input
stringlengths 1.66k
2.64k
| output
listlengths 1
1
| id
stringlengths 40
40
|
|---|---|---|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Wow, so the 40 economists that just penned a letter that includes former presidents of the Canadian Economists Assoc. say the hike is a good and overdue......well they are wrong and you really mean Wynne just chose not to listen to you or hacks from the Federation of Independent Business or the discredited Fraser Institute..... got it.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-5f9c5059a3a2473cb1e4c3d626750517
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: If a judge could reasonably decide that in some cases, gender signifiers – even on a birth certificate – violate a child’s human rights, then might a judge also reasonably decide that a parent who arbitrarily imprints their extreme gender identity bias on their children's birth certificates are also violating that child's human rights?
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-4967c31d5f82471785d27cc347745280
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I'd love to have their pension too, but you can put up to $25,000 per year into an RRSP and defer the tax until you need the money. You probably know that, but I'd like to know why that isn't enough.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-589cb69ac9d64a00b53bd53733328ac6
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I never expected any less from Trudeau, Liberals are corrupt.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-89931805baa241e1a7d854735a81bd57
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: If anyone has shown themselves to be infantile, it's the media and their incessant whining over Trump.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-795ddf73986b4cc39ffe5793594da268
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Hiking in the 'stans. Yep ... way up there on my bucket list.
More to this than is being reported.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-6528a7f6d61c46eab41ace0d27dcac0f
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Bravo Charles! This is the single most cogent piece I've seen written on the entire budget debacle. Well done.
One Walker statement that especially resonated with me: "So it's about worrying about the future of Alaska, not the future of the political seats that we're in." We have legislator politicians camped out in their seats for decades, enjoying and misusing their political power. Walker may indeed get bounced in a couple years. A whole bunch of other politicians should be fired as well, including mine.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-8fd08956094d479ea33b34a0aa638d8b
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I am a physician. I feel burnt out, fatigued, stressed and vilified.
Most physicians I know, including me, would be happy to be a government employee.
Hourly wage, scheduled breaks and lunch/dinner (like nurses and everyone else in the hospital), paid vacation (we get zero), paid sick leave (3 days of unpaid)- I was really sick-in 27 years, at least time and a half for overtime (I would probably have 30-40 hours per week), an an indexed pension plan so that I knew I would be fiancially stable after 65 or so.
Currently I feel like one of those poor horses that has to pull a carriage around all day for tourists.
The system needs to change.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-caaff785d9fd43f9b5badde46d03a196
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Buh-bye, snowflake.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-c3fd762194404388a0e986720a64c2f8
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: There was an interview played this morning on CTV with Caitlin Coleman's father. The man was visibly angered that Joshua Boyle took Coleman, pregnant of all things, to this hell hole in the first place. He made strong note of how errant it was of Joshua Boyle to refuse a US flight through a US airbase on the way home.
Catlin Coleman's father is finally the refreshing counterpoint to Canadian media's spin that Joshua Boyle is some kind of hero. In fact, Boyle, previous husband of Omar Khadr's sister, was a behaving like a reckless ideologue.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-68e86a2e78ab46b3bf9994aadb27c0b7
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: No need for the TransMountain Pipe now or all that tanker traffic. Plenty of capacity with Keystone to the mid 2020's. By then, there may be no market for dirty expense Tar - why risk the cash.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-09c9ca1c58ec49abb1d58ae44acbf7c3
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: You forgot to mention many of the other tasks/events our Prime Minister has been involved with - travelling to participate with leaders at various international meetings, travelling to provinces across the country to speak with citizens, promoting Canadian efforts regarding NAFTA when speaking with US Governors...to name a few. Press in the United States doesn't hurt us right now when we are in the midst of needing to increase our profile as the NAFTA negotiations begin. The sad story is that there wasn't much interest in Harper internationally or frankly at home....he was boring and didn't accomplish nearly as much on behalf of regular Canadians as you would like to believe.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-024aac732b0e40858203951d7e4898c5
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: No time to go after billions of dollars in money laundering but they have time to go after a tax on a retail discount?
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-c7986c068c914b21aa913e85d9335116
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: 1)All small business has expenses that are incurred and much like doctors our biggest expemse is SALARIES.
2) Small business does not, I repeat does not have the ability to raise prices to account for new taxes.. The Physians claim this as a major reason for their
3)Sounds to me like a group that has been caudled and wants their special status.. Pay up boys and girls.. To say you will move to another country.... Really?.. Wow perhaps you should
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-a50c5a9d07d24057bf1a8503af06cdf4
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: This is so dumb.
