Databoost/MCRS_by_Databoost · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 7 5k	degree_of_toxicity float64 0 1	contains_offensive_word int64 0 1	label int64 0 1
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. (talk)	0.000529	0	0
April .... are you gay? If you block or delete this of course, then you are obviously homophobic.	0.967248	1	1
I think its very unfair to compare my edits with those of Tbma/YMB29, first i have been the main contributor to this article, i have seeked the sources/ disscused in discusion all in line to improve this article, this is not the case with Tbma/YMB29 who just last week consider the whole article a hoax, also today i really displined myself not doing any of the previuslly acts of misconduct, so i think your crttisism of me is utterlly unfair.	0.002123	0	0
"::::""The Rapture: Hoax or Hype?"" That's about as big a violation of NPOV as one can get. That is certainly a useful guide... of what to avoid. We've covered all the POVs here, including the fact that Amillenialists and Post-Millenialists are less likely to use the term than Historic Premillenialists, even though their formulation of the doctrine with the Second Coming is virtually identical. That's about as good as we can do here. But ""hoax or hype"" writing isn't something Wikipedia is meant to do. "	0.000673	0	0
Shelly Shock Shelly Shock is. . .( )	0.000824	0	0
Alzira Peirce controversy Since you've blocked me for my criticism of [email protected] re the Alzira Peirce article I'd like to draw your attention to evidence of [email protected] track record of abusing editor role available at http://www.questpedia.org/en/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/[email protected], http://en.wikipedia.atpedia.com/en/articles/r/e/q/[email protected]_b1fd.html.	0.000752	0	0
{{help me}} How may I help? \| (Talk)	0.000634	0	0
To answer your first question about percentage amount: The third line for 1990-2000 (35-50%) was turned into 40-60%, while the forth line for 2000-present (50-75%)] was turned into 60-80%. So we still have equal amounts overall. To answer your second question: We currently don't have [Page 2] anymore, it was created at one point but it was re-merged with the original. And the main reason we decided to trip the bottom 20 million is because the list had passed 350,000 bytes. For many months ahead, we won't be modifying the length of the list. And we may never will if we manage to keep the bytes around 250,000.	0.000608	0	0
Welcome back. Here is a crapping cat, a universal symbol of relief. vzaak	0.503244	1	1
Its not the same thing. Whatsoever. This article is pitiful and misleading	0.093343	0	0
" I don't think the Kirby anime is canonical. (talk) 21:24, August 27, 2005 (UTC)"	0.000598	0	0
" Pro Moldovan?? What in hell!!! do I have to do with those communists??? I doubt that you didn`t already knew, but the current Moldovan communist regime, doesn`t even recognise veterans of the Trns war, and says that they were ""victims of Romanian fascist propaganda""... No big difference between Smirnov and Voronin. Both alogene colonists, both use polical ideology for personal benefits, both primitive, etc "	0.748814	1	1
@MrRedMartian this pic is trash. D!ck is dry af.	0.986054	1	1
RT @larryelder: Holder asks, "What AG has had to deal with that kind of treatment?” Tell the whiny little bitch to call Alberto Gonzales an…	0.733407	1	1
Can't you at least have the common courtesy to answer my question, or do you just want to be a jerk?	0.77408	1	1
" ...yeah, I did make a balls up of it. Sorry about that. Back to school for me... inspect damage⁄berate "	0.008233	0	0
I called. In to work n bitch said they might not want me to go back	0.907277	1	1
shut the hell up Zabrak Dragong4	0.896813	1	1
RT @ToriJBerman: @_VintageVixen lmao bummy bitches	0.978133	1	1
By the way you and everyone else like you are an absolute disgrace. You're hypocrits and are barriers to freedom of expression - why does wikipedia bother to blackout in protest to PIPA and SOPA when it doesn't allow information on its website anyway. As for you shimgray you're sad, pathetic and spineless; you take satisfaction from deleting other articles and generally feeling self important, as a result. You will clearly never be of any importance or notability thus you feel it is your right to try and be so via your menial control over an electronic encyclopedia. Rot in hell. I wish you a slow, painful death, hopefully very soon.	0.970344	1	1
Wow, that's like six-million times better than the stub I put together. Nice work, guys. -	0.000579	0	0
Never that serious RT @C_thaqueen: Thought you was Finna cruise with a new bitch 😩🔑🔪✋? http://t.co/MvCnPYtXo8	0.868173	1	1
I'm not foolish you mother is foolish you prick and replay to me on my account not on my IP!- Your such a nerd with acne that will probally die alone (thats a shame) thinking your all cool going on wikipedia everyday of your life and not doing anything if your a teenager that just makes it worse . -	0.981801	1	1
RT @mckooley: shimmy shimmy ya bitch	0.993813	1	1
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to 311 (band). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.	0.00071	0	0
🏆 RT @UBoyRock17: Every bitch n my passenger seat I dun fucked at least one time	0.996721	1	1
Jonica look like a hoe from 55th and superior 😂😂	0.283705	1	1
I got some bitch ass coworkers. I stay late every day last week I don't complain about them mfs. They stay late they send emails that I left	0.973652	1	1
Quoting or referring to photographers as support for the assertion that photography belongs in the fine arts shows me that the author of this page knows nothing about the subject. What kind of idiot do you take me for?	0.288629	1	0
IT IS TRUE! ASK A LOCAL! Seriously, us Aylesfordians HATE it when people say our dear village, which was the first in the UK, covers Larkfield, Eccles and all of that other shit. THOSE ARE SEPERATE VILLAGES. AND THAT'S FINAL. 94.168.95.164	0.836386	1	1
Johnuniq and Quietmark, This is my last response. I do not have a problem with how you handled the discussion page and I appreciate the polite responses. I brought up my PhD in statistics because a contributor thought it would be appropriate to just delete my discussion, so I wanted to know why they felt that was within their purview. Do they hold some higher degree or happen to be an expert in evolutionary theory to whom I should defer? I am not a creationist trying to tear apart evolution, but a scientist trying to scientifically discuss the article. As such, my comments should not be quickly dismissed, but should be answered. I made the suggestion that there are many verified methods of falsifiability, which have been in either peer-reviewed journal articles or stated by Darwin himself (I believe this post was deleted, but I can provide them and their references to help out this section, btw I can find at least four or five, which is more than are currently listed, but are actually correct). This article listed none of these methods of falsifiability in the section labeled falsifiability. I don’t want creationism taught in school. One of the methods of falsifiability this article mentions requires a deity. This opens up Pandora’s box. How easily could a creationist say “What’s good for the goose is good for the gander?” If a deity can be used for falsifiability (the cornerstone of a scientific theory), then obviously it is allowed into science. If it is allowed into science, then keeping creationism and ID out is not justifiable. Do not give creationists such an easy target. Other methods mentioned in the article, I easily disputed using only the