text
stringlengths 7
5k
| degree_of_toxicity
float64 0
1
| contains_offensive_word
int64 0
1
| label
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|
Quit changing shit you shithead. | 0.995273 | 1 | 1 |
"
List of actors who played characters that portrayed Doctor Who. Link was there all along. Discussion closed. — (talk) — " | 0.000574 | 0 | 0 |
According to this blog, it may be New Zealand v Australia, 2nd Test at Eden Park, 1976/77, with Peter Petherick on strike and Ewen Chatfield at the other end. (Talk) | 0.00064 | 0 | 0 |
Idiot
You're an idiot, I just realized that when you blocked me you said it was because I was using my IP address as a sockpuppet to avoid a block. Obviously the way I was editing pages and attacking people showed that I didn't care if I was blocked. If I left any comments on your page as anything but Emokid it's because occasionally the website will sign me off when I go to a different page, also just curious when that block ends anyway. | 0.981154 | 1 | 1 |
Ok I see, you restored my faith in the Wikipedia process, sorry for the misunderstanding. | 0.0006 | 0 | 0 |
RT @Steamed_Greens: "@JuanNdaCut: This bitch wanna be Roger from American Dad so bad http://t.co/KXhA1ZtYMs" | 0.918386 | 1 | 1 |
I will do Whatever i want and it is my right, what is both of yous Problem Asshole. | 0.978647 | 1 | 1 |
It's called common sense... I guess having a Phd. doesn't make you that smart after all... | 0.000815 | 0 | 0 |
It looks like you're actually a Russian or a Russia expert, so I'm probably going to loose this one, but well, let's hear why I'm wrong in any case -) 08:15, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC) | 0.001011 | 0 | 0 |
I'll Ignore you for now and your everyday idiotic anime likings and stop attacking you. | 0.980766 | 1 | 1 |
hey this guy is awesome, ya kill the muslims and all that, this bitch doesnt know what shes talking about, haha thats awesome, i wish i could have seen what you said | 0.994744 | 1 | 1 |
"
How does this sound?
would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact WTGDMan1986 to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so." | 0.0006 | 0 | 0 |
"Indeed it is becoming increasingly apparent that the ""mass migrations"" of the past were myths - hahaha, what an idiot you are Wobble because there is nothing claiming this or supporting this. The Bronze Age and following migrations haven't been proven/disproven you fool and there is nothing becoming increasingly apparent as to if they didnt happen. Get a life, honestly.
" | 0.917427 | 1 | 1 |
"
Derby police were aware of rumours of a paedophile gang operating in the city.[1] On 30 December 2008, Staffordshire police stopped a car on suspicion of shoplifting, carrying three gang members and three young girls.[3] The girls had been reported missing from a care home in Derby.[3] The police drove the girls back to Derby, and during the journey, they told the officers about what had been taking place.[1] Derbyshire police force launched an undercover investigation called Operation Retriever, setting up surveillance and tailing the gang's BMW around Derby.[1] Detectives collected DNA samples from several of the crime scenes.[5] Siddique was wearing an electronic tag after a previous conviction for assaulting a woman.[1]
On 24 April 2009, two distressed teenagers stumbled out of a flat that was under surveillance and said that they had been raped.[3] The police had been unaware of their presence. The victims told the police of other girls who had been assaulted, and the police soon discovered a campaign of systematic grooming and abuse within the city. Detective Inspector of Derbyshire police, Shaun Dawson, said, ""When we arrested them, we had no idea of the scale of this. Once we had them locked up other victims spoke out and it snowballed from there.""[1] Debbie Platt, who led the police investigation, said she was shocked at the extent of the abuse and said it was like ""a campaign of rape against children.""[3] The police stated that the abuse could have continued for a lot longer.[1]
I'll start with the line ""Derby police were aware of rumours of a paedophile gang operating in the city."" - which simply implies the past. I believe that there needs to be clarity of time frames - otherwise it can be taken to mean that there has always been some paedophile gang operating in the city since the dawn of time! Are there any sources which place the time frame before 30 December 2008 with any degree of certainty (Decade - year - first known event) which allow for an accurately constructed time line to be presented. A generic reference to the past is not really good enough.
