text
stringlengths 14
24k
| entities
listlengths 0
68
|
|---|---|
In The High Court Of Judicature At Patna
Criminal Appeal (Db) No.418 of 2008
(Against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 14.02.2008
passed by Additional Sessions Judge Xi, Patna in Sessions Trial No. 976 of
1999)
===========================================================
Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav, son of Sri Chandra Narayan Prasad, resident of Court Station Road, P.S. K. Hat Purnea, district Purnea, Bihar, presently lodged at Jail No.3, Central Jail, Tihar, New Delhi .... .... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar through the C.B.I.
.... .... Respondent/s With Criminal Appeal (Db) No. 240 of 2008 =========================================================== Anil Kumar Yadav, son of Hari Yadav, resident of mohalla Moranga, police station Moranga (K. Hat), district Purnea .... .... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar through the C.B.I .... .... Respondent/s With Criminal Appeal (Db) No. 361 of 2008 =========================================================== Rajan Tiwary, son of Vishwa Jeevan Tripathy, resident of village Sahgaura, P.S. Gagaha in the town and district of Gorakhpur (Uttar Pradesh) .... .... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar through the C.B.I .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
(In Cr. App (Db) No. 418 of 2008) For the Appellant/s : M/s. Shrikant V. Bhat, Rakesh Kumar Singh, Ravi Sharma, Rajesh Ranjan, J. John, Ajit Kumar Ojha, Nutan Mishra, Pandey Sanjay Sahay, Advocates.
(In Cr. App (Db) No. 240 of 2008) For the Appellant/s : M/s. Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate, Ajeet Ojha, Nutan Mishra, Advocate.
(In Cr. App (Db) No. 361 of 2008) For the Appellant/s : M/s. Surendra Singh, Sr. Advocate, Dr. Abhishek Priyadarshi, Advocate (For C.B.I. in all appeals) : M/s. Rakesh Kumar Khanna, Sr. Advocate (Additional Solicitor General of India for C.B.I), Harsh Prabhakar, Anando Mukherjee, Bipin Kumar Sinha (Standing Counsel for C.B.I.), Prabhu Narayan Sharma, Sunil Patna High Court Cr. App (Db) No.418 of 2008 dt.17-05-2013 2 Kumar Ravi, Shashi Shekhar Kumar Prasad, Advocates. (For P.W. 9 in all appeals) : M/s. Jitendra Singh, Sr. Advocate, Soni Shrivastava, Amit Prakash, Ravi Bhardwaj, Amit Pawan, Advocates.
=========================================================== Coram: Honourable Mr. Justice V.N. Sinha And Honourable Mr. Justice Amaresh Kumar Lal C.A.V. Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 344,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 317
},
{
"end": 566,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 552
},
{
"end": 730,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 714
},
{
"end": 876,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 862
},
{
"end": 1032,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1020
},
{
"end": 1208,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1194
},
{
"end": 1400,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1384
},
{
"end": 1420,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1402
},
{
"end": 1433,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1422
},
{
"end": 1448,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1435
},
{
"end": 1457,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1450
},
{
"end": 1474,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1459
},
{
"end": 1488,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1476
},
{
"end": 1509,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1490
},
{
"end": 1600,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1585
},
{
"end": 1626,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1616
},
{
"end": 1640,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1628
},
{
"end": 1729,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1715
},
{
"end": 1769,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1749
},
{
"end": 1834,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1815
},
{
"end": 1915,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1900
},
{
"end": 1933,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1917
},
{
"end": 1952,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1935
},
{
"end": 2005,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1984
},
{
"end": 2029,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 2007
},
{
"end": 2084,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 2072
},
{
"end": 2113,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2086
},
{
"end": 2175,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2161
},
{
"end": 2207,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2191
},
{
"end": 2221,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2209
},
{
"end": 2236,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2223
},
{
"end": 2248,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2238
},
{
"end": 2364,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 2354
},
{
"end": 2409,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 2392
}
] |
Petitioner:
Kiran Singh And Others
Vs.
Respondent:
Chaman Paswan And Others.
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 23,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 67,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 54
}
] |
Petitioner:
S.P. Sampath Kumar Etc.
Vs.
Respondent:
Union Of India & Ors.
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 30,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 69,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 55
}
] |
Fir No. 176/2000
P.S.: Chandni Mahal
U/S: 379/411/34 Ipc
In The Court Of Sh. Sidharth Mathur: Metropolitan
Magistrate : Central - 02, Delhi
State Vs. Mohd. Imran & Ors.
Fir No: 176/2000
P.S. : Chandni Mahal
Date of institution of case : 08.11.2000
Date on which case reserved : 05.05.2009
for judgment
Date of judgment : 05.05.2009
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 224,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 209
},
{
"end": 290,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 227
},
{
"end": 295,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 290
},
{
"end": 311,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 300
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated: 04.03.2011
Coram:
The Honourable Mr.Justice Vinod K.Sharma
W.P.Nos.15699, 15818, 15819 of 2008, 22912, 22913,
28122 to 28133, 28314 to 28321, 28917 to 28922 of 2010
1. T.Chakrapani
2. T.Govindarajalu Naidu,
3. Elumalai Achari
4. V.Chidambaram
5. K.Velayudam
6. K.Saravanan
7. Ranganayagi .. Petitioners in W.P.No.15699 of 2008.
Vs.
1. Union of India,
Rep. by Secretary
National Highways Department,
New Delhi.
2. The Secretary to Government,
Government of India,
Ministry of Shipping (Road Transport and Highways),
New Delhi
3. National Highways Authority of India,
Rep. by its Project Director,
In Charge of Nh4
Trivallur District,
Tamil Nadu
4. The District Collector,
(Arbitrator Tiruvallur District)
Tamil Nadu.
5. The Competent Authority (L.A),
Nh-4, Viding for Nerkundram Village,
Poonamallee,
Tiruvallur District,
Chennai 600 056.
6. Special Tahsildar (L.A),
Nh4, Poonamallee,
Tiruvallur District,
Tamil Nadu .. Respondents in W.P.No.15699 of 2008.
Writ petition in W.P.No.15699 of 2008 is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of a Wit of Declaration, declaring the provisions of The National Highways Act, 1956 amended Act No.16 of 1997 herein referred to as the Highways Act are as illegal, null and void, unconstitutional and opposed to the public policy of our country and to invoke the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
For Petitioners : Mr.David Tyagaraj,
(in W.P.Nos.15699, 15818 & 15819/2008)
Mr.T.V.Ramanujam, Sc
For Mr.T.V.Krishnamurthy
(in W.P.Nos.22912 & 22913/10)
Mr.K.Venkatasubba Raju
(in W.P.Nos.28122 to 28133/2010, 28314 to 28321/2010 and 28917 to 28922/2010)
For Respondents : Mr.P.Wilson
Addl. Advocate General
For M/s. P.Wilson Associates,
For The Project Director, Nhai, Salem
Mr.M.Ravindran,
Assisted by M/s.P.Bhuvaneshwari, Scgc
Mr.M.Dhandapani,
Spl.Govt.Pleader for Iii respondent
Assisted by Mr.B.Vijay, Govt. Advocate
*****
C O M M O N O R D E R
|
[
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 110,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 96
},
{
"end": 234,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 222
},
{
"end": 259,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 238
},
{
"end": 279,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 264
},
{
"end": 296,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 283
},
{
"end": 311,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 300
},
{
"end": 326,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 315
},
{
"end": 341,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 330
},
{
"end": 413,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 399
},
{
"end": 604,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 490
},
{
"end": 645,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 609
},
{
"end": 804,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 738
},
{
"end": 934,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 814
},
{
"end": 1016,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 939
},
{
"end": 1519,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1505
},
{
"end": 1590,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1577
},
{
"end": 1625,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1608
},
{
"end": 1691,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1672
},
{
"end": 1817,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1809
},
{
"end": 1947,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1936
},
{
"end": 2015,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2003
},
{
"end": 2087,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2080
}
] |
In The Court Of Shri Rajeev Bansal,
Asj-03 (South District), Saket Courts,
New Delhi.
Sc No.: 74/10
(Unique I.D. No. 02403R0839472008)
Fir No. : 455/08
Ps: Malviya Nagar.
U/S: 393/397 r/w 511, 398/506/120-B/
186/353/307/34 of Ipc & 25 of Arms Act.
The State
Versus
Madan
S/o Sh. Govind
R/o C-95/B, Punjabi Basti,
Baljeet Nagar, New Delhi.
Date of Initial Institution : 31.08.2008.
Date of Institution in the Present Court : 01.10.2010.
Date of Pronouncement of Order : 28.07.2014.
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 34,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 21
},
{
"end": 120,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 47
},
{
"end": 542,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 537
},
{
"end": 565,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 560
}
] |
Petitioner:
Muncipal Corporation For Greater Bombay
Vs.
Respondent:
Lala Pancham Of Bombay & Others
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 51,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 102,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 71
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated : 28-2-2014
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice V.Ramasubramanian
Writ Petition No.61 of 2009
and
M.P.Nos.2 and 3 of 2009
D.Narayanasamy .. Petitioner
Vs
1.The District Collector,
Collectorate,
Tiruvarur.
2.The District Educational Officer,
Deo Office,
Thiruvarur.
3.The Head Master,
Government Higher Secondary School,
Pulivalam,
Thiruvarur District.
4.The Assistant Manager,
Oil Natural and Gas Commission,
Niravi, Karaikkal,
Pondicherry Union. .. Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents as jointly to pay a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- to the petitioner as compensation.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Vijendran
For Respondents-1 to 3 : Mr.R.Ravichandran,
Additional Government Pleader.
For Respondent-4 : Mr.K.Shanmuga Kani
O R D E R
|
[
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 114,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 97
},
{
"end": 187,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 173
},
{
"end": 297,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 248
},
{
"end": 364,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 306
},
{
"end": 461,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 373
},
{
"end": 566,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 470
},
{
"end": 859,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 848
},
{
"end": 905,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 891
},
{
"end": 986,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 971
}
] |
1
Appeals595.02+3
In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay
Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction
Criminal Appeal No. 595 Of 2002
Ramesh Rajmal Jain ... Appellant/Ori.
Accused No.11
v/s
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
ig Along With
Criminal Appeal No. 647 Of 2002
Mangilal Modilal Dave ... Appellant/Ori.
Accused No.12
v/s
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Along With
Criminal Appeal No. 908 Of 2002
Namdeo Sardar Shinde ... Appellant/Ori.
Accused No.2.
v/s
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Along With
Criminal Appeal No. 998 Of 2002
Sahebrao Gulab Kale ... Appellant/Ori.
Accused No.1
V/s
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr.Ganesh Gole, Advocate for the appellant in Criminal
Appeal Nos.908 of 2002 and 998 of 2002.
2
Appeals595.02+3
Mr.I.A.Bagaria, Advocate for the appellant in Criminal Appeal
No.595 of 2002.
Mrs.Anjali Patil, Advocate for the appellant in Criminal
Appeal No.647 of 2002.
Mr.H.J.Dedhia, A.P.P. for the State.
Coram: B. H. Marlapalle &
U. D. Salvi, Jj.
Reserved On : March 18, 2011
Pronounced On : April 15, 2011
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 180,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 146
},
{
"end": 389,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 371
},
{
"end": 527,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 507
},
{
"end": 700,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 679
},
{
"end": 855,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 835
},
{
"end": 1007,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 987
},
{
"end": 1148,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1128
},
{
"end": 1287,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1268
},
{
"end": 1423,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1403
},
{
"end": 1470,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1459
},
{
"end": 1726,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1715
},
{
"end": 1891,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1879
},
{
"end": 2029,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2019
},
{
"end": 2153,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 2137
},
{
"end": 2202,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 2191
}
] |
:1:
In The Court Of Ms. Preeti Agrawal Gupta:
Judge: Mact (North): Rohini: Delhi
Unique Case Id No. 02404Co17712010.
Suit No. 263/13
1. Mst. Salman S/o Sh. Liyakat Ali
2. Afsana D/o Sh. Liyakat Ali
3. Master Imran S/o Sh. Liyakat Ali
4. Master Shahan Ali Khan S/o Sh. Liyakat Ali
5. Master Shahan Baz S/o Sh. Liyakat Ali
These abovenamed five minors petitioner through their elder
brother/guardian who is petitioner no. 6
6. Sharfaraj S/o Sh. Liyakat Ali
7. Shabana D/o Sh. Liyakat Ali
8. Shahana Khatoon D/o Sh. Liyakat Ali
All R/o D1079, J.J.Colony, Bawana, Delhi39.
