text
stringlengths
1
1.7M
meta
dict
The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete. Nothing contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein. Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author. As such, they may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or affiliates. , 2001 Carr Futures The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s) contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts to you as attachments. Crude http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude50.pdf Natural Gas http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas50.pdf July Crude http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/CLN50.pdf Brent Continuation http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/QO50.pdf Distillate and unleaded charts to follow. Nat Gas Strip Matrix http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG50.pdf Nat Gas Spread Matrix http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG50.pdf Crude and Products Spread Matrix http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL50.pdf Carr Futures 150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500 Chicago, IL 60606 USA Tel: 312-368-6149 Fax: 312-368-2281 [email protected] http://www.carrfut.com
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
_________________________________________________________________ F O O L W A T C H Monday, October 23, 2000 [email protected] _________________________________________________________________ REGISTER TO BECOME A FOOL -- GET FREE STUFF! http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165413 _________________________________________________________________ Close Change %Change NOW 50 1,826.04 -11.27 -0.61% DJIA 10,271.72 +45.13 +0.44% S&P 500 1,395.77 -1.16 -0.08% NASDAQ 3,468.69 -14.45 -0.41% (Numbers as of 5:00 p.m. ET) SPONSORED BY: BUYandHOLD Hey Fool! Want to know the SECRET to long-term investing? Compounding and dollar-cost averaging! Start investing with as little as $20! Just $2.99 per order! http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=165414 SPECIAL: LUCENT AT BAT The CEO has been ejected from the game. Time to look back at Lucent's stats for the season. http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165415 VALUE PORT: CISCO'S FORMIDABLE CHALLENGE What will Cisco's returns look like in the future? http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165416 RULE BREAKER: AOL OUT OF THE SWIRL AOL reports that the recent dot-com meltdown will actually be good for the company. http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165417 RULE MAKER: THOUGHTS ON RETIREMENT Start planning now, and the power of compound interest will be on your side. http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165418 FOOL ON THE HILL: WHY FOOLS WEAR HATS Rob Landley says our jester cap is a symbol of a most Foolish trait: the willingness to learn from your mistakes. http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165419 RETIREE PORT: WHEN NOT TO USE YOUR 401(K) PLAN Should you ever not take maximum advantage of a tax-deferred savings plan? David Braze reports his findings. http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165420 FOOL PLATE SPECIAL: NBCI EXECS EXIT With the company,s president and several top execs abruptly splitting, is peacock portal NBCi about to lay another egg? http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165421 HOT TOPICS Fools are talking about: Qualcomm vs. Nokia, self-installing Excite@Home, and more. http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165422 FOOLISH FOUR: HANDS OFF THE 401(K) Thinking of making a withdrawal from your 401(k) for some quick cash? Ouch, bad idea. http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165423 DAILY DOUBLE: ADVANTAGE EARNS AN A+ Classroom-software maker Advantage Learning Systems finds its stock value at the top of the class. http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165424 FRIBBLE: STOCK MARKET WIZARD This Fool penned a timely tune about recent stock market volatility. http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165425 BREAKFAST WITH THE FOOL: GENERAL ELECTRIC TO PURCHASE HONEYWELL General Electric announced plans to buy Honeywell for nearly $48.4 billion in stock and debt. http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165426 _________________________________________________________________ My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165427 My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165428 My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165429 Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165430 My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165431 SPONSORED BY: BUYandHOLD Hey Fool! Want to know the SECRET to long-term investing? Compounding and dollar-cost averaging! Start investing with as little as $20! Just $2.99 per order! http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=165432 WANT TO RETIRE EARLY? We'll help you set your retirement date (literally!) in our Roadmap to Retirement Online Seminar. http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165433 WIRELESS 201: NOKIA, QUALCOMM AND MORE Check out the sequel to the best-selling "Wireless 101" on Soapbox.com http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=165434 FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You can also temporarily suspend mail delivery. http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers @enron.com Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165435 _________________________________________________________________ (c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This material is for personal use only. Republication and redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool. MsgId: msg-4760-B10239749Address.msg-18:41:43(10-23-2000) X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84 X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84 Message-Recipient: [email protected]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
approved SAP Security 02/06/2001 01:28 PM Sent by: Eva Tow To: Elaine Concklin/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tracy Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON cc: Mary Botello/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: SRF for Mary Botello: Eva: Remedy 336028 Mary Botello, P00503184-GPG Corp-Job Title: Financial Analyst is requesting access to several GPG rols and it is pending your approval. Please email your response to SAP Security. If you have any questions, please Tracy Geaccone (x37372). Pending Elaine Concklin's Approval: FN IM Capital Budget Appropriation Requestor-GPG FN IM Capital Budget Approver-GPG FN IM Capital Budget Controller-GPG Pending Tracy Geaccone's Approval: FN PS Project Accountant-GPG FN PS Viewer-GPG Mary's Current Access: Global Counterparty Errors for London Std End-User profile for basis and prntg FN CO VIEWER GPG HR EMployee ESS CATS Enterprise HR FN CO ANALYST GPG FN CO CCA PLANNER GPG FN CO INTERNAL ORDER ANALYST GPG FN CO PCA PLANNER - GPG CO Master Data Creator - GPG AR MASTER RECORD CONTROL GROUP-Non-REG FN FI Consolidated Viewer-GPG Thank you, SAP Security (Eva) Mary Botello on 02/05/2001 12:48:25 PM To: SAP Security@ENRON cc: Subject: Additional Access Requested See attached form. <Embedded StdOleLink>
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
First, congratulations to all five of you and the others on your staffs who were involved for working together to get the excess line pack deal done today. As I understand it, TK was able to sell 10,000 MMBtu at the Cal Border for something like $15 thanks to your efforts. This thing went from Dave and Kent's idea to you guys' execution in about two days, even with a (slight) delay due to my panic attack on whether we can make downstream sales. Great job! Second, I think TK, Kevin, Maria and Glen and I have come up with a workable set of guidelines on when similar deals can be done in the future. The key, as I expressed in the attached email, is that the sales be driven by a legitimate operational basis. If Gas Control verifies that we have excess line pack at a location and that making the sale helps get line pack to optimal levels, such sales are appropriate. Gas Control should also verify that the operational basis for the sale can be documented if the need ever arises. Today's deal is a great example of that as we actually communicated to outside parties that we anticipated some pressure management issues. If there are ever any questions about when such deals are appropriate, or about how to document the operational basis, please give me, Susan, or Maria a call. Again, great job! DF From: Drew Fossum 11/27/2000 06:01 PM To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: TW Fuel This morning I raised a concern regarding TW's sale of excess fuel at downstream points. Here's the problem: the tariff requires shippers to tender fuel to us at their receipt points. With rare exceptions, those receipt points are not at the Cal. border. Order 636 mandates that pipelines unbundle transportation from storage. It also requires that pipelines that make gas sales do so at the furthest upstream point on their pipeline. That latter requirement means that if a pipe buys gas at point "x", it should resell the gas at point "x" and not haul the gas to point "y" and then sell it there as a delivered (i.e., bundled) product. My concern this morning was that our receipt of fuel gas in the San Juan or Permian and shipment of that gas to the Cal. border for sale arguably violates the unbundling requirement (because the Cal. border sale is a bundled combination of the sale and the transportation of the gas to the downstream location) or the "furthest upstream point" requirement or both. Susan and my recollection was that when ECS wanted to receive the Gallup fuel deliveries at a point other than Permian pool, we made them sign a transport contract to move the gas to where they wanted it. I haven't confirmed that recollection but I am recalling that we told Courtney that we couldn't just move our fuel gas around whereever we wanted it--we needed someone to pay us to transport it. Irrespective of what we did with ECS, I think the following is the correct way to look at this situation: We receive fuel at the shippers' receipt points. Once we receive it, however, it is no longer "fuel." It becomes line pack until it is burned. Line pack moves around based on a lot of reasons, including shipper imbalances, etc. It also, obviously, has to move to the compressors where it is burned as fuel. It is our job to manage line pack, and that means we buy line pack at locations where we are short, and sell it at locations where we are long. If we end up long at the Cal. border from time to time, we should sell excess line pack to get line pack back to optimal levels. I wouldn't want to get into a pattern where we are consistently buying line pack in the San Juan and Permian and selling line pack at the Cal. border, but thats not what we are talking about here. I can't think of anything in the tariff or otherwise that is inconsistent with this interpretation of our authority as operator of the pipeline. MKM--OK with you? DF
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Do you need a HUG?? :o) Crystal Hyde 05/12/2000 09:29 AM To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Transport P&L That would be the coolest thing that has happened to me all week!! not really, but I just wanted to show some enthusiam which is really hard to do on friday at 9am. Let me know when it is done so I can get me numbers from it ...okie dokie?? Thanks
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Gary Bryan, Tom, and Jim: Let's discuss at 1:30 and then I'll forward any changes to Jeff Hodge in preparation of the Alliance Draft. Jeff, I'm sending this just for fyi until after me and the guys meet. I'll get with you following our meeting. -----Original Message----- From: Redmond, Brian Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:38 AM To: Roberts, Linda Subject: please see my changes to Schedule A. I did not get to the others yet. Brian
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Gregg, 330ish looks good for both David and me. If you would like to call me, we can conference in David. Thanks, Kay
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Reservation status has changed to CONFIRMED. See attachment. ASSIGNMENT_REF = 30857 SELLER_CODE = AZPS SELLER_DUNS = 958982563 CUSTOMER_CODE = EPMI CUSTOMER_DUNS = 848921276 AFFILIATE_FLAG = 0 PATH_NAME = W/AZPS/AZPS-AZPS/FOURCORNE345 - PNPKAPS230// POINT_OF_RECEIPT = FOURCORNE345 POINT_OF_DELIVERY = PNPKAPS230 SOURCE = FOURCORNERS3 SINK = PNPK CAPACITY = 25 CAPACITY_REQUESTED = 25 SERVICE_INCREMENT = HOURLY TS_CLASS = FIRM TS_TYPE = POINT_TO_POINT TS_PERIOD = OFF_PEAK TS_WINDOW = FIXED TS_SUBCLASS = WHEEL NERC_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Nerc Priority 1 OTHER_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Default START_TIME = 06/18/2002 STOP_TIME = 06/18/2002 CEILING_PRICE = 3.13 OFFER_PRICE = 3.13 BID_PRICE = 3.13 PRICE_UNITS = $/mW PRECONFIRMED = YES ANC_SVC_LINK = N/A ANC_SVC_REQ = N/A POSTING_REF = 0 SALE_REF = REQUEST_REF = DEAL_REF = NEGOTIATED_PRICE_FLAG = STATUS = CONFIRMED STATUS_NOTIFICATION = [email protected] STATUS_COMMENTS = TIME_QUEUED = 06/17/2002 RESPONSE_TIME_LIMIT = TIME_OF_LAST_UPDATE = 06/17/2002 PRIMARY_PROVIDER_COMMENTS = SELLER_COMMENTS = CUSTOMER_COMMENTS = for info call (503)464-5070 SELLER_NAME = AZPS SELLER_PHONE = 602.250.1128 SELLER_FAX = 602.250.1155 SELLER_EMAIL = [email protected] CUSTOMER_NAME = Enron Power Marketing, Inc. CUSTOMER_PHONE = (713)853-3801 CUSTOMER_FAX = (713)646-8272 CUSTOMER_EMAIL = [email protected] REASSIGNED_REF = 0 REASSIGNED_CAPACITY = 0 REASSIGNED_START_TIME = REASSIGNED_STOP_TIME =
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
John, I think I have the wrong email address for your brother. Please email me the correct one when you get a chance. Thanks, Brian _____________________________________________________________________ IMPORTANT NOTICES: This message is intended only for the addressee. Please notify the sender by e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not copy, disclose, or distribute this message or its contents to any other person and any such actions may be unlawful. Banc of America Securities LLC("BAS") does not accept time sensitive, action-oriented messages or transaction orders, including orders to purchase or sell securities, via e-mail. BAS reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the BAS e-mail system.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Them's fightin words! Ahh my poor ankle. It's just about time for me to leave I think. To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Chain Letter-Read This. You Won't be Dissappointed. You're too chicken for that! I know you better! Chris Germany@ECT 03/24/2000 02:12 PM To: Marde L Driscoll/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Re: Chain Letter-Read This. You Won't be Dissappointed. I'm thinking about getting a "Hang Glidin" tatto. To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Chain Letter-Read This. You Won't be Dissappointed. I been hearing rumors to that effect but I didn't want to say anything.... Chris Germany@ECT 03/24/2000 01:23 PM To: Marde L Driscoll/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Re: Chain Letter-Read This. You Won't be Dissappointed. Yep. I'm a wild man now. To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Chain Letter-Read This. You Won't be Dissappointed. Do you really want to take that chance to fine out?!!!!! Chris Germany@ECT 03/24/2000 12:16 PM To: Marde L Driscoll/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Re: Chain Letter-Read This. You Won't be Dissappointed. What do I get if I break the chain?
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
-----Original Message----- From: Miller, Tim [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:28 AM To: Paul Lucci (E-mail) Subject: Wellhead RFP Paul, I think I did everything Friday but send the RFP to you! Trying again.......... <<GISB Base Contract Wellhead RFP 2001.ZIP>> <<GISB Special Provisions_BPE Wellhead RFP 2001.doc>> <<GISB_all Wellhead RFP 2001.ZIP>> <<BP Wellhead RFP Letter 2001.doc>> Tim Timothy R. Miller Asset Manager BP Energy Company Voice: 281-366-4965 Fax: 281-366-4932 Mobile: 281-380-0410
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
My litigation description looks fine.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
ThinkBank went live with a bang last Friday! The Idea Vault already has more than 20 innovative entries, and the eThink team has been busy routing these ideas to the right people. There are ideas about everything from new trading opportunities to hot air balloons. Visit the ThinkBank today. Got an idea? Make a deposit. Need some help? Make a withdrawal. eMeet has a brand-new look. Have you seen it yet? We took your feedback -- thanks for posting it right there in eMeet -- and created a more dynamic and informative site for you. Check it out. Go to eMeet now! Don't miss Cindy Olson's eSpeak this Thursday, November 3 at 10:00 am Houston time. Cindy, executive vice president of Human Resources & Community Affairs will be answering your questions about the new Enron employee stock option program. And, if you can't make the live event (all together now), be sure to pre-submit your question(s) on the eSpeak site! You know you have the stuff to increase Enron's competitive advantage. Put it in the Edge today.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
i think so, maybe tomorrow -----Original Message----- From: Hillman, Liz Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:33 AM To: Parks, Joe Subject: RE: Welcome!!!! Are you starting this week?? -----Original Message----- From: Parks, Joe Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:31 AM To: Hillman, Liz Subject: RE: Welcome!!!! i should be over today at some point in time. -----Original Message----- From: Hillman, Liz Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:14 AM To: Parks, Joe Subject: Welcome!!!! Can't wait for you to get over here!
