text
stringlengths
14
24k
entities
listlengths
0
68
1 High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Before Division Bench: Justice P.K. Jaiswal Justice Alok Verma Cr.A. No.717/2011 Shakir vs The State of Madhya Pradesh ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Presence : For appellant : Shri Ashish Sharma, Advocate For respondent : Shri Deepak Rawal, learned Dy. A.G. for the respondent/State. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cr.A. No.601/2011 Shahadat vs The State of Madhya Pradesh ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Presence : For appellant : Shri Gaurav Shrivastava, Advocate For respondent : Shri Deepak Rawal, learned Dy. A.G. for the respondent/State. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Judgment
[ { "end": 54, "label": "COURT", "start": 17 }, { "end": 109, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 97 }, { "end": 161, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 151 }, { "end": 258, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 252 }, { "end": 347, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 324 }, { "end": 519, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 506 }, { "end": 592, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 580 }, { "end": 875, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 867 }, { "end": 964, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 941 }, { "end": 1141, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1123 }, { "end": 1214, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1202 } ]
Petitioner: Union Of India Vs. Respondent: Ram Charan & Others Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 26, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 56, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 46 } ]
Case No.: Appeal (crl.) 1315 of 2005 Petitioner: Nallapati Sivaiah Respondent: Sub-Divisional Officer, Guntur, A.P. Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 68, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 51 }, { "end": 118, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 82 } ]
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 02..12..2006 C O R A M The Honourable Mrs. Justice Prabha Sridevan Writ Petition Nos.23581 to 23584 of 2006 Selvi J. Jayalalitha .. Petitioner in W.P. No.23581 of 2006 V.K. Sasikala .. Petitioner in W.P. No.23582 of 2006 M/s. Sasi Enterprises, 14, Parsn Manere, 602, Anna Salai, Chennai-6, rep. by its .. Petitioner in W.P. Nos. Partner V.K. Sasikala. 23583 and 23584 of 2006 Versus 1. The Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Finance Department, North Block, New Delhi-110 001. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle Ii(2), Chennai-34. 3. The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle Ii(2), .. Respondents in Chennai-34. all the Writ Petitions - - - - - Prayer : Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to issue writs of declaration to declare that Section 278E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is ultra vires, illegal, unreasonable and unconstitutional, repugnant to the Constitution of India. - - - - - For Petitioners : Mr. Guru Krishnakumar and Mr. Subramanium Prasad for Mr. N. Jothi, Assisted by Mr. L.G. Shanmugha Sundaram, Mr. A. Kandasamy and Mr. V. Karthikeyan. For Respondents : Mr. Gopal Subramaniam, Additional Solicitor General of India, Assisted by Mr. K. Ramasamy, Senior Public Prosecutor for I.T. Cases, Mr. S. Rajappa and Mr. P. Wilson, Asst. Solicitor General of India. - - - - - O R D E R
[ { "end": 41, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 120, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 105 }, { "end": 188, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 168 }, { "end": 254, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 241 }, { "end": 328, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 312 }, { "end": 510, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 496 }, { "end": 683, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 613 }, { "end": 750, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 692 }, { "end": 1170, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1153 }, { "end": 1210, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1192 }, { "end": 1241, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1233 }, { "end": 1296, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1273 }, { "end": 1327, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1315 }, { "end": 1363, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1349 }, { "end": 1421, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1404 }, { "end": 1517, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1506 }, { "end": 1602, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1592 }, { "end": 1631, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1622 } ]
Case No.: Appeal (civil) 8161-8162 of 2003 Appeal (civil) 8163-8164 of 2003 Petitioner: Union of India and Anr. Respondent: Azadi Bachao Andolan and Anr. Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 106, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 91 }, { "end": 154, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 134 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras Dated:- 12.10.2006 Coram:- The Honourable Mr. Justice P.Sathasivam and The Honourable Mr. Justice S.Manikumar Crl.O.P. No.21432 of 2002 Manjula ... Petitioner vs. M/s.Colgate Palmolive (India) Limited, represented by its authorised signatory T.Harikumar. ... Respondent Criminal Original Petition filed to call for the records relating to Cc No.1130 of 2002, on the file of the Viii Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai, and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Kannan For Respondent : Mr.M.L.Joseph, for M/s.Surana & Surana Mr.M.Babu Muthu Meeran, Additional Public Prosecutor, to assist the Court. - - - - - Judgment
[ { "end": 41, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 111, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 99 }, { "end": 154, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 143 }, { "end": 192, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 185 }, { "end": 242, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 225 }, { "end": 549, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 541 }, { "end": 583, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 573 }, { "end": 639, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 620 } ]
Petitioner: Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Vs. Respondent: State Of Bihar And Others Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 33, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 16 }, { "end": 67, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 53 } ]
Pvr 1/17 apl23-13-wp3739-11grp.sxw In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Criminal Writ Petition No.3739 Of 2011 Shyambahadur Purshottam Sharma. ...Petitioner vs. 1.Shri.Sudhakar Narshu Poojary. 2.State of Maharashtra ...Respondents With Criminal Writ Petition No.3740 Of 2011 Shyambahadur Purshottam Sharma. ...Petitioner vs. 1.Shri.Sudhakar Narshu Poojary. 2.State of Maharashtra ...Respondents With Criminal Writ Petition No.3741 Of 2011 Shyambahadur Purshottam Sharma. ...Petitioner vs. 1.Shri.Bhupen Tokarshi Gala 2.State of Maharashtra ...Respondents With Criminal Writ Petition No.3742 Of 2011 Shyambahadur Purshottam Sharma. ...Petitioner vs. 1.Shri.Bhupen Tokarshi Gala 2.State of Maharashtra ...Respondents With Criminal Application u/Sec.482 No.23 Of 2013 and Criminal Application u/Sec.482 No.24 Of 2013 Deepak Sevantilal Javeri ...Applicant vs. 1.M/s.Alpha Exports 2.The State of Maharashtra ...Respondents --- Pvr 2/17 apl23-13-wp3739-11grp.sxw Mr.Niranjan Mundargi @ Mr.H.H.Nagi i/b. M/s.H.H.Nagi & Associates, for Petitioner in W.P.nos.3739 of 2011 to 3742 of 2011. Mr.Ashish Mehta @ Mr.Mehul A.Rathod, for the Applicant in Apl nos.23 of 2013 and 24 of 2013. Mr.Jatin P.Shah, for Respondent no.1 in W.P.nos.3739 of 2011 to 3742 of 2011. Mr.Hemant Jain - in person- Representative of Respondent no.1-M/s.Alpha Exports present in Court in Apl nos.23/2013 & 24/2013. Mr.A.R.Patil, App for State-Respondent no.2. Mr.Murtaza Najmi, Amicus Curie. --- ig Coram : K.U.Chandiwal, J. Reserved On : 22nd August, 2013. Pronounced On : 23rd August, 2013 --- Judgment
[ { "end": 127, "label": "COURT", "start": 93 }, { "end": 401, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 371 }, { "end": 484, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 461 }, { "end": 512, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 490 }, { "end": 737, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 707 }, { "end": 865, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 842 }, { "end": 922, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 900 }, { "end": 1123, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1093 }, { "end": 1217, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1197 }, { "end": 1244, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1222 }, { "end": 1435, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1405 }, { "end": 1515, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1495 }, { "end": 1542, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1520 }, { "end": 1818, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1794 }, { "end": 1895, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1882 }, { "end": 1926, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1906 }, { "end": 2165, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2148 }, { "end": 2179, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2171 }, { "end": 2378, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2366 }, { "end": 2398, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2384 }, { "end": 2542, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2530 }, { "end": 2624, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2613 }, { "end": 2819, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2810 }, { "end": 2873, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2860 }, { "end": 3059, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 3046 } ]
Petitioner: S. L. Goswami Vs. Respondent: State Of Madhya Pradesh Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 27, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 70, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 47 } ]
Fir No. 124/06 State Vs. Sunil Kumar U/s. 279/304A Ipc & 185 Mv Act Ps: Keshav Puram In The Court Of Sh. Viplav Dabas Mm­4(North West) Rohini Courts Delhi Fir No. 124/06 State Vs. Sunil Kumar U/s. 279/304A Ipc & 185 Mv Act Ps: Keshav Puram Case Id No. 02404R0381922006 Date of Institution of case : 21.12.2006 Date of Judgment : 31.10.2014 Judgment
[ { "end": 93, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 88 }, { "end": 109, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 98 }, { "end": 349, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 337 }, { "end": 436, "label": "COURT", "start": 350 }, { "end": 582, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 577 }, { "end": 598, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 587 } ]
The Honble Sri Justice U. Durga Prasad Rao M.A.C.M.A No.3149 of 2009 28-04-2014 United India Insurance Co. Ltd..... Appellant Y.Padmaja Vani and others.. Respondents Counsel for Appellant : Sri V. Sambasiva Rao Counsel for Respondent No.3: Sri Posani Venkateswarlu <Gist: >Head Note: ? Cases referred: 1)2001 (1) Alt 495 2)2014(1) Ald 111 (Sc) 3)2011 (6) Alt 321 = Laws (Aph) 2010-7-52 4)Laws (Sc) 2013-8-57 5)(2002) 7 Supreme Court Cases 456 6) Air 2012 Sc 86 The Honble Sri Justice U. Durga Prasad Rao M.A.C.M.A. No.3149 of 2009 Judgment
[ { "end": 42, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 23 }, { "end": 127, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 97 }, { "end": 166, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 152 }, { "end": 242, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 226 }, { "end": 298, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 278 }, { "end": 552, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 533 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras Dated : 22-08-2008 Coram The Honourable Mr. Justice P.K. Misra And The Honourable Mr. Justice K. Mohan Ram O.S.A.NOs.377 & 378 Of 2001 M/s. Perfect Automotive Components, 216, Hans Bhawan, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110 002. .. Appellant in OSA.No.377 of 2001 M/s. Pricol Lubricants (India) Pvt. Ltd., 216, Hans Bhawan, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110 002. .. Appellant in OSA.No.378 of 2001 Vs. M/s. Premier Instruments & Controls Ltd., No.6, Church Lane, Ritherdon Road, Vepery, Madras 7. .. Respondent in both OSAs Appeals filed under Order 36 Rule 1 of the O.S. Rules and Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the common judgment dated 3.2.2000 passed in C.S.Nos.534 & 535 of 1993 passed by the learned single Judge. For Appellant in : M/s.V. Nataraj both OSAs B. Giridhar Rao For Respondent in both OSAs : Mrs. Gladys Daniel - - - Common Judgment
[ { "end": 41, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 109, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 99 }, { "end": 153, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 141 }, { "end": 218, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 189 }, { "end": 377, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 341 }, { "end": 544, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 509 }, { "end": 912, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 897 }, { "end": 969, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 956 } ]
Reportable In The Supreme Court Of India Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Criminal Appeal No.2094 Of 2011 (Arising out of Slp (Crl.) No.9919 of 2010) Shiji @ Pappu and Ors. ...Appellants Versus Radhika and Anr. ...Respondents J U D G M E N T
[ { "end": 64, "label": "COURT", "start": 42 }, { "end": 257, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 244 }, { "end": 346, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 339 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Patna Second Appeal No.33 of 2007 Against the judgment and decree dated 13.11.2006 passed by the learned Additional District Judge - 7th Patna in Title Appeal No. 60 of 2006 dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment and decree dated 3.5.2006 passed by Sub Judge-3rd, Patna in Title Suit No. 69 of 2006. =========================================================== Dilip Gupta & Anr. .... .... Plaintiffs-Appellants-Appellants Versus Debashish Palit & Ors. .... .... Defendants-Defendants-Respondents =========================================================== Appearance : For the Appellants : Mr. J.S. Arora, Advocate. Mr. Bhuwaneshwar Prasad, Advocate. For respondent No.1. : Mr. Ganpati Trivedi, Advocate. Mr. Madan Mohan, Advocate. Mr. R. K. Sinha No.2, Advocate. Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, Advocate. For respondent Nos. 10, 11 & 12 : Mr. Siddheshwari Prasad Sinha, Sr. Advocate. Mr. Srinandan Prasad Singh, Advocate. Mr. Krishan Kumar Sinha, Advocate with him. =========================================================== Coram: Honourable Mr. Justice Mungeshwar Sahoo Cav Judgment
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 522, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 511 }, { "end": 705, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 690 }, { "end": 948, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 938 }, { "end": 1021, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1002 }, { "end": 1102, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1087 }, { "end": 1178, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1167 }, { "end": 1254, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1243 }, { "end": 1342, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1324 }, { "end": 1434, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1409 }, { "end": 1526, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1504 }, { "end": 1611, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1592 }, { "end": 1759, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 1743 } ]
