Databoost/MCRS_by_Databoost · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 7 5k	degree_of_toxicity float64 0 1	contains_offensive_word int64 0 1	label int64 0 1
You guys do realise that you aren't going to stop people enforcing honesty over your sad little corner of the internet, right? Whilst you are pulling your hair out that honest folks like me exist, we're in your Wikipedia, correcting your dishonest edits. It kills you, I know that, but it's time for the lies to stop, guise.	0.347469	1	0
seeing ur close girlfriends in public: HEY U STUPID FUCKING SLUT BITCH I HATE U seeing girls u dont really like: hey girl omgggg how u beeeennn its been foreverrrrrr	0.998194	1	1
Arcadia VZW Please consider including a link to Arcadia VZW, when the page gets unprotected.	0.000608	0	0
Oh, piss off you cant stop me, you suck!	0.996345	1	1
Your deletions It seems you are a danger to Wikipedia. Stop deleting pages! Your knowledge is limited and you don't know what you are doing, so stop butting in where you don't belong. 84.249.164.59	0.510275	1	0
So far today every time I try to load an article from the Blaze on Twitter the site crashes. WTF is Selibus doing now the cunt	0.612639	1	1
RT @wastedsatan: Ane is a cunt	0.94545	1	1
RT @Lydsortiz: Knew a bad bitch but she was kinda slow	0.956251	1	1
Omg bruh said this bitch look like a female JB smoove lmao http://t.co/UR5n1iuwjM	0.981103	1	1
@MyKat_Meows I don't know, I'm hoe-less, so I don't know where they congregate	0.003587	0	1
Exactly, just as all we can say about Deskana and the vandal is that they edited from the same college.	0.000694	0	0
“@ForeverrrJadaaa: huge nips scary me” they scary me too	0.047694	0	1
"Attitude: Face or Heel How about we add a new section ""Attitude""?. It exists in the German and French wikipedia, too. I think it's an information the users need. =="	0.000654	0	0
@user Worst thing is if they are that stupid to think he, all by himself, can roll back Roe v Wade then they really need to educate themselves on how SCOTUS works. They are probably being paid like the other hysterical women.	0.850482	1	1
thus bitch looks just like Lindsay Lohan she gets down just like Lindsay Lohan #DetroitGirls 😍👧👧❤❤❤	0.963568	1	1
"@adriwadrri: No love for these fuck niggas" hoes*	0.997239	1	1
@AllieBruner is my main bitch.	0.994394	1	1
" You have been blocked from editing for 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock\|your reason here}} . talk "	0.000626	0	0
"==Fair use rationale for Image:Witch Hunter Amon.jpg== Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Witch Hunter Amon.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ' talk Better source request for Image:Witch Hunter Amon.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Witch Hunter Amon.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. ' talk Fair use rationale for Image:Witch Hunter Sakaki.jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Witch Hunter Sakaki.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after t	0.000577	0	0
Charlemagne Thank you for your excellent work on the article.	0.000507	0	0
ZEST Uh.....hello....... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ZEST Thanks for your help !!!!	0.000813	0	0
Wikipieda has hurt my friends and caused them much grief... So, my hobby now is to Hurt Wikpeadia and cause it much grief... Tit for Tat	0.58406	1	1
" Controversy On December 12,2008 during a christmas drinking outing, TopGearFreak was caught committing an ""indecent act"" in the toilet of a bar in Washington. This prompted a swift expulsion and subsequent banning from the bar. TopGearFreak, being a cunt, has publicly said that he has ""no regrets"" and ""would do it again"". "	0.094942	0	0
Are huma rights directly related to the political ideology. Kibuts in northern Israel is a socialist state, as well as North Korea, so what does it say?	0.000738	0	0
I've never had a problem w\| anybody here, I've been w\| the company for a year, and then this snitch fucking bitch is trying to get me fired	0.996003	1	1
I did not. sometimes when I'm using my iPad I bump the rollback button when trying to look at a diff. I actually noticed I had done so but my connection is a bit slow today and I thought I had stopped it before it went live. Obviously that was a flawed assumption.	0.000937	0	0
Does this organization define or indentify itself as part of 'truth movement'? What is another 'truther group', does such construct exist outside of Wikipedia mindset?	0.00067	0	0
" Sorry if you think they are ""inappropriate"", but these are your actions....so I guess your actions are in effect inappropriate. - (VT) Meatpuppet You are a meat puppet, you have been confirmed a meatpuppet, the tag stands. - (VT) "	0.423877	1	1
REDIRECT Talk:U.S. Post Office–Yuma Main	0.000613	0	0
RT @PvTruest: #Nevertrustabitch never trust a bitch who has a fresh copy of master p album	0.836993	1	1
I would like to reiterate my earlier demand as I'm genuinely disenchanted by this unreasonable and unjustifiable attempt to malign me. If I'm in the wrong then please elaborate and let me review my errors, I don't appreciate these hit-and-run messages that serve to discourage active contribution. What specific guideline have I violated and why am I alone to stand trial when I have presented to you a multitude of violations committed by the other editors?	0.000728	0	0
(UTC) Proto, there's been quite a discussion on this issue after we had ours. It turns out that the G4 rule was in fact intended to mean something more closely resembling your initial understanding of the rule. Some editors have been making attempts to write a clearer G4, and their efforts may be seen here and here, on the CSD Talk page. As you had an interest in this, I thought I'd give you a heads up; I'm sure your comments will be useful.—έγκέφαλος 10:54:56, 2005-09-06	0.000525	0	0
