Dataset Viewer
input
stringlengths 1.66k
2.64k
| output
sequencelengths 1
1
| id
stringlengths 40
40
|
|---|---|---|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Senator Ellis is a great public servant. He was a mentor to me when I was first elected. His advice was "Always vote your conscience." He is a man of great integrity, and he will be sorely missed in the Senate.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-b2fade62e6dd47289c4f6794c167df36 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: By only mentioning 'hatred' of clinton as modus operandi and not stating clearly it is disdain and distrust of all MSM that is driving this as the media are clearly part of the problem, in cahoots with the neoliberals wanting to destroy local populations for their utopian ideals, publishing facts that are not facts while accusing others of same.
We are starved in Canada for a proper political party that puts patriotism over migrants for example - a majority p.o.v. in Canada whitewashed out of existence in MSM other than one or two voices in entire country.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-6a2147c878834e0b8a0b1ab531f0b081 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: What, that one example in 2 million. Get a life and get real. In the real world in which I worked in this never ever happened
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-d6427ae8e5b14f5ab43c36e5c3241cd7 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: If you're incapable of offering anything beyond pointless sarcasm, why bother posting?
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-c36113ebdcce484e824f2d050b63e998 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: .
Over all it has been a good year for the Trudeau Liberals. What-ever "irregularities" the opposition came up with on the "fund raising" file are redundant since it was done legally very much as it was done legally by the Harper Conservatives 100's of times over.
The one positive Mr. Martin forgot/omitted to mention; Trudeau scrapped the majority of Harper's insidious/egregious legislation. That alone makes this a great year for the Trudeau Liberals.
.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-1da116d58bff4d389be974f6f00d520a |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I agree. YOU PROTEST ON YOUR OWN TIME. WHEN YOUR IN THAT CHAMBER, YOU REPRESENT YOUR CONSTITUENTS, NOT YOUR PERSONAL AGENDA. YOUR KNEELING DOESN'T DO ANYTHING BUT GETS YOUR NAME IN THE NEWSPAPER. If you want to make a statement and change something, "adopt a homeless person" and change their life for the better. Our Anchorage Assembly must be pre-testing the local cannabis.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-69d12344ae584f0b90e1b0543a9cb64f |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: This is really hard. You bargaining with a bully that wants the right to slap on tariffs at any time which would know from experience in softwood lumber would be applied for political reasons rather than reasons of fairness. At the same time, the bully teases you with potential access to a market vital to the present configuration of our economy. It isn't about friendship or partnership - it is avowedly "me first and only me". I don't envy our negotiators and I can only say it heightens my enthusiasm for seeking greater partnership with Europe. There are so many great Americans and great American companies that I really mourn for the loss of friendship the Trump administration implicitly (in our case) represents. With the Mexicans it is explicit.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-247615feb7e441279c5eb510b5ad68b7 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Another article of little to no value to Canadians, repeating biased ideas promoted by CNN seemingly, sad state of affairs our biased and misleading media is in Canada. If this continues we may as well shut it down and get new media companies all together.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-62663433b4d04e25815bf4fb04a101ae |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Its approx. 270 miles from Chicago to Louisville. How easy would it have been to use a company vehicle to re-position the crew? This ugly incident doesn't say much for United's manpower deployment and planning.The lawsuit alone will be expensive enough, but the ill will of the travelling public will be far greater.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-a6946f2e3630424f9be5a987ab549c34 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: It's dramatic fluff bob. The triumph of evil requires much more than for good men to do nothing.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-b3c9c87c69bf4fbaaa2091919f4e78ab |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: The Conservatives are sure doing their best to upset the apple cart.
Their political agenda counts more for them than their countries welfare.
Andrew Scheer has revealed his true colours..
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-b19284caaf754f86b6bccedea553f649 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Leslie McGuire's claiming of "reimbursement" for lodging and meals at the federal per diem rate while on vacation in Germany is outrageous. Immoral. Unethical.
Question: How many Alaskans think that your Permanent Fund Dividends should be reduced to pay for lavish perks and personal vacations for Lesil McGuire nd other legislators.
Answer: None.
Question: How many Alaskans think legislators should get thousands of dollars in "reimbursement" for lodging and expenses in excess of actual expenses.
Answer: None.
