text
stringlengths 7
5k
| degree_of_toxicity
float64 0
1
| contains_offensive_word
int64 0
1
| label
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|
U FAT PENIS< LISTEN HERE! | 0.994527 | 1 | 1 |
And dis shit is for the birds 2 http://t.co/o1pKDhYAX9 | 0.924657 | 1 | 1 |
I feel like slapping a bitch | 0.991501 | 1 | 1 |
Does Wikipedia have an agreement with the V&A;? | 0.000905 | 0 | 0 |
I'll walk away with your money and leave a tip for your bitch | 0.994402 | 1 | 1 |
"
Use of Field hockey
It is standard here on wikipedia no matter what event it is to list if its ice or field hockey. See [ TalkContributions " | 0.000595 | 0 | 0 |
Hello
This message is regarding the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pete Holly. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. I've replaced the missing votes and reinstated your comment. | 0.000602 | 0 | 0 |
@XNastyy Lol you probably right. Fuck you bitch !! *in spanish* | 0.998035 | 1 | 1 |
Why do not the two of you, the mentally retarded Jennygirl and the omnipotent Richie Rich, go together to Harrods and dont forget to choose together, being an authentically healthy and sociable couple, time and location, maybe a restaurant,and then enjoy very evidentliy your meal and in case you should discover that you cant pay anymore, then do not expect them to let one of you peel the potatoes in return. Maybe they wont even say Hello when you come back after they would be kicking off your dipshit spinning incapable ass from the central perk. What a pity. Receive all my sympathy at one time. Enjoy yourselves and your longest sentence Johnny-come-lately the one and only programme director. | 0.846591 | 1 | 1 |
I saw her for the first time on the Daily Show last week. Oh my freaking god..that woman is fucking HOT!!!! | 0.993945 | 1 | 1 |
Removal of Britain from Great power list
I propose a discussion for a constructive argument for the removal of Britain from the great power list. I invite all to take part in it. We can do it over this week and the next. But let's all make it constructive with valid arguments and sources. Thank you. | 0.00057 | 0 | 0 |
", 4 September 2014 (UTC) | decline = You won't be unblocked unless you agree to stop trying to create a page about your organization, per WP:COI. Talk 15:37" | 0.000612 | 0 | 0 |
Will you help me rephrase my comment as a civil criticism? Since you're like, a professional Wikipedia contributor or some shit? (bahahaha...bet that pays real well, huh??) Basically, in my civil criticism, I'd like to communicate that this Tgeairn douche bag is a huge ass hat, he wastes his life on this punchline of a website playing hall monitor. It's like he wasn't loved as a child, or wasn't cool enough (?) to be a hall monitor as a kid. I'd also like to express how he enjoys making love to various domesticated and non-domesticated animals on a regular basis, and also spills his seed on other Wikipedia poindexters every once in a while. As a professional Wikipedia user (bahahahahahahha!) can you help me, a n00b, express this as part of a civil criticism? I'd really like this Tgeairn ass hat to feel really bad about his life choices as a result, that's my goal. Thanks Tgeairn! | 0.621192 | 1 | 1 |
"
Ultimatum - noun, a final demand or statement of terms, the rejection of which will result in retaliation or a breakdown in relations. So you want some specific person to put their foot down, and demand something of you, otherwise they'll throw a hissy-fit? Weird. Who is this person you're referring to? By the way, if you read the previous sections instead of just starting new ones every few hours you'll see that this question has come up before several times... just to be ignored by you. Propose this section be removed per wp:TALK (""Deleting material not relevant to improving the article (per the above subsection #How to use article talk pages)"" is permitted). Stop creating new discussion sections with new topics as soon as someone replies to you. " | 0.011372 | 0 | 0 |
RT @TittyFlex: Lol I don't need Halloween to dress like a ho. I know myself. Everyday is another opportunity. | 0.021862 | 0 | 1 |
What's retarded is that I actually love my job and have a really weird passion for it. | 0.321697 | 1 | 1 |
If only everyone knew the real you...fakest bitch I know | 0.98683 | 1 | 1 |
Dryvyng
I've added some material on Dryvyng, Brittain & Trahain's new venture, as well as giving a redirect for that term here, as it is getting coverage and that coverage is largely within the context of IsAnybodyDown; beyond the example used as reference, you can also see that this Business Insider article both opens and ends with invocation of that website. | 0.000564 | 0 | 0 |
good dick tattoos bitches like dat... talk to dem any kind of way the bitches like dat... | 0.997931 | 1 | 1 |
"
I take some exception to what you're saying, Xander, though I agree with it in bulk. While there is artistic licence for an heraldic artist to interpret the blazon broadly, I am not at all familiar with any convention allowing for adding embellishments. Can you please provide a reference for same? I am completely unaware of any convention which allows an heraldic artist to add elements that are not described in the blazon. The arms are the blazon, period, and nothing more or less. Beyond My Ken, perhaps a better way to explain this to you... you think the representation of the arms is what matters, yes? That is not in fact the case. Blazons are much more like recipes; Mrs Fields has a single recipe for e.g. their chocolate chip cookie. That is the important thing. Anyone, possessing the recipe, could make a reasonable facsimile thereof. So there's that.
