input
stringlengths 776
1.77k
| output
sequencelengths 1
1
| id
stringlengths 41
41
|
|---|---|---|
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: With Clinton at the helm, the Democratic Party will be nothing other than Republican.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-1d51530d8ef84ef2a8dbedd03765a165 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: It's basic human nature and economics that the rich, their bought-and-paid-for politicians and anyone making money off of the current state of affairs, will defend the status quo and try to protect their investments. That is the only reason that the Republicans and the one percenters care in any way about the environment, because they don't want their applecart upset. Change the equation and let them be losing money because of global warming and they will soon be on the other side of the debate, screaming for a halt to the effects of the human race. The simplest path to understanding any problem today is "Follow the money!"
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-8cd9387e3ad84e7d94880ef6aa3fca39 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Amen.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-aee72e2d17b741a8bd78542af1b93c41 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: cities aren't meant to be in the housing business in the first place, that's a market function. subsidized housing in this country for most part has been an abysmal failure so any notion that the city (or any city) is responsible for being some kind of economic referee is out of touch. im just tired of bums and derelicts trashing every viable bit of public open space in this city. if ted wheeler can prove he's not an insufferable pussy and either toss those rejects to the curb or let the police actually do their jobs properly, then he'll get my vote. otherwise get off my lawn....
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-d0ee550da59946bbb6e09069112ccda6 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: So we understand, Chuck, you do support conflicts of interest then?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-3e8ca43bfa1146d094c59c96418407a6 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: My mistake. I got the impression from the statement "currently one does not see" as meaning it is not happening, but it could. Instead, you mean it is not being reported? Or, you don't see it but it is happening? I am confused. Based on those who offered you evidence it does happen, others were also confused.
If I was to say: "one does not see it snow in Acapulco" I mean it does not snow in Alcapulco i.e, it never happens.
I agree we are in a war with a sect of Islam that is marginalized in the global Islamic faith. But this is just a renewal of conflict that goes back over a thousand years. But if we're going to group the entire religion together, there has to be some similar generalization from the number (not just one or two) examples of Christians committing similar crimes around the world (we only listed the U.S). In that vein, I'd include religion as a source of much of the world's problems. And inequality. And occupying State actors.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-18c23ec3e5024a65aaf63a9927ec9482 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Bernie Sanders supports the F-35 because there are 3 suppliers in his state with a total of $128.8 million in supply contracts related to construction of the F-35. Lockheed Martin has been very careful to spread the economic windfall around to as many congressional districts as possible. 18 states have supply contracts of over 100 million, and only 4 States (including Alaska) have no supply contracts at all - so the Pentagon has to roll us into the fold with F-35 basing plans. These geographically diversified supply contracts have to be the most uneconomical model possible, but it greases all the right palms so that congress will never cut it no matter how much of a boondoggle it is.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-35e242b948254bfd8ff928126fe48bb4 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I didn't mean to "like" my own comment; however, if I didn't like it I wouldn't write it........
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-ad1b0a58bae843faa2a545a94a61da60 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: RIP Brady Williams.....Hopefully, one day Lori Fleischman will recover from the psychological injuries.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-ff808117d426475a8d9b389d2de72df1 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: This is the requirements of candidates wanting to be President of the USA. To be morally corrupt, greedy, and liars, change the rules, ignore the peoples choice, buy your boy/girl and shove him on in? Raise more money than opponent for the PARTY, never be accountable for actions. Yet they ask you to sign your name/vote giving them your authority to act in your best interest in politics in State and Washington. I don't think I want any part of this train wreck.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-56315a4dfa774f4ab995cb91bf8747e2 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Matt doesn't get it. A classic is a classic and it doesn't matter what Consumer Report says. I'll take a 57 Dodge pick up over a 2016 one any day.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-9d11b188fc39496796517fe6d2b38eac |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Isn't it ironic how butt-hurt some white men get when there is a story honoring the contributions of a group that they are not a part of. I wonder if they ever stop and think, "Maybe this this how African Americans feel all the time". It should also be noted that these are the same folks who rally against political correctness and hypersensitivity. On average, I would say white men are the most hypersensitive, easily-offended demographic in America.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-7f5945e9ddd443b488cc62af195485ed |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: This is the garbage that sickens me; not only is she culpable she's beyond an accessory to the fact as he couldn't have carried out his acts without her assistance! If she was a man they would have had her in there right beside him but there really is sexual preference when it comes to charging women; the law is always lenient and I think that's down right ridiculous!!