You gotta love some of the statements from legislators that "the accountants made us do it," or the $247/day $247 doesn't cover more than living costs.
If the latter is true, why in 2015 when Rep. Reinbold paid $850 in rent plus $100 in utilities, a total of $950/month, and Rep. Vasquez paid $650 in rent, plus $100 in utilities, a total of $750, both legislators received about $235 per day, or $7,000 per month.
Insist on reform, and hold onto your wallets.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-f7b75426f7684fda956665e12b0967df |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: the MSM are so biased why shouldn't Trump bypass them? Harper played by their rules and got scorched each time. He should have ignored them
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-553fc693a41a40d1a3cc703b3711e335 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Ya, like Trudeau !
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-c40778db159c4c94822f07e4cf73091d |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Which "victims" is Munoz referring to? The victims in both of these rape cases are CHILDREN. Munoz never in either of her letters once mentioned the children who were raped by their parents and foster parent. Adding insult to injury, Munoz is only backing away because she's getting the message that law abiding Alaskans with morals are going to take her legislative seat away from her; as it should be. Too little too late, Munoz. How dare you back peddle for the wrong reason. Alaskans should continue pressuring Munoz to resign from the Legislature. Anything short of that is unacceptable.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-66f515fc53fb4203b07b90e5464ecb36 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: "...Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says the presence of senior Chinese government envoys and wealthy business executives at a private Liberal Party fundraiser in May was his way of trying to attract investment dollars to Canada from China..."
You are kidding? You really expect anyone outside of the Liberal base to believe that?
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-144939fef5964f8ca1ffbf42c4c41931 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: You are completely wrong. Just because something is "legal" does not compel anyone or any particular institution to provide it. Faith based organizations provide important services to our society and they are to be commended for doing so. It simply does not follow that just because a faith based institution refuses to provide something that is contrary to that faith that in turn it should be forced out of business entirely and in the process punish those who receive the much needed other services provided by the institution. That would be perverse.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-b520fa5af1744d6ca19d6e4a0d2aa44c |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: just announced today. You have an unrealistic expectation of immediate action. Meanwhile, please tell me what Harper did when Cat locked out and then closed its locomotive facility in London about 4 years ago? Short answer - NOTHING
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-535a11126b6d4615b23099168cbe2ec3 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Totally agree - everytime I see a comment like this it just pushes me to the Liberals
EVerytime I think I'm losing faith with them, I see the vitril and dumbness of CPC commentators and I'm reminded why I support Mr. Trudeau
Ironic that the very attacks intended to bring Trudeau down actually help him. Only by attacking policies does the opposition have a chance. The "just not ready" didn't work in 2015 and certainly won't work in 2019.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-8f160315c0e44c198ff2137a13cc1770 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: The US position on this had nothing to do with Israel or Palestine, but everything to do with Obama's efforts to undermine Trump at every turn before he leaves office. Kerry is a fool as Obama used him on this one, and today on the Russian hacking stuff. Odd that both of these thing took 8 years for Obama to act. Obama's real legacy will be that he was the President that created Donald Trump. LOL!
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-0ef4b6f097c349e9b89eafac9fa6e3f7 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: They need to vote you out!!!! Your a disgrace.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-26bfdda40c06458ca9488e9bf4842973 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Lesley Bikos' contention that police forces are inherently toxic is so silly and immature it is a wonder why the Globe even provided her a forum.
Really, Globe. Why DID you run this ridiculous nonsense?
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-868364a96363497e8db696a2ea52cfce |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Amy2014
Abortion is not a healthcare decision its a lifestyle choice, except in very extreme cases.
This "Protecting a Women's Right to Choose" nonsense is typical Liberal Psychobabble.
Abortion in most cases amounts to a means of ridding oneself of having to take responsibility for ones own actions, to act in an irresponsible and unaccountable manner!
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-26a78adf896f4ab7b8c79daec1f0bf3a |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Canada has fake journalists interviewing a fake Prime Minister. Can't get any lower than that.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-2f50fe26edf448b698aa5755c94b049b |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: You would be unable to cite sources for the"illegality" of the settlements, as there are none. The settlements are built on disputed lands no doubt, but lands that no "Palestinian" country or sovereign political entity has ever had title to.
