text
stringlengths 14
24k
| entities
listlengths 0
68
|
---|---|
Petitioner:
The Corporation Of Calcutta
Vs.
Respondent:
Sm. Padma Debi And Others
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 39,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 16
},
{
"end": 73,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 63
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated : 07.03.2011
Coram
The Honourable Mr.Justice D.Murugesan
And
The Honourable Mr.Justice K.K.Sasidharan
C.M.A.No.3700 of 2010
M/s Meenakshisundaram Textiles
1st Floor, Sona Towers
72, Millers Road, Bangalore-52
rep by its Managing Director .. Appellant
-vs-
M/s Valliammal Textiles Ltd.,
No.50/1, Aandipalayam, Mangalam Road
Tiruppur .. Respondent
Memorandum of Grounds of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal under Order Xliii Rule 1(d) of Civil Procedure Code against the order and decretal order dated 26.8.2010 made in I.A.No.1776 of 2009 in O.S.No.16 of 2005 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge cum Fast Track Court No.5, Tiruppur.
For Appellant :: Mr.V.Raghavachari
for Mr.AR.M.Arunachalam
For Respondent :: Mr.S.K.Raghunathan
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 107,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 96
},
{
"end": 152,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 138
},
{
"end": 207,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 181
},
{
"end": 342,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 318
},
{
"end": 751,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 737
},
{
"end": 782,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 766
},
{
"end": 823,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 808
}
] |
Petitioner:
M/S. J. K. Cotton Spinning & Weaving Nulls Co. Ltd.
Vs.
Respondent:
Sales Tax Officer, Kanpur And Another
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 64,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 18
},
{
"end": 109,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 84
}
] |
In The Court Of Ajay Goel, Additional District Judge-12
Central District:Delhi
(Old Case)
Pc-39/13/05
In the Matter of:
1. Rajesh Nagpal
s/o Sh. Om Prakash Nagpal,
r/o A-4, Inderprastha Society,
Sector-14, Rohini, Delhi.
2. Smt. Neenu Nagpal
w/o Sh. Rajesh Nagpal
r/o A-4, Inderprastha Society,
Sector-14, Rohini, Delhi.
.................. Petitioner
Versus
1. The State
2. Smt. Brij Bala Kapoor
w/o Sh. Vijay Kapoor
r/o Jasmal Building,
Lawrence Road, Amritsar,
Punjab.
3. Sh. Nand Lal Nagpal
s/o Sh. Hari Ram Nagpal
r/o 205, Shastri Nagar,
Amritsar, Punjab.
4. Sh. Tilak Raj Kathuria
s/o late Sh. D.N. Kathuria
r/o 130/53, P.G.H. Shah Road,
Jadavpur, Kolkata-32
5. Smt. Sheela Kathuria
w/o Sh. Tilak Raj Kathuria
r/o 130/53, P.G.H. Shah Road,
Pc-39/13/05 Page:-1/46
Jadavpur, Kolkata-32
6. Sh. Lalit Narula
s/o Sh. Ram Prakash Narula
r/o 110/1-B, Amherst Street
Kolkata-9
7. Sh. Om Prakash Nagpal (since expired)
s/o Sh. Panna Lal Nagpal
r/o F-104-A, Ekta Society,
Sector-13, Rohini, Delhi.
through his LRs :-
(i) Mrs. Shefali Malhotra
d/o late Om Parkash Nagpal
w/o Sh. Parveen Malhotra
r/o A-61, Prashant Vihar,
Sector-14, Rohini, Delhi-110085.
ii) Mrs. Namrita Gulati
d/o of late Om Prakash Nagpal
w/o Sh. Sandeep Gulati
r/o B-292, Prashant Vihar, Delhi.
iii) Rajesh Nagpal
s/o Sh. Om Prakash Nagpal
r/o A-4, Inderprastha Apartment
Sector-14, Delhi, Rohini-110085
(disowned by respondent no. 7 Om Prakash and his wife
on 7.2.97)
................ Respondents
Date of Institution: 28.3.05
Date of Assignment to this court: 6.7.13(At the stage of Re)
Date of Arguments: 5.11.14
Date of Decision: 17.11.14
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 25,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 16
},
{
"end": 103,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 27
},
{
"end": 205,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 192
},
{
"end": 342,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 330
},
{
"end": 587,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 582
},
{
"end": 617,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 601
},
{
"end": 756,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 741
},
{
"end": 877,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 859
},
{
"end": 1008,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 993
},
{
"end": 1213,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1201
},
{
"end": 1336,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1319
},
{
"end": 1521,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1505
},
{
"end": 1722,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1708
},
{
"end": 1880,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1867
}
] |
Case No.:
Appeal (crl.) 745 of 2000
Petitioner:
State of Rajasthan
Respondent:
Kashi Ram
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 68,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 50
},
{
"end": 91,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 82
}
] |
Id No. 02403R0158332009
In The Court Of Sh. Vinay Kumar Khanna:
Additional Sessions Judge - 04 & Special Judge (Ndps)
South East: Saket Courts: Delhi
Sessions Case No. 02/2011
Unique Id no. 02403R0158332009
Fir No. 398/2007
U/s : 308/341/506/34 Ipc
Ps : Kalkaji
State
Versus
Bimlesh Yadav
w/o Sh. Mukesh Yadav
r/o H. No. B-621, Transit Camp,
Govind Puri , New Delhi ..........Accused no. 1
Mukesh Yadav @ Fauji
s/o Sh. Prakash Yadav
r/oH. No. B-621, Transit Camp,
Govind Puri , New Delhi ..........Accused no. 2
Instituted on : 20th January, 2011
Argued on : 08th May,2013
Decided on : 23rd May, 2013
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 82,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 64
},
{
"end": 200,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 94
},
{
"end": 482,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 477
},
{
"end": 505,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 492
},
{
"end": 658,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 638
}
] |
1 AaO415-14
Farad Continuation Sheet No.
In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
Appeal From Order | [
{
"end": 241,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 207
}
] |
Case No.:
Appeal (civil) 6277 of 2004
Petitioner:
United India Insurance Co.Ltd.
Respondent:
M/s.Harchand Rai Chandan Lal
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 82,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 52
},
{
"end": 125,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 101
}
] |
6
*In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi
+ MAC.APP.No.13/2007
Date of Decision: 14th July, 2009
%
National Insurance Co.Ltd. ..... Appellant
Through : Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey, Adv.
versus
Farzana Ors. ..... Respondents
Through : Mr. Arun Srivastava and
Ms. Anupama Srivastava, Advs.
for R - 1 & 2.
Coram :-
The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice J.R. Midha
1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may Yes
be allowed to see the Judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes
3. Whether the judgment should be Yes
reported in the Digest?
Judgment | [
{
"end": 42,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 10
},
{
"end": 194,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 168
},
{
"end": 267,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 250
},
{
"end": 322,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 315
},
{
"end": 412,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 397
},
{
"end": 464,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 446
},
{
"end": 556,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 546
}
] |
In The Court Of Ms. Anu Malhotra
District & Sessions Judge / Arct (West) : Delhi
Arct23/2013
Unique Id No. 02401C0079792013
Leela Ahuja
W/o Late S.N. Ahuja,
R/o 1st Floor, 13/27,
East Patel Nagar, New Delhi - 110 008 ............ Appellant
Versus
1. Tanjeet Singh Ghai
2. Baljeet Singh Ghai
Both sons of Late Sarup Singh Ghai
3. Manveet Chopra
D/o Shri Sarup Singh Ghai,
All R/o 25/29, East Patel Nagar,
New Delhi - 110 008. ............Respondents
Date of Institution : 20.02.2013
Date of reserving the judgment : 21.08.2013
Date of pronouncement of : 01.07.2014
Judgment
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 32,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 20
},
{
"end": 87,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 40
},
{
"end": 145,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 134
},
{
"end": 324,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 306
},
{
"end": 356,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 338
},
{
"end": 432,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 418
}
] |
Case No.:
Appeal (crl.) 212-216 of 2000
Petitioner:
Kusum Ingots And Alloys Ltd.
Respondent:
Pennar Peterson Securities Ltd. And Ors.
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 82,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 54
},
{
"end": 127,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 96
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
Wp(C) No. 24258 of 2007(K)
1. J.Prabhavathiamma, D/O. Jagathamma,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. The State Of Kerala, Rep. By
... Respondent
2. The Director General Of Police,
3. The Superintendent Of Police,
4. The Director,
For Petitioner :Sri.Siraj Karoly
For Respondent :Sri.S.Sreekumar, Sc For Cbi
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B.Koshy
The Hon'ble Mrs. Justice K.Hema
Dated :20/09/2007
O R D E R
| [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 91,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 74
},
{
"end": 201,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 186
},
{
"end": 289,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 263
},
{
"end": 323,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 299
},
{
"end": 342,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 333
},
{
"end": 393,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 381
},
{
"end": 443,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 432
},
{
"end": 490,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 481
},
{
"end": 522,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 516
}
] |
In The Court Of Shri Manoj Kumar : Additional
Sessions Judge4 (South District), New Delhi
Criminal Appeal No. 01/14 (Original no. 58/13)
Unique Id No.: 02406R0035022013
In the matter of:
Nitin Chaudhary,
S/o Sh. Ved Chaudhary,
R/o G93, Lgf, Saket,
New Delhi110017. ................Appellant
Versus
Amit Khaneja,
S/o Sh. Ashok Khaneja,
R/o A12/4, Rana Pratap Bagh,
Delhi110007. ............Respondent
Date of Institution : 08.02.2013
Date of Reserving judgment: 29.5.2014
Date of pronouncement : 31.5.2014
For Appellant : Mr. Khalil A. Ansari, Advocate.
Criminal Appeal No. 01/14 Page no. 1 of 28
For Respondent : Mr. R. P. Sharma, Advocate.
Judgment | [
{
"end": 32,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 21
},
{
"end": 96,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 35
},
{
"end": 250,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 235
},
{
"end": 463,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 451
},
{
"end": 835,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 819
},
{
"end": 996,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 984
}
] |
Case No.:
Appeal (crl.) 617 of 2000
Petitioner:
Ramesh Kumar
Respondent:
State Of Chhattisgarh
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 62,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 50
},
{
"end": 97,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 76
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated :: 12-07-2010
Coram
The Honourable Mr.Justice V.Dhanapalan
Writ Petition No.9077 of 2010
A.K.Viswanathan ... Petitioner
-vs-
1.State of Tamil Nadu,
rep.by the Principal Secretary to Government,
Home Department,
Fort St.George,
Chennai-600 009.
2.The Chief Secretary to Government,
Fort St.George,
Chennai-600 009.
3.The Vigilance Commissioner,
Fort St.George,
Chennai-600 009.
4.The Director,
Vigilance and Anti-Corruption,
Chennai-600 028.
5.Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Vigilance and Anti-Corruption,
Chennai City Iii,
Chennai-600 035. ... Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus.
For petitioner : Mr.V.Selvaraj
For respondents : Mr.P.S.Raman,
Advocate General,
assisted by Mr.N.Senthil Kumar,
Additional Govt.Pleader.
O R D E R
| [
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 111,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 99
},
{
"end": 159,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 144
},
{
"end": 213,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 192
},
{
"end": 400,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 331
},
{
"end": 469,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 408
},
{
"end": 541,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 478
},
{
"end": 652,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 543
},
{
"end": 891,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 881
},
{
"end": 924,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 915
},
{
"end": 984,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 969
}
] |
Case No.:
Appeal (crl.) 921 of 2000
Petitioner:
Bodh Raj @ Bodha And Ors.
Respondent:
State Of Jammu And Kashmir
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 66,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 50
},
{
"end": 115,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 89
}
] |
1
In The High Court Of Karnataka
Dharwad Bench
Dated This The 17Th Day Of January, 2014
Before
The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice K.N. Phaneendra
Criminal Appeal No. 2619/2008
Between:
Pramod
S/O. Adiveppa Kanabargi
Age : 33 Years
R/O. Kacheri Galli,
Macche, Tq. & Dist. Belgaum. .. Appellant
(By Sriyuths Santosh D. Naragund &
Vishwanath V. Badiger, Advocates)
And :
The State Of Karnataka
Through The Belgaum Rural
P. S. Belgaum Now R/By Its Spp
High Court Of Karnataka
Circuit Bench, Dharwad.
... Respondent
(By Sri V.M. Banakar, Addl. S.P.P.)
This Crl.A. Is Filed Under Section 374(2) Of
Cr.P.C Praying To Call For The Records In
S.C.No.227/2007 On The File Of The Fast Track
Court No.Iii And Addl. Sessions Judge, Belgaum
And Set Aside The Judgment/Order Of Conviction
2
Dtd.22/08/2008 And Sentence Dated 23/08/2008
Made In S.C.No.227/2007 Passed By The Fast Track
Court-Iii And Addl. Sessions Judge, Belgaum, For
The Offences Punishable Under Sections 304B
And 498A Of I.P.C. And Grant Such Other And
Further Reliefs.
This Criminal Appeal Coming On For Final
Hearing This Day, The Court Delivered The
Following:
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 80,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 23
},
{
"end": 210,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 195
},
{
"end": 272,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 266
},
{
"end": 422,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 394
},
{
"end": 464,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 443
},
{
"end": 507,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 489
},
{
"end": 688,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 676
}
] |
1 arbp767.09gp.sxw
ssm
In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay
Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction
Arbitration Petition No. 767 Of 2009
Prakash Kumar Sinha ......Petitioner.
Vs.
Konkan Mercantile Co-operative
Bank Ltd. & Ors. ......Respondents.
With
Arbitration Petition No. 677 Of 2009
Akbar Ismail Mansoori ......Petitioner.
Vs.
Konkan Mercantile Co-operative
Bank Ltd. & Ors. ......Respondents.
Mr. Devendra Sharma a/w Mr. Ashwin R. Singh for the Petitioner in
Arbitration Petition No. 767 and for Respondent No. 8 in Arbitration
Petition No. 677 of 2009.
Mr. Vikas Singh a/w Mrs. A.R. Lambay for Respondent No.1 in both
the Petitions.
Mr. H.R. Sharma for the Petitioner in Arbitration Petition No. 677 of
2009 and for Respondent No.8 in Arbitration Petition No. 767 of 2009.
None for the others.
Coram :- Anoop V. Mohta, J.
Date :- 16 March 2012.
Oral Judgment | [
{
"end": 107,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 73
},
{
"end": 384,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 365
},
{
"end": 550,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 506
},
{
"end": 832,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 811
},
{
"end": 951,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 907
},
{
"end": 1040,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1025
},
{
"end": 1064,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1049
},
{
"end": 1216,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1205
},
{
"end": 1237,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1226
},
{
"end": 1306,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1295
},
{
"end": 1526,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1512
}
] |
In The Court Of Ms.RIYA Guha, Mm02
( Negotiable Instruments Act) Central District,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
M/S Aneja Agencies
B14, (Ff), Sangam Market,
Katra Neel , Chandni Chowk, Delhi
Through its partner Mr. Gurpreet Singh ......Complainant
Versus
1. M/S R.K. Apparels
17A/2B, W.E.A, Ajmal Khan Road,
Karol Bagh, New Delhi
Through its partner/proprietor
Mr. Arun Singhal
1. Mr. Arun Singhal, Proprietor
Authorized signatory
M/S R.K. Apparels
17A/2B, W.E.A, Ajmal Khan Road,
Karol Bagh, New Delhi ........Accused
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 28,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 19
},
{
"end": 134,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 30
},
{
"end": 363,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 350
},
{
"end": 512,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 500
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
WP(C).No. 22352 of 2010(T)
1. Mohandas M.K., Junior Accountant,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. State Of Kerala, Represented By The
... Respondent
2. The Registrar Of Co-Operative Societies,
3. The Kottayam District Co-Operative
4. Joy Joseph, Senior Accountant,
5. The Kollam District Co-Operative
6. Tensy Scaria, Senior Accountant,
For Petitioner :Sri.P.Ramakrishnan
For Respondent :Smt.Aysha Youseff,Sc,Kollm District Co-
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.Surendra Mohan
Dated :16/08/2010
O R D E R
K.Surendra Mohan, J
...........................................
