section_id
string | query_id
string | passage
string | question
string | answers_spans
sequence |
---|---|---|---|---|
history_2186 | 840cc502-2851-4d33-8492-a9b993b1ff93 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many percent were not 65 years of age or older? | {
"spans": [
"89.9"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | 121fc589-0b85-4ed1-972d-ea3e2bbf43d6 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many more females per 100 were there than males? | {
"spans": [
"4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | ba957355-be61-4ca4-b7ee-fb8e86c1bdd3 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many more females per 100 were there than males 18 or over? | {
"spans": [
"7.5"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | 86e97065-110d-4ccc-a52c-a1d8a1a28b20 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group had the most people? | {
"spans": [
"25 to 44"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 7b65a401-a93f-4b3f-9a25-473709a55cf0 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group had the second most people? | {
"spans": [
"under the age of 18"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | ba9e780d-aa01-4b9a-bc32-53f78585c7fb | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group had the third most people? | {
"spans": [
"45 to 64"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | eda7c78b-0abd-4098-8d9a-568e327f0e3c | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group had the fourth most people? | {
"spans": [
"65 years of age"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 71f9547c-fb46-4f29-8f50-7b2943887126 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't under the age of 18? | {
"spans": [
"72.1"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | 724e0996-7078-4892-977c-ab42eedb8e65 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't 18 to 24? | {
"spans": [
"93.2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | 8db0b7b4-9734-402f-b68d-181e63b8bc91 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't 25 to 44? | {
"spans": [
"68.4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | c0b72500-b281-4847-81f9-2402fc88585a | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't 45 to 64? | {
"spans": [
"76.3"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | 8b425bb1-6823-4206-a5b9-6288347993d7 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't 65 years of age or older? | {
"spans": [
"89.9"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | c949861a-61a8-4c78-9539-3c058ab7bf0a | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which gender group is larger: females or males? | {
"spans": [
"females"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 31e1b118-0f8b-480f-9f01-5acf9fbd2d01 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which gender group is smaller: females or males? | {
"spans": [
"males"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | f85d7b70-ebc6-4214-8f36-d0f4b46d013d | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group is larger: under the age of 18 or 18 to 24? | {
"spans": [
"under the age of 18"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | c21b8156-b987-4134-bdc2-81d004462028 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group is smaller: under the age of 18 or 18 to 24? | {
"spans": [
"18 to 24"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 0b71ef27-8b22-4048-b9bd-71656c54aa83 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group is larger: 25 to 44 or 45 to 64? | {
"spans": [
"25 to 44"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 237d3360-7b6d-4fb3-9931-f4d9e32a7ebe | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group is smaller: 25 to 44 or 45 to 64? | {
"spans": [
"45 to 64"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 9c326c0d-9186-48e7-b4f6-65281155485f | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group is larger: under the age of 18 or 65 years of age or older? | {
"spans": [
"under the age of 18"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | f28a090e-943f-4504-9609-2877b22e9209 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which groups in percent are larger than 12%? | {
"spans": [
"under the age of 18",
"25 to 44",
"45 to 64"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span",
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | eec522b1-735c-4a7c-a40c-6f8f49d1d153 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't under the age of 18? | {
"spans": [
"72.1"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | 05506e7d-cb5b-450f-b9b9-b2c0341ab89b | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't 18 to 24? | {
"spans": [
"93.2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | ae129615-85f1-4398-a748-2db062be62bd | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't 25 to 44? | {
"spans": [
"68.4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | 3e8f31ff-c163-4542-9107-fb86879a047e | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't 45 to 64? | {
"spans": [
"76.3"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | 769c682c-a49a-4392-b013-0812f351d3a1 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't 65 years of age or older? | {
"spans": [
"89.9"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | f66d49c4-d024-40d9-968d-cd299aeffb71 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which gender group is larger: females or males? | {