Don't folks know we keep the souls at Poker Flats and the bodies at HAARP?
Any zombie apocalypse expert knows you never want the two to meet.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-aff9130000f24f54877f10a6fa5f7bea
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Sandra... here is a fact.
You make time for the things you want. If he really wanted to read to the kids he would turn off his pager.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-4dba64b70f26450f84614e7a10ea464c
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: The arts have been , are .and hopefully always will be one of the first expressions of dissent . You'll have to get used to it Mr.Trump
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-1dfea73a4b7948d39541fc8a823367c5
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Your story is my story (insert married elementary school principal). The economic carnage was the same.
Never again.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-62ba6660459d41679e619c5f691a2cf2
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: So let me get this straight. The Lord's Prayer was removed from our schools a while back. Schools are not allowed to put on a Christmas concert in December - it is now called a winter concert. However, one particular group of people, new to this country, are allowed to practice their religion within the walls of our supposedly secular school system? I don't know whether to laugh or cry.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-fe96e67169ce494d939c48c5c3a9bb3f
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Do you realize that, regardless of your point of view, Gov. Walker actually DID something? The Legislature has only itself to blame ... and I choose to blame it, and not the governor, whose hand was forced by legislators who could have / should have produced "something" in this session and the first "overtime."
Furthermore, he did something that was not politically self-serving. He may incur the wrath of voters for this and either be recalled (silly) or not re-elected. He knows that, and is willing to stand up for what he believes is a solution (or a step in that direction). How many of our legislators are willing to put principle over re-election?
I don't have to like the governor's solution to admire him for not doing what is politically expedient, but, rather, to put his reputation on the line for something he believes in.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-4868fdcaec2b4b0cb740c71b37938f3a
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I suggest you say that to the media also, he answered her question, she kept pushing, I would of just walked also. At least he answers questions unlike the full of bull PM.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-627223da92044c8aa00b21fae06a3d83
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Did it really say "system" instead of "systemic"? And, no, it wasn't more tolerant and inclusive. It was trying to avoid mentioning the major religious prejudice of the day. So you just want to serve All Canadians rather than those who are frightened? Ha. I've got your number.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-c5774e5e7ab345fd9621e3c0396eed7e
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I agree no one should be "left by the wayside". Feminism does no such thing. Wente knee jerk reaction to anything "feminist" is most often misleading.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-c41ad53661ac41058ad8f9f1fdd12185
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Well you’re wrong and here’s why:
There is no recent history of white people being enslaved. So no white person is going to be offended.
For the good professor to not realize that his remark, coming from a white person and directed to a black person, would be offensive, is evidence of privilege and racism.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-fb338205a3ed465a92ad36011bd9dcb5
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I just hate the idea of a referendum. The cost would not be worth it. Getting even 30% turnout for an issue most Canadians don't understand and don't care about would be a minor miracle. Below a threshold of at least a 50% turnout the results would be suspect. Voting would be split along party lines. Would this be fair to the people who are neutral or don't come out to vote? From one who campaigned for the "No" side in the Charlottetown Accord Referendum, please avoid a divisive referendum.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-89e8701c0df64424860f499a815654f1
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: The Canadian tourists in affected areas had plenty of warning that a hurricane was imminent. They could have left on their own before the hurricane's arrival.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-175d7d4d52a1416882b1fe9fc12984c3
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: You mean his response is the same as Obama's during the LA flooding in Aug 2016?
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-1ee977b25f184e17a12f56955347fd03
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: The real question is what has Don Young ever done for Alaskans but embarrass us?
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-b6570cac7bbe494aab73701fdaff9f39
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Stephane Dion
Michael Ignatieff
Justin Trudeau
not exactly better than O'Leary
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-569a8514c0f046cfa42c9a21b73c4ff6
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Okay, Chicken Little, certainly it doesn't sound good, but let's hear the other side of the story before drawing too many conclusions. If you're a Conservative party supporter I'll assume that this is just the normal rhetoric.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-8a8feb73b1164ff0b1819ea5b53fb509
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Does anyone talk about family class, and the potential of bringing in elderly parents, negating the attempt to lower the average population age?