WP(C).Nos.22352 & 22888 Of 2010
............................................
Dated This The 16Th Day Of August, 2010
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 87,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 74
},
{
"end": 195,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 180
},
{
"end": 303,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 268
},
{
"end": 333,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 313
},
{
"end": 358,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 348
},
{
"end": 405,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 387
},
{
"end": 432,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 420
},
{
"end": 505,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 491
},
{
"end": 557,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 544
},
{
"end": 621,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 605
},
{
"end": 693,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 677
}
] |
1
In the Court of Dig Vinay Singh : Additional Sessions Judge Spl. Judge : Ndps
(Nw) : District Courts : Rohini : Delhi
In the matter of:
Sc No. : 52/13 (Old Sc no. 31/10)
Fir No. : 364/07
Ps : Bawana
U/s. : 308/34 Ipc
State
Versus
1) Madan Lal
S/o Chhote Lal
R/o F-340, Shahbad Dairy,
Delhi.
2) Mangat Ram
S/o Madan Lal
R/o F-340, Shahbad Dairy,
Delhi.
3) Mohinder Singh
S/o Madan Lal
R/o F-340, Shahbad Dairy,
Delhi.
Date of receipt : 29.03.2010
(Received in this court on : 25.112013)
Date of arguments : 31.01.2014
Date of announcement : 11.02.2014
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 43,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 28
},
{
"end": 157,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 46
},
{
"end": 624,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 619
},
{
"end": 671,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 662
},
{
"end": 771,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 761
},
{
"end": 874,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 860
}
] |
The Honble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta And The Honble Sri Sanjay Kumar
Contempt Case No.965 Of 2013
12-11-2014
T. Madan Mohan Reddy and others. ..Petitioners
Sri B.R. Meena, I.A.S. Principal Secretary to Revenue Department,Andhra
Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad & others.Respondents Counsel for Petitioners: Sri C.V. Mohan Reddy, Senior counsel for Sri N.V. Raghava Reddy.
Counsel for the respondents: Sri P. Venugopal, Advocate General (Ap) Sri L. Ravichander, Amicus-Curiae Sri P. Vishnuvardhan Reddy (Asst. Solicitor General) <Gist:
>Head Note:
? Cases referred
1. Air 2002 Sc 1432
2. Air 1976 Sc 997
3. (2002) 5 Scc 440
4. Air 2007 Sc 1563
5. (2000) 4 Scc 357
6. (2014) 1 Scc 1 The Honble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta And The Honble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar Contempt Case No.965 Of 2013 Dated: 12.11.2014 The Honble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta And The Honble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar Contempt Case No.965 Of 2013 Order | [
{
"end": 54,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 33
},
{
"end": 86,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 74
},
{
"end": 176,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 156
},
{
"end": 219,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 209
},
{
"end": 387,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 371
},
{
"end": 430,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 412
},
{
"end": 479,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 467
},
{
"end": 521,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 507
},
{
"end": 563,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 541
},
{
"end": 811,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 790
},
{
"end": 851,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 839
},
{
"end": 953,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 932
},
{
"end": 993,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 981
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated: 28/01/2005
Coram
The Hon'Ble Mr.Markandey Katju, Chief Justice
and
The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice D.Murugesan
W.A.No.1081 of 2004
and
W.A.M.P.No.1958 of 2004
1. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
rep. by its Secretary,
793, Anna Salai,
Chennai 600 002.
2. The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
793, Anna Salai,
Chennai 600 002. ..Appellants.
-Vs-
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Engineers
Association, Electricity Avenue,
Rep. by its General Secretary Mr.G.Balakrishnan,
793, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002. ..Respondent
Prayer: Appeal against the order of the learned single Judge
dated 08.10.2003, passed in W.P.No.572 of 2002,
as stated therein.
!For Appellants :: Mr.V.Radhakrishnan
^For Respondent :: Mr.A.E.Chelliah, Senior Counsel
For Mr.P.Karunakaran
:J U D G M E N T | [
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 115,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 100
},
{
"end": 182,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 171
},
{
"end": 283,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 255
},
{
"end": 455,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 366
},
{
"end": 554,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 503
},
{
"end": 922,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 907
},
{
"end": 959,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 947
},
{
"end": 1012,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 999
}
] |
1 cri.applns.3618-10, 5640-2009
In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay
Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction
Criminal Application No. 3618 Of 2010
Union of India ...Applicant
vs.
Ravindran Krarapaya @ Ravi & Ors. ...Respondents
With
Criminal Application No. 5640 Of 2009
Union of India ...Applicant
vs.
Xie Jing Feng @ Richard & Anr. ...Respondents
Appearance in above matters :-
Mr.Mandar Goswami, Public Prosecutor and Special
Counsel for the Appellant Union of India.
Mr.Anil Lalla i/b. M/s.Lalla & Lalla for Respondent
Nos.1 and 2 and for respondent no.1 in Cri.Appln.No.
5640/2009.
Mr.Y.M. Nakhwa, App for Respondent No.3 and for
Respondent No.2 in Cri.Appln.No.5640/2009.
Coram : J.H. Bhatia, J.
Dated : November 19, 2010 Oral Judgment | [
{
"end": 91,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 57
},
{
"end": 314,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 300
},
{
"end": 399,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 373
},
{
"end": 607,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 593
},
{
"end": 697,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 674
},
{
"end": 801,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 795
},
{
"end": 915,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 905
},
{
"end": 1051,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1040
},
{
"end": 1185,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1174
}
] |
Petitioner:
Anil Kumar Gupta, Etc.
Vs.
Respondent:
State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors.
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 28,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 76,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 54
}
] |
Petitioner:
Maula Bux
Vs.
Respondent:
Union Of India
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 24,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 55,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 41
}
] |
Petitioner:
Bhagirath Kanoria & Ors. Etc.
Vs.
Respondent:
State Of M.P. & Ors. Etc.
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 29,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 85,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 61
}
] |
Petitioner:
Manohar Lal Chopra
Vs.
Respondent:
Rai Bahadur Rao Raja Seth Hiralal
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 30,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 83,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 50
}
] |
Petitioner:
C.I.T., Punjab, Haryana, J & K, H.P. & Union Territory Ofcha
Vs.
Respondent:
Panipat Woollen & General Mills co. Ltd.Chandigarh
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 72,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 142,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 92
}
] |
Petitioner:
Union Of India And Ors
Vs.
Respondent:
Filip Tiago De Gama Of Vedem Vasco De Gama
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 26,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 96,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 54
}
] |
In The Court Of Sh Sunil K. Aggarwal: Addl. District Judge
(Central) 10: Delhi
Tm: 05/10
Anil Grover
Son of Sh. H. R. Grover
Trading as Foamtex India
Libaspur Road, Libaspur,
Delhi 110042. ..... Plaintiff
Versus
1. Rajeev Aggarwal
Son of Late Sh. K.S.Aggarwal
B2550, Narela Industrial Park,
Delhi - 110040
2. Mohit Foam (India)
B2550, Narela Industrial Park,
Delhi - 110040. .....Defendants
Plaint presented on 19.07.2004
J U D G M E N T
| [
{
"end": 37,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 20
},
{
"end": 109,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 39
},
{
"end": 182,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 171
},
{
"end": 372,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 357
},
{
"end": 463,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 453
}
] |
The Hon'Ble Sri Justice M.S.Ramachandra Rao
C.M.A.Nos.856 of 2003 and Batch
24.04.2013
N.Sree Ramulu and others.
B.Lakshmi Narayana (died) and others
<Gist:
>Head Note:
Counsel for the Appellants : Sri N.Subba Rao and others.
Counsel for the respondents: Sri T.Sree Ramulu and others?Cases referred:
1 Air 1976 S.C. 222 2 2007 (4) Alt 607 (D.B.) 3 2001 (1) Ald 423 4 2001 (1) Ald 435 5 2002 Acj 1392 6 2000 (1) Ald 554 7 1995 (3) Ald 1108 8 Aplj 1991 (2) 337 9 1997 Acj 1141 10 1996 Acj 1253 112004 (6) Ald 534 121995 (1) Ald 205 (2) 13 2001 (3) Ald 177 14 2008 (3) Ald 650 (Db) 15 (2008) 8 S.C.C 518 16 2006 (4) Ald 398 17 2011 1 Scc 343 18 (2010) 13 S.C.C. 777 19 (2010) 10 S.C.C. 341 20 (2010) 10 S.C.C. 347 21 (2008) 9 S.C.C. 492 22 (2007) 2 Scc 349 24 (2009) 6 Scc 280 25 (2012) 2 Scc 2670 C.M.A.Nos.856, 1210 & 2274 of 2001, 335, 550, 1685, 2380 & 3406 of 2002 & 2197 of 2003 Common Judgment | [
{
"end": 43,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 24
},
{
"end": 118,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 105
},
{
"end": 151,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 133
},
{
"end": 247,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 236
},
{
"end": 307,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 294
}
] |
Petitioner:
Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Kerala, Ernakulam
Vs.
Respondent:
Travancore Sugar & Chemicals Ltd.
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 57,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 110,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 77
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated: 18.06.2012
Coram:
The Honourable Ms. Justice R. Mala
Criminal Appeal Nos.814 of 2009 and
8, 33 & 40 of 2010
Badrilal Sharma .. Appellant/A4 (in Crl.A.No.814/2009)
Tofan Singh .. Appellant/A3 (in Crl.A.No.8/2010)
Babulal Jain .. Appellant/A1 (in Crl.A.No.33/2010)
Prem @ Kannan @ Sudeshwaran .. Appellant/A2 (in Crl.A.No.40/2010)
Vs
State by
The Intelligence Officer
Narcotics Control Bureau
South Zonal Unit
Chennai-90. .. Respondent/Complainant (in all cases)Criminal Appeal Nos.814 of 2009 & 33 of 2010 filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C., against the judgment of conviction and sentence, dated 18.12.2009, made in C.C.No.55 of 2005 on the file of the Additional Special Court under Ndps Act, Chennai.
Criminal Appeal Nos.8 of 2010 & 40 of 2010 filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. r/w Section 36-B of Ndps Act, 1985, against the judgment of conviction and sentence, dated 18.12.2009, made in C.C.No.55 of 2005 on the file of the Additional Special Court under Ndps Act, Chennai.
For Appellant/A1 : Mr. N.R.Elango, senior counsel for
Mr.S.T.Raja for M/S.Ohm Sairam
in Crl.A.No.33 of 2010
For Appellant/A2 : Mr.R.C.Paul Kanagaraj in
Crl.A.No.40/2010
For Appellants/A3&A4 : Mr.B.Kumar, senior counsel for
Mr.T.S.Sasikumar in
Crl.A.Nos.814/2009 and 8/2010
For Respondent : Mr.N.P.Kumar, Spl. Public Prosecutor
(in all cases) for Ncb cases.
C O M M O N J U D G M E N T | [
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 111,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 104
},
{
"end": 186,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 171
},
{
"end": 247,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 236
},
{
"end": 320,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 308
},
{
"end": 408,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 381
},
{
"end": 475,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 470
},
{
"end": 1194,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1184
},
{
"end": 1243,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1235
},
{
"end": 1339,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1321
},
{
"end": 1449,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1442
},
{
"end": 1496,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1483
},
{
"end": 1626,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1617
}
] |
In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi
Crl.A. 1051 of 2008
B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing
Counsel with Mr. Deepak
Pathak, Advocate.
versus
Jagat Ram & Anr. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Aditya Sharma proxy for
Mr. S. Satyanarayana, Advocate.
With
Crl.A. 1052 of 2008
B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing
Counsel with Mr. Deepak
Pathak, Advocate
versus
R.K. Gupta & Anr. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Vijay Gupta, Advocate
With
Crl.A. 1053 of 2008
B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing
Counsel with Mr. Deepak
Pathak, Advocate
versus
P.P. Singh & Anr. ..... Respondents
Through: None.
With
Crl. A. Nos.1051 to 1056 of 2008 Page 1 of 15
Crl.A. 1054 of 2008
B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, standing
counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak,
Advocate.
versus
Rajiv Bhasin & Anr. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Mukul Dhawan, Advocate
With
Crl.A. 1055 of 2008
B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing
Counsel with Mr. Deepak
Pathak, Advocate.
versus
Hasibuddin & Anr. ..... Respondents
Through: None.
With
Crl.A. 1056 of 2008
B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing
Counsel with Mr. Deepak
Pathak, Advocate
versus
Grover Restaurant & Caterers & ......Respondents
Through: None.
Coram: Justice S. Muralidhar
Order
| [
{
"end": 39,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 123,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 95
},
{
"end": 200,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 185
},
{
"end": 305,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 260
},
{
"end": 378,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 369
},
{
"end": 497,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 484
},
{
"end": 572,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 556
},
{
"end": 708,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 680
},
{
"end": 784,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 769
},
{
"end": 889,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 844
},
{
"end": 962,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 952
},
{
"end": 1078,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1067
},
{
"end": 1213,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1185
},
{
"end": 1290,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1275
},
{
"end": 1395,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1350
},
{
"end": 1468,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1458
},
{
"end": 1775,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1747
},
{
"end": 1853,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1838
},
{
"end": 1926,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1913
},
{
"end": 2034,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2022
},
{
"end": 2157,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2145
},
{
"end": 2282,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 2254
},
{
"end": 2359,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2344
},
{
"end": 2464,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2419
},
{
"end": 2538,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2528
},
{
"end": 2768,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 2740
},
{
"end": 2847,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2832
},
{
"end": 2952,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2907
},
{
"end": 3019,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 3002
},
{
"end": 3123,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 3110
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated: 4.2.2011
Coram:
The Honourable Mr.Justice P.Jyothimani
W.P.Nos.15646 and 24824 of 2010
V.Lakshmi .. Petitioner
in Wp:15646/2010
T.A.Johnson .. Petitioner
in Wp:24824/2010
Vs.
1. The Government of Tamil Nadu
rep. by its Principal Secretary
Home Department
Fort St.George, Chennai 9.
2. The Director General of Police
Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai
Chennai 4.
3. The Commissioner of Police
Suburban, Chennai 16.
4. The Inspector of Police
S-13, Chromepet Police Station
Chennai 44.
5. The Director
Central Bureau of Investigation
Iii Floor, Block No.3
Cgo Complex, Lodhi Road
New Delhi 3. .. Respondents
in both WPs.
Prayer: Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of a writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent in G.O.Ms.No.593, Home (Pol.VII) Department, dated 25.6.2010 and quash the same as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional.
For Petitioner : R.Thiagarajan, Sr.Counsel
in WP:15646/2010 for M/s.R.Karthikeyan
For Petitioner : Mr.Sriram Panchu, Sr.Counsel
in WP:24824/2010 for M/s.M.Suresh Kumar
For Respondents : Mr.N.Senthil Kumar
1 to 4 in both WPs. Additional Government Pleader
For 5th respondent : Mr.N.Chandrasekaran
in both WPs. Special Government Pleader
Order
| [
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 113,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 101
},
{
"end": 157,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 148
},
{
"end": 217,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 206
},
{
"end": 302,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 278
},
{
"end": 453,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 400
},
{
"end": 525,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 479
},
{
"end": 609,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 538
},
{
"end": 736,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 619
},
{
"end": 1087,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1074
},
{
"end": 1181,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1168
},
{
"end": 1278,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1263
},
{
"end": 1377,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1361
}
] |
State Vs. Sanjay
In The Court Of Sh. Sandeep Gupta: Metropolitan
Magistrate (North): Rohini Court: Delhi.