Petitioner: Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. Vs. Respondent: Commr. Of Income Tax, West Bengal, Calcutta Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 36, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 99, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 56 } ]
:1: In The High Court Of Karnataka At Bangalore Dated This The 27Th Day Of June 2012 Before The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice K.N.Keshavanarayana MFA.No.11358 Of 2008 (Mv) C/w MFA.No.1397 Of 2009 (Mv) In MFA.No.11358/08 Between: Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co.Ltd., No.105-A to 107-A, Cears Plaza, 136, Residency Road, Bangalore-560 025. Represented by its Senior Legal Executive Smt.Geetha Raj, R.O. Bangalore. ... Appellant [By Sri.D.Vijaya Kumar, Advocate] And: 1. Sri.B.R.Basavaraj, S/o Rudrappa Banakar, Aged about 35 years, Ayurvedic Doctor, (B.H.M.S.) Residing at Kundur Village, Honnali Taluk. 2. Sri.Shivappa.B., S/o Bharamappa, Aged about 43 years, Residing at Bisleri Village, Davangere Taluk. :2: 3. Sri.H.Mallikarjuna, S/o G.Halappa, Aged about 38 years, Residing at Lokikere Village, Near Vijaya Bank, Davangere Taluk. (Owner of M.C) ....Respondents [By Sri.V.Mahesha, Advocate for R-1; Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are served but unrepresented] This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under Section 173 (1) of Mv Act, against the judgment and award dated 25.10.2008 passed in Mvc No.189/2006 (Old No.641/2006) on the file of the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Harihar, awarding a compensation of Rs.2,01,000/- with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition till payment. In MFA.No.1397/09 Between: B.R.Basavaraj, S/o Rudrappa Banakar, Aged about 34 years, Ayurvedic Doctor, (B.H.M.S.) Residing at Kundur Village, Honnali Taluk, Davanagere. ....Appellant [By Sri.V.Mahesha for Sri.A.Hanumanthappa, Advocates] :3: And: 1. Shivappa.B., S/o Bharamappa, Driver of Motor Bike Bearing No.KA-17/V-632, Hero Honda Splendor, Residing at Bisleri Village, Davangere. 2. H.Mallikarjuna, S/o Halappa, Aged Major, Residing at Lokikere Village, Near Vijaya Bank, Davangere Taluk. (Owner of the vehicle Bearing No.KA-17/V-632, Hero Honda Splendor) 3. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co.Ltd., No.105-A, I Floor, Cears Plaza, 136, Residency Road, Bangalore. ...Respondents [By Sri.D.Vijaya Kumar, Advocate for R-3; Respondent No. 2 is served and unrepresented; Notice to R-1 is dispensed with vide order dated 6.3.2012] This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under Section 173 (1) of Mv Act, against the judgment and award dated 25.10.2008 passed in Mvc No.189/2006 (Old No.641/2006) on the file of the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Harihar, partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation. These Appeals coming for hearing on this day, the court delivered the following: :4: Judgment
[ { "end": 52, "label": "COURT", "start": 16 }, { "end": 183, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 164 }, { "end": 337, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 302 }, { "end": 554, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 540 }, { "end": 598, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 585 }, { "end": 773, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 762 }, { "end": 941, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 927 }, { "end": 1144, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1135 }, { "end": 1624, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1611 }, { "end": 1814, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1805 }, { "end": 1838, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1823 }, { "end": 1909, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1898 }, { "end": 2097, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2083 }, { "end": 2352, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2313 }, { "end": 2496, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2482 } ]
In The Court Of Ms. Vineeta Goyal, Additional District Judge ­ 01, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi District, New Delhi Rca No. 39/13 Unique Id no. 02403C0116362013 Dr. A.S. Beniwal C/o Beniwal Clinic Rz­35/F, Dada Chhatariwala Marg, New Delhi­110045. ......... Appellant Versus Family Planning Assn. Of India Through it's National President, Bajaj Bhawan, Nariman Point, Mumbai­40021. Also at Fpai Bhawan, Sector Iv, R.K. Puram, New Delhi­110022 .......Respondent Petition presented On : 30.07.2013 Arguments Heard On : 27.10.2014 Judgment Pronounced On : 05.11.2014 Appearance : Sh. Ajay Chaudhary, counsel for the Appellant. Sh. Asit Tiwari, counsel for the Respondent. Judgment
[ { "end": 33, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 20 }, { "end": 125, "label": "COURT", "start": 35 }, { "end": 191, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 179 }, { "end": 452, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 422 }, { "end": 977, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 963 }, { "end": 1062, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1051 } ]
Petitioner: The State Of Bombay And Another Vs. Respondent: F.N. Balsara Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 31, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 16 }, { "end": 76, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 64 } ]
-:1:- In The Court Of Ms. Manu Vedwan, Ld. Metropolitan Magistrate : Special Court - 05 (Ni Act) : Dwarka : Delhi Seniors Builders Ltd Vs. Shourya Towers Pvt Ltd & another Complaint Case No. 97/14 P.S. : R. K. Puram U/s. : 138 N.I.Act J U D G M E N T
[ { "end": 44, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 33 }, { "end": 126, "label": "COURT", "start": 46 }, { "end": 149, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 129 }, { "end": 176, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 154 } ]
1 Reportable In The Supreme Court Of India Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Civil Appeal No. 5733 Of 2008 (Arising out of Slp [C] No.12056 of 2007) National Insurance Co. Ltd. ... Appellant Vs. M/s. Boghara Polyfab Pvt. Ltd. ... Respondents Judgment
[ { "end": 131, "label": "COURT", "start": 109 }, { "end": 320, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 293 }, { "end": 393, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 368 } ]
In The Court Of Shri Ravinder Singh­Ii Metropolitan Magistrate Dwarka Courts, New Delhi Case No. : 5051/14 Unique Case Id No. : 02405R0107502011 Om Parkash Bhardwaj S/o Sh. Daya Kishan R/o Wz­199E, Raj Nagar, Part­II, Near Gupta Hardware, Palam Colony, New Delhi­110045. .................................................Complainant Versus Geeta Rani W/o Sh. Ashok Kumar R/o Rz­239D­208A, Old Gurdwara Dda Park Road, Raj Nagar Part­II, Palam Colony, NewDelhi­110045. Also at: Geeta Rani W/o Ct. Ashok Kumar Belt No. 3382/Dap, Pis No. 28031624, First Batallian, Dcp Recruitment Cell, New Police Line, Kingsway Camp, Delhi. Also at: C/o Sh. Ramesh S/o Sh. Tek Chand Village Chhoti Goond (Khark Boon), Teshsil & Distt. Bhiwani, Haryana. Also at: C/o Sh. Anil Singh Namberdar S/o Sh. Viza Singh Village Kanti, Teshsil Narnaul, Distt. Mahendergarh, Haryana........................................Accused Date of Institution: 23.02.2011 Plea of the accused: Pleaded Not Guilty Date of Reserving Judgment: 19/07/2014 Sentence or final Order: Convicted Date of Judgment: 23/08/2014 Cc No. 5051/14 Om Parkash Bhardwaj Vs. Geeta Rani Page No. 13/13 Judgment
[ { "end": 38, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 21 }, { "end": 135, "label": "COURT", "start": 63 }, { "end": 214, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 195 }, { "end": 447, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 437 }, { "end": 1491, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1472 }, { "end": 1506, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1496 } ]
Before The Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court Dated: 20/07/2011 Coram The Honourable Mr. Justice Vinod K. Sharma Writ Petition(MD)No.5859 of 2008 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2009 M/s. Vicnivaas Agency, 289-D, Sivanthakulam Road, Tuticorin - 628 003, Represented by its Partner Shri. T.P.S.Ponkumaran ...... Petitioner Vs 1. Shri N. K. Raghupathi I.A.S., Now working as Additional Secretary & Financial Adviser, Department of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi - 110 001 Residing at C-Ii/80, Bapa Nagar, New Delhi - 110 001. 2. The Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to the Government, Department of Shipping (Ports Wing), Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport and Highways, Parivahan Bhawan, 1, Parliament Street, New Delhi - 110 001. 3. V O C Port Trust, formerly Tuticorin Port Trust, represented by its Chairman, Tuticorin. ...... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Declaration, (a) declaring that the actions of the first respondent caused against the petitioner viz., demolishing their property and suspension of stevedoring license are unlawful, ultra vires, mala fide, arbitrary, unreasonable, unjust, perverse and vindictive, and therefore violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and unconstitutional; (b) declaring that the actions of the first respondent caused against the petitioner are in contravention to the All India Service (Conduct) Rules 1968; (c) directing the first respondent to pay Rs.3 crores with interest from this date to the petitioner firm for causing monetary loss, harassment, mental agony, and hardship; (d) directing the second respondent to take appropriate steps with the concerned Government Departments for payment of the above amount to the petitioner from the first respondent's account committing misuse of office and abuse of power and for infringing the fundamental rights of the petitioner. !For Petitioner ... Mr. N. Dilip Kumar ^For Respondents... Mr. V. T. Gopalan Senior Counsel for Mr. R. Sathish Kumar for R-1 Mr. K. K. Senthilvelan for R-2 Assistant Solicitor General of India Mr. S. Yashwanth for R-3 - - - - - - - - :Order
[ { "end": 45, "label": "COURT", "start": 11 }, { "end": 115, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 100 }, { "end": 197, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 181 }, { "end": 347, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 331 }, { "end": 620, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 606 }, { "end": 880, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 864 }, { "end": 2090, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2076 }, { "end": 2129, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2116 }, { "end": 2182, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2166 }, { "end": 2220, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2202 }, { "end": 2296, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2284 } ]
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam WP(C).No. 1016 of 2010(B) 1. Mary Ulahannan, Proprietor, ... Petitioner Vs 1. Union Of India, ... Respondent 2. State Of Kerala, 3. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., 4. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., 5. Bharath Petroleum Corporation Ltd., 6. District Collector, Ernakulam. 7. Tahsildar, Muvattupuzha. 8. Executive Engineer, For Petitioner :Sri.Alias M.Cherian For Respondent :Sri.T.P.M.Ibrahim Khan,Asst.S.G Of Indi The Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon Dated :23/05/2011 O R D E R (Cr.) P.R. Ramachandra Menon J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P (C) Nos. 1016, 1017, 1564, 3349, 3360, 3371, 5895, 7362, 25211, 25590 27176, 27236, 30337, 30650, 30651, 33944, 37417, 38283 of 2010, 652, 656, 1254, 2159, 2427, 3373, 3471, 4071, 4863, 5034, 6257, 7159, 7197 of 2011 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 23rd day of May, 2011 Judgment
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 87, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 73 }, { "end": 187, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 173 }, { "end": 252, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 237 }, { "end": 294, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 258 }, { "end": 327, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 300 }, { "end": 367, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 333 }, { "end": 403, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 373 }, { "end": 432, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 408 }, { "end": 455, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 437 }, { "end": 510, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 495 }, { "end": 567, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 549 }, { "end": 631, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 610 }, { "end": 749, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 727 } ]
Petitioner: Pandurang Dhoni Chougule Vs. Respondent: Maruti Hari Jadhav Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 36, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 74, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 56 } ]
1 In The Court Of Ms. Barkha Gupta : Judge : Mact : (North West District) Delhi Mact No. : 112/08 Unique Id No. : 02404C0196292008 Amita Sharma w/o Sh. Sanjay Sharma, R/o Wa­19/20, Shakarpur, Delhi­92. .....(Petitioner) Versus 1. Sh.Virender Singh ... (he was the driver cum owner of the offending vehicle/R1 who had expired during trial and following persons are impleaded as his LRs). a) Sumitra W/o Sh. Ishwar Singh b) Mrs. Urmila W/o Late Virender Singh c) Ms. Preeti D/o Late Virender Singh d) Ms. Sushmita D/o Late Virender Singh e) Master Tushant S/o Late Virender Singh All R/o Village Jakhoda, Tehsil Bahadurgarh, Distt. Jhajjar, Haryana. (Respondent Nos. C to E are minors, who are being represented by their mother and natural guardian Mrs. Urmila) 2. The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Regd. Oriental House, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi­110002. .......(Insurer/Respondent No.2) Mact No.112/08 Amita Sharma v. Sumitra 1 of 28 Other details:­ Date Of Institution : 30.01.2008 Date Of Reserving Order : 27.08.2014 Date Of Pronouncement :30.08.2014 Award/Judgment
