input
stringlengths 776
1.77k
| output
sequencelengths 1
1
| id
stringlengths 41
41
|
|---|---|---|
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: If she does those things, I'm voting for her twice!
I'd love the "resource" strippers to get out of our state.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-9553e1d7c1d6405f961613a27eb4019e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: You mean like the non existent genome that makes a person chose homosexuality then claiming they were born that way? Let science prove it other than the "safe zone" fools who have been brainwashed by their drug rendered personal gratification fools for parents who now demand that any opposing view is discrimination. That born different scenario?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-c05bdfd0b24f4641b0552fb613acc48d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Seems the legislature is unable to understand that taxing the people, whether it is by having the b--ls to enforce an income tax or forcing the various municipalities to raise property taxes or enforce a sales tax. The people paying it are the same people.
Stop kicking the can and do the job you were elected to do. Provide governance for The State of Alaska. you dug this hole by not doing due diligence on HB 21. It amazes me that I and a large number of others could see the faults in that bill yet you railroaded it.
Hopefully we can replace you.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-9af97c153b614de2862be06458e47d59 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Anita Thorne - A pervert, not a pathetic confused sexless idiot, but a man on the sex fiend list looks forward to sharing your time together in the future in the restroom - and please bring your daughter, and her daughter. And you can't keep him him out because he says he is a woman and you can't question that can you! I have never seen so many naive people in my life. And when the first 7 year is raped in a restroom they will be crying the we caused it, not their stupid ideas of fairness.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-81c9161e3b784ecf838bb01920ce3ddb |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The real question to ask is: "What is the probability that the BMDS will be able to shoot down an ICBM?". Show us the results of the operational tests. 50%, 75% more, or less?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-f951c6b3644c4ab89be54ea799215218 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The man votes with his testosterone and brains and the woman votes with her emotions and ovaries.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-7aed4befce9d467bb53fd19d4758d1eb |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Dick, by default, you are incapable of asking any 'big questions', sorry but you are a small ball guy only. Twinkies or Ding Dong's.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-6f1ab2f4c6f04bc88165a16cc849aa5d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: We don't have enough child molesters,pimps,drug dealers,and gang members already in Alaska,that's why your "Lawmakers" are flooding the streets with criminals from around the globe,to keep the jails full,the lawyers happy,and the "Lawmakers" in business..
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-5f444d0c229644c88c970ae22dca8161 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The perfect example of the complete dysfunction of the Board of Game process and ignorance of the Alaska Constitution. "Balance? We don't need balance. We want it all and to heck with the interests of the large majority of Alaskans and visitors who do not hunt." They are so scared of losing any control over their killing of moose and caribou. I guess other Alaskans and visitors don't spend any money in Alaska in pursuit of viewing wildlife as opposed to killing it? I encourage Governor Walker to appoint a non-consumptive user to the Board after the legislature adjourns (if they ever do....).
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-01fc23a2dae44425acbd343940287ff7 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: How can it be that "lawmakers" are packing up their offices and canceling meetings willy nilly - when they have not completed their jobs? How can it be that these "leaders" are held to such different standards than the rest of us hard working Alaskans? Our butts would be fired if we did such a half ass job and then just walked away.
Now they will dither about when and where to meet to settle issues that should have been dealt with straight away, all the while collecting a paycheck and per diem for NOT getting their job done.
Shame on them and shame on all of us for letting this Royal Majority who does their business behind closed doors stay in office.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-b43af6f3e8b947f4978c88e30763a45f |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Thank you Ms. Moore for calling them out. When I was a little stinker, I liked to watch westerns. There was a code of justice in those old movies. When you caught a horse thief "redhanded" the cowboys found a tree and immediately put a rope necktie on the thief. Too bad that today, you can get financing from the oilies to run for office, you can vote to steal a state's oil for the global corporations, violate your oath of office, and plunder the states cash resources to pay the oil thieves by stealing from children and widows. Your reward rather than swinging from a spruce tree, is a nice salary enhanced by per diem, employment checks from the oil thieves, and who knows what other pay offs are in the scheme. We need good people to put together a posse and go after these modern horse thieves by repealing SB21, kicking these immoral criminals out of our legislature, and giving oilies the one finger peace sign. Saddle up cowboys, there are some honest legislators that need our help.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-5e7c580f56b04f1280a7c760080faf73 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Doh! I was looking at the percentages.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-d7accb56efe941e1b41a08dcc4f8699b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: From what I understand about Dunleavy, 2's a party, and 3's a crowd, as in the State's 12 grade sex ed class, designated by Dunleavy's church, and state. Put your nickers in a twist, Call 911, and vote for the Wasilla legislative council of church and state, from those who still cannot figure out, it was the devils fault, they got elected in the first instance.