definition of falsifiability found at wiki, among other places. While you (in general) have dismissed my claims as being SYN, you could not break the logic used nor provide an argument as to why I might be wrong. This is like shooting fish in a barrel and you are giving creationists the ammo to do so. How much ammo do you want to give them? Royboy, first the definition of chimera they are using has change from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera_(genetics) so the definition has already changed, because these exist. Beyond that, evolution does not inherently predict that there are no chimeras as long as the lineage can be traced back and it was advantageous to have say a lion’s head and a horse’s body. And as for the genetic variation being easily verified, how would this be done? Our knowledge of genetic coding is very limited, and is certainly not to the point of finding the small changes that would appear relatively quickly in a population as you are suggesting. The number of microarrays involved would be cost prohibitive and lead large error rates that would only find very large genetic anomalies. Beyond that, reason would dictate that mankind as been relatively the same for a million years, thus these are very slow processes. In fact, I think you could be the first evolutionist I have ever heard, that is suggesting that these are quick processes. I am playing devil’s advocate, because I have found that it is the best way to truly test the validity of what is being stated and this is the scientific way. Look again at my previous posts (at least the posts that have not been deleted), not only do I say what section needs to be changed and why, but I have “quoted reliable sources that throw doubt on some aspects of the article”. I have no peer-reviewed journal article stating that these methods of falsifiability are wrong because nobody has a peer-reviewed journal article stating that they are correct, so why would anybody argue against a point that hasn’t been made? I may be able to find some creationist webpage, but I don’t want that in the article either. You may be right that I am committing SYN, but these are relatively simple arguments that can easily be made by others. I’m not trying to denigrate evolution, so there would be no point to making an article called “Are objections to evolution valid”. I just want science to prevail. Make arguments strong and scientifically justifiable or they will be used as weapons to attack evolution. I believe that the section on falsifiability needs to be overhauled and carefully reconsidered, this is the wiki wringer you are mentioning Quietmark, my posts are part of that. I’m not asking it to be overhauled right now, but I think it does need to happen. This, however, I leave to your (collective) judgment. If you would like me to review or help out, I am willing to do so, but only by email or talk. I will not be editing this site or discussion page again. It is my opinion that fair scientific discussion is not prevailing here, as nearly all of my material have been deleted or archived. Sorry it took so long to post this response, a user within this article had me blocked.	0.001115	0	0
RT @itskingdee: @1inkkofrosess fuck them hoes! I have bigger problems like do you cook at your house lol	0.997895	1	1
" Please do not intentionally introduce incorrect information to pages, as you did with this edit to Bagel. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. "	0.000562	0	0
😭😭😭 RT @VineForTheByrd: Bae: go text your hoes Me: https://t.co/5PAfEceL1i	0.090429	0	1
I think way too many people that read this are missing the point. The problem with satire is that occasionally people are too dense to recognize it as being such. Grutness never suggests that this is anything except a statement about a certain facet of Wikipedia with a dose of humor and irony mixed in for fun. 71.177.160.136	0.001336	0	0
" Am sending it now! Sorry for late response! '''''' my talk page! "	0.000714	0	0
@user @user And what do you think Ron desantis is going to do for you? He's probably in the back pocket of the NRA!! Good luck getting anything done as far as gun control because that is what we'r seriously need as a country! We need tougher background checks at least!!	0.017699	0	1
Couldn't care less about any bitch 👏	0.912243	1	1
Support per nom. The article as it stands is about the toys themselves, not about Mettoy, the company; whether or not we should have a separate article on the company is another matter, but this article currently does not cover it.	0.000606	0	0
I know there are still a lot of red links, but maybe these could be created as stubs.	0.000627	0	0
" Racism I want to commend you for your brilliant solution to fixing the problem in the final sentence of the section, with ""warm praise."" "	0.006549	0	0
Begging pardon for dropping in, but how about just Examination under infrared light reveals minor pentimenti, without the parenthetic clause that now follows?	0.000728	0	0
RT @MayaAngelouFRO: Ready to slay these bitches and im not even half way thew my soak http://t.co/uKCdyM7kbx	0.99412	1	1
This is a dynamic IP used by many owned by few	0.001106	0	0
" A tag has been placed on Venutoise, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-•MyEars•MyMouth-timed "	0.000661	0	0
Idk why bitches think they players lol bitches have zero game	0.986247	1	1
No, it doesn't. It needs to be organized.	0.000661	0	0
@ItsLenDaddy thanks bruh dont ever forget we still on the look out for these faggots ................................. @JustCurrieOn	0.779698	1	1
Kathleen Andrews Submission Hi Ritchie333, I would like to thank you for helping me submit Kathleen Andrews legacy to Wikipedia. Wow!!!!! You Made my day as I've been trying for a very long time!! THANK YOU!!! Im very new to Wikipedia, so I am not sure how to do this but in Kathleen Andrews story, it listed her as First Female Dispatcher, and thats true, but she was also the First Female ETS Bus Operator, First Female Dispatcher and First Female in ETS Management. The emphasis on the First female Bus Operator should be first, if that's possible. I look forward to hearing from you and a BIG THANK YOU for all of your help!!! Take care Lisa Andrews	0.000627	0	0
The Internet will make you think these bitches are who they're actually not.	0.96134	1	1
It is just like synthpop being a precursor to techno. Synthpop is white music whilst Techno is black music. Radio Babylon is dub, it provides typical dub technique (small room/overreverbed room), and the only thing it can be called 'dnb' for is the combination of percusion with k-s-k-s-.. rhythm, which is hardly an invention of MBM. Four arguments to Radio Babylon opposition are: MBM is an experimental band. (there has been already noted somewhere that Kraftwerk's 'Radioactivity' was once 'recognized' a first dubstep track by some) Dub is a genre of vast (Can you definetely state no simillar dubtrack has been written just before /or much before Radio Babylon?) MBM's track isn't related to Rave, as Dub (or reverb technique) isn't related to Rave Two years passed till another tracks of jungle have appeared if Radio Babylon is considered a first track. Arguments in favour are: MBM are British, so they are connected somehow to British Rave scene. Track's rhythm is quite a simillarity with jungle music rhythms. Second argument is like 'drumfunk was created in the times jazz/funk drum improvisations appeared (20s to 60s)'. The first argument is weak without the second one. One more argument that MBM's track is sampled in some jungle tracks as a straight shortcut to jungle music roots according to creators of those tracks. But it is quite a pov argument. I don't know the roots of Rave, the scene was dominantly white, and the guy who brought acid house to UK was white too. But who started using 45rpm breakbeat over 4-tofloor is enigma to me personally. Black music may be considered a 'racial term', therefore i think you'll enjoy more politcorrect one: 'Pop music genre created by black people of African/Carribean (may be also Indian) origin'. I asure, no one here wants it to start any racial war. 82.209.225.33	0.004464	0	0
