text
stringlengths 7
5k
| degree_of_toxicity
float64 0
1
| contains_offensive_word
int64 0
1
| label
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|
@user Hahaha the goofball is losing money and is still to dumb to know why.. | 0.789576 | 1 | 1 |
OMG RT @shuggajets: “@iAintAsianTho: when yo side bitch find the gift you bought for ya girl http://t.co/InzEzV9a1n” LMFAOOOOOOOO | 0.910363 | 1 | 1 |
Response
So I'm sure you're a really nice guy, but it looks like you're adding the tags not because of the the article needing a cleanup and reorganizing but just because the color scheme of the column boxes are not the color scheme of original boxes and are matching the Roc Nation colors and of the logo.
That is just plain out bias it not my fault that other people do not do this when creating a record label singles discography, which they can and you have not seen one with a color scheme on them. All I have done is put the 3 basic colors Black, Red and White of Roc Nation on a original Wikipedia column to distinguish it from other record label singles discography and the other names of the artists that are on the article, because the article would grow as those and more artist release more singles and songs, which makes it appropriate and not inappropriate as you have stated for you reason of adding cleanup/reorganize tags. Once again all I did is add 3 basic colors to the original columns Black, Red and White which anybody can do on any other record label discographies on Wikipedia, but I may have been the first to do this new color scheme styling of a record label singles discography that does not mean you just add tags that are not meant to be on a specific article that is formatted, organized and written like any other record label singles discographies on Wikipedia and is fully verified.
There is no Wikipedia rule that says this is not justified for a record label singles discography except for you , I'm sure you're a really nice guy, but this just plain bias, which Wikipedia does not condone from established editors or administrators. | 0.000772 | 0 | 0 |
primeval creatures page
Its been nominated for deletion and we need votes in order to save it. | 0.000791 | 0 | 0 |
RACIST ACTIONS
DO NOT DELETE PAGES YOU KNOW NOTHING OF!!! YOU HAVE NO REAL RIGHTS!!! RACIST! | 0.916442 | 1 | 1 |
The page is not protected for registered users, so i don't care | 0.037216 | 0 | 0 |
I've more than doubled my edits and made sure to add edit summaries to my non-vandalism reverts (which was mentioned in my first) since my last request. Is this still really not enough for the rollback permission? talk | 0.000623 | 0 | 0 |
Shall we delete the discussion page then? I shouldn't say this, but I don't like me and my friends getting neglected. And just know no one can be a part of the flc management even though you are Jonathan Block!!! 87.209.195.148 | 0.085533 | 0 | 0 |
i think if my girlfriend were to get locked up shed be the first one raped. #pussy | 0.991578 | 1 | 1 |
. Now get back to looking at Raw guest hosts and other childish wrestling topics. You make me sick - a grown man devoting his life to watching basted men in pants pretending to scrap. Did you enjoy watching Randy Orton's glistening belly button and atomic wedgie last week? It's f**king amoebas like you that have kept this most pathetic excuse for entertainment going for all these years - it should have died when all the redknecks finally found out it wasn't real. How this can still be a viable business in this day and age? But when there's enough 'people' with flea brains so abysmal to sit there editing Wikipedia most minutes of the day, it's no real f**king surprise. | 0.760559 | 1 | 1 |
"
Gladly! You can expect some feedback sometime this evening. (Also, what an ambitious undertaking!) drop me a line (note: not a bot!) " | 0.000602 | 0 | 0 |
RT @Jamilaahhh: These hoes be twerkin for Birkin, poppin coochie for Gucci, bustin wide for that Prada, Bendin over for Louis | 0.383241 | 1 | 1 |
“@leynachristina: I'm driving myself insane.”fag | 0.520755 | 1 | 1 |
"@Shun_stokes: 😂😂😂😂RT @bluprint_4: Lmao! This bitch come scooting in the tent like she about to fuck some shit up!" 😭😭😭 | 0.997225 | 1 | 1 |
Leave it up to Ronson to make my ass laugh when I'm heated.... Fucking bitch ... | 0.997125 | 1 | 1 |
"
Edit War
This was uncalled-for entirely. Are you accusing me of edit warring for a single edit? If anything even remotely qualifies, it'd be your revert. You wrote (to refresh your memory): ""please don't edit-war over a wikiproject tag; the article references Kinsey and Okami, that's plenty good enough reason to include the PAW project tag"".