I hope the lawyers take every damn dime because lord knows those kids deserve every freaking Penny and then some for all the years of therapy and medical treatment they're going to need. I'm so upset I'm close to vomiting over this; how can they not charge her? How do you think those victims feel?
Law Abiding Citizen much? Why do our DAs make deals with murderers and rapists :(
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-cf127d91881b4906b975b5890032ca18 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Sex education is about PREVENTION, Nees. You don't have any facts either only rock throwing.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-d7693c1afe0048108537cf66a1764a03 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: You are operating from a flawed premise: predicting who will need to know the principles taught in Algebra 1. You can't possibly do that with any accuracy. Some students may take longer to understand the concepts, and should have that chance. How dare you take that away?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-3fdc830af24a47babd62d52b4f5b2c7b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I tried to get an appointment to talk to Meyer before I paid my airfare to Juneau to talk to several legislators. The reason I couldn't? Because I was not his constituent! Guess lobbyists are more important than regular people.
Remember the old saying, Kevin, "Pride goes before a fall." Can anyone say "Term Limits."
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-f32e56c870994ec6904ea04ac7449a43 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Legalize prostitution is an answer to rapes in Alaska. It takes 30 years for a male to prepare to make a living but only takes 18 years to become sexually mature. This a conflict that fools try to answer with outcries. No wonder there are so many Gays. You seldom hear a male yelling rape by another male.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-e52bdc7d0b8f482ca9c4c0e20c49f317 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Yeah, unfortunately, we have way more than our fair share of morons in Alaska. And, they vote.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-bfc45c3271cb4bce8cc9145c3ad19e0b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Uh Granger. I think we are on the same team. http://dps.alaska.gov/ast/academy/
So quit calling me names.............
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-c42eeeb67c5144cdaaabb22ce7ef673f |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: There are people who cannot find work, are homeless, lost the snap program because of Walker not applying, and the ONLY INCOME THEY HAVE IS THE PFD.... 50% DECREASE IN INCOME, that was miserable to begin with! Life in Anchorage Alaska is torture and unbearable for them already.....
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-3f4d771930f44ecf99213731802262a7 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I got the point. Richard, and apparently, you and your husband, think they are entitled to FREE stuff. Highly suggest you get off whatever pedestal you think you are on as a fellow taxpayer.
These people are taking from a private charity. When Obamacare was being debated, conservatives said we didn't need it, because private charity would take care of them. Now apparently, you are opposed to private charity helping the low-income workers, too. Disgusting!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-1210a6ea34c64a7580c86f7082167565 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: When the Wehrmacht had belt buckles which claimed that "Gott Mit Uns"; the Japanese had the code Bushido which authorized and encouraged the beheading of any opponent who surrendered as being a "dishonorable" person (and did so from the battle of Midway on), and committed The Rape of Nanking, the Korean "comfort women's" enslavement; and the US and Great Britain and its allies chose to allow the continued extermination of the Jews and all those other undesirables in the Nazi death camps for strategic reasons; when Russia, once they were any ally, was encouraged by the other allies to commit their atrocities wherever they conquered, 'moral superiority' is virtually an invisible commodity by any National participant.
The victors wrote the histories. That is your 'moral superiority' in World War II.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-bfa3504ad01d440e97b75f2914f330a7 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The slurs against Hillary should be stopped---- it's time to confront them at every appearance. We all have seen that to ignore them as too ridiculous isn't effective, i.e. Saddam had WMDs, Saddam caused 9/11, Obama is a Muslim, etc.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-76f0bff6c1b64873ad189978776f2f9e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: If there were real performance issues, it is best to find a replacement. However, from the story as given here, performance issues have not been clearly demonstrated. It is important that personalities and politics be left out of employment decisions at public institutions. The current superintendent has some explaining to do.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-30cc75accd1c4b52bf04a43b41457072 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: yucky
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-1b7f1fddd5cd4083b6a9c489783f34d5 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: SW-SAZ was the ""pilot program"" for the Eugene remake of the rest of
our city. I am very grateful to the South Willamette Neighbors and the 4 Neighborhood organizations. I can't imagine what Eugene would have
looked like without their efforts. There were 83-pages of complicated
rezoning changes to single-family homes that seemed ""tailor-made"" for
the developers.