"spans": [
"females"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | b9e06b25-f755-4f2a-8ca4-19836a4837ef | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which gender group is smaller: females or males? | {
"spans": [
"males"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 18881c9d-42a2-4393-b318-2bb4167042d8 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group is larger: under the age of 18 or 18 to 24? | {
"spans": [
"under the age of 18"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 9a42242e-7123-454f-9678-564b30828f00 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group is smaller: under the age of 18 or 18 to 24? | {
"spans": [
"18 to 24"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 16ec110a-c24f-4a63-97e3-600c44c500cf | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group is larger: 25 to 44 or 45 to 64? | {
"spans": [
"25 to 44"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 01ad76f4-7445-4413-9da5-cef077b54929 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group is smaller: 25 to 44 or 45 to 64? | {
"spans": [
"45 to 64"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | a5e7a3a3-77fe-4c0c-8b2e-1f2f4082c53d | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which groups in percent are larger than 12%? | {
"spans": [
"under the age of 18",
"25 to 44",
"45 to 64"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span",
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 29bde300-d7cb-4fed-8a6e-ddcf10e1e081 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't under the age of 18? | {
"spans": [
"72.1"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | 07ff501d-ff7f-4bba-8bfa-6a0333dbf870 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't 18 to 24? | {
"spans": [
"93.2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | 88b8421c-1509-4a9b-8795-2aa43d95041c | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't 25 to 44? | {
"spans": [
"68.4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | 023128c7-4dd5-41ea-86d1-33ddc2999808 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't 45 to 64? | {
"spans": [
"76.3"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | f71ebabf-4777-46fc-bedc-7eee2fd83d14 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't 65 years of age or older? | {
"spans": [
"89.9"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | 257fa460-3f5f-42f4-9cdb-3dd0a4d0c40c | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which gender group is larger: females or males? | {
"spans": [
"females"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | c59f21a1-0200-4329-8421-2fb08e3eb9b6 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which gender group is smaller: females or males? | {
"spans": [
"males"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | fa90d300-a5bf-40f5-ba9c-87fe46d59ac6 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group is larger: under the age of 18 or 18 to 24? | {
"spans": [
"under the age of 18"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | ebc530df-8400-4e9c-9b66-12d584aabd85 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group is smaller: under the age of 18 or 18 to 24? | {
"spans": [
"18 to 24"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | d34f24e6-1616-41ba-be07-58dcbae4bb58 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group is larger: 25 to 44 or 45 to 64? | {
"spans": [
"25 to 44"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | ff08a979-9ad3-4466-84ce-f30f346615f9 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group is smaller: 25 to 44 or 45 to 64? | {
"spans": [
"45 to 64"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | dfc59fe1-acdf-42f1-8b0d-ff9772ebc2c5 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which groups in percent are larger than 13%? | {
"spans": [
"under the age of 18",
"25 to 44",
"45 to 64"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span",
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 695640fc-4429-4a10-9f79-c4959bd75446 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't under the age of 18? | {
"spans": [
"72.1"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | 6e22c357-abb2-4dda-944f-af6d5821b9e3 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't 18 to 24? | {
"spans": [
"93.2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | f0470092-4aa2-47f7-83f3-8e1a8ff58e3a | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't 25 to 44? | {
"spans": [
"68.4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | 0a6a2db2-38e1-4e9f-8e1d-e574a1985f91 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't 45 to 64? | {
"spans": [
"76.3"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | 9ebb21dc-3281-425a-864c-7077f3e93e90 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't 65 years of age or older? | {
"spans": [
"89.9"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | 258c2923-a4e3-4de0-91cd-e088e3f2afad | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which gender group is larger: females or males? | {
"spans": [
"females"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 6f8ae080-79bc-41ec-8c79-0450cdd8b7ad | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which gender group is smaller: females or males? | {
"spans": [