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-91b3557cdbfd4520a68554c3611a31d1
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: No one is asking that Cornwallis be erased from any book. It would be great if the scope of Cornwallis' crimes were studied and published in detail. Public monuments like statutes are generally intended to honour individuals. We shouldn't be honouring Cornwallis.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-bfeab9b694814e52a7591876960370d8
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Masculinity is no more toxic than Femininity. The problem is "Progressive" Left individuals such as Denise do not understand the difference between men being Masculine and men being sexual predators. Harvey Weinstein was a sexual predator, that has nothing to do with Masculinity.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-b093216b0bb24d669f0481d0d17be527
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: It didn't seem like Trudeau was defending Morneau. It seemed more like Trudeau was miffed that someone wanted to speak to Morneau more than they wanted to speak to him.
Thin skinned? Unhappy when the spotlight is not on him?
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-75e692a1ed3a47618798ada0d162b57a
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Wrong again. This chant is great, and it should be celebrated by everybody who cares about democracy and who loves Canada. It's the voice of the people, letting the elites know that things are changing.
The political elites think they are special snowflakes who can do what they want. They have forgotten that they have duties, obligations and responsibilities to the people, not to the special interests and lobbyists.
If you want someone to blame for this chant blame Notley for breaking her promises to the voters. Blame Notley for catering to special interests instead of the people. You can condemn it all you want, like you condemned Trump, but you can't stop what's coming. The only way to stop it is to start governing for the benefit of the people instead of the special interests.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-ab7cfcb10caf423290dac3240efbae9d
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Let me get this correct, family visits Afganistan. Family comprised at the time of aCanadian man and his pregnant US wife. Backpacking into one of the most dangerous counties in the world and get kipnapped. Perhaps they thought the Afgan medical system was superior to ours so they ventured over there for the delivery of their child.
Why do people never cease to amaze me. I wonder how much they are going to sue the Canadian government for them not responding in a more aggresive nature to get them out......bloody hell.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-f6bee6e476a84f74aff9f43bcc33b18c
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I guesstimated it would take three years for the current gov't to start to go off the rails. Too many dumb promises that sounded good but were more complicated than suggested during the election.
Looks like they were over achievers in that regard.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-42d10427ed6c49b3a51aa17ad4806679
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: News flash Margaret, the parents at Timmies for the most part do in fact care that the warming climate is a serious threat to their children's future! Who appointed you to speak on our behalf?
Cue the trolls.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-4da017119f2f4a209a6e048a219977dc
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I had a 'roll my eyes' moment reading your post.
The problem with die-hard political hacks such as yourself is that you are content to use tired cliches that don't really correspond to reality.
Have you at all been paying attention to the province's labour negotiations with its various unions? I don't think they are on very good terms with most of these 'public sector unions'.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-32237785221d459e9970366da0611f7c
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: It is called the "law of unintended consequences".....and the real problem is Trump's "populist" views that sound good, are actually counter productive, and the second more important real problem is he has no clue regarding the first problem. He is shooting from the hip with sound bytes, photo ops, and rhetoric while behind the scenes already beginning to create real havoc. This and he is a low point in US leadership, in my view.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-c2466c431bb64492a682d31d6d18a002
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: People must see the hypocrisy in all this. Morneau goes around touting "tax fairness." Meanwhile his millions of capital gains are taxed at half, made even more lucrative if people start consulting his company for individual pension plans. He has a company in Alberta to lower his taxes. He has a company in France, which he "forgot" about, to avoid taxes. None of these are mentioned in his proposed tax changes. He ignores the lack of pensions or other benefits for the self-employed. He ignores the time and effort it takes to start a business while earnings early on can be minimal.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-611d0c0dc1f44bc2af13070edbe8cba0
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: There is of course legitimate concern for US border authorities regarding official travel documentation. Given the diversity of members in the Girl Guides its hardly unexpected that not all of the participants are going to have that documentation in order. Certainly the Girl Guides had members unable to go due to travel restrictions in years before Trump was elected and it seems like political grandstanding to make this decision now.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-4db8bf52ad4d4946b21d314165de6283
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Despite all the whining, the carbon tax in 2017, after rebates, will be negligible for most people. After all, gas prices at the pump went up $0.14/litre overnight in November and there were no riots. A large portion of electricity and natural gas bills are fixed costs which are not made worse by the carbon tax. The uproar over the tax is political and driven by the Postmedia owned Edmonton and Calgary papers.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-23ffcc2b79274dc5b13516150050a426
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: The headline reads "destroy jobs, save the planet". Does Wente support the opposite ?
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-4a05cb5d879a4511a4c6fa77c5c66353
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Ironic, D8o, because Mr. Wilders represents the Dutch who are intolerant.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-843bbb546e6541d7b19396b4db12da95
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I agree - start a new Coffee company. If Bobby Orr got involved, it would put these greedy little men from New York out of business. I worked in the Calgary oil patch and watched the 'American style of capitalism and business' wreck so many companies.