" 1st Please, don't forget to sign before leave yr comment 2nd No, you saw pretty wrong - the 2nd quote of the version I propose is not present in the current version. 3rd Again... One more time... the present version has a serious flaw, as I put above in the section Spurious Quotations, by using a book citation in a spurious way doubly, not only by stating a different thing from the original citation, but mainly acting so, leaving a implicit meaning totally different from the original quote (To refresh your memory:) "" The original book citation states that in certain historical moment, a military revolt sparked a cycle of instability, while the present version using the 1st one in a partial way as reference (to give a veneer of respectability), states that the rise to power of the civilians, a year later, would have been responsible for the beginning of the overall instability."" ""Thus, spurious quotation aside, also a spurious correlation."" So, if to one: a) eliminate such spuriousness and b) put the appropriate initial causes of the instability of this period with proper references is not an improvement... Well, it would become not just hard, but impossible to believe in this one's good faith, as well as it would be the confirmation of this one's selective double standard behavior... 4th Concerning to the civilians' rising to power in the end of 1894, it was implied in some of my previous versions... which also, after more than a year... were not improved neither discussed, but disruptively reverted... Anyway... for now, how about(?): ""The early Brazilian republican period was nothing more than a military dictatorship.* Following the bubble of encilhamento and the 1st naval revolt, the country entered into a prolonged cycle of general instability marked by rebellions, both civilian* as military,*** that even with the ascension to power of civilians at the end of 1894, did not stop. Little by little these rebellions undermined the regime in a such extent that by 1930, in the wake of the murder of his running mate, it was possible for the defeated opposition presidential candidate Getúlio Vargas, supported by most of the military, to lead a revolt.* "" Oooor... ""The early Brazilian republican period was nothing more than a military dictatorship,* and pretty before the civilians rise to power in 1894, following 2 severe crisis, an economic and a military, the country has entered into a prolonged cycle of general instability marked by rebellions, both civilian* as military.**' Little by little these rebellions undermined the regime in a such extent that by 1930, in the wake of the murder of his running mate, it was possible for the defeated opposition presidential candidate Getúlio Vargas, supported by most of the military, to lead a revolt. "" And Last but not Least, concerning to changes of Brazil's boundaries in the early 20th century, it is already there in the version I propose, in the foreign affairs, 3rd paragraph (that same one, which yourself considered ""pretty solid"")... So, any more doubts about this paragraph? "	0.000814	0	0
Imdb has the wrong age. I believe it was 1969 too, but I am finding a lot of sources that say 1968, but it is definitely NOT 1964	0.000589	0	0
i can all types of good stuff... u just never let me... jerk ass	0.992328	1	1
Unlike you, I have improved the article in the past. Seems like the one who is obsessing and being disruptive is you. I suggest you find a better way of spending your time.	0.509285	1	1
Proposed approach This section is intended to be a compilation of actions needed to improve this article, based on discussion views and discussion on this page. I will begin by suggesting a few steps we can take to address concerns raised. These include: article length, length of notes section, need to place greater emphasis on his teachings and impact, layout (use of non-standard article headings), quality standards, etc. Here are some suggestions. Please feel free to add additional issues that need attention and comment on the order of doing things. Review headings, re-order as needed using standard layout Determine sections to be moved to sub articles Write summaries for these sections Create sub articles Review/reduce notes section Edit according to Good article criteria and/or Featured article criteria Submit for assessment	0.000544	0	0
I knew it. His user contribution page is one of the things I check when I signed in.	0.000569	0	0
Google Islam+beliefs and practices/Christianity+beliefs and practices, and then you get the same result as the one ytou supply for Judaism.	0.002101	0	0
Japanese Bastard Fuck off you evil race.	0.998704	1	1
No, I'm not, that why I asked.	0.000743	0	0
" With all due respect, Hersfoldat I am not certain that any is due at this pointyour ""belief"" that my reference to attacks mistakenly refers to boilerplate warnings is severely misguided. You attacked me. You continue to attack me. Continue to treat others in life as you have treated me, and I can guarantee you that you will not lead a life of happiness. "	0.410213	1	1
" Re: Grading ""Would it be OK for me to copyedit your song pages first, or suggest the changes (having me do it and then grade each would be quicker) and then place what class they are in?"" - Sure!!! If you can spare the time, I certainly wouldn't mind you doing the required edits. Its not as if anyone owns the article, you dont have to ask! ""about how you say things like, ""It was released on November 10, 11, 12, and 13, depending on the region."" (Yes not quoting you, just giving gist of what they say in the beginning as an example here.) I think it would be best to reword sentences like that. Maybe say ""It was released on five separate dates, from November 10 - November 13, depending upon the area targeted for distribution by ______."" (whatever the record label is, I dunno). How do you feel about that? Or the same sentence ending with ""depending on the region"", or ""depending on the area"""" - that makes much sense!!! I'll work on that, i'll do that bit, i'll make a small release history box in each article, and let you know when the article's ready. Then you can do a quick copy edit and grade them. Done? "	0.000635	0	0
Well, I think I've seen it stated someplace that subduction is driving most plate motion on a global scale, whatever an individual plate is doing. If that isn't already sourced in the article it should be. ( )	0.000542	0	0
" Hey , before you attempt to make a pathetic case that it constitutes ""outing"", I would suggest you think long and hard about whether someone who voluntarily posts under their real name can be ""Outed"" for being who they, in fact, actually are. "	0.018124	0	0
Request for arbitration I have opened a case at the Arbitration Committee regarding your close of the Ginger Jolie debate, noting both procedural and substantive errors, and focusing on the substitution of individual opinion for consensus community determination.	0.000529	0	0