Israel has every right to construct settlements on "disputed" lands, until such time as title can be proved to be held by another sovereign entity. The court of public opinion, led by 180 countries that have routinely demonstrated an overwhelming anti-Israel bias, has no standing in this matter, except to those that share that bias.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-d80762469771455c8d6fa0e4c4141c93 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: "You have to ask a question of me first – because you get a chance to talk to the Prime Minister,"
Good old humble Justin. LOL.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-569ed1057a684a369674b007f878c753 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: A unanimous 2010 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, mostly Harper appointees.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-f7f22a96c6e84cce83742c03bfc5d8a0 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: That is very good advice from a practical guy from Alberta. Bravo! Totally agree. So I'll say it again, get rid of wasteful practices instead of more revenue to continue wasteful practices (another example - the spectacular failure of the federal payroll system and IBM blundering on, without penalty).
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-446c67811daf4995842fce09ac989a59 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Like him or loathe him Donald Trump built business empires which employed thousands before he became president. Trudeau drove expensive cars while working as a part time drama teacher, snow board instructor, bouncer, etc before becoming PM. Ya, you're right. They are a study in contrasts.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-10d3b9543fc2446e82a5e0423284a369 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I wish a speedy recovery to the officer and thanks to all others for removing this scum bag. Please remember, the vast majority of Alaskans are rooting for you and would back you up in a heart beat.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-c289ae6a7d4e482ab3fd0042e5f87092 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: too bad she didn't point out Coderre's hypocrisy. He wails against a pipeline but crows he is an environmentalist by dumping billions of litres of raw sewage into the St Lawrence
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-87a22e85f614415592ba5d370a50e9fc |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: The anti-police rhetoric has reached out and touched Anchorage. When national leaders basically legitimize violence against police by not speaking out against it this will happen more and more. How many police have died in the line of duty this year compared with years past? This may be just a random incident but something has to change in our national dialogue
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-f588bbd41da84a3ebdaa12f2904307bf |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Miller still hasn't accepted Trump won. It's like an itch he can't scratch. It's driving him insane..
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-c0f7d84c52324458942c41857d8cb1fe |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: "Pass off"? Since when is a resident of a European country not a European?
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-2beb80e3d4e5410d93d6f82d385bd426 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Great article. "A free society should honour the life, choices, and dignity of all of its members. A bill that could lead to the denial of government services on the basis of religion does not conform to this ideal." I absolutely agree. Once we allow the state to meddle in the life choices of a few minority members, we open ourselves and other groups to be the next target.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-984076c6793649c7ad204dcfbabdad40 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Wayne Easter, a 24 year Liberal MP from PEI, has had senior parliamentary secretary and committee roles and was in cabinet as Solicitor General in the Chretien government.
This makes him a double threat to Butts and other central Canada big city slickers (accent on slick) in the PMO who control the government agenda and messaging and try to control the MPs.
Being from PEI, he has an "annoying" tendency to be a down to earth, common sense, honest to a fault parliamentarian whom speaks his mind candidly about government gaffes and stupidities even by his own party.
Being a 24 year MP, he knows how parliament should work, how the government should interface with opposition MPs and how major changes to parliamentary rules and to tax and other fundamental policy should be developed and rolled out.
In April, he criticized the government's attempt to muzzle and marginalize the opposition.
Now he is defending small business from the new tax grab.
God bless you, Wayne Easter!
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-e12e61bd3eae4bf0b3b3d4146541e05f |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: For those of us who were questioning how exactly was beholden to foreign interests, 1 million dollars to the Foundation looks like a pretty good answer.
Trudeau should resign.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-67a0b9ab6ee549ada57cf22aa3783803 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Has anyone thought to ask how this was handled by the minsters in the previous government?
Or perhaps Mr Chase and Mr Fife were completely incurious about this until just now. After all who needs context in these halcyon days of innuendo and the drive by smear.
These ministers revealed their assets and their choices were approved by the ethics commissioner(a Harper appointee who was was known for years for her extreme leniency members of the Harper government).
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-1d1bb3f386c94acfb386468fd3abcfd0 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Go for it Kevin. You will be the best bet to replace Trudeau and his tax and spend policies.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-81c1f157b832430ba3768afd7a6b0559 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: You realize our equity markets are at an all-time high right now too right? Having created over $100B in new wealth for us during the same period right?