I can see your intent with the Kinsey reference (but that'd be like placing a Homosexuality tag on the page too since he researched that also). I'll leae the tag because, while the connection is highly peripheral at best, it was - in spite of your bordering-on-bad-faith-personal attack above, added back in good faith. Seemes to me it was originally added, framing this in the best light possible, in error.
You and your little posse need to realize that not everything you see involving children or involving a naked body is pedophilia or even wrong. This article, Nudity and children, has nothing to do with pedophilia, nothing to do with sex at all, but you seem to see it that way. Why is that?
But again, the good-faith (barely holding on to that assumption with your comments) I accept, even if misguided. Just please don't go off the deep end like that again; it's tiring. • • • 14:33 (UTC) 27 Mar '08" | 0.018043 | 0 | 0 |
Edit request from , 8 October 2011
Please remove {{pp-semi-indef}} from line two, so that this doesn't appear at Category:Wikipedia pages with incorrect protection templates.
(talk | ) | 0.000589 | 0 | 0 |
I feel your pain
It is very frustrating. I don't know believe there will ever be a solution. It is an ancient legacy. 01:32, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC) | 0.00211 | 0 | 0 |
"
Besides this article so meager and ""superstitious"" that it seems like it has been input by a mason. It should be based on solid theories and facts, moreover the links given after the claims should supply the exact information about the theory claimed if not it does not represent any value but a jester figure. ( )." | 0.001289 | 0 | 0 |
Sure, I'll look it over. I don't know much about the neo-imperialism thing though. | 0.000607 | 0 | 0 |
alignment on this subject and which are contrary to those of DuLithgow | 0.001001 | 0 | 0 |
"
Aztec society
Gidday Richard, I note that you've swapped some text about between Aztec society and Daily life in the Aztec Empire articles. I think it's fine to rationalise the arrangement on these topics, however I have some reservations about the latter of these two articles. It was one of a brace of Aztec and Maya articles (see for eg Mayan Trade, Mayan Food) all created around the same time in September by about 4 or 5 first-time editors, and they all have the hallmark of coming from some more extensive essay on the subject area. I'm not saying that there's copyvio involved here, my guess would be that it's almost like some joint class assignment has been broken up into separate articles. They are based on reasonable material, but they contain a number of evident misinterpretations and have more of a school essay feel to them. They need considerable work and rearranging, and in some instances I really wonder whether it is worth the effort as they cut across topics already covered in the main Aztec/Maya articles.
Just so as you know and something to bear in mind if distributing their contents across other articles. The images which came with the Daily Life article are also I believe mis-tagged as the contributor's own work, when clearly they seem to be taken from elsewhere. Anyways, keep up the good work, and cheers | TALK " | 0.000584 | 0 | 0 |
Pound of flesh
If you are not after a pound of flesh, then stop behaving as if you are. Your lobbing for sanctions on ChrisO is unlikely to shed any light on the matter; it is only intensifying the dispute. I've noted this at User talk:Dougweller. Talk | 0.053281 | 0 | 0 |
These bitches always trippin | 0.990302 | 1 | 1 |
@user Hysterical women and she men by the looks of it | 0.273799 | 1 | 1 |
And I am glad to see that the good doctor has started working on such important articles such as 69 Sexy Things 2 Do Before You Die. | 0.179909 | 1 | 0 |
Ne-Yo
Hi. Thanks for dropping by. The citation is actually in one of the refs used, but it only mentioned briefly that Ne-Yo has a baby, no further info. Seems like its a secret baby of sort, as claimed by some not-so-reliable sources. If I can't find an in-depth article about his personal life, I'll mention the baby briefly. I'll try to improve/beef up the article's content, if I have enough time. I'll keep you posted. | 0.00065 | 0 | 0 |
RT @GoatRapLines: When Wale said.....nvm that nigga trash | 0.924357 | 1 | 1 |
cunt. I hate your face. You are a fucking shit faced wanker. | 0.998181 | 1 | 1 |
she's a nazi apparently | 0.91794 | 1 | 1 |
"
Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mohi_Richard_Toko&diff;=prev&oldid;=351283535, you will be blocked for vandalism. " | 0.000724 | 0 | 0 |
RT @SKINNY_NiggaDoe: RT @HoodrichKeem: Leave the bitching to the bitches ! | 0.99373 | 1 | 1 |
"=Please do not edit user pages==
Please do not edit others' user pages. This is considered vandalism. — দ 23:26, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!! == POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!! == POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!! == POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!! == POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
POLITCAL PIGGY !!!