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Ha! I appreciate the complement but I like my current job just fine--all I have to do is crap on a contract now and then and argue with Mary Kay all day long. Piece of cake! DF Steven Harris 06/19/2000 10:53 AM To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Pueblo Excellent questions! Are you sure you don't want a job in the Commercial Group? You talent as a deal maker is definitely underutilized. From: Drew Fossum 06/19/2000 10:27 AM To: Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: William Gang/HOU/EES@EES@ECT, John M Rose/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT, Bill Votaw@ECT, Jerry D Martin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT, Arnold L Eisenstein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: Pueblo Thanks for the extremely helpful analysis Steve and John. I'm getting a pretty clear sense that this project isn't going anywhere as it is currently configured. Just to satisfy myself, though, let me throw out a couple of observations for the group to react to, along the lines of Steve's "However" section of his memo: 1. Running this thing as a baseload unit won't work. The fuel cost is a killer. However, I keep thinking about the $200/mwh 4 Corners spot price someone mentioned on the phone. Is there enough volatility at 4 Corners to support a peaking merchant plant? How often are those types of opportunities available, and could a power plant in Alb. capture that upside by transporting power to 4 Corners over PNMs system? 2. We have been assuming that the power plant should be a baseload plant. Someone on the phone last week had some numbers indicating that the DOE/DOD electric load at Kirtland had a fairly high load factor. I think we have all assumed further that the plant should run at a high load factor to sell surplus power into the grid (either at 4 Corners or, after N.M. elec. restructuring, into the Alb. area). I just found the numbers I was remembering on the conf. call--1998 peak load was 63.6 mw, and total annual 1998 consumption was 334.5 million Kwh. By my lawyer-math, that is about a 60% load factor for DOE. If the DOE load is only 60% L.F., and the plant only generates surplus power when it can capture profit opportunities that arise when the market clearing price at 4 Corners or in Albuquerque exceeds some benchmark rate ($.05/Kwh? $.10/Kwh? higher?) the plant might run at a 30-40% load factor on an annual basis. The question is can we reduce the capital cost significantly by building a peaker instead of a baseload unit? 3. Could we get debt financing for a 140 mw plant that had a baseload demand charge contract for only 65 mw (i.e., DOE) but sold the rest of its output into the grid only when profit opportunities arose? 4. If the answer to 3. is no, would ENA backstop the debt financing by signing a demand charge contract for all surplus power over and above what the government needs? At what price? Based on its knowledge of volatility and profit opportunities currently available at 4 Corners, and future profit opportunities that will be available in Albuq. is that just a dumb bet, or would ENA get interested if someone else (i.e., DOE) split the risk and reward? John, how much of the information in your analysis could be sanitized in a way that we could provide it to Dennis Langley? If we pull the plug on the project, I'd like to be in a position that we could let him in on some of our information on why the turbines we would use can't provide acceptable economics. I don't expect that we'd want to disclose the swap value analysis in Steve's memo, however. Thanks again, and I'd appreciate anyone's reaction to the above questions. DF Stephen Thome@ECT 06/16/2000 06:12 PM To: William Gang/HOU/EES@EES cc: John M Rose/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bill Votaw@ECT, Jerry D Martin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Arnold L Eisenstein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven Harris@ENRON, Drew Fossum@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg@ENRON Subject: Re: Pueblo John's proposed plant costs are consistent with what we have seen for our ongoing LM6000 development. I have priced 130 MW at Four Corners assuming Permian gas plus 50 cents for transport. This also assumes $4.70 per MWh for O&M and an 8000 heat rate. For an hourly 7x24 product, the intrinsic value of the gas-power swap is $52.5 million on a 20 year deal, well below the $108 million estimate of constructing the facility. A ten year swap is worth only $42 million (NPV = -66 m ). That implies a market mid-price of $34 per MWh levelized over the period. Using the ENA Power and Gas structuring model and curves, we can determine the following: 1. New build gas turbines cannot compete against the New Mexico market on price. 2. LM6000 CCGT efficiency gain does not pay for HRSG and ST over a ten year period. However: 1. Transmission constraints could create market value in Albuquerque that does not exist at Four Corners. 2. ENA's power prices typically undersell the market. 3. Commodity pricing does not accurately value capacity or reliability in constrained markets. If Enron wants to do a deal in Albuquerque, we should be selling capacity and reliability. Given the number of power- critical industries in the area, we could look at siting several remote units at different locations in the city. Numerous chip manufacturing facilities and the Kirtland base could support several LM6000's for power reliability that is specific to their installations. I might also suggest that peaking units would have advantages over CCGT units. Existing generation already provides ample baseload supply, however, the production of peak and intermediate energy is not necessarily well suited to existing units. LM6000's have exceptionally good ramp rates that provide real value to a utility customer. Not only can the HRSG/ST hinder the flexibility of the units, it can add substantial capital and operating expense with little real market benefit. We should also explore the ability to schedule load. If the DOE wants to peak for a test, would it be willing or able to schedule a test for the off-peak hours? Under those circumstances, we might be able to cut them a break on power and provide reliability of supply. Steve Thome 503-464-3708 John M Rose@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 06/15/2000 06:53 PM To: Bill Gang@EES cc: , Stephen Thome@ECT Subject: Pueblo Bill, Yesterday, we decided to look at two options for Pueblo; a 60 MW case and a 140 MW case. In order to match these outputs as closely as possible with available equipment, I made the following selections: Case 1 Equipment 3 X GE LM 2500 Gas Turbine Generators with Heat Recovery and 1 X 22 MW Steam Turbine Generator Output at 95 deg F & 5000 ft 67 MW Output at avg. conditions (60 deg F) 73.4 MW Heat Rate at avg. conditions 8170 Btu/kWh (HHV) Case 2 Equipment 3 X GE LM 6000 Gas Turbine Generators with Heat Recovery and 1 X 44 MW Steam Turbine Generator Output at 95 deg F & 5000 ft 130 MW Output at avg. conditions (60 deg F) 143.7 MW Heat Rate at avg. conditions 7900 Btu/kWh (HHV) There is a wide fluctuation in ambient temperature in Albuquerque and I sized the blocks based on 95 deg F but used the annual average output at 60 deg F for estimating power sales. I have attached files that show the build-up of the estimated EPC price for the plants. The required power prices are projected in a simple-minded economics file attached. The projections are based on: 70% debt financing at 10% rate. 10-year project and debt life. 8500 hours per year at average output (97% capacity factor). Gas at $4.40/MMBtu. The results turn out pretty much as anticipated. Even with the larger plant, we'd have to sell the power for over 6c/kWh.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Sorry about the Greek in the first paragraph of my last E-mail. I still can't figure out how I did that. All I said was, as you know, CMUA filed a complaint with FERC asking for cost-based rates and introducing an outline of an answer to the legal issues. Under the FERC rules, we are required to file an answer to the complaint. I have also asked Seabron for an estimate for answering the economics assertions raised in CMUA and PG&E's filings. ---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000 11:18 AM --------------------------- Mary Hain 10/18/2000 10:37 AM To: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, [email protected], Richard Sanders, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona Petrochko, [email protected], Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Christi Nicolay, [email protected] Subject: Proposed Answer of CMUA's Complaint As you have already heard, California Municipal Utilities Association filed a complaint with FERC asking for cost based rates. The following is a brief outline of an EPMI/EES answer to the complaint. The answer is due Friday. Please send me any comments ASAP. ? The complaint should be rejected because it wrongly assumes that the Commission has no option to ensure just and reasonable rates but to require cost based rates because there is no low cost solution to the problems currently faced by the California markets. We should attach our white paper to our protest and state that the paper explains how these problems could be solved at little or no cost to the customers. ? I list here, for your information, the reasons CMUA claims that markets are not competitive (these reasons will not be re-listed in the pleading). ? 2000 prices greatly exceeded 1999 prices without regard to load. ? zonal constrained prices, even in the off-peak hours, do not reflect competitive outcomes for low load conditions. ? even small players can be price setters ? The changes required are additional generation, transmission, and demand response and will cost tens of millions of dollars and take lengthy periods of time to implement. ? There is no evidence that markets will ensure just and reasonable rates in the near future. ? CMUA asserts that with the advent of electric restructuring, the Commission has increasingly allowed energy and ancillary services to be sold at market-based rates. However, CMUA is wrong in the context of the West where there has been market-based trading of electricity before electric restructuring, since the FERC approved the Western Systems Power Pool,s contract in 1991. The Commission,s rules didn,t create the wholesale market in the past, the market did and it was running fine until it was messed up by certain market rules were imposed that are enumerated in our paper. The problem is not the market-based rates. The problem is the market rules. ? CMUA,s motion does not address how market-based rates would be calculated for marketers that do not sell power from their own resources, let alone reflect the trading of basis points. Almost all of the power EPMI sells is power it has bought from some other marketer or generator. Many of EPMI,s deals are done through brokers such that EPMI does not find out the identity of the seller until after a deal has been struck. Accordingly, EPMI gets no information about the cost of the underlying generation. ? If FERC doesn,t try to fix the market but simply takes away our market-based rates, since there,s is no basis for us to set cost based rates, we would go out of business. Besides there,s no reason to take away our market-based rates because we are not exercising market power. So if FERC could fix the problem with a less onerous solution (as we,ve proposed in our white paper), requiring cost-based rates would constitute a regulatory taking of our business and we would have to be compensated using the constitutional standard. CMUA does not provide any expert testimony to support its position. Rather, its evidence is &drawn from materials prepared and testimony delivered by the California ISO and other public sources.8 Beyond the difficult evidentiary issue posed by the fact that CMUA cannot swear to the veracity of information produced by third parties, EPMI would have no opportunity to conduct discovery or cross-examine of such &witnesses.8
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Hi Sabrina, I'm working on the suject DMS. I'm going to need detailed settlement data from the counterparty. Thanks, Lisa
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Sandy, we are still finalizing the contract and expected volumes with Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corporation for the two Terrebonne Parish deals referenced above, but we expect to enter into a long term deal prior to the end of December. Would you please re-confirm that the notional pricing set forth in your 11/13/2000 memo for the two Cabot Terrebonne Parish deals is still valid for 5 years firm out of January 2001 for 80% of the volumes cited in my original request . Thanks. George x3-6992 ---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000 07:26 AM --------------------------- Enron North America Corp. From: Sandy Olitsky 11/13/2000 02:11 PM To: George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert Crockett/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Cabot Quotes George: We got new quotes from the desk regarding Cabot. Attached is the spreadsheet with the new numbers. Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks. Sandy
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Ken -- Best wishes on your new role. It has been a pleasure interacting with you in the past, and I hope our paths cross many times in the future. Best regards. -- Rex ----- Forwarded by Rex Shelby/Enron Communications on 12/13/00 08:05 AM ----- Ken Lay@ENRON Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON 12/13/00 06:01 AM To: All Enron Worldwide cc: Subject: Succession Plan It is my great pleasure to announce that the Board has accepted my recommendation to appoint Jeff Skilling as chief executive officer, effective at the time of their next board meeting on February 12, 2001. Jeff will also retain his duties as president and chief operating officer. I will continue as chairman of the Board and will remain at Enron, working with Jeff on the strategic direction of the company and our day-to-day global operations. Jeff will assume the role at a time when the company is hitting on all cylinders and is positioned for phenomenal growth. He is clearly ready for the job, and after 15 years as CEO of this great company, I,m ready for a somewhat different role. Our succession plan has been clear for some time. This has afforded Jeff and me the freedom to combine our strengths toward building a company that continues to exceed everyone,s expectations, including our own. We look forward to furthering that relationship as Jeff expands his role. There are no plans for any other changes in our management team nor broad shifts in strategy and direction. Please join me in congratulating Jeff. I look forward to a great 2001.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Please note Credit has no EOL responses to report today. Regards Molly
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 10:24 AM To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: SCE Advice 1534-E-A On April 20, 2001, SCE filed Advice 1534-E-A with the Commission. Title: Establishment of Four New Balancing Accounts and other Tariff Revisions - Supplemental Filing Purpose: This advice filing establishes four separate balancing accounts: 1) the SCE Utility Retained Generation Balancing Account; 2) the SCE Contracts Balancing Account; 3) the Procurement Costs Balancing Account; and 4) the Ancillary Services Balancing Account. In addition, this filing dedicates a portion of SCE's residually determined generation rate and Commission-approved surcharges between the four balancing accounts based on estimated costs for a twelve-month period and establishes the Generation Rate Trigger Mechanism. Furthermore, in conjunction with the implementation of the four new balancing accounts and the Trigger Mechanism, this filing 1) modifies the Transition Revenue Account; 2) establishes the Net Undercollected Amount Account; (3) eliminates the Transition Cost Balancing Account; 4) eliminates the Generation Memorandum Accounts 2 ; and 5) eliminates the Emergency Procurement Surcharge Balancing Account. To view other SCE advice letters, please click on the URL address below and select the Regulatory Info Center/Advice Letters. http://www.sce.com/005_regul_info/005b_advice_letters_tariffs.shtml. This notice is being sent to all interested parties of R.00-11-038 and the GO 96-A Service List. (See attached file: 1534-E-A (Part 1 of 1).pdf) Emelyn Lawler RP&A, Advice Letters Email:? [email protected] Phone: ?(626) 302-3985 Fax:? (626) 302-4829 7:00 a.m. ? 3: 45 p.m. - 1534-E-A (Part 1 of 1).pdf
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Count on me for interviews at OU on Monday, October 30. If possible, I would love to fly up on Monday morning, preserving my Sunday night at home. The first flight from IAH to OKC arrives in OKC at 8:10 am. I could easily be in Norman for a 9:00 am interview. I can also stay for interviews on October 31, with a target of catching a flight from OKC at 1:35 pm back to IAH (the next flight after that for leaves OKC at 4:36 and arrives at IAH at 5:56, putting me at my house around 7:00 - too late for the start of trick or treating with a 2 year old). I plan to have dinner on Monday night with Chris Hoyle, the student that Jody Crook believes is the top graduate from the business school this year. I would like to get to know him since I did not interview him when I was at OU this last time. I have also forwarded your message on OU to Cary Carrabine in the Chicago office. I will let you know what I hear back from him. Consider Shona Wilson and Steve Venturatos as interviewers again if you are short on 10/30 & 31. Finally, I have noted November 10 on my calendar for the management overview. Keep me posted on details. --Sally Enron North America Corp. From: Lexi Elliott @ ENRON 10/16/2000 06:33 PM To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Coats/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tamara Hopkins/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick Wade/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark McConnell/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Justin O'Malley/HOU/EES@EES, Jody Crook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patrick Maloy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rafael Avila/HOU/EES@EES, Nate Blackburn/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Miertschin/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: OU Update Dear OU Team: I wanted to send a quick update regarding the rest of the fall recruiting season: According to your recruiting guide, we are scheduled to host a Corporate View on October 19 and 20. This has been changed to November 10. This event will now be co-sponsored (in Houston) with Arthur Andersen and will also involve students from the Fellows group at Texas A&M. We were given this opportunity through Tim Rasnic (our JC Penney Leadership contact at OU) and Dr. Tim Peterson (the contact for our Texas A&M recruiter). Details will be sent to the group as Tim Rasnic finalizes the logistical details between the 2 groups. Also, we will be conducting Intern Interviews October 30 and 31. I realize this falls at a time when many of you are interested in being with your families (as would I), so please keep in mind that the greater number of interviewers we have for this event, the sooner we can all get back home to TRICK-OR-TREAT!!! We will sort through the candidate resumes once I receive them from Career Services. Please let me know as soon as possible if you will be able to help with interviews on day 1 (October 30). Just to update you on last week's interviews: We will be inviting 9 candidates to Super Saturday on November 4. I will send their names and contact information to you after each has been notified. Thanks to each of you for making this season such a success! I appreciate the time and help you have all provided! thanks! lexi 3-4585
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Update: The meeting will be in 49C1, today at 4:00pm. Sorry for the late notice! ---------------------- Forwarded by Regan M Smith/HOU/ECT on 05/11/2000 12:50 PM --------------------------- Regan M Smith 05/10/2000 11:54 AM To: Jeff Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kenneth M Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Schomer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Philip R Glass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Glenn Kobes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Wayne Andrews/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pamela Lebrane/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan S Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Bob Klein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Williamson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott F Lytle/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Update - SAP/ Unify - Major open issues & late requirements impacting overall schedules The attached spreadsheet is updated from Tuesday's meeting with the action item in blue. Major open issues & late requirements impacting overall schedule Unify, SAP, or business change requirements There will be a follow-up meeting tomorrow, Thursday, 4:00pm, EB2626, unless the room needs to change. Changes, updates, please email myself, Chris, or Jeff Johnson. Regan Smith x39291
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Here is my best attempt at month-to-date volumes, holler if you strongly disagree!