[ { "end": 36, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 24 }, { "end": 170, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 158 }, { "end": 331, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 317 }, { "end": 1141, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1110 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature For Rajasthan At Jaipur Bench Jaipur 1. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2772/2012 Ambuja Cements Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Commission 2. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2850/2007 Raj.Textile Mills Asso. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Commission 3. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5128/2007 M/s Shree Cement Ltd. V/s State of Rajasthan & ors. 4. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5270/2007 M/s Dcm Shriram . V/s State of Rajasthan & ors. Consolidated Ltd. Reportable 5. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5151/2008 M/s Binani Cement Ltd. V/s Union of India & ors. 6. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11285/2008 M/s J.K.Lakshmi Cement V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Ltd. Commission 7. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11288/2008 M/s Aditya Cement V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Commission 8. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7616/2009 M/s Manglam Cement Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Commission 9. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7622/2009 M/s Lucid Colloids Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Commission 10. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9781/2009 M/s Shriram Rayons Kota V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Commission 11. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9783/2009 Ambuja Cements Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Commission 12. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10219/2009 Grasim Industries Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Commission 13. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11072/2009 Hindustan Copper Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Commission 14. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11073/2009 J.K.Tyre & Industries Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Commission 15. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14510/2009 Chambal Fertilisers and V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Chemicals Ltd. Commission 16. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14575/2009 Grasim Industries Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Commission 17. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4589/2011 The Raj.Textile Mills Asso. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Commission 18. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6517/2011 M/s J.K.Lakshmi Cement V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Ltd. Commission 19. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6518/2011 Hindustan Cooper Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Commission 20. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6519/2011 Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Commission 21. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6520/2011 Chambal Fertilisers and V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Chemicals Ltd. Commission 22. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6521/2011 M/s Lucid Colloids Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Commission 23. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6877/2011 J.K.Tyre & Industries Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Commission 24. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7343/2011 Ultratech Cement Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Commission 25. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7344/2011 Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Commission 26. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10911/2011 M/s Hindustan Zinc Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Commission 27. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10912/2011 M/s Shriram Rayons Kota V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Commission 28. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10913/2011 M/s Manglam Cement Ltd. V/s Raj.Electricity Regulatory Commission Date when the order was reserved :- 21.8.2012 Date of pronouncement of order :- 31.8.2012 Present Hon'ble the Chief Justice Mr.Arun Mishra Hon'ble Mr.Justice Narendra Kumar Jain-I Mr.P.N.Bhandari ) Mr.Kamlakar Sharma, Sr.Counsel with ) Ms.Alankrita Sharma ) Mr.Sudhir Gupta,Sr.Counsel with )-for the petitioners. Mr.Sachin Mehta ) Mr.Virendra Lodha, Sr.Counsel with ) Mr.Ankit Jain ) Mr.Bipin Gupta ) Mr.Pradeep Kalwania )-for the respondents. Order
[ { "end": 69, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 132, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 113 }, { "end": 164, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 138 }, { "end": 248, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 225 }, { "end": 297, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 254 }, { "end": 362, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 345 }, { "end": 386, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 368 }, { "end": 459, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 448 }, { "end": 485, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 467 }, { "end": 588, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 570 }, { "end": 607, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 593 }, { "end": 687, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 669 }, { "end": 725, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 693 }, { "end": 802, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 789 }, { "end": 852, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 809 }, { "end": 919, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 900 }, { "end": 967, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 924 }, { "end": 1034, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1015 }, { "end": 1082, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1039 }, { "end": 1150, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1131 }, { "end": 1198, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1155 }, { "end": 1262, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1243 }, { "end": 1310, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1267 }, { "end": 1379, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1356 }, { "end": 1427, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1384 }, { "end": 1494, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1472 }, { "end": 1542, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1499 }, { "end": 1615, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1588 }, { "end": 1663, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1620 }, { "end": 1728, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1709 }, { "end": 1765, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1739 }, { "end": 1863, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1840 }, { "end": 1911, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1868 }, { "end": 1981, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1959 }, { "end": 2030, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1987 }, { "end": 2097, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 2079 }, { "end": 2150, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2103 }, { "end": 2216, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 2195 }, { "end": 2264, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2221 }, { "end": 2331, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 2309 }, { "end": 2379, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2336 }, { "end": 2443, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 2424 }, { "end": 2479, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2453 }, { "end": 2581, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 2562 }, { "end": 2629, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2586 }, { "end": 2700, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 2674 }, { "end": 2748, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2705 }, { "end": 2815, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 2793 }, { "end": 2863, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2820 }, { "end": 2931, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 2908 }, { "end": 2979, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2936 }, { "end": 3047, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 3028 }, { "end": 3095, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 3052 }, { "end": 3164, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 3145 }, { "end": 3213, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 3170 }, { "end": 3282, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 3263 }, { "end": 3330, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 3287 }, { "end": 3507, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 3496 }, { "end": 3547, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 3528 }, { "end": 3566, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 3554 }, { "end": 3591, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 3576 }, { "end": 3630, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 3614 }, { "end": 3651, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 3639 }, { "end": 3708, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 3696 }, { "end": 3734, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 3720 }, { "end": 3768, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 3758 }, { "end": 3789, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 3778 }, { "end": 3815, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 3799 } ]
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam Crl A No. 282 of 1999() 1. Gemini ... Petitioner Vs 1. Chandran ... Respondent For Petitioner :Sri.C.J.Joy For Respondent :Public Prosecutor The Hon'ble Mrs. Justice K.Hema Dated :14/07/2006 O R D E R K.Hema, J. -------------------------------------------------- Crl. A. No. 282 Of 1999-B -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of July, 2006 J U D G M E N T
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 78, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 72 }, { "end": 157, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 149 }, { "end": 247, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 240 }, { "end": 332, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 326 }, { "end": 411, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 405 } ]
Petitioner: Workmen Of M/S Hindustan Lever Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Respondent: Management Of M/S Hindusian Lever Ltd. Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 47, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 112, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 74 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Patna Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7321 of 2015 =========================================================== Rakesh Kumar Sah Son of Gajendra Prasad Sah, resident of village- Roshana Bazar, Post Office + Police Station- Pranpur, District- Katihar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Petroleum & Natural Gas, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi 2. The Secretary, Department of Petroleum & Natural Gas, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi 3. The Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Corporate Office, lot No. 3079/3, Sadia Nagar, J.B. Tito Marg, New Delhi- 110049 through its Chairman 4. The Chairman, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Corporate Office, lot No. 3079/3, Sadia Nagar, J.B. Tito Marg, New Delhi- 110049 5. The Director (Marketing), Indian Oil Corporation Limited, G-9, Ali Yavar Jung Marg, Bandra (East), Mumbai- 400051 6. The General Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Marketing Division), Bihar State Office, Loknayak Jaiprakash Bhawan (5th Floor), Dak Bunglow Chowk, Patna- 800001 7. The Senior Divisional Sales Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, (Marketing Division), Begusarai Divisional Office, P.O. Barauni Oil Refinery, District- Begusarai (Bihar) 851114 8. The Manager (Refinery Coordination) Barauni Marketing Terminal, Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Marketing Division), Begusarai, Bihar- 854114 9. The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Katihar 10. The District Magistrate Katihar 11. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Katihar 12. The Circle Officer, Pranpur, District- Katihar 13. Sri Satish Prasad, son of not known the then Circle Officer, Pranpur, District- Katihar 14. Sri Binod Kumar Gupta, son of Rameshwar Lal Gupta, of Village- Mahadeopur, P.O.- Mahadeopur, P.S.- Pranpur, District- Katihar 15. Sri Jeewan Lal Agarwal, Son of Biseshwar Lal Agrawal, resident of village- Mahadeopur, P.O. Mahadeopur, P.S.- Pranpur, District- Katihar .... .... Respondent/s with =========================================================== Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9456 of 2015 =========================================================== Jiwan Lal Agrawal Son of Sri Biseshwar Lal Agrawal, resident of Village + P.O.- Mahadevpur, P.S.- Pranpur, District- Katihar. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Corporate Office, Lot No. 3079/3 Sadia Nagar, J.B. Tito Marg, New Delhi-110049 through its Chairman. 2. The Chairman, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Corporate Office, Lot No. 3079/3, New Delhi-110049. 3. The Director (Marketing), Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Indian Oil Bhawan, G-9, Patna High Court Cwjc No.7321 of 2015 dt.18-09-2017 2 Aliyavar Jung Marg, Bandar (East), Mumbai- 400051. 4. The General Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (Marketing Division), Bihar State Office, Lok Nayak Jaiprakash Bhawan, 5th Floor, Dak Bunglow Chowk, Patna-800001. 5. The Chief Manager (R.S.), Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Bihar State Office, Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Bhawan 5th, Floor, Dak Banglow Chowk, Patna. 6. The Senior Divisional Sales Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.(Marketing Division), Begusarai Divisional office, P.O.- Barauni Oil Refinary, District- Begusarai (Bihar). 7. The Manager (Reginary Coordination), Barauni Marketing Terminal, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.(Marketing Division), Begusarai (Bihar). 8. The Circle Officer, Bihar, Patna. 9. Binod Kumar Gupta Son of not known, resident of Village + P.O. Mahadevpur, P.S.- Pranpur, District- Katihar. 10. Rakesh Kumar Sah Son of Gajendra Prasad Sah, resident of Roshana Bazar, P.O. + P.S.- Pranpur, District- Katihar .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance : (In Cwjc No.7321 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, Adv. Mr. Piyush Saurav, Adv. For the Iocl : Mr. Anil Kumar Jha, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sanat Kr. Misha, Adv. For the Resp. No.14 : Mr. Dhirendra Kr. Jha, Adv. Mr. Jibendra Mishra, Adv. For the Resp. No.15 : Mr. Bhola Prasad, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kr. Jha, Adv. Mr. Rajendra Narayan, Adv. For the State : Mr. S.S. Prasad- Sc8 Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Ac to Sc-8 (In Cwjc No.9456 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajendra Narayan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kr. Jha, Adv. Mr. Bhola Prasad, Adv. For Ioc : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Adv. Mr. Amlesh Kumar Verma, Adv. For the Resp. No. 9 : Mr. Dhirendra Kr. Jha, Adv. For the State : Mr. Binay Kumar, Ac to Sc-10 =========================================================== Coram: Honourable Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey Oral Judgment