Fir no. 177/01
Ps Narela
U/s. 279/337 Ipc
Sate Vs. Sanjay
Date of Institution of case:- 01.04.02
Date of Judgment reserved:- 07.02.14
Date on which Judgment pronounced:- 24.03.14
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 5,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 0
},
{
"end": 16,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 10
},
{
"end": 60,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 47
},
{
"end": 127,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 62
},
{
"end": 459,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 455
},
{
"end": 470,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 464
}
] |
(1)
In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay,
Aurangabad Bench, At Aurangabad.
Criminal Revision Application No. 186 of 2011
Ramnath s/o. Yashwant Gholap,
Age : 35 years,
Occupation : Driver,
R/o. Talegaon,
Taluka & District : Beed. .. Applicant.
versus
The State of Maharashtra,
Through Police Inspector,
Police Station, Ashti,
Taluka : Ashti, District : Beed. .. Respondent.
.......................
Mr. S.S. Thombre, Advocate, with
Mr. S.D. Bade, Advocate, for the applicant.
Mr. P.N. Muley, Additional Public Prosecutor,
for the respondent.
........................
Coram : Abhay M. Thipsay, J.
Date of reserving the
judgment : 25th October 2013.
Date of pronouncing the
judgment : 29th November 2013.
(2)
Judgment | [
{
"end": 103,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 22
},
{
"end": 346,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 339
},
{
"end": 690,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 670
},
{
"end": 983,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 971
},
{
"end": 1038,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1029
},
{
"end": 1107,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1097
},
{
"end": 1305,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1289
}
] |
Case No.:
Appeal (crl.) 518 of 2006
Petitioner:
Krishna Janardhan Bhat
Respondent:
Dattatraya G. Hegde
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 72,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 50
},
{
"end": 105,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 86
}
] |
Petitioner:
Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras
Vs.
Respondent:
Ajax Products Ltd. Through Its Liquidator
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 46,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 84,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 66
}
] |
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Jabalpur
Criminal Appeal No.2509/1998
Dwarka Prasad Mishra, Son of Ram Piyare Mishra,
L.D.C., Lower Sihaval Canal Division Churhat
District-Sidhi R/o Village Karah Ps Shapur District
Rewa M.P.
Appellant
Vs.
The State of Madhya Pradesh
Through - Special Police Establishment,
Lok Ayukt Office,
Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh
Respondent
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri Anoop Nair with Shri Siddharth Datt, Adv. for the appellant.
Shri Aditya Adhikari, Special Public Prosecutor for Spe Lokayukta
for respondent.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Db : Hon. Rakesh Saksena & Hon. M.A. Siddiqui, Jj.
Judgment Reserved On 21/09/2011
Judgment Delivered On 28 /09/2011
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 39,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 0
},
{
"end": 136,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 116
},
{
"end": 511,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 488
},
{
"end": 852,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 842
},
{
"end": 877,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 863
},
{
"end": 1122,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1108
},
{
"end": 1143,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1130
}
] |
Before The Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court
Dated: 13/08/2010
Coram
The Honourable Mr.Justice S.Manikumar
Writ Petition (MD)No.10727 of 2006
M.P.(MD)Nos.1 to 3 of 2006
R.Sakthivel, (Sub-Inspector),
Nagamalai Pudukottai Police Station,
Madurai District. ... Petitioner
vs.
1.The Director General of Police,
(Law and Order),
Chennai-600 004.
2.The Additional Director General of Police,
(Law and Order),
Chennai-600 004.
3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police,
Madurai Range,
Madurai.
4.The Additional Superintendent of Police (Crime),
Madurai, Madurai District. ... Respondents
Prayer
Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying
for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the
first respondent made in his proceedings in Rc.No.2395/AP2(3)/2006, dated
17.02.2006, confirming the order of the second respondent made in his
proceedings Rc.No.98967/AP/2(2)/2005 dated 15.07.2005, confirming the order of
the third respondent made in his order No.A2/6953/03 Pr 312/03 'F' order dated
11.01.2005 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to
consider the petitioner for promotion for the next higher post from the date his
juniors were promoted.
!For Petitioner ... Mr.S.Karthik
For Mr.S.Silambanan
^For Respondents ... Mr.K.Balasubramanian,
Additional Government Pleader.
:Order | [
{
"end": 45,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 11
},
{
"end": 109,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 98
},
{
"end": 185,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 174
},
{
"end": 355,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 289
},
{
"end": 441,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 364
},
{
"end": 596,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 523
},
{
"end": 1306,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1297
},
{
"end": 1344,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1332
},
{
"end": 1397,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1380
}
] |
Reportable
In The Supreme Court Of India
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
Civil Appeal No. 1699 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No. 26558 Of 2010)
M/s Topman Exports … Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai … Respondent
With
Civil Appeal No. 1700 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No. 27418 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1701 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.27552 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1704 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.27583 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1705 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No. 27608 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1706 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.27994 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1707 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.28036 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1708 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.28044; of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1709 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.28131 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1710 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.28167 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1711 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.28173 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1728 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.27952 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1729 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.28365 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1730 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.29290 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1731 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.29314 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1732 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.29596 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1733 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30461 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1734 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30462 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1735 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30011 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1736 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30018 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1737 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30020 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1738 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30023 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1739 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30100 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1740 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30281 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1741 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30283 of 2010),
Civil Appeal Nos. 1712 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30289 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1713 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30306 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1714 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30345 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1715 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30374 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1716 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30375 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1717 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30379 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1718 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30381 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1719 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30393 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1720 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30411 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1721 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30426 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1722 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30468 of 2010),
Civil Appeal Nos. 1723-1724 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30521-30522 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1725 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30549 of 2010),
Civil Appeal Nos. 1726-1727 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) Nos.29853-29854 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1742 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30215 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1743 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30378 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1744 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30380 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1745 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30388 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1746 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30390 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1747 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30543 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1748 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30546 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1749 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30572 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1750 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30574 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1754 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30657 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1755 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30569 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1756 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.32066 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1757 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.32069 of 2010),
Civil Appeal Nos. 1758-1759 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) Nos.30733-30734 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1760 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30597 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1761 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30626 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1762 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30634 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1763 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30644 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1764 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30665 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1765 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30671 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1766 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30680 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1767 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30684 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1768 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30689 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1769 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30721 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1770 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30902 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1771 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.31085 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1772 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.31107 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1773 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.31131 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1774 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.31134 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1775 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.31304 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1776 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.31385 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1777 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.31450 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1778 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.31849 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1779 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.32531 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1780 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30628 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1781 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30635 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1782 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30646 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1783 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.32532 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1784 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30647 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1785 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.32533 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1786 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30653 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1787 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30673 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1788 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30674 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1789 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30675 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1790 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30677 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1791 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30686 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1792 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30708 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1793 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.32534 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1794 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.30906 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1795 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.33218 of 2010),
Civil Appeal Nos. 1796-1799 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) Nos.34081-34084 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1800 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.34078 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1801 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.32228 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1802 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.32256 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1803 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.33925 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1804 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.32308 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1805 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.32339 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1806 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.32384 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1807 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.34046 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1808 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.34047 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1809 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.32946 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1810 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.33708 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1811 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.33692 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1812 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.33084 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1813 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.33157 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1814 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.33265 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1815 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.33504 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1816 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.35013 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1817 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.35016 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1818 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.35028 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1819 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.35029 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1820 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.35030 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1821 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.35031 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1822 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.35032 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1823 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.35129 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1824 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.35865 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1825 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.35866 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1826 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.35867 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1827 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.35868 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1828 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.33644 of 2010),
Civil Appeal No. 1829 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.57 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1830 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.136 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1831 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.138 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1832 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.131 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1833 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.132 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1834 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.376 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1835 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.302 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1836 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.428 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1837 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.2755 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1838 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.2756 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1839 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.2757 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1840 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.2759 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1841 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No. 2388 of 2011,
Civil Appeal No. 1842 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.2585 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1843 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.2588 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1844 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.2626 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1845 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.2689 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1846 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.2932 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1847 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.2953 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1848 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.2742 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1850 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.2693 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1851 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.5377 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1852 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.5379 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1853 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.5972 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1854 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.7859 of 2011),
Civil Appeal Nos. 1855-1856 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) Nos.7868-7869 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1858 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.8786 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1859 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.9547 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1860 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.9548 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1861 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.9549 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1862 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.9550 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1863 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.9551 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1864 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.7795 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1865 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.9552 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1866 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.9553 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1867 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.11029 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1868 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.10958 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1869 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.13774 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1870 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.11716 of 2011),
Civil Appeal Nos. 1871-1872 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) Nos.14068-14069 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1873 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.14070 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1874 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.14071 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1875 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.14072 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1876 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.14073 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1877 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.14074 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1878 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.14075 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1879 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.14076 of 2011),
Civil Appeal Nos. 1880-1881 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) Nos.14077-14078 of 2011),
Civil Appeal Nos. 1882-1883 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) Nos.14079-14080 of 2011),
Civil Appeal Nos. 1884-1885 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) Nos.16937-16938 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1886 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.16821 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1887 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.16822 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1888 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.16823 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1889 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.16824 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1890 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.16825 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1891 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.15474 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1892 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.16968 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1893 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.16969 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1894 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.17643 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1895 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.16505 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1896 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.17645 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1897 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.17644 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1898 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.16695 of 2011)
Civil Appeal No. 1899 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.22460 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1900 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.22180 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1901 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.22446 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1902 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.22449 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1903 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.22447 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1904 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.22772 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1905 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.26556 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1906 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.27677 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1907 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.28775 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1908 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.27044 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1909 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.27048 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1910 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.28776 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1911 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.28067 of 2011),
Civil Appeal No. 1912 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.28607 of 2011)
And
Civil Appeal No. 1913 Of 2012
(Arising out of Slp (C) No.29542 of 2011)
J U D G M E N T
| [
{
"end": 67,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 45
},
{
"end": 262,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 248
},
{
"end": 391,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 357
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
CRL.A.No. 1585 of 2005()
1. Mohanan, S/O.Karithikeyan,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. State Of Kerala,
... Respondent
For Petitioner :Sri.C.K.Sajeev
For Respondent :Public Prosecutor
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.Balakrishnan Nair
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.S.Gopinathan
Dated :16/12/2009
O R D E R
K.Balakrishnan Nair & P.S.Gopinathan, Jj.
= = = = = = = = = = = = =
Crl.Appeal No.1585 of 2005
&
R.C.No. 1 of 2005.
= = = = = = = = == = = = =
Dated this the 16th day of December, 2009.
J U D G M E N T
| [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 79,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 72
},
{
"end": 186,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 171
},
{
"end": 280,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 270
},
{
"end": 377,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 358
},
{
"end": 416,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 402
},
{
"end": 470,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 451
},
{
"end": 487,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 473
}
] |
Case No.:
Appeal (crl.) 486 of 2003
Petitioner:
M. Prabhulal
Respondent:
Assistant Director, Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 62,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 50
},
{
"end": 131,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 76
}
] |
Petitioner:
Commissioner Of Income Tax,Bihar And Orissa, Patna
Vs.
Respondent:
S. P. Jain
Date Of Judgment | [
{
"end": 62,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 92,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 82
}
] |
* 1 * F.A.1081/99 &
F.A. 1428/2002
25.4.2011
In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
First Appeal No. 1081 Of 1999
United India Insurance Co. Ltd .... Appellant
V/S.
1. Smt. Vijaya Harish Bolar & Ors. ..... Respondents
And
First Appeal No. 1428 Of 2002
Smt. Vijaya Harish Bolar & anr.
ig .... Appellants
V/S.
Mohammad Ismail Bhagwan & anr. ..... Respondents
* * * *
Mrs. Anita Agarwal, adv.for the appellant in F.A.1081/1999 & respondent in
1428 of 2002.
Mr. T.J. Mendon, adv.for the respondent in F.A. 1081/1999 & for appellant in
F.A. No. 1428 of 2002.
* * * *
Coram :- Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J.
25th April, 2011. Judgment | [
{
"end": 279,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 245
},
{
"end": 588,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 558
},
{
"end": 752,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 733
},
{
"end": 997,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 978
},
{
"end": 1156,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1133
},
{
"end": 1307,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1294
},
{
"end": 1394,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1383
},
{
"end": 1608,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1590
}
] |
1
In The High Court Of Karnataka At Bangalore
Dated This The 12Th Day Of March 2014
Before
The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice N. Ananda
Criminal Appeal No.1652/2007 C/W
Criminal Appeal No.1726/2007
CRL.A.No.1652/2007
Between:
1. Mapillai K H Sulaiman
S/O Hydros, 45 Years,
Coolie, R/At Anepare
Coffee Estate Line
Kutta Village.
2. M N Venu
S/O Madhavan, 50 Years
Poojekallu, Kutta Village
3. C Subber
S/O Ahamed Kutty, 39 Years, Driver
Nazim Manzil, Keelaloor Village
Panchayath, Yedeyannur Village
Mattanoor Taluk, Kannanoor District
Kerala State
4. K P Azeez
S/O Late Mohammed, 44 Years
Kottarthil House
Yedeyannur Village
Keelaloor Village Panchayat
Mattanoor Taluk, Kannanoor District
Kerala State
5. E K Azeez
S/O Mamuti, 37 Years
2K House, Palur Palli
Mattanoor Taluk ... Appellants
2
(By Sri N Ravindranath Kamath, Advocate)
And:
The State Of Karnataka
By Deputy Superintendent Of Police
C.A.Squad, C.O.D., Bangalore. ... Respondent
(By Sri B Visweswaraiah, Hcgp)
This Appeal Is Filed Under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C.,
Against The Judgment Dated 26.10.2007 In S.C.No.48/2000, On
The File Of The Sessions Judge, Kodagu At Madikeri,
Convicting Appellants-Accused For Offences Punishable
Under Sections 489-B, 489-C And 120-B Ipc & Etc.
CRL.A.No.1726/2007
Between:
Nayar K Vinodh
S/O Kunhiraman, 39 Years
Chakkekekal, Maka Post
Anjaranakandi, Kannanoor District,
Kerala State. ... Appellant
(By Sri N Ravindranath Kamath, Advocate)
And:
The State Of Karnataka
By Deputy Superintendent Of Police
C A Squad, C.O.D., Bangalore. ... Respondent
(By Sri B Visweswaraiah, Hcgp)
This Appeal Is Filed Under Section 374 (2) Cr.P.C.,
Against The Judgment Dated 26.10.2007 Passed By The
District & Sessions Judge, Kodagu At Madikeri In
S.C.No.48/2000, Convicting Appellant/Accused No.3 For
Offences Punishable Under Sections 489-B, 489-C And
120-B Ipc And Etc.
These Appeals Coming On For Final Hearing This
Day, The Court Delivered The Following:
3
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 51,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 15
},
{
"end": 170,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 161
},
{
"end": 307,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 286
},
{
"end": 409,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 401
},
{
"end": 477,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 469
},
{
"end": 653,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 644
},
{
"end": 826,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 817
},
{
"end": 991,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 970
},
{
"end": 1032,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1014
},
{
"end": 1149,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1134
},
{
"end": 1474,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1460
},
{
"end": 1645,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1624
},
{
"end": 1685,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1667
},
{
"end": 1802,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1787
}
] |
In the Court of Pawan Kumar Matto: Additional District Judge 01:
East District : Karkardooma Courts : Delhi.
Suit No. 771/09
Unique Case Id No.02402C0046442014
In The Matter Of :
1. Santosh Garg
w/o late Shri Ram Krishan Garg
r/o 124/6, West Azad Nagar,
Delhi110051.
2. Smt Sarita Gupta
w/o Shri S K Gupta
r/o C68, NiralaNagar,
Lucknow(UP)
3. Smt Vibha Goyal
w/o Shri N K Goyal
r/o H.no.403, Street no.12,
Bhola Nath Nagar,
Shahdara,Delhi32
4. Smt Abha Agarwal
w/o Shri Alok Agarwal
Quarter no.7/2,Type4,
Hvf Estate, Avadi, Chennai .....Plaintiffs.
