input
stringlengths 776
1.77k
| output
sequencelengths 1
1
| id
stringlengths 41
41
|
|---|---|---|
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: What the fuck is with this 'civil comments' horseshit? We don't have ENOUGH censorship from these communist fuckwits at ADN?!!
ADN CAN FUCKING CHOKE.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-a6d0f4006eb54b268a30057344b2c173 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: “You can’t feel like a boy for wrestling and a girl for basketball.”?? Ah, if I am not mistaken girls wrestle boys now. Not a very impressive statement from the 'director'.
Any opinion from the DOJ is just that, opinion. The DOJ is not the Court and personally I believe it is currently run by unconstitutional criminals.
Team participation is a deflection of the real issue here. The real issue is does a penis = male and a vagina = female or is a mental dysphoria of sexuality brought on by societal pressures the determining factor. The second part being, whose 'feelings' or rights are more important, the less than 3% or the 97%?
Personally I like to drive fast, over the speed limit and have never hurt anyone or crashed. My guess, way more than 3% of drivers agree. Therefore I should be 'allowed' to because I 'feel' like it.
Does that offend you? Is it potentially uncomfortable or unsafe to the vast majority? Can I legally do it? No! What is the difference? Morals!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-52bb3ddef157432b846eca37f95d6275 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Three quarters of the LAC received campaign donations from Mark Pfeffer or his employees during the timeframe that the LIO lease was 'negotiated'. Is yours in this list?http://midnightsunak.com/2015/11/02/records-show-pfeffer-gave-heavily-to-lio-decision-makers/
To try to paint Pfeffer as some sort of victim here is utter BS. To try to pretend that any of those corrupted legislators, who voted on this deal after receiving money from the owner, have one shred of ethics remaining is also BS.
Early voting starts October 24th.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-6b8250a6104449e0894891840bacf1a6 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I disagree. Some parents either don't bother or utterly fail at teaching their children about sex and then we end up with child molesters, pregnancies, and/or STDs. In order to protect the public, the education of sex should also be provided in schools.
I would also advocate having anger management classes provided in schools. Perhaps that would teach the public about how to deal with issues without violence as well.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-d2e4979a39e74b49901391a0dab9abc4 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Clinton lied under oath which is why he was impeached. The sex
was what he lied about. Their both congenital liars. Obama is a
pathological liar. He should be tried for Treason. Oregon isn't any better.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-259da3c2112e47069f76de33b3266120 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: the surprising part is that his co-worker ratted him out and that there was an arrest...the part where "drugs are being smuggled into the prison" no surprise there
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-6b64781a693e4ef5862ab45e3218a156 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Spend it or you can't ask for more next year.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-5ec942890b734a768d62e1f15a8ee95c |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: All government should stay out of peoples individual lives period. If you die in an accident because you were not wearing a seat belt, thats a YOU problem. If you get pregnant or get someone pregnant, then thats on YOU. When sex ed was called human growth and development and the teacher taught us about our bodies every thing was fine. Now you want strangers to come into our schools and preach their beliefs on how our children should live. That is a bunch of bull. If you want your kids to learn about the things that dont belong in public education then YOU teach them.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-6254894e62a94b47b8cb3dfc6949cecb |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I'm not an Alaskan or a Dem. I am a left wing but consider myself an independent. I support Bernie Sanders policies not Bernie Sanders. I am sick of never having the policies I believe in delivered. The country had drifted right cos the Dems have drifted right. There is only one way for me too hold the Dems accountable for the drift right that has been going on for 30 years. Donald Trump is a 4 year problem. If I don't support the Dems in this election then they might stop with the "hippie punching" and screwing over the base which they have been doing for 30 years.
Part of me hopes Trump wins just to get the people who brought us to this place out of office. As much as I don't want Trump, I don't want more of the same. And that's clearly what you are offering me in HRC.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-4d034238edea4fd3817aa1bb8d5947ff |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: One could ask 'Is it smarter to buy a fancy $500 tent that I can sleep in for free for months and months' - The answer would be 'Yes, that is a lot smarter right now, while portland laws have been temporarily waived so as to reward those who loiter, panhandle and camp on the city's dime'
One could ask 'Is this guy homeless because he made a lot of poor financial choices, like buying a $500 tent, when he only had money to buy an $80 tent?' - The answer would be 'No, the $500 tent was a good investment- it will last 10 years if taken care of. It was the $200 shoes, the $130 pants, the $70 shirts, the $50 beer tabs, the $800 tattoos, the $140/mo phone bill, the $500 PS4 and the $220 vape that really let to his homelessness."