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 180, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 164 }, { "end": 353, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 339 }, { "end": 524, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 449 }, { "end": 562, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 532 }, { "end": 795, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 673 }, { "end": 912, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 803 }, { "end": 1082, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 920 }, { "end": 1267, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1090 }, { "end": 1412, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1275 }, { "end": 1434, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1420 }, { "end": 1511, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1484 }, { "end": 1558, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1520 }, { "end": 1609, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1567 }, { "end": 1631, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1618 }, { "end": 1728, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1711 }, { "end": 1859, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1841 }, { "end": 2186, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 2169 }, { "end": 2358, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2331 }, { "end": 2559, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2469 }, { "end": 2659, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2569 }, { "end": 2917, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2758 }, { "end": 3063, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2928 }, { "end": 3241, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 3075 }, { "end": 3379, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 3253 }, { "end": 3420, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 3392 }, { "end": 3445, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 3428 }, { "end": 3560, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 3544 }, { "end": 3826, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 3806 }, { "end": 3853, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 3840 }, { "end": 3916, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 3902 }, { "end": 3983, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 3968 }, { "end": 4048, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4031 }, { "end": 4111, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4096 }, { "end": 4171, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4159 }, { "end": 4233, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4219 }, { "end": 4297, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4281 }, { "end": 4357, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4345 }, { "end": 4416, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4404 }, { "end": 4510, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4494 }, { "end": 4542, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4528 }, { "end": 4568, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4556 }, { "end": 4634, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4618 }, { "end": 4700, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4682 }, { "end": 4765, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4748 }, { "end": 4824, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4813 }, { "end": 4943, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 4929 } ]
W.P.1342/15 1 High Court Of Madhya Pradesh Bench At Gwalior Justice Sujoy Paul. Writ Petition No.1342/15 Jai Prakash Agrawal Vs. Anand Agrawal & Ors. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri D.D.Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri K.S.Tomar, Senior Advocate with Shri J.S.Kaurav, Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 3. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order
[ { "end": 137, "label": "COURT", "start": 64 }, { "end": 180, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 170 }, { "end": 282, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 263 }, { "end": 365, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 352 }, { "end": 476, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 466 }, { "end": 521, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 512 }, { "end": 559, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 549 } ]
Petitioner: Shyam Sunder Agarwal & Co. Vs. Respondent: Union Of India. Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 38, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 72, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 58 } ]
1 R In The High Court Of Karnataka At Bangalore Dated This The 7th Day Of December 2012 Before The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar M.F.A.No.7665 Of 2008 (Mv) C/W M.F.A No.491 Of 2009(Mv) Mfa.No.7665 Of 2008 Between: Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation Central Office K.H. Double Road Shanthinagar Bangalore By Its Managing Director ...Appellant (By Sri: D. Vijayakumar, Adv., ) And: 1. Sri. B.N. Nagesh S/O. Sri. Narasimha Shastry Aged About 52 Years 2. Smt. Kamala W/O. Sri B.N. Nagesh Aged About 47 Years 2 Both Are R/O. No.18/450 Neera Ganthi Street Ananthapura Old Town Koteshwara Rao Andhrapradesh .....Respondents (By Sri: R. Chandrashekar, Adv., For M/S Lawyers Net, For R1 & 2) -------- This Mfa Is Filed Under Section 173(1) Of M.V. Act Against The Judgment And Award Dated 28.3.2008 Passed In Mvc No.4185/2006 On The File Of The Vi Addl. Judge, Court Of Small Causes, Member, Mact, Metropolitan Area, Bangalroe (Scch.No.2), Awarding A Compensation Of Rs.9,15,000/- With Interest At 7% P.A. From The Date Of Petition Till Deposit. M.F.A.No.491 Of 2009 Between: 1. B.N. Nagesh S/O. Narasimha Shastry Aged About 53 Years 2. Kamala W/O. B.N. Nagesh Aged About 48 Years Both Are R/O. No.18/450 Neera Ganthi Street Ananthapura Old Town Koteshwara Rao Andhrapradesh ......Appellants 3 (By Sri: R. Chandrashekar, Adv., Form/S. Lawyers Net,) And:- The Managing Director B.M.T.C K.H. Road Shanthinagar Bangalore-560 027. .....Respondent (By Sri: D. Vijaykumar, Adv.,) -------- This Mfa Is Filed Under Section 173(1) Of M.V. Act Against The Judgment And Award Dated 28.3.2008 Passed In Mvc No.4185/2006 On The File Of The Vi Addl. Scj & Member, Mact, Bangalore Parly Allowing The Claim Petition For Compensation And Seeking Enhancement Of Compensation. These MFAs Coming On For Admission This Day, The Court Delivered The Following: Judgment
[ { "end": 101, "label": "COURT", "start": 65 }, { "end": 227, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 214 }, { "end": 415, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 371 }, { "end": 547, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 533 }, { "end": 585, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 574 }, { "end": 661, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 655 }, { "end": 898, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 882 }, { "end": 1384, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1373 }, { "end": 1450, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1444 }, { "end": 1592, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1579 }, { "end": 1686, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1670 }, { "end": 1796, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1729 }, { "end": 1853, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1840 } ]
Petitioner: Consumer Education & Research Centre And Others Vs. Respondent: Union Of India & Others Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 48, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 93, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 79 } ]
Petitioner: Tilokchand Motichand & Ors. Vs. Respondent: H.B. Munshi & Anr. Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 32, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 70, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 59 } ]
Petitioner: Motor General Traders & Anr. Etc. Etc. Vs. Respondent: State Of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. Etc. Etc. Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 33, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 93, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 70 } ]
Case No.: Appeal (crl.) 336 of 1996 Petitioner: Uday Respondent: State of Karnataka Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 54, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 50 }, { "end": 86, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 68 } ]
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam CRL.A.No. 1338 of 2010() 1. Sasikumar, Aged 42 Years, ... Petitioner 2. Gopi, Aged 48 Years, S/O.Krishnan, Vs 1. The State Of Kerala, ... Respondent For Petitioner :Sri.V.Sethunath For Respondent : No Appearance The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.K.Mohanan Dated :04/08/2011 O R D E R V.K.Mohanan, J. ---------------------------------------- Crl.A.Nos. 1338 & 2198 of 2010 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 81, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 72 }, { "end": 143, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 139 }, { "end": 227, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 212 }, { "end": 322, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 311 }, { "end": 408, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 397 }, { "end": 479, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 468 } ]
Petitioner: Satyadhyan Ghosal And Others Vs. Respondent: Sm. Deorajin Debi And Another. Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 29, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 77, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 64 } ]
Appeal 991 Of 2008.doc In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Criminal Appeal No.991 Of 2008 Yashwant Hiraman Thakare ... Appellant v/s The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ---------------------------------- Mrs. Sonia Miskin, advocate appointed for Appellant. Mrs. G. P. Mulekar, App for State. ---------------------------------- Coram: V.K.Tahilramani & B.P. Colabawalla, Jj. Reserved On : 7th May, 2015 Pronounced On : 8th May, 2015 Judgment
[ { "end": 78, "label": "COURT", "start": 44 }, { "end": 398, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 374 }, { "end": 479, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 459 }, { "end": 637, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 625 }, { "end": 722, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 709 }, { "end": 866, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 851 }, { "end": 920, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 904 } ]
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam Bail Appl..No. 4229 of 2008() 1. Santhosh Madhavan @ Amrutha Chaithanya ... Petitioner Vs 1. Circle Inspector Of Police ... Respondent 2. State Of Kerala, Rep. By Its For Petitioner :Sri.S.Gopakumaran Nair (Sr.) For Respondent :Public Prosecutor The Hon'ble Mrs. Justice K.Hema Dated :21/07/2008 O R D E R
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 115, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 77 }, { "end": 214, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 188 }, { "end": 278, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 263 }, { "end": 348, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 330 }, { "end": 439, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 433 } ]
Petitioner: Shankarsan Dash Vs. Respondent: Union Of India Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 27, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 61, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 47 } ]
In The Court Of Sh. Brijesh Kumar Garg; Special Judge:Cbi­01: Central: Delhi Criminal Appeal No. 1/2014 Case Id No. 02401R0178422014 1. Prem Dutta 2. Smt. Santosh Dutta W/o Sh. Prem Dutta Both r/o Gf 13 B/1, Malka Ganj, Delhi­110 007 .......Appellants Vs. 1. Monika Dutta, W/o Sh. Punit Dutta, R/o Ff 13 B/1, Malka Ganj, New Delhi ........Respondent Date of filing : 19.04.2014 Date of order: 23.07.2014 O R D E R
[ { "end": 38, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 20 }, { "end": 86, "label": "COURT", "start": 50 }, { "end": 160, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 150 }, { "end": 182, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 169 }, { "end": 385, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 373 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras Dated: 08.04.2011 Coram: The Hon'ble Mr.Justice T.S.Sivagnanam W.P.Nos. 7609 of 2001 and 26466 of 2001 W.P.No.26466 of 2001 R.Ramakrishnan  Petitioner Vs. 1.The Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New Delhi rep. by its Registrar, 4th Floor, Lok Nayak Bhavan, Khan Market, New Delhi. 2.The Competent Authority, Smugglers, Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Properties) Act, 1976 and Narcotic Drugs Psychotropic Substance Act, 69/1, G.N.Chetty Street, Chennai  600017.  RespondentsW.P.No.7609 of 2001 Mohammed Thaha Umma (Deceased) 1.S.S.A. Hayarunisha 2.S.S.A. Sheik Kamal 3.S.S.A. Aminath Fathima 4.S.S.A. Ayshath Zulaiha 5.S.S.A. Seyed Anifa 6.S.S.A. Husain Jalal 7.S.S.A. Kathija Rilwana 8.S.S.A. Basheer  Petitioners P1 to P8 substituted as LRs in the place of the deceased petitioner vide court order dated 24.03.2011 in W.P.M.P.No.104/11. Vs. 1.Competent Authoirty, Smugglers, Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Properties) Act, Chennai. 2.Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New Delhi.  Respondents Prayer in W.P.No.26466 of 2001:- Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent dated 01.10.2001 in F.P.A.No.70/MDS/98 and the order of the second respondent dated 28.09.1998 in F.No.OCA/MDS/2846/94 and quash the same. Prayer in W.P.No.7609 of 2001:- Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the second respondent the Appellate Tribunal for forfeited Property, New Delhi in the order dated 31.01.2001 made in FPA.No.66/MDS/95 confirming the findings of the Competent Authority, Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, Chennai in Oca/Mds/348-352/76 dated 02.02.2000 and quash the same. For Petitioner :Mr.Rahul Balaji for M/s.Sathish Parasaran in W.P.No.26466 of 2001 Mr.B.Kumar Senior counsel for R.Loganathan in W.P.7609/01 For Respondents:Mr.M.L.Ramesh Senior Standing counsel for Rr1-2 Mr.S.Haja Mohideen Gisti Senior Standing counsel for Rr1-2 C O M M O N O R D E R
[ { "end": 41, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 110, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 96 }, { "end": 190, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 176 }, { "end": 261, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 220 }, { "end": 570, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 365 }, { "end": 661, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 641 }, { "end": 682, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 662 }, { "end": 707, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 683 }, { "end": 732, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 708 }, { "end": 753, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 733 }, { "end": 775, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 754 }, { "end": 800, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 776 }, { "end": 817, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 801 }, { "end": 1067, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 964 }, { "end": 1112, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1069 }, { "end": 2027, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2015 }, { "end": 2109, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2102 }, { "end": 2189, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2179 }, { "end": 2248, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2227 } ]
Petitioner: Mrs. Rekha Chaturvedi Vs. Respondent: University Of Rajasthan And Ors. Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 34, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 18 }, { "end": 77, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 54 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras Dated: 25.07.2014 Coram The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice V.Dhanapalan and The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice G.Chockalingam C.M.A.No.3215 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Motor Third Party Claims Office, No.45, Moore Street, Chennai-600 001. ... Appellant / 2nd Respondent -vs- 1. R.Kala 2. Minor R.Sudhan 3. Minor R.Edhan 4. Vellaithai 5. M.Muthu ... Respondents / Petitioners 6. P.Ramesh Kumar ... Respondent / 1st Respondent Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act against the Decree and the judgment passed in M.C.O.P.No.4505 of 2006 dated 03.02.2012, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Small Causes Court, Chennai. For Appellant : Mr.R.Neethi Perumal For R1 to R5 : Mr.F.Terry Chellaraja For R6 : Given Up ***** J U D G M E N T