1. In the beginning, God created the heavens and Dunleavy...So God then created Dunleavy in his own image he created them, and said to Dunleavy, Rule over the Birds in the sky, the Fish in the water, and over every living thing that moves to the ground...2. Dunleavy and his wife were both naked and they felt no shame...
9 But the Lord God called to Dunleavy, “Where are you?”
10 He answered, “I heard you in the garden, and I was afraid because I was naked; so I hid.”
11 And he said to Dunleavy, “Who told you that you were naked?http://www.wallbuilders.com/libissuesarticles.asp?id=65
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-ca4cd12815c6405590debf373ab19518 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: your liberal lying ass is whats wrong with America today. I hope hillary is in jail by nov 9. and what about guns? Are you a freak, or what?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-64d8afb7430a40529908077fb9118a9d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Those Sheep are contaminated.
You NEED to be concerned about the odor/smell being emitted from sewage. Odor means that the material has destabilized and is still putrefying, emitting endotoxins and other harmful bio-aerosols and pathogens
Processed Sewage Sludge (Biosolids) contains a vast array of toxic and persistent chemicals most of which are neither monitored nor regulated.
Sewage sludge of any class is such a complex and unpredictable mixture of pathogens and chemical compounds that even if all the constituents were known, it would still be impossible to reliably assess the health risks if and when this toxic waste is land applied.
Read the EPA Office of Inspector General's Report No. 14-P-0363.
By the way for the ignorant tree farmer, the municipality has made you a sucker.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-56583f7054914d78b6dd681eb9272ea5 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: It is unbelievable: now +/- 12 hours = 24 hours.
The State of Alaska should buy a property with a valuation of $19.2 million for $32 million. Who do these twits think they are?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-5871737c964945249edf10c720cd1840 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: whoever bought it sure isn't going to give a rats ass about the venue
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-83baf2292384473bb9b4930899d4a4d3 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Which friend, Hayden? haha
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-0edea2f78e184e08adcc37a838fa5317 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: "apparently..? what ..source?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-ce803c9069b84b8cb7fd8233e46795af |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: President Obama & Congress made a fundamental mistake in the ACA when they took the public option ( single payer ) off the table due to relentless pressure from the army of healthcare insurance lobbyists in Washington D.C.
Take the predatory, for profit, middleman insurance companies out of healthcare & we will see a reduction in healthcare costs. Until then, quit your whining as the insurers cherry pick the markets they choose to be in - as in profitable.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-c0f19fb3e37f437f9e5b81e890d0260b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: While my educator wife is constantly denigrated by the other side? No way am I passing up the chance to rub their noses in it. Suck it, Bubba. I got your culture war right here.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-e9ce219c579147e59943792f752d2208 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: DOG OWNER YOU ARE GUILTY FOR EVEN THINKING IT OK TO HAVE YOUR DOG CHARGE A KID..YOUR PROPERTY OR NOT,( live in a fence less hood where yes 4 new kids could wonder onto)
YOU FAILED IN YOUR DUTY TO YOUR DOG, ONCE SHE CHOOSE TO RUN AT A SMALL CHILD, YOU SHOULD HAVE PULLED THE TRIGGER ON HER SHOCK COLLAR OR YOUR GUN.
YES TO PROTECT THE LITTLE CHILD.
YOUR LUCKY THAT DOG DIDNT GET THAT KID OR YOU MAY BE DEALING WITH A MAULED CHILD TODAY!!!
THIS KID COULD BE DEAD TODAY!!
DOG OWNER TAKE SOME OWNERSHIP AND ADMIT YOU SHOULD HAVE HAD YOUR DOG RESTRAINED WHILE 4 NEW KIDS UNDER 9 WERE MOVING IN!!!!
YOUR SO DAMM LUCKY SHE DIDNT GET THAT KID WITHOUT HIS FATHER THERE, KID WOULD HAVE WONDERERD OVER TO YOUR YARD LOOKING FOR HIS BALL AND BEEN KILLED BY YOUR DOG!!
AND THE SAD TRUTH IM RIGHT AND YOU KNOW IT!!!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-0ba7beb67b454992a779759ceb679aeb |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Yet you're still free to be bat-shut crazy and make a total ass of yourself on a daily basis. What a country! Go Rhyner go, a legend in his own mind.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-c67b45309ce4462db2f090cbc41de934 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: "Who sent you here boy?...Did that chickenshit asshole Raphel, send you boy?"