"males"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | c3ba7fed-dacc-414a-89f1-fe6660e184e0 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group is larger: under the age of 18 or 18 to 24? | {
"spans": [
"under the age of 18"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 257b41b5-bd86-4485-bd27-18a504a652b1 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group is smaller: under the age of 18 or 18 to 24? | {
"spans": [
"18 to 24"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 02ee4e1f-08e3-4c30-98c4-bc9f8121b1d9 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group is larger: 25 to 44 or 45 to 64? | {
"spans": [
"25 to 44"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | eeaad305-fdae-4897-b864-aaae13e06fa4 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group is smaller: 25 to 44 or 45 to 64? | {
"spans": [
"45 to 64"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 420b95da-2e3d-47e5-b893-353f89ba2285 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which groups in percent are larger than 25%? | {
"spans": [
"under the age of 18",
"25 to 44"
],
"types": [
"span",
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 98c203fc-6769-4d92-b3f8-e47d2c00eaf1 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't 65 years of age or older? | {
"spans": [
"89.9"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | 0fb3d1a7-2b14-4c8f-b122-c36c91bf39aa | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't 45 to 64? | {
"spans": [
"76.3"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | dc22a07b-3d8c-4320-9c9d-b5abeec14b9f | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't 25 to 44? | {
"spans": [
"68.4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | 216c628d-72e8-4fe1-9bc5-0e48de182b1d | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't 18 to 24? | {
"spans": [
"93.2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | 3b4689f8-21f9-48aa-a93b-72d71ee5491e | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many in percent weren't under the age of 18? | {
"spans": [
"72.1"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | db792ea3-262f-4ba0-ba14-4eeb8f443a00 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which gender group is larger: females or males? | {
"spans": [
"females"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 01069cf9-a087-49e6-a841-99c32a89b68a | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which gender group is smaller: females or males? | {
"spans": [
"males"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 9ed0a20c-89c4-4942-a57f-1c64b8684676 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group is larger: under the age of 18 or 18 to 24? | {
"spans": [
"under the age of 18"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 48858dd2-d409-4006-870d-ee21e0521f24 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group is smaller: under the age of 18 or 18 to 24? | {
"spans": [
"18 to 24"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | f08c7aa5-275b-49c2-835f-46401845a9c4 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group is larger: 25 to 44 or 45 to 64? | {
"spans": [
"25 to 44"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 988416b6-7b45-4a6c-b360-d0ab16863ccb | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group is smaller: 25 to 44 or 45 to 64? | {
"spans": [
"45 to 64"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 43630cf4-90d7-4fc0-8bca-5405afc36e3d | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many percent were not under the age of 18? | {
"spans": [
"72.1"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | f29a0085-e4d6-4d7e-8930-b66885a4f8ef | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many percent were not from 18 to 24? | {
"spans": [
"93.2"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | b03da4d8-6508-4632-94c0-09898cf340f8 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many percent were not from 25 to 44? | {
"spans": [
"68.4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | 23286369-20cf-448a-b2fb-1acfac03a3b0 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many percent were not from 45 to 64? | {
"spans": [
"76.3"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | d0a80d43-c8e8-473b-89a1-753c93060021 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many percent were not 65 years of age or older? | {
"spans": [
"89.9"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | f16588fc-f24b-4fd6-916a-016046e85c75 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many years old was the average person? | {
"spans": [
"36"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | bbb6a076-7f91-4db1-86f1-e9144a6bf301 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many percent were not female? | {
"spans": [
"4"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | 94d1b7d5-e79a-43f0-ad13-06d9129d10a7 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | How many percent were not male? | {
"spans": [
"7.5"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2186 | c74c0c31-b136-48a1-92c1-f7815a138837 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group had the most people? | {
"spans": [
"25 to 44"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 620e13bf-6622-4c85-b782-cae9ee981a63 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group had the least people? | {
