Datasets:

SouthernCrossAI
/

Arxiv

Dataset card Data Studio Files Files and versions Community

Split (1)

train · 132k rows

Filename stringlengths 22 64	Paragraph stringlengths 8 5.57k
Processed_QB4AIRA:_A_Question_Bank_for_AI_Risk_Assessment.txt	Categories: Each principle can be further divided into multiple categories, each representing a specific aspect of the principle. Each Category is exclusively associated with one principle. The categories act as common risk themes that are clear, specific, and relevant to the AI ethics principle they represent. Additionally, a category may contain one or more Sub-Categories, providing even more granularity and specificity to the questions and facilitating a better understanding of the different dimensions of each category.
Processed_QB4AIRA:_A_Question_Bank_for_AI_Risk_Assessment.txt	Risk question: This component consists of a set of questions associated with each category (examples in Table 1). These questions are to identify potential risks during AI system development, ensuring comprehensive scrutiny and resolution of all potential risks.
Processed_The_First_VLBI_Detection_of_a_Spiral_DRAGN_Core.txt	ABSTRACT We present the ﬁrst observation of 0313−192, the archetypal spiral DRAGN, at VLBI resolutions. Spiral DRAGNs are Double Radio Sources Associated with Galactic Nuclei (DRAGNs) that are hosted by spiral galaxies. 0313−192 is an edge-on spiral galaxy that appears to host a 360 kpc double-lobed radio source. The core of this galaxy is clearly detected at L, S, and X-bands using the VLBA, signifying an ongoing active nucleus in the galaxy. This rules out the possibility that the spiral DRAGN is merely a chance alignment. The radio core has L1.4 GHz ∼ 3.0 × 1023 W Hz−1. Radio components are detected to the South-West of the core, but there are no detections of a counterjet. Assuming a symmetric, relativistic jet, we estimate an upper limit to the inclination angle of θ (cid:46) 72 degrees. The VLBI-detected radio jet components are extremely well-aligned with the larger-scale radio source suggesting little to no jet disruption or interaction with the ISM of the host galaxy.
Processed_The_First_VLBI_Detection_of_a_Spiral_DRAGN_Core.txt	The archetypal Spiral DRAGN 0313−192 (WISE J031552.09-190644.2, z = 0.067) was ﬁrst reported by Led- low, Owen, & Keel (1998); Ledlow et al. (2001). Follow-up observations by Keel et al. (2006) with the Hubble Space Telescope suggest the host galaxy to be an edge-on spiral galaxy, likely Hubble type Sb. This is the ﬁrst instance of a spiral galaxy hosting a large-scale double-lobed radio source. Some Seyfert galaxies are hosted by spiral galaxies, how- ever, the radio structures associated with Seyfert galaxies never exceed the scale-height of the host galaxy. All exam- ples of spiral DRAGNs to-date host DRAGNs that are at least an order of magnitude larger in physical size than the host galaxy (e.g. Mao et al. 2015; Ledlow et al. 2001; Mulc- ahy et al. 2016).
Processed_The_First_VLBI_Detection_of_a_Spiral_DRAGN_Core.txt	ber of spiral DRAGNs reported in the literature (e.g Hota et al. 2011; Bagchi et al. 2014; Mao et al. 2015; Singh et al. 2015; Mulcahy et al. 2016). Mao et al. (2015) performed a systematic search for these enigmatic sources by cross- matching an optically selected sample of spiral galaxies from Galaxy Zoo (Lintott et al. 2008) with extended radio sources from FIRST and NVSS (Becker, White, & Helfand 1995; Condon et al. 1998) and found only one. The small number of discovered spiral DRAGNs in the Universe suggests that these sources are very rare. Understanding spiral DRAGNs may reveal insights in galaxy formation.
Processed_The_First_VLBI_Detection_of_a_Spiral_DRAGN_Core.txt	The AGN shows no signs of variability, the Parkes PMN survey in 1994 found a ﬂux density of 87±11 mJy at 4.8 GHz (Griﬃth et al. 1994), while a ﬂux density of 99 ± 5 mJy was measured at 5 GHz as part of the AT20G survey in 2010 (Murphy et al. 2010).
Processed_The_First_VLBI_Detection_of_a_Spiral_DRAGN_Core.txt	Keel et al. (2006) suggest that the DRAGN associated with the spiral galaxy 0313−192 may be due to the combi- nation of a number of factors. Firstly, the bulge of the spiral galaxy is overluminous, suggesting that the central black hole is unusually massive thus the associated radio jets may be able to travel faster than, for example, in Seyfert galaxies. Moreover, the radio lobes are almost exactly perpendicular to the disc of the host galaxy in the plane of the sky. The combination of powerful fast radio jets with less interstel- lar medium for them to burrow through may allow for radio lobes to develop. Finally, the spiral galaxy appears to have a warped stellar disc, which is evidence for a minor merger in the galaxy’s past. Given that a merger is currently predicted to be necessary for the formation of DRAGNs, understand- ing whether a minor merger occurred in the history of this galaxy is vital for constraining formation models of galaxies and DRAGNs.
Processed_The_First_VLBI_Detection_of_a_Spiral_DRAGN_Core.txt	Interestingly, all of the other spiral DRAGNs detected to date also appear to have unusually massive bulges, and reside in overdense environments.
Processed_The_First_VLBI_Detection_of_a_Spiral_DRAGN_Core.txt	The rarity of spiral DRAGNs provides an unprece- dented opportunity to challenge the standard galaxy for- mation model. However, the veracity of these sources must ﬁrst be conﬁrmed. Shaver et al. (1983) presented the ﬁrst putative spiral DRAGN in the literature. With higher res- olution optical data, they determined that the large-scale DRAGN seemingly associated with the host spiral galaxy was in fact a chance-alignment and actually associated with a background elliptical galaxy. In order to conﬁrm the as- sociation of the DRAGN with the spiral galaxy 0313−192 we observed the source using VLBI. VLBI observations of 0313−192 enable us to accurately locate the core of the ra- dio source so we can conﬁrm that it is coincident with the centre of the optical galaxy, rather being a chance superpo- sition. Furthermore, a VLBI detection would conﬁrm that the central engine is active.
Processed_The_First_VLBI_Detection_of_a_Spiral_DRAGN_Core.txt	Table 1. Observation Summary. ν denotes the central frequency in MHz. V293A was observed with the LBA, the remaining ob- servations were taken with the VLBA. The VLBA S-band ob- servations are limited to 200 MHz usable bandwidth due to RFI tuning ﬁlters.
Processed_Charm_and_strange_hadron_spectra_from_overlap_ferm.txt	c(cid:13) Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence.