However, this is all fairly abstruse heraldic knowledge which not a lot of people know, which gives us the problem you are having; you feel that presenting a given cookie as a Mrs Fields cookie is inappropriate unless it was actually made by Mrs Fields. In one sense, you're right, but you're only right out of totally understandable ignorance of how heraldry works.
All that being said, it is true that there are 'official' coats of arms inasmuch as they are the ones approved for use by the holder of the arms. For example, the representation of the Arms of Canada currently in use has been personally approved by The Queen and is thus 'official' for government use.
And with all of that being said: the reference in question does not support the adornments added to the image. It supports only the blazon, and any depiction which follows only the blazon is both heraldically correct and properly sourced. → ₪
" | 0.00063 | 0 | 0 |
Much better. I've made a few more changes, to eliminate similarities in wording (and to remove passive voice). Thanks for your hard work on this! | 0.000598 | 0 | 0 |
"
It doesn't matter if National is #1 or #37; here at Wikipedia, the linkspam policy clearly discourages the posting of commercial links on a ""generic"" page like the voltage regulator page. Sometimes, if the list of manufacturers isn't long, it's accepted if all of the relevant players are linked, but there are just too many vendors of VR chips, bricks, etc.
I believe it is entirely reasonable to remove the NatSemi link.
" | 0.000627 | 0 | 0 |
You're missing the point of these re-editting, many do agree with removing the picture with the old one, you should think about how others feel about this too, not just me who thinks someone is being racist through biasness, or the person moxy who requested you to block me. You may have the right to block me for accusing people, but you have no right from blocking others who refuse this picture for their own reasons. I guarantee you I won't be the only one who is unhappy about these pics, especially Asian men who won't feel happy about this. HOW THE HELL CAN YOU CALL THAT ANATOMICAL FEATURES when you can't seen see the guys penis??? ( And yes, I know Asian men are know for having smaller ones but not that tiny, that guy has an malfunction syndrome penis). WarriorsPride6565 (talk) (talk • contribs) 7:41, 12 march (UTC) | 0.76839 | 1 | 1 |
@MotherOfBraylon you already know they go to fed for me ah bitch be ready to walk out the door 😂😂✌️ | 0.983777 | 1 | 1 |
"quote==
SlimVirgin wrote ""But I feel that FuelWagon and Duckecho are POV pushing too by insisting, for example, that no dissenting voice be heard in the intro.""
Although I told SlimVirgin I never said any such nonsense, he has to date not apologized for such a gross distortion of facts. " | 0.000817 | 0 | 0 |
"
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. – T | C | E " | 0.000803 | 0 | 0 |
RT @peaceloveweed_: These hoes want my belvita http://t.co/DCVveTxeQ1 | 0.241463 | 1 | 1 |
If i'm blocked for this edit, that admin has no balls, no life || J.delanoy is an imbecilic bootkissing social-inept. Pwned me? I will return again and again to haunt your ass!
you suck
nuff' said
ha
ha
ha | 0.996374 | 1 | 1 |
RT @metroadlib: Amanda wants Fizz to protect her.