"spans": [
"18 to 24"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | 428b6631-1a24-4b79-b967-e7f521e95a57 | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group had the second most people? | {
"spans": [
"under the age of 18"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2186 | ef94c107-5d6e-41c3-a709-bc0408874d2f | In the county, the age distribution of the population shows 27.90% under the age of 18, 6.80% from 18 to 24, 31.60% from 25 to 44, 23.70% from 45 to 64, and 10.10% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 36 years. For every 100 females there were 96.00 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.50 males. | Which age group had the third most people? | {
"spans": [
"45 to 64"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2461 | a8fdcb15-9fa1-4ae8-9538-66c03407acde | In recent decades, the literacy rate of Rajasthan has increased significantly. In 1991, the states literacy rate was only 38.55% (54.99% male and 20.44% female). In 2001, the literacy rate increased to 60.41% (75.70% male and 43.85% female). This was the highest leap in the percentage of literacy recorded in India (the rise in female literacy being 23%). At the Census 2011, Rajasthan had a literacy rate of 67.06% (80.51% male and 52.66% female). Although Rajasthans literacy rate is below the national average of 74.04% and although its female literacy rate is the lowest in the country, the state has been praised for its efforts and achievements in raising literacy rates. | By how many percentage points did the overall literacy rate increase between 1991 to 2001? | {
"spans": [
"21.86"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2461 | 0c652045-b5e0-4104-97bb-8e1ba9dc9349 | In recent decades, the literacy rate of Rajasthan has increased significantly. In 1991, the states literacy rate was only 38.55% (54.99% male and 20.44% female). In 2001, the literacy rate increased to 60.41% (75.70% male and 43.85% female). This was the highest leap in the percentage of literacy recorded in India (the rise in female literacy being 23%). At the Census 2011, Rajasthan had a literacy rate of 67.06% (80.51% male and 52.66% female). Although Rajasthans literacy rate is below the national average of 74.04% and although its female literacy rate is the lowest in the country, the state has been praised for its efforts and achievements in raising literacy rates. | Did the male or female population have a higher literacy rate in 1991? | {
"spans": [
"male"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2461 | e9d61fb4-942c-4831-a36e-127663c38c16 | In recent decades, the literacy rate of Rajasthan has increased significantly. In 1991, the states literacy rate was only 38.55% (54.99% male and 20.44% female). In 2001, the literacy rate increased to 60.41% (75.70% male and 43.85% female). This was the highest leap in the percentage of literacy recorded in India (the rise in female literacy being 23%). At the Census 2011, Rajasthan had a literacy rate of 67.06% (80.51% male and 52.66% female). Although Rajasthans literacy rate is below the national average of 74.04% and although its female literacy rate is the lowest in the country, the state has been praised for its efforts and achievements in raising literacy rates. | Did the male or female population have a higher literacy rate in 2001? | {
"spans": [
"male"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2461 | c28ddf72-3959-4b64-a59d-4d6945dee771 | In recent decades, the literacy rate of Rajasthan has increased significantly. In 1991, the states literacy rate was only 38.55% (54.99% male and 20.44% female). In 2001, the literacy rate increased to 60.41% (75.70% male and 43.85% female). This was the highest leap in the percentage of literacy recorded in India (the rise in female literacy being 23%). At the Census 2011, Rajasthan had a literacy rate of 67.06% (80.51% male and 52.66% female). Although Rajasthans literacy rate is below the national average of 74.04% and although its female literacy rate is the lowest in the country, the state has been praised for its efforts and achievements in raising literacy rates. | How many percentage points higher was the male literacy rate than the female in 2001? | {
"spans": [
"31.85"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2461 | cb0f9e08-975e-4b12-984b-0f0cf0fe91d5 | In recent decades, the literacy rate of Rajasthan has increased significantly. In 1991, the states literacy rate was only 38.55% (54.99% male and 20.44% female). In 2001, the literacy rate increased to 60.41% (75.70% male and 43.85% female). This was the highest leap in the percentage of literacy recorded in India (the rise in female literacy being 23%). At the Census 2011, Rajasthan had a literacy rate of 67.06% (80.51% male and 52.66% female). Although Rajasthans literacy rate is below the national average of 74.04% and although its female literacy rate is the lowest in the country, the state has been praised for its efforts and achievements in raising literacy rates. | By how many percentage points did the female literacy rate improve between 2001 and 2011? | {
"spans": [