Processed_Charm_and_strange_hadron_spectra_from_overlap_ferm.txt	During the last few years MILC lattice collaboration has generated [1] a large set of con- ﬁgurations with the one-loop, tadpole improved Symanzik gauge action and the highly improved staggered quark (HISQ) fermion action [2]. Four ﬂavours of dynamical sea quarks: degenerate up and down, strange, and charm, were included in these conﬁgurations. Taste violations in the HISQ action were found to be small [2]. On the other hand, overlap fermion action [3] has exact chiral symmetry [3, 4] on the lattice and is automatically O(a) improved. It has also many desirable features, such as the adaptation of multi mass algorithms [5]. However, using overlap action for the dynamical quarks is still prohibitively costly, except with ﬁxed topology [6]. In this work we have adopted a mixed action formalism where we used overlap valence quarks on the HISQ gauge conﬁgurations generated by MILC collaboration [1]. By adopting such a mixed action approach, one can get advantage of the chiral symmetry and low quark mass limit of overlap fermions, and the advantage of having a large set of conﬁgurations with small discretization errors as well as small taste breaking effects. One also gets the advantage of simulating both light, strange as well as heavy fermions on the same lattice formalism with chiral fermions having no O(a) errors. Of course we will have to encounter the usual issues related to mixed action and partial quenching [14]. Similar approach has been taken by the c QCD collaboration, who used overlap valence quarks on 2+1 ﬂavours dynamical domain wall gauge conﬁgurations [7].
Processed_Charm_and_strange_hadron_spectra_from_overlap_ferm.txt	In this work, by using above mentioned mixed action approach, we report our preliminary results on charm and strange hadron spectra as well as leptonic decay constants for Ds and D∗ s mesons.
Processed_Charm_and_strange_hadron_spectra_from_overlap_ferm.txt	We used two sets of dynamical 2+1+1 ﬂavours HISQ lattice ensembles, generated by the MILC collaboration : a set of 323 × 96 lattices with lattice spacing a = 0.09 fm, and a set of 483 × 144 lattices with a = 0.06 fm. The details of these conﬁgurations are summarized in Ref. [1]. The results reported here were obtained from 100 conﬁgurations on the coarser lattice, and 35 conﬁgurations on the ﬁner lattice. Here we did not address the uncertainties in the determination of lattice spacings which we will address in subsequent works.
Processed_Charm_and_strange_hadron_spectra_from_overlap_ferm.txt	For valence quarks we used overlap action [3]. For the numerical implementation of massive overlap fermions the methods used by the c QCD collaboration [8] were followed. To evaluate the sign function, the Zolotarev approximation is used, and the low Wilson eigenmodes are projected out by Arnoldi method. We used 350 and 160 Wilson eigenmodes for the coarser and the ﬁner lattices respectively. The constraint here came from the size of the memory of the machine. Using multimass CG algorithm we were able to input a range of quark masses covering from light, strange to heavy quarks. It is worthwhile to mention that one should not use the same precision for the evaluation of light and heavy quark propagators. While light quark and strange quark propagators needs relatively lower precision, for heavy quark propagators which decay rapidly, having higher precision in the inversion is absolutely necessary. Otherwise, one will get ﬂat hadron correlators at the middle of the lattice. However, for using different precisions in the multimass we found that it is not necessary to reload the eigenmodes repeatedly, which increases the total inversion time. We used periodic boundary condition in the spatial and antiperiodic in the temporal directions.
Processed_Charm_and_strange_hadron_spectra_from_overlap_ferm.txt	Gauge conﬁgurations were ﬁrst ﬁxed to coulomb gauge and then HYP smeared (one HYP). Using both point and wall sources we calculated various point-point, wall-point as well as wall-wall correlators.
Processed_Charm_and_strange_hadron_spectra_from_overlap_ferm.txt	Since ma is not very small, we need to be careful about discretization errors. Overlap action does not have O(ma) errors. In order to estimate the size of discretization errors coming from higher orders of ma, we look at the energy-momentum dispersion relation of the 1S charmonia. We calculated the mesons at various external momenta p2 = (2p /L)2n2, with n ≤ 2. We used both point source and a momentum-induced wall source for the ﬁnite momenta mesons. For the wall source at ﬁnite momenta, we put a suitable phase factor in the wall so as to project to the suitable momentum. While this requires a separate inversion for each momenta, that is more than compensated by the improvement in the signal, as shown in Fig. 1. In both ﬁgures we show both point source and wall source results for the coarser lattice. Note that the wall source results are from 8 conﬁgurations, but the statistical error is already comparable to that from 100 conﬁgurations with the point source.
Processed_Charm_and_strange_hadron_spectra_from_overlap_ferm.txt	In the left panel of Fig. 1, we show E(p) for various momenta for the pseudoscalar meson on our coarser lattices. Also shown are the continuum dispersion relation, E 2 = m2 + p2, and the lattice dispersion relation for the standard scalar action with O(ma)2 error, sinh2(E(p)a/2) = (sinh2(ma/2))2 + sin2(pa/2). While substantial deviation from the continuum dispersion relation is seen, the lattice scalar dispersion relation seems to explain the data quite well. For a more quantitative analysis, we follow the standard practice of introducing an effective “speed-of-light” c through E 2(p) = m2 + p2c2. The value of c obtained using this relation and E(p) at various p are shown in the right panel of Fig. 1. As the ﬁgure shows, we get c2 ∼ 0.75 on our coarser lattices, and c2 ∼ 0.89 on the ﬁner lattices. Using quenched overlap fermions, on an even coarser lattice, Ref. [10] found c2 ∼ 1 for the charm. However, on our dynamical lattices, we obtained c2 values similar to that obtained in the literature with clover action, indicating a similar size of cutoff in the overlap action as that in the clover. The c2 values are well-approximated by the estimate ma/ sinh(ma), suggested by the lattice scalar action.
Processed_Charm_and_strange_hadron_spectra_from_overlap_ferm.txt	We utilized both point and wall sources to generate a large set of quark propagators. Us- ing those we calculated various hadron correlators and extracted light, strange and charm hadron masses. The pseudoscalar meson masses ranged between 240 − 3582 MeV for the coarser lattices and between 420 − 5275 MeV for the ﬁner lattices. In Fig. 2 we plot the pseudoscalar meson masses over a range of quark masses.
Processed_Charm_and_strange_hadron_spectra_from_overlap_ferm.txt	Figure 1: (Left) Energy-momentum dispersion relation for the h c on the lattices with a = 0.09 fm. Also shown are the continuum relativistic dispersion relation (solid line), and the lattice dispersion relation (Right) c2 = (E 2(p) − E 2(p = 0))/p2 calculated for h c at (dashed line) for the standard scalar action. various values of p, on lattices with a = 0.09 and 0.06 fm. Solid horizontal lines represent the estimate ma/ sinh(ma), suggested by the lattice scalar action.
Processed_Charm_and_strange_hadron_spectra_from_overlap_ferm.txt	Figure 2: Pseudoscalar meson masses over a range of light to heavy quark masses. Left ﬁgure is for m2 function of quark mass ma, and the right ﬁgure is for mp a vs ma in physical unit.
Processed_Charm_and_strange_hadron_spectra_from_overlap_ferm.txt	The hyperﬁne splitting in 1S charmonia is one of the most well studied physical quantities in lattice charmonium calculations over the year, and until very recently [11] lattice results were found to be smaller than the experimental value (∼ 116 MeV). This underestimation was mainly due to the discretization error associated with the charm quark action and the quenched approxi- mation. In our study we also calculated this splitting. In Fig. 3, we showed the effective splittings between vector and pseudoscalar correlators (jackknifed) at the tuned charm mass for wall-point correlators. Horizontal lines shown are the ﬁt results obtained by ﬁtting only these correlators. Our ﬁnal estimated results, by simultaneously ﬁtting the wall-point and point-point correlators, for this hyperﬁne splitting are 114+3 −3 MeV corresponding to lattices with spacings a = 0.09 and 0.06 fm respectively.