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-71e9787e450241918eec2063e1fce686 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Don't the people who pay some of the highest property taxes in the city deserve the protection from the fastest responding fire department in the country? Why do home owners have to defend themselves when all we hear about at assembly election time/bargaining time is how fast AFD responds and if you cut services we'll all perish?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-166f63cc1b9f4e92ba55382901fe68d3 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: No - you have it backward. Crime surged when oil [or the military, or anything else] booms and the hucksters, con artists, vice lords and pimps swarm in with all the people looking for high paying jobs. Many of them leave with fading chances for 'striking it rich' fast. IF we can clean State gov't up enough to stop feeding the local crooks with special projects and treasury funds, they might leave too - the more the merrier.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-55df8ac898834f7cb0c59739ebcc7147 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: no
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-5b565dd5b812443184fe3389c0e12874 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Why, voting for a democrat is like using a child molester as a babysitter.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-9a7c1a40305b4a4f8f1c3b41413b6181 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I want a ride!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-3bc0f343a742497cbb5083c470e56026 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Finally a change and hopefully for the better. Frankly, Disqus was better than FaceBlank if for no other reason than the level of spam.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-592326fa6f474f00a675829424090419 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: So why can't ya just use your real name Ed? What are you afraid of? I get my great healthcare from the VA due to a disability from my service in Viet Nam. When I retired from 30 years working for Wilder Construction Company my COBRA was $850/month for a single healthy 55 year old. Jack Harris convinced me to get into the VA system and what do you know they gave me a 30% disability. Thanks Jack!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-be74672a674747138f33ffb7ef822307 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Here is something for you Mike, how much did he pay you so he was excused for years of sexual harassment? My life was indifferent obviously, the phone calls begging you to make it stop? Your credibility as a business owner IS DONE!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-448d832ad7324640beacc59098a5b440 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I'm hoping those protesting Mr. Trump's political and personal "plan" for America will remain peaceful. I'm 73 and have been involved in peaceful political protests since the Civil Rights protests and the Anti-War protests of the late sixties and early seventies.
If you go to protest, be assured, there will be agent provocateurs present who will promote violence from the protesters. Don't be "suckered" into becoming the "star" of a video clip which only advances Mr. Trump's November campaign.
The atmosphere at the rally is guaranteed to be contentious. Just read this thread of this "civil" conversation and imagine it "live." At best the interactions won't be "pretty." Let's work to keep them from becoming really ugly. regards, Gary
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-ee5158e58fff464ea20fd3c531329238 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: cate arriola is hereby signed up. anybody else want to ride in on their high horse and pretend to be above it all.?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-f007404065b24355b09f5a8b0d80093b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: My impoverished mother scraped to send my brother and I to Catholic schools whenever we lived near one. They were rigid, & not much room for reflection or self-expression; But the academic, ruler and yardstick discipline - and no girls - did help me learn to focus academically.
However, I've no empathy for this decision - and I might feel differently if the sexual misbehavior of so many priests hadn't put the Church in the position of the child-molesting pot calling the homosexual-lesbian kettle black.
The Juneau Chapel is a locals & tourists quiet spot of beauty and tranquility. If they don't want Alaskans or visitors of other faiths or of non-heterosexual preferences to use the Catholic Chapel itself for ceremonies - I can understand that - to a degree..
But the grounds could certainly accommodate a roofed/open deck for others to engage in positive spiritual sharing on occasion. The Bishop's stance would be quietly clear, yet the Shrine still be spiritually welcoming place to all.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-f950260951234a9a9afe30e03815b335 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: It is my understanding APU is a Private collage. Private means NO Federal Funding money. Unlike UAA & UAF. Remember Ernie, its about the young people who may need some help.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-6d38d365d05e411c8db945efdf267a03 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Democrats have been fearmongering about the racist, sexist republicans as long as I have been alive. And much longer. Read some of the democrat fearmongering about republicans during and before the civil war, the democrats supporting the slave states of the south. The fearmongering today is the same, different words only.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-19b3db9903254d828c3ed03118821b0b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: My grandpa was a sparky for years, both union and non union. His last 15 years was union, working on the then new tall buildings in Phoenix. I used to go union meetings with him. The hall (it really was a hall a big one) would be packed with well over a hundred or more men. They'd talk about issues, and then vote on one or two them. He always worked, sometimes overseas, and was treated well.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-2d719583a5524940914581ddfb56d15b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: http://www.alternet.org/media/watch-samantha-bees-brilliant-takedown-nras-absurd-priorities
It turns out the NRA restricts it's eagle mascot costume more than they restrict guns. Go figure.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-d58ca08fde70431eb4654c82319d7d86 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Sigh.... Why can't the legislators use this same type of effort and energy into solving our budget problems?