"8.81"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2461 | c6f96480-d2fb-4d45-bb0d-66ca1938429c | In recent decades, the literacy rate of Rajasthan has increased significantly. In 1991, the states literacy rate was only 38.55% (54.99% male and 20.44% female). In 2001, the literacy rate increased to 60.41% (75.70% male and 43.85% female). This was the highest leap in the percentage of literacy recorded in India (the rise in female literacy being 23%). At the Census 2011, Rajasthan had a literacy rate of 67.06% (80.51% male and 52.66% female). Although Rajasthans literacy rate is below the national average of 74.04% and although its female literacy rate is the lowest in the country, the state has been praised for its efforts and achievements in raising literacy rates. | How many percent higher was the literacy rate of males than that of females in Rajasthan in 1991? | {
"spans": [
"34.55"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2461 | b0c02d46-ff5c-4797-93d7-da2895cc79bb | In recent decades, the literacy rate of Rajasthan has increased significantly. In 1991, the states literacy rate was only 38.55% (54.99% male and 20.44% female). In 2001, the literacy rate increased to 60.41% (75.70% male and 43.85% female). This was the highest leap in the percentage of literacy recorded in India (the rise in female literacy being 23%). At the Census 2011, Rajasthan had a literacy rate of 67.06% (80.51% male and 52.66% female). Although Rajasthans literacy rate is below the national average of 74.04% and although its female literacy rate is the lowest in the country, the state has been praised for its efforts and achievements in raising literacy rates. | How many more percent of females were literate in 2001 than had been literate in 1991? | {
"spans": [
"23.41"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2461 | 8b5fe7db-1a62-40bb-aa6d-84bf2fa0e8bc | In recent decades, the literacy rate of Rajasthan has increased significantly. In 1991, the states literacy rate was only 38.55% (54.99% male and 20.44% female). In 2001, the literacy rate increased to 60.41% (75.70% male and 43.85% female). This was the highest leap in the percentage of literacy recorded in India (the rise in female literacy being 23%). At the Census 2011, Rajasthan had a literacy rate of 67.06% (80.51% male and 52.66% female). Although Rajasthans literacy rate is below the national average of 74.04% and although its female literacy rate is the lowest in the country, the state has been praised for its efforts and achievements in raising literacy rates. | How many more percentage points of the male population was literate than the female population in 1991? | {
"spans": [
"34.55"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2461 | 931c2c24-8a02-484d-a7f7-fe2a74f8d35d | In recent decades, the literacy rate of Rajasthan has increased significantly. In 1991, the states literacy rate was only 38.55% (54.99% male and 20.44% female). In 2001, the literacy rate increased to 60.41% (75.70% male and 43.85% female). This was the highest leap in the percentage of literacy recorded in India (the rise in female literacy being 23%). At the Census 2011, Rajasthan had a literacy rate of 67.06% (80.51% male and 52.66% female). Although Rajasthans literacy rate is below the national average of 74.04% and although its female literacy rate is the lowest in the country, the state has been praised for its efforts and achievements in raising literacy rates. | How many more percentage points of the male population was literate than the female population in 2001? | {
"spans": [
"31.85"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2461 | 96bd303f-5fcd-46de-88d1-24c31e0bb51d | In recent decades, the literacy rate of Rajasthan has increased significantly. In 1991, the states literacy rate was only 38.55% (54.99% male and 20.44% female). In 2001, the literacy rate increased to 60.41% (75.70% male and 43.85% female). This was the highest leap in the percentage of literacy recorded in India (the rise in female literacy being 23%). At the Census 2011, Rajasthan had a literacy rate of 67.06% (80.51% male and 52.66% female). Although Rajasthans literacy rate is below the national average of 74.04% and although its female literacy rate is the lowest in the country, the state has been praised for its efforts and achievements in raising literacy rates. | By how many percentage points did the literacy rate increase between 1991 and 2001? | {
"spans": [
"21.86"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2461 | 4d18f5cd-370f-4a81-82db-eb42b5e5049c | In recent decades, the literacy rate of Rajasthan has increased significantly. In 1991, the states literacy rate was only 38.55% (54.99% male and 20.44% female). In 2001, the literacy rate increased to 60.41% (75.70% male and 43.85% female). This was the highest leap in the percentage of literacy recorded in India (the rise in female literacy being 23%). At the Census 2011, Rajasthan had a literacy rate of 67.06% (80.51% male and 52.66% female). Although Rajasthans literacy rate is below the national average of 74.04% and although its female literacy rate is the lowest in the country, the state has been praised for its efforts and achievements in raising literacy rates. | How many percentage points did the literacy rate increase between 2001 and 2011? | {
"spans": [