" WP:BLP/WP:OR violations I removed the following passage because it is a clear violation of both RP:BLP and WP:OR and makes extensive use of weasel words. But some suspect that Erdogan's virulent attacks on Israel are rooted in anti-semitism and hostility towards Jews. In Turkey, according to a survey in early October 2009, 53 percent of the population would object to having a Jewish neighbor. He has been accused of exploiting such prejudice for political gains: On October 8, 2009, he stated in a speech at the Yildiz Technical University of Istanbul that he has been watching ""the Jewish model of success"", pointing to ""their [the Jews'] buisness instinct"", and claiming that ""Jews are able to make their money multilply while seated.""En Turquie, le premier ministre, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, exploite un sentiment d'hostilité vis-à-vis d'Israël (Le Monde, October 19, 2009) Describing Erdogan's criticism of Israel as ""virulent"" is a NPOV violation (nor is it meaningful English). Quoting survey results about the opinions of Turkish citizens is WP:SYNTH and irrelevant to Erdogan's own beliefs. Also, nothing that is quoted is actually negative about Jews. "	0.004306	0	0
My duck got big as fuck. Yes, duck, like the bird.	0.974566	1	1
Pecher's additions to the artcile - The new sections Highly subjective and inappropriate for Wikipedia as it is, as pointed out by other users, loosely based on unverifiable sources. Currently, these new sections are in breach of WP:V, NPOV and WP:OR. I will try to trim/remove some of the controversial claims untill sources have been legitimately referenced by citations that meet Verifiability standards as speculatios has no place on Wikipedia. However, these new new sections (especially Safavids) need to be rewritten, as the basic interface is far away from being encyclopedic.	0.000786	0	0
I will murder your pets and slash your tires. You are such a giant assclown. My name is Byran Mattison and I am a gay football player. I play for the Ravens and I love dick.	0.994576	1	1
Dick Head José Eduardo dos Santos What seems to be the problem with your friend Dos Santos	0.757505	1	0
Nihang and Akali Please note that Akali and Nihang are not same thing. In fact they differ as much as sky and earth.	0.000636	0	0
They had a steak category. Ran that bitch like a busto.	0.984456	1	1
Hi TallMagic. Thank you for your comments and help. I thought I gave reliable information by providing proper URL. You see, I firmly believe that Breyer's is NOT a diploma mill as defined by several sources. They do follow processes of an on-line education sources. Could you help me how I could interject this into the wikipedia? Thanks!	0.000554	0	0
, 19 November 2012 (UTC) Well I've done some more, including Stronhold. Someone already uploaded Tempest. Here's the difficult ones for me: Ice Age, Portal, Portal Second Age, Exodus, Avacyn Restored, Gatecrash, and Wizard's Maze. A lot of the Duel Decks, From the Vaults, and Premium Deck stuff will be challenging as well. All of these are ones I will not be touching for a long while. 20:23	0.000572	0	0
February 2006 (UTC) It should be noted that Chadbryant is currently engaging in an edit war that is a clear violation of the condition of your unblocking of his person. 18:03, 8	0.000897	0	0
THANK YOU AND GOOD NIGHT.	0.000534	0	0
Roilo Golez Hi, I see you're having trouble writing the biography of Roilo Golez, it will be wise to re-write his biography in your own words. And by the way please cite your references, we are also on the look out for biased articles. Go over this WP:POV. This is what happened to the author of Vicente Magsaysay's article [2007]. (Talk \| contribs)	0.00066	0	0
" Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. andemu "	0.00081	0	0
Who the fuck puts a block of cheese in they room without a refrigerator ghetto ass niggas eases, like that's just the thing to do wrong.	0.99815	1	1
RT @vodkapapixo: Black girls have never been into me. I guess cause I don't call them hoes, sell drug's or shoot niggas o well.	0.952133	1	0
HEY, ITS JUST MAH TALK PAGE That's all silly!	0.725753	1	1
" Orphaned fair use image (Image:Worldcup98classicscreenshot.jpg) Thanks for uploading Image:Worldcup98classicscreenshot.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. (talk) (email) (Contr.) "	0.000553	0	0
@TomMahoney91 what now bitch	0.988043	1	1
This is a public computer Hi, I have a slight idea who posted from here previously and would request that no ban be put on it (this internet connection is in an educational institution with a lot of rather 'immature' people using it). thanks. 68.215.218.14	0.000742	0	0
Another nigga hoe is another nigga problem. @JoseGuapo been had hits.	0.986515	1	1
Okay, I admit that Lans and Derks may not have written in clear contradiction to what Downton wrote in this respect, but the strong wording by Derks and Van der Lans (accepting Guru Maharaji as a personal saviour) is quite different from Downton.	0.000947	0	0
Braintree Hospital is too vague, which hospital? Also, I believe that South Shore Hospital in Weymouth is closer and probably used more often. 339 area code is in service to help the overflow of the 781 area code. It's possible for any areas with 781 to be issued a 339 number.	0.000582	0	0
I am trying to create a page called Duarte galactosemia and am trying to fix the formatting, insert the hyperlinks (they seem to have been stripped when I pasted in the text from a Word document). I also have two figures I want to insert but cannot see how to do it.	0.000581	0	0
The deletion thing does not say you are unimportant. It says that the article did not show that you were important. There's a difference. It's the article that's being deleted, not you. Look at WP:BAND and WP:BIO - it's usually BAND for any musicians even if they always play solo or if they rap - if you can get through either of those as a pass, then look at WP:RS which is about the reliable independent sources needed to prove it. Then read WP:COI if you are the subject or are closely connected to the subject. Then contact one of us (at the bottom of our talkpage) and we'll advise you on the state of play. Not all people (or bands) get articles (but it seems like every schoolboy group and every rapper tries...). Some, like Bragod, are not in the charting/popular line, but can still have notability. (They didn't write that article, and no, I'm not one of them even though I do have a lyre and can play it.) I only found that you'd been to my userpage by accident - I looked at my watchlist (which I do on occasion). Talkpages flash up a yellow banner so we know there's a message.	0.008278	0	0
" Hoary, you're certainly not a ""celebrity"", nor are you ""famous"". It sounds like jealousy to me. She couldn't care less who you are either because you are no one. And she has a lot more to do than edit on a free editing resource where most amateurs do so to feel important. Get over it. 66.108.7.182 "	0.011417	0	0
hey fred you fucking suck ass u bitch ass motherfucker. u fuckin delete everything you ho. u can take wikipedia and shove it up you ass dumb ass bitch go to hell bastard hope fall in a ditch asshole and you can suck my dick. unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs).	0.998067	1	1