The model: Constant costs savings through hiring cheaper employees, screw service providers, cheap quality parts (as this article stresses). Why. Try to get the share price up for 2-3 years, where the options vest and bonuses to the executives and senior folks/ board (500 people) are huge and they move on without caring a bit about the company.
Sounds harsh, but basically how it works. A horrible model that so many companies now follow. I 'm conservative, but now understand why Bernie Sanders did so well in the USA. Corporate America is out of control and their greed will cause a social economic revolution. Think I am out to lunch - just watch!!! We need good, honest business people to take back control of our corporate world in Canada!
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-dab74f98524c4193b1f6abc51ced4f82
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: "When you start running out of ideas to change the present, you start messing with the past, history, past figures and Canadian traditions."
Unbelievable!!!
Did you even read the article? The author has ideas to change the present. The whole premise of this piece is about dealing with "present" issues.
You, and others, as he suggests, are just not listening, or do not want to listen.
He lists a few legitimate "present" concerns:
"slow implementation of recommendations made by the inquiry investigating the death of seven First Nations youth in Thunder Bay; and we’ve seen the grieving family of Barbara Kentner, the First Nations victim in a racially motivated killing, forced to flee their homes because of threats made against their children at school."
Your complete inability, or desire, to understand what he is saying suggests you come to the discussion with a mind already made up.
That is the problem.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-dc47b3a62be944c4a07aecc9cecf3edd
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: "NAFTA must include gender equality protection, Trudeau says".
And if it doesn't, what's he gonna do about it? Withdraw from NAFTA? We'll only trade with the US if they adjust all their laws to suit Justin? This silliness knows no bounds. This one ranks right up there with changing "right to work" laws in the states.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-e5d4276a72124a6a9fb2f1c01d6b08e3
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I'm shocked! Shocked, I tell you! Don Young embroiled in yet another ethics problem. Who could have seen this coming?
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-a2354008a8f84aa5b334c920030a51c0
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Perhaps these Doctors should re-examine the Hippocratic Oath. I don't recall it saying that their first duty is to how much money they can deduct from their taxes. They may also want to consider that one of the major reasons the US is now on the verge of falling apart is that the wealthy in that country refuse to pay their fair share of taxes. That has meant that the wealth redistribution necessary to maintain popular support for the system has started to fail, contributing to the rise of a quasi-fascist candidate like Donald Trump.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-079b88553eca4b1b9951ee4959a2cb89
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: More baloney from Cons! Even the most avid of Con journalists avoided laying the blame directly on the government. It has been asserted that this supposed policy to tax employee perks emanated from some bureaucrat at CRA. Best to check the political affiliation of this bureaucrat before making judgments about the intent of our political leader.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-8a9d9b42dcb14395b9e2da028682d759
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Dear Margaret,
As long as Justin wins elections, he doesn't need advice from you. Just like Trump didn't. You made wrong electoral predictions about both of them.
How about advising Trump not to act like a 5 year old with a Twitter account?
Who knows, he might actually grow up?
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-e9fd3e33aa95455c93433603875f0634
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Typical Liberal planning - scr*w the taxpayers instead of cutting costs starting with the bloated bureaucracy the Liberals are increasing.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-26b294f00fd0476bb3b553ca3f82b703
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I wouldn't count on Murkowski holding office much longer if her disloyalty continues. This is still a red state---and a state who supported Trump. If she wants to run as a democrat or independent , that's fine. But stabbing her fellow republicans in the back isn't going to be tolerated . All of Alaska is going to pay a price for her disloyalty .
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-47051d5a31b646cda59a4aa3fded675e
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: What is truly disturbing in this is that between the young people now charged, the friends they certainly told or suspected they were involved (and who knows how many other in their circles had knowledge or suspicions and said nothing as they watched the news reports of the agony of David's family, as well as the hundreds of people trying to help solve the mystery) none of these many people bothered to speak up to alleviate the suffering. The utter cold-bloodedness of it all is unthinkable.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-58f6dbde256f448b8bb8b656366905c0
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Is this what we expect from the PRIME MINISTER OF CANADA on a daily basis, a SELFIE WITH someone who has agreed with what he says... Over INTERNET .. Is this what the CANADIAN people are going to put up with for the next while?
