section_id
string | query_id
string | passage
string | question
string | answers_spans
sequence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
history_1776 | d0d967d7-f45e-41d4-a5bf-89bb72fe18a8 | Home ownership in Sydney was less common than renting prior to the Second World War but this trend has since reversed. Median house prices have increased by an average of 8.6% per annum since 1970. The median house price in Sydney in March 2014 was $630,000. The primary cause for rising prices is the increasing cost of land which made up 32% of house prices in 1977 compared to 60% in 2002. 31.6% of dwellings in Sydney are rented, 30.4% are owned outright and 34.8% are owned with a mortgage. 11.8% of mortgagees in 2011 had monthly loan repayments of less than $1,000 and 82.9% had monthly repayments of $1,000 or more. 44.9% of renters for the same period had weekly rent of less than $350 whilst 51.7% had weekly rent of $350 or more. The median weekly rent in Sydney is $450. | Which houses do more people live in, rented, owned outright or owned with a mortgage? | {
"spans": [
"owned with a mortgage"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1776 | 7006376b-7aca-48ba-8289-586561f1cb1f | Home ownership in Sydney was less common than renting prior to the Second World War but this trend has since reversed. Median house prices have increased by an average of 8.6% per annum since 1970. The median house price in Sydney in March 2014 was $630,000. The primary cause for rising prices is the increasing cost of land which made up 32% of house prices in 1977 compared to 60% in 2002. 31.6% of dwellings in Sydney are rented, 30.4% are owned outright and 34.8% are owned with a mortgage. 11.8% of mortgagees in 2011 had monthly loan repayments of less than $1,000 and 82.9% had monthly repayments of $1,000 or more. 44.9% of renters for the same period had weekly rent of less than $350 whilst 51.7% had weekly rent of $350 or more. The median weekly rent in Sydney is $450. | Which mortgage payments were more common in 2011, less or more than $1,000? | {
"spans": [
"more"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1776 | 7d65c571-818b-4724-8091-4f2764def1ac | Home ownership in Sydney was less common than renting prior to the Second World War but this trend has since reversed. Median house prices have increased by an average of 8.6% per annum since 1970. The median house price in Sydney in March 2014 was $630,000. The primary cause for rising prices is the increasing cost of land which made up 32% of house prices in 1977 compared to 60% in 2002. 31.6% of dwellings in Sydney are rented, 30.4% are owned outright and 34.8% are owned with a mortgage. 11.8% of mortgagees in 2011 had monthly loan repayments of less than $1,000 and 82.9% had monthly repayments of $1,000 or more. 44.9% of renters for the same period had weekly rent of less than $350 whilst 51.7% had weekly rent of $350 or more. The median weekly rent in Sydney is $450. | Which homes with weekly rents were being rented more in 2011, less or more than $350 weekly rent? | {
"spans": [
"more"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1776 | d9eb54e2-6900-4056-bde3-a00c3b4503ff | Home ownership in Sydney was less common than renting prior to the Second World War but this trend has since reversed. Median house prices have increased by an average of 8.6% per annum since 1970. The median house price in Sydney in March 2014 was $630,000. The primary cause for rising prices is the increasing cost of land which made up 32% of house prices in 1977 compared to 60% in 2002. 31.6% of dwellings in Sydney are rented, 30.4% are owned outright and 34.8% are owned with a mortgage. 11.8% of mortgagees in 2011 had monthly loan repayments of less than $1,000 and 82.9% had monthly repayments of $1,000 or more. 44.9% of renters for the same period had weekly rent of less than $350 whilst 51.7% had weekly rent of $350 or more. The median weekly rent in Sydney is $450. | How many percent of dwellings in Sydney are either owned outright or owned with a mortgage? | {
"spans": [
"62"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1776 | 76b0d152-075e-437a-b693-085b6863185a | Home ownership in Sydney was less common than renting prior to the Second World War but this trend has since reversed. Median house prices have increased by an average of 8.6% per annum since 1970. The median house price in Sydney in March 2014 was $630,000. The primary cause for rising prices is the increasing cost of land which made up 32% of house prices in 1977 compared to 60% in 2002. 31.6% of dwellings in Sydney are rented, 30.4% are owned outright and 34.8% are owned with a mortgage. 11.8% of mortgagees in 2011 had monthly loan repayments of less than $1,000 and 82.9% had monthly repayments of $1,000 or more. 44.9% of renters for the same period had weekly rent of less than $350 whilst 51.7% had weekly rent of $350 or more. The median weekly rent in Sydney is $450. | What was more common in Sydney prior to the Second World War, renting a home or owning a home? | {
"spans": [
"renting"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1776 | a2b96f1e-a9a2-4c12-9e4a-0f1a6396ffce | Home ownership in Sydney was less common than renting prior to the Second World War but this trend has since reversed. Median house prices have increased by an average of 8.6% per annum since 1970. The median house price in Sydney in March 2014 was $630,000. The primary cause for rising prices is the increasing cost of land which made up 32% of house prices in 1977 compared to 60% in 2002. 31.6% of dwellings in Sydney are rented, 30.4% are owned outright and 34.8% are owned with a mortgage. 11.8% of mortgagees in 2011 had monthly loan repayments of less than $1,000 and 82.9% had monthly repayments of $1,000 or more. 44.9% of renters for the same period had weekly rent of less than $350 whilst 51.7% had weekly rent of $350 or more. The median weekly rent in Sydney is $450. | Since World War II, what has been more common in Sydney, renting or home ownership? | {
"spans": [
"home ownership"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1776 | aa44a987-a860-4a74-b55a-53414d67a25f | Home ownership in Sydney was less common than renting prior to the Second World War but this trend has since reversed. Median house prices have increased by an average of 8.6% per annum since 1970. The median house price in Sydney in March 2014 was $630,000. The primary cause for rising prices is the increasing cost of land which made up 32% of house prices in 1977 compared to 60% in 2002. 31.6% of dwellings in Sydney are rented, 30.4% are owned outright and 34.8% are owned with a mortgage. 11.8% of mortgagees in 2011 had monthly loan repayments of less than $1,000 and 82.9% had monthly repayments of $1,000 or more. 44.9% of renters for the same period had weekly rent of less than $350 whilst 51.7% had weekly rent of $350 or more. The median weekly rent in Sydney is $450. | What percentage of dwellings still have mortages? | {
"spans": [
"34.8%"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1776 | 57d5c987-eb61-489e-89ad-a3fa24e8db70 | Home ownership in Sydney was less common than renting prior to the Second World War but this trend has since reversed. Median house prices have increased by an average of 8.6% per annum since 1970. The median house price in Sydney in March 2014 was $630,000. The primary cause for rising prices is the increasing cost of land which made up 32% of house prices in 1977 compared to 60% in 2002. 31.6% of dwellings in Sydney are rented, 30.4% are owned outright and 34.8% are owned with a mortgage. 11.8% of mortgagees in 2011 had monthly loan repayments of less than $1,000 and 82.9% had monthly repayments of $1,000 or more. 44.9% of renters for the same period had weekly rent of less than $350 whilst 51.7% had weekly rent of $350 or more. The median weekly rent in Sydney is $450. | How many more percentage of dwellings in Sydney are rented than owned outright? | {
"spans": [
"1.2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1776 | 022a9051-a25e-4f83-bb63-d0250f14d1f9 | Home ownership in Sydney was less common than renting prior to the Second World War but this trend has since reversed. Median house prices have increased by an average of 8.6% per annum since 1970. The median house price in Sydney in March 2014 was $630,000. The primary cause for rising prices is the increasing cost of land which made up 32% of house prices in 1977 compared to 60% in 2002. 31.6% of dwellings in Sydney are rented, 30.4% are owned outright and 34.8% are owned with a mortgage. 11.8% of mortgagees in 2011 had monthly loan repayments of less than $1,000 and 82.9% had monthly repayments of $1,000 or more. 44.9% of renters for the same period had weekly rent of less than $350 whilst 51.7% had weekly rent of $350 or more. The median weekly rent in Sydney is $450. | How many more percentage was the rising house prices in 2002 than in 1977? | {
"spans": [
"28"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1776 | 40aa16b4-6cae-4d03-8619-b237e4476148 | Home ownership in Sydney was less common than renting prior to the Second World War but this trend has since reversed. Median house prices have increased by an average of 8.6% per annum since 1970. The median house price in Sydney in March 2014 was $630,000. The primary cause for rising prices is the increasing cost of land which made up 32% of house prices in 1977 compared to 60% in 2002. 31.6% of dwellings in Sydney are rented, 30.4% are owned outright and 34.8% are owned with a mortgage. 11.8% of mortgagees in 2011 had monthly loan repayments of less than $1,000 and 82.9% had monthly repayments of $1,000 or more. 44.9% of renters for the same period had weekly rent of less than $350 whilst 51.7% had weekly rent of $350 or more. The median weekly rent in Sydney is $450. | How many more percentage was rent more 350 than rent less than 350? | {