I also take strong issue with your point - this move will SAVE us money and create jobs - not the other way around
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-f59218af611d45dfb2fc3fb4c677da34 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: White privilege? Like when my grandparents came to Canada penniless came from Europe after World War II?
My biracial children identify as Canadians - not white, not Asian, not rural, not urban - although all those elements help make them what they are. My daughter has a good-natured time with people who ask her if she's latina (she'll speak a little Spanish to them and they'll quickly learn otherwise).
We don't need social justice activists to muck with our educational system and create fake white guilt in a society that is increasingly integrated in its diversity already. All these SJW types do is create a problem where non-exists. Instead of this negativity, how about channeling some positive energy towards helping those who need support to integrate into the communities that they move into?
Thanks to the mother and son for speaking up in this article.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-148361fa2b454083a3df1927d9dad356 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Hey Roachdale, It's your grand kids you have no thought about isn't it...?
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-708e5bc110cb48d1acfdc5c2e00ead50 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Trump is advocating for Supremacy; the Suspremacy of....AMERICANS. It is the left; the democrats, the communists like Hillary and Obama who continue to break and fracture AMERICANS into tiny little controllable groups; minorities; minions eventually; victims always. Such a sad reality for the strong conservatives in the USA. Canadians are being subjected to the exact same
Divisive tactics brought on by the liberals and socialists and communists.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-cadf30353e9948fe9555ae8f95225c53 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: The western global elites have thrown everything they have at Trump. All the hysteria about Russia hackers getting involved with the German election, French election , American election when everybody knows Obama has been spying on Merkel for years.
The McCarthyism hysteria is at a boiling point.The demigod main street media have walked themselves into a corner with a complete empty narrative and no way out.
Yes Russian are evil for simple being Russian!!!!
The Democrats are devoid of creativity, devoid of ideas, devoid of policy and completely devoid of person magnetism, They literally have nothing but to latch on to the charisma of Putin and a bit of cold war ideology, its all they got!!
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-a964766119a34f478ba0cebf428880d8 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: And what do you think about Trudeau's approval of pipelines? Such hypocrisy from the right wing. Canadians are sick to death of it. Grow up.
Trudeau is simply reiterating the statements made by none other than Stephen Harper.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-c20472c4774340049f5fb4fe3c85d4e0 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: That's so the ROC can bankroll Quebec to provide such social goodies as dirt cheap post-secondary education and daycare to their residents ... the West have to stop being so nice or they'll continue to be taken advantage of.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-3babcf0fba0245b48100b86840d15712 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: The reason why Flynn had to go was because he lost the confidence of Donald Trump, not because of his communication with the Russians (as Obama did the same thing), but because he didn't tell the truth when asked about it. I agree with his removal. But the real damage of this incident is the fact that someone in the intelligence community is leaking classified top secret information to the media. This is unacceptable and Donald Trump needs to initiate an investigation as to who these people are and their motives for committing these treasonous actions.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-32a7d586123c4734ad41c5571c6e752a |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I'm sure he knew that would be a distinct possibility when he did that. I admire someone who is willing to be a one-term governor to stand up for what he believes in, rather than to do nothing hoping to get re-elected for not having to take a stand or make a decision.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-56a375108a9f490b8a2f3609a2e59cdd |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: This article does what most articles that profess to express facts but are really opinion pieces does: It selects facts to try to bolster the opinion and make the opinion sound as if it is uncontrovertible evidence. The author mixes up "power" and "energy", global electricity production statistics and total energy consumption-related emissions - either deliberately or because he doesn't have a full grasp of the subject matter. And of course he uses the tired argument that because Canada is such a small producer of global greenhouse gas emissions that we shouln't be compelled to do something about our emissions. As the author is no doubt aware, that kind of thinking leads to global inaction on climate change, but then, that's probably what he wants. One little parting statistic: China is very committed to the Paris Climate Change Agreement and it alone represents 28% of total global greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel combustion.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-409d1cc2bdf24a13b7ef50a12cfae3b2 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: A fine column from Thomas Homer-Dixon. The anonyous trolls will say all the predictable things in response. Member of elite, our bit makes no difference, just another weather cycle, the price of David Suzuki's downtown Vancouver house, politicians on the take, what about India.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-378ab4064e4e47bb9cb28d09a585a548 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: How often is cannabis ever the main reason for a murder in this town? Give me a break. Legal cannabis will make things safer, not more dangerous.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-8e1774abdb2e4840ab8c865ed9be212e |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: And what about Mr. Nelson. Well, he's still in the hospital. Since September 16th. What does that tell you? That he was hurt very badly. And this piece of dirt gets $20,000 bail. Please add attempted murder to those charges. You hit someone in the head three times with a hammer, you're trying to kill them.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-2cbaad522bda43f7b0c33111d297e925 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Bad reporting: "... since the price of oil collapsed two years ago...". That is a completly false narrative that is not supported by facts.