= | 0.146698 | 1 | 0 |
ANTI SEMITISM AT WIKIPEDIA
Come chat with my friends on Facebook | 0.004803 | 0 | 0 |
If you can't be civil then you should not be on here. Tide rolls, there is absolutely no reason for you to repeat what I've just stated. If you are not going to add anything constructive than you need not post. I, not you, have already called for discussion. This discussion is meant to last a few days. Please do not go about repeating others. It simply confuses readers | 0.000711 | 0 | 0 |
- I don't have an attitude. But to delete an article that was just barely created does not seem to meet the spirit of Wikipedia. I know you've probably contributed to thousands of articles, and I'm just a part timer, but geez, have some patience. | 0.008333 | 0 | 0 |
"
I'm giving you the opportunity to be unblocked. Please see the note at User talk:GrandMariner. — (say whaaat?!) " | 0.001204 | 0 | 0 |
"
Fleet Foxes Album
Hi, you removed the Robert Christgau review for not being ""informative"". The thing is that every time an album recieves a dud (the ""bomb) it means that it was so bad it doesn't need much further thoughts about it, here you can find all the information. For example please see the Review Robert Christgau gave the Black Keys' album Attack & Release, if you go to the website of the review you will see that all the albums that recieved a dud have no more lines dedicated to it. I hope I'm able to restore my contribution now, regards." | 0.000579 | 0 | 0 |
:User:Oms3
A tag has been placed on User:Oms3, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of User:Oms3 and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. | 0.000603 | 0 | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:Final Round - World War II miniatures wargame | 0.000677 | 0 | 0 |
"
i prefer to be called ""it"", you gender-specific sexist whore." | 0.978397 | 1 | 1 |
RT @__Junebugg: @VoiceOfDStreetz hell yea save money like a hoe | 0.740727 | 1 | 1 |
"
First off, you should not edit the list templates directly, as the bot will ignore any changes. Also, you cannot use vertical pipes anywhere in the syntax other than in separating the template name, the section name, and the reason, otherwise everything messes up. In place, use .
(From the yellow box at the top of my talk page - ""If I've left you a message on your talk page, I will watch it for your response, so please reply there."")
I am aware that the Bot usually overwrites manual edits - as I said, I spent hours trying to figure out why following the instructions listed on the RFC page weren't producing the results they should have. But when I saw that you had manually edited the list templates, I thought perhaps you had disabled the Bot until it was working properly.
Basically you're telling me the syntax that is commonly used throughout Wikipedia, vertical piping, is not valid within the RFC templates? That's messed up. What's even more messed up is the total lack of user instructions that mention that restriction. This has become a nightmare of a process. " | 0.000883 | 0 | 0 |
Ooh, do you feel powerful. Dealt with accordingly indeed. We only have a different perspective on something that happened at the club. You really need to come down a peg or three and speak instead of trying to come over as a badass | 0.264865 | 1 | 1 |
Shall I add the question mark or can you simply imagine one in your sympathetic brain? | 0.05277 | 0 | 0 |
This page should not be speedy deleted because...
This page should not be speedy deleted because... (i removed user information) | 0.000905 | 0 | 0 |
RT @MarijuanaPosts: Ever leave me around your bitch I’mma get her stoned. | 0.995587 | 1 | 1 |
RT @CuhCuhCuh: fat bitches dont like liftin up they arms in the summer all that dampness cuh | 0.981443 | 1 | 1 |
"
Edit summary
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled ""Edit summary"" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you." | 0.00053 | 0 | 0 |
"List of hoolie firms // Denmark ==
Hello. Removing mentions of firms such as Southside United (one of the original firms in Denmark) that actually is mentioned in the source, albeit misspelled ""South Side United"" by some scummy journalist cunt who's research probably was two coppers and a google search, while keeping Blue Front which could be seen as their youth group, as well as Squad 92 which ALSO is mentioned in the source article, does not make any sense whatsoever. Removing CC Youth Division could make a bit more sense, but the group is also mentioned in the article, though as Young Boys which simply is an old name. So please, stop your amateurish source-checks, where you remove firms that actually are mentioned in the given sources and are generally a fucking cunt. Thank you in advance.