"spans": [
"6.8"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1776 | 09b3601c-4391-44c2-89de-5b381d9e7a8e | Home ownership in Sydney was less common than renting prior to the Second World War but this trend has since reversed. Median house prices have increased by an average of 8.6% per annum since 1970. The median house price in Sydney in March 2014 was $630,000. The primary cause for rising prices is the increasing cost of land which made up 32% of house prices in 1977 compared to 60% in 2002. 31.6% of dwellings in Sydney are rented, 30.4% are owned outright and 34.8% are owned with a mortgage. 11.8% of mortgagees in 2011 had monthly loan repayments of less than $1,000 and 82.9% had monthly repayments of $1,000 or more. 44.9% of renters for the same period had weekly rent of less than $350 whilst 51.7% had weekly rent of $350 or more. The median weekly rent in Sydney is $450. | How many more percentage of house prices rose from 1977 to 2002? | {
"spans": [
"28"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1776 | 12af3d84-dd44-44b1-9cfe-13f40ae6b975 | Home ownership in Sydney was less common than renting prior to the Second World War but this trend has since reversed. Median house prices have increased by an average of 8.6% per annum since 1970. The median house price in Sydney in March 2014 was $630,000. The primary cause for rising prices is the increasing cost of land which made up 32% of house prices in 1977 compared to 60% in 2002. 31.6% of dwellings in Sydney are rented, 30.4% are owned outright and 34.8% are owned with a mortgage. 11.8% of mortgagees in 2011 had monthly loan repayments of less than $1,000 and 82.9% had monthly repayments of $1,000 or more. 44.9% of renters for the same period had weekly rent of less than $350 whilst 51.7% had weekly rent of $350 or more. The median weekly rent in Sydney is $450. | How many more percentage of dwellings are owned with a mortgage than owned outright? | {
"spans": [
"4.4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1776 | ff2a1887-1250-4528-96ca-79335b5579d1 | Home ownership in Sydney was less common than renting prior to the Second World War but this trend has since reversed. Median house prices have increased by an average of 8.6% per annum since 1970. The median house price in Sydney in March 2014 was $630,000. The primary cause for rising prices is the increasing cost of land which made up 32% of house prices in 1977 compared to 60% in 2002. 31.6% of dwellings in Sydney are rented, 30.4% are owned outright and 34.8% are owned with a mortgage. 11.8% of mortgagees in 2011 had monthly loan repayments of less than $1,000 and 82.9% had monthly repayments of $1,000 or more. 44.9% of renters for the same period had weekly rent of less than $350 whilst 51.7% had weekly rent of $350 or more. The median weekly rent in Sydney is $450. | How many percent of the dwellings in Sydney are not rented? | {
"spans": [
"68.4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1776 | db4c74c6-3332-45c8-86dd-87adfcfd76a7 | Home ownership in Sydney was less common than renting prior to the Second World War but this trend has since reversed. Median house prices have increased by an average of 8.6% per annum since 1970. The median house price in Sydney in March 2014 was $630,000. The primary cause for rising prices is the increasing cost of land which made up 32% of house prices in 1977 compared to 60% in 2002. 31.6% of dwellings in Sydney are rented, 30.4% are owned outright and 34.8% are owned with a mortgage. 11.8% of mortgagees in 2011 had monthly loan repayments of less than $1,000 and 82.9% had monthly repayments of $1,000 or more. 44.9% of renters for the same period had weekly rent of less than $350 whilst 51.7% had weekly rent of $350 or more. The median weekly rent in Sydney is $450. | How many percent of the dwellings in Sydney are not owned outright? | {
"spans": [
"69.6"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1776 | da4f9eae-3232-4c51-9e7c-d30f1a3a54c7 | Home ownership in Sydney was less common than renting prior to the Second World War but this trend has since reversed. Median house prices have increased by an average of 8.6% per annum since 1970. The median house price in Sydney in March 2014 was $630,000. The primary cause for rising prices is the increasing cost of land which made up 32% of house prices in 1977 compared to 60% in 2002. 31.6% of dwellings in Sydney are rented, 30.4% are owned outright and 34.8% are owned with a mortgage. 11.8% of mortgagees in 2011 had monthly loan repayments of less than $1,000 and 82.9% had monthly repayments of $1,000 or more. 44.9% of renters for the same period had weekly rent of less than $350 whilst 51.7% had weekly rent of $350 or more. The median weekly rent in Sydney is $450. | How many percent of the dwellings in Sydney are not owned with a mortgage? | {
"spans": [
"65.2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1776 | 59b435a6-f253-4f4a-9992-01f856325faa | Home ownership in Sydney was less common than renting prior to the Second World War but this trend has since reversed. Median house prices have increased by an average of 8.6% per annum since 1970. The median house price in Sydney in March 2014 was $630,000. The primary cause for rising prices is the increasing cost of land which made up 32% of house prices in 1977 compared to 60% in 2002. 31.6% of dwellings in Sydney are rented, 30.4% are owned outright and 34.8% are owned with a mortgage. 11.8% of mortgagees in 2011 had monthly loan repayments of less than $1,000 and 82.9% had monthly repayments of $1,000 or more. 44.9% of renters for the same period had weekly rent of less than $350 whilst 51.7% had weekly rent of $350 or more. The median weekly rent in Sydney is $450. | How many more percent are owned with a mortgage than rented? | {
"spans": [
"3.2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1776 | 481b7d05-6fca-440d-b575-5c07cf07e56c | Home ownership in Sydney was less common than renting prior to the Second World War but this trend has since reversed. Median house prices have increased by an average of 8.6% per annum since 1970. The median house price in Sydney in March 2014 was $630,000. The primary cause for rising prices is the increasing cost of land which made up 32% of house prices in 1977 compared to 60% in 2002. 31.6% of dwellings in Sydney are rented, 30.4% are owned outright and 34.8% are owned with a mortgage. 11.8% of mortgagees in 2011 had monthly loan repayments of less than $1,000 and 82.9% had monthly repayments of $1,000 or more. 44.9% of renters for the same period had weekly rent of less than $350 whilst 51.7% had weekly rent of $350 or more. The median weekly rent in Sydney is $450. | How many more percent are owned with a mortgage than owned outright? | {
"spans": [
"1.2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1776 | 608f679a-02c4-4492-bf06-5c68c5600e1e | Home ownership in Sydney was less common than renting prior to the Second World War but this trend has since reversed. Median house prices have increased by an average of 8.6% per annum since 1970. The median house price in Sydney in March 2014 was $630,000. The primary cause for rising prices is the increasing cost of land which made up 32% of house prices in 1977 compared to 60% in 2002. 31.6% of dwellings in Sydney are rented, 30.4% are owned outright and 34.8% are owned with a mortgage. 11.8% of mortgagees in 2011 had monthly loan repayments of less than $1,000 and 82.9% had monthly repayments of $1,000 or more. 44.9% of renters for the same period had weekly rent of less than $350 whilst 51.7% had weekly rent of $350 or more. The median weekly rent in Sydney is $450. | How many more percent of renters had the weekly rent of $350 or more than those that had weekly rent under $350? | {
"spans": [
"6.8"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1776 | 4979bf58-b396-4832-ae1e-72f18d683d76 | Home ownership in Sydney was less common than renting prior to the Second World War but this trend has since reversed. Median house prices have increased by an average of 8.6% per annum since 1970. The median house price in Sydney in March 2014 was $630,000. The primary cause for rising prices is the increasing cost of land which made up 32% of house prices in 1977 compared to 60% in 2002. 31.6% of dwellings in Sydney are rented, 30.4% are owned outright and 34.8% are owned with a mortgage. 11.8% of mortgagees in 2011 had monthly loan repayments of less than $1,000 and 82.9% had monthly repayments of $1,000 or more. 44.9% of renters for the same period had weekly rent of less than $350 whilst 51.7% had weekly rent of $350 or more. The median weekly rent in Sydney is $450. | How many more percent does cost of land make up now in Sydney than it did in 1977? | {
"spans": [
"28"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1776 | 57de9c25-0ff1-469b-8359-f45e6bc110bb | Home ownership in Sydney was less common than renting prior to the Second World War but this trend has since reversed. Median house prices have increased by an average of 8.6% per annum since 1970. The median house price in Sydney in March 2014 was $630,000. The primary cause for rising prices is the increasing cost of land which made up 32% of house prices in 1977 compared to 60% in 2002. 31.6% of dwellings in Sydney are rented, 30.4% are owned outright and 34.8% are owned with a mortgage. 11.8% of mortgagees in 2011 had monthly loan repayments of less than $1,000 and 82.9% had monthly repayments of $1,000 or more. 44.9% of renters for the same period had weekly rent of less than $350 whilst 51.7% had weekly rent of $350 or more. The median weekly rent in Sydney is $450. | Are more homes in Sydney rented, owned outright, or owned with mortgage? | {