Versus
1. Ajay Garg
s/o late Shri Ram Krishan Garg
r/o 124/6, Wes Azad Nagar,
Delhi - 110 051.
2. S.Vijay Garg,
s/o late Shri Ram Krishan Garg
r/o 124/6, West Azad Nagar,
Delhi110051. .....Defendants.
S.no: 771/2009 Santosh Garg and another vs Ajay Garg and another 1 of 22
Date of institution : 16.04.2009
Arguments heard on : 31.10.2014
Date of Judgment : 07.11.2014
Judgment | [
{
"end": 34,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 17
},
{
"end": 123,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 36
},
{
"end": 223,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 210
},
{
"end": 346,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 334
},
{
"end": 449,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 438
},
{
"end": 589,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 577
},
{
"end": 795,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 786
},
{
"end": 916,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 904
},
{
"end": 1093,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1081
},
{
"end": 1118,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1109
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
Crl Mc No. 1397 of 2007()
1. Haridas P.Nair, Aged 33 Years,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. State Of Kerala,
... Respondent
2. Station House Officer,
For Petitioner :Sri.K.Ramakumar (Sr.)
For Respondent :Public Prosecutor
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.Ramkumar
Dated :07/04/2008
O R D E R
V. Ramkumar, J.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Crl. M.C. No. 1397 of 2007
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Dated the 7th day of April 2008
Order
| [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 87,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 73
},
{
"end": 191,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 176
},
{
"end": 262,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 241
},
{
"end": 313,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 302
},
{
"end": 407,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 397
},
{
"end": 477,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 466
}
] |
Crr-2597-2014
(Arvind Mishra Vs Dinesh)
09-09-2015
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : At Jabalpur
Criminal Revision No. 2597/2014
Arvind Mishra and three others
Vs.
Dinesh and another
âÃÂæ...........................................................................
......................
Present:- Hon'ble Shri Justice C.V. Sirpurkar
..................................................................................................
.............
Shri Rajneesh Jain, counsel for the applicant.
Shri V.Chouksey, counsel for the respondent No.1.
Shri K.S.Patel, Panel Lawyer for the respondent No.2/State.
.................................................................................................
............
Order
| [
{
"end": 41,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 28
},
{
"end": 51,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 45
},
{
"end": 109,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 67
},
{
"end": 197,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 184
},
{
"end": 306,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 300
},
{
"end": 475,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 461
},
{
"end": 607,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 594
},
{
"end": 651,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 641
},
{
"end": 700,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 691
}
] |
1 wp.2800.2013 J5.5.doc
In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
Writ Petition No. 2800 Of 2015
1] Uran Education Society ]
a Registered Public Charitable Trust, ]
under the provisions of Bombay Public ]
Trust Act, having its Registered Office at ]
Palak Maidan, Bori, Uran, Dist. Raigad, ]
Uran 400 702. ]
2] The Hon. General Secretary, ]
Uran Education Society
ig ]
a Registered Public Charitable Trust, ]
under the provisions of Bombay Public ]
Trust Act, having its Registered Office at ]
Palak Maidan, Bori, Uran, Dist. Raigad, ]
Uran 400 702. ]
3] Unaided Schools Forum, a Society ]
registered under the Societies ]
Registration Act, 1860, which has ]
its registered office at ]
Hiranandani Foundation, 17, ]
Saraswati Road,Santacruz (West), ]
Mumbai, 400 054 and having an ]
office for correspondence at ]
Gujarat Research Society,Dr. ]
Madhuri Shah Campus, R.K. Mission ]
Road, Khar (West), Mumbai - 400 052 ] ... Petitioners
Versus
1] The State of Maharashtra, ]
Through the Secretary, ]
for School Education and Sports ]
Department, having its address ]
Shraddha Talekar Pa 1/33
2 wp.2800.2013 J5.5.doc
at Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032. ]
]
2] The Director of Education (Primary), ]
Maharashtra State, Pune. ]
]
3] Education Officer (Primary) ]
Raigad Zilla Parishad, Alibag ]
]
4] Education Officer ]
Panchayat Samiti, Uran, ]
District Raigad. ]
]
5] Union of India, ]
Ayakar Bhavan,
Opp, Churchgate Station,
]
]
Mumbai - 400 032. ] ... Respondents
Dr.Birendra Saraf a/w. Mr.Piyush Raheja, Mr.Vishesh Malviya, Ms.Nikita
Mishra i/b M/s. Federal & Rashmikant for petitioners.
Mr.Sunil Manohar, Advocate General a/w. Ms.S.S.Bhende, Agp for
respondent no.1-State.
Mr.Anil Singh, A.S.G. a/.w Mr.R.A. Rodrigues, Mr.Rajiv
Chavan,Mr.D.A.Dube, Mr.Ajay Patil, Mr.D.P. Singh and Mr.N.R.Prajapati
for respondent no.4.
Coram : Anoop V. Mohta,
K.R.Shriram, Jj.
Date : 28Th April, 2015 Oral Judgment | [
{
"end": 118,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 84
},
{
"end": 429,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 407
},
{
"end": 1343,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 900
},
{
"end": 1425,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1404
},
{
"end": 2158,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2138
},
{
"end": 2942,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2864
},
{
"end": 3191,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 3103
},
{
"end": 3478,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 3345
},
{
"end": 3650,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 3636
},
{
"end": 4028,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4014
},
{
"end": 4050,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4037
},
{
"end": 4070,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4055
},
{
"end": 4092,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4075
},
{
"end": 4173,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4160
},
{
"end": 4319,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4302
},
{
"end": 4342,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4326
},
{
"end": 4354,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4346
},
{
"end": 4369,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4359
},
{
"end": 4384,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4374
},
{
"end": 4405,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4392
},
{
"end": 4493,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 4479
},
{
"end": 4548,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 4537
}
] |
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Jabalpur
Election Petition No. 02/2007
Sahab Singh Patel
............Petitioner
vs.
Smt. Shashi Prabha
.............Respondent
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri Virendra Verma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri Mrigendra Singh with Shri A. Patel, Advocates for the
respondent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date of Hearing : 29.07.2008
Date of Order : 25.09.2008
Order
| [
{
"end": 39,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 0
},
{
"end": 146,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 129
},
{
"end": 310,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 297
},
{
"end": 505,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 491
},
{
"end": 563,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 548
},
{
"end": 582,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 574
}
] |
1 Cr.A. No.844 /2003
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh At Jabalpur
Division Bench: Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rakesh Saksena
Hon'Ble Shri Justice Subhash Kakade
Criminal Appeal No.844/2003
Appellant: Sukhdeo S/o Anjulal Katiya,
Aged about 35 years,
R/o Dodasemar Koltidhana,
P.S. Nawegaon,
District Chhindwara
Versus
Respondent: The State of Madhya Pradesh
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Appellant : Ku. Savita Chaudhary,
Learned Counsel
For the Respondent/State : Shri Amit Pandey
Learned Panel Lawyer
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date of hearing : 25.04.2013
Date of judgment: 19.06.2013
Per: Subhash Kakade, J.
(J U D G M E N T | [
{
"end": 103,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 63
},
{
"end": 156,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 142
},
{
"end": 208,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 194
},
{
"end": 306,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 299
},
{
"end": 651,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 628
},
{
"end": 823,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 807
},
{
"end": 958,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 947
},
{
"end": 1210,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1196
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
Present:
The Honourable The Ag.Chief Justice Mr.Ashok Bhushan
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.R.Ramachandran Nair
The Honourable Mr.Justice K.Surendra Mohan
The Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai
&
The Honourable Smt. Justice P.V.Asha
Friday,The 20Th Day Of February 2015/1St Phalguna, 1936
WP(C).No. 31599 of 2009 (T)
------------------------------------------
Petitioner(S) :
------------------------
K.L.Francis, Aged 56 Years,
S/O.Laser, Driver (Retd), Ksrtc, Adoor And
Residing At Cheriparambil House, Chayalodam.P.O,
Ezhamkulam Adoor.
By Adv. Sri.N.Unnikrishnan
Respondent(S) :
---------------------------
1. The Kerala State Road Transport Corporation,
Transport Bhavan, Fort, Thiruvananthapuram,
Rep.By Its Managing Director.
2. The Assistant Transport Officer,
Ksrtc, Adoor.
By Adv. Sri.M.Gopikrishnan Nambiar, S.C
This Writ Petition (Civil) Having Been Finally Heard
On 28-01-2015, Along With W.P.(C).No.7910 Of 2012 And Connected
Cases, The Court On 20-02-2015 Delivered The Following:
Msd.
WP(C).No. 31599 of 2009 (T)
------------------------------------------
Appendix
Petitioner(S)' Exhibits
-------------------------------------
Exhibit P1: Atrue Copy Of Certificate Dated 10.03.2008 Issued By A.T.O.
Adoor, The 2Nd Respondent To The Petitioner.
Exhibit P2: A True Copy Of The Page No. One Of Service Book.
Exhibit P3: A True Copy Of The Page No. Six Of Service Book.
Exhibit P4: Atrue Copy Of The Letter Dated G1-2-780/08/Adr
Dated 08.07.2008 Issued By The Ato, Adoor.
Exhibit P5: A True Copy Of Memorandum Of Settlement Dated 13.04.1999.
Exhibit P6: A True Copy Of Representation Dated 12.08.2008 Submitted By
The Petitioner.
Exhibit P7: A True Copy Of Judgment Dated 18.12.2006 In W.A.No.243/06.
Exhibit P8: A True Copy Of Judgment In W.P.(C).No.26795/2008
Dated 16.07.2009.
Exhibit P9: A True Copy Of Personal Hearing Note Dated 10.09.2009.
Exhibit P10: A True Copy Of Letter Dated 11.09.2009.
Exhibit P11: A True Copy Of Order No.Pa.18/003221/08 Dated 14.10.2009.
Respondent(S)' Exhibits
-----------------------------------------
Nil
//True Copy//
P.S.To Judge.
Msd.
(C.R.)
Ashok Bhushan, Ag.CJ,
T.R.Ramachandran Nair, J,
K.Surendra Mohan, J,
A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai, J,
&
P.V.Asha, J
----------------------------------------------
W.P(C).No.31599 of 2009,
W.P(C).No.7910 of 2012,
W.P(C).No.7032 of 2013,
W.P(C).No.7816 of 2013,
W.P(C).No.15379 of 2013
W.A.No.149 of 2010
&
W.A.No. 150 of 2010
----------------------------------------------
Dated this the 20th February, 2015
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 164,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 151
},
{
"end": 230,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 209
},
{
"end": 294,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 278
},
{
"end": 362,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 340
},
{
"end": 482,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 474
},
{
"end": 762,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 751
},
{
"end": 964,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 950
},
{
"end": 1125,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1029
},
{
"end": 1242,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1188
},
{
"end": 1291,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1269
},
{
"end": 3067,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 3046
},
{
"end": 3103,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 3087
},
{
"end": 3143,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 3121
},
{
"end": 3212,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 3204
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
RCRev..No. 276 of 2005()
1. Mrs.Nabeesa Abdul Khader,
... Petitioner
2. Abu Sali Abdul Khader @ Sali,
3. Nazzar, S/O.Do.Do.
4. Sajeev, S/O.Do.Do.
5. Anitha Abdul Khader, D/O.Do.Do.
6. Jeby Abdul Khader, D/O.Do.Do.
7. Jameela, D/O.Do.Do.
8. Azeena, D/O.Do.Do.Do.
9. Sabeena, D/O.Do.Do.
Vs
1. Suresh Kurian, S/O.Joseph Kurian,
... Respondent
2. Aboobacker Abdul Khader,
3. Seli, D/O.Abdul Kahder, Do.Do.
4. Beakutty, Of Do.Do.
For Petitioner :Sri.Rajeev V.Kurup
For Respondent :Smt.Deepthy.S.Nath
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pius C.Kuriakose
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.K.Abdul Rehim
Dated :17/02/2009
O R D E R
Pius.C.Kuriakose & C.K.Abdul Rehim, Jj.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
R.C.R.No.276 Of 2005
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 17th day of February, 2009
Order
| [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 96,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 76
},
{
"end": 167,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 139
},
{
"end": 178,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 172
},
{
"end": 200,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 194
},
{
"end": 235,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 216
},
{
"end": 268,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 251
},
{
"end": 291,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 284
},
{
"end": 313,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 307
},
{
"end": 339,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 332
},
{
"end": 399,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 386
},
{
"end": 491,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 468
},
{
"end": 501,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 497
},
{
"end": 540,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 532
},
{
"end": 604,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 590
},
{
"end": 657,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 643
},
{
"end": 699,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 683
},
{
"end": 739,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 724
},
{
"end": 796,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 780
},
{
"end": 814,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 799
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated: 30/10/2002
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice P. Sathasivam
and
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Gnanaprakasam
Civil Misc.Appeal No. 1603 of 2001
and
C.M.P.No. 21316 of 2001
The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.,
139, Eswaran Koil Street, Pondy. .. Appellant/2nd Respondent.
-Vs-
1. Kaliya Pillai,
2. Thangam ..Respondent 1 and 2/Petitioner 1 and 2.
3. N. Velu.
..Respondent 3/1st respondent.
Appeal against fair and decretal order dated 12-12-2000 made in O.P.No. 171
of 1998 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Sub Court)
Kallakurichi, as sated therein.
!For appellant : Mr. M.S. Krishnan
^For Respondents 1 and 2 : Mr. R. Muralidharan
:Judgment | [
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 106,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 93
},
{
"end": 151,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 135
},
{
"end": 285,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 221
},
{
"end": 351,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 338
},
{
"end": 363,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 356
},
{
"end": 444,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 437
},
{
"end": 741,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 728
},
{
"end": 796,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 781
}
] |
In The Court Of Shri Satvir Singh Lamba, Mm-01
( Negotiable Instruments Act) West District,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
Sh. Aman Vij
Proprietor of M/s Aman Services,
7-8, Mohan Garden,
Main Najafgarh Road,
Uttam Nagar,
New Delhi - 110059. ......Complainant
Vs.
Shri Anand Kumar,
Proprietor of M/s Rahul Trading Company,
B-3, Kushak Road no.2,
Saroop Nagar,
New Delhi - 110042. ........Accused
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 39,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 21
},
{
"end": 156,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 41
},
{
"end": 170,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 162
},
{
"end": 404,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 393
}
] |
The Honble Sri Justice M.S.Ramachandra Rao
W.P.Nos.30790 of 2014 and batch
07-11-2014
Edara Haribabu...petitioner
The District Collector cum Presiding Officer, Prakasam District and others.
...respondents!Counsel for the petitioner in W.P.Nos.30790 and 30791 of 2014: Sri C.V.Mohan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel for Sri M.Karthik Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner.
^Counsel for the for respondent No.1 in W.P.No.30790 of 2014, W.P.No. 30791 of 2014 and W.P.No.30799
of 2014 : Learned Government Pleader for
Panchayat Raj
Counsel for the for respondent No.2: Sri V.V.Prabhakar Rao in all three cases;
Counsel for the for respondent No.3 in W.P.No.30790 of 2014, 30791 of 2014 and for the petitioner in W.P.No.30799 of 2014 : Sri B.V.Subbaiah, learned Senior Counsel for Smt. K.Aruna, learned counsel.
