text
stringlengths 0
1.03k
|
---|
Q8. How do I handle a case if it is not obvious whether the precipitating event or
|
exposure occurred in the work environment or occurred away from work?
|
A8. You must evaluate the employee’s work duties and environment to decide
|
whether it is more likely than not that one or more events or exposures in the
|
work environment either caused or contributed to the resulting condition or
|
significantly aggravated a preexisting condition. The evaluation might include
|
consultation with an ergonomics expert as well as a PLHCP. A review of the job
|
description alone is not sufficient without reviewing all of the employee’s
|
collateral duties.
|
Q9. How do I know if an event or exposure in the work environment
|
“significantly aggravated” a preexisting injury or illness?
|
A9. A preexisting injury or illness has been significantly aggravated, for purposes of
|
FRA injury and illness recordkeeping, when:
|
With respect to any person:
|
(1) Death, provided that the preexisting injury or illness would likely not have
|
resulted in death but for the occupational event or exposure.
|
(2) Loss of consciousness, provided that the preexisting injury or illness would
|
likely not have resulted in loss of consciousness but for the occupational event
|
or exposure.
|
(3) Medical treatment in a case where no medical treatment was needed for the
|
injury or illness before the workplace event or exposure, or a change in
|
medical treatment was necessitated by the workplace event or exposure.
|
With respect to a railroad employee:
|
(1) One or more days away from work, days of restricted work, or days of job
|
transfer that otherwise would not have occurred but for the occupational event
|
or exposure.
|
FRA Guide for Preparing Accident/Incident Reports
|
61
|
F 6180.55a
|
Q10. Which injuries and illnesses are considered preexisting conditions?
|
A10. An injury or illness is a preexisting condition if it resulted solely from a nonwork-related event or exposure that occurred outside the work environment, e.g.,
|
diabetes.
|
Q11. An employee-on-duty was injured at work and received medical treatment.
|
The employee was also tested for alcohol and drugs. The test was positive for
|
alcohol. The employee admitted that he had been previously treated for
|
alcohol abuse. An investigation determined that this event or exposure
|
would not have occurred except for the alcohol impairment. Since the
|
employee already had an existing problem with alcohol abuse, would this
|
injury meet the reporting exception that the injury or illness involves signs or
|
symptoms that manifest themselves at work but result solely from a nonwork-related event or exposure that occurs outside the work environment?
|
A11. The positive drug/alcohol history is not a qualifying reporting exception. There
|
are some medical conditions, such as epilepsy, that cannot be controlled by the
|
employee. The Americans with Disabilities Act, Public Law 101-336, prohibits
|
discrimination on the basis of epilepsy in employment. That is why OSHA has
|
excluded injuries occurring as a result of epilepsy from injury reporting with the
|
revised regulation, if the workplace environment did not trigger the epileptic
|
seizure. This exception allows the employer to exclude cases where a loss of
|
consciousness is due solely to a personal health condition, such as epilepsy,
|
diabetes, or narcolepsy.
|
This concept cannot be extended to alcohol dependency or the use of legal or
|
illegal drugs. Impairment by drugs or alcohol is a serious problem in the
|
workplace; however, it is not classified as a preexisting condition for purposes of
|
reporting injuries. The employer is expected to keep the workplace drug-free and
|
to report all injuries that meet FRA’s reporting criteria, including those that are
|
associated with a positive drug/alcohol test result.
|
Q12. How do I decide whether an injury or illness is work-related if the employee
|
is on travel status at the time the injury or illness occurs?
|
A12. Injuries and illnesses that occur while an employee is on travel status are workrelated if, at the time of the injury or illness, the employee was engaged in work
|
activities “in the interest of the employer.” Examples of such activities include
|
travel to and from customer contacts, conducting job tasks, and entertaining or
|
being entertained to transact, discuss, or promote business (work-related
|
FRA Guide for Preparing Accident/Incident Reports
|
62
|
F 6180.55a
|
entertainment includes only entertainment activities being engaged in at the
|
direction of the employer).
|
Injuries or illnesses that occur when the employee is on travel status should be
|
evaluated as follows:
|
(1) An employee checks into a hotel or motel for 1 or more days. When a
|
traveling employee checks into a hotel, motel, or other temporary residence,
|
he or she establishes a “home away from home.” You must evaluate the
|
employee’s activities after he or she checks into the hotel, motel, or other
|
temporary residence for their work-relatedness in the same manner as you
|
evaluate the activities of a non-traveling employee. When the employee
|
checks into the temporary residence, he or she is considered to have left the
|
work environment. When the employee begins work each day, he or she reenters the work environment. If the employee has established a “home away
|
from home” and is reporting to a fixed worksite each day, you also do not
|
consider injuries or illnesses work-related if they occur while the employee is
|
commuting between the temporary residence and the job location.
|
Note: An employee in deadhead transportation is considered an
|
“employee on duty” regardless of the mode of transportation.
|
Deadhead transportation occurs when an employee is traveling at
|
the direction or authorization of the carrier to or from an
|
assignment, or the employee is involved with a means of
|
conveyance furnished by the carrier or compensated by the carrier.
|
-
|
Exception: If an employee is housed by the carrier in a facility such as a
|
motel, and part of the service provided by the motel is the
|
transportation of the employee to and from the worksite, any
|
reportable injury to the employee during such transit is to be
|
reported as that to a Railroad Employee Not On Duty (Class B). If
|
the employee had decided upon other means of transportation that
|
had not been authorized or provided, such as a ride from a friend,
|
and for which he would not have been compensated by the
|
railroad, the injury is not considered work-related.
|
(2) An employee takes a detour for personal reasons. Injuries or illnesses are not
|
considered work-related if they occur while the employee is on a personal
|
detour from a reasonably direct route of travel (e.g., has taken a side trip for
|
personal reasons).
|
Q13. This question involves the following sequence of events: Employee A drives
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.