RT @prettychels__: I hate a dumb bitch.	0.994242	1	1
He trolls, edit wars and make personal attacks. Now, can you handle with such a person?	0.001916	0	0
The dust bowl never happened	0.001187	0	0
"This is ridiculous. ""It makes Iranians look stupid""...? Who the fuck are you? A political commentator? An outspoken, self-proclaimed expert on contemporary Iranian politics? Oh right, my pen-name is The Persian Cataphract, so let me try to decipher your next tactical move. The race card? Oh right, your name's not Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson. Let me guess the next one. Nationalist. That's right, you'll throw each and every syllable of content present in my message, in favour of this preconceived straw-man, fallacy and red herring. You'll probably even point to my liberal use of profanity. I just must be nothing else than this lion-and-sun foam-at-mouth Persian nationalist with an inferiority complex spiced with a pinch of victim mentality. And certainly I must be dumb, as you so eloquently have arbitrated above. You said it yourself, right here: ...I am used to being attacked by editors whose very account names show they are here for single-topic pov-pushing. Who do you expect to be neutral on topics of Iranian nationalism? A user called ""IranianGuy"", or a Swiss editor contributing under his real name and no stakes in the matter? Who, for that matter, do you expect to be neutral on topics of Armenian nationalism, an editor called ""AraratArev"" (vel sim.)... Is that how you assess content? By making a shallow assumption on pen-names? Expectations? The God-given right to anonymity on the Internet? How fucking petty are you and the idiot who made you an administrator? What next, are you going to ban Iranians from editing or contributing to Iran-related articles? Indeed not just a laughable policy, but indeed a dangerous one as well. Most of the world-class authorities are Iranians. With your fucked up logic, we should dismiss their contributions because irrespective of their content, you'll instead look at their political affiliations and their names and put it into the bin of rejection. Oh right, you're Swiss and because Switzerland is this shining paragon of neutrality hosting thousands of bank accounts of Islamic terror organization, you're obviously this stereotypical neutralist... Good lord, listen to yourself. Luckily academia doesn't work like that. Scholarly enterprise and political affiliations remain strictly separated. So it doesn't really matter if Kaveh Farrokh or anyone else is a self-declared outspoken Nazi, Communist, Socialist, Liberal, Conservative or what have you, it has no bearing on content that must be assessed purely by content. That's NPOV. A sober, neutral, objective approach, just bare-bones, bare-knuckles source critique. Source. Critique. Make an assessment on the content, not the person(s). You marginalized IranianGuy. Period. And as conveniently as you shrugged him off because of his pen-name, you shrugged off his fully legitimate criticism of your approach. No matter what country or pen-name or real name you have, it has a universal stamp: Asshole behaviour. "	0.984319	1	1
Only tweet me if that pussy got superpowers	0.983166	1	1
eat a dick and fuck off	0.997417	1	1
"It's funny how the first people to throw around ""possible motives"" are always the ones who get it absolutely wrong. They get it so completely wrong with all their guesses it's almost as if they weren't guesses at all, but intentional deception. It's pretty obvious at this point to anyone who can think that this guy Ivins was a Mossad asset. He was a Jew carrying out a false-flag operation as Jews do, he pretended to be a muslim terrorist, he and his government pals wanted to...remove...a certain muslim researcher, while manufacturing some more fear of muslim ""terrorism"" to get the American goyim more enthusiastic about letting themselves be slaughtered in Jew wars for Israel. Oh, you thought your ""soldiers"" use those pathetically insufficient body armors and faulty rifles cuz there's not enough money? And so it goes. I'm not ruling out the possibility that this Ivins guy and his Zionist Bolshevist friends do this sort of stuff just as naturally as lions eat sheep, instinctively, but there may have been another motive for it as well. They don't want their enemies, muslims and other goyim, standing around when they're developing sophisticated biological weapons to take out entire races of humans, perhaps only sparing the God's Chosen, the Master Race by any other name. The Jews were the real ""Nazis"" all along. Fools. "	0.490238	1	0
]] again. We don't use Mr, Mrs, Ms, or Miss in infoboxes unless the gender is not obvious. See WP:WPSCHOOLS/AG#IB. Your change of the teacher ratio is not sourced, and you changed my sourced number without changing the valid, cited ref. You cannot change a properly cited piece of information and claim that it came from the same reference. If you have a different, better source, then use it. Otherwise leave the number alone. Furthermore, you should be using valid edit summaries. You claimed that many of your edits were typo corrections when they were clearly not.	0.000667	0	0
fuckin crikey fuck off ya fuckin bloke. Crikey.	0.998045	1	1
RT @RO4reals: <--- trash at it's finest “@NichyTay: Ladies if you post a picture and don't get at least 15 niggas to favorite it then you t…	0.843259	1	1
Checkuser is not absolutely exactly about this point!	0.000895	0	0
A block user stating his forgiveness. uh hi, I'm User:67.164.35.55 (sorry if my grammer is terrible, I'm am not good at Language Arts). I'm sorry about the vandalism, I thought that by delecting content on Template:Final Fantasy series (which I accidently delectly Others on template and since the rest of the text I delected didn't need to be included (they are minor links) ) and Boktai (which I the Django section was already in the article Characters in the Boktai series) would be ok and I didn't want that to in my talk page. and I guess my temper got a hold of me. so I hope you'll read this so you will understand my forgiveness.	0.002496	0	0
" I'd rather a more generic ""Response"" or ""Reaction to"" type article. If you don't mind I'll tinker with it later but for now I have to go to work. "	0.000725	0	0
Until now, the cases when i was partially wrong where extremely few. this happens when you use RSs.	0.000794	0	0
My niccas was too Real fa these Streets #RIP Ike #Free Nwax http://t.co/0a2dy3vZkm	0.009944	0	1
" Good work The Tireless Contributor Barnstar Excellent job with your work on Statewide legislative elections in the United States, 2010. Continue the good work! "	0.000544	0	0
Yeah Nigga.know what i'm talking 'bout bitch	0.992851	1	1
Lighting my pretty ass up w them yellow stars lls	0.982377	1	1
" No, you should not. You should reference ""Bill of Attainder"". "	0.00065	0	0
one fly ass bitch	0.997408	1	1
Crohnie, I don't know exactly what you're talking about, so I'm a little puzzled by the message you left me, but that's fine. I just wanted to let you know that you don't need to feel bad about withdrawing your offer. It's ok, and I hope you are ok too.	0.00081	0	0
Where is the Results by county/parish Map? I'd looked this page today, i see difference, there was April primaries added (which is good) but, the thing that makes me confused is the Map Showing the results of 2012 GOP Primaries which is gone. Can Anyone Return backed that map.	0.000578	0	0
OH SHUT UP YOU FUCCIN ASSHOLE! ( )	0.997899	1	1