I guess sex is more important than money.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-f68b0f6afc074ed890f441633b07efea |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Roaming only works if your phone uses the same type of signal. AT&T is GSM while ACS and Verizon are CDMA.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-4a4e2596e9924fe2967b96f7f86d5cb3 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: If she was white, she could have printed the newsletter upside-down and no-one would say a thing. Have you ever heard of a (white) union employee losing their job over a simple typo or talking on their phone? She may not be great, but if these are the strongest complaints anyone can find, this is prima facie racism.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-fdc7d9b6e33c4f15a7fac29f2164a777 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Alaskan government is behaving like a heroin addict. Taking taxes from the fossil fuel industry that kills our lifestyle and culture. Is this really the future you are looking for? Stop #ClimateChange http://www.climatechangenews.com/2016/04/07/big-oil-spent-115m-obstructing-climate-laws-in-2015-ngo-says/
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-ff106354d8e94075acf263475f6435a3 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I get paid £96 every hour from online jobs. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my friend AV is earning £10k /monthly by doing this job and she showed me how. Try it out on following website.U4...
——– www.E-Cash10.com
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-457afa58785a4e4197bec477b5843e9c |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: You're going to try and make the argument 'if' you were Jewish???.
Look up the definition ,if you don't know it.
Your comment was anti-Semitic anyway you want to twist it, whether you're Jewish or not.
And you're not, hypothetical's don't give it validity,so don't play that angle.
You just answered your own question, that disregards the rest of your diatribe.
You said ' it's shameful practicing eugenics 'regardless of his being Jewish'.
There you go.
The issue of whether eugenics is bad or not is another issue.
But what difference does it make if he's Jewish or not?
Why mention it???
The issue of religious belief towards eugenics didn't come up in the article.
Religion wasn't a concern to Schnitzer.
That is what makes it anti-Semitic, any way you try and twist it around.
That he is Jewish had nothing to do with the topic/issue.
You threw it in there. You're an anti-semite (and you're not Jewish, that analogy is irrelevant. There you go. You just put your foot in your mouth.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-23132b84955c48f18b4f20101f2edc13 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Regarding your Fred Stewart story, you need to ask yourself how certain you are before you print a story that absolutely destroys the candidacy of someone who has served his community well. Do you really know Fred's relationship with his ex-wife -- no you don't. Do you know if she is telling the truth when you quote her -- no you don't. Does this one incident of disagreement and physical confrontation with his daughter disqualify Fred? Is there more to the story -- a young woman stuck between a feuding Mother and Father and choosing her Mother -- in a not so surprising situation? Is the Grant High School student's story reflective of the whole context and therefore should be used. As someone who has edited hundreds of WW stories, I would say that this is tabloid journalism at its worst.
If I were Terry Bean, Jordan Schnitzer, Jefferson Smith, Eileen Brady, or Fred Stewart, I would be thinking about the private lives and motivations of Mark Zusman and Nigel Jaquiss.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-4869a127d0ad41b9adfcd5a13b89302a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: So your point is, what exactly? That employers stopped providing benefits, set schedules, livable wages, and full-time jobs not because it was profitable for them, but because ahh...um, what? They didn't fire bad employees? Just punished everyone for some bad employees, forever?
Your point is totally irrelevant to my comment about worker's rights. Bottom line is that employers, big and small, have learned ways to game the system and maximize profits at the expense of workers. Just as one small example, look up the massive exploitation of "unpaid interns" going on for the last few decades.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-511b765097c5409ba25fd3f0257a3cdf |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: They will leave. Taking with them all contributions to Alaska economy. Be real fkcing careful what you wish for. When companies go, after they realize they are better off without bs from a governor over his head, crime will surge.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-6f4c9360f4b34aadbca0943ad6143a41 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: OMG more Corrupt police and government that is worse than Cancer in our Society. Oath Breakers and Thugs everywhere and nothing more to do than flush them down the toilet. Unfortunately for these taxpayers, there seems to have been no flushing because the people are still probably employed and waiting to do it again. Shameful Studid actions on the part of the Leaders.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-36e76c5f6886474bae137c60f44b3322 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Dick..what changed between HB110 and SB21?... not much that I and many other see. http://www.adn.com/article/sen-gary-stevens-proposed-oil-tax-cuts-inexcusable-trustfulness
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-5146abf1249d44268670da0c44313cbc |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Brown's lawyer actually argued that because Brown's rape victims did not successfully prosecute criminal charges against him, he can't be accused of rape. Unbelievable.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-c7b1b4c76a0e4af48c3f598141d0a07a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Call them what you will - care facilities, nursing homes, hell for old folks. They are
For Profit organizations trying to make money doing what family can't or won't do.
I can't help but wonder how often Diane visited her father and if there were symptoms early on that she might have noticed. Call me Jaded.....