TTFN " | 0.001118 | 0 | 0 |
All These hoes sooo average 😩😕 | 0.170987 | 1 | 1 |
omp
You don't have a point you christian bigot. Oh my Penelope. Otherwise you would have answered my questions. omp and I bet you didn't even look at the site. omp omp omp. We deserve as much respect as the next minority religion. I mean, come on, man. T-shirts. omp you are very stupid. And omp what's with the squiggles? They don't mean anything. They're just you being a control-freak, christian bigot. | 0.92589 | 1 | 1 |
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Arkanoid. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. (talk) | 0.000755 | 0 | 0 |
U fucken bitch wifi | 0.99776 | 1 | 1 |
"
Website
I'm sure you guys know about his website by now, georgesodini.com/20090804.htm But what I found weird is if you goto that page, and click the ""me"" link at the top, an image of him appears. If you resize that window with the image, this text is below the image: ""The south trailhead is located at the end of Lava Avenue, which has ample parking."" Does anyone know what that could mean? 216.220.23.21 " | 0.0007 | 0 | 0 |
Oh stop whining, you smelly little turd. We know that YOU are the real wikipedia serial vandal here. Oh, and you have missed about two thirds of the editing attacks on you by our team! Come on, they feel unappreciated! Add them to teh Runtshit list! And we guarantee that we will be escalating! And you should keep you eye on other non-wikipedia web sites as well.
- Rance to Gallows Now | 0.952942 | 1 | 1 |
"
Image:Nswrl_1988.jpg
I have tagged Image:Nswrl_1988.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under ""fair use"" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. " | 0.000536 | 0 | 0 |
Kiss my tookhes, stupid. | 0.994503 | 1 | 1 |
"
Baroque Guitars are NOT ""ten-string guitars""
Andrew, frankly, you are mistaken. It is incorrect to refer to a baroque guitar as a ""ten-string guitar"". No one refers to the baroque lute as ""the 24-string lute"", but correctly as the 13-course lute. This is a well-established musicological/organological convention. ""12-string guitar"" is the only exception to this, and that is only because the term has been disseminated by the popular ""cult(ure)"" in the usual brainwashed ignorance of the masses. If two strings function as one string, they are a COURSE, not two separate strings. In contrast, a ten-stringed guitar has ten separate strings each of which can be separately fretted. This is not the case on the baroque guitar, which effectively only has five courses. Moreover, the term ""ten-string"" guitar has come to signify a particular instrument, which is NOT a baroque guitar. You are evidently not a musicologist/organologist/semiologist/semantician so I don't see what you think you will achieve by being bothersome about this issue, which relates to organology and semantics." | 0.005774 | 0 | 0 |
Why don't you experiment with my balls
By sucking them | 0.997531 | 1 | 1 |
"
Berkshires,
Perhaps you say that you agree with the quoted statement, but you don't seem to get it.
Yes it is true that the Beth Din will not/didn't decide who is or should be a Rebbe to whom. They never took that power to themselves nor can I imagine that such power can even be granted. But of course they were granted the power to decide who is the ""Bobover Rebbe"", who can use the name Bobov.
Berkshires this is an obvious distinction, one that I previously thought you were faking ignorance of. I now realise that you may have very well been serious. I will therefore try to explain it in more detail.
Think for a moment, if Rabbi Halberstam should decide tommorow that he no longer wants the title Bobover Rebbe, he no longer wants he Kehilla to be named Bobov, but rather some name of some other polish town. Does that render him no longer Rebbe to his Chasidim? The connection between a Rebbe and a Chossid has absolutley nothing to do with his title.
There was a dispute in Bobov over assets, over the title, and over usage of the name Bobov and other names used by Bobov. A very simple dry Din Torah. The Beth din gave to Rabbi Halberstam side all of Bobov assets, the rights to the title, the name Bobov, and all other names used by Bobov. That does not mean that Rabbi Unger isn't a Rebbe? It doesn't even mean that he isn't a ""mamshich"" of his father-in-law or grandfather-in-law. The same way the first Bobover Ruv did not have the title Sanzer ruv but he was still a ""mamshich"" of Sanzer Ruv.
Try to remove your emotions and be impartial and you may even understand the Beth Din's logic. I am not saying you need to agree, but perhpas if you stand back for a moment you can understand their decision.
Putting aside all claims and counter claims as to who should have been selcted as the Rebbe of Bobov, I know you must believe that the son-in-law should have been selected, however there is almost unanimous consent between all Poskim that the will of the majority is respected. The Beth Din made a clear finding within the Psak that Side 2 had a majority.
