Filename
stringlengths 22
64
| Paragraph
stringlengths 8
5.57k
|
|---|---|
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | This paper is structured as follows. In Sect. 2 we introduce the four theories of gravity and dark energy that we consider. In Sect. 3 we cover all the various nonlinear redshift-space power spectrum models and approximations. In Sect. 4 we present the N-body simulations which we then use to quantify the validity of the various theoretical choices in Sect. 5. We summarised these findings and our conclusions in Sect. 6. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | where in the second equality we have used the linear version of Eq. (5). This can now clearly be both time and scale-dependent, as in f (R) gravity (see Sect. 2.4). |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | where the gravitational potential, Φ, appears in the time-time component of the metric. To express the continuity and Eu- ler equations, we use the rescaled CDM velocity divergence, θ (cid:66) ∇ · v/(a H), and the CDM density contrast, δ (cid:66) δρ/ρ, where ρ and δρ are respectively the energy density background and per- turbations. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | where the functions γ2 and γ3 are additional kernels coming from higher-order scalar field interactions in the Klein–Gordon equation (see Koyama et al. 2009, for example). For ΛCDM, we have µ(k, a) = 1 and Ξ = γ2 = γ3 = 0. We now look at the forms of these equations for various theories beyond-ΛCDM. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | where w0 and wa are constants. This form is essentially the first order Taylor expansion of w(a) about the present time, where we have chosen the present day scale factor to be a = 1. Taking only the first order Taylor expansion also implies we assume the equa- tion of state is slowly evolving. Eq. (11) effectively changes the background expansion H but leaves all other functional modifi- cations to ΛCDM at their ΛCDM values, that is µ(k, a) = 1 and Ξ = γ2 = γ3 = 0. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | Dark Scattering is an interacting dark energy model in which dark energy exchanges momentum with dark matter without en- ergy exchange (Simpson 2010; Pourtsidou et al. 2013; Pourtsi- dou & Tram 2016; Baldi & Simpson 2015, 2017; Bose et al. 2018a). The modifications to Eq. (10) are given by µ(k, a) = 1 and γ2 = γ3 = 0. On the other hand, we have a coupling be- tween dark matter and dark energy perturbations which appears in the Euler equations for each species (Simpson 2010; Baldi & Simpson 2015). |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | In this work we consider the specific form for f (R) proposed by Hu & Sawicki (2007). This model is representative of the class of models exhibiting the Chameleon mechanism (Khoury & Welt- man 2004), which screens in a phenomenologically distinct way to Vainshtein screening. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | where ξ (cid:66) σD/(mcc2). Here mc is the dark matter particle mass and σD is the cross-section of the interaction. ξ is treated as a free parameter of the theory. It is positive (or zero) and proportional to the strength of the modification to ΛCDM, with ΛCDM being recovered for ξ → 0 or w → −1. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | The Dvali–Gabadadze–Porrati (DGP) model has been intro- duced by Dvali et al. (2000) and describes a model where mat- ter lives on a four-dimensional brane which is embedded in a five-dimensional Minkowski background. This model is repre- sentative of the class of models exhibiting the Vainshtein mech- anism, which screens additional scalar field-sourced forces at small physical scales (Vainshtein 1972). |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | Here we set f0 = c2| fR0|/H2 0, where fR0 is the value of fR = d f (R)/dR today, which gauges the strength of the modification to GR. The GR-limit is given by fR0 → 0. As with the DGP case, we also assume a ΛCDM background expansion, H. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | When mapping the underlying theories described in the previ- ous section to the observable quantity of interest, there are sev- eral choices one can make. This range of choices expands sig- nificantly when we wish to model scales where nonlinearities become important. In this section, we present a number of such choices which we test to varying degrees against N-body simu- lations in Sect. 5. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | We refer the reader to Bose & Koyama (2016); Taruya et al. (2010) for expressions for A(k, µ), B(k, µ), and C(k, µ). These terms come from higher-order interactions between the density and velocity perturbations. We give their explicit forms in terms of the kernels defined in Eq. (3) in Appendix A. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | Equation (29) performs poorly when modelling nonlinear redshift-space effects. In particular, it does not capture the fingers-of-god (FoG) effect, caused by the large positional distor- tions of measured objects towards the centres of potential wells, coming from their high peculiar velocities. Higher-order pertur- bation theory (higher than third order), has been shown to have poor convergence at the level of the power spectrum (see, for example, Carlson et al. 2009), and is also very computationally expensive. To move further into the nonlinear regime, a number of proposals have been made in the past decade which modify Eq. (29) by introducing new degrees of freedom, or nuisance pa- rameters, quantifying our uncertainty on nonlinear effects. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | We consider two prominent such proposals, both of which have been applied in the biggest galaxy survey to date, the BOSS survey (Beutler et al. 2017; Ivanov et al. 2020; D’Amico et al. 2020; Carrilho et al. 2023). Both of these can also be computed with a number of fast public codes, discussed next. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | We summarise the codes in Table 1 along with relevant imple- mentations. MG-Copter is by far the slowest, needing to solve eight sets of Eqs. (5, 6) for each external mode k to find the per- turbative kernels up to third order. More quantitatively, to com- pute the first two multipoles of Eq. (29) in ΛCDM at fifty values of k in the range [0.01, 0.3] h Mpc−1, it takes roughly 45 s on a MacBook Pro 2018 model. By comparison, PBJ and PyBird only need to compute a set of products on a fixed grid by using the FFT method, which allows them to produce the same result in roughly 20 ms. Of course, this assumes a specific scale de- pendence of the perturbative kernels, which may not be known or even analytically available. This is not true for MG-Copter which only requires the specification of H, µ, γ2, γ3 and Ξ. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | This mapping was obtained after imposing that the monopole and the quadrupole of the two different expressions used for the counterterm, Eqs. (32, 33), have to be the same respectively. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | We have performed validation of these codes both in real (see Eq. (26)) and redshift space (see Eq. (29)) to sub-percent precision for ΛCDM, w0waCDM, nDGP, and Dark Scattering (see Appendix C for some of these comparisons). Addition- ally, MG-Copter, PBJ and PyBird have been validated inde- pendently against large N-body simulations in a number of pa- pers: see Bose & Koyama (2016); Bose et al. (2017, 2018a) for MG-Copter, Oddo et al. (2021); Carrilho et al. (2021); Tsedrik et al. (2023) for PBJ and Nishimichi et al. (2020); D’Amico et al. (2020) for PyBird. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | Within the Euclid collaboration, both PBJ and PyBird are being used to fit measurements from the Flagship simulation (Potter et al. 2017), with results to be presented in a series of pa- pers. Finally, PBJ has been ported to the Euclid likelihood code, named CLOE, and will be used to perform the official analysis of the spectroscopic sample for ΛCDM. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | ctr(k, µ) = −2k2 Pδδ ˜Ps This model has therefore a total of three nuisance parameters at the dark matter level, {˜c0, ˜c2, ˜c4}, with dimensions h−2 Mpc2. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | This form has been shown to be good at describing nonlinear effects (see for example Bose et al. 2020). This model then has a single nuisance parameter at the dark matter level, {σv}, with units h−1 Mpc, which represents an effective velocity dispersion, not to be confused with the linear estimate given in Eq. (30). |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | The next step to connect theory with the spectroscopic observ- able is to translate the dark matter spectrum to that of galaxies, which are biased tracers of the CDM distribution. As a proxy, one can consider the CDM halo power spectrum. This can be modelled incorporating an appropriate bias model. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | Notes. We show each code’s method of solving for the SPT kernels (see main text for more details), the computational speed (in order of magnitude in ms) and available modelling. ‘EdS’ and ‘USA‘ subscripts indicate only the Einstein–de Sitter and Unscreened approximations are available for that model (see Sect. 3.6). Here ‘DS’ stands for Dark Scattering and ‘WnW’ stands for Wiggle-no-Wiggle (see Sect. 3.4). We note that MG-Copter only supports an EdS implementation of the WnW - EFTofLSS model. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | In this work we set ϵ0 = ϵ2 = 0 and only consider the constant stochastic term, N, as done in the flagship BOSS analysis (Beut- ler et al. 2017) and in Ivanov et al. (2020). We have checked that the addition of ϵ0 does not significantly improve the fits to the simulations. ϵ2 however was found to improve the modelling significantly and has been included in some EFTofLSS-BOSS analyses (for example D’Amico et al. 2020). We have indeed checked that the goodness-of-fit to selected simulations does im- prove by including ϵ2. Despite this, we choose to omit it in order to keep the complexity of the model minimal, which should not affect relative differences between ΛCDM and beyond-ΛCDM scenarios. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | where the potentials ˜Φ and ˜Φv are defined as ˜Φ = ∇−2δ, ˜Φv = −∇−2 (θ/ f ). We have also defined ∇i j (cid:66) ∇i∇ j and ∇2 (cid:66) ∇i∇i. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | The term in square brackets is what we get from taking the en- semble average of the redshift space halo density perturbation in Eq. (38). |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | We have also included the nonlinear corrections coming v) = from the EFTofLSS and TNS. In the EFTofLSS, DFoG(k2µ2σ2 1 and the counterterms Ps ctr(k, µ) are given by Eqs. (32, 33) ctr(k, µ) = 0 while for PBJ and PyBird respectively. In TNS, Ps DFoG(k2µ2σ2 v) is given by Eq. (37). Further, in the TNS case we do not include the last two terms of Eq. (29), in accordance with Taruya et al. (2010). |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | where we now have included the linear bias contributions ex- plicitly for the 1-loop spectra and implicitly for the A, B, and C correction terms (see Appendix A). |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | which was shown to match N-body halo measurements well. This introduces two new free parameters {A1, A2} with dimen- sions h−1 Mpc and h−2 Mpc2 respectively, characterising possi- ble scale-dependencies of the linear bias. To keep the degrees of freedom comparable to the Eulerian bias expansion, when adopt- ing this model, we set all higher-order bias terms in Eq. (44) to zero, and simply replace b1 with Eq. (54). |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | where ‘EdS’ means the kernel is an Einstein–de Sitter expres- sion. We note that f = −G1(k, a)/F1(k, a) is calculated exactly for the theory of gravity or dark energy under consideration at the external wave mode, k. Further, the Zb,3 kernel needs to be symmetrised to get Zsym b,3 and variables k and µ are the amplitude of the sum of the momenta k = k1 + k2 + k3 and cosine of angle between ˆk and the line of sight ˆz. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | A further complication comes from the baryonic acoustic oscil- lations whose imprint on the power spectrum should be treated properly to avoid percent-level oscillatory inaccuracies (Car- rasco et al. 2014; Blas et al. 2016). To treat this insufficient damping of the baryon acoustic oscillations, various resumma- tion methods have been proposed. This is particularly relevant for the EFTofLSS and we do not adopt an infrared-resummation scheme in the TNS case. We describe the method implemented by each EFTofLSS code below. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | Here aγ and aγa are the bootstrap time-dependent functions in- troduced in D’Amico et al. (2021a) and are usually fixed to their = 0 because = 10/7 and aEdS EdS values aEdS γa it is degenerate with bG2 , as well as b∇2δ = 0 as it is degenerate with a counterterm. We vary all the other parameters. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | Further, using the TNS model, we wish to test the Local La- grangian relationship (Sheth et al. 2013; Baldauf et al. 2012; Saito et al. 2014) for beyond-ΛCDM cases, which is known to hold well for ΛCDM. Again, we adopt this choice for the TNS model only, as was applied in the BOSS survey (Beutler et al. 2017). This leaves us with only the following bias parameters in the TNS case {b1, b2, N}, which are those used in Beutler et al. (2017) and can be related to the basis used in McDonald & Roy (2009) through Saito et al. (2014). To map these to the basis used in Assassi et al. (2014), which is used in our EFTofLSS models, see Desjacques et al. (2018). |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | Here jn are the spherical Bessel functions of order n and µℓ is the angle between ℓ and the line of sight. ΛIR is a cutoff scale. In PBJ we do not include the exponential cutoff but rather trun- cate the upper bound of the integral to ks. PyBird also uses these functions (see Sect. 3.4.2), but instead of a cutoff, it sets ΛIR = 0.2 h Mpc−1. ℓosc = |ℓosc| is set to be the baryon acoustic oscillations scale. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | For PBJ, we adopt the following choice of parameters: qmin = k e−4λ, qmax = k e4λ, ks = 0.2 h Mpc−1, λ = 0.25 and ℓosc = 102.707 h−1 Mpc with ˆℓosc and ˆk having the same orientation. We note that ℓosc is in principle degenerate with cosmology, and in a full cosmological analysis it should also be varied. This being said, the impact of varying this parameter in such an analysis has been checked internally within the Euclid Collaboration and has been found to be minimal. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | Pybird adopts a different approach to resummation, explic- itly developed in Senatore & Zaldarriaga (2014). The details of the numerical implementation are explained in D’Amico et al. (2021b). |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | where d2 ˆr is an angular integration and µ = µk is now an integra- tion variable. Here T −1 0,r ||N− j(k, y) means that we need to pertur- 11) T −1 batively expand (in powers of Pδδ 0,r up to loop order N − j. If in PyBird the option optiresum is chosen, the correlation function is split in a smooth part and a baryon acoustic oscilla- tions peak, and Eq. (66) is only applied to the baryon acoustic oscillations peak. The result is then added to the smooth power spectrum. For all PyBird results shown in this paper we have used optiresum. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | We find that optiresum and the WnW decomposition are highly consistent, but are both significantly discrepant with the Lagrangian resummation predictions. The reader is directed to Appendix C for more details on these comparisons. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | is the case for ℓosc in Pw(k), the difference in parentheses is either of order Pw osc (for q ℓosc ≪ 1) or Pw 11(k) (for q ℓosc ≫ 1, as the oscillations in the second term inside parentheses average out in this limit). Both regimes give a contribution to Eq. (70) which is k2 enhanced with respect to other perturbative contributions of the same order, and therefore should be resummed. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | fluid. This differs slightly from the prescription of Wright et al. (2019), which was shown to work very well by comparing to simulations. In particular, we do not include the effects of mas- sive neutrinos on the growth rate f . We have checked that this effect is sub-percent for neutrino masses considered here. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | For an approximately scale-invariant power spectrum, the sec- ond derivative gives a contribution of order P(k)/k2 and, conse- quently, Eq. (70) is not k2-enhanced. Therefore, in resummation schemes which focus on the wiggly part of the power spectrum, as in WnW or in the optiresum option of PyBird, only lead- ing contributions are resummed. In other schemes, as the full Lagrangian one, also subleading contributions are included, The difference between the two methods is of order 2-loop terms. The wiggle-no wiggle method has been derived as an approximation of the Lagrangian resummation in ?. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | where the inequality holds in the whole relevant k-range for the f (R) models considered in this work. We conclude that the extra- scale-dependence induced in f (R) is always subdominant with respect to the one induced by baryon acoustic oscillations, and does not require any modification of the infrared-resummation schemes with respect to those for scale-independent models. Pybird implements this scheme, and computes the linear power spectrum in Eqs. (60, 61) by taking the scale-dependent linear growth into account. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | where F(m) (k, a) assumes no massive neutrino contribution but the same total matter contribution to the background evolution and Poisson equation, Ωm. We have checked that using Ωcb in- stead makes negligible difference on the final RSD power spec- trum predictions. On the other hand, P(cb) 11 (k, a) has the full mas- sive neutrino and modified gravity or dark energy dependence, which we calculate using the Boltzmann code MGCAMB (Zucca et al. 2019). The goal is to check for any deterioration of this ap- proximation between the ΛCDM and beyond-ΛCDM compar- isons with the simulation measurements. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | Since the scale-dependence in f (R) is much stronger than that induced by massive neutrinos, the above conclusions extend also to models with nonvanishing neutrino masses. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | With the measurements of flavour oscillations (Fukuda et al. 1998; Ahmed et al. 2004), massive neutrinos entered the realm of standard physics. These have been shown to have a signifi- cant effect on cosmological observables (Lesgourgues & Pastor 2006; Wright et al. 2019; Bose et al. 2021). We look to include these effects in Eq. (41). |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | We refer the interested reader to Baldi & Simpson (2017) for a more extended description of the simulations and of the modified N-body code. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | We note that these simulations have a very limited volume, far smaller than that to be probed by Euclid. As will be seen in Sect. 5.2 and Sect. 5.3, the approximations considered for the Dark Scattering model are extremely good even without intro- ducing bias degrees of freedom, and more so when considering recent lensing and clustering constraints on this model (Carrilho et al. 2023; Carrion et al. 2024). |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | Before discussing our results, we list the various simulations we consider in Table 2. We describe each of these in detail below. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | where As is the amplitude of primordial scalar perturbations, ns is the scalar spectral index and Ωb,0 is the baryon density fraction today. The halo catalogues were constructed with the rockstar halo finder (Behroozi et al. 2013), where we chose the M200c halo mass definition, which is the mass enclosed within a sphere of radius r200c with 200 times the critical density of the universe. |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | These simulations offer one of the largest suites of modified gravity simulations available. There are larger volume simula- tions (see for example Arnold et al. 2019), but single realisa- tion, and so the effective volume the ELEPHANT simulations pro- vide is deemed optimal. The unavailability of simulations with a volume comparable to Euclid largely stems from the fact that running large volume modified gravity simulations is currently extremely computationally challenging (see Arnold et al. 2022, and references therein). |
Processed_Euclid_preparation._Modelling_spectroscopic_cluste.txt | The “Dark Energy and Massive Neutrino Universe” (DEMNUni) simulations (Carbone et al. 2016; Parimbelli et al. 2022) have been produced with the aim of investigating large-scale struc- tures in the presence of massive neutrinos and dynamical dark energy, and they were conceived for the nonlinear analysis and modelling of different probes, including dark matter, halo, and galaxy clustering (see Castorina et al. 2015; Moresco et al. 2017; Zennaro et al. 2018; Ruggeri et al. 2018; Bel et al. 2019; Parim- belli et al. 2021, 2022; Guidi et al. 2023; Baratta et al. 2023; Gouyou Beauchamps et al. 2023, and Carella et al., in prep.), weak lensing, CMB lensing, SZ and ISW effects (Roncarelli et al. 2015; Carbone et al. 2016; Fabbian et al. 2018; Hernández- Molinero et al. 2024), cosmic void statistics (Kreisch et al. 2019; Schuster et al. 2019; Verza et al. 2019, 2022, 2023; Vielzeuf et al. 2023), and cross-correlations among these probes (Cuozzo et al. 2024). The DEMNUni simulations combine a good mass resolu- tion with a large volume to include perturbations both at large and small scales. They are characterised by a softening length ε = 20 h−1 kpc, a comoving volume of 8 h−3 Gpc3 filled with 20483 dark matter particles and, when present, 20483 neutrino particles. The simulations are initialised at zi = 99 with Zel- dovich initial conditions. The initial power spectrum is rescaled to the initial redshift via the rescaling method developed in Zen- naro et al. (2017). Initial conditions are then generated with a modified version of the N-GenIC software, assuming Rayleigh random amplitudes and uniform random phases. The DEMNUni simulations were run using the tree particle mesh-smoothed par- ticle hydrodynamics (TreePM-SPH) code P-Gadget3 (Springel 2005), specifically modified as in Viel et al. (2010) to account for the presence of massive neutrinos. This modified version of P-Gadget3 follows the evolution of CDM and neutrino parti- cles, treating them as two separated collisionless components. |
Processed_Transient_radio_emisison_from_SAX_J1808.4-3658.txt | Millisecond pulsars (MSPs) have long been thought to be the endpoint in the evolution of low-mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs) (Alpar et al. 1982; Radhakrishnan & Srinivasan 1982). Al- though the link between the LMXBs and MSPs is strong, ev- idence that LMXBs did indeed contain objects spinning at millisecond periods was, until recently, still missing. The quasi-periodic oscillations, especially near 1 kHz (van der Klis et al. 1996), recently discovered in X-ray binary systems of- fer indirect evidence for the existence of weakly magnetized neutron stars with millisecond periods. However, the re- cent discovery of 2.49 ms coherent X-ray pulsations from the LMXB SAX J1808.4–3658 (Wijnands & van der Klis 1998b; Chakrabarty & Morgan 1998) now gives strong support to the picture that LMXBs are the progenitors of MSPs; this system provides the best evidence yet that a low-field neutron star can be spun up to millisecond periods via accretion from its com- panion. |
Processed_Transient_radio_emisison_from_SAX_J1808.4-3658.txt | cant fraction of the X-ray binary population (Hjellming & Han 1995; Fender & Hendry 1999). |
Processed_Transient_radio_emisison_from_SAX_J1808.4-3658.txt | We here report on a search for radio emission during the out- burst and then also during quiescence, aimed at testing these In §2 we describe our observations and analy- possibilities. sis, while in §3 we demonstrate the detection of radio emission from the system, and discuss its implications. |
Processed_Transient_radio_emisison_from_SAX_J1808.4-3658.txt | All observations were made with the Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA; Frater, Brooks, & Whiteoak 1992), an east-west synthesis array located near Narrabri, NSW, Aus- tralia; these observations are summarized in Table 1. The ATCA can observe two frequencies simultaneously; for all epochs except 1998 Nov 30, we alternated, approximately ev- ery 20 minutes, between observing with a 1.4/2.5 GHz com- bination and a 4.8/8.6 GHz combination. On 1998 Nov 30, observations were only made at 1.4/2.5 GHz. A bandwidth of 128 MHz was used at each frequency. A pointing center RA (J2000) 18h08m13s, Dec (J2000) - 36◦57′18′′ was observed in all cases, approximately 3′ from the position of SAX J1808.4– 3658 (Giles, Hill, & Greenhill 1999). Amplitudes were cali- brated using observations of PKS B1934–638, assuming a flux density for this source of 15.0, 11.1, 5.8 and 2.8 Jy at 1.4, 2.5, 4.8 and 8.6 GHz respectively (where 1 Jy = 10- 26 W m- 2 Hz- 1). Phases were calibrated using observations once per hour of PKS B1934–638 (at 1.4 & 2.5 GHz) and PMN J1733–3722 (at 4.8 & 8.6 GHz). |
