input
stringlengths 776
1.77k
| output
sequencelengths 1
1
| id
stringlengths 41
41
|
|---|---|---|
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Actually, old laws need to be enforced.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-2d55c6e61ff04b2d8fb93004929f846c |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Bob Weinstein-You certainly can turn a phrase to get the point across. Yup, what's wrong with stomping on everyone else and ignoring the real issue. Like it or not Alaska has been getting gouged. Ya, oil production has been a good thing, but big oil wants as much of what they spent back and we can't pay that bill. However, with the help of Meyers, Micchicic and guys like Huggins who once said: We work for the oil companies they probably will get their wish! Remember those guys work for oil and Huggie Bear is a retired Army "Kernal." They are leaving for warmer climates anyway when they are done wrecking this place. Johnathan, Andy and Ivy keep the pressure on!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-97c588d5a29e4348ad8840cf379f60a8 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Well said!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-7977a3d38150476ab9a88eff4c29a2ce |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: "Anybody who can kiss that many asses, that quickly, is so primed for success in the American workplace that they don't need your crappy restaurant job."
^This.
Also, having been both the chatty person and the languishing-in-line-behind-the-chatty-person person, I think the best thing to do is smile and get over it.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-56c4b6b6a1e2427ead64a6fc57551b8f |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Gee, maybe you should have written a letter to Senator Mike Dunleavy since he obviously didn't "get it" during his four hour guided tour with you last year. He probably was more concerned with transgenders using the woods for human waste along with women and children.
I find it curious that someone can worry about who might be in a public restroom with children (I think the parent should be with them) and yet not have the least worry about guns not having child safety devices on them.
As for the unregulated and unsafe shootings in the area you have given up any form of protection under the Second Amendment, which we all know was the Second Commandment Moses received from God.
"Thou shall not restrict guns or concealed carry."
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-651d3edfb4994e088f7baba5940872db |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I was thinking the same thing. Everything about this guy seems like he was the real life basis for Ruckus.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-4c284c6a3c46492f8262e379db493cf0 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The state is paying a huge sum for Furie to drill down deep into formations thought to hold large pockets of gas and oil that the previous drillers never bothered to drill to because they had access to smaller pockets already producing. The "renaissance" was to get them to drill to that "deep" zone. It wasn`t classified or secret if it`s the same deal I`m thinking about. You`ll notice the companies never discuss the depths they are referring to?... there`s a reason for that. When they hit the pocket it then becomes confidential information between the DNR and the drilling company. But we do know what the "intended" depth was that the state contracted with Furie to go to, before it reported the find. I would think the depth is confidential from the public unless I`m mistaken. Large credits and subsidies should end now that Conoco/Agrium have enough gas, demonstrating there is no longer a need for Alaska to suffer fiscally as there is no shortage of gas anymore.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-c44374fbace649248080b9b9fc68bd11 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: This goes way beyond Alaskan politics. A good economist and political advisor could have seen the plummet in oil prices due to impending world events.
Alaska wouldn't be the first state or country to entice others to come for the resources and share in the wealth. The problem is, if Alaska didn't modify its taxation structure with big oil, the jobs you all are talking about that might be leaving, would already be gone. Something to consider. States cannot force big companies to take the risk if there isn't a big reward. Like others, perhaps we need to look to consumerism, diversification and incremental changes as our solution instead of relying on the oil money chasm.
The price of oil will return - then what will the rewards become, and for how long?
If anything this was a good kick in the left and right butt cheeks of the same congressional unit, looking toward the future of Alaska.
But this us vs. them bipartisan crap will only alienate each other, and dangerously so.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-0e82083e6b9b4929abe4d97b73ade88a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I feel like no one is talking about the real story here: Wesley Crusher and the Travler went through Time and Space for a while. Who is to say Wesley didn't populate the Humans in the Star Wars galaxy. I mean, you’re far from home and lonely and you want to get your freak on. Who could blame him. Wesley Crusher, the cause of all ills across multiple galaxies.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-27a5fa352bfa493e9661020c9a723501 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I have friends who are retired and do "Grancare" for their four grandchildren. I love the daily photos they share. Because of my medical issues I can't babysit full time for my own grandchildren but I help out whenever I can. I love babysitting my grandkids and feel very fortunate that four of my seven live in our hometown. When I was a young parent 40 years ago daycare was extremely hard to find. I had never thought about it because I was raised in a culture where the grandparents and extended family provided care. It was extremely hard to try to work and find safe, healthy day care providers. My grandmother finally came up to live with us so she could us. When she left I found a new program called a day care center and was able to utilize it until my kids started school. It was through a church other wise I couldn't have afforded it. I wish I could have stayed home with my kids but we couldn't afford it.Glad I can be here for my grandkids!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-b929ce6265f142dab962bd70fa09d9b9 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: In Part I the author says, "While I’ve stopped eating meat and gone off the grid in an effort to reduce carbon emissions, I can’t give up my Toyota Tacoma. And, apparently, I’m not alone."