Frankly, I'm appalled at the Mayor's ""all-comers"" forum; public trust is at
an all-time low especially after George Brown's revelations.
It has been very painful to watch our beautiful city trying to be changed to an ugly version of Fresno at ""break-neck speed""...so much tax money spent....so many
problems: MUPTES, City Hall, SW-SAZ, Capstone, Kesey Square, etc.
I also think we need another City Manager.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-2076cff9c11548d09ea5b891f97ff112 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: If you go here - http://raineugene.org/contact/ you can find my email. Email me and I will send you contact information to the people involved in the projects that I have knowledge of (Innovation Hun and Fiber Project) so that you can get more detailed information on them. I will also do my best to connect you to others that are working on plans for the others projects (Farmers Market and Park Blocks) to see what those are and get more detailed descriptions.
On the larger discussion of robbing Perter to pay Paul, my opinion is that we are not, but that is a much longer conversation that would be difficult to have and is getting a little muddy in this thread. There are several issues getting conflated that I think need to be separated (is the government trustworthy and are these projects worth doing). I can talk to the latter, but would rather not debate the former. I get it is an issue, it is just not one that I have a strong opinion about.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-4f4d9bec7c70406fb723b46ba3dc82a3 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I respectfully disagree that we should stand by idly as parents abdicate this very important responsibility. In an age of internet porn, young people can easily seek to satisfy their curiosity and be exposed to very perverted conceptions of human sexuality. Even if they don't view pornography, they can develop very skewed perceptions of human sexuality from primetime media and Hollywood movies. A more clinical curriculum with opportunities to ask real questions and have them answered without shame seems crucial for all young people, not just those lucky enough to grow up with informed and open parents willing to address the issues over the course of a child's development. I'd say the same for immunizations or other public health issues or if families decided that they only wanted their sons and not their daughters educated. But I think we absolutely agree that families need to accept a more active role, speaking early and often about sexuality, as young bodies gradually change.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-3e7a7f0484fc48c08284ef64ce36acb7 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: OK, so-called Last Patriot, what about Catholic priests that hide behind their collar as they're raping children and they just get moved from parish to parish. Isn't this the height of hypocrisy? And what about the Catholic gay or lesbian church member. Don't they have rights too? This issue will wind back up in the US Supreme Court where it needs to be.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-a4199191093045159c6f41b0b06983e0 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Per Property Shark, who values such things for a living, 2020 Franklin Blvd has a 2014 Property value of $4,889,397 and a building value of $2,062,334 for a total Market value of $6,951,731.
What is your source and time of appraisal?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-5a459e9c843a42b48381465ce7c48909 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Little known fact: George Lucas, the Steve Jobs of filmmaking, created the Star Wars movies only as a vehicle for driving merchandise sales. You'd have to be part Ferengi (i.e., tacky, devious, and profit-driven) not to see that!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-576368eda49c40589348cece7bfe5a51 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: This 20 page opinion is a real example of legal hair splitting. The Supreme Court acknowledges that libel is actionable per se (without money damage or special harm) if false information is published in a written form (like this site). They then wander off to the Supreme Court and 9th Circuit opinions and decide that in spite of all that, basically that “two-faced,” “crooked” and “rude.” were not 'provably false' and based on all the facts and circumstances, protected by the 1st Amendment, in the facts of this case. This is going to make such lawsuits even more unpredictable than they already were, in my opinion.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-2439199f501b4fc0bf448b4c100f7dae |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: There are dozens upon dozens of villages with no road access, and no major airport. Why not pick one of those to build a road? This seems specifically about making a road through a wildlife refuge. Test case for ANWR perhaps?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-f29146d96fc745caa2f6da34e8ccb38c |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: This mistake by Stewart goes to poor judgement and more attention to style than substance. His speech made a valid point about helping people in appropriate ways where they live, but he just couldn't resist repeating the story about fires and disappearing pets (perhaps not even true). I agree that Stewart is not qualified for any higher office, and possibly would not even be in the public eye if he were not part of one of the powerful families in the area.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-632e12233a56445db003dc827ce8a2f1 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Just because you post something, doesn't make it true. The highest number of rapes per cap-ta are in South Africa. With Sweden coming in third highest in the world. Are you now in favor of banning Swedish or South African immigrants?