If you follow that logic the Psak is self explanatory. You have a Kehilla. They made a decision as to their Rav and Rebbe. A minority is unhappy. They leave. Can they get a part of the assets? Can they use the name and title? The Beth Din answered that question with its ruling.
I went long here only because I feel a sort of denialist anger simmering within your writting, and I don't think it is warranted. I thought perhaps you can follow the logic.
In any event the Beth din did make a decsion who has and can use the title Bobover Rebbe. Rabbi Unger can no longer refer to himself as Bobover Rebbe.
It would be appropriate for you to give this a rest. " | 0.000812 | 0 | 0 |
Edit request on 6 January 2012
please consider italy among the great power.if possible consider also the top 10 most powerful countries some great powers please.
95.237.222.97 | 0.000612 | 0 | 0 |
It was Unfair that some of the senior editor of West Bengal Kolkata are not allowing latest pics to be added in Kolkata wiki page.
It's a open forum where every one has a right to speak up and post. I was recently blocked by One of the senior editor of Kolkata Wikipedia forum from posting pic's to Kolkata wiki page.
I don't know why it is that... The Kolkata wiki page is always having the same outdated pic's.
Last week on 9th May 2013... When I posted some pic's of Kolkata Economy adding IT Infrastructure pic's of Unitech Kolkata, Technopolis, DLF (IBM), Wipro . Some of the senior Kolkata wikipedians deliberately removed them giving useless excuses.
Which I think is very unfair...
So, Do I need to make my own page now adding Kolkata IT Economy???.
Really it's hectic and dominating explaining reasons to some unwanted senior editor's who always think their edit is correct and shouldn't me removed | 0.001055 | 0 | 0 |
Why do you love hate?
All I want to do is inform people what a shyamalan twist is but you must interfere with your Nazi ideology. Ich Beuge Zu Ihnen Meinen Fuhrer!
Sources
Your a dick
External Links
Stop being a dick
Thanks | 0.996934 | 1 | 1 |
wang, you are an idiot. The difference between you and my 2 year old is not only that my 2 year old is more intelligent but he is not the cowardly atheist backstabbing Communist, nor the Wikipedia Stalker that like to be, hiding behind a keyboard. I dare you to execute any plan, whatever it might include. | 0.974408 | 1 | 1 |
"
""Safeguarded"" is simply censorship by another name
The Order of the Arrow is a topic like any other. Wikipedia editors are under no obligation to adhere to the rules of any organization in terms of what information about said organization may be made public in the relevant article. Moreover, if the information is coming from a credible source, in this case the recognized texts of the organization itself, by what right do other editors refute that information's validity? In looking at the personal pages of the editors who have insisted on the exclusion of OA ""secrets"" over the life of this article it is clear that they are themselves members. Since OA members are under obligation to keep this information secret it is untenable that they should be permitted to control the editorial process of this entry and to put blocks on editors who do agree with them." | 0.000656 | 0 | 0 |
Refugee camps in Tindouf Province, Algeria| | 0.000614 | 0 | 0 |
(UTC)
This article is superbly written and strikes a perfect balance between what should be in versus what is appropriate to leave out. I very rarely reference Wikipedia as a primary source for teaching purposes but this article is exceptional. The EVM learning resources article on my Web site links to it as of May 2010. 16:24, 27 May 2010 | 0.000584 | 0 | 0 |
No, but you should be able to comment on-topic on the main points, which I have elaborated on most clearly. You have for the most part ignored my explanations, then claimed I did not consider your objections, eventually resorting to personal remarks which more than backfired on you. If you could keep to the subject matter it would be much more productive. François Robere (talk) | 0.000534 | 0 | 0 |
Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself!
Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! Go fuck yourself! | 0.997952 | 1 | 1 |
It was removed by . When I saw the edit summary, my initial thoughts were that it was probably valid. Having watched the video linked from the Flight website, it was not a low-speed clipping of winglets as is usually the case. The A380 was going a a fair speed, and it spun round the CRJ700 through about 90°. I'd suggest that the incident may be notable, but it may be worth waiting a day or so to see what else develops. I'll inform Slasher-Fun of this discussion. | 0.000718 | 0 | 0 |
@Gethenian ffffffffffffuck. Baratheon rebellions are a bitch. | 0.994545 | 1 | 1 |
"
A barnstar for you!
