text
stringlengths 7
5k
| degree_of_toxicity
float64 0
1
| contains_offensive_word
int64 0
1
| label
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|
Cants da coloreds and da white folk gets along? We all be da same cept da colored men gots da bigga dicks | 0.925582 | 1 | 1 |
" bitches get cut off everyday B " | 0.995663 | 1 | 1 |
Sandifer, I'm going BUY my way back into wikipedia. For all your puffery, I'll bet you've never forked over a penny to the cause. And even you have, I'll make your contribution seem like pennies. | 0.642656 | 1 | 1 |
"
FG9
Discussion on LocoNotes about a heavy fuel B-A1A EMD locomotive called the ""FG9"". It was never built. Don Strack started the topic as he has correspondence between EMD and Union Pacific Superintendent of Motive Power Mr. Neuhart. SSW9389 SSW9389 " | 0.000754 | 0 | 0 |
a dippy lunatic like | 0.87437 | 1 | 1 |
Oh no i belive that my responce is very warranted. You it is obvious bu your lack of action, and you action, as well as your own uncivil responce, that you do not respect why i am here. If you did then you would educate your self on what this dispute is about and uphold the the principal that should be the most important one to theis so called project and that is the the purvance of information that corect. As for entitled to reverting, i dont do it becuse i am entitled to do it, i do it becuse it needs to be done, and maybe you should remove your ablilty to revet any pages regardless of what the content is, but being that you have your pouplairty contest postion, that will never be disputed or challanged, i seriously doubt thatyou will. So i can only hope that their are no chnges in the mea time, becus i will change them to uphold the validity of information, regardlessof you ingnorance to the issue. BTW i will not take anything to WP:DR, if i wanted to see an archiac, corupt, and inefficant process, then i would go to my local courthouse. | trácht ar | 0.005419 | 0 | 0 |
Holy shit the retard episode of Wheel of Fortune... AGAIN. Fantastic! | 0.968596 | 1 | 1 |
":::: Pf, I knew that you were paying me a compliment regarding that, but I didn't want to accept such payment when all I was doing was copying out of the dictionary. I do want to point out to SQ, JW and such that one can stand on NPOV with much more confidence when they rely on the dictionary definitions instead of their own opinions. Unless you think you're a lexicographer, relying on the dictionary immunizes yourself from charges of POV.
Now that it looks like some reform is gonna stick, I am much less unsatisfied than I was when I came upon the article back in June or whenever. But it is clunky, designed by committee. I had hoped that enough of you guys would understand the importance of defining time, on the outset, as these two different (and not really competing) definitions, first as a phenomenon (where I drew every word out of the dictionary references, including ""indefinite"" and ""existence"", etc.) and then as a measurement (what Steve Quinn likes to call the ""operational"" definition). And I had hoped that, because measurement is done both with clocks we build (to measure time in material reality) and with our conscious experience (which is debated among philosophers and lay people as to whether or not that is contained in material reality or is somehow different) that you guys (with the exceptions of SQ and JW) would see the wisdom of not jamming them together in a run-on sentence and see the wisdom of setting up the topic in all three major POVs: Time as phenomenon, Time as physical measurement, Time as experience right away in two lede sentences. Everything else in the article will fall under one of those three; ""religion, philosophy, and science... business, industry, sports, the sciences, music, dance, and the live theater"". I am convinced that the professor would grade my lede definition higher than what is there now, and far better than what was there before. Too bad. But the status quo isn't better than what existed before and since I was unsuccessful (even though everything is solidly referenced) in convincing you, I'll let it go. Unless SQ or JW try to crap up the lede again, then I'll be back, and the rest of us also should be vigilant. Maybe someday, this will be a good article. But no matter how well the rest of the article is done, if the lede is crappy, the article as a whole cannot be ""good"".