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Is this the weekly fundamentals report produced by Tim Heizenrader's group? In Houston, we have been receiving the report on Tuesday afternoon via email before the fundamentals meeting in Portland. How can distribution through or administrative assistants be more efficient? The administrative assistant for the West gas desk is Ina Rangel. Her location is EB3210. Phillip Allen 713-853-7041 -----Original Message----- From: Bruce, James Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:34 PM To: Allen, Phillip K.; Alonso, Tom; Alport, Kysa; Badeer, Robert; Belden, Tim; Brown, Kortney; Bruce, James; Bryson, Jesse; Buerkle, Jim; Cadena, Angela; Calger, Christopher F.; Chang, Fran; Chen, Andy; Choi, Paul; Clark, Ed; Comnes, Alan; Conwell, Wendy; Dalia, Minal; Davidson, Debra; Donovan, Terry W.; Driscoll, Michael M.; Dunton, Heather; Dyer, Laird; Eriksson, Fredrik; Etringer, Michael; Fillinger, Mark; Foster, Chris H.; Frost, David; Fuller, Dave; Gilbert, Jim; Gomez, Julie A.; Gray, Stan; Grigsby, Mike; Guillaume, David; Guzman, Mark; Hammond, Don; Holst, Keith; Kaufman, Paul; Lackey, Chris; Law, Samantha; Mainzer, Elliot; Malowney, John; Mays, Wayne; Mcdonald, Michael; Mckay, Jonathan; Miller, Stephanie; Motley, Matt; Mullen, Mark; Mumm, Chris; Nelson, Kourtney; Ngo, Tracy; Oh, Jeffrey; Page, Jonalan; Parquet, David; Perry, Todd; Polsky, Phil; Presto, Darin; Radous, Paul; Rance, Susan; Rawson, Lester; Richter, Jeff; Rosman, Stewart; Sacks, Edward; Salisbury, Holden; Sarnowski, Julie; Savage, Gordon; Scholtes, Diana; Semperger, Cara; Shields, Jeff; Slaughter, Jeff G.; Smith, Sarabeth; Soderquist, Larry; Surowiec, Glenn; Swain, Steve; Swerzbin, Mike; Symes, Kate; Thomas, Jake; Thome, Stephen; Thome, Stephen; Thompson, Virginia; Van Gelder, John; Ward, Kim S (Houston); Wente, Laura; Williams III, Bill; Williams, Bill; Williams, Jason R (Credit); Zufferli, John Subject: Distribution of report The method for distribution of the weekly reports has changed. Hard copies will now be distributed through your administrative assistant. To receive a paper copy of the report, please send me an e-mail request including you location and admin. The information in these reports is for internal use only and should not be the basis for investment decisions. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments, James Bruce Enron North America (503) 464-8122 West Power Desk (503) 860-8612 (c) 121 SW Salmon, 3WTC0306 (503) 464-3740 (fax) Portland, OR 97204 [email protected]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Please plan to meet in the 4th Floor Conference Room at 9:00 AM tomorrow morning, Wednesday, 3/27/02, to discuss our new time keeping process. You will receive an invite thru Outlook. If you have any questions, let me know. Julie K x7404
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Colleagues: EES positions as of end of April 2001 are now available at the following level of details: The position (long, short, and net) in electric utility "x" The position (long, short, and net) per customer in the electric utility "x". The position (long, short, and net) per rate schedule/customer class in electric utility "x". Aggregates of the above per State, NERC Region, and Customer. If you need any position for a specific utility in your service territory, please contact Miyung Buster ((713-853-4329) by email with cc to: Stella Chan, and/or Amr Ibrahim and we shall attempt to provide the data in the shortest possible time (currently aiming at within the same business day). Additional names for contact will be added very soon, hopefully, to shorten the reply time and increase data reliability. Best regards AI 713-853-3037
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
User ID: enronuslw PW: bnaweb22 -----Original Message----- From: "BNA Highlights" <[email protected]>@ENRON Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:41 PM To: BNA Highlights Subject: Nov. 20 -- U.S. Law Week's Case Alert ______________________________ THE U.S. LAW WEEK'S CASE ALERT Highlights & Table of Contents November 20, 2001 ______________________________ ISSN 1522-4317 Registered Web subscribers can access the full text of these articles by using the URL link supplied. Information about becoming a subscriber or signing up for a FREE Web trial is available at http://web.bna.com or call BNA Customer Relations at 1-800-372-1033, Mon. - Fri. 8:30 am - 7:00 pm (ET). __________ HIGHLIGHTS __________ NINTH CIRCUIT USES EIGHTH AMENDMENT PROPORTIONALITY TEST TO VOID NONCAPITAL SENTENCE IMPOSED UNDER CALIFORNIA'S THREE STRIKES LAW Prison terms, imposed under California's "Three Strikes" law, that will ensure at least 50 years of incarceration for a nonviolent recidivist convicted of petty theft violate the Eighth Amendment, the Ninth Circuit declares. The court finds the sentence grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the defendant's property crimes and to comparable sentences in other jurisdictions. The Three Strikes law imposes a minimum 25-year sentence without parole for any third felony offense by a defendant with at least two prior convictions for "serious" or "violent" felonies. The court cites several problems with the statute, including that the triggering felony need not be serious or violent, the prior strikes need not be violent offenses, and there is no time period after which prior convictions will no longer be counted as strikes. . . . Page 1294 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4y2a9x1_ FRAUD ON COURT, AS OPPOSED TO FRAUD ON PTO, MAY NOT SERVE AS GROUND FOR HOLDING PATENT UNENFORCEABLE, FEDERAL CIRCUIT SAYS Litigation misconduct by a patentee may be the basis for dismissing a particular patent infringement suit but not for finding the patent unenforceable, the Federal Circuit holds. "Litigation misconduct, while serving as a basis to dismiss the wrongful litigant, does not infect, or even affect, the original grant of the property right," the court reasons. The court distinguishes fraud on the court from inequitable conduct before the Patent and Trademark Office in obtaining the patent, which taints the patent itself and renders it unenforceable by any party. The court disavows broad dicta in a 1990 decision indicating that patents may be held "unenforceable due to unclean hands." . . . Page 1298 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x9z9j0_ PUNITIVE DAMAGES MEGA-AWARD IN EXXON VALDEZ CASE REVERSED BY NINTH CIRCUIT AS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY EXCESSIVE The $5 billion punitive damages award to commercial fishermen injured by the "Exxon Valdez" oil spill is unconstitutionally excessive, the Ninth Circuit rules. The award is disproportionate to the $287 million compensatory damages incurred by the plaintiffs, to potential criminal and civil penalties, and to the $125 million restitution and penalty settlement with federal and state authorities, the court finds. The unprecedented 1995 award was entered before the U.S. Supreme Court spelled out the due process constraints on the magnitude of punitive damages in "BMW v. Gore". Applying the "Gore" standards, the Ninth Circuit concludes that the district court did not properly take into account the purely economic nature of the harm incurred by the plaintiffs, the unintentional character of the accident, or the mitigating actions undertaken by Exxon. . . . Page 1301 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x8q1y4_ _____________ IN THIS ISSUE _____________ A complete topical index of Case Alert. ATTORNEYS: A lawyer sued for negligently supervising a lawyer-employee who bilked clients is not protected by state statutes shielding lawyers from liability to those not in privity of contract with them, the Arkansas Supreme Court holds. . . . Page 1291 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4y2t4m1_ BANKING: A National Credit Union Administration rule allowing family members of a group member to join multiple common bond credit unions without counting against the statutory 3,000-member limit for such credit unions is consistent with the recent changes to the Federal Credit Union Act, the D.C. Circuit holds. . . . Page 1292 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4y0y8g7_ BANKRUPTCY: A bankruptcy debtor whose interest in his ex-spouse's individual retirement account arose through a marriage dissolution decree, not from his own employment, cannot make use of Minnesota's exemption for IRA funds, the Eighth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel decides. . . . Page 1292 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x7f2y9_ CRIMINAL LAW: A Virginia statute that bars the burning of a cross with the intent of intimidating any person or group selectively prohibits speech on the basis of content and is overbroad in violation of the First Amendment, the Virginia Supreme Court declares. . . . Page 1293 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4y2a9u8_ CRIMINAL LAW: The imposition of two consecutive 25-years-to-life sentences under California's "Three Strikes" law upon a nonviolent recidivist convicted of petty theft violates the Eighth Amendment's protection against disproportionate sentences, the Ninth Circuit determines. . . . Page 1294 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4y2a9x1_ ENVIRONMENT: CERCLA generally does not preempt a local ordinance authorizing a California city to investigate and remediate hazardous waste contamination of its soil and ground water, the Ninth Circuit finds. . . . Page 1295 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x3w7b1_ FAMILY LAW: A parent's use of deception to establish "home state" jurisdiction in a child custody dispute is "reprehensible conduct" for which the court may decline jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals holds in a case of first impression. . . . Page 1296 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x8n7r5_ MASS MEDIA: Arizona restrictions on the sale of material "harmful to minors" from vending machines withstand First Amendment strict scrutiny, the Arizona Court of Appeals rules. . . . Page 1297 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x6v0b7_ PATENTS: A federal court exceeded its authority in ruling a patent unenforceable due to the patentee's litigation misconduct, the Federal Circuit concludes. . . . Page 1298 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x9z9j0_ PUBLIC CONTRACTS: An executive order restricting project labor agreements on federal or federally assisted construction projects is not supported by constitutional or statutory authority and is preempted by the National Labor Relations Act, a federal court in the District of Columbia holds, permanently enjoining enforcement of the order. . . . Page 1299 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x8p2g3_ TAXATION: The Federal Circuit upholds 1993 federal estate tax legislation that retroactively increased the estate tax rate on taxable estates over $3 million from 50 to 55 percent. . . . Page 1300 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x6e2c3_ TORTS: The Ninth Circuit reverses the $5 billion punitive damages award levied in the "Exxon Valdez" oil spill tort suit as excessive in violation of due process. . . . Page 1301 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x8q1y4_ TRADE REGULATION: A Vermont statute that requires labeling of mercury-containing consumer products does not likely violate the commerce clause or the First Amendment as applied to light bulbs, the Second Circuit decides. . . . Page 1302 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4y1f5j9_ CASES IN BRIEF : . . . Page 1303 ______________ TABLE OF CASES ______________ American Bankers Association v. National Credit Union Administration (D.C. Cir.) . . . Page 1292 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4y0y8g7_ Anderson v. Seaver (In re Anderson) (B.A.P. 8th Cir.) . . . Page 1292 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x7f2y9_ Andrade v. Attorney General of California (9th Cir.) . . . Page 1294 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4y2a9x1_ Aptix Corp. v. Quickturn Design Systems Inc. (Fed. Cir.) . . . Page 1298 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x9z9j0_ Baker v. Hazelwood (In re Exxon Valdez) (9th Cir.) . . . Page 1301 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x8q1y4_ BankAmerica Corp. Securities Litigation, In re (8th Cir.) . . . Page 1303 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x7k4j8_ Black v. Commonwealth (Va.) . . . Page 1293 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4y2a9u8_ Building and Construction Trades Department, AFL-CIO v. Allbaugh (D.D.C.) . . . Page 1299 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x8p2g3_ Chavez v. Whirlpool Corp. (Cal. Ct. App.) . . . Page 1303 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x7y6p8_ Doe v. Department of Public Safety (2d Cir.) . . . Page 1303 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4y1k0y4_ Ferrell v. Harvard Industries Inc. (E.D. Pa.) . . . Page 1304 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4y2e9z1_ Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Lodi, Calif. (9th Cir.) . . . Page 1295 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x3w7b1_ Gruber v. Gruber (Md. Ct. Spec. App.) . . . Page 1296 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x8n7r5_ Madden v. Aldrich (Ark.) . . . Page 1291 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4y2t4m1_ Mattice v. Memorial Hospital of South Bend (N.D. Ind.) . . . Page 1304 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x7y4d9_ National Electrical Manufacturers Association v. Sorrell (2d Cir.) . . . Page 1302 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4y1f5j9_ NationsBank of Texas NA v. United States (Fed. Cir.) . . . Page 1300 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x6e2c3_ Schiff v. Prados (Calif. Ct. App.) . . . Page 1304 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4y2e9z4_ Special Devices Inc. v. OEA Inc. (Fed. Cir.) . . . Page 1304 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x7k3n2_ State v. Evenson (Ariz. Ct. App.) . . . Page 1297 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x6v0b7_ United States v. DeLuca (10th Cir.) . . . Page 1304 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x8r0n1_ United States v. Scott (1st Cir.) . . . Page 1304 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x8r0m8_ United States v. Taylor (D. Minn.) . . . Page 1304 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4y1m3j4_ Wright v. Hanna Steel Corp. (11th Cir.) . . . Page 1304 http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4x7k4k1_ ___________________________________________________________ The U.S. Law Week (ISSN 1522-4317) BNA's Highlights are published weekly by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc., 1231 25th St., N.W., Washington, DC 20037. For Customer Service including subscriptions and address changes, call 1-800-372-1033. For retransmission of the Highlights, more information or to order full text of summarized stories, call BNA PLUS at 1-800-452-7773 (202-452-4323 in DC), FAX # 202-822-8092, Internet:[email protected]. Copyright (c) 2001 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. Washington, D.C. 20037. Use of this service is subject to the terms and conditions of the license agreement with BNA. Unauthorized access or distribution is prohibited.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Attached is the April 2001 Assignment, Termination & Expiration Report for Houston Pipe Line's contracts. (FYI - It contains all of the entries made by our group since the report was last done on 3/8/01, regardless of the effective date.) If you do not need to receive this report or if you know of someone else that should receive it, please let me know by e-mail or phone (x-36982) so that I can either remove your name from or add their name to the distribution list.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I knew it was Canadian and started with a "T". Am I good or what!?! When you get to be my age you'll have no memory left. Sure wish you were down here enjoying these 109+ degree days with us. It'll make you appreciate Calgary in Winter. Peter Keohane 09/06/2000 01:06 PM To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Talisman Milnthorp is following up with McKay who is back tomorrow. PS TransAlta Energy Marketing.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Hey, If you want to email me back before Monday, you can email me at [email protected] That way I can read your reaction even though I won't be at work. Talk to you soon, Sue
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I think that we should record one of our "sessions" at the deer lease and send it in to some radio station?it would surely be the talk of the Internet world. I.E.- "Do YOU want to be in?" "I think Chad is already IN?" "look at the Batwings on THAT?" -----Original Message----- From: Fenner, Chet [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:53 PM To: 'chad knipe'; Brad Corrier; Joe Parks; EriK Wollam; Brian Constantine; Fenner, Chet Subject: RE: Radio Prank It's a beautiful world out there. -----Original Message----- From: chad knipe [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 7:52 PM To: Brad Corrier; Joe Parks; EriK Wollam; Brian Constantine; Chet Fenner Subject: Fw: Radio Prank careful what you say........ ----- Original Message ----- From: Andy Mullally Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:11 PM To: Mike Snell (E-mail); Chuck & Lisa Hutchinson (E-mail); David Oubrea (E-mail); Les Parker (E-mail); Mike Scott (E-mail); The Harper's (E-mail); The Boeker's (E-mail); The Knipe's (E-mail 2) Subject: Radio Prank Be sure and listen to the last sentence. There are a few strong words that kids don't need to hear. Regards, Andy Andy Mullally 281-225-8013
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I thought these were taken care of long ago. I think they relate to Neal's work for EES on the chilled water project for Enron Field. Let me know. ---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 12/06/99 09:58 AM --------------------------- [email protected] on 12/06/99 09:52:44 AM To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: old bills I still have all those old "counseling" invoices on our "accounts receivable watchlist." They total $9,500 and some are more than a year old. Any chance of getting them paid so we can be clean at the end of the year?
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Digital Frontiers Calif. Says Digitally Signed Broker Contracts Are Valid By ROSS SNEL 08/03/1999 American Banker Page 12 Copyright (c) 1999 American Banker, Inc. All Rights Reserved. A new California law opens the door for brokerages to conduct most, if not all, of their business in cyberspace. The legislation, which applies only to broker-dealers, validates brokerage contracts that are digitally signed. Though Internet brokerages routinely accept trading orders on-line, most require customers to enroll and order account transfers by sending in paper documents. The law makes such paperwork no longer necessary. Digital signatures-a derivative of data encryption technology that binds customer identities to documents-are seen as a way to "legalize" on-line exchanges of information. The California legislation, which California Governor Gray Davis signed into law last week, "gives people some certainty that these contracts are enforceable," said Thomas J. Smedinghoff, a partner in the Chicago law firm McBride Baker & Coles and a leading authority on digital signatures. He added, however, that the law's specific definition of a digital signature could limit the flexibility of its application as the technology evolves. Certainty about the validity of digital credentials is especially important to securities brokers, because securities transactions are typically much bigger than merchandise transactions on the Internet, said Christopher Musto, a senior analyst at Gomez Advisors Inc. in Concord, Mass. E-Trade Group Inc., the Menlo Park, Calif. on-line broker, pushed for the California bill, bringing the issue to the attention of state Sen. John Vasconcellos, a Democrat from San Jose. Sen. Vasconcellos introduced the proposal in February, and it passed the Senate July 15. San Francisco-based Charles Schwab Corp., the leading Internet brokerage, also offered input on the law's definition of a digital signature, according to Sen. Vasconcellos' chief of staff, Rand Martin. Schwab has focused its legislative efforts more on the federal level, however, a spokesman for the company said. "This action is a step in the right direction," the spokesman said. "But the real objective would be to get national legislation that creates uniformity regarding the use of digital signatures." E-Trade said in a news release that the new law would apply to its transactions with customers in all 50 states, but the Schwab spokesman said its applicability beyond California is "murky." E-Trade did not respond to calls seeking elaboration on how it sees the law applying across the country. Mr. Smedinghoff, chairman of the American Bar Association's electronic commerce division, said the only way the law would have broader applicability is if a broker stipulated that a contract was governed by the laws of California. Legislation on digital signatures varies from state to state. For example, Connecticut law covers only medical records at hospitals, while Illinois makes electronic signatures applicable to all communications. In 1995 California became one of the early adopters of digital signature legislation, but that legislation was limited to communication with government agencies. Utah is often cited as the country's digital signature pacesetter, with a comprehensive law that preceded California's in 1995 and resulted in the pioneering designation of Digital Signature Trust Co., a Zions Bancorp. subsidiary, as a licensed certificate authority. To bring consistency at the federal level, Sen. Spencer Abraham (R-Mich.) this year introduced two bills addressing the issue. The Millennium Digital Commerce Act sets out to clarify the legal status of electronic signatures in general, while the Electronic Securities Transaction Act focuses on the securities industry. http://www.americanbanker.com Contact: http://www.americanbanker.com
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