The Barnstar of Diplomacy You are the McDaddy of peaceful resolution, and I envy you your patience and persistence. " | 0.001442 | 0 | 0 |
@HalieMaranda @Huntermoore bitch u perfect | 0.988103 | 1 | 1 |
only like bitches ran for homecoming but like 20 running for prom | 0.889546 | 1 | 1 |
RT @OG_Steep: I dislike them weed men that bless u a couple times then begin ta tax ya , like damn pussy you tryna play a pothead | 0.969316 | 1 | 1 |
I can't entertain these hoes or these broke niggas | 0.974485 | 1 | 1 |
Image:P&P; Poster.jpg
I have tagged Image:P&P; Poster.jpg as , because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. | 0.000544 | 0 | 0 |
lame
You fuckin queer. Don't you have anything better to do than to monitor wikipedia? Go poop-stain your dick. | 0.998674 | 1 | 1 |
@_tiffanycarter bitch... Im mad at you for slapping me ✋ | 0.992143 | 1 | 1 |
Someone needs to confirm the release date that is in the article. | 0.00054 | 0 | 0 |
I agree with the criticisms above. Why is 100 million better than 104 million? 4 million is quite a sizeable amount, and more records than other artists even hope to achieve. I believe that it has sufficiently been rounded already, and it is simply inconsistent to have one figure on the Thriller page and another here. I suggest we keep 104 million. | 0.000645 | 0 | 0 |
RT @PSQ_LOADUPP: I never met a faithfull bitch | 0.955497 | 1 | 1 |
RT @eeerik23: Jimmy Graham is one ugly son of a bitch | 0.995816 | 1 | 1 |
"
Regarding this edit
Dude, you didn't have to go through all that trouble to add those pictures to WP:PUI. Those images clearly state they are copyrighted property, and are blatant copyright violations. Why didn't you speedy delete them by adding {{db-imgcopyvio}} to the page, or delete under criteria l9? - | Talk • contribs " | 0.001093 | 0 | 0 |
CambridgeBayWeather, this article is not a complete duplicate. There is accurate info on this article that does not reflect the info found in the other article. This is obvious to anyone. I am confident that you understand. | 0.000622 | 0 | 0 |
See my in my talk page. now. | 0.000753 | 0 | 0 |
When I be that pussy, I be calling you my Bitch. | 0.996944 | 1 | 1 |
RT @TrxllLegend: One good girl is worth a thousand bitches
👰 = 👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭👭… | 0.959386 | 1 | 1 |
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay UTC)
cody is gay | 0.975779 | 1 | 1 |
RT @best_seth14: Now the title bitch doesn't apply to all women, but all women have a lil bitch in em | 0.972562 | 1 | 1 |
Category:British rail transport magazines
:Category:British rail transport magazines, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. | 0.000504 | 0 | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:Pedro Téllez-Girón, 9th Duke of Osuna | 0.000659 | 0 | 0 |
I fuckedd your bitch than gave her a snack pack | 0.998115 | 1 | 1 |
“@TinnyTimm: ✊😮 u r gey af. But you're my boy I'm glad I'm close with you. You dumb bitch” how guys say "I love you" 😏 | 0.953659 | 1 | 1 |
RT @jakesiwy: @bhasfurter pussy | 0.9618 | 1 | 1 |
you might as well gone pussy pop on a stage | 0.994998 | 1 | 1 |
Shut up kid, don't tell me it's 'vandalizing' by editing an article THAT HAS proof if you look close enough and stop circle jerking it up. | 0.875384 | 1 | 1 |
"
Bar Association of San Francisco
Hi, you deleted my post for the Bar Association of San Francisco. I have permission from the author and the Bar Association to use the language from the Bar Association's website under GFDL in the post. Should I get a confirmation e-mail from the author to you directly or should I give you the e-mail address of the author to get that confirmation? I'm still learning the ways of wikipedia, didn't realize I needed to have a confirmation e-mail sent directly before posting! Also I would appreciate it if you could send me the deleted post or repost it because I do not have an archived copy with all of the external news links I put in to show its notoriety. Thanks!