== " | 0.346259 | 1 | 1 |
What the pork.
Why in the tunneling heck do people use this in cartoons? 67.174.105.246 | 0.039432 | 0 | 0 |
Neither of those edits were vandalism and they should not have been reverted by you. Both articles should be deleted and are ridiculous entries in wikipedia. Also please have enough respect to sign your comments to my talk page. 24.235.129.212 | 0.014044 | 0 | 0 |
Famous women be the biggest hoes. | 0.89123 | 1 | 1 |
@MsKeeKee90s yh I did niggah yh that shyt dope trust me fam .. | 0.929513 | 1 | 1 |
"
Bam. It's on.►''''''Holla! " | 0.002357 | 0 | 0 |
Lmao this bitch. | 0.993725 | 1 | 1 |
"
What's up?
Hi! I want to ask why did you say that you are reluctant to vote for anything that I vote for? I have never met you, crossed words with you, offended you or even heard about you prior to this.
I was a little surprised to see that message on the McGuiver vote page, although not upset, just surprised, because I haven't the singlest clue as why you'd feel that way.
God bless you!
Sincerely yours,
"""" 2:26, (MST), Nov 25, 2004
Nothing other than that I don't really care for you as a user, no offence. Sorry. 10:07, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)" | 0.001248 | 0 | 0 |
^No it wasn't. Wtf. | 0.645802 | 1 | 1 |
and shape of radicals | 0.000843 | 0 | 0 |
I wanted to let you know that Tymon.r. is a stupid moron. | 0.98622 | 1 | 1 |
RT @JosephTheFlyGuy: This bitch got a real life hippo as a pet http://t.co/wU6jItcE0U | 0.975758 | 1 | 1 |
RT @Ilovebamf: Like no bitch you didn't make the cut.👋💁 | 0.981696 | 1 | 1 |
FINE
CUNT FUCK FAGGOT JIZZ BITCH CUNT WHORE SHIT ASSHOLE FUCKING RETARTED ASS WIPING MUTHER FUCKER!!!
YOU PIECE OF FUCKING CUNT SHIT!!! | 0.999036 | 1 | 1 |
You may not remove vandal-warnings from your talk page. You may, if you so wish, archive them along with your other messages but the archive must be clearly linked to and the warnings not be singled out for archiving. + (t) | 0.000684 | 0 | 0 |
"
Ask me to stop? He's the one harassing me. He is being uncooperative, not agreeing to any of the compromises that I have put forth. He has even gone so far as to accuse me of harrassment, so I will not harass him anymore. I will instead just assume that he has bad faith. (give him tirade • check out damage) " | 0.016584 | 0 | 0 |
Damn change change niccas | 0.495367 | 1 | 1 |
Fuck! "Hostess to liquidate if Bakers’ strike continues through Thursday; end of Twinkies..." - http://t.co/gtWmJmGT | 0.989448 | 1 | 1 |
@alexisxisabel death to attention hoes | 0.922967 | 1 | 1 |
Apologise David, I stopped by to let you know - I'd assumed you'd seen the post on the arb case proposed decision talk, or village pump. Regards | 0.000526 | 0 | 0 |
Ah, sorry, my mistake. I haven't been on wiki much lately, but it's been resolved. Thank you | 0.000582 | 0 | 0 |
I don't know if TMZ is a reliable source, but they have her police report listed on the website with her date of birth listed as 12/8/1982. | 0.000648 | 0 | 0 |
I said nothing about Redwatch. What I said was that it is not reasonable to compare Harry's Place to it, and that no significant body of opinion has done so. No use making the argument here. You go out and find a significant body of opinion and the article can report their opinion. That's really all there is to say on the matter. . fys aym. | 0.000865 | 0 | 0 |
Did you see that I crossed it out? Typical selective use of facts, you lying filth. | 0.73545 | 1 | 1 |
EXCIRIAL YOU ARE A JOKE - DO NOT PISS ME OFF REMOVE THE BLOCK | 0.933134 | 1 | 1 |
Sensual Pleasures of the MindItalic text
There are endless creative ways to provoke and capture sensual feelings. Money can’t buy it, you can’t see it or hold it, outer
packaging offers no competition for it and no grandiose flash of materialistic presence can incite it. Sensuality in it’s truest sense can only be felt within. It is provoked by and through the power and brilliance of the mind. It is born there and lives there.