Somebody named Werieth removed it from the Piha SLSC page.	0.043547	0	0
" They aren't as far as I can see. I did make a correction in the article regarding the identification of her paternal grandfather. - "	0.000562	0	0
" Rictus A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Rictus, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with . - "	0.000641	0	0
That is not how the color coding works. Some rating bodies use guidance categories and some use age restrictions and the color coding reflects this reality. Since the colored bars span the age ranges it is obvious to the reader which age groups they cover.	0.000604	0	0
silly little boy my ass	0.995549	1	1
RT @FriendlyAssh0le: when bitches talk about their bf 24/7 http://t.co/kDEBRyK5eR	0.829624	1	1
If I was a guy I'd definitely dress up as the fuck her right in the pussy guy	0.99462	1	1
" As I've already said, there was a similar drop in Putin's popularity before the 2004 elections, so that's not a new story. Reflecting in the lead every up and down in Putin's ratings is a heavy WP:RECENTISM and WP:Undue weight. Also, as was already said in the discussions above, there are different explanations to the booing story - reflecting them all means putting too much weight to this trivial event, while not reflecting them means non-neutral coverage. At the same event Putin was applauded, and it is not clear who was the person the booing was directed at. It's a sign of bias and yellow press style, and it's quite a pity that BBC and likes put so much attention to this episode. Note that Putin's popularity started decline before that event, and while I don't know the latest opinion polls, it is clear that if the popularity goes up that would be against the theory that that episode was somehow significant, while if the popularity goes down, that would be likely connected to the elections story rather than to some trivial episodes. Talk "	0.000654	0	0
Most numbers less than 1000 are numerologically interesting; 111 combines three ones into a whole, and therefore symbolizes the Trinity. 20:17, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)	0.000649	0	0
FUCK YOU YOU MOTHER FUCKING ASS CRACKER DILDO LICKING PIECE OF FUCKING ASS SHIT!!! GO CHOKE ON A MOTHER FUCKING COCK YOU CLIT SUCK! SUCK MY HUGE PULSATING PENIS AND EXTRACT THE HOT WET SEMEN FROM IT!! FUCK YOU DICKFACE! MY COCK IS REALLY FUCKING HARD RIGHT NOW!!	0.998813	1	1
Thanks! Attempts by several ,on his, and article talk pages have resulted in being ignored sigh. I suspect not a non-native English editor although grammar is very goods. Yeah frustrated. I think I walked into a prior personality war. 174.118.142.187	0.015699	0	0
" Best wishes. Jack In "	0.00067	0	0
Cry more please Please cry more	0.005251	0	0
REDIRECT Talk:Battle of Tinzaouaten	0.000723	0	0
Questions and Answers== Q: - Is Orange the brightest colour visible to the naked eye? ==	0.001031	0	0
Ain't no broke bitches standing next to me😴😴	0.941692	1	1
" Re: FAC The new wording's fine. My problem was saying that the features hadn't been seen in a multiplayer game, when the sources didn't support this. This was stated as one person's view, but represented as a general fact when it was just one reviewer's comment. Ask me if you need further clarification. Talk Contribs "	0.000642	0	0
Quick Message F U C K O F F that is all thanks	0.932444	1	1
I be ready to tell a bitch shut da fuck up lol	0.997421	1	1
Let's see some proof. Or does that go against your ingrained fascism?	0.01913	0	0
One night stand y'all hoes, y'all ain't nothing more!	0.572983	1	1
" As additional information, I have provided the following links to website which expound upon or make reference to the content of the blog I mentioned in my post: http://roflcon.org/2008/04/26/bonus-rofls-joe-mathlete-marmaduke-explained/ http://www.lesjones.com/posts/005176.shtml http://www.collegehumor.com/article:1723880 http://blog.wfmu.org/freeform/2006/12/marmaduke_expla.html http://www.pcmag.com/slideshow_viewer/0,1205,l%253D216520%2526a%253D216536%2526po%253D62,00.asp?p=y http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6153865 http://roflcon.org/2007/12/20/breaking-news-joe-mathlete-of-marmaduke-explained-at-roflcon/ My assertion was not that ""alot of people read the blog"" but that it is a relatively popular blog, meaning that it is popular enough to garner articles on the websites of Collegehumor, PCmag, and NPR. I apologize if a simple checking of blog hits is not enough to endow something with the long coveted ""notable"" status which you so graciously endow. You misquote me further: I did not call Wikipedia a ""clusterfucked internet bureaucracy."" I was referring to the system which allows certain users to override others simply based on their own personal experience, without any further insight. Listen, I understand that you do have to prevent spam on this website. I know that anyone could come in here and edit the page of a noted dignitary or president to say ""FUCK FUCK BBOOOBIES POOP"", but my posting was relevant enough to instigate investigation and your deletion of it amounts to an ego trip in that it simply regards the information I posted as irrelevant, despite the fact that my previous posting of it on this website lasted for months before being taken down. I assure you, I am not trying to spam up or fill the already expansive page about Marmaduke with misinformation. I simply want to let people know about a blog I enjoy which is critical of Marmaduke. I am acting in extremely good faith, and have all the freedom to call the levels of bureaucracy on wikipedia a ""clusterfuck"" and to call your edits an ""ego trip."" God forbid I should question your authority on the subject. I would appreciate it if you didn't try to condescend me. Thank you, yournumbertwofan"	0.579289	1	1
Can someone explain why a firm with so much positive work has been defined by Wiki only for controvery ? NY Times and Biz Week featured the firm - Why not much more on the positive they have done ? User:unsignd	0.00086	0	0
Block Your voluntary block is now in force for 3 months with no email permitted. You can sill edit your talk page, or edit with an IP. Why have you contested the block on commons when you want to be blocked here?	0.004383	0	0
I'd have to agree with John though - rather than act like a robot and simply delete the uses of the template it would have been simple enough for you to read through the reasoning in the tfd and replace it - yeah? Thanks/	0.000624	0	0
