Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
# Chomsky random text generator, version 1.1, Raymond Hettinger, 2005/09/13 | |
# https://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/440546 | |
""" | |
CHOMSKY is an aid to writing linguistic papers in the style | |
of the great master. It is based on selected phrases taken | |
from actual books and articles written by Noam Chomsky. | |
Upon request, it assembles the phrases in the elegant | |
stylistic patterns that Chomsky is noted for. | |
To generate n sentences of linguistic wisdom, type | |
(CHOMSKY n) -- for example | |
(CHOMSKY 5) generates half a screen of linguistic truth. | |
""" | |
leadins = """To characterize a linguistic level L, | |
On the other hand, | |
This suggests that | |
It appears that | |
Furthermore, | |
We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: | |
To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), | |
From C1, it follows that | |
For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in \ | |
application to be of any interest, | |
Analogously, | |
Clearly, | |
Note that | |
Of course, | |
Suppose, for instance, that | |
Thus | |
With this clarification, | |
Conversely, | |
We have already seen that | |
By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, | |
I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that | |
If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively \ | |
inaccessible to movement, | |
However, this assumption is not correct, since | |
Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in \ | |
(96) and (97), we see that | |
In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), | |
So far, | |
Nevertheless, | |
For one thing, | |
Summarizing, then, we assume that | |
A consequence of the approach just outlined is that | |
Presumably, | |
On our assumptions, | |
It may be, then, that | |
It must be emphasized, once again, that | |
Let us continue to suppose that | |
Notice, incidentally, that """ | |
# List of LEADINs to buy time. | |
subjects = """ the notion of level of grammaticalness | |
a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort | |
most of the methodological work in modern linguistics | |
a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds | |
the natural general principle that will subsume this case | |
an important property of these three types of EC | |
any associated supporting element | |
the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible \ | |
to ordinary extraction | |
the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition | |
the descriptive power of the base component | |
the earlier discussion of deviance | |
this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features | |
this selectionally introduced contextual feature | |
a descriptively adequate grammar | |
the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial | |
relational information | |
the systematic use of complex symbols | |
the theory of syntactic features developed earlier""" | |
# List of SUBJECTs chosen for maximum professorial macho. | |
verbs = """can be defined in such a way as to impose | |
delimits | |
suffices to account for | |
cannot be arbitrary in | |
is not subject to | |
does not readily tolerate | |
raises serious doubts about | |
is not quite equivalent to | |
does not affect the structure of | |
may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate | |
is not to be considered in determining | |
is to be regarded as | |
is unspecified with respect to | |
is, apparently, determined by | |
is necessary to impose an interpretation on | |
appears to correlate rather closely with | |
is rather different from""" | |
# List of VERBs chosen for autorecursive obfuscation. | |
objects = """ problems of phonemic and morphological analysis. | |
a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined \ | |
by the paired utterance test. | |
the traditional practice of grammarians. | |
the levels of acceptability from fairly high (e.g. (99a)) to virtual \ | |
gibberish (e.g. (98d)). | |
a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories. | |
a descriptive fact. | |
a parasitic gap construction. | |
the extended c-command discussed in connection with (34). | |
the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar. | |
the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon. | |
irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules. | |
nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. | |
a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar. | |
an abstract underlying order. | |
an important distinction in language use. | |
the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance \ | |
scope of a complex symbol. | |
the strong generative capacity of the theory.""" | |
# List of OBJECTs selected for profound sententiousness. | |
import random | |
import textwrap | |
from itertools import chain, islice | |
def generate_chomsky(times=5, line_length=72): | |
parts = [] | |
for part in (leadins, subjects, verbs, objects): | |
phraselist = list(map(str.strip, part.splitlines())) | |
random.shuffle(phraselist) | |
parts.append(phraselist) | |
output = chain.from_iterable(islice(zip(*parts), 0, times)) | |
print(textwrap.fill(" ".join(output), line_length)) | |
if __name__ == "__main__": | |
generate_chomsky() | |