"spans": [
"owned with mortgage"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1776 | c97ecdca-3a44-47f2-b9f9-23838e0aa387 | Home ownership in Sydney was less common than renting prior to the Second World War but this trend has since reversed. Median house prices have increased by an average of 8.6% per annum since 1970. The median house price in Sydney in March 2014 was $630,000. The primary cause for rising prices is the increasing cost of land which made up 32% of house prices in 1977 compared to 60% in 2002. 31.6% of dwellings in Sydney are rented, 30.4% are owned outright and 34.8% are owned with a mortgage. 11.8% of mortgagees in 2011 had monthly loan repayments of less than $1,000 and 82.9% had monthly repayments of $1,000 or more. 44.9% of renters for the same period had weekly rent of less than $350 whilst 51.7% had weekly rent of $350 or more. The median weekly rent in Sydney is $450. | How many percent more of homes are owned with a mortgage than owned outright in Sydney? | {
"spans": [
"4.4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
nfl_2681 | efb8bea0-8308-47c4-8903-5afcba471783 | The game was the first meeting between the Titans and their former coach, Jeff Fisher, and the first game for the club since the passing of its founder, Bud Adams. The game lead tied or changed on every score as the Titans erupted to 198 rushing yards and four touchdowns on the ground. Chris Johnson scored twice amid 170 all-purpose yards (150 on the ground) while Jake Locker overcame two interceptions to throw for 185 yards and run in a six-yard score. | How many touchdowns did Chris Johnson score? | {
"spans": [
"2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
nfl_2681 | 06619645-5fc9-4d92-bc47-a8ed7ddad48b | The game was the first meeting between the Titans and their former coach, Jeff Fisher, and the first game for the club since the passing of its founder, Bud Adams. The game lead tied or changed on every score as the Titans erupted to 198 rushing yards and four touchdowns on the ground. Chris Johnson scored twice amid 170 all-purpose yards (150 on the ground) while Jake Locker overcame two interceptions to throw for 185 yards and run in a six-yard score. | How many rushing touchdowns did the Titans score? | {
"spans": [
"4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
nfl_2681 | 2fa18a17-234b-432f-90e9-8646a31b4d7a | The game was the first meeting between the Titans and their former coach, Jeff Fisher, and the first game for the club since the passing of its founder, Bud Adams. The game lead tied or changed on every score as the Titans erupted to 198 rushing yards and four touchdowns on the ground. Chris Johnson scored twice amid 170 all-purpose yards (150 on the ground) while Jake Locker overcame two interceptions to throw for 185 yards and run in a six-yard score. | How many receiving yards did Chris Johnson have during the game? | {
"spans": [
"20"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | 4701dfaf-3da7-4ed1-8971-56474c12d77f | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many more household were there than families in the 2010 census? | {
"spans": [
"6344"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | f1e8e58e-050f-4e39-a323-a3679a675400 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many more people were there than families as of the 2010 census? | {
"spans": [
"30186"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | acb307bb-798b-43e1-ba86-ac7e9efb47b2 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many more people were there than families as of the 2010 census? | {
"spans": [
"36530"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | ea21ae88-f5d0-4b88-b243-7dfd536326c9 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many people and households are in the county according to the 2010 census? | {
"spans": [
"70316"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | 3c5165f4-0718-4e3d-86a4-ee42b58e118c | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many people and families are in the county according to the 2010 census? | {
"spans": [
"63972"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | 1af7d8f0-f65f-40e1-80bc-121a92616cbb | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many households and families are in the county according to the 2010 census? | {
"spans": [
"33786"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | 23b7fb67-6c82-4a8d-bff6-5f57c09aa977 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | Which group is larger for the county according to the 2010 census: people or households? | {
"spans": [
"people"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1950 | 3a2ee967-0669-4ccf-ad36-45b901e09322 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | Which group is smaller for the county according to the 2010 census: people or households? | {
"spans": [
"households"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1950 | e8f04b03-f092-4912-b972-c136d0ac98eb | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | Which group is larger for the county according to the 2010 census: people or families? | {
"spans": [
"people"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1950 | a8b561c0-7dfa-4e6d-ba27-024bc8b53025 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | Which group is smaller for the county according to the 2010 census: people or families? | {
"spans": [
"families"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1950 | 2ddf5dea-0092-48dd-a09a-0fc536952c9a | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | Which group is larger for the county according to the 2010 census: households or families? | {
"spans": [
"households"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1950 | dadec0d6-8efc-4ed6-8c4a-b89b1390cab3 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | Which group is smaller for the county according to the 2010 census: households or families? | {
"spans": [
"families"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1950 | 3f028e69-b472-42b1-ad97-ae6590a7dc32 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many more people than households are in the county according to the 2010 census? | {
"spans": [
"30186"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | df59f5b7-2b32-4050-af85-d147137fdcf2 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many more people than families are in the county according to the 2010 census? | {
"spans": [
"36530"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | 7499dff7-ecd6-46d3-8cca-465193500d8f | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many people, households, and families are in the county according to the census? | {
"spans": [
"84037"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | b4685a8e-799c-4277-9854-de9d69ec6c4f | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many people and households are in the county according to the census? | {
"spans": [
"70316"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | 37b37551-af6c-46b6-9920-dd3aa52f7204 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many people and families are in the county according to the census? | {
"spans": [
"63972"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | 1bbec858-005e-47da-8f85-d1c0c0abf2e8 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many households and families are in the county according to the census? | {
"spans": [
"33786"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | 2ed5d9e0-49d5-43b5-9042-0d0a4e7e9618 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many more people than households are in the county according to the census? | {
"spans": [
"30186"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | 0884b75d-3303-4c8b-be95-be2e681a4b6e | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many more people than families are in the county according to the census? | {
"spans": [
"36530"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | 6ef81cb6-225e-4c1d-9e3d-df4ef37784d9 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | Which group is larger for the county according to the census: people or households? | {
"spans": [
"people"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1950 | fd25cd47-8b24-4c8b-abc9-8495c6200301 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | Which group is smaller for the county according to the census: people or households? | {
"spans": [
"households"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1950 | 26acf5a7-d889-41d0-b300-e8195829939e | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | Which group is larger for the county according to the census: people or families? | {
"spans": [
"people"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1950 | e516f17c-fe11-4cfd-8092-a86d3d16647f | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | Which group is smaller for the county according to the census: people or families? | {
"spans": [
"families"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1950 | fb73ff18-af2f-4ae7-b3f1-68925b22ea4f | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | Which group is larger for the county according to the census: households or families? | {
"spans": [
"households"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1950 | 1a8704f3-9550-42e6-8966-08dfa216379d | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | Which group is smaller for the county according to the census: households or families? | {