Processed_Transient_radio_emisison_from_SAX_J1808.4-3658.txt | Data were reduced in the MIRIAD package using standard techniques. For each frequency in each observation, images were formed using natural weighting and excluding baselines shorter than 1.5 km. Sidelobes around detected sources were deconvolved using the CLEAN algorithm. Each image was then smoothed to the appropriate diffraction limit, and corrected for the mean primary beam response of the ATCA antennas. |
Processed_Transient_radio_emisison_from_SAX_J1808.4-3658.txt | The position for SAX J1808.4–3658, as determined by is at RA (J2000) observations of its optical counterpart, 18h08m27.′′54, Dec (J2000) - 36◦58′44.′′3 with uncertainties of ∼ 0.′′8 in each coordinate (Giles, Hill, & Greenhill 1999). In all observations except Obs 1, the only radio source detected in a ∼ 5′ region surrounding this position was a double-lobed radio galaxy, NVSS 180824–365813 (Condon et al. 1998); no source was seen at the position of SAX J1808.4–3658. The resolution and limiting sensitivity for these non-detections are summarized in Table 1. |
Processed_Transient_radio_emisison_from_SAX_J1808.4-3658.txt | about 10% of the Eddington limit (Wijnands & van der Klis 1998a). Fender & Hendry (1999) review the radio properties of different types of persistent X-ray binaries, and show that most atoll sources show no radio emission — the only detec- tions have been transient, and at the mJy level. When transient radio emission is seen from the atoll sources, the spectrum is first seen absorbed, but then becomes optically thin and takes on a synchrotron spectrum with α ≈ - 0.5 (Sν ∝ να). The emis- sion then decays away through adiabatic losses (e.g. Hjellming & Han 1995). |
Processed_Transient_radio_emisison_from_SAX_J1808.4-3658.txt | In Obs 1 an unresolved radio source near the position of SAX J1808.4–3658 was detected at the ∼ 4σ level at each of 2.5, 4.8 and 8.6 GHz, as shown in Figure 1; flux densities are given in Table 2. The source was not detected at 1.4 GHz. We attemped various approaches to the imaging, deconvolution and fitting processes. The results of these suggest a systematic un- certainty in the flux densities for the source of ∼50%, a value to be expected when deconvolving a weak source under condi- tions of poor u - v coverage. Our best position for this source is RA (J2000) 18h08m27.′′6, Dec (J2000) - 36◦58′43.′′9 with an uncertainty of ∼ 0.′′5 in each coordinate. In the bottom panel of Figure 1, our position and the optically determined positions of Giles et al. (1999) and Roche et al. (1998) are compared. All three positions are consistent within the quoted uncertainties. |
Processed_Transient_radio_emisison_from_SAX_J1808.4-3658.txt | The source shown in Figure 1 is almost certainly not an ar- tifact. It is not at the phase center, and was detected at three different frequencies and for a variety of different weighting schemes and combinations of baselines. While the probabil- ity of finding an unrelated radio source within a few arcsec of SAX J1808.4–3658 is low in any case, we note that this source was not detected at any other epoch, despite the improved sen- sitivity of these later observations. Furthermore, the region was observed with the Very Large Array (VLA) on 1998 Apr 26, the day immediately before Obs 1, and no source was detected at this position down to a comparable sensitivity (R.M. Hjellm- ing, private communication). Therefore, from its transient na- ture and positional coincidence with the optical counterpart of SAX J1808.4–3658, we conclude that this radio source is asso- ciated with the system. |
Processed_Transient_radio_emisison_from_SAX_J1808.4-3658.txt | Our data lack the time-resolution required to search for pulsed radio emission from this source. However, X-ray emis- sion due to accretion was present at the time of our detection, and it is likely that if any radio emission was being produced in the pulsar magnetosphere it would be quenched by this process. Thus the source we have detected is most likely not emission associated with the magnetosphere. It is also unlikely that the source corresponds to emission from a pulsar wind (if such a wind even exists at this point in the system’s evolution) — if we assume that the disappearance of the source between Obs 1 and Obs 2 is due to synchrotron losses, then this cooling time-scale implies a magnetic field in the wind of ∼>2 G, many orders of magnitudes higher than observed for other pulsars (e.g. Manch- ester, Staveley-Smith, & Kesteven 1993; Frail et al. 1996). The detection of radio emission only at an epoch during which X- rays were still being generated provides strong evidence that this radio source is related to the accretion process. |
Processed_Transient_radio_emisison_from_SAX_J1808.4-3658.txt | The properties of the radio emission seen here for SAX J1808.4–3658 are consistent with this behavior. While the spec- trum of the source is very poorly constrained by our data, the flux densities for it at 2.5 GHz and above are consistent with α ≈ - 0.5, while the non-detection at 1.4 GHz is suggestive of a low-frequency turnover probably due to self-absorption in the ejecta. |
Processed_Transient_radio_emisison_from_SAX_J1808.4-3658.txt | We note that on 1998 Apr 26, the day before our radio detec- tion, the X-ray flux suddenly deviated from exponential decay and began to rapidly decrease (Gilfanov et al. 1998). As dis- cussed by these authors, there are two different mechanisms which can produce such a cut-off, either the onset of the so- called “propeller phase” or an instability of the accretion disk. In both cases the abrupt change corresponds to ejection of ma- terial from the system. The appearance of transient radio emis- sion just after this event suggests that it is this ejection of mate- rial which has produced the source we see here. If we assume that emission above 2.5 GHz corresponds to optically thin, in- coherent, unbeamed, synchrotron emission, the 1012 K Comp- ton limit on the brightness temperature corresponds to a mini- mum scale for the emission of ∼12 light seconds at a distance of 4 kpc, much larger than the ∼1 light second binary separation of the orbit (Chakrabarty & Morgan 1998). Thus the emission is coming from well beyond the binary, as would be expected if it has resulted from an expulsion of material from the system. |
