama, H. Matsuura, and K. Miyake, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. [**79**]{}, 104711 (2010).
S. Nishiyama and K. Miyake, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. [**80**]{}, 124706 (2011).
See, for instance, T. Onimaru and H. Kusunose, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. [**85**]{}, 082002 (2016) and references therein.
A. Sakai and S. Nakatsuji, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. [**80**]{}, 063701 (2011).
T. Onimaru, K. T. Matsumoto, Y. F. Inoue, K. Umeo, Y. Saiga, Y. Matsushita, R. Tamura, K. Nishimoto, I. Ishii, T. Suzuki, and T. Takabatake, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. [**79**]{}, 033704 (2010).
T. Onimaru, K. T. Matsumoto, Y. F. Inoue, K. Umeo, T. Sakakibara, Y. Karaki, M. Kubota, and T. Takabatake, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**106**]{}, 177001 (2011).
R. Higashinaka, A. Nakama, M. Ando, M. Watanabe, Y. Aoki, and H. Sato, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. [**80**]{}, SA048 (2011).
A. Tsuruta and K. Miyake, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. [**84**]{}, 114714 (2015)
H. Kusunose, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. [**85**]{}, 064708 (2016).
J. C. Slater, [*Quantum Theory of Atomic Structure*]{} (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1960).
M. T. Hutchings, Solid State Phys. [**16**]{}, 227 (1964).
K. R. Lea, M. J. M. Leask, and W. P. Wolf, J. Phys. Chem. Solids [**23**]{}, 1381 (1962).
W. T. Carnall, P. R. Fields, and K. Rajnak, J. Chem. Phys. [**49**]{}, 4424 (1968).
K. G. Wilson, Rev. Mod. Phys. [**47**]{}, 773 (1975).
H. R. Krishna-murthy, J. W. Wilkins, and K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. B [**21**]{}, 1003 (1980).
T. S. Kim, L. N. Oliveira, and D. L. Cox, Phys. Rev. B [**55**]{}, 12460 (1997).
K. Hattori, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. [**74**]{}, 3135 (2005).
T. Hotta and K. Ueda, Phys. Rev. B [**67**]{}, 104518 (2003).
T. Hotta and H. Harima, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. [**75**]{}, 124711 (2006).
K. Kubo and T. Hotta, Phys. Rev. B [**95**]{}, 054425 (2017).
Y. Yamane, R. Yamada, T. Onimaru, K. Uenishi, K. Wakiya, K. T. Matsumoto, K. Umeo, and T. Takabatake, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. [**86**]{}, 054708 (2017).
T. Namiki, Q. Lei, Y. Ishikawa, and K. Nishimura, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. [**85**]{}, 073706 (2016).
T. Namiki, Y. Murata, K. Baba, K. Shimojo, and K. Nishimura, JPS Conf. Proc. [**3**]{}, 011055 (2014).
T. Namiki, K. Nosaka, K. Tsuchida, Q. Lei, R. Kanamori, and K. Nishimura, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. [**683**]{}, 012017 (2016).
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We consider dimensional reduction techniques for the Liouville-von Neumann equation for the evaluation of the expectation values in a mixed quantum system. In applications such as nuclear spin dynamics the main goal for simulations is being able to simulate a system with as many spins as possible, for this reason it is very important to have an efficient method that scales well with respect to particle numbers. We describe several existing methods that have appeared in the literature, pointing out their limitations particularly in the setting of large systems. We introduce a method for direct computation of expectations via Chebyshev polynomials (DEC) based on evaluation of a trace formula combined with expansion in modified Chebyshev polynomials. This reduction is highly efficient and does not destroy any information. We demonstrate the practical application of the scheme for a nuclear spin system and compare with several alternatives, focusing on the performance of the various methods with increasing system dimension. Our method may be applied to autonomous quantum problems where the desired outcome of quantum simulation, rather than being a full description of the system dynamics, is only the expectation value of some given observable.'
author:
- Giacomo Mazzi
- 'Benedict J. Leimkuhler'
bibliography:
- 'plain.bib'
title: 'Dimensional Reductions for the Computation of Time–Dependent Quantum Expectations'
---
Introduction
============
The motion of a quantum system of particles is described by the Schrödinger equation : $$\label{schro0}
\frac{\partial {|\Psi\rangle}}{\partial t}=-i H {|\Psi\rangle},$$ where $H$ is the Hamiltonian and ${|\Psi\rangle}$ the wave function of the system, and we have chosen physical quantities such that $\hbar=1$. When $H$ is time independent it is possible to have an exact representation of the solution: $$\label{schro}
|\Psi(t)\rangle=e^{-iH t}|\Psi_0\rangle.$$ From a numerical point of view finding a solution of (\[schro\]) is a challenging task, due to the cost of computing the operator exponential $e^{-i H t}$. Many numerical methods have been proposed over the years to solve (\[schro\]), from polynomial expansion of the exponential [@tal; @vijay; @spinev], to projection on Krylov subspaces [@moro; @park]. When the wave function ${|\Psi\rangle}$ depends on the particle positions $q$ and momenta $p$ it is very common to adopt a splitting method for the Hamiltonian, $H=T+V$ being $V$ diagonal and $T$ the kinetic term which is diagonal in Fourier space. With this approach the main issue is the evaluation of a fast Fourier transform (FFT) to switch between the $x$-grid and the $p$-grid; the cost of this transform is of order $O(N\log N)$, [@hardin]. However when the wave function depends on other variables, like the spin of the particles, it is not straightforward to apply a splitting method. For a general survey of these approaches see Refs. .
It is important to remark that all of these methods suffer when the dimension of the space needed to represent the wave function $\Psi$ accurately becomes large. In many practical cases, as for example in spin dynamics, the complexity of the computational problem grows exponentially with the number of atoms. For pure spin dynamics $\Psi$ may be represented by a vector in a space of dimension $(2I+1)^n$, where $n$ is the number of particles with spin$I$ present.
This paper is organized as follows: in §2 we introduce the Liouville–von Neumann equation that describes the dynamics of the density matrix, we also clarify the issues that complicate its numerical solution. In §3 we discuss two of the main techniques that have been applied in quantum simulation for the evaluation of the exponential that appears in the solution of the Schrodinger equation, specifically Krylov expansion via Lanczos–Arnoldi iterations and the expansion in Chebyshev polynomials. We also present a more recent method based on a different evaluation of the Krylov subspace expansion called Zero Track Elimination (ZTE) [@kuprov]. This method has been developed for simulations of nuclear spin dynamics within the Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) community. We give what we believe to be the first mathematical discussion of the method, exploring its limitations and clarifying situations in which it works.
In §4 we introduce a new method we have developed: the Direct Expectation values via Chebyshev (DEC). This is the main result of this paper. In this section we also discuss the technical details of the implementation of the DEC method.
In §5 we provide a performance comparison of DEC with three separate alternatives: the classic Krylov expansion based on Lanczos algorithm, with the new ZTE method and with the Chebyshev expansion. The sample system considered is a pairwise interacting nuclear spin system; even if it is a simple system it contains the key features of the systems of interest to the NMR community.
The Liouville von–Neumann Equation
==================================
When the sample of interest is composed of a large number $N$ of identical systems each described by a wave function $|\Psi^j \rangle$, $j=1,\ldots,N$, we may introduce a statistical operator called density operator $\varrho$ defined by: $$\varrho=\sum_{j=1}^N |\Psi^j\rangle\langle\Psi^j|,$$ which evolves according to the Liouville-von Neumann equation: $$\label{liovvn}
\frac{\partial \varrho}{\partial t}=-i[H,\varrho].$$ If $\varrho$ is expanded using a (finite) approximate basis set $\{|\varphi_1\rangle\ldots |\varphi_n\rangle\}$, (\[liovvn\]) may be viewed as an ordinary differential equation in a matrix argument. In the time independent case the solution for (\[liovvn\]) may be written: $$\label{sol}
\varrho(t)=e^{-iH t}\varrho_0 e^{iH t}.$$
It is possible and sometimes preferable to rewrite (\[sol\]) by use of the Liouvillian $L= \rm{Id} \otimes H-H \otimes \rm{Id}$, where $\rm{Id}$ is the identity matrix, allowing us to recast $\varrho$ as a vector: $$\label{liov}
\varrho(t)=e^{-iL t}\varrho_0.$$ The main issue is then to evaluate the exponential of the matrix $L$. For a large system and using a typical basis set, $H$ (and consequently $L$) will be a structured sparse matrix.
While the evolution of the system is described by the density matrix, the outputs we are typically interested in obtaining from quantum simulations are the expectations of observables, these being the only quantities we can compare with the experiments. In the density matrix formalism the expectation value of an observable $Q$, associated with an operator $\hat{Q}$ is written as: $$\label{obs}
\langle \hat{Q}(t) \rangle={\rm Trace} \{\varrho(t) \hat{Q}\}.$$ Whereas in general quantum simulations the equation of motion is solved for a quantity, $\varrho$, which has dimension $n \times n$, the types of outputs we are actually interested in are typically one dimensional objects (\[obs\]). In this paper we exploit this fact and design an algorithm that computes (almost) directly the evolution of the expectation value (\[obs\]), instead of the evolution of the density matrix (\[sol\]). This approach does not lose any information of the original system (the only errors arise due to truncation), but at the same time the method provides a powerful computational tool, with potential dramatic reduction in the computational cost, especially when dealing with large matrices. The main idea of this approach is to exploit features of a Chebyshev expansion for the matrix exponential in (\[liov\]).
Several methods to evaluate (\[liov\]) are discussed in a recent monograph [@lubichbok]; however our proposed [*Direct evaluation of the Expectation values via Chebyshev polynomials*]{} (DEC) method is different because it does not solve the evolution for the density matrix. Instead it exploits the trace evaluation in (\[obs\]) and with the evaluation of just one Chebyshev expansion it allows the solution of (\[obs\]) at any time. DEC can be extremely powerful when we are only interested in the expectation values; if instead it is necessary to evaluate the evolution of the density matrix itself (\[liov\]), then a traditional approach might be the best choice.
Existing Methods
================
Krylov expansion via Lanczos–Arnoldi
------------------------------------
In the past decades many methods have been developed for numerical evaluation of the matrix exponential, [@nineteen]. However for large sparse matrices, the methods usually applied are those based on expansion in Krylov subspace [@saad1; @lubich1; @schulze; @bai]. The main idea is to project (\[liov\]) onto the subspace: $$\label{kry_sub}
K_m(L,\varrho)={\rm span} \{\varrho_0,L\varrho_0,L^2\varrho_0,\ldots,L^m\varrho_0\}.$$ To get a suitable basis set of (\[kry\_sub\]) we may use the Lanczos algorithm [@lancz], as $L$ is Hermitian. The Lanczos method is an iterative method, a very desirable feature in the context of large sparse matrices. For specific details see Ref.[@golubok; @cullum].
An approximation for $\varrho(t)$ is: $$\label{kryrho}
\varrho(t)=e^{-i L t}\varrho_0 \approx \|\varrho_0\| V_m e^{-i T_m t} e_1,$$ where $T_m$ and $V_m$ come from the Lanczos algorithm. The Lanczos algorithm provides an orthonormal basis set $V_m$ for the Krylov subspace $K_m(L,\varrho_0)$ via a three-term recursion [@lancz; @cullum]: $$\label{lancz}
\beta_{j+1}q_{j+1}=Lq_j-\alpha_jq_j-\beta_j q_{j-1} \qquad q_1=\varrho_0.$$ $T_m$ is a tridiagonal matrix of size $m \times m$, and $e_1$ is the first vector of the canonical basis of size $n$. This technique is very powerful for short time simulations, because with few iterations $m$ it is possible to have remarkably good approximations, but for longer times larger Krylov subspaces would be needed to stay close to the real solution. On the other hand if we do not consider enough terms in the Lanczos algorithm for longer times, (\[kryrho\]) is no longer a reliable approximation.
It is possible to set a stopping criterion for the Lanczos iterations [@lubich1]; for a given $t$ we can find $m$ such that: $$\label{stopcrit}
t [T_m]_{m+1,m} \|e^{-i tT_m}\|_{m,1}\leq \varepsilon.$$
In our experiments the best way to implement a Krylov expansion was to evaluate each step: $$\varrho_{n+1}=e^{-iL dt}\varrho_n\approx \|\varrho_n \| V_m^n e^{-i T_m^n t} e_1.$$ In this way with less than $10$ iterations of Lanczos per step it is possible to have a fast and accurate benchmark. The obvious drawback is that no information passes from step $n$ to step $n+1$. However in our numerical tests the use of a longer timestep that would allow a common Krylov subset $K_m(L,\varrho)$ for more than one step $\varrho_n$ was not preferable as more iterations of (\[lancz\]) were then required. As the equation (\[stopcrit\]) involves the evaluation of the exponential of a tridiagonal matrix, when $m$ becomes large, this operation may become a serious bottleneck for the whole simulation.
The Chebyshev expansion {#cheby}
-----------------------
Another method that has been widely applied for solving (\[schro0\]) is the expansion of the exponential in Chebyshev polynomials [@tal; @vijay].
The preliminary step of this method is to rescale the matrix within the interval $[-1,1]$, as outside this interval the Chebyshev polynomials grow rapidly, and the expansion becomes unstable; to do that we need to evaluate the two extremes of the spectrum of $L$. In order to obtain extreme values we propose, as already mentioned in the literature [@saad_lanc], to perform a few steps of Lanczos iteration, as this provides a good approximation for the extreme eigenvalues, for small computational cost. If we define these two values as $\alpha$ and $\beta$, and assume $\beta\leq \sigma(L)\leq \alpha$, we may rewrite $L$ as $L=(S\,{\rm Id}-L_sD)$, where $D=(\alpha-\beta)/2$, $S=(\alpha+\beta)/2$, and $-1\leq\sigma(L_s)\leq 1$. We may then expand the exponential of $L_s$ in the Chebyshev polynomials and we arrive at the following equation for $\varrho$: $$\label{chebexp}
\varrho(t)=e^{-iLt}\varrho_0\approx e^{-itS}\left(\sum_{k=0}^{n_{\rm max}}c_k(t_D) T_k(L_s)\varrho_0\right),$$ with $t_D=Dt$. Both $c_k(t_D)$ and $T_k(L_s)$ can be calculated iteratively: $$\label{ck}
c_k(t)=(2-\delta_{k,0})(-i)^k J_k(t),$$ $$\label{Tk}
T_{k+1}(x)=2T_k(x)x-T_{k-1}(x),$$ with initial values $T_0(x)={\rm Id}$, $T_1(x)=x$. $J_k(t)$ is the $k$-th Bessel function of the first kind.
The Bessel Functions of the First Kind of integer order may be evaluated directly by using a three-term recurrence relation $$\label{besselj}
J_{n+1}(t)=\frac{2n}{t}J_n-J_{n-1}.$$ It is well known that (\[besselj\]) becomes numerically unstable for $n>t$, [@backward]. To improve the method, we may exploit the linear nature of the iterative algorithm. It is possible to use Miller’s algorithm, and to solve an inverted form of (\[besselj\]), i.e. to compute $J_{n-1}$ given $J_n$, $J_{n+1}$ [@backward]. When using Miller’s Algorithm it is suggested to expand the number of terms (providing a sort of buffer), i.e. to start the backward iteration process from $m_{\rm start}=n+r$, where $n$ is the actual order of the function we are interested on and $r$ is some small expansion. In this case we need to know already from an a priori error analysis how many iterations need to be performed to to get below the threshold $\varepsilon$.
It is possible to prove that for the rescaled Hermitian matrix $L_s$, when applied to a vector of unit Euclidian norm, we have [@lubichbok]: $$\label{errlub}
\|P_{m-1}(tL_s)\varrho_0-e^{-it L_s}\varrho_0\|\leq 4(e^{1-(t/2m)^2}\frac{t}{2m})^m,$$ for $m>t$, where $P_m(t)$ is the order $m$ expansion in Chebyshev polynomials. This equation indicates that there is a superlinear decay of the error when $m> t$. The formula may be derived by examining the asymptotic behaviour of the Bessel functions (\[asympt\]). We may then use the relation $4(\exp\{1-(\tau/2m)^2\}\frac{\tau}{2m})^m\leq \varepsilon$ to approximate $m$.
From a practical point of view the usual way of applying Chebyshev is to evaluate [@spinev; @tal]: $$\label{cheb3}
\varrho_{n+1}=e^{-i L dt }\varrho_n\simeq P_{n_{\rm max}}(dt L) \varrho_n,$$ where: $$P_{n_{\rm max}}=e^{-idt S} \sum_{k=0}^{n_{\rm max}}c_k(dt D) T_k(L_s).$$ $m$ can be evaluated either from (\[errlub\]) or directly checking the convergence (\[c\_max1\]).
To avoid numerical instabilities coming from the iterative formula for the Bessel functions it is also possible to get $P_{m}$ for a given $m$ via the Clenshaw Algorithm [@clens; @lubichbok]: $$d_k=c_k \varrho_n+2 L_s d_{k+1}-d_{k+2}, \, k=m-1,m-2,\ldots,0,$$ with initial values $d_{m+1}=d_m=0$, and $P_m(dt L)\varrho_0=d_0-d_2$.
The Zero–Track–Elimination method
---------------------------------
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) is a spectroscopy technique that exploits the interaction between nuclear spins and electromagnetic fields in order to analyse the samples. The temporal evolution of such a system is described via a density matrix that has size $(2I+1/2)^n$ where $I$ is the spin and $n$ the number of nuclei. The exponential growth of the size of $\varrho$ with respect to $n$ impedes the use of simulations when dealing with systems involving more than few ($5$-$6$) spins. Many attempts have been made to solve this (see Refs. for recent approaches), even using Chebyshev polynomials [@spinev]. These algorithms have been developed to simulate both liquid systems, where the Hamiltonian is generally time independent, and for Solid–State NMR. In the last case the Hamiltonian is time dependent due to the non averaging out of anisotropic interactions during the motion of the sample, and as previously remarked DEC is not applicable in this case.
Recently also a new method for model reduction in the simulation of large spin systems, so called Zero Track Elimination (ZTE), has been presented, [@kuprov]. This technique is based on the idea of pruning out the elements of $\varrho(t)$ which do not belong to $K(L,\varrho_0)$. In practice, the initial density matrix $\varrho_0$ is a sparse vector.
In order to reduce the steps needed to evolve the full system, we monitor the elements of $\varrho(t)$ that stay below a chosen threshold $\xi$ during this first evolution steps and introduce structural zeros based on these observations. The evolution is then performed in this reduced state space $(\varrho_Z,L_Z)$. The idea is extremely appealing, as once the propagator for $L_z$ is evaluated all the subsequent steps have the cost of a reduced matrix–vector, and it is possible to use (\[prop\]) for the reduced system.
The initial time length is set as the inverse of the largest Larmor frequency. The Larmor frequency is a given quantity for each element that depends on the physical property of the nucleus and is the frequency of resonance for a non–interacting spin: $\omega_j^0=-\gamma_j B$, where $-\gamma_j$ is the gyromagnetic ration of the nucleus and $B$ the applied magnetic field.
The time–length of the initial check is then: $$\label{larmin}
\delta t=\frac{1}{t_{\rm lar}}=\frac{2\pi}{min_j\{|\omega_j^0|\}}$$ where $\omega^0_j$ is the Larmor frequency of the $j$-th spin. The following theorem given in [@kuprov] assures that it is possible to prune out from the evolution those states that remain exactly $0$ during the first few time steps. It is possible to prove that for a state $|l\rangle$ there holds the equation: $$\label{ztt}
\langle l|e^{-iLt} |\varrho_0\rangle=0,\, t\in [0,\delta t] \Rightarrow \langle l|e^{-iLt} |\varrho_0\rangle=0,\, t\in [0,\infty)$$
To prove (\[ztt\]) it is sufficient to expand $e^{-iL t}$ into a Taylor expansion. In fact: $$\langle l |e^{-iL t}|\varrho_0\rangle=\langle l|\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} L^k \frac{(-it)^k}{k!}| \varrho_0\rangle= \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-it)^k}{k!} \langle l| L^k\varrho_0\rangle,
$$ can be true for any $t \in [0,\delta t]$ only if $\langle l| L^k|\varrho_0\rangle=0$ for all the $k$, but this means that $\langle l |e^{-iL t}|\varrho_0\rangle=0, tt\in [0,\infty)$.
From a practical point of view few states $\langle l|$ obey (\[ztt\]), but a much higher number of states will stay *close* to $0$ during the first $j$ time steps, where $j=\delta t/dt$. So the states $\langle l |$ that are pruned out are those for which: $$\label{thin}
\langle l |e^{-iL t}|\varrho_0\rangle<\epsilon,\quad t \in [0,\delta t]$$
It is claimed [@kuprov] that the error of such an approximation is similar to what would be obtained by considering in the Krylov expansion the contributions coming from high values of $n$ in $L^n\varrho_0$.
The main problem of this approach is the choice of $\delta t$, i.e. the duration of the initial propagation. In fact if we look at a full diagonalization of $L$ we see that: $$\label{diag}
\varrho(t)=X e^{-iD t}X^{-1}\varrho_0,$$ so each element of $\varrho(t)$ can be written as a sum of oscillators vibrating at the different $\lambda_j \in \sigma(L)$. $$\label{osc}
\varrho_k(t)=\sum_{j=1}^n X_{[k,j]}\mu_j e^{-i\lambda_j t }, \qquad \mu_j=\sum_{l=1}^N X_{[j,l]}\varrho_0^l.$$ From (\[osc\]) it is clear that to ensure that we are not pruning out the low frequencies modes we would need at least $\delta t \propto 1/\min_j \{|\lambda_j| \} $, and this could be different from the lowest Larmor frequency $\min_j\{|\omega_j^0|\}$ as this last is a quantity related to the non–interacting spins.
It is possible to have an estimate of the lowest eigenvalue of $L$ using a technique like the one we used for the Chebyshev expansion (\[cheby\]). The simple choice of $\delta t$ depending on $\lambda_j$ rather then $\omega_j^0$ is not enough to ensure the validity of (\[thin\]).
Within this framework we can restate (\[thin\]) in a simpler form for a one dimension function and prove that:
\[zteth\] Given a function $f(t)=\sum_{j=1}^n e^{-\lambda_j t} \mu_j$ s.t. $|f(t)|<\epsilon$ for $t\in[0,2\pi/\min_j\{\lambda_j\}]$, this is not sufficient to ensure that $|f(t)|<\epsilon$ for $t\in[0,\infty)$.
To prove (\[zteth\]) we can check that if the $\lambda_j$ are not well separated then it is possible to have a combination of similar frequencies that build up on a total frequency that is the lowest common multiplier of the initial frequencies. In the general form if for one or more $\varrho_k$ we have the resonance condition: $$\label{examp}
\varrho_k(t)=\alpha e^{-i2\pi\lambda t}-\sum_j \beta^j e^{-i2\pi(\lambda +\delta^j)t},$$ and $\beta_j,\alpha >0$ rationals such that $\alpha=\sum_j \beta_j$. $\exists$ small enough $\delta_j$ s.t. we have that $|\varrho_k(t)|<\epsilon$, $t \in[0,\delta t]$ but at the periodic maximum $ t >\delta t$ s.t. $|f(t)|=\alpha+\sum_j \beta_j \gg \epsilon$.
In the appendix we present one example of such a function.
In order to ensure the validity of (\[thin\]) even with $\delta t$ that depends on $\sigma(L)$ rather than the Larmor frequencies, we need to check the separation of the eigenvalues, and obviously an analysis of that kind would be as expensive as a whole simulation.
In practice, it might be argued that we are unlikely to have a dynamics like (\[examp\]), but especially with systems with many spins, a wide variety of behaviors are certainly possible in the general situation.
Focusing on NMR simulations however the reason why ZTE performs so well [@kuprov] lies in the fact that the numerical comparison with other methods is not performed on $\varrho(t)$ but on the observables (\[obs\]). In particular for experimental reasons the only quantity that can be compared with experiments is the [*free induction decay*]{} (FID) signal: $$\label{fid}
f(t)={\rm Trace } \left\{\varrho(t) I_p\right\}.$$ $\varrho(t)$ can be written as combination of Pauli matrices, and $I_p$ is the shift up operator: $I_p=I_x+iI_y$. The Fourier transform of $f(t)$ gives then the spectrum of the sample, where each resonance frequency is revealed by a peak. Due to relaxation effects in the experiments the shape of the resonance peaks is not a delta function (as would result from (\[osc\]) but is a smooth function. To model this smoothness also for the simulated data it is common practice to evaluate the Fourier transform not of (\[fid\]) but for an exponentially decaying function $\tilde{f}(t)$: $$\label{exp}
\tilde{f}(t)=e^{-\xi t} f(t),$$ where the parameter $\xi$ comes from other fitted data [@Levitt]. The main effect of (\[exp\]) is exactly to smooth out all the low frequency modes that will differentiate $\varrho(t)$ from $\varrho_Z(t)$.
There are however some drawbacks:
- for this method there is no available convergence theory;
- the performance depends strongly from the initial condition $\varrho_0$, and on $H$. As expected, in our tests the size of the reduced system could change by a factor $2$ depending on the number of interacting spins. The reason for this effect comes from the fact that the less sparse $L$ is, the more non–zero states will appear within the first steps, thus reducing the effectiveness of the reduction $L_z$.
- Another reason of the strong dependence of ZTE with respect to the initial conditions comes from (\[larmin\]); depending on the Larmor frequencies, and on the timestep size the number of evolution steps at the beginning can become large, and this being the most expensive part of the simulation the influence of it on the total computation costs can become significant.
The Direct Expectation values via Chebyshev
===========================================
The common point of all the methods presented in the previous section is that they involve the propagation of the matrix $\varrho$, and for this reason they suffer from requiring that matrix operations (or matrix-vector operations) be performed at each step of calculation. Let us recall that the only quantities that can be compared between quantum simulations and experiments are the observables, for an operator $\hat{Q}$ we have: $$\label{obs1}
\langle \hat{Q}(t) \rangle={\rm Trace} \{\varrho(t) \hat{Q}\}.$$ The first step of DEC is to perform a Chebyshev expansion as seen in section \[cheby\], to get: $$\label{chebexp1}
\varrho(t)=e^{-iLt}\varrho_0\approx e^{-itS}\left(\sum_{k=0}^{n_{\rm max}}c_k(t_D) T_k(L_s)\varrho_0\right),$$ If we insert (\[chebexp1\]) into (\[obs1\]) we find: $$\label{obs_cheb}
\langle \hat{Q}(t)\rangle={\rm Trace}\left\{ \left(e^{-i t S}\sum_{k=0}^{n_{\rm max}}c_k(t_D) T_k(L_s)\varrho_0\right) \hat{Q}\right\}.$$ By exploiting the linearity of the trace operation we can pull out of the trace all time dependent parts, and evaluate once for all the coefficients $T_k(L_s)$. In fact we may rewrite (\[obs\_cheb\]) as: $$\label{obs_cheb2}
\langle \hat{Q}(t)\rangle=e^{-itS}\sum_{k=0}^{n_{\rm max}}c_k(t_D) {\rm Trace}\left\{ T_k(L_s)\hat{Q}\right\}.$$ This is the key equation of the DEC method as it is possible to store an array of scalar values $\tilde{T}_k={\rm Trace}\{(T_k\varrho_0)\hat{Q}\}$. All the time dependent terms are just scalar values that have to be multiplied by $\tilde{T}_k$ to get the evolution of $\hat{Q}$ at any time: $$\label{obs_cheb3}
\langle \hat{Q}(t)\rangle=e^{-itS}\sum_{k=0}^{n_{\rm max}}c_k(tD) \tilde{T}_k.$$
If more than one observable is required it is still possible to use DEC. The only difference with the single expectation case is that we need to store different sets of $T_k$, one for each operator $\hat{Q}$.
Stopping Criterion
------------------
The number of terms for the polynomial expansion in (\[chebexp\]) depends on a prescribed tolerance $\varepsilon$, and on the time $t_D$. In other methods based on Chebyshev approximation [@spinev], the following has been suggested as a stopping criterion: $$\label{c_max}
n_{\rm max}\quad {\rm s.t.}\quad \|c_{n_{\rm max}}(t_D)\|<\varepsilon.$$ Due to the zeros of the Bessel function $J$, at fixed time $t_D$, (\[c\_max\]) may hold for some $n$, even though the expansion has not yet reached the convergence regime; it may happen that for $n_1>n$ we have that $c_{n_1}(t_D)>c_n(t_D)$. To avoid this effect it is enough to use as a stopping criterion a combination of two Bessel functions; the cost of such a stopping criterion is that at most we need to perform an extra iteration step (\[ck\]). In our numerical tests we have used the following: $$\label{c_max1}
n_{\rm max}\, {\rm s.t.}\, \sqrt{\|c_{n_{\rm max}-1}(t_D)\|^2+\|c_{n_{\rm max}}(t_D)^2\|}<\varepsilon.$$ The total time $\tau$ plays a role here, since the larger $\tau$ the more terms $(T_k,c_k)$ will be needed to get $| c_k|$ below the threshold $\varepsilon$.
Computation of the Expansion
----------------------------
In order to optimise the number of terms we evaluate, but without having to check at each step whether we have already evaluated enough terms $T_k$, we propose to evaluate first $\langle \hat{Q}(t)\rangle$, at the final time $\tau$, and to store the $N_{\rm max}$ values of $\tilde{T}_k$. We can prove that:
Given a Chebyshev expansion for an exponential $e^{-iL t}\varrho_0$ if (\[c\_max1\]) holds for a given time $\tau$ and small enough $\varepsilon$ then (\[c\_max1\]) holds for any time $t\leq \tau$.
From equation (\[ck\]) it is clear that $c_k$ depends on the Bessel functions. If we look at the asymptotic behaviour of the Bessel function of fist kind, for any $k\in N$, we have that, for $k$ fixed [@handbok]: $$\label{asympt}
J_k(t)\sim \frac{1}{\Gamma(k+1)}\left(\frac{t}{2}\right)^k, \qquad \lim t\rightarrow 0,$$ where $\Gamma(t)$ is the Euler–$\Gamma$ and for $n\in Z$ we have that $\Gamma(n)=(n-1)!$. Equation (\[asympt\]) shows that for any $k\neq 0$, in a neighbourhood of $t=0$, $J_k(t)$ is increasing monotonically with respect to $t$. This behaviour is maintained for the whole interval $[0,j_k']$ where $j_k'$ is the first zero of the derivative of $J_k$. It is possible to show (see Ref. , Eq.$9.5.2$), that $k\leq j_k'$; consequently we can say that if (\[c\_max1\]) holds for a given $n_{\rm max}$ at $\tau$ and $\tau\leq n_{\rm max}$, then we are in the monotonically increasing region for $J_{n_{\rm max}}$ and $J_{n_{\rm max}+1}$. In this case, equation (\[c\_max1\]) holds also for any $t\leq \tau$.
![Example of few integer order Bessel Functions of the first kind. []{data-label="fig:bessel"}](figure1.eps){width="45.00000%"}
Efficient Implementation
------------------------
The cost of DEC is all in the first step. Note that the cost of the evaluation of any $\tilde{T}_k$ itself is roughly equivalent to that of a matrix–matrix multiplication, as per the iteration $T_{k+1}(L_s)=2T_k(L_s)-T_{k-1}$ (\[Tk\]). But what is actually needed in all our calculations is $T_k\varrho_0$. Because of the linearity of the iterative expression, we may multiply $T_0$ and $T_1$ by $\varrho_0$ and then use (\[Tk\]) directly on $T_k\varrho_0$. The iterated operation in then just a matrix–vector multiplication.
After all the $\tilde{T}_k$ needed have been stored, it is possible to get $\langle Q(t)\rangle$ at any time $t\in[0,\tau]$ by evaluating: $$\label{Qt}
\langle Q(t)\rangle=e^{-i Dt_s} \sum_{k=1}^{m_{max}} c_k(t_s) \tilde{T}_k$$ where the $c_k$ are evaluated iteratively via (\[ck\]), and $m_{max}$ satisfies (\[c\_max1\]) for $tD$.\
For the details of the algorithm we refer to the Appendix. As a final remark we note that if the Hamiltonian is time dependent it is not possible to apply DEC, as it is not possible anymore to isolate the time dependent part out of the trace.
Numerical Experiments
=====================
As in many other physical systems, nuclear spin dynamics provides a perfect example to test DEC, because the final outcome of the simulations is an observable, the free induction decay (FID) signal, and this result is the sole important quantity, as it is the only data available from experiment.
As Hamiltonian we assumed a sum of isotropic chemical shift and the isotropic term of a pair interaction called Homonuclear J–couplings, that depends on the inner product $I_j\cdot I_k$ [@Levitt]: $$H=-\sum_{j=1}^n \omega_j^0 I_j^z+\sum_{j,l=1}^n J_{jl} I_j\cdot I_l.$$ For the initial density matrix we set $\varrho_0= -I_y$, that is the result of the application of a so called $x$-pulse to a sample already under the effect of a strong constant magnetic field along the $z$ direction [@Levitt]. This is the usual initial condition when the acquisition of the signal starts.
An illustration of the structure of the Liouvillian matrix is presented in Fig.\[fig:spy\]. The sparsity depends on the number of interactions among the spins. In most cases the J–coupling interaction matrix $J$ is relatively sparse. In our numerical test a strong coupling system, where $J$ is dense and each spin interacts with every other spins, was simulated.
{width="45.00000%"}
\[fig:spy\]
Due to the fact that our implementation involves only matrix–vector multiplication, techniques developed both for structured and unstructured sparse matrices may be exploited.
For comparison of computational costs we tested this method with an increasing number of spin particles using different methods to evaluate the exponential. In particular to examine the error we compared DEC with the [*expm*]{} function of *MATLAB*, that uses a scaling and squaring algorithm with Pade’ approximation. In this way we evaluate once for all $U=e^{-iL dt}$ where $dt$ is the step size of the simulation, and then at each time–step we propagate $\varrho$: $$\label{prop}
\varrho_{n+1}=U\varrho_n.$$ It is well known that in terms of computational costs this simplistic approach performs poorly, so we compared DEC also with the other methods presented in this paper: Krylov expansion via Lanczos [@sidje], the Chebyshev expansion, and ZTE [@kuprov].
For the Lanczos method we have used the function *expv* of the package EXPOKIT [@sidje] written in textsl[MATLAB]{}.
Summary of Results
------------------
{width="45.00000%"}
\[fig:loglog\]
The error-to-cost (measured in CPU time) diagrams are shown in Figure \[fig:loglog\] for all the methods described. All the numerical tests have been performed on a Dell PowerEdge 1950 wiht 4GB RAM and a DualCore Intel processors running in 32bit mode. The language used is *MATLAB*.
It is clear that DEC is almost an order of magnitude more efficient than the alternatives. To avoid instabilities coming form the evaluation of the Bessel functions in these numerical tests we set the tolerance to be $\varepsilon = 1e-7$.
DEC performs at its best for short time simulations (i.e. when total time $\tau$ is small), so that we do not need to evaluate a large number of $T_k$, and when at the same time the use of small time step $dt$ is required, as the cost for any step after the first is negligible. For instance, while for all the other methods the cost of a $1000$ step simulation with $dt=0.1$, is approximately half the cost of a simulation of $1000$ steps with $dt=0.1$, for DEC there is a gain of almost an order of magnitude, see Fig.\[fig:loglog1\].
![Logarithmic comparison of computational costs for Lanczos and DEC when simulating for the same number of total steps $N$ but with different stepzise $dt$. $N=1000$ in both the cases.[]{data-label="fig:loglog1"}](dt01.eps){width="45.00000%"}
Matrix size expm expv Chebyshev ZTE Reduced DEC
------------- ------- -------- ----------- -------- --------- --------
16 0.08 0.99 0.54 1.06 8 0.39
64 0.1 1.41 0.68 1.79 30 0.60
256 0.17 1.88 0.95 2.26 112 0.76
1024 1.5 7.87 2.40 5.80 420 1.14
4096 40.84 29.78 9.60 24.51 1584 1.93
16384 165.06 102.92 112.85 6006 16.11
65536 677.22 129.93
262144 542.98
: Comparison of computational costs, CPU time in seconds, for $dt=0.1$, $N=1000$.
\[table:comp1\]
Conclusion
==========
In this article we have presented a new method for simulation of an observable in a mixed quantum system. By expanding the exponential of the Hamiltonian in Chebyshev polynomials, and exploiting the trace operation performed when evaluating the expectation value of an observable, it is possible to reduce the evolution of any observable to a one–dimension function that can be evaluated directly.
We have also presented an optimal algorithm to perform such a calculation, and we have shown how this new method can easily compete in term of computational costs with a variety of model reduction approaches, whilst maintaining the approximation errors below a chosen threshold.
Moreover we have also studied the Zero Track Elimination method that has appeared in the literature. We have demonstrated that the ZTE method cannot be a reliable method for every system, but can be a powerful alternative in the restricted setting of NMR simulations.
G.M. is very grateful to Arieh Iserles for useful suggestions at the start of this work.
The DEC algorithm
=================
We provide here a detailed description of the algorithm.\
A counter–proof of the ZTE elimination
======================================
![$t$ against $|f(t)|$ plot, the dot is the value at time $\delta t$. []{data-label="fig:count"}](figZTE1.eps){width="40.00000%"}
We provide a specific counter–example for the Zero Track Elimination. In Fig.\[fig:count\] we have plot the absolute value of the function: $$f(t)=e^{-i2\pi t}-{\frac{1}{2}}e^{-i 2\pi(1.001)t}-{\frac{1}{2}}e^{-i 2\pi(0.999)t}.$$ If we look at the $\delta t$ evaluated looking at the lowest isolated frequency we have that $\delta t\simeq 1$, within this time $max|f(t)|\simeq 2 \times 10^{-5}$ but clearly the maximum amplitude of this periodic function will be $2$.
[9]{} H. Tal–Ezer and R. Kosloff, J. Chem. Phys., [**81**]{}, 3967–3971 (1984). A. Vijay and H. Metiu, J. Chem. Phys., [**116**]{}, 60–68 (2001). M.Veshtort and R.G.Griffin, J. Magn. Reson., [**178**]{}, 248–282, (2006). G. Moro and J.H. Freed, J. Chem. Phys. [**74**]{}(7), 3757–3773 (1981). T.J. Park and J.C. Light, J. Chem. Phys., [**85**]{}(10), 5870–5876, (1986). .
R.H. Hardin and F.D. Tappert, SIAM Rev. [**15**]{}, 423 (1973). C. Leforestier [*e*t. al.]{}, J. Comp. Phys. [**94**]{}, 59–80 (1991). C. Lubich *From Quantum to Classical Molecular Dynamics: Reduced Models and Numerical Analysis*, (Zurich Lectures in Advanced Mathematics, Zurich, 2008).
C. Moler and C. Van Loan, SIAM Review, [**45**]{}(1), 3–49 (2003). Y. Saad, SIAM J. Num. Anal., [**29**]{}(1), 209–228 (1992).
M. Hochbruck and C. Lubich, SIAM J. Num. Anal. [**34**]{}(5), 1911–1925 (1997). J.C. Schulze, P.J. Schmid and J.L. Sesterhenn, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, [**60**]{}, 591–609 (2009). Z. Bai, Appl. Numer. Math, [**43**]{}(1–2), 9–44 (2002).
C. Lanczos, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards, [**45**]{}, 255–282 (1950). G.H. Golub and C.F. Van Loan, *Matrix Computations*, (The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1996). J. Cullum and R.A. Willoughby, *Lanczos Algorithms for large symmetric eigenvalue computations*, (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1985). Y. Zhou, Y. Saad, M.L. Tiago and J.R. Chelikowsky, J. Comp. Phys., [**219**]{}(1), 172–184, (2006). M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun *Handbook of mathematical functions*, (Dover, New York, 1964). F.W.J. Olver and D.J. Sookne, Math. of Comp., [**26**]{}(120), 941–947, (1972). C.W. Clenshaw, *Chebyshev Series for Mathematical Functions*, Mathematical Tables, [**5**]{}, H.M. Stationery Office, London, (1962).
M.H. Levitt, *Spin Dynamics*, (Wiley, Chichester, 2001). M. Bak, J.T. Rasmussen and N.C. Nielsen, J. Magn. Reson. [**147**]{}, 296–330, (2000). I. Kuprov, J. Magn. Reson., [ **195**]{}, 45–51, (2008). R.B. Sidje, ACM Trans. Math. Softw., [**24**]{}(1), 130–156, (1998).
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
bibliography:
- 'bibliography/bibliography-short.bib'
title: |
A Conformance Checking-based Approach\
for Drift Detection in Business Processes
---
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: |
We propose a scheme for generation of continuous-wave THz radiation. The scheme requires a medium where three discrete states in a $\Lambda $ configuration can be selected, with the THz-frequency transition between the two lower metastable states. We consider the propagation of three-frequency continuous-wave electromagnetic (e.m.) radiation through a $\Lambda $ medium. Under resonant excitation, the medium absorption can be strongly reduced due to quantum interference of transitions, while the nonlinear susceptibility is enhanced. This leads to very efficient energy transfer between the e.m. waves providing a possibility for THz generation. We demonstrate that the photon conversion efficiency is approaching unity in this technique.
OCIS codes: 190.2620, 190.4410, 270.1670, 020.1670
address: |
Institut für Experimentalphysik, Technische Universität Graz, A-8010\
Graz, Austria
author:
- 'E.A. Korsunsky and D.V. Kosachiov[^1]'
title: 'Generation of continuous-wave THz radiation by use of quantum interference'
---
Generation of coherent terahertz electromagnetic radiation is a subject of much current research. This radiation might have interesting potential applications for electronics, chemical analysis of materials, local radars, tomography, environment monitoring [@THz], and also for quantum optics applications and for frequency standards [@strumia; @god93]. The THz range is in the gap between the radio-frequency and the visible ranges. Therefore, neither conventional electronic (microwave) methods nor the photonic ones can be directly applied to generate coherent THz radiation. Pulsed THz fields are produced since early seventies and successfully used in different applications. However, to the best of our knowledge, a reliable source of [*continuous-wave*]{} (c.w.) THz radiation is not available up to now.
Here we propose a c.w. generation scheme based on the effect of quantum interference in multilevel quantum systems (atoms, molecules, dopants in solids) induced by applied electromagnetic radiation. In an optically dense media, the interference may be destructive for linear susceptibility (absorption and refraction), so that an otherwise opaque medium becomes transparent. This process is termed electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) [@harr97]. The cancellation of absorption and refraction can also be explained as being due to the preparation of atoms in a coherent superposition (”dark” state) which is immune to applied radiation. When all the atomic population is perfectly trapped in this superposition, the medium does not ”see” the radiation. It turns out, however, that if the dark state is slightly disturbed the linear susceptibility remains still very small, while the nonlinear susceptibility is resonantly enhanced by constructive interference [@harr90]. Therefore, nonlinear frequency conversion/generation processes are very efficient in such media. Several successful experiments have been performed demonstrating efficient generation of XUV radiation with atomic hydrogen [@stoi], red to blue frequency conversion with molecular sodium [@welleg], enhanced four-wave mixing with doped crystals [@hemm97]. Harris with coworkers have reached blue to UV [@jain96] and UV to VUV [@mer99] conversion in atomic Pb vapor with almost unity photon-conversion efficiency. The aim of the present paper is to extend these ideas to the case of THz generation, treating an interaction of the e.m. radiation with atoms as well as the propagation of radiation through the medium in exact manner.
We suggest that the THz radiation can be produced by the EIT-assisted frequency conversion in media where three discrete states may be selected, two of them being metastable ones. An example of such a scheme is a closed three-level $\Lambda $ system (Fig. 1), where $\left| 1\right\rangle -\left|
3\right\rangle $ and $\left| 2\right\rangle -\left| 3\right\rangle $ are the dipole-allowed optical transitions, and the frequency of a magnetic-dipole transition $\left| 1\right\rangle -\left| 2\right\rangle $ is in the THz range. Such systems can be found in vapors of alkaline-earth atoms with the corresponding states $\left| 1\right\rangle \equiv \,^3P_0$ or $\,^3P_2$, $%
\left| 2\right\rangle \equiv \,^3P_1$ and $\left| 3\right\rangle \equiv
\,^3S_1$. Frequencies of the transitions $\,^3P_0\,-$ $\,^3P_1$ and $%
\,\,^3P_2\,-\,^3P_1$ are 0.6 and 1.2 THz for $^{24}$Mg, 1.5 and 3.2 THz for $%
^{40}$Ca, etc. A similar $\Lambda $ system can be excited, for instance, in samarium atoms where the transition between two substates $\,4f^66s^2\,^7F_0$ and $^7F_1$ of the ground state fine structure has a frequency of 8.78 THz. One may also find appropriate schemes in other atoms, where the THz transition is usually between the two fine structure components, and probably in some molecules and doped crystals as well.
Let us assume that the $\Lambda $ atom interacts with a bichromatic optical field $${\bf E}(z,t)=\,\sum\limits_{m=1,2}{\bf e}_{3m}E_{3m}(z,t)\frac 12\exp \left[
-i\left( \omega _{3m}t-k_{3m}z+\varphi _{3m}(z,t)\right) \right] +c.c.
\label{E}$$ having the frequencies $\omega _{3m}$ resonant or near-resonant with transitions $\left| m\right\rangle -\left| 3\right\rangle ,\,\,m=1,2$, and with the radiation of THz frequency $\omega _T$$${\bf H}(z,t)=\,{\bf e}_TH(z,t)\frac 12\exp \left[ -i\left( \omega
_Tt-k_Tz+\varphi _T(z,t)\right) \right] +c.c., \label{H}$$ resonant with transition $\left| 1\right\rangle -\left| 2\right\rangle $. Here, $E_{3m}$ and $H$ are the amplitudes, ${\bf e}_{3m}$ and ${\bf e}_T$ are the unit polarization vectors, $\varphi _{3m}$ and $\varphi _T$ are the phases, and $k_{3m}=\omega _{3m}/c$ and $k_T=\omega _T/c$ are the wavenumbers of electric and magnetic field, respectively. Both the amplitudes $E_{3m}$,$\,\,H$ and the phases $\varphi _{3m}$, $\varphi _T$ are regarded as slowly varying functions of time and coordinate.
The propagation of e.m. waves along the $z$ axis in the medium is governed by the Maxwell equations. In the slowly varying amplitude and phase approximation, these equations can be transformed to the following form [@scbook; @kos95; @kors99]:
\[Maxw1\] $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{\partial E_{3m}}{\partial z}+\frac 1c\frac{\partial E_{3m}}{\partial t}
&=&-N\frac{4\pi d_{3m}\omega _{3m}}c%
%TCIMACRO{\func{Im} }%
%BeginExpansion
\mathop{\rm Im}%
%EndExpansion
(\tilde{\sigma}_{3m}), \\
\frac{\partial \varphi _{3m}}{\partial z}+\frac 1c\frac{\partial \varphi
_{3m}}{\partial t} &=&-N\frac{4\pi d_{3m}\omega _{3m}}c\frac 1{E_{3m}}%
%TCIMACRO{\func{Re} }%
%BeginExpansion
\mathop{\rm Re}%
%EndExpansion
(\tilde{\sigma}_{3m}), \\
\frac{\partial H}{\partial z}+\frac 1c\frac{\partial H}{\partial t} &=&-N%
\frac{4\pi \mu \omega _T}c%
%TCIMACRO{\func{Im} }%
%BeginExpansion
\mathop{\rm Im}%
%EndExpansion
(\tilde{\sigma}_{21}), \\
\frac{\partial \varphi _T}{\partial z}+\frac 1c\frac{\partial \varphi _T}{%
\partial t} &=&-N\frac{4\pi \mu \omega _T}c\frac 1H%
%TCIMACRO{\func{Re} }%
%BeginExpansion
\mathop{\rm Re}%
%EndExpansion
(\tilde{\sigma}_{21}),\end{aligned}$$ where $d_{3m}\equiv \left| {\bf e}_{3m}{\bf d}_{3m}\right| ,\,\mu \equiv
\left| {\bf e}_T\vec{\mu}\right| $, ${\bf d}_{3m}$ and $\vec{\mu}$ are the matrix elements of the electric-dipole moment operator ${\bf \hat{d}}$ and the magnetic-dipole moment operator ${\bf \hat{\mu}}$, respectively, in the basis of bare atomic states $|n\rangle ,\,n=1,2,3$: ${\bf d}_{3m}\equiv
\langle 3|{\bf \hat{d}}|m\rangle $, $\vec{\mu}\equiv \langle 1|{\bf \hat{\mu}%
}|2\rangle $; $N$ is the density of the active atoms. The medium polarization components (the right-hand side of Eqs. (\[Maxw1\])) are determined by the density matrix elements $\sigma _{ns}$ averaged over the atomic velocities with the distribution $w\left( v_z\right) $ where $v_z$ is the $z$-projection of the atom velocity:
$$\tilde{\sigma}_{ns}=\int\limits_{-\infty }^{+\infty }dv_z\,w\left(
v_z\right) \sigma _{ns}, \label{sigma-av}$$
with $$\sigma _{ns}=\rho _{ns}\left( v_z\right) \exp \left[ i\left( \omega
_{ns}t-k_{ns}z+\chi _{ns}\right) \right] , \label{sigma}$$ where $\rho _{ns}\equiv \langle n|\hat{\rho}|s\rangle $, ${\hat{\rho}}$ is the atomic density matrix; and the phase $\chi _{ns}$ is the sum of the e.m. field phase $\varphi _{ns}$ and the phase $\vartheta _{ns}$ of the atomic dipole moment ${\bf d}_{3m}=\left| {\bf d}_{3m}\right| {\rm e}^{i\vartheta
_{3m}}$, ${\bf \vec{\mu}}=\left| {\bf \vec{\mu}}\right| {\rm e}^{i\vartheta
_{12}}$: $\chi _{3m}=\varphi _{3m}+\vartheta _{3m}$, $\chi _{12}=\varphi
_T+\vartheta _{12}$.
The $\Lambda $ system represents a typical interaction scheme where the interference of excitation channels may lead to creation of a dark state and preparation of atoms in this state [@cptrev]. If the e.m. field between the states $\left| 1\right\rangle $ and $\left| 2\right\rangle $ is not applied then the following superposition of the metastable states $$\left| NC\right\rangle =\frac{g_{32}/g_{31}}{\sqrt{1+g_{32}^2/g_{31}^2}}%
\left| 1\right\rangle -\exp \left( \chi _{32}-\chi _{31}\right) \frac 1{%
\sqrt{1+g_{32}^2/g_{31}^2}}\left| 2\right\rangle , \label{NC}$$ gets completely decoupled from the field when the two-photon resonance condition is satisfied: $$\Delta _{32}-\Delta _{31}=0. \label{2ph-cond}$$ In Eqs. (\[NC\]) and (\[2ph-cond\]), $g_{3m}=d_{3m}E_{3m}/2\hbar $ are the Rabi frequencies of the optical fields, $\Delta _{3m}=\omega
_{3m}-\left( {\cal E}_3-{\cal E}_m\right) /\hbar $ are the laser frequency detunings from transitions $\left| m\right\rangle -\left| 3\right\rangle
,\,(\,m=1,2)$, ${\cal E}_n$ is the eigenenergy of the atomic state $\left|
n\right\rangle $. The superposition $\left| NC\right\rangle $ is stable, and it is fed by spontaneous emission from the level $\left| 3\right\rangle $ so that all the atomic population is trapped in $\left| NC\right\rangle $ after some optical pumping time. Therefore, the light ceases to interact with atoms and propagates through the medium without absorption and refraction. We note that this occurs for any relation between the laser intensities and phases.
At the same time, the preparation of atoms in the superposition of metastable states $\left| 1\right\rangle $ and $\left| 2\right\rangle $ means that the coherence $\sigma _{12}$ is induced. Corresponding to the Eqs. (\[Maxw1\] c,d), this should lead to a generation of the field with frequency $\left( \omega _{31}-\omega _{32}\right) $. Such an EIT-assisted generation of a microwave radiation has recently been observed in atomic Cs vapor [@god98]. In general, the presence of a third e.m. field destroys the dark state, so that the optical waves start to interact with the medium. However, the degree of the destruction is very small if the generated field is weak. In the present case, the THz generation corresponds to the difference-frequency generation scheme [@boyd]. If we suppose the photon conversion efficiency to be unity, that is for each photon of frequency $%
\omega _{31}$ one THz-photon (and one photon of frequency $\omega _{32}$) is generated, then the maximum energy (or power) conversion efficiency is given by $\eta =\hbar \omega _T/\hbar \omega _{31}\ll 1$. For example, for the $%
\Lambda $ system ($3^3P_1-3\,^3P_2-$ $\,4^3S_1$) in $^{24}$Mg, we have $%
\omega _T=1.22\cdot 10^{12}$ Hz, $\omega _{31}=5.80\cdot 10^{14}$ Hz, and $%
\eta =0.0021$. Therefore, the THz intensity is always much smaller than the optical one, so that the dark state disturbance is always very small. Thus, the total e.m. energy dissipation in the medium is negligible, and one can hope to get a very efficient generation in such a nearly dark (”grey”) medium.
In this paper we concentrate on a regime of the radiation propagation in a continuous wave limit, that is, we shall assume that the characteristic time of a change in the field amplitudes and phases, and the interaction time of atoms with the radiation are much longer than the characteristic time of a change in the internal state of an atom. Then, the time derivatives in Eqs. (\[Maxw1\]) can be dropped, and the steady-state values of the density matrix elements $\sigma _{ns}$ can be used in the right-hand side of Eqs. (\[Maxw1\]). The system considered here is an example of the so-called closed-loop system, where the steady state can be established only when the multi-photon resonance condition is satisfied [@kos92]: $$\omega _{31}-\omega _{32}-\omega _T=0. \label{mp-res}$$ In what follows we will always assume the condition (\[mp-res\]) to be fulfilled.
The density matrix equations for the $\Lambda $ atom can be found in Refs. [@kos95; @kos92]. These equations can be solved analytically under some simplifying conditions. We suppose that spontaneous relaxation rates for the channels $\left| 3\right\rangle \rightarrow \left| 1\right\rangle $ and $%
\left| 3\right\rangle \rightarrow \left| 2\right\rangle $ are equal: $\gamma
_{31}=$ $\gamma _{32}\equiv \gamma $. With the condition $\omega
_{31}\approx \omega _{32}$ (since $\left( \omega _{31}-\omega _{32}\right)
/\omega _{31}=\omega _T/\omega _{31}\ll 1$) this would also imply $\left|
{\bf d}_{31}\right| \approx \left| {\bf d}_{32}\right| $. This simplification allows us to get analytical results which demonstrate all the basic features of the process. Numerical calculations with real atomic parameters (Figs. 2-4) confirm the analytical results not only qualitatively, but even quantitatively. This suggests that the performance of the proposed scheme is not very sensitive to exact values of the relaxation rates and dipole moments on optical transitions. Another assumption used is quite reasonable. Since the THz radiation intensity is very small, we assume that its Rabi frequency is small: $g_T=\mu H/2\hbar $ $%
\ll \gamma $.
Solution of the steady-state density matrix equations for $v_z=0$, $\Gamma
=0 $ ($\Gamma $ is the relaxation rate of the coherence between states $%
\left| 1\right\rangle $ and $\left| 2\right\rangle $), equal spontaneous relaxation rates: $\gamma _{31}=\gamma _{32}\equiv \gamma $, and zero detunings $\Delta _{31}=\Delta _{32}=0$, gives to the first order in $\left(
g_T\,/\,\gamma \right) $:
\[ims\] $$\begin{aligned}
%TCIMACRO{\func{Im} }%
%BeginExpansion
\mathop{\rm Im}%
%EndExpansion
(\sigma _{31}) &=&\frac{g_Tg_{32}}{g_0^2}\sin \Phi , \\
%TCIMACRO{\func{Im} }%
%BeginExpansion
\mathop{\rm Im}%
%EndExpansion
(\sigma _{32}) &=&-\frac{g_Tg_{31}}{g_0^2}\sin \Phi , \\
%TCIMACRO{\func{Im} }%
%BeginExpansion
\mathop{\rm Im}%
%EndExpansion
(\sigma _{21}) &=&-\frac{g_{31}g_{32}}{g_0^2}\sin \Phi ,\end{aligned}$$
\[res\] $$\begin{aligned}
%TCIMACRO{\func{Re} }%
%BeginExpansion
\mathop{\rm Re}%
%EndExpansion
(\sigma _{31}) &=&-\frac{g_Tg_{32}\left( g_{32}^2-g_{31}^2\right) }{g_0^4}%
\cos \Phi , \\
%TCIMACRO{\func{Re} }%
%BeginExpansion
\mathop{\rm Re}%
%EndExpansion
(\sigma _{32}) &=&\frac{g_Tg_{31}\left( g_{32}^2-g_{31}^2\right) }{g_0^4}%
\cos \Phi , \\
%TCIMACRO{\func{Re} }%
%BeginExpansion
\mathop{\rm Re}%
%EndExpansion
(\sigma _{21}) &=&-\frac{g_{31}g_{32}}{g_0^2}\cos \Phi ,\end{aligned}$$ The populations of the metastable states are
$$\begin{aligned}
\rho _{11} &=&\frac{g_{32}^2}{g_0^2}-\frac{2g_Tg_{31}g_{32}\gamma }{g_0^4}%
\sin \Phi , \\
\rho _{22} &=&\frac{g_{31}^2}{g_0^2}+\frac{2g_Tg_{31}g_{32}\gamma }{g_0^4}%
\sin \Phi ,\end{aligned}$$
where $g_0^2=g_{31}^2+g_{32}^2$, and the relative phase $\Phi $ is determined as $$\Phi =\left( \chi _{31}-\chi _{32}\right) -\chi _{12}. \label{Phi}$$ The excited state population $\rho _{33}$, which is responsible for irreversible dissipation of the e.m. energy by the medium, is of the second order in $\left( g_T\,/\,\gamma \right) $. This indicates that atoms are really in the grey state. One sees from Eqs. (\[ims\]) and (\[res\]), that the medium is absolutely transparent and not refractive for $$\Phi =\pi n,\,\,n=0,1,2,... \label{phi-cond}$$ and $$g_{31}=g_{32}. \label{g-cond}$$ These are exactly the conditions for the dark state in closed $\Lambda $ system [@kos95; @kos92; @buck86; @kos91].
For arbitrary optical field amplitudes and phases, however, the refraction and absorption (or amplification) of individual frequency components may be substantial. The change of the fields can be calculated analytically by the method developed in paper by Armstrong [*et. al.*]{} [@arm62]. We insert the density matrix elements (\[ims\]) and (\[res\]) in the Maxwell equations (\[Maxw1\]). The amplitude equations are read then:
\[Maxw2\] $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{dE_{31}}{dz} &=&-\frac{\pi N}{\hbar ^2c}\frac{d_{31}d_{32}\mu }{g_0^2}%
\omega _{31}E_{32}H\sin \Phi , \\
\frac{dE_{32}}{dz} &=&\frac{\pi N}{\hbar ^2c}\frac{d_{31}d_{32}\mu }{g_0^2}%
\omega _{32}E_{31}H\sin \Phi , \\
\frac{dH}{dz} &=&\frac{\pi N}{\hbar ^2c}\frac{d_{31}d_{32}\mu }{g_0^2}\omega
_TE_{31}E_{32}\sin \Phi .\end{aligned}$$ The intensities associated with each of these waves are given by $I_{3m}=$ $%
\left( c/8\pi \right) E_{3m}^2\,$and $\,I_T=$ $\left( c/8\pi \right) H^2$. The set of equations (\[Maxw2\]) shows that the total power flow (proportional to the total intensity $I=I_{31}+I_{32}+I_T$) is conserved, as expected for propagation through a lossless (due to EIT) medium:
$$\frac{dI}{dz}=\frac{dI_{31}}{dz}+\frac{dI_{32}}{dz}+\frac{dI_T}{dz}=\frac N{%
4\hbar ^2}\frac{d_{31}d_{32}\mu }{g_0^2}\left( \omega _{32}+\omega _T-\omega
_{31}\right) E_{31}E_{32}H\sin \Phi =0,$$ where the last equality follows from the multiphoton resonance condition (\[mp-res\]). Obviously, the energy losses (proportional to the population of the excited state $\rho _{33}$) appear only in the second order in $%
\left( g_T\,/\,\gamma \right) $.
The set of equations (\[Maxw2\]) also implies that $$\frac d{dz}\left( \frac{I_{31}}{\hbar \omega _{31}}\right) =-\frac d{dz}%
\left( \frac{I_{32}}{\hbar \omega _{32}}\right) =-\frac d{dz}\left( \frac{I_T%
}{\hbar \omega _T}\right) , \label{M-R}$$ which are the well-known Manley-Rowe relations [@boyd]. These relations tell us that the rate at which photons at frequency $\omega _T$ are created is equal to the rate at which photons at frequency $\omega _{32}$ are created and is equal to the rate at which photons at frequency $\omega _{32}$ are destroyed.
In order to solve the Maxwell equations, we introduce the following dimensionless variables: field amplitudes $$\begin{aligned}
u_m &=&\left( \frac{8\pi }cI\frac{\omega _{3m}}{\omega _0}\right)
^{-1/2}E_{3m}\,,\,\,\,(m=1,2), \\
u_T &=&\left( \frac{8\pi }cI\frac{\omega _T}{\omega _0}\right) ^{-1/2}H,\end{aligned}$$ where $\omega _0=\left( \omega _{31}+\omega _{32}+\omega _T\right) /2$, and a dimensionless optical length $\zeta =\kappa z$ with the coefficient $$\kappa =\frac{4\pi N}c\frac{d_{31}d_{32}\mu }{g_0^2}\left( \frac{8\pi }c%
\frac I{\omega _0}\right) ^{1/2}\sqrt{\omega _T\omega _{31}\omega _{32}}.$$
As we have discussed above, the THz intensity is always much smaller than the optical one: $I_T\ll I_{31}+I_{32}$. Therefore, we can safely assume that the total optical intensity $I_{31}+I_{32}\approx I$ is conserved. This follows also from the first of the Manley-Rowe relations (\[M-R\]) taking into account the relation $\omega _{31}\approx \omega _{32}\approx \omega _0$ (one can infer that an error in making such an approximation is of the order of $\eta =\left( \omega _{31}-\omega _{32}\right) /\omega _{31}=\omega
_T/\omega _{31}\ll 1$). The conservation of the optical intensity may be written in variables $u_m$ as follows: $$u_1^2(\zeta )+u_2^2(\zeta )=1. \label{C1}$$ Other ”constants of motion” following from the Manley-Rowe relations (\[M-R\]) are: $$\begin{aligned}
u_1^2(\zeta )+u_T^2(\zeta ) &=&B, \label{C2} \\
u_T^2(\zeta )-u_2^2(\zeta ) &=&C, \label{C3}\end{aligned}$$ where constants $B$ and $C$ are determined from the boundary conditions at the $\zeta =0$.
Taking into account the assumed above closed values of the optical dipole moments: $d_{31}\approx d_{32}$ , one concludes that the quantity $g_0^2$ is also approximately constant over all the optical path, and it is approximately equal to $\left( 2\pi d_{31}^2/\hbar ^2c\right) I$. All this allows one to write the amplitude and the phase Maxwell equations in variables $u_m,\Phi $ as follows:
\[Maxw3\] $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{du_1}{d\zeta } &=&-u_2u_T\sin \Phi , \\
\frac{du_2}{d\zeta } &=&u_1u_T\sin \Phi , \\
\frac{du_T}{d\zeta } &=&u_1u_2\sin \Phi , \\
\frac{d\Phi }{d\zeta } &=&\frac{u_T^2\left( u_2^2-u_1^2\right) -u_1^2u_2^2}{%
u_1u_2u_T}\cos \Phi ,\end{aligned}$$ where we have assumed that the atomic dipole phases $\vartheta _{ns}$ do not change along the propagation path. The optical length can now be re-written as:
$$\zeta =\frac{\pi N}{\hbar ^2c}\mu \left( \frac{8\pi }cI\right) ^{-1/2}\sqrt{%
\omega _T\omega _0}z. \label{zeta}$$
The constants (\[C1\]), (\[C2\]) reduce the problem to solve of the set consisting of the first and the last of Eqs. (\[Maxw3\]). The right-hand side of Eq. (\[Maxw3\] d) can be transformed to the following form by use of the first three Eqs. (\[Maxw3\]): $$\frac{u_T^2\left( u_2^2-u_1^2\right) -u_1^2u_2^2}{u_1u_2u_T}\cos \Phi =\frac{%
\cos \Phi }{\sin \Phi }\frac 1{u_1u_2u_T}\frac{d\left( u_1u_2u_T\right) }{%
d\zeta }.$$ Therefore, the equation for the phase can be re-written as $$\frac{d\Phi }{d\zeta }=\frac{\cos \Phi }{\sin \Phi }\frac d{d\zeta }\left(
\ln \left( u_1u_2u_T\right) \right) ,$$ which can immediately be integrated to give the fourth constant of motion: $$u_1u_2u_T\cos \Phi =\Pi . \label{const4}$$ The value of the constant $\Pi $ can be determined from the known values of $%
u_i$ and $\Phi $ at the entrance to the medium, $\zeta =0$. The expression (\[const4\]) is used then to express $\sin \Phi =\sqrt{1-\cos ^2\Phi }$ in terms of the conserved quantity $\Pi $, and substitute it, together with the constants given in Eqs.(\[C1\]), (\[C2\]), into the Eq. (\[Maxw3\] a). This gives: $$\zeta =\pm \frac 12%
%TCIMACRO{\dint }%
%BeginExpansion
\displaystyle\int %
%EndExpansion
\limits_{u_1^2(\zeta =0)}^{u_1^2}\frac{d\left( u_1^2\right) }{\sqrt{%
u_1^2\left( 1-u_1^2\right) \left( B-u_1^2\right) -\Pi ^2}}. \label{EllF}$$ The integral in Eq. (\[EllF\]) can be reduced to the elliptic integral. In this paper we consider the case of the THz radiation generation. This situation corresponds to $u_T(\zeta =0)=0,\,B=u_{10}^2\equiv u_1^2(\zeta
=0),\,\Pi =0$, and to the constant $\cos \Phi $: $$\cos \Phi (\zeta )=0. \label{cos0}$$ Introduction of a quantity $y=u_1/u_{10}$ leads to the elliptic integral of the first kind [@abr] in standard form: $$\zeta =\pm
%TCIMACRO{\dint}%
%BeginExpansion
\displaystyle\int %
%EndExpansion
\limits_{y_0}^y\frac{dy}{\sqrt{\left( 1-y^2\right) \left(
1-u_{10}^2y^2\right) }}.$$ The solution can be written then through sinus Jacobi elliptic functions:
\[sn\] $$\begin{aligned}
u_1^2(\zeta ) &=&u_{10}^2 sn^2\left[ \left( \zeta +\zeta _0\right) ;u_{10}%
\right] , \\
u_2^2(\zeta ) &=&1-u_{10}^2 sn^2\left[ \left( \zeta +\zeta _0\right) ;u_{10}%
\right] , \\
u_T^2(\zeta ) &=&u_{10}^2\left( 1- sn^2\left[ \left( \zeta +\zeta _0\right)
;u_{10}\right] \right) .\end{aligned}$$ The solution indicates that as the optical length increases, energy is periodically transferred between the e.m. waves. The initial condition $%
u_T(\zeta =0)=0$ requires that the constant $\zeta _0$ is equal to $\pm {\bf %
K}(u_{10})$, the complete elliptic integral
$${\bf K}(u_{10})=%
%TCIMACRO{\dint}%
%BeginExpansion
\displaystyle\int %
%EndExpansion
\limits_0^1\frac{dy}{\sqrt{\left( 1-y^2\right) \left( 1-u_{10}^2y^2\right) }}%
,$$ which is a quarter-period of the function $sn$. Thus, the period of intensity oscillations is equal to $2{\bf K}(u_{10})$ and the maximum possible power transferred to the THz radiation: $u_T^2=u_{10}^2$ occurs in a length $$\zeta _{max}={\bf K}(u_{10}). \label{zmax}$$ The value of the function ${\bf K}(u_{10})$ is close to $\pi /2$ at $%
u_{10}\ll 1$ and it is increased with $u_{10}$ up to infinity at the limit $%
u_{10}=1$ [@abr]. For $u_{20}^2=1-u_{10}^2\ll 1$ a half period can be approximated by $${\bf K}(u_{10})=\frac 12\ln \left( \frac{16}{u_{20}^2}\right) \label{kln}$$
In terms of the real intensity, the Eq. (\[sn\] c) for the THz radiation can be written: $$I_T(\zeta )=I_{31}(\zeta =0)\frac{\omega _T}{\omega _{31}}\left( 1-cd^2\left[
\zeta ;u_{10}\right] \right) . \label{IT}$$ We observe that at the length $\zeta _{max}={\bf K}(u_{10})$ the optical field is converted into the THz radiation with unity photon efficiency.
The obtained results are confirmed by numerical calculations of the Maxwell equations (\[Maxw1\]) with full density matrix calculations without any approximation. Figure 2 demonstrates the evolution of the e.m. wave intensities and the relative phase $\Phi $ with the length for real parameters of the $3^3P_1-\,3^3P_2-4\,^3S_1$ system in $^{24}$Mg atomic vapor. The optical length in this and all following figures is plotted in terms of a single-atom absorption cross-section for the optical field $\tau
=\left( 3\pi c^2/2\omega _{_{31}}^2\right) Nz$, which has an advantage of being independent of total intensity $I$. The length $\zeta $ introduced in Eq. (\[zeta\]) is connected to $\tau $ by $$\zeta =\tau \frac \mu {d_{31}}\sqrt{\frac{\omega _T}{\omega _{31}}}\left(
\frac{\hbar \gamma _{31}}{d_{31}}\right) \left( \frac{8\pi }cI\right)
^{-1/2}.$$ In order to compare the numerical and analytical calculations, the results presented in Fig. 2 are calculated for $\Gamma =0$, $\Delta _{31}=\Delta
_{32}=0$, and vapor temperature $T=10^{-3}K$ (i.e., in fact, for $v_z=0$). However, the atomic data (wavelengths, dipole moments and decay rates) are real. In particular, the spontaneous relaxation rates are not equal: $\gamma
_{32}=1.66\gamma _{31}$. The intensities at the entrance to the medium are chosen so that $u_{20}^2=0.59\cdot 10^{-4}$. The dotted line in Fig. 2(b) is a calculation with formula (\[IT\]) for $u_{20}^2=0.55\cdot 10^{-4}$. One can see that the correspondence not only in the shape but also in quantitative characteristics of the process is excellent. The difference in parameter $u_{20}^2$ is obviously due to the difference of spontaneous relaxation rates. As expected from analytical calculations, the transfer of energy to the THz radiation occurs with unity photon efficiency (the maximum value of $I_T$ is exactly equal to $0.0021I_{31}(\zeta =0)$) at the length $%
\tau _{max}=7.6\cdot 10^5$ ($\zeta _{max}=5.87$, this value is quite close to that calculated from Eq. (\[kln\]) for $u_{20}^2=0.59\cdot 10^{-4}$: $%
\zeta _{max}=6.25$). Such a perfect frequency conversion is due to the negligible decay of the dark state given by $\Gamma $ and terms to the second order in $g_T\,/\,\gamma $. For the parameters of Fig. 2, the maximum THz intensity $I_T=0.0021I_{31}(\zeta =0)$ corresponds to the Rabi frequency of only $g_T\approx 8\cdot 10^{-4}\,\gamma _{31}$. The behavior of the phase $\Phi $ in Fig. 2(c) also follows the law $\cos \Phi (\zeta )=0$ obtained analytically. The jumps in the phase occur at points where the intensity of the field being absorbed approaches zero, according to Eqs. (\[Maxw1\] (b,d)).
In reality, however, we do have both the Doppler broadening and the relaxation rate $\Gamma $ of the coherence between states $\left|
1\right\rangle $ and $\left| 2\right\rangle $. Quantitatively, this considerably modifies the process. In Fig. 3 the spatial dependence of the field intensities and the phase $\Phi $ are plotted for the vapor temperature $T=800$ $K$ (this gives the saturated vapor density of $%
N=1.7\cdot 10^{15}\,cm^{-3}$ and corresponds to the most probable velocity of atoms of $v_p=7.5\cdot 10^4\,cm/sec$), $\Gamma =10^{-4}\gamma _{31}$ (0.6 kHz), input Rabi frequencies $g_{31}\left( \tau =0\right) =60\gamma
_{31},\,\,g_{32}\left( \tau =0\right) =20\gamma _{31}$ (corresponding to laser intensities of $I_{31}=18.8\,W/cm^2$ and $I_{32}=2.1\,W/cm^2$). We see that the dynamics of the intensities and the phase does not change qualitatively as compared to the case of negligible decay of the dark state (Fig. 2). The THz radiation is generated and reaches its maximum, $%
I_T=39\,mW/cm^2$ (Rabi frequency $g_T\approx 4.6\cdot 10^{-3}\,\gamma _{31}$) at the length $\tau =2.2\cdot 10^6$ (for $T=800$ $K$ this corresponds to the real length of the gas cell of $z=4\,cm$). A minor quantitative difference compared to the Fig. 2 case is that the optical length scale of the oscillations increases. This is simply a consequence of the optical length dependence on the total intensity, Eq. (\[zeta\]). However, the Doppler broadening, together with the rate $\Gamma $, considerably influence the efficiency of the frequency conversion. The efficiency reaches a maximum when the atoms are prepared in an almost dark state so that the energy dissipation is very weak. The dark state preparation relies in present case on the optical pumping. Therefore, the optical pumping rate should be much larger than the dark state decay in order to allow the population trapping in $\left| NC\right\rangle $. This requirement results in the following condition [@kors97]: $$\frac{g_0^2}{\gamma ^2+\Delta ^2}\gg \frac \Gamma \gamma ,$$ where detuning $\Delta $ includes the Doppler shift: $\Delta =\Delta
_{31}-k_{31}v_z\approx \Delta _{32}-k_{32}v_z$. For the resonance $\Delta
_{31}=\Delta _{32}=0$ and large Doppler broadening $k_{31}v_p\gg \gamma $, this condition reduces to $$g_0^2\gg \frac \Gamma \gamma \left( k_{31}v_p\right) ^2 \label{g0-cond}$$ or, in terms of intensity, $$I\gg \frac \Gamma \gamma \left( \frac{k_{31}v_p}\gamma \right) ^2\frac{16\pi
^2\hbar \gamma c}{3\lambda _{31}^3}. \label{I-cond}$$ For the here considered case of $^{24}$Mg atoms at temperature $800K$, the total input intensity should be larger than $3.75\cdot 10^3\cdot \Gamma
/\gamma $ \[W/cm$^2$\]. An importance of the condition (\[g0-cond\]) is demonstrated in Fig. 4. While the efficiency is approaching maximum: $\eta
=2.06\cdot 10^{-3}$, for the parameters of Fig. 3 where $\Gamma /\gamma
=10^{-4}$, it drops to $\eta =1.66\cdot 10^{-3}$ for $\Gamma /\gamma =2\cdot
10^{-3}$ in Fig. 4 (a). Moreover, the intensity oscillations decay quite fast, and at the length $\tau \geq 4\cdot 10^6$ ($\zeta \geq 4.87$) the optical fields are completely absorbed by the medium (not shown). Increase of the input intensity in Fig. 4 (b) leads to better trapping, weaker e.m. energy dissipation and, correspondingly, to larger conversion efficiency increasing to $\eta =2.00\cdot 10^{-3}$. Of course, with increasing input intensity the length scale of the conversion increases as well. Parameters of Fig. 4 (b) correspond to input intensities $I_{31}=470\,W/cm^2$ and $%
I_{32}=52\,W/cm^2$, and to the maximum THz intensity of $I_T=0.94\,W/cm^2$ (Rabi frequency $g_T\approx 2.3\cdot 10^{-2}\,\gamma _{31}$) generated at $%
\tau =1.1\cdot 10^7$ ($z=20\,cm$).
Thus, a practical realization of the proposed here generation scheme requires large optical length (large atom density), fairly large input intensities of the optical fields and small decay rate $\Gamma $ of the atomic coherence $\sigma _{12}$. The rate $\Gamma $ is determined by uncorrelated laser fluctuations, atomic collisions and other random phase disturbing processes. It has recently been experimentally demonstrated that, in a buffer gas, the coherence $\sigma _{12}$ can survive a very large number of atomic collisions [@wyn97; @xu98]. For instance, the rate $%
\Gamma <50\,Hz$ has been observed in experiment [@wyn97]. The correlation of the fluctuations in $\omega _{31}$ and $\omega _{32}$ radiations may be achieved if, for example, the $\omega _{32}$ frequency is generated from $\omega _{31}$ by operation of a Raman laser, as in Ref. [@welleg].
An important point in nonlinear frequency conversion is a phase matching. In our scheme, however, the optical frequencies are quite close in magnitude to each other. Therefore, the wave vectors $k_{3m}$ change approximately equally due to dispersion of the medium, induced by the interaction with far-detuned states other than those of the $\Lambda $ system. Thus, this phase mismatch may be neglected. Moreover, as it has been shown theoretically and experimentally [@jain96], the phase mismatch can be compensated for by very small value of two-photon detuning $\left( \Delta
_{31}-\Delta _{32}\right) $, if it does appear.
In the particular case of Mg atoms, considered here as an illustrative example, the metastable states $3^3P_1$ and $\,3^3P_2$ are not the ground states. Therefore, one has to prepare an atomic ensemble in metastable states. This problem may be solved, for example, through a low-energy high-current electric discharge [@god93]. Another problem is that the state $3^3P_1$ decays spontaneously to the ground state $3^1S_0$. However, the rate of this decay, $4.3\cdot 10^2\,sec^{-1}=1.2\cdot 10^{-5}\,\gamma
_{31}$ is too slow to produce considerable effect on the process, presented here. Of course, all these problems may be avoided if one uses atoms with the metastable states $\left| 1\right\rangle $ and $\left| 2\right\rangle $ being the ground states, like in Sm atoms.
In conclusion, we have proposed a scheme for generation of continuous-wave THz radiation. Our scheme is based on a nonlinear interaction of three e.m. waves in atomic media with a $\Lambda $ configuration of levels. An important ingredient of the scheme is a preparation of atoms in the grey state. As a consequence, the e.m. fields propagate through the medium with very weak dissipation of energy. Therefore the process may be considered as a parametric difference-frequency generation, where the THz frequency is the difference between two optical ones. We have obtained an analytical solution of the e.m. propagation problem which demonstrates that the intensities oscillate along the propagation path in a form of Jacobi elliptic functions. This allows us to predict that the photon conversion efficiency approaches unity in this technique, and to estimate the optical length at which the energy transfer from the optical field into the THz one is maximum. The analytical solution is confirmed by numerical calculations taking into account Doppler broadening and relaxation of the grey state. These calculations show that the efficiency of the THz generation remains still very high in real situations, if the input optical intensity is sufficiently high to satisfy the condition (\[I-cond\]). We note finally that the tuning of obtained THz radiation may be realized by shifting the metastable state energies via strong static magnetic or/and electric fields.
Acknowledgments
===============
We are very grateful to Prof. L. Windholz for his continuous interest to this work and useful discussions. D.V. Kosachiov thanks the members of the Institut für Experimentalphysik, TU Graz, for hospitality and support. This study was supported by the Austrian Science Foundation under project No. P 12894-PHY.
E. Korsunsky’s e-mail address is [email protected].
Special issue on ”Terahertz electromagnetic pulse generation, physics, and applications”, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. B [**11**]{}, No. 12, 2454-2581 (1994).
F. Strumia, ”A proposal for a new absolute frequency standard, using a Mg or Ca atomic beam”, Metrologia [**8**]{}, 85-90 (1972).
A. Godone and C. Novero, ”The magnesium frequency standard”, Metrologia [**30**]{}, 163-181 (1993).
S.E. Harris, ”Electromagnetically induced transparency”, Physics Today [**50**]{}, No. 7, 36-42 (1997).
, ”Nonlinear optical processes using electromagnetically induced transparency”, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**64**]{}, 1107-1110 (1990).
G.Z. Zhang, D.W. Tokaryk, B.P. Stoicheff, and K. Hakuta, ”Nonlinear generation of extreme-ultraviolet radiation in atomic hydrogen using electromagnetically induced transparency”, Phys. Rev. A [**56**]{}, 813-819 (1997); D.W. Tokaryk, G.Z. Zhang, and B.P. Stoicheff, ”Nonlinear optical generation in a hydrogen discharge”, Phys. Rev. A [**59**]{}, 3116-3119 (1999).
, ”Continuous resonant four-wave mixing in double–$\Lambda $ level configurations of Na$_2$”, Opt. Lett. [**21**]{}, 1186-1188 (1996); [A. Apolonskii, S. Baluschev, U. Hinze, E. Tiemann, and B. Wellegehausen]{}, ”Continuous frequency up-conversion in double–$\Lambda $ scheme of Na$_2$”, Appl. Phys. B [**64**]{}, 435 (1997).
B. S. Ham, M. S. Shahriar, and P. R. Hemmer, ”Enhanced nondegenerate four-wave mixing owing to electromagnetically induced transparency in a spectral hole-burning crystal”, Opt. Lett. [**22**]{}, 1138-1140 (1997); ”Enhancement of four-wave mixing and line narrowing by use of quantum coherence in an optically dense double–$\Lambda $ solid”, Opt. Lett. [**24**]{}, 86-88 (1999).
M. Jain, H. Xia, G.Y. Yin, A.J. Merriam, and S.E. Harris, ”Efficient nonlinear frequency conversion with maximal atomic coherence”, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**77**]{}, 4326-4329 (1996).
A.J. Merriam, S.J. Sharpe, H. Xia, D. Manuszak, G.Y. Yin, and S.E. Harris, ”Efficient gas-phase generation of coherent vacuum ultraviolet radiation”, Opt. Lett. [**24**]{}, 625-627 (1999).
M.O. Scully and M.S. Zubairy, [*Quantum Optics*]{} (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).
D.V. Kosachiov, ”Resonant $\Lambda $ medium as a converter of the laser radiation frequency”, Kvant. Elektron. [**22**]{}, 1123 (1995) \[Quant. Electronics [**25**]{}, 1089 (1995)\].
E.A. Korsunsky and D.V. Kosachiov, ”Phase-dependent nonlinear optics with double-$\Lambda $ atoms”, Phys. Rev. A [**60**]{}, in press (1999).
E. Arimondo, ”Coherent population trapping in laser spectroscopy”, in: [*Progress in Optics*]{} [**35**]{}, 257-354, ed. E. Wolf (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1996).
A. Godone, F. Levy, and J. Vanier, ”Coherent microwave emission in cesium under coherent population trapping”, Phys. Rev. A [**59**]{}, R12-R15 (1999); J. Vanier, A. Godone, and F. Levy, ”Coherent population trapping in cesium: dark lines and coherent microwave emission”, Phys. Rev. A [**58**]{}, 2345-2358 (1998).
R.W. Boyd, [*Nonlinear Optics*]{} (Academic Press, San Diego, 1992).
D.V. Kosachiov, B.G. Matisov, and[ Yu.V. Rozhdestvensky]{}, ”Coherent phenomena in multilevel systems with closed interaction contour”, J. Phys. B [**25**]{}, 2473-2488 (1992).
S.J. Buckle, S.M. Barnett, P.L. Knight, M.A. Lauder, and D.T. Pegg, ”Atomic interferometers: phase-dependence in multilevel atomic transitions”, Opt. Acta [**33**]{}, 2473 (1986).
D. Kosachiov, B. Matisov, and Yu. Rozhdestvensky, ”Coherent population trapping: sensitivity of an atomic system to the relative phase of exciting fields”, Opt. Commun. [**85**]{}, 209 (1991).
J.A. Armstrong, N. Bloembergen, J. Ducuing, and P.S. Pershan, ”Interactions between light waves in a nonlinear dielectric”, Phys. Rev. [**127**]{}, 1918 (1962).
, ed. by M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun (Dover, New York, 1965).
E.A. Korsunsky, W. Maichen[, and L. Windholz]{}, ”Dynamics of coherent optical pumping in a sodium atomic beam”, Phys. Rev. A [**56**]{}, 3908-3915 (1997).
S. Brandt, A. Nagel, R. Wynands, and D. Meschede, ”Buffer-gas-induced linewidth reduction of coherent dark resonances to below 50 Hz”, Phys. Rev. A [**56**]{}, R1063-R1066 (1997).
J.H. Xu and G. Alzetta, ”High buffer gas pressure perturbation of coherent population trapping in sodium vapors”, Phys. Lett. A [**248**]{}, 80-85 (1998).
****
Fig. 1. Closed $\Lambda $ system with two metastable states $\left|
1\right\rangle $ and $\left| 2\right\rangle $. $\omega _{31}$ and $\omega
_{32}$ are the optical frequencies, $\omega _{T}$ is the THz-range frequency.
Fig. 2. Spatial variations of the optical (a) and THz (b) field intensities and the relative phase $\Phi $ (c) in a vapor of $^{24}$Mg atoms interacting with radiation in a closed $\Lambda $ configuration of levels $%
3^{3}P_{1}-3\,^{3}P_{2}-$ $\,4^{3}S_{1}$. For this system, the relaxation rates are $\gamma _{31}=3.46\cdot 10^{7}$ sec$^{-1}$, $\gamma
_{32}=1.66\gamma _{31}$, $\gamma _{21}=2.6\cdot 10^{-14}\gamma _{31}$, the wavelengths $\lambda _{31}=517.27\,nm$, $\lambda _{31}=518.36\,nm$. Other parameters are: vapor temperature $T=10^{-3}$ $K$, $\Gamma =0$, detunings $%
\Delta _{31}=\Delta _{32}=0$, Rabi frequencies of input fields $g_{31}\left(
\tau =0\right) =10\gamma _{31},\,\,g_{32}\left( \tau =0\right) =0.1\gamma
_{31}$ and $g_{12}\left( \tau =0\right) =0$. The dotted curve in (b) is a calculation with formula (\[IT\]) for $u_{20}^{2}=0.55\cdot 10^{-4}$.
Fig. 3. Spatial variations of the optical (a) and THz (b) field intensities and the relative phase $\Phi $ (c) in a vapor of $^{24}$Mg atoms for vapor temperature $T=800$ $K$, $\Gamma =10^{-4}\gamma _{31}$, detunings $\Delta
_{31}=\Delta _{32}=0$, Rabi frequencies of input fields $g_{31}\left( \tau
=0\right) =60\gamma _{31},\,\,g_{32}\left( \tau =0\right) =20\gamma _{31}$ and $g_{12}\left( \tau =0\right) =0$. Other parameters are the same as in Fig. 2.
Fig. 4. Spatial variations of the THz radiation intensity in a vapor of $%
^{24}$Mg atoms for $\Gamma =2\cdot 10^{-3}\gamma _{31}$ and Rabi frequencies of input fields: (a) $g_{31}\left( \tau =0\right) =60\gamma
_{31},\,\,g_{32}\left( \tau =0\right) =20\gamma _{31}$ and (b) $g_{31}\left(
\tau =0\right) =300\gamma _{31},\,\,g_{32}\left( \tau =0\right) =100\gamma
_{31}$. Other parameters are the same as in Fig. 3. Notice the different length scales in (a) and (b).
[^1]: permanent adress: Tyumentransgas Co, 627720 Yugorsk, Russia
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
author:
- 'E. Karamehmetoglu'
- 'C. Fransson'
- 'J. Sollerman'
- 'L. Tartaglia'
- 'F. Taddia'
- 'K. De'
- 'C. Fremling'
- 'A. Bagdasaryan'
- 'C. Barbarino'
- 'E. C. Bellm'
- 'R. Dekaney'
- 'A. M. Dugas'
- 'M. Giomi'
- 'A. Goobar'
- 'M. Graham'
- 'A. Ho'
- 'R. R. Laher'
- 'F. J. Masci'
- 'J. D. Neill'
- 'D. Perley'
- 'R. Riddle'
- 'B. Rusholme'
- 'M. T. Soumagnac'
bibliography:
- 'ZTFIbn\_ads.bib'
date: 'Received XXX; accepted XXX'
subtitle: Clues toward the origin of Type Ibn SNe from the Zwicky Transient Facility
title: 'The luminous and rapidly evolving SN 2018bcc:'
---
[Type Ibn supernovae (SNe) are rapidly-evolving and luminous (M$_\text{R,peak}$ $\sim-19$) transients interacting with He-rich circumstellar material (CSM). SN 2018bcc, detected by the ZTF shortly after explosion, provides the best constraints on the shape of the rising lightcurve of a fast Type Ibn.]{} [We use the high-quality data set of SN 2018bcc to study observational signatures of the class. Additionally, the powering mechanism of SN 2018bcc offers insights into the debated progenitor connection of Type Ibn SNe.]{} [Well-constrained lightcurve properties obtained from empirical models are compared with the literature. We fit the pseudo-bolometric lightcurve with semi-analytical models powered by radioactive decay and CSM interaction. The line profiles and emissivity of the prominent lines are modeled to study the formation of P-Cygni profiles and to estimate CSM properties.]{} [SN 2018bcc has a risetime to peak of $5.6^{+0.2}_{-0.1}$ days in the rest frame with a rising shape powerlaw index near 2, and seems to be a typical rapidly-evolving Type Ibn SN. The spectrum lacks signatures of SN-like ejecta and is dominated by over 15 He emission features at 20 days past peak, alongside Ca and Mg, all with V$_{\text{FWHM}} \sim 2000~\text{km}~\text{s}^{-1}$. The luminous and rapidly-evolving lightcurve can be powered by CSM interaction but not by the decay of radioactive . Modeling of the lines indicates a dense and optically thick CSM that can explain the P-Cygni profiles.]{} [Like other rapidly-evolving Type Ibn SNe, SN 2018bcc is a luminous transient with a rapid rise to peak powered by shock-interaction inside a dense and He-rich CSM. Its spectra do not support the existence of two Type Ibn spectral classes. We also note the remarkable observational match to pulsational pair instability (PPI) SN models.]{}
Introduction
============
Supernovae (SNe) Type Ibn and IIn are thought to be strongly interacting with the circumstellar material (CSM) surrounding their progenitor stars. The shocks created by the interaction between ejecta and CSM convert kinetic energy into radiation [e.g., @Chevalier2017]. The interaction also modifies the spectral features of SNe Ibn and IIn, as well as the luminosity and duration of their lightcurves (where one characterization of duration is risetime, often defined as the interval between the estimated explosion epoch and the peak of the lightcurve). The -n suffix represents the fact that Ibn and IIn SNe display strong and relatively narrow lines of He and H, respectively; presumably a direct signature of this interaction [e.g., @Smith2016].
Unlike the longer risetimes of the more common Type IIn SNe, several Type Ibn SNe have very fast lightcurves with risetimes of a few days followed by a similarly rapid decline [@Hosseinzadeh2017]. Such rapidly evolving lightcurves make fast Type Ibn SNe[^1] a member of the mysterious group of short-duration extragalactic transients [@Whitesides2017]. This part of the phase space of optical transients is both interesting and yet poorly constrained, due to the observational biases against detection [@Kasliwal2012]. For example, the discovery of the kilonova AT2017gfo [@Coulter2017; @Kasliwal2017; @Arcavi2017; @Nicholl2017], the optical counterpart to the double neutron-star merger event GW170817[@Abbott2017; @Abbott2017a], was a fast, faint, and rare event located in this area of phase space. Other rare classes of transients in this fast part of the phase space have also been recently discovered, such as Fast-Blue Optical Transients [FBOTs; e.g., @Drout2014], which the mysterious extreme object AT2018cow [@Perley2019] is a likely a member of. In fact, @Fox2019 suggest in their recent paper that AT2018cow might be related to Type Ibn SNe.
In this paper we highlight the possibility of using the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF), a state-of-the-art wide-field robotic transient survey, to find and follow-up rapidly evolving explosive transients by focusing on the example of SN 2018bcc, which is a fast-rising Type Ibn SN detected during early survey operations (Fig. \[fig:fc\]). Despite the rarity of Type Ibn SNe, ZTF was able to obtain the hitherto best example of a fast Type Ibn SN with a well-sampled rising lightcurve.
Type Ibn SNe
------------
The classification of Type Ibn SNe was first proposed by @Pastorello2007 to include H-poor stripped-envelope (SE) SNe with relatively narrow He (${\sim}2000~\text{km}~\text{s}^{-1}$) emission features, with the prototypical example being SN 2006jc [@Pastorello2007; @Foley2007; @Pastorello2008]. Type Ibn SNe are relatively blue and bright at peak compared to an ordinary SE SN [@Pastorello2016]. The brightness, blue color, and the relatively narrow He emission features are all thought to be evidence of CSM interaction with a He-rich CSM, which could potentially be the primary powering mechanism of this class [see e.g., @Pastorello2016; @Hosseinzadeh2017; @Karamehmetoglu2017].
To-date, no more than ${\sim}30$ Type Ibn SNe have been published in the literature [@Hosseinzadeh2019]. Most of them have been studied in sample papers by @Pastorello2016 [P16] and @Hosseinzadeh2017 [H17], which have uncovered several puzzling observational signatures.
H17 show that the class of Type Ibn SNe displays a surprisingly homogeneous photometric evolution for CSM interacting SNe. Nevertheless, in their earlier sample paper, P16 argue that the class shows a large heterogeneity in spectral and lightcurve characteristics, with both very fast and long-lasting examples [see e.g., @Pastorello2015; @Karamehmetoglu2017 for fast and slow, respectively]. Similarly, a whole gamut of spectral properties can be found in the Type Ibn class that range from those with spectra that look very much like Type Ib SN spectra to those that show a significant number of H emission lines (even though the He features dominate), making them intermediate cases between Type IIn and Type Ibn SNe. Although this heterogeneity was also acknowledged in H17, the Type Ibn SN lightcurves in their analysis still seem to be much more similar to each other than the lightcurves of Type IIn SNe. The relative photometric homogeneity can offer clues into the nature of the CSM around Type Ibn SNe. It also means that detailed study of a well-observed event can prove fruitful.
In another puzzling observational signature, H17 noted that the early line profiles of Type Ibn SN seem to cluster into two groups (primarily based on the strong $\lambda~5876$ emission line): one showing strong P-Cygni profiles and the other appearing primarily in emission. By 20 days past peak however, both groups had evolved to become more emission dominated. H17 suggested that this division could be a result of optical depth effects in the CSM. Since line profiles and fluxes depend on density, temperature, and optical depths [e.g., @Fransson2014], their suggestion can be investigated by modeling the optical depth effects on the line profiles of Type Ibn spectra.
In the rest of this paper, we present the most well-constrained fast-rising Type Ibn SN, SN 2018bcc, and compare it to a selected literature sample. It has a $<6$ d risetime as seen in Fig. \[fig:appmag\] and declines on a similar time-scale as other Type Ibn SNe. While several examples of Type Ibn SNe with fast risetimes ($<<10$ d) are known in the literature [see e.g., @Pastorello2015 H17], their rapid evolution and the rarity of Type Ibn SNe have resulted in few detections at or before peak. Consequently, observations defining the shape of the rising lightcurve have been lacking for these rapidly evolving events. Additionally, their rapid decline has also made it difficult to obtain late-time spectra.
The paper is laid out as follows: Section \[sec:18bcc\] presents basic information about SN 2018bcc and its host. Section \[sec:obss\] describes the ZTF survey and contains the details of the photometry and spectroscopy that were obtained. The analysis of this data is presented in Sect. \[sec:analysis\] followed by our semi-analytical modeling in Sect. \[sec:modeling\]. The results are presented in Sect. \[sec:results\] and discussed in the context of Type Ibn SNe in Sect. \[sec:discuss\]. Finally we list our conclusions in Sect. \[sec:concl\].
SN 2018bcc \[sec:18bcc\]
------------------------
![Color-combined image of SN 2018bcc ($g$- and $r$-band filters from TNG+DOLORES) at the epoch of our last detection. North is up and East is to the left. The field-of-view is 2x 2. The SN, well visible at the center of the image, is located in the outskirts of its host galaxy. A bright, saturated star is positioned north and somewhat east of the host galaxy.[]{data-label="fig:fc"}](FCSN2018bcc.png){width="\linewidth"}
SN 2018bcc, located at RA = 16:14:22.65 and Dec = +35:55:04.4 (J2000.0), was first detected by the ZTF on 2018 April 18.34 (JD 2458226.84052) at an $r$-band magnitude of 18.98. ZTF previously observed this field 1.89 days before, on April 16.45, and could not detect any source down to a magnitude of $r$ > 20.12 at the location of the transient. In the first three days after discovery, the SN was followed in $r$ band only, and thereafter it was also imaged in $g$ band.
In April 2018, the ZTF survey had begun public survey observations but the associated alert stream [@Patterson2019] had not yet started. The transient was subsequently discovered by ATLAS[^2] on 2018 April 19, and by Gaia[^3] 5 days later.
Milky Way (MW) extinction towards the SN is estimated to be E(B$-$V)$~= 0.0124$ mag [@Schlafly2011]. We did not detect evidence for significant host extinction (in the form of narrow Na ID absorption lines or a reddened spectrum) and assume it to be negligible for the analysis presented in this paper. Additionally, the SN is located in the outskirts of its host galaxy and is blue in color, which corroborates our assumption of insignificant host extinction. The redshift towards the SN is measured to be $\text{z} = 0.0636$ (Sect. \[sec:specID\]) from a fit to the He emission lines of the SN, and verified via host galaxy emission lines present in the latest 2D spectrum. Assuming a cosmology with H$_0=73$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_\text{M}=0.27$, $\Omega_\Lambda=0.73$ (selected to enable easier literature comparisons), we calculate a distance modulus $=37.19$ mag. This corresponds to a luminosity distance of 274 Mpc.
Observations \[sec:obss\]
=========================
The Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) \[sec:ZTF\]
-----------------------------------------------
Building on the success of previous transient surveys, the next-generation synoptic surveys such as the Zwicky Transient Facility [ZTF; @bellm2019; @graham2018], the successor to the (i)PTF, have come online. The ZTF[^4] is a state-of-the-art robotic survey conducted on Palomar Samuel Oschin 48-inch (1.2 m) Schmidt Telescope with a 47 deg$^2$ effective field-of-view. In the standard configuration, the survey takes 30 s exposures reaching down to $\sim$21$^{\text{st}}$ magnitude in the $r$ band with 10 s instrument overheads and a dedicated robotic scheduler that minimizes slewing overheads [@Bellm2019a]. Essentially, the ZTF can survey the entire northern sky above Palomar every night down to 21$^{\text{st}}$ magnitude [@bellm2019].
The ZTF survey has been optimized for transient science [@Bellm2016] by both covering the entire night sky with a ${\sim}3$ day cadence in $g$ and $r$ bands while also covering smaller parts of the sky with $2\text{--}4$ observations per night in the two filters. As a result, the ZTF survey provides an opportunity to populate some of the remaining gaps in the the brightness and duration phase-space of transients, especially with respect to discovering and obtaining well-sampled lightcurves for rare and fast objects such as Type Ibn SNe.
Photometry \[sec:phot\]
-----------------------
We collected photometry in $g$, $r$, and $i$ bands from the ZTF survey obtained with the P48 telescope[^5]. The ZTF pipeline is described in @Masci2019 and employs the image subtraction algorithm of @Zackay2016. We also obtained late-time images in $g$ and $r$ bands using the 3.58m Telescopio Nazionale Galileo (TNG)[^6].
The P48 photometry was reduced using FPipe [@Fremling2016], which produces point-spread function (PSF) photometry from sky and template subtracted images. The final photometric reduction was done using reference templates obtained by stacking images from more than 2 weeks before discovery (JD $<2458209$) to remove any possibility of SN light contributing to the template. FPipe photometry is converted to the SDSS photometric system using reference stars in the field selected from the Pan-STARRS 1 survey [@Magnier2016; @Flewelling2016].
The final epoch of images obtained with the TNG were reduced using standard IRAF[^7] photometric reduction steps without template subtraction (since the galaxy is better resolved with the TNG).
![Apparent magnitude lightcurve of SN 2018bcc, binned daily. The average magnitude of each bin was used with the errors added in quadrature. Limits are the deepest limit for the night. The observations are from the P48 survey telescope except for the final $g$ and $r$-band detections, which were obtained with the TNG. The spectral epochs are indicated with vertical black dashes at the top of the figure. **Inset:** A zoomed-in version of the unbinned rising lightcurve, highlighting the well-captured rise in the $r$ band.[]{data-label="fig:appmag"}](Figures/AppMag_v1.pdf){width="1.05\linewidth"}
SN 2018bcc was detected very early in the ZTF public survey. Some of the data were obtained during verification of subsystems. During normal operations the ZTF lightcurves would be more evenly sampled but here we actually obtained an unusually high sampling during the first night. The photometry for the alerts has since been improved upon, and alert distribution in the public survey began to be published in June 2018. We work only with re-reduced photometry from FPipe in this paper.
Spectroscopy \[sec:spec\]
-------------------------
A log of the spectral observations is presented in the Appendix, Table \[tab:spectra\] and the spectral sequence is show in Fig. \[fig:specseq\]. An initial spectrum was obtained $6.99$ d after discovery with the Palomar 60 inch (P60) telescope [@Cenko2006] equipped with the SED machine [SEDM; @Blagorodnova2018; @Rigault2019]. Since the SEDM spectrum showed a featureless blue spectrum, an additional classification spectrum was obtained using the SPectrograph for the Rapid Acquisition of Transients (SPRAT) mounted on the Liverpool Telescope [LT; @Steele2004]. Relatively low resolution but automated spectroscopic follow-up instruments such as the SEDM and SPRAT are the primary means by which ZTF classifies extragalactic transients [@2018ATel11688....1F].
Additional follow-up spectra were obtained with Keck I equipped with LRIS (Low Resolution Imaging Spectrometer; [@Oke1995; @Perley2019a]), the Nordic Optical Telescope (NOT) equipped with ALFOSC (The Alhambra Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera), and the Palomar 200 inch (P200) telescope equipped with DBSP [the Double Spectrograph; @Oke1982; @Bellm2016b]. The spectra are made publicly available via WiseRep [@Yaron2012].
![Spectral sequence for SN 2018bcc with restframe phase since peak (JD 2458231.5) of each spectrum indicated. The original spectrum is shown in gray while solid black lines represent the binned data.[]{data-label="fig:specseq"}](Figures/UpdatedFigs/specseq_SN2018bcc.pdf){width="\linewidth"}
The spectra were reduced by members of the ZTF collaboration in a standard manner with dedicated pipelines for each instrument. In general, the spectra are bias and flat-field corrected, wavelength calibrated using an arc spectrum, extracted and then flux calibrated using a sensitivity function obtained from observing spectrophotometric standard stars. We further absolute flux calibrate the spectra by comparing synthetic photometry computed from the spectra to our $r$-band photometry.
The synthetic photometry were computed using synphot [@2018ascl.soft11001S] and the PS1 filter profiles since our photometry were calibrated to PS1[^8]. The spectra were then de-reddened to correct for MW extinction using E(B$-$V)$~= 0.0124$ mag and R$_\textrm{V} = 3.1$, as for the photometry.
Photometric Analysis \[sec:analysis\]
=====================================
Restframe absolute magnitude lightcurves for SN 2018bcc are constructed using the previously mentioned distance modulus. Correction for extinction due to the MW is applied while host extinction is assumed to be negligible (Sect. \[sec:18bcc\]). We compare this lightcurve in $g$ and $r$ bands to a literature sample of Type Ibn SN lightcurves in Fig. \[fig:absmag\]. In the comparison sample we include all of the fast rising Type Ibn SNe with a meaningful constraint on the rise: LSQ12btw and LSQ13ccw [@Pastorello2015]; PTF12ldy, iPTF14aki, and iPTF15ul [@Hosseinzadeh2017]. We also include the well-observed but much slower SN 2010al [@Pastorello2015a], the prototypical example of the Type Ibn class - SN 2006jc [@Pastorello2007; @Foley2007], and the very nearby Type Ibn SN 2015U [@Shivvers2017] for comparison. The template Type Ibn R-band lightcurve from @Hosseinzadeh2017 is also shown. The literature sample has been corrected for MW extinction and we adopt explosion epochs, distance moduli, and redshifts as estimated by the respective works. In the cases of iPTF15ul and SN 2015U, where significant evidence of host extinction was noted and estimated, we also correct for the host extinction as reported in these papers. We note that without correcting for significant host extinction, iPTF15ul would be similar in brightness to other Type Ibn SNe, including SN 2018bcc.
{width="0.8\linewidth"}
Risetime \[sec:risetimes\]
--------------------------
The risetime is the interval between the estimated explosion and peak epochs. Although SN 2018bcc has a fast risetime similar to a few other Type Ibn SNe, the nature of the ZTF observations allowed us to capture an unusually well-sampled rising lightcurve, with seven photometric points on the first day and well-sampled $g,r$ band data on the rise, peak, and decline- the combination of which has not been observed for such a fast-rising Type Ibn SN before (see Fig. \[fig:absmag\] for a comparison to other Type Ibn SNe). The well-defined peak epoch and close pre-discovery limits of SN 2018bcc allow us to establish a well determined risetime; a unique opportunity for a fast Type Ibn SN (Table \[tab:risetimes\]). We perform this exercise using the $r-$band lightcurve.
![Estimating the restframe risetime from fits with $\propto$ t$^2$, a more general t$^{\alpha}$ powerlaw, and using Gaussian process regression, to the rising lightcurve extrapolated to zero flux.[]{data-label="fig:risetimes"}](Figures/Rise_v3.pdf){width="\linewidth"}
[llll]{}\
SN & Rise & Uncertainty & Powerlaw $\alpha$\
& (restframe d) & (d) &\
\
**SN 2018bcc** & 5.6 & $^{+0.2}_{-0.1}$ & $1.95 \pm 0.22$\
iPTF15ul & 4.0 \[3.0\] & $\pm 0.6~[0.7]$ & $1.8 \pm 0.4$\
LSQ13ccw & \[4.7\] & $\pm [2.1]$ & -\
LSQ12btw & $[<3.8]^\text{a}$ & - & -\
PTF12ldy & \[6.2\] & $\pm [2.0] $ & -\
\
[$^\text{\tiny a}$]{}Peak cannot be determined.
In order to quantify the shape of the rising lightcurve, a low-order polynomial fit was used to obtain the epoch of the peak of the $r-$band lightcurve: JD 2458231.5, which we use as reference phase in the rest of the paper. (The $g-$band peaks slightly before on JD 2458230.9.) The binned lightcurve was put into flux space using the AB-magnitude zero point, with the upper limits shown at zero flux and error bars corresponding to the measured limits. Then, we estimated the explosion epoch and the corresponding risetime (in restframe) in four different ways.
Most conservatively, the risetime is estimated to be the average of the last upper limit and first detection (JD 2458226.8), yielding $5.1 \pm 1.0$ days, with the uncertainty given by the period between last non-detection and first detection. Second, we fit the rise in flux space with a $t^2$ scaling polynomial and extrapolate down to zero flux. Assuming that the explosion epoch approximately corresponds to the epoch where the fit crosses zero flux, this method yields a risetime of $5.5 \pm 0.1$ days. The same assumption is also made in the remaining two methods. Third, we fit a powerlaw of the form [\[(t$-$t$_\text{max}$)/t$_\text{rise}\text{]}^{\alpha}$]{}, allowing $\alpha$ to vary, and fitting the upper limits at the same time. We obtain $\alpha = 1.95 \pm 0.22$ and a corresponding risetime of $5.5 \pm 0.1$ days. Finally, we perform a non-parametric fit using Gaussian process (GP) regression, which has the benefit of learning the noise from the data. Extrapolating the GP fit to zero flux yields a risetime of $5.6^{+0.2}_{-0.1}$ days. The polynomial, powerlaw, and GP fits are plotted in Fig. \[fig:risetimes\]. All four estimates of the risetime agree within the errors. For the rest of the paper, we use a risetime of $5.6^{+0.2}_{-0.1}$ days as calculated using the more conservative GP regression, which corresponds to an explosion epoch of JD 2458225.5.
The precise risetime and the shape of the rising lightcurve of SN 218bcc makes it the most well-observed example among fast Type Ibn SNe. Other fast-rising Type Ibn SNe had an uncertain peak epoch due to the difficulty of catching and sampling the peak for such rapidly evolving events. The risetimes and rising shapes of fast Type Ibn SNe are compared in Table \[tab:risetimes\]. PTF15ul, the previously best observed example, was the only other fast Type Ibn SN for which we were able to obtain a meaningful constraint on the exponent of the powerlaw fit to the rise, $\alpha = 1.8 \pm 0.4$, and a risetime of $4.0 \pm 0.6$ d using the powerlaw method. This was done in the same way as for SN 2018bcc above. The exponents obtained for the powerlaw fits to the two SNe agree within the uncertainties and are close to a value of 2.0 predicted by the simple fireball model, sometimes used for Type Ia SNe [e.g., @Riess1999]. It seems that the large sky coverage and high cadence of ZTF will enable us to obtain a sample of these rare and rapidly evolving events with well-observed peaks and risetimes, which has been lacking in previous investigations of fast-evolving Type Ibn SNe.
{width="\linewidth"}
Colors \[sec:color\]
--------------------
The restframe $g-r$ color evolution of SN 2018bcc is plotted in the right-hand panel of Fig. \[fig:colors\]. The colors were obtained by interpolating the $r-$ and $g-$band absolute magnitude lightcurves using both a @Contardo2000 empirical fit and smoothing splines. By using Gaussian process regression, the empirical fits were assumed to have normally distributed (white) noise around the fit. In addition, the fits were allowed to smoothly vary to better fit the data using a radial-basis kernel. This process allowed us to build a model that interpolates the full lightcurves and estimates the uncertainty more robustly, including phases of the lightcurve far away from photometric epochs (which naturally have larger uncertainties). The interpolation models are shown in the left-hand panel of Fig. \[fig:colors\] and these are used to calculate the $g-r$ color in the right-hand panel of the same figure.
The color is relatively blue with an evolution to the red that lasts until ${\sim}2$ weeks past discovery, after which the color seems to become bluer again, and finally it remains relatively flat within the estimated uncertainties. This is typical of Type Ibn SNe, which are usually quite blue at early times [@Pastorello2016].
The results of the interpolation models differ when extrapolating the very early $g$-band lightcurve due to the assumptions of each model and the lack of data. However we find that this does not make a significant difference in our analysis. In addition to color, these interpolation models were used to absolute flux calibrate the spectra to the photometry at the spectral epochs and for interpolation of the $g-r$ color when constructing the pseudo-bolometric lightcurve (Sect. \[sec:bolo\]). Additionally, we calculate the peak absolute magnitude of SN 2018bcc from the interpolation models as $-19.37 \pm 0.03$ mag in the $r$ band and as $-19.68 \pm 0.03$ mag in the $g$ band.
Decline rates
-------------
We measure the decline rate parametrized by the magnitude drop in 15 days after peak ($\Delta\text{M}_{15}$), as well as the late-time decline slope ($s$) of SN 2018bcc. For $\Delta\text{M}_{15}$, the interpolation models from the previous section are used, yielding $\Delta\text{M}_{15}$(r)$ =2.25\pm0.01$ mag and $\Delta\text{M}_{15}$(g)$=2.24\pm0.02$ mag. When estimating $s$, we fit a line to the binned lightcurves and only consider the points later than 15 and 20 days past peak, thus calculating two separate slope values, $s_{15}$ and $s_{20}$, respectively. We obtain $s_{15}\text{(r)}=0.066 \pm 0.003$ mag d$^{-1}$ and $s_{15}\text{(g)}=0.072 \pm 0.003$ mag d$^{-1}$ when cutting before 15 days and $s_{20}\text{(r)}=0.063 \pm 0.001$ mag d$^{-1}$ and $s_{20}\text{(g)}=0.066 \pm 0.002$ mag d$^{-1}$ when cutting at 20 days past peak. Similar to other fast Type Ibn SNe, SN 2018bcc thus seems to decline rather rapidly with a late-time rate of ${\sim}0.06\text{–}0.07$ mag d$^{-1}$ and has a $\Delta\text{M}_{15}$ that is almost twice as large as the typical value for Type Ia SNe.
Spectroscopic analysis \[sec:specID\]
=====================================
We determine the redshift from the relatively narrow lines in the supernova spectrum. Using the last Keck spectrum we measured the five strongest emission lines and identify these with strong emission. The deduced redshift is then z = $0.06358\pm0.0007$, where the error is the standard deviation from the mean redshift from the five lines. We also checked this with the location of nearby H$\alpha$ in the 2D spectrum of the last Keck spectrum. There is H$\alpha$ from the host nucleus and a nearby region, as well as slightly blue shifted emission from the SN (that is resolved and not coming from the host, see Sect. \[sec:otherlines\]. From this investigation we obtain a slightly higher uncertainty of $\pm 0.00098$. The larger redshift error corresponds to a typical systematic uncertainty in our velocity measurements of ${\sim}300{\rm ~km~s^{-1}}$.
![**Left:** The evolution of the blackbody (BB) temperature obtained from BB fits to the spectra. **Right:** The evolution of the BB radius.[]{data-label="fig:BBtemps"}](Figures/BBTempR.pdf){width="\linewidth"}
{width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"}
Early spectra ($t\lesssim10\,\rm{d}$ past peak) show a blue featureless continuum, although the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is not sufficient to rule out the presence of shallow features. At these early phases the spectra are well fitted by a blackbody (BB) with a temperature of $1\text{--}1.5 \times 10^4$ K (see Fig. \[fig:BBtemps\] for a plot of the BB temperature evolution). From $+14 \text{d}$, we clearly identify the prominent and relatively narrow emission lines (FWHM $\sim2000$ km s$^{-1}$), marking SN 2018bcc as a Type Ibn SN. These later spectra are not well matched to a BB due to the presence of strong emission lines, and so the effective temperatures obtained from such fits are dubious. We perform line identification on the two emission dominated Keck spectra at $+20$ and $+52$ days using common Type Ibn SN lines. The results are plotted in \[fig:linesID2\]. In addition to the \] lines that dominate the spectra, we also clearly see lines of , , , and late-time H$\alpha$, in addition to possible features (Sect. \[sec:otherlines\]).
Evolution of the lines {#sec:Helines}
----------------------
lines are visible from $+11\,\rm{d}$, although they become more evident at later phases. At $+14\,\rm{d}$ we identify common strong lines of $\lambda\lambda$ 3889, 4471, 5876, 6678, and 7065 in emission, all showing P-Cygni profiles with prominent emission components and a varying strength in absorption. Additionally, we used the strong lines of He tabulated by NIST[^9] and overlaid those with a relative intensity $\geq10$ (where $\lambda~5016$ is 100) on the spectrum taken at $+20\,\rm{d}$, which is plotted with dark blue dashed-lines in Fig. \[fig:linesID2\]. As we will discuss in Sect. \[sec:Helines\], lab measurements are not appropriate for the conditions in SN 2018bcc and we only use the line list to guide spectral identification. Nevertheless, every single line from NIST in the wavelength range of our spectrum matches a prominent emission feature with a P-Cygni profile in the spectrum except for in the very edges of the spectrum ( $\lambda\lambda$ 3013 and 9464), where the spectrum is too noisy ($\text{SNR}< 1$). We consider this strong evidence for the detection of 15 lines in the late spectra of SN 2018bcc: $\lambda\lambda$ 3188, 3820, 3889, 4026, 4121, 4388, 4471, 4713, 4922, 5016, 5048, 5876, 6678, 7065, 7281.
{width="18cm"} {width="18cm"}
All lines show symmetric profiles with broad wings typical of interacting transients and generally attributed to Thomson scattering by free electrons in an unperturbed dense CSM. The evolution of these lines from +14 to +52 d is shown in Fig. \[fig:HeIlines\]. Fitting a combination of Lorentzian and Gaussian components (for the emission and absorption components, respectively) to the seven strongest observed profiles (Figs. \[fig:linesID2\] & \[fig:HeIlines\]) we infer FWHM that are nearly constant with time of $2370\pm530\,\rm{km}\,\rm{s^{-1}}$ for the emission components, while absorption features show blue wings extending up to $1600\pm200\,\rm{km}\,\rm{s^{-1}}$ and absorption minima of $960\pm100\,\rm{km}\,\rm{s^{-1}}$ (possibly representing expansion velocities).
At $+20$ d, $~\lambda$ 7065 still shows a $\rm{FWHM}\simeq2000\,\rm{km}\,\rm{s^{-1}}$, although the profile is well reproduced using a single Lorentzian component, without clear evidence of any absorption component, even though absorption components are clearly visible in other lines in the same spectrum. At $+52\,\rm{d}$, the lines evolve significantly; whereas $~\lambda\lambda$ 3889 and 4471 lines still show P-Cygni profiles with pronounced absorptions and weak emission components, at redder wavelengths the lines are characterized by structured boxy profiles in emission with no trace of absorption.
In aggregate, the redder lines show weaker P-Cygni at earlier phases, but then evolve faster to show even less P-Cygni and more boxy profiles. Meanwhile, the P-Cygni profiles are stronger for bluer lines in the first spectrum, and while getting generally weaker in the latter spectra, still remain stronger than in the red lines and are still clearly visible at +52 d for the seven bluest lines (Fig. \[fig:linesID2\]).
Identification and evolution of other lines \[sec:otherlines\]
--------------------------------------------------------------
From +14 d, the spectra show an excess at wavelengths bluer than $\sim5500$ Å. These are most likely due to the presence of several multiplets (e.g. multiplets 40, 42, 46). To identify possible lines we use the calculation by [@Sigut2003] to obtain expected approximate line strengths. Although the line strengths are specifically for fluorescence by Ly$\alpha$, this influences mainly the lines in the NIR, and their calculation should give an idea of the transitions that are most important. The expected line strengths are plotted with red lines in Fig. \[fig:linesID2\].
Although we do not unambiguously detect strong and resolved lines, the $\lambda\lambda$ 4924, 5018 lines could be contributing to the $\lambda\lambda$ 4922, 5016, 5048 lines (the latter two are blended). As shown in Table \[tab:linesFit\], the FWHM velocities of these specific lines show a large increase between +14 and +52 d not seen in other lines.
At $+14\,\rm{d}$, two broad features are visible at wavelengths consistent with $\lambda\lambda~7292,\,7324$ (blended with $\lambda$ 7281) as well as with $\lambda\lambda$ 7877,7896, although here we cannot rule out contamination from $\lambda$ 7774 to the observed feature. From $+20\,\rm{d}$ we also identify the H and K lines and the NIR triplet in emission. The spectrum at $+52\,\rm{d}$ shows significant changes in the line shapes. The $\lambda\lambda$ 7877,7896 disappears into the noise, while the NIR triplet and the blend of $\lambda\lambda~7292,\,7324$ and $\lambda$ 7281 become stronger. The evolution of and lines are shown in Fig. \[fig:mgca\] of the Appendix.
In the final spectrum at $+52$ d, resolved H$\alpha$ is clearly seen that is significantly narrower (and weaker) than the features. The FWHM is $\lesssim 1000$ km s$^{-1}$ and the centroid is bluehifted by $300$ km s$^{-1}$. The evolution of the region around H$\alpha$ is also plotted in Fig. \[fig:mgca\]. The +52 d H$\alpha$ line is clearly resolved as it contains $3-4$ resolution elements. It was also closely inspected in the 2D Keck spectrum and is clearly separated from both a nearby HII region and the galaxy center, which were lying along the slit. However, because of the low number of resolution elements, it is difficult to delineate the continuum from the line exactly and hence to measure the FWHM velocity accurately. We estimate a FWHM velocity of ${\sim}8\text{--}900$ km s$^{-1}$.
The non-helium lines are especially interesting as indicators of advanced nucleosynthesis. The most interesting diagnostic lines in this respect are the \[\] $\lambda\lambda~6300, 6364$ and \] $\lambda~4571$. However, even at day +52 when such indicators should become stronger, \] is weak and \[\] is below the noise, if at all present (Fig. \[fig:linesID2\]).
Host environment properties \[sec:host\]
----------------------------------------
One intriguing aspect of SN 2018bcc is the position within the host galaxy, since the supernova is situated relatively far from the center. The host of SN 2018bcc is SDSS J161422.13+355501.3 and does not have a known redshift. Therefore, we use the redshift measured from the SN spectrum (Sect. \[sec:specID\]). This galaxy has the following measured SDSS magnitudes: $u=19.70\pm 0.07,
g=18.66\pm 0.01,
r=18.32\pm 0.01,
i=18.07\pm 0.01,
z=17.94\pm 0.04$. Based on the magnitudes of the host galaxy of SN 2018bcc and the position of this SN with respect to the nucleus, it is possible to estimate the metallicity at the SN position. After correcting for extinction and distance modulus, we use the relation provided by @Sanders2013a that connects the absolute $g$-band magnitude and the $g-r$ color of the galaxy to its central O3N2 oxygen abundance. We obtained log(O/H)+12=8.39 dex. However, the SN is located in the outskirts of the host, at a projected distance of $7\arcsec$ along the major axis, which corresponds to 1.04 times the radius of the galaxy, R[^10]. Assuming a negative metallicity gradient in the galaxy of $-0.47~\text{dex R}^{-1}$ as in @Taddia2015, we derive a metallicity \[log(O/H)+12\] at the position of the SN of ${\sim}7.9$ dex, which is significantly sub-solar (Z = 0.16 Z$_\sun$). This estimate would be even lower if there were projection effects.
SDSS J161422.13+355501.3 is also a source in GALEX General Release 6 [@Bianchi2013], with UV fluxes in the far- and near-UV bands (FUV and NUV, respectively). We obtained the fluxes in a $7.\!\!^{\prime\prime}5$ aperture using NED[^11] and corrected them for interstellar dust extinction following @Salim2007 for the FUV band. We used the extinction corrected FUV band flux to estimate the star formation rate using the calibration from @Salim2007, and obtain SFR$\sim0.2~\text{M}_\sun~\text{yr}^{-1}$ (for a Salpeter IMF).
Modeling \[sec:overallmodeling\]
================================
Bolometric lightcurve \[sec:bolo\]
----------------------------------
In order to model the possible powering mechanism of SN 2018bcc with semi-analytical lightcurve models, we construct a bolometric lightcurve from our observations. Due to the fact that we lack multi-band coverage across the EM-spectrum (especially in the UV and NIR), we employ a hybrid approach to construct the bolometric lightcurve.
First we use our spectra to create a quasi-bolometric lightcurve via direct integration of the common integration region from 4000 Å to 8500 Å (excluding the LT spectrum at +3 d that does not cover this region). We then extend this region to the UV and NIR by using our BB fits, going to the left edge of the U-band in the UV at 3300 Å. Following @Lyman2013 we cut off the SED for wavelengths shorter than 2000 Å, since there should be strong line blanketing there. We linearly interpolate from zero flux at 2000 Å to the value of our BB fit at 3300 Å (i.e., the left edge of the typical U-band). We convert the integrated flux from this exercise into bolometric magnitudes and calculate a bolometric correction to the $r$-band absolute magnitude lightcurve at the epochs of the spectra using the interpolated $r$-band lightcurve model from Sect. \[sec:color\]. The bolometric lightcurve was then created from these bolometric corrections. Details of our methods are explained in Appendix \[app:bololc\].
The derived bolometric correction is good enough for our purposes; we want to use this bolometric lightcurve mainly to assess the underlying powering mechanisms. The pseudo-bolometric lightcurve we obtain by applying our derived bolometric correction to the $r$-band lightcurve is plotted in Fig. \[fig:bolo\]. Except for the systematic uncertainties on the distance and MW extinction, all other sources of error are propagated for this figure, with the uncertainty from absolute flux-calibration being dominant. In the proceeding analysis, we add the uncertainty from distance (a large systematic error due to cosmology). We also add the scatter in *all* possible bolometric corrections obtained via varying our assumptions (see Appendix \[app:bololc\]). Thus, the resulting uncertainty is very conservative. While neither error dominates, the scatter in the bolometric correction is a larger source of error. With these additions, the bolometric luminosity at peak ($L_p$) is $2.0 \pm 0.8(0.1) \times 10^{43}$ erg s$^{-1}$ and the total radiated energy is $2.1 \pm 0.8(0.1) \times 10^{49}$ erg. The error bars in the parenthesis are from the single method described above (and plotted in Fig. \[fig:bolo\]), without the larger error from distance and the scatter in all possible values of the bolometric corrections.
![Arnett (dashed-lines) and CSM model (straight lines) fits to the bolometric lightcurve of SN 2018bcc (blue). For the Arnett models, the bright peak of SN 2018bcc requires a larger mass of than the total ejecta mass allowed by the rapidly evolving lightcurve, which is unphysical. Therefore, Arnett models cannot fit both the bright peak and the rapidly declining tail simultaneously, even when accounting for gamma-ray leakage. Instead, we show two examples of CSM interaction powered model fits that can reproduce the bright and rapidly evolving peak of SN 2018bcc, using different parameters describing the CSM. Due to the caveats of these models (see text), we only use them to illustrate that bright and rapidly evolving lightcurves, such as that of SN 2018bcc, can be naturally produced by CSM interaction. The r-band upper limit has been included using the same bolometric correction as in Sect. \[sec:bolo\].[]{data-label="fig:arnett"}](Figures/Arnett.pdf){width="1.05\linewidth"}
The powering mechanism of SN 2018bcc \[sec:modeling\]
-----------------------------------------------------
While the luminosity of ordinary SE SNe are thought to be powered by the radioactive decay of , strongly CSM interacting SNe could be dominated by the luminosity input from shocks created by the collisions between the ejecta and the nearby dense CSM. Certainly for Type Ibn SNe, it is possible that CSM interaction dominates the luminosity input, since we see evidence for CSM interaction in the spectra. In this section we model the bolometric lightcurve of SN 2018bcc using two semi-analytical lightcurve models.
In the first, sometimes referred to as a “simple” @Arnett1982 model, we assume the SN is powered by only the radioactive decay of . A working algorithm for this model was presented by @Cano2013. We follow the assumptions of @Karamehmetoglu2017 and use an ejecta expansion velocity of V$=7000$ km s$^{-1}$, a constant effective opacity of $\kappa = 0.07 ~\text{cm}^2~\text{g}^{-1}$, and an $\text{E}/\text{M}_\text{ej} = (3/10)\text{V}^2$ where E is the kinetic energy and M$_\text{ej}$ is the ejecta mass. In the standard Arnett model, the energy produced by radioactive decay is primarily radiated in the form of gamma-rays that are fully trapped by the ejecta. However, as the opacity drops with expansion, some gamma-rays should escape without thermalizing, thus lowering the observed luminosity. In our modeling, we also take into account the luminosity decrease due to this gamma-ray leakage following the scaling relations of @Clocchiatti1997 and additionally apply the modification for energy loss via positrons [@Sollerman1998], using the same implementation as in @Karamehmetoglu2017.
The result of our fitting is plotted with dashed lines in Fig. \[fig:arnett\]. Using these assumptions, it is not possible to explain the rapidly evolving lightcurve of SN 2018bcc using radioactive powering alone. Since there cannot be more nickel than the total ejecta mass, attempting to fit the peak requires a high mass of and hence too high of an ejecta mass to fit the lightcurve tail. Conversely, lowering the ejecta mass to fit the tail means that even if all of the ejecta were made of , there is not enough to power the peak of the lightcurve. (A more realistic ratio of to ejecta mass would allow ${\sim} 2{~M_\odot}$ of ejecta that can still fit the tail for the same mass.) Thus, it is not possible to get a good fit to the lightcurve of SN 2018bcc with radioactive decay alone.
In order to unconstrain the ejecta mass as much as possible, we allowed the explosion epoch for the Arnett fits in Fig. \[fig:arnett\] to vary as long as they were below the pre-explosion limit from the $r$ band, since uncertainty in the explosion epoch is the strongest source of error for ejecta mass. The assumed characteristic ejecta velocity of V$=7000$ km s$^{-1}$, which was obtained for the transitional Type Ibn SN 2010al by @Pastorello2015a, is another source of uncertainty. Higher velocities would lead to higher ejecta masses. However, higher velocities also lead to greatly increased gamma-ray leakage [e.g., @Sollerman1998; @Karamehmetoglu2017]. These two effects can combine to produce a reasonable fit to SN 2018bcc with $\text{M}_\text{ej} \gtrsim 2\times$ mass, but such a model requires ejecta velocities in excess of $0.1c$. Since we lack any evidence to support such high-energy ejecta with relativistic velocities, this scenario seems unlikely.
Since it is not possible to fit the lightcurve with a purely radioactive decay powering scenario using observationally-based reasonable parameters, we turn to CSM interaction as an additional powering scenario that might be able to explain the bright but rapidly evolving lightcurve. In this exercise, we adopt the models of @Chatz2012 to construct a toy model of CSM interaction to test whether CSM interaction can indeed power the bright and rapidly evolving lightcurve of SN 2018bcc. In this simplified model the luminosity from a forward and reverse shock due to ejecta-CSM interaction is assumed to come from a steady photosphere at some suitable distance. We use the same physically-based assumptions as in @Karamehmetoglu2017 to construct a CSM interaction model to fit Type Ibn SNe.
The complicated nature of CSM interaction means that either changing the parameters in the same model, or modifying the model to take more parameters into account, are possible ways to achieve a model fit. To illustrate this fact we plot two example CSM model fits using different parameter values in Fig. \[fig:arnett\] that both produce a bright and rapidly evolving peak. By showing two different example fits, we highlight that the parameters used are not unique.
The CSM models 1 and 2 have reasonable ejecta and CSM masses of 1.3 and 0.05 ${~M_\odot}$ and 1.8 and 0.8 ${~M_\odot}$, respectively, with additional differences in parameters controlling the CSM properties (their details can be found in the Appendix). We emphasize that modifying the parameters that control the nature of CSM interaction could extend the model to also fit the tail. In this exercise we simply wanted to show that, unlike in the radioactive decay powered scenario, a bright and rapidly evolving peak can be powered by CSM interaction using reasonable values. Presumably, if CSM interaction powers the main peak of the lightcurve, an ordinary SE SN lightcurve with a low mass could be hidden underneath. Subtracting the CSM powered lightcurve can then provide an estimate of the mass of the underlying “hidden” lightcurve. However, since our spectra show continued evidence of CSM interaction, and no evidence of SN ejecta in the form of broad SN lines or a nebular spectrum with enhanced abundances, we caution that any such combined model would have to predict continued CSM interaction and lack spectral features of ejecta from a SN explosion. Nevertheless, using our CSM models from Fig. \[fig:arnett\], we estimate that ${\sim} 0.03 {~M_\odot}$ of could be powering a possible “hidden” SE-SN lightcurve. A higher mass is possible based on the Arnett model fit to the tail, if the CSM interaction is less luminous than our models.
The shock-interaction models of @Chatz2012 were developed for studying SLSNe with potentially high-mass and extended CSM. The assumptions of their simplified models may not be particularly appropriate for rapidly evolving lower-mass objects, such as Type Ibn SNe. Therefore, in order to move beyond our simple modeling, we make use of our spectra to model the properties of the CSM around SN 2018bcc in the next sections.
Modeling the line profiles \[sec:HeIFlux\]
------------------------------------------
The spectra of SN 2018bcc also offer insights into the nature of the CSM interaction. An important indicator of strong CSM interaction is the presence of a broad electron scattering wing in the emission lines. As can be seen in Fig. \[fig:HeIlines\], these scattering wings are clearly detected in the strong $\lambda~5876$ and $\lambda~7065$ emission lines up to day 20, where the wings extend to $\sim 5000 {\rm ~km~s^{-1}}$. Overall the lines are symmetric; a characteristic of electron scattering. As a result, the maximum extension of the lines are likely coming from electron scattering instead of representing the expansion velocity of the emitting region. However, the slightly bluehifted peaks also seen in Fig. \[fig:linesID2\] indicate that, in addition to electron scattering, there is macroscopic bulk motion of the emitting region. Although, redshift uncertainty can possibly account for some of the observed blueshift (${\sim}300{\rm ~km~s^{-1}}$; Sect. \[sec:spec\]), which we consider in the following investigation.
To illustrate this more quantitatively we have modeled the line profile of the day +20 $\lambda~5876$ line, using an extended version of the Monte Carlo code in [@Fransson2014]. The result of our modeling is shown in Fig. \[fig:MCsimul\], where we have over-plotted our model on top of the continuum subtracted $\lambda~5876$ line. We obtain an expansion speed of the emitting region of $600~\pm 300~{\rm ~km~s^{-1}}$ and an electron scattering optical depth of $\tau_{\rm e}=7$ for an assumed electron temperature of $T_{\rm e} = 15,000$ K. Depending on the assumed temperature, the optical depth scales as $\tau_{\rm e} \propto T_{\rm e}^{-1/2}$. A temperature of 7000 K would therefore correspond to $\tau_{\rm e} \approx 10$.
![Comparison of the observed continuum subtracted $\lambda~5876$ line at day 20 (black) and the calculated line profile due to electron scattering (magenta).[]{data-label="fig:MCsimul"}](Figures/SN2018bcc_day20.pdf){width="\linewidth"}
Given the small number of parameters in the model, the fit is very good. Both the overall shape of the line wings and the bluehift of the peak are well-reproduced. The main discrepancy is the P-Cygni absorption between ${\sim}800\text{--}1800 {\rm ~km~s^{-1}}$.
The fact that the electron scattering optical depth is large means that any absorption component will be filled in by the scattering as long as the optical depth is $\tau_{\rm e} \gtrsim 1$. The P-Cygni lines we observe must therefore form at lower $\tau_{\rm e}$, i.e., in the outer part of the shell, while most of the emission, seen in the $\lambda\lambda~5876, 6678, 7065, 7291$ lines, should originate at larger $\tau_{\rm e}$.
The best estimate of the expansion velocity of the line forming region comes from the blue edge of the P-Cygni lines, in particular the lines with a weak emission component, like the $\lambda~3889$ and $\lambda~4471$ lines. On the day 20 spectrum, these lines extend to $1900 \pm 400 {\rm ~km~s^{-1}}$, which we take as the expansion velocity of the CSM. The error is derived by adding in quad the measurement uncertainty with the systematic uncertainty from redshift.
The fact that the velocity from the P-Cygni absorption ($1900 \pm 400 {\rm ~km~s^{-1}}$) is larger than that inferred from the line shift of the electron scattering, $\sim 600 \pm 300 {\rm ~km~s^{-1}}$ means that the emitting region of the photons has a lower velocity than where the P-Cygni absorption arises. Such a case is seen in Eta Carinae, where several velocity components from different parts of the ejecta are present. While most of the ejected material has a velocity of $\sim 650 {\rm ~km~s^{-1}}$, a small fraction has velocities up to $3500-6000 {\rm ~km~s^{-1}}$ [@Smith2008]. These can be the result of several separate eruptions with different velocities, as observed e.g., for the pulsational pair instability models in [@Woosley2017]. However, a range of velocities can also be a result of a single ejection, where a nearly homologous velocity field is achieved after one or two expansion timescales. This type of velocity field is again observed for the ejecta in Eta Carinae [@Smith2006].
Moreover, multi-component velocity fields have been previously observed in Type Ibn SNe and were discussed by @Pastorello2016. As they note, the velocity of the emitting material might not represent the velocity of the deepest ejecta layer. Instead, it could also be coming from the interface between the forward and reverse shocks, effectively hiding the ejecta velocity.
CSM optical depth and density from emissivity \[sec:emiss\]
-----------------------------------------------------------
The relative fluxes of the lines are of interest for understanding the physical conditions in the CSM. The strongest lines in the optical region are the $\lambda~5876$ and $\lambda~7065$ lines. Under normal ISM conditions the $\lambda\lambda~7065/5876$ ratio is $\sim 0.18$ [e.g., @Benjamin2002]. However, in SN 2018bcc this ratio is $\sim 0.60$ at +20 days and $\sim 1.01$ at +52 days. The line ratios depend on density, temperature, and optical depth. In particular, a high optical depth of the $\lambda~3889$ line will increase the $\lambda~7065$ line relative to the $\lambda~5876$ line [e.g., @2006agna.book.....O]. Although, other lines are also sensitive to optical depth effects.
To study these effects we have calculated line strengths for different optical depths, electron densities, and temperatures, using atomic data from [@Benjamin2002]. The temperature and electron densities are assumed to be constant in the emitting region and are mainly important for the role of collisional excitation and de-excitation. As is common, we have used the optical depth of the $\lambda~3889$ as a parameter. The model assumes a Sobolev escape probability with homologous expansion velocity. As was discussed in last section, this is a natural choice if the CSM is a result of discrete eruptions. However, as long as the lines are optically thick, which is the case considered here, the escape probability is only weakly sensitive to the velocity field. E.g. if we consider a constant velocity, rather than a homologous expansion, the escape probability is $\beta=2/(3 \tau)$ compared to $\beta=1/\tau$ in the optically thick limit. The factor $2/3$ comes from the angle averaging.
Table \[tab:linesFlux\] gives the observed line fluxes of the most important lines relative to the $\lambda~5876$ line at +20 and +52 days. Our main constraints are the $\lambda\lambda~7065/5876$, $\lambda\lambda~6678/5876$ and $\lambda\lambda~7291/5876$ ratios. These are all well determined to $\lesssim 20 \%$. There are also uncertain (but still very useful) estimates from the $\lambda~3889$ and $\lambda~4471$ lines. Although both lines have strong P-Cygni absorption, their total net emission still provides important constraints in conjunction with the other ratios. When calculating $\chi^2$ in Figs. \[fig:He\_ratios\] and \[fig:He\_chi2\], $\lambda\lambda~6678, 7065, 7291$ line ratios provided the main constraints while $\lambda\lambda~3889, 4471$ line ratios were used as lower limits since the latter lines are strong in absorption but weak in emission.
------ --------- ---------
Line
Å Day +20 Day +52
3889 0.082 0.014
4471 0.056 0.068
4922 0.15 0.34
5018 0.21 0.22
5876 1.0 1.0
6678 0.28 0.26
7065 0.84 1.19
7291 0.21 0.21
------ --------- ---------
: Line flux ratios measured from the spectra used in Sect. \[sec:emiss\].[]{data-label="tab:linesFlux"}
Our results are presented in Fig. \[fig:He\_ratios\]. In the upper panels of Fig. \[fig:He\_ratios\], the line ratios relative to the $\lambda~5876$ line as function of optical depth, $\tau(3889)$, are shown for two electron densities, $n_{\rm e}=10^6 \text{cm}^{-3}$ and $n_{\rm e}=10^7 \text{cm}^{-3}$, respectively. In the lower two panels, the line ratios are instead shown as a function of electron density for two different optical depths, $\tau(3889) = 3.1\times 10^3$ and $\tau(3889) = 3.1\times 10^4$, and a temperature of $T_{\rm e}=7 \times 10^3$. The modeled line ratios (colored lines) are compared to the observed ratios at +20 and +52 days, which are shown as horizontal dashed and dotted lines, respectively, with each color corresponding to a specific line ratio. In the rest of the paper, the line ratios will omit the denominator ($\lambda~5876$) for conciseness, i.e., $\lambda~7065/5076$ ratio will be $\lambda~7065$ ratio.
{width="9cm"} {width="9cm"} {width="9cm"} {width="9cm"}
As we see in the upper panels, the emissivity of the $\lambda~7065$ ratio increases from a low value at small optical depths to a value close to one for $\tau(3889) \gtrsim 10^3$, where it reaches a maximum, before decreasing again. The $\lambda~3889$ and $\lambda~4471$ line ratios become strongly quenched as $\tau(3889)$ increases before subsequently becoming large again as the line ratios approach local thermodynamical equilibrium (LTE) at very high $\tau(3889)$. The same qualitative behavior occurs as function of the electron density as shown in the lower panels. The line ratios are therefore useful as a diagnostic of these parameters.
The black vertical lines in this figure show the best fit values of $\tau(3889)$ or $n_{\rm e}$ to the observations at +20 days (dashed lines) and +52 days (dotted lines). However, the best fit values of $\tau(3889)$ and $n_{\rm e}$ depend both on each other and on the electron temperature. In Fig. \[fig:He\_chi2\] we show the $\chi^2$ value of the best fit as function of these parameters at +20 and +52 days for $T_{\rm e}=7 \times 10^3$ K. There is obviously a strong correlation between the best fit values of $\tau(3889)$ and $n_{\rm e}$. Nevertheless, these figures show that the observations strongly indicate high optical depths for the $\lambda~3889$ line, $\tau(3889) \gtrsim 10^3$, as well as a moderately high electron density, $10^5 \lesssim n_{\rm e} \lesssim 10^8 \text{cm}^{-3}$. While we found that the observed lines ratios could be fit in a range of $T_{\rm e}$ between $0.5\text{--}15\times 10^{4}$ K, the acceptable range of density and optical depth is not strongly affected by $T_{\rm e}$ in this range: the best fit CSM parameters are always at high density and optical depth. In addition, $T_{\rm e}\approx7 \times 10^3$ K produces the lowest $\chi^2$ values and is roughly in agreement with the estimated BB temperatures at these epochs.
{width="9cm"} {width="9cm"}
Although we have focused on the optical depth of the $\lambda~3889$ line, optical depths of other lines are also larger than one in the region of the $\tau(3889)$–$n_{\rm e}$ plane favoured by the line ratios. The optical depths vary depending on the level the absorption takes place (e.g., the $\lambda~4471$ line originates from the $2~{^3P}$ level). For instance, the $\lambda~6678$ line, coming from the singlet level $2~{^1P}$, is the line which becomes optically thick last of the lines considered, but is still marginally optically thick for the best fit parameters.
Fig. \[fig:He\_ratios\] shows us why some lines display P-Cygni absorptions while others are dominated by emission. At the high optical depths and densities indicated by our analysis, lines from the lower levels are the ones with the strongest emission. This is a well known result of the branching of emission from higher levels at high optical depth [e.g., @2006agna.book.....O]. E.g., the $\lambda~3889$ line into the $\lambda~7065$ plus $4.3 \mu$m and $\lambda~10830$, while the $\lambda~4471$ line splits into $1.7 \mu$m plus $4.3 \mu$m and $\lambda~7065$. Therefore, The fact that ’red’ lines are the ones showing strong emission is therefore simply explained by the fact that they cannot branch into other lines. Meanwhile, the ’blue’ lines are the ones that trap the photons, which then branch into longer wavelengths. Photons scattered by these therefore emerge at longer wavelengths, resulting in P-Cygni absorptions without the strong emission seen in the redder lines.
Relation to other Type Ibn SNe {#sec:results}
==============================
Owing to the increased discovery rate from optical surveys, two comprehensive reviews of Type Ibn SNe have recently been published, P16 and H17, which include 16 and 22 objects respectively, with some overlap. In this section, we compare the results of our analysis to these literature samples of Type Ibn SNe.
{width="\linewidth"}
Photometrically SN 2018bcc is a typical fast-evolving example of the Type Ibn class. We show this in Fig. \[fig:GriffinParComp\], which is an augmentation of a figure from H17 (their figure 12), with the risetime, decline slope, and peak magnitude in $r$ band of SN 2018bcc indicated by a blue star. The photometric properties of SN 2018bcc fits within the rest of the sample closer to the faster evolving part of the distribution. Paralleling SN 2010al, the Type Ibn SNe with the best early color information [@Pastorello2015a], SN 2018bcc is blue in color at first, becomes redder, before evolving back to the blue again. A comparable color evolution was also seen for SN 2015U ([@Shivvers2016SNSupernova]; H17). Similar to the findings in P16, and as also discussed in several papers on other individual Type Ibn SNe, we find that the radioactive decay of alone cannot explain the bolometric properties of SN 2018bcc and that an additional luminosity input, such as from CSM interaction, is needed.
It is important to note that the correlations seen in Fig. \[fig:GriffinParComp\] do not include upper limits, which make the correlations with risetime unreliable. Luckily, the correlation between decline slope and peak magnitude is not affected by this source of error. From it, we see that brighter Type Ibn SNe tend to decline slightly faster on average, although there is significant scatter that is further impacted by the uncertain contribution of host extinction.
Spectroscopically, the photospheric velocities of the lines, as measured from the minimum of the P-Cygni profile, are similar to those of other Type Ibn SNe discussed by P16, with values around ${\sim1000}$ km s$^{-1}$ at 20 to 60 days past peak. Additionally, we also see evidence of a bump blue-ward of ${\sim}5500$ Å that is likely from a forest of Fe II lines. We also see emission lines from and . A relatively strong emission feature is often detected in Type Ibn SNe (P16), with varying degrees of relative strength of the lines and potentially the nearby line (Fig. \[fig:linesID2\]). Our deep late-time spectra suggest an evolution in the and features, with the former becoming much stronger and the latter almost disappearing[^12]. This could indicate that the mixed and feature quickly wanes after peak for fast-evolving Type Ibn SNe. Interestingly, LSQ12btw and LSQ13ccw, both very rapidly-evolving Type Ibn SNe, showed a relatively weak mixed feature of Mg and O located around ${\sim7700}$ Å.
We do not see a transformation of the relatively narrow emission lines into broader lines ($V\gtrsim4000$ km s$^{-1}$) with strong P-Cygni, as was seen in a few Type Ibn SNe (SN 2010al, ASASSN-15ed, SN 2005la, and SN 2015G). These have sometimes been referred to as transitional Type Ib/Ibn SNe, since their spectra evolve to become more similar to ordinary Type Ib SNe in some cases. Instead, we see the lines profiles of the emission dominated lines become more boxy by day 52, without an obvious strong P-Cygni absorption.
A slight declining trend in the FWHM of the lines was observed for SNe 2006jc, 2014av, and 2002ao, which we do not unambiguously detect in SN 2018bcc. This was interpreted by P16 as a decline in the velocity of the shocked gas regions, perhaps resulting from a steeper density profile of the CSM. We note that, alternatively, a declining FWHM could simply mean that the electron scattering depth decreases and therefore the lines become narrower.
We do not detect strong hydrogen features in our spectra before $+52$ d, though resolved H$\alpha$ *is* detected in the final spectrum with a line profile that is narrower than the lines. H$\alpha$ and other hydrogen features are sometimes seen in Type Ibn SNe and can be similar in strength to the lines.
A relatively strong emission feature is often detected in Type Ibn SNe (P16), with varying degrees of relative strength of the lines and potentially the nearby line (Fig. \[fig:linesID2\]). Interestingly, the fast-evolving Type Ibn SNe LSQ13ccw and LSQ12btw showed relatively weak and . The mixed feature of Mg and O located around ${\sim7700}$ Å evolves in our spectra and becomes weaker at late times, which could indicate that this feature generally wanes quickly past peak for fast-evolving Type Ibn SNe. Finally, we also detect the NIR triplet which has been seen for most Type Ibn SNe that have spectral covering at these wavelengths a few weeks after explosion.
Discussion \[sec:discuss\]
==========================
Two types of Type Ibn SNe? \[sec:twotypes\]
-------------------------------------------
As discussed in the introduction, H17 pointed to the possible existence of two observational sub-types based on the early line profiles. One class shows narrow P-Cygni profiles while the other has He-lines purely in emission[^13]. In SN 2018bcc, all features show narrow P-Cygni with velocity minima around ${\sim1000}$ km s$^{-1}$ at least up to ${+14}$ days. However, in the later spectra, the blue features ($<5000$ Å) keep their narrow P-Cygni profiles while the redder features such as $\lambda\lambda$ 6678, 7065 lose their P-Cygni profiles, which were initially weaker to begin with. Thus, SN 2018bcc cannot cleanly fit into the simple division proposed by H17 based on the presence or lack of the narrow P-Cygni line profiles. This suggests that with higher SNR spectra (especially bluewards of $<5000$ Å) the picture might be more complicated. The same spectrum can both show and not show P-Cygni profiles, which has also been noted in H line profiles of Type IIn SNe [e.g., @Taddia2013a]. Similar to SN 2018bcc, the spectra of the nearby Type Ibn SN 2015G were also found to not fit this simple division [@Shivvers2017].
H17 suggest that the difference between these two observational classes of Type Ibn SNe can be explained by a difference in optical depth; the ones dominated by emission should be optically thin while the ones showing P-Cygni profiles should be optically thick. The mix of scattering dominated P-Cygni lines and emission dominated lines in the spectra of SN 2018bcc shows that this picture is too simplified. As our modeling in Sect. \[sec:HeIFlux\] shows, the mix of P-Cygni and emission-dominated lines in SN 2018bcc are result of the high optical depths and densities in the CSM. In particular, the lines dominated by emission (and lacking a clear P-Cygni at late times), such as the $\lambda\lambda~5876, 6678, 7065$ lines, are all still optically thick. They are emission dominated because they lack other lines to branch into and not due to being optically thin.
So, how are the P-Cygni lines formed? In SN 2018bcc, the line producing region responsible for the P-Cygni profiles is likely to be in the regions of the CSM where $\tau_{\rm e} < 1$ (Sect. \[sec:emiss\]). The ionization of He is expected to be caused by UV and X-rays produced at the shock deep in the interaction region. However, the ionized region responsible for the electron scattering, as well as the He ionization and recombination, is likely to have a moderate $\tau_{\rm e}$. This is the case for a radiative shock where the optical depth of this region is regulated by a balance between the ionizing flux from the shock and the total recombination rate. As discussed in [@Fransson2014], $\tau_{\rm e} \propto V_{\rm shock}^3$, but independent of the mass loss rate of the progenitor. A $V_{\rm shock} \lesssim 10^4$ km s$^{-1}$ results in $\tau_{\rm e} \lesssim 10$, which may only correspond to a fraction of the total column density of the CSM. While in this picture most of the emission and electron scattering may be produced by the entire ionized region outside of the shock, the P-Cygni absorption should originate from the outer part of this region where $\tau_{\rm e} < 1$.
X-rays penetrating increasingly further out into the P-Cygni producing region will lead to stronger emission features, which may fill-in the absorption. This can help explain the gradual shift to more emission dominated line profiles we see in the spectral sequence of SN 2018bcc and of Type Ibn SNe in general.
There is some observational evidence for the existence of X-rays from deep in the interaction region in Type Ibn SNe: both SN 2006jc and SN 2010al had X-ray detections. The X-ray lightcurve of SN 2006jc was seen to peak ${\sim}100$d after the optical [@Immler2008]. SN 2010al had only a marginally significant X-ray detection with Swift/XRT [@Ofek2012a], but there were indications that the peak occurred well after maximum optical light in this case also.
A late X-ray peak is also expected on theoretical grounds. Assuming that He is singly ionized and a solar abundance of metals by mass (which dominate the X-ray absorption), the ratio of photoelectric absorption at 1 keV to electron scattering is $\sim 10^3$, decreasing approximately as $E^{-3}$. Then, the fact that $\tau_{\rm e} \approx 5-10$ means that the X-ray optical depth can be vary large below 10 keV. This estimate only includes the radial optical depth through the ionized region and not the neutral medium outside this zone or scattering within the ionized zone. The actual X-ray absorption may therefore be even larger. As the column density ahead of the shock decreases with time, the optical depth should also decrease and X-rays may leak out, predominantly at high energy. Clumpiness of the medium can speed up this further (by making lower column-density lines of sight possible). Thus, X-rays that are initially trapped would leak out at later times, leading to an X-ray lightcurve that peaks after the optical, such as the one that was observed for SN 2006jc.
In an alternative scenario, H17 suggest that a viewing angle effect in non-spherically symmetric CSM, such as a torus, can be responsible for the two spectral classes. In this case, edge-on and face-on views respectively show or hide the P-Cygni profile. Although we propose a different explanation based on theoretical and observational grounds, viewing angle effects in asymmetric CSM could still play a role.
Risetime and powering mechanism of SN 2018bcc
---------------------------------------------
To date, SN 2018bcc is the best example of a fast Type Ibn SN with a well-sampled early lightcurve. As Table \[tab:risetimes\] shows, risetimes and the shapes of the rising lightcurves of fast Type Ibn SNe have been uncertain. We find that both the rising lightcurve of the previous best candidate, iPTF15ul, and of SN 2018bcc are compatible with a t$^2$ powerlaw. A rising powerlaw index of ${\sim}2$ has been associated with simple expanding fireball models in Type Ia SNe [e.g., @Riess1999]. In the simple fireball model, a t$^2$ powerlaw relationship is expected if the temperature and velocity of the photosphere are nearly constant. The fact that the rise is consistent with the fireball model can offer insights into the CSM environments of Type Ibn SNe and bears further study. In interaction powered SNe with optically thick CSM, the rising lightcurve is likely created by shock breakout occuring inside the CSM [@Chevalier2011]. The shape of this rise powered by diffusion is then sensitive to the density profile and geometry of the CSM [see e.g., @Ofek2010]. Therefore, regularity in the rise of some Type Ibn SNe could be an indication of regularity in these conditions.
Similar to many other Type Ibn SNe, the rapid evolution and brightness of SN 2018bcc cannot be reproduced by a pure -powering scenario, without luminosity input from another powering mechanism. In the case of Type Ibn SNe, which are defined by the spectroscopic signs of interaction with a He-rich CSM, a natural explanation for this additional luminosity is CSM interaction. Using a model of shock-interaction powering from @Chatz2012 we showed that a reasonable mass of dense CSM around the SN could provide the required additional luminosity. We caution that our simplified modeling was performed via visual inspection of the fit for physically plausible values of the model parameters, since we were mainly interested in whether or not CSM interaction could be the potential powering scenario. More sophisticated modeling on the entire Type Ibn SN sample will be required to learn more about the actual values of the model parameters and its limitations.
CSM interaction properties of SN 2018bcc
----------------------------------------
In this section, we discuss whether a consistent picture of the CSM around SN 2018bcc has emerged from our study. In Sect. \[sec:modeling\], we have modeled the CSM properties of SN 2018bcc using both lightcurves and spectra. One way to compare the results from lightcurves and spectra is to estimate the mass-loss rate implied by the analysis or model. However, our lightcurve modeling is based on the work of @Chatz2012, and was designed for slowly evolving high-mass SNe, such as SLSNe. While the simplifying assumptions in this model may be appropriate for SLSNe, they are less so for rapidly evolving low-mass SNe, such as Type Ibn SNe. One particular issue is that the diffusion time of the model will be overestimated for low-mass SNe, causing the model to prefer fits with artificially lower CSM and ejecta masses (see Clark et al. submitted.). Thus, we only use the model to indicate that CSM interaction is a plausible powering mechanism and not to derive the detailed properties of the CSM. For the latter, we rely on our spectral modeling instead. Nevertheless, we estimate mass-loss rates from lightcurve and spectral based methods to act as a comparison.
@Moriya2016 used the peak bolometric luminosities and risetimes of Type Ibn SNe to estimate their explosion properties and CSM densities. For the ejecta density profile assumed in their work, the CSM density parameter D given by their equation 4 requires the observables $L_p$, peak luminosity, and $t_d$, the risetime. Using the values from their work and inserting the peak luminosity and risetime of SN 2018bcc, we obtain $D\approx 3.4 \times 10^{15}$ g cm$^{-1}$, in perfect agreement with the other Type Ibn SNe in their sample. With the wind velocity ($v_w$), we can also estimate the mass-loss rate of the progenitor as $\dot M \approx 4\pi v_w D$, obtaining
$$\dot M \approx 0.07 \left(\frac{v_w}{1000~\text{km}~\text{s}^{-1}}\right) {~M_\odot}~\text{yr}^{-1}$$
Similarly, our CSM interaction lightcurve models can also be used to estimate the mass-loss rate. Assuming a wind-like CSM, the mass loss rates can be derived using $\dot M \approx 4\pi\rho_{csm} R_p^2 v_w$, where $R_p$ is the radius of the constant photosphere assumed in the model and $\rho_{csm}$ is the CSM density in g cm$^{-3}$. For CSM model 2 from Sect. \[sec:modeling\] (Fig. \[fig:arnett\]), we obtain
$$\dot M \approx 0.06 \left(\frac{v_w}{1000~\text{km}~\text{s}^{-1}}\right) {~M_\odot}~\text{yr}^{-1}$$
Using a typical wind velocity suitable for a WR star ($v_w \sim 1.5 \times 10^3$ km s$^{-1}$), we obtain ${\sim}0.1~{~M_\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ for both estimates. Although for the second estimate, the previously noted bias for a lower CSM mass of our model for the case of SN 2018bcc implies that the density, and hence the mass-loss rate, could be higher.
Looking at the spectra, our modeling of the line profile at +52 days in Sect. \[sec:HeIFlux\] resulted in an optical depth $\tau_{\rm e}=8.6 (T_{\rm e}/ 10^4 \ {\rm K})$. In principle this provides an estimate of the mass loss rate. Assuming a wind profile for the outflow with velocity $V_{\rm exp}$
$$\tau_{\rm e} = \int_{R_{\rm in}}^{R_{\rm out}} \frac{\dot M \kappa_{\rm e}}{4 \pi V_{\rm exp} r^2 }dr = \frac{\dot M \kappa_{\rm e}}{4 \pi V_{\rm exp}} \left(\frac{1}{R_{\rm in}}-\frac{1}{R_{\rm out}}\right) $$
For a gas dominated by singly ionized He $ \kappa_{\rm e} \approx 0.1$. The outflow velocity is uncertain. We therefore scale it to $V_{\rm exp} = 1000 {\rm ~km~s^{-1}}$, which is in the observed range $600 - 2000 {\rm ~km~s^{-1}}$ for the H$\alpha$ blue shift and the terminal velocity of the P-Cygni profile (Sect. \[sec:HeIFlux\]). We have only weak constraints on the inner and outer radii of the ionized region, $R_{\rm in}$ and $R_{\rm out}$. If we assume that $R_{\rm in} \ll R_{\rm out}$ only $R_{\rm in}$ is important. As a rough estimate we assume that $R_{\rm in} \approx V_{\text{exp}} t \approx 10^3 {\rm ~km~s^{-1}}\times 46 \ {\rm days} \approx 4.0 \times 10^{14}$ cm. Putting all this together we arrive at
$$\dot M \approx 0.68 \left(\frac{V_{\rm exp}}{1000 {\rm ~km~s^{-1}}}\right)^2 \left(\frac{T_{\rm e}}{10^4 \ \rm K}\right)^{-1/2} \left(1-\frac{R_{\rm in}}{R_{\rm out}}\right)^{-1} \ {~M_\odot}~\text{yr}^{-1} \
\label{eq:mdotspec}$$
When considering this estimate, we note that there are large uncertainties in several of the parameters. While the opacity and outflow speed are probably within a factor two, especially the inner radius and thickness of the region are highly uncertain. On the one hand, a thinner shell would increase the mass loss rate, while a lower expansion velocity would lower the mass loss considerably. Therefore, Eq. \[eq:mdotspec\] should mainly be considered as an order of magnitude estimate.
The optical depths and densities inferred from our modeling in Sect. \[sec:HeIFlux\] can also provide an estimate of the mass-loss rate. However, because the observed lines all come from highly excited levels, estimates of the optical depth require estimates of the fractional populations of these levels. These in turn require detailed modeling of the spectrum, including photoionization, recombination, and collisional processes, i.e. a complete modeling of the SN spectrum, which is out of the scope of this paper. Even without this, we find that both spectra and lightcurve based estimates of the mass-loss rate are very high, in the region associated with eruptive mass-loss in massive stars [@Smith2014c].
Our spectral modeling offers further insight into the properties of the CSM. Modeling of the lines in SN 2018bcc has shown that optical depth and electron density are degenerate and the best fits to the observed line fluxes are all located in a region of high density and optical depth (Sect. \[sec:emiss\]). A high optical depth is also supported by our modeling in Sect. \[sec:HeIFlux\]. As we described in Sect. \[sec:twotypes\], optically thick CSM can help explain the evolution of P-Cygni lines in SN 2018bcc, and probably in Type Ibn SNe.
Based on these results, we conclude that SN 2018bcc has a dense and optically thick CSM environment, with a progenitor that experienced a very high mass-loss rate. Such a high mass-loss rate, combined with the suggestion that the CSM around Type Ibn SNe is in a spatially confined shell [@Moriya2016; @Hosseinzadeh2017], suggests a different mechanism than ordinary steady-state line-driven winds as the likely creator of the CSM around Type Ibn SNe. A potential candidate is eruptive mass-loss via some mechanism such as wave-driven super-Eddington winds [@Quataert2016] or the Pulsational Pair Instability [PPI; @Woosley2007; @Woosley2017], which are both expected to lead to the formation of CSM shells. While there are few observational predictions from the acoustic mechanism, @Fuller2018 predict a mass-loss rate ${\sim}0.1 {~M_\odot}~\text{yr}^{-1}$, in line with our estimates for SN 2018bcc. We discuss the PPI in detail in Sect. \[sec:PPI\].
Narrow ($\lesssim 1000$ km s$^{-1}$) but clearly resolved H$\alpha$ is seen in the final spectrum of SN 2018bcc, though it is blueshifted by $300 {\rm ~km~s^{-1}}$ (Appendix, Fig. \[fig:mgca\]), representing the systematic redshift uncertainty of SN 2018bcc. It does not show a boxy profile unlike the lines in this spectrum. In order to explain the appearance of H$\alpha$ we consider two cases. In the first case, the ejecta or CSM are catching up with slower and more H-rich material ejected previously. However, in this case one would expect similar widths for the H and He lines, contrary to the observations. Alternatively, this H-rich material may be located much further out, and is instead being photo-ionized by X-rays produced in the interaction region. This would explain the lower velocity of the H-rich material. We discuss this possibility further in the next section. We note that a successful model of CSM interaction in SN 2018bcc would need to both explain the peculiarities of the lines profiles, as well as the late-time rise of narrower H$\alpha$.
Comparison with pulsational pair-instability supernova models \[sec:PPI\]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
@Woosley2017 [hereafter W17] discussed the possibility that Type Ibn SNe may be the result of pulsational pair instability (PPI) SNe. These have an origin in high-mass stars with He-core masses between $30 \text{--} 64$ ${~M_\odot}$, corresponding to ZAMS masses of 70–140 ${~M_\odot}$ (with a large uncertainty due to unknown mass-loss rates). As such massive stars approach the pair instability region, they undergo violent nuclear flashes that send strong enough pulses to eject any H-envelope, as well as parts of the He-core. The number of pulses and the duration between each pulse varies strongly with the He-core mass. The durations range from hours to a few thousand years, with more energetic pulses leading to a larger interval (W17). Interaction between shells ejected in these pulses, or if energetic enough an ejection in itself, can create SN-like transients referred to as PPI SNe.
Both the luminosities and the shape of the lightcurves of the resulting SNe vary strongly with the He-core mass. In particular, the peak luminosity and the rising part of the lightcurve vary strongly between different models, which is a result of both the energy in the pulses and the time interval between pulses. Unlike pair instability SNe, PPISNe leave behind a massive ($>30 {~M_\odot}$) remnant that (eventually) undergoes CC, either directly forming a black hole or possibly exploding as a SN. Due to the altered composition of the remnant, a neutrino driven explosion is thought to be unlikely (W17). Hence, the possible contribution of a final CC SN is ignored in the proceeding discussion.
![Comparison of the bolometric lightcurve of SN 2018bcc, including errors (grey, shaded region), with the bolometric lightcurves of the He42 (green), He58 (blue) and He60 (red) models from W17.[]{data-label="fig:WoosleyPPISNComp"}](Figures/bol_lum_18bcc_He_42_58_60_err.pdf){width="1.0\linewidth"}
Although suggested before, there have been few direct comparisons of model PPISN lightcurves with Type Ibn observations. We have therefore used our bolometric lightcurve for a comparison with the W17 models of He stars. The models are named such that the He-core mass of a model is indicated by the number; e.g., He50 is a 50 ${~M_\odot}$ He-core mass model. In Fig. \[fig:WoosleyPPISNComp\] we compare our bolometric lightcurve with the lightcurves of the He42, He58, and He60 models from W17 (his fig. 6). It is important to stress again that the lightcurves of the models vary significantly with He-core mass in a non-linear way. In fact, the lightcurves of the high-mass models (He58 and He60) are formed in a different way than the lightcurve of the low-mass model (He42).
The He42 model is included as an example at the lower mass-range for a PPISN and was among the models discussed by W17 as a possible candidate for a Type Ibn SN. The duration of pulsations in the lower mass-range models is only a few days and hence the energetics are lower. In total, He42 ejects $2.65 {~M_\odot}$ of material in several pulses that power the lightcurve seen in Fig. \[fig:WoosleyPPISNComp\]. The luminosity of the He42 model is a factor of $\sim 5$ lower than that of SN 2018bcc. The total radiated energy is similarly lower; $\sim 3.9 \times 10^{48}$ ergs for the He42 model while it is $\sim 2.1 \times 10^{49}$ ergs for SN 2018bcc. The effective temperature at the peak was $23 \times 10^4$ K in the model compared to the observed $\sim 15 \times 10^4$ K. These differences with SN 2018bcc also apply to the He40 and He44 models.
For intermediate-mass models He48–He54, the lightcurves all have multiple peaks as a result of colliding shells emitted within months to a few years before collapse. Hence, despite the fact that the peak luminosities of these models are in the range of that of SN 2018bcc, the overall widths of these lightcurves are far too broad. Therefore, these models are excluded for SN 2018bcc.
Higher-mass models, such as He58 and He60, have fewer but more energetic pulses and a much longer duration between the first and second pulse, on the order of thousands of years. However, similar to the lower-mass models, the later pulses occur on a time scale of days and the ejected shells merge on a short time scale resulting in a smooth lightcurve. Therefore, as can be seen in Fig. \[fig:WoosleyPPISNComp\], the lightcurves of the He58 and He60 models are in better agreement with the observed bolometric luminosity of SN 2018bcc and are consistent with it given the limitations of the models. These lightcurves do not show the first pulse which occurred thousands of years prior that is predicted to be optically faint.
The He58 and He60 models have total radiated energies of $\sim 4.4 \times 10^{49}$ ergs and $\sim 1.9 \times 10^{49}$ ergs, respectively. This is more similar to the total radiated energy for SN 2018bcc, $\sim 2.1 \times 10^{49}$ ergs, than the lower mass He42 model. In the latter pulses, they expel $4.8{~M_\odot}$ and $2.0{~M_\odot}$ of material for the He58 and He60 models, respectively[^14]. They also have effective temperatures in the range of $8,000\text{--}12,000$ K, which is consistent with the observed temperatures for SN 2018bcc (Fig. \[fig:BBtemps\]).
The ejecta velocity is another important diagnostic. For the low-mass models, the photospheric velocities are expected to be in the range of $2000\text{--}4000 {\rm ~km~s^{-1}}$. Meanwhile for He58 and He60, the resulting velocity only varies between $2500-3000 {\rm ~km~s^{-1}}$. The He lines in SN 2018bcc have FWHM velocities in the range of the PPISN models (Sections \[sec:Helines\] and \[sec:HeIFlux\]). Although, the observed bulk velocity can be lower due to CSM interaction (Sect. \[sec:HeIFlux\]).
While this comparison is very interesting, there are a number of caveats when comparing observations to the models. The largest uncertainty in the observed lightcurves comes from the bolometric correction estimate, due to the lack of UV and NIR data. We have tried to correct for this when calculating the bolometric correction, but there are likely to be considerable uncertainties, as shown by the shaded area in Fig. \[fig:WoosleyPPISNComp\]. Nevertheless, the observational uncertainties are relatively minor compared to those of the models.
Comparing different model calculations [e.g., W17; @Yoshida2016; @Marchant2018; @Leung2019], there is broad agreement in terms of energies, number of pulses, and ejected masses. However, there are considerable quantitative differences between models in the literature for the same helium core mass. Furthermore, small differences in He core mass can cause large difference in the lightcurves for the same model calculations, since lightcurve behavior is very sensitive to the He core mass. These one-dimensional models cannot account for instabilities caused by shell interactions, which are likely to be important and to modify the hydrodynamic structure. When comparing with observations, additional uncertainty comes from the fact that the lightcurves of the W17 models are only bolometric, with no color information, and the only opacity source included when calculating the lightcurves is electron scattering and line absorption is neglected. Since all of these factors are important, differences by a factor of two or more are not unexpected.
Nevertheless, there are many agreements between the observational properties of SN 2018bcc and theoretical predictions for PPISNe. In addition to what has been mentioned previously, the appearance of the narrow H$\alpha$ line at late times can be readily accounted for; it may originate from a more distant shell produced by an earlier ejection, possibly the first pulsation, which ejected most of the hydrogen envelope. We infer a relatively low metallicity for the host galaxy of SN 2018bcc, in agreement with observations by @Hosseinzadeh2019 for several other Type Ibn SNe. Line-driven stellar winds are less efficient at low metallicity, and hence massive stars can more easily survive past the Main-Sequence with larger envelope masses, which are necessary for PPISNe. The late decline of SN 2018bcc and several other fast Type Ibn SNe which seem to lack a radioactive decay tail is also readily explained in the PPISN scenario[^15]. Finally, the most important test for the PPISN scenario is that the ejected material should not show enhanced abundances from elements resulting from advanced nucleosynthesis. Despite the fact that a few Type Ibn SNe evolve to show more ejecta-like spectra, we do not detect evidence of SN ejecta or enhanced abundances of elements from advanced nucleosynthesis in the spectra of SN 2018bcc, matching previous observations of a few other fast Type Ibn SNe [see e.g., @Pastorello2015]. Thus, some luminous and fast Type Ibn SNe with these characteristics are attractive candidates to be PPISN explosions, even if other Type Ibn SNe may not be. Additionally, the eventual CC of the remnant, which we did not consider in this discussion due to the large unknowns, may be able to produce ejecta-like spectra seen in some Type Ibn SNe.
One of the predictions of PPI is the depletion of oxygen. Thus, a lack of strong oxygen in late-time spectra (like what we see in SN 2018bcc), can also be a litmus test for PPI in Type Ibn SNe. Interestingly, the late-time spectra of SN 2006jc also lack oxygen, similar to most other Type Ibn SNe. Even in SN 2015G, which is one of the few Type Ibn SNe with more ejecta-like late time spectra, the oxygen line flux was much lower compared to ordinary SE SNe [@Shivvers2017].
Observations that can further test the PPISN scenario for Type Ibn SNe include a study of early and late-time brightening in Type Ibn SNe, as either pulsations or shell-interaction can lead to pre and post SN brightening. However, since the time between pulsations and the duration of pulsations varies widely between hours and days to thousands of years, a statistical study is necessary. On the modeling front, lightcurves from two-dimensional models with realistic stellar envelopes and evolution are needed for a fruitful comparison to observations.
Progenitor of SN 2018bcc
------------------------
Type Ibn SNe have been suggested to be the CC of massive Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars exploding into dense and He-rich CSM. Like for other Type Ibn SNe in literature, the CSM around the progenitor of SN 2018bcc would have to have been ejected via a mechanism with a very high mass-loss rate. The SN also seems to be powered by CSM interaction, with little . In this progenitor scenario, a normal CC SN explosion could be hidden beneath the CSM interaction powered lightcurve. Even if it came out that there is less than expected, one possible way to explain a low mass while still having a CC SN could be via fall-back onto the central compact object. However, looking at the available observational evidence, we cannot conclude that this progenitor scenario is the only possibility.
SN 2018bcc is located in a low metallicity environment. It seems to be powered by CSM interaction, with little or no , and is a rapidly evolving and fading SN with a relatively low total radiated energy of $\approx 2.1 \times 10^{49}$ erg (low for an interaction powered SN). The spectra neither show direct evidence of nucleosynthesis nor fast, SN-like, ejecta (velocities ${\sim} \text{10,000}~{\rm ~km~s^{-1}}$). Therefore, it is also worth exploring the possibility that SN 2018bcc, and perhaps other fast Type Ibn SNe, are not terminal CC SNe. As discussed in Sect. \[sec:PPI\], if the progenitor of SN 2018bcc was a massive star in a low-metallicity environment, the lightcurve and interaction properties (from the spectra) could be the result of the collision of CSM shells ejected via *some* mechanism, such as the PPI. In this alternative scenario, the progenitor of SN 2018bcc is a very massive star whose remnant may even collapse to form a blackhole, either directly or as a failed SN [e.g., @Gerke2015].
In the case of PS1-12sk, the only Type Ibn SN to have exploded outside of an elliptical galaxy with deep limits on the star formation rate, @Sanders2013 and @Hosseinzadeh2019 evoked the possibility that the progenitor was a white-dwarf system. For SN 2018bcc, the rapidly declining lightcurve and lack of also makes thermonuclear explosions an unlikely progenitor scenario. As noted in the study of Type Ibn SN host environments by @Hosseinzadeh2019, all Type Ibn SNe may not even share a common progenitor. Various progenitor systems can create interaction powered SNe with strong emission lines. It seems that in the case of SN 2018bcc, either the CC of a WR star or non-terminal ejection into a dense, He-rich CSM, are possible progenitor scenarios. PPI is one plausible mechanism that can give rise to either. Ultimately, the nature of the progenitors of fast Type Ibn SNe remains unknown.
AT2018cow
---------
As seen in Fig. \[fig:GriffinParComp\], SN 2018bcc is a fast Type-Ibn SN that is otherwise ordinary. Remarkably, the photometric properties of the enigmatic transient AT2018cow are not that different from SN 2018bcc or other fast Type Ibn SNe. Furthermore, AT2018cow developed post-peak emission features that look similar to many other Type Ibn SNe [@Perley2019], along with several other spectral similarities. These similarities were highlighted in a recent paper by @Fox2019, who discussed the CSM interaction scenario for AT2018cow in detail (however see [@Wang2019]). We note that in our basic modeling, SN 2018bcc could be mostly powered for characteristic ejecta velocities $\gtrsim 0.1c$. Although we lack any evidence for such relativistic ejecta in SN 2018bcc, and thus discount this possibility, AT2018cow had an early broad feature with just such a high velocity [@Perley2019]. If CSM interaction can explain the observables of AT2018cow, then, just like other Type Ibn SNe, it might be a viable PPISN candidate. In this scenario, very high velocity ejecta seen at early times could be coming from the CC of the remnant shortly after the cessation of pulsations, while the CSM interaction in the ejected shells can explain other observables. If AT2018cow is indeed similar to fast Type Ibn SNe, further study of this nearby enigmatic object might also illumine the mystery surrounding Type Ibn SNe, or vice versa.
Conclusion {#sec:concl}
==========
We have studied the rapidly evolving Type Ibn SN 2018bcc and have obtained the best constraints on the combined risetime and shape of the rising lightcurve for this type of fast Type Ibn SN. It has a risetime of $5.6^{+0.2}_{-0.1}$ days in the restframe with a rising powerlaw index close to two. Photometrically and spectroscopically, SN 2018bcc seems to be a typical but fast-evolving member of the Type Ibn SN class.
Modeling of the bolometric lightcurve suggests that cannot be the sole powering-mechanism for this SN, even when accounting for gamma-ray leakage. An additional luminosity input is needed, which we show with our simple modeling can readily be provided by CSM interaction. Our spectral modeling suggests that the line profiles have strong electron scattering wings and thus are likely not representing the expansion velocity. Furthermore, the observed line flux ratios suggest optically thick CSM and a high electron density, $10^5 \lesssim n_{\rm e} \lesssim 10^8 \text{cm}^{-3}$. In addition, the lines are all optically thick even at $+52$ days.
The CSM around SN2018bcc is likely produced by a high mass-loss rate of ${\sim}0.1~{~M_\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$, which suggests an alternative formation mechanism, such as eruptive mass-loss. We also do not find strong evidence of CC SN signatures. As a result, SN 2018bcc could be the result of a CC SN interacting with a He-rich CSM ejected in an eruptive episode, or possibly the interaction of CSM shells ejected via an eruptive mechanism, such as the PPI mechanism. We showed that given all of the available evidence, SN 2018bcc (and by extension other fast Type Ibn SNe), are viable PPISN candidates.
We found that the simple spectral classification scheme proposed by H17, based on the evolution of the narrow P-Cygni profiles of , does not neatly fit SN 2018bcc. We see features both with and without narrow P-Cygni profiles in the same spectra, with P-Cygni profiles present in the blue part and emission dominated features in the red part of the spectrum. Furthermore, their explanation that optical depth effects can explain the discrepancy is found to be too simplified, since all lines are still optically thick. Instead, the branching of emission from higher levels in a He atom at high optical depths is likely responsible for the creation of P-Cygni profiles. Lines that lack branching possibilities become emission dominated, e.g., redder lines like $\lambda~7065$.
The nature of Type Ibn SNe remains an ongoing mystery. There are even possible associations to extreme events such as AT2018cow, which has been shown to share many observational similarities to the class. We reiterate that more sophisticated modeling on a large sample of Type Ibn SNe is required to answer questions regarding their progenitors, CSM conditions, and powering mechanisms. As of today, observations are lacking to undertake this type of population study for Type Ibn SNe (often done for other SN sub-types). Primarily, there is a lack of early-time photometric observations that can constrain the shape of the rise and peak of these objects, and virtually no color information for the early lightcurves except for a few specific cases [see e.g., @Hosseinzadeh2017]. The lack of early time data also makes estimating the explosion epoch difficult, which is a necessary step for lightcurve modeling. Since Type Ibn SN lightcurves decline rapidly, we often also lack nebular spectroscopy which might be able to tell us more about the ejecta and SN properties, such as expansion velocities. Finally, there have been no systematic exploration of the CSM interaction in Type Ibn SNe in radio and X-rays, as has been deeply studied for Type IIn SNe for instance.
This paper was written with the aim of reporting early results from the ZTF survey with an example of a unique rapidly-evolving SN discovered shortly after the start of the public ZTF survey in March 2018. As the case of SN 2018bcc shows, robotic surveys like the ZTF can be used to discover a sample of well-observed candidates required to undertake a sample study of Type Ibn SNe.
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation and the Swedish Research Council. Based on observations obtained with the Samuel Oschin Telescope 48-inch and the 60-inch Telescope at the Palomar Observatory as part of the Zwicky Transient Facility project. Major funding has been provided by the U.S National Science Foundation under Grant No. AST-1440341 and by the ZTF partner institutions: the California Institute of Technology, the Oskar Klein Centre, the Weizmann Institute of Science, the University of Maryland, the University of Washington, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and the TANGO Program of the University System of Taiwan. The Oskar Klein Centre is funded by the Swedish Research Council. This research is partially based on observations made with the Nordic Optical Telescope, operated by NOTSA at IAC using ALFOSC, which is provided by the IAA. Some of the data presented herein were obtained at the W.M. Keck Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership among the California Institute of Technology, the University of California, and NASA; the observatory was made possible by the generous financial support of the W.M. Keck Foundation. Some of the data presented herein were obtained with the Liverpool Telescope operated on the island of La Palma by Liverpool John Moores University in the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias with financial support from the UK Science and Technology Facilities Council. This work is partly based on observations made with DOLoRes@TNG. This research made use of Astropy, a community-developed core Python package for Astronomy (Astropy Collaboration, 2018) IRAF, is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation. The python version which was used, PyRAF, is a product of the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by AURA for NASA. SED Machine is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1106171. We would like to thank E. Ofek for his comments on the manuscript.
Constructing the bolometric lightcurve {#app:bololc}
=======================================
There are three standard methods of constructing a bolometric lightcurve for CC SNe. In the simplest method, the SED is integrated directly (typically using trapezoidal integration), as much as observations permit, and the resulting flux is converted to a quasi-bolometric lightcurve that only accounts for the light in the observed part of the SED. This method is the best when an abundance of observations across the electro-magnetic (EM) spectrum exists for an object.
In the second method, the direct integrated quasi-bolometric lightcurve is extrapolated into the IR and UV by using a combination of fits to the SED (commonly using a blackbody) to estimate parts that are outside of the observed range. Typically a correction is then applied to the blackbody fit to account for heavy line blanketing present in the UV, which is usually not sampled by the observations [@Lusk2017]. This integrated flux can be converted to a bolometric luminosity using the known distance to the SN.
A third method involves calculating a bolometric correction to the observed SED when observations are limited. These corrections are calculated from another property, usually color, and calibrated using well observed (and nearby) SNe so that a simple parametrized relation between color and the bolometric correction is empirically calculated [see e.g., @Lyman2013]. However, such a parametrized relation does not yet exist for Type Ibn SNe. As a result, creating a pseudo-bolometric lightcurve for a Type Ibn SN often entails obtaining photometry across the EM spectrum.
Steps for SN 2018bcc
--------------------
In order to create the bolometric lightcurve, we first use our spectra to create a quasi-bolometric lightcurve via direct integration. We use the common range from $4000-8500$ Å for direct integration, but we had to remove the LT spectrum as it does not extend beyond $7500$ Å. However, since this spectrum is very close in time to the SEDM spectrum (1.5 days in the restframe), we do not lose much information in this way.
We then extend this region to the UV and NIR by using our BB fits. We integrate the BB fits from $3300-4000$ Å to include the UV up to the left edge of the U-band and from $8500$ Å to effectively infinity to include the NIR. Following other authors [e.g., @Lyman2013] we cut off the SED for wavelengths shorter than 2000 Å, since there should be strong line blanketing there. We then interpolate from zero flux at 2000 Å to the value of the BB fit at 3300 Å (the left edge of the typical U-band), as most optical lightcurves of SNe extend to this range, and show it to be well-fit by a blackbody [see e.g., @Lyman2013].
We convert the integrated flux from this exercise into bolometric magnitudes and calculate a bolometric correction to the $r$-band absolute magnitude lightcurve at the epochs of the spectra. Next, we employ the secondary method and find a simple linear relation between the bolometric corrections we calculated and the $g-r$ color at the same epochs, following the approach of @Lyman2013. The relation between the $g-r$ band and the bolometric correction is plotted in Fig. \[fig:bolo\]. We find that a flat (zeroth order) linear fit best describes the relation between the bolometric corrections and the $g-r$ color at the same epochs; a bolometric correction $\approx -0.12 \pm 0.02$ mag. We also tested using first and second degree polynomials to characterize this relation and find that our results do not change.
Since a zeroth order correction is preferred using the $g-r$ color, we also look for a relation between phase and bolometric correction using the interpolated $r-$band lightcurve, which yield the same result. Additionally, we use GP regression to learn the relationship between phase and bolometric-correction and calculate a bolometric lightcurve this way. The resulting bolometric lightcurve is very similar to using a zeroth order bolometric correction as a function of color or phase. Thus, we use our simple bolometric correction to calculate the bolometric lightcurve, as illustrated in Fig. \[fig:bolo\].
Finally, we also tested the effects of varying our assumptions when deriving the bolometric correction from the spectra. These tests included using just a simple BB fit, as well as varying the assumptions in the UV, and still found that the resulting bolometric lightcurves were all similar to our desired accuracy.
![**Top:** The bolometric lightcurve of SN 2018bcc. The results from methods discussed in Sect. \[sec:bolo\] are plotted with different colors and agree within the uncertainties. **Bottom:** Fits to the bolometric correction (BC) as a function of phase, obtained via methods discussed in Sect. \[sec:bolo\] and Appendix \[app:bololc\]. The resulting bolometric lightcurve from these methods are plotted in the top panel.[]{data-label="fig:bolo"}](Figures/bololc4.pdf "fig:"){width="\linewidth"}\
![**Top:** The bolometric lightcurve of SN 2018bcc. The results from methods discussed in Sect. \[sec:bolo\] are plotted with different colors and agree within the uncertainties. **Bottom:** Fits to the bolometric correction (BC) as a function of phase, obtained via methods discussed in Sect. \[sec:bolo\] and Appendix \[app:bololc\]. The resulting bolometric lightcurve from these methods are plotted in the top panel.[]{data-label="fig:bolo"}](Figures/BoloCorr.pdf "fig:"){width="0.96\linewidth"}
Figures
=======
{width="18cm"}
Tables
======
[llllll]{} 233.83 & 2.19 & P60 & SEDM & 3575$-$8629 & [$\sim$]{}100\
235.54 & 3.80 & LT & SPRAT & 3782$-$7521 & [$\sim$]{}350\
243.50 & 11.28 & NOT & ALFOSC & 3333$-$9112 & [$\sim$]{}360\
246.92 & 14.50 & P200 & DBSP & 3198$-$9878 & [$\sim$]{}1423\
252.89 & 20.11 & Keck & LRIS & 2897$-$9679 & 922 $\pm$ 34\
287.00 & 52.18 & Keck & LRIS & 2900$-$9674 & 905 $\pm$ 26\
[llll]{} 3889 & 925, 953, 1350 & 1914, 1830, 1618 & 1830, 1860, 1040$^\text{a}$\
4471$^\text{b}$& 800, 845, 1174 & 1550, 1750, 1850 & 1020, 1380, 1790$^\text{a}$\
4922$^\text{c}$& 834, 1087, - & 1400, 1590, - & 1107$^\text{a}$, 704, 2920$^\text{a}$\
5016$^\text{d}$& 1157, 1221, - & 1745, 1954, - & 755 , 721, 2600$^\text{a}$\
5876 & 1000, 1020, - & 1600, 1356, - & 3000, 3020, 3000\
6678 & 990, 1070, - & 1470, 1428, - & 1950, 2080, 1650\
7065 & 1060, - , - & 1645, - , - & 2520, 2100, 1871$^\text{a}$\
[^1]: By “fast Type Ibn SNe” we mean rapidly evolving members of this class with risetimes $\lesssim 1$ week.
[^2]: https://wis-tns.weizmann.ac.il/object/2018bcc/discovery-cert
[^3]: https://wis-tns.weizmann.ac.il/object/2018bcc
[^4]: <http://ztf.caltech.edu>
[^5]: The ZTF filter profiles can be found at: <https://github.com/ZwickyTransientFacility/ztf_information>
[^6]: The photometry is made available publicly via <give link to photometry on WiseRep in final version>
[^7]: Image Reduction and Analysis Facility.
[^8]: Obtained from the Spanish Virtual Observatory Filter Profile Service (SVO), http://svo2.cab.inta-csic.es/theory/fps3/index.php
[^9]: National Institute of Standards and Technology, https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/Handbook/Tables/heliumtable2.htm
[^10]: Which was obtained from the SDSS.
[^11]: The NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
[^12]: While this evolution was not reported in the samples of P16 and H17, the reason could be the paucity of their late-time spectra.
[^13]: H17 note that this division may also represent a continuum of Type Ibn SNe with short and long-lived P-Cygni lines.
[^14]: The first pulse expels ${\sim}10 {~M_\odot}$, which should now be located at several hundred to a few thousand AU.
[^15]: Although, the ultimate fate of the remnant in producing a CC SN is unknown.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'Deep Reinforcement Learning has been shown to be very successful in complex games, e.g. Atari or Go. These games have clearly defined rules, and hence allow simulation. In many practical applications, however, interactions with the environment are costly and a good simulator of the environment is not available. Further, as environments differ by application, the optimal inductive bias (architecture, hyperparameters, etc.) of a reinforcement agent depends on the application. In this work, we propose a multi-arm bandit framework that selects from a set of different reinforcement learning agents to choose the one with the best inductive bias. To alleviate the problem of sparse rewards, the reinforcement learning agents are augmented with surrogate rewards. This helps the bandit framework to select the best agents early, since these rewards are smoother and less sparse than the environment reward. The bandit has the double objective of maximizing the reward while the agents are learning and selecting the best agent after a finite number of learning steps. Our experimental results on standard environments show that the proposed framework is able to consistently select the optimal agent after a finite number of steps, while collecting more cumulative reward compared to selecting a sub-optimal architecture or uniformly alternating between different agents.'
author:
- |
Andreas Merentitis[^1]\
OLX Berlin Hub\
Ella-Trebe-Straße 3, 10557 Berlin, Germany\
`[email protected]`\
Kashif Rasul\
Zalando Reasearch\
Mühlenstrasse 25, 10243 Berlin, Germany\
Roland Vollgraf\
Zalando Reasearch\
Mühlenstrasse 25, 10243 Berlin, Germany\
Abdul-Saboor Sheikh\
Zalando Reasearch\
Mühlenstrasse 25, 10243 Berlin, Germany\
Urs Bergmann\
Zalando Reasearch\
Mühlenstrasse 25, 10243 Berlin, Germany\
`[email protected]`\
title: A Bandit Framework for Optimal Selection of Reinforcement Learning Agents
---
Introduction
============
Reinforcement learning has been successfully used in numerous application domains, from robot control [@DBLP:conf/cdc/GrondmanBB12], [@DBLP:journals/tsmc/AdamBB12] to investment management and board games. Recent advances in the field such as [@DBLP:journals/tsmc/GrondmanBLB12], [@icml2014c1_silver14], [@DBLP:journals/corr/ODonoghueMKM16], [@DBLP:journals/corr/NachumNXS17] have enabled state of the art reinforcement learning systems to steer autonomous cars, compete with the human champions in games such as Chess and Go, as well as achieve superhuman performance in many of the old classic Atari games [@DBLP:journals/corr/MnihBMGLHSK16], [@DBLP:journals/corr/SchulmanLMJA15]. Reinforcement learning in its most basic form includes an agent that interacts with its environment by taking actions. As a result of these actions there is a change of state and the agent might also receive a reward. The goal of the system is to learn an optimal policy, i.e. learning how to act so that it can maximize its cumulative reward.
In many practical reinforcement learning settings, we do not have access to a perfect simulator of the environment and interacting with the real environment is costly. In addition, we want to gain good rewards even early on, while the agent is still learning the environment dynamics. Model-based reinforcement learning assumes a priori a certain model class for the environment dynamics which can be beneficial (e.g., reducing the interactions with the environment needed to learn) if the model is close to the true dynamics, but detrimental (biasing the agent’s actions) if it is not. While this restriction is removed in model-free reinforcement learning, the architecture of the agent is also encoding prior beliefs about the environment and its transition dynamics (for example regarding the level of noise, assuming full observability or not, etc.). At the same time, if interactions with the environment are costly, learning multiple agents that represent different beliefs about the environment dynamics quickly becomes expensive. In this paper we are trying to systematically address two questions: “how can we maximize rewards while learning?” and “how to select the optimal agent configuration (and consequently policy) after a finite number of learning steps?”
In order to address these questions we consider a bandit framework on top of a set of reinforcement learning agents. Our goal then is to take actions (pull levers in bandit terminology, which corresponds to selecting one of several RL agents in this framework) so as to minimize the regret, i.e. the difference in reward between the sequence of selections that we have made and the sequence of selections performed by an oracle that always makes the best choice.
In addition to the bandit framework, we also consider augmenting the environment reward with an agent specific surrogate reward, that captures the inherent ability of the agent to understand the dynamics of the environment. This surrogate reward is inspired by the Variational Information Maximizing Exploration idea [@DBLP:journals/corr/HouthooftCDSTA16], where a similar metric, which captures the surprise of the agent regarding the environment dynamics, is used to favor exploration of the state space (based on equation \[eq:4\]). However, in this work the surrogate reward is used to facilitate early selection between alternative agent architectures and gather more reward while learning.
The rest of the paper is structured as follows. Some background information on bandits and reinforcement learning, as well as an outline of the state of the art, is provided in Section 2. The proposed framework for optimizing the reward while learning and facilitating the selection of an optimal agent after a finite number of steps is elaborated in Section 3. This part introduces also the idea of an augmented surrogate reward that is both smoother and less sparse than the actual reward of the environment and discusses how such a reward can be derived from agents that employ Bayesian Neural Networks. Experimental results for several environments including some classic locomotion reinforcement learning problems as well as a few more modern Atari environments are given in Section 4. Finally section 5 provides some concluding remarks.
Background
==========
In reinforcement learning we assume a Markov Decision Process (MDP), defined by its state space X, its action space U, its transition probability function $f : X \times U \times X \rightarrow [0, \infty)$, and its reward function $\rho : X \times U \times X \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$. At every discrete time step $t$, given the state $x_t$ , the agent selects an action $u_{t}$ according to a policy $h : X \rightarrow U$. The probability that the next state $x_{t+1}$ falls in a region $X_{t+1} \subset X$ of the state space can then be expressed by $\int_{X_{t+1}} f(x_{t} , u_{t} , x' ) dx' $. For any $x$ and $u$, $f (x, u, \cdot)$ is assumed to define a valid probability density of the argument “$\cdot$”. After the transition to $x_{t+1}$, a (possibly stochastic) reward $r_{t+1}$ is derived according to the reward function $\rho$ : $r_{t+1} = \rho (x_{t} , u_{t} , x_{t+1} )$. The reward depends on the current and next state, as well as the current action – but even conditioned on these it is generally drawn from a probability distribution (for non deterministic MPDs). For deterministic MDPs, the transition probability function $f$ can be replaced by the transition function, $f : X \times U \rightarrow X$, and the reward can be fully determined by the current state and action: $r_{t+1} =
\overline {\rho} (x_{t} , u_{t})$, $\overline {\rho} : X \times U \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$.
The goal is to find an optimal policy $h^*$ that maximizes the expected return for every initial state $x_{0}$. In practice, the accumulated return must be maximized using only feedback about the immediate, one-step reward. Every policy $h$ is characterized by its state-action value function (Q-function), $Q^h : X \times U \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$, which gives the return when starting in a given state, applying a given action, and following $h$ from that point onward. For any $h$, $Q^h$ is unique and can be found by solving the Bellman expectation equation, while the optimal Q-function is defined as $Q^* (x, u) = \max_{h} Q^h (x, u)$, and satisfies the Bellman optimality equation.
Multi-arm bandits can be considered a special case of reinforcement learning, in which the Markov decision process only has one state and the actions cannot change the environment, but the MDP is not deterministic in the sense that the rewards are drawn from a probability distribution. Formally, a bandit seeks to minimize the difference (regret) between the actions of an oracle that always selects the best action and the choices we make using the bandit strategy.
Different types of bandit strategies are possible, from simple $\epsilon$-greedy, to more sophisticated techniques like SoftMax (probability matching bandit), UCB1 (a bandit based on the optimism in the face of uncertainty principle) and EXP3 (adversarial bandit). For a more thorough discussion of bandit algorithms please refer to dedicated survey papers like [@Vermorel2005multi].
Multi-arm bandit framework
==========================
In many real world reinforcement learning settings, a good simulator of the environment is not available. Further, interactions with the environment are costly, either directly (e.g., having an immediate negative monetary impact in case of incorrect decisions) or indirectly (e.g., negatively affecting customer perception). In such cases, we are particularly motivated to get high rewards even early on while the agent is still learning the environment dynamics. In model-free reinforcement learning, the agents architecture reflects our prior beliefs about the environment and its transition dynamics (for example regarding the level of noise, observability assumptions, etc.). Typically though, we are not certain in advance which of these prior beliefs are true and to what extent, therefore trying multiple agent architectures might be beneficial. However, if interactions with the environment are costly, learning multiple agents that represent different beliefs about the environment dynamics quickly becomes expensive. The goal of the multi-arm bandit framework is to maximize rewards while learning, but to also provide a systematic method for selecting an optimal agent from a set of candidates, after a finite number of learning steps.
The bandit framework is supplemented by agent specific surrogate rewards that capture the inherent ability of the agents to model the environment. These surrogate rewards are inspired by the Variational Information Maximizing Exploration concept, where a metric capturing the surprise of an agent regarding the environment dynamics is used to promote exploration of the state space. The key idea behind introducing a surrogate reward metric is that the true environment rewards can be very sparse and noisy, especially early on while the agents are still learning [@DBLP:journals/corr/HouthooftCDSTA16]. Since we are interested in putting the bulk of our actions on agents that are at least promising in their ability to learn the dynamics of the environment (compared for the same amount of exploration), this less sparse reward is a good way to achieve that goal. One of the key contributions of our work over standard VIME is that we use the surrogate reward as a way to guide the selection of different reinforcement learning algorithms by the bandits. More specifically, the properties of this surrogate reward being smoother and capturing how “surprised” the agents are from the responses of the environment are also very beneficial, both with respect to focusing early onto the most promising agents, as well as on being able to select the best agent after a relatively small number of steps.
It has been shown in [@DBLP:journals/corr/abs-1103-5708] that it is beneficial for agents to take actions that maximize the reduction in uncertainty about the environment dynamics. This can be formalized as taking a sequence of actions $a_t$ that maximize the sum of reductions in entropy. With the history of the agents up until time step $t$ as $\xi_{t} = \{s_1 , a_1 , \dots , s_t \}$, we can write the sum of entropy reductions as
$$\sum_{t} \left( H\left(\bold\mathbf{\Theta}| \xi_{t}, a_t \right) - H \left(\bold\mathbf{\Theta} | S_{t+1}, \xi_{t}, a_t \right) \right). \label{eq:1}$$
As indicated in [@DBLP:journals/corr/HouthooftCDSTA16], according to information theory, the individual terms express the mutual information between the next state distribution $S_{t+1}$ and the model parameter distribution $\bold\mathbf{\Theta}$, namely $I(S_{t+1}; \bold\mathbf{\Theta}|\xi_{t},a_{t})$. This implies that an agent is encouraged to take actions that are as informative as possible regarding the environment transition dynamics. This mutual information can be written as:
$$I \left (S_{t+1};\bold\mathbf{\Theta}|\xi_{t},a_{t} \right) = \mathbb{E}_{s_{t+1} \sim P \left(\cdot|\xi_{t},a_{t} \right)} [D_{KL}[p \left(\theta|\xi_{t},a_t,s_{t+1}\right) || p \left(\theta|\xi_{t} \right)]], \label{eq:2}$$
where the KL divergence term is expressing the difference between the new and the old beliefs of the agent regarding the environment dynamics, and the expectation is with respect to all possible next states according to the true dynamics. Under these assumptions the above formulation can also be interpreted as information gain [@DBLP:journals/corr/HouthooftCDSTA16].
Formally, since calculating the posterior $p(\theta|D)$ for a dataset $D$ is not feasible, we follow VIME and approximate it through an alternative distribution $q(\theta;\phi)$, parametrized by $\phi$. In this setting we seek to minimize $D_{KL}$ through maximization of the variational lower bound $L[q(\theta ; \phi),D]$. The latter is formulated as:
$$L[q(\theta ; \phi),D] = \mathbb{E}_{\theta \sim q(\cdot ; \phi)} [\log p(D|\theta)] - D_{KL}[q(\theta ; \phi) || p(\theta)]. \label{eq:3}$$
The information gain term can then can be expressed as:
$$I(S_{t+1}; \bold\mathbf{\Theta}|\xi_{t},a_{t}) = D_{KL} [q(\theta ; \phi_{t+1}) || q(\theta ; \phi)], \label{eq:4}$$
where $\phi_{t+1}$ represents the updated and $\phi_{t}$ the old parameters of the agent’s belief regarding the environment dynamics. Since Bayesian Neural Networks are expressive parameterized models that can maintain a distribution over their weights, they are excellent candidates for realizing reinforcement learning agents which can directly provide an estimate of the information gain via equation \[eq:4\].
In our setting we are interested in keeping a metric that captures how certain a given agent is about the environment dynamics after a fixed amount of exploration, as opposed to a metric that only favors exploration like in the original VIME paper [@DBLP:journals/corr/HouthooftCDSTA16]. The reason for this deviation is that we are on the one hand interested to explore the environment in order to learn a good policy early (similar to standard VIME), but on the other hand we want to be able to compare between the different reinforcement learning algorithms and architectures, using their “surprise” for a fixed amount of environment iterations as a metric. Therefore we consider a moving average over the normalized inverse formulation of the previous term for a specified number of environment interactions (since less “surprise” means better understanding of the environment, if the number of interactions is fixed).
Experiments
===========
In order to validate the idea of using a bandit framework on top of a collection of reinforcement learning agents, we use a number of well known environments that include some traditional reinforcement learning tasks (e.g., Acrobot, Cartpole), some basic locomotion tasks (e.g., Mountain Car, Lunar Lander), as well as some classic games such as KungFu, Ms. Pacman, Space Invaders, Zaxxon, Seaquest, and Atlantis from the Atari collection [@DBLP:journals/corr/BrockmanCPSSTZ16].
We analyze different types of bandit algorithms, each of which has to select among a set of different architectures of reinforcement learning agents: vanilla VIME for the simple locomotion tasks (with different sets of hyperparameters), and VIME combined with Deep Q-Network (DQN) or Asynchronous Actor-Critic Agents (A3C) for the Atari environments (again with several hyperparameter options, one captured in each agent). In addition, we also compare the results of the best agents in our framework with literature results of DQN agents from [@mnih-dqn-2015], as well as with the more recent massively parallelized form of the same framework, Gorila [@DBLP:journals/corr/NairSBAFMPSBPLM15].
Before analyzing the behaviour of bandits on top of reinforcement learning agents, we investigate single agents. The first step is to show that the surrogate reward (consisting of the true reward and the information gain) is promising for early selection of the reinforcement learning agents. In this direction we select the part of the reward that captures how well the agent is learning the environment dynamics, the information gain, and we plot it (rescaled) together with the true environment rewards (Figure \[fig:correlation\_check\]), for two different agents (one that is particularly good for the task, one that is able to solve it but is suboptimal). Both plots are the averages of 50 instantiations of the environment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
![*Correlation between environment and information gain rewards for a good (left) and a suboptimal agent (right) for Mountain Car environment.*[]{data-label="fig:correlation_check"}](mountaincar_correlation.png "fig:"){width="0.5\columnwidth"} ![*Correlation between environment and information gain rewards for a good (left) and a suboptimal agent (right) for Mountain Car environment.*[]{data-label="fig:correlation_check"}](mountaincar_correlation_badagent.png "fig:"){width="0.5\columnwidth"}
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is clear from Figure \[fig:correlation\_check\] that the true rewards of the environment (presented with green) and the information gain rewards (only the part that captures the certainty of the agent about the environment dynamics, presented with blue) are highly correlated, both for the good agent as well as for the suboptimal one. In addition, it is apparent that the information gain reward is both less sparse, taking informative values much earlier than the true reward (especially for the suboptimal agent) as well as smoother across the different instantiations of the environment. A good question then is why do we need the surrogate reward to be composed of two parts, one that captures the agent’s certainty about the environment and another that captures directly the true reward? This is necessary because later on the bandit will need to make increasingly more difficult decisions between agents that are all good and similar on their ability to model the environment and in this case capturing directly the true reward is necessary to differentiate between them.
The next step is to show that the surrogate reward allows focusing on the agents that are indeed the most promising ones in terms of their ability to collect reward early on, but also in terms of their ability to learn the environment dynamics so that collection of reward is also maximized in the long run. In order to show this property, we investigate the relation between the full surrogate reward and the true reward, especially for good agent architectures. Again we use the same setup as before, i.e. the graphs show results that are averages of 50 environment instantiations. In order to interpret the result one has to keep in mind that the surrogate reward is expressing a scaled version of the certainty of the agent about the environment dynamics (it is always increasing), while the raw environment rewards can be negative, either in the early stage of learning only or always. In all cases, the best agents are the ones that have the highest values on Figure \[fig:cart\_mc\_rewards\]. We can see that the three best agents in the figures with the doted lines (the surrogate rewards) are also the best ones in terms of the actual environment reward (solid lines) for both cases (note that for some environments highest is the largest positive value, and for some others it is the least negative one).
Having established that the surrogate reward is correlated with the environment reward and also has the desirable properties of being smoother and less sparse, we proceed to validate the core part of the bandit framework. Here we seek to answer the three questions: 1) how do the different bandits compare to each other, 2) whether a bandit framework is able to assign most of the actions on promising agents, as well as 3) if a bandit can select the best agent after a finite number of steps. For comparison we add an oracle that always selects the best agent, as well as a baseline that picks the worst agent.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
![*Frequency of selections of the different agents for Lunar Lander (left) and Mountain Car (right) at the end of training for the different bandit algorithms. The UCB algorithm matches the oracle (Best) in selecting the best agent after training is complete.*[]{data-label="fig:lunar_mc_bar"}](lunar_bar.png "fig:"){width="0.5\columnwidth"} ![*Frequency of selections of the different agents for Lunar Lander (left) and Mountain Car (right) at the end of training for the different bandit algorithms. The UCB algorithm matches the oracle (Best) in selecting the best agent after training is complete.*[]{data-label="fig:lunar_mc_bar"}](mc_bar2.png "fig:"){width="0.5\columnwidth"}
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The basic setup of the framework is that we define a window of iterations (typically 10 for locomotion environments and 20 for Atari) after which the bandit reviews the choice of reinforcement learning agent, and can select one out of several alternatives. The selected agent is then allowed to interact with the environment, collecting rewards in the process. The agents tested are vanilla VIME for the simple locomotion tasks (with different sets of hyperparameters taken from the literature as well as slight modifications with increased or decreased layer sizes, one more or one less layers, etc), and VIME combined with Deep Q-Network (DQN) or Asynchronous Actor-Critic Agents (A3C) for the Atari environments again based on literature or slightly modified variations. The bandits we are using for selection between the agents are Epsilon Greedy, Softmax, UCB1 and Exp3, while uniform, worst and best (oracle) are added as reference points.
First, let’s look at the selection behaviour of the bandits after learning. From Figure \[fig:lunar\_mc\_bar\] we can see that the UCB1 algorithm was able to pick the best agent architecture for all 200 instantiations of the environments , followed closely by Epsilon Greedy in the case of Mountain Car. However, for Lunar Lander the gap between the number of correct picks of the UCB1 algorithm and the next best one (SoftMax bandit in that case) is quite large. This performance gap can be reduced if we select better hyper parameters for the non-UCB algorithms, but that is not easy in real world settings, where a simulator of the environment is not available. A possible reason that algorithms such as SoftMax are not doing very well for Lunar Lander is the large number of different possible initial conditions of the game (different starting points of the space shuttle that has to be landed) which makes estimations of reliable expectations of the reward probability associated with each bandit action challenging. For Epsilon Greedy, although it does not calculate posterior probabilities, the large number of combinations makes random exploration less effective as well.
For Atari games (Space Invaders is shown as a representative example, Figure \[fig:space\_inv\_bar\]) one observation is that all bandit algorithms have a somewhat tougher job of selecting reliably the best agent. To some extent this is because two or more agents are typically close in terms of performance, but also because the variance of of the agent rewards over different instantiations of the environment can be significant, even for a well trained agent in some of these games. In fact it is not uncommon for one agent to have the potential for high reward, while another one achieves more reliably a certain level of lower, yet relatively good, reward. In such scenarios we might either select algorithms that best capture our preference with respect to the variance of the rewards or allow for a diversification strategy by keeping all the agents that are not strictly inferior to some other agent.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
![*Cumulative true reward for the Lunar Lander and Mountain Car environments (scaled).*[]{data-label="fig:lunar_mc_algos"}](lunar_algos.png "fig:"){width="0.46\columnwidth"} ![*Cumulative true reward for the Lunar Lander and Mountain Car environments (scaled).*[]{data-label="fig:lunar_mc_algos"}](mc_algos.png "fig:"){width="0.55\columnwidth"}
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The remaining question to be answered is whether the bandit framework is efficient in terms of collecting reward while learning. For this reason we will compare the cumulative rewards collected by the different bandit algorithms against 3 baselines: 1) a strategy of uniform alternation between the agents, 2) selecting the worst agent and stay with it, and 3) the oracle case of always selecting the best agent (Figures \[fig:lunar\_mc\_algos\] and \[fig:space\_inv\_algos\]). These 3 baselines will show us different extreme cases that are valuable for comparisons. The uniform strategy shows us if there is any benefit from the bandit at all, compared to the case of naively alternating between agents. The baseline of picking the worst bandit and staying with it shows if the alternation between agents is justified compared to exploring deeply the environment with a sub-optimal RL agent. In this approach we have to continue with an agent that does not map well to the problem but we do not waste any time in exploring other agents, so all the effort is focused. Unfortunately, in many interesting cases the worst agent fails completely to solve the problem at hand, therefore some exploration is necessary. Finally, the oracle also does not spend time exploring so it provides an estimation of the performance gap between the bandit framework and the ideal but unrealistic case.
Games DQN Score Gorila Score Human Pro Score Best Agent Score
---------------- ------------------- -------------- ----------------- ---------------------
Atlantis 85641 $\pm$ 17600 100069.16 29028 217810 $\pm$ 7256.4
Kung-Fu Master 23270 $\pm$ 5955 27543.33 22736 29860 $\pm$ 6793.1
Ms. Pacman 2311 $\pm$ 525 3233.50 15693 5708.0 $\pm$ 860.1
Seaquest 5286 $\pm$ 1310 13169.06 20182 17214 $\pm$ 2411.5
Space Invaders 1976 $\pm$ 893 1883.41 1652 3697.5 $\pm$ 2876.1
Zaxxon 4977 $\pm$ 1235 7129.33 9173 30610 $\pm$ 8169.0
\[tab:1\]
![*Frequency of selections of the different agents for SpaceInvaders at the end of the training period for the different bandit algorithms. In this setting the variance is high and no bandit algorithm can perfectly match the oracle (Best) in the specified number of rounds.*[]{data-label="fig:space_inv_bar"}](si_bar2.png){width="0.65\columnwidth"}
![*Cumulative true reward for the SpaceInvaders environment (scaled).*[]{data-label="fig:space_inv_algos"}](si_algos.png){width="0.55\columnwidth"}
In order to evaluate the reinforcement learning agent that was selected from the bandit framework in this setting we compare the results of that agent with DQN agents [@mnih-dqn-2015], as well as with the more recent massively parallelized form of the same framework, Gorila [@DBLP:journals/corr/NairSBAFMPSBPLM15]. For this comparison we selected 6 Atari games spanning the full range, from ones where the algorithms are much better than humans, to some for which human players are much better. The goal here is not to beat the state of the art achieved by some of the recent algorithms e.g. [@DBLP:journals/corr/NachumNXS17] but to show that the bandit framework is indeed competitive in this setting. In principle, combining the proposed approach with more recent algorithms than the standard A3C and running the training for a longer number of epochs can improve the results further. Nevertheless, the agent selected by the bandit (for Atari typically a version of A3C enhanced with VIME) does better than DQN and Gorila in all 6 Atari games and it either increases the difference when it already is better than the pro human player or it at least reduces the gap when it is not. However, the exact architecture is not always the same, as the optimal set of hyperparameters varies in the different games.
Conclusions
===========
We have introduced a bandit framework that offers a principled way of selecting between different reinforcement learning agent architectures while maximizing rewards during the learning process, by focusing the exploration on the most promising agents even early on. Furthermore, the proposed framework was shown to reliably select the best agent (in terms of future expected rewards) after a finite number of steps. In order to achieve these goals a composite surrogate reward was used in combination to the bandit, comprising both the true environment reward as well as a term inspired by VIME [@DBLP:journals/corr/HouthooftCDSTA16], that captures the certainty of the agents regarding the environment dynamics, for a given amount of environment interactions. Under this setting, UCB proved an effective and robust algorithm for selecting the best agent after a finite amount of training steps. Experimental results on several classic locomotion and computer game environments show that the bandit strategies outperform both a single non-optimal agent, as well as uniform alternation between the agents.
[^1]: This work was done while the author worked at Zalando Research, Charlottenstrasse 4, 10969 Berlin, Germany
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'This paper is an introduction to the eleven works of the special issue on *Quantum and Classical Frontiers of Noise*. The weather, and its butterfly effect, is the typical example that explain why many natural phenomena are, in fact, not predictable with certainty. Noise in classical or quantum phenomena, understood as the difference between the empirical output of an experiment and its statistical prediction, is a measure of such uncertainty. One of the great contributions of noise appeared in 1905 when Einstein showed how the noisy (Brownian) motion of a dust particle seen in a microscope provided uncontroversial evidences on the existence of the (unseen) atoms. The aim of this special issue is to provoke discussions on how noise can help us to better understand (the reality behind) classical and quantum theories, and the frontier between them.'
author:
- Xavier Oriols
title: Quantum and classical frontiers of noise
---
How much of our world is predictable with certainty? {#sec1}
====================================================
Albert Einstein, in the paper Physics and reality [@einstein], pointed out the possibility of living in a bizarre world without comprehensible explanations for natural phenomena. He wrote: *“The fact that \[the world\] is comprehensible is a miracle"*. Similarly, Eugene Wigner wrote: *“The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural science ....is a wonderful gift which we neither understand nor deserve"* [@wigner]. Both reflections were inspired by the previous work of the German philosopher Immanuel Kant who wrote the very same idea almost two centuries before: *“The eternal mystery of the world is its comprehensibility."*. Fortunately, it seems that we live in a comprehensible world. However, if our world is comprehensible, how much of it can we predict with certainty?
After the work of Isaac Newton in 1687, it was believed at that time that all motions in heaven and earth were predictable with certainty and, in fact, explainable with just three simple mathematical laws [@newton]. Kant was deeply impressed by Newton’s work and he wanted to understand its limitations. Kant divided scientific knowledge into three parts: appearance, reality and theory. Appearance is the content of our sensory experience of natural phenomena, i.e. the empirical outcome of an experiment. Reality is what lies behind all natural phenomena. A theory is a human model that tries to mirror both appearance and reality. A useful theory might predict the outcome of an experiment in a laboratory or the observation of a phenomenon in Nature. The predictions of a theory can be certain [@footnote1] or statistical [@footnote2]. Empiricists believe on experimental outcomes (what Kant called appearance) and refuses to speculate about a deeper reality. On the other hand, realists believe that good physical theories explain, or at least provide clues about, the reality of our comprehensible world.
As all human creations, there are successful and unsuccessful theories. When in 1864 James Clerk Maxwell conjectured that light was an electromagnetic vibration, it was believed that all waves had to vibrate in some medium. The medium in which light presumably travels was named *luminiferous ether*. During almost a century eminent scientists believed blindly on that concept. Nowadays, the *luminiferous ether* plays no role at all in modern physical theories [@herbert]. The atomicity of matter is an example of a very successful theory. It was introduced by the British chemist John Dalton in 1808 to explain why some chemical substances need to combine in some fixed ratios. During one century it was thought that atoms was a crazy idea. Marcelin Berthelot said *“who \[has\] ever seen a gas molecule or an atom?”*, expressing the disdain that many chemists felt for the unseen atoms, that were inaccessible to experiments [@herbert]. Even its defenders saw little hope of ever directly verifying the atomic hypothesis. Nowadays, the fact that everything is made of atoms is one of the most precious knowledge that we get on how Nature works [@feynmann], and their images are even routinely seen in the screens of scanning tunneling microscope apparatuses [@binning].
At this point, it is important to think about the possible relation between a theory and its predictions [@wiseman]. Surprisingly, a deterministic theory can provide statistical predictions of the outcomes, while a stochastic theory may provide predictions without uncertainty. We say that a natural phenomenon is predictable with certainty when, for a given initial preparation of the experiment, we can know from the theory if a particular outcome will occur or not, without ambiguity. We refer to a theory as a deterministic one when the specification of the complete [@footnote3] state of a system at one time, together with the laws of the theory, is compatible with only one state of the system at any other time.
In order to clarify the previous discussion, let us repeat an example found in one the papers of this special issue [@oldofredi]. We assume an ideal gas in a bottle governed by classical Newtonian mechanics. Although, according to the classical theory, the positions and velocities of all particles of the gas have well-defined values, it is impossible for us to know all the $10^{23}$ values. With the help of statistical mechanics, we can find which initial conditions are typical and which atypical and predict a statistical distribution of the total kinetic energy of the gas, but not its exact value at one particular time. The exact value of the kinetic energy of the gas, strictly speaking, cannot be predicted with certainty. It is very important to realize that the fact that the theory has well-defined values does not imply that we, the humans, know these values in an experiment.
There are other theories, for example the well-known orthodox (Copenhagen) quantum theory that are not deterministic. Even if the wave function has well-defined initial values, in general, the theory itself does not determine with certainty the occurrence or not of an (observed) outcome. According to the theory, most of the times that a measurement is done, a stochastic perturbation acts on the wave function. This is the so-called *collapse* of the wave function. Therefore, the results of such experiments cannot be predicted with certainty, and only statistical predictions are available.
The orthodox (Copenhagen) non-deterministic quantum theory can in fact predict with certainty some particular outcomes. According to the equations of motion of this theory, the state after a (projective) measurement is an eigenstate of the operator associated to the measurement. Therefore, after a second measurement (assumed to be done instantaneously after the first one to avoid unnecessary complications due to the evolution of the system) with the same (projective) measurement, we can predict with certainty that the outcome of the second measurement will be the same as the first one [@landau].
From the very beginning, the correct modeling of the measurement of quantum systems has been recognized as one of the the most puzzling and intriguing problems. It has direct implications on how quantum uncertainty is understood and on how the quantum-to-classical transition is explained. The so-called *measurement problem* [@bell; @herbert; @maudlin] appears because the use of a wave function governed by a linear dynamical equation of motion (like the unitary Schrödinger evolution) allows for several different outcomes (the Schrödinger’s cat, dead and alive, is the typical example). Then, if we assume that in our macroscopic world, when a measurement is done, only one outcome occurs (the cat alive or the cat dead, but not both), we have a problem because there is noting in the wave function for favor one or the other outcomes. One possible solution to the problem is arguing that we have one world where the cat is alive and another different world where the cat is dead. This is the many worlds interpretation discussed in the paper [@barret] of this special issue. Another solution to the measurement problem consist in assuming that there is only one world, but that the wave function alone does not provide a *complete* specification of the quantum state. For example, as done in the paper [@sole] of this special issue, we can add a trajectory for each particle of the quantum system. Bohmian mechanics is the theory behind such account. Finally, another solution is just arguing that the mentioned unitary Schrödinger-like evolution of the wave function is not always applicable, and that new quantum non-linear equations are required. This is dealt with in the papers [@ghirardi] and [@vacchini] of this special issue. The former is the GRW interpretation that complements the Schrödinger evolution with a new stochastic term in the equation of motion of the wave function, while the latter is the orthodox (Copenhagen) interpretation. This last explanation imposes that the Schrödinger equation has to be substituted by a new law, known as the collapse law [@landau], every time that a measurement is done. Certainly, in spite of being not free from controversies, this last option seems the most widely accepted solution to the measurement problem. An eminent physicist John S. Bell, which became well-known for his inequalities that have the implications that our world is non-local, however, in 1982 [@bell]: *“The concept of measurement becomes so fuzzy on reflection that it is quite surprising to have it appearing in physical theory at the most fundamental level."*.
I conclude this part providing an answer to the question posted in the title of this section: How much of our world is predictable with certainty? Accepting a coarse-grained computation of the possible outcomes, many macroscopic phenomena seem to be predictable with (a coarse-grained) certainty. On the contrary, we realize that most Natural phenomena, or outcomes in laboratories, cannot be predicted with absolute precision. Contrarily to Newton’s thoughts, we can compute the trajectory of (the center of mass of) Jupiter with great precision, but we cannot predict the exact size of its great red spot (a persistent anticyclonic storm at south of Jupiter’s equator).