Processed_Charm_and_strange_hadron_spectra_from_overlap_ferm.txt	Figure 3: Effective hyperﬁne splitting in 1S charmonia for wall-point correlators for lattices with spacing 0.09 (left) and 0.06 fm (right). Horizontal lines show the ﬁt results obtained by ﬁtting only these correlators.
Processed_Charm_and_strange_hadron_spectra_from_overlap_ferm.txt	Along with pseudoscalar and vector mesons we also calculated the ground state spectra of tensor, axial and scalar charmonia. Besides charmonia we also calculated the strange-charm Ds mesons. In Fig. 4(a) we showed splittings between these various mesons at two lattice spacings. It is to be noted that the splitting of Ds − h c/2, which has smaller lattice spacing error [12], obtained is consistent with its experimental value.
Processed_Charm_and_strange_hadron_spectra_from_overlap_ferm.txt	Figure 4: (a) Meson mass splitting for charmonia and strange-charm mesons at two lattice spacings. Ex- c and W perimental values are shown in the left side. (b) W cc baryon masses. Also shown are other lattice determinations, and the experimental values, where available.
Processed_Charm_and_strange_hadron_spectra_from_overlap_ferm.txt	which requires calculation of D mix [15], the low energy constant representing O(a2) discretization dependence. In future, utilizing MAPQc PT we will extrapolate these masses to the physical limit. We also calculated the experimentally unknown triply charmed baryon W ccc, and a better way to −10 MeV and quote its mass is through the splitting of mW 120(10) MeV, for 0.09 fm and 0.06 fm lattices respectively.
Processed_Charm_and_strange_hadron_spectra_from_overlap_ferm.txt	Figure 5: Ground state spectra for charmed baryons at various pion masses for 323 × 96, a = 0.09 f m lattice.
Processed_Charm_and_strange_hadron_spectra_from_overlap_ferm.txt	l where e m correlator, fD∗ from hA4(t) P(0)i and hP(t) P(0)i correlators, where P = ZP ¯sg 5c is the pseudoscalar current.
Processed_Charm_and_strange_hadron_spectra_from_overlap_ferm.txt	since fDs has been calculated very precisely in the literature. Our preliminary results for R( fD∗ 1.15(10) on the lattices with a = 0.09 f m. The mixed action effects will be smaller for heavy-light mesons, and in the ratio its effects will be minimal.
Processed_Charm_and_strange_hadron_spectra_from_overlap_ferm.txt	lence quarks generated on the background of dynamical 2+1+1 ﬂavours HISQ conﬁgurations. The results, in particular the hyperﬁne splitting of 1S charmonia, are encouraging and suggest that the overlap valence on 2+1+1 ﬂavor HISQ conﬁgurations is a promising approach to do lattice QCD simulation with light, strange and charm quark together in the same lattice formulation. However, at these lattice spacings, the discretization errors of the overlap action for the charm, as evident from the dispersion relation, are not negligible, and are similar in size to those of the clover action. This is a continuing study and we expect to be able to do suitable chiral and continuum extrap- olations, to make experimentally relevant predictions for various charmed baryons. The splitting ccc − 3 (mW ccc was found to be 110+20 −10 MeV and 120(10) MeV, on our lattices with a = 0.09 and 0.06 fm respectively. We are also studying heavy-light decay constants. Necessary renormalization constants will be calculated in future. Our preliminary results for fD∗ s / fDs (for which the renormalization constants approximately cancel) is 1.15(10), from our coarser lattice.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	Unobserved confounding is the main obstacle to causal effect estimation from observational data. Instrumental variables (IVs) are widely used for causal effect estimation when there exist latent con- founders. With the standard IV method, when a given IV is valid, unbiased estimation can be ob- tained, but the validity requirement on a standard IV is strict and untestable. Conditional IVs have been proposed to relax the requirement of standard IVs by conditioning on a set of observed variables (known as a conditioning set for a conditional IV). However, the criterion for finding a conditioning set for a conditional IV needs a directed acyclic graph (DAG) representing the causal relationships of both observed and unobserved variables. This makes it challenging to discover a conditioning set directly from data. In this paper, by leveraging maximal ancestral graphs (MAGs) for causal infer- ence with latent variables, we study the graphical properties of ancestral IVs, a type of conditional IVs using MAGs, and develop the theory to support data-driven discovery of the conditioning set for a given ancestral IV in data under the pretreatment variable assumption. Based on the theory, we de- velop an algorithm for unbiased causal effect esti- mation with a given ancestral IV and observational data. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real- world datasets demonstrate the performance of the algorithm in comparison with existing IV methods.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	the unconfoundedness assumption becomes unreliable. In this case, the instrumental variable (IV) approach [Card, 1993; Martens et al., ] is considered a powerful way to achieve un- biased causal effect estimation. The IV approach leverages an IV (denoted as S), a variable known to be a cause of the treatment W , controlling treatment assignment, to deal with unobserved confounding. Given a valid IV, an unbiased es- timate of the total causal effect of W on outcome Y can be obtained based on the estimated causal effect of S on W and the estimated causal effect of S on Y .
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	The requirements for a standard IV are very strong and it is impossible to find a standard IV in many applications. For a variable S to be a valid standard IV, it must be a cause of W and satisfy the exclusion restriction (i.e. the causal effect of S on Y must be only through W ) and be exogenous (i.e. S does not share common causes with Y ) [Martens et al., ; Imbens, 2014]. These conditions are strict and can only be justified by domain knowledge. In particular, the exogeneity implies that S must be a factor “external” to the system un- der consideration and connects to the system only through the treatment W , which is impossible to validate in practice.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	A conditional IV relaxes the requirements of a standard IV significantly and it is more likely to exist in an application than a standard IV [Pearl, 2009; Brito and Pearl, 2002]. With the concept of a conditional IV, an “internal” variable S can be a valid IV when conditioning on a set of observed vari- ables Z. In this case, S is known as a conditional IV which is instrumentalized by Z, and the key to the success of the conditional IV method (in obtaining unbiased causal effect estimation) is to find a proper conditioning set Z for a given conditional IV.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	still requires a DAG containing all the observed and unob- served variables. Therefore, the majority of existing methods for finding a conditioning set of a conditional IV need a causal graph which may not be known in many applications.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	There are some works which use the conditional IV with- out complete causal knowledge, such as random forest for IV [Athey et al., 2019], an estimator based on the assump- tion of the existence of some invalid and some valid IVs (sis- VIVE) [Kang et al., 2016], and IV.tetrad [Silva and Shimizu, 2017], but they do not identify conditioning sets. We differ- entiate our work from these works in the Related Work sec- tion in more detail and compare our method with them in the Experiments section.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	In this paper, we design an algorithm for identifying a con- ditional set that instrumentalizes a given ancestral IV, a type of conditional IVs, in data directly. In order to achieve this, we study the graphical properties of an ancestral IV using a MAG (maximal ancestral graph [Richardson and Spirtes, 2002; Zhang, 2008a]) and develop the theory for data-driven discovery of a conditioning set for a given ancestral IV. To the best of our knowledge, there is no existing method for finding a conditioning set of a conditional IV directly from data.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	We study the novel graphical properties of an ancestral IV using MAGs, which enables a data-driven approach to applying the IV method to obtain unbiased causal ef- fect estimation when there are latent confounders.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	We establish graphical criteria for determining a condi- tioning set of a given ancestral IV via a MAG (PAG).