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-5122e67c5270406da11d93dabdaeaf23
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I do not disagree Teleology, and really this should be the first article in a series of science based pieces on the subject. But too often these days we get hundreds of 'anectodal opinion' pieces that promote the only 'correct' viewpoint society should have. These feel good groupthink pieces are largely spurious, fallacious or based on little reasoning or hard statistically relevant data. Thus, when an opposing viewpoint is published that in a mere few thousand words attempts to bring rigorous, rational and data supported thinking back to the debate; I for one applaud it, even if it is not 100% perfect or complete.
I do hope Ms. Soh is not silenced and continues to write such reasoned, data based and as objective as possible, articles.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-d7350947b29d427aab3c56e85284be1f
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: The other side of that coin is that Canada would likely become an older, more xenophobic and less tolerant or diverse country. Look at Japan for what might be the best-case scenario argument for that approach; it's less than encouraging.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-e38fd00916694a8cad7352608409b481
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: and only a political chirp at this time from the cheap seats,,,no condolences, nothing but trying to sell your your political point..simply sad.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-21b29a1260d34c36be0d517c192e9022
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Heinbecker, well-known for his anti-Israel screeds, loves to demonize the Jewish State and its supporters, both Jews and Christians. A UN devotee to the useless organization, he deliberately left out the most important part of UN resolution 242, sympathizes with Hamas, and supports the creation of a new non-democratic Arab terror state.
He also 'forgot' to mention that Kerry said the new terror state should be non-militarized. If we want to return to the infamous immoral Liberal 1990s UN stances, Heinbecker's your man.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-e965e67398374ce99782e44a7a2fd48c
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: We knew Bryant as a young man and enjoyed him and his outlook on life. It hurts to know he is gone and we will always miss him and what could have been. Be kind to his memory, he was a friend, son, brother and member of our community. RIP
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-572e4fa178ed40f285f3a4a4de1bbca7
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Your family are obviously part of the Oligarchy because anyone with any non bias would support Oleary's run.
Your family and friends are most likely welfare receivers, teachers, bureaucrats, civil serpents, union organizers, etc.
Any wealth creator or private sector working person would support a swamp drainer.
He is the Trump of Canada without the psycho.
It's time to drain the muskeg
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-db59d43dd81f4d66871140a8227b0796
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Despite endless intimidation of elected senators Trump could not ensure the passage of a health "care" bill that he, doubtless, had not read. Trump's objective here, as in other legislative initiatives, is to wipe away any laws that were passed during the Obama years. It matters not whether existing laws benefit tens of millions of Americans. If these laws were passed while Obama was in power they have to go. I'm not sure whether Trump is doing this because Obama was a mixed race president. In any case, two resolute ladies and a great patriot, John McCain, have done their bit to ensure that the US remains a functioning democracy.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-f418f3ad62624f4db397c0e3bc65cfb8
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Cultural appropriation isn't about originality. It's about exploitation. It's dishonest in that it seeks to control, sanitize, and marginalize the appropriated culture.
The "Write what you know" dictum is akin to the Oracle at Delphi's statement on Socrates. Was he the smartest Greek? He thought he didn't know anything and set about to find out how little he did know.
Picasso said Art is a lie that tells the truth. Writers need to know they're lying and to be wary about whether their finished story tells the truth or just perpetuates a lie.
No one is worried about the appropriation of English culture or French culture. It's the appropriation of oppressed cultures that matters. Indigenous cultures, cultures of people of colour, marginalized peoples, and those discriminated against have all been victimized a second time by having their stories colonized by their oppressors.
It does not do a disservice to note the culture of the author. What it does do is note authority.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-072a77d0328448eeb9096f70627518f2
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: You bring up a really good point about the grocery stores. When I lived in Asia there were certain foods that I just craved, but could never get. I didn't feel as though there was some Asian privilege going on. Rather I realized it was the market. If there were enough white dudes who wanted to buy something it would have been there. But there weren't. I never thought of boohooing about it and claiming I was discriminated against. Instead, I tried new foods and enjoyed the culture that I was so lucky to get to enjoy. Now, back home, I have such fond memories and now I search out the foods at Asian markets that I ate and loved when I was there. And I introduced foods to my family members. I was appalled when a family member had never had a mango. We got some and he loved it!
This white privilege business is nonsense by social justice warriors who never lived through the hard times and want to make a mountain out of a mole hill.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-02437f2b1cab4f469dd466daf149a680
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: "Trump names China hawk to head new trade team".
And north of the border, Canada elects China shill to head country...
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-ed9cef46825c47e08019ecc7dd5bf56c
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: This is actually offensive by Trudeau.
He said "we were looking for an idiot, we found a native"
It's basically racist.
Also, there are negative connotations to Aboriginals and 'always fighting'.