It won't be easy. Like quitting tobacco... Or, having a living room without cable tv... Or, a farm without slaves... Society/economy/culture can change. Humans did alright before everyone owned a motorized vehicle.
Do we want the future with hours every day spent inside the car? Or the one where Hawaii leads the world towards a happier healthier existence?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-bfc3deca2ab848aba54fcf938c085f81 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Oh please.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-5a8368b7bc6b4cd69e9eada65c7ddbe4 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: We used to hang rapists. That bothered the lefties because of demographic issues. But I'm all in favor of hanging. Society needs to make it clear that we won't tolerate it.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-0c920b491ccf418a89e9039591e06c38 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Watch out! These same "knowledgeable" planners decided years ago to kill off all the pike in the Kelly Lake area (near Willow), only to eradicate all the fish in the lake. Guess what! No pike were in the lake at all. Now they refuse to re-stock the lake.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-ffaf8ac5a1b745e2bcf8afa24c98590e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I have learned a lot from this
Everybody suddenly is an expert on where lot lines are, whereas the day before they were not
Everybody must have been there because we have several thousand first hand accounts with expert dog behavior testimony
Everybody"s dog is perfect and never known to be aggressive even though police reports show otherwise
The shooter should receive death threats on facebook from internet tough guys who would never confront anybody in person
Obviously the shooter parked" in the dog owners yard" when was the last time somebody drove up in front of your house and pulled up on the grass?apparently these psychic witnesses saw all this
Labs are never aggressive!! Guess what clueless dog owners. Dogs behave incredibly different absent owners. Get over it.
All these silly comments convince me you dog experts are anything but that
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-fbed97e693834019b7edacdf042b752d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: What are the real issues in this case? There is no background here, just discussion of money. What legal principles are at stake here. Impossible to make a determination without any information. Perhaps the AG can write his own article so we can at least understand this case.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-a85d13258bad4d6694e4273028b5e38b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Right. Not talking about what happened decades ago, although I'll wager I know considerably more about that than you do, I'm talking about what's going on right now. And the only 'lumping' I did was between you and your comments, which provide further proof you don't have a clue concerning this particular issue. You call me a 'racist' and you don't even know what 'race' I am.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-e454c5f69f0b4e78a8b8f36ad154d7c7 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: If she is bisexual but married only to a man, the state is discriminating against her for not also letting her marry a woman. It's all about love and who are we to deprive bisexuals of a marriage to a member of each sex?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-3af5945ee1794a39a6e4d523dfd31eda |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I just noticed that jimminnery.com is available for only $12. I think I'll buy it and use it as a comprehensive abortion resource website to help inform confused teens about the complete array of options available to them through Planned Parenthood and other sex education and health services providers. Oh, sweet irony.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-98fb8be2878b42ec9e3ef56f5a9e135e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Good report. ""While troopers were talking with him, the male charged at troopers with a knife in his hand," troopers wrote. "Two troopers fired their service weapons while one trooper attempted to utilize a Taser."" They couldn't have tapered him? He needed to be nearly killed?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-2b0894a37d9e445ebb1afb59003a3be3 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The three former judges are mediators. Caldwell's latest appointee, now awaiting Council confirmation, Peter Adler is also a mediator. The Commission needs diversity, both in professional background and age. The commissioners, including designee Adler, are in their 60s and 70s. That appointment should be held in Council until after the August primary election. If Caldwell loses, his successor should make the appointment. Although this would leave the commission short a member for many more months, there are many commission vacancies the mayor has not filled. The key message in this article is that the mayor wants to destroy the Ethics Commission. The voters and Council should make sure he doesn't.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-7dfbeeedd4c24906a7ba21ca3a1789f9 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: "It is already Federal law not to have a weapon within 600 feet of a school or a day care center"
.
Nope.
(Though you're right about the ridiculousness of the patchwork, it only applies if the person KNOWS there's a school too close to where s/he is.)
.
First off, it's 1000' (apx. 3 blocks), including on the property & in the buildings, though there are exceptions... including having a CCL from the state in which the school sits.