....Petitioners
Versus
1. Abdul Tauwab S/o Abdul Hai
R/o D1160, Block J.J.Colony ,
Bawana, Delhi39
2. Liyaqat Ali S/o Abdul Shakur
R/o 1079, D Block, J.J.Colony,
Bawana, Delhi39.
3. M/s United India Insurance Company Ltd.
Do24501 5th floor, Kailash Building, 26,
Kg Marg, New Delhi.
....RespondentsDATE Of Institution : 04.05.2010
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 54,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 34
},
{
"end": 104,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 76
},
{
"end": 178,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 172
},
{
"end": 211,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 205
},
{
"end": 251,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 239
},
{
"end": 300,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 278
},
{
"end": 344,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 327
},
{
"end": 494,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 485
},
{
"end": 528,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 521
},
{
"end": 570,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 555
},
{
"end": 771,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 759
},
{
"end": 862,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 851
},
{
"end": 984,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 949
}
] |
1 Wp No. 883/2015
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh,
Bench At Gwalior.
Sb : Justice Sujoy Paul
Writ Petition No. 883 / 2015
Mahendra Gupta and another
Vs.
State of M.P. and others.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri H.D. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Shri R.D. Sharma, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Shri K.N. Gupta, Sr, Advocate with Shri Mansingh Jadon,
Advocate for the respondent No.3.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order
|
[
{
"end": 133,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 60
},
{
"end": 188,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 178
},
{
"end": 281,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 267
},
{
"end": 370,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 357
},
{
"end": 487,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 477
},
{
"end": 523,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 512
},
{
"end": 570,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 560
},
{
"end": 609,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 595
}
] |
Reportable
In The Supreme Court Of India
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
Civil Appeal No. 5239 Of 2002
Dalip Singh ...Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and others ...Respondents
Order
|
[
{
"end": 61,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 39
},
{
"end": 177,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 166
},
{
"end": 292,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 279
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated: 16/12/2002
Coram
The Honourable Mr.Justice M.Karpagavinayagam
And
The Honourable Mr.Justice P.Thangavel
Crl.A. No. 810 Of 1998
1.Thavaraj Pandian
2.Palani
3.Raja
4.Packianathan ..Appellants
-Vs-
State, rep. by
Inspector of Police,
G-1, Thilagar Thidal
Police Station (Crime),
George Town (North),
Madurai. ..Respondent
Criminal Appeal against the judgment dated 12-8-1998 in S.C. No.307
of 1994 on the file of the Principal Sessions Court, Madurai.
!For appellants 1 and 2: Mr. N.Ramu
For appellants 3 and 4: Mr. V.Gopinath,
Senior Counsel for
Ms.N.S.Nappinai
^For respondent : Mr. E.Raja, Addl.P.P.
:Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 113,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 95
},
{
"end": 155,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 144
},
{
"end": 200,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 182
},
{
"end": 209,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 201
},
{
"end": 216,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 210
},
{
"end": 231,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 217
},
{
"end": 290,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 285
},
{
"end": 629,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 623
},
{
"end": 670,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 660
},
{
"end": 754,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 742
},
{
"end": 786,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 780
}
] |
Petitioner:
Aghnoo Nagesia
Vs.
Respondent:
State Of Bihar
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 26,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 60,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 46
}
] |
Balkrishan Sharma vs. Abdul Salam
In The Court Of Sh. Sunil Beniwal, Additional Chief
Metropolitan Magistrate (Shahdara), Kkd Courts Delhi.
C.C. No.08/2013
P.S. Anand Vihar
U/S 138 Negotiable Instruments Act
Sh. Balkrishan Sharma ............. Complainant
vs.
Sh. Abdul Salam ............. Accused
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 17,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 0
},
{
"end": 33,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 22
},
{
"end": 73,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 60
},
{
"end": 145,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 75
},
{
"end": 394,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 377
},
{
"end": 495,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 484
}
] |
1 Ori.Sms.2029.11
Srp
In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay
Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiciton
Originating Summons No. 2029 Of 2011
In
Suit No. 2964 Of 2011
Charu K. Mehta ... Plaintiff
Vs
1. Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust & Ors. ... Defendants
Mr. J.P. Cama, senior counsel with Mr. Raj Patel, Mr. Karl Tamboly,
Mr. Rizvi Nasir Ali and Mr. H.N. Thakore i/b Thakore Jariwalla &
Associates for the Plaintiff.
Mr. Dinyar Madon, senior counsel with Mr. Pranaya Goyal, Ms. Payal
Shah i/b Wadia Ghandy & Co. for the Defendant Nos.1, 8 and 9.
Ms. Rajni Iyer, senior counsel i/b Vna Legal for the Defendant No.2.
Mr. Prateek Sakseria with Ms. Jyoti Shah, Ms. Jesal Shah i/b Daru
Shah & Co. for the Defendant No.3.
Mr. Iqbal Chagla, senior counsel with Mr. Dhirendra Sinha i/b Vidhi
Partners for the Defendant Nos.5, 6, 7 and 11.
Mr. Kevic Setalwad, senior counsel with Mr. Dakshesh Vyas, Ms.
Sushma Nagraj and Mr. Nagendra Dube i/b Lex Firms for the
Defendant Nos. 12, 14 & 15.
Dr. Poornima Advani, Mr. Himanshu Kode, Mr. Omprakash Jha i/b
Law Point for the Defendant No.10.
Mr. Pranav Badheka i/b Parag Sharma for the Defendant Nos.13 & 16.
2 Ori.Sms.2029.11
Coram: S.J. Vazifdar, J.
Date of Reserving : Thursday, 9Th February, 2012.
Date of Pronouncement : Monday, 5Th March, 2012.
Oral Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 111,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 77
},
{
"end": 461,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 447
},
{
"end": 630,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 593
},
{
"end": 747,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 738
},
{
"end": 782,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 773
},
{
"end": 800,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 788
},
{
"end": 827,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 812
},
{
"end": 848,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 836
},
{
"end": 958,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 946
},
{
"end": 997,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 984
},
{
"end": 1019,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1003
},
{
"end": 1108,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1098
},
{
"end": 1198,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1182
},
{
"end": 1218,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1208
},
{
"end": 1234,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1224
},
{
"end": 1312,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1300
},
{
"end": 1353,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1338
},
{
"end": 1442,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1428
},
{
"end": 1481,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1468
},
{
"end": 1506,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1493
},
{
"end": 1528,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1515
},
{
"end": 1616,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1601
},
{
"end": 1635,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1622
},
{
"end": 1654,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1641
},
{
"end": 1725,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1711
},
{
"end": 1969,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1956
}
] |
Before The Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court
Dated: 09/02/2010
Coram
The Honourable Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian
And
The Honourable Mr. Justice D.Hariparanthaman
W.P.(MD)No.4412 of 2008
And
W.P.M.P.(Md) Nos.1 and 2 of 2008
T.Sekaran .. Petitioner
vs
1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Represented by its Home Secretary,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
Secretariat,
St. George Fort,
Chennai-600 009.
2.The District Collector,
Madurai District,
Madurai-625 020.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Madurai District,
Madurai-625 020.
4.The Additional Director General of Prisons,
Anna Salai,
Chennai-600 002. .. Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to
pay a just and reasonable amount as compensation to the bereaved family of
Mr.Canicius Fernando, a Sri Lankan who was shot dead by the outside Security
Warder Ii T.Devaraj, No.126 of Madurai Central Prison on 5.10.2007 in front of
the Central Prison Madurai at 3.15 P.M., in the light of the decision in
Chairman, Railway Board vs. Chandrima Das {2000 (2) Scc 465}, directing the
respondents to take stern action against the Warder Ii T.Devaraj, No.126 for the
heinous crime he has committed against Mr.Canicius Fernando and directing the
respondents to prosecute him in accordance with law and directing the
respondents to take serious steps to inculcate in the Prison Staff and other
prison officials the culture of human values and the sense of human rights and
to eradicate anti-social, corruptive practices prevalent in the prisons all
other Tamil Nadu.
!For Petitioner ... Mr.P.Rathinam
^For Respondents ... Mr.S.Ramasamy,
Additional Advocate General,
Assisted by Mr.A.Edwin Prabhakar,
Additional Government Pleader.
:Order
|
[
{
"end": 45,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 11
},
{
"end": 117,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 99
},
{
"end": 166,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 149
},
{
"end": 239,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 230
},
{
"end": 289,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 270
},
{
"end": 480,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 421
},
{
"end": 556,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 489
},
{
"end": 638,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 565
},
{
"end": 1707,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1697
},
{
"end": 1748,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1738
},
{
"end": 1823,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1806
}
] |
Petitioner:
M.V. Elisabeth And Ors.
Vs.
Respondent:
Harwan Investment And Trading Pvt. Ltd., Hanoekarhouse, Swat
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 26,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 94,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 55
}
] |
Petitioner:
R.K. Garg Etc. Etc.
Vs.
Respondent:
Union Of India & Ors. Etc.
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 21,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 65,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 51
}
] |
In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi
W.P.(C) 6129/2007
Reserved on: 12th March 2010
Decision on: 14th May 2010
Krishak Bharti Cooperative Ltd. ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate
versus
Ramesh Chander Bawa ..... Respondent
in person
W.P.(C) 7787/2008
National Agricultural Cooperative
Federation Of India Ltd. ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. V.P. Singh, Sr. Advocate
with Ms. Anju Bhattarcharya, Mr. Om
Prakash and Mr. M.I. Chaudhary, Ms.
Maninder Acharya, Advocates.
versus
B.M. Verma ..... Respondent
Mr. Brahm Dutt with
Mr. Deepak Pandey, Advocates
W.P.(C) 7770/2008
National Cooperative Consumer
Federation Of India Ltd. ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. V.P. Singh, Sr. Advocate
with Ms. Anju Bhattarcharya, Mr. Om
Prakash and Mr. M.I. Chaudhary,
Advocates.
versus
Raj Mangal Prasad ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Brahm Dutt with
Mr. Deepak Pandey, Advocates
W.P.(C) Nos. 6129/2007, 7787/2008 & 7770/2008 Page 1 of 47
Coram: Justice S. Muralidhar
1. Whether reporters of local paper may be allowed
to see the judgment? Yes
2. To be referred to the report or not? Yes
3. Whether the judgment should be referred in the digest? Yes
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 39,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 256,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 225
},
{
"end": 324,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 314
},
{
"end": 386,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 367
},
{
"end": 620,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 562
},
{
"end": 693,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 683
},
{
"end": 753,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 735
},
{
"end": 787,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 759
},
{
"end": 810,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 796
},
{
"end": 850,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 834
},
{
"end": 906,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 896
},
{
"end": 1014,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1004
},
{
"end": 1069,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1056
},
{
"end": 1189,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1135
},
{
"end": 1262,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1252
},
{
"end": 1322,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1304
},
{
"end": 1356,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1328
},
{
"end": 1379,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1365
},
{
"end": 1460,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1443
},
{
"end": 1539,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1529
},
{
"end": 1579,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1566
},
{
"end": 1694,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1681
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Patna
Miscellaneous Appeal No.453 of 2012
===========================================================
1. The United India Insurance Company Limited, Through Divisional Manager, Divisional Office Ramanuj Bhawan, A.P. Colony, Near Asha Singh More, Gaya, At & P.O.- Gaya, P.S.- Rampur, Distt.- Gaya Apeal And Appellant Through The Manager & Constituted Attorney, Regional Office, United India Insurance Company Limited, Chanakya Commercial Complex, 'R' Block, Patna .... .... Appellant/s Versus
1. Biltan Sao @ Biltan Prasad S/O Lt. Gopali Sao R/O Mohalla- Manpur, Sudhi Tola, P.O.- Buniyadaganj, P.S.- Mufassil, Distt.- Gaya
2. Ahima Devi @ Ahilya Devi W/O Biltan Sao R/O Mohalla- Manpur, Sudhi Tola, P.O.- Buniyadaganj, P.S.- Mufassil, Distt.- Gaya
3. Sri Kali Yadav S/O Lt. Punit Yadav R/O Village- Kukiyasin, P.O.- Bigubigha, P.S.- Buniyadganj, Distt.- Gaya
4. The Branch Manager, Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank, Buniyadganj, Gaya .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Durgesh Kumar Singh For Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. Rajen Sahay, Mr. Anil kumar Saxena, Advocates.
For Respondent no.3 : Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Advocate. =========================================================== Coram: Honourable Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey Cav Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 204,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 166
},
{
"end": 578,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 552
},
{
"end": 707,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 683
},
{
"end": 822,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 808
},
{
"end": 982,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 923
},
{
"end": 1124,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1105
},
{
"end": 1168,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1157
},
{
"end": 1191,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1174
},
{
"end": 1250,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1232
},
{
"end": 1366,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1352
}
] |
Petitioner:
Income Tax Officer
Vs.
