text
stringlengths
14
24k
entities
listlengths
0
68
Petitioner: The Corporation Of Calcutta Vs. Respondent: Sm. Padma Debi And Others Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 39, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 16 }, { "end": 73, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 63 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras Dated : 07.03.2011 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice D.Murugesan And The Honourable Mr.Justice K.K.Sasidharan C.M.A.No.3700 of 2010 M/s Meenakshisundaram Textiles 1st Floor, Sona Towers 72, Millers Road, Bangalore-52 rep by its Managing Director .. Appellant -vs- M/s Valliammal Textiles Ltd., No.50/1, Aandipalayam, Mangalam Road Tiruppur .. Respondent Memorandum of Grounds of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal under Order Xliii Rule 1(d) of Civil Procedure Code against the order and decretal order dated 26.8.2010 made in I.A.No.1776 of 2009 in O.S.No.16 of 2005 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge cum Fast Track Court No.5, Tiruppur. For Appellant :: Mr.V.Raghavachari for Mr.AR.M.Arunachalam For Respondent :: Mr.S.K.Raghunathan Judgment
[ { "end": 41, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 107, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 96 }, { "end": 152, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 138 }, { "end": 207, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 181 }, { "end": 342, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 318 }, { "end": 751, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 737 }, { "end": 782, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 766 }, { "end": 823, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 808 } ]
Petitioner: M/S. J. K. Cotton Spinning & Weaving Nulls Co. Ltd. Vs. Respondent: Sales Tax Officer, Kanpur And Another Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 64, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 18 }, { "end": 109, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 84 } ]
In The Court Of Ajay Goel, Additional District Judge-12 Central District:Delhi (Old Case) Pc-39/13/05 In the Matter of: 1. Rajesh Nagpal s/o Sh. Om Prakash Nagpal, r/o A-4, Inderprastha Society, Sector-14, Rohini, Delhi. 2. Smt. Neenu Nagpal w/o Sh. Rajesh Nagpal r/o A-4, Inderprastha Society, Sector-14, Rohini, Delhi. .................. Petitioner Versus 1. The State 2. Smt. Brij Bala Kapoor w/o Sh. Vijay Kapoor r/o Jasmal Building, Lawrence Road, Amritsar, Punjab. 3. Sh. Nand Lal Nagpal s/o Sh. Hari Ram Nagpal r/o 205, Shastri Nagar, Amritsar, Punjab. 4. Sh. Tilak Raj Kathuria s/o late Sh. D.N. Kathuria r/o 130/53, P.G.H. Shah Road, Jadavpur, Kolkata-32 5. Smt. Sheela Kathuria w/o Sh. Tilak Raj Kathuria r/o 130/53, P.G.H. Shah Road, Pc-39/13/05 Page:-1/46 Jadavpur, Kolkata-32 6. Sh. Lalit Narula s/o Sh. Ram Prakash Narula r/o 110/1-B, Amherst Street Kolkata-9 7. Sh. Om Prakash Nagpal (since expired) s/o Sh. Panna Lal Nagpal r/o F-104-A, Ekta Society, Sector-13, Rohini, Delhi. through his LRs :- (i) Mrs. Shefali Malhotra d/o late Om Parkash Nagpal w/o Sh. Parveen Malhotra r/o A-61, Prashant Vihar, Sector-14, Rohini, Delhi-110085. ii) Mrs. Namrita Gulati d/o of late Om Prakash Nagpal w/o Sh. Sandeep Gulati r/o B-292, Prashant Vihar, Delhi. iii) Rajesh Nagpal s/o Sh. Om Prakash Nagpal r/o A-4, Inderprastha Apartment Sector-14, Delhi, Rohini-110085 (disowned by respondent no. 7 Om Prakash and his wife on 7.2.97) ................ Respondents Date of Institution: 28.3.05 Date of Assignment to this court: 6.7.13(At the stage of Re) Date of Arguments: 5.11.14 Date of Decision: 17.11.14 Judgment
[ { "end": 25, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 16 }, { "end": 103, "label": "COURT", "start": 27 }, { "end": 205, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 192 }, { "end": 342, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 330 }, { "end": 587, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 582 }, { "end": 617, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 601 }, { "end": 756, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 741 }, { "end": 877, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 859 }, { "end": 1008, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 993 }, { "end": 1213, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1201 }, { "end": 1336, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1319 }, { "end": 1521, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1505 }, { "end": 1722, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1708 }, { "end": 1880, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1867 } ]
Case No.: Appeal (crl.) 745 of 2000 Petitioner: State of Rajasthan Respondent: Kashi Ram Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 68, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 50 }, { "end": 91, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 82 } ]
Id No. 02403R0158332009 In The Court Of Sh. Vinay Kumar Khanna: Additional Sessions Judge - 04 & Special Judge (Ndps) South East: Saket Courts: Delhi Sessions Case No. 02/2011 Unique Id no. 02403R0158332009 Fir No. 398/2007 U/s : 308/341/506/34 Ipc Ps : Kalkaji State Versus Bimlesh Yadav w/o Sh. Mukesh Yadav r/o H. No. B-621, Transit Camp, Govind Puri , New Delhi ..........Accused no. 1 Mukesh Yadav @ Fauji s/o Sh. Prakash Yadav r/oH. No. B-621, Transit Camp, Govind Puri , New Delhi ..........Accused no. 2 Instituted on : 20th January, 2011 Argued on : 08th May,2013 Decided on : 23rd May, 2013 Judgment
[ { "end": 82, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 64 }, { "end": 200, "label": "COURT", "start": 94 }, { "end": 482, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 477 }, { "end": 505, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 492 }, { "end": 658, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 638 } ]
1 AaO415-14 Farad Continuation Sheet No. In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Appeal From Order
[ { "end": 241, "label": "COURT", "start": 207 } ]
Case No.: Appeal (civil) 6277 of 2004 Petitioner: United India Insurance Co.Ltd. Respondent: M/s.Harchand Rai Chandan Lal Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 82, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 52 }, { "end": 125, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 101 } ]
6 *In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi + MAC.APP.No.13/2007 Date of Decision: 14th July, 2009 % National Insurance Co.Ltd. ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey, Adv. versus Farzana Ors. ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Arun Srivastava and Ms. Anupama Srivastava, Advs. for R - 1 & 2. Coram :- The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice J.R. Midha 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may Yes be allowed to see the Judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes 3. Whether the judgment should be Yes reported in the Digest? Judgment
[ { "end": 42, "label": "COURT", "start": 10 }, { "end": 194, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 168 }, { "end": 267, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 250 }, { "end": 322, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 315 }, { "end": 412, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 397 }, { "end": 464, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 446 }, { "end": 556, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 546 } ]
In The Court Of Ms. Anu Malhotra District & Sessions Judge / Arct (West) : Delhi Arct­23/2013 Unique Id No. 02401C0079792013 Leela Ahuja W/o Late S.N. Ahuja, R/o 1st Floor, 13/27, East Patel Nagar, New Delhi - 110 008 ............ Appellant Versus 1. Tanjeet Singh Ghai 2. Baljeet Singh Ghai Both sons of Late Sarup Singh Ghai 3. Manveet Chopra D/o Shri Sarup Singh Ghai, All R/o 25/29, East Patel Nagar, New Delhi - 110 008. ............Respondents Date of Institution : 20.02.2013 Date of reserving the judgment : 21.08.2013 Date of pronouncement of : 01.07.2014 Judgment Judgment
[ { "end": 32, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 20 }, { "end": 87, "label": "COURT", "start": 40 }, { "end": 145, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 134 }, { "end": 324, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 306 }, { "end": 356, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 338 }, { "end": 432, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 418 } ]
Case No.: Appeal (crl.) 212-216 of 2000 Petitioner: Kusum Ingots And Alloys Ltd. Respondent: Pennar Peterson Securities Ltd. And Ors. Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 82, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 54 }, { "end": 127, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 96 } ]
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam Wp(C) No. 24258 of 2007(K) 1. J.Prabhavathiamma, D/O. Jagathamma, ... Petitioner Vs 1. The State Of Kerala, Rep. By ... Respondent 2. The Director General Of Police, 3. The Superintendent Of Police, 4. The Director, For Petitioner :Sri.Siraj Karoly For Respondent :Sri.S.Sreekumar, Sc For Cbi The Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B.Koshy The Hon'ble Mrs. Justice K.Hema Dated :20/09/2007 O R D E R
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 91, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 74 }, { "end": 201, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 186 }, { "end": 289, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 263 }, { "end": 323, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 299 }, { "end": 342, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 333 }, { "end": 393, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 381 }, { "end": 443, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 432 }, { "end": 490, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 481 }, { "end": 522, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 516 } ]
In The Court Of Shri Manoj Kumar : Additional Sessions Judge­4 (South District), New Delhi Criminal Appeal No. 01/14 (Original no. 58/13) Unique Id No.: 02406R0035022013 In the matter of: Nitin Chaudhary, S/o Sh. Ved Chaudhary, R/o G­93, Lgf, Saket, New Delhi­110017. ................Appellant Versus Amit Khaneja, S/o Sh. Ashok Khaneja, R/o A­12/4, Rana Pratap Bagh, Delhi­110007. ............Respondent Date of Institution : 08.02.2013 Date of Reserving judgment: 29.5.2014 Date of pronouncement : 31.5.2014 For Appellant : Mr. Khalil A. Ansari, Advocate. Criminal Appeal No. 01/14 Page no. 1 of 28 For Respondent : Mr. R. P. Sharma, Advocate. Judgment
[ { "end": 32, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 21 }, { "end": 96, "label": "COURT", "start": 35 }, { "end": 250, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 235 }, { "end": 463, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 451 }, { "end": 835, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 819 }, { "end": 996, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 984 } ]
Case No.: Appeal (crl.) 617 of 2000 Petitioner: Ramesh Kumar Respondent: State Of Chhattisgarh Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 62, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 50 }, { "end": 97, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 76 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras Dated :: 12-07-2010 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice V.Dhanapalan Writ Petition No.9077 of 2010 A.K.Viswanathan ... Petitioner -vs- 1.State of Tamil Nadu, rep.by the Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Chief Secretary to Government, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 3.The Vigilance Commissioner, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 4.The Director, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chennai-600 028. 5.Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chennai City Iii, Chennai-600 035. ... Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus. For petitioner : Mr.V.Selvaraj For respondents : Mr.P.S.Raman, Advocate General, assisted by Mr.N.Senthil Kumar, Additional Govt.Pleader. O R D E R
[ { "end": 41, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 111, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 99 }, { "end": 159, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 144 }, { "end": 213, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 192 }, { "end": 400, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 331 }, { "end": 469, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 408 }, { "end": 541, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 478 }, { "end": 652, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 543 }, { "end": 891, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 881 }, { "end": 924, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 915 }, { "end": 984, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 969 } ]
Case No.: Appeal (crl.) 921 of 2000 Petitioner: Bodh Raj @ Bodha And Ors. Respondent: State Of Jammu And Kashmir Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 66, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 50 }, { "end": 115, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 89 } ]
1 In The High Court Of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Dated This The 17Th Day Of January, 2014 Before The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice K.N. Phaneendra Criminal Appeal No. 2619/2008 Between: Pramod S/O. Adiveppa Kanabargi Age : 33 Years R/O. Kacheri Galli, Macche, Tq. & Dist. Belgaum. .. Appellant (By Sriyuths Santosh D. Naragund & Vishwanath V. Badiger, Advocates) And : The State Of Karnataka Through The Belgaum Rural P. S. Belgaum Now R/By Its Spp High Court Of Karnataka Circuit Bench, Dharwad. ... Respondent (By Sri V.M. Banakar, Addl. S.P.P.) This Crl.A. Is Filed Under Section 374(2) Of Cr.P.C Praying To Call For The Records In S.C.No.227/2007 On The File Of The Fast Track Court No.Iii And Addl. Sessions Judge, Belgaum And Set Aside The Judgment/Order Of Conviction 2 Dtd.22/08/2008 And Sentence Dated 23/08/2008 Made In S.C.No.227/2007 Passed By The Fast Track Court-Iii And Addl. Sessions Judge, Belgaum, For The Offences Punishable Under Sections 304B And 498A Of I.P.C. And Grant Such Other And Further Reliefs. This Criminal Appeal Coming On For Final Hearing This Day, The Court Delivered The Following: Judgment
[ { "end": 80, "label": "COURT", "start": 23 }, { "end": 210, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 195 }, { "end": 272, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 266 }, { "end": 422, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 394 }, { "end": 464, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 443 }, { "end": 507, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 489 }, { "end": 688, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 676 } ]
1 arbp767.09gp.sxw ssm In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Arbitration Petition No. 767 Of 2009 Prakash Kumar Sinha ......Petitioner. Vs. Konkan Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd. & Ors. ......Respondents. With Arbitration Petition No. 677 Of 2009 Akbar Ismail Mansoori ......Petitioner. Vs. Konkan Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd. & Ors. ......Respondents. Mr. Devendra Sharma a/w Mr. Ashwin R. Singh for the Petitioner in Arbitration Petition No. 767 and for Respondent No. 8 in Arbitration Petition No. 677 of 2009. Mr. Vikas Singh a/w Mrs. A.R. Lambay for Respondent No.1 in both the Petitions. Mr. H.R. Sharma for the Petitioner in Arbitration Petition No. 677 of 2009 and for Respondent No.8 in Arbitration Petition No. 767 of 2009. None for the others. Coram :- Anoop V. Mohta, J. Date :- 16 March 2012. Oral Judgment
[ { "end": 107, "label": "COURT", "start": 73 }, { "end": 384, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 365 }, { "end": 550, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 506 }, { "end": 832, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 811 }, { "end": 951, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 907 }, { "end": 1040, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1025 }, { "end": 1064, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1049 }, { "end": 1216, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1205 }, { "end": 1237, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1226 }, { "end": 1306, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1295 }, { "end": 1526, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 1512 } ]
In The Court Of Ms.RIYA Guha, Mm­02 ( Negotiable Instruments Act) Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi M/S Aneja Agencies B­14, (Ff), Sangam Market, Katra Neel , Chandni Chowk, Delhi Through its partner Mr. Gurpreet Singh ......Complainant Versus 1. M/S R.K. Apparels 17­A/2B, W.E.A, Ajmal Khan Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi Through its partner/proprietor Mr. Arun Singhal 1. Mr. Arun Singhal, Proprietor Authorized signatory M/S R.K. Apparels 17­A/2B, W.E.A, Ajmal Khan Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi ........Accused Judgment
[ { "end": 28, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 19 }, { "end": 134, "label": "COURT", "start": 30 }, { "end": 363, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 350 }, { "end": 512, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 500 } ]
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam WP(C).No. 22352 of 2010(T) 1. Mohandas M.K., Junior Accountant, ... Petitioner Vs 1. State Of Kerala, Represented By The ... Respondent 2. The Registrar Of Co-Operative Societies, 3. The Kottayam District Co-Operative 4. Joy Joseph, Senior Accountant, 5. The Kollam District Co-Operative 6. Tensy Scaria, Senior Accountant, For Petitioner :Sri.P.Ramakrishnan For Respondent :Smt.Aysha Youseff,Sc,Kollm District Co- The Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.Surendra Mohan Dated :16/08/2010 O R D E R K.Surendra Mohan, J ........................................... WP(C).Nos.22352 & 22888 Of 2010 ............................................ Dated This The 16Th Day Of August, 2010 Judgment
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 87, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 74 }, { "end": 195, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 180 }, { "end": 303, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 268 }, { "end": 333, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 313 }, { "end": 358, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 348 }, { "end": 405, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 387 }, { "end": 432, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 420 }, { "end": 505, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 491 }, { "end": 557, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 544 }, { "end": 621, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 605 }, { "end": 693, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 677 } ]
1 In the Court of Dig Vinay Singh : Additional Sessions Judge Spl. Judge : Ndps (Nw) : District Courts : Rohini : Delhi In the matter of: Sc No. : 52/13 (Old Sc no. 31/10) Fir No. : 364/07 Ps : Bawana U/s. : 308/34 Ipc State Versus 1) Madan Lal S/o Chhote Lal R/o F-340, Shahbad Dairy, Delhi. 2) Mangat Ram S/o Madan Lal R/o F-340, Shahbad Dairy, Delhi. 3) Mohinder Singh S/o Madan Lal R/o F-340, Shahbad Dairy, Delhi. Date of receipt : 29.03.2010 (Received in this court on : 25.112013) Date of arguments : 31.01.2014 Date of announcement : 11.02.2014 Judgment
[ { "end": 43, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 28 }, { "end": 157, "label": "COURT", "start": 46 }, { "end": 624, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 619 }, { "end": 671, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 662 }, { "end": 771, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 761 }, { "end": 874, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 860 } ]