.
Secondly, that federal "gun-free" school zone law only applies to grades 1-12, not day care centers, not kindergartens, not colleges.
.
For the actual federal law giving the definitions, see 18USC921 (25) and (26) here:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/921
.
For the federal "gun-free" school zone law itself, see 18USC922(q)(2):
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/922
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-68f4837371da4bd69ae729afe90bbcbb |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: as a moderate democrat the last thing we need is another liberal wiping their buttocks with the constitution sitting on the Supreme Court. if the roll were reversed the democrats would be waiting till after the election.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-33a9fe7d15d5474eb12550d455ae9469 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: You're not paying attention. It's obvious by your drivel that you have no idea how the state budget works and is funded. The only thing the Democrats are obstructing is paying for 3/4 of budget with savings at the peril of future PFD's. That's completely obvious and transparent. Your frequent biased (not to mention overtly prejudice) rants are ridiculous and entirely outside the relm reality. By your engament on this forum it's obvious you read and write - but the comprehension has me worried. I'd recommend slowing down and really concentrating on the material. This letter from from Cpt Conoco should be classified as a work of fiction....just a heads up.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-b63bfcdbd5a449268e8795cb82e17e37 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The termination of a public employee is a "personnel" matter, not a "personal" matter. Such incidents are not open to the public unless the person terminated wishes to have his/her personnel materials partially or fully disclosed. So the "we can't talk about it" answer, while frustrating, is correct. If the incident "played out" as this article describes, I, for one, see no justification for Mr. Roberts' termination. Other reasons? You will NOT hear them unless, like Principal Lange in Springfield, Mr. Roberts chooses to have the information made public.
I know nothing of those possible "other reasons." I do know that, to my knowledge, Mr. Roberts has been a competent, trustworthy public employee. He's "crossed swords" with the Board of Directors of , at least, oneother entity and been, essentially, terminated because of it. That doesn't mean he was "wrong" then, and it doesn't mean he's "wrong" now. The third-party investigation he suggested seems a good idea.......
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-f7eab01b013742d7bdbbefca20416fb0 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I was shocked to see this change in the official results! I can't believe that there was ever 88 Clinton supporters outside when the counting was taking place. I'm looking at the photos I took throughout the process and I don't see that many people. They told us the count was 352 to 69. This seems really shady...
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-6b3b7e1ecbc44fd1a41835fca1051300 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: You are SO right, children DO pick up on these things so easily. That's why so many men think it's OK to sexually assault women or take advantage of them. Because Snow White and Sleeping Beauty BOTH portrayed men who kissed women while they were completely unconscious and without their permission. Also, we can't forget that our sons are absolutely influenced to kill one another, since they witnessed it on The Lion King. It's funny though, in the same post you cherry picked that kids don't pick up on certain things in movies, but then went on to imply kids will "pick up" on a relationship in a movie. Your logic is just spot on!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-710b064088aa49efbe878533aabafae9 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Not a dollar for the Port, which at least a majority of the population depends on for food and other commodities, but funding for a project that gradually eliminated the design features that might have preserved the uses that attract people to Anchorage. It is the same old push to run Bragaw through the University area that has been around for decades. It took boards handpicked by Sullivan to get it through the local process. This funding is the kind of thing that used to happen just before the budget went to the printer the night before the vote. A slight improvement over that process I guess, but still unacceptable as public testimony was deemed unnecessary.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-5ecd05e39ce646da90b0b45e0ae0996e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I'll bet that Cat would say that in person. The appropriate response is to flag and move on or ignore the post. I find Cat to be one of the most humorous posters on here.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-329716d49c2d44b5ac6b1e4b07ab95b9 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: So, so sick! Its amazing how heartless some people can be. Trophy hunting and animal trapping are all sick acts of cruelty that must be stopped. Now an entire family of wolves are gone! More should have been done to prevent this happening. There is nowhere safe for wild animals anymore...
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-3844d211ecfa4fe9a7543ebb484194ce |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: That means you'd lose your welfare checks, Dial.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-f765ead366bb4f06aa3e9d52bd5842dd |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I don't care what sex you are; I don't feel (and didn't in high school, either) comfortable dressing and undressing in front of others. Perhaps the schools now need to find it in their budgets to build facilities that are more private. (Ack!) One of the reasons I enjoyed taking riflery in high school was because I didn't have to dress out and still got my gym credit. I'm just extremely shy about such things; I don't think I'm alone that way, either.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-faa85e04d74a47c0918cc97f804f406b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I agree with you that residents are very kept busy...MUPTES, City Hall, Kesey Square, Re-striping of many of our streets so that no longer flow, etc. I have lived in Eugene
for many years and have never seen anything like this before or in any town or city
have ever lived in.