"6.65"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2461 | 0441eb78-f11f-41a6-abd4-4a19f7cdd61e | In recent decades, the literacy rate of Rajasthan has increased significantly. In 1991, the states literacy rate was only 38.55% (54.99% male and 20.44% female). In 2001, the literacy rate increased to 60.41% (75.70% male and 43.85% female). This was the highest leap in the percentage of literacy recorded in India (the rise in female literacy being 23%). At the Census 2011, Rajasthan had a literacy rate of 67.06% (80.51% male and 52.66% female). Although Rajasthans literacy rate is below the national average of 74.04% and although its female literacy rate is the lowest in the country, the state has been praised for its efforts and achievements in raising literacy rates. | How many percentage points did the women's literacy rate increase between 1991 and 2011? | {
"spans": [
"32.22"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2461 | bbfcaa24-7539-4d33-a207-5a6d65c69cee | In recent decades, the literacy rate of Rajasthan has increased significantly. In 1991, the states literacy rate was only 38.55% (54.99% male and 20.44% female). In 2001, the literacy rate increased to 60.41% (75.70% male and 43.85% female). This was the highest leap in the percentage of literacy recorded in India (the rise in female literacy being 23%). At the Census 2011, Rajasthan had a literacy rate of 67.06% (80.51% male and 52.66% female). Although Rajasthans literacy rate is below the national average of 74.04% and although its female literacy rate is the lowest in the country, the state has been praised for its efforts and achievements in raising literacy rates. | How many percentage points did the male literacy rate increase between 1991 and 2011? | {
"spans": [
"25.52"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2461 | 6c99d96c-680e-4983-9fc3-3a5c23ebfc95 | In recent decades, the literacy rate of Rajasthan has increased significantly. In 1991, the states literacy rate was only 38.55% (54.99% male and 20.44% female). In 2001, the literacy rate increased to 60.41% (75.70% male and 43.85% female). This was the highest leap in the percentage of literacy recorded in India (the rise in female literacy being 23%). At the Census 2011, Rajasthan had a literacy rate of 67.06% (80.51% male and 52.66% female). Although Rajasthans literacy rate is below the national average of 74.04% and although its female literacy rate is the lowest in the country, the state has been praised for its efforts and achievements in raising literacy rates. | How many percentage points higher was the Rajasthan literacy rate than the national average in 2011? | {
"spans": [
"6.98"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
nfl_1351 | f1795d73-7abb-4c3d-9ea8-8db7a93fbe52 | Following a close loss to the Colts the prior week, the much-hated Steelers came to town for a rematch of last year's AFC Championship Game. Steelers starting QB Ben Roethlisberger, who suffered a concussion in the previous week's overtime loss to the Chiefs did not start, and was the designated 3rd (emergency) quarterback. Backup Charlie Batch also was hurt in that game, which left 2nd-year QB Dennis Dixon, who previously had one pass in his NFL career, to start. The Steelers received the opening kickoff, but went three-and-out. On the ensuing possession, the Ravens drove down the field with ease, capping off their drive with a touchdown run by Willis McGahee. In the second quarter, Dixon hit WR Santonio Holmes on a play-action pass for a 33-yard TD, tying the game. The Ravens answered on the following drive, with a 52-yard strike from Joe Flacco to Mark Clayton, setting up a 10-yard touchdown pass to Derrick Mason. In the third quarter, on the Ravens opening possession, Mark Clayton made a 9-yard reception but fumbled the ball. The ball was kicked 20 yards towards the Steelers endzone by a Pittsburgh player, but recovered by Tyrone Carter. The Steelers drove, but were held to a field goal by Jeff Reed. Later in the 4th quarter, Joe Flacco was sacked by Lawrence Timmons and fumbled the ball, recovered by the Steelers near midfield. The drive resulted in a 24-yard run on a QB option by Dixon, giving the Steelers their first lead of the night. On the Ravens next possession, things were looking bad when the offense was facing a 3rd and 22 with around 3 minutes left. Joe Flacco completed a pass to Derrick Mason for 17 yards, leaving John Harbaugh with a critical decision. Harbaugh opted to go for it, and Joe Flacco found Ray Rice for a 44-yard reception, setting the Ravens up inside the Steeler 10-yard line with less than 2 minutes left. Billy Cundiff tied the game with a 24-yard field goal. On the following Steeler possession, Dennis Dixon was nearly intercepted by Lardarius Webb. The Steelers were forced to punt, giving the ball back to the Ravens with about 1:30 left in the game. A very good punt return into Steeler territory by Chris Carr was wiped off by a block in the back. Despite the setback, the Ravens managed to drive to the Steeler 40-yard line, where their drive stalled. On 3rd and 9 with 25 seconds left, Joe Flacco was sacked and fumbled, but the ball was recovered by Ben Grubbs. With the clock counting inside 10 seconds left and no timeouts, the field goal team managed to get into formation, and get the kick off. The 56 yard attempt by Billy Cundiff was dead center, but about 2 yards short. In overtime, the Steelers won the toss and got the ball, but were forced to punt. The Ravens, also forced to punt deep in their own territory, gave the ball to Pittsburgh around the Steeler 40-yard line. On a 3rd and 5, Dennis Dixon threw an interception to LB Paul Kruger, who returned the ball 26 yards to the Steeler 28-yard line. Already in field goal range, the Ravens ran the ball down to the Pittsburgh 11-yard line where Billy Cundiff made a 29-yard field goal to win the game. With the win, both teams' records is 6-5. The Ravens hold the final wild card seed in the AFC due to the head-to-head tiebreaker over Pittsburgh. | How many touchdowns did the Ravens score in the first quarter? | {