[ { "end": 41, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 101, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 89 }, { "end": 143, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 129 }, { "end": 221, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 193 }, { "end": 341, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 335 }, { "end": 359, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 351 }, { "end": 376, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 369 }, { "end": 390, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 380 }, { "end": 401, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 394 }, { "end": 449, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 435 }, { "end": 773, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 757 }, { "end": 813, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 795 } ]
20 *In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi + MAC.APP.No.422/2009 Date of Decision: 23rd February, 2010 % Sobat Singh ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kishan Nautiyal, Advocate. versus Ramesh Chandra Gupta & Anr. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Atul Nanda, Ms. Rameeza, Mr.Sumeer and Ms. Sugandha, Advocates for Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. with Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Manager. Mr. Atul Nanda, Ms. Rameeza, Mr.Sumeer and Ms. Sugandha, Advocates for Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. with Mr.Gaurab Gaba, Manager. Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa and Ms. Harsh Lata, Advocates for Oriental Insurance Company Limited. Ms. Anjali Bansal, Advocate for Tata Aig General Insurance Co. Ltd., Bharti Axa General Insurance Co. Ltd. and Future Generali India Insurance Co. Ltd. Mr. Sunil Kapoor and Mr. Anuraj Sharma, Advocates for Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. Mr. S.L. Gupta, Advocate for National Insurance Company with Mr. Santosh K. Sood, Manager, Dro-I and Mr. N. Wadhwan, Asst. Manager, Dro-Ii. Ms. Adarsh Sabharwal, Adv. for Raheja Qbe General Insurance Co. Ltd. Ms. Shantha Devi Raman with Mr. Amit Maihen, Advocates for Iffco Tokyo General Insurance Co. Ltd. Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate for Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., Universal Sompo General Insurance co. Ltd. and Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co.Ltd. Mr. Kanwal Choudahary, Adv. for R-2. MAC.APP.No.422/2009 Page 1 of 21 Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate for United Insurance Company with Mr. Harish Choudhary, Deputy Manager and Mr. Sanjeev Negi, Admn. Officer. Mr. O.P. Mannie, Amicus Curiae. Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate for Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Co. Ltd. Coram :- The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice J.R. Midha 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may Yes be allowed to see the Judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes 3. Whether the judgment should be Yes reported in the Digest? Judgment
[ { "end": 43, "label": "COURT", "start": 11 }, { "end": 181, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 170 }, { "end": 273, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 258 }, { "end": 342, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 322 }, { "end": 410, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 400 }, { "end": 423, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 416 }, { "end": 457, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 451 }, { "end": 474, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 466 }, { "end": 669, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 659 }, { "end": 682, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 675 }, { "end": 716, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 710 }, { "end": 733, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 725 }, { "end": 931, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 916 }, { "end": 973, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 940 }, { "end": 1088, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1075 }, { "end": 1354, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1342 }, { "end": 1399, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1363 }, { "end": 1512, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1502 }, { "end": 1750, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1734 }, { "end": 1890, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1872 }, { "end": 1934, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1923 }, { "end": 2049, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2038 }, { "end": 2326, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2309 }, { "end": 2460, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2447 }, { "end": 2710, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2699 }, { "end": 2771, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2760 }, { "end": 2932, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 2922 } ]
In The Court Of Sh. R. B Singh Additional District Judge ­01 (West): Delhi Rca No. 25/12 Id No. 02401C0156802012 1. Sh. Surinder Narang S/o Sh. J. C Narang 2. Smt. Janak Narang W/o Sh. Surinder Narang, Both residents of : A­72, Yojna Vihar, Delhi - 110092. ..... Appellants Versus Smt. Madhu Rani W/o Sh. J. C Narang, A­72, Yojna Vihar, Delhi - 110092. ....Respondent Date of Institution : 07.04.2012 Date of arguments heard : 19.12.2014 Date of Decision : 23.12.2014 J U D G M E N T
[ { "end": 30, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 20 }, { "end": 75, "label": "COURT", "start": 32 }, { "end": 187, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 172 }, { "end": 240, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 228 }, { "end": 491, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 481 } ]
The Honble Sri Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao And The Honble Mrs. Justice Anis Writ Petition No.16943 of 2015 26-10-2015 Hameeda Begum W/o Sri Hamza Bin Omer @ Zaffer Pehalwan R/o H.No.18-7-418/4, Rahmath Nagar Yakuthpura, Hyderabad . Petitoner State of Telangana Rep. by its Secretary Home Department Secretariat, Hyderabad and 5 others Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Ch. Siddhartha Sarma Counsel for the Respondents :G.P for Home, State of Telangana <Gist: >Head Note: ? Citations: 1. Air 1966 Sc 740 2. (1969) 2 Scr 635 = (Air) 1970 Sc 852 3. (1970) 3 Scc 746 4. (1972) 3 Scc 831 5. Air 1972 Sc 1749 6. Air 1975 Sc 1215 7. 1982 (2) Scc 403 The Honble Sri Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao And The Honble Mrs. Justice Anis Writ Petition No.16943 of 2015 Order
[ { "end": 43, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 23 }, { "end": 76, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 72 }, { "end": 160, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 147 }, { "end": 301, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 283 }, { "end": 443, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 423 }, { "end": 751, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 731 }, { "end": 784, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 780 } ]
Reportable In The Supreme Court Of India Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Criminal Appeal No. 1750 Of 2008 Hardeep Singh …Appellant Versus State of Punjab & Ors. …Respondents With Criminal Appeal No. 1751 of 2008 Manjit Pal Singh …Appellant Versus State of Punjab & Anr. …Respondents With Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 9184 of 2008 Babubhai Bhimabhai Bokhiria & Anr. …Appellants Versus State of Gujarat & Ors. …Respondents With Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 7209 of 2010 Rajendra Sharma & Anr. …Appellants Versus State of M.P. & Anr. …Respondents With Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 5724 of 2009 Ravinder Kumar & Anr. …Appellants Versus State of Haryana & Ors. …Respondents With Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 5975 of 2009 Tej Pal & Anr. …Appellants Versus State of Haryana & Ors. …Respondents With Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 9040 of 2010 Juned Pahalwan …Appellant Versus State of U.P.& Anr. …Respondents With Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 5331 of 2009 Rajesh @ Sanjai …Appellant Versus State of U.P. & Anr. …Respondents With Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 9157 of 2009 Ramdhan Mali & Anr. …Appellants Versus State of Rajasthan & Anr. …Respondents With Special Leave Petition (Crl.) Nos. 4503-4504 of 2012 Tej Singh …Appellant Versus State of U.P. …Respondent J U D G M E N T
[ { "end": 68, "label": "COURT", "start": 46 }, { "end": 205, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 192 }, { "end": 288, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 273 }, { "end": 433, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 417 }, { "end": 520, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 505 }, { "end": 686, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 659 }, { "end": 781, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 765 }, { "end": 943, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 928 }, { "end": 1035, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1022 }, { "end": 1192, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1178 }, { "end": 1285, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1269 }, { "end": 1436, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1429 }, { "end": 1528, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1512 }, { "end": 1682, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1668 }, { "end": 1763, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1750 }, { "end": 1913, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1898 }, { "end": 1994, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1981 }, { "end": 2140, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 2128 }, { "end": 2234, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2216 }, { "end": 2385, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 2376 }, { "end": 2466, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2453 } ]
Petitioner: Smt. Rashmi Kumar Vs. Respondent: Mahesh Kumar Bhada Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 29, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 17 }, { "end": 67, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 49 } ]
Petitioner: State Of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Respondent: Singhara Singh And Others Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 34, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 68, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 54 } ]
Before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Bangalore (Scch-8) Present: Shri P.J. Somashekar B.A., Ll.B., Xii Additional Small Causes Judge and Member, M.A.C.T., Bangalore. Dated this the 14th day of September 2015 M.V.C. Nos.217/2015 to 219/2015 Petitioner in Mvc Sri V. Pushparaj, 217/2015 S/o M. Vargees, Aged about 42 years, Residing at No.18, 7th Main, 1st Cross, Bharathi Layout, S.G. Palya, Bangalore - 560 029. (Sri G.N. Subramani, Advocate) Petitioner in Mvc Sri Gopal Krishna P., 218/2015 S/o P. Ramanujam, Aged about 46 years, Residing at No.3155, 2nd Cross, Gayathrinagar, Bangalore - 560 021. (Sri G.N. Subramani, Advocate) Petitioner in Mvc Sri Devananda H.M., 219/2015 S/o H.V. Maligachary, Aged about 40 years, Residing at No.83, Ramanjaneya Layout, 3rd Main, Marathalli, Bangalore. (Sri G.N. Subramani, Advocate) V/s. 2 (Scch-8) M.V.C.217/2015 to 219/2015 Respondents in 1. Sri M. Karunakran,all the cases S/o Muthuswamy, No.101, Puthukottimedu Street, Dharapuram, Erode District, T. District: Erode, Tamil Nadu. (Rc Owner of lorry bearing Reg. No.TDQ-2589) (Exparte) 2. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Regional Office, No.9/2, Mahalakshmi Chambers, M.G. Road, Bangalore - 560 001. (Policy No.720803311302000008329 Valid from 29-03-2014 to 28-03-2015) (Sri B. Anjaneyalu, Advocate) Common Judgment
[ { "end": 84, "label": "COURT", "start": 11 }, { "end": 118, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 103 }, { "end": 357, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 337 }, { "end": 631, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 617 }, { "end": 682, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 666 }, { "end": 918, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 904 }, { "end": 967, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 953 }, { "end": 1229, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1215 }, { "end": 1423, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1410 }, { "end": 1884, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1832 }, { "end": 2246, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2233 } ]
Petitioner: Sate Of Punjab And Ors. Vs. Respondent: Chaman Lal Goyal Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 26, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 71, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 55 } ]
Petitioner: Tahsildar Singh And Another Vs. Respondent: The State Of Uttar Pradesh Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 27, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 85, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 63 } ]
-1- In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Appeal No. 272 Of 2008 In Notice Of Motion No. 1303 Of 2008 In Suit No. 855 Of 2001 Saga Department Stores Limited ) a Company duly incorporated under the ig ) Companies Act, 1956 and having its ) registered office at B-5, Jangpura, ) Main Mathura Road, New Delhi 110 014 ) and its Mumbai office at 257, S.V. Road ) Bandra (West), Mumbai 400 050 ).. Appellants Versus Falak Home Developers Pvt. Limited ) a Company duly incorporated under the ) Companies Act, 1956 and having its ) registered office at 18, Ramko Apartment ) 18th Road, Khar (West), Mumbai 400 052 ).. Respondents Mr. Janak Dwarkadas a/w Mr Rahul Narichania i/b M/s B.Amin & Co. for the Appellants. Mr. Zubair Dada i/b S. Mahomedbhai & Co. for the Respondents. Coram: Swatanter Kumar, C.J. And . Kanade, J. V.M Judgment
[ { "end": 58, "label": "COURT", "start": 24 }, { "end": 598, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 568 }, { "end": 1160, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1126 }, { "end": 1469, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1454 }, { "end": 1493, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1477 }, { "end": 1563, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1552 }, { "end": 1668, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 1653 }, { "end": 1740, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 1734 } ]
Petitioner: Advocate General, State Of Bihar Vs. Respondent: Madhya Pradesh Khair Industries Ltd. Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 44, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 100, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 64 } ]