The current Eugene Weekly cover and other major articles in the RG and The Weekly continue to discuss these issues as well as the transparency issue.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-bb9dc7078af6418c820369b05561068a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: It's amazes me that so much bad is said about Trump without taking time to consider it isn't racist to want people to come to America legally. I don't know what's so difficult to understand that they're breaking the law and no other country on the planet would allow it. He doesn't hate people, neither do his supporters, but it's wrong to allow whoever wants to come here to do so without doing it by legal means. We're a nation of immigrants and they are welcome here.
Wish the ladies would stop acting like Trump is going to take away their right to abortion, it is the law of the land and Trump has said that several times. He doesn't want to get in our personal business between our doctors and us. Likewise he has hired numerous women of all colors, if you're qualified for the position he'd be stupid not to. He's not out to get you, he's pointing out the ones who are using you though.
I'm tired of few jobs in Oregon, tired of unemployment and scraping by, he'll bring jobs home.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-5648a853c8d34522887c71d75a16d89f |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Maybe read the stuff you share because there isn't anything even remotely Nazi like about his quotes. Where are the exhortations to extermination? Or the calls for white supremacy? Sorry you've got nothing, now please stop indulging your emotional bias and actually look at the issues. When you do that it becomes crystal clear that Trump is miles away the better candidate.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-8beb76ededf4469fb12b7874117377ee |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Nothing really new. They've picked up NK rocket parts in this state in the past.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-040bd8cd9ae5432d97cdeb15307b27e4 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: yeah because all those jobs can be filled with qualifying Alaskan residents who want to work in the oil field, right?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-87814595e1a4414d98c772339ae53743 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Planting trees sounds much more pleasant than cleaning up the trash and bodily waste left behind.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-00d73ee729c34771b4bb43037dae9fa8 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: You guys can slap each other on the back until the cows come home. It doesn't make what you do for a living honorable.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-c61394c11a2549e9a70099dfb0631588 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Perpetuating lies
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-df0d5c7781354d6cbe164f76e66ba872 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Jack Phillips of Masterpiece Cake was clear -- he would bake birthday cakes, cookies, whatever else for ANYONE, but he would not participate in sexual immorality by baking a same-sex wedding cake. Why is it that you folks seem unable to see the distinction here?
A birthday cake or a batch of cookies is not the same as a commitment to a lifestyle of sin ... which is what a same-sex wedding cake symbolizes. As long as gays leave me out of their practice of sin, I am not entitled to discriminate. But when they ask/demand that I participate ... then I have a right to an opinion and the religious obligation to say "no".
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-efafae9bb0e147128c2644d130ed211f |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: the shills/lobbyists are the predators robbing the people. The elected are rubes, the treasury is stolen by shills getting the 100,000 dollar jobs as 'aides' to elected, party hegemon and lobbyists that submit prewritten bills. We are looking under the wrong rocks for worms. These audacious commenters are their assault force on our beach
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-767941a9ed5c436ca38c56f0d480464e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I say good riddance maybe then all those who are system suckers will pack up and take their crime with them.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-21235c2414b8425d8b0759749d38c39b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I think people are finding that when they move without contacts to a new area...the great
paying jobs just aren't there as hoped for...especially in a University town when so many
have degrees and advanced degrees. I have met several grads and those with even advanced degrees who are working at the grocery stores and are grateful to have a steady job.
That is just the economics of our country right now.
Also, new folks who move here during the summer may not be able to handle the many
months of grey weather and rain.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-c67dd91e3cb84b31a9803d27827e58fe |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Daniel Donkel lives in Florida, our state is his cash cow. No thanks Daniel.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-08257f0fc9a946d8ac473dbc244d3604 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: "Elections are seen as important to legitimizing regimes," he said, but instead of imposing one-party rule, as in the past, today's authoritarians "use a variety of devices to control and/or manipulate the media, intimidate opponents" and so on."
Like this article by repeating some quotes such as:
"President Enrique Peña Nieto of Mexico criticized Trump's plans to build a wall on the border and to bar Muslims from entering the United States. "That's the way Mussolini arrived and the way Hitler arrived," he said. The actor George Clooney called Trump "a xenophobic fascist." Louis C.K., the comic, said, "The guy is Hitler." Eva Schloss, the 87-year-old stepsister of Anne Frank, said Trump "is acting like another Hitler by inciting racism."