<Gist:
>Head Note:
? Cases referred (2014) 5 S.C.C. 312 2 2002(4) Ald660 3 (2004) 3 Scc 723 4 Air 1967 Sc 295 5 (2000) 8 Scc 82 6 (2003) 6 Scc 675 7 2001(5) Alt 553 (F.B) 8 (2009) 5 Scc 616 9 2010(4) Ald 646 (Db) 10 Air 1967 Sc 1 11 2005 (1) Alt 552 (Db) 12 Air 1975 Sc 1297 13 Air 1978 Sc 949 14 Air 1968 S.C. 13 15(2008) 4 S.C.C. 451 16 (2003) 10 S.C.C. 121 17 (2005) 2 S.C.C. 673 18 2012 (1 Ald 107 (Db) 19 2014 (4) Alt 22 20 Air 2000 S.C. 388 The Hon'Ble Sri Justice M.S.Ramachandra Rao W.P.Nos.30790, 30791 and 30799 of 2014 Common Order | [
{
"end": 42,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 23
},
{
"end": 118,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 104
},
{
"end": 306,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 291
},
{
"end": 354,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 339
},
{
"end": 678,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 661
},
{
"end": 839,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 827
},
{
"end": 880,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 873
},
{
"end": 1396,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1377
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated: 24.01.2012
Coram:
The HonBle Mr. Justice T.S.Sivagnanam
C.R.P.(NPD)No.2308 of 2005
Central Government Employees
Welfare Housing Organization,
Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer,
'A' Wing, 6th Floor, Janpath Bhavan
Janpath, New Delhi 110 001. .. Petitioner
-vs-
1.Consolidated Civil Constructions (I) Ltd.,
Rep. by its Executive Director,
20, Lakshmi Bhavan,
609, Anna Salai
2.Bharath Overseas Bank,
Chennai Main Branch,
Rep. by its Manager,
Karunai Kudil,
226, Cathedral Road, Chennai 86. .. Respondents
Prayer: The above Petition is filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code, against the order dated 22.06.2005, of the learned Vii Assistant Civil Court, Chennai, in O.S.No.1755 of 2004, dismissing the plea of the petitioner to reject the plaint under Order 7, Rule 11, Cpc r/w Section 151 Cpc, due to lack of jurisdiction.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.S.V.Prasad
For Respondents:M/s.Ajay Kumar Gnanam for R1
No Appearance for R2
O R D E R
| [
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 105,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 91
},
{
"end": 295,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 135
},
{
"end": 364,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 321
},
{
"end": 468,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 445
},
{
"end": 959,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 947
},
{
"end": 999,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 982
}
] |
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.60/2012
Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Jodhpur Vs. M/s Jain Construction Co.
1/24
In The High Court Of Judicature For Rajasthan
At Jodhpur
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 97,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 59
},
{
"end": 127,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 106
},
{
"end": 263,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 185
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated: 21/03/2003
Coram
The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice E.Padmanabhan
Writ Petition No.15920 of 1995
Writ Petition Nos. 15922 of 1995, 15983, 15986, 10854, 10862, 10864,
10865, 10875, 10876, 10880, 11238, 11239, 11368, 11369, 11370 ,
11557, 12152, 12921, 13084, 13085, 11410, 11411, 11412, 13364, 13365,
13366, 13373 to 13375, 13382, 13383, 13509, 13573, 13574,
1334, 13335, 16363 to 16366, 16459, 17371, 17372, 17408, 17409,
17410,14139, 14308 to 14310, 15915, 17480, 17504 to 17508,
16861 of 1995 & 3358 of 1996 & 1234, 4636, 1380, and 9685 of 1998
and
W.M.P.Nos:25431, 25433, 25435, 25437, 7436, 7439/97 & 17252/95,
52552 , 52089/2002, 17261, 17265, 17282, 17284, 170288, 17836,
17838/1995, 18045, 18047, 18049, 18351/1995, 19366, 65866/1996,
20701, 20982 20984, 21447, 21455, 21456, 21469, 21661, 21749, 21751,
25991, 25993, 25995, 25997/1995, 11855 to 11858/1997 27495, 27497,
22505, 22766, 22768 , 22770, 25304, 25322, 25324, 25326/1995, 4729,
4730, 4731/97, 5400/96, 20602, 7093/98 and 15379/95.
W.P.No:15920/95
Sri Lakshmi Saraswathi Bus Service
Teachers' Colony, Erode. ..Petitioner
-Vs-
1. The Government of Tamil Nadu
rep. by the Secretary Home
(Tansport Dept.,) Secretariat,
Chennai-9
2. The Regional Transport Authority,
Periyar District., Erode.
3. Jeeva Transport Corporation Ltd.,
rep. by its Managing Director
Chennimalai Road,
Erode 738 002 ..Respondents !For petitioners:
Mr.S.Varadachachi :: WP.Nos:15983 to 15986, 15920 to 15922/95 Mr.M.Krishnappan :: W.P.Nos:10854, 11410, 11411 and 11412/95 Mr.S.C.Palanisamy :: W.P.Nos:10862, 10864, 10865, 10875, 10876, 10880, 13364, 13365, 13366, 13373, 13383, 17480, 13334 , 1335, 13374, 13375, 13382, 17504, 17505, 17506, 17507 and 17508/95 Mrs.S.Radhagopalan :: W.P.Nos:11238,16861 & 11557/95 Mr.R.S.Ramanujam :: W.P.Nos:11368 to 11370, 13084, 17408, 17409 and 17410/95 Mr.N.Gopalakrishnan:: W.P.Nos:12152, 17371, 17372/95 Mr.C.R.Krishnamoorthy W.P.Nos:11239/95, 6114/98, 13573, 13574 , 16459, 14308 to 14310/95 and 6086 of 1998 Mr.K.M.Venugopal :: W.P.Nos:13509/95, 15915/95 Mr.R.Neatesan :: W.P.Nos:16363 to 16366 of 1995 Mr.V.Lakshminarayan:: appearing in person (Wp3358/96) Mr.K.Hariharan :: W.P.Nos:1234, 4636/98 & 9685/95 Ms.P.Vedavalli :: W.P.1380/98 Mr.M.Palani :: for implead petitioners' ^For Respondents: :: In all the Writ Petitions Mr.N.R.Chandran, Advocate General assisted by Mr.Sanjay Ramasami Petitions filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of Certiorari as stated therein.
:C O M M O N O R D E R | [
{
"end": 42,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 8
},
{
"end": 106,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 93
},
{
"end": 1119,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1065
},
{
"end": 1195,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1171
},
{
"end": 1338,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1281
},
{
"end": 1376,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1344
},
{
"end": 1530,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1516
},
{
"end": 1591,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1578
},
{
"end": 1653,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1639
},
{
"end": 1842,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1828
},
{
"end": 1893,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1880
},
{
"end": 1973,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1957
},
{
"end": 2028,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2010
},
{
"end": 2129,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 2116
},
{
"end": 2173,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2163
},
{
"end": 2227,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2211
},
{
"end": 2276,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2265
},
{
"end": 2326,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2315
},
{
"end": 2353,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2345
},
{
"end": 2444,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2432
},
{
"end": 2493,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2478
}
] |
1
In the Court of Dig Vinay Singh
ASJ/Special Judge : Ndps (N-W) : Rohini Courts : Delhi
In the matter of :
Sc No. 57/12
State Vs. Om Prakash & anr.
Fir no. 152/12
Ps Crime Branch
U/s 18 of Ndps Act
State
Versus
1) Om Prakash
S/o Sh. Chuna Ram
R/o Village Jajiwal,
Vishnoiyan, Distt. Jodhpur, Rajasthan
2) Pramod
S/o Late Sh. Om Prakash
R/o Village Buda Khera,
Ps Uklana, Mandi,
Distt. Hisar, Haryana.
Date of receipt : 17.09.2012
Date of arguments : 26.09.2014
Date of announcement : 17.10.2014
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 56,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 41
},
{
"end": 126,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 72
},
{
"end": 269,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 264
},
{
"end": 286,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 276
},
{
"end": 519,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 514
},
{
"end": 578,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 568
},
{
"end": 738,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 732
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
WP(C).No. 25626 of 2009(W)
1. Panachikunnel Annamma Thomas,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. State Of Kerala,
... Respondent
2. Special Tahsildar (L.A.),
For Petitioner :Sri.O.Ramachandran Nambiar
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan
Dated :29/09/2009
O R D E R
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J
...........................................
WP(C).NOs.25626 & 24875 Of 2009
............................................
Dated This The 29Th Day Of September, 2009
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 102,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 74
},
{
"end": 191,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 176
},
{
"end": 258,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 241
},
{
"end": 327,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 305
},
{
"end": 428,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 402
},
{
"end": 501,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 474
}
] |
In the Court of Sh. Vimal Kumar Yadav, Additional Sessions
JudgeII, South District, Saket Court, Delhi.
Session Case No. 71/2013
In the matter of :
State
Versus
1. Afroj Ali,
S/o Sh. Sarjan Ali,
R/o 5/430, Dakshinpuri,
New Delhi.
2. Farhan Ali,
S/o late Gaffar Ali,
R/o 5/430, Dakshinpuri,
New Delhi.
3. Bhagwan @ Dasi,
S/o Sh. Madan Lal,
R/o L240, Dakshinpuri,
New Delhi.
Fir No. : 446/2012.
Police Station : Ambedkar Nagar
Under section. : 307/34 Ipc & 25/54/59 Arms Act.
Date of assignment : 20.04.2013.
Reserved for judgment on : 09.05.2014.
Date of decision : 15.05.2014
State Vs. Afroz Ali etc. 1 of 29
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 37,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 20
},
{
"end": 117,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 39
},
{
"end": 171,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 166
},
{
"end": 195,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 186
},
{
"end": 268,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 258
},
{
"end": 346,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 332
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated: 25.03.2010
Coram:
The Honourable Ms.Justice R.Mala
Crl.A.Nos.1033 to 1048 of 2002
1. G.Nagarajan
2. K.Srinivasan
.. Appellants in Crl.A.No.1033 of 2002
Vs.
State rep. by Deputy Supdt. Of Police,
Vigilance & Anti-Corruption Special Cell,
Salem.
.. Respondent in Crl.A.No.1033 of 2002
Criminal Appeal No.1033 of 2002 against the judgment dated 30.5.2002 in C.C.No.3 of 1996 on the file of the First Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dharmapuri at Krishnagiri.
For appellants in Crl.A.No.1033 of 2002 :
Mr.R.Sankarasubbu
For respondent in Crl.A.No.1033 of 2002:
Mr.I.Paul Noble Devakumar,
Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side).
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 99,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 93
},
{
"end": 145,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 134
},
{
"end": 161,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 149
},
{
"end": 223,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 218
},
{
"end": 638,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 624
},
{
"end": 711,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 689
}
] |
ash 1 crapeal-611.12
In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay
Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction
Criminal Appeal No.611 Of 2012
Sadanand Shivaji Kadam )
Age about 86 years, )
Occupation : Agriculturist, )
R/at Flat No.12, Bharati Apartments, )
Shivajinagar, Pune 411 005. )
(at present in Yerawada Central Prison, )
Pune. ).. Appellant
Vs
State of Maharashtra, )
(Through Haveli Police Station. ).. Respondent
-
Shri V.R. Manohar, Senior Advocate with Shri M.S. Mohite, Shri S.V. Kotwal & Shri Shrikant Shiwade i/by Shri Ashish Sawant and Shri A.R. Kapadnis for the Appellant.
Shri S.M. Gorwadkar for the original Complainant. Shri H.J. Dedhia, App for the State.
-
Coram : Abhay S. Oka &
Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav, Jj
Date : 4Th September, 2012
Oral Judgment | [
{
"end": 150,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 116
},
{
"end": 432,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 410
},
{
"end": 985,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 965
},
{
"end": 1156,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1144
},
{
"end": 1195,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1184
},
{
"end": 1213,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1202
},
{
"end": 1237,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1221
},
{
"end": 1261,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1248
},
{
"end": 1284,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1271
},
{
"end": 1325,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1311
},
{
"end": 1372,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1361
},
{
"end": 1458,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1446
},
{
"end": 1532,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1515
}
] |
* In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi
+ MAC.APP.No.792/2006
Date of Decision : 11th January, 2013
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. ..... Appellant
Through : Mr. Karan Chaudhary, proxy
counsel for Mr. R.N.
Sharma, Adv.
versus
Ranjit Pandey & Ors. .... Respondents
Through : Mr. Idresh Ahmed, Adv. for
R-1
Coram :-
Hon'Ble Mr. Justice J.R. Midha
Order
| [
{
"end": 48,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 16
},
{
"end": 173,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 146
},
{
"end": 353,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 309
},
{
"end": 404,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 391
},
{
"end": 505,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 493
},
{
"end": 597,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 587
}
] |
In The Court Of Ii Addl. City Civil And Sessions
Judge And Special Judge At Bengaluru,
(Cch-17)
Dated this the 1st day of October, 2015
:Present:
M. Chandrashekar Reddy, B.A., Ll.B.,
Ii Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge,
and Special Judge.
Sessions Case No. 1345/2011
Complainant : State by:
Chandra Layout police,
Bengaluru.
(By Ld.Spl. Public Prosecutor)
-Versus-
Accused : 1. Nagesha @ Penne ,
S/o Muniraju,
Aged about 20 years,
R/o No.35/5, Thotada road,
Nayandahalli,
Bengaluru - 39.
2. Madhu @ Madhu
(Juvenile - case is split up)
3. Raghavendra @ Piya,
S/o Muniyappa,
Aged about 26 years,
R/o No.22, Revanna Layout,
Behind Ganesha temple,
Nayandahalli,
Bengaluru - 39.
(A-1 & A-3 in Judicial custody)
2 S.C.No. 1345/2011
(By Smt.N.Padmavathi, Adv for A-1,
Shri. A. Vedamurthy, Adv for A-3)
(A-2 being Juvenile case against
him split up and sent to Juvenile
Justice Board)
1 Date of commission of Intervening night of
offence 31.07.2011 and
01.08.2011
2 Date of report of 01.08.2011
occurrence
3 Date of arrest of Accused 02.08.2011
4 Date of release of ---
Accused on Bail
5 Period undergone in 04 years 1 month 29
custody days
6 Date of commencement 26.07.2012
of recording of evidence
7 Date of closing of 18.10.2014
evidence
8 Name of the Complainant Prosecutrix (P.W.1)
9 Offences Complained of Ss.376(2)(g) and 392 r/w
Sec.34 of Ipc and
Sec.3(1)(x)(xi)(xii) of Sc/St
(Prevention of Atrocities)
Act, 1989.
1 Opinion of the Judge A-1 & A-3 convicted of
0 offences u/s Ss.376(2)(g)
and 392 r/w Sec.34 of Ipc
and Sec.3(1)(xi)(xii)
and acquitted of
Sec.3(1)(x)SC/ST
(Prevention of Atrocities)
Act, 1989
3 S.C.No. 1345/2011
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 119,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 225,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 203
},
{
"end": 387,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 382
},
{
"end": 592,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 577
},
{
"end": 833,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 820
},
{
"end": 933,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 915
},
{
"end": 1357,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1345
},
{
"end": 1418,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1405
}
] |
1
®
In The High Court Of Karnataka At
Bangalore
Dated This The 21st Day Of May, 2013
Before
The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Anand Byrareddy
Criminal Petition No.4104 Of 2009
Connected With
Criminal Petition No.4369 of 2009
Between:
1. M/s. Shree Ganesh Steel Rolling Mills
Limited, represented by its
Director, Mr. Ashok Kumar Saraf,
14-A, Ennore High Road,
Thiruvottiyur,
Chennai - 600 019.
2. Mr. Ashok Kumar Saraf,
Son of D.D. Saraf,
Aged about 46 years,
Director,
M/s. Shree Ganesh Steel Rolling Mills
Limited, 14-A, Ennore High Road,
Thiruvottiyur,
Chennai - 600 019.
3. Mrs. Ruchira Saraf,
Wife of Mr. Ashok Kumar Saraf,
2
Aged about 38 years,
Director,
M/s. Shree Ganesh Steel Rolling Mills
Limited, 14-A, Ennore High Road,
Thiruvottiyur,
Chennai - 600 019. ...Petitioners
Common
(By Shri. G.L. Rawal, Senior Advocate for Shri. K. Sachindra
Karanth, Advocate)
And:
M/s. Stcl Limited
(A Government of India undertaking)
Having their office at No.166/2,
13th Main Road,
Vasanthanagar,
Bangalore - 560 052,
Represented by its Managing Director,
through its Authorised Officer,
Mr. Jagadeesh Kumar,
Manager - Marketing (in-charge). ...Respondent
Common
(By Shri. Chandrashekara .K, Advocate for Shri. Kiran S Javali,
Advocate)
*****
In CRL.P.No.4104 of 2009
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to set aside the order dated
20.07.2009 passed by the Xv Additional Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate, Bangalore, in P.C.R.No.11982 of 2009 now
numbered as C.C.No.16289 of 2009 issuing summons to the
3
petitioners and allow this petition by quashing the entire
proceedings in P.C.R.No.11982/2009 now numbered as
C.C.No. 16289 of 2009 on the file of Xv Additional Chief
Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore.