1 WP-1767-07.sxw In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Mhi Criminal Writ Petition No. 1767 Of 2007 Shri Sharan P Khanna ) Age 55 years of Mumbai Indian Inhabitant ) havig office at 105, Dalamal Tower, ) Plot No.211, Free Press Journal Marg, ) Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021. ).. Petitioner (Orig.complainant) Versus 1. Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. ) a Company incorporated under the ) Companies Act, 1956 having its ) registered office at Jeevan Bharti ) Tower -Ii, Connaught Circus ) New Delhi 110 001 and Mumbai ) regional Business Centre Office ) at Nse Plaza Bandra Kurla Complex,) Bandra (E) Mumbai 400 051. ) 2. State of Maharahtra ) Through Public Prosecutor )..Respondents Shri P.D.Prasad Rao, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri S.P. Bharti, Advocate, for the respondent No.1. Ms. S.V.Gajare, App, for the respondent No.2. Coram: J.H.Bhatia,J. Date : 29th July, 2010. Judgment
[ { "end": 82, "label": "COURT", "start": 48 }, { "end": 384, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 369 }, { "end": 936, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 902 }, { "end": 1421, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1402 }, { "end": 1542, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1528 }, { "end": 1596, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1585 }, { "end": 1653, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1643 }, { "end": 1757, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 1747 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras Dated: 31/05/2006 Coram The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice V. Dhanapalan C.M.A.No.535 of 1998 Sahabudeen .. Claimant/Appellant -Vs- 1. V.Haridass 2. R. Selvaraj 3. The New India Assurance Co.Ltd., Main Road, Mettupalayam 641 301... Respondents Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act to set aside the judgment and decree dated 25.03.97 passed in Mcop No.5/95 on the file of the I Additional District Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore and pass the award of Rs.3,50,000/- instead of Rs.1,00 ,000/- towards the compensation to the petitioner. !For Petitioner : Mr. K.Sudarsanam for M/s. Surithi Associates ^For Respondents: Mr. Mohd.Fiary Hussain for R1 Mr.S. Jayashankar for R3 :Judgment
[ { "end": 41, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 123, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 110 }, { "end": 167, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 157 }, { "end": 244, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 234 }, { "end": 259, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 248 }, { "end": 294, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 267 }, { "end": 748, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 736 }, { "end": 840, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 822 }, { "end": 901, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 886 } ]
Petitioner: Khudiram Das Vs. Respondent: The State Of West Bengal & Ors. Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 24, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 68, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 48 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Patna Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.267 of 2010 =========================================================== 1. Ram Sevak Yadav W/O Late Shri Shivlal Yadav R/O Vill- Mahadeva, P.O. Jageshwar Asthan, P.S. Phulparas, Distt. Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary Govt. Of Bihar, Old Secretariate, Patna 2. The Secretary Deptt. Of Health, Medical Education And Family Welfare, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 3. The Additional Secretary Deptt. Of Health, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 4. The Director Health Services, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 5. The Civil Surgeon-Cum-Chief Medical Officer Madhubani 6. The Incharge Medical Officer Primary Health Centre, Ghoghardiha, Distt. Madhubani .... .... Respondent/s with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 472 of 2010 =========================================================== 1. Umesh Ram S/O Late Asharfi Ram R/O Village, Post Office And Police Station Ghoghardiha, Distt. Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Department Of Health, Government Of Bihar, Patna 2. The Director-In-Chief Health Services, Government Of Bihar, Patna 3. The Regional Deputy Director Health Service, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga 4. The Civil Surgeon - Cum - Chief Medical Officer Distt.- Madhubani 5. The Incharge Medical Officer Primary Health Centre, Ghoghardiha, Distt.- Madhubani .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :(In Cwjc No. 267 of 2010) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. L.K.Yadav Mr. Prabhu Narayan Prabhakar Mr. Binod Kumar Yadav For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Sc23) (In Cwjc No. 472 of 2010) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. L.K.Yadav Mr. Prabhu Narayan Prabhakar For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Gp4) =========================================================== Patna High Court Cwjc No.267 of 2010 dt. 01-02-2013 2 Coram: Honourable Mr. Justice Navin Sinha and Honourable Mr. Justice Samarendra Pratap Singh and Honourable Mr. Justice V. Nath Oral Judgment
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 181, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 166 }, { "end": 337, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 323 }, { "end": 500, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 413 }, { "end": 568, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 508 }, { "end": 623, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 576 }, { "end": 680, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 631 }, { "end": 765, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 688 }, { "end": 911, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 902 }, { "end": 1058, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1044 }, { "end": 1208, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1147 }, { "end": 1286, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1216 }, { "end": 1355, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1294 }, { "end": 1441, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1363 }, { "end": 1602, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1593 }, { "end": 1660, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1636 }, { "end": 1711, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1694 }, { "end": 1814, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1805 }, { "end": 1872, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1848 }, { "end": 1985, "label": "COURT", "start": 1969 }, { "end": 2064, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 2053 }, { "end": 2115, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 2092 }, { "end": 2150, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 2143 } ]
Petitioner: The Automobile Transport(Rajasthan) Ltd. Vs. Respondent: The State Of Rajasthan And OTHERS(And Connected Appeals) Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 52, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 16 }, { "end": 94, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 76 } ]
Petitioner: East India COMMERClAL Co., Ltd. Calcutta And Another Vs. Respondent: The Collector Of Customs, Calcutta Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 52, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 118, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 88 } ]
In The Court Of Shri Lokesh Kumar Sharma Additional Sessions Judge­04, New Delhi District Patiala House Courts, New Delhi Unique I D No. : 02403R0184312013 Criminal Revision Number : 57/2/14 dated 07.02.2014 Cc No. : 20/1/13 Ps : Chanakyapuri U/s : 499/500 Ipc M/s Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. Through its Director Sh. Rajeev Bhaduria Jindal Centre, 12 Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi­110066 ....Revisionist/Petitioner versus 1) The State Through Additional Public Prosecutor 2) Planman Media Pvt. Ltd. (Owner of the Sunday Indian) Iipm Tower, C­56/30, Sector­62, Noida­201301 Up 3) Mr. Arindam Chaudhuri Editor in Chief The Sunday Indian Cr No. 57/2/14 1/32 M/s Jindal Steel & Power Ltd Vs State & Ors. Iipm Tower C­56/30, Sector­62, Noida­201301 Up 4) Mr. A. Sandeep Editor The Sunday Indian Iipm Tower C­56/30, Sector­62, Noida­201301 Up 5) Mr. Ashok Bose Publisher The Sunday Indian Iipm Tower C­56/30, Sector­62, Noida­201301 Up ..... Respondents Revision received by Court: 07.02.2014 Arguments concluded : 28.10.2014 Date of order : 13.11.2014 :Order
[ { "end": 40, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 21 }, { "end": 383, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 371 }, { "end": 470, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 445 }, { "end": 698, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 689 }, { "end": 764, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 741 }, { "end": 869, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 852 }, { "end": 1031, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1007 }, { "end": 1047, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1035 }, { "end": 1121, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1111 }, { "end": 1255, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1245 } ]
Before The Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court Dated: 23/12/2011 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice V.Ramasubramanian Civil Revision Petition (Npd)(Md) No.1123 of 2006 And M.P.No.2 of 2006 1. Ayisha Beevi 2. Beevija 3. Hadijath Beevi 4. Yunusa Begam 5. Syed Ali 6. Sumaya Begam 7. Mohamed Yoosuf 8. Mohamed Ismail 9. Razira Beevi 10.Shabi Mohamed 11.Zakir Mugain 12.Ferosh Khan 13.Augustin 14.Dr.T.C.Joseph ..... Petitioners Vs. 1. Sheik Mydeen 2. A.P.Nelson 3. Chandrakala Ruben ..... Respondents ----- Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decretal order dated 18.10.2006 made in E.P.No.201 of 2000 in O.S.No.420 of 1976 passed by the Principal District Munsif, Padmanabhapuram. !For Petitioner ... Mr.K.N.Thampi ^For Respondent-1 ... Mr.Prabhu Rajadurai For Respondents 2&3 ... Mr.A.Arumugham ----- :Order
[ { "end": 45, "label": "COURT", "start": 11 }, { "end": 115, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 98 }, { "end": 204, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 192 }, { "end": 215, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 208 }, { "end": 233, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 219 }, { "end": 249, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 237 }, { "end": 261, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 253 }, { "end": 277, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 265 }, { "end": 295, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 281 }, { "end": 313, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 299 }, { "end": 329, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 317 }, { "end": 346, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 330 }, { "end": 362, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 347 }, { "end": 377, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 363 }, { "end": 389, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 378 }, { "end": 406, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 390 }, { "end": 448, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 436 }, { "end": 462, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 452 }, { "end": 483, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 466 }, { "end": 771, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 761 }, { "end": 820, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 804 }, { "end": 864, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 853 } ]
Before The Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court Dated : 09/09/2008 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice T.Sudanthiram Crl.O.P.(MD).No.3102 of 2008 Indian Overseas Bank, K.Abishekapuram Branch, Mannarpuram, Tiruchirappallai - 620 020 rep. by the Authorized Officer A.Rasheed Khan ... Petitioner Vs 1.M/s.Sree Aravindh Steels Ltd., a public limited company registered under the Companies Act, 14-a, E.V.R. Road, Puthur, Trichirappalli - 620 017. 2.Sri.Arun Shankar, Managing Director, M/s.Sree Aravindh Steels Ltd., 14-A, E.V.R. Road, Puthur, Trichirappalli - 620 017. 3.Sri.S.B.Shankar, "Pathmavilla", 3-B, Bhulabai Desai Road, Chookkikulam, Madurai - 625 002. 4.The Inspector of Police, Thuvakudi Police Station, Thuvakudi, Tiruchirappalli - 620 002. ... Respondents Prayer Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records relating to the order dated 11.12.2007 made in Crl.M.P.No.1472 of 2007 on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchirappalli and set aside the same and consequently directing the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchirappalli to pass appropriate order in accordance with Section 14 of Sarfaesi Act and take possession of the secured assets and hand over the same to the petitioner bank. !For Petitioner ... Ms.J.Maria Roselin for Mr.V.Sribalaji ^For Respondent ... Mr.P.Rajendran No.4 Government Advocate (Crl. Side) * * * * * :Order
[ { "end": 45, "label": "COURT", "start": 11 }, { "end": 112, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 99 }, { "end": 229, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 144 }, { "end": 330, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 305 }, { "end": 473, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 461 }, { "end": 604, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 593 }, { "end": 784, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 695 }, { "end": 1350, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1335 }, { "end": 1375, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1364 }, { "end": 1410, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1399 } ]
1 In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur. Cri. Appeal No.418 Of 2005. 1. Motiram Marotrao Bhongade aged about 70 years, Occupation : Cultivator, 2. Sanjay Motiram Bhongade, aged about 34 years, Occupation : Service, 3. Laxmibai Motiram Bhongade, aged about 60 years, 4. Leelabai w/o. Bablu @ Rooprao Falke, aged about 34 years, All residents of Satrapur, P.S. Kanhan, District : Nagpur. .... Appellants. // Versus // The State of Maharashtra, Through Police Station, Kanhan, District : Nagpur. ....Respondent. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Shashank V. Manohar, Advocate for Appellants. Mrs. K.S. Joshi, A.P.P. for Respondent. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram : A.P. Lavande And P.D.Kode, Jj. Date Of Reserving Judgment
[ { "end": 119, "label": "COURT", "start": 85 }, { "end": 460, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 435 }, { "end": 637, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 614 }, { "end": 798, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 773 }, { "end": 887, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 879 }, { "end": 1035, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 997 }, { "end": 1296, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1276 }, { "end": 1617, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1598 }, { "end": 1668, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1658 }, { "end": 1853, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 1841 }, { "end": 1866, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 1858 } ]
In The Court Of Ms. Manu Goel Kharb Metropolitan Magistrate, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi In Re: Case No. : 223/12 (Old Cc no. 2663/1 dated 03.10.07) U/s. 138 Negotiable Instrument Act 1. Cc No. : 223/12 2. Date of Institution : 03.10.2007 3. Name of the complainant, : The Madhav Co­operative parentage and residence Urban Thrift & Credit Society Ltd., E­17, East Uttam Nagar, Near Pali Factory, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi­59 (Through Sh. Satish Kumar Garg S/o Sh. Ghanshyam Dass Gupta, President/AR) 4. Name of accused : Sh. Alamgeer his parentage S/o Sh. Rafiq Ahmad and residence R/o B­254, Jj Colony, Hastsal, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi­59 Case No. 223/12 Madhav Co­operative Vs Alamgeer 1 of 20 5. Date when Judgment was reserved : 12.02.2014 6. Date when Judgment was pronounced : 22.02.2014 7. Offence complained of : U/s. 138 Ni Act 8. Plea of accused : Not guilty 9. Final Judgment : Convicted ­ :: Judgment