We are not a culture that is pure... sadly, 1 in 6 U.S. women and 1 in 33 U.S. men has experienced an attempted or completed rape in her or his lifetime.
The Middle East is a big place. Each country, city, village has their own culture/ethnic differences. Iranians are not Arabs, Saudi's are not Kurds, and Syrians are not Lebanese. Many of the people who live in major metropolitan areas are more educated and civilized than the ignorant American's who spread hate and fear.
I challenge you to get to know the people from various Middle Eastern countries who attend the UO or work as doctors/engineers/business owners in Eugene/Springfield. Their ancient and sophisticated cultures can bring gifts to our community.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-1833c532bd6e49159cf8e700c96fe1f0 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Nice. :) Although it's a shame the resolution on the files make some of the lettering tough to read. I'm not sure what the last word in the lower right strip is. I like the design of the 2000s guy in the third strip. That's a guy who grew up watching Kevin Smith movies.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-31ef6fc346564cfca7927e797bffce09 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: "July 28, 1868 - Secretary of State William Seward issued a proclamation certifying the ratification of the 14th Amendment by the states."
"If you want to get laid go to college. If you want an education go to the library." Frank Zappa
The Thomas Jefferson Building; Library of Congress
https://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/ourdocs/14thamendment.html
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-00d223f4ee1342e39eb34a4703634765 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: It's possible to comment on ADN articles from other countries.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-b23135496b36431f9983cff6d6cc8a46 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Political Correctness has ceased to have any altruism and has now run so far off the tracks that we literally can't use certain words for fear that some obvious "Cunt" will spend time... not time protesting the actual act of colonialism but the literal use of the word colonialism.
What a fucking joke liberalism has become that these people who own and built a business, working hard to make a real tangible thing, exist in a world where "words" from "Cunts" can actually destroy it all!
Count me in for dinner tonight!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-222151bb76af4c1ba04228c80fb51995 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I stopped reading at "I have rode"...Do you know LTD serves LCC?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-4109fcbb5b0945788abbeaf654415062 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Yeah right.
It's small business, but yet the pro-dopers throw out tax incomes numbers that cannot be generated by anything by big business.
It's either one or the other.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-5b9df387c7f244e8888ad40429c2f3e9 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: don't which to call it ..a sarcastic or rhetorical question. of course the weight falls on us as taxpayers. doesn't it ALWAYS? (yeah, both sarcastic and rhetorical I guess...)
I do wonder about that crossing on agate...regular day at certain time...stragglers forever.
laughing til the tears run down your legs is a good thing.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-0c4f728887994fbb9e514fe0e207f7a6 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Gun control will do little or nothing to prevent terrorism and other crime, but it will adversely affect law-abiding citizens who seek to defend themselves from those criminals. Paris and Brussels have strict gun control. And Chicago, gun murder capital of the USA, has strict gun control. If making guns illegal would cause criminals to stop using guns, then we could stop murder by simply make it illegal to murder people. Oh, wait, I guess we already have that law on the books. Remember, criminals, by definition, don't care about obeying laws, so piling on more laws will not change the behavior of criminals.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-5df4fc9e94da4f56b35999d89fd8ae84 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: What's the product as apposed to the byproduct?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-6098a73839464245af2a338894e5ea69 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: True. Property rights exist. And ultimately have to be enforced. Another truism: people don't have to like or respect you or be nice to you. Another truism: diplomacy, class, and tact can avoid conflict. Another truism: being a dick creates conflict. Conflict leads to people not liking you and not respecting you, and generally become dicks in return. And everyone becomes dicks to each other and life is not enjoyable. Good luck on enjoying and controlling and buying your idyllic vision when you can't get along with a community.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-77c60752af4c4d9bb1bc2a9fb484ce65 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I thank your Dad for his service but he must not have seen what my numerous Vietnam buddies did.