The Honble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta And The Honble Sri Sanjay Kumar Contempt Case No.965 Of 2013 12-11-2014 T. Madan Mohan Reddy and others. ..Petitioners Sri B.R. Meena, I.A.S. Principal Secretary to Revenue Department,Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad & others.Respondents Counsel for Petitioners: Sri C.V. Mohan Reddy, Senior counsel for Sri N.V. Raghava Reddy. Counsel for the respondents: Sri P. Venugopal, Advocate General (Ap) Sri L. Ravichander, Amicus-Curiae Sri P. Vishnuvardhan Reddy (Asst. Solicitor General) <Gist: >Head Note: ? Cases referred 1. Air 2002 Sc 1432 2. Air 1976 Sc 997 3. (2002) 5 Scc 440 4. Air 2007 Sc 1563 5. (2000) 4 Scc 357 6. (2014) 1 Scc 1 The Honble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta And The Honble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar Contempt Case No.965 Of 2013 Dated: 12.11.2014 The Honble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta And The Honble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar Contempt Case No.965 Of 2013 Order
[ { "end": 54, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 33 }, { "end": 86, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 74 }, { "end": 176, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 156 }, { "end": 219, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 209 }, { "end": 387, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 371 }, { "end": 430, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 412 }, { "end": 479, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 467 }, { "end": 521, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 507 }, { "end": 563, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 541 }, { "end": 811, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 790 }, { "end": 851, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 839 }, { "end": 953, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 932 }, { "end": 993, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 981 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras Dated: 28/01/2005 Coram The Hon'Ble Mr.Markandey Katju, Chief Justice and The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice D.Murugesan W.A.No.1081 of 2004 and W.A.M.P.No.1958 of 2004 1. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, rep. by its Secretary, 793, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002. 2. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, 793, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002. ..Appellants. -Vs- Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Engineers Association, Electricity Avenue, Rep. by its General Secretary Mr.G.Balakrishnan, 793, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002. ..Respondent Prayer: Appeal against the order of the learned single Judge dated 08.10.2003, passed in W.P.No.572 of 2002, as stated therein. !For Appellants :: Mr.V.Radhakrishnan ^For Respondent :: Mr.A.E.Chelliah, Senior Counsel For Mr.P.Karunakaran :J U D G M E N T
[ { "end": 41, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 115, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 100 }, { "end": 182, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 171 }, { "end": 283, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 255 }, { "end": 455, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 366 }, { "end": 554, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 503 }, { "end": 922, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 907 }, { "end": 959, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 947 }, { "end": 1012, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 999 } ]
1 cri.applns.3618-10, 5640-2009 In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Criminal Application No. 3618 Of 2010 Union of India ...Applicant vs. Ravindran Krarapaya @ Ravi & Ors. ...Respondents With Criminal Application No. 5640 Of 2009 Union of India ...Applicant vs. Xie Jing Feng @ Richard & Anr. ...Respondents Appearance in above matters :- Mr.Mandar Goswami, Public Prosecutor and Special Counsel for the Appellant Union of India. Mr.Anil Lalla i/b. M/s.Lalla & Lalla for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 and for respondent no.1 in Cri.Appln.No. 5640/2009. Mr.Y.M. Nakhwa, App for Respondent No.3 and for Respondent No.2 in Cri.Appln.No.5640/2009. Coram : J.H. Bhatia, J. Dated : November 19, 2010 Oral Judgment
[ { "end": 91, "label": "COURT", "start": 57 }, { "end": 314, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 300 }, { "end": 399, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 373 }, { "end": 607, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 593 }, { "end": 697, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 674 }, { "end": 801, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 795 }, { "end": 915, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 905 }, { "end": 1051, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1040 }, { "end": 1185, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 1174 } ]
Petitioner: Anil Kumar Gupta, Etc. Vs. Respondent: State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors. Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 28, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 76, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 54 } ]
Petitioner: Maula Bux Vs. Respondent: Union Of India Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 24, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 55, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 41 } ]
Petitioner: Bhagirath Kanoria & Ors. Etc. Vs. Respondent: State Of M.P. & Ors. Etc. Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 29, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 85, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 61 } ]
Petitioner: Manohar Lal Chopra Vs. Respondent: Rai Bahadur Rao Raja Seth Hiralal Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 30, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 83, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 50 } ]
Petitioner: C.I.T., Punjab, Haryana, J & K, H.P. & Union Territory Ofcha Vs. Respondent: Panipat Woollen & General Mills co. Ltd.Chandigarh Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 72, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 142, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 92 } ]
Petitioner: Union Of India And Ors Vs. Respondent: Filip Tiago De Gama Of Vedem Vasco De Gama Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 26, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 96, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 54 } ]
In The Court Of Sh Sunil K. Aggarwal: Addl. District Judge (Central) 10: Delhi Tm: 05/10 Anil Grover Son of Sh. H. R. Grover Trading as Foamtex India Libaspur Road, Libaspur, Delhi ­110042. ..... Plaintiff Versus 1. Rajeev Aggarwal Son of Late Sh. K.S.Aggarwal B­2550, Narela Industrial Park, Delhi - 110040 2. Mohit Foam (India) B­2550, Narela Industrial Park, Delhi - 110040. .....Defendants Plaint presented on 19.07.2004 J U D G M E N T
[ { "end": 37, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 20 }, { "end": 109, "label": "COURT", "start": 39 }, { "end": 182, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 171 }, { "end": 372, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 357 }, { "end": 463, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 453 } ]
The Hon'Ble Sri Justice M.S.Ramachandra Rao C.M.A.Nos.856 of 2003 and Batch 24.04.2013 N.Sree Ramulu and others. B.Lakshmi Narayana (died) and others <Gist: >Head Note: Counsel for the Appellants : Sri N.Subba Rao and others. Counsel for the respondents: Sri T.Sree Ramulu and others?Cases referred: 1 Air 1976 S.C. 222 2 2007 (4) Alt 607 (D.B.) 3 2001 (1) Ald 423 4 2001 (1) Ald 435 5 2002 Acj 1392 6 2000 (1) Ald 554 7 1995 (3) Ald 1108 8 Aplj 1991 (2) 337 9 1997 Acj 1141 10 1996 Acj 1253 112004 (6) Ald 534 121995 (1) Ald 205 (2) 13 2001 (3) Ald 177 14 2008 (3) Ald 650 (Db) 15 (2008) 8 S.C.C 518 16 2006 (4) Ald 398 17 2011 1 Scc 343 18 (2010) 13 S.C.C. 777 19 (2010) 10 S.C.C. 341 20 (2010) 10 S.C.C. 347 21 (2008) 9 S.C.C. 492 22 (2007) 2 Scc 349 24 (2009) 6 Scc 280 25 (2012) 2 Scc 2670 C.M.A.Nos.856, 1210 & 2274 of 2001, 335, 550, 1685, 2380 & 3406 of 2002 & 2197 of 2003 Common Judgment
[ { "end": 43, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 24 }, { "end": 118, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 105 }, { "end": 151, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 133 }, { "end": 247, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 236 }, { "end": 307, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 294 } ]
Petitioner: Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Kerala, Ernakulam Vs. Respondent: Travancore Sugar & Chemicals Ltd. Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 57, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 110, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 77 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras Dated: 18.06.2012 Coram: The Honourable Ms. Justice R. Mala Criminal Appeal Nos.814 of 2009 and 8, 33 & 40 of 2010 Badrilal Sharma .. Appellant/A4 (in Crl.A.No.814/2009) Tofan Singh .. Appellant/A3 (in Crl.A.No.8/2010) Babulal Jain .. Appellant/A1 (in Crl.A.No.33/2010) Prem @ Kannan @ Sudeshwaran .. Appellant/A2 (in Crl.A.No.40/2010) Vs State by The Intelligence Officer Narcotics Control Bureau South Zonal Unit Chennai-90. .. Respondent/Complainant (in all cases)Criminal Appeal Nos.814 of 2009 & 33 of 2010 filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C., against the judgment of conviction and sentence, dated 18.12.2009, made in C.C.No.55 of 2005 on the file of the Additional Special Court under Ndps Act, Chennai. Criminal Appeal Nos.8 of 2010 & 40 of 2010 filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. r/w Section 36-B of Ndps Act, 1985, against the judgment of conviction and sentence, dated 18.12.2009, made in C.C.No.55 of 2005 on the file of the Additional Special Court under Ndps Act, Chennai. For Appellant/A1 : Mr. N.R.Elango, senior counsel for Mr.S.T.Raja for M/S.Ohm Sairam in Crl.A.No.33 of 2010 For Appellant/A2 : Mr.R.C.Paul Kanagaraj in Crl.A.No.40/2010 For Appellants/A3&A4 : Mr.B.Kumar, senior counsel for Mr.T.S.Sasikumar in Crl.A.Nos.814/2009 and 8/2010 For Respondent : Mr.N.P.Kumar, Spl. Public Prosecutor (in all cases) for Ncb cases. C O M M O N J U D G M E N T
[ { "end": 41, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 111, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 104 }, { "end": 186, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 171 }, { "end": 247, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 236 }, { "end": 320, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 308 }, { "end": 408, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 381 }, { "end": 475, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 470 }, { "end": 1194, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1184 }, { "end": 1243, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1235 }, { "end": 1339, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1321 }, { "end": 1449, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1442 }, { "end": 1496, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1483 }, { "end": 1626, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1617 } ]
In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi Crl.A. 1051 of 2008 B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate. versus Jagat Ram & Anr. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Aditya Sharma proxy for Mr. S. Satyanarayana, Advocate. With Crl.A. 1052 of 2008 B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate versus R.K. Gupta & Anr. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vijay Gupta, Advocate With Crl.A. 1053 of 2008 B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate versus P.P. Singh & Anr. ..... Respondents Through: None. With Crl. A. Nos.1051 to 1056 of 2008 Page 1 of 15 Crl.A. 1054 of 2008 B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, standing counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate. versus Rajiv Bhasin & Anr. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mukul Dhawan, Advocate With Crl.A. 1055 of 2008 B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate. versus Hasibuddin & Anr. ..... Respondents Through: None. With Crl.A. 1056 of 2008 B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate versus Grover Restaurant & Caterers & ......Respondents Through: None. Coram: Justice S. Muralidhar Order
[ { "end": 39, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 123, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 95 }, { "end": 200, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 185 }, { "end": 305, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 260 }, { "end": 378, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 369 }, { "end": 497, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 484 }, { "end": 572, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 556 }, { "end": 708, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 680 }, { "end": 784, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 769 }, { "end": 889, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 844 }, { "end": 962, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 952 }, { "end": 1078, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1067 }, { "end": 1213, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1185 }, { "end": 1290, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1275 }, { "end": 1395, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1350 }, { "end": 1468, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1458 }, { "end": 1775, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1747 }, { "end": 1853, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1838 }, { "end": 1926, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1913 }, { "end": 2034, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2022 }, { "end": 2157, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2145 }, { "end": 2282, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 2254 }, { "end": 2359, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2344 }, { "end": 2464, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2419 }, { "end": 2538, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2528 }, { "end": 2768, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 2740 }, { "end": 2847, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2832 }, { "end": 2952, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2907 }, { "end": 3019, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 3002 }, { "end": 3123, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 3110 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras Dated: 4.2.2011 Coram: The Honourable Mr.Justice P.Jyothimani W.P.Nos.15646 and 24824 of 2010 V.Lakshmi .. Petitioner in Wp:15646/2010 T.A.Johnson .. Petitioner in Wp:24824/2010 Vs. 1. The Government of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department Fort St.George, Chennai  9. 2. The Director General of Police Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai Chennai  4. 3. The Commissioner of Police Suburban, Chennai  16. 4. The Inspector of Police S-13, Chromepet Police Station Chennai  44. 5. The Director Central Bureau of Investigation Iii Floor, Block No.3 Cgo Complex, Lodhi Road New Delhi  3. .. Respondents in both WPs. Prayer: Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of a writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent in G.O.Ms.No.593, Home (Pol.VII) Department, dated 25.6.2010 and quash the same as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional. For Petitioner : R.Thiagarajan, Sr.Counsel in WP:15646/2010 for M/s.R.Karthikeyan For Petitioner : Mr.Sriram Panchu, Sr.Counsel in WP:24824/2010 for M/s.M.Suresh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.N.Senthil Kumar 1 to 4 in both WPs. Additional Government Pleader For 5th respondent : Mr.N.Chandrasekaran in both WPs. Special Government Pleader Order
[ { "end": 41, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 113, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 101 }, { "end": 157, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 148 }, { "end": 217, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 206 }, { "end": 302, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 278 }, { "end": 453, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 400 }, { "end": 525, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 479 }, { "end": 609, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 538 }, { "end": 736, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 619 }, { "end": 1087, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1074 }, { "end": 1181, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1168 }, { "end": 1278, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1263 }, { "end": 1377, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1361 } ]
State Vs. Sanjay In The Court Of Sh. Sandeep Gupta: Metropolitan Magistrate (North): Rohini Court: Delhi. Fir no. 177/01 Ps Narela U/s. 279/337 Ipc Sate Vs. Sanjay Date of Institution of case:- 01.04.02 Date of Judgment reserved:- 07.02.14 Date on which Judgment pronounced:- 24.03.14 Judgment
[ { "end": 5, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 0 }, { "end": 16, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 10 }, { "end": 60, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 47 }, { "end": 127, "label": "COURT", "start": 62 }, { "end": 459, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 455 }, { "end": 470, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 464 } ]
(1) In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, At Aurangabad. Criminal Revision Application No. 186 of 2011 Ramnath s/o. Yashwant Gholap, Age : 35 years, Occupation : Driver, R/o. Talegaon, Taluka & District : Beed. .. Applicant. versus The State of Maharashtra, Through Police Inspector, Police Station, Ashti, Taluka : Ashti, District : Beed. .. Respondent. ....................... Mr. S.S. Thombre, Advocate, with Mr. S.D. Bade, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. P.N. Muley, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the respondent. ........................ Coram : Abhay M. Thipsay, J. Date of reserving the judgment : 25th October 2013. Date of pronouncing the judgment : 29th November 2013. (2) Judgment
[ { "end": 103, "label": "COURT", "start": 22 }, { "end": 346, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 339 }, { "end": 690, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 670 }, { "end": 983, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 971 }, { "end": 1038, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1029 }, { "end": 1107, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1097 }, { "end": 1305, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 1289 } ]
Case No.: Appeal (crl.) 518 of 2006 Petitioner: Krishna Janardhan Bhat Respondent: Dattatraya G. Hegde Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 72, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 50 }, { "end": 105, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 86 } ]
Petitioner: Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras Vs. Respondent: Ajax Products Ltd. Through Its Liquidator Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 46, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 84, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 66 } ]
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Jabalpur Criminal Appeal No.2509/1998 Dwarka Prasad Mishra, Son of Ram Piyare Mishra, L.D.C., Lower Sihaval Canal Division Churhat District-Sidhi R/o Village Karah Ps Shapur District Rewa M.P. Appellant Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh Through - Special Police Establishment, Lok Ayukt Office, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh Respondent ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Anoop Nair with Shri Siddharth Datt, Adv. for the appellant. Shri Aditya Adhikari, Special Public Prosecutor for Spe Lokayukta for respondent. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Db : Hon. Rakesh Saksena & Hon. M.A. Siddiqui, Jj. Judgment Reserved On 21/09/2011 Judgment Delivered On 28 /09/2011 Judgment