[ { "end": 35, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 20 }, { "end": 79, "label": "COURT", "start": 41 }, { "end": 579, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 527 }, { "end": 1067, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1050 }, { "end": 1318, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1310 } ]
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1015 of 2004(B) 1. Moideen S/O.Ahammedkutty, ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Sub Inspector Of Police, ... Respondent 2. State Of Kerala, Rep. By The For Petitioner :Sri.T.G.Rajendran For Respondent :Public Prosecutor The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.Sasidharan Nambiar Dated :13/08/2010 O R D E R "C.R." M.Sasidharan Nambiar, J. -------------------------- Crl.R.P.No.1015 of 2004 -------------------------- Order
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 86, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 79 }, { "end": 232, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 181 }, { "end": 269, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 254 }, { "end": 334, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 321 }, { "end": 432, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 412 }, { "end": 551, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 531 } ]
(1) In The Court Of Sh. Girish Kathpalia, Asj­05, South East District, Saket, New Delhi Sc No. 30/14 State vs 1. Subramanyam Yadav @ Rahul Madrasi, S/o Sh. S. Narsingha Rao, R/o Gali No. 8, Ajanta Park, Khoda Colony, Ghaziabad, Up. (proclaimed offender) 2. Ramesh Kumar S/o Sh. Netrapal, Gali No. 5, Prakash Nagar, Khoda Colony, Ghaziabad, Up & 3. Daya Nand S/o Shri Khem Chand, R/o village Rajokri Pahadi, New Delhi Fir No. 473/06 Ps Hazrat Nizamuddin Offence under Section 392/397/411/34 Ipc Unique Id : 2403Ro493582006 Date of Committal : 15.01.2007 First Date in this Court : 22.01.2014 Date of conclusion of arguments: 30.04.2014 Date of decision : 05.05.2014 Judgment
[ { "end": 50, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 34 }, { "end": 173, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 168 }, { "end": 199, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 182 }, { "end": 391, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 379 }, { "end": 488, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 479 }, { "end": 722, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 702 } ]
1 In The Court Of Dr. Archana Sinha Addl. District & Sessions Judge (Central­03) Tis Hazari Court / Delhi M. No. : 19/2013 in suit No. No. 1018/2008. Titech Engineers Pvt. Ltd. ..... Plaintiff/Respondent Vs. Tirumula Tirupati Devasthanams ....Defendants/Petitioners 12.05.2015 Order
[ { "end": 61, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 44 }, { "end": 173, "label": "COURT", "start": 157 }, { "end": 259, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 233 }, { "end": 371, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 341 } ]
The Honble Sri Justice U. Durga Prasad Rao M.A.C.M.A No.1656 of 2010 05-11-2014 Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd, Rep by its Regional Manager, Begumpet, Hyd..... Appellant M. Sreedevi and others.. Respondents Counsel for Appellant : Sri T. Mahender Rao Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 5: Sri Mohd. Yousuf Counsel for Respondent No.6 : Sri M. Achutha Reddy <Gist: >Head Note: ? Cases referred: 1) 2008 Acj 2855 2) 2008 Acj 1307 3) 2003(5) Ald 162 4) 2004 Acj 1 (Sc) 5) 1985 Acj 1397 (Sc) 6) 1995 Acj 358 (Ap) 7) 2009 Acj 88 (Ap) Honble Sri Justice U. Durga Prasad Rao M.A.C.M.A.No.1656 of 2010 Judgment
[ { "end": 42, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 23 }, { "end": 136, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 97 }, { "end": 208, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 197 }, { "end": 298, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 283 }, { "end": 351, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 339 }, { "end": 407, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 391 }, { "end": 671, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 652 } ]
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam WP(Crl.).No. 323 of 2009(S) 1. Shruthi P., W/O.Ravi.K., ... Petitioner Vs 1. State Of Kerala, ... Respondent 2. District Magistrate 3. Superintendent, Central Prison, For Petitioner :Sri.Bechu Kurian Thomas For Respondent :Government Pleader The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.Basant The Hon'ble Mrs. Justice M.C.Hari Rani Dated :06/10/2009 O R D E R R.Basant & M.C.Hari Rani, Jj. ------------------------------------ W.P(Crl.) No.323 of 2009 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of October, 2009 Judgment
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 85, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 75 }, { "end": 187, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 172 }, { "end": 256, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 237 }, { "end": 291, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 261 }, { "end": 350, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 331 }, { "end": 437, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 429 }, { "end": 476, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 463 }, { "end": 533, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 525 }, { "end": 549, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 536 } ]
Kambli 1 Wp1688.10 In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Writ Petition No. 1688 Of 2010 ... Tanaji Madhukar Barbade ...Petitioner v/s. State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents ... Mr.G.N.Salunke for the Petitioner. Mr.S.R.Nargolkar, Addl.GP for State. ... Coram: D.K. Deshmukh, Anoop V. Mohta & Ranjit More,Jjj Dated: 26th October, 2010 Judgment
[ { "end": 115, "label": "COURT", "start": 81 }, { "end": 402, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 379 }, { "end": 445, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 425 }, { "end": 489, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 478 }, { "end": 526, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 513 }, { "end": 577, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 564 }, { "end": 593, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 579 }, { "end": 607, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 596 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras Dated: 02/08/2006 Coram The Hon'Ble MR.A.P.Shah, Chief Justice And The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice D.Murugesan W.A. No.443 of 2006 to W.A. No.445 of 2006 and W.A. No.485 of 2006 to W.A. No.487 of 2006 And Wamp. No.1002 of 2006 and Wamp. No.1003 of 2006 R. Shanmugam ..Appellant in Wa 443 of 2006 Ammasi Kutty .. Appellant in Wa 444 of 2006 1. M. Duraisamy 2. M. Mani .. Appellants in Wa 445 of 2006 1. M. Manimekalai 2. S. Maruthachalam .. Appellants in Wa 485 of 2006 1. Perichiappa Gounder 2. Kumarasamy 3. Maruchamy Gounder 4. A. Natarajan 5. Ramasamy Gounder 6. Marathal 7. Ganesh 8. Radhamani .. Appellants in Wa 486 of 2006 1. Sellappa Gounder 2. G. Karunanidhi .. Appellants in Wa 487 of 2006 -Vs- 1. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary Housing and Urban Development Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009 2. The Tamil Nadu Housing Board represented by its Managing Director No.331, Anna Salai, Nandanam Chennai-35. 3. The Special Tahsildar Housing Scheme Unit-II Coimbatore-18. ..Respondents in all W.As. Memorandum of Grounds of Writ Appeals under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order of the learned Judge dated 23.12.2005 passed in W.P.No.37583 of 2004,20237 of 2005,24968 of 2005,37578 of 2004,37580 of 2004 and 20176 of 2005 respectively. !For Appellants : Mr.K.Chandru in all Appeals Senior counsel for Mr.R.N.Amarnath ^For 2nd Respondents : Mr.R. Vidhuthalai in all appeals Advocate General For Mr.D.Veerasekaran For respondents : Mr.J.Rajakalifullah 1 and 3 in all appeals Govt. Pleader :Judgment
[ { "end": 41, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 108, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 97 }, { "end": 171, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 160 }, { "end": 359, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 347 }, { "end": 455, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 443 }, { "end": 557, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 545 }, { "end": 569, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 562 }, { "end": 687, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 673 }, { "end": 708, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 692 }, { "end": 812, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 793 }, { "end": 827, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 817 }, { "end": 851, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 834 }, { "end": 870, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 858 }, { "end": 891, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 875 }, { "end": 907, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 899 }, { "end": 918, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 912 }, { "end": 933, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 924 }, { "end": 1054, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1038 }, { "end": 1073, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1059 }, { "end": 1190, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1170 }, { "end": 1328, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1304 }, { "end": 1450, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1433 }, { "end": 1900, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1891 }, { "end": 1989, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1977 }, { "end": 2036, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2021 }, { "end": 2129, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2115 }, { "end": 2177, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2161 } ]
1 In The Court Of Ms. Veena Rani, Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, District South East, Saket Court, New Delhi. State Versus Abid @ Guddu Fir No:196/2011 U/s 25/54/59 Arms Act P. S. Kalkaji Date of filing of the charge sheet : 06­08­2011 Date of reserving order : Not reserved. Date of pronouncement : 26­09­2014 Judgment
[ { "end": 38, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 28 }, { "end": 118, "label": "COURT", "start": 96 }, { "end": 137, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 132 }, { "end": 181, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 177 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Patna Letters Patent Appeal No.2294 of 2015 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17721 of 2015 =========================================================== Amrawati Devi, wife of Sri Dinanath Yadav, Resident of Mohallla- Manik Chand Talab, P.O. Anishabad, P.S. Gardanibagh, District- Patna. .... .... Appellant Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Town Planning Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Town Planning Department, Government of Bihar. 3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Law and Justice Department, Government of Bihar. 4. Patna Municipal Corporation through its Chief Executive Officer, Maurya Lok Building, Bailey Road, Patna. 5. Mr. Binod Kumar, son of Sri Janak Prasad Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Mohanpur, Punaichak, P.O and P.S. Shastri Nagar, District- Patna. 6. Roop Narayan, son of Shri Ram Narayan Prasad, Resident of Mohalla- Mehandiganj, P.O and P.S. Patna City, District-Patna, Bihar. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant : Mr. Vinod Kanth, Sr. Advocate. Mr. S.B.K. Manglam, Advocate. Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Lalit Kishore, P.A.A.G. Mr. U.S.S. Singh, G.P.-I Mr. R.K. Chandram, A.C. to G.P.-I For Respondent No. 6 : Mr. Jitendra Singh, Sr. Advocate. Mr. Piyush Lall, Advocate. Mr. Yash Singh, Advocate Mr. Tej Pratap Singh, Advocate. Mr. Kamal Kishore Singh, Advocate. For the Corporation : Mr. Prasoon Sinha, Advocate. =========================================================== Coram: Honourable Mr. Justice I. A. Ansari, A.C.J. and Honourable Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta C.A.V. Judgment
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 285, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 272 }, { "end": 458, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 444 }, { "end": 665, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 577 }, { "end": 758, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 676 }, { "end": 792, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 765 }, { "end": 891, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 880 }, { "end": 1028, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1016 }, { "end": 1277, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1266 }, { "end": 1314, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1300 }, { "end": 1344, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1333 }, { "end": 1399, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1386 }, { "end": 1451, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1439 }, { "end": 1502, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1489 }, { "end": 1560, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1546 }, { "end": 1594, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1583 }, { "end": 1623, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1613 }, { "end": 1654, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1638 }, { "end": 1692, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1673 }, { "end": 1745, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1732 }, { "end": 1859, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 1847 }, { "end": 1910, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 1898 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Patna Criminal Appeal (Db) No.196 of 2008 =========================================================== Raju Mistri @ Riyazuddin, son of Wafati Mian, resident of Nayee Bazar, P.S. Bhagwan Bazar, Distt- Saran at Chapra .... .... Appellant/s Versus State Of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Ms. Shashi Bala Verma, App =========================================================== Coram: Honourable Mr. Justice Mihir Kumar Jha and Honourable Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Trivedi Cav Judgment
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 171, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 160 }, { "end": 317, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 303 }, { "end": 458, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 444 }, { "end": 512, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 495 }, { "end": 623, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 608 }, { "end": 671, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 651 } ]
Hon'Ble Sri Justice K.C.Bhanu Hon'Ble Sri Justice M.S.Ramachandra Rao Criminal Appeal Nos.1012 of 2008 and batch dated:14-03-2013 Muddana Goud and others....APPELLANTS State of Ap, rep by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad....RESPONDENT <Gist: >Head Note: !Counsel for Appellants in Crl.A.No.1012 of 2008 and for respondents in Crl.A.No.475 of 2010:Smt. D.Sangeetha Reddy ^Counsel for State: Addl. Public Prosecutor ?Cases referred: 1 2007 (2) Alt Crl 1 (D.B.) (A.P.) Common Judgment