At least a dozen of them I know well learned to smoke in Nam and continued after returning stateside. And these guys were not rear echelon troops but those who were sent deep into enemy territory very often (I've seen their medals). Rangers, LURPs, Loch pilots, medics, grunts and officers; they smoked on patrol or when flying helicopters and they lived to tell their tales. Many believed it enhanced their perception in the jungle which is a positive thing. It was not always recreational. The Army must have known how widespread this was. No stereotype just a different group of men than your Dad served with with a different perspective..
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-74fa8e8f9404425bbbcb6bc7087591f3 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: My friend just told me about this easiest method of earning money from home. I've just tried it and now I am making $4500 per month without spending too much time. you can alse learn about
this trick by the link below
-------------------➤➤➤➤➤www.best-job-site70.comᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵᴵ
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-9a8a118d573f4da9aa9651a3129fa69c |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: It is a little disappointing to see "mainsplaining" lobbed at the Gilmore Guys of all people. I listen to the podcast and feel that the hosts, Kevin and Demi, are very thoughtful about how they discuss the show and both the female and male characters. Is there no room for men to enjoy stereotypically feminine pop culture? As a woman, I am encouraged seeing and listening to these two men so thoroughly enjoy the stories on this very female show.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-58b04aab9b3f4ba590f624412cba8cda |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The main sticking point no doubt is revising the tax on their real employer . The oil companies
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-8bf70bd9fae34356b44379346c9af4d5 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: No shite Rudy...Nailed it, now I must do the task you mentioned...
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-671a8518b12040eea956cfdf775bf38a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: So you don't even manage the state's workforce? An income tax raises $100-$200 lion. Cut at least this much from the bloated state payroll before you confiscate my earnings
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-afdde69865124d1f9a0c49ded6132785 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Bob Weinstein. You should have paid attention to the Commissioner of Dept of Ed & Early Devlpt presentation early in the session. At the current rate of spending for K12, every Alaskan would have to pay $4,048 and K12 spending has increased 28% since 2007 while inflation was only 25%. Actually, total State spending for K12 is about $2.1 Billion when one includes capital spending and federal spending. Include all costs. And you must include the local contribution. The ASD cost is more than $18,000 per student.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-8365cb87564048c4b334cb5ca2419cc2 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I've worked in public contracting for over a decade, as a contract manager for m employer, and as a community partner with it other jurisdictions including Portland and Multnomah County. I have been dismayed, pretty much every time I've participated in Portland and Multnomah County, to find how they consistently fail to comply with state public bidding rules. My experience is that they know who they want to give the money to and they do with little to no fair access, they rarely articulate measurable outcomes, rarely monitor contracts t be sure taxpayers money is well spent, and almost never introduce consequences when contractors fail to perform. I often hear from people/businesses who would like to contract with the city or county who feel completely shut out of the process.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-3af3333c97f24d54a7ff5cce47f8caf7 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: It's a celebration of accomplishment bozo. Having a child is not a ball & chain, she/he is a blessing from God. Get your head out of your ass and see the good all around you rather than being a judgmental prick.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-360a9d9ebf124f37a8704a878e292a20 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: If there is such a thing as an "Ethical attorney" I haven't ever run into one......
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-dfc2108818774e7793fe45480325a78d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Legislative Session is Going on tooooo Long - turning into 'Tomorrow Fantasy Land'
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-1947341494de4f10a6091271cb06f459 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Unquestionably disgusting. Genital mutilation of young girls is an abomination.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-6a897d3791d941d1bd4e2a61ff26270e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Also, Kevin, regarding the few NIMBY's that were complaining about the Palmer site, it would have been way cheaper to pay them twice what their houses were worth, and bulldozed them, rather than building that gigantic, overpriced, inaccessible monstrosity in Goose Creek.