Bestest, 70.109.183.229
" | 0.012572 | 0 | 0 |
Yes, had seen that and decided to change a few bits and pieces in the article anyway - but have now undone all my changes in the light of your message. | 0.000648 | 0 | 0 |
first thing to do during the zombie outbreak:
sell my hoe | 0.215991 | 1 | 1 |
" August 2006 (UTC)
I disagree by which I mean that when you tell me that I will more often than not find the db casually defined as a member of the violin family, I have NOT found this to be true. People I know casually and not-so-casually define it as a member of the strings and bassists I know are pointed about the fact that they aren't part of the ""violin family"". If I had not found this to be the case, I would never have postulated that the phrase ""modern violin family"" originated in wikipedia. So, now we need some bit of research or some several citations in which professional musicians and/or musicologists refer to the double bass as part of the ""modern violin family"". 02:41, 31" | 0.000572 | 0 | 0 |
"
here is where your sock (and you proudly display the fact that you are a ""sock puppet"" on your user page) Ward, undid the revision completed by Flo Night, you have no right to undo revisions by this person.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:216.240.7.14&diff;=234168217&oldid;=234154700
" | 0.096963 | 0 | 0 |
File:Pandas and ppl.jpg
I have removed the deletion notice. Firstly, I think aiming for the deletion of the image is misguided, as one use is clearly justified, while the other is debatable. Secondly, and more importantly, this deletion is contested in good faith by two longstanding editors (myself, an administrator who deals with a lot of NFCC issues and normally falls on the conservative side, and Hrafn, who is very familiar with the articles in which the image is used) and so it is not really suitable for pseudo-speedy deletion. If you still believe the image should be deleted, I reccomend you take it to IfD. | 0.000634 | 0 | 0 |
If you got a problem with me bring it up with me before I tense up on yo bitch ass . -.- | 0.995642 | 1 | 1 |
Is this a new edict that a secondary source has to establish relevant context? It is not in the extensive Wiki rule book.
So the the Grand Hotel bomb was not an attempt to kill Mrs Thatcher? What crap you spout to confuse O Fenian. Are you such an expert with great military expertise such that you know when no warning bomb is meant to destroy property rther than kill?
You add any other bits from the article you like. I won't object. I try to elucidate not flatter or justify. | 0.204762 | 1 | 0 |
" 04:28, September 6, 2005 (UTC)" | 0.00062 | 0 | 0 |
@RavenPeltier_ @Jesuslovinj @_B_R_Y_C_E_ still a bitch though | 0.970219 | 1 | 1 |
REDIRECT Talk:Today (Melanie Brown song) | 0.000605 | 0 | 0 |
RT @Doyoudream__: Cant spell above and beyond without hoe | 0.063038 | 0 | 1 |
RT @ReverendGrim: God bless those delusional bitches still trying to keep "duck face" alive. | 0.9743 | 1 | 1 |
RT @RabehChararah1: Wack ass hoes | 0.981629 | 1 | 1 |
Even bitches with bad attitudes bumpin to our tunes.. They high maintenance. | 0.925865 | 1 | 1 |
"
Éamonn McCann on RSF and Political Legacy of 1916
ÉRSF 'AUTHENTIC CLAIMANTS TO POLITICAL LEGACY OF 1916 RISING'
WRITING in the Sunday edition of the Derry Journal journalist and author Éamonn McCann said that in his view, as far as Republicanism was concerned, the most authentic claimants to the political legacy of the 1916 Rising were Ruairí Ó Brádaigh and Republican Sinn Féin.
He said: ""The Proclamation didn't promise a fight to achieve the Republic. It proclaimed the Republic as an actually-existing entity. It is for this reason that IRA volunteers ever since have pledged not to strive for the achievement of the Republic but to defend the Republic already achieved. In this perspective, a deal which others might see as a step towards the ultimate objective will be seen as contemptible retreat from the struggle.
""In detaching himself from the Provisionals in 1986 because they'd accepted the legitimacy of the Leinster House parliament, Ó Brádaigh stood by the Republic established on Easter Monday. Looked at from this angle - as legitimate an angle as any other - there is no question: Mr Ó Brádaigh and his followers stand alone in true succession to Easter Week.
""Those of us who stand rights outside the Republican tradition and who take a socialist view also see Easter Week in the perspective of our own politics, see its enduring legacy in the fact that it was a blow against the most powerful Empire on earth at the time, and regard it as self-evident that its spirit is best represented today in the fight against the imperial power of the US ruling class.
""In this view, the most egregious betrayal of 1916 lies not in grudgingly taking seats in a partitionist parliament but in cheerfully breaking bread with George W Bush.""
The Sunday Journal also carried an article entitled ""We're the true inheritors of 1916""' - Derry Republican Sinn Féin"" on page 4.