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	Based on the theorems, we propose an effective algo- rithm for unbiased causal effect estimation from data with latent variables. The experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the performance of the proposed algorithm.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	A path π between Vi and Vj in a graph comprises a se- quence of distinct nodes ⟨Vi, . . . , Vj⟩ with every pair of suc- cessive nodes being adjacent. Vi and Vj are end nodes of π, and other nodes on π are non-end nodes. A path is a di- rected or causal path if all edges along it are directed such as Vi → . . . → Vj. We use ‘∗’ to indicate an arbitrary edge mark of an edge, i.e. arrow (>), tail (−) or circle (◦). Vi is a collider on a path if Vi−1→ Vi ←Vi+1 is in G. A collider path is a path on which every non-endpoint node is a collider. A path of length one is a trivial collider path.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	of all adjacent nodes, parents, children, ancestors, descen- dants, spouses and possible ancestors of V , respectively, in the same way as in [Perkovi´c et al., 2018]. The definitions of a node’s parents, children, ancestors and descendants are pro- vided in Appendix A [Cheng et al., 2022]. A directed cycle occurs when the first and last nodes on a path are the same node. A DAG contains directed edges without cycles. In a DAG with observed and unobserved variables, if there exists Vi ← U → Vj where U is a latent variable, Vi and Vj are often called spouses to each other.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	Ancestral graphs are often used to represent the mecha- nisms of the data generation process that may involve la- tent variables [Zhang, 2008a]. An ancestral graph is a graph that does not contain directed cycles or almost directed cy- cles [Richardson and Spirtes, 2002]. An almost directed cycle occurs if Vi ↔ Vj and Vj ∈ An(Vi).
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	To save space, the definitions of Markov property, faithful- ness, d-separation (denoted as ⊥⊥d), d-connecting (denoted as ⊥̸⊥d), m-separation (denoted as ⊥⊥m), m-connecting (de- noted as ⊥̸⊥m), and the graphical criteria of d-separation and m-separation are introduced in Appendix A. Definition 1 (MAG). An ancestral graph M = (V, E) is a MAG when every pair of non-adjacent nodes Vi and Vj in M are m-separated by a set Z ⊆ V\{Vi, Vj}.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	A DAG obviously meets the conditions of a MAG, so syn- tactically, a DAG is also a MAG without bi-directed edges. It is worth noting that a causal DAG over a set of observed and unobserved variables can be converted to a MAG over the observed variables uniquely according to the construction rules [Zhang, 2008b]. A set of Markov equivalent MAGs can be represented uniquely by a partial ancestral graph (PAG) that is defined in Appendix A. Definition 2 (Visibility [Zhang, 2008a]). Given a MAG M = (V, E), a directed edge Vi → Vj is visible if there is a node Vk /∈ Adj(Vj), such that either there is an edge between Vk and Vi that is into Vi, or there is a collider path between Vk and Vi that is into Vi and every node on this path is a parent of Vj. Otherwise, Vi → Vj is said to be invisible.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	In a given DAG G, if Vi and Vj are not adjacent and Vi /∈ An(Vj), then P a(Vi) blocks all paths between Vi to Vj. In a given MAG M, there is a similar conclusion, but the blocked set is D-SEP (Vi, Vj) as defined below, instead of P a(Vi). Definition 3 (D-SEP (Vi, Vj) in a MAG M [Spirtes et al., 2000]). In a MAG M = (V, E), assume that Vi and Vj are not adjacent. A node Vk ∈ D-SEP (Vi, Vj) if Vk ̸= Vi, and there is a collider path between Vk to Vi such that every node on this path (including Vk) is in An(Vi) or An(Vj) in M.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	Figure 1: An example of a standard IV represented in two types of causal graphs: (a) DAG; (b) MAG where W → Y is invisible.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	The variable S in the DAG in Fig. 1 (a) depicts a standard IV w.r.t. W → Y . Given a standard IV S, the causal effect of W on Y , denoted as βwy can be calculated as σsy/σsw, where σsy and σsw are the estimated causal effect of S on Y and the causal effect of S on W , respectively.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	In the above definition, GW is the DAG obtained by remov- ing W → Y from G. It is worth noting that Z is a set of observed variables and Z ̸= ∅ for a conditional IV S.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	Detention 5 allows a conditional IV S such that S is not related to W , but conditioning on Z, is related to W when Z contains a descendant of S. This might lead to a misleading result [Van der Zander et al., 2015]. The following defined notion mitigates this issue. Definition 6 (Ancestral IV in DAG [Van der Zander et al., 2015]). Given a DAG G = (X ∪ U ∪ {W, Y }, E), a variable S ∈ X is said to be an ancestral IV w.r.t. W → Y , if there exists a set of observed variables Z ⊆ X \ {S} such that (i) S ⊥̸⊥d W \| Z, (ii) S ⊥⊥d Y \| Z in GW , and (iii) Z ⊆ {An(Y ) ∪ An(S)} and ∀Z ∈ Z, Z /∈ De(Y ).
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	In a given DAG G, an ancestral IV is a conditional IV, but a conditional IV may not be an ancestral IV. However, the application of a standard IV, conditional IV or ancestral IV requires that a causal DAG G = (X ∪ U ∪ {W, Y }, E) must be completely known. Often, it is impractical to get such complete causal knowledge in real-world applications.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	Using the IV approach, one way to estimate βwy from data is to employ the generalized linear model. In this work, we consider the potential outcome model [Imbens and Rubin, 2015] to calculate βwy as introduced in the following.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	as regressors. Hence, the estimated coefficient of f T (z) ˆw is ˆβwy. For more details on the estimator, please refer to the literature [Sjolander and Martinussen, 2019].
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	Furthermore, we consider the case that an ancestral IV S in a DAG is a cause or spouse of W (i.e. a node in {P a(W ) ∪ Sp(W )}) because it is easy to know a cause of W or a spouse of W that is not a direct cause or spouse of Y . In the graphic term, S is adjacent to W but not to Y . For example, when estimating causal effect of Smoking on Lung Cancer, Income is a direct cause of Smoking, but not a direct cause of Lung Cancer [Spirtes et al., 2000]. Hence, Income can be used as an IV. It is feasible for users to find an S similar to the case described above. When we infer causal effect from data, we follow the convention in causal inference, that is, the causal DAG G satisfies Markov property, the causal DAG G and the data are faithful to each other [Spirtes et al., 2000; Pearl, 2009]. All proofs in this section are provided in Ap- pendix B.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	the latent confounder between W and Y , we develop a lemma for properly mapping an IV in a DAG to a MAG. Lemma 1. Given a DAG G = (X ∪ U ∪ {W, Y }, E′) with the edges W → Y and W ← U → Y in E′, and U ∈ U. Let M = (X ∪ {W, Y }, E) be the MAG mapped from G based on the construction rules [Zhang, 2008b]. Suppose that there exists an ancestral IV S conditioning on a set Z ⊆ X \ {S} in G. In the mapped MAG M, the edge W → Y is invisible and there is an edge S → Y or S ↔ Y .