Respondent:
M.K. Mohammed Kunhi
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 30,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 69,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 50
}
] |
Case No.:
Writ Petition (civil) 496 of 2002
Petitioner:
Salem Advocate Bar Association,Tamil Nadu
Respondent:
Union of India
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 99,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 58
},
{
"end": 127,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 113
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
Crl Mc No. 9610 of 2002
1. John Idiculla,
... Petitioner
2. Glory John @ Glory Samuel,
Vs
1. State Of Kerala,
... Respondent
2. Valsamma John,
For Petitioner :Sri.K.Ramakumar
For Respondent :Public Prosecutor
The Hon'ble Mrs. Justice K.Hema
Dated : 23/05/2005
O R D E R
|
[
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 84,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 71
},
{
"end": 152,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 127
},
{
"end": 202,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 187
},
{
"end": 264,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 251
},
{
"end": 315,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 304
},
{
"end": 399,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 393
}
] |
In The Court Of The Vi Addl.City Civil & Sessions Judge
Bengaluru City
Ccch. 11
Dated this the 14th day of October, 2015
Present: Smt.Kalpana M.Kulkarni, B.A.,LL.B.,(Spl.)
Vi Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge,
Bengaluru City.
A.S.No: 44/2010
Applicants/ : 1) M/S.Karnataka State
Plaintiff Construction Corporation Limited
Nirman Bhavan, 80 Feet Road
Rajajinagar, Bangalore-560 010.
Reptd.by its Managing Director-
Sri.K.Balakrishna, S/o.Sri.Kempaiah.
2) The Managing Director
Karnataka State Construction
Corporation Limited,
Dr.Rajkumar Road, I Block,
Rajajinagar, Bangalore-560 010.
/Vs/
Respondents/ : 1) Sri.J.Chengama Naidu,
Defendants S/o.Sri.Rama Naidu,
Contractor,
R/at No.36, College Road,
K.R.Layout, 6th Phase, J.P.Nagar,
Bangalore-560 075.
2) Hon'Ble Mr.Justice K.A.SWAMI(Retd.)
Arbitrator,
Former Chief Justice,
Madras High Court.
--
2 A.S.No.44/2010
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 90,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 212,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 194
},
{
"end": 394,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 377
},
{
"end": 897,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 688
},
{
"end": 978,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 962
},
{
"end": 1250,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1236
}
] |
Case No.:
Appeal (crl.) 664 of 2002
Petitioner:
S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Respondent:
Neeta Bhalla and anr.
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 77,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 50
},
{
"end": 105,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 93
}
] |
Petitioner:
Precision Steel And Engineering Works And Anoteer
Vs.
Respondent:
Prem Deva Niranjan Deva Tayal
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 49,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 110,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 81
}
] |
Petitioner:
State Of Haryana And Ors.
Vs.
Respondent:
Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors.
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 28,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 71,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 59
}
] |
1
Kambli
In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
Writ Petition No.6403 Of 2010
...
Smt.Shireen Sami Gadiali and another ...Petitioners v/s.
Spenta Co.op.Hsg.Soc.Ltd.
and others ...Respondents
With
Writ Petition No.7293 Of 2010
...
Shri Vasantrao Madhavrao Deshmane
and ors. ...Petitioners
v/s.
The Asst.Registrar,
co.operative Societies,
Chandwad and others ...Respondents
...
Mr.D.S.Joshi for Petitioners in Wp No.6403 of 2010.
Mr.R.M.Haridas i/bMr.P.N.Joshi for Petitioners in Wp No.7293 of 2010.
Mr.S.R.Nargolkar, Addl.G.P. for Respondents.
Coram: D.K.Deshmukh , Anoop V. Mohta, & Ranjit More, Jjj.
Dated: 21st April, 2011 Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 133,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 99
},
{
"end": 411,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 391
},
{
"end": 472,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 447
},
{
"end": 733,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 705
},
{
"end": 918,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 840
},
{
"end": 1018,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1009
},
{
"end": 1075,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1064
},
{
"end": 1091,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1082
},
{
"end": 1150,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1137
},
{
"end": 1201,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1189
},
{
"end": 1218,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1204
},
{
"end": 1233,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1222
}
] |
Sebi vs. Timber World Resorts & Plantation & others
In The Court Of Sh. Pawan Kumar Jain,
Additional Sessions Judge-01(Central), Thc: Delhi
Complaint Case No. 25/2014
Id No: 02401R0124632001
Securities And Exchange Board Of India, a statutory body
established under the provisions of Securities and Exchange Board of India
Act, 1992, having its Head Office at Mumbai and Regional office at Block
No. 321, Rajendra Bhawan, Rajendra Place, District Center, New Delhi-
110008 and represented by its Assistant General Manager, Sh. Arvind
Kumar.
Versus
1. Timberworld Resorts & Plantations India Ltd.
A company incorporated under the
provisions of Companies Act, 1956
and having its Registered office at:
M-42, First Floor, Market Commercial Complex,
Greater Kailash- Part Ii, New Delhi-110
........Accused no.1
2. Sh. Ashwani Sud
S/o Late Sh. Lekh Prakash Sud
Director of accused no.1
R/o C-159, East of Kailash
New Delhi
........Accused no.2
3. Sh. Sanjeev Sood
S/o Late Narender Nath Sood
Director of accused no.1
R/o 28, Southern Avenue,
Kolkata-700 026
........Accused no.3
Cc No. 25/2014 Page 1 of 40
Sebi vs. Timber World Resorts & Plantation & others
4. Sh. Rajesh Sud
Director of accused no.1
R/o N-21, Chittaranjan Park,
New Delhi
........Accused no.4
5. Sh. A. V. Mahindra
Director of accused no.1
R/o as of accused no.1
........Accused no.5
Date of Institution : 15.10.2001
Date of Transfer to Sessions Court : 22.09.2014
Date of judgment reserved on : 17.11.2014
Date of pronouncement of judgment : 27.11.2014
Present: Sh. Sanjay Mann, Advocate, counsel for Sebi
Sh. Baldev Raj Advocate, counsel for accused no.1 & 2
Sh. Rajshree Advocate, counsel for accused no.3
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 98,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 82
},
{
"end": 149,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 100
},
{
"end": 242,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 204
},
{
"end": 638,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 594
},
{
"end": 983,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 972
},
{
"end": 1223,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1211
},
{
"end": 1653,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1643
},
{
"end": 1858,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1844
},
{
"end": 2307,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2296
},
{
"end": 2359,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2349
},
{
"end": 2429,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2412
}
] |
Petitioner:
State Of Karnataka And Anr Etc.
Vs.
Respondent:
Shri Ranganatha Reddy & Anr. Etc.
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 30,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 84,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 68
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated : 26..03..2012
Coram
The HonBle Mr.M.Y.EQBAL, Chief Justice
and
The HonBle Mr.JUSTICE T.S.Sivagnanam
W.P.Nos.1015, 1030, 1113, 1989 and 3806 of 2011
and
Connected Miscellaneous Petitions
------------
W.P.No.1015 of 2011
P.Mariadoss ..Petitioner.
Vs.
1. The District Collector,
Kancheepuram District,
Kancheepuram.
2. The Deputy Director,
Geology and Mining,
Kancheepuram,
Kancheepuram District.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Chengalpattu,
Kancheepuram District.
4. The Tahsildar,
Chengalpattu Taluk,
Kancheepuram District. ..Respondents.
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the Proceedings in Na.Ka.3153/2010/A dated 28.09.2010 on the file of the 3rd respondent and the consequential final order made in the proceedings in Na.Ka.3153/2010/A dated 03.01.2011 on the file of the 3rd respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 to conduct the inspection as per G.O.Ms.No.63 Industries (Mma-1) dated 11.05.2005 in the presence of the petitioner and decide the matter afresh after giving full and adequate opportunity by considering the petitioners representations dated 06.10.2010, 11.12.2010 and 04.01.2011.
--------------
W.P.No.1030 of 2011
S.Simsumara Boopathy ..Petitioner.
Vs.
The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Chengalpet,
Kancheepuram District. ..Respondent.
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the respondent relating to the order passed in Ref.Na.Ka.3153/2010/A dated 03.01.2011, quash the same, and pass such further or other orders.
--------------
W.P.No.1113 of 2011
K.Dhanasekar ..Petitioner
Vs.
The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Chengalpet,
Kancheepuram District. ..Respondent.
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the respondent relating to the order passed in Ref.Na.Ka.3153/2010/m dated 03.01.2011, quash the same, and pass such further or other orders.
--------------
W.P.No.1989 of 2011
P.Srinivasan ..Petitioner.
Vs.
The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Chengalpet,
Kancheepuram District. ..Respondent.
Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the respondent relating to the order passed in Ref.Na.Ka.3153/2010/ m dated 03.01.2011, quash the same, and pass such further or other orders.
---------------
W.P.No.3806 of 2011
S.Ramasamy ..Petitioner.
Vs.
1. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Chengalpattu,
Kancheepuram District.
2. The District Collector,
Kancheepuram District,
Kancheepuram. ..Respondents.
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the 1st respondent in Ref.Na.Ka.3153/2010/A, dated 03.01.2011, quash the same, and pass such further or other orders.
-------------
Mr.M.Vivekanandan :: For Petitioner in W.P.No.3806/2011
Mr.V.Sanjeevi :: For Petitioner in W.P.No.1030, 1989,
& 1113 of 2011
Mr.V.T.Gopalan, :: For Petitioner in W.P.No.1015 of 2011
Senior Counsel
For Mr.N.Manokaran
Mr.T.N.Rajagopalan :: For Respondents in all the W.Ps.
Addl. Govt. Pleader
----------------
O R D E R
|
[
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 96,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 87
},
{
"end": 153,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 131
},
{
"end": 286,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 275
},
{
"end": 385,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 322
},
{
"end": 480,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 396
},
{
"end": 562,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 491
},
{
"end": 632,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 572
},
{
"end": 1441,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1421
},
{
"end": 1534,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1473
},
{
"end": 1890,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1878
},
{
"end": 1982,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1921
},
{
"end": 2337,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 2325
},
{
"end": 2431,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2370
},
{
"end": 2790,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 2780
},
{
"end": 2897,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2826
},
{
"end": 2971,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2908
},
{
"end": 3291,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3277
},
{
"end": 3346,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3336
},
{
"end": 3427,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3416
},
{
"end": 3510,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3499
},
{
"end": 3533,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3518
}
] |
Case No.:
Special Leave Petition (civil) 10653 of 1998
Special Leave Petition (civil) 12013 of 1998
Special Leave Petition (civil) 16740 of 1998
Petitioner:
State Of Bihar & Ors.
Vs.
Respondent:
Kameshwar Prasad Singh & Anr.
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 180,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 166
},
{
"end": 229,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 207
}
] |
Petitioner:
C. K. Subramonia Iyer & Ors.
Vs.
Respondent:
T. Kunhikuttan Nair And 6 Ors.
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 35,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 17
},
{
"end": 83,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 67
}
] |
Petitioner:
Hindustan Steel Works Construction Limited Etc. Etc.
Vs.
Respondent:
Hindustan Steel Works Construction Limited Employees' Union
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 54,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 144,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 84
}
] |
Petitioner:
Smt. Gian Devi Anand
Vs.
Respondent:
Jeeevan Kumar And Others
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 32,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 17
},
{
"end": 65,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 52
}
] |
Case No.:
Appeal (civil) 1892 of 2007
Petitioner:
Directorate of Film Festivals & Ors
Respondent:
Gaurav Ashwin Jain & Ors
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 87,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 52
},
{
"end": 119,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 101
}
] |
Petitioner:
The State Of Uttar Pradesh
Vs.
Respondent:
Mohammad Nooh
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 38,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 16
},
{
"end": 71,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 58
}
] |
Petitioner:
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay V.
Vs.
Respondent:
Ranchhoddas Karsondas, Bombay
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 53,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 16
},
{
"end": 102,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 73
}
] |
In The Court Of Sh. Sameer Bajpai, JsccCumAscj
CumGuardian Judge (West): Delhi
Mca No. 09/12
Unique Case I.D. No.02401C0510832012
Sh. Ved Prakash Gupta
S/o Sh. Ram Nath Gupta
1545, Pataudi House,
Darya Ganj, Delhi. .... Appellant
versus
1. Sh. Ram Nath (deceased)
through his LRs:
(A). Smt. Pushpawati Bansal (since deceased)
Through her LRs:
(i). Sh. Shri Nath Bansal
S/o Sh. Late Sh. Onkar Nath Bansal
(ii). Sh. Ravinder Bansal
S/o Late Sh. Onkar Nath Bansal
(iii). Sh. Devender Bansal
S/o Late Sh. Onkar Nath Bansal
All R/o 4756, Jogiwara, Nai Sarak,
Delhi110006.