This dude told yo ass on MULTIPLE occasions to let this bitch be. | 0.986687 | 1 | 1 |
To Thank you for your offer. I am no expert on this field, but might be able to write a decent piece with a help from my friend and sources I have gathered so far. Would be glad if you could proof-read and revise my writings. I just hope the two editors who have opposed me will agree to you too. | 0.000535 | 0 | 0 |
Recusing
Are you sure that was in the right section and should have been under Arbitrators views where Steve Smith recused? You haven't signed it either. | 0.000651 | 0 | 0 |
I need some new hoes | 0.342771 | 1 | 1 |
"@DreadheadAri: she really asked me that dead ass serious tho, all i could say was "bitch wheet" LOL | 0.967606 | 1 | 1 |
:M&A; Today
A tag has been placed on M&A; Today, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. | 0.000596 | 0 | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:Carlos Campos Silva | 0.000618 | 0 | 0 |
Third party sources
The article failed the GA review, although it was a bit premature in my view and I would have preferred it if the admin who initially indicated that he would review the article had been allowed to have his say.
Anyway, one thing that is clear from the review is that there are too many references from the subject's work, and that a clutch of third-party sources are needed to redress this balance. Maybe once that is done steps can begin again to move towards GA status. | 0.000541 | 0 | 0 |
Im glad you've gone. Don't come back. 195.89.48.217 | 0.505093 | 1 | 1 |
This guy is 100% retarded. | 0.967593 | 1 | 1 |
"
You're welcome. I don't dispute your action in removing it, because the likelihood is that knee-jerk reactions by reviewers will take against it in just that manner.
Yet when did ""write a featured article"" come to mean removing good sources? If we start making reactions like that, it's time to look at the fundamental goals and very hard at any secondary practices that have come to limit us in achieving them. " | 0.000645 | 0 | 0 |
Image:Rogafufuken.jpg
I have tagged Image:Rogafufuken.jpg as . In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Iamunknown | 0.001245 | 0 | 0 |
@intheKCmix Simmons acted like a bitch when Doc left for LA.. 😂😂 | 0.94341 | 1 | 1 |
}}
{{not here|may have left Wikipedia|Drewcifer3000|2012 May 21 | 0.000832 | 0 | 0 |
hi
I bet you love blocking people, you nut sack cracker | 0.925626 | 1 | 1 |
Jehochman is Crow's butt boy and needs to cut it out. Lest someone crawl on Jehochman for obvious COI,208.54.94.28
Proof that Gwernol is D C
D C is Gwernol for Dummies™'
1.TABFirst of all, D C- owns Gwernol.com (per WHOIS)
::Domain Name.......... gwernol.com
::Creation Date........ 2004-02-09
::Registration Date.... 2004-02-09
::Expiry Date.......... 2010-02-09
::Organisation Name.... DC - occulded name out of privacy concerns because i'm nicer than DC
::Organisation Address. P O Box xxxx
::Organisation Address.
::Organisation Address. E
::Organisation Address. 9
::Organisation Address. CA
::Organisation Address. US
2.TABThen, D C- has added pictures on Wikipedia as Gwernol, and signed them “D C”
3.TABD C- adds pictures to his Gwernol.com site, signing them “D C-”
4.TABToolserver.org Page with trains, name of Gwernol associated with D C
SVG: C- M- (Thryduulf)
PNG: D C- (Gwernol)
5.TABAlexa link to Gwernol.com with name of D C-
6.TABAboutus.com link to Gwernol.com with name of D C-
7.TAB Google Directories Page linking “Gwernol”’s Artificial Intelligence entry with Gwernol/signed by D C- entry
Google Directory - Computers > Artificial Intelligence > People
C-, D - http://gwernol.com/Research/ResearchInterests.html Unicru Inc. Intelligent search ::engines, machine learning, concept abstraction, 208.54.94.28
D C-'s Vanity Articles
Blurb, Inc. - DC's company created before he changed jobs to current
BookSmart - DC's product produced by DC's company
Dan_Crow_(computers)
DC is a strong (if not a *virulent*) anti-COI Admin. But he created his own article (about self) using a SPA, and for his company in his own name. And for the one product the company makes. None of these things (including DC) are notable (Lots of us publish papers D, and go to important meetings, and wind up in the paper. That's not what makes us notable, sorry). This has to stop. Why do I care? DC knows. I want that DC's hypocrisy stop. He attacks people for COI and does this? Please. Even now he's on the COI Mediation wiki for an issue with an editor re: IPTV. It gets better.