Apologies for the delay in replying, I only just noticed your post. Essentially, there are a number of problems with the article besides the copyright infringement. The article had a promotional tone and feel, largely as a result of copying the material form the association's website. With WP articles we try to maintain a neutral point of view so it may be a better idea to write the content in your own words. The article alo didn't cite reliable sources for much of its content in order to help support the claim that the association is notable. What I'd encourage you to do is rewrite the article, in your own words, using the information from the various sources to guide you and having very little dependency on the association's own website. If you feel you still need the deleted material for this please let me know and I'll strip out the references and provide them to you. If there's anything else you feel you need, or if youb have any questions, please let me know. Many thanks, moff
Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice
Hi,
As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.
We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.
You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.
We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!
Thanks
I just saw the history of my userpage, and thanks for reverting that. I have no idea who that was. Anyway, I guess I have my own stalker. Fan
has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.
== The [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Video gam | 0.00066 | 0 | 0 |
I'm known around Tampa as the ugly kid with no hoes | 0.354177 | 1 | 1 |
@TheRealSaigon that explains you cause all you do is bitch and whine. | 0.987962 | 1 | 1 |
"
Let me first of all set the record straight about the history of the relationship between myself and User:Jza84. On his talk page Jza84 states 'I hardly know the editor bar an passing in a discussion from time to time'. As Mangojuice notes on that same page, 'Jza clearly knows Enaidmawr is a long-time established editor here; Jza interacted with Enaidmawr as early as November 2007, over 6 months before Jza became an admin.' That interaction was courteous and constructive and repeated on a number of occasions. I wouldn't claim that we were regular collaborators, but collaborate we did, and if somebody had aske me, before this incident, 'do you know this editor and do you have a good working relationship with him?' I would have replied in the affirmative, without hesitation. The only real ""edit conflict"" I had with him prior to this was in February of this year, at British Day. This was resolved civilly and without rancour, although I have to admit that I found his attitude at the time patronising - ""A lesson would be it took all of five minutes to strengthen the article up with a few references."" - and felt that the zealousy with which he reacted to my edits - an effort to bring balance to a biased account, in my opinion, for what it's worth - whilst ignoring a number of dubious and unsourced statements and peacock terms for the opposing view of the subject, was unbalanced. However, I refrained from comment (see Brit Day in his talk page archive). 'Everybody is entitled to their views', I said to myself, and moved on. I'll admit that I tended to avoid him after that as I had no wish to get embroiled in anything: I've got better things to do. I could have responded to this comment on Talk:Newport which I found to be deeply insulting to all Welsh people: saying that Daicaregos was 'an advocate of ""Welsh nationality"" (which doesn't exist, verifiabily)(). That statement left me with the indelible impression that Jza84 denied the nationality of myself and all Welsh people. I thought that was a very hurtful comment and completely unnecessary and I am sure that most Welsh people would feel the same way. However, once again I did not respond even though I was part of that discussion and was sorely tempted to do so: 'Ignore it', I told myself. Shortly later I became aware of a series of edits by Jza84 removing Welsh nationality and replacing it with 'British' on a number of articles on my watchlist; amongst them was the article on Dafydd Wigley, Plaid Cymru's senior statesman. Rightly or wrongly, I was by then convinced that Jza84 had a personal agenda on this matter. I reverted some edits and ignored others not on my watchlist as I genuinely did not want to get involved in a dispute (and no, it had nothing to do with his admin status). However, when I saw his edit to Template:Welsh kingdoms, also on my watchlist, I will admit that I was incensed. I reacted with less tact than I should have done, I admit. I reverted his edit. Changing 'Welsh kingdoms' to the woefully incorrect and insulting 'Brittonic petty kingdoms of Wales' seemed to me to confirm my impression of him: it basically