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-d3ad58a1a59f4d0cb8d876910f434ecc |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: That sucking sound pulling the Alaskan congressional trio into the abyss is the misguided belief that racism is alive and well. First, they ignore the Constitution which is sedition with a small s and then all lock step with a dangerous narcissist. Hoping they get caught up in the grinder that kicks them all out of office.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-2a255237d21e4042b34c78bacb42ce3b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: What can we do to make dog owners care enough to keep their dogs and the community safe?
What we are doing now is not working. Fines don't work as the wealthy simply pay them and the poor simply don't.
Prisons are too expensive and too overcrowded as well.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-19a952bcce6040f8a5c197e0c9c94aa9 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Chris Cropley,
What's racist is using race or sex as any part of the selection process.
You declaring that a white man cannot be the most qualified applicant is the most racist and sexist statement I've read in some time.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-fa5821ea75e04b69934e7d57a6d7f7b9 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Lumber sexual, metro sexual, ----sexual, sheesh does everything have to be sexual? Stupid terms from sex drenched folks of limited outlook IMO. But I think the Alaska Tuxedo is cool - in the late 50's and early 60's many Alaska guys wore them including my dad.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-3e105218f3a441688554d90bf5d4b9a3 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The majority reminds me of Dick Dastardly from the Wacky Races cartoon. He can so easy win the race, but so hell bent on cheating everyone else, He lose the race every time.
Drat, Double Drat, Triple Drat!!!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-ad12d2a600314b86a4ff4b6e4f9032ff |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Oh puhleeeees! Did Mike Arnold write this whiny diatribe about the unfairness of it all? None of the occupires are that special. Anybody that did what they did would have their butt parked in jail too. I guess the moral of the story is if you're going to break the law, it's a real good idea not to chronicle it minute by minute on the Internet. They actually handed evidence to the Feds! These guys make OJ Simpson look like a genious!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-37c3c7256dd94382bc346643bbd25c05 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I am offended by your lack of cultural awareness in writing this piece. "cunt" is a part of the generic diction of British English and is used as a generic insult. Your lack of tolerance for the British English dialect is deeply closed minded and offense. I demand that you take down this article and issue a apology to both Sean Hocking and to the people of Britain.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-9cdc4b1c0b144316ba83537f3d4bd04b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Well then I guess people need to slow down in their car because people have been getting around that way for hundreds of years just because you have a car doesn't mean you have to be an a******
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-daa60d3bd8cb49c394264e5b3d99e3dc |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: This makes zero sense. You're basically saying you like Hillary because she has a vagina and she plays the political game as a corporate pawn and you think those things are awesome. There is a huge difference on so many levels between Hillary and Bernie and if you don't see that, you have been paying more attention to the fact that Hillary has a vagina than you have to either of their track records in politics.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-bd7f6bfb6bbf462e97e141d864eab041 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: "What Zuckerberg has done is to substitute the largely uninformed opinions of one-third of the population as to what constitutes news for the judgments of thousands of trained journalists, most of whom have made collecting and reporting the news their careers."
These would be the 'judgments' of the 'trained journalists' who predicted Trump's winning the Republican nomination for President, right? How about predicting that Bernie Sanders would be anything more than a minor footnote in the contest against She Who Will soon be Anointed Queen of the Democrats? The 'trained journalists' score on that one?