"spans": [
"families"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1950 | 0e84a34f-8643-412f-a7f1-15be558526fe | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many more people are there than households? | {
"spans": [
"30186"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | 7c08c749-57b6-48a1-ae7b-d9a22d439f18 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many more people are there than families? | {
"spans": [
"36530"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | 854e1079-0039-4158-b4d7-8fe00891d2cc | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many more people are there than housing units? | {
"spans": [
"27574"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | 673be7fd-0f25-47ec-a5ce-117703f41299 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many more households are there than families? | {
"spans": [
"6344"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | b02af8aa-06b9-4efe-b306-738e86c6ea0d | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many more housing units are there than families? | {
"spans": [
"8956"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | a8750c04-67fd-4da8-94a7-35dc8157d9b0 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many more housing units are there than households? | {
"spans": [
"2612"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | d79d24f9-8e94-4f0e-80f6-990e2a67c60d | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many percent of people were not from 2 or more races? | {
"spans": [
"97"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | 45b4aa84-f239-4744-a05b-8bcb912b76e2 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many percent of people were not white? | {
"spans": [
"25.9"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | 62465ee9-69cc-4f8d-a8eb-6512af91eede | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many people are there per 2 square miles? | {
"spans": [
"80"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | c405d2ee-930e-47b0-bdc7-90bf099f3f6f | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many percent of people were not Hispanic? | {
"spans": [
"94.4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | dc492b20-1bc8-44bd-921d-42e568743d12 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | Which has more, households or families? | {
"spans": [
"households"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1950 | e8a7ed09-73cf-4fcc-ad8c-1911a222935f | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | Which has less, people or families/ | {
"spans": [
"families"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1950 | 828c7282-b58d-4d7a-b39d-892e89aae3d2 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | Which groups are at least 21000 in size? | {
"spans": [
"people",
"housing units"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span"
]
} |
history_1950 | 2b64e57e-5a36-4d96-ba0e-1b2df1b5bf76 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | Which groups are fewer than 21000 in size? | {
"spans": [
"households",
"families",
"households",
"families"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span",
"span",
"span"
]
} |
history_1950 | cd32820c-f8fe-426f-bfec-7155bbb031b5 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many people and households are reported according to the census? | {
"spans": [
"70316"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | a52c2ffd-ca4f-41c0-bbb4-3c2ecd7eace3 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many people and families are reported according to the census? | {
"spans": [
"63972"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | 2f731430-61a4-480b-a438-535d9855edf1 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many households and families are reported according to the census? | {
"spans": [
"33786"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | 70dfd239-497b-4d7e-927f-1f631ef72304 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | How many more people than households are reported according to the census? | {
"spans": [
"30186"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1950 | c230f700-5970-473f-9d75-28a70e2c0fcd | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | Which group is larger according to the census: people or households? | {
"spans": [
"people"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1950 | 234a6d1d-93ba-4506-8111-f9999776b78d | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | Which group is smaller according to the census: people or households? | {
"spans": [
"households"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1950 | 0153b2df-d0a7-4b4e-bf57-b0d95dca4075 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | Which group is larger according to the census: people or families? | {
"spans": [
"people"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1950 | 1de1b7de-4bc2-4c1c-9435-60eb3db17796 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | Which group is smaller according to the census: people or families? | {
"spans": [
"families"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1950 | 899b5024-cda9-4253-bb27-d1323e4a8fd8 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | Which group is larger according to the census: households or families? | {
"spans": [
"households"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1950 | a65cc91f-3274-4ff9-a131-3e7eff114cb1 | As of the census of 2010, there were 50,251 people, 20,065 households, and 13,721 families residing in the county. The population density was 90 people per square mile (35/km2). There were 22,677 housing units at an average density of 40 per square mile (15/km2). The racial makeup of the county was 74.1% Race (United States Census), 19.3% Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census), 0.7% Race (United States Census), 1.1% Race (United States Census), 0.1% Race (United States Census), 1.8% from Race (United States Census), and 3.0% from two or more races. 5.6% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. | Which group is smaller according to the census: households or families? | {
"spans": [
"families"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1598 | 11628e1c-f7cd-491c-a5ab-d879d6e05a39 | The situation remained in stalemate for some time, with Charles of Blois as de facto duke, but with significant territory still controlled by the Montfortists. Outside events again began to have an effect on the conflict. A plague struck France and the king himself was captured by the English at the Battle of Poitiers in 1356. The French state was virtually paralysed. In 1362, when the younger John de Montfort reached 22 years of age, King Edward permitted him to return to Brittany. His return was conditioned by a covenant, the covenant not to marry without permission, given in pledge of several fortresses. On arrival, John attempted to reach agreement with Charles of Blois to make peace and share Brittany, but Charles's wife Joan urged him to resist and crush John. The war resumed in 1363 when Charles de Blois, assisted by Bertrand du Guesclin, had some successes, but when Bertrand left to take control of strongholds in Navarre and Normandy, Charles's advance halted at the unsuccessful siege of Bécherel. Another opportunity to negotiate an agreement arose, but again Joan blocked negotiations. John de Montfort moved to besiege Auray with renowned English warlord John Chandos. Charles of Blois and Bertrand du Guesclin came to the rescue of the besieged city, but they were decisively defeated at the Battle of Auray on 29 September 1364. This battle marked the end of this long conflict: Charles of Blois was killed and Joan of Penthièvre, finding herself a widow, saw her cause collapse. Du Guesclin was captured and ransomed by Charles V for 100,000 francs. | How many years was the war on hold? | {
"spans": [
"7"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1598 | e5afcfde-1a14-44ec-9123-039021e0ae98 | The situation remained in stalemate for some time, with Charles of Blois as de facto duke, but with significant territory still controlled by the Montfortists. Outside events again began to have an effect on the conflict. A plague struck France and the king himself was captured by the English at the Battle of Poitiers in 1356. The French state was virtually paralysed. In 1362, when the younger John de Montfort reached 22 years of age, King Edward permitted him to return to Brittany. His return was conditioned by a covenant, the covenant not to marry without permission, given in pledge of several fortresses. On arrival, John attempted to reach agreement with Charles of Blois to make peace and share Brittany, but Charles's wife Joan urged him to resist and crush John. The war resumed in 1363 when Charles de Blois, assisted by Bertrand du Guesclin, had some successes, but when Bertrand left to take control of strongholds in Navarre and Normandy, Charles's advance halted at the unsuccessful siege of Bécherel. Another opportunity to negotiate an agreement arose, but again Joan blocked negotiations. John de Montfort moved to besiege Auray with renowned English warlord John Chandos. Charles of Blois and Bertrand du Guesclin came to the rescue of the besieged city, but they were decisively defeated at the Battle of Auray on 29 September 1364. This battle marked the end of this long conflict: Charles of Blois was killed and Joan of Penthièvre, finding herself a widow, saw her cause collapse. Du Guesclin was captured and ransomed by Charles V for 100,000 francs. | Which occurred first the Battle of Auray or the Battle of Poitiers | {
"spans": [
