text
stringlengths 0
118
|
---|
Closed-circuit television |
California v. Greenwood, 22 |
Canada, 68, 72, 134, 137, 156; privacy' in, 3; |
Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 72, 162, |
200nl5; PIPED A, 131 |
Canada Federal Court of Appeals, 134 |
Cardozo, Benjamin, 135 |
Cate, Fred, 5, 82-83 |
Caveli, Stanley, 43 |
CCTV. See Closed-circuit television |
Central dispositive factor, 188 |
Chastisement, 52 |
Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, |
128,135 |
Chile, 61 |
Chilling effects: individual/societal harms, |
178; surveillance creating, 193 |
Chinese society, 80-81 |
“Choosers,” 86 |
Clarke, Roger, 122, 193 |
Client/lawyer privilege, 227n70 |
Clinton, Bill, 24 |
Closed-circuit television (CCTV), 195-96 |
Coffin, Frank, 88 |
Cohen, Julie, 92, 143; on pervasive |
monitoring, 108 |
Collecting damages, 180 |
Columbia Law Review, 155 |
Common denominator: limited access to self |
as, 20; privacy, 20, 37; quest for, 43-44 |
Common good: individuality versus, 90; |
individualism and, 91 |
Common law, 16, 53, 137 |
Communications, 68,107,135,143,181; |
mail, 61-63; variability in, 61-65; telegraph, |
63; telephone, 63-64; patient, 227n70 |
Communitarianism, 90—91 |
Compulsion, 114 |
Compulsory privacy, 20 |
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 128 |
Computer Matching and Privacy Protection |
Act, 130 |
Comstock, Anthony, 56 |
Concealment, 20, 21; limited access to self |
and, 18-19; solitude versus, 18-19; of sex, |
55-56, 213n86 |
Conceptions: “closed by a frontier,” 43; |
fuzzy, 43 |
Conceptions of privacy, 6-8; control over |
personal information, 1, 13, 24-29, |
206n59; right to be let alone, 12, 15-18; |
Index |
249 |
limited access to self, 12-13, 18-21; |
intimacy, 13, 34-37; personhood, 13, |
27-34; secrecy, 13, 21-24 |
Conceptualizing privacy, 2, 13-14, 37—38, |
40, 49, 75, 209n3; traditional, 77; in |
information age, 171; need for, 197 |
Confidentiality, 150 |
Conformin', 94 |
Constitutional Court of South Africa, 68 |
Constitutional law, 2, 16-17 |
Constitutive privacy, 92 |
Consumer Protection Law (Brazil), 134 |
Consumer transactions, 89 |
Content, 137 |
Contextual integrity, 47-48 |
Contextual norms, 47 |
Contingency, universality versus, 66 |
Control: of body, 1,21 ln46; birth control, |
3; limited access to self as, 19; defining, |
27-28; social, 94, 174 |
Control over personal information, 1,13, |
206n59; as predominant theory, 24; scope |
of, 24-25; property and, 26-27; “all” |
control, 28; as broad/narrow/vague, 29 |
Cooley, Thomas, 16, 162, 168 |
Copyright law, 26 |
Council of Europe’s Convention for the |
Protection of Human Rights and |
Fundamental Freedoms, 124 |
Counterculture, 98 |
Courts, 7; Constitutional Court of South |
Africa, 68; Canada Federal Court of |
Appeals, 134; Germany Federal Supreme |
Court, 158; Japan Supreme Court, |
200nl5. See also European Court of |
Human Rights; U.S. Supreme Court |
Creative expression, 80, 98 |
Credit reporting, 119, 127 |
“Creeping totalitarianism," 32-33 |
C rim e Beat, 195 |
The Crucible (Miller), 158 |
Cultural differences, privacy problems and, |
183-87 |
“Curse of infamy,” 117 |
Czech Republic, 61 |
D aily Tim es Democrat v. G raham , 149 |
Daniels, Ruby Dee, 27-28 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.