fyi - okay w revisions to #3 and #4? #3 reiterates that we administratively agreed to a $41.9mm value. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:56 PM To: Saunders, James Cc: [email protected] Subject: Management rep letter update Jim - Left you a voicemail. I have to run to a 1 pm meeting. We will need to get a mgmt rep when all this is over since the financials will be refiled and encorporated into EOTTs filings. Please look over. The underlines mean the text is new to the rep letters you have signed in the past, but it is text that is simply copied and pasted from the SEC responses. The highlighted item is as such because we need to verify if the statement is still correct. (See attached file: Mgmt Rep Update EGP 8K2.doc) *******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer******************* Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Believe it or not, I have booked my trip to London and Paris. I am coming out there around October 4 with my freind Deb and her freind Christie. We are staying at Mark Frevert's flat. Hopefully, we can get together for lunch or dinner during that time. I'll get back to you in a couple of months wonce I know more about our plans.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I will be taking Friday p.m. off to meet stove repair guy & contractor.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Please note the change of time, and the room that Nyree kindly found for us. Eugenio
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
No problem -----Original Message----- From: DuBose, Heidi Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:21 AM To: Whitt, Mark Subject: monday Mark - I understand this is short notice, but I'm heading out of town this weekend, and was wondering if you'd mind if I take Monday off? Thanks! Heidi
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Sen. Richard Lugar (R-IN), Chairman of the Senate Agriculture Committee, has officially agreed to sponsor legislation drafted by Sen. Tom Daschle (D-SD) -- titled the "Renewable Fuels Act". A summary is attached. The two Senators are planning to introduce the bill attached) in the next few days, and then selectively pursue co-sponsors. Senators Lugar and Daschle are expected to meet with Senate Environment Committee Chairman Bob Smith (R-NH) in the near future. I met with Senate Environment Committee staff yesterday, who indicated that they would like to hold a May 25 Committee mark up of S. 1886 (Smith-Inhofe-Feinstein bill), which they consider the "primary" vehicle for considering RFG and MTBE issues. Chairman Smith will not likely endorse the Daschle/Lugar bill, but will open the door for dialogue "with the ethanol interests." One of the primary issues that Committee staff have not been able to resolve is how to get ethanol support for oxygenate waiver legislation. Lugar and Daschle will likely have a great deal of impact on how much of their bill is considered along with S. 1886 at the May 25 markup. Pro-ethanol provisions may not see much support at the Senate Environment Committee level, but if the legislation moves to the Senate floor, there could be much more support for some of Lugar's/Daschle's proposals. I will keep you posted as the legislation develops and as our efforts to find support for MTBE producer "incentives" continues. Jeff Keeler Director, Environmental Strategies Enron (202) 466-9157
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Please find attached the current copy of the EnronOnline Weekly Public Report and Key Messages, including slides and statistics for public consumption. The information contained in the attachments can be communicated to audiences outside the company and should be used to ensure that we present a consistent message to the public. Please ensure that this email is distributed to anyone in your group who needs to discuss EnronOnline with individuals outside the company. This report is not intended to be used as a stand-alone presentation, nor that all the information be used in a single presentation or customer communication.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
This is for you. Sorry I sent to another Karen. Fortunately she is in my group and I was able to go the machine since she was not at work and eliminate it from the mail and trash shortly thereafter. Attached is a draft proposal for the Chairman, pls. review and share comments! Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2000 04:59 PM --------------------------- Chris Germany 12/15/99 12:32 PM To: "Germany Jr, Don (WD)" <[email protected]> cc: Subject: RE: FW: I think so. I believe several people will be here on the 1st.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Aaron, I will execute and send back by fax Wed morning. Who should I fax to for signature on Enron's side? Steve Hase
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
On a quarterly basis, the Executive Compensation group provides a report to the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors which details Executive Committee member stock holidings. Such holdings include: shares held in a family trust, your personal brokerage account, in certificate form, or in an IRA. any shares held in connection with Company plans (i.e., ESOP, savings plans, phantom shares, option grants, or restricted stock grants), although shares acquired that are held free-and-clear should be included. Because of your inclusion in the Executive Committee, we will be requesting this data from you prior to each quarter's report. Your response is greatly appreciated. However, with the recent announcement and the revised Committees, I am in the process of updating this report in preparation for the December 11 meeting. I have access to shares held in the Company Plans (last bullet above). Please provide me with your current personal ENE stock holdings (as of 11/30/00). Please contact me if you have any questions (713-345-8085). I appreciate your response. Mary
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Carter Perrin is back from Italy & will be sailing in the V-15 races on Friday night. He has promised 10,000 Lira to any HYC'ers who can beat him on the racecourse. There also will be a DJ, Cash Bar & Buffet afterwards so bring down your friends. We are trying to beat the record of 22 boats set earlier this summer. We will be going to Taco Milagro (Westheimer & Kirby) on Thursday night from 7-9 PM. We are attending the USA vs. South Africa Rugby game at Robinson Stadium (UH) on Dec. 1 @ 2 PM. HYC Tailgate party & BBQ before the game. Purchase your tickets online at: www.usa-eagles.org/tickets/index.html DAMIEN GODDARD
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Start Date: 4/24/01; HourAhead hour: 12; No ancillary schedules awarded. Variances detected. Variances detected in Generation schedule. Variances detected in Load schedule. LOG MESSAGES: PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001042412.txt ---- Generation Schedule ---- $$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE. Details: (Hour: 12 / Preferred: 0.00 / Final: 0.00) TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: EES MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01 UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2 ---- Load Schedule ---- $$$ Variance found in table tblLoads. Details: (Hour: 12 / Preferred: 133.85 / Final: 133.30) TRANS_TYPE: FINAL LOAD_ID: SDG1 MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01 SC_ID: EPMI
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
The $.10 rate should be correct. D Enron North America Corp. From: Megan Parker @ ENRON 03/08/2001 12:33 PM To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Tenaska IV Transport 10/00 That's great. What about deal 452475? We have $0.10 and we are being billed $0.11 for meter 25000200 on contract 1856. Also, I faxed the Oct 2000 TXU invoices to Trisha Hughes so she can look into the Dec 2000 and forward problem. Megan
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Ken & Jeff, We would like to extend an invitation to you for an event at the Guggenheim Museum in New York, honoring the Frank Gehry Exhibit which Enron is sponsoring. Frank Gehry, a celebrated architect whose building appears at the end of our Ode to Why commercial, personifies innovation in the way he has "asked why," challenging nearly every convention in his field. Enron will have a table of 10 at the Trustee Opening Gala Dinner on May 16th, with cocktails at 7pm and a seated dinner at 8:30pm. The Gala starts with a private viewing of the exhibition, followed by a seated dinner for 280 people in the Rotunda of the museum. Attendees are comprised of Trustees, government dignitaries, artists, curators and celebrities. Several business unit executives are using this forum to take potential customers and we would like to know if you are interested in attending. Please advise. Thanks, Steve
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Attached are the Year-to-date deals through 11/8/01. Lex Carroll Enron East Power Marketing, Inc. Midwest Origination 713-853-5426
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
The steel group is considering doing a physical and financial transaction with a Mexican counterparty. Are there any limitations that I should be aware of with respect to the derivative transaction? Carol St. Clair EB 3889 713-853-3989 (Phone) 713-646-3393 (Fax) [email protected]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 2/29/00. Regards Molly
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
=========================================================================== NEW RESEARCH AT WWW.FORRESTER.COM -- 1/25/2002 =========================================================================== Web Services Technology Delivers Important Benefits Web services technology lowers integration and connection costs, improves productivity, and fosters more agile partnerships, while extending the value of your existing enterprise systems. Forrester's Technology Leadership Forum will answer key questions and help you master the Web services landscape. Keynote speakers include: Dennis H. Jones, Vice Chairman, President, and COO, Commerce One Stuart A. Kauffman, M.D., Chief Scientific Officer and Chairman, BiosGroup John S. Leggate, Group Vice President, Digital Business, BP Phillip Merrick, Founder, Chairman, and CEO, webMethods Gregory J. Owens, Chairman and CEO, Manugistics Group Greg Papadopoulos, Senior Vice President and CTO, Sun Microsystems John Shewchuk, .NET Architect, Microsoft Roger Siboni, President and CEO, E.piphany Rod A. Smith, Vice President, Emerging Technologies, Software Group, IBM Richard Taggart, Director, Enterprise Technology Architecture Integration and Standards, General Motors Forrester's Technology Leadership Forum Web Services: The Next Technology Strategy February 3-5, 2002 The Phoenician, Scottsdale, Ariz. For more information or to register, please call our Events Hotline at +1 888/343-6786 or visit us at http://www.forrester.com/Events/Overview/0,5158,441,00.html =========================================================================== NEW TechStrategy(TM) Research: 6 Reports 20 Briefs NEW Technographics(R) Research: 1 Data Overview 5 Data Snapshots NEW TechRankings(TM) Research: 1 TechInsight 4 Category Updates =========================================================================== TECHSTRATEGY RESEARCH Building Tier Zero Auto Collaboration - Report W. Daniel Garretson, January 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Report/0,1338,13024,00.html Collaborative product development promises big gains as automakers bring better vehicles to market faster. But to capture benefits, OEMs must use emerging online tools to shift process ownership to tier zero suppliers. Canada's Collaborative EBPP Future - Report Ron Shevlin, January 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Report/0,1338,14374,FF.html Today, Canadian companies and consumers eschew online bill presentment. To spur growth, epost and e-route must build a cooperative hub for all billers and re-focus their competitive efforts on front-end services. Making Mobile Gaming Pay - Report Carsten Schmidt, January 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Report/0,1338,14049,00.html 130 million Europeans will play mobile games by 2005 if the industry can move past today's broken business models. Operators must track and share revenues while marketers sponsor branded games. Sizing US Consumer Telecom - Report Charles Golvin, January 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Report/0,1338,12812,FF.html New communication options already displace plain old telephone service in 1.7% of households. Traditional telcos' share of the consumer communication budget will drop from 49% in 2001 to 33% in 2006. How To Choose Online Partners - Report Anna Glos, September 2001 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Report/0,1338,14389,FF.html Online financial service providers look to distribution partnerships to carry them through this period of slow sales. This strategy guarantees financial success only if firms select the right online partners. The Net Tames The Pension Beast - Report Nastasja Senn, September 2001 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Report/0,1338,14197,FF.html Financial service providers (FSPs) must implement Internet solutions to reduce service and administration costs of Germany's new pension system. Firms that act now can use pension networks for cross-selling in 2004. AT&T Bolsters Its Managed Services Portfolio - Brief Maribel Dolinov, January 24, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14414,FF.html Online Retail 2001: Closing The Books - Brief Carrie A. Johnson, January 24, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14410,FF.html Consors: A Stepping-Stone To European Expansion - Brief Remus Brett, January 23, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14392,FF.html JXTA: Helping To Build The X Internet - Brief Laura Koetzle, January 23, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14411,FF.html Medic Needs A Hand To Compete With Cerner - Brief Bradford J. Holmes, January 23, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14412,FF.html Connected Devices Reinvent Consumer Electronics - Brief Carl D. Howe, January 22, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14404,FF.html UltimateTV Woes Energize ITV Competitors - Brief Josh Bernoff, January 22, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14405,FF.html B2B Value Chain Selling: Baby Steps For 2002 - Brief Laurie M. Orlov, January 21, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14397,FF.html Five Predictions For Online Banking In 2002 - Brief Ron Shevlin, January 21, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14403,FF.html P2P Software Needs An Enterprise Makeover - Brief David Metcalfe, January 21, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14401,FF.html Akamai, Digital Island: Slug It Out In The Market - Brief Andrew Parker, January 18, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14395,FF.html ISM/Forrester Report On eBusiness: Q4 2001 - Brief Bruce D. Temkin, January 18, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14390,FF.html 2001: Supply Chain ISVs Pummeled - Brief Stacie S. Kilgore, January 17, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14382,FF.html Fox's Wide-Screen Super Bowl Is An Industry Model - Brief Josh Bernoff, January 17, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14394,FF.html Healthcare Quality Leaps Into The Mainstream - Brief Bradford J. Holmes, January 17, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14396,FF.html Oxford Invites Its Members To Data Negotiations - Brief Michael J. Barrett, January 17, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14387,FF.html German Regulator: Don't Kill The Broadband Goose - Brief Lars Godell, January 16, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14391,FF.html Maptuit Drives The X Internet Into Logistics - Brief Stacie S. Kilgore, January 16, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14388,FF.html Offshore Outsourcing Restructures In 2002 - Brief Christine Spivey Overby, January 14, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14373,FF.html Don't Put A PC In My Entertainment Network - Brief Josh Bernoff, January 11, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/0,1317,14345,FF.html =========================================================================== TECHNOGRAPHICS RESEARCH Affluent January 2002 Data Overview: Covers The Economic Downturn, Financial Products, And Asset Management Firms - Data Overview Ekaterina O. Walsh, Ph.D., January 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/DataOverview/0,2740,12630,00.html Online Ads Attract Valuable Shoppers - Data Snapshot Christopher M. Kelley, January 16, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/DataSnapshot/0,1317,14381,FF.html The Right Media For Targeting Web Buyers - Data Snapshot Steve Yonish, January 16, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/DataSnapshot/0,1317,14380,FF.html Europe's Fastest Growing Technologies - Data Snapshot Erwan de Montigny, January 14, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/DataSnapshot/0,1317,14265,FF.html Web Content Lures Twentysomethings - Data Snapshot Christopher M. Kelley, January 14, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/DataSnapshot/0,1317,14300,FF.html Europe's Online Credit Landscape - Data Snapshot Benjamin Ensor, January 11, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/DataSnapshot/0,1317,14274,FF.html =========================================================================== TECHRANKINGS RESEARCH SAP And Commerce One Split: Multi-ERP Firms Win - TechInsight Sharyn Leaver, January 22, 2002 http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/TechInsight/0,4109,14400,00.html =========================================================================== REPRINTS Forrester clients can order additional hard copies of our Reports and Briefs; research is also available electronically to post on your Web site. Please contact your Account Manager for more information. If you would like to reach us, please click on the "Contact Us" link on our Web site's left-hand navigation bar. You will have the option to email your Forrester Account Manager or the Customer Center. You can also call us at +1 888/265-7145 (toll-free in the United States and Canada only) or at +1 617/613-5730, Monday-Friday, 8 a.m.-7 p.m. EST, or email us at [email protected]. Unsubscribing If you do not want to receive this email anymore, please go to: http://www.forrester.com/Listserv?list=WEEKLY_RESEARCH&action=unsub Technographics is a registered trademark of Forrester Research, Inc. TechRankings is a trademark of Forrester Research, Inc.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
What is this about? -----Original Message----- From: Drummond, Christine Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 2:46 PM To: Colwell, Wes; Hayslett, Rod; Marlow, Keith; Lydecker Jr., Richard Cc: Campos, Kathy; Tijerina, Shirley; Petry, Norma Subject: NEPCO Earnings Meeting has been scheduled per Richard Lydecker Thursday, November 1, 2001 9:00-10:00 am EB3305 - Wes's Office Subject: NEPCO Earnings Attendees: Richard Lydecker; Wes Colwell, Rod Hayslett, Keith Marlow (Pending Availability)
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Just FYI.....the first email I sent to you had a typo in the letter from Ken Lay. It was fixed before we sent it to businesses. Be sure to use the attachments in this message if you plan to use it in your communications or foward it to anyone. THanks!!
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
-----Original Message----- From: Baker, Ron Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 2:30 PM To: Ephross, Joel Subject: Re: FW: FW: Raptor 2 - Sale of CEG/RioGas Joel, Yes, the swap would need to be transfered by both parties. I don't know anything about a "minibook" or the documentation being requested. Let me know if you have more questions. Thanks, Ron Joel Ephross/ENRON@enronXgate 02/28/2001 01:21 PM To: Ron Baker/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: FW: FW: Raptor 2 - Sale of CEG/RioGas Ron, do you know the answer to this? -----Original Message----- From: Shackleton, Sara Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 12:05 PM To: Funk, Brenda L. Cc: Ephross, Joel Subject: Re: FW: Raptor 2 - Sale of CEG/RioGas Brenda: Thanks. Also, do you have a Raptor IV minibook? We don't have any Raptor IV documentation. Do both swap parties intend to transfer positions? Sara Shackleton Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a Houston, Texas 77002 713-853-5620 (phone) 713-646-3490 (fax) [email protected] Brenda L Funk/ENRON@enronXgate 02/28/2001 11:50 AM To: Joel Ephross/ENRON@enronXgate, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: FW: Raptor 2 - Sale of CEG/RioGas Just to clarify... the transfer of the swap has not been put on hold, but the sale of the assets hedged by the swaps. I have been working on the asset sale out of Rawhide, but I'm not familiar with the transfer of the swap. Sara, I will send executed copies of the swaps shortly. Thanks, B -----Original Message----- From: Funk, Brenda L. Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 11:35 AM To: Ephross, Joel Cc: Shackleton, Sara Subject: RE: Raptor 2 - Sale of CEG/RioGas Just an update... I spoke with V&E this morning and the sale has been put on hold. The negotiations broke down last week and, with the holiday, there has been no further progress. I'll let you know when I get an update. Thanks, B -----Original Message----- From: Ephross, Joel Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Shackleton, Sara; Funk, Brenda L. Subject: FW: Raptor 2 - Sale of CEG/RioGas -----Original Message----- From: Baker, Ron Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 9:12 AM To: Siurek, Ryan; McKean, George; McKillop, Gordon; Ephross, Joel Subject: Raptor 2 - Sale of CEG/RioGas FYI I was just notified that the sale of CEG and RioGas which are hedged in Raptor 2 will likely close next week. Current estimates indicate that the loss on the sale will be around $30MM. It is expected that the sale of the one remaining South American LDC will result in gains that will more than offset this loss. Obviously, those expectations can change, but I wanted to keep everyone informed on this. Ryan - This expected realized loss is exactly the situation which most concerned us in the meeting with Patti this week. Is there anything we can do to push them towards resolving that timing of realized losses is irrelevent, and this is not an issue?
