11 1 34

Santiago Castro

bryant1410

https://santi.uy

AI & ML interests

Vision and Language, Humor, Sarcasm.

Recent Activity

reacted to rwightman's post with 🚀 about 1 month ago

Want to validate some hparams or figure out what `timm` model to use before commiting to download or training with a large dataset? Try mini-imagenet: https://huggingface.co/datasets/timm/mini-imagenet I had this sitting on my drive and forgot where I pulled it together from. It's 100 classes of imagenet, 50k train and 10k val images (from ImageNet-1k train set), and 5k test images (from ImageNet-1k val set). 7.4GB instead of > 100GB for the full ImageNet-1k. This ver is not reduced resolution like some other 'mini' versions. Super easy to use with timm train/val scripts, checkout the dataset card. I often check fine-tuning with even smaller datasets like: * https://huggingface.co/datasets/timm/resisc45 * https://huggingface.co/datasets/timm/oxford-iiit-pet But those are a bit small to train any modest size model w/o starting from pretrained weights.

View all activity

Organizations

bryant1410's activity

reacted to rwightman's post with 🚀 about 1 month ago

Post

1056

Want to validate some hparams or figure out what timm model to use before commiting to download or training with a large dataset? Try mini-imagenet: timm/mini-imagenet

I had this sitting on my drive and forgot where I pulled it together from. It's 100 classes of imagenet, 50k train and 10k val images (from ImageNet-1k train set), and 5k test images (from ImageNet-1k val set). 7.4GB instead of > 100GB for the full ImageNet-1k. This ver is not reduced resolution like some other 'mini' versions. Super easy to use with timm train/val scripts, checkout the dataset card.

I often check fine-tuning with even smaller datasets like:
* timm/resisc45
* timm/oxford-iiit-pet
But those are a bit small to train any modest size model w/o starting from pretrained weights.

reacted to rwightman's post with ❤️ 4 months ago

Post

1288

The timm leaderboard timm/leaderboard has been updated with the ability to select different hardware benchmark sets: RTX4090, RTX3090, two different CPUs along with some NCHW / NHWC layout and torch.compile (dynamo) variations.

Also worth pointing out, there are three rather newish 'test' models that you'll see at the top of any samples/sec comparison:
* test_vit ( timm/test_vit.r160_in1k)
* test_efficientnet ( timm/test_efficientnet.r160_in1k)
* test_byobnet ( timm/test_byobnet.r160_in1k, a mix of resnet, darknet, effnet/regnet like blocks)

They are < 0.5M params, insanely fast and originally intended for unit testing w/ real weights. They have awful ImageNet top-1, it's rare to have anyone bother to train a model this small on ImageNet (the classifier is roughly 30-70% of the param count!). However, they are FAST on very limited hadware and you can fine-tune them well on small data. Could be the model you're looking for?

reacted to rwightman's post with 🔥🚀 4 months ago

Post

2061

The latest timm validation & test set results are now viewable by a leaderboard space: timm/leaderboard

As of yesterday, I updated all of the results for ImageNet , ImageNet-ReaL, ImageNet-V2, ImageNet-R, ImageNet-A, and Sketch sets. The csv files can be found in the GH repo https://github.com/huggingface/pytorch-image-models/tree/main/results

Unfortunately the latest benchmark csv files are not yet up to date, there are some gaps in dataset results vs throughput/flop numbers impact the plots.

h/t to @MohamedRashad for making the first timm leaderboard.