Seems to me that the 'largely uninformed opinions' (I think of them as votes) left those 'trained journalists' with egg on their faces.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-7a67b7cf662341908cd601158b0054b2 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Don't spread Zika...wrap up your dika
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-6970119549664e73afaded74d3181e36 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Show me the statistics which support your position and that they didn't come out of your buttocks.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-3dc4d4afd0be4a6e85a3f748e6919d54 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: So does this count as glorifying the Soviet Union and their gulag systems? Pretty insensitive to the Ukrainian famines of the 1930's.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-f670090adab649869cfbee97bbe15ecb |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: "Real freedom"? Freedom to kill wantonly when YOU decide you're in the right? This is why we have laws; both Federal and State; to control the likes of these assholes. They should all be rounded up and imprisoned, all their property taken away to be sold to pay for this travesty they call an, "occupation". Pure scum, not patriots.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-4d6e799b8d5343339ade294473ba1696 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Tar And Feather Him And Run Him Out Of Town..... Oh wait I guess we can't do that now days..... So just SLAP HIM and tell him to straighten up!!!!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-d998c714b3c54a2e9de31cde52f19f0e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I derive some pleasure from all those pro-life, ant-tax Trumpistas who will be voting for a pro-choice, Planned Parenthood donating, tariff raising flip-flopper. Giggle, giggle.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-ca5d90e3bd344409b219072eab4a947b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Whatever credibility Berkowitz gained from a stand against corruption in the legislature was lost supporting the corrupt political opposition to Prop. 8.
He had a chance to stand with the people who pay taxes in this town but instead he chose to bed with the unions.
There will be some misguided supporters calling the election a mandate but the fact of the matter is a majority of Anchorage voters made sure his puppies on the Assembly will be properly restrained with a tax cap now permanently enshrine in our charter.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-71dd62ace8eb49459e01b50a34c9ae26 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I guess it is decided then. Democrats are worse than racists and bigots...
Sorry dude you logic not mine
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-b680559343b24c8f810e761fa51df9ad |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Honey do some research before you open your mouth so you know what youre talking about. Your ignorance is showing and its making you sound ridiculous. Here's an idea don't believe the stories spoon fed to you by cable new networks.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-65331d4a4d30404d9732ba0aa9cf2a58 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: WOW. I am amazed Will did not render the English language incomprehensible for most by using words only used by anal retentive English professors, but I'm even more amazed Will is addressing what republicans created when they were he11 bent on restoring America to a Christian nation (sic) and were going to restore "morality."
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-a9c8f58f9a994217b089702109ba0643 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Its just not socially acceptable, and won't get me any points on here to just say that I think we should take every kid who is every abused in the village out, put them in a protected environment like a boarding school and see what happens. Most of the strong AN leaders I have known were the products of Mt. Edgecumbe, St. Mary's or Chewalah. While they may complain about the damage it did to them, they returned intact, productive and employable. And it saved them years of rape, incest, secondary trauma and beatings. That in itself should be enough proof that abused children may do better in the long run if they are taken out of the abuse at an early age. Point: Do those people in charge of these children realize that the abuse and neglect has long lasting effects? Its the adults who complain, not the children.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-5bc5c70a7b57462087a8a01770a8f3a6 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: As of today, the three largest unions have NOT signed anything, thus no agreement.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-fc821b7c7dbe48898641f7dd84b0adb3 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: And your lack of a moral and ethical compass is astounding, not to mention your huge ego.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-55b48d46cb9f4e42835699d7a92bb5a4 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: LeDoux intentionally stalling this bill is unprofessional, and moreover, unjust. Move the bill along to let the rest of Legislature vote on it and represent their Alaskan communities.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-f4a292515add40058ba6ee60bcefcd8a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: we were moderate democrats-moderate republicans. the cali transplants have turned Oregon into a state of babbling morons.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-ec620c99fb384f67817f4b2b32e117fa |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Uh, correct me if I'm mistaken but I believe domestic oil production in the U.S. went up under the Obama administration.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-fb98acc47397485d912d3febb765777e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: David: Our youth was a magical time in the past. It remains to be seen if the kids of today have what it takes to survive in a world of little money, where the state doesn't cover e very mistake, and they must go with them and correct their behaviors. I was talking with another elder just this morning who stated her concern that a couple of generations of Alaskans haven't had to face the consequences of bad decisions because oil money was there to bail them out. We have some teaching to do, don't we?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-2b2c354051134feea309357202ef6205 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: And you need to pull your head out of your butt. Get a clue if you don't like guns don't own one, I hate Prius's and I don't own one.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-90481de773784940a5ffd52379193f25 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: More crap by leftists who only want their "approved" opinions aired. All others are of course racists and bigots and hate speech. Not how this country works sweetie. And by the way, it wasn't a girl the article was about - a girl has a vagina - not a penis and testicles. Maybe you need to educate yourself a bit more.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-ef6e125487184886a32616a7229d3ebf |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: You can almost understand why Eugenics was so popular in Oregon and the rest of the world for so long.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-151f825d251a418ea01b9f9e0a9b7d4d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I believe that this is the 8th time the loan was requested, and the eighth time it was denied. It is well past time that the State closed this project and used the money for projects that are actually needed. It is based on faulty traffic estimates. Not enough traffic = not enough toll revenues!