Do you think that Bill Allen's and Bill Weimar's planned for-profit building partners, Jerry Neeser and Mark Pfeffer, wound up building Goose Creek by accident? Do you think that Snowflake Snookie paying all that dough to her friends who owned property out there was legitimate?
A federal Bureau of Prisons head once said, "You can't build your way out of prison overcrowding." It's been repeated, internationally, for many decades.
So why in the world did Schmidt and Palin take that dead end route?
A.) Stupidity
B.) Corruption
C.) Nimbyism
D.) All of the above
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-f4b31f24c78d42bcaa9c37fd53003c9e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Donkel, you are a complete ____. The federal government knew full well that there was oil, witness NPR, set aside in 1923. That Alaska would benefit from your idiotic claim of 'free land', as we have, was part and parcel of what made statehood possible. The feds WANTED Alaska to be less dependent on federal funds. What's with you, anyway? Your constant carping and caviling is beyond annoying. Do you even live here? If not, what happens here is really none of your business.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-e8db5d83927c40248d55ff6cb9997608 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I sure hope that dog was able to bite that asshole before he was killed- and wyatt that is the stupidest answer you have given! he probably died protecting his owner and I give him kudos for hopefully biting or injuring the shooter who tried to kill his owner
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-e81a516a10f8467dbce3bc1c0a2cb8f4 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Cylvia is out of the limelight. Must be hard. And the old man isn't getting any younger. In reality, you can have all the tv interviews you want but the prospects are slim for well paid work. She blew it. So, it must be frustrating. Made all the harder by a looming federal inquiry.....such a waste of time.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-f3897699de0e4b7090d46a42accad989 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Wait, where is Motley Troll's comments. Oh wait it is good news......never mind
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-a3409f84b788415aae35ad624ae25ba5 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Have the cultural environment changed at all in the last 14 years? Thanks for the link, I'm bookmarking it to read soon.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-80c08f08448640f5a2b2f17963bd6458 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Once again, you're confusing sanity with perfection. Perfection does not exist in this world. Sanity on the other hand, can be of beneficial help to the insane.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-0ae1806aa0974628ae7a0bd26554c6c8 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Cruz has said he's a christian first, American second; identifies all our rights as coming from God and not "man", is a dominionist (look it up), and has made plain that if elected he will govern primarily from christian principles and the Bible, doesn't believe in the separation of church and state; and in short represents all too many who would rather wad up the Constitution and secular government and throw it away in favor of some sort of man-made Kingdom of God on Earth, with all the vast machinery of the American military at its disposal---Kinda scary.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-4ef64b05848e4697b6f3a31b1e5a280d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: outsider, what a passive/aggressive way to drag your nefarious beliefs towards sexual assault into a story. and how telling ...this "murderess" had a male counterpart which you fail to mention. this child tragically died of starvation....not sexual assault. another fail for you
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-66d62b36e61d4a92805a9c613ef1707c |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Exactly. Gun owners are neato.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-3f2dd42fccc8454883a62a488e978812 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I'm neither a supporter of Trump or Hillary for the record but in both cases for very different reasons. These ridiculous left-wing claims that Trump "promotes racism, misogyny" are pure ignorance lacking substance of fact. However, the Clinton record is very clear on the subject of misogyny towards those whom they have opposed over years. My belief is that any person especially women supporting Hillary belittles themselves and all women.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-c6cd5fad68f24185a32d6566840c1233 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Ten bucks sez she's in one of those groups she labeled. She's just a contrary old bat. She sure gets under folks skin! If she gets paid for the comments she brews, she's a freeking genius! KK, RR, name some more... I had KK blocked on the other game. Life was good and I didn't have to scroll so much.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-b777d420f7164782b464754764903a0a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: u know so much.. 40 million people across the United States have monumental student debt... in total, a staggering $1.2 trillion is bleeding students dry... grip that smart ass..