de-Cymricised the major kingdoms of medieval Wales, which have a central place in our history and identity, used a term which is both incorrect and open to misinterpretation by the general reader (not everyone is aware of the meaning of the rather obsolete and affected term 'petty kingdom'). He than undid my edit and came up with the wording 'Ancient kingdoms of Wales', which is again quite simply incorrect ('medieval' is not 'ancient'). Then I read his ""explanation"" on the talk page. Quite frankly I thought he was taking the mickey. It also confirmed me in my opinion that he had an agenda of denying the Welsh people their identity (quote: 'What exactly are the Welsh kingdoms? Kingdoms inhabited by the Welsh? Well, no, the Welsh are a modern nation who live in Wales. Are they subdivisions of Wales? Well, also no, these kingdoms pre-date Wales by centuries (Wales was a concept of the future!'). 'What fools historians, Welsh and others, have been to refer to such icons of Welsh history as Llywelyn the Great as Welsh (and his court poets who praised him as 'King of the Welsh' etc.)', I said to myself. At that point I should have taken a deep breath and walked away to make a coffee, count to several thousand and then respond. But I did not, and the result is this. That sets the record straight. I've already apologised for any offense I may have caused and given my opinion of Jza84's decision. I write this to let my peers who have commented and acted on the matter get the 'history' behind this incident from my point of view. I do not intend to respond here to other things which have been said or implied here and at Jza8 | 0.000641 | 0 | 0 |
Oppose: It was a launch item so it should be their
Elven6 | 0.001071 | 0 | 0 |
With respect, there is no action that can be taken here via the adminhelp template. If you are looking for a block review you should reuse the unblock template. If you wish to engage in legal discussion or take legal action against the WMF, you should contact the WMF directly, as you say you have already done. Your request for adminhelp largely rehashes the material from the previous ANI thread, and is unlikely to generate a response that is of assistance to you. | 0.000586 | 0 | 0 |
"
Stuart is David Stuart (Michigan politician), I presume. It looks like you may have overlooked Battle of Milliken's Bend. I don't have a particular interest in the subject, but you need to be careful of the controversy surrounding blacks in the Confederate Army. There is a current trend on the Internet to try to convince people that there were nontrivial numbers who actually fought in uniform (rather than slave laborers, cooks, Teamsters, etc.), but this theory is roundly denounced by virtually all credible Civil War historians. Gary Gallagher, for instance, has stated ""If there were blacks serving as soldiers in the Confederate Army, Robert E. Lee would certainly have wanted to know about it."" " | 0.00077 | 0 | 0 |
Achievement - YOU ARE A BlTCH
Get off my talkpage you gay arse. | 0.992359 | 1 | 1 |
Well what do you suggest, use the flag of the former government or the incoming assembly? | 0.000659 | 0 | 0 |
"Concerning the Article: ""Hinayana Buddhism From Wikipedia"" as a note: In Thailand, where the National Religion is Theravada Buddhism, the National Museum, in its display concerning the history of the Kingdom of Thailand (specifically the Sukkhothai and Ayutthaya periods), makes a very clear distinction between Theravada and Hinayana Buddhism listing it as a seperate religion (along with Mahayana Buddhism and Christianity)that was at times under the patronage of the King. It would appear that the Thai Hierarchy of Buddhism has no confusion concerning the use of this term." | 0.000544 | 0 | 0 |
@djfeds bitch just meet me up here lol | 0.987274 | 1 | 1 |
I bet that nigga @gucci1017 got charged for murder for tha intro of "Gucci vs Guwop" cause straight killed that hoe! #FreeGucci #FreeRadric | 0.924757 | 1 | 1 |
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. (t|p|c) | 0.000653 | 0 | 0 |
Redirect
Seriously, though, this is supposed to be an article about the school, I expected this article to contain information about the school itself and about the time when President Bush visited it during the 9/11 attacks. So, if a school is somehow related to 9/11 it's rendered worth less (or even worthless) for its own article? | 0.00061 | 0 | 0 |
Cla68, you are well respected member, Probably impossible to understand by anyone, who lied to you so that you protect
a misogynist RooshV who was named the most hated man in the world,
part of extremist and hate group, who is on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s extremism report, a privilege usually reserved for neo-Nazis and terrorists
Maybe you should read more about him, before editing his page and removing important
information about him.