Close all the misguided megaprojects including the Juneau Access Road, the Road to Nome, the Ambler Road, the Susitna - Watana dam, etc.
How about funding the Port of Anchorage?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-b77d07b117044a2ab27ae0fb55b18755 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: this is pure balderdash drivel. The same folks who drove stoned before legalization are the same folks driving stoned after legalization. They have not doubled in accidents as AAA is pulling numbers from their buttocks insulting intelligence.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-b1b77be1a92f4adaab8da0b4f6fbdea4 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Tell us what you did/do for a living, Patriot, because I need to put on my hip boots. I'll bet you're the first in the handout line aren't you?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-590fb74e26654e67ae63272f3f9592c4 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Am I the only one who wants to ask Ms. Weiss how Brad is? Or tell her she better wise up?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-4cf8a043833e48c59220dd8804889d02 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The result of people who believe the government ( The United States of America ) owes them a better life. When In actuality it is the essence of stupidity. If you want to be a part of,America, Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness. you have to work at it. If this was the result of students from any school in America that school should be ashamed of itself.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-03c58542549b4689829748c02a400580 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I was thoroughly against this notion.. until I saw a thirteen-year old girl wearing a shirt that said "Porn Star".
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-6e3ee8c695c746ea85948ebef7abee51 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: So you enjoy reading the print newspaper, but because of online comments you might cancel your subscription? Why are you reading the comments when you find them so toxic?
If any bias (liberal or otherwise) is subtle, isn't that worse than being apparent?
I don't criticize the RG at every opportunity, nor do most commenters. This "story," however, is a sloppy piece of "journalism" and so the criticism has come out in full force. Do you think it's OK that there were fact errors and omissions? This was not a key story in most of our lives, I presume, but when there is a key story I'd want to be comfortable that we don't have similar gaps.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-a34358728505475e809002b29c0e5acc |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Our current system is, a family can get $14,000.00 of health coverage when a single visit by ambulance can cost $6,000.00 not including a month of staying at a hospital $14,000.00 plus prescription medication $10,000.00 in some cases so Obamacare will give less than $14,000.00 to address a $30,000.00 bill which is a simple way of calling it matching funding... But where does the other half come from because many are unemployed/underemployed and cannot possibly pay the remaining $16,000.00 so the plan then becomes use paying patients monies to cover the unpaid patients?!!! wait what? someone please clarify, I know I am missing something or left an important piece out. Don't forget dhimmitude prevents muslims from paying anything into Obamacare...
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-001b22a37eb046ff9d94f0a27a41d47f |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Persey will learn all about sexual assault while living at Anchorage Correctional Center.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-90f2e79954a84328bb5818ea8f7ee61d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: This has nothing to do with race. Fact of the matter is, this principal doesn't do her job. She is never around, and even when she is, she uses the vice principalThe race card was used by Mrs. Lange as a means to keep her job. The teachers and staff have been through a lot. To deem then as racist is sheer ignorance. Color doesn't matter, performance matters. Or lack there of in this case. A great personality does not a good leader make. A leader, in this case principal, leads by example. Showing up. Dealing with the hard stuff, not hiding behind race. Take out race and she wouldn't have been hired back. End of story.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-31f95d9765044123a55d28afebb1c280 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Fuck this asshole and fuck ADN with it's fascist peer reviewed comment censorship.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-dd89c22a584f4839b4508adc8a046316 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Mayor Sullivan, you'll get my vote, however:
You should have run INSTEAD OF "gov empty suit" Parnell
You should have run INSTEAD OF of "where did this guy come from" Sullivan.
That's what happens when you take marching orders from the likes of Randy Reuderich & the THOROUGHLY CORRUPT A.R.P.
...just sayin'.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-28c366fba1514936a54a8c9dd5696d3a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Get there as early as you can!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-332a2479f4ca47fca8896149cef7b60c |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: motley nailed it..."catch and release"...we need to start using barbed hooks...