Signal and noise {#sec2}
================
In this section, I provide an informal relation between uncertainty and noise. We have already mentioned several classical and quantum examples of experiments whose possible $N$ outcomes $a_1,a_2,a_3,...,a_N$ are not predictable with certainty. We have only access to the probability of the different outcomes $a_i$ defined through the function $P(a_i)$. From this statistical information, we can estimate the mean value: $$\begin{aligned}
\langle A \rangle= \sum_{i=1}^N P(a_i)a_i.\end{aligned}$$ The knowledge of $\langle A \rangle$ does not allow us to predict with certainty which outcome $a_i$ will occur in a given experiment. Nevertheless, we are sure that the outcomes in a set of identical experiments will satisfy $\langle A \rangle$ when properly averaged. The value $\langle A \rangle$ is a statistical prediction. It seems very reasonable to talk about $\langle A \rangle$ as the signal of our experiment. Once we have a precise definition of what is a signal, the meaning of the noise is just the difference between the measured (observed) outcome $a_i$ and the signal. Technically, since we have to average over $N$ possible outcomes, in order to avoid positive and negative cancellations of the difference, it is better to quantify the noise as: $$\begin{aligned}
\sigma^2=\sum_{i=1}^N (a_i-\langle A \rangle)^2 P(a_i),\end{aligned}$$ where $\sigma$ is the so-called standard deviation. For a set of identical experiments where the outputs are always $a_1$, the mean value is $\langle A \rangle=a_1$ and there is no noise, i.e. $\sigma=0$. Noise is, in this sense, a measure of the uncertainty of the classical or quantum experiments.
Noise can have many different origins. For example, a spurious distortion in the measurement apparatus between what it really measures on the system and what is indicated in the pointer. Other sources of noise can be attributed to our ignorance about the (microscopic) initial conditions of a complex system or to a fundamental stochastic element in the theory. Sometimes, we can reduce the noise of a particular phenomena by improving the technological tools that allows us to better determine the initial conditions of the experiment. Others, it is the theory itself that does not allow us to better predict the outcomes [@acin].
Noise in classical or quantum phenomena cannot be fully domesticated. It is not only a hindrance to signal detection, but it is indeed a valuable source of information (not present in the signal) that help us to get a deeper understanding on how Nature works. Perhaps, the first great contribution of noise into our understanding of Nature was the demonstration of the real existence of atoms [@cohen]. As mentioned in section \[sec1\], during the 19th century there were an intense debate about the reality of atoms [@herbert]. The success of thermodynamics convinced many scientist that atoms and molecules were imaginative fictions and that the real underlying component of the Universe was energy, in its various forms. In 1905, the same year that Einstein conceived the theory of relativity that demolished the *luminiferous ether*, he published a paper on Brownian motion that pointed the way to conclusive experiments bearing on the existence of atoms [@einstein2]. Whenever micron-sized particles are suspended in a liquid they undergo a perpetual quivering dance whose origin had been a mystery since its discovery in 1828 by the Scottish botanist Robert Brown [@brown]. Einstein showed that although the number of atoms striking the Brownian particle from each direction is equal on the average, the noise on the number of atoms (the fluctuations of this number with respect to the average value) leads to unbalanced forces in random directions. For a very large particle, the pressure of the surrounding atoms is indeed evenly balanced, but for a small particle, the fluctuations in the number of atoms impinging the particle is enough to propel it in an unpredictable direction with a predictable force, as indicated in the conclusions of the paper [@vacchini] of this special issue: Can discussions on noise allow a deeper understanding of the quantum reality?
The frontier between classical and quantum mechanics {#sec3}
====================================================
I started this paper by wondering about the comprehensibility of our world [@einstein; @wigner]. In any case, our comprehension of how Nature works is at the present time partitioned in several theories. Each theory describes reality in a different manner. We have been unable yet to develop a theory of everything, a final and grand unified theory. Classical mechanics provides good predictions with a (coarse-grained) certainty for macroscopic objects when particle velocities $v$ are much slower than the speed of light $c$. The classical theory visualizes the reality in terms of point-particles with well-defined trajectories. However, the theory completely fails for larger velocities or smaller lengths. For $v \approx c$, classical mechanics is substituted by relativity. The frontier between classical mechanics and relativity is well understood. The equations of motion of the theory of relativity depend on the ratio $v/c$ and in the limit $v/c \rightarrow 0$ the relativistic equations of motion become classical.
For small (microscopic) lengths, the classical theory has to be substituted by quantum ones. However, the quantum-to-classical frontier is still unclear, diffuse. It is widely assumed that the equations of motion of the quantum theories must lead to the classical ones in the *proper limits*. However, we have not yet a clear way to understand what *proper limits* means. Since the beginning of the quantum theory a century ago, the study of this frontier has been a constant topic of debate. The first attempts to reach classical dynamics from quantum mechanics revolved around simple assumptions like a Planck’s constant equal to zero [@landau], large quantum numbers [@bohr20], large mass [@angel], etc. All these arguments, in spite of being useful in some simple experiments, are clearly insufficient to get a clear and rigorous understanding of the quantum-to-classical transition [@Ballentine90; @Mako06; @klein12]. An evidence of the difficulties in understanding what the *proper limits* means is that, although most macroscopic objects behaves classically, macroscopic quantum superposition is still present in some systems and accessible experimentally [@oriol].
During last decades, decoherence has been invoked as an empirical explanation of the quantum-to-classical transitions [@camilleri]. However, one has to worry that decoherence cannot be invoked as a type of new postulate that forces quantum phenomena to become classical. On the contrary, decoherence should appear as a consequence of the postulates of the theory itself. For example, within the orthodox (Copenhagen) interpretation, decoherence has been defined for an open quantum system as a result of the entanglement between its degrees of freedom and those of the environment. Decoherence explains then why the reduced density matrix of an open system becomes diagonal, but many scientist argue that it still does not solve the quantum-to-classical transition satisfactorily because one has to invoke afterwards the intriguing collapse law to select only one element of the diagonal of the density matrix [@Zurek03; @Giulini96; @schlosshauer14]. Other interpretations of quantum phenomena, like the ones discussed in this special issue can shed light on the problem of decoherence from different points of view.
The fact that the quantum-to-classical transition is still so badly understood at a fundamental level is even more surprising because many of the new spectacular scientific and technological developments are nowadays playing in the nanotechnology arena. In spite of our difficulties in properly understanding this frontier, this new developments involve indeed this macroscopic-microscopic (quantum-to-classical) frontier.
Outlook of the present special issue
====================================
The aim of the eleven papers of this special issue is to highlight the power of noise (or uncertainty) as a useful practical and theoretical tool to better comprehend how Nature works. The papers, written by experts in philosophy, physics and engineering are grouped into three different subsections. Next, I introduce each subsection and briefly contextualize the different works.
Fundamental noise in quantum phenomena {#grup1}
--------------------------------------
As I mentioned, some sources of noise, for example those related to our ignorance of some details of the environment, are common in classical and quantum phenomena. However, quantum phenomena show an additional source of noise not present in classical ones. If we measure the same property in a set of quantum systems, all of them identically prepared, the measured values do not generally coincide. We can only predict the statistical distribution of such values. There is absolute uncertainty in most quantum experiments. The different ontological explanations of this source of noise are discussed in this section. The *measurement problem* mentioned in section \[sec1\] is very present here. Different interpretations (inspired by different solutions of the measurement problem) explain uncertainty assuming very different realities [@everett; @ghirardi; @bohm].\
The first paper **Typicality in Pure Wave Mechanics** was written by Jeffrey Barrett from the University of California in Irvine, United States [@barret]. It explains how a consistent interpretation of the quantum uncertainty can be conceived assuming that the wave function is a complete description of a quantum state and without the controversial collapse law. Such interpretation is known in the literature as the *Many worlds* interpretation. The origin of the *Many worlds* interpretation was the relative state formulation done by Hugh Everett [@everett]. Indicating that his theory was fully deterministic, Everett originally entitled his thesis “Wave Mechanics without probability”. Later, Everett’s work was further developed by Bryce DeWitt and co-workers [@witt] and renamed as many-worlds. The wave function, interpreted by Born as a mathematical entity that encapsulates all different probabilities in a unique world, is reinterpreted here in a quite different way. Every time that the wave function dictates different possible outputs, the world splits into different worlds. For example, in the famous Schrodinger’s cat, after the measurement of the state of the cat, the cat is alive in one world and dead in another. Each world is as *real* as the one where I am writing this introduction. The world where I am writing corresponds to one sequence of the possible outputs. The puzzle is to explain the standard quantum statistics when the theory is fully deterministic and every possible measurement outcome in fact occurs. In short, Everett’s goal was to show that the standard quantum probabilities would appear to be valid in a *typical* world.\
The second paper entitled **How does Quantum Uncertainty Emerge from Deterministic Bohmian Mechanics?** was written by Albert Solé from Universitat de Barcelona and Xavier Oriols from Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, both from Spain, Damiano Marian from Università di Pisa in Italy and Nino Zanghì from Università di Genova and the INFN sezione di Genova, Italy [@sole]. The paper explains another possible interpretation of quantum mechanics with deterministic laws and without the stochastic collapse law. This interpretation is usually named Bohmian mechanics in honour of David Bohm [@bohm] or de Broglie-Bohm theory to acknowledge also the initial work of Louis de Broglie [@Oriols; @ABM; @durr]. In this theory, the wave function is not a complete description of a quantum state and, apart from the wave function, the actual position of the particles of the system are required. The whole state of the system (wave and particles) evolves deterministically. Thus, the Bohmian state can be compared with the state in classical mechanics, which is given by the positions and momenta of all the particles, and which also evolves deterministically. However, in Bohmian mechanics the initial position cannot be measured without disturbing the wave function. Even worst, the initial wave function cannot be measured with an apparatus, it can only be prepared). Since we ignore the initial conditions of a system, the outcomes of a quantum experiment become uncertain for us even when using a deterministic theory as Bohmian mechanics.\
The third paper **Conceptual Difficulties of standard quantum mechanics and the role of noise in overcoming them** was written by GianCarlo Ghirardi from the University of Trieste and the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, in Trieste, Italy [@ghirardi1]. As I mentioned, the stochastic collapse law of the standard (orthodox) quantum mechanics is seen for some people as a suspicious/questionable way of solving the measurement problem. It does not explain when the measurement takes place (at the beginning of the experiment? at the end? when somebody -with a PhD- is looking at the system [@bell], ...). In a real experiment, what is the measured system and what is the measurement apparatus? One way of solving these ambiguities of the orthodox theory is by arguing that a collapse-like phenomena happens in our world in a *natural* way, without depending on the (human as observers) measurement. This theory, known as the GRW [@ghirardi] to acknowledge the authors Giancarlo Ghirardi, Alberto Rimini, and Tullio Weber, has the additional advantage that provides a trivial understanding on why our microscopic world satisfies a linear principle, while the macroscopic world does not. The equations of motion of the theory includes, apart from a Schrödinger-like linear evolution, an additional stochastic evolution (noise) that provides a *natural* collapse and accounts for quantum uncertainty.\
The last paper of this section is entitled **Quantum Noise from Reduced Dynamics** and it was written by Bassano Vacchini from Università degli Studi di Milano, in Italy [@vacchini]. Many scientists affirm that the solutions mentioned above to solve the measurement problem (and the underlying reality that these solutions postulates) are even more unsatisfactory than the collapse law itself. What is objectively true is that almost all important developments of quantum mechanics in the last century have been developed within the collapse law of the orthodox theory. In particular, in this paper a review of the widely used orthodox techniques to deal with open systems, interacting with the environment, is presented. Averaging over the environmental degrees of freedom leads to stochastic quantum equations for the subsystems. Such equations include the constraints arising from the statistical structure of quantum mechanics (the collapse law) and the uncertainties appearing due to the fact that the system is open (without a complete knowledge of the environment). Simple examples are used to didactically explain the dynamics of such open systems. As indicated in the conclusions of this paper [@vacchini], perhaps, a better understanding of the role of noise in some quantum phenomena will allow us to discern between different interpretations. One of the main goals of this special issue is motivating research towards this direction.
Differences of noise in classical and quantum phenomena {#grup2}
-------------------------------------------------------
The quantum or classical equations of motion are different. Therefore, there are quantum features of noise phenomena without classical counterpart. For example, among many others, the Leggett-Garg inequalities [@legget] show how a quantum measurement itself has strong implications on the noise. Bell’s inequalities [@belline] have been further developed to show how faster-than-light causation has also effects on quantum noise. Quantum and classical chaos become very close at the experimental side, but not in their theoretical description. In this section, some examples are discussed.\
The paper **Sequential measurement of displacement and conduction currents in electronic devices** was written by Guillermo Albareda from University of Barcelona in Spain, Fabio Lorenzo Traversa from University of California, San Diego in United States and Abdelilah Benali from Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona in Spain [@albareda]. It deals with the measurement of the electrical current in quantum devices at very high frequency. From the extension of the Ramo-Schockley-Pellegrini theorem to quantum devices, the authors define a positive-operator valued measure for the total (conduction plus displacement) electrical current. They have implemented the resulting measurement protocol into a quantum electron transport simulator and the computed results for a resonant tunneling diode depends greatly on the details of the implementation of the total current operator [@albareda2; @albareda3]. In this sense, the paper can be considered as a practical example of the difficulties of the measurement mentioned in the well-known Leggett-Garg inequalities [@legget].\
The paper **Origin of Shot Noise in Mesoscopic Cavities** was written by Massimo Macucci and Paolo Marconcini, from Università di Pisa in Italy [@macucci]. The paper studies the shot noise suppression in mesoscopic cavities. It starts by discussing the two origins of (classical or quantum) shot noise: the stochastic injection of electrons (because we are dealing with an open system) and its stochastic transmission (due to the quantum noise discussed in section \[grup1\] or to other classical sources of stochastic dynamics inside the structure). After reviewing the relevant literature, the authors present some numerical results to conclude that shot noise behaviour in mesoscopic cavities can be explained without any need for classical chaotic dynamics and only on the basis of quantum chaos resulting from diffraction at the constrictions. The paper does also suggest several reflections on the relation between classical and quantum chaos. Can a better understanding on the origin of chaos improve our understanding of the frontier between quantum and classical theories?\
The paper **From the universe to subsystems: Why quantum mechanics appears more stochastic than classical mechanics** was written by Andrea Oldofredi, Dustin Lazarovici and Michael Esfeld from Universite de Lausanne in Switzerland, and Dirk-Andre Deckert from Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, in Germany [@oldofredi]. This paper emphasizes through didactic examples that an equation of motion, without fixing the initial conditions, become useless for making exact predictions. What happens when the number of particles of an ideal gas in a box is so large ($10^{23}$) that it is impossible to determine the initial conditions of all the particles? In such systems, the concept of typical and atypical initial conditions become very relevant. A (coarse-grained) uniform distribution of particles is typical, while all particles concentrated together in a small region of the box is atypical. From the concept of typicality, we can easily move to the concept of probability for either classical or quantum phenomena. Boltzmann was the first to develop such strategy in classical mechanics. It is very relevant to emphasize that, as Einstein already noted, Boltzmann’s procedure to build probabilities in classical mechanics comes from outside of the equations of motion of the theory itself. By means of the examples of both classical and Bohmian mechanics, the authors explain what quantum and classical probabilities have in common and where exactly their differences lie.\
The paper **Randomness and non-locality** was written by Gabriel Ignacio Senno, Ariel Bendersky, and Santiago Figueira from Universidad de Buenos Aires in Argentina [@senno]. The paper deals with the relationship between uncertainty and non-locality. The authors provide a summary of recent advances in the interplay between these two important concepts from a quantum information point of view. According to the orthodox (standard) quantum theory, the collapse of the wave function is the fundamental source of uncertainty in the quantum regime. The important point here is that a wave function of $N$ particles *lives* in a configuration space of $3N$ dimensions (not in the three-dimensional physical space). Therefore, the stochastic perturbation of the wave function in the configuration space due to the collapse after a measurement, implies a faster-than-light interaction among particles. This effect, implicit in the Bell’s inequalities [@belline], implies a deep connection between quantum non-locality and quantum uncertainty.\
Noise in the quantum-to-classical frontier {#grup2}
------------------------------------------
Our everyday experience certifies that our macroscopic world follows, most of the time, classical laws, while the microscopic (atomistic) world follows quantum mechanical ones. Surprisingly, as discussed in section \[sec3\], the transition between both theories is not at all obvious. Discussions of some systems at this frontiers are presented below.\
The first paper **On the Classical Schrödinger equation** was written by Albert Benseny from Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University in Japan, David Tena and Xavier Oriols both from Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona in Spain [@benseny]. The paper discusses the classical Schrödinger equation. The authors emphasize how a (usually unnoticed) univaluedness condition on the Hamilton’s principal function is assumed during the transition from Newton mechanics to the classical Schrödinger equation. This additional assumption implies that the trajectories described by the classical Schrödinger equation do not cross in the configuration space, providing unexpected non-classical features. The authors also explain the strategy of reaching the classical wave function by departing from quantum Bohmian mechanics and invoking the quantum-to-classical transition when a large number of identical particles are invoked. Here, the center of mass plays the role of coarse-grained outcome mentioned along the introduction. The authors also show that a condition of dealing with a very sharp wave packet of the center of mass is mandatory, which implicitly avoids the non-classical features mentioned above. The paper is an example of the difficulties discussed in Section \[sec3\] in the quantum-to-classical transition: Why does the quantum wave function seems to become irrelevant in classical scenarios?\
The paper **Noise in quantum devices: A Unified Computational Approach For Different Scattering Mechanisms** was written by Damiano Marian from Universita di Pisa, Italy and Enrique Colomés from Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona in Spain [@marian]. From the point of view of simulation, an electronic device is an extraordinary complex system because it is a many-body open system out of (thermodynamic) equilibrium. The typical strategy to simulate such complex systems is to discern between the relevant processes that determine the global behavior of the device and those processes that have a smaller effect on the device. Then, we only model the equations of motion of the relevant processes and the other processes are just introduced later as perturbation. The author use the notion of conditional wave function, the wave function of a subsystem in Bohmian mechanics, to define an effective equation of motion for electrons in a subsystem. Then, through the use of different degrees of approximations, transport is modeled in a simple tunneling barrier as well as in a electronic system interacting with a bath of phonons [@marian2]. The paper also debates on the risk of making excellent mathematical approximations in the equations of motion, without any physical justification apart from fitting experimental results. In the literature, there are many models for electronic transport that allow a proper interpretation of classical and quantum devices and the transition between them (by properly fitting the parameters of the scattering rates included in the equation of motion). This has the risk of producing unfalsifiable theories [@camilleri; @oriols2].\
Finally, the paper **Zero Thermal Noise in resistors at zero temperatures** was written by Laszlo B Kish from Texas A&M University in United States, Gunnar A Niklasson and Claes-Goran Granqvist from Uppsala University in Sweden [@kish]. The paper points out interesting paradoxes that appears in typical electronic devices when analyzing noise at zero temperature. The fluctuation-dissipation theorem for the voltage and current present in a resistance shows that the noise can be modeled as the sum of a classical plus a quantum (zero point) term. The classical term vanishes when the temperature approaches zero, while the quantum term still predicts non-zero noise voltage and current at zero temperature. The authors discuss the paradoxes, possible theoretical flaws and experimental artifacts of getting noise at zero temperature in practical experimental situations and they point out a possible solution. They also insist that its resolution is essential to determine the real error rate and fundamental energy dissipation limits of the state-of-the-art logic gates. Can such paradoxes shed light on a better understanding of the quantum-to-classical transition?\
Final remarks
=============
The investigation of noise is important because it can reveal information on classical and quantum phenomena not available from mean values. Noise is not only a hindrance to signal detection, but it can help us to enlighten our understanding on how Nature works. Certainly, the investigation of noise is a more difficult task than the investigation of mean values, either from a experimental or theoretical point of view (in part because of the still puzzling quantum measurement problem).
Everyday our society is impressed by spectacular scientific and technological advances in nanotechnology. Let me mention few of them. We are now able to measure the trajectories of quantum particles (photons) through weak values [@photons]. With weak measurements, we have experimental control on how much distortion (i.e. how much *collapse*) is produced on the measured state [@weak]. We get macroscopic superpositions of quantum objects in laboratories [@oriol]. Quantum (analog) simulators allow us to create artificial atoms with artificial interactions [@cold]. In spite of such unquestionable control over quantum systems, many fundamental questions still remain unanswered. An improved comprehension of how this nano world works is very relevant, not only from a fundamental point of view, but also from a practical point of view to be able to exploit all the great (quantum engineering) possibilities that seems to be hidden “at the bottom”.
Inspired by one of first great contributions of noise in understanding the atomicity of matter through the noisy (Brownian) motion of a dust particle [@einstein2], the aim of this special issue, written by different experts ranging from philosophy to applied physics, is to point out that noise can be a useful tool to provide a better comprehension of the reality behind classical and quantum theories, and the frontier between them.
Acknowledgments {#acknowledgments .unnumbered}
===============
I sincerely thank all the authors of this special issue for enlightening discussions. This work has been partially supported by the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) and Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad through the Spanish Projects No. TEC2012-31330 and No. TEC2015-67462-C2-1-R and the Generalitat de Catalunya (2014 SGR-384). This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 696656.
[99]{}
A. Einstein, *Journal of the Franklin Institute* **221(3)** (1936) 349. E. Wigner, *Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics* **13** (1960) 1. I. Newton, *Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica* London (1687). The prediction is certain when the theory provides one value when forecasting what would happen in the outcome of an experiment (the definition assumes that the theory agrees with experiments) The prediction is statistical when the theory itself gives a list of values, each one with its probability, when explaining the possible value of the outcome in an experiment. When repeating the experiment many times, with identical preparation, the different values of the outcome satisfy the predicted probabilities. N. Herbert, *Quantum reality* Anchor Books, New York (1984). “If, in some cataclysm, all of scientific knowledge were to be destroyed, and only one sentence passed on to the next generations of creatures, what statement would contain the most information in the fewest words? I believe it is the atomic hypothesis (or the atomic fact, or whatever you wish to call it) that all things are made of atoms—little particles that move around in perpetual motion, attracting each other when they are a little distance apart, but repelling upon being squeezed into one another. In that one sentence, you will see, there is an enormous amount of information about the world, if just a little imagination and thinking are applied.” R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton and M. Sands, *Feynman Lectures on Physics*, Addison-Wesley, (1965). G. Binnig, H. Rohrer, C. Gerber, and E.Weibel, *Physical Review Letters* **49** (1982) 57. The meaning of complete specification of the state is defined by the theory itself. E. G. Cavalcanti and H. M. Wiseman *Found. Phys.* **42** (2012) 1329. L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifschitz, *Quantum Mechanics, Non-Relativistic Theory*, Butterworth–Heinemann, Boston (1981). C. Dhara, G. de la Torre, A. Acín, *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **112**, (2014) 100402. L. Cohen, *IEEE Signal Processing Magazine* **22(6)** (2005) 20. A. Einstein, *Annalen der Physik* **17** (1905) 132. R. Brown, *Philos. Mag.* **4** (1828) 161. N. Bohr, *Z. Phys.* **2**, (1920) 423. A.S. Sanz, S. Miret-Artés, *J. Phys. A* **41** (2008) 435303. L. Ballentine, *Quantum Mechanics*, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, (1990). See Chapter 14. A. J. Makowski, *Eur. J. Phys.* **27**, (2006) 1133. U. Klein, *Am. J. Phys.* **80(11)** (2012) 1009. K. Camilleri, *Studies in History of Modern Physics* **40** (2009) 290. W. H. Zurek, *Rev. Mod. Phys.* **75** (2003) 715. D. Giulini, E. Joos, C. Kiefer, J. Kumpsch, I. O. Stamatescu, and H.D. Zeh, *Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory*, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1996). M. Schlosshauer, *The quantum-to-classical transition and decoherence*, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (2007). O. Romero-Isart, *Phys. Rev. A* **84**, (2011) 052121. J. S. Bell, Foundations of Physics, **12**, (1982) 989. T. Maudlin, Topoi, **14**, (1995) 7. H. Everett, *Rev. Mod. Phys.* **29**, (1957) 454. Bryce Seligman DeWitt, *Physics Today*, **23(9)** (1970) 30. D. Bohm, *Phys. Rev.* **85**, (1952) 166. G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, and T. Weber, *Phys. Rev. D* **34**, (1986) 470. X. Oriols and J. Mompart (eds.), *Applied Bohmian Mechanics: From Nanoscale Systems to Cosmology*, Pan Stanford, Singapore (2012). A Benseny, G Albareda, A. S. Sanz, J Mompart, and X Oriols, Eur. Phys. J. D **68**, (2014) 286. D. Dürr, S. Goldstein, N. Zanghì, *Quantum Mechanics without Quantum Philosophy*, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2013). A. J. Leggett and Anupam Garg. *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **54** (1985) 857. J. S. Bell, *Physics* **1** (1964) 195. J. Barrett *Fluct. and Noise Lett.* **15**(3) (2016)1640009. A. Solé, X. Oriols, D. Marian and N.Zanghì *Fluct. and Noise Lett.* **15**(3) (2016) 1640010. G. Ghirardi *Fluct. and Noise Lett.* **15**(3) (2016)1640007. B. Vacchini *Fluct. and Noise Lett.* **15**(3) (2016) 1640003. G.Albareda, F. Lorenzo Traversa and A. Benali *Fluct. and Noise Lett.* **15**(3) (2016)1640004. G. Albareda, D. Marian, A Benali, S. Yaro, N. Zanghì, X. Oriols, *Journal of Computational Electronics* **12 (3)** (2013) 405. G. Albareda, F.L. Traversa, A. Benali, X. Oriols *Fluct. and Noise Lett.* **11 (03)** (2011) 1242008. M. Macucci and P. Marconcini *Fluct. and Noise Lett.* **15**(3) (2016) 1640006. A.Oldofredi, D. Lazarovici and M. Esfeld *Fluct. and Noise Lett.* **15**(3) (2016) 1640002. G. I. Senno, A. Bendersky, and S. Figueira *Fluct. and Noise Lett.* **15**(3) (2016) 1640005. A. Benseny, D. Tena and X. Oriols *Fluct. and Noise Lett.* **15**(3) (2016) xxxx. D.Marian, E. Colomés *Fluct. and Noise Lett.* **15**(3) (2016) xxxx. V. A. Sverdlov, X. Oriols, K.K. Likharev, *IEEE transactions on nanotechnology* **2(1)** (2003)59. L. B. Kish, G. A. Niklasson and C.-G. Granqvist *Fluct. and Noise Lett.* **15**(3) (2016) 1640011. X. Oriols *J. Phys. Conf. Ser.* **701** (2016) 12004. D. Marian, N. Zanghì, X. Oriols *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **116** (2016), 110404. A. Benseny, J. Baguda X. Oriols, and J. Mompart *Phys. Rev. A* **85** (2012) 053619. Kocis, S., et al, *Science* [**332**]{} (2011) 1170. F. L. Traversa, G. Albareda, M. Di Ventra, and X. Oriols *Phys. Rev. A* **87** (2013) 052124. G. Albareda, F.L. Traversa, A. Benali, X. Oriols *Fluct. and Noise Lett.* **11 (03)** (2011) 1242008.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'Autofocus is an important task for digital cameras, yet current approaches often exhibit poor performance. We propose a learning-based approach to this problem, and provide a realistic dataset of sufficient size for effective learning. Our dataset is labeled with per-pixel depths obtained from multi-view stereo, following [@GargICCV2019]. Using this dataset, we apply modern deep classification models and an ordinal regression loss to obtain an efficient learning-based autofocus technique. We demonstrate that our approach provides a significant improvement compared with previous learned and non-learned methods: our model reduces the mean absolute error by a factor of 3.6 over the best comparable baseline algorithm. Our dataset and code are publicly available.'
author:
- |
[Charles Herrmann]{}^1^ ^122^\
[Qiurui He]{}^2^ ^2^ ^1,2^\
[^1^Cornell Tech ^2^Google Research]{}\
[{cih, rsb, rdz}@cs.cornell.edu]{}\
title: Learning to Autofocus
---
Introduction
============
In a scene with variable depth, any camera lens with a finite-size aperture can only focus at one scene depth (the focus distance), and the rest of the scene will contain blur. This blur is difficult to remove via post-processing, and so selecting an appropriate focus distance is crucial for image quality.
There are two main, independent tasks that a camera must address when focusing. First, the camera must determine the salient region that should be in focus. The user may choose such a region explicitly, e.g., by tapping on the screen of a smartphone, or it may be detected automatically by, for example, a face detector. Second, given a salient region (which camera manufacturers often refer to as “autofocus points”) and one or more possibly out-of-focus observations, the camera must predict the most suitable focus distance for the lens that brings that particular region into focus. This second task is called *autofocus*.
Conventional autofocus algorithms generally fall into two major categories: contrast-based and phase-based methods. Contrast-based methods define a sharpness metric, and identify the ideal focus distance by maximizing the sharpness metric across a range of focus distances. Such methods are necessarily slow in practice, as they must make a large number of observations, each of which requires physical lens movement. In addition, they suffer from a few important weaknesses, which we discuss in Section \[sec:challenges\].
Modern phase-based methods leverage disparity from the dual-pixel sensors that are increasingly available on smartphones and DSLR cameras. These sensors are essentially two-view plenoptic cameras [@Ng2005] with left and right sub-images that receive light from the two halves of the aperture. These methods operate under the assumption that in-focus objects will produce similar left and right sub-images, whereas out-of-focus objects will produce sub-images with a displacement or disparity that is proportional to the degree of defocus. Naively, one could search for the focus distance that minimizes the left/right mismatch, like the contrast-based methods. Alternatively, some methods use calibration to model the relationship between disparity and depth, and make a prediction with just one input. However, accurate estimation of disparity between the dual-pixel sub-images is challenging due to the small effective baseline. Further, it is difficult to characterize the relationship between disparity and depth accurately due to optical effects that are hard to model, resulting in errors [@GargICCV2019].
In this paper, we introduce a novel learning-based approach to autofocus: a ConvNet that takes as input raw sensor data, optionally including the dual-pixel data, and predicts the ideal focus distance. Deep learning is well-suited to this task, as modern ConvNets are able to utilize subtle defocus clues (such as irregularly-shaped point spread functions) in the data that often mislead heuristic contrast-based autofocus methods. Unlike phase-based methods, a learned model can also directly estimate the position the lens should be moved to, instead of determining it from disparity using a hand-crafted model and calibration—a strategy which may be prone to errors.
In order to train and evaluate our network, we also introduce a large and realistic dataset captured using a smartphone camera and labeled with per-pixel depth computed using multi-view stereo. The dataset consists of *focal stacks*: a sequence of image patches of the same scene, varying only in focus distance. We will formulate the autofocus problem precisely in section \[sec:formulation\], but note that the output of autofocus is a focal index which specifies one of the patches in the focal stack. Both regular and dual-pixel raw image data are included, allowing evaluation of both contrast- and phase-based methods. Our dataset is larger than most previous efforts [@carvalho2018deep; @DeepDDF; @mir2015autofocus], and contains a wider range of realistic scenes. Notably, we include outdoors scenes (which are particularly difficult to capture with a depth sensor like Kinect) as well as scenes with different levels of illumination.
We show that our models achieve a significant improvement in accuracy on all versions of the autofocus problem, especially on challenging imagery. On our test set, the best baseline algorithm that takes one frame as input produces a mean absolute error of 11.3 (out of 49 possible focal indices). Our model with the same input has an error of 3.1, and thus reduces the mean absolute error by a factor of 3.6.
Related Work
============
There has been surprisingly little work in the computer vision community on autofocus algorithms. There are a number of non-learning techniques in the image processing literature [@Chan:ICIP17; @Yang:TIP18; @Yang:ICIP16; @Lee2008; @Lee2009], but the only learning approach [@mir2015autofocus] uses classical instead of deep learning.
A natural way to use computer vision techniques for autofocus would be to first compute metric depth. Within the vast body of literature on depth estimation, the most closely related work of course relies on focus.
Most monocular depth techniques that use focus take a complete focal stack as input and then estimate depth by scoring each focal slice according to some measure of sharpness [@horn1968focusing; @Nayar1994; @Tenenbaum1971]. Though acquiring a complete focal stack of a static scene with a static camera is onerous, these techniques can be made tractable by accounting for parallax [@Suwajanakorn2015]. More recently, deep learning-based methods [@DeepDDF] have yielded improved results with a full focal stack approach.
Instead of using a full focal stack, some early work attempted to use the focal cues in just one or two images to estimate depth at each pixel, by relating the apparent blur of the image to its disparity [@grossmann1987depth; @pentland1987new], though these techniques are necessarily limited in their accuracy compared to those with access to a complete focal stack. Both energy minimization [@Tang_2017_CVPR] and deep learning [@carvalho2018deep; @Srinivasan2018] have also been applied to single-image approaches for estimating depth from focus, with significantly improved accuracy. Similarly, much progress has been made in the more general problem of using learning for monocular depth estimation using depth cues besides focus [@eigen2014depth; @saxena2008make3d], including dual-pixel cues [@WadhwaSIGGRAPH2018; @GargICCV2019].
In this work, we address the related problem of autofocus by applying deep learning. A key aspect of the autofocus problem is that commodity focus modules require a single focus estimate to guide them, that may have a tenuous connection with predicted depth map due to hardware issues (see Section \[sec:challenges\]). Many algorithms predict non-metric depth maps, making the task harder, e.g., scale invariant monocular depth prediction [@eigen2014depth] or affine invariant depth prediction using dual-pixel data [@GargICCV2019]. Hence, instead of predicting a dense depth map, we directly predict a single estimate of focal depth that can be used to guide the focus module. This prediction is done end to end with deep learning.
Problem Formulation {#sec:formulation}
===================
In the natural formulation of the autofocus problem, the lens can move continuously, producing an infinite set of possible focus distances corresponding to different focal planes. We discretize the continuous lens positions into $n$ focus distances, and from each position we extract an image patch $I_k, k \in \{ 1, \ldots, n \}$ corresponding to the region of interest. We assume the location of the patch $I_k$ has been determined by a user or some external saliency algorithm, and so we consider this image patch to be “the image” and will refer to it as such throughout the paper. Further, the image can either contain the dual-pixel subimages as two channels or it can contain just the green channel based on the type of input being considered. We refer to the set of images obtained at different focus distances $\{ I_k \}$ as a *focal stack*, an individual image $I_k$ as a *focal slice*, and $k$ as the *focal index*. We assume each focal stack has exactly one focal index whose slice is in focus.
Standard autofocus algorithms can be naturally partitioned according to the number of focal slices they require as input. For example, contrast-based methods often require the entire focal stack (or a large subset), whereas phase-based or depth-from-defocus algorithms can estimate a focus distance given just a single focal slice. Motivated by the differences in input space among standard autofocus algorithms, we define three representative sub-problems (visualized in Figure \[fig:af-forms\]), which all try to predict the correct focal index but vary based primarily on their input.
**Focal Stack:** $$f: \{ I_k \mid k = 1, \ldots, n \} \mapsto k^*$$ This is the simplest formulation where the algorithm is given a completely observed focal stack. Algorithms for this type typically define a sharpness or contrast metric and pick the focal index which maximizes the chosen metric.
**Single Slice:** $$f: I_k \mapsto k^*, \,\, \forall k \in \{ 1, \ldots, n \}$$ This is the most challenging formulation, as the algorithm is given only a single, random focal slice, which can be thought of as the starting position of the lens. In this formulation, algorithms generally try to estimate blur size or use geometric cues to estimate a measure of depth that is then translated to a focal index.
**Multi-Step:** $$\begin{aligned}
f_1: I_{k_0} & \mapsto k_1 \nonumber \\
f_2: I_{k_0}, I_{k_1} & \mapsto k_2 \nonumber \\
& \ldots \nonumber \\
f_m: I_{k_0}, \ldots, I_{k_{m-1}} & \mapsto k_m\end{aligned}$$ where $k_0 \in \{ 1, \ldots, n \}$, and $m$ is a predetermined constant controlling the total number of steps. The multi-step problem is a mix between the previous two problems. The algorithm is given an initial focal index, acquires and analyzes the image at that focus distance, and then is permitted to move to an additional focal index of its choice, repeating the process at most $m$ times. This formulation approximates the online problem of moving the lens to the correct position with as few attempts as possible. This multi-step formulation resembles the “hybrid” autofocus algorithms that are often used by camera manufacturers, in which a coarse focus estimate is produced by some phase-based system (or a direct depth sensor if available) which is then refined by a contrast-based solution that uses a constrained and abbreviated focal stack as input.
Autofocus Challenges {#sec:challenges}
====================
We now describe the challenges in real cameras that make the autofocus problem hard in practice. With the thin-lens and paraxial approximations, the amount of defocus blur is specified by $$\label{eq:blur_size}
\frac{Lf}{1-f/g} \left ( \left | \frac{1}{g} - \frac{1}{Z} \right| \right )$$ where $L$ is the aperture size, $f$ the focal length, $Z$ the depth of a scene-point and $g$ the focus distance (Figure. \[fig:what\_is\_camera\_a\]). $g$ is related to the distance $g_o$ between the lens and the sensor by the thin-lens equation. This implies that if the depth $Z$ is known, one can focus, i.e, reduce the defocus blur to zero by choosing an appropriate $g$, which can be achieved by physically adjusting the distance between the lens and the sensor $g_o$. This suggests that recovering depth ($Z$) is sufficient to focus. Dual-pixel sensors can aid in the task of finding $Z$ as they produce two images, each of which sees a slightly different viewpoint of the scene (Figure \[fig:what\_is\_camera\_b\]). The disparity $d$ between these viewpoints [@GargICCV2019] is $$\label{eq:disparity}
d = \alpha\frac{Lf}{1-f/g} \left (\frac{1}{g} - \frac{1}{Z} \right )$$ where $\alpha$ is a constant of proportionality.
This theoretical model is often used in the academic pursuit of autofocus (or more often, depth-from-defocus) algorithms. However, the paraxial and thin lens approximations are significant simplifications of camera hardware design and of the physics of image formation. Here we detail some of the issues ignored by this model and existing approaches, and explain how they are of critical importance in the design of an effective, practical autofocus algorithm.
#### Unrealistic PSF Models.
One core assumption underlying contrast-based algorithms is that, as the subject being imaged moves further out of focus, the high-frequency image content corresponding to the subject is reduced. The assumption that in-focus content results in sharp edges while out-of-focus content results in blurry edges has only been shown to be true for Gaussian point spread functions (PSF) [@lindeberg1990scale; @yuille1986scaling]. However, this assumption can be broken by real-world PSFs, which may be disc- or hexagon-shaped with the goal of producing an aesthetically pleasing “bokeh”. Or they may be some irregular shape that defies characterization as a side effect of hardware and cost constraints of modern smartphone camera construction. In the case of a disc-shaped PSF, for example, an out-of-focus delta function may actually have *more* gradient energy than an in-focus delta function, especially when pixels are saturated (See Figure \[fig:psf\]).
#### Noise in Low Light Environments.
Images taken in dim environments often contain significant noise, a problem that is exacerbated by the small aperture sizes and small pixel pitch of consumer cameras [@Hasinoff2016]. Prior work in low-light imaging has noted that conventional autofocus algorithms systematically break in such conditions [@liba2019handheld]. This appears to be due to the gradient energy resulting from sensor noise randomly happening to exceed that of the actual structure in the image, which causes contrast-based autofocus algorithms (which seek to maximize contrast) to be misled. See Figure \[fig:noise\] for a visualization of this issue.
#### Focal Breathing.
A camera’s field of view depends on its focus distance, a phenomenon called focal breathing.[^1] This occurs because conventional cameras focus by changing the distance between the image plane and the lens, which induces a zoom-like effect as shown in Figure \[fig:focal\_breathing\]. This effect can be problematic for contrast-based autofocus algorithms, as edges and gradients can leave or enter the field of view of the camera over the course of a focal sweep, even when the camera and scene are stationary. While it is possible to calibrate for focal breathing by modeling it as a zoom and crop, applying such a calibration increases latency, may be inaccurate due to unknown radial distortion, and may introduce resampling artifacts that interfere with contrast-based metrics.
#### Hardware Support.
Nearly all smartphone cameras use voice coil motors (VCMs) to focus: the lens sits within a barrel, where it is attached to a coil spring and positioned near an electromagnet, and the electromagnet’s voltage is adjusted to move the camera along the 1D axis of the spring and barrel, thereby changing the focus distance of the camera. Though VCMs are inexpensive and ubiquitous, they pose a number of issues for the design of an autofocus or depth-from-defocus algorithm. 1) Most VCM autofocus modules are “open loop”: a voltage can be specified, but it is not possible to determine the actual metric focus distance that is then induced by this voltage. 2) Due to variation in temperature, the orientation of the lens relative to gravity, cross talk with other components (e.g., the coils and magnets in optical image stabilization (OIS) module), and simple wear-and-tear on the VCM’s spring, the mapping from a specified voltage to its resulting metric focus distance be grossly inaccurate. 3) The lens may move “off-axis” (perpendicular to the spring) during autofocus due to OIS, changing both the lens’s focus distance and its principal point.
Unknown and uncalibrated PSFs, noise, focal breathing, and the large uncertainty in how the VCM behaves make it difficult to manually engineer a reliable solution to the autofocus problem. This suggests a learning-based approach using a modern neural network.
Dataset
=======
Our data capture procedure generally follows the approach of [@GargICCV2019], with the main difference being that we capture and process focal stacks instead of individual in-focus captures. Specifically, we use the smartphone camera synchronization system of [@ansari2019wireless] to synchronize captures from five Google Pixel 3 devices arranged in a cross pattern (Figure \[subfig:rig\_hardware\]). We capture a static scene with all five cameras at 49 focal depths sampled uniformly in inverse depth space from 0.102 meters to 3.91 meters. We jointly estimate intrinsics and extrinsics of all cameras using structure from motion [@hartley2003multiple], and then compute depth (Figure \[subfig:rig\_depth\]) for each image using a modified form of the multi-view stereo pipeline of [@GargICCV2019]. We sample $128 \times 128$ patches with a stride of $40$ from the central camera capture yielding focal stacks of dimensions $128 \times 128 \times 49$. We then calculate the ground-truth index for each stack by taking the median of the corresponding stack in the associated depth maps and finding the focal index with the closest focus distance in inverse-depth space. The median is robust to errors in depth and a reasonable proxy for other sources of ground truth that might require more effort, e.g., manual annotation. We then filter these patches by the median confidence of the depth maps. Please see the supplemental material for more details.
Our dataset has 51 scenes, with 10 stacks per scene containing different compositions, for a total of 443,800 patches. These devices capture both RGB and dual-pixel data. Since autofocus is usually performed on raw sensor data (and not a demosaiced RGB image), we use only the raw dual-pixel data and their sum, which is equivalent to the raw green channel. To generate a train and test set, we randomly selected 5 scenes out of the 51 to be the test set; as such, our train set contains 460 focal stacks (387,000 patches) and our test set contains 50 (56,800 patches).
Our portable capture rig allows us to capture a semantically diverse dataset with focal stacks from both indoor and outdoor scenes using a consumer camera (Figure \[fig:rig\]), making the dataset one of the first of its kind. Compared to other datasets primarily intended for autofocus [@carvalho2018deep; @mir2015autofocus], our dataset is substantially larger, a key requirement for deep learning techniques. Our dataset is comparable in size to [@DeepDDF], which uses a Lytro for lightfield capture and a Kinect for metric depth. However, we have significantly more scenes (51 vs 12) and use a standard phone camera instead of a plenoptic camera. The latter has a lower resolution ($383\times 552$ for the Lytro used in [@DeepDDF] vs $1512 \times 2016$ for our dual-pixel data) and “focal stacks” generated by algorithmic refocusing do not exhibit issues such as focal breathing, hardware control, noise, PSFs, etc, which are present upon focusing a standard camera. These issues are some of the core challenges of autofocus, as described above in Section \[sec:challenges\].
Our Model
=========
We build our model upon the MobileNetV2 architecture [@sandler2018mobilenetv2], which has been designed to take as input a conventional 3-channel RGB image. In our use case, we need to represent a complete focal stack, which contains 49 images. We encode each slice of the focal stack as a separate channel, so the model can reason about each image in the focal stack. In our experiments where we give the model access to dual pixel data, each image in the focal stack is a 2-channel image where the channels correspond to the left and right dual-pixel images respectively. In our ablations where the model is deprived of dual-pixel data, each image in the focal stack is a 1-channel image that contains the sum of the left and right views (which is equivalent to the green channel of the raw RGB image). To accommodate this much “wider” number of channels in the input to our network, we increase the number of channels by 4 times the original amount (width multiplier of 4) to prevent a contraction in the number of channels between the input and the first layer. In practice, the network runs quickly: 32.5 ms on a flagship smartphone.
In the setup where the full focal stack is available as input, the model is given a $128 \times 128 \times 98$ tensor for dual-pixel data, and a $128 \times 128 \times 49$ tensor for traditional green-channel sensor data. In the task where only one focal slice is observable, we use one-hot encoding along the channel dimension as input: the input is a 98-channel tensor (or 49 for green-channel only input) where the channels that correspond to unobserved slices in the focal stack are all zeros. We use this same encoding in the first step of our multi-step model, but we add an additional one-hot encoding for each subsequent step of the model, thereby giving the model access to all previously-observed images in the focal stack. We train this network by taking a completed single-slice network and evaluate it on all possible focal stacks and input indices. We then feed a new network this one-hot encoding, so the new network sees the first input index and the prediction of the single-slice network.
We model autofocus as an ordinal regression problem: we treat each focal index as its own discrete distinct class, but we assume that there is an ordinal relationship between the class labels corresponding to each focal index (e.g., index 6 is closer to index 7 than it is to index 15). The output of all versions of our network is 49 logits. We train our model by minimizing the ordinal regression loss of [@diaz2019soft], which is similar to the cross-entropy used by traditional logistic regression against unordered labels, but where instead of calculating cross-entropy with respect to a Kronecker delta function representing the ground-truth label, that delta function is convolved with a Laplacian distribution. This encourages the model to make predictions that are as close as possible to the ground-truth, while using traditional cross-entropy would incorrectly model any prediction other than the ground-truth (even those immediately adjacent) as being equally costly.
For training, we use Adam [@AdamICLR2015] with default parameters (initial lr $=1e-3$, beta1 $= 0.5$, beta2 $= 0.999$), with a batchsize of 128 and for 20k global steps. For the ordinal regression loss, we use L2 cost metric of [@diaz2019soft] with a coefficient of 1.
Results
=======
[![Qualitative results using Learned Depth$^\dagger$ [@GargICCV2019] and our model. Given a defocused dual-pixel patch , the baseline predicts out-of-focus slices ; our model predicts in-focus slices that are similar to the ground truth . []{data-label="fig:my_label"}](images/pd1/pd_inputleft.png "fig:"){width="9.00000%"}\[subfig:qual\_input\_left\] ![Qualitative results using Learned Depth$^\dagger$ [@GargICCV2019] and our model. Given a defocused dual-pixel patch , the baseline predicts out-of-focus slices ; our model predicts in-focus slices that are similar to the ground truth . []{data-label="fig:my_label"}](images/pd1/pd_inputright.png "fig:"){width="9.00000%"}\[subfig:qual\_input\_right\]]{} [![Qualitative results using Learned Depth$^\dagger$ [@GargICCV2019] and our model. Given a defocused dual-pixel patch , the baseline predicts out-of-focus slices ; our model predicts in-focus slices that are similar to the ground truth . []{data-label="fig:my_label"}](images/pd1/pd_baselinepredict.png "fig:"){width="9.00000%"}\[subfig:qual\_output\_baseline\]]{} [![Qualitative results using Learned Depth$^\dagger$ [@GargICCV2019] and our model. Given a defocused dual-pixel patch , the baseline predicts out-of-focus slices ; our model predicts in-focus slices that are similar to the ground truth . []{data-label="fig:my_label"}](images/pd1/pd_modelpredict.png "fig:"){width="9.00000%"}\[subfig:qual\_output\]]{} [![Qualitative results using Learned Depth$^\dagger$ [@GargICCV2019] and our model. Given a defocused dual-pixel patch , the baseline predicts out-of-focus slices ; our model predicts in-focus slices that are similar to the ground truth . []{data-label="fig:my_label"}](images/pd1/pd_gt.png "fig:"){width="9.00000%"}\[subfig:qual\_gt\]]{}
We demonstrate that our approach is better than numerous baselines on several variants of the autofocus problem.
We use similar error metrics as the Middlebury stereo dataset [@scharstein2002taxonomy]: the fraction of patches whose predicted focal indices have an error of no more than 0, 1, 2, or 4, as well as the mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE). For the focal stack problem, all algorithms are run on all elements of the test set and aggregated. For the single-slice problem, an algorithm will be run on $I_k$ for all $k$. For the multi-step problem, each patch in the test set will be evaluated 49 different times, with different focal indices acting as the starting position.
We compare our model’s performance against a wide range of baselines. For the baselines labeled as , we take all $49$ images (, the sum of the two dual-pixel images) from the input focal stack, evaluate a sharpness metric for each image, and then take the top-scoring image as the predicted focal depth for the stack. This is basically contrast-based depth-from-defocus. We take the top performing techniques from a recent survey paper [@Pertuz2012].
The baselines labeled as use dual-pixel images as input. Instead of maximizing contrast, they instead attempt to identify which slice in the dual-pixel focal stack has the most similar-looking left and right sub-images, under the assumption that the two sub-images of an in-focus image are identical. Because there is little prior work on dual-pixel autofocus or depth-from-focus using the entire focus stack, we use classical techniques in stereo image-matching to produce a similarity metric between the left and right images that we maximize.
Finally, the baselines try to predict the in-focus index given only one dual-pixel image pair. These baselines compute a disparity between the left and right views. As these baselines lack the global knowledge of the entire focal stack, they require calibration mapping this disparity to focus distances in the physical world. This calibration is spatially-varying and typically less accurate in the periphery of the field-of-view [@WadhwaSIGGRAPH2018]. Two of the baselines based on prior work only work in the center 1.5x crop of the image. We evaluate these baselines only in the crop region. This only helps those baselines, as issues like focal breathing and irregular PSFs are worse at the periphery. Please see the supplemental material for a description of the baselines.
Performance
-----------
Table \[table:big\_table\] presents our model’s performance for the full-focal green (), full-focal dual pixel (), single-slice green (), and single-slice dual pixel () problems. Our model significantly out-performs other single-slice algorithms, with a RMSE of 3.11 compared to the closest baseline value of 11.351, and MAE of 2.235 compared to 7.176. In other words, baselines were wrong on average by 14.6% of the focal sweep, whereas our learned model was wrong by only 4.5%. We also demonstrate improved performance for the full-focal sweep problem, with a MAE of 1.60 compared to 2.06 of Mean Local Norm-Dist. Our model also outperforms the baselines in its category but performs about the same as our model; despite having better within-0, within-1, and within-2 scores, it has slightly lower MAE and MSQE. In a visual comparison, we observed that both of our full-focal models produced patches which were visually very similar to the ground truth and were rarely blatantly incorrect. This suggests that both and have enough information to make an accurate prediction; as such, the additional information in does not provide a significant advantage.
Multi-step
----------
Table \[table:multi-step\] presents the results for the multi-step problem. Two baselines were extended into multi-step algorithms by re-evaluating them on the results of the previous run’s output. Both improve substantially from the additional step. In particular, these algorithms are more accurate on indices with less defocus blur (indices close to the ground truth). The first step serves to move the algorithm from a high blur slice to a lower blur slice and the second step then fine-tunes. We see similar behavior from our model, which also improves substantially in the second step. We attribute this gain to the model solving the focus-blur ambiguity which we discuss more in Section \[sec:ambiguity\]. Our model improves but by a smaller amount than other techniques, likely because it already has high performance in the first step. It also gains much less information from the second slice than the model since there is no ambiguity to resolve.
Performance with Registration
-----------------------------
As stated in Section \[sec:challenges\], focal breathing can cause errors in contrast-based techniques. Here, we estimate the magnitude of this problem by registering the focal stack to compensate for focal breathing and then re-evaluating the algorithms on the registered focal stack.
Theoretically, the change in FoV due to focal breathing can be removed using a zoom-and-crop registration calibrated by the camera’s focal distance. However, in practice, this registration is far from perfect and can introduce artifacts into the scene. Additionally, any noise in the measurement of focal distance means that a calibration-based registration may be imperfect. To evaluate this approach, we tested two different registrations: a zoom-and-crop registration calibrated by reported focal distance, and a grid search over zoom-and-crop registration parameters to minimize the L2 difference between the images. We note that both of these techniques led to registrations that eliminated some but not all of the change in FOV.
Table \[table:register\] shows the performance of a model we trained and the best contrast techniques on the registered data. Most of the contrast algorithms improved when run on the registered focal stack, gaining approximately 0.1 MAE. This suggests that focal breathing affects their performance. In addition, our model trained and evaluated on registered data outperforms our model trained and evaluated on non-registered data.
Single-slice Focus-blur Ambiguity {#sec:ambiguity}
---------------------------------
\[fig:ambig\]
In the single-slice problem, an algorithm given only the green-channel faces a fundamental ambiguity: out-of-focus image content may be on either side of the in-focus plane, due to the absolute value in equation \[eq:blur\_size\]. On the other hand, the model with dual-pixel data can resolve this ambiguity since dual-pixel disparity is signed (Equation \[eq:disparity\]). This can be seen from I1 vs D1 results in Table \[table:multi-step\] where I1 single step results are significantly worse than single step D1 results, but the difference narrows down for the two step case where the ambiguity can be resolved by looking at two slices.
The ambiguity is also visualized in Figure \[subfig:logits\] for a particular patch where the model outputs a bimodal distribution while the model’s output probability is unimodal. Interestingly, this ambiguity is only problematic for focal-slices where both the candidate indices are plausible, i.e., lie between 0 and 49, as shown in Figure \[subfig:mirror\].
Baseline Algorithms
===================
Here we document the algorithms taken from prior work that we use as baselines for our proposed model.
Contrast-Based Baseline Algorithms
----------------------------------
As a point of comparison for our proposed model, we implemented a number of contrast-based autofocus algorithms (or equivalently, patch-based depth-from-defocus algorithms) and evaluated them as baselines on our task. When selecting what baselines to implement, we prioritized top-performing techniques according to a relatively recent survey paper [@Pertuz2012]. Given a focal stack of images $\{ I \}$ we compute a contrast score ${\phi}$ for each $I$, and we return the index into the focal stack that maximizes ${\phi}$.
#### Intensity Variance [@krotkov1988]:
The variance of the intensity values of the entire image. $${\phi}= \operatorname{Var}(I)$$
#### Intensity Coefficient of Variation [@krotkov1988]:
The coefficient of variation of the intensity values of the entire image, which is the standard deviation of the intensity values divided by their mean. Similar metrics are sometimes referred to in past work as “normalized variance”. $${\phi}= \frac{\sqrt{\operatorname{Var}(I)}}{\mu(I)}$$
#### Total Variation (L1) [@Nanda01; @rudin1992]:
The total absolute difference between the intensity value of all pixels and their (4-connected) neighbors: $${\phi}= \sum_{x, y} \left|I[x, y] - I[x+1, y]\right| + \left|I[x, y] - I[x, y+1]\right|$$
#### Total Variation (L2) [@rudin1992]:
The total squared difference between the intensity value of all pixels and their (4-connected) neighbors. This is sometimes referred to as “gradient energy”: $${\phi}= \sum_{x, y} \left(I[x, y] - I[x+1, y] \right)^2 + \left( I[x, y] - I[x, y+1] \right)^2$$
#### Energy of Laplacian [@Subbarao1993]:
The image is convolved by a discrete Laplace operator, and the response are squared and summed. $${\phi}= \sum_{x, y} \Delta[x, y]^2, \quad \Delta = I * \begin{bmatrix}0 & \phantom{-}1 & 0\\1 & -4 & 1\\0 & \phantom{-}1 & 0\end{bmatrix}$$
#### Laplacian Variance [@PechPacheco2000]:
The image is convolved by a discrete Laplace operator, and the global variance of the response is computed. $${\phi}= \operatorname{Var}(\Delta[x, y]), \quad \Delta = I * \begin{bmatrix}0 & \phantom{-}1 & 0\\1 & -4 & 1\\0 & \phantom{-}1 &0\end{bmatrix}$$
#### Sum of Modified Laplacian [@Nayar1994]:
The image is convolved by a 1D discrete Laplace operator in x and y, and the absolute values of each filter response are summed. $$\begin{gathered}
{\phi}= \sum_{x, y} \Delta[x, y], \quad \Delta = \left| I * L_x \right| + \left| I * L_y \right| \nonumber \\
L_x = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & \phantom{-}0 & 0 \\ 1 & -2 & -1 \\ 0 & \phantom{-}0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}, \quad L_y = L_x^\mathrm{T}\end{gathered}$$
#### Diagonal Laplacian [@Thelen2009]:
This is the same as the “sum of modified Laplacian” approach, but augmented with diagonal Laplacian filters as well. $$\begin{gathered}
{\phi}= \sum_{x, y} \Delta[x, y] \nonumber \\
\Delta = \left| I * L_x \right| + \left| I * L_y \right| + \left| I * L_{xy} \right| + \left| I * L_{yx} \right| \nonumber \\
L_{xy} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{bmatrix} 0 & \phantom{-}0 & 1 \\ 0 & -2 & 0 \\ 1 & \phantom{-}0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}, \quad L_{yx} = L_{xy}^\mathrm{T}\end{gathered}$$
#### Mean Gradient Magnitude [@Tenenbaum1971]:
The mean gradient magnitude, where the gradient is computed using the norm of the response of Sobel filters. This is sometimes referred to as “Tenengrad”. $$\begin{gathered}
{\phi}= \frac{1}{n} \sum_{x, y} \sqrt{\nabla_x[x, y]^2 + \nabla_y[x, y]^2} \\
\nabla_x = I * \begin{bmatrix}-1&0&+1\\-2&0&+2\\-1&0&+1\end{bmatrix}, \,\, \nabla_y = I * \begin{bmatrix}-1&-2&-1\\\phantom{-}0 & \phantom{-}0 & \phantom{-}0\\+1&+2&+1\end{bmatrix} \nonumber\end{gathered}$$
#### Gradient Count [@krotkov1988]:
The total number of edges in the image whose magnitude is above some threshold $t$, where the gradient magnitude is again computed using Sobel filters. $$\begin{aligned}
{\phi}= \frac{1}{n} \sum_{x, y} \left[ \left| \nabla_x[x, y] \right| > t \right] + \left[ \left| \nabla_y[x, y] \right| > t \right]\end{aligned}$$
#### Gradient Magnitude Variance [@PechPacheco2000]:
The global variance of gradient magnitudes, where gradients are again computed using Sobel filters. $$\begin{aligned}
{\phi}= \operatorname{Var}\left(\sqrt{\nabla_x[x, y]^2 + \nabla_y[x, y]^2} \right)\end{aligned}$$
#### Percentile Range:
The difference between the $100-p$’th percentile and the $p$’th percentile of intensity values in the image. When $p=0$, this is the difference between the maximum and minimum pixel intensities in the image. $${\phi}= \operatorname{percentile}(I, 100 - p) - \operatorname{percentile}(I, p)$$
#### Histogram Entropy [@krotkov1988]:
The Shannon entropy of all pixel intensities in the image. $$\begin{aligned}
{\phi}= -\sum_i \mathbf{n}_i \log(\mathbf{n}_i),\quad \mathbf{n} = \operatorname{hist}(I)\end{aligned}$$
#### DCT Energy Ratio [@shen2006]:
The squared sum of all DCT coefficients of the image without the DC component, divided by the squared DC component. $$\resizebox{0.95\linewidth}{!}{$
{\phi}= \frac{\left(\sum_{u, v} D[u, v]^2 \right) - D[0,0]^2}{D[0,0]^2}, \quad D = \operatorname{DCT}(I)
$}$$
#### DCT Reduced Energy Ratio [@Lee2009]:
The squared sum of the 5 lowest order DCT coefficients (excluding the DC component) divided by the squared DC component. $$\begin{aligned}
{\phi}= \frac{D[0,1]^2 + D[1,0]^2 + D[0,2]^2 + D[1,1]^2 + D[2,0]^2}{D[0,0]^2}\end{aligned}$$
#### Modified DCT [@Lee2008]:
The total filter response of the image convolved with a checkerboard-like filter, which is somewhat related to the DCT of the image. $$\begin{aligned}
{\phi}= \sum_{x, y} \left( I * \begin{bmatrix} +1 & +1 & -1 & -1 \\ +1 & +1 & -1 & -1 \\ -1 & -1 & +1 & +1 \\ -1 & -1 & +1 & +1 \end{bmatrix} \right)[x, y]\end{aligned}$$
#### Wavelet Sum [@Yang2003]:
The sum of the absolute value of the high-frequency components of level $\ell$ of the wavelet decomposition of the image. In our experiments, we use CDF9/7 wavelets [@cohen1992biorthogonal]. $$\begin{aligned}
{\phi}&= \sum_{x, y} \left| W_{LH}^{(\ell)}[x, y] \right| + \left| W_{HL}^{(\ell)}[x, y] \right| + \left| W_{HH}^{(\ell)}[x, y] \right| \nonumber \\
&\left(W_{LL}^{(\ell)}, W_{LH}^{(\ell)}, W_{HL}^{(\ell)}, W_{HH}^{(\ell)} \right) = \operatorname{CDF9/7}(I, \ell)\end{aligned}$$
#### Wavelet Variance [@Yang2003]:
The variance of the high-frequency components of level $\ell$ of the wavelet decomposition of the image. $$\resizebox{0.95\linewidth}{!}{$
{\phi}= \operatorname{Var}\left(W_{LH}^{(\ell)}[x, y]\right) +
\operatorname{Var}\left(W_{HL}^{(\ell)}[x, y] \right) +
\operatorname{Var}\left(W_{HH}^{(\ell)}[x, y]\right)
$}$$
#### Wavelet Ratio [@Xie2006]:
The ratio of the squared norm of the high-frequency components of level $\ell$ of the wavelet decomposition of the image to the squared norm of the low-frequency components. $${\phi}= \frac{\sum_{x, y} W_{LH}^{(\ell)}[x, y]^2 + W_{HL}^{(\ell)}[x, y]^2 + W_{HH}^{(\ell)}[x, y]^2}{\sum_{x, y} W_{LL}^{(\ell)}[x, y]^2}$$
#### Mean Wavelet Log-Ratio
: This is a baseline of our own design in which we modify the “Wavelet Ratio” model to compute a local log-ratio between the high-frequency and low-frequency energy at each spatial location in one level of a wavelet decomposition, and then compute the mean of those log-ratios. We add $1$ to the denominator to prevent numerical issues. $$\resizebox{0.99\linewidth}{!}{$
\displaystyle {\phi}= \frac{1}{n} \sum_{x, y} \log \left( \frac{W_{LH}^{(\ell)}[x, y]^2 + W_{HL}^{(\ell)}[x, y]^2 + W_{HH}^{(\ell)}[x, y]^2}{W_{LL}^{(\ell)}[x, y]^2 + 1} \right)
$
}$$
#### Eigenvalue Trace [@Wee2007]:
The image is reduced to a matrix where each column is a vector containing the intensity values of each non-overlapping patch (here, of size $4 \times 4$) in the image. The trace of the sample covariance of that matrix is then used as a measure of sharpness. $${\phi}= \operatorname{trace}(\operatorname{cov}(\operatorname{im2col}(I, 4)))$$
#### Mean Local Ratio [@Helmli2001]:
A local measure of contrast is computed at each pixel by considering the ratio of each pixel intensity to a local average, and the overall contrast is computed as the average of those ratios (rectified if they are below $1$) across the image. The numerator and denominator of each ratio are incremented by $1$ to avoid numerical issues. $$\resizebox{0.99\linewidth}{!}{$
\displaystyle {\phi}= \frac{1}{n} \sum_{x, y} \operatorname{max} \left( \frac{\operatorname{blur}(I, \sigma)[x, y] + 1}{I[x,y] + 1}, \frac{I[x,y] + 1}{\operatorname{blur}(I, \sigma)[x, y] + 1} \right)
$
}$$ Where $\operatorname{blur}(I, \sigma)$ applies a Gaussian blur of standard deviation $\sigma$ to image $I$.
#### Mean Local Log-Ratio:
This is a baseline of our own design in which we modify the “Mean Local Ratio” technique above, by using the geometric mean of ratios instead of the arithmetic mean. $${\phi}= \exp \left( \frac{1}{n} \sum_{x, y} \left| \log \left( \frac{I[x,y] + 1}{\operatorname{blur}(I, \sigma)[x, y] + 1 } \right) \right| \right)$$
#### Mean Local Norm-Dist-Sq:
This is another baseline of our own design, in which we modify the “Mean Local Ratio” technique to use normalized squared distance (similar to a Coefficient of Variation) instead of ratios, which improves performance. $${\phi}= \frac{1}{n} \sum_{x, y} \frac{ (I[x,y] - \operatorname{blur}(I, \sigma)[x, y])^2 }{\operatorname{blur}(I, \sigma)[x, y]^2 + 1 }$$
Dual-Pixel / Stereo Baseline Algorithms
---------------------------------------
Because our images are taken from a dual pixel (DP) sensor, our focal stack can be thought of as a stack of left and right images in a stereo pair $\{(L, R)\}$. When a patch is in focus, the left and right DP images should resemble each other. It is therefore possible to construct simple autofocus algorithms by taking each left/right image pair $(L, R)$ in a DP focal stack, compute some measure of mismatch between those two images ${f}$, and return the focal index that minimizes that loss. In this section, we describe the baseline algorithms we use for this approach. Because patches of the the left and right DP images may have drastically different global brightnesses due to lens shading (especially when the patches are taken from the periphery of the entire image frame), these stereo-like algorithms must be invariant to global transformations of the input images. For this reason, we center each image by its mean and divide by its standard deviation before computing all stereo measures: $${\hat {L}} = \frac{L - \mu(L)}{\operatorname{Var}(L)}, \quad {\hat {R}} = \frac{R - \mu(R)}{\operatorname{Var}(R)}
\label{eq:zero_normalize}$$ This has no effect on some models (such as census and rank transformations) but is critical for other models.
#### Census Transform (Hamming) [@zabih1994]:
We apply the census transformation to the left and right DP images, wherein each pixel is represented by an 8-length binary vector representing whether or not the pixel is greater than each of its 8 neighbors. We score each pair according to the total Hamming distance between the two census-transformed images. $$\begin{gathered}
{f}= \sum_{x, y} \norm{ \operatorname{census}(L)[x,y] - \operatorname{census}(R)[x,y] }_0 \nonumber \\
\operatorname{census}(I)[x,y] = \bigg[ I[x + \Delta_x,y + \Delta_y] > I[x,y] \nonumber \\
\big|\, \Delta_x \in [-1, 0, 1], \Delta_y \in [-1, 0, 1], \Delta_x \neq \Delta_y \neq 0 \bigg] \end{gathered}$$
#### Rank Transform (L1) [@zabih1994]:
We apply the rank transformation (the $0$-norm of the census transformation) to the left and right DP images, and score each pair according to the L1 distance between the two rank-transformed images. $$\begin{gathered}
{f}= \sum_{x, y} \norm{ \operatorname{rank}(L)[x,y] - \operatorname{rank}(R)[x,y] }_1 \\
\operatorname{rank}(I)[x,y] = \norm{\operatorname{census}(I)[x,y]}_0\end{gathered}$$
#### Ternary Census [@stein2004efficient]:
We apply the ternary census transformation to the left and right DP images, wherein each pixel is represented by an 8-length ternary vector representing if the pixel is greater than, less than, or close to (according to some threshold $\epsilon$) each of its 8 neighbors. We then score each pair according to the total L1 distance between the two census-transformed images. $$\begin{gathered}
{f}= \sum_{x, y} \norm{ \operatorname{census^3}(L)[x,y] - \operatorname{census^3}(R)[x,y] }_1 \nonumber \\
\operatorname{census^3}(I)[x,y] = \bigg[ \operatorname {tsgn} \left( I[x + \Delta_x,y + \Delta_y] - I[x,y] \right) \nonumber \\
\big|\, \Delta_x \in [-1, 0, 1], \Delta_y \in [-1, 0, 1], \Delta_x \neq \Delta_y \neq 0 \bigg] \nonumber \\
\operatorname{tsng}(x, \epsilon) = \operatorname {sgn}(x) \left[ \left| x \right| > \epsilon \right] \end{gathered}$$
#### Normalized Cross-Correlation [@Barnea1972ACO; @Hannah1974]:
NCC is just the inner product of these two normalized images, with its sign flipped such that minimization results in maximum cross-correlation. This is equivalent to minimizing the normalized sum of squared distances between the two images. $${f}= -\left\langle \hat{L}, \hat{R} \right\rangle$$
#### Normalized SAD [@Hannah1974]:
The sum of absolute deviations between the two normalized images. $${f}= \sum_{x, y} \left| \hat{L}[x, y] - \hat{R}[x, y] \right|$$
#### Normalized Envelope (L1) [@birchfield1998]:
Pixel matching techniques can be made invariant to the discrete sampling of the sensor by adapting them to operate on smooth upper and lower envelopes of image intensities. Here we compute an upper and lower envelope of the left and right images, and from them compute the total L1 distance between the extents of the left and right envelopes. $$\begin{aligned}
{f}= \textstyle \sum_{x, y} \displaystyle & \left| \max\left(0, \hat{L}_\mathrm{lo}[x,y] - \hat{R}_\mathrm{hi}[x,y]\right) \right| \\
+ & \left| \max\left(0, \hat{R}_\mathrm{lo}[x,y] - \hat{L}_\mathrm{hi}[x,y]\right) \right| \nonumber \\
\hat{L}_\mathrm{lo} = \mathrm{min2} &\left(\mathrm{blur2}\left(\hat L\right)\right), \quad L_\mathrm{hi} = \mathrm{max2}\left(\mathrm{blur2}\left(\hat L\right)\right) \nonumber\end{aligned}$$ where $\mathrm{max2}(\cdot)$ is a $2 \times 2$ “max” filter (i.e. max pooling), $\mathrm{min2}(\cdot)$ is a $2 \times 2$ “min” filter (i.e. min pooling), and $\mathrm{blur2}(\cdot)$ is a $2 \times 2$ box filter (i.e. average pooling). $R_\mathrm{lo}$ and $\hat{R}_\mathrm{hi}$ are defined similarly.
#### Normalized Envelope (L2) [@birchfield1998]:
Similarly, we can compute the total squared distance between the extents of the left and right envelopes. $$\begin{aligned}
{f}= \textstyle \sum_{x, y} \displaystyle & \max\left(0, \hat{L}_\mathrm{lo}[x,y] - \hat{R}_\mathrm{hi}[x,y]\right)^2 \nonumber \\
+ & \max\left(0, \hat{R}_\mathrm{lo}[x,y] - \hat{L}_\mathrm{hi}[x,y]\right)^2\end{aligned}$$
Single-Slice Baseline Algorithms
--------------------------------
The baseline methods above infer the in-focus index by either maximizing contrast ${\phi}$ (for contrast-based methods) or minimizing stereo mismatch ${f}$ (for dual-pixel methods). Hence, they all require the knowledge of the entire focal stack before making a prediction.
However, the DP algorithms can be extended to predict the in-focus index with just one input DP image pair, if we can establish the relationship between left/right disparity $d$ and ideal focus distance $z^*$. We list a few such algorithms below.
#### SSD Disparity:
We use the block matching approach of [@WadhwaSIGGRAPH2018] to estimate disparity. In order to convert the disparity of a patch to a focal depth, we fit a linear model that estimates focal depth from the median patch disparity. The linear model is robustly estimated from all training patches using RANSAC. This methods computes depth over $1.5\times$ reduced field of view and we report results only on patches contained within that field of view. A narrower field of view is not unfair to the baseline as PSF variations and focal breathing are worse near the periphery.
#### Learned Depth:
We use the neural network based approach of [@GargICCV2019] to predict depth from dual-pixel images. The model from [@GargICCV2019] predicts depth maps up to an unknown affine transform, which we estimate by solving a least squares problem that minimizes the $L2$ distance between the affine transformed depth map and the disparity from [@WadhwaSIGGRAPH2018] that are known to be linearly related. We use the same fitting described in SSD Disparity and restrict evaluation to the same $1.5\times$ reduced field of view.
#### ZNCC Disparity with Calibration:
We compute the zero-normalized cross correlation between the input DP image pair $(L, R)$ (using Equation \[eq:zero\_normalize\]) to get $(\hat{L}, \hat{R})$. Then, we compute disparity between $\hat{L}$ and $\hat{R}$ [@Barnea1972ACO; @Hannah1974] and apply a precomputed calibration to convert disparity to focal distance. Specifically, to compute disparity $d$, we do the following $$d = \operatorname*{argmax}_{\delta} \left\langle \hat{L}[x, y], \hat{R}[x + \delta, y] \right\rangle$$ for integer $\delta$ in a small range around zero. We then refine $d$ to get sub-pixel resolution by fitting a quadratic near the peak and finding its supremum.
Under paraxial and thin-lens approximations, and assuming constant aperture and focal length, signed disparity $d$ and ideal focus distance $z^*$ are related by an affine transform [@WadhwaSIGGRAPH2018]: $$d = C \left( \frac{1}{z} - \frac{1}{z^*} \right)
\label{eq:zncc_with_calibration}$$ where $C$ is a calibration constant and $z$ is the lens’s current focus distance.
The assumption that $C$ is a constant breaks down for real lenses as they do not satisfy the paraxial and thin-lens approximations. In fact, the value of $C$ varies significantly across the field of view, due to optical aberration, vignetting, changes in optical blur kernels, etc., as shown in [@WadhwaSIGGRAPH2018]. The camera device we use embeds a factory calibration table that specifies the measured $C$ values sparsely across the field of view. We obtain the value of $C$ for each input patch by bilinearly interpolating the low-resolution calibration table.
With the knowledge of disparity $d$, calibration coefficient $C$, and current focus distance $z$, we can easily solve for $z^*$ in Equation \[eq:zncc\_with\_calibration\].
Generalization to other phones
==============================
To show that our technique generalizes, we use the data captured in the paper to create a new test set using the “left” camera, which has a different calibration and PSF.
This left test set contains the same scenes as the test set in the original paper; however, the overall attributes of the set may be different. The “left” phone is positioned in front of the “center” phone by 1.1 cm (on the z-axis, it is +1.1cm closer to objects in the scene). In addition, the computed depth has an overall lower confidence than that of the center camera since fewer cameras see all the pixels captured by the left camera. This problem is particularly apparent on the left side of the capture. In addition, because we keep the same confidence threshold as used for the center camera, fewer patches will be generated. In general, it may be difficult to compare the raw numbers from the test set using the center camera and the test set using the left camera.
As shown in Table \[table:left\], all techniques report slightly lower numbers. This indicates that the “left” test-set may be more difficult than the “center” test-set due to the aforementioned changes. Despite this, our model still outperforms the baselines. Additionally, several simple techniques, like adding calibration data to the model or a brief fine-tuning stage for each camera, could be easily added to our approach and potentially lead to improved per-device performance.
For this run, ZNCC Disparity uses calibration for the “left” camera, and linear models to convert to focal depths for SSD Disparity and Learned Depth were estimated using the training data patches from the “left” camera.
Light and Dark Scenes
=====================
In Figure 8 in the main paper, we presented examples on particularly dark images. In Table \[fig:lightdark\], we present the full numeric breakdowns of the performance of single-index algorithms on scenes with a normal amounts of light versus scenes with low light.
To capture these, we placed the rig in a fixed position and then captured two focal stacks: one with the light on and then one with the light turned off. As a result, these captures should be perfectly registered and should be the identical besides the presence or absence of light. We then used the ground truth depth from the light image to eliminate any possible mistakes that the SFM pipeline would have with the darker images.
Example Images
==============
Single slice as input
---------------------
In Figures \[fig:single1\], \[fig:single2\], \[fig:single3\], \[fig:single4\], we provide a random selection of inputs (among those inside the 1.5x crop center, so that the PD baselines are present) and the predictions from all baselines and our models. The “Input” is what the algorithm is given. The focal stack identification key is directly above the row. The title of each focal slice is: the name of the algorithm, the index, (“Err” followed by the number of indices away from the ground truth).
{width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"}
{width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"}
{width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"}
{width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"}
Focal stack as input
--------------------
In Figures \[fig:full1\], \[fig:full2\], \[fig:full3\], \[fig:full4\], we provide a random selection of inputs in the test set. The diagram contains an “Input” category; however, this is simply to display another element of the focal stack. All of these algorithms receive the full focal stack as input. The focal stack identification key is directly above the row. The title of each focal slice is: the name of the algorithm, the index, (“Err” followed by the number of indices away from the ground truth).
{width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"}
{width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"}
{width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"}
{width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"} {width="\linewidth"}
[^1]: Sometimes also referred to as focus breathing or lens breathing.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We present results of numerical simulations performed on one-dimensional spin chains in order to extract the so-called relaxation rate $1/T_1$ accessible through NMR experiments. Building on numerical tensor network methods using the *Matrix Product States* (MPS) formalism, we can follow the non-trivial crossover occurring in critical chains between the high-temperature diffusive classical regime and the low-temperature response described by the Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid (TLL) theory, for which analytical expressions are known. In order to compare analytics and numerics, we focus on a generic spin-$1/2$ XXZ chain which is a paradigm of gapless TLL, as well as a more realistic spin-$1$ anisotropic chain, modelling the DTN material, which can be either in a trivial gapped phase or in a TLL regime induced by an external magnetic field. Thus, by monitoring the finite temperature crossover, we provide quantitative limits on the range of validity of TLL theory, that will be useful when interpreting experiments on quasi one-dimensional materials.'
author:
- Maxime Dupont
- Sylvain Capponi
- Nicolas Laflorencie
title: 'Temperature dependence of the NMR relaxation rate $\mathbf{1/T_1}$ for quantum spin chains'
---
Introduction {#sec:intro}
============
One-dimensional ($1$d) quantum systems are known to be very peculiar due to strong quantum fluctuations that prohibit long-range order and can give rise to unusual phases of matter. In this context, it is remarkable that quantum spin chains fall generically into two classes regarding their low-energy properties [@Haldane1983; @Giamarchi]: (i) critical behavior where gapless low-energy excitations can be described in the framework of Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid (TLL) theory; (ii) gapped behavior.
Nevertheless, condensed-matter experiments are mostly done on *quasi*-$1$d materials, hence the role of small inter-chain couplings (as compared to the dominant 1d energy scale $J_{\rm 1d}$) may become important at low-enough temperature (eventually leading to magnetic ordering). Conversely, at high temperature ($T\gg J_{\rm 1d}$), quantum fluctuations vanish so that a classical picture emerges. As a consequence, for realistic experimental systems the validity of a universal $1$d TLL regime is not granted and should be checked in some unbiased way. In particular, understanding the intermediate temperature regime $T\sim J_{\rm 1d}$, highly relevant to understand several experimental data, is a great theoretical challenge regarding dynamical observables.
In this paper, we focus on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) for quantum spin systems [@horvatic_nmr_2002], and more specifically on the $1/T_1$ spin-lattice relaxation rate. Indeed, this quantity contains lots of information on the dynamical properties of the system since it is directly related to dynamical spin-spin correlations. Moreover, being a local quantity (a crucial property of NMR technique), we will argue that reliable data can be obtained even though we will simulate finite spin chains.
Being of fundamental interest, the low-$T$ behavior of the NMR relaxation rate has been investigated for several 1d or quasi-1d quantum magnets. Spin-gapped compounds, such as two-leg ladders SrCu$_2$O$_3$ [@azuma_observation_1994], BiCu$_2$PO$_6$ [@alexander_impurity_2010], ${\mathrm{Sr}}_{14-x}{\mathrm{Ca}}_{x}{\mathrm{Cu}}_{24}{\mathrm{O}}_{41}$ [@magishi_spin_1998], weakly coupled Haldane chains ${\mathrm{Y}}_{2}$${\mathrm{BaNiO}}_{5}$ [@shimizu_spin_1995], or dimerized spin chains AgVOAsO$_4$ [@ahmed_alternating-spin-chain_2015], exhibit an activated relaxation at low-$T$. For gapless Heisenberg chain systems, the low-energy critical behavior has been studied [@Sachdev1994; @Sandvik1995; @Starykh1997b; @Barzykin2001] for Sr$_2$CuO$_3$ which is an almost ideal realization with a large $J_{\rm 1d}\sim 2000$ K and much smaller $3$d couplings so that Néel temperature is pushed down to $T_N\simeq 5$ K. For such an SU(2) symmetric material, a careful comparison of experimental and numerical NMR data has shown the prominent role of logarithmic corrections [@Takigawa1997].
Another route to TLL behavior is to apply an external magnetic field on gapped materials such as spin-$1$ Haldane gap compound [@Goto2006] (CH$_3$)$_4$NNi(NO$_2$)$_3$ or dimerized spin-$1/2$ chains [@Izumi2003]. For such systems, a theoretical analysis of the $1/T_1$ behavior has been performed in Refs. .
A useful experimental review on NMR properties of several spin chains can be found in Ref. . Note also that $1/T_1$ measurements have also been used to characterize one-dimensional metallic phase in carbon nanotube [@Ihara2010] or quasi-$1$d superconductor [@Zhi2015].
More recently, interesting quasi-$1$d spin-gapped materials have also been investigated using NMR [@Mukhopadhyay2012]: an anisotropic spin-$1$ system NiCl$_2$-4SC(NH$_2$)$_2$ (DTN) and a spin-ladder one (C$_5$H$_{12}$N)$_2$CuBr$_4$ (BPCB). In both cases, $1/T_1$ measurements could be interpreted either as coming from magnon (respectively spinon) excitations in the gapped (respectively gapless) $1$d phase, and the quantum critical regime was also argued to be universal. Most importantly, the whole temperature range, including $1$d as well as $3$d regimes, was discussed.
Experimentally, when decreasing temperature, the NMR relaxation rate $1/T_1$ has been found to diverge in the TLL regime, with power-law governed by a characteristic exponent. Such an analysis is used in experiments to determine the corresponding TLL exponent $K$ [@Klanjsek2015prl; @Klanjsek2015prb]. For example, it was a smoking-gun signature of *attractive* TLL in (C$_7$H$_{10}$N)$_2$CuBr$_4$ (DIMPY) compound [@Jeong2013; @Jeong2016]. However, given that we are generically dealing with quasi-$1$d materials, critical fluctuations and $3$d ordering will limit the low-energy $1$d regime, and a genuine TLL critical behavior is observable only within some finite window in temperature. This remains to be analyzed more quantitatively, which is the main purpose of this work.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Sec. \[sec:models\], we present the theoretical models and provide useful definitions. Section \[sec:numerics\] describes the numerical technique based on finite temperature Matrix Product States (MPS) approach. Results are then discussed in Sec. \[sec:results\]. Finally, we present our conclusion in Sec. \[sec:conclusion\].
Models and definitions {#sec:models}
======================
We give in this section the two models that will be studied in this paper and a small discussion on their phase diagram. Both models present a TLL gapless phase and a gapped phase, induced by an external magnetic field. We will also provide definition of the NMR relaxation rate $1/T_1$ and discuss its expected behavior with temperature.
Theoretical models
------------------
### The spin-$1/2$ XXZ chain
We first consider one of the simplest paradigmatic example of TLL liquid, namely the spin-$1/2$ XXZ chain Hamiltonian: $$\begin{gathered}
\mathcal{H_\mathrm{XXZ}} = J\sum_{j=1}^{L-1} \left(S^x_{j}S^x_{j+1}+S^y_{j}S^y_{j+1} + \Delta S^z_{j}S^z_{j+1}\right)\\
- g\mu_Bh\sum_{j=1}^{L}S^z_{j}
\label{xxz_ham}
\end{gathered}$$ where $\Delta \in (-1,1]$ denotes the Ising anisotropy, $J$ the coupling strength and $h$ is an applied magnetic field in the $z$ direction with $g$ the gyromagnetic factor and $\mu_B$ the Bohr magneton constant. The Hamiltonian is defined with open boundary conditions (OBC), as will be used in our numerical simulations.
In the range $\Delta \in (-1,1]$ the XXZ model can be described by a TLL as long as its spectrum remains gapless [@Giamarchi]. As a function of magnetic field, the gapless regimes extends up to a critical field $g\mu_Bh_c=J(\Delta+1)$, and the system becomes gapped for $h>h_c$. In the latter regime, the gap increases linearly with the applied magnetic field, $\Delta_g=g\mu_B(h-h_c)$, see Fig. \[fig:magnetization\_curve\].
![(color online) (i) Upper panel : magnetization curve of the XXZ Hamiltonian as a function of the magnetic field for $\Delta \in (-1,1]$. There is a gapless TLL phase below $h_c=J(\Delta+1)/g\mu_B$ and a gapped one above when the system is fully polarized. (ii) Lower panel : magnetization curve of the $1$d DTN Hamiltonian as a function of the magnetic field. Two gapped phases (large-$D$ and polarized) are respectively located below $h_{c1}$ and above $h_{c2}$. The intermediate gapless phase can be described by a TLL theory.[]{data-label="fig:magnetization_curve"}]({magnetization_curve}.pdf){width="\columnwidth"}
### The quasi-$1$d spin-$1$ compound “DTN” {#sec:dtn}
We also discuss a quasi-$1$d magnetic insulator compound NiCl$_2$-4SC(NH$_2$)$_2$, also called DTN, whose relevant $3$d structure consists of weakly coupled $S=1$ chains in the two other transverse (with respect to the chain axis) directions. Its experimental interest comes from the appearance of a Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) phase when applying a magnetic field at low temperature [@zapf_bose-einstein_2006; @Paduan2012]. More recently, Br-doped (disordered) DTN was suggested to be a good experimental candidate for observing a Bose glass phase [@Giamarchi1988; @Fisher1989; @Yu2012].
Although there is 3d magnetic order observed below $T_N\sim 1$ K in DTN [@zapf_bose-einstein_2006] due to weak inter-chain couplings along the two transverse directions, $J_{3\mathrm{d}}/J_{\rm 1d}\simeq 0.08$, one expects 1d physics and a TLL regime at higher $T$. The effective Hamiltonian to describe this situation reads $$\begin{gathered}
\mathcal{H_\mathrm{DTN-1d}}=J\sum_{j=1}^{L-1} \mathbf{S}_j\cdot\mathbf{S}_{j+1}+\sum_{j=1}^{L} \left[D \left(S^{z}_j\right)^2-g\mu_BhS^z_j\right],
\label{dtn_ham_1d}
\end{gathered}$$ where $\mathbf{S_j}=(S^x_j, S^y_j, S^z_j)$ are spin-$1$ operators. In the current literature, [@Filho2007] $J=2.2\, \mathrm{K}$ is the 1d antiferromagnetic coupling and $D=8.9\, \mathrm{K}$ is the single-ion anisotropy. The magnetic field $h$ is given in Tesla with $g=2.31$[^1].
The phase diagram of this 1d Hamiltonian is sketched in Fig. \[fig:magnetization\_curve\]. In the absence of magnetic field, due to the large on-site anisotropy $D$, the system is in the so-called large-$D$ phase [@Schulz1986]. This is a trivial phase, adiabatically connected to the product state $|\rightarrow\ldots\rightarrow\rangle$ where each state is in a non-magnetic $S^z=0$ eigenstate. Clearly, this phase has a finite spin-gap, which corresponds to the first critical field $h_{c1}$ needed to magnetize the system. Its value is known to be, at first order in $J/D\ll 1$ [@Papanicolaou1997]: $h_{c1}/g\mu_B=D-2J+\mathcal{O}(J^2/D)\simeq 3\,\mathrm{T}$. At finite magnetic field there is a gapless TLL regime for $h\in [h_{c1},h_{c2}]$, with $h_{c2}/g\mu_B=D+4J= 11.40\,\mathrm{T}$. Above this critical saturation field, the system becomes gapped again, entering a fully polarized phase. As a side remark, we recall that in the true 3d material DTN, both critical fields are shifted due to interchain couplings, so that $h_{c1}=2.10(5)\, \mathrm{T}$ [@wulf_critical_2015], and $h_{c2}=12.32\, \mathrm{T}$ [@Blinder2016].
In the TLL phase and close to the upper critical field $h_{c2}$, the DTN Hamiltonian can be mapped toward an effective XXZ model of spins $S=1/2$ . Using perturbation theory, effective parameters [@Mukhopadhyay2012; @Psaroudaki2014] are given by $\tilde{J}=2J$ and $\tilde{\Delta}=0.5$. This result can be refined using contractor renormalization (CORE) method [@Morningstar1996; @Capponi2004] leading to the same value of $\tilde{J}$ but a slightly reduced $\tilde{\Delta}=0.36$. Both mappings lead to a value of the effective magnetic field $\tilde{h} = h - J - D$.
Relaxation rate $\mathbf{1/T_1}$ {#sec:T1_def}
--------------------------------
The nuclear spin-lattice relaxation rate $T_1^{-1}$ measured by NMR [@Abragam] is basically testing the *local* and *dynamical* spin correlation function $S^{aa}_{nn}\left(\omega_0\right)$ with $a=x,y,z$, and $\omega_0$ being the NMR frequency at a given site $n$, $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{1}{T_1}&=&\frac{\gamma^2}{2}\left\{A^2_\perp \left[S^{xx}_{nn}\left(\omega_0\right)+S^{yy}_{nn}\left(\omega_0\right)\right] + A^2_\parallel S^{zz}_{nn}\left(\omega_0\right)\right\}\nonumber\\
&=& \frac{1}{T_1^\perp} + \frac{1}{T_1^\parallel}
\label{T1_def1}\end{aligned}$$ Here, $A_\perp$ is the transverse hyperfine coupling constant, $A_\parallel$ the longitudinal one, $\gamma$ the gyromagnetic ratio and $$\begin{gathered}
S^{ab}_{nn}\left(\omega\right)= \mathrm{Re}\left\{2\int_0^\infty\mathrm{d}t\,e^{i\omega t}\left[\langle S^a_n\left(t\right)S^b_n\left(0\right)\rangle\right.\right.\\
-\left.\left.\langle S^a_n\left(t\right)\rangle\langle S^b_n\left(0\right)\rangle\right]\vphantom{\int_0^\infty}\right\},
\label{dyn_corr_def}\end{gathered}$$ with $S^a = {S^b}^\dag$, $S^a(t)=e^{i\mathcal{H}t}S^ae^{-i\mathcal{H}t}$, and $\langle\rangle$ is the thermal average defined later in . For convenience, the $x$ and $y$ spin components can be expressed using the raising and lowering operators, $$S^{xx}_{nn}\left(\omega\right)+S^{yy}_{nn}\left(\omega\right)=\frac{1}{2}\left[S^{+-}_{nn}\left(\omega\right)+S^{-+}_{nn}\left(\omega\right)\right].$$
It is theoretically justified to take the limit $\omega_0\rightarrow 0$ since the NMR frequency is of a few tens or hundreds of $\mathrm{MHz}$, corresponding to temperatures of the order of mK, thus being the smallest energy scale in the problem. Indeed, such temperatures are neither reached in experiments of interest nor in our numerical simulations, in particular for our purpose of probing the finite temperature TLL regime in quasi-1d systems. As a side remark, the two correlations $S^{+-}_{nn}\left(\omega_0\right)$ and $S^{-+}_{nn}\left(\omega_0\right)$ become equivalent in this limit $\omega_0 \rightarrow 0$.
The weight of the transverse and longitudinal contributions in the relaxation rate $1/T_1$ is experimentally governed by the hyperfine coupling tensors $A_\perp$ and $A_\parallel$. To favor one over the other, a specific nucleus can be targeted for the NMR experiment. In the case of DTN, proton ${}^1$H (nuclear spin $I=1/2$) probes both components while nitrogen ${}^{14}$N ($I=1$) probes dominantly the transverse one [@Blinder2016].
Hyperfine coupling tensors put aside or set equal to one, the low temperature behavior of the transverse and longitudinal components of $1/T_1$ depends on microscopic parameters of the model. At low temperature, the transverse component is larger than the longitudinal one and it is thus justified to consider $1/T_1\simeq 1/T_1^\perp$. In the following we will fix $\gamma^2 A^2_{\perp,\parallel}=1$, and compute the relaxation rates $$\frac{1}{T_1^\perp} = \int_0^\infty\mathrm{d}t\,\mathrm{Re}\left[\langle S^\pm_n\left(t\right)S^\mp_n\left(0\right)\rangle\right],
\label{t1_perp}$$ and $$\begin{gathered}
\frac{1}{T_1^\parallel}= \int_0^\infty\mathrm{d}t\,\mathrm{Re}\left[\langle S^z_n\left(t\right)S^z_n\left(0\right)\rangle-\langle S^z_n\left(t\right)\rangle\langle S^z_n\left(0\right)\rangle\right].
\label{t1_parallel}\end{gathered}$$
Note that the single operator averages are time independent, $\langle S^z_n\left(t\right)\rangle=\langle S^z_n\left(0\right)\rangle$.
Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid description in the gapless phase
----------------------------------------------------------
The 1d gapless phase, experimentally accessible by tuning a control parameter such as the external magnetic field, can be effectively described by the TLL Hamiltonian[@Giamarchi], $$\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{TLL}}=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int \mathrm{d}r\left\{uK\left[\partial_r\theta\left(r\right)\right]^2+\frac{u}{K}\left[\partial_r\phi\left(r\right)\right]^2\right\}
\label{ll_ham}$$ where $u$ is the velocity of excitations and $K$ is the dimensionless TLL parameter. They both fully characterize the low-energy properties of the system and are thus model-dependent. $\theta(r)$ and $\phi(r)$ are bosonic fields obeying the commutation relation $[\phi(x), \theta(y)]=i\pi\delta(x-y)$.
For the XXZ model , the TLL parameters $K$ and $u$ are known from Bethe ansatz equations [@Luther1975]. At zero magnetic field, analytical expressions are known as a function of the Ising anisotropy $\Delta$: $$K=\frac{\pi}{2\arccos\left(-\Delta\right)}\quad\mathrm{and}\quad \frac{u}{J}=\frac{\pi\sqrt{1-\Delta^2}}{2\arccos{\Delta}}.
\label{ll_params_xxz}$$ For generic non-integrable models, the TLL parameters can be obtained numerically using DMRG by fitting static correlation functions [@Hikihara2001; @Hikihara2004] which has been successfully done in the past years for various quasi-$1$d compounds [@Klanjsek2008; @Schmidiger2012].
In the TLL framework, the dynamical correlation $S^{ab}_{nn}(\omega)$ defined in can be computed analytically as a function of the temperature in the “*low energy limit*” which we will try to define more precisely in this paper. Let us recall that the dynamical spin susceptibility is defined as, $$\chi_{ij}^{ab}\left(t\right)=-i\Theta\left(t\right)\langle \left[S^a_i\left(t\right), S^b_j\left(0\right)\right]\rangle,
\label{susceptibility}$$ where $\Theta(t)$ is the Heaviside function. Since a typical relevant case in experiments is the *local* quantity $i=j=n$, we only consider this case in the following. In frequency space, the susceptibility can be related to the dynamical spin correlation function by [@Sachdev2011] $$S^{ab}_{nn}\left(\omega\right)=\frac{2}{e^{-\beta\omega}-1}\mathrm{Im}\left[\chi_{nn}^{ab}\left(\omega\right)\right].
\label{corr_susceptibility}$$ In the low energy limit $\beta\omega\ll 1$ an analytical expression for Eq. can be obtained, leading to [@Klanjsek2008; @Bouillot2011; @Bouillot2011thesis] $$\begin{gathered}
\frac{1}{T_1^\perp} =\\
\frac{2A_x\cos\left(\frac{\pi}{4K}\right)}{u}\left(\frac{2\pi T}{u}\right)^{\frac{1}{2K}-1} B\left(\frac{1}{4K},1-\frac{1}{2K}\right),
\label{ll_spsm_corr}\end{gathered}$$ and $$\begin{gathered}
\frac{1}{T_1^\parallel} = \frac{A_z\cos\left(\pi K\right)}{2u}\left(\frac{2\pi T}{u}\right)^{2K-1}B\left(K,1-2K\right)\\
+\frac{KT}{4\pi u^2},
\label{ll_szsz_corr}
\end{gathered}$$ with $B(x,y)$ the Euler beta function and $A_{x,z}$ prefactors of the static correlation functions. Thus, generically $1/T_1^\perp(T)$ diverges at zero temperature as a $K$-dependent power-law, and dominates over $1/T_1^\parallel$. Note that for finite magnetic field (equivalent to non half-filled case), additional subleading corrections are expected [@Suzuki2006].
Gapped regime behavior
----------------------
In contrast to a TLL gapless phase where $1/T_1$ has power-law behavior at low temperature, we also consider the gapped regime where fluctuations are exponentially suppressed [@jolicur_ensuremathsigma-model_1994; @troyer_thermodynamics_1994; @sagi_theory_1996; @kishine_spin_1997; @sachdev_low_1997; @Orignac2007], such that for $T< \Delta_g$ $$\frac{1}{T_1^{\perp,\parallel}} \propto \exp \left(-\alpha_{\perp,\parallel} \Delta_g/T\right),
\label{T1_gapped_phase}$$ where $\Delta_g$ is the energy gap of the system, and $\alpha_{\perp,\parallel}$ an $\mathcal{O}(1)$ prefactor which depends on the relaxation processes, and also on the temperature range [@kishine_spin_1997]. Below, in section \[sec:gappedxxz\], we show numerical results for the high-field gapped regime of the XXZ chain where our data are perfectly described by $\alpha_{\perp,\parallel}=1$. At higher temperature above the gap, one may also expect a non-trivial crossover to TLL regime [@Dora2007].
Numerical methods {#sec:numerics}
=================
To get the relaxation rate one needs to obtain in the first place the dynamical correlation $\left\langle S^a_n\left(t\right)S^b_n\left(0\right)\right\rangle$. We used the TEBD (Time Evolution Block Decimation) algorithm [@Vidal2004] with both real/imaginary time through the MPS formalism adapted for $1$d systems [@Schollwock2011]. A general one-dimensional system containing $L$ sites with OBC can be represented by the following MPS, $$|\Psi\rangle = \sum_{\{s_i\}} A^{s_1}_{a_1}A^{s_2}_{a_1a_2}\cdots A^{s_L}_{a_{L-1}}|{s_1}\rangle|s_2\rangle\cdots |s_L\rangle
\label{general_mps_form}$$ where the local index $s_i$ is the physical index representing an element of the local Hilbert space at site $i$. Its dimension is $d$ and is equal to $2$ ($\uparrow$ and $\downarrow$) for spin-$1/2$ or $3$ ($\uparrow$, $\downarrow$ and $\rightarrow$) for spin-$1$. We note $a_i$ the bond index whose dimension is directly related to the “number of states” $m$ to describe the system, meaning that $m$ is a control parameter in the numerical simulations.
The first step is to perform an imaginary time evolution on the system to reach the desired temperature. Once the state is at hand, the second step consists of evolving it through a real time evolution. At each time step, the correlation is measured. When all the data in time-space have been obtained, a numerical Fourier Transform can be performed to get the data in frequency-space.
Time evolution with MPS {#subsec:tebd_mps}
-----------------------
We will be general and consider the case with a Hamiltonian $\mathcal{H}$ consisting of nearest-neighbor interactions only – it is the case for the XXZ or DTN Hamiltonian introduced before. Now, we need to evolve our MPS up to a time $t$. The operation can be discretized using smaller time steps $\tau$ such that $t=N\tau$, leading to $e^{-it\mathcal{H}} = \prod^N e^{-i\tau\mathcal{H}}$. If the time step $\tau$ is small enough, a first (or higher) order Trotter decomposition can be performed, $$e^{-it\mathcal{H}} \simeq \prod^{N} e^{-i\tau\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{even}}} \prod^{N} e^{-i\tau\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{odd}}} + \mathcal{O}(\tau^2)
\label{mps_trotter_tevol}$$ where $\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{even}}$ and $\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{odd}}$ respectively correspond to the even and odd bond Hamiltonians only acting on two nearest-neighbor spins. The decomposition is possible because even – odd – bond Hamiltonians commute with each others. But it is not exact and leads to an error in $\tau$ due to the fact that $[\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{even}}, \mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{odd}}] \neq 0$. The advantage is that the bond Hamiltonians can easily be diagonalized and exponentiated since they are only $d^2\times d^2$ matrices.
And so, applying successive evolution gates on the MPS as well as singular value decompositions to restore the MPS original tensor-site dependent form will eventually lead to a time-$t$ evolved state.
Finite temperature with MPS
---------------------------
It was useful to introduce time-evolution concepts also to discuss finite-temperature with MPS [@Verstraete2004]. The main idea is to represent the density matrix $\rho_\beta$ of the physical (mixed) state in an artificially enlarged Hilbert space as a pure state $|\Psi_\beta\rangle$ – which is what we can deal with in the MPS formalism. The auxiliary space can simply be constructed as a copy of the original one.
Assuming that we know the purification of the density matrix $\rho_{\beta=0}$ as a wave function $|\Psi_{\beta=0}\rangle$ it can be shown that an imaginary time evolution has to be performed over the infinite temperature state in order to get the finite temperature state, $$|\Psi_\beta\rangle = e^{-\beta\mathcal{H}/2} |\Psi_{\beta=0}\rangle
\label{mps_temp_tevol}$$ with the Hamiltonian only acting on the physical sites. This imaginary time evolution can be performed using the TEBD algorithm described before in \[subsec:tebd\_mps\]. Expectation values can then be measured at inverse temperature, $$\langle\mathcal{O}\rangle_\beta = \frac{\mathrm{Tr}\left[\mathcal{O}e^{-\beta\mathcal{H}}\right]}{\mathrm{Tr}\left[e^{-\beta\mathcal{H}}\right]}=\frac{\langle\Psi_\beta|\mathcal{O}|\Psi_\beta\rangle}{\langle\Psi_\beta|\Psi_\beta\rangle}
\label{mps_temp_0bs}$$ For this procedure to work, the initial state $|\Psi_{\beta=0}\rangle$ has to be a product state of Bell states between each physical site and its associated auxiliary site, $$|\Psi_{\beta=0}\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\mathcal{N}}}\prod_{n=1}^L\sum_{\{s\}}|p^n_sa^n_s\rangle
\label{mps_temp_init}$$ with $|p\rangle$ corresponding to physical sites, $|a\rangle$ to auxiliary ones and $\mathcal{N}$ a normalization constant. The summation is over the $d$ possible local states $s$. Such a state is simple enough to be built exactly in the MPS formalism.
Numerical limitations
---------------------
The main limitations are about the temperature and the final time one can reach using the methods described above. The reason in both cases is directly related to a rapid growth in the entanglement entropy while evolving the state. This implies to keep larger and larger number of states $m$ in the MPS if one wants to be accurate, strongly limiting numerical simulations in practice.
On the one hand, it becomes increasingly difficult to reach low temperatures. Indeed, one expects a volume-law entanglement entropy (*i.e.* linear with the system size $L$) due to the auxiliary sites which are used to purify the thermal state. As a consequence, the number of kept states $m$ needed to describe accurately the system will grow exponentially as the temperature $T$ decreases.
On the other hand, the maximal (real) time that can be reached is of the order of few tens of $J^{-1}$ typically, for similar reasons as discussed above, namely the linear growth of entanglement entropy with time [@Laflorencie2016]. Thus, fixing a maximum number of kept states $m$ limits simulations to a finite time $t_{\mathrm max}$. Note that this limitation applies at *all* temperatures, even $T=0$.
Despite these severe limitations, recent progress in the field has allowed some improvements. For instance, we will make use of the auxiliary degrees of freedom which are used to purify the thermal state by time-evolving them with $-\mathcal{H}$, which is mathematically exactly the same but has been shown to improve substantially the time range [@Karrasch2013]. By construction, this trick only applies to finite-temperature simulations though. Last, although its use did not prove to be systematically reliable in our case, we would like to mention the possibility to use so-called *linear prediction* technique, coming from data analysis [@Barthel2013] which aims at predicting “longer time” behavior from the knowledge of dynamical correlations at “intermediate time”.
Results {#sec:results}
=======
We provide in this section our numerical results [^2] about the relaxation rate $1/T_1$ using models and techniques presented in the previous sections \[sec:models\] and \[sec:numerics\]. First of all we will focus on the XX model (equivalent to free fermions) for which we can compute exactly the dynamical correlations for all temperatures and that will serve as a benchmark for our simulations. Next, we will turn to the interacting XXZ case for $S=1/2$, and then to a $S=1$ chain model relevant to the DTN material.
Case study : XX point ($\Delta=0$)
----------------------------------
{width="2\columnwidth"}
The XXZ Hamiltonian at $\Delta=0$, known as XX model, can be mapped onto a model of free spinless fermions using a Jordan-Wigner transformation. We restrict ourselves to $h=0$. It can be diagonalized in Fourier space with $\varepsilon_k=J\cos k$ and $k=\frac{n\pi}{L+1}$ with $n=1, 2,\ldots,L$ considering open boundary conditions, $$\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{XX}}=\frac{J}{2}\sum_{j=1}^{L-1}\left(c^\dag_jc_{j+1} + \mathrm{h.c.}\right) = \sum_k \varepsilon_k c^\dag_k c_k.$$ Unlike the bosonization expressions and which are only valid in the low-energy limit, the results presented in this section will be valid for *all* regimes. We present the details of the calculations in appendix \[app:xx\] for the analytical exact expressions of the dynamical correlations for the XX model using precisely the same conditions as in our numerical simulations (*i.e.* a finite chain length with open boundary conditions).
We show the ‘bare’ results in Fig. \[fig:xx\_twspace\] that will be used to obtain the relaxation rate thereafter. Ideally, one is interested in the thermodynamic limit (*i.e.* $L\rightarrow\infty$) but we see that, at finite temperature (hence finite correlation length), working on finite length chains with only a moderate number of sites $L$ allows to get reliable data. Indeed, the MPS estimates agree perfectly with the exact expressions (see appendix \[app:xx\]).
First of all, we consider the local dynamical correlation of the site in the middle of the chain reducing de facto boundary effects. Then, as finite size effects are known to be caused by the reflection of the propagating excitations at TLL velocity $u$ on the boundary of the system, one can estimate a time below which the dynamical correlations can be considered as free of finite size effects (basically, $ut\sim L$).
We first discuss the transverse correlations, see Fig. \[fig:xx\_twspace\]. For all temperatures, they decay rather quickly to zero, so that we can safely truncate data to a maximum time $t_{\mathrm{max}}$ (which is anyway a natural cutoff provided by the inverse of the NMR frequency $\omega_0$) and get reliable values of $1/T_1^\perp$ by integrating over time. Moreover, we have also checked that finite size effects are extremely small since we are computing a local correlation.
The same cannot be said for the longitudinal correlations. They continue to oscillate even for high temperatures and long times, and their amplitude gets (very) slowly smaller with time. This implies severe limitations to get data in the thermodynamic limit. For instance, exact computations using were done on $L=1000$ and still displayed oscillations of amplitude around $10^{-4}$ at $t=1000~J^{-1}$. This makes the value of $1/T_1^\parallel$ very difficult to estimate. This well-known behavior is related to spin diffusion-like behavior [@Fabricius1998; @Sirker2006] which cause a logarithmic divergence at small frequency $\omega$. However, we have to remember that the NMR frequency $\omega_0$ eventually provides a natural cutoff.
For completeness we display the real part of the Fourier transform on the right panels of Fig. \[fig:xx\_twspace\] for which the $1/T_1$ value as defined in section \[sec:T1\_def\] corresponds to the $\omega=0$ value.
Spin-1/2 XXZ chain at $\Delta\neq 0$
------------------------------------
### Gapless regime
Building on the perfect agreement observed previously between MPS estimates and the exact analytical solution of the XX model, we are now confident to extend our study of the more generic XXZ case $-1<\Delta\leq 1$, described by a TLL, and compute the relaxation rates. Results are plotted in Fig. \[fig:xxz\_t1\_perp\] for various values of the anisotropy. The simulations were performed on systems of size $L=64$ with a cutoff of $\varepsilon=10^{-10}$ in the singular values. We kept a maximal number of $D=500$ states. A fourth order Trotter decomposition was used with a Trotter step of $\tau=0.1$.
First, in the gapless regime we do observe an excellent quantitative agreement between numerical estimates and the TLL prediction Eq. at low-enough temperature. This asymptotic regime with a power-law behavior $\sim T^{\frac{1}{2K}-1}$ occurs only below $T/J\sim 0.1-0.2$ (depending on the anisotropy $\Delta$). Here we stress that *there are no free parameters in the analytic expressions*. Indeed, the TLL parameters are computed using the exact expressions Eq. for $u$ and $K$, and $A_x$ is obtained following Refs. . The isotropic limit $\Delta=1$ is a special point where logarithmic corrections appear in several quantities [@affleck_critical_1989; @eggert_susceptibility_1994; @affleck_exact_1998], leading to a very slow divergence of the (isotropic) NMR relaxation rate [@barzykin_temperature-dependent_2000; @Barzykin2001] $$\frac{1}{T_1}\simeq\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi^3}}\sqrt{\ln\frac{\Lambda}{T}+\frac{1}{2}\ln\left(\ln\frac{\Lambda}{T}\right)},
\label{eq:su2}$$ where $\Lambda\simeq 24.27J$. MPS estimates compare well with this *parameter-free* expression, as visible in Fig. \[fig:xxz\_t1\_perp\].
![(color online) Transverse relaxation rate $1/T_1^\perp$ [*[vs.]{}*]{} reduced temperature $T/J$ for the spin-$1/2$ XXZ chain at various $\Delta$ and $h=0$ obtained numerically using MPS techniques (circles, from top to bottom: $\Delta=-0.8,\,-0.6,\,-0.5,\,-0.4,\,-0.2,\,0.0,\,0.2,\,0.4,\,0.5,\,0.6,\,0.8,\,1$). Numerics are compared to TLL theory Eq. at low temperature (thick lines) for $|\Delta|<1$, and with Eq. for the SU(2) Heisenberg point $\Delta=1$. The thin lines between the circles are guides to the eyes.[]{data-label="fig:xxz_t1_perp"}](xxz_t1_perp.pdf){width="\columnwidth"}
Interestingly, we notice the non-monotonic behavior of $1/T_1^\perp$ with temperature only when $\Delta\gtrsim 0$ (which corresponds to repulsive or vanishing interactions in the fermionic language).
As a last comment, we have observed that for infinite temperature ($\beta=0$), the value of $1/T_1^\perp$ does not depend on the sign of $\Delta$, which is expected since the many-body spectrum of ${\mathcal{H}}_\Delta$ is an odd function of $\Delta$. Its value is minimum for $\Delta=0$ with $1/T_1^\perp=\sqrt{\pi}/(2J)$ [@Fabricius1997] and increases with $|\Delta|$. At the isotropic point $|\Delta|=1$ we expect the relaxation rate to diverge due to the diffusion-like behavior [@Fabricius1998; @Sirker2006] of the dynamical correlation function. Our results at infinite-$T$ go beyond Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff expansion developed up to ${\cal O}(t^2)$ in Ref. to compute $\langle S^{\pm}_j(t)S^{\mp}_j(0)\rangle$ at short times, which would suggest $1/T_1^\perp\sim J^{-1}(1+\Delta^2)^{-\frac{1}{2}}$. This prediction is in contrast to what we found, namely the transverse relaxation rate *increasing* with $|\Delta|$. Indeed, while such an expansion finds the correct gaussian behavior for $\Delta=0$ (free-fermions), higher-order terms have to be taken into account for $|\Delta|>0$ where the transverse dynamical correlation function at longer times gets larger when increasing $|\Delta|$.
### Gapped XXZ chain {#sec:gappedxxz}
We then set the anisotropy value to $\Delta=0.5$ and apply a magnetic field to move into the gapped phase. Transverse and longitudinal relaxation rates $1/T_1^{\perp,\parallel}$ are plotted in Fig. \[fig:xxz\_t1\_perp\_delta\_0.5\] where we observe an excellent agreement with an exponentially activated behavior $\sim \exp(-\beta\Delta_g)$, where $\Delta_g $ is the spin gap. We notice that as the gap gets smaller, the lower the temperature has to be to observe the exponential law.
![(color online) Transverse and longitudinal relaxation rates $1/T_1^{\perp,\parallel}$ plotted against reduced inverse temperature $\beta J$ for the spin-$1/2$ XXZ chain in its gapped phase for the anisotropy $\Delta=0.5$. The critical magnetic field is $h_c=3J/2g\mu_B$ and the value of the gap $\Delta_g=g\mu_B\left(h-h_c\right)$. Numerical results are obtained using MPS techniques (circles and diamonds) and the exponentially decaying behavior is verified with the straight lines set with the expected gap value $1/T_1^{\perp,\parallel}=c_{\perp,\parallel}\cdot e^{-\beta\Delta_g}$ and $c_{\perp,\parallel}$ a non-universal free parameter.[]{data-label="fig:xxz_t1_perp_delta_0.5"}]({xxz_t1_perp_delta_0.5}.pdf){width="\columnwidth"}
DTN
---
We now move to the DTN compound in its $1$d limit described by Eq. . We compute the relaxation rates for various values of the magnetic field $h$, mainly close to $h_{c2}$ which is relevant for NMR experiments [@Mukhopadhyay2012]. It is a more challenging system to simulate than the XXZ model as it is made of spins $S=1$ (enlarged local Hilbert space). The simulations were performed on open chains of size $L=64$ with a cutoff of $\varepsilon=10^{-10}$ in the singular values. We kept a maximal number of $D=150$ states. A fourth order Trotter decomposition was used with a Trotter step of $\tau=0.02$.
![(color online) Transverse relaxation rate $1/T_1^\perp$ plotted [*[vs.]{}*]{} temperature $T$ for the spin-$1$ DTN chain obtained numerically using MPS techniques (circles). The low temperature behavior is compared to TLL prediction (straight lines). The magnetic field $h$ is given in Tesla. The inset compares TLL prediction and numerical results for $T=0.4\,\mathrm{K}$ and covers the whole TLL phase from $h_{c1}$ to $h_{c2}$. The lower panel is a zoom on the low temperature asymptotic power-law regime.[]{data-label="fig:dtn_t1_perp"}]({dtn_t1_perp_with_inset}.pdf){width="\columnwidth"}
Numerical results, shown in Fig. \[fig:dtn\_t1\_perp\], compare extremely well with TLL prediction at low temperature. Interestingly, the TLL power-law behavior starts at slightly higher temperature, as compared to the XXZ model, $T\simeq 0.5\,\mathrm{K}$ ($T/J\sim 0.2$), especially as we approach the middle of the TLL phase, away from the critical field $h_{c2}$. We point out that there are again no adjustable coefficients, the TLL parameters being computed independently using standard DMRG [^3]. The tiny difference that appears at low temperature between numerical data and TLL is due to the limited number of states $m$ kept when performing calculations. Though this does not dispute the TLL prediction, it reveals the challenge in such time-dependent simulations. The inset in Fig. \[fig:dtn\_t1\_perp\] shows the transverse relaxation rate at $T=0.4\,\mathrm{K}$ for various values of the magnetic field covering the whole range from $h_{c1}$ to $h_{c2}$. Once more, there is a very good agreement between numerics and TLL theory except when one gets close to the critical fields. Indeed, as we clearly see in the lower panel of Fig. \[fig:dtn\_t1\_perp\] for $h=11.0\,\mathrm{T}$, the power law is not met yet for the lowest temperature we could reach $T=0.2\,\mathrm{K}$.
The non-monotonic behavior of $1/T_1^\perp$ observed in the XXZ model is absent for the DTN and may seem odd at first place since it can be mapped effectively onto a $S=1/2$ XXZ chain with $\Delta=0.5$ or $0.36$ and could thus be compared with Fig. \[fig:xxz\_t1\_perp\]. However this non-monotonic variation is observed at high temperature while this mapping is only justified in the low-energy limit as discussed in \[sec:dtn\].
One can also try to compare the relaxation rates of Fig. \[fig:dtn\_t1\_perp\] with the NMR data for the DTN compound given in Ref . What draws our attention is the non-monotonic regime of $1/T_1^\perp$ observed at high temperature experimentally, which, as we have just discussed, is not theoretically predicted for a single DTN chain. Yet it cannot be attributed to $3$d effects as $J_{3\mathrm{d}}=0.18$ K is very small compared to the temperature $T$. We then observed that experiments are performed by proton ($^1H$) NMR which probes [*[both]{}*]{} $1/T_1^{\perp}$ and $1/T_1^{\parallel}$.
We therefore interpret this effect as due to the parallel contribution of the relaxation rate. We show in Fig. \[fig:dtn\_t1\_para\] both the transverse and longitudinal $1/T_1^{\perp,\parallel}$ as a function of temperature. We cannot precisely estimate the value of $1/T_1^\parallel$ due to its dependence on $\omega_0$ (and therefore on our maximum time in numerical simulations) so that we give a lower bound. Its high temperature contribution to the total relaxation rate clearly dominates over the transverse part and explains well the experimental non-monotonic regime at high $T$.
Perhaps more importantly, as displayed in Fig. \[fig:dtn\_t1\_para\], the 3d BEC ordering observed in DTN [@zapf_bose-einstein_2006; @Blinder2016] for $m^z\simeq 0.85$ at $T_N\simeq~0.59\,\mathrm{K}$ occurs [*[above]{}*]{} the asymptotic regime where the genuine TLL power-law behavior is expected. It is therefore impossible to directly extract TLL exponents in DTN, because of interchain effects that eventually lead to an ordering of the coupled TLLs. Ideally we would expect for quasi-1d systems the TLL description of the NMR relaxation to be valid in the following temperature regime: $J_{\rm 1d}\gg T\gg J_{\rm 3d}$.
![(color online) Longitudinal $1/T_1^\parallel$ and transverse $1/T_1^\perp$ relaxation rates for the DTN spin-$1$ chain at $h=11.0\,\mathrm{T}$, corresponding to $m^z\simeq 0.85$. As $1/T_1^\parallel$ cannot be estimated for sure, we only provide a lower bound. The non-monotonic behavior observed experimentally at high $T$ in Ref apparently comes from the large contribution of $1/T_1^\parallel$ at high temperature. Experimental data for DTN [@Mukhopadhyay2012] at the same magnetization are shown for comparison, after a proper rescaling in order to match the low-$T$ regime. The 3d BEC transition temperature $T_N(m^z\simeq 0.85)\simeq 0.59$ K [@Blinder2016] is also shown.[]{data-label="fig:dtn_t1_para"}]({dtn_t1_para}.pdf){width="\columnwidth"}
Concerning the difficulty to obtain reliable data at high temperature for the longitudinal $1/T_1^\parallel$, it is well known that this is due to spin diffusion-like behavior [@Fabricius1998; @Sirker2006]. Therefore, measurements should in principle depend explicitly on the NMR frequency $\omega_0$.
Conclusion {#sec:conclusion}
==========
Performing time-dependent numerical simulations at finite temperature on $1$d systems to compute the NMR relaxation rate $1/T_1$, we have discussed the temperature range validity of analytical predictions for two models (i) the paradigmatic example for Tomonaga-Lutinger liquids: the spin-$1/2$ XXZ chain for various Ising anisotropies, and (ii) a more realistic $S=1$ Hamiltonian, relevant for experiments on the DTN compound as a function of an external magnetic field.
Both models present in some regime a gapless phase that can be described by TLL “*low-energy*” theory, with a relaxation rate dominated by its transverse component $1/T_1^\perp\sim T^{\frac{1}{2K}-1}$ algebraically diverging at low temperature, where $K$ is the dimensionless TLL exponent. We observed that the expected power-law behavior occurs only below $T/J_{1\mathrm{d}}\sim 0.1-0.2$, thus defining the low-energy limit of validity of TLL theory an order of magnitude below the energy scale $J_{1\mathrm{d}}$ of the system. It is important to be able to define this limit as TLL predictions are often used experimentally on quasi-1d compounds to extract the value of $K$. As a consequence, we believe that it remains experimentally challenging [@Izumi2003], and often impossible, to explore a genuine critical $1$d regime in quasi-$1$d compounds when $J_{1\mathrm{d}}$ is small and $3$d ordering prevents a wide TLL regime. For instance, we have shown that for DTN, the BEC ordering temperature is larger than the crossover temperature towards TLL behavior.
We have also studied the transverse relaxation rates of these two models in other regimes than TLL theory. First, we considered high temperatures, with a peculiar non-monotonic behavior in the $S=1/2$ XXZ model in the repulsive regime at high $T$, which does not exist for the 1d $S=1$ model of DTN. However, such a non-monotonic dependence with temperature at high $T$ is experimentally observed in DTN. We showed that this effect comes from the parallel contribution of the relaxation rate $1/T_1^\parallel$ dominating at high temperature over the transverse part. Finally, we verified that in gapped phases the relaxation rates are exponentially suppressed $\sim\exp\left(-\Delta_g/T\right)$ and can indeed lead to accurate determinations of the spin gap, at least in a regime of temperature $T\ll\Delta_g$ since other relaxation mechanisms can change the activated behavior at higher temperature.
We want to emphasize again the role of $3$d ordering at finite temperature, preventing the observation of a $1$d TLL regime. As discussed for the particular case of DTN, one needs a hierarchy of energy scale $J_{\rm 1d}\gg T\gg J_{\rm 3d}$ to be able to directly extract the TLL exponent $K$ from the divergence of $T_1^{-1}$ with $T$.
Concerning future advances for quasi-1d systems, we can envision trying to simulate imaginary-time dynamics using quantum Monte-Carlo techniques, provided that the model has no minus-sign problem. While it will be necessary to perform a numerical analytic continuation (using for instance Maximum Entropy techniques), we have some hope that this could lead to reliable results to quantitatively capture the influence of interchain effects. For 1d chains, it has been rather successful [@Sandvik1995]. As a matter of fact, our extensive $1$d results could serve as useful benchmarks for that too.
While we have considered various chains, we are far from being exhaustive. Indeed, there are some TLL models for which elementary excitations may not be simple spin flips, for instance multipolar nematic phase for which $1/T_1$ behavior will be different [@Sato2009; @Sato2011]. In a similar line of thought, we could imagine simulating more complicated models including charge and spin degrees of freedom to describe NMR relaxation in metallic or superconducting wires.\
[*Note added :*]{} While completing this work, a related numerical study by Coira [*et al.*]{} has appeared [@Coira2016]. Our results are perfectly compatible with each other when comparison can be made, such as the transverse $1/T_1$ data for a single spin-$1/2$ XXZ chain with $\Delta\geq 0$.\
Acknowledgment {#acknowledgment .unnumbered}
==============
The authors are grateful to M. Horvatić and M. Klanjšek for their careful reading of this manuscript and thoughtful comments and to R. Blinder, T. Giamarchi and E. Orignac for valuable discussions. This work was performed using HPC resources from GENCI (Grant No. x2015050225 and No. x2016050225), and is supported by the French ANR program BOLODISS and Région Midi-Pyrénées.
Dynamical correlations for the XX model {#app:xx}
=======================================
For completeness, we remind the reader the exact expressions for time-displaced spin correlations in the exactly solvable XX model.
Longitudinal correlations
-------------------------
The longitudinal correlations $\langle S^{z}_i\left(t\right)S^{z}_j\left(0\right)\rangle$ for the XX model are basically density correlations when performing the Jordan-Wigner transformation. Since we are interested in the temperature dependence of the correlations, what we need to compute is actually, $$\begin{gathered}
\langle S^{z}_i\left(t\right)S^{z}_j\left(0\right)\rangle =\frac{1}{\mathcal{Z}}\mathrm{Tr}\left[e^{i\mathcal{H}t}S^{z}_ie^{-i\mathcal{H}t}S^{z}_je^{-\beta\mathcal{H}}\right]\end{gathered}$$ with $\mathcal{Z}=\mathrm{Tr}e^{-\beta\mathcal{H}}$ the partition function. Calculations lead to[@Katsura1970], $$\langle S^{z}_i\left(t\right)S^{z}_j\left(0\right)\rangle = \frac{1}{4}I_1 I_2
\label{long_corr_xx}$$ with $I_1$, $$\begin{gathered}
I_1 = \frac{2}{L+1}\sum_{k}
\sin ki\sin kj\left[1 + \tanh\frac{\beta\varepsilon_k}{2}\right]e^{-i\varepsilon_k t}\end{gathered}$$ and $I_2$, $$\begin{gathered}
I_2 = \frac{2}{L+1}\sum_{k}
\sin ki\sin kj\left[1 - \tanh\frac{\beta\varepsilon_k}{2}\right]e^{+i\varepsilon_k t}.\end{gathered}$$ Also, the single operator averages are $$\langle S^z_i(t)\rangle = \langle S^z_i(0)\rangle = 1 - \frac{4}{L+1} \sum_k \frac{\sin^2 ki}{e^{-\beta\varepsilon_k}+1}.$$
Transverse correlations
-----------------------
The transverse correlations $\langle S^{\pm}_i\left(t\right)S^{\mp}_j\left(0\right)\rangle$ have a more complicated structure in the fermion representation due to the string of operators in the exponential[@Stolze1995]. We introduce the following identity $e^{i\pi c^\dag_lc_l} = (-1)^{c^\dag_lc_l} = A_lB_l$ with $A_l=c^\dag_l+c_l$ and $B_l=c^\dag_l-c_l$, leading to $$\begin{gathered}
2\langle S^{\pm}_i\left(t\right)S^{\mp}_j\left(0\right)\rangle = \left\langle\left[\prod_{l=1}^{i-1}A_l(t)B_l(t)\right]A_i(t)\right.\\
\left.\left[\prod_{l=1}^{j-1}A_l(0)B_l(0)\right]A_j(0)\right\rangle.\end{gathered}$$ Now thanks to Wick’s theorem this product of many fermion operators can be rewritten as elementary expectation values of two operators through the Pfaffian of some skew-symmetric matrix. Its elements above the diagonal (which is purely made of zeros) are $$\begin{matrix}
\langle A_1(t)B_1(t)\rangle& \langle A_1(t)A_2(t)\rangle&\dots&\langle A_1(t)A_j(0)\rangle\\
&\langle B_1(t)A_2(t)\rangle&\dots&\langle B_1(t)A_j(0)\rangle\\
&&\dots&\dots\\
&&&\langle B_{j-1}(0)A_j(0)\rangle\\
\end{matrix}$$ At finite temperature, $$\langle A_i(t)B_j(0)\rangle = \frac{1}{\mathcal{Z}}\mathrm{Tr}\left[e^{i\mathcal{H}t}A_ie^{-i\mathcal{H}t}B_je^{-\beta\mathcal{H}}\right].$$ The two-body expectation values can be computed going in Fourier space, $$\begin{gathered}
\langle A_i(t)A_j(0)\rangle=\frac{2}{L+1}\sum_k \sin kj \sin ki\\
\left[\cos\varepsilon_k t-i\sin\varepsilon_k t\tanh\frac{\beta\varepsilon_k}{2}\right]\end{gathered}$$ and, $$\begin{gathered}
\langle A_i(t)B_j(0)\rangle=\frac{2}{L+1}\sum_k \sin kj \sin ki\\
\left[-\sin\varepsilon_k t-i\cos\varepsilon_k t\tanh\frac{\beta\varepsilon_k}{2}\right].\end{gathered}$$ And equivalently $\langle B_i(t)B_j(0)\rangle=-\langle A_i(t)A_j(0)\rangle$ as well as $\langle B_i(t)A_j(0)\rangle=-\langle A_i(t)B_j(0)\rangle$.
[^1]: Using this value $g=2.31$ for the g-factor for DTN, together with the most frequently used set of couplings $(D,J_{\rm 1d},J_{\rm 3d})=(8.9,2.2,0.18)$ K yields a second critical field in perfect agreement with the most precise estimates from NMR at $h_{c2}=12.32$ T [@Mukhopadhyay2012; @Blinder2016].
[^2]: ITensor library, <http://itensor.org>
[^3]: See Ref. for TLL parameters dependence on the magnetic field.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We report the direct evidence of field-dependent character of the interaction between individual magnetic skyrmions as well as between skyrmions and edges in B20-type FeGe nanostripes observed by means of high resolution Lorentz transmission electron microscopy. It is shown that above certain critical values of external magnetic field the character of such long-range skyrmion interactions change from attraction to repulsion. Experimentally measured equilibrium inter-skyrmion and skrymion-edge distances as function of applied magnetic field shows quantitative agreement with the results of micromagnetic simulations. Important role of demagnetizing fields and internal symmetry of three-dimensional magnetic skyrmions are discussed in details.'
author:
- 'H. Du'
- 'X. Zhao'
- 'F.N. Rybakov'
- 'A.B. Borisov'
- 'S. Wang'
- 'J. Tang'
- 'C. Jin'
- 'C. Wang'
- 'W. Wei'
- 'N.S. Kiselev[^1]'
- 'Y. Zhang'
- 'R. Che[^2]'
- 'S. Blügel'
- 'M. Tian[^3]'
title: '**Interaction of Individual Skyrmions in Nanostructured Cubic Chiral Magnet**'
---
[2]{}\[\]
Magnetic chiral skyrmions are topological solitons appearing in magnetic crystals with broken inversion symmetry [@Bogdanov_89]. The stability or metastability of such particlelike objects is provided by competition between Heisenberg exchange, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI) and interaction with applied field [@Ivanov; @Dzyaloshinskii; @Moriya; @Bogdanov_1995; @Yu_10; @Nagaosa_Tokura]. Their small size, topological protection and high mobility make them hold great promise as data bit carriers in novel type of magnetic memory and logical elements for spintronics [@Kiselev11; @Fert_13; @Zhang_15(1)]. For the applications as well as for fundamental research, one of the key question concerns the character of skyrmion-skyrmion and skyrmion-edge interactions, which define the equilibrium inter-particle distances and place certain restrictions on the data capacity and ultimate operation speed [@Iwasaki_13; @Sampaio_13; @Zhang_15(2)].
Magnetic skyrmions are also known to be stable in ultra thin films and multilayers with strong perpendicular anisotropy and surface/interface induced DMI [@Romming_15; @Boulle_16]. Such two-dimensional (2D) skyrmions show a long-range interparticle repulsion [@Bogdanov_1995; @Bogdanov_11; @Zhang_15(2)] and share a lot of similarities with magnetic bubble domains in perpendicular anisotropy films/multilayers [@Bobeck_75; @Hubert_98] and the vortices in type-II superconductors [@Stan]. The focus of this work is on the experimental and theoretical study of the inter-skyrmion and skyrmion-edge interactions in cubic chiral magnets with bulk-type DMI.
Contrary to 2D systems, in cubic chiral magnets the skyrmions are inhomogeneous along the film thickness and form the three-dimensional (3D) skyrmion tubes (SkTs) with extra twist at the ends [@Rybakov_13] due to the effect of chiral surface twist [@Meynell_2014]. Moreover, in a wide range of external magnetic field $B_\mathrm{ext}$ the ground state corresponds to a cone phase characterized by chiral modulations of magnetization along $\mathbf{B}_\mathrm{ext}$ and represents non-homogeneous “vacuum” for 3D SkTs. Such SkTs first have been investigated theoretically in [@Rybakov_15] where it was shown that in certain range of parameters the single SkT embedded in the metastable cone phase represents energetically unfavorable state while the global energy minimum corresponds to the lattice of such SkTs. This fact indicates that clumping of 3D SkTs may lead to a significant decrease of the total energy. Later, by means of numerical methods it was established that asymptotic behavior of 3D SkT possess positive energy density with respect to surrounding cone phase [@Leonov_16]. Because of that the inter-particle as well as particle-edge interactions of 3D SkTs should have the character of long-range attraction [@Leonov_APL] which naturally leads to the formation of skyrmion pairs (dimers) and large skyrmion clusters. The observation of such clusters have been reported earlier in nanostructured B20-type FeGe [@Du_15; @Zhao_16] and extended plates of Cu$_{2}$OSeO$_{3}$ [@Muller_PRL; @Loudon_2017].
Fig. \[Fig-1\] shows evolution of skyrmion cluster in a FeGe nanostripe fabricated from bulk crystal with the method described in [@Jin_17]. [The characterization of such samples with Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy shows that typical thickness variation does not excised 3% [@Wang_2017]. ]{} At low field the skyrmions preferentially assemble near the edges and with increasing field they migrate to the middle part of the stripe without noticeable lost of their long-range order, compare Fig. \[Fig-1\](a) and (b). One has to note that an assumption of the presence of the strong pining centers which in general can be considered as an alternative explanation for skyrmion clustering, in fact, is not supported by our observations which clearly show a high mobility of the SkTs (Fig. \[Fig-1\](b),(c)) under the action of varied magnetc field even at relatively low temperature $T\sim100$ K. Moreover, in Section \[Jumps\] we describe another interesting phenomenon of spontaneous leaps of single skyrmion between the two positions, indicating a high mobility of SkTs activated by elevating the temperature to 150 K (see also [@suppl]). At high $B_\mathrm{ext}$=484 mT, the long-range order in skyrmion cluster is violated while the skyrmions aggregate near the middle line of the stripe (Fig. \[Fig-1\](c)).
{width="7cm"}
On a qualitative level, the attractive skyrmion-skyrmion interaction can be a good explanation for these observations at low field and the violation of the long-range order at high field may serve as an indicator that the character of the inter-skyrmion as well as skyrmion-edge interaction changes from attraction to repulsion. Nevertheless, it is well known that even purely repulsive particles can form the clusters and clumps [@Klein; @Glaser]. Thereby, the clustering itself is not sufficient argument in favor of the hypothesis of long-range inter-skyrmion attraction.
{width="17cm"}
In order to reveal the genuine character of skyrmion interactions one has to go beyond the collective phenomena and study the isolated skyrmion pairs. Besides that an adequate theoretical model for skyrmion interactions must be in a quantitative agreement with experimental data which in turn requires taking into account the effects of stray field (dipole-dipole interaction) which is always naturally present. Such long-range interaction is known to be significant in such a systems [@Shibata_2017], but was ignored in earlier studies on skyrmion interactions [@Leonov_16; @Leonov_APL; @Muller_PRL; @Loudon_2017]. In the following, we present a complementary experimental and theoretical results unambiguously revealing the details of the inter-skyrmion and skyrmion-edge interactions.
Fig. \[Fig-2\] shows field-driven evolution of two pairs of SkTs at increasing (a)-(f) and decreasing $B_\mathrm{ext}$ (g)-(l) in the nanostripe. We measured the field dependence of equilibrium inter-skyrmion and skyrmion-edge distances and identified the critical value of $B_\mathrm{ext}$, above which the SkTs start to weakly repel each other. The initial state with reduced number of SkTs, Fig. \[Fig-2\](a) has been achieved via the control of the number of helical spirals in the nanostripe which in turn can be adjusted during the demagnetization process. As has been revealed in our earlier experiments, at low temperatures, each period of the helix converges to one single SkT by increasing $B_\mathrm{ext}$ [@Du_15]. At $B_\mathrm{ext}\!=\!255$ mT, two pairs of skyrmions are positioned near the edge of the sample on the large distance, thus the interaction between pairs is negligible. Up to the magnetic field $\sim 400$ mT, the nearest skyrmion-skyrmion distance, $d_\mathrm{ss}$, remains almost unchanged, (a)-(d), but in the range from 400 mT to 500 mT, it increases abruptly, (e)-(f). In contrast to $d_\mathrm{ss}$, the skyrmion-edge distance, $d_\mathrm{se}$, increases gradually at small $B_\mathrm{ext}$ (a)-(c), and start to increases abruptly above 350 mT. At a higher $B_\mathrm{ext}\!\sim\!500$ mT, the skyrmions are distributed in the middle of the nanostripe and show very weak variation in their positions with farther increasing field up to the collapse. The observed behavior clearly demonstrates that the character of inter-skyrmion interaction can be switched from strong attractive at low field to weakly repulsive at high $B_\mathrm{ext}$. The above-discussed behavior of skyrmions is well reproduced (a complete field-driven motion of skyrmion is shown in Video2 [@suppl]), and is almost unchanged when the sample is tilted with respect to the plane normal up to 5$^\circ$ (see Section \[TiltedField\]).
An important feature of the field-driven evolution of inert-skyrmion and skyrmion-edge distances is its fully reversibility. Otherwise, possible explanation would be the presence of the pinning centers which obstruct skyrmions to run away from one another. With decreasing $B_\mathrm{ext}$ down to 408 mT (Fig. \[Fig-2\](h)), the $d_\mathrm{ss}$ of the bottom pair is significantly decreased which indicates the appearance of attractive interaction again. It is seen that the top pair of particles has been severed due to the attraction acting on each skyrmion from the side of the opposite edges of the sample. With further decreasing of the field, all SkTs move close to the edge and form either paired state or remain isolated (i)-(k). It is worth paying attention to the relatively large distance between single SkT and pair of SkTs on the left side of the sample at 266 mT (Fig. \[Fig-2\](k)). Despite the extremely large distance between them, these three skyrmions form a chain when the $B_\mathrm{ext}$ further reduces down to 193 mT (Fig. \[Fig-2\](l)), suggesting that SkTs are able to attract each other on the distances much larger than the characteristic size of the skyrmions, $L_\mathrm{D}$.
This attractive interactions can be well understood in the following way. At low magnetic field, the isolated skyrmion is surrounded by the cone phase, giving rise to nontrivial 3D SkT (Fig. \[Fig-3\](a)). When two of such inhomogeneous SkTs approach each other, the mutual volume of the pair turns to be smaller than the total volume of two isolated SkTs (Fig. \[Fig-3\](b)). Accordingly, the total energy of such coupled state with respect to the energy of the cone phase becomes lower and make the coupled SkTs being energetically more favorable than two isolated SkTs. However, too small distance between two SkTs leads to an additional distortion of the spins configuration of the two SkTs, which are energetically unfavorable. The competitions of this two effects: i) reduction of the total volume occupied by the coupled two SkTs and ii) distortion of isolated SkTs, results in an equilibrium inter-skyrmion distance with Lennard-Jones like potential of interparticle interaction [@Leonov_16]. Moreover, a strict mathematical analysis of the basic model of isotropic chiral magnet revealed that the spin texture of isolated SkT appearing as an excitation on the background of the conical phase has hidden symmetry. The later means that without any loss of generality the exact solution for isolated translationally invariant SkT, as shown in Fig. \[Fig-3\](a), can be obtained via special 2D model Hamiltonian, for details see Section \[BasicModel\]. This solution corresponds to a 2D “oblique” skyrmion (similar to the texture of the pair of half lumps in easy plane baby Skyrme model [@JS_2010] and skyrmions in tilted magnetic field [@Lin; @Leonov_Neel_sk]), as shown in Fig. \[Fig-3\](c), in ferromagnetic background inclined by angle $\theta_\mathrm{cone}$ with respect to $\mathbf{B}_\mathrm{ext}$ corresponding to equilibrium angle of conical phase. The complete spin texture of 3D SkT is then followed from analytical mapping based on affine transformation. Although in films of finite thickness the additional twists of magnetization arise near the surfaces [@Rybakov_13], the underlying part of the tube preserves aforementioned symmetry. The presence of another SkT in the system in turn breaks this symmetry, as well illustrated by means of overlapping isosurfaces of two SkTs in Fig. \[Fig-3\](b) and (d). The line which connects the cores can not be preserved under the affine transformation. Coupled SkTs can be considered as one object which is also a skyrmionic solution with higher topological charge.
{width="16cm"}
To validate experimentally observed behaviors, we performed micromagnetic simulations by means of MuMax3 [@MuMax3] for the realistic specimen geometry (see Section \[Micromag\]). The theoretical curves in Fig. \[Fig-3\](e),(f) are in a very good qualitative and quantitative agreement with experimental data. For the critical fields $B_\mathrm{se}\!\sim\!420$ mT and $B_\mathrm{ss}\!\sim510\!$ mT the corresponding theoretical dependencies for $d_\mathrm{se}$ and $d_\mathrm{ss}$ tends to infinity which reflects the change in the character of interactions from attractive to repulsive. It happens because at strong $B_\mathrm{ext}$ the cone phase reaches the saturation which means that the “vacuum” surrounding SkTs become field-polarized and isotropic. The SkTs in such ferromagnetic background possessing radially symmetric structure behave identically to skyrmions in 2D system and always repel each other [@Bogdanov_1995]. Thereby, the measured value of critical field $B_\mathrm{ss}$ also can be thought as the saturation field for conical phase.
It is important to note the difference between the values of critical fields $B_\mathrm{se}$ and $B_\mathrm{ss}$. As follows from experimental and theoretical dependencies presented in Fig. \[Fig-3\](e),(f) $B_\mathrm{se}\!<\!B_\mathrm{ss}$ meaning that skyrmion-edge interaction changes its character to repulsive at significantly lower field compare to inter-skyrmion interaction. For $B_\mathrm{se}\!<\!B_\mathrm{ext}\!<\!B_\mathrm{ss}$ SkTs form clusters far from the edges in the center of the sample. This agrees with recently observed effect of skyrmion clustering in the center of the FeGe plate [@Zheng_17]. In order to reveal the nature of this effect we performed comparative calculation for $d_\mathrm{se}$ and $d_\mathrm{ss}$ where we ignore the energy contribution of demagnetizing field (Fig. \[Fig-3\](g)). Besides the significant reduction of absolute values of $B_\mathrm{se}$ and $B_\mathrm{ss}$, which reflect important role of demagnetizing fields for quantitative agreement one can clearly see that the dependencies for $d_\mathrm{se}$ and $d_\mathrm{ss}$ tend to infinity at the same critical field, $B_\mathrm{se}=B_\mathrm{ss}$. The latter means that the effect of skyrmion clustering in the center of the sample reflects strong influence of demagnetizing fields. Both $d_\mathrm{se}$ and $d_\mathrm{ss}$ exhibit nearly constant value above critical field. Such saturation occurs because the energy contribution of weak inhomogeneities, thermal fluctuations etc. becomes comparable or even exceeds the repulsive inter-skyrmion forces which are exponentially small at large distances. In the simulations the saturation of of $d_\mathrm{se}$ and $d_\mathrm{ss}$ is mainly caused by finite precision of numerical calculations. All aforementioned effects are also observed in large size samples (see Section \[LargePlate\]) and can be well explained in terms of forces of inter-skyrmion and skyrmion-edge interactions and their dependences on external magnetic field provided in Section \[Forces\].
In summary, we present first experimental evidence for Lennard-Jones type interaction between individual skyrmions revealed by direct observation of reversible field-driven evolution of interparticle equilibrium distances. In a good agreement with results of micromagnetic simulations, it is shown that with increasing field the character of long-range skyrmion interactions changes from attractive to repulsive. Finally, it is worth to emphasize that the revealed mechanism of attractive interaction for 3D skyrmions is completely different from other systems such as for instance frustrated 2D magnets [@Rozsa] or type-1.5 superconductors [@Babaev].
Acknowledgments {#acknowledgments .unnumbered}
===============
The authors would like to thank E. Babaev for helpful discussions. This work was supported by the National Key R$\&$D Program of China, Grant No. 2017YFA0303201, the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS, Grant No. QYZDB-SSW-SLH009, the Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant No. 51622105, 11474290, [the Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, KJZD-SW-M01, the Major/Innovative Program of Development Foundation of Hefei Center for Physical Science and Technology, Grand No. 2016FXCX001]{} and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS No. 2015267. The work of F.N.R. was supported by the Swedish Research Council Grant No. 642-2013-7837 and by Göran Gustafsson Foundation for Research in Natural Sciences and Medicine. The research of A.B.B. was carried out within the state assignment of FASO of Russia (theme “Quantum” No. 01201463332).
[99]{}
A.N. Bogdanov and D.A. Yablonskii, [Sov. Phys. JETP **68**, 101 (1989)](http://www.jetp.ac.ru/cgi-bin/e/index/e/68/1/p101?a=list).
B.A. Ivanov, V.A. Stephanovich and A.A. Zhmudskii, [J. Magn. Magn. Mater. **88**, 116 (1990)](http://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(97)90021-4).
I. Dzyaloshinsky, [J. Phys. Chem. Solids **4**, 241 (1958)](http://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(58)90076-3).
T. Moriya, [Phys. Rev. **120**, 91 (1960)](http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.120.91).
A. Bogdanov, [JETP Lett. **62**, 247 (1995)](http://jetpletters.ac.ru/ps/1214/article_18359.shtml).
X.Z. Yu, et al. [Nature **465**, 901 (2010)](http://doi.org/10.1038/nature09124).
N. Nagaosa & Y. Tokura, [Nat. Nanotechnol. **8**, 899 (2013)](http://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.243).
N.S. Kiselev, A.N. Bogdanov, R. Schäfer & U.K. Rö[ß]{}ler, [J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. **44**, 392001 (2011)](http://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/44/39/392001).
A. Fert, V. Cros & J. Sampaio, [Nat. Nanotechnol. **8**, 152 (2013)](http://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.29).
X. Zhang, M. Ezawa & Y. Zhou, [Sci. Rep. **5**, 9400 (2015)](http://doi.org/10.1038/srep09400).
J. Iwasaki, M. Mochizuki & N. Nagaosa, [Nat. Nanotechnol. **8**, 742 (2013)](http://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.176).
J. Sampaio, V. Cros, S. Rohart, A. Thiaville & A. Fert, [Nat. Nanotechnol. **8**, 839 (2013)](http://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.210).
X. Zhang, et al. [Sci. Rep. **5**, 7643 (2015)](http://doi.org/10.1038/srep07643).
N. Romming, A. Kubetzka, C. Hanneken, K. von Bergmann & R. Wiesendanger, [Phys. Rev. Lett. **114**, 177203 (2015)](http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.177203).
O. Boulle, et al. [Nat. Nanotechnol. **11**, 449 (2016)](http://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.315).
U.K. Rö[ß]{}ler, A.A. Leonov & A.N. Bogdanov, [J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. **303**, 012105 (2011)](http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/303/1/012105).
A.H. Bobeck, E. Della Torre, *Magnetic domain walls in bubble materials* (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979).
A. Hubert, R. Schäfer, *Magnetic Domains* (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998).
G. Stan, S.B. Field, J.M. Martinis, [Phys. Rev. Lett. **92**, 097003 (2004)](http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.097003).
F.N. Rybakov, A.B. Borisov & A.N. Bogdanov, [Phys. Rev. B **87**, 094424 (2013)](http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.094424).
S.A. Meynell, M.N. Wilson, H. Fritzsche, A.N. Bogdanov & T.L. Monchesky, [Phys. Rev. B **90**, 014406 (2014)](http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.014406).
F.N. Rybakov, A.B. Borisov, S. Blügel & N.S. Kiselev, [Phys. Rev. Lett. **115**, 117201 (2015)](http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.117201).
A.O. Leonov, T.L. Monchesky, J.C. Loudon & A.N. Bogdanov, [J. Phys.: Condens. Matter **28**, 35LT01 (2016)](http://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/28/35/35LT01).
A.O. Leonov, J.C. Loudon & A.N. Bogdanov, [Appl. Phys. Lett. **109**, 172404 (2016)](http://doi.org/10.1063/1.4965981).
H. Du, et al. [Nat. Commun. **6**, 8504 (2015)](http://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9504).
X. Zhao, et al. [Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. **113**, 4819 (2016)](http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1600197113).
J. Müller, et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. **119**, 137201 (2017)](http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.137201).
J.C. Loudon, A.O. Leonov, A.N. Bogdanov, M. Ciomaga Hatnean & G. Balakrishnan, [Phys. Rev. B **97**, 134403 (2018)](http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.134403).
C. Jin, et al. [Nat. Commun. **8**, 15569 (2017)](http://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15569).
C. Wang, et al. [Nano Lett. **17**, 2921 (2017)](http://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00135).
See [****](http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmdEV7vxE-zAhWXyS4-o5RA) for jumps of skyrmion (Video1) and field-driven motion of skyrmions (Video2). [http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmdEV7vxE-zAhWXyS4-o5RA]{}
W. Klein, H. Gould, R.A. Ramos, I. Clejan, A.I. Mel’cuk, [Physica A **205**, 738 (1994)](http://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4371(94)90233-X).
M.A. Glaser, et al. [Europhys. Lett. **78**, 46004 (2007)](http://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/78/46004).
K. Shibata, et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. **118**, 087202 (2017)](http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.087202).
J. Jäykkä & M. Speight, [Phys. Rev. D **82**, 125030 (2010)](http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.125030).
S.-Z. Lin & A. Saxena, [Phys. Rev. B **92**, 180401(R) (2015)](http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.180401).
A.O. Leonov & I. Kézsmárki, [Phys. Rev. B **96**, 214413 (2017)](http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.214413).
A. Vansteenkiste, et al. [AIP Adv. **4**, 107133 (2014)](http://doi.org/10.1063/1.4899186).
F. Zheng, et al. [arXiv:1706.04654v1 (2017)](http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.04654).
L. Rózsa, et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. **117**, 157205 (2016)](http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.157205).
E. Babaev & M. Speight, [Phys. Rev. B **72**, 180502(R) (2005)](http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.180502).
\[app\]
Jumps of skyrmion {#Jumps}
=================
Fig. \[Fig-Jumps\] illustrates an interesting phenomenon of spontaneous leap of single skyrmion between the two intermediate sites relative to the chain of skyrmions at rest. This phenomenon clearly indicates high mobility of SkTs as well as that the skyrmion chain attached to the edge provides potential energy pits for individual SkT moving along such a chain.
![Field-driven evolution of skyrmions in a square shape FeGe plate with the thickness $\sim120$ nm and transversal dimensions of $\sim\,1.5$ $\mu$m. (a)-(f) represent images for increasing filed and (g)-(i) are images for decreasing field. All images have been taken at temperature $T\!=\!100$ K in over-focus regime with defocus distance a focused value $\sim\,400$ $\mu$m. []{data-label="Fig-Big"}](supFig-jumps-o.pdf){width="100.00000%"}
![Field-driven evolution of skyrmions in a square shape FeGe plate with the thickness $\sim120$ nm and transversal dimensions of $\sim\,1.5$ $\mu$m. (a)-(f) represent images for increasing filed and (g)-(i) are images for decreasing field. All images have been taken at temperature $T\!=\!100$ K in over-focus regime with defocus distance a focused value $\sim\,400$ $\mu$m. []{data-label="Fig-Big"}](supFig-big-o.pdf){width="100.00000%"}
Large size square plate {#LargePlate}
=======================
The experiment on large size square plate, Fig. \[Fig-Big\], has been performed with the aim to illustrate few different aspects of the skyrmion interactions problem.
First, it shows reproducibility of the effect of reversal switching of the character of skyrmion interactions with magnetic field for large size samples. It is clearly shows that the equilibrium distance between skyrmions increase gradually with the applied filed, Fig. \[Fig-Big\](a)-(f) and reduces back to initial distances with the reduction of applied field, Fig. \[Fig-Big\](g)-(i).
Second, presented images clearly illustrate effect of saturation of the inter-skyrmion and skyrmion-edge distances and presence of critical distances on which skyrmions may still interact with each other and with the modulations at the edges of the sample. In particular, in ideal system above critical field at which skyrmion-edge interaction acquires a pure repulsive character it is expected thate skyrmions will appear in the center of the domain due to the repulsion actin from each edge of the sample. In real system, however, the center of the domain remain unoccupied by skyrmions, which can be explained by the existence of the critical distance above which the repulsive forces acting on the skyrmions from the edges become negligibly small in comparison to weak thermal fluctuations and different pinning effects. Another clear evidence of this effect is the fact that some skyrmions which appear at large distances from the edges during the increasing field remains on their positions and can not be attracted by edges because of large distances between them, compare Fig. \[Fig-Big\](a) and (i).
Tilted magnetic field {#TiltedField}
=====================
In Lorentz TEM experiment small angle tilt of the sample is used for reduction of the diffraction effect. Typical value of such tilt angle with respect to plane normal does not exceed 2$^\circ$. In this regime and up to the tilt angle of $\sim\,5^\circ$ we have found no significant changes in the skyrmions behavior discussed in the main text. Significant difference has been observed only when the tilting angle approaches value of $\sim\,15^\circ$. However, this case goes beyond the scope of current work and will be discussed elsewhere.
Analysis of the basic model {#BasicModel}
===========================
Let us consider the basic model of isotropic chiral magnet [@Bar; @Bak] defined with the following model Hamiltonian in 3D space: $$\begin{aligned}
\mathcal{H}_0 = \int \Big( \mathcal{E}\{\mathbf{m}\} \Big) \mathrm{d}x\mathrm{d}y\mathrm{d}z, \quad
\mathcal{E}\{\mathbf{m}\} = \mathcal{A} \sum_{i=x,y,z} ( \mathbf{grad}\,m_i )^2
+ \mathcal{D}\, \mathbf{m}\!\cdot\! [\nabla\! \times \! \mathbf{m}] - M_\mathrm{s} B_\mathrm{ext} m_{z},
\label{E_3D}\end{aligned}$$ where $\mathbf{m} \equiv \mathbf{m}(x,y,z)$ is a unit ($\mathbf{m}=\mathbf{M}/M_\mathrm{s}$) continuous vector field, $M_\mathrm{s}$ is the magnetization of the material, $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{D}$ are the micromagnetic constants for exchange and DMI, respectively. We established that in case of bulk approach both axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric isolated skyrmion can be found as exact solution of the following special 2D Hamiltonian: $$\begin{aligned}
\mathcal{H}\!=\!\int\!\Bigg(\mathcal{E}\{\mathbf{n}\} - \rho\,(n_x^2\!+\!n_y^2) + \rho\,\Big(y\frac{\partial\mathbf{n}}{\partial x} - x\frac{\partial\mathbf{n}}{\partial y}\Big)^2\Bigg) \mathrm{d}x\mathrm{d}y,
\label{E_2D}\end{aligned}$$ where $\rho\!=\!\mathcal{D}^2/(4\mathcal{A})$ and unit vector field $\mathbf{n}\equiv\mathbf{n}(x,y)\!=\!\mathbf{m}(x,y,0)$. The texture $\mathbf{n}$ reproduce field $\mathbf{m}$ by coordinated global and local rotations dependent on $z$-coordinate: $$\begin{aligned}
&\mathbf{m}(x,y,z) =
\begin{pmatrix}
\cos(k z) & -\sin(k z) & 0 \\
\sin(k z) & \cos(k z) & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 1
\end{pmatrix} \mathbf{n}( x^\prime, y^\prime ), \label{symmetry} \\
&x^\prime\!=\!x \cos(k z) + y \sin(k z),\quad y^\prime\!=\!y \cos(k z) - x \sin(k z), \nonumber\end{aligned}$$ where $k=2\pi/L_\mathrm{D}$, cone period $L_\mathrm{D}=4\pi \mathcal{A}/\mathcal{D}$ [@Bogdanov_11]. For the values of $B_\mathrm{ext}$ less than saturation field $B_\mathrm{D}\!=\!\mathcal{D}^2/(2M_s\mathcal{A})$ [@Bogdanov_11] variational equations for (\[E\_2D\]) gives trivial solution $n_z\!=\!B_\mathrm{ext}/B_\mathrm{D}\!=\!\cos(\theta_\mathrm{cone})$ describing the cone phase.
The spin texture of isolated SkT appearing as an excitation on background of such conical phase has hidden symmetry (\[symmetry\]). The presence of another SkT in the system breaks this symmetry because the line, which connects the cores of skyrmions can not be preserved under the affine transformation underlying Eq. (\[symmetry\]).
Micromagnetic simulations {#Micromag}
=========================
In nano structured samples the interaction of magnetization with demagnetizing fields $\mathbf{B}_\mathrm{d}$ generated by divergence of magnetization at the boundaries and in the volume of the sample became important for quantitative description [@Shibata_2017]. In the simulations, we consider the following energy functional: $$\begin{aligned}
E\!=\!\int_V \Big(
\mathcal{A} \sum_{i=x,y,z} ( \mathbf{grad}\,m_i )^2
+ \mathcal{D}\, \mathbf{m}\!\cdot\! [\nabla\! \times \! \mathbf{m}] \Big.
\Big. - M_\mathrm{s} B_\mathrm{ext} m_{z} -
\frac{1}{2}\, M_\mathrm{s}\, \mathbf{B}_\mathrm{d} \cdot \mathbf{m}
\Big)\mathrm{d}x\mathrm{d}y\mathrm{d}z.
\label{E_tot}\end{aligned}$$ We use typical value for saturation magnetization for FeGe $M_\mathrm{s}\!=\!384$ kAm$^{-1}$ and the DMI constant defined via equation for equilibrium period of helicoid [@helix; @Bogdanov_11; @Beg_15]: $\mathcal{D}\!=\!4\pi\mathcal{A}/L_\mathrm{D}$. The exchange stiffness constant $\mathcal{A}$ has been found from the fit of experimentally measured dependencies for $d_\mathrm{se}$ and $d_\mathrm{ss}$. We changed $\mathcal{A}$ in range $[2.0 - 9.0]$ pJm$^{-1}$ with the step of 0.25 pJm$^{-1}$. We have found the best fit to experimental dependencies with $\mathcal{A}\!=\!3.25$ pJm$^{-1}$. The mesh of the simulated domain was 128$\times$384$\times$64 cells. Fig. \[Fig-Sup\](a) show an initial state at $B_\mathrm{ext}\!=\!200$ mT, which was archived by energy minimization of homogeneously magnetized plate with imposed pair of SkTs. At each value of $B_\mathrm{ext}$ varying from 200 mT to 600 mT with the step of 25 mT, full energy minimization with a conjugate gradient method has been performed.
![ (a) Size and shape of simulated domain with color code showing magnetization distribution in initial state at $B_\mathrm{ext}\!=\!200$ mT. (b) Equilibrium magnetization distribution averaged over the thickness of the plate shown for different applied fields. []{data-label="Fig-Sup"}](supFig-simul-o.pdf){width="16cm"}
Estimation of conservative and restoring forces {#Forces}
===============================================
{width="9cm"}
From simulations performed with MuMax3 we estimate that binding energy $U$ of skyrmions (i.e. the difference between the total energy of two isolated skyrmions and energy of their bound state) in the first approximation has linear depends on the applied field: $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{\partial U } {\partial B_\mathrm{ext}} \approx -k,\end{aligned}$$ where $k \approx 7\times 10^{-18}$ JT$^{-1}$. The same is true for skyrmion-edge binding energy and calculations gives approximately the same value for the coefficient $k$. The corresponding conservative force is $$\begin{aligned}
F = - \frac{\partial U } {\partial d} =
- \frac{\partial U } {\partial B_\mathrm{ext}} \left( \frac{\partial d} {{\partial B_\mathrm{ext}}} \right)^{-1}
\approx
k \left( \frac{\partial d} {{\partial B_\mathrm{ext}}} \right)^{-1} .\end{aligned}$$ One simple mechanical analogy explaining the physical meaning of conservative force is vertical spring pendulum, where the analog of force $F$ is the tension of the spring in an equilibrium state and the analog of external magnetic field $B_\mathrm{ext}$ is gravitation.
Comparing the slopes for dependencies in Fig. \[Fig-3\](e),(f) for fixed $B_\mathrm{ext}$ values one can see that at high magnetic field inter-skyrmion force is stronger than that for skyrmion-edge interaction while the order of magnitude for both forces is $\sim\, 10^{-11}$ N.
Alternative approach to estimate skyrmion interaction forces from above is based on calculation of maximum forces. For that, first we found approximate potential for the inter-skyrmion and skyrmion-edge energies following the approach used in [@Leonov_16], but applied it to micromagnetic functional (\[E\_tot\]) taking into account stray field energy term and materials parameters given in Section \[Micromag\]. All calculations discussed below has been performed for very wide plate of chiral magnet with the size of $1\mu$m$\times 1\mu$m, thickness 120 nm and discretization mesh of 256$\times$256$\times$64 cells. The periodical boundary conditions have been set along $x$-axis only for skyrmion-edge interaction and along both $x$- and $y$-axis for inter-skyrmion interaction. An external magnetic field is pointing along positive direction of $z$-axis. In order to fix the position of skyrmions the magnetization of certain cuboids of discretized mesh coinciding with the main axis of skyrmion tube has been excluded from minimization via the MuMax3 build-in function “frozenspins()”. For each fixed magnetic field we were changing the position of skyrmions in initial state and position of fixed magnetization cuboids respectively and then the full energy minimization were performed for each of configurations. The energies of the skyrmion pair as function of the distance between skyrmions is shown in Fig. \[Fig-potencial\](a) for different values of applied field. The energy of a single skyrmion as function of the distance to the free edge of the stripe is shown in Fig. \[Fig-potencial\](c). The corresponding forces restoring skyrmion to its equilibrium position ($F\,=\,0$) are shown in Fig. \[Fig-potencial\](b) and (d). Maximal value of such inter-skyrmion and skyrmion-edge forces are shown in inset of Fig. \[Fig-potencial\](d). Such estimation of the forces acting on the skyrmion are in a good agreement with estimation of conservative forces discuses above in this section. As follows from the dependencies $F_\mathrm{max}(B_\mathrm{ext})$, the skyrmion-edge force $F_\mathrm{se}$ dominates over inter-skyrmion forces $F_\mathrm{ss}$ at low magnetic field. In a good agreement with the conclusions given in the main text of the manuscript $F_\mathrm{se}$ converges to zero and change its sign at field $\sim\,0.45$ T while $F_\mathrm{ss}$ change its sign (possessing repulsive character) at slightly higher field $\sim\,0.55$ T. One has to emphasize that the direct comparison of absolute values of conservative forces discussed above and maximal restoring forces calculated from the energy profiles, strictly speaking, has no meaning because two type of forces have different physical meaning. Moreover, due to artificial distortions introduced by fixed (frozen) magnetization in certain positions of the simulated domain the estimate of restoring forces has much less precision. On the other hand, a precise estimate of conservative forces requires double precision (64 bits) of numerical solver, while publicly available version of MuMax3 at the moment allows the precision only up to single-precision floating-point format (32 bits).
[99]{}
V.G. Bar’yakhtar, E.P. Stefanovsky, Fiz. Tverd. Tela **11**, 1946 (1969) \[Sov. Phys. Solid State **11**, 1566 (1970)\].
P. Bak, M.H. Jensen, [J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. **13**, L881 (1980)](http://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/13/31/002).
M. Beg, et al. [Sci. Rep. **5**, 17137 (2015)](http://doi.org/10.1038/srep17137).
I.E. Dzyaloshinskii, Sov. Phys. JETP **20**, 665 (1965).
[^1]: [email protected]
[^2]: [email protected]
[^3]: [email protected]
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'The logarithmic capacity (also called Chebyshev constant or transfinite diameter) of two real intervals $[-1,\alpha]\cup[\beta,1]$ has been given explicitly with the help of Jacobi’s elliptic and theta functions already by Achieser in 1930. By proving several inequalities for these elliptic and theta functions, an upper bound for the logarithmic capacity in terms of elementary functions of $\alpha$ and $\beta$ is derived.'
author:
- 'Klaus Schiefermayr[^1]'
bibliography:
- 'UpperBoundCapacity.bib'
title: 'An Upper Bound for the Logarithmic Capacity of Two Intervals[^2]'
---
*Mathematics Subject Classification (2000):* 33E05, 31A15
*Keywords:* Chebyshev constant, Logarithmic capacity, Jacobi’s elliptic functions, Jacobi’s theta functions, Transfinite diameter, Two intervals
Introduction
============
Let $C$ be a compact set in the complex plane and let ${\mathbb P}_n$ be the set of all polynomials of degree less or equal $n$. Then $L_n(C)$, defined by $$\label{Ln}
L_n(C):=\inf_{p_{n-1}\in{\mathbb P}_{n-1}}\sup_{z\in{C}}|z^n-p_{n-1}(z)|,$$ is usually called the *minimum deviation* of degree $n$ on $C$. The *logarithmic capacity* (or *Chebyshev constant*) of $C$ is then defined by the limit $${{\operatorname{cap}}}(C):=\lim_{n\to\infty}\root{n}\of{L_n(C)}.$$ The logarithmic capacity of $C$ can be given in a completely different way by $${{\operatorname{cap}}}(C)=\lim_{n\to\infty}\sup_{z_i,z_j\in{C}}
\Bigl(\prod_{1\leq{i}<j\leq{n}}|z_i-z_j|\Bigr)^{\frac{2}{n(n-1)}}$$ and, in this connection, is also called the *transfinite diameter*. For further reading and weighted analogues concerning this constant, see [@MhaskarSaff].
In this paper, we consider the case of two intervals, i.e., $$\label{C}
C={C_{\alpha,\beta}}:=[-1,\alpha]\cup[\beta,1], \quad -1<\alpha<\beta<1.$$ The logarithmic capacity of two intervals ${C_{\alpha,\beta}}$ can only be given with the help of Jacobi’s elliptic and theta functions (see Theorem\[Theorem\_Achieser\]). The purpose of this paper is to give an upper bound for ${{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})$ in terms of elementary functions of $\alpha$ and $\beta$.
Let $K\equiv{K}(k)$ and $E\equiv{E}(k)$ be the complete elliptic integral of the first and second kind, respectively, where $0<k<1$ is known as the modulus of $K$ and $E$. Let $k':=\sqrt{1-k^2}$, $K'\equiv{K}'(k):=K(k')$, and let ${{\operatorname{sn}}}(u)\equiv{{\operatorname{sn}}}(u,k)$, ${{\operatorname{cn}}}(u)\equiv{{\operatorname{cn}}}(u,k)$, ${{\operatorname{dn}}}(u)\equiv{{\operatorname{dn}}}(u,k)$ be Jacobi’s elliptic functions with respect to the modulus $k$. Further, let $\Theta(u)\equiv\Theta(u,k)$, $H(u)\equiv H(u,k)$, $H_1(u)\equiv{H}_1(u,k)$ and $\Theta_1(u)\equiv\Theta_1(u,k)$ be the four theta functions of Jacobi (old notation).
Further, we need Jacobi’s zeta function ${{\operatorname{zn}}}(u)\equiv{{\operatorname{zn}}}(u,k)$ given by $${{\operatorname{zn}}}(u)=\int_{0}^{u}{{\operatorname{dn}}}^2(v)\,{{\operatorname{d}}}{v}-\frac{u\,E}{K}=\frac{\Theta'(u)}{\Theta(u)}.$$
For the definitions and many important properties of these functions see, e.g., [@ByrdFriedman], [@Lawden], [@MagnusOberhettingerSoni chapterX] or [@WhittakerWatson].
A formula for the logarithmic capacity of two intervals in terms of Jacobi’s elliptic and theta functions has been derived by N.I.Achieser[@Achieser-1930]. For the background of [@Achieser-1930] and some related results, see [@Zolotarev1], [@Zolotarev2], [@Achieser-1929], [@Achieser-1932], [@Peh1995], and [@PehSch].
\[Theorem\_Achieser\] Let ${C_{\alpha,\beta}}:=[-1,\alpha]\cup[\beta,1]$, $-1<\alpha<\beta<1$, let the modulus $k$, $0<k<1$, be given by $$\label{k}
k^2:=\frac{2(\beta-\alpha)}{(1-\alpha)(1+\beta)}$$ and let $0<\lambda<1$ be such that $$\label{sn}
{{\operatorname{sn}}}^2({\lambda{K}})=\frac{1-\alpha}{2}.$$ Then $$\label{cap1}
{{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})=\frac{\Theta^4(0)}{2\,{{\operatorname{dn}}}^2({\lambda{K}})\Theta^4({\lambda{K}})}=\frac{2{k'}^2K^2}{\pi^2{{\operatorname{dn}}}^2({\lambda{K}})\Theta^4({\lambda{K}})}.$$
The problem in operating with formula is the difficult connection of the modulus $k$ and the parameter $\lambda$ with the values $\alpha$ and $\beta$ via formulae and , where the modulus $k$ appear both in the term $K\equiv{K}(k)$ and as the parameter of the elliptic function ${{\operatorname{sn}}}(u)\equiv{{\operatorname{sn}}}(u,k)$. With the help of some inequalities and monotonicity properties of Jacobi’s elliptic and theta functions given and proved in Section3, we are able to prove an upper bound for ${{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})$ in terms of elementary functions of $\alpha$ and $\beta$ in Section2. Concluding this section, we collect some useful properties of $\alpha$ and $\beta$ (as functions of $k$ and $\lambda$) and of the capacity ${{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})$ in the following remark.
1. By and , $$\label{cndn}
{{\operatorname{cn}}}^2({\lambda{K}})=\frac{1+\alpha}{2},\quad{{\operatorname{dn}}}^2({\lambda{K}})=\frac{1+\alpha}{1+\beta}$$ and $$\label{k'}
{k'}^2=\frac{(1+\alpha)(1-\beta)}{(1-\alpha)(1+\beta)}.$$
2. By and , there is a one-to-one correspondence between $\{\alpha,\beta\}$, $-1<\alpha<\beta<1$, and $\{k,\lambda\}$, $0<k<1$, $0<\lambda<1$. Moreover, for $\alpha\equiv\alpha(k,\lambda)$ and $\beta\equiv\beta(k,\lambda)$, we get $$\label{AlphaBeta}
\begin{aligned}
\alpha(k,\lambda)&=1-2\,{{\operatorname{sn}}}^2(\lambda{K}),\\
\beta(k,\lambda)&=\frac{2\,{{\operatorname{cn}}}^2(\lambda{K})}{{{\operatorname{dn}}}^2(\lambda{K})}-1=2\,{{\operatorname{sn}}}^2((1+\lambda)K)-1.
\end{aligned}$$
3. Let $0<k<1$ be fixed. By , both, $\alpha(k,\lambda)$ and $\beta(k,\lambda)$, are strictly monotone decreasing functions of $\lambda$ with $$\lim_{\lambda\to0}\alpha(k,\lambda)=\lim_{\lambda\to0}\beta(k,\lambda)=1,\quad
\lim_{\lambda\to1}\alpha(k,\lambda)=\lim_{\lambda\to1}\beta(k,\lambda)=-1.$$
4. Let $0<\lambda<1$ be fixed. By and [@CarlsonTodd Sect.1 & 4], $\alpha(k,\lambda)$ and $\beta(k,\lambda)$ is a strictly monotone decreasing and increasing function of $k$, respectively. Moreover, $$\lim_{k\to0}\alpha(k,\lambda)=\lim_{k\to0}\beta(k,\lambda)=\cos(\lambda\pi),\quad
-\lim_{k\to1}\alpha(k,\lambda)=\lim_{k\to1}\beta(k,\lambda)=1,$$ i.e., for the limiting case $k\to0$, we get ${C_{\alpha,\beta}}\to[-1,1]$, and for $k\to1$, ${C_{\alpha,\beta}}$ vanishes.
5. By , for $\lambda=\frac{1}{2}$, $0<\lambda<\frac{1}{2}$, $\frac{1}{2}<\lambda<1$, there is $\alpha+\beta=0$, $\alpha+\beta>0$, $\alpha+\beta<0$, respectively.
6. If $\lambda$ changes to $1{-}\lambda$, then $\{\alpha,\beta\}$ changes to $\{-\beta,-\alpha\}$ and the capacity remains the same, i.e., $$\label{cap2}
{{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})=\frac{\Theta^4(0)}{2\,{{\operatorname{dn}}}^2((1-\lambda)K)\Theta^4((1-\lambda)K)}\
=\frac{2{k'}^2K^2}{\pi^2{{\operatorname{dn}}}^2((1-\lambda)K)\Theta^4((1-\lambda)K)}.$$
7. The capacity is monotone, i.e., for $-1<\alpha_1\leq\alpha_2<\beta_2\leq\beta_1<1$, $${{\operatorname{cap}}}(C_{\alpha_1,\beta_1})\leq{{\operatorname{cap}}}(C_{\alpha_2,\beta_2}).$$
8. Let $C$ be any compact set in the complex plane, then for $a>0$ $${{\operatorname{cap}}}(a\,C)=a\,{{\operatorname{cap}}}(C).$$
9. By (vii), for $\alpha+\beta\geq0$, there is a trivial lower bound for ${{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})$ given by $$\label{LB1}
{{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})\geq{{\operatorname{cap}}}([-1,-\beta]\cup[\beta,1]=\tfrac{1}{2}\sqrt{1-\beta^2}.$$
10. By (vii), for $\alpha+\beta\geq0$ and $\alpha<0$, there is a trivial upper bound for ${{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})$ given by $${{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})\leq{{\operatorname{cap}}}([-1,\alpha]\cup[-\alpha,1])=\tfrac{1}{2}\sqrt{1-\alpha^2}.$$ Again by (vii), another trivial upper bound for all $-1<\alpha<\beta<1$ is $${{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})\leq{{\operatorname{cap}}}([-1,1])=\frac{1}{2}.$$
11. Another lower bound can be extracted from [@Pommerenke] $$\label{LB2}
{{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})\ge{{\operatorname{cap}}}([-1,\alpha])+{{\operatorname{cap}}}([\beta,1])=\frac{1+\alpha}{4}+\frac{1-\beta}{4}.$$
12. Finally, another upper bound can be derived from an inequality of Gillis[@Gillis], which, in our special case of two intervals, reads as follows: $$\label{UB1}
{{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})\leq2\exp\Bigl(\frac{\log\frac{1+\alpha}{8}\,\log\frac{1-\beta}{8}}{\log\frac{(1+\alpha)(1-\beta)}{64}}\Bigr)$$
13. Let $\alpha\in(-1,1)$ be fixed. Then, by and , $$\lim_{\beta\to1}{{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})=\frac{1+\alpha}{4}={{\operatorname{cap}}}([-1,\alpha]).$$ Note that this is not true for the minimum deviation $L_n({C_{\alpha,\beta}})$.
14. Let $\varphi,\psi\in(0,\pi)$ such that $\cos\varphi=\alpha$, $\cos\psi=\beta$, and let $$A:=\bigl\{z\in\mathbb{C}:|z|=1,\arg{z}\in[-\psi,\psi]\cup[\varphi,2\pi-\varphi]\bigr\},$$ i.e., ${C_{\alpha,\beta}}$ is the projection of $A$ onto the real axis. Then, by a result of Robinson[@Robinson], $${{\operatorname{cap}}}(A)=\sqrt{2\,{{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})}.$$
Main Results
============
Let us first give a lower bound for the logarithmic capacity of two intervals ${C_{\alpha,\beta}}$, proved by Alexander Yu. Solynin[@Solynin Sect.2.2] (in fact he derived a lower bound for the logarithmic capacity of several intervals). In our notation, his result reads as follows:
Let $-1<\alpha<\beta<1$ and define $$\varphi:=\arccos(\alpha), \qquad \psi:=\arccos(\beta),$$ then $$\label{LB-Solynin}
{{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})\geq\frac{1}{2}\max_{\delta\in[\psi,\varphi]}\Bigl[
\Bigl(\sin\bigl(\frac{\psi\pi}{2\delta}\bigr)\Bigr)^{2\delta^{2}/\pi^{2}}
\Bigl(\sin\bigl(\frac{(\pi-\varphi)\pi}{2(\pi-\delta)}\bigr)\Bigr)^{2(\pi-\delta)^{2}/\pi^{2}}\Bigl].$$
Numerical calculations suggest that the optimal $\delta$ in , which cannot be calculated analytically, may be roughly approximated by $\delta=(\psi+\varphi)/2$. With the optimal $\delta$, the lower bound is excellent, but also for $\delta=(\psi+\varphi)/2$, the lower bound is very good.
In addition to , we give another lower bound for the capacity of ${C_{\alpha,\beta}}$ in very simple functions of $\alpha$ and $\beta$.
Let $-1<\alpha<\beta<1$, then $$\label{LB3}
{{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})\geq\frac{\sqrt{k'}}{1+k'}=\frac{\sqrt[4]{(1-\alpha^2)(1-\beta^2)}}
{\sqrt{(1-\alpha)(1+\beta)}+\sqrt{(1+\alpha)(1-\beta)}},$$ where equality is attained for $\alpha+\beta=0$.
Let $0<k<1$ be fixed, then, by and Lemma\[Lemma\_DnTheta\], ${{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})$ is strictly monotone decreasing in $\lambda$, $0\leq\lambda\leq\frac{1}{2}$. Thus, by Lemma\[Lemma\_ThetaK2\] and ${{\operatorname{dn}}}({\tfrac{K}{2}})=\sqrt{k'}$, $${{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})\geq\frac{2{k'}^2K^2}{\pi^2{{\operatorname{dn}}}^2({\tfrac{K}{2}})\,\Theta^4({\tfrac{K}{2}})}=\frac{\sqrt{k'}}{1+k'}.$$ For $\frac{1}{2}<\lambda<1$, the inequality follows by .
For any $\alpha,\beta$, $-1<\alpha<\beta<1$, $\alpha+\beta\geq0$, the lower bound in is greater (i.e. better) than the lower bound in .
The next theorem contains the main result of the paper, an upper bound for the logarithmic capacity of two intervals ${C_{\alpha,\beta}}$.
\[Thm\_main\] Let $-1<\alpha<\beta<1$ and let $k\in(0,1)$ and $\lambda\in(0,1)$ be given by and , respectively, then $$\label{UB2}
{{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})\leq\frac{1}{2}\,{{\operatorname{dn}}}^2({\lambda{K}})\,\exp\Bigl(2(E/K-{k'}^2)\,\log^2\frac{1+{{\operatorname{sn}}}({\lambda{K}})}{{{\operatorname{cn}}}({\lambda{K}})}\Bigr),$$ where equality is attained for the limiting case $\lambda\to0$.
$$\begin{aligned}
{{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})&=\frac{1}{2\,{{\operatorname{dn}}}^2((1-\lambda)K)}\Bigl(\frac{\Theta(0)}{\Theta((1-\lambda)K)}\Bigr)^4\quad\text{by \eqref{cap2}}\\
&\leq\frac{{k'}^2}{2\,{{\operatorname{dn}}}^2((1-\lambda)K)}\,\exp\bigl(2(E/K-{k'}^2)\lambda^2K^2\bigr)\quad\text{by Lemma \ref{Lemma_BoundTheta}}\\
&\leq\frac{1}{2}\,{{\operatorname{dn}}}^2({\lambda{K}})\,\exp\bigl(2(E/K-{k'}^2)\log^2\frac{1+{{\operatorname{sn}}}({\lambda{K}})}{{{\operatorname{cn}}}({\lambda{K}})}\bigr)\quad\text{by Lemma \ref{Lemma_BoundCnDn}}\end{aligned}$$
1. Upper bound is only good in case of $\alpha+\beta\geq0$, i.e., $0<\lambda\leq\frac{1}{2}$. For $\alpha+\beta<0$, one has to replace $\{\alpha,\beta\}$ by $\{-\beta,-\alpha\}$.
2. Analogously to , we also derived a lower bound for ${{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})$, which turned out to be less than the lower bound , thus we dismissed it.
3. In Figure1, we compare the capacity ${{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})$ with the upper bounds and . The graphs of these three functions are plotted for $\alpha\in\{\pm0.7,\pm0.4,\pm0.1\}$ and $|\alpha|\leq\beta\leq{1}$.
4. By , , , and , inequality of Theorem\[Thm\_main\] may be written in the form $$\label{UB3}
{{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})\leq\frac{1+\alpha}{2(1+\beta)}\exp\Bigl[2\Bigl(\frac{E}{K}-\frac{(1+\alpha)(1-\beta)}{(1-\alpha)(1+\beta)}\Bigr)
\log^2\frac{\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{1-\alpha}}{\sqrt{1+\alpha}}\Bigr]$$ In this bound, there appear $K\equiv{K}(k)$ and $E\equiv{E}(k)$, which cannot be expressed by elementary functions of $k$. Nevertheless, there exists a couple of inequalities in the literature, see [@Alzer], [@AlzerQiu], [@AVV1990], [@AVV1992], [@AVV], [@CG], and [@QV], involving elementary functions of $k$, from which we collect the best ones in the following lemma. Hence, inequality , together with and , using and , gives an upper bound for ${{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})$ *in terms of elementary functions* of $\alpha$ and $\beta$.
![\[Fig\] The capacity ${{\operatorname{cap}}}({C_{\alpha,\beta}})$ (solid line) with the upper bounds (dashed line) and (dotted line) for $\alpha\in\{-0.7,-0.4,-0.1,0.1,0.4,0.7\}$ and $|\alpha|\leq\beta\leq{1}$](Fig)
\[Lemma\_KE\] Let $0<k<1$.
1. For the complete elliptic integral of the first kind, we have the inequalities $$\label{ineq_K}
\max\bigl\{K_1,K_2\bigr\}<K(k)<\min\bigl\{K_3,K_4,K_5\bigr\},$$ where $$\begin{aligned}
K_1&:=\frac{\pi}{2}\Bigl(\frac{\tanh^{-1}(k)}{k}\Bigr)^{3/4},\\
K_2&:=\Bigl(1+\frac{{k'}^2}{4}\Bigr)\log\Bigl(\frac{4}{k'}\Bigr)-\frac{{k'}^2}{4},
\end{aligned}$$ and $$\begin{aligned}
K_3&:=\frac{\pi}{2}\Bigl(\frac{\frac{3}{4}\log(k')}{k'-1}+\frac{1}{2(1+k')}\Bigr),\\
K_4&:=\log\Bigl(\frac{4}{k'}+\bigl(e^{\pi/2}-4\bigr)(k')^{\gamma}\Bigr),\quad \gamma:=\frac{4-\frac{\pi}{4}\,e^{\pi/2}}{e^{\pi/2}-4},\\
K_5&:=\Bigl(1+\frac{{k'}^2}{4}\Bigr)\log\Bigl(\frac{4}{k'}\Bigr).
\end{aligned}$$
2. For the complete elliptic integral of the second kind, we have the inequalities $$\label{ineq_E}
E_1<E(k)<E_2,$$ where $$E_1:=\frac{\pi}{2}\Bigl(\frac{1+{k'}^{3/2}}{2}\Bigr)^{2/3},\quad
E_2:=\frac{\pi}{2}\Bigl(\frac{1+{k'}^{\delta}}{2}\Bigr)^{1/\delta},\quad \delta:=\frac{\log(2)}{\log(\pi/2)}.$$
<!-- -->
1. $K_1<K(k)$ is proved in [@AlzerQiu Theorem18], $K_2<K(k)$ can be found in [@CG equation(31)]. For $K(k)<K_3$ and $K(k)<K_4$ see Theorems19 and 20 of [@AlzerQiu], $K(k)<K_5$ is proved in [@Alzer].
2. Both inequalities are proved by Alzer and Qiu in [@AlzerQiu Theorem22].
Numerical computations show that $$\max\bigl\{K_1,K_2\bigr\}=
\begin{cases}
K_1\quad&\text{for }0<k\leq0.888\ldots\\
K_2&\text{for }0.888\ldots\leq{k}<1
\end{cases}$$ and $$\min\bigl\{K_3,K_4,K_5\bigr\}=
\begin{cases}
K_3\quad&\text{for }0<k\leq0.971\ldots\\
K_4\quad&\text{for }0.971\ldots\leq{k}\leq0.990\ldots\\
K_5&\text{for }0.990\ldots\leq{k}<1
\end{cases}$$
Auxiliary Results for Jacobi’s Elliptic and Theta Functions
===========================================================
\[Lemma\_ThetaK2\] Let $0<k<1$. Then $$\begin{aligned}
\Theta({\tfrac{K}{2}})&=\Theta_1({\tfrac{K}{2}})=\sqrt[4]{\tfrac{2}{\pi^2}(1+k')K^2\sqrt{k'}},\\
H({\tfrac{K}{2}})&=H_1({\tfrac{K}{2}})=\sqrt[4]{\tfrac{2}{\pi^2}(1-k')K^2\sqrt{k'}}.\\
\end{aligned}$$
For the four theta-functions, the following duplication formulas hold (see [@Lawden p.21] or formula (1051.25) of [@ByrdFriedman]) $$\label{Theta2u}
\begin{aligned}
H(2u)\,\Theta(0)\,H_1(0)\,\Theta_1(0)&=2H(u)\,\Theta(u)\,H_1(u)\,\Theta_1(u)\\
H_1(2u)\,H_1(0)\,\Theta^2(0)&=\Theta^2(u)\,H_1^2(u)-H^2(u)\,\Theta_1^2(u)\\
\Theta_1(2u)\,\Theta_1(0)\,\Theta^2(0)&=\Theta^2(u)\,\Theta_1^2(u)-H^2(u)\,H_1^2(u)\\
\Theta(2u)\,\Theta^3(0)&=\Theta_1^4(u)-H_1^4(u)=\Theta^4(u)-H^4(u)
\end{aligned}$$ Further, by $\Theta(-u)=\Theta(u)$ and $\Theta_1(u+K)=\Theta(u)$, $$\Theta({\tfrac{K}{2}})=\Theta(-{\tfrac{K}{2}})=\Theta_1(-{\tfrac{K}{2}}+K)=\Theta_1({\tfrac{K}{2}}),$$ and, by $H(u)=-H(-u)$ and $H_1(u+K)=-H(u)$, $$H({\tfrac{K}{2}})=-H(-{\tfrac{K}{2}})=H_1(-{\tfrac{K}{2}}+K)=H_1({\tfrac{K}{2}}).$$ Hence, by , setting $u={\tfrac{K}{2}}$, $$\begin{gathered}
\Theta^4({\tfrac{K}{2}})-H^4({\tfrac{K}{2}})=\Theta(K)\,\Theta^3(0)=\frac{4{k'}^{3/2}K^2}{\pi^2},\\
2\,\Theta^2({\tfrac{K}{2}})\,H^2({\tfrac{K}{2}})=H(K)\,\Theta(0)\,H_1(0)\,\Theta_1(0)=\frac{4kK^2\sqrt{k'}}{\pi^2}.\end{gathered}$$ From these two equalities, the asserted formulas follow after some computation.
\[Lemma\_DnTheta\] Let $0<k<1$. Then the function ${{\operatorname{dn}}}^2(u)\,\Theta^4(u)$ is strictly monotone increasing in $u$, $0\leq{u}\leq{\tfrac{K}{2}}$.
Differentiating the above function gives $$\frac{\partial}{\partial{u}}\bigl\{{{\operatorname{dn}}}^2(u)\,\Theta^4(u)\bigr\}
=2\,{{\operatorname{dn}}}^2(u)\,\Theta^4(u)\Bigl(\underbrace{2\,{{\operatorname{zn}}}(u)-\frac{k^2{{\operatorname{sn}}}(u)\,{{\operatorname{cn}}}(u)}{{{\operatorname{dn}}}(u)}}_{=:g(u)}\Bigr).$$ Note that $g(0)=g({\tfrac{K}{2}})=0$. We prove that $g(u)>0$ for $u\in(0,{\tfrac{K}{2}})$ by showing that $g''(u)<0$ for $u\in(0,{\tfrac{K}{2}})$. Indeed, $$g''(u)=-\frac{2k^4{{\operatorname{sn}}}(u)\,{{\operatorname{cn}}}(u)}{{{\operatorname{dn}}}^3(u)}\bigl({{\operatorname{cn}}}(u)\,{{\operatorname{dn}}}(u)+k'{{\operatorname{sn}}}(u)\bigr)
\bigl(\underbrace{{{\operatorname{cn}}}(u)\,{{\operatorname{dn}}}(u)-k'{{\operatorname{sn}}}(u)}_{=:h(u)}\bigr)$$ and $h(u)$ is strictly monotone decreasing for $u\in(0,{\tfrac{K}{2}})$ and $h({\tfrac{K}{2}})=0$, thus $h(u)>0$, hence $g''(u)<0$ for $u\in(0,{\tfrac{K}{2}})$. This completes the proof.
\[Lemma\_MonCnDn\] Let $0<k<1$, then, for $0<u<K$, $\frac{\partial}{\partial{k}}\,\{{{\operatorname{cn}}}(u,k)\}>0$ and $\frac{\partial}{\partial{k}}\,\{{{\operatorname{dn}}}(u,k)\}<0$.
By (710.52) and (710.53) of [@ByrdFriedman], $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{\partial}{\partial{k}}\,\bigl\{{{\operatorname{cn}}}(u)\bigr\}&=\frac{{{\operatorname{sn}}}(u)\,{{\operatorname{dn}}}(u)}{k{k'}^2}\Bigl(
\underbrace{E(u)-{k'}^2u-\frac{k^2{{\operatorname{sn}}}(u)\,{{\operatorname{cn}}}(u)}{{{\operatorname{dn}}}(u)}}_{=:f(u)}\Bigr)\\
\frac{\partial}{\partial{k}}\,\bigl\{{{\operatorname{dn}}}(u)\bigr\}&=\frac{k\,{{\operatorname{sn}}}(u)\,{{\operatorname{cn}}}(u)}{{k'}^2}\Bigl(
\underbrace{E(u)-{k'}^2u-\frac{{{\operatorname{sn}}}(u)\,{{\operatorname{dn}}}(u)}{{{\operatorname{cn}}}(u)}}_{=:g(u)}\Bigr)\end{aligned}$$ Hence, it suffices to show that $f(u)>0$ and $g(u)<0$ for $0<u<K$. Obviously, $f(0)=g(0)=0$, and, using the formulas (121.00) of [@ByrdFriedman], $$f'(u)=\frac{k^2{k'}^2{{\operatorname{sn}}}^2(u)}{{{\operatorname{dn}}}^2(u)},\qquad
g'(u)=-\frac{{k'}^2}{{{\operatorname{cn}}}^2(u)},$$ thus $f'(u)>0$ and $g'(u)<0$ for $0<u<K$, which gives $f(u)>0$ and $g(u)<0$, $0<u<K$.
\[Lemma\_BoundCnDn\] Let $0<k<1$, then, for $0\leq{u}<K$, $$\frac{1}{{{\operatorname{dn}}}(u,k)}\leq\cosh(u)\leq\frac{1}{{{\operatorname{cn}}}(u,k)},$$ and $$\log\frac{1+k\,{{\operatorname{sn}}}(u)}{{{\operatorname{dn}}}(u)}\leq{u}\leq\log\frac{1+{{\operatorname{sn}}}(u)}{{{\operatorname{cn}}}(u)}.$$
By Lemma\[Lemma\_MonCnDn\] and the fact that $$\lim_{k\to1}{{\operatorname{cn}}}(u,k)=\lim_{k\to1}{{\operatorname{dn}}}(u,k)=\frac{1}{\cosh(u)}$$ we get ${{\operatorname{cn}}}(u,k)\leq1/\cosh(u)$ and ${{\operatorname{dn}}}(u,k)\geq1/\cosh(u)$ for every $u\in(0,K)$. The second inequality follows immediately by the well known formula $\cosh^{-1}(u)=\log(u+\sqrt{u^2-1})$.
\[Lemma\_BoundZn\] Let $0<k<1$, then, for $0\leq{u}\leq{K}$, $${{\operatorname{zn}}}(u)\leq(E-{k'}^2K)(1-u/K).$$
Define $$f(u):=(E-{k'}^2K)(1-u/K)-{{\operatorname{zn}}}(u),$$ then $f(K)=0$ and $f'(u)={k'}^2-{{\operatorname{dn}}}^2(u)<0$ for $0\leq{u}\leq{K}$, thus $f(u)\geq0$ for $0\leq{u}\leq{K}$.
\[Lemma\_BoundTheta\] Let $0<k<1$, then, for $0\leq\lambda\leq1$, $$\label{ThetaUpperBound}
\frac{\Theta(0)}{\Theta({\lambda{K}})}\leq\sqrt{k'}\,\exp\bigl(\tfrac{1}{2}\bigl(E/K-{k'}^2\bigr)(1-\lambda)^2K^2\bigr).$$
For $0\leq{u}\leq{K}$, we have $$\log\frac{\Theta(K)}{\Theta(u)}=-\log\frac{\Theta(u)}{\Theta(K)}=-\int_{K}^{u}{{\operatorname{zn}}}(v)\,{{\operatorname{d}}}{v}=\int_{u}^{K}{{\operatorname{zn}}}(v)\,{{\operatorname{d}}}{v}.$$ Thus, by Lemma\[Lemma\_BoundZn\], $$\log\frac{\Theta(K)}{\Theta(u)}\leq\int_{u}^{K}(E-{k'}^2K)(1-v/K)\,{{\operatorname{d}}}{v}
=(E-{k'}^2K)(K/2-u+u^2/(2K))$$ Taking $\exp$ on both sides and using the relation $\Theta(0)=\sqrt{k'}\,\Theta(K)$ gives .
[^1]: University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, School of Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Stelzhamerstrasse23, 4600 Wels, Austria, <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">[email protected]</span>
[^2]: published in: Complex Variables and Elliptic Equations [**53**]{} (2008), 65–75.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'Let $A$ be a commutative noetherian ring of Krull dimension $3$. We give a necessary and sufficient condition for $A$-projective modules of rank $2$ to be free. Using this, we show that all the finitely generated projective modules over the algebraic real $3$-sphere are free.'
address: |
Jean Fasel\
EPFL SB SMA-GE\
MA C3 595 (Bâtiment MA)\
Station 8\
CH-1015 Lausanne
author:
- 'J. Fasel'
bibliography:
- 'biblio\_cancellation.bib'
title: Projective modules over the real algebraic sphere of dimension $3$
---
Introduction
============
Let $A$ be a noetherian commutative ring of Krull dimension $d$ and let $P$ be a projective $A$-module of rank $r$. Finding “computable” necessary and sufficient conditions for $P$ to be free is in general a very hard question. The first obvious obstruction is the class of $P$ in $\widetilde K_0(A)$ and, if $r>d$ its vanishing is also a sufficient condition by Bass-Schanuel cancellation theorem. Thus one is reduced to the case of stably free modules of rank $r\leq d$. In the critical case $r=d$, the situation is rather well understood. Observe first that a stably free module of rank $r=d$ can be seen as the kernel of a surjection $A^{d+1}\to A$ and that such surjections are given by rows $\uni {d+1}a$ such that the $a_i$’s generate $A$. Such a row is called unimodular, and it is easily seen that there is an action of $GL_{d+1}(A)$ on the set $Um_{d+1}(A)$ of unimodular rows of rank $d+1$. A stably free module is free if and only if its associated unimodular row is in the $GL_{d+1}(A)$ orbit of $(1,0,\ldots,0)$. This obstruction is “computable” in the following sense: If $E_{d+1}(A)$ is the subgroup of $GL_{d+1}(A)$ generated by the elementary matrices, then there is a structure of abelian group on $Um_{d+1}(A)/E_{d+1}(A)$ ([@vdk Theorem 4.1]). If moreover $A$ is a smooth $k$-algebra of dimension $d\geq 3$ over a perfect field of characteristic different from $2$, this group can be seen as the cohomology group $H^d(A,G^{d+1})$, where $G^{d+1}$ is a suitable sheaf on $\spec A$ ([@Fa4 Theorem 4.9]). The induced action of $SL_{d+1}(A)$ on $Um_{d+1}(A)/E_{d+1}$ reads in this particular situation as a group homomorphism $SL_{d+1}(A)/E_{d+1}(A)\to Um_{d+1}(A)/E_{d+1}(A)$ defined by sending a matrix to its first row. The cokernel of this map is in bijection with $Um_{d+1}(A)/SL_{d+1}(A)$, which is therefore computable in some situations (see [@Fa4 Theorem 5.6] for some cases).
If the projective module $P$ is of rank $r<d$, then the situation is much harder. For example, the question whether there exists a complex smooth algebra $A$ of dimension $3$ and a stably free non free projective $A$-module of rank $2$ has been solved only recently ([@Fa2 Theorem 5.4]). In this paper, we prove the following theorem (Theorem \[cancellation\] in the text):
Let $A$ be a ring of dimension $3$. Then every projective module of rank $2$ with trivial determinant is free if and only if the group $\K A$ and the set $Um_4(A)/\Sp A$ are both zero.
The group $\K A$ appearing in the theorem is just the Grothendieck-Witt group $GW^2(A)$ modulo the subgroup generated by the antisymmetric form $H(A)$ and $Um_4(A)/\Sp A$ is just the set of orbits of $Um_4(A)$ under the action of $\Sp A$. The first group is “computable” in the sense that it is part of a cohomology theory.
As an application of the above result, we get the following theorem (Theorem \[main\] in the text):
Every finitely generated projective module over the real algebraic sphere of dimension $3$ is free.
It should be pointed out that the stable structure of the algebraic vector bundles on spheres is well-known ([@Fo]; [@Sw2]), but that the set of isomorphism classes of such vector bundles is much more difficult to compute. At the moment, this is known only for the circle $S^1$ (obvious) and the two-dimensional sphere $S^2$ ([@BO]). The result on $S^3$ could be thought of as a measure of the recent progresses made in understanding the unstable structure of projective modules.
The paper is organized as follows: In Section \[symplectic\], we recall a few basic facts about symplectic modules. This includes the definitions of the group $\K A$, and the definition of the Euler class of a projective module of rank $2$. The following section is devoted to the study of the set of unimodular rows of even length $n$ under the action of the symplectic group $Sp_n(A)$. We show that a unimodular row of even length $n$ gives a stably free module of rank $n-2$ endowed with an antisymmetric form. This form is stably isometric to $H(A^{n/2})$ (whose class in $\K A$ is therefore trivial) and becomes isometric to $H(A^{(n-2)/2})$ if and only if its associated unimodular row is in the $Sp_{n}(A)$-orbit of $(1,0,\ldots,0)$. We prove the theorem on the freeness of projective modules of rank $2$ in Section \[core\]. The basic (and classical) observation here is that every projective module of rank $2$ is endowed with a non-degenerated antisymmetric form. In Section \[gwss\], we recall the definition and the basic properties of the Gersten-Witt complex. The last section shows that the group $\K A$ and the set $Um_4(A)/Sp_4(A)$ involved in the first theorem vanish when $A=S^3$ is the coordinate ring of the real algebraic sphere of dimension $d$. Since $\K {S^3}$ coincide with the derived Witt group $W^2(S^3)$ as defined by Balmer ([@BalSurvey]), we compute the latter. It must be pointed out that C. Walter announced the computation of the derived Witt groups of quadrics, and therefore we only compute the groups needed in our main result without going to much into the details. Our computation is rather technical, and probably one can find a better approach. We conclude with the proof of our theorem that all the finitely generated projective modules on $S^3$ are free.
Conventions
-----------
All the rings considered are commutative and noetherian. The dimension of a ring will always be its Krull dimension. If $X$ is a scheme and $x\in X$, we denote by $\kappa(x)$ the residue field of $x$. If $X$ is integral, we simply denote by $\kappa(X)$ the residue field at the generic point.
Symplectic modules {#symplectic}
==================
The group $\Ko AL$
------------------
Let $A$ be a commutative ring and let $L$ be a line bundle over $A$. Let $GW^2(A,L)$ be the Grothendieck-Witt group of the (exact) category of projective $A$-modules endowed with the duality $\homm A{\_}L$ and the usual canonical isomorphism $\omega:Id\to \homm A{\homm A{\_}L}L$. Explicitly, $GW^2(A,L)$ is the Grothendieck group of the monoid (with the orthogonal sum $\bot$ as operation) of isometry classes of pairs $(P,\phi)$, where $P$ is a projective $A$-module and $\phi:P\to \homm APL$ is an anti-symmetric isomorphism.
If $Q$ is a projective $A$-module, we define $H(Q)$ to be the pair $(Q\oplus \homm AQL,h)$, where $$h:Q\oplus \homm APL\to \homm AQL\oplus \homm A{\homm APL}L$$ is defined by $h(q,f)(q^\prime,f^\prime)=f(q^\prime)-f^\prime(q)$. This induces a homomorphism $$H:K_0(A)\to GW^2(A,L)$$ whose cokernel is the Witt group $W^2(A,L)$.
We denote by $\Ko AL$ the quotient of $GW^2(A,L)$ by the subgroup generated by $H(A)$. If $L=A$, we simply denote by $\K A$ the group $\Ko AA$.
Euler classes
-------------
Let $P$ be a projective module of rank $2$. Then $P$ is endowed with an anti-symmetric form $\chi:P\to \homm AP{\det P}$ defined by $\chi(p)(q)=p\wedge q$. We denote by $e(P)$ the class of $(P,\chi)$ in $\Ko A{\det P}$. Suppose that $f:P\to Q$ is an isomorphism of (rank $2$) projective modules. Then $\det f$ induces an isomorphism $\Ko A{\det P}\to \Ko A{\det Q}$ under which $e(P)$ is sent to $e(Q)$. The Euler class satisfies good functorial properties, as shown in [@FS §2.4, §2.5]. In particular,
\[vanishing\] Suppose that $P\simeq (\det P)\oplus A$. Then $e(P)=0$.
If $A$ is of dimension $2$, then the proposition is the easy part of a stronger result ([@FS Proposition 23]):
Let $A$ be a ring of dimension $2$. Then $e(P)=0$ if and only if $P\simeq (\det P)\oplus A$.
If $A$ is of dimension $3$, then the above result is no longer true, and even for a stably free module of rank $2$ we need another obstruction to detect whether it is free or not. This is the object of the next section.
Unimodular rows under the symplectic group {#unimodular}
==========================================
Unimodular rows
---------------
A unimodular row of length $n$ is a surjective homomorphism $A^n\to A$. Equivalently, a unimodular row is represented by a set $\uni na$ of elements of $A$ which generate the ideal $A$. The group $GL_n(A)$ acts on $Um_n(A)$ by composition, and therefore any subgroup of $GL_n(A)$ also acts. Traditionally, one is interested either in $E_n(A)$ (the subgroup generated by the elementary matrices) or in $GL_n(A)$ itself. Indeed, the set of orbits $Um_n(A)/GL_n(A)$ detects the stably free non free modules of rank $n-1$ as follows:
Let $v=\uni na$ be a unimodular row and let $P(v)$ be the projective module defined by the exact sequence $$\xymatrix@C=2em{0\ar[r] & P(v)\ar[r] & A^n\ar[r]^-{v} & A\ar[r] & 0.}$$ It is easily seen that the following proposition holds:
\[free\] The modules $P(v)$ and $P(v^\prime)$ are isomorphic if and only if there is a matrix $G\in GL_n(A)$ such that $vG=v^\prime$.
This proposition also shows that the set $Um_n(A)/GL_n(A)$ is quite hard to compute in general. If one restricts to $E_n(A)$, the situation is slightly better, as shown by the next result due to W. van der Kallen ([@vdk Theorem 4.1]):
Let $A$ be a ring of dimension $d$. If $n\geq (d+4)/2$ then $Um_n(A)/E_n(A)$ has the structure of an abelian group.
Of course, this doesn’t imply that $Um_n(A)/E_n(A)$ becomes suddenly easy to compute. However, in the special situation when $A$ is a smooth algebra of dimension $d$ over a field of characteristic different from $2$, it is shown in [@Fa4] that $Um_{d+1}(A)/E_{d+1}(A)$ (same $d$) has a cohomological interpretation (\[loc. cit., Theorem 4.9\]). This led to the computation of those groups for any smooth rational oriented real algebra (\[loc. cit.,Theorem 5.6\]).
Suppose now that $n$ is even. Then $A^n$ is the underlying module of the antisymmetric form $h:A^n\simeq (A^n)^\vee$ which is $\bot_{n/2}H(A)$. Any unimodular row $v$ of length $n$ gives a stably free module of rank $n-2$ endowed with an antisymmetric form as follows:
The exact sequence $$\xymatrix{0\ar[r] & P(v)\ar[r]^-i & A^n\ar[r]^-v & A\ar[r] & 0}$$ yields a commutative diagram $$\xymatrix{0\ar[r] & A^\vee\ar[r]^-{v^\vee}\ar@{-->}[d]_-s & (A^n)^\vee\ar[r]^-{i^\vee}\ar[d]_-{h^{-1}} & P(v)^\vee\ar[r]\ar@{-->}[d]_-{-s^\vee} & 0 \\
0\ar[r] & P(v)\ar[r]_-i & A^n\ar[r]_-v & A\ar[r] & 0}$$ Since $h$ is antisymmetric $vh^{-1}v^\vee=0$ and therefore we get a homomorphism $s$ making the diagram commutative. Observe that $\ker {s^\vee}$ is projective and equal to $\coker s^\vee$. The snake lemma gives an isomorphism $\coker s\to \ker s^\vee$ which is antisymmetric.
If $v$ is a unimodular row of even length $n$, we denote by $(Q(v),\phi(v))$ the antisymmetric pair obtained above.
\[isometry\] There is an isometry $(Q(v),\phi(v))\bot H(A)\simeq H(A^{n/2})$.
Consider the following diagram $$\xymatrix{ & & & Q(v)^\vee\ar[d]^-{j^\vee} & \\
0\ar[r] & A\ar[r]^-{v^\vee}\ar[d]_-s & (A^n)^\vee\ar[r]^-{i^\vee}\ar[d]_-{h^{-1}}\ar@{-->}[ru]^-{\gamma^\vee} & P(v)^\vee\ar[r]\ar[d]_-{-s^\vee} & 0\\
0\ar[r] & P(v)\ar[r]_-i\ar[d]_-j & A^n\ar[r]_-v & A\ar[r] & 0 \\
& Q(v)\ar@{-->}[ru]_-\gamma & & &}$$ Choosing an element $w\in A^n$ such that $v\cdot w=1$ we get a section $\alpha$ of $v$ and therefore a section $r=i^\vee h\alpha$ of $-s^\vee$ and a retraction $-r^\vee$ of $s$. This gives a section $\beta$ of $j$ and we get an injective homomorphism $\gamma:Q(v)\to A^n$. One checks easily that $\phi(v)=\gamma^\vee h\gamma$ and that we have $A^n=Ah^{-1}v^\vee\oplus Aw\oplus \gamma Q(v)$. Moreover, $w$ and $h^{-1}v^\vee$ are both in $\gamma Q(v)^\bot$ and they generate a submodule isometric to $H(A)$.
The following result is the analogue of Proposition \[free\] for “decorated” modules:
\[sympl\] The pairs $(Q(v),\phi(v))$ and $(Q(v^\prime),\phi(v^\prime))$ are isometric if and only if there is a matrix $M\in Sp_n(A)$ such that $vM=v^\prime$.
Following the construction of $Q(v^\prime)$ for $v^\prime=vM$, we see that in that case $(Q(v^\prime),\phi(v^\prime))$ is isometric to $(Q(v),\phi(v))$. Lemma \[isometry\] gives the converse statement.
This shows that $Um_n(A)/Sp_n(A)$ classifies the stably free modules of rank $n-2$ decorated with the antisymmetric form obtained above.
Cancellation of symplectic modules {#core}
==================================
Let $A$ be a ring of odd dimension $d\geq 3$. Let $(Q,\phi)$ be an antisymmetric pair, where $Q$ is of rank $d-1$. Suppose that there is an isometry $$f:H(A)\bot (Q,\phi)\simeq H(A^{(d+1)/2})$$ The projection of $A^2$ to the first factor gives a homomorphism $e_1^*:A^2\oplus Q\to A$. Then $e_1^*f^{-1}$ is a unimodular row of length $d+1$. If $g$ is another such isometry, then $gf^{-1}\in Sp_{d+1}(A)$ and $e_1^*g^{-1}(gf^{-1})=e_1^*f^{-1}$. Therefore, the class of $e_1^*f^{-1}$ in $Um_{d+1}(A)/Sp_{d+1}(A)$ is independent of the isometry $f$.
If $(Q,\phi)$ is a symmetric pair such that $Q$ is of rank $d-1$ and $H(A)\bot (Q,\phi)\simeq H(A^{(d+1)/2})$, we denote by $sp(Q,\phi)$ the class of $e_1^*f^{-1}$ in the set $Um_{d+1}(A)/Sp_{d+1}(A)$ for any isometry $f$. We call it the *symplectic class* of $(Q,\phi)$.
This definition seems rather artificial at first sight. However, the next proposition shows that it is natural.
\[identification\] Let $v:=sp(Q,\phi)$. Then $(Q,\phi)$ is isometric to $(Q(v),\phi(v))$.
Let $f:H(A)\bot (Q,\phi)\simeq H(A^{(d+1)/2})$ be the isometry defining $sp(Q,\phi)$. Consider the commutative diagram $$\xymatrix{0\ar[r] & Q\oplus A\ar[r]\ar@{-->}[d]_-{f^\prime} & Q\oplus A^2\ar[r]^-{e_1^*}\ar[d]_-f & A\ar[r]\ar@{=}[d] & 0\\
0\ar[r] & P(v)\ar[r] & A^n\ar[r]_-{v} & A\ar[r] & 0}$$ The construction of $(Q(v),\phi(v))$ shows that $f^\prime:Q\oplus A\to P(v)$ induces an isometry $(Q,\phi)\simeq (Q(v),\phi(v))$.
So we have a procedure to understand when an antisymmetric pair $(Q,\phi)$ is isometric to $H(A^{(d-1)/2})$. The first obstruction is its class in $\K A$. If this is different from $0$, then it cannot be isometric to $H(A^{(d-1)/2})$. If the class is zero, then (using [@Bass2 Chapter IV, Corollary 4.15]) we get an isometry $$(Q,\phi)\bot H(A)\simeq (A^{(d+1)/2}).$$ and therefore a symplectic class in $Um_{d+1}(A)/Sp_{d+1}(A)$. Using Propositions \[identification\] and \[sympl\], we see that this class must be trivial in order for $(Q,\phi)$ to be isometric to $H(A^{(d-1)/2})$.
In dimension $3$, this procedure gives a complete understanding of projective modules of rank $2$.
\[cancellation\] Let $A$ be a ring of dimension $3$. Then every projective module of rank $2$ with trivial determinant is free if and only if the group $\K A$ and the set $Um_4(A)/\Sp A$ are both trivial.
Remark first that every element in $\K A$ is of the form $e(P)$ for some projective module $P$ of rank $2$ (use [@Bass2 Chapter IV, Theorem 4.12]). If every such module is free, then $\K A=0$ because the only non degenerate anti-symmetric form on $A^2$ is $h$ (up to isometry). The set $Um_4(A)/\Sp A$ is reduced to a point because of Proposition \[sympl\].
Suppose now that $\K A=0$. Then the Euler class of $P$ is zero for any $P$ of rank $2$, and its symplectic class (which is then defined) is in the $Sp_4(A)$-orbit of $(1,0,0,0)$. Therefore any such $P$ is free by Proposition \[sympl\] again.
In the last section, we show that the real algebraic sphere of dimension $3$ satisfy the hypothesis of the theorem. We first need some preparation in order to compute the group $\K {S^3}$. This is the object of the next section.
The Gersten-Witt complex {#gwss}
========================
The complex
-----------
Let $X$ be an integral regular scheme over a field $k$. Let $d=\dim X$. The *Gersten-Witt complex* is the complex $$\xymatrix@C=1.3em{0\ar[r] & W(\kappa(X))\ar[r] & \displaystyle{\bigoplus_{x_1\in X^{(1)}} W(\kappa(x_1)) }\ar[r] & \ldots \ar[r] & \displaystyle{\bigoplus_{x_d\in X^{(d)}} W(\kappa(x_d)) }\ar[r] & 0}$$ as constructed in [@BW]. Observe that the Witt groups in the complex are in fact twisted Witt groups, i.e. Witt groups with twisted duality $\homm {\kappa(x_p)}{\_}{\omega_{x_p}}$, where $\omega_{x_p}=\exten p{\O_{X,x_p}}{\kappa(x_p)}{\O_{X,x_p}}$ (which is a $\kappa(x_p)$-vector space of dimension $1$ because $X$ is regular). We denote by $H^i(X,W)$ the cohomology groups of this complex. If $d\leq 3$, we have that $H^i(X,W)=W^i(X)$ for $0\leq i\leq 3$ ([@BW] again).
Even if the Witt groups in the complex are twisted by line bundles, we can still define the fundamental ideal and the groups behaving like the powers of it (just choose any isomorphism between the twisted Witt group and the classical Witt group, see for instance [@Fa1 Definition 9.2.1]). It turns out that the differentials of the Gersten-Witt complex respect the powers of the fundamental ideal ([@Fa1 Theorem 9.2.4], or [@Gi2]), and therefore we get a complex $$\xymatrix@C=1.3em{0\ar[r] & I^j(\kappa(X))\ar[r] & \displaystyle{\bigoplus_{x_1\in X^{(1)}} I^{j-1}(\kappa(x_1)) }\ar[r] & \ldots \ar[r] & \displaystyle{\bigoplus_{x_d\in X^{(d)}} I^{j-d}(\kappa(x_d)) }\ar[r] & 0}$$ for any $j$ (where $I^l(\kappa(x_p))$ is defined to be $W(\kappa(x_p))$ if $l\leq 0$). We denote by $H^i(X,I^j)$ the cohomology groups of this complex. We get $H^i(X,W)=H^i(X,I^j)$ when $j\leq 0$ by definition.
Let $\overline I^j(\kappa(x_p))=I^j(\kappa(x_p))/I^{j+1}(\kappa(x_p))$. Since the Gersten-Witt complex respects the powers of the fundamental ideal, we get a complex $$\xymatrix@C=1.3em{0\ar[r] &\overline I^j(\kappa(X))\ar[r] & \displaystyle{\bigoplus_{x_1\in X^{(1)}}\overline I^{j-1}(\kappa(x_1)) }\ar[r] & \ldots \ar[r] & \displaystyle{\bigoplus_{x_d\in X^{(d)}}\overline I^{j-d}(\kappa(x_d)) }\ar[r] & 0}$$ which coincides with the Gersten complex in étale cohomology with coefficient in $\mu_2$ by Voevodsky’s results ([@OVV] and [@Vo]). For any $i,j\in\Z$, let $H^i(X,\overline I^j)$ denote the cohomology groups of this complex. Observe that $H^i(X,\overline I^j)=0$ if $i>j$ and that $H^i(X,\overline I^i)=CH^i(X)/2$ ([@Gi2 Theorem 9.1]). By construction, we have for any $j$ a long exact sequence in cohomology $$\xymatrix@=1.3em{0\ar[r] & H^0(X,I^{j+1})\ar[r] & H^0(X,I^j)\ar[r] & H^0(X,\overline I^j)\ar[r] & H^1(X,I^{j+1})\ar[r] & \ldots }$$ This sequence (and the fact that $H^i(X,\overline I^j)=0$ if $i>j$) yields the following Lemma whose proof is obvious:
\[comparison\] Let $X$ be a regular scheme over a field $k$. Then for any $j\in\Z$ we have $H^i(X,W)=H^i(X,I^j)$ if $i\geq j+1$. Moreover, the natural homomorphism $H^j(X,I^j)\to H^j(X,W)$ is surjective.
In case $j=1$, one can say a bit more:
\[deg\_1\] Let $X$ be a regular scheme over a field $k$. Then $H^1(X,I)=H^1(X,W)$.
Using the long exact sequence in cohomology $$\xymatrix{H^0(X,W)\ar[r] & H^0(X,\overline W)\ar[r] & H^1(X,I)\ar[r] & H^1(X,W)\ar[r] & 0,}$$ we see that it suffices to prove that the homomorphism $H^0(X,W)\to H^0(X,\overline W)$ is surjective to conclude. Since the Gersten-Witt complex of a scheme is the direct sum of the Gersten-Witt complexes of its connected components, we can suppose that $X$ is connected. Let $p:X\to k$ be the projection. Then we have a commutative diagram $$\xymatrix{H^0(k,W)\ar[r]\ar[d]_-{p^*} & H^0(k,\overline W)\ar@{=}[d]\\
H^0(X,W)\ar[r] & H^0(X,\overline W)}$$ and the above horizontal homomorphism is clearly surjective.
Supports
--------
As in the previous section, let $X$ be an integral scheme of dimension $d$ over a field $k$. If $Y\subset X$ is a closed subscheme, one can consider the *Gersten-Witt complex with support on $Y$*: $$\xymatrix@C=0.9em{0\ar[r] & \displaystyle{\bigoplus_{x_0\in X^{(0)}\cap Y} W(\kappa(x_0)) }\ar[r] & \displaystyle{\bigoplus_{x_1\in X^{(1)}\cap Y} W(\kappa(x_1)) }\ar[r] & \ldots \ar[r] & \displaystyle{\bigoplus_{x_d\in X^{(d)}\cap Y} W(\kappa(x_d)) }\ar[r] & 0}$$ and its filtered version $$\xymatrix@C=1.3em{0\ar[r] & \displaystyle{\bigoplus_{x_0\in X^{(0)}\cap Y} I^j(\kappa(x_0)) }\ar[r] & \ldots \ar[r] & \displaystyle{\bigoplus_{x_d\in X^{(d)}\cap Y} I^{j-d}(\kappa(x_d)) }\ar[r] & 0.}$$ We denote by $H^i_Y(X,I^j)$ the cohomology groups of this complex. In case $Y$ is the zero locus of a global section $f\in \O_X(X)$, we simply denote by $H^i_f(X,I^j)$ the group $H^i_Y(X,I^j)$. All the results of Section \[gwss\] remains true for groups with support. In addition, there is a long exact sequence $$\xymatrix@C=1.4em{\ldots\ar[r] & H^i_Y(X,I^j)\ar[r] & H^i(X,I^j)\ar[r] & H^i(U,I^j)\ar[r] & H^{i+1}_Y(X,I^j)\ar[r] & \ldots}$$ for any $j\in\Z$, where $U=X-Y$. If $Y\to X$ is smooth, one can compare the cohomology groups with support on $Y$ with the cohomology groups of $Y$ ([@Fa1 Remark 9.3.5]). We will need only the following particular result ([@Gi1 Theorem 4.1] and [@Fa1 Remark 9.3.5]) :
\[reg\_param\] Let $X=\spec A$ be a regular affine scheme over a field $k$. Let $f\in A$ be a regular element such that $Y=\spec {A/f}$ is regular. Then $$H^i_f(X,I^j)\simeq H^{i-1}(Y,I^{j-1})$$ for any $i,j\in\Z$.
The real sphere of dimension $3$ {#witt}
================================
Our goal of the section is to compute the group $\K {S^3}$, which coincide with the Witt group $W^2(S^3)$ (see Corollary \[s3\]). As $S^3$ is of dimension $3$, $W^2(S^3)=H^2(S^3,W)$ which is really the group that we are going to compute.
Auxiliary computations
----------------------
For any $n\in\N$, let $S^n=\R[x_0,\ldots,x_n]/(\sum x_i^2-1)$. Using the long exact sequence of localization, we see that it suffices to compute the Witt groups of $S^{n-1}$ and $S^n_{x_n}$ to compute the Witt groups of $S^n$. The ring $S^n_{x_n}$ has a nice expression:
If $B^n=\R[x_0,\ldots,x_n]/(\sum_{i=0}^{n-2} x_i^2-x_{n-1}x_n+1)$ (for $n\geq 1$), there is an isomorphism $$\psi:S^n_{x_n}\to B^n_{x_{n-1}+x_n}$$ defined by $$\psi(x_i)=\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac {2x_i}{(x_{n-1}+x_n)} & \mbox{for any $0\leq i\leq n-2$,}\\
\frac {x_n-x_{n-1}}{(x_{n-1}+x_n)} & \mbox{if $i=n-1$,}\\
\frac 2{(x_{n-1}+x_n)} & \mbox{if $i=n$.}
\end{array}\right.$$ Its inverse is the homomorphism $\phi:B^n_{x_{n-1}+x_n}\to S^n_{x_n}$ defined by $$\phi(x_i)=\left\{ \begin{array}{cl} \frac {x_i}{x_n} & \mbox{for any $0\leq i\leq n-2$,}\\
\frac {1-x_{n-1}}{x_n} & \mbox{if $i=n-1$,}\\
\frac {1+x_{n-1}}{x_n} & \mbox{if $i=n$.}
\end{array}\right.$$ The computation of $H^i(B^n,W)$ with $n$ small is not very difficult. To achieve this, we need an additional auxiliary ring $C^n=\R[x_0,\ldots,x_n]/(\sum x_i^2+1)$.
\[comput\_c1\] We have $$H^i(C^1,W)=\left\{ \begin{array}{cl} \Z/4 & \mbox{if $i=0$,}\\
0 & \mbox{if $i\geq 1$.}\end{array}\right.$$
Since $C^1$ is a curve, $H^i(C^1,W)=0$ for $i\geq 2$. We also get $H^0(C^1,W)=W^0(C^1)=\Z/4$, generated by the class of $\langle 1\rangle$ by [@Mon Theorem 2.9]. To compute $H^1$, we first observe that $H^1(C^1,I)=H^1(C^1,W)$ by Lemma \[deg\_1\].
