text
stringlengths 14
24k
| entities
listlengths 0
68
|
---|---|
1
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore
Before Division Bench: Justice P.K. Jaiswal
Justice Alok Verma
Cr.A. No.717/2011
Shakir
vs
The State of Madhya Pradesh
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Presence :
For appellant : Shri Ashish Sharma, Advocate
For respondent : Shri Deepak Rawal, learned Dy.
A.G. for the respondent/State.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cr.A. No.601/2011
Shahadat
vs
The State of Madhya Pradesh
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Presence :
For appellant : Shri Gaurav Shrivastava, Advocate
For respondent : Shri Deepak Rawal, learned Dy.
A.G. for the respondent/State.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 54,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 17
},
{
"end": 109,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 97
},
{
"end": 161,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 151
},
{
"end": 258,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 252
},
{
"end": 347,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 324
},
{
"end": 519,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 506
},
{
"end": 592,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 580
},
{
"end": 875,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 867
},
{
"end": 964,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 941
},
{
"end": 1141,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1123
},
{
"end": 1214,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1202
}
] |
Petitioner:
Union Of India
Vs.
Respondent:
Ram Charan & Others
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 26,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 56,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 46
}
] |
Case No.:
Appeal (crl.) 1315 of 2005
Petitioner:
Nallapati Sivaiah
Respondent:
Sub-Divisional Officer, Guntur, A.P.
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 68,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 51
},
{
"end": 118,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 82
}
] |
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated : 02..12..2006
C O R A M
The Honourable Mrs. Justice Prabha Sridevan
Writ Petition Nos.23581 to 23584 of 2006
Selvi J. Jayalalitha .. Petitioner in
W.P. No.23581 of 2006
V.K. Sasikala .. Petitioner in
W.P. No.23582 of 2006
M/s. Sasi Enterprises,
14, Parsn Manere,
602, Anna Salai,
Chennai-6, rep. by its .. Petitioner in W.P. Nos.
Partner V.K. Sasikala. 23583 and 23584 of 2006
Versus
1. The Union of India,
Rep. by its Secretary,
Finance Department,
North Block,
New Delhi-110 001.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Central Circle Ii(2),
Chennai-34.
3. The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax,
Central Circle Ii(2), .. Respondents in
Chennai-34. all the Writ Petitions
- - - - -
Prayer : Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to issue writs of declaration to declare that Section 278E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is ultra vires, illegal, unreasonable and unconstitutional, repugnant to the Constitution of India.
- - - - -
For Petitioners : Mr. Guru Krishnakumar and
Mr. Subramanium Prasad for
Mr. N. Jothi, Assisted by
Mr. L.G. Shanmugha Sundaram,
Mr. A. Kandasamy and
Mr. V. Karthikeyan.
For Respondents : Mr. Gopal Subramaniam,
Additional Solicitor General of India,
Assisted by Mr. K. Ramasamy,
Senior Public Prosecutor for I.T. Cases,
Mr. S. Rajappa and
Mr. P. Wilson, Asst. Solicitor General of India.
- - - - -
O R D E R
| [
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 120,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 105
},
{
"end": 188,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 168
},
{
"end": 254,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 241
},
{
"end": 328,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 312
},
{
"end": 510,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 496
},
{
"end": 683,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 613
},
{
"end": 750,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 692
},
{
"end": 1170,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1153
},
{
"end": 1210,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1192
},
{
"end": 1241,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1233
},
{
"end": 1296,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1273
},
{
"end": 1327,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1315
},
{
"end": 1363,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1349
},
{
"end": 1421,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1404
},
{
"end": 1517,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1506
},
{
"end": 1602,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1592
},
{
"end": 1631,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1622
}
] |
Case No.:
Appeal (civil) 8161-8162 of 2003
Appeal (civil) 8163-8164 of 2003
Petitioner:
Union of India and Anr.
Respondent:
Azadi Bachao Andolan and Anr.
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 106,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 91
},
{
"end": 154,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 134
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated:- 12.10.2006
Coram:-
The Honourable Mr. Justice P.Sathasivam
and
The Honourable Mr. Justice S.Manikumar
Crl.O.P. No.21432 of 2002
Manjula ... Petitioner
vs.
M/s.Colgate Palmolive (India)
Limited, represented by
its authorised signatory
T.Harikumar. ... Respondent
Criminal Original Petition filed to call for the records relating to Cc No.1130 of 2002, on the file of the Viii Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai, and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Kannan
For Respondent : Mr.M.L.Joseph,
for M/s.Surana & Surana
Mr.M.Babu Muthu Meeran, Additional Public Prosecutor, to assist the Court.
- - - - -
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 111,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 99
},
{
"end": 154,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 143
},
{
"end": 192,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 185
},
{
"end": 242,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 225
},
{
"end": 549,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 541
},
{
"end": 583,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 573
},
{
"end": 639,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 620
}
] |
Petitioner:
Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia
Vs.
Respondent:
State Of Bihar And Others
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 33,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 16
},
{
"end": 67,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 53
}
] |
Pvr 1/17 apl23-13-wp3739-11grp.sxw
In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay
Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction
Criminal Writ Petition No.3739 Of 2011
Shyambahadur Purshottam Sharma. ...Petitioner
vs.
1.Shri.Sudhakar Narshu Poojary.
2.State of Maharashtra ...Respondents
With
Criminal Writ Petition No.3740 Of 2011
Shyambahadur Purshottam Sharma. ...Petitioner
vs.
1.Shri.Sudhakar Narshu Poojary.
2.State of Maharashtra ...Respondents
With
Criminal Writ Petition No.3741 Of 2011
Shyambahadur Purshottam Sharma. ...Petitioner
vs.
1.Shri.Bhupen Tokarshi Gala
2.State of Maharashtra ...Respondents
With
Criminal Writ Petition No.3742 Of 2011
Shyambahadur Purshottam Sharma. ...Petitioner
vs.
1.Shri.Bhupen Tokarshi Gala
2.State of Maharashtra ...Respondents
With
Criminal Application u/Sec.482 No.23 Of 2013
and
Criminal Application u/Sec.482 No.24 Of 2013
Deepak Sevantilal Javeri ...Applicant
vs.
1.M/s.Alpha Exports
2.The State of Maharashtra ...Respondents
---
Pvr 2/17 apl23-13-wp3739-11grp.sxw
Mr.Niranjan Mundargi @ Mr.H.H.Nagi i/b. M/s.H.H.Nagi & Associates, for
Petitioner in W.P.nos.3739 of 2011 to 3742 of 2011.
Mr.Ashish Mehta @ Mr.Mehul A.Rathod, for the Applicant in Apl nos.23 of 2013
and 24 of 2013.
Mr.Jatin P.Shah, for Respondent no.1 in W.P.nos.3739 of 2011 to 3742 of 2011.
Mr.Hemant Jain - in person- Representative of Respondent no.1-M/s.Alpha
Exports present in Court in Apl nos.23/2013 & 24/2013.
Mr.A.R.Patil, App for State-Respondent no.2.
Mr.Murtaza Najmi, Amicus Curie.
---
ig Coram : K.U.Chandiwal, J.
Reserved On : 22nd August, 2013.
Pronounced On : 23rd August, 2013
---
Judgment | [
{
"end": 127,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 93
},
{
"end": 401,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 371
},
{
"end": 484,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 461
},
{
"end": 512,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 490
},
{
"end": 737,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 707
},
{
"end": 865,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 842
},
{
"end": 922,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 900
},
{
"end": 1123,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1093
},
{
"end": 1217,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1197
},
{
"end": 1244,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1222
},
{
"end": 1435,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1405
},
{
"end": 1515,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1495
},
{
"end": 1542,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1520
},
{
"end": 1818,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1794
},
{
"end": 1895,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1882
},
{
"end": 1926,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1906
},
{
"end": 2165,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2148
},
{
"end": 2179,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2171
},
{
"end": 2378,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2366
},
{
"end": 2398,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2384
},
{
"end": 2542,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2530
},
{
"end": 2624,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2613
},
{
"end": 2819,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2810
},
{
"end": 2873,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2860
},
{
"end": 3059,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 3046
}
] |
Petitioner:
S. L. Goswami
Vs.
Respondent:
State Of Madhya Pradesh
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 27,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 70,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 47
}
] |
Fir No. 124/06
State Vs. Sunil Kumar
U/s. 279/304A Ipc & 185 Mv Act
Ps: Keshav Puram
In The Court Of Sh. Viplav Dabas Mm4(North West) Rohini
Courts Delhi
Fir No. 124/06
State Vs. Sunil Kumar
U/s. 279/304A Ipc & 185 Mv Act
Ps: Keshav Puram
Case Id No. 02404R0381922006
Date of Institution of case : 21.12.2006
Date of Judgment : 31.10.2014
Judgment | [
{
"end": 93,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 88
},
{
"end": 109,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 98
},
{
"end": 349,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 337
},
{
"end": 436,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 350
},
{
"end": 582,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 577
},
{
"end": 598,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 587
}
] |
The Honble Sri Justice U. Durga Prasad Rao
M.A.C.M.A No.3149 of 2009
28-04-2014
United India Insurance Co. Ltd..... Appellant
Y.Padmaja Vani and others.. Respondents
Counsel for Appellant : Sri V. Sambasiva Rao
Counsel for Respondent No.3: Sri Posani Venkateswarlu
<Gist:
>Head Note:
? Cases referred:
1)2001 (1) Alt 495
2)2014(1) Ald 111 (Sc)
3)2011 (6) Alt 321 = Laws (Aph) 2010-7-52
4)Laws (Sc) 2013-8-57
5)(2002) 7 Supreme Court Cases 456
6) Air 2012 Sc 86
The Honble Sri Justice U. Durga Prasad Rao
M.A.C.M.A. No.3149 of 2009
Judgment | [
{
"end": 42,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 23
},
{
"end": 127,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 97
},
{
"end": 166,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 152
},
{
"end": 242,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 226
},
{
"end": 298,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 278
},
{
"end": 552,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 533
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated : 22-08-2008
Coram
The Honourable Mr. Justice P.K. Misra
And
The Honourable Mr. Justice K. Mohan Ram
O.S.A.NOs.377 & 378 Of 2001
M/s. Perfect Automotive Components,
216, Hans Bhawan,
Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg,
New Delhi 110 002. .. Appellant in
OSA.No.377 of 2001
M/s. Pricol Lubricants (India)
Pvt. Ltd.,
216, Hans Bhawan,
Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg,
New Delhi 110 002. .. Appellant in
OSA.No.378 of 2001
Vs.
M/s. Premier Instruments & Controls Ltd.,
No.6, Church Lane, Ritherdon Road,
Vepery, Madras 7. .. Respondent in both OSAs Appeals filed under Order 36 Rule 1 of the O.S. Rules and Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the common judgment dated 3.2.2000 passed in C.S.Nos.534 & 535 of 1993 passed by the learned single Judge.
For Appellant in : M/s.V. Nataraj
both OSAs B. Giridhar Rao
For Respondent in
both OSAs : Mrs. Gladys Daniel
- - -
Common Judgment
| [
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 109,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 99
},
{
"end": 153,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 141
},
{
"end": 218,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 189
},
{
"end": 377,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 341
},
{
"end": 544,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 509
},
{
"end": 912,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 897
},
{
"end": 969,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 956
}
] |
Reportable
In The Supreme Court Of India
Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction
Criminal Appeal No.2094 Of 2011
(Arising out of Slp (Crl.) No.9919 of 2010)
Shiji @ Pappu and Ors. ...Appellants
Versus
Radhika and Anr. ...Respondents
J U D G M E N T
| [
{
"end": 64,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 42
},
{
"end": 257,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 244
},
{
"end": 346,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 339
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Patna
Second Appeal No.33 of 2007
Against the judgment and decree dated 13.11.2006 passed by the
learned Additional District Judge - 7th Patna in Title Appeal No. 60
of 2006 dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment and
decree dated 3.5.2006 passed by Sub Judge-3rd, Patna in Title Suit
No. 69 of 2006.
===========================================================
Dilip Gupta & Anr.
.... .... Plaintiffs-Appellants-Appellants
Versus
Debashish Palit & Ors.
.... .... Defendants-Defendants-Respondents
===========================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellants : Mr. J.S. Arora, Advocate.
Mr. Bhuwaneshwar Prasad, Advocate.
For respondent No.1. : Mr. Ganpati Trivedi, Advocate.
Mr. Madan Mohan, Advocate.
Mr. R. K. Sinha No.2, Advocate.
Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, Advocate.
For respondent Nos. 10, 11 & 12 : Mr. Siddheshwari Prasad Sinha, Sr. Advocate.
Mr. Srinandan Prasad Singh, Advocate.