"spans": [
"1"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
nfl_1351 | 73036c32-9458-40fc-b801-598a96919300 | Following a close loss to the Colts the prior week, the much-hated Steelers came to town for a rematch of last year's AFC Championship Game. Steelers starting QB Ben Roethlisberger, who suffered a concussion in the previous week's overtime loss to the Chiefs did not start, and was the designated 3rd (emergency) quarterback. Backup Charlie Batch also was hurt in that game, which left 2nd-year QB Dennis Dixon, who previously had one pass in his NFL career, to start. The Steelers received the opening kickoff, but went three-and-out. On the ensuing possession, the Ravens drove down the field with ease, capping off their drive with a touchdown run by Willis McGahee. In the second quarter, Dixon hit WR Santonio Holmes on a play-action pass for a 33-yard TD, tying the game. The Ravens answered on the following drive, with a 52-yard strike from Joe Flacco to Mark Clayton, setting up a 10-yard touchdown pass to Derrick Mason. In the third quarter, on the Ravens opening possession, Mark Clayton made a 9-yard reception but fumbled the ball. The ball was kicked 20 yards towards the Steelers endzone by a Pittsburgh player, but recovered by Tyrone Carter. The Steelers drove, but were held to a field goal by Jeff Reed. Later in the 4th quarter, Joe Flacco was sacked by Lawrence Timmons and fumbled the ball, recovered by the Steelers near midfield. The drive resulted in a 24-yard run on a QB option by Dixon, giving the Steelers their first lead of the night. On the Ravens next possession, things were looking bad when the offense was facing a 3rd and 22 with around 3 minutes left. Joe Flacco completed a pass to Derrick Mason for 17 yards, leaving John Harbaugh with a critical decision. Harbaugh opted to go for it, and Joe Flacco found Ray Rice for a 44-yard reception, setting the Ravens up inside the Steeler 10-yard line with less than 2 minutes left. Billy Cundiff tied the game with a 24-yard field goal. On the following Steeler possession, Dennis Dixon was nearly intercepted by Lardarius Webb. The Steelers were forced to punt, giving the ball back to the Ravens with about 1:30 left in the game. A very good punt return into Steeler territory by Chris Carr was wiped off by a block in the back. Despite the setback, the Ravens managed to drive to the Steeler 40-yard line, where their drive stalled. On 3rd and 9 with 25 seconds left, Joe Flacco was sacked and fumbled, but the ball was recovered by Ben Grubbs. With the clock counting inside 10 seconds left and no timeouts, the field goal team managed to get into formation, and get the kick off. The 56 yard attempt by Billy Cundiff was dead center, but about 2 yards short. In overtime, the Steelers won the toss and got the ball, but were forced to punt. The Ravens, also forced to punt deep in their own territory, gave the ball to Pittsburgh around the Steeler 40-yard line. On a 3rd and 5, Dennis Dixon threw an interception to LB Paul Kruger, who returned the ball 26 yards to the Steeler 28-yard line. Already in field goal range, the Ravens ran the ball down to the Pittsburgh 11-yard line where Billy Cundiff made a 29-yard field goal to win the game. With the win, both teams' records is 6-5. The Ravens hold the final wild card seed in the AFC due to the head-to-head tiebreaker over Pittsburgh. | How many yards was the game winning field goal? | {
"spans": [
"29"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2584 | a440968e-f178-42ab-a5a3-d49c087c6765 | According to the 2011 census Russian citizens are the most numerous foreigners - 11 991, followed by 8 444 EU citizens (UK- 2 605, Greece - 1 253, Germany- 848, Poland - 819 and Italy - 456), citizens of Ukraine - 3 064, Republic of Macedonia - 1 091, Moldova - 893 and Serbia - 569. 22.8% of them are from Asia, mostly from Turkey. Those with dual Bulgarian and other citizenship were 22 152, or 0.3% of the population. Of them persons with Bulgarian and Russian citizenship were 5 257 (23.7%), followed by persons with Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship - 4 282 (19.3%), Bulgarian and citizenship of the USA- 1 725 (7.8%). There are at least 17,527 Refugees of the Syrian Civil War with applications in Bulgaria. In 2001-2015 185,447 people applied for Bulgarian citizenship and 116,222 were provided with. 113,647 were granted on grounds of proven Bulgarian ancestry, including 59,968 Republic of Macedonia citizens. 29,218 were Moldovan citizens, 5930 Ukrainians, 5374 Serbians, 5194 Russians, 3840 Israeli, 2192 Albanians, 692 Turks and others. In 2016, 12,880 foreigners were naturalized, including 6196 Macedonians. | Which make up the most foreigners, Russian citizens or the EU? | {
"spans": [
"Russian citizens"
],
"types": [
"span"
]
} |