RT @itsDonLeach: You're still a pussy @BarackObama	0.98453	1	1
RT @ACMobbDeep: @sugarhillgang00 @willyc14_ high flyers, crr, militia, boner squad, ball sack, weiner FC, anal brownies	0.11172	1	1
Guido Hello Blueboy I had a feeling this would happened after I created the account. I work as a publicist and Vanessa DeLeon is one of my clients, she hired me to write and maintain this article, the one and only I would create which explains my choice of user name. Most of my information is directly from her site and her personally and if her name is searched on the web most of this information is readily availble from a variety of sources. Although I do know her personally I don't think it should be reason for her information to be delted from Wikipedia, all information in the article is factual and by no means did I try to make it bias. I would like to keep this page and would love feedback on how I could do so. Thank you in advance for your help. Guido (AKA DeleonDesign)	0.000602	0	0
Please note that the [[WP:NPOVUW]] shortcut has since been deleted. It was not at all clear and didn't work anyway (redirects to sections are currently not supported by the software). For now the use of [[WP:NPOV#Undue weight]] is recommended. ÷ talk	0.000561	0	0
i can be a sweetheart honestly, but being a bitch is my specialty	0.977476	1	1
All I want for my birthday is a big booty hoe 😎😎	0.031464	0	1
somebody should put 40 glocc down because either he is a mike knoxx or he is signed to g unit cause he says in almost every song that he is a g unit soldier.	0.011092	0	0
July 2007 (UTC) Or it could be a baby mammoth or a baby mastodon. 12:57, 25	0.006406	0	0
Regarding your comments on the work and energy definitions Would you care to review/improve my changes to the work article?	0.000696	0	0
Serves you right Haha! You are finally blocked for 1 month! Serves you right! Bwahhahahaha sucker!	0.977253	1	1
Who would even care about swearing anyway. Whoa they said a naughty word better tell mummy and daddy. Well you didn't state that in your edit did you? nope...so looks like i found the idiot on my wikipedia page not in a mirror. Tough words behind a computer screen. I think my judgement is right since your other edits have been considered vandalism. Borgy (talk) 09:13, 10 February 2009 (EST)	0.162096	1	0
Fuck You You can block me all you went im leaving this site anyways. Plus you have no life, Bitch sitting on the computer at 2:25 AM watching what people do. Your lame.	0.99758	1	1
":::Damn you, Hugh! Circles are a pain in the ass to draw in GIMP/Photoshop - but for you ... How do you suggest - a ""blow out"" zoomin in (otherwise IoM and CI area always going to be hard to see.) A circle is tough too because it is going to cut into northern Frace to take in the CI. pléigh "	0.927607	1	1
[[Barrett v. Rosenthal]	0.000682	0	0
" Why on earth should it say that? It's clear that not all Muslims say any particular thing; there are at least a billion of them. Your suggestion is redundant at best. (talk) "	0.006755	0	0
I do not deny anything. I will wait with any further action until the protecting admin returns to undo the picking of his preferred version.	0.00096	0	0
" ""writen in that article you do not understand ?"" HUH????? i dont get what your trying to tell me. it clearly states that it is a ""(pejorative)"" term = racist (not nice) thus, i need evidence that Serbs and Vlah's are the same as you claim. (its kind of saying that ""dirty mexican"" is a term for all latin people) "	0.037793	0	0
#Shoutout to everybody that follow a nicca!!	0.035964	0	1
There seem to be a gross misunderstanding.The errors you see, were infact seen by me too a day earlier and i sent, pointing vandalism, messages to people working/ supporting Guru Nanak's article.But you see after the errors were removed, i added some teachings/ verses of Guru Nanak and lots of other content.But some one keeps on removing that and adding stupid content.For example his fathers name was wriiten as Methane Gas!I'm trying to improve the article.Your help will be much appreciated by me , if you do want to help.If you see any change and it is by me, please disscuss it with me before editing it.THANKS	0.006759	0	0
Smurf a real cat bitch	0.976095	1	1
Q. on an image See my note here. My source are the maps found in Encyclopedia of IE culture.	0.000592	0	0
There was nothing but good intent. You placing a warning is fuck a best.	0.968673	1	1
@CallMeRenee_ 😂😂😂😩✌️ my bad bitch im logged in on everybody shit	0.994342	1	1
I have never seen an example of where the Jesus Bloodline theory has ever been linked to esoteric Christianity of the variety explained in the Wikipedia article, which predates the 1970s and goes back centuries when it was to do with metaphysical and not with material concepts.	0.000709	0	0
I wanna edit I wanna edit without making a username like you losers. GIVE ME MY RIGHTS!!!!!	0.959225	1	1
What an awful article! I don't know, I'm missing out. —	0.142157	1	0
Its wayyyyy more going on now than 2 have u pushing yo trash ass music right now	0.973535	1	1
On second thought, I'd ask that you just give your final evaluation of the article the next time you look at this. If you think the article fails in its current state solely because of the dead url, I disagree, but that's fine. Given the pace at which our discussion is moving, however, I think renominating it and getting a fresh review seems like the fastest route to its revision and passage. This review is just moving too slowly, has become too adversarial, and seems to me too disconnected from the GA criteria for effective collaboration to be possible. Sorry this didn't work out better. I do appreciate your improvements to the articleyou've made a lot of good suggestions!	0.000564	0	0
'Personal attack site' Some background information might be of help to administrators. And to yourself, of course. When I read those links, it seems that your administration and editing pattern raises some eyebrows from several people. I would like to advise you to read those topics well and think about how to solve those problems. BTW: Wikipedia Review is not anti-Wikipedia (although several users are), but tries to provide an independent platform for commentaries on Wikipedia policies. As such, Wikipedia Review is of great benefit and indispensible for Wikipedia. (Talk \| Contribs 25px)	0.000586	0	0