[ { "end": 39, "label": "COURT", "start": 0 }, { "end": 136, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 116 }, { "end": 511, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 488 }, { "end": 852, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 842 }, { "end": 877, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 863 }, { "end": 1122, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 1108 }, { "end": 1143, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 1130 } ]
Before The Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court Dated: 13/08/2010 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice S.Manikumar Writ Petition (MD)No.10727 of 2006 M.P.(MD)Nos.1 to 3 of 2006 R.Sakthivel, (Sub-Inspector), Nagamalai Pudukottai Police Station, Madurai District. ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Director General of Police, (Law and Order), Chennai-600 004. 2.The Additional Director General of Police, (Law and Order), Chennai-600 004. 3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Madurai Range, Madurai. 4.The Additional Superintendent of Police (Crime), Madurai, Madurai District. ... Respondents Prayer Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent made in his proceedings in Rc.No.2395/AP2(3)/2006, dated 17.02.2006, confirming the order of the second respondent made in his proceedings Rc.No.98967/AP/2(2)/2005 dated 15.07.2005, confirming the order of the third respondent made in his order No.A2/6953/03 Pr 312/03 'F' order dated 11.01.2005 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to consider the petitioner for promotion for the next higher post from the date his juniors were promoted. !For Petitioner ... Mr.S.Karthik For Mr.S.Silambanan ^For Respondents ... Mr.K.Balasubramanian, Additional Government Pleader. :Order
[ { "end": 45, "label": "COURT", "start": 11 }, { "end": 109, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 98 }, { "end": 185, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 174 }, { "end": 355, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 289 }, { "end": 441, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 364 }, { "end": 596, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 523 }, { "end": 1306, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1297 }, { "end": 1344, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1332 }, { "end": 1397, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1380 } ]
Reportable In The Supreme Court Of India Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Civil Appeal No. 1699 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No. 26558 Of 2010) M/s Topman Exports … Appellant Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai … Respondent With Civil Appeal No. 1700 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No. 27418 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1701 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.27552 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1704 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.27583 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1705 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No. 27608 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1706 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.27994 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1707 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.28036 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1708 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.28044; of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1709 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.28131 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1710 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.28167 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1711 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.28173 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1728 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.27952 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1729 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.28365 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1730 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.29290 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1731 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.29314 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1732 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.29596 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1733 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30461 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1734 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30462 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1735 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30011 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1736 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30018 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1737 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30020 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1738 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30023 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1739 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30100 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1740 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30281 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1741 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30283 of 2010), Civil Appeal Nos. 1712 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30289 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1713 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30306 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1714 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30345 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1715 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30374 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1716 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30375 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1717 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30379 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1718 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30381 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1719 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30393 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1720 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30411 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1721 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30426 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1722 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30468 of 2010), Civil Appeal Nos. 1723-1724 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30521-30522 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1725 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30549 of 2010), Civil Appeal Nos. 1726-1727 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) Nos.29853-29854 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1742 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30215 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1743 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30378 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1744 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30380 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1745 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30388 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1746 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30390 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1747 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30543 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1748 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30546 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1749 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30572 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1750 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30574 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1754 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30657 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1755 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30569 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1756 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.32066 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1757 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.32069 of 2010), Civil Appeal Nos. 1758-1759 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) Nos.30733-30734 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1760 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30597 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1761 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30626 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1762 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30634 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1763 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30644 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1764 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30665 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1765 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30671 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1766 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30680 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1767 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30684 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1768 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30689 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1769 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30721 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1770 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30902 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1771 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.31085 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1772 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.31107 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1773 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.31131 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1774 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.31134 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1775 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.31304 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1776 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.31385 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1777 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.31450 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1778 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.31849 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1779 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.32531 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1780 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30628 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1781 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30635 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1782 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30646 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1783 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.32532 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1784 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30647 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1785 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.32533 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1786 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30653 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1787 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30673 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1788 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30674 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1789 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30675 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1790 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30677 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1791 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30686 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1792 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30708 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1793 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.32534 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1794 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.30906 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1795 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.33218 of 2010), Civil Appeal Nos. 1796-1799 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) Nos.34081-34084 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1800 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.34078 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1801 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.32228 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1802 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.32256 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1803 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.33925 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1804 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.32308 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1805 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.32339 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1806 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.32384 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1807 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.34046 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1808 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.34047 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1809 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.32946 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1810 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.33708 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1811 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.33692 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1812 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.33084 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1813 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.33157 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1814 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.33265 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1815 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.33504 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1816 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.35013 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1817 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.35016 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1818 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.35028 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1819 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.35029 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1820 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.35030 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1821 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.35031 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1822 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.35032 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1823 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.35129 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1824 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.35865 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1825 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.35866 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1826 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.35867 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1827 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.35868 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1828 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.33644 of 2010), Civil Appeal No. 1829 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.57 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1830 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.136 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1831 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.138 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1832 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.131 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1833 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.132 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1834 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.376 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1835 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.302 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1836 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.428 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1837 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.2755 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1838 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.2756 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1839 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.2757 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1840 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.2759 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1841 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No. 2388 of 2011, Civil Appeal No. 1842 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.2585 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1843 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.2588 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1844 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.2626 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1845 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.2689 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1846 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.2932 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1847 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.2953 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1848 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.2742 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1850 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.2693 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1851 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.5377 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1852 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.5379 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1853 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.5972 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1854 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.7859 of 2011), Civil Appeal Nos. 1855-1856 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) Nos.7868-7869 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1858 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.8786 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1859 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.9547 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1860 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.9548 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1861 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.9549 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1862 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.9550 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1863 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.9551 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1864 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.7795 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1865 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.9552 