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	We take the standard IV S in the DAG of Fig. 1 (a) as an example to explain the lemma. In this, S is a standard IV w.r.t. W → Y and S ∈ An(Y ), so the IV S in the mapped MAG M has a directed edge S → Y as shown in Fig. 1 (b) and the edge W → Y is invisible.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	Therefore, we have the following corollary for finding a set Z ⊆ X \ {S} in a MAG M that instrumentalizes S in the underlying DAG G. Corollary 1. Given a DAG G = (X ∪ U ∪ {W, Y }, E′) with the edges W → Y and W ← U → Y in E′, and U ∈ U, and let M = (X ∪ {W, Y }, E) be the MAG mapped from G. For a given ancestral IV S, D-SEP (S, Y ) in the mapped MAG M is a set that instrumentalizes S in the DAG G.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	Corollary 1 provides a theoretical solution for determining a conditioning set that instrumentalizes a given ancestral IV S in the underlying DAG. Taking a data-driven approach, we can learn a PAG from data with latent variables, but for each of the Markov equivalent MAGs represented by the PAG, there is a corresponding D-SEP (S, Y ) for S. We do not know which MAG is the ground-truth MAG that is mapped from the underlying DAG, and hence we do not know which D-SEP (S, Y ) is the true conditioning set for S. To provide a precise causal effect estimation, in the next section, we pro- pose a theorem to determine a conditioning set Z from a PAG, in which non-ancestral nodes of S or Y may be contained in Z, but do not result in bias.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	For a given ancestral IV S, we have the following theorem for determining a set Z in a PAG P that instrumentalizes S. Theorem 1. Given a DAG G = (X ∪ U ∪ {W, Y }, E′) with the edges W → Y and W ← U → Y in E′, and U ∈ U, and let M = (X ∪ {W, Y }, E) be the MAG mapped from G. From data, the mapped MAG M is represented by a PAG P = (X ∪ {W, Y }, E′′). For a given ancestral IV S which is a cause or spouse of W , the set P ossAn(S ∪ Y ) \ {W, S} in the learned P is a set that instumentalizes S in the DAG G. Note that P ossAn(S ∪ Y ) \ {W, S} is a superset of D- SEP (S, Y ) since the former may contain non-ancestral nodes of S or Y , and do not result in bias. Theorem 1 al- lows us to discover the conditioning set as P ossAn(S ∪ Y ) \ {W, S} from the manipulated PAG PW (cid:101)S for the given ances- tral IV S without complete causal knowledge.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	As presented in Algorithm 1, AIViP (Line 1) employs a global causal structure learning method to discover a PAG In this work, we employ from data with latent variables. rFCI [Colombo et al., 2012] and use the function rfci in the R package pcalg [Kalisch et al., 2012] to implement rFCI. Lines 2 and 3 construct the manipulated PAG PW (cid:101)S and get P ossAn(S ∪ Y ) \ {W, S} from the PAG PW (cid:101)S. Lines 4 to 7 estimate ˆβwy by the two-stage regression in Eq.(1). We use the function glm in the R package stats to fit ˆw and the function ivglm in the R package ivtools [Sjolander and Mar- tinussen, 2019] to fit ˆy.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	comparison experiments, including the IV.tetrad in [Silva and Shimizu, 2017]; some invalid some valid IV estimator (sis- VIVE) [Kang et al., 2016]; two-stage least squares for stan- dard IV (TSLS) [Angrist and Imbens, 1995], the most popular estimator; An extension of TSLS for a conditional IV by con- ditioning on the set of all variables X \ {S} (TSLSCIV) [Im- bens, 2014]; the causal random forest for IV regression (FIVR), with a given conditional IV [Athey et al., 2019].
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	It is worth noting that since IV.tetrad is the only other data-driven conditional IV method, we also include the data- driven standard IV method (sisVIVE), the most popular stan- dard IV method (TSLS) and its extension to condition IVs (TSLSCIV), and the popular random forest based estimator with a given conditional IV (FIVR).
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	Implementation and Parameter Setting. The implemen- tation of IV.tetrad is retrieved from the authors’ site1. The parameters of num ivs and num boot are set to 3 (1 for VitD) and 500, respectively. We report the average result of 500 bootstrapping as the final estimated ˆβwy for IV.tetrad. The implementation of TSLSCIV is based on the functions glm and ivglm in the R packages stats and ivtools, respectively. TSLS is implemented by using the function ivreg in the R package AER [Greene, 2003]. FIVR is implemented by using the function instrumental forest in the R package grf [Athey et al., 2019]. The implementation of sisVIVE is based on the function sisVIVE in the R package sisVIVE. The significance level is set to 0.05 for rFCI used by AIViP.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	Evaluation Metrics. For the synthetic dataset with the true βwy, we report the estimation bias, \|( ˆβwy − βwy)/βwy\| ∗ 100 (%). For the real-world datasets, we empirically evaluate the performance of all estimators with the results reported in the corresponding references since the true βwy is not available, and we provide the corresponding 95% confidence interval (C.I.) of ˆβwy for all estimators.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	We conduct simulation studies to evaluate the performance of AIViP when W and Y share a latent confounder U . We generate two groups of synthetic datasets with a range of sample sizes: 2k (i.e. 2,000), 3k, 4k, 5k, 6k, 8k, 10k, 12k, 15k, 18k, and 20k. The set of observed variables X is {X1, X2, . . . , X23, S}. We add two and three latent variables for Group I and Group II datasets respectively. The generated synthetic datasets satisfy the three conditions of ancestral IV in Definition 6. The details of the data generating process are provided in Appendix C. To make the results reliable, each reported result is the average of 20 repeated simulations. The estimation biases of all estimators on both groups of synthetic datasets are reported in Table 1.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	Table 1: Summary of the estimation bias (%) on both groups of syn- thetic datasets. The smallest estimation bias on each group is bold- faced. AIViP consistently obtains good performance on all datasets.