It's like saying: "we were looking for a drunk idiot, we found an Irishman"
And I say this as one who is basically never offended by anything.
The PM could have just said "we were looking for a fool, we found a Conservative" - it would be fine.
There was no reason to bring 'Aboriginal' into it.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-8377059ee1d549d28081a673b0b81ecd
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: The majority of Alaskans support you Gov. Walker and your plan to finance this budget and for years to come. I wouldn't make a plan to pay my bills primarily from savings. We need a plan, your plan, that addresses necessary cuts, responsible use of the reserve, and NEW REVENUE sources. Stick to your guns and hold the legislature accountable for their dismal performance and lack of leadership. Face it our great state is going to tank if they don't wake up and support a real plan to finance this state now and in the future.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-47fb26ea18fe41ed9f9c1e4b7c2b4dcb
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: As David's Aunt I beg the community to insist on no plea deals, a judge who utilizes their position for our community's best interest and our community's safety to enforce maximum sentences on each of the 5 punks arrested. A couple of these punks were involved in a similar act of crime recently and bounced back on the street in a few months, escalated their behaviors to kidnapp and brutally murder our David. Why were their sentences a slap on the wrist? Why were they free in our community? Please I beg you do not allow any of these murderers back on our streets ever again. The Alaska State Troopers did their job and now it is up to the legal system and the Judge to do their job. #justiceforgrunwald. A message must be sent to our community that our legal system works and if you do a crime you will do the time.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-c5ebbdddd4004d9fa7afd1ab91635419
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I saw that BBC special the other day. And quite frankly, I came away more distressed after seeing it. Clearly there is intense anguish on the side of the children who suffer gender dysphoria. There is anguish from the parents who want to do the right thing but aren't really sure what the right thing is. There are the activists who clearly have an agenda (and not necessarily for the best interest of the kid) . There are medical professionals such as Dr. Zucker who, it seems, really appeared to be trying to do the right thing for the child.
My take away is that it is complicated. But based on seeing the BBC special, it seemed like the approach that Dr. Zucker and colleagues were taking to talk with the child and get to to know the child seemed to be the best approach. And, if in the end, gender transition is what is needed, then so be it. But rushing into something quickly that clearly has medical and psychological consequences should be done cautiously and thoughtful.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-a3874263eba8474d88b44d7cee039116
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Trump is loyal to no one. He is the epitome of selfish. If you think that he will help you...help the poor...help the weak...help the sick... you are completely wrong. There is no evidence to think otherwise. He has hurt and diminished America.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-f81d7b9a93b243b8b3f64485e741782d
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: The kind of Dad who is more concerned with doing the right thing than being popular. The kind of Dad who wants his son to learn respect.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-68a354f483ff484bb1b06e19a9e886f3
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: My thoughts exactly. I had almost given up on the G&M, indeed all media and their very obvious biases and agendas but upon having discovered Ms. Soh and her wonderful articles I still have hope that journalism can return to balance and unbiased and scientific reporting and less along partisan lines and pushing obviously untrue (to the silent majority anyway) narratives. Keep up the good work Ms. Soh, you have a dedicated reader in me.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-bd0bceaf5d4d4ba0a3b47010698ea0f6
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Yes, yay for Australia! Meanwhile, the Great Barrier Reef, which directly provides billions and billions of dollars every year to the economy of Australia is being destroyed by bleaching due to global warming. Way to go Australia!!
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-1bd06f1cb4754b6f802569b1d6adfab1
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Well said. The ones who turned a blind eye to Alaska's impending financial crisis over the past decade or more by doing nothing to rein in spending - the Republican Imperial Majority - will be the ones to scream the loudest. They have no courage or honor, unlike Gov. Walker.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-8ba81782eb5744aa9fef674b8ce1e871
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: He was hunted like a dog by this innocent press until the day he died.....hell the insults were still flying after. I think he did his penance. And the media were by no means innocent in all of this. Many people loved and still do love him. Get over it.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-eb02d0e2066c47ef867f9fe9c2f42933
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Well, I'm also a Canadian Forces veteran and I find the apology and compensation unfortunate but necessary. I became a soldier to enforce the Constitution and defend Canada from threats, both foreign and domestic. I was willing to die to protect our values, our way of life, and Canadian citizens. It didn't say I was only to protect the rights of Canadians I liked or who are law abiding. Fact is, our government violated the Constitution and international laws under the United Nations when they allowed a minor to be held in Guantanamo and stood idly by as he was tortured by a foreign government. Far as I'm concerned, the apology and compensation have nothing to do with Khadr, and everything to do with a failure of our Government to uphold and abide by our Constitution. Had our Government respected international law and the Constitution in the first place, we wouldn't owe Khadr a nickel. The system failed Khadr, that's a fact.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-4a306d73eb5448fda02f71f7657aaeec
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: You need to have followed this disaster from the beginning to see that this current government was not the culprit. Scheers defence of his former government's actions are indeed very weak. Under Canadian law Harper should have repatriated him much sooner and the financial damages would have been mitigated.