Mr. Krishan Kumar Sinha, Advocate with him.
===========================================================
Coram: Honourable Mr. Justice Mungeshwar Sahoo
Cav Judgment | [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 522,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 511
},
{
"end": 705,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 690
},
{
"end": 948,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 938
},
{
"end": 1021,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1002
},
{
"end": 1102,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1087
},
{
"end": 1178,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1167
},
{
"end": 1254,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1243
},
{
"end": 1342,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1324
},
{
"end": 1434,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1409
},
{
"end": 1526,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1504
},
{
"end": 1611,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1592
},
{
"end": 1759,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1743
}
] |
Petitioner:
Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd.
Vs.
Respondent:
Commr. Of Income Tax, West Bengal, Calcutta
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 36,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 99,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 56
}
] |
:1:
In The High Court Of Karnataka At Bangalore
Dated This The 27Th Day Of June 2012
Before
The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice K.N.Keshavanarayana
MFA.No.11358 Of 2008 (Mv) C/w
MFA.No.1397 Of 2009 (Mv)
In MFA.No.11358/08
Between:
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co.Ltd.,
No.105-A to 107-A, Cears Plaza,
136, Residency Road,
Bangalore-560 025.
Represented by its Senior Legal Executive
Smt.Geetha Raj, R.O.
Bangalore. ... Appellant
[By Sri.D.Vijaya Kumar, Advocate]
And:
1. Sri.B.R.Basavaraj,
S/o Rudrappa Banakar,
Aged about 35 years,
Ayurvedic Doctor, (B.H.M.S.)
Residing at Kundur Village,
Honnali Taluk.
2. Sri.Shivappa.B.,
S/o Bharamappa,
Aged about 43 years,
Residing at Bisleri Village,
Davangere Taluk.
:2:
3. Sri.H.Mallikarjuna,
S/o G.Halappa,
Aged about 38 years,
Residing at Lokikere Village,
Near Vijaya Bank,
Davangere Taluk.
(Owner of M.C) ....Respondents
[By Sri.V.Mahesha, Advocate for R-1;
Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are served but unrepresented]
This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under
Section 173 (1) of Mv Act, against the judgment and
award dated 25.10.2008 passed in Mvc No.189/2006
(Old No.641/2006) on the file of the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn)
and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Harihar, awarding
a compensation of Rs.2,01,000/- with interest at 6%
p.a. from the date of petition till payment.
In MFA.No.1397/09
Between:
B.R.Basavaraj,
S/o Rudrappa Banakar,
Aged about 34 years,
Ayurvedic Doctor, (B.H.M.S.)
Residing at Kundur Village,
Honnali Taluk,
Davanagere. ....Appellant
[By Sri.V.Mahesha for Sri.A.Hanumanthappa,
Advocates]
:3:
And:
1. Shivappa.B.,
S/o Bharamappa,
Driver of Motor Bike
Bearing No.KA-17/V-632,
Hero Honda Splendor,
Residing at Bisleri Village,
Davangere.
2. H.Mallikarjuna,
S/o Halappa,
Aged Major,
Residing at Lokikere Village,
Near Vijaya Bank,
Davangere Taluk.
(Owner of the vehicle Bearing
No.KA-17/V-632, Hero Honda Splendor)
3. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co.Ltd.,
No.105-A, I Floor, Cears Plaza,
136, Residency Road,
Bangalore. ...Respondents
[By Sri.D.Vijaya Kumar, Advocate for R-3;
Respondent No. 2 is served and unrepresented;
Notice to R-1 is dispensed with vide order dated 6.3.2012]
This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under
Section 173 (1) of Mv Act, against the judgment and
award dated 25.10.2008 passed in Mvc No.189/2006
(Old No.641/2006) on the file of the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn)
and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Harihar, partly
allowing the claim petition for compensation and
seeking enhancement of compensation.
These Appeals coming for hearing on this day, the
court delivered the following:
:4:
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 52,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 16
},
{
"end": 183,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 164
},
{
"end": 337,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 302
},
{
"end": 554,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 540
},
{
"end": 598,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 585
},
{
"end": 773,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 762
},
{
"end": 941,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 927
},
{
"end": 1144,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1135
},
{
"end": 1624,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1611
},
{
"end": 1814,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1805
},
{
"end": 1838,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1823
},
{
"end": 1909,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1898
},
{
"end": 2097,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2083
},
{
"end": 2352,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2313
},
{
"end": 2496,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2482
}
] |
In The Court Of Ms. Vineeta Goyal, Additional District Judge
01, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi District, New Delhi
Rca No. 39/13
Unique Id no. 02403C0116362013
Dr. A.S. Beniwal
C/o Beniwal Clinic
Rz35/F, Dada Chhatariwala Marg,
New Delhi110045. ......... Appellant
Versus
Family Planning Assn. Of India
Through it's National President,
Bajaj Bhawan, Nariman Point,
Mumbai40021.
Also at
Fpai Bhawan, Sector Iv,
R.K. Puram,
New Delhi110022 .......Respondent
Petition presented On : 30.07.2013
Arguments Heard On : 27.10.2014
Judgment Pronounced On : 05.11.2014
Appearance : Sh. Ajay Chaudhary, counsel for the Appellant.
Sh. Asit Tiwari, counsel for the Respondent.
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 33,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 20
},
{
"end": 125,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 35
},
{
"end": 191,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 179
},
{
"end": 452,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 422
},
{
"end": 977,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 963
},
{
"end": 1062,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1051
}
] |
Petitioner:
The State Of Bombay And Another
Vs.
Respondent:
F.N. Balsara
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 31,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 16
},
{
"end": 76,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 64
}
] |
-:1:-
In The Court Of Ms. Manu Vedwan, Ld. Metropolitan
Magistrate : Special Court - 05 (Ni Act) : Dwarka : Delhi
Seniors Builders Ltd Vs. Shourya Towers Pvt Ltd & another
Complaint Case No. 97/14
P.S. : R. K. Puram
U/s. : 138 N.I.Act
J U D G M E N T
| [
{
"end": 44,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 33
},
{
"end": 126,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 46
},
{
"end": 149,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 129
},
{
"end": 176,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 154
}
] |
1
Reportable
In The Supreme Court Of India
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
Civil Appeal No. 5733 Of 2008
(Arising out of Slp [C] No.12056 of 2007)
National Insurance Co. Ltd. ... Appellant
Vs.
M/s. Boghara Polyfab Pvt. Ltd. ... Respondents
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 131,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 109
},
{
"end": 320,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 293
},
{
"end": 393,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 368
}
] |
In The Court Of Shri Ravinder SinghIi
Metropolitan Magistrate
Dwarka Courts, New Delhi
Case No. : 5051/14
Unique Case Id No. : 02405R0107502011
Om Parkash Bhardwaj
S/o Sh. Daya Kishan
R/o Wz199E, Raj Nagar,
PartII, Near Gupta Hardware,
Palam Colony,
New Delhi110045. .................................................Complainant
Versus
Geeta Rani
W/o Sh. Ashok Kumar
R/o Rz239D208A, Old Gurdwara
Dda Park Road, Raj Nagar PartII,
Palam Colony,
NewDelhi110045.
Also at:
Geeta Rani
W/o Ct. Ashok Kumar
Belt No. 3382/Dap, Pis No. 28031624,
First Batallian, Dcp Recruitment Cell,
New Police Line, Kingsway Camp, Delhi.
Also at:
C/o Sh. Ramesh
S/o Sh. Tek Chand
Village Chhoti Goond (Khark Boon),
Teshsil & Distt. Bhiwani, Haryana.
Also at:
C/o Sh. Anil Singh Namberdar
S/o Sh. Viza Singh
Village Kanti, Teshsil Narnaul,
Distt. Mahendergarh, Haryana........................................Accused
Date of Institution: 23.02.2011
Plea of the accused: Pleaded Not Guilty
Date of Reserving Judgment: 19/07/2014
Sentence or final Order: Convicted
Date of Judgment: 23/08/2014
Cc No. 5051/14 Om Parkash Bhardwaj Vs. Geeta Rani Page No. 13/13
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 38,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 21
},
{
"end": 135,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 63
},
{
"end": 214,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 195
},
{
"end": 447,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 437
},
{
"end": 1491,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1472
},
{
"end": 1506,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1496
}
] |
Before The Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court
Dated: 20/07/2011
Coram
The Honourable Mr. Justice Vinod K. Sharma
Writ Petition(MD)No.5859 of 2008
and
M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2009
M/s. Vicnivaas Agency,
289-D, Sivanthakulam Road,
Tuticorin - 628 003,
Represented by its Partner
Shri. T.P.S.Ponkumaran ...... Petitioner
Vs
1. Shri N. K. Raghupathi I.A.S.,
Now working as Additional Secretary &
Financial Adviser,
Department of Consumer Affairs,
Food & Public Distribution,
Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi - 110 001
Residing at C-Ii/80, Bapa Nagar,
New Delhi - 110 001.
2. The Union of India,
Represented by its Secretary to
the Government,
Department of Shipping (Ports Wing),
Ministry of Shipping,
Road Transport and Highways,
Parivahan Bhawan,
1, Parliament Street,
New Delhi - 110 001.
3. V O C Port Trust,
formerly Tuticorin Port Trust,
represented by its Chairman,
Tuticorin. ...... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
praying for issuance of a Writ of Declaration, (a) declaring that the actions of
the first respondent caused against the petitioner viz., demolishing their
property and suspension of stevedoring license are unlawful, ultra vires, mala
fide, arbitrary, unreasonable, unjust, perverse and vindictive, and therefore
violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and unconstitutional; (b) declaring that the
actions of the first respondent caused against the petitioner are in
contravention to the All India Service (Conduct) Rules 1968; (c) directing the
first respondent to pay Rs.3 crores with interest from this date to the
petitioner firm for causing monetary loss, harassment, mental agony, and
hardship; (d) directing the second respondent to take appropriate steps with the
concerned Government Departments for payment of the above amount to the
petitioner from the first respondent's account committing misuse of office and
abuse of power and for infringing the fundamental rights of the petitioner.
!For Petitioner ... Mr. N. Dilip Kumar
^For Respondents... Mr. V. T. Gopalan
Senior Counsel for
Mr. R. Sathish Kumar for R-1
Mr. K. K. Senthilvelan for R-2
Assistant Solicitor General of India
Mr. S. Yashwanth for R-3
- - - - - - - -
:Order | [
{
"end": 45,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 11
},
{
"end": 115,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 100
},
{
"end": 197,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 181
},
{
"end": 347,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 331
},
{
"end": 620,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 606
},
{
"end": 880,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 864
},
{
"end": 2090,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2076
},
{
"end": 2129,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2116
},
{
"end": 2182,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2166
},
{
"end": 2220,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2202
},
{
"end": 2296,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2284
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
WP(C).No. 1016 of 2010(B)
1. Mary Ulahannan, Proprietor,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. Union Of India,
... Respondent
2. State Of Kerala,
3. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.,
4. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.,
5. Bharath Petroleum Corporation Ltd.,
6. District Collector, Ernakulam.
7. Tahsildar, Muvattupuzha.
8. Executive Engineer,
For Petitioner :Sri.Alias M.Cherian
For Respondent :Sri.T.P.M.Ibrahim Khan,Asst.S.G Of Indi
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon
Dated :23/05/2011
O R D E R
(Cr.)
P.R. Ramachandra Menon J.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
W.P (C) Nos. 1016, 1017, 1564, 3349,
3360, 3371, 5895, 7362, 25211,
25590 27176, 27236, 30337, 30650,
30651, 33944, 37417, 38283 of 2010,
652, 656, 1254, 2159, 2427, 3373,
3471, 4071, 4863, 5034, 6257,
7159, 7197 of 2011
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dated, this the 23rd day of May, 2011
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 87,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 73
},
{
"end": 187,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 173
},
{
"end": 252,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 237
},
{
"end": 294,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 258
},
{
"end": 327,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 300
},
{
"end": 367,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 333
},
{
"end": 403,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 373
},
{
"end": 432,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 408
},
{
"end": 455,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 437
},
{
"end": 510,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 495
},
{
"end": 567,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 549
},
{
"end": 631,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 610
},
{
"end": 749,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 727
}
] |
Petitioner:
Pandurang Dhoni Chougule
Vs.