""Plans by the Irish Government to celebrate the 1916 Easter Rising are hypocritical, a Derry Republican Sinn Féin (RSF) activist has suggested.
Derry based spokesman for the movement, Richard Walsh says that RSF are the only true inheritors of the historic insurrection and the proclamation of independence. He hit out at the 26-County Administration for ""war-crimes"" against those who believed in the ideals of the uprising during the Civil War.
He said: ""There has been much talk of late about the legacy of the Easter Rising of 1916.
""Bertie Ahern has announced plans by the 26-County State to commemorate 1916 with a Free State military parade.
""Let no-one forget that it was the Free State Army that executed four Republican soldiers in Co. Donegal by firing squad in 1923 as a reprisal for Republican military operations. True Republicans commemorate the Drumboe Martyrs at Eastertide every year.
""The Staters were also responsible for many other war-crimes such as the Ballyseedy massacre in Co. Kerry (also in March, 1923), where eight Republican soldiers were killed whilst strapped to a landmine by Free State forces - miraculously leaving one survivor.""
He added that the 26-County government cannot claim ownership to the legacy of the Easter Rising.
""Those who not only betrayed the All-Ireland Republic - proclaimed in arms at Easter 1916, endorsed by the people of Ireland in 1918, and effectively established by Dáil Éireann in January, 1919 - but also actively waged war against it cannot claim the legacy of 1916.
""These people continue to imprison Republicans by using the Special non-jury Court in Dublin - the same building in which Robert Emmet was sentenced to be hanged, drawn and quartered by the English - on the basis of the opinion of the 26-County police [Gardaí].""
He added that the Republican Movement, on the other hand, had ""remained loyal to the Republic of Clarke; Mac Diarmada; Mac Donagh; Pearse; Ceannt; Connolly and Plunkett, and have commemorated the 1916 Rising every year since.
""Those who have maintained this continuity are the true inheritors of the noble ideals of 1916."" " | 0.000733 | 0 | 0 |
Let's see how this goes 😏 lol I'm using my coupon haha kik, dm, text, or if ya down tweet that hoe lolololol http://t.co/BHZRswkIY1 | 0.025399 | 0 | 1 |
, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Lol not gonna help anymore... Penis Brown did his (blow)job... 23:08 | 0.791837 | 1 | 1 |
@user True. But he is a pretty damn good QB though. | 0.138407 | 1 | 0 |
Hi. Yes, I'd noticed. It's always gratifing to know that you've succeeded in enraging a crackpot/troll/content perverter - using nothing more than facts and consistent, rational reasoning - to the point where they view you as a threat worthy of hysterical co-ordinated ad hominem attacks. Still, I can't help feeling a little pity for someone so obviously thoroughly screwed up. It can't be easy having to live with that level of festering anger chewing away at your insides. 01:54, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC) | 0.540141 | 1 | 1 |
Adrienne Shelly
This is directed at you: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adrienne_Shelly&diff;=296721755&oldid;=295519387 Don't be so goddamn lazy. 99.164.68.102 | 0.947702 | 1 | 1 |
Heard you gotta new bitch. See ya postin' up thinkin' that it's making me sick. | 0.965466 | 1 | 1 |
I didn't say anything about a fight Niteshift. You just need to be put in check one way or the other. I'm sure there are many users out there that would agree wholeheartedly. You are an unbelievable dickhead. | 0.813141 | 1 | 1 |
you shoudln't be giving advice on nonchallance when you delete the facts a person adds to the article in a move more akin to vandalism than to anything else, and where's the reply to the beef of my arguments? | 0.018209 | 0 | 0 |
@user I think you say and write more intelligent commentary than most of the hosts at MSNBC. Fake liberals with big corporate blind spots. | 0.18539 | 1 | 1 |
Do you have a source to back this up? | 0.000911 | 0 | 0 |
"
Rebirth (Jennifer Lopez album)
You did the edit i requested wrong, i said put February 15, 2005 as the release date of the second single ""Hold You Down"". But you put February 15 as the release date of the album. can you fix it." | 0.001049 | 0 | 0 |
What´s so Civil about War, anyway?