"the Battle of Poitiers"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1598 | e21afa3a-a7b9-40de-bc86-9cf3ea1f7036 | The situation remained in stalemate for some time, with Charles of Blois as de facto duke, but with significant territory still controlled by the Montfortists. Outside events again began to have an effect on the conflict. A plague struck France and the king himself was captured by the English at the Battle of Poitiers in 1356. The French state was virtually paralysed. In 1362, when the younger John de Montfort reached 22 years of age, King Edward permitted him to return to Brittany. His return was conditioned by a covenant, the covenant not to marry without permission, given in pledge of several fortresses. On arrival, John attempted to reach agreement with Charles of Blois to make peace and share Brittany, but Charles's wife Joan urged him to resist and crush John. The war resumed in 1363 when Charles de Blois, assisted by Bertrand du Guesclin, had some successes, but when Bertrand left to take control of strongholds in Navarre and Normandy, Charles's advance halted at the unsuccessful siege of Bécherel. Another opportunity to negotiate an agreement arose, but again Joan blocked negotiations. John de Montfort moved to besiege Auray with renowned English warlord John Chandos. Charles of Blois and Bertrand du Guesclin came to the rescue of the besieged city, but they were decisively defeated at the Battle of Auray on 29 September 1364. This battle marked the end of this long conflict: Charles of Blois was killed and Joan of Penthièvre, finding herself a widow, saw her cause collapse. Du Guesclin was captured and ransomed by Charles V for 100,000 francs. | How many years after the Battle of Poitiers was King Edward permitted to return to Brittany? | {
"spans": [
"6"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1598 | 9e2c052a-f002-4f09-8b0f-99f59f15ae2b | The situation remained in stalemate for some time, with Charles of Blois as de facto duke, but with significant territory still controlled by the Montfortists. Outside events again began to have an effect on the conflict. A plague struck France and the king himself was captured by the English at the Battle of Poitiers in 1356. The French state was virtually paralysed. In 1362, when the younger John de Montfort reached 22 years of age, King Edward permitted him to return to Brittany. His return was conditioned by a covenant, the covenant not to marry without permission, given in pledge of several fortresses. On arrival, John attempted to reach agreement with Charles of Blois to make peace and share Brittany, but Charles's wife Joan urged him to resist and crush John. The war resumed in 1363 when Charles de Blois, assisted by Bertrand du Guesclin, had some successes, but when Bertrand left to take control of strongholds in Navarre and Normandy, Charles's advance halted at the unsuccessful siege of Bécherel. Another opportunity to negotiate an agreement arose, but again Joan blocked negotiations. John de Montfort moved to besiege Auray with renowned English warlord John Chandos. Charles of Blois and Bertrand du Guesclin came to the rescue of the besieged city, but they were decisively defeated at the Battle of Auray on 29 September 1364. This battle marked the end of this long conflict: Charles of Blois was killed and Joan of Penthièvre, finding herself a widow, saw her cause collapse. Du Guesclin was captured and ransomed by Charles V for 100,000 francs. | How many years was it between the Battle of Poitiers and the Battle of Auray? | {
"spans": [
"8"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1598 | 48e2d7c5-324f-461b-a472-076038a83170 | The situation remained in stalemate for some time, with Charles of Blois as de facto duke, but with significant territory still controlled by the Montfortists. Outside events again began to have an effect on the conflict. A plague struck France and the king himself was captured by the English at the Battle of Poitiers in 1356. The French state was virtually paralysed. In 1362, when the younger John de Montfort reached 22 years of age, King Edward permitted him to return to Brittany. His return was conditioned by a covenant, the covenant not to marry without permission, given in pledge of several fortresses. On arrival, John attempted to reach agreement with Charles of Blois to make peace and share Brittany, but Charles's wife Joan urged him to resist and crush John. The war resumed in 1363 when Charles de Blois, assisted by Bertrand du Guesclin, had some successes, but when Bertrand left to take control of strongholds in Navarre and Normandy, Charles's advance halted at the unsuccessful siege of Bécherel. Another opportunity to negotiate an agreement arose, but again Joan blocked negotiations. John de Montfort moved to besiege Auray with renowned English warlord John Chandos. Charles of Blois and Bertrand du Guesclin came to the rescue of the besieged city, but they were decisively defeated at the Battle of Auray on 29 September 1364. This battle marked the end of this long conflict: Charles of Blois was killed and Joan of Penthièvre, finding herself a widow, saw her cause collapse. Du Guesclin was captured and ransomed by Charles V for 100,000 francs. | Which event happened first, the Battle of Auray or the Battle of Poitiers? | {
"spans": [
"Battle of Poitiers"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1598 | 16f6ef54-bbff-49a8-9dde-9854bf1c5681 | The situation remained in stalemate for some time, with Charles of Blois as de facto duke, but with significant territory still controlled by the Montfortists. Outside events again began to have an effect on the conflict. A plague struck France and the king himself was captured by the English at the Battle of Poitiers in 1356. The French state was virtually paralysed. In 1362, when the younger John de Montfort reached 22 years of age, King Edward permitted him to return to Brittany. His return was conditioned by a covenant, the covenant not to marry without permission, given in pledge of several fortresses. On arrival, John attempted to reach agreement with Charles of Blois to make peace and share Brittany, but Charles's wife Joan urged him to resist and crush John. The war resumed in 1363 when Charles de Blois, assisted by Bertrand du Guesclin, had some successes, but when Bertrand left to take control of strongholds in Navarre and Normandy, Charles's advance halted at the unsuccessful siege of Bécherel. Another opportunity to negotiate an agreement arose, but again Joan blocked negotiations. John de Montfort moved to besiege Auray with renowned English warlord John Chandos. Charles of Blois and Bertrand du Guesclin came to the rescue of the besieged city, but they were decisively defeated at the Battle of Auray on 29 September 1364. This battle marked the end of this long conflict: Charles of Blois was killed and Joan of Penthièvre, finding herself a widow, saw her cause collapse. Du Guesclin was captured and ransomed by Charles V for 100,000 francs. | What year was John de Montfort born? | {
"spans": [
"1340"
],
"types": [
"date"
]
} |
history_1598 | 2ee41d51-ce13-4478-be6c-c94df919663f | The situation remained in stalemate for some time, with Charles of Blois as de facto duke, but with significant territory still controlled by the Montfortists. Outside events again began to have an effect on the conflict. A plague struck France and the king himself was captured by the English at the Battle of Poitiers in 1356. The French state was virtually paralysed. In 1362, when the younger John de Montfort reached 22 years of age, King Edward permitted him to return to Brittany. His return was conditioned by a covenant, the covenant not to marry without permission, given in pledge of several fortresses. On arrival, John attempted to reach agreement with Charles of Blois to make peace and share Brittany, but Charles's wife Joan urged him to resist and crush John. The war resumed in 1363 when Charles de Blois, assisted by Bertrand du Guesclin, had some successes, but when Bertrand left to take control of strongholds in Navarre and Normandy, Charles's advance halted at the unsuccessful siege of Bécherel. Another opportunity to negotiate an agreement arose, but again Joan blocked negotiations. John de Montfort moved to besiege Auray with renowned English warlord John Chandos. Charles of Blois and Bertrand du Guesclin came to the rescue of the besieged city, but they were decisively defeated at the Battle of Auray on 29 September 1364. This battle marked the end of this long conflict: Charles of Blois was killed and Joan of Penthièvre, finding herself a widow, saw her cause collapse. Du Guesclin was captured and ransomed by Charles V for 100,000 francs. | What happened first: Battle of Poitiers or Edward permitted John to return to Brittany? | {
"spans": [
"Battle of Poitiers"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1598 | 6e40547a-4344-4c2a-ad9b-37ef6f5342c7 | The situation remained in stalemate for some time, with Charles of Blois as de facto duke, but with significant territory still controlled by the Montfortists. Outside events again began to have an effect on the conflict. A plague struck France and the king himself was captured by the English at the Battle of Poitiers in 1356. The French state was virtually paralysed. In 1362, when the younger John de Montfort reached 22 years of age, King Edward permitted him to return to Brittany. His return was conditioned by a covenant, the covenant not to marry without permission, given in pledge of several fortresses. On arrival, John attempted to reach agreement with Charles of Blois to make peace and share Brittany, but Charles's wife Joan urged him to resist and crush John. The war resumed in 1363 when Charles de Blois, assisted by Bertrand du Guesclin, had some successes, but when Bertrand left to take control of strongholds in Navarre and Normandy, Charles's advance halted at the unsuccessful siege of Bécherel. Another opportunity to negotiate an agreement arose, but again Joan blocked negotiations. John de Montfort moved to besiege Auray with renowned English warlord John Chandos. Charles of Blois and Bertrand du Guesclin came to the rescue of the besieged city, but they were decisively defeated at the Battle of Auray on 29 September 1364. This battle marked the end of this long conflict: Charles of Blois was killed and Joan of Penthièvre, finding herself a widow, saw her cause collapse. Du Guesclin was captured and ransomed by Charles V for 100,000 francs. | What happened second: Battle of Poitiers or Edward permitted John to return to Brittany? | {