Processed_Transient_radio_emisison_from_SAX_J1808.4-3658.txt | At later times, no radio emission was detected at the posi- tion of SAX J1808.4–3658. This is not necessarily indicative that the radio pulse mechanism is not yet functioning. De- spite strong limits on the flux density from our non-detections, the apparently large distance to the system of ∼4 kpc corre- sponds to a 3σ monochromatic luminosity limit of L1.4 GHz ∼ 6 mJy kpc2, greater than that of the majority of known MSPs (Taylor et al. 1995). Furthermore, Ergma et al. (1999) have proposed that this system may only be detected at shorter wave- lengths (λ < 3 cm) due to free-free absorption by material ex- creted from the system. |
Processed_Transient_radio_emisison_from_SAX_J1808.4-3658.txt | We have detected a transient radio source coincident with SAX J1808.4–3658; the source turned on within a day, and then had disappeared again a month later. We interpret this source as radio emission associated with ejection of material, as seen in other X-ray binaries, and in this case possibly associated with the onset of a propellor phase or a disk instability the day before the source was detected. The spectrum and light curve of this source are essentially unconstrained, however, and the source should certainly be searched for radio emission next time it is in outburst. Eventually, it is hoped that this source will emerge as a radio MSP; radio searches in quiescence should continue to be carried out in anticipation of this. |
Processed_Transient_radio_emisison_from_SAX_J1808.4-3658.txt | through Hubble Fellowship grant HF-01107.01-98A awarded by the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., for NASA under contract NAS 5–26555. BWS is supported by NWO Spinoza grant 08-0 to E.P.J. van den Heuvel. |
Processed_Transient_radio_emisison_from_SAX_J1808.4-3658.txt | G. B., & Broderick, J. J. 1998, AJ, 115, 1693. Ergma, E. & Antipova, J. 1999, A&A, 343, 45. Fender, R. P., Bell Burnell, S. J., & Waltman, E. B. 1997, Vistas Astron., 41, 3. Fender, R. P. & Hendry, M. A. 1999, MNRAS, . submitted. Frail, D. A., Giacani, E. B., Goss, W. M., & Dubner, G. 1996, ApJ, 464, L165. H., Frater, R. Brooks, J. W., & Whiteoak, J. B. 1992, J. Electr. Electron. Eng. Aust., 12, 103. |
Processed_Transient_radio_emisison_from_SAX_J1808.4-3658.txt | Fruchter, A. S. et al. 1990, ApJ, 351, 642. Giles, A. B., Hill, K. M., & Greenhill, J. G. 1999, MNRAS, 304, 47. |
Processed_Transient_radio_emisison_from_SAX_J1808.4-3658.txt | Wijnands, R. & van der Klis, M. 1998a, ApJ, 507, L63. Wijnands, R. & van der Klis, M. 1998b, Nature, 394, 344. |
Processed_Transient_radio_emisison_from_SAX_J1808.4-3658.txt | FIG. 1.— 2.5, 4.8 and 8.6 GHz images of SAX J1808.4–3658 on 1998 Apr 27. Contours in each image are at the levels of 0.3, 0.45, 0.6 and 0.75 mJy beam- 1, while the synthesized beam (FWHM) is shown at lower right of each panel. In the 8.6 GHz image, a cross and a star mark the optical positions for SAX J1808.4–3658 of Giles et al. (1999) and Roche et al. (1998) respectively, while the large arc corresponds to the edge of the X-ray timing error circle of Chakrabarty & Morgan (1998). |
Processed_Radio_Continuum_Study_of_the_Large_Magellanic_Clou.txt | SUMMARY: We present the first and deepest Australia Telescope Compact Array radio continuum images of the Honeycomb Nebula at 2000 and 5500 MHz solely from archival data. The resolutions of these images are 3.6 × 2.8 arcsec2 and 1.3 × 1.2 arcsec2 at 2000 and 5500 MHz. We find an average radio spectral index for the remnant of −0.76 ± 0.07. Polarisation maps at 5500 MHz reveal an average fractional polarisation of 25 ± 5% with a maximum value of 95 ± 16. We estimate the equipartition field for Honeycomb Nebula of 48 ± 5 µG, with an estimated minimum energy of Emin = 3 × 1049 erg. The estimated surface brightness, Σ1 GHz, is 30 × 10−20 W m−2 Hz−1 sr−1; applying the Σ-D relation suggests this supernova remnant is expanding into a low-density environment. Finally, using Hi data, we can support the idea that the Honeycomb Nebula exploded inside a low-density wind cavity. We suggest that this remnant is likely to be between late free expansion stage and early Sedov phase of evolution and expanding into a low-density medium. |
Processed_Radio_Continuum_Study_of_the_Large_Magellanic_Clou.txt | the same distance, making physical measurements, including the extent of physical size, more reliable. Additionally, the LMC is approximately face-on in orientation (having an inclination angle of ∼35◦, van der Marel and Cioni 2001) and is near enough to allow deep, high-resolution (spatial and spectral) multi-frequency SNR observations (Maggi et al. 2016, Bozzetto et al. 2017, Yew et al. 2021, Bozzetto et al. 2023). |
Processed_Radio_Continuum_Study_of_the_Large_Magellanic_Clou.txt | The Honeycomb Nebula (MC SNRJ0535–6918) is one of the most peculiar SNRs in the LMC – just a few arcminutes south-east of the well-known SN 1987A. It was discovered by Wang (1992) using the ROSAT survey. Meaburn et al. (1993) presented a kinematic study of the Honeycomb Nebula and con- cluded that all the kinematic features can be gener- ated as one or more young SNRs colliding in a dense environment. Chu et al. (1995) used a combination of archival and new ROSAT X-ray data and Aus- tralia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA) with Mo- longlo Observatory Synthesis Telescope (MOST) ra- dio data to find both bright X-ray and nonthermal radio emission. Moreover, they reported an enhanced [S ii]/Hα ratio and a steep radio spectral index of – 1.2. Redman et al. (1999) used optical observations obtained from the Manchester Echelle spectrometer to produce new kinematical and density data for the Honeycomb Nebula. Meaburn et al. (2010) also used optical data in a spectral analysis of forbidden line ratios to infer the nebula is most likely a SNR. |
Processed_Radio_Continuum_Study_of_the_Large_Magellanic_Clou.txt | array configurations are presented in Table 1. All observations were carried out in ‘snap-shot’ mode, with 1-hour of integration over a 12-hours period as a minimum. All used the Compact Array Broadband Backend with 2048 MHz bandwidth, centred at wave- lengths of 6 cm (ν = 4500–6500 MHz; the midpoint at 5500 MHz) and 13 cm (ν = 1972 and 2150 MHz). |
Processed_Radio_Continuum_Study_of_the_Large_Magellanic_Clou.txt | We used miriad2 (Sault et al. 1995), karma3 (Gooch 1995), and DS94 (Joye and Mandel 2003) software packages for reduction and analysis. All ob- servations were calibrated using the phase and flux calibrators listed in Table 1 with three rounds of phase-only self-calibration using the selfcal task. Imaging was completed using the multi-frequency synthesis invert task with uniform Briggs weighting (robust = 0) and a beam size of 1.3 × 1.2 arcsec2 for 5500 MHz (see Fig. 1-top). We combined 2150 and 1972 MHz data to produce one image at 2000 MHz with a beam size of 3.6 × 2.8 arcsec2 (see Fig. 1- bottom). The mfclean and restor algorithms were used to deconvolve the images, with primary beam correction applied using the linmos task. We fol- low the same process with stokes Q and U parame- ters to produce polarisation maps with a beam size of 3 × 3 arcsec2 (see Fig. 2 and Section 3.3 for more details). |
Processed_Radio_Continuum_Study_of_the_Large_Magellanic_Clou.txt | Meaburn et al. (2010) found the Honeycomb Neb- ula is more extended in soft X-ray emission and could be a small section on the edge of a giant LMC shell. They suggest a secondary supernova explosion on this edge may be responsible for the creation of the neb- ula. |
Processed_Radio_Continuum_Study_of_the_Large_Magellanic_Clou.txt | In this paper we present a radio continuum study of the Honeycomb Nebula using ATCA archival data to produce high-fidelity images and we compare them with other multiwavelength data (X-ray and optical). In Section 2 we present the data used and their reduc- tion details. Section 3 explores further analysis and discussion including radio morphology, polarisation, spectral index, surface brightness and luminosity. Fi- nally, in Section 4, we conclude with a summary of our findings. |
Processed_Radio_Continuum_Study_of_the_Large_Magellanic_Clou.txt | In order to better understand the interstellar environ- ment surrounding the Honeycomb Nebula, we used archived Hi data from the ATCA & Parkes 64-m ra- dio telescope (Kim et al. 2003). The combined Hi data has an angular resolution of ∼60′′, correspond- ing to a spatial resolution of ∼15 pc. Typical noise fluctuations are ∼0.3 K at a velocity resolution of ∼1.6 km s−1 (Fig. 3). |
Processed_Radio_Continuum_Study_of_the_Large_Magellanic_Clou.txt | Detailed comparisons of X-ray morphology with our new radio images were made using sub-arcsecond resolution data from the Chandra X-ray Observa- tory (Weisskopf et al. 1996). Due to its proxim- ity to SN 1987A, the Honeycomb Nebula has been observed many times by Chandra. We retrieved all available data that included the Honeycomb Nebula using the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer S- array (ACIS-S, Garmire et al. 2003) with exposure times of ≳40 ks. A list of observations are given in Table 3. |
Processed_Applications_of_Linear_Defeasible_Logic:_combining.txt | Linear Logic and Defeasible Logic have been adopted to formalise different features of knowledge representation: consumption of resources, and non monotonic reasoning in particular to represent exceptions. Recently, a framework to combine sub-structural features, corresponding to the consumption of resources, with defeasibility aspects to handle potentially conflicting information, has been discussed in literature, by some of the authors. Two applications emerged that are very relevant: energy management and business process management. We illustrate a set of guide lines to determine how to apply linear defeasible logic to those contexts. |
Processed_Applications_of_Linear_Defeasible_Logic:_combining.txt | Resource-based logical framework have been employed to accommodate varieties of methods that propose to introduce relevant limits to the reasoning process. In particular, in the idealised representation of rational agents, these agents have unlimited reasoning power, complete knowledge of the environment and their capabilities, and unlimited resources. Over the years, a few approaches (using different logics) have been advanced to overcome some of these ideal (and definitely unrealistic) assumptions. |
Processed_Applications_of_Linear_Defeasible_Logic:_combining.txt | In [15, 20, 21], the authors propose the use of Linear Logic to model the notion of resource utilisation, and to generate which plans the agent adopts to achieve its goals. In the same spirit, [13, 12] address the problem of agents being able to take decisions from partial, incomplete, and possibly inconsistent knowledge bases, using (extensions of) Defeasible Logic (a computational and proof theoretic approach) to non-monotonic reasoning and reasoning with exceptions. While these last two approaches seem very far apart, they are both based on proof theory (where the key notion is on the idea of (logical) derivation), and both logics (for different reasons and different techniques) have been used for modelling business processes [14, 26, 8, 23, 19, 17, 9]. |
Processed_Applications_of_Linear_Defeasible_Logic:_combining.txt | Formally, a business process can be understood as a compact representation of a set of traces, where a trace is a sequence of tasks. A business process is hence equivalent to a set of plans with possible choices, or a partially specified plan. The idea behind the work mentioned above is to allow agents to use their deliberation phase to determine the business processes (instead of the plans) to execute. |
Processed_Applications_of_Linear_Defeasible_Logic:_combining.txt | In this paper, we discuss some applications of the combination of linear logic and a computationally oriented non-monotonic formalism known as defeasible logic. The linear defeasible logic has been introduced recently [18]. |
Processed_Applications_of_Linear_Defeasible_Logic:_combining.txt | A formalism that properly models processes should feature some key characteristics, and one of the most important ones is to identify which resources are consumed after a task has finished its execution. Consider the notorious vending machine scenario by Girard, where the dollar resource is spent to produce a can of cola. once we get the cola, the dollar resource is no longer spendable. However, the specifications of a process may include thousands of rules to represent at their best all the various situations that may occur during the execution of the process itself: situations where the information at hand may be incomplete and, sometimes, even contradictory, and rules encoding possible exceptions. This means that we have to adopt a formalism that is able to represent and reason with exceptions, and partial information. |
Processed_Applications_of_Linear_Defeasible_Logic:_combining.txt | r1 : 1$ ⇒ cola r2 : OutOfOrder ⇒ ¬cola r3 : Off ⇒ ¬cola. |
Processed_Applications_of_Linear_Defeasible_Logic:_combining.txt | logic, and then discuss two specific cases in which that fornalism applies to energy management and business processes. In particular we dedicate Section 2 to the discussion of the properties introduced in the system discussed in [18], further detailed in Section 3. Section 4 is indeed devoted to the discussion of the applications of Linear Defeasible Logic. Section 5 discusses some further works and takes conclusions. |
Processed_Applications_of_Linear_Defeasible_Logic:_combining.txt | We dedicate this section to detailing which features are needed for linear defeasible logic. This section refers to the identified properties in [18]. The properties are summarised in a short way. |
Processed_Applications_of_Linear_Defeasible_Logic:_combining.txt | Ordered list of antecedents. Given the rule ‘r : a, b ⇒ c’, the order in which we derive a and b is typically irrelevant for the derivation of c. As such, r may indistinctively assume the form ‘b, a ⇒ c’. Consider a login procedure requiring a username and password. Whether we insert one credential before the other does not affect a successful login. |
Processed_Applications_of_Linear_Defeasible_Logic:_combining.txt | Naturally, in the same set/list of antecedents, combinations of sequences and multi-sets of literals is possible. For instance, “r : a; b; (c, d); e ⇒ f ” represents a situation where, in order to obtain f , we need to first obtain a, then b, then either c or d in any order, and lastly, only after both c and d are obtained, we need to obtain e. |
Processed_Applications_of_Linear_Defeasible_Logic:_combining.txt | The notation ‘;’ is used as a separator in sequences, while ‘,’ separates in multi-sets. |
Processed_Applications_of_Linear_Defeasible_Logic:_combining.txt | Multi-occurrence/repetitions of literals. From these ideas, it follows that some literals may appear in multiple instances, and that two rules such as “r : a; a; b ⇒ c” and “s : a; b; a ⇒ c” are semantically different. Rule r may describe a scenario where the order of a product may require two deposit payments followed by a full payment prior to delivery. |
Processed_Applications_of_Linear_Defeasible_Logic:_combining.txt | Resources consumption. Assume we have two rules, “r : a, b ⇒ d” and “s : a, c ⇒ e”. If we are able to derive a, b and c, then d and e are subsequently obtained. Deducing both d and e is a typical problem of resource consumption. |
Processed_Applications_of_Linear_Defeasible_Logic:_combining.txt | In our framework, deriving a literal means to produce the corresponding resource. After it has been produced, it can be ‘consumed’ if it appears in the antecedent of a rule. Naturally, since we have complete knowledge of our theory, we know exactly in which rules such a literal appears as an antecedent. Not consuming a resource when such is available means that either no rule is applied, or that the rule where the literal appears in as antecedent was blocked by a rule for the opposite. |
Processed_Applications_of_Linear_Defeasible_Logic:_combining.txt | Concurrent production. Symmetrically, we consider two rules with the same conclusion: “r : a ⇒ c ” and “s : b ⇒ c”. It now seems reasonable that, if both a and b are derived, then we conclude two instances of c (whereas in classical logics we only know that c holds true). For example, consider a family where it is tradition to have pizza on Friday evening. Last Friday, the parents were unable to communicate with each other during the day, and one baked the pizza while the other bought take-away on the way home. However, there exists consistent cases where multiple rules for the same literal produce only one instance of the literal (even if they all fire). For example, both a digital or handwritten signature would provide permission to proceed with a request. The same request does not require permission twice: either it is permitted, or it is not. |
Processed_Applications_of_Linear_Defeasible_Logic:_combining.txt | Resource consumption: A team defeater perspective. Sceptical logics provide a means to decide which conclusion to draw in case of contradicting information. A superiority relation is given among rules for contrary conclusions: it is possible to derive a conclusion only if there exists a single rule stronger than all the rules for the opposite literal. |
Processed_Applications_of_Linear_Defeasible_Logic:_combining.txt | DL handles conflicts differently, and the idea here is that of team defeater. We do not look at whether there is a single rule prevailing over all the other rules, but rather whether there exists a team of rules which can jointly defeat the rules for the contrary conclusion. That is, suppose rules r (cid:48), r (cid:48)(cid:48) and r (cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:48) all conclude P, whilst s(cid:48) and s(cid:48)(cid:48) are for ¬P. If r (cid:48) > s(cid:48) and r (cid:48)(cid:48) > s(cid:48)(cid:48), then the team defeater made of {r (cid:48), r (cid:48)(cid:48)} is sufficient to prove P. |
Processed_Applications_of_Linear_Defeasible_Logic:_combining.txt | are, again, which resources are consumed, and how many instances of the conclusion are derived. |
Processed_Applications_of_Linear_Defeasible_Logic:_combining.txt | Consider the process of writing a scientific publication. If the paper is accepted, the manuscript resource is consumed: it cannot be submitted again. On the contrary, if the paper is rejected, the manuscript resource is not consumed since it can be submitted again. |
Processed_Applications_of_Linear_Defeasible_Logic:_combining.txt | Multiple conclusions and resource preservation. Consider internet shopping. As soon as we pay for our online order, the bank account balance decreases, the seller’s account increases. Both the seller and the web site have the shipping address. |
Processed_Applications_of_Linear_Defeasible_Logic:_combining.txt | The conclusion of a rule is usually a single literal but the above example suggests that a single rule may produce more than one conclusion. We thus allow rules to have multiple conclusions, like “r : a, b ⇒ c, d”. Similar to our discussion on the ordering of antecedents, we may have any combination of or- dered/unordered sequences of conclusions. In the previous example, only after we have provided the credit card credentials, our bank account decreases, whilst we can provide the shipping address before the credit card credentials, or the other way around. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.