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-265b64e4bf824fd58d568b652b514c3c |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: so does that mean whiteys can stop trying to help and let them fix it ? i'm all for that. why, us meanie invaders started it by gawddd, we need to back out of this.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-7b45219f8b7c4ea7bd2eb0ed1a2e0842 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Yep, good thing that Shell could not move forward with production. The associated support jobs would only bring/keep the wrong type of people around here. I think that it is just safer to work for the State of Alaska.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-d6d78095145747d586cea4b031092297 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: if that birdie on the podium at sanders rally in portland had landed on trumps podium...? he would have tried to swat it, cursed it for pooping on the podium, all while dozens of his supporters pulling out their legal firearms and taking aim at the little birdie. ***yeah well, if elected, trump is no longer a "businessman" and the rules of law do apply. BTW - any politician can just blow off their past? "that's the way business gets transacted? " really? is that really your response? that is one dumb reply doc. just dumb. perhaps the dumbest, relevant comment I've seen. and yeah the trump horse and pony "show" may light the heavens in a way WE have yet to see , courtesy of every other insane world leader.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-c3b73162200b45b9a0971af097839236 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Dunno who you're going to contact...But you can expect a call from a representative of the Attorney General fairly quickly after that. You could also get a chance at a free trip to Minnesota with room & board thrown in (so to speak).
Besides, I've already called. Met him in Toad River, BC and fed him some ideas for an upcoming project he was going to do.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-d1f2c4e74b784462ae04766a2e09c5ce |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Wavemaker, hahahaha, my bad, little bb hearted mouse. I've been informed that you are none other than Cate areola, a RAT not a mouse. you all stink just the same. You got to admit though , I had you pegged (BB Heart!). You are too spineless to put your real name in front of your ignorant posts, did you notice the likes on my post were 15 to 1 compared to yours before you figured out how to have it removed? It sucks being you!!! hahahahahaha wavemaker my a**.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-a52c2e20aac84a6e88d0c8d36c46338a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: <- slowly shakes head. We have Saudi Arabia and Iran funding Islamic terrorism, and yet this author claims there is no correlation between Islam as a religion and terrorism that is conducted by "a tiny faction." The facts are clear, it is the major players governing these 2 counties who are waging a religious war through terrorism. Defeat ISIS today, and come tomorrow they will be replaced with another. the solution is simple; arm both of these countries to the hilt and let them genocide each other, and when they stand before their god their god will sort this out for them. But then Europe and America have an oil problem, and then they have commerce problem, and rather than deal with that once, for all, it's easier to sacrifice a few hundred thousand souls each year as the herd needs thinned anyway.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-64532cf64352429780b1dc866fe82550 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Let us know when you get the unions and leftist special interests to agree with that proposal.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-3b367ec167184e979498a2413a27b149 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I'm sure. I am also certain the most recent Supreme Court decision yesterday, invalidating the most recent efforts of the EPA to deal with carbon emissions, is a probably a bad idea - legally and public health wise. I likely is going to be bad for my daughter's asthma, may put the drinking water in Springfield at risk, and have other unforeseen adverse consequences. Hopefully diversity of opinion still has a place in our governance and in our label bound, talking point weighted media... as I would hazard to say that there are ways that "rights" under the constitution can also support what are generally considered to be 'liberal' causes as well as a wide range of differing political views. Thanks for you comment.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-c149ac7354e04b52bb3df55e4ef9c794 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Anyone wanting to again have a reasonable chance at the American dream, regardless of race or any other attribute will say the same if Trump does the things he says he will. Those who stand to lose are the ones who prefer to keep the common man, minorities and everyone they can believing they can do nothing without help from the government. That would be the liberals/progressives.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-edfa3952e0b6486d91a659483d917029 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Yes, there are many. "The island was also the site of the first operational lighthouse on the West Coast of the United States..."
https://www.bop.gov/about/history/alcatraz.jsp
Burt Lancaster portrayed Stroud in "Birdman of Alcatraz," the 1962 movie classic that presented a fictionalized version of his life. In that movie, Stroud is described as reflecting "the ideals of the country whose laws he shattered."
Another infamous prisoner at McNeil was Los Angeles organized crime boss Mickey Cohen, who spent four years there during the 1950s on a tax evasion conviction.
In the prison's crowded cells, the germaphobic mafioso annoyed his fellow inmates by compulsively washing his hands, according to "The McNeil Century."
Charles Mansion lived at McNeil, as a car thief, he moved on to more prosperous living conditions.
Last year as the State faced a 4 Billion dollar budget hole...Repete, here.