Respondent:
Maruti Hari Jadhav
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 36,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 74,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 56
}
] |
1
In The Court Of Ms. Barkha Gupta : Judge : Mact :
(North West District) Delhi
Mact No. : 112/08
Unique Id No. : 02404C0196292008
Amita Sharma w/o Sh. Sanjay Sharma,
R/o Wa19/20, Shakarpur, Delhi92. .....(Petitioner)
Versus
1. Sh.Virender Singh ... (he was the driver cum owner
of the offending vehicle/R1 who had
expired during trial and
following persons are impleaded
as his LRs).
a) Sumitra W/o Sh. Ishwar Singh
b) Mrs. Urmila W/o Late Virender Singh
c) Ms. Preeti D/o Late Virender Singh
d) Ms. Sushmita D/o Late Virender Singh
e) Master Tushant S/o Late Virender Singh
All R/o Village Jakhoda, Tehsil Bahadurgarh,
Distt. Jhajjar, Haryana.
(Respondent Nos. C to E are minors, who are being represented by their mother and natural guardian Mrs. Urmila)
2. The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.
Regd. Oriental House, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi110002. .......(Insurer/Respondent No.2) Mact No.112/08 Amita Sharma v. Sumitra 1 of 28 Other details: Date Of Institution : 30.01.2008 Date Of Reserving Order : 27.08.2014 Date Of Pronouncement :30.08.2014 Award/Judgment | [
{
"end": 36,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 24
},
{
"end": 170,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 158
},
{
"end": 331,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 317
},
{
"end": 1141,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1110
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature For Rajasthan At
Jaipur Bench Jaipur
1. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2772/2012
Ambuja Cements Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Commission
2. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2850/2007
Raj.Textile Mills Asso. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Commission
3. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5128/2007
M/s Shree Cement Ltd. V/s State of Rajasthan & ors.
4. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5270/2007
M/s Dcm Shriram . V/s State of Rajasthan & ors.
Consolidated Ltd.
Reportable
5. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5151/2008
M/s Binani Cement Ltd. V/s Union of India & ors.
6. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11285/2008
M/s J.K.Lakshmi Cement V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Ltd. Commission
7. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11288/2008
M/s Aditya Cement V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Commission
8. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7616/2009
M/s Manglam Cement Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Commission
9. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7622/2009
M/s Lucid Colloids Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Commission
10. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9781/2009
M/s Shriram Rayons Kota V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Commission
11. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9783/2009
Ambuja Cements Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Commission
12. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10219/2009
Grasim Industries Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Commission
13. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11072/2009
Hindustan Copper Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Commission
14. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11073/2009
J.K.Tyre & Industries Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Commission
15. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14510/2009
Chambal Fertilisers and V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Chemicals Ltd. Commission
16. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14575/2009
Grasim Industries Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Commission
17. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4589/2011
The Raj.Textile Mills Asso. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Commission
18. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6517/2011
M/s J.K.Lakshmi Cement V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Ltd. Commission
19. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6518/2011
Hindustan Cooper Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Commission
20. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6519/2011
Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Commission
21. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6520/2011
Chambal Fertilisers and V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Chemicals Ltd. Commission
22. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6521/2011
M/s Lucid Colloids Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Commission
23. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6877/2011
J.K.Tyre & Industries Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Commission
24. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7343/2011
Ultratech Cement Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Commission
25. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7344/2011
Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Commission
26. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10911/2011
M/s Hindustan Zinc Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Commission
27. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10912/2011
M/s Shriram Rayons Kota V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Commission
28. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10913/2011
M/s Manglam Cement Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory
Commission
Date when the order was
reserved :- 21.8.2012
Date of pronouncement of
order :- 31.8.2012
Present
Hon'ble the Chief Justice Mr.Arun Mishra
Hon'ble Mr.Justice Narendra Kumar Jain-I
Mr.P.N.Bhandari )
Mr.Kamlakar Sharma, Sr.Counsel with )
Ms.Alankrita Sharma )
Mr.Sudhir Gupta,Sr.Counsel with )-for the petitioners.
Mr.Sachin Mehta )
Mr.Virendra Lodha, Sr.Counsel with )
Mr.Ankit Jain )
Mr.Bipin Gupta )
Mr.Pradeep Kalwania )-for the respondents.
Order
| [
{
"end": 69,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 132,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 113
},
{
"end": 164,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 138
},
{
"end": 248,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 225
},
{
"end": 297,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 254
},
{
"end": 362,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 345
},
{
"end": 386,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 368
},
{
"end": 459,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 448
},
{
"end": 485,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 467
},
{
"end": 588,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 570
},
{
"end": 607,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 593
},
{
"end": 687,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 669
},
{
"end": 725,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 693
},
{
"end": 802,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 789
},
{
"end": 852,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 809
},
{
"end": 919,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 900
},
{
"end": 967,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 924
},
{
"end": 1034,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1015
},
{
"end": 1082,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1039
},
{
"end": 1150,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1131
},
{
"end": 1198,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1155
},
{
"end": 1262,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1243
},
{
"end": 1310,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1267
},
{
"end": 1379,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1356
},
{
"end": 1427,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1384
},
{
"end": 1494,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1472
},
{
"end": 1542,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1499
},
{
"end": 1615,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1588
},
{
"end": 1663,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1620
},
{
"end": 1728,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1709
},
{
"end": 1765,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1739
},
{
"end": 1863,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1840
},
{
"end": 1911,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1868
},
{
"end": 1981,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1959
},
{
"end": 2030,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1987
},
{
"end": 2097,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 2079
},
{
"end": 2150,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2103
},
{
"end": 2216,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 2195
},
{
"end": 2264,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2221
},
{
"end": 2331,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 2309
},
{
"end": 2379,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2336
},
{
"end": 2443,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 2424
},
{
"end": 2479,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2453
},
{
"end": 2581,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 2562
},
{
"end": 2629,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2586
},
{
"end": 2700,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 2674
},
{
"end": 2748,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2705
},
{
"end": 2815,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 2793
},
{
"end": 2863,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2820
},
{
"end": 2931,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 2908
},
{
"end": 2979,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2936
},
{
"end": 3047,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 3028
},
{
"end": 3095,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 3052
},
{
"end": 3164,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 3145
},
{
"end": 3213,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 3170
},
{
"end": 3282,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 3263
},
{
"end": 3330,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 3287
},
{
"end": 3507,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 3496
},
{
"end": 3547,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 3528
},
{
"end": 3566,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3554
},
{
"end": 3591,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3576
},
{
"end": 3630,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3614
},
{
"end": 3651,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3639
},
{
"end": 3708,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3696
},
{
"end": 3734,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3720
},
{
"end": 3768,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3758
},
{
"end": 3789,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3778
},
{
"end": 3815,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3799
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
Crl A No. 282 of 1999()
1. Gemini
... Petitioner
Vs
1. Chandran
... Respondent
For Petitioner :Sri.C.J.Joy
For Respondent :Public Prosecutor
The Hon'ble Mrs. Justice K.Hema
Dated :14/07/2006
O R D E R
K.Hema, J.
--------------------------------------------------
Crl. A. No. 282 Of 1999-B
--------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 14th day of July, 2006
J U D G M E N T
| [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 78,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 72
},
{
"end": 157,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 149
},
{
"end": 247,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 240
},
{
"end": 332,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 326
},
{
"end": 411,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 405
}
] |
Petitioner:
Workmen Of M/S Hindustan Lever Ltd. & Ors.
Vs.
Respondent:
Management Of M/S Hindusian Lever Ltd.
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 47,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 112,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 74
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Patna
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7321 of 2015
===========================================================
Rakesh Kumar Sah Son of Gajendra Prasad Sah, resident of village- Roshana Bazar, Post Office + Police Station- Pranpur, District- Katihar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Petroleum & Natural Gas, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi
2. The Secretary, Department of Petroleum & Natural Gas, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi
3. The Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Corporate Office, lot No. 3079/3, Sadia Nagar, J.B. Tito Marg, New Delhi- 110049 through its Chairman
4. The Chairman, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Corporate Office, lot No. 3079/3, Sadia Nagar, J.B. Tito Marg, New Delhi- 110049
5. The Director (Marketing), Indian Oil Corporation Limited, G-9, Ali Yavar Jung Marg, Bandra (East), Mumbai- 400051
6. The General Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Marketing Division), Bihar State Office, Loknayak Jaiprakash Bhawan (5th Floor), Dak Bunglow Chowk, Patna- 800001
7. The Senior Divisional Sales Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, (Marketing Division), Begusarai Divisional Office, P.O. Barauni Oil Refinery, District- Begusarai (Bihar) 851114
8. The Manager (Refinery Coordination) Barauni Marketing Terminal, Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Marketing Division), Begusarai, Bihar- 854114
9. The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Katihar
10. The District Magistrate Katihar
11. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Katihar
12. The Circle Officer, Pranpur, District- Katihar
13. Sri Satish Prasad, son of not known the then Circle Officer, Pranpur, District-
Katihar
14. Sri Binod Kumar Gupta, son of Rameshwar Lal Gupta, of Village- Mahadeopur, P.O.- Mahadeopur, P.S.- Pranpur, District- Katihar
15. Sri Jeewan Lal Agarwal, Son of Biseshwar Lal Agrawal, resident of village-
Mahadeopur, P.O. Mahadeopur, P.S.- Pranpur, District- Katihar .... .... Respondent/s with =========================================================== Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9456 of 2015 =========================================================== Jiwan Lal Agrawal Son of Sri Biseshwar Lal Agrawal, resident of Village + P.O.-
Mahadevpur, P.S.- Pranpur, District- Katihar.
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus
1. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Corporate Office, Lot No. 3079/3 Sadia Nagar, J.B. Tito Marg, New Delhi-110049 through its Chairman.
2. The Chairman, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Corporate Office, Lot No. 3079/3, New Delhi-110049.
3. The Director (Marketing), Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Indian Oil Bhawan, G-9, Patna High Court Cwjc No.7321 of 2015 dt.18-09-2017 2 Aliyavar Jung Marg, Bandar (East), Mumbai- 400051.
4. The General Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (Marketing Division), Bihar State Office, Lok Nayak Jaiprakash Bhawan, 5th Floor, Dak Bunglow Chowk, Patna-800001.
5. The Chief Manager (R.S.), Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Bihar State Office, Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Bhawan 5th, Floor, Dak Banglow Chowk, Patna.
6. The Senior Divisional Sales Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.(Marketing Division), Begusarai Divisional office, P.O.- Barauni Oil Refinary, District- Begusarai (Bihar).
7. The Manager (Reginary Coordination), Barauni Marketing Terminal, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.(Marketing Division), Begusarai (Bihar).
8. The Circle Officer, Bihar, Patna.
9. Binod Kumar Gupta Son of not known, resident of Village + P.O. Mahadevpur, P.S.- Pranpur, District- Katihar.
10. Rakesh Kumar Sah Son of Gajendra Prasad Sah, resident of Roshana Bazar, P.O. + P.S.- Pranpur, District- Katihar .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
(In Cwjc No.7321 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Piyush Saurav, Adv.
For the Iocl : Mr. Anil Kumar Jha, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Sanat Kr. Misha, Adv.
For the Resp. No.14 : Mr. Dhirendra Kr. Jha, Adv.
Mr. Jibendra Mishra, Adv.
For the Resp. No.15 : Mr. Bhola Prasad, Adv.
Mr. Mukesh Kr. Jha, Adv.
Mr. Rajendra Narayan, Adv.
For the State : Mr. S.S. Prasad- Sc8
Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Ac to Sc-8
(In Cwjc No.9456 of 2015)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajendra Narayan, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Mukesh Kr. Jha, Adv.
Mr. Bhola Prasad, Adv.
For Ioc : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Adv.
Mr. Amlesh Kumar Verma, Adv.
For the Resp. No. 9 : Mr. Dhirendra Kr. Jha, Adv.
For the State : Mr. Binay Kumar, Ac to Sc-10
=========================================================== Coram: Honourable Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey Oral Judgment | [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 180,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 164
},
{
"end": 353,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 339
},
{
"end": 524,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 449
},
{
"end": 562,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 532
},
{
"end": 795,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 673
},
{
"end": 912,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 803
},
{
"end": 1082,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 920
},
{
"end": 1267,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1090
},
{
"end": 1412,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1275
},
{
"end": 1434,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1420
},
{
"end": 1511,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1484
},
{
"end": 1558,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1520
},
{
"end": 1609,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1567
},
{
"end": 1631,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1618
},
{
"end": 1728,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1711
},
{
"end": 1859,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1841
},
{
"end": 2186,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 2169
},
{
"end": 2358,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2331
},
{
"end": 2559,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2469
},
{
"end": 2659,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2569
},
{
"end": 2917,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2758
},
{
"end": 3063,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2928
},
{
"end": 3241,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 3075
},
{
"end": 3379,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 3253
},
{
"end": 3420,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 3392
},
{
"end": 3445,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 3428
},
{
"end": 3560,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 3544
},
{
"end": 3826,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3806
},
{
"end": 3853,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3840
},
{
"end": 3916,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3902
},
{
"end": 3983,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3968
},
{
"end": 4048,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4031
},
{
"end": 4111,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4096
},
{
"end": 4171,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4159
},
{
"end": 4233,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4219
},
{
"end": 4297,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4281
},
{
"end": 4357,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4345
},
{
"end": 4416,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4404
},
{
"end": 4510,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4494
},
{
"end": 4542,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4528
},
{
"end": 4568,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4556
},
{
"end": 4634,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4618
},
{
"end": 4700,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4682
},
{
"end": 4765,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4748
},
{
"end": 4824,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4813
},
{
"end": 4943,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 4929
}
] |
W.P.1342/15 1
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
Bench At Gwalior
Justice Sujoy Paul.