The budget deficits Alaska suffers come mainly from the fact we are giving away almost $10 billion dollars of oil per year tax- free due to the blatently unconstitutional and corrupt SB-21.
If we continue to give away our oil, we WILL destroy the Alaska economy and wipe out the personal wealth of the majority of Alaskans.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-cb71f9aafc1c45bc80ac2068edd1194d |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I am one who disagrees with you.
Those in society who derive greater financial benefit from it, owe it a greater percentage of their income.
In fact, I would go further, and stratify incomes into the tens of millions (56% on those over $500k, 66% over $5M, 76% over $15M, 86% over $30M - feel free to choose your own numbers here...). This is not a new idea - top tax brackets in the US in 1945 were 94% over $200k.
As well, in the booming 50's top tax rates were 91% (in the USA).
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-d6683cf38ee74a0aaefebef7ad84c47a |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I personally admire Bill Morneau. He seems like he is genuinely trying. It is just that he, like many others who have never had to start a business or find a job or save for retirement, has no practical experience at what it is to be middle class. I know many people who make over $100k/year but without pensions. None are "rich" and all are going to be working a long time because they are still paying off mortgages in their late 40's/early 50's. Now that they are finally in a place where they are making good money, they are being told they are the problem in the country - they are rich and aren't paying enough taxes.
Meanwhile, the government paid $200k for artwork on the cover of the 2017 budget, which is the federal tax paid by someone who makes $700k/year. Get rid of wasteful practices instead of more revenue to continue wasteful practices.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-e3c5c0db7de8427b98cff72e35227f87 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Cultural appropriation is a scam. Nobody owns a culture, and all cultures are continuously changing over time from absorbing bits from other cultures or simply from internally preferences.
The whole point of the cultural appropriation dogma and rhetoric is to wallow in victimhood and to control what others can say and do.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-662caae2b65a4a0ca77f91d435cdaefd |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: A stand up guy doesn’t propose to destroy Canadian’s ability to save for retirement while using the same tax strategies to insulate his own family from taxes.
Do not try to make this out like a good guy was in the wrong place at the wrong time.
People voted for a Liberal government. Not a Leftist/Socialist one. This isn’t about fairness. This is theft. This is about equality of outcome. This is wrong and it needs to reported as wrong, not “ah shucks, such a good plan from such a good guy, it just wasn’t executed well”.
It was a terrible plan, from an incompetent government and unfortunately we haven’t heard the last of their ideas.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-09e05993e5d94d8ebdc082e8ed304ed7 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: So let me understand this correctly. Not a Canadian citizen or permanent resident but failed refugee claimant who left Canada; proceeded to areas of the world that are known to be zones associated with extremist activities; was captured by and detained by American forces; recently read about the Khadr settlement; and now wants a piece of our tax dollars in the sum of $50 million?
Even if the Canadian government told them everything about this guy, it doesn’t matter. He is conferred no rights under our constitution or our laws. He is a failed refugee claimants who engaged in activities against the US armed forces and was detained by the US government.
Sue the Americans and stay out of Canada. You can’t mooch off our government. We already told you that you were not welcome here.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-43bf259d4fc24421a06f3d4fb21168b2 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: If a Canadian person were to paint like the French impressionists, would that person be committing cultural appropriation? Would people scream it is unacceptable?
If a French person were to paint like the Canadian Group of Seven, would that person be committing cultural appropriation? Would that be unacceptable?
If eastern foreigners or indigenous people in Canada adopt western language and styles of writing and western ways, would that be cultural appropriation? Should that be unnaceptable?