Processed_Ancestral_Instrument_Method_for_Causal_Inference_w.txt	which shows that conditioning on all variables is inappropri- ate since the data contains collider bias. (3) The estimation bi- ases of AIViP on both groups of datasets show that AIViP out- performs FIVR and sisVIVE. This is because both methods fail to detect either colliders or confounding bias in the data. (4) AIViP slightly outperforms IV.tetrad in Group I datasets and the two methods have similar performance in Group II datasets. Note that IV.tetrad performs well with synthetic datasets, but not with real-world datasets since its data distri- bution assumption may not be satisfied in real-world datasets.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	Abstract: The Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathﬁnder (ASKAP) will give us an unprecedented opportunity to investigate the transient sky at radio wavelengths. In this paper we present VAST, an ASKAP survey for Variables and Slow Transients. VAST will exploit the wide-ﬁeld survey capabilities of ASKAP to enable the discovery and investigation of variable and transient phenomena from the local to the cosmological, including ﬂare stars, intermittent pulsars, X-ray binaries, magnetars, extreme scattering events, interstellar scintillation, radio supernovae and orphan afterglows of gamma ray bursts. In addition, it will allow us to probe unexplored regions of parameter space where new classes of transient sources may be detected. In this paper we review the known radio transient and variable populations and the current results from blind radio surveys. We outline a comprehensive program based on a multi-tiered survey strategy to characterise the radio transient sky through detection and monitoring of transient and variable sources on the ASKAP imaging timescales of ﬁve seconds and greater. We also present an analysis of the expected source populations that we will be able to detect with VAST.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	where A is the eﬀective collecting area of the telescope, Ω is the solid angle coverage of the survey, T is the total duration of the observations and ∆t is the time resolu- tion (Cordes et al. 2004; Cordes 2007). Typically blind radio surveys have had either too small a ﬁeld of view and too little time coverage per ﬁeld of view to al- low a comprehensive survey for transient and variable phenomena.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	The Square Kilometre Array (SKA)1 is a proposed future radio telescope (Dewdney et al. 2009) that will be many times more sensitive than any existing facil- ity. Should it go ahead, the SKA will be designed to explore ﬁve key science projects: galaxy evolution, cos- mology and dark energy; strong-ﬁeld tests of gravity using pulsars and black holes; the origin and evolu- tion of cosmic magnetism; probing the dark ages — the ﬁrst black holes and stars; and the cradle of life, searching for life and planets. In addition, there is an awareness of building in (or not designing out) the possibility of serendipitous discoveries. In particular, the dynamic radio sky is recognised as a rich and rela- tively unexplored discovery space (Cordes et al. 2004; Cordes 2007). Plans for the SKA are still under de- velopment, with a Phase 1 instrument expected to be completed in 2020, and a Phase 2 instrument in 2024. The Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathﬁnder (ASKAP)2 is a precursor and technology development platform for the full SKA and will greatly improve on our ability to detect radio transients and variable sources. Its moderately high sensitivity (RMS of ∼1 mJy beam−1 in 10 seconds), combined with a wide ﬁeld of view (cov- ering 30 square degrees of sky in a single pointing) will enable fast, sensitive all-sky surveys (Johnston et al. 2007, 2008). ASKAP is currently under construction in Western Australia. The ﬁnal telescope will have 36 12-metre antennas, with a maximum baseline of 6 km. The wide ﬁeld of view is enabled by the use of Phased Array Feeds (Chippendale et al. 2010) of 100 dual-polarisation pixels that will operate over the range 700–1800 MHz. A summary of the planned ASKAP speciﬁcations is given in Table 1. The 6- antenna Boolardy Engineering Test Array (BETA), is expected to be completed in late 2012 and will allow some early testing of the techniques required for the full ASKAP surveys.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	to detect and monitor ﬂare stars, cataclysmic variables and X-ray binaries in our Galaxy; and • to discover previously unknown classes of ob- jects.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	to detect and monitor ﬂare stars, cataclysmic variables and X-ray binaries in our Galaxy; and • to discover previously unknown classes of ob- jects.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	Table 2: Survey parameters for the VAST surveys (see Section 4.1 for details). The two components of the VAST-Deep survey are discussed further in the text. The Commensal column gives an indication of the amount of time that VAST will have access to through commensal observing with other ASKAP projects.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	ASKAP projects: VAST-Wide, aimed at detecting rare, bright events, will survey 10 000 square degrees per day to an RMS sensitivity of 0.5 mJy beam−1; VAST- Deep, aimed at detecting unknown source classes, will survey 10 000 square degrees down to an RMS sensitiv- ity of 50µJy beam−1; and VAST-Galactic which will cover 750 square degrees of the Galactic plane, plus the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds down to an RMS sensitivity of 0.1 mJy beam−1. The full survey parameters are shown in Table 2 and discussed in Sec- tion 4.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	a number of unresolved questions about their nature, including the existence of radio orphan afterglows (Levinson et al. 2002), the beaming fraction of gamma-ray bursts (Sari et al. 1999; Dalal et al. 2002), and the current rate of mas- sive star formation in the Universe as traced by the cosmological radio supernova rate. These questions can be addressed by surveys that observe a large area of sky to good sensitivity, on a regular basis. The ca- pacity of VAST to detect these rare objects is orders of magnitude greater than previous blind surveys such as those of Gal-Yam et al. (2006) or Bower et al. (2007).
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	In Section 2 we motivate the VAST surveys by dis- cussing the science goals in more detail, and explain how they ﬁt in the context of existing eﬀorts. We also make predictions about the likely source populations that will be observed by VAST. In Section 3 we review previous and current blind radio surveys, as well as archival studies. In Section 4 we describe the proposed VAST survey strategy in detail. Finally, in Section 5 we discuss the design of the VAST transient detection pipeline.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	Astronomical transient phenomena are diverse in na- ture, but they can be broadly classiﬁed on the ba- sis of their underlying physical mechanism into one of four general categories: explosions, propagation ef- fects, accretion-driven, and magnetic ﬁeld-driven events. In this section we discuss the main VAST science goals in each of these areas and discuss the expected popu- lations for diﬀerent types of sources.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	The afterglow emission from gamma-ray bursts is gen- erated via particle acceleration in the decelerating blast wave. At late times, the peak of the afterglow spec- trum is at radio energies, and thus radio studies pro- vide the most interesting probes for GRBs science. Based on previous studies (Chandra & Frail 2012), we expect that the GRBs seen by ASKAP will be long- lasting but intrinsically fainter on average than shorter wavelength afterglows. Given the sensitivity of ASKAP, this means that those GRBs studied by VAST will, in general, be the rare but important nearby (∼1500 Mpc) events. In the relativistic expansion phase (up to 100 days after the initial explosion), ASKAP monitoring in conjunction with optical and X-ray facilities will allow us to measure physical parameters such as the total kinetic energy of the explosion, the density of the cir- cumburst medium and the geometry of the outﬂow.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	ergies from a large sample of single-epoch ﬂux density measurements (and limits) of afterglows at late times (Shivvers & Berger 2011).
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	As the relativistic beaming is totally suppressed at late time, radio monitoring is the best solution to identify ‘orphan afterglows’, i.e., those GRBs whose jet is beamed away from us (Rhoads 1997). While they would lack a gamma-ray trigger by deﬁnition, such systems could be distinguished from other classes of transients through the evolution and luminosity of their light curves, their location towards galaxies that resemble other GRB hosts, and their probable asso- ciation with supernovae (Soderberg et al. 2010). The discovery of a population of orphan afterglows would allow us to constrain the beaming fraction of GRBs – a key quantity for understanding the true GRB event rate. It would also open up an order of magnitude more objects which can be scrutinised in detail. This may also give insights on the jet structure of GRBs and clarify the puzzling lack of jet breaks from the Swift satellite (Racusin et al. 2009).