Writ Petition No.1342/15
Jai Prakash Agrawal
Vs.
Anand Agrawal & Ors.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri D.D.Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri K.S.Tomar, Senior Advocate with Shri J.S.Kaurav, Advocate
for respondents No. 1 to 3.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order
| [
{
"end": 137,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 64
},
{
"end": 180,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 170
},
{
"end": 282,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 263
},
{
"end": 365,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 352
},
{
"end": 476,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 466
},
{
"end": 521,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 512
},
{
"end": 559,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 549
}
] |
Petitioner:
Shyam Sunder Agarwal & Co.
Vs.
Respondent:
Union Of India.
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 38,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 72,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 58
}
] |
1
R
In The High Court Of Karnataka At Bangalore
Dated This The 7th Day Of December 2012
Before
The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar
M.F.A.No.7665 Of 2008 (Mv)
C/W
M.F.A No.491 Of 2009(Mv)
Mfa.No.7665 Of 2008
Between:
Bangalore Metropolitan
Transport Corporation
Central Office
K.H. Double Road
Shanthinagar
Bangalore
By Its Managing Director ...Appellant
(By Sri: D. Vijayakumar, Adv., )
And:
1. Sri. B.N. Nagesh
S/O. Sri. Narasimha Shastry
Aged About 52 Years
2. Smt. Kamala
W/O. Sri B.N. Nagesh
Aged About 47 Years
2
Both Are R/O. No.18/450
Neera Ganthi Street
Ananthapura Old Town
Koteshwara Rao
Andhrapradesh .....Respondents
(By Sri: R. Chandrashekar, Adv., For M/S Lawyers
Net, For R1 & 2)
--------
This Mfa Is Filed Under Section 173(1) Of M.V.
Act Against The Judgment And Award Dated
28.3.2008 Passed In Mvc No.4185/2006 On The File Of
The Vi Addl. Judge, Court Of Small Causes,
Member, Mact, Metropolitan Area, Bangalroe
(Scch.No.2), Awarding A Compensation Of
Rs.9,15,000/- With Interest At 7% P.A. From The Date
Of Petition Till Deposit.
M.F.A.No.491 Of 2009
Between:
1. B.N. Nagesh
S/O. Narasimha Shastry
Aged About 53 Years
2. Kamala
W/O. B.N. Nagesh
Aged About 48 Years
Both Are R/O. No.18/450
Neera Ganthi Street
Ananthapura Old Town
Koteshwara Rao
Andhrapradesh ......Appellants
3
(By Sri: R. Chandrashekar, Adv., Form/S. Lawyers
Net,)
And:-
The Managing Director
B.M.T.C
K.H. Road
Shanthinagar
Bangalore-560 027. .....Respondent
(By Sri: D. Vijaykumar, Adv.,)
--------
This Mfa Is Filed Under Section 173(1) Of M.V.
Act Against The Judgment And Award Dated
28.3.2008 Passed In Mvc No.4185/2006 On The File Of
The Vi Addl. Scj & Member, Mact, Bangalore Parly
Allowing The Claim Petition For Compensation And
Seeking Enhancement Of Compensation.
These MFAs Coming On For Admission This Day,
The Court Delivered The Following:
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 101,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 65
},
{
"end": 227,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 214
},
{
"end": 415,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 371
},
{
"end": 547,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 533
},
{
"end": 585,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 574
},
{
"end": 661,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 655
},
{
"end": 898,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 882
},
{
"end": 1384,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1373
},
{
"end": 1450,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1444
},
{
"end": 1592,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1579
},
{
"end": 1686,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1670
},
{
"end": 1796,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1729
},
{
"end": 1853,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1840
}
] |
Petitioner:
Consumer Education & Research Centre And Others
Vs.
Respondent:
Union Of India & Others
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 48,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 93,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 79
}
] |
Petitioner:
Tilokchand Motichand & Ors.
Vs.
Respondent:
H.B. Munshi & Anr.
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 32,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 70,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 59
}
] |
Petitioner:
Motor General Traders & Anr. Etc. Etc.
Vs.
Respondent:
State Of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. Etc. Etc.
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 33,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 93,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 70
}
] |
Case No.:
Appeal (crl.) 336 of 1996
Petitioner:
Uday
Respondent:
State of Karnataka
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 54,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 50
},
{
"end": 86,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 68
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
CRL.A.No. 1338 of 2010()
1. Sasikumar, Aged 42 Years,
... Petitioner
2. Gopi, Aged 48 Years, S/O.Krishnan,
Vs
1. The State Of Kerala,
... Respondent
For Petitioner :Sri.V.Sethunath
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.K.Mohanan
Dated :04/08/2011
O R D E R
V.K.Mohanan, J.
----------------------------------------
Crl.A.Nos. 1338 & 2198 of 2010
----------------------------------------
Dated this the 4th day of August, 2011
J U D G M E N T
| [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 81,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 72
},
{
"end": 143,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 139
},
{
"end": 227,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 212
},
{
"end": 322,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 311
},
{
"end": 408,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 397
},
{
"end": 479,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 468
}
] |
Petitioner:
Satyadhyan Ghosal And Others
Vs.
Respondent:
Sm. Deorajin Debi And Another.
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 29,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 77,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 64
}
] |
Appeal 991 Of 2008.doc
In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay
Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction
Criminal Appeal No.991 Of 2008
Yashwant Hiraman Thakare ... Appellant
v/s
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
----------------------------------
Mrs. Sonia Miskin, advocate appointed for Appellant.
Mrs. G. P. Mulekar, App for State.
----------------------------------
Coram: V.K.Tahilramani &
B.P. Colabawalla, Jj.
Reserved On : 7th May, 2015 Pronounced On : 8th May, 2015 Judgment | [
{
"end": 78,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 44
},
{
"end": 398,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 374
},
{
"end": 479,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 459
},
{
"end": 637,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 625
},
{
"end": 722,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 709
},
{
"end": 866,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 851
},
{
"end": 920,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 904
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
Bail Appl..No. 4229 of 2008()
1. Santhosh Madhavan @ Amrutha Chaithanya
... Petitioner
Vs
1. Circle Inspector Of Police
... Respondent
2. State Of Kerala, Rep. By Its
For Petitioner :Sri.S.Gopakumaran Nair (Sr.)
For Respondent :Public Prosecutor
The Hon'ble Mrs. Justice K.Hema
Dated :21/07/2008
O R D E R
| [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 115,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 77
},
{
"end": 214,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 188
},
{
"end": 278,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 263
},
{
"end": 348,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 330
},
{
"end": 439,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 433
}
] |
Petitioner:
Shankarsan Dash
Vs.
Respondent:
Union Of India
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 27,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 61,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 47
}
] |
In The Court Of Sh. Brijesh Kumar Garg;
Special Judge:Cbi01: Central: Delhi
Criminal Appeal No. 1/2014
Case Id No. 02401R0178422014
1. Prem Dutta
2. Smt. Santosh Dutta
W/o Sh. Prem Dutta
Both r/o Gf 13 B/1, Malka Ganj,
Delhi110 007
.......Appellants
Vs.
1. Monika Dutta,
W/o Sh. Punit Dutta,
R/o Ff 13 B/1, Malka Ganj,
New Delhi ........Respondent
Date of filing : 19.04.2014
Date of order: 23.07.2014
O R D E R
| [
{
"end": 38,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 20
},
{
"end": 86,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 50
},
{
"end": 160,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 150
},
{
"end": 182,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 169
},
{
"end": 385,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 373
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated: 08.04.2011
Coram:
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice T.S.Sivagnanam
W.P.Nos. 7609 of 2001 and 26466 of 2001
W.P.No.26466 of 2001
R.Ramakrishnan Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property,
New Delhi rep. by its Registrar,
4th Floor, Lok Nayak Bhavan,
Khan Market, New Delhi.
2.The Competent Authority,
Smugglers, Foreign Exchange
Manipulators (Forfeiture of
Properties) Act, 1976 and
Narcotic Drugs Psychotropic Substance Act,
69/1, G.N.Chetty Street,
Chennai 600017. RespondentsW.P.No.7609 of 2001 Mohammed Thaha Umma (Deceased)
1.S.S.A. Hayarunisha
2.S.S.A. Sheik Kamal
3.S.S.A. Aminath Fathima
4.S.S.A. Ayshath Zulaiha
5.S.S.A. Seyed Anifa
6.S.S.A. Husain Jalal
7.S.S.A. Kathija Rilwana
8.S.S.A. Basheer Petitioners P1 to P8 substituted as LRs in the place of the deceased petitioner vide court order dated 24.03.2011 in W.P.M.P.No.104/11.
Vs.
1.Competent Authoirty, Smugglers, Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Properties) Act, Chennai.
2.Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property,
New Delhi. Respondents
Prayer in W.P.No.26466 of 2001:- Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent dated 01.10.2001 in F.P.A.No.70/MDS/98 and the order of the second respondent dated 28.09.1998 in F.No.OCA/MDS/2846/94 and quash the same.
Prayer in W.P.No.7609 of 2001:- Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the second respondent the Appellate Tribunal for forfeited Property, New Delhi in the order dated 31.01.2001 made in FPA.No.66/MDS/95 confirming the findings of the Competent Authority, Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, Chennai in Oca/Mds/348-352/76 dated 02.02.2000 and quash the same.
For Petitioner :Mr.Rahul Balaji for M/s.Sathish Parasaran
in W.P.No.26466 of 2001
Mr.B.Kumar Senior counsel for R.Loganathan
in W.P.7609/01
For Respondents:Mr.M.L.Ramesh Senior Standing counsel for Rr1-2
Mr.S.Haja Mohideen Gisti Senior Standing counsel for Rr1-2
C O M M O N O R D E R | [
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 110,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 96
},
{
"end": 190,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 176
},
{
"end": 261,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 220
},
{
"end": 570,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 365
},
{
"end": 661,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 641
},
{
"end": 682,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 662
},
{
"end": 707,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 683
},
{
"end": 732,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 708
},
{
"end": 753,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 733
},
{
"end": 775,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 754
},
{
"end": 800,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 776
},
{
"end": 817,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 801
},
{
"end": 1067,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 964
},
{
"end": 1112,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1069
},
{
"end": 2027,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2015
},
{
"end": 2109,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2102
},
{
"end": 2189,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2179
},
{
"end": 2248,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2227
}
] |
Petitioner:
Mrs. Rekha Chaturvedi
Vs.
Respondent:
University Of Rajasthan And Ors.
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 34,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 18
},
{
"end": 77,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 54
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated: 25.07.2014
Coram
The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice V.Dhanapalan
and
The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice G.Chockalingam
C.M.A.No.3215 of 2013
and M.P.No.1 of 2013
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.,
Motor Third Party Claims Office,
No.45, Moore Street,
Chennai-600 001. ... Appellant / 2nd Respondent
-vs-
1. R.Kala
2. Minor R.Sudhan
3. Minor R.Edhan
4. Vellaithai
5. M.Muthu ... Respondents / Petitioners
6. P.Ramesh Kumar ... Respondent / 1st Respondent
Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act against the Decree and the judgment passed in M.C.O.P.No.4505 of 2006 dated 03.02.2012, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Small Causes Court, Chennai.
For Appellant : Mr.R.Neethi Perumal
For R1 to R5 : Mr.F.Terry Chellaraja
For R6 : Given Up
*****
J U D G M E N T
| [
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 101,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 89
},
{
"end": 143,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 129
},
{
"end": 221,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 193
},
{
"end": 341,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 335
},
{
"end": 359,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 351
},
{
"end": 376,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 369
},
{
"end": 390,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 380
},
{
"end": 401,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 394
},
{
"end": 449,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 435
},
{
"end": 773,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 757
},
{
"end": 813,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 795
}
] |
20
*In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi
+ MAC.APP.No.422/2009
Date of Decision: 23rd February, 2010
%
Sobat Singh ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Kishan Nautiyal, Advocate.
versus
Ramesh Chandra Gupta & Anr. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Atul Nanda, Ms. Rameeza,
Mr.Sumeer and Ms. Sugandha,
Advocates for Bajaj Allianz General
Insurance Co. Ltd. with Mr. Sanjay
Gupta, Manager.