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. (talk)

0.000529

0

April .... are you gay? If you block or delete this of course, then you are obviously homophobic.

0.967248

1

I think its very unfair to compare my edits with those of Tbma/YMB29, first i have been the main contributor to this article, i have seeked the sources/ disscused in discusion all in line to improve this article, this is not the case with Tbma/YMB29 who just last week consider the whole article a hoax, also today i really displined myself not doing any of the previuslly acts of misconduct, so i think your crttisism of me is utterlly unfair.

0.002123

0

"::::""The Rapture: Hoax or Hype?"" That's about as big a violation of NPOV as one can get. That is certainly a useful guide... of what to avoid. We've covered all the POVs here, including the fact that Amillenialists and Post-Millenialists are less likely to use the term than Historic Premillenialists, even though their formulation of the doctrine with the Second Coming is virtually identical. That's about as good as we can do here. But ""hoax or hype"" writing isn't something Wikipedia is meant to do. "

0.000673

0

Shelly Shock Shelly Shock is. . .( )

0.000824

0

Alzira Peirce controversy Since you've blocked me for my criticism of [email protected] re the Alzira Peirce article I'd like to draw your attention to evidence of [email protected] track record of abusing editor role available at http://www.questpedia.org/en/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/[email protected], http://en.wikipedia.atpedia.com/en/articles/r/e/q/[email protected]_b1fd.html.

0.000752

0

{{help me}} How may I help? | (Talk)

0.000634

0

To answer your first question about percentage amount: The third line for 1990-2000 (35-50%) was turned into 40-60%, while the forth line for 2000-present (50-75%)] was turned into 60-80%. So we still have equal amounts overall. To answer your second question: We currently don't have [Page 2] anymore, it was created at one point but it was re-merged with the original. And the main reason we decided to trip the bottom 20 million is because the list had passed 350,000 bytes. For many months ahead, we won't be modifying the length of the list. And we may never will if we manage to keep the bytes around 250,000.

0.000608

0

Welcome back. Here is a crapping cat, a universal symbol of relief. vzaak

0.503244

1

Its not the same thing. Whatsoever. This article is pitiful and misleading

0.093343

0

" I don't think the Kirby anime is canonical. (talk) 21:24, August 27, 2005 (UTC)"

0.000598

0

" Pro Moldovan?? What in hell!!! do I have to do with those communists??? I doubt that you didn`t already knew, but the current Moldovan communist regime, doesn`t even recognise veterans of the Trns war, and says that they were ""victims of Romanian fascist propaganda""... No big difference between Smirnov and Voronin. Both alogene colonists, both use polical ideology for personal benefits, both primitive, etc "

0.748814

1

@MrRedMartian this pic is trash. D!ck is dry af.

0.986054

1

RT @larryelder: Holder asks, "What AG has had to deal with that kind of treatment?” Tell the whiny little bitch to call Alberto Gonzales an…

0.733407

1

Can't you at least have the common courtesy to answer my question, or do you just want to be a jerk?

0.77408

1

" ...yeah, I did make a balls up of it. Sorry about that. Back to school for me... inspect damage⁄berate "

0.008233

0

I called. In to work n bitch said they might not want me to go back

0.907277

1

shut the hell up Zabrak Dragong4

0.896813

1

RT @ToriJBerman: @_VintageVixen lmao bummy bitches

0.978133

1

By the way you and everyone else like you are an absolute disgrace. You're hypocrits and are barriers to freedom of expression - why does wikipedia bother to blackout in protest to PIPA and SOPA when it doesn't allow information on its website anyway. As for you shimgray you're sad, pathetic and spineless; you take satisfaction from deleting other articles and generally feeling self important, as a result. You will clearly never be of any importance or notability thus you feel it is your right to try and be so via your menial control over an electronic encyclopedia. Rot in hell. I wish you a slow, painful death, hopefully very soon.

0.970344

1

Wow, that's like six-million times better than the stub I put together. Nice work, guys. -

0.000579

0

Never that serious RT @C_thaqueen: Thought you was Finna cruise with a new bitch 😩🔑🔪✋? http://t.co/MvCnPYtXo8

0.868173

1

I'm not foolish you mother is foolish you prick and replay to me on my account not on my IP!- Your such a nerd with acne that will probally die alone (thats a shame) thinking your all cool going on wikipedia everyday of your life and not doing anything if your a teenager that just makes it worse . -

0.981801

1

RT @mckooley: shimmy shimmy ya bitch

0.993813

1

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to 311 (band). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.

0.00071

0

🏆 RT @UBoyRock17: Every bitch n my passenger seat I dun fucked at least one time

0.996721

1

Jonica look like a hoe from 55th and superior 😂😂

0.283705

1

I got some bitch ass coworkers. I stay late every day last week I don't complain about them mfs. They stay late they send emails that I left

0.973652

1

Quoting or referring to photographers as support for the assertion that photography belongs in the fine arts shows me that the author of this page knows nothing about the subject. What kind of idiot do you take me for?

0.288629

1

0

IT IS TRUE! ASK A LOCAL! Seriously, us Aylesfordians HATE it when people say our dear village, which was the first in the UK, covers Larkfield, Eccles and all of that other shit. THOSE ARE SEPERATE VILLAGES. AND THAT'S FINAL. 94.168.95.164