When I published this info two days ago, my computer was attacked. DC and JEH received a copy of a cross-country police report. 208.54.94.28 | 0.036672 | 0 | 0 |
1880
no the army was formed in 2002 by America, the 1880 army under the Monarchy was something else a differnt unit alltogether diffirent uniform,HQ etc you cant call them the same army. Afghanistan had northern alliance and Taliban two armies in the country,There is no National Afghan Army before | 0.000873 | 0 | 0 |
@SamRomero95 @KxRxSxB timber nigger | 0.961795 | 1 | 1 |
"
There is a general lack of references for the article. However the destruction of the abbey by Vikings has been pretty much accepted history up until now, and I don't think all mention should be deleted - especially with no proper referencing. It just leaves a blank. I shall try and find some refs for the article. Xandar " | 0.000552 | 0 | 0 |
the band unfortunately never gained popularity in the United States. - NPOV - | 0.000621 | 0 | 0 |
hurt your goddamn feelings | 0.96857 | 1 | 1 |
After tonight&& many more nights to come!! I will show you what a cold hearted bitch can do!!! #donefeedup #solo | 0.943556 | 1 | 1 |
"
I confirmed that a magazine with this name exists in Korea, but I cannot get any information on (1) how notable it is (2) who sponsors it (3) how it is viewed by other sources. When I googled the terms ""Civil Government + Magazine"" in Korean, the top results were all about JMS. (tock) " | 0.000541 | 0 | 0 |
"
It wasn't a personal attack; it was an allusion to the person who instigated all this. •talk• " | 0.000687 | 0 | 0 |
FUCK YOU
YOU SAD PIECE OF SHIT
GET A LIFE
DONT THREATEN ME WITH BLOCKING ME OFF THIS SHIT
DO I GIVE A FUCK
YOU LONELY HERMIT MAN
OPEN YOUR CURTAINS AND GET A LIFE BEFORE I BURN YOU ALIVE | 0.997222 | 1 | 1 |
Ugly ass hoe wanna be me so bad bitch gone on ✌️ | 0.998132 | 1 | 1 |
The article Hoover Criminal Gangsters has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. | 0.000553 | 0 | 0 |
Nice base running again by the @Yankees. Fucking ponderous. | 0.989147 | 1 | 1 |
unblock|I'm twelve! What is this? | 0.001385 | 0 | 0 |
Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #2
The July issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. | 0.000541 | 0 | 0 |
"BLAH BLAH BLAH FUCK YOU ....LAUGHING....
ARE YOU THAT STUPID?
I WOULDNT CITE ""WIKIPEDIA"" TO MY DOG
i AM READING THE POSTS ENCOURAGING YOU
THANKS FOR DELETING..... YES RIGHT
I AM NOT SO STUPID AS TO BE PATRONIZED AS YOU ARE
DELETEING MY GRAVATATION SHOWS A LACK OF WISDOM
" | 0.996857 | 1 | 1 |
Really Barnicle? OJ or Anthony Weiner? MJ is a clown show for #teabaggers and the rich. Come on #msnbc do you want good ratings? #morningjoe | 0.047769 | 0 | 1 |
Thanks, I think I made that before my name change | 0.000606 | 0 | 0 |
RT @L1LDebbie: You keep your bitch & ill stay on my grind. | 0.99549 | 1 | 1 |
My pleasure. Thanks to you for pointing out the naming was, ehm let's say, not so good. | 0.00055 | 0 | 0 |
"
Summer movies
I really wish you would consult with me before you unilaterally decide on making movie pages. Verbs are always capitalized and ""Everyone Space Is Here"" does not make any sense.— (竜龙) " | 0.000553 | 0 | 0 |
Strong disagree. SoftSecurity is more effective than HardSecurity. People prefer delineating a path by placing rocks as guide posts than having the path roped off. Keep off the grass signs are often objects of vandalism and uncontained anger.
Soft Security > Hard Security
Keep our Wikipedia open. | 0.001148 | 0 | 0 |
Multiculturalist sock puppet==
Someone just admitted that multiculturalist is their sockpuppet account, check the BNP talk page.
== | 0.010848 | 0 | 0 |
what was up with that block?