I always suspected you were a conservative shill, a hack excuse of a wikipedian with a sinister republican agenda set in motion. Support the troops all you want, they have done nothing wrong other than being born in the wrong period of their nations´ history. The war will fail, the seeds that were planted will never blossom and your empire will crumble. George Walker Texas Ranger Bush had an opportunity, an opportunity unlike any man in the past century to instil peace in a fucked up world. Instead, he did what would hopefully create hegemony, unipolarity in a world dying for a multi-polar force...and you were right there behind him....pusssss | 0.648024 | 1 | 1 |
RT @AIlThese: All these clocks and we still don't have time for these hoes http://t.co/oZm4cQe5Me | 0.107783 | 1 | 1 |
RT @sisssyhaymaan: If you brush off a guys compliment just because you have a boyfriend, you're a bitch | 0.985132 | 1 | 1 |
John and Peter Middleton
I've got what I've got in Terry Frost's book from 1988 and David Markhams's Legends book just out, in which only John is featured. | 0.000589 | 0 | 0 |
@equallydestruct bitch firstly it's resting on my titties and secondly if U WAS PAYING ATTENTION YOUD HAVE SEEN WHEN I SAID I ROLLED INTO IT | 0.900002 | 1 | 1 |
Suck it James!
http://manson-haters.blogspot.com
YOU will be featured here next asswipe! Trample on the rights or others until you cream your pants but it won't change a thing. I am above ALL of you! | 0.998141 | 1 | 1 |
there I like to clean this once a month | 0.007227 | 0 | 0 |
I have brought up a Arbcom related to the above behavior and I will assume good faith and drop it if Lightbreather agrees to quit bullying editors by excessive templating and unnecessary Arbcoms. I would also expect that she quit tendetious editing and allow others to edit article without out her trying to own the article. If she can agree to follow these wikipedia rules I will drop my complaint with your permission Drmies. I think that is as reasonable as one can be. 208.54.35.173 | 0.000876 | 0 | 0 |
Stop undoing legitimate edits!
It is a FACT that Pam Bondi is ignoring the will of the voters of Florida, you piece of shit! Stop revising legitimate edits because of your political bias! | 0.976957 | 1 | 1 |
you are personally attacking me, you have personally banned me from posting something I feel is valid for many reasons,You make fun of my reasons don't respond from intelligence and are personally punitive, kind of like an internet terrorist. | 0.284893 | 1 | 1 |
Hello Sms
Hello Smsarmad, you became an enemy of Yasir72.multan in wikipedia. I want to make a serious talk. You are the one, by which I become a sockpuppet. So far I have only one account (Yasir72.multan). Then you blocked me and try to redirect my page (Pakistan Tehwaar Calendar 2013 to List of Festivals in Pakistan). You are resonsible for my enemity with Administrator of Wikipedia. I will continue to irritating you and your talk page until you save my archive page (means not request it for speedy deletion for next time) (User:Yasir72.multan|Yasir72.multan]] 119.160.119.21 | 0.048 | 0 | 0 |
#That son of a bitch moment when your walking through your house in the dark and stub your little toe on the wall | 0.996154 | 1 | 1 |
"
Look here - the admin closed as not abusive enough - what is it I did?
1.This user undid my edit, with an edit summary 'no I don't think so' which seems to breach WP:ESDONTS namely don't 'Make snide comments' or 'Be aggressive' 2.I tried to discuss at User talk:Cassianto but the user was again rather condescending and seemed to be ganging up on me with other users he already knows 3.When discussion began on at Talk:Moors murders, I simply put 'I think it is notable enough for a single line' - however, Cassianto replied 'Then you need to look up the definition of ""notable"", clearly.' (Ignoring WP:NNC) I believe this breaches WP:CIVIL - when I indicated the editor should read WP:CIVIL they replied 'I did once, and I vowed never to read it again' 4.It is breathtaking the way some editors feel policies don't apply to them. I was not rude to the editor, but I was treated in a condescending and arrogant manner over a very minor matter
The user then preceded to launch a very abusive and malicious attack on me. He linked my 710 contributions [166] and entirely falsely wrote 'Not so ridiculous when you look at his contributions which seem to be all geared around the May elections. This user seems to be on a campaign trial on behalf of UKIP'. This is called blatantly misleading other editors, surely in violation of policies such as WP:AGF, WP:BITE, WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. I have nothing to do with UKIP. I am not a member of any political party. I am not enrolled to vote in the United Kingdom. So these are ludicrous allegations. I have created 21 pages, 16 non-related to the elections. Articles I have created such as Endorsements in the United Kingdom general election, 2015 are very important and been widely edited and viewed. I have also created articles such as United Kingdom general election, 2015 (Wales) in accordance with precedent. I have worked hard on the project for good and in good faith. Examples: List of European Union member states by GDP growth and Mr Galloway Goes to Washington. I have successfully nominated dozens of articles for speedy deletion. As a new editor, I am deeply upset by how hard it is to edit this site without abuse and being treated like a moron (WP:BITE). It certainly is not encouraging for those wanting to make a difference in good faith.