When is adopting some of ways of another culture acceptable and when is it unaccptable?
What do the Metis say?
And isn't immitation the finest form of flattery?
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-3db173f330aa4bfca244602e49d518c3 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: PERS/TERS was gutted several years ago so quit scapegoating. You're only paying for those who were already in the system and no amount of layoffs is going to do much about that. Current new employees have little more than a 401(K).
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-1667f6c83e3d4f92b2ec0d5a5eb2e43d |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: No evidence that she has a chip on her shoulder other than your deeply held conviction that "those people" always do.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-078250e10710441db10a99a9ff3a263c |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: So are you disputing any of the content of the article, or just upset that it's not a Don Young fluff piece?
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-5dd0e54ccea74d1faecdb8816f0037f1 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Do as I say and not as I do, because, as a Liberal, I know better than you.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-176d6a41366c4cb4b3b44d4ed24587e0 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Horrors- the GG spoke her mind and told some truths that people need to hear. Most people seem to be ok with her trashing junk medicine and climate change denial, but react with horror when she calls out Creationism.
Well - hey! Too bad 'Christians', 'Muslims' etc etc. Come up with any evidence at all and you might have a talking point. Your bronze age mythology is a horror and slows human progress.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-e72561febd98452592279b072bb1ccda |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Good luck unringing that bell.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-9a329e439ea14634bcce771ea8d7fbe0 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Time to profile Gerald - front and centre - all his bad policy decisions over the past 14 years...
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-aa60242e080141d4923743c80377cd5d |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: The behaviour of the judge is intentionally provocative and must be dealt with publicly, not behind doors. A presumably intelligent man is acting childishly,pushing the envelope, letting all know he shares the views of a misogynist, bigot and bully. He very well knew what he was doing - we're likely to see more of this and it needs to be stopped in its tracks.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-1c0454f8c78f4d898074901fb6c5218e |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: The transcripts of this exchange need to be released... I want to hear the questions asked, the answers given, and why she reaches the conclusion she does.
No more trusting - only checking.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-93340f3fc379482bb5d9c5f637724aff |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Like most far right conservatives you have no clue what Socialism is.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-3c4c40f6754f4921bad8ba7a061e475f |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I agree that the attacks are over smoke and mirrors however I dont agree that the government are hypocrites in talking about the middle and working classes and tax fairness.
I think they are serious about the dangers of income disparity and see it s a threat as well as people feeling left out of whatever benefits accrue from trade and an improved economy..They have taken steps to address this however the opposition and press have dragged around one red herring after another to try to distract from this.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-1ea1c316231e464488ee74561c536c94 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I think that although Canadians act like sheep at times electing this group of broken promises is finally out for all to see.I mean really, Justin the trust fund kid and Marneau the bizzionaire both as 1% as you can get in this country pretending to be for the people,for the middle class is so phony even the children they pat on the head can see though this charade,where is the pail.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-f75ea24cb99e42069e211e7034d2d640 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: The USA certainly is allowed to make their own decisions regarding their own borders.... just like the rest of the world is free to decide how to spend their tourist dollars.
It is time for a world-wide ban of tourism to the USA until Trump is impeached. This insanity needs to be nipped in the bud. ENOUGH.
BOYCOTT THE USA!
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-c1e633bdd34a4d1c9aaef02ce6469453 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: They should be tried for murder. " My friend is gone."
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-69d0af4a16c6448db8c7ba33df030944 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Eliminating tax credits means raising taxes. Revenue tools are taxes. No one is better at spending other people's money than smug leftwing idealists in the Federal Liberals. Trudeau is a naive idealist who grew up with a silver spoon completely disconnected from the economic realities facing most Canadian families. The Federal Liberals ignorantly believe they are better at spending taxpayer money than the people who actually earn it, they support big government, waste, and leftwing social experiments that waste money and yield nothing in return. Sunny ways, because it's 2016, #whatwouldJustindo, good for you Canada! And the government will run exclusively on "green" energy by 2025, because wind and solar have done wonders for Ontario... good for you Toronto, you deserve each other.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-87efeafae9954d038e2d16efc83a8df2 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: You know, Nigel Southway, what you quote as facts are not facts at all, but irrational fear.