Mr. Atul Nanda, Ms. Rameeza,
Mr.Sumeer and Ms. Sugandha,
Advocates for Icici Lombard General
Insurance Co. Ltd. with Mr.Gaurab
Gaba, Manager.
Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa and Ms. Harsh
Lata, Advocates for Oriental Insurance
Company Limited.
Ms. Anjali Bansal, Advocate for Tata
Aig General Insurance Co. Ltd., Bharti
Axa General Insurance Co. Ltd. and
Future Generali India Insurance Co.
Ltd.
Mr. Sunil Kapoor and Mr. Anuraj
Sharma, Advocates for Hdfc Ergo
General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Mr. S.L. Gupta, Advocate for National
Insurance Company with Mr. Santosh
K. Sood, Manager, Dro-I and Mr. N.
Wadhwan, Asst. Manager, Dro-Ii.
Ms. Adarsh Sabharwal, Adv. for
Raheja Qbe General Insurance Co.
Ltd.
Ms. Shantha Devi Raman with Mr.
Amit Maihen, Advocates for Iffco
Tokyo General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate for Reliance
General Insurance Co. Ltd., Universal
Sompo General Insurance co. Ltd. and
Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance
Co.Ltd.
Mr. Kanwal Choudahary, Adv. for R-2.
MAC.APP.No.422/2009 Page 1 of 21
Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate for United
Insurance Company with Mr. Harish
Choudhary, Deputy Manager and Mr.
Sanjeev Negi, Admn. Officer.
Mr. O.P. Mannie, Amicus Curiae.
Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate for
Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance
Co. Ltd.
Coram :-
The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice J.R. Midha
1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may Yes
be allowed to see the Judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes
3. Whether the judgment should be Yes
reported in the Digest?
Judgment | [
{
"end": 43,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 11
},
{
"end": 181,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 170
},
{
"end": 273,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 258
},
{
"end": 342,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 322
},
{
"end": 410,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 400
},
{
"end": 423,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 416
},
{
"end": 457,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 451
},
{
"end": 474,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 466
},
{
"end": 669,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 659
},
{
"end": 682,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 675
},
{
"end": 716,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 710
},
{
"end": 733,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 725
},
{
"end": 931,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 916
},
{
"end": 973,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 940
},
{
"end": 1088,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1075
},
{
"end": 1354,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1342
},
{
"end": 1399,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1363
},
{
"end": 1512,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1502
},
{
"end": 1750,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1734
},
{
"end": 1890,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1872
},
{
"end": 1934,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1923
},
{
"end": 2049,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2038
},
{
"end": 2326,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2309
},
{
"end": 2460,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2447
},
{
"end": 2710,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2699
},
{
"end": 2771,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2760
},
{
"end": 2932,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 2922
}
] |
In The Court Of Sh. R. B Singh
Additional District Judge 01 (West): Delhi
Rca No. 25/12 Id No. 02401C0156802012
1. Sh. Surinder Narang
S/o Sh. J. C Narang
2. Smt. Janak Narang
W/o Sh. Surinder Narang,
Both residents of :
A72, Yojna Vihar,
Delhi - 110092. ..... Appellants
Versus
Smt. Madhu Rani
W/o Sh. J. C Narang,
A72, Yojna Vihar,
Delhi - 110092. ....Respondent
Date of Institution : 07.04.2012
Date of arguments heard : 19.12.2014
Date of Decision : 23.12.2014
J U D G M E N T
| [
{
"end": 30,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 20
},
{
"end": 75,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 32
},
{
"end": 187,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 172
},
{
"end": 240,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 228
},
{
"end": 491,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 481
}
] |
The Honble Sri Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao And The Honble Mrs. Justice Anis
Writ Petition No.16943 of 2015
26-10-2015
Hameeda Begum W/o Sri Hamza Bin Omer @ Zaffer Pehalwan R/o H.No.18-7-418/4,
Rahmath Nagar Yakuthpura, Hyderabad . Petitoner
State of Telangana Rep. by its Secretary Home Department Secretariat, Hyderabad
and 5 others Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Ch. Siddhartha Sarma Counsel for the Respondents :G.P for Home, State of Telangana <Gist:
>Head Note:
? Citations:
1. Air 1966 Sc 740
2. (1969) 2 Scr 635 = (Air) 1970 Sc 852
3. (1970) 3 Scc 746
4. (1972) 3 Scc 831
5. Air 1972 Sc 1749
6. Air 1975 Sc 1215
7. 1982 (2) Scc 403 The Honble Sri Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao And The Honble Mrs. Justice Anis Writ Petition No.16943 of 2015 Order | [
{
"end": 43,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 23
},
{
"end": 76,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 72
},
{
"end": 160,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 147
},
{
"end": 301,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 283
},
{
"end": 443,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 423
},
{
"end": 751,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 731
},
{
"end": 784,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 780
}
] |
Reportable
In The Supreme Court Of India
Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction
Criminal Appeal No. 1750 Of 2008
Hardeep Singh
…Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab & Ors.
…Respondents
With
Criminal Appeal No. 1751 of 2008
Manjit Pal Singh
…Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab & Anr.
…Respondents
With
Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 9184 of 2008
Babubhai Bhimabhai Bokhiria & Anr.
…Appellants
Versus
State of Gujarat & Ors.
…Respondents
With
Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 7209 of 2010
Rajendra Sharma & Anr.
…Appellants
Versus
State of M.P. & Anr.
…Respondents
With
Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 5724 of 2009
Ravinder Kumar & Anr.
…Appellants
Versus
State of Haryana & Ors.
…Respondents
With
Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 5975 of 2009
Tej Pal & Anr.
…Appellants
Versus
State of Haryana & Ors.
…Respondents
With
Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 9040 of 2010
Juned Pahalwan
…Appellant
Versus
State of U.P.& Anr.
…Respondents
With
Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 5331 of 2009
Rajesh @ Sanjai
…Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. & Anr.
…Respondents
With
Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 9157 of 2009
Ramdhan Mali & Anr.
…Appellants
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Anr.
…Respondents
With
Special Leave Petition (Crl.) Nos. 4503-4504 of 2012
Tej Singh
…Appellant
Versus
State of U.P.
…Respondent
J U D G M E N T
| [
{
"end": 68,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 46
},
{
"end": 205,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 192
},
{
"end": 288,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 273
},
{
"end": 433,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 417
},
{
"end": 520,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 505
},
{
"end": 686,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 659
},
{
"end": 781,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 765
},
{
"end": 943,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 928
},
{
"end": 1035,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1022
},
{
"end": 1192,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1178
},
{
"end": 1285,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1269
},
{
"end": 1436,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1429
},
{
"end": 1528,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1512
},
{
"end": 1682,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1668
},
{
"end": 1763,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1750
},
{
"end": 1913,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1898
},
{
"end": 1994,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1981
},
{
"end": 2140,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 2128
},
{
"end": 2234,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2216
},
{
"end": 2385,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 2376
},
{
"end": 2466,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2453
}
] |
Petitioner:
Smt. Rashmi Kumar
Vs.
Respondent:
Mahesh Kumar Bhada
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 29,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 17
},
{
"end": 67,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 49
}
] |
Petitioner:
State Of Uttar Pradesh
Vs.
Respondent:
Singhara Singh And Others
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 34,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 68,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 54
}
] |
Before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Bangalore
(Scch-8)
Present: Shri P.J. Somashekar B.A., Ll.B.,
Xii Additional Small Causes Judge
and Member, M.A.C.T., Bangalore.
Dated this the 14th day of September 2015
M.V.C. Nos.217/2015 to 219/2015
Petitioner in Mvc Sri V. Pushparaj,
217/2015 S/o M. Vargees,
Aged about 42 years,
Residing at No.18,
7th Main, 1st Cross,
Bharathi Layout, S.G. Palya,
Bangalore - 560 029.
(Sri G.N. Subramani, Advocate)
Petitioner in Mvc Sri Gopal Krishna P.,
218/2015 S/o P. Ramanujam,
Aged about 46 years,
Residing at No.3155,
2nd Cross, Gayathrinagar,
Bangalore - 560 021.
(Sri G.N. Subramani, Advocate)
Petitioner in Mvc Sri Devananda H.M.,
219/2015 S/o H.V. Maligachary,
Aged about 40 years,
Residing at No.83,
Ramanjaneya Layout,
3rd Main, Marathalli,
Bangalore.
(Sri G.N. Subramani, Advocate)
V/s.
2 (Scch-8) M.V.C.217/2015 to
219/2015
Respondents in 1. Sri M. Karunakran,all the cases S/o Muthuswamy,
No.101, Puthukottimedu
Street, Dharapuram,
Erode District,
T. District: Erode,
Tamil Nadu.
(Rc Owner of lorry bearing
Reg. No.TDQ-2589)
(Exparte)
2. The New India Assurance Co.
Ltd., Regional Office,
No.9/2, Mahalakshmi
Chambers, M.G. Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
(Policy
No.720803311302000008329
Valid from 29-03-2014 to
28-03-2015)
(Sri B. Anjaneyalu, Advocate)
Common Judgment
| [
{
"end": 84,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 11
},
{
"end": 118,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 103
},
{
"end": 357,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 337
},
{
"end": 631,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 617
},
{
"end": 682,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 666
},
{
"end": 918,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 904
},
{
"end": 967,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 953
},
{
"end": 1229,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1215
},
{
"end": 1423,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1410
},
{
"end": 1884,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1832
},
{
"end": 2246,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2233
}
] |
Petitioner:
Sate Of Punjab And Ors.
Vs.
Respondent:
Chaman Lal Goyal
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 26,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 71,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 55
}
] |
Petitioner:
Tahsildar Singh And Another
Vs.
Respondent:
The State Of Uttar Pradesh
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 27,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 85,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 63
}
] |
-1-
In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay
Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction
Appeal No. 272 Of 2008
In
Notice Of Motion No. 1303 Of 2008
In
Suit No. 855 Of 2001
Saga Department Stores Limited )
a Company duly incorporated under the
ig )
Companies Act, 1956 and having its )
registered office at B-5, Jangpura, )
Main Mathura Road, New Delhi 110 014 )
and its Mumbai office at 257, S.V. Road )
Bandra (West), Mumbai 400 050 ).. Appellants
Versus
Falak Home Developers Pvt. Limited )
a Company duly incorporated under the )
Companies Act, 1956 and having its )
registered office at 18, Ramko Apartment )
18th Road, Khar (West), Mumbai 400 052 ).. Respondents
Mr. Janak Dwarkadas a/w Mr Rahul Narichania i/b M/s B.Amin
& Co. for the Appellants.
Mr. Zubair Dada i/b S. Mahomedbhai & Co. for the Respondents.
Coram: Swatanter Kumar, C.J. And
. Kanade, J.
V.M Judgment | [
{
"end": 58,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 24
},
{
"end": 598,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 568
},
{
"end": 1160,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1126
},
{
"end": 1469,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1454
},
{
"end": 1493,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1477
},
{
"end": 1563,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1552
},
{
"end": 1668,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1653
},
{
"end": 1740,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1734
}
] |
Petitioner:
Advocate General, State Of Bihar
Vs.
Respondent:
Madhya Pradesh Khair Industries Ltd.
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 44,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 100,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 64
}
] |
1 WP-1767-07.sxw
In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay
Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction
Mhi
Criminal Writ Petition No. 1767 Of 2007
Shri Sharan P Khanna )
Age 55 years of Mumbai Indian Inhabitant )
havig office at 105, Dalamal Tower, )
Plot No.211, Free Press Journal Marg, )
Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021. ).. Petitioner
(Orig.complainant)
Versus
1.
Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. )
a Company incorporated under the )
Companies Act, 1956 having its )
registered office at Jeevan Bharti )
Tower -Ii, Connaught Circus )
New Delhi 110 001 and Mumbai )
regional Business Centre Office )
at Nse Plaza Bandra Kurla Complex,)
Bandra (E) Mumbai 400 051. )
2. State of Maharahtra )
Through Public Prosecutor )..Respondents
Shri P.D.Prasad Rao, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Shri S.P. Bharti, Advocate, for the respondent No.1.
Ms. S.V.Gajare, App, for the respondent No.2.
Coram: J.H.Bhatia,J.
Date : 29th July, 2010.