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	While thermonuclear (Type Ia) supernovae have proven to be extremely useful in measuring the acceleration of the Universe, no Type Ia SN has ever been detected at radio wavelengths (Panagia et al. 2006; Hancock et al. 2011; Chomiuk et al. 2012), indicating a very low den- sity of circumstellar material. In contrast, many core- collapse SNe (those of Type Ib, Ic, and the various Type II sub-classes) have been detected and monitored at radio wavelengths (Weiler et al. 2002; Ryder et al. 2004; Soderberg 2007). Radio observations replay the late phases of stellar evolution (in reverse), and reveal clues about the late-time evolution of the progenitor system.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	With VAST we will conduct an unbiased census of core-collapse SNe (a still undetermined fraction of which emit at radio wavelengths), allowing us to match radio detections against optically-discovered SNe. We will also detect new radio SNe that may have gone un- detected in the optical or infrared due to signiﬁcant amounts of dust (Kankare et al. 2008). The preva- lence of such heavily-obscured SNe is virtually uncon- strained, with hints that they may constitute a non- trivial subpopulation. Recently, SN 2008cs (Kankare et al. 2008) was detected in the IR and conﬁrmed in the radio bands, and SN 2008iz (Brunthaler et al. 2009) was serendipitously discovered in radio observations of M 82. SN 2008iz has remained undetected in the optical, IR, and X-ray bands despite sensitive searches (Brunthaler et al. 2010). Discovery of new SNe is valu- able for tying down the current rate of massive star formation in the Universe and for understanding how and when SNe explode in star-bursting galaxies. Radio emission from core-collapse SNe is detectable within days, and they reach their peak luminosity at 1.4 GHz as much as one year after the explosion, making them ideal targets to detect and study with the sensitivity and cadence of VAST (see Section 4).
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	ticular interest. For instance, radio observations of a recent type Ib/c supernova, SN2009bb, showed that it was expanding at mildly relativistic velocities (β ≈ 0.8) powered by the central engine (Soderberg et al. 2010). Such SNe are usually associated with GRBs and are discovered by their intense but short-lived gamma- ray energy emission. Yet, SN2009bb had no detected gamma-ray counterpart. It has been suggested that the blast-waves produced in such engine-driven SNe could be responsible for the acceleration of ultra-high energy cosmic-rays (Chakraborti et al. 2011). How- ever, the present limits on the neutrino ﬂux expected as a by-product of cosmic-ray production in GRBs are at least a factor of 3.7 below predictions (Abbasi et al. 2012). Radio surveys with the capability of complet- ing the sample of these explosions will improve our un- derstanding of particle acceleration processes and the diversity of core-collapse events (see Lien et al. 2011, for predictions on the detection rates of core-collapse radio SNe for a range of SKA pathﬁnder instruments).
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	Gravitational wave (GW) events are expected to be compact and involve signiﬁcant energies—both GRBs and SNe are considered to be among likely sources of both electromagnetic and GW emission. In an analo- gous manner, other classes of GW events may also gen- erate signiﬁcant transient radio emission, especially if they occur in dense environments. We discuss the par- ticular case of mergers of neutron star binaries in Sec- tion 2.3.4. For all classes of GW events, however, local- isation will be a signiﬁcant challenge, with search areas expected to be of order 10–100 deg2 for planned GW detectors (Fairhurst 2011). The large instantaneous sky coverage of ASKAP makes it particularly valuable in the search for electromagnetic counterparts to GW events, although there are signiﬁcant uncertainties in the requisite search sensitivities and timescales. The search area estimates mentioned above are computed for the Advanced LIGO (Harry et al. 2010) and Ad- vanced VIRGO (Accadia et al. 2011) detectors. These systems are planned to come online in the 2014–2015 timeframe, meaning that ASKAP will be well-positioned to make discoveries in this parameter space.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	The density inhomogeneities in the ionised ISM are typically characterised as a power law (Armstrong et al. 1995). However, a small number of pulsars have dis- played strong fringing events in their dynamic spec- tra, in which the normal, random appearance of the dynamic spectrum caused by DISS is modiﬁed by the appearance of quasi-periodic fringes. Both pulsars and AGN have displayed extreme scattering events (ESEs) in their light curves, in which their ﬂux densities ex- hibit marked decreases (≈ 50%) bracketed by modest increases; and a number of AGN have exhibited intra- day variability (IDV), marked by ﬂux density varia- tions on time scales of hours. Fringing events are in- terpreted most naturally as the beating of two distinct images of the pulsar and both ESEs and IDV can be interpreted as due to lensing events through a plasma. All of these phenomena could occur if there is a tem- porary increase in the amount of power on scales of order 1013 cm along or close to the the line of sight, e.g., as due to a discrete “cloud” of electrons drifting in front of the pulsar or AGN (Cordes & Wolszczan 1986; Clegg et al. 1998). In the case of IDV, it may also be the case that transient, high brightness temperature structures are required to be produced in the cores of some AGN.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	The characteristics of the discrete structures in- ferred to be responsible for these phenomena are such (density > 100 cm−3, temperature > 103 K) that they would be highly overpressured with respect to the bulk properties of the ISM (Kulkarni & Heiles 1988), and would likely be transient structures. While there is some evidence to suggest that a small fraction of the volume of the ISM is at a high pressure (Jenkins & Tripp 2001), the distribution of such highly overpressured structures is not known, although the characteristics of IDV in some AGN suggest that some structures are extremely close to the Sun (∼ 1 − 10 pc). The exis- tence of such highly over-pressured structures in the local ISM is hard to reconcile with our current under- standing of interstellar turbulence (e.g. Fiedler et al. 1987b; Walker 2007). Alternatively, these phenomena may indicate that a simple power law is not a good de- scription of the spectrum of density inhomogeneities, which would then constrain the nature of the plasma processes involved in the generation and maintenance of the density inhomogeneities.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	Because these propagation events are transient in nature, many of the previous observations have been “accidental,” happening to catch a source displaying such an event during the course of observations de- signed for other reasons. There have been relatively few surveys designed speciﬁcally to try to ﬁnd prop- agation events, with notable examples being the Green Bank Interferometer (GBI) monitoring program (Fielder et al. 1994; Lazio et al. 2001b) and the MASIV survey (Lovell et al. 2003, 2008). Moreover, because of either limited sensi- tivity, limited ﬁeld of view, or both, most surveys have only been able to monitor a relatively small number (∼ 100) of relatively strong sources (& 100 mJy).