Nothing at WP:SPA points to me. 5.The editor has breached multiple policies.
Editor still going. He has written now 'What makes you think I give a fuck about your political leanings?' (despite questioning them) and removed the ANI notification remarking 'what a waste of time'. What is the point of WP:CIVIL, WP:AGF, WP:NPA, WP:BITE?
What did I say that was uncivil? Mellowed Fillmore said 'It is my view that AusLondonder is clearly not here to build an encyclopedia. He is likely to remain a problematic editor and I'm not sure that any more patience needs to be shown' - yet I have created 27 pages including Endorsements in the United Kingdom general election, 2015 and List of European Union member states by GDP growth. How can they possibly say that with your agreement?
I will address each other point at the ANI if you wish. " | 0.000897 | 0 | 0 |
RT @marleylowkey_: “@_100D: All These hoes sooo average 😩😕” of course | 0.056371 | 0 | 1 |
": Why is this 'criticism' even included? It's not substantive. It's just rhetoric and strawman: he writes ""instead of surrendering to the terror"" when obviously no one is suggesting that as a course of action; he claims ""anti-forestry scare tactics"" with no justification or evidence. This section should be deleted.
" | 0.000703 | 0 | 0 |
Don't make vandalism
Don't make vandalism on pages, if you continue your account will be suspended. | 0.014321 | 0 | 0 |
RT @MadeaDonPlay: Call da po po hoe. | 0.078555 | 0 | 1 |
I was not harrassing him
how else am I supposed to find love?81.158.50.39 | 0.005326 | 0 | 0 |
I don't get it. I'm either a pussy or troll. Where is the room for "the truth" and or "my opinions on my TL"????? Social media fucked up. | 0.974802 | 1 | 1 |
I refer to specific work that I do that has nothing to do with wikipedia and certainly not with PJ either. Though I have edited the PJ article you have no more proof that I am involved in PJ than I have that you are involved in the boy and girl chat sites. Zanthalon is Lindsay Ashford while Farenhorst is Voice of Britain, and these accounts are of self-identifying pedophile activists from what I understand, having reviewed all the available material here. | 0.002474 | 0 | 0 |
WikiDicks
Nothing any of you old scholarly wannabe fucks can say about my article will negatively affect me more than this case has.
Have fun with your lame old selves. | 0.97258 | 1 | 1 |
i dont shit talk, i chip talk, dese niggaz jus bitch talk, dese niggaz jus chik stalk, naw i aint got no chik... http://t.co/x6yLjemN | 0.994418 | 1 | 1 |
"
FUTON indeed. I deprodded it because the cited city document spells out a series of reasons to consider the street notable. Confirming additional sources for those may take time and digging, but such sources seem quite likely to exist. I note that a couple of Portland history websites provide promising avenues for research, for anyone able to take up the task. If the quotes at Cafeunknown.com are accurate, the local papers made a succinct case for the notability of the 1925 lighting: ""From the standpoint of illumination per square foot, the Broadway association announces, Broadway will be the best lighted street in the world."" (Sunday Oregonian, November 22, 1925.) ""Gay with iridescent brilliance of the Milky Way, the main boulevard of the City of Roses will burst Tuesday evening into a dazzling orgy of electric rays that will rival the most famous glittering thoroughfares in the world."" (The Portland News, November 24, 1925.)