Since it is a feeling rather than a physical event, it is more difficult to achieve and maintain than might be found with other less deeply rooted sexual experiences. Knowledge, intuition and creativity are the tools necessary to discover where it lives and how to awaken it, what it takes to stimulate it and how to nurture it so it will grow. A conscientious partner can create a need and cravings simply by using the power of the mind.
All of this offers new meaning to the old adage about the mind being a terrible thing to waste. There are hot spots in the psyche that can be triggered by suggestion and connection. (Emotional Buttons) Pushing those buttons engenders our partner's sensory and sexual experience. We do this by using one type of energy to spark another and by channeling emotional reactions into sexuality. Where the adventure leads is limited only by the knowledge, intuition and creativity an individual possesses. Nothing is written in stone and there is no list of how to’s. It’s freelance flight.
Knowledge is power! Getting to know your partner and what makes her/him tick and tingle is the first step. The ability to
unearth these secret treasures comes from paying close attention to things you say or do that result in an action or reaction
indicating you have your finger on a button (hot spot). Finding all of those buttons, exploring the endless possibilities and
discovering the wondrous places they lead, takes patience and thought, but the rewards are immeasurable.
Having well honed intuition is a valuable asset. Liken it, if you will, to a good quarter back with a natural talent for reading the defense. If you ‘know’ what your partner needs, wants and desires without her/him having to explain it all, then you hold a powerful advantage. Possessing a good base knowledge of the opposite sex, in general, offers a continual win, win proposition
Being gifted with a creative imagination or obtaining skills in this arena will offer many positives for a lasting and pleasurable sex life. Desires and cravings are born in the mind and live there so it would make sense to use the power of the mind to it fullest to gain the greatest results. Spice and adventure are two major factors in all sexual experiences. If they are not on the top of your list of priorities then they should be. Avoiding boredom is key in creating cravings for more. If it wasn't good the first time, why would anyone want to repeat it? Taking your partner to a place where she/he has never been before and making each experience a lasting memory should be primary goals. That is the stuff heroes are made of.
Sexual stimulation can be achieved and sustained through physical manipulation, sexual pleasures, or through mind play and manipulation A physical presence, a verbal exchange, a mere mental/emotional connection or any combination of all of the above can create an ‘altered mental state’, a place of arousal and euphoria.
Sensual/erotic tasks and journals are great avenues to maintain altered states. Rituals and sensual tasks , while away from your
partner can help keep the buttons pushed, the bond strong, keep the connection flowing and offer sexual stimulation on an
ongoing basis. Keeping your partner in an ‘altered state’ often and for as long as possible will help in creating cravings and lead to a path ultimate sexual pleasure.
Altered states....
1-Sexuality.....intensely 'turned on' riding a sexual high ...erotica.....consumed by passion
2-Endorphin high...... an altered state resulting from physical or intense mental stimulation.
3-Euphoria.....totally absorbed in your partner and the sensations and feelings being created.
5-Head space......spellbound/entranced..lost in the release of control..total freedom and flight..to be absorbed in the trust and acceptance..a peaceful place
6-Nirvana......meditative state.....heightened consciousness with loss of awareness.....having a sense of self through 'losing oneself'......total freedom through total loss of control.
All sexual experiences need to be consensual and remain safe. | 0.001844 | 0 | 0 |
And now lookin ass niggas and lookin ass bitches will be the terms of 2014. Will be overused & abused in every fucking way | 0.998525 | 1 | 1 |
Hi! I am back again!
Last warning!