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
OK for me. Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate 05/08/2001 08:29 AM To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate Subject: FW: Can Gas Fin Opt Put & Call - please process The product long descriptions in the attachment directly below will fall under the new product types CAN Gas Financial Option Call and CAN Gas Financial Option Put. Credit (Tom Moran) has approved copying the profiles for the new product type from the following: CAN Gas Financial Swap Please respond no later than 10 a.m. on Wednesday, May 9. Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Lozano, Melba Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 2:07 PM To: Lees, Lisa; Sever, Stephanie Cc: Cass, Robert B.; Walker, Chris; Meredith, Kevin; Draper, Lon Subject: Can Gas Fin Opt Put & Call - please process Lisa/Stephanie: Can Gas Fin Opt Call Can Gas Fin Opt Put Was uploaded a couple of weeks ago as an internal product. They have not created any products under them. Lon Draper in Canada wants to upload the following profile if it's ok with Legal and Credit. Let me know what you find out. Thanks, Melba #1 Product Type name: Can Gas Fin Opt Call (1992) GTC: Same as Can Gas Fin Swap (1063) Profile: Copy external profiles (Bid, offer, tenor, investment grade flag, masters) from Can Gas Fin Swap (1063) EXCLUDE BROKERS/Broker Master Users & Broker Sub Users from file upload #2 Product Type name: Can Gas Fin Opt Put (1993) GTC: Same as Can Gas Fin Swap (1063) Profile: Copy external profiles (Bid, offer, tenor, investment grade flag, masters) from Can Gas Fin Swap (1063) EXCLUDE BROKERS/Broker Master Users & Broker Sub Users from file upload
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Tracy and/or Rod: Just curious about what happened to the proposed trade that we were going to do with Kaiser. Is there anything that the lawyers need to do at this point? Carol St. Clair EB 3889 713-853-3989 (Phone) 713-646-3393 (Fax) [email protected]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Opps. Would help if I included Theresa. -----Original Message----- From: Germany, Chris Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:08 AM To: Germany, Chris; Kelly, Katherine L.; Mazowita, Mike; Greif, Donna; Denetsosie, Troy Cc: Hill, Garrick Subject: RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002 Sold 10,000 dth of Conger gas to TXU for 4/30/02 at $3.24, that wraps up the sales for April 2002. Theresa, I've attached my worksheet showing how much we sold TXU for April and what price. The daily volumes are in column M and the daily prices are in column N. We should bill TXU for 301,000 dth and a dollar amount of $952,055.00. Call me if you have any questions. Thanks << File: MARGAS.xls >> -----Original Message----- From: Germany, Chris Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 1:39 PM To: Germany, Chris; Kelly, Katherine L.; Mazowita, Mike; Greif, Donna; Denetsosie, Troy Cc: Hill, Garrick Subject: RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002 Sold 10,000 dth of Conger gas to TXU for 4/27-29/02 at $3.05. -----Original Message----- From: Germany, Chris Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:53 AM To: Germany, Chris; Kelly, Katherine L.; Mazowita, Mike; Greif, Donna; Denetsosie, Troy Cc: Hill, Garrick Subject: RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002 Sold 10,000 dth of Conger gas to TXU for 4/26//02 at $3.24 Also received a call from Jeff at Lone Star telling us to work a little harder at working off the imbalance. -----Original Message----- From: Germany, Chris Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 3:22 PM To: Germany, Chris; Kelly, Katherine L.; Mazowita, Mike; Greif, Donna; Denetsosie, Troy Cc: Hill, Garrick Subject: RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002 Sold 10,.000 dth of Conger gas to TXU for 4/25 at $3.29 -----Original Message----- From: Germany, Chris Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:49 AM To: Germany, Chris; Kelly, Katherine L.; Mazowita, Mike; Greif, Donna; Denetsosie, Troy Cc: Hill, Garrick Subject: RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002 We sold 10,000 dth of the Conger gas to TXU for 4/24 at $3.40 -----Original Message----- From: Germany, Chris Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:16 PM To: Germany, Chris; Kelly, Katherine L.; Mazowita, Mike; Greif, Donna; Denetsosie, Troy Cc: Hill, Garrick; Vos, Theresa; McMichael Jr., Ed Subject: RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002 OK, Kathy and Troy have pointed out how bad my previous email was. I'm sure I was thinking about lunch. Sabra Dinari scheduled the gas on Lone Start. She quit on Friday. I will be doing the scheduling until further notice. Kathy Kelly will be my backup when I'm out. -----Original Message----- From: Germany, Chris Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 11:13 AM To: Kelly, Katherine L.; Mazowita, Mike; Greif, Donna; Denetsosie, Troy Cc: Hill, Garrick; Vos, Theresa; McMichael Jr., Ed Subject: RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002 Sold 10,000 dth of Conger to TXU for 4/23 at $3.37 Our scheduler, Sabra Dinari, quit on Friday so I will be handling the noms for awhile and Kathy Kelly will. I think its easier for me to do the noms on this since I'm selling point specific gas and we are not putting this activity in Sitar/Unify. Theresa, looks like I will be the one addressing the accounting questions. -----Original Message----- From: Kelly, Katherine L. Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 8:28 AM To: Germany, Chris; Mazowita, Mike; Dinari, Sabra L.; Denetsosie, Troy Subject: Sales to TXU for April 2002 I've sold TXU 10,000 dth at $3.14 for Sat.4/20 through Mon. 4/22 Sabra, I sold them 10,000 of Conger gas -----Original Message----- From: Germany, Chris Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:24 AM To: Germany, Chris; Mazowita, Mike; Kelly, Katherine L.; Dinari, Sabra L.; Denetsosie, Troy Cc: Hill, Garrick Subject: RE: Lone Star Sales to TXU for April 2002 Sold TXU 15,000 dth at $3.315 for Fri 4/19/02. Sabra, I sold them 10,000 of Conger gas and 5,000 of the Sprayberry. -----Original Message----- From: Germany, Chris Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 8:20 AM To: Germany, Chris; Mazowita, Mike; Kelly, Katherine L.; Dinari, Sabra L. Cc: Hill, Garrick Subject: Lone Star Sales to TXU for April 2002 Sold TXU 10,000 dth at $3.17 for Thur 4/18/02. I checked on the price with Darren Farmer at AEP and he said that's where Waha was trading so I don't feel like we are being taken advantage of too much. -----Original Message----- From: Germany, Chris Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:12 AM To: Mazowita, Mike; Kelly, Katherine L.; Dinari, Sabra L. Cc: Germany, Chris; Hill, Garrick Subject: Lone Star sales for Wed 4/17/02 Sold TXU 10,000 dth at $3.27 for Wednesday 4/17/02.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Hey Katy, Sorry no correspondence in a while. I wish it was a case of no news is good news, but if you've spoken with Em recently you know that is not so. Anyway, I wanted to touch base with you regarding my visit to London. I of course want to try and time it when both you and Em are in town. So...I was thinking of flying out on Oct 4 and returning Oct 9, that way I would have a weekend over there with y'all. I know you're planning a trip to Egypt around then so just get back to me and let me know if you'll actually be in London any of those days. Hope all is well with you. Talk to you soon, Susan
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Congratulations. Even though it's the EEI agreement, getting Edison to agree to sign something is an achievement. Good luck landing deals. Jeff Mary Hain@ECT 11/17/2000 01:51 PM To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Southern California Edison Company FYI. This is just a master under which we can do individual agreements. ---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 11/17/2000 11:55 AM --------------------------- Rhonda L Denton 11/17/2000 08:13 AM To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle Schultz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gretchen Lotz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dean Laurent/HOU/ECT@ECT, John D Suarez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jan M King/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cyril Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, James E Terrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Corry Bentley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Lorenz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thresa A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell T Kelley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Holli Krebs/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Choi/SF/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Mead/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip Platter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Smith L Day/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Brett Hunsucker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Kinser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Benson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul J Broderick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janet H Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Jesse Bryson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stanley Cocke/PDX/ECT@ECT, Michael M Driscoll/PDX/ECT@ECT, Doug Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joy Werner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elsie Lew/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Houston/Corp/Enron@Enron, Amy Horton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kim Durham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda Robinson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rudy Acevedo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diana Allen/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ted Ballinger/NA/Enron@Enron, Don Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Burnett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Guzman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Larry F Campbell/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike Carson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Alan Chen/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jason Choate/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lawrence Clayton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin Cline/Corp/Enron@Enron, Terri Clynes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith Comeaux/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karla Compean/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Crawford/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mike Curry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Oscar Dalton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clint Dean/Corp/Enron@Enron, Todd DeCook/Corp/Enron@Enron, George Diaz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Errigo/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Miguel L Garcia/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gerald Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Gordon/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brent Hebert/HOU/ECT@ect, Juan Hernandez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wayne Herndon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Hopley/HOU/ECT@ect, Richard Hrabal/HOU/ECT@ect, Rika Imai/NA/Enron@Enron, Alton Jackson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry Jester/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gary Justice/NA/Enron@Enron, MICHAEL KELLY/ENRON@Gateway, Grace Kim/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff King/Corp/Enron@Enron, Madhup Kumar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Justin Laverell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris Lenartowicz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peter Makkai/NA/Enron@Enron, Dave Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Posey Martinez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Keller Mayeaux/Corp/Enron@Enron, Doug Miller/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Narsimha Misra/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Olinde/Corp/Enron@Enron, Andy Pace/NA/Enron@Enron, Juan Padron/NA/Enron@Enron, Ricardo Perez/NA/Enron@Enron, Joseph Piotrowski/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Quenet/NA/Enron@Enron, Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Ryan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Saibi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Zachary Sampson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Anna Santucci/NA/Enron@Enron, Janelle Scheuer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Erik Serio/Corp/Enron@Enron, Doug Sewell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Stalford/NA/Enron@Enron, Chad Starnes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joe Stepenovitch/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Symms/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul D Thomas/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg Trefz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maria Valdes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joseph Wagner/NA/Enron@Enron, Christopher Watts/NA/Enron@Enron, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay Wills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, George Wood/Corp/Enron@Enron, Alex Wong/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Valarie Sabo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Fran Chang/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Southern California Edison Company We have received the executed Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement dated 11/14/2000 from the referenced CP. Copies will be given to Legal and Credit. THIS IS AN EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE (EEI) AGREEMENT.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Attached please find the Power Credit Watch List for November 19: Please reply with any questions. Kortney x30616
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I was in La Madel. this morning (Sun) having coffee and juice, and I thought for SURE I was going to see you there! Alexandra Saler@EES 01/04/2001 10:54 AM To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: I just spoke to my sister and she goes to the doctor on monday. the baby's heart is the size of a poppy seed, and the baby is the size of a bean. she and josh are calling it their "beanie baby." isn't that cute? To: Alexandra Saler/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Re: Have a great evening--I'm out of here! Alexandra Saler@EES 01/03/2001 09:46 AM To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: I know what you mean. let's figure out when we both have some free time and maybe we can go to a fun dinner and blow off some steam. To: Alexandra Saler/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Re: I think my head spun, then exploded. Ditto on the busy part! Trying to get Max and Chloe ready for their departure Friday, meeting with contractors, and work. OY. Alexandra Saler@EES 01/02/2001 11:35 AM To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: happy new year! I hope that you are having a great day. my head is spinning....I have so much to do, I don't know where to start!
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
couple things. i was wondering ... did wildhorse declare unprofitability? and scott suggested that instead of telling them that we will be considering laying our own gathering system, [don't tell them now what we may do], instead of telling them that, to tell them that we will need to quickly evaluate other alternatives in getting our gas to the plant. that we will need to do this quickly, because of the long lead times needed. joan ---------------------- Forwarded by Joan Quick/HOU/ECT on 07/28/2000 09:47 AM --------------------------- From: Joan Quick on 07/28/2000 09:39 AM To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Wildhorse Letter i guess this looks good to me. you do ask for a response by aug 1st, which means that they will get this on monday, and have 24 hrs to turn it around. didn't know if that's what you wanted. i found something small for you to change up. To: Dan J Bump/DEN/ECT@Enron, Joan Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara Gray Subject: Wildhorse Letter Attached is the latest version of the Wildhorse Entrada Letter. Please review. I reviewed the letter with Jim Osborne and Ken Krisa yesterday and should get their comments today. My plan is to Fedex to Midland for Ken's signature tomorrow morning and from there it will got to Wildhorse.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
You may already know this, but I heard from guys at Nipsco that they did their first nom on Vector yesterday. Also, Border interconnect expected Dec. 15th. The heater hit a bridge so they are trying to do some field repairs. Not much else to report.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Hi Folks, Here's how I see the matchups this week. PLEASE NOTE: See the cheatsheets online at www.footballguys.com for exactly where I rank players and to determine who to start. I always receive emails asking me how I can have a guy ranked highly on the cheatsheet but listed under a matchup that favors the Defense. Just because one matchup may be more favorable than another, that doesn't necessarily mean I'd start the player with the best matchup. Peyton Manning may have a horrible matchup one week but unless you're sitting on Kurt Warner or Daunte Culpepper, Manning's your guy no matter who he's lining up against. The matchup info is meant to be just one more tool in your box when it comes to deciding between players. Note: I've used the player stats sorted by performance over the last four weeks extensively in developing these write-ups. Stats are provided by Mike Hall's excellent FLM League Management Software. http://www.fflm.com/ for more info. Let's get to it. Joe /**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/ Locks: These games feature Defenses that should be overmatched against the Offense. New Orleans Passing Game vs Atlanta Defense A good dose of the Atlanta Defense may be just what New Orleans and QB Aaron Brooks needed. The Falcons are awful ranking # 31 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks. They rank # 29 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs. Brooks will be throwing to WRs Joe Horn and Willie Jackson. Albert Connell is there but not a big factor. Of course, the biggest news from last week was the awakening of TE Cam Cleeland. He could play a big role if he get's fired up. Green Bay Passing Game vs Minnesota Defense You have little choice but to start Brett Favre. Last week, he hung 3 TDs on the Ravens so I think he can handle the Vikings. WR Antonio Freeman awoke from a slumber and did it in a big way. The question of the week is can he continue? Part of his success can be attributed to his public demand for more passes (which Favre said he approved of and made good on his promises to target Freeman more) Although an ankle injury to WR Bill Schroeder was no doubt a factor as well. It looks like Schroeder will play but the ankle is still sore. If Schroeder can go, both look to be a good start against the Viking's defense ranked # 28 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks. They're also # 28 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs. TE Bubba Franks is a must start as it seems every pass he catches is for a TD. Jacksonville Passing Game vs Buffalo Defense After a hot start, it seems like it's been forever since the Jaguars have scored a passing TD. That should change this week as they face a soft Buffalo Defense that ranks # 25 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks. They're even worse when it comes to Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs ranking # 28. Pretty much all the Jaguar skill positions look good here. WRs Jimmy Smith and Keenan McCardell are must starts. They'll be too much for Cornerbacks Ken Irvin and Antoine Winfield. TE Kyle Brady is a nice play here too. He was the target of 5 passes in week 4. Kansas City Passing Game vs Arizona Defense A game against Arizona may be just what the disappointing Chiefs need. Trent Green's been nowhere near as good as everyone (including us) hoped but I'm not sure it's all his fault. He's had trouble keeping a WR Corps healthy and teams are doubling and tripling TE Tony Gonzalez, their best player. Priest Holmes has put a spark in the running game and that'll help. WR Derrick Alexander only caught one pass last week but he had 8 thrown his way so he's getting the opportunities. He'll likely make much better use of his chances this week against a Cardinal team that ranks # 22 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks. They rank # 26 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs so Green could break out as well. /**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/ Prime Matchups: These games feature Defenses that should have trouble stopping the Offense. Tennessee Passing Game vs Detroit Defense Steve McNair awoke last week and played a very solid game against Tampa Bay throwing for 230 yards and 1 TD. He'll have a much easier time this week against a Lion team that's hurting in the secondary. Detroit ranks # 13 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks but they're vulnerable. They rank # 29 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs. WR Kevin Dyson is probably the best bet for WRs. Derrick Mason is still nursing a bad ankle and his status isn't clear yet. Chris Sanders could see time too and he's been targeted some lately. Of course, the favorite receiver is still TE Frank Wycheck. St. Louis Passing Game vs New York Jets Defense Just start your Rams. Warner, Holt, Bruce and probably Hakim and TE Conwell all deserve starting status. Until I see it again, I'm calling the Giants game of last week an aberration. The Jets defense ranks # 20 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks but I'd start these guys against the AFC Pro Bowl Team. Pittsburgh Passing Game vs Tampa Bay Defense This could be an ugly game for the Steeler passing game. Tampa plays primarily zone defense which means Stewart will be forced to pick his spots from the pocket. And we all know, the pocket is no friend to Stewart who is best when he can run a little. Man coverage allows a QB more freedom to tuck and run with defenders in coverage. He will face a tough Defense with the talent to hold down WRs Hines Ward and Plaxico Burress. On the plus