Using [@EL Theorem 2’], we get that $I^2(\kappa(C^1))=0$. Moreover, since $C^1$ has no real point then $I(\kappa(x_1))=0$ for any closed point $x_1$. Therefore, $H^1(C^1,I)\simeq H^1(C^1,\overline I)$. The latter is just $Pic(C)/2$, which is trivial by [@Sw1].
\[comput\_c2\] We have $$H^i(C^2,W)=\left\{ \begin{array}{cl}
\Z/2 & \mbox{if $i=1$,}\\
0 & \mbox{if $i\geq 2$.}
\end{array}\right.$$
Since $C^2$ is a surface, we have $H^i(C^2,W)=0$ if $i\geq 3$. Because $C^2$ has no real point, we have $H^2(C^2,I^2)=0$ by [@Fa4 Proposition 5.1] (observe that $C^2$ has a trivial canonical bundle). This shows that $H^2(C^2,W)=H^2(C^2,I)=0$.
Lemma \[deg\_1\] shows that $H^1(C^2,I)=H^1(C^2,W)$. We then use the sequence comparing $I$ and $I^2$: $$\xymatrix@C=1.4em{\ldots\ar[r] & H^1(C^2,I^2)\ar[r] & H^1(C^2,I)\ar[r] & H^1(C^2,\overline I)\ar[r] & H^2(C^2,I^2)\ar[r] & H^2(C^2,I)\ar[r] & 0.}$$ which reduces to $$\xymatrix@C=1.4em{\ldots\ar[r] & H^1(C^2,I^2)\ar[r] & H^1(C^2,I)\ar[r] & H^1(C^2,\overline I)\ar[r]& 0}$$ by the above discussion.
Since none of the residue fields of $\spec {C^2}$ admits an ordering, we obtain $H^i(C^2,I^2)=H^i(C^2,\overline I^2)$ (argue as in [@Suj]). Now $H^1(C^2,\overline I^2)=0$ by [@CS Corollary 3.3, Remark 3.3.1]. This implies that the map $H^1(C^2,I)\to H^1(C^2,\overline I)$ is an isomorphism. Since $Pic(C^2)/2=\Z/2$ by [@Sw1 Theorem 9.2(b)], we get $H^1(C^2,W)=\Z/2$.
\[explicit\_c2\] The generator of $H^1(C^2,W)$ can be explicitly obtained. Using [@Sw1 Remark, p 471], we find that the generator of $Pic(C^2)$ is the class of the prime ideal $\mathfrak p_1=(x_0^2+1, x_0x_1+x_2)$. Since $(x_0^2+1)(x_1^2+1)=(x_0x_1+x_2)(x_0x_1-x_2)$ and $(x_0x_1-x_2)\not\in\mathfrak p_1$ we see that $\mathfrak p_1C^2_{\mathfrak p_1}$ is generated by $x_0^2+1$. We thus get an isomorphism (necessarily symmetric) of $\kappa(\mathfrak p_1)$-vector spaces $$\rho_{x_0^2+1}:\kappa(\mathfrak p_1)\to \exten 1{C^2_{\mathfrak p_1}}{\kappa(\mathfrak p_1)}{C^2_{\mathfrak p_1}}$$ defined by $1\mapsto Kos(x_0^2+1)$, where the latter is the Koszul complex associated to the regular parameter $x_0^2+1$.
Consider next $\mathfrak p_2=(x_2)$. As above, we get a symmetric isomorphism of $\kappa(\mathfrak p_2)$-vector spaces $$\rho_{x_2}:\kappa(\mathfrak p_2)\to \exten 1{C^2_{\mathfrak p_2}}{\kappa(\mathfrak p_2)}{C^2_{\mathfrak p_2}}$$ defined by $1\mapsto Kos(x_2)$, where the latter is the Koszul complex associated to the regular parameter $x_2$.
The isomorphism $H^1(C^2,I)\simeq H^1(C^2,\overline I)$ (and the fact that $\mathfrak p_2$ is principal) shows that the class of the cycle $(\kappa(\mathfrak p_1),\rho_{x_0^2+1})+(\kappa(\mathfrak p_2),x_1\rho_{x_2})$ is the generator of $H^1(C^2,I)$ (observe also that we could have considered $(\kappa(\mathfrak p_1),\rho_{x_0^2+1})$ alone as a generator, but we will need $(\kappa(\mathfrak p_2),\rho_{x_2})$ later and this is why we consider it).
Observe next that $B^1\simeq \R[x_0,x_0^{-1}]$ and $B^n/x_n=C^{n-2}[x_{n-1}]$ for $n\geq 2$, while $B^n_{x_n}\simeq \R[x_0,\ldots,x_{n-2},x_n,x_n^{-1}]=B^1[x_0,\ldots,x_{n-2}]$.
\[comput\_bn\] For $1\leq n\leq 3$, we have $$H^i(B^n,W)=\left\{ \begin{array}{cl} \Z\oplus \Z & \mbox{if $i=0$,}\\
0 & \mbox{if $i\geq 1$.}
\end{array}\right.$$
Since $B^1=\R[x_0,x_0^{-1}]$, the result for $B^1$ follows from [@Gi1 Corollary 5.2]. Since $B^n_{x_n}\simeq B^1[x_0,\ldots,x_{n-2}]$, the exact sequence of localization (and the homotopy invariance of the Witt cohomology, see [@Fa1 Theorem 11.2.9]) yields $$\xymatrix{0\ar[r] & H^0(B^n,W)\ar[r] & H^0(B^1,W)\ar[r] & H^1_{x_n}(B^n,W)\ar[r] & \ldots}$$ Using Lemma \[reg\_param\] and the computation of $H^i(B^1,W)$, we get an exact sequence $$\xymatrix{0\ar[r] & H^0(B^n,W)\ar[r] & \Z\oplus \Z\ar[r] & H^0(C^{n-2},W)\ar[r] & H^1(B^n,W)\ar[r] & 0}$$ and isomorphisms $H^{i-1}(C^{n-2},W)\simeq H^i(B^n,W)$ for $i\geq 2$. Since $C^0\simeq \C$, we have $H^{i-1}(C^0,W)=0$ for $i\geq 2$ and Lemma \[comput\_c1\] shows that the same statement is true for $C^1$. Hence $H^i(B^n,W)=0$ for $i\geq 2$ and it suffices to prove that the map $\Z\oplus \Z\to H^0(C^{n-2},W)$ in the above exact sequence is surjective to conclude. The two generators of $H^0(B^1,W)\simeq \Z\oplus \Z$ are the class of $\langle 1\rangle$ and $\langle x_n\rangle$. Now it is not hard to see that $\langle x_n\rangle$ is sent to the generator of $H^0(C^{n-2},W)$ (which is either $\Z/2$ or $\Z/4$) under the map $\Z\oplus \Z\to H^0(C^{n-2},W)$. Whence the result.
Next we compute part of the Witt cohomology of $B^3_{x_2+x_3}$. It is of course also possible to compute $H^0(B^3_{x_{2}+x_3},W)$, but the answer is not “nice” and we won’t need it.
\[comput\_b3\] We have $$H^i(B^3_{x_2+x_3},W)=\left\{ \begin{array}{cl}
\Z/2 & \mbox{if $i=1$,}\\
0 & \mbox{if $i\geq 2$.}
\end{array}\right.$$
Since we already know the Witt cohomology groups of $B^3$ (Lemma \[comput\_bn\]) and $B^3/(x_2+x_3)=C^2$ (Lemma \[comput\_c2\]), we only have to use the exact sequence of localization. The connecting homomorphism yields isomorphisms $H^i(B^3_{x_2+x_3},W)\simeq H^i(C^2)$ for $i=1,2,3$. This shows the assertion.
\[explicit\_b3\] We can give an explicit generator of $H^1(B^3_{x_2+x_3},W)$. Consider the prime ideals $\mathfrak q_1=(x_0^2+1)$ and $\mathfrak q_2=(x_2)$. Taking the Koszul complexes associated to these regular sequences as generators of respectively $\exten 1{B^3_{\mathfrak q_1}}{\kappa({\mathfrak q_1})}{B^3_{\mathfrak q_1}}$ and $\exten 1{B^3_{\mathfrak q_2}}{\kappa({\mathfrak q_2})}{B^3_{\mathfrak q_2}}$, we get symmetric isomorphisms $$\rho_{x_0^2+1}:\kappa({\mathfrak q_1})\to \exten 1{B^3_{\mathfrak q_1}}{\kappa({\mathfrak q_1})}{B^3_{\mathfrak q_1}}$$ and $$\rho_{x_2}:\kappa({\mathfrak q_2})\to \exten 1{B^3_{\mathfrak q_2}}{\kappa({\mathfrak q_2})}{B^3_{\mathfrak q_2}}$$ as in Remark \[explicit\_c2\]. Consider the element $(\kappa({\mathfrak q_1}),(x_0x_1+x_2)\rho_{x_0^2+1})+(\kappa({\mathfrak q_2}), x_1x_3\rho_{x_2})$ in $\bigoplus_{x_1\in \spec {B^3}^{(1)}}W(\kappa(x_1))$. A straightforward computation shows that the element $(\kappa({\mathfrak q_2}), x_1x_3\rho_{x_2})$ is ramified exactly in the prime ideals $(x_1,x_2)$ and $(x_2,x_3)$ (which is the same as $(x_2,x_2+x_3)$). On the other hand, $(\kappa({\mathfrak q_1}),(x_0x_1+x_2)\rho_{x_0^2+1})$ is ramified in both $(x_1,x_2)$ and in the prime ideal $\mathfrak p_1$ of Remark \[explicit\_c2\]. Indeed, the equality in $B^3$ $$(x_0x_1+x_2)(x_0x_1-x_2)-(x_0^2+1)(x_1^2+1)+x_2(x_2+x_3)=0$$ shows that a prime ideal containing $(x_0x_1+x_2)$ and $x_0^2+1$ must contain either $x_2$, either $x_2+x_3$. Such an ideal must therefore contain $(x_1,x_2)$ in the first case, and $(x_2+x_3, x_0^2+1,x_0x_1+x_2)=\mathfrak p_1$ (seen as an ideal in $B^3$) in the second case.
To check that $(\kappa({\mathfrak q_1}),(x_0x_1+x_2)\rho_{x_0^2+1})+(\kappa({\mathfrak q_2}), x_1x_3\rho_{x_2})$ indeed defines a class in $H^1(B^3_{x_2+x_3},W)$, we must compute its image under the differential in the Gersten-Witt complex associated to $B^3_{x_2+x_3}$. The image of $(\kappa({\mathfrak q_1}),(x_0x_1+x_2)\rho_{x_0^2+1})$ is the localization in the minimal prime ideals of its support of the complete intersection module $M_1:=B^3_{x_2+x_3}/(x_0^2+1,x_0x_1+x_2)$ endowed with the symmetric isomorphism $$\rho_{x_0^2+1,x_0x_1+x_2}:M_1\to \exten 2{B^3_{x_2+x_3}}{M_1}{B^3_{x_2+x_3}}$$ defined by $\rho_{x_0^2+1,x_0x_1+x_2}(1)=Kos(x_0^2+1,x_0x_1+x_2)$, where the latter is the Koszul complex given by the regular sequence $(x_0^2+1,x_0x_1+x_2)$. It follows from the discussion above that the only minimal prime ideal in the support of $M_1$ is $(x_1,x_2)$. To compute the localization of $M_1$ and $\rho_{x_0^2+1,x_0x_1+x_2}$ in the prime ideal $(x_1,x_2)$ we compare the regular sequences $(x_0^2+1,x_0x_1+x_2)$ and $(x_1,x_2)$. Since $x_0^2+1=x_2x_3-x_1^2$ in $B^3$, we get $$\begin{pmatrix} -x_1 & x_3 \\ x_0 & 1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} x_0^2+1 \\ x_0x_1+x_2\end{pmatrix}.$$ The determinant of the matrix is $-x_1-x_0x_3$, which is not in the ideal $(x_1,x_2)$ and therefore the regular sequences $(x_0^2+1,x_0x_1+x_2)$ and $(x_1,x_2)$ generate the same ideal in $B^3_{(x_1,x_2)}$ and $Kos(x_0^2+1,x_0x_1+x_2)=(-x_1-x_0x_3)Kos(x_1,x_2)$. Since the residue field at the prime ideal $(x_1,x_2)$ is $\C(x_3)$ and the class of $-x_1-x_0x_3$ in this field is $-ix_3$, we see that the image of $(\kappa({\mathfrak q_1}),(x_0x_1+x_2)\rho_{x_0^2+1})$ under the differential in the Gersten-Witt complex is the symmetric isomorphism $$\C(x_3)\to \exten 2{B^3_{(x_1,x_2)}}{\C(x_3)}{B^3_{(x_1,x_2)}}$$ defined by $1\mapsto -ix_3Kos(x_1,x_2)$. Since $-i$ is a square, this is equivalent to the symmetric isomorphism $$\C(x_3)\to \exten 2{B^3_{(x_1,x_2)}}{\C(x_3)}{B^3_{(x_1,x_2)}}$$ defined by $1\mapsto x_3Kos(x_1,x_2)$. It is easy to check that the image of $(\kappa({\mathfrak q_2}), x_1x_3\rho_{x_2})$ is the symmetric isomorphism $$\C(x_3)\to \exten 2{B^3_{(x_1,x_2)}}{\C(x_3)}{B^3_{(x_1,x_2)}}$$ defined by $1\mapsto x_3Kos(x_2,x_1)$. Since $Kos(x_1,x_2)=-Kos(x_2,x_1)$, we see that $(\kappa({\mathfrak q_1}),(x_0x_1+x_2)\rho_{x_0^2+1})+(\kappa({\mathfrak q_2}), x_1x_3\rho_{x_2})$ indeed defines an element of the group $H^1(B^3_{x_2+x_3},W)$.
We next show that its image under the isomorphism $$H^1(B^3_{x_2+x_3},W)\to H^1(C^2,W)$$ is precisely the generator obtained in Remark \[explicit\_c2\]. We start with the computation of the image of $(\kappa({\mathfrak q_1}),(x_0x_1+x_2)\rho_{x_0^2+1})$. Arguing as above and using the equality $$(x_0x_1+x_2)(x_0x_1-x_2)=(x_0^2+1)(x_1^2+1)-x_2(x_2+x_3)$$ we see that $Kos(x_0^2+1,x_0x_1+x_2)=-x_2/(x_0x_1-x_2)Kos(x_0^2+1,x_2+x_3)$ in $\exten 2{B^3_{\mathfrak p_1}}{\kappa(\mathfrak p_1)}{B^3_{\mathfrak p_1}}$. Since $(x_0x_1-x_2)=-2x_2$ in $\kappa(\mathfrak p_1)$ (because $x_0x_1+x_2$ is in $\mathfrak p_1$) and $-1/2$ is a square, we see that the image of $(\kappa({\mathfrak q_1}),(x_0x_1+x_2)\rho_{x_0^2+1})$ is precisely the element $(\kappa(\mathfrak p_1),\rho_{x_0^2+1})$ defined in Remark \[explicit\_c2\]. It remains to compute the image of $(\kappa({\mathfrak q_2}), x_1x_3\rho_{x_2})$, but this is straightforward.
Witt cohomology of $S^2$
------------------------
Let $S^2=\R[x_0,x_1,x_2]/(\sum x_i^2-1)$. As in [@DF], we use the stereographic projection to compute the Witt cohomology of $S^2$ (and therefore its Witt groups). Explicitly, consider the algebra $\R[x_0,x_1]$ and the polynomial $f=x_0^2+x_1^2+1$. Then there is an isomorphism $$S^2_{1-x_2}\to \R[x_0,x_1]_{f}$$ defined by $x_i\mapsto 2x_i/f$ for $i=0,1$ and $x_2\mapsto (f-2)/f$. Using the exact sequence of localization (see [@BalSurvey Theorem 1.5.5]), we get an exact sequence $$\xymatrix@C=1.4em{0\ar[r] & H^0(S^2,W)\ar[r] & H^0(S^2_{1-x_2},W)\ar[r] & H^1_{1-x_2}(S^2,W)\ar[r] & H^1(S^2,W)\ar[r] & \ldots}$$ First we compute the Witt cohomology of $S^2_{1-x_2}$, which is the same as the Witt cohomology of $\R[x_0,x_1]_{f}$. Using the localization sequence again, we have an exact sequence: $$\xymatrix@C=1.4em{0\ar[r] & H^0(\A^2,W)\ar[r] & H^0(\R[x_0,x_1]_{f},W)\ar[r] & H^1_f(\A^2,W)\ar[r] & H^1(\A^2,W)\ar[r] & \ldots}$$ By homotopy invariance, $H^0(\A^2,W)=\Z$ and $H^i(\A^2,W)=0$ if $i\geq 1$. Because $f$ is a regular parameter and $\R[x_0,x_1]/{f}=C^1$, we have $H^i_f(\A^2,W)\simeq H^{i-1}(C^1,W)$ by Lemma \[reg\_param\].
The sequence and Lemma \[comput\_c1\] imply that $H^i(\R[x_0,x_1]_f,W)=0$ if $i\geq 1$. To compute $H^0(\R[x_0,x_1]_f)$, observe that the map $H^0(\R,W)\to H^0(\R[x_0,x_1]_f,W)$ admits a retraction given by the choice of any rational point. Therefore we get $H^0(\R[x_0,x_1]_f,W)\simeq \Z\oplus \Z/4$, the factor $\Z/4$ being generated by the class of the form $\langle f\rangle$.
It remains to compute the groups $H^i_{1-x_2}(S^2,W)$. Remark that $1-x_2$ is a regular parameter in $S^2_{x_1}$ and that $S^2_{x_1}/(1-x_2)\simeq \C[x_1,x_1^{-1}]$. Again, we have an exact sequence of localization $$\xymatrix@C=1.4em{0\ar[r] & H^1_{1-x_2}(S^2,W)\ar[r] & H^1_{1-x_2}(S^2_{x_1},W)\ar[r] & H^2_{1-x_2,x_1}(S^2,W)\ar[r] & \ldots.}$$ Now the only point of codimension $2$ with support on $(1-x_2,x_1)$ is the maximal ideal $(1-x_2,x_1,x_0)$ and then $H^2_{1-x_2,x_1}(S^2,W)\simeq \Z$. Since $1-x_2$ is a regular parameter in $S^2_{x_1}$, we get $$H^1_{1-x_2}(S^2_{x_1},W)\simeq H^0(S^2_{x_1}/(1-x_2),W)\simeq H^0(\C[x_1,x_1^{-1}],W)\simeq \Z/2 \oplus \Z/2,$$ the second factor being generated by the class of the form $\langle x_1\rangle$ ([@Gi1 Theorem 5.6]). We also get $H^2_{1-x_2}(S^2_{x_1},W)=0$ and therefore $H^2_{1-x_2}(S^2,W)\simeq \Z$.
Finally, we can compute the Witt cohomology of $S^2$:
\[s2\] Let $S^2$ be the algebraic real $2$-sphere. Then $$H^i(S^2,W)\simeq \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \Z\oplus \Z/2 & \mbox{if $i=0$}\\
\Z/2 & \mbox{if $i=1$}\\
\Z & \mbox{if $i=2$}\\
0 & \mbox{if $i\geq 3$}
\end{array}\right.$$
We just have to examine the exact sequence $$\xymatrix@C=1.4em{0\ar[r] & H^0(S^2,W)\ar[r] & H^0(S^2_{1-x_2},W)\ar[r] & H^1_{1-x_2}(S^2,W)\ar[r] & H^1(S^2,W)\ar[r] & \ldots}$$ In light of the above computations, the only difficulty is to understand the map $H^0(S^2_{1-x_2},W)\to H^1_{1-x_2}(S^2,W)$. But it is not hard to see that the form $\langle 1-x_2\rangle$ generating the factor $\Z/4$ in $H^0(S^2_{1-x_2},W)$ is sent to the form $\langle 1\rangle$ generating the first $\Z/2$ factor in $H^1_{1-x_2}(S^2,W)$.
\[explicit\_s2\] Let $\mathfrak q$ be the prime ideal of $S^2$ generated by $(1-x_2)$. The Koszul complex $Kos(1-x_2)$ associated to $(1-x_2)$ can be taken as a generator of $\exten 1{S^2_{\mathfrak q}}{\kappa(\mathfrak q)}{S^2_{\mathfrak q}}$ and we get a symmetric isomorphism $$\rho_{1-x_2}:\kappa(\mathfrak q)\to \exten 1{S^2_{\mathfrak q}}{\kappa(\mathfrak q)}{S^2_{\mathfrak q}}$$ defined by $\rho_{1-x_2}(1)=Kos(1-x_2)$. Our computations above proves that a generator of $H^1(S^2,W)$ is given by the class of the cycle $(\kappa(\mathfrak q),x_1\rho_{1-x_2})$.
The computation of $W^2(S^3)$
-----------------------------
We finally compute $W^2(S^3)\simeq H^2(S^3,W)$. To achieve this, we use our computations of the previous sections.
\[s3prime\] Let $S^3$ be the algebraic real $3$-sphere. Then $W^2(S^3)=0$.
We use the localization sequence $$\xymatrix@C=1.2em{\ldots\ar[r] & H^1(S^3,W)\ar[r] & H^1(S^3_{x_3},W)\ar[r] & H^2_{x_3}(S^3,W)\ar[r] & H^2(S^3,W)\ar[r] & H^2(S^3_{x_3},W).}$$ Since $S^3_{x_3}\simeq B^3_{x_2+x_3}$, we get $H^2(S^3_{x_3},W)=0$ by Lemma \[comput\_b3\]. Using Lemma \[reg\_param\], we get an isomorphism $H^2_{x_3}(S^3,W)\simeq H^1(S^2,W)$. The above exact sequence reduces then to an exact sequence $$\xymatrix@C=1.2em{\ldots\ar[r] & H^1(S^3,W)\ar[r] & H^1(S^3_{x_3},W)\ar[r] & H^1(S^2,W)\ar[r] & H^2(S^3,W)\ar[r] & 0.}$$ It suffices therefore to prove that the homomorphism $H^1(S^3_{x_3},W)\to H^1(S^2,W)$ is surjective to conclude. Using the isomorphism $\phi:B^3_{x_2+x_3}\to S^3_{x_3}$ and the explicit generator of Remark \[explicit\_b3\], we get an explicit generator of $H^1(S^3_{x_3},W)$ as follows:
We get $\phi(\mathfrak q_1)=(x_0^2+x_3^2)=:\mathfrak q_1^\prime$ and $$\phi(Kos(x_0^2+1))=Kos(x_0^2/x_3^2+1)=(1/x_3^2)Kos(x_0^2+x_3^2).$$ Moreover, $\phi(x_0x_1+x_2)=(1/x_3^2)(x_0x_1+(1-x_2)x_3)$. Letting $\rho_{x_0^2+x_3^2}$ be the usual symmetric isomorphism, we see that the image of $(\kappa(\mathfrak q_1),(x_0x_1+x_2)\rho_{x_0^2+1})$ under $\phi$ is $(\kappa(\mathfrak q_1^\prime),(x_0x_1+(1-x_2)x_3)\rho_{x_0^2+x_3^2})$ (since we work in a Witt group, we can forget the factors $(1/x_3^2)$).
Similarly, we get $\phi(\mathfrak q_2)=(1-x_2)=:\mathfrak q_2^\prime$, $\phi(Kos(x_2))=(1/x_3)Kos(1-x_2)$ and $\phi(x_1x_3)=(1/x_3^2)x_1(1+x_2)$. Hence the image of $(\kappa(\mathfrak q_2),x_1x_3\rho_{x_2})$ under $\phi$ is $(\kappa(\mathfrak q_2^\prime),x_1x_3\rho_{1-x_2})$ since $1+x_2\equiv 2$ modulo $\mathfrak q_2^\prime$ and $2$ is a square.
We are therefore reduced to compute the image of $$(\kappa(\mathfrak q_1^\prime),(x_0x_1+(1-x_2)x_3)\rho_{x_0^2+x_3^2})+ (\kappa(\mathfrak q_2^\prime),x_1x_3\rho_{1-x_2})$$ under the homomorphism $H^1(S^3_{x_3},W)\to H^1(S^2,W)$. A direct computation shows that the image of $(\kappa(\mathfrak q_1^\prime),(x_0x_1+(1-x_2)x_3)\rho_{x_0^2+x_3^2})$ is trivial, while the image of $(\kappa(\mathfrak q_2^\prime),x_1x_3\rho_{1-x_2})$ is the cycle $(\kappa(\mathfrak q),x_1\rho_{1-x_2})$ of Remark \[explicit\_s2\]. Hence the homomorphism $H^1(S^3_{x_3},W)\to H^1(S^2,W)$ is surjective and the result is proved.
\[s3\] Let $S^3$ be the algebraic real $3$-sphere. Then $\K {S^3}=0$.
It is well-known that $K_0(S^3)=\Z$ (using the fact that in this case the algebraic $K$-theory and the topological $K$-theory coincide by [@Sw2 Theorem 3]), and therefore we get $\K {S^3}=W^2(S^3)$ by definition.
Projective modules on $S^3$
---------------------------
Now we have all the tools in hand to prove the following theorem:
\[main\] Every finitely generated projective module over the real algebraic $3$-sphere is free.
Because $K_0(S^3)=0$, all the projective modules are stably free. We know already that those of rank $3$ are free by [@Fa4 Proposition 5.11]. In view of Theorem \[cancellation\] and our computation of $\K {S^3}$, it remains to show that $Um_4(S^3)/Sp_4(S^3)$ is trivial. By [@Fa4 Theorem 4.9, Theorem 5.6], the group $Um_4(S^3)/E_4(S^3)$ is generated by the class of the unimodular row $(x_0,x_1,x_2,x_3)$. Now the matrix $$M:=\begin{pmatrix} x_0 & x_1 & x_2 & x_3 \\
-x_1 & x_0 & -x_3 & x_2 \\
-x_2 & x_3 & x_0 & -x_1 \\
-x_3 & -x_2 & x_1 & x_0\end{pmatrix}$$ is in $\Sp {S^3}\subset SL_4(S^3)$. Mapping a matrix (of determinant $1$) to its first row yields a homomorphism of abelian groups $$r:SL_4(S^3)/E_4(S^3)\to Um_4(S^3)/E_4(S^3)$$ by [@vdk Theorem 5.3(ii)]. It follows that for any $[v]$ in $Um_4(S^3)/E_4(S^3)$ there exists $n\in \Z$ such that $[v]=r(M^n)$. This yields $[v]+r(M^{-n})=0$ and then $vM^{-n}=e_1E$ for some $E\in E_4(S^3)$. Now $e_1E_4(S^3)=e_1ESp_4(S^3)$ by Vaserstein’s theorem (whose french translation can be found in [@Bass3 Proposition 6’]). This proves that $v\in e_1Sp_4(S^3)$. Whence the result.
Acknowledgements
================
It is a pleasure to thank Manuel Ojanguren for stimulating my interest in the subject. I also wish to express my gratitude to the referee for his comments and corrections.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We investigate a finite two–dimensional system in the presence of external magnetic field. We discuss how the energy spectrum depends on the system size, boundary conditions and Coulomb repulsion. On one hand, using these results we present the field dependence of the transport properties of a nanosystem. In particular, we demonstrate that these properties depend on whether the system consists of even or odd number of sites. On the other hand, on the basis of exact results obtained for a finite system we investigate whether the Hofstadter butterfly is robust against strong electronic correlations. We show that for sufficiently strong Coulomb repulsion the Hubbard gap decreases when the magnetic field increases.'
author:
- 'Katarzyna Czajka, Anna Gorczyca, Maciej M. Ma[ś]{}ka, and Marcin Mierzejewski'
title: Hofstadter butterfly for a finite correlated system
---
73.22.-f, 73.63.-b, 71.70.Di
Introduction
============
The problem of electrons moving in a periodic potential under the influence of an external magnetic field has been investigated since the beginning of quantum mechanics. Despite the seeming simplicity of the problem, many its aspects still remain unresolved. Even in the absence of electronic correlations solutions are known only in limiting cases. In particular, two dimensional (2D) electron gas under the influence of a periodic potential and a perpendicular magnetic field can be described in two limits, one of a weak and the other of a strong periodic potential. In the former case the applied magnetic field is the main factor that determines the behavior of electrons. As a result the electronic wave functions are Landau level–like, with the degeneracy lifted by the periodic potential. If the potential is modulated in one dimension, the width of the resulting “Landau bands” oscillates with the magnetic field as a consequence of commensurability between the cyclotron diameter and the period of potential modulation. It leads to oscillations in magnetoresistance, known as the Weiss oscillations.[@Weiss] If the potential is modulated in two dimensions, “minigaps” open in the “Landau bands”, and the energy spectrum plotted versus the applied field composes the famous Hofstadter butterfly.[@langbein; @Hofstadter] It is interesting, that the same spectrum occurs in a complementary limit, when the lattice potential is very strong, and the electronic wave functions are Bloch–like, modified by the magnetic field.[@langbein]
The simplest model for the case, when an applied field and a lattice potential are present simultaneously, is commonly referred to as the Hofstadter or Azbel–Hofstadter model.[@Hofstadter; @Azbel] The corresponding Hamiltonian describes electrons on a two–dimensional square lattice with nearest–neighbor hopping in a perpendicular uniform magnetic field. The Schrödinger equation takes the form of a one–dimensional difference equation, known as the Harper equation (or the almost Mathieu equation).[@Harper; @Hofstadter; @Rauh] It is also a model for a one–dimensional electronic system in two incommensurate periodic potentials. The Harper equation also has links to many other areas of interest, e.g., the quantum Hall effect,[@Albrecht] quasicrystals, localization–delocalization phenomena,[@bellissard; @guarneri] the noncommutative geometry,[@bellissard1] the renormalization group,[@thouless1; @wilkinson] the theory of fractals, the number theory, and the functional analysis.[@last1] It is also useful in determining the upper critical field [@mmmm2; @mmmm1; @mmmm3; @dmm] and the pseudogap closing field [@mmmm4] in high–temperature superconductors.
The unusual structure of the Hofstadter butterfly is a characteristic feature of 2D systems. Similarly to the case of Landau levels the dimensionality of the system is of crucial importance for the Hofstadter butterfly. Movement of electrons along the external magnetic field would be responsible for broadening of the Hofstadter bands. They eventually may overlap and, in this way, smear out the original fractal structure of the energy spectrum. On the other hand it is known, that electronic properties of low dimensional systems may be completely changed by the presence of electronic correlations. In particular, it is well known for 1D systems that perturbation theory breaks down and arbitrarily weak on-site Coulomb repulsion qualitatively changes the whole excitation spectrum from the Fermi to Luttinger liquid type. The role of Coulomb interaction in the case of 2D lattice has intensively been investigated in connection with high temperature superconductors. Although a complete description of the correlated 2D system is still missing, it became obvious that mean-field approaches are invalid even for moderate values of Coulomb repulsion. Therefore, a question arises, whether the fine structure of the Hofstadter butterfly is robust against the presence of electronic correlations. This problem has previously been investigated on a mean–field level.[@gg; @doh] In particular, the analysis presented in Ref. suggests that also in the presence of electronic correlations the energy levels should form the Hofstadter butterfly with additional energy gap in the middle of the energy spectrum. However, the mentioned above limitations of the mean-field results clearly show, that these results do not represent a conclusive solution. In this paper we address this problem with the help of a method that is particularly suited for investigations of the low dimensional correlated systems, i.e, exact diagonalization of finite clusters. Although in this method short-range electronic correlations are exactly taken into account, finite size effects will seriously affect the energy spectrum. These modifications can be of special importance, when the system is under influence of magnetic field.[@anal1; @anal2] In order to separate the correlations and size–induced effects we start our investigations with a finite uncorrelated system and discuss both fixed (fbc) and periodic boundary conditions (pbc). Apart from the discussion of the Hofstadter butterfly these results may be applicable to investigations of nanosystems in the presence of magnetic field, where fixed boundary conditions are more appropriate than the periodic ones.
![(Color online). Density of states, $\rho(E)$, as a function of the magnetic field ($\alpha$) calculated with fixed (left column) and periodic (right column) boundary conditions \[see Eq. (\[rhodef\])\]. The brighter colors correspond to larger values of the density of states. The first, second and third row shows results obtained for a $6 \times 6$, $12 \times 12$ and $30 \times 30$ cluster, respectively. The broadening of the one–particle levels $\eta=0.05t$ has been assumed. In the last row we magnify the regions marked above. In order to demonstrate the presence of the edge states, the broadening has been reduced to $\eta=0.005t$. []{data-label="result"}](fig1.eps){width="8.2cm"}
Finite–size effects
===================
For the sake of completeness, we start with a brief derivation of the Harper equation for the gauge $ {\bf A}=B\left(-ay,(1-a)x,0 \right) $. Here, the parameter $a \in (0,1)$ allows one to distinguish between the Landau ($a=0$) and symmetric gauges ($a=1/2$). The 2D square lattice in the presence of external, perpendicular magnetic field can be described by the tight–binding Hamiltonian: $$\begin{aligned}
H=t\sum_{x,y,\sigma} \left({\mathrm {e}}^{ i \phi_x y}c_{(x,y)\sigma}^{\dagger}
c_{(x-1,y)\sigma}+{\mathrm {e}}^{- i \phi_x y}c_{(x,y)\sigma}^{\dagger}
c_{(x+1,y)\sigma}\right .&&\nonumber \\
+ \left.{\mathrm {e}}^{- i \phi_y x} c_{(x,y)\sigma}^{\dagger}c_{(x,y-1)\sigma}
+{\mathrm {e}}^{ i \phi_y x}c_{(x,y)\sigma}^{\dagger}c_{(x,y+1)\sigma}\right),
\nonumber \\
\label{hamu0}\end{aligned}$$ where $c^{\dagger}_{(x,y)\sigma}$ creates an electron with spin $\sigma$ at the site $(x,y)$ and $t$ is the nearest–neighbor hopping integral in the absence of magnetic field. $\phi_x=2 \pi \alpha a $, $\phi_y=2 \pi \alpha (1-a) $, $\alpha= \Phi/\Phi_{0} $, where $\Phi$ is the magnetic flux through the lattice cell and $\Phi_0$ is the flux quantum. In order to determine eigenfunctions of this Hamiltonian, formally one should solve a 2D eigenproblem. However, in the case of the Landau gauge ($a=0$), the hopping integrals in Eq. (\[hamu0\]) depend solely on the $x$ coordinate. Because of the translational invariance along the $y$ axis, eigenfunctions exhibit a plane–wave behavior in this direction \[$\exp(i k y)$\]. This argumentation can be extended to a more general gauge. Such an extension requires an appropriate shift of the momentum $k$. For a $N_x \times N_y$ lattice with pbc, we introduce fermionic operators $c_{x,k,\sigma}^{\dagger}$ defined by $$c_{(x,y)\sigma}^{\dagger}=
\frac{1}{\sqrt{N_{y}}}\sum_{k}{\mathrm{e}}^{-iy \left(k+\phi_x x\right) }c_{x,k,\sigma}^{\dagger}.$$ The Hamiltonian (1) can then be written: $$\begin{aligned}
H&=&t \sum_{x,k,\sigma} \left(c_{x,k,\sigma}^{\dagger}c_{x+1,k,\sigma}+
c_{x,k,\sigma}^{\dagger}c_{x-1,k,\sigma}
\right. \nonumber \\
& &\left. \qquad \mbox{}+
2{\mathrm{cos}}(k- 2 \pi \alpha x)c_{x,k,\sigma}^{\dagger}c_{x,k,\sigma}
\right).
\label{ham3D}\end{aligned}$$ The resulting Hamiltonian is diagonal in the quantum numbers $k$ and tridiagonal in the $x$-coordinates. It means that the applied 1D transformation to the momentum space, allows one to reduce the original 2D eigenproblem \[Eq. (\[hamu0\])\] to a 1D one. In the following we study whether such a reduction is possible also for a finite system with fixed boundary conditions. The relevant wave–function in this case is no longer the plane-wave, since it must vanish at the system edges. It is easy to check, that the Hamiltonian of a 1D chain with fbc can be diagonalized with the help of the transformation $
c_{y,\sigma}^{\dagger} \sim \sum_{k}{\mathrm{sin}}(ky)c_{k,\sigma}^{\dagger}
$. In the case of a 2D lattice in the presence of the external magnetic field, an appropriate shift of the wave–vectors allows one to cancel the Peierls phase factors for the hopping along the $y$-axis: $$c_{(x,y)\sigma}^{\dagger}=\sqrt{\frac{2}{N_{y}+1}}\sum_{k}{\mathrm{sin}}(ky)c_{x,k,\sigma}^{\dagger}
{\mathrm e}^{2 \pi i \alpha xy},$$ where the wave–vectors $$k = \frac{\pi}{N_{y}+1},\;\frac{2\pi }{N_{y}+1},\;\dots,\;\frac{N_{y}\pi}{N_{y}+1}.$$ In the above equation we have assumed $a=1$. Generalization to arbitrary value of $a$ is straightforward.
The orthogonality relation $$\sum_{y}{\mathrm{sin}}(ky){\mathrm{sin}}(py)=\frac{N_{y}+1}{2}\delta_{kp}$$ allows one to carry out the inverse transformation. Then, the Hamiltonian takes the form $$\begin{aligned}
H=t \sum_{k,\sigma} \Bigg(
\sum_{x=1}^{N_{x}-1}\sum_{y=1}^{N_{y}}
\frac{2}{N_{y}+1}\sum_{p}{\mathrm{sin}}(ky) {\mathrm{sin}}(py)\times && \\
\Big({\mathrm{e}}^{- 2\pi i \alpha y}c_{x,k,\sigma}^{\dagger}c_{x+1,p,\sigma}+h.c. \Big)+
\sum_{x=1}^{N_{x}}2{\mathrm{cos}}(k)c_{x,k,\sigma}^{\dagger}c_{x,k,\sigma} \Bigg). &&\end{aligned}$$ Only the term responsible for the hopping along the $y$-axis is diagonal in $k$, whereas the remaining hopping term is generally not. Therefore, contrary to the case of infinite lattice with pbc, the Hamiltonian cannot be reduced to a form that is diagonal in wave-vectors and tridiagonal in real space coordinates. The only exceptions occur for $\alpha=0$ and $\alpha=1/2$. The first case is trivial. In the latter case ($\alpha=1/2$), an additional transformation $$c_{x,k,\sigma} \rightarrow \frac{1}{2}c_{x,k,\sigma}\left(1+(-1)^{x}\right)
-\frac{1}{2}c_{x,\pi-k,\sigma}\left(1-(-1)^{x}\right),$$ leads to the Hamiltonian in the form given by Eq. (\[ham3D\]). However, since $k \in (-\pi,\pi)$ for pbc and $k \in (0,\pi)$ for fbc, also in this case the energy spectrum depends on the boundary conditions. Consequently, degeneracy of the energy levels is lower for fbc than for pbc. An additional difference, that immediately follows from the analytical calculations, is related to the density of states $\rho(\epsilon)$ for $\alpha=1/2$. In the case of infinite system with pbc $\rho(0)=0$, whereas for a finite lattice with fbc there exists an eigenvalue $\epsilon=0$, provided the system consists of odd number of sites. The proof of this statement is straightforward and, therefore, we omit the details. The difference between systems with even and odd number of sites will be discussed in more details in connection with the transport properties. In Fig. 1 we compare the density of states obtained for various boundary conditions and lattice sizes. It has been calculated using the standard formula: $$\rho(E)=-\frac{1}{\pi N_x N_y} \sum_n \Im \frac{1}{E-\varepsilon_n+i \eta},
\label{rhodef}$$ where $\varepsilon_n$ is the energy of the $n$-th one–particle eigenstate.
In the presence of magnetic field the translation group of the lattice does not represent a symmetry group of the Hamiltonian and one can discuss periodicity only with respect to the magnetic translation group.[@zak; @floratos] Consequently, for a finite system one can apply the pbc only for some particular values of $\alpha$, which are determined by the system size. On the other hand, for fbc the energy levels can be calculated for arbitrary magnetic field, as it was demonstrated in Ref. . However, in order to compare directly results obtained for fbc and pbc, in both the cases we have used only these values of magnetic field, which are allowed for pbc. In the case of fbc there exist edge states, which are responsible for additional levels inside the energy gaps in the Hofstadter butterfly.[@levels_in_gaps] They are clearly visible in Fig. 1 in the density of states obtained for a $6\times 6$ system. The relative contribution of these states to $\rho(\epsilon)$ decreases with the system size. Therefore, they are much less visible in the density of states obtained for larger systems and become unimportant for an infinite lattice. However, for a finite system, they may qualitatively change the well known structure of the Hofstadter butterfly, obtained from the Harper equation.
Transport properties
--------------------
The above discussion can directly be applied to the investigations of transport properties of nanosystems. The field–induced modifications of the energy spectra lead to strong changes of the transport current, at least in the low voltage regime. We use the formalism of nonequilibrium Green functions to analyze these effects in a nanosystem coupled to leads. The coupling is described by: $$H_{\rm nano-el}=\sum_{{\bf k},x,y,\alpha,\sigma} \left(
g_{{\bf k} ,x,y,\alpha} d^\dagger_{{\bf k},\sigma,\alpha }c_{\left(x,y\right)\sigma}+{\rm H.c.}\right),$$ where $d^\dagger_{{\bf k},\sigma,\alpha} $ creates an electron with momentum ${\bf k}$ and spin $\sigma$ in the electrode $\alpha$. Here, $\alpha \in$ {L,R} indicates the left or right electrode. We assume a simple model in which the leads are described by a two–dimensional (2D) lattice gas and the hopping between the leads and nanosystem is possible only perpendicularly to the edge of the nanosystem. $g_{{\bf k},x,y,\alpha}$ is nonzero only for sites $(x,y)$ which are located at the edge $\alpha$ of the nanosystem. The details of calculations can be found in Refs. and . Figs. 2 and 3 show the field dependence of the transport current for various size of the nanosystem.
![(Color online) Field dependence of the transport current through the $5 \times 5$ and $6 \times 6$ nanosystems coupled to macroscopic leads for the applied voltage $eV=0.01t$. $I_0=2 e t/h$, where $e$ is the elementary charge and $h$ is the Planck constant. See Fig. 5 in Ref. for parameters and the details of the coupling between the nanosystem and the electrodes. The inset shows the field dependence of the one–particle eigenenergies located in the vicinity of $E=0$ obtained for an isolated nanosystem with fbc. []{data-label="result1"}](fig2.eps){width="8cm"}
![(Color online) Upper panel shows the field dependence of the transport current through the $5 \times 5$ and $6 \times 6$ nanosystems for the applied voltage $eV=0.01t$. Lower panel shows results obtained for $9 \times 9$ and $10 \times 10$ nanosystems with $eV=0.002t$. The remaining parameters are the same as in Fig. 2. []{data-label="result2"}](fig3a.eps "fig:"){width="8cm"} ![(Color online) Upper panel shows the field dependence of the transport current through the $5 \times 5$ and $6 \times 6$ nanosystems for the applied voltage $eV=0.01t$. Lower panel shows results obtained for $9 \times 9$ and $10 \times 10$ nanosystems with $eV=0.002t$. The remaining parameters are the same as in Fig. 2. []{data-label="result2"}](fig3b.eps "fig:"){width="8cm"}
Two main features arise from the presented results: (i) strong magnetoresistance in a weak field regime and (ii) even–odd parity effect. Both these features occur for a low voltage only. The first effect is shown in Fig. 2. It can easily be understood on the basis of the field dependence of the one–particle energies that are close to the Fermi energy, as presented in the inset in Fig. 2. One can see, that for low voltage the number of states which participate in the transport decreases when the magnetic field increases. This effect is due to a field–induced splitting of a strongly degenerated level at zero energy. This degeneracy, in turn, is a remnant of the van Hove singularity, that is a typical feature of an infinite 2D lattice. There is, however, a significant difference between systems with even and odd number of lattice sites. In the former case, strong magnetic field can completely remove states from the vicinity of the Fermi energy, what results in vanishing of the current. On the other hand, if there is an odd number of lattice sites, one state is always located at zero energy. As a result a finite conductivity occurs for arbitrary magnetic field. This parity effect originates from the facts that the energy spectrum is symmetric with respect to the zero energy and the number of energy levels is equal to the number of lattice sites. The difference between systems consisting of even and odd number of sites is pronounced for $\alpha=1/2$, what can be seen in Fig. 3. The even–odd parity effect is a well known feature of persistent currents in mesoscopic rings, where it occurs due to its nontrivial first homotopy group.[@ring] Here, we have demonstrated that a similar effect may occur also in a nanosystem with a trivial topology: in an isolated nanosystem as well as in a system coupled to a macroscopic leads. In the first case it shows up in the energy spectrum, whereas in the latter case it is visible also in the transport properties. An additional similarity between rings and the systems under investigation concerns the fact, that the parity effect occurs only in small systems and disappears in the thermodynamic limit.
The role of correlations
========================
{width="16cm"}
After establishing the role of boundary conditions and its significance for the properties of nanosystems, we switch to the main question, whether the Hofstadter energy spectrum is robust against the presence of strong electronic correlations. Both the external magnetic field and electronic correlations give rise to opening of the energy gaps in the density of states. One could expect that these mechanism should independently contribute to the opening of these gaps. In the following, we demonstrate that this intuitive statement is wrong and, actually, external magnetic field reduces the Hubbard energy gap. In order to investigate this problem, we consider the 2D Hubbard model in the presence of magnetic field: $$H_{{\mathrm Hubb}}=H_{\mathrm kin}+U \sum_{x,y} n_{\left(x,y\right) \uparrow} n_{\left(x,y\right) \downarrow},$$ where the kinetic term is given by Eq. (\[hamu0\]) and the electron number operator $ n_{\left(x,y\right)\sigma}=c_{(x,y)\sigma}^{\dagger}c_{(x,y)\sigma}$. In the following we investigate the half–filled case, when the Hubbard gap opens at the Fermi level, driving the system from a metallic state to an insulating one.
This Hamiltonian has exactly been diagonalized mostly by means of the Lanczös method. It is one of the most effective computational tools for searching for the ground state and some low laying excited states of a finite system. We start with a system sufficiently small to allow one to determine the whole energy spectrum. In the case of finite system calculations pbc can be applied only for specific values of the magnetic field, which depend on the cluster size. Therefore, in the following we use the fbc. Fig. 4 shows how the density of states depends on the magnetic field and the magnitude of the Coulomb repulsion. One can see, that for weak to moderate Coulomb repulsion its influence on the density of states strongly depends on the applied magnetic field. In the absence of magnetic field ($\alpha=0$) even relatively weak electronic correlations ($U=2t$) strongly modify the energy spectrum. On the other hand, for strong magnetic field the density of states becomes robust against the Coulomb correlations. In particular, for $\alpha=1/2$ densities of states obtained for $U=0$ and $U=2t$ hardly differ from each other. This result already suggests that Coulomb interaction modifies various parts of the Hofstadter butterfly in a different way. It remains in contradiction to the results obtained in the mean-field analysis.[@doh] In the latter approach the Coulomb repulsion opens an almost field independent gap in the middle of the Hofstadter butterfly. Additionally, the one-particle energies remain in the range $(-4t,4t)$, at least for moderate $U$, i.e., the electronic correlations do not change the spectrum width. It has also been reported in Ref. that for stronger Coulomb repulsion the only modifications of the Hofstadter butterfly concern the larger band gaps and narrower band widths. Contrary to the mean–field results, exact diagonalization method indicates that electronic correlations lead to a substantial modification of the density of states. First, there are excitation beyond the range $(-4t,4t)$. When $U$ increases the one-particle excitations are replaced by the collective ones with a finite live-time. Instead of the $\delta$–like peaks in the density of states we obtained much larger number of wider peaks, which eventually may overlap. Therefore, we expect that electronic correlations smear out the fine structure of the Hofstadter butterfly.
For the application purposes, the most important property concerns the density of states in the vicinity of Fermi level. Therefore, we restrict the following study only to the ground state and the lowest excited states. Especially, we analyze field dependence of the Hubbard gap $\Delta(U,\alpha)$ that opens in the middle of the density of states. In Fig 5. we present a reduced gap $\Delta^*(U,\alpha)=\Delta(U,\alpha)-\Delta(U,0)$, whereas $\Delta(U,0)$ is presented in the inset in this figure.
![(Color online) Magnitude of the reduced Hubbard gap ($\Delta^*(U,\alpha) $) as a function of $U$ for various magnetic fields. These results have been obtained for a $12$–site cluster with fbc.[]{data-label="result4"}](fig5.eps){width="8.5cm"}
As one could expected, $\Delta$ increases with $U$ for arbitrary magnetic field. However, the negative slope of $\Delta^*$ as a function of $U$ clearly indicates that this increase is smaller when the magnetic field is switched on. Finally for sufficiently strong Coulomb repulsion, the Hubbard gap seems to be a monotonically decreasing function of magnetic field for $\alpha \in (0,1/2)$. Since the Hamiltonian is invariant under the transformation $\alpha \rightarrow 1-\alpha$ the gap monotonically increases with $\alpha$, for $\alpha \in (1/2,1)$. This monotonic behavior is an unexpected result that strongly contrasts with the uncorrelated case, where the gap changes irregularly (discontinuously) with magnetic field, as can be inferred from Fig. 1.
The Hubbard model has already been applied for investigations of nanosystems, e.g., molecular wires[@bulka] and quantum dot arrays (see Ref. for a detailed discussion and estimation of the relevant model parameters). The latter case is of particular interest since the size of the elementary cell can be adjusted in such a way, that the flux through the cell can be of the order of the flux quantum and, then, the structure of the Hofstadter butterfly may be visible. Unfortunately, the present approach is probably oversimplified for a quantitative description of electronic correlation in the quantum dot arrays, where one should account for a large number of states per dot. In spite of this, the considered Hubbard Hamiltonian allows for at most two electrons per site. Additionally, we have restricted our considerations only to the on–site repulsion $U$, what corresponds to the intradot interaction. In a more realistic approach, an extended multiband Hubbard model with intersite interaction should be used, but such extensions are presently beyond the reach of the exact diagonalization techniques.
summary
=======
The structure of the Hofstadter butterfly arises due to coexistence of the periodic potential and the perpendicular magnetic field in the 2D electron gas. It is well known that the presence of Coulomb interaction in low dimensional systems is responsible for strong modification of its electronic properties. Motivated by these facts, we have investigated how the butterfly structure is affected by the correlations. In contrast to the mean–field results we have demonstrated that Coulomb correlations are responsible for broadening of the quasiparticle levels. As a result some of the Hofstadter bands overlap, and the fractal butterfly structure smears out. We have shown that for sufficiently strong repulsion the Hubbard gap monotonically decreases with the external magnetic field for $\alpha \in (0,1/2)$. This result strongly contrasts with the irregular behavior of the density of states in the uncorrelated case. Unfortunately, beyond the mean–field level, results can be obtained only for relatively small systems. We expect, however, that similar changes occur also in much larger systems. On the other hand, some of the results can directly be applied to the investigations of nanosystem, e.g. quantum dot arrays. The finite–size effects seriously modify field dependence of its transport properties. Similarly to the persistent currents in nano– and mesoscopic rings, also the transport currents are different in systems consisting of odd and even number of sites.
This work has been supported by the Polish Ministry of Education and Science under Grant No. 1 P03B 071 30.
[99]{} D. Weiss, K.v. Klitzing, K. Ploog, and G. Weimann, Europhys. Lett. [**8**]{}, 179 (1989). D. Langbein, Phys. Rev. [**180**]{}, 633 (1969). D. R. Hofstadter, Phys. Rev. B [**14**]{}, 2239 (1976). M. Ya. Azbel, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. [**46**]{}, 929 (1964). \[Sov. Phys. JETP [**19**]{}, 634 (1964)\]. P. G. Harper, Proc. Phys. Soc. Lond. A [**68**]{}, 874 (1955). A. Rauh, Phys. Status Solidi B [**65**]{}, 131 (1974); [**69**]{}, 9 (1975). C. Albrecht, J.H. Smet, K. von Klitzing, D. Weiss, V. Umansky, and H. Schweizer, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**86**]{}, 147 (2001). J. Bellissard and A. Barelli, in [*Quantum Chaos–Quantum Measurement*]{}, edited by P. Cvitanović, I. C. Percival and A. Wierzba (Kluwer, Dortrecht, 1992). I. Guarneri and F. Borgonovi, J. Phys. A [**119**]{}, (1993) J. Bellisard, in [*Operator Algebras and Application*]{}, edited by D. E. Evans and M. Takesaki (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988), Vol. 2. D. J. Thouless, Phys. Rev. B [**28**]{}, 4272 (1983). D. J. Wilkinson, J. Phys. A [**20**]{}, 4337 (1987). Y. Last, Commun. Math. Phys. [**164**]{}, 421 (1994); A. Avila and S. Jitomirskaya, arXiv.org:math/0503363 M. Mierzejewski and M. M. Maśka, Phys. Rev. B [**60**]{}, 6300 (1999). M. M. Maśka and M. Mierzejewski, Phys. Rev. B [**64**]{}, 064501 (2001). M. Mierzejewski and M. M. Maśka, Phys. Rev. B [**66**]{}, 214527 (2002). T. Domanski, M. M. Maśka, and M. Mierzejewski, Phys. Rev. B [**67**]{}, 134507 (2003). M. Mierzejewski and M. M. Maśka, Phys. Rev. B [**69**]{}, 054502 (2004). V. Gundmundsson and R.R. Gerhardts, Phys. Rev. [**52**]{}, 16744 (1995). H. Doh and S.-H. S. Salk, Phys. Rev. [**57**]{}, 1312 (1998). J.G. Analytis, S.J. Blundell, and A. Ardavan, J. Phys. IV France [**114**]{}, 283 (2004). J.G. Analytis, S.J. Blundell, and A. Ardavan, American J. Phys. [**72**]{}, 613 (2004). J. Zak, Phys. Rev. [**136**]{}, A 776 (1964). G.G. Athanasiu and E.G. Floratos, Phys. Lett. B [**352**]{}, 105 (1995). V. Moldoveanu, A. Aldea, and B. Tanatar, Phys. Rev. B [**70**]{}, 085303 (2004); U. Sivan, Y. Imry, and C. Hartzstein, Phys. Rev. B [**39**]{}, 1242 (1989). M. Mierzejewski and M. Ma[ś]{}ka, Phys. Rev. B [**73**]{}, 205103 (2006). T. Kostyrko and B. R. Bu[ł]{}ka, Phys. Rev. B [**67**]{}, 205331 (2003). M. Büttiker, Y. Imry and R. Landauer, Phys. Lett. [**96A**]{}, 365 (1983); K. Czajka, M.M. Ma[ś]{}ka, M. Mierzejewski, and [Ż]{}. [Ś]{}led[ź]{}, Phys. Rev. B [**72**]{}, 035320 (2005). Z. Yu, T. Heinzel, and A. T. Johnson, Phys. Rev. B [**55**]{}, 13697 (1997).
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
bibliography:
- 'bibliography.bib'
title: 'Green Correspondence for Virtually Pro-$p$ Groups'
---
\[equation\][Def[i]{}nition]{} \[equation\][Proposition]{} \[equation\][Lemma]{} \[equation\][Theorem]{} \[equation\][Corollary]{} \[equation\][Questions]{}
Introduction
============
Let $p$ be a prime number, $G$ a finite group, $Q$ a $p$-subgroup of $G$ and $L$ any subgroup of $G$ containing the normalizer ${\textnormal{N}_{G}}(Q)$ of $Q$ in $G$. Let $k$ be a field of positive characteristic $p$. In [@greencorrespondencepaper] J.A. Green demonstrates a fundamental correspondence between finitely generated $kG$-modules with vertex $Q$ and finitely generated $kL$-modules with vertex $Q$. When $L={\textnormal{N}_{G}}(Q)$ the Green correspondence allows for the reduction of many questions about general modules to questions about modules with a normal vertex.
Now let $G$ be a profinite group and $k$ a finite field of characteristic $p$. In [@profiniterelprojarxiv] we took some first steps towards a modular representation theory of profinite groups. In particular we demonstrated a classification theorem for relatively projective finitely generated $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{G} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-modules, introduced vertices and sources, and showed that the expected uniqueness properties hold for these objects (under additional hypotheses in the case of sources). Here we generalize the Green correspondence (properly interpreted) to the class of virtually pro-$p$ groups. We will reference [@profiniterelprojarxiv] frequently, since many necessary foundational results are discussed therein.
Our main result is the following:
\[GCprofinite\] Let $G$ be a virtually pro-$p$ group, let $Q$ be a closed pro-$p$ subgroup of $G$ and let $L$ be a closed subgroup of $G$ containing ${\textnormal{N}_{G}}(Q)$. Let $S$ be a finitely generated indecomposable profinite $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{Q} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module with vertex $Q$. Then there is a canonical bijection between the set of isomorphism classes of indecomposable profinite $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{L} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-modules with vertex $Q$ and source $S$, and the set of isomorphism classes of indecomposable profinite $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{G} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-modules with vertex $Q$ and source $S$. More explicitly, if $V$ is an indecomposable $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{L} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module with vertex $Q$ and source $S$, then the correspondent of $V$ under the above bijection is the unique indecomposable summand of $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}$ having vertex $Q$.
We approach the proof in two main steps. We first demonstrate a correspondence which is word-for-word analogous to the finite case under the additional assumption that $L$ is open in $G$. Using this special case we then demonstrate the truth of the above theorem. First let us establish some notation to be assumed throughout our discussion.
The main concepts mentioned in this paragraph are introduced and discussed in [@profiniterelprojarxiv]. Let $G$ be a virtually pro-$p$ group and $k$ a finite field of characteristic $p$. All modules are assumed to be profinite left modules. If $U$ is a $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{G} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module and $N$ is a closed normal subgroup of $G$, then we denote by $U_N$ the coinvariant module $k{\widehat{\otimes}}_{k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{N} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}}U$ - note that this is not a restriction. If $U$ is finitely generated and $N$ is open in $G$, then $U_N$ is finite. If $U$ is non-zero, finitely generated and indecomposable, then by [@profiniterelprojarxiv 2.8, 2.9] we can choose a cofinal inverse system of open normal pro-$p$ subgroups of $G$ for which each $U_N$ is non-zero and indecomposable. As usual, if $H$ is a closed subgroup of $G$ and $V$ is a $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{H} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module, then we denote by $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}$ the $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{G} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module induced from $V$. If $U$ is a $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{G} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module, then we denote by $U{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{H}}}$ the $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{H} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module obtained by restricting the coefficients of $U$.
Let $Q$ be a closed pro-$p$ subgroup of $G$ and let $L$ be any closed subgroup of $G$ containing ${\textnormal{N}_{G}}(Q)$. We define the following two sets of subgroups of $G$: $${\mathfrak{X}}= \{X\leq_C G\,|\, X\leq xQx^{-1}\cap Q, x\notin L\}$$ $${\mathfrak{Y}}= \{Y\leq_C G\,|\, Y\leq xQx^{-1}\cap L, x\notin L\}.$$ If $\mathfrak{H}$ is a collection of subgroups of $G$, then we say a finitely generated $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{G} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module $U$ is relatively $\mathfrak{H}$-projective if each indecomposable summand of $U$ is projective relative to an element of $\mathfrak{H}$. As in the finite case we note that ${\mathfrak{X}}$ consists of proper subgroups of $Q$, while ${\mathfrak{Y}}$ may contain a conjugate of $Q$.
The case where $L$ is open {#open L GC}
==========================
Essentially following the treatment in [@benson 3.12] we prove three lemmas which constitute the bulk of the work for the case of open $L$.
\[summandsofVupanddown\] Let $V$ be a finitely generated indecomposable $Q$-projective $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{L} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module. Then $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}{\cong}V\oplus V_1$, where $V_1$ is ${\mathfrak{Y}}$-projective.
By the Mackey decomposition formula [@symondsdoublecoset 2.2] we have $$V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}{\cong}\bigoplus_{x\in L\backslash G/L}x(V){\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{xLx^{-1}\cap L}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}=V\oplus\bigoplus_{x\in L\backslash G/L, x\notin L}x(V){\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{xLx^{-1}\cap L}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$$ so we need only show that a summand of the form $x(V){\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{xLx^{-1}\cap L}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$ with $x\notin L$ is ${\mathfrak{Y}}$-projective. By [@profiniterelprojarxiv 5.2] the module $x(V)$ is projective relative to $xQx^{-1}$ so by [@profiniterelprojarxiv 3.7] we can choose a $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{xQx^{-1}} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module $S$ such that $x(V){\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}S{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{xLx^{-1}}}}$. Then $$x(V){\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{xLx^{-1}\cap L}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}S{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{xLx^{-1}}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{xLx^{-1}\cap L}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}{\cong}\bigoplus_y y(S){\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{(yx)Q(yx)^{-1}\cap xLx^{-1}\cap L}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$$ where $y$ runs through a set of double coset representatives of $$(xLx^{-1}\cap L)\backslash xLx^{-1}/xQx^{-1}.$$ Note that $yx=xlx^{-1}x=xl$ for some $l\in L$ and $x\notin L$ implies $xl\notin L$ so that each $((yx)Q(yx)^{-1}\cap
xLx^{-1}\cap L)\in {\mathfrak{Y}}$. Hence the module $x(V){\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{xLx^{-1}\cap
L}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$ is relatively ${\mathfrak{Y}}$-projective as required.
\[summandsofVinduced\] Let $V$ be a finitely generated indecomposable $Q$-projective $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{L} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module. Then $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}{\cong}U\oplus U_1$, where $U$ is indecomposable, $V{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}U{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$, and $U_1$ is ${\mathfrak{X}}$-projective.
Since $V{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$, by the Krull–Schmidt theorem [@symondspermcom2 2.1] there is an indecomposable summand $U$ of $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}$ with $V{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}U{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$. Write $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}{\cong}U\oplus U_1$ and take an indecomposable summand $U'$ of $U_1$. We wish to show that $U'$ is relatively ${\mathfrak{X}}$-projective. Note that $U'$ is relatively $Q$-projective.
Since ${\textnormal{N}_{G}}(Q)\leq L$ and $L$ is open, a standard compactness argument allows us to consider a cofinal inverse system of open normal subgroups $N$ of $G$ such that ${\textnormal{N}_{G}}(QN)\leq L$. Fix some $N$ in our system. The module $U'$ is projective relative to $QN$, so $U'{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}U'{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{QN}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}$ by [@profiniterelprojarxiv 3.7]. Since $U'{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{QN}}}$ is finitely generated, we can find some indecomposable $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{QN} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module $S$ such that $S{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}U'{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{QN}}}$ and $U'{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}S{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}$. Now $U'{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{QN}}}{\cong}U'{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{QN}}}$ so there is an indecomposable finitely generated $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{L} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module $V'$ such that $V'{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}U'{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$ and $S{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}V'{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{QN}}}$. Note that $V'$ is a direct summand of $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$ distinct from $V$, so by Lemma \[summandsofVupanddown\] it is projective relative to a subgroup of the form $tQt^{-1}\cap L$ with $t\in G, t\notin L$. Let $T$ be a $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{tQt^{-1}\cap L} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module such that $V'{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}T{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$. From the Mackey decomposition theorem [@symondsdoublecoset 2.2] we have $$S{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}V'{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{QN}}}{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}T{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{QN}}} {\cong}\bigoplus_{l\in QN\backslash L/tQt^{-1}\cap L}l(T){\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{(lt)Q(lt)^{-1}\cap
QN}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{QN}}}.$$ Since $t\notin L$ it follows that $S$ is projective relative to a subgroup of the form $xQx^{-1}\cap QN$ for some $x\notin L$. Since $U'{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}S{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}$ we have shown that for each $N$ in our system the module $U'$ is projective relative to a subgroup of the form $xQx^{-1}\cap QN$ for some $x\notin L$ that depends on $N$.
We would like to find some $x\in G, x\notin L$ for which $U'$ is projective relative to $xQx^{-1}\cap QN$ for every $N$ in our system. Denote by $C_N$ the non-empty set of $x\in G, x\notin L$ for which $U'$ is relatively $[xQx^{-1}\cap QN]$-projective. If ever $N\leq M$ and $x\in C_N$ then certainly $U'$ is projective relative to $xQx^{-1}\cap QM$, so if $x\in C_N$ then $x\in C_M$. Since each $C_N$ is closed in $G$ the standard compactness argument now shows that $\bigcap_N C_N\neq\emptyset$.
Choose some $x\in G, x\notin L$ for which $U'$ is projective relative to $xQx^{-1}\cap QN$ for each $N$ in our system. By [@profiniterelprojarxiv 4.2] it follows that $U'$ is projective relative to $$\bigcap_N(xQx^{-1}\cap QN)=xQx^{-1}\cap(\bigcap_N QN)=xQx^{-1}\cap Q$$ as required.
In the finite case the following lemma is an easy corollary of Lemma \[summandsofVupanddown\]. In our more general context it requires a little more care.
\[appropriate summand of UresL\] Let $U$ be a finitely generated indecomposable $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{G} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module with vertex $Q$. There is a finitely generated indecomposable $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{L} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module $V$ with vertex $Q$ such that $U{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}$ and $V{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}U{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$.
We work in a cofinal inverse system of $N\lhd_O G$ with ${\textnormal{N}_{G}}(QN)\leq L$. We first show that $U{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$ has an indecomposable summand with vertex $Q$. Since $U{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}U{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}$ we have $U{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$ has at least one summand with vertex conjugate to $Q$ in $G$. Let $\mathcal{X}$ denote the non-empty set of isomorphism classes of $V{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}U{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$ having vertex conjugate to $Q$. For each $N$, the fact that $U{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}U{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{QN}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}$ implies that $U{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{QN}}}^L{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}$ for some $V\in \mathcal{X}$, and so $U{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}W{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}$ for some $W{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{QN}}}$. Clearly $W$ has vertex $yQy^{-1}\subseteq QN$.
Suppose $V$ has vertex $xQx^{-1}$ and let $S$ be a $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{xQx^{-1}} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module with $V{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}S{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$. Applying Mackey’s formula to $W{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}S{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{QN}}}$ it follows that $V$ has vertex $L$-conjugate to a subgroup of $QN$, and so $V$ has a vertex contained in $QN$. Note that $\mathcal{X}$ is a finite set, so some element of $\mathcal{X}$ must have vertex contained in $QN$ for a cofinal subset of $N\lhd_O G$ and hence some element of $\mathcal{X}$ has vertex $Q$.
Let $Z$ be an indecomposable summand of $U{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$ and suppose that for all $N$ in our system there is some $x\notin L$ such that $Z$ is $xQNx^{-1}$-projective. Denote by $C_N$ the non-empty set of all such $x\notin L$. If $x\in C_N$ then $xq\in C_N$ for all $q\in QN$ and so each set $C_N$ is closed in $G$.
If $N\leq M$ and $x\in C_N$ then certainly $x\in C_M$. By compactness we now have that $\bigcap_N C_N\neq\emptyset$. Fix $x\in \bigcap_N C_N$. It follows that $Z$ is $xQx^{-1}N$-projective for each $N$, and so $Z$ is $xQx^{-1}$-projective. Note that for any $l\in L$ we have $(lx)Q(lx)^{-1}\neq Q$ since $lx\notin L$. From the conjugacy of vertices [@profiniterelprojarxiv 4.6] it follows that $Z$ does not have vertex $Q$.
Since there is an indecomposable summand of $U{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$ with vertex $Q$ the contrapositive of the previous argument shows there is some $N_0\lhd_O G$ such that this summand is not projective relative to $xQN_0x^{-1}$ for any $x\notin L$. From now on we work within the cofinal system of $N\lhd_O G$ with $N\leq N_0$.
Let $\mathcal{T}$ denote the (finite, non-empty) set of isomorphism classes of indecomposable $V{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}U{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$ such that $U{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}$. We wish to find an element of $\mathcal{T}$ with vertex $Q$. Choose $N$ in our system. Since $U{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}U{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{QN}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}$ we take some indecomposable summand $V{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}U{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{QN}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$ such that $U{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}$. Since $V{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$, by Lemma \[summandsofVupanddown\] we have two possibilities:
- $V{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}U{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$ or
- Each summand of $U{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$ is projective relative to $xQNx^{-1}\cap
L$ for some $x\notin L$.
By our choice of $N$ the latter cannot happen, so that $V{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}U{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$ and so $V\in \mathcal{T}$. Thus for all $N$ there is an element of $\mathcal{T}$ which is $QN$-projective, and so there is an element of $\mathcal{T}$ which has vertex $Q$, as required.
\[GCforLopen\] Let $G$ be a virtually pro-$p$ group, $Q$ a closed pro-$p$ subgroup of $G$ and let $L$ be an open subgroup of $G$ containing $\textnormal{N}_G(Q)$. Then we have the following correspondence between finitely generated indecomposable $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{G} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-modules with vertex $Q$, and finitely generated indecomposable $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{L} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-modules with vertex $Q$:
1. If $U$ is a finitely generated indecomposable $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{G} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module with vertex $Q$, then there is a unique indecomposable summand $f(U)$ of $U{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$ with vertex $Q$, and the rest have vertex in ${\mathfrak{Y}}$.
2. If $V$ is a finitely generated indecomposable $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{L} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module with vertex $Q$, then there is a unique indecomposable summand $g(V)$ of $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}$ with vertex $Q$, and the rest have vertex in ${\mathfrak{X}}$.
3. The given correspondence is one-one in the sense that $f(g(V)){\cong}V$ and $g(f(U)){\cong}U$.
<!-- -->
1. By Lemma \[appropriate summand of UresL\] we have that $U{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}$ for some finitely generated indecomposable $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{L} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module $V$ with vertex $Q$. Thus $U{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$. By Lemma \[summandsofVupanddown\], $V$ is the only summand of $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$ with vertex $Q$ and the rest have vertex in ${\mathfrak{Y}}$, so that $U{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$ has at most one summand with vertex $Q$. On the other hand, again by Lemma \[appropriate summand of UresL\] we have that $U{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$ has at least one summand with vertex $Q$. Hence we set $f(U)=V$ and the claim holds.
2. We have $V{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$ so we choose an indecomposable summand $U{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}$ such that $V{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}U{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$. By Lemma \[summandsofVinduced\], we have $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}{\cong}U\oplus U_1$ where $U_1$ is ${\mathfrak{X}}$-projective. The module $U$ has vertex $Q$ since if it had smaller vertex then the Mackey decomposition theorem shows that $V$ would as well. Thus, we take $g(V)=U$ and we are done.
3. This is clear.
A more general case {#general L GC}
===================
We retain the notation from above but drop the assumption that $L$ is open in $G$. When $L$ was open and $U,V$ were Green correspondents as above, we see in particular that $V{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}U{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}$. This need not be the case when $L$ has infinite index in $G$ - an example of this phenomenon can be found in the last section of [@symondsdoublecoset]. For this reason we now focus on the map $g$.
Let $V$ be an indecomposable finitely generated $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{L} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module with vertex $Q$. By [@profiniterelprojarxiv 5.1] we can choose a cofinal inverse system of $N\lhd_O G$ for which $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}}$ is indecomposable. We work in this system as we prove the following key lemma:
\[induced module has same vertex\] For any given $M\lhd_O G$ in our inverse system the module $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LM}}}$ has vertex $Q$.
Certainly $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LM}}}$ is relatively $Q$-projective, so we choose some vertex $R$ of $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LM}}}$ contained in $Q$. We will show that $V$ is $R$-projective. Consider the cofinal inverse system of those $N\lhd_O G$ contained inside $M$, noting that for each such $N$ the module $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}}$ is indecomposable.
Let $S$ be a $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{R} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module such that $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LM}}}{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}S{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LM}}}$. Then for each $N\leq M$ we have $$V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}}{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LM}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}}{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}S{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LM}}}_R{\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}}{\cong}\bigoplus_{x\in LN\backslash LM/R}x(S){\hspace{-0.6mm}\downarrow_{\hspace{-0.25mm}{xRx^{-1}\cap LN}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}}$$ so that $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}}$ is $xRx^{-1}$-projective for some $x\in LM$ and hence has vertex $xRx^{-1}$. Denote by $C_N$ the non-empty set of all $y\in LM$ with the property that $yRy^{-1}$ is a vertex of $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}}$. Then $C_N$ is a finite union of right cosets of $LN$ so is a closed subset of $LM$. We would like to show that $\bigcap_N
C_N\neq\emptyset$.
Given $N_1,\hdots,N_n$, let $N'=N_1\cap\hdots\cap N_n$. Then by the argument above $C_{N'}\neq \emptyset$. But $C_{N'}\subseteq C_{N_i}$ for each $i$, since if $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN'}}}$ is induced from a $yRy^{-1}$-module, then so is each $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN_i}}}$. Thus, $\emptyset\neq C_{N'}\subseteq C_{N_1}\cap \hdots \cap C_{N_n}$ and so by compactness $\bigcap_N C_N\neq\emptyset$. It follows that we can find some $y\in LM$ so that $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}}$ is $yRy^{-1}$-projective for each $N\leq M$.
We move now from induced modules to coinvariant modules. Note that if $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}}$ is $yRy^{-1}$-projective then it is certainly $yRNy^{-1}$-projective, so for some $yRNy^{-1}$-module $T$ we have $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}}{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}T{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}}$. Now $$V_{L\cap N}{\cong}(V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}})_N{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}(T{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}})_N{\cong}T_N{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}}$$ by [@profiniterelprojarxiv 2.6] so that $V_{L\cap N}$ is $yRNy^{-1}$-projective for each $N$ in our system. Now by [@profiniterelprojarxiv 3.5] the module $V$ is $yRy^{-1}$-projective and so some conjugate of $yRy^{-1}$ contains $Q$. Thus $R\leq Q\leq
zRz^{-1}$ for some $z\in LM$, so $R=Q$ and we are done.
Recall that $L$ contains the normalizer of $Q$ in $G$.
\[GCup\] Let $V$ be an indecomposable finitely generated $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{L} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module with vertex $Q$. Then $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}$ has a unique summand $g(V)$ with vertex $Q$, and the rest have vertex in ${\mathfrak{X}}$.
We choose some $M\lhd_O G$ for which $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LM}}}$ is indecomposable. By Lemma \[induced module has same vertex\], $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LM}}}$ has vertex $Q$. But now by Proposition \[GCforLopen\], $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}{\cong}V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LM}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}$ has a unique summand $g(V)$ with vertex $Q$ and the rest have vertex in $$\{X\leq_C G\,|\, X\leq xQx^{-1}\cap Q, x\notin LM\}$$ but this is a subset of ${\mathfrak{X}}$ and so we are done.
We can now prove Theorem 1.1:
The map $g$ from Corollary \[GCup\] restricted to those modules with source $S$ has the appropriate image and domain. We need only check that $g$ is bijective.
First we show that if $U$ is an indecomposable $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{G} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module with vertex $Q$ and source $S$, then there is some indecomposable $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{L} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-module $V$ with vertex $Q$ and source $S$ such that $U{\cong}g(V)$. But this is clear since if $S{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}{\cong}V_1\oplus\hdots\oplus V_n$ is a decomposition into indecomposable summands then $$U{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}S{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}{\cong}S{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{L}}}{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}{\cong}V_1{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}\oplus\hdots\oplus V_n{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}$$ and so $U{\raisebox{0.5pt}{\,\big|\,}}V_i{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{G}}}$ for some $i$ since $U$ has local endomorphism ring by [@profiniterelprojarxiv 4.4]. Clearly $V_i$ has vertex $Q$. This shows that $g$ is surjective.
It remains to show that if $V,W$ are finitely generated indecomposable $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{L} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-modules having vertex $Q$ and source $S$, and $g(V){\cong}g(W)$ as $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{G} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-modules, then $V{\cong}W$ as $k{{[\hspace{-0.2ex}[}{L} {]\hspace{-0.2ex}]}}$-modules. Choose a cofinal inverse system of $N\lhd_O G$ for which both $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}}$ and $W{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}}$ are indecomposable. Let $g(V){\cong}U{\cong}g(W)$. The modules $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}}$ and $W{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}}$ are both Green correspondents of $U$ in the sense of Proposition \[GCforLopen\] and so $V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}}{\cong}W{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}}$ for each $N$ in our inverse system. But $$\begin{aligned}
V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}} & {\cong}W{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}} \\
\implies (V{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}})_N & {\cong}(W{\hspace{-0.6mm}\uparrow^{\hspace{-0.25mm}{LN}}})_N \\
\implies V_{L\cap N} & {\cong}W_{L\cap N}\end{aligned}$$ for each $N$, and so $V{\cong}W$ by [@profiniterelprojarxiv 3.4].
Acknowledgements
================
The author gratefully acknowledges the help and support of his PhD supervisor Peter Symonds throughout this exciting project. Thanks also to the referee for helpful comments.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: |
Let $G$ be a finite group, and let $R$ be a discrete valuation ring with residue field $k$ and fraction field $K$. We say that $G$ is weakly tame at a prime $p$ if it has no non-trivial normal $p$-subgroups. By convention, every finite group is weakly tame at $0$. Using this definition, we show that if $G$ is weakly tame at ${\operatorname{char}}(k)$, then ${\operatorname{ed}}_K(G) \geqslant {\operatorname{ed}}_k(G)$. Here ${\operatorname{ed}}_F(G)$ denotes the essential dimension of $G$ over the field $F$. We also prove a more general statement of this type, for a class of étale gerbes ${{\mathscr}{X}}$ over $R$.
As a corollary, we show that if $G$ is weakly tame at $p$, then ${\operatorname{ed}}_{L} G \geqslant {\operatorname{ed}}_{k} G$ for any field $L$ of characteristic $0$ and any field $k$ of characteristic $p$, provided that $k$ contains $\overline{{\mathbb{F}}}_{p}$. We also show that a conjecture of A. Ledet, asserting that ${\operatorname{ed}}_k({\mathbb{Z}}/p^n {\mathbb{Z}}) = n$ for a field $k$ of characteristic $p > 0$ implies that ${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{C}}}(G) \geqslant n$ for any finite group $G$ which is weakly tame at $p$ and contains an element of order $p^n$. We give a number of examples, where an unconditional proof of the last inequality is out of the reach of all presently known techniques.
address:
- |
Department of Mathematics\
1301 Mathematics Building\
University of Maryland\
College Park, MD 20742-4015\
USA
- |
Department of Mathematics\
1984 Mathematics Road\
University of British Columbia\
Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2\
Canada
- |
Scuola Normale Superiore\
Piazza dei Cavalieri 7\
56126 Pisa\
Italy
author:
- Patrick Brosnan
- Zinovy Reichstein
- Angelo Vistoli
bibliography:
- 'ed-weakly-tame.bib'
title: |
Essential dimension\
in mixed characteristic
---
[^1]
[^2]
[^3] [^4]
Introduction
============
Let $R$ be a discrete valuation ring with residue field $k$ and fraction field $K$, and let $G$ be a finite group. In this paper we will compare ${\operatorname{ed}}_K(G)$ and ${\operatorname{ed}}_k(G)$. More generally, we will compare ${\operatorname{ed}}_K({{\mathscr}{X}})$ to ${\operatorname{ed}}_k({{\mathscr}{X}})$ for an étale gerbe ${{\mathscr}{X}}$ over $R$. For an overview of the theory of essential dimension, we refer the reader to [@brosnan-reichstein-vistoli3; @merkurjev-survey; @reichstein-icm].
To state our main result, we will need some definitions.
Suppose $S$ is a scheme. By an *étale gerbe* ${{\mathscr}{X}}{\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}S$ we mean an algebraic stack that is a gerbe in the étale topology on $S$. Furthermore, we will always assume that there exists an étale covering $\{S_{i} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}S\}$, such that the pullback ${{\mathscr}{X}}_{S_{i}}$ is of the form ${{\mathscr}{B}}_{S_{i}}G_{i}$, where $G_{i} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}S_{i}$ is a finite étale group scheme.
We say that a finite group $G$ is *tame* (resp. *weakly tame*) at a prime number $p$ if $p\nmid |G|$ (resp. $G$ contains no non-trivial normal $p$-subgroup). Equivalently, $G$ is tame at $p$ if the trivial group is the (unique) $p$-Sylow subgroup of $G$, and $G$ is weakly tame at $p$ if the intersection of all $p$-Sylow subgroups of $G$ is trivial. By convention we say that every finite group is both tame and weakly tame at $0$. [^5]
By a geometric point of $S$, we mean a morphism ${\operatorname{Spec}}\Omega {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}S$ with $\Omega$ an algebraically closed field. We say that a finite étale group scheme $G$ over $S$ is *tame* (resp. *weakly tame*) if, for every geometric point ${\operatorname{Spec}}\Omega\to S$, the group $G(\Omega)$ is tame (resp. weakly tame) at ${\operatorname{char}}\Omega$. Similarly, we say that an étale gerbe ${{\mathscr}{X}}{\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}S$ is *tame* (resp. *weakly tame*) if, for every object $\xi$ over a geometric point ${\operatorname{Spec}}\Omega {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}S$, the automorphism group ${\operatorname{Aut}}_{\Omega}\xi$ is tame (resp. weakly tame) at ${\operatorname{char}}\Omega$.
A key result of [@brosnan-reichstein-vistoli3] is the so called *Genericity Theorem* for tame Deligne–Mumford stacks, [@brosnan-reichstein-vistoli3 Theorem 6.1]. The proof of this result in [@brosnan-reichstein-vistoli3] was based on the following.
\[thmbrv3\] Let $R$ be a discrete valuation ring (DVR) with residue field $k$ and fraction field $K$, and let $${{\mathscr}{X}}{\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{\operatorname{Spec}}R$$ be a tame étale gerbe. Then ${\operatorname{ed}}_{K}{{\mathscr}{X}}_K \geqslant {\operatorname{ed}}_{k}{{\mathscr}{X}}_{k}$.
Here ${{\mathscr}{X}}_{K}$ and ${{\mathscr}{X}}_{k}$ are respectively the generic fiber and the special fiber of ${{\mathscr}{X}}{\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{\operatorname{Spec}}R$.
Unfortunately, the proof of [@brosnan-reichstein-vistoli3 Theorem 5.11] contains an error in the case when ${\operatorname{char}}K = 0$ and ${\operatorname{char}}k > 0$. This was noticed by Amit Hogadi, to whom we are very grateful. (See Remark \[remex\] for an explanation of the error.) For the applications in [@brosnan-reichstein-vistoli3] only the equicharacteristic case was needed, so this mistake in the proof of Theorem \[thmbrv3\] does not affect any other results in [@brosnan-reichstein-vistoli3] (the genericity theorem, in particular). However, the assertion of Theorem \[thmbrv3\] in the mixed characteristic case remained of interest to us, as a way of relating essential dimension in positive characteristic to essential dimension in characteristic $0$. In this paper, our main result is the following strengthened version of Theorem \[thmbrv3\].
\[thm.main\] Let $R$ be a DVR with residue field $k$ and fraction field $K$, and let $${{\mathscr}{X}}{\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{\operatorname{Spec}}R$$ be a weakly tame étale gerbe. Then ${\operatorname{ed}}_{K}{{\mathscr}{X}}_K \geqslant {\operatorname{ed}}_{k}{{\mathscr}{X}}_{k}$.
In particular, [@brosnan-reichstein-vistoli3 Theorem 5.11] is valid as stated. Moreover, our new proof is considerably shorter than the one in [@brosnan-reichstein-vistoli3]. And in Sections \[sect.cors\]-\[sect.psl2\] we will deduce some rather surprising consequences.
We will give two proofs of our main result, one for gerbes of the form where ${{\mathscr}{X}}= {{\mathscr}{B}}_{R}G$, where $G$ is a (constant) finite group (Theorem \[thm.main0\]) and the other for the general case. The ideas in these two proofs are closely related; the proof of Theorem \[thm.main0\] allows us to introduce these ideas in the elementary setting of classical valuation theory. A separate proof of Theorem \[thm.main0\] also makes the applications in Sections \[sect.cors\]-\[sect.psl2\] accessible to those readers who are not familiar with, or don’t care for, the language of gerbes.
Acknowledgements {#acknowledgements .unnumbered}
----------------
We are grateful to the referee for a thorough reading and constructive suggestions. We would also like to thank Alexander Duncan and Najmuddin Fakhruddin for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.
Proof of Theorem \[thm.main\] in the constant case {#sect.const}
==================================================
In this section we will prove a special case of Theorem \[thm.main\], where ${{\mathscr}{X}}= {{\mathscr}{B}}_{R}G$ for $G$ a finite group (viewed as a constant group scheme over ${\operatorname{Spec}}R$); see Theorem \[thm.main0\].
Throughout this section we will assume that $L$ is a field equipped with a (surjective) discrete valuation $\nu \colon L^* \to {\mathbb{Z}}$ and $K$ is a subfield of $L$ such that $\nu(K^*) = {\mathbb{Z}}$. We will denote the residue fields of $L$ and $K$ by $l$ and $k$, respectively. Similarly, we will denote the valuation rings by ${\mathscr}{O}_L$ and ${\mathscr}{O}_K$.
The following lemma is a special case of the Corollary to Theorem 1.20 in [@vaquie]. For the convenience of the reader, we supply a short proof.
\[lem.valuation\] ${\operatorname{trdeg}}_k(l) \leqslant {\operatorname{trdeg}}_K(L)$.
Let $u_{1}, \ldots, u_{m} \in l$ be algebraically independent over $k$. Lift each $u_i$ to $v_i \in {{\mathscr}{O}}_{L} \subseteq L$. It now suffices to show that $v_1, \dots, v_m$ are algebraically independent over $K$. Assume the contrary: $f(v_{1}, \dots , v_{m}) = 0$ for some polynomial $0 \neq f(x_1, \dots, x_m) \in K[x_{1}, \dots, x_{m}]$. After clearing denominators we may assume that every coefficient of $f$ lies in ${{\mathscr}{O}}_{K}$, and at least one of the coefficients has valuation $0$. If $f_{0}$ is the image of $f$ in $k[x_{1}, \dots, x_{m}]$ then $f_{0} \neq 0$ and $f_{0}(u_{1}, \dots, u_{m}) = 0$. This contradicts our assumption that $u_1, \dots, u_m$ are algebraically independent over $k$.
Let $L_m = \nu^{-1}(m) \cup \{ 0 \}$ and $L_{\geqslant m} = \bigcup_{j \geqslant m} \, L_j$. Note that, by definition, $L_{\geqslant 0} = {{\mathscr}{O}}_L$ is the valuation ring of $\nu$, $L_{\geqslant 1}$ is the maximal ideal, and $L_{\geqslant 0}/L_{\geqslant 1} = l$ is the residue field.
\[lem.bur5.1\] Assume that $g$ is an automorphism of $L$ of finite order $d \geqslant 1$, preserving the valuation $\nu$. Let $p = {\operatorname{char}}(l) \geqslant 0$. If $g$ induces a trivial automorphism on both $L_{\geqslant 0}/L_{\geqslant 1}$ and $L_{\geqslant 1}/L_{\geqslant 2}$, then
\(a) $d = 1$ (i.e., $g = {\mathrm{id}}$ is the identity automorphism) if $p = 0$, and
\(b) $d$ is a power of $p$, if $p > 0$.
Part (a) is proved in [@bur Lemma 5.1]; a minor variant of the same argument also proves (b). Alternatively, with some additional work, Lemma \[lem.bur5.1\] can be deduced from [@zs1 Theorem 25, p. 295]. For the reader’s convenience we will give a short self-contained proof below.
In case (b), write $d = mp^{r}$, where $m$ is not divisible by $p$. After replacing $g$ by $g^{p^{r}}$, we may assume that $d$ is prime to $p$. In both parts we need to conclude that $g$ is the identity.
Let $G$ be the cyclic group generated by $g$; then $G$ is linearly reductive. Since the action of $G$ on $l$ is trivial, the induced action on $L_{{\geqslant}i}/L_{{\geqslant}i+1}$ is $l$-linear. Furthermore, let $t \in L_1$ be a uniformizing parameter. By our assumption $g(t) = t \pmod{L_{\geqslant 2}}$. Thus multiplication by $t^{i-1}$ induces the $l$-linear $G$-equivariant isomorphism $(L_{\geqslant 1}/L_{\geqslant 2})^{\otimes i}
\simeq L_{{\geqslant}i}/L_{{\geqslant}i+1}$. Consequently, $G$ acts trivially on $L_{{\geqslant}i}/L_{{\geqslant}i+1}$ for all $i {\geqslant}0$. Since $G$ is linearly reductive, from the exact sequence $$0 {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}L_{{\geqslant}i}/L_{{\geqslant}i+1} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}L_{{\geqslant}0}/L_{{\geqslant}i+1} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}L_{{\geqslant}0}/L_{{\geqslant}i} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}0$$ we deduce, by induction on $i$, that $G$ acts trivially on $L_{{\geqslant}0}/L_{{\geqslant}i}$ for every $i \geqslant 1$. Since $\bigcap_{i {\geqslant}0} L_{i} = 0$, this implies that the action of $G$ on $L_{{\geqslant}0}$ is trivial. But $L_{{\geqslant}0}$ is a domain with quotient field $L$, so $G$ also acts trivially on $L$. Since $G$ acts faithfully on $L$, we conclude that $G = \{1\}$, and the lemma follows.
\[prop.faithful\] Consider a faithful action of a finite group $G$ on $L$, such that $G$ preserves $\nu$ and acts trivially on $K$. Let $\Delta$ be the kernel of the induced $G$-action on $l$. Then $\Delta = \{ 1 \}$ if ${\operatorname{char}}(k) = 0$ and $\Delta$ is a $p$-subgroup if ${\operatorname{char}}(k) = p$.
Assume the contrary. Then we can choose an element $g \in \Delta$ of prime order $q$, such that $q \neq {\operatorname{char}}(k)$. Let $M$ be the maximal ideal of the valuation ring ${{\mathscr}{O}}_L$. Since we are assuming that $\nu(K^*) = \nu(L^*) = {\mathbb{Z}}$, we can choose a uniformizing parameter $t \in K$ for $\nu$. Since $g \in \Delta$, $g$ acts trivially on both $l = {{\mathscr}{O}}_L/M$ and $M/M^2 = l \cdot t$. By Lemma \[lem.bur5.1\], $g$ acts trivially on $L$. This contradicts our assumption that $G$ acts faithfully on $L$.
We are now ready to prove the main result of this section.
\[thm.main0\] Let $(R, \nu)$ be a discrete valuation ring with residue field $k$ and fraction field $K$, and $G$ be a finite group. If $p = {\operatorname{char}}(k) > 0$, assume that $G$ is weakly tame at $p$. Then ${\operatorname{ed}}_{K}(G) \geqslant {\operatorname{ed}}_{k}(G)$.
Set $d {\mathrel{\smash{\overset{\mathrm{\scriptscriptstyle def}} =}}}{\operatorname{ed}}_K(G)$. Let $R[G]$ be the group algebra of $G$ and let $V_R = (\mathbb{A}_R)^{|G|}$ denote the corresponding $R$-scheme equipped with the (left) regular action of $G$. By definition $d$ is the minimal transcendence degree ${\operatorname{trdeg}}_K(L)$, where $L$ ranges over $G$-invariant intermediate subfields $K \subset L \subset K(V_K)$ such that the $G$-action on $L$ is faithful; see [@bur]. Choose a $G$-invariant intermediate subfield $L$ such that ${\operatorname{trdeg}}_K(L) = d$.
We will now construct a $G$-invariant intermediate subfield $k \subset l \subset k(V_k)$, where $V_k$ is the regular representation of $G$ over $k$, as follows. Lift the given valuation $\nu \colon K^* \to {\mathbb{Z}}$ to the purely transcendental extension $K(V_K)$ of $K$ in the obvious way. That is, $\nu: K(V_K)^* \to \mathbb{Z}$ is the divisorial valuation corresponding to the fiber of $V_R$ over the closed point in ${\operatorname{Spec}}R$. The residue field of $K(V_K)$ is then $k(V_k)$. By restriction, $\nu$ is a valuation on $L$ with $\nu(L^*)=\mathbb{Z}$. Let $l$ be the residue field of $L$. Clearly $k \subset l \subset k(V_k)$ and $\nu$ is invariant under $G$. By Proposition \[prop.faithful\], $G$ acts faithfully on $l$. Moreover, by Lemma \[lem.valuation\], ${\operatorname{trdeg}}_k(l) \leqslant d$. Thus ${\operatorname{ed}}_k(G) \leqslant d = {\operatorname{ed}}_K(G)$, as desired.
Examples illustrating Theorem \[thm.main0\] and a simple application {#sect.cors}
====================================================================
\[ex.necessary1\] The following example shows that Theorem \[thm.main0\] fails if we do not assume that $G$ is weakly tame. Choose $R$ so that ${\operatorname{char}}K = 0$, ${\operatorname{char}}k = p > 0$, and $K$ contains a $p^{2}$-th root of $1$. Let $G = C_{p^2}$ be the cyclic group of order $p^{2}$. Since $K$ contains a primitive $p^2$-th root of $1$, ${\operatorname{ed}}_K (G) = {\operatorname{ed}}_{K} ({\mathrm{C}}_{p^{2}}) = 1$. On the other hand, ${\operatorname{ed}}_k(G) = {\operatorname{ed}}_{k} ({\mathrm{C}}_{p^{2}}) = 2$; this is a special (known) case of Ledet’s conjecture, see Remark \[rem.ledet\].
\[ex.necessary2\] Here is an example showing that Theorem \[thm.main0\] fails if we do not assume that $R$ is a DVR. Let $R \subseteq {\mathbb{C}}{[\mspace{-2mu}[t]\mspace{-2mu}]}$ be the subring consisting of power series in $t$ whose constant term is real. Then $R$ is a one-dimensional complete Noetherian local ring with quotient field $K = {\mathbb{C}}{(\mspace{-3mu}(t)\mspace{-3mu})}$ and residue field $k = {\mathbb{R}}$, but not a DVR. Letting $G = C_4$ be the cyclic group of order $4$, we see that in this situation ${\operatorname{ed}}_K(G) = {\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{C}}{(\mspace{-3mu}(t)\mspace{-3mu})}} ({\mathrm{C}}_{4}) = 1$, while ${\operatorname{ed}}_k(G) = {\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{R}}} ({\mathrm{C}}_{4}) = 2$; see [@bf1 Theorem 7.6].
\[ex.semicontinuity\] (cf. [@tossici Remark 4.5(ii)]) This example shows that essential dimension is not semicontinuous in any reasonable sense, even in characteristic $0$. Consider the scheme $$S {\mathrel{\smash{\overset{\mathrm{\scriptscriptstyle def}} =}}}{\operatorname{Spec}}{\mathbb{Q}}[u, x]/(x^{2} - u)\,.$$ The embedding ${\mathbb{Q}}[u] \subseteq {\mathbb{Q}}[u, x]/(x^{2} - u)$ gives a finite map $S {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{\mathbb{A}}^{1}_{{\mathbb{Q}}}$. If $p$ is an odd prime, the inverse image of the prime $(u - p) \subseteq {\mathbb{Q}}[u]$ in $S$ consists of a point $s_{p}$ with residue field $k(s_{p}) =\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{p}) = {\mathbb{Q}}[x]/(x^{2} - p)$. Then ${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{Q}}(\sqrt{p})}({\mathrm{C}}_{4}) = 1$ if $-1$ is a square modulo $p$, and ${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{Q}}(\sqrt{p})}{\mathrm{C}}_{4} = 2$ if $-1$ is not a square modulo $p$; once again, see [@bf1 Theorem 7.6]. Equivalently, ${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{Q}}(\sqrt{p})}({\mathrm{C}}_{4}) = 1$ if $p \equiv 1 \pmod{4}$, and ${\operatorname{ed}}_{\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{p})}{\mathrm{C}}_{4} = 2$ is $p \equiv 3 \pmod{4}$. We conclude that the set of points $s \in S$ with ${\operatorname{ed}}_{k(s)}{\mathrm{C}}_{4} = 1$ is dense in $S$, and likewise for the set of points $s \in S$ with ${\operatorname{ed}}_{k(s)}{\mathrm{C}}_{4} = 2$ is also dense in $S$.
We conclude this section with an easy corollary of Theorem \[thm.main0\].
\[cor1\] Let $p$ be a prime, $G$ a finite group weakly tame at $p$. Then
[(]{}cf. [@tossici Corollary 4.2][)]{} ${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{Q}}}G \geqslant{\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{F}}_{p}}G$.
If $K$ is a field of characteristic $0$ and $k$ a field of characteristic $p$ containing $\overline{{\mathbb{F}}}_{p}$, then ${\operatorname{ed}}_{K}G \geqslant {\operatorname{ed}}_{k}G$.
\(a) follows directly from Theorem \[thm.main0\] by taking $R$ to be the localization of the ring of integers ${\mathbb{Z}}$ at a prime ideal $p {\mathbb{Z}}$.
\(b) Let $\overline{K}$ be the algebraic closure of $K$. Since ${\operatorname{ed}}_K(G) {\geqslant}{\operatorname{ed}}_{\overline{K}}(G)$, we may replace that $K$ by $\overline{K}$ and thus assume that $K$ is algebraically closed. Note that ${\operatorname{ed}}_{K}G = {\operatorname{ed}}_{\overline{{\mathbb{Q}}}}G$ and ${\operatorname{ed}}_{k}G = {\operatorname{ed}}_{\overline{{\mathbb{F}}}_{p}}G$; see [@brv1a Proposition 2.14] or [@tossici Example 4.10].
Choose a number field $E \subseteq \overline{{\mathbb{Q}}}$ such that ${\operatorname{ed}}_{E}G = {\operatorname{ed}}_{\overline{{\mathbb{Q}}}}G$ and let ${\mathfrak{p}}\subseteq {{\mathscr}{O}}_{E}$ a prime in the ring ${{\mathscr}{O}}_{E}$ of algebraic integers in $E$ lying over $p$. Set $E_{0} {\mathrel{\smash{\overset{\mathrm{\scriptscriptstyle def}} =}}}{{\mathscr}{O}}_{E}/{\mathfrak{p}}$. Since $k$ contains $\overline{{\mathbb{F}}}_{p}$, there is an embedding $E_{0} \subseteq k$. By Theorem \[thm.main0\], ${\operatorname{ed}}_{E}(G) \geqslant {\operatorname{ed}}_{E_{0}}(G)$ and since $E_0 \subset k$, ${\operatorname{ed}}_{E_{0}}G \geqslant {\operatorname{ed}}_{k}G$.
\[ex.equality\] A. Duncan pointed out to us that equality in Corollary \[cor1\](b) does not always hold. For example, let $G = A_5$ be the alternating group of order $60$ and $p = 2$. Note that since $A_5$ is simple, it is weakly tame at every prime. By [@bur Theorem 6.7], ${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{C}}}(A_5) = 2$. On the other hand, $A_5 \simeq {\mathrm{SL}}_2(\mathbb{F}_4)$ admits a $2$-dimensional faithful linear representation over any field $k$ containing $\mathbb{F}_4$, that is, the representation coming from the obvious inclusion of ${\mathrm{SL}}_2({\mathbb{F}}_4)$ into ${\mathrm{SL}}_2(k)$. The natural ($A_5$-equivariant) projection ${\mathbb{A}}^2 \dasharrow {\mathbb{P}}^1$ now tells us that ${\operatorname{ed}}_k(A_5) = 1$. In summary, $$2 = {\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{C}}}(A_5) > {\operatorname{ed}}_k(A_5) = 1 .$$
\[rem.inequality\] The group $G = A_5$ in Example \[ex.equality\] is weakly tame but not tame at $2$. We do not know of any such examples with $G$ tame. We conjecture that they do not exist. That is, if $|G|$ is prime to $p$, then under the hypotheses of Corollary \[cor1\](b), ${\operatorname{ed}}_{K}G = {\operatorname{ed}}_{k}G$, provided that $K$ is algebraically closed.
Ledet’s conjecture and its consequences
=======================================
The following conjecture is due to A. Ledet [@ledet-p].
\[conj.ledet\] If $k$ is a field of characteristic $p > 0$, $n$ is a natural number, and ${\mathrm{C}}_{p^{n}}$ is a cyclic group of order $p^{n}$, then ${\operatorname{ed}}_{k}({\mathrm{C}}_{p^{n}}) = n$.
\[rem.ledet\] It is known that in characteristic $p$, ${\operatorname{ed}}({\mathrm{C}}_{p^n}) \leqslant n$ for every $n {\geqslant}1$ (see [@ledet-p]) and ${\operatorname{ed}}({\mathrm{C}}_{p^n}) \geqslant 2$ if $n \geqslant 2$ ([@ledet-ed1 Theorems 5 and 7]). Thus the conjecture holds for $n = 1$ and $n = 2$; it remains open for every $n \geqslant 3$.
Combining Conjecture \[conj.ledet\] with Theorem \[thm.main0\], we obtain the following surprising result.
\[prop2\] Assume that a finite group $G$ is weakly tame at a prime $p$ and contains an element of order $p^n$. Let $K$ be a field of characteristic $0$. If Conjecture \[conj.ledet\] holds for $C_{p^n}$, then ${\operatorname{ed}}_{K}(G) \geqslant n$.
By Corollary \[cor1\](b), with $k = \overline{{\mathbb{F}}}_p$, we have ${\operatorname{ed}}_K(G) \geqslant {\operatorname{ed}}_k(G)$. Since $G$ contains ${\mathrm{C}}_{p^n}$, ${\operatorname{ed}}_k(G) \geqslant {\operatorname{ed}}_k({\mathrm{C}}_{p^n})$, and by Conjecture \[conj.ledet\], ${\operatorname{ed}}_k({\mathrm{C}}_{p^n}) = n$.
\[cor.semidirect\] Let $p$ be a prime and $n$ a positive integer. Choose a positive integer $m$ such that $q {\mathrel{\smash{\overset{\mathrm{\scriptscriptstyle def}} =}}}mp^{n}+1$ is a prime. (By Dirichlet’s theorem on primes in arithmetic progressions, there are infinitely many such $m$.) Let ${\mathrm{C}}_{q}$ be a cyclic group of order $q$. Then ${\operatorname{Aut}}{\mathrm{C}}_{q} = ({\mathbb{Z}}/q{\mathbb{Z}})^{*}$ is cyclic of order $mp^{n}$; let ${\mathrm{C}}_{p^{n}} \subseteq ({\mathbb{Z}}/q{\mathbb{Z}})^{*}$ denote the subgroup of order $p^{n}$. Set $G {\mathrel{\smash{\overset{\mathrm{\scriptscriptstyle def}} =}}}{\mathrm{C}}_{p^{n}} \ltimes {\mathrm{C}}_{q}$. Then
\(a) $G$ is weakly tame at $p$, and
\(b) if Conjecture \[conj.ledet\] holds, then ${\operatorname{ed}}_K(G) \geqslant n$ for any field $K$ of characteristic $0$.
\(a) Suppose $S \subseteq G$ is a normal $p$-subgroup. Then $S$ lies in every Sylow $p$-subgroup of $G$, in particular, in $C_{p^n}$. Our goal is to show that $S = \{ 1 \}$. The cyclic group $C_q$ of prime order $q$ acts on $S$ by conjugation. Since $q > p^n \geqslant |S|$, this action is trivial. In other words, $S$ is a central subgroup of $G$. In particular, $S$ acts trivially on $C_q$ by conjugation. On the other hand, by the definition of $G$, $C_{p^n}$ acts faithfully on $C_{q}$ by conjugation. We conclude that $S = \{1\}$, as desired.
\(b) follows from Proposition \[prop2\].
\[rem.semidirect1\] The inequality of Corollary \[cor.semidirect\](b) is equivalent to $$\label{e.semidirect}
{\operatorname{ed}}_{\mathbb{C}}({\mathrm{C}}_{p^n} \ltimes {\mathrm{C}}_{q}) \geqslant n \, ,$$ where ${\mathbb{C}}$ is the field of complex numbers (once again, see [@brv1a Proposition 2.14] or [@tossici Example 4.10]). For $n = 2$ and $3$, this inequality can be proved unconditionally (i.e., without assuming Conjecture \[conj.ledet\]) by appealing to the classifications of finite groups of essential dimension $1$ and $2$ over ${\mathbb{C}}$ in [@bur Theorem 6.2] and [@duncan-ed2 Theorem 1.1] respectively.
\[rem.semidirect2\] Let $G$ be a finite group. Set $${\operatorname{ed}^{\rm loc}}_k(G) := \max \, \{ {\operatorname{ed}}(G; p) \, | \, \text{$p$ is a prime} \},$$ where ${\operatorname{ed}}_k(G; p)$ denotes essential dimension of $G$ at a prime $p$ and the superscript “loc" stands for “local". If the base field $k$ is assumed to be fixed, we will write ${\operatorname{ed}}(G; p)$ and ${\operatorname{ed}^{\rm loc}}(G)$ in place of ${\operatorname{ed}}_k(G; p)$ and ${\operatorname{ed}^{\rm loc}}_k$, respectively.
Clearly ${\operatorname{ed}}(G) \geqslant {\operatorname{ed}^{\rm loc}}(G)$. In the language of [@reichstein-icm Section 5], computing ${\operatorname{ed}^{\rm loc}}(G)$ is a Type I problem. This problem is solved, at least in principle, by the Karpenko-Merkurjev theorem [@km2]. Computing ${\operatorname{ed}}(G)$ in those case, where ${\operatorname{ed}}(G) > {\operatorname{ed}^{\rm loc}}(G)$ is a Type II problem. Such problems tend to be very hard. For more on this, see [@reichstein-icm Section 5] or the discussion after the statement of Theorem 2 in [@reichstein-cremona].
Let us now return to the setting of Corollary \[cor.semidirect\], where $G = {\mathrm{C}}_{p^n} \ltimes {\mathrm{C}}_{q}$. Since all Sylow subgroups of $G = {\mathrm{C}}_{p^n} \ltimes {\mathrm{C}}_{q}$ are cyclic, one readily sees that ${\operatorname{ed}^{\rm loc}}_{{\mathbb{C}}}(G) = 1$. Thus the inequality is a “Type 2 problem" whenever $n \geqslant 2$. An unconditional proof of this inequality is out of the reach of all currently available techniques for any $n\geqslant 3$. However, it is shown in [@reichstein-cremona] that $$\lim_{n \to \infty} {\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{C}}} ({\mathrm{C}}_{p^{n}} \ltimes {\mathrm{C}}_{q}) \longrightarrow \infty$$ for any choice of $q$.
\[rem.ed-p\] It is shown in [@rei-vi] that if $G$ is a finite group and $k$ is a field of characteristic $p$, then $$\label{e.ed-p}
{\operatorname{ed}}_k(G; p) = \begin{cases} \text{$1$, if $p$ divides $|G|$, and} \\
\text{$0$, otherwise.}
\end{cases}$$ In particular, ${\operatorname{ed}^{\rm loc}}_k(C_{p^n}) = 1$ for every $n \geqslant 1$. So, for $n \geqslant 2$, Conjecture \[conj.ledet\] is also a Type 2 problem. Thus the situation in Corollary \[cor.semidirect\] can be described as follows: we deduce one Type II assertion from another, without being able to prove either one from first principles. Another results of this type is [@duncan-reichstein Proposition 10.8]; further examples can be found in the next section.
\[rem.main0-at-p\] In view of , Corollary \[cor1\](b) continues to hold if we replace essential dimension by essential dimension at $p$, for trivial reasons. Moreover, under the assumptions of Corollary \[cor1\], (a$^{\prime}$) ${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{Q}}}(G; p) \geqslant{\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{F}}_{p}}(G; p)$ and (b$^{\prime}$) ${\operatorname{ed}}_{K}(G; p) \geqslant {\operatorname{ed}}_{k}(G; p)$, for any finite group $G$, not necessarily weakly tame. In (b$^{\prime}$) we can also drop the requirement that $k$ should contain $\overline{{\mathbb{F}}}_p$. Note however that our proof of Theorem \[thm.main0\] breaks down if we replace essential dimension by essential dimension at $p$.
Essential dimension of ${\mathrm{PSL}}_2(q)$ {#sect.psl2}
============================================
Let $p$ be a prime, $q = p^r$ be a prime power and $\mathbb F_q$ be a field of $q$ elements. Let $G = {\mathrm{PSL}}_2(q) = {\mathrm{PSL}}(2, {\mathbb{F}}_q)$. (To avoid confusion, we remind the reader that $G$ is the quotient of ${\mathrm{SL}}(2,{\mathbb{F}}_q)$ by its subgroup $\{\pm 1\}$. In general, it is not the same thing as the group ${\mathrm{PSL}}_2({\mathbb{F}}_q)$ of ${\mathbb{F}}_q$ points of the algebraic group ${\mathrm{PSL}}_2 = {\mathrm{PGL}}_{2}$.) For $q>3$, it is well-known that $G$ is simple; see, e.g., [@Dieudonne p. 39] or [@gfg p. 419]. Hence, $G$ is weakly tame at every prime. In this section we will work over the field $k = {\mathbb{C}}$ of complex numbers and deduce lower bounds on ${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{C}}}(G)$ from Ledet’s conjecture.
For some $q$, these lower bounds are Type II bounds, in the sense of Remark \[rem.semidirect2\], and are genuinely new. To establish this we will compute ${\operatorname{ed}^{\rm loc}}(G)$ in every case. We begin with the following well-known description of the Sylow subgroups of ${\mathrm{PSL}}_2(q)$.
\[dih\] Let $p$ and $\ell$ be prime numbers and set $q=p^r$ for some positive integer $r$. Let $G_{\ell}$ denote an $\ell$-Sylow subgroup of $G={\mathrm{PSL}}_2(q)$. Then
1. For $\ell=p$, we have $G_{\ell}\cong (C_p)^r$.
2. For $\ell\not\in\{2,p\}$, $G_{\ell}$ is cyclic.
3. For $p$ odd and $\ell=2$, $G_{\ell}$ is dihedral.
See [@gfg Lemma 1.1 on page 418].
\[prop.psl2\] Let $p$ be a prime and $q = p^r$ be a prime power.
\(a) ${\operatorname{ed}^{\rm loc}}{\mathrm{PSL}}_2(q)= \begin{cases} r, & \text{$q$ even};\\
\max(2,r), & \text{$q$ odd}.
\end{cases} $
\(b) Let $\ell$ be a prime and $s$ be a nonnegative integer such that $2 \ell^s$ divides $q^2 - 1$. If Ledet’s Conjecture [\[conj.ledet\]]{} holds for cyclic groups of order $\ell^s$ in characteristic $\ell$, then ${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{C}}} ( {\mathrm{PSL}}_2(q) ) \geqslant s$.
Note that part (b) is conditional on Ledet’s conjecture but part (a) is not.
Set $G={\mathrm{PSL}}_2(q)$. We begin by pointing out that $$\label{Gsize}
|G|=\begin{cases}
(q-1)q(q+1)/2, & 2\nmid q;\\
(q-1)q(q+1), & 2| q.
\end{cases}$$
\(a) Recall that ${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{C}}}(G;\ell) = {\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{C}}}(G_{\ell}; \ell)$, where $G_{\ell}$ is a Sylow $\ell$-subgroup of $G$. So we only need to consider the primes $\ell$ dividing $|G|$; otherwise $G_{\ell} = \{ 1 \}$ and ${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{C}}}(G_{\ell}; \ell) = 0$.
If $\ell \neq 2$ or $p$, then by Lemma \[dih\] (b), $G_{\ell}$ is cyclic; hence, ${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{C}}}(G_{\ell}) = 1$.
If $\ell = p$, then by Lemma \[dih\] (a), $G_{\ell} = G_p = (C_p)^r$, and ${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{C}}}(G_p; p)=r$.
If $\ell = 2$ and $p$ is odd, then by Lemma \[dih\] (c), $G_{\ell}$ is a dihedral group; hence, $G_{\ell}$ has a 2-dimensional faithful linear representation over $\mathbb C$. We conclude that ${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{C}}}(G_{2}; 2) \leqslant 2$. On the other hand, since $G_2$ is not cyclic and $|G_2|\equiv 0\pmod{4}$, ${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{C}}} G_{\ell}{\geqslant}2$ by [@bur Theorem 6.2]. So ${\operatorname{ed}}_{\mathbb{C}} G_{\ell}=2$.
This proves part (a) for the case that $p$ is odd. The case that $p$ is even follows directly from Lemma \[dih\] by the same method.
\(b) Note that the assertion of part (b) is vacuous if $\ell=p$ or $p = 2$. So we may assume that $p$ is odd and $\ell\neq p$. Then it follows from Lemma \[dih\] that the Sylow $\ell$-subgroup of ${\mathrm{PSL}}_2(q)$ is cyclic if $\ell$ is odd and dihedral if $\ell = 2$. Thus, by , ${\mathrm{PSL}}_2(q)$ contains an element of order ${\ell}^s$, and the desired inequality follows from Proposition \[prop2\].
\[rem1.psl2\] Note that, for odd $\ell$, Proposition \[prop.psl2\](a) gives the “Type I" lower bound: ${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{C}}}{\mathrm{PSL}}_2(q) \geqslant \max \{ 2, r \}$; cf. Remark \[rem.semidirect2\]. We also know which finite simple groups have essential dimension $1$, $2$ or $3$ from [@bur Theorem 6.2], [@duncan-ed2] and [@beauville], respectively. Thus the lower bound of Proposition \[prop.psl2\](b) is only of interest in those cases, where $$s \geqslant \max \{r + 1, 5 \}.$$ In such cases an unconditional proof of the lower bound $${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{C}}}({\mathrm{PGL}}_2(q)) \geqslant s$$ (i.e., a proof that does not rely on Ledet’s conjecture) is not known.
\[rem2.psl2\] It follows from Proposition \[prop.psl2\](a) that ${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{C}}}({\mathrm{PSL}}_2(q)) \geqslant {\operatorname{ed}^{\rm loc}}_{{\mathbb{C}}}({\mathrm{PSL}}_2(q) \geqslant r$ for any $q = p^r$. Hence, if we want to deduce an interesting (Type II) lower bound on ${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{C}}}({\mathrm{PSL}}_2(q))$ from Proposition \[prop2\], we need $\ell^s$ to divide $q \pm 1 = p^r \pm 1$ for some prime $\ell$ and some integer $s \geqslant r + 1$. This can only happen if $\ell < p$. In particular, this method gives no new information about ${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{C}}}({\mathrm{PSL}}_2(q))$ in the case, where $q$ is a power of $2$.
\[ex2.psl\] Let $p = 31$ and $q = p^2 = 961$. Then $(q-1)/2 = 960$ is divisible by $2^6$. Thus Proposition \[prop.psl2\] yields
\(a) ${\operatorname{ed}^{\rm loc}}({\mathrm{PSL}}_2(961)) =2$ but (b) ${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{C}}}({\mathrm{PSL}}_2(961)) \geqslant 5$.
Now let $q = p = 65537$. Note that $p$ is a Fermat prime, $p = 2^{16} + 1$. Here Proposition \[prop.psl2\] yields
\(a) ${\operatorname{ed}^{\rm loc}}({\mathrm{PSL}}_2(65537)) =2$ but (b) ${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{C}}}({\mathrm{PSL}}_2(65537)) \geqslant 15$.
In both cases the inequality (b) is conditional on Ledet’s conjecture.
\[rem3.psl2\] It follows from [@reichstein-cremona Theorem 2] that for any $d \geqslant 1$ there are only finitely many non-abelian simple finite groups $G$ such that ${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{C}}}(G) \leqslant d$. In some ways this assertion is more satisfying than the inequality of Proposition \[prop.psl2\](b): it is unconditional (does not rely on Ledet’s conjecture), and it covers all finite simple groups, not just those of the form ${\mathrm{PSL}}_2(q)$. On the other hand, it does not give an explicit lower bound on ${\operatorname{ed}}_{{\mathbb{C}}}(G)$ for any particular finite simple group $G$.
Proof of Theorem \[thm.main\] {#sect.proof}
=============================
We begin by remarking that an étale gerbe ${{\mathscr}{X}}{\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}S$ is weakly tame if and only if there exists an étale cover $\{S_i {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}S\}$ such that each ${{\mathscr}{X}}_{S_i} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}S_i$ is equivalent to ${{\mathscr}{B}}_{S_i}G_i {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}S_i$ with $G_i$ weakly tame étale group schemes over $S_i$.
Our proof of Theorem \[thm.main\] will rely on the following Lemma \[lem.versal\]. To state it, we need the notion of *versal object* of an algebraic stack. This is standard for classifying stacks of algebraic groups, but does not seem to be in the literature in the general case, so a short discussion is in order.
Let ${{\mathscr}{X}}{\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{\operatorname{Spec}}F$ be an algebraic stack of finite type over a field. Then ${{\mathscr}{X}}$ preserves inductive limits, in the following sense: if $\{A_{i}\}$ is an inductive system of $F$-algebras over a filtered poset, the induced functor ${\varinjlim}{{\mathscr}{X}}(A_{i}) {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}({\varinjlim}A_{i})$ is an equivalence of categories. If $L$ is an extension of $F$ then we can view $L$ as the inductive limit of its subalgebras $R \subseteq K$ of finite type over $F$; hence, given an object $\xi \in {{\mathscr}{X}}(L)$, there exists a finitely generated subalgebra $R \subseteq K$ and an object $\xi_{R} \in {{\mathscr}{X}}(R)$ whose image in ${{\mathscr}{X}}(L)$ is isomorphic to $\xi$.
We say that an object $\xi \in {{\mathscr}{X}}(L)$ is *versal* if it satisfies the following condition, which expresses the fact that every object of ${{\mathscr}{X}}$ over an extension of $F$ can be obtained by specialization of $\xi$.
For any $R$ and $\xi_{R}$ as above, and any object $\eta \in {{\mathscr}{X}}(K)$ over an extension $K$ of $F$ that is an infinite field, there exists a homomorphism of $F$-algebras $R {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}K$ such that the image of $\xi_{R}$ in ${{\mathscr}{X}}(K)$ under the induced functor ${{\mathscr}{X}}(R) {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}(K)$ is isomorphic to $\eta$.
Versal object don’t exist in general; for example, they don’t exist when ${{\mathscr}{X}}$ has positive-dimensional moduli space. When they do exist, however, they control the essential dimension, that is, $\xi \in {{\mathscr}{X}}(L)$ is versal, then the essential dimension of $\xi$ is easily seen to be the essential dimension of ${{\mathscr}{X}}$ (in other words, no object of ${{\mathscr}{X}}$ defined over a field can have essential dimension larger than that of $\xi$).
\[lem.versal\] Let ${{\mathscr}{X}}_{F} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{\operatorname{Spec}}F$ be a finite étale gerbe over a field $F$. Suppose that $A$ is a non-zero finite $F$-algebra, and that the morphism ${\operatorname{Spec}}A {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{\operatorname{Spec}}F$ has a lifting $\phi\colon {\operatorname{Spec}}A {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}_{F}$. Consider the locally free sheaf $\phi_{*}{{\mathscr}{O}}_{{\operatorname{Spec}}A}$ on ${{\mathscr}{X}}_{F}$; call ${{\mathscr}{V}}{\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}_{F}$ the corresponding vector bundle on ${{\mathscr}{X}}_{F}$. Then ${{\mathscr}{V}}$ has a non-empty open subscheme $U \subseteq {{\mathscr}{V}}$. Furthermore, if $k(U)$ is the field of rational functions on $U$, the composite ${\operatorname{Spec}}k(U) {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}U \subseteq {{\mathscr}{V}}{\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}_{F}$ gives a versal object of ${{\mathscr}{X}}_{F}\bigl(k(U)\bigr)$.
Let us show that ${{\mathscr}{V}}$ is generically a scheme. We can extend the base field $F$, so that it is algebraically closed; in this case ${{\mathscr}{X}}_{F}$ is the classifying space ${{\mathscr}{B}}_{F}G$ of a finite group $G$, and there exists a homomorphism of $F$-algebras $A {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}F$. The vector bundle ${{\mathscr}{V}}{\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}_{F}$ corresponds to a representation $V$ of $G$; by the semicontinuity of the degree of the stabilizer for finite group actions, it is enough to show that $V$ has a point with trivial stabilizer. The homomorphism $A {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}F$ gives a morphism ${\operatorname{Spec}}F {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{\operatorname{Spec}}A$, and the composite ${\operatorname{Spec}}F {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{\operatorname{Spec}}A {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{B}}_{F}G$ corresponds to the trivial $G$-torsor on ${\operatorname{Spec}}F$. If we call ${{\mathscr}{W}}$ the pushforward of ${{\mathscr}{O}}_{{\operatorname{Spec}}F}$ to ${{\mathscr}{B}}_{F}G$, then ${{\mathscr}{W}}\subseteq {{\mathscr}{V}}$. On the other hand ${{\mathscr}{W}}$ corresponds to the regular representation of $G$, and so the generic stabilizer is trivial, which proves what we want.
Let us show that the composite ${\operatorname{Spec}}k(U) {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}U \subseteq {{\mathscr}{V}}{\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}_{F}$ is versal; the argument is standard. Suppose that $K$ is an extension of $F$ that is an infinite field, and consider a morphism ${\operatorname{Spec}}K {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}_{F}$. It is enough to prove that for any open subscheme $U \subseteq {{\mathscr}{V}}$, the morphism ${\operatorname{Spec}}K {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}_{F}$ factors through $U \subseteq {{\mathscr}{V}}{\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}_{F}$. The pullback $V_{K} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{\operatorname{Spec}}K$ of ${{\mathscr}{V}}{\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}_{F}$ is a vector space on $K$, and the inverse image $U_{K} \subseteq V_{K}$ of $U \subseteq {{\mathscr}{V}}$ is a non-empty open subscheme; hence $U_{K}(K) \neq \emptyset$, which ends the proof.
Let $\widehat{R}$ be the completion of $R$ and $\widehat{K}$ be the fraction field of $\widehat{R}$. Then clearly $K \subset \widehat{K}$ and thus ${\operatorname{ed}}_{K}({{\mathscr}{X}}_K) \geqslant {\operatorname{ed}}_{\widehat{K}}({{\mathscr}{X}}_{\widehat{K}})$. Thus for the purpose of proving Theorem \[thm.main\], we may replace $R$ by $\widehat{R}$. In other words, we may (and will) assume that $R$ is complete.
Let $R {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}A$ be an étale faithfully flat algebra such that ${{\mathscr}{X}}(A) \neq \emptyset$; since $R$ is henselian, by passing to a component of ${\operatorname{Spec}}A$ we can assume that $R {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}A$ is finite. An object of ${{\mathscr}{X}}(A)$ gives a lifting $\phi\colon {\operatorname{Spec}}A {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}$; this is flat and finite. Let ${{\mathscr}{V}}{\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}$ be the vector bundle corresponding to $\phi_{*}{{\mathscr}{O}}_{{\operatorname{Spec}}A}$. If $U {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{V}}$ is the largest open subscheme of ${{\mathscr}{V}}$, the Lemma above implies that $U {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{\operatorname{Spec}}R$ is surjective. Denote by $U_{K}$ and $U_{k}$ respectively the generic and special fiber of $U {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{\operatorname{Spec}}R$; call $E$ and $E_{0}$ the fields of rational functions on $U_{K}$ and $U_{k}$ respectively. Again because of the Lemma, the objects $\xi\colon {\operatorname{Spec}}E {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}_{K}$ and $\xi_{0}\colon {\operatorname{Spec}}E_{0} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}_{k}$ are versal.
Consider the local ring ${{\mathscr}{O}}_{E}$ of $U$ at the generic point of $U_{k}$, which is a DVR. The residue field of ${{\mathscr}{O}}_{E}$ is $E_{0}$, and we have a morphism $\Xi\colon {\operatorname{Spec}}{{\mathscr}{O}}_{E} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}$ whose restrictions to ${\operatorname{Spec}}K$ and ${\operatorname{Spec}}k$ are isomorphic to $\xi$ and $\xi_{0}$ respectively.
Set $m {\mathrel{\smash{\overset{\mathrm{\scriptscriptstyle def}} =}}}{\operatorname{ed}}_{K}{{\mathscr}{X}}_{K}$; we need to show that $\xi_{0}$ has a compression of transcendence degree at most $m$.
There exists a field of definition $K \subseteq L \subseteq E$ for $\xi$ such that ${\operatorname{trdeg}}_{K}L = m$; call $\theta\colon {\operatorname{Spec}}L {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}$ the corresponding morphism, so that we have a factorization ${\operatorname{Spec}}E {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{\operatorname{Spec}}L {\xrightarrow}{\theta} {{\mathscr}{X}}$ for $\xi$. Consider the intersection ${{\mathscr}{O}}_{L}{\mathrel{\smash{\overset{\mathrm{\scriptscriptstyle def}} =}}}{{\mathscr}{O}}_{E} \cap L \subseteq E$; then ${{\mathscr}{O}}_{L}$ is a DVR with quotient field $L$. Call $L_{0}$ it residue field; we have $L_{0} \subseteq E_{0}$. By Lemma \[lem.valuation\], ${\operatorname{trdeg}}_{k}L_{0} \leqslant{\operatorname{trdeg}}_{K}L$.
Now it suffices to show that $\xi_{0}\colon {\operatorname{Spec}}E_{0} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}$ factors through ${\operatorname{Spec}}L_{0}$. Assume that we have proved that the morphism $\theta\colon {\operatorname{Spec}}L {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}$ extends to a morphism $\Theta\colon {\operatorname{Spec}}{{\mathscr}{O}}_{L} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}$. The composite ${\operatorname{Spec}}E \subseteq {\operatorname{Spec}}{{\mathscr}{O}}_{E} {\xrightarrow}{\Xi} {{\mathscr}{X}}$ is isomorphic to the composite ${\operatorname{Spec}}E {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{\operatorname{Spec}}L \subseteq {\operatorname{Spec}}{{\mathscr}{O}}_{L} {\xrightarrow}{\Theta} {{\mathscr}{X}}$; since ${{\mathscr}{X}}$ is separated, it follows from the valuative criterion of separation that the composite ${\operatorname{Spec}}{{\mathscr}{O}}_{E} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{\operatorname{Spec}}{{\mathscr}{O}}_{L} {\xrightarrow}{\Theta} {{\mathscr}{X}}$ is isomorphic to $\Xi\colon {\operatorname{Spec}}{{\mathscr}{O}}_{E} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}$. By restricting to the central fibers we deduce that $\xi_{0}\colon {\operatorname{Spec}}E_{0} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}$ is isomorphic to the composite ${\operatorname{Spec}}E_{0} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{\operatorname{Spec}}L_{0} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}$, and we are done.
To prove the existence of the extension $\Theta\colon {\operatorname{Spec}}{{\mathscr}{O}}_{L} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}$, notice that the uniqueness of such extension implies that to prove its existence we can pass to a finite étale extension $R \subseteq R'$, where $R'$ is a DVR; it is straightforward to check that formation of ${{\mathscr}{O}}_{L}$ and ${{\mathscr}{O}}_{E}$ commutes with such a base change. Hence we can assume that ${{\mathscr}{X}}$ has a section, so that ${{\mathscr}{X}}= {{\mathscr}{B}}_{R}G$, where $G{\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{\operatorname{Spec}}R$ is a finite étale weakly tame group scheme. By passing to a further covering we can assume that $G {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{\operatorname{Spec}}R$ is constant, that is, the product of ${\operatorname{Spec}}R$ with a finite group $\Gamma$. If $A$ is an $R$-algebra, an action of $G$ on ${\operatorname{Spec}}A$ corresponds to an action of $\Gamma$.
The vector bundle ${{\mathscr}{V}}{\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}$ corresponds to a vector bundle $V_{R} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{\operatorname{Spec}}R$ with an $R$-linear action of $\Gamma$, such that the induced representations of $\Gamma$ on $V_{K}$ and $V_{k}$ are faithful. Call $\widetilde{E}$ the function field of $V_{K}$ and $\widetilde{E}_{0}$ the function field of $V_{k}$; then $\widetilde{E}^{\Gamma} = E$, and therefore ${{\mathscr}{O}}_{\widetilde{E}}^{\Gamma} = {{\mathscr}{O}}_{E}$. The factorization ${\operatorname{Spec}}E{\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{\operatorname{Spec}}L {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}$ gives a $\Gamma$-torsor ${\operatorname{Spec}}\widetilde{L} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{\operatorname{Spec}}L$ whose lift to ${\operatorname{Spec}}E$ is isomorphic to ${\operatorname{Spec}}\widetilde{E} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{\operatorname{Spec}}E$; then $\widetilde{L}$ is a $\Gamma$-invariant subfield of $\widetilde{E}$. Then ${{\mathscr}{O}}_{\widetilde{L}} {\mathrel{\smash{\overset{\mathrm{\scriptscriptstyle def}} =}}}\widetilde{L} \cap {{\mathscr}{O}}_{\widetilde{E}}$ is a $\Gamma$-invariant DVR, and ${{\mathscr}{O}}_{\widetilde{L}}^{\Gamma} = \widetilde{L}^{\Gamma} \cap {{\mathscr}{O}}_{\widetilde{E}}^{\Gamma} = {{\mathscr}{O}}_{L}$.
Call ${\mathfrak{m}}_{\widetilde{L}} \subseteq {{\mathscr}{O}}_{\widetilde{L}}$ the maximal ideal, and set $\widetilde{L}_{0} {\mathrel{\smash{\overset{\mathrm{\scriptscriptstyle def}} =}}}{{\mathscr}{O}}_{\widetilde{L}}/{\mathfrak{m}}_{\widetilde{L}}$. If $t \in R$ is the uniformizing parameter, the image of $t$ in ${{\mathscr}{O}}_{\widetilde{L}}$, which we denote again by $t$, is a uniformizing parameter; this is $\Gamma$-invariant. The action of $\Gamma$ on ${{\mathscr}{O}}_{\widetilde{L}}$ descends to an action of $\Gamma$ on $\widetilde{L}_{0}$. By Proposition \[prop.faithful\], this action is faithful.
So the action of $\Gamma$ on ${\operatorname{Spec}}L_{0}$ is free over $k$; this implies that the action of $\Gamma$ on ${\operatorname{Spec}}{{\mathscr}{O}}_{\widetilde{L}} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{\operatorname{Spec}}R$ is free, so ${\operatorname{Spec}}{{\mathscr}{O}}_{\widetilde{L}} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}({\operatorname{Spec}}{{\mathscr}{O}}_{\widetilde{L}})/G = {\operatorname{Spec}}{{\mathscr}{O}}_{L}$ is a $\Gamma$-torsor. This gives the desired morphism $\Theta\colon {\operatorname{Spec}}{{\mathscr}{O}}_{L} {\ifinner\to\else\longrightarrow\fi}{{\mathscr}{X}}$, and ends the proof of the Theorem.
\[remex\] The problem with the proof of [@brosnan-reichstein-vistoli3 Theorem 5.11] was in the last sentence of the second paragraph on page 1094. We claimed there that the discrete valuation ring $R$ in the proof can be replaced with the ring called $W(k(s))$. Since the essential dimension of the generic point can go up when we make this replacement, this is, in fact, not allowable. (In effect, our mistake boils down to using an inequality in the wrong direction.)
Note also that the proof of the characteristic $0$ genericity theorem in [@brv1a] does not rely on Theorem \[thmbrv3\]. For that argument, which was different from the proof of [@brosnan-reichstein-vistoli3 Theorem 6.1], see [@brv1a Theorem 4.1].
[^1]: Patrick Brosnan was partially supported by NSF grant DMS 1361159.
[^2]: Zinovy Reichstein was partially supported by National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery grant 253424-2017.
[^3]: Angelo Vistoli was partially supported by research funds from the Scuola Normale Superiore.
[^4]: The authors are grateful to the Collaborative Research Group in Geometric and Cohomological Methods in Algebra at the Pacific Institute for the Mathematical Sciences for their support of this project.
[^5]: By a theorem of T. Nakayama [@nakayama], $G$ is weakly tame at $p$ if and only if $G$ admits a faithful completely reducible representation over some (and thus every) field of characteristic $p$. The significance of this condition in the study of essential dimension of finite groups was first observed by R. Lötscher [@lotscher]. Note that Lötscher used the term “semifaithful" in place of “weakly tame".
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We consider the torsion function for the Dirichlet Laplacian $-\Delta$, and for the Schrödinger operator $- \Delta + V$ on an open set $\Omega\subset {\mathbb{R}}^m$, with Lebesgue measure $0<|\Omega|<\infty$, with a real-valued, non-negative, measurable potential $V.$ We investigate the phenomena of vanishing efficiency and localisation, and large efficiency for the torsion function and the first Dirichlet eigenfunction.'
author:
- |
[M. van den Berg]{}\
School of Mathematics, University of Bristol\
Fry Building, Woodland Road\
Bristol BS8 1UG, United Kingdom\
`[email protected]`\
\
[D. Bucur]{}\
Laboratoire de Mathématiques, Université Savoie Mont Blanc\
UMR CNRS 5127\
Campus Scientifique, 73376 Le-Bourget-Du-Lac, France\
`[email protected]`\
\
[T. Kappeler]{}\
Institut für Mathematik, Universität Zürich\
Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland\
`[email protected]`
date: 13 May 2020
title: On efficiency and localisation for the torsion function
---
3truecm
[ Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)]{}: 35J05, 35J25, 35K05, 35P99.
**Keywords**: Torsion function, first Dirichlet eigenfunction, Schrödinger operator, Dirichlet boundary condition, localisation, efficiency.
Introduction and main results \[sec1\]
======================================
Let $\Omega$ be an open set in ${\mathbb{R}}^m$, with finite Lebesgue measure, $0 < |\Omega| < \infty$, and boundary $\partial\Omega$, and let $V:\Omega\rightarrow {\mathbb{R}}^+,\, {\mathbb{R}}^+= [0,\infty) $ be measurable. Let $$L=-\Delta+V,$$ be the Schrödinger operator acting in $L^2(\Omega)$. Throughout this paper we denote by $\Vert\cdot\Vert_p$ the standard $L^p$ norm, $1\le p\le \infty$. It is well-known ([@vdBC],[@vdB]) that the first eigenvalue of the Dirichlet Laplacian defined by $$\lambda_1(\Omega)=\inf_{\varphi\in
H_0^1(\Omega)\setminus\{0\}}\frac{\Vert \nabla\varphi\Vert_2^2}{
\Vert \varphi\Vert_2^2},$$ is bounded away from $0$. Furthermore $$\label{e3}
-\Delta v=1,\, \qquad v\in H_0^{ 1 }(\Omega),$$ has a unique solution denoted by $v_{\Omega}$. The function $v_{\Omega}$ is non-negative, pointwise increasing in $\Omega$, and satisfies, $$\label{e4}
\lambda_1(\Omega)^{-1}< \|v_{\Omega}\|_{\infty}\le
(4+3m\log 2)\lambda_1(\Omega)^{-1}.$$ The $m$-dependent constant in the right-hand side of has subsequently been improved ([@GS],[@HV]). We denote the sharp constant by $$\label{e5}
\mathfrak{c}_m=\sup\{\lambda_1(\Omega)\|v_{\Omega}\|_{\infty}:\Omega\,\textup{ open in }\,{\mathbb{R}}^m,\,|\Omega|<\infty\}.$$
Similarly, $Lv = 1$ has a unique solution $v_{\Omega, V}\in H^1_0(\Omega)$, referred to as the torsion function for $L$.
In this paper we consider the [*efficiency*]{} of the torsion function, and its localisation. The notion of efficiency, or mean to max ratio, goes back to [@ps] and [@sperb], where it was introduced for the first Dirichlet eigenfunction. Here we state the analogous definition for the torsion function of a Schrödinger operator on an open set $\Omega \subset {\mathbb{R}}^m $ with $0 < | \Omega| < \infty$.
\[def1\] Let $\Omega$ be an open set in ${\mathbb{R}}^m$ with $0 < |\Omega | < \infty,$ and let $V: \Omega \to {\mathbb{R}}^+$ be measurable. The [*efficiency*]{} of $v_{\Omega,V}$ is $$\Phi(\Omega,V)=\frac{\|v_{\Omega,V}\|_1}{|\Omega|
\|v_{\Omega,V}\|_\infty}.$$ Let $(\Omega_n)$ be a sequence of open sets in ${\mathbb{R}}^m$ with $0<|\Omega_n|<\infty$, and let $V_n:\Omega_n\rightarrow {\mathbb{R}}^+$ be a sequence of measurable functions. We say that $(v_{\Omega_n,V_n})$ has vanishing efficiency if $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\Phi(\Omega_n,V_n)=0$.
If $V=0$, then $\Phi(\Omega,0)\equiv \Phi(\Omega)$ coincides with the definition in [@DPGGLB].
Our first two results concern the comparison of $\Phi(\Omega,V)$ and $\Phi(\Omega)$.
\[the1\] If $\Omega$ is an open set in ${\mathbb{R}}^m$ with $0<|\Omega|<\infty$, and if $V: \Omega \to {\mathbb{R}}^+$ is measurable with $0\le V \le c$, then $$\label{e7}
\Phi(\Omega,V)\le 2^{2(3m+4)c/\lambda_1(\Omega)}\frac{8c+\lambda_1(\Omega)}{\lambda_1(\Omega)}\bigg(\frac{8c+\lambda_1(\Omega)}{8c}\bigg)^{8c/\lambda_1(\Omega)}\Phi(\Omega),$$ and $$\label{e8}
\Phi(\Omega,V)\ge 2^{-2(3m+4)c/\lambda_1(\Omega)}\frac{\lambda_1(\Omega)}{8c+\lambda_1(\Omega)}\bigg(\frac{8c}{8c+\lambda_1(\Omega)}\bigg)^{8c/\lambda_1(\Omega)}\Phi(\Omega).$$ Furthermore for fixed $\Omega$ the right-hand sides of and converge to $\Phi(\Omega)$ as $c\downarrow 0$.
\[the2\] Let $(\Omega_n)$ be a sequence of open sets in ${\mathbb{R}}^m$ with $0 < |\Omega_n|<\infty$, and let $V_n:\Omega_n\to {\mathbb{R}}^+$ be a sequence of measurable functions. If there exists $\eta<\infty$ such that $\sup_{n\in{\mathbb{N}}}\frac{\| V_n \|_{\infty}}{\lambda_1(\Omega_n)} \le \eta,$ then $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\Phi(\Omega_n,V_n)=0$ if and only if $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\Phi(\Omega_n)=0$.
In [@HLP] it was shown that if $m\ge 2$, then $$\inf\{\Phi(\Omega):\Omega\subset {\mathbb{R}}^m,\,\Omega\,\,\,\textup{open},\, 0 < |\Omega|<\infty\}=0,$$ and $$\label{e17a}
\sup\{\Phi(\Omega):\Omega\subset {\mathbb{R}}^m,\,\Omega\,\,\,\textup{open},\, 0 < |\Omega|<\infty\}=1.$$
The analogous result for Schrödinger operators reads as follows.
\[the3\] If $\Omega$ is a fixed open set in ${\mathbb{R}}^m$ with $0 < | \Omega | < \infty$, then $$\label{e51}
\sup\{\Phi(\Omega,V): ( V:\Omega\rightarrow {\mathbb{R}}^+, \textup{measurable})\}=1,$$ and $$\label{e52}
\inf\{\Phi(\Omega,V): ( V:\Omega\rightarrow {\mathbb{R}}^+, \textup{measurable})\}=\Phi(\Omega).$$ In fact, $$\label{e50}
1>\Phi(\Omega,c) \ge 1-\frac{2^{(m+4)/2}}{|\Omega|}\int_{\Omega}dx\,e^{-c^{1/2}d_{\Omega}(x)/2}, \qquad \forall c\ge 0,$$ where $d_\Omega : \Omega \to {\mathbb{R}}^+$ is the distance function to the boundary, $$d_{\Omega}(x)=\min\{|x-y|:y\in {\mathbb{R}}^m\setminus\Omega\}.$$
We denote the spectrum of $L$ with Dirichlet boundary conditions by $$\{\lambda_1(\Omega,V)\le \lambda_2(\Omega,V)\le \cdots\},$$ accumulating at infinity only. We denote a corresponding $L^2$-orthonormal basis of eigenfunctions by $\{\varphi_{1,\Omega,V}, \varphi_{2,\Omega,V},\cdots\}.$ If the first Dirichlet eigenvalue $\lambda_1(\Omega,V)$ of $L$ has multiplicity $1$, then its corresponding eigenspace is one-dimensional, and $\varphi_{1,\Omega,V}$ is uniquely defined up to a sign. Since $\varphi_{1,\Omega,V}$ does not change sign we may choose $\varphi_{1,\Omega,V}>0.$ If $\lambda_1(\Omega,V)$ is simple, then we define the efficiency of $\varphi_{1, \Omega, V}$ by $$E(\Omega,V)=\frac{\|\varphi_{1, \Omega, V}\|_1}{| \Omega | \, \| \varphi_{1, \Omega, V} \|_{\infty}} .$$ If $V=0$, then we write $$E(\Omega)=E(\Omega,0) \ , \qquad \lambda_1(\Omega) = \lambda_1(\Omega,0).$$ We note that if $\Omega$ is connected, then $\lambda_1(\Omega)$ is simple.
By [@vdBFNT Theorem 1.2] and [@vdB1 Theorem 1] it is possible for $m\ge 2$ to construct, for any $\varepsilon\in(0,1)$, an open connected set $\Omega_{\varepsilon}\subset {\mathbb{R}}^m$ such that both $$\frac{\lambda_1(\Omega_{\varepsilon})\|v_{\Omega_{\varepsilon}}\|_1}{|\Omega_{\varepsilon}|}>1-\varepsilon,$$ and $$\lambda_1(\Omega_{\varepsilon})\|v_{\Omega_{\varepsilon}}\|_{\infty}<1+\varepsilon.$$ This implies that $$\Phi(\Omega_{\varepsilon}) \ge \frac{1-\varepsilon}{1+\varepsilon},\qquad\forall\varepsilon\in(0,1),$$ which in turn implies . We were unable to prove that $E(\Omega_{\varepsilon})>1-\varepsilon,\,\forall\varepsilon\in(0,1)$. Nevertheless have the following:
\[the7\] If $m\ge 2$, then $$\sup\{E(\Omega):\Omega\subset {\mathbb{R}}^m,\,\Omega\,\,\,\textup{open and connected},\,0 < |\Omega|<\infty\}=1.$$
By examining the proof of Theorem \[the7\] in Section \[sec5\] we see that for any $m\ge 2$, and $\varepsilon \in (0,1)$ there exists an open, bounded and connected set $\Omega_{\varepsilon}\subset {\mathbb{R}}^m$ such that (i) $E(\Omega_{\varepsilon})\ge 1-\varepsilon$, and (ii) $\lambda_1(\Omega_{\varepsilon})|\Omega_{\varepsilon}|^{2/m} $ is large for $\varepsilon$ small. In Theorem \[the9\] below we show that is a general phenomenon. That is if $\Omega$ is any open and connected set in $ {\mathbb{R}}^m, \,m\ge 2,$ such the mean to max ratio of the first Dirichlet eigenfunction is close to $1$, then the eigenfunction is close to its maximum on most of $\Omega$, and $\lambda_1(\Omega)|\Omega|^{2/m}$ is large. We have a similar phenomenon for the torsion function. Throughout we denote for $\Omega$ open with $0<|\Omega|<\infty$, and $u\in L^1(\Omega),$ $$\fint_{\Omega}u := \frac{1}{|\Omega|} \int_{\Omega} u.$$
\[the9\] Let $m\ge 2$ and let $\Omega$ be a non-empty open set in ${\mathbb{R}}^m$ with finite Lebesgue measure, $|\Omega|<+\infty$.
- If $u\in H_0^1(\Omega)\cap L^{\infty}(\Omega)\cap\{u\ne 0\}$, and if $$\fint_{\Omega}u\ge \frac{2\|u\|_{\infty}}{m+2}\,$$ then $$\label{p22}
\bigg(\frac{\omega_m}{|\Omega |}\bigg)^{(2-m)/2}
\bigg(\|u\|_{\infty}-\fint_{\Omega}u\bigg)\int_{\Omega}|\nabla u|^2\ge \frac{4m^2}{(m+2)^2}\omega_m\|u\|^3_{\infty}.$$ Equality occurs if and only if $\Omega$ is a ball, and $u$ is a multiple of the torsion function.
- $$\label{p22a}
\|v_{\Omega}\|_{\infty}\le
\frac{(m+2)^2}{4m^2} \bigg(\frac{|\Omega|}{\omega_m}\bigg)^{2/m}(1-\Phi(\Omega)),$$
$$\label{p22b}
\lambda_1(\Omega)\ge
\frac{4m^2}{(m+2)^2} \bigg(\frac{\omega_m}{|\Omega |}\bigg)^{2/m}(1-\Phi(\Omega))^{-1}.$$
- If $\Omega$ is connected, then $$\label{p22c}
\lambda_1(\Omega)\ge
\frac{4m^2}{(m+2)^2} \bigg(\frac{\omega_m}{|\Omega |}\bigg)^{2/m}(1-E(\Omega))^{-1}.$$
We now introduce the notion of $(\kappa, \delta)$-localisation of the torsion function of a Schrödinger operator on a non-empty open set $\Omega$ with finite Lebesgue measure. We refer to [@grebenkov] for a related notion of localisation for Dirichlet eigenfunctions.
\[def2\] Let $\Omega$ be an open set in ${\mathbb{R}}^m$ with $0 <|\Omega|<\infty$, and let $V:\Omega \to {\mathbb{R}}^+$ be measurable. Let $0 < \kappa<1, 0<\delta < 1.$ We say that $v_{\Omega, V}$ $(\kappa, \delta)$-localises on a measurable subset $A \subset \Omega$ if $$\frac{|A|}{|\Omega|} \le \delta,\qquad
\frac{\int_A v_{\Omega, V}}{\|v_{\Omega, V}\|_1}
\ge \kappa.$$ We say that $v_{\Omega, V}$ $(\kappa, \delta)$-localises if there exists a measurable subset $A \subset \Omega$ so that $v_{\Omega, V}$ $(\kappa, \delta)$-localises on $A$.
In Example \[exa1\] in Section \[sec3\] we analyse a one parameter family of Schrödinger operators in one dimension, where $(\kappa,\delta)$-localisation occurs for certain parameter choices.
The following definition defines localisation of the torsion function for sequences $(\Omega_n,V_n)$, and complements Definition \[def2\] above.
\[def3\] Let $(\Omega_n)$ be a sequence of open sets in ${\mathbb{R}}^m$ with $0 < |\Omega_n|<\infty$, and let $V_n:\Omega_n\to {\mathbb{R}}^+,$ be a sequence of measurable functions. Furthermore, let $$\label{e11}
\mathfrak{A}((\Omega_n))=\bigg\{(A_n): (\forall n\in {\mathbb{N}})(A_n\subset\Omega_n, A_n\, \textup{measurable}), \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{|A_n|}{|\Omega_n|}=0\bigg\}$$ and let $$\label{e12}
\kappa=\sup\bigg\{\limsup_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\int_{A_{n}}v_{\Omega_n,V_n}}{\|v_{\Omega_n,V_n}\|_1}:(A_n)\in\mathfrak{A}((\Omega_n))\bigg\}.$$ We say that $(v_{\Omega_n,V_n})$ $\kappa$-[*localises*]{} if $\kappa>0$, $(v_{\Omega_n,V_n})$ [*localises*]{} if holds with $\kappa=1$.
In Example \[exa2\] in Section \[sec4\] we analyse a sequence of open sets in ${\mathbb{R}}^2$ where localisation occurs for certain parameter choices. For one specific parameter choice the sequence of torsion functions is $\kappa$-localising with $0<\kappa<1$.
The theorem below asserts that localisation implies vanishing efficiency.
\[the5\] Let $(\Omega_n)$ be a sequence of open sets in ${\mathbb{R}}^m$ with $0 < |\Omega_n|<\infty$ and let $V_n:\Omega_n\to {\mathbb{R}}^+$ be a sequence of measurable functions. If $(v_{\Omega_n,V_n})$ localises, then $(v_{\Omega_n,V_n})$ has vanishing efficiency, $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\Phi(\Omega_n,V_n)=0.$
It follows from Theorem 1.1 in [@DPGGLB] that, when restricting $\Omega$ to be open, bounded and convex in ${\mathbb{R}}^m,\, m\ge 1$, one has $$\label{e70}
\frac{2}{m(m+2)}\le \inf\{\Phi(\Omega): \Omega\subset {\mathbb{R}}^m,\,\Omega\,\,\,\textup{open,\,convex},\,|\Omega|<\infty\}.$$ We see by that any sequence $(\Omega_n)$ of elongating open, bounded and convex sets in ${\mathbb{R}}^m$ has non-vanishing efficiency, and so by Theorem \[the5\], $(v_{\Omega_n,0})$ is not localising. This is in contrast with the results of [@vdBBDPG], where localisation of the first Dirichlet eigenfunction in $L^2(\Omega_n)$ was obtained for a wide class of elongating, open, bounded, convex sets in ${\mathbb{R}}^m$. Further examples demonstrating different behaviour of the torsion function and the first eigenfunction of the Dirichlet Laplacian around their respective maxima for elongated convex planar domains have been constructed in [@Beck].
Theorem \[the8\] below, asserts that (under suitable hypotheses), vanishing efficiency for the torsion function implies localisation for the first Dirichlet eigenfunction. We make two further definitions.
\[def4\] Let $\Omega \subset {\mathbb{R}}^m$ be an open set with $0 <|\Omega|<\infty$, and let $V:\Omega\rightarrow {\mathbb{R}}^+$ be measurable, such that $\lambda_1(\Omega,V)$ has multiplicity $1$. Let $0 < \kappa<1,\, 0< \delta < 1.$ We say that $\varphi_{1, \Omega,V}$ $(\kappa, \delta)$-localises if there exists a measurable subset $A \subset \Omega$ with $$\frac{|A|}{|\Omega|} < \delta,\qquad
\frac{\int_A \varphi_{1, \Omega,V}}
{\|\varphi_{1, \Omega, V}\|_1}
\ge \kappa.$$
Following Definition \[def3\] we also introduce the notion of localisation for a sequence of first Dirichlet eigenfunctions.
\[def5\] Let $(\Omega_n)$ be a sequence of open sets in ${\mathbb{R}}^m$ with $0 < |\Omega_n|<\infty,\,n\in{\mathbb{N}}$, and let $V_n:\Omega_n\rightarrow{\mathbb{R}}^+,\,n\in {\mathbb{N}}$, be measurable, such that $\lambda_1(\Omega_n,V_n)$ has multiplicity $1$ for all $n\in {\mathbb{N}}$. Let $\mathfrak{A}((\Omega_n))$ be given by , and let $$\label{extra}
\kappa=\sup\bigg\{\limsup_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\int_{A_{n}}\varphi_{1, \Omega_n,V_n}}{
\|\varphi_{1,\Omega_n,V_n}\|_1}:(A_n)\in\mathfrak{A}((\Omega_n))\bigg\}.$$ We say that $(\varphi_{1,\Omega_n,V_n})$ $\kappa$-[*localises*]{} if $\kappa>0$, $(\varphi_{1,\Omega_n,V_n})$ [*localises*]{} if holds with $\kappa=1$.
\[the8\] Let $(\Omega_n)$ be a sequence of open subsets in ${\mathbb{R}}^m$ with $0 < |\Omega_n| < \infty$, and let $(V_n)$ be a sequence of measurable potentials, $V_n:\Omega_n\rightarrow{\mathbb{R}}^+, n\in {\mathbb{N}}$, be such that $\lambda_1(\Omega_n,V_n)$ has multiplicity $1$. If $(v_{\Omega_n,V_n})$ has vanishing efficiency, $\lim_{n \to \infty}\Phi(\Omega_n,V_n) = 0$, then $(\varphi_{1, \Omega_n,V_n})$ localises. If $(v_{\Omega_n,V_n})$ localises, then $(\varphi_{1,\Omega_n,V_n})$ localises.
This paper is organised as follows. The proofs of Theorems \[the1\], \[the2\], \[the3\], \[the5\], and \[the8\] will be given in Section \[sec2\]. Examples \[exa1\] and \[exa2\] will be analysed in Sections \[sec3\] and \[sec4\] respectively. The proofs of Theorems \[the7\] and \[the9\] will be given in Sections \[sec5\] and \[sec6\] respectively.
Proofs of Theorems \[the1\], \[the2\], \[the3\], \[the5\], and \[the8\] \[sec2\]
================================================================================
To prove Theorem \[the1\] and Theorem \[the2\], we first need to establish some auxiliary results. It is well known that the torsion function can be expressed in terms of the heat kernel of $L$. Let $\Omega \subset {\mathbb{R}}^m$ be open with $0 < |\Omega| < \infty$, and let $V:\Omega\rightarrow {\mathbb{R}}^+$ be measurable. Denote by $p_{\Omega,V}(x,y;t)$, $x\in \Omega, y\in \Omega,t > 0$ the heat kernel of $$\frac{\partial u}{\partial t} = Lu, \qquad u\in H_0^1(\Omega).$$ The torsion function of $L$ then satisfies $$\label{e24}
v_{\Omega, V}(x) = \int_{\Omega} dy \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^+} dt\, p_{\Omega,V}(x,y;t),\qquad \forall x \in \Omega\ .$$ In case $V=0$ we write $p_{\Omega}$ for $p_{\Omega,V}$.
Recall the Feynman-Kac formula (cf. [@BS]) for non-negative, measurable potentials $V:\Omega\rightarrow {\mathbb{R}}^+,$ $$p_{\Omega,V}(x,y;t) = p_{{\mathbb{R}}^m}(x,y;t) {\mathbb{E}}[e^{- \int_0^t V(\beta(s))ds} \big(\Pi_{s\in[0,t]}{\bf1}_{\Omega}(\beta(s))\big) \, : \, \beta(0)=x, \beta(t) = y ],$$ where $\beta$ is a Brownian bridge. Hence if $V_1: \Omega \to {\mathbb{R}}^+$ and $V_2: \Omega \to {\mathbb{R}}^+$ are measurable functions with $0 \le V_2 \le V_1$, then
$$\label{e26}
0\le p_{\Omega,V_1}(x,y;t)\le p_{\Omega,V_2}(x,y;t),\qquad \forall x\in \Omega, \forall y\in \Omega, \forall t>0.$$
Since $V\ge 0$ we then conclude that $$0 \le v_{\Omega, V}(x) \le v_{\Omega}(x)\le \mathfrak{c}_m\lambda_1(\Omega)^{-1}, \qquad \forall x \in \Omega,$$ with $\mathfrak{c}_m$ given by .
\[lem1\] If $0 < |\Omega|<\infty$, and if $V: \Omega \to {\mathbb{R}}^+$ is measurable, then $$\label{e29}
\lambda_{1}(\Omega, V)^{-1} \le
\|v_{\Omega,V}\|_{\infty}
\le (4+3m\log 2)\lambda_{1}(\Omega, V)^{-1}.$$
Lemma \[lem1\] implies that $$\label{e29a}
\mathfrak{d}_m:=\sup\{\lambda_1(\Omega,V)\|v_{\Omega,V}\|_{\infty}:\Omega\,\textup{ open in }\,{\mathbb{R}}^m,\,0<|\Omega|<\infty,\, V\in \mathcal{V}_{\Omega} \}<\infty,$$ where $\mathcal{V}_{\Omega}$ is the set of measurable functions from $\Omega$ into ${\mathbb{R}}^+$. By choosing $V=0$ in the expression under the supremum in the right-hand side of we see that $\mathfrak{c}_m\le \mathfrak{d}_m$.
Throughout this paper we denote by $B(p;R)=\{x\in{\mathbb{R}}^m:|x-p|<R\}$ the open ball centred at $p$ with radius $R$, $B_R=B(0;R)$, and $$\omega_m=|B_1|.$$
[*Proof of Lemma* ]{} To prove the upper bound in we note that Lemma 1 and its proof in [@vdBC] hold with $\lambda=\lambda_1(\Omega,V)$, and Lemma 2 and its proof in [@vdBC] hold for the semigroup associated with $L$. Finally Lemma 3 and Theorem 1 and their proofs in [@vdBC] hold with $\lambda=\lambda_1(\Omega,V)$. This proves the upper bound in . It remains to prove the lower bound. Let $\Omega_R=\Omega\cap B(0;R)$. Then $0<|\Omega_R|\le \omega_mR^m$. Let $L_R$ be the restriction of $-\Delta+V$ acting in $L^2(\Omega_R)$ with Dirichlet boundary conditions on $\partial \Omega_R$. If we denote $V_R={\bf1}_{B(p;R)}V,$ then $L_R$ is also the operator $-\Delta+V_R$ acting in $L^2(\Omega_R)$ with Dirichlet boundary conditions on $\partial \Omega_R$. Then $L_R$ is self-adjoint, and its spectrum is discrete. Since the first Dirichlet eigenfunction $\varphi_{1,\Omega_R,V_R}$ is non-negative, and $\| \varphi_{1,\Omega_R,V_R} \|_2 =1 $, one has, by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, $$\label{e31}
0<\int_{\Omega_R}\varphi_{1,\Omega_R,V_R}\le |\Omega_R|^{1/2}.$$ By self-adjointness $$\begin{aligned}
\label{e32}
\int_{\Omega_R}\varphi_{1,\Omega_R,V_R}
&=\int_{\Omega_R}\varphi_{1,\Omega_R,V_R}L_Rv_{\Omega_R,V_R}=
\int_{\Omega_R}\big(L_R\varphi_{1,\Omega_R,V_R}\big)v_{\Omega_R,V_R}\nonumber \\
&=\lambda_1(\Omega_R,V_R)\int_{\Omega_R}\varphi_{1,\Omega_R,V_R}v_{\Omega_R,V_R}\nonumber \\
& \le \lambda_1(\Omega_{R},V_R)\|v_{\Omega_R,V_R}\|_{\infty}\int_{\Omega_R}\varphi_{1,\Omega_R,V_R}.\end{aligned}$$ By – we conclude that $$\lambda_1(\Omega_R,V_R) \, \|v_{\Omega_R,V_R}\|_{\infty} \ge 1.$$ Since $\|v_{\Omega_R,V_R}\|_{\infty}\le \|v_{\Omega,V}\|_{\infty}$ we have that $$\lambda_1(\Omega_R,V_R) \|v_{\Omega,V}\|_{\infty}\ge 1.$$ The assertion follows since $R\mapsto \lambda_1(\Omega_R,V_R)$ is decreasing to $\lambda_1(\Omega,V)$ as $R\rightarrow\infty$. $\square$
\[lem2\] Let $\Omega\subset {\mathbb{R}}^m$ be open with $0 < |\Omega | < \infty$. If $V : \Omega \rightarrow {\mathbb{R}}^+$ is measurable with $0 \le c_1 \le V(x) \le c_2 < \infty$, $x \in \Omega$, then $$\begin{aligned}
\label{e35}
v_{\Omega,c_2}(x) \le
v_{\Omega,V}(x)\le v_{\Omega,c_1}(x)\ ,\end{aligned}$$ and for any $0 <c < \infty$, $x\in \Omega$, $$\begin{aligned}
\label{e36}
v_{\Omega,c}(x)\ge 2^{-2(3m+4)c/\lambda_1(\Omega)}\frac{\lambda_1(\Omega)}{8c+\lambda_1(\Omega)}\bigg(\frac{8c}{8c+\lambda_1(\Omega)}\bigg)^{8c/\lambda_1(\Omega)}v_{\Omega}(x).\end{aligned}$$ Hence $$\label{e37}
\|v_{\Omega,c}\|_1\ge 2^{-2(3m+4)c/\lambda_1(\Omega)}\frac{\lambda_1(\Omega)}{8c+\lambda_1(\Omega)}\bigg(\frac{8c}{8c+\lambda_1(\Omega)}\bigg)^{8c/\lambda_1(\Omega)}\|v_{\Omega}\|_1,$$ and $$\label{e38}
\|v_{\Omega,c}\|_{\infty}\ge 2^{-2(3m+4)c/\lambda_1(\Omega)}\frac{\lambda_1(\Omega)}{8c+\lambda_1(\Omega)}\bigg(\frac{8c}{8c+\lambda_1(\Omega)}\bigg)^{8c/\lambda_1(\Omega)}\|v_{\Omega}\|_{\infty}.$$ Furthermore the right-hand side of converges to $v_{\Omega}(x)$ as $c\downarrow 0$, and $$\label{e45a}
\int_{\Omega}dy\,p_{\Omega}(x,y;t)\le 2^{3m/4}e^{-t\lambda_1(\Omega)/4},\qquad \forall t>0,\, \forall x\in \Omega.$$
The two inequalities in follow immediately from , and the hypothesis $0\le c_1 \le V \le c_2$. To prove inequality , note that for any $T>0$, and any $c\ge 0$, $$\begin{aligned}
\label{e39}
v_{\Omega,c}(x)&=\int_{\Omega}dy\,\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^+}dt\, p_{\Omega,c}(x,y;t)\nonumber \\ &
=\int_{\Omega}dy\,\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^+}dt\, e^{-ct}p_{\Omega}(x,y;t)\nonumber \\ &
\ge \int_{\Omega}dy\,\int_0^Tdt\, e^{-ct}p_{\Omega}(x,y;t)\nonumber \\ &
\ge e^{-cT}\int_{\Omega}dy\,\int_0^Tdt\, p_{\Omega}(x,y;t)\nonumber \\ &
=e^{-cT}\Big(v_{\Omega}(x)-\int_T^{\infty}dt\,\int_{\Omega}dy\,p_{\Omega}(x,y;t)\Big).\end{aligned}$$ We need to estimate the double integral in the right-hand side of . By the heat semigroup property
$$p_{\Omega}(x,y;t)=\int_{\Omega}dz\,p_{\Omega}(x,z;t/2)p_{\Omega}(z,y;t/2)$$ we have $$\begin{aligned}
\label{e40}
\int_{\Omega}dy\, & p_{\Omega}(x,y;t) =\int_{\Omega}dy\,\int_{\Omega}dz\,p_{\Omega}(x,z;t/2)p_{\Omega}(z,y;t/2)\nonumber \\ &
= \int_{\Omega}dz\,p_{\Omega}(x,z;t/2)\int_{\Omega}dy\,\big(p_{\Omega}(z,y;t/2)\big)^{1/2}\big(p_{\Omega}(z,y;t/2)\big)^{1/2}.\end{aligned}$$ We estimate $p_{\Omega}(z,y;t/2)$ in terms of $\lambda_1(\Omega)$. Recall that $p_{\Omega}(x,y;t)$ can be expressed in terms of the eigenfunctions $\varphi_{j, \Omega}(x)$ by $$\label{e41}
p_{\Omega}(x,y;t) = \sum_{j =1}^{\infty} e^{- t\lambda_j(\Omega)} \varphi_{j, \Omega}(x) \varphi_{j, \Omega}(y).$$ Moreover for any $\beta\in [0,1)$, $$\label{beta}
p_{\Omega}(x,x;t)\le e^{-\beta t\lambda_1(\Omega)}p_{\Omega}(x,x;(1-\beta)t).$$ The heat kernel for ${\mathbb{R}}^m$ is given by $$\label{e42}
p_{{\mathbb{R}}^m}(x,y;t)=(4\pi t)^{-m/2}e^{-|x-y|^2/(4t)},$$ and satisfies $$\label{e43}
\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^m}dy\,p_{{\mathbb{R}}^m}(x,y;t)=1,\qquad \forall x\in {\mathbb{R}}^m,\, \forall t>0.$$ By the heat semigroup property, the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, for $\beta=\frac12$, domain monotonicity of the Dirichlet heat kernel, and we have $$\begin{aligned}
\label{e44}
p_{\Omega}(z,y;t/2)&=\int_{\Omega}dw\,p_{\Omega}(z,w;t/4)p_{\Omega}(w,y;t/4)\nonumber \\ &
\le \bigg(\int_{\Omega}dw\,\big(p_{\Omega}(z,w;t/4)\big)^2\bigg)^{1/2}\bigg(\int_{\Omega}dw\,\big(p_{\Omega}(w,y;t/4)\big)^2\bigg)^{1/2}\nonumber \\ &
=\big(p_{\Omega}(z,z;t/2)\big)^{1/2}\big(p_{\Omega}(y,y;t/2)\big)^{1/2}\nonumber \\ &
\le e^{-t\lambda_1(\Omega)/4}\big(p_{\Omega}(z,z;t/4)\big)^{1/2}\big(p_{\Omega}(y,y;t/4)\big)^{1/2}\nonumber \\ &
\le e^{-t\lambda_1(\Omega)/4}\big(p_{{\mathbb{R}}^m}(z,z;t/4)\big)^{1/2}\big(p_{{\mathbb{R}}^m}(y,y;t/4)\big)^{1/2}\nonumber \\ &
=e^{-t\lambda_1(\Omega)/4}(\pi t)^{-m/2}.\end{aligned}$$ Substituting into we find $$\begin{aligned}
\label{e45}
\int_{\Omega}dy&\,p_{\Omega}(x,y;t)\le e^{-t\lambda_1(\Omega)/8}(\pi t)^{-m/4}\int_{\Omega}dz\,p_{\Omega}(x,z;t/2)\int_{\Omega}dy\,\big(p_{\Omega}(z,y;t/2)\big)^{1/2}\nonumber \\ &
\le e^{-t\lambda_1(\Omega)/8}(\pi t)^{-m/4}\int_{\Omega}dz\,p_{\Omega}(x,z;t/2)\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^m}dy\,\big(p_{{\mathbb{R}}^m}(z,y;t/2)\big)^{1/2}\nonumber \\ &
=2^{3m/4}e^{-t\lambda_1(\Omega)/8}\int_{\Omega}dz\,p_{\Omega}(x,z;t/2).\end{aligned}$$ Integrating both sides of with respect to $t$ over the set $[T,\infty)$ gives $$\begin{aligned}
\label{e46}
\int_T^{\infty}dt\,\int_{\Omega}dy\,p_{\Omega}(x,y;t)&\le 2^{3m/4}e^{-T\lambda_1(\Omega)/8}\int_T^{\infty}dt\,\int_{\Omega}dz\,p_{\Omega}(x,z;t/2)\nonumber \\ &
\le 2^{3m/4}e^{-T\lambda_1(\Omega)/8}\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^+}dt\,\int_{\Omega}dz\,p_{\Omega}(x,z;t/2)\nonumber \\ &
=2^{(4+3m)/4}e^{-T\lambda_1(\Omega)/8}v_{\Omega}(x).\end{aligned}$$ By combining and we find $$\label{e47}
v_{\Omega,c}(x)\ge e^{-cT}\big(1-2^{(4+3m)/4}e^{-T\lambda_1(\Omega)/8}\big)v_{\Omega}(x).$$ Choosing $T$ as to maximise the right-hand side of gives that $$\label{e48}
T=\frac{8}{\lambda_1(\Omega)}\log\Big(2^{(4+3m)/4}\Big(1+\frac{\lambda_1(\Omega)}{8c}\Big)\Big).$$ Inequality then follows by and . The inequalities and follow immediately from .
To prove we have by , $$\label{e45b}
p_{\Omega}(x,y;t)\le e^{-t\lambda_1(\Omega)/2}(2\pi t)^{-m/2}.$$ By the domain monotonicity, the non-negativity of the Dirichlet heat kernel, and , $$\begin{aligned}
\int_{\Omega}dy\,p_{\Omega}(x,y;t)&\le e^{-t\lambda_1(\Omega)/4}(2\pi t)^{-m/4}\int_{\Omega}dy\,\big(p_{\Omega}(x,y;t)\big)^{1/2}\nonumber \\ &
\le e^{-t\lambda_1(\Omega)/4}(2\pi t)^{-m/4}\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^m}dy\,\big(p_{{\mathbb{R}}^m}(x,y;t)\big)^{1/2}\nonumber \\ &
=2^{3m/4}e^{-t\lambda_1(\Omega)/4},\end{aligned}$$ which proves .
[*Proof of Theorem* ]{} Since $0\le V\le c$ we have by , $$\label{e56}
\| v_{\Omega,V} \|_1 \le \| v_{\Omega} \|_1,$$ and $$\label{e57}
\|v_{\Omega,V}\|_{\infty}\ge \|v_{\Omega,c}\|_{\infty}.$$ The upper bound follows from , , and .
Similarly, by , we have $$\label{e58}
\|v_{\Omega,V}\|_{\infty}\le \|v_{\Omega}\|_{\infty}.$$ and $$\begin{aligned}
\label{e59}
\|v_{\Omega,V}\|_1\ge\|v_{\Omega,c}\|_1.\end{aligned}$$ The lower bound follows from , , and . $\square$
[*Proof of Theorem* ]{} By using the inequality $$\big(1+\theta^{-1}\big)^{\theta}\le e, \qquad \forall\theta>0,$$ with $\theta=8\Vert V_n\Vert_{\infty}/{\lambda_1(\Omega_n)}$, we obtain by , $$\Phi(\Omega_n,V_n)\le e2^{2(3m+4)\eta}(1+8\eta)\Phi(\Omega_n),$$ and by , $$\Phi(\Omega_n,V_n)\ge e^{-1}2^{-2(3m+4)\eta}(1+8\eta)^{-1}\Phi(\Omega_n).$$ This proves Theorem \[the2\]. $\square$
[*Proof of Theorem .*]{} To verify we have by Lemma 4 in [@MvdBS], $$\int_{\Omega}dy\, p_{\Omega}(x,y;t)\ge 1-2^{(m+2)/2}e^{-d_{\Omega}(x)^2/(8t)}.$$ Hence we find by that $$\label{e53}
\int_{\Omega}dx\,\int_{\Omega}dy\, p_{\Omega}(x,y;t)\ge |\Omega|-2^{(m+2)/2}\int_{\Omega}dx\,e^{-d_{\Omega}(x)^2/(8t)}.$$ Multiplying both sides of by $e^{-ct}$ and integrating with respect to $t$ gives that $$\begin{aligned}
\label{e54}
\| v_{\Omega,c} \|_1&\ge \frac{|\Omega|}{c}-2^{(m+2)/2}\int_{\Omega}dx\,\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^+}dt\, e^{-ct-d_{\Omega}(x)^2/(8t)}\nonumber \\ &
\ge \frac{|\Omega|}{c}-2^{(m+2)/2}\int_{\Omega}dx\,\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^+}dt\, e^{-ct/2}\sup\{e^{-ct/2-d_{\Omega}(x)^2/(8t)}:t>0\}\nonumber \\ &
=\frac{|\Omega|}{c}-\frac{2^{(m+4)/2}}{c}\int_{\Omega}dx\,e^{-c^{1/2}d_{\Omega}(x)/2}.\end{aligned}$$ On the other hand using , $$\begin{aligned}
\label{e55}
\| v_{\Omega,c} \|_\infty &=\sup_{x\in\Omega}\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^+}dt\, e^{-ct}\int_{\Omega}dy\, p_{\Omega}(x,y;t)\nonumber \\ &
\le\sup_{x\in\Omega}\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^+}dt\, e^{-ct}\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^m}dy\, p_{{\mathbb{R}}^m}(x,y;t)\nonumber \\ &
=\frac{1}{c}.\end{aligned}$$ The second inequality in follows from and . Finally, follows from , and Lebesgue’s dominated convergence theorem, while follows from of Theorem \[the1\]. $\square$
[*Proof of Theorem* ]{} Let $\frac12<\kappa<1$ be arbitrary, and let $(A_{n})\in\mathfrak{A}((\Omega)_n)$ be such that for all $n$ sufficiently large, $\Vert v_{\Omega_n,V_n}\Vert_1\le (2\kappa-1)^{-1}\int_{A_{n}} v_{\Omega_n,V_n}$, and $|A_n|/|\Omega_n|<1-\kappa$. Then, for all such $n$, $$\begin{aligned}
\Vert v_{\Omega_n,V_n}\Vert_1&\le (2\kappa-1)^{-1}\int_{A_{n}}v_{\Omega_n,V_n}\nonumber \\ &\le (2\kappa-1)^{-1}\Vert v_{\Omega_n,V_n}\Vert_{\infty}|A_{n}|\nonumber \\ &\le \frac{1-\kappa}{2\kappa-1}\Vert v_{\Omega_n,V_n}\Vert_{\infty}|\Omega_n|.\end{aligned}$$ Hence for all $n$ sufficiently large, $\Phi(\Omega_n,V_n)\le \frac{1-\kappa}{2\kappa-1}$. Since $\frac12<\kappa<1$ was arbitrary, $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\Phi(\Omega_n,V_n)=0.$ $\square$
Theorem \[the5\] implies that if $(\Omega_n,V_n)$ satisfies the $\eta$ condition of Theorem \[the2\], and if either $(v_{\Omega_n})$ or $(v_{\Omega_n,V_n})$ have non-vanishing efficiencies then both $(v_{\Omega_n})$ and $(v_{\Omega_n,V_n})$ are not localising.
[*Proof of Theorem* ]{} Using and we obtain $$v_{\Omega,V}(x)=\sum_{j =1}^{\infty} \lambda_j(\Omega,V)^{-1} \bigg(\int_{\Omega}\varphi_{j, \Omega,V}\bigg)\varphi_{j, \Omega,V}(x).$$ Integrating with respect to $x$ over $\Omega$ gives $$\begin{aligned}
\int_{\Omega}v_{\Omega,V}&=\sum_{j =1}^{\infty} \lambda_j(\Omega,V)^{-1} \bigg(\int_{\Omega}\varphi_{j, \Omega,V}\bigg)^2\nonumber \\ &
\ge \lambda_1(\Omega,V)^{-1} \bigg(\int_{\Omega}\varphi_{1, \Omega,V}\bigg)^2.\end{aligned}$$ Multiplying both sides with $\lambda_1(\Omega,V)$, and using the definition of $\mathfrak{d}_m$ in gives $$\mathfrak{d}_m\frac{\|v_{\Omega,V}\|_1}{\|v_{\Omega,V}\|_{\infty}}\ge \bigg(\int_{\Omega}\varphi_{1, \Omega,V}\bigg)^2.$$ This implies that $$\mathfrak{d}_m\Phi(\Omega,V)\ge \frac{1}{|\Omega|}\bigg(\int_{\Omega}\varphi_{1, \Omega,V}\bigg)^2.$$ If $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\Phi(\Omega_n,V_n)=0$, then it follows that $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{1}{|\Omega_n|}\big(\int_{\Omega_n}\varphi_{1, \Omega_n,V_n}\big)^2=0$. This implies localisation by Lemma 3 in [@vdBBDPG]. Since by Theorem \[the5\] $(v_{\Omega_n,V_n})$ has vanishing efficiency if it localises, the last assertion in Theorem \[the8\] follows. $\square$
Example \[exa1\] {#sec3}
=================
In this section we analyse a one parameter family of Schrödinger operators in one dimension, where $(\kappa,\delta)$-localisation for certain parameter choices occurs.
\[exa1\] If $\Omega=(-1, 1)$, and $$V_\nu(x) = \nu^4 1_{(-1, -\frac{1}{\nu})}(x) +
\nu^4 1_{(\frac{1}{\nu}, 1)}(x)
\, , \quad x \in (-1, 1)\, ,$$ where $\nu>1$ is a real parameter, then the torsion function $v_\nu := v_{\Omega, V_\nu}$ satisfies $$\label{fundamental estimate}
\frac{\int_{1/\nu}^1 v_\nu}{\int_{0}^{1/\nu} v_\nu}
\le \frac{6}{\nu}\, .$$ As a consequence, for any $0 < \kappa < 1,$ $0 < \delta < 1$ there exists $\nu_{\kappa, \delta} >1$ so that for any $\nu \ge \nu_{\kappa, \delta}$, $A_\nu := [-\frac{1}{\nu}, \frac{1}{\nu}]$ satisfies, $$\frac{|A_\nu|}{|\Omega|} \le \delta\, , \qquad
\frac{\int_{A_\nu} v_\nu}{\| v_\nu \|_1} \ge \kappa.$$
Since the potential $V_\nu$ is even, so is the torsion function $v_\nu$ and hence it suffices to determine $v_\nu$ on $[0, 1]$. On the interval $[ 0,\frac{1}{\nu}]$, the function $v_\nu$ is of the form $$v_{\nu, 1}(x) := - \frac{1}{2}x^2 + \gamma_\nu\, ,
\quad 0 \le x \le \frac{1}{\nu}\, ,$$ whereas on the interval $[\frac{1}{\nu}, 1]$, we make the following Ansatz $$v_{\nu, 2}(x) := \frac{1}{\nu^4}
- \alpha_\nu e^{\nu^2 x}
+ \beta_\nu e^{-\nu^2 x}\, ,
\quad \frac{1}{\nu} \le x \le 1\, .$$ It is straightforward to verify that $(-\Delta + V_{\nu}) v_{\nu, 1} = 1$ on $[0, \frac{1}{\nu}]$ and $(-\Delta + V_{\nu}) v_{\nu, 2} = 1$ on $[\frac{1}{\nu}, 1]$. The constants $\gamma_\nu,$ $\alpha_\nu$, and $\beta_\nu$ are determined by the boundary condition $v_{\nu, 2}(1) = 0$ and the matching conditions $$v_{\nu, 1}(\nu^{-1}) = v_{\nu, 2}(\nu^{-1})\, ,\quad
v_{\nu, 1}'(\nu^{-1}) = v_{\nu, 2}'(\nu^{-1})\, ,$$ where $'$ denotes the derivative with respect to the variable $x$. The boundary condition $v_{\nu, 2}(1) = 0$, or explicitly, $$\frac{1}{\nu^4} - \alpha_\nu e^{\nu^2} + \beta_\nu e^{-\nu^2} =0\, ,$$ yields $$\label{first formula beta nu}
\beta_\nu = \alpha_\nu e^{2\nu^2} -
\frac{1}{\nu^4} e^{\nu^2}\,$$ and the matching condition $v_{\nu, 1}'(\frac{1}{\nu}) =
v_{\nu, 2}'(\frac{1}{\nu})$ reads $$\frac{1}{\nu} =
\nu^2 \alpha_\nu e^{\nu} + \nu^2 \beta_\nu e^{-\nu} \, ,$$ leading to $$\alpha_\nu = \frac{1}{\nu^4 e^{\nu^2}}
\frac{1 + \nu e^{-\nu^2 +\nu}}{1 + e^{-2\nu^2 + 2\nu}}\,.$$ Substituting this value for $\alpha_\nu$ into the formula for $\beta_{\nu}$ one obtains $$\beta_\nu =
\frac{e^\nu}{\nu^3}
\frac{1 - \frac{1}{\nu} e^{-\nu^2 +\nu}}{1 + e^{-2\nu^2 + 2\nu}}\,.$$ It remains to determine $\gamma_\nu$ from the matching condition $v_{\nu, 1}(\frac{1}{\nu}) = v_{\nu, 2}(\frac{1}{\nu})$. One has $$- \frac{1}{2 \nu^2} + \gamma_\nu =
\frac{1}{\nu^4} - \alpha_\nu e^{\nu}
+ \beta_\nu e^{-\nu}\, ,$$ which gives the following formula for $\gamma_\nu$ $$\gamma_\nu = \frac{1}{2 \nu^2} + \frac{1}{\nu^4}
+ \frac{1}{\nu^3} \frac{1 - \frac{1}{\nu} e^{-\nu^2 +\nu}}
{1 + e^{-2\nu^2 + 2\nu}}
- \frac{1}{\nu^4 e^{\nu^2 - \nu}}
\frac{1 + \nu e^{-\nu^2 +\nu}}{1 + e^{-2\nu^2 + 2\nu}} \, .$$ Now let us turn to the estimate of the quotient, $\frac{\int_{1/\nu}^1 v_\nu}{\int_{0}^{1/\nu} v_\nu}$. We estimate the two integrals separately. First we derive a lower bound for $\int_{0}^{1/\nu} v_\nu$. To this end note that $$\int_{0}^{1/\nu} v_\nu =
\bigg( -\frac{1}{6}x^3 + \gamma_\nu x \bigg)\bigg|_0^{1/\nu}
= \frac{\gamma_\nu}{\nu} - \frac{1}{6\nu^3}$$ yielding $$\int_{0}^{1/\nu} v_\nu =
\frac{1}{3 \nu^3}
+ \frac{1}{\nu^4} \frac{1 - \frac{1}{\nu} e^{-\nu^2 +\nu}}
{1 + e^{-2\nu^2 + 2\nu}}
+ \frac{1}{\nu^5}\Big( 1 - \frac{1}{ e^{\nu^2 - \nu}}
\frac{1 + \nu e^{-\nu^2 +\nu}}{1 + e^{-2\nu^2 + 2\nu}} \Big).$$ Note that for any $\nu > 1$, one has $1 - \frac{1}{\nu} e^{-\nu^2 +\nu} > 0,$ and $$\frac{1}{ e^{\nu^2 - \nu}}
\frac{1 + \nu e^{-\nu^2 +\nu}}{1 + e^{-2\nu^2 + 2\nu}}
\le 1\, ,$$ implying that $$\label{estimate integral in denominator}
\int_{0}^{1/\nu} v_\nu \ge \frac{1}{3\nu^3} \, , \quad
\forall \nu > 1\, .$$ Next we derive an upper bound for $\int_{1/\nu}^1 v_\nu$. One computes $$\begin{aligned}
\label{t1}
\int_{1/\nu}^1 v_\nu &=
\frac{1}{\nu^4} (1 - \frac{1}{\nu})
- \frac{\alpha_\nu}{\nu^2} e^{\nu^2 x}|_{1/\nu}^1
- \frac{\beta_\nu}{\nu^2} e^{-\nu^2 x}|_{1/\nu}^1 \nonumber \\
& \le
\frac{1}{\nu^4}
+ \frac{\alpha_\nu}{\nu^2} e^{\nu}
+ \frac{\beta_\nu}{\nu^2} e^{-\nu} \nonumber \\
& \le \frac{1}{\nu^4} ( 1+ R_\nu ),\,\end{aligned}$$ where the remainder $R_\nu$ is given, and bounded, by $$\begin{aligned}
\label{t2}
R_\nu &= \frac{1}{\nu^2 e^{\nu^2 - \nu}}
\frac{1 + \nu e^{-\nu^2}}{1 + e^{-2\nu^2 + 2\nu}}
+ \frac{1}{\nu}
\frac{1 - \frac{1}{\nu} e^{-\nu^2 +\nu}}{1 + e^{-2\nu^2 + 2\nu}}\nonumber \\ &
=\frac{1+e^{-2\nu^2 + \nu}}{\nu\big(1+e^{-2\nu^2 + 2\nu}\big)}\nonumber \\ &\le \frac{1}{\nu},\qquad \forall\nu>1.\end{aligned}$$ By and , $$\label{estimate integral in nominator}
\int_{1/\nu}^1 v_\nu \le \frac{1}{\nu^4}+\frac{1}{\nu^5},\qquad \forall\nu\ge 1.$$ Combining and we obtain the claimed estimate , $$\frac{\int_{1/\nu}^1 v_\nu}{\int_{0}^{1/\nu} v_\nu}
\le \frac{3}{\nu}+\frac{3}{\nu^2}\le \frac{6}{\nu},\, \forall\nu\ge 1.$$ The remaining statements of the theorem now follow in a straightforward way from since $$\frac{\int_{A_\nu} v_\nu}{\| v_\nu \|_1} = 1 - \frac{\int_{1/\nu}^1 v_\nu}
{\int_{0}^{1/\nu} v_\nu + \int_{1/\nu}^1 v_\nu}\ge 1-\frac{\int_{1/\nu}^1 v_\nu}{\int_{0}^{1/\nu} v_\nu}.$$
Example \[exa2\] {#sec4}
=================
In this section we analyse localisation for a sequence of open, bounded sets $(\Omega_{\alpha,n}), n\in{\mathbb{N}}$ in ${\mathbb{R}}^2$, where $\Omega_{\alpha,n}$ is the disjoint union of $n$ rectangles of size $n^{-1}\times 1$, and $1$ rectangle of size $cn^{-\alpha}\times 1$. The constant $c$ is strictly positive, and $0<\alpha<1$.
\[exa2\] Let $$N_{\alpha,c}=\min\{n\in{\mathbb{N}}:n^{\alpha}>c,\, n^{1-\alpha}>c^{-1}\}.$$
- If $n\ge N_{\alpha,c}$, then $$\label{e16}
\frac{8}{45c^2(1+c)}\big(n^{2\alpha-2}+c^3n^{-\alpha}\big)\le\Phi(\Omega_{\alpha,n})\le \frac{4}{3c^2}\big(n^{2\alpha-2}+c^3n^{-\alpha}\big).$$
- If $\frac23<\alpha<1$, then $(v_{\Omega_{\alpha,n}})$ is not localising, $\kappa=0.$
- If $0<\alpha<\frac23$, then $(v_{\Omega_{\alpha,n}})$ is localising, $\kappa=1.$
- If $\alpha=\frac23$, then $(v_{\Omega_{\alpha,n}})$ is $\kappa_c$-localising with $$\label{e13}
\kappa_c=\frac{c^3}{1+c^3},$$ and the supremum defining $\kappa_c$ in is a maximum.
First we establish the following estimate for the torsion function of a rectangle in ${\mathbb{R}}^2$.
Let $R_{a,b}=(-a/2,a/2)\times(-b/2,b/2)$ be a rectangle with side lengths $a$ and $b$ respectively, and let $x=(x_1,x_2)\in R_{a,b}$. $$\label{e49a}
v_{R_{a,b}}(x_1,x_2)\le v_{(-a/2,a/2)}(x_1)=\frac{a^2-4x_1^2}{8},\qquad \forall (x_1,x_2)\in R_{a,b}.$$
By for $V=0$, separation of variables, and monotonicity and non-negativity of Dirichlet heat kernels we have $$\begin{aligned}
\label{e49b}
v_{R_{a,b}}(x_1,x_2)&=\int_0^{\infty}dt\,\int_{(-a/2,a/2)}dy_1\,p_{(-a/2,a/2)}(x_1,y_1;t)\nonumber \\ &
\hspace{20mm}\times\int_{(-b/2,b/2)}dy_2\,p_{(-b/2,b/2)}(x_2,y_2;t)\nonumber \\ &
\le\int_0^{\infty}dt\,\int_{(-a/2,a/2)}dy_1\,p_{(-a/2,a/2)}(x_1,y_1;t)\int_{{\mathbb{R}}}dy_2\,p_{{\mathbb{R}}}(x_2,y_2;t)\nonumber \\ &
=\int_0^{\infty}dt\,\int_{(-a/2,a/2)}dy_1\,p_{(-a/2,a/2)}(x_1,y_1;t)\nonumber \\ &
=v_{(-a/2,a/2)}(x_1)\nonumber \\&
=\frac{a^2-4x_1^2}{8},\end{aligned}$$ where we have used formula , $p_{{\mathbb{R}}}(x_2,y_2;t)=(4\pi t)^{-1/2}e^{-|x_2-y_2|^2/(4t)}$, identity , and the fact that the last equality in is the one-dimensional version of the torsion function for a ball $B_a\subset {\mathbb{R}}^m$ with radius $a$, centred at $0$. One verifies that $$\label{e49c}
v_{B_a}(x)=\frac{a^2-|x|^2}{2m},$$ satisfies for $\Omega=B_a$, [@PSZ].
[*Proof of Example* ]{} (i) We have $$\label{e49}
1\le |\Omega_{\alpha,n}|\le 1+c.$$ By , $$\|v_{\Omega_{\alpha,n}}\|_{\infty}\le \frac18\max\bigg\{\frac{1}{n^2},\frac{c^2}{n^{2\alpha}}\bigg\}.$$ Since $n\ge N_{\alpha,c}$ we obtain $$\label{e70a}
\|v_{\Omega_{\alpha,n}}\|_{\infty}\le \frac{c^2}{8n^{2\alpha}}.$$ On the other hand since $n\ge N_{\alpha,c}$, $\Omega_{\alpha,n}$ contains a ball with radius $\frac12 cn^{-\alpha}$. The maximum of the torsion function is, by domain monotonicity, bounded from below by the maximum for that ball. Since by with $m=2$, $\|v_{B_a}\|_{\infty}=\frac{a^2}{4}$ we have $$\label{e71}
\|v_{\Omega_{\alpha,n}}\|_{\infty}\ge \frac{c^2}{16n^{2\alpha}}.$$ It was shown in Proposition 3.1 in [@MvdBBV] that if $a\le b$, then $$\label{e72}
\frac{a^3b}{12}-\frac{11a^4}{180}\le \|v_{R_{a,b}}\|_1\le \frac{a^3b}{12}.$$ Since all rectangles in $\Omega_{\alpha,n}$ are disjoint $$\label{f1}
\|v_{\Omega_{\alpha,n}}\|_1\le \frac{1}{12n^2}+\frac{c^3n^{-3\alpha}}{12},$$ and $$\begin{aligned}
\label{f2}
\|v_{\Omega_{\alpha,n}}\|_1&\ge \frac{1}{12n^2}+\frac{c^3n^{-3\alpha}}{12}-\frac{11}{180n^3}-\frac{11c^4n^{-4\alpha}}{180}\nonumber \\ &
\ge \frac{1}{45}\big(n^{-2}+ c^3n^{-3\alpha}\big),\qquad n\ge N_{\alpha,c}.\end{aligned}$$ The upper bound in follows from the lower bound in , , and the upper bound in . The lower bound in follows the upper bound in , , and the lower bound in .
\(ii) Let $A_n$ be a measurable subset of $\Omega_{\alpha,n}$. Denote by $S_{\alpha,n}$ the rectangle of size $cn^{-\alpha}\times 1$. We have $$\begin{aligned}
\label{f3}
\int_{A_n}v_{\Omega_{\alpha,n}}&=\int_{A_n\cap S_{\alpha,n}}v_{\Omega_{\alpha,n}}+\int_{A_n\setminus S_{\alpha,n}}v_{\Omega_{\alpha,n}}\nonumber \\ &
\le\frac{c^3n^{-3\alpha}}{12}+|A_n|\max\{v_{\Omega_{\alpha,n}}:x\in \Omega_{\alpha,n}\setminus S_{\alpha,n}\}\nonumber \\ &
=\frac{c^3n^{-3\alpha}}{12}+\frac{|A_n|}{8n^2}.\end{aligned}$$ By , $\|v_{\Omega_{\alpha,n}}\|_1\ge \frac{1}{45n^{2}}$ so that $$\label{f4}
\frac{\int_{A_n}v_{\Omega_{\alpha,n}}}{\|v_{\Omega_{\alpha,n}}\|_1}\le\frac{15c^3n^{2-3\alpha}}{4}+\frac{45|A_n|}{8}.$$ Since $\alpha>\frac23$ we have that the right-hand side of tends to $0$ as $n\rightarrow\infty$ by the hypothesis on $|A_n|$. That hypothesis also shows that $$\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{|A_n|}{|\Omega_{\alpha,n}|} \le \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}|A_n|=0.$$ This proves that $\kappa=0$.
\(iii) We will show that for $n\rightarrow\infty$ all of the torsion mass localises at $S_{\alpha,n}$. This is equivalent to showing that $$\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\int_{\Omega_{\alpha,n}\setminus S_{\alpha,n}}v_{\Omega_{\alpha,n}}}{\int_{\Omega_{\alpha,n}}v_{\Omega_{\alpha,n}}}=0.$$ This follows from $$\int_{\Omega_{\alpha,n}\setminus S_{\alpha,n}}v_{\Omega_{\alpha,n}}\le \frac{1}{12n^2},$$ the estimate , $$\int_{\Omega_{\alpha,n}}v_{\Omega_{\alpha,n}}\ge \frac{c^3n^{-3\alpha}}{45},$$ and the hypotheses on $\alpha$ and on $n$. This proves assertion (iii).
\(iv) To obtain a lower bound for $\kappa$ in with $V=0,\, \Omega_n=\Omega_{\frac23,n}$ we choose $A_n=S_{\frac23,n}$. Then $ \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} | S_{\frac23,n} | = 0$, and it follows by that $$\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}n^2\int_{S_{\frac23,n}}v_{S_{\frac23,n}}=\frac{c^3}{12},$$ and $$\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}n^2\int_{\Omega_{\frac23,n}\setminus S_{\frac23,n}}v_{\Omega_{\frac23,n}}=\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}n^2\int_{\Omega_{\frac23,n}\setminus S_{\frac23,n}}v_{\Omega_{\frac23,n}\setminus S_{\frac23,n}}=\frac{1}{12}.$$ This implies $$\label{h8}
\kappa_c\ge \frac{c^3}{1+c^3}.$$ To prove the reverse inequality we let $(A_n)_n$ be an arbitrary sequence of measurable sets with $A_n\subset \Omega_{\frac23,n},\,n\in{\mathbb{N}}$ and $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}|A_n|=0$. Then, by , $$\label{h6}
\int_{A_n}v_{\Omega_{\frac23,n}}\le
\frac{1}{n^2}\bigg(\frac{c^3}{12}+\frac{|A_n|}{8}\bigg).$$ By the first inequality in , $$\label{h7}
\|v_{\Omega_{\frac23,n}}\|_1\ge \frac{n^{-2}}{12}+\frac{c^3n^{-2}}{12}-\frac{11n^{-3}}{180}-\frac{11c^4n^{-8/3}}{180}.$$ By and , $$\label{h9}
\limsup_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{\int_{A_n}v_{\Omega_{\frac23,n}}}{\|v_{\Omega_{\frac23,n}}\|_1}\le \frac{c^3}{1+c^3}.$$ Taking the supremum in the left-hand side of over all sequences $(A_n)$ in yields, $$ \kappa_c\le \frac{c^3}{1+c^3}.$$ This, together with gives . Furthermore, the supremum in is a maximum at $A_n=S_{\frac23,n}$. This maximiser is unique modulo sequences of measurable sets $B_n \subset A_n,\,n\in {\mathbb{N}}$ with measure $|B_n|=0,\,n\in {\mathbb{N}}$, and sequences of measurable sets $C_n \subset \Omega_{\frac23,n}\setminus A_n,\,n\in {\mathbb{N}}$, with $\lim_{n\rightarrow 0}|C_n|=0$. This completes the proof of assertion (iv). $\square$
Proof of Theorem \[the7\] {#sec5}
==========================
[*Proof of Theorem .*]{} The proof follows a method from [@HLP], which can be summarised as follows: construct a capacitary measure $\mu$ so that the efficiency of the eigenfunction of the first eigenvalue of $- \Delta + \mu$ almost equals $1$ and then approximate the capacitary measure in the sense of $\gamma$-convergence by a sequence of domains. [ Such an]{} approximation is possible in view of the Dal Maso-Mosco density result. (It could possibly be done locally using a Cioranescu-Murat periodic structure.) We refer the reader to [@BB05 Chapter 4] for the notions of $\gamma$-convergence, capacitary measures and approximation by sequences of domains.
Let ${\overline}B_r$ denote the closure of $B_r$. For any $0 < \varepsilon < 1$, we consider the Dirichlet-Neumann eigenvalue problem on the annulus $A_{\varepsilon}=B_1{\setminus}{\overline}B_{1-{\varepsilon}}$. Denote by $\lambda_{\varepsilon}$ the first eigenvalue and by $u_{\varepsilon}$ a corresponding eigenfunction,
$$\begin{cases}
-\Delta u_{\varepsilon}=\lambda_{\varepsilon}u_{\varepsilon},&\text{in }A_{\varepsilon},\\
{ u_{\varepsilon}}=0,&\text{on }\partial B_{1},\\
\frac{\partial { u_{\varepsilon}}}{\partial \nu}= 0,&\text{on }\partial B_{1-{\varepsilon}}.
\end{cases}$$
where $\nu$ denotes the inward-pointing normal on the sphere $\partial B_{1-{\varepsilon}}$. One can show that ${\lambda}_{\varepsilon}$ is simple and strictly positive and that $u_{\varepsilon}$ is radially symmetric and has a constant sign, say positive. In particular, the restriction of $u_{\varepsilon}$ to $\partial B_{1-{\varepsilon}}$ equals a positive constant, $c_{\varepsilon}> 0$. We continuously extend $u_{\varepsilon}$ inside $B_{1-{\varepsilon}}$ by $c_{\varepsilon}$ and denote the resulting function, defined on ${\overline}B_1$, by $v_{\varepsilon}$.
Since the normal derivatives of $v_{\varepsilon}$ on both sides of $\partial B_{1-{\varepsilon}}$ vanish, $\Delta v_{\varepsilon}$ is an $L^2$-function. More precisely, one has $$-\Delta v_{\varepsilon}= {\lambda}_{\varepsilon}u_{\varepsilon}1_{A_{\varepsilon}}, \quad \mbox {in } {\mathcal D}'(B_1),$$ where ${\mathcal D}'(B_1)$ denotes the space of distributions on $B_1$. By adding on both sides the $L^2$ function $ {\lambda}_{\varepsilon}v_{\varepsilon}1_{{\overline}B_{1-{\varepsilon}}}$ we get\
$$-\Delta v_{\varepsilon}+ {\lambda}_{\varepsilon}v_{\varepsilon}1_{{\overline}B_{1-{\varepsilon}}}= {\lambda}_{\varepsilon}v_{\varepsilon},\quad \mbox {in } {\mathcal D}'(B_1).$$ We view $\mu := {\lambda}_{\varepsilon}1_{{\overline}B_{1-{\varepsilon}}}$ as a capacitary measure on $B_1$. Then formally, we get $$-\Delta v_{\varepsilon}+ \mu v_{\varepsilon}= {\lambda}_{\varepsilon}v_{\varepsilon},\quad \mbox {in } {\mathcal D}'(B_1).$$ Combined with the fact that $v_{\varepsilon}>0$, this means that ${\lambda}_{\varepsilon}$ is the first Dirichlet eigenvalue of $- \Delta + \mu$. We assume from now on that $v_{\varepsilon}$ is normalized by $\|v_{\varepsilon}\|_{L^2(B_1)}=1$. Since the measure $\mu$ is finite with support in $B_1$, the first eigenvalue $\lambda_{\varepsilon}$ is simple.
In view of the Dal Maso-Mosco density result [@DMM87], there exists a sequence ${\Omega}_n{\subseteq}B_1$, $n \ge 1$, such that ${\Omega}_n $ $\gamma$-converges to $\mu$. We can assume that the boundary $\partial {\Omega}_n$ of ${\Omega}_n$ is smooth. Furthermore, we can also assume that ${\Omega}_n$ is connected. For otherwise we keep from ${\Omega}_n$ only a connected component $\Omega_n'$ with the largest $L^1-$norm of its torsion function among all the connected components of $\Omega_n$. Then $ \Omega_n \setminus \Omega_n'$ $\gamma$-converges to the empty set as $n \to \infty$ and the removal of $ \Omega_n \setminus \Omega_n'$ from $\Omega_n$ does not affect the first Dirichlet eigenvalue of $-\Delta$ on $\Omega_n$, while $|\Omega_n'| \le |\Omega_n|$. It is possible to explicitly construct such a sequence $(\Omega_n)$ in the spirit of Cioranescu-Murat [@CM], but such a construction is not needed for the rest of the proof. The only fact we need to keep in mind is that ${\Omega}_n {\subseteq}B_1$, so that $|{\Omega}_n| \le |B_1|$. Denote by $\lambda_1(\Omega_n)$ the first Dirichlet eigenvalue of $-\Delta$ on $\Omega_n$ and by $u_n$ the $L^2-$normalized, positive eigenfunction corresponding to $\lambda_1(\Omega_n)$. We extend $u_n$ to $ B_1$ by setting it to $0$ on $B_1 \setminus {\overline}\Omega_n$ and by a slight abuse of notation, denote this extension again by $u_n$. The $\gamma$-convergence of $(\Omega_n)$, together with the compact embedding of $H^1_0(B_1)$ in $L^1(B_1)$, imply that (i) ${\lambda}_1({\Omega}_n) \rightarrow {\lambda}_{\varepsilon}$, and (ii) $u_n\rightharpoonup v_{\varepsilon}$ weakly in $H^1_0(B_1)$ and strongly in $L^1(B_1)$. Assuming that $$\label{L infty}
\lim_{n \to \infty }\|u_n\|_\infty = \|v_{\varepsilon}\|_\infty.$$ we get $$\liminf_{n \rightarrow +\infty} \frac{\int_{{\Omega}_n} u_n dx}{\|u_n\|_\infty |{\Omega}_n|} \ge \frac{\int_{B_1} v_{\varepsilon}dx}{\|v_{\varepsilon}\|_\infty |B_1|}.$$ Since the right-hand side is arbitrarily close to $1$ when ${\varepsilon}\downarrow 0$, the proof of Theorem \[the7\] is then completed by a diagonal selection procedure.
It remains to show . This kind of assertion is known to be true in a general setup. In essence it is a consequence of the subharmonicity of the eigenfunctions $u_n$, $n \ge 1$. (For a similar result for the torsion function see [@HLP Theorem 2.2].) For the sake of completeness, we give below a proof. It slightly differs from the one in [@HLP Theorem 2.2].
First note that since $u_n \to v_{\varepsilon}$ strongly in $L^1$, it follows that $$\liminf _{n \to +\infty} \|u_n\|_\infty \ge \|v_{\varepsilon}\|_\infty .$$ To prove that $ \limsup _{n \to +\infty} \|u_n\|_\infty \le \|v_{\varepsilon}\|_\infty $ we argue as follows. Being convergent, the sequence $({\lambda}_1(\Omega_n))$ is bounded, and so is $\| u_n \|_\infty$. Choose $M>0$ so that for any $n \in {\mathbb{N}}$ $${\lambda}_1(\Omega_n) u_n(x) \le M, \quad \forall \ x \in B_1,$$ and therefore $$-\Delta u_n(x) \le M , \qquad \forall \ x \in B_1 .$$ Let $x_n \in B_1$ be a maximum point for $u_n$. By taking, if necessary, a subsequence we may assume that $x_n \to x^*$. Furthermore, $$-\Delta u_n \le M= M \Delta \frac{|x-x_n|^2}{2m}, \quad \mbox {in } {\mathcal D}'( {\mathbb{R}}^m),$$ or $$-\Delta \Big (u_n + M \frac{|x-x_n|^2}{2m}\Big)\le 0, \quad \mbox {in } {\mathcal D}'( {\mathbb{R}}^m).$$ By the subharmonicity of the function $x \mapsto u_n(x) + M \frac{|x-x_n|^2}{2m}$ around $x_n$, it then follows that for $\delta >0$ sufficiently small, $$\|u_n \|_\infty = u_n(x_n) \le \frac{\int _{B(x_n; \delta)} \big( u_n(x) + M \frac{|x-x_n|^2}{2m}\big) }{|B(x_n; \delta)|}.$$ Taking the limit $n \to +\infty$ we obtain $$\limsup _{n \to +\infty} \|u_n\|_\infty \le \frac{\int _{B(x^*; \delta)}\Big(v_{\varepsilon}(x) + M \frac{|x-x^*|^2}{2m}\Big)}{|B(x^*;\delta)|},$$ or $$\limsup _{n \to +\infty} \|u_n\|_\infty \le \frac{\|v_{\varepsilon}\|_\infty |B(x^*; \delta)| + M \frac{\delta^2}{2m} |B(x^*; \delta)|}{|B(x^*; \delta)|}
= \|v_{\varepsilon}\|_\infty + M \frac{\delta^2}{2m}.$$ Letting $\delta \downarrow 0$, completes the proof. $\square$
\[rem0\] If $\Omega$ is an open connected subset of ${\mathbb{R}}^m$ with $m \ge 2$ and $0<|\Omega|<\infty$, then
1. $$\label{p1}
\Phi(\Omega)\ge \frac{E(\Omega)}{1+k_m\lambda_1(\Omega)^{m/4}|\Omega|^{1/2}\big(1-E(\Omega)\big)^{1/2}},\hspace{14mm} m=2,3,$$
2. $$\label{p2}
\Phi(\Omega)\ge \frac{E(\Omega)}{1+k_m\lambda_1(\Omega)|\Omega|^{2/m}\big(1-E(\Omega)\big)^{1/(m-1)}},\qquad m\ge 4,$$
where $$\label{p0}
k_m=
\begin{cases}
2(8\pi)^{-m/4}\Gamma((4-m)/4),\hspace {38mm} m=2,3,\\
\pi^{-1}(m-2)^{-1}m^{-1/(m-1)}\big(\Gamma((m+2)/2)\big)^{2/m},\qquad m\ge 4.
\end{cases}$$
Putting $V=0$ in one obtains by using , $$\begin{aligned}
\label{p3}
v_{\Omega}(x)&\ge \int_{\Omega} dy \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^+} dt\, p_{\Omega}(x,y;t)\frac{\varphi_{1,\Omega}(y)}{\|\varphi_{1, \Omega}\|_{\infty}}\nonumber \\ &
=\lambda_{1}(\Omega)^{-1}\frac{\varphi_{1,\Omega}(x)}{\|\varphi_{1, \Omega}\|_{\infty}}.\end{aligned}$$ Integrating both sides of yields, $$\label{p4}
\|v_{\Omega}\|_1\ge \lambda_{1}(\Omega)^{-1}\frac{\|\varphi_{1,\Omega}\|_1}{\|\varphi_{1, \Omega}\|_{\infty}}.$$ To obtain the stated lower bound for $\Phi(\Omega)$ it remains to find an upper bound for $\|v_{\Omega}\|_{\infty}$.
First consider case (i). By , the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, and the heat semigroup property, one sees that $$\begin{aligned}
\label{p5}
v_{\Omega}(x)-\lambda_{1}&(\Omega)^{-1}\frac{\varphi_{1,\Omega}(x)}{\|\varphi_{1, \Omega}\|_{\infty}}
=\int_{\Omega} dy \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^+} dt\, p_{\Omega}(x,y;t)\bigg(1-\frac{\varphi_{1,\Omega}(y)}{\|\varphi_{1, \Omega}\|_{\infty}}\bigg)\nonumber \\ &
\le \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^+} dt\, \bigg(\int_{\Omega} dy(p_{\Omega}(x,y;t))^2\bigg)^{1/2}\bigg(\int_{\Omega} dy\bigg(1-\frac{\varphi_{1,\Omega}(y)}{\|\varphi_{1, \Omega}\|_{\infty}}\bigg)\bigg)^{1/2}\nonumber \\ &
=|\Omega|^{1/2}\int_{{\mathbb{R}}^+} dt\,p_{\Omega}(x,x;2t)^{1/2}\big(1-E(\Omega)\big)^{1/2}.\end{aligned}$$ Choosing $\beta=\frac12$ in gives by domain monotonicity of the Dirichlet heat kernel, and $$\label{p6}
p_{\Omega}(x,x;2t)\le e^{-t\lambda_1(\Omega)}(4\pi t)^{-m/2}.$$ Substitution of into the right-hand side of , evaluating the resulting integral with respect to $t$, and taking the supremum over all $x\in\Omega$ gives $$\label{p7}
\|v_{\Omega}\|_{\infty}-\lambda_{1}(\Omega)^{-1}\le 2(8\pi)^{-m/4}|\Omega|^{1/2}\Gamma((4-m)/4)\lambda_1(\Omega)^{-1 + m/4}\big(1-E(\Omega)\big)^{1/2}.$$ Inequality follows from , with the values for $k_2$ and $k_3$ given in .
Next consider case (ii). By the first equality in we have by domain monotonicity of the Dirichlet heat kernel $$\begin{aligned}
v_{\Omega}(x)-\lambda_{1}&(\Omega)^{-1}\frac{\varphi_{1,\Omega}(x)}{\|\varphi_{1, \Omega}\|_{\infty}}
\le \int_{\Omega} dy \int_{{\mathbb{R}}^+} dt\, p_{{\mathbb{R}}^m}(x,y;t)\bigg(1-\frac{\varphi_{1,\Omega}(y)}{\|\varphi_{1, \Omega}\|_{\infty}}\bigg) \nonumber \\ &
=c_m\int_{\Omega} dy |x-y|^{2-m}\bigg(1-\frac{\varphi_{1,\Omega}(y)}{\|\varphi_{1, \Omega}\|_{\infty}}\bigg),\end{aligned}$$ where $$c_m=\frac{\Gamma((m-2)/2)}{4\pi^{m/2}}.$$ By Hölder’s inequality with exponents $p=\frac{m-1}{m-2}$ and $q=m-1$ we have $$\begin{aligned}
v_{\Omega}(x)-&\lambda_{1}(\Omega)^{-1}\frac{\varphi_{1,\Omega}(x)}{\|\varphi_{1,\Omega}\|_{\infty}}\nonumber \\ &
\le c_m\bigg(\int_{\Omega}\frac{dy}{|x-y|^{m-1}}\bigg)^{(m-2)/(m-1)}\bigg( \int_\Omega dy \big(1-\frac{\varphi_{1,\Omega}(y)}{\|\varphi_{1, \Omega}\|_{\infty}} )\bigg)^{1/(m-1)}\nonumber \\ &
\le c_m\bigg(\int_{\Omega^*}\frac{dy}{|y|^{m-1}}\bigg)^{(m-2)/(m-1)}\bigg(\int_\Omega dy \big(1-\frac{\varphi_{1,\Omega}(y)}{\|\varphi_{1, \Omega}\|_{\infty}} \big)\bigg)^{1/(m-1)}\nonumber \\ &
=c_m \big(m\omega_m R^*\big)^{(m-2)/(m-1)}|\Omega|^{1/(m-1)}\big(1-E(\Omega)\big)^{1/(m-1)},\end{aligned}$$ where we have used Schwarz symmetrisation with $\Omega^*=B_{R^*}$, and $\omega_m (R^*)^m=|\Omega|.$
Taking the supremum over all $x\in \Omega$ and using the formulae for $c_m$ and $R^*$ gives, $$\begin{aligned}
\|v_{\Omega}\|_{\infty}\le\lambda_{1}(\Omega)^{-1}&+\pi^{-1}(m-2)^{-1}m^{-1/(m-1)}\big(\Gamma((m+2)/2)\big)^{2/m}\nonumber \\ &\times|\Omega|^{2/m}\big(1-E(\Omega)\big)^{1/(m-1)}.\end{aligned}$$ This, together with , implies the assertion for $m\ge 4$.
We see from the proof of Remark \[rem0\](ii) that the case $m=3$ could also have been included. However, that would have given $\lambda_1(\Omega)|\Omega|^{2/3}$ in the denominator. By Theorem \[the9\] (iii) we have, for $m=3$, that $\lambda_1(\Omega)|\Omega|^{2/3}\gg1$ if $E(\Omega)$ is close to $1$. Then $\lambda_1(\Omega)^{3/4}|\Omega|^{1/2}\ll\lambda_1(\Omega)|\Omega|^{2/3},$ and so gives a better bound in that case. However, bounds and do not imply that if $\Phi(\Omega)$ is close to $1$ then $E(\Omega)$ is close to $1$ since, by Theorem \[the9\] (iii) $\lambda_1(\Omega)|\Omega|^{2/m}$, becomes large.
Proof of Theorem \[the9\] {#sec6}
==========================
[*Proof of Theorem* ]{}. By re-scaling both $u$ and $\Omega$, $$\label{p24}
\frac{u(tx)}{\|u\|_{\infty}}, \qquad x \in t^{-1} \Omega ,$$ it suffices to consider the case where $\|u\|_{\infty}=1$, and $|\Omega|=\omega_m$. Inequality then reads $$\label{p25}
\bigg( 1 - \fint_{\Omega}u\bigg)\int_{\Omega}|\nabla u|^2\ge \frac{4m^2}{(m+2)^2}\omega_m,$$ with $|\Omega|=\omega_m, \, \|u\|_\infty = 1,$ and $\fint_{\Omega}u\ge \frac{2}{m+2}.$ Note that replacing $u$ by its positive part $u^{+}$ decreases the left-hand side of , and furthermore, $u^{+}\le 1,\,\fint_{\Omega} u^+ \ge \frac{2}{m+2}$. So it suffices to prove that for any $m \ge 2,$ $$(1-\theta) F(\theta) \ge \frac{4m^2}{(m+2)^2}\omega_m \, , \qquad \forall \, \theta\in [2/(m+2),1),$$ where $$F(\theta):= \inf\big\{\int_{\Omega}|\nabla u|^2: \, u\in H_0^{1}(\Omega), 0 \le u \le 1,\fint_{\Omega}u=\theta \big\} \, .$$
We make some preliminary observations. By Schwarz rearrangement we may consider the infimum in the definition of $F$ over the collection $H_0^{*1}(B_1)$ of all radially symmetric, decreasing functions $u$ in $H_0^1(B_1)$ since this rearrangement decreases the energy and leaves the other constraints unchanged. So, $$F(\theta) \ge F^*(\theta), \quad 2/(m+2) \le \theta < 1,$$ where $$\label{minimization 2}
F^*(\theta) = \inf\big\{\int_{B_1}|\nabla u|^2 : \, u \in H_0^{*1}(B_1), 0 \le u \le 1,\,\fint_{B_1}u=\theta \big\}.$$ First note that $$\inf\big\{\int_{B_1}|\nabla u|^2 : \, u \in H_0^{*1}(B_1), \, \fint_{B_1}u=\theta \big\},$$ admits a minimiser. By the Langrange multiplier theorem, it is given by the radially symmetric, decreasing solution of $$- \Delta u = c\, , \qquad u(1) = 0\, , \qquad \fint_{B_1} u = \theta,$$ where here, and in the sequel, by a slight abuse of notation, we write $u(r)$ instead of $u(x)$. By a straightforward computation one sees that for any $2/(m+2) \le \theta < 1$ $$\label{unconstrained}
u(r) = 2^{-1}(m+2)\theta(1 - r^2).$$ In particular, $\|u \|_\infty = u(0) = c \ge 1$. Note that we could have written $0\le u,\, \| u\|_\infty =1$ instead of $0\le u\le 1$ in the right-hand side of .
For any $2/(m+2) \le \theta <1,$ $ F^*(\theta)$ admits a minimiser. Since the Dirichlet energy is strictly convex, it is unique, and we denote it by $u_\theta$. Let $$f(\theta) = (1- \theta)F^*(\theta).$$ Since $F(\theta) \ge F^*(\theta)$, it suffices to show that $$\label{to be proved}
f(\theta) \ge \frac{4m^2}{(m+2)^2}\omega_m\, , \qquad \ \forall \theta \in [2/(m+2) , 1)\, .$$ If $\theta = \frac{2}{m+2}$, then by , $u_{2/(m+2)} (r) = 1- r^2$. Hence $$\label{minimum}
f(2/(m+2)) = \Big(1- \frac{2}{m+2}\Big) \int_{B_1} (-2r)^2 mr^{m-1} \omega_m dr = \frac{ 4m^2}{(m+2)^2} \omega_m.$$ Hence is satisfied for $\theta = \frac{2}{m+2}$.
The remaining part of the proof consists of four parts. In part (a) we show that holds for any $m\ge 2$ and $\theta\in [\frac{2}{m+2},\theta_m^*]$ where $$\label{p27}
\theta_m^* :=\frac{m+\big(m^2+8m\big)^{1/2}}{2(m+2)}.$$ We note that $2/(m+2) < 2/3 < \theta_m^* < 1$ for any $m \ge 2$. In part (b) we prove that holds for any $m\ge 4$ and $\theta\in [\theta_m^*,1)$. In part (c) we show that holds for $m=2,3$, using the Euler-Lagrange equation of a variational problem, related to an obstacle problem. See below. Finally, in part (d) we verify that [*equality*]{} in holds if and only if $\Omega$ is a ball and $u$ is a multiple of the torsion function for that ball. This completes the proof of Theorem \[the9\] (i).
\(a) Assume that $\frac{2}{m+2} \le \theta \le \theta_m^*.$ In a first step we prove that $\theta\mapsto f(\theta)$ is increasing on $[\frac{2}{m+2},\frac23]$ which by implies that holds for $\theta$ in the latter interval. Given $\frac{2}{m+2} < \theta < 1$, choose any $\varepsilon>0$ with the property $$\frac{\theta}{1+\varepsilon}>\frac{2}{m+2}.$$ Let $\overline{u}_\theta$ be the minimiser of the obstacle problem $$\inf\{\int_{B_1}|\nabla u|^2: \, \, u\in H_0^{*1}(B_1), \, 0\le u \le 1+\varepsilon, \, \fint_{B_1} u=\theta\}.$$ Then, by inclusion of the class of admissible test functions, $$\label{p52}
\int_{B_1}|\nabla\overline {u}_\theta|^2\le \int_{B_1}|\nabla u_{\theta}|^2,$$ where $u_{\theta}$ is the minimiser of $F^*(\theta)$. Furthermore $(1+\varepsilon)^{-1}\overline{u}_\theta$ is the minimizer $u_{\theta/(1+\varepsilon)}$ for $F^*( \theta/(1 + \varepsilon))$, since $0 \le (1+\varepsilon)^{-1}\overline{u}_\theta \le 1$, and $\fint_{B_1}\frac{\overline{u}_\theta}{1+\varepsilon}=\frac{\theta}{1+\varepsilon}$. We wish to prove that $$\label{p53}
f(\theta/(1 + \varepsilon)) = \Big(1- \frac{\theta}{ 1 + \varepsilon}\Big) \int_{B_1}\frac{|\nabla \overline{ u}_\theta |}{ (1 + \varepsilon)^2} \le
(1-\theta) \int_{B_1}|\nabla u_{\theta}|^2 = f(\theta),$$ By , inequality holds if $$\frac{1}{(1+\varepsilon)^2}\bigg(1-\frac{\theta}{1+\varepsilon}\bigg)\le(1-\theta),$$ or, after simplifying, $$\label{p56}
1\le (3+3\varepsilon +\varepsilon^2)(1-\theta).$$ The latter inequality clearly holds for any $\varepsilon \ge 0$ if $ \frac{2}{m+2} \le \theta\le \frac23$. Thus we have proved that $f(\theta)$ is increasing on the interval $[\frac{2}{m+2},\frac23]$.