0.836386

1

Johnuniq and Quietmark, This is my last response. I do not have a problem with how you handled the discussion page and I appreciate the polite responses. I brought up my PhD in statistics because a contributor thought it would be appropriate to just delete my discussion, so I wanted to know why they felt that was within their purview. Do they hold some higher degree or happen to be an expert in evolutionary theory to whom I should defer? I am not a creationist trying to tear apart evolution, but a scientist trying to scientifically discuss the article. As such, my comments should not be quickly dismissed, but should be answered. I made the suggestion that there are many verified methods of falsifiability, which have been in either peer-reviewed journal articles or stated by Darwin himself (I believe this post was deleted, but I can provide them and their references to help out this section, btw I can find at least four or five, which is more than are currently listed, but are actually correct). This article listed none of these methods of falsifiability in the section labeled falsifiability. I don’t want creationism taught in school. One of the methods of falsifiability this article mentions requires a deity. This opens up Pandora’s box. How easily could a creationist say “What’s good for the goose is good for the gander?” If a deity can be used for falsifiability (the cornerstone of a scientific theory), then obviously it is allowed into science. If it is allowed into science, then keeping creationism and ID out is not justifiable. Do not give creationists such an easy target. Other methods mentioned in the article, I easily disputed using only the definition of falsifiability found at wiki, among other places. While you (in general) have dismissed my claims as being SYN, you could not break the logic used nor provide an argument as to why I might be wrong. This is like shooting fish in a barrel and you are giving creationists the ammo to do so. How much ammo do you want to give them? Royboy, first the definition of chimera they are using has change from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera_(genetics) so the definition has already changed, because these exist. Beyond that, evolution does not inherently predict that there are no chimeras as long as the lineage can be traced back and it was advantageous to have say a lion’s head and a horse’s body. And as for the genetic variation being easily verified, how would this be done? Our knowledge of genetic coding is very limited, and is certainly not to the point of finding the small changes that would appear relatively quickly in a population as you are suggesting. The number of microarrays involved would be cost prohibitive and lead large error rates that would only find very large genetic anomalies. Beyond that, reason would dictate that mankind as been relatively the same for a million years, thus these are very slow processes. In fact, I think you could be the first evolutionist I have ever heard, that is suggesting that these are quick processes. I am playing devil’s advocate, because I have found that it is the best way to truly test the validity of what is being stated and this is the scientific way. Look again at my previous posts (at least the posts that have not been deleted), not only do I say what section needs to be changed and why, but I have “quoted reliable sources that throw doubt on some aspects of the article”. I have no peer-reviewed journal article stating that these methods of falsifiability are wrong because nobody has a peer-reviewed journal article stating that they are correct, so why would anybody argue against a point that hasn’t been made? I may be able to find some creationist webpage, but I don’t want that in the article either. You may be right that I am committing SYN, but these are relatively simple arguments that can easily be made by others. I’m not trying to denigrate evolution, so there would be no point to making an article called “Are objections to evolution valid”. I just want science to prevail. Make arguments strong and scientifically justifiable or they will be used as weapons to attack evolution. I believe that the section on falsifiability needs to be overhauled and carefully reconsidered, this is the wiki wringer you are mentioning Quietmark, my posts are part of that. I’m not asking it to be overhauled right now, but I think it does need to happen. This, however, I leave to your (collective) judgment. If you would like me to review or help out, I am willing to do so, but only by email or talk. I will not be editing this site or discussion page again. It is my opinion that fair scientific discussion is not prevailing here, as nearly all of my material have been deleted or archived. Sorry it took so long to post this response, a user within this article had me blocked.

0.001115

0

RT @itskingdee: @1inkkofrosess fuck them hoes! I have bigger problems like do you cook at your house lol

0.997895

1

" Please do not intentionally introduce incorrect information to pages, as you did with this edit to Bagel. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. "

0.000562

0

😭😭😭 RT @VineForTheByrd: Bae: go text your hoes Me: https://t.co/5PAfEceL1i

0.090429

0

1

I think way too many people that read this are missing the point. The problem with satire is that occasionally people are too dense to recognize it as being such. Grutness never suggests that this is anything except a statement about a certain facet of Wikipedia with a dose of humor and irony mixed in for fun. 71.177.160.136

0.001336

0

" Am sending it now! Sorry for late response! '''''' my talk page! "

0.000714

0

@user @user And what do you think Ron desantis is going to do for you? He's probably in the back pocket of the NRA!! Good luck getting anything done as far as gun control because that is what we'r seriously need as a country! We need tougher background checks at least!!

0.017699

0

1

Couldn't care less about any bitch 👏

0.912243

1

Support per nom. The article as it stands is about the toys themselves, not about Mettoy, the company; whether or not we should have a separate article on the company is another matter, but this article currently does not cover it.

0.000606

0

I know there are still a lot of red links, but maybe these could be created as stubs.

0.000627

0

" Racism I want to commend you for your brilliant solution to fixing the problem in the final sentence of the section, with ""warm praise."" "

0.006549

0

Begging pardon for dropping in, but how about just Examination under infrared light reveals minor pentimenti, without the parenthetic clause that now follows?

0.000728

0

RT @MayaAngelouFRO: Ready to slay these bitches and im not even half way thew my soak http://t.co/uKCdyM7kbx

0.99412

1

This is a dynamic IP used by many owned by few

0.001106

0

" A tag has been placed on Venutoise, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-•MyEars•MyMouth-timed "

0.000661

0

Idk why bitches think they players lol bitches have zero game

0.986247

1

No, it doesn't. It needs to be organized.

0.000661

0

@ItsLenDaddy thanks bruh dont ever forget we still on the look out for these faggots ................................. @JustCurrieOn

0.779698

1

Kathleen Andrews Submission Hi Ritchie333, I would like to thank you for helping me submit Kathleen Andrews legacy to Wikipedia. Wow!!!!! You Made my day as I've been trying for a very long time!! THANK YOU!!! Im very new to Wikipedia, so I am not sure how to do this but in Kathleen Andrews story, it listed her as First Female Dispatcher, and thats true, but she was also the First Female ETS Bus Operator, First Female Dispatcher and First Female in ETS Management. The emphasis on the First female Bus Operator should be first, if that's possible. I look forward to hearing from you and a BIG THANK YOU for all of your help!!! Take care Lisa Andrews

0.000627

0

The Internet will make you think these bitches are who they're actually not.

0.96134

1

It is just like synthpop being a precursor to techno. Synthpop is white music whilst Techno is black music. Radio Babylon is dub, it provides typical dub technique (small room/overreverbed room), and the only thing it can be called 'dnb' for is the combination of percusion with k-s-k-s-.. rhythm, which is hardly an invention of MBM. Four arguments to Radio Babylon opposition are: MBM is an experimental band. (there has been already noted somewhere that Kraftwerk's 'Radioactivity' was once 'recognized' a first dubstep track by some) Dub is a genre of vast (Can you definetely state no simillar dubtrack has been written just before /or much before Radio Babylon?) MBM's track isn't related to Rave, as Dub (or reverb technique) isn't related to Rave Two years passed till another tracks of jungle have appeared if Radio Babylon is considered a first track. Arguments in favour are: MBM are British, so they are connected somehow to British Rave scene. Track's rhythm is quite a simillarity with jungle music rhythms. Second argument is like 'drumfunk was created in the times jazz/funk drum improvisations appeared (20s to 60s)'. The first argument is weak without the second one. One more argument that MBM's track is sampled in some jungle tracks as a straight shortcut to jungle music roots according to creators of those tracks. But it is quite a pov argument. I don't know the roots of Rave, the scene was dominantly white, and the guy who brought acid house to UK was white too. But who started using 45rpm breakbeat over 4-tofloor is enigma to me personally. Black music may be considered a 'racial term', therefore i think you'll enjoy more politcorrect one: 'Pop music genre created by black people of African/Carribean (may be also Indian) origin'. I asure, no one here wants it to start any racial war. 82.209.225.33