side, Tampa's given up a lot of yards to the passing game though ranking # 30 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks. They rank # 23 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs so the potential is there for Stewart to do something, I'm just not sure what it'll be . Carolina Passing Game vs Washington Defense QB Chris Weinke gets better each week. Is he playing well enough to carry your team right now? Probably not. But he might start getting there. The Redskins rank # 24 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks. Weinke's primary targets will be WR Muhsin Muhammad and TE Wesley Walls. Both should have decent opportunities this week. On the upside, Washington Cornerback Fred Smoot will likely be limited if he even plays with a bad knee. Denver Passing Game vs San Diego Defense QB Brian Griese has complained of shoulder pain all week and missed early practices but says he'll play Sunday. Gus Frerotte will go if Griese can't. Good luck getting a straight answer out of Skeletor Shanahan (love that guy) but if I had to guess, I'd play him. Weigh it out though if you have another solid option of course. The Chargers are looking suddenly very beatable after New England's Tom Brady hung 364 yards and 2 TDs on them. The key will be Eddie Kennison staying on a roll. He takes the incredible pressure off Rod Smith and can stretch the defense keeping Safety Rodney Harrison back where he belongs and off the line. San Diego ranks # 18 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks but can definitely be thrown on. Detroit Passing Game vs Tennessee Defense What got into Charlie Batch? Whatever it is, let's hope he can keep it up. He posted some great numbers last week with 345 yards, 3 TDs and most importantly, 0 interceptions. He'll try to keep it rolling against a suspect Titan defense that's ranked # 27 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks. They're ranked # 24 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs. Cornerback Samari Rolle is out again and that hurts. Germane Crowell may not know when to run out of bounds but he can rack up the yards. Look for him to do it again. Johnnie Morton will man the other spot and do well. In minor news, it looks like Herman Moore is done for the year with a torn muscle in his hip. /**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/ Even Matchups: These games feature no real advantage either way Washington Passing Game vs Carolina Defense Are you really down to this? If so, Tony Banks may be ok this week. Carolina ranks # 26 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks. And they're the worst team in the league in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs. Still though, I hate to think I'm putting too much faith in these guys. WR Rod Gardner is getting more looks than anyone at this point. Michael Westbrook scored last week and maybe he can build on that. TE Stephen Alexander is out with a bad ankle. San Diego Passing Game vs Denver Defense Flutie's fun to watch but make sure to understand this team is about RB LaDainian Tomlinson. I hear some comparisons to Denver's John Elway finding a young Terrell Davis but this isn't the same. Flutie just won't put up the stats consistently. Curtis Conway, Tim Dwight and Jeff Graham are all seeing about the same amount of work and that makes it tough to pick one. Unfortunately, TE Freddie Jones has been very inconsistent and frustrating for his owners. I'm not sure that will change. The Broncos are pretty solid against the pass ranking # 12 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks. They rank # 11 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs. Philadelphia Passing Game vs New York Giants Defense With a week off to prepare, look for the Eagles to come out firing. Somewhat like Green Bay did last week against Baltimore, look for them to focus on the pass against a defense that is extremely good against the run. They'll have their work cut out for them though. The Giants pass defense has been up and down. Of course, lately, they've been very up holding the high flying Rams to a mere mortal 15 points and no passing TDs. That's strong. But they rank just # 18 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks. They're a little tougher on QBs ranking # 10 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs. Donovan McNabb has two solid under rated WRs in Todd Pinkston and James Thrash that can stretch the field. TE Chad Lewis has been seeing a lot of balls thrown his way and could do damage here. New England Passing Game vs Indianapolis Defense Tom Brady continues to impress as he gains confidence in the system. He'll go against the Colts this week who have to be wondering where their Super Bowl aspirations have gone. The key in my opinion is WR Terry Glenn who brings an entirely new dimension to this team. Brady threw the ball his way 14 times last week. Troy Brown is a quiet option but he gets a ton of targets (16 last week) The Colts rank # 14 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks but rank # 8 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs. Chicago Passing Game vs Cincinnati Defense I'm looking for Jim Miller to bounce back from an awful game last week against Arizona. The Bengal defense is pretty solid ranking # 8 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks. They'll be without Cornerback Rodney Heath. Corner Robert Bean is probable with a leg injury so he's likely less than 100%. The Bengals rank # 18 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs so that's some encouragement. WR Marcus Robinson will have a size advantage on the Bengal Corners and watch for Marty Booker who was the target of more passes last week than was Robinson. /**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/ Downside Matchups: These games feature a Defense that could pose trouble for the Offense. New York Jets Passing Game vs St. Louis Defense With every passing week, it becomes more and more clear that this "new" offense is really just a slightly different way to get Curtis Martin the ball. And that's the smart move for Jet's fans. Vinny Testeverde draws a pretty tough matchup this week in the Rams who rank # 9 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks. They rank # 19 in in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs. Laveranues Coles has been getting plenty of looks and is a good play. Wayne Chrebet will handle the intermediate stuff as he always does. Atlanta Passing Game vs New Orleans Defense Chris Chandler still has plenty left in the tank (as long as he can protect his head) The Saints could cause trouble with an aggressive blitzing defense that's recorded 12 sacks already. That Super Dome floor isn't much softer than the carpet covered concrete of the Georgia Dome so injury is always a worry. New Orleans is tough ranking # 11 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks. They rank # 13 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs. Look for Chandler to focus on Terance Mathis and Shawn Jefferson as he did last week although Jefferson is risky listed as questionable with ankle / toe problems. Buffalo Passing Game vs Jacksonville Defense Will the week off benefit Rob Johnson? I really don't know. You know by now that I'm down on Johnson. He does have two potentially very good WRs though in Eric Moulds and Peerless Price. Both have underachieved this season and it's hard to know whether to blame them or Johnson. Jacksonville is average defending the pass ranking # 15 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks. They're much tougher in shutting down QBs though as they rank # 2 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs. Cornerback Fernando Bryant is Questionable with a bad foot and that'll be a big plus for the Bills if he can't go. Cincinnati Passing Game vs Chicago Defense It may not seem like a big deal, but the Bengals will miss WR Chad Johnson who's out with a broken collarbone. He was a true deep threat that took heat off of Darnay Scott and freed up Peter Warrick underneath. We'll see how they work without him. Jon Kitna continues to play a Trent Dilfer like "good enough to win" game and I don't see that changing a lot. The Bengals would love to get games like last week's 201 yard, 1 TD and 0 interception (the biggie) out of Kitna. This offense is all about RB Corey Dillon. The Bears are tougher against the run than they are the pass. Chicago ranks # 19 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks. They bring a tough pass rush with 11 sacks in their last 3 games. All in all, a pretty tough matchup. Cleveland Passing Game vs Baltimore Defense Green Bay showed last week one way to beat Baltimore was to concede the running game and focus on throwing the ball. That's fine as long as you have Brett Favre under center. Tim Couch may one day be very good, but he's a long ways from Favre today. The Ravens rank # 10 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks so they can be thrown on. Kevin Johnson has been hot for the Browns and Quincy Morgan is getting almost as many balls thrown his way as Johnson. The Ravens bring two very good Cornerbacks in Duane Starks and Chris McAlister that'll make it a tough game for the Browns. Indianapolis Passing Game vs New England Defense If you can afford to bench Peyton Manning, you're deep enough at QB that you don't need our help. The Patriots are pretty tough ranking # 7 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks. They also rank # 6 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs. I'd still start Manning unless I had a great option though. He's just too liable to have a great game against anyone. Same for Marvin Harrison. Jerome Pathon is still very iffy for this week and I'd avoid. Rookie Reggie Wayne is still learning the ropes and had 3 passes thrown his way last week. I'm not counting on a whole lot yet from him. /**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/ Defensive Slam Dunks: These games feature a very tough Defense posing major problems for the Offense. Tampa Bay Passing Game vs Pittsburgh Defense Must be something in the Nashville water that awoke both Steve McNair and Brad Johnson last week. Johnson finally listened to Keyshawn and threw him the ball 17 times Sunday. Both Johnsons had strong games and hopefully the light flicked on for Brad Johnson. Jacquez Green had several looks but clearly, this is a Johnson and Johnson team now. The Steelers are very tough against the pass ranking # 3 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks. They rank # 3 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs as well so it's pretty clear that it's a tough matchup for the Bucs. New York Giants Passing Game vs Philadelphia Defense After a heartbreaking loss to the Rams, the Giants face a very tough Eagle pass defense that's ranked # 1 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks. They rank # 5 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs so it'll be tough going for the Giants here. QB Kerry Collins hasn't been anything special lately and look for the Eagles to continue their huge array of blitzes that they love. He'll be throwing to Amani Toomer who needs to pick up the pace he started with early. Ike Hilliard is back but still not seeing as many passes thrown his way as Joe Jurevicius. Minnesota Passing Game vs Green Bay Defense For all the anti Viking talk, Culpepper continues to post some excellent Fantasy Stats. His rushing TDs are huge in many scoring systems. Of course, the big question this week is the health of Randy Moss' ankle. Coach Denny Green came out this week and said Moss has been limited by the effects of his ankle sprain suffered before his rookie season. I personally would come up with something better than that... Denny Green is a player's coach and it wouldn't surprise me at all if this were primarily a protection move for his star WR. I'd fully expect Moss to play but certainly, he's a risk. The Packers are very tough against the pass ranking # 4 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks. They're also # 4 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs. With RB Michael Bennett out this week, the Vikings will likely be throwing all day so you know they'll be getting the opportunities. It's a very tough matchup though. Arizona Passing Game vs Kansas City Defense Plummer's always a roll of the dice and this week isn't any different. He'll face a KC defense that's very tough statistically against the pass ranking # 3 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks. When it comes to Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs, they rank # 7. David Boston is clearly Plummer's best option and he'll match up pretty well with the Chiefs. MarTay Jenkins and Frank Sanders will see some action but you'll be hard pressed to start them I'd think. Probably a risky matchup this week for a Cardinal team that's suspect in talent to begin with. Baltimore Passing Game vs Cleveland Defense Elvis Grbac returned back to reality last week with a disappointing game against the Packers. He was held to 138 yards, 1 TD and 2 Interceptions also suffering a neck injury / concussion. He's listed as probable and should improve upon those numbers this week but not by a lot. The Browns are tough against the pass ranking # 6 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks. More impressively, they rank # 1 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs. Cornerbacks Daylon McCutcheon and Corey Fuller should do a pretty nice job of matching up with WRs Travis Taylor and Qadry Ismail. Of course, Shannon Sharpe is always a threat. Bottom line, this is a tough matchup for Baltimore. /**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/ Bryant Analytics, Inc. All Rights Reserved 1999-2001 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Restore financial balance to your life. Please fill out the following form so a certified counselor can provide you with your financial options. Your information will be kept strictly confidential. http://www.eloangroup.com/ <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> * To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to: http://i.pm0.net/remove?funnymoney:10 * Enter your email address ([email protected]) in the field provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "funnymoney:10". OR... * Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line. This message was sent to address [email protected] X-PMG-Recipient: [email protected] <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> pmguid:1c.1ctb.803w8
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
-----Original Message----- From: Fleming, Matthew B. Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 4:07 PM To: Barker, James R. Subject: FW: Happy Hour -----Original Message----- From: Fleming, Matthew B. Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:34 PM To: Draper, David; Guerra, Jesus; Migliano, Andrew; Pendegraft, Sherry; Reynolds, Roger; Tate, Paul; Vanderhorst, Barry; Bray, Hayden; Clements, Andrea; Diza, Alain; Driscoll-Ernest, Marde L.; Gerl, Jeff; Jennings, Jennifer; Lynn, Jamie; Salinas, Daniel; Smith, Rhonda; Smith, Stephanie; Whittaker, Brandon; Merril, Deborah D.; Arnold, Laura R.; Bob Merril (E-mail); Jay Ory (E-mail); Mc nic (E-mail); Chmil, Shawn; Fleming, Matthew B. Subject: Happy Hour OK, we are going to have a happy hour Thursday October 25th at Little Woodrow's downtown 5pm. Since Mr. Barker has decided to leave the nest we need to go drink a few (or in Bob's case, several) in his honor. I don't want this to turn into a sad scene, with everybody crying and begging Jim not to go............ let's just enjoy the nice weather on the deck and nobody should feel bad letting Jim pick up the tab (he is going to be making Dynegy money now). On a side note, I talked with the manager of Little Woodrow's and he mentioned something about noise ordinance and not being allowed to play accordians anymore???? Please pass this on to anybody else that I left off the distribution. Matt
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Todd Esay called and still wants to book out some power deals. I refered him to Ed Sacks. BUT, I want to hold off on the book outs and tell him we'll do them if they agree to a credit ring (will bring in cash) on the gas side. Bill would need to call Sempra credit to verify our total exposure. Can we talk to them about this???? Please let Bill know. geof
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
---------------------- Forwarded by Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron on 05/17/2001 08:13 AM --------------------------- [email protected] on 05/16/2001 04:09:38 PM To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] cc: Subject: GISB Ratification Ballot Dear GISB Members, Please find the attached ballot to record your vote on the ratification of the set of recommended modifications to GISB standards adopted by the Executive Committee (EC) in March and May, 2001. To record your vote, please fill out page two of this communication and either email ([email protected]) or fax it (713-356-0067) to our office by June 11. The EC voting record and discussion for each of these new standards, modifications to existing standards, interpretations or deletions of standards is contained within the EC minutes beginning on November 16, 2000 and carrying through to the EC meeting held on May 8, 2001. The EC minutes can be found on the GISB home page (www.gisb.org), as can the requests, recommendations, and related subcommittee and task force minutes. Transcripts of the EC meetings where these recommendations were discussed can be ordered by calling the GISB office - 713-356-0060. A separate email will be sent to you containing a summary of the recommendations and the recommendations themselves. The recommendations are also posted on the GISB web site. Please feel free to call the GISB office if you have any difficulty retrieving any of this information. Best Regards, GISB Office The GISB organization follows a privacy policy, which does not permit distribution of contact information. As such, all email addresses are denoted blind in correspondence. Upon receipt of notice, the GISB office will modify the distribution to no longer carry your address. If you would like to add other participants from your organization to this distribution list, please also email such request to the GISB office. - bt010515.PDF
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Per my voice mail, will you please take a quick look at my edits to Vlady's draft risk management policy attached below. I don't think any of them are problematic, but Vlady has some concerns mainly because the base Enron Corp. risk management policy was used as the template and therefore I am effectively making edits to it. I will be leaving the office today around 11:00 so I want to turn this to Peoples before then if possible. On any other business, I will be unavailable from 1:30 to probably 3:00 today, but can be reached via pager 800-980-1771 or cell phone 312-925-8888 at any other time. As always - thanks for your help. Gregg ---------------------- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 06/13/2000 07:45 AM --------------------------- To: Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Revised RM Policy Some comments on your comments: Section II: I don't like the title "Commercial Development Manager" but rather "Risk Manager" Response: The title Commercial Development Manager comes from the MEH Operating Agreement. We can amend the LLC Agreement if necessary, but it seems burdensome since the title is only a formality. However, as currently written, the Commercial Development Manager is the person responsible for managing the daily business, i.e. similar to a desk director. In order to maintain control of this position, it can only be filled by an Enron nominee and will report directly to the MEH General Manager, Laura Luce of Enron. Section VII: Majority of the wording came initially from attorneys, I would recommend confirming that. Response: I will run this by the attorneys. However, from a technical perspective, Section VII refers to employees of MEH. No one in the Chicago office is an employee of MEH, but rather we all remained employees of our respective organizations. I will ask the attorneys if we need to limit all Chicago based employees, both of Enron North America and Peoples Energy Resources. Section VIII: Who is the General Manager of MEH? Response: As mentioned above, Laura Luce, Vice President of Enron North America Is Enron North America Corp. a legal entity? Response: Yes, Enron North America Corp. replaced Enron Capital Trade and Resources as the Wholesale business of Enron Corp. Unless you know something different, I believe that to be a true statement. Let me know if any of my responses don't make sense or you still have any questions. I am still going to try to get this out by 10:00 or so. Gregg To: Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Revised RM Policy Policy Comments: Section II: I don't like the title "Commercial Development Manager" but rather "Risk Manager" Section VII: Majority of the wording came initially from attorneys, I would recommend confirming that. Section VIII: Who is the General Manager of MEH? Is Enron North America Corp. a legal entity? Vlady. From: Gregg Penman @ ENRON 06/12/2000 02:03 PM To: Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Revised RM Policy Vlady - As we discussed, I am attaching my revisions to your initial draft. They are mainly cosmetic attempts to make the RM Policy terms consistent with the MEH Operating Agreement and separate MEH from any behind the scenes reporting or controls that ENA chooses to place on Richard/MEH. Let me know if you have any concerns about my edits. I would like to send this to Peoples end of day today. I will follow up with Structuring to find a body to model the underlying asset position. Thanks - Gregg
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I have a follow up appointment with Dr. Roman next Monday. I also made an appt with a gyn for later in December (1st available date). Make you think of making any calls? Love, Kay