The media is always trying to shape the way or what we think that is why people need to do their own research to find out the facts. The facts often do not support what you think or believe to be true and if you are open to it change your perception.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-9522534172684723a3f853e59447703b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Oh, now you're a lame sexual predator too, Chance? Me thinks you're dreaming. Wake up, Chance.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-0720ddc8078144478a22132fc5806c8a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: If you read her comment without reading your own prejudice into the comment you would understand what she's saying is true.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-9fd1fba4ec5344f8a1101df545d8c4e6 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Responding to people without the testicles to use their names is like responding to bathroom graffiti.. Think maybe I 'll pass up the temptations to skewer you for a while "ItsMe" - and my same sentiment is heartily forwarded to you too, Obomba..
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-6b2efe96dc014b6b825a7e2778c54ec1 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The second sexual ASSAULT should be life in prison, death sentence, or castration.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-83d37fee18c04bc5bd729ef25eae938d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The jackasses at Anchorage Daily News have cooked up a new censorship scheme for their comments sections...you now have to rate other people's comments as 'civil' or 'not civil.' The idea is that they won't have to waste their time censoring you, they'll get everyone else to do it for them. For you to post, you have to rate other people's comments. For your post to get through, they have to rate yours.
HOW FUCKING NAZI IS THIS?!!
They're too lazy to censor you themselves. But they have to make sure YOU get censored, so they dump that job on other commenters.
FUCK YOU ADN.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-6fada4c7e21c43b6b19ba850c595d975 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Who let the Dogs, errr, Trolls out?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-acafa83863c046b1908dad30036a63d0 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: does this mean that replies will not be "peer-reviewed"? Or does it mean those peer reviews just won't drop a reply "down the page" if the parent-level comment doesn't drop. ah, below I just saw the answer from aja b. , direct replies, indeed, will not be sorted....however, I presume they will still be subject to "civility" review.. thanks and thanks to aja b
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-ee20aa747dfa406ca8ad14ef22c98d66 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: maybe time to think of impeaching him, hes too arrogant and wont listen to anyone
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-070537d90025402cb79380daa61da937 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: My partner works at REI and says there are tents stolen on a daily basis, with a grab and run technique. I ride the Springwater Corridor and it's pretty obvious that some of those tents along with the bicycles, gas barbeque grills and market umbrellas are straight out of people's yards. Great that there are donations from various people and groups, but let's get real, your missing stuff is not a 'donation.'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-c5d9782f3fe14e849ed6b0a45d8b569f |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Go Donald!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-1f9e9bd62ea544418a2842650b754bce |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: "God himself will punish those involved in homosexuality," he said. "This, is not for the servants" of God. <- root of the problem. What an ugly, hateful sentiment.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-5164391c3b8a422182730daf7dff3d8e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The problem is, the Internet can so quickly and efficiently spread *mis*information, too ...
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-358893d5a47e42d98fcc3205e7797d14 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: And 10 years, in a Federal Prison.
A. Subsistance Hunting. In 1987 the International Whaling Commission (IWC) set a quota of 3...but only one was killed in 1987...since the men are now aged or dead.