Seriously, what was up with that? Made NO SENSE. | 0.002417 | 0 | 0 |
"
About the topic ban of Wilhelmina Will from DYK
I've been trying to figure out what happened with the AN/I report that led to a topic ban for WW. Normally, when the community makes a decision that requires admin tools to implement or enforce, there is a closing administrator. I've reviewed the report and have summarized it at User:Abd/Will ANI incident (at this point, this is a long summary, not a short one, I will prepare a short version if it's later needed.) And I just realized that there never was a close to that report, which explains why WW wasn't informed, that would normally be a task undertaken by a closing admin. Now, you later described the report as a consensus to topic ban, and you did inform WW, but you reported it passively, as if it had not been your decision, you were just the messenger.
I easily understand how it happened, and assume nothing but good faith on your part, but there was a fundamental error here. The community does not make decisions by vote. Rather, it uses agents, public servants, who make decisions after review of community comment, but the servants are responsible for reviewing the arguments, and vote count isn't the issue except as a very rough guide, and I've seen many decisions, made by highly competent administrators, which ran directly contrary to a large majority of votes, based on a review of the arguments.
So I'm asking you if you did this. Did you review the arguments and decide that they were cogent and that a topic ban was in the best interests of the project. If you did not, would you do so now and ""close,"" i.e., take personal responsibility for the decision? In which case you could then inform us as to the length of the ban, or any other conditions imposed. And there would then be, if another administrator wishes to lift the ban, a responsible admin to contact?
I will tell you that my now much more detailed review of the facts leads me to the conclusion that a ban wasn't justified at all, there was no disruption at DYK from Wilhelmina Will, and there was very minor misbehavior elsewhere which only gets connected with DYK because of her presumed motive. A general conclusion from those who understand DYK seems to be that there is nothing wrong with the motive, and that what WW did was simply some minor foolishness, of a kind that would normally pass almost unnoticed, and which she has not continued. So, in spite of her seeming disregard of warnings, she clearly hasn't disregarded them, she just quietly complied. Yes, she should learn to respond, it would help. But I have never seen a response to a warning as being a condition for not blocking. The procedure is Warn. Wait for repeated offense. Block if repeated. Not Warn. Wait for promise to comply. Block if no promise.
There were several issues raised:
Mesodermchelys misbehavior: short term, over one or two days, 2 improper reverts to preserve word count. 3 edit summaries that express her personal reaction to Blechnic which, after reviewing what he had done, I fully understand and sympathize with. She was foolish to make those edit summaries, but it wasn't disruptive, and it wasn't personal attack within the meaning given at WP:NPA, whereas she was under repeated PA within that meaning: an attempt to damage her reputation.
Copyright violations. Evidence was requested at ANI, but none was provided, links were given by Blechnic that showed nothing of the kind. He is now attempting to build a case on his Talk page he now refers to all of her edits as crap, later amended to vandalism and what he cited was a sentence in a seven-month-old article which, it turns out, she had noticed in the Sandbox and asked an admin if she could use it, and she failed to check for copyvio. The sentence was a direct copy. Maybe. Or was it that a web site later took the sentence from Wikipedia? I certainly don't know. Easy to fix. No pattern shown.
Incivility. But the example given, as far as I recall, was always back to the Mesodermochelys incident. And then reference was made to her lying about it, claiming that her leetspeak comment was really a note to herself about something else. This was a clumsy excuse that simply shows that she is naive. And which was harmless, except to her own reputation.
Accuracy of her articles. She has made mistakes. However, what I've seen with WW articles on scientific subjects is that, particularly if they are DYK nominated, whatever errors are in them are rapidly fixed. The articles aren't an obstacle to the creation of accurate content, rather they facilitate it, particularly by being DYK nominated. In other words, if there is, in fact, a problem here, DYK is part of the solution, not part of the problem. But, in fact, her articles are much better than the average new article on Wikipedia.