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1866 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.9553 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1867 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.11029 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1868 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.10958 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1869 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.13774 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1870 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.11716 of 2011), Civil Appeal Nos. 1871-1872 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) Nos.14068-14069 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1873 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.14070 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1874 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.14071 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1875 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.14072 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1876 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.14073 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1877 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.14074 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1878 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.14075 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1879 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.14076 of 2011), Civil Appeal Nos. 1880-1881 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) Nos.14077-14078 of 2011), Civil Appeal Nos. 1882-1883 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) Nos.14079-14080 of 2011), Civil Appeal Nos. 1884-1885 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) Nos.16937-16938 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1886 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.16821 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1887 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.16822 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1888 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.16823 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1889 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.16824 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1890 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.16825 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1891 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.15474 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1892 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.16968 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1893 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.16969 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1894 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.17643 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1895 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.16505 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1896 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.17645 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1897 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.17644 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1898 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.16695 of 2011) Civil Appeal No. 1899 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.22460 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1900 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.22180 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1901 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.22446 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1902 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.22449 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1903 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.22447 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1904 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.22772 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1905 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.26556 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1906 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.27677 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1907 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.28775 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1908 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.27044 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1909 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.27048 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1910 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.28776 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1911 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.28067 of 2011), Civil Appeal No. 1912 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.28607 of 2011) And Civil Appeal No. 1913 Of 2012 (Arising out of Slp (C) No.29542 of 2011) J U D G M E N T
[ { "end": 67, "label": "COURT", "start": 45 }, { "end": 262, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 248 }, { "end": 391, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 357 } ]
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam CRL.A.No. 1585 of 2005() 1. Mohanan, S/O.Karithikeyan, ... Petitioner Vs 1. State Of Kerala, ... Respondent For Petitioner :Sri.C.K.Sajeev For Respondent :Public Prosecutor The Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.Balakrishnan Nair The Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.S.Gopinathan Dated :16/12/2009 O R D E R K.Balakrishnan Nair & P.S.Gopinathan, Jj. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.Appeal No.1585 of 2005 & R.C.No. 1 of 2005. = = = = = = = = == = = = = Dated this the 16th day of December, 2009. J U D G M E N T
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 79, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 72 }, { "end": 186, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 171 }, { "end": 280, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 270 }, { "end": 377, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 358 }, { "end": 416, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 402 }, { "end": 470, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 451 }, { "end": 487, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 473 } ]
Case No.: Appeal (crl.) 486 of 2003 Petitioner: M. Prabhulal Respondent: Assistant Director, Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 62, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 50 }, { "end": 131, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 76 } ]
Petitioner: Commissioner Of Income Tax,Bihar And Orissa, Patna Vs. Respondent: S. P. Jain Date Of Judgment
[ { "end": 62, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 12 }, { "end": 92, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 82 } ]
* 1 * F.A.1081/99 & F.A. 1428/2002 25.4.2011 In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay Civil Appellate Jurisdiction First Appeal No. 1081 Of 1999 United India Insurance Co. Ltd .... Appellant V/S. 1. Smt. Vijaya Harish Bolar & Ors. ..... Respondents And First Appeal No. 1428 Of 2002 Smt. Vijaya Harish Bolar & anr. ig .... Appellants V/S. Mohammad Ismail Bhagwan & anr. ..... Respondents * * * * Mrs. Anita Agarwal, adv.for the appellant in F.A.1081/1999 & respondent in 1428 of 2002. Mr. T.J. Mendon, adv.for the respondent in F.A. 1081/1999 & for appellant in F.A. No. 1428 of 2002. * * * * Coram :- Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J. 25th April, 2011. Judgment
[ { "end": 279, "label": "COURT", "start": 245 }, { "end": 588, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 558 }, { "end": 752, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 733 }, { "end": 997, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 978 }, { "end": 1156, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1133 }, { "end": 1307, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1294 }, { "end": 1394, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1383 }, { "end": 1608, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 1590 } ]
1 In The High Court Of Karnataka At Bangalore Dated This The 12Th Day Of March 2014 Before The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice N. Ananda Criminal Appeal No.1652/2007 C/W Criminal Appeal No.1726/2007 CRL.A.No.1652/2007 Between: 1. Mapillai K H Sulaiman S/O Hydros, 45 Years, Coolie, R/At Anepare Coffee Estate Line Kutta Village. 2. M N Venu S/O Madhavan, 50 Years Poojekallu, Kutta Village 3. C Subber S/O Ahamed Kutty, 39 Years, Driver Nazim Manzil, Keelaloor Village Panchayath, Yedeyannur Village Mattanoor Taluk, Kannanoor District Kerala State 4. K P Azeez S/O Late Mohammed, 44 Years Kottarthil House Yedeyannur Village Keelaloor Village Panchayat Mattanoor Taluk, Kannanoor District Kerala State 5. E K Azeez S/O Mamuti, 37 Years 2K House, Palur Palli Mattanoor Taluk ... Appellants 2 (By Sri N Ravindranath Kamath, Advocate) And: The State Of Karnataka By Deputy Superintendent Of Police C.A.Squad, C.O.D., Bangalore. ... Respondent (By Sri B Visweswaraiah, Hcgp) This Appeal Is Filed Under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., Against The Judgment Dated 26.10.2007 In S.C.No.48/2000, On The File Of The Sessions Judge, Kodagu At Madikeri, Convicting Appellants-Accused For Offences Punishable Under Sections 489-B, 489-C And 120-B Ipc & Etc. CRL.A.No.1726/2007 Between: Nayar K Vinodh S/O Kunhiraman, 39 Years Chakkekekal, Maka Post Anjaranakandi, Kannanoor District, Kerala State. ... Appellant (By Sri N Ravindranath Kamath, Advocate) And: The State Of Karnataka By Deputy Superintendent Of Police C A Squad, C.O.D., Bangalore. ... Respondent (By Sri B Visweswaraiah, Hcgp) This Appeal Is Filed Under Section 374 (2) Cr.P.C., Against The Judgment Dated 26.10.2007 Passed By The District & Sessions Judge, Kodagu At Madikeri In S.C.No.48/2000, Convicting Appellant/Accused No.3 For Offences Punishable Under Sections 489-B, 489-C And 120-B Ipc And Etc. These Appeals Coming On For Final Hearing This Day, The Court Delivered The Following: 3 Judgment
[ { "end": 51, "label": "COURT", "start": 15 }, { "end": 170, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 161 }, { "end": 307, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 286 }, { "end": 409, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 401 }, { "end": 477, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 469 }, { "end": 653, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 644 }, { "end": 826, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 817 }, { "end": 991, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 970 }, { "end": 1032, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1014 }, { "end": 1149, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1134 }, { "end": 1474, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1460 }, { "end": 1645, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1624 }, { "end": 1685, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1667 }, { "end": 1802, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1787 } ]
In the Court of Pawan Kumar Matto: Additional District Judge ­01: East District : Karkardooma Courts : Delhi. Suit No. 771/09 Unique Case Id No.02402C0046442014 In The Matter Of : 1. Santosh Garg w/o late Shri Ram Krishan Garg r/o 124/6, West Azad Nagar, Delhi­110051. 2. Smt Sarita Gupta w/o Shri S K Gupta r/o C­68, NiralaNagar, Lucknow(UP) 3. Smt Vibha Goyal w/o Shri N K Goyal r/o H.no.403, Street no.12, Bhola Nath Nagar, Shahdara,Delhi­32 4. Smt Abha Agarwal w/o Shri Alok Agarwal Quarter no.7/2,Type­4, Hvf Estate, Avadi, Chennai .....Plaintiffs. Versus 1. Ajay Garg s/o late Shri Ram Krishan Garg r/o 124/6, Wes Azad Nagar, Delhi - 110 051. 2. S.Vijay Garg, s/o late Shri Ram Krishan Garg r/o 124/6, West Azad Nagar, Delhi­110051. .....Defendants. S.no: 771/2009 Santosh Garg and another vs Ajay Garg and another 1 of 22 Date of institution : 16.04.2009 Arguments heard on : 31.10.2014 Date of Judgment : 07.11.2014 Judgment
[ { "end": 34, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 17 }, { "end": 123, "label": "COURT", "start": 36 }, { "end": 223, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 210 }, { "end": 346, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 334 }, { "end": 449, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 438 }, { "end": 589, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 577 }, { "end": 795, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 786 }, { "end": 916, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 904 }, { "end": 1093, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1081 }, { "end": 1118, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1109 } ]
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam Crl Mc No. 1397 of 2007() 1. Haridas P.Nair, Aged 33 Years, ... Petitioner Vs 1. State Of Kerala, ... Respondent 2. Station House Officer, For Petitioner :Sri.K.Ramakumar (Sr.) For Respondent :Public Prosecutor The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.Ramkumar Dated :07/04/2008 O R D E R V. Ramkumar, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl. M.C. No. 1397 of 2007 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated the 7th day of April 2008 Order
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 87, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 73 }, { "end": 191, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 176 }, { "end": 262, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 241 }, { "end": 313, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 302 }, { "end": 407, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 397 }, { "end": 477, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 466 } ]
Crr-2597-2014 (Arvind Mishra Vs Dinesh) 09-09-2015 High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : At Jabalpur Criminal Revision No. 2597/2014 Arvind Mishra and three others Vs. Dinesh and another …........................................................................... ...................... Present:- Hon'ble Shri Justice C.V. Sirpurkar .................................................................................................. ............. Shri Rajneesh Jain, counsel for the applicant. Shri V.Chouksey, counsel for the respondent No.1. Shri K.S.Patel, Panel Lawyer for the respondent No.2/State. ................................................................................................. ............ Order
[ { "end": 41, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 28 }, { "end": 51, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 45 }, { "end": 109, "label": "COURT", "start": 67 }, { "end": 197, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 184 }, { "end": 306, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 300 }, { "end": 475, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 461 }, { "end": 607, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 594 }, { "end": 651, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 641 }, { "end": 700, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 691 } ]
1 wp.2800.2013 J5.5.doc In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Writ Petition No. 2800 Of 2015 1] Uran Education Society ] a Registered Public Charitable Trust, ] under the provisions of Bombay Public ] Trust Act, having its Registered Office at ] Palak Maidan, Bori, Uran, Dist. Raigad, ] Uran 400 702. ] 2] The Hon. General Secretary, ] Uran Education Society ig ] a Registered Public Charitable Trust, ] under the provisions of Bombay Public ] Trust Act, having its Registered Office at ] Palak Maidan, Bori, Uran, Dist. Raigad, ] Uran 400 702. ] 3] Unaided Schools Forum, a Society ] registered under the Societies ] Registration Act, 1860, which has ] its registered office at ] Hiranandani Foundation, 17, ] Saraswati Road,Santacruz (West), ] Mumbai, 400 054 and having an ] office for correspondence at ] Gujarat Research Society,Dr. ] Madhuri Shah Campus, R.K. Mission ] Road, Khar (West), Mumbai - 400 052 ] ... Petitioners Versus 1] The State of Maharashtra, ] Through the Secretary, ] for School Education and Sports ] Department, having its address ] Shraddha Talekar Pa 1/33 2 wp.2800.2013 J5.5.doc at Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032. ] ] 2] The Director of Education (Primary), ] Maharashtra State, Pune. ] ] 3] Education Officer (Primary) ] Raigad Zilla Parishad, Alibag ] ] 4] Education Officer ] Panchayat Samiti, Uran, ] District Raigad. ] ] 5] Union of India, ] Ayakar Bhavan, Opp, Churchgate Station, ] ] Mumbai - 400 032. ] ... Respondents Dr.Birendra Saraf a/w. Mr.Piyush Raheja, Mr.Vishesh Malviya, Ms.Nikita Mishra i/b M/s. Federal & Rashmikant for petitioners. Mr.Sunil Manohar, Advocate General a/w. Ms.S.S.Bhende, Agp for respondent no.1-State. Mr.Anil Singh, A.S.G. a/.w Mr.R.A. Rodrigues, Mr.Rajiv Chavan,Mr.D.A.Dube, Mr.Ajay Patil, Mr.D.P. Singh and Mr.N.R.Prajapati for respondent no.4. Coram : Anoop V. Mohta, K.R.Shriram, Jj. Date : 28Th April, 2015 Oral Judgment
[ { "end": 118, "label": "COURT", "start": 84 }, { "end": 429, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 407 }, { "end": 1343, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 900 }, { "end": 1425, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1404 }, { "end": 2158, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2138 }, { "end": 2942, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2864 }, { "end": 3191, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 3103 }, { "end": 3478, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 3345 }, { "end": 3650, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 3636 }, { "end": 4028, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4014 }, { "end": 4050, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4037 }, { "end": 4070, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4055 }, { "end": 4092, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4075 }, { "end": 4173, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4160 }, { "end": 4319, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4302 }, { "end": 4342, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4326 }, { "end": 4354, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4346 }, { "end": 4369, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4359 }, { "end": 4384, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4374 }, { "end": 4405, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4392 }, { "end": 4493, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 4479 }, { "end": 4548, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 4537 } ]
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Jabalpur Election Petition No. 02/2007 Sahab Singh Patel ............Petitioner vs. Smt. Shashi Prabha .............Respondent ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Virendra Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Mrigendra Singh with Shri A. Patel, Advocates for the respondent. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of Hearing : 29.07.2008 Date of Order : 25.09.2008 Order
[ { "end": 39, "label": "COURT", "start": 0 }, { "end": 146, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 129 }, { "end": 310, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 297 }, { "end": 505, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 491 }, { "end": 563, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 548 }, { "end": 582, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 574 } ]
1 Cr.A. No.844 /2003 High Court Of Madhya Pradesh At Jabalpur Division Bench: Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rakesh Saksena Hon'Ble Shri Justice Subhash Kakade Criminal Appeal No.844/2003 Appellant: Sukhdeo S/o Anjulal Katiya, Aged about 35 years, R/o Dodasemar Koltidhana, P.S. Nawegaon, District Chhindwara Versus Respondent: The State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Appellant : Ku. Savita Chaudhary, Learned Counsel For the Respondent/State : Shri Amit Pandey Learned Panel Lawyer --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of hearing : 25.04.2013 Date of judgment: 19.06.2013 Per: Subhash Kakade, J. (J U D G M E N T