By the same argument we now prove that $f(\theta) \ge f(2/(m+2))= \frac{ 4m^2}{(m+2)^2}\omega_m $ also for $\theta \in ( \frac23, \theta_m^*]$. (However, we do not prove that $f$ is increasing in the interval $( \frac23, \theta_m^*]$.) Given $\theta \in ( \frac23, \theta_m^*]$, we want to find $\varepsilon>0$ so that $$\label{p57}
\frac{2}{m+2} \le \frac{\theta}{1+\varepsilon}\le \frac 23 ,\qquad 1\le \big( 3+3\varepsilon+\varepsilon^2\big) (1-\theta).$$ By and , one then infers that $$f(\theta) \ge f(\theta/(1+\varepsilon)) \ge f(2/(m+2)).$$ To find $\varepsilon > 0$ so that holds, we solve $$\label{eq for epsilon}
1= 3(1-\theta)+3\varepsilon(1-\theta)+\varepsilon^2(1-\theta)$$ for $\varepsilon$ and verify that for the given range of $\theta,$ one has $\frac{2}{m+2} \le \frac{\theta}{1+\varepsilon}\le \frac 23$. The positive solution of is given by $$\varepsilon=-\frac32+ \frac12\bigg(\frac{1+3\theta}{1-\theta}\bigg)^{1/2}>0.$$ The requirement $ \frac{2}{m+2} \le \frac{\theta}{1+\varepsilon}$ yields, by a direct computation, $$\theta\le \theta_m^*.$$ Using $\theta \ge \frac 23$, one sees that $ \frac{\theta}{1+\varepsilon} \le \frac 23$.
\(b) In this part we assume that $m \ge 4$ and $\theta_m^* \le \theta < 1.$ Let $ 0 \le r_0 < 1$ and let $u \in H_0^{*1}(B_1)$ with $0 \le u \le 1$ and $\theta = \fint_{B_1} u.$ Since $u$ is radially symmetric and decreasing, $$\omega_m^{-1}\int_{B_1\setminus\overline{B}_{r_0}}u \le \, \omega_m^{-1}u(r_0) \, |B_1\setminus\overline{B}_{r_0}|=u(r_0)(1-r_0^m).$$ Since, $0 \le u \le 1$ and $\theta = \fint_{B_1} u,$ we conclude that $$ r_0^m\ge \omega_m^{-1}\int_{B_{r_0}}u = \omega_m^{-1}\int_{B_1}u - \omega_m^{-1}\int_{B_1 \setminus {\overline}B_{r_0}}u
\ge \theta-u(r_0)(1-r_0^m).$$ It then follows that $$\label{p31}
u(r_0)\ge \eta_m(\theta, r_0) := \frac{ \theta-r_0^m}{1-r_0^m} \ge 0 \, , \qquad \forall \, r_0\in [0,\theta^{1/m}].$$ By inclusion of the admissible test functions one has $$\begin{aligned}
\label{p32}
f(\theta)\ge (1-\theta)\inf\big\{\int_{B_1}|\nabla u|^2 : \, u \in H_0^{*1}(B_1), \, u(r_0)\ge \eta_m(\theta, r_0) \big\}.\end{aligned}$$ The infimum in the right-hand side of is attained and its minimiser $u^*$ is given by $$u^*(r)=
\begin{cases}
\eta_m(\theta, r_0),\hspace {18mm} 0\le r\le r_0,\\
\frac{1-r^{2-m}}{1-r_0^{2-m}}\eta_m(\theta, r_0),\qquad r_0\le r\le 1.
\end{cases}$$ A straightforward calculation gives $$\label{p34}
\int_{B_1}|\nabla u^*|^2=m(m-2)\omega_m\frac{\eta_m^2(\theta, r_0)}{r_0^{2-m}-1}\, .$$ We now choose $$\label{p35}
r_0=\theta^{c/m},$$ where $c\ge 1$ is to be determined later. This choice satisfies the constraint $0 \le r_0 \le \theta^{1/m}$ in . By and , $$\label{p36}
f(\theta)\ge m(m-2)\omega_m\bigg(\frac{\theta-\theta^c}{1-\theta^c}\bigg)^2\frac{1-\theta}{\theta^{c(2-m)/m}-1}.$$ By L’Hôpital’s rule, $$\label{p371}
\liminf_{\theta\uparrow 1}f(\theta) \, \ge \, m^2 \omega_m\frac{(c-1)^2}{c^3}.$$ The right-hand side of is maximised for $c=3$. This choice yields, $$\liminf_{\theta\uparrow 1}f(\theta)\ge \frac{4m^2}{27} \omega_m.$$ Note that $$\label{p40}
\frac{4m^2}{27} \omega_m \ge \frac{4m^2}{(m+2)^2}\omega_m.$$ if and only if $m\ge 4$. This is why the proof of for $m=2,3$ has been deferred to part (c). By we have for $c=3$, $$\begin{aligned}
\label{p38}
f(\theta)&\ge m(m-2)\omega_m\bigg(\frac{\theta(1+\theta)}{1+\theta+\theta^2}\bigg)^2\frac{1-\theta}{\theta^{3(2-m)/m}-1}\nonumber \\ &
\ge m(m-2)\omega_m\bigg(\frac{\theta(1+\theta)}{1+\theta+\theta^2}\bigg)^2\frac{1-\theta}{\theta^{-3}-1}\nonumber \\ &
=m(m-2)\omega_m\frac{\theta^5(1+\theta)^2}{(1+\theta+\theta^2)^3}.\end{aligned}$$
To prove for $\theta\in [\theta_m^*,1)$ and $m \ge 4$, it suffices, by , to show that $$\label{p41}
\frac{\theta^5(1+\theta)^2}{(1+\theta+\theta^2)^3}\ge \frac{4m}{(m-2)(m+2)^2},\qquad \forall \, \theta\in [\theta_m^*,1).$$ First observe that the left-hand side of is a product of non-negative increasing functions, $\theta\mapsto\frac{\theta(1+\theta)}{1+\theta+\theta^2}$ and $\theta\mapsto\frac{\theta^3}{1+\theta+\theta^2}$, and so is increasing. So if holds for $\theta=\theta_m^*$ then it holds on the interval $[\theta_m^*,1)$. Furthermore by , $$\theta_m^*=1-\frac{8}{(m+2)(m+4+(m^2+ 8m)^{1/2})}.$$ Hence $(\theta_m^*)_m$ is a strictly increasing sequence. Since the right-hand side of is decreasing in $m$ we conclude that if holds for $m=m_1$ then it holds for all $m\ge m_1$. It is straightforward to verify $$\theta_6^*> \frac{15}{16},$$ and that holds for $\theta=\frac{15}{16}$, and $m=6$. Hence it follows that holds for all $\theta \in [\theta_m^*, 1)$ with $m\ge 6$.
To complete the proof of part (b) it remains to treat the cases $m=4$ and $m=5$. We first consider the case $m=4$. One computes $$\theta_4^*=\frac{1+\sqrt 3}{3},$$ and by the first inequality in , one gets $$\label{p45}
f(\theta)\ge 8\omega_4\bigg(\frac{\theta(1+\theta)}{1+\theta+\theta^2}\bigg)^2\bigg(\frac{1-\theta}{\theta^{-3/2}-1}\bigg).$$ Since both $\theta\mapsto \frac{\theta(1+\theta)}{1+\theta+\theta^2}$ and $\theta\mapsto \frac{1-\theta}{\theta^{-3/2}-1}$ are non-negative increasing functions on the interval $[0, 1)$ the right-hand side of is increasing in $\theta$. Note that the right-hand side of equals $16\omega_4/9$. Hence by it suffices to verify that $$\label{p46}
\bigg(\frac{\theta^*_4(1+\theta^*_4)}{1+\theta^*_4+\theta{^*_4}^2}\bigg)^2\bigg(\frac{1-\theta^*_4}{\theta{^*_4}^{-3/2}-1}\bigg)\ge \frac{2}{9}.$$ Numerical evaluation of the left-hand side of yields $$\bigg(\frac{\theta^*_4(1+\theta^*_4)}{1+\theta^*_4+\theta{^*_4}^2}\bigg)^2\bigg(\frac{1-\theta^*_4}{\theta{^*_4}^{-3/2}-1}\bigg)\ge .238,$$ which implies .
Finally we consider the case $m=5$. One computes that $$\label{p48}
\theta_5^*\ge \frac{13}{14},$$ and by the first inequality in , $$f(\theta)\ge 15\omega_5\bigg(\frac{\theta(1+\theta)}{1+\theta+\theta^2}\bigg)^2\frac{1-\theta}{\theta^{-9/5}-1}.$$ Since both $\theta\mapsto \frac{\theta(1+\theta)}{1+\theta+\theta^2}$ and $\theta\mapsto \frac{1-\theta}{\theta^{-9/5}-1}$ are non-negative increasing functions on the interval $[0,1)$, so is the right-hand side of and it remains, by , to verify that $$\label{p49}
\bigg(\frac{\theta^*_5(1+\theta^*_5)}{1+\theta^*_5+\theta{^*_5}^2}\bigg)^2\bigg(\frac{1-\theta^*_5}{\theta{^*_5}^{-9/5}-1}\bigg)\ge \frac{20}{147}.$$ By , the left-hand side of is bounded from below by $.206$ while the right hand side of is bounded from above by $.137$. This completes the proof of part (b).
\(c) In this part we treat the cases $m=2$ and $m=3$. We begin with some preliminary considerations. We note that the minimisation problem is related to a volume constraint obstacle problem in $B_1$: we claim that there exist $c>0$ and $0 \le l < 1$, depending on $\theta$, so that $u_\theta$ satisfies the following system of equations, $$\label{np1}
\begin{cases}
-\Delta u=c,&\text{in }B_1\setminus {\overline}B_l,\\
u=1,&\text{on } {\overline}B_l,\\
u= 0,&\text{on }\partial B_1,\\
\frac {\partial u}{\partial \nu} =0, &\text{on }\partial B_l,
\end{cases}$$ where $\nu$ denotes the inward pointing normal on the sphere $\partial B_l$. Indeed, since $u_\theta$ is radially symmetric, decreasing and since $u_\theta(0) = 1$ (cf. ) and $u_\theta(1) = 0$, there exists a maximal number $0 \le l \equiv l(\theta) < 1$ so that $u_\theta (r) =1$ for $0 \le r \le l$. By the Lagrange multiplier theorem, there exists a constant $c >0$ so that $-\Delta u_\theta =c$ on $B_1 {\setminus}{\overline}B_l$ in the sense of distributions. It then follows from [@GE Theorem 2] that $u_\theta$ is $C^{1, \alpha}$ on ${\overline}B_1$ which implies that $\frac {\partial u_\theta}{\partial \nu} =0 $ on $\partial B_l$. These observations establish . Note that both $c$ and $l$ are uniquely determined by $\theta$.
We claim that the map $$\mathfrak{b} : [\frac{2}{m+2}, 1) \to [0,1) , \, \theta \mapsto l(\theta) \, ,$$ is an increasing bijection. To prove the latter assertion, we construct for any given $0 \le l < 1$ a unique radially symmetric, decreasing solution $u(\cdot ; l)$ of and show that $\theta \equiv \theta(l) := \fint_{B_1} u(\cdot; l)$, satisfies $2/(m+2) \le \theta <1$ with $\theta(0) = 2/(m+2)$ and $\lim_{l \to 1} \theta(l)= 1$. First we note that $c$ is uniquely determined by $l$ since for any given $0 \le l < 1$, the solution of is given by a formula. To obtain it, note that the general radially symmetric solution of $- \Delta u = c$ on the annulus $B_1 \setminus {\overline}B_l$ is of the form $$u(r)=
\begin{cases}
-c\frac{r^2}{4}+a \ln(r) +b \qquad \quad \mbox{ if } m=2 \, ,\\
-c \frac{r^2}{2m} -\frac{a}{(m-2)r^{m-2}} +b \quad \mbox{ if } m\ge3
\end{cases}$$ for some real constants $a,$ $b,$ $c$. The condition $\frac {\partial u}{\partial \nu}(l) =0 $ implies that $a= \frac{l^m c}{m}$ so that the boundary condition $u(1)=0$ reads $$\label{np2}
u(r)=
\begin{cases}
\frac{c}{4}( 1 - r^2) + \frac{l^2 c}{2} \ln(r) \qquad \qquad \quad \quad \mbox{ if } m=2,\\
\frac{c}{2m}(1-r^2) + \frac{l^m c}{m(m-2)} (1-\frac{1}{r^{m-2}} ) \ \ \mbox{ if } m\ge3.
\end{cases}$$ The value of $c$ is now obtained by the requirement $u(l)=1$, $$\label{np3}
c=
\begin{cases}
\frac{1}{\frac{1-l^2}{4}+ \frac{l^2}{2}\ln(l)} \qquad \quad \quad \mbox{ if } m=2,\\
\frac{1}{\frac{1}{2m}+ \frac{l^m}{m(m-2)}-\frac{l^2}{2(m-2)}} \quad \mbox{ if } m\ge3.
\end{cases}$$ One verifies in a straightforward way that the resulting function $u \equiv u(\cdot; l)$ is decreasing for $l \le r \le 1$, that $\theta(0) = 2/(m+2),$ and that $l \mapsto c \equiv c(l)$ is a continuous, strictly increasing function of $0 \le l < 1$. We claim that $l \mapsto \theta(l)$ is also strictly increasing. To verify that this is indeed the case, one could explicitly compute $\theta$ in terms of $l$, but the formula is rather complicated. Instead we prove the claim by using the maximum principle. By contradiction, suppose there exist $0 \le l_2 < l_1 < 1$ with $ \theta_2:=\theta(l_2) > \theta_1:= \theta(l_1)$. By the considerations above, $ c_2:= c(l_2) < c_1:= c(l_1).$ Hence $-\Delta(u_1 - u_2) = c_1 - c_2 > 0$ on $B_1 \setminus B_{l_1}$ where $u_j:= u(\cdot, l_j)$ for $j=1,2$. Since $\theta_1 <\theta_2$, there exist $l_1 < r_1 < r_2 <1$ so that $(u_1 - u_2)(r) < 0$ for any $r_1 < r < r_2$, contradicting the maximum principle.
From the formula of $u(\cdot; l)$ one infers that $\theta(l)$ is a continuous function of $l$ and that and $\lim_{l \uparrow 1} \theta(l)= 1$. Hence for any $0 \le l < 1$, $u(\cdot; l)$ coincides with $u_\theta$ where $\theta \equiv \theta(l) = \fint_{B_1} u(\cdot; l)$. Altogether we have shown that $ \mathfrak{b}$ is a continuous, increasing bijection.
Define $g : [0, 1) \to {\mathbb{R}}$ by $$\label{formula g}
g(l) :=f(\theta(l)) = (1 - \theta(l)) \int_{B_1} | \nabla u_{\theta(l)}|^2 \, , \qquad \theta(l) := \mathfrak{b}^{-1}(l) \, .$$ In view of it then suffices to show that $g$ is increasing on $[0, 1)$.
We first consider the case $m=2$. Integrating by parts, one obtains from $$\int _{B_1} |\nabla u_{\theta(l)}|^2 = c(l) 2\pi \int_l^1u_{\theta(l)}(r) r dr,$$ and $$\theta(l)= l^2+ 2 \int_l^1u_{\theta(l)}(r) r dr.$$ Using and , one infers from that $$g(l)= 2\pi \frac{(\frac{1}{16}-\frac{l^2}{4}+ \frac{3l^4}{16}-\frac{l^4 \ln (l)}{4})(\frac{1}{8}-\frac{l^4}{8}+\frac{l^2 \ln(l)}{2} )}{(\frac 14-\frac{l^2}4+\frac{l^2}{2}\ln (l))^3},$$ and a straightforward computation yields $$g'(l)= \pi \frac{l(l^2-1)(-l^2+l^2\ln(l)+\ln(l)+1)(-5l^4+4l^4\ln(l)+4l^2+8l^2\ln(l)+1)}{(1-l^2+2l^2\ln(l))^4}.$$ By inspection one verifies that $g'(l) >0$ on $(0,1)$.
Without any additional effort we may consider the general case $m\ge 3$, and follow the line of arguments above. Integrating by parts, one has $$\int_{B_1} |\nabla u_{\theta(l)}|^2 = c(l) m \omega_m \int_l^1u_{\theta(l)}(r) r^{m-1} dr$$ and one computes that $$\theta(l) = l^m+ m \int_l^1u_{\theta(l)}(r) r^{m-1} dr.$$ Using formula for $m \ge 3$, one infers $$\int_l^1u_{\theta(l)}(r)r^{m-1} dr= c(l) \, \Big (\frac{l^m(l^2-1)}{2m(m-2)} +\frac {l^{m+2}-1}{2m(m+2)}+ \frac{l^m(1-l^m)}{m^2(m-2)}+\frac{1-l^m}{2m^2}\Big)$$ so that by $$\label{np4}
g(l)= c(l) m\omega_m \Big (1-l^m-m\int_l^1u_{\theta(l)}(r) r^{m-1} dr\Big)\int_l^1u_{\theta(l)}(r) r^{m-1} dr.$$
In the case $m=3$, one gets in this way $$g(l)=\frac{24\pi}{25}\frac{(5(1-l^3)+10l^3(1-l^3)-15l^3(1-l^2)-3(1-l^5))(1-l^5+5(l^3-l^2))}{(2l^3+1-3l^2)^3},$$ and a lengthy computation leads to the formula $$g'(l)=\frac{24\pi}{25} \frac{2 l (20 l^4 + 67 l^3 + 84 l^2 + 46 l + 8)}{(2 l + 1)^4}.$$ Clearly, $g'(l) >0$ on $(0,1)$ for $m=3$.[^1]
\(d) In this last part we prove that equality in holds if and only if $\Omega$ is a ball and $u$ is a multiple of the torsion function for that ball. Clearly, if $\Omega$ is a ball and $u$ is a multiple of the torsion function for that ball, then holds (see ). Conversely, assume that equality holds in . As in , we can re-scale the measure of $\Omega$ and the $L^\infty$-norm of $u$. Equality in implies that $u$ has the same Dirichlet integral as its Schwarz rearrangement $u^*$, $$\label{Dirichlet}
\int_{\Omega}|\nabla u|^2 dx= \int_{B_1}|\nabla u^*|^2 dx\, ,$$ and its Schwarz rearrangement is the solution of the obstacle problem on the ball $B_1$ – see . In view of the strict monotonicity of $f$ on $[\frac{2}{m+2}, \frac 23)$ (cf. part (a)) and the (strict) inequalities obtained above $\frac 23$ (cf. parts (a)-(c)), this implies that $\theta =\frac{2}{m+2}$, which corresponds to $l=0$ and to $c=2m$ (cf. , ). It means that $u^*$ is a multiple of the torsion function on $B_1$ (cf. ).
In order to justify that $u$ has to be equal to $u^*$, recall that holds and that $u^*$, being a multiple of the torsion function on $B_1$, has a critical set of zero measure. Equality between $u$ and $u^*$, up to a translation, comes from the classical result of Brothers and Ziemer [@BZ88 Theorem 1.1]. $\square$
[*Proof of Theorem* ]{} The key ingredient into the proof is inequality . First note that since for any $t > 0$, $\frac{1}{t^2}v_{\Omega}(tx)$ is the torsion function of $\frac{1}{t}\Omega$. Choosing $t = (|\Omega| /\omega_m)^{1/m}$, one infers that it suffices to prove estimate in the case $|\Omega| = \omega_m$.
We apply (i) to $$u(x)=\frac{v_{\Omega}(x)}{\|v_{\Omega}\|_{\infty}},\qquad x\in \Omega.$$ Observe that $\fint_{\Omega} u = \Phi(\Omega).$ First we consider the case where $\fint_{\Omega} u\ge \frac{2}{m+2}$. Then by $$\frac{1}{\|v_{\Omega}\|_{\infty}^2}\big(1-\Phi(\Omega)\big)\int_{\Omega}|\nabla v_{\Omega}|^2\ge \frac{4m^2}{(m+2)^2}\omega_m\, .$$ Since $- \Delta v_\Omega = 1,$ $$\frac{1}{\omega_m\|v_{\Omega}\|_{\infty}}\int_{\Omega} | \nabla v_{\Omega}|^2 =
\frac{1}{\omega_m\|v_{\Omega}\|_{\infty}}\int_{\Omega} v_{\Omega}=\Phi(\Omega).$$ Since $\Phi(\Omega) \le 1$, we find that $$\begin{aligned}
\|v_{\Omega}\|_{\infty}&\le \frac{(m+2)^2}{4m^2}\Phi(\Omega)\big(1-\Phi(\Omega)\big)\nonumber \\
& \le \frac{(m+2)^2}{4m^2}\big(1-\Phi(\Omega)\big),\end{aligned}$$ which gives . Next consider the case $\fint_{\Omega} u\le \frac{2}{m+2}$. Since by Saint Venant’s principle $\|v_\Omega\|_\infty \le \|v_{B_1}\|_\infty$ and since $ \|v_{B_1}\|_\infty = 1/2m$ we find that $$\begin{aligned}
1-\Phi(\Omega)&\ge \frac{m}{m+2}=\frac{2m^2}{m+2}.\frac{1}{2m}\nonumber \\ &
\ge \frac{2m^2}{m+2}\|v_{\Omega}\|_{\infty}.\end{aligned}$$ Note that $\frac{2m^2}{m+2} \ge \frac{4m^2}{(m+2)^2}$ and hence the estimate also holds in this case.\
Inequality follows from and . $\square$
[*Proof of Theorem* ]{} The key ingredient in the proof is inequality . Since $\Omega$ is connected, $\lambda_1(\Omega)$ has multiplicity $1$ and hence both, $\varphi_{1,\Omega}$ and $E(\Omega)$, are well defined. First note that since for any $t > 0$, $t^{m/2}\varphi_{1, \Omega}(tx)$ is the positive $L^2-$normalized Dirichlet eigenfunction of $\frac{1}{t}\Omega$, choosing $t = (|\Omega| /\omega_m)^{1/m}$, one infers that it suffices to prove estimate in the case $|\Omega| = \omega_m$. By (26) in [@vdB], one has $$\|\varphi_{1,\Omega}\|_{\infty}\le \bigg(\frac{e}{2\pi m}\bigg)^{m/4}\lambda_1(\Omega)^{m/4}.$$ Hence $\varphi_{1,\Omega}\in L^{\infty}(\Omega)$. We apply (i) to $$u(x)=\frac{\varphi_{1,\Omega}(x)}{\|\varphi_{1,\Omega}\|_{\infty}},\qquad x\in \Omega.$$ First we consider the case where $\fint_{\Omega} u\ge \frac{2}{m+2}$. Then by $$\big(1-\fint_{\Omega}u\big) \int_{\Omega}|\nabla u|^2 \ge \frac{4m^2}{(m+2)^2}\omega_m .$$ Since $\int_{\Omega}|\nabla u|^2=\lambda_1(\Omega)\int_{\Omega}u^2\le \lambda_1(\Omega)\omega_m$, and $\fint_{\Omega} u=E(\Omega)$ we obtain, $$\label{p67}
\lambda_1(\Omega)\ge \frac{4m^2}{(m+2)^2}\big(1-E(\Omega)\big)^{-1}.$$ Now let us consider the case where $\fint_{\Omega} u\le \frac{2}{m+2}$. Then $1-E(\Omega) \ge \frac{m}{m+2}$, and hence by Faber Krahn, $$\label{p68}
\lambda_1(\Omega)\ge \lambda_1(B_1) \frac{m}{m+2}\big(1-E(\Omega)\big)^{-1}.$$ Combining and gives $$\label{p69}
\lambda_1(\Omega)\ge \min\bigg\{\frac{4m^2}{(m+2)^2},\frac{m}{m+2}\lambda_1(B_1)\bigg\}\big(1-E(\Omega)\big)^{-1}.$$ To finish the proof we recall that $$\label{p70}
\lambda_1(B_1)=j^2_{(m-2)/2}.$$ By the results of [@LL], we have that $$\label{p71}
j^2_{(m-2)/2}\ge \frac{m(m+8)}{4}.$$ Hence by , , , $$\lambda_1(\Omega)\ge \frac{4m^2}{(m+2)^2}\big(1-E(\Omega)\big)^{-1} ,$$ which is the inequality in the case $|\Omega | = \omega_m$. $\square$
\[rem1\] By an elementary computation, using the expression for $g$ in terms of $l$ from , one can show that $$\forall m\ge 2, \quad \lim_{\theta \uparrow 1} f(\theta) = \frac{4}{9}m^2 \omega_m.$$
\[rem2\] If $\Omega$ is any open set in ${\mathbb{R}}^m$ with $0<|\Omega|<\infty$, then $$\label{p17}
\lambda_1(\Omega)\ge \frac{\nu_m\mu_m}{\nu_m+\mu_m}\big(1-\Phi(\Omega)\big)^{-1}|\Omega|^{-2/m},$$ and $$\label{p18}
\|v_{\Omega}\|_{\infty}\le \mathfrak{c}_m\frac{\nu_m+\mu_m}{\nu_m\mu_m}\big(1-\Phi(\Omega)\big)|\Omega|^{2/m},$$ where $$\nu_m=\frac{2m\omega_m^{2/m}}{m+2},$$ $$\mu_m = \lambda_1(B_1)|B_1|^{2/m} =j_{(m-2)/2}^2\omega_m^{2/m},$$ and where $\mathfrak{c}_m$ is defined in .
The proof of and is elementary but the constants are not as good as in Theorem \[the9\](ii).
[*Proof of Remark .*]{} In [@vdBFNT Theorem 1.1] it was shown that $$\label{p19}
\frac{\|v_{\Omega}\|_1\lambda_1(\Omega)}{|\Omega|}\le 1-\frac{\nu_m\|v_{\Omega}\|_1}{|\Omega|^{(m+2)/m}}.$$ Since $1 \le \lambda_1(\Omega) \|v_\Omega\|_\infty$ by it then follows from that $$\label{p20}
\|v_{\Omega}\|_1\le \lambda_1(\Omega)\|v_{\Omega}\|_{\infty}\bigg(\frac{\lambda_1(\Omega)}{|\Omega|}+\frac{\nu_m}{|\Omega|^{(m+2)/m}}\bigg)^{-1}.$$ Faber Krahn asserts that $$\label{p21}
\lambda_1(\Omega)|\Omega|^{2/m}\ge \lambda_1(B_1)|B_1|^{2/m}=\mu_m.$$ By and , $$\begin{aligned}
\Phi(\Omega)&\le \frac{\lambda_1(\Omega)}{\lambda_1(\Omega)+\nu_m|\Omega|^{-2/m}}\nonumber \\ &
=1-\frac{\nu_m}{\lambda_1(\Omega)|\Omega|^{2/m}+\nu_m}\nonumber \\ &
\le 1-\frac{\nu_m}{\lambda_1(\Omega)|\Omega|^{2/m}\big(1+\frac{\nu_m}{\mu_m}\big)}.\end{aligned}$$ This implies the assertion . Inequality follows from and . $\square$
Below we show that $\lambda_1(\Omega)$ cannot be bounded from above in terms of $(1-E(\Omega))^{-1}|\Omega|^{-2/m}$ nor of $(1-\Phi(\Omega))^{-1}|\Omega|^{-2/m}$.
\[rem3\] We have $$\label{ea1}
\sup\{\lambda_1(\Omega)(1-E(\Omega))|\Omega|^{2/m}:\Omega\,\textup{open, convex},\,0<|\Omega|<\infty\}=+\infty,$$ and $$\label{ea2}
\sup\{\lambda_1(\Omega)(1-\Phi(\Omega))|\Omega|^{2/m}:\Omega\,\textup{open, convex},\,0<|\Omega|<\infty\}=+\infty.$$
Let $\Omega_n=\{x_1^2+...+x_{m-1}^2<1, -\frac{n}{2}<x_m<\frac{n}{2}\}$. Then $\lambda_1(\Omega_n)\ge (m-1)\pi^2.$ A straightforward calculation shows that for an interval of length $L,\, L>0,\,
E((0,L))=\frac{2}{\pi}$. By separation of variables $E(\Omega_n)=\frac{2^m}{\pi^m}$. We conclude that the supremum in is bounded from below by $(m-1)\big(1-\frac{2^m}{\pi^m}\big)\pi^2n^{2/m}.$ Letting $n\rightarrow\infty$ concludes the proof of .
$\Phi(\Omega_n)$ cannot be computed in closed form by separation of variables. For large $n$ however, we have approximate separation of the $x_m$ variable. Similar to , $\|v_{\Omega_n}\|_1\le n\|v_{(0,1)^{m-1}}\|_1$, and $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\|v_{\Omega_n}\|_{\infty}=\|v_{(0,1)^{m-1}}\|_{\infty}$. Hence for any $\varepsilon\in(0,1)$, there exists $N_{\varepsilon}\in {\mathbb{N}}$ such that for all $n\ge N_{\varepsilon}$, $\|v_{\Omega_n}\|_{\infty}\ge(1-\varepsilon)\|v_{(0,1)^{m-1}}\|_{\infty}.$ It follows that $\Phi(\Omega_n)\le (1-\varepsilon)^{-1}\Phi((0,1)^{m-1})$. We choose $\varepsilon=\frac12(1-\Phi((0,1)^{m-1}))$, and obtain that for all $n$ sufficiently large, $$1-\Phi(\Omega_n)\ge \frac{1-\Phi((0,1)^{m-1})}{1+\Phi((0,1)^{m-1})}.$$ We conclude that for all $n$ sufficiently large, the supremum in is bounded from below by $$\frac{(m-1)(1-\Phi((0,1)^{m-1}))\pi^2n^{2/m}}{(1+\Phi((0,1)^{m-1}))}.$$ Letting $n\rightarrow\infty$ concludes the proof of .
[**Acknowledgments.**]{} MvdB and TK acknowledge support by the Leverhulme Trust through Emeritus Fellowship EM-2018-011-9, and the Swiss National Science Foundation respectively. DB was supported by the LabEx PERSYVAL-Lab GeoSpec (ANR-11-LABX-0025-01) and ANR SHAPO (ANR-18-CE40-0013).
[99]{}
T. Beck, The torsion function of convex domains of high eccentricity. Potential Analysis, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11118-019-09785-9
M. van den Berg, Estimates for the torsion function and Sobolev constants. Potential Analysis 36, 607–616 (2012)
M. van den Berg, Spectral bounds for the torsion function. Integral Equations and Operator Theory 88, 387–400 (2017)
M. van den Berg, G. Buttazzo, B. Velichkov, Optimization problems involving the first Dirichlet eigenvalue and the torsional rigidity. New Trends in Shape Optimization, Int. Series Numerical Math. Eds. A. Pratelli, G. Leugering (Birkhäuser) 166, 19–41 (2016)
M. van den Berg, T. Carroll, Hardy inequality and $L^p$ estimates for the torsion function. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 41, 980–986 (2009)
M. van den Berg, F. Della Pietra, G. di Blasio, N. Gavitone, Efficiency and localisation for the first Dirichlet eigenfunction. January 2020, arXiv:1905.06591.
M. van den Berg, V. Ferone, C. Nitsch, C. Trombetti, On Pólya’s inequality for torsional rigidity and first Dirichlet eigenvalue, Integral Equations and Operator Theory 86, 579–600 (2016)
M. van den Berg, S. Srisatkunarajah, Heat flow and Brownian motion for a region in ${\Bbb R}^{2}$ with a polygonal boundary. Probability Theory and Related Fields 86, 41–52 (1990)
J.E. Brothers, W.P. Ziemer, Minimal rearrangements of Sobolev functions, Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 384, 153–179 (1988)
D. Bucur, G. Buttazzo, Variational methods in shape optimization problems. Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications, 65. Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA (2005)
D. Cioranescu, F. Murat, A strange term coming from nowhere. Topics in the mathematical modelling of composite materials. Progr. Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl. 31, pp. 45–93. Birkhäuser, Boston (1997)
G. Dal Maso, U. Mosco, Wiener’s criterion and $\Gamma$-convergence. Appl. Math. Optim. 15, 15–63 (1987)
F. Della Pietra, N. Gavitone, S. Guarino Lo Bianco, On functionals involving the torsional rigidity related to some classes of nonlinear operators. J. Differential Equations 265, 6424–6442 (2018)
G. Eisen, The obstacle problem with a volume constraint. Manuscripta Mathematica 43, 73–83 (1983)
T. Giorgi, R. G. Smits, Principal eigenvalue estimates via the supremum of torsion. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 59, 987–1011 (2010)
D. S. Grebenkov, B.-T. Nguyen, Geometrical structure of Laplacian eigenfunctions. SIAM Rev. 55, 601–667 (2013)
A. Henrot, I. Lucardesi, G. Philippin, On two functionals involving the maximum of the torsion function. ESAIM: Control Optim. Calc. Var. 24, 1585–1604 (2018)
L. Lorch, Some inequalities for the first positive zeros of Bessel functions. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 24, 814–823 (1993)
L. E. Payne, I. Stakgold, On the mean value of the fundamental mode in the fixed membrane problem. Collection of articles dedicated to Alexander Weinstein on the occasion of his 75th birthday. Applicable Anal. 3, 295–306 (1973)
G. Pólya, G. Szegö, *Isoperimetric Inequalities in Mathematical Physics*, Ann. of Math. Stud. 27, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1951)
B. Simon, *Functional integration and quantum physics*. Pure and Applied Mathematics, 86. Academic Press, Inc. \[Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers\], New York-London (1979)
R. Sperb, Maximum principles and applications, Academic Press, Inc. \[Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers\], New York-London (1981)
H. Vogt, $L_{\infty}$ estimates for the torsion function and $L_{\infty}$ growth of semigroups satisfying Gaussian bounds. Potential Anal. 51, 37–47 (2019)
[^1]: For general $m \ge 4$, the formula for $g'$ can be computed to be a quotient of two polynomials with degrees depending on $m$. We believe that $g'(l)$ is strictly positive for every $l$ on $(0,1)$, but a direct proof, covering all dimensions $m\ge 5$, based on the formula of $g'$ seems out of reach. For $m=4$ the quotient of the polynomials simplifies, and gives $g(l)=\omega_4\Big(\frac {16}{3}l^2+\frac{16}{9}\Big ).$ We see that for $m=4$, $g(1)=\frac{64\omega_4}{9}$ agrees with the value $f(1)$ given in Remark \[rem1\]. We also have that $g(0)=\frac{16\omega_4}{3}$ agrees with the value $f(1/3)$ from Theorem \[the9\](i). Indeed for $m=4$ and $\theta=\frac13$ we have equality in . Note that for $m=4$, $g(l)$ is increasing on $(0,1)$.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We present a novel solver for an analogue to Poisson’s equation in the framework of modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND). This equation is highly non-linear and hence standard codes based upon tree structures and/or FFT’s in general are not applicable; one needs to defer to multi-grid relaxation techniques. After a detailed description of the necessary modifications to the cosmological code [`AMIGA`]{} (formerly known as [`MLAPM`]{}) we utilize the new code to revisit the issue of cosmic structure formation under MOND. We find that the proper (numerical) integration of a MONDian Poisson’s equation has some noticable effects on the final results when compared against simulations of the same kind but based upon rather ad-hoc assumptions about the properties of the MONDian force field. Namely, we find that the large-scale structure evolution is faster in our revised MOND model leading to an even stronger clustering of galaxies, especially when compared to the standard paradigm.'
author:
- |
Claudio Llinares$^{1}$, Alexander Knebe$^{1}$, HongSheng Zhao$^{2}$\
$^{1}$Astrophysical Institute Potsdam, An der Sternwarte 16, Germany\
$^{2}$SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St. Andrews, North Haugh, St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9SS, UK
bibliography:
- 'references.bib'
date: 'Submitted Version ...'
title: 'Cosmological Structure Formation under MOND: a new numerical solver for Poisson’s equation'
---
\[firstpage\]
galaxy: formation – methods: $N$-body simulations – cosmology: theory – dark matter – large scale structure of Universe
Introduction {#sec:introduction}
============
Modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) was proposed by @Milgrom83 as an alternative to Newtonian gravity to explain galactic dynamics without the need for dark matter. Although current cosmological observations point to the existence of vast amounts of non-baryonic dark matter in the Universe [e.g. @Komatsu08], it remains interesting to explore other alternatives, especially as not all of the features of CDM models appear to match observational data (e.g., the “missing satellite problem” [@Klypin99; @Moore99] and the so-called “cusp-core crisis” [e.g. @deBlok03; @Swaters03]). In that regards it appears important to look for tests able to discriminate between MOND and Newtonian gravity, especially in the context of cosmology now that there exist various relativistic formulation of the MOND theory [@Bekenstein04; @Zhao07; @Zhao08]. However, progress in that field has been hampered by the fact that MOND is a non-linear theory making any analytical predictions as well as numerical simulations a tedious task. To date, only a few codes exist that actually solve the MONDian analogue to Poisson equation in a non-cosmological context [@Brada99; @Nipoti07; @Tiret07], none of which is publically available. We are augmenting this list by making available a new solver for the MONDian Poisson’s equation primarily designed to work in a cosmological context but readily adjusted to allow for simulations of isolated galaxies.
Until recently MOND was merely a heuristic theory tailored to fit rotation curves with little (if any) predictive power for cosmological structure formation. One of the most severe problems for the general appreciation and acknowledgment of MOND as a “real” theory (and a conceivable replacement for dark matter) was the lack of success to formulate the theory in a general relativistic manner. This situation though changed during the last couple of years and at present there are a number of covariant theories (e.g. [@Bekenstein04; @Zhao07; @Zhao08]) whose non-relativistic weak acceleration limit accords with MOND while its non-relativistic strong acceleration regime is Newtonian. However, there remains a lot to be done with regards to the relativistic formulations of MOND in order to a get completly acceptable theory. But nevertheless has MOND reached a stage of development in wich we can think in doing cosmology with reducing the need of unjustifiable assumptions. Furthermore, the study of cosmological structure formation in the non-linear regime will provide new constrains on such generalizations of MOND.
The first valiant attempts at simulating cosmic structure formation under the influence of MOND were done by @Nusser02 and @Knebe04 [KG04 from now on]. While their studies provided great insights into the non-linear clustering behaviour of MONDian objects (we dare to call them galaxies as none of these simulations included the physics of baryons) they were still based upon some rather unjustifyable assumptions. The main objective of this paper now is to refine the implementation of MOND in the code [`AMIGA`]{}(successor of `MLAPM`, @Knebe01), i.e. we modified the code to numerically integrate a MONDian analogue to Poisson’s equation. This equation is a highly non-linear partial differential equation whose solution is non-trivial to obtain. Only sophisticated multi-grid relaxation techniques (on adaptive meshes of arbitrary geometry) are capable of tackling this task. We argue that only when MOND has been thoroughly and “properly” studied and tested against can we safely either rule it out for once and always or confirm this rather venturesome theory. The theory has become a valid competitor to dark matter and it therefore only appears natural – if not mandatory – to (re-)consider its implications. We developed a tool and the subsequently necessary analysis apparatus allowing to test and discriminate cosmological structure formation in a MONDian Universe from the standard dark matter paradigm and used it to study a particular model of MOND theory.
The MONDian Equations {#sec:equations}
=====================
Despite the recent progress made in obtaining, refining and studying covariant formulations of the MOND theory [cf. @Bekenstein04; @Zhao07; @Zhao08], there are still certain ambiguities in contriving a closed a set of equations-of-motion suitable for an code. We will work out such a set in this Section.
#### Non-MONDian Cosmology {#non-mondian-cosmology .unnumbered}
We like to remind the reader that in a cosmological code one integrates the *comoving* equations of motion
$$\label{eq:eom}
\begin{array}{rcl}
\displaystyle \dot{\vecx}
& = &\displaystyle {\vecp \over m a^2} \ , \\
\\
\displaystyle \dot{\vecp}
& = &-\displaystyle m \nabla \Phi_N \\
\end{array}$$
which are completed by Poisson’s equation for the Newtonian potential $\Phi_N$ responsible for peculiar accelerations
$$\label{eq:PoissonNewton}
\displaystyle \vecnabla \cdot \left[ \nabla\Phi_N(\vecx) \right]
= \frac{4 \pi G}{a} \left(\rho(\vecx) - \overline{\rho} \right) \ .$$
In these equations $a$ is the cosmic expansion factor, $\vecx =
\vecr/a$ the comoving coordinate, $\vecp$ the canonical momentum, $\vecnabla \cdot$ the divergence operator with respect to $\vecx$, $\rho$ ($\bar \rho$) the comoving (background) density, and
\[eq:ForceNewton\] \_N() = -\_N()
the Newtonian *peculiar acceleration field in comoving coordinates*.
The next step now is to define an analogon to [Eq. (\[eq:PoissonNewton\])]{} that takes into account the effects of MOND in cosmology.
#### MONDian Cosmology {#mondian-cosmology .unnumbered}
In order to get an equation for the comoving peculiar MONDian potential $\Phi_M$ we have to make a decision about which covariant generalization of MOND we want to use. Assuming the $\mu$ function to be constant in space, a non-relativistic limit of the covariant theory by @Zhao08 can be written as follows
\[eq:PoissonMOND\] = (-|) .
where $\mu(x)$ is $\mu\rightarrow1$ for $x\gg 1$ (Newtonian limit) and $\mu\rightarrow x$ for $x\ll 1$ (MONDian limit) [cf. @Milgrom83]. We further took the liberty to encode the MONDian acceleration scale $\gamma(a)$ as a (possible) function of the cosmic expansion factor $a$ for reasons that will become clear later on (cf. [Section \[sec:cosmology\]]{}). The most naive choice would be $\gamma(a) = g_0 = 1.2\times 10^{-8}{\rm cm}/{\rm sec}^2$ whereas other theories may lead to different dependencies; for instance, in @Zhao08 $\gamma(a)$ is given as $\gamma(a)=a^{1/2}g_0$.
In analogy to [Eq. (\[eq:ForceNewton\])]{} we define
\[eq:ForceMOND\] \_M() = -\_M()
as the MONDian *peculiar acceleration field in comoving coordinates*.
#### The Curl-Field {#the-curl-field .unnumbered}
The relation between the MONDian and the Newtonian force, i.e. [Eq. (\[eq:ForceNewton\])]{} and [Eq. (\[eq:ForceMOND\])]{}, is given by [@Bekenstein84]
\[eq:curl\] ()**g**\_M = **g**\_N + ,
where an otherwise unspecified curl-field
= ,
appears that has been shown to vanish for any kind of symmetry [@Bekenstein84]. Previous studies on cosmological structure formation under MOND neglected the curl-field $\mathbf C$ as this allows to use a standard solver for the Newtonian Poisson’s equation (\[eq:PoissonNewton\]) and then an inversion of [Eq. (\[eq:curl\])]{} to obtain the MONDian forces [@Nusser02 KG04]. However, this leads to parallel Newtonian and MONDian forces which is not necessarily the case! The more correct approach is to directly solve [Eq. (\[eq:PoissonMOND\])]{} and in the following Section we present a novel solver that numerically solves for the MONDian potential $\Phi_M$ to be used with [Eq. (\[eq:ForceMOND\])]{} in order to integrate the equations-of-motion (\[eq:eom\]) for $N$ particles. The solution to [Eq. (\[eq:PoissonMOND\])]{} can in turn be used together with [Eq. (\[eq:curl\])]{} to actually study the curl-field $\mathbf C$ and its effects.
The code {#sec:code}
========
Conventional Poisson solvers used throughout (computational) cosmology are no longer applicable to [Eq. (\[eq:PoissonMOND\])]{}. All of the standard methods such as Fast-Fourier-Transform (FFT) based Particle Mesh (PM) codes, tree codes, expansion codes, and their variants rely on the linearity of Poisson’s equation. The corresponding MONDian Poisson equation (\[eq:PoissonMOND\]) though is a non-linear partial differential equation which requires more subtle and refined techniques to be solved numerically. We are now going to elaborate upon the steps required to adjust a given relaxation solver to account for the complexity of the MONDian Poisson’s equation and any arbitray MONDian interpolation function $\mu(x)$.
Solving the MONDian Poisson’s equation via multi-grid relaxation
----------------------------------------------------------------
The code used is a modification of the open source cosmological code [`AMIGA`]{} that is the sucessor of [`MLAPM`]{} [@Knebe01]. We conserve the equations of motion of the original code (i.e. [Eq. (\[eq:eom\])]{}) but we now numerically integrate the MONDian Poisson’s equation (\[eq:PoissonMOND\]). The fact that the new equation for the potential is non-linear prevents us from using the standard methods (cf. above); we rather need to adhere to a multi-grid relaxation technique [e.g., @Brandt77; @Press92; @Knebe01]. The method consists of discretizing the equation on a grid and solving the non linear system of algebraic equations by relaxing a trial potential $\Phi$ until convergence. We adhere to the discretisation proposed by @Brada99 and already used by @Tiret07
\[eq:discretiz\] & &(\_[i+1/2]{}(\_[i+1]{} - ) + \_[i-1/2]{}(- \_[i-1]{}) +\
& & \_[j+1/2]{}(\_[j+1]{} - ) + \_[j-1/2]{}(- \_[j-1]{}) +\
& & \_[k+1/2]{}(\_[k+1]{} - ) + \_[k-1/2]{}(- \_[k-1]{}) ) / [h\^2]{} =\
& & \_[i,j,k]{} ,
where $\rho_{i,j,k}$ is the density contrast in cell $(i,j,k)$ on a grid with spacing $h$, $\phi$ is the potential in cell $(i,j,k)$ with $\phi_{i\pm 1}$ the potential in the neighbouring cells $(i\pm
1,j,k)$. The same terminology applies to the other two spatial dimensions. The coefficient $\mu_{i+1/2}$ is the evaluation of the $\mu(x)$ function at the point $(i+1/2, j, k)$, etc.
Reordering [Eq. (\[eq:discretiz\])]{} we get
\[eq:disc\_poi\] & &\_[i+1/2]{}\_[i+1]{} + \_[i-1/2]{}\_[i-1]{} +\
& &\_[j+1/2]{}\_[j+1]{} + \_[j-1/2]{}\_[j-1]{} +\
& &\_[k+1/2]{}\_[k+1]{} + \_[k-1/2]{}\_[k-1]{} -\
& & (\_[i+1/2]{}+\_[i-1/2]{}+\_[j+1/2]{}+\
& & \_[j-1/2]{}+\_[k+1/2]{}+\_[k-1/2]{})=\
& & \_[i,j,k]{}
where we can see that this way of discretising the equation is similar to the standard discretization of the Newtonian Poisson’s equation, but the potential is “weighted” by the $\mu$ function. Given the nature of the $\mu$ function under MOND it can be set to unity for accelerations larger than $g_0$ and we then recover the standard discretisation of the Newtonian Poisson’s equation (cf. equation (11) in @Knebe01).
The gradient of the potential, i.e. $\nabla \phi$, in the argument of $\mu(x)$ needs to be disctretized, too. We choose the following form
\[eq:gradient\] ( ()\_x)\_[i+1/2]{} & = &\
(()\_y)\_[i+1/2]{} & = & ,\
(()\_z)\_[i+1/2]{} & = &
![Stencil (27 points) used in the discretization of the MONDian Poisson’s equation (cf. [Eq. (\[eq:disc\_poi\])]{}). The argument of the $\mu(x)$ function is approximated in points indicated by the open circle, i.e. in-between the standard nodes. The triangles show the cells used to calculate the gradient in that point (cf. [Eq. (\[eq:gradient\])]{}).[]{data-label="fig:discretiz"}](figures/discretiz){width="45.00000%"}
The nodes used in this discretisation are highlihted in [Figure \[fig:discretiz\]]{}.
There are two possible choices for the relaxation procedure. We can either re-order terms in [Eq. (\[eq:disc\_poi\])]{} again (while freezing the coefficients $\mu_{i\pm 1/2}, \mu_{j\pm 1/2}, \mu_{k\pm 1/2}$) in a way that we get
\[eq:iteration\] = f(\_[i1]{}, \_[j1]{}, \_[k1]{}, \_[i1/2]{}, \_[j1/2]{}, \_[k1/2]{}, \_[i,j,k]{}) ,
or we can apply one step of a Newton-Raphson root-finding algorithm to $0 = \phi-f(\phi_{i\pm 1}, \phi_{j\pm 1}, \phi_{k\pm 1}, \mu_{i\pm
1/2}, \mu_{j\pm 1/2}, \mu_{k\pm 1/2}, \rho_{i,j,k})$ [@Press92]. These two alternatives show similar rate of convergence that goes in favour of one or the other according to the density. Our method of choice is the iterative procedure as it involves fewer calculations.
We still need to define a “colouring”-scheme, i.e. a way of how to sweep through the whole grid and (iteratively) update the potential $\phi$ in a given cell $(i,j,k)$. The ordering of the iterations is given by a generalization of the standard two-colour/red-black method and sketched in [Figure \[fig:colors\]]{}. One iteration step is complete after sweeping eight times trought the grid updating those nodes per sweep that have identical numbers as indicated in [Figure \[fig:colors\]]{}.
We further coded additional iteration schemes (e.g., lexicographic and zebra in three directions) and the code switches automatically between them in extreme cases for which the convergence with the 8 colours is slow. For an elaborate discussion of multi-grid relaxation techniques and colouring-schemes in particular we refer the interested reader to @Wesseling92.
![Eight-colour scheme used for obtaining an iterative solution of [Eq. (\[eq:PoissonMOND\])]{} (cf. also [Eq. (\[eq:iteration\])]{}). The numbers indicate the ordering by which the nodes that are updated.[]{data-label="fig:colors"}](figures/colors){width="50.00000%"}
A numerical solution $\Phi^k_n$ has converged after $n$ iterations on a grid $k$ if the norm $||\cdot||$ (mean or maximun value in the grid) of the residual \[eq:residual\] [*e*]{}\^k = L\^k(\^k\_n)- (-|)
is small compared against the norm of the truncation error
\[eq:truncation\_error\] \^k = L\^[k-1]{}(R\^k\_n) - R L\^k(\^k\_n)
i.e. $||{\it e}^k|| < 0.1 ||\tau^k||$. The value $0.1$ has been determined heuristically. Here, $L^k$ denotes the discretization of the left hand side of [Eq. (\[eq:PoissonMOND\])]{} on a grid $k$, $L^{k-1}$ the same discretization in the next coarser grid and $R$ is the restriction operator used to interpolate values from the grid $k$ to the grid $k-1$.
Tests {#sec:tests}
-----
In order to verify and gauge the credibility of our numerical solver we performed two complementary tests. The first simply assesses the recovery of the potential for a given solution of the MONDian Poisson’s equation. The second test checks whether or not we recover the same temporal evolution of a (cosmological) simulation when setting the MONDian acceleration $g_0$ to such a low value that it will not affect structure formation (Newtonian limit).
### Static test
![Relative error in the potential (upper panel) and the forces (lower panel) recovered with the solver on a $64^3$ grid for a Hernquist profile as a function of radius. The solid (red) line is the diagonal across the box while the dots represent a random sample of all grid points.[]{data-label="fig:hernquist_errors"}](figures/hernquist_errors){width="45.00000%"}
As a first (static) test for the numerical potential solver, we present the recovery of the analytical potential for a known analytical solution of the MONDian Poisson’s equation (\[eq:PoissonMOND\]). To this extent we actually start with an analytical description for a spherically symmetric potential akin to the Hernquist profile [@Hernquist90]
\[eq:HQSTpot\] \_H = - + () .
We added a logarithm to the potential in order to mach the properties of the solution of the MOND equation (far from any source, the MONDian forces are proportional to $\ln{(r)}$). We then derive the density by substituting [Eq. (\[eq:HQSTpot\])]{} into [Eq. (\[eq:PoissonMOND\])]{}
[rcl]{} & = &\
\
A & = & +\
\
B & = & +\
\
C & = & 1+
The test is performed with non-periodic boundary conditions on a regular 64$^3$ grid by fixing the solution on the border to the analytical values. [Figure \[fig:hernquist\_errors\]]{} now shows the fractional error in the potential (upper panel) and force (lower panel). The constants in the potential for this particular test are: $M=10^{10}M_\odot$, $r_c=2.5\times 10^{-3}$ Mpc and $r_0=0.01$ Mpc. The box used was $0.01$ Mpc. With this choice for the parameters, the force gradually changes from a purely Newtonian regime in the central parts to deep MONDian in the outer regions. The fractional errors are calculated as the difference between the analytical potential and forces on the grid and the numerical solution obtained by our solver. The solid red line shows the error as a function of radius along the diagonal in the box while the dots represent a random sample of all grid points.[^1] We can clearly see that the error is never larger than 1 per cent indicating the excellent quality of our numerical integration scheme.
### Dynamic test
![Density distribution at redshift $z=0$ for the $64^3$ particle test simulation in the Newtonian limit ($g_0=10^{-12}$ cm/s$^2$, upper panel) and the corresponding Newtonian run (lower panel).[]{data-label="fig:density_064"}](figures/density_064){width="45.00000%"}
![Power spectrum of the $64^3$ particle test simulation at redshift $z=0$.[]{data-label="fig:power_064"}](figures/power_064){width="45.00000%"}
![Mass function of the $64^3$ particle test simulation at redshift $z=0$.[]{data-label="fig:massfunc_064"}](figures/massfunc_064){width="45.00000%"}
Having established the credibility of our numerical integrator for [Eq. (\[eq:PoissonMOND\])]{}, we now test the temporal evolution of our code by using a cosmological simulation in the Newtonian limit, i.e. lowering the MONDian acceleration $g_0$ to such a low value that it will not impact upon structure formation. For that purpose we used $g_0=10^{-12}$cm/s$^2$ and compare the final output to a simulation run with the standard Newtonian code. The simulation fascilitated $64^3$ particles in a box of comoving side length $15$. The cosmology is characterized by $\Omega_0$=0.3, $\Omega_{\Lambda, 0}$=0.7, $\sigma_8$=0.9, and $h=0.7$ but actually of no relevance for this particular test.
A first visual impression of the density field in given in [Figure \[fig:density\_064\]]{} where we show the grey-scaled density at each particle position of the simulation at redshift $z=0$. The differences are at best marginal indicating that the modified solver performs correctly in the Newtonian limit. A more quantitative comparison can be found in [Figure \[fig:power\_064\]]{} where we show the matter power spectrum at redshift $z=0$. The curves are indistinguishable which is proven by the ratio of the two curves plotted as a dotted line (lowered for clarity by the factor 0.001). We further ran the MPI enabled halo finder [`AHF`]{}[^2] (Knollmann et al. 2008, in prep.) over both simulations. The resulting mass functions of identified objects is given in [Figure \[fig:massfunc\_064\]]{}. Again, there are at best differences that are readily ascribed to numerical errors during the time integration due to our vastly different schemes of solving Poisson’s equation in the two test runs.
Cosmological simulations {#sec:cosmology}
========================
To date there is only a limited number of cosmological simulations aiming at studying the effect sof MOND in a full cosmological context [@Nusser02 KG04]. However, both these investigations “simply” solved for the Newtonian forces and modified them according to a non-cosmological MOND prescription prior to being used with the equations-of-motion (cf. [Eq. (\[eq:eom\])]{}). They both showed that, under their respective heuristic formulations, MOND can lead to large-scale clustering patterns aking to a model.
In the present study we are going to abandon (at least) one of the assumptions made by these authors, namely that $\mathbf C=\mathbf 0$ and hence that [Eq. (\[eq:curl\])]{} can be inverted to obtain a function $\mathbf g_M(\mathbf g_N)$. Here we numerically integrate the MONDian analogue to Poisson’s equation (\[eq:PoissonMOND\]) which directly leads to considering the influence of the yet unkown and unregarded curl-field $\mathbf C$ in the process of structure formation. The “only” assumption we adhere to is that MOND does not affects fluctuations and leaves the background cosmology intact [e.g., @Nusser02; @Knebe04]. We defer to a later study that will make use of modified Friedmann equations accounting for the effects of MOND.
The Simulation Details
----------------------
label $\Omega_0$ $\Omega_b$ $\lambda_0$ $\sigma_8^{z=0}$ $\sigma_8^{\rm norm}$ $g_0$ \[cm/s$^2$\]
---------- ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------------ ----------------------- ----------------------
0.30 0.04 0.7 0.88 0.88 —
OCBMond 0.04 0.04 0.0 0.92 0.40 1.2 $\times 10^{-8}$
OCBMond2 0.04 0.04 0.0 0.92 0.40 1.2 $\times 10^{-8}$
: Model parameters. In all cases a value for the Hubble parameter of $h=0.7$ was employed. For model OCBMond we explicitly assumed $\mathbf C=\mathbf 0$ whereas OCBMond2 is based upon a numerical integration of the MONDian Poisson’s equation as described in [Section \[sec:code\]]{}.[]{data-label="tab:simulations"}
Following KG04 and using the input power spectra derived with the CMBFAST code [@Seljak96] we displace $128^3$ particles from their initial positions on a regular lattice using the Zel’dovich approximation [@Efstathiou85]. The box size was chosen to be 32 on a side. This choice guarantees proper treatment of the fundamental mode which will still be in the linear regime at $z=0$ (cf. the scale turning non-linear at $z=0$ is roughly 20 for the models under investigation). The particulars (and terminology) of the models under investigation are summarized in [Table \[tab:simulations\]]{}.
As we used the (Newtonian) Zeldovich approximation to generate the initial conditions we need to make sure that the universe is still Newtonian at the starting redshift. To this extent our choice for the (free) function $\gamma(a)$ in [Eq. (\[eq:PoissonMOND\])]{} is $\gamma(a) = a
g_0$. This ensures that $\mu(\mathbf x) = 1$ and hence [Eq. (\[eq:PoissonMOND\])]{} reduces to the Newtonian case [Eq. (\[eq:PoissonNewton\])]{}. We need to acknowledge that this differs from the treatment in KG04 who actually used $\gamma(a)=g_0$; their simulations did not start early enough and were in parts already MONDian at the initial redshift. However, as we will see later on during the analysis of the runs that our results hardly differ from the findings of KG04. We further like to mention that the present study does not aim at distinguishing one MOND theory from another! We merely apply our novel solver to one particular MOND model of our choice showing that this implementation can lead to results that are at least comparable to the favoured structure formation scenario. Besides, we also like to study the effects of the yet unregarded and unkown curl-field $\mathbf C$ upon gravitational structure formation, irrespective of the applicability of our particular MOND model to reality; we leave a detailed study of various MOND realisations to a future paper.
The particles were evolved from redshift $z=50$ until $z=0$ and in all three runs a force resolution of 6 was reached in the highest density regions. The mass resolution of the runs is $m_p = 1.30\times
10^{9}$ for the model and $m_p = 0.17\times
10^{9}$ for the two low-$\Omega_0$ models, respectively. We output 26 snapshots of the particle positions and velocities equally spaced in time $t$ inbetween redshifts $z=5$ and $z=0$. These outputs are then analysed with respect to their large-scale clustering patterns as well as properties of individual objects employing the MPI enabled halo finder [`AHF`]{} again. For that purpose we though switched off the unbinding procedure; we rather collect all particles within a certain region of a local density peak and refer to them as “object particles” defining the properties of that object. To be more precise, [`AHF`]{} locates density maxima in the simulation by invoking the original adaptive-mesh hierarchy again used during the simulation procedure. For each of these peaks we step out in logarithmically spaced radial bins until the mean density inside that (spherical) sphere drops below a fiducial value $\Delta \times \rho_b$ where $\rho_b$ is the cosmological background density, i.e.
= \_b ,
defines the edge $R$ of an object. However, one needs to carefully choose the correct overdensity $\Delta$ which is much higher for the OCBMond models due to the low $\Omega_0$ value. The parameters used are $\Delta=340$ for and $\Delta=2200$ for OCBMond [see @Gross97 Appendix C, and references therein]. [^3]
The Matter Field {#sec:matterfield}
----------------
{width="95.00000%"}
![Dark matter power spectrum of all simulations at redshifts $z=5$, $z=2$, and $z=0$.[]{data-label="fig:power_128"}](figures/power_128.eps){width="45.00000%"}
![Argument of the MONDian interpolation function $\mu(x)$ at redshift $z=0$ in the OCBMond2 model, i.e. the modulus of the MONDian force $|\nabla \Phi_M|$ normalized by $a^2g_0$. The values have been interpolated to the particle’s positions and are colour-coded according to the scale shown on the right. For values above 1 the particles are treated according to Newtonian physics whereas values below 1 indicate the MONDian regime.[]{data-label="fig:mondian_for_in_particles"}](figures/force_in_parts.eps){width=".45\textwidth"}
We start with inspecting the matter density field of all three runs in [Figure \[fig:density\_128\]]{}. There we can see that at redshift $z=0$ the differences amongst the models are rather small. However, there are major differences at larger redhifts due to the fact that the formation of structures under MOND kicks in later and then at an increased growth rate (i.e. $\delta \propto a^2$ in MOND as opposed to $\delta \propto a$ for Newtonian physics, e.g. @Sanders01 [@Nusser02; @Knebe04; @Sanders08]). But the more interesting observation is the comparison between our two MONDian implementations. There we can see some objects that are still approaching each other in OCBMond to have already merged in OCBMond2 indicative of an advanced evolutionary stage.
We quantify the evolutionary stage in [Figure \[fig:power\_128\]]{} where we present the matter power spectra at redshift $z=0$, $z=2$, and $z=5$. We basically recover the same features as reported by KG04 (even though they considered a rather different MOND model with $\gamma(a)=g_0$), namely the lack of a distinctive “break” due to the transfer of power from large to small scales in the MONDian runs and the (marginally) larger amplitude of power on scales $k\leq
1h$Mpc$^{-1}$ close to the fundamental mode. However, we also observe that OCBMond2 evolved marginally faster on large scale and at later times than OCBMond.
A rather natural question arises about the sites where MOND is actually affective. To shed some light on this issue we show in [Figure \[fig:mondian\_for\_in\_particles\]]{} the modulus of the MONDian force $\vecg_{M2}$ in the OCBMond2 model at the particle positions at redshift $z=0$ normalized by $a^2 g_0$ (which corresponds to the argument of the MONDian interpolation function used with [Eq. (\[eq:PoissonMOND\])]{}). We find that particles in low-density regions and the vicinity of objects, respectively, are in the MOND regime whereas particles residing at the centres of objects (i.e. high-density regions) are mostly unaffected by MOND. This may result in different (hierarchical?) structure formation scenarios as matter infall onto objects will most certainly be affected by the “MONDian environment” of objects. We will investigate this in the following Section.
Hierarchical Structure Formation {#sec:hierarchicalstructureformation}
--------------------------------
![Redshift evolution of the abundance of objects with (baryonic) mass $M_b>10^{11}$. Note that the baryonic mass for the model has been estimated by multiplying the dark matter mass by the baryonic fraction.[]{data-label="fig:abundance_128"}](figures/abundance_128.eps){width="45.00000%"}
![The “baryonic” masses $M_{b,0}$ of objects at today’s redshift versus their formation redshift $z_f$. The solid lines are best-fit power laws to the scatter plot with the exponent of the power law given in the upper right corner of each panel.[]{data-label="fig:M0_zf"}](figures/M0_zf.eps){width="35.00000%"}
![Two-point correlation function at redshift $z=0.0$ for the 1000 most massive objects. Error bars denote Poissonian error bars derived from the number of pairs in the respective distance bin.[]{data-label="fig:xi_128"}](figures/xi_128.eps){width="45.00000%"}
![The two-point correlation function for objects of different mass in OCBMond and OCBMond2. The considered mass range in the calculation of $\xi_{\rm gal}$ is given in the upper right corner of each panel. The error bars are the Poissonian errors again.[]{data-label="fig:xi_128_MOND12"}](figures/xi_128_MOND12.eps){width="45.00000%"}
As already noted in [Figure \[fig:density\_128\]]{} and \[fig:power\_128\] there appears to be a marginally faster evolution of (large-scale) structures in OCBMond2. This is further confirmed in [Figure \[fig:abundance\_128\]]{} where we show the abundance evolution of objects with mass $M>10^{11}$. At around redshift $z=1.5$ OCBMond2 starts to develop more objects. Anyways, the late onset and faster evolution of structure formation under MOND in general was already reported by @Sanders01, @Nusser02 and KG04. However, here we not only used a differnet MOND model but also revised the way of presenting the comparison between the two MONDian and the Newtonian runs. As OCBMond and OCBMond2 are simulations of the gravitational interactions of baryons whereas the model contains both baryonic and dark matter a fair comparision should correct for that. Or in other words, an object of mass $M$ in one of the MOND runs merely contains baryons whereas the corresponding object in contains both baryons and dark matter. As the idea of MOND is to replace dark matter by a modification to Newtonian dynamics we should “remove” the dark halo from the object when performing a cross-comparison. We therefore multiply the masses by the cosmic baryon fraction $f_b=\Omega_b/\Omega_0$ and refer to all masses as “baryonic mass” $M_b$ even though the interactions of baryons other than gravity are *not* modelled in the simulations presented in this study. We note that this is not necessarily correct as galaxies probably contain fewer baryons than given by the cosmic baryon fraction $f_b$ [e.g., @Gottloeber07; @Okamoto08]. Our “baryonic” masses are therefore considered an upper limit and are likely to be smaller.
By revising the mass of dark matter halos we note that the abundance evolution is similar yet different when comparing against the two MONDian models. Similar in a sense that the in KG04 advocated dramatic difference at high redshift is not as pronounced anymore. However, the actual shape of the Newtonian and MONDian curves are though rather different with a more gentle increase in the number of objects in (at least at redshifts smaller than $z\approx
2.5$).
To gain a better understanding of structure formation under MOND we constructed a merger tree for each individual object identified at redshift $z=0$. We then fitted the universal mass accretion history formula to the data [@Wechsler02]
\[eq:MAH\] M(z) = M\_[(z=0)]{} e\^[-z]{} .
Applying the half-mass criterion [e.g., @Tormen97] to the fits for obtaining the formation redshift (i.e. the formation redshift is implicitly defined via $0.5 = e^{-\alpha z_f}$)[^4] we are able to quantify hierarchical structure formation. We expect small objects to form first and then successively merge to form larger and larger entities [e.g., @Davis85]. This can be verfied in [Figure \[fig:M0\_zf\]]{} where we plot today’s mass against the formation redshift of that object. We note a clear hierarchical tendency even in both MOND models. To quantify differences we fitted a simple power law to the data
M\_[b,0]{} z\_f\^a
where the best fit $a$ is given in the upper right corner of the respective panel. We find that especially in OCBMond2 high-mass objects appear to form at earlier times than in . Note that this does not contradict the dearth of massive objects at high redshifts as observed in [Figure \[fig:abundance\_128\]]{}. Here we are tracing back individual objects whereas in [Figure \[fig:abundance\_128\]]{} we considered all objects above a given mass at a certain redshift; [Figure \[fig:M0\_zf\]]{} simply indicates that (some of) the high mass objects found at redshift $z=0$ must have already been in place at a higher redshift than in, for instance, . Surprisingly there is also a difference between OCBMond and OCBmond2 with the former being closer to . This highlights the relevance of the curl-field $\nabla\times
\vech$ introduced in [Eq. (\[eq:curl\])]{} for structure formation.
One of the findings of the study by KG04 was that the (formation) sites of MONDian objects are marginally more correlated. Can we vindicate that the two-point correlation function $\xi_{\rm gal}$ of MONDian objects (i.e. galaxies and hence the subscript ${\rm gal}$) has a larger amplitude (at least) on small scales. This can be verified in [Figure \[fig:xi\_128\]]{} where we plot $\xi_{\rm gal}(r)$ for the 1000 most massive objects in all three models. We confirm the finding of KG04 that OCBMond has a (marginally) larger amplitude than , especially on small scales. We further acknowledge that OCBMond2 has a substantially larger amplitude! In order to better gauge the orgin of the difference between OCBMond and OCBMond2 we split our objects up into different mass bins (i.e. $M_{\rm bin}^1 =
[10^{9}-10^{10}]$, $M_{\rm bin}^2 = [10^{10}-10^{11}]$, $M_{\rm bin}^3 = [10^{11}-10^{12}]$) and calculate $\xi_{\rm
gal}$ for each mass bin independently. The results can be viewed in [Figure \[fig:xi\_128\_MOND12\]]{}. We observe that the differences are due to the biased formation sites of high-mass objects. We like to mention that the number of objects in each mass bin is practically identical amongst OCBMond and OCBMond2; only in the range $10^{11}-10^{12}$ there are about 24% more objects in OCBMond2 as indicated by [Figure \[fig:abundance\_128\]]{}. We hence ascribe the bias between OCBMond and OCBMond2 as found in [Figure \[fig:xi\_128\]]{} to the large mass objects and hence the stronger evolution of large scales as already seen in [Figure \[fig:density\_128\]]{} and \[fig:power\_128\].
Cross-Correlation of Properties {#sec:crosscorrelation}
-------------------------------
![Ratio of masses for cross-identified objects at redshift $z=0$. The histograms represent the mean ratio in the respective bin. Note that the masses have been lowered by the baryonic fraction to be comparable to the MONDian values.[]{data-label="fig:MassMass_128"}](figures/MassMass_128.eps){width="45.00000%"}
![Ratio of triaxialities for cross-identified objects at redshift $z=0$. The histograms represent the mean ratio in the respective bin.[]{data-label="fig:TT_128"}](figures/TT_128.eps){width="45.00000%"}
Something not considered in the study of KG04 is the cross-correlation of individual objects. To this extent we use the tool `MergerTree` that comes with the distribution of the code [`AMIGA`]{} and serves the purpose of identifying corresponding objects either in the same simulation at different redshifts (and hence the name “MergerTree”) or in simulations of different cosmological models but run with the same initial phases for the initial conditions. The cross-correlation is done by linking objects that share the most common particles.
We start with the most simple yet still interesting quantify for our cross-comparison, namely the mass $M$. In [Figure \[fig:MassMass\_128\]]{} we show how $M_b$ correlates across and OCBMond (upper panel) as well as across OCBMond and OCBMond2 (lower panel). Remember that we defined $M_b$ as the “baryonic” mass of our halos that coincides with the actual total mass in the two MOND models but corresponds to $M_{\rm tot} \times f_b$ for ; by the usage of the cosmic baryon fraction $f_b = \Omega_b/\Omega_0$ in this formula we will have an upper limit for the “baryonic” mass [cf. @Gottloeber07; @Okamoto08]. Despite the “baryonic” correction we still observe a difference between the masses of “identical” objects in and the MONDian runs. This can in parts be ascribed to the use of the cosmic baryon fraction and in parts to the definition of the edge of objects: remember that we use $\Delta=340$ for as opposed to $\Delta=2200$ for MOND. The latter value translates into a smaller radius and hence less mass. When applying the same density threshold of $\Delta=340$ to the MONDian runs (not presented here though) the MONDian masses increase by approximately 30% bringing them into better (yet not perfect) agreement with the masses.
The other interesting observation in [Figure \[fig:MassMass\_128\]]{} is the fact that there is a systematical difference between the masses of cross-identified objects in OCBMond and OCBMond2. While the most massive objects appear to have identical masses, there is a clear trend for low-mass OCBMond2 objects to be more massive than their OCBMond counterparts. This difference flattens to values closer to unity when considering objects at higher redshift. This phenomenon can therefore be ascribed and explained by the even stronger evolution of the OCBMond2 simulation as already noticed in [Figure \[fig:density\_128\]]{} and [Figure \[fig:abundance\_128\]]{}, respectively. As pointed out by [Figure \[fig:mondian\_for\_in\_particles\]]{}, MOND is most affective in the outer regions of objects and hence leaving its imprint via differing infall patterns of material. We therefore ascribed the differences to variation in the mass accretion histories as confirmed by [Figure \[fig:M0\_zf\]]{}.
We close this Section with a brief investigation of the shape of objects as defined by, for instance, the triaxiality parameter [@Franx91]
\[eq:triaxiality\] T =
where $a>b>c$ are the principal axes of the moment of intertia tensor we note that there are hardly any differences at all. This can be verified in [Figure \[fig:TT\_128\]]{} where we plot for the same set of cross-identified halos as already used in [Figure \[fig:MassMass\_128\]]{} the ratio of the respective triaxialities as a function of mass again. This figure highlights that despite variations in the mass growth of objects at least their triaxialities are unaffected.
The curl field {#sec:curlfield}
--------------
![Sketch illustrating the vectors of [Eq. (\[eq:curl\_field\])]{} and the angles between them. $\vecg_N$ is the Newtonian force vector, $\vecg_M$ the one used with the OCBMond model, and $\vecg_{M2}$ the solution of our new solver responsbile to the evolution of the OCBMond2 model.[]{data-label="fig:vectors_figure"}](figures/vectors_figure.eps){width=".45\textwidth"}
![Slice of thickness 125 of the OCBMond2 simulation at redshift $z=0$. The slice is chosen to contain a strong density peak (i.e. it is centred about the position of the most massive object found in th simulation). The upper panel shows the density as obtained on a regular 256$^3$ grid. The same grid is used to calculate the modulus of the curl field normalized by the modulus of the Newtonian force, i.e. $|\nabla \times
\vech|/|\vecg_N|$, which is presented in the lower panel.[]{data-label="fig:curl_maps"}](figures/curl_256_z0.000.eps){width=".45\textwidth"}
![Probability distribution of the angle between the curl-field $\nabla\times\vech$ and the Newtonian force $\vecg_N$ (upper panel) and the fractional difference between these two values (lower panel) at various redshifts.[]{data-label="fig:curl_vs_newt"}](figures/curl_vs_newt.histo.eps){width=".45\textwidth"}
![Probability distribution of the angle between the MONDian forces $\vecg_M$ and $\vecg_{M2}$ (upper panel) and the fractional difference between these two values (lower panel) at various redshifts.[]{data-label="fig:mond_vs_mond2"}](figures/mond_vs_mond2.histo.eps){width=".45\textwidth"}
![Projection of a sub-box of side length $1.5$ at redshift $z=0$. The left plot shows a colour-representation of $\cos{(\vecg_M,\vecg_{M2})}$ whereas the right plot shows the density field. Both values are evaluated at the particles’ positions. Note that both figures are centred on the same point.[]{data-label="fig:crazy_forces"}](figures/cos_in_parts.eps){width=".5\textwidth"}
As we have just seen there are subtle yet noticable differences when using our novel Poisson solver for the MONDian equation (\[eq:PoissonMOND\]) as oppossed to the simplified prescription of inverting [Eq. (\[eq:curl\])]{} under the assumption of $\mathbf C=\mathbf 0$. In that regards it appears mandatory to study the origin of these devations. We therefore present in this Section a detailed investigation of the curl-field $\nabla \times \vech$ and its effects upon structure formation.
Given the solution of the [Eq. (\[eq:PoissonNewton\])]{} and [Eq. (\[eq:PoissonMOND\])]{} the curl-field is readily calculated
\[eq:curl\_field\] **h** = - \_N.
Note that setting $\nabla\times\vech=0$ corresponds to the OCBMond model.
In order to clarify all definitions and terminology to be used from now on we show in [Figure \[fig:vectors\_figure\]]{} a sketch of all the vectors $\vecg_N=-\nabla \Phi_N$, $\vecg_M=-\nabla\Phi_M$, and $\vecg_{M2}=-\nabla\Phi_{M2}$ in play. The assumptions used with the OCBMond model imply that the forces there and the Newtonian forces, $\vecg_M$ and $\vecg_N$, are parallel whereas they both can have an angle $\alpha$ with the OCBMond2 force vector $\vecg_{M2}$. This angle is due to the influence of the curl-field and can be described by the angle $\beta$ (cf. [Eq. (\[eq:curl\_field\])]{}).
Interpreting the curl-field as a modification to $\mathbf g_N$ on the right-hand side of [Eq. (\[eq:curl\])]{} the question arises about the actual adjustment to (the implicitly defined) $\vecg_{M2}$ stemming from this additional “source” term. We therefore normalize $\vecC$ by the Newtonian acceleration $\vecg_N$ and study its spatial dependence. This can be viewed in [Figure \[fig:curl\_maps\]]{} where we show $|\vecC|/|\vecg_N|$ (lower panel) in a slice of thickness 125 in the OCBMond2 simulation as calculated on a 256$^3$ grid. We do observe a marginal correlation of the “correction to the source” with the actual matter density shown in the upper panel. We further note that the modulus of the curl-field is actually always smaller than the Newtonian force, however, its spatial variation is though highly non-trivial. In some (high-density) regions there appear to be some kind of “shocks” where the curl-field changes dramatically changes its value. The only conclusion we can draw from this qualitative analysis is that the curl-field has an influence primarily in low-density regions: its value is close to the Newtonian force in the void regions. Finally we like to remark on the “diamond shapes” seen in [Figure \[fig:curl\_maps\]]{}; they are an artifact of the periodic boundary conditions and stem from the periodic images of the largest object/void. These attracting images create the observed symmetry leading to the diamond shapes.
In order to make a more quantitative analysis of the curl-field, we use the snapshots of the simulation OCBMond2 and calculate the Newtonian as well as the two MONDian forces at various redshifts. These forces are then extrapolated to the particle positions in the same way as done during the time integration of [Eq. (\[eq:eom\])]{}. We are aware that this extrapolation will bias our results towards high-density regions (where the particles actually reside) and ignore the effects-of-interest in low-density regions, respectively. However, our integration scheme is based upon the idea of sampling phase-space with particles and hence the *forces at the particle positions* are relevant for the time integration of [Eq. (\[eq:eom\])]{} and hence the evolution of the simulation.
In [Figure \[fig:curl\_vs\_newt\]]{} we now present a quantitative comparison of the curl field, ${\rm curl}=\nabla\times\vech$, and the Newtonian forces $\vecg_N$ by plotting the probability distribution of the angle between the two vectors (upper panel) as well as the relative difference of the modulus (lower panel). First, we note that there is practically no evolution with redshift. Second, the curl-field is well aligned with the Newtonian force though it may also point in the opposite direction! In order to emphasize the skewness of the distribution about $\cos{({\rm curl}, \vecg_n)} = 0$ we show the modulus of it. The upper curves thereby correspond to $\cos{({\rm
curl}, \vecg_n)} < 0$, i.e. it is more likely that the curl points in the opposite direction. However, the lower panel of [Figure \[fig:curl\_vs\_newt\]]{} indicates that the actual change to the “source” term for the implicitly defined $\vecg_{M2}$ (cf. [Eq. (\[eq:curl\])]{}) induced by the curl is rather small. Here we show the fractional difference between the moduli of the curl and the Newtonian force vector. This distribution peaks at approximately $-0.9$ and hence a $\approx$10% correction to $\vecg_N$ in [Eq. (\[eq:curl\])]{}; this modification is again independent of redshift. So, the net effect of the curl field is to reduce the “source” on the right hand side of [Eq. (\[eq:curl\])]{}. We expect this to translate into a reduction of $\vecg_{M2}$ with respect to $\vecg_M$, too.
But because of the implicit definition and the vector-nature of the quantities involved in the calculation of $\vecg_{M2}$ it is difficult to make predictions for the change in $\vecg_{M2}$ induced by the modifications to the “source” in [Eq. (\[eq:curl\])]{}. We therefore plot in [Figure \[fig:mond\_vs\_mond2\]]{} the analogous quantities as in [Figure \[fig:curl\_vs\_newt\]]{} this time for the comparison of $\vecg_M$ and $\vecg_{M2}$; this should reveal the effects of the curl-field directly. As the angle distribution is no longer symmetric we expand it over the whole range from $\cos{(\vecg_M,\vecg_{M2})} \in
[-1,+1]$. The upper panel (showing the angle distribution) clearly indicates that both MONDian forces are *well* aligned (note the logarithmic scale on the $y$-axis). The lower panel (showing the fractional difference between $\vecg_M$ and $\vecg_{M2}$) proofs what we already expected: the distribution is centered about $0$ but shows a skewness towards values of stronger $\vecg_M$ and lower $\vecg_{M2}$, respectively. This skewness is a manifestation of the result obsvered in [Figure \[fig:curl\_vs\_newt\]]{}, namely that the curl preferentially decreases the “source” in [Eq. (\[eq:curl\])]{}.
We further note in [Figure \[fig:mond\_vs\_mond2\]]{} that there is a marginal redshift evolution of the peak in the distribution of the fractional differences of the two MONDian forces. The peak gradually migrates away from $0$ at redshift $z=5$ towards more negative values of approximately $-0.09$ at $z=0$. While it appears counter-intuative to explain the advanced structure formation in OCBMond2 found in previous Sections (cf. [Figure \[fig:density\_128\]]{}, [Figure \[fig:power\_128\]]{}, [Figure \[fig:abundance\_128\]]{}, etc.) with the finding that the forces are smaller in that model, we rather believe that the shift in the peak can be held responsible for it. This shift towards negative values translates into *stronger OCBMond2* forces and hence structure formation at an accelerated speed.
As an illustrative example of the misalignment between the two MONDian forces (and its relation to the underlying density field) we show in [Figure \[fig:crazy\_forces\]]{} both the (colour-coded) cosine of the angle between $\vecg_M$ and $\vecg_{M2}$ (left panel) alongside the density at the particles’ positions at redshift $z=0$. We note that there is no apparant correlation of the misalignment with density.
Summary & Conclusions {#sec:conclusions}
=====================
We presented a novel solver for the analogue to Poisson’s equation taking into account the effects of modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND). This equation is a highly non-linear partial differential equation for which standard solvers based upon Fourier transformation techniques and/or tree structures are not applicable anymore; one has to defer to multi-grid relaxation techniques [e.g., @Brandt77; @Press92; @Knebe01] in order to numerically solve it.
The major part of this paper hence deals with the necessary (non-trivial) adaptions to the existing multi-grid relaxation solver [`AMIGA`]{} (successor to [`MLAPM`]{} introduced by @Knebe01). We show that the accuracy of our MOND solver is at a credible level for a static problem with known MONDian solution and that it reproduces correct results in the Newtonian limit for cosmological simulations.
In the case that we don’t want to adhere to any (undjustifyable and hence ad-hoc) assumptions as, for instance, done by KG04, we are facing the problem that there is still a lot of freedom from the covariant point of view to describe the original phenomenological MOND theory. To be able to actually perform MONDian cosmological simulations we decided to choose one particular model for MOND and to leave for later studies the analysis of the effects that differents theories producces on the structure formation. One of the suppositions KG04 made relates to the relation between the MONDian and the Newtonian force vector. They use the rather simple relation as given by setting $\mathbf C=\mathbf 0$ in [Eq. (\[eq:curl\])]{} making the right-hand side simply the Newtonian force. This implicit definition for $\vecg_M$ could be inverted and used instead of $\vecg_N$ when updating the particles’ velocities during the time integration of [Eq. (\[eq:eom\])]{}. As noted in [Eq. (\[eq:curl\])]{} they neglected the so-called MONDian curl-field $\mathbf C=\nabla \times \mathbf h$. Others have shown that this field decreases like $O(r^{-3})$ and vanishes for any kind of symmetry [@Bekenstein84], it yet remains unclear whether it will leave any imprint on inhomogeneous strucure formation as found in cosmological simulations.
In the second part of this paper we therefore presented a series of cosmological simulations set out to quantify both structure formation under MOND as well as the effects of the curl-field. Surprisingly, we found that our results are consistent with KG04 even if we take in account that they use a different MOND model and initial conditions generated with standard linear theory in a MONDian regimen. We revised some of their findings (mainly the discrepancy between the abundance of galaxies at galaxies at high redshift between and OCBMond) and noted that the curl-field leaves marginal yet noticable effects. The major result of this study though is that the curl-field appears to drive structure formation! Our results obtained with the new solver (and hence including the effects of the curl-field) can be summarized as follows
- the curl-field drives structure formation,
- the curl-field leads to more objects at $z=0$ where
- cross-identified objects are more massive in OCBMond2 than in OCBMond, and
- the OCBMond2 model shows a stronger two-point correlation function.
We acknowledge that there are still a lot of puzzling results to be investigated in greater detail. However, we postpone this to future studies. The aim of this paper was primarily to describe the novel gravity solver that is freely available for download.[^5]
Acknowledgements {#acknowledgements .unnumbered}
================
CLL and AK acknowledge funding by the DFG under grant KN 755/2. AK further acknowledges funding through the Emmy Noether programme of the DFG (KN 755/1). CLL is gratefull to Xufen Wu for her support during the testing phase of the code. The simulations and analysis were carried out on the AIP’s supercomputing cluster.
\[lastpage\]
[^1]: Note that running along the 3-dimensional diagonal will coincide with the largest possible error and hence the solid line in the upper panel of [Figure \[fig:hernquist\_errors\]]{} marks the upper boundary of the error in the potential.
[^2]: [`AHF`]{} is the successor of [`MHF`]{} introduced in @Gill04a.
[^3]: Note that $\Delta$ depends both on redshift and cosmology.
[^4]: Even though we stored 26 snapshots between redshifts $z=0$ and $z=5$ for each model we prefer to use the fitted mass accretion history as it will provide us with a more precise estimate for the formation time.
[^5]: [`AMIGA`]{} can be downloaded from the following web page `http://www.aip.de/People/aknebe/AMIGA`. The new MOND solver can be switched on via the compilation flag `-DMOND2`. The code is able to run cosmological simulations, ie with expansion and periodic boundary conditions and to work also in isolation, wich implies no expansion and fixed boundary conditions. It can be also use without temporal evolution in order to get 3D potentials from density distributions given by particles or analitic formulas. Please contact the authors for more details.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'Contextual representation models have achieved great success in improving various downstream tasks. However, these language-model-based encoders are difficult to train due to the large parameter sizes and high computational complexity. By carefully examining the training procedure, we find that the softmax layer (the output layer) causes significant inefficiency due to the large vocabulary size. Therefore, we redesign the learning objective and propose an efficient framework for training contextual representation models. Specifically, the proposed approach bypasses the softmax layer by performing language modeling with dimension reduction, and allows the models to leverage pre-trained word embeddings. Our framework reduces the time spent on the output layer to a negligible level, eliminates almost all the trainable parameters of the softmax layer and performs language modeling without truncating the vocabulary. When applied to ELMo, our method achieves a 4 times speedup and eliminates 80% trainable parameters while achieving competitive performance on downstream tasks.'
author:
- |
Liunian Harold Li$^\dagger$, Patrick H. Chen$^*$, Cho-Jui Hsieh$^*$, Kai-Wei Chang$^*$\
$^\dagger$Peking University\
$^*$University of California, Los Angeles\
`[email protected], [email protected]`\
`{chohsieh, kwchang}@cs.ucla.edu`\
bibliography:
- 'tacl2018.bib'
title: Efficient Contextual Representation Learning Without Softmax Layer
---
Introduction
============
In recent years, text representation learning approaches, such as ELMo [@elmo], GPT-1 [@GPT], BERT [@bert] and GPT-2 [@GPT2], have been developed to provide generic contextual representations for the natural language, which have led to large improvements to various downstream tasks. The key idea underneath is to train a contextual encoder with a language model objective on a large unannotated text corpus. During the training, part of the text is masked and the goal is to encode the remaining context and predict the missing part. Specifically, given a corpus with vocabulary size $V$, the model consists of two parts: 1) an encoder is learned to embed the context and output an $m$-dimensional vector, and 2) the output vector goes through a softmax layer, where it is multiplied by an embedding matrix $\bm{W} \in \mathcal{R}^{V\times m}$ and is fed into a softmax function, to produce a conditional distribution of the missing word. The encoders trained in such a way are able to capture generic contextual information of the input text and have been used in a variety of benchmark tasks to establish state-of-the-art results.
However, training contextual representations is known to be a resource-hungry process. For example, ELMo was reported to take about two weeks to train on a one-billion-token corpus with a vocabulary of 800,000 words using three GPUs[^1]. This slow training procedure hinders the development cycle, prevents fine-grained parameter tuning, and makes training contextual representations inaccessible to a broader community. More importantly, the success of these models stems from the large amount of data they used. It is challenging, if not impossible, to train a contextual representation model on a larger corpus with tens or hundreds of billions of tokens.
In this work, we explore how to accelerate contextual representation learning. We target the softmax layer as the major cause of inefficiency. This component takes up a huge portion of all trainable parameters (80% for ELMo) and consumes a huge amount of training time. However, this layer will be discarded in the final model as the goal of contextual representation learning is to build a generic encoder. Therefore, it is rather a waste to allocate extensive computational resources to the softmax layer to obtain the best prediction of masked words. As mentioned, language modeling can be viewed as predicting the missing words based on a context vector generated by the contextual encoder and an embedding matrix $\bm{W}$ for target words [@tie_embedding; @tie_embedding_2]. Learning the contextual encoder is difficult while learning word representation has been extensively studied [@word2vec]. It is natural to use a pre-trained word embedding to replace $\bm{W}$ and thus decouple learning contexts and words.
In this paper, we propose an efficient framework to learn the contextual encoder by leveraging pre-trained word embeddings[^2]. Instead of using a softmax layer to predict the distribution of the missing word, we utilize and extend the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer [@kumar2018mises] to predict the embedding of the missing word. In the training process, the contextual encoder is learned by minimizing the distance between its output and a pre-trained target word embedding. The [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer, with constant time complexity and small memory footprint, perfectly serves our desire to decouple learning contexts and words and devote most computational resources to the contextual encoder. Our contributions are as follows:
We introduce the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer into contextual representation learning and further improve it with open-vocabulary word embeddings. The resulting model is computationally efficient and can be trained with an untruncated vocabulary. (Section \[sec:apprach\])
We discuss the global objective of the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer and draw a connection to dimension reduction. We show that the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer is particularly suitable for contextual representation learning. (Section \[sec:semfit\])
We empirically show that our approach significantly reduces the training time of ELMo, while maintaining competitive performance on most of the end tasks. (Section \[Experiment\])
We conduct a thorough analysis of our approach, discussing different modeling choices and computational efficiency. We also analyze the subword language model, a strong baseline used in GPT and BERT to circumvent the problem of large vocabulary. (Section \[Analysis\])
Related Work {#sec:relatedwork}
============
#### Contextual Representation
We review recently proposed contextual representation models from two aspects: how they are trained and how these pre-trained models are used in downstream tasks.
CoVe [@cove] trained a machine translation model, and used the source language encoder as a contextual representation model for other downstream tasks. As large in-domain parallel corpus is hard to obtain, the potential of CoVe is limited. In contrast, a few recent approaches learn contextual encoder on unannotated corpus with language model objectives. ELMo [@elmo] concatenated a forward and a backward LSTM-based language model while GPT-1 [@GPT] and GPT-2 [@GPT2] used unidirectional transformer-based language models. BERT [@bert] introduced masked language models and provided deep bidirectional representation.
There are mainly two existing strategies for applying pre-trained contextual representations to downstream tasks: 1) *feature-based* and 2) *fine-tuning*. For the *feature-based* approach (e.g., ELMo, CoVe), fixed features are extracted from the contextual encoder and inserted into task-specific architectures. In the *fine-tuning* approach (e.g., BERT, GPT-1), the contextual encoder is designed as a part of the network architecture for downstream tasks, and its parameters are fine-tuned with downstream task data. BERT was designed for the *fine-tuning* approach but it was also evaluated with the *feature-based* approach. GPT-2 is a scaled-up version of GPT-1 and exhibits strong performance under zero-shot settings.
#### The Large Vocabulary Issue
The large and ever-growing vocabulary has been considered an obstacle to scaling up language models. We review existing solutions to this issue from both the language modeling and contextual representation literature.
Most studies for language modeling focus on directly reducing the complexity of the softmax layer. Following , we roughly group them into two categories: sampling-based approximations and structural approximations. Sampling-based approximations include the sampled softmax [@sampled_softmax] and NCE [@NCE]. The sampled softmax approximates the normalization term of softmax by sampling a subset of negative targets, while NCE replaces the softmax with a binary classifier. On the other hand, structural approximations such as the hierarchical softmax [@Hierachical_Softmax] and the adaptive softmax [@adaptive_softmax], form a structural hierarchy to avoid expensive normalization. The adaptive softmax, in particular, group words in the vocabulary into either a short-list or clusters of rare words. For frequent words, a softmax over the short-list would suffice, which reduces computation and memory usage significantly. The adaptive softmax has been shown to achieve results close to that of the full softmax whilst maintaining high GPU efficiency [@Merity2018LMScale].
Regarding contextual representation models, ELMo used the sampled softmax while GPT and BERT resorted to subword methods. Specifically, they used WordPiece [@google_wordpiece] or BPE [@subword] to split the words into subwords and the language models were trained to consume and predict these subwords. This method is efficient and scalable, as the subword vocabulary can be kept small. Language models trained in this way are neither strictly *word-level* nor *character-level*. Hence we categorize them as *subword-level* language models. One potential drawback, however, is that these models produce representations for fragments of words, and it takes extra efforts to generate word-level representations from them. In this paper, we focus on *word-level* language models and we will discuss *subword-level* language models in Section \[Exp:Subword\].
Approach {#sec:apprach}
========
In this section, we illustrate our approach to accelerating the training process of contextual representation models, where the goal is to build a generic contextual encoder.
We first review the procedure for learning a contextual encoder. Given a sequence of words $\{w_1, w_2, \dots, w_n\}$, the encoder seeks to form a rich contextual representation for every word based on their surrounding words, i.e. the context. An input layer, which is usually a word embedding or a character-CNN [@kim2016cnn], produces a context-insensitive word representation $\bm{x_i^0}$ for word $w_i$. Then, $\bm{x_i^0}$ goes through a K-layer contextualizing structure, such as LSTM [@hochreiter1997lstm], Gated CNN [@GatedCNN], or Transformer [@Transformer]. Each layer outputs a context-dependent vector $\bm{x_i^k} (k = 1, \dots ,K)$[^3]. The top layer’s output $\bm{x_i^K}$ is the final output of the encoder. Notice that when using this contextual encoder in downstream tasks, recent methods have gone beyond simply using the top layer output. They either combine different layers’ outputs $\bm{x_i^k}$ to obtain hierarchical representation (ELMo) or fine-tune the whole encoder (GPT). To avoid confusion, we refer to the contextual information captured by the encoder as the **contextual representation**. We denote the top layer’s output vectors $\bm{x_i^K}$ as $\bm{c_i}$ and refer to it as the **context vector**.
Training the contextual encoder involves embedding a context $c$ into a context vector $\bm{c}$ and using it to predict a missing word[^4]. The conventional way is to attach a softmax layer to the contextual encoder. The softmax layer multiplies $\bm{c}$ with an embedding matrix $\bm{W} \in \mathcal{R}^{V \times m}$ and then uses a softmax function to produce a conditional distribution over the vocabulary. Suppose the target word is $w$ and the context is $c$, the learning objective $l(c,w)$ for each instance is maximizing the negative log-likelihood of $w$ under $c$: $$\begin{aligned}
l(c,w) & = &- \log p(w|c) \nonumber \\
& = &- \log softmax(\bm{cW^{T}}) \nonumber \\
& = & - \bm{c} \cdot \bm{w} + \log\sum\nolimits_{w'}{\exp{\bm{c} \cdot \bm{w'}}} \label{Eq:LMObj}\end{aligned}$$ $\bm{w} \in \mathcal{R}^{m}$ is a row from $\bm{W}$ corresponding to $w$ and the second term sums over the vocabulary. $V$ is the size of the vocabulary while $m \ll V$ is the size of the context vector. The overall learning objective is $$\mathcal{L} = \sum\nolimits_{(c,w)} \#(c,w) l(c,w)$$ where $\#(c,w)$ is the number of occurrences of the pair $(c,w)$ in the corpus. Note that the size of $W$ and the computational complexity of the normalization term (the second term in Eq. ) scale linearly to the vocabulary size. Therefore, when the vocabulary size is large, the vanilla softmax layer becomes the bottleneck. Many approaches (Section \[sec:relatedwork\]) have been proposed to address this issue, but we think there is still room for improvement.
We accelerates the training by replacing the softmax layer with a [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer. Instead of maximizing the log-likelihood, after embedding the context into $\bm{c}$, we directly minimize the distance between the context vector $\bm{c}$ and a **target word embedding** $\bm{w}$, $$l(c,w) = d(\bm{c}, \bm{w}).$$ Notice that the target word embedding $\bm{w}$ is pre-trained and fixed. The distance function $d$ could be the L2 distance, cosine distance or some probabilistic distance metrics (see discussions in Section \[sec:semfit\]). For the rest of this section, we will discuss the advantages of the proposed approach in contextual representation learning.
Computational Efficiency {#subsec:computational_efficiency}
------------------------
We analyze the computational efficiency of the proposed approach against existing acceleration approaches for the softmax layer. In particular, we discuss the sampled softmax and the adaptive softmax, both being popular choices for speeding up softmax [@limitslm; @adaptive_softmax; @Merity2018LMScale].
#### Computational Time Complexity
In the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer, we only need to calculate the distance between two $m$-dimensional vectors. Without the normalization term or the need to sample words, the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer has $O(1)$ time complexity, which grants scalability with respect to the vocabulary size. The time spent on the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer remains constant and negligible regardless of the vocabulary size. In comparison, the time complexity of the sampled softmax is proportional to the number of negative samples per batch. When the vocabulary is huge, a large number of negative samples are needed [@limitslm]. For the adaptive softmax, the time complexity is determined by the capacities of the short-list and rare-word clusters, which grows sub-linearly with respect to the vocabulary size.
#### Trainable Parameter Size
The softmax layer takes up a huge part of the parameters of a language model. Here, we list the parameter sizes of models reported in the literature trained on the One Billion Word Benchmark [@OneBillionWord], which is also the corpus ELMo was trained on. For ELMo, the character-CNN and LSTM have about 100 million parameters while the softmax layer has 400 million parameters. For the bigLSTM in , the softmax takes up 840 million parameters, while all other parts have 182 million parameters. These models used the sampled softmax, which is only designed to accelerate calculating the normalization term and does not reduce the trainable parameter size. The adaptive softmax proposes to reduce $m$ for rare words. The trainable parameter size is effectively reduced but still remains sizable. For a model trained on the same corpus [@adaptive_softmax], the LSTM has around 50 million parameters while the adaptive softmax still amounts to 240 million parameters. Our approach, on the other hand, uses a pre-trained word embedding, reducing the trainable parameters of the output layer from hundreds of millions to almost zero.
#### GPU Memory Efficiency
Our approach exhibits exceptional GPU memory efficiency, due to reductions of the computational time complexity (with fewer intermediate results to keep) and trainable parameter size (with fewer parameters to store[^5]). As a result, compared to the adaptive softmax, models with our technique are 2 to 5 times more memory efficient (Section \[Exp:DetailedEfficiency\]). The memory efficiency further adds up to the speed advantage, because loading more words in each batch allows better parallelism when utilizing GPUs.
#### Scalability Across GPUs
To scale up modern deep learning systems, frameworks are designed to train models with synchronous SGD with very large batch size and consequently a large number of GPUs [@KaimingImagenetOneHour; @ImagenetInMinuetes]. However, the overhead of running on multiple GPUs is the communication cost spent on synchronizing the parameters and their gradients across machines, which is proportional to the size of parameters that need to be updated. For the sampled softmax, due to the use of the sparse gradient, the communication cost is proportional to the number of the sampled words. For the adaptive softmax, since full softmax is still used within the short-list and each cluster, the sparse gradient trick is not available and the communication cost is proportional to the trainable parameter size. The [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer, on the other hand, incurs little communication cost, making it more efficient to train models on multiple GPUs.
#### Easily-accessible Word Embedding
With all these computational advantages, the only prerequisite for the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer is a pre-trained word embedding. Fortunately, learning word embeddings is much cheaper than learning contextual representations. For example, training a FastText embedding [@fasttext] on the One Billion Word Benchmark took merely two hours on an average CPU machine. Moreover, several existing word embeddings trained on large corpora in different domains are publicly available.
Open-vocabulary Word Embedding
------------------------------
Theoretically, we can use any pre-trained word representation as the target word embedding for the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer. We exploit a particular kind of word representation, the open-vocabulary word embedding, such as the FastText embedding and the <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">mimick</span> model [@mimick]. These embeddings utilize character or subword information to provide embedding for out-of-vocabulary (OOV) words. Combining the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer with open-vocabulary embedding, we can train contextual encoders with untruncated vocabulary while making substantial simplifications to the input layer.
#### Scalable Word Representation
In the vanilla softmax, a simple $V$-by-$m$ matrix $\bm{W}$ is used to provide word representation. However, when we further scale up current language models, the parameter size of this matrix could become intractable. The adaptive softmax proposes to reduce $m$ for rare words such that the parameter size grows only sub-linearly. Here, we take another route and propose to utilize the open-vocabulary word embedding, which could represent an unlimited number of words with a fixed number of parameters, providing the much-needed scalability.
#### Learning with An Untruncated Vocabulary
Combining the $O(1)$ time complexity and scalable word representation, we can conduct training with an untruncated vocabulary. Softmax-based methods keep a vocabulary to calculate the normalization term. With the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer, we only need the target word embedding and the context vector to conduct training. There is no need for truncating the vocabulary or keeping one because we could use multi-process to dynamically prepare the embedding.
According to , the ability to model rare words is an essential advantage of the neural models against N-gram models. Now with an untruncated vocabulary, we possess the power to model unlimited rare words. This feature is especially attractive if we are training on domains or languages with a long tail, for example, the biomedical domain where truncating the vocabulary may not be acceptable.
#### Open-vocabulary Input Layer
To be easily applied in various tasks, the contextual encoder usually has an open-vocabulary input layer. ELMo used a character-CNN but it is relatively slow. Thus we propose to reuse the pre-trained open-vocabulary word embedding as the input layer of the contextual encoder, reducing the time complexity of the input layer to $O(1)$. This also aligns with the main spirit of our approach, which is to spend computational resources on the most important part, the contextualizing structure like LSTM.
The [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} Layer {#sec:semfit}
==================================================================
Though the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer is intuitive, its properties are less known. In this section, we provide an analysis on the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer, extending the work of . We investigate the global objective of different distance functions and link the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer to probabilistic language modeling and dimension reduction, which further justifies the intuition behind the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer. Finally, we discuss why the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer is particularly suited for contextual representation learning.
Global Objective {#subsec:GlobalObjective}
----------------
Recall that the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer minimizes the distance between the context vector $\bm{c}$ and the target word embedding $\bm{w}$, $ l = d(\bm{c}, \bm{w})$. There are several choices regarding the distance function $d$. We investigate these losses with different distance functions from [^6]:
L2: $(\bm{{c}} - \bm{{w}})^2$
Cosine: $-{\bm{\bar{c}} \cdot \bm{{w}}} $
NLLvMF: $ -\log C_m(\|\bm{c}\|) -
\lambda_2 \bm{{c}} \cdot \bm{{w}} + \lambda_1 \|\bm{c}\| $
Although the above losses have different interpretations, we find that they are similar. Specifically, we can rewrite the global objective in an uniform way[^7]: [$$\begin{aligned}
& \mathcal{L} = \sum_{(c, w)} \#(c, w) (-\lambda \bm{\tilde{c}} \cdot \bm{{w}} + f(\|\bm{\tilde{c}}\|)) \\
& = -\lambda \sum_{c} \bm{\tilde{c}} \cdot\sum_{w}\#(c, w) \bm{{w}} + \sum_{(c,w)}\#(c, w)f(\|\bm{\tilde{c}}\|) \\
& = -\lambda \sum_{c} \#(c)\bm{\tilde{c}}\! \cdot\! \sum_{w} p(w|c) \bm{w} \!+\! \sum_{(c,w)}\!\#(c, w)\!f(\|\bm{\tilde{c}}\|) \\
\end{aligned}$$ ]{}
The first term minimizes the inner-product between the contextual encoder output and the target embedding, and the second term adds different constraints on the encoder output’s norm. Although for different losses the norm of the optimal $\bm{c}$ might be different, the direction of the optimal $\bm{c}$ should be the same as $\Sigma_{w} p(w|c) \bm{w}$. Simply put, the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer models the weighted average word embedding under a context.
Dimension Reduction {#subsec:DimensionReduction}
-------------------
We seek to justify the very idea of the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer. We want to answer why minimizing the distance between the encoder output and the target word embedding should work.
We first show that the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer is essentially performing language modeling after dimension reduction. Following and , language modeling can be viewed as modeling a conditional probability matrix $\bm{P} \in \mathcal{R}^{N \times V}$, where $N$ is the number of all possible contexts and $V$ is the vocabulary size. Each row of $\bm{P}$ corresponds to the conditional distribution of the word under a certain context. Softmax-based methods seek to find a $\bm{C} \in \mathcal{R}^{N \times m}$ and $\bm{W} \in \mathcal{R}^{V \times m}$, such that $softmax(\bm{C}\bm{W^{T}})$ best approximates $\bm{P}$. For the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} Layer, we are modeling $\Sigma_{w} p(w|c) \bm{w}$, which translates to $\bm{P}\bm{W}$ in the matrix form. $\bm{W}$ is pre-trained and fixed. We are essentially conducting “multivariate regression” on $\bm{P}$ after dimension reduction with $\bm{W}$ as the projection matrix.
So the question becomes, what matrix serves as a good projection matrix and why a pre-trained word embedding would be a good choice? When doing dimension reduction, we either strive to preserve the most variance (PCA) [@PCA] or achieve the least reconstruction error (SVD) [@SVD]. Suppose we have access to $\bm{P}$, we could easily perform PCA or SVD. Concretely, one could perform SVD on $\bm{M} \in \mathcal{R}^{N \times V}$, and get $ \bm{M_m} = \bm{U_m} \bm{\Sigma_m} \bm{V_m^T},$ where $\bm{U_m} \in \mathcal{R}^{N \times m}$, $\bm{\Sigma_m} \in \mathcal{R}^{m \times m}$ and $\bm{V_m} \in \mathcal{R}^{V \times m}$. In PCA, $\bm{M}$ is centered $\bm{P}$ and in SVD, $\bm{M}$ is the raw $\bm{P}$. $\bm{M_m}$ is the matrix of rank $m$ that best approximates the original matrix $\bm{M}$. $\bm{V_m^T}$ is the optimal projection matrix $\bm{W}$ in either case. In practice, though we could not get the full $\bm{P}$, we could use a simplified definition of context and get an approximated $\bm{P}$.
Interestingly, using a simplified definition of context is a common practice in learning word embedding [@levy2014neural]. SVD is also a recognized method to construct word embedding. When $\bm{M}$ is the PMI matrix or the conditional probability matrix, $ (\bm{\Sigma_d})^\alpha \bm{V_d}$ serves as a good word embedding [@levy2014neural], where $\alpha \in [0, 1]$ is a tunable parameter.
This finding shows that there exists a natural link between the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer and SVD word embedding. Moreover, we could intuitively see that other kinds of word embedding might also serve well as the projection matrix $\bm{W}$. Suppose we want to preserve the variance of $\bm{P}$ in the spirit of PCA. If two contexts have very different conditional distribution, then $\Sigma_{w} p(w|c) \bm{\tilde{w}}$ for these two contexts should have very different directions, assuming that dissimilar words have dissimilar word vectors. Thus, a pre-trained word embedding might help us preserve much of the variance.
Decoding Algorithm {#subsec:DecodingAlgorithm}
------------------
The above analysis strengthens our argument that the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer especially suits contextual representation learning. To illustrate, one could see that the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer may not excel at predicting the next word, which in theory is determined by its ability to approximate $\bm{P}$. The [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer models $\bm{PW}$, and unless we get the optimal $\bm{W}$, it is hard to get an approximated $\bm{P}$ from $\bm{PW}$; therefore, we cannot calculate perplexity from the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer. This could cause problems to tasks like machine translation or text generation where the ability to predict the next word is essential. For contextual representation, there exists no such problem as we do not seek to induce $\bm{P}$.
As a way to predict the next word with the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer, proposed to search for the nearest neighbor of the context vector $\bm{c}$ in the target embedding space $\bm{W}$. This decoding algorithm is sub-optimal unless the distribution of $p(w|c)$ is sharp. Suppose our training resulted in the global optimum, finding the nearest neighbor of $\bm{c}$ is equivalent to finding the word vector with the largest inner product with $\bm{p(w|c)}\bm{W}$[^8]. For a specific word $w_0$, its inner product $$\begin{aligned}
d_{w_0} & = & \bm{c_{optim}} \cdot \bm{w_0} \nonumber \\
& \propto & \bm{p(w|c)}\bm{W} \cdot \bm{w_0} \nonumber \\
& = & p(w_0|c) + \Sigma_{w'\neq w_0} p(w'|c) \bm{w}' \cdot \bm{w_0} \quad \label{equation:dot}\end{aligned}$$ $d_{w_0}$ is influenced not only by $w_0$’s conditional probability, but also by its distance to other words and their conditional probabilities. As a result, the most desired word does not always get chosen. Rewriting this in a matrix form, we are essentially calculating $\bm{p(w|c)}\bm{WW^T}$ during decoding. Unless $\bm{W}$ is from the SVD of $\bm{P}$, the resulting matrix is not an approximation for $\bm{P}$. Note that in some applications, such as machine translation, the conditional distribution $p(w|c)$ is often sharp. In this case, the first term in Eq. dominates over the second term and the approximation is valid.
Experiment {#Experiment}
==========
The proposed approach is generic and can be applied to accelerating the training process of word-level contextual representation models. In this section, we take ELMo as an example and demonstrate that our approach significantly speeds up ELMo, while largely maintaining its performance.
Setup
-----
ELMo consists of a forward and a backward language model, trained on the One Billion Word Benchmark for 10 epochs. For a fair comparison, all models we introduce are trained on the same corpus for 10 epochs. All experiments are conducted on a workstation with 8 GeForce GTX 1080Ti GPUs, 40 Intel Xeon E5 CPUs, and 128G main memory. The training code is written in PyTorch such that we could evaluate on most downstream tasks with AllenNLP [@AllenNLP].
#### Models
Model Input Contextualizing Output
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>]{}]{}</span> CNN LSTM Sampled Softmax
<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>*-S*$_{\small \textsc{}}$]{}]{}</span> [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">FastText$_{\small \textsc{cc}}$</span>]{} LSTM w/ LN [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} w/ [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">FastText$_{\small \textsc{cc}}$</span>]{}
<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-A*$_{\small \textsc{}}$</span>]{}]{}</span> [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">FastText$_{\small \textsc{cc}}$</span>]{} LSTM w/ LN Adaptive Softmax
<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-S*$_{\small \textsc{OneB}}$</span>]{}]{}</span> [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">FastText$_{\small \textsc{OneB}}$</span>]{} LSTM w/ LN [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} w/ [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">FastText$_{\small \textsc{One}}$</span>]{}
<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-S*$_{\small \textsc{CNN}}$</span>]{}]{}</span> Trained CNN LSTM w/ LN [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} w/ Trained CNN
<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-Sub*</span>]{}]{}</span> Subword LSTM w/ LN Softmax
To verify the efficacy of the proposed method, we introduce an ELMo model trained with our acceleration approach ([<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>*-S*$_{\small \textsc{}}$]{}). We also include the original ELMo ([<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>]{}) for comparison. Our main proposal is to use the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer as the output layer but there are substantial differences between [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>]{} and [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>*-S*$_{\small \textsc{}}$]{} besides the output layer. To make a fair comparison, we introduce an ELMo model with the adaptive softmax ([<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-A*$_{\small \textsc{}}$</span>]{}). [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-A*$_{\small \textsc{}}$</span>]{} is designed to differ from [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>*-S*$_{\small \textsc{}}$]{} only in the output layer so that we could study the effect of the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer in isolation.
In the following, we describe the details of these models mainly from three aspects: 1) the input layer, 2) the contextualizing structure and 3) the output layer. A brief summary of these models are available in Table \[table:models\].
**[<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>]{}**: The input layer is a character-CNN, and the contextualizing structure is an LSTM with projection [@SakSB14LSTMProjection]. The output layer is a sampled softmax with 8192 negative samples per batch. This model is provided in AllenNLP by .
**[<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>*-S*$_{\small \textsc{}}$]{}**: The input layer is the FastText embedding trained on Common Crawl [@fasttext_resource], denoted as [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">FastText$_{\small \textsc{cc}}$</span>]{}[^9]. The contextualizing structure is an LSTM with projection the same size as the one in [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>]{}, but we added layer norm [@LayerNormalization] after the projection layer as we find it beneficial. The output layer is the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer with [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">FastText$_{\small \textsc{cc}}$</span>]{} embedding as the target embedding. We use the cosine distance as the distance function of the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer because it is free of hyper-parameters and we find that it gives a satisfying and stable performance in preliminary experiments. The learning rate schedule from is used to aid large-batch training.
**[<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-A*$_{\small \textsc{}}$</span>]{}**: The input layer, the contextualizing structure and the training recipe of [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-A*$_{\small \textsc{}}$</span>]{} is kept the same as [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>*-S*$_{\small \textsc{}}$]{}. The only difference is that the output layer of [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-A*$_{\small \textsc{}}$</span>]{} is an adaptive softmax with 120 million parameters, half of the size of the one reported in on the same corpus. [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-A*$_{\small \textsc{}}$</span>]{} achieves a perplexity of 35.8, 3.9 points lower than [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>]{}’s 39.7. This shows that it is an efficient yet strong baseline.
We also list the performance of the following models for reference. [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo$_{\small \textsc{Org}}$</span>]{} and [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Base</span>]{} are results listed in but they are tested using different configurations. [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">FastText$_{\small \textsc{cc}}$</span>]{} is the non-contextual word embedding trained on the Common Crawl corpus with 600 billion tokens, which serves as a baseline non-contextual model.
Model Time SpeedUp Batch Params
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- --------- ------- --------
[<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>]{} 14 x 3 1x 128 499m
[<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-A*$_{\small \textsc{}}$</span>]{} 5.7 x 4 1.8x 256 196m
[<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>*-S*$_{\small \textsc{}}$]{} 2.5 x 4 4.2x 768 76m
: Model Efficiency. Time is in Days x Cards format. Batch is the maximal batch size per card. Params is the total trainable parameters in millions.[]{data-label="table:elmo_model_time"}
[l@l@l@l@l@l@l@l@l@l@l@l]{} & & [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo$_{\small \textsc{Org}}$</span>]{}& [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Base</span>]{}& [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">FastText$_{\small \textsc{cc}}$</span>]{}& & [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>]{}& [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-A*$_{\small \textsc{}}$</span>]{}& [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>*-S*$_{\small \textsc{}}$]{}& & [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-S*$_{\small \textsc{OneB}}$</span>]{}& [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-S*$_{\small \textsc{CNN}}$</span>]{}\
SNLI & & 88.7 & 88.0 & 87.7 & & 88.5 & 88.9 & 88.8 & & 88.4 & 88.2\
Coref & & NA & NA & 68.90 & & 72.9 & 72.9 & 72.9 & & 73.0 & 72.9\
SST-5 & & 54.7 & 51.4 & 51.30 $\pm$ 0.77 & & 52.96 $\pm$ 2.26 & 53.58 $\pm$ 0.77 & 53.80 $\pm$ 0.73 & & 53.86 $\pm$ 4.02 & 53.38 $\pm$ 0.68\
NER & & 92.22 & 90.15 & 90.97 $\pm$ 0.43 & & 92.51 $\pm$ 0.28 & 92.28 $\pm$ 0.20 & 92.24 $\pm$ 0.10 & & 92.03 $\pm$ 0.47 & 92.24 $\pm$ 0.36\
SRL & & 84.6 & 81.4 & 80.2 & & 83.4 & 82.7 & 82.4 & & 82.2 & 82.8\
#### Downstream Tasks
We follow ELMo and use the *feature-based* approach to evaluate contextual representations on downstream benchmarks. ELMo was evaluated on six benchmarks and we conduct evaluations on five of them. SQuAD [@Rajpurkar2016Squad] is not available for implementation reasons[^10]. We briefly review the benchmarks and task-specific models. For detailed descriptions, please refer to .
**SNLI**: The textual entailment task seeks to determine whether a “hypothesis” can be entailed from a “premise”. The dataset is the SNLI dataset [@SNLIDataset] and the model is ESIM [@ESIM].
**Coref**: Coreference resolution is the task of clustering mentions in text that refer to the same underlying entities. The dataset is from CoNLL 2012 shared task [@CorefDataset] and the model is from .
**SST-5**: SST-5 [@SSTDataset] involves selecting one of five labels to describe a sentence from a movie review. The model is the BCN model from .
**NER**: The CoNLL 2003 NER task [@NERDataset] consists of newswire from the Reuters RCV1 corpus tagged with four different entity types. The model is a biLSTM-CRF from , similar to .
**SRL**: Semantic role labeling (SRL) models the predicate-argument structure of a sentence, and is often described as answering “Who did what to whom”. The model is from and the dataset is from .
For SNLI, SST-5, NER, and SRL, we used the same downstream models as in re-implemented in AllenNLP. For Coref, used the model from . The authors from later updated their model and achieved superior scores with the new model [@CorefNewModel]. Thus we adopted the improved model in our experiments on Coref. For all the tasks, we use the default configuration with modest tuning, but all models are tested under the same configurations. Notice that the hyper-parameters are tuned to maximize the performance for the original ELMo and they may not be optimal for other models[^11]. But since all models are tested under the same hyper-parameters and our setting favorites the baseline ELMo model, the results still reflect the performance of our approach.
Model Efficiency {#Exp:WholeEfficiency}
----------------
In Table \[table:elmo\_model\_time\], we report the computational efficiency of the models[^12]. Overall, our simplifications to the input layer and the output layer of ELMo brings significant computational efficiency. [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>*-S*$_{\small \textsc{}}$]{} is 4.2x faster and 6x more memory efficient than [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>]{}.
To give a clear view of the speedup the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer brings, we compare [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>*-S*$_{\small \textsc{}}$]{} with [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-A*$_{\small \textsc{}}$</span>]{}. [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-A*$_{\small \textsc{}}$</span>]{} differs from [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>*-S*$_{\small \textsc{}}$]{} only in the output layer by using an adaptive softmax half the size of the one reported in . Still, [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>*-S*$_{\small \textsc{}}$]{} has a 2.3x speed advantage and is 3 times more memory efficient.
Moreover, the contextualizing structure used in these three models is an LSTM with projection written without cuDNN acceleration[^13], which is slower than a cuDNN LSTM [@cuDNN] and much slower than other fast structures like QRNN [@QRNN], SRU [@SRU], Gated CNN or Transformer. showed that such faster structures could deliver close performance and 3-5x speedup. Thus our approach might achieve even better speedup with faster structures.
Performance on Downstream Tasks
-------------------------------
Table \[table:overall\] reports the downstream task performance of each representation model. We focus on the three main competing models ([<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>]{}, [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-A*$_{\small \textsc{}}$</span>]{}, [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>*-S*$_{\small \textsc{}}$]{}) in the middle columns.
Our approach ([<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>*-S*$_{\small \textsc{}}$]{}) works especially well on semantic-centric tasks, such as SNLI, Coref, and SST-5. It shows competitive or even better performance than [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>]{} and [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-A*$_{\small \textsc{}}$</span>]{}. However, for tasks that required a certain level of syntactic information, such as NER and SRL [@He2018SRLSyntax], [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>*-S*$_{\small \textsc{}}$]{} suffers from slight performance degradation, but it still holds a large advantage over the pure word embedding model, [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">FastText$_{\small \textsc{cc}}$</span>]{}. We suspect that the performance degradation is due to the pre-trained embedding we used. Therefore, we conduct further analyses and discuss the results in Section \[Exp:SemanticSyntactic\].
Analysis {#Analysis}
========
We conduct further analyses regarding certain modeling choices of our approach, the subword-level language models and conduct a more detailed analysis of computational efficiency.
Modeling Choices
----------------
#### Sensitivity to the Pre-trained Embedding {#Exp:CorpusSize}
Our previous experiments are based on the word embedding trained on Common Crawl. In this experiment, we analyze how sensitive our approach is to the pre-trained word embeddings. We trained a FastText embedding on the One Billion Word Benchmark and denote an [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>*-S*$_{\small \textsc{}}$]{} model trained with this embedding as the input and target embedding as [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-S*$_{\small \textsc{OneB}}$</span>]{}. Notice that the code we used to train the one-billion-word embedding lacks a few new features compared to the common-crawl embedding provided in . The one-billion-word embedding and consequently [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-S*$_{\small \textsc{OneB}}$</span>]{} might be further improved with the new features. Comparing it to [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>*-S*$_{\small \textsc{}}$]{} (Table \[table:overall\]), we find that this model holds up surprisingly well, with only minor performance decrease. [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-S*$_{\small \textsc{OneB}}$</span>]{} is competitive with [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>]{} on SNLI, Coref, and SST-5 while being inferior on NER and SRL, still better than [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">FastText$_{\small \textsc{cc}}$</span>]{}.
We especially note that this [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-S*$_{\small \textsc{OneB}}$</span>]{} model does not enjoy any additional resources since the pre-trained embedding is trained on the same corpus ELMo was trained on and training only took two hours. The performance of this model, especially on SNLI, Coref, and SST-5, is attractive given that we have made substantial simplifications to the model.
#### Semantic Versus Syntactic {#Exp:SemanticSyntactic}
In Section \[Experiment\], we observed that models with FastText embedding uniformly performed worse than ELMo on SRL, which relied heavily on syntactic information. We suspect that the FastText embedding might be weaker on capturing syntactic information, while revealed that the CNN layer in ELMo is strong on capturing syntactic information. This motivates us to explore whether we could use syntactic-rich embedding and get better results on SRL. We find that the trained CNN layer from ELMo, surprisingly, serves as a kind of syntactic-rich word embedding. When we use that CNN layer as a pre-trained word embedding to train a [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>*-S*$_{\small \textsc{}}$]{} model (denoted as [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-S*$_{\small \textsc{CNN}}$</span>]{}), we observed a notable performance increase on SRL (Table \[table:overall\]).
[<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-S*$_{\small \textsc{CNN}}$</span>]{} is also a natural extension to an intriguing idea, CNN softmax from . They proposed to use a CNN to provide word representation for the softmax layer. The attraction lies in that CNN is very parameter-efficient and also posses the open-vocabulary feature. However, pointed out that the CNN softmax sometimes cannot differentiate between words with similar spellings but different meanings, which could potentially explain why [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-S*$_{\small \textsc{CNN}}$</span>]{} is inferior on certain semantic tasks (SNLI and SST5).
Subword-level Language Models {#Exp:Subword}
-----------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ ------- ------------------ ------------------ -- --------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -- -- --
**Avg** SST-5 SST-2 TREC MR SUBJ
[<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-Sub*</span>]{} 87.1 72.4 53.02 $\pm$ 2.08 92.17 $\pm$ 0.56 80.30 45.25 84.42 92.13 78.40 93.83
[<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-S*$_{\small \textsc{OneB}}$</span>]{} 88.4 73.0 53.86 $\pm$ 4.02 92.03 $\pm$ 0.47 80.31 44.99 83.21 91.60 78.85 93.84
[<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>*-S*$_{\small \textsc{}}$]{} 88.8 72.9 53.80 $\pm$ 0.73 92.24 $\pm$ 0.10 80.96 45.22 85.45 92.87 80.05 94.11
[<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">FastText$_{\small \textsc{cc}}$</span>]{} 87.7 68.90 51.30 $\pm$ 0.77 90.97 $\pm$ 0.43 71.10 38.40 80.12 71.80 74.30 89.06
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ ------- ------------------ ------------------ -- --------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -- -- --
Vocab TimeBatch16 TimeOneCard TimeFourCard Params Batch
----------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ------------- ------------- -------------- -------- -------
[<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} $\infty$ 0.03s 13.04s 4.61s 20m 5120
40K 0.05s 24.78s 9.68s 106m 2048
800K 0.06s 29.99s 16.14s 265m 1024
2000K 0.10s 54.77s 92.66s 420m 160
Next, we discuss the advantages and potential disadvantages of subword-level language models. By splitting the original words into smaller fragments (subwords), these models have a small vocabulary and can deal with arbitrary words, essentially circumventing the large vocabulary problem. They also possess the open-vocabulary feature in the input layer as they can split unseen words into seen subwords.
However, these models produce contextual representations for subwords rather than words. More concretely, consider a word ABC consisting of three subwords A, B, and C. Under the subword method, we would get a contextual representation for A, B, and C respectively. In some scenarios, we just want exactly one representation vector for word ABC instead of three. BERT approached this by using the representation for A as the representation for the whole word ABC. This method seems like an ad-hoc workaround rather than a principled solution. We are concerned that this could be unsuitable in scenarios where precise word-level representation is required. For example, it might not be optimal to use the subword-level contextual representation with the *feature-based* method in word-level tasks such as Coref.
We conduct a controlled experiment to verify our concern. We introduce a subword-level ELMo using the BPE segmentation with 30,000 merges, denoted as [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-Sub*</span>]{}. [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-Sub*</span>]{} differs from [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>*-S*$_{\small \textsc{}}$]{} in the input layer and the output layer. The input layer is a vanilla lookup-table-style subword embedding while the output layer is a full softmax layer. The input and softmax embedding are tied but trained from scratch. All other settings are kept the same as those of [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>*-S*$_{\small \textsc{}}$]{}. To make sure that [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-Sub*</span>]{} is a fair and properly-implemented baseline, we additionally introduce some sentence-level tasks with simple architectures that we think [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-Sub*</span>]{} should be good at. Concretely, we include classification tasks in SentEval [@SentEval], which attaches a simple softmax classifier on top of sentence embeddings to train models for sentence-level tasks. We follow to get sentence embeddings from contextual representations.
We find that [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-Sub*</span>]{} has inconsistent performance (Table \[table:subword\]). On SentEval, SST-5, and NER, it has similar performance with [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-S*$_{\small \textsc{OneB}}$</span>]{}. However, it lags behind on Coref and has almost breaking performance on SNLI. It even failed to outperform [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">FastText$_{\small \textsc{cc}}$</span>]{} on SNLI, a non-contextual model, which we considered baseline. These results are consistent with the observation in a recent work [@Kitaev2018parsingBERT]. They find that special design has to be made to apply BERT to constituency parsing because of the subword segmentation.
However, we notice that the scope of this experiment is limited. It is very likely that when the model is scaled up or used with the *fine-tuning* method, the aforementioned issue is alleviated, as evidenced by the performance of GPT and BERT. It is hard to judge whether the subword-level language models will work well under a specific setting, and we leave that to future work.
It is noteworthy that our approach still holds a speed advantage over subword-level language models. In those models, a softmax layer is still needed to normalize over a relatively small but non-negligible vocabulary. Moreover, words are split into subwords, which increases the length of a sentence. In our experiment, training [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-Sub*</span>]{} takes 3.9 days on four cards, which is 1.56x slower than training [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>*-S*$_{\small \textsc{}}$]{}.
Computational Efficiency {#Exp:DetailedEfficiency}
------------------------
In this section, we aim to provide a detailed study on the computational efficiency of the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer. We follow the setting in to compare with the adaptive softmax. We use a uni-directional LSTM with 2048 units. The input embedding is fixed as in our previous experiments. We vary the vocabulary size and show the results in Table \[table:speed\].
We first explain some of the statistics we report:
TimeBatch16: Time needed to finish a single batch with 16 examples. This reflects the computational time complexity of models.
TimeOneCard: Time needed to process one million words on one GPU when using the maximal batch size. This reflects the actual running time of models on one GPU card and is affected by both the computational time complexity and GPU memory efficiency.
TimeFourCard: Time needed to process one million words on a machine with four GPUs when using the maximal batch size. This reflects the actual running time of models on four GPU cards and is included to study the communication cost across GPUs.
We have the following observations:
#### Speedup and Batch Size
When the vocabulary size is small (e.g., 40K), the speed gain from replacing softmax with [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} for each batch is small (reflected by TimeBatch16). However, [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} still benefits from its memory efficiency. Therefore, by using a larger batch size, the overall speedup (TimeOneCard) is large. On the other hand, when the vocabulary size is larger, [Adaptive]{} becomes slower, while the complexity of [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} remains constant.
#### Multi-GPU Scalability
The speed superiority of the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer is magnified when we move to multiple GPUs. The speedup of the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer on TimeFourCard is consistently higher than that on TimeOneCard. This will be very useful when we scale to dozens or hundreds of machines.
#### Super Large Vocabulary
The [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer has a great advantage when the vocabulary is super large. In the 2,000K vocabulary test, the speedup on one card is already great. Using four cards for the adaptive softmax is even counter-productive as the communication cost exceeds the benefit of more GPUs. In this experiment, the hyper-parameters of [Adaptive]{} are the same as those in the 800K vocabulary test. We note that this could be suboptimal for [Adaptive]{} as one could choose to trade off accuracy for efficiency and change the hyper-parameters to allocate even less computational resources to the rare words. Notice that the 2,000K vocabulary is not an impractical setting. It is created on a tokenized 250-billion-word Common Crawl corpus [@CommonCrawl250Corpus], which only covers words that appear more than 397 times.
Conclusion and Future Work
==========================
We introduced an efficient framework to learn contextual representation without the softmax layer. The experiments with ELMo showed that we significantly accelerate the training of the current models while maintaining competitive performance on various downstream tasks. We also provided a theoretical explanation on the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer. For future work, we are interested in extending our approach to other contextual representation models such as BERT and scale these models to larger datasets.
Acknowledgements {#acknowledgements .unnumbered}
================
We would like to thank Muhao Chen for helpful comments. We also thank Yulia Tsvetkov and Sachin Kumar for help with implementing the [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Semfit</span>]{} layer as well as Jieyu Zhao, Kenton Lee, and Nelson Liu for providing reproducible code for experiments.
[^1]: https://github.com/allenai/bilm-tf/issues/55
[^2]: The code and models will be released in the near future.
[^3]: For example, the context-dependent vectors are the hidden states if LSTM is used as the contextualizing structure.
[^4]: In unidirectional language models, for word $w_i$, $\bm{c_i}$ is only dependent on $w_{1\sim i}$ or $w_{i\sim n}$, and we train the $\bm{c_i}$ to predict $w_{i+1}$ or $w_{i-1}$. For the masked language model in BERT, part of the text is masked and the task is to predict the masked words. Suppose word $w_i$ is masked, $\bm{c_i}$ is actually dependent on the whole masked sentence and we train $\bm{c_i}$ to predict $w_i$.
[^5]: We keep the pre-trained embedding in the main memory instead of loading them to the GPU memory since it does not need to be updated. This comes at a cost as we need to move the embedding needed for words in a batch from CPU to GPU at each time step. When the GPU memory is abundant, we could keep the word embedding on GPU to avoid this additional communication cost. But on mainstream hardwares, the GPU memory is often comparatively limited and this trick proves to be beneficial in our preliminary experiments.
[^6]: For L2 loss, the $\bm{{w}}$ is the unnormalized word embedding while for cosine and NLLvMF loss, the $\bm{{w}}$ is the normalized word embedding. For simplicity, we abuse the notation and use $\bm{{w}}$ uniformly. $\bm{\bar{c}}$ is the normalized $\bm{{c}}$.
[^7]: $\bm{\tilde{c}}$ is a vector corresponding to the context $c$. $\bm{\tilde{c}}$, $f(\|\bm{\tilde{c}}\|))$ and $\lambda$ take different forms in different losses. In the L2 loss, $\bm{\tilde{c}}$ is the unormalized $\bm{{c}}$, $f(\|\bm{\tilde{c}}\|)) = \bm{{c}}^2$, and $\lambda = 2$. In the cosine loss, $\bm{\tilde{c}}$ is $\bm{\bar{c}}$, $f(\|\bm{\tilde{c}}\|)) = 0$, and $\lambda = 1$. In NLLvMF, $\bm{\tilde{c}}$ is the unormalized $\bm{{c}}$ while $\lambda = \lambda_2$. $f(\|\bm{\tilde{c}}\|)) = -\log C_d(\|\bm{c}\|) + \lambda_1 \|\bm{c}\|$ serves as a way to constrain the norm of $\bm{{c}}$.
[^8]: This is true for the cosine and NLLvMF distance. For L2 distance it is more complicated and we mainly focus on the cosine and NLLvMF distance here. But note that the decoding algorithm is still flawed under L2 distance.
[^9]: There are two ways to use the FastText embedding. For words in a pre-defined vocabulary, one could use the conventional word embedding; for OOV words, one could use subword embedding to compute word embedding. For consistency, we always use the subword embedding.
[^10]: The SQuAD experiment in was conducted with code written in TensorFlow. The experiment setting is not currently available in AllenNLP (https://github.com/allenai/allennlp/pull/1626), nor can it be easily replicated in PyTorch.
[^11]: For example, the number of epochs is tuned for ELMo and some models may need more epochs to train. In addition, for SRL, the reported score by AllenNLP is lower than the score from CoNLL official script.
[^12]: The statistics of [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>]{} are reported by the authors of ELMo so the number of the GPU used is different for [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>]{}. We tested [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo*-A*$_{\small \textsc{}}$</span>]{} and [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>*-S*$_{\small \textsc{}}$]{} using the same kind of GPU so the numbers are directly comparable. This setting actually favors [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ELMo</span>]{} as the communication cost on three cards is smaller than that on four cards.
[^13]: There is no readily-available implementation of LSTM with projection in PyTorch with cuDNN acceleration now.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'The amount of dialogue history to include in a conversational agent is often underestimated and/or set in an empirical and thus possibly naive way. This suggests that principled investigations into optimal context windows are urgently needed given that the amount of dialogue history and corresponding representations can play an important role in the overall performance of a conversational system. This paper studies the amount of history required by conversational agents for reliably predicting dialogue rewards. The task of dialogue reward prediction is chosen for investigating the effects of varying amounts of dialogue history and their impact on system performance. Experimental results using a dataset of 18K human-human dialogues report that lengthy dialogue histories of at least 10 sentences are preferred (25 sentences being the best in our experiments) over short ones, and that lengthy histories are useful for training dialogue reward predictors with strong positive correlations between target dialogue rewards and predicted ones.'
author:
- |
Heriberto Cuayáhuitl$^1$, Seonghan Ryu$^2$, Donghyeon Lee$^2$, Jihie Kim$^2$\
$^1$University of Lincoln, School of Computer Science, Lincoln, United Kingdom\
$^2$Samsung Research, Artificial Intelligence Team, Seoul, South Korea\
`[email protected]`, `{seonghan.ryu,dh.semko.lee,jihie.kim}@samsung.com`\
bibliography:
- 'refs.bib'
title: 'A Study on Dialogue Reward Prediction for Open-Ended Conversational Agents'
---
Introduction
============
Deep Reinforcement Learning holds a lot of promise for training intelligent conversational machines [@SimpleDS; @Gao2018; @Deng2018], which can infer their behaviour from trial and error via interaction with an environment in order to optimise a long term reward signal [@SuttonB2018; @Li17b]. This machine learning paradigm is interesting and worth studying because it resembles human learning [@schultz:science97; @MnihKSRVBGRFOPB15], and has wide application from low-level to high-level control using a single or multiple modalities. However, its successful application is not trivial due to interactions with real world environments (not easy to model), complex decision-making at different levels of granularity (not easy to infer or specify), and unkwown reward signals (also not easy to infer or specify), among others. In this paper we focus our attention to the latter only, the reward signals, in the context of conversational agents. Specifically, we focus on open-ended dialogue agents because they have received little attention so far in the literature—as described in Section \[literature\_review\]. This type of agents are interesting and challenging at the same time because the amount of input features and their combinations are simply vast, making decision-making difficult. Even when some reward functions have been proposed by previous works [@LiMSJRJ16; @LiMSJRJ17; @SerbanEtAl2018long] it is unclear what is the best reward function to use for training future conversational agents or chatbots.
Our study uses a dataset of human-human dialogues, which we extend with noisy dialogues by replacing human responses with randomly chosen responses from other dialogues. While non-noisy dialogues aim to show human-like and desirable outputs, the noisy ones aim to exemplify less desirable behaviour. Each dialogue is automatically labelled with a numerical reward according to the amount of noise (distorted sentences)—the automatic labels facilitate its application to other datasets. This extended dataset is used for predicting dialogue rewards of open-ended conversations. As part of our study, we propose a new reward function that is easy to implement and that strongly correlates with test human-human dialogues. The latter is indeed possible by using lengthy dialogue histories.
Related Work {#literature_review}
============
So far little attention has been devoted to predicting numerical rewards of open-ended dialogues, which can be used to optimise the behaviour of dialogue agents such as chit-chat chatbots. By dialogue reward prediction we mean ‘estimating the quality of human-computer or human-human dialogues’, where quality can be measured for example via task success, user satisfaction or human-likeness, among others. Most previous related works focus on task-oriented dialogue systems, which require labelled data typically collected by a previously developed dialogue system. For example, [@SuGY18] used previously collected human-computer dialogues in the domain of restaurants for training an LSTM-based dialogue regressor for predicting rewards of the form $\mathcal{R}=20 \times 1_{success} -N$, where a value of 20 is given for a successful dialogue minus the number of dialogue turns. Such a regressor—which can be turned into a binary classifier for predicting success or failure—was re-trained online together with a dialogue policy using active learning. [@NoseworthyCP17] also use LSTM-based predictors of dialogue success (or failure) in the programming domain (StackOverflow data) based on word-based features, where success is given to a correctly answered question—failure otherwise. Similarly, [@PapangelisKS17] explores other machine learning techniques for predicting dialogue success but from acoustic features instead of word-based features. [@UltesBCMRSWGY17] predict dialogue rewards of the form $\mathcal{R}=(iq-1) \times 5 -N$, where $iq$ is an interaction quality value derived from a multiclass classifier. While speech recognition features and dialogue actions are used as inputs, the outputs used for training were obtained from three human labellers that judged the quality of the interactions. The reward predictor induced from a dataset of bus information was used for training policies in the domains of restaurants, hotels and laptops.
The related studies above, motivated by the earlier work of [@WalkerLHWG02] in predicting problematic dialogues, have focused on task-oriented dialogues that aim to achieve a goal such as finding restaurant/hotel/laptop information, call routing, etc., see summary in Table \[litreview\]. There is however little related research on human-human or human-computer dialogues where there is no clear notion of a task or goal to achieve—notable exceptions are [@SerbanEtAl2018long; @LiMSJRJ17; @LiMSJRJ16]. [@SerbanEtAl2018long] train a neural multiclass classifier and linear regressor from human-chatbot dialogues from Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT). In this study, AMT human evaluators are given dialogues and are asked to rate the quality of candidate responses according to the following categories (or labels): 1 indicates an innapropriate response or one that does not make sense, 3 indicates neutral, and 5 is a highly appropriate and interesting response. The classifier receives inputs with 1458 features (including lexical, syntactic and semantic information) and outputs a label out of the five possible labels. The regressor aims to learn a reward function for open-ended dialogues. It receives inputs with 23 features (also including lexical, syntactic and semantic information) and outputs a real value between 1 and 5. This regressor was used to train neural-based reinforcement learning dialogue policies for open-ended dialogues – [@MisuGLT12] used a similar approach in a restricted set of domains. [@LiMSJRJ17] train a binary classifier for predicting whether a dialogue is human-generated or machine generated. The outputs of this classifier, derived from a two-class Softmax function, are used as dialogue rewards in order to train a generator that aims for deceiving such a classifier within an adversarial framework. [@LiMSJRJ16] produces rewards of the form $r(a,[p_i,q_i]) =\lambda_1 r_1 + \lambda_2 r_2 + \lambda_3 r_3$, where $a$ refers to the generated response, $[p_i,q_i]$ are the previous two dialogue turns, $r_1$ and $r_3$ refer to likelihood outputs of $Seq2Seq$ models, $r_2$ refers to dialogue history similarity, and $\lambda_i$ are empirically defined weights (easy of answering: $\lambda_1=0.25$, information flow: $\lambda_2=0.25$, and semantic coherence: $\lambda_3=0.5$). While [@SerbanEtAl2018long] reports a 0.40 Pearson correlation coefficient between predicted rewards and AMT human judgements, it is unclear whether or not the binary classifier proposed by [@LiMSJRJ17] or heuristic function of [@LiMSJRJ16] can produce rewards that correlate with human judgements. The work presented in the remaining of the paper goes beyond previous works as follows:
1. we study dialogue reward prediction for open-ended dialogues using automatically labelled data. This is in contrast with [@SerbanEtAl2018long; @MisuGLT12] who use paid human evaluators, which results in an expensive and time consuming process because large amounts of dialogues require labelling;
2. we use contextually-richer and automatically derived input features to represent dialogue histories. This is in contrast with [@SerbanEtAl2018long; @MisuGLT12] who use a small set of carefully designed features and with [@LiMSJRJ16; @LiMSJRJ17; @SerbanEtAl2018long] who use short dialogue histories for dialogue reward prediction; and
3. we investigate the impact of dialogue history length in dialogue reward prediction for open-ended conversational agents. Our best predictor—using rich dialogue histories—reports a strong positive correlation on unseen test dialogues, which is higher than the previously reported scores of [@SerbanEtAl2018long] with only moderate positive correlation.
Authors Domain(s) Model
------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- ------------------------------------
Su et al. [@SuGY18] Restaurants Recurrent Neural Network (LSTM)
Noseworthy et al. [@NoseworthyCP17] Programming (StackOverflow) Flat and Hierarchical LSTMs
Papangelis et al. [@PapangelisKS17] Laptops, Restaurants Support Vector Machines, Gaussian
Process Regressors, Random Forests
Ultes et al. [@UltesBCMRSWGY17] Bus, Restaurants, Hotels, Laptops Support Vector Machine (SVM)
Walker et al. [@WalkerLHWG02] Call Routing Rule Learner (RIPPER)
Misu, et al. [@MisuGLT12] Restricted QA in a Museum Unknown
Li et al. [@LiMSJRJ16; @LiMSJRJ17] Open-Ended Recurrent Neural Network (LSTM)
Serban at al. [@SerbanEtAl2018long] Open-Ended Fully-Connected Neural Networks
: Related works on dialogue reward or dialogue success prediction[]{data-label="litreview"}
Proposed Study {#study}
==============
We aim to answer the research questions [**How dialogue rewards can be predicted in open-ended conversations? How much dialogue history do open-ended conversational agents need?**]{} This study focuses on open-ended dialogues as those observed in chit-chat interactions. On the one hand, the longer the history the richer the context to take into account, but the more computational expense involved (due to high amounts of features). On the other hand, the shorter the history the simpler the dialogue context at a cheaper computational expense. In addition, we study the effects of short and long dialogue histories in the task of dialogue reward prediction—often used for dialogue optimisation—and we treat dialogue reward prediction as a regression problem.
Let $\mathcal{D}=\{d_1,\dots,d_N\}$ be a set of open-ended human-human conversations in raw text, where each dialogue $d_i=\{t_1,\dots,t_T\}$ contains a set of dialogue turns $t^i_j=\{s^1_1,\dots,s^1_X\}$, and each sentence $s^i_{j,k}=\{w^1_{1,1},\dots,w^1_{1,Y}\}$ contains a set of words as part of the verbal contribution in dialogue turn $i,j$. We use $T=|d_i|$ to denote the length—in terms of number of dialogue turns—of dialogue $i$. Assuming two partner conversants in each dialogue (our case), a dialogue turn has sentences of the form $s^i_j=\{(s^i_{j_A},s^i_{j_B})\}$—one per conversant in each dialogue turn, e.g. human A says sentence $s^i_{1_A}$, human B says sentence $s^i_{1_B}$, then human A says sentence $s^i_{2_A}$, human B says sentence $s^i_{2_B}$, and so on until the end of dialogue $i$.
We propose to derive dialogue rewards with automatically labelled data (for practical application) by extending a dataset of human-human dialogues and assigning [*positive values*]{} to responses seen in dataset $\mathcal{D}$, and [*negative values*]{} to randomly generated responses due to lacking coherence (also referred to as ‘non-human-like responses’). A complete dialogue can be rewarded as -5pt $$\nonumber
R_i=\sum_{j=1}^T r_j^i(a),$$ where $i$ is the dialogue in focus, $j$ the dialogue turn in focus, and $r_j^i(a)$ is given according to -5pt $$\nonumber
r^i_j(a)=\begin{cases}
+1, & \text{if $a$ is a human response in dialogue turn $(i,j)$}.\\
-1, & \text{if $a$ is human but randomly chosen (incoherent)}.
\end{cases}$$
Table \[exampledialogue\_good\] shows an example of a well rewarded dialogue (without distortions) and Table \[exampledialogue\_bad\] shows an example of a poorly rewarded dialogue (with distortions). Other dialogues can exhibit similar dialogue rewards or something in between (ranging between $-T$ and $T$), depending on the amount of distortions—the higher the amount of distortions the lower the dialogue reward.
turn Verbalisation Reward
------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------
A: hello what are doing today ?
B: i’m good , i just got off work and tired , i have two jobs . +1
A: i just got done watching a horror movie
B: i rather read , i have read about 20 books this year . +1
A: wow ! i do love a good horror movie . loving this cooler weather
B: but a good movie is always good . +1
A: yes ! my son is in junior high and i just started letting him watch them too
B: i work in the movies as well . +1
A: neat ! ! i used to work in the human services field
B: yes it is neat , i stunt double , it is so much fun and hard work . +1
A: yes i bet you can get hurt . my wife works and i stay at home
B: nice , i only have one parent so now i help out my mom . +1
A: i bet she appreciates that very much .
B: she raised me right , i’m just like her . +1
A: my dad was always busy working at home depot
B: now that i am older home depot is my toy r us . +1
: Example human-human dialogue with a good numerical reward $\sum_{j=1}^{T=8} r_j^1(a)=8$[]{data-label="exampledialogue_good"}
We employ Algorithm \[dgen\] for generating dialogues with varying amounts of distortions (i.e. different degrees of human-likeness), which will be used for training and testing reward prediction models. Given our extended dataset $\mathcal{\hat{D}}=\{(\hat{d}_1,y_1),\dots,(\hat{d}_N,y_N)\}$ with (noisy) dialogue histories $\hat{d}_i$, the goal is to predict dialogue scores $y_i$ as accurately as possible.
Turn Verbalisation Reward
------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------
A: hello what are doing today ?
B: ~~i’m good , i just got off work and tired , i have two jobs .~~ ~~+1~~
B: lol. she is more pop now. her old stuff was country. i like classic country . -1
A: i just got done watching a horror movie
B: ~~i rather read , i have read about 20 books this year .~~ ~~+1~~
B: i am good how about you -1
A: wow ! i do love a good horror movie . loving this cooler weather
B: ~~but a good movie is always good .~~ ~~+1~~
B: i do not enjoy the driving in my honda civic -1
A: yes ! my son is in junior high and i just started letting him watch them too
B: ~~i work in the movies as well .~~ ~~+1~~
B: do you like dogs ? I have two . -1
A: neat ! ! i used to work in the human services field
B: ~~yes it is neat , i stunt double , it is so much fun and hard work .~~ ~~+1~~
B: very cool . i had one of those . -1
A: yes i bet you can get hurt . my wife works and i stay at home
B: ~~nice , i only have one parent so now i help out my mom .~~ ~~+1~~
B: that is just great . we need more educators like you in the system . -1
A: i bet she appreciates that very much .
B: ~~she raised me right , i’m just like her .~~ ~~+1~~
B: is it bad that i hate pumpkins and trees ? -1
A: my dad was always busy working at home depot
B: ~~now that i am older home depot is my toy r us .~~ ~~+1~~
B: why not ? maybe you do not like to travel ? -1
: Example distorted human-human dialogue with a poor numerical reward $\sum_{j=1}^8 r_j^2(a)=-8$[]{data-label="exampledialogue_bad"}
\[h!\]
$\mathcal{\hat{D}} \leftarrow [\emptyset]$ Initialise dataset of original and distorted dialogues Iterate over the set of original dialogues Iterate over different amounts of noise ($|d_i|=$ no. dialogue turns) $score=|d_i|-(n*2)$ Score range: $(|d_i|\times-1),\dots,|d_i|$ $\hat{d} \leftarrow [\emptyset]$ Initialise distorted dialogue Iterate over all sentences in dialogue $i$ $s^i_j \leftarrow$ sentence of first partner conversant $s^i_{j+1} \leftarrow$ sentence of second partner conversant $\hat{s}^i_{j+1} \leftarrow$ distorted sentence of second partner conversant $\hat{d} \leftarrow $ append tuple $<s^i_j,\hat{s}^i_{j+1}>$ Append distorted dialogue turn $\hat{d} \leftarrow $ append tuple $<s^i_j,s^i_{j+1}>$ Append non-distorted dialogue turn $j=j+1$ $\mathcal{\hat{D}} \leftarrow $ append tuple $<\hat{d}, score>$ Append newly generated (noisy) scored dialogue $n=n+1$ $i=i+1$
Data
====
We used data from the [*Persona-Chat*]{} dataset[^1], which includes 17,877 dialogues for training and 999 dialogues for testing. The average dialogue length is 7.35 and 7.8 dialogue turns (166 and 186 words per dialogue, including punctuation) for training and testing, respectively. The vocabulary size in the entire dataset contains 19,667 unique words. See example dialogue in Table \[exampledialogue\_good\]. We used this dataset as seed dialogues in order to generate dialogues with different amounts of noise (or distortions)—as described in the previous section—and obtained 149,308 dialogues for training and 8,704 for testing.
Experiments and Results
=======================
Experimental Setting
--------------------
We represent a dialogue history via its mean word vectors as in Deep Averaging Networks [@IyyerMBD15], where sentences are represented with numerical feature vectors denoted as ${\bf x}=\{x_1,...,x_{|{\bf x}|}\}$. In this way, a set of word sequences $s^i_j$ in dialogue-sentence pair $i,j$ is mapped to feature vectors $$\nonumber
{\bf x}^i_j=\frac{1}{N^i_j}\sum_{k=1}^{N^i_j} c^i_{j,k},$$ where $c^i_{j,k}$ is the vector of coefficients of word $k$, part of sentence $j$ in dialogue $i$, and $N^i_j$ is the number of words in the sentence in focus.
To complete the preparation of our training and test data, vector ${\bf Y}=\{y_1,...,y_{|{\bf Y}|}\}$ is the set of target labels—generated as described in Section \[study\]. In this way, dataset $\mathcal{D}^{train}=({\bf X}^{train},{\bf Y}^{train})$ is used for training neural regression models using varying amounts of dialogue history, and dataset $\mathcal{D}^{test}=({\bf X}^{test},{\bf Y}^{test})$ is used for testing the learnt models.
All our experiments use a 2-layer Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) neural network [@choEtAlEMNLP2014], see Figure \[RNN\]. In this recurrent neural network—at each time step $t$ in a dialogue history—the first hidden layer generates a hidden state ${\bf h}_t$ as follows: $$\nonumber
\begin{gathered}
{\bf r}_t=\sigma ({\bf W}_r {\bf x}_t + {\bf U}_r {\bf h}_{t-1}),\\
{\bf z}_t=\sigma ({\bf W}_z {\bf x}_t + {\bf U}_z {\bf h}_{t-1}),\\
\bar{\bf h}_t=\mbox{tanh} ({\bf W}_{\bar{\bf h}} {\bf x}_t + {\bf U}_{\bar{\bf h}} ({\bf r}_{t-1} \odot {\bf h}_{t-1})),\\
{\bf h}_{t}=\mbox{BN}_{\gamma,\beta} \left[ (1-{\bf z}_{t}) \odot {\bf h}_{t-1} + {\bf z}_{t} \odot \bar{{\bf h}_{t}} \right],
\end{gathered}$$ where ${\bf r}_t$ is a reset gate that decides how much to forget the previous state, ${\bf z}_t$ is an update gate that decides how much it updates its activation, $\bar{\bf h}_t$ is an internal state, $\sigma(.)$ and $tahn(.)$ are the Sigmoid and hyperbolic Tangent functions (respectively), ${\bf W}_{*}$ and ${\bf U}_{*}$ are learnt weights, $\odot$ refers to the element-wise multiplication, and $\mbox{BN}_{\gamma,\beta}$ refers to Batch Normalisation with learnt weights $\gamma$ and $\beta$ [@IoffeS15]. Assuming that the equations above can be summarised as ${\bf h}_{t}=GRU({\bf x}_t,{\bf h}_{t-1})$ we get the following output taking into account both hidden layers $i$ in our neural network $$\nonumber
\begin{gathered}
{\bf h}_{t}^1=GRU({\bf x}_t,{\bf h}_{t-1}^1),\\
{\bf h}_{t}^2=GRU({\bf h}_{t}^1,{\bf h}_{t-1}^2),\\
o_{t}={\bf W}_{o} {\bf h}_{t}^2,
\end{gathered}$$ where $o_{t}$ refers to the predicted dialogue reward for dialogue history ${\bf x}_t$. We trained this neural network[^2] for varying amounts of dialogue lengths, where ${\bf x}_t$ included 1, 3, 5, 10, 25 and 50 sentences. Each sentence was represented with a mean word vector using the pretrained coefficients of the Glove model [@PenningtonSM14] (file glove.840B.300d.txt to be precise). Our experiments used the first 100 dimensions per word vector—empirical evidence reported that this dimensionality is a good compromise between prediction performance and computational expense. Note that the larger the word vector dimensionality the more parameters in the neural network. Other hyperparameters in our experiments include batch size=128, dropout=0.2, dimensionality=256, loss function=Mean Absolute Error (MAE), optimiser=Adam, epochs=100, and early stopping=10 epochs. In addition, the training set was split into 80% for training and 20% for validation. The number of parameters in our neural network corresponds to 668K.
![Illustration of our recurrent neural network for dialogue reward prediction[]{data-label="RNN"}](pics/gru2.eps){width="85mm"}
Experimental Results
--------------------
We trained neural networks for six different lengths of dialogue history, ranging from 1 sentence to 50 sentences. Each length size involved a separate neural network, trained 10 times in order to report results over multiple runs. Figure \[barplot\] reports the average Pearson correlation coefficient—between true dialogue rewards and predicted dialogue rewards—for each length size. It can be observed that short dialogue histories contribute to obtain weak correlations, and that longer dialogue histories ($\geq 10$ sentences) contribute to obtain strong correlations. It can also be observed that the longest history may not be the best choice of length size, the network using $25$ sentences achieved the best results.
![Bar plot showing the performance of our dialogue reward predictors using different amounts of dialogue history (from 1 sentence to 50 sentences). Each bar reports an average Pearson correlation score over 10 runs, where the coefficients report the correlation between true dialogue rewards and predicted dialogue rewards in our test data[]{data-label="barplot"}](pics/DialHistPlot.eps){width="90mm"}
Figure \[scatterplots\] shows a more detailed inspection of our results using a scatter plot for the best trained neural networks, one per dialogue length size, chosen according to their performance in the validation set. These scatter plots show the correlation between target dialogue rewards (in our test dataset) and predicted dialogue rewards. The data points are test examples, where the number of data points is the same as the number of examples in our test dataset. The scatter plots include Gaussian noise drawn from $\mathcal{N}(0, 0.3)$ in the X-axis for better visualisation at the expense of showing less correlations. It can be noted that 1 and 3 sentences in the dialogue history lead to weak correlations, 5 sentences in the dialogue history lead to moderate correlations, and 10 or more lead to strong positive correlations. From these results we can conclude that long (or very informative) dialogue histories should be used in open-ended conversational agents.
Conclusion and Future Work
==========================
This paper studies dialogue reward prediction for open-ended conversational systems. Our study aimed at finding a reliable dialogue reward predictor—useful for dialogue optimisation—using data specified in a principled and practical way. To achieve this we propose a new reward function, train neural regressors from automatically labelled data, and evaluate their impact using different dialogue history lengths. We adopted a dataset of human-human conversations and expanded it with noisy conversations in order to generate dialogues with varying amounts of noise, resulting in different dialogue rewards – the higher the numerical reward the more human-like dialogue and the lower the numerical reward the less human-like dialogue. Our new noisy dataset was used to train neural regressors that took into account different amounts of dialogue history in order to observe the predictive power of target dialogue rewards. We modelled sentences in dialogue histories via their mean word vectors, using pre-trained word embeddings. Experimental results show that dialogue histories including 10 or more sentences lead to good performance (i.e. strong correlations between target dialogue rewards and predicted ones), and that shorter histories lead to poorer prediction power (i.e. moderate or weak correlations between target dialogue rewards and predicted ones). A history size of 25 sentences reported the best results in our test data of chit-chat conversations. Our findings are in contrast with related work that have confined themselves to short dialogue histories of 2 turns [@LiMSJRJ16] or 2 sentences [@LiMSJRJ17; @SerbanEtAl2018long].
Future conversational agents or chatbots can optimise their behaviour using neural regressors with lengthy or informative dialogue histories. Other future works can also investigate the impact of different dialogue history sizes in other datasets and types of dialogues (e.g. task oriented conversations).
[^1]: Dataset downloaded from <http://parl.ai/> on 18 May 2018 [@MillerFBBFLPW17]
[^2]: Our experiments ran on a cluster of GPUs Tesla K80, and their implementation used the Keras library <https://github.com/keras-team/keras>
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We address a long standing problem concerning the origin of bosonic excitations that strongly interact with charge carriers. We show that the time-resolved pump–probe experiments are capable to distinguish between regular bosonic degrees of freedom, e.g. phonons, and the hard-core bosons, e.g., magnons. The ability of phonon degrees of freedom to absorb essentially unlimited amount of energy renders relaxation dynamics nearly independent on the absorbed energy or the fluence. In contrast, the hard core effects pose limits on the density of energy stored in the bosonic subsystems resulting in a substantial dependence of the relaxation time on the fluence and/or excitation energy. Very similar effects can be observed also in a different setup when the system is driven by multiple pulses of equal energy.'
author:
- Jan
- Marcin
- Janez
bibliography:
- 'Polarons.bib'
title: ' Nature of Bosonic Excitations revealed by high–energy charge carriers '
---
Solids are complex objects with different degrees of freedom, hence the charge carriers are simultaneously coupled to various types of bosonic excitations like phonons, magnons, plasmons or others. The longstanding problem in the studies on strongly correlated systems is to single out the strongest, and thus probably the most relevant interaction. However for many important materials, including the unconventional superconductors, we are still seeking the answer to a more modest question, whether the strongest coupling [of charge carriers]{} is to phonons or to some kind of magnetic excitations. The essential qualitative difference between these excitations is that the latter ones are hard-core (HC) quasiparticles, i.e. their spatial density is limited typically by one boson per lattice site. It is rather clear that the HC effects become important first in the vicinity of this bound, i.e. when the energy density is of the order of the frequency of the bosonic excitations. However, it might be impossible to heat up the entire system to such high energies since, e.g., the corresponding temperature may be too close to the melting point. A very promising solution is to excite only targeted degrees of freedom. Directly after such excitation, the total system is far from equilibrium since various degrees of freedom may have very different temperatures (energies to be more precise).
This solution is utilised in the recent time resolved photoemission and optical spectroscopies, where one studies ultrafast relaxation of a few highly excited charge carriers [@okamoto2010; @gadermaier10; @cortes11; @dalconte12; @gadermaier14; @novelli14; @rameau14; @rameau15; @dalconte15]. These carriers lower high initial kinetic energy (of the order of 1-2eV) in a narrow time-window, by emitting many of most strongly coupled bosons. In the vicinity of the excited charge carriers, the concentration of emitted bosons may be high enough so that the HC effects become visible.
In the majority of the recent theoretical papers, the ultrafast relaxation of highly excited carriers has been discussed separately for the couplings to phonons [@golez_prl2012; @defilippis12; @matsueda12; @kennes10; @kemper13; @sentef13; @werner2013; @baranov14; @kemper14; @werner15; @aoki2015; @lev2015; @sayyad15; @mishchenko15; @rizzi16] and to the magnetic excitations [@golez2014; @iyoda14; @eckstein14b; @golez2016]. On the one hand, the electron-phonon coupling is usually described within the Holstein model by two independent parameters: the dimensionless coupling strength, $\lambda$ and the phonon frequency, $\omega$. The electron-phonon interaction is efficient in any dimension, hence it has been mostly studied in the simplest case of the one-dimensional (1D) systems. On the other hand, the coupling to the magnetic excitations is studied mainly within the Hubbard or the t-J models. Each of the latter models contains a single free parameter ($U/t$ or $J/t$) which encodes the coupling strength as well as the frequency of the excitations. Since the spin and the charge degrees of freedom are separated in the 1D systems, relaxation due to magnetic excitations should be studied at least in two dimensions. Due to the essential differences between the studied models, it is difficult to specify the distinctive qualitative features of both mechanisms. In the present work we fill this important gap. We compare the relaxation of charge carriers in two models, chosen such that all the emerging differences are solely due to HC effects of the bosonic excitations. [We show that if the relaxation is due to the coupling to HC bosons, then the relaxation time shows pronounced dependence on the excitation energy and/or the density of excited carriers. The opposite holds true for coupling do standard bosonic degrees of freedom.]{}
[*Model*]{}. We consider two models on a one-dimensional ring with $L$ sites, each containing a single electron. The first one is the Holstein model (HM) while the second is a HC boson model (HCM) where phonon degrees of freedom are replaced by hard core bosons. Hamiltonians of both models have a very similar structure: $$H_{\rm sys} = H_{\rm kin} + H_{\rm bos} + H_{\rm int},
\label{ham}$$ where individual part of $H_{\rm sys}$ are as follows: $$\begin{aligned}
H_{\rm kin} &=& -t_{0}\sum_{j} \left({e^{i \phi(t)}} c_{j}^{\dagger} c_{j+1} + \mbox{h.c.} \right)\nonumber \\
H_{\rm bos} &=& \omega \sum_{j} b_{j}^\dagger b_{j},\label{ham_parts}\\
H_{\rm int} &=& -g \sum_{j} c_{j}^{\dagger}c_{j} (b_{j}^\dagger + b_{j}),\nonumber \\\end{aligned}$$ where $t_{0}$ is the hopping amplitude, and $c_{j}$ is a fermion annihilation operator on site $j$. Operators $b_j$ represent either phonon or HC boson field annihilation operator. There is at most one HC boson per site, hence $b^{\dagger}_i b^{\dagger}_i =0$. This restriction shows up in specific commutation relations $[b_i,b^{\dagger}_j ]=\delta_{ij}(1-2 b^{\dagger}_i b_i)$ for the latter operators. For clarity of comparison we introduce identical dispersion-less frequency $\omega$ and coupling $g$ for phonons and HC bosons alike. [The $\phi(t)$ represents the phase gained by the electron as it hops between successive sites. It is used to pump energy into the system as described in the last part of this work.]{} We measure time in units $\hbar/t_0$ and set $\hbar=1$.
We solve both models using the Lanczos-based diagonalization defined within a limited functional space (LFS) to obtain the ground state as well as for the time evolution. The generation of the LFS efficiently selects states with different phonon configurations in the vicinity of the electron thus enabling numerically exact solution of the polaron problem [@bonca99; @ku2002], and it is well-suited also to describe polaron systems far from the equilibrium [@lev2011_1; @golez2012; @golez_prl2012; @lev2015]. A detailed description of this numerical approach can be found in Ref. [@lev2011_1].
In the first part of this work we start the time evolution from the free electron wavefunction at a given wave number $k$, $\vert \psi_0(t=0)\rangle=c_k^\dagger\vert 0\rangle$ where $\vert 0\rangle$ represents vacuum state for electrons and bosons. We choose the initial kinetic energy of the electron $ E_\mathrm{kin}(t=0)=-2t_0\cos(k)$ to be much larger than the ground-state $E_\mathrm{kin}^\mathrm{GS}$ of the polaron. We then perform the time evolution under $H_\mathrm{sys}$, Eq. \[ham\], to obtain the wavefunction $\vert \psi(t)\rangle$ of the system. [This approach simulates polaron formation starting from a free electron with variable (possibly very high) initial kinetic energy.]{}
![$E_\mathrm{kin}(t)$ vs. time $t$ for different values of $k$ in (a) and $\Delta E_\mathrm{kin}(t)=E_\mathrm{kin}(t)-E_\mathrm{kin}(t=0)$ in (b). Dashed (full) lines are represent results for HM (HCM). Other parameters of the Hamiltonian in Eq. \[ham\_parts\] are $\omega=0.5$, $g=\sqrt{0.5}$ and the size of the system with periodic boundary conditions is $L=16$. Unless otherwise specified, identical parameters were used in all subsequent figures. [ The phase is set to $\phi(t)=0$ in all figures but Fig \[fig5\].]{} Thin horizontal lines present ground-state kinetic energies $E_\mathrm{kin}^\mathrm{GS}$. []{data-label="fig1"}](fig1.pdf){width="43.00000%"}
In Fig. \[fig1\](a) we present comparison of $E_\mathrm{kin}(t)=\langle H_{\mathrm{kin}}(t)\rangle$ of HM and HCM for different values of initial $k$. In all cases we observe a decrease of $E_\mathrm{kin}(t)$ towards a quasi steady state values $\bar E_\mathrm{kin}$ that remain consistently above their respective ground-state values $E_\mathrm{kin}^\mathrm{GS}$. We should stress that the total energy of the system $ E_\mathrm{sys}$ remains constant during the time evolution and it equals the initial value of the kinetic energy, [*i.e.*]{} $ E_\mathrm{sys}=E_\mathrm{kin}(t=0)$. The decrease of $E_\mathrm{kin}(t)$ is thus intimately connected to the increase of the phonon or HC boson energy. The main difference between the models under consideration is that phonon degrees of freedom can absorb in principle an infinite amount of energy while HC bosons can absorb at most $\omega$ of energy per site.
To facilitate further comparison of relaxation dynamics between two different models, we have shifted all initial values of $E_\mathrm{kin}$ to $E_\mathrm{kin}(t=0)=0$, see Fig. \[fig1\](b). For small $k$ , [*i.e.*]{} $k=\pi/2$ and $5\pi/8$, relaxation dynamics of HM and HCM are nearly indistinguishable. For larger values of $k\geq 3\pi/4$, however, relaxation of the HM seems to be substantially faster than that of the HCM. [Nevertheless, the quasi-steady state values $\bar E_\mathrm{kin}$ are nearly indistinguishable between the two models. ]{} Even though the relaxation process is not strictly exponential, we nevertheless found very reasonable exponential fits to the data, presented in Fig. \[fig1\](b).
 using the following analytical form $\Delta E_\mathrm{kin}(t) = A\exp{[-t/\tau]}+B$. In the inset we show the dependence of $\Delta$ on the wave number of the initial free electron wavefunction $k$. []{data-label="fig2"}](fig2.pdf){width="43.00000%"}
In Fig. \[fig2\] we present the central result of this work, that is, the comparison of relaxation times $\tau_\mathrm{HM}$ and $\tau_\mathrm{HCM}$ of the HM and HCM, respectively as a function of the quench energy that is defined as a difference between the initial kinetic energy of the electron and the average kinetic energy in the quasi steady state: $\Delta =E_\mathrm{kin}(t=0)-\bar E_\mathrm{kin}$. [ We found a relatively weak dependence of relaxation times $\tau_\mathrm{HM}$ on $\Delta $ in particular, there is no abrupt raise of $\tau_\mathrm{HM}$ at large values of $\Delta$. In contrast, much more pronounced dependence on $\Delta $ is found in the case of $\tau_\mathrm{HCM}$, see Fig. \[fig2\]. We observe a sharp up-turn of $\tau_\mathrm{HCM}$ for larger values of $\Delta $ signalling a significant slowing down of the relaxation process in the HCM. In contrast, at small $\Delta\sim 1.5$, $\tau_\mathrm{HCM}$ approaches $\tau_\mathrm{HM}$. We should also stress, that relaxation times for $\Delta \lesssim 2$ become less reliable since relaxation processes evolve over a smaller number of eigenstates. The dependence of $\Delta$ on the wave vector $k$ is presented in the insert of Fig. \[fig2\].]{}
![ Average number of bosonic excitations per-site $n_\mathrm{bos}$ vs. $t$ for different values of $k$ corresponding to different $\Delta$ as depicted in the inset of Fig. \[fig2\]. Dashed (full) lines represent results for the HM (HCM). The horizontal line indicates the infinite–temperature value of $n_\mathrm{bos}$ in the HCM. []{data-label="fig3"}](fig3.pdf){width="43.00000%"}
To gain a deeper understanding of the different relaxation processes in models under the investigation, we computed the average number of bosonic excitations per site, given by $n_\mathrm{bos}=\langle\psi(t)\vert \sum_i b^\dagger_i b_i\vert\psi(t)\rangle/L$, shown in Fig. \[fig3\]. We first note that there is no upper bound on $n_\mathrm{bos}$ in the HM case. In contrast, there is a formal upper bound $n_\mathrm{bos} \le 1$ in the HCM while twice smaller concentration $n_\mathrm{bos} = 0.5$ is reached only in the limit of infinite temperature. In both models we observe an increase of $ n_\mathrm{bos}$ at longer times as the $k$ and with it $\Delta $ increase. While $ n_\mathrm{bos}$ in the HM keeps increasing with increasing $k$, we observe signs of saturation in the HCM case as $ n_\mathrm{bos}$ moves closer to its infinite–temperature value $ n_\mathrm{bos}=0.5$ at maximal quench energy reached at $k=\pi$. In the HM we observe pronounced oscillations in the long-time regime with the time-period $t_p\sim 2\pi/\omega$ that are not reflected in oscillations of $E_\mathrm{kin}(t)$ since they are compensated by oscillations in the [interaction energy $E_\mathrm{int}=\langle H_\mathrm{int} \rangle $]{}, not shown. [ We observe also that $n_\mathrm{bos}$ in the HM systematically substantially exceeds $n_\mathrm{bos}$ in the HCM. Taking also into account that total energies of both models together with nearly equal $\bar E_\mathrm{kin}$, see Fig. \[fig1\], a large difference in $n_\mathrm{bos}$ represents a seeming contradiction. Nevertheless, the excess in bosonic energy is compensated by a lower interaction energy $E_\mathrm{int}$ (not shown) in the HM.]{}
![ Density plot of the spread of bosonic excitations $\gamma(j,t)$ for the HM in a) and HCM in b) for $k=\pi$. Dashed white lines represent the Lieb Robinson bound as described in the text. To facilitate a straightforward comparison between models, identical colour coding was used in both figures. []{data-label="fig4"}](fig4.pdf){width="42.00000%"}
We next present in Fig. \[fig4\](a) surface plots of the correlation function $$\gamma(j,t) = \langle\psi(t)\vert \sum_i c_i^\dagger c_i b_{i+j}^\dagger b_{i+j} \vert\psi(t)\rangle.
\label{gamma}$$ $\gamma(j,t)$ enables us to follow the spread of bosonic degrees of freedom during the time evolution. At short times, $t\lesssim 5$ and small intensities, $\gamma(j,t)\lesssim 0.1$, we observe a similar spread of the front of bosonic excitations away from the electron position at $j=0$. This spread is given by the Lieb-Robinson’s velocity (i.e., the maximal speed at which information propagates) that in both models equals the maximal velocity of a free electron $v_\mathrm{LR}=2t_0$. Since bosons of both types are dispersionless, the observed velocity is due to the electron that moves away from the bosonic excitation. At later times and larger intensities we observe a qualitative difference in $\gamma(j,t)$ between both models. In the HM there is an excess of extra phonon excitations at and in the close proximity of the electron’s position. In contrast, the HCM case bosonic degrees of freedom spread much more uniformly throughout the entire system. This represents the main mechanism that causes substantial slowing down of relaxation in HCM at larger values of $\Delta$. As $\Delta$ increases far beyond the typical bosonic frequency, $\Delta\gtrsim \omega_0$, in a semiclassical picture, the charge has to to travel ever larger distance to dispose off the excess energy.
![ Kinetic energy $E_\mathrm{kin}$, phonon energy $E_\mathrm{ph}$ and hard core boson energy $E_\mathrm{HCB}$ vs time. Dashed (full) lines represent results for the HM (HBM). [$\omega=g=0.75$, and $L=16$ was used in this particular case. Note that the upper limit of $E_\mathrm{HCB}$, reached at infinite temperature, is $E_\mathrm{HCB}^\mathrm{max}=L\omega /2 = 6$.]{} Multiple spikes in $E_\mathrm{kin}$ are due to step-like jumps in the phase $\phi(t) = \pi/2 \sum_{l=0}^3 \theta(t-l\Delta t)$ where $\Delta t = 25$ and $\theta(x)$ is the Heaviside step function. In the insert we present relaxation time $\tau$ with squares (full circles) for the HM (HBM), extracted from the relaxation of $E_\mathrm{kin}(t)$ in distinct time intervals between successive step-like changes of $\phi(t)$. []{data-label="fig5"}](fig5.pdf){width="41.00000%"}
We have demonstrated that the HC effects slow down the relaxation of highly exited charge carriers. Therefore, the future experiments showing the relaxation time vs. the excitation energy may shed light on the type of bosons, which are most strongly coupled to the carriers. However, in the majority of the experimental setups it is easy to tune the density of photoexcited carriers (e.g., by changing the fluence) but not necessarily their energy. Direct numerical simulations of the former problem cannot be carried out within the present model with a single charge carrier. However, we expect that a qualitatively similar picture may be obtained from the studies of a slightly different experimental setup when a charge carrier is driven by multiple pulses. The discussed scenario should hold independently of whether the bosons are excited by a single or various charge carriers. At the end, what matters for the hard–core effects is the density of the bosons and not their source.
In Fig. \[fig5\] we show how the relaxation changes upon applying subsequent pulses to HM and HCM. [We have simulated this case by starting the time evolution from the polaron ground state wavefunction at $t=0^-$, followed by successive step-like jumps in the phase $\phi(t)$ as described in the caption of Fig. \[fig5\]. Each jump in $\phi(t)$ causes an abrupt jump of $E_\mathrm{kin}$ followed by a relaxation process in which a decrease in $E_\mathrm{kin}$ is followed by the increase of the corresponding boson energy. In the HCM, the relaxation after succeeding pulses becomes visibly slower as the density of excited hard–core bosons becomes comparable with its value at infinite temperature, [*i.e.*]{} $E_\mathrm{HCM}^\mathrm{max}/L= \omega/2$, see also the caption in Fig. \[fig5\] ]{} In contrast, relaxation in the HM does not show any substantial dependence on the number of preceding pulses. This is clearly seen in the insert of Fig. \[fig5\] where we present relaxation times for both models as extracted from the exponential fits to $E_\mathrm{kin}$ in distinct time intervals.
[*In summary*]{}, we propose a simple mechanism to distinguish between two different classes of bosonic excitations that are responsible for the primary (fastest) relaxation mechanism of a photo excited charge carrier in time-resolved pump-probe experiments. The proposed mechanism is based on the recognition that phonon degrees of freedom can absorb essentially unlimited amount of energy while in contrast, the hard core effects, typical for [*e.g.*]{} magnon excitations, pose strict limits on the density of absorbed energy. For this reason the relaxation dynamics of the charge carrier coupled to phonon degrees of freedom very weakly depends on the excitation energy, while the opposite is true when the charge carrier is coupled to HC boson excitations. In the latter case the relaxation becomes less effective when the absorbed energy approaches the typical HC boson frequency, [*i.e.*]{} $\Delta\sim\omega$. The density of excited bosons can be tuned either by changing the fluence of a single pump–pulse, or by driving the system by multiple pulses. In the latter case the time span between the first and the last pulses should be significantly smaller than the secondary relaxation time when other, weakly coupled degrees of freedom start to influence the relaxation process.
To gain clear distinction between the two different cases, we performed simulations on nearly identical models containing either Einstein phonons or dispersionless HC bosons. However, in more realistic systems dispersionless HC bosons should be replaced by, [*e.g.*]{}, dispersive magnetic excitations with a given magnon velocity $v_\mathrm{mag}$. Still, even in this case the slowing down of relaxation due to HC effects is expected in two spacial dimensions when $\Delta\sim \omega (v_\mathrm{mag}\tau)^2$. Up to our best knowledge, the predictions of this work have not been yet tested experimentally. However, the very recent experiments on cuprates show significant fluence–dependence of the relaxation times obtained for the electron–states which are far above the Fermi energy (see Fig. 5 in Ref. [@rameau15]). This result suggests that in cuprates the charges are most strongly-coupled to HC bosonic excitation, which are most probably of the magnetic origin.
We acknowledge stimulating discussions with U. Bowensiepen, C. Giannetti. J.B. acknowledges discussions with A. Polkovnikov and M. Rigol as well as the support by the P1-0044 of ARRS, Slovenia. M.M. acknowledges support from the DEC-2013/11/B/ST3/00824 project of the Polish National Science Center. J.K. acknowledges financial assistance by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. This work was performed, in part, at the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, a U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences user facility.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: |
We study the evolution of chromospheric line and continuum emission during the impulsive phase of the X-class SOL2014-09-10T17:45 solar flare. We extend previous analyses of this flare to multiple chromospheric lines of Fe [i]{}, Fe [ii]{}, Mg [ii]{}, C [i]{}, and Si [ii]{} observed with IRIS, combined with radiative-hydrodynamical (RHD) modeling. For multiple flaring kernels, the lines all show a rapidly evolving double-component structure: an enhanced, emission component at rest, and a broad, highly red-shifted component of comparable intensity. The red-shifted components migrate from 25-50 km s$^{-1}$ towards the rest wavelength within $\sim$30 seconds.
Using Fermi hard X-ray observations, we derive the parameters of an accelerated electron beam impacting the dense chromosphere, using them to drive a RHD simulation with the RADYN code. As in [@2017ApJ...836...12K], our simulations show that the most energetic electrons penetrate into the deep chromosphere, heating it to T$\sim$10,000 K, while the bulk of the electrons dissipate their energy higher, driving an explosive evaporation, and its counterpart condensation — a very dense (n$_e \sim 2 \times 10^{14}$ cm$^{-3}$), thin layer (30–40 km thickness), heated to 8–12,000 K, moving towards the stationary chromosphere at up to 50 km s$^{-1}$.
The synthetic Fe [ii]{} 2814.45Å profiles closely resemble the observational data, including a continuum enhancement, and both a stationary and a highly red-shifted component, rapidly moving towards the rest wavelength. Importantly, the absolute continuum intensity, ratio of component intensities, relative time of appearance, and red-shift amplitude, are sensitive to the model input parameters, showing great potential as diagnostics.
author:
- 'David R. Graham'
- Gianna Cauzzi
- Luca Zangrilli
- Adam Kowalski
- Paulo Simões
- Joel Allred
bibliography:
- 'flarebibliogc.bib'
title: Spectral signatures of chromospheric condensation in a major solar flare
---
Introduction {#sec:intro}
============
Solar flares bear on multiple aspects of plasma physics, including the physics of magnetic reconnection, the transport of energy from the corona to the lower atmosphere, the production of coronal mass ejections driving space weather, etc. [@2011LRSP....8....6S; @2017LRSP...14....2B]. The solar flare paradigm remains widely accepted as a template for magnetic activity on other stars [e.g. @2017ApJ...851...91N], thus a full understanding of the phenomenon has a large relevance for astrophysics in general.
In particular, the chromosphere remains a crucial element to understand the development of flares. While the primary energy release mechanism is governed by magnetic reconnection in the corona, the chromosphere is the location where this energy is ultimately deposited, either via conduction or accelerated particles; this gives rise to the largest contribution to the flare radiative output [@2011SSRv..159...19F; @2014ApJ...793...70M], and, via chromospheric evaporation, to the necessary mass and energy to fill the flaring loops with plasma at temperatures in excess of 10 MK [@1985ApJ...289..414F].
After a long period of relative neglect, the past decade has seen a renewed interest into the chromospheric response to flares. This has been driven partly by the availability of novel instrumentation, such as the imaging spectro-polarimeters IBIS [@2006SoPh..236..415C] and CRISP [@2008ApJ...689L..69S], as well as the recent [*Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph*]{} [IRIS, @2014SoPh..289.2733D], which has been utilized in numerous flare studies. On the other hand, building on the pioneering work of Fisher and colleagues in the 1980’s [@1985ApJ...289..414F; @Fisher:1986aa; @Fisher:1987aa; @1989ApJ...346.1019F], several groups have developed radiative hydrodynamical (RHD) simulations that aim at understanding the effects of a strong and sudden heating burst affecting the lower solar atmosphere [@2005ApJ...630..573A; @2015ApJ...809..104A; @2015ApJ...808..177R; @2015ApJ...813..133R; @2016IAUS..320..233H]. The complexities of fully accounting for hydrodynamical (including the presence of shocks) and radiative transfer effects in determining the chromosphere’s response to flaring limit the simulations to the 1-D case only; this however is usually well justified by the control that magnetic fields exert to plasma dynamics [cf., e.g. @2015ApJ...809..104A; @2015ApJ...813..133R].
The flaring chromospheres resulting from the models can then be compared with proper observational diagnostics to gauge their realism; most often, this is accomplished by using radiative transport codes such as RH [@2001ApJ...557..389U] to synthesize relevant chromospheric lines (including the resonance lines of Mg [ii]{} h&k, Ca [ii]{} H&K, or H$\alpha$) in snapshots of the simulations’ output, to provide a direct comparison with observables. Some of the relevant mechanisms influencing the formation of these strong, optically thick chromospheric spectral lines in flaring conditions remain an active subject of study, including e.g. the effects of partial frequency redistribution for the Mg [ii]{} resonance lines [@2019ApJ...883...57K], or the role of enhanced densities on the broadening of the Hydrogen Balmer lines [@2017ApJ...837..125K]. Still, this method offers the best diagnostic possibilities, especially when the temporal evolution is factored in the comparison, as the dynamics of the flaring plasma are extremely sensitive to the details of heating and energy transport .
Comparisons of this kind have been attempted many times in the past using strong optical lines , and continued to date with data at much higher spatial resolution and spectral coverage [@2015ApJ...798..107K; @2015ApJ...813..125K; @2016ApJ...827...38R; @2017ApJ...847...48H; @2017ApJ...836...12K; @2019ApJ...878..135K]. Still, fully resolved – spatially, temporally, spectrally – observations of the impulsive phase of flares remain scarce, owing to the difficulty of positioning the slit of a spectrometer exactly at the flare footpoints, and exactly at the time of energy deposition in the lower atmosphere. As numerical simulations mostly concentrate on the very first instants ($\le 100$ s) of the flare’s development, comparisons with observations have often been less than optimal.
Recent observations of flare dynamics, obtained at high spatial and temporal resolution with the IRIS spacecraft and other instruments, are much improving this situation [@2018ApJ...867...85B; @2018ApJ...856...34T; @2018SciA....4.2794J; @2019ApJ...879L..17P]. One of the best examples to date of chromospheric dynamics and condensation during a flare has been presented in @Graham:2015aa [hereafter Paper I], who exploited a unique sit & stare, high cadence (9.4 s) IRIS dataset obtained during a strong flare, to reveal clear signatures of chromospheric condensation in multiple footpoints sources. The fortuitous development of the flare along the spectrograph’s slit allowed the authors to uncover the quantitative similarity of the dynamical behavior of a number of flaring pixels, hinting at the possibility of spatially resolved [*elementary*]{} flare kernels over sub-arcsec spatial scales. The use of imaging spectrometers working in the optical range appears also very promising: recently presented results obtained with CRISP, using the He [i]{} ${\rm D}_3$ line to study the chromospheric dynamics in a small C-class flare. The large field of view afforded by the instrument made possible the spatial characterization of condensation motions, that were found in the leading edge of ribbons, as previously reported by . Further, the condensation is found to decay from its maximum value of $\sim$ 60 km s$^{-1}$ down to zero in around 60 seconds, a very similar evolution to what reported in Paper I using the Mg [ii]{} 2791.6Å subordinate line.
An interesting result of is that the interpretation of their spectro-polarimetric He [i]{} data in the flaring footpoints requires the use of two separate chromospheric components (“slabs”), one related to the condensation, and another one pertaining to a deeper layer, where the spectral component appears enhanced with respect to quiet conditions, and modestly blue-shifted. This second component starts being visible about one time step (15 s) after the condensation’s maximum red-shift, and has been interpreted by the authors as due to shock heating (and possible rebound) of the undisturbed chromosphere by the moving condensation. A similar scenario has been presented by @2017ApJ...836...12K, using IRIS observation of Fe [ii]{} lines in flaring kernels: the authors showed how in some instances these chromospheric spectral lines were clearly composed of two distinct spectral components, one at the rest wavelength and one strongly red-shifted. However, the authors offer a fairly different interpretation than : using RADYN flare simulations [@2015ApJ...809..104A], constrained by the hard X-ray (HXR) observations obtained with [*RHESSI*]{}, they could reproduce the observed shapes of the Fe [ii]{} lines as due to concomitant effects of the energy delivered by a beam of accelerated electrons. In particular, while the low energy electrons (E $\sim$ 25 – 50 keV) in the beam are responsible for creating the evaporation and heating the chromospheric condensation – producing a strongly red-shifted line, the higher energy electrons (E $\ge$ 50 keV) can penetrate in deeper, denser layers of the chromosphere and heat them, giving rise to the enhanced stationary component. Key to understanding the flaring mechanism itself, is the fact that the relative timing, and strength, of these separate effects depends on the details of the heating input, including the hardness of the beam, and the duration of the input.
The IRIS flare studied by @2017ApJ...836...12K was observed in raster mode with a moderate cadence of 45 s, so that a full study of the temporal evolution of the chromospheric condensation could not be carried out. In the present paper we expand on these findings, using the unique dataset of Paper I to study the full temporal evolution of multiple chromospheric lines, in multiple flaring kernels, during the impulsive phase of the flare, with excellent spectral and temporal resolution. Following @2017ApJ...836...12K, we take advantage of co-temporary HXR data from Fermi [@2009ApJ...702..791M], as well as the IRIS Slitjaw Images (SJIs) to properly estimate the full parameters of the energy input. We further synthesize the Fe [ii]{} 2814Å line for comparison with the data; as shown by @2014ApJ...794L..23H [@2017ApJ...836...12K], this line is an important diagnostic in flares because the intensity originates from a similar temperature range (with a broad peak around $T\sim12,000$ K) as hydrogen Balmer bound-free radiation that dominates the IRIS NUV range.
The SOL2014-09-10T17:45, X1.6 event {#sec:flare_description}
===================================
The GOES X1.6 class flare SOL2014-09-10T17:45 developed in active region NOAA 12158 near disk center (N15E02). The complex two-ribbon structure encompassed both the western portion of the main, leading polarity sunspot, and a group of several smaller spots of following polarity embedded in the plage, as seen in Figure \[fig:irisaia\]. The flare developed in a bursty manner, with UV kernels of various intensity appearing in rapid succession, in particular running north-east to south-west along the length of the plage ribbon. At the same time, the ribbons expanded roughly perpendicularly to their length, as in the canonical flare model.
Several authors have by now described many aspects of the flare, including the precursor phase [@2016ApJ...823L..19Z], the eruption of a filament and slipping motion of flare loops [@2016ApJ...823...41D], the presence of [*quasi-periodic pulsations*]{} [@2015ApJ...807...72L; @2015SoPh..290.3625S; @2017SoPh..292...11N], and the occurrence of chromospheric evaporation [@2015ApJ...811..139T; @2015ApJ...813...59L] and its relation with chromospheric condensation (Paper I). Representative movies depicting the flare evolution are available in, e.g., @2015ApJ...811..139T and @2016ApJ...823...41D.
As discussed in the introduction, the present paper focuses on the chromospheric emission during the flare’s impulsive phase, and its diagnostic potential with respect to radiative hydro-dynamical modeling. To this end, we will discuss mostly the hard X-ray (HXR) observations obtained by Fermi/GBM [@2009ApJ...702..791M] and the UV spectra and images acquired by IRIS [@2014SoPh..289.2733D], in particular around the time of maximum IRIS UV emission. GOES soft X-ray (SXR) light curves and SDO/AIA images at various wavelengths will provide the necessary context.
Figure \[fig:goes\_intensity\] shows the GOES SXR 1–8 Å flux over most of the event’s evolution. A modest increase in the SXR is visible already from about 16:50 UT, but the main impulsive phase starts only after 17:20 UT. The event then develops very rapidly, with the SXR flux peaking already at 17:45 UT. The Fermi GBM count rates profiles, integrated in the energy bands 6-12, 20-50, 50-100, 100-300 keV, are shown in Figure \[fig:hxr\_intensity\]. While RHESSI was in night-time during most of the flare, Fermi completely covered the impulsive phase, revealing a strong and rapid increase in the 20 – 300 keV flux, starting from $\sim$ 17:22 UT and reaching its maximum around 17:36 UT. A second episode of enhanced HXR flux is also observed, between 17:43 UT and 17:50 UT. Further analysis on Fermi data is provided in Sect. \[sec:fermi\], in particular for the short time interval framed by the dashed lines in Figure \[fig:hxr\_intensity\].
![GOES 1–8 Å flux over several hours around the event. The data utilized in this paper pertains to the very rapid impulsive phase, as framed by the dashed lines.[]{data-label="fig:goes_intensity"}](goes.eps){width="8cm"}
![HXR detector count flux of the SOL2014-09-10T17:45 impulsive phase in several of the Fermi GBM energy bands. The dashed lines frame the interval corresponding to the period of maximum UV emission analyzed in the paper.[]{data-label="fig:hxr_intensity"}](hxr_intensity_oct.eps){width="8cm"}
A unique set of observations was acquired by IRIS, that was running a flare watch program on NOAA 12158, using the sit and stare (SNS) mode and the standard flare line list (OBSID 3860259453). High-cadence (9.4 s) flare spectra were obtained for many hours before the flare, and all the way to the end of the impulsive phase. Several spectral windows were acquired within the 1332 - 1358 Å, 1389 - 1407 Å (FUV), and 2783 - 2834 Å (NUV) intervals [see e.g. Fig. 3 in @2017ApJ...836...12K]. Exposure times were 8 s for both NUV and FUV channels up until the start of the flare; afterward, NUV exposures were reduced to 2.4 s to avoid saturation. Simultaneous slit-jaw images (SJI) were obtained at a cadence of $\sim$19 s, alternating between two channels: 2796 Å centered on Mg [ii]{}; and 1400 Å centered on Si [iv]{}. The $120" \times 120"$ field of view (FOV) of IRIS is shown as a white box in Figure \[fig:irisaia\]; the IRIS spectrograph slit is indicated with a dotted white line.
The peculiarities of the IRIS observations are many-fold: first, the spectrograph’s slit was positioned exactly over the plage flare ribbon, and intersected, among others, the strongest kernel within the whole flare (as observed in the SJIs). Second, the ribbon developed rapidly [*along*]{} the slit, providing multiple, independent instances of elementary flaring kernels (see Paper I for a more thourogh discussion). Third, the observations started well before the initiation of the flare, thus capturing the evolution of any given flaring area from their earliest moments. This is a very rare occurrence. Fourth, the 9.4 s cadence is among the highest ever achieved for UV flare spectra, and allows novel analyses of the rapidly evolving chromospheric condensation. Finally, the strongest flaring kernels were so intense that many weak chromospheric lines clearly turned into emission, providing a range of complementary diagnostics beside the most-often used Mg [ii]{} and C [ii]{} lines.
Figure \[fig:irisaia\] shows the flare’s ribbons at the time of maximum chromospheric emission, as determined from the 2796 Å SJIs. The most intense brightening in the IRIS images is highlighted by a pink contour on the simultaneous AIA 1600 Å image; at this time the kernel was at maximum brightness and directly sampled by the slit (the kernel can also be identified by the saturated region in Figure 1 of Paper I). The kernel was particularly bright between 17:29:48 - 17:31:41 UT; during this time its intensity accounted for 15-20% of the total 2796 Å SJI counts while accounting for only $\sim$1% of the total SJI area. In the following we thus focus on this particular feature, by studying its chromospheric spectra and their evolution, as related to the HXR signatures. Given the high cadence of the HXR data, and the excellent sampling of IRIS, such a dataset is most appropriate to compare with results from hydrodynamical numerical simulations.
Chromospheric dynamics (condensation) {#sec:chrom}
=====================================
Aside from the most used Mg [ii]{} h & k doublet, a multitude of chromospheric lines is found within the IRIS spectral range. Together, they can improve the interpretation of line shapes and shifts in terms of physical parameters of the flaring lower atmosphere.
In Paper I we showed the temporal evolution of chromospheric condensation in elementary flare kernels by analyzing the Mg [ii]{} 2791.6Å subordinate line. In particular, we used the position of the line bisector at 30% of the peak intensity level to estimate the amplitude of downflows. Similarly to earlier observations and modelling [e.g. @1989ApJ...346.1019F], condensation velocities of up to $30-40~{\rm
km~s^{-1}}$ were found, rapidly decaying to zero within $30-60$ s. While the evolution of the condensation velocity was extremely clear (see Figure 5, Paper I) we did not delve further into details of the line profiles themselves. It was, however, apparent that at several positions and times the Mg [ii]{} subordinate line profiles were strongly asymmetric, or even had distinct red-shifted components. Such a property was also noted by @2015ApJ...811..139T for several Si [ii]{} lines adjacent to the coronal Fe [xxi]{} line, but not analyzed further.
![Temporal evolution of Fe [i]{} 2814.1Å and Fe [ii]{} 2813.33 & 2814.45Å spectral profiles (top panel) and Mg [ii]{} 2791.6Å subordinate (middle panel), for flaring pixel y = 119.53. The intensity scale is reversed for clarity. The presence of a separate, rapidly evolving strongly redshifted component is obvious for all lines (horizontal dashed lines mark the rest wavelengths). The red diamonds (all panels) indicate the time of the spectra sampled in Fig. \[fig:spectraA\] and \[fig:spectraB\]. Bottom panel: space-time plot from a subset of 81 pixels along the IRIS slit (see Figure \[fig:irisaia\] or Paper I for context). The total fitted intensity of the Fe [ii]{} 2814.45Å line is shown in the inverted color table, red diamonds mark the position and times sampled above, while blue diamonds correspond to the spectra in Figures \[fig:spectraA\_16\] to \[fig:spectraB\_52\].[]{data-label="fig:ltspec"}](absorption_spec_fe2_rev.eps "fig:"){width="9cm"} ![Temporal evolution of Fe [i]{} 2814.1Å and Fe [ii]{} 2813.33 & 2814.45Å spectral profiles (top panel) and Mg [ii]{} 2791.6Å subordinate (middle panel), for flaring pixel y = 119.53. The intensity scale is reversed for clarity. The presence of a separate, rapidly evolving strongly redshifted component is obvious for all lines (horizontal dashed lines mark the rest wavelengths). The red diamonds (all panels) indicate the time of the spectra sampled in Fig. \[fig:spectraA\] and \[fig:spectraB\]. Bottom panel: space-time plot from a subset of 81 pixels along the IRIS slit (see Figure \[fig:irisaia\] or Paper I for context). The total fitted intensity of the Fe [ii]{} 2814.45Å line is shown in the inverted color table, red diamonds mark the position and times sampled above, while blue diamonds correspond to the spectra in Figures \[fig:spectraA\_16\] to \[fig:spectraB\_52\].[]{data-label="fig:ltspec"}](absorption_spec_mg2_rev.eps "fig:"){width="9cm"}
{width="14cm"}
{width="16cm"}
The presence of “satellite” red-wing components is clearly observed in multiple chromospheric lines, as vividly demonstrated in Figure \[fig:ltspec\]. In the figure we compare the temporal evolution of Fe [i]{} 2814.11Å, Fe [ii]{} 2813.33Å & 2814.45Å, and Mg [ii]{} 2791.6Å spectra, acquired in one pixel near the brightest part of the ribbon (y $\simeq$ 119, cf. e.g. Figures \[fig:irisaia\] and \[fig:difference\]). After a small rise in intensity shortly after 17:30 UT, a strong impulsive burst is observed at the lines’ undisturbed position, accompanied by a noticeable increase of the continuum level around the Fe lines (the variation of the continuum around the Mg [ii]{} 2791.6Å line cannot be clearly appreciated within the small spectral range displayed). At the same time, a separate component appears far in the red wing of all the lines, and rapidly migrates back towards the lines’ centroid over the next 4-5 time steps, i.e. in less than a minute.
The top panel of Figure \[fig:ltspec\] shows the Fe [ii]{} and Fe [i]{} lines, their behaviour essentially identical. The same pattern occurs for the Mg [ii]{} subordinate line (middle panel), and is observed with varying clarity in many other pixels and lines (see Figures \[fig:spectraA\], \[fig:spectraB\], and Appendix \[sec:appendixA\]), so the effect is certainly not due to unidentified lines. Common to all the spectral lines shown in Figure \[fig:ltspec\] is also a brief ($\sim$ 30 s) and weak (few km s$^{-1}$) blue-ward “rebound” occurring around 17:31:30 UT once the red-shifted component has fully migrated back to the rest wavelength. This will be commented upon in Sect. \[sec:conclusion\].
Condensation: Spectral Fits {#sec:chrom_spectra}
---------------------------
In the following we identify the Fe [i]{} 2814.11Å, Fe [ii]{} 2813.3 and 2814.45Å, Mg [ii]{} 2791.6Å, C [i]{} 1354.284Å and Si [ii]{} 1348.545Å lines as excellent diagnostics of flare chromospheric dynamics: while their intensity is much enhanced during the flare, these lines remain relatively narrow and unsaturated, and can be fairly well isolated from spectral blends and the general background.
Using the pixel at y=119.53 (marked in red diamonds on the bottom panel in Figure \[fig:ltspec\]) as a particularly clear example, we show in Figure \[fig:spectraA\] the spectra of multiple chromospheric lines in the Fe [ii]{} and Fe [ii]{} window, obtained at 5 consecutive time steps (black stepped lines). Fig. \[fig:spectraB\] shows the spectra of the Mg [ii]{}, C [i]{}, and Si [ii]{} lines in the same pixel, and times. The times in the panels of Figs. \[fig:spectraA\] and \[fig:spectraB\] correspond to the red diamonds of Figure \[fig:ltspec\], and the dotted black line indicates the nominal rest wavelength of each line. The wavelength scale was established by fitting the photospheric Ni [i]{} 2799.474Å line over a 3 hour period before the flare, to remove the residual orbital oscillation as described in the IRIS technical note ITN20. We also use the procedure described in IRIS Technical Note ITN24 [^1] to convert the raw DN output to intensity, as done e.g. by @2016ApJ...816...88K and @2017ApJ...836...12K. No subtraction of pre-flare background has been performed.
In Figs. \[fig:spectraA\] and \[fig:spectraB\] we see that all lines show a strong intensity increase at 17:30:26 (second row), with a concomitant, broad satellite component appearing at high red-shifts. The shifted component is weaker at first detection, but in the next two time steps its intensity becomes comparable with the main peak, which remains mostly stationary. While increasing in intensity, the red-shifted component rapidly migrates towards the rest wavelength, so that by 17:30:54 (only 37 s from the “pre-flare” time) the general appearance is that of a single, broad, asymmetric line. It is worth noticing that the red-shifted component is more prominent in the Mg [ii]{} spectra (Fig. \[fig:spectraB\]), and can often be unambiguously detected in them one time-step ahead of the other lines (cf. also the figures in Appendix \[sec:appendixA\]). This is probably due to the much larger opacity of this line with respect to the other chromospheric signatures.
Most of the flaring pixels display a behavior similar to that shown in Figs. \[fig:spectraA\] and Fig. \[fig:spectraB\], with spectral profiles very asymmetrical during their early activation, due to the presence of the satellite component, and a clear continuum enhancement from the pre-flare value, best observed in the Fe [ii]{} window. As an example, in Appendix \[sec:appendixA\] we show corresponding Figures for two additional pixels (y $\sim$ 117, and y$\sim$ 123 along the slit); these same pixels are identified with the blue diamonds in Fig. \[fig:ltspec\].
To characterize the dynamics of the condensation, we have thus fitted the profiles of each flaring pixel with a pair of Gaussian profiles. As the shifted component is so prominent, a Gaussian fit should provide a better estimate of the redshift over the traditional bisector method that we employed in Paper I, which we find can slightly underestimate the maximum shift (in Appendix \[sec:appendixC\] we make a side by side comparison of both techniques.) The weak spectral lines such as Fe [ii]{} and Fe [i]{} are most likely optically thin [see discussion in @2017ApJ...836...12K and Sect. \[sec:models\] below], so the use of a Gaussian approximation is further justified. For stronger lines, like the Mg [ii]{} 2791.6Å, we follow the original work of @1984SoPh...93..105I in assuming that the flare emission originates mostly from a separate, optically thin slab of (moving) plasma overlaying the stationary atmosphere. In Figs. \[fig:spectraA\] and \[fig:spectraB\], the quasi-stationary component of each spectral line is shown with black dotted lines, while the red-shifted component is displayed in red. The final overall fit is given as a thin black line. We constrain the central component in all lines to remain within $\pm$ 2 km/s of the rest wavelength, allowing the second shifted component to return as far as possible towards the line rest wavelength, and track its complete velocity evolution. At times, the spectral range in proximity of Fe [ii]{} 2813.3 Å can be subject to some ambiguities due to the presence of other, much weaker Fe [i]{} and Fe [ii]{} lines, but the fits are satisfactory overall. The same problem occasionally affects the fits for the Si [ii]{} line (Fig. \[fig:spectraB\]), due to an unidentified weak line that is visible in the later exposures around 1348.75Å. Its profile remains low in the red wing of the Si [ii]{} line, so we constrain the maximum intensity and position to avoid double fitting the shifted, satellite Si [ii]{} line [cf. e.g. the list of adjacent spectral lines in @1986ApJS...61..801S]. The stationary component of Si [ii]{} also has a tendency to peak just blue-ward of the rest wavelength during the rise phase. The profile is itself slightly asymmetric, perhaps indicating an unidentified blend not listed in the [@1986ApJS...61..801S] atlas or a difference in the formation height of the ion compared to the other lines shown. Aside from these small uncertainties, the general behavior remains very clear in all lines.
Lastly, we notice that the width of the red-shifted components appears to be very large with respect to that of the stationary component, and to the pre-flare situation in general. While some broadening could be expected due to the long exposure times coupled with the rapid motion of the component (particularly in the FUV), it is plausible that most of the excess width could be created by flare-induced turbulent motions in the chromosphere [@2011ApJ...740...70M; @2015ApJ...804...56R]; the fact that the width of the red-shifted component seem to decrease with time (cf. the top and bottom panels in Fig. \[fig:spectraB\] might support this interpretation.
Condensation: Time Evolution {#sec:chrom_time}
----------------------------
We now focus on the dynamics displayed by multiple flaring pixels, in particular those comprising the ribbon between the y=\[114$''$,127$''$\] positions in Fig. \[fig:ltspec\]. These are the same pixels analyzed in Paper I.
Using the fits described in Section \[sec:chrom\_spectra\], we derive the centroid of the second, shifted Gaussian component for each line, pixel and time step. The velocity scale for each line is obtained with respect to the rest wavelength shown in Figs. \[fig:spectraA\] and \[fig:spectraB\]. To remove fits where the velocity determination could be biased by nearby lines or low signal, we discarded the fits when the total intensity of the shifted component was below 30% of the maximum reached in any given pixel. This also removes some of the influence of the instrumental point spread function (PSF) described in Appendix \[sec:appendixB\].
To find commonalities in the flow evolution of the different pixels and lines, in analogy to Paper I we perform a superposed-epoch analysis, aligning the velocity-time curve for each pixel and spectral line to a common zero time. The latter is defined as the time at which maximum shift of the second component in Mg [ii]{} is reached for any given pixel. Figure \[fig:condensation\] displays the resulting curves. For each time step (given by the cadence of the observations, 9.4s) the number of pixels within a 2 km/s interval is represented by the gray scale. The bar in the figure gives the number of pixels within each time-velocity bin.
![Superposed epoch analysis of chromospheric condensation flows derived from the second component of the IRIS lines’ fits. The velocity curve for each pixel is aligned in time to the occurrence of maximum centroid shift for the second component of Mg [ii]{} at that pixel. The velocity indicates down-flow motions and the strength of the colortable dictates the number of instances within a 2 km/s velocity interval for each time step.[]{data-label="fig:condensation"}](vcurves_cen_may22.eps){width="9cm"}
From Figure \[fig:condensation\] we can immediately confirm that the behaviour described in Sect. \[sec:chrom\_spectra\] is common to the majority of the flaring pixels in the ribbon sampled by the IRIS slit. While clearest for the Mg [ii]{} line, the evolution of the red-shifted component for all considered pixels and spectral lines falls within a fairly narrow envelope, starting at a maximum redshift of up to 50 km s$^{-1}$, and rapidly decaying to a rest velocity within $30-60$ seconds. This confirms and expands our previous findings (cf. Fig. 5 in Paper I), that the “satellite” component of chromospheric lines provides a clear picture of the condensation occurring within each flaring pixel at the early stages of the flare. The overall decay curve is essentially identical in all lines, even if the spectra in the IRIS FUV and NUV ranges are acquired with different exposure times (8 s and 2.4 s, respectively). Thus, it seems that the 9.4 s cadence of the observations is rapid enough to preserve the basic properties of the condensation evolution [@1989ApJ...346.1019F; @2017ApJ...836...12K], although higher cadence data could provide further insight.
After $\sim$ 60 s from the peak velocity, the fits for the red-shifted component in most lines become ambiguous, and a large scatter is thus observed in the time-velocity plot. For the Mg [ii]{} line, a fit is instead possible for a longer period, and a fairly constant condensation velocity of few km s$^{-1}$ is observed for several minutes (not fully shown in Figure \[fig:condensation\]).
Finally, from Fig. \[fig:condensation\] we see that a “build up phase” of the flows is apparent in Mg [ii]{}, and possibly in other lines, 1-2 time steps before the peak. This corresponds to the presence of a weak red-shifted component for the Mg [ii]{} line, that can be observed earlier than for other lines (cf. the top panels of Fig. \[fig:spectraB\], \[fig:spectraB\_16\] and \[fig:spectraB\_52\]). It is however difficult to say whether this is due to a differences in opacity between the lines or to some artifact of the PSF (see Appendix \[sec:appendixB\]).
HXR spectra {#sec:fermi}
===========
Modern radiative-hydrodynamical models of the flaring lower solar atmosphere like the flare RADYN code [@2015ApJ...809..104A] usually assume that the flare energy is transported from the corona by means of a beam of accelerated, mildly relativistic electrons. The parameters characterizing the electrons beam can be derived by analyzing the HXR spectra originating from the flaring atmosphere, assuming that the bremsstrahlung emission derives from the impact of such beam onto the dense chromosphere [e.g. @1971SoPh...18..489B].
To this end, we analyzed the HXR data acquired by the Fermi/Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM). As mentioned in Section \[sec:flare\_description\], Fermi fully covered the impulsive phase of the flare. GBM continuously observes the whole unocculted sky, recording two different data types: CTIME data, with a fine time resolution (0.256 s; 64 ms on flare trigger), but a coarse spectral resolution in 8 energy channels; and CSPEC data, with lower time resolution (4.096 s; 1.024 s on flare trigger), and a spectral resolution of 128 energy channels over the 8 keV - 1 MeV spectral region. In the following we use CSPEC data, acquired with the NaI02 detector, which was the most favorably oriented one among the twelve sodium iodide (NaI(Tl)) scintillation detectors.
The count rates profiles integrated in four energy bands are shown in Figure \[fig:hxr\_intensity\] and briefly discussed in Section \[sec:flare\_description\]. The flare was so strong that the 1 s cadence spectra have a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), so we can reliably derive the HXR spectral parameters at this high temporal resolution. An example of a single Fermi spectrum acquired during the maximum of the flare is given in Figure \[fig:fermi\_spectrum\].
![ Top panel: HXR spectrum around the time of flare maximum, from Fermi-CSPEC data (black points with error bars). In gray is the pre-flare background flux averaged between 17:13 and 17:15 UT. The colored curves represent the fit obtained from the OSPEX forward fitting procedure, including a thermal component (dark blue), a single power-law component (light blue), and the combined fit (red). Dotted and dashed lines indicate the lower and upper limits of the two energy ranges used for the non-thermal component fit (10–30 keV and 45–200 keV); this is necessary due to calibration issues that affect the intermediate energies (see text). Bottom panel: the residuals between the fitted distribution and real data, normalized to the 1-$\sigma$ uncertainty for each respective data point. The fitted distribution can be considered acceptable as most of the points lie within 2-$\sigma$. []{data-label="fig:fermi_spectrum"}](figure8){width="8cm"}
Assuming that the bremsstrahlung emission originates in a cold thick-target [@1971SoPh...18..489B], we deduce the accelerated electrons’ energy spectrum as characterized by the total flux of non-thermal electrons, a power-law index $\delta$, and a low energy cut-off $E_{\rm c}$ of the electron energy distribution. The parameters characterizing the low-energy, thermal component are the electron temperature and the emission measure.
The total non-thermal electron power is calculated using the following relation [@2011SSRv..159..107H]:
$$P_{\rm nth}=k_{\rm E}\int_{E_c}^{+\infty}{E_0{\cal{F}}_0(E_0)}dE_0=
\frac{k_E A}{\delta -2}E_c^{-\delta +2}~{\rm erg~s^{-1}}$$
where ${\cal{F}}_0$ is the injected electron beam flux distribution, $E_c$ is the low energy cut-off, $\delta$ is the spectral index of the electron energy distribution, $k_E$ is the conversion from keV to erg, and $A$ is the normalization factor of the electron flux distribution. The total non-thermal electron energy input in the flare can be estimated by integrating $P_{\rm nth}$ over the flaring time interval.
The data analysis and the fitting procedure have been performed with the OSPEX routines of SolarSoft package [@2002SoPh..210..165S]. As the Fermi/GBM data have a known calibration issue at the Iodine K-edge energy of 33.17 keV, resulting in a discontinuity in the response of the NaI detectors in the case of bright bursts [@2009ExA....24...47B], we have conservatively excluded the 30–45 keV range from the fits. This is indicated with the dotted and dashed lines in Fig. \[fig:fermi\_spectrum\].
We have also opted not to include an albedo component in the fit, although this could potentially be significant in the HXR spectra due to the location of the flare close to disk center [@Santangelo:1973SoPh...29..143S]. However, several assumptions that enter the possible albedo contribution, in particular the pitch-angle distribution function of the non-thermal electrons, and the absence of any magnetic mirroring effects , are not independently verifiable. The most relevant contribution of the albedo component is expected in the range $\sim$ 15–50 keV , i.e. overlapping the 30–45 keV range that we excluded from the fit due to the instrumental effects mentioned above. We thus feel that our choice is justified, and note that the results of the fit including the albedo contribution would only potentially decrease the total number of non-thermal electrons by a factor of about 3 , well within our final estimate of the overall flux (cf. Sect. \[sec:uv\_vs\_hxr\]).
Most of the spectra observed during the impulsive phase are well represented by a thermal component (dark blue in Figure \[fig:fermi\_spectrum\]) plus a single power-law component (light blue), describing the electron bremsstrahlung emission in the 10-200 keV range. During the strongest HXR intensity peaks, however, the spectral fit procedure can at times return somewhat ambiguous results, as multiple solutions can be obtained for the same spectra. A major cause of this ambiguity is the balance between thermal and non-thermal components that can be assigned in the final spectral characterization. For this reason our approach has been to derive the electron temperature from simultaneous GOES observations [see @2005SoPh..227..231W], thus better constraining the thermal component. In general, the $\delta$ spectral index is well characterized in the fits, while the estimate of the power contained in the non-thermal electrons strongly depends on the total flux of non-thermal electrons and the low energy cut-off value. Better constraining the temperature in this case provides a more realistic estimate of the low energy cut-off, critical for modeling (see Section \[sec:models\]).
![Time profile of the HXR spectral parameters obtained from the fits of Fermi spectra at 1 s cadence. Values shown are averaged over 10 s; vertical brown bars represent the variations over such intervals (some bars are so small to be hidden in the plot). From top to bottom: emission measure and electron temperature of the thermal component; spectral index $\delta$, cutoff energy and total power of the non-thermal electrons’ energy distribution; non-thermal electrons’ flux. The latter requires an estimate of the area involved in the HXR emission, as described in Sect. \[sec:uv\_areas\].[]{data-label="fig:hxr_fit_parameters"}](hxr_fit_parameters.eps){width="8cm"}
The evolution of the model parameters derived from the fits are shown in Figure \[fig:hxr\_fit\_parameters\] for an 8 minute interval during the flare’s impulsive phase. Given that the IRIS data are acquired with a 9.4 s cadence, after fitting all the spectra at their original time resolution of 1 s we calculated the mean and the rms of the spectral parameters over 10 s intervals, assuming that the dispersion of their values mostly represents the uncertainties of the fitting procedure rather than a real evolution of the spectra within 10 s. The short vertical bars in Fig. \[fig:hxr\_fit\_parameters\] indicate the range of variation for each parameter in such intervals. The dashed lines, also outlined in Fig. \[fig:hxr\_intensity\], frame the period of maximum UV emission and condensation flows for the flaring pixels sampled by the IRIS slit. Figure \[fig:hxr\_fit\_parameters\] reveals fairly hard spectra with $\delta \approx 5$, in particular during the first intensity peak phase around 17:27-17:28 UT (cf. Fig. \[fig:hxr\_intensity\]). The non-thermal electron power however reaches its maximum of $P_{nth} \approx 2-3 \times 10^{29}$ erg s$^{-1}$ within the 17:29-17:31 interval, which corresponds to the maximum emission in the IRIS channels. This is also the interval when maximum flux is inferred, as described in the next section.
Finally, by using the derived values of non-thermal electron power integrated over the whole flare duration (from 17:20:16 to 17:51:00, i.e. significantly longer than the interval shown in Fig. \[fig:hxr\_fit\_parameters\]), we estimate a total energy content in the accelerated electrons of about $10^{32}~{\rm erg}$. This is broadly consistent with values reported in the literature for large eruptive flares, e.g. @2012ApJ...759...71E.
Area and duration of energy release episodes {#sec:uv_areas}
============================================
The spatially unresolved Fermi observations are ill-suited to estimate two parameters crucial to a full description of the electrons’ beam: the energy flux (erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$) impinging on the chromosphere, which depends on the (time-varying) area involved, and the duration of such energy input in any given area. These values can be derived from RHESSI combined imaging and spectroscopy when available; even so, they often suffer from large uncertainties due to poor spatial and temporal resolution, or noise in the data. For this reason, it has become customary to estimate the area interested by electron precipitation directly from the size of optical and UV chromospheric brightnenings [e.g. @2011ApJ...739...96K; @2015ApJ...813..125K; @2015ApJ...798..107K; @2017ApJ...836...12K].
The duration of each energy deposition episode is instead estimated using various techniques, including the rising time of individual kernels’ UV brightness [@2010ApJ...725..319Q; @2012ApJ...752..124Q], the duration of “single” bursts in the HXR (or derivative of soft X-ray) curves , or the comparison of coronal diagnostics with multi-thread modeling employing the duration as a free parameter [@2006ApJ...637..522W]. In the following we attempt to provide realistic estimates for these two beam parameters for the case of SOL2014-09-10T17:45 by using the concomitant Fermi, IRIS and AIA observations.
HXR energy flux {#sec:uv_vs_hxr}
---------------
The close temporal correlation of HXR and UV emission during flares has long been recognized [see e.g. @1981ApJ...248L..39C; @1988ApJ...330..480C], and is generally understood in terms of both signatures being produced by the impulsive heating of the lower atmosphere from precipitating non-thermal electrons. Observations with higher spatial resolution have however clarified how the global UV emission curves result from the staggered occurrence of multiple flaring kernels, each one displaying a similar evolution of UV emission, with a rapidly rising phase and a much longer cooling decay [@2010ApJ...725..319Q; @2012ApJ...752..124Q see also Fig. \[fig:ribbon\] below]. Details of the actual energy deposition are encoded mainly in the rising phase of such “individual” curves.
We exploit this property of the UV emission by computing the running difference of the IRIS 2796Å SJIs at their original cadence of 19 s, with the idea that every flaring area undergoing heating would be clearly recognized in such difference images (the 1400Å images could not be used as overly saturated). Figure \[fig:difference\] shows the difference images for four representative times during the flare development; only the positive intensity changes from the prior image are displayed using an inverted color table with logarithmic scaling; a threshold is used to remove the background noise. Every structure visible in the images represents an area which is either newly activated, or still in the rising phase of the UV curve – hence still experiencing energy input at that given moment. Two contour levels are shown in the difference images: the most intense regions are defined at a change of more than 130 DN, containing between 40-50% of the total intensity change in each image, and displayed in green, while the weaker enhancements of the ribbon chromosphere are shown in black at a level of 9 DN, approximately 5 times the noise — as determined from the average counts in an area free of ribbon emission in the bottom-left corner.
For any given time, we computed the area of the flaring sources from the total number of new pixels within each of these contours. Note that a further correction is required to take into account the small part of the ribbon area that is not imaged by IRIS SJIs (see Figure \[fig:irisaia\]); to this end we introduce a factor determined from the ribbon area at the 2000 DN level in the AIA 1600Å image acquired closest in time. In the 17:20 and 17:50 UT interval this factor varies between 1.0 and 1.2.
![Positive running difference of SJI 2796Å images for four representative times during the flare development (inverted, log intensity scale). Green and black contours represent 130 and 9 DN intensity change, respectively. A reduced FOV surrounding the most intense part of the flare ribbon is shown (cf. Fig. \[fig:irisaia\]); the IRIS slit is visible as the black line.[]{data-label="fig:difference"}](difference.eps){width="10cm"}
A strong correlation exists between the “active” ribbon area and the HXR emission. This is apparent in Figure \[fig:uv\_hxr\], where the area (in cm$^2$) calculated from the strongest contours of Fig. \[fig:difference\] is plotted alongside the 50-100 keV emission from Fermi. In particular, during the central portion of the impulsive phase of the flare (17:26:30 – 17:32:30 UT) most HXR bursts correspond to new peaks in the area curve. The relationship is tight in the temporal sense, but not in amplitude: at times relatively modest enhancements in the HXR emission might correspond to large increases in area (cf. the interval 17:29–17:30 UT), while at others the opposite occurs (interval 17:30:30–17:31:30 UT). The main point of Fig. \[fig:uv\_hxr\] is then a confirmation of the results of @2010ApJ...725..319Q [@2012ApJ...752..124Q] reported above, i.e. that the UV emission in any given area can be meaningfully correlated with the HXR signal, as a tell-tale of accelerated electrons impacting the chromosphere, only during its rising phase.
An average beam energy flux at any given time during the flare can be estimated using the flaring area values calculated above. Given the temporal evolution of the power in the non-thermal electrons as derived in the previous Section, and the two area limits as described above, we find the lower and upper limit to the average flux to be on the order of $\approx 10^{11}-10^{12}~{\rm ergs~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}}$, shown in the bottom panel of Figure \[fig:hxr\_fit\_parameters\]. These are rather high fluxes, at the limit of what current radiative hydro-dynamical simulations assume for typical solar flaring conditions. Yet, values of fluxes of the order of several $10^{11} {\rm ergs~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}}$ are also derived in recent papers that utilize high spatial resolution UV and optical data .
From the curves of Fig. \[fig:uv\_hxr\] we realize that there is no obvious reason for the HXR spectrum to be self-similar in each flaring kernel at any given time, so injection energy rates could be widely different than the spatial averages just derived. However, during the interval most relevant for our analysis (17:29:48 - 17:31:41 UT), the flaring area directly sampled by the IRIS slit was the brightest UV emitter and, as mentioned in Sect. \[sec:flare\_description\], its intensity accounted for 15-20% of the total 2796 Å SJI counts, while accounting for only $\sim$1% of the total area. For this reason we think that a flux value of few $\times 10^{11} ~{\rm ergs~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}}$ is a reasonable assumption, although higher fluxes cannot be excluded.