Thanks for your attention to this. You could confirm | 0.001038 | 0 | 0 |
Ok. I'd really prefer not to rotate the constellation diagram, since then the carriers alternate between 'off' and 'on', rather than being always 'on'. So we'd have horizontal lines at zero for a lot of the time in the components, and it doesn't look so nice and doesn't make a useful analogy with BPSK (which would always be on). - | 0.000567 | 0 | 0 |
", 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Say whatever you want BUT Arvanites were Albanians. Your comments are influenced by fascism. Don`t want to offend you but this is how I see it. Example Domitius says to a Serb: Don't you think on some level that it may be best if it's accepted? It will solve the issue once and for all. The ""cancer of Kosovo"" will at last be gone and Serbia will have learned its lesson; in future do what the Greeks and Turks do: encourage ethnic Greeks and Turks respectively to move to ethnically sensitive territories, in other words encourage ethnic Serbs to move to the Sandžak along the border with Bosnia, to Vojvodina along the border with Hungary etc, just to be on the safe side in future. Is it still too late for the government to sponsor a mass Serb migration to the Serb areas of Kosovo to boost the population by several thousand?Domitius 18:19" | 0.002059 | 0 | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:Liberty Charter High School (La Mesa, California) | 0.000576 | 0 | 0 |
@mzkimberz I called you hoe lol | 0.115352 | 1 | 1 |
"
-Raeky, being a professional in a related field does not give an editor a COI, otherwise MDs could not edit medical articles and dentists could not edit dental articles, etc. If you disagree, please indicate which category of COI you feel DVMt belongs to and take your concerns to the relevant noticeboard to get consensus and set a precedent at wikipedia for editors editing articles related to their profession. Otherwise, please keep your comments here specific to the text and sources and not about other editors, ie., remain WP:CIVIL.
-What needs to be established here is if the few sources that are 'against the grain' and are highly critical of the efficacy of manipulation are noteworthy or simply represent a WP:FRINGE view. IMO, Ernst & Podsanski are the only 2 authors who make bold statements about manipulation, such as 'not effective', whereas the bulk of sources suggest equivalency with usual medical care and other conservative options. Thus, I see Ernst & Podsanski as outliers, or fringe, with regard to this specific topic of manipulation for back pain. Even source #4, which you noted says equal to sham, still suggests equivalency with other therapies for back pain, including usual medical care.
-Doc James, you seem to want to omit the common finding by multiple high-quality sources that manipulation is equivalent to usual medical care and physiotherapy for back pain? Doesn't policy indicate that the majority view gets more weight? Which theme has more weight among the available secondary sources? 1) That manipulation is not effective for back pain or 2) that manipulation is equal to 'usual medical care' for back pain? I think that we will need to decide how much weight each idea should get....hopefully this RFC will help. Also, you say you like the current text, but how does the current text ""may be as effective as other manual therapies"" reflect the well-sourced fact that manipulation is also equivalent to usual medical care for back pain treatment? " | 0.000686 | 0 | 0 |
Read you mother fucker or you shall fucking die you cocksucking prick
You can go to hell you fucking cocksucker and now I shall go ahead and masturbate | 0.997196 | 1 | 1 |
You need to look at this article in the guardian today ==
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/mar/04/police-killed-people-fbi-data-justifiable-homicides 75.83.209.135
Another important Guardian article today
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/mar/18/police-killings-government-data-count 75.83.209.135
Added to article as part of this edit. Thanks for the pointer!
== | 0.00058 | 0 | 0 |
Triple crown just about cleared..
OK, got out the broom and dusted off some stuff.. ) Cheers, (talk · contribs) | 0.000606 | 0 | 0 |
Hatch,
Go ahead and block me, my job is to promote clients, I guess you wont let me promote the other ten I was assigned to. It'd be better if you did block me, and I did not erase anything but the Costa article which you still have to delete. Are you all talk Hatch my redneck friend? | 0.126987 | 1 | 0 |
"
Shit
You blocked as your reason was ""because of you needing to learn not to be an idiot.""
What the fuck? You're the idiot, why don't you learn how to put a sentence together?
P.S. You're a cockblaster." | 0.99424 | 1 | 1 |
@user @user @user @user @user @user Suck these big balls instead you pussy. I would fight you anywhere anyway if you have the balls to step in. Come to Singapore we can sparr there kid. | 0.997566 | 1 | 1 |
Popped a pussy i'm sweating lol http://t.co/9Hyk5V0p | 0.974397 | 1 | 1 |
RT @SteveStfler: White girls, if your black boyfriend doesn't call you 'shawty', then bitch you ain't that special. | 0.974953 | 1 | 1 |
Please use the Wikipedia:Sandbox to experiment with editing on Wikipedia. Thanks! - (☎) | 0.00055 | 0 | 0 |
"
Pseudonymous editing
copied from an email received offline
Hi,
I'm not quite sure how this works, but your wrote in my deletion review, ""you say that your name and address are available, but your contributions to Wikipedia are pseudonymous.""