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-2a9ab4050bd54bf78f035b5e6d2073f6 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Hey look! It got posted! You're allowed to disagree, the idea is to be civil about it.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-1c94c4c31a7842ef986dc86b21a43447 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: NOT a problem you can correct through legislation
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-6d1b2f232f0249d8bfce10d4a9372bf1 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I think he's one of Dick's cousins.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-d2d2b59bbe554a5c82364ee184a050ba |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: You never know when life is going to bite you in the rear.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-7ae3ba4b32ab41cc97d0f8d824ac1ffc |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: "electric personal motor vehicle" means an electric personal assistive mobility device that is a self-balancing vehicle with two nontandem wheels, designed to transport only one person, has an electric propulsion system, and has a maximum speed of not more than 15 miles an hour;
The state of Alaska requires electric bike riders to obtain at least a level M2 permit to ride. Riders must be at least 14 years old and have a parent or guardian’s permission to obtain the M2 permit. Any rider over the age of 16 can ride an electric bike with an M1 or M3 license as long as the rider has had an instruction permit for 6 months prior to being licensed.
Electric bikes may ride on roadways, paths and sidewalks unless it is specifically posted to exclude bicycles.
Please ADN cite laws when you are talking about them..
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-c1b78708a0ee4e65aff9cb802022fc51 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: With the fear of Syrian/Muslim refugees entering the US, the pro-refugee/immigrant supporters have been using Vietnamese as the positive model example to let them in since Vietnamese and their descendants have adapted very well and contributed to US society in such a short time (doctors, lawyers, astronaut(s), scientists, etc.). I think Mr. Stewart was trying to dispel the facts about Vietnamese refugees with ignorance and use it as a platform to not support (Syrian/Muslim) immigration in the US. It only shows how stupid he is. Peace and Love!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-22d468d14e64404a9b81484c811edf1f |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: And again, attempted murder involves proof of intent to kill. The assault charge is easy to prove in these cases so is frequently the charge of choice at the outset. After the police complete their investigation an attempted murder charge may or may not be filed depending upon what the full facts turn out to be. There is no doubt that the DA will add an attempted murder charge if the facts support that charge. Just take a deep breath and wait for everyone to do their job.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-adb42b071d794d4b89c1dadcd1aebbd4 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I agree that humans may always desire some degree of FTF interaction, but I think "virtual" online edu may improve in quality to the point that it is "virtually" indistinguishable from traditional face-to-face interaction.
Furthermore, if we REALLY want to reduce traffic--unlike rail, and at FAR less cost than rail--we could offer generous incentives to students to increase use of ever-improving online edu options, while doing the same to dramatically increase the number of workers-- many of whom can already do all or part of their jobs online--to "telecommute" from home and/or more decentralized satellite offices.
And if we hope to guarantee at least two years of higher edu for all--and do so "tuition free", or at least "debt free"--I think the only way this will be affordable may be to increase the number of students who use online options. Thinking this will be affordable if everyone attends traditional "bricks and mortar" institutions of higher edu is wishful thinking IMO.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-55b31d0ad3664cd3bbcef358923b0857 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: thanks, man
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-969969edad194a118f2bea5dce387bd6 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Well then, stop writing op-ed pieces about things we already know and get back to work! Every one of you down there knows what the People want. But, apparently, the oil company's come first. Truly a sad and somehow illegal waiting game. It's not like the oilies will run screaming back to ????. We are a safe, willing, and extremely easily influenced oil state.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-a373b1ef069d4443872ceb9075c94bf3 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: And in the Middle East today, despite the fact that President Obama has repeatedly said our 'advisors' are merely there to train the Iraqi Army and maybe spot targets for the 1800 combat bombings by the Navy,
"US Apache helicopters conducted the first strike against a Daesh target in Iraq in support of Iraqi Security Forces in the Tigris River Valley June 12," Defense Department spokesman Christopher Sherwood said, using an Arabic abbreviation for the IS group."
With the 9,800 troops still in Afghanistan, the Navy aircraft carrier USS Harry Truman and US Air Force from Avezano Italy bombing Iraq and Syria, our Nobel Peace Prize winner sure seems to have a lot of trouble with wars.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-7feb82444f124aa4a3133de488fa07b1 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Unitarians are a fabulous lot, but why are they and the like minded churches so small? Even here in far-left Portland. And I'm voting for Bernie, just so you know. But as someone friendly to liberal religion I can say this, everyone bashing Jules or Imago on here is basically sounding like a single issue voter, and scarily given to group think. What if some people do think marriage is between a man and a woman? Big deal. You don't have to go to their church. (Interestingly, gays didn't seem too concerned about not being able to marry until fairly recently, but that's not my point) But to compare the fight for gay marriage to King's fight for racial justice is ludicrous. No one is better off, in any significant way, because the state of Oregon has approved their union. Blacks on the other hand, are vastly better off after the civil rights movement.