Do you realize the effect that it has on your reputation, to support an extremist, mysoginist, have you even read his hateful works
and the interviews for Washtington Times or Daily Dot magazines and what RooshV constantly promotes? Have you read his books and his articles
and what Roosh constantly promotes? Do you realize the effect on your reputation to associate yourself with RooshV ? | 0.028664 | 0 | 0 |
@REM_2014 @FunnyPicsDepot @DavetheBrave1 bitch ass voices in his head haha | 0.978997 | 1 | 1 |
Delete
DELETE THE FUCKING IMAGES AND STOP SENDING ME THIS MESSAGES! | 0.995254 | 1 | 1 |
I'm on vacation at the shore ... all was calm when I went to dinner ... and then, well, you see the result. I'll probably be at dinner when something goes down with Hamels. For right now, I'm going to play back the Blue Jay game and see how they won tonight. | 0.0008 | 0 | 0 |
ouch
bad move mother fucker. i'm coming for you now. why do you have to protect your boy friend. why can't he let the people see what is really thought about him instead of deleting it and hiding like a pussy, making you talk for him. it is truly adorable, but after it was reported it certainly won't happen again (from your side)
you are one little pussy! | 0.997421 | 1 | 1 |
Done Landes (department)|Landes]]. | 0.000915 | 0 | 0 |
@ShawnHarvey0 I'm finna get my leg dne & my hands catch up hoe | 0.423209 | 1 | 1 |
Still wit the Same bitches to the death of me😩 | 0.973259 | 1 | 1 |
"
And considering that the population of San Roque is similar to that of Gibraltar, it is quite funny that you deem it a ""small insignificant town"" which does not merit an entry in wikipedia. " | 0.000616 | 0 | 0 |
RT @CurrenSy_Spitta: And if a bitch can't respect a nigga wit some paper and a fresh pair of bball shorts then she was raised terribly.. | 0.94573 | 1 | 1 |
cellpahi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi moron hi morondding | 0.974229 | 1 | 1 |
fuck off with you hypocritical moralistic talk. I ve put down some sourceable evidence and you ve not once replied to these per se, so fuck off and throw that garbage elsewhere. | 0.997977 | 1 | 1 |
"
""pro-Japan anti-Korea/China bias""? Why just because I want all articles in a game series to match? If you read this - Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-12-21_Street_Fighter_character_articles - you'll see why I've moved the articles. And it's nothing to do with Japan or Korea. " | 0.000679 | 0 | 0 |
"
Removal of ""tags""
I will remove the ""tags"" because:
""Clean up"" - Neither I nor (until now) anybody else (also not the user that put in the tags) has had any idee what kind of ""Clean up"" is required!
""Lead section"" - There is and has always been a ""lead section"" what also is recognized by the automatic software function!
" | 0.000849 | 0 | 0 |
Sound like the kind of malice and stupidity I expect from you | 0.947021 | 1 | 1 |
Heyo! Obese boy if u can make it to 2009 (that heart struggling amongst all the girth) I'd say there is a such thing as magic. Enjoy this > . Thinking about creating you a nice my space with your picture. Before will be yours, after will be the pic of the walrus
By the way, I WONDER WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF U POURED SOME BARBECUE SAUCE ON CKATZ. WOULD U GUYS STILL BE FRIENDS. DOUBTLESSLY HE'D be seeing the inside of your digestive system 143.235.209.240 | 0.645035 | 1 | 1 |
(UTC)
This reference shows that the first black inter collegiate fraternity is Alpha Kappa Nu.
http://media.www.msuspokesman.com/media/storage/paper270/news/2006/02/10/CampusLife/Tribute.A.Brief.History.Of.Black.Collegiate.Fraternities.And.Sororities-1614202.shtml?sourcedomain=www.msuspokesman.com&MIIHost;=media.collegepublisher.com
00:21, 19 September 2006 | 0.001023 | 0 | 0 |
WHY DON/T YOU JUST GO FUCK YOURSELF ASSHOLE! | 0.997481 | 1 | 1 |
It would appear that only privileged people can discuss the issues surrounding this article's bias and only very privileged people can actually edit the article. How is this fairness? 72.205.37.144 | 0.000674 | 0 | 0 |
I think the tag should be jusified. The reason you brought is good and so I removed the sentence. Nepaheshgar | 0.000654 | 0 | 0 |
"
No. You are quite blatantly the troll here, and the others who have pointed this out, including user:Egg Centric, are right. As I mentioned before, there is no place on wikipedia for ""TheIrishWarden"". You may have fooled some of us, but you won't get away with this for long! 94.2.68.11 " | 0.585028 | 1 | 1 |
I've cleaned up the image tag as fair use, so it should be OK. | 0.000542 | 0 | 0 |
Wicked Person.... Wicked Demon that is in you. I rebuke you in the name of YEHOVAH God the Name of YESHUWA HAMASHIACH the Son and the Holy Breath..... | 0.935153 | 1 | 1 |
"
Welcome
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Kalanilyam Drama Vision, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the ""sandbox"" rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of User talk:Lukep913my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! (Talk) " | 0.000586 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.