Does this mean I hadn't registered? I did so last night, and not under a pseudonym as most people have. I always use my real name in signatures.
And I don't know how to post to your talk page because there appears to be no ""post"" link.
Thanks,
Dennis Bathory-Kitsz
[email protected]
[email protected]
Thanks for your message but I think perhaps my meaning was still unclear. Whether you register or not doesn't really matter since anyone can register under any name. I could go online and register a Wikipedia account as George W. Bush (at least, if it's not already taken). Wikipedia has no means to authenticate your identity independently. All that we know - all that we can know - is what you choose to claim about yourself.
That's what I meant by pseudonymously - any registration, even if you say that it's your real name, is technically a pseudonym. It is not independently verified against some external identity database. And for the most part, that works out very well on Wikipedia. We want users and editors to establish themselves through their actions and to demonstrate their expertise through their edits, not by making claims to outside credentials.
By the way, anyone could also register as Dennis Bathory-Kitzs. That trivial misspelling would be easily overlooked by readers but would still be accepted by the system. Such a person could sign their name the same way you do, attempt to mimic your pattern of speech (well, writing really) and make subtle edits just to discredit you. That, in fact, is a real problem for established editors of Wikipedia. When we find usernames that are suspiciously similar to established users, we look very carefully for signs of vandalism or deceit. Users who appear to have done something like that on purpose are generally banned from Wikipedia. But those are all manual checks. There is no system that can automatically detect or prevent it.
Likewise, no one can inherently trust the email address. The way internet domains are set up, anyone could register bathory.org and create any email name they wanted. Like Wikipedia accounts, emails and internet domains are unverified against any external identity authority. And that's before you consider the problems of email spoofing and forgery - both of which are far easier and common today than any of us would like to admit.
Most people are honest. But there are enough dishonest people out there that we have to build our systems and our procedures in such a way that it doesn't matter whether they are telling the truth about their identity or not. That's why Wikipedia has a policy against original research (which we mean as ""a contribution or assertion based on personal experience"") and why we never rely solely on self-published materials and why we bias our policy so strongly in favor of reliable sources such as websites owned by and operated by large, well-known organizations - organizations with both a vested interest in and the resources to find and stop spoofing.
Sorry to bore you with all this but my non-Wikipedia profession is information security. The inherent problems of identity management and authentication occupy much of my waking hours. How can a bank know that you're really you? And how far can that trust be extended? Under what conditions can an assertion be treated as reliable? How do we balance that against the need to make systems and computers easy and accessible. Unfortunately, there are no easy answers short of establishing a national identity database - something which would be in great tension with my role as a privacy advocate.
Anyway, I'll get off my soapbox now. Thanks for your message.
To post to my Talk page, just go to the page and edit it like you would edit any page on Wikipedia. The most common technique is to use the little plus sign next to the ""edit this page"" tab at the top. That will automatically create a new section and give you a line to create a section header without having to know the wiki-markup symbols. You should also get in the habit of signing your posts on Talk pages. You can do that easily by ending your comment with four tildes (~~~~). When you save the page, the MediaWiki software will replace the tildes with your username and the date-timestamp.
Again, welcome to Wikipedia. (talk) " | 0.00139 | 0 | 0 |
Hopefully I understood this and to make sure I will rephrase so you can correct me. Absolute determinism is equivalent to history dependence (the entire chain of events leading to 'this event') as opposed to a stochastic process that has the Markov property (is memoryless, depending only upon the present state, not on the sequence of events that preceded it), describing a Markov chain. If so, this may be the 'root of all evil' so to say. QM depends on probability distributions. The even more restrictive Markov chains can be used in QM as a way to compute (example http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0764). The problem is discreteness vs continuity: Markov chains are discrete but QM has a continuous time evolution, and therein lies conflict. Is the history dependence what you would like to see clarified? | 0.00063 | 0 | 0 |
Leave our Country.