http://www.fws.gov/ecos/ajax/docs/recovery_plan/whale_humpback.pdf
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-7ada322ea37845cd9aee3cc014419b7f |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Thank you for writing this piece and putting out the facts in context. Much appreciated. While the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge is the current "thorn in our paw" over public lands my hope is that folks understand that it is just a small, but painful element of a much larger plan to wrest away our public lands to allow exploitation. That it is being done with lies about our US Constitution and our Founding Fathers is appalling and should anger all of us. If the militias and protesters are so anxious to deal with "tyrants" and those destroying the promise of America they have only to look at the forces bent on stealing our lands for exploitation and buying our political system. Thanks again for arguing for lawfulness and reminding citizens that our public lands legacy is on the line.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-767b0c34cd2749d4ba1565ccb3f9d43a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: With all due respect, this is nothing new. A judge who makes decisions about families, who can't come out of his self-imposed closet, is too full of drama in his own life to make balanced decisions. If he is using his sexual preferences to garner sympathy, today is perfect. However, it is not earth-shattering news to find out our society has bigots and racists. One has to understand that jumping on the victimhood wagon nowadays is looked at as more whining, because nobody is offering up anything to bring people together....just crying about being mistreated. Life is hard, and then we die.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-ae18f3afbd8c46baa41bee4409a69cd8 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Yes, the Gop is really good at vetting vice presidential candidates. Romney chose a guy whose claim to fame was having been the driver of the Oscar Meyer Wiener Wagon. McCann choose Palin and thus assured his own defeat. Then the was Dick Cheney who shot his hunting buddy, Dan Quayle who had spelling issues and Spiro Agnew who was thrown out of office along with his boss. I'm sure it will be different this time, not.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-1618cb0dc9384fd7aa15fcd0bda72efc |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: We can cut another billion, which only leaves $2 billion deficit. The CBR is $12-15 billion? That is six or seven years at which time the oil market will have recovered... The lack of capital investment now insures shortages therefore higher prices some time in future. I feel very comfortable with $80 a barrel five years from now.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-557a7815bca6415bab2737c8399d57a2 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I repeat, an action does not have to be a crime in order to result in disciplinary action by a College or University....again, may I cite the example of cheating on a final examination. It's no crime, but it's nearly guaranteed to get you heavily disciplined; likely expelled. Secondly, the article makes it clear that the standard of "preponderance of evidence" is appropriate rather than "beyond a reasonable doubt" in actions which do involve potentially criminal penalties. Austin, Artis and Dotson are good examples of this concept. Certainly, schools are (now) required to report to the police cases of alleged rape. However, through Title IX, they are also REQUIRED to launch their own investigation of the incident. This whole process is extremely problematic, especially since nearly all of these cases involve "date" or "acquaintance" rape or sexual assualt and the defense is a claim that the act was "consensual", resulting in a "he says, she says" situation......
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-264b3e517a914addbb13d25a22b24e8b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Drunken sailors stop spending when they run out of money.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-1c01b740f05a469ba96eefae9f74750d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: "Reality" is people watching TV rather than Washington, which seems to think gridlock is interesting to folks. Partisan & politically correct "gotcha" media have only themselves to blame for Trump - as he takes the opportunity to make what seems like a pejorative ideological hand gesture at the Media & its assumption that they can choose the candidates by selecthighlighting controversial excerpts or by PR assassination. Some of the bluntness amongst these professional liars is LONG overdue. Shows a large ignorance of the tolerance of America, previously thought to be under Media's PC control. Early in 2015, they called Trump a joke. Then they said he'd be gone in 2 months. Then, uh, surely gone by August as serious candidates like Jeb got going. Then the "polls would correct" by October, and then, in December when Cruz surged, everyone knew it'd be over for him. Then he began winning the... vote (!) and with the GOP's "early winner" primary strategy, its now panic time. Wake up folks.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-f45f206e927c40f09a08c5f982beee11 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: "Not in lieu of termination." However, it was after an investigation had begun.
This from those sworn to protect and to serve?
Serve… whom, exactly?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-05db3781f853498493f09544d1a57afd |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: ItsMe: You need an enema !
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-aeeda508cfd1425c91609584e9908122 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: One is tempted to hope that your end will match that of both the sisters you admire, I especially like the part about 'scorn and derision' for the second sister. All that being 'stripped naked' and 'stoning' and 'swords' seems a bit much today, even for those two sluts.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-293b8a49abe6490f9e280c978d33f5af |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Boy, maybe we should make some roads in national forests so we can get some of the old dead trees (spelled fuel) on the ground that liberals locked up so long ago. Maybe if we were actually allowed to manage our forests, we would not have such a fire danger. Oh well, until then, Enjoy the weather!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-459ff3f0d8464a5487c55989f08797ae |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Another great irony of this whole thing: This bill isn't meant to protect students, it's meant to start and keep an argument going along divisive ideological lines, pad campaign coffers, and draw imaginary lines for a duped electorate.