And PDXHistory.com has an excellent page about Broadway, which perhaps ought to be listed as an external link here. " | 0.001248 | 0 | 0 |
RT @JoeBudden: Back to these hoes tho. | 0.135612 | 1 | 1 |
Thank you for showing interest in editing ancient history pages (we truely need a lot of effort to shape up this site), however wikipedia policy has established that both BC and BCE are equally legitimate dating conventions, and it is not permitted to change dating systems from one to the other en masse. I know opinions are strong on this issue, however this is the policy which has been hammered out over the years, and is not likely to change soon. | 0.000522 | 0 | 0 |
Yes Sir you are right that wikipedia is a place for neutral views. But we are just updating the career information on Sangram singh..We can send you the official emails sent to him and also the website links / youtube links. We are confused why would you undo the updates which are a genuine progress in his career. | 0.000565 | 0 | 0 |
But he's a bitch who made a comment only a bitch would make? ) | 0.989847 | 1 | 1 |
"
list of traps
Why is there not a list of all the Jigsaw traps? They could be catagorized by ""creator"" or by time. That seems encylopedic to me.
" | 0.000719 | 0 | 0 |
Sorry mcd00b but the debate isn't even and fair because the Genesis side has the name without consensus per last rfc and it isn't stable because im here asking for an rfc and ask about once a year as do others, and with their posts being censored and deleted then it clearly isn't even and fair. sergecross that's the whole point there doesn't need to be a new approach or viewpoint presented, peoples minds can change and consensus can change which is why having an rfc would be worth while. 80.192.85.232 | 0.000698 | 0 | 0 |
Fred, shut up you sad old twat, no one is interested in 'i think i'm fucking god' wiki moderators. get a real job you sad little man... | 0.997679 | 1 | 1 |
fuck ya, ya poo brian | 0.997491 | 1 | 1 |
"
Proposed deletion of Mapnik
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mapnik, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? " | 0.000677 | 0 | 0 |
These bitches talking shit but they whisper it? | 0.994824 | 1 | 1 |
Hi, back. I'll leave these bot messages because they are polite and assume good faith. Props to their creators. | 0.001107 | 0 | 0 |
you reported me for nothing and that kew gardens guy is also gonna get block too dumb dumb | 0.925906 | 1 | 1 |
What the fuck did I just say? | 0.98515 | 1 | 1 |
@_NoLackingg I kinda figured a lil bit when u said bitch u cute | 0.969126 | 1 | 1 |
"
April, 2006
Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to New England. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. melmac " | 0.000564 | 0 | 0 |
"
Mkay. Back to my original comment: ""... tagging a page as A1 within two minutes of creation is way too fast. See WP:CSD#A1."" " | 0.000656 | 0 | 0 |
"
Notability of Rockford's Rock Opera
A tag has been placed on Rockford's Rock Opera requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. " | 0.000582 | 0 | 0 |
"::OK, so I made a typo, but it doesn't change the fact that nothing in the heading or in the list is explicitly mentioned in any of the sources. This interpretation of ""control of actions at a distance using mediation"" as meaning psychokinesis, even if true, is of no consequence because PK is not in the list anyway. Neither is levitation. I don't see why it should be so difficult to stick to what we have sources explicitly saying rather than engaging in fanciful connection making like that illustrated below.
" | 0.000628 | 0 | 0 |
Dumb Fuck why did you delete the angry nintendo nerds page? DUMB FUCK | 0.998082 | 1 | 1 |
"
Stupid?
As soon as I saw the phrase ""metal is stupid"" at the very beginning of the article, I assumed I misread it. When I confirmed that it did indeed say ""metal is stupid,"" I then assumed it was vandalism. However, I don't know anything about chemistry (See: Soviet education system) so if the word ""stupid"" has some other meaning in chemistry, I would have no way of knowing or refuting it. Could someone that actually has some amount of knowledge on this subject confirm whether this is or is not vandalism or a typo or what-have-you? " | 0.238756 | 1 | 1 |
RT @GuruJeremy: Hoes use the"it just happened" excuse as a means to cope wit them being a ho. They make it seem as if they had no control o… | 0.011627 | 0 | 1 |
"
This is the text i struggle to post in G.91 page. Just to realize how i want to contribute to wiki, and how someone don't want i do it:
The Aeritalia G.91, also known as the Fiat G.91 and nicknamed Gina, was an light Italian fighter aircraft that was intended to serve as standard equipment for NATO air forces in the 1960s. It was eventually only adopted by three - the Italian Air Force, West Germany's Luftwaffe, and the Portuguese Air Force, but enjoyed a long service life that extended over 35 years.