We don't want you Arabs here. | 0.972053 | 1 | 1 |
If anyone ever gets an attitude or w e with me idgaf who it is I am going to be a bitch right back 👌👌 | 0.991167 | 1 | 1 |
Nasal cycle
Sources for the [this? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nasal_cycle&diff;=481892150&oldid;=481587764]. | 0.000748 | 0 | 0 |
Dis broad done tagged dis nicca n a video of his sis giving dome .. #Tragic | 0.014494 | 0 | 0 |
Seems strange how 'The Bushranger' has the power of an admin when he/ she admits 'I also sneak around making insidious edits to any other topic I come across that needs a bit of improvement', yet a noob who makes edits without supplying 'published reliable sources' is shot down in flames. | 0.015269 | 0 | 0 |
"
It must have been someone else on your IP. — (talk) " | 0.000583 | 0 | 0 |
Funny how you constantly make up lies. I have not even made any personal attacks. | 0.015672 | 0 | 0 |
"
Absolutely not. ""Illegal immigrant"", ""illegal immigration"", and even simply ""illegals"" may not be the most politically correct choice of words, but they certainly aren't attack words in that context.— " | 0.000671 | 0 | 0 |
"
Milton, MA
Hey Markles, I was hoping you could tell me what you think about an ongoing problem with the article for Milton, MA. Certain editors have been including information in the introduction which seems not to be appropriate, almost invariably unreferenced and unverifiable claims about the ""irish"" nature of East Milton. The edits are often made by anonymous IP addresses, and the issue has been ongoing for at least a year now. Could you please take a quick look at the article's history and talk page and tell me what you think? It just seems a shame that a pretty decent article is constantly being let down in the introduction. Thanks. Talk " | 0.000671 | 0 | 0 |
Image
Hi.. image for [Wieck] was taken from the Univ. of Maine website, and prof. Wieck gave the permission for it, but I didn't know that wouldn't count. So I would need the permission of the univ. of maine, or can I specify that it was from the University's website??
Thanks!
Lana | 0.000614 | 0 | 0 |
Sitush is a bastard. Son of a low class retard who used to lick some shoes before he learnt how to use the computer.
I want to add the subject in the new article i will be writing about sitush the retarded scumbag. Let his get a shitfacial. | 0.987248 | 1 | 1 |
I am trying to get an article up that covers all of LDI's activities and links to both supporters and opponents of those activities.
In a previous incarnation of this page, before it was nuked, I included quite a few links, pro and con.
It is my understanding that there is to be some sort of discussion before nuking articles, and I can't even find out who has been doing the deletion! What sort of recourse do I have? | 0.002588 | 0 | 0 |
":::::::Err, I don't see a policy that requires Wikipedia to include information that is demonstrably false. I don't care whether you call it syntheses, connecting the dots, or jumping to conclusion, but to claim that someone confessed to something that they in fact, did not, is just wrong and stupid no matter who publishes it or repeats it. 63
" | 0.040749 | 0 | 0 |
"
But if you read the statemens by AI009, he even says Russia isn't an energy superpower, to him Russia a superpower nothing. He is making fun of the country and making really ridiculious statements about it. I personnally think this guy is using anti Russian slogans as much as he can but the real issue, he is a hawk when anything is in the Superpower article, the content is gone after something official is posted. No one gets to read anything. I think this is a real entrapment of speech, you can't post the facts at all. I think the Administrators need to put a dog leash on AI009 from attacking people's freedom to speak , this is suppose to be a community of current information and I feel I am beatened with this shark erasing the current facts with no control to get him off. A new book just came on the market just last week and I couldn't even post it today, it says the US is not a superpower anymore and gone it went the moment I put it up.[University Georgia Press by Edward A. Kolodziej and Roger E. Kanet"">] Member AI009 didn't even read it, what does that say." | 0.001829 | 0 | 0 |
on that same subject matter | 0.000657 | 0 | 0 |
I suspect that this year, we will only be sure of the final entry list on July 6 (i.e. the Unibet situation). Similarly, Operacion Puerto could once again deprive the race of the best riders (or liberate the race of cheaters?) literally as they take to the starting ramp.... The list of riders is not final until the evening before when they sign in and have physical checks. Indeed, I think the Tour allows a rider to be replaced on the day (Matt White or someone a few years back injured himself warming up?). So, in essence, there isn't really a day, and the date lacks importance anyway. S TC | 0.000643 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.