Olympia, spelled Juneau.
http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/04/01/last.prison.island.closes/
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-6a613cbb12084ba39af27a43ec43bc68 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Its a good thing you are around to tell us what visually constitutes what is a sufficiently enough female body. Slow down and really think about what you are saying, that you are going to base the way you treat someone on the way they appear to you, wether or not that person possesses any value is subject to your opinion of their bust-waist-hip ration and wether you find them sufficiently attractive enough to make them sexual targets. That is just gross.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-fa2a9c40d79a4d7591ed670a79dd81f8 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Hindering prosecution, interfering with a peace officer and concealing evidence are not of issue with police questioning. If the officer wants information there is a process within the rule of law that allows the officer to get that information. A subpoena is issued by the court and the questions are asked in court, under controlled circumstances. Keep in mind part of the Miranda warning involves the right to have council present when answering questions (from and officer or a subpoena). Remember, you don't get the rights in the Miranda warning when arrested, you always have them.
The court is very clear in that a person never has to speak to a police officer. In fact a number of decisions of the supreme court of the US not only clarify these rights, but state it is in the best interest of those being questioned to exercise their rights under the 5th amendment.
In short, a person should never answer questions from a law enforcement officer unless they genuinely want to.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-44443c0e62e04ca7b5b4bd88cc720bc6 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The Spenard Action Committee questioned people's actions for years and changed the look of Spenard. If a person sees something wrong they should question the activity.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-6c2f77ea17a1438f95778d4877425e5a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The story misses the mark comment hits the nail on the head. The lack of investigative reporting on the story is very telling.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-9e4f0f0aaba44a78b6fe752e5885ed07 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Kc Jackson, maybe you're new to Alaska. Murkowski hasn't just gotten interested now. She's been fighting for the people of King Cove to have a safe evacuation route for years, and not just the years she's been up for reelection.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-01ebdbad15234b82a8e958d89775aedc |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: But under the law. a gay baker could not refuse service to someone on the basis of religion, national origin, race, color, or sex. The law should treat EVERYONE equally.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-b782b6d9786e47019a674f4cd1e01e99 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The real story here begins with LTD and the Mayor of Springfield conspiring to eliminate the true stakeholders from the process of planning. They screwed the taxpayer and it should be a crime. The Main Street stakeholders advisory committee appointed by City of Springfield consisted of 17 handpicked people. One Mike Eyster was the former board president of LTD. Another Randy Hledck was the president of Wildish Land and Development. Yes he works for the same company group that was the only bidder and awarded the 56.5 million dollar contract to build the West Eugene EmX. There were 9 0r 10 other members of the committee were public entity employees with no property ownership in the corridor. This group of course advised to build EmX on Main street despite obvious conflicts of interest. During the process LTD, City of Eugene, and Springfields city councils and Mayor were informed of the conflicts in public meetings and all chose to ignore them. Corruption is the foundation.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-fabbb37ae89543e2a5d6bf3f1b6b94af |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Alaska's Mission of Mercy needs to enroll on the Pick, Click, Give site. This is too important of a community service to let die. Can't someone out there write state and federal grants? After all, Tammi Wilson help write a $1 million grant for one of her former staffers and got away with it. That grant money went into the former staffer's private business.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-f4c2c89ca5de4e968b40f24c062e41a0 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Oh, for pete's sake. Mr. Dunleavy's insistence that the less kids know about all aspects of sex is ridiculous. The fact that he insists on throwing up barriers in an attempt to block thorough sexual education is quite annoying, if not suspect.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-68b3864a7f5e422da33c3ed2c6770ffc |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: "ferret out the weasels" damn! I do not have a good comeback for that one. Well played, ma'am, well played.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-b160addff1c3434b827f2c933bf7fd05 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Don't let your dog run loose, especially during calving season. I feel for the women, but loose dogs are commonly perceived by moose moms as threats.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-c582105c245d482888abc6c9f77212b7 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I live in Colver's district. It certainly is conservative as the reporters state, but I would not classify it as strongly Republican. My hunch is that more of Colver's constituents appreciate his independence and willingness to vote his conscience than they are concerned about him toeing a party's line. For some elections, the results from Sutton resemble the results from Talkeena more than those of any other Valley precinct.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-adf1997a1ab24bcfb8c96ae762939187 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Electricity can even confuse those who are not sharp enough to get thru 8th grade, reading, writing, or arithmetic. When reviewing a Supreme Kangaroo Judicial Court (see; Blacks Law Dictionary) for those who flunked out at Harvard in Massachusetts, just goes to show you, that education is the biggest waste of electricity ever before seen in Ben Franklins State, of imbeciles inbreeding, on a State Supreme Court. Those Lightining Volts, of the innocent prosecuted, and the guilty as free, just like in Alaska, shown best with the Fairbanks Four. Many Judges are not sharp enough or even qualified, to be dog catchers. They left their brains, in the ditch, at Harvard Law; GPA ZERO.