A(iv). Smt. Sarita W/o Sh. Ajay Gupta
R/o Pooja Apartment,
77, I.P. Estension, Delhi.
Mca No. 09/12 Page No. 1/17
A(v). Sh. Satish Chand
S/o Late Sh. Ram Nath Gupta
Already defendant no. 3.
(B). Smt. Sharda Devi (since deceased)
Through her LRs:
(a). Sh. Laxmi Narain Gupta
S/o Late Satya Narain Gupta
R/o H.No. D135, Kamla Nagar, Delhi
(b). Sh. Jai Kishan Gupta
S/o Late Satya Narain Gupta
R/o H.No. 13/10, Shakti Nagar, Delhi
(c). Sh. Anil Kumar Gupta
S/o Late Satya Narain Gupta
R/o H.No. 14/5, Shakti Nagar, Delhi
(d). Sh. Ajay Gupta
S/o Late Satya Narain Gupta
R/o H.No. 14/5, Shakti Nagar, Delhi
(e). Sh. Sanjay Gupta
S/o Late Satya Narain Gupta
R/o H. No. 25/121, Shakti Nagar, Delhi
(f). Smt. Anita Gupta
R/o 25/121, Shakti Nagar, Delhi.
(C). Smt. Bimla Devi
W/o Late Sat Parkash Gupta
R/o H.No. 42, Gali no. 1,
Kundan Nagar, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi.
(D). Smt. Nirmala Devi
W/o Sh. Suresh Chand
R/o H.No. B604, Mayur Vihar,
PhaseI, Delhi.
Mca No. 09/12 Page No. 2/17
(E). Ms. Sudha Rani Gupta
D/o Late Sh. Ram Nath Gupta
R/o 807808, Farash Khana, Delhi.
2. Smt. Shanti Devi
W/o Late Ram Nath Gupta ( since deceased).
3. Sh. Satish Chand
S/o late Ram Nath Gupta
R/o 807808, Katra Hindu,
Farash Khana, Delhi.
.....Respondents
Date of filing of the suit : 30.10.2012
Date of reserving judgment : 12.05.2014
Date of pronouncement of judgment : 12.05.2014
J U D G M E N T
|
[
{
"end": 33,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 20
},
{
"end": 95,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 35
},
{
"end": 173,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 156
},
{
"end": 338,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 330
},
{
"end": 406,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 389
},
{
"end": 492,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 481
},
{
"end": 579,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 571
},
{
"end": 675,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 660
},
{
"end": 829,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 823
},
{
"end": 1040,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1028
},
{
"end": 1164,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1153
},
{
"end": 1265,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1247
},
{
"end": 1426,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1410
},
{
"end": 1588,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1572
},
{
"end": 1743,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1733
},
{
"end": 1900,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1888
},
{
"end": 2060,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2049
},
{
"end": 2153,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2143
},
{
"end": 2334,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2322
},
{
"end": 2568,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 2552
},
{
"end": 2702,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 2691
},
{
"end": 2790,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2778
}
] |
This Order is modified/corrected by Speaking to Minutes Order dated 04/09/2015
Kvm
1
Arbp167.12Final
In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay
Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction
Arbitration Petition No. 167 Of 2012
Board of Control for Cricket in India, )
a society registered under the Tamil Nadu )
Societies Registration Act, 1975, having its )
head office at Cricket Centre, Wankhade Stadium)
'D' Road, Churchgate, Mumbai - 400 020 )
suing in the name of its Secretary, )
Mr.Sanjay Jagdale ) ..... Petitioner
Versus
1. Nimbus Communications Ltd.,
a company registered under the provisions of
)
)
the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered )
office at Nimbus Centre, Oberoi Complex, )
Off. New Link Road, Andheri (West), )
Mumbai - 400 053 )
2. Neo Sports Broadcast Private Limited )
company registered under the provisions of the )
Companies Act, 1956 having its registered )
office at Nimbus Centre, Oberoi Complex, )
Off. New Link Road, Andheri (West), )
Mumbai - 400 053 ) ..... Respondents
Alongwith
Arbitration Petition No. 595 Of 2012
Nimbus Communications Ltd. )
a company registered under the Companies Act,)
1956 having its registered office at )
Nimbus Centre, Oberoi Complex, )
Off. New Link Road, Andheri (West), )
Mumbai - 400 053 ) ..... Petitioner
Versus
Board of Control for Cricket in India, )
This Order is modified/corrected by Speaking to Minutes Order dated 04/09/2015
Kvm
2
Arbp167.12Final
a Society Registered under the Tamil Nadu )
Societies Registration Act and having its address)
at Cricket Center, Wankhade Stadium, )
Mumbai - 400020 ) ..... Respondent
Mr.T.N.Subramanian, Senior Advocate, a/w. Ms.Akhila Premkumar, Mr.Aditya
Mehta, Mr.Adarsh Saxena, Ms.Prabhjyot Chhabra, i/b.Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
for the Petitioner in Arbitration Petition No.167 of 2012 and for the Respondents in
Arbitration Petition No.595 of 2012.
Mr.Aspi Chinoy, Senior Advocate, a/w. Ms.L.M.Jenkins, i/b.Juris Consultus for the
Respondent no.1 in Arbitration Petition No.167 of 2012 and for the Petitioner in
Arbitration Petition No.595 of 2012.
Mr.Zal Andhyarujina, a/w. Mr.Naser Rizvi, i/b.Thakore Jariwala & Associates for
the Respondent no.2 in Arbitration Petition No.167 of 2012.
Coram : R.D. Dhanuka, J.
Reserved On : 28th July, 2015
Pronounced On : 3Rd September, 2015
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 306,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 272
},
{
"end": 634,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 597
},
{
"end": 1171,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1145
},
{
"end": 1748,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1712
},
{
"end": 2212,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 2186
},
{
"end": 2555,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 2539
},
{
"end": 3330,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3315
},
{
"end": 3373,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3357
},
{
"end": 3394,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3378
},
{
"end": 3412,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3399
},
{
"end": 3434,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3417
},
{
"end": 3688,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3677
},
{
"end": 3726,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3715
},
{
"end": 4002,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3986
},
{
"end": 4023,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 4012
},
{
"end": 4223,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 4211
}
] |
Petitioner:
State Of Kerala
Vs.
Respondent:
K. M. Charia Abdullah & Co.
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 27,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 70,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 47
}
] |
In The Court Of Sh. Narinder Kumar
Additional Sessions Judge (Central): Delhi
Crl. Rev. No.200/13
1. Sh. A.K. Srivastava,
S/o Sh. S.P. Srivastava
2. Smt. Chandini Srivastava,
W/o Sh. A.K. Srivastava,
Both R/o : A137/A, Sector - 27,
Noida (U.P.). .......Petitioners
Versus
Cbi (AcI), New Delhi. .......Respondent
Date of institution : 21.10.2013
Date of Judgment : 15.03.2014
J U D G M E N T
|
[
{
"end": 34,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 20
},
{
"end": 88,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 46
},
{
"end": 138,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 123
},
{
"end": 201,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 182
},
{
"end": 372,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 351
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Patna
Miscellaneous Appeal No.264 of 2008
===========================================================
1. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Chanakya Commerical Complex 3rd Floor, R-Block, Patna through its Branch Manager.
2. The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Branch Office at Tilak Road, Deoria, District- Deoria.
.... .... Appellant/s Versus
1. Smt. Sudha Singh, wife of late Ramanuj Prasad Singh.
2. Miss Diksha Soni, daughter of late Ramanuj Prasad Singh.
3. Astha, daughter of late Ramanuj Prasad Singh.
4. Kumari Sweta Singh, daughter of late Ramanuj Prasad Singh.
(All are resident of Chauhatta Matha, Darbhanga House Road, Ashok Raj Path, P.S.- Pirbahore, District- Patna.)
5. Dinesh Duby, son of late Narbada Dubey, resident of House No.64, Daruf Safa, Lucknow, District- Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh.
.... .... Respondent/s With Miscellaneous Appeal No. 265 of 2008 ===========================================================
1. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Chanakya Commerical Complex 3rd Floor, R- Block, Patna through its Branch Manager.
2. The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Branch Office at Tilak Road, Deoria, District- Deoria.
.... .... Appellant/s Versus
1. Smt. Sudha Singh, wife of late Ramanuj Prasad Singh.
2. Miss Diksha Soni, daughter of late Ramanuj Prasad Singh.
3. Astha, daughter of late Ramanuj Prasad Singh.
4. Kumari Sweta Singh, daughter of late Ramanuj Prasad Singh.
(All are resident of Chauhatta Matha, Darbhanga House Road, Ashok Raj Path, P.S.- Pirbahore, District- Patna.)
5. Dinesh Duby, son of late Narbada Dubey, resident of House No.64, Daruf Safa, Lucknow, District- Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
(In both the Appeals) For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ram Chandra Lal Das, Advocate Mr. Ashok Kumar For the Claimants : Mr. Shambhu Nath, Advocate : Mr. P.K. Roy, Advocate For Respondent no.5 : Mr. Shyam Kishore Singh, Advocate. .
=========================================================== Coram: Honourable Mr. Justice Amaresh Kumar Lal Cav Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 193,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 162
},
{
"end": 317,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 286
},
{
"end": 424,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 413
},
{
"end": 482,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 471
},
{
"end": 533,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 528
},
{
"end": 597,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 579
},
{
"end": 766,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 755
},
{
"end": 1037,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1006
},
{
"end": 1162,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1131
},
{
"end": 1269,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1258
},
{
"end": 1327,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1316
},
{
"end": 1378,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1373
},
{
"end": 1442,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1424
},
{
"end": 1611,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1600
},
{
"end": 1886,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1867
},
{
"end": 1912,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1901
},
{
"end": 1949,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1937
},
{
"end": 1974,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1966
},
{
"end": 2030,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2011
},
{
"end": 2153,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 2136
}
] |
Case No.:
Appeal (civil) 3228 of 2006
Petitioner:
M/s Transcore
Respondent:
Union of India & Anr
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 65,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 56
},
{
"end": 93,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 79
}
] |
Petitioner:
State Bank Of Travancore
Vs.
Respondent:
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kerala
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 36,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 90,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 56
}
] |
In The Court Of Naveen K. Kashyap, Commercial Civil
Judge-Cum-Additional Rent Controller (West), Tis
Hazari Courts, Delhi.
E-88/2013.
1. Ashok Kumar Goel
S/o Late Sh. Hukum Chand Goel,
2. Sh. Raj Kumar Goel,
S/o Late Sh. Hukum Chand Goel,
3. Sh. Des Raj Goel,
S/o Late Sh. Hukum Chand Goel,
All Residents of
House No. B-18 B,
Mansarovar Garden,
New Delhi - 110015. ...Petitioners
Versus
1. Sh. Rajiv Dhawan,
S/o Sh. Durga Dass
R/o F-51, Sector - 40,
Golf Links, Noida, U.P
2. Smt. Khima Dhawan,
W/o Late Sh. Durga Dass,
R/o F-51, Sector - 40,
Golf Links, Noida, U.P
3. Sh. Rohit Dhawan,
S/o Late Sh. Prithvi Nath Dhawan,
R/o 27/24, Shakti Nagar, Delhi - 110007
Also at: Shop No. B-8, Tagore Garden,
Kirti Nagar, New Delhi - 110015.
4. Sh. Sanjiv Dhawan,
S/o Late Sh. Prithvi Nath Dhawan,
R/o B-436, New Friends Colony,
New Delhi - 110065.
Also at: Shop No. B-8, Tagore Garden,
Kirti Nagar, New Delhi - 110015.
......Respondents
E88/2013 Ashok Kr. Goel and others Vs. Rajiv Dhawan and others page no1 of 24
Date of institution : 02/07/2013.
Date of decision : 19/04/2014.
O R D E R
|
[
{
"end": 33,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 16
},
{
"end": 147,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 35
},
{
"end": 187,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 171
},
{
"end": 253,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 239
},
{
"end": 318,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 306
},
{
"end": 609,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 597
},
{
"end": 725,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 713
},
{
"end": 846,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 834
},
{
"end": 1050,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1037
},
{
"end": 1377,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1363
},
{
"end": 1405,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1393
}
] |
Petitioner:
The State Trading Corporation Of India Ltd. & Others
Vs.
Respondent:
The Commercial Tax Officer, Visakhapatnam And Others
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 50,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 16
},
{
"end": 136,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 88
}
] |
Reportable
In The Supreme Court Of India
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
Civil Appeal Nos. 5478-5483 Of 2014
(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) Nos.
24297-24302 of 2007)
Union of India & Ors. `
…. Appellants
Versus
Shiv Raj & Ors. ….