[ { "end": 103, "label": "COURT", "start": 63 }, { "end": 156, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 142 }, { "end": 208, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 194 }, { "end": 306, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 299 }, { "end": 651, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 628 }, { "end": 823, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 807 }, { "end": 958, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 947 }, { "end": 1210, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 1196 } ]
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam Present: The Honourable The Ag.Chief Justice Mr.Ashok Bhushan The Honourable Mr.Justice T.R.Ramachandran Nair The Honourable Mr.Justice K.Surendra Mohan The Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai & The Honourable Smt. Justice P.V.Asha Friday,The 20Th Day Of February 2015/1St Phalguna, 1936 WP(C).No. 31599 of 2009 (T) ------------------------------------------ Petitioner(S) : ------------------------ K.L.Francis, Aged 56 Years, S/O.Laser, Driver (Retd), Ksrtc, Adoor And Residing At Cheriparambil House, Chayalodam.P.O, Ezhamkulam Adoor. By Adv. Sri.N.Unnikrishnan Respondent(S) : --------------------------- 1. The Kerala State Road Transport Corporation, Transport Bhavan, Fort, Thiruvananthapuram, Rep.By Its Managing Director. 2. The Assistant Transport Officer, Ksrtc, Adoor. By Adv. Sri.M.Gopikrishnan Nambiar, S.C This Writ Petition (Civil) Having Been Finally Heard On 28-01-2015, Along With W.P.(C).No.7910 Of 2012 And Connected Cases, The Court On 20-02-2015 Delivered The Following: Msd. WP(C).No. 31599 of 2009 (T) ------------------------------------------ Appendix Petitioner(S)' Exhibits ------------------------------------- Exhibit P1: Atrue Copy Of Certificate Dated 10.03.2008 Issued By A.T.O. Adoor, The 2Nd Respondent To The Petitioner. Exhibit P2: A True Copy Of The Page No. One Of Service Book. Exhibit P3: A True Copy Of The Page No. Six Of Service Book. Exhibit P4: Atrue Copy Of The Letter Dated G1-2-780/08/Adr Dated 08.07.2008 Issued By The Ato, Adoor. Exhibit P5: A True Copy Of Memorandum Of Settlement Dated 13.04.1999. Exhibit P6: A True Copy Of Representation Dated 12.08.2008 Submitted By The Petitioner. Exhibit P7: A True Copy Of Judgment Dated 18.12.2006 In W.A.No.243/06. Exhibit P8: A True Copy Of Judgment In W.P.(C).No.26795/2008 Dated 16.07.2009. Exhibit P9: A True Copy Of Personal Hearing Note Dated 10.09.2009. Exhibit P10: A True Copy Of Letter Dated 11.09.2009. Exhibit P11: A True Copy Of Order No.Pa.18/003221/08 Dated 14.10.2009. Respondent(S)' Exhibits ----------------------------------------- Nil //True Copy// P.S.To Judge. Msd. (C.R.) Ashok Bhushan, Ag.CJ, T.R.Ramachandran Nair, J, K.Surendra Mohan, J, A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai, J, & P.V.Asha, J ---------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.31599 of 2009, W.P(C).No.7910 of 2012, W.P(C).No.7032 of 2013, W.P(C).No.7816 of 2013, W.P(C).No.15379 of 2013 W.A.No.149 of 2010 & W.A.No. 150 of 2010 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th February, 2015 Judgment
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 164, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 151 }, { "end": 230, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 209 }, { "end": 294, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 278 }, { "end": 362, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 340 }, { "end": 482, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 474 }, { "end": 762, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 751 }, { "end": 964, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 950 }, { "end": 1125, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1029 }, { "end": 1242, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1188 }, { "end": 1291, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1269 }, { "end": 3067, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 3046 }, { "end": 3103, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 3087 }, { "end": 3143, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 3121 }, { "end": 3212, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 3204 } ]
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam RCRev..No. 276 of 2005() 1. Mrs.Nabeesa Abdul Khader, ... Petitioner 2. Abu Sali Abdul Khader @ Sali, 3. Nazzar, S/O.Do.Do. 4. Sajeev, S/O.Do.Do. 5. Anitha Abdul Khader, D/O.Do.Do. 6. Jeby Abdul Khader, D/O.Do.Do. 7. Jameela, D/O.Do.Do. 8. Azeena, D/O.Do.Do.Do. 9. Sabeena, D/O.Do.Do. Vs 1. Suresh Kurian, S/O.Joseph Kurian, ... Respondent 2. Aboobacker Abdul Khader, 3. Seli, D/O.Abdul Kahder, Do.Do. 4. Beakutty, Of Do.Do. For Petitioner :Sri.Rajeev V.Kurup For Respondent :Smt.Deepthy.S.Nath The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pius C.Kuriakose The Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.K.Abdul Rehim Dated :17/02/2009 O R D E R Pius.C.Kuriakose & C.K.Abdul Rehim, Jj. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.C.R.No.276 Of 2005 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17th day of February, 2009 Order
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 96, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 76 }, { "end": 167, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 139 }, { "end": 178, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 172 }, { "end": 200, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 194 }, { "end": 235, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 216 }, { "end": 268, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 251 }, { "end": 291, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 284 }, { "end": 313, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 307 }, { "end": 339, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 332 }, { "end": 399, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 386 }, { "end": 491, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 468 }, { "end": 501, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 497 }, { "end": 540, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 532 }, { "end": 604, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 590 }, { "end": 657, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 643 }, { "end": 699, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 683 }, { "end": 739, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 724 }, { "end": 796, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 780 }, { "end": 814, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 799 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras Dated: 30/10/2002 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice P. Sathasivam and The Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Gnanaprakasam Civil Misc.Appeal No. 1603 of 2001 and C.M.P.No. 21316 of 2001 The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., 139, Eswaran Koil Street, Pondy. .. Appellant/2nd Respondent. -Vs- 1. Kaliya Pillai, 2. Thangam ..Respondent 1 and 2/Petitioner 1 and 2. 3. N. Velu. ..Respondent 3/1st respondent. Appeal against fair and decretal order dated 12-12-2000 made in O.P.No. 171 of 1998 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Sub Court) Kallakurichi, as sated therein. !For appellant : Mr. M.S. Krishnan ^For Respondents 1 and 2 : Mr. R. Muralidharan :Judgment
[ { "end": 41, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 106, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 93 }, { "end": 151, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 135 }, { "end": 285, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 221 }, { "end": 351, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 338 }, { "end": 363, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 356 }, { "end": 444, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 437 }, { "end": 741, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 728 }, { "end": 796, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 781 } ]
In The Court Of Shri Satvir Singh Lamba, Mm-01 ( Negotiable Instruments Act) West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi Sh. Aman Vij Proprietor of M/s Aman Services, 7-8, Mohan Garden, Main Najafgarh Road, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi - 110059. ......Complainant Vs. Shri Anand Kumar, Proprietor of M/s Rahul Trading Company, B-3, Kushak Road no.2, Saroop Nagar, New Delhi - 110042. ........Accused Judgment
[ { "end": 39, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 21 }, { "end": 156, "label": "COURT", "start": 41 }, { "end": 170, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 162 }, { "end": 404, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 393 } ]
The Honble Sri Justice M.S.Ramachandra Rao W.P.Nos.30790 of 2014 and batch 07-11-2014 Edara Haribabu...petitioner The District Collector cum Presiding Officer, Prakasam District and others. ...respondents!Counsel for the petitioner in W.P.Nos.30790 and 30791 of 2014: Sri C.V.Mohan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel for Sri M.Karthik Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner. ^Counsel for the for respondent No.1 in W.P.No.30790 of 2014, W.P.No. 30791 of 2014 and W.P.No.30799 of 2014 : Learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj Counsel for the for respondent No.2: Sri V.V.Prabhakar Rao in all three cases; Counsel for the for respondent No.3 in W.P.No.30790 of 2014, 30791 of 2014 and for the petitioner in W.P.No.30799 of 2014 : Sri B.V.Subbaiah, learned Senior Counsel for Smt. K.Aruna, learned counsel. <Gist: >Head Note: ? Cases referred (2014) 5 S.C.C. 312 2 2002(4) Ald660 3 (2004) 3 Scc 723 4 Air 1967 Sc 295 5 (2000) 8 Scc 82 6 (2003) 6 Scc 675 7 2001(5) Alt 553 (F.B) 8 (2009) 5 Scc 616 9 2010(4) Ald 646 (Db) 10 Air 1967 Sc 1 11 2005 (1) Alt 552 (Db) 12 Air 1975 Sc 1297 13 Air 1978 Sc 949 14 Air 1968 S.C. 13 15(2008) 4 S.C.C. 451 16 (2003) 10 S.C.C. 121 17 (2005) 2 S.C.C. 673 18 2012 (1 Ald 107 (Db) 19 2014 (4) Alt 22 20 Air 2000 S.C. 388 The Hon'Ble Sri Justice M.S.Ramachandra Rao W.P.Nos.30790, 30791 and 30799 of 2014 Common Order
[ { "end": 42, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 23 }, { "end": 118, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 104 }, { "end": 306, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 291 }, { "end": 354, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 339 }, { "end": 678, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 661 }, { "end": 839, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 827 }, { "end": 880, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 873 }, { "end": 1396, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 1377 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras Dated: 24.01.2012 Coram: The HonBle Mr. Justice T.S.Sivagnanam C.R.P.(NPD)No.2308 of 2005 Central Government Employees Welfare Housing Organization, Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, 'A' Wing, 6th Floor, Janpath Bhavan Janpath, New Delhi  110 001. .. Petitioner -vs- 1.Consolidated Civil Constructions (I) Ltd., Rep. by its Executive Director, 20, Lakshmi Bhavan, 609, Anna Salai 2.Bharath Overseas Bank, Chennai Main Branch, Rep. by its Manager, Karunai Kudil, 226, Cathedral Road, Chennai  86. .. Respondents Prayer: The above Petition is filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code, against the order dated 22.06.2005, of the learned Vii Assistant Civil Court, Chennai, in O.S.No.1755 of 2004, dismissing the plea of the petitioner to reject the plaint under Order 7, Rule 11, Cpc r/w Section 151 Cpc, due to lack of jurisdiction. For Petitioner : Mr.K.S.V.Prasad For Respondents:M/s.Ajay Kumar Gnanam for R1 No Appearance for R2 O R D E R
[ { "end": 41, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 105, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 91 }, { "end": 295, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 135 }, { "end": 364, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 321 }, { "end": 468, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 445 }, { "end": 959, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 947 }, { "end": 999, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 982 } ]
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.60/2012 Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Jodhpur Vs. M/s Jain Construction Co. 1/24 In The High Court Of Judicature For Rajasthan At Jodhpur Judgment
[ { "end": 97, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 59 }, { "end": 127, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 106 }, { "end": 263, "label": "COURT", "start": 185 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras Dated: 21/03/2003 Coram The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice E.Padmanabhan Writ Petition No.15920 of 1995 Writ Petition Nos. 15922 of 1995, 15983, 15986, 10854, 10862, 10864, 10865, 10875, 10876, 10880, 11238, 11239, 11368, 11369, 11370 , 11557, 12152, 12921, 13084, 13085, 11410, 11411, 11412, 13364, 13365, 13366, 13373 to 13375, 13382, 13383, 13509, 13573, 13574, 1334, 13335, 16363 to 16366, 16459, 17371, 17372, 17408, 17409, 17410,14139, 14308 to 14310, 15915, 17480, 17504 to 17508, 16861 of 1995 & 3358 of 1996 & 1234, 4636, 1380, and 9685 of 1998 and W.M.P.Nos:25431, 25433, 25435, 25437, 7436, 7439/97 & 17252/95, 52552 , 52089/2002, 17261, 17265, 17282, 17284, 170288, 17836, 17838/1995, 18045, 18047, 18049, 18351/1995, 19366, 65866/1996, 20701, 20982 20984, 21447, 21455, 21456, 21469, 21661, 21749, 21751, 25991, 25993, 25995, 25997/1995, 11855 to 11858/1997 27495, 27497, 22505, 22766, 22768 , 22770, 25304, 25322, 25324, 25326/1995, 4729, 4730, 4731/97, 5400/96, 20602, 7093/98 and 15379/95. W.P.No:15920/95 Sri Lakshmi Saraswathi Bus Service Teachers' Colony, Erode. ..Petitioner -Vs- 1. The Government of Tamil Nadu rep. by the Secretary Home (Tansport Dept.,) Secretariat, Chennai-9 2. The Regional Transport Authority, Periyar District., Erode. 3. Jeeva Transport Corporation Ltd., rep. by its Managing Director Chennimalai Road, Erode 738 002 ..Respondents !For petitioners: Mr.S.Varadachachi :: WP.Nos:15983 to 15986, 15920 to 15922/95 Mr.M.Krishnappan :: W.P.Nos:10854, 11410, 11411 and 11412/95 Mr.S.C.Palanisamy :: W.P.Nos:10862, 10864, 10865, 10875, 10876, 10880, 13364, 13365, 13366, 13373, 13383, 17480, 13334 , 1335, 13374, 13375, 13382, 17504, 17505, 17506, 17507 and 17508/95 Mrs.S.Radhagopalan :: W.P.Nos:11238,16861 & 11557/95 Mr.R.S.Ramanujam :: W.P.Nos:11368 to 11370, 13084, 17408, 17409 and 17410/95 Mr.N.Gopalakrishnan:: W.P.Nos:12152, 17371, 17372/95 Mr.C.R.Krishnamoorthy W.P.Nos:11239/95, 6114/98, 13573, 13574 , 16459, 14308 to 14310/95 and 6086 of 1998 Mr.K.M.Venugopal :: W.P.Nos:13509/95, 15915/95 Mr.R.Neatesan :: W.P.Nos:16363 to 16366 of 1995 Mr.V.Lakshminarayan:: appearing in person (Wp3358/96) Mr.K.Hariharan :: W.P.Nos:1234, 4636/98 & 9685/95 Ms.P.Vedavalli :: W.P.1380/98 Mr.M.Palani :: for implead petitioners' ^For Respondents: :: In all the Writ Petitions Mr.N.R.Chandran, Advocate General assisted by Mr.Sanjay Ramasami Petitions filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of Certiorari as stated therein. :C O M M O N O R D E R
[ { "end": 42, "label": "COURT", "start": 8 }, { "end": 106, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 93 }, { "end": 1119, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1065 }, { "end": 1195, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1171 }, { "end": 1338, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1281 }, { "end": 1376, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1344 }, { "end": 1530, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1516 }, { "end": 1591, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1578 }, { "end": 1653, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1639 }, { "end": 1842, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1828 }, { "end": 1893, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1880 }, { "end": 1973, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1957 }, { "end": 2028, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2010 }, { "end": 2129, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 2116 }, { "end": 2173, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2163 }, { "end": 2227, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2211 }, { "end": 2276, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2265 }, { "end": 2326, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2315 }, { "end": 2353, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2345 }, { "end": 2444, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2432 }, { "end": 2493, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2478 } ]
1 In the Court of Dig Vinay Singh ASJ/Special Judge : Ndps (N-W) : Rohini Courts : Delhi In the matter of : Sc No. 57/12 State Vs. Om Prakash & anr. Fir no. 152/12 Ps Crime Branch U/s 18 of Ndps Act State Versus 1) Om Prakash S/o Sh. Chuna Ram R/o Village Jajiwal, Vishnoiyan, Distt. Jodhpur, Rajasthan 2) Pramod S/o Late Sh. Om Prakash R/o Village Buda Khera, Ps Uklana, Mandi, Distt. Hisar, Haryana. Date of receipt : 17.09.2012 Date of arguments : 26.09.2014 Date of announcement : 17.10.2014 Judgment
[ { "end": 56, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 41 }, { "end": 126, "label": "COURT", "start": 72 }, { "end": 269, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 264 }, { "end": 286, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 276 }, { "end": 519, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 514 }, { "end": 578, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 568 }, { "end": 738, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 732 } ]
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam WP(C).No. 25626 of 2009(W) 1. Panachikunnel Annamma Thomas, ... Petitioner Vs 1. State Of Kerala, ... Respondent 2. Special Tahsildar (L.A.), For Petitioner :Sri.O.Ramachandran Nambiar For Respondent : No Appearance The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan Dated :29/09/2009 O R D E R Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J ........................................... WP(C).NOs.25626 & 24875 Of 2009 ............................................ Dated This The 29Th Day Of September, 2009 Judgment
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 102, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 74 }, { "end": 191, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 176 }, { "end": 258, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 241 }, { "end": 327, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 305 }, { "end": 428, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 402 }, { "end": 501, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 474 } ]
In the Court of Sh. Vimal Kumar Yadav, Additional Sessions Judge­II, South District, Saket Court, Delhi. Session Case No. 71/2013 In the matter of : State Versus 1. Afroj Ali, S/o Sh. Sarjan Ali, R/o 5/430, Dakshinpuri, New Delhi. 2. Farhan Ali, S/o late Gaffar Ali, R/o 5/430, Dakshinpuri, New Delhi. 3. Bhagwan @ Dasi, S/o Sh. Madan Lal, R/o L­240, Dakshinpuri, New Delhi. Fir No. : 446/2012. Police Station : Ambedkar Nagar Under section. : 307/34 Ipc & 25/54/59 Arms Act. Date of assignment : 20.04.2013. Reserved for judgment on : 09.05.2014. Date of decision : 15.05.2014 State Vs. Afroz Ali etc. 1 of 29 Judgment
[ { "end": 37, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 20 }, { "end": 117, "label": "COURT", "start": 39 }, { "end": 171, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 166 }, { "end": 195, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 186 }, { "end": 268, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 258 }, { "end": 346, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 332 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras Dated: 25.03.2010 Coram: The Honourable Ms.Justice R.Mala Crl.A.Nos.1033 to 1048 of 2002 1. G.Nagarajan 2. K.Srinivasan .. Appellants in Crl.A.No.1033 of 2002 Vs. State rep. by Deputy Supdt. Of Police, Vigilance & Anti-Corruption Special Cell, Salem. .. Respondent in Crl.A.No.1033 of 2002 Criminal Appeal No.1033 of 2002 against the judgment dated 30.5.2002 in C.C.No.3 of 1996 on the file of the First Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dharmapuri at Krishnagiri. For appellants in Crl.A.No.1033 of 2002 : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu For respondent in Crl.A.No.1033 of 2002: Mr.I.Paul Noble Devakumar, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side). Judgment