"Three generations of imbeciles are enough."
Mr. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, the expert, at shooting democrats, from the Harvard Class of 1861, when Alaska was still Seward's wet dream.
8th grade civics?
UA, none required.
8-0,
March 21, 2016
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-10078_aplc.pdf
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-ef099858db9740dc9184d81bdd01df93 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: WHY the vengeful obsession wishing that criminals will be sodo mized in jail? Animal abuse is an inexcusable crime. So is rap ing another human being, Jade! Tormenting one criminal by allowing him to be ra ped by another will not undo any animal abuse...
I don’t think that celebrating sexual violence shows much care for animal wellbeing! All it shows is a twisted reflex towards vigilante cruelty, an equally criminal attitude.
I want all ra pists prosecuted, and I am outraged by any wishing for punishing criminals extrajudicially, throwing them in a dungeon to get rap ed by "Bubba."
If any jail guard allows ra pists to attack other inmates in hopes of heaping punishment up them, those criminal guards need to be arrested!
I think ALL cruelty is disgusting! Wishing ra pe upon others is unacceptable! Our laws can punish the crime of animal abuse, without us sinking down to the same degenerate abusive level, which is what wishing for the ra pe is...
Ra pe promotion? For shame!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-9fb75c26cb614605be90f11c95c6f81c |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: No, Rhyner, it's always a dark day for you. Take an increase of Vitamin D, which may help with your depression issues, or go out and do some volunteer work.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-36e57bd4dbaf4ff5bc45e854aeb61262 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: The school already fired him. No school would ever hire a teacher that has had sex with a student. Do you not realize the liability they would place upon themselves if they did that?
Besides, he deserves to never teach again. That is a most severe abuse of authority. And he is more than young enough to start a new career. So starting over in a new career is no problem by itself.
But I don't honestly see what making him a registered sex offender and putting him in jail accomplishes. That will really have a most severe impact on his life, and make it difficult to get employment.
Having him lose his career of being a teacher is enough punishment in my book.
.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-a8e8dfc805f14122a82e0de937ba64d2 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: We need to stop aiming our efforts at shadows. Overdoses are the result of making possession of meth a crime. European nations understand this mis-directed thinking. They don't have the problem America has. Drug use in America is an avoidance behavior - running from pain of discrimination, joblessness, poverty, mental illness and a host of other "inducements." The cost of incarceration is so high that even a tiny slice of those costs could transform our society's attitude toward mental health rather than cops "spanking" everybody in sight. Abusive daddies never solved a problem. They cause them.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-a64b66ee92974b639a9332b54a58da56 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: TajMahawker has more smokey back rooms than the Capitol. It was specifically designed that way for a reason. Where they're located is irrelevant. Who gets elected is the issue here. Don't turn this into a capital move debate. Focus on the corrupt bastards who pulled this sad stunt.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-e3858ad2248147b1b37e69c25cd13222 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: That alone seems to speak loudly for socialization and relationship education programs in school that these parents failed to provide at home - even though everyone says it was their responsibility .. If high school boys and girls don't get this from parents, where else should they go for this as they grow toward adulthood? One might not be dead and the other not locked up for life if they had had some earlier preventative education that taught them effective, reasonable ways to address difficult, hormone-raging situations.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-602d109e4fc24e57aade2e8ae1955f3d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Why are we allowing this team to lead the district? WHY?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-fdb42e23a85c41778ca0326ba82cae37 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: This occurred between 10th and 11th street, not 14th and 15th.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-ee1d16329b0948fcb6ef21b9647beaef |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Obama proved that the greedy, lazy, & uninformed would sell their liberty, & self respect for government, i.e. money stolen from others, hand out, benefit check, etc.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-9bda291a94514ac7bb9b1da4248c098d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: At 15 an hour a machine will be making your lunch and it won't be free. Lefties have no understanding of simple economic principles and they prove it every time they advocate for the government artificially raising the min wage
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-ce891f61118941458c1ab7db654c402a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: There is a ton of data on bird collisions which are a decent analog to drones. I worked on a Twin Otter that hit a seagull at ~ 120 knots. The hit was on the leading edge of the wing, centered on a rib, strongest part of the surface. The wing was caved all the way back to the spar, ~ 2 feet aft. The deice boot was destroyed and significant trim was required to roll the aircraft back level. Yeah, a drone would be a nasty encounter.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-15f656f86c1a41b5b020c2969b1b1e54 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Pretending to be something you are not, to suck some money from the feds. God Bless America.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-c43af0d96160407ca8b31d43922f719d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Really? Like dead rapists, with a gun, badge, and jail cell. Campus police? Spell psychopathic narcissists? Fairbanks Four? In training?
http://www.truecrimereport.com/2011/05/ex-deputy_sean_moore_admits_to.php
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-f81cc62831024b3cba9444a21679d06d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: I suspect that Pavel was not liked by some within UO. UO administrators are not subject to any serious review or quality standards and thus feel free to act out their emotions rather than represent we the citizens of Oregon as they should. The trouble with the sex charge against him is that objectively it is purely her word against his word. The story here does not mention any witnesses. The story does not suggest that witnesses were sought. A crowded venue? Did UO even look for witnesses who saw the two together?