0.004464

0

" WP:BLP/WP:OR violations I removed the following passage because it is a clear violation of both RP:BLP and WP:OR and makes extensive use of weasel words. But some suspect that Erdogan's virulent attacks on Israel are rooted in anti-semitism and hostility towards Jews. In Turkey, according to a survey in early October 2009, 53 percent of the population would object to having a Jewish neighbor. He has been accused of exploiting such prejudice for political gains: On October 8, 2009, he stated in a speech at the Yildiz Technical University of Istanbul that he has been watching ""the Jewish model of success"", pointing to ""their [the Jews'] buisness instinct"", and claiming that ""Jews are able to make their money multilply while seated.""En Turquie, le premier ministre, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, exploite un sentiment d'hostilité vis-à-vis d'Israël (Le Monde, October 19, 2009) Describing Erdogan's criticism of Israel as ""virulent"" is a NPOV violation (nor is it meaningful English). Quoting survey results about the opinions of Turkish citizens is WP:SYNTH and irrelevant to Erdogan's own beliefs. Also, nothing that is quoted is actually negative about Jews. "

0.004306

0

My duck got big as fuck. Yes, duck, like the bird.

0.974566

1

Pecher's additions to the artcile - The new sections Highly subjective and inappropriate for Wikipedia as it is, as pointed out by other users, loosely based on unverifiable sources. Currently, these new sections are in breach of WP:V, NPOV and WP:OR. I will try to trim/remove some of the controversial claims untill sources have been legitimately referenced by citations that meet Verifiability standards as speculatios has no place on Wikipedia. However, these new new sections (especially Safavids) need to be rewritten, as the basic interface is far away from being encyclopedic.

0.000786

0

I will murder your pets and slash your tires. You are such a giant assclown. My name is Byran Mattison and I am a gay football player. I play for the Ravens and I love dick.

0.994576

1

Dick Head José Eduardo dos Santos What seems to be the problem with your friend Dos Santos

0.757505

1

0

Nihang and Akali Please note that Akali and Nihang are not same thing. In fact they differ as much as sky and earth.

0.000636

0

They had a steak category. Ran that bitch like a busto.

0.984456

1

Hi TallMagic. Thank you for your comments and help. I thought I gave reliable information by providing proper URL. You see, I firmly believe that Breyer's is NOT a diploma mill as defined by several sources. They do follow processes of an on-line education sources. Could you help me how I could interject this into the wikipedia? Thanks!

0.000554

0

, 19 November 2012 (UTC) Well I've done some more, including Stronhold. Someone already uploaded Tempest. Here's the difficult ones for me: Ice Age, Portal, Portal Second Age, Exodus, Avacyn Restored, Gatecrash, and Wizard's Maze. A lot of the Duel Decks, From the Vaults, and Premium Deck stuff will be challenging as well. All of these are ones I will not be touching for a long while. 20:23

0.000572

0

February 2006 (UTC) It should be noted that Chadbryant is currently engaging in an edit war that is a clear violation of the condition of your unblocking of his person. 18:03, 8

0.000897

0

THANK YOU AND GOOD NIGHT.

0.000534

0

Roilo Golez Hi, I see you're having trouble writing the biography of Roilo Golez, it will be wise to re-write his biography in your own words. And by the way please cite your references, we are also on the look out for biased articles. Go over this WP:POV. This is what happened to the author of Vicente Magsaysay's article [2007]. (Talk | contribs)

0.00066

0

" Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. andemu "

0.00081

0

Who the fuck puts a block of cheese in they room without a refrigerator ghetto ass niggas eases, like that's just the thing to do wrong.

0.99815

1

RT @vodkapapixo: Black girls have never been into me. I guess cause I don't call them hoes, sell drug's or shoot niggas o well.

0.952133

1

0

HEY, ITS JUST MAH TALK PAGE That's all silly!

0.725753

1

" Orphaned fair use image (Image:Worldcup98classicscreenshot.jpg) Thanks for uploading Image:Worldcup98classicscreenshot.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. (talk) (email) (Contr.) "

0.000553

0

@TomMahoney91 what now bitch

0.988043

1

This is a public computer Hi, I have a slight idea who posted from here previously and would request that no ban be put on it (this internet connection is in an educational institution with a lot of rather 'immature' people using it). thanks. 68.215.218.14

0.000742

0

Another nigga hoe is another nigga problem. @JoseGuapo been had hits.

0.986515

1

Okay, I admit that Lans and Derks may not have written in clear contradiction to what Downton wrote in this respect, but the strong wording by Derks and Van der Lans (accepting Guru Maharaji as a personal saviour) is quite different from Downton.

0.000947

0

Braintree Hospital is too vague, which hospital? Also, I believe that South Shore Hospital in Weymouth is closer and probably used more often. 339 area code is in service to help the overflow of the 781 area code. It's possible for any areas with 781 to be issued a 339 number.

0.000582

0

I am trying to create a page called Duarte galactosemia and am trying to fix the formatting, insert the hyperlinks (they seem to have been stripped when I pasted in the text from a Word document). I also have two figures I want to insert but cannot see how to do it.

0.000581

0

The deletion thing does not say you are unimportant. It says that the article did not show that you were important. There's a difference. It's the article that's being deleted, not you. Look at WP:BAND and WP:BIO - it's usually BAND for any musicians even if they always play solo or if they rap - if you can get through either of those as a pass, then look at WP:RS which is about the reliable independent sources needed to prove it. Then read WP:COI if you are the subject or are closely connected to the subject. Then contact one of us (at the bottom of our talkpage) and we'll advise you on the state of play. Not all people (or bands) get articles (but it seems like every schoolboy group and every rapper tries...). Some, like Bragod, are not in the charting/popular line, but can still have notability. (They didn't write that article, and no, I'm not one of them even though I do have a lyre and can play it.) I only found that you'd been to my userpage by accident - I looked at my watchlist (which I do on occasion). Talkpages flash up a yellow banner so we know there's a message.

0.008278

0

" Hoary, you're certainly not a ""celebrity"", nor are you ""famous"". It sounds like jealousy to me. She couldn't care less who you are either because you are no one. And she has a lot more to do than edit on a free editing resource where most amateurs do so to feel important. Get over it. 66.108.7.182 "

0.011417

0

hey fred you fucking suck ass u bitch ass motherfucker. u fuckin delete everything you ho. u can take wikipedia and shove it up you ass dumb ass bitch go to hell bastard hope fall in a ditch asshole and you can suck my dick. unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs).