Respondents
1 Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 65,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 43
},
{
"end": 329,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 315
},
{
"end": 436,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 428
}
] |
In The Court Of The Xix Addl. City Civil &
Sessions Judge At Bangalore City:
(Cch.18)
Dated this 16th day of June, 2015.
Present
Smt.K.B.Geetha, M.A., Ll.B.,
Xix Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge,
Bangalore City.
O.S.No.7999/2013
Plaintiff : Sri.Kiran Kumar.T,
Aged about 30 years,
s/o Sri.H.Thippa Reddy,
r/at No.466, Rajapalya,
Hoody, Itpl Main Road,
Mahadevapura Post,
Bangalore East Taluk.
(By Sri N.Satish,Advocate)
-Vs-
Defendants : 1. Smt.Venkatamma,
Aged about 57 years,
w/o late Munivenkatappa.
2. Sri.M.Srinivas,
Aged about 42 years,
s/o late Munivenkatappa.
3. Sri.M.Narayan,
Aged about 38 years,
s/o late Munivenkatappa.
All r/at No.285,
"Om Nilaya", 2nd Main,
4th Cross, Nallurahalli Village,
Whitefield Post,
Bangalore East Taluk,
Bangalore-560 066.
(D.1 to D.3 - By Sri.N.K.K. Advocate)
2 O.S.No.7999/2013
Date of Institution of the suit : 31/10/2013
Nature of the Suit : Recovery of money.
Date of commencement of
recording of evidence : 12/6/2014
Date on which the
Judgment was pronounced : 16/6/2015
Year/s Month/s Day/s
Total Duration : 01 07 15
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 79,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 201,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 191
},
{
"end": 350,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 339
},
{
"end": 594,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 586
},
{
"end": 653,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 643
},
{
"end": 760,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 750
},
{
"end": 872,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 863
},
{
"end": 1223,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1217
}
] |
* In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi
Date of decision: 3rd August, 2012
+ Fao. No.445/2000
Sanjay ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate
Versus
Suresh Chand & Ors. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate for
R-3.
Coram:
Hon'Ble Mr. Justice G.P.Mittal
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 48,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 16
},
{
"end": 167,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 161
},
{
"end": 278,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 267
},
{
"end": 341,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 329
},
{
"end": 450,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 438
},
{
"end": 567,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 557
}
] |
Petitioner:
Smt. Sarabati Devi & Anr.
Vs.
Respondent:
Smt. Usha Devi
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 30,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 17
},
{
"end": 71,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 62
}
] |
In The Court Of Shri Raj Kumar: Addl. District
Judge17: Tis Hazari Courts : Delhi
Suit No. 376/14 (Old Suit No. 54/06)
Unique Case Id No. 02401C0470982006
Hari Prakash S/o Sh. Jug Lal,
Represented by his General Attorney
Sh. Prem Chand, S/o Sh. Suraj Bhan,
R/o A37, Christian Colony, Patel Chest,
Delhi. ........... Plaintiff.
Versus
M/s Cool All Beverages (P) Ltd.
Through its Director
Sh. P.S. Sareen, Plot No. 242,
Ground Floor, Industrial Area,
Patparganj, Delhi. ......... Defendant.
Date of institution of the suit : 30.05.2006
Date on which order was reserved : 11.11.2014
Date of decision : 02.12.2014
Suit For Recovery Of Rs. 4,95,000/ As Damages For
Unlawful & Unauthorized Occupation And Use
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 30,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 21
},
{
"end": 93,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 32
},
{
"end": 181,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 169
},
{
"end": 475,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 448
}
] |
Petitioner:
R. K. Sabharwal And Ors.
Vs.
Respondent:
State Of Punjab And Ors.
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 27,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 71,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 56
}
] |
Petitioner:
Azhar Hussain
Vs.
Respondent:
Rajiv Gandhi
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 25,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 57,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 45
}
] |
Lac No. 125/14
Union of India v Gaon Sabha Dhoolsiras & Others
Dod : 11.11.2014
In The Court Of Sh. Raj Kumar Tripathi
Additional District Judge04, South West
Dwarka Courts, New Delhi
Lac no. 125/14 Award No. 9/20082009
Computerized No. 02405C0256322010 Village Dhoolsiras
In the Matter of
Union of India
Versus
1. Gaon Sabha,
Dhoolsiras Ip no. 1
2. Suresh @ Suresh Bahadur
S/o Shri Sarjeet,
R/o Village Dhoolsiras,
New Delhi Ip no. 2
Date of Institution : 26.08.2011
Date of Receipt in this court by way of transfer : 26.02.2014
Date of reserving judgment : 27.10.2014
Date of pronouncement of judgment : 11.11.2014
1 of 18
Lac No. 125/14
Union of India v Gaon Sabha Dhoolsiras & Others
Dod : 11.11.2014
J U D G M E N T
|
[
{
"end": 260,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 242
},
{
"end": 357,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 271
},
{
"end": 568,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 554
},
{
"end": 628,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 618
},
{
"end": 741,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 718
}
] |
Case No.:
Writ Petition (civil) 61 of 2002
Petitioner:
M.Nagaraj & Others
Respondent:
Union of India & Others
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 66,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 57
},
{
"end": 108,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 94
}
] |
Petitioner:
Empire Industries Limited & Ors. Etc.
Vs.
Respondent:
Union Of India & Ors. Etc.
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 37,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 83,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 69
}
] |
The Honble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan And The Honble Sri Justice M.Satyanarayana Murthy
Writ Petition No.39671 of 2015
31-03-2016
Mrs.Samala Dhana Laxmi .Petitioner
1) The State of Telangana rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department,
Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad & Ors.. Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Vedula Venkataramana, Learned Senior Counsel for Sri Kurti Bhaskara Rao.
Counsel for respondents: The Advocate-General (Tg) Government Pleader for Home (Tg) Government Pleader for P & E (Tg) Government Pleader for Revenue (Tg) <Gist:
>Head Note:
? Citations:
1. (2006) 2 Ald 367
2. (2006) 5 Alt 739
3. (2011) 5 Scc 244
4. (2012) 2 Scc 386
5. (1975) 3 Scc 198
6. (2005) 3 Scc 663
7. (1999) 4 Scc 514
8. (2011) 10 Scc 215
9. (1970) 1 Scc 98
10. (2012) 2 Scc 176
11. Air 1953 Sc 318 = 1953 Scr 708
12. (1998) 1 Wlr 503 (Ca)
13. (2004) 7 Scc 467
14. (2004) 3 Scc 75
15. 2013 (4) Alt 243 (D.B)
16. Air 1981 Sc 746
17. (1996) 3 Scc 194
18. (1990) 3 Scc 148
19. (1974) 1 Scc 103
20. 1996(4) Alt 485 = (1997)1 ALT(Cri) 184
21. (2008) 3 Scc 613
22. (1975) 3 Scc 198
23. (2011) 10 Scc 781 = 2012 (5) Scj 800
24. (1975) 2 Scc 81
25. (1951) 342 Us 98
26. (1990) 2 Scc 1
27. Air 1966 Sc 740
28. (1980) 4 Scc 531
29. (1972) 2 Scc 542
30. (1974) 1 Scc 637
31. (1975) 1 Scc 837
32. (1975) 3 Scc 395
33. (1974) 4 Scc 463
34. (1970) 3 Scc 746
35. (1972) 3 Scc 831
36. (1969) 1 Scc 10
37. (1969) 2 Scc 426
38. (1972) 3 Scc 845
39. (1972) 1 Scc 498
40. (1974) 1 Scc 185
41. (1992) 2 Scc 177
42. (2000) 6 Scc 168
43. (1980) 3 Scc 57
44. 2002 (1) Alt 611 (Fb)
45. 2004 (1) Ald (Crl.) 561
46. Air 1952 Sc 196
47. 1917 Ac 260
48. (1975) 4 Scc 47
49. Air 1951 Sc 157 = 1951 Scr 167
50. (1986) 4 Scc 378
51. Air 1967 Sc 295
52. (1974) 1 Scc 645
53. Air 1964 Sc 72
54. Air 1950 Fc 129
55. (1980) 4 Scc 470
56. (1995) 4 Scc 51
57. (1979) 4 Scc 370
58. (1975) 3 Scc 722
59. 1954 Scr 418
60. (1974) 4 Scc 573
61. 1943 Fcr 49
62. Air 1951 Sc 174
63. (1974) 3 Scc 600
64. Ilr 1972 Ap 1025
65. (1975) 3 Scc 710 The Honble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan And The Honble Sri Justice M.Satyanarayana Murthy Writ Petition No.39671 of 2015 Order
|
[
{
"end": 41,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 23
},
{
"end": 94,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 72
},
{
"end": 184,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 166
},
{
"end": 226,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 208
},
{
"end": 387,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 367
},
{
"end": 438,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 420
},
{
"end": 2171,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 2153
},
{
"end": 2221,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 2199
}
] |
Reportable
In The Supreme Court Of India
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
Civil Appeal No. 5433 Of 2008
(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.16886 of 2008)
Commissioner of Income Tax,
Dehradun & Anr. ... Appellants
v.
Enron Oil & Gas India Ltd. ....
Respondent
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 58,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 36
},
{
"end": 242,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 206
},
{
"end": 347,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 321
}
] |
Petitioner:
Suresh Koshy George
Vs.
Respondent:
The University Of Kerala & Ors.
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 31,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 75,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 55
}
] |
In The High Court Of Karnataka,
Dharwad Bench
Dated This The 03Rd Day Of March, 2014
Before:
The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice K.N. Phaneendra
Criminal Appeal No. 100014/2014
C/w Criminal Appeal No.100009/2014
Between:
In Crl. A. No.100014/2014:
1. Ramesh
S/o Giddappa Waddar,
Aged about 29 years,
Occupation: Lorry Maintenance,
R/o Ramalingana Gudi,
Chitrakeri Street, Hospete,
(Undergoing Sentence).
2. Baba Patel S/o Mohammed
Patel Biradar,
Aged about 24 years,
Occupation: Driver,
R/o Gudnal, Muddebihal Taluk,
District : Bijapur,
Presently Behind Regional
Transport Office, B.T. Nagar,
Hospet. (Undergoing Sentence). ... Appellants
(By Sri. Vijay S. Chiniwar and
Sri. Mahiboob S. Halli, Advs.)
2
And:
The State by Munirabad Police,
Represented by
State Public Prosecutor,
Dharawad. ... Respondent
(By Sri. V.M. Banakar, Addl. Spp)
This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2)
of Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to allow this
appeal and set aside the judgment and order of
conviction passed by the learned District and Sessions
Judge, Koppal in S.C. No.21/2013 dated 11.12.2013,
and 12.12.2013, convicting the appellants for the
offence punishable under Section 392 of I.P.C.
In Crl. A. No.100009/2014:
1. Krishna
S/o Tirupalappa,
Aged about 28 years,
Occupation: Driver,
R/o Ward No.28,
Chapparad Halli,
Hospete,
District Bellary.
2. Kumar
S/o Venkappa Devaramani,
Aged about 26 years,
Occupation: Driver,
3
R/o Behind Regional
Transport Office,
B.T. Nagar, Hospet,
District : Bijapur. ... Appellants
(By Sri. S.B. Naik, Adv. for Sri. K.L. Patil, Advs.)
And:
The State of Karnataka,
Rep. by State Public Prosecutor,
High Court of Karnataka. ... Respondent
(By Sri. V.M. Banakar, Addl. Spp)
This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2)
of Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to allow this
appeal and set aside the judgment and order of
conviction passed by the learned District and Sessions
Judge, Koppal in S.C. No.21/2013 dated 11.12.2013,
and 12.12.2013, convicting the appellants for the
offence punishable under Section 411 of I.P.C. and
acquit the appellants of the charges.
These Criminal Appeals coming on for dictating
Judgment this day, the Court delivered the following:
4
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 63,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 185,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 170
},
{
"end": 324,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 318
},
{
"end": 517,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 507
},
{
"end": 818,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 801
},
{
"end": 857,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 840
},
{
"end": 935,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 910
},
{
"end": 1066,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1054
},
{
"end": 1485,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1478
},
{
"end": 1666,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1661
},
{
"end": 1946,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1937
},
{
"end": 1972,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1962
},
{
"end": 2011,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1993
},
{
"end": 2137,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2125
}
] |
The Honble Sri Justice C. Praveen Kumar
Criminal Petition No.6355 Of 2013
28-01-2014
M/s. Vasundhara Projects Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director
Sri K.V.Ramesh and three others......PETITIONERS/ACCUSED
The State of A.P. rep.by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and
another..RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT
Counsel for Petitioner/Accused : Sri P.Nagendera Reddy
Counsel for Respondents.: Sri A.Hanumantha Reddy for
R-2
<Gist :
>Head Note :
? Cases referred :
2013 (1) Dt (Sc) 428
2Air 2010 Sc 1402
3 2013 (1_ Scc, 271
4 2013 (3) Alt (Criminal) 224 Sc
5 1999 (8) Scc 608
6 1998 (2) Ald (Crl.) 201 (A.P.)