You guys do realise that you aren't going to stop people enforcing honesty over your sad little corner of the internet, right? Whilst you are pulling your hair out that honest folks like me exist, we're in your Wikipedia, correcting your dishonest edits. It kills you, I know that, but it's time for the lies to stop, guise.

0.347469

1

0

seeing ur close girlfriends in public: HEY U STUPID FUCKING SLUT BITCH I HATE U seeing girls u dont really like: hey girl omgggg how u beeeennn its been foreverrrrrr

0.998194

1

Arcadia VZW Please consider including a link to Arcadia VZW, when the page gets unprotected.

0.000608

0

Oh, piss off you cant stop me, you suck!

0.996345

1

Your deletions It seems you are a danger to Wikipedia. Stop deleting pages! Your knowledge is limited and you don't know what you are doing, so stop butting in where you don't belong. 84.249.164.59

0.510275

1

0

So far today every time I try to load an article from the Blaze on Twitter the site crashes. WTF is Selibus doing now the cunt

0.612639

1

RT @wastedsatan: Ane is a cunt

0.94545

1

RT @Lydsortiz: Knew a bad bitch but she was kinda slow

0.956251

1

Omg bruh said this bitch look like a female JB smoove lmao http://t.co/UR5n1iuwjM

0.981103

1

@MyKat_Meows I don't know, I'm hoe-less, so I don't know where they congregate

0.003587

0

1

Exactly, just as all we can say about Deskana and the vandal is that they edited from the same college.

0.000694

0

“@ForeverrrJadaaa: huge nips scary me” they scary me too

0.047694

0

1

"Attitude: Face or Heel How about we add a new section ""Attitude""?. It exists in the German and French wikipedia, too. I think it's an information the users need. =="

0.000654

0

@user Worst thing is if they are that stupid to think he, all by himself, can roll back Roe v Wade then they really need to educate themselves on how SCOTUS works. They are probably being paid like the other hysterical women.

0.850482

1

thus bitch looks just like Lindsay Lohan she gets down just like Lindsay Lohan #DetroitGirls 😍👧👧❤❤❤

0.963568

1

"@adriwadrri: No love for these fuck niggas" hoes*

0.997239

1

@AllieBruner is my main bitch.

0.994394

1

" You have been blocked from editing for 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . talk "

0.000626

0

"==Fair use rationale for Image:Witch Hunter Amon.jpg== Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Witch Hunter Amon.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ' talk Better source request for Image:Witch Hunter Amon.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Witch Hunter Amon.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. ' talk Fair use rationale for Image:Witch Hunter Sakaki.jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Witch Hunter Sakaki.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after t

0.000577

0

Charlemagne Thank you for your excellent work on the article.

0.000507

0

ZEST Uh.....hello....... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ZEST Thanks for your help !!!!

0.000813

0

Wikipieda has hurt my friends and caused them much grief... So, my hobby now is to Hurt Wikpeadia and cause it much grief... Tit for Tat

0.58406

1

" Controversy On December 12,2008 during a christmas drinking outing, TopGearFreak was caught committing an ""indecent act"" in the toilet of a bar in Washington. This prompted a swift expulsion and subsequent banning from the bar. TopGearFreak, being a cunt, has publicly said that he has ""no regrets"" and ""would do it again"". "

0.094942

0

Are huma rights directly related to the political ideology. Kibuts in northern Israel is a socialist state, as well as North Korea, so what does it say?

0.000738

0

I've never had a problem w| anybody here, I've been w| the company for a year, and then this snitch fucking bitch is trying to get me fired

0.996003

1

I did not. sometimes when I'm using my iPad I bump the rollback button when trying to look at a diff. I actually noticed I had done so but my connection is a bit slow today and I thought I had stopped it before it went live. Obviously that was a flawed assumption.

0.000937

0

Does this organization define or indentify itself as part of 'truth movement'? What is another 'truther group', does such construct exist outside of Wikipedia mindset?

0.00067

0

" Sorry if you think they are ""inappropriate"", but these are your actions....so I guess your actions are in effect inappropriate. - (VT) Meatpuppet You are a meat puppet, you have been confirmed a meatpuppet, the tag stands. - (VT) "

0.423877

1

REDIRECT Talk:U.S. Post Office–Yuma Main

0.000613

0

RT @PvTruest: #Nevertrustabitch never trust a bitch who has a fresh copy of master p album

0.836993

1

I would like to reiterate my earlier demand as I'm genuinely disenchanted by this unreasonable and unjustifiable attempt to malign me. If I'm in the wrong then please elaborate and let me review my errors, I don't appreciate these hit-and-run messages that serve to discourage active contribution. What specific guideline have I violated and why am I alone to stand trial when I have presented to you a multitude of violations committed by the other editors?