To judge from the comments it's working like a charm.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-fc87a2f13c0f4ab689e34e52f882a59d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Anybody who pays $750 for a $55 ticket is an asshole. That is simple economics. They're the Todd and Margo from Christmas Vacation.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-613f5f0aee9e417a87c813a289ed0550 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Property rights get used to it Lady...maybe we should look in you back yard any junk cars?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-6f2e0d6e4904428d8805efd669055194 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Woo, woo! Commies under the bed. Leave the lights on, mommy.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-6c5d773119fe4f058a0e05bc8288e5d6 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: This doctor sounds like a legit man with a "World View" attitude toward varying political climates. His use of opiates is actually quite sound, and opiates are the most relied on pain management method for thousands of years-simple fact. The other thing is plainly clear-the US govt has attacked the ability of Drs. and clinics to effectively treat pain, without fear of "doing the wrong thing" as one doctor specifically described it to me. If a guy gets a minor injury the doctors are scared to even hand out 3 low strength painkillers. I am not quite sure the motivation here because I think it would benefit the US govt far more for having the masses addicted as can be. Lining their own pockets thru medical service/product in the USA anyway....but the doc is still ON POINT with his approach-this STINKS of a witch hunt.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-d068ddc1ac2f436aa5d147cadc6c29d1 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: This is disgusting treatment of any student black or white, I don't think Adelman can be fixed, let him go.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-e5242bec53fb47f09ecaa0af9c5faf4e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Ummmmm....no, that isn't at all how it works. All insurance works on risk pools. Seriously, educate yourself on this. You're just wrong.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-6c7ce00ecaa243e4b2a7a08630b0c002 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: 800 pounds huh, I am sure she would love that comment when in truth your only referring to her butt! :-) She would end up peeing her pants and running off stage bawling here head off when Trump starts to work on her! You can write that down as fact also!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-e4fdfa689931444c8f920930daddd911 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: As an idea of how ridiculous it can be, I’ll never forget the day at work when I walked into my office, and saw three files about six inches thick on my desk. There was a note on top from my boss, to come see him about this guy, as he was being released onto supervision in the next few days. When I got into his office we went over several things in regards to this individual. As I was leaving his office, he stopped me and said don’t forget the rest of his files! There were two more boxes full of more files. This guy had been in and out of jail, on and off probation, and parole (which can have concurrent or consecutive times), had multiple cases, and even some federal time dating from the 80’s to 2000’s. Talk about a time accounting nightmare. He wasn’t the only one I saw like that either. I don’t think anyone should be in prison more than they are supposed to, but it’s a complicated mess and it’s going to occasionally happen. I also think much of this lays on the offender.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-e21d2b5b561c4b1f9dc5a6eea3e37596 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: This is a welcome and grand asset for the future of Eugene. Hopefully, 5th Street Market will follow suit.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-2dbefcd96b544d918bb634726bd952e1 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Fucking worthless scumbags. And college students, no less! What kind of world do these assholes want to live in? I guess they're practicing to be homeless, a deserving lifestyle for these pieces-of-shit.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-0911e189678d40e18d76b05c8b75a4a6 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Right on, Emma. A free thinker and a responsible person. I bet you succeed where ever you go.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-37111564e06f416e8f81c860b41b2342 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: actually I think Cliven is the one who wishes he had some sort of renter's insurance..
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-bc765a9471ec49cf83043be33833cf8b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I hear where you're coming from on this. Michael, but there seems to be some misconception about the relationship between the restriping and the sidewalks. The current plan says nothing about the sidewalks; if and when they are widened. it will be away from the street - not into the existing street. That plan was rejected years ago.
I am not in favor of the restriping, but I do hope to live to see the sidewalks fixed and widened. In some places, like the west side of the 27th and Willamette intersection, the sidewalks are difficult to navigate due to the narrowness and EWEB's equipment. Add in the bicyclists who still use the sidewalks - not all transients either, JP - and you have sidewalks that are pretty much impassible at times.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-17c4787a36be4ae28cb1a65b879b4b0a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: You know, you just can't make this stuff up!
Hillary barking like a dog. She seems so natural!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-50fdf8ed16e14c41b00556b4f49687d1 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Mark it took a 3/4 vote to tap the CBR whats to say they can't over rule the veto get real! Besides your the reason the whole damn thing is an issue! Did Nancy P clue you in on its failure before our deciding Vote to create this mess. The King has no clothes Stupid
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-69065e9224eb4983bcc49cd189ee4dd8 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The fact that this is even a issue, shows just how far we have fallen.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-390f150dc93b4573b3c167ab13134ec3 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Semitic languages 101:
‘bayt’ (Ar.) = ‘bet’ (Heb.) = ‘house’ (Eng.); ‘yawm (Ar.) = ‘yom’ (Heb.) = ‘day’ (Eng.); ‘halal’ (Ar.) = ‘hilel’ (Heb.) = ‘lawful’ (Eng.); ‘akh’ (Ar.) = ‘ach’ (Heb.) = ‘brethren’ (Eng.); ‘alaykum’ (Ar.) = ‘alaychem’ (Heb.) = ‘you’–second person plural (Eng.); ‘nabi’ (Ar.) = ‘navi’ (Heb.) = ‘prophet’ (Eng.); ‘salaam’ (Ar.) = ‘shalom’ (Heb.) = ‘peace’ (Eng.); ‘ahad’ (Ar.) = ‘echad’ (Heb.) = ‘one’ (Eng.)