7 1998 Crl.L.J. 22
8 2002 (1) Ald (Crl.) 197 (Ap)
9 Air 1965 Sc 1248
10Air 1963 Andhra Pradesh 442 (V.50 C 139)
112012 (1) Ald (Crl.) 549 (Ap)
12(2011) 13 Supreme Court Cases, 148
13Air 2010 Supreme Court, 2596
141999 Crl.L.J. 4246
15Air 2002 Supreme Court 3014
Honble Sri Justice C.Praveen Kumar
Criminal Petition No.6355 Of 2013
Order
|
[
{
"end": 39,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 23
},
{
"end": 138,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 109
},
{
"end": 197,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 187
},
{
"end": 279,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 266
},
{
"end": 447,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 430
},
{
"end": 498,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 480
},
{
"end": 1045,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1030
}
] |
In The Court Of Sh.Suresh Chand Rajan
Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Ndps)
Dwarka Courts, New Delhi
Crl. Appeal No.06/14
Kuldeep Kumar
S/o Sh Baliram
....Appellant
Vs.
Hemlata
D/o Sh Nannumal
...... Respondent
Date of Institution : 13.01.2014
Reserved for order on : 28.03.2014
Date of Pronouncement: 31.03.2014
Order
|
[
{
"end": 37,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 19
},
{
"end": 121,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 40
},
{
"end": 159,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 146
},
{
"end": 287,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 280
}
] |
In The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
Principal Seat At Jabalpur.
Election Petition No.04/2014
Dr.Vivek Tiwari
Vs.
Shri Divyaraj Singh
____________________________________________________
Present: Hon'ble Shri Justice C.V. Sirpurkar
Shri R.P.Agrawal, Senior counsel with Shri Anuj Agrawal,
counsel for the petitioner.
Shri Anuvad Shrivastava, counsel for the respondent
No.1.
Shri Siddharth Seth, counsel for the respondent Nos.2,3
& 4.
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 70,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 147,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 135
},
{
"end": 216,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 202
},
{
"end": 317,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 303
},
{
"end": 334,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 323
},
{
"end": 373,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 361
},
{
"end": 426,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 408
},
{
"end": 480,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 466
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
Tr.P(Crl.).No. 50 of 2003(A)
1. M.S. Santhoshkumar, S/O. Soman,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. K.G. Mohanan, Kadavunkal House,
... Respondent
2. State Of Kerala, Rep. By Public
For Petitioner :Sri.Grashious Kuriakose
For Respondent :Sri.P.R.Ramachandra Menon
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.Basant
Dated :10/07/2008
O R D E R
R.Basant, J
------------------------------------
Tr.P.(Crl.). No.50 of 2003
-------------------------------------
Dated this the 11th day of July, 2008
Order
|
[
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 94,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 76
},
{
"end": 192,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 180
},
{
"end": 275,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 260
},
{
"end": 349,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 330
},
{
"end": 409,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 388
},
{
"end": 443,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 435
},
{
"end": 512,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 504
}
] |
Case No.:
Appeal (civil) 2641 of 2000
Petitioner:
State Of H.P. and Ors.
Respondent:
Gujarat Ambuja Cement Ltd. and Anr.
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 65,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 52
},
{
"end": 114,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 88
}
] |
1
Criminal Appeal No.343/1997
Criminal Appeal No.360/1997
Criminal Appeal No.365/1997
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh At Jabalpur
Single Bench
Present : Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. K. Gupta
Criminal Appeal No.343/1997
Rayees @ Achche Chacha
-Versus-
State of Madhya Pradesh
Criminal Appeal No.360/1997
Noor Mohammad
-Versus-
State of Madhya Pradesh
Criminal Appeal No.365/1997
Shabir Khan and another
-Versus-
State of Madhya Pradesh
.................................................................................................
Shri Shakeel Ahmed, counsel for the appellants.
Shri Akshay Namdeo, Panel Lawyer for the State.
.................................................................................................
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 315,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 275
},
{
"end": 407,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 396
},
{
"end": 518,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 496
},
{
"end": 629,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 606
},
{
"end": 730,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 717
},
{
"end": 836,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 813
},
{
"end": 935,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 924
},
{
"end": 1053,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1030
},
{
"end": 1179,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1166
},
{
"end": 1235,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1222
}
] |
This Order is modified/corrected by Speaking to Minutes Order
Cri. Applns. 1346,1347, 1348/05
1
In The High Court At Bombay
Appellate Side, Bench At Aurangabad
Criminal Application No. 1346 Of 2005
Mr. Amol Shripal Sheth ....Applicant.
Versus
M/s. Hari Om Trading Co. & Ors. ....Respondents.
Mr. S.B. Lakhotiya h/f. Mr. R.F. Totala, Advocate for applicant.
Mr. K.C. Sant, Advocate for respondent No. 1.
With
Criminal Application No. 1347 Of 2005
Mr. Amol Shripal Sheth ....Applicant.
Versus
M/s. Haryana Trading Co. & Ors. ....Respondents.
Mr. S.B. Lakhotiya h/f. Mr. R.F. Totala, Advocate for applicant.
Mr. K.C. Sant, Advocate for respondent No. 1.
With
Criminal Application No. 1348 Of 2005
Mr. Amol Shripal Sheth ....Applicant.
Versus
M/s. Sunderpuriya Brothers & Ors. ....Respondents.
This Order is modified/corrected by Speaking to Minutes Order
Cri. Applns. 1346,1347, 1348/05
2
Mr. S.B. Lakhotiya h/f. Mr. R.F. Totala, Advocate for applicant.
Mr. K.C. Sant, Advocate for respondent No. 1.
Coram : T. V. Nalawade, J.
Dated : 3rd October, 2012.
Order
|
[
{
"end": 250,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 230
},
{
"end": 540,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 522
},
{
"end": 701,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 682
},
{
"end": 1094,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1076
},
{
"end": 1207,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1188
},
{
"end": 1283,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1269
},
{
"end": 1304,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1293
},
{
"end": 1348,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1339
},
{
"end": 1510,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1492
},
{
"end": 1611,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1590
},
{
"end": 2040,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2026
},
{
"end": 2061,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2050
},
{
"end": 2105,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2096
},
{
"end": 2278,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 2264
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
CRL.A.No. 1877 of 2006()
1. Dasan @ Viswambaran,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. State Of Kerala.
... Respondent
For Petitioner :Sri.S.Sachithananda Pai
For Respondent :Public Prosecutor
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.Basant
The Hon'ble Mrs. Justice M.C.Hari Rani
Dated :29/01/2010
O R D E R
R.Basant & M.C.Hari Rani, Jj.
*************************
Crl.Appeal No.1877 of 2006
******************************
Dated this the 29th day of January 2010
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 91,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 72
},
{
"end": 180,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 165
},
{
"end": 283,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 264
},
{
"end": 369,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 361
},
{
"end": 408,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 395
},
{
"end": 464,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 456
},
{
"end": 480,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 467
}
] |
1
Cr.R.No.856/2013
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
Bench At Gwalior
Sb : Hon'Ble Mr. Justice N.K. Gupta
Cr.R. No. 856 of 2013
Rajendra Bharti
Vs.
Shri Narottam Mishra & Ors.
Whether reportable :- Yes /No
__________________________________________________________
For Applicant : Shri V.K. Saxena, Senior Advocate
with Shri Aditya Singh, Advocate.
For Respondents : Shri V.K.Bharadwaj,Senior Advocate
No. 1 & 2 with Shri M.P.S Raghuvanshi,
Advocate.
For Respondent : Shri Arvind Dudawat, Additional
No. 3/State Advocate General.
Order
|
[
{
"end": 136,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 76
},
{
"end": 185,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 175
},
{
"end": 273,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 258
},
{
"end": 350,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 335
},
{
"end": 494,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 483
},
{
"end": 565,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 553
},
{
"end": 626,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 613
},
{
"end": 701,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 684
},
{
"end": 794,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 780
}
] |
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh At Jabalpur
Writ Petition No : 5399 Of 2010
Ashok Kumar Panchratan
- V/s -
Registrar, Public Trust and another
Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Menon.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri R.N.Singh, Senior Counsel with Shri Alok Pathak, for the petitioner.
Shri Rajesh Tiwari, Govt. Advocate, for respondent no.1
Shri Kishore Shrivastava, learned Senior Counsel with Shri Abinash Jargar and
Shri A.Sapre for respondent no.2.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order
|
[
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 0
},
{
"end": 163,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 141
},
{
"end": 280,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 257
},
{
"end": 356,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 342
},
{
"end": 471,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 462
},
{
"end": 509,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 498
},
{
"end": 557,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 544
},
{
"end": 627,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 608
},
{
"end": 676,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 662
},
{
"end": 701,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 694
}
] |
Case No.:
Appeal (civil) 3595-3612 of 1999
Petitioner:
Secretary, State of Karnataka and others
Respondent:
Umadevi and others
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 86,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 57
},
{
"end": 118,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 111
}
] |
Petitioner:
Sitaram Motilal Kalal
Vs.
Respondent:
Santanuprasad Jaishankar Bhatt
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 33,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 83,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 53
}
] |
E. No.02/2010 1 18.09.2014
In The Court Of Ms. Kiran Gupta, Senior Civil JudgeCum
Rent Controller: Patiala House Courts: New Delhi
E. No.02/2010
Unique Id No.02403C0050002010
S.K. Gupta
S/o Late Sh. Devi Charan Gupta,
R/o 6, Under Hill Road,
Civil Lines, Delhi110054
....... Petitioner
Versus
1. M/s Him Traders Pvt. Ltd.
84, Tolstoy Lane, Janpath,
New Delhi110001
Through its Managing Director
Sh. R.K. Gupta/Director
2. Sh. Balbir Singh Mayal,
84, Tolstoy Lane, Janpath,
New Delhi110001
3. Sh. Swaran Singh Mayal
84, Tolstoy Lane, Janpath,
New Delhi110001
4. M/s New Airways Travels Delhi Pvt. Ltd.
84, Tolstoy Lane, Janpath,
New Delhi110001
Through its Managing Director
........ Respondents
Date of institution: 08.02.2010
Date of arguments : 16.09.2014
Date of decision : 18.09.2014
S.K. Gupta Vs. Him Traders Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Page 1 of 36
E. No.02/2010 2 18.09.2014
J U D G M E N T
|
[
{
"end": 119,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 108
},
{
"end": 451,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 441
},
{
"end": 666,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 645
},
{
"end": 811,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 793
},
{
"end": 893,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 875
},
{
"end": 991,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 956
},
{
"end": 1356,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1346
},
{
"end": 1382,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1361
}
] |
Neeraj Vs Ajeet & Ors
In The Court Of Sh. K. S. Mohi: Presiding Officer : Mact
South Distt. Saket Courts, New Delhi
In Petition No. 355/13
In Fir No. 385/13, P.S Sangam Vihar
Unique Case Id : 02403C0361042013
1. Sh. Neeraj (Father)
S/o Sh. Kalicharan
2. Smt. Kamlesh (Mother)
W/o Sh. Neeraj
Both R/o
K118D/355, BlockK,
Sangam Vihar, Delhi110062. ...... Petitioners
Versus
1. Sh. Ajeet
S/o Sh. Devi Charan
R/o Village Parasar,
Tehsil Mat, Distt. Mathura,
Uttar Pradesh. ............ Driver
2. Tilak Raj
S/o Sh. Krishan
R/o 1754, L1, Gali No. 8,
Sangam Vihar, New Delhi. ........... Owner
3. Bharti Axa General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Noida, U.P. ........ Insurer
.......Respondents
Petition No. : 355/13 Page No. 1 of 16
Neeraj Vs Ajeet & Ors
Date of Institution : 28.10.2013
Date of reserving of judgment/order : 12.09.2014
Date of pronouncement : 12.09.2014
J U D G M E N T
|
[
{
"end": 6,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 0
},
{
"end": 15,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 10
},
{
"end": 65,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 55
},
{
"end": 153,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 87
},
{
"end": 269,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 263
},
{
"end": 366,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 359
},
{
"end": 659,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 654
},
{
"end": 886,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 877
},
{
"end": 1102,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1065
},
{
"end": 1541,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1535
},
{
"end": 1550,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1545
}
] |
Honble Dr. Justice B.Siva Sankara Rao
C.R.P.No.4289 Of 2015
04-08-2016.