0.000728

0

(UTC) Proto, there's been quite a discussion on this issue after we had ours. It turns out that the G4 rule was in fact intended to mean something more closely resembling your initial understanding of the rule. Some editors have been making attempts to write a clearer G4, and their efforts may be seen here and here, on the CSD Talk page. As you had an interest in this, I thought I'd give you a heads up; I'm sure your comments will be useful.—έγκέφαλος 10:54:56, 2005-09-06

0.000525

0

" 1st Please, don't forget to sign before leave yr comment 2nd No, you saw pretty wrong - the 2nd quote of the version I propose is not present in the current version. 3rd Again... One more time... the present version has a serious flaw, as I put above in the section Spurious Quotations, by using a book citation in a spurious way doubly, not only by stating a different thing from the original citation, but mainly acting so, leaving a implicit meaning totally different from the original quote (To refresh your memory:) "" The original book citation states that in certain historical moment, a military revolt sparked a cycle of instability, while the present version using the 1st one in a partial way as reference (to give a veneer of respectability), states that the rise to power of the civilians, a year later, would have been responsible for the beginning of the overall instability."" ""Thus, spurious quotation aside, also a spurious correlation."" So, if to one: a) eliminate such spuriousness and b) put the appropriate initial causes of the instability of this period with proper references is not an improvement... Well, it would become not just hard, but impossible to believe in this one's good faith, as well as it would be the confirmation of this one's selective double standard behavior... 4th Concerning to the civilians' rising to power in the end of 1894, it was implied in some of my previous versions... which also, after more than a year... were not improved neither discussed, but disruptively reverted... Anyway... for now, how about(?): ""The early Brazilian republican period was nothing more than a military dictatorship.* Following the bubble of encilhamento** and the 1st naval revolt, the country entered into a prolonged cycle of general instability marked by rebellions, both civilian*** as military,*** that even with the ascension to power of civilians at the end of 1894, did not stop. Little by little these rebellions undermined the regime in a such extent that by 1930, in the wake of the murder of his running mate, it was possible for the defeated opposition presidential candidate Getúlio Vargas, supported by most of the military, to lead a revolt.* "" Oooor... ""The early Brazilian republican period was nothing more than a military dictatorship,* and pretty before the civilians rise to power in 1894, following 2 severe crisis, an economic and a military,** the country has entered into a prolonged cycle of general instability marked by rebellions, both civilian*** as military.***' Little by little these rebellions undermined the regime in a such extent that by 1930, in the wake of the murder of his running mate, it was possible for the defeated opposition presidential candidate Getúlio Vargas, supported by most of the military, to lead a revolt.* "" And Last but not Least, concerning to changes of Brazil's boundaries in the early 20th century, it is already there in the version I propose, in the foreign affairs, 3rd paragraph (that same one, which yourself considered ""pretty solid"")... So, any more doubts about this paragraph? "

0.000814

0

Imdb has the wrong age. I believe it was 1969 too, but I am finding a lot of sources that say 1968, but it is definitely NOT 1964

0.000589

0

i can all types of good stuff... u just never let me... jerk ass

0.992328

1

Unlike you, I have improved the article in the past. Seems like the one who is obsessing and being disruptive is you. I suggest you find a better way of spending your time.

0.509285

1

Proposed approach This section is intended to be a compilation of actions needed to improve this article, based on discussion views and discussion on this page. I will begin by suggesting a few steps we can take to address concerns raised. These include: article length, length of notes section, need to place greater emphasis on his teachings and impact, layout (use of non-standard article headings), quality standards, etc. Here are some suggestions. Please feel free to add additional issues that need attention and comment on the order of doing things. Review headings, re-order as needed using standard layout Determine sections to be moved to sub articles Write summaries for these sections Create sub articles Review/reduce notes section Edit according to Good article criteria and/or Featured article criteria Submit for assessment

0.000544

0

I knew it. His user contribution page is one of the things I check when I signed in.

0.000569

0

Google Islam+beliefs and practices/Christianity+beliefs and practices, and then you get the same result as the one ytou supply for Judaism.

0.002101

0

Japanese Bastard Fuck off you evil race.

0.998704

1

No, I'm not, that why I asked.

0.000743

0

" With all due respect, Hersfoldat I am not certain that any is due at this pointyour ""belief"" that my reference to attacks mistakenly refers to boilerplate warnings is severely misguided. You attacked me. You continue to attack me. Continue to treat others in life as you have treated me, and I can guarantee you that you will not lead a life of happiness. "

0.410213

1

" Re: Grading ""Would it be OK for me to copyedit your song pages first, or suggest the changes (having me do it and then grade each would be quicker) and then place what class they are in?"" - Sure!!! If you can spare the time, I certainly wouldn't mind you doing the required edits. Its not as if anyone owns the article, you dont have to ask! ""about how you say things like, ""It was released on November 10, 11, 12, and 13, depending on the region."" (Yes not quoting you, just giving gist of what they say in the beginning as an example here.) I think it would be best to reword sentences like that. Maybe say ""It was released on five separate dates, from November 10 - November 13, depending upon the area targeted for distribution by ______."" (whatever the record label is, I dunno). How do you feel about that? Or the same sentence ending with ""depending on the region"", or ""depending on the area"""" - that makes much sense!!! I'll work on that, i'll do that bit, i'll make a small release history box in each article, and let you know when the article's ready. Then you can do a quick copy edit and grade them. Done? "

0.000635

0

Well, I think I've seen it stated someplace that subduction is driving most plate motion on a global scale, whatever an individual plate is doing. If that isn't already sourced in the article it should be. ( )

0.000542

0

" Hey , before you attempt to make a pathetic case that it constitutes ""outing"", I would suggest you think long and hard about whether someone who voluntarily posts under their real name can be ""Outed"" for being who they, in fact, actually are. "

0.018124

0

Request for arbitration I have opened a case at the Arbitration Committee regarding your close of the Ginger Jolie debate, noting both procedural and substantive errors, and focusing on the substitution of individual opinion for consensus community determination.

0.000529

0

Somebody named Werieth removed it from the Piha SLSC page.