Development
In 1953, European aircraft manufacturers were invited by NATO to submit aircraft for evaluation for the Light Weight Strike Fighter (LWSF) role. The G.91 was designed to the specification by the famous Italian engineer Giuseppe Gabrielli, hence the ""G"" designation. The competition was intended to produce an aircraft that was light, small, expendable, equipped with basic weapons and avionics and capable of operating with minimal ground support. These specifications were developed for two reasons: the first was the nuclear threat and the other was to counter the trend towards larger and more expensive aircraft.
The technical requirements were:
1,100 m take-off distance over a 15 m obstacle
Capability to operate from grass strips and streets
Max speed of 0.95 Mach
Range of 280 km with 10 min over the target
Armoured protection for the pilot and the fuel tanks
4x12.7 mm or 2x20 mm or 30 mm guns
A maximum of 2,200 kg empty weight and 4,700 kg max weightFerrari 1992, p. 83.
The challengher proposals must had been presented within two months after the request.
The projecting work was only apparently an easy task, because making a very small aircraft yet capable to cover these NATO specifications was difficult.
Fiat Aviazione presented G.91 and so did other competitors with a total of 10 projects, analysed since 18 March by AGARD (Advisory Group for Aeronautical Research and Development), led by Theodore Von Karman. The finalists were declared Breguet Taon, Dassault Etendard, Fiat G.91 and Folland Gnat. Another interesting project was Sud Aviation Badoleur, that solved drastically the problem of a proper landing undercarriage, simply omitted and sobstitued with a landing and take off skid (aircraft was moved in ground operations with a special trailer). This, however, was not ufficially presented to AGARD, that choose, on paper, the Taon as winner.
In the meanwhile, there was the problem of the engine, that must been light yet enough powerful and reliable, with easy and cheap maintenance, like the whole aircraft. The solution was realized by Bristol with the Bristol Orpheus, a simple and effective turbojet. It was adopted to all the finalists, so Bristol will won the contest in every case. G.91R, presented by Fiat, was also called 'little Sabre'. It was due by the knowledge gained with license-production of a modern aircraft, the F-86K, that helped to make much experience with advanced jet aircrafts, . It was similar to F-86 as overall design, but smaller and capable to operate from semi-prepared airstrips.
G.91R was 20% heavier than the estimates and this was due partly to testing hardware, but it was powered by a Bristol Orpheus B.Or 801, 1,800 kg/t.
It was yet capable to supersonic speed in dives, as shown by the flight made in 20 February 1957 when it was able to break the sound barrier four times with 9,000 m dives. His test pilot Riccardo Bignamini, a famous one of that times (he won McKenna Trophy at Empire Test School) was a key element to solve the G.91 shortcomings and the first flight was made in 9 August 1956 at Torino-Caselle airfield.
Few days after it was tested at high speed and at 1,300 m ceiling, but lost control and Bignamini w | 0.000648 | 0 | 0 |
Do you need another soldier in your war on OrphanBot?
Holla atcha homeboy! M. Burmy 11:15 CDT 1 July 2006 (UTC) | 0.022865 | 0 | 0 |
Some bitches just have NO luck with men lmao.. Maybe YOU'RE the problem sweetheart, it can't all be our fault lol | 0.967035 | 1 | 1 |
"
That is precisely what Eeblet intends to do, "". . .dive into talk pages to try to eradicate POV in articles"". POV on talk pages is only a problem when users such as yourself misread discussions or fail to interpret the opinions logically. It's clear to me she understands the purpose of article talk pages, since she did not write anything like your section header here, ""Eliminating POV in Talk Pages"". She said, ""to try to eradicate POV in articles"". " | 0.0008 | 0 | 0 |
Nicki Minaj videography
Thanks for your comments -).
This is the first page I created, so I don't know what exactly makes a good page. Could you look over Nicki Minaj videography and see if improvements can be made? And how do I link it to the Nicki Minaj page?
Thanks in advance if you can help. | 0.000536 | 0 | 0 |
So...
Are you this arrogant and gutless in real life? I am curious. | 0.797036 | 1 | 1 |
@user He is contacting his followers | 0.002604 | 0 | 0 |
Editor review
Thanks for having requested an editor review. A month has passed since it has been posted there, and it has been archived. You can find it at Wikipedia:Editor review/, where you may read last minute additions.