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	agation events and the likelihood of a source exhibit- ing such an event. In turn, these much stronger con- straints can be used to infer properties of the ionised ISM and the mechanisms by which such structures are generated. As an illustration of the kind of monitoring program that ASKAP will enable, a survey could be designed to produce daily ﬂux density measurements of sources stronger than about 10 mJy with the capa- bility to detect 50% ﬂux density changes at the 10σ level. At this sensitivity level, a survey of even only 1000 deg2 would still be able to monitor nearly com- pact 50,000 sources. Gravitational Lensing: Aside from the plasma prop- agation eﬀects discussed in more detail below, we also note that strong gravitational lensing of active galax- ies by galaxy clusters can lead to an achromatic time- domain signal that contains information about both the active galaxy and about the intervening space- time. Radio observations of strong lensing have been conducted successfully with existing facilities and those data have been used to constrain cosmological parame- ters (e.g Fassnacht et al. 1999; Myers et al. 2003). These operate by spatially separating the lensed components of the active galaxy. In general ASKAP will not have the angular resolution to observe such multiple imag- ing, but the large number of sources monitored with regular cadence means that auto-correlation analysis (as performed by Barnacka et al. 2011) can itself con- strain lens time delays.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	The well known temporal broadening of pulsar pulses caused by scattering from electron-density variations will aﬀect any source of short duration bursts, includ- ing those that will be targeted by VAST. Pulse broad- ening from sources in the Galactic center can be broader than 1000 sec at 1 GHz. Bursts from extragalactic sources at cosmological distances can similarly be broad- ened, especially if the line of sight intersects another galaxy but also from the intergalactic medium (IGM). Scattering in the Milky Way, in other galaxies, and in the IGM therefore deﬁne pulse-broadening horizons beyond which pulses with speciﬁc widths will not be seen (see, e.g., Cordes 2012). Pulse broadening from scattering can be distinguished from source-intrinsic eﬀects by identifying across the ASKAP band the strong frequency dependence ∼∝ ν −4 of scatter broadening.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	Figure 1: in Q0954+658 at 2.7 GHz (lower) and 8.1 GHz (upper) adapted from Fiedler et al. (1987b). For clarity, an oﬀset of 1 Jy has been added to the top trace. The strong frequency dependence of ESEs and the neces- sity of regular sampling of the light curves over a long period is evident. At ASKAP frequencies (∼ 1 GHz), the amplitude of the ﬂux density decrease would likely have been even larger, and the ﬂux density would likely have increased to an even higher value during the start of the event.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	that they are present in vast numbers in the Galaxy (with a density ∼ 103 pc−3). If the refracting proper- ties are taken at face value, they imply regions with pressures ∼ 1000 times higher than the diﬀuse ionized ISM. One suggestion is that they are associated with neutral, self-gravitating gas clouds (Walker 2007), in which case they would make a substantial contribu- tion to the total baryonic mass content of the Galaxy. Alternatively, they may represent small-scale density enhancements created by converging ﬂows in a turbu- lent medium (Jenkins & Tripp 2001), but it is unclear whether such structures could persist for the observed ESE durations.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	A wide-area survey, with daily cadence would al- low us to address the physical composition and origin of the objects responsible for ESEs in a comprehensive manner.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	Population statistics: One of the more comprehen- sive ESE surveys (Fiedler et al. 1994b) provided a to- tal coverage of approximately 600 source-years; VAST has the potential to achieve a coverage that is larger by a factor of roughly 300, searching for ESEs toward sources with much lower ﬂux densities. In turn, in- creased coverage will constrain the spatial density and distribution of refracting lenses in the Galaxy, includ- ing whether they are associated with particular Galac- tic structures (Fiedler et al. 1994a). A larger number of ESEs will also allow investigation into any poten- tial diversity in light curve shapes, and whether any such diversity can be understood in terms of simple models (Clegg et al. 1998) or the extent to which more complex models of the density structures, background sources, or both are required.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	Real-time characterisation of ESEs: A straight- forward approach to elucidating the nature of the struc- tures responsible for ESEs would be to conduct ad- ditional observations of a source while it is undergo- ing an ESE. Events like those seen towards quasars B0954+658 and B1749+096 (Fiedler et al. 1994b) or B1741−038 (Fiedler et al. 1992; Clegg et al. 1996) should be seen at the rate of roughly 60 per year in an all-sky monitoring survey with ∼1 mJy RMS sensitivity, with ∼10 in progress at any given moment. Thus, in con- trast to the GBI monitoring program, for which only one ESE was identiﬁed while it was on-going, VAST will enable real-time follow-up.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	Some key follow-up measurements could be made at higher frequencies, particularly in the optical to X-ray bands, which should directly reveal the dense neutral gas clouds responsible for ESEs via scattering, absorption and refraction (Draine 1998). Addition- ally, H i observations would reveal any associated neu- tral structures, Faraday rotation measurements may constrain the magnetic ﬁeld strength within the struc- tures, and high resolution observations could conﬁrm predicted changes in the apparent structure of the source. While there have been previous eﬀorts in conducting such observations (Clegg et al. 1996; Lazio et al. 2000, 2001a), only one source has been observed in such a manner (B1741−038), and, for some of the measure- ments, only a single observation during the actual ESE could be obtained. An all-sky survey could detect mul- tiple ESEs during the course of a year, allowing am- ple opportunity to trigger follow-up observations with other telescopes and at other wavelengths.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	Observations of decimetre variability in extragalactic sources (e.g., Hunstead 1972) led quickly to the recog- nition that the sources needed to have extremely com- pact components, be aﬀected by interstellar scintilla- tion, or both (Armstrong et al. 1977; Spangler et al. 1989). The need for extremely compact components, apparently violating the so-called inverse Compton catas- trophe, became even more acute with the discovery of “ﬂickering” (Heeschen 1984), and later intra-day vari- ability.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	The MASIV 5GHz VLA Survey (Lovell et al. 2003, 2008) and other observations (Kedziora-Chudczer et al. 1997; Dennett-Thorpe & de Bruyn 2002; Bignall et al. 2003, 2006) have established that the fast—intra-day and inter-day—ﬂux density variations at centimetre wavelengths exhibited by a subset of compact quasars are predominantly caused by ISS rather than intrin- sic variability. Intra-day variability refers to sources whose characteristic timescale is less than 24 hours, while inter-day variability refers to sources whose timescale exceeds this.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	Scintillating AGN are of astrophysical interest be- cause the small angular sizes that they must possess in order to exhibit rapid ISS require brightness tem- peratures near, or possibly in excess of, the 1012 K in- verse Compton limit for incoherent synchrotron radi- In several cases over the past decade, it ap- ation.
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	peared that the Doppler boosting factors required in order to reconcile the apparent brightness tempera- ture with the inverse Compton limit were well in ex- cess of the typical values determined from Very Long Baseline interferometric observations of quasars. Es- timates of the Doppler boosting factors are subject to considerable uncertainty related to the distance of the scattering material from Earth, but many of the most rapid IDVs appear to require Doppler factors of a few tens (Macquart et al. 2000; Rickett et al. 2002; Bignall et al. 2006; Macquart & de Bruyn 2007).
Processed_VAST:_An_ASKAP_Survey_for_Variables_and_Slow_Trans.txt	More recently, it appears that the fastest mani- festations of IDV are associated with sources whose lines of sight intersect more local, albeit much more inhomogeneous, patches of turbulence than previously supposed. Thus there has been a transfer of our ig- norance away from the physics of the AGN and onto the physics of interstellar turbulence. However, this issue is not yet conclusively resolved, as little is known about the origin (or physical plausibility) of the local, highly inhomogeneous scattering screens that need to be invoked to explain the observed scintillation prop- erties of these sources.

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.