![Newly activated kernel area in comparison with the Fermi 50-100 keV lightcurve (normalized and scaled to the plot window). The area was taken from 2796Å SJIs at the level of the green and black contours in Figure \[fig:difference\] and includes a correction for the missing ribbon area seen in the AIA 1600Å images.[]{data-label="fig:uv_hxr"}](diffarea_hxr_rev.eps){width="9cm"}
Duration of energy release {#sec:duration}
--------------------------
Both Figure \[fig:difference\] and Figure \[fig:uv\_hxr\] highlight how each HXR bursts might pertain to multiple, separate locations, that rapidly evolve during the flare development. Since the duration of heating in any one of these ribbon pixels can not be directly determined without spatially resolved HXR imaging, we use the UV light-curve as a proxy, as mentioned above.
Shown in Figure \[fig:ribbon\] is an example of a single pixel light-curve of the total Fe [ii]{} 2814.45Å line intensity (a sum of the spectrum between 2814.24Å and 2815.0Å). Following @2012ApJ...752..124Q, we fit the rise side of each pixel’s light curve, from background to peak intensity, with a Gaussian profile, and assume its full Gaussian width as the heating time for that pixel.
Most of the 81 flaring pixels return a good fit, but to determine an average heating time we consider only pixels with a reduced $\chi^{2}$ between 0.5 and 5. A histogram of the relevant Gaussian widths is shown, in units of seconds, in the right hand panel of Figure \[fig:ribbon\]. The median width is $\sim$22 s, with the peak in the histogram around 15 seconds. We will thus assume a heating duration of $\sim$20 s in our modeling. This is consistent with the recent work of @2016ApJ...827...38R and @2017ApJ...836...12K, that also analyze high resolution IRIS spectra of an X-class flare.
![Left panel: example lightcurve of normalised Fe [ii]{} 2814.45Å intensity (stepped line) with a Gaussian fit (smooth line) to the data prior to the peak; the same pixel as in Figure \[fig:spectraA\]. Right panel: histogram of fitted Gaussian widths in seconds, for fits with reduced $\chi^{2} \geq 0.5~{\rm and}~\chi^{2} \leq 5$.[]{data-label="fig:ribbon"}](timeinput_rev.eps){width="9cm"}
Model {#sec:models}
=====
Initial set up {#sec:models_setup}
--------------
We modeled the impulsive phase of the SOL2014-09-10T17:45 event using the RADYN flare code [@1997ApJ...481..500C; @2015ApJ...809..104A]. The code solves the time-independent Fokker-Planck (F-P) equation for a prescribed injected particle beam distribution, given the charge and mass of the beam particle, the initial pitch-angle distribution in the downward hemisphere, the power-law index, the low-energy cutoff value, and the energy flux density at the top of a model 1D magnetic loop consisting of a photosphere, chromosphere, and corona. Following the analysis of Sects. \[sec:fermi\] and \[sec:uv\_vs\_hxr\], we use a flare model with the following electron beam parameters: $\delta$=5, E$_c$ = 15 keV, and energy flux of $10^{11} ~{\rm ergs~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}}$ (F11). The energy input lasted 20s. The model QS.SL.HT of @2015ApJ...809..104A was used for the pre-flare atmosphere, as it was closest to the observed plage environment. Several improvements have been made to the RADYN flare code since [@2015ApJ...809..104A], which are worth noting here [they will be described further in @2020_allred_inprep in prep]. The hydrogen broadening from [@2017ApJ...837..125K] and [@2009ApJ...696.1755T] have been included in the dynamic simulations (Kowalski et al. in prep.). The QS.SL.HT model was relaxed with this new hydrogen broadening, and we choose to use the X-ray back-heating formulation from [@2005ApJ...630..573A] for these models; the resulting pre-flare apex temperature is 1.8 MK, with electron density $5.1 \times 10^{9} ~{\rm ~cm^{-3}}$. Finally, we used a new version of the F-P solver, which gives a moderately smoother electron beam energy deposition profile over height in the upper chromosphere.
To properly compare the model results with the observations, we then synthesized the Fe [ii]{} 2814.45Å line at different times within the evolution of the flare. As shown by @2017ApJ...836...12K [@2019ApJ...878..135K], this line is an important diagnostic in flares because the intensity originates from a similar temperature range, with a broad peak around $T\sim12,000$ K, as the hydrogen Balmer bound-free radiation that dominates the IRIS NUV spectral range. Further, the line can be efficiently synthesized in LTE, by using snapshots of the non-equilibrium ionization, electron density and velocity stratification from RADYN [@2017ApJ...836...12K], and non-LTE temperature. Stronger, optically thick lines, including the Mg [ii]{} triplet lines, require a more careful treatment, which is beyond the scope of this paper [cf. e.g., @2019ApJ...879...19Z].
The calculation of Fe [ii]{} profiles remains the same as in [@2017ApJ...836...12K], except that we account for the upper photospheric ($z<150$ km) Mg [ii]{} wing opacity in LTE. This provides a more accurate contrast of the chromospheric flare radiation against the upper photospheric (non-flaring) emission. This is important for assessing faint line emission from the chromosphere, such as the Fe [ii]{} line. [@2019ApJ...879...19Z] show that even a 30$\times$ increase in the expected Stark broadening of the Mg [ii]{} line produces very little wing emission at wavelengths $>2806$Å in the flare chromosphere [see Figure 4(a) in @2019ApJ...878..135K], thus we expect minimal influence in the Fe [ii]{} window. Finally, for simplicity, a micro-turbulence parameter was not included in the broadening prescription of the Fe [ii]{} 2814.45Å line.
{width="\textwidth" height="12cm"}
Model results {#sec:models_results}
-------------
Using the prescriptions described above, we calculated the spectra of the Fe [ii]{} 2814.45Å line at every 0.1 s in the simulations, and averaged them over the exposure time of the NUV IRIS data during the flare, i.e. 2.4 s. The resulting spectra are displayed in Fig. \[fig:syntheticspectra\] for the whole duration of the impulsive phase, i.e. 20 s. The pre-flare intensity is not subtracted and is shown as a thin, black dotted line. During the whole evolution, the Fe [ii]{} 2814.45Å line (both components, see below) remains optically thin, as was the case for the flare described in @2017ApJ...836...12K. Several important observational features appear to be reproduced by the model. First, the modeled continuum intensity varies from a pre-flare value of $\sim0.5$ to a maximum value of $\sim 1\times 10^6$ erg cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$sr$^{-1}$Å$^{-1}$ at 10–20 s into the flare; this is in good agreement with the observed continuum value and its enhancement (cf. Fig. \[fig:spectraA\] and Figs. \[fig:spectraA\_16\] and \[fig:spectraA\_52\] in Appendix \[sec:appendixA\]). Second, the modeled Fe [ii]{} 2814.45Å line goes into emission almost instantaneously as the flare develops, and reaches a maximum intensity of $\sim 4\times 10^6$ erg cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$sr$^{-1}$Å$^{-1}$, which is again consistent with the observed intensity values. Finally, the modeled spectra show the rapid development of a strong red-shifted additional component to the line, corresponding to a velocity of $\sim 40$ km s$^{-1}$, that appears just a few seconds into the flare. This second component evolves very rapidly, and becomes dominant with respect to the stationary component (still in emission) while decelerating at the same time: only 10 s after its first appearance, its velocity had decreased to $\sim 10$ km s$^{-1}$.
The existence of a second, red-shifted spectral component, and its dynamical evolution well resemble the behavior displayed by the observed IRIS spectral lines (Figs. \[fig:ltspec\] and \[fig:spectraA\]). A similar dynamical evolution of the Fe [ii]{} line has been discussed by @2017ApJ...836...12K for the case of a stronger flare (5F11, $\delta$=4.2), and explained with the development of a strong chromospheric condensation (see Sect. \[sec:discussion\] below); however, our data allows a more detailed comparison with the whole condensation evolution, thanks to their high cadence and the availability of multiple flaring kernels observed continuously from the earliest stages.
Some discrepancies remain between the data and the modeled spectra, that might point to necessary modifications of the models and/or the spectral synthesis. From the dynamical point of view, the evolution of the synthetic line intensity, especially that of the red-shifted component, appears sensibly faster than in the observations. In Fig. \[fig:syntheticspectra\] the red-shifted component appears just a few seconds after the heating starts, with an intensity comparable to that of the stationary component. The data, on the other hand, show a more gradual enhancement of both the stationary and red-shifted components, with the latter matching the stationary component intensity only over $\sim$ 30 s. The deceleration of the red-shifted component in the data also appears slower than in the model, with a typical decay time of $\sim$ 30 s (Fig. \[fig:condensation\]) vs. the $\sim$ 10 s of the simulations. Finally, the data show a build-up (over a period of 10-20 s) towards the maximum red-shift, at odds with the instantaneous appearance of the second component in the simulated spectral profiles; this effect is better visible for the stronger lines like Mg [ii]{} and C [i]{} (Fig. \[fig:condensation\]). This could merit further investigation in the context of flare precursors that are often reported [e.g. @2017ApJ...840..116B].
The intensity of the second component relative to the stationary one also appears larger in the synthesized lines with respect to the observations (cf. Fig. \[fig:spectraA\]), with instances of the synthetic red-shifted component being about twice the observed one. This might be related to another discrepancy, namely that the width of the synthetic lines remains sensibly smaller than observed, especially for the red-shifted component, even when accounting for Van der Waals and quadratic Stark broadening in the calculation (opacity broadening is naturally included in the LTE line synthesis). As the simulations do not include a micro turbulence parameter or reproduce the full range of strong, flare-induced turbulent motions in the chromosphere [@2011ApJ...740...70M] it is plausible that flare energy is redistributed into higher intensity, but narrower, line profiles.
Discussion {#sec:discussion}
==========
Using the complete description of the physical properties within the simulated flaring atmosphere, we can investigate the origin of the most distinctive observational feature reported above, namely the presence of two separate spectral components for the Fe [ii]{} 2814.45Å line, each with very different dynamical behaviors. Following the discussion of @2017ApJ...836...12K, we confirm that these features are due to the concomitant action of accelerated electrons of different energy impinging on the chromosphere. In particular, the highest energy electrons in our simulated beam ($ E >$50 keV, increasing to $ E >$80 keV later in the flare evolution) penetrate the deeper, denser layers of the chromosphere and rapidly heat it to temperatures $\sim 10,000$ K, producing both an enhanced continuum emission and a strongly enhanced emission in the line (“stationary flare layers"). The bulk of the beam’s energy, however, resides in electrons of lower energy (E $= 15-50$ keV) that are stopped in the higher, more rarefied atmosphere. This causes the development of an explosive chromospheric evaporation and its counterpart condensation, a downward moving high density front ($n_e \sim 2 \times 10^{14}~{\rm cm^{-3}}$), with a thickness of only 30–40 km, and a temperature of $T\sim 8000-12000$ K. This layer becomes sufficiently dense as to produce additional emission in both the continuum and the chromospheric spectral lines, resulting in a separate, red-shifted component that traces the downward motion of the condensation towards the stationary chromosphere and its rapid demise. Figure \[fig:contributionfunction\] illustrates the situation at 6.5 s within the flare development: while the stationary component (at v = 0 km s$^{-1}$) is formed within $\sim$ 200 km in the mid chromosphere, a very strong contribution appears in the condensation, concentrated in the upper 30–40 km of the atmosphere, at the red-shifted position of v $\sim$ 30 km s$^{-1}$. From the simulations, we find that this moving, dense front lasts only a few tens of seconds, as it impacts onto the stationary chromosphere of ever increasing density.
![Contribution function (in units of erg cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$sr$^{-1}$Å$^{-1}$cm$^{-1}$) of the Fe [ii]{} 2814.45Å line at 6.5 s within the development of the flare. The x-axis is given in units of velocity rather than wavelength. The chromospheric condensation is clearly visible in the upper part of the graph, from $h \sim$ 870–900 km, as the locus of a much enhanced contribution function at longer wavelengths, which gives rise to the red-shifted component.[]{data-label="fig:contributionfunction"}](feii_contribution.eps){width="9cm"}
The parameters of the beam of accelerated electrons have an obvious relationship with observable quantities, with the energy cutoff E$_c$, spectral index $\delta$, and total flux F all playing different roles in the creation of the chromospheric signatures, and of the chromospheric condensation in particular [e.g. @2015ApJ...808..177R]. For the case of our flare, as discussed in Sects. \[sec:fermi\] and \[sec:uv\_areas\], in the thick target approximation the spectral index of the beam is rather well determined, while the low energy cut-off could plausibly vary between 15 and 25 keV; the total flux of non-thermal electrons is also determined within about an order of magnitude (cf. Fig. \[fig:hxr\_fit\_parameters\]). As an additional check, we thus ran some further models, keeping constant the spectral index of the beam ($\delta=$ 5) and the heating duration (20 s), while varying the low energy cutoff (E$_c=$ 15, 18, 20, 25 keV) and the total flux (F = 1, 5 $\times 10^{11} ~{\rm ergs~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}}$; F11, 5F11). The Fe [ii]{} 2814.45Å line was then synthesized as described in the previous section.
None of the additional models reproduced the data as closely as the model shown in Fig. \[fig:syntheticspectra\], reinforcing the case for an electron beam with a relatively low value of $E_c$, and a moderate flux. In particular, for the models with higher cutoff energy E$_c$ (20-25 keV) the condensation becomes sensibly weaker, and develops later, with respect to what observed. On the other hand, a sensibly higher beam flux (5F11) produces not only a much stronger condensation, but also a much higher continuum value than observed (a factor of several), already in the very early instants of the flare. The combined diagnostics provided by the continuum intensity in the Fe [ii]{} line spectral range, and the strength of the condensation, appears thus to be particularly valuable in constraining the model parameters (note that the continuum near the Mg [ii]{} lines usually can be determined with much less precision, due to the very extended wings of the line). Still, the second component intensity remains sensibly higher than the stationary one irrespectively of different E$_c$ values, for both the F11 and 5F11 beams. As discussed in the previous section, this is not consistent with observational data; further investigation will be necessary to determine the source of this discrepancy.
Summary and Conclusions {#sec:conclusion}
=======================
Expanding on our previous work [@Graham:2015aa Paper I], we have studied the details of chromospheric dynamics during the impulsive phase of the X1.6 SOL2014-09-10T17:45 event, by employing a comprehensive set of observations and modeling. In particular, the unique set of observations obtained by IRIS allowed us an unprecedented view of the early impulsive phases of the flare, with large spectral coverage, high cadence (9.4 s) and high spatial resolution ($<$1). A novel approach pursued in this work is the use of multiple chromospheric diagnostics available in IRIS spectra, including some weak Fe [i]{} and Fe [ii]{} lines that are seldom employed. These lines go into clear emission in strong ribbon kernels, but never saturate, contrary to other diagnostics such as the widely used Mg [ii]{} lines. Further, the Fe lines remain optically thin during the flare development, hence simplifying their interpretation.
Our main findings are as follows:
1\. Using several, diverse spectral lines (Figs. \[fig:spectraA\], \[fig:spectraB\], and \[fig:spectraA\_16\]–\[fig:spectraB\_52\]), we confirm that the chromospheric dynamics in the impulsive phase of this flare appears identically in multiple, independent flaring kernels, developing at successive times, separated by as much as several minutes and $\sim$10 (Fig. \[fig:ltspec\], bottom panel). This represents a best-case scenario for comparison with (1-D) numerical models of flaring loops.
2\. For any given flaring kernel, in the earliest instants of activation all the chromospheric lines show a clear double-component structure, with an enhanced spectral line centered at the rest wavelength, and a strongly red-shifted component at $ \Delta \lambda \sim $40 km s$^{-1}$. Their relative intensities and position evolve within a few tens of seconds, with the re-shifted component rapidly decelerating until the two components merge in an apparently single, very broad and asymmetric line. Such a behavior had been observed sporadically before [@2015ApJ...811..139T], but was never reported so comprehensively during its complete evolution.
3\. The temporal evolution of the redshifted component appears very similar for all spectral lines, and all flaring kernels (Fig. \[fig:condensation\]), with a timescale of $\sim$ 30 s. This behavior is consistent with the presence of a strong chromospheric condensation, as first modeled by @1985ApJ...289..414F [@Fisher:1986aa].
4\. Adopting the standard thick-target approach, we use co-temporary HXR observations by the Fermi satellite as well as relevant IRIS diagnostics to derive the parameters of a beam of accelerated electrons impinging on the chromosphere. While the beam is not particularly hard ($\delta =5$), we find both a low energy cut-off value (E$_c \sim 15 - 20$ keV), and a fairly high energy flux (F =10$^{11}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$), which combine into a strong heating of the chromosphere. Using these parameters as input to the RADYN flare code [@1997ApJ...481..500C; @2015ApJ...809..104A], we find that the low chromosphere is rapidly heated by the highest energy electrons, while the bulk of the electron beam’s energy is dissipated at higher layers. The latter causes the rapid development of an explosive chromospheric evaporation and its counterpart condensation, with maximum velocity $\sim$ 50 km s$^{-1}$. The condensation is sufficiently dense to give rise to additional continuum emission, as well as to highly red-shifted components of the analyzed chromospheric lines. The downward motion of the modeled condensation lasts only a few tens of seconds. 5. To properly compare the results of the simulation with the actual data, we synthesize the Fe [ii]{} 2814.45Å line profile in different snapshots of the resulting atmosphere, averaging over time in a manner consistent with the actual IRIS exposures [see also @2017ApJ...836...12K]. The synthetic Fe [ii]{} profiles (Fig. \[fig:syntheticspectra\]) reproduce many of the observed characteristics, including the presence of two separate spectral components and their initial separation, as well as the continuum enhancement in the Fe [ii]{} window. As discussed in Sect. \[sec:discussion\], the redshifted spectral component and the excess continuum are produced in the condensation described above (point 4), while the stationary component is enhanced because of the heating of the deeper layers due to the penetration of the highest energy electrons. We also find that the continuum intensity in the Fe [ii]{} spectral window is an important additional constraint on the details of the energy release, as it is rather sensitive to the beam parameters (Section \[sec:discussion\]). The main inconsistencies between the model and the data include a sensibly faster temporal evolution, a larger relative intensity, and a reduced width of the red-shifted component in the simulations, with respect to observations. This could be further investigated by adopting a different initial atmosphere in the simulation, and analyzing the possible role of turbulent flows in the chromospheric condensation, that could possibly influence both the width and intensity of the re-shifted component (cf. Sect. \[sec:discussion\]).
6\. For some flaring kernels there are indications of a short “build-up” phase towards the maximum red-shift of the condensation component, well visible in the Mg [ii]{} 2791.6Å panel of Fig. \[fig:condensation\]. This is not predicted by the hydro-dynamical simulations, and could be related to the details of a “precursor” phase observed in some instances. However, we have not performed a systematic analysis of the possible effects of noise and/or the instrumental PSF in producing this signature. Recently, using a time dependent, non-equilibrium approach to calculate the atomic level populations, [@2019ApJ...885..119K] have shown that the Mg [ii]{} k line becomes slightly red-shifted before the impulsive condensation response (their Fig. 2a). This could be an interesting avenue of further investigation.
As a final curiosity, the slight and short-lived blueshift visible in Fig. \[fig:ltspec\] after the condensation dies down, appears to represent a rebound of the stationary chromosphere once hit by the condensation, and is reproduced in some RHD simulations like those of @2016ApJ...827..145R [their Fig. 2].
We conclude by remarking that the combination of multiple diagnostics, including HXR emission, UV spectra and continuum intensities, and UV imaging, as well as their temporal evolution, allowed us to strongly constrain the heating and hydrodynamical properties of the impulsive phase of the SOL2014-09-10T17:45 flare. The excellent agreement between multiple observed spectral properties and the results of the 1-D RHD simulations strongly suggests that for this flare we are close to spatially and temporally resolving the impulsive phase of [*elementary flare kernels*]{}, each one occurring on previously undisturbed chromospheric areas. In particular, our data does not appear to require any multi-thread scenario of the kind often invoked to explain various flare characteristics, including how the chromospheric emission and/or dynamics of spatially resolved flare foot-points can proceed for a sensibly longer time than predicted by impulsive heating models [e.g. @2016ApJ...827..145R; @2016ApJ...820...14Q].
In our study, however, we focused exclusively on the earliest moments of the energization of the chromosphere caused by a strong electron beam (energy flux $\sim 10^{11}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$), and the resulting classical explosive evaporation scenario as described by @1989ApJ...346.1019F. For the longer term chromospheric response, we note that the curves of integrated emission of the Fe [ii]{} line described in Sect. \[sec:duration\] and Fig. \[fig:ribbon\] are tantalizingly similar to the AIA 1600Å curves shown by @2012ApJ...752..124Q for a different flare (albeit with a vastly different timescale, over 10 times shorter), both showing a sharp peak and a much extended “gradual” phase, although new work suggests that care should be taken in interpreting the AIA 1600Å channel [@2019ApJ...870..114S]. Whether this behavior is due to the normal cooling of the atmosphere after the flaring episode, or to a two-stage heating process as discussed by @2016ApJ...820...14Q, will be investigated in a future research.
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 606862 (F-CHROMA). DG acknowledges support by NASA under contract NNG09FA40C ([*IRIS*]{}). AFK acknowledges support from NASA Helio GI Grant NNX17AD62G. PJS has received funding from FAPESP (grant 2013/24155-3). IRIS is a NASA small explorer mission developed and operated by LMSAL with mission operations executed at NASA Ames Research center and major contributions to downlink communications funded by the Norwegian Space Center (NSC, Norway) through an ESA PRODEX contract. The National Solar Observatory (NSO) is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc. (AURA), under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation. The article benefited from discussions at the International Space Science Institute (ISSI) during a meeting “Magnetic Waves in Solar Flares: Beyond the Standard Flare Model”. Several of the plots use the colourblind friendly tables provided by [@colourpjw].
Additional Spectra {#sec:appendixA}
==================
The spectra shown in Figs. \[fig:spectraA\] and \[fig:spectraB\] illustrate a particularly clear example of the presence of a red-shifted component, and its temporal evolution, during the impulsive phase of the flare, but are well representative of many flaring positions along the slit. To support the analysis of Section \[sec:chrom\_spectra\] we show in Figs \[fig:spectraA\_16\] – \[fig:spectraB\_52\] the corresponding spectra for two additional pixel locations, marked by blue diamonds in the bottom panel of Fig. \[fig:ltspec\]. Each spectral range is shown for five consecutive times starting from the impulsive rise (note the different activation times in different pixels), and well displays the formation of the red satellite component, and its migration back towards the rest component. The samples are taken from 3.3 and 2.7 above and below the spectra of Figs. \[fig:spectraA\] and Fig. \[fig:spectraB\] — beyond the influence of the point spread function described in Appendix \[sec:appendixB\] below.
{width="16cm"}
{width="18cm"}
{width="16cm"}
{width="18cm"}
Effects of the IRIS Point Spread Function {#sec:appendixB}
=========================================
The progression of the ribbon(s) in the SOL2014-09-10T17:45 flare is such that the activation of separate flaring pixels along the slit occurs in a sequential fashion, thus separating in space and time the short-lived kernels, and creating the diagonal intensity streak shown in the lower panel of Figure \[fig:ltspec\].
However, one must be conscious of possible effects of the Point Spread Function (PSF) of the instrument, which could alter the behavior of adjacent pixels, especially in the presence of strong intensity gradients. In particular, an intensity cross-talk along the slit might mimic the activation of a new kernel following a particularly bright kernel, or falsely prolong the duration of a flow in a previously activated pixel. Indeed, close inspection of the space-time plot in Figure \[fig:ltspec\] shows a general tendency to bright structures being elongated in the slit direction, an effect most apparent for $\sim$1-2 below the brightest pixels at y$=$119.
[@2018SoPh..293...20A] report on the stray-light measured along the direction of the slit in observations of the limb, and determine an upper limit to the IRIS PSF of 0.73 (FWHM), i.e. approx. 4-5 IRIS pixels. For the flaring kernels displayed in Fig. \[fig:ltspec\], the intensity appears to spread further than the nominal NUV spatial resolution of 0.4[@2014SoPh..289.2733D], but the smears weaken quickly (in space), compared to the kernel core. For example, for the brightest pixel within the red diamonds’ sequence, moving 1 downward along the slit quickly reduces the fitted intensity of the Fe [ii]{} line to 38% of the peak, and to 15% when moving 2 .
Still, we attempted a correction of these effects, using the deconvolution method described by [@2018SoPh..293..125C], who took advantage of a Mercury transit to precisely determine the PSF of IRIS. Figure \[fig:deconv\] shows the results. While the deconvolution algorithm clears some of the stray light and sharpens the resulting intensity (Panel (b)), the variations for the flaring pixels are not substantial, especially for what concerns the temporal development. More important, we found that the algorithm introduces additional noise in the spectral profiles, making the complex multi-Gaussian fits that we use quite unstable. Thus, rather than create a new, unquantified source of error, we acknowledge that some amount of stray-light may leak into the rise phase of pixels southward (lower y-values along the slit) of a strong kernel. Given the thresholds used in our fitting routines, and the fact that spectra measured in weaker flaring kernels (including those identified with blue diamonds in Fig. \[fig:ltspec\], and presented in Figs. \[fig:spectraA\_16\] to \[fig:spectraB\_52\]), are qualitatively and quantitatively very similar to those acquired in the brightest pixel, we believe that this leak has only a minor effect on our results.
Spectral Bisectors {#sec:appendixC}
==================
As described in Sect. \[sec:models\_results\], and similar to the case discussed in @2017ApJ...836...12K, the Fe [ii]{} 2814.4Å line remains optically thin during the flare, thus justifying the use of two separate Gaussians to describe the dynamics and evolution of the different flare components. The fact that a similar analysis appears valid also for the Mg [ii]{} 2791.6Å line (cf. Fig. \[fig:condensation\] and Sect. \[sec:chrom\_time\]), allows us important insights into the use of bisectors, a common method used to estimate the velocity of the condensation when using strong, optically thick lines.
Following Ichimoto & Kurokawa’s ([[email protected]]) explanation of the H$\alpha$ red wing “excess” as due to a very broad, red-shifted component formed in an optically thin condensation, @1990ApJ...348..333C first introduced the use of bisectors, measured in the extreme wings of that line, to derive the amplitude of the motions. In their work, @1990ApJ...348..333C pointed out that the positions of the bisectors should be intensity-independent, as the emission in the extreme wings would be produced only in the condensation. Yet, for most flares this was not observed, with the bisectors’ position at low intensities usually increasing to ever longer wavelengths. For this reason it became customary to estimate the velocity of the condensation using the maximum bisector position [@1990ApJ...348..333C], or that measured at around 20-30% of the peak line intensity [e.g. @1992ApJ...384..341W; @Ding:1995aa; @Graham:2015aa] , but without providing sound physical reasons for this practice.[^2]
The Mg [ii]{} panels in Fig. \[fig:spectraB\] (and Figs \[fig:spectraB\_16\] and \[fig:spectraB\_52\] in Appendix \[sec:appendixA\]) offer guidance for the analysis of optically thick, flaring spectral lines. The small squares in the plots identify the bisectors’ position measured at 10% intensity intervals, and illustrate how the bisectors’ position can be indeed influenced by a complex mix of the parameters of the two spectral components, including the particular phase of the evolution at which the spectra are acquired. As a general statement, in the earliest stages of the condensation the bisectors’ position will be observed to increase continuously at lower line intensities, as the red-shifted component is quite weaker than the stationary component (top panels in the figures). On the other hand, when the intensity of the red-shifted component becomes comparable, or even larger, than that of the stationary component, it will dominate the signal in both wings thus producing an intensity-independent bisector. This suggests that many of the reported odd-shapes of strong chromospheric lines in flares are due to the vagaries of the observations - essentially which evolutionary stage was sampled in which flaring kernel [many flare studies suffer from less than optimal cadence of the observations. e.g. @2015ApJ...806....9K].
Given the excellent coverage of the impulsive phase of this flare provided by the IRIS data, we are in a unique position to test the validity of the bisector method, in comparison with the actual position of the red-shifted component during the flare impulsive phase. Figure \[fig:bisec\_comp\] shows a scatterplot of the two quantities for the Mg [ii]{} line, comparing the bisector position measured at 10% (left panel) and 30% of the overall maximum line intensity (right panel) with the position of the second spectral component derived from the fits. To this end we used the same pixels and spectral fits that enter Fig. \[fig:condensation\]. The gray scale provides the number of sampled spectra that fall within each 2 km s$^{-1}$ bin.
The agreement in Fig. \[fig:bisec\_comp\] is remarkable for the bisector values measured at the 10% level, with a correlation higher than 0.95. For the 30% bisector level, the scatter becomes larger, although the correlation remains very high, at 0.88 (this is driven mostly by the low velocity pixels, identified as the darker bins in the scatterplot; for the pixel/times when the measured bisector velocity is $\ge$ 20 km s$^{-1}$, the correlation decreases to 0.75). For higher bisector levels (not shown), the correlation with the chromospheric condensation is progressively lost. Thus, we conclude that the bisector values can provide a reasonable, [*lower*]{} limit to the actual condensation velocities, provided they are measured at low-enough intensities.
{width="12cm"}
Finally, we note that to date, most studies of chromospheric condensation have been conducted using strong, optically thick lines such as H$\alpha$, Ca [ii]{} H&K, or the Mg [ii]{} h&k . For such broad lines, most often the two spectral components will appear blended together, as the red-shift of the condensation does not exceed the natural width of the line, thus giving the appearance of a single, broad, and very asymmetric line (cf. e.g. the last two Mg [ii]{} panels in Fig. \[fig:spectraB\]). This has led to some attempts to interpret the asymmetries as due to a depth-dependent velocity field within the flaring chromosphere ; yet, as shown by , the asymmetries can not be consistently reproduced in models assuming the formation of a single line over a large atmospheric span, even after including an ad-hoc velocity field in the mid-chromosphere. The results of our simulations offer a clear explanation of why this is the case.
[^1]: The IRIS technical notes can be found at http://iris.lmsal.com/documents.html.
[^2]: Note that neither @1984SoPh...93..105I nor @1990ApJ...348..333C commented on the strength of the stationary components and its possible variations.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'Let $E$ be a level 1, vector valued Eisenstein series of half-integral weight, normalized so that the coefficients are all in $\mathbb{Z}$. We show that there is a level one vector valued cusp form $f$ with the same weight as $E$ and with coefficients in $\mathbb{Z}$, which is congruent to $E$ modulo the constant term of $E$.'
author:
- Richard Hill
title: 'Weights of modular forms on $\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$ and congruences between Eisenstein series and cusp forms of half-integral weight on $\mathrm{SL}_{2}$'
---
Introduction
============
Recall that the Ramanujan $\tau$ function satisfies the congruence $$\tau(n) \equiv \sigma_{11}(n) \bmod 691,\quad
\sigma_{11}(n)=\sum_{d|n}d^{11}.$$ In another notation, this says that the weight 12 level 1 holomorphic Eisenstein series $G_{12}$, is congruent modulo 691, to the cusp form $\Delta$. In fact it is known, that for any holomorphic Eisenstein series $G$ of integral weight $k$ and arbitrary level $N$, and normalized so as to have integer coefficients, there is a cusp form $f$ of the same weight, with integer coefficients, such that $$f\equiv G \bmod d,$$ where $d$ denotes the constant term of $G$. Congruences of this kind have applications in Bloch-Kato type conjectures, since the Galois representations corresponding to the cusp forms can be used to construct non-trivial elements in certain Selmer groups (this phenomenon is explained in the introduction to [@brown]).
In this paper we shall prove a similar congruence result (Theorem \[main\]) in the context of vector-valued forms of integral or half-integral weight on $\mathrm{Mp}_{2}(\mathbb{Z})$. Only a few such congruences have been proved for half-integral weight (see [@AntoniadisKohnen], [@koblitz]). The method previously used in the half-integral weight cases was to deduce congruences in half-integral weight from those of integral weight using the Shimura correspondence The proof in this paper is rather simple, given the prerequisites, and is entirely different from previous proofs of similar results; it works equally well in both integral and half-integral weights.
To see how the congruence arises, recall that a Borcherds lift is à-priori a rational weight meromorphic form on an orthogonal group $\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$ with respect to some arithmetic subgroup $\Gamma$ (see [@bruinier]). Using an idea of Deligne [@deligne1] we show that if the congruence kernel of the pre-image of $\Gamma$ in $\mathrm{Spin}(2,l)$ is trivial, then there only exist half-integral weight multiplier systems on $\Gamma$. Hence, using Kneser’s calculation [@kneser] of the congruence kernels of Spinor groups, we show (see Theorem \[orthogonalweights\] below) that all forms on $\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$ have at most half-integral weight. Consequently Borcherds lifts in fact have half-integral weight. However, Borcherds lifts are constructed from certain weakly holomorphic vector valued forms on $\mathrm{SL}_{2}$. The weight of the Borcherds lift is precisely half the constant term of the weakly holomorphic form. As the weight is a half-integer, we deduce that the constant term is an integer. This fact can be reinterpreted in terms of holomorphic forms on $\mathrm{SL}_{2}$ to give the required congruence.
This paper was written while the author was a visiting Ulam professor in the University of Colorado at Boulder. I’d like that thank the Department of Pure Mathematics at Boulder, especially Prof. Lynne Walling, for their hospitality. I’d also like to thank Prof. Kevin Buzzard for a useful discussion.
Statement of the result
=======================
Let $\mathcal{H}$ denote the upper half-plane with the usual action of $\mathrm{SL}_{2}(\mathbb{R})$. Following [@bruinier] we realise the metaplectic group $\mathrm{Mp}_{2}(\mathbb{R})$ as the set of pairs $(g,\phi)$, where $g=\left(\begin{matrix}a&b\\c&d\end{matrix}\right)\in \mathrm{SL}_{2}(\mathbb{R})$ and $\phi:\mathcal{H}\to\mathbb{C}^{\times}$ is a continuous function such that $\phi(\tau)^{2}=c\tau+d$. The group operation in $\mathrm{Mp}_{2}(\mathbb{R})$ is given by $$(g,\phi)(h,\psi) := (gh, (\phi\circ h)\cdot \psi ).$$ There is an obvious projection $\mathrm{Mp}_{2}(\mathbb{R})\to \mathrm{SL}_{2}(\mathbb{R})$ and there is a short exact sequence $$1 \to \mu_{2} \to \mathrm{Mp}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) \to \mathrm{SL}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) \to 1,$$ where $\mu_{2}=\{1,-1\}$ is embedded in $\mathrm{Mp}_{2}(\mathbb{R})$ by $\epsilon\mapsto (I_{2},\epsilon)$. The centre of $\mathrm{Mp}_{2}(\mathbb{R})$ is $\mu_{2}$.
We shall write $\mathrm{Mp}_{2}(\mathbb{Z})$ for the preimage of $\mathrm{SL}_{2}(\mathbb{Z})$ in $\mathrm{Mp}_{2}(\mathbb{R})$. This group $\mathrm{Mp}_{2}(\mathbb{Z})$ is generated by the following two elements $$T
=
\left(
\left(\begin{matrix}1&1\\0&1\end{matrix}\right),1
\right),\quad
S
=
\left(
\left(\begin{matrix}0&1\\-1&0\end{matrix}\right),\sqrt{\tau}
\right).$$
Let $L$ be lattice over $\mathbb{Z}$ with a $\mathbb{Z}$-valued quadratic form $q:L\to\mathbb{Z}$. We shall assume throughout that $q$ has signature $(2,l)$ with $l\ge 3$. We shall also write $(\cdot,\cdot)$ for the corresponding symmetric bilinear form and $L'$ for the dual lattice: $$q(v)=\frac{1}{2}(v,v),\qquad
L'=\{v\in L\otimes \mathbb{Q} : (v,L)\subseteq\mathbb{Z}\}.$$ We shall consider the vector space $\mathbb{C}[L'/L]$ of complex-valued functions on $L'/L$. For $\alpha\in L'/L$ we let $[\alpha]$ denote the function which takes value $1$ at $\alpha $ and is zero elsewhere. Thus the functions $[\alpha]$ form a basis of $\mathbb{C}[L'/L]$. There is a representation $\varrho$ of $\mathrm{Mp}_{2}(\mathbb{Z})$ on $\mathbb{C}[L'/L]$, which is a special case of the Weil representation (see [@weil]). The representation $\varrho$ is discussed in more detail in [@bruinier] and [@shintani]). On the generators $S$ and $T$, $\varrho$ is given by $$\varrho(S)[\alpha]
=
\frac{1}{\mathfrak{g}}
\sum_{\beta\in L'/L}
\exp(-2\pi i (\beta,\alpha))
\cdot[\beta]
\qquad
\varrho(T)[\alpha]
=
\exp(2\pi i q(\alpha))\cdot[\alpha],$$ where $\mathfrak{g}$ denotes the following Gauss sum: $$\mathfrak{g}
=
\sum_{\alpha\in L'/L}\exp(2\pi i q(\alpha)).$$ Let $k\in\frac{1}{2}\mathbb{Z}$. By a weight $k$, $\mathbb{C}[L'/L]$-valued modular form, we shall mean a holomorphic function $f:\mathcal{H} \to \mathbb{C}[L'/L]$, such that
- for all $(\gamma,\phi)\in \mathrm{Mp}_{2}(\mathbb{Z})$ we have $$f(\gamma \tau)
=
\phi(\tau)^{2k}\cdot \varrho(\gamma,\phi) f(\tau),$$
- $f$ is bounded on the region $\{\tau\in\mathbb{C} : \Im\tau >1\}$.
The first condition implies that $f$ has a Fourier expansion of the form $$f(\tau)
=
\sum_{\alpha\in L'/L}
\sum_{n\in \mathbb{Z}+q(\alpha)}
c(f,n, \alpha)q^{n}
\cdot [\alpha],
\qquad
q=\exp(2\pi i \tau),\qquad
c(f,n, \alpha)\in \mathbb{C},$$ and the second condition implies that $c(f,n, \alpha)=0$ for $n<0$. The form $f$ is called a cusp form if $c(f,n, \alpha)=0$ whenever $n=0$. We shall write $\mathcal{M}_{k,L}$ for the complex vector space of weight $k$ forms, and $\mathcal{S}_{k,L}$ for the subspace of cusp forms.
Suppose $f\in \mathcal{M}_{k,L}$, and expand $f$ in terms of the basis $[\alpha]$: $$f(\tau)
=
\sum_{\alpha\in L'/L}
f_{\alpha}(\tau)\cdot [\alpha].$$ Then each component $f_{\alpha}$ is a (scalar valued) holomorphic modular form of weight $k\in\frac{1}{2}\mathbb{Z}$ for the principal congruence subgroup $\Gamma(N)$, where $N\cdot L'\subseteq L$.
We need the following result of McGraw [@mcgraw]:
\[rationality\] The space $\mathcal{M}_{k,L}$ has a basis of modular forms, all of whose Fourier expansions have only integer coefficients. Similarly, $\mathcal{S}_{k,L}$ has a basis of modular forms, all of whose Fourier expansions have only integer coefficients.
For example, let $k=\frac{1}{2}\mathrm{rank}(L)=1+\frac{l}{2}$ and define: $$E(\tau)
=
\sum_{(\gamma,\phi)\in \tilde\Gamma_{\infty}\backslash \mathrm{Mp}_{2}(\mathbb{Z})}
\phi(\tau)^{-2k}\varrho^{*}(\gamma,\phi)^{-1}[0]$$ This Eisenstein series converges since $k>2$, and is an element of $\mathcal{M}_{1+l/2,L}$. Bruinier and Kuss have shown that the Fourier coefficients $c(E,\beta,n)$ of $E$ are in $\mathbb{Q}$ (see Corollary 8 of [@bruinierkuss]). By Theorem \[rationality\] (or by the above remark, together with results of [@serrestark]) there is a non-zero integer $d$ such that $dE$ has integer coefficients.
The purpose of this paper is to prove the following:
\[main\] Let $E$ be the weight $k>2$ Eisenstein series defined above. Choose $d\in\mathbb{N}$ such that $d\cdot E$ has integer Fourier coefficients. Then there is a weight $k$ cusp for $f$ with integer Fourier coefficients $c(f,n,\alpha)$, such that each coefficient satisfies the congruence: $$c(f,n, \alpha) \equiv c(d\cdot E,n, \alpha)\bmod d.$$
Let $q:\mathbb{Z}^{5}\to\mathbb{Z}$ be given by $$q\left(\begin{matrix}x_{1}\\\vdots\\x_{5}\end{matrix}\right)
=
x_{1}^{2}+x_{2}^{2}-x_{3}^{2}-x_{4}^{2}-x_{5}^{2}.$$ In this case the space $\mathcal{S}_{5/2,L}$ of cusp forms is $\{0\}$. Therefore in this case the Eisenstein series $E$ has coefficients in $\mathbb{Z}$.
Weakly holomorphic modular forms
================================
By a *weakly holomorphic* $\mathbb{C}[L'/L]$-valued modular form we shall mean (following the terminology of [@bruinierfunke]) a holomorphic function $f:\mathcal{H}\to \mathbb{C}[L'/L]$ satisfying condition (A) above, and whose Fourier expansion has at most finitely many non-zero terms $c(f,\alpha,n)$ with $n<0$. We shall write $\mathcal{M}_{k,L}^{!}$ for the space of weight $k$ weakly holomorphic forms. Given an $f\in \mathcal{M}_{k,L}^{!}$, we define the *principle part* of $f$ to be the negative part of its Fourier expansion: $$\sum_{\alpha\in L'/L}\;\;
\sum_{n\in \mathbb{Z}+q(\alpha),\; n<0}
c(f, \alpha,n)\exp(2\pi i n \tau)\cdot [\alpha].$$ It turns out that there exist weakly holomorphic forms with negative weight. We shall be particularly interested in forms of weight $1-\frac{l}{2}$.
The following theorem of Borcherds (Theorem 3.1 of [@borcherds2] or Theorem 1.17 of [@bruinier]) determines which Fourier polynomials arise as principle parts of weakly holomorphic forms:
\[principalpart\] Let $k\in \frac{1}{2}\mathbb{Z}$ and consider a Fourier polynomial of the form $$p(\tau)
=
\sum_{\alpha\in L'/L}\;\;
\sum_{\begin{array}{c}
n\in\mathbb{Z} +q(\alpha),\\
-N\le n<0
\end{array}}
c(\alpha,n)\exp(2\pi i n \tau)\cdot [\alpha].$$ There exists a weakly holomorphic modular form in $\mathcal{M}_{1-k,L}^{!}$ with principle part $p(\tau)$ if and only if for every holomorphic cusp form $f\in \mathcal{S}_{k,L}$ the following holds: $$\sum_{\alpha\in L'/L}\;\;
\sum_{\begin{array}{c}
n\in\mathbb{Z} +q(\alpha),\\
-N\le n<0
\end{array}}
c(\alpha,n) \cdot c(f,\alpha,-n)
=
0.$$
If $f\in \mathcal{M}_{1-l/2,L}^{!}$ is a weakly holomorphic form, then its constant coefficient $c(0,0)$ may be expressed in terms of the principal part as follows (see Remark 3.23 of [@bruinier], ignoring the misprint there): $$\label{constantterm}
c(f,0,0)
=
-\frac{1}{2}
\sum_{\alpha\in L'/L}\;\;
\sum_{\begin{array}{c}
n\in\mathbb{Z} +q(\alpha),\\
n>0
\end{array}}
c(E,\alpha,n) \cdot c(f,\alpha,-n),$$ where $c(E,\alpha,n)$ are the coefficients of the Eisenstein series $E$.
Borcherds lifts to the Orthogonal group
=======================================
Recall that we have a lattice $L$ with a quadratic form $q$ with signature $(2,l)$ ($l\ge 3$). For a field $F$, we extend the bilinear form $(\cdot,\cdot)$ and the quadratic form $q$ from $L$ to quadratic and $F$-bilinear form on $L\otimes_{\mathbb{Z}} F$. Define $$\mathrm{SO}(2,l)
=
\{\sigma\in \mathrm{SL}(V\otimes\mathbb{R}) : q\circ \sigma =q\}.$$ As a Lie group, $\mathrm{SO}(2,l)$ has 2 connected components. The connected component of the identity (which is the kernel of the spinor norm, see [@hahnomeara]) will be denoted $\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$.
To make thinks more precise we shall choose a basis $\{b_{1},\ldots,b_{2+l}\}$ for $L\otimes\mathbb{R}$ such that $$(b_{i},b_{j})
=
\begin{cases}
0&\hbox{if $i\ne j$,}\\
1&\hbox{if $i= j\le 2$,}\\
-1&\hbox{if $i= j> 2$.}
\end{cases}$$ With this choice of basis, we shall regard $\mathrm{SO}(2)\oplus\mathrm{SO}(l)$ as a subgroup of $\mathrm{SO}(2,l)$ by the embedding $$(A,B)
\mapsto
\left(\begin{matrix}
A & 0\\
0 & B
\end{matrix}\right).$$
For $Z\in L\otimes\mathbb{C}$ we let $\bar Z$ denote the complex conjugate with complex conjugation acting on $\mathbb{C}$. Define $$\tilde{\mathcal{K}}
=
\{
Z\in L\otimes \mathbb{C} :
(Z,Z)=0 \hbox{ and } (Z,\bar Z)>0
\},
\quad
\mathcal{K}
=
\mathbb{P}(\mathcal{K}),$$ where $\mathbb{P}(\mathcal{K})$ denotes the image of $\mathcal{K}$ in projective space.
It is clear the the standard actions of $\mathrm{SO}(2,l)$ on $\mathbb{C}^{2+l}$ and $\mathbb{P}^{1+l}(\mathbb{C})$ preserve the subsets $\tilde{\mathcal{K}}$ and $\mathcal{K}$. Furthermore one can show that the action of $\mathrm{SO}(2,l)$ on $\mathcal{K}$ is transitive. Also, if $z\in L\otimes\mathbb{R}$ is a non-zero isotropic vector then one can check that for all $Z\in\tilde{\mathcal{K}}$, $$(Z,z)\ne 0.$$ Consider the vector $$Z_{0}
=
b_{1}+ib_{2}
=
\left(\begin{matrix} 1\\i\\0 \\\vdots\\0\end{matrix}\right)\in \tilde{\mathcal{K}}.$$ One easily checks that the stabilizer of $[Z_{0}]$ in $\mathrm{SO}(2,l)$ is $\mathrm{SO}(2)\oplus\mathrm{SO}(l)$. Therefore $\mathcal{K}$ is homeomorphic to $\mathrm{SO}(2,l)/(\mathrm{SO}(2)\oplus\mathrm{SO}(l))$. Furthermore if we define $\mathcal{K}^{+}$ to be the connected component of $[Z_{0}]$ in $\mathcal{K}$ then we see that $\mathcal{K}^{+}$ is homeomorphic to $\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)/(\mathrm{SO}(2)\oplus\mathrm{SO}(l))$. As $\mathrm{SO}(2)\oplus\mathrm{SO}(l)$ is a maximal compact subgroup of $\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$, it follows that $\mathcal{K}^{+}$ is a symmetric space, and hence contractible.
We now fix an isotropic vector $z\in L$.
For $\sigma\in\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$ and $Z\in \tilde{\mathcal{K}}^{+}$ we define $$j(\sigma,Z)
=
\frac{(\sigma(Z),z)}{(Z,z)}.$$ This is non-zero, and clearly depends only on the image of $Z$ in $\mathcal{K}$.
It follows immediately that $j$ is a factor of automorphy, i.e. it satisfies the relation: $$j(\sigma_{1}\sigma_{2},Z)
=
j(\sigma_{1},\sigma_{2}Z)
j(\sigma_{2},Z).$$ Let $r=p/q\in\mathbb{Q}$. Since the set $\mathcal{K}^{+}$ is contractible, we may choose, for each $\sigma\in\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$, a branch $j(\sigma,Z)^{r}$ of the $r$-th power of $j(\sigma,Z)$, which is continuous in $Z$. We shall choose these branches in such a way that $j(\sigma,Z)^{r}$ is a Borel measurable function of $(\sigma,Z)$ (we could, for example, choose it to be continuous on each double coset in the Bruhat decomposition of $\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$).
\[wrdefn\] For $\sigma_{1},\sigma_{2}\in \mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$ we define $$w_{r}(\sigma_{1},\sigma_{2})
=
\frac{j(\sigma_{1}\sigma_{2},Z)^{r}}
{j(\sigma_{1},\sigma_{2}Z)^{r}j(\sigma_{2},Z)^{r}}.$$ This is a $q$-th root of unity and depends only on $\sigma_{1}$, $\sigma_{2}$, and not on $Z$.
The function $w_{r}$ is a Borel measurable function on $\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)\times \mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$ and satisfies the 2-cocycle relation: $$w_{r}(\sigma_{1},\sigma_{2})
w_{r}(\sigma_{1}\sigma_{2},\sigma_{3})
=
w_{r}(\sigma_{1},\sigma_{2}\sigma_{3})
w_{r}(\sigma_{2},\sigma_{3}).$$ Up to a measurable coboundary, $w_{r}$ is independent of the choice of the branches $j(\sigma,Z)^{r}$. It therefore determines a central extension of $\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$ by $\mu_{q}$. We shall now describe this covering group in another way.
Now regard $\mathrm{SO}(2)\oplus\mathrm{SO}(l)$ as a subgroup of $\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$ in the obvious way. We shall calculate the restriction of $w_{r}$ to these two subgroups. Note that since $\mathrm{SO}(2)$ is isomorphic to $\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}$ it has a unique connected $q$-fold central extension: $$\begin{array}{ccccccccc}
1& \to& \mu_{q}& \to& \mathrm{SO}(2)& \to& \mathrm{SO}(2)& \to& 1\medskip\\
&&&&\sigma&\mapsto & \sigma^{q}
\end{array}$$
\[covercalc\] Let $r=p/q$ with $p$ and $q$ coprime.
- The restriction of $w_{r}$ to $\mathrm{SO}(2)$ corresponds to a connected $n$-fold covering group of $\mathrm{SO}(2)$.
- The restriction of $w_{r}$ to $\mathrm{SO}(l)$ is a coboundary.
*Proof.* Recall that the vector $Z_{0}\in \tilde{\mathcal{K}}^{+}$ is an eigenvector of every element of $\mathrm{SO}(2)\oplus\mathrm{SO}(l)$. For $\sigma\in\mathrm{SO}(l)$ we have $\sigma Z_{0}=Z_{0}$. Hence for $\sigma\in\mathrm{SO}(l)$ we have $j(\sigma,Z_{0})=1$, so we may choose $j(\sigma,Z_{0})^{r}=1$. With this choice, $w_{r}(\sigma_{1},\sigma_{2})=1$ for all $\sigma_{1},\sigma_{2}\in \mathrm{SO}(l)$.
On the other hand for $$\sigma_{\theta}
=
\left(\begin{matrix}
\cos\theta&\sin\theta\\
-\sin\theta&\cos\theta
\end{matrix}\right)
\in\mathrm{SO}(2),$$ we have $$\sigma_{\theta} Z_{0}
=
\left(\begin{matrix}
\exp(i\theta)\\
i\exp(i\theta)\\
0\\\vdots\\0
\end{matrix}\right)
=
\exp(i\theta) Z_{0}.$$ Hence $j(\sigma_{\theta},Z_{0})=\exp(i\theta)$. The result follows easily from this. $\square$
Let $r\in \mathbb{Q}$ and let $\Gamma$ be an arithmetic subgroup of $\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$. By a weight $r$ multiplier system on $\Gamma$ we shall mean a function $$\chi:\Gamma\to \mathbb{C}^{\times},$$ such that for all $\gamma_{1},\gamma_{2}\in\Gamma$, $$\chi(\gamma_{1}\gamma_{2})
=
w_{r}(\gamma_{1},\gamma_{2})
\chi(\gamma_{1})\chi(\gamma_{2}).$$
The homogeneous space $\mathcal{K}^{+}$ also has a complex structure (see [@bruinier]) which gives sense to the following definition and theorem.
Let $\Gamma$ be an arithmetic subgroup of $\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$. By a weight $r$ meromorphic modular form with respect to $\Gamma$ we shall mean a meromorphic function $\Psi:\mathcal{K}^{+}\to\mathbb{C}\cup\{\infty\}$, for which there is a weight $r$ multiplier system $\chi$ on $\Gamma$, satisfying for all $\gamma\in\Gamma$, $Z\in\mathcal{K}^{+}$, $$\Psi(\gamma Z)
=
\chi(\gamma)j(\gamma,Z)^{r}\Psi(Z).$$
Let $f\in \mathcal{M}_{1-l/2,L}^{!}$ be a weakly holomorphic form, whose Fourier coefficients $c(f,\delta,n)$ are integral for all $n<0$. Then there is a corresponding non-zero meromorphic form $\Psi_{f}$ on $\Gamma_{L}$ of weight $c(f,0,0)/2$. Here $\Gamma_{L}$ denotes the subgroup of elements in $\sigma\in\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$ such that $\sigma L=L$.
(This is the only part of Theorem 3.22 of [@bruinier] which we require).
Covering groups of $\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$
=========================================
In this section, we shall show that pulling a modular form from $\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$ back to $\mathrm{Spin}(2,l)$ does not change its weight.
The fundamental group of $\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$ is isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}\oplus(\mathbb{Z}/2)$. More precisely the obvious map $$\mathrm{SO}(2)\oplus \mathrm{SO}(l)\to \mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$$ induces an isomorphism $$\pi_{1}(\mathrm{SO}(2))\oplus \pi_{1}(\mathrm{SO}(l)) \to \pi_{1}(\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l))$$
*Proof.* It follows from the Iwasawa decomposition of $\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$ is homotopic to its maximal compact subgroup $\mathrm{SO}(2)\oplus \mathrm{SO}(l)$. $\square$
The proposition implies that the universal cover $\widetilde{\mathrm{SO}}^{+}(2,l)^{univ}$ fits into an exact sequence: $$1 \to \mathbb{Z}\oplus (\mathbb{Z}/2) \to \widetilde{\mathrm{SO}}^{+}(2,l)^{univ} \to \mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)\to 1.$$ Recall that any other connected covering group is of the form $\widetilde{\mathrm{SO}}^{+}(2,l)^{univ}/H$, for a unique subgroup $H\subset \mathbb{Z}\oplus(\mathbb{Z}/2)$. The fundamental group of the covering group $\widetilde{\mathrm{SO}}^{+}(2,l)^{univ}/H$ may be identified in an obvious way with $H$.
The double cover $\mathrm{Spin}(2,l)$ of $\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$ corresponds to the subgroup of $\mathbb{Z}\oplus(\mathbb{Z}/2)$ generated by the element $(1,1)$.
*Proof.* The subgroup corresponding to $\mathrm{Spin}(2,l)$ has index 2 in $\mathbb{Z}\oplus(\mathbb{Z}/2)$. There are three such subgroups, which are generated as follows: $$\langle (2,0),(0,1)\rangle,\quad
\langle (1,0)\rangle,\quad
\langle (1,1)\rangle.$$ However the restrictions of $\mathrm{Spin}(2,l)$ to $\mathrm{SO}(2)$ and $\mathrm{SO}(l)$ are the non-trivial covers $\mathrm{Spin}(2)$ and $\mathrm{Spin}(l)$ respectively. From this we deduce that neither $\pi_{1}(SO(2))$ nor $\pi_{1}(\mathrm{SO}(l))$ is contained in the subgroup. Hence the only possibility is $\langle (1,1)\rangle$. $\square$
We shall identify $\pi_{1}(\mathrm{Spin}(2,l))$ with the subgroup $\langle (1,1)\rangle$, which is isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}$.
For $q\in\mathbb{N}$ we let $\widetilde{\mathrm{SO}}^{+}(2,l)_{(q)}$ denote the $q$-fold cyclic cover of $\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$ corresponding to the subgroup $$\langle (q,0),(0,1)\rangle.$$ Our interest in this covering group is because Borcherds lifts are forms on this group. We also let $\widetilde{\mathrm{Spin}}(2,l)_{(q)}$ denote the pullback of $\widetilde{\mathrm{SO}}^{+}(2,l)_{(q)}$ to $\mathrm{Spin}(2,l)$: $$\begin{array}{ccc}
\widetilde{\mathrm{Spin}}(2,l)_{(q)} & \to & \mathrm{Spin}(2,l)\medskip\\
\downarrow&& \downarrow \medskip\\
\widetilde{\mathrm{SO}}^{+}(2,l)_{(q)} & \to & \mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l).
\end{array}$$
$\widetilde{\mathrm{Spin}}(2,l)_{(q)}$ is the unique connected $q$-fold cyclic cover of $\mathrm{Spin}(2,l)$.
*Proof.* The cover $\widetilde{\mathrm{Spin}}(2,l)_{(q)}$ of $\mathrm{Spin}(2,l)$ corresponds to the intersection $\pi_{1}(\mathrm{Spin}(2,l))\cap \pi_{1}(\widetilde{\mathrm{SO}}^{+}(2,l)_{(q)})$. This intersection is $\langle (q,q) \rangle$, which is the subgroup of $\pi_{1}(\mathrm{Spin}(2,l))$ of index $q$. $\square$
Let $r=p/q\in\mathbb{Q}$ with $p$ and $q$ coprime. The covering group of $\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$ corresponding to the cocycle $w_{r}$ (see Definition \[wrdefn\]) is isomorphic to the connected $q$-fold cover $\widetilde{\mathrm{SO}}^{+}(2,l)_{(q)}$.
*Proof.* Let $\tilde G$ denote the covering group corresponding to $w_{r}$. There is a canonical homomorphism $\widetilde{\mathrm{SO}}^{+}(2,l)^{univ}\to \tilde G$, and by restriction a map $\varphi:\pi_{1}(\widetilde{\mathrm{SO}}(2,l)^{univ})\to \mu_{q}$. $$\begin{array}{ccccccccc}
1&\to&
\mathbb{Z}\oplus(\mathbb{Z}/2)& \to&
\widetilde{\mathrm{SO}}^{+}(2,l)^{univ} & \to&
\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)&\to& 1 \medskip \\
&& \varphi\downarrow\;\;\; && \downarrow &&|| \medskip \\
1&\to&
\mu_{q}& \to&
\tilde G & \to&
\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)&\to& 1. \\
\end{array}$$ We must show that the kernel of $\varphi$ is precisely the subgroup $\langle (q,0),(0,1)\rangle$. To calculate $\varphi$, it is enough calculate its restrictions to $\pi_{1}(\mathrm{SO}(2))=\mathbb{Z}$ and $\pi_{1}(\mathrm{SO}(l))=\mathbb{Z}/2$.
By Lemma \[covercalc\] we know that $\varphi$ is trivial on $\pi_{1}(\mathrm{SO}(l))$. Furthermore by Lemma \[covercalc\], the preimage of $\mathrm{SO}(2)$ in $\tilde G$ is connected. This implies that the induced map $\varphi:\pi_{1}(\mathrm{SO}(2))\to \mu_{q}$ is surjective. The result follows. $\square$
Fractional weight multiplier systems
====================================
Let $G$ be a (real) connected Lie group with a connected cyclic cover $$1 \to \mu_{n} \to \tilde G \to G \to 1.$$ Here $\mu_{n}$ denotes the group of $n$-th roots of unity in $\mathbb{C}$. Suppose we have an arithmetic subgroup $\Gamma\subset G$. We shall discuss the following question:
- does $\Gamma$ lift to a subgroup of $\tilde G$?
Let $\mathbb{C}^{1}$ denote the group of complex numbers with absolute value 1. Suppose $w:G\times G \to \mu_{n}$ is a 2-cocycle representing the group extension $\tilde G$. By a weight $w$ multiplier system on $\Gamma$, we shall mean a function $\chi: \Gamma \to \mathbb{C}^{1}$ such that $$\chi(\gamma_{1}\gamma_{2})
=
w(\gamma_{1},\gamma_{2}) \chi(\gamma_{1}) \chi(\gamma_{2}).$$ In other words the image of $w$ in $Z^{2}(\Gamma, \mathbb{C}^{1})$ is the coboundary $\partial\chi$. If an arithmetic subgroup $\Gamma$ lifts to $\tilde G$ then such a $\chi$ exists on $\Gamma$. There is a partial converse to this:
\[easy\] If there is a weight $w$ multiplier system on an arithmetic subgroup $\Gamma\subset G$ then there is an arithmetic subgroup $\Gamma_{0}\subset \Gamma$ which lifts to $\tilde G$.
\[weights\] Let $G/\mathbb{R}$ be absolutely simple and simply connected and let $\tilde G\to G$ be a connected $n$-fold cyclic cover. Let $\Gamma$ be a congruence subgroup of $G$ such that every subgroup of finite index in $\Gamma$ is a congruence subgroup. Furthermore, in the case that $G$ is a special unitary group, assume that the construction of $\Gamma$ does not involve is a non-abelian division algebra. If $\Gamma$ lifts to $\tilde G$ then $n\le 2$.
Both these results are proved in [@hillkyoto]. We shall apply the theorem in the case $G=\mathrm{Spin}(2,l)$. To do this we need the congruence subgroup property for spinor groups:
\[kneser\] Let $L$ be a lattice over $\mathbb{Z}$ of signature $(2,l)$ with $l\ge 3$, and let $\Gamma$ be the preimage in $\mathrm{Spin}(2,l)$ of the group of special orthogonal transformations of $L$. Then every subgroup of finite index in $\Gamma$ is a congruence subgroup.
Proofs of the main results
==========================
\[orthogonalweights\] Let $f$ be a non-zero weight $r\in\mathbb{Q}$ modular form on $\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$ with respect to some arithmetic subgroup of $\Gamma_{L}$. Then $r\in \frac{1}{2}\mathbb{Z}$.
*Proof.* Let $r=p/q$ with $p$ and $q$ coprime. Hence there is a weight $p/q$ multiplier system on $\Gamma_{L}$. It follows by Proposition \[easy\], that some arithmetic subgroup $\Gamma_{1}\subset\Gamma_{L}$ lifts to the covering group $\widetilde{\mathrm{SO}}^{+}(2,l)_{(q)}$. On the other hand, since $\mathrm{Spin}(2,l)$ is algebraic, it follows that some arithmetic subgroup $\Gamma_{2}\subset \Gamma_{L}$ lifts to $\mathrm{Spin}(2,l)$. Hence the intersection $\Gamma=\Gamma_{1}\cap\Gamma_{2}$ lifts to $\widetilde{\mathrm{Spin}}(2,l)_{(q)}$.
Note now that the preimage of $\Gamma$ in $\mathrm{Spin}(2,l)$ is an arithmetic subgroup of $\mathrm{Spin}(2,l)$ which lifts to the connected $q$-fold cover $\widetilde{\mathrm{Spin}}(2,l)_{(q)}$. Theorems \[weights\] and \[kneser\] now imply that $q\le 2$. $\square$
We could not use Theorem \[weights\] directly on $\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$, since this group is not algebraically simply connected, and its arithmetic subgroups are not all congruence subgroups.
\[integrality\] Let $f\in \mathcal{M}_{1-l/2,L}^{!}$ be a weakly holomorphic form. If the Fourier coefficients $c(f,\alpha,n)$ are integral for all $n<0$. Then $c(f,0,0)\in\mathbb{Z}$.
*Proof.* By Borcherds theorem together there is a non-zero form $\Psi_{f}$ of weight $c(f,0,0)/2$ on the orthogonal group $\mathrm{SO}^{+}(2,l)$. The result follows from the previous theorem. $\square$
In the case that $L$ is unimodular, we have $\mathbb{C}[L'/L]=\mathbb{C}$ and $\varrho$ is the trivial representation of $\mathrm{Mp}_{2}(\mathbb{Z})$. In this case, $l$ is always even (in fact $2+l$ is a multiple of $4$), and our results refer to $\mathbb{C}$-valued, integral weight, level 1 forms. We note the following generalization of Corollary \[integrality\] in this context.
Let $f$ be a weakly holomorphic, $\mathbb{C}$-valued modular form of level $1$ and weight $k\in 2\mathbb{Z}$ with $k\le 0$. Let $f$ have the following Fourier expansion: $$f(\tau)
=
\sum_{n=-N}^{\infty} c(f,n)q^{n}.$$ If $c(f,n)\in\mathbb{Z}$ for all $n<0$ then $c(f,n)\in\mathbb{Z}$ for all $n$.
This is fairly easy to prove and seems to be well-known, although I don’t know where the proof has been written down. To prove it one can use Corollary \[integrality\] and proceed by induction on $n$, multiplying $f$ by $\Delta^{-1}$ at each step.
Fix $N\in\mathbb{N}$, and let $a(\alpha,n)$ be integers for $\alpha\in L'/L$ and $n=1,\ldots ,N$. If for every cusp form $f\in \mathcal{S}_{1+l/2,L}$ we have $$\sum a(\alpha,n)c(f, \alpha,n)=0$$ then we must also have $$\sum a(\alpha,n)c(E, \alpha,n) \in \mathbb{Z},$$ where $c(E, \alpha,n)$ are the coefficients of the Eisenstein series.
*Proof.* Since $\sum a(\alpha,n)c(f, \alpha,n)=0$ for all cusp forms $f$, it follows from Theorem \[principalpart\] that there is a weakly holomorphic form $g\in \mathcal{M}^{!}_{1-l/2,L}$ with principal part $$c(g, \alpha,-n)=a(\alpha,n).$$ By (\[constantterm\]) the constant coefficient of $g$ is given by the formula $$c(g,0,0)=\sum a(\alpha,n)c(E, \alpha,n).$$ By the previous corollary this is an integer. $\square$
Let $N\in\mathbb{N}$. There is a cusp form $f\in \mathcal{S}_{1+l/2,L}$ with rational coefficients such that for $0\le n\le N$ and $\alpha\in L'/L$, $$c(f, \alpha,n) \equiv c(E, \alpha,n) \bmod \mathbb{Z}.$$
*Proof.* We can choose $N$ large enough so that a modular form $f\in \mathcal{M}_{1+l/2,L}$ is determined by the coefficients $c(f,\alpha,n)$ for $0\le n\le N$. We shall write $\mathcal{M}_{1+l/2,L}(\mathbb{Q})$ and $\mathcal{S}_{1+l/2,L}(\mathbb{Q})$ for the spaces of forms and cusp forms with rational coefficients.
Let $V$ be the group of functions $a:L'/L\times \{1,\ldots, N\}\to\mathbb{Z}$. There is a (degenerate) pairing $V\times \mathcal{M}_{1+l/2,L}(\mathbb{Q})\to\mathbb{Q}$ given by $$\langle a,f \rangle
=
\sum_{n=1}^{N} a(\alpha,n)c(f, \alpha,n).$$ Let $V_{0}$ be the orthogonal complement of $\mathcal{M}_{1+l/2,L}(\mathbb{Q})$, so we have a non-degenerate pairing $(V/V_{0})\times \mathcal{M}_{1+l/2,L}(\mathbb{Q})\to\mathbb{Q}$. Let $W\subseteq V$ be the orthogonal complement of the space of cusp forms. It follows from Theorem \[rationality\] and our choice of $N$ that $\mathcal{S}_{1+l/2,L}(\mathbb{Q})$ is the orthogonal complement of $W$.
The previous lemma shows that $$\langle W, E \rangle
\subseteq
\mathbb{Z}.$$ Since $W$ is a direct summand of $V$, it follows that there is a linear map $\lambda:V\to \mathbb{Z}$ such that $$\lambda(w)=\langle w,E \rangle,
\qquad
w\in W.$$ Since $\lambda$ is zero on $V_{0}$, there is a form $f\in \mathcal{M}_{1+l/2,L}(\mathbb{Q})$, such that $$\langle v, f \rangle
=
\lambda(v),
\qquad
v\in V.$$ Hence $E-f$ is in the orthogonal complement of $W$, so is a cusp form. On the other hand, $\langle V,f \rangle=\lambda(V)\subset\mathbb{Z}$, so the coefficients $c(f,\alpha,n)$ are integers for $n\le N$. $\square$
There is a cusp form $f\in \mathcal{S}_{1+l/2,L}$ such that For all $n\in\mathbb{N}$ and $\alpha\in L'/L$, $$c(f, \alpha,n) \equiv c(E, \alpha,n) \bmod \mathbb{Z}.$$
*Proof.* For the moment fix $N$. We know that there is a cusp form $f$ such that for $n \le N$ and $\alpha\in L'/L$ we have $c(E, \alpha,n)-c(f, \alpha,n)\in \mathbb{Z}$. Let $A_N$ be the set of all such $f$. We clearly have $A_{1}\supseteq A_{2}\supseteq \ldots$. Our aim is to show that the intersection of the sets $A_{N}$ is non-empty.
Clearly $A_N$ is a coset of a subgroup $B_N$ of $\mathcal{S}_{k,L}$. In fact $B_N$ is the set of cusp forms whose first $N$ coefficients are integers. As long as $N$ is large enough, a cusp form is determined by its first $N$ coefficients. Hence $B_N$ is a $\mathbb{Z}$-module of finite rank. As we have $B_{N+1} \subseteq B_N$, it follows that for large $r$ the rank of $B_r$ is stable. Furthermore as the coefficients of cusp forms have bounded denominators (Theorem \[rationality\] or [@serrestark]), it follows that for $N$ large enough we have $B_N=B_{N+1}= \ldots$. Hence $A_N=A_{N+1}= \ldots$. It follows that the intersection of all the sets $A_{N}$ is non-empty, which proves the theorem. $\square$
Theorem \[main\] is equivalent to the above theorem.
[10]{}
Antoniadis, J. A.; Kohnen, W. “Congruences between cusp forms and Eisenstein series of half-integral weight.” Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 57 (1987), 157–164.
Borcherds, R. E. “Automorphic forms with singularities on Grassmanians” Invent. Math. 132, 491-562 (1998).
Borcherds, R. E. “The Gross-Kohnen-Zagier theorem in higher dimensions”, Duke Math. J. 97 (1999), 219-233.
Brown, Jim. “Saito-Kurokawa lifts and applications to the Bloch-Kato conjecture” to appear, Compositio Math.
Bruinier, J. H. *Borcherds Products on $O(2,l)$ and Chern Classes of Heegner Divisors* Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1780 (2002).
Bruinier, J. H.; Funke, J. “On two geometric theta lifts” Duke Math. Journal 125 (2004), 45-90.
Bruinier, J. H.; Kuss, M. “Eisenstein series attached to lattices and modular forms on orthogonal groups” Manuscripta Math. 106 (2001), no. 4, 443–459.
Deligne, P. “Extensions centrales non résiduellement finies de groupes arithmetiques”, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 287 (1978) 203-208.
Hahn, A. J.; O’Meara, O. T. *The classical groups and $K$-theory.* Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften 291. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989.
Hill, R. “Fractional weights and non-congruence subgroups.” Automorphic Forms and Representations of algebraic groups over local fields, Saito,H., Takahashi,T. (ed.) *Surikenkoukyuroku series.* , 1338, (2003) 71-80.
Kneser, M. “Normalteiler ganzzahliger Spingruppen.” (German) J. Reine Angew. Math. 311/312 (1979), 191–214.
Koblitz, N. “$p$-adic congruences and modular forms of half integer weight.” Math. Ann. 274 (1986), no. 2, 199Ð220.
McGraw, W. J. “The rationality of vector valued modular forms associated with the Weil representation.” Math. Ann. 326 (2003), no. 1, 105–122.
Serre, J.-P.; Stark, H. M. “Modular forms of weight $1/2$.” Modular functions of one variable, VI (Proc. Second Internat. Conf., Univ. Bonn, Bonn, 1976), pp. 27–67. Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 627, Springer, Berlin, 1977.
Shintani, T. “On construction of holomorphic cusp forms of half integral weight.” Nagoya Math. J. 58 (1975), 83–126.
Weil, A. “Sur certains groupes d’opérateurs unitaires.” Acta Math. 111 1964 143–211.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
author:
- Jelena Petrovic
- Norbert Langer
- 'Sung-Chul Yoon'
- Alexander Heger
bibliography:
- '2545gam.bib'
date: 'Received; accepted'
title: 'Which Massive stars are Gamma-Ray Burst Progenitors?'
---
Introduction {#intro}
============
From studies of host galaxies of gamma-ray bursts it was concluded that they occur in or close to star forming regions. Several of them are associated with a very energetic variety of Type Ic supernova with broad lines [“hypernova”, @2002ApJ...572L..51P; @2003Natur.423..847H], thought to display the explosion of a massive Wolf-Rayet star. And finally, their afterglows show signatures of the shaping of the circumstellar medium by a massive progenitor star [@marlepaper]. The most widely used model for GRB production in the context of black hole formation in a massive single star is the so called collapsar model [@1993AAS...182.5505W].
A collapsar is a massive [$M\,$$\gtrsim$$\,35$-$40\,\mathrm
{M}_{\odot}$, @1999ApJ...522..413F] rotating star whose core collapses to form a black hole [@1993ApJ...405..273W; @1999ApJ...524..262M]. If the collapsing core has enough angular momentum [$j$$\ge$3$\cdot$10$^{16}\rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$, @1999ApJ...524..262M] an accretion disk is formed around the black hole. The accretion of the rest of the core at accretion rates up to 0.1$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}s^{-1}$ by the newly-formed black hole is thought to be capable of producing a collimated highly relativistic outflow. This releases large amounts of energy ($\sim$10$^{51}\rm~
erg~s^{-1}$) some of which is deposited in the low density rotation axis of the star. In case the star has no hydrogen envelope, i.e., has a light crossing time which is less or comparable to the duration of the central accretion (about 10s), a GRB accompanied by a Type Ib/c supernova may be produced. The collapsar models for gamma-ray bursts thus need three essential ingredients: a massive core, loss of the hydrogen envelope, and sufficient angular momentum to form an accretion disk.
@2000NewAR..44..297H have calculated models of a 25$\,\mathrm
M_{\odot}$ star that could form a black hole by fallback (SN explosion occurs while the core forms a neutron star, but so much matter fails to escape and falls back onto the neutron star that it turns into a black hole). This star ends its life as a red supergiant with an iron core of 1.9$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$, a helium core of 8.06$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$, and a low density envelope of 6.57$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$. They found that this star has sufficient angular momentum to form an accretion disk around the black hole which may lead to an asymmetric, jet-driven supernovae, or in the case that the star lost its hydrogen envelope, even a GRB can result. The rotating pre-supernova models of @2000ApJ...528..368H predicted, for the mass range 10...20$\,\mathrm
M_{\odot}$, an iron core angular momentum barely sufficient for the GRB production model through collapsar, with a trend of decreasing final specific angular momentum for larger initial mass. @2000ApJ...528..368H showed also that specific angular momentum of the stellar core depends significantly on the inhibiting effect of the mean molecular weight gradient on rotational mixing processes.
Only if composition is a efficient barrier for rotational mixing and transport of angular momentum, it prevents the core from losing most of its angular momentum during the evolution. Finally, the rotating pre-supernova models of predict about twice as much final core angular momentum as the models of @2000ApJ...528..368H.
These calculations left out the influence of a magnetic field which can significantly alter the angular momentum transport processes in the star, for example slowing down the helium core of the star during the red supergiant phase [@1998Natur.393..139S]. Single star pre-supernova models including angular momentum transport by magnetic torques, using the improved dynamo model of , have been produced by @2004IAUS..215b and @2004astro.ph..9422H, with a clear result: although these models predict neutron star spins in the range displayed by young pulsars, the amount of angular momentum in their cores is one to two orders of magnitude less than what is required by the collapsar model of GRB production. A possible conclusion therefore might be that, if the dynamo model of is qualitatively right, massive single stars can not form GRBs within the collapsar model.
Only one in one hundred collapsing massive stars needs to produce, however, a GRB in order to explain their frequency. It seems therefore legitimate to explore collapsars in the frame of massive close binary evolution. @wellsteinphd and @2004AAinprep showed that during the mass transfer phase in a binary system, the secondary (accreting) star can spin up to close to critical rotation, i.e., surface layers of this star can gain large amounts of angular momentum. This angular momentum can be transported inward and increase the rotation rate of the stellar core. In this case, one may expect that the effects of magnetic fields would be helpful in spinning up the core, and that faster rotating cores might be produced than in the non-magnetic models.
In this paper, we investigate four different types of rotating massive star models: single and binary models, both with and without magnetic fields included. In Sect. \[comp\] we briefly explain our numerical methods and physical assumptions, and in Sect. \[nonmagnetic\] we explore non-magnetic single and binary stars. In Sect. \[magnetic\] we present our magnetic models, first single stars then binary evolution models, and in Sect. \[concl\] we summarize our conclusions.
Computational method {#comp}
====================
We compute detailed evolutionary rotating models of non-magnetic 20$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ and 42$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ single stars, and of a 42$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ single star with magnetic field included. Then we calculate the evolution of a non-magnetic and a magnetic binary system with rotating components of $M_{\rm 1,in}$=56$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ and $M_{\rm 2,in}$=33$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ and an orbital period $p_{\rm in}$=6 days. We also compute models of a rotating 33$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ star that accretes matter at the end of its main sequence evolution, for the non-magnetic and magnetic cases.
We use the evolutionary code developed by @1998PhDT........29B on the basis of an implicit hydrodynamic stellar evolution code for single stars .
The treatment of convection and semiconvection have been described in and . Changes in chemical composition are computed using a nuclear network including pp chains, the CNO-cycle, and the major helium, carbon, neon and oxygen burning reactions. More details are given in and . For all models, a metallicity $Z$=0.02 is adopted and we use the OPAL opacities [@1996ApJ...464..943I]. The abundance ratios of the isotopes are chosen to have the solar meteoritic abundance ratios according to @1993ist..proc..410N. The change of the orbital period due to mass transfer and stellar wind mass loss is computed according to @1992ApJ...391..246P, with a specific angular momentum of the stellar wind material calculated according to @1993ApJ...410..719B. The influence of the centrifugal force in the rotating models is implemented according to @1970stro.coll...20K.
Stellar wind mass loss for O stars is calculated according to . For hydrogen poor stars ($X_{\rm
s}<0.4$) we used a relation based on the empirical mass loss rates of Wolf-Rayet stars derived by : $$\label{maslos}
{log({\dot M_{\rm WR}}/{\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}yr^{\rm -1}})}=-11.95+1.5logL/L_{\odot}-2.85X_{\rm s}.$$ Since suggested that these mass loss rates may be overestimated, we calculated evolutionary models in which the mass loss rate given by Eq. \[maslos\] is multiplied by $1/3$.
Also, enhanced mass loss due to rotation is included: $${\dot M}/{\dot M (v_{\rm rot}=0)}={1}/{(1-{\Omega})^{\rm \xi}},$$ where $\xi$=0.43, $\Omega$=$v_{\rm rot}/v_{\rm crit}$ and $v_{\rm
crit}^{\rm 2}$=${GM(1-\Gamma)}/R$ with $\Gamma$=$L/L_{\rm
Edd}$=${\kappa}L/(4{\pi}cGM)$ is the Eddington factor, $G$ is gravitational constant, $M$ is mass, $R$ radius, $\kappa$ opacity, $v_{\rm rot}$ rotating velocity and $v_{\rm crit}$ critical rotational velocity .
The transport of angular momentum in our code is formulated as a diffusive process: $$\begin{aligned}
\left (\frac{\partial \omega}{\partial t} \right )_m={\frac{1}{i}}
\left (\frac{\partial}{\partial m} \right )_t \left [ \left (4\pi r^2
\rho \right )^2i \nu \left (\frac{\partial \omega}{\partial m} \right
)_t \right ] \nonumber\\ -{\frac{2w}{r}} \left (\frac{\partial
r}{\partial t} \right )_m{\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{dlni}{dlnr}},\end{aligned}$$ where $\nu$ is the turbulent viscosity and $i$ is the specific angular momentum of a shell at mass coordinate $m$. Factor $(1/2)(dlni/dlnr)$ vanishes if the gyration constant $k=i/r^2$ does not depend on $r$, i.e. if all shells are moving homologously.
A parameter $f_{\mu}$=0.05 is adopted for sensitivity of the rotationally induced mixing processes to the $\mu$-gradient [@2000ApJ...528..368H]. As shown by , $\mu$-gradients can efficiently suppress rotationally induced transport processes. The strenght of this inhibiting effect is descibed by the parameter $f_{\mu}$=$0..1$ [@1989ApJ...338..424P]. A value of $f_{\mu}$=$0.05$ reproduces the best observations of the enrichement in the surface of the main sequence stars with products of CNO process.
At the surface of the star, the angular momentum contained in the layers which are lost due to stellar wind gets removed from the star: $$\dot J=\dot M j_{\mathrm{spec}}$$ where $j_{\mathrm{spec}}$ is the average angular momentum at the surface of the star and $\dot M$ the stellar wind mass loss rate. The turbulent viscosity, $\nu$, is determined as the sum of the convective and semiconvective diffusion coefficients and those from rotationally induced instabilities (dynamical shear, Solberg-H[ø]{}iland, secular shear, Goldreich-Schubert-Fricke instability and Eddington-Sweet circulation). Rotationally induced mixing processes and angular momentum transport through the stellar interior are described in detail by @2000ApJ...528..368H.
The code calculates the simultaneous evolution of two stellar components of a binary system and computes mass transfer within the Roche approximation [@1978dcbs.conf.....K]. Mass loss from the Roche lobe filling component through the first Lagrangian point is given by as: $${\dot M}={\dot M_{\rm 0}}\exp(R-R_{\rm l})/{H_{\rm p}}$$ with ${\dot M_{\rm 0}}$=${{\rho}v_{\rm s}Q}/{\sqrt e}$, where $e$ is the base of the natural logarithm, $H_{\rm p}$ is the photospheric pressure scale height, $\rho$ is the density, $v_{\rm s}$ the velocity of sound, and $Q$ the effective cross-section of the stream through the first Lagrangian point according to . The time scales for synchronization and circularization of the binary orbit as well as spin-orbit coupling are given by . The specific angular momentum of the accreted matter is determined by integrating the equation of motion of a test particle in the Roche potential [@wellsteinphd accretion stream impacts directly on the secondary star].
We calculate the evolution of binary systems in detail until Case AB mass transfer starts. Then we remove the hydrogen rich envelope from the primary, until only 5% of the hydrogen is left in the envelope. This is the point where we assume that the primary shrinks and Case AB stops. On the other side, we calculate the secondary star assuming accretion with a mass transfer of 10$^{-4} \,\mathrm
{M}_{\odot} \rm yr^{-1}$. We calculate the Kelvin-Helmholtz time scale of the primary on the beginning of Case AB mass transfer: $${t_{\rm KH}=2\cdot10^{\rm 7}{M_{\rm 1}}^{\rm 2}/(L_{\rm 1}R_{\rm l1})\rm yr},$$ where $M_{\rm 1}$, $L_{\rm 1}$ and $R_{\rm l1}$ are mass, luminosity and Roche radius (in Solar units) of the primary star at the onset of Case AB mass transfer. Mass transfer rate is: $$\label{mtr}
{\dot M_{\rm tr}=(M_{\rm 1}-M_{\rm He})/{t_{\rm KH}}}$$ where $M_{\rm He}$ is the mass of the helium core with $\sim$5% of hydrogen on the surface, i.e. the initial WR mass. We calculate the orbit change assuming constant mass transfer rate calculated by Eq. \[mtr\] and an average accretion efficiency ($\beta$) which is the same as for the fast phase of Case A, since Case AB also happens on the thermal time scale. Matter that has not been accreted on the secondary leaves the system with a specific angular momentum which corresponds to the secondary orbital angular momentum [@2001MNRAS.321..327K]. Stellar wind mass loss is neglected.
We follow the evolution of the binary system, again in detail, until the primary finishes carbon core burning. We assume that after this the system is disrupted by the SN explosion of the primary and we model the secondary further as a single star. Stellar wind mass loss for red supergiants is given by .
Magnetic fields generated by differential rotation are included according to . The rate at which the field is amplified is determined by the differential rotation. Differentional rotation rate (rotation gradient) is a function of a radial coordinate only (’shellular rotation’) and is given by: $$q=\frac{\partial\ln\Omega_\star}{\partial\ln r}=\frac{r\partial_r \Omega_\star}{\Omega_\star}$$ The dynamo process requires a minimum rotation gradient $q_{min}$ to operate.
The effective radial viscosity produced by the magnetic field is: $$\nu_{re}=\frac{\nu_{e0}\nu_{e1}}{\nu_{e0}+\nu_{e1}}f(q),$$ where $$\nu_{e0}=r^2\Omega_\star q^2 \left (\frac{\Omega_\star}{N_{\mu}} \right )^4,$$
$$\nu_{e1}=r^2\Omega_\star max \left [\left (\frac{\Omega_\star}{N_T} \right )^{1/2} \left (\frac{\kappa}{r^2N_T}
\right )^{1/2},q^2\left (\frac{\Omega_\star}{N_T} \right )^4 \right ],$$
$r$ is the radial coordinate, $\Omega_\star$ is the rotation rate of the star, is $N_{\mu}$ the compositional buoyancy frequency, $N_T$ is the thermal part of buoyancy frequency, $q$ is the rotational gradient and $q_{\rm min}$ is minimum rotational gradient necessary for the dynamo to operate: $$f(q)=1-q_{\rm min}/q, (q>q_{\rm min}),$$ and $$f(q)=0, (q\le q_{\rm min}).$$ The factor $f(q)$ causes the stress to vanish smoothly as the gradient of the rotation rate approaches the minimum value required for dynamo action.
Fluid motions involved in the dynamo process also imply a certain amount of mixing. The effective diffusivity is given as: $$D_e=\frac{D_{e0}D_{e1}}{D_{e0}+D_{e1}}f(q),$$ where $f(q)$ is defined by Eq.(11) and $$D_{e0}=r^2\Omega_\star q^4 \left (\frac{\Omega_\star}{N_{\mu}} \right )^6,$$
$$D_{e1}=r^2\Omega_\star max \left [ \left (\frac{\Omega_\star}{N_T} \right )^{3/4} \left (\frac{\kappa}{r^2N_T}
\right )^{3/4},q^2 \left (\frac{\Omega_\star}{N_T} \right )^6 \right].$$
Models without magnetic field {#nonmagnetic}
=============================
Single stars {#single}
------------
It was shown by and @2000ApJ...528..368H that transport of angular momentum in stellar interiors depends strongly on the efficiency of the inhibition of the rotationally induced mixing processes by $\mu$-gradient. When rotationally induced mixing processes are not inhibited by $\mu$-gradient, stellar rotation remains close to rigid rotation. The star loses matter from the surface which carries away angular momentum. Layers beneath the lost ones expand, and due to local angular momentum conservation, spin down. The star reestablishes rigid rotation by transporting angular momentum from the core to the surface. When the rotationally induced mixing processes are inhibited by the $\mu$-gradient, angular momentum cannot be efficiently transported between the core and the envelope. The result is differential rotation between these two stellar regions. In this paper we present models which include the inhibiting effect of $\mu$-gradient on rotationally induced mixing processes.
We calculate the evolution of a 20$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ star until the end of core carbon burning. This star is a rigidly rotating star on the ZAMS (Fig. \[core20\], three dots-dashed line) with an initial surface velocity of $v_{\rm surf}$=200$\rm~km~s^{-1}$, which is a typical value for these stars [@1982PASP...94..271F]. During its hydrogen core burning phase, this star loses mass due to a stellar winds ($\sim$10$^{-8}\,\mathrm
{M}_{\odot} \rm~yr^{-1}$). Matter lost from the stellar surface carries away angular momentum, the surface layers spin down, but there is no efficient transport of angular momentum between the core and the envelope, so the core does not spin down significantly. At the time of helium ignition (Fig. \[core20\],dot-dashed line), the specific angular momentum of the core is $j$$\sim$10$^{17} \rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$ at 3$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ (further in the paper, specific angular momentum values are always given at 3$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$, since that is the mass of the final core before supernova explosion). After core hydrogen exhaustion, the star evolves into a red supergiant, its core contracts while the envelope expands. This leads to a spin-up of the core and a spin-down of the envelope. The envelope is convective and rotating almost rigidly with a very low rotational velocity ($\sim$0.1$\rm~
km~s^{-1}$). The core is rigidly rotating with a maximum rotational velocity of $\sim$130$\rm~km~s^{-1}$. The core and the envelope are separated by layers that have a large $\mu$-gradient. This suppresses rotationally induced mixing and angular momentum is not efficiently transported, so that the core is not slowed down by the slow rotation of the envelope. At the end of helium core burning the specific angular momentum of the core is $j$$\sim$5$\cdot$10$^{16} \rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$ (Fig. \[core20\], dotted line). During further evolution, i.e., core carbon burning, the stellar core does not lose any significant amounts of angular momentum.
To investigate the behaviour of higher mass stars, we modeled the evolution of a 42$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ star with the same initial surface rotational velocity $v_{\rm surf}$=200$\rm~km~s^{-1}$. The star is a rigidly rotating star on the ZAMS with the specific angular momentum profile shown on Fig. \[core42\] (dot-dashed line). As we already explained for the previous example, the star loses mass due to a stellar wind ($\sim$10$^{-7}\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot} \rm~yr^{-1}$). Since the stellar wind mass loss rate is one order of magnitude higher than for a 20$\,\mathrm
{M}_{\odot}$ star, the 42$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ star loses more matter and angular momentum during the core hydrogen burning phase. When helium ignites in the core, the specific angular momentum at 3$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ is $\sim$8$\cdot$10$^{16}\rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$. The star becomes a $\sim$38$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ red supergiant with central helium burning in a convective core of $\sim$12$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ and a convective envelope of $\sim$20$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$. Due to stellar wind mass loss of $\sim$10$^{-4} \,\mathrm{M}_{\odot} \rm~yr^{-1}$, the mass of the envelope rapidly decreases and reaches $\sim$10$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ at the end of our calculations.
We follow the evolution of this star until it burned $\sim$30% of the helium in its core. The specific angular momentum of the core (at 3$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$) at that moment is $\sim$6.5$\cdot$10$^{16}\rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$. If we assume that the angular momentum of the core decreases further during helium core burning with the same rate, the specific angular momentum of the core at the moment of helium exhaustion would be $\sim$3.5$\cdot$10$^{16}\rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$. We see in Fig. \[core20\] that there is no angular momentum loss from the core during core carbon burning, so we can conclude that this star might produce a collapsar and in case that the hydrogen envelope is lost during the red the supergiant phase, a gamma-ray burst can be the result.
![\[core20\]Specific angular momentum profiles of a 20$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ single star on the hydrogen ZAMS (three dots-dashed line), when helium ignites in the core, (dot-dashed line), when the central helium abundance is 67% (dashed-line), in the moment of core helium exhaustion (dotted line) and at core carbon exhaustion (solid line.)](2545fig1.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
![\[jt20\]Logarithm of the integrated angular momentum, $J(m)$=$\int_{0}^{M}j(m^{\prime})dm^{\prime}$ divided by $m^{5/3}$, as a function of the mass coordinate, $m$, for a 20$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ star for the same evolutionary stages as shown in Fig. \[core20\]. The thin lines give a logarithmic scale of levels of constant $J$ labeled with $\rm log(J/\rm (erg~s))$.](2545fig2.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
For a rigidly rotating body of constant density $\rho_0$, the total angular momentum, $J(m)$, enclosed below the mass coordinate, $m$, is $J(m)$=$\int_{0}^{M}j(m^{\prime})dm$. In Fig. \[jt20\] and Fig. \[jt42\] we plot the logarithm of $J(m)/m^{5/3}$ as a function of mass and a grid of lines of $J$=$const$. If angular momentum is transported throughout the surface defined by a mass coordinate $m$, $J(m)$ drops. If no such transport occurs, $J(m)$ remains constant. If a line of constant $J$ is followed from one evolutionary stage to another, it can be seen to what mass coordinate the angular momentum has been transported in the star during the time between the two evolutionary stages.
![\[core42\]Specific angular momentum profiles of a 42$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ single star on the hydrogen ZAMS (dot-dashed line), when helium ignites in the center (dotted line), and when the central helium abundance is 67% (solid line).](2545fig3.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
![\[jt42\]Logarithm of the integrated angular momentum $J(m)$=$\int_{0}^{M}j(m^{\prime})dm^{\prime}$ divided by $m^{5/3}$, as a function of the mass coordinate $m$ for a 42$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ star for the same evolutionary stages as shown on Fig. \[core42\]. The thin lines give a logarithmic scale of levels of constant $J$ labeled with $\rm log(J/\rm (erg~s))$.](2545fig4.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
Binary systems {#binary}
--------------
A star evolving in a binary system and accreting matter from the companion, increases its surface angular momentum. If this angular momentum can be transported efficiently through the stellar interior, the star may evolve into a red supergiant that has a rapidly spinning core with sufficient specific angular momentum to produce a collapsar.
To check if accretion can add enough angular momentum to the core, we modeled the evolution of a rotating binary system with initial masses of $M_{\rm 1,in}$=56$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ and $M_{\rm 2,in}$=33$\,\mathrm
{M}_{\odot}$ and an initial orbital period of $p_{\rm in}$=6 days. The binary system quickly synchronizes during the main sequence evolution. Due to this synchronization, both stars lose angular momentum and their initial surface rotational velocities are 92$\rm~km~s^{-1}$ for the primary and 64$\rm~km~s^{-1}$ for the secondary which is much slower than the typical values for single stars of these masses [@2000ApJ...528..368H]. This means that stars in binary systems lose a significant amount of angular momentum due to synchronization. The angular momentum loss increases with the initial orbital period.
Evolutionary tracks of the primary and the secondary star are given in Fig. \[prim\] and Fig. \[secon\]. The primary is initially the more massive star; it evolves faster and fills its Roche lobe during hydrogen core burning. The binary system enters Case A of mass transfer (dotted line, Fig. \[prim\]). The primary loses matter with a high mass transfer rate ($\dot M_{\rm tr}^{\rm
max}$$\sim$3.2$\cdot$10$^{-3} \,\mathrm{M}_{\odot} \rm~yr^{\rm -1}$) and decreases in luminosity. During the fast phase of Case A mass transfer, the primary loses $\sim$19$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ and the secondary accretes only about $15$% of that matter due to the stellar wind mass loss caused by rotation close to break-up [@2004AAinprep]. After the fast process of Case A mass transfer, the primary continues to expand on a nuclear time scale and transfer mass onto the secondary star with mass transfer rate of $\sim$10$^{-6}\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot} \rm~yr^{-1}$ (slow phase of Case A). At the end of core hydrogen burning the primary contracts and thus Roche lobe overflow (RLOF) stops. When the primary starts hydrogen shell burning ($M$=16.6$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$) it expands again, fills its Roche lobe and Case AB mass transfer starts. We assume that this mass transfer stops when the WR star has 5% of hydrogen on its surface ($M_{\rm WR}(X_{\rm s}$=0.05)=14.8$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$). More details about the evolution of this system up to WR+O phase can be seen in @2004AAinprep. As explained in Sect. \[comp\], we continue following the evolution of the binary system with a hydrogen-free WR star. The dashed line on Fig. \[prim\] connects the last calculated model at the onset of Case AB and the first calculated model when the primary is a hydrogen-free WR star. The initial hydrogen-free WR star is $M_{\rm WR}$=12.8$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ with an effective temperature of $\sim$1.2$\cdot$10$^5 \rm~K$, and it loses $\sim$8$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ due to WR mass loss during core helium burning. Due to this mass loss, the luminosity of the primary decreases (dash-dotted line Fig. \[prim\]). The primary ends carbon core burning (dot-dashed line Fig. \[prim\]) as $\sim$4.5 solar mass star. The orbital period of the binary system is $\sim$13.5 days when the primary explodes in a supernova.
![\[prim\]Evolutionary track of the primary in HR diagram. Solid line: core hydrogen burning phase before and after Case A mass transfer. Dotted line: Case A mass transfer. Dashed line: connection between last calculated model at the onset of Case AB and first calculated model when the primary is a hydrogen-free WR star. Dash-dotted line: core helium burning phase. Dot-dashed line: core carbon burning phase. ](2545fig5.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
The secondary begins its evolution as a 33$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ core hydrogen burning star. It accretes $\sim$3$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ during the fast phase and $\sim$4$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ during the slow phase of Case A mass transfer. Due to this mass gain, the luminosity of the secondary increases (Fig. \[secon\]). As we already mentioned, the primary loses $\sim$1.8$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ during Case AB. We assume the same average accretion efficiency during this mass transfer as during the fast phase of Case A mass transfer ($\beta$=0.15), since they both take place on the thermal time scale. This means that the secondary accretes $\sim$0.25$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ and after Case AB mass transfer, it is still a core hydrogen burning star, more massive than at the beginning of its main sequence evolution (39.25$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$). After the secondary exhausted all hydrogen in the core, it contracts and increase its luminosity and effective temperature. Due to the increase of temperature in the envelope, the star ignites hydrogen in a shell, expands and cools down drastically (dash-dotted line Fig. \[secon\], $R$$\approx$2300$\rm~R_{\odot}$, $T_{\rm {eff}}$$\approx$3500$\rm~K$). Meanwhile, the core contracts further and the core temperature increases. Helium core burning starts when $T_{\rm
c}$$\approx$1.4$\cdot$10$^8 \rm~K$. We stopped detailed modeling when the secondary has $\sim$67% of helium left in the core.
![\[secon\]Evolutionary track of the secondary in the HR diagram. Solid line: core hydrogen burning phase before and after Case A and Case AB mass transfer. Dotted line: Case A mass transfer. Dash-dotted line: core helium burning phase.](2545fig6.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
Fig. \[evol\] shows the evolution of the internal structure of the secondary from the ZAMS, through Case A and Case AB mass transfer and the red supergiant phase until $Y_{\rm c}$=0.67. The secondary starts its main sequence evolution as a 33$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ star with a convective core of $\sim$20$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$. Rotationally induced mixing processes take place in the radiative envelope of the star. The secondary then accretes $\sim$3$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ during the fast phase and $\sim$4$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ during the slow phase of Case A mass transfer. Heavier elements accreted on the surface are relocated by thermohaline mixing process and the convective core increases its mass ($\sim$25$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$). The secondary becomes a rejuvenated $\sim$39$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ core hydrogen burning star in a WR+O binary system. The system is likely to be disrupted by the explosion of the primary while the secondary is still a main sequence star. Details of the evolution of the internal structure of the secondary after the primary exploded are shown in Fig. \[sec\]. After hydrogen is exhausted in the core, the secondary becomes a $\sim$37$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ red supergiant with central helium burning in convective core of $\sim$12$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ and a convective envelope of $\sim$20$\,\mathrm
{M}_{\odot}$. Due to stellar wind mass loss of $\sim$10$^{-4} \,\mathrm
M_{\odot} \rm~yr^{-1}$, the mass of the envelope rapidly decreases and reaches $\sim$10$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ at the end of our calculations.
![\[evol\]Evolution of the internal structure of a rotating 33$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ secondary from the ZAMS until red supergiant phase $Y_{\rm c}$=0.67. Convection is indicated with diagonal hatching, semiconvection with crossed hatching and thermohaline mixing with straight crossed hatching. The hatched area at the bottom indicates nuclear burning. Gray shaded areas represent regions with rotationally induced mixing (intensity is indicated with different shades, the darker the colour, the stronger rotational mixing). The topmost solid line corresponds to the surface of the star.](2545fig7.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
![\[sec\]Evolution of the internal structure of a rotating 33$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ secondary from SN explosion of the primary and disruption of the system. See Fig. \[evol\] for an explanation of the different hatching types.](2545fig8.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
The modeled binary system starts its evolution with both components synchronized to the orbital rotation. The surface rotational velocity of the secondary star is $\sim$64$~\rm km~s^{-1}$. When the fast Case A mass transfer starts, the secondary accretes matter from the primary with high mass transfer rates ($\sim$10$^{-3} \,\mathrm
{M}_{\odot} \rm~yr^{-1}$). This matter carries angular momentum and spins up the top layers of the secondary star (Fig. \[vsurf\]). The mass transfer rate during the slow phase of Case A is significantly lower (10$^{-6}\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot} \rm~yr^{-1}$) and the surface rotational velocity of the secondary increases to about 200$~\rm km~s^{-1}$. For Case AB we assumed a mass transfer rate of $\sim$10$^{-4} \,\mathrm{M}_{\odot} \rm~yr^{-1}$ (Sect. \[comp\]) and this spins up the surface of the secondary to $\sim$500$\rm~km~s^{-1}$. When the secondary spins up to close to critical rotation it loses more mass according to Eq. 2 . High mass loss decreases the net accretion efficiency and also removes angular momentum from the secondary star. The secondary star is also spun-down by tidal forces that tend to synchronize it with the orbital motion [@2004AAinprep]. After Case AB mass transfer, the secondary will synchronize with the orbital motion in the WR+O binary system. After the SN explosion of the primary, the secondary becomes a red supergiant with a very slowly rotating envelope and its surface rotational velocity drops to less than 0.02$~\rm km~s^{-1}$.
![\[vsurf\]Surface rotational velocity of the secondary star. Matter transfered from the primary with high mass transfer rate $\sim$10$^{-3}$-10$^{-4} \,\mathrm{M}_{\odot} \rm~yr^{-1}$ during the fast phase of Case A and Case AB spins up the surface layers of the secondary up to 500-700$\rm~km~s^{-1}$. During the slow phase of Case A mass transfer rate is lower ($\sim$10$^{-6} \,\mathrm
{M}_{\odot} \rm~yr^{-1}$) and surface rotational velocity increases up to $\sim$200$\rm~km~s^{-1}$. After Case AB mass transfer the secondary synchronizes with the orbital motion in the WR+O binary system. After the SN explosion of the primary, the secondary star evolves into a red supergiant with slowly rotating envelope of $\sim$0.02$\rm~km~s^{-1}$.](2545fig9.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
Fig. \[vrot\] shows rotational velocity profiles of the secondary star in different evolutionary phases. The surface of the secondary gains additional angular momentum during mass transfer, as we already explained. This angular momentum is transported through the stellar interior, and into the core. The result is that the stellar core spins faster on the helium ZAMS (Fig. \[vrot\], three dots-dashed line) than at the beginning of hydrogen core burning (Fig. \[vrot\], solid line). After this, the core contracts and further increases its rotational velocity, and the envelope expands and slows down. When the central abundance of helium is around 67%, the maximum rotational velocity of the core is $\sim$100$~\rm km~s^{-1}$.
![\[vrot\]Rotational velocity profiles of the secondary star on the hydrogen ZAMS (solid line), after the fast (dotted line) and the slow (short dashed line) phase of Case A mass transfer, after Case AB mass transfer (dash-dotted line), when helium ignites in the core (three dots-dashed line) and when the central helium abundance is 67% (long dashed-line). ](2545fg10.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
Fig. \[core\] shows specific angular momentum profiles of the secondary at different points of its evolution. The specific angular momentum of the secondary increases significantly due to fast Case A mass transfer (Fig. \[core\], dotted line). After this, the secondary loses angular momentum due to stellar wind mass loss, but also gains certain amount through slow Case A and Case AB mass transfer (Fig. \[core\], dashed and dot-dashed line). The result is that the core has a larger specific angular momentum when central helium burning starts than at the beginning of hydrogen core burning. After core hydrogen exhaustion, the secondary evolves into a red supergiant, the core contracts and the envelope expands. This leads to a spin-up of the core and a spin-down of the envelope. The specific angular momentum of the core at 3$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ is $\sim$5.5$\cdot$10$^{16} \rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$ (Fig. \[core\], three dot-dashed line). The envelope is convective and slowly rotating ($\sim$0.02$~\rm km~s^{-1}$). The core is rigidly rotating with maximum rotational velocity of $\sim$100$~\rm km~s^{-1}$. The core and the envelope are separated by layers that have a high $\mu$-gradient. Angular momentum is not efficiently transported through these layers, so the core is not slowed down by the slow rotation of the envelope. When a third of the central helium supply is exhausted, the core (at 3$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$) has a specific angular momentum of $\sim$5$\cdot$10$^{16} \rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$. If we assume that the angular momentum of the core decreases further during helium core burning with the same rate, specific angular momentum of the core at the moment of helium exhaustion is expected to be $\sim$4$\cdot$10$^{16}\rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$. As we have already seen for single stars, there is no angular momentum loss from the core during core carbon burning, so we can conclude that this star has enough angular momentum to produce a collapsar and, in the case that the hydrogen envelope is lost during red supergiant phase, a gamma-ray burst.
![\[core\]Specific angular momentum profiles of the secondary star on the hydrogen ZAMS (long dashed line), after fast (dotted line) and slow (short dashed line) Case A mass transfer, after Case AB mass transfer (dash-dotted line), when helium ignites in the core (three dots-dashed line) and when the central helium abundance is 67% (solid line).](2545fg11.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
![\[jt\]Logarithm of the integrated angular momentum $J(m)$=$\int_{0}^{M}j(m^{\prime})dm^{\prime}$ divided by $m^{5/3}$, as a function of the mass coordinate $m$ for a 33$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ secondary star for the same evolutionary stages as shown in Fig. \[core\]. The thin lines give a logarithmic scale of levels of constant $J$ labeled with $\rm log(J/\rm (erg~s))$.](2545fg12.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
The gain of angular momentum of an accreting star is proportional to the amount of accreted matter. We show in Fig. \[core2\] specific angular momentum profiles of the secondary ($X_c$=0, $T_c$=1.4$\cdot$10$^8 \rm~K$) assuming the accretion of 0.25, 1.4 and 5$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ during Case AB mass transfer. We see that the specific angular momentum of the core is higher if the star accreted more matter during mass transfer. The specific angular momentum of the core at 3$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ increases from 6$\cdot$10$^{16} \rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$ to 8$\cdot$10$^{16} \rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$.
![\[core2\]Specific angular momentum profiles of the secondary star on the hydrogen ZAMS (solid line) and when helium ignites in the core ($T_c$=1.4$\cdot$10$^8\rm~K$), assuming the accretion of 0.25$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ (dotted line) 1.4$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ (dashed line) or 5$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ (dot-dashed line) during Case AB mass transfer.](2545fg13.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
Models with magnetic field {#magnetic}
==========================
Single stars {#magsingle}
------------
We model the evolution of a single 42$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ star with an initial rotational surface velocity of 200$~\rm km~s^{-1}$ and magnetic field included. Fig. \[coremag\] shows specific angular momentum profiles in different phases of the evolution. We see that the initial (ZAMS) profiles of the star without magnetic field (Fig. \[core42\], dot-dashed line) and the star with magnetic field (Fig. \[coremag\], dot-dashed line) are identical and represent solid body rotation. We notice, however, that the magnetic star loses more angular momentum from the core during the main sequence evolution as well as between hydrogen core exhaustion (Fig. \[coremag\], dashed line) and core helium ignition (Fig. \[coremag\], solid line).
The star loses mass by a stellar wind. This removes angular momentum from the surface layers and slows them down. Since the magnetic torque keeps the star close to solid body rotation during the main sequence evolution (Fig. \[magomega\]), however, angular momentum is transported from the stellar interior towards the surface. The viscosity due to the magnetic field is a few orders of magnitude larger than the one for rotational mixing ($\sim$10$^{{10}-{12}}\rm~
cm^2~s^{-1}$ compared with $\sim$10$^{{7}-{8}}\rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$), and it can overcome the $\mu$-gradient barrier. Therefore, the surface of the star is spun up and the core is slowed down. The surface layers rotate faster than in the corresponding non-magnetic star, and the stellar wind mass loss is higher (Fig. \[magml\]).
Summarizing, the core of a magnetic star loses significantly more angular momentum during the main sequence evolution than when magnetic fields are not included. One reason is that the $\mu$-gradient does not represent a strong barrier for angular momentum transport. And second, because the surface layers are spun-up, the stellar wind mass loss is larger and this requires more angular momentum from the core to keep solid body rotation of the star. When hydrogen burning is finished ($T_c$=0.8$\cdot 10^8 \rm~K$), the specific angular momentum of the core (at 3$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$) is less than 3$\cdot10^{16} \rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$ (Fig. \[coremag\], dashed line).
When the star expands after core hydrogen burning, magnetic torques still work toward enforcing solid body rotation. The envelope expansion, however, is too fast and angular momentum transport is not efficient enough, to keep the envelope synchronized with the core (Fig. \[magomega\]). Since magnetic viscosity can overcome the $\mu$-gradient, the core is slowed down and the envelope is spun up. Stellar wind mass loss is enhanced due to faster rotation and is significantly higher than in the case of the non-magnetic star (Fig. \[magml\]). The star loses significant an amount of angular momentum between hydrogen exhaustion and helium ignition and the specific angular momentum of the core (at 3$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$) at the time helium core burning starts is only 5$\cdot10^{15} \rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$.
![\[coremag\]Specific angular momentum profiles of the 42$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ single star with magnetic fields on the hydrogen ZAMS (dot-dashed line), when 50% of hydrogen is left in the center (dotted line), when hydrogen is exhausted in the core (dashed line) and when central helium burning starts (solid line).](2545fg14.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
![\[magomega\]Spin period profiles of the 42$\,\mathrm
{M}_{\odot}$ single star on the ZAMS (solid line), when 50% hydrogen is left in the center (dotted line), when hydrogen is exhausted in the core (dashed line), and when central helium burning starts (dot-dashed line).](2545fg15.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
![\[magml\]Stellar wind mass loss of the magnetic (dotted line) and non-magnetic (solid line) 42$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ star. The star with magnetic fields loses more mass because magnetic torques transport angular momentum, which spins-up the surface layers and enhances mass loss. ](2545fg16.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
![\[diff\]Effective viscosities due to magnetic torques (solid line) and due to rotational instabilities (dotted line) for a rotating 42$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ star at a central hydrogen abundance of 50% and at core hydrogen exhaustion.](2545fg17.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
Binary systems {#magbinary}
--------------
We modeled the evolution of a rotating binary system with magnetic fields, initial masses $M_{\rm 1,in}$=56$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ and $M_{\rm
2,in}$=33$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$, and an initial orbital period of $p_{\rm
in}$=6 days. The binary system starts synchronized on the ZAMS with initial surface rotational velocities of $\sim$90$~\rm km~s^{-1}$ for the primary and $\sim$60$~\rm km~s^{-1}$ for the secondary which is, as we already mentioned for non-magnetic models, much slower than the typical values for single stars of these masses.
During the fast phase of Case A mass transfer ($\dot
M_{tr}$$\sim$10$^{-3} \,\mathrm{M}_{\odot} \rm~yr^{-1}$), the primary loses $\sim$20$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ and the secondary accretes only about 4.5$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ of that matter due to the mass loss caused by rotation close to break-up. After the fast process of Case A mass transfer, the primary continues to expand on a nuclear time scale and to transfer mass onto the secondary star, but with much lower mass transfer rates (slow Case A, $\dot M_{tr}$$\sim$10$^{-6} \,\mathrm
{M}_{\odot} \rm~yr^{-1}$). At the end of core hydrogen burning the primary contracts and thus RLOF stops.
Accretion increases rotational velocity of the surface of the secondary star to almost 400$~\rm km~s^{-1}$ during the fast phase of Case A mass transfer. The mass transfer rate during slow Case A mass transfer is significantly lower (10$^{-6}\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot} \rm~yr^{-1}$), and the surface rotational velocity of the secondary increases to about 200$~\rm km~s^{-1}$.
Fig. \[magbincore\] shows specific angular momentum profiles of the secondary at different phases of evolution. The specific angular momentum of the secondary increases significantly due to the fast Case A mass transfer (Fig. \[magbincore\], dotted line). Angular momentum is transported more efficiently through the stellar interior compared to the non-magnetic model, since the incurred magnetic torques are a few orders of magnitude more efficient in angular momentum transport than the rotational instabilities (Fig. \[diff\]). Comparing the specific angular momentum of the non-magnetic (Fig. \[core\]) and magnetic model (Fig. \[magbincore\]), we notice that during fast Case A the angular momentum of the magnetic star increases more than that of the corresponding non-magnetic star (2$\cdot$10$^{17}\rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$ for magnetic and 1.25$\cdot$10$^{17}\rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$ for non-magnetic star, $\sim$10$^4\rm~yrs$ after fast Case A, at 3$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$).
The accretion stops when the secondary still has almost 50% of the hydrogen to burn in the core. Angular momentum is efficiently transported from the stellar core to the surface and the $\mu$-gradient can not stop it as in the case of the non-magnetic star. During further main sequence evolution, the stellar core loses significant angular momentum and when hydrogen core burning stops, the specific angular momentum at 3$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ is 2$\cdot$10$^{16}\rm
~cm^2~s^{-1}$. Before helium ignites in the core, the specific angular momentum decreases to 6$\cdot$10$^{15}\rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$. The further evolution through the red supergiant phase slows down the core, since the envelope slows it down (magnetic viscosity can overcome the $\mu$-barrier).
![\[magconv\]Evolution of the internal structure of a rotating 33$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ secondary star with magnetic field from the ZAMS until red supergiant phase $Y_{\rm c}$=0.92. See Fig. \[evol\] for an explanation of the different hatching types.](2545fg18.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
![\[magconv\]Evolution of the internal structure of a rotating 33$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ secondary star with magnetic field from after the SN explosion of the primary and disruption of the system. See Fig. \[evol\] for an explanation of the different hatching types.](2545fg19.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
![\[magbincore\]Specific angular momentum profiles of the secondary star with magnetic fields on the hydrogen ZAMS (long dashed line), after fast (dotted line) and slow (short dashed line) Case A mass transfer, when all hydrogen is exhausted in the center (dot-dashed line), when helium ignites (three dots-dashed line) and and when the central helium abundance is 92% (solid line).](2545fg20.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
Apparently, if a star with magnetic fields accretes matter half way in the main sequence evolution, it has enough time to lose angular momentum before hydrogen is exhausted in the core. This is why we compute models of non-magnetic and magnetic 33$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ stars that accrete 2$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ at the end of their main sequence evolution ($Y_c$=0.95). We assume an initial surface velocity of these stars of $\sim$60$~\rm km~s^{-1}$ since they evolve in a binary system.
When the central helium abundance reaches 95%, the core of the 33$\,\mathrm
{M}_{\odot}$ star with magnetic fields has a specific angular momentum of about 2$\cdot$10$^{16}\rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$ (Fig. \[accmagcore\], dotted line). On the other hand, the core of a star without magnetic fields hardly loses any angular momentum and its specific angular momentum is 4$\cdot$10$^{16}\rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$ (Fig. \[acccore\], dotted line). After this, both stars accrete 2$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ of matter with an accretion rate of 10$^{-4}\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot} \rm~yr^{-1}$. We assume that in this case stellar wind mass loss is not enhanced by rotation, so there is no additional angular momentum loss due to this effect. Accreted matter adds angular momentum to the surface layers and this angular momentum is then transported through the stellar interior much more efficiently in the model with magnetic field. At the end of accretion (Fig. \[acccore\] and Fig. \[accmagcore\], dashed line), angular momentum has been transported further inward in the magnetic star than in the non-magnetic star. If we look at the specific angular momentum profiles 10$^4\rm~yrs$ after the accretion ended, we can notice that the specific angular momentum of the core of the magnetic star increases to almost 3$\cdot$10$^{16}\rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$ (at 3$\,\mathrm
{M}_{\odot}$). On the other hand, in the non-magnetic star angular momentum has been transported inward but still has not reached the core.
The magnetic star continues to lose angular momentum from the core during the remaining main sequence evolution ($\sim$10$^5 \rm~yrs$), and when hydrogen is exhausted in the core the specific angular momentum at 3$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ is 1.6$\cdot$10$^{16}\rm~
cm^2~s^{-1}$. As explained above, in the magnetic model, the core loses significant amounts of angular momentum between core hydrogen exhaustion and core helium ignition, and when central helium burning starts, the specific angular momentum of the core at 3$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ is only 6$\cdot$10$^{15}\rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$.
![\[accrotconv\]Evolution of the internal structure of a rotating 33$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ secondary star until helium ignition in the core. The star accretes 2$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ when the central helium abundance is 95%. See Fig. \[evol\] for an explanation of the different hatching types.](2545fg21.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
![\[accmagconv\]Evolution of the internal structure of a rotating 33$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ secondary star with magnetic field until helium ignition in the core. The star accretes 2$\,\mathrm
{M}_{\odot}$ when the central helium abundance is 95%. See Fig. \[evol\] for an explanation of the different hatching types.](2545fg22.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
![\[acccore\]Specific angular momentum profiles of a 33$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ non-magnetic star on the ZAMS (long dashed line), when $Y_c$=95% (dotted line), at the end of the accretion (dashed line), 10$^4\rm~yrs$ after the accretion (dot-dashed line), when hydrogen is exhausted in the core (three dot-dashed line) and when helium ignites in the core (solid line).](2545fg23.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
![\[accmagcore\]Specific angular momentum profiles of a 33$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ magnetic star on the ZAMS (long dashed line), when $Y_c$=95% (dotted line), at the end of the accretion (dashed line), 10$^4\rm~yrs$ after the accretion (dot-dashed line), when hydrogen is exhausted in the core (three dot-dashed line) and when helium ignites in the core (solid line).](2545fg24.ps){width="\columnwidth"}
Conclusions {#concl}
===========
The single star models presented above confirm that non-magnetic stars in the mass range relevant for GRB production through collapsars may retain enough core angular momentum for a GRB to form. In particular, the stars that evolve into red supergiants and become Wolf-Rayet stars only at the end of core helium burning can avoid a significant core angular momentum loss through Wolf-Rayet winds and may retain a specific angular momentum of up to 10$^{17}\rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$ in their iron cores. In these models, an effective core angular momentum loss during the main sequence is prevented by the suppression of rotational mixing in regions containing a mean molecular weight gradient. Angular momentum loss from the stellar core during helium burning is insignificant. Contrary to the trend found in @2000ApJ...528..368H, we find that a 42$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ star may end its life with a larger specific core angular momentum than a 20$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$. The reason is that, for the same initial equatorial rotation velocity, the initial specific angular momentum in the 42$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ is significantly larger due to its larger initial radius. We note that a similar trend has been found by .
The dynamo model of cause a significant angular momentum transport even in the presence of mean molecular weight gradients. @2004IAUS..215b already found the increased coupling of core and envelope to result in iron core specific angular momenta of the order of 10$^{14}\rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$ for stars between 10 and 25$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$. Our magnetic 42$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ single star model was only computed up to core helium ignition. By then, however, the specific core angular momentum was already reduced by a factor of 30 from the initial value. @2004IAUS..215b showed that during core helium burning the core-envelope coupling reduces the core angular momentum by another order of magnitude. The final specific core angular momentum in our 42$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ star can thus be estimated to fall below $\sim$10$^{15}\rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$, which will render effects of rotation during the core collapse insignificant.
We also model the evolution of a 56$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$+33$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ binary system with an initial orbital period of 6 days. Since the binary-enhanced mass loss of the primary leads to extremely slow rotation, our attention focuses on the secondary star, which is spun-up due to accretion of mass and angular momentum. We computed two binary evolution sequences, with and without magnetic fields. In both sequences, the initial 33$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ star grows to about 40$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ due to accretion during its main sequence evolution, and subsequently evolves into a red supergiant. Before the mass transfer, tidal spin-orbit coupling leads to bound rotation of both stars and to a specific angular momentum which is a factor of $3..5$ smaller than in a corresponding single star.
The accretion leads to a significant spin-up of the star. In the non-magnetic model, the mean molecular weight gradient limits the inward diffusion of angular momentum, and the corresponding spin-up of the core merely compensates the tidally induced angular momentum loss. The result is a helium core that rotationally decouples from the envelope with roughly the same mass and angular momentum as in the case of a 42$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ single star, i.e., with high enough specific angular momentum to produce a GRB.
In the magnetic model, the core spin-up due to accretion is stronger. It temporarily leads to a core spin rate which is factor of $2..3$ above that of a ZAMS star of comparable mass. Magnetic core-envelope coupling, however, has reduced the specific core angular momentum by almost a factor 100 by the time the star has started core helium burning. Its final core angular momentum will thus be comparable to that of the magnetic 42$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ single star model discussed above: probably too small to produce a GRB.
Clearly, the effect of core spin-up due to accretion on the final core angular momentum will be larger if the accretion occurs later in the evolution of the accretion star, as there will be less time to lose again the angular momentum gained by accretion. Therefore, we performed the numerical experiment of accreting 2$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ of material on a 33$\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ at a time when the core hydrogen concentration was down to 5% (instead of about 40% in the binary evolution model). The result was again that the core-envelope coupling in the magnetic model was overwhelming and prevents this scenario to be a realistic option for GRB production.
We conclude that our binary models without magnetic field can reproduce stellar cores with a high enough specific angular momentum ($j$$\ge$3$\cdot$10$^{16}\rm~cm^2~s^{-1}$) to produce a collapsar and a GRB.
If magnetic field is taken into consideration, however, GRBs at near solar metallicity need to be produced in rather exotic binary channels, or the magnetic effects are overestimated in our current models. The first option is not implausible, since reverse mass transfer from the original secondary star onto the primary star during its Wolf-Rayet phase , or late stellar merger may lead to an efficient core spin-up. The realization frequency of such events, however, even though it is difficult to estimate, may still be small. The latter would require a significant angular momentum loss from the iron core, either during collapse or from the proto-neutron star, in order to explain the relatively slow rotation rates of young pulsars [cf., however, @2004astro.ph..9422H].
AH has been supported under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by its contract W-7405-ENG-36 to the Los Alamos National Laboratory, by DOE SciDAC grant DE-FC02-01ER41176, and by NASA grant SWIF03-0047-0037.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We studied a unified approach with the holographic, new agegraphic and the $f(R)$ dark energy model to construct the form of $f(R)$ which in general responsible for the curvature driven explanation of the very early inflation along with presently observed late time acceleration. We considered the generalized uncertainty principle in our approach which incorporated the corrections in the entropy area relation and thereby modified the energy densities for the cosmological dark energy models considered. We found that holographic and new agegraphic $f(R)$ gravity models can behave like phantom or quintessence models in the spatially flat FRW universe. We also found a distinct term in the form of $f(R)$ which goes as $R^{\frac{3}{2}}$ due to the consideration of the GUP modified energy densities. Although the presence of this term in the action can have its importance in explaining the early inflationary scenario but Capozziello [*et.al.*]{} recently showed that $f(R) \sim R^{\frac{3}{2}}$ leads to an accelerated expansion, [*i.e.*]{}, a negative value for the deceleration parameter $q$ which fit well with SNeIa and WMAP data. Keywords: modified gravity, dark energy, generalized uncertainty principle'
---
[**f(R) in Holographic and Agegraphic Dark Energy Models and the Generalized Uncertainty Principle**]{} 0.5cm Barun Majumder[^1] 0.6cm [Indian Institute of Technology - Gandhinagar\
Ahmedabad, Gujarat 382424\
India]{}
Introduction {#introduction .unnumbered}
============
Observations of type IA supernovae confirms that our present universe is expanding at an accelerating rate [@f1]. Present observational cosmology has provided enough evidence in favour of the accelerated expansion of the universe [@f2; @f3; @f4]. Theoretical aid came in the form of exotic Dark Energy (DE) which can generate sufficient negative pressure and is believed to account nearly 70% of present energy of the universe. Researchers in theoretical physics have proposed many DE models but they face problems while incorporating the history of the universe. The models generally have many free parameters and face serious constraints from observational data. Recent reviews [@f5add; @f5; @f6; @f7; @f7add] are useful for a brief knowledge of DE models.
The holographic DE is one of the promising DE model and the model is based on the holographic principle [@f8; @f9; @f10; @f11; @f12]. Bekenstein’s entropy bound suggests that quantum field theory breaks down at large volumes. This can be reconciled by using a relation between UV and IR cutoffs such that $L^3 \Lambda^4 \leq L m_p^2$ where $m_p$ is the reduced Planck Mass ($m_p^{-2} = 8\pi G$). In this situation an effective local quantum field theory will give a good approximate description [@f13]. The holographic DE was first proposed in [@f14] following the line of [@f13] where the infrared cutoff is taken to be the size of event horizon for DE. The problem of cosmic coincidence can be resolved by the inflationary paradigm with minimal e-foldings in this model. Later this holographic DE was studied in detail by many authors [@f15; @f16; @f17; @f18; @f19; @f20; @f21; @f22; @f23; @f24]. Clearly it can be mentioned that black hole entropy bound played an important role in the interpretation of holographic dark energy model. Various theories of quantum gravity (e.g., [@my25; @my26; @my27; @my28; @my29; @my30; @my31]) have predicted the following form for the entropy of a black hole: $$S = \frac{A}{4l_p^2} + c_0 \ln \left( \frac{A}{4l_p^2} \right) + const.$$ $c_0$ is a model dependent parameter and $l_p$ is the Planck length. Many researchers have expressed a vested interest in fixing $c_0$ (the coefficient of the subleading logarithmic term) [@my25]. Recent rigorous calculations of loop quantum gravity predicts the value of $c_0$ to be -1/2 [@my31]. A entropy corrected holographic DE model (ECHDE) was proposed recently in [@f48] where the inflation was driven by ECHDE. The curvature perturbation may be generated through the curvaton and the only requirement remain as $H \simeq const$ [@wei68a; @wei68b].
Another promising DE candidate is the agegraphic DE and was proposed in [@f49]. Considering the quantum fluctuations of spacetime K$\acute{a}$rolyh$\acute{a}$zy and his collaborators [@f50; @f51; @f52] argued that in Minkowski spacetime any distance $t$ cannot be known to a better accuracy than $\delta t \sim t_p^{\frac{2}{3}}t^{\frac{1}{3}}$, where $t_p$ is the reduced Planck time. Based on the arguments of K$\acute{a}$rolyh$\acute{a}$zy it can be shown that for Minkowski spacetime the energy density of metric fluctuations is given by $\rho_{\Lambda} \sim \frac{m_p^2}{t^2}$ [@f53; @f54]. The agegraphic DE model considers spacetime and matter field fluctuations responsible for DE. If conformal time is considered in place of the age of the universe the model can describe the matter dominated epoch [@f55] with a natural solution to the coincidence problem [@f56] and is known as the new agegraphic DE model. The conformal time $eta$ is defined by $dt = a~d\eta$, where $t$ is the cosmic time and $a$ the scale factor. Many authors did some detailed study of this new agegraphic DE model [@f57; @f58; @f59; @f60].
Also we have other possible explanations for the cosmic acceleration, the different being the approach with $f(R)$ gravity, where $R$ is the scalar curvature. Other forms of $R$ along with $R$ in the Lagrangian can explain the observed acceleration without considering other additional components (the review [@f71] is useful). Among other existing theories $f(R)$ gravity models can be shown to be compatible with a matter dominated epoch transiting into an accelerating phase [@f88]. Also the forms of $f(R)$ with positive powers of curvature support the inflationary epoch and forms with negative powers of curvature serve as the effective DE responsible for cosmic acceleration and compatible with solar system experiments [@f89]. Also it is worth mentioning that these models face some challenges in the line of argument discussed in [@asph1; @asph2; @asphadd1; @asphadd2; @f103].
The idea that the uncertainty principle could be affected by gravity was given by Mead [@new19]. In the regime when the gravity is strong enough, conventional Heisenberg uncertainty relation is no longer satisfactory (though approximately but perfectly valid in low gravity regimes). Later modified commutation relations between position and momenta commonly known as Generalized Uncertainty Principle (GUP) were given by candidate theories of quantum gravity (String Theory, Doubly Special Relativity Theory and Black Hole Physics) with the prediction of a minimum measurable length [@new20; @new21; @new22; @new23; @new24; @new25; @new26; @new27; @new28; @new29]. Similar kind of commutation relation can also be found in the context of Polymer Quantization in terms of polymer mass scale [@new30]. Importance of the GUP can also be realized on the basis of simple gedanken experiments without any reference of a particular fundamental theory [@new27; @new28]. So we can think the GUP as a model independent concept, ideally perfect for the study of black hole entropy. The authors in [@new31] proposed a GUP which is consistent with DSR theory, string theory and black hole physics. This is approximately covariant under DSR transformations but not Lorentz covariant [@new29]. With the GUP as proposed by the authors in [@new31] we can arrive at the corrected entropy-area relation for a black hole which can be written in the following expansive form [@new37; @new]: $$\begin{aligned}
\label{ent}
S ~\simeq & ~\frac{A}{4l_p^2} + a~ \sqrt{\frac{A}{4l_p^2}} + b~ \ln \left(\frac{A}{4l_p^2}\right) \nonumber \\
& + \sum_{m=\frac{1}{2},\frac{3}{2},\ldots}^\infty d_m \left(\frac{A}{4l_p^2}\right)^{-m} +
\sum_{n=1,2,\ldots}^\infty c_n \left(\frac{A}{4l_p^2}\right)^{-n} + \mathit{const.} ~~.\end{aligned}$$ In this paper we will try to predict the form of $f(R)$ in holographic and new agegraphic DE models in the light of the generalized uncertainty principle [^2]. We will use eqn. (\[ent\]) to calculate the energy density for the models. Later we will construct the form of $f(R)$ and the equation of state parameter $\omega$ for each of these DE models. Although an earlier attempt is present in the literature for the reconstruction of $f(R)$ [@f] but we will later conclude with a brief comparison of the results.
f(R) from Holographic DE model with GUP {#fr-from-holographic-de-model-with-gup .unnumbered}
=======================================
In $f(R)$ gravity the action is written as [@sud59; @sud60; @sud61] $$S = \int \sqrt{-g}~ d^4x \left(\frac{R+f(R)}{16\pi G} + L_{matter}\right) ~~.$$ The considerations lies in the fact that the higher order modifications of the Ricci curvature $R$ in the form of $R^2$ or $R_{\mu \nu}R^{\mu \nu}$ could give rise to inflation at the very early universe [^3]. So this lead to a notion that whether inverse powers in $R$ dominant in late time universe can give an explanation to the recent predicted acceleration of the universe. But this type of models face problems of stability [@sud11]. The variation of the action with respect to the metric gives the field equations as $$R_{\mu \nu} - \frac{1}{2}R g_{\mu \nu} = 8 \pi G \left(T_{\mu \nu}^{(R)} + T_{\mu \nu}^{(m)}\right) ~~,$$ where $$8 \pi G~ T_{\mu \nu}^{(R)} = \frac{1}{2} g_{\mu \nu} f(R) - R_{\mu \nu} f'(R) + \left(\nabla_{\mu}\nabla_{\nu} - g_{\mu \nu} \Box\right) f'(R)~~.$$ Here $f(R) = \frac{\partial f(R)}{\partial R}$, $R_{\mu \nu}$ is the Ricci tensor and $T_{\mu \nu}^{(m)}$ is the energy momentum tensor of matter and $R$ denotes the curvature contribution.
For a spatially flat FRW universe the modified Friedmann equation can be written as $$H^2 = \frac{8\pi G}{3} (\rho_m + \rho_R)$$ and $$2\dot{H} + 3H^2 = - 8\pi G (p_m +p_R)$$ where $$\label{maineq}
\rho_R = \frac{1}{8\pi G} \left[-\frac{1}{2}f(R) + 3(\dot{H} + H^2)f'(R) - 18(4H^2\dot{H} + H\ddot{H}) f''(R) \right] ~~,$$ $$\begin{aligned}
p_R = \frac{1}{8\pi G} &\bigg[\frac{1}{2}f(R) - (\dot{H} + 3H^2)f'(R) + 6(8H^2\dot{H} + 6H\ddot{H} + 4\dot{H}^2
+ \stackrel{...}{H}) f''(R) \nonumber \\
& + 36(\ddot{H} + 4H\dot{H})^2 f'''(R) \bigg] ~~\end{aligned}$$ and $$\label{eqR}
R = 6(\dot{H} + 2H^2)~~.$$ Here the Hubble parameter is $H=\frac{\dot{a}}{a}$ and overdot denotes derivative with respect to cosmic time $t$. We can show that the curvature contribution will have its own equation of state and it can be written as [@f94] $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eos}
\omega_R &= \frac{p_R}{\rho_R} \nonumber \\
&= 1 - \frac{4\big[\dot{H}f'(R) + 3(3H\ddot{H} - 4H^2\dot{H} + 4\dot{H}^2 + \stackrel{...}{H})f''(R) + 18(\ddot{H} + 4H\dot{H})^2 f'''(R)\big]}{\big[f(R) - 6(\dot{H} + H^2)f'(R) + 36(4H^2\dot{H} + H\ddot{H})f''(R)\big]} ~~.\end{aligned}$$ In $f(R)$ gravity theories usually we encounter three types of scale factors for accelerating and inflationary cosmological solutions. We will follow the details of [@f95; @f]. Here we will study phantom, quintessence and deSitter scale factors which are given by $$\label{mGB2}
a=\left\{
\begin{array}{ll} a_0~(t_s - t)^{-h}, ~~~~~~~~~~~~ t\leq t_s,~~~~~ h>0~~~~~~~~~~ \mbox{(phantom)} \\\\
a_0 ~t^h,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ h>0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \mbox{(quintessence)} \\\\
a_0 ~e^{Ht},~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ H=\mbox{constant~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(deSitter)}
\end{array} \right.$$ With the phantom scale factor and eqn.(\[eqR\]) we get $$H = \left[\frac{h}{6(2h+1)}R\right]^{\frac{1}{2}}$$ and also $$\dot{H} = \frac{H^2}{2} ~~.$$ Recent observations constrain the value of $h$ for the phantom scale factor to be $-\infty > h \geq 7.81$ [@obser]. Similarly with the quintessence scale factor and eqn.(\[eqR\]) we get $$\label{quin1}
H = \left[\frac{h}{6(2h-1)}R\right]^{\frac{1}{2}}$$ and also $$\label{quin2}
\dot{H} = -\frac{H^2}{2} ~~.$$ For this quintessence scale factor the value of $h$ is very close to unity [@obser]. For deSitter solution we have $H=$ constant. This scale factor is used describe the early inflationary scenario. For this case we get $$\label{conh}
H = \left(\frac{R}{12}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}} ~~.$$ Now we will try to evaluate the form of $f(R)$ for each of the scale factor mentioned above in the light of the generalized uncertainty principle (GUP). For our purpose we need to solve eqn.(\[maineq\]) and we borrow the energy density from the holographic and agegraphic dark energy models respectively.
Considering the leading order terms of eqn.(\[ent\]) and following the arguments of [@f48; @wei6] we can write the GUP motivated energy density for the holographic DE model as $$\label{hd}
\rho_{\Lambda} = \frac{3n^2 m_p^2}{L^2} + \frac{a m_p}{L^3} + \frac{b}{L^4} \ln(L^2 m_p^2) + \frac{c}{L^4} ~~.$$ Here $n,a,b$ and $c$ are constants and $L$ is the future event horizon. If $a=b=c=0$ we get the usual holographic DE model. Though $n$ is a constant but its value can be constrained from the latest observational data [@f97]. The future event horizon is defined as $$L = a \int_t^{\infty} \frac{d t}{a} ~~.$$ For the phantom scale factor the future event horizon is $$L = a \int_t^{t_s} \frac{d t}{a} = \frac{1}{h+1} \sqrt{\frac{6h(2h+1)}{R}}$$ Putting the value of $L$ in eqn.(\[hd\]) we get the form of energy density as $$\label{rhoh}
\rho_{\Lambda} = \frac{3n^2 m_p^2 (h+1)^2}{6h(2h+1)}R + \frac{a m_p (h+1)^3}{(6h)^{\frac{3}{2}}(2h+1)^{\frac{3}{2}}} R^{\frac{3}{2}} + \frac{(h+1)^4 R^2}{(6h)^2(2h+1)^2}\left[b\ln\left\{\frac{6h(2h+1) m_p^2}{(h+1)^2 R} \right\} + c \right] ~~.$$ Now eqn.(\[maineq\]) can be written in terms of $R$ as $$\begin{aligned}
R^2 f''(R) &- \frac{(h+1)}{2}Rf'(R) + \frac{(2h+1)}{2}f(R) = -\frac{n^2 (h+1)^2}{2h}R -\frac{a}{m_p} \frac{(h+1)^3}{(6h)^{\frac{3}{2}}(2h+1)^{\frac{1}{2}}} R^{\frac{3}{2}} \nonumber \\
&+ \frac{b}{m_p^2} \frac{(h+1)^4}{(6h)^2(2h+1)} R^2 \ln [R] - \frac{b}{m_p^2} \frac{(h+1)^4}{(6h)^2(2h+1)} \ln \left[ \frac{m_p^2 6h(2h+1)}{(h+1)^2}\right] R^2 \nonumber \\
&+ \frac{c}{m_p^2} \frac{(h+1)^4}{(6h)^2(2h+1)} R^2 ~~,\end{aligned}$$ where $m_p^2 = \frac{1}{8\pi G}$. This equation is a nonhomogeneous Euler differential equation and the solution can be written as $$\label{fR1}
f(R) = C_1 R^q + C_2 R^r + \delta R + \alpha R^{\frac{3}{2}} + \beta R^2 + \gamma R^2 \ln [R] ~~,$$ where $$\label{set1}
\left\{\begin{array}{ll}
q = \frac{1}{4} \left[3 + h + \sqrt{h^2 - 10h + 1}~\right] \\\\
r = \frac{1}{4} \left[3 + h - \sqrt{h^2 - 10h + 1}~\right] \\\\
\delta = - \frac{n^2 (h+1)^2}{h^2} \\\\
\alpha = - \frac{1}{m_p} \frac{4a (h+1)^3}{(h+2)(6h)^{\frac{3}{2}} (2h+1)^{\frac{1}{2}}} \\\\
\beta = \frac{1}{m_p^2} \left[- \frac{b~(10+3h-h^2)(h+1)^4}{162~h^2(h+2)(2h+1)} - \frac{b~(h+1)^4}{54~h^2(2h+1)} \ln \left\{ \frac{m_p^2 6~h(2h+1)}{(h+1)^2}\right\} + \frac{c~(h+1)^4}{54~h^2(2h+1)} \right] \\\\
\gamma = \frac{b}{m_p^2}\frac{(h+1)^4}{54~h^2(2h+1)}
\end{array} \right.$$ with $C_{1,2}$ as integration constants whose value can be predicted by the boundary conditions. The boundary conditions being $$f(R) \vert_{R=R_0} =- 2R_0 ~~~~~~~~~~ \text{and} ~~~~~~~~~~ f'(R)\vert_{R=R_0} \sim 0 ~~,$$ where $R=R_0$ is the present value of $R$ which is a small constant. The value of $R_0$ is of the order of $(10^{-33}eV)^2$. If we apply the boundary conditions we get the values of $C_{1,2}$ as $$\begin{aligned}
C_1 =& \frac{R_0^{1-q}}{2(q-r)} \Big[2(2r - \delta + r \delta) - \alpha \sqrt{R_0}~(3 - 2r) - 2\beta R_0~ (2 -r) - \nonumber \\
& 2\gamma R_0 ~(1 + 2 \ln [R_0] - r \ln [R_0]~) \Big] ~~\end{aligned}$$ and $$\begin{aligned}
C_2 =& -\frac{R_0^{1-r}}{2(q-r)} \Big[2(2q - \delta + q \delta) - \alpha \sqrt{R_0}~(3 - 2q) - 2\beta R_0~ (2 -q) - \nonumber \\
& 2\gamma R_0 ~(1 + 2 \ln [R_0] - q \ln [R_0]~) \Big] ~~.\end{aligned}$$ In general the equation of state of eqn.(\[eos\]) will be a function of $H$ and hence time in this case and so it can explain the transition from quintessence ($\omega_R > -1$) to phantom dominated regime ($\omega_R < -1$) as predicted by recent observations [@f100; @f101; @f102]. If we see eqn.(\[fR1\]) we can infer that there is a contribution from $R^{\frac{3}{2}}$. This is interesting from the fact that we can have contributions from fractional powers of $R$. We will discuss this in the later part of this study.
For the quintessence scale factor the future event horizon is at $$\label{lqs}
L = a \int_t^{\infty} \frac{d t}{a} = \frac{1}{h-1} \sqrt{\frac{6h(2h-1)}{R}}$$ with the condition $h>1$. Putting the value of $L$ from eq.(\[lqs\]) in eqn.(\[hd\]) we get the form of energy density as $$\label{rhoq}
\rho_{\Lambda} = \frac{n^2 m_p^2 (h-1)^2}{2h(2h-1)}R + \frac{a m_p (h-1)^3}{(6h)^{\frac{3}{2}}(2h-1)^{\frac{3}{2}}} R^{\frac{3}{2}} + \frac{(h-1)^4 R^2}{(6h)^2(2h-1)^2}\left[b\ln\left\{\frac{6h(2h-1) m_p^2}{(h-1)^2 R} \right\} + c \right] ~~.$$ So for the quintessence scale factor eqn.(\[quin1\] and \[quin2\]) we can rewrite eqn.(\[maineq\]) with eqn.(\[rhoq\]) as $$\begin{aligned}
R^2 f''(R) &+ \frac{(h-1)}{2}Rf'(R) - \frac{(2h-1)}{2}f(R) = \frac{n^2 (h-1)^2}{2h}R +\frac{a}{m_p} \frac{(h-1)^3}{(6h)^{\frac{3}{2}}(2h-1)^{\frac{1}{2}}} R^{\frac{3}{2}} \nonumber \\
&- \frac{b}{m_p^2} \frac{(h-1)^4}{(6h)^2(2h-1)} R^2 \ln [R] + \frac{b}{m_p^2} \frac{(h-1)^4}{(6h)^2(2h-1)} \ln \left[ \frac{m_p^2 6h(2h-1)}{(h-1)^2}\right] R^2 \nonumber \\
&+ \frac{c}{m_p^2} \frac{(h-1)^4}{(6h)^2(2h-1)} R^2 ~~,\end{aligned}$$ where $m_p^2 = \frac{1}{8\pi G}$. Similarly like the phantom case the solution can be written as $$\label{fR2}
f(R) = C_1 R^q + C_2 R^r + \delta R + \alpha R^{\frac{3}{2}} + \beta R^2 + \gamma R^2 \ln [R] ~~.$$ where $$\label{set2}
\left\{\begin{array}{ll}
q = \frac{1}{4} \left[3 - h + \sqrt{h^2 + 10h + 1}~\right] \\\\
r = \frac{1}{4} \left[3 - h - \sqrt{h^2 + 10h + 1}~\right] \\\\
\delta = - \frac{n^2 (h-1)^2}{h^2} \\\\
\alpha = \frac{2a}{3m_p} \frac{(h-1)^3}{h(2-h)(2h-1)^{\frac{1}{2}}} \\\\
\beta = \frac{1}{m_p^2} \left[ \frac{b~(10-3h-h^2)(h-1)^4}{162~h^2(2-h)(2h-1)} + \frac{b~(h-1)^4}{54~h^2(2h-1)} \ln \left\{ \frac{m_p^2 6~h(2h-1)}{(h-1)^2}\right\} + \frac{c~(h-1)^4}{54~h^2(2h-1)} \right] \\\\
\gamma = - \frac{b}{m_p^2}\frac{(h-1)^4}{54~h^2(2h-1)}
\end{array} \right.$$ The boundary conditions will give $$\begin{aligned}
C_1 =& \frac{R_0^{1-q}}{2(q-r)} \Big[2(2r - \delta + r \delta) - \alpha \sqrt{R_0}~(3 - 2r) - 2\beta R_0~ (2 -r) - \nonumber \\
& 2\gamma R_0 ~(1 + 2 \ln [R_0] - r \ln [R_0]~) \Big] ~~\end{aligned}$$ and $$\begin{aligned}
C_2 =& -\frac{R_0^{1-r}}{2(q-r)} \Big[2(2q - \delta + q \delta) - \alpha \sqrt{R_0}~(3 - 2q) - 2\beta R_0~ (2 -q) - \nonumber \\
& 2\gamma R_0 ~(1 + 2 \ln [R_0] - q \ln [R_0]~) \Big] ~~.\end{aligned}$$ For the scale factor in deSitter space $H$ is constant. The future event horizon is located at $$L = a L = a \int_t^{\infty} \frac{d t}{a} = \frac{1}{H} = \sqrt{\frac{12}{R}} ~~,$$ where $H$ is given by eqn.(\[conh\]). So we can write the GUP motivated energy density from eqn.(\[hd\]) as $$\rho_{\Lambda} = \frac{n^2 m_p^2}{4} ~R + \frac{a ~m_p}{12^{\frac{3}{2}}} ~R^{\frac{3}{2}} + \frac{b}{144~ m_p^2}~R^2 \ln \left(\frac{12~m_p^2}{R}\right) + \frac{c}{144~ m_p^2} ~R^2 ~~.$$ So eqn.(\[maineq\]) takes the form $$R f'(R) - 2 f(R) = \frac{4 \rho_{\Lambda}}{m_p^2} ~~.$$ The solution of this equation can be written in the form $$f(R) = -n^2 ~R + C_1~R^2 - \frac{a}{3\sqrt{3}~m_p}~R^{\frac{3}{2}} - \frac{b}{72~m_p^2}~R^2~\left\{\ln \left(\frac{12~m_p^2}{R}\right)\right\}^2 + \frac{c}{36~m_p^2}~R^2~\ln (R) ~~,$$ where $C_1$ is the arbitrary integration constant to be fixed by boundary conditions. The GUP motivated terms in $f(R)$ are important for inflationary scenario. We have instances for the $R^2$ term in literature to explain early time inflation [@sud59] as a curvature driven phenomenon. Here we have a new term $R^{\frac{3}{2}}$ in $f(R)$ which can be important for curvature driven inflation. We will discuss more about this term later in the discussion section.
f(R) from New Agegraphic DE model with GUP {#fr-from-new-agegraphic-de-model-with-gup .unnumbered}
==========================================
With the corrections due to the generalized uncertainty principle to the entropy area relation we can frame the energy density of the new agegraphic DE model [@f48; @wei6] as $$\label{rho2}
\rho_{\Lambda} = \frac{3n^2~m_p^2}{\eta^2} + \frac{a~m_p}{\eta^3} + \frac{b}{\eta^4}~\ln~(\eta^2~m_p^2) + \frac{c}{\eta^4} ~~,$$ where $\eta$ is the conformal time. $a=b=c=0$ will give back the usual new agegraphic DE model. The parameter $n$ is constrained by present observations and its best fit value is around $2.716_{-0.109}^{+0.111}$ with $1\sigma$ uncertainty [@f56]. The numerical factor $3n^2$ was introduced for a parameterization of some uncertainties such as the effect of curved spacetime (as the K$\acute{a}$rolyh$\acute{a}$zy relation considered only the metric quantum fluctuations of Minkowski spacetime), the species of quantum fields in the universe etc.
For the phantom scale factor the conformal time can be evaluated as $$\eta = \int_t^{t_s}~\frac{dt}{a} = \frac{1}{a_0(h+1)} \left[\frac{6h(2h+1)}{R}\right]^{\frac{h+1}{2}} ~~,~~~~~~~~~~~~h>0 ~~.$$ Substituting this in eqn.(\[rho2\]) we get $$\begin{aligned}
\label{rhap}
\rho_{\Lambda} &= \frac{3~n^2~m_p^2 ~a_0^2 (h+1)^2}{(6h)^{h+1}(2h+1)^{h+1}}~R^{h+1} + \frac{a ~m_p ~a_0^3 (h+1)^3}{(6h)^{\frac{3h+3}{2}}(2h+1)^{\frac{3h+3}{2}}}~R^{\frac{3h+3}{2}} + \nonumber \\
& \left[ \frac{b~a_0^4 (h+1)^4}{(6h)^{2h+2}(2h+1)^{2h+2}} ~\ln \left\{\frac{(6h)^{h+1}(2h+1)^{h+1}m_p^2}{a_0^2(h+1)^2}\right\}
+ \frac{c ~a_0^4 (h+1)^4}{(6h)^{2h+2}(2h+1)^{2h+2}} \right]R^{2h+2} \nonumber \\
& - \frac{b~a_0^4 (h+1)^4}{(6h)^{2h+2}(2h+1)^{2h+2}} ~R^{2h+2} ~\ln ~(R^{h+1}) ~~.\end{aligned}$$ Solving the inhomogeneous Euler differential equation (\[maineq\]) with eqn.(\[rhap\]) we get the form of $f(R)$ as $$f(R) = C_1~R^q~ + C_2~R^r~ + \delta ~R^{h+1} + \alpha ~R^{\frac{3}{2}(h+1)} + \beta ~R^{2h+2} + \gamma ~R^{2h+2}~\ln ~R^{h+1} ~~,$$ where $$\label{set3}
\left\{\begin{array}{ll}
q = \frac{1}{4} \left[3 + h + \sqrt{h^2 - 10h + 1}~\right] \\\\
r = \frac{1}{4} \left[3 + h - \sqrt{h^2 - 10h + 1}~\right] \\\\
\delta = - \frac{3n^2 a_0^2 (h+1)^2}{h(6h)^{h+1}(2h+1)^h} \left[\frac{288 + 3360 ~h + 14816~ h^2+31360~h^3 +33408~h^4 +17280~h^5 +3456~h^6 }{288 + 3504~h +16496~h^2 +38768~h^3 +49088~h^4 +33984~h^5 + 12096~h^6 + 1728~h^7}\right] \\\\
\alpha = - \frac{a~a_0^3 (h+1)^3}{m_p~(6h)^{\frac{3h+3}{2}}(2h+1)^{\frac{3h+1}{2}}}\left[\frac{576 +4128~h + 10624~h^2 + 12032~h^3 + 6144~h^4 + 1152~h^5}{288 + 3504~h +16496~h^2 +38768~h^3 +49088~h^4 +33984~h^5 +12096~h^6 + 1728~h^7}\right] \\\\
\beta = \bigg\{\left[\frac{b~ a_0^4 (h+1)^4}{m_p^2 (6h)^{2h+2}(2h+1)^{2h+1}} \ln\left\{\frac{(6h)^{h+1}(2h+1)^{h+1}m_p^2}{a_0^2 (h+1)^2}\right\} + \frac{c ~a_0^4 (h+1)^4}{m_p^2 (6h)^{2h+2}(2h+1)^{2h+1}} \right] \times \\
~~~~~\left[\frac{320+2528~h+6432~h^2+7168~h^3+3616~h^4+672~h^5}{288 + 3504~h +16496~h^2 +38768~h^3 +49088~h^4 +33984~h^5 +12096~h^6 + 1728~h^7}\right]\bigg\} + \\
~~~\left\{\left[\frac{b~ a_0^4 (h+1)^4}{m_p^2 (6h)^{2h+2}(2h+1)^{2h+1}} \right] \left[\frac{192+1696~h+4960~h^2+5920~h^3+3072~h^4+576~h^5}{288 + 3504~h +16496~h^2 +38768~h^3 +49088~h^4 +33984~h^5 +12096~h^6 + 1728~h^7}\right]\right\} \\\\
\gamma = \frac{b~ a_0^4 (h+1)^4}{m_p^2 (6h)^{2h+2}(2h+1)^{2h+1}} \left[\frac{192+1696~h+4960~h^2+5920~h^3+3072~h^4+576~h^5}{288 + 3504~h +16496~h^2 +38768~h^3 +49088~h^4 +33984~h^5 +12096~h^6 + 1728~h^7}\right]~~.
\end{array} \right.$$ The boundary conditions will give $$\begin{aligned}
C_1 =& \frac{R_0^{1-q}}{2(q-r)} \bigg[4r - \alpha(3+3h-2r)~R_0^{\frac{3h+1}{2}} - 2(2\beta +2h\beta - r\beta +\gamma +h\gamma)~R_0^{2h+1} \nonumber \\
& -2\delta (1 + h -2r)~R_0^h - 2\gamma (2+2h-r)R_0^{2h+1}\ln ~[R_0^{h+1}]\bigg]\end{aligned}$$ and $$\begin{aligned}
C_2 =& \frac{R_0^{1-r}}{2(r-q)} \bigg[4q - \alpha(3+3h-2q)~R_0^{\frac{3h+1}{2}} - 2(2\beta +2h\beta - q\beta +\gamma +h\gamma)~R_0^{2h+1} \nonumber \\
& -2\delta (1 + h -2q)~R_0^h - 2\gamma (2+2h-q)R_0^{2h+1}\ln ~[R_0^{h+1}]\bigg]\end{aligned}$$ In general the equation of state of eqn.(\[eos\]) will be a function of $H$ and hence time in this case and so it can explain the transition from quintessence ($\omega_R > -1$) to phantom dominated regime ($\omega_R < -1$) as predicted by recent observations [@f100; @f101; @f102]. For the quintessence scale factor (\[mGB2\]) the conformal time can be evaluated with eqns.(\[quin1\]) and (\[quin2\]) as $$\eta = \int_0^{t}~\frac{dt}{a} = \frac{1}{a_0(1-h)} \left[\frac{6h(2h-1)}{R}\right]^{\frac{1-h}{2}} ~~,~~~~~~~~~~~~\frac{1}{2}<h<1 ~~.$$ For a real finite conformal time it is necessary to have $\frac{1}{2}<h<1$. Substituting this in eqn.(\[rho2\]) we get $$\begin{aligned}
\label{rhaq}
\frac{\rho_{\Lambda}}{m_p^2} &= \frac{3~n^2 ~a_0^2 (1-h)^2}{(6h)^{1-h}(2h-1)^{1-h}}~R^{1-h} + \frac{a ~a_0^3 (1-h)^3}{m_p~(6h)^{\frac{3-3h}{2}}(2h-1)^{\frac{3-3h}{2}}}~R^{\frac{3-3h}{2}} \nonumber \\
& + \frac{ a_0^4 (1-h)^4}{m_p^2~(6h)^{2-2h}(2h-1)^{2-2h}}\left[b~ \ln \left\{\frac{(6h)^{1-h}(2h-1)^{1-h}m_p^2}{a_0^2(1-h)^2}\right\}
+ c \right]R^{2-2h} \nonumber \\
& - \frac{b~a_0^4 (1-h)^4}{m_p^2~(6h)^{2-2h}(2h-1)^{2-2h}} ~R^{2-2h} ~\ln ~(R^{1-h}) ~~.\end{aligned}$$ Solving the inhomogeneous Euler differential equation (\[maineq\]) with eqns.(\[rhaq\]), (\[quin1\]) and (\[quin2\]) we get the form of $f(R)$ as $$f(R) = C_1~R^q~ + C_2~R^r~ + \delta ~R^{1-h} + \alpha ~R^{\frac{3}{2}(1-h)} + \beta ~R^{2-2h} + \gamma ~R^{2-2h}~\ln ~R^{1-h} ~~,$$ where $$\label{set4}
\left\{\begin{array}{ll}
q = \frac{1}{4} \left[3 - h + \sqrt{h^2 + 10h + 1}~\right] \\\\
r = \frac{1}{4} \left[3 - h - \sqrt{h^2 + 10h + 1}~\right] \\\\
\delta = \frac{3n^2 a_0^2 (1-h)^2}{h(6h)^{1-h}(2h-1)^{-h}} \left[\frac{288 - 3360 ~h + 14816~ h^2 - 31360~h^3 +33408~h^4 -17280~h^5 +3456~h^6 }{-288 + 3504~h -16496~h^2 +38768~h^3 -49088~h^4 +33984~h^5 - 12096~h^6 + 1728~h^7}\right] \\\\
\alpha = \frac{a~a_0^3 (1-h)^3}{m_p~(6h)^{\frac{3-3h}{2}}(2h-1)^{\frac{1-3h}{2}}}\left[\frac{-576 +4128~h - 10624~h^2 + 12032~h^3 - 6144~h^4 + 1152~h^5}{-288 + 3504~h -16496~h^2 +38768~h^3 -49088~h^4 +33984~h^5 -12096~h^6 + 1728~h^7}\right] \\\\
\beta = \bigg\{\frac{ a_0^4 (1-h)^4}{m_p^2 (6h)^{2-2h}(2h-1)^{1-2h}}\left[b~ \ln\left\{\frac{(6h)^{1-h}(2h-1)^{1-h}m_p^2}{a_0^2 (1-h)^2}\right\} + c \right] \times \\
~~~~~\left[\frac{-192+1696~h-4960~h^2+5920~h^3-3072~h^4+576~h^5}{-288 + 3504~h -16496~h^2 +38768~h^3 -49088~h^4 +33984~h^5 -12096~h^6 + 1728~h^7}\right]\bigg\} - \\
~~~\left\{\left[\frac{b~ a_0^4 (1-h)^4}{m_p^2 (6h)^{2-2h}(2h-1)^{1-2h}} \right] \left[\frac{320-2528~h+6432~h^2-7168~h^3+3616~h^4-672~h^5}{-288 + 3504~h -16496~h^2 +38768~h^3 -49088~h^4 +33984~h^5 -12096~h^6 + 1728~h^7}\right]\right\} \\\\
\gamma = \frac{-~b~ a_0^4 (1-h)^4}{m_p^2 (6h)^{2-2h}(2h-1)^{1-2h}} \left[\frac{-192 + 1696~h - 4960~h^2 + 5920~h^3 - 3072~h^4 + 576~h^5}{-288 + 3504~h -16496~h^2 +38768~h^3 -49088~h^4 +33984~h^5 -12096~h^6 + 1728~h^7}\right]~~.
\end{array} \right.$$ The boundary conditions $f(R) \vert_{R=R_0} =- 2R_0$ and $f'(R)\vert_{R=R_0} \sim 0$ will give $$\begin{aligned}
C_1 =& \frac{R_0^{1-2h-q}}{2(q-r)} \big[4r~R_0^{2h} - \alpha (3 -3h-2r) ~R_0^{\frac{h+1}{2}} - 2(2\beta -2h\beta - r\beta +\gamma -h\gamma) ~R_0 \nonumber \\
& - 2\delta (1-h-r) ~R_0^h - 2\gamma (2 - 2h-r) ~R_0 ~\ln ~[R_0^{1-h}] \big]\end{aligned}$$ and $$\begin{aligned}
C_2 =& \frac{R_0^{1-2h-r}}{2(r-q)} \big[4q~R_0^{2h} - \alpha (3 -3h-2q) ~R_0^{\frac{h+1}{2}} - 2(2\beta -2h\beta - q\beta +\gamma -h\gamma) ~R_0 \nonumber \\
& - 2\delta (1-h-q) ~R_0^h - 2\gamma (2 - 2h-q) ~R_0 ~\ln ~[R_0^{1-h}] \big] ~~.\end{aligned}$$ For the scale factor $a(t) = a_0~e^{Ht}$ with $H=constant$ (deSitter) we write the conformal time as $$\label{last1}
\eta = \int_0^{\infty} \frac{dt}{a} = \frac{1}{a_0H} = \sqrt{\frac{12}{a_0^2~R}} ~~.$$ Here we have set the upper limit of the integration to $t\rightarrow \infty$ to express $\eta$ in terms of $R$. The relevant modification to the energy density (\[rho2\]) will be $$\label{last2}
\rho_{\Lambda} = \frac{3~n^2~m_p^2}{\eta^2} + \frac{a~m_p}{\eta^3} + \frac{b}{\eta^4} \ln~(\eta^2~m_p^2) + \frac{c}{\eta^4} ~~.$$ The solution of eqn.(\[maineq\]) with (\[last1\]) and (\[last2\]) yields the form of $f(R)$ as $$f(R) = -n~a_0^2~R + C_1~R^2 - \frac{a~a_0^3}{3\sqrt{3}m_p}~R^{\frac{3}{2}} - \frac{b~a_0^4}{72~m_p^2}~R^2~\left[\ln \left(\frac{12~m_p^2}{a_0~R}\right)\right]^2 + \frac{c~a_0^4}{36~m_p^2}~R^2~\ln[R]~~.$$ where $C_1$ is the integration constant to be fixed with boundary conditions. Here also like the holographic DE model we have a new term $R^{\frac{3}{2}}$ in $f(R)$ which can be important for curvature driven inflation.
Discussion {#discussion .unnumbered}
==========
In this study we considered the generalized uncertainty principle motivated forms of the holographic and the new agegraphic DE models to reconstruct the form of $f(R)$ suitable to explain the unification of early time inflation and late time acceleration. The idea that the Heisenberg uncertainty principle could be affected by gravity was given by Mead [@new19]. In the regime when the gravity is strong enough, conventional Heisenberg uncertainty relation is no longer satisfactory (though approximately but perfectly valid in low gravity regimes). Modified commutation relations between position and momenta commonly known as the generalized uncertainty principle (or GUP) were given by candidate theories of quantum gravity like string theory, doubly special relativity and black hole physics with the prediction of a minimum measurable length. Importance of the GUP can also be realized on the basis of simple gedanken experiments without any reference of a particular fundamental theory [@new27; @new28]. So we can think the GUP as a model-independent concept suitable for the study of black hole entropy at least phenomenologically.
According to the holographic principle the number of degrees of freedom of a bounded system should be finite and is related to the area of its boundary. As an application of the principle the upper bound of the entropy of the universe can be obtained. The total energy of a system of size $L$ should not exceed the mass of a black hole of the same size otherwise it would decay into a black hole. The saturation of the inequality means $\rho_{\Lambda} = \frac{3n^2~m_p^2}{L^2}$ where $m_p$ is the reduced Planck Mass ($m_p^{-2} = 8\pi G$). The UV cut-off is related to the vacuum energy and the IR cut-off is related to the large scale of the universe. The holographic dark energy scenario is viable if we set the IR cut-off by the future event horizon and also makes a concrete prediction about the equation of state of the DE [@f14]. On the other hand the new agegraphic DE model is based on the K$\acute{a}$rolyh$\acute{a}$zy relation which considers energy density of quantum fluctuations of the metric and matter in the universe. The energy density of the new agegraphic DE model has the same form as the holographic dark energy but the conformal time takes care of the IR cut-off instead of considering the future event horizon of the universe. The model not only account the observed value of DE in the universe but also predicts an accelerated expansion. Among various theoretical approaches to explain the present cosmic accelerated expansion of the universe only the holographic and the new agegraphic DE model is somehow based on the entropy-area relation. The entropy-area relation on the other hand can have quantum corrections through various approaches of quantum gravity.
As no single theoretical proposal for DE enjoys a pronounced supremacy over the others in terms of having a strong field theoretic support as well as being able to explain all the present observational data. This state of art explores another possibility of whether geometry in its own right could explain the presently observed accelerated expansion. The idea stems from the fact that higher order modifications of the Ricci curvature $R$ along with $R$ in the Einstein-Hilbert action could generate inflation in the very early universe. As the curvature is expected to fall off with the cosmic evolution it is then obvious whether inverse powers of $R$ in the action dominant during the later stages could drive a late time acceleration. In general this alternative theory is coined as $f(R)$ gravity.
In this paper we studied a unified approach with the holographic, new agegraphic and the $f(R)$ DE model to construct the form of $f(R)$ which in general responsible for the curvature driven explanation of the very early inflation along with presently observed late time acceleration. We considered the generalized uncertainty principle in our approach which incorporated the corrections in the entropy area relation which thereby modified the energy densities for the cosmological DE models considered here [^4]. We found that the GUP motivated holographic and new agegraphic $f(R)$ gravity models can behave like phantom or quintessence models in the spatially flat FRW universe. A similar study was also carried out by authors in [@f]. We reproduced all the result and conclusion of [@f] but in addition we also found a distinct term in the form of $f(R)$ which goes as $R^{\frac{3}{2}}$ due to the consideration of the GUP modified energy densities. This is really very interesting if we consider the phenomenological consequence of our study. Although the presence of this term in the action can have its importance for inflation but Capozziello [*et.al.*]{} [@capo1; @capo2] introduced an action with $f(R) \sim R^m$ and showed that it leads to an accelerated expansion, [*i.e.*]{}, a negative value for the deceleration parameter $q$ for $m \approx \frac{3}{2}$ which fit well with SNeIa and WMAP data. Apart from the $R^{\frac{3}{2}}$ term we also found the other possible contributions of $R$ like $R^2$ and $R^2~\ln [R]$ which also have importance in the inflationary scenario. We should also mention here that in the latter case one needs not only quasi-exponential expansion but a metastable (i.e. slowly rolling) one. In $f(R)$ gravity this may occur only if $f(R)$ is close to $R^2$ over some range of $R$ [@refsug].
Acknowledgements {#acknowledgements .unnumbered}
================
The author was partly supported by the Excellence-in-Research Fellowship of IIT Gandhinagar. The author would like to thank an anonymous referee for enlightening comments which immensely helped in improving the manuscript.
[100]{}
Supernova Search Team collaboration, A. G. Riess [*et al.*]{}, Astron. J. [**116**]{} (1998) 1009. Supernova Cosmology Project collaboration, S. Perlmutter [*et al.*]{}, Astrophys. J. [**517**]{} (1999) 565. Boomerang collaboration, P. de Bernardis [*et al.*]{}, Nature 404 (2000) 955. Supernova Cosmology Project collaboration, R. A. Knop [*et al.*]{}, Astrophys. J. 598 (2003) 102.
V. Sahni and A. A. Starobinsky, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D [**9**]{} (2000) 373. T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rept. [**380**]{} (2003) 235. P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra, Rev. Mod. Phys. [**75**]{} (2003) 559. E. J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D [**15**]{} (2006) 1753. V. Sahni and A. A. Starobinsky, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D [**15**]{} (2006) 2105.
P. Ho$\breve{r}$ava and D. Minic, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**85**]{} (2000) 1610. S. D. Thomas, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**89**]{} (2002) 081301. G.’t Hooft, gr-qc/9310026. L. Susskind, J. Math. Phys. [**36**]{} (1995) 6377. W. Fischler and L. Susskind, hep-th/9806039. A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**82**]{} (1999) 4971. M. Li, Phys. Lett. B [**603**]{} (2004) 1. K. Enqvist and M. S. Sloth, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**93**]{} (2004) 221302. Q. -G. Huang and Y. -G. Gong, JCAP [**08**]{} (2004) 006. E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and P. Wang, Phys. Rev. D [**71**]{} (2005) 103504. X. Zhang and F. -Q. Wu, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 043524. B. Guberina, R. Horvat and H. Stefancic, JCAP [**05**]{} (2005) 001. J. P. Beltran Almeida and J. G. Pereira, Phys. Lett. B [**636**]{} (2006) 75. B. Guberina, R. Horvat and H. Nikolic, Phys. Lett. B [**636**]{} (2006) 80. X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D [**74**]{} (2006) 103505. X. Zhang and F. -Q. Wu, Phys. Rev. D [**76**]{} (2007) 023502. L. Xu, JCAP [**09**]{} (2009) 016.
R. K. Kaul and P. Majumdar, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**84**]{} (2000) 5255. A. J. M. Medved, E. C. Vagenas, Phys. Rev. D [**70**]{} (2004) 124021. S. Das, P. Majumdar and R. K. Bhaduri, Class. Quant. Grav. [**19**]{} (2002) 2355. M. Domagala and J. Lewandowski, Class. Quant. Grav. [**21**]{} (2004) 5233. A. Chatterjee, P. Majumdar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 141301. G. A. Camellia, M. Arzano, A. Procaccini, Phys. Rev. D [**70**]{} (2004) 107501. K. A. Meissner, Class. Quant. Grav. [**21**]{} (2004) 5245.
H. Wei, Commun. Theor. Phys. [**52**]{} (2009) 743.
D. H. Lyth and D. Wands, Phys. Lett. B [**524**]{} (2002) 5. D. H. Lyth, C. Ungarelli and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D [**67**]{} (2003) 023503.
R. -G. Cai, Phys. Lett. B [**657**]{} (2007) 228. F. K$\acute{a}$rolyh$\acute{a}$zy, Nuovo Cim. A [**42**]{} (1966) 390. F. K$\acute{a}$rolyh$\acute{a}$zy, A. Frenkel and B. Lukacs, [*On the possibility of observing the eventual breakdown of the superposition principle, in Physics as natural philosophy*]{}, A. Shimony and H. Feschbach [*eds.*]{}, MIT Press, U.S.A. (1982). F. K$\acute{a}$rolyh$\acute{a}$zy, A. Frenkel and B. Lukacs, [*On the possible role of gravity in the reduction of the wave function, in Quantum concepts in space and time*]{}, R. Penrose and C. J. Isham [*eds.*]{}, Clarendon Press, Oxford U.K. (1986). M. Maziashvili, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D [**16**]{} (2007) 1531. M. Maziashvili, Phys. Lett. B [**652**]{} (2007) 165. H. Wei and R. -G. Cai, Phys. Lett. B [**660**]{} (2008) 113. H. Wei and R. -G. Cai, Phys. Lett. B [**663**]{} (2008) 1.
Y. -W. Kim, H. W. Lee, Y. S. Myung and M. -I. Park, Mod. Phys. Lett. A [**23**]{} (2008) 3049. J. -P. Wu, D. -Z. Ma and Y. Ling, Phys. Lett. B [**663**]{} (2008) 152. I. P. Neupane, Phys. Lett. B [**673**]{} (2009) 111. K. Y. Kim, H. W. Lee and Y. S. Myung, Phys. Lett. B [**660**]{} (2008) 118. S. Capozziello, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D [**11**]{} (2002) 483. S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and A. Troisi, Phys. Lett. B [**639**]{} (2006) 135. S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D [**68**]{} (2003) 123512. L. Amendola, D. Polarski and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**98**]{} (2007) 131302. L. Amendola, D. Polarski and S. Tsujikawa, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D [**16**]{} (2007) 1555. W. Hu and I. Sabik, Phys. Rev. D [**76**]{} (2007) 064004. S. Appleby and R. Battye, Phys. Lett. B [**654**]{} (2007) 7. A. A. Starobinsky, JETP Lett. [**86**]{} (2007) 157.
C. A. Mead, Phys. Rev. D [**135**]{} (1964) 849. D. Amati, M. Ciafaloni, G. Veneziano, Phys. Lett. B [**216**]{} (1989) 41. M. Maggiore, Phys. Lett. B [**319**]{} (1993) 83. S. Hossenfelder, M. Bleicher, S. Hofmann, J. Ruppert, S. Scherer and H. Stoecker, Phys. Lett. B [**575**]{} (2003) 85. C. Bambi and F. R. Urban, Class. Quant. Grav. [**25**]{} (2008) 095006. A. Kempf, G. Mangano and R. B. Mann, Phys. Rev. D [**52**]{} (1995) 1108. F. Brau, J. Phys. A [**32**]{} (1999) 7691. J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**88**]{} (2002) 190403. M. Maggiore, Phys. Lett. B [**304**]{} (1993) 65. F. Scardigli, Phys. Lett. B [**452**]{} (1999) 39. J. L. Cortes, J. Gamboa, Phys. Rev. D [**71**]{} (2005) 065015. G. M. Hossain, V. Husain and S. S. Seahra, Class. Quant. Grav. [**27**]{} (2010) 165013. A. F. Ali, S. Das and E. C. Vagenas, Phys. Lett. B [**678**]{} (2009) 497. B. Majumder, Phys. Lett. B [**703**]{} (2011) 402. B. Majumder, arXiv:1212.6591. A. F. Ali, Class. Quantum Grav. [**28**]{} (2011) 065013. K. Karami and M. S. Khaledian, JHEP [**03**]{} (2011) 086.
A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. B [**91**]{} (1980) 99. R. Kerner, Gen. Rel. Gravit. [**14**]{} (1982) 453. J. P. Duruisseau, R. Kerner, Class. Quantum Grav. [**3**]{} (1986) 817. V. Sahni, T. D. Saini, A. A. Starobinsky and U. Alam, JETP Lett. [**77**]{} (2003) 201, \[astro-ph/0201498\]. K. Nozari and T. Azizi, Phys. Lett. B [**680**]{} (2009) 205. S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. [**4**]{} (2007) 115.
R. Rangdee and B. Gumjudpai, arXiv:1210.5550. B. Guberina, R. Horvat and H. Nikolic, JCAP [**0701**]{} (2007) 012.
M. Li, X.-D. Li, S. Wang and X. Zhang, JCAP [**06**]{} (2009) 036. U. Alam, V. Sahni and A. A. Starobinsky, JCAP [**06**]{} (2004) 008. D. Huterer and A. Cooray, Phys. Rev. D [**71**]{} (2005) 023506. Y. Wang and M. Tegmark, Phys. Rev. D [**71**]{} (2005) 103513.
S. Capozziello, S. Carloni and A. Troisi, Recent Res. Dev. Astron. Astrophys. [**1**]{} (2003) 625; astro-ph/0303041. S. Capozziello, V. F. Cardone, S. Carloni and A. Troisi, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D [**12**]{} (2003) 1969.
R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D [**48**]{} (1993) 3427. V. Iyer and R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D [**50**]{} (1994) 846. R. Brustein, D. Gorbonos and M. Hadad, Phys. Rev. D [**79**]{} (2009) 044025. S. A. Appleby, R. A. Battye and A. A. Starobinsky, JCAP [**1006**]{} (2010) 005.
[^1]: [email protected]
[^2]: In [@ali] it has been argued that the holographic theory does not retain its good features by considering minimal length in Quantum Gravity. But here we will try to avoid the issue and hope to present the discussion in some future work.
[^3]: The term $R_{\mu\nu}R^{\mu\nu}$ does not lead to any new kind of inflation different from that produced by the $R^2$ term since the combination $R_{\mu\nu}R^{\mu\nu}- \frac{1}{3}R^2$ does not contribute to the de Sitter solution at all.
[^4]: In the context of modified theories of gravity we should be cautious with the Wald entropy [@bamba8; @bamba9] and not the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. The Wald entropy is defined in terms of quantities on the Killing horizon and it depends on the variation of the Lagrangian density of the modified gravity theory with respect to the Riemann tensor. The Wald entropy is a local quantity and in $f(R)$ gravity it is given by $S_W = \frac{A~f'(R)}{4G}$ [@bamba10]. But here we have just reconstructed $f(R)$ from the energy densities of other DE models so we have not considered the Wald entropy.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: |
A didactic description of the thermodynamic properties of classical spin systems is given in terms of their quantum counterpart in the Hamiltonian limit. Emphasis is on the construction of the relevant Hamiltonian, and the calculation of thermal averages is explicitly done in the case of small systems described, in Hamiltonian field theory, by small matrices. The targeted students are those of a graduate statistical physics course\
[**Résumé.**]{} On donne une description didactique des propriétés thermodynamiques de systèmes de spins classiques en termes de leur équivalent quantique dans la limite hamiltonienne. On insiste sur la construction de l’hamiltonien et le calcul des moyennes thermiques est effectué explicitement dans le cas de systèmes de petite taille, décrits dans la théorie hamiltonienne des champs par des petites matrices. Le public visé est celui d’étudiants suivant un cours avancés en physique statistique.
address: |
$^{(a)}$Groupe M, Laboratoire de Physique des Matériaux, UMR CNRS No 7556,\
Université Henri Poincaré, Nancy 1,\
B.P. 239, F-54506 Vandœuvre les Nancy, France\
$^{(b)}$Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas,\
Centro de Física,\
Carr. Panamericana, km 11, Altos de Pipe,\
Aptdo 21827,\
1020-A Caracas, Venezuela
author:
- 'Bertrand Berche$^{(a,b)}$ and Alexander López$^{(b)}$'
title: ' **Introduction to thermodynamics of spin models in the Hamiltonian limit**'
---
2.37cm
Introduction {#sec:intro}
============
A rather interesting method for studying thermal fluctuations of [*$(d+1)$-dimensional*]{} interacting [*classical*]{} degrees of freedom is provided through the corresponding analysis of quantum fluctuations in a [*$d$-dimensional*]{} system of interacting [*quantum*]{} degrees of freedom. The correspondence is detailed in the remarkable review of Kogut [@Kogut79]. It can be understood as a re-wording of the transfer matrix formalism [@SchultzLiebMattis64] of classical systems in a special limit where the transfer matrix takes a simplified form, the so-called Hamiltonian limit [@FradkinSusskind78]. At the origin of the correspondence, there is the transition amplitude between quantum states in the path integral formulation, = \_[paths]{}iS\[x(t)\] \[eqAmpl\] where the classical action is a functional of $x(t)$, the time integral of a Lagrangian $S=\int_{t_a}^{t_b} L(x,\dot x) d t$. Here we consider the transition amplitude of a point particle (space dimensionality of the quantum system $d=0$) for the sake of simplicity. Equation (\[eqAmpl\]) looks a bit similar to the partition function of [*something*]{} to be specified, = \_[configurations]{}(-E{[d.o.f.]{}}), provided that we change the imaginary argument of the exponential to a real one and we give sense to the degrees of freedom (d.o.f.) and to the sum over their configurations. This transformation is achieved through the definition of an imaginary time, also called Euclidean time, t=-i\[eqImaginaryTime\]in terms of which $L(x,\dot x)=-H(x,p)$, $p=mx'$, $\dot x=dx/dt$ and $x'=dx/d\tau$. The phase factor of equation (\[eqAmpl\]) becomes, with equation (\[eqImaginaryTime\]), iS\[x(t)\]=-1\_[\_a]{}\^[\_b]{} H(x,p)dwhere $H(x,p)=\frac{p^2}{2m}+V(x)$. Equation (\[eqAmpl\]) has a mathematical sense through discretization of the time axis, $t_{i+1}-t_i=\delta=-i\epsilon$, $\epsilon\to 0$, $t_b-t_a=N\delta$, $x_i=x(t_i)$. The action becomes [^1] S\[x()\]\_[i=1]{}\^[N-1]{}(12m ()\^2+V(x\_i)) and the transition amplitude eventually reads as the partition function of a set of $N$ classical d.o.f. $\{x_i\}$ on a 1-dimensional lattice &=& (\_i dx\_i) (-\^[-1]{} \_[i]{} H{ x\_i})\
[P.F.]{} &=& \_[{x\_i}]{}(-\_i H{x\_i}). \[eq-correspondence\] $H\{x_i\}$ is a classical energy density depending on the set of values taken by the d.o.f., ($-\infty<x_i<+\infty$ if there is no restriction specified in the original quantum problem) and leads after summation to the energy of a configuration appearing in the Boltzmann weight. The role of $\beta$ (thermal fluctuations) is played by $\hbar^{-1}$ (quantum fluctuations). The classical limit $\hbar \to 0$ where quantum fluctuations are suppressed corresponds to $\beta\to\infty$ in the classical system, i.e. suppression of thermal fluctuations. The correspondence (\[eq-correspondence\]) is more generally valid than in the simple case of a point particle. To the statistical physics problem of classical degrees of freedom living in $d+1$ space dimensions, there corresponds a quantum problem in $d$ dimensions where the fluctuations result from competition between non commutating variables. The partition function of the former problem involves quantum transitions between multi-particle states in the latter formulation and the Hamiltonian limit is the simplest formulation of the quantum problem when only survive transitions between single-particle quantum states.
This approach deserves some attention and might be taught in graduate statistical physics courses. In the following, we remind how the thermodynamic properties of a classical system might be obtained from their quantum counterpart, then we apply the technique to an approximate determination of the critical properties of two-dimensional classical spin models, namely the Ising model and the $3-$ and $4-$state Potts models.
Thermodynamics
==============
In the quantum version of the problem, we may define a time evolution operator in terms of which the Feynman kernel is K( x\_b,t\_b| x\_a,t\_a)&=& x\_b| (- i (t\_b-t\_a))| x\_a\
&=& x\_b|| x\_[N-1]{}d x\_[N-1]{} x\_[N-1]{}|| x\_[N-2]{} d x\_[N-2]{} x\_[N-2]{}|…\
&&…d x\_2 x\_2|| x\_[1]{} d x\_[1]{} x\_1|| x\_[a]{}\
&=& x\_b|\^N| x\_a, where $\mat{T}$ is the infinitesimal time evolution operator which, in the Euclidean time, becomes the transfer matrix $\mat{T}=\exp(-\epsilon\mat{H}/\hbar)$, $\delta=-i\epsilon$. $N\epsilon$ is the length of the system in the supplementary time direction (see Fig. \[Fig0\]). Summing over initial states, when periodic boundary conditions in the time direction are imposed, $ x_b= x_a= x_0$, we get the partition function from Z=d x\_0K( x\_0,-iN| x\_0,0)=\^N. The thermodynamic limit $N\to\infty$ ensures projection onto the [*ground state*]{}, \^N&=&t\_0\^N |0t\_0\^N0|t\_0>t\_1>… The partition function is thus determined by the largest eigenvalue $t_0$ of the transfer matrix, Zt\_0\^N=\^[-NE\_0/]{}, where $E_0$ is the ground state energy of the quantum Hamiltonian $\mat{H}$. The free energy density (i.e. per time slice) follows f=-\_[N]{}(N)\^[-1]{}ZE\_0.
\[th\] =7.0cm
-2.5cm
The (time) correlation function of some local quantities $\phi_{x}$ depending on the classical d.o.f. $x$, $\<\phi_{ x_i}\phi_{ x_{i+j}}\>$, is expressed in terms of the transfer matrix through
\_[ x\_i]{}\_[ x\_[i+j]{}]{}&=&\_[N]{} Z\^[-1]{}\_[{ x\_i}]{}\_[ x\_i]{}\_[ x\_[i+j]{}]{} \^[-E{ x\_i}]{}\
&=&\_[N]{}Z\^[-1]{} x\_0|| x\_[N-1]{}d x\_[N-1]{} x\_[N-1]{}| …\
&& …T| x\_[i+j]{}\_[ x\_[i+j]{}]{}d x\_[i+j]{} x\_[i+j]{}|… T| x\_[i]{}\_[ x\_i]{}d x\_[i]{} x\_[i]{}|…\
&&… T| x\_[1]{}d x\_[1]{} x\_1|| x\_[0]{}\
&=&\_[N]{} ,\[eq-11\] where diagonal operators in the $\{| x_k\>\}$ basis have been introduced, =d x\_k | x\_k\_[ x\_k]{} x\_k|.
Using the eigenstates of the transfer matrix, the correlation function (\[eq-11\]) becomes \_[ x\_i]{}\_[ x\_[i+j]{}]{}=|0||0|\^2+\_[= 0]{} |0|||\^2 ()\^j. The connected part of the correlation function, $G_\phi(j)$, is obtained after subtraction of the ground state expectation value, and in the thermodynamic limit it is dominated by the first eigenstate $|{\beta_\phi}\>$ such that the matrix element of $\hat{\bphi}$ between this state and the ground state does not vanish, G\_(j)|0||[\_]{}|\^2 ()\^j= |0||[\_]{}|\^2 \^[-j\^[-1]{}(E\_-E\_0)]{}. The matrix element in prefactor measures the average of the field squared, =|0||[\_]{}|, \[eq-elmat\]and the exponential decay along the time direction allows to define the correlation length in terms of an inverse gap ($\hbar =1$), =E\_-E\_0=[gap]{}\_.
A challenging problem in critical phenomena is the identification of the universality class of a given model. Due to scaling relations among critical exponents, the knowledge of two of them determines the whole set of exponents (see table \[tabNomenclatura\]). From finite size-scaling (FSS) behaviour of the critical densities [@Barber83], we expect power law behaviours of local quantities in terms of the finite size $L$ in the space direction, &&\~L\^[-x\_]{},\[eq-e\]\
&& \~L\^[-x\_]{}.\[eq-m\] These relations may be taken as definitions of the scaling dimensions of the energy and order parameter density, $x_\epsilon=(1-\alpha)/\nu$ and $x_\sigma=\beta/\nu$. The commonly accepted notation for the critical exponents is reminded in table \[tabNomenclatura\].
[llllll]{} Quantity & leading singularity & condition & scaling relation\
Specific heat & $C(T)\sim |T-T_c|^{-\alpha}$ & $h=0$ & $\frac {1-\alpha}{\nu}=x_\epsilon$\
Magnetization & $M(T)\sim |T-T_c|^{\beta}$ & $h=0,\ T<T_c$ & $\beta/\nu=x_\sigma$\
Susceptibility & $\chi(T)\sim |T-T_c|^{-\gamma}$ & $h=0$ & $\gamma/\nu=2-2x_\sigma$\
Critical isotherm & $M(h)\sim |h|^{1/\delta}$ & $T=T_c$ & $\delta = \frac{d-x_\sigma}{x_\sigma}$\
Correlation length & $\xi(T)\sim |T-T_c|^{-\nu}$ & $h=0$ & $\nu=(d-x_\epsilon)^{-1}$\
Correlation function & $G(r)\sim r^{-(d-2+\eta)}$ & $h=0,\ T=T_c$ & $\eta=2-d+2x$\
Imagine that we consider a more general quantum problem in $d-1$-space dimensions. The classical counterpart is defined in $d$-dimensions (space [*and*]{} time) and the susceptibility for example follows from the integration of the correlation function over these $d$ dimensions. Let us write schematically what happens in the case of a translation invariant (in $d-1$ dimensions) matrix element, G\_([time]{})=|0||[\_]{}|\^2 \^[-[gap]{}\_]{},\[eq-corr\] &=&\_[[space]{}]{}G\_([time]{}) d \
&& L\^[d-1]{} |0||[\_]{}|\^2 . \[eq-chi\] The matrix element $|\<0|\hat{\bphi}|{\beta_\phi}\>|$ should scale like $L^{-x_\phi}$ (see e.g. equations (\[eq-e\]) and (\[eq-m\])), hence relation (\[eq-chi\]) requires that the gap scales according to ${\tt gap}_\phi\sim L^{-1}$ in order to restore the usual scaling of the susceptibility $\chi\sim L^{\gamma/\nu}$ with $\gamma/\nu=2-\eta=d-2x_\phi$ (see table \[tabNomenclatura\]). Note that the gap being an inverse correlation length, its scaling inversely proportional to the typical linear size of the system logically means that the correlation length at criticality is locked at that size.
The scaling of the gap is more constrained in $2d$ where rather powerful techniques apply. Conformal invariance indeed provides quite efficient methods for the determination of critical exponents of two-dimensional critical systems [@Cardy86]. The cylinder geometry is relevant in the study of quantum chains, since such a chain with periodic boundary conditions in the space direction just corresponds to an infinitely long classical cylinder ($1+1$ dimensions) of complex coordinates $w={\tt time}+i\times{\tt space}$ (here, Euclidean time is assumed). This former geometry follows from the infinite two-dimensional plane $z=r\e^{i\theta}$ through the standard logarithmic mapping $w(z)=\frac L{2\pi}\ln z$ and, at the critical point, the correlation functions transform according to conformal covariance, leading along the cylinder to [@Cardy84] G\_([time]{})=()\^[2x\_]{} \^[-x\_]{}.\[eqCorrConf\] From comparison with equation (\[eq-corr\]), the critical correlation length amplitude appears universal and its value related to the corresponding critical exponent through the simple relation \_=x\_.\[eq-gap\]The matrix elements are also predicted by conformal invariance and follow from equation (\[eqCorrConf\]), |0|||=()\^[x\_]{}.
A prescription before using any conformal invariance result concerns the scaling of the whole spectrum. Multiplying the Hamiltonian by an arbitrary number of course changes the scale of the spectrum. Gap scaling from equation (\[eq-gap\]) requires to fix the normalization in such a way that the sound velocity is unity [@GehlenEtAl85]. The sound velocity might be defined in the long-wavelength limit, ${\tt sound\ velocity}=\Delta E/\Delta k$, where $\Delta E$ is for instance measured by gaps in the bottom of the spectrum and $\Delta k=2\pi/L$ is given by the quantization step of wave vectors.
Quantum Ising chain
===================
The two-dimensional Ising model is often used as the paradigmatic illustration of second-order phase transitions. It is one of the most simple non trivial models and in the following we will show how its quantum counterpart, the quantum Ising chain in a transverse field, is built.
The Hamiltonian limit
---------------------
Let us first consider a ladder of classical Ising spins ${s}_{i,j}=\pm 1$, $-\infty < i< +\infty$, and $j=1,2$ (see figure \[Fig1\]). The nearest neighbour interactions are denoted as $K_s=\beta J_s$ in the space ($j$) direction and $K_t=\beta J_t$ in the time ($i$) direction.
\[th\] =7.5cm
-2cm
The energy of a configuration is a sum over time slices, -E{[s]{}\_[i,j]{}}=\_i(K\_s[s]{}\_[i,1]{}[s]{}\_[i,2]{}+K\_t( [s]{}\_[i,1]{}[s]{}\_[i+1,1]{}+[s]{}\_[i,2]{}[s]{}\_[i+1,2]{})), and the partition function reads as Z&=&\_[{[s]{}\_[i,j]{}}]{}\_i \^[K\_s[s]{}\_[i,1]{}[s]{}\_[i,2]{}+K\_t( [s]{}\_[i,1]{}[s]{}\_[i+1,1]{}+[s]{}\_[i,2]{}[s]{}\_[i+1,2]{})]{} =\_[{[s]{}\_[i,j]{}}]{}\_i T\_[i,i+1]{}, where $T_{i,i+1}$ is an element of some transfer matrix between row states $|\{\sigma_j\}\>=|s_{i,1},s_{i,2}\>$ and $|\{{\sigma'}_j\}\>=|s_{i+1,1},s_{i+1,2}\>$ at rows $i$ and $i+1$ (see figure \[Fig1\]), T\_[i,i+1]{}={’\_j}||{\_j}. $\mat{T}$ is a $4\times 4$ matrix, since the two spins $\sigma_1,\sigma_2$ have four different configurations. The space coupling term is diagonal, $\delta_{\{\sigma_j\},\{\sigma'_j\}}\times\exp(K_s\sigma_{1}\sigma_{2})$,
[c|c]{}
(0,0)(0.5,0.5) (0.5,0)(0,0.5) (-0.07,0.0)[$\sigma'_1,\sigma'_2$]{} (0.58,0.47)[$\sigma_1,\sigma_2$]{}
&
[cccc]{} |, & |, & |, & |,\
\
[c]{} ,|\
,|\
,|\
,|
& (
[cccc]{} \^[K\_s]{} & 0 & 0 & 0\
0 & \^[-K\_s]{} & 0 & 0\
0 & 0 & \^[-K\_s]{} & 0\
0 & 0 & 0 &\^[K\_s]{}
),\
\[eqSpaceMatrix\] while a non-diagonal contribution due to possible spin flips in the time direction, $\exp[K_t(\sigma_{1}\sigma'_{1}+\sigma_{2}\sigma'_{2})]$, leads to the following matrix
[c|c]{}
(0,0)(0.5,0.5) (0.5,0)(0,0.5) (-0.07,0.0)[$\sigma'_1,\sigma'_2$]{} (0.58,0.47)[$\sigma_1,\sigma_2$]{}
&
[cccc]{} |, & |, & |, & |,\
\
[c]{} ,|\
,|\
,|\
,|
& (
[cccc]{} \^[2K\_t]{} & 1 & 1 & \^[-2K\_t]{}\
1 & \^[2K\_t]{} & \^[-2K\_t]{} & 1\
1 & \^[-2K\_t]{} & \^[2K\_t]{} & 1\
\^[-2K\_t]{} & 1 & 1 &\^[2K\_t]{}
).\
\[eqTimeMatrix\] The transfer matrix $\mat{T}$ should be identified through its matrix elements. For the diagonal term, we introduce [*diagonal operators*]{} in the $|\{\sigma_j\}\>$ basis, namely \_z(1)=\_[\_1,\_2]{} |\_1,\_2\_1\_1,\_2|, \[\_z(1)\]= (
[cc]{}1 & 0\
0 & -1
)\_1 (
[cc]{}1 & 0\
0 & 1
)\_2 , \_z(2)=\_[\_1,\_2]{} |\_1,\_2\_2\_1,\_2|, \[\_z(2)\]= (
[cc]{}1 & 0\
0 & 1
)\_1 (
[cc]{}1 & 0\
0 & -1
)\_2 , where $(\mat{1})_j$ and $(\hat{\bsigma}_z)_j$ represent the $2\times 2$ identity or Pauli matrix acting only on variables $\sigma_j$ at site $j$. The matrix in equation (\[eqSpaceMatrix\]) is identified to that of the operator (K\_s\_z(1)\_z(2)). For the flipping term, we introduce [*transition operators*]{} \_x(1) |\_1,\_2=|-\_1,\_2, \[\_x(1)\]= (
[cc]{}0 & 1\
1 & 0
)\_1 (
[cc]{}1 & 0\
0 & 1
)\_2 , \_x(2) |\_1,\_2=|\_1,-\_2, \[\_x(2)\]= (
[cc]{}1 & 0\
0 & 1
)\_1 (
[cc]{}0 & 1\
1 & 0
)\_2 , and since $\hat{\bsigma}^2_x(j)=\mat{1}$, we have, for any value of $K_t^\star$, the useful identity =K\_t\^+ \_x(j)K\_t\^, \[eqCoshSinh\] so that the matrix in equation (\[eqTimeMatrix\]) is identified to that of the operator $\e^{K_t^\star(\hat{\bsigma}_x(1)+\hat{\bsigma}_x(2))}$, (
[cccc]{} \^2 K\_t\^& K\_t\^K\_t\^ & K\_t\^K\_t\^& \^2 K\_t\^\
K\_t\^K\_t\^& \^2 K\_t\^ & \^2 K\_t\^& K\_t\^K\_t\^\
K\_t\^K\_t\^& \^2 K\_t\^ & \^2 K\_t\^& K\_t\^K\_t\^\
\^2 K\_t\^& K\_t\^K\_t\^ & K\_t\^K\_t\^&\^2 K\_t\^
), \[eqTimeMatrixStar\] (up to a prefactor which only shifts the free energy by a constant) provided that we demand K\_t\^=\^[-2K\_t]{}.This relation is equivalent to the usual duality relation 2K\_t2K\_t\^=1.\[eq-duality\]
The transfer matrix eventually follows (we use $\e^{{\bf A}+{\bf B}}
=\e^{\bf A}\e^{\bf B}\e^{-[{\bf A},{\bf B}]/2}\dots$ and already take into account the simplification due to the extreme anisotropic limit which eliminates all correction terms) =(K\_s\_z(1)\_z(2)) (K\_t\^(\_x(1)+\_x(2)). The multiple spin flip terms appear in the expansion of the exponential through product of terms like in equation (\[eqCoshSinh\]). The generalization to a lattice of width $L$ in the space direction (we choose now for the rest of the paper periodic boundary conditions $\hat{\bsigma}_{x,z}(L+1)=\hat{\bsigma}_{x,z}(1)$ in space direction) is straightforward, summing over $j=1,L$, =(K\_s\_[j=1]{}\^L\_z(j) \_z(j+1)) (K\_t\^\_[j=1]{}\^L\_x(j)). \[eqTITF\] The transfer matrix has a complicated structure, since arbitrary large numbers of single spin transitions may simultaneously occur and the matrix representation of $\mat T$ is expected to be dense. It may be considerably simplified in the extreme anisotropic limit also called Hamiltonian limit, since then only single spin transitions survive and $\mat H$ is a sparser matrix. Remember that the relation between the transfer matrix and the Hamiltonian involves the lattice spacing $\epsilon$ in the time direction which tends to zero, $\mat{T}=\exp(-\epsilon\mat{H})=\mat{1}-\epsilon\mat{H}+O(\epsilon^2)$. A simple limit of $\mat{T}$ in equation (\[eqTITF\]) is obtained when $K_s\to 0$, $K_t\to\infty$ (or $K_t^\star\to 0$), with $K_s/K_t^\star=\lambda=O(1)$, and in order to avoid unnecessary constants, we may set $\epsilon=2K_t^\star$ [^2] to get =-12\_[j=1]{}\^L\_z(j) \_z(j+1)) -12\_[j=1]{}\^L \_x(j). \[eqHITF\] The critical line of the two-dimensional anisotropic classical system, obtained through duality i.e. when the relation $\sinh 2K_s\sinh 2K_t=1$ is fulfilled, is equivalent in the extreme anisotropic limit to $2K_s(2K_t^\star)^{-1}=
\lambda_c=1$ when equation (\[eq-duality\]) is also used. Fluctuations in the ground state structure have their origin in the competition between two non-commuting terms in the Hamiltonian. In expression (\[eqHITF\]), the term $-\lambda\hat{\bsigma}_z(j)\hat{\bsigma}_z(j+1)$ acts like a ferromagnetic interaction which reinforces order in the $z$-direction (order parameter) in the chain, while $\hat{\bsigma}_x(j)$ appears as a disordering flipping term. When $\lambda>1$, the ordering term dominates and we expect ferromagnetic $z$-order in the ground state, while the disordered phase corresponds to a dominant role of the flipping term when $\lambda<1$.
The symmetries of the model
---------------------------
The classical model exhibits the $Z_2$ symmetry (invariance under global change $+1\longleftrightarrow -1$ on each site). In the quantum case we expect a similar property [^3] $|\uparrow,\downarrow,\uparrow,\dots,\uparrow\>_z \longleftrightarrow
|\downarrow,\uparrow,\downarrow,\dots,\downarrow\>_z$. This property has an algebraic manifestation through the commutator \[,\]=0,=\_[j=1]{}\^L\_x(j). The eigenstates of $\mat{H}$ may then be classified according to their parity, $P=\pm 1$, $\mat{P}|{\tt even\ state}\>=+1|{\tt even\ state}\>$ and $\mat{P}|{\tt odd\ state}\>=-1|{\tt odd\ state}\>$ and an obvious consequence is that $\mat{H}$ has vanishing matrix elements between states of different parities. More generally, for any [*even*]{} operator $\mat E$ such that $\mat E\mat{P}=\mat{P}\mat E$, the only possibly non vanishing matrix elements of $\mat E$ are between states of the same parity while [*odd*]{} operators satisfying $\mat O\mat{P}=-\mat{P}\mat O$ have surviving matrix elements between states of opposite parities. The ground state of the system is expected to be even (it is of the symmetry of the Hamiltonian itself), so that a measure of local order in the system is given in agreement with equation (\[eq-elmat\]) by =||\_z(j) |[Gnd]{}|.A similar definition of the energy density may be given by inserting terms appearing into the Hamiltonian inside states of the same parity, e.g. = ||\_x(j)|[Gnd]{}|.Matrix elements of $\hat{\bsigma}_z(j)\hat{\bsigma}_z(j+1)$ might have been chosen as well. The reason for being mainly interested in the bottom of the spectrum (see figure \[Fig2\]) lies in the fact that the quantum phase transition takes place at zero temperature. Together with the eigenstates already mentioned, we define the state $|{\tt sound\ velocity}\>$ and the corresponding relation which fixes the value of the sound velocity, E\_[v\_s]{}-E\_[Order]{}=v\_s.If the normalization is not properly chosen, or if the sound velocity is not known, equation (\[eq-gap\]) should be replaced by \_=v\_s x\_and $v_s$ obtained by the equation above. In the case of the quantum Ising model, the Hamiltonian (\[eqHITF\]) is conveniently normalized and $v_s=1$ [@Pfeuty70].
\[th\]
-6cm
Small Chains
------------
A quantum chain of length $L$ corresponds to an infinitely long ladder or strip of classical spins $s_{i,j}$. In the case of a chain of 2 spins with periodic boundary conditions (the classical counterpart is thus a cylinder), the Hamiltonian may be written -2=\_z(1) \_z(2)+\_z(2) \_z(1)+ \_x(1)+ \_x(2). The construction of the matrix of $\mat H$ is easy, = (
[cccc]{} 2& 1 & 1 & 0\
1 & -2& 0 & 1\
1 & 0 & -2& 1\
0 & 1 & 1 & 2
)
[c]{} |,\_z\
|,\_z\
|,\_z\
|,\_z
\[eqMatrixL2\] but it is not written here in the simplest way. Due to the parity property of $\mat{H}$, it is easier to write the $4\times 4$ matrix in the basis of $\hat{\bsigma}_x$-eigenstates, where it is block diagonal. In [*the basis $\{|\uparrow,\uparrow\>_x , |\downarrow,\downarrow\>_x ,
|\uparrow,\downarrow\>_x ,
|\downarrow,\uparrow\>_x \}$*]{}, we have
= (
[c|c]{}
[cc]{} 2& 2\
2& -2\
&\
&
[cc]{} 0& 2\
2& 0
)
[c]{} |,\_x\
|,\_x\
|,\_x\
|,\_x
\[eqMatrixL2\] In the even sector at the critical coupling $\lambda_c=1$, the eigenvalues of $\mat H$ are $E_{\tt Gnd}=-\sqrt{2}$ and $E_{\tt Energy}=+\sqrt{2}$. The ground state $|{\tt Gnd}\>=a_{\tt Gnd}^{\uparrow\uparrow}|\uparrow,\uparrow\>_x
+a_{\tt Gnd}^{\downarrow\downarrow}|\downarrow,\downarrow\>_x$ has normalized components $a_{\tt Gnd}^{\uparrow\uparrow}=0.924$ and $a_{\tt Gnd}^{\downarrow\downarrow}=0.383$ while the [*energy*]{} excited state is given by $|{\tt Energy}\>=a_{\tt Energy}^{\uparrow\uparrow}|\uparrow,\uparrow\>_x
+a_{\tt Energy}^{\downarrow\downarrow}|\downarrow,\downarrow\>_x$ with $a_{\tt Energy}^{\uparrow\uparrow}=0.383$ and $a_{\tt Energy}^{\downarrow\downarrow}=-0.924$. The energy matrix element follows, &=& ||\_x(1)|[Gnd]{}|\
&=&|a\_[Energy]{}\^a\_[Gnd]{}\^ -a\_[Energy]{}\^a\_[Gnd]{}\^|\
&=&0.707.In the odd sector, the lowest eigenvalue is $E_{\tt Order}=- 1$ and the corresponding eigenvector $|{\tt Order}\>=a_{\tt Order}^{\uparrow\downarrow}|\uparrow,\downarrow\>_x
+a_{\tt Order}^{\downarrow\uparrow}|\downarrow,\uparrow\>_x$ has components $a_{\tt Order}^{\uparrow\downarrow}
=a_{\tt Order}^{\downarrow\uparrow}=0.707$. The order parameter matrix element follows, &=& ||\_z(1)|[Gnd]{}|\
&=&|a\_[Order]{}\^ a\_[Gnd]{}\^+a\_[Order]{}\^ a\_[Gnd]{}\^|\
&=&0.924.In the case of a chain of 3 spins with periodic boundary conditions, we have in the basis of $\sigma_x$ eigenstates = (
[cccc|ccccc]{} 3 & & & &\
& -1 & & &\
& & -1 & &\
& & & -1\
&&&& -3 & & & &\
&&&& & 1 & & &\
&&&& & & 1 & &\
&&&& & & & 1
)
[c]{} |,,\_x\
|,,\_x\
|,,\_x\
|,,\_x\
|,,\_x\
|,,\_x\
|,,\_x\
|,,\_x
\[eqMatrixL3\]
The relevant energy levels and corresponding matrix elements for three small sizes are collected in table \[tab1\]. Use will be made of these results to get approximate values of the critical exponents in the discussion in section \[sec-dissc\].
[llllcc]{} $L$ & $\phantom -E_{\tt Gnd}$ & $\phantom -E_{\tt Energy}$ & $\phantom -E_{\tt Order}$ & $\<{\tt Energy\ density}\> $ & $\<{\tt Order\ parameter}\> $\
$2$ & $-1.414$ & $+1.414$ & $-1.000$ & $0.707$ & $0.924$\
$3$ & $-2.000$ & $\phantom + 0.000$ & $-1.732$ & $0.577$ & $0.880$\
$4$ & $-2.613$ & $-1.082$ & $-2.414$ & $0.462$ & $0.848$\
Quantum Potts chain
===================
The Potts model generalizes the Ising model. The sites are occupied by Potts variables (abusively called spins) with $q$ different states, $n_{i,j}=0,1,\dots q-1$, and bonds between nearest neighbour sites may have two different energy levels, depending on the relative states of the site variables, e.g. $-J(q\delta_{n,n'}-1)$.
Hamiltonian limit
-----------------
We follow the same steps as in the case of the Ising model [@SolyomPfeuty81; @Hamer81]. The energy of a configuration is written as a sum over time slices, -E{n\_[i,j]{}}=\_i,\[eq-enPotts\] where the fact that interactions are limited to nearest neighbours allows a factorized partition function $Z=\Tr_{\{n_{i,j}\}}\prod_i T_{i,i+1}$ with matrix elements between row states $|\{\nu_j\}\>=|n_{i,1},n_{i,2},\dots n_{i,L}\>$ and $|\{{\nu'}_j\}\>=|n_{i+1,1},n_{i+1,2},\dots n_{i+1,L}\>$ at time indexes $i$ and $i+1$, T\_[i,i+1]{}={[’]{}\_j}||{\_j}. Now $\mat{T}$ is a $q^{L}\times q^{L}$ matrix (each of the $L$ spins $n_{i,j}$ have $q$ different possible states). As in the case of the Ising model, the space coupling term is diagonal, $\delta_{\{\nu_j\},\{{\nu'}_j\}}
\times\exp(qK_s\sum_k(\delta_{n_{i,k},n_{i,k+1}}-1))$. Its description in $\mat T$ requires the introduction of a combination of diagonal operators in the basis $|\{\nu_j\}\>$, the matrix element of which reproduces the Kronecker delta. For that purpose, we define state vector $|\nu_1\>\otimes |\nu_2\>\otimes\dots\otimes
|\nu_L\>\equiv |\nu_1,\nu_2,\dots,\nu_L\>$ and the corresponding diagonal operators $\mat {C}_k$ and $\mat{C}^\dagger_k$ such that (in this section, we stay close to the notations of Ref. [@Turban89]) \_k|\_1,\_2,…,\_k,…,\_L&&\^[2i\_k/q]{} |\_1,\_2,…,\_k,…,\_L,\
\^\_k|\_1,\_2,…,\_k,…,\_L&&\^[-2i\_k/q]{} |\_1,\_2,…,\_k,…,\_L.Due to the property $$\frac 1q\sum_{p=0}^{q-1}\e^{-2ip\pi(\nu_k-\nu_l)/q}=\delta_{\nu_k,\nu_l}$$ we may write the Kronecker delta as the diagonal matrix element \_[\_k,\_l]{}={\_j}|1q\_[p=0]{}\^[q-1]{}(\_k\^ \_l)\^p|{\_j}. and thus the space contribution to the transfer matrix follows (K\_s\_[j=1]{}\^L \_[p=1]{}\^[q-1]{}(\_j\^ \_[j+1]{})\^p ) where the term $p=0$ is subtracted, since it compensates the $-1$ in the definition of the pair energy in equation (\[eq-enPotts\]). For the time contribution, it is necessary to introduce flipping operators and we define \_k|\_1,\_2,…,\_k,…, \_L&& |\_1,\_2,…,\_[k]{}+1,…,\_L,\
\^\_k|\_1,\_2,…,\_k,…,\_L&& |\_1,\_2,…,\_[k]{}-1,…,\_L, where periodicity in space state is assumed, $|\nu+q\>=|\nu\>$. The matrix representation of these operators is the following =11…(
[ccccc]{} 1 & 0 & 0& …& 0\
0 & \^[2i/q]{} & 0&…& 0\
& 0 & \^[4i/q]{} &&\
0& & && 0\
0&0&…& 0& \^[2i(q-1)/q]{}
)\_j …1, =11…(
[ccccc]{} 0 & 0 & …&0& 1\
1 & 0 & …& 0& 0\
0& 1 & & &\
&&1&0&0\
0&…&0& 1& 0
)\_j …1. They commute on different sites and obey the following algebra on a given site $\mat{R}_j\mat{C}_j=\e^{-2i\pi/q}\mat{C}_j\mat{R}_j$, $\mat{R}^\dagger_j\mat{C}_j=\e^{2i\pi/q}\mat{C}_j\mat{R}^\dagger_j$, $\mat{R}_j\mat{C}^\dagger_j=\e^{2i\pi/q}\mat{C}^\dagger_j\mat{R}_j$, $\mat{R}^\dagger_j\mat{C}^\dagger_j=
\e^{-2i\pi/q}\mat{C}^\dagger_j\mat{R}^\dagger_j$, $\mat{C}_j^q=
\mat{R}_j^q=\mat{1}$. Temporarily forgetting about the site index, diagonalization of $\mat{R}$ leads to $$\mat{R}|r\>=\e^{2ir\pi/q}|r\>,\quad |r\>=
q^{-1/2}\sum_{\nu=0}^{q-1}\e^{-(2ir\pi/q)\nu}
|\nu\>.$$ It follows that the operator $\hat{\bTheta}\equiv
\frac 1q\sum_{p=0}^{q-1}\mat {R}^p$ has the property $\hat{\bTheta}|r\>=\delta_{r,0}|r\>$ (it is equal the projector on the “zero eigenstate” of $\mat R$, $\hat{\bTheta}=|r=0\>\<r=0|$, and so $\<\{{\nu'}_j\}|\hat{\bTheta}|\{\nu_j\}\>=1/q$ for any pair of states $|\{\nu_j\}\>$ and $|\{{\nu'}_j\}\>$) which enables to write (qK\_t\^\_j)=1+\_j (\^[qK\_t\^]{}-1) for arbitrary value of $K_t^\star$. The time contributions, $\e^{K_t(q\delta_{\nu_j,{\nu'}_j}-1)}$, which can take values $\e^{K_t(q-1)}$ if ${\nu'}_j=\nu_j$ and $\e^{-K_t}$ otherwise, are obtained from matrix elements of terms $\exp(qK_t^\star \hat{\bTheta}_j)$ provided that $K_t^\star$ satisfies the duality relation (\^[qK\_t]{}-1)(\^[qK\_t\^]{}-1)=q. The transfer matrix eventually reads as T= (K\_s\_[j=1]{}\^L \_[p=1]{}\^[q-1]{}(\_j\^ \_[j+1]{})\^p ) (K\_t\^\_[j=1]{}\^L \_[p=1]{}\^[q-1]{}\_j\^p ). We have shifted the sum in the last term, starting from $p=1$ which only changes the transfer matrix by a constant prefactor $\e^{K_t^\star}$. This modification affects the free energy density (or the Hamiltonian) by a constant only and does not change the thermodynamic properties. In the Hamiltonian limit $K_s\to 0$, $K_t\to\infty$ with fixed $\lambda=
K_s/K_t^\star$, we obtain the Hamiltonian of the quantum Potts chain H= -12\_[j=1]{}\^L \_[p=1]{}\^[q-1]{}(\_j\^ \_[j+1]{})\^p -12\_[j=1]{}\^L \_[p=1]{}\^[q-1]{}\_j\^p . It is easy to check that in the case $q=2$, we recover the Hamiltonian (\[eqHITF\]) of the quantum Ising chain with $\mat C$ playing the role of $\hat{\bsigma}_z$ and $\mat R$ that of $\hat{\bsigma}_x$. The limit $\lambda\to\infty$ leads to $q$ degenerate ordered ground states $|n,n,n,\dots,n\>$, $n=0,1,\dots, q-1$, while in the other limit $\lambda\to 0$, the term in $\mat{R}_j$ introduces disorder in the ground state through local rotations between $\mat{C}_j$-eigenstates. The critical point of the classical two-dimensional model is given by duality, $(\e^{qK_s}-1)(\e^{qK_t}-1)=q$, i.e. $K_s=K_t^\star$ or $\lambda_c=1$.
A different, but simpler route in order to get the time contribution to the Hamiltonian matrix is the following: in the “row states basis” $|\{\nu_j\}\>$, the time contribution $
\prod_k\e^{K_t(q\delta_{\nu_k,{\nu'}_{k}}-1)}
$ is a product over “single bond time transfer operators” \_k\_[{\_j},{[’]{}\_j}]{} |{[’]{}\_j}\^[K\_t(q\_[\_k, [’]{}\_k]{}-1)]{} {\_j}| which take values $\e^{K_t(q-1)}$ on the diagonal and the same value $\e^{-K_t}$ for all single spin flipping terms, $\e^{-2K_t}$ for simultaneous double spin flipping terms and so on. Anticipating further simplifications which occur while taking the Hamiltonian limit $K_t\to\infty$, we restrict ourselves to single flipping terms. We introduce the symbol ${\sum}'_{\{\nu_j\},\{{\nu'}_j\}}$ with the meaning of a double sum over row states $|\{\nu_j\}\>$ and $|\{{\nu'}_j\}\>$ such that $\forall j\not=k$, ${\nu'}_j=\nu_j$ (single spin flipping terms, since only $\nu_k$ is likely to be flipped between the two row states). The contribution to the Hamiltonian follows from taking the logarithm of this expression which leads to $-\epsilon\mat H$. ([time contribution to T]{}) &=& \_k\
&&LK\_t(q-1)+\^[-qK\_t]{} ’\_[[{\_j},{[’]{}\_j}\_k=\_k]{}]{} |{[’]{}\_j} {\_j}| in the limit of a strong coupling in the time direction, $K_t\to\infty$.
Symmetries
----------
We proceed as in the Ising case to get the symmetries of the Hamiltonian. The classical Potts model is obviously globally unchanged by the cyclic transformation $\forall j$, $0_j\to 1_j$, $1_j\to 2_j$, …$(q-1)_j\to 0_j$. Such a rotation in spin states is realized by the operator $\mat R_j$. We may thus define a charge operator which simultaneously rotates Potts variables at all sites, Q=\_jR\_j. Using the commutation relations between the $\mat R_j$’s and the $\mat C_j$’s, it is easy to prove that the charge operator commutes with the Hamiltonian. Since the eigenvalues of $\mat R_j$ are the $q$ distinct complex numbers $\omega_j=\e^{2i\pi r_j/q}$, those of the charge operator are also given by $q$ numbers $\exp(\sum_j 2i\pi r_j/q)$ which enable to write the Hamiltonian matrix under a block-diagonal structure with $q$ different sectors, depending on the value of $\sum_j r_j\ {\rm mod}(q)$ (the sectors can be referred to as sector \# $0$, $1$, …, $q-1$).
Any operator $\mat O_p$ with the commutation property $\mat O_p\mat Q=\e^{2i\pi p/q}\mat Q\mat O_p$ ($\mat R$ is such an example with $p=0$, $\mat C^\dagger$ is an example with $p=1$, and $\mat C$ with $p=q-1$) has non vanishing matrix elements between states of defined symmetry provided that the charge sectors obey a simple relation $\nu_\psi-\nu_\phi= p$: &&|,| [such that]{} Q|=\^[2i\_/q]{}|, Q|=\^[2i\_/q]{}|, \
&&\_-\_= p|O\_p|=0 As an energy density, we may choose any single term appearing inside the Hamiltonian, e.g. ${\tt Energy\ density}=\mat R_j$. A measure of the order parameter would be provided by ${\tt Local\ order\ parameter}=\mat C_j$, or $\mat C_j^\dagger$ as well. The energy density gives access to the critical exponent $x_\epsilon$. For the order parameter, although the two choices correspond to different values of $p$, since two critical exponents are sufficient in order to determine the whole universality class, the same value of $x_\sigma$ is expected from both definitions. From gap scaling in particular, we expect $(q-1)$-fold degeneracy of the sectors $p\not=0$.
Diagonalization of small chains
-------------------------------
In the case of a quantum $3-$state Potts chain of length $L=2$ with periodic boundary conditions, the action of the Hamiltonian in the $\mat C-$operators eigenbasis is the following, &-&2H|\_1,\_2=2 (\_1\_2\^[-1]{}+\_1\^2\_2\^[-2]{}) |\_1,\_2\
&&+|\_1+1,\_2 +|\_1+2,\_2+|\_1,\_2+1+|\_1,\_2+2,\
&&\_j=(2i\_j/3). We obtain the following $3^2\times 3^2$ matrix, =(
[ccccccccc]{} 4& 1 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0\
1&-2&1&0&1&0&0&1&0\
1&1&-2&0&0&1&0&0&1\
1&0&0&-2&1&1&1&0&0\
0&1&0&1&4&1&0&1&0\
0&0&1&1&1&-2&0&0&1\
1&0&0&1&0&0&-2&1&1\
0&1&0&0&1&0&1&-2&1\
0&0&1&0&0&1&1&1&4\
)
[c]{} |00\_[C]{}\
|01\_[C]{}\
|02\_[C]{}\
|10\_[C]{}\
|11\_[C]{}\
|12\_[C]{}\
|20\_[C]{}\
|21\_[C]{}\
|22\_[C]{}\
the eigenvalues of which are (eigenvalues of $\mat H$ at $\lambda_c=1$), $-2.732$, $-2.137$, $-2.137$, $+0.500$, $+0.500$, $+0.732$, $+1.637$, $+1.637$, and $+2.000$. It is of course more efficient to exploit the symmetries and to work in the $\mat R-$operators eigenbasis where, &-&2H|r\_1,r\_2=2 (|r\_1+1,r\_2-1+|r\_1+2,r\_2-2)\
&&+(\_1+\_1\^2+\_2+\_2\^2)|r\_1,r\_2,\
&&\_j=(2ir\_j/3). The corresponding matrix is now =(
[ccc]{}
[ccc|]{} 4 & 2& 2\
2& -2 & 2\
2& 2& -2\
\
&
[|ccc|]{} -2 & 2& 2\
2& 1 & 2\
2& 2& 1\
\
&&
[|ccc]{} -2 & 2& 2\
2& 1 & 2\
2& 2& 1\
\
)
[c]{} |00\_[R]{}\
|12\_[R]{}\
|21\_[R]{}\
|11\_[R]{}\
|20\_[R]{}\
|02\_[R]{}\
|22\_[R]{}\
|01\_[R]{}\
|10\_[R]{}\
It is block diagonal, with eigenvalues of the first block ($0$ sector) $-2.732$, $+0.732$ and $+2.000$, and the two-fold degenerate eigenvalues of the two remaining identical blocks (sectors $1$ and $2$), $ -2.137$, $+0.500$ and $+1.637$. The ground state and energy eigenstates are given by $|{\tt Gnd}\>=a^{00}_{\tt Gnd}|00\>+
a^{12}_{\tt Gnd}|12\>+a^{21}_{\tt Gnd}|21\>$ and $|{\tt Energy}\>=a^{00}_{\tt Energy}|00\>+
a^{12}_{\tt Energy}|12\>+a^{21}_{\tt Energy}|21\>$ and the energy density follows &=& ||R\_1|[Gnd]{}|\
&=&|a\^[00]{}\_[Energy]{}a\^[00]{}\_[Gnd]{} +a\^[12]{}\_[Energy]{}a\^[12]{}\_[Gnd]{}\^[2i/3]{} +a\^[21]{}\_[Energy]{}a\^[21]{}\_[Gnd]{}\^[4i/3]{}|\
&=&0.613.In the $p=1$ sector, the order parameter density is given by (the notation is obvious) &=& | p=1|C\^\_1|[Gnd]{}|\
&=&|a\^[10]{}\_[Order]{}a\^[00]{}\_[Gnd]{} +a\^[22]{}\_[Order]{}a\^[12]{}\_[Gnd]{} +a\^[01]{}\_[Order]{}a\^[21]{}\_[Gnd]{}|\
&=&0.916,and, due to the complete degeneracy of the two sectors $p=1$ and $p=2$, we get the same result in the remaining sector &=& | p=2|C\_1|[Gnd]{}|\
&=&|a\^[20]{}\_[Order]{}a\^[00]{}\_[Gnd]{} +a\^[02]{}\_[Order]{}a\^[12]{}\_[Gnd]{} +a\^[11]{}\_[Order]{}a\^[21]{}\_[Gnd]{}|\
&=&0.916,
The relevant eigenvalues and matrix elements for systems of sizes $L=2$ and 3 are collected in table \[tabPotts1\].