Judgment | [
{
"end": 82,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 48
},
{
"end": 384,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 369
},
{
"end": 936,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 902
},
{
"end": 1421,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1402
},
{
"end": 1542,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1528
},
{
"end": 1596,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1585
},
{
"end": 1653,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1643
},
{
"end": 1757,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1747
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated: 31/05/2006
Coram
The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice V. Dhanapalan
C.M.A.No.535 of 1998
Sahabudeen .. Claimant/Appellant
-Vs-
1. V.Haridass
2. R. Selvaraj
3. The New India Assurance Co.Ltd.,
Main Road, Mettupalayam 641 301... Respondents
Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act to set aside
the judgment and decree dated 25.03.97 passed in Mcop No.5/95 on the file of
the I Additional District Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore and
pass the award of Rs.3,50,000/- instead of Rs.1,00 ,000/- towards the
compensation to the petitioner.
!For Petitioner : Mr. K.Sudarsanam for
M/s. Surithi Associates
^For Respondents: Mr. Mohd.Fiary Hussain
for R1
Mr.S. Jayashankar for R3
:Judgment | [
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 123,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 110
},
{
"end": 167,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 157
},
{
"end": 244,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 234
},
{
"end": 259,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 248
},
{
"end": 294,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 267
},
{
"end": 748,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 736
},
{
"end": 840,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 822
},
{
"end": 901,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 886
}
] |
Petitioner:
Khudiram Das
Vs.
Respondent:
The State Of West Bengal & Ors.
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 24,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 68,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 48
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Patna
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.267 of 2010
===========================================================
1. Ram Sevak Yadav W/O Late Shri Shivlal Yadav R/O Vill- Mahadeva, P.O. Jageshwar Asthan, P.S. Phulparas, Distt. Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary Govt. Of Bihar, Old Secretariate, Patna
2. The Secretary Deptt. Of Health, Medical Education And Family Welfare, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna
3. The Additional Secretary Deptt. Of Health, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna
4. The Director Health Services, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna
5. The Civil Surgeon-Cum-Chief Medical Officer Madhubani
6. The Incharge Medical Officer Primary Health Centre, Ghoghardiha, Distt. Madhubani .... .... Respondent/s with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 472 of 2010 ===========================================================
1. Umesh Ram S/O Late Asharfi Ram R/O Village, Post Office And Police Station Ghoghardiha, Distt. Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Department Of Health, Government Of Bihar, Patna
2. The Director-In-Chief Health Services, Government Of Bihar, Patna
3. The Regional Deputy Director Health Service, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga
4. The Civil Surgeon - Cum - Chief Medical Officer Distt.- Madhubani
5. The Incharge Medical Officer Primary Health Centre, Ghoghardiha, Distt.- Madhubani .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :(In Cwjc No. 267 of 2010)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. L.K.Yadav
Mr. Prabhu Narayan Prabhakar
Mr. Binod Kumar Yadav
For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Sc23)
(In Cwjc No. 472 of 2010)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. L.K.Yadav
Mr. Prabhu Narayan Prabhakar
For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Gp4)
=========================================================== Patna High Court Cwjc No.267 of 2010 dt. 01-02-2013 2 Coram: Honourable Mr. Justice Navin Sinha and Honourable Mr. Justice Samarendra Pratap Singh and Honourable Mr. Justice V. Nath Oral Judgment | [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 181,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 166
},
{
"end": 337,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 323
},
{
"end": 500,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 413
},
{
"end": 568,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 508
},
{
"end": 623,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 576
},
{
"end": 680,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 631
},
{
"end": 765,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 688
},
{
"end": 911,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 902
},
{
"end": 1058,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1044
},
{
"end": 1208,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1147
},
{
"end": 1286,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1216
},
{
"end": 1355,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1294
},
{
"end": 1441,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1363
},
{
"end": 1602,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1593
},
{
"end": 1660,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1636
},
{
"end": 1711,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1694
},
{
"end": 1814,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1805
},
{
"end": 1872,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1848
},
{
"end": 1985,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 1969
},
{
"end": 2064,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 2053
},
{
"end": 2115,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 2092
},
{
"end": 2150,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 2143
}
] |
Petitioner:
The Automobile Transport(Rajasthan) Ltd.
Vs.
Respondent:
The State Of Rajasthan And OTHERS(And Connected Appeals)
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 52,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 16
},
{
"end": 94,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 76
}
] |
Petitioner:
East India COMMERClAL Co., Ltd. Calcutta And Another
Vs.
Respondent:
The Collector Of Customs, Calcutta
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 52,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 118,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 88
}
] |
In The Court Of Shri Lokesh Kumar Sharma
Additional Sessions Judge04, New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
Unique I D No. : 02403R0184312013
Criminal Revision Number : 57/2/14 dated 07.02.2014
Cc No. : 20/1/13
Ps : Chanakyapuri
U/s : 499/500 Ipc
M/s Jindal Steel & Power Ltd.
Through its Director Sh. Rajeev Bhaduria
Jindal Centre, 12 Bhikaji Cama Place,
New Delhi110066 ....Revisionist/Petitioner
versus
1) The State
Through Additional Public Prosecutor
2) Planman Media Pvt. Ltd.
(Owner of the Sunday Indian)
Iipm Tower,
C56/30, Sector62,
Noida201301
Up
3) Mr.
Arindam Chaudhuri
Editor in Chief
The Sunday Indian
Cr No. 57/2/14 1/32
M/s Jindal Steel & Power Ltd Vs State & Ors.
Iipm Tower
C56/30, Sector62,
Noida201301
Up
4) Mr. A. Sandeep
Editor
The Sunday Indian
Iipm Tower
C56/30, Sector62,
Noida201301
Up
5) Mr. Ashok Bose
Publisher
The Sunday Indian
Iipm Tower
C56/30, Sector62,
Noida201301
Up
..... Respondents
Revision received by Court: 07.02.2014
Arguments concluded : 28.10.2014
Date of order : 13.11.2014
:Order | [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 21
},
{
"end": 383,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 371
},
{
"end": 470,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 445
},
{
"end": 698,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 689
},
{
"end": 764,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 741
},
{
"end": 869,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 852
},
{
"end": 1031,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1007
},
{
"end": 1047,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1035
},
{
"end": 1121,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1111
},
{
"end": 1255,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1245
}
] |
Before The Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court
Dated: 23/12/2011
Coram
The Honourable Mr.Justice V.Ramasubramanian
Civil Revision Petition (Npd)(Md) No.1123 of 2006
And
M.P.No.2 of 2006
1. Ayisha Beevi
2. Beevija
3. Hadijath Beevi
4. Yunusa Begam
5. Syed Ali
6. Sumaya Begam
7. Mohamed Yoosuf
8. Mohamed Ismail
9. Razira Beevi
10.Shabi Mohamed
11.Zakir Mugain
12.Ferosh Khan
13.Augustin
14.Dr.T.C.Joseph ..... Petitioners
Vs.
1. Sheik Mydeen
2. A.P.Nelson
3. Chandrakala Ruben ..... Respondents
-----
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair
and decretal order dated 18.10.2006 made in E.P.No.201 of 2000 in O.S.No.420 of
1976 passed by the Principal District Munsif, Padmanabhapuram.
!For Petitioner ... Mr.K.N.Thampi
^For Respondent-1 ... Mr.Prabhu Rajadurai
For Respondents 2&3 ... Mr.A.Arumugham
-----
:Order | [
{
"end": 45,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 11
},
{
"end": 115,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 98
},
{
"end": 204,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 192
},
{
"end": 215,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 208
},
{
"end": 233,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 219
},
{
"end": 249,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 237
},
{
"end": 261,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 253
},
{
"end": 277,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 265
},
{
"end": 295,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 281
},
{
"end": 313,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 299
},
{
"end": 329,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 317
},
{
"end": 346,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 330
},
{
"end": 362,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 347
},
{
"end": 377,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 363
},
{
"end": 389,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 378
},
{
"end": 406,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 390
},
{
"end": 448,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 436
},
{
"end": 462,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 452
},
{
"end": 483,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 466
},
{
"end": 771,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 761
},
{
"end": 820,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 804
},
{
"end": 864,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 853
}
] |
Before The Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court
Dated : 09/09/2008
Coram
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.Sudanthiram
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.3102 of 2008
Indian Overseas Bank,
K.Abishekapuram Branch,
Mannarpuram,
Tiruchirappallai - 620 020
rep. by the Authorized Officer
A.Rasheed Khan ... Petitioner
Vs
1.M/s.Sree Aravindh Steels Ltd.,
a public limited company registered
under the Companies Act,
14-a, E.V.R. Road,
Puthur, Trichirappalli - 620 017.
2.Sri.Arun Shankar,
Managing Director,
M/s.Sree Aravindh Steels Ltd.,
14-A, E.V.R. Road,
Puthur, Trichirappalli - 620 017.
3.Sri.S.B.Shankar,
"Pathmavilla",
3-B, Bhulabai Desai Road,
Chookkikulam,
Madurai - 625 002.
4.The Inspector of Police,
Thuvakudi Police Station,
Thuvakudi,
Tiruchirappalli - 620 002. ... Respondents
Prayer
Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to
call for the records relating to the order dated 11.12.2007 made in
Crl.M.P.No.1472 of 2007 on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Tiruchirappalli and set aside the same and consequently directing the learned
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchirappalli to pass appropriate order in
accordance with Section 14 of Sarfaesi Act and take possession of the secured
assets and hand over the same to the petitioner bank.
!For Petitioner ... Ms.J.Maria Roselin
for Mr.V.Sribalaji
^For Respondent ... Mr.P.Rajendran
No.4 Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
* * * * *
:Order | [
{
"end": 45,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 11
},
{
"end": 112,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 99
},
{
"end": 229,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 144
},
{
"end": 330,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 305
},
{
"end": 473,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 461
},
{
"end": 604,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 593
},
{
"end": 784,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 695
},
{
"end": 1350,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1335
},
{
"end": 1375,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1364
},
{
"end": 1410,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1399
}
] |
1
In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay,
Nagpur Bench, Nagpur.
Cri. Appeal No.418 Of 2005.
1. Motiram Marotrao Bhongade
aged about 70 years,
Occupation : Cultivator,
2. Sanjay Motiram Bhongade,
aged about 34 years,
Occupation : Service,
3. Laxmibai Motiram Bhongade,
aged about 60 years,
4. Leelabai w/o. Bablu @ Rooprao Falke,
aged about 34 years,
All residents of Satrapur, P.S. Kanhan,
District : Nagpur.
.... Appellants.
// Versus //
The State of Maharashtra,
Through Police Station, Kanhan,
District : Nagpur.
....Respondent.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri Shashank V. Manohar, Advocate for Appellants.
Mrs. K.S. Joshi, A.P.P. for Respondent.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram : A.P. Lavande And P.D.Kode, Jj.
Date Of Reserving Judgment | [
{
"end": 119,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 85
},
{
"end": 460,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 435
},
{
"end": 637,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 614
},
{
"end": 798,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 773
},
{
"end": 887,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 879
},
{
"end": 1035,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 997
},
{
"end": 1296,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1276
},
{
"end": 1617,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1598
},
{
"end": 1668,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1658
},
{
"end": 1853,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1841
},
{
"end": 1866,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1858
}
] |
In The Court Of Ms. Manu Goel Kharb
Metropolitan Magistrate, Dwarka Courts,
New Delhi
In Re: Case No. : 223/12
(Old Cc no. 2663/1 dated 03.10.07)
U/s. 138 Negotiable Instrument Act
1. Cc No. : 223/12
2. Date of Institution : 03.10.2007
3. Name of the complainant, : The Madhav Cooperative
parentage and residence Urban Thrift & Credit
Society Ltd., E17, East
Uttam Nagar, Near Pali
Factory, Uttam Nagar,
New Delhi59 (Through
Sh. Satish Kumar Garg
S/o Sh. Ghanshyam Dass
Gupta, President/AR)
4. Name of accused : Sh. Alamgeer
his parentage S/o Sh. Rafiq Ahmad
and residence R/o B254, Jj Colony,
Hastsal, Uttam Nagar,
New Delhi59
Case No. 223/12 Madhav Cooperative Vs Alamgeer 1 of 20
5. Date when Judgment
was reserved : 12.02.2014
6. Date when Judgment
was pronounced : 22.02.2014
7. Offence complained of : U/s. 138 Ni Act
8. Plea of accused : Not guilty
9. Final Judgment : Convicted
:: Judgment | [
{
"end": 35,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 20
},
{
"end": 79,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 41
},
{
"end": 579,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 527
},
{
"end": 1067,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1050
},
{
"end": 1318,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1310
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1015 of 2004(B)
1. Moideen S/O.Ahammedkutty,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. The Sub Inspector Of Police,
... Respondent
2. State Of Kerala, Rep. By The
For Petitioner :Sri.T.G.Rajendran
For Respondent :Public Prosecutor
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.Sasidharan Nambiar
Dated :13/08/2010
O R D E R
"C.R."
M.Sasidharan Nambiar, J.