Stop undoing my edits or die! | 0.863642 | 1 | 1 |
RT @BrosConfessions: "If you are nice girls, they will be bitches to you. If you are an asshole, girls will want your dick. #womanlogic" | 0.996425 | 1 | 1 |
RT @ThadIsReal: Ladies If a nigga always wanna go out and party every weekend . He basically side hoe shopping | 0.880199 | 1 | 1 |
"
Sorry, I am new at this. I guess my contention with the block was
that there was not a consensus on the talk page regarding the issue at hand and that the external link in question deserved to be on to preserve a NPOV. If not overturned I accept the punishment and will continue the ""edit war"" on the talk page." | 0.000587 | 0 | 0 |
SEE YOU IN PERSON, I'M GOING TO FUCK YOU UP BIG TIME. | 0.99439 | 1 | 1 |
How u know u dont get real life pussy. Only carin bout her enterin your DMs
RT @J0MAEL: She can enter my DMs anytime http://t.co/nZ74WBsDBH | 0.969342 | 1 | 1 |
Duchess of Windsor
There seem to be things happening all the time in location of Wallis, Duchess of Windsor. And check also Talk:Wallis, Duchess of Windsor | 0.000567 | 0 | 0 |
These are by figures released from the Heart and Stroke foundation that points to Chatham-Kent being a hot spot for coronary artery disease... | 0.000663 | 0 | 0 |
Scrappy got the hoes 🐸☕️.. It's 3 of em on stage I wonder how many in the audience | 0.01246 | 0 | 1 |
Fuck of u mother fucker..Rajputs were the kings and they just gave repect to brahmins dosent mean brahmins were strong..the ruler were rajputs..the decision makers were rajputs..the fighters were rajputs..
And wat about parshurama..i tell u he aslo conceded his defeat to lord rama who was a survanshiya Kshatriya rajput..
U get lost .. | 0.998485 | 1 | 1 |
Ante Perkovic:
What is your MSN? | 0.000855 | 0 | 0 |
@Z_MEGA fasho fasho .. Hurry ya ass up nicca | 0.992793 | 1 | 1 |
Bonaparte, Lucien Louis Joseph Napoleon | 0.001305 | 0 | 0 |
RT @bebalizz123: Bagging thot bitches & giving 'em head? Ew nigga you nasty & you're better off dead. | 0.996073 | 1 | 1 |
You allege that I am a reincarnation of various past IPs.
Okay, would you please list all of them that you allege? If there are false positives, I will point out how they are false. If they are true (and you may express why you suspect said IPs are formerly mine, if you wish), then I will admit it.
Thanks, 70.179.174.63 | 0.000657 | 0 | 0 |
Good job not covering the point, your bouncing from WP:EL statement to statement and failing is documented above, if you have new objections please present them. Perhaps less crying over edit summaries and actually addressing guidelines would help. | 0.000575 | 0 | 0 |
"
Pre-Indo-European?
I will edit statement identifying Hittite and Egyptian as Pre-Indo-European languages. Consensus places Hittite in the Indo-European family without any ""pre"", and Egyptian belongs to the Afro-Asiatic family. If Wittman proposed alternate hypotheses that should have been made clear in the article. " | 0.000626 | 0 | 0 |
ur the biggest gay
hello from face punched | 0.955083 | 1 | 1 |
NO!
No I told you to stop! Just leave me alone! I will do whatever and i will come back no matter what!!!!!!!!!!
173.51.203.228 | 0.113801 | 1 | 0 |
Damn bitch thnx http://t.co/TwDKCKKTaz | 0.997062 | 1 | 1 |
RT @ImTooMuch: Trent Richardson so trash | 0.849113 | 1 | 1 |
By the way, I direct all interested editors to the first section on this page, which SatyrTN has tried (unsuccessfully) to archive before consensus. There, you will see many other editors' responses to these same arguments, which SatyrTN was also making three months ago. | 0.00057 | 0 | 0 |
"
replies
Thank you so much for the barnstar, I appreciate it! It means a lot coming from you, but you are much more deserving of one!
As for the water, I chose that because I've had problem finding the proper article myself. I was doing a chemistry assignment and the regular Water article wasn't as comprehensive as Water (properties). But then I found out we even had articles on Water_(data_page) and Color of water, which would have been very helpful had I known they existed.
But we also don't have an outline for water, so it may be better to demo a well developed outline. If you have any good ideas, just go ahead and change it as you see fit. " | 0.000513 | 0 | 0 |
Thanks
Thanks for the welcome. And thanks for link to join WP:BDC.
Regards | 0.00052 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.