[ { "end": 41, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 99, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 93 }, { "end": 145, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 134 }, { "end": 161, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 149 }, { "end": 223, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 218 }, { "end": 638, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 624 }, { "end": 711, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 689 } ]
ash 1 crapeal-611.12 In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Criminal Appeal No.611 Of 2012 Sadanand Shivaji Kadam ) Age about 86 years, ) Occupation : Agriculturist, ) R/at Flat No.12, Bharati Apartments, ) Shivajinagar, Pune 411 005. ) (at present in Yerawada Central Prison, ) Pune. ).. Appellant Vs State of Maharashtra, ) (Through Haveli Police Station. ).. Respondent - Shri V.R. Manohar, Senior Advocate with Shri M.S. Mohite, Shri S.V. Kotwal & Shri Shrikant Shiwade i/by Shri Ashish Sawant and Shri A.R. Kapadnis for the Appellant. Shri S.M. Gorwadkar for the original Complainant. Shri H.J. Dedhia, App for the State. - Coram : Abhay S. Oka & Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav, Jj Date : 4Th September, 2012 Oral Judgment
[ { "end": 150, "label": "COURT", "start": 116 }, { "end": 432, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 410 }, { "end": 985, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 965 }, { "end": 1156, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1144 }, { "end": 1195, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1184 }, { "end": 1213, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1202 }, { "end": 1237, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1221 }, { "end": 1261, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1248 }, { "end": 1284, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1271 }, { "end": 1325, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1311 }, { "end": 1372, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1361 }, { "end": 1458, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 1446 }, { "end": 1532, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 1515 } ]
* In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi + MAC.APP.No.792/2006 Date of Decision : 11th January, 2013 Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Karan Chaudhary, proxy counsel for Mr. R.N. Sharma, Adv. versus Ranjit Pandey & Ors. .... Respondents Through : Mr. Idresh Ahmed, Adv. for R-1 Coram :- Hon'Ble Mr. Justice J.R. Midha Order
[ { "end": 48, "label": "COURT", "start": 16 }, { "end": 173, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 146 }, { "end": 353, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 309 }, { "end": 404, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 391 }, { "end": 505, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 493 }, { "end": 597, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 587 } ]
In The Court Of Ii Addl. City Civil And Sessions Judge And Special Judge At Bengaluru, (Cch-17) Dated this the 1st day of October, 2015 :Present: M. Chandrashekar Reddy, B.A., Ll.B., Ii Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, and Special Judge. Sessions Case No. 1345/2011 Complainant : State by: Chandra Layout police, Bengaluru. (By Ld.Spl. Public Prosecutor) -Versus- Accused : 1. Nagesha @ Penne , S/o Muniraju, Aged about 20 years, R/o No.35/5, Thotada road, Nayandahalli, Bengaluru - 39. 2. Madhu @ Madhu (Juvenile - case is split up) 3. Raghavendra @ Piya, S/o Muniyappa, Aged about 26 years, R/o No.22, Revanna Layout, Behind Ganesha temple, Nayandahalli, Bengaluru - 39. (A-1 & A-3 in Judicial custody) 2 S.C.No. 1345/2011 (By Smt.N.Padmavathi, Adv for A-1, Shri. A. Vedamurthy, Adv for A-3) (A-2 being Juvenile case against him split up and sent to Juvenile Justice Board) 1 Date of commission of Intervening night of offence 31.07.2011 and 01.08.2011 2 Date of report of 01.08.2011 occurrence 3 Date of arrest of Accused 02.08.2011 4 Date of release of --- Accused on Bail 5 Period undergone in 04 years 1 month 29 custody days 6 Date of commencement 26.07.2012 of recording of evidence 7 Date of closing of 18.10.2014 evidence 8 Name of the Complainant Prosecutrix (P.W.1) 9 Offences Complained of Ss.376(2)(g) and 392 r/w Sec.34 of Ipc and Sec.3(1)(x)(xi)(xii) of Sc/St (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. 1 Opinion of the Judge A-1 & A-3 convicted of 0 offences u/s Ss.376(2)(g) and 392 r/w Sec.34 of Ipc and Sec.3(1)(xi)(xii) and acquitted of Sec.3(1)(x)SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 3 S.C.No. 1345/2011 Judgment
[ { "end": 119, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 225, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 203 }, { "end": 387, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 382 }, { "end": 592, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 577 }, { "end": 833, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 820 }, { "end": 933, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 915 }, { "end": 1357, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1345 }, { "end": 1418, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1405 } ]
1 ® In The High Court Of Karnataka At Bangalore Dated This The 21st Day Of May, 2013 Before The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Anand Byrareddy Criminal Petition No.4104 Of 2009 Connected With Criminal Petition No.4369 of 2009 Between: 1. M/s. Shree Ganesh Steel Rolling Mills Limited, represented by its Director, Mr. Ashok Kumar Saraf, 14-A, Ennore High Road, Thiruvottiyur, Chennai - 600 019. 2. Mr. Ashok Kumar Saraf, Son of D.D. Saraf, Aged about 46 years, Director, M/s. Shree Ganesh Steel Rolling Mills Limited, 14-A, Ennore High Road, Thiruvottiyur, Chennai - 600 019. 3. Mrs. Ruchira Saraf, Wife of Mr. Ashok Kumar Saraf, 2 Aged about 38 years, Director, M/s. Shree Ganesh Steel Rolling Mills Limited, 14-A, Ennore High Road, Thiruvottiyur, Chennai - 600 019. ...Petitioners Common (By Shri. G.L. Rawal, Senior Advocate for Shri. K. Sachindra Karanth, Advocate) And: M/s. Stcl Limited (A Government of India undertaking) Having their office at No.166/2, 13th Main Road, Vasanthanagar, Bangalore - 560 052, Represented by its Managing Director, through its Authorised Officer, Mr. Jagadeesh Kumar, Manager - Marketing (in-charge). ...Respondent Common (By Shri. Chandrashekara .K, Advocate for Shri. Kiran S Javali, Advocate) ***** In CRL.P.No.4104 of 2009 This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to set aside the order dated 20.07.2009 passed by the Xv Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore, in P.C.R.No.11982 of 2009 now numbered as C.C.No.16289 of 2009 issuing summons to the 3 petitioners and allow this petition by quashing the entire proceedings in P.C.R.No.11982/2009 now numbered as C.C.No. 16289 of 2009 on the file of Xv Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore. In CRL.P.No.4369 of 2009 This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to set aside the order dated 17.06.2009 passed by the Xv Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore, in C.C.No.13784 of 2009 originally numbered as P.C.R.No.7831/2009 and issuing summons to the petitioners These petitions having been heard and reserved on 19.04.2013 and coming on for pronouncement of orders this day, the Court delivered the following:- Order
[ { "end": 128, "label": "COURT", "start": 71 }, { "end": 255, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 240 }, { "end": 454, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 407 }, { "end": 622, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 605 }, { "end": 853, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 840 }, { "end": 1217, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1207 }, { "end": 1265, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1245 }, { "end": 1301, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1289 }, { "end": 1650, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1633 }, { "end": 1685, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1671 } ]
In The Court Of Ms. Jyoti Kler, Additional Senior Civil Judge­ Cum­Judge Small Cause Court­Cum­ Guardian Judge, South­ East District, Saket Court Complex, New Delhi Rca No: 05/13 Case Id No. 02406C0139602013 In The Matters Of : Sh. Bhagwat S/o Sh. Jaipal, R/o A­66, Near Bharat Ghar, Garhi, East of Kailash, New Delhi .....Appellant Versus Sh. Vijay Kumar S/o Sh. Rampal, R/o 24, Garhi, East of Kailash, New Delhi. .....Respondent Date of Institution: 01.06.2013 Date of Final Arguments: 22.03.2014 Date of Judgment: 09.04.2014 Decision: Partly allowed. And Rca No. 03/13 Case Id No. 02406C0108652013 In The Matters Of : Sh. Vijay Kumar S/o Sh. Rampal, R/o 24, Garhi, Rca No. 05/13 Sh. Bhagwat Vs. Vijay Kumar & Rca No. 03/13 Vijay Kumar Vs. Bhagwat 1/22 East of Kailash, New Delhi. .....Appellant Versus Sh. Bhagwat S/o Sh. Jaipal, R/o A­66, Near Bharat Ghar Garhi, East of Kailash, New Delhi .....Respondent Date of Institution: 30.04.2013 Date of Final Arguments: 22.03.2014 Date of Judgment: 09.04.2014 Decision: Dismissed. Judgment
[ { "end": 30, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 20 }, { "end": 178, "label": "COURT", "start": 32 }, { "end": 259, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 252 }, { "end": 464, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 453 }, { "end": 1106, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1095 }, { "end": 1118, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1111 }, { "end": 1302, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1295 } ]
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam WP(C).No. 9508 of 2009(G) 1. Valsala Kumari Devi.M., ... Petitioner Vs 1. State Of Kerala, Represented By Its ... Respondent 2. Director Of Higher Secondary Education, 3. Regional Deputy Director, 4. Manager, B.A.R. Higher Secondary School, 5. Principal, B.A.R. Higher Secondary For Petitioner :Sri.O.V.Radhakrishnan (Sr.) For Respondent :Smt.P.K.Priya The Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.R.Ramachandran Nair Dated :22/02/2011 O R D E R T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 9508 of 2009-G - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 22nd day of February, 2011. Judgment
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 95, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 73 }, { "end": 184, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 169 }, { "end": 291, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 253 }, { "end": 321, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 297 }, { "end": 366, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 327 }, { "end": 406, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 372 }, { "end": 462, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 445 }, { "end": 516, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 507 }, { "end": 563, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 542 }, { "end": 639, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 617 } ]
In The Court Of Shri Puneet Pahwa Metropolitan Magistrate ­ 01 (N.I. Act) Patiala House Courts : New Delhi Sh. Ramesh S/o Sh. Kishan Lal, R/o 2028­1/E, Pillanji, Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi ....................... Complainant Vs. Sh. Mahender Singh @ Mahender Sardar (Senior Clerk, Steno) Block No.3, Punjab Cell, Cgo Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. . ................................Accused Case Number. : 267/1 Date of Institution of Present Case. : 31.05.2004 Offence Complained Of. : U/s 138 Ni Act Case No. 267/1 Plea of the Accused. : Not Guilty Arguments Heard On. : 07.03.2014. Final Order. : Convicted. Date of Judgment. : 26.03.2014 - :: Judgment
[ { "end": 33, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 21 }, { "end": 137, "label": "COURT", "start": 47 }, { "end": 151, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 145 }, { "end": 394, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 362 } ]
In The Court Of Sh. Gorakh Nath Pandey Additional District Judge­02 (Ne) Karkardooma Courts, Delhi Cs No. 243/14 In The Matter Of :­ Lokesh Kumar Jain S/o Sh. R. P. Jain R/o C­8, West Jyoti Nagar, Delhi­ 110094. ....... Plaintiff Versus (1) Tulsha Devi W/o Late Sh. Rajesh Kumar Sharma (2) Gaurav Sharma ( 17 years) S/o Late Sh. Rajesh Kumar Sharma (3) Saurabh Sharma (16 years) S/o Late Sh. Rajesh Kumar Sharma (4) Kumari Bhawna Sharma (15 years) D/o Late Sh. Rajesh Kumar Sharma All minors through their natural mother/ Guardian i.e. addressee No. 1 Smt. Tulsha Devi. All R/o H. No. 1/ 2091, ( Old No. 603/5­D/3L), Gali No. 21, East Ram Nagar, Shahdara, Delhi­110032 ..... defendants Cs No. 243/14 1/15 Lokesh Kumar Jain V/s Tulsha Devi O R D E R
[ { "end": 38, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 20 }, { "end": 136, "label": "COURT", "start": 57 }, { "end": 237, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 220 }, { "end": 463, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 452 }, { "end": 539, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 526 }, { "end": 627, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 613 }, { "end": 720, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 700 } ]
In The Court Of Sh. Sunil Rana Addl. District Judge : 02 (North West) Rohini Courts: Delhi Rca No. 104/13. Unique Id No.02404C0264692013. K.L.Dhawan S/o Sh. Devi Dayal Dhawan, R/o. A­56/5 (Back Portion), Kewal Park Extn., Near Ram Lila Ground, Delhi­33. ........Appellant Versus Shuveta Abhichandani W/o Sh. Dhiraj Abichandani, R/o. 56/4, Kewal Park Extn., Near Ram Lila Ground, Delhi­33. ........Respondent Date of Filing : 17.09.2013. Date of Reserving order : 26.02.2014. Date of Judgment : 26.02.2014. Order
[ { "end": 30, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 20 }, { "end": 136, "label": "COURT", "start": 47 }, { "end": 212, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 202 }, { "end": 539, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 519 } ]
Mohan Tiwari Vs. Satinder Kumar & Ors. In The Court Of Sh. K S Mohi : Presiding Officer : Mact South District : Saket Courts : New Delhi Petition No. : 158/13 Unique case Id : 02406C0125192013 1. Mohan Tiwari ...... Father S/o Sh. Babu Nandan 2. Indrawati ...... Mother W/o Sh. Mohan Tiwari Both R/o H. No. 26, Vill. & P.S. Kotava Distt. Padrauna, Kushi Nagar, U.P. ..... Petitioners Versus 1. Satinder Kumar S/o Sh. Mool Chand R/o 62­K, Humayun Pur village Ps : Safdarjung Enclave New Delhi - 110 029 ..... Driver 2. Anil Kumar S/o Sh. Mukhtiyar Singh R/o H. No. 502, Vill. Sihi, Sector­8, Ballabgarh, Faridabad Haryana ..... Owner 3. Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. Birla Tower, 5th Floor, 25, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi ..... Insurer ..... Respondents Petition No. : 158/13 Page No. 1 of 17 Mohan Tiwari Vs. Satinder Kumar & Ors. Date of Institution : 08.05.2013 Date of reserving of judgment/order : 28.07.2014 Date of pronouncement : 28.08.2014 J U D G M E N T
[ { "end": 12, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 0 }, { "end": 31, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 17 }, { "end": 80, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 72 }, { "end": 253, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 241 }, { "end": 337, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 328 }, { "end": 657, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 643 }, { "end": 831, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 821 }, { "end": 1042, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1002 }, { "end": 1442, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1430 }, { "end": 1461, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1447 } ]
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 290 of 2002() 1. N.I.Shaju, S/O.N.I.Ippan, ... Petitioner Vs 1. T.K.Paulose, Thondanala House, ... Respondent 2. State, Represented By The For Petitioner :Sri.C.P.Udayabhanu For Respondent :Sri.P.B.Asokan The Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.S.Satheesachandran Dated :17/07/2009 O R D E R
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 86, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 77 }, { "end": 186, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 175 }, { "end": 259, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 254 }, { "end": 332, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 318 }, { "end": 381, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 371 }, { "end": 427, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 407 } ]
1 Reserved Judgment In The High Court Of Uttarakhand At Nainital Special Appeal No. 14 of 2015 Rajesh Goyal & others. ............ Appellants Versus State of Uttarakhand & others. ............. Respondents Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate, along with Mr. H.M. Bhatia, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Vinay Garg, Advocate, with Mr. Rahul Consul, Advocate for the Mdda. Mr. Pradeep Joshi, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Judgment
[ { "end": 121, "label": "COURT", "start": 84 }, { "end": 188, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 176 }, { "end": 315, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 295 }, { "end": 384, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 372 }, { "end": 422, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 411 }, { "end": 467, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 457 }, { "end": 500, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 488 }, { "end": 542, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 529 } ]
Sh. G. N. Pandey, Additional District Judge­2( Ne), Kkd Courts, Delhi In The Court Of Sh. G. N. Pandey Additional District Judge­02 (Ne) Karkardooma Courts, Delhi Rca No. 36/14 Case I.D. Number : 02402C0238582010 In The Matter Of :­ Amar Singh S/o Sh. Rattan Singh R/o Village & P.O. Gokalpur, Delhi­110094. .......Appellant Versus (1) Hans Raj S/o Sh. Ari Singh Proprietor of Plastic Industry Village & P.O. Gokalpur, Shahdara, Delhi­110094. (2) Dharam Pal S/o Sh. Bishamber Proprietor of Plastic Dana Factory (through LRs) (a) Rajesh Kumar (Son) S/o Late Dharampal R/o Village & P. O. Gokalpuri, Shahdara, Delhi. (b) Nandoi Kumar ( Son) S/o Late Dharampal Rca No. 36/14 1/17 Amar Singh V/s Hansraj & Anr. Sh. G. N. Pandey, Additional District Judge­2( Ne), Kkd Courts, Delhi R/o Village & P. O. Gokalpuri, Shahdara, Delhi. (c) Smt. Brahamwati W/o Late Dharampal R/o Village & P. O. Gokalpuri, Shahdara, Delhi. (3) Chander Pal S/o Sh. Ari Singh Proprietor of Polythene Bags Factory Village & P. O. Gokalpur, Shahdara, Delhi­110094. ......Respondents Date of Institution of Appeal:23.08.2010 Received in this Court :10.02.2014 Arguments heard on : 20.09.2014 Date of Judgment/Order : 20.09.2014 Decision : Dismissed with cost. J U D G M E N T
[ { "end": 16, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 4 }, { "end": 70, "label": "COURT", "start": 19 }, { "end": 134, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 122 }, { "end": 512, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 502 }, { "end": 785, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 777 }, { "end": 984, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 974 }, { "end": 1133, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1121 }, { "end": 1290, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1278 }, { "end": 1450, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1440 }, { "end": 1462, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1455 }, { "end": 1505, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 1493 }, { "end": 1677, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1667 }, { "end": 1828, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1817 } ]