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Part 2 Scouting Houston The Longhorns should be able to get back on the winning track Saturday night when they host Houston at 6 p.m. in a game that will be a regional Fox telecast. The Cougars won their first game of the season Saturday, defeating Army, 31-30. Army had a chence to win with a 32-yard field goal on the final play of the game, but UH defensive back Emile White blocked it. Houston had lost its first two games, 30-27, to Rice in overtime, and 28-13 to LSU. New Cougar coach Dana Dimel has installed an all-out passing offense and his QB, senior Jason McKinley, is fifth in the nation in total offense with 333.3 yards per game. The Cougars are sixth in passing with 346.3 yards per game, and WR Brian Robinson is among the national leaders with 31 catches for 299 yards. The Cougars gained 524 yards against Army and ran 92 plays. Defensively, Houston has struggled. In losing to Stanford last week, the Longhorns lost all three of the "keys to victory" I cited in my scouting report. They lost the rushing battle, they didn't put as much pressure on the Stanford QBs as the Cardinal defenders put on the Texas signal callers, and they had two turnovers, while Stanford had none. The Cougars are far less formidable than Stanford, so Texas should win fairly easily. Here are three keys to victory, in my opinion: 1. Do a better job of running the football. That's not a huge order since the Horns are averaging only 50 yards per game on the ground. 2. Protect the Texas quarterbacks. Stanford got five sacks and had tremendous pressure on the Texas QBs most of the game. 3. Put a lot of pressure on McKinley. The Texas secondary gives up a lot of big plays when opposing QBs have time to throw. Long-Range Outlook Coach Mack Brown likes to talk about four or five "key games" on the schedule. He doesn't mean the other games are against patsies, but let's take a look at the teams Texas plays this year. First, there are six games the Longhorns should win. The opening victory over Louisiana-Lafayette was one of those. The others are Houston, Oklahoma State, Missouri, Baylor and Kansas. If Texas takes care of business in those six games, the other five will be the key to going 10-1 or 6-5 or somewhere in between this season. Stanford, as Brown noted, was one of the key games, so Texas is 0-1 in the big games. The others are Oklahoma, Colorado, Texas Tech and Texas A&M. Texas needs to win at least three of those to have a chance to finish 9-2 and win the Big 12's Southern Division title. Big 12 Roundup Texas lost at Stanford and Colorado fell to visiting Washington in the Big 12 Conference's top intersectional games Saturday, but Iowa State's Cyclones did gain a measure of respect by whipping state rival Iowa. This week's schedule is the last week before Big 12 play kicks off on Sept. 30. BIG 12 STANDINGS SOUTHERN DIVISION Conference Season W L PF PA Pct. W L PF PA Pct. Texas Tech 0 0 000 000 .000 4 0 101 26 1.000 Oklahoma 0 0 000 000 .000 2 0 100 21 1.000 Oklahoma State 0 0 000 000 .000 2 0 59 26 1.000 Texas A&M 0 0 000 000 .000 2 1 106 44 .667 Texas 0 0 000 000 .000 1 1 76 37 .500 Baylor 0 0 000 000 .000 1 1 29 41 .500 NORTHERN DIVISION Conference Season W L PF PA Pct. W L PF PA Pct. Kansas State 0 0 000 000 .000 3 0 157 17 1.000 Iowa State 0 0 000 000 .000 3 0 86 51 1.000 Nebraska 0 0 000 000 .000 2 0 76 37 1.000 Kansas 0 0 000 000 .000 1 1 40 51 .500 Missouri 0 0 000 000 .000 1 2 69 95 .333 Colorado 0 0 000 000 .000 0 3 52 62 .000 Last Week's Results Stanford 27, Texas 24 Texas A&M 45, UTEP 17 Texas Tech 26, Louisiana-Lafayette 0 Oklahoma State 23, Southwest Texas 0 Minnesota 34, Baylor 9 Washington 17, Colorado 14 Iowa State 24, Iowa 14 Kansas State 76, Ball State 0 Michigan State 13, Missouri 10 Kansas 23, Alabama-Birmingham 20 This Week's Games Houston at Texas 6 p.m. (Fox TV) Rice at Oklahoma South Florida at Baylor Southern Mississippi at Oklahoma State North Texas at Kansas State Iowa at Nebraska Southern Illinois at Kansas 2000 Longhorn Schedule, Re cord (1-1) Texas Opp. Sept. 9 Louisiana-Lafayette 52 10 Sept 16 at Stanford 24 27 Sept 23 Houston Sept 18 Rice Sept 30 Oklahoma State Oct. 7 Oklahoma (Dallas) Oct. 14 at Colorado Oct. 21 Missouri Oct. 28 Baylor Nov. 4 at Texas Tech Nov. 11 at Kansas Nov. 24 Texas A&M Scoring by Quarters Texas 2 38 21 15 - 76 Opponents 16 7 7 7 - 37 Recruiting Roundup The Longhorns picked up two more commitments last week, getting LB Lance McFarland, 6-1, 225, 4.6, of Jefferson early in the week, followed by a pledge from his teammate, RB Anthony Johnson, 5-11, 195, 4.4, on Friday. Johnson rushed for more than 200 yards in a loss to defending Class 3A chamion Texarkana Libery-Eylau earlier this season. He has great power, outstanding moves and tremendous speed. In other words, he has all the attributes of an outstanding running back. He also has confidence. The Longhorns already have a commitment from super Midland Lee RB Cedric Benson, but Johnson says that doesn't worry him. "I want to play on a great college team," he said. You're going to have competition wherever you go if you want to play for a winning program." His coach, Jerry Bennett, is the brother of Kansas State's defensive coordinator, and Johnson said the Wildcats finished No. 2 on his list. The Wildcats also were after McFarland, a hard-nosed tackle with good speed for a linebacker. He won a "fat-boy" 100 event after his sophomore year with an 11.3 clocking. Only players who weighed more than 200 pounds competed. The two additions give the Longhorns 15 early commitments. It looks more and more like the Texas coaches will award close to 25 scholarships because they still hope to add four of five defensive linemen, a quarterback, a tight end, a wide receiver, a linebacker, a safety and at least one cornerback. Seven of the Longhorns' 15 commitments are offensive linemen. Texas has signed only three offensive linemen in each of coach Mack Brown's three previous recruiting classes and he said heading into this recruiting season that the offensive line was the No. 1 priority. But he also said the defensive line was a high priority, and that is where most of the remaining scholarships probably will be awarded. Here's a list of the Horns' early commitments: Offensive Line (7) Jonathan Scott, 6-7, 290, 4.9, Dallas Carter, a national top 25 player. Abe Robinson, 6-6, 270, 4.9, Jersey Village, a national top 100 player. Alfio Randall, 6-6, 300, 5.1, Blinn JC, was a national top 100 player two years ago. Mike Garcia, 6-5, 280, 5.2, Galena Park, was the Aggies' top early pledge before switching to UT. Will Allen, 6-5, 300, 5.2, Cypress Falls, is in his three year as a starter. Roman Reeves, 6-6, 295, 5.2, another of the state's top eight offensive linemen. Terrance Young, 6-6, 340, 5.5, Longview, is tremendously strong and had offers from several top schools before committing to Texas. Running Back (2) Cedric Benson, 5-11, 200, 4.5, Midland Lee, the greatest Class 5A rusher and scorer in state history and a national top 25 player. Anthony Johnson, 5-11, 195, 4.4, Jefferson, No. 19 on my top 25 list. Linebacker (2) Yamil LeBron, 6-2, 240, 4.7, Killeen Ellison, was the middle backer the Longhorns targeted early. Lance McFarland, 6-1, 225, 4.6, Jefferson, No. 23 on my top 25 list. Defensive Back (4) Cedric Griffin, 6-1, 180, 4.42, San Antonio Holmes, one of the state's top two cornerbacks. Kendal Briles, 5-10, 175, 4.5, Wolfforth Frenship, a great option QB who will play safety at Texas. Braden Johnson, 6-2, 200, 4.5, Euless Trinity, a fine athlete who is playing QB this season. Brian Carter, 5-11, 180, 4.5, The Woodlands, a two-way star at WR and CB. RECRUITING NOTES: Super FB James Buchanon of Sarasota, Fla., plans to take his official visit to Texas this weekend. . . DL Kaelen Jakes of Valencia HS in Placentia, Cal., says he will visit this weekend or the following weekend. Jakes is playing nose guard this year and said he had two sacks and several other tackles for losses in Valencia's opening 24-0 victory over Palmdale Highland. He said Highland is supposed to have a playoff-caliber team "and we really shut them down." Jakes lived in Plano when he was in junior high and he said he is strongly considering coming to UT. "I really like the way football is king in Texas," he said. . . Super DT Tommie Harris of Killeen Ellison and outstanding OL William Winston of Houston Madison both say they plan to come to the Houston game this weekend on unofficial visits. Harris is the nation's top DT prospect, and Winston is a dominating OL. . . UT pledge Braden Johnson of Euless Trinity rallied his team from a 14-3 third-quarter deficit to a 17-14 victory over Arlington Martin by running 58 and 1 yards for TDs. . . DE Eric Hall of Clarksville, Tenn., took his official visit to Texas the Sept. 9 weekend and said he really enjoyed it. He said Texas is his favorite right now, but said he wants to take some other visits before committing to anyone. Hall was born in Fort Hood and, like Jakes, says he has fond memories of Texas football. Satchell, Richardson Status Two Longhorn freshmen football players, linebacker Aurmon Satchell and RB Tyrone Richardson, have been lost to the team for at least this semester. Satchell and Richardson both said they have some academic issues that need to be resolved before they can return. Both said they hope to be back in January. Satchell is from Denver Jefferson and Richardson is from Clarksville. True Orange Observations Coach Mack Brown is in his third year of what should have been a major rebuilding job at Texas. Thanks to the way he and his assistants took charge and changed one of the nation's worst defenses into one of its best, and thanks to the way they recruit, the Longhorns are already back among the nation's elite. I know they lost at Stanford. I didn't like it. The coaches and players didn't like it either. It bothers them even more than it bothers us. But Texas hasn't finished among the nation's top 10 in football since 1983, so we probably all expected too much from this team. The Horns will finish in the top 10 again very soon and probably next year if not this one. With three great recruiting classes already in school and a fourth in the making, there are going to be a lot more W's than L's in the weeks and years ahead. Let's be grateful for what he and his assistants and players have accomplished and help them get back on the winning track. Gustafson's Lawsuit Dismissed State District Judge J. Scott McCown ruled last week that former Longhorn baseball coach Cliff Gustafson's lawsuit against UT athletic director DeLoss Dodds has no merit and he dismissed it. McCown also said Dodds has official immunity from such a lawsuit. The lawsuit alleged that Dodds falsified an outside income statement by Gustafson and provided false information to then-UT president Robert Berdahl that Gustfson has violated university rules by maintaining a non-university bank account for a baseball camp. The suit alleged Dodds' actions forced him to resign. The judge ordered Gustafson to pay Dodds' court costs. Basketball Recruiting T. J. Ford, the outstanding point guard at Fort Bend Willowridge, says he had a great visit to Texas the Sept. 9 weekend, but isn't ready to commit to anyone until he looks at some other schools. UCLA probably is the Horns' main competition for Ford, a super quick 5-11 star who is the state's No. prospect. He led Willowridge to the state Class 5A title and a 36-1 record last season. Coach Rick Barnes only has one more scholarship to award, so UT's recruiting will be over for this year if Ford commits to the Longhorns. The Longhorn women are going to get a visit late this month from Kala Bowers, a 6-2 forward from Woodward, Okla. She is a national top 25 star who plays on a team that has lost only two games in the last two years. Coach Jody Conradt already has a pledge from the state's top prospect, 6-2 forward Heather Schreiber of Windthorst. Kelly to Miss Fall Semester Senior guard Darren Kelly will miss the fall semester, Longhorn basketball coach Rick Barnes announced last week. Kelly hopes to return to game action for the Longhorns following the fall semester. "It is going to be difficult not being able to play this fall, but I have some academic issues that I need to take care of to return to the team," Kelly said. "I am going to attempt to take care of that this fall and hope to rejoin the team in December." Kelly was slated to return for his second season as the team's starting shooting guard. He earned Big 12 Conference All-Newcomer and All-Bench team recognition as a junior, averaging 10 points and 3.1 rebounds per game. He was third on the squad in scoring and second in assists (81) last season. He also was the top three-point shooter on the team and second-best in the Big 12 (.452), including a .500 mark in league play (25-of-50). "I'm sad for Darren because he had made such great strides in his game during the latter part of last year and over the summer, and he had really taken a strong leadership role on this team," Barnes said. "With the addition of so many new guys this year, there's no question that his loss in the fall will hurt us. Hopefully he'll be able to return to the team and give us a big lift heading into Big 12 Conference play." A True Orange Subscription Is The Gift You Can Get Every Year for Your Longhorn Friends A subscription to True Orange is the perfect gift for any occasion for a Longh orn who has everything else. It's only $45 ($35 by e-mail) and I'll send an attractive card announcing your thoughtful gift. The only thing better is a gift of True Orange and the True Orange Fax ) and you can give both for just $130 a year ($99 if they take both by e-mail). o I am enclosing $45 for a gift subscription ($35 e-mail) o I am enclosing $130 for a gift subscription to the newsletter and the fax ($99 e-mail) Name of Recipient Address (& fax no., if applicable) City, State, Zip Your Name Any Message You Want on Card Next Issue September 25 The next issue will be e-mailed on September 25 and will report on the Houston game and preview the Big 12 Conference opener with Oklahoma State September 30 in Austin. It will also have lots of football recruiting news, a report on the team's progress, comments from the coaches and players and reports on other Longhorn athletic teams. Tell Your Friends About True Orange If you like True Orange, be sure and tell your Longhorn friends about it. I can always use more subscribers. The more subscribers I have, the more resources I have to call recruits and coaches and do all the other things that give you an inside view of Longhorn sports. I want to subscribe. I am enclosing $45 for the next year, which will include 26 issues. A two-year subscription is $85. For a one-year subscription via E-Mail, send $35. Name Street Address or Box Number or E-Mail Address City, State and Zip Code Remit to True Orange, P O Box 26530, Austin, TX 78755 Foreign Rates Available on Request. Phone 512-795-8536 E-Mail Address: [email protected] I want to give a gift subscription to True Orange. I am enclosing $45. Please send an appropriate gift card. For a gift subscription via E-Mail, send $35. Name of Person Receiving Gift Street Address or Box Number or E-Mail Address City, State and Zip Code Your Name
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
JAMES: Thank you very much for your comments. I would like to take the following actions in regard to this information: I would like to schedule a meeting with you and one or both of Todd Peterson and Tony Galt as soon as conveniently possible Monday, February 26 to discuss these and related issues. I will ask Kathleen to schedule the meeting. I would like you to take the lead in following up on a number of matters with Southern LNG (SLNG) and El Paso Merchant Energy (EPME). I think you should do this verbally, with follow-up written confirmation. Please ensure that we direct all correspondence to the proper corporate entities. For example, FERC compliance matters should be addressed to El Paso Merchant Energy, with a copy to Southern LNG. Correspondence directed to Southern LNG would have to deal with matters related to the Quality Letter Agreement or be in answering requests they direct to us. I would like you to keep both Eric Groves and Rod Hayslett up to date on all cost related matters, so that the cost of service model being developed by Rod Hayslett and being incorporated into Eric Groves economics model is as accurate as possible. When Rod transfers his COS model to Eric, we should be able to reduce our communications with Rod to an "as-required" basis. You have made some excellent points in your note, and I believe we need to follow up on several of them, i.e. spare parts - we have used the information supplied by Southern LNG, with the exception of the stripping facilities. I think you are right. I think we should include your estimates in the COS model. However, I would not raise this with EPME/SLNG - we can discuss it at the time of the True-Up filing by SLNG. O& M costs - in April 2000, SLNG did add to their fixed O&M costs, but not their variable ones. I think the information supplied by SLNG in late 2000 does pick up increased O&M costs (in the fixed portion of the COS) and increased power costs. I believe they have deliberately held the variable O&M costs at the same level as in April 2000 (by putting the increase in fixed O&M). I think you should formalize a request to EPME. copy to SLNG, around dredging maintenance costs, broken out by category (i.e. berth, channel, proposed new turning basin, old turning basin, etc.) I cannot find the $2,750,000 figure in your fifth point. I have never tried to estimate maintenance dredging costs. Your sixth point is one I had not even thought about - and you are right. I forgot about the tug pilots. I would like you to raise this issue with EPME, copy to SLNG. If the pilots are on board 24 hours per day, 365 days per year (to escort 30 to 40 vessels past the dock each day, then I believe your cost estimate is too low. We definitely need to include the EPME liquids stripping model economics in the COS model as one key alternative to handle high Btu content LNG. Therefore, we need to ensure we obtain an as-accurate-as-possible assessment of all the costs. The model will have the capability to handle several alternatives in this regard. I would also like to discuss the following matters at the Monday meeting: status of the British Gas marine study in general; status of our initial views on Phase I of the British Gas marine study; plans to deal with early release of study results to SLNG; understanding of the marine consultant's conclusions around the two-tug-escort possibility (e.g. where would the tugs be located? Would they tie onto the vessels?); other ramifications of the "escort" proposal (liability, risk, insurance, owners' reaction, FERC-imposed-requirement versus USCG); USCG preliminary report; Enron initiatives with the USCG, tug owners, pilots, etc. everywhere on the ship side of the unloading flange; and other (as may be brought forward). Until Monday! Les James McMillan 02/25/2001 10:50 AM To: Les Webber/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Subject: Re: ELBA ISLAND LNG TERMINAL - Cost of Service Les, I have the following comments on your attached Cost of Service Model: Assume that AFUDC is essentially "Interest during Construction," at a rate of 10%. Suspect that $9,739,130 Stabilization (Air or N2) Cost provided by Southern LNG on April 3, 2000 does not include spare parts, which would increase parts by about 2%, i.e. $195,000. This system would also increase O&M Costs: Fixed Cost - 0 (assume no increase in staff); Variable O&M - $100,000 (Swag for Maintenance Cost); Electric Power by $530,000 per year (6000 hp operating 1/3 of time) Question to SLNG, does their $2,450,000/hr Variable O&M include maintenance dredging of the Dock & Turning Basin? August 2000 - same comment on spare parts as item 2 above, increase Spares by 2% times incremental capital cost: $300000/yr for 3.8% Air and $440,000 for N2 injection FERC Environmental SWAGs for Capital Cost look OK. Assume your $2,750,000 Fixed O&M Cost is for Maintenance Dredging; camera maintenance will be negligible Spare parts would only apply to camera surveillance, which is negligible. Stand by Tugs cost does not include standby tug pilots. Add another $200,000 (SWAG) per year for them. Stripping Alternative - shouldn't we be using El Paso Energy's latest proposal here? i.e. the $34.5 MM proposal (Scaled up to $54 MM for contingency, owner's cost and interest during construction, plus another $0.5 to $5.0 for export facilities) with another $2.4 MM/hr for O&M? Regards James Les Webber 02/19/2001 05:42 PM To: Rod Hayslett@ENRON, Eric Groves@ECT, Lisa Yoho@Enron, James McMillan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Subject: ELBA ISLAND LNG TERMINAL - Cost of Service Greetings: I am attaching my Excel spreadsheet that takes you through the various iterations of the capital expenses and cost-of-service calculations for the Elba Island LNG Terminal. I have included certain "estimate" information that reflects my attempt to derive cost-of-service information to augment what Southern LNG has provided. Rod Hayslett has kindly agreed to develop the proper algorithm to more accurately calculate this information and to work with Eric Groves on integrating this as a module in Eric's LNG economic evaluation model for the Atlantic Basin. I believe we will need this in order to analyze the proposals that we expect to receive from El Paso Merchant Energy this week. I would also like James McMillan to take a look at the commodity charges and electric power rates for the nitrogen injection, air injection and gas liquids stripping cases, as well as at the fixed O&M costs. Some updating of the "estimate" information is likely needed. I will send copies of the relevant background information received from Southern LNG to each of you. In addition, I will be sending out a general memo to a wider audience with the attached spreadsheet. Regards. Les Webber <Embedded StdOleLink>
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
J-We bought 15,000/d from a 3rd party for 11/10 through 11/14. Please pull from our TCO Pool #69593. Our daily forcasted noms will reflect this. C- Should we do this at GD 10-14 rather than IF FOM?
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
-----Original Message----- From: Matt Motley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 3:22 PM To: Dina McGuinn Subject: wanna buy a house?
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I had arranged for this process to move along in Europe in parallel with Joel's instruction of AA in Houston. Do you foresee any issues here ? Mike ---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Jordan/LON/ECT on 03/10/2000 17:13 --------------------------- Doug Imrie 03/10/2000 15:22 To: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT cc: Oliver Gaylard/LON/ECT@ECT, Hugo Moreira/LON/ECT@ECT, Simon Sear/EU/Enron@Enron Subject: Risk TRAC Clarification Just to clarify, I believed you would like me to document the process of the feeds from the deal capture and valuation systems (Power 99 etc.) into the Risk TRAC database which flows through to CAS. David Hardy was not in the meeting today, but Oliver Gaylard made a good point that Simon Sear (ie the Strategic Initiatives) Group may be doing this, do you want me to continue with this? Kind regards D
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Can we meet at 5:00 today?
