Filename
stringlengths 22
64
| Paragraph
stringlengths 8
5.57k
|
|---|---|
Processed_Complex_shock_structure_in_the_western_hot-spot_of.txt | also bright, such as a shock upstream of and related to the terminal shock of the hot-spot. |
Processed_Complex_shock_structure_in_the_western_hot-spot_of.txt | and hot-spot and the wispy rings and dim emission pervading the rest of the cocoon. |
Processed_Complex_shock_structure_in_the_western_hot-spot_of.txt | lobe. In simple terms, if the jet terminates in a single steady shock, the pressure contrast between the hot-spot and the cocoon is given by phs/pcocoon ∼ jet physics lead Perley et al. to suggest that the Mach number may be as high as 40. |
Processed_Complex_shock_structure_in_the_western_hot-spot_of.txt | images of Perley et al. The tendency towards increasing contrast in the hot-spot and bar can be seen in the example contour maps of surface brightness for η = 10−2 and for the lower-M cases of η = 10−4 in Figure 17. |
Processed_Complex_shock_structure_in_the_western_hot-spot_of.txt | time series based upon the peak intensity in each frame divided by the long term mean. |
Processed_Complex_shock_structure_in_the_western_hot-spot_of.txt | on the variation of peak surface brightness (compare left and right columns of Figure 18). |
Processed_Complex_shock_structure_in_the_western_hot-spot_of.txt | thermal gas, or is an isolated blob of high-ϕ matter previously separated from the jet. |
Processed_Complex_shock_structure_in_the_western_hot-spot_of.txt | A bar may result from a variety of different kinds of annular or disk-like structures. |
Processed_Complex_shock_structure_in_the_western_hot-spot_of.txt | annular shock which also results in low presures at smaller r and z. The shock produces 90◦. |
Processed_Complex_shock_structure_in_the_western_hot-spot_of.txt | has been realised in three dimensional simulations of light supersonic jets by Tregillis et al. |
Processed_Complex_shock_structure_in_the_western_hot-spot_of.txt | section makes one side brighter than the other, but the image is still significantly curved. |
Processed_Complex_shock_structure_in_the_western_hot-spot_of.txt | indicated by the X-ray observations. On the basis of non-relativistic hydrodynamics, we therefore think it likely that the inclination angle, θ > 60◦. |
Processed_Vitamin_K_content_of_Australian-grown_horticultura.txt | with low, medium and high levels of PK were analysed in the verification study in triplicate. |
Processed_Vitamin_K_content_of_Australian-grown_horticultura.txt | samples of a control sample (Fapas® 21115, infant formula) were included in the analysis run. |
Processed_Vitamin_K_content_of_Australian-grown_horticultura.txt | passionfruit and to 1.0 g/100 g in almond and macadamia. Data were aggregated by family. |
Processed_An_Earth_Rover_dataset_recorded_at_the_ICRA@40_par.txt | Abstract— The ICRA conference is celebrating its 40th an- niversary in Rotterdam in September 2024, with as highlight the Happy Birthday ICRA Party at the iconic Holland America Line Cruise Terminal. One month later the IROS conference will take place, which will include the Earth Rover Challenge. In this challenge open-world autonomous navigation models are studied truly open-world settings. |
Processed_An_Earth_Rover_dataset_recorded_at_the_ICRA@40_par.txt | As part of the Earth Rover Challenge several real-world navigation sets in several cities world-wide, like Auckland, Australia and Wuhan, China. The only dataset recorded in the Netherlands is the small village Oudewater. The proposal is to record a dataset with the robot used in the Earth Rover Challenge in Rotterdam, in front of the Holland America Line Cruise Terminal, before the festivities of the Happy Birthday ICRA Party start. |
Processed_An_Earth_Rover_dataset_recorded_at_the_ICRA@40_par.txt | Recent developments in visual SLAM have shown that it is possible to generate detailed reconstructions of the surround- ings (e.g. [1] and [2]), although those reconstructions require depth-cameras. Creating navigation maps from a single front camera is more challenging, with the first successful attempt called MonoSLAM [3], followed by several more advanced methods like LDSO, ORB-SLAM, DROID-SLAM and SNI- SLAM [4], [5], [6], [7]. Some more advanced approaches, which integrate multi-view information and use neural net- works to replace depth sensors for depth estimation [8], [9], applying more constraints with additional features such as lines or planes [10], [11], or extracting more general features [12], [13], have shown promising prospects for real-time monocular SLAM methods. |
Processed_An_Earth_Rover_dataset_recorded_at_the_ICRA@40_par.txt | camera’s resolution is 540x360. In addition, the FrodoBot has an IMU, GPS and 4G SIM card onboard. The 4G SIM card provides a wireless interface, which allows teams all over the world to drive the robot around. |
Processed_An_Earth_Rover_dataset_recorded_at_the_ICRA@40_par.txt | Part of the challenge is creating a real-world dataset (> 2k hours), collected in several cities. Such large datasets are the way forward, as demonstrated with foundations models for robotics [14]. |
Processed_An_Earth_Rover_dataset_recorded_at_the_ICRA@40_par.txt | Such a dataset could be used in two ways. One solution would be to use it to train the robot to navigate with an end-to-end algorithm [15], [16], as demonstrated recently in the OpenDriveLab challenge by the team of Nvidia [17]. Yet, in that challenge, six high-resolution cameras provided a surround view, while the Earth Rover has to rely mostly on its front camera. |
Processed_An_Earth_Rover_dataset_recorded_at_the_ICRA@40_par.txt | The front camera can also be used for situation awareness, by perceiving the features that provide information for safe navigation. For safety, that pedestrians, bicycles and other traffic are detected [18]. For a first demonstration, a robust object-detection model such as YoloV8 would be a good choice [19]. Rich semantic priors can eliminate the interference of dynamic objects in pose estimation [20], [21]. In contrast, richer semantic methods, instance segmentation, multi-object tracking or more com- plex networks, further combine the estimation of the poses of dynamic objects and the robot itself [22], [23], [24]. In addition, the front camera can be used for visual odometry, to get an estimate of the Earth Rover’s movement, independent from the IMU estimates [25]. We can also integrate IMU and visual information to achieve more robust tracking and reconstruction [26], [27]. |
Processed_An_Earth_Rover_dataset_recorded_at_the_ICRA@40_par.txt | Fig. 3. The first row shows the target boxes obtained by YOLOX from the frames. The second row of images shows the dense depth maps predicted by LiteMono from a single RGB image. |
Processed_An_Earth_Rover_dataset_recorded_at_the_ICRA@40_par.txt | Terminal (see Fig. 2). The ORB-SLAM algorithm [5] would be a good choice for a first demonstration1, which can be extended in a later stage with more advanced methods [7]. it can be combined with satellite maps and street maps to Scene Action Maps [28]. The behavior learned to navigate on the Scene Action Maps, can be ported to other robots with cross-embodiment approaches [29], [30]. |
Processed_An_Earth_Rover_dataset_recorded_at_the_ICRA@40_par.txt | can be seen, and the fence at the right is clearly visible. The two persons approaching can also been seen, although the module shows some blurriness in the depth boundaries of the person. |
Processed_An_Earth_Rover_dataset_recorded_at_the_ICRA@40_par.txt | We have many interesting ideas how to extend the au- tonomous driving capabilities of the robot, but also realize that well ahead of the Earth Rover Challenge only the basic navigational and safety functionality will be active. For instance, dynamic-obstacle avoidance is hard; demonstrating this in a real-world setting will give insight in the strength and weaknesses. With human supervision this will be enough to record an interesting dataset [31]. |
Processed_An_Earth_Rover_dataset_recorded_at_the_ICRA@40_par.txt | Fig. 4. A part of the trajectory plot of ORBSLAM3 during operation on the output rides 21 sequence (see Fig. 3). Squares represent individual frames, with red indicating tracking failure frames and blue indicating tracking success frames. |
Processed_An_Earth_Rover_dataset_recorded_at_the_ICRA@40_par.txt | II. SITUATION AWARENESS The initial experiments1 the largest models in YOLOX [32] and LiteMono [33], YOLOX-X, and LiteMono8m, are used to demonstrate the performance of the largest real-time models on the dataset. Additionally, we use the state-of- the-art visual SLAM system ORBSLAM3 to process the information in the dataset. In the dataset, We selected the output rides 21 sequence from the FrodoBots-2K dataset2 for our experiments because this sequence is highly similar to the port environment, featuring sparse moving objects and repetitive textures near the port. Additionally, this sequence was recorded along the riverside using the same robot. |
Processed_An_Earth_Rover_dataset_recorded_at_the_ICRA@40_par.txt | In Fig. 4 the initial results of the ORBSLAM3 algorithm are presented, Blue represents good tracking, while red indicates tracking failure. It can be seen that ORBSLAM3 frequently experiences tracking failures throughout the entire dataset because of the repetitive textures along the river channel and drift trajectories due to dynamic objects in the scene. This demonstrates the significant challenges this dataset poses to existing real-time technologies and prompts us to reconsider the capabilities of current techniques. |
Processed_An_Earth_Rover_dataset_recorded_at_the_ICRA@40_par.txt | The top row of Fig. 3 shows the initial results of object detection with YOLOX-X. In the first three frames the two persons are correctly identified. Only in the last frame there are two False Negatives, when the two persons are to close by to be recognized. In addition False Positives can be seen in this frames. In the first frame from left to right, the flagpole is mistakenly identified as a person. In the second frame, the tree is mistakenly identified as a handbag. |
Processed_An_Earth_Rover_dataset_recorded_at_the_ICRA@40_par.txt | This paper outlines plans to record a new dataset for the Earth Rover Challenge at ICRA@40 in Rotterdam using the Earth Rover Zero robot. The dataset will enrich the current collection2 further which will allow to train SLAM and navigation algorithms on data collected in the real world. This recording will be unique due to the public (the visitors of the Happy Birthday ICRA Party) and the waterfront nearby. As a bonus, it will be fun for the ICRA participants to see a live dataset recording in action during their party. |
Processed_MediaRank:_Computational_Ranking_of_Online_News_So.txt | ABSTRACT In the recent political climate, the topic of news quality has drawn attention both from the public and the academic communities. The growing distrust of traditional news media makes it harder to find a common base of accepted truth. In this work, we design and build MediaRank (www.media-rank.com), a fully automated system to rank over 50,000 online news sources around the world. MediaRank collects and analyzes one million news webpages and two million related tweets everyday. We base our algorithmic analysis on four properties journalists have established to be associated with re- porting quality: peer reputation, reporting bias/breadth, bottomline financial pressure, and popularity. |
Processed_MediaRank:_Computational_Ranking_of_Online_News_So.txt | Table 1: Comparisons of MediaRank against other news ranking systems: NuzzelRank, NewsGuard, FeedSpot, and Al- lYouCanRead. Blank entries reflect lack of reliable informa- tion concerning methodology and coverage. |
Processed_MediaRank:_Computational_Ranking_of_Online_News_So.txt | Our major contributions of this paper include: (i) Open, inter- pretable quality rankings for over 50,000 of the world’s major news sources. Our rankings are validated against 35 published news rankings, including French, German, Russian, and Spanish language sources. MediaRank scores correlate positively with 34 of 35 of these expert rankings. (ii) New computational methods for measuring influence and bottomline pressure. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to study the large-scale news reporting citation graph in-depth. We also propose new ways to measure the aggres- siveness of advertisements and identify social bots, establishing a connection between both types of bad behavior. (iii) Analyzing the effect of media source bias and significance. We prove that news sources cite others despite different political views in accord with quality measures. However, in four English-speaking countries (US, UK, Canada, and Australia), the highest ranking sources all dis- proportionately favor left-wing parties, even when the majority of news sources exhibited conservative slants. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | In 2007, a very bright radio pulse was identified in the archival data of the Parkes Telescope in Australia, marking the beginning of a new research branch in astrophysics. In 2013, this kind of millisecond bursts with extremely high brightness temperature takes a unified name, fast radio burst (FRB). Over the first few years, FRBs seemed very mysterious because the sample of known events was limited. With the improvement of instruments over the last five years, hundreds of new FRBs have been discovered. The field is now undergoing a revolution and understanding of FRB has rapidly increased as new observational data increasingly accumulates. In this review, we will summarize the basic physics of FRBs and discuss the current research progress in this area. We have tried to cover a wide range of FRB topics, including the observational property, propagation effect, population study, radiation mechanism, source model, and application in cosmology. A framework based on the latest observational facts is now under construction. In the near future, this exciting field is expected to make significant breakthroughs. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are transient radio pulses of mil- lisecond durations that flash randomly in the sky. They were first discovered by the Parkes Telescope in 2007 [1]. De- spite being confused with rotating radio transients [2] and “perytons” [3] in the beginning, FRBs were finally deemed to be new astrophysical signals, thanks to a new sample of FRBs identified in 2013 [4]. Since then, the scientific com- munity has been increasingly focusing on them and theorist- s have been investigating the underlying physics. Knowl- edge regarding FRBs has taken a great leap forward since the landmark discovery of the first repeating FRB 121102 [5, 6] and further the identification of its host galaxy [7-9]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | In the following years, an increasing number of events have been collected [10], benefiting from the improved ob- servational techniques and new facilities. At the time of writing about twenty repeaters have been reported mainly by the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experimen- t (CHIME) [11-13] which has a large field of view and is extremely powerful in finding new FRBs. The interfero- metric arrays, represented by Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP), can accurately localize individ- ual bursts [14, 15]. The recent two breakthroughs in 2020 are even more exciting: the periodical activity has first been found for the well-known repeater FRB 180916 [16] and later for FRB 121102 [17, 18]. Moreover, the association of FRB 200428 with short X-ray bursts (XRBs) from a Galactic mag- netar SGR 1935+2154 has been confirmed [19-25], shedding new light on the origin of FRBs. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | As we deduce from the above milestones, the field of FRB is currently flourishing. The readers may refer to some previ- ous good reviews [26-29] for the progress till 2019. As this field is evolving fast and our understanding is being constant- ly updated, we feel it is a proper time for the latest review to appear. At the time of writing, we noticed a newly-published, well-written review article on the FRB radiation mechanism [30], and a brief introduction of recent observational progress [31]. With better data resolution and a larger sample of FRBs, we are now reaching a comprehensive understanding of this phenomenon. First, we get to know some individual bursts better, including their pulse structure, spectrum, polarization properties, and radiation mechanism. Second, the population research is also possible and we could study the classification, event rate and a few statistical properties of FRBs. Last, there is a growing trend that FRBs are treated as powerful probes of fundamental physics and cosmology. In this review, we will discuss all these aspects on the basis of the latest discoveries. This review is organized as follows. In Section 2 we in- troduce the basic observational facts of FRBs. Section 3 & 4 present the recent progress on statistical properties and pop- ulation study of FRBs. The possible radiation mechanisms and source models of FRBs are discussed in Section 5 & 6 respectively. The application of FRBs in cosmology is ex- plored in Section 7. Finally, we provide a summary and some thoughts regarding future prospects in Section 8. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | radio pulse is dispersed in the plasma, i.e., the high frequen- cy photons arrive earlier than the low energy ones. Second, the pulse can be broadened due to scattering with an extend- ed screen. Third, diffraction and refraction by turbulent gas make the radio signal scintillate occasionally. Fourth, these refractive plasma could lead to lensing effect. Fifth, some- times the absorption of radio emission is important if the plas- ma is dense enough. Last but not the least, the polarization property can be changed as radio wave propagates in the mag- netized plasma. We will introduce these propagation effects of FRBs respectively in the following subsections. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | which is several orders of magnitude higher than that of the normal pulsar radio emission. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | Figure 1 shows the dynamic spectrum (“waterfall” plot) of the first-discovered event, FRB 010724 (also know as “Lorimer burst”) [1]. The dispersive “sweep” clearly indi- cates that high energy photons arrive earlier than low energy ones. This burst has a total DM of about 375 pc cm−3, which exceeds the DM budget that could be contributed by electrons in the Milky Way, suggesting an extragalactic origin. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | Also, an error of trial DM (i.e., DMerr) with respect to the true value in dedispersion could cause additional smearing, which is expressed as ∆tDMerr = ∆tDM(DMerr/DM) [35]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | where H0 is the Hubble constant, Ωb is the cosmic baryon mass density fraction, E(z) = H(z)/H0 and F(z) = (1 + z) fIGM(z) fe(z) with fIGM being the fraction of the baryon mass in the IGM. Further, fe = YHXe,H(z) + 1 2 YHeXe,He(z), where YH, YHe are the mass fractions of hydrogen and helium, and Xe,H, Xe,He are the ionization fractions of intergalactic hydro- gen and helium, respectively. It is worth mentioning that the DMIGM term has been applied widely in cosmology, which will be discussed in detail later in Section 7. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | A radio photon can be easily scattered by the particles on its path. As a result, the moving direction of this photon could be changed to some extent. For an FRB event, a portion of its photons could be scattered and travel a longer way then arrive later than the unscattered ones, giving rise to a tail feature of the pulse profile. Usually, this tail appears as an exponen- tial decay, which can be well modeled by the scattering with a thin extended screen. The scatter-broadening time scales with frequency as τ ∝ ν−α and α ≃ 4.0 for the above screen [36]. However, if a Kolmogorov spectrum of scattering medi- um is assumed, the index could be α ≃ 4.4 if the minimum turbulence scale is smaller than the diffractive length scale [35, 37]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | Practically, the scattering timescale of an FRB is deter- mined by fitting its pulse profile. First we need to make a few assumptions on its intrinsic pulse shape (usually assumed a Gaussian shape), the receiver noise and instrumental smear- ing. Distinctions in assumptions lead to a diversity in FRB signal models. Then these models are applied to each indi- vidual FRB through a Markov-Chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) fitting of the pulse flux. Last, the goodness of fitting and the preferred model is determined by the Bayes Information Cri- terion. Ravi (2019) collected a sample of 17 Parkes FRBs and studied their scattering properties [38]. He found the typical scattering timescale τ ranges from submilliseconds to tens of milliseconds. Further, FRBs are underscattered in the plane of τ − DME, compared with the τ − DM relation of Galac- tic pulsars [39-41]. These have been confirmed by a latest analysis on a sample of 33 ASKAP FRBs [42]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | The scintillation of FRBs is akin to the twinkling of stars. However, the latter is caused by turbulent atmosphere of the Earth, while the former is due to turbulent plasma medium. Once the turbulent intervening plasma moves perpendicular- ly to our line of sight (LOS) with a velocity V, the interfer- ence fringes and diffraction fringes would vary according- ly and observer on Earth could be in the position of either maximum or minimum intensity. This leads to a variation of observed flux density, depending strongly on the frequency. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | Also, the variability of scintillation pattern depends on turbu- lence spectrum and the relative motion between the medium and observer. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | The physics of pulsar scintillation has been well reviewed before [43, 44]. Random phase fluctuations ϕ(x, y) are gen- erated when the plane waves pass through a turbulent scat- tering screen. The diffractive length scale rdiff is defined as the transverse radius at which the root mean square phase d- ifference is 1 rad [44]. If rdiff is larger than the Fresnel scale rF, which is expressed as rF = λD/2π with D being the distance between the screen and observer, the perturbations to wavefronts are weak and this is called the weak scattering regime. The observed scintillation timescale is the Fresnel timescale tscint ≃ tF = rF/V. In the opposite strong scat- tering regime (rdiff < rF), diffractive interstellar scintillation (DISS) plays an important role and the scintillation timescale is tscint ≃ rdiff/V. Detailed discussion of the dependence of DISS timescale on velocities of the source, scattering medi- um and observer was given by Cordes & Rickett (1998) [45]. They found that the scintillation bandwidth ∆νscint is relat- ed to scattering τ by 2π∆νscintτ = C1 where C1 is a factor of order unity. Combined with the previous discussions on τ, we get ∆νscint ∝ ν4. Scintillation phenomena that have been observed in a few cases like FRB 150807 and FRB 121102 match the predictions well [46, 47]. Note that the spectral structure of the recent Galactic FRB 200428 could be potentially explained by scintillation [48]. Besides, the re- fractive interstellar scintillation (RISS) may occur on a larg- /rdiff, of which the scintillation timescale er scale rref = r2 F tscint ≃ rref/V could be much longer than the FRB burst dura- tion [6]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | The electron density distribution on the lens plane will in- fluence the deflection angle to a great extent and differen- t lens models have been developed. The most commonly- adopted model is one-dimension Gaussian lens [50, 52] and more complicated light curves can be realized if other lens models are assumed [53, 54]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | Plasma lensing effect could be relevant for FRBs in various aspects. It can introduce an additional frequency-dependent delay of the arrival time so that the inferred DM should be ex- amined carefully [55]. The impact of plasma lensing on the observed FRB luminosity and spectrum has been discussed [52]. Moreover, the complex time-frequency pulse structure of FRB 121102 could be possibly explained by plasma lens- ing [56]. The downward frequency drift in a sequence of sub-bursts (“sad trombone” effect) can be attributed to plas- ma lensing. However, upward drifting is also expected in this scenario but has not been observed in the majority of FRB- s. Even though the sign of upward drifting appears for FR- B 190611 [57] and FRB 200428 [20], it happens much less frequently than downward drifting. Note that several inves- tigations have been done to explain the sad trombone effect in distinct scenarios. Within the framework of coherent cur- vature emission in the magnetosphere, Wang et al. (2019) proposed a generic geometrical model that EM waves of dif- ferent frequencies are emitted by bunched particles streaming along field lines of different curvature radii [58]. Alternative- ly, Metzger et al. (2019) suggested that the sad trombone ef- fect could be attributed to the deceleration of the blast wave, assuming the FRB mechanism is synchrotron maser emission [59]. A detailed discussion of this model can be found in Sec- tion 6.1. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | Ionized plasma is refractive that radio waves are deflected while passing through. The plasma refractive index is given by np = p/ω2. In many ways plasma lensing is anal- ogous to gravitational lensing, however, the differences be- tween them are also obvious. In general, gravitational lenses are converging and achromatic [49], while plasma lenses are diverging and highly chromatic [50]. If the diverging plasma lens is on the axis between the source and the observer, the observed flux will be in its minimum. However, this lens can also cause large magnification (caustic spots) if it lies offset. Therefore the variability of light curves is enriched due to the source-lens-observer geometry. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | The mathematical prescription of plasma lensing is very similar to that of gravitational lensing. The major difference lies in the formulae of effective deflection potential and a de- tailed comparison can be found in Wagner & Er (2020) [51]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | A positive RM means the magnetic field direction is towards the observer and inversely it can be negative. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | The polarization properties of FRBs vary from case to case. The repeaters like FRB 121102 and FRB 180916 are nearly 100% linearly polarized and have a flat PA curve (i.e., PA does not vary obviously with time) [12, 47, 64-66]. Note that the RM of FRB 121102 is the highest among all FRB- s (∼ 105 rad/m2) and is decreasing with time [64, 67]. The non-repeaters like FRB 181112 and FRB 190102 are usual- ly partial linearly or circularly polarized and their PAs vary significantly with time (named “PA swing”) [57, 68]. The polarization fractions are found to evolve with time for non- repeaters [57]. However, it remains questionable whether the difference in polarization favors the classification of FRBs by repeating or not. In particular, a recent observation chal- lenges this viewpoint, i.e., the repeating FRB 180301 shows diverse PA swings [69]. It is possible that with the enlarging of the FRB sample in the future, repeaters and non-repeaters are not so different in polarization. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | may also play an important role [73, 74]. FRBs can escape only if the optical depths τff and τSSA are less than unity. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | Early in 2020 the lowest frequency of FRB detection- s is still near 330 MHz for FRB 180916 [75, 76] and FR- B 200125A [77]. Very recently, searches conducted at even lower frequencies (i.e., 150 MHz by LOFAR) found a few new bursts for FRB 180916 [78, 79]. This means that the low-energy spectrum cutoff lies below ∼ 100 MHz. It is un- clear whether the low-energy cutoff is caused by absorption or intrinsic FRB radiation spectrum. However, a general con- straint on the intrinsic spectrum can be given for particular bursts [75, 80]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | The host galaxies of FRBs are crucial for understanding the environment and origin of FRBs. The first localized even- t is repeating FRB 121102 [7]. It was localized to a low- metallicity, dwarf galaxy with stellar mass (1.4 ± 0.7) × 108 M⊙. A radio continuum spectrum has also been found in this galaxy. The second localized repeating FRB is FRB 180916 [81], the host galaxy of which is dramatically different from that of FRB 121102. The stellar mass of this galaxy is about 2 × 109 M⊙ and the star formation rate (SFR) of the birth re- gion is about 0.06 M⊙yr−1. The vast difference between these two galaxies suggests that the host galaxies of repeating FRB- s span a large range. FRB 190711 has also been localized and its host galaxy is also distinct [82]. Recently, it has been i- dentified as a repeating FRB [83]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | The localization of non-repeating FRBs is a big challenge. FRB 180924 was localized to a luminous galaxy at redshift 0.3212 [14]. Using the Deep Synoptic Array ten-antenna pro- totype (DSA-10), Ravi et al. (2019) reported the localization of FRB 190523 [84]. These two host galaxies are similar to each other. The stellar mass is about 1010 − 1011M⊙ and the SFR is about < 2 M⊙yr−1. Several non-repeating FRBs has also been localized [15, 82, 85-88]. We list the properties of host galaxies in Table 1 and more information can be found in FRB host database 1). |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | where Emax is the maximumal energy and αE is the index of differential distribution dN/dE ∝ E−αE . The fitting results for different samples are shown in Figure 2. It is interest- ing that the value of αE is in a narrow range of 1.6 − 1.8 for bursts at different frequencies, which supports a universal en- ergy distribution for FRB 121102. Moreover, similar αE for non-repeating FRBs observed by Parkes and ASKAP is also found [110, 118]. This energy distribution is also similar to those of magnetar bursts [106, 111, 119, 120], and solar type III radio bursts [121]. A few works have discussed the en- ergy distribution across different sources [108, 122-125], and the detailed method is introduced in Section 4.1. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | where dL is luminosity distance, F is the burst fluence. Zhang (2018) suggested that it should be the central frequency νc here instead of the bandwidth of the receiver ∆ν [113], which is more reasonable since the FRB spectrum is unknown and the emission could extend outside the range of ∆ν. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | Several studies have been performed on the distribution of observed pulse widths. Wang & Yu (2017) found that pulse widths of 17 bursts of FRB 121102 show a power-law dis- tribution with an index of −1.95 ± 0.32 [106]. Using more bursts of FRB 121102 observed by GBT, a shallower index of −1.57 ± 0.13 is found [111], which is shown in Figure 3. The width distribution of FRB 121102 is consistent with that of magnetar bursts [106, 111, 119]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | The all-sky rate is very high for FRBs, typically within the range of 103 ∼ 104 sky−1 day−1. Different surveys give d- ifferent rates since their sensitivities and central frequencies vary [28]. Basically, the event rate density is more important since it is directly related to the source system. It depends strongly on FRB luminosity. A recent study suggests that the event rate density above 1042 erg s−1 is ∼ 3.5×104 Gpc−3 yr−1 [122]. The precise cosmological volumetric rate is waiting to be revealed since the FRB redshift distribution Ψ(z) is still largely unknown. Except for 13 FRBs that have been local- ized with identified host galaxies [9, 14, 81, 82, 84-87], the majority of FRBs are lacking in direct distance information. Several pioneering works have put constraints on Ψ(z) with current statistical properties of FRBs [107, 128-131]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | delay of Ψ(z) from SFR if an FRB is produced by compact binary mergers [107, 118, 133]. This delay effect has been taken into account for short GRB before [134, 135]. Also, other models such as a constant comoving density or Ψ(z) in proportion to cosmic stellar mass density have been discussed [131]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | The generic mathematical formalism that relates the ex- pression of Θ(Lν, z) with observational properties has been completed in Macquart & Ekers (2018b) [107]. Usually, the cumulative distribution of FRB flux density/fluences (known as log N − log S distribution) is devoted to constrain Θ(Lν, z). the slope of If most of FRBs are in our local universe, log N − log S plot should be −1.5 [136]. However, differ- ent surveys give different power-law indexes in a wide range [129, 130, 137-140]. Meanwhile, the cosmological ⟨V/Vmax⟩ tests of different samples deviate from 0.5, which disfavor an Euclidean geometric distribution [133, 141]. Furthermore, the DM distribution of FRBs can constrain Θ(Lν, z) due to the relation between DM and z in Eq. (7). Assuming the models of Ψ(z), several works have constrained the FRB luminosi- ty function, or equivalently, the enengy distribution function [108, 110, 118, 123, 128, 131, 142, 143]. Recently a Bayesian method has been applied to give both the best-fitting val- ues and error-bars of the parameters in Schechter luminosity function [110, 122]. Besides, the intrinsic spectra of FRBs can influence the detection rate, since the emission frequency in source frame differs from that in the observer frame due to cosmological expansion. This effect is embedded in a k- correction factor (1+z)−α if the power-law spectrum Lν ∝ ν−α is assumed [107, 113, 131]. There are a few works that have discussed the impact of index α [128, 131, 133, 143]. Howev- er, currently it is poorly constrained from observations except for some small samples [144]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | the original one, it may fall below the detection threshold. This has been implied by the repetition of FRB 171019, for which two fainter bursts by a factor of ∼ 590 than the origi- nal burst that have been detected [148]. It may be just a lucky case and we could probably have missed many faint bursts of other FRBs. Third, the repetition statistics could differ a lot for each repeater. The waiting times for the majority of FRBs may be much longer than those of the frequent repeaters like FRB 121102. This problem will be alleviated as the observ- ing time accumulates. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | These above lead to a debate: do all FRBs repeat [145, 149, 150]? There is no firm conclusion but some emerging clues seem disfavoring a single population. The burst mor- phology looks different for repeaters and non-repeaters. Re- peaters like FRB 121102 have wider pulse width and show complex sub-burst structures [11-13,56,151], while pulses of non-repeaters are usually narrower [13, 143]. If the temporal and frequency structure is caused by self-modulation during propagation [152], the circumburst environment of repeaters and non-repeaters should be very different. Further, the po- larization properties seem different, though not prominent in consideration of the presence of FRB 180301 [69]. Moreover, there are some differences in the mass and SFR of their host galaxies, however, a clear sign of dichotomy has not been found [15, 100]. Note that these clues suffer from a small number of repeaters. With more repeaters coming soon, bi- modal distributions are expected in these statistical properties if repeaters and non-repeaters are physically different. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | fraction will peak at a certain observing time and the peak fraction is less than 100% [153, 156]. The current total ob- serving time of CHIME may be still insufficient to bring out the peak. Also, the repeating fraction will decrease with the increasing redshift since the repetitions of FRBs with closer distances are easier to be detected [123,153]. This means that the DM distribution of repeaters should concentrate on a low- er value than non-repeaters. Observationally, this trend has not been confirmed yet since the number of repeaters is lim- ited. A bottom line is that the volumetric rate of apparently non-repeating FRBs exceeds those of candidate cataclysmic progenitor events [160], therefore, there are many underlying repeaters waiting to be discovered in the near future. How- ever, the existence of a physically one-off population can be confirmed once the direct association of an FRB with a cata- clysmic event is observed. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | has recently been disfavored since it predicts a wider activity window for higher frequencies [78]. Alternatively, there may be an asteroid belt surrounding the companion and the NS collide with them in a certain orbital phase [163, 171]. The second kind of models suggests that the periodicity is due to NS precession [172-177]. The NS could either undergo a free precession [172, 174, 175] or forced precession [173], while the latter may be caused by the surrounding disk [176, 177]. However, one important issue for precession models should be addressed properly: why are FRBs produced at a fixed re- gion on the NS surface? Instead of an NS, the precession of a jet produced by a massive black hole has been discussed [178]. Note that a third option that associates the periodici- ty with the rotation of a magnetar has been proposed [179], however, there is no evidence that such a slowly-rotating magnetar exists and is able to produce FRBs. The period- ical behavior is closely related to the radiation mechanism and source model of FRBs, which will be discussed in next section. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | The periodicity of FRBs is a new character discovered in ear- ly 2020. The repeat bursts of FRB 180916 arrive regularly with a period of 16.35±0.15 days [16]. More intriguingly, the activity window is found to be narrower and earlier at higher frequencies recently [78]. Further, a period of ∼ 157 days for FRB 121102 has been claimed by two different groups using different burst data [17, 18]. Currently, period finding has on- ly been performed to three relatively “bursty” repeaters (the above two together with FRB 180814), however, no signif- icant periodicity has been found for FRB 180814 yet [161]. Usually at least tens of repeat bursts are needed to achieve high enough confidence level after period folding process. This implies that there may be underlying periodicity for oth- er repeaters. The situation is very much analogous to that of repetition two years before. Future debate might arise like this: do all repeaters have a periodicity? One thing is obvi- ous that the unique period is distinct for each individual case, which may vary from seconds to years. Learning from repe- tition, we can do period modeling by assuming a distribution of period, which is left for future work. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | The radiation mechanism is always the core issue of a new astrophysical signal. It may take a while before we can figure out the mechanism of FRBs. However, we can learn a les- son from similar phenomena like pulsar radio emission and GRB. Very recently, Zhang (2020) gives a very nice review on this issue [30]. The high brightness temperature of FRBs from Eq. (2) implies that the radiation must be coherent. Ba- sically there are three main approaches to generate coherence (for a review, see [180]). The first one is coherent curvature emission by bunched particles (also known as antenna mech- anism) [95, 181-183]. The second mechanism is relativistic plasma emission by reactive instabilities (also called plasma maser in some literatures). The particles’ kinetic energy is transferred to plasma waves through a beam instability and is finally converted to escaping radio emission [184, 185]. The third mechanism is maser (microwave amplification by stimulated emission of radiation). The radiation can be am- plified if “negative absorption” is reached. The key point is that the number of high-energy electrons should exceed that of low-energy ones under certain physical conditions, which is called “population inversion”. Till now various versions of maser has been proposed for FRBs, including plasma syn- chrotron maser, vacuum maser and synchrotron maser from magnetized shocks [59, 90, 186-188]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | In vacuum, the trajectory of a relativistic electron in the pres- ence of a magnetic field can be decomposed into two com- ponents: a motion along the field line and a gyration in the perpendicular plane. The latter leads to synchrotron emis- sion and the former could produce curvature emission if the field line is curved (e.g., a dipole field geometry). Therefore, the realistic emission of relativistic electrons in a curved field can be generalized as synchro-curvature radiation, which is illustrated in Fig 5. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | If FRBs are produced inside the magnetosphere of NS where B > 109 G, the gyration damps very quick since the synchrotron cooling timescale is proportional to B−2. The electron moves along the field line and only curvature emis- sion is important [192]. However, outside in the low B region, both curvature and synchrotron emission can be effective and Eq. (33) should be applied. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | been discussed in detail by Yang & Zhang (2018) [95]. Here we list some of their important results below. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | where ωcoh ∼ (ρ/L)2ωL is a frequency boundary beyond which the emission becomes incoherent. Further, if we as- sume the electrons have a power-law energy distribution, i.e., Ne(γ) ∝ γ−p where γm < γ < γmax, the resulting radiation spectrum has a break at ωm ≡ ωc(γm) given by Eq. (36). The power-law index of the spectrum turns from 2/3 (for ω ≪ ωm) to −(2p − 4)/3 (for ω ≫ ωm). For more compli- cated scenario, a 3-D bunch with a half opening angle φ has been considered. If φ is larger than the angle of beamed cone, only part of the radiation by this bunch can be observed. This also leads to a spectral break from 2/3 to 0, at the frequency ωφ ≡ 3c/(ρφ3). |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | Taking all these above into account, the total radiation spectrum of a 3-D bunch filled with power-law distributed electron has a four-segments-broken-power-law shape, char- acterized by three frequencies ωL, ωm, ωφ. The indices of four segments change according to the relative values of ωL, ωm, ωφ and the complete analytical expressions can be found in Yang & Zhang (2018) [95]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | The theory of plasma emission was first proposed to explain solar radio bursts [199]. Later its relativistic version was ap- plied to pulsar radio emission [200]. Generally plasma emis- sion process includes two stages: Langmuir-like waves are generated by a beam instability and then part of the wave en- ergy is converted to escaping radiation [184]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | Coherent curvature emission by bunches has long been pro- posed as a possible mechanism for pulsar radio emission [193-195]. However, it remains controversial how the bunch- es could form effectively, and consequently some critiques has been put on this mechanism [196-198]. It seems unlike- ly to solve this leftover problem completely in FRB field but some possible ways could be explored. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | whether Langmuir-like waves through beam instabilities can be generated in the NS magnetosphere [185]. Second, usu- ally the growth rates for beam instabilities seem too small to allow effective wave growth [180]. In the case of FRB 121102, cyclotron-Cherenkov resonance condition requires unrealistically high beam Lorentz factors and the growth rate of Cherenkov instaiblity is too small [188]. Thus, plasma maser can hardly explain the emission of FRB 121102. For completeness, however, we list this mechanism here since it represents the second way of generating coherence. The liv- ing space is limited even it might be applicable to some par- ticular low-energy bursts. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | The function Φ(z) has a negative minimum value of ∼ −0.24 at the frequency νR∗ ≡ νp(νp/νB)1/2 [205]. For ν < νR∗, µ is always negative. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | This indicates that a significant fraction of electron energy is converted to the strong synchrotron maser emission. Note that |µ|L ≫ 1 is achieved only for a narrow range of frequen- cies, so the maser emission has a narrow spectra [204, 205]. Also, its typical frequency is lower than synchrotron self- absorption frequency [204]. In some circumstances, this plas- ma synchrotron maser could arise around GHz, thus being regarded as a possible mechanism for FRBs [186]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | where E = γmec2 is electron energy. Normally µ is positive but it can turns negative if the plasma is dense and relativistic. [ > 0, i.e., the energy dis- A direct requirement is that d dE tribution of electrons grows faster than E2. This means that population inversion is necessary. Further we need to explore at which frequencies this negative absorption is significant. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | For synchrotron emission in vacuum, if Eq. (35) is substi- tuted into Eq. (43), we always have d[E2dP/dω] > 0 and thus µ > 0. However, we should notice that Eq. (35) has been in- tegrated over solid angle. Actually, the synchrotron radiation power is angular-dependent and dP dωdΩ is relevant. At some certain observing angle θ, the self-absorption coefficient can be negative [187, 188, 206]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | This cross section is negative only if both θ > 2/γ and ν/νc ≫ (γθ)−3 are satisfied [187, 206]. The maser emission can be observed outside the 1/γ emission cone of the rela- tivistic electrons. For lower frequencies ν/νc ≪ (γθ)−3 or in the 1/γ cone the cross section turns positive with a larger ab- solute value [187]. This implies that the distribution of pitch angles should be narrower than 1/γ, otherwise any photon will be preferentially absorbed by a particular electron whose emission cone wraps the photon’s moving direction. Howev- er, it is unclear whether such narrow pitch angle distribution can be achieved. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | Other than vacuum synchrotron maser, the vacuum curva- ture maser inside the magnetosphere has been considered. S- ince the expressions of emissivity for synchrotron and curva- ture radiation are very similar, the above procedure of calcu- lation has been repeated [188]. The curvature self-absorption cross section could be negative for θ . (2γ2)−1. However, since electrons move along curved field lines in the magne- tosphere, the curvature photons emitted by an electron will be inevitably absorbed by electrons on other field lines since their intersection angles are large. Therefore, it is unlikely for vacuum curvature maser to be responsible for FRBs. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | Relativistic perpendicular magnetized shocks has been stud- ied extensively in literatures. Traditionally, a set of conserva- tion equations of physical quantities between upstream and downstream plasma can be written. However, these macro- scopic conservation laws fall short of describing the mi- croscopic behavior of the plasma, such as the distribution- s of particle momentum, energy partition between different species and so on. These kinetic issues shall be addressed by collisionless plasma physics. The development of particle- in-cell (PIC) simulations since early 1990s greatly helps un- derstand the plasma properties. In principle, particles reflect- ed at magnetized shock front will achieve bunching in gyra- tion phase and synchrotron maser (or relativistic cyclotron) instability will develop [208]. Strong coherent EM signal can be produced and the reabsorption of these cyclotron waves serves as the main heating mechanism of downstream plas- ma [209]. This EM signal occurs before the radiation from heated downstream particles so that it is called a precursor. The FRB emission is probably just this kind of EM precursor [90]. Here we will revisit the results of 1-D PIC simulations and briefly introduce the underlying physics. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | where T2 is downstream temperature. Substituting Eq. (59) we can express this ratio as a function of σ and ˆΓ. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | where " is the dielectric tensor. Sustituting Eq. (70), the four components of " can be expressed in analytical forms [209]. The dispersion relation shows two unstable branches corre- sponding to EM waves and magnetosonic waves [209, 212]. It has been demonstrated that the growth of EM waves can be very effective at low harmonics thus a synchrotron maser (EM precursor) can be produced [209, 212]. Simultaneous- ly, the energy spectrum of downstream pairs is heated to a relativistic Maxwellian distribution [209, 210]. Note that the above discussion can be generalized to an ion-pair plasma though the expression for " becomes more complicated. In the presence of ions, a high-energy non-thermal tail of ener- gy spectrum of pairs appears, which is due to the absorption of the ion cyclotron waves [212, 213]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | Simulation results show that fζ,η ≪ fξ [210], and we are only fξ has a peak value around interested in the EM precursor. 10% at σ ∼ 0.1, and increasing σ leads to decreasing fξ. For very high magnetization σ ≫ 1, fξ has an asymptotic form of 7 × 10−4/σ2 [211]. The spectrum of EM precursor peaks at ωpeak ≃ 3ωp max[1, σ] (in the post-shock frame) and is relatively narrow-banded with ∆ω/ωpeak ∼ a few [211]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | To conclude this section, we should be aware of the fact that above mechanisms do not include all, since more than a dozen of pulsar radiation models have been proposed and developed. It is unclear which mechanism would work for FRBs. According to the site where these mechanisms take place, they are classified into two types: close-in (i.e., insid- e the NS magnetosphere) and far-away (i.e., outside the NS magnetosphere) (see the latest review of Zhang (2020) [30]). A few works have been devoted to discuss the applicability of different mechanisms to individual bursts. As an example, a critical analysis on radiation mechanism of FRB 121102 has been nicely performed by Lu & Kumar (2018) [188]. They concluded that given the properties of FRB 121102, plasma maser and vacuum curvature maser have been exclud- ed. Vacuum synchrotron maser may survive, but needs fine- tuning. Plasma synchrotron maser and synchrotron maser from magnetized shocks suffer from the problem of low ra- diation efficiency. Coherent curvature emission satisfies the observations best, however, the relevant magnetic reconnec- tion physics is highly uncertain. For other FRBs with lower energies, the constraints on radiation mechanism may be to- tally different. For recent FRB 200428, models based on both coherent curvature emission and synchrotron maser emission have been applied successfully [124, 214-216]. However, di- verse PA swings of FRB 180301 clearly favor the close-in mechanism [69]. One thing that we know from the GRB field is that the radiation mechanism is the kernel of FRB physic- s and it is not easy to be made clear completely. Similar to GRBs, the controversy on radiation mechanism may last a while before reaching a final conclusion. A good mechanism needs to explain FRB energetics, duration, spectrum, pulse structure, polarization, repetition and periodicity, hence plen- ty of work should be done in the future. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | The origin of FRBs has been an outstanding issue ever since its discovery. Various source models have been proposed, most of which involve compact objects (see [217] for a the- ory catalogue). Different models predict different EM coun- terparts and sometimes multi-messenger signals [218]. Note some progenitor models are catastrophic and can only be ap- plied to one-off FRBs. The recent discovery of FRB 200428 has confirmed that magnetars are capable of producing FRB- s. Moreover, localized FRBs seem to be consistent with mag- netar progenitors in host galaxy properties [101, 154]. Al- though it is still early to say that all FRBs are from mag- netars [102], at this time magnetar models attract the most attention of the community. In this section we will introduce four well-developed magnetar models and their predictions [59, 171, 219, 220]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | is based on syn- The model proposed by Metzger et al. chrotron maser emission from magnetized shocks, which is far away from the central magnetar. The picture is shown in Figure 6. A magnetar is embedded in a supernova (SN) envi- ronment and the wind blows a bubble (nebula) behind the SN ejecta. Matter ejected during magnetar flare is composed of a highly relativistic shell and a subrelativistic ion tail. The rela- tivistic ejecta shell collides with the leftover ion tail from the previous flare and forward-reverse shock system is formed. The ion tail is magnetized with assumed σ ∼ 0.1 − 1, which is beneficial for producing synchrotron maser by the forward shock. Assuming the ion tail has a radial density profile next ∝ r−k, the dynamical evolution is then quite similar to that of GRB afterglow [221]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | This naturally predicts the down-drifting of the FRB emis- sion. Since there is strong ICS absorption, the effective radi- ation efficiency is even lower than maser efficiency of ∼ 10−3, typically ∼ 10−6−10−5. Another prediction is that the acceler- ated electrons in the downstream can produce a high-energy (keV-MeV) counterpart. Its duration is of order ∼ millisec- onds, and the luminosity and spectrum highly depends on the flare parameters. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | This model has been successfully applied to FRB 200428 in different details [215, 216, 223, 224]. The observed low ef- ficiency Eradio/EX ∼ 10−5 of FRB 200428 matches the mod- el prediction well. The duration and luminosity of the as- sociated XRBs can be explained [215]. Especially, by in- troducing a density-jump structure of upstream medium, the double-peaked character, luminosity ratio and emission fre- quency of two radio pulses can be well explained [216]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | Moreover, three X-ray peaks are expected [216], which is also consistent with observation [22, 23]. However, obser- vationally the X-ray peak energy seems to increase with time [23], which needs further consideration. Non-thermal accel- eration of electrons can be realized if sufficient ions exist in the downstream [212]. The superposition of two components could change the peak energy. Besides, the XRBs may sim- ply have a different origin from FRB [124, 223, 224]. This model also requires a large amount of baryonic matter (about 0.005 solar mass), which may be larger than the typical mass of a magnetar outer crust [224]. Note that this model needs upgrade in order to explain the complex PA behaviour of FR- B 180301, since the magnetic field configuration is basically fixed and a flat PA curve is expected. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | The radiation mechanism in Beloborodov model is also syn- chrotron maser emission, however a main difference from Metzger et al. (2019) is the upstream medium. In this model, the emission region is also far away from a central magnetar. The ejecta shell should decelerate in the long-lasting wind before it can hit the ion tail. A magnetized shock is likely to form in the wind instead of the ion tail, because the magneti- zation should be very low for the tail. Synchrotron maser can be produced as the blast wave sweeps the cold wind, which is illustrated in Figure 7. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | Different from Metzger et al. (2019) scenario, He found that ICS is not important so that this intrinsic νpk is responsible for the observed peak frequency. Also, Eq. (79) predicts a differ- ent downward drifting rate compared to Eq. (76). These dis- tinctions originate from different physical conditions of up- stream medium. Note that due to high magnetization of the wind, a very low maser efficiency is also expected in this s- ∼ 10−5 − 10−6. Moreover, FRB cenario, EFRB/E ∼ 10−3 σ−2 w emission is almost 100% linearly polarized with polarization direction being aligned to the magnetar rotation axis since the helical wind is nearly toroidal. This is also disfavored by the observation of FRB 180301. A bubble structure can be formed behind the slow ion tail (Figure 7), and a strong op- tical flash of duration ∼ 1 s is predicted as the shock sweeps the bubble. However, no optical emission has been detected for FRB 200428 and all other events yet. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | current required by the wave. This means charge starvation occurs at R > Rc. Strong parallel electric field forms and accelerates electron-positron pairs. The counter-streaming of pairs leads to two-stream instability and then bunch forma- tion. Afterwards, FRBs are produced by the coherent cur- vature radiation from bunches. This model is illustrated in Figure 8. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | association with XRBs is also expected [124, 214, 225, 226]. The derived spectra from CHIME and STARE2 bursts can be explained [214]. Using the luminosity L ∼ 3 × 1038 erg s−1, the emission radius can be constrained as Rc/R∗ ∼ 20(δB10/λ⊥,4)6/11 [124]. Note that these models pre- dict that X-rays should appear earlier than an FRB, since the FRB is not yet produced until Alfv´en waves reach Rc. How- ever, observationally there is a time lag of the X-ray peak respect to the radio peak, which is about several milliseconds [22, 23]. Further work needs to be done to explain this time lag as well as the non-thermal component of X-ray emission [22]. Also, the radio pulses should be able to break out from XRB fireballs [227]. |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | Figure 8 The schematic picture of Kumar & Boˇsnjak 2020 model. (Adapt- ed from [220]). |
Processed_The_Physics_of_Fast_Radio_Bursts.txt | where and hereafter the NS radius RNS = 106 cm is adopted. These simple estimates of ∆t and ˙EG are well consistent with the observations of FRBs. This is why asteroid-NS collisions have been proposed as an origin model of FRBs [171, 229]. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.