Elsewhere I posted that it did not make sense to me to condemn phobias which are, over all, a kind of fear. But I have been thinking that that post was wrong. The fear that disguises itself as fact must be dealt with, and it is worth condemning for the terrible things that it does
You are right that people are "concerned" (your first line). They are afraid that our situation is the same as Europe's, but it is not. The only place from where it is easy to cross into Canada is the U.S. It is very difficult to get to Canada and the U.S. because of geography.
There are no facts that say Islam is the world's most violent religion. Who, after all, has most of the world's largest, most powerful militaries? Christians.
The rest of what you say is just simply wrong. I doubt that you are lying. You are just imagining something inaccurately, and it is frightening you. And that has to stop.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-90dc2494e1c94f8ab32debbf8234d891 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: he;s still fixing the damage harper inflicted everywhere,,,, this could go on for our lifetimes...
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-d22ce6b07a054598a004f4782f890de3 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I am starting to think my Canadian generosity is being taken advantage of.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-dafb91700f46430981ce6d82dfaccf49 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I have been divorced for 12 years. I initiated the divorce. We weren't a good fit and my ex-wife was more interested in my "resources" and what they afforded her to do than being a contributing partner in our relationship. The divorce cost me about $40,000 and I have paid a total of $432,000 in child and spousal support during this time as she has remarried TWICE. When I initiated the split she told me she would take me for everything and continues to do so to this day. In the mean time I focused on living in my tiny house and trying to be the best dad to my kids. Both have completely pulled away from me in their teens because I have insisted on them going to school and having responsibilities. Their mother has been entirely hands off. She parties, rides her horses while I struggle to convince my kids to improve attendance at school, avoid weed, and work hard. They won't listen. It's been hell. Why would I want to go through this again?. It's been financial devastation.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-425c51156cf34006a60054c1e826a183 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Interesting, Winnipeg Warrior. Your impression is that media treats Muslim violence as individual acts and white violence as a societal problem. My impression is the reverse, that the media are more likely to treat Muslim violence as a product of Islam, and white violence as the result of mental imbalance. And many expect Muslim clerics to apologize for Muslim violence, but we don't expect the same of Christian clerics. We seem to believe what we want to believe. How do we resolve this?
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-155bb5b8fefe4121bd782703d86ed328 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Furlong did lie. Let's not forget that. At first he denied being in BC during an earlier stint in Burns Lake, then he admitted it, downplaying the commission of almost 2 years of his life and his original start in Canada. While that doesn't mean he hid something, it does bring up the matter of deception and convenient forgetfulness.
That si why he has zero claim for libel or wrongful dismissal.
So let him get on with his life, but not as a trusted public speaker or figure. His showboating style (Evermet him? Lots of self-promotion in his personality) is something he paid a price for.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-7aa012e1405e4b468a5f8e8b06fdfe67 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Actually, the income for directors of Morneau Sheppell, of which he was one, have the choice to turn their director fees into DSUs (Director Share Units). They are notional shares (options) are tied to the price of MSI, so no tax is paid upon granting. The profit on them, which can be deferred, turns everything in to capital gains. Even dividends can be turned into DSUs. If filing in Alberta, one can sell $1 million DSUs at a tax rate of less than 20.3%. lower than the rate the janitor at Timmy's pays.
Did I mention there is a clause that allows the transfer of DSUs to others? Did I mention that the Board can unilaterally vest these DSUs immediately without shareholder approval? See the MSI March 2, 2017 Information Proxy Circular
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-ce486ddc9fff48768dfbdb3121059718 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: The legislature can do their part to cut state spending, and lead by example for a change, by cutting their own bloated budgets. To you legislators who have multiple staff members with bloated salaries, be real leaders and show us how it's done. We're watching.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-e56732fd49f04b85a7df90270393a758 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Agreed. I'll never understand the notion that somehow all ideas are equal, and should be given equal treatment.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-54cb245890c24b45943f29afe6a78b56 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: In your dreams. Rest up for two more cycles.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-d8fc6a50342e451697ead14f488cf1eb |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: They didn't do this out of the goodness of their hearts.
Fact is Khadr could easily sue the GoC and win a much bigger larger sum.
What CSIS did was a crime against humanity and a violation of the Geneva convention.