history_2584 | ee71a474-7408-4d29-b6f1-9f6a893b5153 | According to the 2011 census Russian citizens are the most numerous foreigners - 11 991, followed by 8 444 EU citizens (UK- 2 605, Greece - 1 253, Germany- 848, Poland - 819 and Italy - 456), citizens of Ukraine - 3 064, Republic of Macedonia - 1 091, Moldova - 893 and Serbia - 569. 22.8% of them are from Asia, mostly from Turkey. Those with dual Bulgarian and other citizenship were 22 152, or 0.3% of the population. Of them persons with Bulgarian and Russian citizenship were 5 257 (23.7%), followed by persons with Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship - 4 282 (19.3%), Bulgarian and citizenship of the USA- 1 725 (7.8%). There are at least 17,527 Refugees of the Syrian Civil War with applications in Bulgaria. In 2001-2015 185,447 people applied for Bulgarian citizenship and 116,222 were provided with. 113,647 were granted on grounds of proven Bulgarian ancestry, including 59,968 Republic of Macedonia citizens. 29,218 were Moldovan citizens, 5930 Ukrainians, 5374 Serbians, 5194 Russians, 3840 Israeli, 2192 Albanians, 692 Turks and others. In 2016, 12,880 foreigners were naturalized, including 6196 Macedonians. | How many more Poland foreigners are there than Italians? | {
"spans": [
"363"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2584 | 03b5f1fd-4627-4c12-876a-3a016ec71f53 | According to the 2011 census Russian citizens are the most numerous foreigners - 11 991, followed by 8 444 EU citizens (UK- 2 605, Greece - 1 253, Germany- 848, Poland - 819 and Italy - 456), citizens of Ukraine - 3 064, Republic of Macedonia - 1 091, Moldova - 893 and Serbia - 569. 22.8% of them are from Asia, mostly from Turkey. Those with dual Bulgarian and other citizenship were 22 152, or 0.3% of the population. Of them persons with Bulgarian and Russian citizenship were 5 257 (23.7%), followed by persons with Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship - 4 282 (19.3%), Bulgarian and citizenship of the USA- 1 725 (7.8%). There are at least 17,527 Refugees of the Syrian Civil War with applications in Bulgaria. In 2001-2015 185,447 people applied for Bulgarian citizenship and 116,222 were provided with. 113,647 were granted on grounds of proven Bulgarian ancestry, including 59,968 Republic of Macedonia citizens. 29,218 were Moldovan citizens, 5930 Ukrainians, 5374 Serbians, 5194 Russians, 3840 Israeli, 2192 Albanians, 692 Turks and others. In 2016, 12,880 foreigners were naturalized, including 6196 Macedonians. | How many years accumulated to 185,447 people applying for Bulgarian citizenship? | {
"spans": [
"14"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2584 | a45669bf-b16a-4454-a0d6-394534a4035b | According to the 2011 census Russian citizens are the most numerous foreigners - 11 991, followed by 8 444 EU citizens (UK- 2 605, Greece - 1 253, Germany- 848, Poland - 819 and Italy - 456), citizens of Ukraine - 3 064, Republic of Macedonia - 1 091, Moldova - 893 and Serbia - 569. 22.8% of them are from Asia, mostly from Turkey. Those with dual Bulgarian and other citizenship were 22 152, or 0.3% of the population. Of them persons with Bulgarian and Russian citizenship were 5 257 (23.7%), followed by persons with Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship - 4 282 (19.3%), Bulgarian and citizenship of the USA- 1 725 (7.8%). There are at least 17,527 Refugees of the Syrian Civil War with applications in Bulgaria. In 2001-2015 185,447 people applied for Bulgarian citizenship and 116,222 were provided with. 113,647 were granted on grounds of proven Bulgarian ancestry, including 59,968 Republic of Macedonia citizens. 29,218 were Moldovan citizens, 5930 Ukrainians, 5374 Serbians, 5194 Russians, 3840 Israeli, 2192 Albanians, 692 Turks and others. In 2016, 12,880 foreigners were naturalized, including 6196 Macedonians. | How many of the 185447 refugees who applied for Bulgarian citizenship were granted citizenship? | {
"spans": [
"69225"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
history_2584 | 2cab4ed8-517a-467d-889e-538a301e22c2 | According to the 2011 census Russian citizens are the most numerous foreigners - 11 991, followed by 8 444 EU citizens (UK- 2 605, Greece - 1 253, Germany- 848, Poland - 819 and Italy - 456), citizens of Ukraine - 3 064, Republic of Macedonia - 1 091, Moldova - 893 and Serbia - 569. 22.8% of them are from Asia, mostly from Turkey. Those with dual Bulgarian and other citizenship were 22 152, or 0.3% of the population. Of them persons with Bulgarian and Russian citizenship were 5 257 (23.7%), followed by persons with Bulgarian and Turkish citizenship - 4 282 (19.3%), Bulgarian and citizenship of the USA- 1 725 (7.8%). There are at least 17,527 Refugees of the Syrian Civil War with applications in Bulgaria. In 2001-2015 185,447 people applied for Bulgarian citizenship and 116,222 were provided with. 113,647 were granted on grounds of proven Bulgarian ancestry, including 59,968 Republic of Macedonia citizens. 29,218 were Moldovan citizens, 5930 Ukrainians, 5374 Serbians, 5194 Russians, 3840 Israeli, 2192 Albanians, 692 Turks and others. In 2016, 12,880 foreigners were naturalized, including 6196 Macedonians. | How many more Ukrainians than Serbian with proven Bulgarian ancestry? | {
"spans": [
"736"
],
"types": [
"number"
]
} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.