--------------------------
Crl.R.P.No.1015 of 2004
--------------------------
Order
| [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 86,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 79
},
{
"end": 232,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 181
},
{
"end": 269,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 254
},
{
"end": 334,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 321
},
{
"end": 432,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 412
},
{
"end": 551,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 531
}
] |
(1)
In The Court Of Sh. Girish Kathpalia, Asj05,
South East District, Saket, New Delhi
Sc No. 30/14
State
vs
1. Subramanyam Yadav @ Rahul Madrasi,
S/o Sh. S. Narsingha Rao,
R/o Gali No. 8, Ajanta Park, Khoda Colony,
Ghaziabad, Up. (proclaimed offender)
2. Ramesh Kumar S/o Sh. Netrapal,
Gali No. 5, Prakash Nagar,
Khoda Colony, Ghaziabad, Up &
3. Daya Nand S/o Shri Khem Chand,
R/o village Rajokri Pahadi,
New Delhi
Fir No. 473/06
Ps Hazrat Nizamuddin
Offence under Section 392/397/411/34 Ipc
Unique Id : 2403Ro493582006
Date of Committal : 15.01.2007
First Date in this Court : 22.01.2014
Date of conclusion of arguments: 30.04.2014
Date of decision : 05.05.2014
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 50,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 34
},
{
"end": 173,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 168
},
{
"end": 199,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 182
},
{
"end": 391,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 379
},
{
"end": 488,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 479
},
{
"end": 722,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 702
}
] |
1
In The Court Of Dr. Archana Sinha
Addl. District & Sessions Judge (Central03)
Tis Hazari Court / Delhi
M. No. : 19/2013 in suit No. No. 1018/2008.
Titech Engineers Pvt. Ltd. ..... Plaintiff/Respondent Vs.
Tirumula Tirupati Devasthanams ....Defendants/Petitioners 12.05.2015 Order | [
{
"end": 61,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 44
},
{
"end": 173,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 157
},
{
"end": 259,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 233
},
{
"end": 371,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 341
}
] |
The Honble Sri Justice U. Durga Prasad Rao
M.A.C.M.A No.1656 of 2010
05-11-2014
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd, Rep by its Regional Manager, Begumpet,
Hyd..... Appellant
M. Sreedevi and others.. Respondents
Counsel for Appellant : Sri T. Mahender Rao
Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 5: Sri Mohd. Yousuf
Counsel for Respondent No.6 : Sri M. Achutha Reddy
<Gist:
>Head Note:
? Cases referred:
1) 2008 Acj 2855
2) 2008 Acj 1307
3) 2003(5) Ald 162
4) 2004 Acj 1 (Sc)
5) 1985 Acj 1397 (Sc)
6) 1995 Acj 358 (Ap)
7) 2009 Acj 88 (Ap)
Honble Sri Justice U. Durga Prasad Rao
M.A.C.M.A.No.1656 of 2010
Judgment | [
{
"end": 42,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 23
},
{
"end": 136,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 97
},
{
"end": 208,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 197
},
{
"end": 298,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 283
},
{
"end": 351,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 339
},
{
"end": 407,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 391
},
{
"end": 671,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 652
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
WP(Crl.).No. 323 of 2009(S)
1. Shruthi P., W/O.Ravi.K.,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. State Of Kerala,
... Respondent
2. District Magistrate
3. Superintendent, Central Prison,
For Petitioner :Sri.Bechu Kurian Thomas
For Respondent :Government Pleader
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.Basant
The Hon'ble Mrs. Justice M.C.Hari Rani
Dated :06/10/2009
O R D E R
R.Basant & M.C.Hari Rani, Jj.
------------------------------------
W.P(Crl.) No.323 of 2009
-------------------------------------
Dated this the 6th day of October, 2009
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 85,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 75
},
{
"end": 187,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 172
},
{
"end": 256,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 237
},
{
"end": 291,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 261
},
{
"end": 350,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 331
},
{
"end": 437,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 429
},
{
"end": 476,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 463
},
{
"end": 533,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 525
},
{
"end": 549,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 536
}
] |
Kambli 1 Wp1688.10
In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
Writ Petition No. 1688 Of 2010
...
Tanaji Madhukar Barbade ...Petitioner v/s.
State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents ...
Mr.G.N.Salunke for the Petitioner. Mr.S.R.Nargolkar, Addl.GP for State.
...
Coram: D.K. Deshmukh, Anoop V. Mohta & Ranjit More,Jjj Dated: 26th October, 2010 Judgment | [
{
"end": 115,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 81
},
{
"end": 402,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 379
},
{
"end": 445,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 425
},
{
"end": 489,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 478
},
{
"end": 526,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 513
},
{
"end": 577,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 564
},
{
"end": 593,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 579
},
{
"end": 607,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 596
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated: 02/08/2006
Coram
The Hon'Ble MR.A.P.Shah, Chief Justice
And
The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice D.Murugesan
W.A. No.443 of 2006
to
W.A. No.445 of 2006
and
W.A. No.485 of 2006
to
W.A. No.487 of 2006
And
Wamp. No.1002 of 2006
and
Wamp. No.1003 of 2006
R. Shanmugam ..Appellant
in Wa 443 of 2006
Ammasi Kutty .. Appellant
in Wa 444 of 2006
1. M. Duraisamy
2. M. Mani
.. Appellants
in Wa 445 of 2006
1. M. Manimekalai
2. S. Maruthachalam .. Appellants
in Wa 485 of 2006
1. Perichiappa Gounder
2. Kumarasamy
3. Maruchamy Gounder
4. A. Natarajan
5. Ramasamy Gounder
6. Marathal
7. Ganesh
8. Radhamani
.. Appellants
in Wa 486 of 2006
1. Sellappa Gounder
2. G. Karunanidhi .. Appellants
in Wa 487 of 2006
-Vs-
1. The State of Tamil Nadu
rep. by its Secretary
Housing and Urban
Development
Fort St. George,
Chennai 600 009
2. The Tamil Nadu Housing Board
represented by its
Managing Director
No.331, Anna Salai,
Nandanam
Chennai-35.
3. The Special Tahsildar
Housing Scheme Unit-II
Coimbatore-18.
..Respondents
in all W.As.
Memorandum of Grounds of Writ Appeals under Clause 15 of the Letters
Patent, against the order of the learned Judge dated 23.12.2005 passed in
W.P.No.37583 of 2004,20237 of 2005,24968 of 2005,37578 of 2004,37580 of 2004
and 20176 of 2005 respectively.
!For Appellants : Mr.K.Chandru
in all Appeals Senior counsel for
Mr.R.N.Amarnath
^For 2nd Respondents : Mr.R. Vidhuthalai
in all appeals Advocate General
For Mr.D.Veerasekaran
For respondents : Mr.J.Rajakalifullah
1 and 3 in all appeals Govt. Pleader
:Judgment | [
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 108,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 97
},
{
"end": 171,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 160
},
{
"end": 359,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 347
},
{
"end": 455,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 443
},
{
"end": 557,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 545
},
{
"end": 569,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 562
},
{
"end": 687,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 673
},
{
"end": 708,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 692
},
{
"end": 812,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 793
},
{
"end": 827,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 817
},
{
"end": 851,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 834
},
{
"end": 870,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 858
},
{
"end": 891,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 875
},
{
"end": 907,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 899
},
{
"end": 918,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 912
},
{
"end": 933,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 924
},
{
"end": 1054,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1038
},
{
"end": 1073,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1059
},
{
"end": 1190,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1170
},
{
"end": 1328,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1304
},
{
"end": 1450,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1433
},
{
"end": 1900,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1891
},
{
"end": 1989,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1977
},
{
"end": 2036,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2021
},
{
"end": 2129,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2115
},
{
"end": 2177,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2161
}
] |
1
In The Court Of Ms. Veena Rani, Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate, District South East, Saket Court, New Delhi.
State Versus Abid @ Guddu
Fir No:196/2011
U/s 25/54/59 Arms Act
P. S. Kalkaji
Date of filing of the charge sheet : 06082011
Date of reserving order : Not reserved.
Date of pronouncement : 26092014
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 38,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 28
},
{
"end": 118,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 96
},
{
"end": 137,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 132
},
{
"end": 181,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 177
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Patna
Letters Patent Appeal No.2294 of 2015
Arising out of
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17721 of 2015
===========================================================
Amrawati Devi, wife of Sri Dinanath Yadav, Resident of Mohallla- Manik Chand Talab, P.O. Anishabad, P.S. Gardanibagh, District- Patna.
.... .... Appellant Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Town Planning Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Town Planning Department, Government of Bihar.
3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Law and Justice Department, Government of Bihar.
4. Patna Municipal Corporation through its Chief Executive Officer, Maurya Lok Building, Bailey Road, Patna.
5. Mr. Binod Kumar, son of Sri Janak Prasad Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Mohanpur, Punaichak, P.O and P.S. Shastri Nagar, District- Patna.
6. Roop Narayan, son of Shri Ram Narayan Prasad, Resident of Mohalla- Mehandiganj, P.O and P.S. Patna City, District-Patna, Bihar.
.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant : Mr. Vinod Kanth, Sr. Advocate.
Mr. S.B.K. Manglam, Advocate.
Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate.
For the State : Mr. Lalit Kishore, P.A.A.G.
Mr. U.S.S. Singh, G.P.-I
Mr. R.K. Chandram, A.C. to G.P.-I
For Respondent No. 6 : Mr. Jitendra Singh, Sr. Advocate.
Mr. Piyush Lall, Advocate.
Mr. Yash Singh, Advocate Mr. Tej Pratap Singh, Advocate.
Mr. Kamal Kishore Singh, Advocate.
For the Corporation : Mr. Prasoon Sinha, Advocate. =========================================================== Coram: Honourable Mr. Justice I. A. Ansari, A.C.J.
and Honourable Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta C.A.V. Judgment | [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 285,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 272
},
{
"end": 458,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 444
},
{
"end": 665,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 577
},
{
"end": 758,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 676
},
{
"end": 792,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 765
},
{
"end": 891,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 880
},
{
"end": 1028,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1016
},
{
"end": 1277,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1266
},
{
"end": 1314,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1300
},
{
"end": 1344,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1333
},
{
"end": 1399,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1386
},
{
"end": 1451,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1439
},
{
"end": 1502,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1489
},
{
"end": 1560,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1546
},
{
"end": 1594,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1583
},
{
"end": 1623,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1613
},
{
"end": 1654,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1638
},
{
"end": 1692,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1673
},
{
"end": 1745,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1732
},
{
"end": 1859,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1847
},
{
"end": 1910,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1898
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Patna
Criminal Appeal (Db) No.196 of 2008
===========================================================
Raju Mistri @ Riyazuddin, son of Wafati Mian, resident of Nayee Bazar, P.S. Bhagwan Bazar, Distt- Saran at Chapra .... .... Appellant/s Versus State Of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Ms. Shashi Bala Verma, App
=========================================================== Coram: Honourable Mr. Justice Mihir Kumar Jha and Honourable Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Trivedi Cav Judgment | [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 171,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 160
},
{
"end": 317,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 303
},
{
"end": 458,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 444
},
{
"end": 512,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 495
},
{
"end": 623,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 608
},
{
"end": 671,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 651
}
] |
Hon'Ble Sri Justice K.C.Bhanu Hon'Ble Sri Justice M.S.Ramachandra Rao
Criminal Appeal Nos.1012 of 2008 and batch
dated:14-03-2013
Muddana Goud and others....APPELLANTS
State of Ap, rep by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad....RESPONDENT <Gist:
>Head Note:
!Counsel for Appellants in Crl.A.No.1012 of 2008 and for respondents in Crl.A.No.475 of 2010:Smt. D.Sangeetha Reddy ^Counsel for State: Addl. Public Prosecutor ?Cases referred:
1 2007 (2) Alt Crl 1 (D.B.) (A.P.) Common Judgment | [
{
"end": 29,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 20
},
{
"end": 70,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 51
},
{
"end": 155,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 143
},
{
"end": 198,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 187
},
{
"end": 403,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 386
}
] |
1
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Jabalpur.
First Appeal No.961/2010
Harjas Rai Makhija
-Versus-
Smt. Pushparani Jain and another.
Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. Trivedi.
Shri R.P. Agrawal, learned senior counsel assisted by
Shri Sanjay Agrawal, learned counsel for the
appellant.
Smt. Shobha Menon, learned senior counsel assisted
by Shri C.A. Thomas, learned counsel for the
respondents.
Shri P.S. Chouhan, learned counsel for respondent
No.2.