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Listed below are several positions which may become available over the next several months in the Portland office. We will be holding information sessions on Friday, 3/23 in Mt Hood. Listed below are details regarding the time of the information session, position, department and hiring manager. Time Position Department Hiring Manager 10:00 Senior Specialist Fundamentals Analysis Tim Heizenrader 10:30 Specialist/Analyst Real Time Bill Williams III 11:00 Specialist/Senior Specialist Volume Management Chris Stokley 12:00 Research Analyst Renewable Power Desk Elliot Mainzer 2:30 Power Prescheduler Scheduling Cara Semperger Please feel free to attend any of these sessions to learn more about the available opportunities. Attached are more detailed descriptions of the above mentioned positions. We will be considering internal candidates as well as external candidates for the above positions. If you are interested, please let Amy FitzPatrick know no later than close of business Wednesday, March 28, 2001.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Stinson, Any resolution on this one? Vince ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001 07:48 AM --------------------------- ARSystem <[email protected]> on 01/30/2001 07:17:35 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> cc: Subject: Approval is Overdue: Access Request for [email protected] This request has been pending approval for 2 days and you are the alternate. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000015793&Page= Approval to review and act upon this request. Request ID : 000000000015793 Approver : [email protected] Request Create Date : 1/29/01 9:48:41 AM Requested For : [email protected] Resource Name : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read] Resource Type : Directory
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Robin Lorentzen 14250 Chicken Dinner Road Caldwell, ID 83607-9326 [email protected] To Mr. Ken Lay, I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills. Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees. Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out. And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year. As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt. The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it. Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings. Sincerely, Robin Lorentzen
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Just to give you an update, I reeived an e-mail from Dr. Carl Harris, who is currently in charge of my application in the admission's office. He wants me to answer a few questions to make sure I can handle the coursework. That is why I wanted to meet with you and Professors' Titman and Brown, to discuss the coursework and to talk to you about my strengths and weaknesses. I know that with my financial modeling and accounting skills, energy-finance background, and the Business' School's team-oriented approach to learning, that I will excel in this type of learning environment. I hope things work out and thanks again for your help. Ben
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
That is too much work!!! However, my leg is feeling better, thank you. How is your day going? I am @ the office. It is good to get out of the house. Have a nice day. Love you-Dad ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 9:38 AM Subject: NOVA's Virtual Enigma > web_browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT) > > Greetings from NOVA Online. > > A friend of yours has encrypted a message using NOVA's Virtual Enigma. The message, displayed below, is for your eyes only. > > To decipher the message, you will need to access the Virtual Enigma (requires the Shockwave plugin), which is located on NOVA's Web site. You will also need a special 'key' to decode the message. > > You will find the Virtual Enigma at the following url: > http://www.pbs.org/nova/decoding/virtwave.html > > Message sent by: > eric ([email protected]) > > AAA > > Encrypted message: > > QTDHF AYTPE KHYYN WSJYE TBXNQ PJRRH GDVDX QHNNK QBKOD ZVQEU LTRMQ WDHUR ACFGZ VJDPV UFIZA M > > NOVA Online > http://www.pbs.org/nova > >
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
current 4570 minn -8 1/2 oakland -9 tease minn-2 1/2 over 43 1/2 all 200
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I will not be able to attend this meeting. Geynille Dillingham 08/18/2000 02:57 PM To: Jere C Overdyke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greek Rice/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Randal Maffett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Coats/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Amanda K Martin/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Stephen Schwarz, Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Homer Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Pizzolato/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa White/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Andrea Price/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michelle LeBlanc/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Benjamin Markey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hang Bui/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shanna Husser/HOU/EES@EES, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Donna Baker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Hutton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Beth A Ryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON Subject: LSU TEAM MEETING Hello LSU Recruiting Team, You have been chosen to represent and assist in the Fall 2000 recruiting efforts at Louisiana State University for Enron's Associate/Analyst Program. We are excited about the upcoming association,and welcome you to the team. We have arranged a lunch meeting to discuss the details. Please read the following attachment for information concerning the meeting time and place. If you will not be able to attend, please r.s.v.p your regrets. See you soon! Recruiter, Geynille Dillingham Coordinator, Debbie Flores
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I'll check into it for you, thanks for the heads up.....
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Hi Reggie: Conference Room EB 19C2 is in need of a round black table to hold the telephone. Is there one available? Also we would like a two-drawer lateral file cabinet for EB 19C2. Co. # 0011, RC# 100038. Thanks and have a great day! Shirley 3-5290
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Attached is a summary of the key issues on El Paso which we will be discussing tomorrow at our meeting. Our comments to the FERC are due on October 14 so we will be providing Leslie with more feedback for inclusion.---Original Message----- From: Rangel, Ina Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:29 AM To: Tholt, Jane M. Subject: El Paso
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Start Date: 3/5/01; HourAhead hour: 16; No ancillary schedules awarded. No variances detected. LOG MESSAGES: PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001030516.txt
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Good morning everyone: Several of us were talking and in order to help us get into the "Holiday Spirit" we thought it would be nice if each of us brought an appetizer, dessert, chips, popcorn, etc. or anything you desire, next Monday, the 18th. We will put everything out in one of the conference rooms and celebrate ALL DAY! Never mind about the calories - this is a once-a-year thing! This is not mandatory - just if you want to and if you remember! Also, don't forget the "Holiday Party" at Damians on Tuesday night 5:30 - 7:30 PM. Have a great day! Shirley
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Edith, - Substation location: Sayerville - Gas: Transco Zone 6 (no additional cost for LDC) - Unit contingent call - 97% availability: It should be OK since we can assume 97% during summer time and 90~93% during non-summer time, for example. Could you get the pricing for following scenario based on above assumption? Flat and annual capacity payment for 3 and 5 year With 16 hour block and 4 hour block Please call me, if it doesn't make sense. Jinsung (Ext: 37330)
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Clem: the Bear lawyer is Sharon Chernick phone: 212/272-2557 fax: 212/272-2727 email: schernick @bear.com Sara Shackleton Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a Houston, Texas 77002 713-853-5620 (phone) 713-646-3490 (fax) [email protected]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Meet the head of the leading firm in our business Imagine the opportunity! Imagine that the leading energy company in the world has picked you to run the company that it expects to be the leading retail energy company in North America. So you get a sharp competitive edge in the back room, you recruit IBM as a co-owner assuring you the lowest cost per customer by a factor of two or three. To get your foot in 27 million doors you recruit AOL as a co-venturer with a commitment from AOL to promote NewPower,s wares. You do an IPO and take in about $700 million for working capital. The IPO is over and the quiet period it required. But the most important silver spoon -- so that you get your energy at the best price and to protect you against price spikes -- you get up front 30 Enron-trained risk managers and traders. Can you imagine having to recruit them? To make sure this team is run by the optimum chief they picked Eugene Lockhart, most recently president of Consumer Services at AT&T and before that president of BankAmerica,s Global Retail Bank with its consumer, commercial and small business banking services delivered through 3,000+ branches. Now, Lockhart's talking about his plans. Restructuring Today had lunch with Lockhart Thursday and reported in detail: * How NewPower intends to actually start up the retail industry? What is the heart of NewPower,s business plan? * How they'll make money in markets where margins may seem too thin. * How he,s going to have 600,000+ customers next month and easily a million by the end of 2001. * What percentage of their sales come from the NewPower website. What figure is he using for cost of customer acquisition? * Lockhart plans to have by the end of the first quarter or at the latest the second quarter 750,000 customers making them by far the largest unregulated retail marketer in the US. * How does he think utilities will compete with the NewPower paradigm? * What marketshare do they expect to get at first and then by 2005? * What does he see as his biggest challenge? * Why is this a good time for NewPower to invade California markets? * Why will NewPower succeed where Enron failed? * What,s the role of backward dating in forward market margins? * Where NewPower gives a 20-25% discount on the commodity portion of a bill, what kind of margin can it make now? * How do higher prices help NewPower? "We,re actually in a very good position given (that) the gas cost increases perversely will work in our favor ... " * "We have a 10-year, exclusive agreement with IBM whereby we can issue a bill, collect the money and care for a customer at lower cost than anyone else in the industry by several orders of magnitude." We,d love to send you the two-story, detailed report on how the leading company in our industry is going to get there and stay there. Reply to [email protected] and I'll rush you the two articles or call 1-800-486-8201. Subscribe today! Restructuring Today is the nations leading daily focused on the convergence of electricity, natural gas, telecom and dot-com -- chronicling the creation of America's largest industry. If you fax the completed attached order form to 1-202-298-8201, I'll make sure you don't miss a single vital issue. Cordially, Season Hawksley US Publishing 1-800-486-8201 [email protected] - orderform.pdf
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
-----Original Message----- From: Sweet, Twanda Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:31 PM To: Sanders, Richard B. Subject: FW: 10/3 Itinerary -----Original Message----- From: "Chen, Jane" <[email protected]>@ENRON Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:08 PM To: Sweet, Twanda Subject: 10/3 Itinerary Hi Twanda - Please see below for Mr. Sanders' itinerary from San Francisco to Portland. Let me know if changes are necessary. Thanks, jane Jane Chen Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, LLP Assistant to Gary Fergus & Kirstin Wolf SF ext. 2944 SF rm. 2917c DD (415) 979-2944 > -----Original Message----- > From: Dubrofsky, Dory > Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 5:30 PM > To: Chen, Jane > Subject: 3OCT itin for R.Sanders > > SANDERS/RICHARD*SF BAX > > > 03 OCT 01 - WEDNESDAY > UNITED 2264 FIRST CLASS > LV: SAN FRANCISCO 545P NONSTOP MILES- 550 CONFIRMED > AR: PORTLAND ORE 720P ELAPSED TIME- 1:35 > AUDIO SEAT- 1A > UNITED RECORD LOCATOR ** ZT607C ** ** > EQUIPMENT-BOEING 737 JET > > LIMO QUICKSILVER (800) 486-9622 > LIMO FROM-BPH SF - SPEAR ST SIDE > LIMO TO-SFO > PICK UP TIME-315P > DROP OFF TIME-350P > RATE:$AS QUOTED > LIMO CONFIRMED WITH-PHIL > CONFIRMATION-UNDER.FERGUS PTY3 > > COAST HOTELS LTD 02 NT/S - OUT 05OCT CONFIRMED > RIVERPLACE HOTEL A W 1 ROOM/S / 1 QUEEN GUARANTEE-CREDIT CARD > 1510 SW HARBORWAY PHONE-503 228 3233 RATE- 159.00 > PORTLAND OREGON 97201 FAX-503 295 6161 > > CONFIRMATION-WX610405 > 24HRS CANCEL NOTICE REQUIRED TO AVOID NO SHOW CHARGES > > FOR ASSISTANCE DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS 7A-530P PT > MON-FRI CALL - (415)442-1000 OR (800)756-7602 - > DAYTIME EMERGENCY TRAVEL CALL - (800)771-3405. > AFTER HOUR EMERGENCY TRAVEL/HOT LINE (877)201-8965 > YOUR BRANCH ACCESS CODE IS A-3LW-BROB. > TO ENSURE CREDIT TO YOUR FREQUENT FLYER ACCOUNT - > PLEASE PRESENT YOUR FREQUENT FLYER CARD AT CHECKIN. > AIRFARES ARE NEVER GUARANTEED UNTIL TICKET IS ISSUED > UNITED RECORD LOCATOR ** ZT607C ** ** > HAVE A GOOD TRIP * DORY > CAR RESERVATIONS NOT REQUIRED THRU AMERICAN EXPRESS. > ITINERARY CHANGES MAY RESULT IN A HIGHER AIRFARE. > ELECTRONIC TICKET RESERVATION > ** VALID GOVERNMENT ISSUED PHOTO ID REQUIRED AT CHECK IN ** > ** ALL TICKETS ARE NON-TRANSFERABLE ** > PLEASE ADVISE BROBECK TRAVEL DEPARTMENT OF ALL UNUSED > PAPER OR E-TICKETS FOR PROCESSING. > PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL SEAT ASSIGNMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO > RELEASE IF UNCLAIMED 20 MINUTES PRIOR TO DEPARTURE. > > AIR TRANSPORTATION 342.33 TAX 28.42 TTL 370.75 > ======================================================= This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to [email protected] BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP http://www.brobeck.com
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Gerald, please effect the change that Steve indicates he wants and forward the revised document to me for his execution in two executable originals, initialled off by yourself, when this is accomplished. Thanks!!. Steve HPL Schneider 05/22/2000 12:50 PM To: Candace L Bywaters/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Reimbursement Agreement between ENA and HPL I would structure the agreement as an absolute obligation by ENA to pay the full amount, as that is what they have committed. Our arrangement with Tejas is outside this agreement and should be handled separately. Make that change and let's execute. Call Janet Wallis to determine the ENA person to execute. ---------------------- Forwarded by Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2000 12:44 PM --------------------------- Candace L Bywaters 05/22/2000 08:09 AM To: Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Reimbursement Agreement between ENA and HPL Please review the enclosed document. I find it satisfactory, especially in light that it allows that "up to $44,780" will be reimbursed by ENA to HPL, since we're still awaiting word from Tejas as to whether or not they will participate. If this looks fine to you, please advise and I will have two originals presented to you for your execution. Who would you think would be the appropriate executor for ENA? Thanks! Eric Gillaspie 05/18/2000 02:32 PM To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Candace L Bywaters/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Reimbursement Agreement between ENA and HPL Gerald & Candy, Per your instructions the Draft Reimbursement Letter Agreement between HPL and ENA. Eric Gillaspie 713-345-7667 Enron Building 3886 Gerald Nemec 05/16/2000 05:39 PM To: Candace L Bywaters/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Reimbursement Agreement between ENA and HPL I will get something to you within the next couple of days. Should be a straightforward letter agreement. Eric, Let's discuss in the morning. Candace L Bywaters 05/16/2000 08:41 AM To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth W Kaase/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Reimbursement Agreement between ENA and HPL Please advise as to the status of the agreement I requested you draft for me. Specifically, I seek a reimbursement agreement with HPL as payee and ENA as payor whereby HPL will be kept whole on its costs to install the Lockhart meter for Southern Union. We are currently awaiting the final word from El Paso to determine if they elect to participate in this meter as is allowed them under the JV Agreement., so the reimbursement amount will either be HPL's full share of $44,000 or half of that amount, as you know from the Lockhart Agreement in which you participated. Please let me know where you are on this. Thanks, Gerald! Candy
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
please remove my email address from your distribution list. -----Original Message----- From: SaveBig <[email protected]>@ENRON Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:16 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Stay In Touch Over the Holidays with Free Nights and Weekends [IMAGE] << File: http://wireless.freeze.com/srbzipnew.htm >> [IMAGE] << File: http://wireless.freeze.com/srbzipnew.htm >> [IMAGE] << File: http://wireless.freeze.com/srbzipnew.htm >> << File: http://wireless.freeze.com/srbzipnew.htm >> Click Here to view more details about your FREE Nokia 3390 << File: http://wireless.freeze.com/srbzipnew.htm >> Phone Package Includes: -Free* Nokia 3390 -500 Minutes -Unlimited Weekend Minutes -Free Nationwide Long Distance -Free Nationwide Digital Roaming -AOL Instant Messenger (IM your friends from your new cell phone with AOL Instant Messenger loaded right on the phone!!!) Click Here to view more details about your FREE Nokia 3390 << File: http://wireless.freeze.com/srbzipnew.htm >> [IMAGE] << File: http://wireless.freeze.com/srbzipnew.htm >> * Phone free after rebates. Offer subject to credit approval or deposit, and is available to customers activating a new line of service on a one-year contract with VoiceStream Wireless. Not all US markets are served by VoiceStream Wireless. If you are in a non-VoiceStream Wireless area you will receive another great offer from another major wireless company. Other restrictions apply, see full offer for details. Offer Expires November 30, 2001.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Dinner changed to 6.45pm - 6.30pm is too early for them. Table for 4 booked under Vince's name. Regards, Anjam x35383 ---------------------- Forwarded by Anjam Ahmad/LON/ECT on 17/02/2000 17:55 --------------------------- Anjam Ahmad 14/02/2000 15:48 To: Steven Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT, Benjamin Parsons/LON/ECT@ECT cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Invitation to Sunday Dinner with Vince @ 6.30pm Hi Steve & Ben, We are planning an early Sunday dinner (one of the few evening slots that are free in Vince's schedule) at: Diverso Restaurant 85 Piccadilly London W1V 9HD Tel: 020 7491 2222 It's just a few yards to the left of Park Lane hotel on Park Lane, close to Hyde Park Corner underground and we've been there before. Vince would like to discuss the latest developments and it seems like the best opportunity to do so. Please let me know if you can make it and I can make sure the table is booked accordingly. Regards, Anjam x35383 P.S. Vince will be staying at the Park Lane Hotel, telephone number 0171 499 6321
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Lucy, Here is a final 12/01 rentroll for you to save. My only questions are: 1. Neil Moreno in #21-he paid $120 on 11/24, but did not pay anything on 12/01. Even if he wants to swich to bi-weekly, he needs to pay at the beginning of the two week period. What is going on? 2. Gilbert in #27-is he just late? Here is a file for 12/08.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
[IMAGE] You are receiving this message as a valued member of the itsImazing Network. This special offer message is powered by TargitInteractive, an ItsImazing affiliate partner. Forward to: [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] By subscribing to AT&T Wireless service for $39.99 per month, you agree to a 1-year service agreement. $35.00 Activation Fee will appear on the first bill. Roaming charges of $0.60 per minute apply only when outside your AT&T Wireless home calling area. Early termination will be subject to a $150 one-time charge. All orders are subject to AT&T credit approval. AT&T Wireless service not available in all areas. Caller ID service may not be available in some areas. Offer available only for new subscribers to AT&T Cellular Service. You must be 18 years of age or older to apply. Buyer's remorse period is 30 days from activation and customer is required to return the unit with all packaging at their cost. $40.00 AT&T Service Credit will appear on your bill once the mail-in coupon is received.Some restrictions may apply. [IMAGE] [IMAGE] If you would like to opt-out of TargitInteractive, please click here .
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
FYI ---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2000 12:19 PM --------------------------- hao peng <[email protected]> on 04/19/2000 11:52:53 AM To: Shirley Crenshaw <[email protected]> cc: Subject: Re: Telephone Interview with the Enron Corp. Research Group Dear Shirley: It is my pleasure to have the opportunity to interview with Enron. I will be available at 412-661-3393 at 4:30pm eastern time. Please let me know if there is any change about this sechedule. Thanks. Hao --On Wednesday, April 19, 2000, 11:29 AM -0500 Shirley Crenshaw <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello Hao: > > The Enron Corp. Research Group would like to interview you by telephone > tomorrow, Thursday, April 20, at 3:30 pm central standard time (4:30 > eastern time). > > Please let me know if this is satisfactory to you and what telephone > number they may reach you at. > > The interview will include the following members of the Research Group: > > Vince Kaminski Managing Director > Stinson Gibner Vice President > Vasant Shanbhogue Vice President > Zimin Lu Director > Tanya Tamarchenko Manager > > If you have any questions, please let me know > > Thanks you very much and look forward to hearing from you. > > Shirley Crenshaw > Administrative Coordinator > Enron Corp. Research > 713/853-5290 > email: [email protected] > > >
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }