Filename
stringlengths 22
64
| Paragraph
stringlengths 8
5.57k
|
|---|---|
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Figure 4 presents the average bias and its confidence interval based on the average SE by sample size and simulation scenario for the bivariate Poisson regression model. It shows that, for all simulation scenarios, both the average bias and SE tend to be 0 as the sample size increases. This suggests the consistency and unbiasedness of the MLE estimator for large samples. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Figure 5 presents the coverage rate for each parameter by sample size and simulation scenario for the bivariate Poisson regression model. Overall, all empirical coverage rates are close to the nominal level of 95%, varying between 90% and 98% approximately. In special, the coverage rate of regression parameters β0r are slightly greater than the nominal level. For the variance of random effects σr, the coverage rate is slightly smaller than the nominal level. Finally, for the correlation between random effects ρ, the coverage rate is slightly lower when ρ = .5, and slightly greater when ρ = {0, −0.5} compared to the 95% nominal level. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Even for the Poisson distribution, which is the simplest case to estimate because there is no dispersion parameter, there were 13 out of 1800 (3×4×150) simulations that did not return SE for some parameters estimates or produced extreme values due to large SEs that were not considered into the results. We used the PORT algorithm to estimate the model because it was more stable and faster than BFGS in most situations. It also happened in Kristensen et al. (2016), where 9 study cases from different model settings ranging from linear regression to multivariate stochastic volatility models were considered, and PORT had a better performance than BFGS. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Figure 6 suggests that for all simulation scenarios, both the average bias and SE tend to be 0 as the sample size increases. This suggests the consistency and unbiasedness of the MLE estimator for large samples. Concerning the variance of the random effect σ1 and σ2 were slightly underestimated. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Overall, Figure 7 shows that the empirical coverage rates are close to the nominal level of 95%. In particular, the coverage rate of regression parameters β0r, the variance of random effects σr and the correlation between random effects ρ are slightly greater than the nominal level. On the opposite, there was a coverage rate close to 80% for ρ estimated when the sample size was equal to 100 and ρ = 0. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Estimation problems were more severe for the bivariate NB regression model compared to It was also the Poisson and occurred in 740 out of 3600 (3×4×300) simulations (20,6%). necessary to remove those iterations when the dispersion parameter φ was greater than 5 from the results (we simulated at 1). |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Figure 8 shows that, for all simulation scenarios, the SE tends to be 0 as the sample size increases, but the bias does not. This suggests the non-consistency of the MLE estimator. Moreover, almost every estimate is biased. While ν2 is overestimated, ν1 is underestimated (and the bias does not decrease with an increase in sample size). The correlation parameter ρ has a typical behavior: when the data was simulated with ρ = 0 there was almost no bias, for ρ = .5 a negative bias and for ρ = −.5 a positive bias; the model forces the correlation param- eter towards zero. The standard deviation of random effect σ2 is overestimated, while σ1 is slightly underestimated. Regarding the regression parameters, β02 is slightly underestimated and β01 suggests a negligible bias. An interesting possible relationship among parameters is that when ν was overestimated (making the model more underdispersed: ν > 1), σ was also overestimated (increasing the variance of the model). In contrast, when ν was underestimated (making the model even more overdispersed: ν < 1), σ was also underestimated (decreasing the variance of the model). It seems that when ν makes the dispersion of the model greater, σ makes the variance lower, and vice versa. It may be related because of a possible non-orthogonality between these parameters. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Estimation problems were more severe for the COM-Poisson regression model compared to the Poisson and less severe if compared to NB, accounting for 245 (10,2%) out of 2400 (3×4×200). Besides the rules used for Poisson to classify extreme values, it was necessary to remove those models when the dispersion parameter ν was greater than 4 and the SE of ρ estimate was greater than 2. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | The estimation process started with a simple random sample (SRS) of size 300 (seed 2390) for AHS data. The parameters obtained from the sample were used as initial values to fit the model to the whole dataset. For ANT data, we did not use this step because of the small size of the dataset (30). We then optimize the same model more than once iterating over optimizers. In the first round we used PORT routines and its final estimates were used as initial estimates to optimize the same model with BFGS; in its turn, the final estimates from BFGS were used as initial estimates to PORT; and another final round to PORT. We used this rationale because these models are complex to estimate and this procedure produced reasonable results. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Besides the full model presented in section 3, we also tried to estimate four simpler versions to check whether the model was over-specified. We made the simplifications either by fixing values from the Σ or the dispersion parameter. The first one aimed to reproduce independent response variables setting the correlation parameter to 0. In the second version, we fixed φ = 1 and ν = 1.5 for NB and COM-Poisson models inducing small overdispersion and underdispersion, respectively. In the third simplified model, we set the variance to 1. The last strategy used only a single variance parameter to estimate all response variables. The last three simpler versions described aimed to answer whether we can estimate both dispersion and variance parameters in the same model. We only tested them for NB and COM-Poisson models since they have dispersion parameters. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Table 3: Goodness-of-fit measures for AHS data from different distributions and specifications. Number of parameters estimated (np), Akaike and Bayesian Information Criterion (AIC and BIC), and log-likelihood value (Loglik). |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | The COM-Poisson full model was the best among all distributions and the simpler versions of each distribution. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Figure 10 presents the regression parameter estimates and 95% confidence intervals by out- come and final model. We can see that the confidence interval amplitude is almost the same for all models, but slightly smaller for the COM-Poisson models over the competitors for almost all estimates for the Ndoc response variable; for the other response variables, we saw little differences. The point estimates were very close between Poisson and NB models, with a difference for the COM-Poisson model in some estimates, for example, freepoor, age, sex, illness, and chcond limited for Ndoc. We may relate this to the bias found in Figure 8. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Figure 10: Regression parameter estimates and 95% confidence intervals by outcome and final model for the Australian Health Survey (AHS) data. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | distribution), and ν is greater than 1 for all response variables and indicates underdispersion. The expected result would be φ and ν approaching zero, which results in an overdispersion of both distributions. However, as explored in subsection 5.2, this behavior may occur because of the variance of the random effect. For the COM-Poisson model, the only ν estimate which indicates overdispersion was for Nmed, which had a sample DI equal to 1.99 (small overdispersion). |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | We presented the correlation coefficient estimates and their SEs in parentheses in (1) for the COM-Poisson model. Among the 10 correlation coefficients returned, COM-Poisson had 6 significant correlation coefficients. The stars in the matrix represent significant coefficients at the 5% level. Even though we do not have a primary interest in interpreting each correlation coefficient estimate, it is important to know which of them is significant, because it may be related to a smaller SE. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | We can see an almost perfect significant correlation between Nadm and Nhosp, and a strong correlation between Nmed and Ndoc. We had also seen this pattern in Table 1. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | We presented the best model for each distribution in Table 5. Here, we included two models for the COM-Poisson distribution because they were equivalent in the intermediate models based on the adopted criterion. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Table 5: Goodness-of-fit measures for ANT data from the best parametrization for each dis- tribution. Number of parameters estimated (np), Akaike and Bayesian Information Criterion (AIC and BIC), and log-likelihood value (Loglik). |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | From Table 5 we can see that the best models were from COM-Poisson distribution; Poisson and NB models had similar logLik results. The COM-Poisson models had higher logLik and BIC, and smaller AIC than the fixed dispersion model. A logLik ratio test (LRT) between these two COM-Poisson models resulted in p < .00001 (χ41 = 132.84), which gives evidence in favor of the fully specified model. Therefore, we will present the estimates of the full models for each distribution. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Figure 11 presents the regression parameter estimates and 95% confidence intervals by out- come and final model for the first 12 response variables. We presented the same graphic for the remaining response variables in the supplementary material, Figures S1, S2, and S3, once we found similar patterns for all response variables. First, we can see that not all response variables share the same linear predictor (covariate feral mammal dung is not presented in the second, third and ninth response variables). Second, there were still some regression es- timates’ SEs that were not returned by the model and are presented by a hollow circle. It was necessary to make the distinction when the SE was returned and when it was tiny (filled circle, such as bare ground for COM-Poisson and response variables 1-8 and 10-12). |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Overall, the confidence intervals for the COM-Poisson model were smaller than its counter- parts and the point estimates were close among all models. The feral mammal dung covariate had the largest confidence intervals compared to the other covariates. There are still regres- sion coefficients that are very close to zero, suggesting that a better variable selection method may improve the model fit. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Figure 11: Regression parameter estimates and 95% confidence intervals by outcome and final model for ANT data. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | process is the same as a GLMM model. We used the TMB package to implement the model once it provides state-of-art C++ libraries that handle automatic differentiation, CppAD (Bell BM 2005), linear algebra, Eigen C++ (Guennebaud, Jacob et al. 2010) and parallel computation, BLAS (Blackford, Petitet, Pozo, Remington, Whaley, Demmel, Dongarra, Duff, Hammarling, Henry et al. 2002), among others. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | In order to evaluate the properties of the ML estimators, we conducted simulation studies for each distribution, considering three different values for the correlation parameter and four different sample sizes. They were all evaluated through average bias and confidence interval based on the average SE and coverage rate with a nominal level of 95%. For Poisson distribution, we achieved unbiased and consistent estimators for large samples with intervals for bias ranging at most between (-.2;.2), except for sample size equal to 100 and values for the parameter ρ. The coverage rate was close to 95% in all scenarios considered, varying between 90% and 98%. We evidenced a greater variability for NB compared to the Poisson distribution, especially because of the dispersion parameter φ in NB, necessary to model overdispersion. For NB distribution, we also achieved unbiased and consistent estimators for large samples with bias intervals ranging in most cases between (-.5;.5). In particular, we noticed a greater confidence interval width for the correlation and φ2 parameter estimates; and small bias for σ2 and ν2 parameter estimates. The coverage rate in most cases was equal to or greater than 95%; with a coverage rate below 80% for the correlation parameter when ρ = 0 and the sample size equal to 100. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | For the COM-Poisson model, the parameter estimators were neither consistent nor unbiased. The regression parameter was underestimated for β02 and showed no bias for β01. The corre- lation parameter ρ was always estimated towards zero: when ρ = −.5 it was overestimated, ρ = +.5 was underestimated, and for ρ = 0 it showed no bias. The standard deviation of random effect σ2 was overestimated while σ1 was underestimated. This behavior may be correlated to the dispersion parameter ν: when more variance was captured from σ2 less dis- persion was captured from ν2; on the other hand, when less variance was captured from σ1, more dispersion was captured from ν1. As most parameters were biased, the coverage rate was not close to 95% in all scenarios. For σ2, β02 and νr the coverage rate were between 70% and 90%; for ρ the coverage rate were close to 80% in 2 out of 3 scenarios (ρ = {−0.5, 0.5}). The other parameters, β01, σ1 and ρ when ρ = 0 had a coverage rate close to 95%. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | After that, the two datasets were analyzed by each model and variation of them: no cor- relation, fixed dispersion, fixed variance, and common variance for all random effects. The first dataset was from the AHS survey with five random variables and 5190 participants. According to the fit measures used, the COM-Poisson model provided the best fit. The SE of β and ρ estimates were similar among the COM-Poisson, NB, and Poisson models. The ν parameter captured 4 out of 5 underdispersed response variables and one overdispersed response variable, followed by a small σ. The COM-Poisson model produced more significant correlation values than its counterparts. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | The second dataset was the ANT, which contains 41 response variables that count for the number of ANT species at 30 sites in Australia. The multivariate response can be considered as overdispersed by the GDI. The COM-Poisson model was also the best model regarding AIC and logLik; the model with the best BIC was the COM-Poisson with fixed dispersion. In almost all comparisons, the SEs of the COM-Poisson model was smaller than the other models. The ν parameter was greater than 1 for all response variables, indicating underdispersion. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Therefore, we suggest using the MGLMM model framework for count data. In particular, the best results were obtained with the COM-Poisson model in two real datasets. The major advantage of it is the possibility of modeling all response variables at the same time and measuring the correlation between the random effects. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | for AHS data was cumbersome. It took 5 days to fit in a Debian GNU/LINUX 8 (jessie) 92 GB RAM server with an AMD Opteron 6136 processor using two threads. Improving the computational implementation or even using other frameworks are examples of future work. Improving the estimation procedure for the COM-Poisson model in this context is in high demand as well as understanding whether the COM-Poisson distribution can replace the NB distribution for overdispersed data sets. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Baydin AG, Pearlmutter BA, Radul AA, Siskind JM (2017). “Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey.” The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 18(1), 5595–5637. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Blackford LS, Petitet A, Pozo R, Remington K, Whaley RC, Demmel J, Dongarra J, Duff I, Hammarling S, Henry G, et al. (2002). “An updated set of basic linear algebra subprograms (BLAS).” ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 28(2), 135–151. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Bonat WH, Jørgensen B, Kokonendji CC, Hinde J, Dem´etrio CG (2018). “Extended Poisson– Tweedie: Properties and regression models for count data.” Statistical Modelling, 18(1), 24–49. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Brooks ME, Kristensen K, van Benthem KJ, Magnusson A, Berg CW, Nielsen A, Skaug HJ, Maechler M, Bolker BM (2017). “glmmTMB Balances Speed and Flexibility Among Packages for Zero-inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling.” The R Journal, 9(2), 378– 400. URL https://journal.r-project.org/archive/2017/RJ-2017-066/index.html. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | da Silva GP, Laureano HA, Petterle RR, J´unior PJR, Bonat WH (2022). “Multivariate generalized linear mixed models for underdispersed count data.” doi:10.48550/ARXIV. 2205.10486. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.10486. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Famoye F (2015). “A Multivariate Generalized Poisson Regression Model.” Comm. Statist. Theory Methods, 44(3), 497–511. ISSN 0361-0926. doi:10.1080/03610926.2012.743565. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Gibb H, Stoklosa J, Warton DI, Brown A, Andrew NR, Cunningham S (2015). “Does morphol- ogy predict trophic position and habitat use of ant species and assemblages?” Oecologia, 177(2), 519–531. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Hadfield JD (2010). “MCMC Methods for Multi-Response Generalized Linear Mixed Models: The MCMCglmm R Package.” Journal of Statistical Software, 33(2), 1–22. URL http: //www.jstatsoft.org/v33/i02/. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Inouye DI, Yang E, Allen GI, Ravikumar P (2017). “A review of multivariate distributions for count data derived from the Poisson distribution.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 9(3), e1398. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Kristensen K, Nielsen A, Berg CW, Skaug H, Bell BM (2016). “TMB: Automatic Differen- tiation and Laplace Approximation.” Journal of Statistical Software, 70(5), 1–21. doi: 10.18637/jss.v070.i05. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Lee Y, Nelder JA (1996). “Hierarchical Generalized Linear Models.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 58(4), 619–678. ISSN 00359246. URL http: //www.jstor.org/stable/2346105. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Mu˜noz-Pichardo JM, Pino-Mej´ıas R, Garc´ıa-Heras J, Ruiz-Mu˜noz F, Gonz´alez-Regalado ML (2021). “A multivariate Poisson regression model for count data.” Journal of Applied Statis- tics, 0(0), 1–17. doi:10.1080/02664763.2021.1877637. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 02664763.2021.1877637, URL https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2021.1877637. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2017). nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-131, URL https://CRAN.R-project.org/ package=nlme. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | R Core Team (2020). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foun- dation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Shmueli G, Minka TP, Kadane JB, Borle S, Boatwright P (2005). “A useful distribution for fitting discrete data: revival of the Conway–Maxwell–Poisson distribution.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 54(1), 127–142. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Wang Y, Naumann U, Eddelbuettel D, Wilshire J, Warton D (2020). mvabund: Statistical Methods for Analysing Multivariate Abundance Data. R package version 4.1.3, URL https: //CRAN.R-project.org/package=mvabund. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Winter B, B¨urkner PC (2021). “Poisson regression for linguists: A tutorial introduction to modelling count data with brms.” Language and Linguistics Compass, 15(11), e12439. |
Processed_Multivariate_Generalized_Linear_Mixed_Models_for_C.txt | Zeviani WM, Ribeiro Jr PJ, Bonat WH, Shimakura SE, Muniz JA (2014). “The Gamma- count distribution in the analysis of experimental underdispersed data.” Journal of Applied Statistics, 41(12), 2616–2626. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | The Gaia Alert System issued an alert on 2020 August 28, on Gaia 20eae when its light curve showed a ∼4.25 magnitude outburst. We present multi-wavelength photometric and spectroscopic follow-up observations of this source since 2020 August and identify it as the newest member of the FUor/EXor family of sources. We find that the present brightening of Gaia 20eae is not due to the dust clearing event but due to an intrinsic change in the spectral energy distribution. The light curve of Gaia 20eae shows a transition stage during which most of its brightness (∼3.4 mag) has occurred at a short timescale of 34 days with a rise-rate of 3 mag/month. Gaia 20eae has now started to decay at a rate of 0.3 mag/month. We have detected a strong P Cygni profile in Hα which indicates the presence of winds originating from regions close to the accretion. We find signatures of very strong and turbulent outflow and accretion in Gaia 20eae during this outburst phase. We have also detected a red-shifted absorption component in all the Ca II IR triplet lines consistent with signature of hot in-falling gas in the magnetospheric accretion funnel. This enables us to constrain the viewing angle with respect to the accretion funnel. Our investigation of Gaia 20eae points towards magnetospheric accretion being the phenomenon for the current outburst. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | short outburst timescales compared to the millions of years spent in the formation stage of these PMS stars makes these events extremely rare, although statistically each PMS star is expected to experience ∼50 such short duration outbursts during its formation stages (Scholz et al. 2013). The outburst durations, although short in timescales, are capable of delivering a substantial frac- tion of circumstellar mass onto the central PMS star (Vorobyov & Basu 2006). These events have been ob- served to span the entire age range of young stars start- ing from the embedded Class 0 sources to the Class ii sources (Safron et al. 2015). Based on the outburst timescales and spectroscopic features, these classes of sources have been classically divided into two categories: FUors which experience a luminosity outburst of 4-5 mag that last for several decades and containing only absorption lines in their spectra and EXors experienc- ing a luminosity outburst of 2-3 mag which last for a timescale of few months to few years and contains emis- sion lines in their spectra (Herbig 1977; Hartmann & Kenyon 1996; Hartmann 1998). The physical origin of the sudden enhancement of accretion rate is not yet clear. However, a variety of models ranging from ther- mal instability, magneto-rotational instability, combina- tion of magneto-rotational instability and gravitational instability, disc fragmentation to external perturbations have been proposed (Audard et al. 2014). To arrive at a general consensus about the physics behind such sud- den enhancement of accretion rates, a large sample of FUor/EXor sources are required to test the above in- stability models. However, only about 25 FUor/EXor sources have been discovered so far (Audard et al. 2014). Therefore, any newly discovered source provides an im- portant test-bed to probe the various physical aspects of episodic accretion and their comparison with the pre- vious sources. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | tometric and spectroscopic observations and combined them with the archival optical and infrared (IR) data to identify the outburst features of Gaia 20eae. In this paper, we present the initial findings of this source. Sec- tion 2 provides details on the location and distance of Gaia 20eae. Section 3 describes about the observations and the data reduction procedures in detail. In Sec- tion 4 we describe the results that have been obtained while in Section 5 we conclude by our understanding of the present outburst in the context of the FUor/EXor phenomena. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | Figure 1. Color-composite image obtained by using the WISE 22 µm (red), WISE 12 µm (green) and 2MASS 2.2 µm (blue) images of the ∼ 30(cid:48) × 30(cid:48) Field of View (FOV) around Gaia 20eae. The locations of Gaia 20eae, IRAS 19230+1506 and IRAS 19236+1456 (Retes-Romero et al. 2017) are shown by cyan circles. Locations of standard stars from the ZTF sky survey is also shown with green circles. Sub-panels 1(a) and 1(b) show the pre-outburst and post-outburst phases of Gaia 20eae in optical color composite image taken from SDSS and HCT, respectively. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | We have monitored Gaia 20eae photometrically in optical bands at 16 different epochs with the Hi- malayan Faint Optical Spectrograph Camera2 (HFOSC, 4 epochs) on 2m Himalayan Chandra Telescope (HCT), Hanle, India, ANDOR 2K CCD (9 epochs) on 1.3m Dev- asthal Fast Optical Telescope (DFOT), Nainital India, and FlareCam 1K CCD3 on 0.5m ARC Small Aperture Telescope (ARCSAT, 3 epochs), New Mexico4 from 2020 August to December. We have also obtained the near infrared (NIR) photometric data of Gaia 20eae during its outburst state using the TIFR-ARIES Near Infrared Spectrometer (TANSPEC; Ojha et al. 2018) mounted on the 3.6m Devasthal Optical Telescope (DOT), Nainital, India on the night of 2020 October 24. Table 1 provides the complete log of photometric observations presented in this work. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | In order to calibrate the photometry of Gaia 20eae at other epochs, we have used these equations with in- tercept estimated from a set of 7 non-variable standard stars (see Table 3). These non-variable standard stars were identified from the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) sky survey (Bellm et al. 2018) based on their zr band light curves (LCs7). Table 2 lists the magnitudes of Gaia 20eae in different filters in different epochs of our observations. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | We have used standard data reduction procedures for the image cleaning, photometry, and astrometry (for de- tails, see Sharma et al. 2020). We have derived following color transformation equations using the available mag- nitudes in different filters (i.e., APASS DR10 archive5 or Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) archive6) of all the stars in the frame at epoch JD = 2459141 (for optical) and JD = 2459144 (for NIR). |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | We have also obtained the photometric data from the time domain Gaia sky survey (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2016, 2018). Gaia sky survey maps the sky in G band to look out for the transients and regularly updates on their Gaia Alert Index website8. We have obtained the G band photometric data provided by the Gaia survey at its data archive9. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive11. We also ob- tained the recent photometric data in zg and zr bands of the observation made by the ZTF survey from Lasair 2.012, a community broker service to access, visualize and extract science data. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | We obtained the pre-outburst mid-infrared (MIR) magnitudes of Gaia 20eae from the Spitzer archive13 in 3.6 µm, 4.5 µm, 5.8 µm, 8.0 µm and 24.0 µm wave bands. Pre-outburst magnitudes of Gaia 20eae are also obtained from the W ISE archive14 in 3.4 µm, 4.6 µm, 12 µm and 22 µm wave bands. Outburst magnitudes of Gaia 20eae are obtained from the W ISE/N EOW ISE survey15 in 3.4 µm and 4.6 µm wave bands. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | calibration for the HFOSC due to its sensitivity to see- ing variations and centering errors on the slit. This is also important for the LRS2 IFU observation, since the night was hazy due to smoke from wildfires, resulting in a highly variable non-grey atmospheric extinction. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | We obtained NIR spectra of Gaia 20eae using the TANSPEC with its 0(cid:48)(cid:48).5 slit providing a R∼2700 on the nights of 2020 October 24 and 2020 November 6. Stan- dard NIR dithering technique i.e, obtaining the spectra at two different slit positions, was followed. The final spectrum of the object is obtained by subtracting the spectra obtained at the dithered positions to cancel the sky contribution. A telluric standard star was also ob- served immediately after the Gaia 20eae observations to remove the telluric features. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | We have used the standard tasks of IRAF17 to reduce medium resolution spectroscopic data. The task apall was used to extract the one dimensional spectrum. The extracted spectrum was then calibrated using identify task with the help of the calibration lamps taken imme- diately after the source spectrum. Finally, continuum task of IRAF is used to continuum normalize the spec- tra in order to measure the equivalent widths (EWs) of different lines. Standard IRAF tasks standard, sens- func and calibrate were used to flux calibrate our spectra. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | We observed a high resolution NIR spectrum of Gaia 20eae on 2020 September 12 using the Habitable Zone Planet Finder (HPF) (Mahadevan et al. 2012; Mahade- van et al. 2014) on the 10m HET. HPF covers the wave- length range of 8100 – 12800 ˚A, at a spectral resolution of R∼55,000. The H2RG up-the-ramp raw data cube was reduced to 1D spectra by the procedures described in Ninan et al. (2018); Kaplan et al. (2018); Stefansson et al. (2020). The wavelength calibration was done using a laser frequency comb calibrator as described in Met- calf et al. (2019). Barycentric correction was applied to all spectra with the values calculated using barycorrpy (Kanodia & Wright 2018). |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | In summary, we have monitored Gaia 20eae spectro- scopically at 10 different epochs with the HFOSC (6), TANSPEC (2), LRS2-R (1) and HPF (1). Table 1 pro- vides the complete log of spectroscopic observations pre- sented in this work. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | Figure 2. Upper panel: Historical Light Curve (LC) of Gaia 20eae in Gaia G, ZTF zg and zr, Johnson-Cousins B, V , R and IC and SDSS g, r, i and z bands showing both pre-outburst (white region) and outburst (shaded region) phases. Lower panel: Zoomed-in LC of Gaia 20eae in the outburst phase. The dark and intermediate brown regions represent the current plateau phase and the transition region, respectively. The vertical brown and magenta solid lines are representing the epochs when HCT HFOSC and HET HPF spectra were taken, respectively. Olive line denotes the epoch of TANSPEC spectroscopic observations. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | Gaia 20eae is named as ‘SSTGLMC G050.2584- 00.5077’ and classified as a candidate young stellar source (YSO) due to its red color in MIR bands us- ing the Spitzer photometry by Robitaille et al. (2008). Later on, this source was classified as Class ii YSO based on its IR spectral index (MC1-M15 in the Table 4 of Retes-Romero et al. 2017). Retes-Romero et al. (2017) also derived its mass as 1.5 M(cid:12) assuming an age of 2 Myr for a typical Class ii source and a distance of 1.3 kpc. As Bailer-Jones et al. (2021) have estimated a dis- tance of 3.2 kpc for Gaia 20eae from Gaia DR3, this would result in a different mass estimation. However, in the absence of direct measurement of AV around this source, it would be very difficult to derive its accurate physical parameters (e.g., age/mass). |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | a long quiescent period with minor fluctuations until 2019 October 28 (JD=2458785), after that, it began to transit to the present outburst stage. The pre-outburst magnitudes of Gaia 20eae were G ∼ 19.49 mag (2019 November 30; JD=2458818) and zr ∼ 19.40 mag (on 2019 October 28; JD=2458785). The mean G and zr magnitudes of Gaia 20eae during the quiescent phase were 19.14 ± 0.26 mag (from 2014 October 27 to 2019 November 30) and 19.46 ± 0.17 mag (from 2018 April 9 to 2019 October 28), respectively. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | As the quiescent phase LC of Gaia 20eae shows small scale fluctuations, we searched for periodic variability in it using the ZTF zr band data. Periodic variabil- ity has been reported in the PMS stars which is due to the rotation of the star having hot and cool spots on their photosphere. We have used the Period18 software, which works upon the principle of Lomb-Scargle (LS) periodogram (Lomb 1976; Scargle 1982), to determine the period of Gaia 20eae and to phase fold the LC. The advantage of the LS method is that it is effective even in case of the data set being non-uniformly sampled. We have also used the NASA Exoplanet Archive Pe- riodogram19 service for cross verification. The periods obtained in both the cases matched well. The period of Gaia 20eae thus comes out to be 2.1±0.004 days. The period detected in the quiescent LC of the Gaia 20eae might correspond to the rotational period of the star. This type of period is commonly observed in Class ii/iii type of YSOs as shown by Sinha et al. (2020). Figure 3 shows the phase folded LC of the Gaia 20eae during its quiescent phase. The amplitude of variation is of the order of 0.2 mag which is also typical of Class ii/iii type of YSOs (Sinha et al. 2020). |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | In the lower panel of Figure 2, we show the LC of Gaia 20eae in B, V , R, I, G, zg, zr, g, r, i, z bands in the outburst phase. The LC starts from 2020 March 3 (JD = 2458800) upto the latest data point on 2020 Decem- ber 9 (JD = 2459192). The LC of Gaia 20eae is peculiar in the sense that the rise to peak brightness consists of two parts: an initial slow rise from the quiescent phase starting from JD = 2458800 to JD = 2458995 and then a rapid rise to the peak brightness from JD = 2459014 to JD = 2459047, reaching maximum brightness on JD = 2459047, and then a slowly decaying phase (JD = It also shows small scale 2459047 to JD = 2459145). |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | Figure 3. Quiescent phase folded LC of Gaia 20eae as obtained from the ZTF zr band data. The period is deter- mined by using the Period software and also cross-matched with the NASA Exoplanet Archive Periodogram service. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | The maximum brightness in the current outburst phase in the zg and zr bands is recorded on 2020 July 16 (JD=2459047) as 17.02 mag and 15.09 mag, respec- tively. In the G band, the source reached the maximum brightness of 14.89 magnitude on 2020 August 26 (JD = 2459088). Thus, the current outburst magnitude am- plitudes are: ∆G = 4.25 mag and ∆zr = 4.37 mag. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | Figure 4. Left panel: The photometric SEDs of Gaia 20eae in quiescent (red dots) and active (cyan dots) phases. Right panel: Changes in SEDs, the observed magnitude differences (squares) are compared against pure dust-clearing events for Az = −2 mag (circles) and Az = −4 mag (triangles) and for RV =3.1 (filled) or RV =5.5 (open) dust laws. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | Table 4. Reddening invariant colors in the quiescent and the outburst phases of the Gaia 20eae. Nσ is the ratio of color change to the quadrature sum of measurement errors. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | The LCs in B, V, R and I also follow the trend of the ZTF and Gaia LCs. The quiescent phase J, H, and Ks magnitudes of Gaia 20eae are 14.67 mag, 13.36 mag and 12.16 mag, respectively as obtained from the UKIDSS DR10plus. During the present outburst stage, the J, H, and Ks magnitudes of Gaia 20eae as obtained from TANSPEC are 12.41 mag, 11.27 mag and 10.40 mag, respectively. This implies that the present outburst is similar to the FUor family of objects and is almost wave- length independent. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | observed magnitude differences of Gaia 20eae between its quiescent and active state by a blue curve. We com- pare the magnitude variations against ∆Az = −2 mag and ∆Az = −4 mag for RV = 3.1 and RV = 5.5 dust laws (see also, McGehee et al. 2004). From the devia- tion of the observed magnitude difference with the dust clearing events, we can conclude that the brightening of Gaia 20eae cannot be explained by the diminishing of the line-of-sight extinction, rather the enhancement of accretion rate is the likely cause. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | Using the multi-epoch data from the PS1 archive (quiescent phase), 2m HCT and 1.3m DFOT (outburst phase), we have also examined the evolution of the reddening invariant colors, ‘Qxyz’ of Gaia 20eae as it transitioned from quiescent state to the eruptive state. The reddening invariant colors have a generic form of : Qxyz = (x − y) − [(y − z)E(x − y)/E(y − z)], where x, y, and z are the observed magnitudes in each passband (McGehee et al. 2004). A color change having ∆ Qxyz (cid:54)= 0 indicates that the changes in SED is not due to pure dust clearing. The estimated reddening-invariant colors (for RV = 3.1) for Gaia 20eae as it transitioned from the quiescent state to the active state are listed in Table 4. The large change in most of the Qxyz values also points towards that the increase in the brightness of Gaia 20eae is not consistent with a dust-clearing event, rather an intrinsic change occurred in the SED. It is also to be noted that in the ‘Active Plateau Region’ of Gaia 20eae starting from JD=2549141, the value of QV RI is close to 0. This might imply that there was no change in the SED intrinsically in this duration. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | the spectrum of Gaia 20eae resembles a FUor, whereas in the NIR regime it is more or less similar to an EXor. Our medium resolution NIR spectra show several dis- tinct spectral features, most of them are in absorption. The gaps in the spectra represent atmospheric absorp- tion windows due to the broad H2O and OH bands. We could identify some prominent lines: Ca II IRT, He I at λ10830˚A and the CO bandheads. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | Radial velocity of Gaia 20eae: Due to lack of sym- metric photospheric lines in the high resolution spec- trum of Gaia 20eae, it is hard to estimate the radial velocity of the star. The chromospheric Fe I emission lines were found to be the most symmetric lines in the spectrum, and the line center of the Fe λ8387.77˚A at 20 km s−1 is taken as the stellar radial velocity with re- spect to the solar system barycentre in this study. The corresponding velocity in the local standard of rest ref- erence frame comes out to be ∼35 km s−1. It is to be mentioned that the peak velocity of the 13CO for the molecular cloud ‘MC2’ is 42 km s−1 with respect to the local standard of rest (Retes-Romero et al. 2017). |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | Figure 5. Evolution of the flux-calibrated spectra of Gaia 20eae during our monitoring period obtained using HFOSC on 2m HCT and LRS2 on 10m HET starting from 2020 August 29 to 2020 September 14 (upper panel). The lines used for the present study have been marked. The flux−calibrated spectrum show variation in the continuum level which is also present in the LC. Lower panel shows the normalized flux of Gaia 20eae obtained using TANSPEC on 2020 October 24 and 2020 November 06. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | have also tabulated the EW values of other lines during different epochs of the outburst phase of Gaia 20eae in Table 5. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | Outflow wind velocity of the Gaia 20eae is estimated from the blue-shifted absorption minima of Hα, Na I D and Hβ lines (Hartmann 1998). The estimated values of wind velocity by Doppler shift at different epochs in the outburst phase of Gaia 20eae are listed in the Table 5. The values show the variation from −630 to −203 km s−1. The mean velocity of the outflow wind velocity for Hα, Na I D and Hβ comes out to be −505 ± 62 km s−1, −356 ± 49 km s−1 and −339 ± 136 km s−1, respectively. The typical error in the outflow wind velocity estimation is ∼25 km s−1, therefore, a large scatter in its values can be attributed to intrinsic variation of outflow winds during the outburst phase. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | ing in a strong absorption signal at the local velocity of the gas. Figure 7 shows the very strong blue-shifted He λ10830˚A absorption signature in the high resolution spectrum of Gaia 20eae. On the red side, the absorp- tion profile extends to about +200 km s−1 and on the blue side, the absorption profile extends beyond −400 km s−1. Unfortunately, the high resolution spectrum beyond −400 km s−1 could not be measured since it falls outside the detector in the HPF spectrograph. Our medium resolution TANSPEC spectra in the panel (f) in Figure 6 shows the blue-shifted absorption extending to −513 km s−1 on 2020 October 24 and reducing to −493 km s−1 by 2020 November 6. Such strong blue- shifted He λ10830˚A triplet signatures are common in YSOs with strong outflows. Gaia 20eae is not an excep- tion. The reduction in the blue-shifted wing velocity of He λ10830˚A over a span of two weeks could be either due to change in the structure of the outflow winds or due to drop in the EUV - X-Ray irradiation. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | High resolution line profile shapes provide us direct measurement of the kinematics of the hot gaseous en- In this section we vironment of the accretion region. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | Figure 6. Evolution of the Hβ, Na I D λ5890/6˚A, Hα, O I λ7773˚A, Ca II IRT, He I, CO(2-0) and CO(3-1) lines during our monitoring period. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | Figure 7. High resolution line profile of the He 10830 triplet on 2020 September 12 showing a large blue-shifted component, likely originating in the strong outflow from Gaia 20eae. The absorption signal extends from +200 km s−1 on the red side, to beyond −400 km s−1 on the blue side (the profile is truncated at the detector edge in HPF). The vertical dashed lines show the location of the He 10830 triplets in the stellar rest frame. The narrow lines in the spectrum are telluric. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | Figure 8. Top-panel: High resolution line profiles of all the three Ca II IRT lines on 2020 September 12 showing a red- shifted absorption component. This is likely originating in the magnetospheric accretion funnel. The fainter step style plots behind the bold lines are the measured spectra. The bold curves are a 3 pixel smoothed spectra shown for clarity. The thin smooth curve is the double Gaussian composite fit of the emission at the stellar rest velocity and a red-shifted absorption at ∼+25 km s−1. The individual components are shown in dashed curves. Lower panel: Normalized spectrum using the continuum plus the fitted emission Gaussian com- ponent. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | Figure 9. Diagram of the classical dipole magnetospheric accretion funnel, and the region of the viewing angles that could potentially result in a low velocity red-shifted absorp- tion signature on top of the broad Ca II IR triplet emission line is shown in the diagram. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | Figure 10 shows the Hydrogen Paschen lines from Pa (14-3) to Pa γ (6-3). Only the lines which are not com- pletely lost in telluric bands are plotted here. The higher energy level Paschen lines are detected as broad absorp- tion lines extending from −250 km s−1 to +250 km s−1. However, in the lowest energy levels lines, Paγ λ10938.086 and Paδ λ10049.369, on top of the broad absorption component, we also detect an emission com- ponent at the core of the lines. The strength of this emission component decreases as we go to lines of higher energy levels. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | We detect multiple Fe I and Ti I lines in emission from Gaia 20eae during its high accretion phase (Figure 11). These lines typically originate in the active chromo- sphere, and are relatively symmetric when not blended with other lines. Hence, the peak positions of these lines were used to measure the 20 km s−1 radial velocity of Gaia 20eae. The widths of these emission lines are sim- ilar across the spectrum. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | Table 5. Variations of the wind velocities as obtained from blue−shifted absorption dips of Hα, Na I D and Hβ and equivalent width (in ˚A) variations of the optical lines in Gaia 20eae. The error in the equivalent width is estimated using the relation provided by Cayrel (1988). |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | Figure 10. Hydrogen Paschen lines from Pa (14-3) to Pa γ (6-3). The lines which are completely lost in telluric bands are not plotted. The narrow lines in Paγ λ10938.086 are telluric. The higher energy Paschen lines are detected as broad absorption lines starting from −250 km s−1 to +250 km s−1. We detect emission at the line core for the lower energy level lines Paγ λ10938.086 and Paδ λ10049.369 on top of the broad absorption component. The bold curves are a 3 pixel smoothed spectra shown for clarity. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | Gaia 20eae is the farthest discovered FUor/EXor type Class ii YSO undergoing outburst of ∼4.25 mag in G band. We have found that the present brightening of Gaia 20eae is not due to the dust clearing from our line of sight towards the source but due to an intrinsic change in the SED (warming of the continuum compo- nent). The LC of Gaia 20eae in the quiescent phase is showing a small scale fluctuation of amplitude of 0.2 mag and period of ∼2 days. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | Figure 11. High resolution line profiles of four Fe I lines and six Ti I emission lines on 2020 September 12. These lines are likely originating in the active chromosphere of Gaia 20eae. The fainter step style plots behind the bold lines are the measured spectra. The bold curves are a 3 pixel smoothed spectra shown for clarity. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | a newly discovered FUor) and V1118 Ori (1.05 mag month−1; Giannini et al. 2017, an EXor source). Such difference in timescales of the rise-rates, possibly, im- plies a different trigger mechanism in Gaia 20eae result- ing in the present luminosity outburst. Once it reached maximum brightness, it slowly started to decay from its maximum brightness with a decay rate of 0.3 mag month−1. The present decay rate is similar to that of bonafide EXor class of sources, EX Lupi and VY Tau, which returned to its quiescent stages in 1.5-2 years af- ter their maximum brightness state (Herbig 1977). The present decay rate is also similar to that of V899 Mon, which transitioned to a short quiescent state from its 2010 outburst state (Ninan et al. 2015). The decay rate of Gaia 20eae is surprisingly similar to that of V1118 Ori being equal to 0.3 mag/month thus pointing to the fact that a similar relaxing phenomenon is occurring in Gaia 20eae also. During the outburst phase, Gaia 18dvy is also showing small scale fluctuations having ampli- tude of ∼0.2 mag in all the bands. Such a short scale accretion variability has also been reported by Ninan et al. (2015) for V899 Mon. Similar fluctuations were observed in FU Ori, and may be due to flickering or in- homogeneities in the accretion disk (Kenyon et al. 2000; Siwak et al. 2013; Szegedi-Elek et al. 2020). |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | crease in disc turbulence as it transitioned to its qui- escent state after its first outburst (Ninan et al. 2015). Therefore, similar to V899 Mon, the present outburst of Gaia 20eae might be triggered by the magnetic instabili- ties in magnetospheric accretion. Gaia 20eae also clearly shows the decaying phase less than 15 months as well as CO band-heads in the emission. These features suggest that Gaia 20eae broadly resembles the EXor family of sources. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | Our high resolution spectrum shows a very strong blue-shifted He λ10830˚A absorption signature, which in- dicates a very strong outflow activity in Gaia 20eae. We have also detected a red-shifted absorption component in all the Ca II IR triplet lines, which could be due to the hot in-falling gas in the magnetospheric accretion fun- nel. As far as we know, this is the first reported direct detection of an infall signature in Ca II IR triplet lines in FUors/Exors family of objects. We believe that is strong evidence for the magnetospheric funnel origin of Ca II IR triplet lines in heavily accreting YSOs. Based on this, we have also constrained the viewing angle to be such that it is through the accretion funnel to the footprint on the stellar surface. |
Processed_Gaia_20eae:_A_newly_discovered_episodically_accret.txt | Gottingen. The HET is named in honor of its principal benefactors, William P. Hobby and Robert E. Eberly. The HET collaboration acknowledges the support and resources from the Texas Advanced Computing Center. We thank the Resident astronomers and Telescope Op- erators at the HET for the skillful execution of our obser- vations of our observations with HPF. CIC acknowledges support by NASA Headquarters under the NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship Program through grant 80NSSC18K1114. SS, NP, RY acknowledge the support of the Department of Science and Technology, Govern- ment of India, under project No. DST/INT/Thai/P- 15/2019. DKO acknowledges the support of the De- partment of Atomic Energy, Government of India, under Project Identification No. RTI 4002. |
Processed_Factors_Determining_Variability_Time_in_Active_Gal.txt | The relationship between observed variability time and emission region ge- ometry is explored for the case of emission by relativistic jets. The approximate formula for the jet-frame size of the emission region, R′ = Dc∆tobs is shown to lead to large systematic errors when used together with observed luminosity and assumed or estimated Doppler factor D to estimate the jet-frame photon energy density. These results have implications for AGN models in which low-energy photons are targets for interaction of high energy particles and photons, e.g. synchrotron-self Compton models and hadronic blazar models, as well as mod- els of intra-day variable sources in which the photon energy density imposes a brightness temperature limit through Compton scattering. |
Processed_Factors_Determining_Variability_Time_in_Active_Gal.txt | The actual relationship between emission region geometry and observed vari- ability is discussed for a variety of geometries including cylinders, spheroids, bent, helical and conical jet structures, and intrinsic variability models including shock excitation. The effects of time delays due to finite particle acceleration and radiation time scales are also discussed. |
Processed_Factors_Determining_Variability_Time_in_Active_Gal.txt | jet is Doppler boosted in energy and relativistically beamed along the jet direction (for a discussion of relativistic effects see Urry and Padovani 1995). The γ ray emission from blazars is variable (as it is also at optical, UV and X-ray energies). Relativistic effects also cause the observed variability time to be shorter than the time scale over which the emission changes in the jet frame. |
Processed_Factors_Determining_Variability_Time_in_Active_Gal.txt | The spectral energy distribution (SED) of blazars shows two broad peaks, the low energy peak extending from the infrared to the UV or X-ray region of the spectrum, and the high energy peak starting in the X-ray or γ ray range. The usual interpretation is that relativistic electrons produce the low energy part by synchrotron emission, and that the same electrons produce the high energy part by Compton scattering the low energy part and/or external photons to higher energies. The 3rd EGRET catalog of high-energy γ-ray sources (Hartman et al. 1999) contains around 70 high confidence identifications of AGN, and all appear to be blazars (Montigny et al. 1995, Mukherjee et al. 1997). Clearly, the γ-ray emission is associated with AGN jets. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.