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-7805257d45bf466fbbdc6c7aa131cefb |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: This is just another of Nathan's veiled defenses of homophobia. My gay friends can't be holy unless they go straight or celibate. This isn't a "challenge" this is prejudice pure and simple.
Imago Dei = Westboro Church without the colorful signs.
Having said that, let's all have a moment of silence for Jules Bailey's political career. May it rest in peace. Ashes to ashes, dust to dust, defeat on election day.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-365f27d5e5a247dfb2178eb6664e1f31 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Send the homeless Eskimos back to the villages for a start. Then round up all the other bums into work camps. Treat them like the stray animals they choose to live like. Shots, tracking chip, and sterilization.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-660d729ca05449ff9c6a2e954f8d2003 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Yeah, Another Commenter, tRump is behaving exactly the way he did as a juvenile who was kicked out of his high school due to rotten behavior. Daddy Trump allegedly put his butt in a military school. I'll be little tRump received some unwanted butt kicking from his military comrades. Too bad it didn't take.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-d70df5cb6a084115af26e689d75c032b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Your response is clearly uninformed. Please read up on this case before adding your knee jerk, "she asked for it" comments.
Oh, I was not aware that it is a woman's fantasy to be assaulted behind a dumpster, while unconscious.
Oh, and if the male was thinking that what he was doing was consensual, then why run when others find you assaulting a clearly unconscious person? Two total strangers can see in a split second something was terribly wrong with that scenario, but he thought it was "ok".
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-070b980059084faaa096680568d3ec4e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I think money is great for parks, but not for wanna be cop rangers harassing the public
We did not have an income tax 30 years ago, last income tax was 1978
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-4966fd81e74741beb1ff27dfb6ebf8d9 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: There's a sitting Republican senator whose son is currently serving 6 years as a sex offender, and then there's a Republican House member whose son is serving 15 years for participating in his friends overdose death. These are fine Republican adult children that love drugs and sex offending. LOL
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-a8c05f423f634dd4be2f83788d325479 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: If Said I was seeing aliens I'd be labeled crazy, yet if your born with a set of balls and you think your a girl you need to be commited to api ! Your sick!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-f5ab67fbc8c24d2ba3b7df1cbfa1a1ec |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Your comment is so inaccurate it does not warrant a reply.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-4e054ae75ee7436d86875dc22a8f40b3 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Yeah, they had nothing to do with this other than supporting and perpetuating gun culture, participating in ridiculous things like the ban on gun violence research, and failing yet again to use their precious guns to stop a mass shooting.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-776aec81cd6e43dda70c97a8d4c8f0c4 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Getting a DUI in a cop car is grounds for immediate termination and the union would certainly not try to protect the cop. Everyone involved knew it.
Monegan protected this cop for other reasons, the union & 'wrongful termination' was not one of them.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-ae29baf1c57e4009a67fa0a0d6a7dd87 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I had no idea there were turns! I was poor and am semi educated, do I get a shot too? Please elect Elizabeth Warren first though. Actually HC flip flopped on both "trade agreements' not that it matters really. It is pretty laughable to assume that one should have an opportunity to become president because, um you want to. I wanted to be in NASA, even received some books from them. Apparently if you want to go on a NASA mission you have to either really good at math (nope) or be a test pilot ( um no on that one). Not really but this is the tone of maturity of this article which I honestly thought was intended as humor and probably is. It is really is hard to tell on the internet sometimes. Either way, this won't get posted and I have probably insulted this person on some level depending on how you view this post although that was not really the intention, more so due to the WW kiss our ass and agree policy :)
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-111babd62a49414198ce4099713e92d2 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The first time I saw Portlandia I figured that the idea of Portlandia's days were numbered.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-9b8facfbe65f4f05bd51236eaf23967b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The national and state guard need to go to this place and help them pack up and follow them to the border. If they come back every single one of them need to be arrested and charged for trespassing on Federal property.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-1c71b97db2fb4adda73f828308f76c1e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Lazy @ss district attorney! Took the easy way out with a deal. Disgusting.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-cf4e23c4fa884c5989a0b879f8cf4bef |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Under the latest edition of the legislative nonsense is a requirement to be vetted by a local school board to teach sex education in schools and at the same time be allowed to pack heat on the university campus with no vetting whatsoever.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-1580af15cd174e71a1e4d86c48e7a835 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Little Dickie always knows best.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-cfcd8b88335e4b6a8ebcd905ab8da4bc |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: No link to another story...not easy in these forums to post one, either.