[llllcc]{} $L$ & $\phantom -E_{\tt Gnd}$ & $\phantom -E_{\tt Energy}$ & $\phantom -E_{\tt Order}$ & $\<{\tt Energy\ density}\> $ & $\<{\tt Order\ parameter}\> $\
$2$ & $-2.732$ & $\phantom -0.732$ & $-2.137$ & $\phantom -0.613$ & $\phantom -0.916$\
$3$ & $-3.842$ & $-1.500$ & $-3.462$ & $\phantom -0.505$ & $\phantom -0.867$\
$2$ & $-4.000$ & $\phantom -0.000$ & $-3.236$ & $\phantom -0.577$ & $\phantom -0.909$\
$3$ & $-5.606$ & $-3.000$ & $-5.123$ & $\phantom - 0.480$ & $\phantom -0.858$\
Interested readers might find helpful to have also the matrix representing the $4-$state Potts chain. When $L=2$ (the matrix is now $4^L\times 4^L$) at the critical coupling $\lambda_c=1$ in its block diagonal form in the $\mat R-$eigenbasis $\{|00\> , |13\> , |22\> , |31\> , |01\> , |10\>
, |23\> , |32\> , |02\> ,
|11\> , |20\> , |33\> , |03\> , |12\> , |21\> ,
|30\> \}$, this matrix reads as =(
[cccc]{}
[rrrr|]{} 6 & 2 & 2 & 2\
2 & -2 & 2 & 2\
2 & 2 & -2 & 2\
2 & 2 & 2 & -2\
\
&
[|rrrr|]{} 2 & 2 & 2 & 2\
2 & 2 & 2 & 2\
2 & 2 & -2 & 2\
2 & 2 & 2 & -2\
\
&&
[|rrrr|]{} 2 & 2 & 2 & 2\
2 & 2 & 2 & 2\
2 & 2 & -2 & 2\
2 & 2 & 2 & -2\
\
&&&
[|rrrr]{} 2 & 2 & 2 & 2\
2 & 2 & 2 & 2\
2 & 2 & -2 & 2\
2 & 2 & 2 & -2\
\
)
The following section, where an approximate determination of the critical exponents of the $3-$ and $4-$state Potts models will be proposed, will make use of the numerical values listed in table \[tabPotts1\].
Discussion {#sec-dissc}
==========
Finite-size estimators of the critical exponents follow from equations (\[eq-e\]) and (\[eq-m\]), x\_=. The results, collected in table \[tab2\] in the case of the Ising, $3-$ and $4-$state Potts models, show as expected a very weak convergence. A strip of width $2$ to $4$ is obviously a poor approximation of the thermodynamic limit. In the case of the Ising model, exact diagonalization [@LiebEtAl61; @Pfeuty70] through Jordan-Wigner transformation into fermion operators, then Bogoljubov-Valatin canonical transformation into free fermions leads to an exact expression for the energy density [@TurbanBerche93] =2L(). Unfortunately, there is no closed expression for the order parameter matrix element which couples two different sectors of the Hamiltonian. Hence, the presence of a boundary term breaks the quadratic expression necessary for the diagonalization.
[llllllllllll]{} &&\
&&\
$L$ & $L'$ & $x_\epsilon$ & $x_\sigma$ &$L$ & $L'$ & $x_\epsilon$ & $x_\sigma$ &$L$ & $L'$ & $x_\epsilon$ & $x_\sigma$\
2 & 3 & 0.501 & 0.120 & 2 & 3 & 0.478 & 0.136 & 2 & 3 & 0.454 & 0.142\
3 & 4 & 0.773 & 0.129 & – & – & – & – & – & – & – & –\
$\infty$ & & 1.000 & 0.125 & $\infty$ & & 0.800 & 0.133 & $\infty$ & & 0.500 & 0.125\
The resort to gap scaling (\[eq-gap\]) as predicted from conformal invariance is thus desirable. Indeed, as emphasized in Section 2, the cylinder geometry is the geometrical shape of the classical problem corresponding to the one-dimensional quantum chain. Since such an infinitely long cylinder follows from the infinite plane geometry through conformal mapping, we may argue that the thermodynamic limit is somehow encoded in the results following from conformal rescaling and a better convergence for the critical exponents is expected. With the normalization of equation (\[eqHITF\]) the fermion excitations take the form $\varepsilon_k=|2\sin\frac k2|$. The sound velocity is thus fixed to unity as previously announced. The results following from gap scaling, x\_=, are collected in table \[tab3\]. The quality of the results is indisputably better than through FSS.
In the case of the Potts model, the sound velocity is not known and it is worth referring to the literature. Gehlen et al. have studied numerically quantum Potts chains in refs. [@GehlenEtAl84; @GehlenEtAl85] where tables of numerical results are reported for $q=3$ up to a size $L=13$ and for $q=4$ up to $L=11$ (they denote $R$ ($P$) the energy gap (magnetic gap) multiplied by the strip size) . These authors used a different normalization and their Hamiltonian for $q=3$ in [@GehlenEtAl84] is related to ours through $\frac 23\mat H_{\tt here}(q=3)+\frac 43\mat 1=
\mat H_{\tt Gehlen}(q=3)$, while in [@GehlenEtAl85] it is related to ours through $\mat H_{\tt here}(q=4)=2\mat H_{\tt Gehlen}(q=4)$. Using the values of the sound velocity quoted in [@GehlenEtAl85], we deduce that in our case the sound velocity is $3/2$ larger for $q=3$ and $2$ times larger for $q=4$, i.e. v\_s(q=3)=1.299,v\_s(q=4)=1.578.These values are used to calculate the exponents reported in table \[tab3\]. Further numerical values denoted with an asterisk are taken from refs. [@GehlenEtAl84; @GehlenEtAl85] to complete the table with results at larger sizes. The expected result in the thermodynamic is also mentioned in the table [@Wu82].
[lllllllll]{} &&\
&&\
$L$ & $x_\epsilon$ & $x_\sigma$ & $L$ & $x_\epsilon$ & $x_\sigma$ & $L$ & $x_\epsilon$ & $x_\sigma$\
2 & 0.900 & 0.132 & 2 & 0.848 & 0.145 & 2 & 0.807 & 0.154\
3 & 0.955 & 0.128 & 3 & 0.861 & 0.139 & 3 & 0.788 & 0.146\
4 & 0.975 & 0.127 & 4 & 0.857 & 0.137 & 4 & 0.767$^\star$ & 0.143$^\star$\
&&&13 & 0.848$^\star$ & 0.134$^\star$ & 11 & 0.700$^\star$ & 0.137$^\star$\
$\infty$ & 1.000 & 0.125& $\infty$ & 0.800 & 0.133 & $\infty$ & 0.500 & 0.125\
To summarize, we note that the quality of the results is acceptable for the relatively small effort of diagonalization of small matrices. The quest for critical exponents is an important step in the characterization of the nature of a phase transition, since these quantities are universal. The study of models of statistical physics which display second-order phase transitions usually requires sophisticated methods, and approximate determinations are often desirable. Considering quite small systems, we reach a few percent accuracy in the determination of the critical exponents in the case of the Ising and $3-$state Potts models. The convergence is poor in the $4-$state Potts case. This is essentially due to the logarithmic corrections present in this model.
Eventually, regarding the relatively small efforts, we believe that an introduction to the study of quantum chains in courses on statistical physics or many-body problems might be of interest.
References {#references .unnumbered}
==========
-12pt
[99]{} \#1\#2\#3\#4\#5\#6[[\#1]{}, \#6, [*\#2*]{} [**\#3**]{}, \#4 (\#5).]{} M.N. Barber, [*Finite-size scaling*]{}, in [*Phase transitions and critical phenomena*]{}, Vol. 8, C. Domb and J.L. Lebowitz eds. Academic Press (London 1983) pp145-266. L. Turban, Lecture notes on phase transitions and critical phenomena, Université de Nancy 1, 1989, unpublished,
[^1]: We denote by $S[x(\tau)]$ the functional of a continuous function and $\sum_iH\{x_i\}$ the corresponding sum over a set of discrete variables.
[^2]: The normalization with a factor 2 ensures a sound velocity equal to 1 (i.e. a linear dispersion relation at long wavelength with slope unity) and is necessary in order to compare later with conformal invariance predictions (see discussion).
[^3]: For simplicity, we use a short notation $|\uparrow,\downarrow,\uparrow,\dots,\uparrow\>$ for $|\uparrow_1\>\otimes |\downarrow_2\>\otimes
|\uparrow_3\>\otimes\dots \otimes|\uparrow_L\>$.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: |
The zero-temperature magnetoconductivity of just-metallic Si:P scales with magnetic field, $H$, and dopant concentration, $n$, lying on a single universal curve: $\sigma(n,H)/\sigma(n,0) =
G[H^{-\delta}\Delta n]$ with $\delta\approx 2$. We note that Si:P, Si:B, and Si:As all have unusually large magnetic field crossover exponents near 2, and suggest that this anomalously weak response to a magnetic field is a common feature of uncompensated doped semiconductors.
address:
- 'Physics Department, City College of the City University of New York, New York, New York 10031'
- 'National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306'
- 'Serin Physics Laboratory, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854'
author:
- 'M. P. Sarachik, D. Simonian, S. V. Kravchenko, and S. Bogdanovich'
- 'V. Dobrosavljevic'
- 'G. Kotliar'
title: 'The metal-insulator transition in Si:X: Anomalous response to a magnetic field.'
---
[2]{}
The metal-insulator transition (MIT) that occurs in doped semiconductors and in amorphous metal-semiconductor mixtures is a continuous phase transition [@mikko; @belitz; @sasha]. Some difficulty has been encountered in demonstrating the scaling that is expected to hold near such a transition. Scaling with temperature and dopant concentration has been shown to hold for Si:P in the presence of a magnetic field of $75$ kOe [@belitz]. However, the conductivity does not appear to scale with temperature in the absence of a magnetic field: scaling [@belitz2] is obtained only if one chooses a critical conductivity exponent, $\mu \approx 0.29$, considerably smaller than the value found experimentally [@rosenbaum; @stupp; @peihua]. On the other hand, scaling of the zero-temperature conductivity has been demonstrated with magnetic field for p-type Si:B [@snezana], albeit with an anomalously large magnetic field crossover exponent near 2. This raises the issue whether the anomalously weak response to a magnetic field is due to the spin-orbit scattering present in boron-doped silicon, or whether it is a general feature of uncompensated doped semiconductors near the metal-insulator transition. Si:P is considered the archetypical strongly correlated disordered system, and is used as a standard against which newer materials are compared [@aeppli]. It is therefore of great fundamental interest to determine the functional form of the magnetoresistance close to its MIT.
To address these issues, we report measurements of the magnetoconductivity of Si:P. Detailed analysis of data taken at low temperatures in magnetic fields to 90 kOe allows us to identify separate, temperature-dependent components, yielding reliable determinations of the zero-temperature conductivity. Our results demonstrate that the zero-temperature conductivity scales with magnetic field and dopant concentrations, $\sigma (n,H)/\sigma(n,0) = G(H^{-\delta}\Delta n)= F (H/H^*)$, with a crossover exponent, $\delta\approx2$, comparable to the anomalously large crossover exponent of Si:B [@snezana]. Moreover, earlier data of Shafarman et al. [@shafarman] indicate that the magnetoconductance of Si:As strongly resembles that of Si:P, scaling with a similar crossover function and exponent. We note that all the silicon-based doped semiconductors exhibit an anomalously weak response to a magnetic field, and suggest that this is a feature of the universality class of silicon-based doped semiconductors that is currently not understood.
Four Czochralski-grown Si:P samples were used in our studies with dopant concentrations $3.60, 3.66, 3.95$ and $4.21 \times 10^{18}
\mbox{ cm}^{-3}$. Based on a critical concentration $n_c = 3.46\times 10^{18} \mbox{ cm}^{-3}$ [@peihua], this corresponds to $1.04 n_c$, $1.06 n_c$, $1.14 n_c$, and $1.22 n_c$. Measurements were taken at temperatures between 0.037 K and 0.5 K in magnetic fields up to 90 kOe. Sample characterization and measurement techniques are described elsewhere [@peihua; @peihua2].
At temperatures sufficiently low that corrections due to localization are small, finite temperature corrections due to interactions are expected to yield a conductivity [@altsh; @altsh2; @lee; @theory]: $$\sigma(n,T)=\sigma(n,0)+A(n)T^{\frac{1}{2}}.\label{1}$$ in the absence of a magnetic field. The slope $A(n)=(\sigma_{ex}-\sigma_{Har})/T^{1/2}$, where the exchange term, $\sigma_{ex}$, and the Hartree term, $\sigma_{Har}$, contribute with opposite sign. The Hartree term consists of a $S_z=0$ channel, $\sigma_{s0}$, which is independent of magnetic field, and field-dependent $S_z=\pm1$ contributions, $\sigma_{s\pm}$, which are suppressed in very large fields. Thus: $$A(n) T^{\frac{1}{2}} = (\sigma_{ex} - \sigma_{s0}) - \sigma_{s\pm}.
\label{2}$$ For doped semiconductors in the absence of a magnetic field, the slope $A(n)$ is net positive near the transition and changes sign as one moves away toward higher dopant concentration $n$. For the four specimens used in our study, the slope is positive for the sample closest to the transition $(n=1.04n_c)$, $A\approx0$ for the sample with $n=1.06 n_c$, and the two samples furthest from the transition have net negative slopes $A$. The samples used in our experiments thus span concentrations that include temperature coefficients for the conductivity that are positive, zero and negative in the absence of a field.
The conductivity of one sample (for which A is net negative) is plotted in Fig. \[fig1\] as a function of temperature at various fixed magnetic fields. The inset shows the conductivity in large magnetic field on an expanded scale. The curves are parallel to each other in fields above 10 or 20 kOe, indicating that the temperature dependence in high magnetic fields is independent of the field. Similar behavior is found for the other three samples. This is also demonstrated in Fig. \[fig2\] (a), where the conductivity is shown as a function of magnetic field for one sample at four different temperatures. Again, it is clear that the curves at different temperatures are parallel to each other in fields above 10 or 20 kOe. Thus, in sufficiently high fields the dependence on temperature is independent of field, corresponding to the term $(\sigma_{ex} - \sigma_{s0}) T^{\frac{1}{2}}$ in Eq. (2) above. As shown in Fig. \[fig2\] (b), all the curves can be brought into coincidence in high magnetic fields by subtracting this temperature-dependent term from the total conductivity. Deviations occur in small fields, becoming increasingly pronounced as the temperature increases: the conductivity flattens below a magnetic field $H$ given approximately by $g\mu_BH\approx
k_BT$. This corresponds to the triplet channel contribution, $\sigma_{s\pm}
T^{\frac{1}{2}}$, of Eq. (2).
The curves shown in Fig. \[fig2\] (b) for 37, 50 and 70 mK differ from each other by small amounts compared to the overall change of the conductivity with magnetic field; the lowest temperature data are thus close to the $T=0$ curve on this scale. Setting $\sigma(H,0)\approx\sigma(H,37
\text{ mK})$, we show $\sigma(H,0)/\sigma(0,0)$ plotted as a function of $H$ for all four samples in Fig. \[fig3\] (a). These four very similar curves can be collapsed onto a single curve by appropriate choices of a scaling parameter $H^*$, as shown in Fig. \[fig3\] (b). We have thereby demonstrated that the zero-temperature conductivity scales with magnetic field, taking on the form [@dima; @pfeuty]: $$\frac{\sigma (n,H)}{\sigma (n,0)} = G (H^{-\delta}\Delta n)=
F(\frac{H}{H^*})
\label{3}$$ with a crossover function $G (H^{-\delta}\Delta n)$, a magnetic-field crossover exponent $\delta$, and a scaling parameter $H^*$ that should obey a power law in the critical region, $H^* \propto \Delta n^{1/\delta}$.
We note that scaling appears to hold quite well for the samples that have negative as well as positive zero-field slopes $A$. The crossover function of Fig. \[fig3\] (b) exhibits complex behavior at low fields, and becomes linear with magnetic field at high fields. The inset to Fig. \[fig3\] (b) shows $H^*$ versus $\Delta n \equiv(n - n_c)$ on a log-log scale, using $n_c =3.46 \times 10^{18}
\mbox{ cm}^{-3}$ [@peihua]. (Data are included in the inset for samples measured earlier and not otherwise presented in this paper.) There appear to be deviations from a straight line (power law behavior) at the highest dopant concentration, perhaps indicating that the last sample is not in the critical region. Additional careful studies are needed to determine the breadth of the critical regime. The (inverse) slope yields a magnetic-field crossover exponent $\delta\approx2$, which is unusually large. A similar analysis yields the curves shown for Si:B [@snezana] in Figs. \[fig4\] (a), and scaling is obtained for appropriate choices of the scaling parameter $H^*$, as shown in Fig. \[fig4\] (b). The inset is a plot of $H^*$ versus $\Delta n$ on a log-log scale. Again, deviations from power-law behavior are apparent at the higher dopant concentrations, implying that these are outside the critical range; the crossover exponent $\delta\approx1.9$.
Si:P and Si:B both have large $\delta$’s near 2. However, their crossover functions are quite different, as illustrated in Fig. \[fig4\] (b) where both are shown for comparison. The effect of a magnetic field is considerably stronger in the case of Si:B: a 90 kOe field easily drives a just-metallic sample into the insulating phase. The magnetoconductance of Si:B exhibits the theoretically expected $H^{\frac{1}{2}}$ behavior [@lee; @lee2] over a broad range of fields. On the other hand, the magnetoconductance of Si:P displays $H^{\frac{1}{2}}$ dependence only in moderate magnetic fields and becomes strictly linear in $H$ at higher fields; the conductivity of Si:As exhibits very similar behavior [@shafarman] to Si:P. We note that the theory of refs. [@lee] and [@lee2] is valid only outside the critical region, and the behavior near the transition is not known. The observed deviation from $H^{\frac{1}{2}}$ may simply reflect the fact that sufficiently high magnetic fields drive our samples toward the transition and into the critical range. The scaling found in this paper suggests that a magnetic field drives samples into the critical regime for $H>H^*\propto\Delta
n^{1/\delta}$.
In both Si:B and Si:P, there are also clear deviations from $H^{\frac{1}{2}}$ behavior in small magnetic fields: attempts to fit to this form yield a zero-field conductivity that is decidedly inconsistent with the measured value. This unexpected behavior in small magnetic fields is also reflected in anomalous temperature-dependence at low temperatures, and will be discussed elsewhere.
To summarize, the zero-temperature conductivities of Si:P and Si:B both scale as a function of magnetic field and dopant concentration, $\sigma (n,H)/\sigma (n,0) = F (H/H^*) = G (H^{-\delta}\Delta n)$, with an anomalously large crossover exponent near 2. Analysis of published data for Si:As [@shafarman] indicates that scaling is also obeyed in this system, again with a crossover exponent substantially larger than 1. In contrast, theory predicts crossover exponents considerably smaller than 1: orbital effects are expected to give a magnetic field crossover exponent $\delta=1/2$ [@dima], and calculations done to date indicate that coupling of the magnetic field to the electrons’ spin yields an even smaller value [@castellani; @raimondi]. Since $(\Delta n)
\propto H^\delta$, this implies that very near the transition, a small magnetic field should induce a very large change in critical concentration. The large crossover exponent found in our experiments signals instead that for both n-type and p-type uncompensated doped silicon, a small magnetic field induces a small change in the critical concentration. This anomalously weak response to a magnetic field is a feature of the universality class of silicon-based doped semiconductors that warrants further study.
This work was supported by the U. S. Department of Energy under grant no. DE-FG02-84-ER45153.
M. A. Paalanen, T. F. Rosenbaum, G. A. Thomas, and R. N. Bhatt, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**48**]{}, 1284 (1982). D. Belitz and T. R. Kirkpatrick, Rev. Mod. Phys. [**66**]{}, 261 (1994). A. M. Finkel’stein, Soviet Physics Reviews, Section A, Volume 14, part 2, pp. 1-101 (Harwood Academic Publishers (1990)). D. Belitz and T. R. Kirkpatrick, Phys. Rev. B [**52**]{}, 13 922 (1995). T. F. Rosenbaum, R. F. Milligan, M. A. Paalanen, G. A. Thomas, R. N. Bhatt, and W. Lin, Phys. Rev. B [**27**]{}, 7509 (1983). H. Stupp, M. Hornung, M. Lakner, O. Madel, and H. v. Lohneysen, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**71**]{}, 2634 (1993). P. Dai, Y. Zhang, S. Bogdanovich, and M. P. Sarachik, Phys. Rev. B [**48**]{}, 4941 (1993). S. Bogdanovich, P. Dai, M. P. Sarachik, V. Dobrosavljevic, and G. Kotliar, Phys. Rev. B [**55**]{}, 4215 (1997). J. F. DiTusa, K. Friemelt, E. Bucher, G. Aeppli, and A. P. Ramirez, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**78**]{}, 2831 (1997). When inverted to give $\sigma=1/\rho$, the resistivity curves published by Shafarman et al. \[W. N. Shafarman, T. G. Castner, J. S. Brooks, K. P. Martin, and M. J. Naughton, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**56**]{}, 980 (1986)\] yield conductivities that exhibit linear behavior up to $15$ $T$. P. Dai, Y. Zhang, and M. P. Sarachik, Phys. Rev. B [**45**]{}, 3984 (1992). B. L. Altshuler and A. G. Aronov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. [**77**]{}, 2028 (1979) \[Sov. Phys. - JETP [**50**]{}, 968 (1979)\]; Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. [**30**]{}, 514 (1979) \[JETP Lett. [**30**]{}, 482 (1979)\]; Solid State Commun. [**46**]{}, 429 (1983). B. L. Altshuler, D. E. Khmel’nitskii, A. I. Larkin, and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. B [**22**]{}, 5142 (1980). For an excellent review, see P. A. Lee and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Rev. Mod. Phys. [**57**]{}, 287 (1985). This expression is generally used to fit experimental results, including data for samples very close to the critical concentration. We note, however, that its validity in the critical region has not been established. D. E. Khmel’nitskii and A. I. Larkin, Solid State Commun. [**39**]{}, 1069 (1981). P. Pfeuty, D. Jasnow, and M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B [**10**]{}, 2088 (1974); S. Singh and D. Jasnow, Phys. Rev. B [**11**]{}, 3445 (1975). P. A. Lee and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Phys. Rev. B [**26**]{}, 4009 (1982). C. Castellani and G. Kotliar, Physica A [**167**]{}, 294 (1990). R. Raimondi, C. Castellani, and C. Di Castro, Phys. Rev. B [**42**]{}, 4724 (1990).
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'In this paper we introduce non-commutative fields and forms on a new kind of non-commutative algebras: $\rho$-algebras. We also define the Frölicher–Nijenhuis bracket in the non-commutative geometry on $\rho$-algebras.'
address: |
Department of Differential Equations, Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics, University Transilvania of Braşov, 2200 Braşov, Romania\
E-mail: [email protected]
author:
- CĂTĂLIN CIUPALĂ
title: 'Fields and forms on $\pmb {\rho}$-algebras'
---
=mtmib at 10.4pt
Introduction
============
There are some ways to define the Frölicher–Nijenhuis bracket in non-commutative differential geometry. The Frölicher–Nijenhuis bracket on the algebra of universal differential forms of a non-commutative algebra, is presented in [@Cap], the Frölicher–Nijenhuis bracket in several kinds of differential graded algebras are defined in [@Dub2] and the Frölicher–Nijenhuis bracket on colour commutative algebras is defined in [@Lyc]. But this notion is not defined on $\rho$-algebras in the context of non-commutative geometry. In this paper we introduce the Frölicher–Nijenhuis bracket on a $\rho$-algebra $A$ using the algebra of universal differential forms $\Omega^{\ast}(A)$.
A $\rho$-algebra $A$ over the field $k$ ($\mathbb{C}$ or $\mathbb{R}$) is a $G$-graded algebra ($G$ is a commutative group) together with a twisted cocycle These algebras were defined for the first time in the paper [@Bon] and are generalizations of usual algebras (the case when $G$ is trivial) and of $\mathbb{Z}$ ($\mathbb{Z}_2$)-superalgebras (the case when $G$ is $\mathbb{Z}$ resp. $\mathbb{Z}_2$). Our construction of the Frölicher–Nijenhuis bracket for $\rho$-algebras, in this paper, is a generalization of this bracket from [@Cap].
In §2 we present a class of non-commutative algebras which are $\rho$-algebras, derivations and bimodules. In §3 we define the algebra of (non-commutative) universal differential forms $\Omega^{*}(A)$ of a $\rho$-algebra $A$. In §4 we present the Frölicher–Nijenhuis calculus on $A$, the Nijenhuis algebra of $A$, and the Frölicher–Nijenhuis bracket on $A$. We also show the naturality of the Frölicher–Nijenhuis bracket.
$\pmb{\rho}$-Algebras
=====================
In this section we present a class of non-commutative algebras that are $\rho$-algebras. For more details see [@Bon].
Let $G$ be an abelian group, additively written, and let $A$ be a $G$-graded algebra. This implies that the vector space $A$ has a $G$-grading $A=\oplus_{a\in G} A_{a}$, and that $A_{a}
A_{b} \subset A_{a+b}$ $(a,b\in G)$. The $G$-degree of a (non-zero) homogeneous element $f$ of $A$ is denoted as $\left| f\right|$. Futhermore let be a map which satisfies $$\begin{aligned}
&\rho (a,b) = \rho (b,a)^{-1}, \quad a,b\in G,\\[.2pc]
&\rho (a+b,c) = \rho (a,c)\rho (b,c), \quad a,b,c\in G.\end{aligned}$$
This implies $\rho (a,b)\neq 0$, $\rho (0,b)=0$ and $\rho (c,c)=\pm 1$ for all $a,b,c\in G$, $c\neq 0$. We define for homogeneous elements $f$ and $g$ in $A$ an expression, which is $\rho$-commutator of $f$ and $g$ as $$[f,g]_{\rho} = fg-\rho (\left| f\right| \left| g\right|)gf.$$
This expression as it stands make sense only for homogeneous elements $f$ and $g$, but can be extended linearly to general elements. A $G$-graded algebra $A$ with a given cocycle $\rho$ will be called $\rho$-commutative if $fg = \rho (\left\vert f\right\vert\!,\left\vert
g\right\vert)gf$ for all homogeneous elements $f$ and $g$ in $A$.
$\left.\right.$
1. Any usual (commutative) algebra is a $\rho$-algebra with the trivial group $G.$
2. Let $G=\mathbb{Z}$ ($\mathbb{Z}_{2}$) be the group and the cocycle $\rho (a,b) = (-1)^{ab}$, for any $a, b\in G$. In this case any $\rho$-(commutative) algebra is a super(commutative) algebra.
3. The $N$-dimensional quantum hyperplane [@Bon; @Ci1; @Ci3] $S_{N}^{q}$, is the algebra generated by the unit element and $N$ linearly independent elements $x_{1}, \ldots, x_{N}$ satisfying the relations: $$\hskip -1.25pc x_{i} x_{j} = qx_{j} x_{i}, \quad i < j$$ for some fixed $q\in k,$ $q\neq 0$. $S_{N}^{q}$ is a $\mathbb{Z}^{N}$-graded algebra, i.e., $$\hskip -1.25pc S_{N}^{q} = \mathop{\oplus}\limits_{n_{1},\ldots, n_{N}}^{\infty} (S_{N}^{q})_{n_{1}\ldots n_{N}},$$ with $(S_{N}^{q})_{n_{1} \ldots n_{N}}$ the one-dimensional subspace spanned by products $x^{n_{1}} \cdots x^{n_{N}}$. The $\mathbb{Z}^{N}$-degree of these elements is denoted by $$\hskip -1.25pc \left\vert x^{n_{1}} \cdots x^{n_{N}}\right\vert = n =
(n_{1}, \ldots, n_{N}).$$ Define the function as $$\hskip -1.25pc \rho (n, n^{\prime}) = q^{\sum_{j, k=1}^{N}
n_{j}n_{k}^{\prime} \alpha_{jk}},$$ with $\alpha_{jk}=1$ for $j<k$, 0 for $j=k$ and $-1$ for $j>k$. It is obvious that $S_{N}^{q}$ is a $\rho$-commutative algebra.
4. The algebra of matrix $M_{n}\!\left(\mathbb{C}\right)$ [@Ci4] is $\rho$-commutative as follows:
Let $$\hskip -1.25pc p = \left( \begin{array}{llll}
1 &0 &\ldots &0\\
0 &\varepsilon &\ldots &0\\
\ldots & & &\\
0 &0 &\ldots &\varepsilon^{n-1}
\end{array} \right) \quad \hbox{and} \quad
q = \left( \begin{array}{lllll}
0 &0 &\ldots &0 &1\\
\varepsilon &0 &\ldots &0 &0\\
0 &\varepsilon^{2} &\ldots &0 &0\\
\ldots & & & &\\
0 &0 &\ldots &\varepsilon^{n-1} &0
\end{array} \right),$$ $p,q\in M_{n}(\mathbb{C})$, where $\varepsilon^{n}=1$, $\varepsilon \neq
1$. Then $pq=\varepsilon qp$ and $M_{n}(\mathbb{C})$ is generated by the set $B=\{p^{a}q^{b}|a,b=0,1,\ldots,n-1\}$.
It is easy to see that $p^{a} q^{b} = \varepsilon^{ab} q^{b} p^{a}$ and $q^{b} p^{a} = \varepsilon^{-ab}p^{a}q^{b}$ for any $a,b=0,1,\ldots,n-1$. Let $G:=\mathbb{Z}_{n}\oplus \mathbb{Z}_{n}$, $\alpha = (\alpha_{1}, \alpha_{2})\in G$ and $x_{\alpha} :=
p^{\alpha_{1}} q^{\alpha_{2}} \in M_{n} (\mathbb{C})$. If we denote $\rho
(\alpha, \beta) = \varepsilon^{\alpha_{2} \beta_{1} - \alpha_{1}
\beta_{2}}$ then $x_{\alpha} x_{\beta} = \rho (\alpha, \beta)
x_{\beta} x_{\alpha}$, for any $\alpha, \beta \in G$, $x_{\alpha},
x_{\beta}\in B$.
It is obvious that the map , $\rho (\alpha,\beta) = \varepsilon^{\alpha_{2} \beta_{i} -
\alpha_{1} \beta_{2}}$ is a cocycle and that $M_{n}\!
\left(\mathbb{C}\right)$ is a $\rho$-commutative algebra.
Let $\alpha$ be an element of the group $G$. A $\rho$-derivation $X$ of $A$, of degree $\alpha$ is a bilinear map of $G$-degree $\left| X\right|$ i.e. , such that one has for all elements $f\in
A_{\left| f\right|}$ and $g\in A$, $$X(fg) = (Xf)g + \rho (\alpha,\left| f\right|)f(Xg).$$ Without any difficulties it can be obtained that if algebra $A$ is $\rho$-commutative, $f\in A_{\left| f\right|}$ and $X$ is a $\rho$-derivation of degree $\alpha$, then $fX$ is a $\rho$-derivation of degree $\left| f\right| +\alpha$ and the $G$-degree $\left| f\right|
+\left| X\right|$ i.e. $$(fX)(gh) = ((fX)g)h+\rho (\left| f\right| +\alpha,\left| g\right|)g(fX)h$$ and
We say that is a $\rho$-derivation if it has degree equal to $G$-degree $\left| X\right|$ i.e. and $X(fg)=(Xf)g+\rho (\left|
X\right|,\left| f\right|)f(Xg)$ for any $f\in A_{\left| f\right|}$ and $g\in A$.
It is known [@Bon] that the $\rho$-commutator of two $\rho$-derivations is again a $\rho$-derivation and the linear space of all $\rho$-derivations is a $\rho$-Lie algebra, denoted by $\rho$-Der$A$.
One verifies immediately that for such an algebra $A$, $\rho$-Der$A$ is not only a $\rho$-Lie algebra but also a left $A$-module with the action of $A$ on $\rho$-Der$A$ defined by $$(fX)g=f(Xg) \quad f,g\in A, \ X\in \rho\text{-Der}\,A.$$
Let $M$ be a $G$-graded left module over a $\rho$-commutative algebra $A$, with the usual properties, in particular $\left| f\psi \right|
=\left| f\right| +\left| \psi \right|$ for $f\in A, \psi \in M$. Then $M$ is also a right $A$-module with the right action on $M$ defined by $$\psi f=\rho (\left| \psi \right|, \left| f\right|)f\psi.$$
In fact $M$ is a bimodule over $A$, i.e. $$f(\psi g)=(f\psi)g \quad f,g\in A,\text{ }\psi \in M.$$
Let $M$ and $N$ be two $G$-graded bimodules over the $\rho$-algebra $A$. Let be an $A$-bimodule homomorphism of degree $\alpha \in G$ if such that $f(am)=\rho (\alpha, \left| a\right|)af(m)$ and $f(ma)=f(m)a$ for any $a\in A_{\left| a\right|}$ and $m\in M$. We denote by Hom$_\alpha (M,N)$ the space of $A$-bimodule homomorphisms of degree $\alpha$ and by Hom$_A^A(M,N)= {\oplus}_{\alpha \in G}$Hom$_\alpha
(M,N)$ the space of all $A$-bimodule homomorphisms.
Differential forms on a $\pmb{\rho}$-algebra
============================================
$A$ is a $\rho$-algebra as in the previous section. We denote by $\Omega_\alpha ^1(A)$ the space generated by the elements: *adb* of $G$-degree $\left| a\right| +\left| b\right| =\alpha$ with the usual relations: $$d(a+b) = d(a)+d(b), \quad d(ab) = d(a)b + ad(b) \quad \hbox{and} \quad
d1 = 0,$$ where 1 is the unit of the algebra $A$.
If we denote by $\Omega^1(A)=\sum_\alpha \Omega_\alpha ^1(A)$ then $\Omega^{1} (A)$ is an $A$-bimodule and satisfies the following theorem of universality.
For any $A$-bimodule $M$ and for any derivation of degree $\left| X\right|$ there is an $A$-bimodule homomorphism of degree $\left| X\right|$ $(f\in \
$[Hom]{}$_{\left| X\right|}$ $(\Omega ^1(A),M))$ such that $X=f\circ d$. The homomorphism is uniquely determined and the corresponding $X\mapsto f$ establishes an isomorphism between $\rho$-${\rm Der}_{\left| X\right|}(A,M)$ and [Hom]{}$_{\left| X\right|}(\Omega^1(A),M)$.
We define the map by $f(adb)=\rho
(\left\vert X\right\vert,\left\vert a\right\vert)aX(b)$ which transform the usual Leibniz rule for the operator $d$ into the $\rho$-Leibniz rule for the deriva-tion $X$.$\Box$
Starting from the $A$-bimodule $\Omega^{1}(A)$ and the $\rho$-algebra $\Omega ^{0}(A)=A$ we build up *the algebra of differential forms over* $A$.
This algebra will be a new $\overline{\rho}$-algebra $$\Omega^{*}(A) = \sum_{n\in \mathbb{N},\alpha \in G} \Omega_\alpha^n(A)$$ graded by the group $\overline{G}=\mathbb{Z}\times G$ and generated by elements $a\in A_{\left| a\right|}=\Omega_{\left| a\right|}^0(A)$ of degree $(0,\left| a\right|)$ and their differentials $da\in
\Omega_{\left| a\right|}^1(A)$ of degree $(1,\left| a\right|)$.
We will also require the universal derivation which can be extended to a $\overline{\rho}$-derivation of the algebra $\Omega^{*}(A)$ of degree $(1,0)$ in such a way that $d^2=0$ and $\overline{\rho}|_{G\times
G}=\rho.$ Denote by $\omega \wedge \theta \in \Omega_{\alpha +\beta
}^{n+m}(A)$ the product of forms $\omega \in \Omega_\alpha ^n(A),$ $\theta \in \Omega _\beta ^m(A)$ in the algebra $\Omega ^{*}(A)$. Then $${\rm d}(\omega \wedge \theta) = {\rm d}\omega \wedge \theta
+\overline{\rho} ((1,0),(n,\alpha))\omega \wedge {\rm d}\theta,$$ and $${\rm d}^2 (\omega \wedge \theta) = \overline{\rho} ((1,0), (n+1,\alpha))
{\rm d}\omega \wedge {\rm d}\theta +\overline{\rho} ((1,0), (n, \alpha))
{\rm d}\omega \wedge {\rm d}\theta =0.$$
Hence $$\overline{\rho }((1,0),(n+1,\alpha))+\overline{\rho }((1,0),(n,\alpha))=0.
\label{9}$$
From these relations it follows that $$\overline{\rho }((1,0),(n,\alpha))=(-1)^{n}\varphi (\alpha),$$ where is the group homomorphism $\varphi (\alpha)=\overline{\rho }((1,0),(0,\alpha))$. From the properties of the cocycle $\rho$, $$\overline{\rho }((n,\alpha),(m,\beta))=(-1)^{nm}\varphi ^{-m}(\alpha
)\varphi ^{n}(\beta)\rho (\alpha,\beta) \label{10}$$ for any $n,m\in \mathbb{Z}$ and $\alpha,\beta \in G$.
$\left.\right.$
Let $A$ be a $\rho$-algebra with the cocycle $\rho$. Then any cocycle $\overline{\rho}$ on the group $\overline{G}$ with the conditions $\overline{\rho}|_{G\times G} = \rho$ and $(\ref{9})$ are given by $(\ref{10})$ for some homomorphism
We will denote below $\Omega^{*}(A,\varphi)$ or simply $\Omega
^{*}(A)$ the $\overline{G}$-graded algebra of forms with the cocycle $\overline{\rho}$ and the derivation $d=d_\varphi$ of degree (1, 0).
Therefore for any $\rho$-algebra $A$, a group homomorphism and an element $\alpha \in G$, we have the complex:
$0\rightarrow A_\alpha \mathop{\rightarrow}\limits^{d_\varphi } \Omega
_\alpha ^1(A,\varphi) \mathop{\rightarrow }\limits^{d_\varphi }\Omega
_\alpha ^2(A,\varphi) \mathop{\rightarrow }\limits^{d_\varphi } \cdots
\mathop{\rightarrow }\limits^{d_\varphi } \Omega _\alpha ^i(A,\varphi)
\mathop{\rightarrow }\limits^{d_\varphi } \Omega _\alpha
^{i+1}(A,\varphi) \mathop{\rightarrow }\limits^{d_\varphi }
\cdots$.
The cohomology of this complex term $\Omega _{\alpha}^{i}
(A,\varphi)$ is denoted by $H_{\alpha }^{i}(A,\varphi)$ and will be called as the *de Rham cohomology of the* $\rho$-*algebra*$A$.
$\left.\right.$
Let be a homomorphism of degree $\alpha \in G$ between the $G$-graded $\rho$-algebras. There is a natural homomorphism which in degree $n$ is and has the $G^{\prime}$-degree $(0,(n+1)\alpha)$ given by $$\Omega^{n}(f)(a_{0} {\rm d}a_{1} \wedge \cdots \wedge
{\rm d}a_{n}) = f(a_{0}) {\rm d}f(a_{1}) \wedge \cdots \wedge {\rm d}
f(a_{n}).\label{11}$$
Frölicher–Nijenhuis bracket of $\pmb{\rho}$-algebras
====================================================
*Derivations*
-------------
Here we present the Frölicher–Nijenhuis calculus over the algebra of forms defined in the previous section.
Denote by Der$_{(k,\alpha)}(\Omega ^{*}(A))$ the space of derivations of degree $(k,\alpha)$ i.e. an element $D\in$ Der$_{(k,\alpha)}(\Omega
^{*}(A))$ satisfies the relations:
1. $D$ is linear,
2. the $G^{\prime}$-degree of $D$ is $\left| D\right| =(k,\alpha)$, and
3. $D(\omega \wedge \theta)=D\omega \wedge \theta +\overline{\rho}
((k,\alpha),(n,\beta))\omega \wedge D\theta$ for any $\theta \in
\Omega_\beta ^n(A)$.
The space $\overline{\rho}$-[Der]{}$ \ \Omega ^{*}(A)=\oplus _{(k,\alpha)\in
\overline{G}}$[Der]{}$_{(k,\alpha)}\ \Omega ^{*}(A)$ is a $\overline{\rho}$-Lie algebra with the bracket $[D_1,D_2]=D_1\circ D_2-\overline{\rho }(\left|
D_1\right|,\left| D_2\right|)D_2\circ D_1$.
*Fields*
--------
Let us denote by Hom$_{A}^{A}(\Omega
^{1}(A),A)\rightarrow \rho$-Der $(A)$ the isomorphism from Theorem 1. We also denote by $\mathfrak{X} (A):=$ Hom$_{A}^{A}(\Omega ^{1}(A),A)$ the space of fields of the algebra $A$. Then -Der$(A;A)$ is an isomorphism of vector $G$-graded spaces. The space of $\rho$-derivations $\rho$-Der$(A)$ is a Lie $\rho$-algebra with the $\rho$-bracket $[\cdot,\cdot]$, and so we have an induced $\rho$-Lie bracket on $\mathfrak{X}(A)$ which is given by $$\mathcal{L}([X,Y])=[\mathcal{L}_{X},\mathcal{L}_{Y}]=
\mathcal{L}_{X}\mathcal{ L}_{Y}-\rho (\left\vert X\right\vert,\left\vert
Y\right\vert)\mathcal{L} _{Y}\mathcal{L}_{X} \label{12}$$ and will be referred to as the $\rho$-Lie bracket of fields.
Each field $X\in \mathfrak{X}(A)$ is by definition an $A$-bimodule homomorphism $\Omega_1(A)\rightarrow A$ and it prolongs uniquely to a graded $\overline{\rho }$-derivation of degree $(-1,\left| X\right|)$ by$$\begin{aligned}
j_X(a) &= 0 \quad \hbox{ for }\ a\in A=\Omega ^0(A),\\[.2pc]
j_X(\omega) &= X(\omega) \quad \hbox{ for }\ \omega \in \Omega ^1(A)\end{aligned}$$ and $$\begin{aligned}
&j_X(\omega _1\wedge \omega _2\wedge\cdots \wedge \omega _k)\\[.2pc]
&\quad\ = \sum_{i=1}^{k-1} \overline{\rho
} \left( \left(-1, |X|\right), \left(i - 1, \sum_{j=1}^{i-1} |\omega_i| \right)
\right) \omega _1\wedge\cdots \wedge \omega_{i-1} \wedge X(\omega _i)\\[.2pc]
&\qquad\ \ \times \omega _{i+1}\wedge\cdots \wedge \omega _k
+\overline{\rho } \left(\left(-1, |X|\right), \left(k - 1, \sum_{j=1}^{k-1}
|\omega_i| \right) \right)\\[.2pc]
&\qquad\ \ \times \omega _1\wedge\cdots \wedge \omega _{k-1}X(\omega _k)\end{aligned}$$ for any $\omega_i\in \Omega _{\left| \omega _i\right|}^1(A)$. The $\overline{\rho}$-derivation $j_X$ is called the contraction operator of thefield $X$.
This is an easy computation.$\Box$
With some abuse of notation we also write $\omega (X) = X(\omega) =
j_X(\omega)$ for $\omega \in \Omega^1(A)$ and $X\in
\mathfrak{X}(A)=$Hom$_A^A(\Omega ^1(A),A)$.
### *Algebraic derivations:*
A $\overline{\rho}$-derivation $D\in$ Der$_{(k,\alpha)}\Omega (A)$ is called $algebraic$ if $D|_{\Omega^0(A)}=0$. Then $D(a\omega)=\overline{
\rho} ((k,\alpha), (0,\left| a\right|)) aD (\omega)$ and $D(\omega a) =
D(\omega)a$ for any $a\in A_{\left| a\right|}$ and $\omega \in \Omega
(A)$. It results that $D$ is an $A$-bimodule homomorphism. We denote by Hom$_\alpha (\Omega _l(A),\Omega _{k+l}(A))$ the space of $A$-bimodule homomorphisms from $\Omega_{(l,\alpha)}(A)$ to $\Omega_{(l+k,\alpha)}(A)$ of degree $(k,\alpha)$. Then an algebraic derivation $D$ of degree $(k,\alpha)$ is from Hom$_\alpha
(\Omega_l(A),\Omega _{k+l}(A))$. We denote by $\overline{\rho}$-Der$_{(k,\alpha)}^{\rm alg}\Omega^{*}(A)$ the space of all $\overline{\rho}$-algebraic derivations of degree $(k,\alpha)$ from $\Omega^{*}(A)$. Since $D$ is a $\overline{\rho}$-derivation, $D$ has the following expression on the product of 1-forms $\omega_i\in \Omega
_{\left| \omega_i\right|}^1(A)$: $$\begin{aligned}
D(\omega_1\wedge \omega_2\wedge\cdots \wedge \omega _k) &=
\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{k} \overline{\rho} \left(|D|, \left(i - 1, \sum\limits_{j = 1}^{i - 1}
|\omega_{i}| \right)\right)\\[.2pc]
&\quad\ \times \omega_1\wedge\cdots \wedge \omega_{i-1}\wedge D(\omega_i)
\wedge \cdots \wedge \omega_k\end{aligned}$$ and the derivation $D$ is uniquely determined by its restriction on $\Omega^1(A)$, $$K := D|_{\Omega_1(A)} \in \hbox{Hom}_\alpha (\Omega_1(A),
\Omega_{k+1}(A)).$$ We write $D=j(K)=j_K$ to express this dependence. Note that $j_K
(\omega) = K(\omega)$ for $\omega \in \Omega_1(A)$. Next we will use the following notations: $$\begin{aligned}
\Omega_{(k,\alpha)}^1 = \Omega_{(k,\alpha)}^1(A) &:= \hbox{Hom}_\alpha
(\Omega_1(A),\Omega _k(A)),\\[.2pc]
\Omega _{*}^1 = \Omega _{*}^1(A) &= \mathop{\oplus}\limits_{k\geq
0,\alpha \in G} \Omega _{(k,\alpha)}^1(A).\end{aligned}$$
Elements of the space $\Omega _{(k\alpha)}^1$ will be called [*field*]{}-[*valued*]{} $(k,\alpha)$-[*forms*]{}.
### *Nijenhuis bracket:*
The map -[Der]{}$_{(k,\alpha)}^{\rm alg}\Omega ^{\ast }(A)$[,]{} $K\mapsto j_{K}$ defined by $$\begin{aligned}
&j_{K}(\omega _{1}\wedge \omega _{2}\wedge\cdots \wedge \omega _{k})\\[.2pc]
&\quad\ = \sum_{i=1}^{k} \overline{\rho }
\left((k+1,\alpha), \left(i -1, \sum_{j=1}^{i-1} |\omega
_{i}| \right) \right)\\
&\qquad \ \ \times \omega _{1} \wedge\cdots \wedge \omega _{i-1}\wedge
j_{K}(\omega _{i})\wedge\cdots \wedge \omega _{k}\end{aligned}$$ is an isomorphism and satisfies the following properties[:]{}
1. $j_K{\rm :}\ \Omega _{(n,\beta)}(A)\rightarrow \Omega
_{(n+k,\alpha +\beta)}(A)$.
2. $j_K(\omega \wedge \theta)=j_K\omega \wedge \theta +\overline{\rho}
((k,\alpha),(n,\beta))\omega \wedge j_K\theta$ for any $\theta \in
\Omega_\beta^n(A)$.
3. $j_K(a)=0$ and $j_K(\omega)=K(\omega)$ for any $\omega \in \Omega
^1(A)$.
The module of $\overline{\rho}$-algebraic derivations is obviously closed with respect to the $\overline{\rho}$-commutator of derivations.
Therefore we get a $\overline{\rho}$-Lie algebra structure on $$\mathcal{N}_{ij}(A)= \mathop{\oplus}\limits_{(k,\alpha)\in \overline{G}}
\overline{ \rho}\hbox{-Der}_{(k,\alpha)}^{\rm alg} \Omega^{\ast}(A)$$ which is called the [*Nijenhuis algebra*]{} of the $\rho$-algebra $A$ and its bracket is the $\overline{\rho}$-[*Nijenhuis*]{} [*bracket*]{}.
By definition, the Nijenhuis bracket of the elements $K\in\,$ Hom $_{\alpha}(\Omega ^{1}(A),\Omega ^{1+k}(A))$ and $L\in\,$ Hom$_{\beta
}(\Omega^{1}(A),\Omega ^{1+l}(A))$ is given by the formula $$\lbrack K,L]^{\Delta }=j_{K}\circ L-\overline{\rho }((k,\alpha),
(l,\beta))j_{L}\circ K$$ or $$\lbrack K,L]^{\Delta }(\omega)=j_{K}(L(\omega))-(-1)^{kl}\varphi
^{-l}(\alpha)\varphi ^{k}(\alpha)\rho (\alpha,\beta)j_{L}K(\omega)
\label{14}$$ for all $\omega \in \Omega ^{1}(A).$
### *The Frölicher–Nijenhuis bracket:*
The exterior derivative $d$ is an element of $\overline{\rho}$-Der$
_{(1,0)}\Omega ^{*}(A)$. In the view of the formula $\mathcal{L}_X=[j_X,d]$ for fields $X$ we define $K\in \Omega
_{(k,\alpha)}^1(A)$ the Lie derivation $\mathcal{L}_K=\mathcal{L}(K)\in
\overline{\rho}$-[Der]{}$ _{(k,\alpha)}\Omega^{*}(A)$ by $\mathcal{L}_K:=[j_K,d]$. Then the mapping -Der $\Omega (A)$ is injective by the universal property of $\Omega ^1(A)$, since $\mathcal{L}
_K(a)=j_K(da)=K(da)$ for $a\in A$.
For any $\overline{\rho}$-derivation $D\in \overline{\rho}$-[Der]{}$
_{(k,\alpha)}\Omega ^{*}(A)$[,]{} there are unique homomorphisms $\Omega
_{(k,\alpha)}^1(A)$ and $L\in \Omega _{(k+1,\alpha)}^1(A)$ such that $$D=\mathcal{L}_K+j_L.$$ We have $L=0$ if and only if $[D,d]=0$. $D$ is algebraic if and only if $K=0$.
The map is a $\rho$-derivation of degree $\alpha$ so has the form $K \circ\ d$ for an unique $K\in \Omega _{(k,\alpha)}^1(A)$. The defining equation for $K$ is $D(a)-j_Kda = \mathcal{L}_K(a)$ for $a\in
A$. Thus $D-\mathcal{L}_K$ is an algebraic derivation, so $D-\mathcal{L}_K=j_L$ for an unique $L\in \Omega _{(k+1,\alpha)}^1(A)$.
By the Jacobi identity, we have $$0=[j_K,[d,d]]=[[j_K,d],d]+\overline{\rho }((k,\alpha),(1,0))[d,[j_K,d]]$$ so $2[\mathcal{L}_K,d]=0$. It follows that $[D,d]=[j_L,d]=\mathcal{L}_L$ and using the injectivity of $\mathcal{L}$ results that $L=0$.$\Box$
Let $K\in \Omega _{(k,\alpha)}^{1}(A)$ and $L\in \Omega _{(l,\beta
)}^{1}(A)$. Definition of the $\overline{\rho}$-Lie derivation results in $[[\mathcal{L}_{K},\mathcal{L}_{L}],d]=0$ and using the previous theorem results that is a unique element which is denoted by $[K,L]\in \Omega_{(k+l,\alpha +\beta)}^{1}(A)$ such that $$\lbrack \mathcal{L}_{K},\mathcal{L}_{L}]=\mathcal{L}_{[K,L]}$$ and this element will be the denoted by the abstract Frölicher–Nijenhuis of $K$ and $L$.
The space $\Omega_{\ast }^{1}(A) = {\oplus}_{(k,\alpha)\in \overline{G}}
\Omega _{(k,\alpha)}^{1}(A)$ with the usual grading and the Frölicher–Nijenhuis is a $\overline{G}$-graded Lie algebra. -[Der]{} $\Omega (A)$ is an injective homomorphism of $\overline{G}$-graded Lie algebras. For fields in [Hom]{}$_{A}^{A}(\Omega^{1}(A),A)$ the Frölicher–Nijenhuis coincides with the bracket defined in $(\ref{12})$.
*Naturality of the Frölicher–Nijenhuis bracket*
-----------------------------------------------
Let be an homomorphism of degree 0 between the $G$-graded $\rho$-algebras $A$ and $B$. Two forms $K\in \Omega
_{(k,\alpha)}^{1}(A)=$ Hom$_{\alpha }(\Omega _{1}(A),\Omega _{k}(A))$ and $K^{\prime }\in \Omega _{(k,\alpha)}^{1}(B)=$ Hom$_{\alpha}$ $(\Omega
_{1}(B)$, $\Omega _{k}(B))$ are $f$-[*related*]{} or $f$-[*dependent*]{} if we have $$K^{\prime }\circ \Omega ^{1}(f)=\Omega _{k}(f)\circ K\hbox{:}\ \Omega
_{\alpha }^{1}(A)\rightarrow \Omega _{\alpha }^{k}(B)$$ where is the homomorphism from (\[11\]) induced by $f$.
$\left.\right.$
1. If $K$ and $K^{\prime}$ are $f$-related as above then $j_{K^{\prime
}}\circ \Omega (f)=\Omega (f)\circ j_K{\rm :}\ \Omega (A)\rightarrow
\Omega (B)$.
2. If $j_K\circ \Omega (f)|_{d(A)}=\Omega (f)\circ j_K|_{d(A)}$[,]{} then $K$ and $K^{\prime}$ are $f$-related[,]{} where $d(A)\subset
\Omega ^1(A)$ is the space of exact $1$-forms.
3. If $K_j$ and $K_j^{\prime }$ are $f$-related for $j=1,2$ then $j_{K_1}\circ K_2$ and $j_{K_1^{\prime }}\circ K_2^{\prime }$ are $f$-related and also $[K_1,K_2]^\Delta,
[K_1^{\prime},K_2^{\prime}]^\Delta$ are $f$-related.
4. If $K$ and $K^{\prime}$ are $f$-related then $\mathcal{L}_{K^{\prime }}\circ \Omega (f)=\Omega (f)\circ \mathcal{L}
_K{\rm :}\ \Omega (A)\rightarrow \Omega (B)$.
5. If $\mathcal{L}_{K^{\prime }}\circ \Omega (f)|_{\Omega _0(A)}=\Omega
(f)\circ \mathcal{L}_K|_{\Omega _0(A)\text{ }}$ then $K$ and $K^{\prime}$ are $f$-related.
6. If $K_{j}$ and $K_{j}^{\prime }$ are $f$-related for $j=1,2$ then their Frölicher–Nijenhuis brackets $[K_{1},K_{2}]$ and $[K_{1}^{\prime}, K_{2}^{\prime }]$ are also $f$-related.
Acknowledgement {#acknowledgement .unnumbered}
===============
The author wishes to express his thanks to Prof. Gh. Pitiş for many valuable remarks and for a very fruitful and exciting collaboration.
[99]{} Bongaarts P J M and Pijls H G J, Almost commutative algebra and differential calculus on the quantum hyperplane, [*J. Math. Phys.*]{} [**35(2)**]{} (1994) 959–970
Cap A, Kriegl A, Michor P W and Vanzura J, The Frölicher–Nijenhuis bracket in non-commutative differential geometry, [*Acta Math. Univ. Comenianae*]{} [**62(1)**]{} (1993) 17–49
Ciupală C, Linear connections on almost commutative algebras, [*Acta Math. Univ. Comenianae*]{} [**72(2)**]{} (2003) 197–207
Ciupală C, Connections and distributions on quantum hyperplane, [*Czech. J. Phys.*]{} [**54(8)**]{} (2004) 821–832
Ciupală C, $\rho$-Differential calculi and linear connections on matrix algebra, to appear in [*Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys.*]{} [**1(6)**]{} (2004) 847–861
Dubois-Violette M and Michor P, More on the Frölicher–Nijenhuis bracket in non-commutative differential geometry. [*J. Pure Appl. Algebra.*]{} [**121**]{} (1997) 107–135
Lychagin V, Colour calculus and colour quantizations, [*Acta Appl. Math.*]{} [**41**]{} (1995) 193–226
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
address:
- |
Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron (DESY),\
Notkestrasse 85,\
D-22607 Hamburg, Germany\
E-mail: [email protected]
- |
Institut f[ü]{}r Theoretische Physik der Universit[ä]{}t Heidelberg,\
Philosophenweg 16,\
D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany\
E-mail: [email protected]
author:
- 'F. SCHREMPP'
- 'A. UTERMANN'
title: 'Instanton-driven Gluon Saturation'
---
Lepton-nucleon scattering at small Bjorken-$x$ uncovers a novel regime of QCD, where the coupling $\alpha_{\rm s}$ is (still) small, but the parton densities are so large that conventional perturbation theory ceases to be applicable. In general, one expects non-linear corrections to the evolution equations [@gribovnu] to arise and to become significant in this regime, potentially taming the growth of the gluon distribution towards a “saturating” behaviour. Much interest has recently been generated through association of the saturation phenomenon with a multiparticle quantum state of high occupation numbers, the “Colour Glass Condensate” that correspondingly, can be viewed [@cgc] as a strong [*classical*]{} colour field $\propto 1/\sqrt{\alpha_{\rm s}}$.
In this contribution, we shall briefly summarize our results on the interesting possibility of instanton-driven saturation at small Bjorken-$x$. Being extended non-perturbative and topologically non-trivial fluctuations of the gluon field, instantons [@bpst] ($I$) represent a fundamental [*non-perturbative*]{} aspect of QCD. Notably, the functional form of the instanton gauge field $A_\mu^{(I)}$ is explicitely known and its strength is $\propto
1/\sqrt{\alpha_{\rm s}}$, just as needed. In addition, we shall summarize why an identification of the “Colour Glass Condensate” with the QCD-sphaleron state appears very suggestive [@su2; @su3]. From $I$-perturbation theory we learned, that the instanton contribution tends to strongly increase towards the softer regime [@rs1; @mrs; @rs2; @qcdins], were saturation effects are expected to occur. Our results crucially rely on non-perturbative information from high-quality lattice simulations [@ukqcd; @rs-lat; @rs3]. For related approaches associating instantons with high-energy scattering, see Refs. . Instantons in the context of small-$x$ saturation have also been studied recently by Shuryak and Zahed [@shuryak3], with conclusions differing in part from those of our preceeding work [@fs; @su1; @su2; @su3]. Their main emphasis rests on Wilson loop scattering, and lattice information was not used in their approach.
An investigation of saturation in $\gamma^\ast P$ scattering becomes most transparent in the colour-dipole picture [@dipole]. At high energies, the lifetime of the $q\overline{q}$-dipole, into which the incoming $\gamma^\ast$ fluctuates, is much longer than the interaction time between this $q\overline{q}$-pair and the hadron. For small ${x_{\rm Bj}}$, this gives rise to the familiar factorized expression of the inclusive photon-proton cross sections, $$\sigma_{L,T}({x_{\rm Bj}},Q^2)
=\int_0^1 d z \int d^2{\mathbf{r}}\; |\Psi_{L,T}(z,r)|^2\,\sigma_{\mbox{\tiny DP}}(r,\ldots)\,.
\label{dipole-cross}$$ Here, $|\Psi_{L,T}(z,r)|^2$ denotes the modulus squared of the (light-cone) wave function of the virtual photon, calculable in pQCD, and $\sigma_{\mbox{\tiny DP}}(r,\ldots)$ is the $q\overline{q}$-dipole-nucleon cross section. The variables are the transverse $(q\overline{q})$-size $\mathbf r $ and the photon’s longitudinal momentum fraction $z$ carried by the quark. The dipole cross section includes the main non-perturbative contributions. Within pQCD [@dipole; @dipole-pqcd], $\sigma_{\mbox{\tiny DP}}$ is known to vanish with the area $\pi r^2$ of the $q\overline{q}$-dipole. Besides this phenomenon of “colour transparency” for small $r=|{\mathbf{r}}|$, the dipole cross section is expected to saturate towards a constant, once the $q\overline{q}$-separation $r$ exceeds a certain saturation scale $r_s$.
In our study, the question is: Can background instantons of size $\sim\langle\rho\rangle$ give rise to a saturating form ${\sigma_\text{\tiny DP}}^{(I)}(r,\ldots)\propto
\langle\rho\rangle^2$ for $r{\mbox{\,\raisebox{.3ex}
{$>$}$\!\!\!\!\!$\raisebox{-.9ex}{$\sim$}}\,}\langle\rho\rangle$? Our strategy was to start from $I$-perturbation theory [@mrs; @rs2] in DIS, and then to achieve the desired continuation to the saturation regime with the crucial help of lattice data[@ukqcd; @rs-lat]. In a complementary approach, we have considered the semi-classical, non-abelian eikonal approximation. It results in the identification of the dipole with a Wilson loop, scattering in the non-perturbative colour field of the proton. The field $A_\mu^{(I)}\propto 1/\sqrt{\alpha_{\rm s}}$ due to background instantons was studied as a concrete example, leading to results in qualitative agreement with the first approach. Due to the limitation of space, we focus on the first approach only and refer to Refs. [@su3; @su4] for the second one.
Let us first consider briefly the simplest (idealized) $I$-induced process, , with one flavour only and no final-state gluons. More details may be found in Ref. [@su2]. Already this simplest case illustrates transparently that in the presence of a background instanton, the dipole cross section indeed saturates with a saturation scale of the order of the average $I$-size ${\langle\rho\rangle}$. We start by recalling the results for the total $\gamma^\ast N$ cross section within $I$-perturbation theory from Ref. [@mrs], $$\begin{aligned}
\sigma_{L,T}({x_{\rm Bj}},Q^2)&=&
\int\limits^1_{{x_{\rm Bj}}} \frac{d x}{x}\left(\frac{{x_{\rm Bj}}}{
x}\right)G\left(\frac{{x_{\rm Bj}}}{x},\mu^2\right)\int d \, t\; \frac{d\,
\hat{\sigma}_{L,T}^{\gamma^* g}(x,t,Q^2)}{d\, t};\,\label{general}\\[1ex]
\frac{d\hat{\sigma}_{L}^{\gamma^* g}}{d t}&=&\frac{\pi^7}{2}
\frac{e_q^2}{Q^2}\frac{\alpha_{\rm em}}{\alpha_{\rm
s}}\left[x(1-x)\sqrt{t u}\, \frac{\mathcal{R}(\sqrt{-
t})-\mathcal{R}(Q)}{t+Q^2}-(t\leftrightarrow u)\right]^{\,2}, \label{mrs}\end{aligned}$$ with a similar expression for $d\,\hat{\sigma}_{T}^{\gamma^\ast\,g}/d\,t$. Here, $G\left({x_{\rm Bj}},\mu^2\right)$ denotes the gluon density and $L,T$ refers to longitudinal and transverse photons, respectively. Note that Eqs. (\[general\]), (\[mrs\]) involve the “master” integral $\mathcal{R}(\mathcal{Q})$ with dimension of a length, $$\mathcal{R}(\mathcal{Q})=\int_0^{\infty} d\rho\;D(\rho)\rho^5(\mathcal{Q}\rho)\mbox{K}_1(\mathcal{Q}\rho).
\label{masterI}$$ In usual $I$-perturbation theory, the $\rho$-dependence of the $I$-size distribution $D(\rho)$ in Eq.(\[masterI\]) is known [@th] for sufficiently small $\rho$, $D(\rho)\approx
D_{I-{\rm pert}}(\rho) \propto \rho^{6-\frac{2}{3}n_f},$ the power law increase of which, leads to (unphysical) IR-divergencies from large-size instantons. However, for sufficiently large virtualities $\mathcal{Q}$ in DIS , the crucial factor $(\mathcal{Q}\rho)\,K_1(\mathcal{Q}\rho)\sim e^{-\mathcal{Q}\rho}$ exponentially suppresses large size instantons and theory holds, as shown first in Ref. [@mrs]. Replacing the $I$-size distribution in Eq. (\[masterI\]) with the one from the lattice $D_{\rm
lattice}(\rho)$ (see Fig. \[pic2\] (left)), this restriction will not be necessary anymore, whence $\mathcal{R}(0)=\int_0^{\infty}
d\rho\;D_{\rm lattice}(\rho)\rho^5\approx 0.3 \mbox{\ fm}$ becomes finite and a $\mathcal{Q}^2$ cut is no longer required.
By means of a change of variables and a subsequent $2d$-Fourier transformation, Eqs. (\[general\]), (\[mrs\]) may indeed be cast [@su2] into a colour-dipole form (\[dipole-cross\]). We obtain e.g. for the longitudinal case, using $\hat{Q}=\sqrt{z\,(1-z)}\,Q$, $$\begin{aligned}
\
\lefteqn{\left(\left|\Psi_L\right|^2\sigma_{\mbox{\tiny DP}}\right)^{(I)}
\approx\, \mid\Psi_L^{\rm pQCD}(z,r)\mid^{\,2}\,
\frac{1}{\alpha_{\rm s}}\,{x_{\rm Bj}}\,
G({x_{\rm Bj}},\mu^2)\,\frac{\pi^8}{12}}\label{resultL}\\[1ex]
&&\times\left\{\int_0^\infty\,d\rho
D(\rho)\,\rho^5\,\left(\frac{-\frac{d}{dr^2}\left(2 r^2
\frac{\mbox{K}_1(\hat{Q}\sqrt{r^2+\rho^2/z})}{\hat{Q}\sqrt{r^2+\rho^2/z}}
\right)}{{\rm K}_0(\hat{Q}r)}-(z\leftrightarrow 1-z)
\right)\right\}^2.\nonumber \end{aligned}$$ The strong peaking of $D_{\rm
lattice}(\rho)$ around , then implies $$\left(|\Psi_{L,T}|^{\,2}
\sigma_{\mbox{\tiny DP}}\right)^{(I)}\Rightarrow\left\{\begin{array}{llcl}
\mathcal{O}(1) \mbox{\rm \ but exponentially small};&r\rightarrow 0\,,\\[2ex]
\mid\Psi^{\rm \,pQCD}_{L,T}\mid^{\,2}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_{\rm
s}}\,{x_{\rm Bj}}\,G({x_{\rm Bj}},\mu^2)\,\frac{\pi^8}{12}\,\mathcal{R}(0)^2;
&\frac{r}{{\langle\rho\rangle}}{\mbox{\,\raisebox{.3ex}
{$>$}$\!\!\!\!\!$\raisebox{-.9ex}{$\sim$}}\,}1\, .\label{final}
\end{array}\right.$$ Hence, the association of the intrinsic instanton scale ${\langle\rho\rangle}$ with the saturation scale $r_s$ becomes apparent from Eqs. (\[resultL\]), (\[final\]): $\sigma_{\mbox{\tiny DP}}^{(I)}(r,\ldots)$ rises strongly as function of $r$ around $r_s\approx\langle\rho\rangle$, and indeed [*saturates*]{} for $r/{\langle\rho\rangle}>1$ towards a [*constant geometrical limit*]{}, proportional to the area $\pi\,\mathcal{R}(0)^2\, =\, \pi\left(\int_0^\infty\,d\rho\,D_{\rm
lattice}(\rho)\,\rho^5\right)^2$, subtended by the instanton. Since $\mathcal{R}(0)$ would be divergent within $I$-perturbation theory, the information about $D(\rho)$ from the lattice is crucial for the finiteness of the result.
Now we turn to the more realistic process with an arbitrary number of gluons and flavours in the final state, which causes a significant complication. On the other hand, it is due to the inclusion of final-state gluons that the identification of the QCD-sphaleron state with the colour glass condensate has emerged [@su2; @su3], with the qualitative “saturation” features remaining unchanged. Most of the $I$-dynamics resides in the $I$-induced $q^\ast(q^\prime)\,
g(p)$-subprocesses with an incoming off-mass-shell quark $q^\ast$ originating from photon dissociation. The important kinematical variables are the $I$-subprocess energy $E=\sqrt{(q^\prime+p)^2}$ and the quark virtuality $Q^{\prime\,2}=-q^{\prime\,2}$.
It is convenient to account for the final-state gluons by means of the so-called “$I\bar{I}$-valley method” [@yung]. It allows to achieve via the optical theorem an elegant summation over the gluons in form of an exponentiation, with the effect of the gluons residing entirely in the $I\bar{I}$-valley interaction The new collective coordinate $R_\mu$ denotes the $I\bar{I}$-distance, while the matrix $U$ characterizes the relative $I\bar{I}$-colour orientation. Most importantly, the functional form of $\Omega_\text{valley}^{I\bar{I}}$ is analytically known [@kr; @verbaarschot] (formally) for [*all*]{} values of $R^2/(\rho\bar{\rho})$.
Our strategy here is identical to the one for the “simplest process”: Starting point is the $\gamma^\ast N$ cross section, this time obtained by means of the $I\bar{I}$-valley method [@rs2]. The next step is a variable and Fourier transformation into the colour-dipole picture. The dipole cross section $\tilde{\sigma}^{(I),{\rm
gluons}}_{\mbox{\tiny DP}}({\mathbf{l}}^2,{x_{\rm Bj}},\ldots)$ before the final 2d-Fourier transformation ${\mathbf{l}}\leftrightarrow{\mathbf{r}}$ to the dipole size ${\mathbf{r}}$, arises simply as an energy integral over the $I$-induced total $q^\ast g$ cross section from Ref. [@rs2], $$\tilde{\sigma}^{(I),{\rm gluons}}_{\mbox{\tiny DP}} \approx
\frac{{x_{\rm Bj}}}{2}\,G({x_{\rm Bj}},\mu^2)\,\int_0^{E_{\rm max}}
\frac{d\,E}{E} \left[\frac{E^4}{(E^2+Q^{\,\prime 2})\,Q^{\,\prime 2}}\,
\sigma^{(I)}_{q^\ast \,g}\left(E,{\mathbf{l}}^2,\ldots\right)\right],
\label{sigdipglue}$$ involving in turn integrations over the $I\bar{I}$-collective coordinates $\rho,\bar{\rho},U$ and $R_\mu$.
In the softer regime of interest for saturation, we again substitute $D(\rho) = D_{\rm lattice}(\rho)$, which enforces $\rho\approx\bar{\rho}\approx
\langle\rho\rangle$ in the respective $\rho,\bar{\rho}$-integrals, while the integral over the $I\bar{I}$-distance $R$ is dominated by a [*saddle point*]{}, $$\frac{R}{{\langle\rho\rangle}} \approx {\rm
function}\left(\frac{E}{m_{\rm sph}}\right); \hspace{2ex} m_{\rm
sph}\approx \frac{3\pi}{4}\frac{1}{\alpha_{\rm s}\,{\langle\rho\rangle}} =\mathcal{O}({\rm
\,few\ GeV\,}).
\label{sphaleron1}$$ At this point, the mass $m_{\rm sph}$ of the QCD-sphaleron [@rs1; @diak-petrov], i.e the barrier height separating neighboring topologically inequivalent vacua, enters as the scale for the energy $E$. The saddle-point dominance implies a one-to-one relation, $$\frac{R}{{\langle\rho\rangle}} \Leftrightarrow \frac{E}{m_{\rm sph}}; \hspace{2ex}
\mbox{\rm with}\ R={\langle\rho\rangle}\Leftrightarrow E\approx m_{\rm sph}.
\label{sphaleron2}$$ Our continuation to the saturation regime now involves crucial lattice information about $\Omega^{I\bar{I}}$. The relevant lattice observable is the distribution of the $I\bar{I}$-distance [@rs-lat; @su2] $R$, providing information on $\left\langle\exp
[-\frac{4\pi}{\alpha_{\rm s}}\Omega^{I\bar{I}}]\right\rangle_{U,\rho,\bar{\rho}}$ in Euclidean space. Due to the crucial saddle-point relation (\[sphaleron1\]), (\[sphaleron2\]), we may replace the original variable $R/{\langle\rho\rangle}$ by $E/m_{\rm sph}$. A comparison of the respective $I\bar{I}$-valley predictions with the UKQCD lattice data [@ukqcd; @rs-lat; @su2] versus $E/m_{\rm sph}$ is displayed in Fig. \[pic2\] (middle). It reveals the important result that the $I\bar{I}$-valley approximation is quite reliable up to $E\approx
m_{\rm sph}$. Beyond this point a marked disagreement rapidly develops: While the lattice data show a [*sharp peak*]{} at $E\approx
m_{\rm sph}$, the valley prediction continues to rise indefinitely for $E{\mbox{\,\raisebox{.3ex}
{$>$}$\!\!\!\!\!$\raisebox{-.9ex}{$\sim$}}\,}m_{\rm sph}$! It is remarkable that an extensive recent and completely independent semiclassical numerical simulation [@rubakov] shows precisely the same trend for electroweak $B +L$-violation, as displayed in Fig. \[pic2\] (right).
It is again at hand to identify $\Omega^{I\bar{I}}=
\Omega^{I\bar{I}}_{\rm lattice}$ for $E{\mbox{\,\raisebox{.3ex}
{$>$}$\!\!\!\!\!$\raisebox{-.9ex}{$\sim$}}\,}m_{\rm sph}$. Then the integral over the $I$-subprocess energy spectrum (\[sigdipglue\]) in the dipole cross section appears to be dominated by the sphaleron configuration at $E\approx m_{\rm sph}$ The feature of saturation analogously to the “simplest process” in Sec. 3.1 then implies the announced identification of the colour glass condensate with the QCD-sphaleron state.
[99]{} L.V. Gribov, E.M. Levin and M.G. Ryskin, . E. Iancu, A. Leonidov and L. D. McLerran, . A. Belavin [*et al.*]{}, . F. Schrempp and A. Utermann, . F. Schrempp and A. Utermann, arXiv:hep-ph/0301177; arXiv:hep-ph/0401137. A. Ringwald and F. Schrempp, arXiv:hep-ph/9411217. S. Moch, A. Ringwald and F. Schrempp, . A. Ringwald and F. Schrempp, . A. Ringwald and F. Schrempp, . D.A. Smith and M.J. Teper (UKQCD), . A. Ringwald and F. Schrempp, . A. Ringwald and F. Schrempp, . D.E. Kharzeev, Y.V. Kovchegov and E. Levin, . E. Shuryak and I. Zahed, ;\
M. Nowak, E. Shuryak and I. Zahed, . E. Shuryak and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. D [**69**]{} (2004) 014011. F. Schrempp and A. Utermann, . F. Schrempp, . N. Nikolaev and B.G. Zakharov, ; ; A.H. Mueller, . F. E. Low, . F. Schrempp and A. Utermann, in preparation. G. ‘t Hooft, . A. Yung, . V.V. Khoze and A. Ringwald, . J. Verbaarschot, . D. Diakonov and V. Petrov, . F. Bezrukov [*et al.*]{}, . A. Ringwald, .
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We investigate the BCS pairing in a mixture of fermionic polar molecules with two different hyperfine states. We derive a set of coupled gap equations and find that this system supports both spin-singlet and -triplet BCS pairs. We also calculate the critical temperatures and the angular dependence of order parameters. In addition, by tuning short-range interaction between inter-species molecules, the transition between singlet and triplet paired states may be realized.'
author:
- 'T. Shi, J.-N. Zhang, C.-P. Sun, and S. Yi'
title: 'Singlet and triplet BCS pairs in a gas of two-species fermionic polar molecules'
---
[*Introduction*]{}. — There have been growing interests in studying the properties of dipolar Fermi gases since the experimental success in making high phase-space-density fermionic KRb gas [@ye1; @ye2]. Of particular interest is the anisotropy of electric dipole-dipole interaction (EDDI), whose partially attractive character provides a mechanism to form anisotropic BCS pair. You and Marinescu [@you] first realized that the $p$-wave paired BCS states could be achieved for fermionic atoms inside an external dc field. Baranov [*et al*]{}. further showed that the order parameter of a BCS pair is the superposition of all odd partial waves [@bara]. Subsequently, the critical temperature of the superfluid transition and its relation to the trap geometry were investigated [@bara]. In those studies, the Fermi surface (FS) of system was assumed to be a sphere. However, it was found via variational method that the Fock exchange interaction deformed the FS [@miya]. This result was also confirmed by both numerical [@ronen; @zhang] and perturbation calculations [@ronen; @chan]. Very recently, the role played by Fock exchange interaction in BCS pairing is studied [@pu].
All above mentioned theoretical work focus on the spinless dipolar fermions. Adding the spin degree of freedom, ultracold gas of polar molecules may offer even richer physics. When loaded into an optical lattice, spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ polar molecules can be used as a toolbox for lattice spin models [@zoller]. Furthermore, it was shown that a two-component dipolar Fermi gas may have a ferro-nematic ground state [@freg].
In the present work, we study the BCS pairing in a mixture of fermionic polar molecules with two different hyperfine states, $\sigma=\uparrow$ and $\downarrow$. The electric dipole moments $d$ of all molecules are orientated along $z$-axis such that the spin-independent EDDI becomes $V_{d}({\mathbf r})=C_dr^{-3}\left(1-\frac{3z^2}{r^2}\right)$ with $C_d=\frac{d^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}$. In addition, we assume that inter-species molecules also interact via short-range interaction $V_0({\mathbf r})=C_0\delta({\mathbf r})$, where $C_0=\frac{4\pi\hbar^2a_s}{m}$ with $a_s$ being the $s$-wave scattering length and $m$ the mass of the molecule. The total interaction potential $V=V_d+V_0$ conserves the number of particles in individual spin component. We show that novel [*spin-singlet even partial wave*]{} and [*spin-triplet odd partial wave*]{} pairs can appear in this system.
[*Gap equation*]{}. — We consider a homogeneous gas of two-species fermionic polar molecules with total number density $2n$. For simplicity, we assume that $n_\uparrow=n_\downarrow=n$. In momentum space, the second quantized Hamiltonian reads $$\begin{aligned}
H&=&\sum_{{\mathbf k}\sigma}\left(\frac{\hbar^2{\mathbf k}^{2}}{2m}-\mu\right) c_{{\mathbf k}\sigma}^{\dagger}c_{{\mathbf k}\sigma}\nonumber\\
&&+\frac{1}{2{\cal V}} \sum_{{\mathbf k}{\mathbf p}{\mathbf q},\sigma\sigma'} \widetilde V({\mathbf q})c_{{\mathbf k}+{\mathbf q}\,\sigma}^{\dagger }c_{{\mathbf p}-{\mathbf q}\,\sigma'}^{\dagger}c_{{\mathbf p}\sigma'}c_{{\mathbf k}\sigma}, \label{ham}\end{aligned}$$ where $\mu=\mu_\uparrow=\mu_\downarrow$ is the chemical potential, $\cal V$ is the volume of the system, and $\widetilde V=\widetilde V_d+\widetilde V_0$ is the Fourier transform of the interaction potential. One should keep in mind that, in Eq. (\[ham\]), contact interaction only exists between $\uparrow$ and $\downarrow$ molecules.
Under Hartree-Fork approximation, Eq. (\[ham\]) becomes $$\begin{aligned}
H\!=\!\sum_{{\mathbf k}\sigma}\varepsilon_{{\mathbf k}\sigma} c_{{\mathbf k}\sigma}^{\dagger} c_{{\mathbf k}\sigma}\!+\!\frac{1}{2}\sum_{{\mathbf k},\sigma\sigma'} \Delta_{\sigma\sigma'}(\mathbf k)c_{{\mathbf k}\sigma}^{\dagger} c_{-{\mathbf k}\sigma'}^{\dagger}+h.c.,\label{ham2}\end{aligned}$$ where the dispersion relation is $\varepsilon_{{\mathbf k}\sigma}=\frac{\hbar^2{\mathbf k}^{2}}{2m}-\varepsilon_F-\Sigma_\sigma({\mathbf k})$ with $\varepsilon_F\equiv\mu-nC_0=\frac{\hbar^2}{2M}(6\pi^2n)^{2/3}$ being the Fermi energy and $\Sigma_\sigma({\mathbf k})={\cal V}^{-1}\sum_{\mathbf q}\widetilde V_d({\mathbf k}-{\mathbf q})f_{{\mathbf q}\sigma}$ the self energy. To the lowest order, we choose the Fermi occupation number $f_{{\mathbf q}\sigma}=\left\langle c_{{\mathbf q}\sigma}^\dag c_{{\mathbf q}\sigma}\right\rangle$ to be that at zero temperature. As a result, dispersion relations become spin independent, denoted as $\varepsilon_{\mathbf k}$. The Fock exchange interaction deforms FS such that, in the vicinity of FS, $\varepsilon_{\mathbf k}$ can be approximately expressed as [@miya] $$\begin{aligned}
\bar\varepsilon_{{\mathbf k}}\simeq\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\left[\alpha^{-1}(k_{x}^{2}+k_{y}^{2})+\alpha
^{2}k_{z}^{2}\right]-\varepsilon_F, \label{disp}\end{aligned}$$ where $\alpha$ is the deformation parameter, which can be found using either variational [@miya] or numerical method [@ronen; @zhang]. Moreover, at the weak interaction limit $$\begin{aligned}
D\equiv nC_d/\varepsilon_F\ll1,\label{weak}\end{aligned}$$ the perturbation calculation yields $\alpha=1-\frac{2\pi}{3}D$ [@ronen; @chan], where $D$ dimensionless dipole interaction strength. We point out that, for all results presented in this work, $\alpha$ is obtained variationally.
The order parameters for the BCS states in the Hamiltonian (\[ham2\]) are defined as $$\begin{aligned}
\Delta_{\sigma\sigma'}({\mathbf k})={\cal V}^{-1}
\sum_{{\mathbf q}}\widetilde V({\mathbf k}-{\mathbf q})\left\langle c_{-{\mathbf q}\sigma'}c_{{\mathbf q}\sigma}\right\rangle.\label{gap}\end{aligned}$$ Using either Bogoliubov transformation [@he3] or the standard Green’s function method [@stat], we obtain $$\begin{aligned}
\left\langle c_{-{\mathbf q}\sigma'}c_{{\mathbf q}\sigma}\right\rangle =-\frac{\Delta_{\sigma\sigma'}({\mathbf q})}{2E_{{\mathbf q}\sigma}}\tanh \left(\frac{1}{2}\beta E_{{\mathbf q}\sigma}\right),\label{mean}\end{aligned}$$ where $E_{{\mathbf k}\sigma}=\sqrt{\varepsilon_{{\mathbf k}}^{2} +\sum_{\zeta}|\Delta_{\sigma\zeta}({\mathbf k})|^{2}}$ is the energy of single-particle excitation and $\beta=1/(k_BT)$ is the inverse temperature. Substituting Eq. (\[mean\]) into (\[gap\]), one find a set of self-consistent equations for order parameters $$\begin{aligned}
\Delta_{\sigma\sigma'}({\mathbf k})=-\!\int\! \frac{d{\mathbf q}}{(2\pi)^{3}}\widetilde V({\mathbf k}-{\mathbf q})
\frac{\tanh \left(\frac{1}{2}\beta E_{{\mathbf q}\sigma}\right)}{2E_{{\mathbf q}\sigma }}\Delta_{\sigma\sigma'}({\mathbf q}).\label{gap2}\end{aligned}$$ We note that the order parameters corresponding to different BCS paired states are coupled in above equations. Similar gap equations also appear in superfluid $^3$He system [@he3]. The integral in Eq. (\[gap2\]) formally diverges. To regularize the interaction, we follow the standard renormalization procedure [@bara], which, to the first Born approximation, leads to the gap equations $$\begin{aligned}
\Delta_{\sigma\sigma'}({\mathbf k})&=&-\int \frac{d{\mathbf q}}{(2\pi )^{3}}\widetilde V({\mathbf k}-{\mathbf q})\Delta_{\sigma\sigma'}({\mathbf q})\nonumber\\
&&\quad\times\left[\frac{\tanh\left(\frac{1}{2}\beta E_{{\mathbf q}\sigma}\right)}{2E_{{\mathbf q}\sigma}}-\frac{m}{\hbar^2 {\mathbf q}^{2}}\right]. \label{gap3}\end{aligned}$$ We emphasize that these equations are only valid in weak interaction regime Eq. (\[weak\]), as we have ignored the higher order contributions from the interaction.
[*Symmetries of the order parameters*]{}. — Up to now, we have expressed the order parameters ${\boldsymbol\Delta}=\left(\begin{array}{cc}
\Delta_{\uparrow\uparrow}&\Delta_{\uparrow\downarrow}\\
\Delta_{\downarrow\uparrow}&\Delta_{\downarrow\downarrow}
\end{array}\right)$ in the uncoupled spin space. While in the basis of coupled spin $\{|SM\rangle\}$, one will have singlet and triplet pairs corresponding to total spin $S=0$ and $1$, respectively. Singlet pairing requires the gap parameter to be antisymmetric such that ${\boldsymbol\Delta}_s=\Delta_si{\boldsymbol\sigma_2}=\left(\begin{array}{cc}
0&\Delta_s\\-\Delta_s&0 \end{array}\right)$, where ${\boldsymbol\sigma}_2$ is the second Pauli matrix. Obviously, $\Delta_s(-{\mathbf k})=\Delta_s({\mathbf k})$, and as we shall show, it is a superposition of even partial waves, i.e., $\Delta_s({\mathbf k})=\sum_{{\rm even}\;l}\Delta_{l}^{(s)}(k)Y_{l0}(\hat{\mathbf k})$.
Following the convention of $^3$He [@he3], we may define a vector ${\mathbf d}({\mathbf k})$ in spin space by combining three spin components ($M=0,\pm1$) of the triplet pair: ${\boldsymbol\Delta}_t=\sum_{\mu=1,2,3}d_\mu({\boldsymbol\sigma}_\mu i{\boldsymbol\sigma}_2)=\left(\begin{array}{cc}
-d_1+id_2&d_3\\d_3&d_1+id_2 \end{array}\right)$, where ${\boldsymbol\sigma}_\mu$ are Pauli matrices. It can be easily seen that $\Delta_{t,1}=\Delta_{\uparrow\uparrow}=-d_1+id_2$, $\Delta_{t,-1}=\Delta_{\downarrow\downarrow}=d_1+id_2$, and $\Delta_{t,0}=\Delta_{\uparrow\downarrow}=\Delta_{\downarrow\uparrow}=d_3$. In momentum space, $\Delta_{t,M}({\mathbf k})$ are superpositions of odd partial waves, i.e., $\Delta_{t,M}({\mathbf k})=\sum_{{\rm odd}\;l}\Delta_{M,l}^{(t)}(k)Y_{l0}(\hat{\mathbf k})$.
[*Spin-singlet pairing*]{}. — For deformed FS, we introduce rescaled momentum $\bar{\mathbf k}$ such that $\bar k_{x/y}=\alpha^{-1/2} k_{x/y}$ and $\bar k_{z}=\alpha k_{z}$. Moreover, we define $\xi_{\bar{\mathbf k}}\equiv\hbar^2\bar{\mathbf k}^2/(2M)-\varepsilon_F$, which allows us to rewrite the order parameter as $\Delta_s(\bar{\mathbf k})\equiv\Delta_{s} (\xi_{\bar{\mathbf k}},{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}})$ with ${\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}}=\bar{\mathbf k}/\bar{k}$ being an unit vector. Using the fact that pairing is mainly contributed by states near FS, we introduce a characteristic energy $\overline\omega_s$ (of the order of $\varepsilon_F$) to single out the contribution from $-\overline\omega_s\leq\xi_{\bar{\mathbf k}}\leq\overline\omega_s$ [@bara]. In weak coupling regime, we have $\overline\omega_s\gg|\Delta_s|,\,k_BT_c^{(s)}$. The value of $\overline\omega_s$ will be determined self-consistently. After some tedious calculations, we obtain from Eq. (\[gap3\]) that $$\begin{aligned}
&&\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\Delta_{s}(\xi_{\bar{\mathbf k}},{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}})=-\int \frac{d{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf q}}}{4\pi}W(T,{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf q}
}){\cal R}_s(\xi_{\bar{\mathbf k}},{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}};0,{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf q}})\nonumber\\
&&\!\!\!\!\times\Delta_{s}(0,{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf q}})+\frac{1}{2}\int \frac{d{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf q}}}{4\pi}\int_{-\varepsilon_F}^{\infty }d\xi_{\bar{\mathbf q}}\ln\left(\frac{\left|\xi_{\bar{\mathbf q}}\right| +\eta_{\bar{\mathbf q}}}{2\overline{\omega}_s}\right)\nonumber\\
&&\!\!\!\!\times\frac{d}{d|\xi_{\bar{\mathbf q}}|}{\cal R}_s(\xi_{\bar{\mathbf k}},{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}}; \xi_{\bar{\mathbf q}},{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf q}})\Delta_{s}(\xi_{\bar{\mathbf q}},{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf q}})\nonumber\\
&&\!\!\!\!-\frac{1}{2}\int\!\! \frac{d{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf q}}}{4\pi }\ln \frac{
|\varepsilon_F|}{\overline\omega_s}{\cal R}(\xi_{\bar{\mathbf k}},{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}};-\varepsilon_F,{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf q}})\Delta_s(-\varepsilon_F,{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf q}}),
\label{gaptc}\end{aligned}$$ where $W(T,{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf q}})=\int_{0}^{\overline\omega_s} d\xi_{\bar{\mathbf q}}\eta_{\bar{\mathbf q}}^{-1}\tanh[\eta_{\bar{\mathbf q}\sigma}/(2k_BT)]$ and $\eta_{\bar{\mathbf k}}=\sqrt{\xi_{\bar{\mathbf k}}^{2}+|
\Delta_{s}(0,{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}})|^{2}}$. Furthermore, the integration kernel takes the form $$\begin{aligned}
&&{\cal R}_s\left(\xi_{\bar{\mathbf k}},{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}}; \xi_{\bar{\mathbf q}},{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf q}}\right)=\frac{
m\bar{\mathbf q}}{2\pi ^{2}} \widetilde V({\mathbf k}-{\mathbf q})\nonumber\\
&&\qquad\times\left[ \frac{\eta_{\bar{\mathbf q}}}{E_{{\mathbf q}}}\frac{\tanh\left(\frac{1}{2}\beta E_{{\mathbf q}}\right)}{\tanh \left(\frac{1}{2}\beta \eta_{\bar{\mathbf q}}\right)}-\frac{
2M\eta_{\bar{\mathbf q}}}{{\mathbf q}^{2}\tanh \left(\frac{1}{2}\beta \eta_{\bar{\mathbf q}}\right)}\right].\nonumber\end{aligned}$$
Close to the critical temperature $T_{c}^{(s)}$, the gap goes to zero and $\eta_{
\bar{\mathbf q}}\rightarrow |\xi_{\bar{\mathbf q}}|$. For the first term in rhs of Eq. (\[gaptc\]), we have ${\cal C}\equiv W\left(T_c^{(s)},{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}}\right)=\ln \left[2e^{\gamma}\overline\omega_s/\left(\pi k_BT_{c}^{(s)}\right)\right]$ with $\gamma=0.5772$ being the Euler constant. In contrast, the last two terms in Eq. (\[gaptc\]) do not contain the large logarithm $\ln \left(\overline\omega_s/k_BT_{c}^{(s)}\right)$, indicating that they are only important for the preexponential factor in the expression of critical temperature [@bara]. For the purpose of determining $T_c^{(s)}$, they are neglected such that we find on FS $$\begin{aligned}
\Delta_{s}(0,{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}})=-{\cal C}\int \frac{d{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf q}}}{4\pi}{\cal R}_s(0,{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}};0,{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf q}})\Delta_{s}(0,{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf q}}), \label{eigen}\end{aligned}$$ which is essentially an eigenvalue equation of integral operator with kernel ${\cal R}_s(0,{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}};0,{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf q}})$. Finding the highest critical temperature is equivalent to finding the lowest negative eigenvalue of this eigenvalue equation. Even in case $\alpha\neq 1$, it can be shown that the eigenstates corresponding to lowest eigenvalue is independent of the azimuthal angle of ${\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}}$ [@bara]. This observation allows us to integrate over the azimuthal variable of Eq. (\[eigen\]) to obtain an eigenvalue equation $$\int_{-1}^{1}dy{\cal K}_{s}(x,y)\phi(y)=\lambda\phi(x),\label{gaptc2}$$ where $x=\cos\theta_{{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}}}$, $y=\cos\theta_{{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf q}}}$, and ${\cal K}_{s}(x,y)=\big[3l_\alpha(x,y)\,|x-y|-1\big] +k_{F}a_s/(\pi^2D)$ with $l_\alpha\equiv\left\{4\alpha ^{3}+(1-\alpha ^{3})[(x-y)^{2}-\alpha ^{3}(x+y)^{2}]\right\}^{-1/2}$ and $k_F=\sqrt{2M\varepsilon_F}/\hbar$ being the Fermi wave vector. Clearly, the first term in ${\cal K}_s$ originates from EDDI, while the second one corresponds to contact interaction.
![The $\alpha$ dependence of $\lambda_s$ for $k_Fa_s=0$ (solid line) and $\lambda_t$ (dashed line).[]{data-label="lmd"}](lambda.eps){width="2.4in"}
For singlet pairing, we focus on the subspace of the eigenstates with even parity, i.e., $\phi(x)=\phi(-x)$. Assuming that $\lambda_s$ is lowest eigenvalue of Eq. (\[gaptc2\]) corresponding to an even eigenstate $\phi_s(x)$, the critical temperature can then be expressed as $$k_BT_{c}^{(s)}=\frac{2e^{\gamma}\overline\omega_{s}}{\pi}\exp \left(-
\frac{1}{\pi D |\lambda_{s}|}\right).$$ In addition, at $T_c^{(s)}$, the order parameter on FS becomes $\Delta_s(0,{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}})=\Delta_{s0}\phi_s\left(\cos\theta_{{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}}}\right)$, where $\phi_s(\cos\theta_{{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}}})$ represents the angular dependence of the order parameter on FS.
If the Fock exchange interaction is ignored, we have exactly $\phi_{s}(x)=\mathcal{N}\cos\left(x\sqrt{3/|\lambda_{s}|}\right)$, where $\mathcal{N}$ is a normalization constant and $|\lambda_{s}|$ is the largest positive root of the equation $t\cos\sqrt{3/t}+(1+\frac{2k_{F}a_s}{\pi ^{2}D })\sqrt{t/3}\sin\sqrt{3/t}=0$. It can be shown that $\lambda_s$ ($<0$) is a decreasing function of $k_Fa_s/D$. For negative $k_Fa_s$, our result reduces to that for $s$-wave pairing when $D=0$. In case $\alpha\neq1$, $\lambda_s$ and $\phi_s$ can only be determined numerically. As shown in Fig. \[lmd\], $\lambda_s$ is an increasing of $\alpha$ for $k_Fa_s=0$, indicating that, in the absence of contact interaction, the Fock exchange interaction enhances singlet BCS pairing.
![(color online) (a) The $D$ dependence of $T_c^{(s)}$ for $k_Fa_s=0$ (solid line) and $-1$ (dashed line). (b) $T_c^{(s)}$ as a function of $k_Fa_s$ for $D=0.1$ (solid line) and $0.15$ (dashed line). (c) $\Delta_s(k_\rho,k_z)/\Delta_{s0}$ at critical temperature for $k_Fa_s=0$ and $D=0.01$, where $k_\rho=(k_x^2+k_y^2)^{1/2}$.[]{data-label="slt"}](singlet.eps){width="3.4in"}
Next, we compute the characteristic energy $\overline\omega_s$. Following the Gor’kov and Melik-Barkhudarov’s approach [@bara; @gm], we obtain $$\begin{aligned}
&&\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\ln \frac{\overline{\omega}_s}{\varepsilon_F}=\ln 0^{+}+\frac{1}{2\pi D \lambda_{\mathrm{s}}}\int \frac{d{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}}}{
4\pi }\int \frac{d{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf q}}}{4\pi }\phi_{s}({\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}})
\nonumber\\
&&\quad\times \int_{-\varepsilon_F}^{\infty }\frac{d\xi_{\bar{\mathbf q}}}{|\xi_{\bar{\mathbf q}}|}{\cal R}_{s}(0,{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}};\xi_{\bar{\mathbf q}},{\mathbf n}_{
\bar{\mathbf q}})\frac{\Delta_{s}(\xi_{\bar{\mathbf q}},{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf q}})}{\Delta_{0}},\label{omgb}\end{aligned}$$ where the order parameter, at $T_c^{(s)}$, satisfies the equation $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{\Delta_{s}(\xi_{\bar{\mathbf k}},{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}})}{\Delta _{s0}}\!\simeq\!
\frac{1}{\pi D \lambda_{s}}\!\int\!\! \frac{d{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf q}}}{4\pi }
{\cal R}_s(\xi_{\bar{\mathbf k}},{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}};0,{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf q}})\phi_{s}(\cos\theta_{\bar{\mathbf q}}).\label{order}\end{aligned}$$ $\overline\omega_s$ can be obtained by substituting Eq. (\[order\]) into (\[omgb\]). We remark that, in the rhs of Eq. (\[omgb\]), the second term also contains a divergent term which cancels the divergence from the first term. In general, $\overline\omega_s$ is a function of both $D$ and $k_Fa_s$, indicating that it also implicitly depends on $\alpha$. For simplicity, we use $\alpha=1$ to calculate $\overline\omega_s$, which yields $\overline\omega_s\simeq 0.36\varepsilon_F$ for $k_Fa_s=0$ and $\overline\omega_s\simeq 0.54\varepsilon_F$ for $D=0$. The latter is exactly the value for $s$-wave pairing.
In Fig. \[slt\] (a), we present the $D$ dependence of the critical temperature for singlet pairing. For $k_Fa_s=0$, only dipolar interaction is responsible for pairing, therefore, $T_c^{(s)}$ is a monotonically increasing function of $D$. However, for $k_Fa_s=-1$, $T_c^{(s)}(D)$ becomes a concave curve. This result suggests that even though both attractive contact interaction and dipolar interaction contribute to pairing, they also compete with each other. In fact, the deformed FS makes it difficult for contact interaction to form $s$-wave pairs, which is responsible for the drop of $T_c^{(s)}$ at small $D$. When dipolar interaction dominates, $T_c^{(s)}$ becomes a increasing function of $D$ again. We also verify that if the FS deformation is ignored, $T_c^{(s)}$ would always be increasing function of $D$. Figure \[slt\] (b) shows the $k_Fa_s$ dependence of $T_c^{(s)}$ for given $D$. As $\alpha$ is fixed by $D$, $T_c^{(s)}$ always increases as one increases the strength of contact interaction. In addition, when short-range interaction dominates, the one with smaller FS deformation (smaller $D$) will eventually has a higher critical temperature. Finally, the angular dependence of order parameter for spin-singlet pair at critical temperature is presented in Fig. \[slt\] (c).
[*Spin-triplet pairing*]{}. — At critical temperature, the order parameters for triplet pairs $\Delta_{t,M}$ are decoupled. In addition, they satisfy gap equations with exactly the same form. Therefore, we denote the triplet order parameter as $\Delta_t$. Since the critical temperature and order parameters can be obtained by following the same procedure as that for singlet pairing, here we shall only present our results.
![(color online) (a) The $D$ dependence of $T_c^{(t)}$. (b) $\Delta_t(k_\rho,k_z)/\Delta_{t0}$ at critical temperature for $D=0.01$[]{data-label="tlt"}](triplet.eps){width="3.4in"}
The critical temperature $T_c^{(t)}$ for triplet pairing can be expressed as $k_BT_{c}^{(t)}=\frac{2e^{\gamma}\overline\omega_{t}}{\pi }\exp\left(-\frac{1}{\pi D |\lambda_{t}|}\right)$, where $\lambda_t$ is the lowest eigenvalue of the equation $\int_{-1}^{1}dy{\cal K}_t(x,y)\phi (y)=\lambda\phi (x)$ in the subspace of the eigenstates with odd parity. The integration kernel is $
{\cal K}_{t}(x,y)=3l_\alpha(x,y)\,|x-y|-1$, which is essentially ${\cal K}_s$ with $k_Fa_s=0$. Assuming that the corresponding eigenstate of $\lambda_t$ is $\phi_t(x)$, the triplet order parameter on FS is $\Delta_t(0,\cos\theta_{{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}}})=\Delta_{t0}\phi_t(\cos\theta_{{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}}})$. The $\alpha$ dependence of $\lambda_t$ (Fig. \[lmd\]) indicates that the triplet pairing is also enhanced by the Fock exchange interaction.
![The dipolar interaction strength dependence of the critical scattering length.[]{data-label="phase"}](phase.eps){width="2.4in"}
The characteristic energy $\overline\omega_t$ and the triplet order parameter $\Delta_t(\xi_{\bar{\mathbf k}},{\mathbf n}_{\bar{\mathbf k}})/\Delta_{t0}$ at critical temperature satisfy similar equations as Eqs. (\[omgb\]) and (\[order\]), except for that ${\cal R}_s$ is now replaced by ${\cal R}_t$ which does not contain the contact interaction. In Fig. \[tlt\] (a), we plot the dipolar interaction strength dependence of the critical temperature $T_c^{(t)}$, where we have used $\overline\omega_t\simeq0.42\varepsilon_F$, the value corresponding to $\alpha=1$ case. The typical order parameter for triplet pair is plotted in Fig. \[tlt\] (b). We point out that in case the FS deformation is ignored, our results for triplet pairing reduce to those obtained by Baranov [*et al*]{}. [@bara].
[*Singlet versus triplet pairing*]{}. — For $k_Fa_s=0$, it can be seen from Fig. \[lmd\] that we always $|\lambda_s|<|\lambda_t|$; by further assuming $\alpha=1$, we also find that $\overline\omega_s<\overline\omega_t$. These results suggest that, without attractive contact interaction, the critical temperature for singlet pairing is always lower than that for triplet pairing. However, for $k_Fa_s<0$, $T_c^{(s)}$ increases as one increases the strength of short-range interaction such that beyond a threshold $k_Fa_s^*$, we have $T_c^{(s)}>T_c^{(t)}$. The critical $s$-wave scattering length is determined by equation $\pi D\ln \frac{\overline\omega_s(k_Fa_s^*)}{\overline\omega_t}= \frac{1}{\lambda_t}-\frac{1}{\lambda_s(k_Fa_s^*)}$, where we have explicitly expressed $\overline\omega_s$ and $\lambda_s$ as functions of $k_Fa_s$. In Fig. \[phase\], we present the $D$ dependence of the critical scattering length. We point out that when $T_c^{(s)}=T_c^{(t)}$, the singlet and triplet pairs may coexist in the system.
[*Conclusion*]{}. — We have studied the BCS pairing in a ultracold gas of two-species fermionic polar molecules. We show that there exist two types of BCS pairs: spin-singlet even partial wave and spin-triplet odd partial pairs. We calculate the critical temperatures and angular dependence of the order parameters. It is found that, without attractive contact interaction, the critical temperature for triplet pairing is always higher than that for singlet pairing. The opposite could also be true if one tunes the scattering length to a large negative value. Compared to the spin-triplet $p$-wave pairing in superfluid $^3$He, the spin-triplet (-singlet) pairing studied here couples all odd (even) partial waves. In addition, by carefully tuning the contact interaction, singlet and triplet pairs may coexist in this system. Armed with the rich experimental control mechanisms developed in cold atom physics, two-component fermionic polar molecules may provide an ideal platform for exploring new physics beyond what superfluid $^3$He could offer.
This work was supported by NSFC through grants 10974209 and 10935010 and by the National 973 program (Grant No. 2006CB921205). S.Y. acknowledges the support of the “Bairen" program of Chinese Academy of Sciences.
S. Ospelkaus [*et al*]{}., Nat. Phys. [**4**]{}, 622 (2008).
K.-K. Ni [*et al*]{}., Science [**322**]{}, 231 (2008).
L. You and M. Marinescu, Phys. Rev. A [**60**]{}, 2324 (1999).
M. A. Baranov [*et al*]{}., Phys. Rev. A [**66**]{}, 013606 (2002); M.A. Baranov [*et al*]{}., Phys. Rev. Lett. [**92**]{}, 250403 (2004); M. A. Baranov [*et al*]{}., Phys. Rev. Lett. [**94**]{}, 070404 (2005).
T. Miyakawa [*et al*]{}., Phys. Rev. A [**77**]{}, 061603 (2008).
S. Ronen and J. L. Bohn, arXiv:0906.3753 (2009).
J.-N. Zhang and S. Yi, arXiv:0907.2804 (2009).
C.-K. Chan [*et al*]{}., arXiv:0906.4403 (2009).
C. Zhao [*et al*]{}., unpublished.
A. Micheli [*et al*]{}., Nat. Phys. [**2**]{}, 341 (2006).
B. M. Fregoso and E. Fradkin, arXiv:0907.1345 (2009).
D. Vollhardt and P. Wölfle, [*The superfluid phases of Helium 3*]{} (Taylor & Francis, London, 1990).
See e.g. E. M. Lifshitz and L. P. Pitaevskii, [*Statistical Physics Part 2: Theory of the Condensed State*]{} (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1980).
L. P. Gor’kov and T.K. Melik-Barkhudarov, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 40, 1452 (1961) \[Sov. Phys. JETP 13, 1018 (1961)\].
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'An entanglement Rényi entropy for a spatial partition of a system is studied in conformal theories which admit a dual description in terms of an anti-de Sitter gravity. The divergent part of the Rényi entropy is computed in 4D conformal ${\cal N}=4$ super Yang-Mills theory at a weak coupling. This result is used to suggest a holographic formula which reproduces the Rényi entropy at least in the leading approximation. The holographic Rényi entropy is an invariant functional set on a codimension 2 minimal hypersurface in the bulk geometry. The bulk space does not depend on order $n$ of the Rényi entropy. The holographic Rényi entropy is a sum of local and non-local functionals multiplied by polynomials of $1/n$.'
---
D.V. Fursaev
[*Dubna International University\
Universitetskaya str. 19\
141 980, Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia\
and\
the Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics\
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research\
Dubna, Russia\
*]{}
Introduction
============
A holographic description of many-body systems, including quantum field and condensed matter theories, in terms of gravity theories one dimension higher is an active research area. One of the aims here is to get new insights in situations where traditional methods meet difficulties, in regimes of strong couplings, for a example.
Quantum entanglement is one of those notions which carries an information about strength of correlations in a system. If a quantum system specified by a density matrix $\hat{\rho}$ is divided spatially onto parts, $A$ and $B$, one can define a reduced density matrix, say, for the region $A$, $$\label{2.6}
\hat{{\rho}}_A=\mbox{Tr}_B \hat{\rho}~~,$$ by taking trace over the states located in the region $B$. To quantify the degree of entanglement one introduces the entanglement entropy $$\label{2.1}
S_A=-\mbox{Tr}_A \hat{{\rho}}_A\ln \hat{{\rho}}_A~~,$$ and the entanglement Rényi entropy of order $n$ $$\label{2.2}
S^{(n)}_A={\ln \mbox{Tr}_A \hat{{\rho}}^{~n}_A \over 1-n}~~,$$ where $n=2,3,...$. Formally $S_A=\lim_{n\to 1}S^{(n)}_A$.
In seminal papers [@Ryu:2006bv; @Ryu:2006ef] Ryu and Takayanagi suggested a “holographic formula” for calculation of entanglement entropy in conformal field theories (CFT) which admit a dual description in terms of anti-de Sitter (AdS) gravity. For a $d$ dimensional CFT spatially divided by a surface $\cal B$ the corresponding entropy of entanglement between the two parts is given by the Bekenstein-Hawking-like formula $$\label{1.1}
S(\tilde{\cal B})= {\mbox{vol}(\tilde{\cal B}) \over 4G_N^{(d+1)}}~~~.$$ Here $G_N^{(d+1)}$ is a gravitational constant in a dual gravity theory and $\mbox{vol}(\tilde{\cal B})$ is the volume of a certain codimension 2 hypersurface $\tilde{\cal B}$ lying in the bulk. The definition of $\tilde{\cal B}$ is a classical Plateau problem: $\tilde{\cal B}$ has the least volume among the codimension 2 hypersurfaces in the bulk whose asymptotic infinity belongs to a conformal class of $\cal B$. There are extra, topological, requirements [@Fursaev:2006ih] for the choice of $\tilde{\cal B}$ to distinguish between cases when the entropy corresponds to the reduced matrix $\hat{{\rho}}_A$ or $\hat{{\rho}}_B$.
Formula (\[1.1\]) passes non-trivial tests. It reproduces known explicit expressions obtained by direct computations in 2D and 4D CFT’s. Among recent interesting applications of (\[1.1\]) are works on critical phenomena [@Klebanov:2007ws], higher dimensional extensions of the $c$-theorems [@Hung:2011xb]-[@Myers:2010tj], boundary effects in entanglement entropy [@Takayanagi:2011zk] and many others, see [@Nishioka:2009un] for a general review, and [@Solodukhin:2011gn] for a possible role of entanglement in the origin of the entropy of black holes.
It is not much known about entanglement Rényi entropy (ERE) (\[2.2\]) in field theory models and about its holographic representation. An extensive analysis, mainly in 2D CFT’s, for two disjoint intervals was done in [@Headrick:2010zt]. In [@Casini:2010kt] the logarithmic part of ERE was obtained for a massless scalar field in Minkowsky space-time and spherical entangling surface $\cal B$. The idea of [@Casini:2010kt] is that in the given example the reduced density matrix $\hat{{\rho}}_A$, see (\[2.6\]), can be converted in a thermal density matrix. This method was applied in [@Klebanov:2011uf] to get ERE for free scalar and spinor fields in 3 dimensions. The same idea was used in [@Hung:2011nu] to calculate ERE in various holographic models.
The definition of a holographic ERE may require a smooth modification of the bulk geometry with dependence of the bulk metric on order $n$. This possibility was explored in [@Hung:2011nu] by identifying ERE in an effective thermal state in the boundary CFT with an entropy of a black hole in the bulk. In our work we study another option by assuming that the bulk geometry in the definition of the holographic ERE does not depend on $n$. We calculate leading terms of the entanglement Rényi entropy (\[2.2\]) and use this information to suggest a corresponding generalization of the Ryu-Takayanagi formula.
Our computations done in the limit of the weak coupling are summarized by the formula $$\label{1.2}
S^{(n)}({\cal B})\simeq \sum_{p=2}^{d-1}\Lambda^{d-p}{s^{(n)}_{~p} \over d-p}+s^{(n)}_{~d}\ln(\Lambda\mu)+...~~,$$ where $d$ is the dimensionality of the space-time (a boundary theory), $\Lambda$ is an ultraviolet cutoff, $\mu$ is a typical scale of the theory. The canonical mass dimensions of $\Lambda$ and $\mu$ are $+1$ and $-1$, respectively. We assume that the space and, consequently, ${\cal B}$ have no boundaries. One can show then that $s^{(n)}_{~p}=0$ for odd $p$.
Our result for 4D CFT (${\cal N}=4$ $SU(N)$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory) is that $s^{(n)}_{~2}$ is proportional to $\gamma_n A({\cal B})$, where $A({\cal B})$ is the area of ${\cal B}$ and $\gamma_n=n^{-1}$. The coefficient $s^{(n)}_{~4}$ is related to the conformal anomaly. It is a scale invariant functional of the following structure: $$\label{1.3}
s^{(n)}_{~4}=d(N)\left( a(\gamma_n)F_a+c(\gamma_n)F_c+b(\gamma_n)F_b\right)~~,$$ where $d(N)=N^2-1$, $F_a$ is related to the Euler characteristic of ${\cal B}$, $F_c$ is an integral of a projection of the Weyl tensor on ${\cal B}$, and $F_b$ is constructed solely of the extrinsic curvatures of ${\cal B}$. Coefficients $c(\gamma_n)$ and $a(\gamma_n)$ are 3d order polynomials of $\gamma_n$ which we compute by methods of the spectral geometry. Our method does not allow one to fix $b(\gamma_n)$.
It is the structure of Eqs. (\[1.2\]), (\[1.3\]) which motivates our suggestion of a holographic ERE. The main result here is formula (\[7.21\]) which reproduces (\[1.2\]), (\[1.3\]). The holographic ERE coincides with Ryu-Takayanagi formula (\[1.1\]) at $n=1$ but it has a more complicated structure, in general. The holographic Rényi entropy (\[7.21\]) in $d=4$ is an invariant functional set on a codimension 2 minimal hypersurface $\tilde{\cal B}$ in the bulk which does not depend on $n$. Similar to (\[1.3\]) the entropy functional is linear combination of polynomials related to $a(\gamma_n)$, $b(\gamma_n)$, $c(\gamma_n)$ and 4 different invariants. One of the invariants is $\mbox{vol}(\tilde{\cal B})$, two other are analogous to $F_c$ and $F_b$ and expressed with the help of curvatures in the bulk. The functional corresponding to $F_a$ is non-local logarithmic correction $\ln\mbox{vol}(\tilde{\cal B})$.
The work is organized as follows. Computations of the UV part of ERE in 2D and 4D CFT’s along with derivation of (\[1.2\]), (\[1.3\]) are presented in Sec. \[RCFT\]. The holographic entanglement Rényi entropy is suggested in Sec. \[HRE\]. Sec. \[spec\] contains a discussion of the results and concluding remarks. In particular, we speculate here on how the holographic formulas for ERE and for the entanglement entropy may appear in quantum gravity. The proposal of Sec. \[HRE\] is based on asymptotic behavior of different curvature invariants near the AdS boundary. Proofs of corresponding mathematical statements, some of which are new, are collected in Appendices. We show in Appendix B that the tilt angle of a minimal hypersurface $\tilde{\cal B}$ near a boundary of an asymptotically AdS space is determined by the extrinsic curvature of $\cal B$. This enables one to derive asymptotic embedding equations of $\tilde{\cal B}$ from pure geometrical considerations, see Appendix C.
Rényi entropy in conformal theories {#RCFT}
===================================
0
Basic definitions
-----------------
We consider a conformal field theory (CFT) set on a $(d-1)$-dimensional constant time hypersurface $\Sigma$. The spacetime is assumed to be static. The CFT density matrix $\hat{\rho}$ is chosen to be thermal, $\hat{\rho}=e^{-\hat{H}/T}/Z(T)$, where $T$ is the temperature, $\hat{H}$ is a Hamiltonian, and $Z(T)=\mbox{Tr}~\exp(-\hat{H}/T)$ is a partition function of the CFT.
It is convenient to introduce an ’entanglement partition function’ (EPF) associated to division of $\Sigma$ onto the parts $A$ and $B$ by a surface $\cal B$, $$\label{2.5}
Z(n,T)=\mbox{Tr}_A\left(\mbox{Tr}_B~e^{-\hat{H}/T}\right)^n~~,$$ where $n$ are natural numbers. At $n=1$ the two partition functions coincide, $Z(1,T)=Z(T)$. As follows from (\[2.6\]) and (\[2.5\]), the entanglement entropies can be expressed as $$\label{2.3}
S(T)=-\lim_{n \rightarrow 1}~ \left(n {\partial \over
\partial n}-1\right) \ln Z(n,T)~~~,$$ $$\label{2.4}
S^{(n)}(T)={1\over 1-n}\left(\ln Z(n,T)-n \ln Z(T)\right)~~.$$ In (\[2.3\]) one takes the limit $n \to 1$ by going from discrete to a continuous $n$. Arguments in support of this procedure can be found in [@Nesterov:2010yi]. We imply but omit in (\[2.5\]), (\[2.3\]), (\[2.4\]) the index $A$ (compare with (\[2.1\]), (\[2.2\])). The ground state EPF, $Z(n)$, can be obtained from $Z(n,T)$ in the limit $T\to 0$.
In a quantum field theory the partition function $Z(T)$ is represented as a functional integral over field configurations which live on a Euclidean static $d$ dimensional manifold ${\cal M}$ with the constant time sections $\Sigma$. The orbits of the Killing vector field generating translations in Euclidean time are the circles $S^1$ with the length equal $1/T$.
Analogously, $Z(n,T)$ can be written in terms of a path integral where field configurations are set on a ’replicated’ manifold ${\cal M}_n$ which is glued from $n$ copies (replicas) of $\cal M$ along some cuts which meet on $\cal B$. An explicit construction of ${\cal M}_n$ is described in [@Fursaev:2006ng]. For our purpose it is enough to know that ${\cal M}_n$ are locally identical to $\cal M$ but have nontrivial topologies: ${\cal M}_n$ have conical singularities on $\cal B$ with the length of a small unit circle around each point on $\cal B$ equal $2\pi n$.
The partition function in a free CFT, therefore, is $$\label{6.1}
-\ln Z(n)=\frac 12 \sum_i\eta_i\ln \det (\mu^2 \Delta^{(i)})~~,$$ where $\Delta^{(i)}$ are Laplace operators for different fields which enter the model, $\eta_i=+1$ for Bosons and $\eta_i=-1$ for Fermions, $\mu$ is a scale parameter. The base manifold for the Laplace operators is ${\cal M}_n$. Determinant of an operator $L$ can be defined, for example, by the Ray-Singer formula: $\ln \det L=-\zeta'(0;L)$ in terms of a first derivative of the zeta-function $\zeta(s;L)$ of $L$. For our purposes we use only scalar, spinor and vector Laplacians which are, respectively, $\Delta^{(0)}=-\nabla^2+\xi R$, $\Delta^{(1/2)}=(i\gamma^\mu\nabla_\mu)^2$, $(\Delta^{(1)})^\nu_\mu=-\nabla^2\delta^\nu_\mu+R^\nu_\mu$. Here $R$, $R^\nu_\mu$ are the scalar curvature and the Ricci tensor. Quantization of vector fields is done in the Lorentz gauge and produces a couple of ghost fields. The Laplacians $\Delta^{(0)}$ for ghosts have minimal coupling, $\xi=0$.
When the Laplace operators do not have zero eigenvalue modes the ultraviolet part of (\[6.1\]) is $$\label{6.2}
-\ln Z(n)\simeq \sum_{p=0}^{d-1}\Lambda^{d-p}~{A_{p}(n) \over p-d}-A_{d}(n)\ln(\Lambda\mu)~~,$$ $$\label{6.3}
A_p(n)\equiv \sum_i\eta_iA_p(\Delta^{(i)})~~,$$ where $A_p(\Delta^{(i)})$ are the heat coefficients that appear in short $t$ expansions for the corresponding heat kernel operators on ${\cal M}_n$, $$\label{6.4}
\mbox{Tr}~e^{-t\Delta^{(i)}}\simeq \sum_p A_p(\Delta^{(i)})~t^{(p-d)/2}~~.$$ If there are no boundaries $A_p(\Delta^{(i)})=0$ for odd $p$. The heat coefficients have been computed earlier by different authors. We give corresponding references and describe the coefficients more carefully in sec. \[4DCFT\], see Eqs. (\[6.17\]), (\[6.20\]). Equation (\[1.2\]) follows from (\[2.4\]), (\[6.2\]) if one puts $$\label{6.5}
s^{(n)}_{~p} ={nA_p(1)-A_p(n) \over n-1}~~.$$ The Ray-Singer definition takes into account only non-zero eigenvalues of an operator. Therefore, when a Laplace operator $\Delta^{(i)}$ has a certain number $N_{\mbox{\tiny{zm}}}^{(i)}$ of zero modes one should use in (\[6.2\]) a combination $A_d(\Delta^{(i)})-N_{\mbox{\tiny{zm}}}^{(i)}$. This results in the following modification of (\[6.5\]) for the partial entropy: $$\label{6.5a}
s^{(n)}_{~p=d} ={nA_d(1)-A_d(n) \over n-1}+s^{(n)}_{\mbox{\tiny{zm}}}~~,$$ $$\label{6.5b}
s^{(n)}_{\mbox{\tiny{zm}}} =-{nN_{\mbox{\tiny{zm}}}(1)-N_{\mbox{\tiny{zm}}}(n) \over n-1}~~,$$ $$\label{6.5c}
N_{\mbox{\tiny{zm}}}(n)=\sum_i\eta_iN_{\mbox{\tiny{zm}}}^{(i)}~~.$$ The simplest example is a Laplace operator on a compact 2D manifold $\cal M$. Such an operator on $\cal M$ and on the corresponding replicated spaces ${\cal M}_n$, which are compact as well, has a single normalizable zero mode. Hence $s^{(n)}_{~p=2}=-1$. In general, the number of zero modes (and so $s^{(n)}_{~p=d}$) may depend on the order $n$. In what follows we ignore effects of zero modes.
2D CFT
------
A simplest 2D CFT consists of some number of free spinor and minimally coupled scalar fields. The Rényi entropy is given by (\[1.2\]) for $d=2$. There is only a logarithmic term. From (\[6.5\]) one gets the known result [@Calabrese:2004eu] $$\label{6.6a}
s^{(n)}_{~2}={c \over 12}(1+\gamma_n){\cal A}({\cal B})~~,$$ where $c$ is the total number of fields (the sum of central charges), ${\cal A}({\cal B})$ is the number of points of ${\cal B}$ (for example, $A({\cal B})=2$ if ${\cal B}$ is an interval).
4D CFT {#4DCFT}
------
${\cal N}=4$ $SU(N)$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory in $d=4$ consists of 6 multiplets of conformally coupled scalar fields (with $\xi=1/6$), 4 multiplets of Weyl spinors, and 1 multiplet of gluon fields. Each multiplet is in adjoint representation of the $SU(N)$ group. Computations in the case of the zero coupling with the help of (\[6.5\]) yield $$\label{6.6}
s^{(n)}_{~2}={d(N) \over 4\pi}\gamma_n {\cal A}({\cal B})~~,$$ $$\label{6.8}
s^{(n)}_{~4}=d(N)\left(a(\gamma_n)F_a+c(\gamma_n)F_c+b(\gamma_n)F_b\right)~~,$$ where $d(N)=N^2-1$, $$\label{6.9}
F_a=-{1 \over 2\pi}\int_{{\cal B}}\sqrt{\sigma}d^2x~R({\cal B})=-2\chi~~,$$ and $\chi$ is the Euler characteristic of ${\cal B}$ (since ${\cal B}$ is closed and has topology of $S^2$, hence $\chi=2$), $a(\gamma_n)$ and $c(\gamma_n)$ are the following polynomials: $$\label{6.11}
a(\gamma_n)={1 \over 96}\left(\gamma_n^3+\gamma_n^2+7\gamma_n+15\right)~~,$$ $$\label{6.10}
c(\gamma_n)={1 \over 32}\left(\gamma_n^3+\gamma_n^2+3\gamma_n+3\right)~~.$$ The functional $F_c$ is determined in terms of a projection $C_{ijij}$ of the Weyl tensor $C_{\mu\nu\lambda\rho}$ at $\cal B$, $$\label{6.12}
F_c={1 \over 2\pi}\int_{{\cal B}}\sqrt{\sigma}d^2x~C_{ijij}~~,$$ $$\label{6.13}
C_{ijij}=C_{\mu\nu\lambda\rho}n_i^\mu n_j^\nu n_i^\lambda n_i^\rho~~.$$ $n_i$, $i=1,2$, are two unit mutually orthogonal outward pointing normal vectors to ${\cal B}$. The Weyl tensor is $$C_{\mu\nu\lambda\rho}=R_{\mu\nu\lambda\rho}+{1 \over d-2}\left(g_{\mu\rho}R_{\nu\lambda}
+g_{\nu\lambda}R_{\mu\rho}-g_{\mu\lambda}R_{\nu\rho}-g_{\nu\rho}R_{\mu\lambda}\right)$$ $$\label{6.14}
+{R \over (d-1)(d-2)}\left(g_{\mu\lambda}g_{\nu\rho}-g_{\mu\rho}g_{\nu\lambda}\right)~~,$$ where $R$, $R_{\mu\nu}$, $R_{\mu\nu\lambda\rho}$ are, respectively, the scalar curvature, the Ricci tensor and the Riemann tensor of $\cal M$. Finally, $$\label{6.15}
F_b={1 \over 2\pi}\int_{{\cal B}}\sqrt{\sigma}d^2x~\left({1 \over (d-2)} k_i^2-\mbox{Tr}(k_i^2)\right)~~,$$ where $(k_i)_{\mu\nu}=h_{\mu}^\lambda h_{\nu}^\rho (n_i)_{\mu;\nu}$ are extrinsic curvatures of $\cal B$, $k_i=g^{\mu\nu}(k_i)_{\mu\nu}$, $\mbox{Tr}(k_i^2)=(k_i)_{\mu\nu}(k_i)^{\mu\nu}$. Note that $d=4$ in (\[6.14\]), (\[6.15\]) for theories in 4 dimensions.
The functionals $F_c$, $F_b$ (and certainly $F_a$) are invariant under conformal transformations of the metric $$\label{6.16}
\bar{g}_{\mu\nu}(x)=e^{-2\omega(x)}g_{\mu\nu}(x)~~,~~\bar{n}_i^\mu=e^{\omega}n_i^\mu~~.$$ Conformal transformations are discussed in Appendix A. The conformal invariance is a consequence of the properties of the heat coefficients.
Coefficient functions $c(\gamma_n)$, $a(\gamma_n)$, $b(\gamma_n)$ are related to the contribution of conical singularities to the heat coefficients of Laplace type operators on singular base manifolds. The coefficients have the following structure: $$\label{6.17}
A_p(\Delta^{(i)})=nA_p(\Delta^{(i)})_{n=1}+\bar{A}_p(\Delta^{(i)})~~.$$ The term related to the presence of the conical singularities, $\bar{A}_p(\Delta^{(i)})$, is proportional to $(1-n)$ and can be written as $$\label{6.18}
\bar{A}_p(\Delta^{(i)})=(1-n)\eta_is^{(n)}_{~p,i}~~.$$ It follows from (\[6.18\]) that $s^{(n)}_{~p,i}$ is a contribution to the $p$-th term of the Rényi entropy from a particular field $$\label{6.19}
s^{(n)}_{~p} =\sum_i s^{(n)}_{~p,i}~~,$$ see (\[6.5\]). If the singular part of the heat coefficient is represented as $$\label{6.20}
\bar{A}_4(\Delta)=\bar{a}(\gamma_n)F_a+\bar{c}(\gamma_n)F_c+\bar{b}(\gamma_n)F_b$$ calculations in four dimensions yield for $\bar{a}(\gamma_n)$ and $\bar{c}(\gamma_n)$ the values which are summarized in Table \[t1\]. For a gauge boson the given result takes into account a contribution of ghosts. For the sake of clarity we also give the relation between coefficients defined in (\[6.11\]), (\[6.10\]) and coefficients from Table \[t1\] $$\label{rel1}
a(\gamma_n)={1 \over 1-n}(6\bar{a}_{0}(\gamma_n)
-4\bar{a}_{1/2}(\gamma_n)+\bar{a}_{1}(\gamma_n))~~,$$ $$\label{rel2}
c(\gamma_n)={1 \over 1-n}(6\bar{c}_{0}(\gamma_n)
-4\bar{c}_{1/2}(\gamma_n)+\bar{c}_{1}(\gamma_n))~~,$$ where indexes $0,1/2$ and $1$ correspond to scalar, Weyl spinor and vector fields, respectively.
Computations of coefficient $A_2$ for spin 1/2 and 1 can be found in [@Kabat:1995eq] and [@Fursaev:1996uz] (along with references to spin 0 results). Computations of $A_4$ can be found in different works: for spin 0 in [@Fursaev:1994], [@Dowker:1994bj], [@Dowker:1994nt], for spin 1/2 in [@Fursaev:1997th], and for spin 1 in [@DeNardo:1996kp]. Let us emphasize that all computations imply that conical singularities are located on a surface with vanishing extrinsic curvatures. Some information on the effect of the curvatures can be obtained from requirement that $A_4$ in conformal theories in $d=4$ is scale invariant, see, e.g. [@Fursaev:2011zz] for discussion of this property. As was pointed out in [@Dowker:1994bj], [@Dowker:1994nt] $A_4$ can be fixed up to adding some conformally invariant functional of extrinsic curvatures. This functional, $F_b$, is introduced in (\[6.15\]). It is a quadratic combination of the curvatures because $A_4$ has zero canonical mass dimension in $d=4$.
The coefficient $\bar{b}(\gamma_n)$ has not been derived so far by a direct computation. As we show later by using holographic arguments of [@Solodukhin:2008dh], $\bar{b}(\gamma_n=1)=1/4$. This means that function $\bar{b}(\gamma_n)$ may be non-trivial. It should be mentioned that, if $F_b=0$, formula (\[6.8\]) can be used with unknown $\bar{b}(\gamma_n)$ even in cases of non-vanishing extrinsic curvatures. An example is a spherical entangling surface in a theory in Minkowsky space-time. One can easily find corresponding ERE for this model in $d=4$ by using (\[6.18\]), (\[6.20\]) and results of Table \[t1\]. Here $F_a=-4$, $F_c=F_b=0$ and one finds, in particular, that $s^{(n)}_4=-(\gamma_n+1)(\gamma_n^2+1)/360$ for scalars, $s^{(n)}_4=-(\gamma_n+1)(7\gamma_n^2+37)/1440$ for Weyl spinors. Computations of the logarithmic ERE $s^{(n)}_4$ in this model have been done in [@Casini:2010kt],[@Klebanov:2011uf] by transforming the reduced density matrix to a thermal form. The results of [@Casini:2010kt],[@Klebanov:2011uf] completely agree with the result above.
As for ERE for the spherical entangling surface in the weakly coupled supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory the same computation yields $$\label{rel3}
S^{(n)}(R)\simeq d(N)\left[ {\Lambda^2 \over 8\pi n}{\cal A}-
{1 \over 48n^3}(15n^3+7n^2+n+1)\ln(\Lambda^2{\cal A})\right]~~,$$ where ${\cal A}=4\pi R^2$ is the area of the surface and $R$ is its radius. To write (\[rel3\]) we used (\[1.2\]), where the infrared cutoff parameter $\mu$ was replaced with the radius $R$. This result disagrees with a holographic computation of the same entropy in [@Hung:2011nu] where ERE was identified with the entropy of a black hole in the AdS gravity. The difference is in the dependence on $n$ (in [@Hung:2011nu] this dependence is not the ratio of polynomials). We return to discussion of this point in sec. \[spec\].
$\mbox{field}$ $\bar{c}(\gamma)$ $\bar{a}(\gamma)$ $c$ $a$
---------------------- ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ ----------------- ------------------
$\mbox{real scalar}$ ${\gamma^4-1 \over 480 \gamma}$ ${\gamma^4-1 \over 1440 \gamma}$ ${1 \over 120}$ ${1 \over 360}$
$\mbox{Weyl spinor}$ $-{7\gamma^4+10\gamma^2-17 \over 1920 \gamma}$ $-{7\gamma^4+30\gamma^2-37 \over 5760 \gamma}$ ${1 \over 40}$ ${11 \over 720}$
$\mbox{gauge Boson}$ ${\gamma^4+10\gamma^2-11 \over 240 \gamma}$ ${\gamma^4+30\gamma^2+60\gamma-91 \over 720 \gamma}$ ${1 \over 10}$ ${31 \over 180}$
: Coefficient functions of singular parts of the heat coefficients
\[t1\]
There is a relation of the functions $\bar{a}(\gamma_n)$, $\bar{c}(\gamma_n)$ to the conformal anomaly. The trace of the renormalized stress-energy tensor of the each field has the form $$\label{6.23}
\langle T^\mu_\mu \rangle=-a~E- c~ I~~,$$ $$\label{6.24}
E={1 \over 16\pi^2}\left(R_{\mu\nu\lambda\rho}R^{\mu\nu\lambda\rho}-4R_{\mu\nu}R^{\mu\nu}+R^2\right)~~,$$ $$\label{6.25}
I=-{1 \over 16\pi^2}C_{\mu\nu\lambda\rho}C^{\mu\nu\lambda\rho}~~.$$ Constants $a$ and $c$ are given in Table \[t1\] and one can check that $$\label{6.26}
c=\eta \partial_\gamma\bar{c}(\gamma=1)~~,~~a=\eta \partial_\gamma\bar{a}(\gamma=1)~~.$$ (As earlier, $\eta=+1$ for Bosons and $\eta=-1$ for Fermions.) On a regular manifold $A_4$ is composed of integrals of $E$ and $I$. Each of these integrals can be defined also on a singular manifold, if $|\gamma-1|$ is small and terms $O((\gamma-1)^2)$ are neglected, see [@Fursaev:1995ef]. Equation (\[6.26\]) follows from a property established first in [@Fursaev:1994ea] for scalar Laplacians with minimal coupling: up to terms proportional to $(\gamma-1)$ the coefficient $A_4$ in the heat trace asymptotic of a Laplace operator on a manifold with conical singularities coincides with the corresponding heat coefficient on a regular manifold obtained by ’smoothing’ conical singularities.
Relation of scaling properties of the entanglement entropy to the trace anomaly is discussed in [@Schwimmer:2008yh],[@Myers:2010tj].
![[]{data-label="F1"}](surf-B.eps){height="3cm" width="6.8cm"}
Toward a holographic description of the Rényi entropy {#HRE}
=====================================================
0
AdS gravity
-----------
The AdS/CFT conjecture [@Ma]–[@GKP] states that a supergravity theory in the anti-de Sitter (AdS) space is dual to a conformal field theory on the boundary of that region. Thus, we consider the $d+1$ dimensional gravity theory $$\label{7.1}
I[g]=-{1 \over 16\pi G_N^{(d+1)}}\int_{\tilde{\cal M}} d^{d+1}x\sqrt{g}
\left(\tilde{R}+{d(d-1) \over l^2}\right)~~~$$ with the negative cosmological constant $-d(d-1)/(2l^2)$. In what follows we put $l=1$, for simplicity.
Let $\tilde{\cal M}$ be a manifold with a metric $g_{KL}$ which is a solution to the Einstein equations in theory (\[7.1\]). Since $\tilde{\cal M}$ is asymptotically AdS $I[g]$ is not well defined. To avoid the volume divergencies of $I[g]$ one makes a cut of $\tilde{\cal M}$ at some $d$-dimensional hypersurface $\partial \tilde{\cal M}$. (We imply in (\[7.1\]) traditional boundary terms on $\partial \tilde{\cal M}$ but do not write them explicitly.) The cut of $\tilde{\cal M}$ is determined in suitably chosen coordinates by a fixed ’radius’ $\varrho$.
Let $\cal M$ be a $d$ dimensional manifold where a boundary CFT is defined on. The holographic relations require that metric induced on the boundary $\partial \tilde{\cal M}$ belongs to the conformal class of ${\cal M}$ in the limit of the infinite radius $\varrho$. The volume (infrared) divergences on the gravity side are identified with ultraviolet divergences in the CFT, that is $\varrho$ turns out to be related to a UV cutoff in the theory.
We denote scalar curvature, the Ricci tensor and the Riemann tensor of $\tilde{\cal M}$ by $\tilde{R}$, $\tilde{R}_{LP}$, $\tilde{R}_{LPKN}$, respectively.
Geometrical structures at AdS asymptotic
----------------------------------------
It is convenient to choose coordinates near $\partial \tilde{\cal M}$ in which the metric on $\tilde{\cal M}$ takes the form $$\label{7.1a}
ds^2=z^{-2}\left(dz^2 + g_{\mu\nu}(z,x)dx^\mu dx^\nu\right)~~.$$
By definition, the embedding equation of $\partial \tilde{\cal M}$ is $z=const$. The relation with the radius is $\varrho=1/z$. If (\[7.1a\]) is a solution to the bulk gravity equations the behavior of $g_{\mu\nu}(z,x)$ at small $z$ is known from the Fefferman-Graham asymptotic $$\label{7.2}
g_{\mu\nu}(z,x)=g_{\mu\nu}(x)+z^2g_{\mu\nu}^{(1)}(x)+...~~,$$ see e.g. [@Henningson:1998gx], where $$\label{7.3}
g_{\mu\nu}^{(1)}=-{1 \over d-2}\left(R_{\mu\nu}-{g_{\mu\nu} R \over 2(d-1)}\right)~~,$$ $g_{\mu\nu}(x)$ is a metric of $\cal M$, $R_{\mu\nu}$ and $R$ are curvatures of $\cal M$.
We assume that manifold $\cal M$ is static, so does the solution $\tilde {\cal M}$. The constant time section of $\tilde {\cal M}$ and its intersection with $\partial \tilde {\cal M}$ are denoted as $\tilde{\Sigma}$ and $\partial \tilde{\Sigma}$, respectively. Constant time section $\Sigma$ of $\cal M$ and $\partial \tilde{\Sigma}$ belong to the same conformal class.
We consider a minimal codimension 2 hypersurface $\tilde{\cal B}$ lying in a constant time section of $\tilde{\cal M}$. (The fact that the space is static implies that $\tilde{\cal B}$ is also minimal in $\tilde {\Sigma}$.) $\tilde{\cal B}$ ends on $\partial \tilde{\Sigma}$. It is required that the boundary $\partial \tilde {\cal B}$ of $\tilde{\cal B}$ is a surface conformal to the separating surface $\cal B$ in $\Sigma$.
Let $l,m$ be a pair of normal vectors to $\tilde {\cal B}$ such that $l^2=m^2=1$, $(l\cdot m)=0$. We choose direction of $l$ along a Killing field $\partial_\tau$ which generates time translations of the bulk manifold $\tilde {\cal M}$. (Let us emphasize that $\tau$ is a Euclidean time.) Once $l$ is chosen along $\partial_\tau$, $m$ is tangent to $\tilde{\Sigma}$. Position of $\tilde{\cal B}$ in $\tilde{\Sigma}$ is shown on Fig. \[F1\]. We also define 3 unit vectors $n,p,q$ at $\partial \tilde {\cal B}$ which are also tangent to $\tilde{\Sigma}$: $n$ is orthogonal to $\partial \tilde{\Sigma}$, $q$ is orthogonal to $\partial \tilde {\cal B}$ and tangent to $\tilde {\cal B}$, $p$ is orthogonal to $\partial \tilde {\cal B}$ and tangent to $\partial \tilde{\Sigma}$, see Fig. \[F1\].
We need asymptotic relations for the metric on $\tilde{\cal B}$ similar to (\[7.1a\]). Below we present a number of results, part of which are new. The details of computations can be found in Appendices B and C.
Since $\cal M$ is static $\cal B$ has a single non-trivial extrinsic curvature tensor in $\cal M$ which we denote $k_{\mu\nu}$. In general, $\tilde{\cal B}$ is tilted to $\partial \tilde{\Sigma}$. That is why there is a non-vanishing angle between vectors $m$ and $p$. If $\tilde{\cal B}$ is a minimal surface in asymptotically AdS space one finds (see Appendix B) the following asymptotic formula for the tilt angle: $$\label{7.6}
\varphi\simeq {z \over d-2}~k~~,$$ where $k$ is the trace of extrinsic curvature tensor $k_{\mu\nu}$ of $\cal B$. Surface $\tilde{\cal B}$ becomes orthogonal to $\partial \tilde{\Sigma}$ in the limit $z\to 0$.
The metric induced on $\tilde{\cal B}$ can be written in the form $$\label{7.7}
ds^2(\tilde{\cal B})={1 \over z^2}\left({dz^2 \over \cos^2\varphi}
+ \sigma_{ab}(z,y)dy^a dy^b\right)~~.$$ Let $y^a$, $a=1,...d-2$, be coordinates on $\cal B$, and $\sigma_{ab}(y)=x^\mu_{~,a} g_{\mu\nu}(x) x^\nu_{~,b}$ be the metric induced on $\cal B$ under embedding $x^\mu=x^\mu(y)$. One finds the following asymptotic formula: $$\label{7.8}
\sigma_{ab}(z,y)=\sigma_{ab}(y)-{z^2 \over d-2}\left(kk_{ab}+R_{ab}-{\sigma_{ab} \over 2(d-1)}R\right)+..,$$ where $R_{ab}=x^\mu_{~,a} x^\nu_{~,b} R_{\mu\nu}$, $k_{ab}=x^\mu_{~,a} x^\nu_{~,b} k_{\mu\nu}$, see Appendix C.
In $d=4$ $$\mbox{vol}(\tilde{\cal B})=\int_{\cal B}\sqrt{\sigma}d^2y\left[{1 \over 2\varepsilon^2}
+\frac 14 \ln {\mu \over \varepsilon}\left(-R({\cal B})+C_{ijij}+{k^2 \over 2} -
\mbox{Tr}(k^2) \right)+...\right]$$ $$\label{7.9}
={1 \over 2\varepsilon^2}A({\cal B})+{\pi \over 2}(F_a+F_c+F_b)\ln {\mu \over \varepsilon}+...
~~,$$ where $\mu$ has a meaning of an infrared cutoff. This result coincides with computations of [@Schwimmer:2008yh], see also [@Hung:2011xb].
Let us discuss invariant functionals on $\tilde{\cal B}$ which are integrals of curvature invariants. Since $\tilde{\cal M}$ is a solution to the bulk Einstein equations with the negative cosmological constant the scalar curvature and the Ricci tensor are known: $\tilde{R}=-(d+1)d$, $\tilde{R}_{LP}=-d g_{LP}$. These structures are fixed and are not related to geometrical characteristics of $\cal M$ and $\cal B$.
The other candidate is the Riemann tensor $\tilde{R}_{LPKN}$ of $\tilde{\cal M}$. In the asymptotic $\tilde{R}_{LPKN}\simeq -(g_{LK}g_{PN}-g_{LN}g_{PK})$ at $z\to 0$. One can also consider quantities connected with the geometry of $\tilde{\cal B}$. There are two such quantities: the scalar curvature $\tilde{R}_B$ and a quadratic combination of extrinsic curvature tensors of $\tilde{\cal B}$. Since $\tilde{\cal B}$ is static the single non-vanishing extrinsic curvature tensor $K_{LP}$ is defined for the normal vector $m$, see Fig. \[F1\]. $K_{LP}$ is traceless since $\tilde{\cal B}$ is minimal.
Thus, one has 3 possible invariants which behave at $z\to 0$ as follows: $$\label{7.12}
\tilde{R}_{rsrs}(z,y)\equiv 2\tilde{R}_{LPKN}l^L m^P l^K m^N=-2+z^2C_{ijij}(y)+...~~~,$$ $$\label{7.13}
\tilde{R}_B(z,y)=-(d-2)(d-1)+z^2\left(C_{ijij}(y)+{k^2 \over d-2} -\mbox{Tr}(k^2)\right)+...~~~,$$ $$\label{7.14}
\mbox{Tr} K^2=K_{LP}K^{LP}=-z^2\left({k^2 \over d-2} -\mbox{Tr}(k^2)\right)+...~~~,$$ see calculations in Appendix \[A-C\]. These asymptotics contain only conformally covariant structures: normal projection (\[6.13\]) of the Weyl tensor of $\cal M$ and combinations of extrinsic curvatures of $\cal B$, whose transformation properties are listed in Appendix A. The left hand sides of (\[7.12\])-(\[7.14\]) are invariant with respect to bulk diffeomorphisms which have a subgroup of so called Penrose-Brown-Henneaux (PBH) transformations [@Brown:1986nw] which preserve the gauge (\[7.1a\]). Since PBH transformations generate Weyl transformations of the metric on $\cal M$, only Weyl covariant structures appear on the right hand sides.
Note that invariants (\[7.12\])-(\[7.14\]) are not actually independent: $$\label{GC}
\tilde{R}_B-\tilde{R}+2\tilde{R}_{ss}
-\tilde{R}_{rsrs}-K^2+\mbox{Tr}(K^2)=0
~~.$$ Here $\tilde{R}_{ss}=(l^L l^P+m^L m^P)\tilde{R}_{LP}$ and $K=0$ in the considered case. This identity is the known Gauss-Codazzi equation.
Formulas (\[7.9\]), (\[7.13\]) were obtained in [@Schwimmer:2008yh] by using arguments based on properties of PBH transformations. We derive these and other relations straightforwardly in Appendix \[A-C\].
Holographic entanglement entropy
--------------------------------
It is instructive first to see how the geometrical structures above work to reproduce the entanglement entropy in 4D CFT. One uses the holographic formula (\[1.1\]), AdS/CFT dictionary which identifies the gravity coupling with the group parameter as $1/G_N^{(5)}=2N^2/\pi$ and finds the entanglement entropy in form (\[1.2\]) for the inverse order parameter $\gamma_n=1$. If the gravity cutoff is chosen as $\varepsilon = \Lambda^{-1}$ one gets relations $$\label{7.10}
s_2^{(1)}={N^2 \over 4\pi}~~,~~
s_4^{(1)}=N^2 \left(\frac 14 F_a+\frac 14 F_c+\frac 14 F_b\right)~~~,$$ which coincide exactly with (\[6.6\]), (\[6.8\]), (\[6.11\]), (\[6.10\]) at large $N$. If the extrinsic curvature is non-zero one can use (\[7.10\]) to guess the coefficient at the invariant $F_b$ which has not been computed on the CFT side so far. One finds $$\label{7.11}
b(\gamma_n=1)=1/4~~~.$$ This ‘holographic’ argument was first suggested in [@Solodukhin:2008dh].
Formula (\[7.10\]) for $s_4^{(1)}$ does not reproduce a possible contribution of zero modes $s^{(n=1)}_{\mbox{\tiny{zm}}}$, see (\[6.5a\]).
Holographic Rényi entropy
-------------------------
Our aim now is to find a holographic formula which would be able to reproduce Rényi entropy (\[1.2\]) with coefficients established in Sect. \[RCFT\]. To be more specific the holographic Rényi entropy $S(n,\tilde{\cal B})$ associated to an entangling surface $\cal B$ in the boundary CFT is considered to be a functional set on a codimension 2 minimal hypersurface $\tilde{\cal B}$ in $\tilde{\cal M}$. We conjecture that $S(n,\tilde{\cal B})$ is an invariant functional similar to (\[1.1\]) and is constructed from intrinsic and extrinsic geometrical structures of $\tilde{\cal B}$.
Let us emphasize that the bulk geometries $\tilde{\cal M}$, $\tilde{\cal B}$ are the same as in the Ryu-Takayanagi setup and they do not depend, therefore, on the order parameter $n$. It is the form of the functional which is allowed to contain $n$. This differs our approach from the recent conjecture of [@Hung:2011nu] where $n$ enters the metric of the bulk solutions.
The simplest case which illustrates our idea is the holographic formula for Rényi entropy of a 2D CFT. One can check that the following area functional: $$\label{7.21a}
S(n,\tilde{\cal B})\simeq {1 \over 4G_N^{(3)}}{\gamma_n+1\over 2} \mbox{vol}(\tilde{\cal B})$$ reproduces (\[6.6a\]) if we choose $c={3 \over 2G_N^{(3)}}$.
To discuss 4D CFT we should consider several invariant structures associated to $\tilde{\cal B}$, first of all, $\mbox{vol}(\tilde{\cal B})$ and integrals over $\tilde{\cal B}$ of local invariants constructed from curvatures. Let us define the following functionals: $$\label{7.15}
\tilde{F}_c={1 \over 2\pi}\int_{\tilde{\cal B}}\sqrt{\tilde{\sigma}}d^{3}y
\left[\tilde{R}_{rsrs}+2l^{-2}\right]~~~,$$ $$\label{7.16}
\tilde{F}_b=-{1 \over 2\pi}\int_{\tilde{\cal B}}\sqrt{\tilde{\sigma}} d^{3}y~\mbox{Tr} K^2~~~,$$ where we denoted a metric induced on $\tilde{\cal B}$ by $\tilde{\sigma}$ and restored explicit dependence on the AdS radius $l$. These quantities are ’holographic duals’ of functionals $F_c$ and $F_b$, see (\[6.12\]), (\[6.15\]), in a sense that $$\label{7.17}
\tilde{F}_c=F_c ~l\ln {\mu \over \varepsilon}+...~~~,$$ $$\label{7.18}
\tilde{F}_b=F_b ~l\ln {\mu \over \varepsilon}+...~~~.$$ These results follow directly from (\[7.12\]) and (\[7.14\]). Integral of the scalar curvature $\tilde{R}_B$ according to (\[7.13\]) is reduced to a combination of $F_c$ and $F_b$. There is no need to consider this integral independently since it can be expressed in terms of (\[7.17\]) and (\[7.18\]) with the help of Gauss-Codazzi equality.
To find a holographic representation of the Rényi entropy in 4D CFT we also need an invariant functional ’dual’ to $F_a$, see (\[6.9\]). The problem is that $F_a$ is an integral of the scalar curvature of $\cal B$. This integral is a topological invariant only in $d=4$ when $\cal B$ has dimension 2. In other dimensions $F_a$ is neither topological nor Weyl invariant. On the other hand, the PBH transformations require that liner combinations of curvatures in AdS in any dimension correspond to Weyl invariant structures on the boundary, as in case of Eqs. (\[7.12\])-(\[7.14\]). Therefore, the bulk functional corresponding to $F_a$ cannot be among local invariants linear in curvatures. The only local structure which produces $F_a$ is the volume $\mbox{vol}(\tilde{\cal B})$, see (\[7.9\]). However, the coefficient by $\mbox{vol}(\tilde{\cal B})$ is fixed by the leading (area) term in ERE.
By taking this into account one should look for [*non-local*]{} bulk functionals. For example, for ERE with entangling surface $\cal B$ having topology of $S^2$ ($F_a=-4$) one can choose $$\label{7.23}
\tilde{F}_a=-2l \ln (\mbox{vol}(\tilde{\cal B})/ l^3)~~.$$ Equation (\[7.9\]) can be used to show that $$\label{7.24}
\tilde{F}_a=F_a~l\ln {\mu \over \varepsilon}-2l\ln (A({\cal B})/ \mu^2)+...~~~,$$ Certainly, (\[7.23\]) is not a single option and other non-local structures are possible. The choice of (\[7.23\]) seems to be the simplest. The logarithmic term in a holographic ERE is similar to logarithmic corrections to the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, which are a rather common consequence of quantum effects, see e.g. [@Fursaev:1994te]-[@Sen:2011ba].
Now one can check with the help of (\[7.9\]), (\[7.17\]), (\[7.18\]), and (\[7.24\]) that the following functional: $$\label{7.21}
S(n,\tilde{\cal B})={1 \over 4G_N^{(5)}}\left(\gamma_n\mbox{vol}(\tilde{\cal B})+
2\pi l^2\left(\tilde{a}(\gamma_n)\tilde{F}_a+
\tilde{c}(\gamma_n)\tilde{F}_c+\tilde{b}(\gamma_n)\tilde{F}_b\right)\right)~~,$$ $$\label{7.22a}
\tilde{a}(\gamma_n)=a(\gamma_n)-\frac 14\gamma_n={1 \over 96}(\gamma_n-1)\left(\gamma_n^2+2\gamma_n-15\right)~~,$$ $$\label{7.22c}
\tilde{c}(\gamma_n)=c(\gamma_n)-\frac 14\gamma_n={1 \over 32}(\gamma_n-1)\left(\gamma_n^2+2\gamma_n-3\right)~~,$$ $$\label{7.22b}
\tilde{b}(\gamma_n)=b(\gamma_n)-\frac 14\gamma_n~~,$$ reproduces (\[6.6\]), (\[6.8\]), (\[6.11\]), (\[6.10\]) at large $N$. Adding $-\frac 14\gamma_n$ in (\[7.22a\])-(\[7.22b\]) compensates curvature terms ($F_a$,$F_b$, $F_c$) which come out from $\mbox{vol}(\tilde{\cal B})$, see (\[7.9\]).
Since $\tilde{a}(1)=\tilde{c}(1)=\tilde{b}(1)=0$ expression (\[7.21\]) coincides with Ryu-Takayanagi formula (\[1.1\]) in the limit $n\to 1$. It is also important to note that $S^{(n)}({\cal B})$, like (\[1.1\]), depends only on low-energy constants $G_N^{(5)}$ and $l$ which enter gravity action (\[7.1\]).
Discussion {#spec}
==========
0
We suggest (\[7.21\]) as a holographic formula for the entanglement Rényi entropy. One should emphasize that $S(n,\tilde{\cal B})$ reproduces at least the divergent part (\[1.2\]) of ERE in the conformal theory in four dimensions. Thus, additional terms may be needed in $S(n,\tilde{\cal B})$ to go beyond the given approximation.
One may note some differences between (\[7.21\]) and Ryu-Takayanagi expression (\[1.1\]). Unlike (\[1.1\]), the form of $S(n,\tilde{\cal B})$ explicitly depends on the dimension $d$. This can be seen by comparing (\[7.21\]) with a possible formula of holographic ERE for 2D CFT, see (\[7.21a\]). In (\[7.21a\]) the leading term remains finite in the limit $n\to \infty$ while in (\[7.21\]) the volume term vanishes.
Another distinction between (\[1.1\]) and (\[7.21\]) is that the minimal hypersurface $\tilde{\cal B}$ is not an exact extremal hypersurface for functional (\[7.21\]). (An extremal value of (\[7.21\]) is defined by varying position of the hypersurface under fixed background metric and $n$.) Note that $\tilde{\cal B}$ would be an extremal hypersurface if $\tilde{F}_a$ term alone were present. This term depends only on the volume $\mbox{vol}(\tilde{\cal B})$. However $S(n,\tilde{\cal B})$ includes also terms with $\tilde{F}_b$ and $\tilde{F}_c$ which depend on curvatures. Let us emphasize that the choice of $\tilde{\cal B}$ as an argument in the holographic ERE functional was crucial for finding the correspondence between bulk and boundary quantities.
What happens if $\tilde{\cal B}$ is replaced by a genuine extremal surface? Let us define (\[7.21\]) on a set of codimension 2 hypersurfaces $\tilde{\cal Q}$ in $\tilde{\cal M}$ specified by the same boundary condition as $\tilde{\cal B}$, that is $\partial\tilde{\cal Q}\sim {\cal B}$. Such hypersurfaces have infinitely large volume in the limit $z \to 0$. We also require that for $\tilde{\cal Q}$ the following restrictions are satisfied at $z\to 0$: $\mbox{Tr}~ K^2 \ll l^{-2}$ and $|\tilde{R}_{rsrs}+2l^{-2}|\ll l^{-2}$. These restrictions allow $\tilde{\cal B}$ to belong to the given set. They also guarantee that terms with $\tilde{F}_b$ and $\tilde{F}_c$ in functional $S(n,\tilde{\cal Q})$ are small compared to the volume term. To see this one should take into account that main contributions to integrals are picked up in a neighborhood of $z=0$.
Suppose that $S(n,\tilde{\cal Q})$ has an extremum on some hypersurface $\tilde{\cal Q}$ from the considered set. Extremal hypersurfaces may depend on $n$, in general. Since terms with $\tilde{F}_b$ and $\tilde{F}_c$ are small one can represent $\tilde{\cal Q}$ as $\tilde{\cal B}$ with a small perturbation, $\tilde{\cal Q}=\tilde{\cal B}+\tilde{\cal Q}_1$. Up to terms which are of the second order in the perturbation, $S(n,\tilde{\cal Q})\simeq S(n,\tilde{\cal B})$. The second order terms are given by some (non-local) functional on $\tilde{\cal B}$ quadratic in curvatures which enter $\tilde{F}_b$ and $\tilde{F}_c$. It is important that the second order terms are small compared to $S(n,\tilde{\cal B})$. Therefore, once $S(n,\tilde{\cal B})$ is used to reproduce ERE only in the logarithmic approximation it is safe to replace it with the extremal value $S(n,\tilde{\cal Q})$.
The entanglement Rényi entropy $S^{(n)}({\cal B})$ can be defined by formula (\[2.4\]) in terms of an entanglement partition function $Z(n)$. It is interesting to discuss if there is a holographic representation for $Z(n)$ which results in functional $S(n,\tilde{\cal B})$. We use a line of reasonings suggested in [@Fursaev:2006ih] to show that such a representation may be possible.
In a quantum field theory $Z(n)$ can be written in terms of a path integral where field configurations are located on a manifold ${\cal M}_n$ glued from $n$ copies of the physical manifold $\cal M$ along some cuts $\Sigma_A$ which meet on $\cal B$, see [@Fursaev:2006ng]. ($\cal B$ divides a constant time hypersurface in $\cal M$ on parts $\Sigma_A$ and $\Sigma_B$, the trace in the reduced density matrix (\[2.6\]) is taken over states on $\Sigma_B$.) The AdS/CFT correspondence implies that $Z(n)$ can be replaced by a partition function, $Z^{AdS}[{\cal M}_n]$, in AdS-gravity for which a given CFT is a ’boundary’ theory. The idea of [@Fursaev:2006ih] is that in a low-energy approximation one should look for a path integral representation of $Z^{AdS}[{\cal M}_n]$ with the condition that the conformal boundary of “histories”, $\tilde{\cal M}_n$, involved in the path integral belongs to the conformal class of ${\cal M}_n$, $$\label{8.2}
Z^{AdS}[{\cal M}_n]=\int_{\tilde{\cal M}_n:~\partial \tilde{\cal M}_n \sim {\cal M}_n} [Dg]\exp(-W[g])~~~.$$ Functional $W[g]$ is an effective action which is induced by quantum gravity or string theory dynamics in the AdS bulk. For regular boundary conditions $W[g]$ is approximated by classical action (\[7.1\]). Since the boundary manifolds have conical singularities application of (\[7.1\]) in this case is not obvious.
Although quantum gravity arguments are absent we make a suggestion for $W[g]$ consistent with the holographic ERE. For the given boundary conditions there are two types of geometries $\tilde{\cal M}_n$ which may contribute to (\[8.2\]) in a semiclassical approximation. One type includes spaces which are regular in the bulk, another type includes manifolds with conical singularities. We consider only singular geometries. They can be constructed for the given boundary conditions in the following way [@Fursaev:2006ih]. One starts from bulk geometries $\tilde{\cal M}$ such that $\partial \tilde{\cal M}\sim {\cal M}$. Then, one makes different cuts of $\tilde{\cal M}$ along $d$–dimensional hypersurfaces $\tilde{\Sigma}_A$ with the boundary condition $\partial \tilde{\Sigma}_A \sim \Sigma_A$, where $\Sigma_A$ is the corresponding cut in ${\cal M}$. The boundary condition does not fix $\tilde{\Sigma}_A$ uniquely. By taking $n$ identical copies of $\tilde{\cal M}$ with the same cut $\tilde{\Sigma}_A$ and gluing them along the cuts one gets a space $\tilde{\cal M}_n$ with the required boundary condition $\partial \tilde{\cal M}_n \sim {\cal M}_n$. The bulk spaces have conical singularities on codimension 2 hypersurfaces $\tilde{\cal Q}$ related to the entangling surface, $\partial \tilde{\cal Q} \sim \cal B$. The holographic ERE defined by AdS partition function and approximated by using (\[8.2\]) is $$\label{8.8}
S^{AdS}(n)= {1 \over 1-n}\left(\ln Z^{AdS}[{\cal M}_n]-n\ln Z^{AdS}[{\cal M}]\right)
\simeq{1 \over n-1}\left(W(n)-nW(1)\right)$$ where $W(n)$ is a least value of the effective action on some singular space $\tilde{\cal M}_n$.
We want to find $W(n)$ by requiring that $S^{AdS}(n)\simeq S(n,{\cal B})$. It is natural to assume that the leading part of $W(n)$ is local and is similar to a divergent part of a QFT effective action on manifolds with conical singularities. The structure of the heat kernel coefficients (\[6.17\]) then implies that $W(n)$ is a sum of two terms: one is defined on a regular domain $\tilde{\cal M}_n/\tilde{\cal Q}$, the other is located on $\tilde{\cal Q}$ and induced by quantum effects on conical singularities. The term on a regular domain coincides with classical action (\[7.1\]). It is proportional to $n$ and does not contribute to ERE (\[8.8\]). The only possible form of the leading part of $W(n)$ which allows one to equate the two entropies, $S^{AdS}(n)\simeq S(n,\tilde{\cal Q})$, is $$\label{8.7}
W(n)\simeq I[\tilde{\cal M}_n/\tilde{\cal Q}]+(n-1)
S(n,\tilde{\cal Q})~~.$$ What is a singular manifold where the effective action has a least value? The fact that a saddle ’point’ is a singular manifold even without a matter source which supports the conical singularities should not be considered as a controversy. The extremum of $W(n)$ is defined within a restricted set of geometries. For other class of geometries which contribute to (\[8.2\]) and are regular in the bulk one should use another action. One should also note that (\[8.7\]) does not coincide with a classical action (\[7.1\]) naively taken on $\tilde{\cal M}_n$. In this case one would not get in (\[8.7\]) $\tilde{F}_a$, $\tilde{F}_b$ and $\tilde{F}_c$ terms. The two actions agree only in the limit $n\to 1$ up to terms linear in $(n-1)$.
Variations of the two terms in (\[8.7\]) are required to vanish independently. Variations of $I[\tilde{\cal M}_n/\tilde{\cal Q}]$ are subject to certain boundary conditions near conical singularities to preserve their structure. They result in the standard bulk gravity equations for (\[7.1\]). That is, locally $\tilde{\cal M}_n$ is one of solutions of AdS gravity. Minimization of $S(n,\tilde{\cal Q})$ implies that $\tilde{\cal Q}$ is an extremal hypersurface, thus, in the leading approximation we recover the holographic entanglement entropy $S(n,\tilde{\cal B})$ from $S^{AdS}(n)$.
Although the above ’derivation’ of holographic ERE is based on a number of assumptions it may be a plausible scenario. An explanation of Ryu-Takayanagi formula (\[1.1\]) seems to be its particular case which follows in the limit $n\to 1$. This gives a further support to earlier arguments presented in [@Fursaev:2006ih] and allows one to avoid their criticism in [@Headrick:2010zt].
It would be very interesting to understand the behaviour of ERE in a strong coupling regime. Our approach to the holographic description of ERE should hold in this case but functions $\tilde{a}(\gamma_n)$, $\tilde{b}(\gamma_n)$, $\tilde{c}(\gamma_n)$ in (\[7.21\]) may be different. The reason is that the logarithmic terms in the Renyi entropy for $n>1$ are not determined solely by the conformal anomaly. They are not protected from both perturbative and non-perturbative corrections, as was pointed out in [@Klebanov:2011uf]. This may be the reason why results of [@Hung:2011nu] for a spherical entangling surface disagree with weak coupling formula (\[rel3\]).
Our proposal may be compatible with the approach of [@Hung:2011nu] (after a proper redefinition of $\tilde{a}(\gamma_n)$, $\tilde{b}(\gamma_n)$, and $\tilde{c}(\gamma_n)$) but to resolve the issue one needs to know quantum corrections to ERE.
Conformal transformations {#A-A}
=========================
0
Several useful relations for conformal transformations of the metric of a $D$ dimensional manifold $$\label{a1.1}
\bar{g}_{\mu\nu}(x)=e^{-2\omega(x)}g_{\mu\nu}(x)~~$$ are listed below for the sake of completeness. Dimensionality $D$ in cases considered in our work is either $d+1$ or $d$, where $d$ is the dimensionality of the boundary CFT. One can find the following transformations: $$\bar{R}_{\lambda\mu\nu\rho}=e^{-2\omega}\left[R_{\lambda\mu\nu\rho}+\omega_{\lambda\nu}g_{\mu\rho}
-\omega_{\lambda\rho}g_{\mu\nu}-\omega_{\mu\nu}g_{\lambda\rho}-\omega_{\mu\rho}g_{\lambda\nu}+\right.$$ $$\label{a1.2}
\left. \omega_{\mu}\omega_{\rho}g_{\lambda\nu}-\omega_{\nu}\omega_{\mu}g_{\lambda\rho}+
\omega_{\nu}\omega_{\lambda}g_{\rho\mu}-\omega_{\lambda}\omega_{\rho}g_{\mu\nu} +
\omega^\alpha\omega_\alpha(g_{\mu\nu}g_{\lambda\rho}-g_{\mu\rho}g_{\lambda\nu})\right]~~,$$ $$\label{a1.3}
\bar{R}_{\mu\nu}=R_{\mu\nu}+(D-2)\omega_{\mu\nu}+g_{\mu\nu}\Delta\omega+(D-2)\omega_{\mu}\omega_{\nu}+
(2-D)\omega^\alpha\omega_\alpha~g_{\mu\nu}~~,$$ $$\label{a1.4}
\bar{R}=e^{2\omega}\left[R+2(D-1)\Delta\omega-(D-2)(D-1)\omega^\alpha\omega_\alpha\right]~~,$$ where $\omega_\mu=\omega_{,\mu}$, $\omega_{\mu\nu}=\omega_{;\mu\nu}$. If there is a codimension 2 hypersurface with two normal vectors $n_i$ one can also establish the following scaling properties: $$\label{a1.1n}
\bar{n}_i^\mu=e^{\omega}n_i^\mu~~,$$ $$\label{a1.5}
(\bar{k_i})_{\mu\nu}=e^{-\omega}\left[(k_i)_{\mu\nu}-h_{\mu\nu} n_i^\lambda\omega_{,\lambda}\right]~~,$$ $$\label{a1.6}
\bar{C}_{ijij}=e^{2\omega}C_{ijij}~~,$$ $$\label{a1.7}
\bar{k}_i^2-(D-2)\mbox{Tr}(\bar{k}_i^2)=e^{2\omega}\left(k_i^2-(D-2)\mbox{Tr}(k_i^2)\right)
~~,$$ where $h_{\mu\nu}=g_{\mu\nu}-(n_i)_\mu (n_i)_\nu$ is the metric on the hypersurface, $(k_i)_{\mu\nu}=h_{\mu}^{\lambda}h_{\nu}^{\rho}(n_i)_{\mu;\nu}$ are its extrinsic curvatures, $C_{ijij}$ is the normal projection (\[6.13\]) of the Weyl tensor (\[6.14\]). Our convention is that $n_i$ are outward pointing vectors.
Tilt angle of the holographic surface in AdS {#A-B}
============================================
0
To prove (\[7.6\]) for the tilt angle $\varphi$ shown on Fig. \[F1\] we consider embedding of $\tilde{\cal B}$ described by the equation $$\label{A-B.1}
z=\psi(x)~~~.$$ From definition of vectors $m$ and $n$ one finds $$\label{A-B.2}
\sin\varphi=(m\cdot n)={1 \over \sqrt{1+(\psi')^2}}~~~,$$ where $(\psi')^2=\psi_{,\mu}g^{\mu\nu}\psi_{,\nu}$ and $g_{\mu\nu}$ is defined in (\[7.1a\]). We suppose that $\tilde{\cal B}$ is a minimal codimension 2 hypersurface embedded in $d+1$ dimensional manifold which is a solution to the Einstein equations with a negative cosmological constant. In this case $\psi$ is a solution to the equation $$\label{A-B.3}
{d-1 \over \psi\sqrt{1+(\psi')^2}}+{1 \over \sqrt{g}}\partial_\mu
\left(\sqrt{g}{g^{\mu\nu}\psi_{,\nu} \over \sqrt{1+(\psi')^2}}\right)=0~~~$$ which determines a minimum of $\mbox{vol}(\tilde{\cal B})$.
We prove (\[7.6\]) by studying asymptotic of the tilt angle in the form $\varphi\simeq \lambda z$. The parameter $\lambda$ is fixed for known examples, when $\partial \tilde{\cal B}$ (or $\cal B$) is either a hypersphere, 2 infinite parallel planes or a cylinder. The bulk space $\tilde{\cal M}$ is assumed to be a pure AdS space.
1\. [*Sphere*]{}. We choose the $d$-dimensional part of metric (\[7.1a\]) in the form $$\label{A-B.4}
g_{\mu\nu}dx^\mu dx^\nu=d\tau^2+dr^2+r^2d\Omega^2_{d-2}~~~,$$ $d\geq 3$, where $d\Omega^2_{d-2}$ is a metric on a unit sphere $S^{d-2}$. The surface ${\cal B}$ is $S^{d-2}$ with the radius $r=R$. The trace of extrinsic curvature of ${\cal B}$ is $k=(d-2)/R$. Equation for $\tilde{\cal B}$ is $\psi=\psi(r)$. The solution to (\[A-B.3\]) for the given boundary condition is [@Ryu:2006ef] $$\label{A-B.5}
\psi(r)=\sqrt{C^2-r^2}~~~,$$ where $C=\sqrt{z^2+R^2}$ and $z=const$ is a position of $\partial \tilde{\cal B}$. One has from (\[A-B.2\]) and (\[A-B.5\]) $$\label{A-B.6}
\sin\varphi={\psi \over C}\simeq {z \over R}~~~,$$ where we took into account that $C=R$ in the limit $z\to 0$. Eq. (\[A-B.6\]) is equivalent to (\[7.6\]) at small $z$.
2\. [*Parallel planes*]{}. The metric is $$\label{A-B.7}
g_{\mu\nu}dx^\mu dx^\nu=d\tau^2+dy^2+dx_1^2+...+dx_{d-2}^2~~~,$$ $d\geq 3$. The surface ${\cal B}$ consists of 2 parallel planes with positions $y=0$, $y=a$. The extrinsic curvatures of ${\cal B}$ are equal to zero. Equation for $\tilde{\cal B}$ is $\psi=\psi(y)$. The solution to (\[A-B.3\]) has the property [@Ryu:2006ef] $$\label{A-B.8}
\psi'_y(y)=\psi^{-(d-1)}\sqrt{C^2-\psi^{2(d-1)}}~~~,$$ where $C$ is a constant which is fixed by the boundary conditions. One finds from (\[A-B.2\]) and (\[A-B.8\]) that $$\label{A-B.9}
\sin\varphi={\psi^{(d-1)} \over C}\sim z^{(d-1)}~~~,$$ where we took into account that $C=R$ in the limit $z\to 0$. Thus, $\varphi=O(z^{d-1})$ rather than $O(z)$, as in (\[7.6\]), in accord with the fact that $\cal B$ has zero extrinsic curvature.
3\. [*Cylinder*]{}. The metric is $$\label{A-B.10}
g_{\mu\nu}dx^\mu dx^\nu=d\tau^2+d\rho^2+\rho^2 d\theta^2+...+dx_{d-3}^2~~~,$$ $d\geq 4$, $0\leq \theta <2\pi$. Equation of $\cal B$ is $\rho=a$, the trace of extrinsic curvature of ${\cal B}$ is $k=1/a$. Equation for $\tilde{\cal B}$ is $\psi=\psi(\rho)$. The solution to (\[A-B.3\]) has the following asymptotic near the boundary [@Solodukhin:2008dh]: $$\label{A-B.11}
\psi(\rho)\simeq \sqrt{2a(d-2)(a-\rho)}~~~,$$which yields for (\[A-B.2\]) $$\label{A-B.12}
\sin\varphi\simeq{\psi \over a(d-2)}={z \over a(d-2)}~~~.$$ Eq. (\[A-B.12\]) is equivalent to (\[7.6\]) for the given extrinsic curvature.
Asymptotic equations of the holographic surface {#A-D}
===============================================
0
In this section we derive Eqs. (\[7.7\]), (\[7.8\]). We describe embedding of $\tilde{\cal B}$ by the equations $$\label{A-D.1a}
x^\mu=x^\mu(z,y)~~,~~\mu\neq \tau,$$ $$\label{A-D.1b}
~~\tau=const~~,$$ where $\tau$ is a time coordinate. Coordinates on $\tilde{\cal B}$ are $z$ and $y^a$, $a=1,...,d-2$. At constant and small $z$ functions $x^\mu(z,y)$ describe embedding $x^\mu=x^\mu(y)$ of the boundary $\partial \tilde{\cal B}$, and, consequently, embedding of $\cal B$. In this case $y^a$ are coordinates on $\partial \tilde{\cal B}$ and $\cal B$. One can consider the following decomposition near the boundary: $$\label{A-D.7}
x^\mu(z,y)=x^\mu(y)+x^\mu_{(1)}(y)z+x^\mu_{(2)}(y)z^2+...,~~\mu\neq \tau~~.$$ It is convenient to define the vector $q$ in the tangent space to $\tilde{\cal B}$, see Fig. \[F1\], $$\label{A-D.3}
q=n\cos\varphi-p\sin\varphi ~~,$$ where $\varphi$ is the tilt angle. Vector $q$ is unit and orthogonal (in the tangent space) to the boundary $\partial \tilde{\cal B}$. To determine subleading terms in decomposition (\[A-D.7\]) we note that vectors $\partial_z x^L(z,y)$, $\partial_a x^L(z,y)$ (where $x^L=(z,x^\mu)$) are in the tangent space and obey the following properties: $\partial_z x^L(z,y)$ is directed along $q$, while $\partial_a x^L(z,y)$ is orthogonal to $q$. These properties result in conditions: $$\label{A-D.8}
\partial_z x^\mu(z,y)=-\tan \varphi~ \bar{p}^\mu~~,$$ $$\label{A-D.9}
\bar{p}^\mu g_{\mu\nu}(z,y) \partial_ax^\nu(z,y)=0~~,$$ where $g_{\mu\nu}(z,y)/z^2$ is a metric induced on $\partial \tilde{\cal M}$. In (\[A-D.8\]), (\[A-D.9\]) we used the fact that $n_\mu=p_z=0$ and introduced the vector $\bar{p}_\mu=zp_\mu$, $\bar{p}^\mu =g^{\mu\nu}\bar{p}_\nu$, which is normalized as $\bar{p}^\mu\bar{p}_\mu=1$. In the limit $z\to 0$ the metric $g_{\mu\nu}$ coincides with the metric on $\cal M$, and $\bar{p}_\mu$ is the normal vector to $\cal B$ in $\cal M$. It follows from (\[7.6\]) and integration of (\[A-D.8\]) over $z$ that $$\label{A-D.10}
x^\mu(z,y)=x^\mu(y)-{k \over 2(d-2)}\bar{p}^\mu ~z^2+...,~~\mu\neq \tau~~.$$ Eq. (\[A-D.10\]) was derived in [@Schwimmer:2008yh] by using PBH transformations.
Let us now derive the metric induced on $\tilde{\cal B}$, see Eqs. (\[7.7\]), (\[7.8\]). The metric can be written as $$\label{A-D.2}
ds^2(\tilde{\cal B})=h_{zz}dz^2+2h_{za}dzdy^a+h_{ab}dy^ady^b~,$$ $$\label{A-D.4a}
h_{zz}={1 \over z^2}(1+\partial_z x^\mu g_{\mu\nu}\partial_z x^\nu)=
{1 \over z^2}(1+\tan^2 \varphi~ \bar{p}^\mu\bar{p}_\mu)=
{1 \over z^2\cos^2 \varphi}~~,$$ $$\label{A-D.4b}
h_{za}={1 \over z^2}\partial_z x^\mu g_{\mu\nu}\partial_a x^\nu=0~~,$$ $$\label{A-D.4c}
h_{ab}={1 \over z^2}g_{\mu\nu}\partial_a x^\mu\partial_b x^\nu\equiv {\sigma_{ab} \over z^2}~~,$$ where we used (\[A-D.8\]), (\[A-D.9\]). Thus, (\[A-D.2\]) reproduces (\[7.7\]). To proceed with computation of $\sigma_{ab}$ near the boundary and prove (\[7.8\]) one should use (\[A-D.9\]), (\[A-D.10\]) $$\label{A-D.10a}
\partial_a x^\mu(z,y)=\partial_a x^\mu(y)-{z^2 \over 2(d-2)}\partial_a(k \bar{p}^\mu)+...,$$ take into account the definition of the extrinsic curvature of $\cal B$, $$\label{A-D.11}
k_{ab}=x^\mu_{~,a} x^\nu_{~,b}\bar{p}_{\mu;\nu}~~,$$ and Fefferman-Graham asymptotic (\[7.2\]), (\[7.3\]).
Asymptotic properties of curvature invariants {#A-C}
=============================================
0
The aim of this section is to prove Eqs. (\[7.12\]) and (\[7.13\]). Equation (\[7.14\]) follows from (\[7.12\]), (\[7.13\]) and Gauss-Codazzi identity (\[GC\]). We use results of Sec. \[A-A\] and make a conformal transformation of metric (\[7.1a\]) to metric $$\label{A-C.1}
ds^2=dz^2 + g_{\mu\nu}(z,x)dx^\mu dx^\nu\equiv g_{KL}dx^K dx^L~~.$$ We denote a manifold with metric (\[A-C.1\]) as $\tilde{\cal M}'$. The holographic surface after the conformal transformation is mapped to a codimension 2 hypersurface $\tilde{\cal B}'$ in $\tilde{\cal M}'$. Note that $\partial \tilde{\cal B}'={\cal B}$. The scalar curvature of $\tilde{\cal B}'$ is $\tilde{R}'_B$.
After the conformal transformation we use the same letters for the normal vectors shown on Fig. \[F1\]. The transformation does not change angle $\varphi$. As earlier $\tilde{\cal B}$ is assumed to be minimal so we can use results of Sec. \[A-B\]. We enumerate normal vectors to $\tilde{\cal B}'$ (vectors $m$ and $l=\partial_\tau$ normalized to unity with the help of (\[A-C.1\])) by letters $r,s$. Then, for example, the normal projection of the Riemann tensor of $\tilde{\cal M}'$ at $\tilde{\cal B}'$ is $\tilde{R}'_{rsrs}=2\tilde{R}'_{KLMN}m^Kl^Lm^Ml^N$.
The letters $i,j$ correspond to normal vectors to ${\cal B}$ (these are vectors $p$ and $l$). Analogously, repeated indexes $i$ or $j$ denote projection with the help of $p$ and $l$ of tensor components at ${\cal B}$.
One has the relations which follow from (\[a1.2\]), (\[a1.4\]) $$\label{A-C.2}
\tilde{R}_{rsrs}
=z^2\left(\tilde{R}'_{rsrs}+
2(\omega_{ss}-\omega_{\|}\omega^{\|})\right)~~~,$$ $$\label{A-C.3}
\tilde{R}_B=z^2\left(\tilde{R}'_B+2(d-2)\Delta_{\|}\omega-(d-2)(d-1)\omega_{\|}\omega^{\|}\right)~~~.$$ Here $\omega=\ln z$, while $\omega_{\|}$, $\Delta_{\|}\omega$ are, respectively, derivatives and the Laplace operator in the space tangent to $\tilde{\cal B}'$.
One finds, by the definition, $$\omega_{ss}=(l^Kl^N+m^Km^N)\omega_{;KN}=$$ $$\label{A-C.4}
(l^Kl^N+\sin^2\varphi~ n^Kn^N+2\sin\varphi\cos\varphi~ n^Kp^N
+\cos^2\varphi~ p^Kp^N)\omega_{;KN}\simeq g^{(1)}_{ii}-{k^2 \over (d-2)^2}~~,$$ where $n=\partial_z$. The last equality follows in the limit $z\to 0$ if one uses (\[7.6\]) and the Fefferman-Graham asymptotic (\[7.2\]). Note that metric $g_{KL}$ is static. In (\[A-C.4\]) $$\label{A-C.5}
g^{(1)}_{ii}=(l^\mu l^\nu+p^\mu p^\nu)g^{(1)}_{\mu\nu}=-{1 \over d-2}\left(R_{ii}-{R \over d-1}\right)~~~,$$ see (\[7.3\]), where $R$ and $R_{\mu\nu}$ are the curvatures of $\cal M$. In a similar way one finds $$\label{A-C.6}
\omega_{\|}\omega^{\|}=q^Kq^L~\omega_{,K}\omega_{,L}=\cos^2\varphi~ n^Kn^L\omega_{,K}\omega_{,L}
\simeq {1 \over z^2}-{k^2 \over (d-2)^2}~~~.$$ Equation (\[7.12\]) follows from (\[A-C.2\]), (\[A-C.4\])-(\[A-C.6\]) if one takes into account that in the limit $z\to 0$ $$\label{A-C.7}
\tilde{R}'_{rsrs}\simeq 2\tilde{R}'_{KLMN}p^Kl^Lp^Ml^N=R_{ijij}~~~,$$ and definition (\[6.14\]) of the Weyl tensor in the corresponding dimensionality.
To get (\[7.13\]) one should use (\[7.7\]), (\[7.8\]). If one uses notations $$\label{A-C.9}
\sigma_{ab}(z,y)=\sigma_{ab}(y)+z^2 \sigma^{(1)}_{ab}(y)+..,$$ $$\label{A-C.10}
\sigma^{(1)}_{ab}(y)=-{1 \over d-2}\left(kk_{ab}+R_{ab}-{\gamma_{ab} \over 2(d-1)}R\right)~~~,$$ then $$\label{A-C.11}
\tilde{R}'_B(z,y)=R({\cal B})-2\sigma^{(1)}_{ab}\sigma^{ab}+...$$ $$\label{A-C.12}
\Delta_{\|}\omega=-{1 \over z^2}+\sigma^{(1)}_{ab}\sigma^{ab}+...~~~.$$ Equation (\[7.13\]) follows from (\[A-C.3\]),(\[A-C.6\]),(\[A-C.11\]), and (\[A-C.12\]). One should also take into account an analog of Gauss-Codazzi relation (\[GC\]) for $\cal B$ in $\cal M$ and the definition of the Weyl tensor.
S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**96**]{} (2006) 181602, e-Print: hep-th/0603001.
S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, JHEP 0608 (2006) 045, e-Print: hep-th/0605073.
D.V. Fursaev, JHEP 0609:018 (2006), e-Print: hep-th/0606184.
I.R. Klebanov, D. Kutasov, A. Murugan, Nucl. Phys. [**B796**]{} (2008) 274, e-Print: arXiv:0709.2140 \[hep-th\]
Ling-Yan Hung, R.C. Myers, M. Smolkin, JHEP 1104:025 (2011), e-Print: arXiv:1101.5813 \[hep-th\].
J. de Boer, M. Kulaxizi, A. Parnachev, [*Holographic Entanglement Entropy in Lovelock Gravities*]{}, e-Print: arXiv:1101.5781 \[hep-th\].
R.C. Myers, A. Sinha, JHEP 1101:125 (2011), e-Print: arXiv:1011.5819 \[hep-th\].
T. Takayanagi, [*Holographic Dual of BCFT*]{}, e-Print: arXiv:1105.5165 \[hep-th\].
T. Nishioka, S. Ryu, T. Takayanagi, J. Phys. [**A42**]{} (2009) 504008, e-Print: arXiv:0905.0932 \[hep-th\].
S.N. Solodukhin, [*Entanglement Entropy of Black Holes*]{}, e-Print: arXiv:1104.3712 \[hep-th\].
M. Headrick, Phys. Rev. [**D82**]{} (2010) 126010. e-Print: arXiv:1006.0047 \[hep-th\].
H. Casini, M. Huerta, Phys. Lett. [**B694**]{} (2010) 167, e-Print: arXiv:1007.1813 \[hep-th\].
I.R. Klebanov, S.S. Pufu, S. Sachdev, B.R. Safdi, [*Rényi Entropies for Free Field Theories*]{}, e-Print: arXiv:1111.6290 \[hep-th\].
Ling-Yan Hung, R.C. Myers, M. Smolkin, A. Yale, [*Holographic Calculations of Rényi Entropy*]{}, e-Print: arXiv:1110.1084 \[hep-th\].
D. Nesterov and S.N. Solodukhin, Nucl. Phys. [**B842**]{} (2011) 141, e-Print:arXiv:1007.1246 \[hep-th\]
D.V. Fursaev, Phys. Rev. [**D73**]{} (2006) 124025 e-Print: hep-th/0602134.
P. Calabrese and J.L. Cardy, J. Stat. Mech. 0406:P06002 (2004), e-Print: hep-th/0405152
D.N. Kabat, Nucl. Phys. [**B453**]{} (1995) 281, e-Print: hep-th/9503016.
D.V. Fursaev and G. Miele, Nucl. Phys. [**B484**]{} (1997) 697, e-Print: hep-th/9605153.
D.V. Fursaev, Phys. Lett. [**B334**]{} (1994) 53, e-Print: hep-th/9405143.
J.S. Dowker, Phys. Rev. [**D50**]{} (1994) 6369, e-Print: hep-th/9406144.
J.S. Dowker, Class. Quantum. Grav. [**11**]{} (1994) L137, e-Print: hep-th/9406002.
D.V. Fursaev, Nucl. Phys. [**B524**]{} (1998) 447, e-Print: hep-th/9709213.
L. De Nardo, D.V. Fursaev, G. Miele, Class. Quantum. Grav. [**14**]{} (1997) 1059, e-Print: hep-th/9610011.
D. Fursaev and D. Vassilevich, [*Operators, Geometry and Quanta: Methods of Spectral Geometry in Quantum Field Theory*]{},Springer Series ’Theoretical and Mathematical Physics’, Springer, 2011.
S.N. Solodukhin, Phys. Lett. [**B665**]{} (2008) 305, e-Print: arXiv:0802.3117 \[hep-th\].
D.V. Fursaev and S.N. Solodukhin, Phys. Rev. [**D52**]{} (1995) 2133, e-Print: hep-th/9501127.
D.V. Fursaev and S.N. Solodukhin, Phys. Lett. [**B365**]{} (1996) 51, e-Print: hep-th/9412020.
A. Schwimmer and S. Theisen, Nucl. Phys. [**B801**]{} (2008) 1, e-Print: arXiv:0802.1017 \[hep-th\].
J. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. [**2**]{} (1998) 231.
E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. [**2**]{} (1998) 253.
S. Gubser, I. Klebanov, A. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. [**B428**]{} (1998) 105.
M. Henningson and K. Skenderis, JHEP (1998) 9807:023, e-Print: hep-th/9806087.
J.D. Brown, M. Henneaux, Commun. Math. Phys. [**104**]{} (1986) 207, R. Penrose and W. Rindler, [*Spinors and Space-Time*]{}, Cambridge University Press, 1986.
D.V. Fursaev, Phys. Rev. [**D51**]{} (1995) 5352. e-Print: hep-th/9412161.
S. Das, P. Majumdar, R.K. Bhaduri, Class. Quantum Grav. [**19**]{} (2002) 2355, e-Print: hep-th/0111001.
R. Banerjee, B.R. Majhi, JHEP (2008) 0806:095, e-Print: arXiv:0805.2220 \[hep-th\].
A. Sen, [*Logarithmic Corrections to N=2 Black Hole Entropy: An Infrared Window into the Microstates*]{}, e-Print: arXiv:1108.3842 \[hep-th\].
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'Existing image-based activity understanding methods mainly adopt direct mapping, from image to activity concepts, which may encounter performance bottleneck since the huge gap. In light of this, we propose a new path: infer human part states first and then reason out the activities based on part-level semantics. Human Body Part States (**PaSta**) are fine-grained action semantic tokens, $\langle hand, hold, something\rangle$, which can compose the activities and help us step toward human activity knowledge engine. To fully utilize the power of *PaSta*, we build a large-scale knowledge base ***PaSta*Net**, which contains **7M+** *PaSta* annotations. And two corresponding models are proposed: first, we design a model named Activity2Vec to extract *PaSta* features, which aim to be general representations for various activities. Second, we use a *PaSta*-based Reasoning method to infer activities. Promoted by *PaSta*Net, our method achieves significant improvements, 6.4 and 13.9 mAP on full and one-shot sets of HICO in supervised learning, and 3.2 and 4.2 mAP on V-COCO and images-based AVA in transfer learning. Code and data are available at <http://hake-mvig.cn/>.'
author:
- |
Yong-Lu Li, Liang Xu, Xinpeng Liu, Xijie Huang, Yue Xu,\
Shiyi Wang, Hao-Shu Fang, Ze Ma, Mingyang Chen, Cewu Lu[^1]\
Shanghai Jiao Tong University\
[{yonglu\_li, liangxu, otaku\_huang, silicxuyue, shiywang}@sjtu.edu.cn,]{}\
[{xinpengliu0907, fhaoshu}@gmail.com,]{} [{maze1234556, cmy\_123, lucewu}@sjtu.edu.cn]{}
bibliography:
- 'egbib.bib'
title: '*PaSta*Net: Toward Human Activity Knowledge Engine'
---
Introduction
============
![Instance-level and hierarchical methods. Besides the instance-level path, we perform body part states recognition in part-level with the *PaSta* annotations. With the help of *PaSta*, we can significantly boost the performance of activity understanding.[]{data-label="Figure:paradigm_compare"}](insight.pdf){width="45.00000%"}
Understanding activity from images is crucial for building an intelligent system. Facilitated by deep learning, great advancements have been made in this field. Recent works [@Delaitre2011Learning; @Yao2012Action; @Yang2010Recognizing; @Maji2012Action] mainly address this high-level cognition task in one-stage, from pixels to activity concept directly based on *instance-level semantics* (Fig. \[Figure:paradigm\_compare\](a)). This strategy faces performance bottleneck on large-scale benchmarks [@hicodet; @AVA]. Understanding activities is difficult for reasons, long-tail data distribution, complex visual patterns, . Moreover, action understanding expects a *knowledge engine* that can generally support activity related tasks. Thus, for data from another domain and unseen activities, much smaller effort is required for knowledge transfer and adaptation. Additionally, for most cases, we find that only a few key human parts are relevant to the existing actions, the other parts usually carry very few useful clues.
Consider the example in Fig. \[Figure:paradigm\_compare\], we argue that perception in human *part-level semantics* is a promising path but previously ignored. Our core idea is that human instance actions are composed of *fine-grained atomic body part states*. This lies in strong relationships with reductionism [@Reductionism]. Moreover, the part-level path can help us to pick up discriminative parts and disregard irrelevant ones. Therefore, encoding knowledge from human parts is a crucial step toward *human activity knowledge engine*. The generic object part states [@partstate] reveal that the semantic state of an object part is limited. For example, after exhaustively checking on $7M$ manually labeled body part state samples, we find that there are only about 12 states for “head” in daily life activities, such as “listen to”, “eat”, “talk to”, “inspect”, . Therefore, in this paper, we exhaustively collect and annotate the possible semantic meanings of human parts in activities to build a large-scale human part knowledge base ***PaSta*Net** (*PaSta* is the abbreviation of Body Part State). Now *PaSta*Net includes **118 K+** images, **285 K+** persons, **250 K+** interacted objects, **724 K+** activities and **7 M+** human part states. Extensive analysis verifies that *PaSta*Net can cover most of the the part-level knowledge in general. Using learned *PaSta* knowledge in *transfer learning*, we can achieve 3.2, 4.2 and 3.2 improvements on V-COCO [@vcoco], images-based AVA [@AVA] and HICO-DET [@hicodet] (Sec.\[sec:transfer\]).
Given *PaSta*Net, we propose two powerful tools to promote the image-based activity understanding: 1) **Activity2Vec**: With *PaSta*Net, we convert a human instance into a vector consisting of *PaSta* representations. Activity2Vec extracts part-level semantic representation via *PaSta* recognition and combines its language representation. Since *PaSta* encodes common knowledge of activities, Activity2Vec works as a general feature extractor for both seen and unseen activities. 2) **PaSta-R**: A Part State Based Reasoning method (*PaSta-R*) is further presented. We construct a *Hierarchical Activity Graph* consisting of human instance and part semantic representations, and infer the activities by combining both instance and part level sub-graph states.
The advantages of our method are two-fold: 1) **Reusability and Transferability**: *PaSta* are basic components of actions, their relationship can be in analogy with the amino acid and protein, letter and word, . Hence, *PaSta* are **reusable**, , $\langle hand, hold, something\rangle$ is *shared* by various actions like “hold horse” and “eat apple”. Therefore, we get the capacity to describe and differentiate plenty of activities with a much smaller set of *PaSta*, one-time labeling and transferability. For few-shot learning, reusability can greatly alleviate its learning difficulty. Thus our approach shows significant improvements, we boost 13.9 mAP on one-shot sets of HICO [@hico]. 2) **Interpretability**: we obtain not only more powerful activity representations, but also better interpretation. When the model predicts what a person is doing, we can easily know the reasons: what the body parts are doing.
In conclusion, we believe *PaSta*Net will function as a human activity knowledge engine. Our main contributions are: 1) We construct *PaSta*Net, the first large-scale activity knowledge base with fine-grained *PaSta* annotations. 2) We propose a novel method to extract part-level activity representation named Activity2Vec and a *PaSta*-based reasoning method. 3) In supervised and transfer learning, our method achieves significant improvements on large-scale activity benchmarks, 6.4 (16%), 5.6 (33%) mAP improvements on HICO [@hico] and HICO-DET [@hicodet] respectively.
Related Works
=============
[**Activity Understanding.**]{} Benefited by deep learning and large-scale datasets, image-based [@hico; @vcoco; @openimages; @MPII] or video-based [@AVA; @pang2019deep; @pang2020deep; @Kinetics; @UCF101; @shao2018find; @JhuangICCV2013] activity understanding has achieved huge improvements recently. Human activities have a hierarchical structure and include diverse verbs, so it is hard to define an explicit organization for their categories. Existing datasets [@AVA; @hico; @activitynet; @vcoco] often have a large difference in definition, thus transferring knowledge from one dataset to another is ineffective. Meanwhile, plenty of works have been proposed to address the activity understanding [@Delaitre2011Learning; @Gkioxari_2015_ICCV; @Du_2015_CVPR; @NIPS2014_5353; @Feichtenhofer_2016_CVPR; @6165309; @Tran_2015_ICCV; @Sun_2015_ICCV]. There are holistic body-level approaches [@Thurau2008Pose; @Delaitre2011Learning], body part-based methods [@Gkioxari_2015_ICCV], and skeleton-based methods [@Vemulapalli_2014_CVPR; @Du_2015_CVPR], . But compared with other tasks such as object detection [@faster] or pose estimation [@fang2017rmpe], its performance is still limited.
[**Human-Object Interaction.**]{} Human-Object Interaction (HOI) [@hico; @hicodet] occupies the most of daily human activities. In terms of tasks, some works focus on image-based HOI recognition [@hico]. Furthermore, instance-based HOI detection [@hicodet; @vcoco] needs to detect accurate positions of the humans and objects and classify interaction simultaneously. In terms of the information utilization, some works utilized holistic human body and pose [@Thurau2008Pose; @Yao2012Action; @Yang2010Recognizing; @Maji2012Action; @choutas2018potion], and global context is also proved to be effective [@Hu2014Recognising; @Yao2010Modeling; @Yao2011Human; @Delaitre2011Learning]. According to the learning paradigm, earlier works were often based on hand-crafted features [@Delaitre2011Learning; @Hu2014Recognising]. Benefited from large scale HOI datasets, recent approaches [@Gkioxari_2015_ICCV; @Fang2018Pairwise; @Gkioxari2014R; @Gkioxari2017Detecting; @Mallya2016Learning; @qi2018learning; @gao2018ican; @interactiveness] started to use deep neural networks to extract features and achieved great improvements.
[**Body Part based Methods.**]{} Besides the instance pattern, some approaches studied to utilize part pattern [@Yao2010Modeling; @Fang2018Pairwise; @Gkioxari_2015_ICCV; @Du_2015_CVPR; @Maji2012Action; @zhao2017single]. Gkioxari [@Gkioxari_2015_ICCV] detects both the instance and parts and input them all into a classifier. Fang [@Fang2018Pairwise] defines part pairs and encodes pair features to improve HOI recognition. Yao [@Yao2010Modeling] builds a graphical model and embed parts appearance as nodes, and use them with object feature and pose to predict the HOIs. Previous work mainly utilized the part *appearance* and *location*, but few studies tried to divide the instance actions into discrete part-level semantic tokens, and refer them as the basic components of activity concepts. In comparison, we aim at building human part semantics as **reusable** and **transferable** knowledge.
[**Part States.**]{} Part state is proposed in [@partstate]. By tokenizing the semantic space as a discrete set of part states, [@partstate] constructs a sort of basic descriptors based on segmentation [@he2017mask; @fang2019instaboost; @xu2018srda]. To exploit this cue, we divide the human body into natural parts and utilize their states as discretized part semantics to represent activities. In this paper, we focus on the part states of humans instead of daily objects.
Constructing *PaSta*Net {#sec:hake-construction}
=======================
In this section, we introduce the construction of *PaSta*Net. *PaSta*Net seeks to explore the common knowledge of human *PaSta* as atomic elements to infer activities.
[***PaSta* Definition.**]{} We decompose human body into *ten* parts, namely *head, two upper arms, two hands, hip, two thighs, two feet*. Part states (*PaSta*) will be assigned to these parts. Each *PaSta* represents a description of the target part. For example, the *PaSta* of “hand” can be “hold something” or “push something”, the *PaSta* of “head” can be “watch something”, “eat something”. After exhaustively reviewing collected 200K+ images, we found the descriptions of any human parts can be concluded into limited categories. That is, the *PaSta* category number of each part is limited. Especially, a person may have more than one action simultaneously, thus each part can have multiple *PaSta*, too.
[**Data Collection.**]{} For generality, we collect human-centric activity images by crowdsourcing (30K images paired with rough activity label) as well as existing well-designed datasets [@hico; @hicodet; @vcoco; @openimages; @hcvrd; @pic] (185K images), which are structured around a rich semantic ontology, diversity, and variability of activities. All their annotated persons and objects are extracted for our construction. Finally, we collect more than 200K images of diverse activity categories.
[**Activity Labeling.**]{} Activity categories of *PaSta*Net are chosen according to the most common *human daily activities, interactions with object and person*. Referred to the hierarchical activity structure [@activitynet], common activities in existing datasets [@hico; @vcoco; @hcvrd; @openimages; @AVA; @activitynet; @MPII; @pic] and crowdsourcing labels, we select 156 activities including human-object interactions and body motions from 118K images. According to them, we first clean and reorganize the annotated human and objects from existing datasets and crowdsourcing. Then, we annotate the active persons and the interacted objects in the rest of the images. Thus, *PaSta*Net includes all active human and object bounding boxes of 156 activities.
[**Body Part Box.**]{} To locate the human parts, we use pose estimation [@fang2017rmpe] to obtain the joints of all annotated persons. Then we generate *ten* body part boxes following [@Fang2018Pairwise]. Estimation errors are addressed manually to ensure high-quality annotation. Each part box is centered with a joint, and the box size is pre-defined by scaling the distance between the joints of the neck and pelvis. A joint with confidence higher than 0.7 will be seen as visible. When not all joints can be detected, we use *body knowledge-based rules*. That is, if the neck or pelvis is invisible, we configure the part boxes according to other visible joint groups (head, main body, arms, legs), , if only the upper body is visible, we set the size of the hand box to twice the pupil distance.
![*PaSta* annotation. Based on instance activity labels, we add fine-grained body part boxes and corresponding part states *PaSta* labels. In *PaSta*, we use “something” [@partstate] to indicate the interacted object for generalization. The edge in *Activity Parsing Tree* indicates the statistical co-occurrence.[]{data-label="Figure:pasta-example"}](labeling.pdf){width="45.00000%"}
[***PaSta* Annotation.**]{} We carry out the annotation by crowdsourcing and receive 224,159 annotation uploads. The process is as follows: 1) First, we choose the *PaSta* categories considering the *generalization*. Based on the verbs of 156 activities, we choose 200 verbs from WordNet [@miller1995wordnet] as the *PaSta* candidates, , “hold”, “pick” for hands, “eat”, “talk to” for head, . If a part does not have any active states, we depict it as “no\_action”. 2) Second, to find the most common *PaSta* that can work as the *transferable activity knowledge*, we invite **150** annotators from different backgrounds to annotate 10K images of 156 activities with *PaSta* candidates (Fig. \[Figure:pasta-example\]). For example, given an activity “ride bicycle”, they may describe it as $\langle hip, sit\_on, something\rangle$, $\langle hand, hold, something\rangle$, $\langle foot, step\_on, something\rangle$, . 3) Based on their annotations, we use the Normalized Point-wise Mutual Information (NPMI) [@church1990word] to calculate the co-occurrence between activities and *PaSta* candidates. Finally, we choose **76** candidates with the highest NPMI values as the final *PaSta*. 4) Using the annotations of 10K images as seeds, we automatically generate the initial *PaSta* labels for all of the rest images. Thus the other 210 annotators only need to revise the annotations. 5) Considering that a person may have multiple actions, for *each* action, we annotate its corresponding ten *PaSta* respectively. Then we combine all sets of *PaSta* from all actions. Thus, a part can also have multiple states, , in “eating while talking”, the head has *PaSta* $\langle head, eat, something\rangle$, $\langle head, talk\_to, something\rangle$ and $\langle head, look\_at, something\rangle$ simultaneously. 6) To ensure quality, each image will be annotated twice and checked by automatic procedures and supervisors. We cluster all labels and discard the outliers to obtain robust agreements.
[**Activity Parsing Tree.**]{} To illustrate the relationships between *PaSta* and activities, we use their statistical correlations to construct a graph (Fig. \[Figure:pasta-example\]): activities are root nodes, *PaSta* are son nodes and edges are co-occurrence.
Finally, *PaSta*Net includes **118K+** images, **285K+** persons, **250K+** interacted objects, **724K+** instance activities and **7M+** *PaSta*. Referred to well-designed datasets [@AVA; @activitynet; @hico] and WordNet [@miller1995wordnet], *PaSta* can cover most part situations with good **generalization**. To verify that *PaSta* have encoded common part-level activity knowledge and can adapt to various activities, we adopt two experiments:
[**Coverage Experiment.**]{} To verify that *PaSta* can cover most of the activities, we collect other 50K images out of *PaSta*Net. Those images contain diverse activities and many of them are unseen in *PaSta*Net. Another 100 volunteers from different backgrounds are invited to find human parts that can not be well described by our *PaSta* set. We found that only $2.3 \%$ cases cannot find appropriate descriptions. This verifies that *PaSta*Net is general to activities.
[**Recognition Experiment.**]{} First, we find that *PaSta* can be well **learned**. A shallow model trained with a part of *PaSta*Net can easily achieve about **55** mAP on *PaSta* recognition. Meanwhile, a deeper model can only achieve about 40 mAP on activity recognition with the same data and metric (Sec. \[sec:experiment-hico\]). Second, we argue that *PaSta* can be well **transferred**. To verify this, we conduct transfer learning experiments (Sec. \[sec:transfer\]), first trains a model to learn the knowledge from *PaSta*Net, then use it to infer the activities of unseen datasets, even unseen activities. Results show that *PaSta* can be well transferred and boost the performance (4.2 mAP on image-based AVA). Thus it can be considered as the general part-level activity knowledge.
{width="90.00000%"}
Activity Representation by *PaSta*Net
=====================================
In this section, we discuss the activity representation by *PaSta*Net.
[**Conventional Paradigm**]{} Given an image $I$, conventional methods mainly use a direct mapping (Fig. \[Figure:paradigm\_compare\](a)): $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:previous}
\mathcal{S}_{inst}=\mathcal{F}_{inst}(I, b_h, \mathcal{B}_o)\end{aligned}$$ to infer the action score $\mathcal{S}_{inst}$ with instance-level semantic representations $f_{inst}$. $b_h$ is the human box and $\mathcal{B}_o=\{b_o^i\}^{m}_{i=1}$ are the $m$ interacted object boxes of this person.
[***PaSta*Net Paradigm.**]{} We propose a novel paradigm to utilize general part knowledge: 1) *PaSta* recognition and feature extraction for a person and an interacted object $b_o$: $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:a2v}
f_{PaSta} = \mathcal{R}_{A2V}(I, \mathcal{B}_p, b_o),\end{aligned}$$ where $\mathcal{B}_p=\{b^{(i)}_p\}^{10}_{i}$ are part boxes generated from the pose estimation [@fang2017rmpe] automatically following [@Fang2018Pairwise] (head, upper arms, hands, hip, thighs, feet). $\mathcal{R}_{A2V}(\cdot)$ indicates the Activity2Vec, which extracts ten *PaSta* representations $f_{PaSta}=\{f^{(i)}_{PaSta}\}^{10}_{i=1}$. 2) *PaSta*-based Reasoning (*PaSta-R*), , from *PaSta* to activity semantics: $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:reasoning}
\mathcal{S}_{part} = \mathcal{F}_{PaSta-R}(f_{PaSta}, f_o),\end{aligned}$$ where $\mathcal{F}_{PaSta-R}(\cdot)$ indicates the *PaSta-R*, $f_o$ is the object feature. $\mathcal{S}_{part}$ is the action score of the part-level path. If the person does not interact with any objects, we use the ROI pooling feature of the whole image as $f_o$. For multiple object case, , a person interacts with several objects, we process each human-object pair $(f_{PaSta}, f_o^{(i)})$ respectively and generate its Activity2Vec embedding.
Following, we introduce the *PaSta* recognition in Sec. \[sec:PS\]. Then, we discuss how to map human instance to semantic vector via Activity2Vec in Sec. \[sec:a2v\]. We believe it can be a general activity representation extractor. In Sec. \[sec:pasta-r\], a hierarchical activity graph is proposed to largely advance activity related tasks by leveraging *PaSta*Net.
Part State Recognition {#sec:PS}
----------------------
With the object and body part boxes $b_o, \mathcal{B}_p$, we operate the *PaSta* recognition as shown in Fig. \[Figure:overview\]. In detail, a COCO [@coco] pre-trained Faster R-CNN [@faster] is used as the feature extractor. For each part, we concatenate the part feature $f^{(i)}_p$ from $b^{(i)}_p$ and object features $f_o$ from $b_o$ as inputs. For body only motion, we input the whole image feature $f_c$ as $f_o$. All features will be first input to a **Part Relevance Predictor**. Part relevance represents how important a body part is to the action. For example, feet usually have weak correlations with “drink with cup”. And in “eat apple”, only hands and head are essential. These relevance/attention labels can be converted from *PaSta* labels directly, the attention label will be *one*, unless its *PaSta* label is “no\_action”, which means this part contributes nothing to the action inference. With the part attention labels as supervision, we use part relevance predictor consisting of FC layers and Sigmoids to infer the attentions $\{a_{i}\}^{10}_{i=1}$ of each part. Formally, for a person and an interacted object: $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:part-loss}
a_{i} = \mathcal{P}_{pa}(f^{(i)}_p, f_o),\end{aligned}$$ where $\mathcal{P}_{pa}(\cdot)$ is the part attention predictor. We compute cross-entropy loss $\mathcal{L}^{(i)}_{att}$ for each part and multiply $f^{(i)}_p$ with its scalar attention, $f^{(i)*}_p=f^{(i)}_p \times a_{i}$.
Second, we operate the *PaSta* recognition. For each part, we concatenate the re-weighted $f^{(i)*}_p$ with $f_o$, and input them into a max pooling layer and two subsequent 512 sized FC layers, thus obtain the *PaSta* score $\mathcal{S}^{(i)}_{PaSta}$ for the $i$-th part. Because a part can have multiple states, head performs “eat” and “watch” simultaneously. Hence we use multiple Sigmoids to do this multi-label classification. With *PaSta* labels, we construct cross-entropy loss $\mathcal{L}^{(i)}_{PaSta}$. The total loss of *PaSta* recognition is: $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:part-loss}
\mathcal{L}_{PaSta} = \sum^{10}_{i} (\mathcal{L}^{(i)}_{PaSta} + \mathcal{L}^{(i)}_{att}).\end{aligned}$$
Activity2Vec {#sec:a2v}
------------
In Sec. \[sec:hake-construction\], we define the *PaSta* according to the most common activities. That is, choosing the part-level verbs which are *most often used to compose and describe the activities* by a large number of annotators. Therefore *PaSta* can be seen as the fundamental components of instance activities. Meanwhile, *PaSta* recognition can be well learned. Thus, we can operate *PaSta* recognition on *PaSta*Net to learn the powerful *PaSta* representations, which have good transferability. They can be used to reason out the instance actions in both supervised and transfer learning. Under such circumstance, *PaSta*Net works like the ImageNet [@imagenet]. And *PaSta*Net pre-trained Activity2Vec functions as a knowledge engine and transfers the knowledge to other tasks.
[**Visual *PaSta* feature.**]{} First, we extract visual *PaSta* representations from *PaSta* recognition. Specifically, we extract the feature from the last FC layer in *PaSta* classifier as the visual *PaSta* representation $f^{V(i)}_{PaSta} \in \mathbb{R}^{512}$.
[**Language *PaSta* feature.**]{} Our goal is to bridge the gap between *PaSta* and activity semantics. Language priors are useful in visual concept understanding [@Lu2016Visual; @vinyals2015show]. Thus the combination of visual and language knowledge is a good choice for establishing this mapping. To further enhance the representation ability, we utilize the uncased BERT-Base pre-trained model [@devlin2018bert] as the language representation extractor. Bert [@devlin2018bert] is a language understanding model that considers the context of words and uses a deep bidirectional transformer to extract contextual representations. It is trained with large-scale corpus databases such as Wikipedia, hence the generated embedding contains helpful implicit semantic knowledge about the activity and *PaSta*. For example, the description of the entry “basketball” in Wikipedia: “drag one’s *foot* without *dribbling* the ball, to *carry* it, or to *hold* the ball with both *hands*...*placing* his *hand* on the bottom of the ball;..known as *carrying* the ball”.
In specific, for the $i$-th body part with $n$ *PaSta*, we divide each *PaSta* into tokens $\{t^{(i,k)}_p, t^{(i,k)}_v, t^{(i,k)}_o\}^{n}_{k=1}$, , $\langle part, verb, object\rangle$. The $\langle object \rangle$ comes from object detection. Each *PaSta* will be converted to a $f^{(i,k)}_{Bert} \in \mathbb{R}^{2304}$ (concatenating three 768 sized vectors of part, verb, object), $f^{(i,k)}_{Bert}=\mathcal{R}_{Bert}(t^{(i,k)}_p, t^{(i,k)}_v, t^{(i,k)}_o)$. $\{f^{(i,k)}_{Bert}\}^{n}_{k=1}$ will be concatenated as the $f^{(i)}_{Bert} \in \mathbb{R}^{2304*n}$ for the $i$-th part. Second, we multiply $f^{(i)}_{Bert}$ with predicted *PaSta* probabilities $P^{(i)}_{PaSta}$, $f^{L(i)}_{PaSta}=f^{(i)}_{Bert} \times P^{(i)}_{PaSta}$, where $P^{(i)}_{PaSta}=Sigmoid(\mathcal{S}^{(i)}_{PaSta}) \in \mathbb{R}^{n}$, $\mathcal{S}_{PaSta}^{(i)}$ denotes the *PaSta* score of the $i$-th part, $P_{PaSta}=\{P^{(i)}_{PaSta}\}^{10}_{i=1}$. This means a more possible *PaSta* will get larger attention. $f^{L(i)}_{PaSta} \in \mathbb{R}^{2304*n}$ is the final language *PaSta* feature of the $i$-th part. We use the pre-converted and frozen $f^{(i,k)}_{Bert}$ in the whole process. Additionally, we also try to rewrite each *PaSta* into a sentence and convert it into a fixed-size vector as $f^{(i,k)}_{Bert}$ and the performance is slightly better (Sec. \[sec:ablation\]).
[***PaSta* Representation.**]{} At last, we pool and resize the $f^{L(i)}_{PaSta}$, and concatenate it with its corresponding visual *PaSta* feature $f^{V(i)}_{PaSta}$. Then we obtain the *PaSta* representation $f^{(i)}_{PaSta} \in \mathbb{R}^{m}$ for each body part ($m=4096$). This process is indicated as **Activity2Vec** (Fig. \[Figure:overview\]). The output $f_{PaSta}=\{{f^{(i)}_{PaSta}}\}^{10}_{i=1}$ is the part-level activity representation and can be used for various downstream tasks, activity detection, captioning, . From the experiments, we can find that Activity2Vec has a powerful representational capacity and can significantly improve the performance of activity related tasks. It works like a knowledge transformer with the fundamental *PaSta* to compose various activities.
*PaSta*-based Activity Reasoning {#sec:pasta-r}
--------------------------------
With part-level $f_{PaSta}$, we construct a Hierarchical Activity Graph (HAG) to model the activities. Then we can extract the graph state to reason out the activities.
[**Hierarchical Activity Graph.**]{} \[sec:hag\] Hierarchical activity graph $\mathcal{G} = (\mathcal{V}, \mathcal{E})$ is depicted in Fig. \[Figure:reasoning\]. For human-object interactions, $\mathcal{V} = \{\mathcal{V}_p, \mathcal{V}_o\}$. For body only motions, $\mathcal{V} = \mathcal{V}_p$. In instance level, a person is a node with instance representation from previous instance-level methods [@gao2018ican; @interactiveness; @AVA] as a node feature. Object node $v_o \in \mathcal{V}_o$ and has $f_o$ as node feature. In part level, each body part can be seen as a node $v^{i}_p \in \mathcal{V}_p$ with *PaSta* representation $f^{i}_{PaSta}$ as node feature. Edge between body parts and object is $e_{po} = (v^{i}_p, v_o) \in \mathcal{V}_p \times \mathcal{V}_o$, and edge within parts is $e^{ij}_{pp} = (v^{i}_p, v^{j}_p) \in \mathcal{V}_p \times \mathcal{V}_p$.
![From *PaSta* to activities on hierarchical activity graph.[]{data-label="Figure:reasoning"}](hag.pdf){width="49.00000%"}
Our goal is to parse HAG and reason out the graph state, activities. In part-level, we use *PaSta*-based Activity Reasoning (*PaSta-R*) to infer the activities. That is, with the *PaSta* representation from Activity2Vec, we use $\mathcal{S}_{part} = \mathcal{F}_{PaSta-R}(f_{PaSta}, f_o)$ (Eq. \[eq:reasoning\]) to infer the activity scores $\mathcal{S}_{part}$. For body motion only activities “dance”, Eq. \[eq:reasoning\] is $\mathcal{S}_{part} = \mathcal{F}_{PaSta-R}(f_{PaSta}, f_c)$, $f_c$ is the feature of image. We adopt different implementations of $\mathcal{F}_{PaSta-R}(\cdot)$. [**Linear Combination.**]{} The simplest implementation is to directly combine the part node features linearly. We concatenate the output of Activity2Vec $f_{PaSta}$ with $f_o$ and input them to a FC layer with Sigmoids.
[**MLP.**]{} We can also operate nonlinear transformation on Activity2Vec output. We use two 1024 sized FC layers and an action category sized FC with Sigmoids.
[**Graph Convolution Network.**]{} With part-level graph, we use Graph Convolution Network (GCN) [@gcn] to extract the global graph feature and use an MLP subsequently.
[**Sequential Model.**]{} When watching an image in this way: watch body part and object patches with language description one by one, human can easily guess the actions. Inspired by this, we adopt an LSTM [@lstm] to take the part node features ${f^{(i)}_{PaSta}}$ gradually, and use the output of the last time step to classify actions. We adopt two input orders: random and fixed (from head to foot), and fixed order is better.
[**Tree-Structured Passing.**]{} Human body has a natural hierarchy. Thus we use a tree-structured graph passing. Specifically, we first combine the hand and upper arm nodes into an “arm” node, its feature is obtained by concatenating the features of three son nodes and passed a 512 sized FC layer. Similarly, we combine the foot and thigh nodes to an “leg” node. Head, arms, legs and feet nodes together form the second level. The third level contains the “upper body“ (head, arms) and “lower-body” (hip, legs). Finally, the body node is generated. We input it and the object node into an MLP.
![An analogy to activity recognition.[]{data-label="Figure:analogy"}](mnist.pdf){width="45.00000%"}
The instance-level graph inference can be operated by instance-based methods [@Fang2018Pairwise; @gao2018ican; @interactiveness; @AVA] using Eq. \[eq:previous\]: $\mathcal{S}_{inst}=\mathcal{F}_{inst}(I, b_h, \mathcal{B}_o)$. To get the final result upon the whole graph, we can use either early or late fusion. In early fusion, we concatenate $f_{inst}$ with $f_{PaSta},f_o$ and input them to *PaSta-R*. In late fusion, we fuse the predictions of two levels, $\mathcal{S} = \mathcal{S}_{inst} + \mathcal{S}_{part}$. In our test, late fusion outperforms early fusion in most cases. If not specified, we use late fusion in Sec. \[sec:experiments\]. We use $\mathcal{L}^{inst}_{cls}$ and $\mathcal{L}^{PaSta}_{cls}$ to indicate the cross-entropy losses of two levels. The total loss is: $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:total-loss}
\mathcal{L}_{total} = \mathcal{L}_{PaSta} + \mathcal{L}^{PaSta}_{cls} + \mathcal{L}^{inst}_{cls}.\end{aligned}$$
Experiments {#sec:experiments}
===========
An analogy: MNIST-Action
------------------------
We design a simplified experiment to give an intuition (Fig. \[Figure:analogy\]). We randomly sample MNIST digits from 0 to 9 ($28 \times 28 \times 1$) and generate $128 \times 128 \times 1$ images consists of 3 to 5 digits. Each image is given a label to indicate *the sum of the two largest numbers* within it (0 to 18). We assume that “*PaSta*-Activity” resembles the “Digits-Sum”. Body parts can be seen as digits, thus human is the union box of all digits. To imitate the complex body movements, digits are randomly distributed, and Gaussian noise is added to the images. For comparison, we adopt two simple networks. For instance-level model, we input the ROI pooling feature of the digit union box into an MLP. For hierarchical model, we operate single-digit recognition, then concatenate the union box and digit features and input them to an MLP (early fusion), or use late fusion to combine scores of two levels. Early fusion achieves 43.7 accuracy and shows significant superiority over instance-level method (10.0). And late fusion achieves a preferable accuracy of 44.2. Moreover, the part-level method *only* without fusion also obtains an accuracy of 41.4. This supports our assumption about the effectiveness of part-level representation.
Image-based Activity Recognition {#sec:experiment-hico}
--------------------------------
Usually, Human-Object Interactions (HOIs) often take up most of the activities, , more than 70% activities in large-scale datasets [@AVA; @activitynet; @Kinetics] are HOIs. To evaluate *PaSta*Net, we perform image-based HOI recognition on HICO [@hico]. HICO has 38,116 and 9,658 images in train and test sets and 600 HOIs composed of 117 verbs and 80 COCO objects [@coco]. Each image has an image-level label which is the aggregation over all HOIs in an image and does not contain any instance boxes.
[**Modes.**]{} We first pre-train Activity2Vec with *PaSta* labels, then fine-tune Activity2Vec and *PaSta-R* together on HICO train set. In pre-training and finetuning, we **exclude** the HICO testing data in *PaSta*Net to avoid data pollution. We
adopt different data mode to pre-train Activity2Vec: 1) **“*PaSta*Net\*”** mode (38K images): we use the images in HICO train set and their *PaSta* labels. The [**only additional supervision**]{} here is the *PaSta* annotations compared to conventional way. 2) **“GT-*PaSta*Net\*”** mode (38K images): the data used is same with **“*PaSta*Net\*”**. To verify the **upper bound** of our method, we use the ground truth *PaSta* (binary labels) as the predicted *PaSta* probabilities in Activity2Vec. This means we can recognize *PaSta* perfectly and reason out the activities from the best starting point. 3) **“*PaSta*Net”** mode (118K images): we use all *PaSta*Net images with *PaSta* labels except the HICO testing data.
[**Settings.**]{} We use *image-level PaSta* labels to train Activity2Vec. Each image-level *PaSta* label is the aggregation over all existing *PaSta* of all active persons in an image. For *PaSta* recognition, , we compute the mAP for the *PaSta* categories of each part, and compute the *mean* mAP of all parts. To be fair, we use the person, body part and object boxes from [@Fang2018Pairwise] and VGG-16 [@vgg] as the backbone. The batch size is 16 and the initial learning rate is 1e-5. We use SGD optimizer with momentum (0.9) and cosine decay restarts [@cosinelr] (the first decay step is 5000). The pre-training costs 80K iterations and fine-tuning costs 20K iterations. Image-level *PaSta* and HOI predictions are all generated via Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) [@Maron1998A] of 3 persons and 4 objects. We choose previous methods [@Mallya2016Learning; @Fang2018Pairwise] as the instance-level path in the hierarchical model, and uses late fusion. Particularly, [@Fang2018Pairwise] uses part-pair appearance and location but not part-level *semantics*, thus we still consider it as a baseline to get a more abundant comparison.