"spans": [
"Edward permitted John to return to Brittany"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1598 | 0c7e01ba-82e5-44c0-8109-7abc0236e87b | The situation remained in stalemate for some time, with Charles of Blois as de facto duke, but with significant territory still controlled by the Montfortists. Outside events again began to have an effect on the conflict. A plague struck France and the king himself was captured by the English at the Battle of Poitiers in 1356. The French state was virtually paralysed. In 1362, when the younger John de Montfort reached 22 years of age, King Edward permitted him to return to Brittany. His return was conditioned by a covenant, the covenant not to marry without permission, given in pledge of several fortresses. On arrival, John attempted to reach agreement with Charles of Blois to make peace and share Brittany, but Charles's wife Joan urged him to resist and crush John. The war resumed in 1363 when Charles de Blois, assisted by Bertrand du Guesclin, had some successes, but when Bertrand left to take control of strongholds in Navarre and Normandy, Charles's advance halted at the unsuccessful siege of Bécherel. Another opportunity to negotiate an agreement arose, but again Joan blocked negotiations. John de Montfort moved to besiege Auray with renowned English warlord John Chandos. Charles of Blois and Bertrand du Guesclin came to the rescue of the besieged city, but they were decisively defeated at the Battle of Auray on 29 September 1364. This battle marked the end of this long conflict: Charles of Blois was killed and Joan of Penthièvre, finding herself a widow, saw her cause collapse. Du Guesclin was captured and ransomed by Charles V for 100,000 francs. | Who was Joan's husband? | {
"spans": [
"Charles"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1598 | c4d04569-6bff-4c8e-9146-6821b08a2095 | The situation remained in stalemate for some time, with Charles of Blois as de facto duke, but with significant territory still controlled by the Montfortists. Outside events again began to have an effect on the conflict. A plague struck France and the king himself was captured by the English at the Battle of Poitiers in 1356. The French state was virtually paralysed. In 1362, when the younger John de Montfort reached 22 years of age, King Edward permitted him to return to Brittany. His return was conditioned by a covenant, the covenant not to marry without permission, given in pledge of several fortresses. On arrival, John attempted to reach agreement with Charles of Blois to make peace and share Brittany, but Charles's wife Joan urged him to resist and crush John. The war resumed in 1363 when Charles de Blois, assisted by Bertrand du Guesclin, had some successes, but when Bertrand left to take control of strongholds in Navarre and Normandy, Charles's advance halted at the unsuccessful siege of Bécherel. Another opportunity to negotiate an agreement arose, but again Joan blocked negotiations. John de Montfort moved to besiege Auray with renowned English warlord John Chandos. Charles of Blois and Bertrand du Guesclin came to the rescue of the besieged city, but they were decisively defeated at the Battle of Auray on 29 September 1364. This battle marked the end of this long conflict: Charles of Blois was killed and Joan of Penthièvre, finding herself a widow, saw her cause collapse. Du Guesclin was captured and ransomed by Charles V for 100,000 francs. | Which battle happened earlier, the Battle of Poitiers or the Battle of Auray? | {
"spans": [
"the Battle of Poitiers"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1598 | 5f21c5b4-b5b3-4fe5-ad96-6f2924b30595 | The situation remained in stalemate for some time, with Charles of Blois as de facto duke, but with significant territory still controlled by the Montfortists. Outside events again began to have an effect on the conflict. A plague struck France and the king himself was captured by the English at the Battle of Poitiers in 1356. The French state was virtually paralysed. In 1362, when the younger John de Montfort reached 22 years of age, King Edward permitted him to return to Brittany. His return was conditioned by a covenant, the covenant not to marry without permission, given in pledge of several fortresses. On arrival, John attempted to reach agreement with Charles of Blois to make peace and share Brittany, but Charles's wife Joan urged him to resist and crush John. The war resumed in 1363 when Charles de Blois, assisted by Bertrand du Guesclin, had some successes, but when Bertrand left to take control of strongholds in Navarre and Normandy, Charles's advance halted at the unsuccessful siege of Bécherel. Another opportunity to negotiate an agreement arose, but again Joan blocked negotiations. John de Montfort moved to besiege Auray with renowned English warlord John Chandos. Charles of Blois and Bertrand du Guesclin came to the rescue of the besieged city, but they were decisively defeated at the Battle of Auray on 29 September 1364. This battle marked the end of this long conflict: Charles of Blois was killed and Joan of Penthièvre, finding herself a widow, saw her cause collapse. Du Guesclin was captured and ransomed by Charles V for 100,000 francs. | How many years earlier did the Battle of Poitiers happen compared to the Battle of Auray? | {
"spans": [
"8"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1598 | 792c237c-80b7-41ad-9f49-b64f4d8e62ef | The situation remained in stalemate for some time, with Charles of Blois as de facto duke, but with significant territory still controlled by the Montfortists. Outside events again began to have an effect on the conflict. A plague struck France and the king himself was captured by the English at the Battle of Poitiers in 1356. The French state was virtually paralysed. In 1362, when the younger John de Montfort reached 22 years of age, King Edward permitted him to return to Brittany. His return was conditioned by a covenant, the covenant not to marry without permission, given in pledge of several fortresses. On arrival, John attempted to reach agreement with Charles of Blois to make peace and share Brittany, but Charles's wife Joan urged him to resist and crush John. The war resumed in 1363 when Charles de Blois, assisted by Bertrand du Guesclin, had some successes, but when Bertrand left to take control of strongholds in Navarre and Normandy, Charles's advance halted at the unsuccessful siege of Bécherel. Another opportunity to negotiate an agreement arose, but again Joan blocked negotiations. John de Montfort moved to besiege Auray with renowned English warlord John Chandos. Charles of Blois and Bertrand du Guesclin came to the rescue of the besieged city, but they were decisively defeated at the Battle of Auray on 29 September 1364. This battle marked the end of this long conflict: Charles of Blois was killed and Joan of Penthièvre, finding herself a widow, saw her cause collapse. Du Guesclin was captured and ransomed by Charles V for 100,000 francs. | How many years after the capture of the king at the Battle of Poitiers did John de Montfort return to Brittany? | {
"spans": [
"6"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1598 | d0df5b66-4cf6-4490-a363-ac6cbd8af8dc | The situation remained in stalemate for some time, with Charles of Blois as de facto duke, but with significant territory still controlled by the Montfortists. Outside events again began to have an effect on the conflict. A plague struck France and the king himself was captured by the English at the Battle of Poitiers in 1356. The French state was virtually paralysed. In 1362, when the younger John de Montfort reached 22 years of age, King Edward permitted him to return to Brittany. His return was conditioned by a covenant, the covenant not to marry without permission, given in pledge of several fortresses. On arrival, John attempted to reach agreement with Charles of Blois to make peace and share Brittany, but Charles's wife Joan urged him to resist and crush John. The war resumed in 1363 when Charles de Blois, assisted by Bertrand du Guesclin, had some successes, but when Bertrand left to take control of strongholds in Navarre and Normandy, Charles's advance halted at the unsuccessful siege of Bécherel. Another opportunity to negotiate an agreement arose, but again Joan blocked negotiations. John de Montfort moved to besiege Auray with renowned English warlord John Chandos. Charles of Blois and Bertrand du Guesclin came to the rescue of the besieged city, but they were decisively defeated at the Battle of Auray on 29 September 1364. This battle marked the end of this long conflict: Charles of Blois was killed and Joan of Penthièvre, finding herself a widow, saw her cause collapse. Du Guesclin was captured and ransomed by Charles V for 100,000 francs. | How many years after John de Montfort's return to Brittany did the war resume? | {