OK, here’s the interesting part, so pay attention:
‘Allah & Allahumma’ (Ar.) = ‘Elah & Elohiim’ (Heb.) = ‘Atu’a (Samoan), ‘El Dios’ (Span.), ‘Olah’ (Zulu), ‘Dieu’ (Fr.), ‘Khuda’ (Pers.), ‘Hotheos’ (Grk.), ‘Dio’ (Lat.), ‘Gott’ (Ger.) = ‘GOD’ (Eng.)
Glad I could help.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-ede6849620ae4892988b2885912f3a8b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Nobody cares who you are or what your name is. It's your views on certain issues that draw criticism.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-18d553e193a74d7987aa915ab0ccf16d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Oh golly gee Trump broke the rules, Lets see Communist Cruz has never signed his citizenship papers and he is running for President and was born in Canada 1970, must be Hillary's little Brother you don't have to play by the rules if you are a slut like Cruz.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-aa59244e9e4947a58603e178dcec2a6d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I'll bet Peewee Herman would reward you handsomely too, Civility.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-dc2671fff9554209a19ba8d60d099f74 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Anchorage voters need to know that in the April 5 article by Tegan Hanlon, Tegan falsely stated that I told her that I ran to promote my book – I have demanded of her immediate supervisors that the ADN provide me a phone transcript of the interview which I plan to use in a defamation suit. As a result of Tegan’s patently false statement I have received the absolutely predictable defamation insults from the public. I made manifestly clear to Tegan – both in the phone interview and in previous emails to her – that the ONLY reason I ran is to inform the ASD parent population of the 4 issues already (during my “candidacy”) well-disseminated in print and over the air. Because of the disgusting assault on our children by treasonously negligent administrators, school board members and politicians continuing now after 25 yrs. I will be spending the bulk of my effort overseas. One day the children of today will look back in absolute disgust at the trashing of their champions.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-fd42dfa232f44686ae5b831f0dc433c2 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: These anti-abortion, anti-science folks are not, and never have been, pro-life. They are pro-pregnancy and pro-birth. Once a child is born, they no longer care to feed, clothe, house or educate anyone's but their own.
As for Trump, he's a conniving, manipulative megalomaniac. (Megalomania is a psychopathological condition characterized by fantasies of power, relevance, omnipotence, and by inflated self-esteem.)
But as always, good column Shannyn.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-987789c1d6524f34b105cf293bc217c5 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: This is a total twisting and misinterpretation of HB156. Read the bill, Ms Reeves. Apply critical thinking skills. HB156 allows sex-ed to be taught in public schools by a certificated teacher or by a person who is supervised by a certificated teacher. It also allows parents, most importantly, to review the curriculum no later than 2 weeks before the class begins. Parents, who are ultimately responsible for their child's education, can also opt their child out of the sex-ed. What is wrong with that? NOTHING!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-d955e1ee533c412593d56de04cc8472a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Blankman, like it or not- He has MALE genitals! This is sports- it is a track meet not a social statement. If you want, have everyone run together.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-1071312781824f36b80048358e8b06da |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Then tell those women not to call a guy when he knocks her up..cause you know...it's none of his business what's in her uterus.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-ff4b472654344ddaae4fc3299a3ddd23 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: in the "civil" review process, this comment here came up attributed to anonymous...!?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-757ca15533b443b79393618bf414cba0 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: “malign her character because of alleged illegal activities..she hasn’t even been charged with any”
She is literally a month away from being indicted, she is a hopelessly dishonest person, her serial mendacity is 2nd to no one’s save for Obama’s…and he can’t run again. She pretends to be a champion for women until that support is challenged by her own self interest…guess what side wins? She vilifies rape victims, lies about everything, but the biggest problems with Hillary aren’t that she had Vince Foster killed or that literally dozens of people close to her have been killed. She is a political whore and she has sold herself to wall street and her corporatist masters long ago…they own her! Lastly she supports the TPP which will be the end of the USA as we know it
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-302fbcc6f7ef4529b4306b7546cd36ea |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Skunkcabbage, I've never gone into Great Harvest, and not been treated with total respect and courtesy, despite my attire or tiredness. My money has always been good and service was great. No insult was certainly ever intended. However, floor mopper it is.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-1266b58d69f74db7a5fec95867e018d8 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: SIGN the PETITION@
protectthepfd.com
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-e927ee41e29c4ce2aeb37ee4d1466681 |