Mekala Satyanarayana..Petitioner
Angadala Veera Raju and others ..Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner:Sri Thota Suneetha
Counsel for the respondents: Sri K.Sai Mohan Rao
<Gist:
>Head Note:
? Citations:
2008(4) Ald 71
2 1996(5) Scc 181
3 Air 1982 Sc 558
4 2001(1) Ald 77(Db)
5 2002(6) Ald 251
6 2015(4) Ald 394
7 Air 1958 Sc 687
8 Air 2005 Sc 2821(1)
9 (2003) 8 Scc 498
10 (2004)8 Scc 402
11Air 2005 Sc 353(1)
12 (1966) Air 1966 Sc 1631
13 Air 1968 Ap 309(Vol.55, C.68)
14 2010(7) scale 428
Honble Dr. Justice B.Siva Sankara Rao
C.R.P.No.4289 Of 2015
Order
|
[
{
"end": 37,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 19
},
{
"end": 107,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 87
},
{
"end": 141,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 122
},
{
"end": 215,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 201
},
{
"end": 305,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 290
},
{
"end": 732,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 714
}
] |
46
*In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi
+ Fao No.842/2003
Date of Decision: 21st December, 2009
%
Rajesh Tyagi & Ors. ..... Appellants
Through : None.
versus
Jaibir Singh & Ors. ..... Respondents
Through : Mr. Atul Nanda Standing.
Counsel for Union of India.
Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Additional
Standing Counsel for Delhi
Police.
Mr. V.P. Chaudhary, Sr. Adv.
and Mr. Anoop Bhambhani,
amicus curiae.
Mr. Arun Mohan, Sr. Adv.
and Ms.Rajdeepa Behura,
Adv. as Members of the
Committee appointed by
the Court.
Mr. Manoj Ranjan Sinha,
Adv.
for R - 3.
Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Adv.
for New India Assurance Co.
Ltd.
Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Adv. for
National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa and
Ms. Harsh Lata, Advs.
for Oriental Insurance Co.
Ltd.
Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Adv. for
United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. for
Reliance General Insurance Co.
Ltd.
Mr. Atul Nanda, Adv. for
Bajaj Reliance General
Insurance Co. Ltd., Future
Generali India Insurance Co.
Ltd. and Icici Lombard
General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Ms. Shantha Devi Raman,
Fao No.842/2003 Page 1 of 7
Adv. for Iffco Tokyo
General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Ms. Anjali Bansal, Adv. for
Tata Aig General Insurance
Co. Ltd.
Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for
Royal Sundaram Alliance
Insurance Co. Ltd. and
Universal Sompo General
Insurance Co. Ltd.
Mr. Sunil Kapoor and Mr.
Anurag Sharma, Advs. for
Hdfc Ergo General
Insurance Co. Ltd.
Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. for
Cholamandalam.
Coram :-
The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice J.R. Midha
1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may Yes
be allowed to see the Judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes
3. Whether the judgment should be Yes
reported in the Digest?
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 43,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 11
},
{
"end": 175,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 163
},
{
"end": 290,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 278
},
{
"end": 370,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 360
},
{
"end": 488,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 477
},
{
"end": 650,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 636
},
{
"end": 716,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 701
},
{
"end": 811,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 801
},
{
"end": 876,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 861
},
{
"end": 1085,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1067
},
{
"end": 1219,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1203
},
{
"end": 1371,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1359
},
{
"end": 1697,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1684
},
{
"end": 1823,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1808
},
{
"end": 1980,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1970
},
{
"end": 2220,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2207
},
{
"end": 2334,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2316
},
{
"end": 2574,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2561
},
{
"end": 2741,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 2730
},
{
"end": 3033,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3021
},
{
"end": 3090,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3077
},
{
"end": 3259,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3248
},
{
"end": 3363,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 3353
}
] |
In The Court Of Sh. R.K. Gauba: District & Sessions
Judge (South District) Saket: New Delhi
(i) Criminal Revision No. 311/13
Id No.: 02406R0312412013
Sanjeev Kumar
Jr. Engineer, (Building)
Office of the Executive Engineer
South Zone, Sdmc
Green Park, New Delhi. ... Revisionist
Versus
1. The State
Government of Nct of Delhi
Through the Commissioner of Police
Police Head Quarters,
I. P. Estate, New Delhi.
2. Corruption Oonmulan, SansthanNGO
Rz56, Chandan Colony, Saidulajaib, New Delhi.
Through its President:
Pavit Singh s/o Sh. Satbir Singh
R/o Rz56, Chandan Colony,
Saidulajaib, New Delhi. ... Respondents
(ii) Criminal Revision No. 320/13
Id No.: 02406R0322112013
State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Through Public Prosecutor (South). ... Revisionist
Versus
Crl. Rev. No. 311/2013 & 320/2013. Page No. 1 of 26
1. Corruption Onmulan Sanstha (Ngo)
Through its President
Pavit Singh
R/o Rz56, Chandan Colony,
Saidulazab, New Delshi 30.
2. South Delhi Municipal Corporation
Through its Commissioner,
Civic Centre, Minto Road, New Delhi .... Respondents
Instituted on: 12.11.2013 & 21.11.2013 respectively.
Judgment reserved on:03.02.2014.
Judgment pronounced on: 03.02.2014
J U D G M E N T
|
[
{
"end": 30,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 20
},
{
"end": 97,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 32
},
{
"end": 185,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 172
},
{
"end": 361,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 356
},
{
"end": 396,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 370
},
{
"end": 528,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 509
},
{
"end": 849,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 844
},
{
"end": 1054,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1028
},
{
"end": 1217,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1184
}
] |
Before The Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court
Dated : 04/11/2006
Coram
The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice P.K. Misra
The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice N.Paul Vasanthakumar
And
The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice G.Rajasuria
Writ Appeal (Md) No.313 Of 2006
and
M.P.No.1 Of 2006
1. Director of Elementary Education,
Chennai 6.
2. District Elementary Educational
Officer, Thoothukkudi,
Thoothukkudi District.
3. Assistant Elementary Educational
Officer,
Alkwarthirunagari 628 623.
Thoothukkudi District. ... Appellants
Vs.
1. Tmt.S. Vigila
3/127, Church Street,
Meignanapuram,
Thiruchendur Taluk,
Thoothukudi District.
2. Manager,
Meerania Middle School,
Alagiamanavalapuram,
Alwarthirunagari,
Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents
Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order
passed by the learned single dated 13.4.2006 made in W.P.(Md) No.1641 of 2004.
!For Appellants ... Mr.R. Viduthalai
Advocate General
Assisted by
Mr.R. Janakiramulu
Special Govt. Pleader
^For Respondents ... Mr.K. Chellapandian for
Mr.V. Panneerselvam.
Mr.Issac Mohanlal,
Amicus Curiae.
:Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 45,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 11
},
{
"end": 108,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 98
},
{
"end": 152,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 132
},
{
"end": 191,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 180
},
{
"end": 298,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 252
},
{
"end": 386,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 304
},
{
"end": 491,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 392
},
{
"end": 535,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 522
},
{
"end": 735,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 631
},
{
"end": 948,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 935
},
{
"end": 1008,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 993
},
{
"end": 1077,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1061
},
{
"end": 1105,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1089
},
{
"end": 1129,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1115
}
] |
Fir No. 148/13 : State V/s Sunil @ Machhar : Ps Ashok Vihar Dod: 22.04.2015
In The Court Of Vinod Yadav: Addl. Sessions Judge:
(NorthWest)01: Rohini District Courts: Delhi
(Sessions Case No. 133/13)
Unique Id case No.02404R0236022013
State Vs. Sunil @ Machhar
Fir No. : 148/13
U/s : 377 Ipc & 4 of Pocso Act
P.S. : Ashok Vihar
State Vs. Sunil @ Machhar
S/o Sh. Prem Raj Pal
R/o Wpx81, Jhuggie Wazirpur Village,
Ashok Vihar, Delhi.
Date of institution of case 26.08.2013
Date of arguments : 10.04.2015
Date of pronouncement of judgment : 22.04.2015
J U D G M E N T
|
[
{
"end": 23,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 18
},
{
"end": 44,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 29
},
{
"end": 149,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 138
},
{
"end": 227,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 151
},
{
"end": 300,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 295
},
{
"end": 338,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 323
},
{
"end": 476,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 471
},
{
"end": 514,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 499
}
] |
M.F.A.No.23183/2009
:1:
In The High Court Of Karnataka
Dharwad Bench
Dated This The 31st Day Of August, 2017
Before
The Hon'Ble Dr.Justice H.B.Prabhakara Sastry
Mfa No.23183/2009 (Mv)
Between:
1. Smt.Iramma W/O Bhimangouda Patil @ Goudar,
Age: 45 Years, Occ: Household Work,
2. Smt.Parwatewwa @ Tippawwa
W/O Hanumgouda Patil @ Goudar,
Age: 72 Years, Occ: Household Work,
3. Savita D/O Bhimangouda Patil @ Goudar,
Age: 23 Years, Occ: Student,
4. Hanumgouda S/O Bhimangouda Patil @ Goudar,
Age: 22 Years, Occ: Student,
All R/O Madarkhandi, Tq.Jamakhandi, Dist: Bagalkot.
... Appellants
(By Sri.N.L.Batakurki, Adv.)
And:
1. Sri.Surendra S/O Venkanna Gadadi,
Age: Major, Occ: Business,
R/O Murnal Village, Tq. & Dist: Bagalkot.
2. Raghavendra S/O Vivekanand Vaidya,
Age: Major, Occ: Owner Of Lorry
No.Ka-31/190, R/O Gaddankeri, Tq.Bagalkot.
3. The Branch Manager,
National Insurance Co.Ltd.,
M.F.A.No.23183/2009
:2:
Melligari Complex, Bagalkot.
4. Shriram Investments Ltd.,
Branch Offie, Navanagar.
... Respondents
(By Sri.M.Amaregouda, Adv. For R1,
Sri.Santosh B.Mane, Adv. For R2,
Sri.P.H.Pawar, Adv. For R3,
R4 Served And Unpresented)
---
This Mfa Is Filed Under Section 173(1) Of The Mv
Act, 1988 Against The Judgment And Award Dated
26.09.2008, Passed In Mvc No.357/2004 On The File Of The
Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.V, Jamkhandi,
Dismissing The Claim Petition For Compensation And
Seeking Set Aside The Impugned Judgment And Award
Dated 26.09.2008 In Mvc No.357/2004.
This Appeal Having Been Heard And Reserved For
Judgment Coming On For Pronouncement Of Judgment
This Day, The Court Delivered The Following:
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 133,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 76
},
{
"end": 266,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 245
},
{
"end": 336,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 330
},
{
"end": 445,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 424
},
{
"end": 541,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 535
},
{
"end": 628,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 618
},
{
"end": 833,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 820
},
{
"end": 867,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 859
},
{
"end": 991,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 980
},
{
"end": 1165,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1116
},
{
"end": 1326,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 1302
},
{
"end": 1436,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1424
},
{
"end": 1473,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1459
},
{
"end": 1505,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1496
}
] |
upa 1 fb-cri-wp2523-10
In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay
Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction
Criminal Writ Petition No. 2523 Of 2010
Along With
Criminal Application No. 3478 Of 2010
Criminal Writ Petition No.2523 Of 2010
Mr. Rajesh Bhalchandra Chalke )
Age : 37 years, Occupation : Business )
Indaga House, 82, Dr. Annie Basent Road )
Worli, Mumbai 400 018. ).. Petitioner
Versus
1) State of Maharashtra )
2) M/s Emco Dynatorq Pvt. Ltd. )
(Formerly known as Emco Lenze Pvt. Ltd.) )
having its office located at 1st Floor )
Sita Mauli, Above Bank of Maharashtra )
Madanlal Dhingra Road, Panch Pakhadi )
Thane (W), 400 602. ).. Respondents
Mr. S.V. Marwadi i/b Mr. S.P. Narkar for the Petitioner.
Mr. M.R. Tidke, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State.
Along With
Criminal Application No. 3478 Of 2010
1) Nikhil Vasantlal Merchant, age 48 years )
a) 347-A, Pancharatna, Opera House, M.P. Marg )
Mumbai 400 004. )
b) H-2, Breach Candy Apts., Bhulabhai Desai )
Road, Mumbai 400 026. )
upa 2 fb-cri-wp2523-10
2) Manepanda Joyappa Subbaiah )
a) 347-A, Pancharatna, Opera House, M.P. Marg )
Mumbai 400 004. )
b) 201, Skyline Apts., Langford Road, )
Shanthinagar, Bangalore, Karnataka 560025 )
3) Ashok Kumar Ram Gopal Doda )
a) 347-A, Pancharatna, Opera House, M.P. Marg )
Mumbai 400 004. )
b) A-203/204, Mt. Everest, Bhakti Park )
Wadala (East), Mumbai 400031 ).. Applicants
Versus
1) The State of Maharashtra )
2) Global Trade Finance Ltd. )
through its Registered Office situated at )
Metropolitan Building, 6th Floor, Bandra-Kurla )
Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai 400 051 ).. Respondents
Mr. Ashish Chavan for the Applicant.