[**Results.**]{} Results are reported in Tab. \[table:all\]. ***PaSta*Net\*** mode methods all outperform the instance-level method. The part-level method solely achieves 44.5 mAP and shows good complementarity to the instance-level. Their fusion can boost the performance to 45.9 mAP (**6** mAP improvement). And the gap between [@Fang2018Pairwise] and [@Mallya2016Learning] is largely narrowed from 3.8 to 0.9 mAP. Activity2Vec achieves **55.9** mAP on *PaSta* recognition in ***PaSta*Net\*** mode: **46.3** (head), **66.8** (arms), **32.0** (hands), **68.6** (hip), **56.2** (thighs), **65.8** (feet). This verifies that *PaSta* can be better learned than activities, thus they can be learned ahead as the basis for reasoning. In **GT-*PaSta*Net\*** mode, hierarchical paradigm achieves **65.6** mAP. This is a powerful proof of the effectiveness of *PaSta* knowledge. Thus what remains to do is to improve the *PaSta* recognition and further promote the activity task performance. Moreover, in ***PaSta*Net** mode, we achieve relative **16**% improvement. On few-shot sets, our best result significantly improves **13.9** mAP, which strongly proves the reusability and transferability of *PaSta*.
Instance-based Activity Detection {#subsec:exp-HICO-DET}
---------------------------------
We further conduct instance-based activity detection on HICO-DET [@hicodet], which needs to locate human and object and classify the actions simultaneously. HICO-DET [@hicodet] is a benchmark built on HICO [@hico] and add human and object bounding boxes. We choose several state-of-the-arts [@gao2018ican; @Gkioxari2017Detecting; @qi2018learning; @interactiveness] to compare and cooperate.
[**Settings.**]{} We use *instance-level PaSta* labels, each annotated person with the corresponding *PaSta* labels, to train Acitivty2Vec, and fine-tune Activity2Vec and *PaSta-R* together on HICO-DET. All testing data are excluded from pre-training and fine-tining. We follow the mAP metric of [@hicodet], true positive contains accurate human and object boxes ($IoU>0.5$ with reference to ground truth) and accurate action prediction. The metric for *PaSta* detection is similar, , estimated part box and *PaSta* action prediction all have to be accurate. The mAP of each part and the *mean* mAP are calculated. For a fair comparison, we use the object detection from [@gao2018ican; @interactiveness] and ResNet-50[@resnet] as backbone. We use SGD with momentum (0.9) and cosine decay restart [@cosinelr] (the first decay step is 80K). The pre-training and fine-tuning take 1M and 2M iterations respectively. The learning rate is 1e-3 and the ratio of positive and negative samples is 1:4. A late fusion strategy is adopted. Three modes in Sec. \[sec:experiment-hico\] and different *PaSta-R* are also evaluated.
[**Results.**]{} Results are shown in Tab. \[tab:hico-det\]. All ***PaSta*Net\*** mode methods significantly outperform the instance-level methods, which strongly prove the improvement from the learned *PaSta* information. In ***PaSta*Net\*** mode, the *PaSta* detection performance are 30.2 mAP: 25.8 (head), 44.2 (arms), 17.5 (hands), 41.8 (hip), 22.2 (thighs), 29.9 (feet). This again verifies that *PaSta* can be well learned. And **GT-*PaSta*Net\*** (upper bound) and ***PaSta*Net** (more *PaSta* labels) modes both greatly boosts the performance. On Rare sets, our method obtains **7.7** mAP improvement.
Transfer Learning with Activity2Vec {#sec:transfer}
-----------------------------------
To verify the transferability of *PaSta*Net, we design transfer learning experiments on large-scale benchmarks: V-COCO [@vcoco], HICO-DET [@hicodet] and AVA [@AVA]. We first use *PaSta*Net to **pre-train** Activity2Vec and *PaSta-R* with 156 activities and *PaSta* labels. Then we change the last FC in *PaSta-R* to fit the activity categories of the target benchmark. Finally, we freeze Activity2Vec and fine-tune *PaSta-R* on the train set of the target dataset. Here, *PaSta*Net works like the ImageNet [@imagenet] and Activity2Vec is used as a pre-trained knowledge engine to promote other tasks.
[**V-COCO.**]{} V-COCO contains 10,346 images and instance boxes. It has 29 action categories, COCO 80 objects [@coco]. For a fair comparison, we [**exclude**]{} the images of V-COCO and corresponding *PaSta* labels in *PaSta*Net, and use remaining data (109K images) for pre-training. We use SGD with 0.9 momenta and cosine decay restarts [@cosinelr] (the first decay is 80K). The pre-training costs 300K iterations with the learning rate as 1e-3. The fine-tuning costs 80K iterations with the learning rate as 7e-4. We select state-of-the-arts [@vcoco; @Gkioxari2017Detecting; @qi2018learning; @gao2018ican; @interactiveness] as baselines and adopt the metric $AP_{role}$ [@vcoco] (requires accurate human and object boxes and action prediction). Late fusion strategy is adopted. With the domain gap, *PaSta*Net still improves the performance by 3.2 mAP (Tab. \[tab:vcoco\].).
[**Image-based AVA.**]{} AVA contains 430 video clips with spatio-temporal labels. It includes 80 atomic actions consists of body motions and HOIs. We utilize all *PaSta*Net data (118K images) for pre-training. Considering that *PaSta*Net is built upon still images, we use the **frames per second** as *still images* for **image-based** instance activity detection. We adopt ResNet-50 [@resnet] as backbone and SGD with momentum of 0.9. The initial learning rate is 1e-2 and the first decay of cosine decay restarts [@cosinelr] is 350K. For a fair comparison, we use the human box from [@lfb]. The pre-training costs 1.1M iterations and fine-tuning costs 710K iterations. We adopt the metric from [@AVA], mAP of the top 60 most common action classes, using IoU threshold of 0.5 between detected human box and the ground truth and accurate action prediction. For comparison, we adopt a image-based baseline: Faster R-CNN detector [@faster] with
ResNet-101 [@resnet] provided by the AVA website [@ava_tf_baseline]. Recent works mainly use a spatial-temporal model such as I3D [@Kinetics]. Although *unfair*, we still employ two video-based baselines [@lfb] as instance-level models to cooperate with the part-level method via late fusion. Results are listed in Tab. \[tab:ava\]. Both image and video based methods cooperated with *PaSta*Net achieve impressive improvements, even our model is trained **without temporal information**. Considering the huge domain gap (films) and unseen activities, this result strongly proves its great *generalization ability*.
[**HICO-DET.**]{} We exclude the images of HICO-DET and the corresponding *PaSta* labels, and use left data (71K images) for pre-training. The test setting in same with Sec. \[subsec:exp-HICO-DET\]. The pre-training and fine-tuning cost 300K and 1.3M iterations. *PaSta*Net shows good transferability and achieve 3.25 mAP improvement on Default Full set (20.28 mAP).
Ablation Study {#sec:ablation}
--------------
We design ablation studies on HICO-DET with TIN [@interactiveness]+*PaSta\**-Linear (22.12 mAP). [**1) w/o Part Attention**]{} degrades the performance with 0.21 mAP. [**2) Language Feature:**]{} We replace the *PaSta* Bert feature in Activity2Vec with: Gaussian noise, Word2Vec [@word2vec] and GloVe [@glove]. The results are all worse (20.80, 21.95, 22.01 mAP). If we change the *PaSta* triplet $\langle part, verb, sth \rangle$ into a sentence and convert it to Bert vector, this vector performs sightly better (22.26 mAP). This is probably because the sentence carries more contextual information.
Conclusion
==========
In this paper, to make a step toward human activity knowledge engine, we construct *PaSta*Net to provide novel body part-level activity representation (*PaSta*). Meanwhile, a knowledge transformer Activity2Vec and a part-based reasoning method *PaSta-R* are proposed. *PaSta*Net brings in interpretability and new possibility for activity understanding. It can effectively bridge the semantic gap between pixels and activities. With *PaSta*Net, we significantly boost the performance in supervised and transfer learning tasks, especially under few-shot circumstances. In the future, we plan to enrich our *PaSta*Net with spatio-temporal *PaSta*.
#### Acknowledgement:
This work is supported in part by the National Key R&D Program of China, No. 2017YFA0700800, National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 61772332 and Shanghai Qi Zhi Institute.
{width="\linewidth"}
\(a) *PaSta* of foot
{width="\linewidth"}
\(b) *PaSta* of hand
Image Human-Instance Object-Instance Activity *PaSta* Existing-Datasets Crowdsourcing
--------- ---------------- ----------------- ---------- ----------- ------------------- ---------------
118,995 285,921 250,621 724,855 7,248,550 95,027 23,968
{width="100.00000%"}
Dataset Details
===============
In this section, we give a more detailed introduction of our knowledge base *PaSta*Net, covering characteristics and the annotator backgrounds.
Characteristics of *Pasta*Net
-----------------------------
Tab. \[table:statistics\] shows some characteristics of *PaSta*Net. Now *PaSta*Net contains about 118K+ images and the corresponding instance-level and human part-level annotations. To give an intuitive presentation of our *PaSta*, we use t-SNE [@tsne] to visualize the part-level features of some typical *PaSta* samples in Fig. \[Figure:t-SNE\]. We use the human body part patches with different colored borders to replace the embedding points in Fig. \[Figure:t-SNE\], the embeddings of “hand holds something” and “foot kicks something”.
HOIs adjust, assemble, block, blow, board, break, brush with, board gaming, buy, carry, catch, chase, check, chop, clean, clink glass, close, control, cook, cut, cut with, dig, direct, drag, dribble, drink with, drive, dry, eat, eat at, enter, exit, extract, feed, fill, flip, flush, fly, fight, fishing, give sth to sb, grab, greet, grind, groom, hand shake, herd, hit, hold, hop on, hose, hug, hunt, inspect, install, jump, kick, kiss, lasso, launch, lick, lie on, lift, light, listen to sth, listen to a person, load, lose, make, milk, move, open, operate, pack, paint, park, pay, peel, pet, play musical instrument, play with sb, play with pets, pick, pick up, point, pour, press, pull, push, put down, put on, race, read, release, repair, ride, row, run, sail, scratch, serve, set, shear, shoot, shovel, sign, sing to sb, sip, sit at, sit on, slide, smell, smoke, spin, squeeze, stab, stand on, stand under, stick, stir, stop at, straddle, swing, tag, take a photo, take sth from sb, talk on, talk to, teach, text on, throw, tie, toast, touch, train, turn, type on, walk, wash, watch, wave, wear, wield, work on laptop, write, zip
-------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Body Motions bow, clap, climb, crawl, dance, fall, get up, kneel, physical exercise, swim
Objects airplane, apple, backpack, banana, baseball bat, baseball glove, bear, bed, bench, bicycle, bird, boat, book, bottle, bowl, broccoli, bus, cake, car, carrot, cat, cell phone, chair, clock, couch, cow, cup, dining table, dog, donut, elephant, fire hydrant, fork, frisbee, giraffe, hair drier, handbag, horse, hot dog, keyboard, kite, knife, laptop, microwave, motorcycle, mouse, orange, oven, parking meter, person, pizza, potted plant, refrigerator, remote, sandwich, scissors, sheep, sink, skateboard, skis, snowboard, spoon, sports ball, stop sign, suitcase, surfboard, teddy bear, tennis racket, tie, toaster, toilet, toothbrush, traffic light, train, truck, tv, umbrella, vase, wine glass, zebra
Head eat, inspect, talk with sth, talk to, close with, kiss, raise up, lick, blow, drink with, smell, wear, no action
------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arm carry, close to, hug, swing, no action
Hand hold, carry, reach for, touch, put on, twist, wear, throw, throw out, write on, point with, point to, use sth to point to, press, squeeze, scratch, pinch, gesture to, push, pull, pull with sth, wash, wash with sth, hold in both hands, lift, raise, feed, cut with sth, catch with sth, pour into, no action
Hip sit on, sit in, sit beside, close with, no action
Thigh walk with, walk to, run with, run to, jump with, close with, straddle, jump down, walk away, no action
Foot stand on, step on, walk with, walk to, run with, run to, dribble, kick, jump down, jump with, walk away, no action
Annotator Backgrounds
---------------------
There are about 360 annotators have participated in the construction of *Pasta*Net. They have various backgrounds, thus we can ensure annotation diversity and reduce the bias. The specific information is shown in Fig. \[Figure:background\].
Selected Activities and *PaSta*
===============================
{width="70.00000%"}
{width="95.00000%"}
We list all selected 156 activities and 76 *PaSta* in Tab. \[tab:action\] and Tab. \[tab:pasta\]. *PaSta*Net contains both person-object/person interactions and body only motions, which cover the vast majority of human daily life activities. And all the annotated interacted objects in interactions all belong to COCO 80 object categories [@coco].
Activity and *PaSta*
--------------------
*PaSta*Net can provide abundant activity knowledge for both instance and part levels and help construct a large-scale activity parsing tree, as seen in Fig. \[Figure:rel\_part\]. Moreover, we can represent the parsing tree as a co-occurrence matrix of the activities and *PaSta*. A part of the matrix is depicted in Fig. \[Figure:rel\_part1\].
{width="80.00000%"}
{width="80.00000%"}
Additional Details of *PaSta*-R
===============================
Fig. \[Figure:reasoning-model\] gives more details about the different *PaSta*-R implementations, directly input the Activity2Vec output to the Linear Combination, MLP or GCN [@gcn], sequential LSTM-based model and the tree-structured passing model.
Additional Details of MNIST-Action
==================================
In this section, we provide some details of the MNIST-Action experiment. The instance-based and hierarchical models are shown in Fig. \[Figure:mnist\]. The train and test set sizes are 5,000 and 800. In the instance-based model, we directly use the ROI pooling feature of the digit union box to predict the target (summation of the largest and second largest numbers). We use optimizer RMSProp and the initial learning rate is 0.0001. The batch size is 16 and we train the model 1K epochs. In the hierarchical model, we first operate the single digit recognition and then use single digit features (part features) together with the instance feature to infer the sum (early fusion). If using late fusion, we directly fuse the scores of instance branch and part branch. We also use optimizer RMSProp and the initial learning rate is 0.001. The batch size is 32 and the training also costs 1K epochs. Two models are all implemented with 4 convolution layers with subsequent fully-connect layers.
\[!ht\]
{width="80.00000%"}
Results are shown in Fig. \[Figure:loss\_acc\]. We can find that the hierarchical method largely outperforms the instance-based method.
{width="90.00000%"}
Effectiveness on Few-shot Problems
==================================
In this section, we show more detailed results on HICO [@hico] to illustrate the effectiveness of *Pasta* on few-shot problems. We divide the 600 HOIs into different sets according to their training sample numbers. On HICO [@hico], there is an obvious positive correlation between performance and the number of training samples. From Fig. \[Figure:few\] we can find that our hierarchical method outperforms the previous state-of-the-art [@Fang2018Pairwise] on all sets, especially on the few-shot sets.
Additional Activity Detection Results
=====================================
We report visualized *PaSta* and activity predictions of our method in Figure \[Figure:vis\]. The $\langle body\_part, part\_verb, object\rangle$ with the highest scores are visualized in blue, green and red boxes, and their corresponding *PaSta* descriptions are demonstrated under each image with colors consisted with boxes. The final activity predictions with the highest scores are also represented. We can find that our model is capable to detect various kinds of activities covering interactions with various objects.
Data usage
==========
The data usages of pre-training and finetuning are clarified in Tab. \[tab:a2v\]. We have carefully excluded the testing data in all pre-training and finetuning to avoid data pollution.
[^1]: Cewu Lu is the corresponding author, member of Qing Yuan Research Institute and MoE Key Lab of Artificial Intelligence, AI Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: |
The Keck I telescope and the High Resolution Echelle Spectrometer (HIRES) have been used to obtain spectra for red giant stars belonging to the Draco, Sextans and Ursa Minor dwarf spheroidal (dSph) galaxies. An analysis of these spectra is presented, along with abundance ratios for more than 20 elements. The resulting database of element abundances for 17 dSph stars is the most extensive yet assembled for stars in such environments. Our principal findings are summarized as follows: (1) There is unambiguous evidence for a large internal dispersion in metallicity in all three galaxies: our program stars span a range of ${\Delta}$\[Fe/H\] = 1.53, 1.40 and 0.73 dex in Draco, Sextans and Ursa Minor, respectively. (2) The abundance patterns among the dSph stars are remarkably uniform, suggesting that three galaxies have similar nucleosynthetic histories and, presumably, similar initial mass functions. (3) A comparison of the measured element abundance ratios for our sample of dSph stars with published values for Galactic halo and disk field stars suggests that the dSph galaxies have $0.02 \lae$ \[$\alpha$/Fe\] $\lae$ 0.13 dex, whereas the halo field star sample has \[$\alpha$/Fe\] $\sim$ 0.28 dex over the same range in metallicity. (4) The most metal-rich dSph stars in our sample have \[Y/Fe\] abundances which are significantly lower than those measured for halo field stars of similar metallicity, while the measured \[Ba/Eu\] ratios for the dSph stars suggest that the early chemical evolution of these galaxies was dominated by the r-process. Taken together, these results suggest that the Galactic halo is unlikely to have assembled, [*in its entirety*]{}, through the disruption of dwarf galaxies similar to the low-luminosity, $\langle L_V \rangle = 3\times10^5L_{V,{\odot}}$, dSphs studied here. We also note that the measured \[Zn/Fe\] abundance ratios for the dSph stars exceed those of damped Ly$\alpha$ systems having low levels of dust depletion by roughly an order of magnitude.
The first high-resolution abundance analysis for the distant Galactic globular cluster NGC 2419 is also presented. From a HIRES spectrum of a single red giant, we find a metallicity of \[Fe/H\] = $-2.32\pm0.11$ dex. This is slightly lower than, but still consistent with, published estimates based on low-resolution spectroscopy. With the possible exception of a slight enhancement in the abundances of some heavy elements such as Ce, Nd, Y and Ba, the observed abundance pattern closely resembles those exhibited by red giants in M92: a nearby, well-studied globular cluster of nearly identical metallicity.
author:
- 'Matthew D. Shetrone'
- Patrick Côté
- 'W.L.W Sargent'
title: 'Abundance Patterns in the Draco, Sextans and Ursa Minor Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies'
---
Introduction
============
As isolated, low-mass systems, dwarf galaxies are probably the closest approximations in Nature to idealized “closed” or “leaky box” models of chemical enrichment. The old, nearby dwarf satellites of the Milky Way thus offer a unique opportunity to study the formation and chemical evolution of galaxies in a level of detail which will never be possible with high-redshift systems.
The apparent dearth of gas and young stars in the Galactic dwarf spheroidal (dSph) galaxies, coupled with their low metallicities, led early researchers to regard them as similar to globular clusters in terms of their stellar populations ($e.g.$, Hodge 1971), despite clear differences in their respective structural parameters. However, careful scrutiny has now revealed these systems to be far from simple. Mateo (1998) recently reviewed the now overwhelming observational evidence for complex and varied star formation histories in these faint systems. High-precision photometric studies, and low-resolution spectroscopy of individual red giant branch (RGB) stars, has firmly established that both Galactic and M31 dSph galaxies show evidence for large internal metallicity variations ($e.g.$, Zinn 1978; Stetson 1984; Suntzeff et al. 1993; Côté, Oke & Cohen 1999; Da Costa et al. 2000). Recently, Shetrone, Bolte & Stetson (1998; hereafter SBS) presented an abundance analysis for four RGB stars belonging to the Draco dSph galaxy: the first study of dSph stars to make use of high-resolution ($R$ = 34,000) spectroscopy. SBS measured abundance ratios for a variety of elements and, despite the limited sample size, found unmistakable evidence for a wide range in metallicity of $-3 \lae$ \[Fe/H\] $\lae -1.5$ dex.
Elemental abundances represent a potentially powerful means of testing the suggestion that dwarf galaxies are the surviving “building blocks” from which larger galaxies formed (Larson 1988; Zinn 1993). Such tests are particularly topical in view of the emerging empirical and analytical evidence that galactic halos are assembled from chemically-distinct, low-mass fragments ($e.g.$, Searle & Zinn 1978; Zinn 1993; Ibata et al. 1994; Klypin et al. 1999; Moore et al. 1999; Côté et al. 2000; Yanny et al. 2000). Some hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy formation also point to the assembly of large galaxies from low-mass, gas-rich, proto-galactic fragments ($i.e.$, Haehnelt, Steinmetz & Rauch 1998; 2000). If these gaseous fragments are the high-redshift analogs of local dwarf galaxies, then a correspondence between the abundance patterns of the dSphs and those of damped Ly$\alpha$ (DLA) absorbers might be expected; such a correspondence in the [*mean*]{} metallicities has been known for some time (see Pettini et al. 1997 and references therein), although the association of DLA systems with spiral disks (Wolfe et al. 1995; Prochaska & Wolfe 1997) or dwarf galaxies (York et al. 1986; Tyson 1988; Pettini, Boksenberg & Hunstead 1990) remains an open question. By examining the abundance patterns of dSph galaxies, and comparing with those of DLA systems and Galactic halo/disk field stars, it may be possible to discriminate between these different scenarios.
In this paper, we build upon the initial study of SBS by analyzing high-resolution spectra for an expanded sample of RGB stars belonging to the Draco, Sextans and Ursa Minor dSph galaxies, as well as for a single red giant in the distant globular cluster NGC 2419. We compare the element abundance ratios measured for our sample of dSph stars to those of Galactic halo/disk field stars and DLA absorbers having low levels of dust depletion.
Observations and Reductions
===========================
Selection of Program Stars
--------------------------
RGB stars belonging to three Galactic dSph galaxies ($i.e.$, Draco, Sextans and Ursa Minor) were selected from a combination of published color-magnitude diagrams, new unpublished magnitudes (Stetson 2000, private communication and Cudworth 2000, private communication) and radial velocity catalogs ($e.g.$, Da Costa et al. 1991; Suntzeff et al. 1993; Stetson 1979, 1984; Armandroff, Olszewski & Pryor 1995). Published radial velocities were used to ensure that only [*bona fide*]{} members of their respective galaxies were targeted for observation with HIRES, the High Resolution Echelle Spectrometer on the Keck I 10m telescope (Vogt et al. 1994).
Color magnitude diagrams for the three dSph galaxies studied here are shown in Figure 1. RGB stars for which we have HIRES spectra are indicated by the large symbols. These three galaxies contain little or no gas (Blitz & Robishaw 2000) and are comprised predominantly of old stars, although Mateo, Fischer & Krzeminski (1995 report the presence of a modest intermediate-age population in Sextans. The four Draco red giants observed by SBS are also shown in Figure 1, as we have re-analyzed their spectra here (see §4). The lower right panel of Figure 1 shows the distribution of our sample of RGB stars in the $M_V$-$(B$-$V)_0$ plane. The dashed lines in this panel show 13 Gyr isochrones from Bergbusch & VandenBerg (1992) having metallicities of \[Fe/H\] = $-2.26$, $-1.66$ and $-1.26$ dex.
HIRES Spectroscopy
------------------
HIRES spectra for 13 RGB stars belonging to the Draco, Ursa Minor and Sextans dSph galaxies were acquired during three observing runs at the Keck I telescope. During the March 1999 observing run, we also obtained a spectrum of a single red giant in the outer-halo globular cluster NGC 2419. A number of bright RGB stars belonging to the nearby, well-studied globular clusters M92 and M3 were also observed during the March 1999 and July 1999 observing runs, in order to compare our measured abundances with those of previous high-resolution spectroscopic studies. An observing log for these observations is presented in Table 1. For each run, we used the C5 decker to produce a 115$\times$7$^{\prime\prime}$ slit and a spectral resolution of ${\lambda} / {\Delta}{\lambda}$ = 34,000. In all cases, the detector was binned 1$\times$2 in the spatial direction in order to reduce the read noise. Spectra obtained during the July 1999 and August 1999 observing runs span the wavelength region $4540 \lae \lambda\lambda \lae 7020$ Å; different echelle and cross disperser angles were used during the March 1999 observations, giving a wavelength coverage of $3850 \lae \lambda\lambda \lae 6300$ Å. The raw spectra were reduced using the MAKEE software package (Tom Barlow, private communication), and wavelength-calibrated within the IRAF environment.
Table 2 summarizes several properties of the program stars. From left to right, this table records the star name, $V$ magnitude, $(B-V)$ color, interstellar extinction, HIRES exposure time, signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) measured at the continuum near $\lambda \simeq$ 6100 $\rm \AA$, and heliocentric Julian date. The final column records the heliocentric radial velocity of each star, measured directly from the spectra with the velocity zero-point established using telluric lines (see Shetrone 1994). References for the photometry are given in the notes to the table. For all objects, the adopted reddening is taken from the DIRBE reddening maps of Schlegel, Finkbeiner & Davis (1998).
Analysis
========
The lines chosen for the abundance analysis were adopted from several sources, including Blackwell et al. (1982), Blackwell et al. (1986), Bizzarri et al. (1993), Fuhrmann et al. (1995), McWilliam et al. (1995; M95), Kraft et al. (1995), Shetrone (1996), Sneden et al. (1996), Carretta & Gratton (1997), and the National Institute of Standards and Technology Atomic Spectra Database. In some cases, the line choices differ from those of SBS, mainly in the addition of more and better lines for Ti I, Ti II, Mg I and several rare earth elements. Equivalent widths (EWs) were measured from Gaussian fits to individual spectra lines. Table 3 lists the measured EWs and adopted line parameters for each of the elements considered below.
Figure 2 shows a comparison of our EWs for the M92 and M3 RGB stars which we have in common with Sneden et al. (1991) and Kraft et al. (1992). There is a essentially no offset, $\Delta$EW = $1.6{\pm}1.2$ mÅ, between the two datasets, and the rms scatter of ${\sigma}$ = $7.1$ m$\rm \AA$ is consistent with the errors expected from uncertainties of the individual measurements. These results are consistent with those found in SBS.
Initial temperature estimates were made using the colors and reddenings from Table 2, using the de-reddened colors, $(B-V)_0$, and our own $(B-V)_0$-T$_{\rm eff}$ calibration for red giants with metallicities in the range $-3.0 \le$ \[Fe/H\] $\le -1.0$ dex. These initial estimates were based on rough approximations of the metallicities of the program stars based upon their location in the color magnitude diagrams. This estimate was then fine-tuned in two ways. First, the metallicity from the first iteration was fed back into our color temperature estimate and the entire process was repeated until we converged upon a best color temperature. Second, we adjusted the color temperature by: (1) demanding a minimized slope, to within the errors, in the plots of Fe abundance (from Fe I) versus both excitation potential and equivalent width and; (2) requiring that the abundance of the [*ionized*]{} species equal that of the [*neutral*]{} species (based largely upon Fe I and Fe II, and to a lesser extent, Ti I and Ti II). In making this minimization, the microturbulent velocity, effective temperature and surface gravity were adjusted iteratively.
Among the sample of reference stars in M92 and M3, the largest deviation between the initial and final adopted parameters were ${\Delta}{\rm T}_{\rm eff}$ = 75 K and ${\Delta}{\log{g}}$ = 0.10 dex for the effective temperature and surface gravity, respectively. Even in the case of the much lower S/N spectrum of the red giant RH-10 in NGC 2419, the deviations were only $-25$ K and 0.1 dex. For the sample of dSph stars, the largest deviation from the predicted temperature was 175 K for Ursa Minor K. This giant has obvious C$_2$ bands which reveal it to be a carbon star; it is not surprising that the color temperature based upon non-carbon stars would predict a significantly cooler temperature than the actual spectroscopic effective temperature. Excluding this star, the average differences between the predicted and adopted temperatures were +63$\pm$18, +38$\pm$25 and +22$\pm$18 K in Ursa Minor, Draco and Sextans, respectively. The differences in the predicted versus adopted surface gravities are $-0.1\pm0.1$ $0.0\pm0.2$ and and $-0.15\pm0.1$ dex. These slight differences in the stellar parameters could arise in several ways: a slight underestimation (0.02 mag) of the true reddenings, the use of a halo star $(B-V)_0$-T$_{\rm eff}$ relation for the dSph giants (see §5.1), systematic errors in the unpublished photometry, or a systematic error due to working with low-S/N spectra. We reject this last possibility because the predicted and adopted parameters for NGC 2419 RH-10, which has a lower S/N ratio than the majority of the dSph spectra, are in excellent agreement, while the dSph giants having the highest S/N spectra ($i.e.$, those in Ursa Minor) exhibit the largest deviations.
Model atmospheres were taken from the computations of the MARCS code (Gustafsson et al. 1975), and the abundance calculations were performed using the current version of Sneden’s (1973) LTE line analysis and spectrum synthesis code. The procedures are nearly identical to those employed in SBS, except for the modified line list. Since some important lines were added, we have re-analyzed the Draco giants from SBS and included the results in this paper. It is important to note that, as with most high-resolution spectroscopic analyses of metal-poor stars using the MARCS models, we have compensated for the increased electron contribution from the overabundant alpha elements by slightly increasing the overall metallicity (+0.1 dex) of the model atmospheres. This compensation for alpha element enhancement will be discussed further in §5.1. The best-fit model parameters for each star, along with the measured EWs, are recorded in Table 3.
Note that several of the elements in our analysis ($e.g.$, V, Mn, Ba, Eu) are known to exhibit hyper-fine splitting. We have not included this hyper-fine splitting in our analysis because our goal is the measurement of overall abundance [*differences*]{}, not absolute abundances. The magnitude of the correction is small in comparison to the EW measurement errors: $i.e.$, for \[Ba/Fe\] the effect is only 0.02 dex.
Abundances
==========
The first important result of this work is the overall abundance spread within the three dSph galaxies. In Figure 1, the alpha-enhanced isochrones of Bergbusch & VandenBerg (1992) are overlaid on the color-magnitude diagrams, with our sample of dSph stars indicated. If the galaxies are comprised primarily of old and coeval stars, and if the photometric uncertainties are negligible, then a metallicity range of $-2.5 \lae$ \[Fe/H\] $\lae -1.5$ dex can be expected in all three galaxies. As Table 4 shows, our measured abundances are roughly consistent with this expectation: $i.e.$, we find metallicity ranges of $\Delta$\[Fe/H\] $\simeq$ 1.53, 1.40 and 0.73 dex, respectively, for Draco, Sextans and Ursa Minor. Moreover, the stars with the lowest abundances are found close to the blue edge of the color distribution, as expected. A more detailed isochrone-age analysis is beyond the scope of this paper since, as discussed in §5.1, the current set of alpha-enhanced isochrones may not be entirely appropriate for these galaxies.
The weighted mean metallicities of the three dSph samples are $\langle$\[Fe/H\]$\rangle$ = $-2.00\pm0.21$, $-1.90\pm0.11$ and $-2.07\pm0.21$ dex for Draco, Ursa Minor and Sextans, respectively. Despite the small sample sizes, and the presence of large internal metallicity spreads within all three galaxies, these mean values are in good agreement with previous determinations (see, $e.g.$, Mateo 1998). The mean metallicity of the lone red giant in NGC 2419 is found to be \[Fe/H\] = $-2.32\pm0.11$ dex. This is slightly lower than, but still consistent with, the value of \[Fe/H\] = $-2.10\pm0.15$ dex found by Suntzeff, Kraft & Kinman (1988) from low-resolution spectroscopy of six red giants.
Light Elements
--------------
Many of the light elements such as O, Na, Mg, Al are known to exhibit significant star-to-star variations in globular clusters. For instance, Shetrone (1996), Kraft et al. (1997) and Sneden et al. (1997) find large ranges in the abundances of these light elements for red giants belonging to M3 and M92: $-0.7$ $<$ \[O/Fe\] $<$ +0.45 dex; $-0.3$ $<$ \[Na/Fe\] $<$ +0.5 dex; $-0.1$ $<$ \[Mg/Fe\] $<$ +0.4 dex; and 0.0 $>$ \[Al/Fe\] $>$ +1.1. By contrast, halo field stars do not exhibit these abundance variations. The observed variations in the globular cluster stars follow a specific pattern which is sometimes referred to as a “deep mixing abundance pattern”, with Al and Na being enhanced, and O (and sometimes Mg) being depleted. Any comparison of the dSph abundance patterns for these elements with those of the globular cluster stars is complicated by these variations. In Figure 3, the light element abundances for our program stars are shown along with a sample of Milky Way halo and disk stars. At least three of the M92 giants and one of the M3 giants exhibit the aforementioned “deep mixing abundance pattern”. Unfortunately, most of the O, Na and Al abundances for the dSph stars are upper limits, making a detailed comparison with the field star sample impossible.
Even-Z ($\alpha$) Elements
--------------------------
The light elements with even numbers of protons ($e.g.$, O, Mg, Si, Ca, Ti) are sometimes referred to as $\alpha$ elements, or even-Z elements. Figure 4 shows our measured abundances for these even-Z elements, except for O and Mg which are shown in Figure 3, plotted against the iron abundance. The abundances of the globular cluster stars — M3, M92 and NGC 2419 — are consistent with those of the halo field stars. The Galactic halo field stars exhibit $\alpha$-enhancements between 0.1 and 0.5 dex (with the exception of \[Si/Fe\] which shows a much broader distribution) over the metallicity range $-3.0 \lae$ \[Fe/H\] $\lae -1.2$ dex. Due to the large intrinsic spread among the Si abundances, and because of our rather large errors and upper limits on the measured Si abundances, the \[Si/Fe\] abundance pattern will be discussed no further. The bottom panel in Figure 4 gives [*average*]{} even-Z abundances, \[${\alpha}$/Fe\] = ${1 \over 3}$(\[Mg/Fe + Ca/Fe + Ti/Fe\]), for both our program stars and for those stars taken from the literature. This definition excludes the contribution from \[O/Fe\] since many of the stars (both in our sample and in the literature) do not have detected O lines.
A first impression from Figure 4 is that the stars belonging to the three different dSph galaxies occupy the same portion of the figures: $i.e.$, they have roughly the same abundance patterns. In addition, their abundance pattern appears to differ from that of the Galactic halo field star sample, with the dSph stars falling below the Milky Way sample at a given metallicity. Considering the dSph samples separately, the average even-Z abundances, \[$\alpha$/Fe\], are: 0.09$\pm$0.02 dex for Draco, 0.13$\pm$0.04 dex for Ursa Minor, and 0.02$\pm$0.07 dex for Sextans. Over the same range in metallicity, the halo field star sample has a mean value of \[$\alpha$/Fe\] = 0.28$\pm$0.02 dex. Thus, all three dSph samples have a statistically significant underabundance of Mg, Ca and Ti in comparison to the Galactic halo. By contrast, we find \[$\alpha$/Fe\] $\simeq$ 0.21$\pm$0.10 dex for the lone red giant in NGC 2419, which is slightly lower than, but nevertheless consistent with, the mean value of 0.34$\pm$0.04 dex for the red giants in M92.
There is also some evidence for a trend of decreasing \[$\alpha$/Fe\] abundance with increasing metallicity in the Sextans and Ursa Minor samples. The Ursa Minor sample is linearly correlated with a slope of d\[$\alpha$/Fe\]/d\[Fe/H\] = $-0.26\pm0.11$. The trend is less obvious among sample of Sextans stars, which have a slope of $-0.12\pm0.08$. Nonetheless, it is certainly true that the most metal-rich star in the Sextans sample has a significantly lower even-Z abundance than the rest of the Sextans sample. Similarly, the most metal-rich star in the Draco sample has the lowest \[O/Fe\] and \[Mg/Fe\] abundance ratios for this galaxy.
Iron Peak Elements
------------------
Figures 5 and 6 show the iron peak element abundance ratios plotted against metallicity. The \[V/Fe\] abundances are under-sampled due to the temperature sensitive nature of these lines: $i.e.$, the more metal-poor stars are hotter and hence the V lines are weaker due to both the lower abundances and the cooler temperatures. All of the dSph giants with measured V abundances exhibit the same abundance pattern as that of the halo field star sample, with the exception of Draco 473. This may be a further indication of chemical peculiarity of this metal-rich star, or it could indicate a problem with our adopted temperature.
Among the halo field stars more metal rich than ${\rm [Fe/H]}~\simeq -1.9$ dex, Co and Cr are found in their solar ratios; at lower metallicities, the abundances of Co and Cr diverge, with the \[Co/Fe\] ratios increasing and the \[Cr/Fe\] ratios decreasing. This same abundance pattern is seen in each of the three dSph samples. Like \[Cr/Fe\], the \[Cu/Fe\] and \[Mn/Fe\] abundances exhibit a decline with decreasing iron abundance, although the onset occurs at higher metallicity. All three dSph samples exhibit sub-solar \[Cu/Fe\] and \[Mn/Fe\] abundance ratios, consistent with that found in the Milky Way sample. In addition, both \[Ni/Fe\] and \[Zn/Fe\] are found in their solar ratios in the halo and dSph samples over the metallicity range of interest.
For NGC 2419, the measured \[Cr/Fe\], \[Mn/Fe\], \[Co/Fe\], \[Ni/Fe\] and \[Cu/Fe\] abundances are similar to those found for the red giants in M92.
Heavy Metals
------------
We define the heavy metals as those elements with ${\rm Z} > 30$. This broad definition includes many subcategories including the first s-process elements, the second s-process elements, and the r-process elements. The s-process elements are those produced mainly by slow neutron addition, while the r-process elements are created largely through the rapid addition of neutrons. Table 4 of Burris et al. (2000) gives the relative contributions of the s- and r-processes for for the all of the heavy elements in the sun. Of the heavy metals for which we have measured abundances, we have one first s-process peak element (Y), three second s-process peak elements (Ba, Ce, Sm), one r-process element (Eu) and one element which is nearly an even mix of the s- and r-processes (Nd). Figures 7 and 8 show the heavy metal abundances for the dSph, halo and globular cluster samples.
While the concept of s-process elements and r-process elements is a traditional one, it can lead to possible misconceptions. In most Population II stars, the r-process dominates and the s-process contributes little to the abundance of the “second s-process peak elements”. A notable exception to this trend is found among carbon stars. These asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars have contaminated atmospheres, with anomalously high fractions of carbon and s-process elements on their surfaces. As a result, their spectra are rich in C$_2$ bands and the lines of s-process elements. One star in our sample, Ursa Minor K, has a spectrum with strong C$_2$ bands, as noted previously from lower resolution spectroscopy (Canterna & Schommer 1978, Aaronson et al. 1983, Armandroff, Olszewski & Pryor 1995). Our analysis reveals an abundance pattern for this star which is dominated by the s-process, and confirms the classification of Ursa Minor K as a carbon star.
The abundance ratio \[Ba/Eu\] is most often used to access the relative contribution of the r- and s-processes to the heavy metal abundance pattern. Figure 8 shows the measured \[Ba/Eu\] ratios plotted against metallicity for our program stars. For the halo field star sample, the \[Ba/Eu\] abundances range from solar-like ratios in the most metal-rich stars, to \[Ba/Eu\] $\simeq -0.5$ for \[Fe/H\] $\lae -1$ dex. This trend can be understood as a evolution from old metal-poor stars having abundance patterns dominated by the r-process, to younger solar-metallicity stars with a mix of r-process and s-process patterns. Unfortunately, the spectrograph setup used during the observation of stars in Sextans did not include the lone Eu line which was included in the Draco and Ursa Minor spectra. For this reason, we do not have a \[Ba/Eu\] ratio for the Sextans stars, and hence no information about the relative r- and s-process contributions. However, the Draco and Ursa Minor stars (Ursa Minor K excluded) exhibit the same r-process dominated abundance pattern as does the Milky Way sample.
Inspection of Table 4 and Figures 7 and 8 reveals three stars whose heavy element abundance ratios are enhanced relative to those typical for other dSph and halo field stars: Ursa Minor K, Ursa Minor 199 and Sextans 35. As mentioned above, Ursa Minor K is an obvious carbon star with an enhanced s-process dominated abundance pattern, while the the heavy element abundance pattern for Ursa Minor 199 is dominated by the r-process. Unfortunately, we do not know what process dominates the heavy element abundance pattern for Sextans 35, since we lack a measured Eu abundance for this star. The enhancement of the heavy element abundances for these stars does have a precedent among halo field stars; a small percentage of Population II stars which show r-process dominated heavy element abundance patterns have large over abundances of the heavy elements with respect to iron ($e.g.$, Westin et al. 2000, Norris et al. 1997, Cowan et al. 1995)
Excluding the three dSph stars with large overabundances of the heavy elements, the abundances of the second s-process elements (Ce, Sm, and Ba) are consistent with those of the halo field stars. This is also true for the abundances of the r-process peak element Eu. However, the abundances of Y (a first s-process peak element) are much lower in the more metal-rich dSph giants than in the halo field stars of similar metallicity. In the bottom panel of Figure 8, we have plotted the \[Ba/Y\] abundance ratio against the metallicity. It is clear that the dSph sample has a significantly higher \[Ba/Y\] abundance ratio than the halo field star sample over the entire range of dSph metallicities.
For NGC 2419, the measured ratios of \[Ce/Fe\], \[Nd/Fe\], \[Y/Fe\] and \[Ba/Fe\] appear to be slightly enhanced over their respective ratios in the M92 giants. Interestingly, the inferred ratio of \[Ba/Y\] = $-0.13\pm0.14$ is in good agreement with the corresponding values measured for red giants in M92.
Discussion
==========
The abundance patterns of the three dSphs sampled here are remarkably uniform. This suggests that the galaxies share fairly similar nucleosynthetic histories, and thus, similar initial mass functions. Because dwarf galaxies (and DLA systems) have been invoked in numerous models for the formation of large galaxies, we now address the issue of how Sextans, Draco and Ursa Minor as a group fit into these scenarios.
Milky Way Comparison
--------------------
As mentioned above, there are some significant differences between the abundance patterns in the Milky Way and the dSph samples. Probably the most important of these is the lower even-Z abundances found among the dSph stars. Since the production of even-Z elements is thought to be dominated by massive Type II supernovae ($e.g.$, Tsujimoto, et al. 1995), lower \[$\alpha$/Fe\] abundance ratios would require either that the most massive Type II supernovae were absent in the young dSphs, or that the ejecta from these massive supernovae were lost from the galaxy and not incorporated in the subsequent generations of stars. Alternatively, it is possible that the chemical evolution of the dSph galaxies included a relatively large contribution from Type Ia supernovae (which are expected to produce large quantities of iron peak elements compared to the $\alpha$-elements).
The importance of the low \[$\alpha$/Fe\] abundance ratios should not be understated. The even-Z elements are abundant electron donors and hence important sources of atmospheric opacity in K giants; thus, the abundances of even-Z elements influence age estimates based upon isochrone fitting ($e.g.$, Bergbusch & VandenBerg 1992). As mentioned in §3, the analysis of halo stars includes the extra electron contribution to the opacities due to the even-Z elements, which is offset by artificially inflating the metallicity of the model atmosphere. We have followed this same procedure for the dSph stars; if this compensation were not included, the abundances of the neutral species would [*increase*]{} by 0.03 dex, while the abundance of the ionized species would [*decrease*]{} by 0.03 dex. Since our metallicities are based mainly upon the large number of Fe I lines, we may have underestimated the dSph abundances systematically by 0.03 dex. The abundance ratios for the neutral species should not change, but the abundance ratios reported in Table 4 for the ionized species may be systematically too large by 0.06 dex for stars which do not have enhanced abundances of even-Z elements.
Although the Galactic halo does contain stars with low even-Z abundance patterns ($e.g.$, Ivans et al. 2000), such stars are rare. The observed differences in the respective even-Z element abundance patterns may therefore put some interesting limitations on the suggestion that the Milky way was assembled from “building blocks”, or proto-Galactic fragments, similar to the dSphs sampled here ($e.g.$, Searle & Zinn 1978; Larson 1988; Zinn 1993; Mateo 1996; Côté et al. 2000). If these suggestions are correct, then perhaps the actual proto-Galactic fragments were larger and could better retain gas from massive Type II supernovae than the present sample of low-luminosity dSph galaxies. In the Monte-Carlo simulations of Côté et al. (2000), the initial population of proto-Galactic fragments span a wide range in luminosities, including a small number of large systems with present-day luminosities of $L_V \sim$ $2\times10^{8}$ $L_{V,{\odot}}$ as well as numerous small objects with luminosities similar to those of Draco, Sextans and Ursa Minor: $\langle L_V \rangle \sim 3\times10^{5}$ $L_{V,{\odot}}$. If the chemical enrichment of the proto-Galactic fragments can be roughly approximated by a Closed Box model ($e.g.$, Talbot & Arnett 1971; Searle & Sargent 1972), then those proto-Galactic fragments which are similar in luminosity to the Fornax dSph ($L_V = 1.5\times10^7$ $L_{V,{\odot}}$) galaxy are expected to have contributed roughly half of the number of halo field stars with \[Fe/H\] $\sim -2$ dex which originated in smaller fragments such as Draco, Sextans and Ursa Minor. Clearly, the measurement of even-Z abundances for stars belonging to the more massive Galactic satellites (such as Fornax, Sagittarius, and Leo I) are urgently needed to test these models.
Alternatively, it may be that the nucleosynthetic history of the proto-Galactic fragments was affected by the building process in such a way as to make them different than the dSph galaxies that survive today. Still another possibility is that the old, gas-poor dSph galaxies sampled here comprised only a small fraction of the actual proto-Galactic fragments, and that the dSph galaxies with younger populations ($i.e.$, those which had more gas for subsequent star formation) show even-Z abundance patterns which more closely resemble those of Galactic halo field stars. Again, element abundances for stars belonging to an expanded sample of dwarf galaxies are required to test these possibilities.
SBS reported that one of their giants, Draco 473, exhibits the deep mixing abundance pattern seen in many globular clusters, with Na enhanced and O and Mg depleted (see Kraft 1994 and Pinsonneault 1997 for recent reviews). With the expanded dSph sample presented here we now reinterpret the abundance pattern of Draco 473 as having its even-Z elements (including O and Mg) not enhanced in comparison to Milky Way halo field stars and probably not due to a deep mixing pattern as originally suggested.
Majewski et al. (2000) have proposed that $\omega$ Cen may be the nucleus of a dwarf galaxy which has been tidally stripped by the Milky Way. If true, a comparison of the abundances in this dwarf galaxy core to the abundances found in the low luminosity dwarf galaxies sampled here might reveal more clues to the formation of the halo. The dSph galaxies studied here exhibit heavy element abundance patterns which are quite different from those of RGB stars in $\omega$ Cen: Smith et al. (2000) find a large enhancement of s-process elements relative to r-process elements with increasing metallicity. They attribute this s-process domination to AGB nucleosynthesis enrichment by 1.5-3 $M_\odot$ stars. None of the dSph galaxies in our sample show evidence for such AGB nucleosynthesis enrichment. Thus, if $\omega$ Cen is indeed the remains of a disrupted dwarf galaxy, then it must have been one different from Draco, Sextans or Ursa Minor. Such a situation would not be entirely surprising given the relative luminosities of the dSph galaxies and $\omega$ Cen: $i.e.$, the latter has roughly the same luminosity as the three dSph galaxies [*combined*]{}. If $\omega$ Cen is truly the surviving nucleus a dwarf galaxy which has been tidally stripped by the Milky Way, then more massive systems such as Fornax or Sagittarius may be better analogs for the putative galaxy. Once again, high-resolution abundance analysis for stars belonging to the more massive Galactic satellites are needed to test this possibility.
As noted previously, two of the stars in our sample show large overabundances of the heavy elements with respect to iron and an r-process heavy element abundance pattern. Such stars are known in the Milky Way halo (see Westin et al. 2000; Norris et al. 1997; Cowan et al. 1995), but they are fairly rare. To find two such stars in our small sample suggests that these stars are much more common in dSph environments.
The underabundance of Y in our dSph sample is not easily understood, mainly because Y abundances in the Milky Way nucleosynthesis are themselves poorly understood. We offer two possible solutions and suggest that higher S/N spectra with wider wavelength coverage is required to further understand the first s-process peak. The \[Ba/Eu\] abundances in Figure 8 suggest that the dSph sample is r-process dominated, at least among the second s-process peak elements. If the first s-process peak were created in a separate site from the second s-process peak, then we might expect to find variations between the various nucleosynthetic sites. Wasserburg et al. (1996) suggest that different r-process sites might exist for low- and high-Z heavy elements, a hypothesis which has some observational support ($e.g.$, Sneden et al. 2000). In an attempt to explain the deep mixing abundance profile found in globular cluster stars, Cavallo & Nagar (2000) suggested that intermediate-mass AGB stars ($M > 4 M_\odot$) could produce $^{27}$Al from magnesium. These AGB stars will produce first s-process peak elements but no second s-process peak elements (Denissenkov et al. 1998; Boothroyd & Sackmann 1999). If either of the above processes contributes to the Galactic halo \[Y/Fe\] abundance pattern, but not to that of dSph stars (or did not contribute to the gas which made up subsequent generations of stars), then the two samples could show different \[Y/Fe\] ratios. In principal, the contribution of AGB stars could be tested carefully by searching for age spreads within these galaxies.
DLA Comparison
--------------
In addition to the samples of dSph and halo stars, Figures 3-8 show element abundances for a sample of DLA systems with low dust contents. Given the complexities of deriving the intrinsic ($i.e.$, undepleted) element abundances in such systems (see, $e.g.$, Vladilo 1998), we show only the observed abundances in these systems, all of which show relatively low levels of dust depletion. For the elements Si, Cr, Mn, and Ni there is agreement among the abundances of the dSph, Milky Way and DLA samples. As is well known, the Zn abundances of the DLA systems are systematically larger than those of the sample of Galactic halo and disk stars; the measured Zn abundances for the dSph stars are smaller still, at least for the more metal-rich dSph stars. The Zn overabundance in DLA systems has sometimes been attributed to depletion of Fe by dust grains ($e.g.$, Pettini et al. 1994; 1999; Kulkarni et al. 1997), although others contend that the usual Zn abundances of the DLA systems may be intrinsic to their stellar nucleosynthesis (Lu et al. 1996).
Obviously, grain depletion is not an issue for our measured dSph abundances. We find significantly different \[Zn/Fe\] ratios than in the Galactic halo, suggesting that the mechanism responsible for the production of the Zn in these galaxies was either missing, or was somehow kept from contributing to the enrichment of subsequent generations of stars. The former possibility would suggest that old, low-mass dSph galaxies such as Draco, Ursa Minor and Sextans are not the surviving end-products of high-redshift DLA systems. Alternatively, the latter possibility would indicate that the Zn-rich gas present in these galaxies would have to be removed during a quiescent star formation period, or expelled by an energetic source.
Unfortunately, little is known about the nucleosynthetic site of Zn. Classified as an iron peak element, it is largely ignored in analyses of neutron capture processes. An exception is Burris et al. (2000), who report a solar system r-process fraction of 0.66 for Zn. In light of suggestions that different r-process sites might exist for low- and high-Z heavy elements, a more extensive study of Zn in relation to the first s-process peak elements might provide some useful insights.
Summary
=======
High-resolution spectra for red giant stars belonging to the Draco, Sextans and Ursa Minor dSph galaxies, and the distant Galactic globular cluster NGC 2419, have been obtained with HIRES on the Keck I telescope. Using these spectra, we have measured element abundances ratios for more than 20 elements. This is the first investigation of the abundance patterns of stars belonging to Sextans, Ursa Minor and NGC 2419, and constitutes a factor of four increase the number of dSph stars having abundances measured from high-resolution spectra.
From a single red giant in NGC 2419, we find a metallicity of \[Fe/H\] = $-2.32\pm0.11$ dex, which is slightly lower than, but in acceptable agreement with, previous estimates from low-resolution spectroscopy (Suntzeff, Kraft & Kinman 1988). With the possible exception of slight enhancements in a number of heavy elements, the measured abundances ratios closely resemble those of red giant stars in M92: a nearby, well-studied globular cluster of similar metallicity.
We find a remarkably uniform abundance pattern for our sample of 17 dSph stars. This suggests that the three dSph galaxies have fairly similar nucleosynthetic histories and, presumably, similar initial mass functions. All three galaxies show unmistakable evidence for a large range in metallicity: ${\Delta}$\[Fe/H\] = 1.53, 0.73 and 1.40 dex for Draco, Ursa Minor and Sextans, respectively. We find that the dSph stars have \[$\alpha$/Fe\] abundances which are $\simeq$ 0.2 dex [*lower*]{} than those of halo field stars in the same metallicity range: $i.e$., \[$\alpha$/Fe\] $\simeq$ 0.1 dex, compared to \[$\alpha$/Fe\] $\simeq$ 0.3 dex for halo stars. The measured \[Eu/Fe\] and \[Ba/Fe\] abundances for the dSph stars suggest that the chemical evolution in the dSph environments has been dominated by the r-process. In addition, the dSph stars show significantly larger \[Ba/Y\] abundance ratios than do halo field stars over the full range in metallicity. These observations provide some evidence against the notion that the Galactic halo has been assembled [*entirely*]{} through the disruption of very low-luminosity dSph galaxies like the three galaxies studied here. A more detailed assessment of role played by the disruption of dwarf galaxies in the formation of the Galactic halo must await the measurement of element abundances for stars belonging to an expanded sample of Galactic satellites, particularly more luminous systems such as Sagittarius, Fornax and Leo I.
A comparison of the measured abundance ratios for the dSph stars with those reported for DLA systems having low levels of dust depletion reveals \[Zn/Fe\] abundance ratios which are nearly an order of magnitude lower than those in the high-redshift absorbers, indicating that old, gas-poor dSph galaxies like those studied here are probably not the low-redshift analogs of the DLA systems.
This work was based on observations obtained at the W.M. Keck Observatory, which is operated jointly by the California Institute of Technology and the University of California. We are grateful to the W.M. Keck Foundation for their vision and generosity. We thank Tom Barlow for helpful advice on the use of MAKEE. We thank Jon Fulbright, Andy McWilliam, John Cowan and Jim Truran for their insightful discussions. Thanks also to Peter Stetson, Kyle Cudworth and Nick Suntzeff for providing photometry for the dwarf galaxies in electronic form. PC acknowledges support provided by the Sherman M. Fairchild Foundation. WLWS was supported by grant AST 99-00733 from the National Science Foundation.
[crccrl]{} 1 & 13-15/03/1999 & C5 & 1$\times$2 & 34,000 & Sextans, NGC 2419, M3, M92 2 & 15-16/07/1999 & C5 & 1$\times$2 & 34,000 & Ursa Minor, M3, M923 & 14/08/1999 & C5 & 1$\times$2 & 34,000 & Draco
[lrrcrrcr]{} III-13 & 12.03 & 1.31 &0.02& 360 & 105 & 1253.10461 & -111.8$\pm$0.7 & & & & 240 & 93 & 1374.75736 & -114.1$\pm$0.3 VII-18 & 12.19 & 1.28 &0.02& 300 & 101 & 1375.75659 & -117.7$\pm$0.2 V-106 & 12.47 & 1.12 &0.02& 300 & 81 & 1375.74965 & -124.0$\pm$0.6 III-65 & 12.49 & 1.17 &0.02& 360 & 83 & 1253.11160 & -119.7$\pm$0.6 & & & & 300 & 88 & 1374.76362 & -119.0$\pm$0.3 III-28 & 12.81 & 1.36 &0.01& 240 & 65 & 1253.16298 & -152.8$\pm$0.2 I-21 & 13.05 & 1.36 &0.01& 300 & 65 & 1374.74650 & -145.6$\pm$0.3 IV-101 & 13.26 & 1.29 &0.01& 480 & 77 & 1375.73520 & -144.8$\pm$0.3 RH10 & 17.61 & 1.17 &0.06& 3600 & 20 & 1250.77596 & -18.1$\pm$0.4 11 & 17.60 & 1.12 &0.03& 3600 & 24 & 1404.82121 & -283.1$\pm$0.7 343 & 17.62 & 1.12 &0.03& 3600 & 24 & 1404.86929 & -293.1$\pm$0.8 177 & 16.90 & 1.29 &0.03& 3600 & 36 & 1374.79308 & -234.5$\pm$0.3 297 & 16.91 & 1.57 &0.03& 3600 & 36 & 1374.88445 & -235.9$\pm$0.3 K & 16.98 & 1.35 &0.03& 3600 & 34 & 1375.82789 & -246.1$\pm$0.6 O & 17.03 & 1.31 &0.03& 3600 & 34 & 1375.87494 & -250.5$\pm$1.1 199 & 17.15 & 1.38 &0.03& 3600 & 33 & 1374.83949 & -249.2$\pm$0.3 168 & 17.88 & 0.95 &0.03& 3600 & 19 & 1375.78264 & -232.9$\pm$0.5 S35 & 17.30 & 1.41 &0.05& 3600 & 27 & 1250.92386 & 218.2$\pm$0.3 S56 & 17.37 & 1.43 &0.05& 3600 & 26 & 1250.82948 & 226.9$\pm$0.4 S49 & 17.59 & 1.15 &0.05& 3600 & 17 & 1250.87628 & 230.9$\pm$0.6 S58 & 17.69 & 1.17 &0.05& 3600 & 21 & 1251.77326 & 219.8$\pm$0.4 S36 & 17.96 & 1.10 &0.05& 3600 & 13 & 1252.77161 & 222.9$\pm$0.5
[crrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr]{} 5006.12 & 2.83 & -0.628 & 135& 144& 135& 130& 183& 131& 136& 167& 121& 149& 155& 92& 167& 117 5083.35 & 0.96 & -2.862 & 169& 162& 150& 150& 223& & 160& & 120& 180& 179& 98& 155& 170 5150.85 & 0.99 & -3.030 & 143& 152& 137& 150& 215& & 137& & 116& 169& 154& 99& 178& 145 5171.61 & 1.48 & -1.751 & 163& 165& 168& 178& & 149& 177& & 144& & & 131& & 160 5216.28 & 1.61 & -2.102 & 133& 144& 142& 144& & 136& 154& & 96& 158& 145& 106& 142& 5217.30 & 3.21 & -1.270 & 74& 95& 82& 82& 125& 69& 82& 112& 47& 95& 87& & 92& 39 5232.95 & 2.94 & -0.067 & 145& 170& 156& 167& 228& 138& 146& & 120& & 170& 102& 160& 158 5250.21 & 0.12 & -4.700 & 119& 117& 122& 133& & 100& 136& & & 159& 162& & 141& 93 5253.02 & 2.28 & -3.810 & & & & & 55& & 18& 46& & & 25& & 30& 5307.37 & 1.61 & -2.812 & 100& 107& 100& 118& 162& 73& 106& 138& 68& 113& 141& 50& 130& 85 5324.19 & 3.21 & -0.100 & 118& 147& 124& 136& & 115& 132& & 85& 135& 151& 80& 168& 122 5501.48 & 0.96 & -3.050 & 160& 149& 153& 166& & 165& 169& & 100& & & 101& & 136 5506.79 & 0.99 & -2.790 & 163& & 134& 180& & 150& 178& & 140& & & 132& & 148 5956.70 & 0.86 & -4.570 & 75& 87& 67& 82& 159& 46& 87& 134& 31& 100& 114& 23& 129& 67 5976.79 & 3.94 & -1.290 & & 41& 31& 28& 57& & & 46& & & & & & 6027.06 & 4.07 & -1.180 & & 32& & 30& 53& & & 68& & 18& & & & 6056.01 & 4.73 & -0.450 & & 29& & & 50& & 20& 40& 16& & & & & 6078.50 & 4.79 & -0.370 & & & & 21& 46& & 19& 40& & & & & & 6079.01 & 4.65 & -0.950 & & & & & & & & 25& & & & & & 6082.72 & 2.22 & -3.590 & & & & 25& 86& & 33& 73& & & & & & 6120.26 & 0.91 & -5.940 & & & & & 40& & & 33& & & & & & 6136.62 & 2.45 & -1.500 & 133& 140& 133& 141& 220& 118& 141& & 87& 149& 156& 64& 158& 148 6137.70 & 2.59 & -1.366 & 132& 125& 106& 123& 211& 113& 134& & 81& 147& 157& 54& 148& 142 6151.62 & 2.18 & -3.370 & & 46& 34& 39& 106& 19& 50& 83& 17& 60& 67& & 83& 6157.73 & 4.07 & -1.260 & & 38& & 24& 73& & 27& & & 34& & & 37& 6165.36 & 4.14 & -1.470 & & & & & 24& & & 34& & & & & & 6173.34 & 2.22 & -2.850 & 50& 82& 55& 72& 130& 46& 73& 115& 30& 83& 80& & 97& 47 6187.99 & 3.94 & -1.580 & & & & & 38& & & 48& & & & & & 6213.43 & 2.22 & -2.660 & 72& & & 100& & & 98& 123& & 119& 104& & 130& 89 6229.23 & 2.84 & -2.900 & & 20& 21& 17& 46& & & 51& & 29& 34& & 35& 6230.74 & 2.56 & -1.276 & 138& 163& 144& 148& 227& 138& 155& & 105& 167& 165& 87& 148& 124 6240.66 & 2.22 & -3.230 & & 50& 24& 47& 107& & 40& 77& & 69& 65& & 59& 6252.57 & 2.40 & -1.757 & 137& 121& 122& 135& 172& 108& 139& 167& 99& 144& 155& 62& 138& 125 6290.97 & 4.73 & -0.760 & & & & & 32& & & & & & & & & 6297.80 & 2.22 & -2.740 & & 66& 87& 105& 143& & 90& 120& 57& & & & & 6353.84 & 0.91 & -6.430 & & & & & 11& & & 11& & & & & & 6355.04 & 2.84 & -2.290 & & 62& 48& 51& 123& & 58& 94& & & & & & 6380.75 & 4.19 & -1.500 & & & & & 54& & & 42& & & & & & 6392.54 & 2.28 & -3.950 & & & 16& & 50& & & 38& & & & & & 6393.61 & 2.43 & -1.630 & & 147& 131& 129& & 155& 138& 179& 82& & & & & 6498.94 & 0.96 & -4.690 & & 86& 62& 64& 158& 48& 80& 113& & & & & & 6518.37 & 2.83 & -2.460 & & 56& 47& 44& 89& 25& 38& 81& & & & & & 6574.23 & 0.99 & -5.020 & & 50& 49& 53& 114& 39& 48& 94& & & & & & 6581.22 & 1.48 & -4.680 & & & 33& 21& 77& & 21& 59& & & & & & 6593.88 & 2.43 & -2.390 & & 82& 80& 87& 143& 80& 92& 138& & & & & & 6608.03 & 2.28 & -3.940 & & & & & 40& & & 26& & & & & & 6609.12 & 2.56 & -2.660 & & 59& 44& 43& 119& 44& 69& 106& & & & & & 5234.63 & 3.22 & -2.118 & 66& 87& 84& 87& 75& 88& 85& 95& 65& 89& 88& 75& 121& 70 5264.81 & 3.23 & -3.210 & & 37& 31& 23& 40& & 33& 48& & 30& 33& & 45& 27 6149.25 & 3.89 & -2.720 & & 30& 25& 22& 17& 23& 31& 39& & 29& 20& & 40& 6369.46 & 2.89 & -4.250 & & & 17& & & & & 29& & & & & & 6456.39 & 3.90 & -2.080 & & 52& 49& 46& 58& 53& 50& 71& 28& & & & & 6516.08 & 2.89 & -3.450 & & 58& 44& 43& 44& 44& 55& 59& & & & & & 6363.79 & 0.02 & -10.250 & &$<$10& 14&$<$10& 17&$<$10&$<$10&$<$10&$<$10& & & & & 5682.65 & 2.10 & -0.700 &$<$19&$<$15&$<$18&$<$15& 73&$<$18&$<$15&$<$12&$<$20&$<$15& $<$8&$<$22&$<$20&$<$19 5688.21 & 2.10 & -0.370 &$<$33&$<$20&$<$20& 15& 88&$<$20&$<$15& 27&$<$30& 25& 25&$<$20&$<$30&$<$20 6154.23 & 2.10 & -1.560 & & & & &$<$13& & & & & & & & & 6160.75 & 2.10 & -1.260 & & & & & 29& & & & & & & & & 4703.00 & 4.33 & -0.520 & 99& 123& 120& 119& 177& 124& 129& 128& 102& 118& 108& 88& 94& 5172.70 & 2.71 & -0.390 & 290& 298& 293& 298& 457& 280& 330& 368& 259& 310& 349& 235& 315& 264 5183.27 & 2.70 & -0.170 & 386& 372& 327& 376& 660& 400& 400& 505& 305& 453& 438& 228& 362& 280 6696.03 & 3.14 & -1.570 & &$<$20&$<$10&$<$10&$<$10&$<$10&$<$14&$<$10&$<$10& & & & & 5645.66 & 4.91 & -2.140 & & & & &$<$15& & & & & & & & & 5665.60 & 4.90 & -2.040 &$<$10& &$<$20& &$<$13&$<$25&$<$15&$<$15&$<$18&$<$15& &$<$20&$<$20&$<$22 5684.52 & 4.93 & -1.650 &$<$19&$<$15&$<$16& 16& 34& 23& 20&$<$12&$<$15& 17&$<$16&$<$20&$<$30&$<$27 5772.26 & 5.06 & -1.750 &$<$15&$<$15&$<$20&$<$12&$<$15&$<$18&$<$20&$<$12&$<$20& &$<$20&$<$20&$<$20&$<$30 6145.02 & 5.61 & -1.370 & & &$<$15& 16&$<$12&$<$12& & 12& & & & &$<$15& 6243.82 & 5.61 & -1.270 & &$<$12&$<$12& & & & &$<$12& &$<$15&$<$12& &$<$18& 6244.48 & 5.61 & -1.270 & &$<$15& &$<$12& 18& &$<$18& 15&$<$20& 12&$<$15&$<$20&$<$20&$<$22 6122.23 & 1.89 & -0.320 & 124& 138& 120& 138& 188& 121& 139& 165& 107& 149& 142& 58& 143& 130 6161.30 & 2.52 & -1.270 & & 29& & 22& 53& & 22& 64& & 26& & & 35& 30 6166.44 & 2.52 & -1.140 & & 42& & 22& 63& & & 45& & 28& 40& & & 30 6169.04 & 2.52 & -0.800 & 27& 63& 39& 42& 85& 45& 40& 64& & 45& 45& & 43& 28 6169.56 & 2.52 & -0.480 & 36& 75& 47& 65& 95& 52& 55& 81& 21& 63& 72& & 72& 50 6455.60 & 2.52 & -1.290 & & 22& & 17& 58& & 15& 45& & & & & & 6499.65 & 2.52 & -0.820 & & 44& 42& 48& 88& 58& 47& 60& & & & & & 4548.76 & 0.83 & -0.290 & 50& & & 69& & & 94& 106& & 98& 104& & & 44 4555.49 & 0.85 & -0.430 & 60& & & 63& 113& 62& 64& 85& 44& 67& 98& & 61& 4623.10 & 1.74 & 0.166 & 31& 48& & 25& 75& & 39& 50& & & & & & 4645.19 & 1.74 & -0.501 & 5& & & & 58& & & & & & 35& & & 4656.47 & 0.00 & -1.280 & 103& 83& 85& 87& & 51& 76& 128& 45& 120& 107& & 89& 40 4840.87 & 0.90 & -0.450 & 76& 54& 39& 73& 140& 34& 61& 87& 33& 82& 93& & 74& 4913.62 & 1.87 & 0.216 & & 35& & 19& 71& & & 31& & & 42& & 29& 4997.10 & 0.00 & -2.060 & 46& & & 64& 151& & 69& 86& & 52& 58& & 47& 60 5014.24 & 0.81 & 0.910 & 196& 167& 139& 162& 273& 135& 178& 220& 100& 200& 188& 60& 138& 113 5016.16 & 0.85 & -0.510 & 54& 74& 53& 80& 130& 44& 77& 109& 36& 76& 89& & 62& 47 5064.65 & 0.05 & -0.930 & 114& 133& 96& 113& 210& 94& 124& & 67& 131& 128& 31& 111& 110 5113.44 & 1.44 & -0.727 & & & & 18& 62& & & 25& & & & & & 5145.47 & 1.46 & -0.518 & & & & 29& 64& & & 38& & & & & & 5210.39 & 0.05 & -0.580 & 112& 118& 118& 136& 221& 115& 148& 164& 75& 136& 176& 30& 133& 84 5978.54 & 1.87 & -0.440 & & & & 14& 34& & 26& 30& & & & & & 4583.41 & 1.16 & -2.870 & & 55& & 43& 73& 35& 70& 78& & 48& 42& & 40& 4636.32 & 1.16 & -3.230 & & 48& 52& 51& 58& & 35& & & 25& & & 45& 4657.20 & 1.24 & -2.320 & 53& 108& 75& & 97& 67& 83& 84& 50& 75& 79& & 39& 4708.66 & 1.24 & -2.370 & 78& 77& 65& 73& 85& & 80& 87& & 76& 88& & 62& 4719.52 & 1.24 & -3.280 & & 20& 37& 30& 40& & 18& 50& & & & & & 4798.53 & 1.08 & -2.670 & & 77& 73& 85& 103& & 87& 101& & 82& & & & 38 5154.07 & 1.57 & -1.520 & 90& 96& 82& 104& 95& 100& 100& 132& 60& 105& 102& 40& 95& 75 5226.55 & 1.57 & -1.000 & 105& 115& 91& 119& 152& 117& 125& 135& 105& 120& 125& 74& 117& 100 5381.01 & 1.57 & -1.780 & 79& 80& 72& 84& 135& 76& 84& 120& 45& 123& 90& 45& 81& 65 5418.77 & 1.58 & -2.110 & 74& 87& 57& 70& 88& 65& 86& 69& 47& 69& 52& 19& 63& 46 6216.37 & 0.28 & -1.270 & & & 18& & 86& & 18& 35& & 24& 26& & & 6224.51 & 0.29 & -1.820 & & & & & 29& & & 23& & & & & & 6233.20 & 0.28 & -2.000 & & & & & & & & & & & 11& & & 6274.66 & 0.27 & -1.690 & & & & & 57& & & & & & & & & 6285.16 & 0.28 & -1.560 & & & & & 75& & & & & & & & & 6292.82 & 0.29 & -1.520 & & & & & & & 25& 39& & & & & & 5409.80 & 1.03 & -0.720 & 111& 136& 100& 125& 221& 119& 124& 177& 59& 139& 148& 40& 138& 100 5407.42 & 2.14 & -1.743 & & & & 16& 52& & & 48& & & & & 25&$<$20 5420.36 & 2.14 & -1.460 & 13&$<$18& & 23& 89&$<$20& 30& 66&$<$20& 35& 31& & & 5432.55 & 0.00 & -3.795 & 30& 45& 38& 34& 165& 26& 51& & 21& 75& 50&$<$20& 55&$<$20 5516.77 & 2.18 & -1.847 & & & & & 50& & & 23& & & & & & 6013.51 & 3.07 & -0.252 &$<$12&$<$15& 16& 14& 54&$<$25&$<$25& 51&$<$23& 20&$<$18&$<$20& 37&$<$20 6021.82 & 3.08 & 0.035 & 42& 46&$<$18& 31& 93& 30& 49& 64&$<$24& 35& 40&$<$27& 53&$<$25 5483.34 & 1.71 & -1.488 &$<$23& 33& 25& 54& 130&$<$23& 34& 61&$<$18& 39& 49&$<$30& 22&$<$23 5647.23 & 2.28 & -1.560 & & & &$<$15& 18& & & 15& & & & & & 6454.99 & 3.63 & -0.250 & & & & & 19& & & & & & & & & 5476.92 & 1.83 & -0.890 & 142& 138& 137& 148& 205& 134& 148& 200& 110& 164& 158& 116& 147& 123 6176.82 & 4.09 & -0.430 & & & & 20& 25& & & 22& & & & & & 6177.25 & 1.83 & -3.500 & & 20& & & & & & 15& & & & & & 5782.13 & 1.64 & -1.781 &$<$14&$<$30&$<$20&$<$20& 56&$<$18&$<$18&$<$30&$<$20&$<$18&$<$20&$<$40&$<$30&$<$40 4722.16 & 4.03 & -0.390 & 48& 45& 45& 41& 60& & 67& 63& 25& 36& 26& & & 4810.54 & 4.08 & -0.170 & 12& 41& 23& 36& 38& 38& 59& 44& 37& 32& 44&$<$29& 42& 35 4883.69 & 1.08 & 0.070 & 77& 62& 47& 61& 108& 90& 52& 130& 34& 76& 65&$<$20& 61& 65 4900.11 & 1.03 & -0.090 & 82& 50& 70& 54& & 81& 60& 128& 50& 90& 74& & 70& 100 5087.43 & 1.08 & -0.170 & 55& 37& & 43& 98& 76& 38& 114& 31& & & & & 5200.42 & 0.99 & -0.570 & 40& 39& 40& 43& 90& 52& 38& 110& 29& 74& 46&$<$23& 27& 69 5853.69 & 0.60 & -1.010 & 82& 99& 79& 82& 142& 180& 77& 177& 62& 165& 127& 20& 120& 100 6141.73 & 0.70 & -0.077 & 128& 150& 150& 144& 207& 269& 135& 249& 142& 204& 172& 52& 165& 175 6496.91 & 0.60 & -0.380 & & 163& 163& 143& 212& 265& 133& 251& 115& & & & & 4562.37 & 0.48 & 0.500 & 35& 50& 29& 30& 73& 104& 15& 134& 23& 102& 44&$<$40& 40&$<$65 4628.16 & 0.52 & 0.390 & 38& 55& 25& 30& 60& 122& 15& 121& 22& 105& 50&$<$50& 40&$<$65 5249.59 & 0.98 & 0.217 & 19& 43& 16& 27& 78& 87& 20& 110& 23& 71& 56&$<$30& 45& 44 5319.82 & 0.55 & -0.194 & 37& 55& 30& 34& 90& 111& 34& 133& 19& 101& 48&$<$25& 45& 42 4642.23 & 0.38 & -0.520 &$<$35& 33& 20& 35& 91& 90& 30& 121&$<$20& 95& 59&$<$25& 50&$<$65 6645.13 & 1.37 & 0.200 & & 27&$<$20& 15& 49& 50& 15& 107& 36& & & & &
[lcccrrrrrrrr]{} III-13 & 4175 & 0.20 & 2.10 & -2.28$\pm$0.11 & 0.13$\pm$0.15 & 0.48$\pm$0.10 & 0.64$\pm$0.16 & 0.90$\pm$0.15 & 0.47$\pm$0.15 & 0.30$\pm$0.08 & 0.39$\pm$0.07 VII-18 & 4225 & 0.00 & 2.15 & -2.27$\pm$0.11 & $<$0.15 & 0.38$\pm$0.15 & 0.37$\pm$0.15 & 1.25$\pm$0.15 & 0.75$\pm$0.18 & 0.29$\pm$0.08 & 0.32$\pm$0.07 V-106 & 4375 & 0.70 & 2.00 & -2.33$\pm$0.11 & $<$0.36 &-0.21$\pm$0.15 & 0.48$\pm$0.15 & $<$0.90 & 0.47$\pm$0.15 & 0.26$\pm$0.08 & 0.24$\pm$0.07 III-65 & 4325 & 0.50 & 2.10 & -2.30$\pm$0.11 & 0.23$\pm$0.15 & 0.31$\pm$0.14 & 0.38$\pm$0.18 & 1.01$\pm$0.18 & 0.62$\pm$0.20 & 0.27$\pm$0.07 & 0.15$\pm$0.06 III-28 & 4175 & 0.70 & 1.90 & -1.70$\pm$0.11 & 0.37$\pm$0.14 &-0.23$\pm$0.09 & 0.41$\pm$0.15 &-0.06$\pm$0.20 & 0.31$\pm$0.12 & 0.28$\pm$0.08 & 0.37$\pm$0.07 I-21 & 4200 & 0.70 & 1.70 & -1.44$\pm$0.11 & 0.21$\pm$0.14 &-0.26$\pm$0.09 & 0.30$\pm$0.15 & 0.24$\pm$0.14 & 0.15$\pm$0.14 & 0.27$\pm$0.07 & 0.32$\pm$0.06 IV-101 & 4225 & 0.80 & 1.70 & -1.44$\pm$0.11 & 0.02$\pm$0.14 & 0.20$\pm$0.09 & 0.24$\pm$0.13 & 0.85$\pm$0.12 & 0.09$\pm$0.15 & 0.28$\pm$0.08 & 0.32$\pm$0.07 RH10 & 4275 & 0.70 & 2.10 & -2.32$\pm$0.11 & & $<$0.26 & 0.30$\pm$0.18 & & $<$0.72 & 0.11$\pm$0.12 & 0.22$\pm$0.11 11 & 4475 & 0.80 & 1.80 & -1.72$\pm$0.11 & $<$0.38 &$<$-0.34 & 0.07$\pm$0.15 & $<$0.71 & $<$0.30 & 0.16$\pm$0.08 & 0.09$\pm$0.07 343 & 4475 & 0.90 & 1.80 & -1.86$\pm$0.11 & 0.42$\pm$0.22 &-0.15$\pm$0.00 & 0.06$\pm$0.20 & $<$0.34 & $<$0.50 & 0.03$\pm$0.11 &-0.03$\pm$0.11 473 & 4400 & 0.90 & 1.75 & -1.44$\pm$0.07 &-0.32$\pm$0.18 &-0.04$\pm$0.09 &-0.19$\pm$0.17 & & $<$0.14 & 0.18$\pm$0.08 &-0.18$\pm$0.25 267 & 4180 & 0.60 & 1.95 & -1.67$\pm$0.13 & 0.21$\pm$0.11 &-0.59$\pm$0.17 &-0.04$\pm$0.21 & & $<$0.29 & 0.19$\pm$0.08 & 0.02$\pm$0.31 24 & 4290 & 0.80 & 2.00 & -2.36$\pm$0.09 & 0.38$\pm$0.18 &-0.33$\pm$0.18 & 0.26$\pm$0.16 & & & 0.07$\pm$0.06 &-0.04$\pm$0.18 119 & 4370 & 0.15 & 2.80 & -2.97$\pm$0.15 & &-0.09$\pm$0.17 & 0.20$\pm$0.17 & & & 0.11$\pm$0.07 &-0.17$\pm$0.31 177 & 4300 & 0.40 & 1.90 & -2.01$\pm$0.11 & $<$0.33 &-0.37$\pm$0.18 & 0.32$\pm$0.17 & $<$0.68 & 0.51$\pm$0.30 & 0.18$\pm$0.08 & 0.15$\pm$0.08 297 & 4075 & 0.40 & 2.30 & -1.68$\pm$0.11 & 0.18$\pm$0.22 & 0.15$\pm$0.12 & 0.24$\pm$0.22 & $<$0.21 & 0.30$\pm$0.20 & 0.02$\pm$0.08 & 0.12$\pm$0.07 K & 4325 & 0.10 & 2.00 & -2.17$\pm$0.12 & $<$0.38 & $<$0.20 & 0.69$\pm$0.25 & $<$0.90 & $<$0.88 & 0.43$\pm$0.11 & 0.04$\pm$0.10 O & 4325 & 0.30 & 1.80 & -1.91$\pm$0.11 & $<$0.22 &$<$-0.24 & 0.43$\pm$0.20 & $<$0.51 & 0.32$\pm$0.30 & 0.09$\pm$0.08 & 0.20$\pm$0.07 199 & 4325 & 0.30 & 1.95 & -1.45$\pm$0.11 &$<$-0.05 &$<$-0.66 & 0.02$\pm$0.17 & $<$0.01 & 0.00$\pm$0.20 &-0.01$\pm$0.09 &-0.08$\pm$0.09 168 & 4625 & 1.30 & 1.70 & -2.18$\pm$0.12 & & $<$0.30 & 0.23$\pm$0.17 & & $<$0.89 & 0.11$\pm$0.30 & 0.01$\pm$0.14 S35 & 4225 & 0.10 & 2.00 & -1.93$\pm$0.11 & &-0.24$\pm$0.18 & 0.27$\pm$0.19 & & 0.45$\pm$0.30 & 0.11$\pm$0.10 & 0.07$\pm$0.10 S56 & 4175 & 0.30 & 1.90 & -1.93$\pm$0.11 & &-0.27$\pm$0.18 & 0.23$\pm$0.19 & & $<$0.45 & 0.08$\pm$0.10 & 0.13$\pm$0.10 S49 & 4325 & 0.10 & 2.50 & -2.85$\pm$0.13 & & & 0.41$\pm$0.20 & & & 0.08$\pm$0.23 &-0.29$\pm$0.15 S58 & 4525 & 1.00 & 1.90 & -1.45$\pm$0.12 & &$<$-0.43 &-0.46$\pm$0.19 & & $<$0.30 &-0.12$\pm$0.10 &-0.35$\pm$0.10 S36 & 4425 & 1.10 & 2.10 & -2.19$\pm$0.12 & & $<$0.15 &-0.07$\pm$0.20 & & & 0.34$\pm$0.11 &-0.10$\pm$0.11
[lrrrrrrrrr]{} III-13 & -2.28$\pm$0.11 & 0.04$\pm$0.10 &-0.15$\pm$0.12 &-0.27$\pm$0.08 & 0.18$\pm$0.10 & 0.04$\pm$0.12 &-0.64$\pm$0.15 & 0.17$\pm$0.14 & 0.33$\pm$0.16 VII-18 & -2.27$\pm$0.11 &-0.02$\pm$0.12 &-0.10$\pm$0.12 &-0.37$\pm$0.09 & 0.08$\pm$0.10 & 0.02$\pm$0.12 &-0.65$\pm$0.15 & 0.30$\pm$0.16 & 0.18$\pm$0.16 V-106 & -2.33$\pm$0.11 & 0.43$\pm$0.20 &-0.23$\pm$0.14 &-0.28$\pm$0.14 & 0.05$\pm$0.11 & 0.13$\pm$0.13 &-0.76$\pm$0.15 & 0.14$\pm$0.12 & 0.28$\pm$0.18 III-65 & -2.30$\pm$0.11 & 0.17$\pm$0.10 &-0.27$\pm$0.11 &-0.42$\pm$0.14 & 0.15$\pm$0.15 & 0.10$\pm$0.12 &-0.78$\pm$0.15 & 0.07$\pm$0.12 & 0.42$\pm$0.19 III-28 & -1.70$\pm$0.11 & 0.12$\pm$0.09 &-0.01$\pm$0.13 &-0.26$\pm$0.08 &-0.04$\pm$0.20 & 0.11$\pm$0.13 &-0.37$\pm$0.13 & 0.09$\pm$0.14 & -0.03$\pm$0.24 I-21 & -1.44$\pm$0.11 & 0.08$\pm$0.09 & 0.08$\pm$0.12 &-0.14$\pm$0.10 &-0.08$\pm$0.16 &-0.04$\pm$0.12 &-0.17$\pm$0.13 &-0.02$\pm$0.15 & -0.16$\pm$0.20 IV-101 & -1.44$\pm$0.11 & 0.08$\pm$0.09 & 0.12$\pm$0.13 &-0.19$\pm$0.10 & 0.07$\pm$0.14 &-0.07$\pm$0.16 &-0.28$\pm$0.13 & 0.05$\pm$0.10 & -0.05$\pm$0.19 RH10 & -2.32$\pm$0.11 & &-0.32$\pm$0.17 &-0.31$\pm$0.12 & $<$0.00 & 0.00$\pm$0.19 &$<$-0.43 & $<$0.15 & 11 & -1.72$\pm$0.11 & &-0.01$\pm$0.17 &-0.50$\pm$0.10 &-0.19$\pm$0.18 & 0.00$\pm$0.15 &$<$-0.35 &-0.21$\pm$0.15 & -0.18$\pm$0.25 343 & -1.86$\pm$0.11 &-0.02$\pm$0.18 &-0.49$\pm$0.18 &-0.56$\pm$0.10 &-0.20$\pm$0.18 &-0.06$\pm$0.21 &$<$-0.43 &-0.28$\pm$0.30 & 0.29$\pm$0.25 473 & -1.44$\pm$0.07 &-0.68$\pm$0.18 &-0.05$\pm$0.12 &-0.32$\pm$0.15 & 0.12$\pm$0.14 & 0.19$\pm$0.13 &$<$-0.10 & 0.12$\pm$0.20 & 0.17$\pm$0.18 267 & -1.67$\pm$0.13 &-0.20$\pm$0.18 &-0.05$\pm$0.13 &-0.28$\pm$0.16 & $<$0.05 & 0.36$\pm$0.14 &$<$-0.39 &$<$-0.46 & 24 & -2.36$\pm$0.09 & & 0.04$\pm$0.11 & $<$0.05 &-0.07$\pm$0.20 & 0.31$\pm$0.16 &$<$-0.15 & 0.10$\pm$0.20 & -0.11$\pm$0.23 119 & -2.97$\pm$0.15 & &-0.54$\pm$0.08 & $<$0.80 & $<$1.27 &-0.42$\pm$0.11 & $<$0.92 & $<$1.06 & 177 & -2.01$\pm$0.11 & &-0.23$\pm$0.17 &-0.37$\pm$0.10 & 0.26$\pm$0.13 & 0.08$\pm$0.17 &$<$-0.50 &-0.01$\pm$0.15 & 0.49$\pm$0.21 297 & -1.68$\pm$0.11 &-0.13$\pm$0.10 & 0.14$\pm$0.18 &-0.35$\pm$0.10 & 0.06$\pm$0.20 &-0.12$\pm$0.15 &$<$-0.52 &-0.20$\pm$0.30 & -0.08$\pm$0.27 K & -2.17$\pm$0.12 & &-0.01$\pm$0.22 &-0.32$\pm$0.18 & $<$0.10 &-0.02$\pm$0.22 &$<$-0.26 & 0.06$\pm$0.20 & O & -1.91$\pm$0.11 &-0.01$\pm$0.21 &-0.26$\pm$0.17 &-0.33$\pm$0.12 &-0.15$\pm$0.18 & 0.00$\pm$0.17 &$<$-0.61 & 0.50$\pm$0.20 & 0.11$\pm$0.25 199 & -1.45$\pm$0.11 &-0.17$\pm$0.11 & 0.07$\pm$0.16 &-0.36$\pm$0.08 &-0.27$\pm$0.15 &-0.18$\pm$0.25 &$<$-0.80 &-0.26$\pm$0.25 & -0.34$\pm$0.22 168 & -2.18$\pm$0.12 & &-0.64$\pm$0.23 &$<$-0.10 & $<$0.17 & 0.03$\pm$0.22 & $<$0.10 & 0.03$\pm$0.15 & S35 & -1.93$\pm$0.11 &-0.26$\pm$0.18 &-0.27$\pm$0.20 &-0.46$\pm$0.10 &-0.20$\pm$0.20 & 0.01$\pm$0.20 &$<$-0.74 &-0.15$\pm$0.30 & 0.07$\pm$0.28 S56 & -1.93$\pm$0.11 &-0.22$\pm$0.15 &-0.18$\pm$0.19 &-0.66$\pm$0.12 &-0.14$\pm$0.20 &-0.08$\pm$0.19 &$<$-0.78 &-0.10$\pm$0.20 & 0.04$\pm$0.28 S49 & -2.85$\pm$0.13 & &-0.46$\pm$0.23 & & & 0.26$\pm$0.23 & & $<$0.47 & S58 & -1.45$\pm$0.12 & &-0.29$\pm$0.24 &-0.49$\pm$0.10 &-0.64$\pm$0.30 &-0.33$\pm$0.24 &$<$-0.58 &-0.56$\pm$0.30 & -0.35$\pm$0.38 S36 & -2.19$\pm$0.12 & &-0.38$\pm$0.23 &$<$-0.14 & $<$0.10 &-0.24$\pm$0.23 & $<$0.10 &-0.02$\pm$0.25 &
[lrrrrrrrrr]{} III-13 & -2.28$\pm$0.11 &-0.25$\pm$0.07 &-0.50$\pm$0.07 &-0.57$\pm$0.10 &-0.37$\pm$0.10 & 0.08$\pm$0.14 &-0.04$\pm$0.14 &-0.46$\pm$0.16 &-0.25$\pm$0.10 VII-18 & -2.27$\pm$0.11 &-0.35$\pm$0.07 &-0.50$\pm$0.07 &-0.51$\pm$0.10 &-0.28$\pm$0.10 & 0.02$\pm$0.14 &-0.03$\pm$0.14 &-0.47$\pm$0.16 &-0.15$\pm$0.10 V-106 & -2.33$\pm$0.11 &-0.33$\pm$0.07 &-0.40$\pm$0.07 &-0.50$\pm$0.10 &-0.14$\pm$0.10 & 0.12$\pm$0.14 & 0.27$\pm$0.14 &-0.67$\pm$0.16 &-0.07$\pm$0.10 III-65 & -2.30$\pm$0.11 &-0.41$\pm$0.07 &-0.43$\pm$0.07 &-0.47$\pm$0.10 &-0.16$\pm$0.10 & 0.27$\pm$0.14 & 0.16$\pm$0.14 &-0.59$\pm$0.16 &-0.02$\pm$0.10 III-28 & -1.70$\pm$0.11 & 0.08$\pm$0.07 & 0.08$\pm$0.07 &-0.15$\pm$0.10 & 0.28$\pm$0.10 & 0.63$\pm$0.14 & 0.48$\pm$0.14 &-0.40$\pm$0.16 & 0.00$\pm$0.10 I-21 & -1.44$\pm$0.11 &-0.16$\pm$0.07 & 0.05$\pm$0.07 &-0.19$\pm$0.10 & 0.17$\pm$0.10 & 0.29$\pm$0.14 & 0.38$\pm$0.14 &-0.33$\pm$0.16 & 0.21$\pm$0.10 IV-101 & -1.44$\pm$0.11 &-0.08$\pm$0.07 & 0.14$\pm$0.07 & 0.06$\pm$0.10 & 0.29$\pm$0.10 & 0.47$\pm$0.14 & 0.40$\pm$0.14 &-0.26$\pm$0.16 & 0.22$\pm$0.10 RH10 & -2.32$\pm$0.11 & 0.03$\pm$0.10 &-0.15$\pm$0.10 &-0.05$\pm$0.14 & 0.19$\pm$0.14 & $<$0.80 & & &-0.18$\pm$0.14 11 & -1.72$\pm$0.11 &-0.68$\pm$0.10 & 0.11$\pm$0.10 &-0.13$\pm$0.14 & 0.23$\pm$0.14 & 0.36$\pm$0.20 & 0.55$\pm$0.20 &-0.44$\pm$0.22 & 0.79$\pm$0.14 343 & -1.86$\pm$0.11 &-0.45$\pm$0.10 & 0.09$\pm$0.10 &-0.53$\pm$0.14 &-0.19$\pm$0.14 & 0.18$\pm$0.20 & 0.51$\pm$0.20 &-0.42$\pm$0.22 & 0.54$\pm$0.14 473 & -1.44$\pm$0.07 &-0.74$\pm$0.16 &-0.01$\pm$0.16 & 0.03$\pm$0.35 & 0.50$\pm$0.35 & & & & 0.73$\pm$0.23 267 & -1.67$\pm$0.13 &-0.73$\pm$0.16 & 0.41$\pm$0.16 & 0.19$\pm$0.35 & 0.11$\pm$0.18 & & & & 1.14$\pm$0.23 24 & -2.36$\pm$0.09 &$<$-0.65 &-1.19$\pm$0.25 &$<$0.00 &$<$-0.04 & & & & 119 & -2.97$\pm$0.15 &$<$-0.39 &$<$-1.17 &$<$0.41 & $<$0.37 & & & & 177 & -2.01$\pm$0.11 &-0.52$\pm$0.10 &-0.22$\pm$0.10 &-0.51$\pm$0.14 &-0.09$\pm$0.14 & 0.48$\pm$0.20 & 0.26$\pm$0.20 &-0.48$\pm$0.22 & 0.30$\pm$0.14 297 & -1.68$\pm$0.11 &-0.04$\pm$0.09 & 0.15$\pm$0.09 &-0.23$\pm$0.11 & 0.45$\pm$0.11 & 1.06$\pm$0.18 & 0.74$\pm$0.18 &-0.59$\pm$0.20 & 0.19$\pm$0.13 K & -2.17$\pm$0.12 & 0.06$\pm$0.09 & 1.37$\pm$0.09 & 1.36$\pm$0.11 & 1.28$\pm$0.11 & 1.73$\pm$0.18 & 1.04$\pm$0.18 & 0.33$\pm$0.20 & 1.31$\pm$0.13 O & -1.91$\pm$0.11 &-0.67$\pm$0.10 &-0.39$\pm$0.10 &-1.02$\pm$0.14 &-0.27$\pm$0.14 & 0.28$\pm$0.20 & 0.15$\pm$0.20 &-0.54$\pm$0.22 & 0.28$\pm$0.14 199 & -1.45$\pm$0.11 & 0.34$\pm$0.09 & 0.77$\pm$0.09 & 1.03$\pm$0.11 & 1.13$\pm$0.11 & 1.75$\pm$0.18 & 1.49$\pm$0.18 &-0.72$\pm$0.20 & 0.43$\pm$0.13 168 & -2.18$\pm$0.12 &-0.34$\pm$0.10 & 0.18$\pm$0.09 &-0.18$\pm$0.14 & 0.23$\pm$0.14 & $<$0.65 & $<$1.30 & & 0.52$\pm$0.13 S35 & -1.93$\pm$0.11 &-0.07$\pm$0.10 & 0.70$\pm$0.10 & 0.89$\pm$0.11 & 0.79$\pm$0.11 & 1.58$\pm$0.18 & & & 0.77$\pm$0.14 S56 & -1.93$\pm$0.11 &-0.37$\pm$0.13 & 0.23$\pm$0.14 &-0.25$\pm$0.14 & 0.22$\pm$0.14 & 0.86$\pm$0.20 & & & 0.60$\pm$0.19 S49 & -2.85$\pm$0.13 &$<$-0.35 &-1.05$\pm$0.15 & $<$0.45 & $<$0.50 & $<$0.94 & & & S58 & -1.45$\pm$0.12 &-0.77$\pm$0.13 & 0.11$\pm$0.14 &-0.54$\pm$0.14 & 0.00$\pm$0.14 & 0.52$\pm$0.20 & & & 0.88$\pm$0.19 S36 & -2.19$\pm$0.12 & 0.25$\pm$0.13 & 0.39$\pm$0.14 & $<$0.46 & 0.52$\pm$0.14 & $<$1.34 & & & 0.14$\pm$0.19
Aaronson, M., Hodge, P. W., & Olszewski, E. W. 1983, , 267, 271 Armandroff, T.E., Olszewski, E.W., & Pryor, C. 1995, , 110, 2131 Armosky, B.J., Sneden, C., Langer, G.E., & Kraft, R.P. 1994, , 108, 1364 Baade, W., & Swope, H. 1961, , 84, 1149 Bergbusch, P.A., & VandenBerg, D.A. 1992, , 81, 163 Bizzarri, A., Huber, M.C.E., Noels, A., Grevess, N., Bergeson, S.D., Tsekeris, P., & Lawler, J.E. 1993, , 273, 707 Blackwell, D.E., Petford, A.D., Shallis, M.J., & Leggett, S. 1982, , 199, 21 Blackwell, D.E., Booth, A. J., Menon, S.L.R., & Petford, A.D. 1986, , 220, 289 Blitz, L., & Robishaw, T. 2000, ApJ, in press (astro-ph/0001142) Boothroyd, A.I., & Sackmann, I.J. 1999, , 510, 232 Briley, M.M., Smith, V.V., Suntzeff, N.B., Lambert, D.L., Bell, R.A., & Hesser, J.E. 1995, Nature, 383, 604 Burris, D.L., Pilachowski, C.A., Armandroff, T.E., Sneden, C., Cowan, J.J., & Roe, H. 2000, , submitted (astro-ph/0005188) Canterna, R. 1975, , 200, 63 Canterna, R., & Schommer, R. A. 1978, , 219, 119 Carretta, E., & Gratton, R. G. 1997, , 121, 95 Cathey, L. 1974, , 79, 1370 Cavallo, R.M., Sweigart, A.V., & Bell, R.A. 1996, , 464, L79 Cavallo, R.M., & Nagar, N.M. 2000, , in press (astro-ph/0002511) Côté, P., Oke, J.B., & Cohen, J.G. 1999, , 118, 1645 Côté, P., Marzke, R.O., West, M.J., & Minniti, D. 2000, , 533, 869 Cowan, J.J., Burris, D.L., Sneden, C., McWilliam, A., & Preston, G.W. 1995, , 439, 51 Da Costa, G.S., Hatzidimitriou, D., Irwin, M.J., & McMahon, R.G. 1991, , 249, 473 Da Costa, G.S., Armandroff, T.E., Caldwell, N., & Seitzer, P. 2000, , 119, 705 Denissenkov, P.A., Da Costa, G.S., Norris, J.E., & Weiss, A. , 333, 926 Edvardsson, B., Andersen, J., Gustafsson, B., Lambert, D.L., Nissen, P.E., & Tomkin, J. 1993, , 275, 101 (E93) Fuhrmann, K., Axer, M., & Gehren, T. 1995, , 301, 492 Gallagher, J.S., & Wyse, R.F.G. 1994 , 106, 1225 Gratton, R.G. 1989, , 208, 171 (GS) Gratton, R.G., & Sneden, C. 1988, , 204, 193 (GS) Gratton, R.G., & Sneden, C. 1991, , 241, 501 (GS) Gratton, R.G., & Sneden, C. 1994, , 287, 927 (GS) Grebel, E.K. 1999, in The Stellar Content of Local Group Galaxies, IAU Symposium 192, eds P. Whitelock & R. Cannon, (San Francisco, ASP), p. 17 Grillmair, C.J., et al. 1998, , 115, 144 Gustafsson, B., Bell, R.A., Ericksson, K., & Norlund, A. 1975, A&A, 42, 407 Haehnelt, M.G., Steinmetz, M., & Rauch, M. 1998, , 495, 647 Haehnelt, M.G., Steinmetz, M., & Rauch, M. 2000, , 534, 594 Hernandez, X., Gilmore, G., & Valls-Gabaud, D. 2000, , in press (astro-ph/0001337) Hilker, M., & Richtler, T. 2000, in Proc. Liege Int. Astrophys. Coll., The Galactic Halo: From Globular Clusters to Field Stars, ed. A. Noels et al., in press (astro-ph/9910370) Hodge, P.W. 1971, , 9, 35 Hughes, J., & Wallerstein, G. 2000, , 119, 1225 Ibata, R.A., Gilmore, G., & Irwin, M.J. 1994, , 370, 194 Ivans, I.I., Carney, B., de Almeida, L., & Sneden, C. 2000, in Dynamics of Star Clusters and the Milky Way, ASP Conf. Ser., in press Johnson, H., & Sandage, A. 1956, , 124, 379 Kraft, R.P. Sneden, C., Langer, G.E., & Prosser, C.F. 1992, , 104, 645 Kraft, R.P. Sneden, C., Langer, G.E., & Shetrone, M.D. 1993, , 106, 1490 Kraft, R.P. 1994, , 106, 553 Kraft, R.P. Sneden, C., Langer, G.E., Shetrone, M.D., & Bolte, M. 1995, , 109, 2586 Kraft, R. P., Sneden, C., Smith, G.H., Shetrone, M.D., Langer, G.E., & Pilachowski, C. A. 1996, , 113, 279 Kraft, R. P., Sneden, C., Smith, G. H., Shetrone, M. D., Langer, G. E., & Pilachowski, C. A. 1997, , 113, 279 Klypin, A.A., Kravtsov, A.V., Valenzuela, O., & Prada, F. 1999, ApJ, 522, 82 Kulkarni, V. P., Fall, S. M., & Truran, J. W. 1997, , 484, 7 Larson, R.B. 1988, in Globular Cluster Systems in Galaxies, IAU Symposium 126, edited by G. Grindlay and A. Philip (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 311 Langer, G.E., Hoffman, R.D., & Zaidins, C.S. 1997, , 109, 244 Larson, R.B. 1988, in Globular Cluster Systems in Galaxies, IAU Symposium 126, edited by G. Grindlay and A. Philip (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 311 Lehnert, M.D., Bell, R.A., Hesser, J.E., & Oke, J.B. 1992, 395, 466 Lu, L., Sargent, W. L. W., Barlow, T. A., Churchill, C. W., & Vogt, S. S. 1996, , 107, 475 Majewski, S. R., Patterson, R. J., Dinescu, D. I., Johnson, W. Y., Ostheimer, J. C., Kunkel, W. E., & Palma, C. 2000, in Proc. Liege Int. Astrophys. Coll., The Galactic Halo: From Globular Clusters to Field Stars, ed. A. Noels et al., in press (astro-ph/9910278) Mateo, M., Fiscehr, P., & Krzeminski, W. 1995, , 110, 2166 Mateo, M. 1996, in Formation of the Galactic Halo... Inside and Out, ASP Conference Series, Vol. 92, edited by H. Morrison and A. Sarajedini (San Francisco: ASP), 434 Mateo, M. 1998, , 36, 435 McWilliam, A., Preston, G.W., Sneden, C., & Searle, L. 1995, , 109, 2757 (M95) McWilliam, A., & Rich, M. 1994, , 91, 749 McWilliam, A. , 35, 503 Moore, B., Ghinga, S., Governato, F., Lake, G., Quinn, T., Stadel, J., & Tozzi, P. 1999, , 524, 19 Nissen, P.E., & Schuster, W.J. 1997, , 326, 751 (NS) Norris, J.E., Ryan, S.G., & Beers, T.C. 1997, , 489, 169 Olszewski, E.W., Aaronson, M., & Hill, J.M. 1995, , 110, 2120 Pancino, E., Ferraro, F.R., Bellazzini, M., Piotto, G., & Zoccali, M. 2000, , 534, 83 Pettini, M., Smith, L.J., Hunstead, R.W., & King, D. L. 1994, , 426, 79 Pettini, M., Smith, L.J., King, D.L., & Hunstead, R.W. 1997, , 486, 665 Pettini, M., Boksenberg, A., & Hunstead, R.W. 1990, , 348, 48 Pettini, M., Ellison, S.L., Steidel, C.C., & Bowen, D.V. 1999, , 510, 576 Pettini, M., Ellison, S.L., Steidel, C.C., Shapley, A.E., & Bowen, D.V. 2000, , 532, 65 (P00) Pilachowski, C. A., Sneden, C., & Kraft, R. P. 1996, , 111, 1689 Pinsonneault, M. 1997, , 35, 557 Prochaska, J.X., & Wolfe, A.M. 1997, , 487, 73 Racine, R., & Harris, W.E. 1975, , 196, 413 Sandage, A. 1953, , 58, 61 Sandage, A. 1970, , 162, 841 Sandage, A., & Walker, M. 1966, , 143, 313 Schlegel, D.J., Finkbeiner, D.P., & Davis, M. 1998, , 500, 525 Searle, L., & Sargent, W.L.W. 1972, , 173, 25 Searle, L., & Zinn, R. 1978, , 225, 357 Shetrone, M.D. 1994, , 106, 161 Shetrone, M.D. 1996, , 112, 1517 Shetrone, M.D., Bolte, M., & Stetson, P.B. 1998, , 115, 1888 (SBS) Smith, V.V., Suntzeff, N.B., Cunha, K., Gallino, R., Busso, M., Lambert, D.L., & Straniero, O. 2000, , 119, 1239 Sneden, C. 1973, , 184, 839 Sneden, C., Gratton, R.G., & Crocker, D.A. 1991, , 246, 354 (GS) Sneden, C., Kraft, R.P., Prosser, C.F., & Langer, G.E. 1991, , 102, 2001 Sneden, C., McWilliam, A., Preston, G.W., Cowan, J.J., Burris, D.L., & Armosky, B.J., 1996, , 467, 819 Sneden, C., Kraft, R.P., Shetrone, M.D., Smith, G.H., Langer, G.E., & Prosser, C.F. 1997, , 114, 1964 Sneden, C., Cowan, J.J., Ivans, I.I., Fuller, G.M., Burles, S., Beers, T.C., & Lawler, J.E. 2000, , 533, 139 Stephens, A. 1999, , 117, 1771 (S99) Stetson, P.B. 1979, , 84, 1149 Stetson, P.B. 1984, , 96, 128 Suntzeff, N.B., Kraft, R.P., & Kinman, T.D. 1988, , 95, 91 Suntzeff, N.B., & Smith, V.V. 1991, , 381, 160 Suntzeff, N.B., Mateo, M., Terndrup, D.M., Olszewski, E.W., Geisler, D., & Weller, W. 1993, , 418, 208 Talbot, R.J., & Arnett, W.D. 1971, , 170, 409 Tsujimoto, T., Nomoto, K., Yoshii, Y., Hashimoto, M., Yanagida, S., & Thielemann, F.-K. 1995, , 277, 945 Tyson, N.D. 1988, , 329, L57 Unavane, M., Wyse, R.F.G., & Gilmore, G. 1996, , 278, 727 van Agt, S.L.Th.J. 1967, Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherlands, 19, 275 Vladilo, G. 1998, , 493, 583 (V98) Wasserburg, G.J., Busso, M., & Gallino, R. 1996, , 466, 109 Vogt, S.S., et al. 1994, SPIE, 2198, 362 Westin, J., Sneden, C., Gustafsson, B., & Cowan, J. J. 2000, , 530, 783 Wolfe, A.M., Lanzetta, K.M., Foltz, C.B., & Chaffee, F.H. 1995, , 454, 698 Yanny, B., et al. 2000, , in press (astro-ph/0004128) York, D.G., Dopita, M., Green, R., & Bechtold, J. 1986, , 311, 610 Zinn, R. 1978, , 225, 790 Zinn, R. 1993, in The Globular Cluster-Galaxy Connection, ASP Conference Series, Vol. 48, edited by G. Smith and J. Brodie (San Francisco: ASP), 603
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'High-dimensional autoregressive point processes model how current events trigger or inhibit future events, such as activity by one member of a social network can affect the future activity of his or her neighbors. While past work has focused on estimating the underlying network structure based solely on the times at which events occur on each node of the network, this paper examines the more nuanced problem of estimating [*context-dependent*]{} networks that reflect how features associated with an event (such as the content of a social media post) modulate the strength of influences among nodes. Specifically, we leverage ideas from compositional time series and regularization methods in machine learning to conduct network estimation for high-dimensional *marked* point processes. Two models and corresponding estimators are considered in detail: an autoregressive multinomial model suited to categorical marks and a logistic-normal model suited to marks with mixed membership in different categories. Importantly, the logistic-normal model leads to a convex negative log-likelihood objective and captures dependence across categories. We provide theoretical guarantees for both estimators, which we validate by simulations and a synthetic data-generating model. We further validate our methods through two real data examples and demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches.'
author:
- 'Lili Zheng$^1$, Garvesh Raskutti$^1$, Rebecca Willett$^{2}$, Benjamin Mark$^3$'
bibliography:
- 'reference.bib'
title: |
Context-dependent self-exciting point processes:\
models, methods, and risk bounds in high dimensions
---
Introduction
============
High-dimensional self-exciting point processes arise in a broad range of applications. For instance, in a social network, we may observe a time series of members’ activities, such as posts on social media where each person’s post can influence their neighbors’ future posts ([*e.g.,* ]{} [@stomakhin2011reconstruction; @romero2011influence]). In the broadcast of social events, news media sources play a key role and influential news media sources often trigger others to post new articles . In electrical systems, cascading chains of power failures reveal critical information about the underlying power distribution network [@rudin2011machine; @ertekin2015reactive]. During epidemics, networks among computers or people are reflected by the time at which each node becomes infected [@ganesh2005effect; @yang2013epidemics]. In biological neural networks, firing neurons can trigger or inhibit the firing of their neighbors, so that information about the network structure is embedded within spike train observations [@linderman2016bayesian; @fletcher2014scalable; @hall2015online; @pillow2008spatio; @gerhard2017stability]. The above processes are [*self-exciting*]{} in that the likelihood of future events depends on past events ([*i.e.,* ]{}a particular type of autoregressive process).
In many applications, events are associated with feature vectors describing the events. For instance, interactions in a social network have accompanying text, images, or videos; and power failures are accompanied by information about current-carrying cables, cable ages, and cable types. This feature vector associated with an event is referred to as a [*mark*]{} in the point process literature. Prior works [@hall2016inference; @mark2018network] describe methods and theoretical guarantees for network influence estimation given multivariate event data without accounting for the type or context of the event. The contribution of this paper focuses on [*estimation methods and theoretical guarantees for context-dependent network structures*]{} which exploit marks. The key idea is that different categories of events are characterized by different (albeit related) functional networks; we think of the feature vector as revealing the [*context*]{} of each event, and our task is to infer context-specific functional networks. Allowing for marks provides a much richer model class that can reflect, for instance, that people interact in a social network differently when interactions are family-focused vs. work-focused vs. political [@puniyani2010social; @feller2011divided; @williams2013system]. Learning richer models like these allows our methods to have much stronger predictive capabilities, and to provide more insights in the network structure.
However, developing a statistical model for marked self-exciting point processes is a non-trivial task. One particular challenge is that we usually cannot determine the exact category of the event. For example, a post on social media may exhibit membership in several topics [@blei2003latent]; an infected patient’s symptoms can be caused by different diseases [@woodbury1978mathematical]; a new product released to the market could contain several features or styles. Some natural-seeming models lead to computationally-intractable estimators, while others fail to account for ambiguity in the marks. In this paper we propose two models that suit distinct scenarios:
(i) [**Multinomial Model:**]{} This model is applied when each event ([*i.e.,* ]{}its mark) naturally belongs to a single category. For example, a tweet may clearly belong to a single category ([*e.g.,* ]{}“political”).
(ii) [**Logistic-normal Model:**]{} This model is applied when each event is a mixture of multiple categories ([*i.e.,* ]{}mixed membership). For example, a news article may belong to two or more categories ([*e.g.,* ]{}“political” and “finance”) and we may only have measurements of the relative extent to which it’s in each category.
To the best of our knowledge, the multinomial model we consider appeared first in [@tank2017granger], while no theoretical guarantee was provided. From both a modeling and theoretical perspective, the logistic-normal model is more nuanced. It employs the logistic-normal distribution widely used in compositional data analysis ([*e.g.,* ]{}@aitchison1982statistical [@brunsdon1998time; @ravishanker2001compositional]). The logistic-normal model has advantages over other mixed membership models such as the Dirichlet distribution and the more recent Gumbel soft-max distribution since it leads to a convex negative log-likelihood function and models dependence among sub-compositions of the membership vector, which will be explained in detail in the beginning of Section \[sec:set\_up\_LN\_cts\].
#### High-dimensional setting:
Throughout this paper we focus on the *high-dimensional* setting, where the number of nodes in the network is large and grows with sample size. We assume the number of edges within the huge network to be *sparse*: each node should only be influenced by a limited number of other nodes. We state this condition more formally in Section \[sec:theory\].
Contributions
-------------
Our contributions are summarized as follows:
- For both models, we present estimation algorithms based on minimizing a convex loss function using a negative log-likelihood loss plus a regularization term that accounts for the sparsity of networks but shared network structure between models corresponding to different categories.
- Furthermore, we establish risk bounds that characterize the error decay rate as a function of network size, sparsity, shared structure, and number of observations, and these bounds are illustrated with a variety of simulation studies.
- Finally, we validate the hypothesis that the logistic-normal is more suitable for mixed membership settings while the multinomial model is more suitable for settings with a clear dominant category through experimental results on real data from two datasets and a synthetic data-generating model. The synthetic data model is based on a noisy logistic-normal distribution with some nodes having events with a single dominant category and other nodes following a mixed membership setting. The multinomial model tends to correctly detect the edges between nodes with a single dominant category while the logistic-normal approach tends to correctly detect the edges corresponding to nodes with mixed membership categories. We further validate the hypothesis with two datasets: (1) a political tweets data set focusing on the network which varies according to political leanings of tweets and (2) online media data set where the network depends on topics of memes. The networks detected for both datasets tend to support the above hypothesis.
Related Work {#sec:related_work}
------------
There has been substantial literature on recovering network structure using time series of event data in recent years, including continuous-time approaches [@zhou2013learning; @yang2017online] based on Hawkes process [@hawkes1971spectra] and discrete-time approaches [@linderman2016bayesian; @fletcher2014scalable; @hall2016inference; @mark2018network]. Our work follows the line of works (discrete time approaches): [@hall2016inference; @mark2018network], but with the additional challenge of incorporating the context information of events. [@tank2017granger] considers the multinomial model with exact categorical information of events but provides no theoretical guarantees.
Another popular approach aiming to recover the text-dependent network structure in social media is the cascade analysis [@lerman2010information; @yu2017topicbased; @yu2018learning], which focuses on the diffusion of information, [*e.g.,* ]{}retweeting or sharing the same hyperlink. However, it is also possible for users to interact in social media by posting about similar topics ([*e.g.,* ]{}showing condolence for shooting events) or arguing about opposite opinions ([*e.g.,* ]{}tweets sent by presidential candidates) without sharing exactly the same text. This kind of interaction is captured by our approach but not by the cascade analysis. Due to the nature of our models, we can also study time series of event data with any categorical marks (either exact or with uncertainty/mixed membership), without diffusion of information involved. Examples include the stock price changes with corresponding business news as side information. We can also analyze multi-node compositional time series ([@brunsdon1998time; @ravishanker2001compositional] are existing works on single-node compositional time series) if we consider a special case of the logistic-normal model and with $q=1$. Our work also incorporates proof techniques from the high-dimensional statistics literature ([*e.g.,* ]{}[@bickel2009simultaneous; @raskutti2010restricted]), whilst incorporating the nuances of temporal dependence, non-linearity and context-based information not captured in prior works.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: we elaborate on our problem formulations and corresponding estimators in Section \[sec:model\_est\]; theoretical guarantees on estimation errors are provided in Section \[sec:theory\]; we also present simulation results on synthetic data and our synthetic model example in Section \[sec:numeric\_exp\] and real data experiments in Section \[sec:real\_data\], respectively.
Problem Formulation and Estimators {#sec:model_est}
==================================
We begin by introducing basic notation. For any two tensors $A$ and $B$ of the same dimension, let $\langle A, B\rangle$ denote the Euclidean inner product of $A$ and $B$. Also, define the Frobenius norm of tensor $A$ as $\|A\|_{F}=\langle A, A\rangle^{\frac{1}{2}}.$
For any $4$th-order tensor $A\in {\mathbb{R}}^{n_1\times n_2\times n_3\times n_4}$, define the regularization norm $\|\cdot\|_{R}$ as $$\label{eq:nmR}
\|A\|_{R}=\sum_{m,m'}\|A_{m,:,m',:}\|_{F}.$$ For any matrix $A$, we let $\lambda_{\min}(A)$ denote the smallest eigenvalue of $A$. Let ${{{{\mathbbm{1}}}}_{\{E\}}} = {\footnotesize \begin{cases}1,& \text{if } E \text{ true} \\ 0,& \text{else}\end{cases}}$ be the indicator function.
$M$ refers to the number of nodes (multiple time series) and let $X^t\in \mathbb{R}^{M\times K}$ be the observed data during time period $t$ for $t = 0,1,...,T$, where $K$ is the number of categories of events. For each $1\leq m\leq M$, $0\leq t\leq T$, if there is no event, $X^t_m\in \mathbb{R}^K$ is a zero vector. For times and nodes with events, we consider two different observation models. The first model is the multinomial model (Sec. \[sec:set\_up\_mult\]) corresponding to the setting in which each event only belongs to a single category. In this case, if the event at time $t$ and node $m$ is in category $k \in \{1,\ldots,K\}$, then we let $X^t_m=e_k$, where $e_k$ is the $k$-th vector in the canonical basis of $\mathbb{R}^K$. The second is the logistic-normal model (Sec. \[sec:setup\_mixed\]) corresponding to the setting in which each event has mixed category membership and that membership is potentially observed with noise. In this case, we let $X^t_m$ be a vector on the simplex $\triangle^{K-1}$, with non-negative elements summing up to one. The following two sections address these two cases separately.
Multinomial Model {#sec:set_up_mult}
-----------------
When each event belongs to a single category, the distribution of $\{X^{t+1}_m\}_{m=1}^M$ conditioned on the past data $X^t$ can be modeled as independent multinomial random vectors. Specifically, let tensor $A^{{\mathrm{MN}}}\in \mathbb{R}^{M\times K\times M\times K}$ encode the context-dependent network, and each entry $A^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_{mkm'k'}$ is the influence exerted upon {node $m$, category $k$} by {node $m'$, category $k'$}. We will refer to this influence as [*absolute*]{} influence, contrasted with the relative influence and overall influence in the logistic-normal model introduced later. That is, an event from node $m'$ in category $k'$ may increase or decrease the likelihood of a future event by node $m$ in category $k$, and $A^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_{mkm'k'}$ parameterizes that change in likelihood. We can also think of this network as a collection of $K\times K$ subnetworks indexed by $\{A^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_{:,k,:,k'}\in {\mathbb{R}}^{M\times M},1\leq k,k'\leq K\}$, where each sub-network is the influence among the $M$ nodes, for a pair of categories $(k, k')$. Further define $\nu^{{\mathrm{MN}}}\in \mathbb{R}^{M\times K}$ as the intercept term where each entry $\nu^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_{mk}$ determines the event rate of {node $m$, category $k$} when there are no past stimuli. The overall event rate is parameterized by the [*intensity*]{}. Then the intensity of {node $m$, category $k$} at time $t+1$ given the past is $$\mu^{t+1}_{mk}=\langle A^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_{mk},X^t\rangle+\nu^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_{mk}=\sum_{m',k'} A^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_{mkm'k'} X^t_{m'k'}+\nu^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_{mk},$$ and the conditional distribution of $X^{t+1}_m$ is $$\begin{aligned}
\begin{split}
\mathbb{P}(X_m^{t+1}=e_k|X^t)=&\frac{e^{\mu^{t+1}_{mk}}}{1+\sum_{k'=1}^Ke^{\mu^{t+1}_{mk'}}},\, 1\leq k\leq K \\
\mathbb{P}(X_m^{t+1}=0|X^t)=&\frac{1}{1+\sum_{k'=1}^Ke^{\mu^{t+1}_{mk'}}}.
\label{eq:mult}
\end{split}\end{aligned}$$ This is also the multinomial logistic transition distribution (mLTD) model considered in @tank2017granger.
To estimate the parameter $A^{{\mathrm{MN}}}\in \mathbb{R}^{M\times K\times M\times K}$, one straightforward method is to find the minimizer of the penalized negative log-likelihood: $$\label{eq:est_mult}
\widehat{A}^{{\mathrm{MN}}}={\mathop{\rm arg\min}}_{A\in \mathbb{R}^{M\times K\times M\times K}} L^{{\mathrm{MN}}}(A)+\lambda\|A\|_{R},$$ where $$\begin{aligned}
\begin{split}
L^{{\mathrm{MN}}}(A)
=\frac{1}{T}\sum_{t=0}^{T-1} \sum_{m=1}^M\Big[f&(\langle A_m, X^{t}\rangle+\nu^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_m)-\sum_{k=1}^K (\langle A_{mk}, X^t\rangle+\nu^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_{mk}) X^{t+1}_{mk}\Big],
\end{split}\end{aligned}$$ and $f:{\mathbb{R}}^K\rightarrow {\mathbb{R}}$ is defined by $f(x)=\log \left(\sum_{i=1}^K e^{x_i}+1\right)$. Note that $\|A\|_{R}$ is the group sparsity penalty defined in .
Logistic-normal Model {#sec:setup_mixed}
---------------------
When there is mixed membership, for each $0\leq t\leq T, 1\leq m\leq M$, the $K \times 1$ vector $X^t_m$ is either the zero vector or a vector on the simplex corresponding to the mixed membership probability of categories, thus we need to address the distribution in two parts: the probability mass of ${{{{\mathbbm{1}}}}_{\{X^{t+1}_m\neq 0\}}}$, and the distribution of $X^{t+1}_m$ given $X^{t+1}_m\neq 0$. Let $Z^{t+1}_m\in \triangle^{K-1}$ be a random vector on the simplex with a distribution to be specified shortly. We model the distribution of $\{X^{t+1}_m\}_{m=1}^M$ conditioned on the past as: $$\label{eq:model_disc}
\begin{split}
X^{t+1}_m = &\begin{cases} Z^{t+1}_m, &\text{ with probability $q_m^{t+1}$},\\
0_K, &\text{ with probability 1-$q_m^{t+1}$},
\end{cases}
\end{split}$$ and further assume conditional independence of entries for $\{X^{t+1}_m\}_{m=1}^M$. For $q^{t+1}\in [0,1]^M$, each element is the probability that an event occurs at the corresponding node and time $t+1$. We specify how $q^{t+1}$ is modeled later.
### Modeling $Z^t$ {#sec:set_up_LN_cts}
$Z^{t+1}_m$ may be modeled by two kinds of distributions widely used for compositional data: the Dirichlet distribution [@bacon2011short] and the logistic-normal distribution [@aitchison1982statistical]. The Dirichlet model gains its popularity in Bayesian statistics, but makes the limiting assumption that the sub-compositions are independent. More specifically, for any r.v. $X\in {\mathbb{R}}^K \sim \mathrm{Dir}(\alpha)$, $$\left(\frac{X_1}{\sum_{i=1}^{k}X_i}, \dots, \frac{X_{k}}{\sum_{i=1}^{k}X_i}\right)\quad \text{and}\quad \left(\frac{X_{k+1}}{\sum_{i=k+1}^{K}X_i}, \dots, \frac{X_{K}}{\sum_{i=k+1}^{K}X_i}\right)$$ are independent for any $1\leq k\leq K-1$. Another difficulty associated with the Dirichlet modelling is the non-convexity of the negative log-likelihood objective which presents challenges both in terms of run-time and from a statistical perspective.
Hence we employ the logistic-normal distribution which (i) has log-concave density function and thus provides fast run-time and more tractable theoretical analysis; (ii) incorporates the potential dependence among sub-compositions in different categories by introducing dependent Gaussian noise in the log-ratio [@atchison1980logistic; @blei2006correlated]. The logistic-normal distribution is also related to the Gumbel-Softmax distribution [@jang2016categorical], which has gained popularity in approximating a categorical distribution using a continuous one. The difference is that the logistic-normal distribution assumes the noise to be Gaussian and is thus more amenable to statistical analysis, whereas the Gumbel-Softmax employs the Gumbel distribution.
Specifically, for any $t\geq 0, 1\leq m\leq M$, given $\{X^{t'}\}_{t'=0}^t$, $$\label{eq:model_cts}
\begin{split}
&\log \frac{Z^{t+1}_{mk}}{Z^{t+1}_{mK}}=\mu^{t+1}_{mk}+\epsilon^{t+1}_{mk}, \quad 1\leq k\leq K-1,\\
&\{\epsilon^{t+1}_m\}_{t,m}{
\mathrel{\overset{i.i.d.}{\scalebox{1.5}[1]{$\sim$}}}
} \mathcal{N}(0,\Sigma), \; \Sigma \in {\mathbb{R}}^{(K-1)\times (K-1)},
\end{split}$$ where $\mu_{mk}^{t+1}$ is a function of the $\{X^{t'}\}_{t'=0}^t$ that we specify below. Here the $K$th category is used as a baseline category, so that we could transform $Z^{t+1}_m\in \triangle^{K-1}$ to log-ratios $\log \frac{Z^{t+1}_{mk}}{Z^{t+1}_{mK}}, k=1,\dots,K-1$, which take values on the entire ${\mathbb{R}}^{K-1}$ and can be modeled by a multivariate normal distribution.
$\mu^{t+1}_{mk}$ is the relative intensity of {node $m$, category $k$} compared to {node $m$, category $K$} at time $t+1$, given the past. $\epsilon^{t+1}_{m}\in \mathbb{R}^{(K-1)}$ is a Gaussian noise vector with covariance $\Sigma\in \mathbb{R}^{(K-1)\times (K-1)}$. To model $\mu^{t+1}_{mk}$, let $A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}\in \mathbb{R}^{M \times (K-1) \times M \times K}$ encode the network, where $A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_{mkm'k'}$ is the relative influence exerted upon {node $m$, category $k$} relative to {node $m$, category $K$} by {node $m'$, category $k'$}. We can also think of this network as a collection of $K\times (K-1)$ relative sub-networks among the $M$ nodes, parameterized by $\{A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_{:,k,:,k'}\in {\mathbb{R}}^{M\times M},1\leq k\leq K-1,1\leq k'\leq K\}$. Let $\nu^{{\mathrm{LN}}}\in \mathbb{R}^{M\times (K-1)}$ be the corresponding intercept term, where $\nu^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_{mk}$ is the intensity of {node $m$, category $k$} compared to {node $m$, category $K$}. Then we define $$\mu^{t+1}_{mk}=\left\langle A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_{mk},X^{t}\right\rangle+\nu^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_{mk}.$$
Using a different baseline category does not change our model form, but only reparameterizes the model parameters. Specifically, if we take a different category, say $l$, as the baseline and want to model the distribution of $\log \frac{Z^{t+1}_{mk}}{Z^{t+1}_{ml}}$, then the model can be equivalently written as: $$\begin{split}
&\log \frac{Z^{t+1}_{mk}}{Z^{t+1}_{ml}}=\left\langle \widetilde{A}^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_{mk},X^t\right\rangle+\widetilde{\nu}^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_{mk}+\widetilde{\epsilon}^{t+1}_{mk}, \quad 1\leq k\leq K, k\neq l,\\
&\{\widetilde{\epsilon}^{t+1}_m\}_{t,m}{
\mathrel{\overset{i.i.d.}{\scalebox{1.5}[1]{$\sim$}}}
} \mathcal{N}(0,\widetilde{\Sigma}), \; \widetilde{\Sigma} \in {\mathbb{R}}^{(K-1)\times (K-1)},
\end{split}$$ where $\widetilde{A}^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_{mk}=A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_{mk}-A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_{ml}, k\notin \{l,K\}$, $\widetilde{A}^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_{mK}=-A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_{ml}$; $\widetilde{\nu}^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_{mk}=\nu^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_{mk}-\nu^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_{ml}, k\notin \{l,K\}$, $\widetilde{\nu}^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_{mK}=-\nu^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_{ml}$; $\widetilde{\epsilon}^{t+1}_m$ is transformed from $\epsilon^{t+1}_m$ through a linear full rank transformation, thus $\widetilde{\Sigma}$ is still of full rank (function of $\Sigma$). The interpretation of $\widetilde{A}^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_{mk}$ is the relative influence exerted upon {node $m$, category $k$} relative to {node $m$, category $l$}. Therefore, our model is invariant to the choice of the baseline category; this choice only affects the interpretation of parameters. It is up to the practitioner to choose the baseline depending on what they want to learn. In particular, if we choose a baseline category where the influence upon other categories is weak, then the relative influences upon other categories compared to the baseline are close to the absolute influences upon them. In Section \[sec:real\_data\] we will discuss our choice of the baseline category for each real data example.
### Modeling $q^t$
We now discuss models for the event probability $q^{t+1}$ in and study the following two cases: (a) $q^{t+1}$ is a constant vector across $t$ which can be specified by $q\in\mathbb{R}^M$ and (b) $q^{t+1}$ depends on the past $X^t$.
#### Constant $q^t=q$:
This model is reasonable if we consider event rates that are constant over time or multi-node compositional time series. For example, users on social media may have constant activity levels or compositional data ([*e.g.,* ]{}labor/expenditure statistics) for each node ([*e.g.,* ]{}state/country) are released on a regular schedule. The latter case can be thought of as a special case with $q=1$ [^1]. In the case of constant $q^t$, we only estimate $A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}\in \mathbb{R}^{M\times (K-1)\times M\times K}$, and assume $\nu^{{\mathrm{LN}}}$ to be known for ease of exposition, while $q$ and the covariance matrix $\Sigma$ are unknown nuisance parameters. We define the estimator as the minimizer of a penalized squared error loss: $$\label{eq:est_cq}
\widehat{A}^{{\mathrm{LN}}}={\mathop{\rm arg\min}}_{A\in {\mathbb{R}}^{M\times (K-1)\times M\times K}} L^{{\mathrm{LN}}}(A)+\lambda \|A\|_{R},$$ where $$\label{eq:gsm_loss}
\begin{split}
L^{{\mathrm{LN}}}(A)=&\frac{1}{2T}\sum_{t,m}{{{{\mathbbm{1}}}}_{\{X^{t+1}_m\neq 0\}}}\|Y^{t+1}_m-\mu^{t+1}_m(A_m)\|_2^2,\\
Y^t_{mk}=&\begin{cases}
\log(X^t_{mk}/X^t_{mK}),&X^t_m\neq 0\\
0,&X^t_m= 0
\end{cases}, \qquad 1\leq k\leq K-1\\
\mu^t_{m}(A)=&\langle A_{m},X^{t-1}\rangle+\nu^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_{m}\in {\mathbb{R}}^{K-1}.
\end{split}$$
Note that if $\Sigma=I_{K-1}$, the squared loss is exactly the negative log-likelihood loss, while for a general $\Sigma$, this loss is still applicable without knowing $\Sigma$. One may note that $q$ does not appear in the objective function. This is due to the fact that the log-likelihood can be written as summation of a function of $A$ and a function of $q$, and thus we could directly minimize an objective function that does not depend on $q$.
#### $q^t$ depends on past events:
We model $q^{t+1}$ using the logistic link: for $1\leq m\leq M$, $$\label{eq:q_A_dis}
q_m^{t+1}=\frac{\exp\{\langle B^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}_m,X^t\rangle+\eta^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}_m\}}{1+\exp\{\langle B^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}_m,X^t\rangle+\eta^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}_m\}},$$ where $B^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}\in \mathbb{R}^{M\times M\times K}$, and $B^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}_{mm'k'}$ is the overall influence exerted on node $m$ by {node $m'$, category $k'$}, while $\eta^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}\in \mathbb{R}^{M}$ is the offset parameter. If we set $B^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}=0$ this reduces to the constant $q^t=q$ case with $q_m=\left(1+\exp\{-\nu^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_{m}\}\right)^{-1}$. In general, our goal is to jointly estimate $A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}$ and $B^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}$, while $\nu^{{\mathrm{LN}}}$ and $\eta^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}$ are assumed known for ease of exposition, and the covariance matrix $\Sigma$ is regarded as an unknown nuisance parameter.
The loss function $L^{{\mathrm{LN}}}(A)$ defined in can still be used to estimate $A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}$; while for $B^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}$, we can define $L^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}(B)$ as the log-likelihood loss of the Bernoulli distributed ${{{{\mathbbm{1}}}}_{\{X^t_m\neq 0\}}}$: $$\label{eq:Ber_loss}
\begin{split}
&L^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}(B)=\frac{1}{T}\sum_{t,m} f(\langle B_m, X^t\rangle+\eta_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}) -(\langle B_m, X^t\rangle+\eta_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}){{{{\mathbbm{1}}}}_{\{X^{t+1}_m\neq 0\}}},
\end{split}$$ where $f:{\mathbb{R}}\rightarrow {\mathbb{R}}$ is defined by $f(x)=\log \left(e^{x}+1\right)$.To exploit the sparsity structure shared by $A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}$ and $B^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}$, we pool the two loss functions together and add a group sparsity penalty on $A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}$ and $B^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}$. To account for various noise levels $\Sigma$, we put different weights on the two losses, and intuitively the weight on $L^{{\mathrm{LN}}}(A)$ should be smaller if $\Sigma$ is large. Formally, $$\label{eq:est_q_past}
\begin{split}
(\widehat{A}^{{\mathrm{LN}}},\widehat{B}^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}&)={\mathop{\rm arg\min}}_{\substack{A\in \mathbb{R}^{M\times (K-1)\times M\times K}\\B\in \mathbb{R}^{M\times M\times K}}} \alpha L^{{\mathrm{LN}}}(A) +(1-\alpha)L^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}(B) +\lambda R_{\alpha}(A,B).
\end{split}$$ The penalty term $R_{\alpha}(A,B)$ is defined as $$R_{\alpha}(A,B)=\sum_{m,m'}\left(\alpha\|A_{m,:,m',:}\|_{F}^2+(1-\alpha)\|B_{m,m',:}\|_2^2\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}.$$ If we let $\alpha=0.5$, this type of estimator has been widely seen in the literature of multi-task learning [@zhang2017survey; @obozinski2006multi; @lounici2009taking]. When $\alpha=0$ or $1$, we are estimating $A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}$ or $B^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}$ only and the penalty is $\lambda \|A\|_R$ or $\lambda \|B\|_R$, respectively.
Interpreting the Relative and Absolute Network Parameters {#sec:network_interpretation}
---------------------------------------------------------
So far we have defined an absolute network parameter $A^{{\mathrm{MN}}}$ for the multinomial model and a relative network parameter $A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}$ for the logistic-normal model. In this section we discuss how to interpret and connect these parameters. As we have mentioned previously, $A^{{\mathrm{MN}}}\in {\mathbb{R}}^{M\times K\times M\times K}$ is an [*absolute*]{} network parameter where each entry measures the [*absolute*]{} influence for each node, category pair; $A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}\in{\mathbb{R}}^{M\times (K-1)\times M\times K}$ is a [*relative*]{} network parameter whose entries measure the [*relative*]{} influence on each node category pair [*relative*]{} to the same node and a “baseline” category (encoded as category $K$) chosen by the practitioner.
Note that there exists a simple transformation from the absolute network $A^{\mathrm{abs}}$ to the relative network $A^{\mathrm{rel}}$ as follows: $$\label{eq:network_transform}
A^{\mathrm{rel}}_{mk}=A^{\mathrm{abs}}_{mk}-A^{\mathrm{abs}}_{mK},\quad 1\leq m\leq M, 1\leq k\leq K-1.$$ However, the absolute network can not be determined from the relative network due to that we don’t know the absolute influence upon the baseline category. For comparison purposes, one could contrast the estimated relative network transformed for the multinomial approach using Eq. and estimated relative network for the logistic-normal approach. In the simulations and real data sections, we present three network estimates, the estimated absolute and relative networks for the multinomial model and the estimated relative network for the logistic-normal model .
Connection to Prior Work
------------------------
In this section, we discuss connections between our model and existing approaches in the literature.
#### Connection to Point Process Literature:
Our work is most closely related to [@hall2016inference], which discusses a discrete-time modeling approach for point process data. More specifically, they investigate high-dimensional generalized linear autoregressive process: $$X^{t+1}|X^t\sim P(\nu+A^{*}X^t),$$ where $\{X_t\in {\mathbb{R}}^M\}_{t=0}^T$ is the observed time series data, $\nu\in {\mathbb{R}}^M$ is a known offset parameter, and $A^*\in {\mathbb{R}}^{M\times M}$ is the network parameter of interest. [@hall2016inference] specify $P$ to be the product measure of independent Poisson or Bernoulli distributions. Specifically, for a Bernoulli autoregressive process the model is: $$\label{eq:model_BAR}
{\mathbb{P}}(X^{t+1}|X^t)=\prod_{m=1}^M\frac{\exp\{(\nu_m+A_m^{*\top} X^t)X^{t+1}_m\}}{1+\exp\{\nu_m+A_m^{*\top} X^t\}}.$$ This model ignores the context/categorical information of the events, which is what our methods aim to capture.
When there is only one exact category for each event, the multinomial model can estimate the category-dependent network as a natural extension from Bernoulli autoregressive process. However, when the event presents imprecise mixed membership in multiple categories, there is no established model that can be directly applied or naturally extended for this type of data. Our logistic-normal approach , combines ideas from compositional time series and autoregressive process framework.
As illustrated by [@mark2018network], the multivariate Hawkes process [@hawkes1971spectra; @daley2003introduction; @yang2017online] can be discretized and represented as a Poisson generlized linear ARMA model. [@mark2018network] consider analysis that involves a moving average term, while since the focus of this paper is mainly network influence, we only consider the autoregressive model without a moving average term.
#### Connection to Compositional Time Series:
Compositional time series arise from the study of labor statistics [@brunsdon1998time], expenditure shares [@mills2010forecasting] and industrial production [@kynvclova2015modeling]. In a classical setup, one would observe a time series $\{X^t\}_{t=0}^{T}$ where $X^t\in {\mathbb{R}}^K$ lies on a simplex $\triangle^{K-1}$, representing the composition of a quantity of interest (i.e. proportion belonging to each category). Directly modeling compositional time series data is difficult because the observations are all constrained on the simplex. This challenge can be avoided by modeling the data after transforming the data via taking the log of ratios between each category and some baseline category as discussed earlier. In classical compositional time series analysis, we might use an ARMA model to describe the transformed data. Our [*logistic-normal*]{} model is closely connected to the compositional time series models, but deviates from this classical setting in two ways. On the one hand, even when we consider the special case where event probability $q=1$, we have a multi-variate compositional time series (one for each node in our network), and so our model reflects not only an ARMA model for each node independently, but also the autoregressive model of [*interactions*]{} between them. A more significant difference is that we consider the scenario where there is [*no event*]{} during a time period $t$ for node $m$ meaning $X^t_m= 0_{K}$ instead of lying on the simplex. This presents a significant methodological challenge as discussed earlier and we cannot simply apply the log ratio transformations to all $X^t_m$. Hence we introduce a latent variable $Z^t_m$ lying on the simplex to address this issue: we only apply the log-ratio transformation on $Z^t_m$ when modeling the conditional distribution of $Z^{t}_m$ given $X^{t-1}$, and with probability $q^t_m$ we observe $X^t_m=Z^t_m$, otherwise $X^t_m=0_K$.
Theoretical Guarantees {#sec:theory}
======================
In this section we derive the estimation error bounds for the three estimators defined in Section \[sec:set\_up\_mult\], Section \[sec:setup\_mixed\], under each corresponding set-up. We first introduce sparsity and boundedness notions that will appear in the theoretical results. In particular, for the multinomial model , we define the following notions:
- [**Group sparsity parameters**]{}: For $1\leq m\leq M$, let $S^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_m:=\{m':\|A^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_{m,:,m',:}\|_{F}>0\}$ be the set of nodes that have influence on node $m$ in any category, sparsity $\rho^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_m:=|S^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_m|$, and $\rho^{{\mathrm{MN}}}:=\max_{1\leq m\leq M}\rho^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_m$. Further let $s^{{\mathrm{MN}}}:= \sum_{m=1}^M{\rho^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_m}$.
- [**Boundedness parameters**]{}: Let $R^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_{\max}:=\|A^{{\mathrm{MN}}}\|_{\infty,\infty,1,\infty}=\max_{m,k}\sum_{m'}\max_{k'}|A^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_{mkm'k'}|$.
For the logistic-normal model with constant event probability (, with $q^t=q$), we can define $S^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_m$, $\rho^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_m$, $\rho^{{\mathrm{LN}}}$, $s^{{\mathrm{LN}}}$ and $R_{\max}^{{\mathrm{LN}}}$ similarly from above, except that we substitute $A^{{\mathrm{MN}}}$ by $A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}$. While for the logistic-normal model with event probability depending on the past (, , ), we assume shared sparsity in $A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}$ and $B^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}$ among nodes, and both of them need to be bounded. Thus under this model, we define $S^{{\mathrm{LN}},{\mathrm{Bern}}}_m$, $\rho^{{\mathrm{LN}},{\mathrm{Bern}}}_m$, $\rho^{{\mathrm{LN}},{\mathrm{Bern}}}$, $s^{{\mathrm{LN}},{\mathrm{Bern}}}$ and $R_{\max}^{{\mathrm{LN}},{\mathrm{Bern}}}$ similarly from above, except that we substitute $A^{{\mathrm{MN}}}$ by the concatenated tensor $(A^{{\mathrm{LN}}},B^{{\mathrm{Bern}}})\in {\mathbb{R}}^{M\times K\times M\times K}$ (concatenated in the second dimension).
Multinomial Model {#sec:thm_mult}
-----------------
\[thm:mult\] Consider the generation process and estimator . If $\lambda=CK\sqrt{\frac{\log M}{T}}$, $T\geq C_1(\rho^{{\mathrm{MN}}})^2\log M$, then with probability at least $1-C\exp\{-c\log M\}$, $$\left\|\widehat{A}^{{\mathrm{MN}}}-A^{{\mathrm{MN}}}\right\|^2_{F}\leq C_2\frac{s^{{\mathrm{MN}}}\log M}{T},\quad \left\|\widehat{A}^{{\mathrm{MN}}}-A^{{\mathrm{MN}}}\right\|_{R}\leq C_3s^{{\mathrm{MN}}}\sqrt{\frac{\log M}{T}},$$ where constants $c, C>0$ are universal constants, while $C_1, C_2, C_3>0$ depend only on $R^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_{\max}$, $\|\nu^{{\mathrm{MN}}}\|_{\infty}$ and $K$.
The proof can be found in Section \[sec:proof\_mult\].
This type of estimation error bound is widely seen in the high-dimensional statistics literature (see [*e.g.,* ]{} [@bickel2009simultaneous; @zhang2017survey]). As in [@hall2016inference] and [@mark2018network], a martingale concentration inequality is applied to adapt to the time series setting, and the major difference in this proof from past work includes lower bounds on the strong convexity parameter for our multinomial loss function, and the eigenvalues of covariance matrices of multinomial random vectors.
Logistic-normal Model with Constant $q^t=q$ {#sec:thm_cq}
-------------------------------------------
\[thm:cq\] Consider the generation process , with $q^t=q$, and estimator . If $T\geq C_1\frac{(\rho^{{\mathrm{LN}}})^2\log M}{\min_{m} q_{m}^2}$, $\lambda=CK\max_{k}\Sigma_{kk}\sqrt{\frac{\max_{m}T_{m}\log M}{T^2}}$, where $T_{m}=\sum_{t=1}^{T}{{{{\mathbbm{1}}}}_{\{X^{t}_{m}\neq 0\}}}$, then with probability at least $1-C\exp\{-c\log M\}$, $$\begin{split}
\|\widehat{A}^{{\mathrm{LN}}}-A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}\|_{F}^2 \leq C_2\frac{\max_{m}q_{m}}{\min_m q_m^2}\frac{s^{{\mathrm{LN}}}\log M}{T},\\
\|\widehat{A}^{{\mathrm{LN}}} -A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}\|_{R} \leq C_3s^{{\mathrm{LN}}}\sqrt{\frac{\max_{m}q_{m}}{\min_m q_m^2}\frac{\log M}{T}},
\end{split}$$ Here $c, C>0$ are universal constants, while constants $C_1, C_2, C_3>0$ depend only on $R^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_{\max}$, $\|\nu^{{\mathrm{LN}}}\|_{\infty}$, $\|\Sigma\|_{\infty}$, $\lambda_{\min}(\Sigma)$ and $K$.
The proof is provided in Section \[sec:proof\_cq\].
The error bounds in Theorem \[thm:cq\] have an extra factor depending on $q$. If $q_m=q_0$ for $1\le m \le M$ and some $0<q_0<1$, then this factor becomes $\frac{1}{q_0}$. If $q_m$’s differ too much from each other, a better choice is to use specific $\lambda_m=C\sqrt{\frac{|\mathcal{T}_{m}|\log M}{T^2}}$ for the estimation of each $A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_m$, which would lead to a term $\frac{1}{q_m}$ instead of $\frac{\max_{m'}q_{m'}}{q_m^2}$ in the error bounds. This extra factor can be understood as follows: under the multinomial model , the number of samples for estimating $A^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_m$ is $T$, while in this section, the expected number of samples is $q_mT$ for estimating $A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_m$.
The estimation error rates for the other two models do not depend on ${\mathbb{P}}(X^{t}_m\neq 0)$ ($q^t_m$ under this model) in this way, since no event at time $t$ also reveals useful information for estimating their network parameters: $P(X^t_m\neq 0|X^{t-1})$ depends on network parameters under the other two models, but is a constant under this model.
Logistic-normal Model with $q^t$ Depending on the Past {#sec:thm_q_past}
------------------------------------------------------
\[thm:q\_A\] Consider the generation process , , and estimator for some $0\leq \alpha<1$.[^2] If $T\geq \frac{C_1}{1-\alpha}(\rho^{{\mathrm{LN}},{\mathrm{Bern}}})^2\log M$, $\lambda=C_2(\alpha)K\sqrt{\frac{\log M}{T}}$then with probability at least $1-C\exp\{-c\log M\}$,$$\begin{split}
\alpha\|\widehat{A}^{{\mathrm{LN}}}-A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}\|_{F}^2+(1-\alpha)\|\widehat{B}^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}-B^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}\|_{F}^2 \leq& C_3 C_2(\alpha)\frac{s^{{\mathrm{LN}},{\mathrm{Bern}}}\log M}{T},\\
R_{\alpha}(\widehat{A}^{{\mathrm{LN}}}-A^{{\mathrm{LN}}},\widehat{B}^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}-B^{{\mathrm{Bern}}})\leq &C_4 C_2(\alpha)s^{{\mathrm{LN}},{\mathrm{Bern}}}\sqrt{\frac{\log M}{T}},
\end{split}$$ where $c>0$ is a universal constant, $C_1, C_3, C_4>0$ depend only on $K$, $R^{{\mathrm{LN}},{\mathrm{Bern}}}_{\max}$, $\|\Sigma\|_{\infty}$, $\lambda_{\min}(\Sigma)$, $\|\nu^{{\mathrm{LN}}}\|_{\infty}$, $\|\eta^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}\|_{\infty}$, and $C_2(\alpha)=\left[C_5\max_k \Sigma_{kk}\alpha+C_6(1-\alpha)\right]^{\frac{1}{2}}$ for some universal constants $C_5, C_6>0$.
The proof can be found in Section \[sec:proof\_q\_A\]. When $0<\alpha<1$, the estimation errors for $A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}$ and $B^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}$ are implied directly, although they may be loose in their dependence on $\alpha$. It’s difficult to determine an optimal $\alpha$ for estimation based on the theoretical result. Intuitively we need $\alpha$ to be away from 0 and 1 so that we boost the estimation performance by pooling the two estimation tasks together.We will demonstrate the interplay between $\alpha$ and the noise level $\Sigma$ in terms of estimation errors in the numerical results in Section \[sec:simulation\_q\_A\].
Proofs {#sec:proofs}
======
In this section we provide proofs for Theorem \[thm:mult\], \[thm:cq\] and \[thm:q\_A\]. Proofs for the lemmas are deferred to the appendix.
Proof of Theorem \[thm:mult\] {#sec:proof_mult}
-----------------------------
We prove the error bounds for arbitrary $1\leq m\leq M$ and then take a union bound. Let $\Delta_m\in \mathbb{R}^{K\times M\times K}$, and define $$\begin{split}
F(\Delta_m)=& L_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}}(A_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}}+\Delta_m)-L_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}}(A_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}})+\lambda \|A_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}}+\Delta_m\|_R-\lambda \|A_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}}\|_R,
\end{split}$$ where $$L_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}}(A_m)=\frac{1}{T}\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}\left[f(\langle A_m, X^{t}\rangle+\nu^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_m)-\sum_{k=1}^K \langle A_{mk}, X^t\rangle X^{t+1}_{mk}\right],\quad f(x)=\log \left(\sum_{i=1}^K e^{x_i}+1\right),$$ and $$\|A_m\|_R=\sum_{m'=1}^M\|A_{m,:,m',:}\|_F.$$ Our goal is to show that if $F(\Delta_m)\leq 0$, the following holds with high probability: $$\label{eq:err_bounds_mult}
\|\Delta_m\|_F^2\leq \frac{C\rho^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_m\log M}{T},\quad\|\Delta_m\|_R\leq C\rho^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_m\sqrt{\frac{\log M}{T}}.$$ The following lemma shows that we only need to prove the claim above for $\|\Delta_m\|_R\leq C$.
\[lem:bounded\_err\] For any convex function $g$ and norm $\|\cdot\|$, if $g(0)=0$, $g(x)>0$ as long as $\|x\|= C$, then $g(x)\leq 0$ implies $\|x\|<C$.
Since $F(\cdot)$ is convex, we only need to show that $F(\Delta_m)\leq 0$ and $\|\Delta_m\|_R\leq C$ imply the error bounds . This is because that the error bounds suggest $\|\Delta_m\|_R\leq C\rho^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_m\sqrt{\frac{\log M}{T}}<C$, thus the condition in Lemma \[lem:bounded\_err\] holds.
Denote the Bregman divergence induced by any function $g$ as $D_g(\cdot, \cdot)$, then if $F(\Delta_m)\leq 0$, $$\label{eq:std_eq_mult}
\begin{split}
D_{L_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}}}(A_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}}+\Delta_m,A_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}})\leq &-\langle \nabla L_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}}(A_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}}),\Delta_m\rangle+\lambda \|A_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}}\|_R-\lambda \|A_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}}+\Delta_m\|_R,
\end{split}$$ The following lemmas provide an upper bound for the R.H.S.
\[lem:dev\_bnd\_mult\] Under the model generation process , with probability at least $1-\exp\{-c\log M\}$, $$\left\|L_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}}(A_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}})\right\|_{R^*}< CK\sqrt{\frac{\log M}{T}}\leq \frac{\lambda}{2},$$ where $C>0$ is a universal constant.
Thus we can bound the R.H.S. of by $$\frac{\lambda}{2}\|\Delta_m\|_{R}+\lambda\|\Delta_{m,:,S_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}},:}\|_R-\lambda\|\Delta_{m,:,(S_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}})^c,:}\|_R\leq \frac{3\lambda}{2}\|\Delta_{m,:,S_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}},:}\|_R-\frac{\lambda}{2}\|\Delta_{m,:,(S_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}})^c,:}\|_R.$$ By the definition of $L_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}}$, $$\begin{split}
D_{L_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}}}(A_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}}+\Delta_m,A_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}})=&\frac{1}{T}\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}D_f(\langle A_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}}, X^t\rangle+\nu^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_m+\langle \Delta_m,X^t\rangle,\langle A_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}}, X^t\rangle+\nu^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_m)\\
\geq &\frac{1}{T}\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}\frac{\lambda_{\min}(\nabla^2f(\xi^t))}{2}\|\langle \Delta_m,X^t\rangle\|_2^2,
\end{split}$$ where $\xi^t\in{\mathbb{R}}^K$ is some point lying between $\langle A_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}}+\Delta_m,X^t\rangle+\nu_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}}$ and $\langle A^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_m,X^t\rangle+\nu_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}}$. Since we have assumed $$\|A^{{\mathrm{MN}}}\|_{\infty,\infty,1,\infty}\leq R_{\max}^{{\mathrm{MN}}},\quad \|\Delta_m\|_R\leq C,$$ we know $\langle A_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}}+\Delta_m,X^t\rangle+\nu^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_m,\langle A^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_m,X^t\rangle+\nu^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_m\in [-C,C]^K$ where $C$ depends on $R_{\max}^{{\mathrm{MN}}}, \|\nu^{{\mathrm{MN}}}\|_{\infty}$, and thus $\xi^t\in [-C,C]^K$.
The next step is to lower bound $\lambda_{\min}(\nabla^2 f(\xi^t))$. First we calculate the Hessian matrix of $f$: $$\left(\nabla^2 f(x)\right)_{ij}=-\frac{e^{x_i+x_j}}{\left(\sum_{k=1}^K e^{x_k}+1\right)^2}+\frac{e^{x_i}{{{{\mathbbm{1}}}}_{\{i=j\}}}}{\sum_{k=1}^K e^{x_k}+1},$$ then for any $u\in {\mathbb{R}}^K$, $$\begin{split}
u^\top \nabla^2 f(x)u=&\sum_{i,j}u_iu_j \left(\nabla^2 f(x)\right)_{ij}\\
=&\left(\sum_{k=1}^K e^{x_k}+1\right)^{-2}\left\{-\left(\sum_{i=1}^K u_ie^{x_i}\right)^2+\left(\sum_{i=1}^K u_i^2e^{x_i}\right)\left(\sum_{i=1}^K e^{x_i}+1\right)\right\}\\
\geq &\left(\sum_{k=1}^K e^{x_k}+1\right)^{-2}\left(\sum_{i=1}^K u_i^2e^{x_i}\right)\\
\geq &\|u\|_2^2 \min_i e^{x_i}\left(\sum_{k=1}^K e^{x_k}+1\right)^{-2}.
\end{split}$$ The third line is due to Cauchey-Schwartz inequality: $$\left(\sum_{i=1}^K u_ie^{x_i}\right)^2=\left(\sum_{i=1}^K u_ie^{\frac{x_i}{2}}e^{\frac{x_i}{2}}\right)^2\leq \left(\sum_{i=1}^K u_i^2e^{x_i}\right)\left(\sum_{i=1}^K e^{x_i}\right).$$ Therefore, $\lambda_{\min}(\nabla^2 f(\xi^t))\geq \frac{e^{-C}}{\left(K e^{C}+1\right)^{2}}> 0$. Combining this with , we know that $$\label{eq:Delta_Cone_mult}
\left\|(\Delta_m)_{:,(S_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}})^c,:}\right\|_{R}\leq 3\left\|(\Delta_m)_{:,S_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}},:}\right\|_{R},$$
Now we would like to lower bound $\frac{1}{T}\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}\left\|\langle \Delta_m, X^t\rangle\right\|_2^2$ with the following restricted eigenvalue condition. First we define set ${\mathcal{C}}(S,\kappa)$ of $K\times M\times K$ tensors, for any set $S\subseteq \{1,\dots,M\}$, and constant $\kappa>0$: $${\mathcal{C}}(S,\kappa)=\{U\in {\mathbb{R}}^{K\times M\times K}: \left\|U_{:,S^c,:}\right\|_{R}\leq \kappa\left\|U_{:,S,:}\right\|_{R}\}.$$
\[lem:REC\_mult\] Under the model generation process , if $T\geq C_1(\rho^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_m)^2\log M$, then with probability at least $1-\exp\left\{-c_1\log M\right\}$, $$\inf_{U\in {\mathcal{C}}(S_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}},3)}\frac{1}{T}\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}\frac{\left\|\langle U, X^t\rangle\right\|_2^2}{\|U\|_F^2}\geq c_2,$$ where $c_1>0$ is a universal constant and $C_1, c_2>0$ depend on $K, R_{\max}^{{\mathrm{MN}}}, \|\nu^{{\mathrm{MN}}}\|_{\infty}$.
By , $\Delta_m\in {\mathcal{C}}(S_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}},3)$. Therefore, with probability at least $1-C\exp\left\{-c\log M\right\}$, $$\left\|\Delta_m\right\|_{F}^2\leq C\lambda\left\|(\Delta_m)_{:,S_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}},:}\right\|_{R}\leq C\lambda\sqrt{\rho^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_m}\left\|(\Delta_m)\right\|_{F}$$ which further implies, $$\left\|\Delta_m\right\|_{F}\leq C_1\sqrt{\frac{\rho^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_m\log M}{T}}$$ and $$\left\|\Delta_m\right\|_{R}\leq 4\left\|(\Delta_m)_{:,S_m^{{\mathrm{MN}}},:}\right\|_{R}\leq 4\sqrt{\rho^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_m}\left\|\Delta_m\right\|_{F}\leq C_2\rho^{{\mathrm{MN}}}_m\sqrt{\frac{\log M}{T}},$$ where constant $C_1, C_2>0$ depend only on $R_{\max}^{{\mathrm{MN}}}, \|\nu^{{\mathrm{MN}}}\|_{\infty}$ and $K$.
Proof of Theorem \[thm:cq\] {#sec:proof_cq}
---------------------------
We follow similar steps from the proof of Theorem \[thm:mult\]. Here for any $\Delta_m\in {\mathbb{R}}^{(K-1)\times M\times K}$ we define $F(\Delta_m)$ as $$\begin{split}
F(\Delta_m)=& L_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}(A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}+\Delta_m)-L_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}(A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}})+\lambda \|A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}+\Delta_m\|_R-\lambda \|A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}\|_R,
\end{split}$$ where $L_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}(A_m)=\frac{1}{2T}\sum_{t\in \mathcal{T}_m}\|Y^{t+1}_m-\mu^{t+1}_m(A_m)\|_2^2$. We will prove that $F(\Delta_m)\leq 0$ implies the error bounds for $\Delta_m$. We start with the standard equations $$\label{eq:std_eq_GSM_cq}
\begin{split}
D_{L_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}}(A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}+\Delta_m,A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}})\leq -\langle \nabla L_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}(A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}),\Delta_m\rangle+\lambda \|A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}\|_R-\lambda\|A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}+\Delta_m\|_R.
\end{split}$$
\[lem:db\_GSM\_cq\] Under the data generation process and with $q^t=q$, $$\begin{aligned}
\left\| \nabla L_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}(A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}})\right\|_{R^*}\leq CK\max_k\Sigma_{kk}\sqrt{\frac{\log M|\mathcal{T}_m|}{T^2}}\leq \frac{\lambda}{2}.\end{aligned}$$ With probability at least $1-\exp(-c\log M)$, for universal constants $c, C>0$.
Similarly we can also write $$-\langle \nabla L_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}(A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}),\Delta_m\rangle+\lambda \|A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}\|_R-\lambda\|A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}+\Delta_m\|_R\leq \frac{3\lambda}{2}\|\Delta_{m,:,S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}},:}\|_R-\frac{\lambda}{2}\|\Delta_{m,:,(S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}})^c,:}\|_R,$$ and thus $\|\Delta_{m,:,(S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}})^c,:}\|_R\leq 3\|\Delta_{m,:,S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}},:}\|_R$. By the definition of $L_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}$, $D_{L_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}}(A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}+\Delta_m,A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}})=\frac{1}{2T}\sum_{t\in {\mathcal{T}}_m}\|\langle \Delta_m,X^t\rangle\|_2^2$, and it can be lower bounded based on the following Lemma that holds for ${\mathcal{C}}(S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}},3)=\{U\in {\mathbb{R}}^{(K-1)\times M\times K}: \left\|U_{:,(S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}})^c,:}\right\|_{R}\leq \kappa\left\|U_{:,S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}},:}\right\|_{R}\}$,
\[lem:REC\_GSM\_cq\] Under the data generation process and with $q^t=q$, if $T\geq C_1\frac{(\rho^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_m)^2\log M}{q_m^2}$, $$\inf_{U\in {\mathcal{C}}(S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}},3)}\frac{1}{2T\|U\|_F^2}\sum_{t\in \mathcal{T}_m}\|\langle U,X^t\rangle\|_2^2\geq c_1q_m,$$ with probability at least $1-\exp\{-c\log M\}$. Here $C_1, c_1>0$ depend only on $R_{\max}^{{\mathrm{LN}}}$, $\|\nu^{{\mathrm{LN}}}\|_{\infty}$, $\|\Sigma\|_{\infty}$, $\lambda_{\min}(\Sigma)$ and $K$.
Due to Lemma \[lem:REC\_GSM\_cq\], with probability at least $1-C\exp\{-c\log M\}$, $$\begin{split}
\|\Delta_m\|_F^2 \leq &C\frac{\lambda}{q_m}\|\Delta_{m,S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}}\|_R\leq C\sqrt{\frac{\rho^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_m\log M\max_{m'}|\mathcal{T}_{m'}|}{q_m^2T^2}}\|\Delta_m\|_F,\\
\|\Delta_m\|_R\leq &C\rho^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_m\sqrt{\frac{\log M\max_{m'}|\mathcal{T}_{m'}|}{q_m^2 T^2}}.
\end{split}$$ The following lemma provides an upper bound for $|\mathcal{T}_m|$:
\[lem:T\_m\_bnd\] $${\mathbb{P}}\left(|\mathcal{T}_m|>2q_mT\right)\leq \exp\{-2q_m^2T\}.$$
Therefore, if $T\geq C_1\max_m \frac{(\rho^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_m)^2\log M}{q_m^2}$, with probability at least $1-C\exp\{-c_1\log M\}$, $$\begin{split}
\|\Delta_m\|_F^2 \leq & C_2\frac{\max_{m'}q_{m'}}{q_m^2}\frac{\rho^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_m\log M}{T},\\
\|\Delta_m\|_R\leq &C_2\rho^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_m\sqrt{\frac{\max_{m'}q_{m'}}{q_m^2}\frac{\log M}{T}},
\end{split}$$ holds for $1\leq m\leq M$, and thus $$\begin{split}
\|\widehat{A}^{{\mathrm{LN}}}-A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}\|_F^2 \leq & C_2\frac{\max_{m}q_{m}}{\min_{m} q_m^2}\frac{s^{{\mathrm{LN}}}\log M}{T},\\
\|\widehat{A}^{{\mathrm{LN}}}-A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}\|_R\leq &C_2s^{{\mathrm{LN}}}\sqrt{\frac{\max_{m}q_{m}}{\min_m q_m^2}\frac{\log M}{T}}.
\end{split}$$ Here $c_1, C_1, C_2>0$ depend only on $R_{\max}^{{\mathrm{LN}}}$, $\|\nu^{{\mathrm{LN}}}\|_{\infty}$, $\|\Sigma\|_{\infty}$, $\lambda_{\min}(\Sigma)$ and $K$.
Proof of Theorem \[thm:q\_A\] {#sec:proof_q_A}
-----------------------------
Similarly from the previous proofs, we only prove the error bounds for an arbitrary $m$ first. Let $\Delta_m^A\in \mathbb{R}^{(K-1)\times M\times K}$, $\Delta_m^B\in \mathbb{R}^{M\times K}$, and $\Delta_m(\alpha)\in \mathbb{R}^{K\times M\times K}$ be concatenated by $\sqrt{\alpha}\Delta_m^A$ and $\sqrt{1-\alpha}\Delta_m^B$ in the first dimension. Formally, $\Delta_{m,1:(K-1),:,:}(\alpha)=\sqrt{\alpha}\Delta_m^A$, $\Delta_{m,K,:,:}(\alpha)=\sqrt{1-\alpha}\Delta_m^B$. For simplicity, we will omit $\Delta_m(\alpha)$ to $\Delta_m$. Define $$\begin{split}
F(\Delta_m)=&\alpha L_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}(A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}+\Delta_m^A)+(1-\alpha)L_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}(B_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}+\Delta_m^B)+\lambda R_{\alpha}(A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}+\Delta_m^A,B_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}+\Delta_m^B)\\
&-\alpha L_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}(A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}})-(1-\alpha)L_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}(B_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}})-\lambda R_{\alpha}(A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}},B_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}).
\end{split}$$ Our goal is to show that if $F(\Delta_m)\leq 0$, the following holds with high probability: $$\label{eq:err_bounds_q_A}
\begin{split}
\|\Delta_m\|_F^2=\alpha\|\Delta_m^A\|_F^2+(1-\alpha)\|\Delta_m^B\|_F^2\leq \frac{C\rho^{{\mathrm{LN}},{\mathrm{Bern}}}_m\log M}{T},\\
\|\Delta_m\|_R=R_{\alpha}(\Delta_m^A,\Delta_m^B)\leq C\rho^{{\mathrm{LN}},{\mathrm{Bern}}}_m\sqrt{\frac{\log M}{T}}.
\end{split}$$ Given Lemma \[lem:bounded\_err\], we only need to show that $F(\Delta_m)\leq 0$ and $\|\Delta_m\|_R\leq \sqrt{1-\alpha}$ imply the error bounds . This is because that the error bounds suggest $\|\Delta_m\|_R\leq C\rho^{{\mathrm{LN}},{\mathrm{Bern}}}_m\sqrt{\frac{\log M}{T}}<\sqrt{1-\alpha}$, thus the condition in Lemma \[lem:bounded\_err\] holds.
If $F(\Delta_m)\leq 0$, $$\label{eq:std_eq_q_A}
\begin{split}
&\alpha D_{L_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}}(A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}+\Delta_m^A,A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}})+(1-\alpha)D_{L_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}}(B_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}+\Delta_m^B,B_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}})\\
\leq &-\alpha \langle \nabla L_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}(A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}),\Delta_m^A\rangle -(1-\alpha)\langle \nabla L_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}(B_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}),\Delta_m^B\rangle\\
&+\lambda R_{\alpha}(A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}},B_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}})-\lambda R_{\alpha}(A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}+\Delta_m^A,B_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}+\Delta_m^B).
\end{split}$$ The following lemmas provide an upper bound for the R.H.S.
\[lem:db\_GSM\_q\_A\] Under the data generation process , , , with probability at least $1-\exp(-c\log(M))$, $$\begin{aligned}
\left\| \nabla L_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}(A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}})\right\|_{\infty}\leq C\max_k\sqrt{\Sigma_{kk}}\sqrt{\frac{\log(M)}{T}},\end{aligned}$$ for universal constants $c, C>0$.
\[lem:db\_BAR\] Under the data generation process , , , with probability at least $1-\exp(-c\log M)$, $$\left\| \nabla L_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}(B_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}})\right\|_{\infty}\leq C\sqrt{\frac{\log(M)}{T}},$$ for universal constants $c, C>0$.
By Lemma \[lem:db\_GSM\_q\_A\] and Lemma \[lem:db\_BAR\], with probability at least $1-\exp\{-c\log M\}$, $$\begin{split}
&-\alpha\left\langle \nabla L_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}(A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}),\Delta_m^A\right\rangle -(1-\alpha)\left\langle \nabla L_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}(B_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}),\Delta_m^B\right\rangle\\
=&-\sum_{m'=1}^M \left\langle \sqrt{\alpha}(\nabla L_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}(A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}))_{:,m',:},\sqrt{\alpha}\Delta^A_{m,:,m',:}\right\rangle+\left\langle \sqrt{1-\alpha}(\nabla L_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}(B_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}))_{m',:},\sqrt{1-\alpha}\Delta^B_{m,m',:}\right\rangle\\
\leq &\sum_{m'=1}^M\left(\alpha\|\nabla L_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}(A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}})_{:,m',:}\|_F^2+(1-\alpha)\|\nabla L_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}(B_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}})_{m',:}\|_2^2\right)^\frac{1}{2}\|\Delta_{m,:,m',:}(\alpha)\|_F\\
\leq &\left(C_1\alpha(K-1)K\Sigma_{kk}\frac{\log M}{T}+C_2(1-\alpha)K\frac{\log M}{T}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\|\Delta_m\|_R\\
\leq &\left(C_1(K-1)\max_k\Sigma_{kk}\alpha+C_2(1-\alpha)\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\sqrt{\frac{K\log M}{T}}\|\Delta_m\|_R.
\end{split}$$ Setting $\lambda=C(\alpha)K\sqrt{\frac{\log M}{T}}$, where $C(\alpha)=\left[C_1\max_k \Sigma_{kk}\alpha+C_2(1-\alpha)\right]^{\frac{1}{2}}$ for some universal constants $C_1, C_2>0$. Then we have $$-\alpha\left\langle \nabla L_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}(A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}),\Delta_m^A\right\rangle -(1-\alpha)\left\langle \nabla L_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}(B_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}),\Delta_m^B\right\rangle\leq \frac{\lambda}{2}\|\Delta_m\|_R.$$ Let $S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}}=\{(i,j,k):\alpha\|A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}_{m,:,j,:}\|_F^2+(1-\alpha)\|B^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}_{m,:,j,:}\|_F^2>0\}$ be the support set of $A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}$ and $B_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}$, then we can write $$\begin{split}
&R_{\alpha}(A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}},B_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}})-R_{\alpha}(\widehat{A}_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}},\widehat{B}_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}})\\
=&R_{\alpha}(A_{m,S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}}}^{{\mathrm{LN}}},B_{m,S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}}}^{{\mathrm{Bern}}})-R_{\alpha}(\widehat{A}_{m,S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}}}^{{\mathrm{LN}}},\widehat{B}_{m,S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}}}^{{\mathrm{Bern}}})-R_{\alpha}(\widehat{A}_{m,(S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}})^c}^{{\mathrm{LN}}},\widehat{B}_{m,(S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}})^c}^{{\mathrm{Bern}}})\\
\leq &R_{\alpha}(\Delta_{m,S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}}}^A,\Delta_{m,S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}}}^B)-R_{\alpha}(\Delta^A_{m,S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}c}},\Delta^B_{m,(S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}})^c})\\
=&\|\Delta_{m,S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}},{\mathrm{Bern}}}}\|_R-\|\Delta_{m,(S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}})^c}\|_R
\end{split}$$ Therefore, the R.H.S of is bounded by $\frac{3\lambda}{2}\|\Delta_{m,S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}}}\|_R-\frac{\lambda}{2}\|\Delta_{m,(S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}})^c}\|_R$. Since $L_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}$ and $L_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}$ are both convex, the L.H.S. of is non-negative. Thus $\|\Delta_{m,(S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}})^c}\|_R\leq 3\|\Delta_{m,S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}}}\|_R$. Define set ${\mathcal{C}}(S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}},\kappa)$ of $K\times M\times K$ tensors for any $\kappa>0$ as follows: $$\label{eq:cone_def_q_A}
{\mathcal{C}}(S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}},\kappa)=\{U\in {\mathbb{R}}^{K\times M\times K}: \left\|U_{(S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}})^c}\right\|_{R}\leq \kappa\left\|U_{S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}}}\right\|_{R}\},$$ then $\Delta_m\in {\mathcal{C}}(S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}},3)$.
Now we would like to show the strong convexity of $L_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}$ and $L_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}$ as a function of $\langle A_m, X^t\rangle$ and $\langle B_m,X^t\rangle$. As shown in the proof of Theorem \[thm:cq\], $$\label{eq:stconv1_q_A}
D_{L_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}}(A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}}+\Delta_m^A,A_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}})=\frac{1}{2T}\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}{{{{\mathbbm{1}}}}_{\{X^{t-1}_m\neq 0\}}}\|\langle \Delta_m^A,X^t\rangle\|_2^2.$$ Meanwhile, $\|\Delta_m^B\|_{1,\infty}\leq \|\Delta_m^B\|_{1,2}\leq \frac{\|\Delta_m\|_R}{\sqrt{1-\alpha}}$, thus the strong convexity of $L_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}$ is guaranteed by the following lemma:
\[lem::rsc\_BAR\] Define $\sigma_B\triangleq \frac{e^{-R_{\max}^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}}-1}}{(1+e^{R_{\max}^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}}+1})^2}$, then we have $$D_{L_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}}(B_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}+\Delta_m^B,B_m^{{\mathrm{Bern}}})\geq \frac{\sigma_B}{2T}\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}\langle \Delta^B_m,X^t\rangle^2.$$
The following Lemma provides a lower bound for $$\frac{\alpha}{2T}\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}{{{{\mathbbm{1}}}}_{\{X^{t-1}_m\neq 0\}}}\|\langle \Delta_m^A,X^t\rangle\|_2^2+\frac{(1-\alpha)\sigma_B}{2T}\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}\langle \Delta^B_m,X^t\rangle^2$$ in terms of $\|\Delta_m\|_F^2$.
\[lem:REC\_q\_A\] For any $U\in \mathbb{R}^{K\times M\times K}$, let $U^{(1)}=U_{1:(K-1),:,:}$ and $U^{(2)}=U_{K,:,:}$. There exists a constant $c_1$, such that if $T\geq C_1(\rho^{{\mathrm{LN}},{\mathrm{Bern}}}_m)^2\log M$, $$\inf_{U\in {\mathcal{C}}(S_m^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}},3)\cap B_F(1)}\frac{1}{2T}\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}{{{{\mathbbm{1}}}}_{\{{{\mathbf{X}}}^{t-1}_m\neq 0\}}}\|\langle U^{(1)},X^t\rangle\|_2^2+\frac{\sigma_B}{2T}\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}\langle U^{(2)},X^t\rangle^2\geq c_1,$$ with probability at least $1-\exp\{-c\log M\}$. Here $C_1, c_1>0$ depend only on $R_{\max}^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}}$, $\|\Sigma\|_{\infty}$, $\lambda_{\min}(\Sigma)$, $\|\nu^{{\mathrm{LN}}}\|_{\infty}$, $\|\eta^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}\|_{\infty}$ and $K$.
Therefore, combining , , Lemma \[lem::rsc\_BAR\] and Lemma \[lem:REC\_q\_A\] leads us to $$\begin{split}
\|\Delta_m\|_F^2\leq C_1C(\alpha)\frac{\rho^{{\mathrm{LN}},{\mathrm{Bern}}}_m\log M}{T}, &\quad\|\Delta_m\|_R\leq 4\sqrt{\rho^{{\mathrm{LN}},{\mathrm{Bern}}}_m}\|\Delta_m\|_F\leq C_1C(\alpha)\rho^{{\mathrm{LN}},{\mathrm{Bern}}}_m\sqrt{\frac{\log M}{T}},
\end{split}$$ with probability at least $1-C\exp\{-c\log M\}$. Here $C(\alpha)=\left[C_2\max_k \Sigma_{kk}\alpha+C_3(1-\alpha)\right]^{\frac{1}{2}}$ for some universal constants $C_2, C_3>0$, and $C_1$ depends only on $R_{\max}^{{\mathrm{LN}}, {\mathrm{Bern}}}$, $\|\Sigma\|_{\infty}$, $\lambda_{\min}(\Sigma)$, $\|\nu^{{\mathrm{LN}}}\|_{\infty}$, $\|\eta^{{\mathrm{Bern}}}\|_{\infty}$ and $K$. Taking a union bound over $1\leq m\leq M$ gives us the final result.
Conclusion
==========
In this paper, we develop two procedures that estimate context-dependent networks from point process event data. The first approach is a standard regularized multinomial approach for estimating the influence between pairs of nodes $(m, m')$ and pairs of categories $(k, k')$ given that each event belongs to a particular category. Our second logistic-normal approach builds on ideas from compositional time series and is more nuanced since each event consists of a composition of several different topics. We extend existing compositional time series approaches by accounting for the scenario in which no event occurs in our algorithm; significantly, the logistic-normal distribution leads to a convex objective. Our theoretical guarantees show that we can achieve consistent estimation even when the number of network nodes, $M$, is much larger than the duration of the observation period, $T$.
We validate our network estimation procedures both with synthetic and two real data examples. Both the synthetic and real data examples suggest that the multinomial approach is better suited to nodes or networks where events tend to belong to a single category, whereas the logistic-normal approach is better suited to nodes in which each event tends to have mixed membership.
Acknowledgements {#acknowledgements .unnumbered}
================
LZ, GR, BM, and RW were partially supported by ARO W911NF-17-1-0357, NGA HM0476-17-1-2003. GR was also partially supported by NSF DMS-1811767. RW was also partially supported by NSF DMS-1930049, NSF Awards 0353079, 1447449, 1740707, and 1839338.
[^1]: In this case, all $X^t_m$ are non-zero and constrained in the $(K-1)$-dimensional simplex $\triangle^{K-1}$, so for identifiability we have to take $X^{t}_{:,1:(K-1)}\in \mathbb{R}^{M\times (K-1)}$ instead of $X^t\in \mathbb{R}^{M\times K}$ as the covariate for predicting $X^{t+1}$, and thus assume $A^{{\mathrm{LN}}}\in \mathbb{R}^{M\times (K-1)\times M\times (K-1)}$. The problem would not be too different and the theoretical result still hold true with slight modification.
[^2]: Although Theorem \[thm:q\_A\] is only stated for $0\leq\alpha<1$, our proof also leads to the same estimation error bound if $\alpha=1$, for $T\geq C_1(\rho^{{\mathrm{LN}},{\mathrm{Bern}}})^2\log M$ instead of $T\geq \frac{C_1}{1-\alpha}(\rho^{{\mathrm{LN}},{\mathrm{Bern}}})^2\log M$.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We have measured the differential conductance $dI/dV$ of individual multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWNT) of different lengths. A cross-over from wire-like (long tubes) to dot-like (short tubes) behavior is observed. $dI/dV$ is dominated by random conductance fluctuations (UCF) in long MWNT devices , while Coulomb blockade and energy level quantization are observed in short ones . The electron levels of short MWNT dots are nearly four-fold degenerate (including spin) and their evolution in magnetic field (Zeeman splitting) agrees with a $g$-factor of $2$. In zero magnetic field the sequential filling of states evolves with spin $S$ according to $S=0\rightarrow 1/2\rightarrow 0 \dots$. In addition, a Kondo enhancement of the conductance is observed when the number of electrons on the tube is odd.'
author:
- 'M. R. Buitelaar'
- 'A. Bachtold'
- 'T. Nussbaumer'
- 'M. Iqbal'
- 'C. Sch[ö]{}nenberger'
title: 'Multi-wall carbon nanotubes as quantum dots'
---
Carbon nanotubes (NTs) are excellent model systems to study the electronic properties of low-dimensional conductors [@Schoenenberger1]. Transport and scanning probe measurements on metallic single-wall nanotubes (SWNT, diameter ) have revealed that these are one-dimensional conductors ($1$D) with long mean free paths, [@Tans; @Bockrath; @Bachtold1]. In contrast, multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWNT, outer diameter [@SpringerReview], which are composed of a set of coaxial NTs, were found to be disordered. The transport regime varied from $2$D-diffusive in some MWNTs [@Langer; @Bachtold2], to quasi-ballistic in others [@Schoenenberger2]. Most SWNT devices, even very long ones with lengths , have displayed single-electron tunneling effects [@Kouwenhoven1] with conventional Coulomb blockade oscillations and a quantization of the electron states (particle-in-a-box) at [@Tans; @Bockrath]. This demonstrates that the SWNTs were only weakly coupled to the leads in these experiments. The very fact that transport occurs through discrete electron states implies that the corresponding molecular orbitals are phase-coherent and extend over long distances, a remarkable result for a $1$D electron system. Very recently, highly transparent contacts to SWNTs could be realized [@Liang]. The physics of these systems proved to be very rich and ranges from devices dominated by higher-order co-tunneling processes (like e.g. the Kondo effect) at intermediate contact transparencies $T\sim
0.1-0.5$ [@Nygard] to open ballistic systems with transparencies approaching unity [@Liang].
While there are many examples of SWNT quantum dots, little effort has been gone into the investigation of MWNTs as such systems. Given the larger size, the corresponding smaller energy scales and, most notably, the intrinsic scattering, it is not obvious that these experiments will lead to the same results. As we will show below it turns out that in many respects they do. Since the level spacing $\delta E$ scales inversely with length, quantum dot features will be most pronounced in short devices. We have therefore studied MWNTs with short inter-electrode spacing We report here measurements of one such device which showed pronounced quantum dot features. For comparison we have also investigated the linear-response conductance of a very long MWNT .
![\[Fig1\] Linear response conductance $G$ as a function of gate voltage $V_g$ (backgate) at temperatures between and for a MWNT with contacts separated by . Lower left inset: the corresponding root-mean square $\delta G_{rms}$ of the conductance fluctuations $\delta G=G-\langle G\rangle$. Lower right inset: as a reference, $\delta G_{rms}$ of a very long MWNT device with inter-electrode spacing of . The temperature dependence obeys $\delta G_{rms} \propto T^{-1/2}$ (dashed line). ](Fig1.eps){width="120mm"}
Figure \[Fig1\] shows the dependence of the conduction $G$ of a long MWNT device as a function of gate voltage (backgate). Details on device fabrication can be found in Ref. [@Schoenenberger2]. Large and reproducible fluctuations of order $e^2/h$ develop in $G$. Note, that the average conductance is quite large, i.e. , and nearly temperature independent. The root-mean square $\delta G_{rms}$ of the conductance fluctuations $\delta G=G-\langle G\rangle$ is displayed in the lower left inset as a function of temperature $T$. For disordered wires random variations of $G$ as a function of magnetic field or Fermi energy (which is changed here by the gate) are usually assigned to universal conductance fluctuations (UCF). These fluctuations depend on the specific scattering potential but are universal in the sense that their amplitude at [*zero*]{} temperature is of order $e^2/h$, regardless of the sample size and degree of disorder. At finite temperature, self-averaging reduces $\delta G_{rms}$. For a wire which is $1$D with respect to the phase-coherence length $l_{\phi}$ it is given by: $\delta G_{rms}
= \sqrt{12}(e^2/h)(l_{\phi}/L)^{3/2}$, where $L\gg l_{\phi}$ is the wire length [@Lee]. When $l_{\phi}$ becomes of the order of $L$, there is a cross-over to the universal value, $\delta
G_{rms} = 0.73e^2/h$ [@Lee]. The cross-over appears in the measurement at and $\delta G_{rms}$ $\approx
0.6e^2/h$ at , in good agreement with theory. At this temperature the average conductance amounts to $2.8e^2/h$. The saturation of $\delta G_{rms}$ close to the universal limit suggests conduction through one phase coherent unit. This in turns implies that .
As a comparison, we also show $\delta G_{rms}(T)$ of a long MWNT with in the lower right inset of Fig. \[Fig1\] For this long nanotube device, $l_{\phi}/L\ll 1$, which is reflected in the much smaller amplitude of $\delta G_{rms}$. $\delta G_{rms}=0.03e^2/h$ at $T_0$ corresponds to . This is consistent with the estimate of $l_{\phi}$ for the short MWNT and also agrees with $l_{\phi}$ deduced from magneto-conductance experiments of other MWNT samples [@Schoenenberger2]. The dephasing mechanism can be determined from the measured temperature dependence of $l_{\phi}$ . Since $\delta G_{rms}$ follows a power-law in $T$ over more than one decade with an exponent close to $-1/2$ (line in the lower right inset of Fig. \[Fig1\]), $l_{\phi}(T) \propto T^{-1/3}$. This is the behavior expected for a quasi-$1$D conductor. The main contribution to phase-breaking is caused by electron-electron collisions with small energy transfers, a process known as Nyquist dephasing [@Altshuler].
In terms of $l_{\phi}$ the long NT is a wire, whereas the short one is a dot for which Coulomb blockade (CB) may be important. We now estimate the single-electron charging energy $U_C=e^2/C$ [@convenience] for the latter and compare it with the base measuring temperature . The dominant contribution to the electrostatic capacitance $C$ of short MWNTs is due to the contacts, leading to (see below). Hence, , i.e. $U_C/kT_0\sim 17$, and CB is therefore expected. This, however, does not seem to be the case: firstly, the average conductance $\langle G \rangle$ is nearly temperature independent (also over a larger temperature range than shown in the graph); secondly, the conductance is large $\langle G \rangle=2.8e^2/h$; and thirdly, $G$ lacks the periodicity in gate voltage expected for a weakly coupled quantum dot. We attribute the absence of clear CB features to a large contact transparency. With increasing gate voltage from $0$ to , however, the average conductance decreases from $2.8e^2/h$ to $\sim 2e^2/h$, possibly reflecting a decreasing contact transparency. This assumption is supported by the following measurement which displays clear Coulomb blockade features in the large gate-voltage regime.
![\[Fig2\] Greyscale representation of the differential conductance as a function of source-drain ($V_{sd}$) and gate voltage ($V_g$) at (lighter = more conductive). The average 2-terminal conductance is high ($ \sim 2e^2/h$), nevertheless clear traces of Coulomb blockade are observed. The pattern of a large ‘diamond’ followed by $3$ smaller ones suggest a (nearly) $4$-fold degeneracy (including spin) of the single-electron dot states. $\Delta E_{add}$, $U_C$, and $\delta E$ denote the addition energy, the charging energy $U_C=e^2/C$, and the single-electron level spacing, respectively.](Fig2.eps){width="100mm"}
Fig. \[Fig2\] shows a grey-scale representation of $dI/dV$ versus gate voltage $V_g$ (horizontal) and transport voltage $V_{sd}$ (vertical) in the regime . Although the overall two terminal conductance is still large, i.e. $G\sim 2e^2/h$, the ‘remainders’ of CB are clearly visible. The most striking observation is a sequence of a large low-conduction CB ‘diamond’ followed by $3$ smaller ones (best seen on the left). The diamonds are highlighted by dashed lines in the figure. The size of the CB-diamonds reflects the magnitude of the addition energy $\Delta E_{add}$, which measures the difference in chemical potential of two adjacent charge states of the dot [@Kouwenhoven1]. In the constant interaction model (C independent of $N$) $\Delta E_{add}=U_C+\delta E$. If all the single-electron levels would repel each other (only 2-fold spin degeneracy) and $\delta E\sim U_C$, an alternating sequence of small and large CB diamonds would be expected. Staring from an even filling number, $\Delta E_{add}=U_C+\delta E$ for the first added electron (large diamond) and to $U_C$ for the second one (small diamond) [@Nygard]. The sequence of one large diamond, followed by three smaller ones of approximate equal size, which is observed here, suggests that the degeneracy of the states is not $2$, but rather $4$ (including spin). From the size of the diamonds we obtain and , the latter corresponding to . The total capacitance $C$ is the sum of the gate capacitance $C_g$ and the contact capacitances $C_l$ (left) and $C_r$ (right). All three parameters can be deduced from the diamonds. We obtain: and .
The level spacing $\delta E$ of an ideal metallic SWNT is given by $\delta E=hv_F/2L$, where $v_F$ is the Fermi velocity [@SpringerReview; @Dresselhaus]. This holds for an undoped NT. Recently, it has been found that MWNTs are substantially hole-doped by the environment [@Krueger]. As a consequence more than the ideally expected $2$ modes participate in transport. Hence, $\delta E=hv_F/ML$, where $M>2$ is the number of $1$D subbands. Taking [@Fermivelocity], the measured value of corresponds to $M\approx 14$, in good agreement with Krüger [*et al.*]{} [@Krueger]. An estimate of the lifetime broadening $\Gamma$ can be obtained from the measured width of the Coulomb peaks and yields .
The observed $4$-fold degeneracy can be explained by a specific property of the graphite sheet (graphene). In the simplest tight-binding band-structure calculation all $1$D-bands are twofold degenerate (not including spin) [@Dresselhaus]. This degeneracy can be traced back to the presence of two C-atoms per unit cell, each contributing with one valence orbital. This, so-called -degeneracy has not been observed before, although it is supposed to be a [*generic*]{} feature of graphene.
![\[Fig3\] (a) Linear-response conductance $G$ as a function of gate voltage $V_g$ for different magnetic fields (vertically offset for clarity). The evolution of the conductance peaks are highlighted by dashed lines. (b) Peak positions versus . Curves are guides to the eye and LC denotes level-crossings. (c) Magnetic field dependence of the addition energy $\delta E_{pair}$ deduced from the separation of adjacent peaks involving electrons on the same orbital (the pairs $1\leftrightarrow 2$ $3\leftrightarrow 4$, $5\leftrightarrow 6$, and $7\leftrightarrow 8$). The dashed line (least-square fit) corresponds to the Zeeman energy with Land$\acute{e}$ factor $g=2.1$.](Fig3.eps){width="130mm"}
To explore this scenario further we have also studied the gate-voltage shifts of the linear-response conductance peaks as a function of a perpendicular magnetic field $B$, Fig. \[Fig3\]. The difference between the positions of adjacent peaks can also be related to the addition energy: $\Delta V_g=C\Delta
E_{add}/eC_g$. Figure \[Fig3\]a shows the evolution in small magnetic field . Adjacent peaks are seen to shift in opposite directions. This is the behavior of a ground-state whose spin alternates as $S=0\rightarrow 1/2\rightarrow 0\cdots$. This, however, contradicts the assumed $4$-fold degeneracy for the following reason: In the presence of a magnetic field the energy of an electron depends on its spin due to the Zeeman effect which lowers the degeneracy from $4$ to $2$ (only Zeeman energy assumed). For $N=2$, the two electrons are thus expected to occupy different orbitals with [*parallel*]{} spins. Actually, this would already be expected for $B=0$, because of exchange-correlation (Hund’s rule would favour the spin-triplet with total angular momentum $S=1$) [@Tarucha]. The spin should therefore evolve as $S=1/2\rightarrow
1$ for $N=1\rightarrow 2$. Experimentally, however, the first $2$ electrons have opposite spins and are thus added to the same obital state. This discrepancy can only be resolved, if the assumed $4$-fold degeneracy is not ‘exact’, i.e. there are pairs of states which lie close together with spacing $\delta
E^{\star}$. The pairs themselves are spaced by $\delta E > \delta E^{\star}$. A detailed study of the peak evolutions (Fig. \[Fig3\]b) reveals that this is indeed the case. $\Delta E_{add}$ at $B=0$ of the $2\rightarrow 3$ ($6\rightarrow 7$) transition is clearly larger than the $1\rightarrow 2$ and $3\rightarrow 4$ ($5\rightarrow 6$ and $7\rightarrow 8$) ones. We obtain and , on average . We have also verified that the energy shifts agree with the Zeeman term for electrons occupying the same orbital. We plot in Fig. \[Fig3\]c the corresponding addition energies as a function of $B$. A best fit of the data to $U_C + g{\mu}_B B/e$ , where $\mu_B$ is the Bohr magneton and $g$ the Land$\acute{e}$ factor, is shown as a dashed line and yields $g=2.1\,\pm\,0.3$. This value is consistent with $g= 2.0$ for graphite and with previous measurements of $g$ for a SWNT [@Tans; @Cobden].
In high magnetic field levels cross. Two crossings (LCs) are seen in Fig. \[Fig3\]b. At , for example, the spin-up of the first orbital crosses the spin-down of the second, giving rise to an $S=0\rightarrow 1$ transition. A similar crossing is not seen in the upper part. On the one hand, this is due to the larger $\delta E^{\star}$. On the other hand, there is also a magnetic-field dependence of the orbitals which increases $\delta E^{\star}$ at higher fields.
We find a pattern that repeats every $4$th electron due to an apparent [*pairing*]{} of orbital states. We believe that this pairing is related to the $K-K^{\prime}$-degeneracy. The splitting $\delta E^{\star}$ is proposed to be caused by hybridization via the contacts, which are strongly coupled to the NT. We expect a level ‘repulsion’, in size comparable to the life-time broadening, which we estimated to be . This is in fair agreement with . In high magnetic field the intrinsic $K-K^{\prime}$-degeneracy should be lifted which enhances the level separation further. This may explain why the $S=0\rightarrow 1$ transition is not observed for the upper quartet in Fig. \[Fig3\]b. Finally, the fact that $S=0$ for $N=2$ at $B=0$ is only consistent with Hund’s rule if the exchange energy $E_{X} < \delta E^{\star}$, yielding an upper bound for $E_X$ of .
![\[Fig4\] (a) Greyscale representation of $dI/dV$ as a function of source-drain ($V_{sd}$) and gate voltage ($V_g$) at (lighter = more conductive). Within regions marked as $O$ ($E$) the number of electrons on the tube is odd (even). The horizontal features (best seen in outer right diamond) are caused by the Kondo effect. (b) Temperature dependence of the linear-response conductance. The arrows indicate directions of decreasing temperature. []{data-label="fig4"}](Fig4.eps){width="90mm"}
Another interesting manifestation of the electron spin on the electronic transport can be seen in the gate region between $15.5$ and . We have measured this part with improved accuracy and it is shown in Fig. \[Fig4\]. Fig. \[Fig4\]b shows the linear-response conductance. In the valleys marked as $E$ (even filling) the conduction decreases with decreasing temperature while it increases in the valleys marked as $O$ (odd filling). Contrary to what one might expect from normal CB, a high conduction ‘ridge’ around develops in the latter (best seen in the right most diamond). These observations can be understood with the Kondo model [@Kouwenhoven2; @Nygard; @Goldhaber]. When the number of electrons on the tube is odd and the coupling to the leads is sufficiently strong a spin singlet can form between the spin polarized tube and electrons in the leads. This results in a resonance in the density-of-states at the Fermi energy (i.e. the Kondo resonance). The width of the Kondo resonance reflects the binding energy of the singlet which is usually described by a Kondo temperature $T_K$. The conductance is expected to increase logarithmically with decreasing temperature in the centers of the ridges below $T_K$. Following $G$ as a function of temperature at we indeed find a logarithmic dependence between and . At temperatures well below $T_K$ the conductance is expected to saturate at a maximum value of $2e^2/h$. This is called the unitary limit. In our case, however, no saturation has been observed down to .
The Kondo effect is expected to be suppressed by a small bias voltage across the tube of the order of $\pm k_B T_K /e$. The ridge at $V_g = 16.2$ V has a width of $\sim$ 0.2 meV which would correspond to $T_K$ = 1.2 K (see curve in Fig. \[Fig4\]a). This is roughly in agreement with the onset of the logarithmic increase of $G$ below $\sim$ 1 K. An additional prediction is the disappearance of the Kondo resonance in a magnetic field. The high conductance ridge indeed broadens and disappears above . Simultaneously, the Coulomb blockade diamonds are recovered.
We acknowledge W. Belzig, G. Burkard, D. Cobden, R. Egger and J. Nygård for discussions. We thank L. Forró for the MWNT material and J. Gobrecht for providing the oxidized Si substrates. This work has been supported by the Swiss NFS.
[99]{}
For reviews, see: C. Dekker, Physics Today [**52**]{} (5), p22-28 (1999); C. Schönenberger and L. Forró, Physics World, June 2001, p37-41.
S. J. Tans [*et al*]{}, Nature [**386**]{},474 (1997).
M. Bockrath [*et al*]{}. Science [**275**]{}, 1992 (1997).
A. Bachtold [*et al*]{}., Phys. Rev. Lett. [**84**]{}, 6082 (2000).
L. Forró and C. Schönenberger in [*Carbon Nanotubes*]{}, edited by M.S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus and Ph. Avouris, Topics in Applied Physics, Vol.80 (Springer 2001).
L. Langer [*et al*]{}., Phys. Rev. Lett. [**76**]{}, 479 (1996).
A. Bachtold [*et al*]{}., Nature [**397**]{}, 673 (1999).
C. Schönenberger, A. Bachtold, C. Strunk, J.-P. Salvetat and Forró, Appl. Phys. A [**69**]{}, 283 (1999).
L.P. Kouwenhoven [*et al*]{}., in [*Mesoscopic Electron Transport,*]{} edited by L.P. Kouwenhoven, G. Schön, and L.L. Sohn (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997).
W. Liang [*et al*]{}., Nature [**411**]{}, 665 (2001).
J. Nygård, D.H. Cobden, and P. E. Lindelof, Nature [**408**]{}, 342 (2000).
P.A. Lee, A.D. Stone, and H. Fukuyama, Phys. Rev. B [**35**]{}, 1039 (1987); P.A. Lee and A.D. Stone, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**55**]{}, 1622 (1985).
B. L. Altshuler, A. G. Aronov, and D. E. Khmelnitsky, J. Phys. C [**15**]{}, 7367 (1982).
For convenience we use $U_C=e^2/C$ instead of $E_C=e^2/2C$.
See e.g., M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, P. C. Eklund: [*Science of Fullerenes and Carbon Nanotubes*]{} (Academic Press, New York 1996).
M. Krüger, M. Buitelaar, T. Nussbaumer, and C. Schönenberger, Appl. Phys. Lett. [**78**]{},1291 (2001).
The Fermi velocity of $8 \cdot 10^5$ m/s is an upper limit since the average $v_F$ might be lower for a system doped into several subbands.
S. Tarucha, D.G. Austing, Y. Tokura, W.G. van der Wiel, and L.P. Kouwenhoven, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**84**]{}, 2485 (2000).
For a review see: L. Kouwenhoven and L. Glazman in Physics World, January 2001, p.33-38.
D. Goldhaber-Gorden [*et al*]{}., Nature [**391**]{}, 156 (1998).
D. H. Cobden, M. Bockrath, P.L. McEuen, A.G. Rinzler, and R.E. Smalley, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**81**]{}, 681 (1998).
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'The (light but not-so-light) strange quark may play a special role in the low-energy dynamics of QCD. The presence of strange quark pairs in the sea may have a significant impact of the pattern of chiral symmetry breaking : in particular large differences can occur between the chiral limits of two and three massless flavours (i.e., whether $m_s$ is kept at its physical value or sent to zero). This may induce problems of convergence in three-flavour chiral expansions. To cope with such difficulties, we introduce a new framework, called Resummed Chiral Perturbation Theory. We exploit it to analyse $\pi\pi$ and $\pi K$ scatterings and match them with dispersive results in a frequentist framework. Constraints on three-flavour chiral order parameters are derived.'
address: |
Laboratoire de Physique Théorique,\
CNRS/Univ. Paris-Sud 11 (UMR 8627), 91405 Orsay Cedex, France
author:
- 'Sébastien Descotes-Genon'
title: '$\pi\pi$ and $\pi K$ scatterings in three-flavour resummed chiral perturbation theory'
---
Two chiral limits of interest {#sec:msdep}
=============================
Because of its intermediate mass, the strange quark has a special status in low-energy QCD. It is light enough to allow for a combined expansion of observables in powers of $m_u,m_d,m_s$ around the $N_f=3$ chiral limit (meaning 3 massless flavours): $m_u=m_d=m_s=0$. But it is sufficiently heavy to induce significant changes from the $N_f=3$ limit to the $N_f=2$ limit: $m_u=m_d=0$ and $m_s$ physical. Each limit can engender its own version of Chiral Perturbation Theory ($\chi$PT). In the $N_f=2$ limit, the pions are the only degrees of freedom, whereas $N_f=3$ $\chi$PT deals with pions, kaons and $\eta$. This second version of $\chi$PT is richer, discusses more processes in a larger range of energy, but contains more unknown low-energy constants (LECs) and may have a slower convergence. The details of the connection between the two theories remain under debate.
Indeed, due to $\bar{s}s$ sea-pairs, order parameters such as the quark condensate and the pseudoscalar decay constant, $\Sigma(N_f)=-\lim_{N_f} \langle\bar{u}u\rangle$ and $F^2(N_f)=\lim_{N_f} F^2_\pi$, can reach significantly different values in the two chiral limits ($\lim_{N_f}$ denoting the chiral limit with $N_f$ massless flavours) [@param]. An illustation is provided by the quark condensate: $$\begin{aligned}
\Sigma(2)&=&\Sigma(2;m_s)=\Sigma(2;0)
+ m_s \frac{\partial\Sigma(2;m_s)}{\partial m_s} + O(m_s^2)\\
&=&\Sigma(3)
+ m_s \lim_{m_u,m_d\to 0}
i\int d^4x\ \langle 0|\bar{u}u(x)\, \bar{s}s(0) |0\rangle + O(m_s^2) \label{eq:sigma}\end{aligned}$$ Here, $\bar{s}s$-pairs are involved through the two-point correlator $\langle (\bar{u}u) (\bar{s}s)\rangle$, which violates the Zweig rule in the vacuum (scalar) channel. One expects [@param] that this effect should suppress order parameters when $m_s\to 0$: $\Sigma(2) \geq \Sigma(3)$ and $F^2(2) \geq F^2(3)$. Since the quark condensate(s) and the pseudoscalar decay constant(s) are the leading-order LECs for the two versions of $\chi$PT, a strong decrease from $N_f=2$ to $3$ would have an impact on the structure of the two theories.
Two- and three-flavour chiral expansions
========================================
A few years ago, the E865 collaboration provided new data on $K_{\ell 4}$ decays [@E865]. Building upon the dispersive analysis of $\pi\pi$ scattering [@royeq], we extracted the two-flavour order parameters [@pipi]: $$X(2)=(m_u+m_d)\Sigma(2)/(F_\pi^2M_\pi^2)=0.81\pm 0.07 \qquad
Z(2)=F^2(2)/F_\pi^2=0.89\pm 0.03$$ A different analysis, with an additional theoretical input from the scalar radius of the pion, led to an even larger value for $X(2)$ [@CGL]. The situation is somewhat modified by new data from the NA48 collaboration [@NA48], which show some discrepancy with the E865 phase shifts in the higher end of the allowed phase space. The role of isospin breaking corrections is under discussion currrently. The preliminary values of the phase shifts [@NA48] tend to increase the value of the $I=J=0$ $\pi\pi$ scattering length, and to decrease the value of the two-flavour quark condensate, pushing $X(2)$ down to 0.7. In any case, one would expect values closer to 1, since $X(2)$ and $Z(2)$ monitor the convergence of $N_f=2$ chiral expansions of $F_\pi^2 M_\pi^2$ and $F_\pi^2$ respectively. Such expansions in powers of $m_u$ and $m_d$ *only* should exhibit smaller NLO corrections (below 10%) [@pipi].
To include $K$- and $\eta$-mesons dynamically, one must use three-flavour $\chi$PT around the $N_f=3$ chiral limit. Strange sea-quark loops may affect chiral series by damping the leading-order (LO) term, which depends on $F^2(3)$ and $\Sigma(3)$, and by enhancing next-to-leading-order (NLO) corrections, in particular when violating the Zweig rule in the scalar sector. Take for instance: $$\label{eq:fpi}
F_\pi^2 = F(3)^2 + 16(m_s+2m)B_0 \Delta L_4+ 16mB_0\Delta L_5 +O(m_q^2)$$ where $B_0=-\lim_{m_u,m_d,m_s\to 0} \langle\bar{u}u\rangle/F_\pi^2$, and we have put together NLO low-energy constants and chiral logarithms $\Delta L_5=L_5(M_\rho)+0.67\cdot 10^{-3}$, $\Delta L_4=L_4(M_\rho)+0.51\cdot 10^{-3}$ (enhanced by $m_s$). If we assume that the LO contribution is numerically dominant (i.e., $F_\pi^2 = F(3)^2$ to a very good approximation), we can perform the following manipulations: $$\label{eq:fpinum}
\frac{F(3)^2}{F_\pi^2}=\frac{F^2(3)}{F^2(3)+O(m_q^2)}
= 1- 8\frac{2M_K^2+M_\pi^2}{F_\pi^2}\Delta L_4
- 8\frac{M_\pi^2}{F_\pi^2}\Delta L_5 + O(m_q^2)
=1- 0.51 -0.04 + O(m_q^2)$$ where we have used $1/(1+x)=1-x$ and eq. (\[eq:fpi\]) at the second step, and the second and third terms of the last equality are obtained using $L_4(M_\rho)=0.5\cdot 10^{-3}$ and $L_5(M_\rho)=1.4\cdot 10^{-3}$ respectively [@pika]. This is clearly in contradiction with the orginal assumption $F_\pi^2 \simeq F(3)^2$. The available dispersive estimates of $L_6$ [@uuss] yield a similar situation for $F_\pi^2M_\pi^2$ cite[resum]{}. Therefore, a small positive value of $L_4(M_\rho)$ or $L_6(M_\rho)$ is enough to spoil the rapid convergence of $N_f=3$ chiral series and to induce a numerical competition between formal LO and NLO contributions.
![Profiles for the confidence levels of $r=m_s/m$ (left) and $X(3)=2m\Sigma(3)/(F_\pi^2M_\pi^2)$ (right). In each case, the results are obtained from $\pi\pi$ scattering only (dashed line), $\pi K$ scattering only (dotted line), or both sources of information (solid line).[]{data-label="fig:CLs"}](pr-1-col "fig:"){height="5.6cm"} ![Profiles for the confidence levels of $r=m_s/m$ (left) and $X(3)=2m\Sigma(3)/(F_\pi^2M_\pi^2)$ (right). In each case, the results are obtained from $\pi\pi$ scattering only (dashed line), $\pi K$ scattering only (dotted line), or both sources of information (solid line).[]{data-label="fig:CLs"}](px-1-col "fig:"){height="5.6cm"}
Constraints from $\pi\pi$ and $\pi K$ scatterings
=================================================
The potentially “large” values of $L_4$ and $L_6$ lead to a numerical competition between formal LO and NLO contributions in chiral series. To deal with such a situation, we have introduced a framework, called Resummed Chiral Perturbation Theory (Re$\chi$PT) [@rechpt], where we define the appropriate observables to consider and the treatment of their chiral expansion [@rechpt; @resum]. It allows for a a resummation of the potentially large effect of the Zweig-rule violating couplings $L_4$ and $L_6$ [@rechpt; @resum]. Since this framework copes with the possibility of a numerical competition between (formal) LO and NLO terms in chiral series, some usual $O(p^4)$ results are not valid any longer: for instance $r=m_s/m$ is not fixed by $M_K^2/M_\pi^2$ and may vary from 8 to 40.
One can apply this framework to $\pi\pi$ and $\pi K$ scatterings, which provide information on $N_f=2$ and $N_f=3$ patterns of chiral symmetry breaking respectively, and in particular on $r=m_s/m$, the quark condensate $X(3)=2m\Sigma(3)/(F_\pi^2M_\pi^2)$ and the decay constant $Z(3)=F^2(3)/F_\pi^2$. One can exploit dispersive relations, such as Roy equations [@royeq] and Roy-Steiner equations [@pika], to reconstruct the amplitudes from the phase shifts from threshold up to energies around 1 GeV. Matching the dispersive and chiral representations of the amplitude in a frequentist framework provides constraints (in terms of confidence levels) on the main parameters of interest for three-flavour $\chi$PT [@rechpt]. Fig. \[fig:CLs\] shows the situation for $r=m_s/m$ and $X(3)=2m\Sigma(3)/(F_\pi^2M_\pi^2)$.
The main impact of $\pi\pi$ scattering consists in constraining $r=m_s/m$: indeed, $\pi\pi$ scattering pins down the two-flavour condensate $X(2)$ rather accurately, which can be related to $r$ through the spectrum of pseudoscalar mesons [@param; @resum]. The combination of $\pi\pi$ and $\pi K$ scatterings yields: $$r \geq 14.8\,, \quad X(3)\leq 0.83\,, \quad Y(3)\leq 1.1\,,
\quad 0.18 \leq Z(3)\leq 1\,. \qquad [68 \% {\rm CL}]$$
Conclusion
==========
The presence of massive $s\bar{s}$-pairs in the QCD vacuum may induce significant differences in the pattern of chiral symmetry breaking between the $N_f=2$ and $N_f=3$ chiral limits. This effect, related to the violation of the Zweig rule in the scalar sector, may spoil the convergence of three-flavour chiral expansions. We introduce Resummed Chiral Perturbation Theory to deal with such a problem, and apply it to our experimental knowledge on $\pi\pi$ and $\pi K$ scatterings. The outcome does not favour the usual picture of a large quark condensation independent of the number of massless flavours. Further experimental information is needed to constrain the pattern of chiral symmetry breaking efficiently and learn more about its variation with $N_f$.
Work supported in part by the EU Contract No. MRTN-CT-2006-035482, FLAVIAnet”.
[99]{}
S. Descotes-Genon, L. Girlanda and J. Stern, JHEP 0001 (2000) 041. S. Pislak [*et al.*]{}, Phys. Rev. D [**67**]{} (2003) 072004. B. Ananthanarayan, G. Colangelo, J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Phys. Rept. [**353**]{} (2001) 207. S. Descotes-Genon, N. Fuchs, L. Girlanda and J. Stern, Eur. Phys. J. C 24 (2002) 469. G. Colangelo, J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 5008. G. Lamanna, *$\pi\pi$ scattering from $K_{e4}$ decays*, talk at this conference.
P. Buettiker, S. Descotes-Genon and B. Moussallam, Eur. Phys. J. C 33 (2004) 409. S. Descotes-Genon, N. Fuchs, L. Girlanda and J. Stern, Eur. Phys. J. C 34 (2004) 201. B. Moussallam, Eur. Phys. J. C 14 (2000) 111; JHEP 0008 (2000) 005. S. Descotes-Genon, JHEP 0103 (2001) 002. S. Descotes-Genon, accepted for publication in Eur. Phys. J. C, arXiv:hep-ph/0703154.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'With a complete, mass-selected sample of quiescent galaxies from the NEWFIRM Medium-Band Survey (NMBS), we study the stellar populations of the oldest and most massive galaxies ($>$10$^{11}$ M$_{\odot}$) to high redshift. The sample includes 570 quiescent galaxies selected based on their extinction-corrected $U$-$V$ colors out to $z$=2.2, with accurate photometric redshifts, $\sigma_{z}$/(1+$z$)$\sim$2%, and rest-frame colors, $\sigma_{\mathrm{U-V}}\!\sim$0.06 mag. We measure an increase in the intrinsic scatter of the rest-frame $U$-$V$ colors of quiescent galaxies with redshift. This scatter in color arises from the spread in ages of the quiescent galaxies, where we see both relatively quiescent red, old galaxies and quiescent blue, younger galaxies towards higher redshift. The trends between color and age are consistent with the observed composite rest-frame spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of these galaxies. The composite SEDs of the reddest and bluest quiescent galaxies are fundamentally different, with remarkably well-defined 4000$\mathrm{\AA}$- and Balmer-breaks, respectively. Some of the quiescent galaxies may be up to 4 times older than the average age- and up to the age of the universe, if the assumption of solar metallicity is correct. By matching the scatter predicted by models that include growth of the red sequence by the transformation of blue galaxies to the observed intrinsic scatter, the data indicate that most early-type galaxies formed their stars at high redshift with a burst of star formation prior to migrating to the red sequence. The observed $U$-$V$ color evolution with redshift is weaker than passive evolution predicts; possible mechanisms to slow the color evolution include increasing amounts of dust in quiescent galaxies towards higher redshift, red mergers at $z\!\lesssim$1, and a frosting of relatively young stars from star formation at later times.'
author:
- 'Katherine E. Whitaker, Pieter G. van Dokkum, Gabriel Brammer, Mariska Kriek, Marijn Franx, Ivo Labbé, Danilo Marchesini, Ryan F. Quadri, Rachel Bezanson, Garth D. Illingworth, Kyoung-Soo Lee, Adam Muzzin, Gregory Rudnick, David A. Wake'
bibliography:
- 'AgeSpreadref.bib'
title: 'The Age Spread of Quiescent Galaxies with the NEWFIRM Medium-band Survey: Identification of the Oldest Galaxies out to $z\!\sim$2'
---
Introduction
============
Massive galaxies with strongly suppressed star formation exist out to and beyond a redshift of $z\sim2$ [e.g. @Labbe05; @Daddi05; @Kriek06; @Kriek09; @Fontana09], and these red, quiescent galaxies form well-defined color-mass and color-magnitude relations (CMR), known as the red sequence [e.g. @Kriek08]. The scatter in the color of red sequence galaxies provides a natural marker for the variation in star formation histories. Galaxies with stellar populations that formed at different epochs will have an intrinsic scatter in their colors, and this scatter will decrease as these red sequence galaxies evolve.
In simple models, the scatter in the observed color of red sequence galaxies increases with redshift as the fractional age differences between the galaxies becomes larger [@Bower92; @Ellis97; @vanDokkum98]. In more complex models that include morphological transformations, the scatter can be constant or even decrease with redshift [@vanDokkum01; @Romeo08]. Directly probing the scatter in color (as well as the scatter in age) as a function of redshift will constrain these models.
The intrinsic scatter in the $U$-$V$ colors of local early-type galaxies in the Coma Cluster is $\sim$0.03 mag [@Bower92]. Most of the work at higher redshifts has been done only in clusters, finding a roughly constant internal $U$-$V$ scatter of $\sim\!0.08\pm0.03$ mag at $0.05<z<0.8$, increasing to $\sim\!0.15$ at $z$=1.6 [@vanDokkum00; @Holden04; @McIntosh05a; @Lidman08; @Mei09; @Ruhland09; @Hilton09; @Papovich10]. To date, there are no measurements of the intrinsic scatter in the CMR for field galaxies at $z\!\gtrsim$1, because this requires accurate rest-frame colors and methods of separating star-forming and quiescent galaxies.
At high redshift, the color-mass relation is “diluted” by dusty star-forming galaxies, and the dust complicates the measurements of the intrinsic color scatter of red, old galaxies. This complication is less important at low redshift because $\sim\!$70-80% of red galaxies have very little dust [@Bell04a; @Wolf05]. Furthermore, dusty contaminants can be visually identified using morphological information out to $z\!\sim$1 [e.g. @McIntosh05b; @Ruhland09], whereas at higher redshifts the galaxies are too faint to resolve with current technology. However, these dusty systems can be identified using additional information: e.g. $UVJ$ rest-frame colors [@Williams09], the visual dust extinction from SED modeling [@Brammer09], or mid-IR imaging [@Papovich05; @Franx08; @Fontana09].
Currently the best estimates for the ages of stellar populations in massive high redshift galaxies comes from @Kriek08, who combine broadband multiwavelength imaging with NIR spectroscopy for a $K$-selected sample. They find that red sequence galaxies at $z\!\sim$2.3 typically have 0.5-1 Gyr populations with moderate amounts of dust. However, older galaxies may have been missed due to the magnitude limits of the $K$-selection. To understand the properties of quiescent galaxies, a large systematic study is required to connect and confirm the limited knowledge we have of galaxies at $z\!\sim$2 with the observed properties of local early-type galaxies.
High redshift studies of galaxies are either based on small, accurate spectroscopic samples that are biased due to the methods of selection, or large photometric samples limited by the accuracy of the photometric redshifts and depth of the survey. To address the problems associated with each method, the NEWFIRM Medium-Band Survey [NMBS, @vanDokkum09a] was designed to improve the photometric redshift accuracies while maintaining a large sample of galaxies. For the first time, we are able to determine the color scatter of galaxies on the red sequence for a complete, mass-selected sample with accurate photometric redshifts.
In this paper, we study the properties of a mass-selected sample of galaxies from the NMBS over four redshift intervals, focusing on the properties of the quiescent galaxies residing on the red sequence. Here, we will use the term “quiescent” to signify old stellar populations with red rest-frame colors ($U$-$V\!\gtrsim$1.4) that are not vigorously forming stars. Following @Brammer09, we correct the rest-frame $U$-$V$ colors for dust reddening allowing a clean separation of the red and blue sequences. As expected, the star formation rates of these “quiescent” galaxies from SED modeling are typically low (the median SFR is 0.2 M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$), although some probably have ongoing star formation up to the level of $\sim$10 M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$. Probing the internal scatter for the first time at $z\!\gtrsim$1, we show trends of $U$-$V$ color with the relative ages of the stellar populations and the composite rest-frame spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of all quiescent galaxies. We show that the results would be similar if we used the $UVJ$ color selection of @Williams09. Finally, we place constraints on the star formation histories for passive evolution given the observed intrinsic scatter as a function of redshift.
We assume a $\Lambda$CDM cosmology with $\Omega_{M}$=0.3, $\Omega_{\Lambda}$=0.7, and $H_{0}$=70 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ throughout the paper. All magnitudes are given in the AB system.
Data
====
The NEWFIRM Medium-Band Survey (NMBS) employs a new technique of using medium-bandwidth near-IR filters to sample the Balmer/4000Å break from $1.5<z<3.5$ at a higher resolution than the standard broadband near-IR filters [@vanDokkum09a], thereby improving the accuracy of the photometric redshifts. We briefly summarize the survey here, the full details of the reduction, source detection, and generation of the photometric catalogs will be described in K.E. Whitaker et al. (*in prep*). The NMBS survey is based on a similar concept to the optical medium-band filters used in the COMBO-17 survey [@Wolf03]. A custom set of five medium bandwidth filters in the wavelength range of 1-1.7$\mu$m were manufactured for the NEWFIRM camera on the Kitt Peak 4m telescope for the survey. Data were taken over the 2008A, 2008B, and 2009A semesters, with a total of 75 nights (45 nights through the NOAO Survey Program and an additional 30 nights through a Yale-NOAO time trade).
The survey targets two $\sim$0.25 deg$^{2}$ fields within the Cosmological Evolution Survey (COSMOS) and All-wavelength Extended Groth Strip International Survey (AEGIS), chosen to take advantage of the wealth of publically-available ancillary data over a broad wavelength range. We combine our five medium-band near-IR images and a broad-band $K$-band image taken with the NEWFIRM camera with optical images in the $ugriz$ broad-band filters of both survey fields, made publically available through the CFHT Legacy Survey[^1], using images reduced by the CARS team [@Erben09; @Hildebrandt09]. Additionally, we include deep Subaru images with the $B_{J}V_{J}r^{+}i^{+}z^{+}$ broad-band filters in the COSMOS field [@Capak07]. Finally, we include IR images in the $Spitzer$-IRAC bands over the entire COSMOS pointing that are provided by the S-COSMOS survey [@Sanders07], and partial coverage of the AEGIS pointing ($\sim\!$0.15 deg$^{2}$) overlapping with the Extended Groth Strip [@Barmby08].
In this study, we use a $K$-selected catalog generated from the 2008A and 2008B semesters only. The AEGIS catalog contains 15 filters and the COSMOS catalog contains 21 filters ($u$-8$\mu$m). The optical and near-IR images were convolved to the same point-spread function (PSF) before performing aperture photometry, so as to limit any bandpass-dependent effects. The photometry was done with SExtractor [@Bertin96] in relatively small color apertures chosen to optimize the signal-to-noise. We determine an additional aperture correction from the $K$-band image that accounts for flux that falls outside of the AUTO aperture, thereby enabling us to calculate total magnitudes [see, e.g. @Labbe03]. We use an alternative source fitting algorithm especially suited for heavily confused images for which a higher resolution prior (in this case, the $K$-band image) is available to extract the photometry from the IRAC images[^2]. This method is described in more detail in the appendix of @Marchesini09.
Using the EAZY photometric redshift and rest-frame color code [@Brammer08], we find the photometric redshifts in COSMOS to be in excellent agreement with the spectroscopic redshifts made publically available through the $z$COSMOS survey [@Lilly07], with $\sigma_{z}$/(1+$z$)=0.016 for 632 objects at $z_\mathrm{spec}\!<$1. We also find excellent agreement between the photometric and spectroscopic redshifts for a larger sample of 2313 objects at $z_\mathrm{spec}\!<$1.5 in AEGIS from the DEEP2 survey [@Davis03] with $\sigma_{z}$/(1+$z$)=0.017. Both fields have very few catastrophic failures, with only 3% $>$5$\sigma$ outliers. Spectroscopic redshifts also exist for 125 Lyman Break Galaxies (LBGs) at $z\!\sim$3 within the AEGIS field from @Steidel03, for which we find $\sigma_{z}$/(1+$z$)=0.045, with 10% $>$5$\sigma$ outliers. However, we note that LBGs are very faint in the rest-frame optical (observer’s near-IR) and their spectra have relatively weak Balmer/4000Å breaks. There is excellent agreement between the NMBS photometric redshifts and the Gemini/GNIRS redshifts from @Kriek06, with a biweight scatter in ($z_{\mathrm{phot}}-z_{\mathrm{spec}}$)/(1+$\!z_{\mathrm{spec}}$) of only 0.010, albeit this is only for four galaxies [see @vanDokkum09a]. The photometric redshift accuracies range from $\sigma_{z}$/(1+$z$)$\sim\!0.01$ for galaxies with stronger Balmer/4000Å breaks to $\sigma_{z}$/(1+$z$)$\sim\!0.05$ for galaxies with less defined breaks. The lack of spectroscopic redshifts above $z\sim\!1$ highlights the necessity for both follow-up spectroscopy at high redshift, as well as the innovation of new techniques to accurately diagnose the reliability of the photometric redshifts [see @Quadri09].
From the best-fit EAZY template, we compute the rest-frame $U$-$V$ colors following the method used by @Wolf03 in the COMBO-17 survey. We measure the rest frame $U$-$V$ color from the best-fit template, using the filter definitions of @Maiz06. When using closely-spaced medium-band observed filters, the template fluxes are found to be more robust than interpolating between observed filters (see Brammer et al. *in prep*). The resulting $U$-$V$ colors have average uncertainties of $\sim$0.058$\pm$0.008 mag for the entire sample of massive ($>$10$^{11}$M$_{\odot}$) galaxies, as determined from both systematic uncertainties and Monte Carlo simulations (described in detail in §3.2).