0.043547

0

" They aren't as far as I can see. I did make a correction in the article regarding the identification of her paternal grandfather. - "

0.000562

0

" Rictus A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Rictus, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with . - "

0.000641

0

That is not how the color coding works. Some rating bodies use guidance categories and some use age restrictions and the color coding reflects this reality. Since the colored bars span the age ranges it is obvious to the reader which age groups they cover.

0.000604

0

silly little boy my ass

0.995549

1

RT @FriendlyAssh0le: when bitches talk about their bf 24/7 http://t.co/kDEBRyK5eR

0.829624

1

If I was a guy I'd definitely dress up as the fuck her right in the pussy guy

0.99462

1

" As I've already said, there was a similar drop in Putin's popularity before the 2004 elections, so that's not a new story. Reflecting in the lead every up and down in Putin's ratings is a heavy WP:RECENTISM and WP:Undue weight. Also, as was already said in the discussions above, there are different explanations to the booing story - reflecting them all means putting too much weight to this trivial event, while not reflecting them means non-neutral coverage. At the same event Putin was applauded, and it is not clear who was the person the booing was directed at. It's a sign of bias and yellow press style, and it's quite a pity that BBC and likes put so much attention to this episode. Note that Putin's popularity started decline before that event, and while I don't know the latest opinion polls, it is clear that if the popularity goes up that would be against the theory that that episode was somehow significant, while if the popularity goes down, that would be likely connected to the elections story rather than to some trivial episodes. Talk "

0.000654

0

Most numbers less than 1000 are numerologically interesting; 111 combines three ones into a whole, and therefore symbolizes the Trinity. 20:17, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

0.000649

0

FUCK YOU YOU MOTHER FUCKING ASS CRACKER DILDO LICKING PIECE OF FUCKING ASS SHIT!!! GO CHOKE ON A MOTHER FUCKING COCK YOU CLIT SUCK! SUCK MY HUGE PULSATING PENIS AND EXTRACT THE HOT WET SEMEN FROM IT!! FUCK YOU DICKFACE! MY COCK IS REALLY FUCKING HARD RIGHT NOW!!

0.998813

1

Thanks! Attempts by several ,on his, and article talk pages have resulted in being ignored *sigh*. I suspect not a non-native English editor although grammar is very goods. Yeah frustrated. I think I walked into a prior personality war. 174.118.142.187

0.015699

0

" Best wishes. Jack In "

0.00067

0

Cry more please Please cry more

0.005251

0

REDIRECT Talk:Battle of Tinzaouaten

0.000723

0

Questions and Answers== Q: - Is Orange the brightest colour visible to the naked eye? ==

0.001031

0

Ain't no broke bitches standing next to me😴😴

0.941692

1

" Re: FAC The new wording's fine. My problem was saying that the features hadn't been seen in a multiplayer game, when the sources didn't support this. This was stated as one person's view, but represented as a general fact when it was just one reviewer's comment. Ask me if you need further clarification. Talk Contribs "

0.000642

0

Quick Message F U C K O F F that is all thanks

0.932444

1

I be ready to tell a bitch shut da fuck up lol

0.997421

1

Let's see some proof. Or does that go against your ingrained fascism?

0.01913

0

One night stand y'all hoes, y'all ain't nothing more!

0.572983

1

" As additional information, I have provided the following links to website which expound upon or make reference to the content of the blog I mentioned in my post: http://roflcon.org/2008/04/26/bonus-rofls-joe-mathlete-marmaduke-explained/ http://www.lesjones.com/posts/005176.shtml http://www.collegehumor.com/article:1723880 http://blog.wfmu.org/freeform/2006/12/marmaduke_expla.html http://www.pcmag.com/slideshow_viewer/0,1205,l%253D216520%2526a%253D216536%2526po%253D62,00.asp?p=y http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6153865 http://roflcon.org/2007/12/20/breaking-news-joe-mathlete-of-marmaduke-explained-at-roflcon/ My assertion was not that ""alot of people read the blog"" but that it is a relatively popular blog, meaning that it is popular enough to garner articles on the websites of Collegehumor, PCmag, and NPR. I apologize if a simple checking of blog hits is not enough to endow something with the long coveted ""notable"" status which you so graciously endow. You misquote me further: I did not call Wikipedia a ""clusterfucked internet bureaucracy."" I was referring to the system which allows certain users to override others simply based on their own personal experience, without any further insight. Listen, I understand that you do have to prevent spam on this website. I know that anyone could come in here and edit the page of a noted dignitary or president to say ""FUCK FUCK BBOOOBIES POOP"", but my posting was relevant enough to instigate investigation and your deletion of it amounts to an ego trip in that it simply regards the information I posted as irrelevant, despite the fact that my previous posting of it on this website lasted for months before being taken down. I assure you, I am not trying to spam up or fill the already expansive page about Marmaduke with misinformation. I simply want to let people know about a blog I enjoy which is critical of Marmaduke. I am acting in extremely good faith, and have all the freedom to call the levels of bureaucracy on wikipedia a ""clusterfuck"" and to call your edits an ""ego trip."" God forbid I should question your authority on the subject. I would appreciate it if you didn't try to condescend me. Thank you, yournumbertwofan"

0.579289

1

Can someone explain why a firm with so much positive work has been defined by Wiki only for controvery ? NY Times and Biz Week featured the firm - Why not much more on the positive they have done ? User:unsignd

0.00086

0

Block Your voluntary block is now in force for 3 months with no email permitted. You can sill edit your talk page, or edit with an IP. Why have you contested the block on commons when you want to be blocked here?