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 51,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 11
},
{
"end": 140,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 122
},
{
"end": 211,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 196
},
{
"end": 270,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 258
},
{
"end": 305,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 293
},
{
"end": 373,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 359
},
{
"end": 452,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 440
},
{
"end": 517,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 506
},
{
"end": 597,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 585
}
] |
Petitioner:
Khandelwal Metal & Engineering Works And Another Etc.
Vs.
Respondent:
Union Of India And Others
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 48,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 99,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 85
}
] |
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated: 10/10/2003
Coram
The Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R.Banumathi
C.R.P.(P.D.) No. 1147 of 2001
K.K.Swaminathan ..Petitioner
-Vs-
Srinivasagam ..Respondent
Civil Revision Petition under section 115 of Civil Procedure Code
filed against the Order dated 16.03.2001 in I.A.No.98/2001 in O.S.No.24
73/1996 on the file of Additional District Munsif Court, Coimbatore.
!For Petitioner : Mr.A.Venkatesan
^For Respondent : Ms.M.B.Dominique for Mr.P.Duraisamy
:Order | [
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 105,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 94
},
{
"end": 153,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 138
},
{
"end": 213,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 201
},
{
"end": 522,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 510
},
{
"end": 559,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 546
},
{
"end": 578,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 567
}
] |
Case No.:
Tax Reference Case 1-2 of 1992
Petitioner:
Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals And Fertilizers Ltd. Madras
Respondent:
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Madras
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 109,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 55
},
{
"end": 157,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 123
}
] |
Hon'Ble Sri Justice K.C.Bhanu And Hon'Ble Sri Justice Challa Kodanda Ram
Criminal Appeal No.722 Of 2011 And
dated:12-06-2013
Karam Sreenivasu Dora .... Appellant
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra
Pradesh, Hyderabad.....RESPONDENT Counsel for the appellant:Sri P.Prabhakar Reddy Counsel for the respondent: Public Prosecutor <Gist:
>Head Note:
?Cases referred:
1. A.I.R.1952 Sc 343
2. (1973) 2 Scc 793
3. Air 1984 Sc 1622
4. (2009)13 Supreme Court Cases 534
5. (2012) 6 Supreme Court Cases 403
6. A.I.R.1971 Sc 1871
7. (2006) 13 Scc 516
8. A.I.R.1956 Sc 116
9. A.I.R.1980 Sc 898
10.(2002)4 Scc 679 Hon'Ble Sri Justice K.C.Bhanu And Hon'Ble Sri Justice Challa Kodanda Ram Criminal Appeal No.722 Of 2011 And Referred Trial No.7 Of 2012 Common Judgment | [
{
"end": 29,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 20
},
{
"end": 72,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 54
},
{
"end": 174,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 153
},
{
"end": 221,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 198
},
{
"end": 359,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 342
},
{
"end": 720,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 711
},
{
"end": 763,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 745
}
] |
Petitioner:
Delhi Judicial Service Association Tis Hazaricourt, Delhi Et
Vs.
Respondent:
State Of Gujarat And Ors. Etc-Etc.
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 69,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 108,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 92
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature For Rajasthan
At Jaipur Bench, Jaipur
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2581/2015
K Ramnarayan-Petitioner vs. Shri Pukhraj-Respondent
with
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3925/2015
Bhagwan Sahai-Petitioner Vs. Satyanarayan Maheshwari-Respondent
with
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2655/2015
M/s. Ganeshdas Gyanchand Munot & Anr.-Petitioners
vs.
Heera Lal Peepada-Respondent
with
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3926/2015
Ramesh Chand-Petitioner vs. Satyanarayan Maheshwari-Respondent
with
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3968/2015
Kailash Chand-Petitioner Vs. Satyanarayan Maheshwari-Respondent
with
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5072/2015
Shri Pankaj Kumar Lodha-Petitioner Vs. Amarchand & Ors.-Respondents
Date of Judgment :: 18/05/2015
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi
Mr. M.M. Ranjan, Sr. Counsel assisted by Mr. Saurabh Bhandari, Mr. B.L. Agarwal, Mr. Alok Chaturvedi, Mr. M.A. Khan, for the petitioners.
Mr. J.P. Gupta, Miss Shikha Parnami, Mr. Anil Mehta, for the respondents.
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 70,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 121,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 109
},
{
"end": 149,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 142
},
{
"end": 218,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 205
},
{
"end": 257,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 234
},
{
"end": 342,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 317
},
{
"end": 385,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 368
},
{
"end": 453,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 441
},
{
"end": 492,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 469
},
{
"end": 561,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 548
},
{
"end": 600,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 577
},
{
"end": 679,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 661
},
{
"end": 704,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 695
},
{
"end": 794,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 779
},
{
"end": 814,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 803
},
{
"end": 860,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 844
},
{
"end": 878,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 866
},
{
"end": 899,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 884
},
{
"end": 914,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 905
},
{
"end": 951,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 941
},
{
"end": 972,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 958
},
{
"end": 988,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 978
}
] |
1
R
In The High Court Of Karnataka At Bangalore
Dated the 3rd day of August 2012
:Before:
Hon'Ble Mr.Justice : V.Jagannathan
Writ Petition No. 14047 / 2012 (Gm-Res)
Between :
Sri B.V.Acharya,
Senior Advocate,
S/o late Ramachandra Acharya,
Aged about 78 years,
No.42, 5th Main Road,
Jayamahal Extension,
Bangalore - 560 046.
...Petitioner
( By Sri R.N.Narasimhamurthy & Sri Ashok
Harnahalli, Senior Advocates, along with
Sri Sreenivas Rao, Sri Vishal Badni,
Sri Shahul Hameed and Sri Sandesh J.Chouta, Advocates. )
And:
1. Sri N.Venkateshaiah,
S/o late Narayanappa,
Aged about 94 years,
No.7, Shivaganga Mutt Road,
Chamarajapete, Bangalore-18.
2. The State by Lokayuktha Police,
Bangalore, represented by
the Public Prosecutor,
High Court Buildings, Bangalore.
...Respondents
( By Sri Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate,
along with Sri B.Rajendra Prasad, Advocate, &
Sri Shivananda Raj for Kochhar & Co.,
Advocates for R-1.
Sri B.A.Belliappa, Advocate for R-2. )
2
Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the
Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.
praying to issue a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned
order dated 21.4.2012 in P.C.R.No. 19/2012 passed by the
Court of the Xxiii Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge (Special
Court, Lokayuktha), Bangalore, and also to quash the
complaint, which is the basis of the said case.
This petition coming on for orders this day, the court
made the following :
Order
| [
{
"end": 104,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 68
},
{
"end": 227,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 214
},
{
"end": 304,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 293
},
{
"end": 538,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 519
},
{
"end": 571,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 545
},
{
"end": 631,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 618
},
{
"end": 649,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 637
},
{
"end": 668,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 655
},
{
"end": 693,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 677
},
{
"end": 741,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 726
},
{
"end": 888,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 883
},
{
"end": 1107,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1095
},
{
"end": 1166,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1149
},
{
"end": 1211,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1197
},
{
"end": 1304,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1291
}
] |
In The Court Of Sh. Reetesh Singh, Asj-02/Ftc
New Delhi District Patiala House Courts, Delhi
Crl. Appeal No. 16/2014
I.D. No 02403R0071782014
Masood Paracha
S/o Sh. Siraj Paracha
R/o 2148, Kucha Dakhani Rai,
Pataudi House,
Daryaganj, New Delhi.
......Appellant
Versus
State (Nct of Delhi) ...... Respondent
Date of institution of the case : 06.05.2014
Date of reservation of order : 12.09.2014
Date of announcement of Judgment : 30.09.2014
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 33,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 20
},
{
"end": 97,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 35
},
{
"end": 165,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 151
},
{
"end": 360,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 340
}
] |
In The Court Of Shri Arun Kumar, Metropolitan
Magistrate:Dwarka Courts:New Delhi
Cc No: 308/13
Unique Case Id No: 02405Ro202512013
Sunni Kadian
S/o Late Shri Kharak Singh
R/o Rz-55, B Block,
Old Roshan Pura Extn.,
Najafgarh
New Delhi-110043 ...........Complainant
Versus
Ashok Kumar
S/o Late Shri Khajan Singh,
R/o 3/D, New Roshan Pura Extn.,
Ration Office Wali Gali,
Najafgarh.
New Delhi-110043 ...............Accused
Offence Complained of or proved : Under section 138 of
Negotiable Instruments
Act, 1881
Plea of the Accused : Pleaded not guilty
Date of filing : 25.06.2013
Date of Institution : 26.06.2013
Date of reserving judgment/order : 04.01.2014
Final Order/Judgment : Acquitted
Date of pronouncement : 10.01.2014
Judgment | [
{
"end": 31,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 21
},
{
"end": 88,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 33
},
{
"end": 154,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 142
},
{
"end": 354,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 343
}
] |
1
Sa No.908 of 2012
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh ; Jabalpur
S.A.No. 908 of 2012
Madhu Janiyani
Vs.
State of M.P
For the Appellant : Shri Naman Nagrath, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri
Himanshu Mishra Advocate.
For the Respondent : Smt Sharda Dubey, Pl.
Order
| [
{
"end": 128,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 89
},
{
"end": 223,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 209
},
{
"end": 309,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 297
},
{
"end": 354,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 341
},
{
"end": 428,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 413
},
{
"end": 479,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 467
}
] |
1
®
In The High Court Of Karnataka At Bangalore
Dated This The 30th Day Of July 2012
Before
The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice Jawad Rahim
Crl. R.P. No.1262/2008
Between:
1. Smt J.Umadevi,
W/O N.Rathnakar Babu,
Aged About 31 Years,
Residing At No.758, 8Th Cross,
5Th Main, R.T.Nagar,
Bangalore
2. Smt.J.Usha,
W/O Ravishankar Raju,
Aged About 29 Years,
Residing At No.107,
"Priyadarshini Apartment",
1St Floor, 1St Stage,
Indiranagar,
Bangalore
... Petitioners
(By Sri M.S.Rajendraprasad, Adv.,)
And:
State Of Karnataka
By Indiranagar Police,
Bangalore
... Respondent
(By Sri Raja Subramanya Bhat, Hcgp.,)
2
This Crl.Rp Filed Under Section 401 Cr.P.C
Praying To Set Aside The Order Dated 13.08.2008
Passed By The X Addl. Cmm., Mayo Hall, Bangalore
In C.C.No.22101/2007, So Far As The Petitioners Are
Concerned And Consequently Discharge The
Petitioners.
This Revision Petition Coming On For
Dictating Orders This Day, The Court Made The
Following:
Order
| [
{
"end": 99,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 63
},
{
"end": 225,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 214
},
{
"end": 300,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 291
},
{
"end": 478,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 472
},
{
"end": 769,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 751
},
{
"end": 810,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 792
},
{
"end": 940,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 920
}
] |
They had admittedly left India after the first day of March, 1947, for Pakistan and it appears from the counter-affidavits that they had left on account of the setting up of the dominions of India and Pakistan. | [
{
"end": 30,
"label": "GPE",
"start": 25
},
{
"end": 65,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 54
},
{
"end": 79,
"label": "GPE",
"start": 71
},
{
"end": 196,
"label": "GPE",
"start": 191
},
{
"end": 209,
"label": "GPE",
"start": 201
}
] |
Non-applicant produced witnesses NAW 1 M.B. Mandarvalia and other witnesses NAW 2 Chhotu Lal, owner of the vehicle, NAW 3 Subhash Singh Dabi and NAW 4 Riyaj Anwar and NAW 5 Sanjay Kumar. | [
{
"end": 55,
"label": "WITNESS",
"start": 39
},
{
"end": 92,
"label": "WITNESS",
"start": 82
},
{
"end": 140,
"label": "WITNESS",
"start": 122
},
{
"end": 162,
"label": "WITNESS",
"start": 151
},
{
"end": 185,
"label": "WITNESS",
"start": 173
}
] |
No doubt, civil and criminal jurisdiction is conferred on the Gram Katchahry, but the Gram Katchahry can sentence an accused to (i) simple imprisonment for a term not exceeding three months; (ii) fine not exceeding Rs. 1000/-, and in default of payment of fine, simple imprisonment not exceeding 15 days. | [] |
The company was incorporated on the 13th of November, 1980. | [
{
"end": 58,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 36
}
] |
In 1994 MPU681 (M. P. Motor Yan Karadhan Adhiniyam) Naveen Raghunath Karnik v. State of M. P., the Division Bench of this Court held that Section 20 of the Adhiniyam contains an efficacious and alternative remedy on unsuccess Under Section 16(4) and aggrieved person has to pursue that course. | [
{
"end": 93,
"label": "PRECEDENT",
"start": 3
},
{
"end": 148,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 138
},
{
"end": 245,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 232
}
] |