[ { "end": 29, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 20 }, { "end": 70, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 51 }, { "end": 155, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 143 }, { "end": 198, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 187 }, { "end": 403, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 386 } ]
1 High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Jabalpur. First Appeal No.961/2010 Harjas Rai Makhija -Versus- Smt. Pushparani Jain and another. Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. Trivedi. Shri R.P. Agrawal, learned senior counsel assisted by Shri Sanjay Agrawal, learned counsel for the appellant. Smt. Shobha Menon, learned senior counsel assisted by Shri C.A. Thomas, learned counsel for the respondents. Shri P.S. Chouhan, learned counsel for respondent No.2. Judgment
[ { "end": 51, "label": "COURT", "start": 11 }, { "end": 140, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 122 }, { "end": 211, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 196 }, { "end": 270, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 258 }, { "end": 305, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 293 }, { "end": 373, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 359 }, { "end": 452, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 440 }, { "end": 517, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 506 }, { "end": 597, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 585 } ]
Petitioner: Khandelwal Metal & Engineering Works And Another Etc. Vs. Respondent: Union Of India And Others Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 48, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 99, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 85 } ]
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated: 10/10/2003 Coram The Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R.Banumathi C.R.P.(P.D.) No. 1147 of 2001 K.K.Swaminathan ..Petitioner -Vs- Srinivasagam ..Respondent Civil Revision Petition under section 115 of Civil Procedure Code filed against the Order dated 16.03.2001 in I.A.No.98/2001 in O.S.No.24 73/1996 on the file of Additional District Munsif Court, Coimbatore. !For Petitioner : Mr.A.Venkatesan ^For Respondent : Ms.M.B.Dominique for Mr.P.Duraisamy :Order
[ { "end": 41, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 105, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 94 }, { "end": 153, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 138 }, { "end": 213, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 201 }, { "end": 522, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 510 }, { "end": 559, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 546 }, { "end": 578, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 567 } ]
Case No.: Tax Reference Case 1-2 of 1992 Petitioner: Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals And Fertilizers Ltd. Madras Respondent: Commissioner Of Income Tax, Madras Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 109, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 55 }, { "end": 157, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 123 } ]
Hon'Ble Sri Justice K.C.Bhanu And Hon'Ble Sri Justice Challa Kodanda Ram Criminal Appeal No.722 Of 2011 And dated:12-06-2013 Karam Sreenivasu Dora .... Appellant The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.....RESPONDENT Counsel for the appellant:Sri P.Prabhakar Reddy Counsel for the respondent: Public Prosecutor <Gist: >Head Note: ?Cases referred: 1. A.I.R.1952 Sc 343 2. (1973) 2 Scc 793 3. Air 1984 Sc 1622 4. (2009)13 Supreme Court Cases 534 5. (2012) 6 Supreme Court Cases 403 6. A.I.R.1971 Sc 1871 7. (2006) 13 Scc 516 8. A.I.R.1956 Sc 116 9. A.I.R.1980 Sc 898 10.(2002)4 Scc 679 Hon'Ble Sri Justice K.C.Bhanu And Hon'Ble Sri Justice Challa Kodanda Ram Criminal Appeal No.722 Of 2011 And Referred Trial No.7 Of 2012 Common Judgment
[ { "end": 29, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 20 }, { "end": 72, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 54 }, { "end": 174, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 153 }, { "end": 221, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 198 }, { "end": 359, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 342 }, { "end": 720, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 711 }, { "end": 763, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 745 } ]
Petitioner: Delhi Judicial Service Association Tis Hazaricourt, Delhi Et Vs. Respondent: State Of Gujarat And Ors. Etc-Etc. Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 69, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 108, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 92 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature For Rajasthan At Jaipur Bench, Jaipur S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2581/2015 K Ramnarayan-Petitioner vs. Shri Pukhraj-Respondent with S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3925/2015 Bhagwan Sahai-Petitioner Vs. Satyanarayan Maheshwari-Respondent with S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2655/2015 M/s. Ganeshdas Gyanchand Munot & Anr.-Petitioners vs. Heera Lal Peepada-Respondent with S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3926/2015 Ramesh Chand-Petitioner vs. Satyanarayan Maheshwari-Respondent with S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3968/2015 Kailash Chand-Petitioner Vs. Satyanarayan Maheshwari-Respondent with S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5072/2015 Shri Pankaj Kumar Lodha-Petitioner Vs. Amarchand & Ors.-Respondents Date of Judgment :: 18/05/2015 Hon'ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi Mr. M.M. Ranjan, Sr. Counsel assisted by Mr. Saurabh Bhandari, Mr. B.L. Agarwal, Mr. Alok Chaturvedi, Mr. M.A. Khan, for the petitioners. Mr. J.P. Gupta, Miss Shikha Parnami, Mr. Anil Mehta, for the respondents. Judgment
[ { "end": 70, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 121, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 109 }, { "end": 149, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 142 }, { "end": 218, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 205 }, { "end": 257, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 234 }, { "end": 342, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 317 }, { "end": 385, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 368 }, { "end": 453, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 441 }, { "end": 492, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 469 }, { "end": 561, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 548 }, { "end": 600, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 577 }, { "end": 679, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 661 }, { "end": 704, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 695 }, { "end": 794, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 779 }, { "end": 814, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 803 }, { "end": 860, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 844 }, { "end": 878, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 866 }, { "end": 899, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 884 }, { "end": 914, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 905 }, { "end": 951, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 941 }, { "end": 972, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 958 }, { "end": 988, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 978 } ]
1 R In The High Court Of Karnataka At Bangalore Dated the 3rd day of August 2012 :Before: Hon'Ble Mr.Justice : V.Jagannathan Writ Petition No. 14047 / 2012 (Gm-Res) Between : Sri B.V.Acharya, Senior Advocate, S/o late Ramachandra Acharya, Aged about 78 years, No.42, 5th Main Road, Jayamahal Extension, Bangalore - 560 046. ...Petitioner ( By Sri R.N.Narasimhamurthy & Sri Ashok Harnahalli, Senior Advocates, along with Sri Sreenivas Rao, Sri Vishal Badni, Sri Shahul Hameed and Sri Sandesh J.Chouta, Advocates. ) And: 1. Sri N.Venkateshaiah, S/o late Narayanappa, Aged about 94 years, No.7, Shivaganga Mutt Road, Chamarajapete, Bangalore-18. 2. The State by Lokayuktha Police, Bangalore, represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court Buildings, Bangalore. ...Respondents ( By Sri Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate, along with Sri B.Rajendra Prasad, Advocate, & Sri Shivananda Raj for Kochhar & Co., Advocates for R-1. Sri B.A.Belliappa, Advocate for R-2. ) 2 Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. praying to issue a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 21.4.2012 in P.C.R.No. 19/2012 passed by the Court of the Xxiii Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge (Special Court, Lokayuktha), Bangalore, and also to quash the complaint, which is the basis of the said case. This petition coming on for orders this day, the court made the following : Order
[ { "end": 104, "label": "COURT", "start": 68 }, { "end": 227, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 214 }, { "end": 304, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 293 }, { "end": 538, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 519 }, { "end": 571, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 545 }, { "end": 631, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 618 }, { "end": 649, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 637 }, { "end": 668, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 655 }, { "end": 693, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 677 }, { "end": 741, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 726 }, { "end": 888, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 883 }, { "end": 1107, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1095 }, { "end": 1166, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1149 }, { "end": 1211, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1197 }, { "end": 1304, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1291 } ]
In The Court Of Sh. Reetesh Singh, Asj-02/Ftc New Delhi District Patiala House Courts, Delhi Crl. Appeal No. 16/2014 I.D. No 02403R0071782014 Masood Paracha S/o Sh. Siraj Paracha R/o 2148, Kucha Dakhani Rai, Pataudi House, Daryaganj, New Delhi. ......Appellant Versus State (Nct of Delhi) ...... Respondent Date of institution of the case : 06.05.2014 Date of reservation of order : 12.09.2014 Date of announcement of Judgment : 30.09.2014 Judgment
[ { "end": 33, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 20 }, { "end": 97, "label": "COURT", "start": 35 }, { "end": 165, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 151 }, { "end": 360, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 340 } ]
In The Court Of Shri Arun Kumar, Metropolitan Magistrate:Dwarka Courts:New Delhi Cc No: 308/13 Unique Case Id No: 02405Ro202512013 Sunni Kadian S/o Late Shri Kharak Singh R/o Rz-55, B Block, Old Roshan Pura Extn., Najafgarh New Delhi-110043 ...........Complainant Versus Ashok Kumar S/o Late Shri Khajan Singh, R/o 3/D, New Roshan Pura Extn., Ration Office Wali Gali, Najafgarh. New Delhi-110043 ...............Accused Offence Complained of or proved : Under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Plea of the Accused : Pleaded not guilty Date of filing : 25.06.2013 Date of Institution : 26.06.2013 Date of reserving judgment/order : 04.01.2014 Final Order/Judgment : Acquitted Date of pronouncement : 10.01.2014 Judgment
[ { "end": 31, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 21 }, { "end": 88, "label": "COURT", "start": 33 }, { "end": 154, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 142 }, { "end": 354, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 343 } ]
1 Sa No.908 of 2012 High Court Of Madhya Pradesh ; Jabalpur S.A.No. 908 of 2012 Madhu Janiyani Vs. State of M.P For the Appellant : Shri Naman Nagrath, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Himanshu Mishra Advocate. For the Respondent : Smt Sharda Dubey, Pl. Order
[ { "end": 128, "label": "COURT", "start": 89 }, { "end": 223, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 209 }, { "end": 309, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 297 }, { "end": 354, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 341 }, { "end": 428, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 413 }, { "end": 479, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 467 } ]
1 ® In The High Court Of Karnataka At Bangalore Dated This The 30th Day Of July 2012 Before The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice Jawad Rahim Crl. R.P. No.1262/2008 Between: 1. Smt J.Umadevi, W/O N.Rathnakar Babu, Aged About 31 Years, Residing At No.758, 8Th Cross, 5Th Main, R.T.Nagar, Bangalore 2. Smt.J.Usha, W/O Ravishankar Raju, Aged About 29 Years, Residing At No.107, "Priyadarshini Apartment", 1St Floor, 1St Stage, Indiranagar, Bangalore ... Petitioners (By Sri M.S.Rajendraprasad, Adv.,) And: State Of Karnataka By Indiranagar Police, Bangalore ... Respondent (By Sri Raja Subramanya Bhat, Hcgp.,) 2 This Crl.Rp Filed Under Section 401 Cr.P.C Praying To Set Aside The Order Dated 13.08.2008 Passed By The X Addl. Cmm., Mayo Hall, Bangalore In C.C.No.22101/2007, So Far As The Petitioners Are Concerned And Consequently Discharge The Petitioners. This Revision Petition Coming On For Dictating Orders This Day, The Court Made The Following: Order
[ { "end": 99, "label": "COURT", "start": 63 }, { "end": 225, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 214 }, { "end": 300, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 291 }, { "end": 478, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 472 }, { "end": 769, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 751 }, { "end": 810, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 792 }, { "end": 940, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 920 } ]
They had admittedly left India after the first day of March, 1947, for Pakistan and it appears from the counter-affidavits that they had left on account of the setting up of the dominions of India and Pakistan.
[ { "end": 30, "label": "GPE", "start": 25 }, { "end": 65, "label": "DATE", "start": 54 }, { "end": 79, "label": "GPE", "start": 71 }, { "end": 196, "label": "GPE", "start": 191 }, { "end": 209, "label": "GPE", "start": 201 } ]
Non-applicant produced witnesses NAW 1 M.B. Mandarvalia and other witnesses NAW 2 Chhotu Lal, owner of the vehicle, NAW 3 Subhash Singh Dabi and NAW 4 Riyaj Anwar and NAW 5 Sanjay Kumar.
[ { "end": 55, "label": "WITNESS", "start": 39 }, { "end": 92, "label": "WITNESS", "start": 82 }, { "end": 140, "label": "WITNESS", "start": 122 }, { "end": 162, "label": "WITNESS", "start": 151 }, { "end": 185, "label": "WITNESS", "start": 173 } ]
No doubt, civil and criminal jurisdiction is conferred on the Gram Katchahry, but the Gram Katchahry can sentence an accused to (i) simple imprisonment for a term not exceeding three months; (ii) fine not exceeding Rs. 1000/-, and in default of payment of fine, simple imprisonment not exceeding 15 days.
[]
The company was incorporated on the 13th of November, 1980.
[ { "end": 58, "label": "DATE", "start": 36 } ]
In 1994 MPU681 (M. P. Motor Yan Karadhan Adhiniyam) Naveen Raghunath Karnik v. State of M. P., the Division Bench of this Court held that Section 20 of the Adhiniyam contains an efficacious and alternative remedy on unsuccess Under Section 16(4) and aggrieved person has to pursue that course.
[ { "end": 93, "label": "PRECEDENT", "start": 3 }, { "end": 148, "label": "PROVISION", "start": 138 }, { "end": 245, "label": "PROVISION", "start": 232 } ]