"spans": [
"1"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1598 | cf673447-7164-451d-af55-dea6cbbacad2 | The situation remained in stalemate for some time, with Charles of Blois as de facto duke, but with significant territory still controlled by the Montfortists. Outside events again began to have an effect on the conflict. A plague struck France and the king himself was captured by the English at the Battle of Poitiers in 1356. The French state was virtually paralysed. In 1362, when the younger John de Montfort reached 22 years of age, King Edward permitted him to return to Brittany. His return was conditioned by a covenant, the covenant not to marry without permission, given in pledge of several fortresses. On arrival, John attempted to reach agreement with Charles of Blois to make peace and share Brittany, but Charles's wife Joan urged him to resist and crush John. The war resumed in 1363 when Charles de Blois, assisted by Bertrand du Guesclin, had some successes, but when Bertrand left to take control of strongholds in Navarre and Normandy, Charles's advance halted at the unsuccessful siege of Bécherel. Another opportunity to negotiate an agreement arose, but again Joan blocked negotiations. John de Montfort moved to besiege Auray with renowned English warlord John Chandos. Charles of Blois and Bertrand du Guesclin came to the rescue of the besieged city, but they were decisively defeated at the Battle of Auray on 29 September 1364. This battle marked the end of this long conflict: Charles of Blois was killed and Joan of Penthièvre, finding herself a widow, saw her cause collapse. Du Guesclin was captured and ransomed by Charles V for 100,000 francs. | How many years after the resumption of the war did the conflict end? | {
"spans": [
"1"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_1598 | a8a089e8-8359-46a6-9de9-681318855704 | The situation remained in stalemate for some time, with Charles of Blois as de facto duke, but with significant territory still controlled by the Montfortists. Outside events again began to have an effect on the conflict. A plague struck France and the king himself was captured by the English at the Battle of Poitiers in 1356. The French state was virtually paralysed. In 1362, when the younger John de Montfort reached 22 years of age, King Edward permitted him to return to Brittany. His return was conditioned by a covenant, the covenant not to marry without permission, given in pledge of several fortresses. On arrival, John attempted to reach agreement with Charles of Blois to make peace and share Brittany, but Charles's wife Joan urged him to resist and crush John. The war resumed in 1363 when Charles de Blois, assisted by Bertrand du Guesclin, had some successes, but when Bertrand left to take control of strongholds in Navarre and Normandy, Charles's advance halted at the unsuccessful siege of Bécherel. Another opportunity to negotiate an agreement arose, but again Joan blocked negotiations. John de Montfort moved to besiege Auray with renowned English warlord John Chandos. Charles of Blois and Bertrand du Guesclin came to the rescue of the besieged city, but they were decisively defeated at the Battle of Auray on 29 September 1364. This battle marked the end of this long conflict: Charles of Blois was killed and Joan of Penthièvre, finding herself a widow, saw her cause collapse. Du Guesclin was captured and ransomed by Charles V for 100,000 francs. | Who was ransomed by Charles V for 100,000 francs? | {
"spans": [
"Bertrand du Guesclin"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_1598 | 5240ae26-b3da-4164-9b5c-9a3a010fbe71 | The situation remained in stalemate for some time, with Charles of Blois as de facto duke, but with significant territory still controlled by the Montfortists. Outside events again began to have an effect on the conflict. A plague struck France and the king himself was captured by the English at the Battle of Poitiers in 1356. The French state was virtually paralysed. In 1362, when the younger John de Montfort reached 22 years of age, King Edward permitted him to return to Brittany. His return was conditioned by a covenant, the covenant not to marry without permission, given in pledge of several fortresses. On arrival, John attempted to reach agreement with Charles of Blois to make peace and share Brittany, but Charles's wife Joan urged him to resist and crush John. The war resumed in 1363 when Charles de Blois, assisted by Bertrand du Guesclin, had some successes, but when Bertrand left to take control of strongholds in Navarre and Normandy, Charles's advance halted at the unsuccessful siege of Bécherel. Another opportunity to negotiate an agreement arose, but again Joan blocked negotiations. John de Montfort moved to besiege Auray with renowned English warlord John Chandos. Charles of Blois and Bertrand du Guesclin came to the rescue of the besieged city, but they were decisively defeated at the Battle of Auray on 29 September 1364. This battle marked the end of this long conflict: Charles of Blois was killed and Joan of Penthièvre, finding herself a widow, saw her cause collapse. Du Guesclin was captured and ransomed by Charles V for 100,000 francs. | Who permitted the younger John de Montfort to return to Brittany? | {
"spans": [
"the king"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
nfl_2829 | 6890ee31-5978-4e4f-a1c5-99f4fea890f3 | Following a terrible loss to the Browns, the Steelers returned home for a duel against the Texans on Monday Night Football. The Texans started out strong when Ryan Fitzpatrick found Alfred Blue on an 11-yard pass for a 7-0 lead and the only score of the first quarter. In the 2nd quarter, the Texans increased their lead as Randy Bullock nailed 2 field goals from 39 and 38 yards out for 10-0 and 13-0 leads. The Steelers finally got on the board and scored 24 unanswered points: first starting with Shaun Suisham who nailed a 44-yard field goal for a 13-3 game followed up by Ben Roethlisberger finding Martavis Bryant on a 35-yard TD pass for a 13-10 game and eventually took the lead on Antonio Brown's 1-yard TD pass to Lance Moore 17-13 and lastly Roethlisberger hooking up with Le'Veon Bell on a 2-yard TD pass for a 24-13 halftime lead. After a scoreless 3rd quarter, the Texans came within 8 as Bullock kicked a 31-yard field goal for a 24-16 game not long before the Steelers responded with 2 of their own from Suisham when he got them from 30 and 40 yards out for leads of 27-16 and 30-16. Finally, Fitzpatrick was able to find Arian Foster on a 1-yard TD pass and this led to the final score of 30-23. | Which kicker kicked the longest field goal? | {
"spans": [
"Shaun Suisham"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
nfl_2829 | 64767d15-f1d5-44a7-bc1b-74a4f21f7380 | Following a terrible loss to the Browns, the Steelers returned home for a duel against the Texans on Monday Night Football. The Texans started out strong when Ryan Fitzpatrick found Alfred Blue on an 11-yard pass for a 7-0 lead and the only score of the first quarter. In the 2nd quarter, the Texans increased their lead as Randy Bullock nailed 2 field goals from 39 and 38 yards out for 10-0 and 13-0 leads. The Steelers finally got on the board and scored 24 unanswered points: first starting with Shaun Suisham who nailed a 44-yard field goal for a 13-3 game followed up by Ben Roethlisberger finding Martavis Bryant on a 35-yard TD pass for a 13-10 game and eventually took the lead on Antonio Brown's 1-yard TD pass to Lance Moore 17-13 and lastly Roethlisberger hooking up with Le'Veon Bell on a 2-yard TD pass for a 24-13 halftime lead. After a scoreless 3rd quarter, the Texans came within 8 as Bullock kicked a 31-yard field goal for a 24-16 game not long before the Steelers responded with 2 of their own from Suisham when he got them from 30 and 40 yards out for leads of 27-16 and 30-16. Finally, Fitzpatrick was able to find Arian Foster on a 1-yard TD pass and this led to the final score of 30-23. | Did Randy Bullock kick more field goals in the 2nd or fourth quarter? | {
"spans": [
"2nd"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
nfl_2829 | 5380213b-1486-497b-8a14-725e002bab25 | Following a terrible loss to the Browns, the Steelers returned home for a duel against the Texans on Monday Night Football. The Texans started out strong when Ryan Fitzpatrick found Alfred Blue on an 11-yard pass for a 7-0 lead and the only score of the first quarter. In the 2nd quarter, the Texans increased their lead as Randy Bullock nailed 2 field goals from 39 and 38 yards out for 10-0 and 13-0 leads. The Steelers finally got on the board and scored 24 unanswered points: first starting with Shaun Suisham who nailed a 44-yard field goal for a 13-3 game followed up by Ben Roethlisberger finding Martavis Bryant on a 35-yard TD pass for a 13-10 game and eventually took the lead on Antonio Brown's 1-yard TD pass to Lance Moore 17-13 and lastly Roethlisberger hooking up with Le'Veon Bell on a 2-yard TD pass for a 24-13 halftime lead. After a scoreless 3rd quarter, the Texans came within 8 as Bullock kicked a 31-yard field goal for a 24-16 game not long before the Steelers responded with 2 of their own from Suisham when he got them from 30 and 40 yards out for leads of 27-16 and 30-16. Finally, Fitzpatrick was able to find Arian Foster on a 1-yard TD pass and this led to the final score of 30-23. | In which quarter was the longest field goal kicked? | {
"spans": [
"2nd"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