We fit the photometry with stellar population synthesis templates using FAST [@Kriek09], fixing the redshift to the EAZY output (or the spectroscopic redshift where available), and determine the best-fit age, dust extinction, star formation timescale, stellar mass, and star formation rate. The models input to FAST are a grid of @Maraston05 models that assume a @Kroupa01 IMF with solar metallicity and a range of ages (7.6-10.1 Gyrs), exponentially declining star formation histories ($7<\tau<10$ in log years) and dust extinction ($0<A_{V}<4$). The dust content is parameterized by the extinction in the V-band following the @Calzetti00 extinction law[^3].
In this paper, we select massive ($>$10$^{11}$M$_{\odot}$) galaxies in four redshift bins from the NMBS that sample roughly equal co-moving volumes (with the exception of the lowest redshift bin). Within this sample of massive galaxies, we are interested in understanding galaxies that are on the red sequence because they have old, evolved stellar populations. At high $z$, where we currently lack morphological information, we must devise a method for selection of dusty, star-forming galaxies masquerading as red, quiescent galaxies.
The Age Spread of Quiescent Galaxies
====================================
Selecting Quiescent Galaxies
----------------------------
The color-mass relation is shown in the top panels of Figure 1. Clearly, the majority of massive galaxies with masses $>$10$^{11}$ M$_{\odot}$ are red at all redshifts to $z$=2. However, a significant fraction of these galaxies are red because of dust, not because they have old, evolved stellar populations [e.g. @Wyder07; @Cowie08; @Brammer09].
Following @Brammer09, we select quiescent galaxies by requiring, $$(U-V)'-\Delta_{UV}-(2.03-0.77\cdot t_{LB}/t_{H})>-0.4,$$
where ($U$-$V$)$'$ is the rest-frame $U$-$V$ color with the slope of the color-magnitude relation removed using the non-evolving slope from @Bell04 and $\Delta_{UV}$ is dust reddening correction factor of $0.47\cdot A_{V}$ (the visual extinction) as derived using the @Calzetti00 exinction law. The final term accounts for a mean linear color evolution with time, where $t_{\mathrm{LB}}$ is the lookback time and $t_{\mathrm{H}}$ is the Hubble time. The average selection given by Equation 1 corresponds to the dashed horizontal line at each redshift interval. The selection method removes dusty, star forming galaxies based on their extinction thereby leaving us with the red sequence. This selection is similar to and more conservative than the $UVJ$ selection of @Labbe05 and @Williams09 (see Appendix A).
Comparing the observed $U$-$V$ color to the color with an additional dust-correction $\Delta_{\mathrm{UV}}$ (top and bottom panels in Figure 1, respectively), we find that not all massive red galaxies are old, as there is a significant population of dusty and star forming massive galaxies at $z\!>$1 [see @Brammer09]. Those star forming galaxies that are dusty interlopers are marked as green stars in the bottom panels of Figure 1 and removed from the sample through the above selection method. Additionally, those galaxies that have MIPS detections ($>$20$\mu$Jy) are indicated with small red circles, but are not removed from the sample[^4]; these objects likely host active galactic nuclei (AGN) or may be forming stars [see also @Daddi07]. We note that the scatter measured in $U$-$V$ decreases by $\sim\!0.03$ mag at $z\sim\!0.5$ and $\sim\!$0.01-0.02 at higher redshifts when removing all MIPS-detected quiescent galaxies. The extinction correction effectively reduces the number of galaxies in the transition zone between the blue cloud and red sequence, revealing distinct populations with bimodal intrinsic colors up to at least $z\!\sim$2.
This selection method is enabled by the increased resolution provided by the near-IR medium-bandwidth filters. The improved sampling of the SEDs enable robust constraints on both the photometric redshifts ($\sim$2% accuracies compared to the $\sim$6-7% accuracies of broad-band $z_{\mathrm{phot}}$ when using all available spectroscopic redshifts) as well as the dust content of the stellar populations [see @Brammer09]. The typical upper and lower 68% confidence intervals on the dust extinction (for both quiescent and star forming galaxies) range from $^{+0.3}_{-0.3}$ at $z\!\sim0.5$ to $^{+0.2}_{-0.1}$ at $z\!\sim2$. Furthermore, the inclusion of IRAC data helps constrain the overall shape of the SED and significantly improves the confidence intervals of the dust extinction for the individual galaxies [e.g. @Labbe05; @Wuyts07; @Muzzin09]. About 20% of the quiescent galaxies have no IRAC coverage as we did not make any restrictions in our selection method, which may imply that their classification as quiescent is less robust [see, e.g., @Labbe05]. We verified that these 20% of objects do not deviate systematically from the trends we see for the sample of objects with IRAC coverage. We note that this selection method is consistent with the $UVJ$-selection, which does not depend on models (see Appendix A.).
In Figure 2, we show two example SEDs from the highest redshift bin normalized at 1$\mu$m to highlight both the improved sampling of the SED as well as the fundamental differences between the SEDs of the quiescent and dusty galaxies. Although both galaxies have red observed $U$-$V$ colors, we see clear distinctions in the continuum shapes of the SEDs. The dusty galaxy (right panel) has a more gradual slope than the instrinsically red, older stellar population (left panel), which shows a well-defined 4000Å break with a peaked SED. With the increased resolution of the medium-band data, we are able to distinguish the continuum shapes and properties of galaxies residing on the red sequence to remove dusty contaminants such as the galaxy in the right panel.
The issue of the ongoing star-formation in these galaxies is ambiguous, as this depends on the definition of a “quiescent” galaxy and is very model-dependent: for an individual quiescent galaxy the 1$\sigma$ range of specific star formation rates (sSFR) from the SED modeling described in §2 is on average 0 to 0.004 Gyr$^{-1}$ out to $z$=2 [see also @Kriek08]. Degeneracies between the age, dust, and mass in models complicate matters when selecting “quiescent” galaxies based on their sSFRs. The observational selection of quiescent galaxies in this work is less model dependent than @Romeo08 for example, who select quiescent galaxies by sSFR $<$0.01 Gyr$^{-1}$ from their simulations. About $\sim$35% of our quiescent galaxies at $1.8<z<2.2$ appear to have sSFRs $>$0.01 Gyr$^{-1}$, with a maximum sSFR of $\sim$0.06 Gyr$^{-1}$ (as determined from SED modeling). This fraction decreases to $\sim$14% by $0.2<z<0.9$, with a maximum sSFR of 0.02 Gyr$^{-1}$. A sample of quiescent galaxies selected solely on best-fit sSFR would be biased against including the blue tail of the distribution of galaxies that may be the most recent additions to the red sequence. In Appendix A, we repeat key parts of the analysis using an alternative selection of quiescent galaxies, the $UVJ$ method of @Labbe05 and @Williams09. This method naturally isolates a distinct sequence of “red and dead” galaxies in the rest-frame $U$-$V$ versus $V$-$J$ diagram. We find that the results remain essentially unchanged when this selection is used, but note that the $UVJ$ selection includes a slightly higher number of blue galaxies at high redshift.
Deriving the Intrinsic Scatter in Quiescent Galaxies
----------------------------------------------------
In Figure \[scatter\], we show that the observed scatter in the $U$-$V$ color (green) increases with redshift for this sample of massive, quiescent galaxies. We note that the scatter is measured from the actual colors of the quiescent sample, not the dust-corrected colors shown in Figure 1, as there are degeneracies in the models that limit the level of accurarcy of $A_{V}$. To interpret this increase we need to correct for the scatter introduced by photometric errors, thereby measuring the intrinsic scatter. For each quiescent galaxy, the observed $u$-8$\mu$m fluxes were each perturbed by a normally-distributed, pseudo-random number from a Gaussian distribution with a mean of zero and a standard deviation of the photometric error for each respective filter. From these perturbed flux values, we generate 50 simulated catalogs and use EAZY to re-determine $U$-$V$, refitting the photometric redshifts. We take the biweight sigma of the $U$-$V$ distribution for each galaxy to signify the uncertainty in the color. The average uncertainty in the colors due to photometric error for all massive ($>$10$^{11}$ M$_{\odot}$) galaxies ranges from 0.008 mag at $z$=0.5 to 0.05 mag at $z$=2[^5].
We calculated the contribution of the photometric error to our measurement in the scatter of $U$-$V$ by creating a sample of mock galaxies with an intrinsic scatter of 0 (in other words, all galaxies have the same $U$-$V$ color). Each mock galaxy is assigned a value for the scatter in $U$-$V$ that comes from our simulations as described above, and we then perturb the colors by an amount that is drawn from a Gaussian distribution with width equal to the color uncertainty. The scatter of colors in the resulting sample is then taken to be the contribution of photometric errors to the overall observed scatter. Finally, in order to reduce random uncertainties, we repeat this procedure 100 times. The contribution to the observed $U$-$V$ scatter from photometric error increases with $z$, as one might expect, from 0.007$\pm$0.005 mag at $0.2<z<0.9$ up to 0.05$\pm$0.02 mag at $1.8<z<2.2$, but it is significantly less than the observed color scatter at all redshifts. We note that the uncertainties in the $U$-$V$ colors are smaller than the observed flux error bars that sample the rest-frame $U$ and $V$ regions. The rest-frame $U$ and $V$ fluxes are typically calculated from 2-3 medium band filters, which reduces the uncertainties.
The errors in the photometry are very small at low redshift; therefore any perturbation of the fluxes does not significantly change the photometric redshift and the $U$-$V$ color. There are however systematic uncertainties that will contribute to the measured scatter. To assess the effects of systematic errors, we use the 75 quiescent galaxies at $0.2<z<0.9$ that have a spectroscopic redshift. We compared the $U$-$V$ colors measured for these quiescent galaxies from the photometric redshifts to the color measured using the spectroscopic redshifts. The error in redshift is strongly correlated with the resulting error in color, where an under-estimate in $z_{\mathrm{phot}}$ of 0.1, leads to a $U$-$V$ color that is $\sim$0.2 mag redder (see Appendix C). The normalized median absolute deviation of ($U$-$V$)$_{\mathrm{spec}}$-($U$-$V$)$_{\mathrm{phot}}$ is 0.05 magnitudes. We conservatively assume that the contribution to the measured scatter due to systematic uncertainties is 0.05 mag at all redshifts, but note that this may decrease at higher redshifts as our medium-band filters sample the rest-frame $U$ and $V$ filters at $z\!>$1. The scatter in the color due to measurement error is taken to be the systematic and photometric errors added in quadrature (blue points in Figure \[scatter\]).
To measure the internal scatter in $U$-$V$ in Figure \[scatter\] (black), we subtract the scatter due to measurement error (blue) in quadrature from the observed scatter. The vertical black error bars are the uncertainties in the median value of the photometric scatter and the horizontal black error bars are the bin size. The grey filled region indicates the range of $\sigma_{U-V}$ values we measure when we raise and lower the horizontal limit in Figure 1 by 0.2 magnitudes, thereby changing the number of quiescent galaxies selected. Regardless of the selection limit, we find an increasing intrinsic scatter with redshift. We compare our measurements to work done by @Bower92 in the Coma Cluster, as well as a study of the massive (M$_{\mathrm{dyn}}\!>$10$^{11}$ M$_{\odot}$) early-type galaxies in 7 clusters from $z$=0.18 to 0.84 [@vanDokkum08b]. We find that the scatter at $z$=0.5 is similar to the intrinsic scatter of field galaxies recently measured by @Ruhland09[^6], but a factor of 2 higher than that measured previously in clusters at these redshifts. This may reflect a systematic difference between field and cluster galaxies or some unrecognizable error contribution within our data. We note that if we limit the quiescent sample to the 75 galaxies with a spectroscopic redshift between $0.2<z<0.9$, we find a very similar (somewhat larger) scatter. @vanDokkum07 found that the massive red sequence galaxies in clusters are typically $\sim$0.4$\pm$0.2 Gyr older than field galaxies. If quenching in the cluster environment occurred 0.4 Gyr before quenching in the field, our models (described in §5) suggest that the intrinsic scatters should be lower by only $\sim$0.02 mag, rather than the $\sim$0.05 mag difference shown in Figure \[scatter\].
![The observed (green) and intrinsic (black) scatter in the rest-frame $U$-$V$ colors of the most massive, quiescent galaxies selected by their extinction-correct $U$-$V$ colors. The scatter due to measurement errors (blue) is subtracted from the observed scatter in quadrature. The vertical black error bars mark the 68% confidence intervals due to photometric errors and the grey filled region indicates how $\sigma_{U-V}$ changes when we raise and lower the horizontal selection limit in Figure 1 by $\pm$0.2 magnitudes. The dashed line is the expected evolution of the intrinic scatter due to passive evolution for galaxies that started forming stars at $z$=3 with a characteristic timescale for transformation into an early-type galaxy of 1.4 Gyrs, with a large burst of star formation before transforming. The observed $U$-$V$ data points used to calculate teh color scatter as a function of redshift are plotted in the bottom panel. We find that the scatter in $U$-$V$ increases towards higher redshift, where the intrinsic scatter is significantly higher than the scatter introduced by photometric and systematic errors at $z\!\sim$2.[]{data-label="scatter"}](fig3_sm.eps)
From Figure \[scatter\], we see that the intrinsic scatter in the colors of quiescent galaxies increases out to $z\!\sim1$ and likely continues to increase to $z\!\sim$2, although there may exist selection biases in this regime. It seems likely that the trend at $1<z<2$ is real given the recent results of @Hilton09, who measure an intrinsic $z_{\mathrm{850}}$-$J$ scatter (close to the rest-frame $U$-$V$) of 0.123$\pm$0.049 magnitudes for a cluster at $z=1.46$, and @Papovich10, who find $\sigma_{\mathrm{U-B}}$=0.136$\pm$0.024 magnitudes for a cluster at $z=1.62$. Furthermore, the color scatter is in qualitative agreement with the predictions of simple passive evolution models that the scatter in color should decrease as the galaxies evolve.
Origin of the Intrinsic Scatter in Quiescent Galaxies
-----------------------------------------------------
To understand the origin of the intrinsic scatter in $U$-$V$, we consider the properties of these stellar populations through spectral synthesis modeling. The scatter in the red sequence is thought to be determined by the scatter in both the age and metallicity, where the scatter in relative ages is generally thought to be the dominant driver [e.g. @Bower92; @Gallazzi06]. The range of metallicities observed for local red sequence ellipticals from SDSS DR2 is $\sim$0.8-1.6 Z$_{\odot}$ from the faintest to the brightest galaxies, with a $g$-$r$ color scatter of $\sim$0.04-0.05 magnitudes [@Gallazzi06]. In this work, we fix the metallicity to Z$_{\odot}$, but we cannot exclude that metallicity variations contribute to the scatter. We test the effects of metallicity on the scatter in $U$-$V$ color in Appendix E, finding a weak and opposite trend for the color scatter due to metallicity variations with redshift. Given the observed scatter in Figure \[scatter\], it is unlikely that metallicity has a large effect on this work.
The age as defined in stellar populations models strongly depends on the choice of star formation history. To simplify, we assume an expontentially decaying star formation history with $\tau$=0.1 Gyr and $0<A_{V}<3$. Using the stellar population synthesis code FAST [@Kriek09] with the @Maraston05 models and a @Kroupa01 IMF, we fit for the age of these stellar populations given the above constraints. Given our assumptions, we effectively measure the relative ages (and dust) of the quiescent galaxies, fixing all other parameters.
![These panels contain the ages of quiescent galaxies (as derived from spectral synthesis models in §3.2) as a function of rest-frame $U$-$V$ color, in four redshift bins. The reddest and bluest $U$-$V$ quartiles are denoted by the colors red and blue, respectively, while the grey points are the middle quartiles. The dotted line signifies the maximum age of the universe within each redshift bin. The bottom panels contain histograms of colors, where the red and blue dotted lines in the bottom panels are the median colors of the two quartiles and the black, dashed line is the median color over the entire redshift interval. The general trend at all redshifts is that redder galaxies are typically older than bluer quiescent galaxies.[]{data-label="agecolor"}](fig4_sm.eps)
Absolute ages may not be very meaningful given our modeling approach, but the relative ages of blue and red galaxies are robust if we assume that they have similar star formation histories. In Figure \[agecolor\], we plot the best-fit age of all quiescent galaxies as a function of their rest-frame $U$-$V$ color. The reddest galaxies have systematically older stellar populations than the bluest galaxies at all redshifts. Given the assumption of solar metallicity, there exist a few quiescent galaxies consistent with the age of the universe (dotted horizontal lines) at $z\!\gtrsim$1. We include the typical 68% confidence intervals in the ages in Figure \[agecolor\] from the modeling described in §2, rather than the modeling in §3.3, as the average uncertainty is much smaller than what we expect given our assumptions in the modeling due to degeneracies between age and metallicity. Additionally, we plot the typical random and systematic errors in the $U$-$V$ color as a function of redshift in Figure \[agecolor\]. At $z\!<$1.5, the red and blue quartiles have the same low-level of dust reddening, whereas at $z\!>$1.5 the red quiescent galaxies have $\sim$0.2 magnitudes more extinction.
Rest-Frame SEDs of Quiescent Galaxies
-------------------------------------
We note that the general trends in Figure \[agecolor\] do not prove that we are measuring age differences, as bluer $U$-$V$ colors will force a lower age in the fit, even if the range in $U$-$V$ is due to photometric scatter only (see Appendix B for more details on the effects of photometric scatter). In the previous section we just considered the $U$-$V$ colors, we will now investigate the shape of the full observed rest-frame SEDs of these galaxies to see if there is a fundamental difference between the reddest and bluest galaxies on the red sequence.
![The effect of resolution can be seen in this figure, where the thin black line is the average best-fit model to the rest-frame composite SED from the medium-band measurements of 46 reddest galaxies over the redshift range $0.9<z<1.4$ (also shown in Figure \[SEDs\]). If this model is then smoothed with a Gaussian with a width equal to the resolution of the medium-band filters, 0.15$\mu$m/(1+$z$), we see that the smoothed model at medium-band resolution (thick black line) is smoother than the model at original resolution, but still follows the shape of the Balmer/4000$\mathrm{\AA}$-break region closely. Note that we mark the location of the 4000$\mathrm{\AA}$-break with an arrow. We then smooth the models with a Gaussian that has a width equal to the typical resolution of broad-band filters, 0.4$\mu$m/(1+$z$) (dashed line). The Balmer/4000$\mathrm{\AA}$-break has become washed out due to the poor resolution. []{data-label="resolution"}](fig5_sm.eps)
Stellar populations with ages of $\sim$0.8 Gyr will have strong Balmer breaks at 3646$\mathrm{\AA}$, whereas older populations will have pronounced 4000Å breaks. Although the differences will be subtle, the SEDs of galaxies with ages of $\sim$0.8-1 Gyr should be distinct from older stellar populations. This has not been observed previously at high $z$ because the $J$, $H$, and $K$ broad-band filters smooth over these spectral features. Figure \[resolution\] demonstrates the importance of the spectral resolution by comparing the composite SED of the reddest quartile at $0.9<z<1.4$ (light grey points) to models smoothed to the resolution of the medium- and broad-band filters. For the first time, we are able to distinguish these features with the NMBS due to the increased sampling of the Balmer/4000Å break region by the medium-band filters and the accurate photometric redshifts. We therefore consider the rest-frame SEDs of these quiescent galaxies to understand if the intrinsic scatter we measure is really due to the ages of the galaxies. Specifically, we are interested in the SEDs of the reddest and bluest quartiles (red and blue, respectively, in Figure \[agecolor\]). If the scatter is due to age as implied from the spectral synthesis modeling, we should see an increasing dichotomy in the SEDs of these quartiles as we look to higher $z$, where we observe an increasing internal scatter in color.
With the improved resolution and photometric redshift accuracies of the medium-band filters, we are able to measure the relative ages of a complete sample of massive galaxies inhabiting the red sequence out to $z\!\sim$2 for the first time. The rest-frame SEDs of these massive galaxies are plotted in Figure \[SEDs\], including all individual observed fluxes from $u$-8$\mu$m shifted to the rest-frame for all quiescent galaxies, normalized at 7000$\mathrm{\AA}$. We consider the SEDs of the reddest and bluest quartiles in $U$-$V$ (shown in the inset $U$-$V$ histograms), where the observed fluxes of the galaxies with the reddest colors are indicated with red points and the bluest galaxies with blue points. The median best-fit spectral synthesis model templates for the reddest and bluest quartiles are the solid lines in Figure \[SEDs\], using the FAST settings as described in §3.3. The models are shown in Figure \[SEDs\] with Gaussian smoothing by the average rest-frame distance between the medium-band filters of $\sim0.15\mu$m/(1+$z$). Notice that there is more smoothing at lower redshift (due to the dependence of the resolution on the scale factor) and we therefore expect to resolve the Balmer/4000$\mathrm{\AA}$-break region with higher resolution at high-$z$ because the medium-band filters span a shorter wavelength range.
We see an increasing dichotomy between the SEDs of the reddest, oldest galaxies and the bluest, youngest galaxies relative to 7000Å with the increasing intrinsic scatter in color. The SEDs are not only different in $U$-$V$, which is how they are selected (and also template dependent), rather at $all$ rest-frame wavelengths. Furthermore, we plot all observed fluxes for our sample of galaxies in the right panels of Figure \[SEDs\] to demonstrate the robustness and fundamental differences between the reddest and bluest galaxies on the red sequence. The remaining 50% of the sample that have intermediate $U$-$V$ colors (grey points) bridge the gap between the SEDs of the reddest and bluest quartiles at $z\!\sim$2. With the composite rest-frame SEDs, we sample the Balmer/4000Å break region with sufficient resolution to distinguish between a Balmer- or 4000$\mathrm{\AA}$-break. We note that the models do not fit the lowest redshift galaxies very well, tending to force slightly larger differences between the quadrants at $0.4<\lambda_{\mathrm{rest}}<0.6\mu$m than observed. As a test, we have included different metallicities in the modeling described in §3.3, and we find that they reduce the discrepency between the best-fit model and data points seen for the reddest galaxies at $z\lesssim\!1.5$ slightly, but not entirely.
In the high redshift bins, we see that the bluest, youngest galaxies emit more radiation than the reddest galaxies at all wavelengths $<$7000$\mathrm{\AA}$. In particular, the region around 0.4-0.5$\mu$m and $\lesssim$0.3$\mu$m (blueward of the $U$-band) show clear differences between the red and blue quiescent galaxies. These galaxies that populate the blue tail of the distribution have younger ages and bluer colors at higher redshifts. Focusing on the rest-frame UV wavelength regime, we see a factor of $>$2 increase in the continuum emission for the blue quartile with increasing redshift. Additionally, we see the flux in the Balmer break region grow in strength with increasing redshift.
While the SEDs of the bluest galaxies undergo significant evolution from $z$=0.2 to 2.2, the oldest galaxies remain virtually unchanged. The old galaxies inhabit a very small range of $U$-$V$ colors with uniform spectral shapes at all redshifts. The rest-frame UV continuum is very faint and the galaxies have strong (smoothed) 4000Å breaks. We conclude that the increase in the $U$-$V$ scatter is driven by an increase in the dispersion of spectral types; there is a significant population of younger, blue quiescent galaxies at $z\!\sim$2 that are nearly absent by $z\!\sim$0.5. The observed rest-frame SEDs confirm that the major driver of the intrinsic scatter in color of the red sequence is the scatter in age, as the stellar populations originate from varying epochs in the universe. In Appendix B, we show that our results are robust against severe underestimates of the photometric errors, and against large systematic redshift errors. Additionally, we test the effects of dust and ongoing star formation on the composite SEDs in Appendix D.
The Reddest Galaxies at $z\!\sim$2
==================================
@Kriek06 (hereafter K06) were the first to show that many massive high-$z$ galaxies have no (strong) emission lines and have strong Balmer/4000Å breaks within their spectroscopic sample of 9 quiescent galaxies. The K06 sample of quiescent galaxies had relatively young ages of 0.5-1 Gyr. Perhaps the most striking feature of Figures \[agecolor\] & \[SEDs\] is that we see evidence for very old galaxies at $z\!\sim$2 that seem to have more evolved stellar populations than the K06 sample, with higher M/L ratios.
Selection effects may explain why the K06 did not find the more evolved galaxies we observe with the NMBS. The K06 NIR spectroscopic survey selected targets from the MUSYC $K$-selected photometric catalog [@Gawiser06; @Quadri07], choosing galaxies with photometric redshifts of $z\!\sim$2.3. The targets were selected to a limiting magnitude of 21.6 in AB magnitudes to ensure an adequate signal-to-noise ratio for the NIR spectra.
In order to illustrate the difference between a magnitude-limited sample and a mass-limited sample, in Figure \[K06trends\] we show the binned $U$-$V$ colors and ages (as derived in §3.3) as a function of the total $K$-band magnitude for all quiescent galaxies with photometric redshifts between $z$=1.8 and 2.2. Brighter galaxies tend to have bluer colors and younger ages. We also note that we are observing an inversion of the color-magnitude relation. In Figure \[K06trends\], the dashed line is the median $K$-band magnitude of the 9 spectroscopically-confirmed quiescent galaxies from K06 and the dotted line is the limiting magnitude of the spectroscopic survey. Both limits have been increased by $\!\sim$0.4 magnitudes to account for the difference in median redshift: $z\!\sim$2.3 for K06 and $z\!\sim$2 for our sample (assuming no evolution). The magnitude-limited sample would not include galaxies that lie in the hashed region, thereby biasing the sample against the reddest and oldest galaxies.
![The binned $U$-$V$ color and ages of all quiescent galaxies as a function of their total $K$-band magnitudes. The dashed line is the median K-band magnitude of the 9 spectroscopically-confirmed quiescent galaxies by [@Kriek06] and the dotted line is the limiting magnitude used by Kriek et al. to select their sample. The reddest and oldest galaxies in the hashed region would therefore not be included in the Kriek et al. magnitude-limited sample.[]{data-label="K06trends"}](fig7_sm.eps)
![The composite rest-frame SED of the reddest and bluest $U$-$V$ quartiles of massive, quiescent galaxies from $z$=1.8 to 2.2 (red and blue points). The solid lines are the median best-fit templates as derived from the spectral modeling analysis with Gaussian smoothing to the medium-band resolution of 0.15$\mu$m/(1+$z$), compared to the median binned spectra of 9 quiescent galaxies at $z\!\sim$2.3 from @Kriek06 (dot-dashed line, also smoothed to the medium-band resolution). The Kriek et al. sample match the spectral shape of the blue quartile. We also fit the Kriek et al. median spectra with a $\tau$-model (see §4) and aged this best-fit model of 0.8 Gyr by $+$0.4 Gyr to evolve the spectra to the average redshift of the medium-band data of $z\!\sim$2 (black line). The median, aged K06 spectra lies roughly between the extremes of our sample, which implies that typical $z\!\sim$2 quiescent galaxies may be the descendents of the K06 sample.[]{data-label="K06SED"}](fig8_sm.eps)
In §3.4, we showed that the spectral shapes of the reddest and bluest galaxies on the red sequence are fundamentally different at $z\!\sim$2. We compare the SEDs of the spectroscopically-confirmed quiescent galaxies from K06 to our mass-selected sample in Figure \[K06SED\]. The median rest-frame spectra of the K06 sample of quiescent galaxies binned to low resolution (grey shaded region) and smoothed with a Gaussian to the medium-band resolution matches the median SED of the bluest quiescent galaxies in our sample.
We cannot exclude the possibility that the differences between the spectra arise because we are comparing the K06 sample to galaxies at a slightly lower redshift. Because the galaxies in the spectroscopic sample will have aged by $\!\sim$0.4 Gyr between $\langle z\rangle$=2.3 and 2, we fit the K06 spectra with a $\tau$-model using the settings described in §3.3 finding a best-fit age of 0.8 Gyr, and age this best-fit model by $+$0.4 Gyr (black line in Figure \[K06SED\]). The median, aged K06 spectra lies roughly between the two extremes of our sample, which implies that typical $z$=2 galaxies could be descendants of the $z\!\sim$2.3 galaxies of K06. It will be interesting to see whether very old galaxies exist at $z\!\sim$2.5 and beyond.
Figures \[K06trends\] and \[K06SED\] illustrate the differences between mass-limited and magnitude-limited samples. Although a simple magnitude limit is practical, one must be aware of the ways in which the limit can introduce biases into the galaxy sample. With our complete, mass-limited simple, we are able to quantify the build up of the massive end of the red sequence by using our observations to constrain models.
Build up of the Red Sequence
============================
Given the observed evolution in the $U$-$V$ scatter and the trends with age, we next look to simple models to explain the build up of the red sequence. In Figure \[buildup\], we see that the fraction of massive galaxies with intrinsically red colors due to evolved stellar populations increases with time. At higher redshift, there is an increasing fraction of massive galaxies that are dusty and star forming, inhabiting the region close to the green valley in the CMR. About 90% of the most massive galaxies are quiescent at $z\!<$1. We note that our sample of massive galaxies is selected with a fixed mass limit of 10$^{11}$ M$_{\odot}$ at all redshifts and will therefore not account for mass evolution. To test how sensitive the fractions are to the adopted mass limit, we also select a sample of massive galaxies at a constant number density of $n$ = 2$\times$10$^{-4}$ Mpc$^{-3}$ following @vanDokkum10. The resulting fraction of quiescent and active galaxies is nearly identical to the fractions for a fixed mass limit. The uncertainty in the fraction of quiescent galaxies due mass evolution are indicated with the error bars in Figure \[buildup\]. We also show the range of fractions that result when the selection limit (in Figure 1) is varied by $\pm$0.2 magnitudes (grey filled region).
Our results are consistent with many high redshift studies, which have found a significant fraction of quiescent galaxies in place at $z\!>$2 [e.g. @Fontana09; @Williams09]. We find that the most massive objects at $z$=1.5-2 are divided roughly equally between star forming and quiescent galaxies, the same results as @Williams09 and @Fontana09. Consistent with previous work [e.g. @Kriek08; @Damen09; @Fontana09], we find that the massive, quiescent galaxies observed at $z\!\sim$2 assembled most of their stellar mass at higher redshifts.
The observed evolution of the fraction of quiescent galaxies and the color scatter can constrain simple passive evolution models with “progenitor bias”[^7]. The Passive Evolution Calculator[^8] [@vanDokkum01] models the evolution with three parameters: $t_{\mathrm{start}}$, $\tau_{\mathrm{stop}}$ and $f_{\star}$. The parameter $t_{\mathrm{start}}$ is the time when star formation starts and the parameter $\tau_{\mathrm{stop}}$ is the characteristic scale for the probability distribution of the times when star formation stops. The variation of the star formation rate is accounted for with the dimensionless parameter $f_{\star}$; the star formation history can include bursts and increasing or decreasing continuous formation rates as a function of time. Once the star formation is quenched in galaxies, the luminosity and color evolution is well approximated by a single-age population of stars with the same luminosity-weighted mean age (see van Dokkum & Franx 2001). The parameter $f_{\star}$ can range between 0 and 1; the limiting case of $f_{\star}\!\sim$0 implies that most of the stars formed close to the start of star formation, $f_{\star}\!\sim$0.5 is a roughly constant star formation history and when $f_{\star}\!\sim$1, the luminosity-weighted mean age of the stellar populations is dominated by a burst at the end of the star formation history. These models can be applied to observations of early-type galaxies, enabling fits to the early-type galaxy fraction, the mean color evolution and the scatter in the CMR[^9].
![The fraction of massive galaxies ($>$10$^{11}$M$_{\odot}$) that are quiescent (black squares) and still star forming (green stars). Additionally, the quiescent galaxies are broken down by those old galaxies that have stellar populations $>$1.5 Gyr (red circles) and those that are younger with ages $<$1.5 Gyr (blue triangles), as derived from the SED modeling described in §2. The black dashed line is the expected evolution of the fraction of early-type galaxies from passive evolution given the observed scatter in $U$-$V$. At $z\!\sim$1.5-2, roughly half of the most massive galaxies are quiescent.[]{data-label="buildup"}](fig9_sm.eps)
Here, we use the Passive Evolution Calculator to predict the redshift evolution of $U$-$V$, the rms scatter in $U$-$V$ and the fraction of today’s early-types that are in place by redshift $z$ for early-type galaxies that started forming stars at $z$=3. We assume the timescale for transformation to quiescent galaxies is zero (in other words, the truncation of star formation is instantaneous) and vary the probability distribution of stop times for transformation from star forming galaxy to quiescent galaxy, $\tau_{\mathrm{stop}}$, and the form of the star formation history of the individual galaxies, $f_{\star}$. By matching the predicted intrinsic scatter in $U$-$V$ to the observed scatter, we find a best-fit characteristic timescale for transformation of $\tau_{\mathrm{stop}}$=1.4$^{+0.3}_{-0.5}$ Gyrs and a luminosity weighted formation time of the stars of $f_{\star}$=0.92$^{+0.03}_{-0.05}$. The best-fit model broadly reproduces the observed scatter in Figure \[scatter\] and the early-type fraction in Figure \[buildup\], although the fit is not particulary good at high redshift.
The resulting best-fit values result in low values of $\tau_{\mathrm{stop}}$, which implies that the most massive early-type galaxies mainly formed at high redshift. This result is consistent with @Marchesini09, who find that there is very little evolution in the number density of the most massive galaxies from $z\!\sim$4 to 1.5, pointing towards a high formation redshift for the most massive galaxies in the universe. Furthermore, the relatively high values of $f_{\star}$ indicate that these galaxies experienced a burst of star formation close to the end of the period of star formation. These results indicate that massive, dusty galaxies with high star formation rates may be the progenitors of the most massive quiescent early-type galaxies. According to this simple model, about $\sim$20% of the massive, dusty star forming galaxies at $z\!\sim$2 have specific star formation rates $>$1 Gyr$^{-1}$. This resevoir of massive dusty star-forming galaxies will likely soon quench and migrate to the red sequence at lower redshifts.
The evolution of the red sequence may involve more complicated processes beyond simple passive evolution. For example, we see that the observed fraction of quiescent galaxies evolves more strongly beyond $z\!\sim$1.5 in Figure \[buildup\], the same epoch where the color evolution seems to be inconsistent with passive evolution. The predicted evolution of the early-type fraction from passive evolution (dashed line in Figure \[buildup\]) is less steep than the observed evolution at $z\!\gtrsim$1.5. Using a very similar selection of galaxies from the NMBS, @vanDokkum10 calculate that the star formation rate drops by a factor of 20 from $z$=2 to $z$=1.1, whereas the stellar mass grows only by a factor of 1.4 in the same redshift interval. This rapid evolution implies that more complicated processes may govern the quenching of star formation. Additionally, once galaxies have moved to the red sequence there may still be other physical mechanisms acting aside from simple passive evolution.
We plot the mean $U$-$V$ color as a function of redshift in Figure \[meancolor\] and compare this with the predictions from the models, which are forced to agree with the mean $U$-$V$ color at $z$=0.5. It is interesting that there is no evolution in color between $z$=2 and 1.6, as this implies that this epoch is where the red sequence is most heavily supplemented with newly quenched galaxies. Although the $\sigma_{\mathrm{U-V}}$ and early-type fractions appear consistent with passively evolving galaxies with a range of truncation times at $z\!\lesssim$1.5, the observed color evolution is clearly inconsistent. Even the most extreme case of the color evolution of a single stellar population (SSP) formed at a redshift of infinity is inconsistent with the $z\!\sim$2 mean color. The grey filled region shows the selection effect of changing the color limit by $\pm$0.2 magnitudes. Reducing the lower boundary of the $U$-$V$ color selection will result in a bluer mean color at $z\!\sim$2, but it cannot reconcile the difference between the data and the best-fit model from the color scatter (although the extreme case of a SSP formed at $z=\infty$ does agree for the lowest magnitude selection limit only). This discrepancy between the observed color evolution and the predictions from passive evolution has been noted in other studies [e.g. @Kriek08], and there are several mechanisms that may slow the color evolution of galaxies. Galaxies may be dustier at higher redshift, which will redden the intrinsic colors. A visual extinction of $\sim$0.2-0.3 (which would be consistent with the observed SEDs) will redden the $U$-$V$ color by $\sim$0.1 mag, which is similar to the offset we see at $z\!\sim$1-1.5 between our observed color and that predicted from passive evolution given the observed color scatter (dashed line in Figure \[meancolor\]). The median visual extinction, $A_{V}$, from the spectral synthesis modeling described in §2 of the quiescent galaxies in our sample is 0.3 mag. Regardless, @Kriek08 find that dust does not provide a solution as the absolute color evolution for solar metallicity shows that the $z\!\sim$2 galaxies are not too red, rather the $z\!\sim$0 galaxies are too blue. We note that in this paper we simply normalize the colors at $z$=0.5 and do not consider the absolute values. We explore the effects of dusts on the spectral shapes in more detail in Appendix D, finding that dust may be a secondary effect on the composite SEDs in Figure \[SEDs\].
![The mean rest-frame color with the slope of the CMR removed, ($U$-$V$)$^{\prime}$, as a function of redshift. The color evolution from simple passive evolution models that include growth of the red sequence by transformation of blue galaxies predict too strong a color evolution, espeically the best-fit model to the color scatter (dashed line). The color evolution of a single stellar population forming at infinity (dashed-dot line) disagrees at high redshift, where the mean color flattens between $z\!\sim$1.5-2. Other mechanisms such as dust, dry mergers or “frostings” of young stars may be important to slow the color evolution.[]{data-label="meancolor"}](fig10_sm.eps)
In addition to dust extinction, a plausible mechanism to weaken the color evolution of these quiescent galaxies includes recent low level bursts of star formation. If these galaxies have experienced a recent burst of star formation, a frosting of young stars should be evident in the SEDs of these galaxies. The continuum shape would appear to be a composite of an old stellar population with a strong 4000Å break and a young component visible in the rest-frame UV. We see some evidence for this amongst a fraction of these quiescent galaxies; roughly 10% of the highest redshift galaxies have negative slopes in the rest-frame UV, parameterized by F$_{\lambda}\propto\lambda^{\beta}$. However, a frosting of young stars may be too transient a feature to effect the mean color evolution. We test how ongoing star formation would effect the composite SEDs in Appendix D, finding that a more complex star formation history cannot reproduce the trends of spectral shape with $U$-$V$ color.
Following the work of @Kriek08, another possible mechanism that would slow the color evolution of quiescent galaxies is red mergers. With deep observations of a sample of nearby bulge-dominated early-type galaxies, @vanDokkum05 and @Tal09 find morphological signatures of tidal interactions and infer that red mergers may lead to a factor $\gtrsim$2 evolution in the stellar mass density of luminous red galaxies at $z\!<$1. Red (dry) major mergers of two red sequence galaxies will shift the galaxies towards higher masses for the same color and ages. While the mean ages of the stellar populations are unchanged, red mergers will therefore slow the color evolution and probably become significant at $z\!\lesssim$1-1.5. It is unclear what the dominant mechanism is that slows the color evolution of red sequence galaxies, perhaps all of the methods described above are important at different epochs.
Summary and Conclusions
=======================
------------- ------------- ------------------------------- ------------------------------- ------------------------ ---------------------- -----------
Number Observed Scatter Measurement Scatter Intrinsic Scatter Mean Quiescent
Redshift of Galaxies $\sigma_{\mathrm{U-V}}$ (mag) $\sigma_{\mathrm{U-V}}$ (mag) $\sigma_{\mathrm{U-V}} ($U$-$V$)$^{\prime}$ Fraction
$ (mag)
$0.2<z<0.9$ 203 0.108 0.050 0.095 1.883 0.91
$0.9<z<1.4$ 175 0.153 0.052 0.144 1.726 0.85
$1.4<z<1.8$ 138 0.178 0.056 0.168 1.623 0.70
$1.8<z<2.2$ 54 0.200 0.069 0.188 1.628 0.38
------------- ------------- ------------------------------- ------------------------------- ------------------------ ---------------------- -----------
\[table1\]
In this work, we have selected a complete, mass-selected sample of quiescent galaxies out to $z$=2.2 through a selection based on extinction corrections to the $U$-$V$ colors [@Brammer09]. We first demonstrate that we can measure accurate rest-frame colors at $z$=1-2 using the medium-band filters. We find that the intrinsic scatter in the rest-frame $U$-$V$ color of quiescent galaxies increases with redshift, measuring a scatter that is $\gtrsim2$ times larger than previous cluster measurements at $z\sim0.5$ (see Table 1 for a data summary). This measurement implies a potential real diffence between the evolution of the scatter in the field and in the cluster environment. If confirmed, this may suggest that quiescent cluster galaxies are older than quiescent field galaxies, although the difference would be somewhat larger than found previously from the fundamental plane (see §3.2). The scatter can be explained by trends of $U$-$V$ with the relative ages of the stellar populations. Those galaxies with intrinsically redder $U$-$V$ colors have older stellar populations than those galaxies in the blue tail of the distribution. To bolster the argument, we show the composite rest-frame SEDs for all galaxies in the sample. The rest-frame SEDs highlight the usefulness of the NIR medium-bandwidth filters in sampling the Balmer/4000$\mathrm{\AA}$-break region at a higher resolution than the tradition broadband filters. The observed SEDs show a very clear trend of an emerging spread between quiescent red, old galaxies and quiescent blue, younger quiescent galaxies that exists up to and beyond $z\!\sim$2.
The main result from our paper is that we find both young and old quiescent galaxies at $z\!\sim$2, leading to a relatively large scatter in the $U$-$V$ colors of massive, quiescent galaxies at these redshifts. The presence of a large population of young, quiescent galaxies implies that galaxies were strongly forming stars shortly before star formation ended. As shown in §5, parametarizing the star formation history by $f_{\star}$, which describes the luminosity weighted formation time of the stars for a model that includes progenitor bias and passive evolution, we find $f_{\star}$=0.92$^{+0.03}_{-0.05}$. This star formation history predicts massive galaxies with high sSFRs, which are seen at $z\!\sim$2 in Figure 1. We suspect that these massive, star-forming galaxies at $z\!\sim$2 are the progenitors of massive galaxies at lower redshifts and a few may possibly be detected as sub-mm sources.
The significant population of old galaxies at $z\!\sim$2 pushes back the star formation epoch of the oldest massive galaxies. Galaxies with dominant 4000Å breaks (not post-starburst) comprise $\sim$20% of the total population of massive galaxies at $z\!\sim$2. It is interesting to speculate whether the $z$=7-8 star-forming galaxies that have been found recently in the Hubble Ultra-Deep Field [@Bouwens09; @Oesch10] could be the progenitors of these galaxies. Their stellar masses are 10$^{9-10}$ M$_{\odot}$ [@Labbe10], which may imply that substantial growth would be necessary between $z$=6 and $z$=2. It may also be that more massive galaxies exist than have been found so far in the fields studied at these high redshifts.
Using our high quality SED modeling (including optical through IR photometry, medium-band NIR photometry and accurate photometric redshifts), we find galaxies that appear to be nearly the age of the universe, even at these high redshifts. The oldest galaxies observed in this study may have been under-represented in the spectroscopic studies of red sequence galaxies at $z\!\sim$2.3 by @Kriek06 [@Kriek08]. Kriek et al. draw their targets from a larger sample of galaxies selected to a limiting K-band magnitude of 21.6 in the AB magnitude system. Because they use a magnitude limit, they may have missed the oldest galaxies in the universe. However, deep follow-up spectroscopy of one quiescent galaxy shows that this galaxy, which was initially classified as a post-starburst system, was actually much older and dominated by a 4000$\mathrm{\AA}$ break [@Kriek09]. Although we have good reason to believe this galaxy is not representative of the full sample [see @Kriek09], this case illustrates that caution is required. It is also possible that the differences with the Kriek et al. sample may simply be due to the slightly different mean redshifts. In any case, this work highlights the importance of understanding how a simple magnitude limit can introduce biases into a galaxy sample. With increasing numbers of high-quality surveys becoming public, it is important to select samples to some limiting mass to probe the full range of properties of galaxies.
Future studies combining the NMBS with $HST$ WFC3 imaging will enable more detailed studies of the sizes and morphologies of the most massive galaxies at high redshift. It would be interesting if there exists a relationship between $U$-$V$ and the size of these galaxies, where the reddest quiescent galaxies may also be the most compact. Or perhaps the earliest compact, quiescent galaxies may have had time to grow through mergers between $z\!\sim$3 and 2 and are therefore larger than the recently “quenched” galaxies [@Mancini10]. Whatever the case may be, size measurements of this sample of quiescent galaxies will provide constraints on galaxy evolution scenarios linking the known compact, quiescent systems at high redshift [e.g. @Trujillo06; @vanDokkum08a; @Cimatti08] to the early-type galaxies in the local universe.
We thank the anonymous referee for useful comments and a careful reading of the paper. This paper is based partly on observations obtained with MegaPrime/MegaCam, a joint project of CFHT and CEA/DAPNIA, at the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT), which is operated by the National Research Council (NRC) of Canada, the Institut National des Science de l’Univers of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) of France, and the University of Hawaii. We thank H. Hildebrandt for providing the CARS-reduced CFHT-LS images. Support from NSF grants AST-0449678 and AST-0807974 is gratefully acknowledged.
Appendix A. $UVJ$ Selection of Quiescent Galaxies {#appendix-a.-uvj-selection-of-quiescent-galaxies .unnumbered}
=================================================
In this paper we select galaxies based on their extinction-corrected $U$-$V$ colors. We show here that this selection method is similar to a selection based on the rest-frame $U$-$V$ and $V$-$J$ colors used by @Labbe05 and @Williams09. This alternative color-selection has been shown to cleanly separate quiescent and star-forming galaxies. Two distinct populations exist in the $U$-$V$ versus $V$-$J$ color-space; the red, quiescent galaxies tend to lie in a clump, while the star-forming galaxies follow a well-separated track that extends from blue to red $U$-$V$ colors with increasing amounts of dust extinction.
We applied the same selection method as used in @Williams09 to separate the star forming and quiescent galaxies, independent of the method used in this paper. The resulting sample of massive, quiescent galaxies are very similar, the fraction of quiescent galaxies agree within 5% at all redshifts. In Figure 11a, the massive, quiescent galaxies do indeed cleanly separate from star forming galaxies in the $UVJ$ color-color plot. A few of the quiescent galaxies selected in the $UVJ$ method have large amounts of dust reddening, as seen in Figure 11b by plotting the extinction-corrected $U$-$V$ colors as a function of mass. These blue quiescent galaxies will increase the measured intrinsic scatter at high redshift while making the mean color at these redshifts bluer by $\sim$0.2-0.4 mag.
![The composite rest-frame SED of massive, quiescent galaxies from $z$=0.2 to 2.2, selected based on their $U$-$V$ and $V$-$J$ colors. The reddest and bluest $U$-$V$ quartiles are color-coded as red and blue, and the solid lines are the median best-fit templates as derived from the spectral modeling analysis. The sub-panels in each redshift range are the histograms of ($U$-$V$)’, $U$-$V$ with the slope of the color-magnitude relation removed. The total number of galaxies in each bin is labeled in the top left of each panel. There is an even larger difference between the composite SEDs of the red and blue quartiles at $z\!\sim$2, compared to our more conservative sample in Figure \[SEDs\].](fig13_sm.eps)
We have repeated the analysis as described in §3 for this new sample of quiescent galaxies. In Figure 12, we show that the measured intrinsic scatter of the $UVJ$ sample of quiescent galaxies rises even more steeply at $z\!>$1. These trends in the color scatter imply even shorter characteristic timescales for star formation as well as luminosity-weighted ages that are dominated by star formation close to the end of their star formation histories. This may be due to contamination by star-forming galaxies; whatever the cause, we note that our selection is more conservative
In Figure 13, we show the composite rest-frame SED of the $UVJ$-selected sample of quiescent galaxies, derived using the same method as described in §3.4. Comparing the distribution of colors from the $UVJ$-selection criterion to the histograms in the inset panels of Figure \[K06trends\], we see that the galaxies selected here extend to bluer $U$-$V$ colors and have broader distributions. We also see that the bluest quiescent galaxies from this selection method show stronger rest-frame UV emission and there is a more pronounced clump of blue points that lie above the model around 5000-6000Å in the highest redshift bin. This may be evidence for emission lines in these blue galaxies. Emission lines are generally too weak to affect the SED modeling, although their signal is (just) strong enough to identify in the average, de-redshifted spectrum of star-forming galaxies with the NMBS (Brammer et al. *in prep*). These quiescent galaxies with even bluer colors that enter the sample at $z\!\sim$2 are the the massive galaxies just below our selection limit. Most of these galaxies also have MIPS detections and may therefore have some recent star formation or host AGN. In general, our selection based on the extinction-corrected $U$-$V$ colors is in fact more conservative than a $UVJ$-selection.
In summary, a selection of quiescent galaxies based on their $U$-$V$ and $V$-$J$ colors yields a very similar sample of galaxies. Both methods result in the same fundamental differences between the reddest and bluest quiescent galaxies.
Appendix B. The Effects of Photometric Scatter {#appendix-b.-the-effects-of-photometric-scatter .unnumbered}
==============================================
We consider what the rest-frame SEDs would look like if the scatter in color was in fact due solely to photometric errors of a single age population. We find the median SED for all quiescent galaxies in the highest redshift bin and use this template to derive what the observed flux would be if these galaxies all had the same age but a range of redshifts between $1.8<z<2.2$. Next we perturb the fluxes by increasing factors of the observed error bars and re-measure the rest-frame colors until the scatter in the rest-frame $U$-$V$ color matches our observed scatter of $\sigma_{\mathrm{U-V}}\!\sim$0.15-0.17. The error bars have to be increased by a factor of 8 to yield an observed scatter consistent with our observations.
Although it is doubtful that our photometric errors are underestimated by a factor of 8, we plot the SEDs of all simulated fluxes for a single-age stellar population (black model) with scatter that results from the increased photometric errors in Figure 14 to see if we find similar trends to Figure \[K06SED\]. We plot all simulated fluxes and indicate those galaxies with the reddest $U$-$V$ colors in red and those with the bluest $U$-$V$ colors in blue, exactly as we have done in Figure \[K06SED\]. We see that the median best-fit spectral synthesis model for the bluest quartile does emit slightly more radiation at all wavelengths than the reddest quartile blueward of 7000Å(as we have selected them). Although the models are well-behaved, the important result is that the observed fluxes are incoherent. These simulations show that the trends we observe cannot be the result of photometric errors alone.
Another concern is that the photometric redshifts suffer from both random and systematic errors. To understand the effects of random uncertainties in the photometric redshifts on the composite SEDs, we perturbed the redshifts of all quiescent galaxies in the highest redshift bin by their 68% confidence level uncertainties and re-fit the photometry. Although some scatter is introduced to the SEDs, we still find that the reddest galaxies emit systematically lower flux than the bluest galaxies on the red sequence at all wavelengths $<$7000$\mathrm{\AA}$. Although our results hold strong against random uncertainties in the photometric redshifts, systematic uncertainties may have a more severe effect. Recently, @Kriek09 took a follow-up deep 30-hour spectra of a massive quiescent galaxy and derived a spectroscopic redshift of $z_{\mathrm{spec}}$=2.186. This galaxy was selected from the original sample of 9 quiescent galaxies from @Kriek06, where the spectroscopic redshift with a 6-hour integration was $z_{\mathrm{spec}}$=2.31. The error in $z_{\mathrm{spec}}$ of 0.12 in redshift space shifted the 4000Å break to shorter wavelengths resulting in a continuum shape that appeared to instead have a strong Balmer-break and therefore a younger stellar population. If the photometric redshifts of the blue quiescent galaxies have been systematically under-estimated and the photometric redshifts of the oldest galaxies have been systematically over-estimated, we could falsely produce the spread of ages found in this work. To test how systematic errors would change the results, we assumed that the photometric redshifts of the bluest quartile were all under-estimated by $\Delta z$=0.12 and the reddest quartile were over-estimated by $\Delta z$=0.12 and re-fit the models. For this extreme case, the residuals between the average model of all of the data and the two quartiles overlap in the Balmer/4000Å break region, however the rest-frame UV and rest-frame NIR show clear differences (see Figure 15). If we relax the systematic shifts from $\Delta z$=0.12 to 0.06, the residuals once again show a clear difference over the entire wavelength regime. Although we cannot rule out that systematic effects may significantly affect our results, our photometric redshift errors would need to conspire quite drastically to wash out the fundamental differences between the SEDs of the reddest and bluest galaxies on the red sequence.
Appendix C. The Effects of Template Sets on the Photometric Redshifts and Rest-frame Colors {#appendix-c.-the-effects-of-template-sets-on-the-photometric-redshifts-and-rest-frame-colors .unnumbered}
===========================================================================================
In this section, we briefly discuss how the template sets used to fit photometric redshifts and rest-frame colors can have important systematic effects. The optimized template set used for the EAZY photometric redshift code contains 6 templates, which is large enough to span a broad range of galaxy colors, while minimizing color and redshift degeneracies. The default template set is described in detail in @Brammer08; the set includes 5 templates generated based on the PÉGASE models and calibrated with synthetic photometry from semi-analytic models, as well as an additional young and dusty template added to compensate for the lack of extremely dusty galaxies in semi-analytic models (we call this “Template Set 2” here). “Template Set 1”, which is the template set used in this paper, includes an additional template for a very old galaxy. This old, red template is from the @Maraston05 models, with a @Kroupa01 IMF and solar metallicity for a stellar population that has an age of 12.6 Gyrs.
Figure 16 shows how the additional old (red) template effects both the photometric redshifts measured as well as the $U$-$V$ colors. In the left panel, the difference between the spectroscopic and photometric redshifts is strongly correlated with the difference in the $U$-$V$ colors measured from these respective redshifts. The trend results in a systematic uncertainty in the $U$-$V$ color (as seen by the spread of the $\Delta$($U$-$V$) distribution in the middle panel) of 0.05 magnitudes[^10]. In addition to this systematic uncertainty, there can be a systematic offset if the template set does not span the entire range of colors of the galaxies. In this case, Template Set 2 does not include a red enough template and therefore tends to over-estimate the photometric redshifts of the reddest galaxies (the black histogram in the left panel is offset). Furthermore, this over-estimate of the redshift leads to colors that are too blue (see the middle panel). Finally, if we compare the $U$-$V$ colors as measured from the spectroscopic redshifts and the photometric redshifts with the two template sets, we see that the color distribution is artificially peaked for Template Set 2. In other words, when the template set does not span the full range of galaxy colors, the scatter in color will be significantly under-estimated.
Appendix D. The Effects of Dust and Star Formation on the Composite SEDs {#appendix-d.-the-effects-of-dust-and-star-formation-on-the-composite-seds .unnumbered}
========================================================================
In §3.4, we concluded that the trends of spectral shape with the $U$-$V$ colors were mainly due to the spread in age of the quiescent galaxies. However, if the reddest galaxies are simply dustier versions of the bluest galaxies, we also might expect similar trends to result. Here we explore if the features we see in the composite SEDs in Figure \[SEDs\] result not because the reddest quartile is older than the bluest quartile, but rather because the reddest galaxies are dustier. To test this, we take the smoothed best-fit model to the bluest quartile at $1.8<z<2.2$ and apply the @Calzetti00 dust extinction law to the spectrum with increasing amounts of dust to see if we can recover the shape of the reddest composite spectrum. From Figure 17, we see that for values of $A_{V}\!\sim$1.0 mag match the data blueward of 0.4$\mu$m, $A_{V}\!\sim$0.5 mag matches the slope between $\sim$0.4-0.7$\mu$m and values of $A_{V}\!\sim$0.2 mag agree with the IRAC data. There is no single extinction that is consistent over the full SED. We know that the red quiescent galaxies at $z\!>$1.5 are $\sim$0.2 magnitudes dustier on average than the blue quiescent galaxies, however it does not appear that the trends we see in Figure \[SEDs\] can be explained by dust alone. With that said, we cannot rule out the possibility that dust has a second order effect on the trends of spectral shape with age.
Along the same lines, we suspect that some of these quiescent galaxies likely have ongoing star formation. The reddest quiescent galaxies probably have no recent star formation, whereas the bluest galaxies may have a more complicated star formation history that includes a recent burst of star formation. To understand how ongoing star-formation would effect the spectral shapes, we add Gaussian smoothed Maraston (2005) models with $\tau$=0.1 Gyr, $Z_{\odot}$, and a Kroupa (2001) IMF for a range of ages from 1 Myr to 0.4 Gyr to the composite SED of the reddest quartile. Recent star formation will have the largest contribution in the rest-frame UV, so we normalize these spectra to the observed flux of the bluest quartile composite SED at 0.2$\mu$m. We add a 0.001, 0.01, 0.1 and 0.4 Gyr stellar population to the reddest quartile composite spectrum and re-normalize the spectrum at 7000$\mathrm{\AA}$. In Figure 18, we see that Balmer/4000$\mathrm{\AA}$-break region remains effectively unchanged regardless of the age of the young component we add to the red composite SED, while the slope in the rest-frame UV steadily rises blueward of $\sim$0.3$\mu$m. From this simple analysis, we conclude that the difference between the blue and red composite SEDs cannot be the result of ongoing star formation in a subset of the quiescent galaxies. This does not mean that the quiescent galaxies have no ongoing star formation, rather that the trends we see in Figure \[SEDs\] are not likely caused by more complex star formation histories.
Appendix E. The Effects of Metallicity Variations on the Intrinsic $U$-$V$ Scatter {#appendix-e.-the-effects-of-metallicity-variations-on-the-intrinsic-u-v-scatter .unnumbered}
==================================================================================
In this paper, we assume that $U$-$V$ color scatter and variations in SED shapes are due to age variations between galaxies. However, metallicity variations could also contribute to the measured intrinsic scatter in $U$-$V$ color. Here we quantify this effect by using the @Maraston05 models to predict how the $U$-$V$ scatter should evolve with redshift if the scatter is caused solely by metallicity variations (and not a spread in age). In the left panel of Figure \[metal\], we see that red $U$-$V$ colors result from both older stellar populations and higher metallicities. Furthermore, the scatter in metallicity depends on the age of the stellar population. For ages $\gtrsim\!3$ Gyr, the scatter in $U$-$V$ due to metallicity variations is roughly constant, with a smaller scatter for ages $\lesssim$3 Gyr. The relation between $U$-$V$ and metallicity is shown in the middle panel of Figure \[metal\], and is roughly linear with an age-dependent slope $\alpha$. To characterize how the slope of the color-metallicity relation evolves with the age of the stellar population, we fit the $U$-$V$ color for 4 metallicities with a linear function and plot the slope as a function of the age in the right panel of Figure \[metal\].
Given the evolution of the slope of the color-metallicity relation, we can predict how we expect the scatter in $U$-$V$ to evolve with redshift for a given scatter in metallicity. We first assume the age of the stellar population at $z$=0, which determines the slope of the color-metallicity relation from the right panel of Figure \[metal\]. We will further assume that $\sigma_{\mathrm{U-V}}=0.03$ at $z=0$, as determined in the Coma cluster [@Bower92]. Given $\alpha$ and the scatter in $U$-$V$ at $z=0$, we can predict the scatter in $U$-$V$ due to $\log Z/Z_{\odot}$,
$$\sigma_{\mathrm{U-V}}(z)=\frac{\sigma_{\mathrm{U-V}}(z=0)\cdot\alpha(z=0)}{\alpha(z)}$$
The scatter due to metallicity, $\sigma_{\mathrm{U-V}}(z=0)\cdot\alpha(z=0)$, is constant for a given age. However, the slope $\alpha$($z$) will change as the population evolves, leading to an evolving color scatter. In Figure \[metal2\], we find that the scatter in $U$-$V$ due to metallicity variations alone will stay roughly constant for the oldest stellar populations and eventually decrease. This trend in $\sigma_{\mathrm{U-V}}$ is opposite to the measured evolution of the intrinsic scatter in $U$-$V$ with redshift. We therefore expect that metallicity variations will not have a large effect on this work.
![The intrinsic scatter in $U$-$V$ as a function of redshift as measured in clusters [@Bower92; @vanDokkum08b], as well as in this work. We compare the measured values to the expected evolution in $\sigma_{\mathrm{U-V}}$ if the color scatter is due solely to metallicity variations for a single aged stellar population. Metallicity variations will increase the scatter in $U$-$V$ for older ages and therefore lower redshifts, opposite to the trends found in this work.[]{data-label="metal2"}](fig20_sm.eps)
[^1]: http://www.cfht.hawaii.edu/Science/CFHTLS/
[^2]: Through visual inspections of the residual IRAC images (after subtracting the modeled K-detected objects), we estimate that flux contributions from undetected K-band sources may influence the IRAC photometry for less than 5% of the entire quiescent sample studied in this work at a level greater than the formal error bars.
[^3]: We note that different dust attenuation laws have little effect on quiescent galaxies [see @Muzzin09].
[^4]: 24 $\mu$m fluxes from $Spitzer$-MIPS images provided by the S-COSMOS and FIDEL surveys, see @Brammer09 for a full description.
[^5]: In Appendix B, we address the possible concern that our photometric errors have been greatly underestimated.
[^6]: We do not include the @Ruhland09 data in Figure \[scatter\] as that study probes a different mass range.
[^7]: At high $z$, young early-type galaxies will drop out of samples creating a biased subset of the low $z$ sample that contains only the oldest progenitors of today’s early-types. This effect is known as “progenitor bias” and leads to an underestimate of the observed redshift evolution of the mean luminosity and colors of early-types.
[^8]: http://www.astro.yale.edu/dokkum/old.index.html
[^9]: The parameter $\Delta$t in van Dokkum & Franx 2001 is set to zero, as we are not concerned with the time when a galaxy is morphologically identified as early-type.
[^10]: We note that the rest-frame $U$-$V$ color accuracy has a weak dependence on mass and luminosity evolution, $<$0.02 magnitudes.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We prove that any complete surface with constant mean curvature in a homogeneous space ${\mathbb{E}}(\kappa,\tau)$ which is transversal to the vertical Killing vector field is, in fact, a vertical graph. As a consequence we get that any orientable, parabolic, complete, immersed surface with constant mean curvature $H$ in ${\mathbb{E}}(\kappa,\tau)$ (different from a horizontal slice in ${\mathbb{S}}^2\times{\mathbb{R}}$) is either a vertical cylinder or a vertical graph (in both cases, it must be $4H^2+\kappa\leq0$).'
address: |
Departamento de Geometría y Topología\
Universidad de Granada\
18071 Granada, Spain
author:
- 'José M. Manzano'
- 'M. Magdalena Rodríguez'
title: 'On complete constant mean curvature vertical multigraphs in ${\mathbb{E}}(\kappa,\tau)$'
---
Introduction
============
The classical theory of constant mean curvature surfaces in $3$-manifolds is still an active field of research nowadays. Among all ambient $3$-manifolds, the most studied subclass consists of those simply-connected with constant sectional curvature, the so-called *space forms* (${\mathbb{R}}^3$, ${\mathbb{S}}^3$ or ${\mathbb{H}}^3$). Their isometry group has dimension $6$ and acts transitively on their tangent bundle. Apart from the space forms, the most symmetric ones are those simply-connected whose isometry group has dimension $4$. They are usually denoted by ${\mathbb{E}}(\kappa,\tau)$, where $\kappa,\tau\in{\mathbb{R}}$ satisfy $\kappa-4\tau^2\neq0$, and include the Riemannian product manifolds ${\mathbb{S}}^2(\kappa)\times{\mathbb{R}}$ and ${\mathbb{H}}^2(\kappa)\times{\mathbb{R}}$ (when $\tau=0$), the Heisenberg space Nil$_3$ (for $\kappa=0$), the universal cover $\widetilde{\mbox{SL}_2}({\mathbb{R}})$ of the special linear group SL$_2({\mathbb{R}})$ endowed with some special left-invariant metrics (for $\kappa<0$ and $\tau \neq 0$), and the Berger spheres (for $\kappa>0$ and $\tau \neq
0$). See [@Daniel07] for more details.
The spaces ${\mathbb{E}}(\kappa,\tau)$ are characterized by admitting a Riemannian submersion $\pi:{\mathbb{E}}(\kappa,\tau)\to{\mathbb{M}}^2(\kappa)$ with constant bundle curvature $\tau$, where ${\mathbb{M}}^2(\kappa)$ stands for the simply-connected Riemannian surface with constant curvature $\kappa$, such that the fibers of $\pi$ are the integral curves of a unit Killing vector field in ${\mathbb{E}}(\kappa,\tau)$ (see [@man12]). In what follows, we will refer to this field as the *vertical* Killing vector field and it will be denoted by $\xi$.
In the theory of constant mean curvature surfaces ($H$-surfaces in the sequel) in ${\mathbb{E}}(\kappa,\tau)$, vertical multigraphs play an important role. A surface $\Sigma$ immersed in ${\mathbb{E}}(\kappa,\tau)$ is said to be a *vertical multigraph* if the following equivalent conditions hold:
1. $\Sigma$ is transversal to the vertical Killing vector field $\xi$.
2. The angle function $\nu=\langle N,\xi\rangle$ has no zeros in $\Sigma$, where $N$ is a global unit normal vector field of $\Sigma$.
3. The projection $\pi_{|\Sigma}:\Sigma\to{\mathbb{M}}^2(\kappa)$ is a local diffeomorphism.
The first two conditions are trivially equivalent, whereas the third one follows from the fact that the absolute value of the Jacobian of $\pi_{|\Sigma}$ equals $|\nu|$.
The need of knowing whether a vertical $H$-multigraph is or not embedded often arises in the study of such surfaces. In this paper we solve this problem by proving that they are always *vertical graphs* (i.e., they intersect at most once each integral curve of $\xi$), and in particular embedded, when we additionally assume that the vertical $H$-multigraph is complete. (We observe that the completeness asumption is needed: A counterexample is given, for example, by the helicoid of ${\mathbb{H}}^2\times{\mathbb{R}}$ constructed by Nelli and Rosenberg in [@NR02] minus a neighborhood of its axis.) In this line, we recall the following known results:
- Hauswirth, Rosenberg and Spruck proved a half-space theorem for properly embedded $\frac{1}{2}$-surfaces in ${\mathbb{H}}^2\times{\mathbb{R}}$ and concluded that a complete vertical $\frac{1}{2}$-multigraph in ${\mathbb{H}}^2\times{\mathbb{R}}$ is always an entire vertical graph (see [@HRS]), i.e., it intersects exactly once each integral curve of $\xi$. Later on, by using another halfspace theorem for properly immersed surfaces in ${\mathrm{Nil}}_3$, Daniel and Hauswirth [@dh1] proved the same result for minimal vertical multigraphs in ${\mathrm{Nil}}_3$. Finally, using this theorem by Daniel and Hauswirth, the classification theorem by Fernández and Mira in [@fm1] and the Daniel correspondence [@Daniel07], it is possible to extend the aforementioned results to prove that a complete vertical $H$-multigraph in ${\mathbb{E}}(\kappa,\tau)$ satisfying $4H^2+\kappa=0$ is an entire vertical graph (see also Corollary 4.6.3 in [@kias] for a complete reference).
- Espinar and Rosenberg proved in [@ER09] that there are no complete vertical H-multigraphs in ${\mathbb{H}}^2\times{\mathbb{R}}$ for $H>\frac{1}{2}$. In a joint work with Joaquín Pérez (see the proof of Theorem 2 in [@MaPR]), the authors proved using a different approach that the only complete vertical $H$-multigraphs in ${\mathbb{E}}(\kappa,\tau)$ with $4H^2+\kappa>0$ are the horizontal slices ${\mathbb{S}}^2(\kappa)\times\{t_0\}$ in ${\mathbb{S}}^2(\kappa)\times{\mathbb{R}}$, for any $\kappa>0$ (and $\tau=H=0$). The latter result has also been proved in [@P].
To obtain the general result stated below, it only remains to study the case $4H^2+\kappa<0$. We highlight that the geometry of an $H$-surface in the homogeneous spaces ${\mathbb{E}}(\kappa,\tau)$ varies essentially depending on the sign of $4H^2+\kappa$. For instance, it is known that constant mean curvature spheres exist if, and only if, $4H^2+\kappa>0$; see Theorem 2.5.3 in [@kias].
\[teor:grafos-multigrafos\] Let $\Sigma$ be a complete vertical $H$-multigraph in ${\mathbb{E}}(\kappa,\tau)$. Then, one of the following statements hold:
1. ${\mathbb{E}}(\kappa,\tau)={\mathbb{S}}^2(\kappa)\times{\mathbb{R}}$, $H=0$ and $\Sigma={\mathbb{S}}^2(\kappa)\times\{t_0\}$, for some $t_0\in{\mathbb{R}}$.
2. $4H^2+\kappa\leq 0$ and $\Sigma$ is a vertical graph. Moreover, if the equality holds then the graph is entire.
We remark that the condition $4H^2+\kappa=0$ in Theorem \[teor:grafos-multigrafos\] is not necessary in order to obtain entire vertical $H$-graphs: Besides horizontal slices, other entire minimal vertical graphs in ${\mathbb{H}}^2\times{\mathbb{R}}$ have been constructed by Nelli and Rosenberg in [@NR02], by Collin and Rosenberg in [@CR10] and by Mazet, Rosenberg and the second author in [@MRR11]. The reader can also find some examples of rotationally invariant entire vertical $H$-graphs in ${\mathbb{H}}^2\times{\mathbb{R}}$ for any $0<H\leq \frac12$ in [@NR06]. We also emphasize that there exist many complete vertical $H$-graphs in ${\mathbb{H}}^2\times{\mathbb{R}}$ which are not entire:
- On the one hand, Sa Earp [@SE] and Abresch gave a explicit complete minimal vertical graph defined on half a hyperbolic plane. In [@CR10; @MRR11; @Rod], some complete minimal examples in ${\mathbb{H}}^2\times{\mathbb{R}}$ (which are vertical graphs over simply connected domains bounded by –possibly infinitely many– complete geodesics where the graph has non-bounded boundary data, and/or finitely many arcs at the infinite boundary of ${\mathbb{H}}^2$) are given. Melo constructed in [@Melo] minimal examples in $\widetilde{\mbox{SL}_2}({\mathbb{R}})$ similar to those in [@CR10].
- On the other hand, Folha and Melo obtained in [@FoM10] vertical $H$-graphs in ${\mathbb{H}}^2\times{\mathbb{R}}$, with $0<H<\frac12$, over simply-connected domains bounded by an even number of curves of geodesic curvature $\pm 2H$ (disposed alternately) over which the graphs go to $\pm\infty$.
Let us now explain a consequence of Theorem \[teor:grafos-multigrafos\]. We consider the [*stability operator*]{} of a two-sided $H$-surface immersed in ${\mathbb{E}}(\kappa,\tau)$, given by $$\label{eq:stab}
L=\Delta+|A|^2+\mbox{Ric}(N),$$ where $\Delta$ stands for the Laplacian with respect to the induced metric on $\Sigma$, and $A$ and $N$ denote respectively the shape operator and a unit normal vector field of $\Sigma$. The surface $\Sigma$ is said to be [*stable*]{} when $-L$ is a non-negative operator (see [@mpr19] for more details on stable $H$-surfaces). Rosenberg proved in [@R06] the non-existence of stable $H$-surfaces in ${\mathbb{E}}(\kappa,\tau)$ provided that $3H^2+\kappa>\tau^2$, other than ${\mathbb{S}}^2(\kappa)\times\{t_0\}$ in ${\mathbb{S}}^2(\kappa)\times{\mathbb{R}}$. It is conjectured that the optimal condition for such non-existence result is $4H^2+\kappa>0$. In a joint work with Pérez [@MaPR], the authors slightly improve Rosenberg’s bound in the general case and obtain the expected bound under the additional assumption of parabolicity. We recall that a Riemannnian manifold $\Sigma$ is said to be [ *parabolic*]{} when the only positive superharmonic functions defined on $M$ are the constant functions. As a direct consequence of Theorem \[teor:grafos-multigrafos\] above and Theorem 2 in [@MaPR], we get the following nice classification result:
\[cor:stable\] Let $\Sigma$ be an orientable, parabolic, complete, stable $H$-surface in ${\mathbb{E}}(\kappa,\tau)$. Then, one of the following statements hold:
1. ${\mathbb{E}}(\kappa,\tau)={\mathbb{S}}^2(\kappa)\times{\mathbb{R}}$, $H=0$ and $\Sigma={\mathbb{S}}^2(\kappa)\times\{t_0\}$, for some $t_0\in{\mathbb{R}}$.
2. $4H^2+\kappa\leq 0$ and $\Sigma$ is either a vertical graph or a vertical cylinder over a complete curve of geodesic curvature $2H$ in ${\mathbb{M}}^2(\kappa)$.
Preliminaries
=============
From now on, $\Sigma$ will denote a complete vertical $H$-multigraph in ${\mathbb{E}}(\kappa,\tau)$, with $4H^2+\kappa<0$. Let us remark that the latter condition implies $\kappa<0$, so ${\mathbb{E}}(\kappa,\tau)$ admits a fibration over ${\mathbb{H}}^2(\kappa)$. By applying a convenient homothety in the metric, there is no loss of generality in supposing that $\kappa=-1$. Hence, we can consider the disk $\mathbb
D(2)=\{(x,y)\in{\mathbb{R}}^2:x^2+y^2<4\}$ and the model ${\mathbb{E}}(-1,\tau)=\mathbb
D(2)\times{\mathbb{R}}$, endowed with the Riemannian metric $${\,\mathrm{d}}s^2=\lambda^2({\,\mathrm{d}}x^2+{\,\mathrm{d}}y^2)+({\,\mathrm{d}}z+\tau\lambda (y{\,\mathrm{d}}x-x{\,\mathrm{d}}y))^2,$$ where $\lambda:\mathbb D(2)\to{\mathbb{R}}$ is given by $\lambda(x,y)=\bigl(1-\tfrac{1}{4}(x^2+y^2)\bigr)^{-1}$. In this model, the Riemannian fibration is nothing but $\pi:{\mathbb{E}}(-1,\tau)\to{\mathbb{H}}^2$, $\pi(x,y,z)=(x,y)$, when we identify ${\mathbb{H}}^2\equiv(\mathbb D(2),\lambda^2({\,\mathrm{d}}x^2+{\,\mathrm{d}}y)^2)$.
Given an open set $\Omega\subset{\mathbb{H}}^2$ and a function $u\in
C^\infty(\Omega)$, the graph associated to $u$ is defined as the surface parametrized by $$F_u:\Omega\to{\mathbb{E}}(-1,\tau),\quad F_u(x,y)=(x,y,u(x,y)).$$
Let us also fix the following notation, for any $R>0$:
- Given $x_0\in{\mathbb{H}}^2$, we denote by $B(x_0,R)$ the ball in ${\mathbb{H}}^2$ of center $x_0$ and radius $R$.
- Given $p_0\in\Sigma$, we denote by $B_\Sigma(p_0,R)$ the intrinsic ball in $\Sigma$ of center $p_0$ and radius $R$.
The proof of Theorem \[teor:grafos-multigrafos\] relies on some technical results given originally by Hauswirth, Rosenberg and Spruck in [@HRS]. Although they treat the case $H=\frac{1}{2}$ in ${\mathbb{H}}^2\times{\mathbb{R}}$, their arguments can be directly generalized to $H$-surfaces in ${\mathbb{E}}(\kappa,\tau)$ with $4H^2+\kappa\leq 0$, giving rise to Lemma \[lema:asintotico2\] below.
Take $x_0\in{\mathbb{H}}^2$ and $R>0$ such that there exists $u\in
C^\infty(B(x_0,R))$ with $F_u(B(x_0,R))\subset\Sigma$. (As $\pi_{|\Sigma}$ is a local diffeomorphism, this can be done for any $x_0\in\pi(\Sigma)$.) We also fix a unit normal vector field $N$ of $\Sigma$ so that the angle function $\nu=\langle N,\xi\rangle$ is positive. We observe that $\nu$ lies in the kernel of the stability operator of $\Sigma$, defined in , see [@bce1]. Since $\nu$ has no zeros, we deduce by a theorem given by Fischer-Colbrie [@fi1] (see Lemma 2.1 in [@mpr19]) that $\Sigma$ stable. This is an important fact in the proof of Lemma \[lema:asintotico2\].
Suppose that $\hat x\in\partial B(x_0,R)$ satisfies that $u$ cannot be extended to any neighborhood of $\hat x$ in ${\mathbb{H}}^2$ as a vertical $H$-graph. Given a sequence $\{x_n\}\subset B(x_0,R)$ converging to $\hat x$ and calling $p_n=F_u(x_n)$, the arguments in [@HRS] can be extended to show that the sequence of surfaces $\{\Sigma_n\}$ (where $\Sigma_n$ results from translating $\Sigma$ vertically so that $p_n$ is at height zero), converges to a vertical cylinder $\pi^{-1}(\Gamma)$, for a curve $\Gamma\subset{\mathbb{H}}^2$ of constant geodesic curvature $2H$ or $-2H$ which is tangent to $\partial
B(x_0,R)$ at $\hat x$. Note that the condition $4H^2-1<0$ implies that $\Gamma$ is non-compact.
Given $\delta>0$, we denote by $N_\delta(\Gamma)$ the open neighborhood of $\Gamma$ in ${\mathbb{H}}^2$ of radius $\delta$. Moreover, given $x\in{\mathbb{H}}^2{\smallsetminus}\Gamma$, we call $N_\delta(\Gamma,x)=N_\delta(\Gamma)\cap U$, where $U$ is the connected component of ${\mathbb{H}}^2{\smallsetminus}\Gamma$ containing $x$. By coherence, we denote $U=N_\infty(\Gamma,x)$.
\[lema:asintotico2\] In the setting above, suppose that $\hat x\in\partial B(x_0,R)$ satisfies that $u$ cannot be extended to any neighborhood of $\hat
x$ in ${\mathbb{H}}^2$ as a vertical $H$-graph. Then, there exist $\delta>0$ and a complete curve $\Gamma\subset{\mathbb{H}}^2$ of constant geodesic curvature $2H$ or $-2H$, tangent to $\partial B(x_0,R)$ at $\hat x$, such that $u$ extends as a vertical $H$-graph to $B(x_0,R)\cup
N_\delta(\Gamma,x_0)$ with infinite constant boundary values along $\Gamma$.
\[obse:signo-infinito\] In our study, we will always find a dichotomy between geodesic curvature $2H$ or $-2H$, as well as boundary values $+\infty$ or $-\infty$. Although, the arguments below do not depend on these signs, it is worth saying something about the relation between them in order to describe the complete vertical graphs. As mentioned above, it can be shown that the $H$-multigraphs $\Sigma_n$ converge uniformly on compact subsets to a vertical cylinder and we are considering the unit normal vector field of $\Sigma$ which points upwards. By analyzing the normals of $\Gamma$ in ${\mathbb{H}}^2$ and of $\pi^{-1}(\Gamma)$ in ${\mathbb{E}}(-1,\tau)$, it is not difficult to realize that if $u$ tends to $+\infty$ (resp. $-\infty$) along $\Gamma$, the geodesic curvature of $\Gamma$ will be $2H$ (resp. $-2H$) with respect to the normal vector pointing to the domain of definition of the graph. This fact was proved for minimal surfaces in ${\mathbb{H}}^2\times{\mathbb{R}}$ by Nelli and Rosenberg in [@NR02]; for $H$-surfaces in ${\mathbb{H}}^2\times{\mathbb{R}}$, for $0<H\leq 1/2$, by Hauswirth, Rosenberg and Spruck in [@HRS09]; and for minimal surfaces in $\widetilde{\mathrm{SL}_2}({\mathbb{R}})$ by Younes in [@Younes].
The proof of Theorem \[teor:grafos-multigrafos\]
================================================
As explained above, supposed that $\Sigma$ is a complete vertical $H$-multigraph in ${\mathbb{E}}(-1,\tau)$ with $0\leq H<\frac12$, we will show that $\Sigma$ is a vertical graph. The proof relies on the following result.
\[prop\] Let $\Sigma$ be a complete vertical $H$-multigraph in ${\mathbb{E}}(-1,\tau)$. Given $p\in\Sigma$ and $R>0$, there exist an open set $\Omega\subseteq{\mathbb{H}}^2$ and a function $u\in C^\infty(\Omega)$ such that $B_\Sigma(p,R)\subseteq F_u(\Omega)$.
Note that the fact that $\Sigma$ is indeed a graph follows from Proposition \[prop\]: Reasoning by contradiction, if there existed $p,q\in\Sigma$, $p\neq q$, which project by $\pi:{\mathbb{E}}(-1,\tau)\to{\mathbb{H}}^2$ on the same point, then we could take $R$ bigger than the intrinsic distance from $p$ to $q$ to reach a contradiction. Thus, the rest of this section will be devoted to prove Proposition \[prop\].
From now on, we fix a point $p\in\Sigma$ and denote $x_0=\pi(p)$. The following definition will be useful in the sequel.
We say that $\Omega\subset{\mathbb{H}}^2$ is [*admissible*]{} if it is a connected open set containing $x_0$ for which there exists $u\in
C^\infty(\Omega)$ such that $F_u(\Omega)\subset\Sigma$ and $F_u(x_0)=p$.
If $\Omega\subset{\mathbb{H}}^2$ is admissible, then the function $u$ in the definition above is unique, and we will call it the function *associated* to $\Omega$. The technique we will use to prove Proposition \[prop\] consists of enlarging gradually an initial admissible domain until it eventually contains the projection of an arbitrarily large intrinsic ball.
As $\nu>0$, there exists a neighborhood of $p$ in $\Sigma$ which projects one-to-one to a ball $B(x_0,\rho)$, for some $\rho>0$. In other words, there exists $\rho>0$ such that $B(x_0,\rho)$ is admissible. Let us consider $$\label{eqn:multigrafo-radio-inicial}
R_0=\sup\{\rho>0:B(x_0,\rho)\text{ is admissible}\}.$$ If $R_0=+\infty$, Proposition \[prop\] follows trivially for such a point $p$, so we assume $R_0<+\infty$. This implies that $B(x_0,R_0)$ is a *maximal admissible ball*, and it will play the role of our initial domain.
\[lem1\] Let $\Omega$ an admissible domain such that $\partial\Omega$ is a piecewise $C^2$-embedded curve. Suppose that there exists $\hat x$ in a regular arc of $\partial\Omega$ such that $\Omega$ cannot be extended as an admissible domain to any neighborhood of $\hat
x$. Then:
- The geodesic curvature of $\partial\Omega$ at $\hat
x$ with respect to its inner normal vector is at least $-2H$.
- There exists a curve $\Gamma\subset{\mathbb{H}}^2$ with constant geodesic curvature $2H$ or $-2H$, tangent to $\partial\Omega$ at $\hat x$, and there exist $\delta>0$, $y\in\Omega$ and a function $v\in C^\infty(N_\delta(\Gamma,y))$ such that:
- The function $v$ has constant boundary values $+\infty$ or $-\infty$ along $\Gamma$.
- Given $r>0$, we have $U_r=N_\delta(\Gamma,y)\cap B(\hat
x,r)\cap\Omega\neq\emptyset$ and there exists $r_0>0$ such that $u=v$ in $U_r$ for $0<r<r_0$.
Let us consider a geodesic ball $B(y,\rho)\subset{\mathbb{H}}^2$ contained in $\Omega$ and tangent to $\partial\Omega$ at $\hat x$. Lemma \[lema:asintotico2\] guarantees the existence of a curve $\Gamma\subset{\mathbb{H}}^2$ with constant geodesic curvature $2H$ or $-2H$, tangent to $B(y,\rho)$ at $\hat x$, and $\delta>0$ such that the $H$-graph over $B(y,\rho)$ can be extended to an $H$-graph over $B(y,\rho)\cup
N_\delta(\Gamma,y)$. Let us define $v$ as the restriction of such an extension to $N_\delta(\Gamma,y)$. It can be easily shown that $\Gamma$, $\delta$, $y$ and $v$ satisfy the conditions in item ii). The uniqueness of prolongation ensures that $\Omega$ must be contained in $N_\infty(\Gamma,y)$, from where the estimation for the geodesic curvature of $\partial\Omega$ given in item i) follows.
We will prove (see Lemma \[lem2\] for $R=R_0$ and $\mathcal
C=\emptyset$) that the set of points in $\partial B(x_0,R_0)$ such that $u$ cannot be extended to any neighborhood of them as a vertical $H$-graph is finite. So we can denote them as $x_1,\ldots,x_r$. Lemma \[lem1\] guarantees that, given $j\in\{1,\ldots,r\}$, there exist $\delta_j>0$ and a curve $\Gamma_j\subset\mathbb{H}^2$ of constant geodesic curvature $2H$ or $-2H$ which is tangent to $\partial B(x_0,R_0)$ at $x_j$, such that $u$ can be extended to $B(x_0,R_0)\cup N_{\delta_j}(\Gamma_j,x_0)$, for some $\delta_j>0$. The next step in the proof of Proposition \[prop\] will consist of showing that the curves $\Gamma_1,\ldots,\Gamma_r$ are disjoint. Then we will be able to extend the initial ball $B(x_0,R_0)$ to a new admissible domain $\Omega=B(x_0,R_0)\cup(\cup_{j=1}^rN_\delta(\Gamma_j,x_0))$, for some $\delta\leq \min\{\delta_j :j=1,\dots, r\}$. The function associated to such $\Omega$ will have boundary values $+\infty$ or $-\infty$ along each of the $\Gamma_j$ (depending on the sign of its geodesic curvature). Therefore, for a further extension of $\Omega$ we will work in $\cap_{j=1}^rN_\infty(\Gamma_j,x_0)$, i.e., we will extend $\Omega$ in the direction of $\partial\Omega\cap\partial B(x_0,R_0)$. As this process will be iterated, we describe a general situation for the extension procedure.
\[defi:posicion-general\] Let $\mathcal C$ be a finite family of curves in ${\mathbb{H}}^2$, each one with constant geodesic curvature $2H$ or $-2H$. We will say that $\mathcal C$ is [*in general position*]{} for some radius $R>0$ when the following three conditions are satisfied:
1. Each $\Gamma\in\mathcal C$ intersects the closed ball $\overline B(x_0,R)$ and $x_0\not\in\Gamma$.
2. $\partial\Omega_{\mathcal C}\cap\Gamma\neq\emptyset$ for every $\Gamma\in\mathcal C$, where $$\label{OmegaC}
\Omega_{\mathcal{C}}=B(x_0,R)\cap(\cap_{\Gamma\in\mathcal C}
N_\infty(\Gamma,x_0)).$$
3. No intersection point of curves in $\mathcal C$ lies on $\overline B(x_0,R)$.
(We recall that $N_\infty(\Gamma,x_0)$ is the open connected component of ${\mathbb{H}}^2{\smallsetminus}\Gamma$ containing $x_0$.) It is clear that the family of curves $\{\Gamma_1,\ldots,\Gamma_r\}$ in the discussion above is in general position for the radius $R_0$. This condition will be preserved under the successive steps for enlarging the admissible domain. The next lemma gives some information about a family of curves in general position.
![Three families of four curves in ${\mathbb{H}}^2$. The first one is in general position with respect to the shaded ball and the domain $\Omega_{\mathcal C}$ associated to this family has been also shaded in a darker grey. On the contrary, the other two families are not in general position: conditions (a) and (c) in the definition fail for the second one, whereas condition (b) does not hold for the third one.[]{data-label="fig:posicion-general"}](posicion-general.pdf)
\[lem3\] Let $\mathcal C$ be a finite family of curves in general position for a radius $R>0$. Suppose that $\Omega_{\mathcal C}$, defined by \[OmegaC\], is an admissible domain and that, for any $\Gamma\in\mathcal C$ there exists a vertical $H$-graph $v$ over $N_\delta(\Gamma,x_0)$, for some $\delta>0$, with constant infinite boundary values along $\Gamma$, which coincides with the function $u$ associated to $\Omega_{\mathcal C}$ on $\Omega_{\mathcal C}\cap
N_\delta(\Gamma,x_0)$. Then:
1. Any two curves in $\mathcal C$ are disjoint.
2. There exists $\delta'>0$ so that $\Omega_{\mathcal
C}\cup(\cup_{\Gamma\in\mathcal C}N_{\delta'}(\Gamma,x_0))$ is admissible.
Reasoning by contradiction, let us suppose that there exists a point $\widetilde x\in\Gamma_1\cap\Gamma_2$ for some $\Gamma_1,\Gamma_2\in\mathcal C$. Condition c) in Definition \[defi:posicion-general\] tells us that $\widetilde
x\not\in\overline B(x_0,R)$. We can take a continuous family $\{D_t\}_{t\in[0,\ell)}$ of geodesic balls in ${\mathbb{H}}^2$ satisfying the following three conditions:
1. $D_0\subset B(x_0,R)$.
2. $\partial D_t$ is tangent to $\Gamma_1$ and $\Gamma_2$, for any $t\in[0,\ell)$.
3. The radius of $D_t$ strictly decreases with respect to $t$, and $D_t$ converges to the point $\widetilde x$ when $t\to\ell$.
Let us call, respectively, $x_1$ and $x_2$ the points in $\Gamma_1$ and $\Gamma_2$ which are closest to $x_0$. Denote by $T$ an open triangle with vertices $\widetilde x$, $x_1$ and $x_2$, which has two sides lying on $\Gamma_1$ and $\Gamma_2$ and the third one is a curve interior to $\Omega_{\mathcal C}$ joining $x_1$ and $x_2$. Let us denote by $\Lambda_t\subset \partial D_t$ the intersection of $\Omega_{\mathcal C}\cup T$ with the longest of the two curves in which $\partial D_t$ is divided by $\Gamma_1$ and $\Gamma_2$. Then $\Omega_{\mathcal C}\cup T=\Omega_{\mathcal C}\cup (\cup_{[0,\ell)}
\Lambda_t)$ (see figure \[fig:barrer-triangulo\]).
![Left: Three curves in general position, two of which intersect at $\widetilde x\not\in\overline
B(x_0,R)$. Right: $\Omega_{\mathcal C}\cup T$ have been magnified and some of the curves $\Lambda_t$ which cover $T$ up to $\widetilde x$ are shown.[]{data-label="fig:barrer-triangulo"}](barrer-triangulo.pdf)
Let $r\in[0,\ell]$ be the supreme of the values of $t\in[0,\ell)$ for which the function $u$ associated to $\Omega_{\mathcal C}$ can be extended as an $H$-graph on $\Omega_{\mathcal
C}\cup(\cup_{s\in[0,t]}\Lambda_s)$. Note that $r>0$ since the graph can be extended to $\Omega_{\mathcal C}\cup
N_\varepsilon(\Gamma_i,x_0)$, for $i\in\{1,2\}$ and some $\varepsilon>0$, and the curves $\Lambda_s$ lie on the union of these two open sets for small values of $s$. Moreover, it must be $r=\ell$: Otherwise there would exist a point in $\Lambda_r$ such that $u$ cannot be extended to any neighborhood of it as an $H$-graph. But $\Lambda_r$ has constant geodesic curvature smaller than $-1<-2H$ with respect to the normal pointing to $\Omega_{\mathcal C}\cup(\cup_{s\in[0,r]}\Lambda_s)$, contradicting Lemma \[lem1\].
Hence we have proved that $\Omega_1=\Omega_{\mathcal C}\cup T$ is admissible, and the extension $u_1$ of $u$ over $\Omega_1$ has non-bounded values in the part of $\partial\Omega_1$ lying on $\Gamma_1\cup\Gamma_2$. Nonetheless, the graph $u$ can also be extended to $u_2$ defined over $\Omega_2=\Omega_{\mathcal C}\cup
N_\varepsilon(\Gamma_1,x_0)$. Thus $u_1=u_2$ in $\Omega_1\cap\Omega_2$, by uniqueness of the analytic prolongation. This is a contradiction because $u_2$ has bounded values in $\Gamma_2\cap
N_\varepsilon(\Gamma_1,x_0)\subset\partial(\Omega_1\cap\Omega_2)$ whereas $u_1$ does not. Such a contradiction proves a). Item b) also follows from the previous argument.
Let us now prove that, apart from the curves along which the graph takes infinite boundary values, the number of points which do not admit an extension to any neighborhood of them is finite at any step of the extension procedure.
\[lem2\] Let $\mathcal C$ be a finite family of curves in general position for some radius $R>0$ and suppose that $\Omega_{\mathcal C}$ is admissible. Then the set $A(R)$ of points in $\partial\Omega_{\mathcal C}\cap\partial B(x_0,R)$ such that the function $u$ associated to $\Omega_{\mathcal C}$ cannot be extended to any neighborhood of them as an $H$-graph, is finite.
Since $\mathcal C$ is finite, $\partial\Omega_{\mathcal
C}\cap\partial B(x_0,R)$ consists of finitely many regular arcs. Their endpoints belong to $A(R)$, but they are finitely many and, by Lemma \[lem1\], it is known that the graph can be extended as an $H$-graph to a neighborhood in ${\mathbb{H}}^2$ of any point in a neighborhood in $\partial\Omega_{\mathcal C}\cap\partial B(x_0,R)$ of any of them. Thus we will not consider such endpoints.
Lemma \[lem1\] also says that the rest of points in $A(R)$ are isolated. On the other hand, it is easy to check that $A(R)$ is closed: We suppose there exists a sequence $\{x_n\}$ in $A(R)$ converging to $x_\infty\not\in A(R)$. Such a point $x_\infty$ must be interior to one of the arcs in $\partial\Omega_{\mathcal
C}\cap\partial B(x_0,R)$ because of the discussion above. Then $u$ admits an extension to a neighborhood of $x_\infty$ in ${\mathbb{H}}^2$. But $x_n$ lies in such a neighborhood for $n$ large enough, a contradiction.
Hence $A(R)$ is closed, consists of isolated points and is contained in the compact set $\partial B(x_0,R)$, so it is finite.
We now have all the ingredients to prove the desired result.
Repeating the argument leading to equation and provided that $R_0<+\infty$ (otherwise we would be done), we can consider the maximal admissible ball $B(x_0,R_0)$. Lemma \[lem2\] guarantees the existence of a finite collection of points in $\partial
B(x_0,R_0)$ such that $B(x_0,R_0)$ cannot be extended in an admissible way to any neighborhood of any of them. Hence, there exists a finite family $\mathcal C_0$ of complete curves with constant geodesic curvature $2H$ or $-2H$, each one tangent to $\partial B(x_0,R_0)$ at one of those points, under the conditions of Lemma \[lem1\]. The family $\mathcal C_0$ is in general position. Then Lemma \[lem3\] says that the curves in $\mathcal
C_0$ are disjoint and that there exists $\delta>0$ such that the domain $\Omega'=\Omega_{\mathcal C_0}\cup(\cup_{\Gamma\in\mathcal
C_0}N_\delta(\Gamma,x_0))$ is admissible.
Moreover, the initial graph can be extended to a neighborhood of any point interior to $\partial\Omega'\cap\partial B(x_0,R_0)$, so we can define the supremum of $R>R_0$ satisfying that $B(x_0,R)\cap(\cap_{\Gamma\in\mathcal C_0} N_\infty(\Gamma,x_0))$ is admissible, called $R_1$. If $R_1<+\infty$, then let us consider the admissible domain $\Omega_1=B(x_0,R_1)\cap(\cap_{\Gamma\in\mathcal
C_0} N_\infty(\Gamma,x_0))$. By definition of $R_1$, there will be points in the interior of ${\partial}\Omega_1\cap{\partial}B(x_0,R_1)$ for which $\Omega_1$ cannot be extended in an admissible way to any neighborhood of any of them. By Lemma \[lem2\], these points are finitely many, and we can apply Lemma \[lem1\] to obtain a new family $\mathcal C_1\supset\mathcal C_0$ in general position for the radius $R_1$. Note that $\mathcal C_1-\mathcal C_0\neq \emptyset$.
This procedure can be iterated to get a strictly increasing sequence (possibly finite) or radii $\{R_n\}$ in such a way that, for any $n$, there exists $\mathcal C_n$, a family of curves in general position for $R_n$, with $\mathcal C_{n-1}\subsetneq\mathcal
C_n$. Besides, the arguments above show that the domain $$\Omega_{\mathcal C_n}=B(x_0,R_n)\cap\left(\bigcap_{\Gamma\in\mathcal
C_n}N_\infty(\Gamma,x_0)\right),$$ is admissible, $\Omega_{\mathcal C_{n-1}}\subset\Omega_{\mathcal
C_n}$ and the associate function $u_n$ extends $u_{n-1}$. Note that there exists $\delta_n>0$ such that $\Omega_{\mathcal C_n}$ can be extended to the admissible domain $\Omega_{\mathcal
C_n}\cup(\cup_{\Gamma\in\mathcal C_n}N_{\delta_n}(\Gamma,x_0))$, by item b) of Lemma \[lem3\].
In this situation, there are two possibilities: Either $R_{n_0}=+\infty$ for some $n_0\geq 0$ (and we would be done since $\Sigma$ would be a complete vertical graph), or the sequence $\{R_n\}$ has infinitely many terms. Suppose we are in the latter case. Then we claim that $\lim\{R_n\}=+\infty$. In order to prove this, we observe that the curves in $\mathcal C_n$ are all disjoint by Lemma \[lem3\]. If $R_\infty=\lim\{R_n\}<+\infty$, we would have an infinite family of disjoint curves (infinite, as each $\mathcal C_n$ strictly contains $\mathcal C_{n-1}$), each one with constant geodesic curvature $2H$ or $-2H$ and intersecting the compact ball $\overline B(x_0,R_\infty)$. But this situation is impossible by condition b) in Definition \[defi:posicion-general\] (it tells us that, when we fix one of such curves, $\Gamma$, the rest of them must lie in one of the two components of ${\mathbb{H}}^2{\smallsetminus}\Gamma$).
Given $n\in{\mathbb{N}}$, the open set $O_n=F_{u_n}(\Omega_{\mathcal
C_n})\subset\Sigma$ satisfies that $\pi(\partial
O_n)\subset\partial B(x_0,R_n)$, since $u_n$ has boundary values $\pm\infty$ on the curves of $\mathcal C_n$. Then we get that the length of any piecewise regular curve $\alpha:[a,b]\to\Sigma$ with $\alpha(a)=p$ and $\alpha(b)\in\partial O_n$ is bigger than $R_n$, as the projected curve $\pi\circ\alpha$ in ${\mathbb{H}}^2$ is shorter than $\alpha$. Thus, the distance in $\Sigma$ from $p$ to $\partial O_n$ is at least $R_n$, so $B_\Sigma(p,R_n)\subset F_u(\Omega_{\mathcal
C_n})$ and we are done since $R_n$ is arbitrarily large.
[1]{}
J. L. Barbosa, M. [do Carmo]{}, and J. Eschenburg. Stability of hypersurfaces with constant mean curvature in [R]{}iemannian manifolds. , [**197**]{}:123–138, 1988.
P. Collin and H. Rosenberg. Construction of harmonic diffeomorphisms and minimal graphs. , [**172**]{}:1879–1906, 2010.
B. Daniel. Isometric immersions into 3-dimensional homogeneous manifolds. , [**82**]{}(1):87–131, 2007.
B. Daniel, L. Hauswirth and P. Mira. Lecture notes on homogeneous $3$-manifolds. Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul, Korea. 4$^\text{th}$ KIAS workshop on Differential Geometry, 2009.
B. Daniel and L. Hauswirth. Half-space theorem, embedded minimal annuli and minimal graphs in the [H]{}eisenberg group. , **98**(2):445–470, 2009.
J. M. Espinar and H. Rosenberg. Complete constant mean curvature surfaces and Bernstein type theorems in $M^2 x R$. , [**82**]{}(3):611–628, 2009.
I. Fernandez and P. Mira. Holomorphic quadratic differentials and the [B]{}erstein problem in [H]{}eisenberg space. , [**361**]{}:5737–5752, 2009.
D. Fischer-[C]{}olbrie. On Complete Minimal Surfaces with Finite [M]{}orse Index in 3-Manifolds. , [**82**]{}:121–132, 1985.
A. Folha and S. Melo. The Dirichlet problem for constant mean curvature graphs in ${\mathbb{H}}^2\times{\mathbb{R}}$ over unbounded domains. , [**251**]{}(1): 37–65, 2011.
L. Hauswirth, H. Rosenberg and J. Spruck, Infinite boundary value problems for constant mean curvature graphs in ${\mathbb{H}}\times{\mathbb{R}}$ and ${\mathbb{S}}\times{\mathbb{R}}$. *Amer. J. Math.*, [**131**]{}:195–226, 2009.
L. Hauswirth, H. Rosenberg and J. Spruck. On complete mean curvature $\frac{1}{2}$ surfaces in ${\mathbb{H}}^2\times{\mathbb{R}}$. , [**16**]{}:989–1005, 2008.
J. M. Manzano. On the classification of Killing submersions and their isometries. Preprint.
J. M. Manzano, J. Pérez and M. M. Rodríguez. Parabolic stable surfaces with constant mean curvature. *Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations*, **42**(1-2):137–152, 2011.
L. Mazet, M. M. Rodríguez and H. Rosenberg. The Dirichlet problem for the minimal surface equation -with possible infinite boundary data- over domains in a Riemannian surface. *Proc. London Math. Soc.*, **102**(3):985–1023 (2011).
W. H. Meeks III and J. Pérez. Constant mean curvature surfaces in metric Lie groups. To appear in *Contemporary Mathematics*.
W. H. Meeks III, J. Pérez and A. Ros. Stable constant mean curvature surfaces. , [**1**]{}:301–380, 2008. International Press, edited by Lizhen Ji, Peter Li, Richard Schoen and Leon Simon. ISBN: 978-1-57146-130-8.
S. Melo. Minimal graphs in PSL$_2({\mathbb{R}})$ over unbounded domains. Preprint.
B. Nelli and H. Rosenberg. Minimal surfaces in ${\mathbb{H}}^2\times{\mathbb{R}}$. *Bull. Braz. Math. Soc.*, **33**(2):263–292 (2002).
B. Nelli and H. Rosenberg. Global properties of constant mean curvature surfaces in ${\mathbb{H}}^2\times{\mathbb{R}}$. *Pacific J. Math.*, **226**(1):137–152 (2006).
C. Peñafiel. Graphs and multi-graphs in homogeneous $3$-manifolds with isometry groups of dimension $4$. *Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.*, **140**(7):2465-2478 (2012).
M. M. Rodríguez. Minimal surfaces with limit ends in ${\mathbb{H}}^2\times{\mathbb{R}}$. To appear in *J. Reine Ang. Math.*.
H. Rosenberg. Constant mean curvature surfaces in homogeneously regular 3-manifolds. *Bull. Austral. Math. Soc.*, **74**:227–238 (2006).
R. Sa Earp. Parabolic and hyperbolic screw motion surfaces in ${\mathbb{H}}^2\times{\mathbb{R}}$. *Bull. Austral. Math. Soc.*, **85**:113–143 (2008).
R. Younes. Minimal surfaces in $\widetilde{\mathrm{PSL}_2}({\mathbb{R}})$. , **54**(2):671–712, 2010.
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
---
abstract: 'We present results from six years of recalibrated and new spectropolarimetric data taken with the University of Wisconsin’s Half-Wave Spectropolarimeter (HPOL) and six years of new data taken with the photoelastic modulating polarimeter (PEMP) at the Flower and Cook Observatory. Combining these data with polarimetric data from the literature allows us to characterize the intrinsic *BVRI* polarized light curves. A repeatable discrepancy of 0.245 days (approximately 6 hours) between the secondary minima in the total light curve and the polarization curve in the *V* band, with similar behavior in the other bands, may represent the first direct evidence for an accretion hot spot on the disk edge.'
author:
- 'Jamie R. Lomax'
- 'Jennifer L. Hoffman'
- 'Nicholas M. Elias II'
- 'Fabienne A. Bastien'
- 'Bruce D. Holenstein'
title: Geometrical Constraints on the Hot Spot in Beta Lyrae
---
INTRODUCTION
============
Beta Lyrae A (also known as HD 174638, HR 7106 and ADS 11745A; hereafter “$\beta$ Lyr") is a bright, well-studied semi-detached eclipsing binary star system. The primary star is a B6-B8 II, giant star (“loser") with a mass of 3 M$_{\sun}$ that is transferring matter to its main-sequence B0.5 V, 12.5 M$_{\sun}$, companion (“gainer") at about $10^{-5}$ M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$ via Roche lobe overflow [@HubenyPlavec; @Harmanec1993]. This process has created a thick accretion disk that obscures the gainer [@Huang; @Wilson; @HubenyPlavec; @Skulskii]. A bipolar flow or jet has also been detected in the system through interferometric and spectropolarimetric methods [@Harmanec1996; @Hoffman1998 hereafter HNF]. The system’s mass ratio, $q$, has been placed between 4.2 and 6 with an inclination angle, *i*, of 85${\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ [@Wilson]. Other studies have suggested $i=83 {\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ with $q=5.6$ and $i=80 {\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ with $q=4.28$ [@HubenyPlavec; @Skulskii]. More recent determinations of the orbital inclination place its value at $i=86 {\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ [@Linnell1998; @Linnell2000]. These large mass ratios are evidence for mass reversal in the system’s history. The disk’s ability to obscure the gainer is due to the nearly edge-on inclination angle of the system.
The system has a well-established orbital period of 12.9 days that increases at a rate of 19 s yr$^{-1}$ [@Harmanec1993]. Recent interferometric observations have produced the first images of the system, which show the loser and the disk as separate objects and confirm the orientation of the system axis, near $254{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$, previously inferred from HNF’s polarimetric analysis [@Harmanec1996; @Zhao; @Schmitt]. Understanding how mass moves between and around the stars and leaves the system is imperative to understanding the evolutionary future of $\beta$ Lyr. However, interferometric techniques have yet to resolve the mass stream or bipolar outflows. We have used spectropolarimetry to study the system and begin to unlock the evolutionary clues contained within the circumstellar material.
Light scattering from electrons in the highly ionized circumstellar material in $\beta$ Lyr produces a variable phase-dependent polarization. Since electron scattering preserves information about the orientation of the scattering region, analyzing polarimetric behavior as a function of wavelength allows us to determine from where in the system different spectral features have arisen. In this way, spectropolarimetric observations of $\beta$ Lyr can be used to infer the geometrical properties of the scattering material in the system.
Optical polarimetry was used to study $\beta$ Lyr as early as 1934, but it was not known until 1963 that the system exhibited variable polarization [@Ohman; @Shakhovskoi]. Appenzeller and Hiltner (1967; hereafter AH) were the first to publish interstellar polarization (ISP) corrected broadband *UBV* polarization curves of $\beta$ Lyr. More recently, HNF published ISP-corrected polarized light curves in the *V* band and H$\alpha$ and $\lambda 5876$ emission lines using a subset of the data we present here. HNF used the position angles of the polarized UV continuum and the hydrogen Balmer emission lines to confirm that a bipolar outflow exists in the $\beta$ Lyr system after their discovery by Harmanec et al. (1996). HNF also interpreted the average position angle of the visible polarized light ($164{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$) to be the physical axis of the binary system, an interpretation which was borne out by the interferometric images presented by Zhao et al (2008) and Schmitt et al. (2009).
In this paper we present new *BVRI* and $\lambda$5876 polarization curves and polarized light curves of $\beta$ Lyr. The details of our spectropolarimetric observations and our interstellar polarization corrections are in Section 2. Section 3 presents and displays our observational results. We analyze our findings in Section 4 and summarize conclusions in Section 5.
OBSERVATIONS
============
This study compiles data from three distinct data sets. The first consists of 69 optical spectropolarimetric observations of $\beta$ Lyr taken over 6 years with the University of Wisconsin’s Half-Wave Spectropolarimeter (HPOL) at the 0.9 m telescope at Pine Bluff Observatory (PBO); the second data set comprises 6 years of broadband optical polarimetric data obtained at the Flower and Cook Observatory; and the third is 3 years of archived broadband optical polarimetric data from AH taken with the 24 inch rotatable telescope at the Yerkes Observatory. To calculate the phase for each observation, we used the ephemeris $$T_{\mathrm{pri}}=\mathrm{HJD}\: 2,408,247.966 + 12.91378E + 3.87196 \times 10^{-6}E^{2}$$ where *E* is the total number of orbits since the primary eclipse that occurred at HJD 2,408,247.966 [@Harmanec1993]. This is the same ephemeris used by HNF; it does not significantly differ from the more recent ephemeris presented by Ak et al. (2007).
HPOL Data Set
-------------
The first 14 HPOL observations, obtained between 1992 September and 1994 November, used a dual Reticon array detector with a wavelength range of 3200-7600 Å and a resolution of 15 Å (see Wolff, Nordsieck, & Nook 1996 for further instrument information). The remaining 55 observations, taken between 1995 March and 1998 September, used a CCD-based system. This extended the wavelength range, 3200-10500 Å, and increased the resolution to 7.5 Å below 6000 Å and 10 Å above [@NordsieckHarris]. The first 29 observations were previously published in HNF; they have undergone recalibration for use in this study.
Table \[betLyrObs\] lists the orbital phases along with civil and heliocentric Julian dates for the midpoint of each HPOL observation. Each $\beta$ Lyr observation covers the full spectral range, with the exception of the four nights indicated in Table \[betLyrObs\]. Two observations, 1995 May 27 and 1995 August 14, used only the red grating (6,000-10500 Å) of the CCD system while the other two, 1997 May 17 and 1997 May 26, used only the blue grating (3200-6000 Å). Each individual observation typically lasted between 45 minutes and an hour (approximately 0.03 to 0.04 days) when both gratings were used.
We used 11 HPOL observations of $\beta$ Lyr B taken between 1995 May and 1999 November to obtain an ISP estimate. Beta Lyr B is a member of the same association as $\beta$ Lyr A and is located 45" away [@Abt]. All of these observations were made using HPOL’s CCD-based system. Table \[betLyrObs\] also lists the civil and heliocentric Julian dates that correspond to the midpoints of each observation of $\beta$ Lyr B and indicates which grating(s) were used during the observations. The first two observations, 1995 May 21 and 1996 July 3, were previously published in HNF and have undergone recalibration for this study. We reduced all of the HPOL observations using the REDUCE software package (described by Wolff et al. 1996).
We estimated the ISP by fitting a modified Serkowski law curve to the error-weighted mean of the 11 observations of $\beta$ Lyr B [@Serkowski; @Wilking]. The parameters for our ISP estimate are $P_{\mathrm{max}}=0.422\% $ $\pm$ $0.005\%$, $\lambda_{\mathrm{max}}=4149$ Å$\pm$ $80$ Å, $K=0.699$ and $\mathrm{PA}=151.16{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ $\pm$ $0.36{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$. We subtracted this ISP estimate from the HPOL $\beta$ Lyr data. This new ISP correction has significantly improved uncertainties over previous estimates; it is consistent with the HNF estimate ($P_{\mathrm{max}}=0.419\% \pm 0.013\%$, $\lambda_{\mathrm{max}}=4605$ Å$\pm$ $260$ Å, and $\mathrm{P.A.}=151.0{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ $\pm$ $0.9{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$), which was determined using only the 1995 May 21 HPOL observation. AH found a similar estimate, $P_{max}=0.42\%$ $\pm$ $0.04\%$ and $PA=153.2{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ $\pm$ $3{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ by taking the weighted mean of the observed polarization of the associated stars $\beta$ Lyr B, E, and F.
FCO Data Set
------------
Our second data set is made up of 19 *B* band, 88 *V* band and 17 *R* band observations obtained at the Flower and Cook Observatory between 1987 and 1992 with the PEMP instrument [@Bruce; @Elias]. The length of each observation was between 20 and 25 minutes (approximately 0.01 days). The phases along with the civil and heliocentric Julian dates for each observation are listed in Table \[betLyrObsFCO\]. We have no observations of $\beta$ Lyr B taken with the same instrument as this data set. Therefore, we used the Serkowski fit to the HPOL $\beta$ Lyr B observations (see Section 2.1) to calculate the ISP contributions at the central wavelengths of the *BVR* bands and subtracted these estimated values from the observations in this data set. We list these data and ISP subtracted data in Tables \[BFCOData\] through \[RFCOData\].
AH Data Set
-----------
We also used archival *BV* polarization data taken between 1964 and 1966, originally published in AH. This data set consists of 37 *B* band and 127 *V* band observations, the details of which can be found in AH (and references therein). The DC two-channel polarimeter was rotated $30{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ between 12 separate 20 second exposures of $\beta$ Lyr and the sky [@Appenzeller]. Therefore, the total integration time for both $\beta$ Lyr and the sky was 4 minutes (approximately 0.003 days). We converted these data from polarization magnitudes to percent polarization and converted their Julian dates to heliocentric Julian dates for use in this study. For consistency between the HPOL and AH data sets, we did not use AH’s published ISP corrected data because it included two stars ($\beta$ Lyr E and F) that are not included in the HPOL ISP estimate. Instead, we subtracted only the AH *BV* $\beta$ Lyr B observations from their non-ISP corrected $\beta$ Lyr data in each respective band.
RESULTS
=======
Broadband Polarimetry
---------------------
To examine the behavior of the continuum polarization with orbital phase, we applied synthetic *BVRI* Johnson-Cousins band filters (described by Bessell 1990) to the ISP-corrected HPOL data. The filter routine produces broadband values and associated internal errors for each observation; however, we must still take into account systematic variations in the instrumental polarization between nights. Systematic errors for HPOL at PBO were evaluated by periodically analyzing observations of unpolarized standard stars. Tables \[BHPOLData\] through \[IHPOLData\] list broadband polarization values and internal errors determined by the filter routine along with the systematic errors. In the case of the Reticon data, the systematic errors are less well determined; based on our previous experience with these data, we have estimated the uncertainties in the Stokes parameters for the Reticon data to be $0.02\%$ in all bands. Figures \[Bband\] through \[Iband\] display these data graphically, using the larger of the internal and systematic errors for each observation, along with the FCO and AH data.
The position angles for the *BVRI* bands remain relatively constant with orbital phase except near secondary eclipse, where the position angle values appear to rotate away from the mean value. The bottom panels in Figures \[Bband\] through \[Iband\] show this behavior in each band. In the standard picture of the system, the polarization is produced by scattering from the accretion disk edge; the average position angle at these wavelengths should therefore provide us with an estimate of the orientation of the axis of the disk and thus of the system as a whole. To calculate the average position angle in each band, we excluded the secondary eclipse points (between phases 0.425 and 0.575) because they do not follow the near-constant trend displayed at other phases and performed a linear, error-weighted, least-squares fit to the remaining data in *Q-U* space. We then used the slopes of the fitted lines to determine the position angles listed in Table \[betLyrPA\]. We also calculated a position angle for Balmer jump index (the vector difference between the polarization above and below the Balmer jump). As discussed in HNF, the broadband polarization in $\beta$ Lyr undergoes a $90{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ position angle rotation across the Balmer Jump. Thus, this vector difference defines the system axis in *Q-U* space. Because the Balmer jump index is independent of the ISP, it provides us with an independent estimate of the orientation of the system axis.
We find the weighted mean position angle of the HPOL Reticon and CCD bands and the Balmer jump index to be $ 164.6{\ensuremath{^\circ}}\pm 0.22{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$. For each band, the CCD and Reticon position angles do not agree within uncertainties, with the Reticon data yielding larger position angles in all bands. This result is due to poor sampling in *Q-U* space; the Reticon data only consist of 14 data points in each band while there are 55 observations in the CCD *V* and *R* bands and 53 observations in the CCD *B* and *I* bands. This skews the linear fit since the full range of possible observable *Q-U* values is not well covered by the Reticon data. However, the larger systematic uncertainties we adopt for the Reticon data result in these points carrying a lower weight in the fit; thus, we are confident that our weighted mean is a fair representation of the true system axis. HNF found the mean *V* band position angle to be $163.8{\ensuremath{^\circ}}\pm 0.15{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$; while our estimate is not formally consistent with HNF’s, it shows the broad band polarization behavior of the system is the same in all optical bands. Our polarization position angle implies a system position angle, defined by the position angle of the disk axis, of $253.8{\ensuremath{^\circ}}\pm 0.15{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ on the sky. As expected for polarization by electron scattering, the position angle of the polarized light is perpendicular to the position angles describing the system orientation given by Zhao et al. (2008) and Schmitt et al. (2009). Zhao et al. (2008) estimated the position angle of the system’s ascending node as $253.22{\ensuremath{^\circ}}\pm 1.97{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ and $251.87{\ensuremath{^\circ}}\pm 1.83{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ using two different image reconstruction techniques on their interferometric data and $254.39{\ensuremath{^\circ}}\pm 0.83{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ using a model of the system, while Schmitt et al. (2009) estimate $249.0{\ensuremath{^\circ}}\pm 4.0{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$.
We rotated all of the HPOL, AH and FCO data to the average position angle of $164{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$. This orients our data with respect to the intrinsic polarization axis of the system. After this rotation, $\%\textit{U}$ averages to zero in each band and the polarization varies significantly only in the $\%\textit{Q}$ direction. In the rest of this paper we present the projected Stokes parameter $\% \textit{Q}_p$ resulting from this rotation. The use of this quantity is beneficial because it can be positive or negative, whereas %*P* is always positive. Data points that have a position angle near $164{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ will have a positive $\% \textit{Q}_p$ value while points with a position angle perpendicular to this (near $74{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$) will have a negative $\% \textit{Q}_p$. Hereafter we display only $\% \textit{Q}_p$ because $\% \textit{U}_p$ values scatter around zero. Because the rotation is a simple trigonometric calculation, we present in Tables \[BFCOData\] through \[IHPOLData\] the unrotated $\% \textit{Q}$ and ISP subtracted FCO and HPOL data only.
The middle panels in Figures \[Bband\] through \[Iband\] show the $\% \textit{Q}_p$ curves for the *BVRI* bands after rotation. We used the program PERIOD04 to perform a Fourier fit to the data for each band [@Period04]. The PERIOD04 fitting formula is $y= Z + \sum_{i=1}^n A_i \sin(2\pi (\Omega_i t + \phi_i))$ where *n* is the number of sine terms in the fit, *Z* is the zero point, *A* is the amplitude, $\Omega$ is the frequency, and $\phi$ is the phase. The results of the fits are displayed as solid curves in each figure and their parameters are given in Table \[FitParam\]. The *V* band, and to a lesser extent the *B* band, Fourier fits deviate from the data at phase 0.9 (see Figure \[Vband\]). This discrepancy disappears in the *V* band if we include three frequency terms in the Fourier fit. However, we are not as confident in the third frequency as we are in the first two because the PERIOD04 fitting program produces a reasonable third term for the *V* band only. Therefore, in Table \[FitParam\] we report parameters for only the first two terms, but we display both the two-term and three-term fits in Figure \[Vband\]. These fits provide the first quantitative representations of the polarization variations in the $\beta$ Lyr system.
The data in the *BVRI* bands are almost always positive, indicating their position angles stay near $164{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ throughout the orbital period. Each of the bands displays an increase in $\% \textit{Q}_p$ at primary eclipse and two other increases near the quadrature phases (0.25 and 0.75). The height difference between the polarization bumps at the quadrature phases noted by HNF disappears now that more data are added, but we note that the *B* and *V* phase 0.25 bump have a higher dispersion around the average $\% \textit{Q}_p$ value than does the 0.75 phase bump. The *R* and *I* band show the opposite behavior; future observations will be able to tell us whether this is due to their poor phase coverage or whether it indicates that the *R* and *I* bands are probing a different region of the disk than the *B* and *V* bands. We calculated the variance of the two quadrature bumps between phases 0.25 and 0.35, and 0.65 and 0.75 to formally show this. The first quadrature bump has *BVRI* variances of 0.081 $\pm$ 0.006, 0.110 $\pm$ 0.005, 0.040 $\pm$ 0.002, and 0.016 $\pm$ 0.002 respectively, while the second quadrature bump has variances of 0.048 $\pm$ 0.005, 0.027 $\pm$ 0.002, 0.281 $\pm$ 0.005, and 0.069 $\pm$ 0.004.
The *R* and *I* bands also produce a lower polarization signal than the *B* and *V* bands. This change in polarization behavior with wavelength could indicate that scattering mechanisms other than electron scattering are present in the system. However, more observations in the *R* and *I* bands are needed to rule out the possibility that the low signal is due to a lack of phase coverage in these bands.
Figures \[Bband\] through \[Iband\] also show that in each band, the polarization curve has a fitted minimum in polarization that occurs just prior to the secondary eclipse in total light. This minimum is accompanied by a rotation in the position angle of the polarized light away from its average value. Table \[HSSize\] gives the phases of the $\%\textit{Q}_P$ Fourier fit minimum in all bands. The offset between secondary eclipse in polarized light and total light is a new result, seen here for the first time due to the improved phase coverage in these data. We discuss the implications of this phenomenon in Section 4.
At primary eclipse, there are hints of similar behavior: the polarization maxima in the *B* and *V* bands occur slightly before phase 0.0, and all bands show a deviation from the mean position angle at and just after phase 0.0. However, we consider the primary eclipse features to be less significant than the ones at secondary eclipse for the following reasons. The three data points showing noticeable deviations from the mean position angle all occurred on the same night, 1997 August 25, which suggests that this effect may be due to a non-periodic process intrinsic to the $\beta$ Lyr system, or to a change in observing conditions that affected that night’s data. If the same structure is responsible for the phenomena at both eclipses, we expect that a similar position angle scatter should exist in observations from the same orbit of the system whose phases are between primary and secondary eclipse, when such a structure should be most visible to the observer. However, neither the data from 1997 August 26, nor 1997 August 30 show such behavior. Additionally, the polarization maximum in the *R* band occurs at phase 0.0 within the uncertainties, and in the *I* band the maximum occurs just after phase 0.0. If we include the third term in the *V* band Fourier fit, the primary polarization maximum occurs at phase 0.0 within uncertainties. Because the eclipse behavior is not consistent between bands and the associated position angle scatter appears to have occurred during only one orbit of the system, we consider it unlikely that these are due to a stable physical structure within the system (see Section 4 for further discussion of the effects seen at primary eclipse).
Figure \[allbands\] displays the projected polarized *BVRI* flux light curves for the $\beta$ Lyr system. To create these polarized light curves, we multiplied the fitted polarization curves shown in Figures \[Bband\] through \[Iband\] by their respective Fourier fit light curves [@Harmanec1996] normalized to maximum light. In all bands, the polarized flux remains nearly constant across primary eclipse due to a decrease in total light and an increase in $\%\textit{Q}_P$. The secondary eclipse offset seen in Figures \[Bband\] through \[Iband\] persists in Figure \[allbands\], while quadrature phases display local maxima. The *B* and *V* band appear to be the most similar; they overlap for most phases, while outside of secondary eclipse and the first quadrature phase the *R* and *I* bands produce the lowest net projected polarized flux. We do not consider the apparent height differences between bands at the quadrature phases to be significant due to the scatter in the observational points and the lack of coverage in the *R* and *I* bands.
Line Polarimetry
----------------
We also took advantage of the spectropolarimetric nature of the data by studying the polarization behavior of the strongest optical emission lines in $\beta$ Lyr’s spectrum: H$\alpha$, H$\beta$, $\lambda$5876, $\lambda$6678, and $\lambda$7065. HNF hypothesized that the H$\alpha$, H$\beta$, $\lambda$5876 and $\lambda$7065 lines, which show a negative projected polarization, scatter in the bipolar outflow, while the $\lambda$6678 scatters on the edge of the disk. However, HNF did not have enough data to construct a full polarization phase curve for the lines. Our expanded data set allows us to do this. However, we present only our $\lambda$5876 results in graphical form because our uncertainties are relatively large due to signal-to-noise limitations. Rather than present the H$\alpha$, H$\beta$, $\lambda$6678, and $\lambda$7065 data, we describe their general behavior below. Future observations will allow us to use these data to draw quantitative conclusions about the scattering regions that give rise to the polarization in these lines.
In order to calculate the polarization for each emission line, we used the flux equivalent width method described by HNF, using the same line and continuum regions as far as possible. We corrected the H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$ lines for underlying unpolarized absorption components (arising from the loser) in the same manner as HNF, using their preferred absorption equivalent widths of $8\pm 2$ Åfor H$\alpha$ and $6\pm 1$ Åfor H$\beta$. This has the following effect on the data. The continuum is positively polarized while the lines are negatively polarized. If we do not correct for unpolarized absorption, we remove too much continuum, and thus our resulting line polarization is too negative. With the absorption correction, the continuum contribution is smaller and the magnitude of the polarization is also smaller, resulting in a less negative $\%\textit{Q}_p$.
We do not present the HPOL Reticon line polarization values due to their large uncertainties. Figure \[HeI5876\] shows $\%\textit{Q}_p$ and position angle curves for the $\lambda$5876 line. It has a negative $\%\textit{Q}_p$; thus its position angle is perpendicular to the intrinsic axis of the system. In addition, the polarization for the line approaches zero at both primary and secondary eclipses. For this to happen, the scattering region for this line must lie near enough to the orbital plane of the system to be occulted both by the loser and by the disk. HNF previously suggested that this line scatters in the bipolar outflows because its average position angles lie near $74{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$, corresponding to negative values of $\%\textit{Q}_P$. The results from our extended data set support this interpretation and further suggest that the $\lambda$5876 scattering region within the outflows must lie between the loser and the disk and have a vertical extent comparable to the height of the disk.
The H$\alpha$, H$\beta$, and $\lambda$7065 lines also all display a negative $\%\textit{Q}_p$ and are likely scattered in the same region as the $\lambda$5876 line. Their average position angles are listed in Table \[betLyrPA\].
The $\lambda$6678 data show a polarization behavior different from that of the other lines. The data are generally positively polarized and their average position angle, $138.2{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$, agrees more closely with the intrinsic axis of the system than do those of the other emission lines (see Table \[betLyrPA\]).
Period Analysis
---------------
Besides the primary orbital period of $\beta$ Lyr (12.9 days), analysis of light curves has revealed several longer periodicities. A 340-day period was detected by Peel (1997), while both Van Hamme et al. (1995) and Harmanec et al (1996) detected a 282-day period. Wilson and Van Hamme (1999) searched polarimetry from AH, HNF, [@Serkowski], and [@Shulov] for periodicities but did not detect anything significant.
We performed a Lomb-Scargle power spectrum analysis to search for any periodic behavior in our polarimetric broadband (HPOL, AH, and FCO) and line data (H$\alpha$ and $\lambda$ 5876) not associated with the 12.9 day orbital period of the system. While none of the previously detected longer periods were found, our analysis indicates the presence of periods of approximately 4.3 days in both the *V* and *B* bands with a False Alarm Probability (FAP; Horne & Baliunas 1986) of $10^{-6}$ when using all three data sets. None of the other bands or the line polarization data appear to contain periods other than the orbital period. We also searched for periods within the HPOL, AH and FCO data sets individually to look for any transient periodic variations. We find that the 4.3 day period also appears in the *V* and *B* AH data set with a FAP of $10^{-6}$, but it does not appear in the other two data sets. This period is exactly one third of the 12.9-day orbital period of the $\beta$ Lyr system and results from the combination of two separate effects: the increase in polarization at the quadrature phases due to light scattering off the disk edge and the increase in polarization at primary eclipse due to the occultation of unpolarized light by the loser [@Hoffman2003 hereafter HWN]. These two effects cause the $\%\textit{Q}_p$ curves to form a complete cosine curve between phases 0.0 and 0.3, a second cosine curve between phases 0.3 and 0.6 and a third cosine between 0.6 and 1.0 (see Figures 1 through 4). Therefore, this period does not provide new information about the $\beta$ Lyr system.
We also performed a much simpler analysis to search for signatures of the 282-day period, which has been ascribed to variability of the conditions of the circumstellar and circumbinary gas [@Wilson; @Ak]. Time plots of $\%\textit{Q}_p$, $\%\textit{U}_p$, position angle, and percent polarization for each of the *BVRI* bands and the $\lambda$5876 line did not reveal the 282-day period and are therefore not shown. However, the time coverage of our observations is very uneven and could have prevented us from detecting variations on this time scale. The observations in our data set were taken between 1964 and 1998, but we have no polarimetric observations taken during 1990, 1991, or between 1966 and 1987. The number of observations performed per year only adds further complications; several years have very few observations. We also note that the only the HPOL data set has observations of every band and the $\lambda$5876 line. For these reasons, we also performed an analysis similar to Harmanec et al. (1996) on the $\%\textit{Q}_p$ data for each band and the $\lambda$5876 line. Plotting the data on the 282.37 day period mitigates the lack of time coverage by “folding" observations onto one cycle.
We plotted the data from selected orbital period phase bins versus their phase on the 282.37 day period (see Harmanec et al. 1996 for a similar analysis of a large amount of *V* band total-light photometry). We chose the following five orbital phase bins for several reasons: the 0.0-1.0 bin allows us to use all of the data, the 0.6-0.15 bin is where Harmanec et al. (1996) detected the 282.37 day period the most strongly, the 0.25-0.35 and 0.65-0.75 bins allow us to determine whether the polarization of the quadrature phases changes on a 282.37 day time scale, and the 0.425-0.575 bin allows us to determine whether the secondary eclipse has a 282.37 day periodic behavior. The 0.25-0.35, 0.425-0.575, and 0.65-0.75 orbital period bins are too tight to leave a useful number of observations in the *R* and *I* bands and the $\lambda$5876 line. While the *B* and *V* bands are slightly less affected by the size of the 0.25-0.35, 0.425-0.575, and 0.65-0.75 orbital phase bins, their behavior does not indicate, by eye or by using PERIOD04, the presence of a variation on a 282.37 day period. The size of the 0.6-0.15 and 0.0-1.0 bins present the best chance of detecting this period because the amount of data is not severely reduced. However, neither bin reveals the presence of the 282.37 day period. We also subtracted the Fourier fits from the data in the *BVRI* bands (see Section 3.1) and searched the residuals for the 282.37 day period with the same bins used for the original $\%\textit{Q}_p$ data. The analysis on the residuals produced similar results; we do not find evidence of a 282.37 day period in either the $\%\textit{Q}_p$ data or the Fourier fit subtracted residuals. However, we note that the Fourier fits deviate from the data at some phases (see Section 3.1). Plots from this analysis resemble scatter plots and are therefore not shown.
DISCUSSION
==========
In interpreting their polarized flux curves, HNF proposed two different possibilities for the origin and scattering location of the visible light. In their “disk-disk" case, this light arises from within the disk and scatters from the disk edge; in the “loser-lobe" case, the *V*-band continuum light arises from the loser and scatters from material between the loser and the disk. In this analysis, HNF implicitly assumed that all features of the visible polarized flux curve are due to the same origin and scatterer. However, modeling work by HWN and subsequent modeling results (Hoffman et al., in prep.) have shown that the scattered light can originate both from the loser and from the disk in differing proportions over the binary cycle. These newer results suggest the following interpretations of our *BVRI* polarization curves. The net increase in $\% \textit{Q}_p$ at primary eclipse (Figures \[Bband\]-\[Iband\]) is the result of the unpolarized light from the primary star being blocked by the disk material at phase 0.0. HNF interpreted the increase in $\% \textit{Q}_p$ at the quadrature phases as arising in one of two ways: light originating from within the disk and scattering from the disk edge, or light originating from the loser and scattering from material between the stars. We propose, based on recent modeling work by Hoffman, that these “quadrature bumps" form simply by loser light scattering from the disk edge. The minimum at secondary eclipse occurs because the unpolarized primary star blocks light scattered in the secondary component.
Near secondary eclipse in all four broadband $\% \textit{Q}_p$ curves, the minimum in polarization precedes the minimum in total light; the phases for the polarization minimum in the *BVRI* bands are listed in Table \[HSSize\]. In each band, this minimum corresponds to a rotation in position angle away from the average value; the phase ranges for this rotation are also listed in Table \[HSSize\]. In the basic star-star-disk model for the system, there is no mechanism to produce this disparity. If the loser is an unpolarized source, as indicated by the absence of a primary eclipse in the polarized flux curves (Figure 5; HNF), then the polarization minimum produced by its transit across the disk should be centered at flux minimum (phase 0.5; HWN). Thus, to explain this offset, we need to invoke another system component. Since $\beta$ Lyr is a mass transfer system, it most likely contains a mass stream connecting the loser and the disk as well as a ‘hot spot’ where the mass stream from the loser interacts with the disk edge [@Lubow see also the geometries proposed by HNF]. Some studies (for example, Bisikalo et al. 2000 and references therein) suggest that the manner in which the mass stream approaches the disk prevents a hot spot from forming. Instead, a portion of the stream makes a full revolution around the disk and then interacts with the original stream. The process of this interaction allows the material that has made a full revolution around the secondary star to become part of mass stream again; Bisikalo et al. (2000) do not consider it to be part of the disk. Since this material’s position angle is the same as the disk in the system, polarimetry cannot distinguish between the two possibilities. Therefore, we use the term ‘hot spot’ to refer to the region where the mass stream interacts with material already encircling the secondary star and assume that any material which has completed a revolution around the secondary star is part of the disk.
Even if a true “hot spot" is not created by the mass stream-disk interaction, the region where the stream and disk meet could potentially decrease observed polarization from the disk edge by disrupting the otherwise smooth structure of the disk edge and adding unpolarized light at phases when it is visible. On the other hand, the mass stream, which is elongated in the same direction as the disk, should produce a polarization position angle very similar to that of the disk. Therefore, the presence of the mass stream should not lead to a decrease in the observed polarization. The effects of a hot spot would be detectable in the polarization light curves in the *BVRI* bands because the disk is the primary scattering region for visible light in the $\beta$ Lyr system. But, if it is not significantly brighter than the surrounding disk, the hot spot would not be visible in the total light curves. Therefore, we interpret the $\%\textit{Q}_p$ minimum associated with the randomization of the polarized position angle prior to secondary eclipse as the first direct evidence for the proposed hot spot on the $\beta$ Lyr disk edge [@Lubow; @Harmanec2002].
We expect the hot spot to create an unstructured region on the disk edge where the polarization vectors of the scattered light are randomized in position angle. When this part of the disk is visible, the hot spot should cause a decreased polarization signal and a rotation in position angle, both of which occur in our polarization curves (Figures \[Bband\]-\[Iband\]). As long as the hot spot does not lie on the line connecting the centers of mass of the two stars, and its brightness in the visible continuum is similar to that of the undisturbed disk, its effect should result in a minimum in polarization that does not correspond to a minimum in flux. Hydrodynamical modeling of the $\beta$ Lyr system indicates that the mass stream, and therefore its associated hot spot, should lead the loser in the sense of rotation of the system [@Lubow; @model]. In the $\beta$ Lyr polarization curves, the polarization minimum and concurrent position angle variation occur just before secondary eclipse, suggesting that the hot spot begins its transit of the disk before the loser does. In fact, the larger dispersion of points in the *B* and *V* bands at the first quadrature phase when compared to the second quadrature phase suggests that the hot spot is already in view by phase 0.25. In this picture, the minimum polarization occurs at the phases where the disk area disrupted by the hot spot and eclipsed by the loser is maximized. We sketch this proposed interpretation in Figure \[HotSpotEffect\].
We note that in all bands, there are fewer data points after secondary eclipse than before, which may skew the $\% \textit{Q}_P$ Fourier fit near secondary minimum. However, we have several reasons to believe the eclipse offset is not an artifact of the fit. The effect is apparent in all filters, some of which have a much lower point density in phase then the *V* band. (However, the *V* band displays the smallest difference between the $\% \textit{Q}_P$ near secondary minimum and phase 0.5.) The position angle rotation does not heavily depend on the number of points, is apparent in all bands, and has a larger effect at pre-secondary eclipse phases than post-secondary eclipse phases. Finally, the uncertainties on the phases at which the minima occur are small (see Table \[HSSize\]) compared to the difference between phase 0.5 and the polarization secondary minimum. Future work will include filling in the post-secondary data gap with new HPOL observations to improve the Fourier fits and quantify the $\% \textit{Q}_P$ near secondary minimum offsets more reliably.
In the subsections below, we outline three different estimates of the size of the hot spot, assuming it has the same height as the edge of the disk. We use the following values for system parameters: a loser radius of $R_L=15R_\sun$, a disk diameter of $D_D=60R_\sun$, a binary separation of $R_S=58R_\sun$, and a disk height of $H_D=16R_\sun$ [@Linnell2000; @Harmanec2002].
Hot Spot Size Estimate: $\% \textit{Q}_P$ Method
------------------------------------------------
We can use the offset in secondary eclipse to estimate a maximum size for the hot spot. Assuming circular orbits, we have the scenario depicted in Figure \[HotSpotSize\]. Knowing that phase 0.5 occurs at an angle of 180${\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ on the circle depicting the loser’s orbit, we can use a simple ratio to find the angle $\theta$, $$\frac{0.5}{180{\ensuremath{^\circ}}}=\frac{P}{180{\ensuremath{^\circ}}-\theta}$$ where $P$ is the phase for which secondary eclipse occurs in polarized light (Table \[HSSize\]) and $180{\ensuremath{^\circ}}-\theta$ is the angle from zero at which phase $P$ occurs. If we know $\theta$, we can also find the length of line $x$, $$x=R_S \sin(\theta)$$ where $R_S$ is the radius between the center of the disk and the center of the loser. With the length of line $x$ we can estimate the projected size of the hot spot, $HS_{Q}$ (hatched region in the Observer’s View in Figure \[HotSpotSize\]), with the following equation, $$HS_{\textit{Q}} = \left\{ \begin{array}{l l}
60 R_\sun & \mbox{for $x \ge \frac{1}{2}D_D$},\\
(x-R_L) + \frac{1}{2}D_D & \mbox{for $\frac{1}{2}D_D > x > R_L$}, \\
\frac{1}{2} D_D - (R_L-x) & \mbox{for $R_L > x > 0$}
\end{array} \right.$$ where $D_D$ is the diameter of the accretion disk and $R_L$ is the radius of the loser.
Using the above formulae we can calculate the maximum projected hot spot size for the *BVRI* bands. Table \[HSSize\] lists the results. The maximum hot spot size ranges from 22 $R_\sun$ to 33 $R_\sun$. Since we assume the hot spot has the same height as the disk, these values represent ‘widths’ along the projected face of the disk. We do not calculate formal error bars on these estimates because the estimates vary so widely.
Hot Spot Size Estimate: Position Angle Method
---------------------------------------------
We also used the variations in position angle to estimate a maximum size for the hot spot. First, we calculated the size of the disk in phase. To do this we solved Equation 2 for $\theta$ when $x= \frac{1}{2}D_D$. The phase for the left side of the disk as depicted in Figure \[HotSpotSize\] is then given by Equation 1. We calculate this phase to be 0.413. Similarly for the right side of the disk we calculate a phase of 0.587. The resulting size of the disk in phase is the difference of these phases, or 0.174.
We then estimated the size of the hot spot in phase by finding how long the randomization of position angle lasts. We assumed any points near secondary eclipse that deviated significantly from the average position angle were due to the hot spot. We did not use a formal calculation to find these points; we chose the smallest and largest phases for the randomized position angles by eye. We then took the difference in phase between the deviant observations with the smallest and largest phases to calculate the size of the hot spot in phase, $\theta_{HS}$ (Table \[HSSize\]). In this case the maximum hot spot size, $HS_{PA}$, is given by the ratio $$\frac{60R_\sun}{0.174}=\frac{HS_{PA}}{\theta_{HS}}.$$ Table \[HSSize\] lists the maximum projected size of the hot spot across the edge of the disk for each band. Our hot spot size estimates found with this method range from 26 $R_\sun$ to 58 $R_\sun$.
Hot Spot Size Estimate: Simple Model
------------------------------------
We used a simple model for a third estimate of the size of the hot spot. For this model we assume the polarization of the disk is uniform across the disk edge. We first calculated a baseline $qf_{DC}$, the polarized flux due to the disk’s self-illumination, by taking the error-weighted mean $\%\textit{Q}_P$ multiplied by the normalized Fourier fit flux of the observations between phases 0.7 and 1.2 for each band (HWN). This assumes all the polarized flux at these phases is due to light originating within the disk rather than from the loser, a reasonable assumption given the results of HWN. We also define $qf_{min}$, the minimum polarized flux near secondary eclipse due to the primary star’s eclipse and hot spot’s transit of the disk, to be the error-weighted mean $\%\textit{Q}_P$ multiplied by the normalized Fourier fit flux for observations between phases 0.4 and 0.55. If we subtract from $qf_{DC}$ the amount of polarized flux blocked by the primary star and disrupted by the transit of the hot spot, the result should be $qf_{min}$, the polarized flux observed at secondary eclipse.
The amount of polarized flux lost due to the primary eclipsing the disk and the hot spot transiting the disk is given by $$qf_{DC}-\frac{qf_{DC}}{A_D}A_{ecl}-\frac{qf_{DC}}{A_D}A_{HS}=qf_{min}$$ where $A_{ecl}$ is the area of the disk eclipsed by the primary star (shaded region in Figure \[HotSpotSize\]), $A_D$ is the observed area of the edge of the disk, and $A_{HS}=H_DHS_{SM}$ is the area of the disk edge disrupted by the hot spot. The fraction $qf_{DC}/A_D=qf_{DC}/D_DH_D$ gives the polarized flux per unit area from the disk. The second term is the polarized flux eclipsed by the primary star and the third term is the polarized flux subtracted by the hot spot. We note that Equation 5 assumes an inclination angle of $i=90{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ and that each unit area of the disk contributes to the polarized flux equally. In reality, the relative contributions of each portion of a disk with an inclination angle of $i=90{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ are not equal due to limb darkening. Taking limb darkening into account would complicate our estimates; a hot spot near a limb darkened edge of the disk would need to be larger to account for the same amount polarized flux loss that would be lost by a hot spot closer to the center of the disk. Table \[HSSize\] gives $qf_{DC}$, $qf_{min}$, and the resulting hot spot size estimate for the *BVRI* bands using Equation 5.
Assuming an inclination angle of $i=86{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ [@Linnell1998; @Linnell2000] instead of $90{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ changes the equation we use to calculate $HS_{SM}$. In this case, the area of the disk that we see is larger than in the edge-on case; projection effects allow us to see a small portion of the back side of the disk. The visible portion of the interior of the disk is polarized differently than the disk edge; the polarized flux from the interior should cancel with some of the polarized flux from the disk edge. Also, the area eclipsed by the primary star is larger and the center of the star is no longer aligned with the plane that cuts the disk into equal bottom and top halves.
In order to calculate an estimate for $i=86{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$, we make the assumption that the area of the disk we see is rectangular. This makes our calculations easier since the projected height of the disk does not change across the disk edge, but has the effect of making our estimate smaller; if the edges of the projected disk have a height of $H_D$ and the center of the projected disk has a larger height due to the projection, the total area of the disk is smaller than a rectangle whose height is the projected height (see Figure \[ieffects\]). This assumption allows us to use Equation 5 with a slight adjustment: $$qf_{DC}-\frac{qf_{DC}}{D_DH_{PD}}A_{ecl}-\frac{qf_{DC}}{D_DH_{PD}}A_{HS}=qf_{min}$$ where $H_{PD}$ is the projected disk height. A simple calculation reveals that $H_{PD}=20R_\sun$. The area of the hot spot, $A_{HS}=H_DHS_{SM}$, remains unchanged because the hot spot is only on the front portion of the disk. Therefore, it does not take up the full projected disk height. We note that we do not have to account for the cancellation of polarized light due to the contribution from the interior of the disk. We are using our observations to estimate $qf_{DC}$ and $qf_{min}$, and these numbers should therefore already incorporate this effect, if it is present. However, we still make the assumption that each portion of the disk contributes to the polarized flux equally. Besides the complication due to limb darkening mentioned previously, this enlarges our size estimate because more area is needed to cancel out the same amount of polarized flux. Table \[HSSize\] gives the resulting hot spot size estimate for the *BVRI* bands when $i=86{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ using Equation 6.
In our estimates, the size of the hot spot is smaller when the inclination angle is $86{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ compared to $90{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ for the following reason. The area of the disk is larger in the $i=86{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ method compared to the $i=90{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ method by a factor of approximately 1.3. This causes the amount of polarized flux per unit area to decrease by a factor of 0.8. However, the area eclipsed by the primary star increases by more than a factor of two. Therefore, the amount of polarized light lost due to the hot spot is smaller when $i=86{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$ than when $i=90{\ensuremath{^\circ}}$.
Comparison and Review of Hot Spot Size Estimates
------------------------------------------------
Comparing all three methods, we find a wide range of sizes for the hot spot. The smallest size estimate is 2 R$_\sun$ (*I* band) while the largest is 58 R$_\sun$ (*V* band). The *R* and *I* band estimates are the most likely to change with additional data because their current phase coverage is not as good as the *B* and *V* bands. The *B* band estimates have the closest agreement between the three methods; they range from 22 R$_\sun$ to 33 R$_\sun$, while the *V* band estimates have the largest range, 9 R$_\sun$ to 58 R$_\sun$. The overlap region for size ranges in all the bands is 22 R$_\sun$ to 33 R$_\sun$.
The large size of our estimates lends support to the possibility that we are actually detecting the portion of the mass stream which has not interacted with the disk and not a hot spot, similar to the findings of Bisikalo et al. (2000). The largest hot spot size estimate, 58 R$_\sun$, is similar in size to the diameter of the disk, 60 R$_\sun$, and the same as the binary separation, 58 R$_\sun$. However, this scenario would not likely produce the phenomena seen in Figures \[Bband\] through \[Iband\] because light scattering from the mass stream would tend to have a position angle similar to that of the disk; therefore, we prefer a large hot spot interpretation.
The 22 R$_\sun$ to 33 R$_\sun$ range is likely an upper limit for the size of the hot spot for several reasons. The position angle method (see Section 4.2) relies on using the randomization of position angles around secondary eclipse. We determined the length of time that the randomization in position angle lasts by using data from multiple orbits of the system. If the spot varies, either in size or location, on time scale similar to the orbital period, this variation would cause our estimate to be larger than the actual size of the hot spot. Also, we made the assumption that the hot spot contributes only unpolarized light to the observations. It is possible that the hot spot contributes light polarized at a different position angle than light polarized in the disk. This would cause a cancellation effect to occur; light polarized in the hot spot would cancel some of the light polarized in the disk. In this case, our estimate would again be larger than the area of the hot spot.
If the hot spot is indeed larger than 30 R$_\sun$, a portion of it may already be visible to the observer during primary eclipse. If this were the case, we would expect the polarization maxima in the affected bands to shift from phase 0.0 to an earlier phase. This line of reasoning suggests that the primary eclipse effects seen in Figures \[Bband\] through \[Iband\], if real, may also be due to the hot spot (see Section 3.1). However, such a scenario does not explain why the *I* band polarization maximum occurs just after primary eclipse. The *R* band and three-term *V* band Fourier fits do not show an offset at primary eclipse, suggesting that the hot spot is not visible at this phase (see Section 3.1). We propose that the primary eclipse offsets are likely a result of the Fourier fits in some bands being less well determined around primary eclipse due to incomplete phase coverage.
The position angle scatter around primary eclipse in Figures \[Bband\] through \[Iband\] could also be interpreted as evidence that the hot spot is visible at this phase. As the system moves from primary eclipse to secondary eclipse, the amount of the hot spot visible to the observer should only increase if the time scale for changes in the hot spot is large compared to the orbital period. This suggests that if the scatter in the position angle of the 1997 August 25 observations (squares between phases 0.000 and 0.015 in Figures \[Bband\] through \[Iband\]) is due to the hot spot, then a similar scatter should also exist in observations where the hot spot was fully visible during the same orbit. In particular, the 1997 August 26 (phase 0.079) and 1997 August 30 (phase 0.385) observations should show this effect. However, these two observations appear to have a position angle more similar to the system average than the 1997 August 25 observations. If that the mass transfer rate varies on time scales shorter than an orbital period, then the hot spot size may have changed over this five-day period to change the amount of position angle scatter. This scenario would explain the position angle scatter at primary eclipse for a single cycle, but it would not address the fact that no other orbits of the system were observed to have a position angle scatter near primary eclipse. The combination of the arguments for and against the visibility of the hot spot at primary eclipse does not clearly determine whether its effects are discernible near phase 0.0. Multiple spectropolarimetric observations from the same orbit near primary eclipse will provide more insight into the cause of this phenomena and access its repeatability. In particular, the evolution of the color index of the polarized flux through primary eclipse compared to the evolution of the color index of the total light flux may shed new light on this situation.
Harmanec et al (1996) derived the location of the ‘roots’ of the bipolar outflows, where the bipolar outflows originate within the disk, using the H$\alpha$ absorption core and the H$\alpha$ emission wings seen in many epochs of spectra (see Figure 1 in [@Harmanec2002] for an artist’s view of the location of the outflows). The location of the roots (marked by a filled square in Figure \[HotSpotSize\] for the H$\alpha$ absorption and by a filled star for H$\alpha$ emission) is in the same quadrant of the disk in which we interpret the hot spot being located. However, the location of the roots is in the interior of the disk while we suggest the hot spot is a disruption in the structure of the disk edge. Certainly the bipolar outflows and the hot spot are related; both components are the result of the system’s high mass transfer rate. How far into the interior of the disk the hot spot reaches is unknown. Additionally, the disk is made up of two components: a dense inner disk and an outer less dense disk [@Skulskii]. What constitutes the ‘disk edge’ where the hot spot disruption occurs is unclear, although we have assumed it is the outermost edge of the disk (whose diameter is 60 R$_\sun$) in our size estimates. Because the scattering region for the H$\alpha$ line is thought to be the bipolar outflows (HNF), future high precision H$\alpha$ line polarization measurements may be able to link the two structures. If the hot spot location is consistent with the roots of the outflows, we expect the H$\alpha$ line polarization to show a secondary minimum offset, similar to those characterizing the broadband curves (Figures \[Bband\] through \[Iband\]), while maintaining a position angle consistent with the outflows. Radial velocity curves of the H$\alpha$ line’s polarized flux may also provide valuable insight into the relationship between the hot spot and bipolar outflows.
SUMMARY
=======
We have presented a large new data set of polarimetric observations of $\beta$ Lyr in the *BVRI* bands and the first Fourier fits to the polarimetric variations in these bands and the $\lambda$5876 emission line. We have interpreted the minimum in the *BVRI* projected polarization prior to secondary eclipse and the associated position angle rotations as the first direct evidence for a hot spot on the edge of the accretion disk in the $\beta$ Lyr system. Using the phases of polarization minimum, the scatter of the position angle and a simple model, we have estimated the maximum size of the hot spot to be between 22 and 33 R$_\sun$ across the face of the disk. More extensive polarimetric modeling of $\beta$ Lyr is needed in order to fully understand these results. Insights into the importance of the effects at primary eclipse and more accurate estimates of the hot spot size could be derived from such models.
We expect the hot spot may also be detectable in X-rays. Both ROSAT HRI (Berghofer & Schmitt 1994) and Suzaku (Ignace et al. 2008) have detected strong and variable hard X-ray emission from $\beta$ Lyr. However, neither set of observations has provided information on the origin of the X-ray emission or observed the system at phases at which we see the hot spot effects. An X-ray light curve with more complete phase coverage will help locate the source of the X-ray emission.
The large uncertainties and scatter in Figure \[HeI5876\] make it difficult to pinpoint a location for the origin of the jets with confidence. Future, higher-precision line polarization measurements will provide much needed insights and determine their source.
Advancements in technology will soon allow for the combination of long-baseline optical interferometry with polarimetry [@Elias2008]. We expect such a technological development will provide new and exciting geometrical insights into the $\beta$ Lyr system and others like it.
We are very grateful to Brian Babler, Marilyn Meade, and Ken Nordsieck for their help with the HPOL data and to all of the members of the PBO science team for obtaining the HPOL data used in this paper. We are indebted to the late R.H. Koch for his observing efforts at FCO and to his wife Joanne for allowing us to use those data. We also thank Keivan Stassun for his help with the period analysis, and Petr Harmanec for providing us with unpolarized *UBVRI* light curves of $\beta$ Lyr and his helpful referee comments. We have had useful conversations with many colleagues: Kathleen Geise, Paul Hemenway, K. Tabetha Hole, Richard Ignace, Brian Kloppenborg, Robert Stencel, and Toshyia Ueta. JRL acknowledges support through the NASA Harriett G. Jenkins Pre-doctoral Fellowship Program and Sigma Xi’s Grants-in-Aid of Research Program. JLH acknowledges support though NASA ADP award NNH08CD10C and NSF award AST-0807477. FAB acknowledges support from NSF grant AST-0849736 (K. Stassun, PI) and from a GAANN Fellowship.
Abt, H. A., Jeffers, H. M., Gibson, J., & Sandage, A. R. 1962, , 135, 429 Ak, H., et al. 2007, , 463, 233 Appenzeller, I. 1965, , 141, 1390 Appenzeller, I., & Hiltner, W. A. 1967, , 149, 353 Bisikalo, D. V., Harmanec, P., Boyarchuk, A. A., Kuznetsov, O. A., & Hadrava, P. 2000, , 353, 1009 Elias, N. M., II, Koch, R. H., & Holenstein, B. D. 1996, , 28, 913 Elias, N. M., II, Jones, C. E., Schmitt, H. R., Jorgensen, A. M., Ireland, M. J., & Perraut, K. 2008, arXiv:0811.3139 Harmanec, P. 2002, Astronomische Nachrichten, 323, 87 Harmanec, P., et al. 1996, , 312, 879 Harmanec, P., & Scholz, G. 1993, , 279, 131 Holenstein, B. D. 1991, Ph.D. Thesis Hoffman, J. L., Nordsieck, K. H., & Fox, G. K. 1998, , 115, 1576 Hoffman, J. L., Whitney, B. A., & Nordsieck, K. H. 2003, , 598, 572 Horne, J. H., & Baliunas, S. L. 1986, , 302, 757 Huang, S.-S. 1963, , 138, 342 Hubeny, I., & Plavec, M. J. 1991, , 102, 1156 Lubow, S. H., & Shu, F. H. 1975, , 198, 383 Lenz, P., & Breger, M. 2005, Communications in Asteroseismology, 146, 53 Linnell, A. P., Hubeny, I., & Harmanec, P. 1998, , 509, 379 Linnell, A. P. 2000, , 319, 255 Nazarenko, V. V., & Glazunova, L. V. 2006, Astronomy Reports, 50, 369 Nordsieck, K. H., & Harris, W. 1996, Polarimetry of the Interstellar Medium, 97, 100 hman, Y. 1934, , 134, 534 Peel, M. 1997, , 284, 148 Schmitt, H. R., et al. 2009, , 691, 984 Serkowski, K. 1965, , 142, 793 Shakhovskoi, N. M. 1963, Soviet Astronomy, 6, 587 Shulov, O. S. 1967, Proc. Astr. Obs. Leningrad Univ., 24, 38 Skulskii, M. Y. 1992, Letters, 18, 287 Wilking, B. A., Lebofsky, M. J., & Rieke, G. H. 1982, , 87, 695 Wilson, R. E. 1974, , 189, 319 Wilson, R. E., & van Hamme, W. 1999, , 303, 736 Wolff, M. J., Nordsieck, K. H., & Nook, M. A. 1996, , 111, 856 Zhao, M., et al. 2008, , 684, L95
[lcc]{}\
1992 Sep 30 &48895.71 &0.661\
1992 Oct 6 &48901.67 &0.121\
1992 Oct 13 &48908.60 &0.657\
1992 Oct 27 &48922.58 &0.737\
1992 Dec 28 &48984.52 &0.525\
1993 Jul 26 &49194.60 &0.762\
1994 Jun 3 &49506.78 &0.890\
1994 Jun 30 &49533.59 &0.962\
1994 Jul 22 &49555.66 &0.668\
1994 Jul 29 &49562.62 &0.206\
1994 Jul 31 &49564.59 &0.358\
1994 Sep 8 &49603.53 &0.368\
1994 Sep 20 &49615.49 &0.292\
1994 Nov 7 &49663.46 &0.000\
\
1995 Mar 14 &49790.89 &0.848\
1995 May 5 &49842.82 &0.862\
1995 May 26 &49863.82 &0.485\
1995 May 27 &49864.78 &0.559\
1995 May 30 &49867.84 &0.796\
1995 Jun 4 &49872.86 &0.184\
1995 Jul 3 &49901.66 &0.410\
1995 Jul 10 &49908.72 &0.955\
1995 Jul 12 &49910.82 &0.117\
1995 Jul 18 &49916.70 &0.572\
1995 Jul 24 &49922.79 &0.043\
1995 Aug 6 &49935.68 &0.039\
1995 Aug 14 &49943.63 &0.653\
1995 Aug 18 &49947.72 &0.969\
1995 Sep 10 &49970.74 &0.749\
\
1996 Aug 21 &50316.65 &0.483\
1997 May 17 &50585.78 &0.283\
1997 May 26 &50594.80 &0.980\
1997 Jul 5 &50634.82 &0.073\
1997 Jul 7 &50636.72 &0.219\
1997 Jul 7 &50636.80 &0.226\
1997 Jul 10 &50639.67 &0.447\
1997 Jul 10 &50639.77 &0.455\
1997 Jul 10 &50639.87 &0.463\
1997 Jul 11 &50640.68 &0.525\
1997 Jul 11 &50640.79 &0.534\
1997 Jul 15 &50644.66 &0.833\
1997 Jul 15 &50644.77 &0.842\
1997 Jul 15 &50644.86 &0.848\
1997 Jul 16 &50645.68 &0.912\
1997 Jul 16 &50645.78 &0.920\
1997 Jul 18 &50647.71 &0.069\
1997 Aug 1 &50661.64 &0.145\
1997 Aug 25 &50685.64 &0.000\
1997 Aug 25 &50685.74 &0.008\
1997 Aug 25 &50685.83 &0.015\
1997 Aug 26 &50686.66 &0.079\
1997 Aug 30 &50690.62 &0.385\
1997 Sep 7 &50698.63 &0.004\
1997 Sep 7 &50698.71 &0.010\
1997 Sep 12 &50703.77 &0.401\
1997 Sep 21 &50712.64 &0.087\
1997 Sep 25 &50716.73 &0.403\
1997 Oct 3 &50724.60 &0.011\
1997 Oct 3 &50724.70 &0.019\
1997 Oct 4 &50725.57 &0.086\
1997 Oct 28 &50749.54 &0.939\
1997 Nov 17 &50769.56 &0.486\
1997 Dec 15 &50797.50 &0.645\
1998 Apr 19 &50922.86 &0.333\
1998 Apr 24 &50927.90 &0.723\
1998 Jun 23 &50987.82 &0.354\
1998 Jul 31 &51025.78 &0.287\
1998 Aug 31 &51056.62 &0.671\
1998 Sep 8 &51064.76 &0.300\
\
1995 May 21 &49858.85 &\
1996 Jul 3 &50267.75 &\
\
1998 Dec 8 &51155.54 &\
1998 Dec 11 &51158.53 &\
1998 Dec 12 &51159.52 &\
1999 Aug 30 &51420.63 &\
1999 Sep 13 &51434.64 &\
1999 Oct 3 &51454.59 &\
1999 Nov 1 &51483.60 &\
1999 Nov 2 &51484.57 &\
1999 Nov 15 &51497.55 &\
[lcc]{}\
1989 Apr 12 & 47628.88 & 0.753\
1989 Apr 20 & 47636.85 & 0.352\
1989 Apr 23 & 47639.85 & 0.583\
1989 May 29 & 47675.80 & 0.366\
1989 Jun 5 & 47682.78 & 0.907\
1989 Jun 12 & 47689.80 & 0.448\
1989 Jun 19 & 47696.78 & 0.989\
1989 Jun 30 & 47707.76 & 0.840\
1989 Jul 2 & 47709.79 & 0.994\
1989 Jul 25 & 47732.74 & 0.772\
1989 Jul 29 & 47736.79 & 0.081\
1989 Aug 31 & 47769.68 & 0.632\
1989 Sep 3 & 47772.58 & 0.844\
1989 Sep 4 & 47773.57 & 0.922\
1989 Sep 5 & 47774.57 & 0.999\
1989 Sep 9 & 47778.57 & 0.308\
1989 Oct 5 & 47804.45 & 0.318\
1989 Oct 8 & 47807.60 & 0.550\
1992 Jun 4 & 48777.76 & 0.543\
\
1987 Aug 11 & 47018.61 & 0.563\
1987 Aug 13 & 47020.57 & 0.718\
1987 Aug 15 & 47022.59 & 0.872\
1987 Aug 16 & 47023.58 & 0.949\
1987 Aug 18 & 47025.54 & 0.104\
1987 Aug 18 & 47025.56 & 0.104\
1987 Aug 20 & 47027.59 & 0.259\
1987 Aug 21 & 47028.58 & 0.336\
1987 Aug 22 & 47029.56 & 0.413\
1987 Aug 24 & 47031.58 & 0.568\
1987 Sep 15 & 47053.57 & 0.268\
1987 Sep 26 & 47064.55 & 0.119\
1987 Sep 27 & 47065.54 & 0.196\
1987 Sep 28 & 47066.55 & 0.273\
1987 Oct 5 & 47073.55 & 0.814\
1987 Oct 6 & 47074.53 & 0.892\
1988 Jun 13 & 47325.80 & 0.313\
1988 Jun 24 & 47336.80 & 0.163\
1988 Jun 28 & 47340.61 & 0.453\
1988 Jul 1 & 47343.62 & 0.685\
1988 Jul 16 & 47358.66 & 0.863\
1988 Aug 19 & 47392.69 & 0.491\
1988 Aug 22 & 47395.68 & 0.723\
1988 Aug 23 & 47396.59 & 0.781\
1988 Sep 1 & 47405.62 & 0.477\
1988 Sep 2 & 47406.58 & 0.554\
1988 Sep 3 & 47407.59 & 0.631\
1988 Sep 7 & 47411.56 & 0.941\
1988 Sep 8 & 47412.55 & 0.018\
1988 Sep 11 & 47415.55 & 0.250\
1988 Sep 15 & 47419.55 & 0.559\
1988 Sep 16 & 47420.55 & 0.636\
1988 Sep 27 & 47431.54 & 0.487\
1988 Sep 28 & 47432.50 & 0.564\
1988 Sep 29 & 47433.53 & 0.641\
1988 Oct 1 & 47435.57 & 0.796\
1988 Oct 2 & 47436.54 & 0.873\
1988 Oct 6 & 47440.56 & 0.182\
1988 Oct 10 & 47444.52 & 0.491\
1988 Oct 14 & 47448.52 & 0.801\
1988 Oct 15 & 47449.57 & 0.878\
1988 Oct 26 & 47460.47 & 0.728\
1988 Oct 27 & 47461.57 & 0.805\
1988 Oct 28 & 47462.53 & 0.883\
1988 Oct 30 & 47464.50 & 0.037\
1988 Oct 31 & 47465.49 & 0.115\
1988 Nov 4 & 47469.50 & 0.424\
1988 Nov 10 & 47475.53 & 0.888\
1988 Nov 14 & 47479.50 & 0.197\
1988 Nov 15 & 47480.47 & 0.274\
1988 Nov 18 & 47483.49 & 0.506\
1989 Apr 12 & 47628.85 & 0.733\
1989 Apr 20 & 47636.83 & 0.352\
1989 Apr 23 & 47639.83 & 0.583\
1989 May 29 & 47675.78 & 0.366\
1989 Jun 5 & 47682.80 & 0.907\
1989 Jun 12 & 47689.82 & 0.448\
1989 Jun 19 & 47696.80 & 0.989\
1989 Jun 30 & 47707.78 & 0.840\
1989 Jul 2 & 47709.81 & 0.994\
1989 Jul 25 & 47732.76 & 0.772\
1989 Jul 29 & 47736.82 & 0.081\
1989 Aug 31 & 47769.70 & 0.632\
1989 Sep 3 & 47772.60 & 0.844\
1989 Sep 4 & 47773.61 & 0.922\
1989 Sep 5 & 47774.60 & 0.999\
1989 Sep 9 & 47778.60 & 0.308\
1989 Oct 2 & 47801.68 & 0.105\
1989 Oct 23 & 47822.59 & 0.709\
1992 Jun 13 & 48786.72 & 0.239\
1992 Jun 18 & 48791.65 & 0.625\
1992 Jun 21 & 48794.62 & 0.838\
1992 Jun 28 & 48801.73 & 0.398\
1992 Jun 29 & 48802.67 & 0.476\
1992 Jul 6 & 48809.68 & 0.017\
1992 Jul 8 & 48811.59 & 0.152\
1992 Jul 19 & 48822.60 & 0.002\
1992 Jul 29 & 48832.57 & 0.775\
1992 Jul 30 & 48833.58 & 0.852\
1992 Aug 2 & 48836.61 & 0.084\
1992 Aug 3 & 48837.60 & 0.161\
1992 Aug 5 & 48839.60 & 0.316\
1992 Aug 8 & 48842.56 & 0.548\
1992 Aug 11 & 48845.56 & 0.780\
1992 Aug 19 & 48853.54 & 0.398\
1992 Aug 30 & 48864.56 & 0.248\
1992 Sep 1 & 48866.60 & 0.403\
1992 Sep 13 & 48878.55 & 0.330\
\
1989 Apr 12 & 47628.90 & 0.753\
1989 Apr 20 & 47636.81 & 0.352\
1989 Apr 23 & 47639.79 & 0.583\
1989 May 29 & 47675.76 & 0.366\
1989 Jun 5 & 47682.83 & 0.907\
1989 Jun 12 & 47689.84 & 0.448\
1989 Jun 19 & 47696.82 & 0.989\
1989 Jun 30 & 47707.80 & 0.840\
1989 Jul 2 & 47709.83 & 0.994\
1989 Jul 25 & 47732.78 & 0.772\
1989 Jul 29 & 47736.84 & 0.081\
1989 Aug 31 & 47769.72 & 0.632\
1989 Sep 3 & 47772.62 & 0.844\
1989 Sep 5 & 47774.62 & 0.999\
1989 Sep 9 & 47778.62 & 0.308\
1989 Oct 2 & 47801.65 & 0.105\
1989 Oct 10 & 47809.61 & 0.704\
[lccccccc]{} 0.081 & 47736.79 & 0.395 & -0.432 & 0.164 & -0.067 & 0.007 & 0.007\
0.308 & 47778.57 & 0.579 & -0.493 & 0.348 & -0.128 & 0.016 & 0.014\
0.318 & 47804.45 & 0.617 & -0.527 & 0.386 & -0.162 & 0.010 & 0.008\
0.352 & 47636.85 & 0.405 & -0.438 & 0.174 & -0.073 & 0.008 & 0.008\
0.366 & 47675.80 & 0.549 & -0.520 & 0.318 & -0.155 & 0.009 & 0.008\
0.448 & 47689.80 & 0.257 & -0.261 & 0.026 & 0.104 & 0.007 & 0.007\
0.543 & 48777.76 & 0.148 & -0.350 & -0.083 & 0.015 & 0.009 & 0.009\
0.550 & 47807.60 & 0.460 & -0.698 & 0.229 & -0.333 & 0.016 & 0.023\
0.583 & 47639.85 & 0.421 & -0.527 & 0.190 & -0.162 & 0.008 & 0.010\
0.632 & 47769.68 & 0.497 & -0.517 & 0.266 & -0.152 & 0.010 & 0.010\
0.753 & 47628.88 & 0.538 & -0.479 & 0.307 & -0.114 & 0.014 & 0.012\
0.772 & 47732.74 & 0.486 & -0.494 & 0.255 & -0.129 & 0.011 & 0.011\
0.840 & 47707.76 & 0.416 & -0.469 & 0.185 & -0.104 & 0.007 & 0.008\
0.844 & 47772.58 & 0.406 & -0.476 & 0.175 & -0.111 & 0.009 & 0.011\
0.907 & 47682.78 & 0.531 & -0.488 & 0.300 & -0.123 & 0.012 & 0.011\
0.922 & 47773.57 & 0.470 & -0.456 & 0.239 & -0.091 & 0.010 & 0.010\
0.989 & 47696.78 & 0.602 & -0.566 & 0.371 & -0.201 & 0.010 & 0.010\
0.994 & 47709.79 & 0.635 & -0.558 & 0.404 & -0.193 & 0.018 & 0.016\
0.999 & 47774.57 & 0.553 & -0.645 & 0.322 & -0.280 & 0.009 & 0.010\
[lccccccc]{} 0.002 & 48822.60 & 0.353 & -0.393 & 0.134 & -0.028 & 0.053 & 0.053\
0.017 & 48809.68 & 0.405 & -0.471 & 0.186 & -0.106 & 0.013 & 0.013\
0.018 & 47412.55 & 0.508 & -0.433 & 0.289 & -0.068 & 0.010 & 0.009\
0.037 & 47464.50 & 0.687 & -0.704 & 0.468 & -0.339 & 0.097 & 0.099\
0.081 & 47736.82 & 0.390 & -0.422 & 0.171 & -0.057 & 0.010 & 0.011\
0.084 & 48836.61 & 0.390 & -0.423 & 0.171 & -0.058 & 0.010 & 0.010\
0.104 & 47025.54 & 0.287 & -0.412 & 0.068 & -0.047 & 0.014 & 0.019\
0.104 & 47025.56 & 0.292 & -0.437 & 0.073 & -0.072 & 0.008 & 0.012\
0.105 & 47801.68 & 0.548 & -0.458 & 0.329 & -0.093 & 0.010 & 0.009\
0.115 & 47465.49 & 0.310 & -0.418 & 0.091 & -0.053 & 0.006 & 0.008\
0.119 & 47064.55 & 0.335 & -0.454 & 0.116 & -0.089 & 0.008 & 0.011\
0.152 & 48811.59 & 0.440 & -0.416 & 0.221 & -0.051 & 0.012 & 0.012\
0.161 & 48837.60 & 0.442 & -0.438 & 0.223 & -0.073 & 0.010 & 0.010\
0.163 & 47336.80 & 0.370 & -0.390 & 0.151 & -0.025 & 0.092 & 0.096\
0.182 & 47440.56 & 0.519 & -0.431 & 0.300 & -0.066 & 0.012 & 0.010\
0.196 & 47065.54 & 0.397 & -0.457 & 0.178 & -0.092 & 0.009 & 0.010\
0.197 & 47479.50 & 0.451 & -0.474 & 0.232 & -0.109 & 0.015 & 0.016\
0.239 & 48786.72 & 0.322 & -0.454 & 0.103 & -0.089 & 0.015 & 0.015\
0.248 & 48864.56 & 0.500 & -0.510 & 0.281 & -0.145 & 0.006 & 0.006\
0.250 & 47415.55 & 0.492 & -0.466 & 0.273 & -0.101 & 0.014 & 0.013\
0.259 & 47027.59 & 0.412 & -0.441 & 0.193 & -0.076 & 0.009 & 0.010\
0.268 & 47053.57 & 0.420 & -0.433 & 0.201 & -0.068 & 0.007 & 0.007\
0.273 & 47066.55 & 0.493 & -0.448 & 0.274 & -0.083 & 0.008 & 0.008\
0.274 & 47480.47 & 0.549 & -0.570 & 0.330 & -0.205 & 0.011 & 0.011\
0.308 & 47778.60 & 0.560 & -0.461 & 0.341 & -0.096 & 0.013 & 0.011\
0.313 & 47325.80 & 0.408 & -0.419 & 0.189 & -0.054 & 0.009 & 0.009\
0.316 & 48839.60 & 0.526 & -0.492 & 0.307 & -0.127 & 0.008 & 0.008\
0.330 & 48878.55 & 0.580 & -0.475 & 0.361 & -0.110 & 0.012 & 0.012\
0.336 & 47028.58 & 0.461 & -0.423 & 0.242 & -0.058 & 0.008 & 0.008\
0.352 & 47636.83 & 0.391 & -0.421 & 0.172 & -0.056 & 0.008 & 0.009\
0.366 & 47675.78 & 0.556 & -0.495 & 0.337 & -0.130 & 0.012 & 0.011\
0.398 & 48801.73 & 0.455 & -0.428 & 0.236 & -0.063 & 0.021 & 0.021\
0.398 & 48853.54 & 0.332 & -0.397 & 0.113 & -0.032 & 0.012 & 0.012\
0.403 & 48866.60 & 0.492 & -0.401 & 0.273 & -0.036 & 0.009 & 0.009\
0.413 & 47029.56 & 0.312 & -0.268 & 0.093 & 0.097 & 0.044 & 0.039\
0.424 & 47469.50 & 0.405 & -0.414 & 0.186 & -0.049 & 0.008 & 0.008\
0.448 & 47689.82 & 0.269 & -0.273 & 0.050 & 0.092 & 0.007 & 0.007\
0.453 & 47340.61 & 0.318 & -0.282 & 0.099 & 0.083 & 0.009 & 0.008\
0.476 & 48802.67 & 0.233 & -0.198 & 0.014 & 0.167 & 0.017 & 0.017\
0.477 & 47405.62 & 0.328 & -0.268 & 0.109 & 0.097 & 0.006 & 0.005\
0.487 & 47431.54 & 0.430 & -0.413 & 0.211 & -0.048 & 0.008 & 0.007\
0.491 & 47392.69 & 0.281 & -0.349 & 0.062 & 0.016 & 0.009 & 0.011\
0.491 & 47444.52 & 0.434 & -0.432 & 0.215 & -0.067 & 0.013 & 0.010\
0.506 & 47483.49 & 0.501 & -0.401 & 0.282 & -0.036 & 0.011 & 0.009\
0.548 & 48842.56 & 0.316 & -0.455 & 0.097 & -0.090 & 0.019 & 0.019\
0.554 & 47406.58 & 0.354 & -0.345 & 0.135 & 0.020 & 0.010 & 0.009\
0.559 & 47419.55 & 0.341 & -0.468 & 0.122 & -0.103 & 0.007 & 0.009\
0.563 & 47018.61 & 0.355 & -0.389 & 0.136 & -0.024 & 0.007 & 0.008\
0.564 & 47432.50 & 0.372 & -0.445 & 0.153 & -0.080 & 0.013 & 0.016\
0.568 & 47031.58 & 0.322 & -0.402 & 0.103 & -0.037 & 0.006 & 0.008\
0.583 & 47639.83 & 0.421 & -0.501 & 0.202 & -0.136 & 0.013 & 0.015\
0.625 & 48791.65 & 0.517 & -0.523 & 0.298 & -0.158 & 0.004 & 0.004\
0.631 & 47407.59 & 0.514 & -0.438 & 0.295 & -0.073 & 0.011 & 0.009\
0.632 & 47769.70 & 0.475 & -0.469 & 0.256 & -0.104 & 0.012 & 0.011\
0.636 & 47420.55 & 0.328 & -0.247 & 0.109 & 0.118 & 0.009 & 0.007\
0.641 & 47433.53 & 0.575 & -0.390 & 0.356 & -0.025 & 0.013 & 0.010\
0.685 & 47343.62 & 0.507 & -0.438 & 0.288 & -0.073 & 0.010 & 0.009\
0.709 & 47822.59 & 0.508 & -0.488 & 0.289 & -0.123 & 0.009 & 0.008\
0.718 & 47020.57 & 0.521 & -0.398 & 0.302 & -0.033 & 0.012 & 0.010\
0.723 & 47395.68 & 0.558 & -0.473 & 0.339 & -0.108 & 0.011 & 0.009\
0.728 & 47460.47 & 0.478 & -0.470 & 0.259 & -0.105 & 0.009 & 0.009\
0.733 & 47628.85 & 0.518 & -0.459 & 0.299 & -0.094 & 0.009 & 0.008\
0.772 & 47732.76 & 0.480 & -0.449 & 0.261 & -0.084 & 0.011 & 0.010\
0.775 & 48832.57 & 0.508 & -0.491 & 0.289 & -0.126 & 0.011 & 0.011\
0.780 & 48845.56 & 0.458 & -0.477 & 0.239 & -0.112 & 0.010 & 0.010\
0.781 & 47396.59 & 0.483 & -0.419 & 0.264 & -0.054 & 0.010 & 0.009\
0.796 & 47435.57 & 0.462 & -0.417 & 0.243 & -0.052 & 0.010 & 0.009\
0.801 & 47448.52 & 0.422 & -0.446 & 0.203 & -0.081 & 0.007 & 0.007\
0.805 & 47461.57 & 0.421 & -0.424 & 0.202 & -0.059 & 0.010 & 0.010\
0.814 & 47073.55 & 0.435 & -0.403 & 0.216 & -0.038 & 0.009 & 0.008\
0.838 & 48794.62 & 0.503 & -0.456 & 0.284 & -0.091 & 0.006 & 0.006\
0.840 & 47707.78 & 0.411 & -0.410 & 0.192 & -0.045 & 0.007 & 0.007\
0.844 & 47772.60 & 0.376 & -0.425 & 0.157 & -0.060 & 0.008 & 0.009\
0.852 & 48833.58 & 0.391 & -0.432 & 0.172 & -0.067 & 0.011 & 0.011\
0.863 & 47358.66 & 0.435 & -0.357 & 0.216 & 0.008 & 0.009 & 0.008\
0.872 & 47022.59 & 0.451 & -0.640 & 0.232 & -0.275 & 0.011 & 0.010\
0.873 & 47436.54 & 0.467 & -0.437 & 0.248 & -0.072 & 0.012 & 0.011\
0.878 & 47449.57 & 0.374 & -0.388 & 0.155 & -0.023 & 0.009 & 0.009\
0.883 & 47462.53 & 0.389 & -0.397 & 0.170 & -0.032 & 0.007 & 0.008\
0.888 & 47475.53 & 0.308 & -0.376 & 0.089 & -0.011 & 0.006 & 0.007\
0.892 & 47074.53 & 0.376 & -0.396 & 0.157 & -0.031 & 0.010 & 0.011\
0.907 & 47682.80 & 0.468 & -0.442 & 0.249 & -0.077 & 0.011 & 0.011\
0.922 & 47773.61 & 0.451 & -0.407 & 0.232 & -0.042 & 0.008 & 0.008\
0.941 & 47411.56 & 0.547 & -0.396 & 0.328 & -0.031 & 0.013 & 0.010\
0.949 & 47023.58 & 0.540 & -0.490 & 0.321 & -0.125 & 0.010 & 0.009\
0.989 & 47696.80 & 0.558 & -0.509 & 0.339 & -0.144 & 0.016 & 0.015\
0.994 & 47709.81 & 0.623 & -0.496 & 0.404 & -0.131 & 0.016 & 0.013\
0.999 & 47774.60 & 0.514 & -0.603 & 0.295 & -0.238 & 0.012 & 0.014\
[lccccccc]{} 0.081 & 47736.84 & 0.318 & -0.373 & 0.131 & -0.077 & 0.007 & 0.008\
0.105 & 47801.65 & 0.454 & -0.432 & 0.267 & -0.136 & 0.011 & 0.011\
0.308 & 47778.62 & 0.503 & -0.431 & 0.316 & -0.135 & 0.008 & 0.007\
0.352 & 47636.81 & 0.376 & -0.374 & 0.189 & -0.078 & 0.012 & 0.012\
0.366 & 47675.76 & 0.504 & -0.489 & 0.317 & -0.193 & 0.018 & 0.017\
0.448 & 47689.84 & 0.261 & -0.267 & 0.074 & 0.029 & 0.006 & 0.007\
0.583 & 47639.79 & 0.377 & -0.450 & 0.190 & -0.154 & 0.009 & 0.011\
0.632 & 47769.72 & 0.412 & -0.443 & 0.225 & -0.147 & 0.013 & 0.014\
0.704 & 47809.61 & 0.830 & -0.779 & 0.643 & -0.483 & 0.017 & 0.016\
0.753 & 47628.90 & 0.452 & -0.417 & 0.265 & -0.121 & 0.014 & 0.013\
0.772 & 47732.78 & 0.398 & -0.398 & 0.211 & -0.102 & 0.009 & 0.009\
0.840 & 47707.80 & 0.359 & -0.373 & 0.172 & -0.077 & 0.009 & 0.004\
0.844 & 47772.62 & 0.330 & -0.372 & 0.143 & -0.076 & 0.007 & 0.007\
0.907 & 47682.83 & 0.391 & -0.443 & 0.204 & -0.147 & 0.012 & 0.021\
0.989 & 47696.82 & 0.449 & -0.417 & 0.262 & -0.121 & 0.011 & 0.010\
0.994 & 47709.83 & 0.524 & -0.438 & 0.337 & -0.142 & 0.017 & 0.015\
0.999 & 47774.62 & 0.463 & -0.522 & 0.276 & -0.226 & 0.013 & 0.014\
[lccccccc]{}\
0.000 & 49663.46 & 0.4323 & -0.6592 & 0.2020 & -0.2953 & 0.0019 & 0.0200\
0.121 & 48901.67 & 0.3905 & -0.4928 & 0.1603 & -0.1289 & 0.0030 & 0.0200\
0.206 & 49562.62 & 0.4691 & -0.4456 & 0.2388 & -0.0816 & 0.0062 & 0.0200\
0.292 & 49615.49 & 0.4248 & -0.5536 & 0.1945 & -0.1897 & 0.0015 & 0.0200\
0.358 & 49564.59 & 0.4874 & -0.4409 & 0.2572 & -0.0770 & 0.0023 & 0.0200\
0.368 & 49603.53 & 0.4823 & -0.4503 & 0.2521 & -0.0864 & 0.0016 & 0.0200\
0.525 & 48984.52 & 0.2897 & -0.4828 & 0.0594 & -0.1188 & 0.0034 & 0.0200\
0.657 & 48908.60 & 0.5574 & -0.5334 & 0.3272 & -0.1695 & 0.0030 & 0.0200\
0.661 & 48895.71 & 0.5392 & -0.5076 & 0.3090 & -0.1436 & 0.0023 & 0.0200\
0.668 & 49555.66 & 0.5611 & -0.5302 & 0.3308 & -0.1663 & 0.0015 & 0.0200\
0.737 & 48922.58 & 0.4881 & -0.5021 & 0.2578 & -0.1382 & 0.0019 & 0.0200\
0.762 & 49194.60 & 0.4841 & -0.5642 & 0.2538 & -0.2003 & 0.0011 & 0.0200\
0.890 & 49506.78 & 0.4337 & -0.4554 & 0.2027 & -0.0953 & 0.0033 & 0.0200\
0.962 & 49533.59 & 0.5317 & -0.6448 & 0.3015 & -0.2810 & 0.0019 & 0.0200\
\
0.000 & 50685.64 & 0.3794 & -0.8971 & 0.1492 & -0.5332 & 0.0044 & 0.0220\
0.004 & 50698.63 & 0.5419 & -0.4592 & 0.3117 & -0.0953 & 0.0031 & 0.0220\
0.008 & 50685.74 & 0.3222 & -0.8462 & 0.0920 & -0.4823 & 0.0046 & 0.0220\
0.010 & 50698.71 & 0.4679 & -0.4787 & 0.2377 & -0.1149 & 0.0063 & 0.0220\
0.011 & 50724.60 & 0.4846 & -0.5516 & 0.2544 & -0.1877 & 0.0035 & 0.0220\
0.015 & 50685.83 & 0.2608 & -0.8606 & 0.0326 & -0.4982 & 0.0082 & 0.0220\
0.019 & 50724.70 & 0.3952 & -0.5281 & 0.1650 & -0.1643 & 0.0053 & 0.0220\
0.039 & 49935.68 & 0.3981 & -0.6422 & 0.1679 & -0.2783 & 0.0030 & 0.0100\
0.043 & 49922.79 & 0.6360 & -0.5666 & 0.4058 & -0.2028 & 0.0034 & 0.0100\
0.069 & 50647.71 & 0.4896 & -0.5155 & 0.2594 & -0.1516 & 0.0036 & 0.0140\
0.073 & 50634.82 & 0.3301 & -0.3861 & 0.0999 & -0.0223 & 0.0024 & 0.0140\
0.079 & 50686.66 & 0.3372 & -0.5482 & 0.1070 & -0.1843 & 0.0029 & 0.0220\
0.086 & 50725.57 & 0.2982 & -0.3927 & 0.0680 & -0.0289 & 0.0033 & 0.0220\
0.087 & 50712.64 & 0.3415 & -0.5013 & 0.1113 & -0.1374 & 0.0029 & 0.0220\
0.117 & 49910.82 & 0.3875 & -0.4219 & 0.1573 & -0.0581 & 0.0023 & 0.0100\
0.145 & 50661.64 & 0.3608 & -0.4670 & 0.1307 & -0.1030 & 0.0027 & 0.0140\
0.184 & 49872.86 & 0.2940 & -0.4482 & 0.0638 & -0.0844 & 0.0027 & 0.0100\
0.219 & 50636.72 & 0.4525 & -0.5404 & 0.2223 & -0.1765 & 0.0028 & 0.0140\
0.226 & 50636.80 & 0.4000 & -0.5080 & 0.1698 & -0.1442 & 0.0024 & 0.0140\
0.283 & 50585.78 & 0.4840 & -0.6685 & 0.2538 & -0.3047 & 0.0018 & 0.0140\
0.287 & 51025.78 & 0.3671 & -0.5343 & 0.1368 & -0.1704 & 0.0028 & 0.0150\
0.300 & 51064.76 & 0.3961 & -0.6073 & 0.1659 & -0.2435 & 0.0054 & 0.0150\
0.333 & 50922.86 & 0.5179 & -0.5637 & 0.2877 & -0.1998 & 0.0025 & 0.0080\
0.354 & 50987.82 & 0.4517 & -0.5322 & 0.2215 & -0.1683 & 0.0025 & 0.0150\
0.385 & 50690.62 & 0.4775 & -0.5832 & 0.2473 & -0.2193 & 0.0031 & 0.0220\
0.401 & 50703.77 & 0.3079 & -0.4730 & 0.0777 & -0.1091 & 0.0029 & 0.0220\
0.403 & 50716.73 & 0.3754 & -0.4673 & 0.1453 & -0.1027 & 0.0057 & 0.0220\
0.410 & 49901.66 & 0.3475 & -0.3311 & 0.1174 & 0.0327 & 0.0024 & 0.0100\
0.447 & 50639.67 & 0.2957 & -0.3379 & 0.0655 & 0.0261 & 0.0025 & 0.0140\
0.455 & 50639.77 & 0.3165 & -0.3542 & 0.0863 & 0.0097 & 0.0028 & 0.0140\
0.463 & 50639.87 & 0.3221 & -0.4072 & 0.0920 & -0.0433 & 0.0047 & 0.0140\
0.483 & 50316.65 & 0.4778 & -0.4378 & 0.2475 & -0.0739 & 0.0020 & 0.0300\
0.485 & 49863.82 & 0.3250 & -0.3518 & 0.0948 & 0.0121 & 0.0022 & 0.0100\
0.486 & 50769.56 & 0.3433 & -0.4030 & 0.1131 & -0.0391 & 0.0041 & 0.0220\
0.525 & 50640.68 & 0.3457 & -0.5121 & 0.1155 & -0.1482 & 0.0029 & 0.0140\
0.534 & 50640.79 & 0.3062 & -0.5369 & 0.0760 & -0.1730 & 0.0099 & 0.0140\
0.572 & 49916.70 & 0.4309 & -0.4738 & 0.2006 & -0.1099 & 0.0020 & 0.0100\
0.645 & 50797.50 & 0.4821 & -0.5407 & 0.2519 & -0.1769 & 0.0050 & 0.0220\
0.671 & 51056.62 & 0.5691 & -0.5555 & 0.3388 & -0.1916 & 0.0024 & 0.0150\
0.723 & 50927.90 & 0.5293 & -0.6009 & 0.2990 & -0.2369 & 0.0051 & 0.0080\
0.749 & 49970.74 & 0.5268 & -0.4740 & 0.2965 & -0.1101 & 0.0020 & 0.0100\
0.796 & 49867.84 & 0.4758 & -0.5419 & 0.2455 & -0.1780 & 0.0017 & 0.0100\
0.833 & 50644.66 & 0.3884 & -0.5293 & 0.1581 & -0.1654 & 0.0024 & 0.0140\
0.842 & 50644.77 & 0.3740 & -0.5620 & 0.1438 & -0.1981 & 0.0026 & 0.0140\
0.848 & 49790.89 & 0.4561 & -0.5198 & 0.2259 & -0.1559 & 0.0033 & 0.0100\
0.848 & 50644.86 & 0.3216 & -0.5164 & 0.0914 & -0.1526 & 0.0025 & 0.0140\
0.862 & 49842.82 & 0.4337 & -0.4914 & 0.2035 & -0.1276 & 0.0023 & 0.0100\
0.912 & 50645.68 & 0.3993 & -0.4460 & 0.1691 & -0.0821 & 0.0024 & 0.0140\
0.920 & 50645.78 & 0.4319 & -0.4887 & 0.2017 & -0.1249 & 0.0041 & 0.0140\
0.939 & 50749.54 & 0.5136 & -0.7251 & 0.2834 & -0.3612 & 0.0035 & 0.0220\
0.955 & 49908.72 & 0.7422 & -0.5796 & 0.5120 & -0.2158 & 0.0051 & 0.0100\
0.969 & 49947.72 & 0.6624 & -0.5345 & 0.4322 & -0.1707 & 0.0041 & 0.0100\
0.980 & 50594.80 & 0.4666 & -0.7196 & 0.2365 & -0.3557 & 0.0082 & 0.0140\
[lccccccc]{}\
0.000 & 49663.46 & 0.4485 & -0.6204 & 0.2292 & -0.2737 & 0.0021 & 0.0200\
0.121 & 48901.67 & 0.3620 & -0.4839 & 0.1427 & -0.1373 & 0.0025 & 0.0200\
0.206 & 49562.62 & 0.4578 & -0.3863 & 0.2386 & -0.0398 & 0.0056 & 0.0200\
0.292 & 49615.49 & 0.4058 & -0.5298 & 0.1865 & -0.1830 & 0.0018 & 0.0200\
0.358 & 49564.59 & 0.4499 & -0.4464 & 0.2306 & -0.0998 & 0.0024 & 0.0200\
0.368 & 49603.53 & 0.4474 & -0.4376 & 0.2280 & -0.0909 & 0.0020 & 0.0200\
0.525 & 48984.52 & 0.2534 & -0.4453 & 0.0339 & -0.0985 & 0.0026 & 0.0200\
0.657 & 48908.60 & 0.5430 & -0.4910 & 0.3236 & -0.1444 & 0.0032 & 0.0200\
0.661 & 48895.71 & 0.4934 & -0.4758 & 0.2741 & -0.1291 & 0.0021 & 0.0200\
0.668 & 49555.66 & 0.5306 & -0.4902 & 0.3113 & -0.1435 & 0.0017 & 0.0200\
0.737 & 48922.58 & 0.4451 & -0.4905 & 0.2258 & -0.1438 & 0.0018 & 0.0200\
0.762 & 49194.60 & 0.4531 & -0.5427 & 0.2337 & -0.1960 & 0.0013 & 0.0200\
0.890 & 49506.78 & 0.3825 & -0.4272 & 0.1590 & -0.0808 & 0.0053 & 0.0200\
0.962 & 49533.59 & 0.5339 & -0.6376 & 0.3147 & -0.2910 & 0.0023 & 0.0200\
\
0.000 & 50685.64 & 0.3923 & -0.7974 & 0.1732 & -0.4508 & 0.0029 & 0.0100\
0.004 & 50698.63 & 0.5482 & -0.4414 & 0.3288 & -0.0948 & 0.0020 & 0.0100\
0.008 & 50685.74 & 0.3562 & -0.7982 & 0.1370 & -0.4516 & 0.0030 & 0.0100\
0.010 & 50698.71 & 0.5082 & -0.4602 & 0.2892 & -0.1139 & 0.0037 & 0.0100\
0.011 & 50724.60 & 0.5266 & -0.5742 & 0.3075 & -0.2280 & 0.0022 & 0.0100\
0.015 & 50685.83 & 0.3205 & -0.8314 & 0.1022 & -0.4861 & 0.0044 & 0.0100\
0.019 & 50724.70 & 0.4657 & -0.5516 & 0.2464 & -0.2053 & 0.0029 & 0.0100\
0.039 & 49935.68 & 0.4228 & -0.6091 & 0.2038 & -0.2631 & 0.0021 & 0.0050\
0.043 & 49922.79 & 0.6145 & -0.5334 & 0.3948 & -0.1860 & 0.0024 & 0.0050\
0.069 & 50647.71 & 0.4805 & -0.5109 & 0.2612 & -0.1644 & 0.0024 & 0.0070\
0.073 & 50634.82 & 0.3706 & -0.3841 & 0.1516 & -0.0382 & 0.0016 & 0.0070\
0.079 & 50686.66 & 0.3369 & -0.5427 & 0.1179 & -0.1966 & 0.0018 & 0.0100\
0.086 & 50725.57 & 0.3240 & -0.4117 & 0.1047 & -0.0652 & 0.0021 & 0.0100\
0.087 & 50712.64 & 0.3497 & -0.4760 & 0.1304 & -0.1295 & 0.0018 & 0.0100\
0.117 & 49910.82 & 0.3706 & -0.3946 & 0.1517 & -0.0479 & 0.0015 & 0.0050\
0.145 & 50661.64 & 0.3556 & -0.4517 & 0.1361 & -0.1047 & 0.0019 & 0.0070\
0.184 & 49872.86 & 0.3099 & -0.4214 & 0.0903 & -0.0756 & 0.0017 & 0.0050\
0.219 & 50636.72 & 0.4250 & -0.5151 & 0.2058 & -0.1685 & 0.0019 & 0.0070\
0.226 & 50636.80 & 0.3969 & -0.5070 & 0.1777 & -0.1604 & 0.0016 & 0.0070\
0.283 & 50585.78 & 0.4976 & -0.6274 & 0.2777 & -0.2799 & 0.0012 & 0.0070\
0.287 & 51025.78 & 0.3863 & -0.5250 & 0.1671 & -0.1785 & 0.0017 & 0.0100\
0.300 & 51064.76 & 0.3968 & -0.5232 & 0.1779 & -0.1771 & 0.0030 & 0.0100\
0.333 & 50922.86 & 0.5109 & -0.5433 & 0.2916 & -0.1967 & 0.0016 & 0.0050\
0.354 & 50987.82 & 0.4459 & -0.4969 & 0.2268 & -0.1506 & 0.0016 & 0.0100\
0.385 & 50690.62 & 0.4809 & -0.5536 & 0.2617 & -0.2070 & 0.0019 & 0.0100\
0.401 & 50703.77 & 0.3649 & -0.4747 & 0.1452 & -0.1273 & 0.0019 & 0.0100\
0.403 & 50716.73 & 0.3778 & -0.4680 & 0.1584 & -0.1217 & 0.0032 & 0.0100\
0.410 & 49901.66 & 0.3568 & -0.3198 & 0.1376 & 0.0266 & 0.0018 & 0.0050\
0.447 & 50639.67 & 0.3001 & -0.3333 & 0.0811 & 0.0132 & 0.0017 & 0.0070\
0.455 & 50639.77 & 0.3256 & -0.3258 & 0.1063 & 0.0209 & 0.0018 & 0.0070\
0.463 & 50639.87 & 0.3353 & -0.3521 & 0.1161 & -0.0056 & 0.0031 & 0.0070\
0.483 & 50316.65 & 0.4529 & -0.4384 & 0.2338 & -0.0928 & 0.0014 & 0.0200\
0.485 & 49863.82 & 0.3189 & -0.3351 & 0.1000 & 0.0106 & 0.0015 & 0.0050\
0.486 & 50769.56 & 0.3571 & -0.4099 & 0.1378 & -0.0634 & 0.0025 & 0.0100\
0.525 & 50640.68 & 0.3109 & -0.5088 & 0.0915 & -0.1620 & 0.0019 & 0.0070\
0.534 & 50640.79 & 0.2687 & -0.5048 & 0.0508 & -0.1606 & 0.0059 & 0.0070\
0.559 & 49864.78 & 0.5740 & -0.4877 & 0.3675 & -0.1488 & 0.0045 & 0.0050\
0.572 & 49916.70 & 0.4404 & -0.4434 & 0.2215 & -0.0974 & 0.0014 & 0.0050\
0.645 & 50797.50 & 0.4919 & -0.5245 & 0.2736 & -0.1783 & 0.0027 & 0.0100\
0.653 & 49943.63 & 0.6036 & -0.4925 & 0.3022 & -0.1452 & 0.0022 & 0.0050\
0.671 & 51056.62 & 0.5323 & -0.5334 & 0.3130 & -0.1869 & 0.0015 & 0.0100\
0.723 & 50927.90 & 0.4912 & -0.5611 & 0.2714 & -0.2138 & 0.0034 & 0.0050\
0.749 & 49970.74 & 0.5054 & -0.4378 & 0.2861 & -0.0908 & 0.0013 & 0.0050\
0.796 & 49867.84 & 0.4662 & -0.5150 & 0.2471 & -0.1688 & 0.0012 & 0.0050\
0.833 & 50644.66 & 0.3579 & -0.5014 & 0.1386 & -0.1549 & 0.0017 & 0.0070\
0.842 & 50644.77 & 0.3457 & -0.5039 & 0.1264 & -0.1573 & 0.0018 & 0.0070\
0.848 & 49790.89 & 0.4292 & -0.4756 & 0.2104 & -0.1292 & 0.0020 & 0.0050\
0.848 & 50644.86 & 0.3131 & -0.4951 & 0.0939 & -0.1483 & 0.0016 & 0.0070\
0.862 & 49842.82 & 0.4222 & -0.4591 & 0.2037 & -0.1134 & 0.0015 & 0.0050\
0.912 & 50645.68 & 0.3943 & -0.4385 & 0.1748 & -0.0918 & 0.0016 & 0.0070\
0.920 & 50645.78 & 0.3880 & -0.4313 & 0.1690 & -0.0849 & 0.0025 & 0.0070\
0.939 & 50749.54 & 0.4909 & -0.6709 & 0.2715 & -0.3242 & 0.0022 & 0.0100\
0.955 & 49908.72 & 0.6986 & -0.5220 & 0.4790 & -0.1747 & 0.0035 & 0.0050\
0.969 & 49947.72 & 0.6168 & -0.4929 & 0.3989 & -0.1476 & 0.0028 & 0.0050\
0.980 & 50594.80 & 0.4644 & -0.5950 & 0.2447 & -0.2476 & 0.0053 & 0.0070\
[lccccccc]{}\
0.000 & 49663.46 & 0.4242 & -0.5664 & 0.2205 & -0.2422 & 0.0027 & 0.0200\
0.121 & 48901.67 & 0.3360 & -0.4694 & 0.1341 & -0.1494 & 0.0038 & 0.0200\
0.206 & 49562.62 & 0.3777 & -0.3521 & 0.1861 & -0.0332 & 0.0067 & 0.0200\
0.292 & 49615.49 & 0.3735 & -0.4713 & 0.1709 & -0.1498 & 0.0025 & 0.0200\
0.358 & 49564.59 & 0.3955 & -0.4077 & 0.1947 & -0.0863 & 0.0032 & 0.0200\
0.368 & 49603.53 & 0.3917 & -0.4168 & 0.1852 & -0.0923 & 0.0027 & 0.0200\
0.525 & 48984.52 & 0.2297 & -0.4119 & 0.0295 & -0.0905 & 0.0032 & 0.0200\
0.657 & 48908.60 & 0.4936 & -0.4751 & 0.2912 & -0.1619 & 0.0045 & 0.0200\
0.661 & 48895.71 & 0.4402 & -0.4586 & 0.2373 & -0.1349 & 0.0033 & 0.0200\
0.668 & 49555.66 & 0.4711 & -0.4491 & 0.2711 & -0.1300 & 0.0022 & 0.0200\
0.737 & 48922.58 & 0.3817 & -0.4389 & 0.1567 & -0.1187 & 0.0042 & 0.0200\
0.762 & 49194.60 & 0.4064 & -0.4960 & 0.2035 & -0.1761 & 0.0018 & 0.0200\
0.890 & 49506.78 & 0.2308 & -0.5012 & 0.0096 & -0.1950 & 0.0098 & 0.0200\
0.962 & 49533.59 & 0.4678 & -0.5736 & 0.2714 & -0.2479 & 0.0035 & 0.0200\
\
0.000 & 50685.64 & 0.4015 & -0.6876 & 0.1993 & -0.3676 & 0.0020 & 0.0080\
0.004 & 50698.63 & 0.5123 & -0.4037 & 0.3090 & -0.0828 & 0.0014 & 0.0080\
0.008 & 50685.74 & 0.3668 & -0.7072 & 0.1640 & -0.3878 & 0.0019 & 0.0080\
0.010 & 50698.71 & 0.4717 & -0.3918 & 0.2708 & -0.0742 & 0.0019 & 0.0080\
0.011 & 50724.60 & 0.5048 & -0.5398 & 0.3034 & -0.2217 & 0.0014 & 0.0080\
0.015 & 50685.83 & 0.3437 & -0.7394 & 0.1418 & -0.4221 & 0.0036 & 0.0080\
0.019 & 50724.70 & 0.4562 & -0.5390 & 0.2541 & -0.2205 & 0.0017 & 0.0080\
0.039 & 49935.68 & 0.4169 & -0.5498 & 0.2151 & -0.2291 & 0.0014 & 0.0040\
0.043 & 49922.79 & 0.5921 & -0.5174 & 0.3832 & -0.1864 & 0.0025 & 0.0040\
0.069 & 50647.71 & 0.4405 & -0.4660 & 0.2384 & -0.1469 & 0.0015 & 0.0070\
0.073 & 50634.82 & 0.3695 & -0.3606 & 0.1678 & -0.0419 & 0.0010 & 0.0070\
0.079 & 50686.66 & 0.3101 & -0.5081 & 0.1085 & -0.1898 & 0.0011 & 0.0080\
0.086 & 50725.57 & 0.3175 & -0.4057 & 0.1147 & -0.0859 & 0.0013 & 0.0080\
0.087 & 50712.64 & 0.3317 & -0.4421 & 0.1289 & -0.1217 & 0.0012 & 0.0080\
0.117 & 49910.82 & 0.3510 & -0.3731 & 0.1492 & -0.0526 & 0.0010 & 0.0040\
0.145 & 50661.64 & 0.3317 & -0.4227 & 0.1267 & -0.0989 & 0.0015 & 0.0070\
0.184 & 49872.86 & 0.2922 & -0.3812 & 0.0882 & -0.0616 & 0.0011 & 0.0040\
0.219 & 50636.72 & 0.3710 & -0.4600 & 0.1691 & -0.1402 & 0.0012 & 0.0070\
0.226 & 50636.80 & 0.3663 & -0.4598 & 0.1638 & -0.1391 & 0.0011 & 0.0070\
0.283 & 50585.78 & 0.4810 & -0.5997 & 0.2692 & -0.2653 & 0.0015 & 0.0070\
0.287 & 51025.78 & 0.3534 & -0.4673 & 0.1512 & -0.1477 & 0.0011 & 0.0140\
0.300 & 51064.76 & 0.3697 & -0.4742 & 0.1683 & -0.1560 & 0.0018 & 0.0140\
0.333 & 50922.86 & 0.4735 & -0.4876 & 0.2710 & -0.1675 & 0.0010 & 0.0080\
0.354 & 50987.82 & 0.4001 & -0.4492 & 0.1984 & -0.1304 & 0.0010 & 0.0140\
0.385 & 50690.62 & 0.4323 & -0.4968 & 0.2300 & -0.1768 & 0.0012 & 0.0080\
0.401 & 50703.77 & 0.3302 & -0.4507 & 0.1257 & -0.1271 & 0.0015 & 0.0080\
0.403 & 50716.73 & 0.3535 & -0.4378 & 0.1509 & -0.1187 & 0.0020 & 0.0080\
0.410 & 49901.66 & 0.3238 & -0.2942 & 0.1197 & 0.0269 & 0.0012 & 0.0040\
0.447 & 50639.67 & 0.2888 & -0.3107 & 0.0874 & 0.0085 & 0.0011 & 0.0070\
0.455 & 50639.77 & 0.3009 & -0.3000 & 0.0987 & 0.0201 & 0.0011 & 0.0070\
0.463 & 50639.87 & 0.3125 & -0.3099 & 0.1106 & 0.0090 & 0.0017 & 0.0070\
0.483 & 50316.65 & 0.4170 & -0.3947 & 0.2131 & -0.0749 & 0.0009 & 0.0200\
0.485 & 49863.82 & 0.2997 & -0.2970 & 0.0976 & 0.0219 & 0.0010 & 0.0040\
0.486 & 50769.56 & 0.3217 & -0.3832 & 0.1196 & -0.0638 & 0.0014 & 0.0080\
0.525 & 50640.68 & 0.3155 & -0.4577 & 0.1120 & -0.1365 & 0.0014 & 0.0070\
0.534 & 50640.79 & 0.2685 & -0.4502 & 0.0701 & -0.1377 & 0.0016 & 0.0070\
0.559 & 49864.78 & 0.5560 & -0.4658 & 0.3583 & -0.1510 & 0.0022 & 0.0040\
0.572 & 49916.70 & 0.4179 & -0.3970 & 0.2160 & -0.0770 & 0.0009 & 0.0040\
0.645 & 50797.50 & 0.4237 & -0.4673 & 0.2253 & -0.1500 & 0.0015 & 0.0080\
0.653 & 49943.63 & 0.4946 & -0.4361 & 0.2744 & -0.1159 & 0.0011 & 0.0040\
0.671 & 51056.62 & 0.4657 & -0.4839 & 0.2640 & -0.1650 & 0.0009 & 0.0140\
0.723 & 50927.90 & 0.4251 & -0.5203 & 0.2193 & -0.1945 & 0.0028 & 0.0080\
0.749 & 49970.74 & 0.4687 & -0.4084 & 0.2651 & -0.0870 & 0.0009 & 0.0040\
0.796 & 49867.84 & 0.4310 & -0.4647 & 0.2274 & -0.1439 & 0.0008 & 0.0040\
0.833 & 50644.66 & 0.3140 & -0.4453 & 0.1120 & -0.1262 & 0.0010 & 0.0070\
0.842 & 50644.77 & 0.2980 & -0.4499 & 0.0959 & -0.1305 & 0.0011 & 0.0070\
0.848 & 49790.89 & 0.3819 & -0.4402 & 0.1778 & -0.1185 & 0.0014 & 0.0040\
0.848 & 50644.86 & 0.2874 & -0.4334 & 0.0851 & -0.1131 & 0.0012 & 0.0070\
0.862 & 49842.82 & 0.3860 & -0.4130 & 0.1842 & -0.0936 & 0.0010 & 0.0040\
0.912 & 50645.68 & 0.3574 & -0.3987 & 0.1543 & -0.0783 & 0.0011 & 0.0070\
0.920 & 50645.78 & 0.3495 & -0.3898 & 0.1483 & -0.0707 & 0.0014 & 0.0070\
0.939 & 50749.54 & 0.4245 & -0.5886 & 0.2219 & -0.2686 & 0.0015 & 0.0080\
0.955 & 49908.72 & 0.6552 & -0.4704 & 0.4477 & -0.1407 & 0.0039 & 0.0040\
0.969 & 49947.72 & 0.5424 & -0.4346 & 0.3401 & -0.1159 & 0.0016 & 0.0040\
0.980 & 50594.80 & 0.4749 & -0.5607 & 0.2626 & -0.2252 & 0.0059 & 0.0070\
[lccccccc]{}\
0.000 & 49663.46 & 0.3626 & -0.5178 & 0.1859 & -0.1806 & 0.0107 & 0.0200\
0.121 & 48901.67 & 0.3121 & -0.5255 & 0.1643 & -0.2718 & 0.0210 & 0.0200\
0.206 & 49562.62 & 0.2211 & -0.3197 & 0.2852 & -0.0712 & 0.0212 & 0.0200\
0.292 & 49615.49 & 0.2800 & -0.4636 & 0.1333 & -0.1712 & 0.0147 & 0.0200\
0.358 & 49564.59 & 0.2809 & -0.3208 & 0.1720 & -0.0486 & 0.0135 & 0.0200\
0.368 & 49603.53 & 0.3388 & -0.4346 & 0.1126 & -0.0753 & 0.0167 & 0.0200\
0.525 & 48984.52 & 0.2337 & -0.3604 & 0.1426 & -0.1002 & 0.0127 & 0.0200\
0.657 & 48908.60 & 0.4512 & -0.4725 & 0.2977 & -0.3356 & 0.0278 & 0.0200\
0.661 & 48895.71 & 0.3869 & -0.4243 & 0.2265 & -0.0991 & 0.0178 & 0.0200\
0.668 & 49555.66 & 0.4397 & -0.3904 & 0.3286 & -0.1580 & 0.0090 & 0.0200\
0.737 & 48922.58 & 0.2630 & -0.2777 & -0.2879 & -0.0631 & 0.0139 & 0.0200\
0.762 & 49194.60 & 0.3384 & -0.4473 & 0.1821 & -0.1987 & 0.0061 & 0.0200\
0.890 & 49506.78 & -0.3013 & -0.9340 & -0.4458 & -0.6993 & 0.0649 & 0.0200\
0.962 & 49533.59 & 0.4211 & -0.5398 & 0.3808 & -0.1714 & 0.0138 & 0.0200\
\
0.000 & 50685.64 & 0.3804 & -0.5442 & 0.2091 & -0.2734 & 0.0019 & 0.0080\
0.004 & 50698.63 & 0.4507 & -0.3146 & 0.2795 & -0.0439 & 0.0014 & 0.0080\
0.008 & 50685.74 & 0.3583 & -0.5498 & 0.1870 & -0.2790 & 0.0018 & 0.0080\
0.010 & 50698.71 & 0.4507 & -0.3272 & 0.2794 & -0.0564 & 0.0018 & 0.0080\
0.011 & 50724.60 & 0.4749 & -0.4690 & 0.3036 & -0.1983 & 0.0014 & 0.0080\
0.015 & 50685.83 & 0.3397 & -0.5846 & 0.1683 & -0.3138 & 0.0038 & 0.0080\
0.019 & 50724.70 & 0.4457 & -0.4810 & 0.2744 & -0.2102 & 0.0017 & 0.0080\
0.039 & 49935.68 & 0.3865 & -0.4621 & 0.2152 & -0.1913 & 0.0015 & 0.0070\
0.043 & 49922.79 & 0.5194 & -0.4285 & 0.3481 & -0.1578 & 0.0016 & 0.0070\
0.069 & 50647.71 & 0.3885 & -0.3872 & 0.2171 & -0.1163 & 0.0012 & 0.0080\
0.073 & 50634.82 & 0.3375 & -0.3073 & 0.1662 & -0.0366 & 0.0011 & 0.0080\
0.079 & 50686.66 & 0.2636 & -0.4484 & 0.0923 & -0.1777 & 0.0012 & 0.0080\
0.086 & 50725.57 & 0.2855 & -0.3658 & 0.1142 & -0.0951 & 0.0013 & 0.0080\
0.087 & 50712.64 & 0.2864 & -0.3721 & 0.1150 & -0.1013 & 0.0012 & 0.0080\
0.117 & 49910.82 & 0.2913 & -0.3028 & 0.1198 & -0.0321 & 0.0010 & 0.0070\
0.145 & 50661.64 & 0.2625 & -0.3677 & 0.0912 & -0.0968 & 0.0019 & 0.0080\
0.184 & 49872.86 & 0.2252 & -0.2967 & 0.0538 & -0.0259 & 0.0012 & 0.0070\
0.219 & 50636.72 & 0.2874 & -0.3558 & 0.1159 & -0.0849 & 0.0012 & 0.0080\
0.226 & 50636.80 & 0.2898 & -0.3749 & 0.1183 & -0.1040 & 0.0011 & 0.0080\
0.287 & 51025.78 & 0.2746 & -0.3784 & 0.1034 & -0.1078 & 0.0011 & 0.0220\
0.300 & 51064.76 & 0.2952 & -0.4062 & 0.1240 & -0.1356 & 0.0017 & 0.0220\
0.333 & 50922.86 & 0.3977 & -0.4008 & 0.2263 & -0.1298 & 0.0011 & 0.0060\
0.354 & 50987.82 & 0.3203 & -0.3821 & 0.1489 & -0.1112 & 0.0010 & 0.0220\
0.385 & 50690.62 & 0.3443 & -0.3991 & 0.1731 & -0.1284 & 0.0011 & 0.0080\
0.401 & 50703.77 & 0.2546 & -0.3997 & 0.0833 & -0.1289 & 0.0013 & 0.0080\
0.403 & 50716.73 & 0.2897 & -0.3675 & 0.1184 & -0.0967 & 0.0020 & 0.0080\
0.410 & 49901.66 & 0.2705 & -0.2435 & 0.0991 & 0.0274 & 0.0013 & 0.0070\
0.447 & 50639.67 & 0.2618 & -0.2654 & 0.0902 & 0.0056 & 0.0012 & 0.0080\
0.455 & 50639.77 & 0.2673 & -0.2538 & 0.0959 & 0.0171 & 0.0012 & 0.0080\
0.463 & 50639.87 & 0.2749 & -0.2538 & 0.1035 & 0.0171 & 0.0013 & 0.0080\
0.483 & 50316.65 & 0.3544 & -0.3245 & 0.1829 & -0.0535 & 0.0010 & 0.0200\
0.485 & 49863.82 & 0.2575 & -0.2304 & 0.0861 & 0.0405 & 0.0012 & 0.0070\
0.486 & 50769.56 & 0.2740 & -0.3214 & 0.1030 & -0.0509 & 0.0014 & 0.0080\
0.525 & 50640.68 & 0.3033 & -0.3901 & 0.1319 & -0.1192 & 0.0018 & 0.0080\
0.534 & 50640.79 & 0.2402 & -0.3920 & 0.0689 & -0.1213 & 0.0013 & 0.0080\
0.559 & 49864.78 & 0.5150 & -0.4246 & 0.3438 & -0.1540 & 0.0022 & 0.0070\
0.572 & 49916.70 & 0.3529 & -0.3019 & 0.1815 & -0.0309 & 0.0011 & 0.0070\
0.645 & 50797.50 & 0.3609 & -0.3924 & 0.1897 & -0.1218 & 0.0016 & 0.0080\
0.653 & 49943.63 & 0.3998 & -0.3541 & 0.2285 & -0.0833 & 0.0011 & 0.0070\
0.671 & 51056.62 & 0.3735 & -0.4160 & 0.2021 & -0.1452 & 0.0010 & 0.0220\
0.723 & 50927.90 & 0.2960 & -0.4475 & 0.1246 & -0.1766 & 0.0025 & 0.0060\
0.749 & 49970.74 & 0.3880 & -0.3424 & 0.2166 & -0.0715 & 0.0009 & 0.0070\
0.796 & 49867.84 & 0.3552 & -0.3721 & 0.1839 & -0.1013 & 0.0009 & 0.0070\
0.833 & 50644.66 & 0.2470 & -0.3595 & 0.0756 & -0.0886 & 0.0011 & 0.0080\
0.842 & 50644.77 & 0.2378 & -0.3646 & 0.0665 & -0.0937 & 0.0012 & 0.0080\
0.848 & 49790.89 & 0.2912 & -0.3398 & 0.1198 & -0.0689 & 0.0018 & 0.0070\
0.848 & 50644.86 & 0.2267 & -0.3582 & 0.0553 & -0.0873 & 0.0014 & 0.0080\
0.862 & 49842.82 & 0.3112 & -0.3377 & 0.1400 & -0.0670 & 0.0011 & 0.0070\
0.912 & 50645.68 & 0.3068 & -0.3286 & 0.1354 & -0.0577 & 0.0014 & 0.0080\
0.920 & 50645.78 & 0.2922 & -0.3419 & 0.1210 & -0.0712 & 0.0012 & 0.0080\
0.939 & 50749.54 & 0.3517 & -0.4706 & 0.1803 & -0.1997 & 0.0014 & 0.0080\
0.955 & 49908.72 & 0.5040 & -0.3810 & 0.3327 & -0.1102 & 0.0059 & 0.0070\
0.969 & 49947.72 & 0.4425 & -0.3480 & 0.2715 & -0.0772 & 0.0015 & 0.0070\
[lcccc]{} *B* &139.8 $\pm$ 3.5 &165.0 $\pm$ 0.7 &169.8 $\pm$ 1.7 &165.1 $\pm$ 0.9\
*V* &147.3 $\pm$ 3.0 &164.0 $\pm$ 0.5 &171.8 $\pm$ 1.0 &163.1 $\pm$ 0.4\
*R* &158.4 $\pm$ 0.4 &158.3 $\pm$ 0.4 &&162.2 $\pm$ 0.7\
*I* &57.3 $\pm$ 3.0 &162.7 $\pm$ 0.6 &&\
Index & 158.8 $\pm$ 0.6 &142.1 $\pm$ 1.7 &&\
H$\alpha$ & &47.9 $\pm$ 9.7 &&\
H$\beta$ & &71.1 $\pm$ 2.5 &&\
$\lambda$5876 & &63.8 $\pm$ 6.4 &&\
$\lambda$7065 & &51.0 $\pm$ 3.2 &&\
$\lambda$6678 & &138.2 $\pm$ 6.6 &&\
[lccccc]{} *B* & 0.239470 & 1 & 2.98 $\pm$ 0.01 & 0.127 $\pm$ 0.009 & 0.30 $\pm$ 0.01\
& & 2 & 1.00 $\pm$ 0.02 & 0.078 $\pm$ 0.008 & 0.37 $\pm$ 0.02\
*V* & 0.243419 & 1 & 2.98 $\pm$ 0.01 & 0.096 $\pm$ 0.007 & 0.30 $\pm$ 0.01\
& & 2 & 1.01 $\pm$ 0.03 & 0.050 $\pm$ 0.006 & 0.36 $\pm$ 0.02\
*R* & 0.241148 & 1 & 3.00 $\pm$ 0.01 & 0.107 $\pm$ 0.008 & 0.32 $\pm$ 0.01\
& & 2 & 4.02 $\pm$ 0.03 & 0.052 $\pm$ 0.009 & 0.08 $\pm$ 0.03\
*I* & 0.195021 & 1 & 3.00 $\pm$ 0.01 & 0.093 $\pm$ 0.006 & 0.30 $\pm$ 0.01\
& & 2 & 4.01 $\pm$ 0.02 & 0.050 $\pm$ 0.006 & 0.10 $\pm$ 0.02\
[lccccccccccc]{} *B* & 0.481 $\pm$ 0.004 & 0.448 & 0.543 & 0.095 &0.186 &0.045& 22 $R_\sun$& 33 $R_\sun$ &31 $R_\sun$&26 $R_\sun$\
*V* & 0.481 $\pm$ 0.004 & 0.385 & 0.554 & 0.169 &0.184 &0.080& 22 $R_\sun$ & 58 $R_\sun$ &18 $R_\sun$&9 $R_\sun$\
*R* & 0.449 $\pm$ 0.005& 0.448 & 0.524 & 0.076 &0.171 &0.080& 33 $R_\sun$& 26 $R_\sun$ &19 $R_\sun$&10 $R_\sun$\
*I* & 0.449 $\pm$ 0.004& 0.448 & 0.524 & 0.076 &0.140 &0.077& 33 $R_\sun$ & 26 $R_\sun$ &12 $R_\sun$&2 $R_\sun$\
\[Bband\]
\[Vband\]
\[Rband\]
\[Iband\]
\[allbands\]
\[HeI5876\]
\[HotSpotEffect\]
\[HotSpotSize\]
\[ieffects\]
| {
"pile_set_name": "ArXiv"
} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.