However, your response shows you have an only slightly hidden agenda about something that, like what's indicated by your pseudonym, is legal and generally accepted in Oregon. I hope your use of 4:20 will lead to an expanded consciousness and acceptance.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-7df515e99a5f4678adee7d96d4b18de7 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The contributions to a church are already taxed. The church is a non-profit, the money goes to many things, including supporting the homeless and other groups, even LGBT people in need of help.
Your hatred and contempt for Christianity will all too soon be replaced with your fear of Islam. Muslims will be nice nice until they have the numbers and influence to rape and kill at will. Europe is the harbinger of things to come.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-3cc3bbdacaaa49949b401900715491e9 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I'm not sure retiring from being a cancer survivor is a good thing.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-a1b1a5e4afc74b0386fde2d7daef926a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: No billionaires here is the reason Don Young does favors for other states.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-2a9fc0e5b99445a3bff844fe86f04af1 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Yup, in your obsession with Muslims you've proved some of their ancient texts are as hostile to gays as is the Old Testament, the basis of the Judeo-Christian moral code.
Fortunately, the majority of American Christians, Jews, and Muslims have moved beyond this level of tribal hatreds and have shown great sympathy for the 50 dead-- THAT is the solution here- how about you?
https://webmail.uoregon.edu/?_task=mail&_caps=pdf%3D0%2Cflash%3D1%2Ctif%3D0&_uid=34469&_mbox=INBOX&_safe=1&_action=show
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-49d6a487a963474282176b79b0fd77a8 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: "facts hold more weight" yes you are right. Heres a fact....taxpayers have put millions and millions of dollars into the villages where the people claim to live a subsistence lifestyle and are hardly making a go of it. It should be called a welfare lifestyle. Heres another fact.....villages have the highest rate of domestic violence, rape, incest, spouse beatings,suicide of anywhere in the whole USA. Things have to change.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-21c4b74f006a4fbba7c3dd5a51948151 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Charter schools are public schools of choice, meaning that families choose them for their children. They operate with freedom from some of the regulations that are imposed upon district schools.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-523e8b30ebd941fdac9e7ed144808c72 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Right. Politically-expedient history revision. Fascism is, and always has been since its inception, a right-wing political ideology. It's proponents said so themselves. They openly opposed left-wing political movements. Frequently violently. And while we're at it, black folks did not keep white folks as slaves, the Native Americans didn't cross the Atlantic and start slaughtering and dispossessing Europeans, European Jews didn't incinerate Lutherans in ovens or put them in death camps, American church women didn't rape and murder Salvadoran death squad goons and Saddam didn't have any yellow birthday cake--they ran out of yellow no. 5 food-coloring because of the sanctions.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-85ef01a967734d0f987d8baedc6de156 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Suzy. except that all this was written and confirmed before kine of like the blue dress distortion and the Hillary attacks on the 7 women Bill had flings with or raped?? Don't you just hate it when facts prove you wrong?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-44a14daf9289499ea8e8501771718cfa |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I have a garden and can buy my meat elswhere. Go fuck yourself lol
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-6d785d24b6824d1cb7581f8e4a2bd539 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: You advocate for a new party so that we have "two strong parties". That is part and parcel the problem here. Pure stupidity. Open to corruption and control as we see on both sides in this farce of an election coming up. It's like having a choice between only a Chevy or a Ford and even then in white only.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-4e41a6dccf4f492783ee25dc9f405371 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Perhaps a modest carbon tax of .50cents for every ton of carbon emission , $5.oo for each arline ticket, $5.00 on each ferry ticket, 10 cents a gallon of gas and .01cent for each pound of freight brought to Alaska by boat and .1o cents a gallon for aviation fuel for all the jets that fuel in Alaska and this money could go to build wind turbines in outlying areas
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-ee27524015c742838b042e3513e915f5 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Being on hormone blockers means she has never experienced male puberty so she has never developed male musculature.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-9b4f617fc5044dc5b0f54006c92533ae |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Actually that changed with more homosexuals and liberals graduating from medical school. Anyone who does know that the inability to accurately identify your gender is a disorder, has a disorder.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-1333a7e0879d4470b96da94e47758500 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: In order to catch them in the bathroom, wouldn't you have to be in (or loitering around) the bathroom at your daughter's school? Wouldn't you have to forcibly remove the clothing and inspect the plumbing of the 'transgressor'? Talk about creepy.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-1d7fa191f45a4c29aaf8c9389f22137d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: What are these terms you're using? Chronic Lyme Cult? Lyme Truthers? In the 6 years since I was finally diagnosed (while living on the East Coast because it certainly isn't going to happen here) I have never once heard either of these derogatory labels. "We must be empathetic to Lyme truthers but not feed their delusions'? Shame on you. Unless you are a patient living with this disease you have no right to so casually discredit us. The most dangerous nonsense is spread by uneducated physicians.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-da8a86e7876640f28fa6675438fb57f6 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Perhaps the most ignorant thing I have read all day. If it is a choice make it, find the same sex sexually attractive for the next 5 minutes. Then switch back to hetro. Do it. Prove it can happen.