In CRL.P.No.4369 of 2009
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to set aside the order dated
17.06.2009 passed by the Xv Additional Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate, Bangalore, in C.C.No.13784 of 2009 originally
numbered as P.C.R.No.7831/2009 and issuing summons to the
petitioners
These petitions having been heard and reserved on
19.04.2013 and coming on for pronouncement of orders this
day, the Court delivered the following:-
Order
| [
{
"end": 128,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 71
},
{
"end": 255,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 240
},
{
"end": 454,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 407
},
{
"end": 622,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 605
},
{
"end": 853,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 840
},
{
"end": 1217,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1207
},
{
"end": 1265,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1245
},
{
"end": 1301,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1289
},
{
"end": 1650,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1633
},
{
"end": 1685,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1671
}
] |
In The Court Of Ms. Jyoti Kler, Additional Senior Civil Judge
CumJudge Small Cause CourtCum Guardian Judge, South
East District, Saket Court Complex, New Delhi
Rca No: 05/13
Case Id No. 02406C0139602013
In The Matters Of :
Sh. Bhagwat
S/o Sh. Jaipal,
R/o A66, Near Bharat Ghar,
Garhi, East of Kailash,
New Delhi .....Appellant
Versus
Sh. Vijay Kumar
S/o Sh. Rampal,
R/o 24, Garhi,
East of Kailash,
New Delhi. .....Respondent
Date of Institution: 01.06.2013
Date of Final Arguments: 22.03.2014
Date of Judgment: 09.04.2014
Decision: Partly allowed.
And
Rca No. 03/13
Case Id No. 02406C0108652013
In The Matters Of :
Sh. Vijay Kumar
S/o Sh. Rampal,
R/o 24, Garhi,
Rca No. 05/13 Sh. Bhagwat Vs. Vijay Kumar & Rca No. 03/13 Vijay Kumar Vs. Bhagwat 1/22
East of Kailash,
New Delhi. .....Appellant
Versus
Sh. Bhagwat
S/o Sh. Jaipal,
R/o A66, Near Bharat Ghar
Garhi, East of Kailash,
New Delhi .....Respondent
Date of Institution: 30.04.2013
Date of Final Arguments: 22.03.2014
Date of Judgment: 09.04.2014
Decision: Dismissed.
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 30,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 20
},
{
"end": 178,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 32
},
{
"end": 259,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 252
},
{
"end": 464,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 453
},
{
"end": 1106,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1095
},
{
"end": 1118,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1111
},
{
"end": 1302,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1295
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
WP(C).No. 9508 of 2009(G)
1. Valsala Kumari Devi.M.,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. State Of Kerala, Represented By Its
... Respondent
2. Director Of Higher Secondary Education,
3. Regional Deputy Director,
4. Manager, B.A.R. Higher Secondary School,
5. Principal, B.A.R. Higher Secondary
For Petitioner :Sri.O.V.Radhakrishnan (Sr.)
For Respondent :Smt.P.K.Priya
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.R.Ramachandran Nair
Dated :22/02/2011
O R D E R
T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W.P.(C) No. 9508 of 2009-G
- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 22nd day of February, 2011.
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 95,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 73
},
{
"end": 184,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 169
},
{
"end": 291,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 253
},
{
"end": 321,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 297
},
{
"end": 366,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 327
},
{
"end": 406,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 372
},
{
"end": 462,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 445
},
{
"end": 516,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 507
},
{
"end": 563,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 542
},
{
"end": 639,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 617
}
] |
In The Court Of Shri Puneet Pahwa
Metropolitan Magistrate 01 (N.I. Act)
Patiala House Courts : New Delhi
Sh. Ramesh
S/o Sh. Kishan Lal,
R/o 20281/E, Pillanji,
Kotla Mubarakpur,
New Delhi
....................... Complainant
Vs.
Sh. Mahender Singh @ Mahender Sardar
(Senior Clerk, Steno)
Block No.3, Punjab Cell,
Cgo Complex, Lodhi Road,
New Delhi.
. ................................Accused
Case Number. : 267/1
Date of Institution of Present Case. : 31.05.2004
Offence Complained Of. : U/s 138 Ni Act
Case No. 267/1
Plea of the Accused. : Not Guilty
Arguments Heard On. : 07.03.2014.
Final Order. : Convicted.
Date of Judgment. : 26.03.2014
- :: Judgment | [
{
"end": 33,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 21
},
{
"end": 137,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 47
},
{
"end": 151,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 145
},
{
"end": 394,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 362
}
] |
In The Court Of Sh. Gorakh Nath Pandey
Additional District Judge02 (Ne)
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
Cs No. 243/14
In The Matter Of :
Lokesh Kumar Jain
S/o Sh. R. P. Jain
R/o C8, West Jyoti Nagar,
Delhi 110094. ....... Plaintiff
Versus
(1) Tulsha Devi
W/o Late Sh. Rajesh Kumar Sharma
(2) Gaurav Sharma ( 17 years)
S/o Late Sh. Rajesh Kumar Sharma
(3) Saurabh Sharma (16 years)
S/o Late Sh. Rajesh Kumar Sharma
(4) Kumari Bhawna Sharma (15 years)
D/o Late Sh. Rajesh Kumar Sharma
All minors through their natural mother/
Guardian i.e. addressee No. 1 Smt. Tulsha Devi.
All R/o H. No. 1/ 2091, ( Old No. 603/5D/3L),
Gali No. 21, East Ram Nagar,
Shahdara, Delhi110032 ..... defendants
Cs No. 243/14 1/15
Lokesh Kumar Jain V/s Tulsha Devi
O R D E R
| [
{
"end": 38,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 20
},
{
"end": 136,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 57
},
{
"end": 237,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 220
},
{
"end": 463,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 452
},
{
"end": 539,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 526
},
{
"end": 627,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 613
},
{
"end": 720,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 700
}
] |
In The Court Of Sh. Sunil Rana
Addl. District Judge : 02 (North West)
Rohini Courts: Delhi
Rca No. 104/13.
Unique Id No.02404C0264692013.
K.L.Dhawan
S/o Sh. Devi Dayal Dhawan,
R/o. A56/5 (Back Portion),
Kewal Park Extn., Near Ram
Lila Ground, Delhi33.
........Appellant
Versus
Shuveta Abhichandani
W/o Sh. Dhiraj Abichandani,
R/o. 56/4, Kewal Park Extn.,
Near Ram Lila Ground, Delhi33.
........Respondent Date of Filing : 17.09.2013.
Date of Reserving order : 26.02.2014.
Date of Judgment : 26.02.2014.
Order | [
{
"end": 30,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 20
},
{
"end": 136,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 47
},
{
"end": 212,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 202
},
{
"end": 539,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 519
}
] |
Mohan Tiwari Vs. Satinder Kumar & Ors.
In The Court Of Sh. K S Mohi : Presiding Officer : Mact
South District : Saket Courts : New Delhi
Petition No. : 158/13
Unique case Id : 02406C0125192013
1. Mohan Tiwari ...... Father
S/o Sh. Babu Nandan
2. Indrawati ...... Mother
W/o Sh. Mohan Tiwari
Both R/o H. No. 26, Vill. & P.S. Kotava
Distt. Padrauna, Kushi Nagar, U.P.
..... Petitioners
Versus
1. Satinder Kumar
S/o Sh. Mool Chand
R/o 62K, Humayun Pur village
Ps : Safdarjung Enclave
New Delhi - 110 029 ..... Driver
2. Anil Kumar
S/o Sh. Mukhtiyar Singh
R/o H. No. 502, Vill. Sihi,
Sector8, Ballabgarh, Faridabad
Haryana ..... Owner
3. Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Birla Tower, 5th Floor,
25, Barakhamba Road,
New Delhi ..... Insurer
..... Respondents
Petition No. : 158/13 Page No. 1 of 17
Mohan Tiwari Vs. Satinder Kumar & Ors.
Date of Institution : 08.05.2013
Date of reserving of judgment/order : 28.07.2014
Date of pronouncement : 28.08.2014
J U D G M E N T | [
{
"end": 12,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 0
},
{
"end": 31,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 17
},
{
"end": 80,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 72
},
{
"end": 253,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 241
},
{
"end": 337,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 328
},
{
"end": 657,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 643
},
{
"end": 831,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 821
},
{
"end": 1042,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1002
},
{
"end": 1442,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1430
},
{
"end": 1461,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1447
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 290 of 2002()
1. N.I.Shaju, S/O.N.I.Ippan,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. T.K.Paulose, Thondanala House,
... Respondent
2. State, Represented By The
For Petitioner :Sri.C.P.Udayabhanu
For Respondent :Sri.P.B.Asokan
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.S.Satheesachandran
Dated :17/07/2009
O R D E R
| [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 86,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 77
},
{
"end": 186,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 175
},
{
"end": 259,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 254
},
{
"end": 332,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 318
},
{
"end": 381,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 371
},
{
"end": 427,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 407
}
] |
1
Reserved Judgment
In The High Court Of Uttarakhand At Nainital
Special Appeal No. 14 of 2015
Rajesh Goyal & others. ............ Appellants
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & others. ............. Respondents
Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate, along with Mr. H.M. Bhatia, Advocate for the
appellants.
Mr. Vinay Garg, Advocate, with Mr. Rahul Consul, Advocate for the Mdda.
Mr. Pradeep Joshi, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 121,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 84
},
{
"end": 188,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 176
},
{
"end": 315,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 295
},
{
"end": 384,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 372
},
{
"end": 422,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 411
},
{
"end": 467,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 457
},
{
"end": 500,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 488
},
{
"end": 542,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 529
}
] |
Sh. G. N. Pandey, Additional District Judge2( Ne), Kkd Courts, Delhi
In The Court Of Sh. G. N. Pandey
Additional District Judge02 (Ne)
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
Rca No. 36/14
Case I.D. Number : 02402C0238582010
In The Matter Of :
Amar Singh
S/o Sh. Rattan Singh
R/o Village & P.O. Gokalpur,
Delhi110094. .......Appellant
Versus
(1) Hans Raj
S/o Sh. Ari Singh
Proprietor of Plastic Industry
Village & P.O. Gokalpur, Shahdara,
Delhi110094.
(2) Dharam Pal
S/o Sh. Bishamber
Proprietor of Plastic Dana Factory
(through LRs)
(a) Rajesh Kumar (Son)
S/o Late Dharampal
R/o Village & P. O. Gokalpuri, Shahdara,
Delhi.
(b) Nandoi Kumar ( Son)
S/o Late Dharampal
Rca No. 36/14 1/17
Amar Singh V/s Hansraj & Anr.
Sh. G. N. Pandey, Additional District Judge2( Ne), Kkd Courts, Delhi
R/o Village & P. O. Gokalpuri, Shahdara,
Delhi.
(c) Smt. Brahamwati
W/o Late Dharampal
R/o Village & P. O. Gokalpuri, Shahdara,
Delhi.
(3) Chander Pal
S/o Sh. Ari Singh
Proprietor of Polythene Bags Factory
Village & P. O. Gokalpur, Shahdara,
Delhi110094. ......Respondents
Date of Institution of Appeal:23.08.2010
Received in this Court :10.02.2014
Arguments heard on : 20.09.2014
Date of Judgment/Order : 20.09.2014
Decision : Dismissed with cost.
J U D G M E N T
| [
{
"end": 16,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 4
},
{
"end": 70,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 19
},
{
"end": 134,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 122
},
{
"end": 512,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 502
},
{
"end": 785,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 777
},
{
"end": 984,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 974
},
{
"end": 1133,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1121
},
{
"end": 1290,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1278
},
{
"end": 1450,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1440
},
{
"end": 1462,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1455
},
{
"end": 1505,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1493
},
{
"end": 1677,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1667
},
{
"end": 1828,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1817
}
] |
In the Court of Pawan Kumar Matto
Additional District Judge01 (East)
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
Mca No.17/2013
Unique Case Id No.02402C0305962013
In the matter of :
Sh. Jagat Singh Talwar
S/o late Sh. Sujan Singh
R/o House No.J1/14, Upper Ground Floor,
Krishna Nagar, Delhi110051 ..........Appellant/Plaintiff
Versus
1. Sh. Nirmal Singh Talwar
S/o late Sujan Singh Talwar
2. Smt. Deep Kaur
W/o Sh. Nirmal Singh Talwar
Both R/o House No.C8, Hazara Park,
Chander Nagar, Delhi110051.
3. Sh. Rajesh Jain
Sole Proprietor / Partner
of M/s. J.R.N. Textiles,
One Shop in Property No.IX/6629,
Nehru Gali, Gandhi Nagar,
Delhi110031. .........Respondents/Defendants
Date of institution : 19.09.2013
Arguments heard on : 03.06.2014
Order announced on : 09.06.2014
Mca No.17/2013 Page No.1 of 16
09.06.2014
O R D E R
| [
{
"end": 33,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 16
},
{
"end": 127,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 48
},
{
"end": 224,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 206
},
{
"end": 427,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 408
},
{
"end": 483,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 474
},
{
"end": 617,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 606
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated : 23.8.2006
C O R A M :
The Honourable Mr.A.P.Shah, The Chief Justice
And
The Honourable Mr.Justice K.Chandru
W.P.Nos.18898 of 2000, 19998 of 2001,
24316 of 2002 and 17646 of 2006
&
W.M.P.Nos.27383 and 27384 of 2000,
29477 and 29478 of 2001, 33424 and
33425 of 2002 and MP.Nos.1, 2 and 3 of 2006
W.P.NOs.18898 of 2000, 19998 of 2001
and 24316 of 2002:
Consumer Action Group rep.by its
Trustee Tara Murali,
No.7, 4th Street, Venkateswara Nagar,
Adyar, Chennai-600 020. ... Appellant
-vs-
1. The State of Tamil Nadu rep.by its
Secretary to Government,
Law Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.
2. The State of Tamil Nadu rep.by its
Secretary to Government,
Housing and Urban Development
Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.
3. The Chennai Metropolitan Development
Authority, rep.by its Member-Secretary,
Thalamuthu Natarajan Malegai,
Egmore, Chennai-600 008. ...Respondents
Wp.17646 Of 2006:
K.R.Ramaswamy @ Traffic Ramaswamy ... Petitioner
-vs-
1. State rep.by the Secretary,
Municipal Administration,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.
2. The Member Secretary,
Chennai Metropolitan Development
Authority, Gandhi Irwin Road,
Egmore, Chennai-600 008.
3. The Commissioner,
Corporation of Chennai,
Ripon Building,
Chennai-600 003.
4. The Commissioner of Police,
Greater Chennai City,
Egmore, Chennai-8.
5. The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
800, Anna Salai, Chennai-2.
6. The Chairman,
Chennai Metropolitan Water supply
and sewerage Board, Pumping
Station Road, Chennai-2. ... Respondents
(Respondents 5 and 6 impleaded
suo motu as per the order of
this court, dated 21.7.2006)
Prayer in Wp.18898 of 2000: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of declaration declaring (a) Section 113-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act,1971 as amended by the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Amendment Ordinance, 2000 (Ordinance 7 of 2000) ultra vires Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India; and (b) The provisions of the Application, Assessment and Collection of Regularisation Fee (Chennai Metropolitan Area) Rules, 1999 as ultra vires Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India; and pass such further orders.