0.004383

0

I'd have to agree with John though - rather than act like a robot and simply delete the uses of the template it would have been simple enough for you to read through the reasoning in the tfd and replace it - yeah? Thanks/

0.000624

0

RT @itsDonLeach: You're still a pussy @BarackObama

0.98453

1

RT @ACMobbDeep: @sugarhillgang00 @willyc14_ high flyers, crr, militia, boner squad, ball sack, weiner FC, anal brownies

0.11172

1

Guido Hello Blueboy I had a feeling this would happened after I created the account. I work as a publicist and Vanessa DeLeon is one of my clients, she hired me to write and maintain this article, the one and only I would create which explains my choice of user name. Most of my information is directly from her site and her personally and if her name is searched on the web most of this information is readily availble from a variety of sources. Although I do know her personally I don't think it should be reason for her information to be delted from Wikipedia, all information in the article is factual and by no means did I try to make it bias. I would like to keep this page and would love feedback on how I could do so. Thank you in advance for your help. Guido (AKA DeleonDesign)

0.000602

0

Please note that the [[WP:NPOVUW]] shortcut has since been deleted. It was not at all clear and didn't work anyway (redirects to sections are currently not supported by the software). For now the use of [[WP:NPOV#Undue weight]] is recommended. ÷ talk

0.000561

0

i can be a sweetheart honestly, but being a bitch is my specialty

0.977476

1

All I want for my birthday is a big booty hoe 😎😎

0.031464

0

1

somebody should put 40 glocc down because either he is a mike knoxx or he is signed to g unit cause he says in almost every song that he is a g unit soldier.

0.011092

0

July 2007 (UTC) Or it could be a baby mammoth or a baby mastodon. 12:57, 25

0.006406

0

Regarding your comments on the work and energy definitions Would you care to review/improve my changes to the work article?

0.000696

0

Serves you right Haha! You are finally blocked for 1 month! Serves you right! Bwahhahahaha sucker!

0.977253

1

Who would even care about swearing anyway. Whoa they said a naughty word better tell mummy and daddy. Well you didn't state that in your edit did you? nope...so looks like i found the idiot on my wikipedia page not in a mirror. Tough words behind a computer screen. I think my judgement is right since your other edits have been considered vandalism. Borgy (talk) 09:13, 10 February 2009 (EST)

0.162096

1

0

Fuck You You can block me all you went im leaving this site anyways. Plus you have no life, Bitch sitting on the computer at 2:25 AM watching what people do. Your lame.

0.99758

1

":::Damn you, Hugh! Circles are a pain in the ass to draw in GIMP/Photoshop - but for you ... How do you suggest - a ""blow out"" zoomin in (otherwise IoM and CI area always going to be hard to see.) A circle is tough too because it is going to cut into northern Frace to take in the CI. pléigh "

0.927607

1

[[Barrett v. Rosenthal]

0.000682

0

" Why on earth should it say that? It's clear that not all Muslims say any particular thing; there are at least a billion of them. Your suggestion is redundant at best. (talk) "

0.006755

0

I do not deny anything. I will wait with any further action until the protecting admin returns to undo the picking of his preferred version.

0.00096

0

" ""writen in that article you do not understand ?"" HUH????? i dont get what your trying to tell me. it clearly states that it is a ""(pejorative)"" term = racist (not nice) thus, i need evidence that Serbs and Vlah's are the same as you claim. (its kind of saying that ""dirty mexican"" is a term for all latin people) "

0.037793

0

#Shoutout to everybody that follow a nicca!!

0.035964

0

1

There seem to be a gross misunderstanding.The errors you see, were infact seen by me too a day earlier and i sent, pointing vandalism, messages to people working/ supporting Guru Nanak's article.But you see after the errors were removed, i added some teachings/ verses of Guru Nanak and lots of other content.But some one keeps on removing that and adding stupid content.For example his fathers name was wriiten as Methane Gas!I'm trying to improve the article.Your help will be much appreciated by me , if you do want to help.If you see any change and it is by me, please disscuss it with me before editing it.THANKS

0.006759

0

Smurf a real cat bitch

0.976095

1

Q. on an image See my note here. My source are the maps found in Encyclopedia of IE culture.

0.000592

0

There was nothing but good intent. You placing a warning is fuck a best.

0.968673

1

@CallMeRenee_ 😂😂😂😩✌️ my bad bitch im logged in on everybody shit

0.994342

1

I have never seen an example of where the Jesus Bloodline theory has ever been linked to esoteric Christianity of the variety explained in the Wikipedia article, which predates the 1970s and goes back centuries when it was to do with metaphysical and not with material concepts.

0.000709

0

I wanna edit I wanna edit without making a username like you losers. GIVE ME MY RIGHTS!!!!!

0.959225

1

What an awful article! I don't know, I'm missing out. —

0.142157

1

0

Its wayyyyy more going on now than 2 have u pushing yo trash ass music right now

0.973535

1

On second thought, I'd ask that you just give your final evaluation of the article the next time you look at this. If you think the article fails in its current state solely because of the dead url, I disagree, but that's fine. Given the pace at which our discussion is moving, however, I think renominating it and getting a fresh review seems like the fastest route to its revision and passage. This review is just moving too slowly, has become too adversarial, and seems to me too disconnected from the GA criteria for effective collaboration to be possible. Sorry this didn't work out better. I do appreciate your improvements to the articleyou've made a lot of good suggestions!

0.000564

0

'Personal attack site' Some background information might be of help to administrators. And to yourself, of course. When I read those links, it seems that your administration and editing pattern raises some eyebrows from several people. I would like to advise you to read those topics well and think about how to solve those problems. BTW: Wikipedia Review is not anti-Wikipedia (although several users are), but tries to provide an independent platform for commentaries on Wikipedia policies. As such, Wikipedia Review is of great benefit and indispensible for Wikipedia. (Talk | Contribs 25px)

0.000586

0