In the Court of Pawan Kumar Matto Additional District Judge­01 (East) Karkardooma Courts, Delhi Mca No.17/2013 Unique Case Id No.02402C0305962013 In the matter of :­ Sh. Jagat Singh Talwar S/o late Sh. Sujan Singh R/o House No.J­1/14, Upper Ground Floor, Krishna Nagar, Delhi­110051 ..........Appellant/Plaintiff Versus 1. Sh. Nirmal Singh Talwar S/o late Sujan Singh Talwar 2. Smt. Deep Kaur W/o Sh. Nirmal Singh Talwar Both R/o House No.C­8, Hazara Park, Chander Nagar, Delhi­110051. 3. Sh. Rajesh Jain Sole Proprietor / Partner of M/s. J.R.N. Textiles, One Shop in Property No.IX/6629, Nehru Gali, Gandhi Nagar, Delhi­110031. .........Respondents/Defendants Date of institution : 19.09.2013 Arguments heard on : 03.06.2014 Order announced on : 09.06.2014 Mca No.17/2013 Page No.1 of 16 09.06.2014 O R D E R
[ { "end": 33, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 16 }, { "end": 127, "label": "COURT", "start": 48 }, { "end": 224, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 206 }, { "end": 427, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 408 }, { "end": 483, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 474 }, { "end": 617, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 606 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras Dated : 23.8.2006 C O R A M : The Honourable Mr.A.P.Shah, The Chief Justice And The Honourable Mr.Justice K.Chandru W.P.Nos.18898 of 2000, 19998 of 2001, 24316 of 2002 and 17646 of 2006 & W.M.P.Nos.27383 and 27384 of 2000, 29477 and 29478 of 2001, 33424 and 33425 of 2002 and MP.Nos.1, 2 and 3 of 2006 W.P.NOs.18898 of 2000, 19998 of 2001 and 24316 of 2002: Consumer Action Group rep.by its Trustee Tara Murali, No.7, 4th Street, Venkateswara Nagar, Adyar, Chennai-600 020. ... Appellant -vs- 1. The State of Tamil Nadu rep.by its Secretary to Government, Law Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 2. The State of Tamil Nadu rep.by its Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 3. The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, rep.by its Member-Secretary, Thalamuthu Natarajan Malegai, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. ...Respondents Wp.17646 Of 2006: K.R.Ramaswamy @ Traffic Ramaswamy ... Petitioner -vs- 1. State rep.by the Secretary, Municipal Administration, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2. The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. 3. The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Ripon Building, Chennai-600 003. 4. The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai City, Egmore, Chennai-8. 5. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, 800, Anna Salai, Chennai-2. 6. The Chairman, Chennai Metropolitan Water supply and sewerage Board, Pumping Station Road, Chennai-2. ... Respondents (Respondents 5 and 6 impleaded suo motu as per the order of this court, dated 21.7.2006) Prayer in Wp.18898 of 2000: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of declaration declaring (a) Section 113-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act,1971 as amended by the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Amendment Ordinance, 2000 (Ordinance 7 of 2000) ultra vires Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India; and (b) The provisions of the Application, Assessment and Collection of Regularisation Fee (Chennai Metropolitan Area) Rules, 1999 as ultra vires Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India; and pass such further orders. Prayer in Wp.19998 of 2001: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for the issuance of a writ of declaration declaring (a) Section 113-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 as amended by the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Amendment Ordinance, 2001 (Ordinance 5 of 2001) ultra vires Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and (b) The provisions of the Application, Assessment and Collection of Regularisation Fee (Chennai Metropolitan Area) Rules, 1999 as ultra vires Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India; and pass such further orders. Prayer in Wp.24316 of 2002: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for the issuance of a writ of declaration declaring (a) Section 113-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 as amended by the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Amendment Act, 2002 (Act 7 of 2002) ultra vires Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and (b) The provisions of the Application, Assessment and Collection of Regularisation Fee (Chennai Metropolitan Area) Rules, 1999 as ultra vires Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India; and pass such further orders. Prayer In Wp.17646 Of 2006 : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondents 2, 3 and 4 to enforce the provisions on the Tamil Nadu Multi-storeyed Building Act and Rules, 1973 and City Municipal Act, 1919 in respect of building in the city of Chennai to ensure the public safety and effective free flow of Traffic and pass such further orders. For petitioner in Wp. Nos.18898 of 2000, 9998 of 2001 and 24316 of 2002 :: Mr. Sriram Panchu, Sc for Mr.T.Mohan For petitioner in Wp. No.17646 of 2006 :: Mr.Elephant G.Rajendran For respondents :: Mr.R.Viduthalai, Advocate General assisted by Mr.Raja Kalifulla, Gp for State assisted by Mr.J.Ravindran, for Cmda, Tneb and Cmwssb assisted by Mr.L.N.Praghasham, for Chennai Corporation. ********* Common Order
[ { "end": 41, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 101, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 93 }, { "end": 160, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 151 }, { "end": 427, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 406 }, { "end": 578, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 559 }, { "end": 699, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 680 }, { "end": 969, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 831 }, { "end": 1101, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1096 }, { "end": 1357, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1235 }, { "end": 1456, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1369 }, { "end": 1543, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1468 }, { "end": 1636, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1556 }, { "end": 1766, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1649 }, { "end": 4243, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4230 }, { "end": 4339, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4319 }, { "end": 4377, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4365 }, { "end": 4435, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4421 }, { "end": 4500, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4489 }, { "end": 4573, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4559 } ]
Sbcwp No.10833/2010 - M/s R.P.Bricks Industries vs. State & Ors. & other connected matters Judgment dt:26/4/2013 1/106 In The High Court Of Judicature For Rajasthan At Jodhpur Order
[ { "end": 47, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 26 }, { "end": 57, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 52 }, { "end": 375, "label": "COURT", "start": 295 } ]
1 The High Court Of Meghalaya Wp(C) No. 276 of 2013 1. Shri Banshanbor Thangkhiew, S/o (L) Din Singh Dkhar, R/o Mawlai Nongpdeng, Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. ... Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Meghalaya Represented by the Secretary (Revenue Department), Shillong. 2. The Deputy Commissioner/Collector, Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya. 3. The Extra Assistant Commissioner (Incharge - Revenue), Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya. 4. The Union of India, Defence Ministry, Represented by Defence Estate Officer, Silpukhuri, Guwahati, Assam. ....Respondents Before The Hon'Ble Mr Justice T Nandakumar Singh For the petitioner : Mr. E.Nongbri, Adv. For the respondents : Ms. N.G.Shylla, Ga. Mr. R.Deb Nath,CGC. Date of hearing : 04-06-2015 Date of Judgment : 03-07-2015 Judgment
[ { "end": 38, "label": "COURT", "start": 15 }, { "end": 113, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 92 }, { "end": 364, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 346 }, { "end": 525, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 455 }, { "end": 634, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 538 }, { "end": 661, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 647 }, { "end": 883, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 865 }, { "end": 918, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 909 }, { "end": 964, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 954 }, { "end": 987, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 977 } ]
In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi Cs(Os) 1417/2009 & Ia 9891/2009 Reserved on : 12th August 2009 Decision on : 18th August 2009 M/S Oval Investment Pvt Ltd & Ors ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. C.A. Sundram, Senior Advocate and Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manish Sharma & Ms. Rohini Musa, Advocates versus M/S Indiabulls Financial Services Ltd & Ors ..... Defendants Through Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Senior Advocate and Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Mr. Mahesh Agarwal and Mr. Akshay Ringe, Advocate for Defendant No.1. Ms. Neelima Tripathi, Advocate for Defendant Nos. 2 to 19. Coram: Hon'Ble Dr. Justice S. Muralidhar 1.Whether reporters of the local news papers be allowed to see the judgment? No 2.To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes Judgment
[ { "end": 39, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 250, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 227 }, { "end": 323, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 311 }, { "end": 376, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 363 }, { "end": 430, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 417 }, { "end": 448, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 437 }, { "end": 530, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 497 }, { "end": 626, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 613 }, { "end": 677, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 666 }, { "end": 732, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 718 }, { "end": 752, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 738 }, { "end": 787, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 775 }, { "end": 852, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 836 }, { "end": 960, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 947 } ]
1 In The Court Of Ms. Illa Rawat : Addl. Sessions Judge (North­West)­01, Rohini : Delhi (Sessions Case No. 63/12) Unique Id case No. 02404R0119022012 State Vs. Sandeep @ Amit Fir No. : 77/2012 U/s : 323/365/376/506 Ipc P.S. : Sultanpuri State Vs. Sandeep @ Amit s/o Sh. Devtan Din r/o C­6/30, Sultanpuri Delhi. Date of institution of case­ 02.05.2012 Date on which, judgment has been reserved­ 17.02.2014 Date of pronouncement of judgment - 20.02.2014 Judgment
[ { "end": 44, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 34 }, { "end": 132, "label": "COURT", "start": 48 }, { "end": 207, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 202 }, { "end": 237, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 223 }, { "end": 354, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 349 }, { "end": 403, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 389 } ]
In The Court Of Xlv Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru City (Cch-46) Present: Sri Suresh .K., B.Sc., Ll.B., Xlv Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge. Dated This The 19Th Day Of October 2015 S.C. No. 86/2009 Between: The State Of Karnataka By Basaveshwara Nagara Police Bengaluru. .. Complainant And 1. Srinivasa S/O Govindaiah Aged 31 Years 2. Shobha D/O Govindaiah Aged 29 Years Accused Nos.1 And 2 Are R/At Avaragere Village Amruthur Hobli Kunigal Taluk Tumakuru District. 3. Rangaswamy S/O Rangaiah Aged 46 Years 4. Lakshmamma W/O Rangaswamy Aged 35 Years 2 Cr.Misc.86/2009 Accused Nos.3 And 4 Are R/At No.16, 1St Main, 1St Cross Next To Basavanna Temle Kamalanagar Bengaluru - 560 079. .. Accused Date of offence 23-06-2008 Date of report of offence 23-06-2008 Date of arrest of the accused 24-06-2008 (A1) Date of release on bail 04-06-2009 (A1) Total period of custody 11 Months 10 Days (A1) Name of the complainant Smt.Varalakshmi / Dr.G.Ramesh Date of commencement of 02-11-2009 recording of evidence Date of closing of evidence 26-02-2014 Offences complained of 498A, 306, 304B of I.P.C. Opinion of the Judge Accused found not guilty State represented by Learned Public Prosecutor Accused defended by Shri.K.B.K.Swamy, Advocate Judgment
[ { "end": 93, "label": "COURT", "start": 16 }, { "end": 128, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 118 }, { "end": 324, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 306 }, { "end": 437, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 428 }, { "end": 492, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 486 }, { "end": 677, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 667 }, { "end": 734, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 724 }, { "end": 1694, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1683 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras Dated: 17/04/2006 Coram The Hon'ble Mr.Justice N.Paul Vasanthakumar Writ Petition No.4421 of 2006 W.P.M.P.No.4736 of 2006 1. N.S.Balasubramanian 2. Koshy Kuruvilla 3. A.R.Subramanian 4. B.Balasubramania Iyer 5. V.Marimuthu 6. E.Selvanayagam 7. T.R.Jaya Lakshmi 8. Siva Shanmugham 9. C.R.narayana Pillai 10. V.Prakasham 11. C.P.Sukumar 12. K.Chandra 13. D.Uma Devi 14. M.Papaiah Naidu 15. S.Meenakshi Sundaram 16. N.Sundaram 17. P.R.Anantha Raman 18. V.Chellian 19. P.M.Rudramani ... Petitioners -Vs- 1. Food Corporation of India, rep.by the Chairman and Managing Director, Headquarters, 16-20, Barakhama Lane, New Delhi 110 001. 2. The Executive Director (South) Food Corporation of India Zonal Office, No.3, Haddows Road, Chennai 600 006. 3. The General Manager, Food Corporation of India, Regional Officer, Greams Road, Chennai 600 006. ... Respondents This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to extend the benefits arising from the judgment of the Honourable Kerala High Court in O.P.No.13651 of 2001 dated 20.10.2003 and confirmed by the Division Bench of the Honourable Kerala High Court in W.A.No.293 of 2004 as well as by the Honourable Supreme Court in S.L.P. No.20319 of 2005 to the petitioners herein, who are identically situated by stepping up of the petitioners' pay on par with that of their junior Rajan C.Abraham, with effect from 2.1.1993 with all the consequential benefits including arrears of pay etc. !For Petitioner : Mr.Vijay Narayan, Sr.Counsel for Mr.R.Parthiban ^For 1st Respondent : Mr.R.Muthukumaraswamy Addl. Advocate General for Mr.P.D.Audikesavalu :O R D E R
[ { "end": 41, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 125, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 105 }, { "end": 218, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 199 }, { "end": 242, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 227 }, { "end": 266, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 251 }, { "end": 296, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 275 }, { "end": 316, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 305 }, { "end": 339, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 325 }, { "end": 364, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 348 }, { "end": 388, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 373 }, { "end": 417, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 398 }, { "end": 437, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 426 }, { "end": 458, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 447 }, { "end": 476, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 467 }, { "end": 495, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 485 }, { "end": 519, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 504 }, { "end": 548, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 528 }, { "end": 569, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 559 }, { "end": 595, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 578 }, { "end": 615, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 605 }, { "end": 637, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 624 }, { "end": 731, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 698 }, { "end": 988, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 870 }, { "end": 1124, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1003 }, { "end": 1919, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1906 }, { "end": 1982, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1971 }, { "end": 2037, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2019 }, { "end": 2150, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2134 } ]
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam Crl.MC.No. 702 of 2011() 1. Mehaboob, Aged 43 Years, S/O. Koya ... Petitioner Vs 1. The State, Rep. By The City Traffic ... Respondent For Petitioner :Sri.Nirmal. S For Respondent : No Appearance The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Thomas P.Joseph Dated :30/03/2011 O R D E R 'Cr' Thomas P Joseph, J. ---------------------------------------- Crl.M.C.No.702 of 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this 30th day of March, 2011 Order
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 80, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 72 }, { "end": 188, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 183 }, { "end": 303, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 297 }, { "end": 396, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 381 }, { "end": 533, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 518 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras Dated: 02.01.2007 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice P.D.Dinakaran And The Honourable Mrs.Justice Chitra Venkataraman Tax Case Reference Nos.87 to 94 of 2001 The Commissioner of Income Tax Coimbatore. ..Applicant in all T.Cs. Vs. M/s. Sakthi Finance Ltd. Coimbatore. ..Respondent in all T.Cs. For Applicant :: Mr.T.Ravikumar For Respondent :: Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai in R.A. Nos.253 to 260/Mds/97 in I.T.A. Nos.3260/Mds/90, 1996/Mds/91, 2175/Mds/95, 2174/Mds/93, 1573/Mds/96, 1574/Mds/96, 1338/Mds/96 and 2586/Mds/92 for the assessment years 1987-88, 1988-89, 1990-91, 1991-92, 1992-93, 1993-94 and 1989-90. J U D G M E N T
[ { "end": 41, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 169, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 156 }, { "end": 256, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 237 }, { "end": 353, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 316 }, { "end": 548, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 529 }, { "end": 706, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 695 }, { "end": 752, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 736 } ]
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam Crl.MC.No. 4160 of 2009() 1. Perumapallipad Payyuril Hydru Haji, ... Petitioner 2. Perumapallipad Payyuril Fasalu, 3. Perumapallippad Payyuril Anwar, Vs 1. The State Of Kerala, Represented By ... Respondent 2. Royal Hospital (P) Ltd., For Petitioner :Sri.C.P.Mohammed Nias For Respondent :Sri.Millu Dandapani The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.Sasidharan Nambiar Dated :24/11/2010 O R D E R M.Sasidharan Nambiar, J. -------------------------- Crl.M.C.No.4160 of 2009 -------------------------- Order
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 107, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 73 }, { "end": 180, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 150 }, { "end": 215, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 185 }, { "end": 270, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 255 }, { "end": 358, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 335 }, { "end": 415, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 398 }, { "end": 469, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 454 }, { "end": 515, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 495 }, { "end": 581, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 561 } ]