Next up the Foreign Affairs staff who turned a blind eye to to Afghan detainee abuse and those within the Martin and Harper governments who deliberately covered it up
The truth will out.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-55109025623e4f5c8bb0357fcb4aac94 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: The number of pipsqueak reporters and newsreaders criticizing the man who will be President Donald Trump on January 20 is noteworthy only for the shallow, herd mentality it exposes. This piece of cheap satire will fit in neatly with the earlier hysterical pieces written prior to the new President's election by the American people.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-a9963118d52e4de5b85e05c61f208c0a |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: It doesn't bother me at all that you're out. You have no idea what the protest is all about.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-7e86792820da4489a3253154ae628a12 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Time to check the ego, Kathy, and resign. Ontarians do not like your government, your policies, your criminal corruption, and your attempts to buy us off to ignore your mistakes. We cannot afford you.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-8e9179a848774463a0d9aeedb3ffee22 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Apparently Trump bashing has gotten so bizarre that even freedom and independence must take a back seat to it. How totally bizarre!
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-622845c227294436be2cd32aa811d974 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: But remember, he said he's not breaking any rules. At the same time, small business wasn't breaking any rules either, and yet, they've been painted by the Liberals as wealthy tax cheats who avoid paying their fair share.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-f055741bbdda4856b5041bf4943c9db4 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: They are not coming to Canada illegally but are being processed at the border.
Output:
| [
"Disagree"
] | task324-2b35497c6919443a9d86f4ff52155944 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Just in case you missed it...
“there should be no preferential access, or appearance of preferential access” in exchange for political donations"
Trudeau and his Liberals cannot be trusted. He must resign.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-f1f23562dac14510befbfdb3d91cbae8 |
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: There is a rumor going around the capital that certain GOP senators don't want to solve the Alaska fiscal crisis until we have a new governor.
These three GOP house members have my support. And any GOP senator that decides to put party before the health of Alaska will earn a special spot in the list of Alaskan traitors.
I quit the GOP because of this kind of garbage. I swore I would never join the Democrats, but to inflict pain on any legislator that stands in the way of a fiscal solution for Alaska, I may be forced to change my independent status.
Output:
| [
"Agree"
] | task324-bdfdf262836f4f899f0fa91d9aabb8f5 |
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
Dataset Card for Natural Instructions (https://github.com/allenai/natural-instructions) Task: task324_jigsaw_classification_disagree
Additional Information
Citation Information
The following paper introduces the corpus in detail. If you use the corpus in published work, please cite it:
@misc{wang2022supernaturalinstructionsgeneralizationdeclarativeinstructions,
title={Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Tasks},
author={Yizhong Wang and Swaroop Mishra and Pegah Alipoormolabashi and Yeganeh Kordi and Amirreza Mirzaei and Anjana Arunkumar and Arjun Ashok and Arut Selvan Dhanasekaran and Atharva Naik and David Stap and Eshaan Pathak and Giannis Karamanolakis and Haizhi Gary Lai and Ishan Purohit and Ishani Mondal and Jacob Anderson and Kirby Kuznia and Krima Doshi and Maitreya Patel and Kuntal Kumar Pal and Mehrad Moradshahi and Mihir Parmar and Mirali Purohit and Neeraj Varshney and Phani Rohitha Kaza and Pulkit Verma and Ravsehaj Singh Puri and Rushang Karia and Shailaja Keyur Sampat and Savan Doshi and Siddhartha Mishra and Sujan Reddy and Sumanta Patro and Tanay Dixit and Xudong Shen and Chitta Baral and Yejin Choi and Noah A. Smith and Hannaneh Hajishirzi and Daniel Khashabi},
year={2022},
eprint={2204.07705},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.07705},
}
More details can also be found in the following paper:
@misc{brüelgabrielsson2024compressserveservingthousands,
title={Compress then Serve: Serving Thousands of LoRA Adapters with Little Overhead},
author={Rickard Brüel-Gabrielsson and Jiacheng Zhu and Onkar Bhardwaj and Leshem Choshen and Kristjan Greenewald and Mikhail Yurochkin and Justin Solomon},
year={2024},
eprint={2407.00066},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.DC},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.00066},
}
Contact Information
For any comments or questions, please email Rickard Brüel Gabrielsson
- Downloads last month
- 42