We would really appreciate your help in reviewing a random editor. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. | 0.000508 | 0 | 0 |
"
Since this seems to have blown up spectacularly in my face, I might as well explain my edit. /
I came across this BLP, which hadn't been edited since last year, and noticed that the paragraph about her signing that creationism petition seemed a disjointed and tangential - her signing the petition is unquestionably notable, but it seemed jarring to go straight from discussion of her research to ""In February 2006, the New York Times reported... The petition, a two-sentence statement,"" without stating why she signed the petition or anything. We have an essay about these sorts of articles and the problems with them - WP:COATRACK. I checked out her personal webpage, noticed she was quite open about her religion, googled ""Rosalind Picard christian"" and found an Atlantic Monthly article that discussed at length why she was a creationist. So I added a sentence about that, making the article flow more smoothly into the signing of the petition. I also removed the second sentence explaining the petition, as I thought it was straying too off-topic.
I discussed this with Raul and can now see the merits of leaving that last sentence in - I think the article as it now stands is acceptable. What's greatly troubling to me is that instead of discussing this and working out a compromise, certain folks refused my invitation to discuss it and instantly jumped on me and started canvassing for a revert war when a few minutes of discussion would have cheerfully resolved the situation instead. (I'm personally as agnostic and anti-creationist as it gets... the only god I'm working in the name of here is WP:BLP.) This really isn't the way Wikipedia should work - assuming everyone is a POV pusher by default is not how we do things around here. ✽ " | 0.002528 | 0 | 0 |
Only white trash would call slants and hindis and moslems their equals. | 0.915571 | 1 | 0 |
Estimating the corrected sample standard deviation using Cohen's adjustment: | 0.000638 | 0 | 0 |
Thats what I think did i changed plot to story orginally. If Im wrong I might be a bit confused, Sorry for the trouble If I have caused some. Whitmore 8621 | 0.000942 | 0 | 0 |
Why did you delete my updated information on Tiens group page
Hi there,
I am new to use wikipedia. i added some information related to Tiens Group. I noticed that you deleted it. As per my knowledge, wikipedia is an open source and anyone who has been author/ knowledge about anything can add information. You deny me the rights..... Why?
I have added material again and I hope this time....... it stays. I will continue populating is with events and information. You have no clue and idea how much efforts I have put in to restore the image of TIENS in Pakistan. The information added is 100% true and can be verified from any working for Tiens in Pakistan including Tiens Management. | 0.000739 | 0 | 0 |
"
Nature
Since the article was first nominated for Core Topics COTF it has advanced in quality considerably. This is largely due to the work of . While doing so, he has contended with the continual one issue commentary (on the talk page) of . The latter seems to want to make the article into a philosophy of science article on the meanings of the term ""Nature."" As a result, I would suggest that major editorial changes to the article may not be necessary (or possible without incurring an edit war). On the other hand, the article would likely benefit from a good copyedit. However, I haven't read the article for some time to see how well it hangs together. Perhaps I should do that now. If you would also look at it in that light, we could compare notes. See you on the talk page " | 0.000533 | 0 | 0 |
Can never follow bitches who's bios look like this http://t.co/tHk9mnQtrg | 0.931072 | 1 | 1 |
contradicting my neo-Nazi anti-Serb agenda. | 0.481264 | 1 | 1 |
“@MosoKnowso: If a photographer doesn't have a back story on how he started, he did it for pussy #believethat” #CANTKNOCKTHAHUSSLE | 0.509502 | 1 | 1 |
@JennaHord12 Feels like it's been a year since I seen ya queer lolol | 0.529043 | 1 | 1 |
@BillPeriman @Po_st
I bet he would have gone ape shit and killed them all if they attacked Muslims. | 0.983109 | 1 | 1 |
@djceeloss awwww don't be a pussy ill show u was good with that turbo lol | 0.915911 | 1 | 1 |
@StudlyDubly Eat my pussy! | 0.991474 | 1 | 1 |
"* Since nobody seems interested in doing so, I have opened an RfC below. The page has already been fully protected thanks to the very quick response of an admin at WP:RPP. (✉)
" | 0.000558 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.