0.998067

1

RT @prettychels__: I hate a dumb bitch.

0.994242

1

He trolls, edit wars and make personal attacks. Now, can you handle with such a person?

0.001916

0

The dust bowl never happened

0.001187

0

"This is ridiculous. ""It makes Iranians look stupid""...? Who the fuck are you? A political commentator? An outspoken, self-proclaimed expert on contemporary Iranian politics? Oh right, my pen-name is The Persian Cataphract, so let me try to decipher your next tactical move. The race card? Oh right, your name's not Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson. Let me guess the next one. Nationalist. That's right, you'll throw each and every syllable of content present in my message, in favour of this preconceived straw-man, fallacy and red herring. You'll probably even point to my liberal use of profanity. I just must be nothing else than this lion-and-sun foam-at-mouth Persian nationalist with an inferiority complex spiced with a pinch of victim mentality. And certainly I must be dumb, as you so eloquently have arbitrated above. You said it yourself, right here: ...I am used to being attacked by editors whose very account names show they are here for single-topic pov-pushing. Who do you expect to be neutral on topics of Iranian nationalism? A user called ""IranianGuy"", or a Swiss editor contributing under his real name and no stakes in the matter? Who, for that matter, do you expect to be neutral on topics of Armenian nationalism, an editor called ""AraratArev"" (vel sim.)... Is that how you assess content? By making a shallow assumption on pen-names? Expectations? The God-given right to anonymity on the Internet? How fucking petty are you and the idiot who made you an administrator? What next, are you going to ban Iranians from editing or contributing to Iran-related articles? Indeed not just a laughable policy, but indeed a dangerous one as well. Most of the world-class authorities are Iranians. With your fucked up logic, we should dismiss their contributions because irrespective of their content, you'll instead look at their political affiliations and their names and put it into the bin of rejection. Oh right, you're Swiss and because Switzerland is this shining paragon of neutrality hosting thousands of bank accounts of Islamic terror organization, you're obviously this stereotypical neutralist... Good lord, listen to yourself. Luckily academia doesn't work like that. Scholarly enterprise and political affiliations remain strictly separated. So it doesn't really matter if Kaveh Farrokh or anyone else is a self-declared outspoken Nazi, Communist, Socialist, Liberal, Conservative or what have you, it has no bearing on content that must be assessed purely by content. That's NPOV. A sober, neutral, objective approach, just bare-bones, bare-knuckles source critique. Source. Critique. Make an assessment on the content, not the person(s). You marginalized IranianGuy. Period. And as conveniently as you shrugged him off because of his pen-name, you shrugged off his fully legitimate criticism of your approach. No matter what country or pen-name or real name you have, it has a universal stamp: Asshole behaviour. "

0.984319

1

Only tweet me if that pussy got superpowers

0.983166

1

eat a dick and fuck off

0.997417

1

"It's funny how the first people to throw around ""possible motives"" are always the ones who get it absolutely wrong. They get it so completely wrong with all their guesses it's almost as if they weren't guesses at all, but intentional deception. It's pretty obvious at this point to anyone who can think that this guy Ivins was a Mossad asset. He was a Jew carrying out a false-flag operation as Jews do, he pretended to be a muslim terrorist, he and his government pals wanted to...remove...a certain muslim researcher, while manufacturing some more fear of muslim ""terrorism"" to get the American goyim more enthusiastic about letting themselves be slaughtered in Jew wars for Israel. Oh, you thought your ""soldiers"" use those pathetically insufficient body armors and faulty rifles cuz there's not enough money? And so it goes. I'm not ruling out the possibility that this Ivins guy and his Zionist Bolshevist friends do this sort of stuff just as naturally as lions eat sheep, instinctively, but there may have been another motive for it as well. They don't want their enemies, muslims and other goyim, standing around when they're developing sophisticated biological weapons to take out entire races of humans, perhaps only sparing the God's Chosen, the Master Race by any other name. The Jews were the real ""Nazis"" all along. Fools. "

0.490238

1

0

]] again. We don't use Mr, Mrs, Ms, or Miss in infoboxes unless the gender is not obvious. See WP:WPSCHOOLS/AG#IB. Your change of the teacher ratio is not sourced, and you changed my sourced number without changing the valid, cited ref. You cannot change a properly cited piece of information and claim that it came from the same reference. If you have a different, better source, then use it. Otherwise leave the number alone. Furthermore, you should be using valid edit summaries. You claimed that many of your edits were typo corrections when they were clearly not.

0.000667

0

fuckin crikey fuck off ya fuckin bloke. Crikey.

0.998045

1

RT @RO4reals: <--- trash at it's finest “@NichyTay: Ladies if you post a picture and don't get at least 15 niggas to favorite it then you t…

0.843259

1

Checkuser is not absolutely exactly about this point!

0.000895

0

A block user stating his forgiveness. uh hi, I'm User:67.164.35.55 (sorry if my grammer is terrible, I'm am not good at Language Arts). I'm sorry about the vandalism, I thought that by delecting content on Template:Final Fantasy series (which I accidently delectly Others on template and since the rest of the text I delected didn't need to be included (they are minor links) ) and Boktai (which I the Django section was already in the article Characters in the Boktai series) would be ok and I didn't want that to in my talk page. and I guess my temper got a hold of me. so I hope you'll read this so you will understand my forgiveness.

0.002496

0

" I'd rather a more generic ""Response"" or ""Reaction to"" type article. If you don't mind I'll tinker with it later but for now I have to go to work. "

0.000725

0

Until now, the cases when i was partially wrong where extremely few. this happens when you use RSs.

0.000794

0

My niccas was too Real fa these Streets #RIP Ike #Free Nwax http://t.co/0a2dy3vZkm

0.009944

0

1

" Good work The Tireless Contributor Barnstar Excellent job with your work on Statewide legislative elections in the United States, 2010. Continue the good work! "

0.000544

0

Yeah Nigga.know what i'm talking 'bout bitch

0.992851

1

Lighting my pretty ass up w them yellow stars lls

0.982377

1

" No, you should not. You should reference ""Bill of Attainder"". "

0.00065

0

one fly ass bitch

0.997408

1

Crohnie, I don't know exactly what you're talking about, so I'm a little puzzled by the message you left me, but that's fine. I just wanted to let you know that you don't need to feel bad about withdrawing your offer. It's ok, and I hope you are ok too.

0.00081

0

Where is the Results by county/parish Map? I'd looked this page today, i see difference, there was April primaries added (which is good) but, the thing that makes me confused is the Map Showing the results of 2012 GOP Primaries which is gone. Can Anyone Return backed that map.

0.000578

0

OH SHUT UP YOU FUCCIN ASSHOLE! ( )

0.997899

1