nfl_2829 | c689a953-afe6-4e9c-b0db-846ccd43cce5 | Following a terrible loss to the Browns, the Steelers returned home for a duel against the Texans on Monday Night Football. The Texans started out strong when Ryan Fitzpatrick found Alfred Blue on an 11-yard pass for a 7-0 lead and the only score of the first quarter. In the 2nd quarter, the Texans increased their lead as Randy Bullock nailed 2 field goals from 39 and 38 yards out for 10-0 and 13-0 leads. The Steelers finally got on the board and scored 24 unanswered points: first starting with Shaun Suisham who nailed a 44-yard field goal for a 13-3 game followed up by Ben Roethlisberger finding Martavis Bryant on a 35-yard TD pass for a 13-10 game and eventually took the lead on Antonio Brown's 1-yard TD pass to Lance Moore 17-13 and lastly Roethlisberger hooking up with Le'Veon Bell on a 2-yard TD pass for a 24-13 halftime lead. After a scoreless 3rd quarter, the Texans came within 8 as Bullock kicked a 31-yard field goal for a 24-16 game not long before the Steelers responded with 2 of their own from Suisham when he got them from 30 and 40 yards out for leads of 27-16 and 30-16. Finally, Fitzpatrick was able to find Arian Foster on a 1-yard TD pass and this led to the final score of 30-23. | How many points did the Texans score in the 2nd quarter? | {
"spans": [
"6"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
nfl_2829 | 8f8fa969-9529-4aa9-a4d4-257c7183394f | Following a terrible loss to the Browns, the Steelers returned home for a duel against the Texans on Monday Night Football. The Texans started out strong when Ryan Fitzpatrick found Alfred Blue on an 11-yard pass for a 7-0 lead and the only score of the first quarter. In the 2nd quarter, the Texans increased their lead as Randy Bullock nailed 2 field goals from 39 and 38 yards out for 10-0 and 13-0 leads. The Steelers finally got on the board and scored 24 unanswered points: first starting with Shaun Suisham who nailed a 44-yard field goal for a 13-3 game followed up by Ben Roethlisberger finding Martavis Bryant on a 35-yard TD pass for a 13-10 game and eventually took the lead on Antonio Brown's 1-yard TD pass to Lance Moore 17-13 and lastly Roethlisberger hooking up with Le'Veon Bell on a 2-yard TD pass for a 24-13 halftime lead. After a scoreless 3rd quarter, the Texans came within 8 as Bullock kicked a 31-yard field goal for a 24-16 game not long before the Steelers responded with 2 of their own from Suisham when he got them from 30 and 40 yards out for leads of 27-16 and 30-16. Finally, Fitzpatrick was able to find Arian Foster on a 1-yard TD pass and this led to the final score of 30-23. | How many more points did the Steelers score in the 2nd quarter compared to the Texans? | {
"spans": [
"18"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
nfl_2829 | 4ea59191-b669-4083-9c72-d5782f78af5e | Following a terrible loss to the Browns, the Steelers returned home for a duel against the Texans on Monday Night Football. The Texans started out strong when Ryan Fitzpatrick found Alfred Blue on an 11-yard pass for a 7-0 lead and the only score of the first quarter. In the 2nd quarter, the Texans increased their lead as Randy Bullock nailed 2 field goals from 39 and 38 yards out for 10-0 and 13-0 leads. The Steelers finally got on the board and scored 24 unanswered points: first starting with Shaun Suisham who nailed a 44-yard field goal for a 13-3 game followed up by Ben Roethlisberger finding Martavis Bryant on a 35-yard TD pass for a 13-10 game and eventually took the lead on Antonio Brown's 1-yard TD pass to Lance Moore 17-13 and lastly Roethlisberger hooking up with Le'Veon Bell on a 2-yard TD pass for a 24-13 halftime lead. After a scoreless 3rd quarter, the Texans came within 8 as Bullock kicked a 31-yard field goal for a 24-16 game not long before the Steelers responded with 2 of their own from Suisham when he got them from 30 and 40 yards out for leads of 27-16 and 30-16. Finally, Fitzpatrick was able to find Arian Foster on a 1-yard TD pass and this led to the final score of 30-23. | Which quarterback threw the longest touchdown pass? | {
"spans": [
"Ben Roethlisberger"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
nfl_2829 | f799f41e-bdf1-4284-8917-d74bb4bc4892 | Following a terrible loss to the Browns, the Steelers returned home for a duel against the Texans on Monday Night Football. The Texans started out strong when Ryan Fitzpatrick found Alfred Blue on an 11-yard pass for a 7-0 lead and the only score of the first quarter. In the 2nd quarter, the Texans increased their lead as Randy Bullock nailed 2 field goals from 39 and 38 yards out for 10-0 and 13-0 leads. The Steelers finally got on the board and scored 24 unanswered points: first starting with Shaun Suisham who nailed a 44-yard field goal for a 13-3 game followed up by Ben Roethlisberger finding Martavis Bryant on a 35-yard TD pass for a 13-10 game and eventually took the lead on Antonio Brown's 1-yard TD pass to Lance Moore 17-13 and lastly Roethlisberger hooking up with Le'Veon Bell on a 2-yard TD pass for a 24-13 halftime lead. After a scoreless 3rd quarter, the Texans came within 8 as Bullock kicked a 31-yard field goal for a 24-16 game not long before the Steelers responded with 2 of their own from Suisham when he got them from 30 and 40 yards out for leads of 27-16 and 30-16. Finally, Fitzpatrick was able to find Arian Foster on a 1-yard TD pass and this led to the final score of 30-23. | How many points were scored in the second half of the game? | {
"spans": [
"16"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
nfl_2829 | d14c88c3-fa47-4430-a09d-c14d7b5ca25c | Following a terrible loss to the Browns, the Steelers returned home for a duel against the Texans on Monday Night Football. The Texans started out strong when Ryan Fitzpatrick found Alfred Blue on an 11-yard pass for a 7-0 lead and the only score of the first quarter. In the 2nd quarter, the Texans increased their lead as Randy Bullock nailed 2 field goals from 39 and 38 yards out for 10-0 and 13-0 leads. The Steelers finally got on the board and scored 24 unanswered points: first starting with Shaun Suisham who nailed a 44-yard field goal for a 13-3 game followed up by Ben Roethlisberger finding Martavis Bryant on a 35-yard TD pass for a 13-10 game and eventually took the lead on Antonio Brown's 1-yard TD pass to Lance Moore 17-13 and lastly Roethlisberger hooking up with Le'Veon Bell on a 2-yard TD pass for a 24-13 halftime lead. After a scoreless 3rd quarter, the Texans came within 8 as Bullock kicked a 31-yard field goal for a 24-16 game not long before the Steelers responded with 2 of their own from Suisham when he got them from 30 and 40 yards out for leads of 27-16 and 30-16. Finally, Fitzpatrick was able to find Arian Foster on a 1-yard TD pass and this led to the final score of 30-23. | How many total yards of field goals were made in the game? | {
"spans": [
"222"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
nfl_2829 | 8dacdc91-3ce3-455d-8acb-4b323e068f57 | Following a terrible loss to the Browns, the Steelers returned home for a duel against the Texans on Monday Night Football. The Texans started out strong when Ryan Fitzpatrick found Alfred Blue on an 11-yard pass for a 7-0 lead and the only score of the first quarter. In the 2nd quarter, the Texans increased their lead as Randy Bullock nailed 2 field goals from 39 and 38 yards out for 10-0 and 13-0 leads. The Steelers finally got on the board and scored 24 unanswered points: first starting with Shaun Suisham who nailed a 44-yard field goal for a 13-3 game followed up by Ben Roethlisberger finding Martavis Bryant on a 35-yard TD pass for a 13-10 game and eventually took the lead on Antonio Brown's 1-yard TD pass to Lance Moore 17-13 and lastly Roethlisberger hooking up with Le'Veon Bell on a 2-yard TD pass for a 24-13 halftime lead. After a scoreless 3rd quarter, the Texans came within 8 as Bullock kicked a 31-yard field goal for a 24-16 game not long before the Steelers responded with 2 of their own from Suisham when he got them from 30 and 40 yards out for leads of 27-16 and 30-16. Finally, Fitzpatrick was able to find Arian Foster on a 1-yard TD pass and this led to the final score of 30-23. | How many total yards of field goals did Randy Bullock make? | {
"spans": [
"108"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
nfl_2829 | 218fe337-93f7-4e9a-8456-e8413c312294 | Following a terrible loss to the Browns, the Steelers returned home for a duel against the Texans on Monday Night Football. The Texans started out strong when Ryan Fitzpatrick found Alfred Blue on an 11-yard pass for a 7-0 lead and the only score of the first quarter. In the 2nd quarter, the Texans increased their lead as Randy Bullock nailed 2 field goals from 39 and 38 yards out for 10-0 and 13-0 leads. The Steelers finally got on the board and scored 24 unanswered points: first starting with Shaun Suisham who nailed a 44-yard field goal for a 13-3 game followed up by Ben Roethlisberger finding Martavis Bryant on a 35-yard TD pass for a 13-10 game and eventually took the lead on Antonio Brown's 1-yard TD pass to Lance Moore 17-13 and lastly Roethlisberger hooking up with Le'Veon Bell on a 2-yard TD pass for a 24-13 halftime lead. After a scoreless 3rd quarter, the Texans came within 8 as Bullock kicked a 31-yard field goal for a 24-16 game not long before the Steelers responded with 2 of their own from Suisham when he got them from 30 and 40 yards out for leads of 27-16 and 30-16. Finally, Fitzpatrick was able to find Arian Foster on a 1-yard TD pass and this led to the final score of 30-23. | How many total yards of field goals did Shaun Suisham make? | {
"spans": [
"114"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.