Prayer in Wp.19998 of 2001: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for the issuance of a writ of declaration declaring (a) Section 113-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 as amended by the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Amendment Ordinance, 2001 (Ordinance 5 of 2001) ultra vires Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and (b) The provisions of the Application, Assessment and Collection of Regularisation Fee (Chennai Metropolitan Area) Rules, 1999 as ultra vires Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India; and pass such further orders.
Prayer in Wp.24316 of 2002: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for the issuance of a writ of declaration declaring (a) Section 113-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 as amended by the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Amendment Act, 2002 (Act 7 of 2002) ultra vires Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and (b) The provisions of the Application, Assessment and Collection of Regularisation Fee (Chennai Metropolitan Area) Rules, 1999 as ultra vires Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India; and pass such further orders.
Prayer In Wp.17646 Of 2006 : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondents 2, 3 and 4 to enforce the provisions on the Tamil Nadu Multi-storeyed Building Act and Rules, 1973 and City Municipal Act, 1919 in respect of building in the city of Chennai to ensure the public safety and effective free flow of Traffic and pass such further orders.
For petitioner in Wp.
Nos.18898 of 2000,
9998 of 2001 and
24316 of 2002 :: Mr. Sriram Panchu, Sc for
Mr.T.Mohan
For petitioner in Wp.
No.17646 of 2006 :: Mr.Elephant G.Rajendran
For respondents :: Mr.R.Viduthalai, Advocate General
assisted by Mr.Raja Kalifulla, Gp
for State
assisted by Mr.J.Ravindran,
for Cmda, Tneb and Cmwssb
assisted by Mr.L.N.Praghasham,
for Chennai Corporation.
*********
Common Order | [
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 101,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 93
},
{
"end": 160,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 151
},
{
"end": 427,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 406
},
{
"end": 578,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 559
},
{
"end": 699,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 680
},
{
"end": 969,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 831
},
{
"end": 1101,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1096
},
{
"end": 1357,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1235
},
{
"end": 1456,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1369
},
{
"end": 1543,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1468
},
{
"end": 1636,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1556
},
{
"end": 1766,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1649
},
{
"end": 4243,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4230
},
{
"end": 4339,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4319
},
{
"end": 4377,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4365
},
{
"end": 4435,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4421
},
{
"end": 4500,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4489
},
{
"end": 4573,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4559
}
] |
Sbcwp No.10833/2010 - M/s R.P.Bricks Industries vs. State & Ors. &
other connected matters
Judgment dt:26/4/2013
1/106
In The High Court Of Judicature For Rajasthan At
Jodhpur
Order
| [
{
"end": 47,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 26
},
{
"end": 57,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 52
},
{
"end": 375,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 295
}
] |
1
The High Court Of Meghalaya
Wp(C) No. 276 of 2013
1. Shri Banshanbor Thangkhiew,
S/o (L) Din Singh Dkhar,
R/o Mawlai Nongpdeng,
Shillong, East Khasi Hills District,
Meghalaya.
... Petitioner
-Versus-
1. The State of Meghalaya
Represented by the Secretary
(Revenue Department),
Shillong.
2. The Deputy Commissioner/Collector,
Ri-Bhoi District,
Meghalaya.
3. The Extra Assistant Commissioner
(Incharge - Revenue),
Ri-Bhoi District,
Meghalaya.
4. The Union of India,
Defence Ministry,
Represented by Defence Estate Officer,
Silpukhuri, Guwahati,
Assam.
....Respondents Before The Hon'Ble Mr Justice T Nandakumar Singh For the petitioner : Mr. E.Nongbri, Adv.
For the respondents : Ms. N.G.Shylla, Ga.
Mr. R.Deb Nath,CGC.
Date of hearing : 04-06-2015
Date of Judgment : 03-07-2015
Judgment | [
{
"end": 38,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 15
},
{
"end": 113,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 92
},
{
"end": 364,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 346
},
{
"end": 525,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 455
},
{
"end": 634,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 538
},
{
"end": 661,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 647
},
{
"end": 883,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 865
},
{
"end": 918,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 909
},
{
"end": 964,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 954
},
{
"end": 987,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 977
}
] |
In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi
Cs(Os) 1417/2009 & Ia 9891/2009
Reserved on : 12th August 2009
Decision on : 18th August 2009
M/S Oval Investment Pvt Ltd & Ors ..... Plaintiffs
Through Mr. C.A. Sundram, Senior Advocate and
Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Manish Sharma & Ms. Rohini Musa, Advocates
versus
M/S Indiabulls Financial Services
Ltd & Ors ..... Defendants
Through Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Senior Advocate and
Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Mr. Mahesh Agarwal and
Mr. Akshay Ringe, Advocate for Defendant No.1.
Ms. Neelima Tripathi, Advocate for
Defendant Nos. 2 to 19.
Coram:
Hon'Ble Dr. Justice S. Muralidhar
1.Whether reporters of the local news papers
be allowed to see the judgment? No
2.To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 39,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 250,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 227
},
{
"end": 323,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 311
},
{
"end": 376,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 363
},
{
"end": 430,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 417
},
{
"end": 448,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 437
},
{
"end": 530,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 497
},
{
"end": 626,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 613
},
{
"end": 677,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 666
},
{
"end": 732,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 718
},
{
"end": 752,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 738
},
{
"end": 787,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 775
},
{
"end": 852,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 836
},
{
"end": 960,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 947
}
] |
1
In The Court Of Ms. Illa Rawat : Addl. Sessions Judge
(NorthWest)01, Rohini : Delhi
(Sessions Case No. 63/12)
Unique Id case No. 02404R0119022012
State Vs. Sandeep @ Amit
Fir No. : 77/2012
U/s : 323/365/376/506 Ipc
P.S. : Sultanpuri
State Vs. Sandeep @ Amit
s/o Sh. Devtan Din
r/o C6/30, Sultanpuri
Delhi.
Date of institution of case 02.05.2012
Date on which, judgment has been reserved 17.02.2014
Date of pronouncement of judgment - 20.02.2014
Judgment | [
{
"end": 44,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 34
},
{
"end": 132,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 48
},
{
"end": 207,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 202
},
{
"end": 237,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 223
},
{
"end": 354,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 349
},
{
"end": 403,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 389
}
] |
In The Court Of Xlv Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge,
Bengaluru City (Cch-46)
Present: Sri Suresh .K., B.Sc., Ll.B.,
Xlv Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge.
Dated This The 19Th Day Of October 2015
S.C. No. 86/2009
Between:
The State Of Karnataka
By Basaveshwara Nagara Police
Bengaluru. .. Complainant
And
1. Srinivasa
S/O Govindaiah
Aged 31 Years
2. Shobha
D/O Govindaiah
Aged 29 Years
Accused Nos.1 And 2 Are
R/At Avaragere Village
Amruthur Hobli
Kunigal Taluk
Tumakuru District.
3. Rangaswamy
S/O Rangaiah
Aged 46 Years
4. Lakshmamma
W/O Rangaswamy
Aged 35 Years
2 Cr.Misc.86/2009
Accused Nos.3 And 4 Are
R/At No.16, 1St Main, 1St Cross
Next To Basavanna Temle
Kamalanagar
Bengaluru - 560 079. .. Accused
Date of offence 23-06-2008
Date of report of offence 23-06-2008
Date of arrest of the accused 24-06-2008 (A1)
Date of release on bail 04-06-2009 (A1)
Total period of custody 11 Months 10 Days (A1)
Name of the complainant Smt.Varalakshmi /
Dr.G.Ramesh
Date of commencement of 02-11-2009
recording of evidence
Date of closing of evidence 26-02-2014
Offences complained of 498A, 306, 304B of I.P.C.
Opinion of the Judge Accused found not guilty
State represented by Learned Public Prosecutor
Accused defended by Shri.K.B.K.Swamy, Advocate
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 93,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 16
},
{
"end": 128,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 118
},
{
"end": 324,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 306
},
{
"end": 437,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 428
},
{
"end": 492,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 486
},
{
"end": 677,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 667
},
{
"end": 734,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 724
},
{
"end": 1694,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1683
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated: 17/04/2006
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice N.Paul Vasanthakumar
Writ Petition No.4421 of 2006
W.P.M.P.No.4736 of 2006
1. N.S.Balasubramanian
2. Koshy Kuruvilla
3. A.R.Subramanian
4. B.Balasubramania Iyer
5. V.Marimuthu
6. E.Selvanayagam
7. T.R.Jaya Lakshmi
8. Siva Shanmugham
9. C.R.narayana Pillai
10. V.Prakasham
11. C.P.Sukumar
12. K.Chandra
13. D.Uma Devi
14. M.Papaiah Naidu
15. S.Meenakshi Sundaram
16. N.Sundaram
17. P.R.Anantha Raman
18. V.Chellian
19. P.M.Rudramani ... Petitioners
-Vs-
1. Food Corporation
of India,
rep.by the Chairman and Managing Director,
Headquarters, 16-20, Barakhama Lane,
New Delhi 110 001.
2. The Executive Director (South)
Food Corporation of India Zonal Office,
No.3, Haddows Road, Chennai 600 006.
3. The General Manager,
Food Corporation of India,
Regional Officer, Greams Road,
Chennai 600 006. ... Respondents
This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of
India, for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to extend
the benefits arising from the judgment of the Honourable Kerala High Court in
O.P.No.13651 of 2001 dated 20.10.2003 and confirmed by the Division Bench of
the Honourable Kerala High Court in W.A.No.293 of 2004 as well as by the
Honourable Supreme Court in S.L.P. No.20319 of 2005 to the petitioners
herein, who are identically situated by stepping up of the petitioners' pay on
par with that of their junior Rajan C.Abraham, with effect from 2.1.1993 with
all the consequential benefits including arrears of pay etc.
!For Petitioner : Mr.Vijay Narayan, Sr.Counsel
for Mr.R.Parthiban
^For 1st Respondent : Mr.R.Muthukumaraswamy
Addl. Advocate General
for Mr.P.D.Audikesavalu
:O R D E R | [
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 125,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 105
},
{
"end": 218,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 199
},
{
"end": 242,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 227
},
{
"end": 266,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 251
},
{
"end": 296,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 275
},
{
"end": 316,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 305
},
{
"end": 339,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 325
},
{
"end": 364,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 348
},
{
"end": 388,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 373
},
{
"end": 417,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 398
},
{
"end": 437,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 426
},
{
"end": 458,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 447
},
{
"end": 476,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 467
},
{
"end": 495,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 485
},
{
"end": 519,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 504
},
{
"end": 548,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 528
},
{
"end": 569,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 559
},
{
"end": 595,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 578
},
{
"end": 615,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 605
},
{
"end": 637,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 624
},
{
"end": 731,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 698
},
{
"end": 988,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 870
},
{
"end": 1124,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1003
},
{
"end": 1919,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1906
},
{
"end": 1982,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1971
},
{
"end": 2037,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2019
},
{
"end": 2150,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2134
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
Crl.MC.No. 702 of 2011()
1. Mehaboob, Aged 43 Years, S/O. Koya
... Petitioner
Vs
1. The State, Rep. By The City Traffic
... Respondent
For Petitioner :Sri.Nirmal. S
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Thomas P.Joseph
Dated :30/03/2011
O R D E R
'Cr'
Thomas P Joseph, J.
----------------------------------------
Crl.M.C.No.702 of 2011
---------------------------------------
Dated this 30th day of March, 2011
Order
| [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 80,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 72
},
{
"end": 188,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 183
},
{
"end": 303,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 297
},
{
"end": 396,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 381
},
{
"end": 533,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 518
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated: 02.01.2007
Coram
The Honourable Mr.Justice P.D.Dinakaran
And
The Honourable Mrs.Justice Chitra Venkataraman
Tax Case Reference Nos.87 to 94 of 2001
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Coimbatore. ..Applicant in
all T.Cs.
Vs.
M/s. Sakthi Finance Ltd.
Coimbatore. ..Respondent in
all T.Cs.
For Applicant :: Mr.T.Ravikumar
For Respondent :: Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan
Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act,
1961 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench,
Chennai in R.A. Nos.253 to 260/Mds/97 in I.T.A.
Nos.3260/Mds/90, 1996/Mds/91, 2175/Mds/95, 2174/Mds/93,
1573/Mds/96, 1574/Mds/96, 1338/Mds/96 and 2586/Mds/92 for
the assessment years 1987-88, 1988-89, 1990-91, 1991-92,
1992-93, 1993-94 and 1989-90.
J U D G M E N T
| [
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 169,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 156
},
{
"end": 256,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 237
},
{
"end": 353,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 316
},
{
"end": 548,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 529
},
{
"end": 706,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 695
},
{
"end": 752,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 736
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
Crl.MC.No. 4160 of 2009()
1. Perumapallipad Payyuril Hydru Haji,
... Petitioner
2. Perumapallipad Payyuril Fasalu,
3. Perumapallippad Payyuril Anwar,
Vs
1. The State Of Kerala, Represented By
... Respondent
2. Royal Hospital (P) Ltd.,
For Petitioner :Sri.C.P.Mohammed Nias
For Respondent :Sri.Millu Dandapani
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.Sasidharan Nambiar
Dated :24/11/2010
O R D E R
M.Sasidharan Nambiar, J.
--------------------------
Crl.M.C.No.4160 of 2009
--------------------------
Order
| [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 107,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 73
},
{
"end": 180,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 150
},
{
"end": 215,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 185
},
{
"end": 270,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 255
},
{
"end": 358,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 335
},
{
"end": 415,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 398
},
{
"end": 469,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 454
},
{
"end": 515,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 495
},
{
"end": 581,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 561
}
] |
The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi
% Judgment delivered on: 10.01.2013
+ W.P.(C) 14562/2006
Ntpc Ltd ... Petitioner
versus
Dcit & Others ... Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner : Mr S. E. Dastur, Sr Advocate with
Mr Muralidhar, Ms Bindu Saxena, Ms Aparajita
Swarup, Ms Neha Khattar and Mr K. K. Patra
For the Respondents : Ms Prem Lata Bansal, Sr Advocate with
Mr Ruchir Bhatia
Coram:-
Hon'Ble Mr Justice Badar Durrez Ahmed
Hon'Ble Ms Justice Veena Birbal
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 36,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 4
},
{
"end": 147,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 139
},
{
"end": 269,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 265
},
{
"end": 425,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 413
},
{
"end": 486,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 476
},
{
"end": 503,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 491
},
{
"end": 553,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 508
},
{
"end": 570,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 558
},
{
"end": 589,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 578
},
{
"end": 638,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 622
},
{
"end": 702,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 689
},
{
"end": 748,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 730
},
{
"end": 780,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 768
}
] |
In The Court Of Shri Raj Kumar: Addl. District
Judge17 (Central) : Tis Hazari Courts : Delhi
Suit No. 107/14 (Old Suit no. 239/10/04)
Unique Case Id No. 02401C0024942004
Avinash Chandra Jain,
S/o Late Shri Areh Dass Jain,
R/o 103, Pushpanjali,
Vikas Marg Extension,
Delhi. ........... Plaintiff.
Versus
Ravi Chand Jain (since deceased)
Through legal heirs :
1. Smt. Trishla Jain,
Widow of Sh. Ravi Chand Jain,
2. Sh. Kapil Jain,
S/o Late Sh. Ravi Chand Jain,
3. Sh. Vikas Jain,
S/o Late Sh. Ravi Chand Jain,
All R/o 1st & 2nd Floor of front portion
of H. No. 451012, 7/33, Darya Ganj,
Ansari Road, New Delhi110002 ......... Defendants.
Date of institution of the suit : 10.08.2004
Date on which order was reserved: 13.02.2014
Date of decision : 01.03.2014
Suit No. 107/14 (Old Suit No. 239/10/04) Page No. 1/51
Suit For Possession, Recovery Of Mesne Profits &
Injunction
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 30,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 21
},
{
"end": 99,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 32
},
{
"end": 208,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 188
},
{
"end": 451,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 436
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
WP(C).No. 30948 of 2009(Q)
1. Dr. Preceline George @ Antony Preceline
... Petitioner
Vs
1. State Of Kerala Represented By The Chief
... Respondent
2. Bency.N.L, (Treesa Bency) Aged 26 Years,
For Petitioner :Sri.Santhan V.Nair
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.Sasidharan Nambiar
Dated :07/01/2010
O R D E R
M.Sasidharan Nambiar,J.