The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi % Judgment delivered on: 10.01.2013 + W.P.(C) 14562/2006 Ntpc Ltd ... Petitioner versus Dcit & Others ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr S. E. Dastur, Sr Advocate with Mr Muralidhar, Ms Bindu Saxena, Ms Aparajita Swarup, Ms Neha Khattar and Mr K. K. Patra For the Respondents : Ms Prem Lata Bansal, Sr Advocate with Mr Ruchir Bhatia Coram:- Hon'Ble Mr Justice Badar Durrez Ahmed Hon'Ble Ms Justice Veena Birbal Judgment
[ { "end": 36, "label": "COURT", "start": 4 }, { "end": 147, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 139 }, { "end": 269, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 265 }, { "end": 425, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 413 }, { "end": 486, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 476 }, { "end": 503, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 491 }, { "end": 553, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 508 }, { "end": 570, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 558 }, { "end": 589, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 578 }, { "end": 638, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 622 }, { "end": 702, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 689 }, { "end": 748, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 730 }, { "end": 780, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 768 } ]
In The Court Of Shri Raj Kumar: Addl. District Judge­17 (Central) : Tis Hazari Courts : Delhi Suit No. 107/14 (Old Suit no. 239/10/04) Unique Case Id No. 02401C0024942004 Avinash Chandra Jain, S/o Late Shri Areh Dass Jain, R/o 103, Pushpanjali, Vikas Marg Extension, Delhi. ........... Plaintiff. Versus Ravi Chand Jain (since deceased) Through legal heirs :­ 1. Smt. Trishla Jain, Widow of Sh. Ravi Chand Jain, 2. Sh. Kapil Jain, S/o Late Sh. Ravi Chand Jain, 3. Sh. Vikas Jain, S/o Late Sh. Ravi Chand Jain, All R/o 1st & 2nd Floor of front portion of H. No. 4510­12, 7/33, Darya Ganj, Ansari Road, New Delhi­110002 ......... Defendants. Date of institution of the suit : 10.08.2004 Date on which order was reserved: 13.02.2014 Date of decision : 01.03.2014 Suit No. 107/14 (Old Suit No. 239/10/04) Page No. 1/51 Suit For Possession, Recovery Of Mesne Profits & Injunction Judgment
[ { "end": 30, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 21 }, { "end": 99, "label": "COURT", "start": 32 }, { "end": 208, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 188 }, { "end": 451, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 436 } ]
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam WP(C).No. 30948 of 2009(Q) 1. Dr. Preceline George @ Antony Preceline ... Petitioner Vs 1. State Of Kerala Represented By The Chief ... Respondent 2. Bency.N.L, (Treesa Bency) Aged 26 Years, For Petitioner :Sri.Santhan V.Nair For Respondent : No Appearance The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.Sasidharan Nambiar Dated :07/01/2010 O R D E R M.Sasidharan Nambiar,J. =========================== W.P.(C)No. 30948 Of 2009 =========================== Dated this the 7th day of January,2010 Judgment
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 113, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 78 }, { "end": 201, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 186 }, { "end": 284, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 275 }, { "end": 368, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 354 }, { "end": 463, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 443 }, { "end": 528, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 508 } ]
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam OP.No. 27937 of 2001(A) 1. Forum For Social Justice ... Petitioner Vs 1. State Of Kerala ... Respondent For Petitioner :Sri.R.Surendran For Respondent :Government Pleader The Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.Siri Jagan Dated :07/09/2009 O R D E R S. Siri Jagan, J ............................................... O.P.No. 27937 of 2001 ................................................. Dated this the 7th day of September, 2009 J U D G M E N T
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 96, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 72 }, { "end": 182, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 167 }, { "end": 276, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 265 }, { "end": 367, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 355 }, { "end": 440, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 427 } ]
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras Dated: 11/04/2002 Coram The Honourable Mr. Justice V.S. Sirpurkar and The Honourable Mr. Justice Malai Subramanian and The Honourable Mr. Justice A. Packiaraj H.C.P. No.1633 of 2001 and H.C.P.No. 1152 Of 2001 Hidaya Banu :: Petitioner in Hcp 1633/2001 Mohamed Razick @ Ponnambalam :: Petitioner in Hcp 1152/2001 :versus: 1. State of Tamil Nadu rep. by Secretary to Govt. Public (Sc) Department Fort St. George Chennai – 600 009 :: R1 in both the HCPs 2. State of Tamil Nadu rep. by Secretary to Govt. Public (L & O) Department Fort St. George Chennai – 600 009 :: R2 in Hcp 1152/2001 3. Union of India, rep. by Secretary to Government Ministry of Finance R2 in Hcp 1633/2001 New Delhi – 1 :: R3 in Hcp 1152/2001 4. The Superintendent Central Prison Chennai :: R3 in Hcp 1633/2001 Petitions under Art.226 of the Constitution for a Writ of Habeas Corpus as stated in the petitions !For Petitioners :: Mr. Habibullah Basha, S.C. For Mr. M.M. Abdul Huck (in Hcp No.1633 of 2001) Mr. C.T. Subbiah (in Hcp No.1152 of 2001) ^For Respondents :: Mr. I. Subramanian, Public Prosecutor for R1 & R3 Mr. K. Raviananthapadmanabhan A.C.G.S.C. For R2 in H.C.P.No.1633 of 2001 Mr. Su. Srinivasan, A.C.G.S.C. for R3 in H.C.P. No.1152 of 2001 :Order
[ { "end": 48, "label": "COURT", "start": 9 }, { "end": 119, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 104 }, { "end": 169, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 152 }, { "end": 215, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 202 }, { "end": 281, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 270 }, { "end": 368, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 340 }, { "end": 478, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 459 }, { "end": 638, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 619 }, { "end": 796, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 782 }, { "end": 1002, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 957 }, { "end": 1203, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1187 }, { "end": 1255, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1239 }, { "end": 1337, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1325 }, { "end": 1423, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1409 }, { "end": 1527, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1502 }, { "end": 1654, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1640 } ]
1 In The High Court Of Karnataka At Bangalore Dated This The 22Nd Day Of March, 2013 Before The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar Miscellaneous First Appeal No. 4363/2009(Mv) C/W Miscellaneous First Appeal No. 609/2009 M.F.A.4363/2009 Between: 1. Smt.Saramma, Aged About 45 Years, 2. Abubacker Siddique, Aged 26 Years, 3. Mumtaz, Aged 22 Years, 4. Issac, Aged 21 Years, 5. Kairunnisa, Aged 17 Years, 6. Saifunnisa, Aged 16 Years, (Appellant Nos.5 & 6 Are Minors And Represented By Their Next Friend Mother-Appellant No.1 As Guardian) Appellant No.1 Is The Wife And 2 Appellant No.2 To 6 Are The Childeren Of K.M.Mohmmed And All Are Residing At Morankala House, Nelljady Village & Post, Puttur Taluk, D.K. ...Appellants (By Sri.Pundikai Ishwara Bhat, Adv.) And: 1. D.Jagadish, Major, S/O Dore Swamy Naidu, No.625, 80, Pete Road, 2Nd Block, Dr.Rajkumar Road, Bangalore-10. 2. United India Insurance Co.Ltd., B.O.No.89, 11Th Cross, Sampige Road, Malleshwaram, Bangalore, Reptd. By Its Manager. 3. Mohammed Basheer, Major, S/O Abdul Rahiman Badria Cross Road, Bunder, Mangalore, D.K. 4. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Rama Bhavan Complex, Kodialbail, Mangalore, Rep. By Its Manager. 5. The Divisional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd., Divisional Office, Bharath Building, P.M.Rao Road, 3 Mangalore ...Respondents (By Sri.P.B.Raju, Adv. For R2; Sri.R.Rajagopalan, Adv. For R4; Sri.A.Ravi Shankar, Adv. For R5; Notice To R1 And R3 Held Sufficient V/O Dated 1.2.13) This Mfa Is Filed U/S.173(1) Of Mv Act Against The Judgment And Award Dated 17.10.2008 Passed In Mvc No.1657/1999 On The File Of The Member, Mact, Puttur, D.K, Partly Allowing The Claim Petition For Compensation And Seeking Enchancement Of Compensation. M.F.A.609/2009 Between: The Divisional Manager, National Insurance Company Limited, Divisional Office, Bharath Building, P.M.Rao Road, Mangalore. Represented By: The Regional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd., Regional Office, Shubharam Complex, 144, M.G.Road, Bangalore, By Its Manager. ...Appellant (By Sri.A.Ravishankar, Adv.) And: 4 1. Smt.Saramma, Aged About 45 Years, W/O Late K.M.Mohammed, 2. Abubacker Siddique, Aged About 26 Years, S/O Late K.M.Mohammed. 3. Mumtaz, Aged About 22 Years, D/O Late K.M.Mohammed. 4. Issac, Aged About 21 Years, S/O Late K.M.Mohammed. 5. Kairunnisa, Aged About 18 Years, D/O Late K.M.Mohammed. 6. Saifunnisa, Aged About 17 Years, D/O Late K.M.Mohammed. Minor Represented By Her Natural Guardian Mother Smt.Saramma, Claimant No.1 7. Khatizamma, Aged About 74 Years, W/O Late K.N.Sulaiman, Dead By Lr'S Of Respondents 1-6 8. D.Jagadish, S/O Dore Swamy Naidu, Aged About 45 Years, No.625, 80, Pete Road, 2Nd Block, Dr.Rajkumar Road, Bangalore-10. 9. United India Insurance Co.Ltd., B.O.No.89, 11Th Cross, 5 Sampige Road, Malleshwaram, Bangalore, Reptd. By Its Manager. 10. Mohammed Basheer, Aged About 48 Years, S/O Abdul Rahiman Badria Cross Road, Bunder, Mangalore. 11. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Rama Bhavan Complex, Kodialbail, Mangalore0560010. ...Respondents (By Sri.Pundikai Ishwar Bhat, Adv. For R1 - R6; Sri.P.B.Raju, Adv. For R9; Sri.R.Rajagopalan, Adv. For R11; R1 To R6 Are Treated As Lr'S Of R7; Service Of Notice To R8 And R10 Held Sufficient V/O Dated 1.2.13) This Mfa Is Filed U/S.173(1) Of Mv Act Against The Judgment And Award Dated 17.10.2008 Passed In Mvc No.1657/1999 On The File Of The Member, Mact, Puttur, D.K, Awarding A Compensation Of Rs.3,11,732/- With Interest At 6% P.A Fromj 20.08.2005 Till Deposit. These MFAs Coming On For Final Hearing This Day, The Court Delivered The Following: Judgment
[ { "end": 54, "label": "COURT", "start": 18 }, { "end": 180, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 167 }, { "end": 360, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 353 }, { "end": 416, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 398 }, { "end": 454, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 448 }, { "end": 491, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 486 }, { "end": 533, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 523 }, { "end": 575, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 565 }, { "end": 993, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 972 }, { "end": 1025, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1015 }, { "end": 1188, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1158 }, { "end": 1334, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1318 }, { "end": 1472, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1444 }, { "end": 1757, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1579 }, { "end": 1817, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1809 }, { "end": 1856, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1843 }, { "end": 1896, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1882 }, { "end": 2401, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2285 }, { "end": 2625, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2612 }, { "end": 2687, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2680 }, { "end": 2834, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2828 }, { "end": 2901, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2896 }, { "end": 2973, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 2963 }, { "end": 3045, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 3035 }, { "end": 3194, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 3184 }, { "end": 3303, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 3293 }, { "end": 3475, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 3445 }, { "end": 3650, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 3634 }, { "end": 3792, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 3764 }, { "end": 3943, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 3923 }, { "end": 3980, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 3972 }, { "end": 4017, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 4004 } ]
ITXA523.13.doc In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Income Tax Appeal No. 523 Of 2013 Commissioner of Income-Tax Ii, Thane, ] 6th floor, B Wing, Ashar I.T. Park Road, ] 16Z, Wagle Estate, Thane 401 604 ] ... Appellant Versus Continental Warehousing Corporation ] (Nhava Sheva) Ltd., D.No.1088, ] Khopta Village, Tal. Uran, Dist. Raigad, ] ... Respondent ig With Income Tax Appeal No. 1969 Of 2013 Commissioner of Income-Tax. Central-IV, ] Room No.663, 6th Floor, Aayakar Bhawan, ] M.K.Road, Mumbai - 400 020 ] ... Appellant Versus All Cargo Global Logistics Ltd., ] th 5 floor, Diamond Square, Cst Road, ] Kalina, Santacruz (East), Mumbai-400 098. ] ... Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellants in Itxa Nos. 523 of 2013. Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Appellants in Itxa No. 1969/2013. Mr. S.E. Dastur, senior counsel with Mr. B.V. Jhaveri and Mr. Madhur Agarwal for the Respondents in Itxa No. 1969/2013. Srp 1/61 ITXA523.13.doc Mr. Nishit Gandhi i/b Mr. Vipul Joshi for the Respondents in Itxa No. 523 of 2013. Coram : S.C. Dharmadhikari & A.K. Menon, Jj. Tuesday, 21St April, 2015 Oral Judgment
[ { "end": 70, "label": "COURT", "start": 36 }, { "end": 588, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 394 }, { "end": 793, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 758 }, { "end": 1360, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 1238 }, { "end": 1466, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1435 }, { "end": 1633, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1621 }, { "end": 1706, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1694 }, { "end": 1771, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1760 }, { "end": 1809, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1797 }, { "end": 1838, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1818 }, { "end": 2259, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2246 }, { "end": 2279, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2268 }, { "end": 2589, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 2579 } ]
In The Court Of Sh. Ravinder Singh­Ii, Metropolitan Magistrate (Ni) Act - 07 Dwarka Courts, New Delhi. Case No. : 4853/14 Unique Case Id No: 02405R0189612011 Sumit Katyal R/o D­1/65 Janakpuri, New Delhi­110046 ........................... Complainant Vs. 1 Rajeev Kapoor R/o D­130, 6th Floor, Rohit Apartment Sector­10, Dwarka, New Delhi 110075 Also At: C/o Avdesh Kapoor/Sanjeev Kapoor C4E, Janakpuri, New Delhi 110058 2 Priya Kapoor R/o D­130, 6th Floor, Rohit Apartment Sector­10, Dwarka, New Delhi 110075.......................... Accused Date of Institution: 03.06.2011 Plea of the accused persons: Pleaded Not Guilty Date of Reserving Judgment: 03/06/2014 Date of Judgment: 31/07/2014 Sentence/final Order: Accused No. 1 Convicted Accused No. 2 Acquitted Judgment
[ { "end": 37, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 20 }, { "end": 158, "label": "COURT", "start": 39 }, { "end": 251, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 239 }, { "end": 425, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 412 }, { "end": 648, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 636 } ]
1 WPlodg1718-12 In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Writ Petition (Lodging) No.1718 Of 2012 Susme Builders Private Limited a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, and having its registered office at Unit No.F-1 1st floor, Shanti Nagar Industrial Estate Ltd., Vakola, Santacruz (East), Mumbai 400 055 ... Petitioner Versus 1. Chief Executive Officer Slum Rehabilitation Authority having his office at Anant Kanekar Marg, Bandra East, Mumbai 400 050. 2. High Power Committee having its office at Anant Kanekar Marg, Bandra East, Mumbai 400 050. 3. Om Namo Sujalam Sufalam Co-operative Housing Society, a Society registered under the provisions of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, Having its registered office at Shivaji Nagar Shree Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Marg, Vakola Bridge, Santacruz (E) Mumbai 400 055. ... Respondents 2 WPlodg1718-12 Mr.Aspi Chinoy, Senior advocate with Mr.Pradeep Sancheti, Senior advocate, Mr Aniruddha Joshi, Mr.Rohan Cama, Mr. H.A.Thakore i/by M/s Thakore Jariwala Asso., for petitioner Mr.Ravi Kadam, Senior advocate with Mr.G.D.Uttangale and Mr.B.V.Phadnis i/b Uttangale & Co., for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.P.K.Samdani, Senior advocate with Snehal Shah, Mr.Naushad Engineer & Ms Dipti Panda i/by Narayan & Narayan, for respondent No.3. Mr.V.R.Dhond, Senior advocate i/b. Rakesh Agarwal, for the Intervenors. Coram : Mohit S. Shah, C.J. & N.M. Jamdar J. Judgment
[ { "end": 110, "label": "COURT", "start": 76 }, { "end": 401, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 371 }, { "end": 1000, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 848 }, { "end": 1135, "label": "COURT", "start": 1026 }, { "end": 1214, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 1152 }, { "end": 1598, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1587 }, { "end": 1640, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1624 }, { "end": 1677, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1662 }, { "end": 1692, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1682 }, { "end": 1709, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1698 }, { "end": 1771, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1761 }, { "end": 1810, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1797 }, { "end": 1829, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1818 }, { "end": 1894, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1883 }, { "end": 1949, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1933 }, { "end": 1966, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 1955 }, { "end": 2024, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2015 }, { "end": 2061, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 2047 }, { "end": 2108, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 2095 }, { "end": 2128, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 2117 } ]
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam CRL.A.No. 1504 of 2004() 1. Palraj @ Appukuttan, S/O.Thankayyan, ... Petitioner Vs 1. State Of Kerala, Rep. By The ... Respondent For Petitioner :Sri.P.Vijaya Bhanu For Respondent :Public Prosecutor The Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.Balakrishnan Nair The Hon'ble Mrs. Justice M.C.Hari Rani Dated :11/06/2008 O R D E R
[ { "end": 40, "label": "COURT", "start": 7 }, { "end": 91, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 72 }, { "end": 196, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 181 }, { "end": 306, "label": "LAWYER", "start": 292 }, { "end": 403, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 384 }, { "end": 442, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 429 } ]