Finally, Trudeau is correct a Canadian is a Canadian. There is also serious doubt that Khadr was the one who threw that grenade based on the forced confession the Americans imposed on him through torture. They have been discredited for that.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-92197bb57f85473989792c98764f47fc
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I agree wholeheartedly, but just wait now for all the trolls who have fallen in love with Trump! Thanks for your article.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-d9c6884e29c6439394ca0e85225d9c89
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Exactly my sentiments. Also the kind of Dad who is responsible enough to know if he covers up an illegal activity he will also be going to jail.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-c513db0ecf6e4d14822cb5d4d251f6ab
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Maybe her mom voted twice.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-65a943b930e14245ae2582a771200008
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: “ protect the interests of farmers , fisherman and female entrepreneurs”
female entrepreneurs.?.. seriously ?
So I’m a “ male entrepreneur”. What am I to think?
Please tell me thats a quote out of context.
Time to move assets offshore.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-49d013f9350041a3a191b0863f0c0e1d
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Good points, why did the Globe ignore the latest example of Liberal excess, $212 K paid to an advertising firm for artwork on a budget cover. Trudeau is wasting $30 billion a year on higher government expenses and he's attacking small businesses in a cynical political ploy that would bring in $250 million. Trudeau's original tax the rich/cut middle class taxes resulted in a $1.8 billion hole in the treasury so similar results could be expected from the new plan. Meanwhile Trudeau dithers while Canada's oil and gas sectors are under assault by foreign-backed career activist parasites all the while Quebec's CO2 emitters get government subsidies (Bombardier and Quebec's new concrete plant with direct ties to Bombardier family). There are 40,000 illegal migrants in Canada that wait an average 16 months for a hearing - the welfare alone costs taxpayers $300 million/year and Trudeau does nothing, just like the Liberals do nothing about the growing industry of birth tourism for passports...
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-a755c0b229ca44beb57dd4f032ffc117
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: It is rare that a Canadian politician is so tone-deaf to the habits of the surrounding population.
Trump's message must come to Canada?
Hello?
Trump says he wants to obstruct access to abortion by overturning Roe versus Wade, he says he wants to make sure that restrictions are avoided that would inhibit the owning of handguns and assault rifles by city dwellers, and he says he wants to ensure people do not get access to single payer health care.
Um, sure, go ahead and run on that message in a Canadian election. Hope you enjoy being in the wilderness...
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-40e930fa323c437eb6dd2995383baead
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Yes, but not in this case.
Khadr deserves compensation.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-f2e8f5432f164f6ab9840a551b5d8500
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Canada's CO2 contributions are significant, especially on a per capita basis. Don't forget that we should really be factoring in emissions being exported to foreign countries like China through proposals like Kinder Morgan.
Donald Trump or no Donald Trump, the world is already well underway to a transition to an economy based on renewable energy. In the US much of the work is being done at the state level, and carbon pricing is already common in many other countries, particularly across Europe.
The challenges in Ontario have gone from poor implementation(from poor leadership) and restrictions faced through trade law. The actual big picture was the right one. A few Green MPP's would have helped.
The problem with Trudeau's plan is the proposed carbon tax(for provinces without carbon pricing) is too low, and you can't be serious about reducing emissions while simultaneously building pipelines. He's trying to please everyone at the same time. This makes for ineffective climate policy.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-11900774c7464d22a7c1a89d099a15fe
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I was raised a Christian and I don't understand the outrage at all. Forcing ALL children to repeat the Lord's Prayer, no matter what their religion, is clearly not going to work. However, allowing students to voluntarily gather in an unused classroom to discuss their religion is not unreasonable.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-f027a098136041e2b971a64f7aa23fe3
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Fake news. Fake editorial.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-af9b6b1afb674e59be5ffcf971a6d2b5
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Trust me on this Ambrose. Anyone trudging across a field and jumping a ditch to enter Canada is not entering the country legally.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-0dc4cf1698c0439da5e4bd5d38530aca
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: People should also google the Cologne incident of New Year's Eve 2015/16, in which gangs sexually accosted women in public, with varying degrees of severity. Because the assailants were immigrants, the police and media both covered up the incident for several days.