Mr. Jatin Shah for the Respondent in other matter.
Mr. Yashpal Thakur i/b M/s Paras Kuhad and Associates
for Respondent No.2.
Mr. M.R. Tidke, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State.
Coram : Mohit S. Shah, C.J.,
V.M. Kanade And
Smt. R.P.Sondurbaldota, Jj.
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 142,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 108
},
{
"end": 623,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 598
},
{
"end": 986,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 966
},
{
"end": 1090,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1067
},
{
"end": 1527,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1515
},
{
"end": 1547,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1536
},
{
"end": 1593,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1583
},
{
"end": 1747,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 1722
},
{
"end": 2229,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 2203
},
{
"end": 2688,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 2662
},
{
"end": 3157,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 3137
},
{
"end": 3254,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 3229
},
{
"end": 3548,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3535
},
{
"end": 3588,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3578
},
{
"end": 3649,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3635
},
{
"end": 3737,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 3727
},
{
"end": 3838,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 3825
},
{
"end": 3900,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 3889
},
{
"end": 3965,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 3948
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
CCC.No. 1488 of 2001(S)
1. Sri.P.Damodaran
... Petitioner
Vs
1. Sri.Cherkalam Abdulla
... Respondent
For Petitioner :Sri.K.Sasikumar
For Respondent :Advocate General
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B.Koshy
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K.Basheer
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.P.Balachandran
Dated :27/03/2008
O R D E R
J.B.Koshy, A.K.Basheer & K.P.Balachandran, Jj.
------------------------------------
C.C.C.No.1488 of 2001
-------------------------------------
Dated 27th March, 2008
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 87,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 76
},
{
"end": 179,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 162
},
{
"end": 273,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 262
},
{
"end": 359,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 350
},
{
"end": 395,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 384
},
{
"end": 436,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 420
},
{
"end": 483,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 474
},
{
"end": 496,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 485
},
{
"end": 515,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 499
}
] |
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
Crl.MC.No. 2225 of 2009()
1. Dr. V.K.Vijayalekshmi Amma, Aged 70 Yrs,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. Bindu V., Aged 34 Years,
... Respondent
2. Arjun Rajagopal, Aged 8 Years,
3. State Of Kerala, Represented By
For Petitioner :Sri.C.Harikumar
For Respondent :Public Prosecutor
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.Sasidharan Nambiar
Dated :02/12/2009
O R D E R
M.Sasidharan Nambiar,J.
===========================
CRL.M.C.No. 2225 Of 2009
===========================
Dated this the 2nd day of December,2009
Order
|
[
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 99,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 77
},
{
"end": 194,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 186
},
{
"end": 274,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 259
},
{
"end": 309,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 294
},
{
"end": 375,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 364
},
{
"end": 473,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 453
},
{
"end": 540,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 520
}
] |
Case No.:
Special Leave Petition (crl.) 1971 of 1999
Petitioner:
M/S. Medchl Chemicals & Pharma P. Ltd.
Vs.
Respondent:
M/S. Biological E. Ltd. & Ors. Respondents
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 110,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 76
},
{
"end": 155,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 136
}
] |
Case No.:
Appeal (civil) 7467 of 1996
Petitioner:
K.S. Vidyanadam And Ors.
Respondent:
Vairavan
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 67,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 52
},
{
"end": 98,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 90
}
] |
Petitioner:
Mohan Lal
Vs.
Respondent:
Management Of M/S Bharat Electronics Ltd.
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 21,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 82,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 41
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
Dated: 25/11/2003
Coram
The Honourable Mr.Justice V.Kanagaraj
Criminal Original Petition No.28474 Of 2003
And
CRL.M.P.No.7883 Of 2003 .
M.G.Singaravelu ... Petitioner
-Vs-
1.The State,
rep.by The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Forest Cell Cid.,
Vellore District,
Vellore.
2.The Forest Range Officer,
Alangayam.
(O.R.37/92-93) ... Respondents
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure for the relief as stated therein.
For petitioner : Mr.G.Ethirajulu
For respondents : Mr.A.N.Thambidurai,
Govt.Advocate (crl.side)
:O R D E R
|
[
{
"end": 41,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 106,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 95
},
{
"end": 198,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 183
},
{
"end": 263,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 258
},
{
"end": 403,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 369
},
{
"end": 628,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 616
},
{
"end": 667,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 652
}
] |
Case No.:
Appeal (crl.) 719 1995
Petitioner:
N. Narsinga Rao
Vs.
Respondent:
State Of Andhra Pradesh
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 63,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 47
},
{
"end": 106,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 83
}
] |
Petitioner:
Manak Lal
Vs.
Respondent:
Dr. Prem Chand
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 21,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 55,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 45
}
] |
:1:
In The High Court Of Karnataka At Bangalore
Dated This The 13Th Day Of June 2012
Before
The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice K.N.Keshavanarayana
Miscellaneous First Appeal No.3078/2009 (Mv)
Between:
1. Smt. Leela Bai,
W/o. Shivaprasad,
42 years,
2. Vishnu Prasad,
S/o. Shivaprasad,
24 years,
3. Lalji,
S/o. Shivaprasad,
19 years,
4. Divya Bharathi,
D/o. Shivaprasad,
17 years,
All are residing at Goplapur,
Jondhra Post, Masthuri Thana,
Bhilaspur District, Chatisgarh.
4th appellant since minor represented
by 1st appellant - guardian. ... Appellants
(By Shri R.Chandrashekar, Advocate)
And:
1. The Managing Director,
B.M.T.C., Central Office,
1
:2:
K.H.Road, Double Road,
Shanthinagar, Bangalore - 27.
2. The Divisional Manager,
United India Insurance Co. Ltd.,
No.40, 1st Floor, Lakshmi Complex,
Opp. Vani Vilas Hospital,
K.R.Road, Fort,
Bangalore - 560 002. ...Respondents
(By Shri S.V.Hegde Mulkhand, Advocate for R-2
R1 notice dispensed with)
This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under
Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicle Act against the
judgment and award dated 04.10.2008 passed in
M.V.C. No.8553/2007 on the file of Judge and Member,
Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bangalore, partly
allowing the claim petition for compensation and
seeking enhancement of compensation.
This Miscellaneous First Appeal coming for
hearing on this day, the Court delivered the following: -
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 53,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 17
},
{
"end": 182,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 163
},
{
"end": 263,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 254
},
{
"end": 328,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 315
},
{
"end": 385,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 380
},
{
"end": 451,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 437
},
{
"end": 704,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 689
},
{
"end": 785,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 735
},
{
"end": 1015,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 958
},
{
"end": 1188,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1170
}
] |
33
* In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi
+ MAC.APP.No.601/2007
Date of Decision : 15th January, 2010
%
Keith Rowe ..... Appellant
Through : Mr. Rajesh Yadav and
Ms. Ruchira V. Arora, Advs.
versus
Prashant Sagar & Ors. ..... Respondent
Through : Mr. Atul Nanda and
Mr. Sanjay Bhardwaj, Advs.
for R-2.
Coram :-
The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice J.R. Midha
1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may Yes
be allowed to see the Judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes
3. Whether the judgment should be Yes
reported in the Digest?
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 51,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 19
},
{
"end": 182,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 172
},
{
"end": 289,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 277
},
{
"end": 351,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 335
},
{
"end": 404,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 390
},
{
"end": 488,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 478
},
{
"end": 540,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 525
},
{
"end": 629,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 619
}
] |
Reportable
In The Supreme Court Of India
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
Civil Appeal No. 1374 of 2008
Union of India
....Appellant
Versus
Ibrahim Uddin & Anr.
....Respondents
J U D G M E N T
|
[
{
"end": 64,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 42
},
{
"end": 250,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 179
},
{
"end": 347,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 317
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature For Rajasthan At Jaipur Bench, Jaipur
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12656/2014
Chhotu Ram & Another - Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan & Others - RESPONDENTSDate of Judgment -::- 25th February, 2015.
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi
Mr. Paras Kuhad Senior Counsel with
Mr. Pradeep Choudhary, for the petitioners.
Mr. P.S. Narsimha, Asg, with
Mr. Rajendra Prasad, Aag, for the respondent-State.
Mr. S.K. Gupta, Aag for the respondent Jda.
Reportable
Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 69,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 120,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 110
},
{
"end": 170,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 152
},
{
"end": 281,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 266
},
{
"end": 299,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 288
},
{
"end": 342,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 325
},
{
"end": 384,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 371
},
{
"end": 416,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 401
},
{
"end": 465,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 455
}
] |
Case No.:
Appeal (civil) 5124 of 2004
Petitioner:
R.M. Yellatti
Respondent:
The Asst. Executive Engineer
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 65,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 52
},
{
"end": 111,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 87
}
] |
Case No.:
Appeal (civil) 490 of 2008
Petitioner:
Premkumari & Ors
Respondent:
Prahlad Dev & Ors
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 61,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 51
},
{
"end": 92,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 81
}
] |
In The High Court Of Judicature At Patna
Criminal Appeal (Db) No.760 of 2009
Arising Out of Ps. Case No. -47 Year- 2005 Thana -Mokama District- Patna
(Against the judgment dated 29.06.2009/30.06.2009
passed by Additional District & Sessions Judge-XIII,
Patna in Sessions Trial No. 209 of 2008/40 of 2009,
arising out of Mokama P.S. Case No. 47 dated
11.04.2005)
===========================================================
Gyan Ravi Das @ Gyan Prakash, S/o Hari Ravidas, R/o- Chandi Brindavan, P.S.- Sheikhapur, District- Sheikhpura at present of Doghara, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna.
.... .... Appellant Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant : Mr. Rama Kant Sharma, Sr. Advocate.
Mr. Binod Murari Mishra, Advocate.
Mr. Prem Kumar, Advocate.
For the State : Mr. Ashwani Kumar Sinha, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. K.M.Joseph, Advocate.
Mr. Hemant Kumar, Advocate.
=========================================================== Coram: Honourable Mr. Justice V.N. Sinha and Honourable Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha C.A.V. Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 527,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 499
},
{
"end": 710,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 696
},
{
"end": 845,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 829
},
{
"end": 887,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 868
},
{
"end": 916,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 906
},
{
"end": 969,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 950
},
{
"end": 1012,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1002
},
{
"end": 1043,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 1031
},
{
"end": 1157,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1147
},
{
"end": 1202,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 1185
}
] |
1 Crl.RP 404/08
In The High Court Of Karnataka At Bangalore
T
20
Dated This The Day Of April, 2012
Before:
The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice A.S. Pachhapure
Criminal Revision Petition No.404 Of 2008
Between:
Ajith Balse,
Aged about 65 years,
Sb. Mohan Pal Singh,
Managing Director,
M/s. East Export Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd.,
A/20, Midc, Patala Ganga,
Raighad District,
Maharashtra--410 220. ... Petitioner/S
[By Sri. G. Jeevaprakash &
Sri. Prasanna V.R., Advs.)
And:
Capt. Ranga Karkere,
Aged about 51 years,
Sb. Chenga Kendwer,
Managing Partner,
Yermal Fish Traders,
Surinal [First) Processing Unit,
Yermal Tenka,
Udupi Taluk & District. ... Respondent/S
[By Sri. P.P. Hegde, Adv.)
***
This Crl.R.P. is filed u/Section 397 r/w. 401
Cr.P.C. praying to set aside the Judgment/Order dt.
7.3.2008 passed by S.J., Udupi District, Udupi, in
Crl.A. No.52/07 and set aside the conviction Order
dated 22.03.07 in C.C. No.(4700/07) passed by the I
7D0/ 02*
*rr*cf vide Cou. t Order
datd 11.06.2012.
----
/
2 Crl.RP 404/08
Addi. C.J. [Jr. Dn.] & Jmfc., Udupi District, Udupi
and acquit the petitioner.
This Crl.R.P. having been heard and reserved
for Orders, this day the Court pronounced the
following:
Order
|
[
{
"end": 86,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 50
},
{
"end": 304,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 283
},
{
"end": 379,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 368
},
{
"end": 631,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 616
},
{
"end": 657,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 644
},
{
"end": 693,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 680
},
{
"end": 913,
"label": "LAWYER",
"start": 900
}
] |
Petitioner:
Associated Hotels Of India Ltd.
Vs.
Respondent:
R. N. Kapoor
Date Of Judgment
|
[
{
"end": 43,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 75,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 63
}
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.