Some will say that the female should be believed - always, and that it is anti-woman to even consider whether she might not be telling the whole story. This is not consistent with core American philosophy. We as a people also need to think whether actions that leave zero detectable consequence are as serious as we make them.
I hope he wins several million unless significant transgressions can be proven.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-3895c6cb9e7e490e9ed55c2b9618ef3c |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: garycrum - you, sir, are quite the savior aren't you?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-37f2324516c34e35900a0e4c54708fcc |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: There for awhile, I thought all the clowns in Oregon worked for PERS, CoverOregon, EWEB and LTD. Now I see that some work for UO too.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-875ccf788b084d45b5f1361a42a21187 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: And Dick shows that he can easily outdo his last absurdity....
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-adafa699a1364b8288cf43c14a38e284 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: This is the most infantile thing I have heard of in Portland.
It is a prize winner. It must earn a trophy for its outstanding contribution to the annals of this community's ignorant pettiness. If a not very bright 5th grade class mutinied and took over the elementary school, this is what they would cook up.
Sail on, ye little pirates. I'm off to dine at the Saffron Colonial.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-053f5350519e40ecbfe91a3143973de6 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Come on Amy, you really think armed students will stop all rapes? Like there aren't any rapes in Texas, or downtown Anchorage? There's more than guns that go into campus security. How about listening to the Board of Regents and Student Governments and taking their advice?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-a6f295f02b6e4cd8858778fcb4d03f4e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Val Hoyle is the closest thing in the races to Trump. A true bully who you characterize as an "extrovert." We yes, she is that.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-f8ffaa7ac2df4069a9b9df6d7e49c994 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: While agree whole heartedly with Outsider's perspective I would add the following.
[1]. The whole issue of abortion would have been and would certainly be better handled on a State by State bases by the voters of each State.
[2]. The SCOTUS was never intended to act as an activist court in any matter of the law their existence is to interpret law not write new laws. Roe vs. Wade, homosexual marriage are such examples.
[3]. Abortion should not be funded by federal or State tax dollars with only three exceptions rape, incest, and the medical verification of the potential loss of the mothers life.
[4]. I believe one would be hard pressed to find many individuals who hold firmly to a 100% pro-life stance. While I personally do not support abortion i.e., a form of terminal birth-control on demand, I do support abortion in cases of rape, incest and a medical verification of the potential loss of the mothers life.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-c244654833024decb58feef911984ba3 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Good point, it would be more tax efficient to just keep the money. I prefer a sales tax though, it collects money from people who come up for the summer and take the money they make away. I also believe that our subsidies are too generous, when you can make more than 100% of the cost of a dry hole, there is no incentive to spend wisely. And we aren't getting a return on that investment directly. If we invest in a well, we should get some of the profit.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-07e3b9a5302745178d6c3f2c1cd7590f |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: Why? Is that so hard to believe? She not saying it's unique to natives but it is a fact and since we are discussing native foster care/adoption it is relevant. Your comments are racists. Are you who defensive that you can't even aknowledge a problem that does exist? Again not unique to natives - but certainly aren't exempt either. But this from a person who makes a distinction between neglect and abuse as if there is a difference!? Your true intelligence is showing along with your bigotry ...
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-a27aa717c3bc407eba88c091d54bd5cf |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: [Here's a relevant quote.](https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-nxulBvR_C10/TyUCme22ieI/AAAAAAAAO5Y/Ly6lN61B_as/w506-h285/dumbledore_quote_w1.jpeg)
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1723-f25dc407fa2e4d95a6a3fcc9007a389b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Man, they're being sued for NOT growing pot? Somebody call Alanis Morissette, because this is ironic.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: This story gets more ridiculous by the hour! And, I love that people are sending these guys dildos in the mail now. But… if they really think there's a happy ending in this for any of them, I think they're even more deluded than all of the jokes about them assume.
Output: No
Negative Example 2 -
Input: FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
Output: No
Now complete the following example -
Input: "no Supreme Court nominee should be confirmed during the last year of a presidential term" Sen Joe Biden -1992
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1723-c1f3b12017b9417481a8927e19811d14 |