Either that or you could stop spewing complete nonsense.
Why would someone choose to be a sexuality that is so hated by society and live as an outcast. Do you actually think out the things you post, or just spew talking points?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-8933b9621b9242bfa0888e778ee2f87e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: 1. Why would people be online when it's pouring outside?
2. Why would people who work nights be online during the day?
I don't know ...
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-b74b11a9a33f4318b25f2d2100c1c3a4 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: “Reagan taught us that deficits don't matter.” --Dick Cheney
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-9c529babd06c4056a7a9eedcde3e0f74 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: One can only imagine how his poor wife must feel at this point, being so utterly humiliated like this by him. What upset must be going on inside her mind now.
Hopefully she will follow Hillary Clinton’s example, and show him some Christian charity, and forgive him for his sins against her and this primate.
At least President Clinton never abused a monkey.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-67b16727fcb44ed692c1f317e63f6ab5 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Odd. isn't it - the same people who support abortions are the same people who want me to pay for their contraceptives, have my daughter in a bathroom next to their uncle and think sex any where and with anyone is a social norm.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-a5a53592e7464c11a2c3c2418c967da5 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Wow. Congratulations, Ms. Monahan. You have just been played by some of the wealthiest white families in Portland. With fair and balanced reporting like this, who needs Fox News?
The mexican sombrero here conveys so much about where this article comes from (sure, all Latinos are basically Mexican, right?... or is it Olympic athletes?). It's the same insidious racism that has John101 talking about people putting on "fake accents", and prompted some parents to suggest that Latino nannies had been paid to show up in support of keeping Ainsworth neighborhood and Spanish Immersion programs integrated at the same school (as they've been successfully for 30 years). Both untrue.
Let's not forgot how displacing the Spanish Immersion program from Ainsworth got on the table: As a rushed and desperate 11th hour response when families in Council Crest, Healy Heights and Greenhills neighborhoods had their children and homes considered by PPS for redistricting to other schools.
Hypocrisy, indeeed.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-e17b2d32e09a4b4ebbccfcc582088ea7 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The Athabascan Nation are a group of people who blame every ill in their life on the "fact" that they are Native and that non-Native people have done them wrong. I am Native and they are a disgrace to our people.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-f056aceee0e445759e068810cd54a87f |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: They aren't "so upset". That's the whole point...this is just the issue of the week, and was initially largely drummed up by the wweek hit peice and their continuing "coverage". If these protestors cared so much about the names of restaurants, why aren't they protesting The Conquistador on Belmont? Or Lardo for having a sandwich called the Pho'rench dip? Or Kim Jong Grillin? The list goes on. These people have not a care in the world for the real issue, they just enjoy being in the "in" activist crowd so they can pat themselves on the back and post cool instagram and twitter pics.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-7906abeb4f89427eafcd4890656bc779 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Even after all these years of global warming kooks trying to scare the population into panic the trees haven't changed their cycles.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-1f964abfe4dd4abb894db099064e00c5 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: To all of you people that say he's impeding the flow of traffic or what happened to the there's 5 vehicles behind you you must yield the right-of-way. Do you see those fluorescent triangles it means slow moving vehicle and do you see the four horses pulling that wagon in the state of Oregon those four horses have the right of way on any roadway. Remember just because your car can do 110 miles an hour you don't have to be an asshole
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-5eb0fcb904d7435685349b8c4bee1298 |