===========================
W.P.(C)No. 30948 Of 2009
===========================
Dated this the 7th day of January,2010
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 113,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 78
},
{
"end": 201,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 186
},
{
"end": 284,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 275
},
{
"end": 368,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 354
},
{
"end": 463,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 443
},
{
"end": 528,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 508
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
OP.No. 27937 of 2001(A)
1. Forum For Social Justice
... Petitioner
Vs
1. State Of Kerala
... Respondent
For Petitioner :Sri.R.Surendran
For Respondent :Government Pleader
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.Siri Jagan
Dated :07/09/2009
O R D E R
S. Siri Jagan, J
...............................................
O.P.No. 27937 of 2001
.................................................
Dated this the 7th day of September, 2009
J U D G M E N T
| [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 96,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 72
},
{
"end": 182,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 167
},
{
"end": 276,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 265
},
{
"end": 367,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 355
},
{
"end": 440,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 427
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated: 11/04/2002
Coram
The Honourable Mr. Justice V.S. Sirpurkar
and
The Honourable Mr. Justice Malai Subramanian
and
The Honourable Mr. Justice A. Packiaraj
H.C.P. No.1633 of 2001 and H.C.P.No. 1152 Of 2001
Hidaya Banu :: Petitioner in Hcp 1633/2001
Mohamed Razick @
Ponnambalam :: Petitioner in Hcp 1152/2001
:versus:
1. State of Tamil Nadu
rep. by Secretary to Govt.
Public (Sc) Department
Fort St. George
Chennai – 600 009 :: R1 in both the HCPs
2. State of Tamil Nadu
rep. by Secretary to Govt.
Public (L & O) Department
Fort St. George
Chennai – 600 009 :: R2 in Hcp 1152/2001
3. Union of India, rep. by
Secretary to Government
Ministry of Finance R2 in Hcp 1633/2001
New Delhi – 1 :: R3 in Hcp 1152/2001
4. The Superintendent
Central Prison
Chennai :: R3 in Hcp 1633/2001
Petitions under Art.226 of the Constitution
for a Writ of Habeas Corpus as stated in the petitions
!For Petitioners :: Mr. Habibullah Basha, S.C.
For Mr. M.M. Abdul Huck
(in Hcp No.1633 of 2001)
Mr. C.T. Subbiah
(in Hcp No.1152 of 2001)
^For Respondents :: Mr. I. Subramanian,
Public Prosecutor for R1 & R3
Mr. K. Raviananthapadmanabhan
A.C.G.S.C. For R2 in
H.C.P.No.1633 of 2001
Mr. Su. Srinivasan,
A.C.G.S.C. for R3 in
H.C.P. No.1152 of 2001
:Order | [
{
"end": 48,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 9
},
{
"end": 119,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 104
},
{
"end": 169,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 152
},
{
"end": 215,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 202
},
{
"end": 281,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 270
},
{
"end": 368,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 340
},
{
"end": 478,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 459
},
{
"end": 638,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 619
},
{
"end": 796,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 782
},
{
"end": 1002,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 957
},
{
"end": 1203,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1187
},
{
"end": 1255,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1239
},
{
"end": 1337,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1325
},
{
"end": 1423,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1409
},
{
"end": 1527,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1502
},
{
"end": 1654,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1640
}
] |
1
In The High Court Of Karnataka At Bangalore
Dated This The 22Nd Day Of March, 2013
Before
The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar
Miscellaneous First Appeal No. 4363/2009(Mv)
C/W
Miscellaneous First Appeal No. 609/2009
M.F.A.4363/2009
Between:
1. Smt.Saramma,
Aged About 45 Years,
2. Abubacker Siddique,
Aged 26 Years,
3. Mumtaz,
Aged 22 Years,
4. Issac,
Aged 21 Years,
5. Kairunnisa,
Aged 17 Years,
6. Saifunnisa,
Aged 16 Years,
(Appellant Nos.5 & 6 Are Minors
And Represented By Their Next
Friend Mother-Appellant No.1
As Guardian)
Appellant No.1 Is The Wife And
2
Appellant No.2 To 6 Are The
Childeren Of K.M.Mohmmed And
All Are Residing At Morankala House,
Nelljady Village & Post,
Puttur Taluk, D.K.
...Appellants
(By Sri.Pundikai Ishwara Bhat, Adv.)
And:
1. D.Jagadish, Major,
S/O Dore Swamy Naidu,
No.625, 80, Pete Road,
2Nd Block, Dr.Rajkumar Road,
Bangalore-10.
2. United India Insurance Co.Ltd.,
B.O.No.89, 11Th Cross,
Sampige Road,
Malleshwaram,
Bangalore,
Reptd. By Its Manager.
3. Mohammed Basheer,
Major,
S/O Abdul Rahiman
Badria Cross Road,
Bunder, Mangalore, D.K.
4. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.,
Rama Bhavan Complex,
Kodialbail,
Mangalore,
Rep. By Its Manager.
5. The Divisional Manager,
National Insurance Co. Ltd.,
Divisional Office,
Bharath Building,
P.M.Rao Road,
3
Mangalore ...Respondents
(By Sri.P.B.Raju, Adv. For R2;
Sri.R.Rajagopalan, Adv. For R4;
Sri.A.Ravi Shankar, Adv. For R5;
Notice To R1 And R3 Held Sufficient
V/O Dated 1.2.13)
This Mfa Is Filed U/S.173(1) Of Mv Act Against
The Judgment And Award Dated 17.10.2008 Passed
In Mvc No.1657/1999 On The File Of The Member,
Mact, Puttur, D.K, Partly Allowing The Claim
Petition For Compensation And Seeking
Enchancement Of Compensation.
M.F.A.609/2009
Between:
The Divisional Manager,
National Insurance Company Limited,
Divisional Office,
Bharath Building,
P.M.Rao Road,
Mangalore.
Represented By:
The Regional Manager,
National Insurance Co. Ltd.,
Regional Office,
Shubharam Complex,
144, M.G.Road,
Bangalore,
By Its Manager.
...Appellant
(By Sri.A.Ravishankar, Adv.)
And:
4
1. Smt.Saramma,
Aged About 45 Years,
W/O Late K.M.Mohammed,
2. Abubacker Siddique,
Aged About 26 Years,
S/O Late K.M.Mohammed.
3. Mumtaz,
Aged About 22 Years,
D/O Late K.M.Mohammed.
4. Issac,
Aged About 21 Years,
S/O Late K.M.Mohammed.
5. Kairunnisa,
Aged About 18 Years,
D/O Late K.M.Mohammed.
6. Saifunnisa,
Aged About 17 Years,
D/O Late K.M.Mohammed.
Minor Represented By Her Natural
Guardian Mother
Smt.Saramma, Claimant No.1
7. Khatizamma,
Aged About 74 Years,
W/O Late K.N.Sulaiman,
Dead By Lr'S Of Respondents 1-6
8. D.Jagadish,
S/O Dore Swamy Naidu,
Aged About 45 Years,
No.625, 80, Pete Road,
2Nd Block, Dr.Rajkumar Road,
Bangalore-10.
9. United India Insurance Co.Ltd.,
B.O.No.89, 11Th Cross,
5
Sampige Road,
Malleshwaram,
Bangalore,
Reptd. By Its Manager.
10. Mohammed Basheer,
Aged About 48 Years,
S/O Abdul Rahiman
Badria Cross Road,
Bunder, Mangalore.
11. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.,
Rama Bhavan Complex,
Kodialbail,
Mangalore0560010.
...Respondents
(By Sri.Pundikai Ishwar Bhat, Adv. For R1 - R6;
Sri.P.B.Raju, Adv. For R9;
Sri.R.Rajagopalan, Adv. For R11;
R1 To R6 Are Treated As Lr'S Of R7;
Service Of Notice To R8 And R10 Held
Sufficient V/O Dated 1.2.13)
This Mfa Is Filed U/S.173(1) Of Mv Act Against
The Judgment And Award Dated 17.10.2008 Passed
In Mvc No.1657/1999 On The File Of The Member,
Mact, Puttur, D.K, Awarding A Compensation Of
Rs.3,11,732/- With Interest At 6% P.A Fromj
20.08.2005 Till Deposit.
These MFAs Coming On For Final Hearing This
Day, The Court Delivered The Following:
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 54,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 18
},
{
"end": 180,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 167
},
{
"end": 360,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 353
},
{
"end": 416,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 398
},
{
"end": 454,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 448
},
{
"end": 491,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 486
},
{
"end": 533,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 523
},
{
"end": 575,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 565
},
{
"end": 993,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 972
},
{
"end": 1025,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1015
},
{
"end": 1188,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1158
},
{
"end": 1334,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1318
},
{
"end": 1472,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1444
},
{
"end": 1757,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1579
},
{
"end": 1817,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1809
},
{
"end": 1856,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1843
},
{
"end": 1896,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1882
},
{
"end": 2401,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2285
},
{
"end": 2625,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2612
},
{
"end": 2687,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2680
},
{
"end": 2834,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2828
},
{
"end": 2901,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2896
},
{
"end": 2973,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2963
},
{
"end": 3045,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 3035
},
{
"end": 3194,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 3184
},
{
"end": 3303,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 3293
},
{
"end": 3475,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 3445
},
{
"end": 3650,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 3634
},
{
"end": 3792,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 3764
},
{
"end": 3943,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3923
},
{
"end": 3980,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3972
},
{
"end": 4017,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4004
}
] |
ITXA523.13.doc
In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay
Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction
Income Tax Appeal No. 523 Of 2013
Commissioner of Income-Tax Ii, Thane, ]
6th floor, B Wing, Ashar I.T. Park Road, ]
16Z, Wagle Estate, Thane 401 604 ] ... Appellant
Versus
Continental Warehousing Corporation ]
(Nhava Sheva) Ltd., D.No.1088, ]
Khopta Village, Tal. Uran, Dist. Raigad, ] ... Respondent
ig With
Income Tax Appeal No. 1969 Of 2013
Commissioner of Income-Tax. Central-IV, ]
Room No.663, 6th Floor, Aayakar Bhawan, ]
M.K.Road, Mumbai - 400 020 ] ... Appellant
Versus
All Cargo Global Logistics Ltd., ]
th
5 floor, Diamond Square, Cst Road, ]
Kalina, Santacruz (East), Mumbai-400 098. ] ... Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellants in Itxa Nos. 523 of 2013.
Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Appellants in Itxa No. 1969/2013.
Mr. S.E. Dastur, senior counsel with Mr. B.V. Jhaveri and Mr. Madhur
Agarwal for the Respondents in Itxa No. 1969/2013.
Srp 1/61
ITXA523.13.doc
Mr. Nishit Gandhi i/b Mr. Vipul Joshi for the Respondents in Itxa
No. 523 of 2013.
Coram : S.C. Dharmadhikari &
A.K. Menon, Jj.
Tuesday, 21St April, 2015 Oral Judgment | [
{
"end": 70,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 36
},
{
"end": 588,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 394
},
{
"end": 793,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 758
},
{
"end": 1360,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1238
},
{
"end": 1466,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1435
},
{
"end": 1633,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1621
},
{
"end": 1706,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1694
},
{
"end": 1771,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1760
},
{
"end": 1809,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1797
},
{
"end": 1838,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1818
},
{
"end": 2259,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2246
},
{
"end": 2279,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2268
},
{
"end": 2589,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 2579
}
] |
In The Court Of Sh. Ravinder SinghIi, Metropolitan
Magistrate (Ni) Act - 07
Dwarka Courts, New Delhi.
Case No. : 4853/14
Unique Case Id No: 02405R0189612011
Sumit Katyal
R/o D1/65
Janakpuri, New Delhi110046 ........................... Complainant
Vs.
1 Rajeev Kapoor
R/o D130, 6th Floor, Rohit Apartment
Sector10, Dwarka, New Delhi 110075
Also At: C/o Avdesh Kapoor/Sanjeev Kapoor
C4E, Janakpuri, New Delhi 110058
2 Priya Kapoor
R/o D130, 6th Floor, Rohit Apartment
Sector10, Dwarka, New Delhi 110075.......................... Accused
Date of Institution: 03.06.2011
Plea of the accused persons: Pleaded Not Guilty
Date of Reserving Judgment: 03/06/2014
Date of Judgment: 31/07/2014
Sentence/final Order: Accused No. 1 Convicted
Accused No. 2 Acquitted
Judgment
| [
{
"end": 37,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 20
},
{
"end": 158,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 39
},
{
"end": 251,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 239
},
{
"end": 425,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 412
},
{
"end": 648,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 636
}
] |
1 WPlodg1718-12
In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay
Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction
Writ Petition (Lodging) No.1718 Of 2012
Susme Builders Private Limited
a company incorporated under the
provisions of the Companies Act, 1956,
and having its registered office at Unit No.F-1
1st floor, Shanti Nagar Industrial Estate Ltd.,
Vakola, Santacruz (East), Mumbai 400 055 ... Petitioner
Versus
1. Chief Executive Officer
Slum Rehabilitation Authority
having his office at Anant Kanekar Marg,
Bandra East, Mumbai 400 050.
2. High Power Committee
having its office at Anant Kanekar Marg,
Bandra East, Mumbai 400 050.
3. Om Namo Sujalam Sufalam Co-operative
Housing Society, a Society registered
under the provisions of the Maharashtra
Co-operative Societies Act, 1960,
Having its registered office at Shivaji
Nagar Shree Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj
Marg, Vakola Bridge, Santacruz (E)
Mumbai 400 055. ... Respondents 2 WPlodg1718-12 Mr.Aspi Chinoy, Senior advocate with Mr.Pradeep Sancheti, Senior advocate, Mr Aniruddha Joshi, Mr.Rohan Cama, Mr. H.A.Thakore i/by M/s Thakore Jariwala Asso., for petitioner Mr.Ravi Kadam, Senior advocate with Mr.G.D.Uttangale and Mr.B.V.Phadnis i/b Uttangale & Co., for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr.P.K.Samdani, Senior advocate with Snehal Shah, Mr.Naushad Engineer & Ms Dipti Panda i/by Narayan & Narayan, for respondent No.3. Mr.V.R.Dhond, Senior advocate i/b. Rakesh Agarwal, for the Intervenors.
Coram : Mohit S. Shah, C.J. & N.M. Jamdar J.
Judgment | [
{
"end": 110,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 76
},
{
"end": 401,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 371
},
{
"end": 1000,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 848
},
{
"end": 1135,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 1026
},
{
"end": 1214,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1152
},
{
"end": 1598,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1587
},
{
"end": 1640,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1624
},
{
"end": 1677,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1662
},
{
"end": 1692,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1682
},
{
"end": 1709,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1698
},
{
"end": 1771,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1761
},
{
"end": 1810,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1797
},
{
"end": 1829,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1818
},
{
"end": 1894,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1883
},
{
"end": 1949,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1933
},
{
"end": 1966,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1955
},
{
"end": 2024,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2015
},
{
"end": 2061,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2047
},
{
"end": 2108,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 2095
},
{
"end": 2128,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 2117
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
CRL.A.No. 1504 of 2004()
1. Palraj @ Appukuttan, S/O.Thankayyan,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. State Of Kerala, Rep. By The
... Respondent
For Petitioner :Sri.P.Vijaya Bhanu
For Respondent :Public Prosecutor
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.Balakrishnan Nair
The Hon'ble Mrs. Justice M.C.Hari Rani
Dated :11/06/2008
O R D E R
| [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 91,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 72
},
{
"end": 196,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 181
},
{
"end": 306,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 292
},
{
"end": 403,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 384
},
{
"end": 442,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 429
}
] |