Not good; and the look-the-other-way attitude of the elites does nothing to help the cause of the honest, forthright immigrants who integrate into their new society and eventually become part of its bedrock.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-c04a547ad6684a439203910041fba926
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: "Hours after B.C. announced its tax on foreign buyers this past summer, prominent developers e-mailed Premier Christy Clark and her government saying the policy amounted to a betrayal of Metro Vancouver’s international citizens".
That's funny, for so many years it has been the developers and other real estate industrialists who have been telling us over and over again that, no no no, it is not foreign money that is skyrocketing the house prices in Vancouver, no no no, it is domestic demand from local workers and believe us, any loudmouth who claims the buying is from overseas money from international citizens, well, those loudmouths are a bunch of racist, hateful, bigoted, xenophobic, delusional propagandists.
My, oh my, how plainly the deceit reveals itself, when one goes back and re-reads the first sentence of the article, about the subsequent e-mails of those real estate shills angrily responding to the new tax...
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-6c519738e7fc40ecbca8c144965ecbae
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Trump's lack of preparation, showed through loud and clear!
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-2c57e4000a5944beb00a7df46f5c3f33
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: I've attempted to try and understand why this commission is necessary. My main source of information is the CBC because, they seem to have gone all in with respect to the indigenous narrative this year.
So, apparently the reason some commissioners quit and why indigenous peoples are dismayed are because the commissioners should have been victims as well. I'm reducing a rather complex issue but it appears the main focus of this inquiry is to let the victims be heard. By themselves.
I think we're going in circles here. And time and money will be spent with no satisfactory result. Again.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-5fc638e9eedc4293bb51b394348ffd2d
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: How will we ever survive without this sort of leadership from Sen. Lesil McGuire (R-Baden Baden)?
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-0343d30537b6401f86e866a456a8bd56
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Yeah? Funny how no one asked me for I.D. when I walked onto the subway with a scarf over my face last winter.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-b773668053b04aeba79b133e7f5037a7
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: "The Globe and Mail has learned that wealthy Chinese businessman Zhang Bin who, with a partner, donated $1-million to the Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation and the University of Montreal Faculty of Law weeks after the fundraiser, also attended the event. Mr. Zhang is a political adviser to the Chinese government in Beijing and a senior apparatchik in the network of Chinese state promotional activities around the world."
***
And I thought the Government of Ontario under Kathleen Wynne set the standard for corrupt political behaviour in selling political influence for a price. Trudeau lowers the standard even further showing the federal government can be bought off by a foreign country.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-8a17bd685bf74c5191ab0cb3c844a8a8
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: No, Munoz, you are most certainly wrong. Very wrong. The "media storm" is NOT perpetuating the hurt of those victims. What you did hurt them. And all other victims of sexual abuse. The message you sent to those victims was that they were not worth protecting, that you support the predators over them. You sent a powerful message to other predators too. You implied what they do is okay with you. You took measures to show support for them. Under the law. What you did was to make Alaska a predator friendly state. The rights of those suffering from child sexual abuse are not negotiable. Ever.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-f4a7976f9893438d9921b664e31cb891
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: And let's not forget the inability to make real budget cuts, untouchable gov't. employee subsidies, rolling over to the lobbyists from ALL directions, ad naseum. Until their actions reflect the reality the private sector sees daily, pox on all of them.
Output:
|
[
"Agree"
] |
task324-45514a68faad43debbb963afcef2affe
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: Hateful Conservative bigots can't help exposing themselves.
It's an ugly sight.
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-8a26f1f2a54a4effa9c64d538d4e67a5
|
Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Output: Disagree
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Comment: So, was there no other evidence? What about the victim statement? There was apparently enough to keep this person locked up awaiting trial for rape. What happened to the evidence that put him in jail? It did not just go away because the victim died? Surely we can do better in terms of both the memory of the victim as well as other potential victims.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Comment: Kind of like the Climate Change believers.
Output: Agree
Negative Example 2 -
Input: Comment: Liberals too. If you support this government dogmatically, without looking at what they are doing, and I mean really looking hard, you're not a responsible citizen.
Output: Disagree
Now complete the following example -
Input: Comment: only an idiot votes for a party that will destroy the economy, raise taxes and indoctrinate society with all the bs crap like out of control immigration thus holding your nose and voting conservative in the last fed election was better, now we are stuck with the worst
Output:
|
[
"Disagree"
] |
task324-edf990dba1fe49e78cc10432fa98462a
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.