By the way, no one is accusing the church or Jules of being anti-minority.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-21c297ef4e824d32991739e112039a33 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: You misrepresent...It is not the fault of the takers, those on welfare etc. It is the fault of the takers, those who suck the wealth out of producers so they can give it to welfare. That would be "the entitlement policies of the Democrat Party" but what Kathleen left out, was the Republican party who are just as guilty.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-2297467a7cd34ddea6f5b76bef32f69b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Intetesting read, now the hundred year history from the miners when the penninsula was treeless, the skilac glacier was visible from Kenai noted in miners logs and the US Forest Service survey of 1917 indicate constant change as the norm.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-727b5b1b1db64f10b9e5f535d0b500fe |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: i'd like to commend the sheriff in montana for having a set..of strong motivators
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-8abdac4a5a584bf1bc2865ea3ca3bdd6 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Well said, rational, scientific based fishery management will result in greater abundance, for all user groups.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-c040637d21f242848f6da86f0f6cfe0f |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Good for Larson, he was assaulted on his private property.
He possibly saved other lives by attempting a citizen's arrest, he was assaulted then protected life & property, ultimately stopping the pursuit. This criminal could've killed children, passing a stopped, offloading, school bus at an estimated 60 mph.
Why is this even a topic for discussion? Vern needs to make sure this never sees a courtroom.
Thank you Mr. Larson for doing your part.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-98f92b1ed65f42d19a766e60cb221cf7 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Hmmmn I seem to recall the Democrat Congress a couple of years ago doing the very same thing...blocking a string of bills - both parties do it when they have a leg up on power. Guess we shouldn't start pointing the finger of blame and corruption as both sides of the isle do it and are equally guilty. Isn't it ironic that the only thing they share equally is a posture of non-cooperation. Don't you just love American politics!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-702cf9958f4747f8b7072030e252d4f0 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: While I'm busy thanking underrated people, thank YOU Andree for being a consistent gadfly and fly in the ointment questioning those in your own party who engage in conduct unbecoming elected officials. We probably don't agree on much, but you do your homework and you've been right a lot.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-bf3e7fa8f4a8434cb3cdddbdfd199d9a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Amazing how the mentally ill are taken serious in Oregon now that liberals have taken over.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-5716c645dd784faa9309e95e6379e8e0 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: "I can walk, Mein Fuehrer! I can walk!"
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-6582b9ceb2c640d9b705c28001ec2e51 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I cannot wait to see if pimping underage girls will result in a larger fine than declining to bake a cake for a gay wedding. It will provide insight into Avakian's priorities.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-58017ce4a6034a4cb1c7511048cffbbc |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Money for camping gear but not a dentist visit.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-f47cb82831144514b0d511811dfbc118 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: He obviously is a ignorant immature little ass. He doesn't deserve the dog back, he's not responding. Give the fog to a hood home so it doesn't end up dead!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-8e453e7f599740d8a7e8770e12fb65e1 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: And this is the exact reason that all pedophiles should be executed they always return to their crimes!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-3990f61b81a44e4ba9fc7871e33b03cc |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Like Medicare? Like the VA? Talk to any seniors or veterans who lack access to a doctor. Access to insurance is not access to a doctor.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-5a7b334318754fc096dabed916364801 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Another Number 1 for the U of Zero! Whoo hoo!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-97ea8b89eedf4d8584f38e0c227ca3a8 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Very funny!!!!.. But seriously.... There kids!!!!lets kick,them in the ass... And love them!!!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-6fe9e415ffac485ba3d3b9e8c71f7835 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Pedophile scum need to be gunned down in public or burned alive.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-958ce11e52ac4a0b8dae8732e11fd27a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Go hug Caitlin Jenner, maybe he will show whats under his dress!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-834ae9ddffa64c0d9bd57d06c06686a4 |