Filename
stringlengths 22
64
| Paragraph
stringlengths 8
5.57k
|
|---|---|
Processed_Space-Time_Variation_of_Physical_Constants_and_Rel.txt | We can also consider s − p transitions to the different multiplets. However, the relativis- tic effects in the differences between the central energy points E0 of different multiplets ( D, F and P ) are substantially smaller ( ∼ 100 - 200 cm−1) than the relativistic shift of the s − p transition frequency, since these differences are due to the dependence of the Coulomb interaction Q between external electrons on the relativistic correction to their wave func- tions (∆ω ∼ QZ 2α2 where Q is the non-diagonal matrix element of the Coulomb interaction producing configuration mixing). There are also small relativistic corrections to the inter- val between the different multiplets due to the second order in the spin-orbit interaction. However, the relativistic effect in the difference of the frequencies of particular components of different multiplets can be larger. The maximal relativistic shift in the differences of the FeII frequencies (for the transitions which have been observed in the quasar spectra) is 387 cm−1 in the difference between 6F9/2 and 6P7/2 (see below). |
Processed_Space-Time_Variation_of_Physical_Constants_and_Rel.txt | In principle, approximate calculations of the average relativistic frequency shift of the 4s − 4p transition and the dependence of the fine structure intervals on α could be done using semiempirical formulae (2) - (5) which give average the shift 1550 cm−1, and laboratory experimental data. However, to calculate accurately the relativistic shift for each transition we performed relativistic many-body calculations for energy levels of FeII. |
Processed_Space-Time_Variation_of_Physical_Constants_and_Rel.txt | Hartree-Fock states with n ≤ 6 (17 single-electron orbitals). Only those configurations were included that can be obtained by a single or double-electron excitation from the main configuration. Thus, the total number of configurations was few hundred. This is a rather small-scale configuration interaction and full convergence was not achieved. However, good agreement with experimental data for the energy levels shows that a greater part of the valence correlations were included. |
Processed_Space-Time_Variation_of_Physical_Constants_and_Rel.txt | lying 19797.96 cm−1 above ground state.( This pair of levels was used to study parity non- conservation in Refs. [7,8]). There are other examples of “accidentally” degenerate levels in the rare-earth and actinide atoms and many close levels in other heavy atoms and ions (in the absence of degeneracy one should look for s − d or s − p transitions where the rel- ativistic effects are larger). In the case of “accidental” degeneracy the contributions of the relativistic corrections to the frequency of the E1 transition in a heavy atom (∼ 1000cm−1) is compensated by the difference in the Coulomb interaction energies of the two configura- tions. However, if α varies with time, this compensation will eventually disappear. Thus, we have a correction ∼ 1000 cm−1(( α )2 − 1) to the very small ( ¡ 0.01 cm−1) frequency αl of the transition. One can measure, for example, the time dependence of the ratio of fre- quencies for transitions between the hyperfine components of these two states. In the case of “accidentally” degenerate levels belonging to different electron terms in a molecule one can have enhanced effects of the change of both α and the nucleon mass. In the latter case the enhancement factor is the ratio of the vibration energy to the small frequency of the transition. |
Processed_Space-Time_Variation_of_Physical_Constants_and_Rel.txt | E-mail: [email protected] http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/˜dzuba/ [1] P. A. M. Dirac, Nature, 139, 323 (1937). [2] W. Marciano, Phys. Rev. Lett., 52, 489 (1984). [3] J. D. Barrow, Phys. Rev. D, 35, 1805 (1987). [4] T. Damour, and A. M. Polyakov, Nucl. Phys. B, 423, 596 (1994). [5] D. A. Varshalovich and A. Y. Potekhin, Space Science Review, 74, 259 (1995). [6] Other possibilities include comparison of the hyperfine transition frequency with the molecular rotational interval, which at present gives the best limit on the change of α2gp where gp is the proton magnetic g-factor -see M. J. Drinkwater, J. K. Webb, J. D. Barrow and V. V. Flambaum, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., to be published. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia (PASA) © Astronomical Society of Australia 2018; published by Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/pas.2018.xxx. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | During our optical monitoring of UV Ceti, iconic late-type flaring star, with high temporal resolution using the Russian 6-m telescope in 2008 we detected a giant flare with the amplitude of about 3 magnitudes in U -band. Near flare maximum more than a dozen of spike bursts have been discovered with triangular shapes and durations from 0.6 to 1.2 s and maximal luminosities in the range (1.5 − 8) × 1027 erg s−1. For the half of these events the linear polarization exceeds 35% with significance better than 5σ. We argue that these events are synchrotron emission of electron streams with the energies of several hundred MeV moving in the magnetic field of about 1.4 kG. Emission from such ultrarelativistic (with energies far exceeding 10 MeV) particles is being routinely observed in solar flares, but has never been detected from UV Ceti type stars. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | This is the first ever detection of linearly polarized optical light from the UV Ceti-type stars which indicates that at least some fraction of the flaring events on these stars are powered by a non-thermal synchrotron emission mechanism. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | Presently there are no doubts that the flaring activity of the Sun and flaring stars, particularly those of UV Cet- type, is of a common origin (Gershberg 2015). Flaring events are caused by the release of energy stored in coro- nal magnetic fields. Therewith up to 10–50% of the mag- netic energy is converted to the kinetic energy of accel- erated electrons and ions in solar flares (Lin & Hudson 1976; Miller et al. 1997; Holman et al. 2003). They are partly ejected away from the star and partly move along coronal magnetic loops, heating dense regions of the stellar atmosphere and generating the flare-like emission in a wide range of frequencies, from radio to gamma- rays (Priest & Forbes 2000; Benz & G¨udel 2010). |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | G¨udel et al. 1996; G¨udel 2002) correlated with varia- tions of soft X-ray emission of the chromospheric and photospheric plasma heated by these particles (G¨udel 2002; Smith et al. 2005; Benz & G¨udel 2010), but the presence of ultrarelativistic electrons with γ > 10 has never been revealed in these studies. On the other hand, the detection of such particles has been reported as a result of radio observations of T Tau stars in binary systems (Massi et al. 2006; Salter et al. 2010). |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | other hand, optical spike bursts with sub-second du- rations in quiet states of flaring stars have been de- tected only in a few cases – a bit more than dozen of flashes seen in different years and with different in- struments while observing EV Lac, BY Dra, V577 Mon and CN Leo (Zhilyaev & Verlyuk 1995; Robinson et al. 1995; Tovmassian et al. 1997; Zhilyaev et al. 1998) and lacking proper interpretations. A number of small am- plitude flares with durations of a few seconds have re- cently been reported in UV Ceti (Schmitt et al. 2016). As the timescale of synchrotron spikes is close to the one of emission mechanism for optical flashes, which may be down to 0.1 − 1 s (Katsova & Livshits 1986; Shvartsman et al. 1988; criterion Katsova & Livshits 2001), an additional is necessary to distinguish between these mecha- nisms – the presence of linear polarization, which is a characteristic feature of synchrotron emission 1965; Rybicki & Lightman (Ginzburg & Syrovatskii 1979). Therefore, in order to confidently detect such synchrotron emission from a flaring star, one has to perform its regular photo-polarimetric monitoring with high temporal resolution using large telescope. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | Numerous attempts to detect the polarization in flares of YZ CMi, AD Leo, EV Lac, YY Gem, observed with various telescopes (Karpen et al. 1977; Eritsian 1978; Tuominen et al. 1989) were also unsuccessful. Most reliable data have been acquired during EV Lac study using 1.25 m telescope of the Crimean Astrophys- ical Observatory (Alekseev et al. 1994). The upper lim- its for polarization degree in strong flares have been placed on 2% level on 10 s timescale, and 1% level – on a 50 s one. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | In 1982-1985 we performed a regular photometric monitoring of UV Ceti, CN Leo, V 577 Mon and Wolf 424 flaring stars using the Russian 6-m telescope with 1 microsecond temporal resolution. More than hundred flashes have been detected in U band, and the upper limits on the amplitude of intensity variations, both during the flares and outside them, on time scales from 1 µs to 1 s have been placed on the level of 20% to 0.5% (Beskin et al. 1988a,b), correspondingly. The shortest details detected were the rising fronts of four flares of these stars with durations from 0.3 to 0.8 seconds; de- cay times of these flares were 1 to 3 seconds (Shvarts- man et al., 1988). These data, along with the statistical properties of all temporal characteristics, have led to conclusion that the flares, even the shortest ones, may be explained by the gas-dynamic model (Beskin et al. 1988b; Katsova & Livshits 2001; Gershberg 2015). |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | of dMe-dwarf UV Ceti during this monitoring. Near its maximum, we discovered more than a dozen of spike bursts with the duration of 0.6 – 1.2 s, with linear polarization exceeding 35% – 40% for the majority of them. We argue that these events were generated by synchrotron emission of electrons with the energies of several hundred MeV moving in magnetic fields with the strength of about 1.4 kG, and therefore are the first ever evidence for the presence of ultrarelativistic elec- trons in the flares of UV Cet-type stars. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the equipment and methods used for the high tempo- ral resolution photopolarimetric observations of flaring stars with the Russian 6-m telescope. In Section 3, the observational characteristics of detected spike bursts are described, and in Section 4 the physical conditions nec- essary for their generation are analyzed. Section 4 also contains the discussion of ultrarelativistic electrons pro- duction mechanisms in UV Ceti like stars. Section 5 presents the brief summary of our results. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | Figure 1. Light curve of UV Ceti flare in U band with 0.1 s tem- poral resolution, obtained with Russian 6-m telescope on Dec 28, 2008. The inlet shows the region marked with dashed lines in the main plot. In turn, the region marked with vertical dashed lines in the inlet, containing all the spike bursts, is shown in Figure 3. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | We know only the first two, and may therefore place the lower limit on the degree of linear polarization, as P ≥ |Q|/I for all U values. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | The giant flare of UV Ceti, with nearly 3m amplitude and fast (∼ 10 seconds, as compared to 30 minutes over- all duration) initial rise, has been detected on Dec 28, 2008 at 15:27:02 UT. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | The light curve, computed as a sum of background subtracted intensities in two images, is shown in Fig- ure 1. As we did not have any other star in the field of view, to calibrate the flux we associated the aver- age pre-flare flux (-100 s to 0 s) level with mU = 14.86 magnitude of UV / BL Ceti pair (Eason et al. 1992), and assumed the distance d = 2.68 pc. The inlet of Fig- ure 1 also shows the two-minute interval of maximal intensity with 0.1 s temporal resolution. During this in- terval, more than a dozen of spike bursts with 6–50% relative amplitudes and durations not exceeding (except for two cases) 1.2 s are clearly seen. Their analysis will be performed in the next section. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | Figure 2. The behaviour of normalized Stokes Q/I parameter during the pre-flare and flare main part intervals. Levels of σ and 3σ, estimated assuming Poissonian statistics, are shown. Vertical lines mark the interval where spike bursts are detected. Some of them show significant polarization, while all other intervals of the light curve (upper panel) do not. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | atmospheric and interstellar polarization, we computed the mean value of k = I0/I90 over the 100 seconds long pre-flare interval, hki = 1.23, and scaled the I90 using this coefficient. This way normalized Stokes Q/I pa- rameter has zero mean over that interval. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | Figure 2 shows the Stokes Q/I over the pre-flare and main part of the flare interval (the gap from 240 s to 250 s corresponds to the restart of data acquisition sys- tem where the information has been lost). No significant deviations from zero may be seen, except for the short events coinciding with the spike bursts detected in the light curve. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | Figure 3 shows the region of the light curve with clearly seen flaring activity, where 14 spike bursts have been detected. Their rise times are 0.2 – 0.5 seconds, and the shapes are nearly symmetric (see upper panel in Figure 3). |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | Figure 3. The fragment of UV Ceti flare light curve contain- ing 14 spike bursts, whose shapes are approximated with splitted Gaussian profiles (upper panel), approximated with the smooth spline for the background flare and splitted Gaussians for the spikes. Lower panel shows the normalized residuals, normally dis- tributed everywhere except for the 10-s region around complex peak №12. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | mation is shown in Figure 3, and the fit parameters are listed in Table 1. The residuals, shown in lower panel of Figure 3, are distributed normally – Shapiro-Wilk normality test can not reject their normality with p- value better than 0.3 (except for 10 second long interval around spike №12, which has very complex shape, and most probably consists of several blended sub-spikes, which can’t be easily separated), and therefore the ap- proximation is quite optimal. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | To test the randomness of spikes’ peak times we per- formed Kolmogorov-Smirnov test on t0 values from Ta- ble 1, which gave p-value of 0.7, which confirms that the distribution of spikes in time is uniform. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | Figure 4 displays the spikes’ rise and fading times with corresponding fit errors. If we exclude com- plex spikes №12 and №13, then the rise and fad- ing times are uncorrelated (with Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.08) and follow the same distribu- tion (with Kolmogorov-Smirnov test p-value p = 0.26). Their mean values are hS1i = (0.24 ± 0.04) s, hS2i = (0.38 ± 0.06) s. Therefore, the spikes are nearly sym- metric and have triangular form. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | Figure 4. Comparison of the spikes’ rise and fall times. Total durations of 12 events are less than a second; for 6 events rise and fall times are nearly equal, while for 6 others – the latters are 2–2.5 times greater. Durations of two spikes (№12 and №13) are 2 – 3 seconds – most probably, they consist of several overlapping events. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | light curve. Figure 5 shows the close-up of the interval containing these spikes with polarization fitted with the same splitted Gaussian profiles with all the parameters fixed to values listed in Table 1 except for the ampli- tudes. It is clear that the positional and morphological coincidence of spikes in intensity and normalized Stokes Q/I parameter is perfect, while the amplitudes of the latters are in most cases exceeding 2.5σ (spikes №№1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, and 14). For a more evident picture of their significances, the lower panel of Figure 5 shows the same quantity as the middle one, but constructed from the light curves rebinned to 0.5 s temporal reso- lution, so that the spikes fall into 1 to 3 bins, and the RMS decreases by 2.23 times. Then the significance of polarized spikes is better than 10−4, and the probabil- ity of overall effect to be random is definitely lower than 10−20. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | Figure 5. The region of UV Ceti flare near its maximum (see Figure 3) with 0.1 s resolution (upper panel) and the normalized Stokes Q/I parameter with the same resolution (middle panel). Red lines are approximations of spikes with all parameters except amplitudes fixed to values listed in Table 1. The lower panel is the same quantity rebinned to 0.5 s resolution and normalized to its Poissonian errors. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | Figure 6. Independent fits of I0 and I90 polarized emission com- ponents of the region shown in Figure 5 with splitted Gaussians with all parameters except amplitudes fixed to values listed in Table 1. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | Table 1 and Figure 7 show these values along with corresponding errors. For six spikes (№№3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13) the polarization lower limits do not differ significantly from zero, exceeding it for less than one σ (in three cases) and for 1.5 – 2 σ (three more cases). The polar- ization of eight other spikes is significant and quite high – it peaks at 20% (№4), 30% (№№5, 11), 40% (№№1, 12, 14) and 45% (№№2, 10) and is not correlated with either spike intensity or its duration. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | Figure 7. Lower limits on the degree of mean intrinsic linear polarization of the spikes, computed according to Eq. 11, versus the peak fluxes. Spikes with low significance polarization (less than 3σ) are in gray, spikes with significant polarization (with significance levels 10−3 − 10−5) – in red. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | In our observations of a giant UV Ceti flare on Dec 28, 2012 we discovered 14 spike bursts near its max- imum, and clearly detected their polarization. Their short durations, sufficiently high intensities and com- parable scales of rise and fading phases, and most im- portantly – their high intrinsic polarization exceeding 30-45% – suggest that these events may only be caused by the synchrotron emission of ultra-relativistic electron streams moving in magnetic fields of the corona. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | Indeed, no other mechanism of emission generation and/or transformation in astrophysical conditions can produce such level of linear polarization. For Thomp- son scattering its degree can’t exceed 10–20% (Angel 1969; Brown & McLean 1977). Linear polarization of bremsstrahlung radiation is typically in 5–25% range (Brown 1972; Emslie et al. 2008). Inverse Compton scattering on the electron beam does not change the state of unpolarized emission, while for the intrin- sic synchrotron (synchrotron-self Compton mechanism) emission it lowers the original polarization degree by several times – its maximal degree is lower than 30- 35% (Bonometto & Saggion 1973; Krawczynski 2012). Therefore, the linear polarization exceeding 35–45% that we detected in sub-second spikes is a direct proof of their synchrotron origin. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | sparse and irregular (see Introduction) polarimetric ob- servations of UV Cet type stars have been fruitless until now (Karpen et al. 1977; Eritsian 1978; Tuominen et al. 1989; Alekseev et al. 1994). It seems that the major- ity of flares, especially the longer ones studied in these works, are dominated by thermal emission. Shorter ones are, however, still may be at least partially driven by synchrotron emission, as our observations strongly sug- gest. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | Below we will discuss possible origin of accelerated electrons, estimate their energies and number densities, and show that they may indeed be naturally formed in UV Ceti corona. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | The multi-wavelength observations of the Sun and so- lar flares, as well as active stars, which have analogous nature of flaring activity (Gershberg 2015), theoretical analysis and numerical simulations have recently made it clear that the structure of magnetic fields here is a complex system of small-scale magnetic knots, multi- ple organized thin loops and regular thread-like struc- tures with minimal scales about 108 – 109 cm or even smaller, and with the magnetic field strength nearly constant along the threads from corona to photosphere (Shibata & Yokoyama 2002; L´opez Fuentes et al. 2008; Meyer et al. 2013; Klimchuk 2015). |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | During the magnetic reconnection in the corona, the collisionless Hall current sheets, which may sponta- neously form in a critical self-organizing state and trig- ger the flaring energy release (Cassak et al. 2008), are being fragmented to separate filaments due to tearing instabilities, and the particles are being accelerated in these small-scale filaments or between them on a short time scales (Drake et al. 2006; Che et al. 2011). |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | interaction of electrons with fast magnetohydrodynam- ical modes during the acceleration (Yan et al. 2008). |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | formed due to acceleration of background thermal particles, subsequently lose their energy radiatively during the motion in a slowly-changing magnetic fields of sep- arate threads, producing the spike bursts we ob- served in UV Ceti flare. Due to stochastic nature of particle acceleration the pitch angle distribution of ejected electrons is isotropic (Dalla & Browning 2005; Minoshima & Yokoyama 2008), and their emission is therefore omnidirectional. Pitch-angle diffusion due to elastic scattering on whistlers (Stepanov et al. 2007) or other fast MHD modes (Yan et al. 2008) both keeps it isotropic and prevents the particles from streaming rapidly along the field lines, keeping them close to the acceleration region during the cool-down. Moreover, if the particle source is powerful enough the strong pitch- angle diffusion regime is realized and a the turbulent “wall” is formed when a cloud of high-energy parti- cles propagates along the magnetic field with the ve- locity of about the phase velocity of waves which is much less than particle velocity (Bespalov et al. 1991; Trakhtengerts & Rycroft 2008). Therefore the geomet- ric effects of emission beaming and finite propagation time may be neglected in the analysis of the spikes. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | Note that the giant flare itself (which seems to be is purely thermal) and spike bursts are produced at differ- ent regions – the former at a loop footpoint in chromo- sphere (see Gershberg (2015) and references therein), while the latters – in the corona itself. Moreover, these phenomena may in principle be produced on two differ- ent stars (as both UV Cet and BL Cet are flaring stars). Of course, the probability of latter case is quite small, but it can not be completely ignored. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | If the spike bursts are indeed caused by synchrotron radiation, we may estimate the range of magnetic field strengths, Lorentz factors and numbers of accelerated electrons necessary to provide their obsreved peak lu- minosities and fading durations, while keeping the emis- sion in U band. For simplicity, and following the argu- ments presented earlier, we will assume the isotropic distribution of electron pitch angles, and will use corre- sponding angle-averaged formulae for their synchrotron emission. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | Using the average luminosity of spikes W = 4.6 × 1027 erg s−1 (see Table 1), B = 1400 Gauss and γ = 700 we get for the number of emitting particles N = 3 × 1030. The scatter of actual spikes’ fading times from 0.11 s to 0.7 s (excluding two longer ones, see Table 1), as well as their luminosities, gives the ranges of γ = 460 − 860, B = 900 − 2300 Gauss, Es = 235 − 440 MeV and N = 4 × 1029 − 8 × 1030, correspondingly. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | Now we may estimate the slope δ of electron energy distribution which is necessary to have N ≈ 4 × 1029 − 8 × 1030 particles accelerated up to energies exceeding Es ≈ 440 MeV to generate observed spike bursts. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | For simplicity we may assume that the accelerated electrons follow the same power-law, dN = N (E)dE ∝ E−δdE, in the wide range of energies from tens of keV up to hundreds of MeVs, which is con- for exam- sistent with observations of solar (see, ple, Ramaty & Mandzhavidze (1994); Kanbach et al. (1993); Lin (2011)) and stellar flares (Smith et al. 2005). |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | The lower energy cutoff E0 for different solar flares have been found to be 10 – 50 keV (Sui et al. 2007; Kontar et al. 2008; Caspi & Lin 2010). For the analysis of synchronous radio and X-ray observations of flaring stars the value of 10 keV has been used (Smith et al. 2005). The maximal energy Em of accelerated elec- trons may be as high as 0.5-1 GeV, as both obser- vations of solar flares (Ramaty & Mandzhavidze 1994; Kanbach et al. 1993; Lin 2011) and theoretical models (Craig & Litvinenko 2002; Litvinenko 2006; Yan et al. 2008) suggest. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | where k is the fraction of thermal electrons with density nt being accelerated during the magnetic reconnection in the filament zone with characteristic size l and vol- ume V = πl3/6 (assuming spherical shape). As an up- per estimate of l we will use the minimal scale of inho- mogeneities in solar (or stellar) corona of 108 − 109 cm (Shibata & Yokoyama 2002; Meyer et al. 2013). The ef- ficiency of thermal particles acceleration k in solar flares it may reach 10%–100% (see for example Lin (2011)). On the other hand, for flares on UV Cet type stars it is not determined yet, and we will consider below the in- terval k = 10−7 − 1. Finally, for the thermal density nt on UV Ceti we will assume the interval from 1010 cm−3 in a quiet state (G¨udel & Naz´e 2009) to 1012 cm−3 dur- ing the flares (Mullan et al. 2006). |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | Figure 8. Allowed power-law slopes δ of electron distribution and fractions k of thermal electrons being accelerated, necessary to generate the observed spike bursts for different parameter val- ues. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | Then we may solve Eqs. 19, 20, 21 and 22 for possi- ble values of δ on k allowed for the aforementioned set of parameters: E0 = 10 − 50 keV, Em = 0.5 − 1 GeV, N = 4 × 1029 − 8 × 1030, nt = 1010 − 1012 cm−3 and l = 108 − 109 cm. The result is shown as a filled re- gion in Figure 8 bounded by the lines with parameters marked there. One can readily see that even for the lowest fraction of accelerated electrons k = 10−7 there are always parameters of coronal plasma that may ex- plain the generation of observed spike bursts, if the electron spectral slope is steeper than δ = 1.7. On the other hand, to have spectral slope flatter than δ = 2 and δ = 3, one have to accelerate more than 10−4% and 1% thermal particles, correspondingly. The former case is valid for any combination of E0, l and N , while the latter – just for some subset of it. The upper limit on δ . 3.4 is placed by the energy density condition of Eq. 22. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | It is clear that the observed spike bursts may be gen- erated for any combination of possible parameters of the corona if one have 1 < δ < 3.4 and k > 10−7. The larger luminosities and/or smaller sizes of active regions correspond to the harder spectra with smaller slopes, to get the necessary amount of electrons with sufficiently large energies. Such values of δ differ from typical slopes of energy spectrum of electrons in solar flares, typically greater than 3 and reaching values of 4 – 6 (Aschwanden 2005). On the other hands, there are evidences for the detection of quite flat spectra of electrons with slopes of 2 – 3 in the flares of UV Ceti type stars (Smith et al. 2005). |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | In our observations of a giant flare of UV Ceti on Dec 28, 2012 we discovered 14 spike bursts near its maximum, and clearly detected their linear polarization, which in- trinsic value exceeds 35% – 40%. These events in such numbers, and the polarization of the flare emission in general, have never been seen before from any UV Ceti type star. We argue that their short durations, suffi- ciently high intensities and comparable scales of rise and fading phases, and most importantly – the polar- ization, suggest that these events may only be caused by the synchrotron emission of ultrarelativistic electrons moving in magnetic fields of the corona. As we demon- strated in Section 4, the UV Ceti corona may indeed possess the conditions – densities and magnetic field strengths – necessary to accelerate significant amount of particles up to the energies of hundreds of MeV pro- ducing the emission in U band with the durations about fractions of a second. Therefore, our results is the first ever evidence for the generation of ultrarelativistic elec- trons with such energies in the coronae of UV Ceti type stars. |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | As a side note, let’s also mention that the presence of very energetic particles in flares of UV Cet type stars may have significant impact on the planets orbit- ing them. Indeed, the fraction of such particles may be ejected away from the star and may significantly worsen the conditions for the appearance and development of life on the planets formally inside the habitable zones around the red dwarfs (Kasting et al. 1993; Tarter et al. 2007). It is important as such a stars are easier targets for exoplanet detection, as the recent observations sug- gest (Guinan et al. 2014; Gillon et al. 2014). |
Processed_Discovery_of_the_subsecond_linearly_polarized_spik.txt | The work has been partially supported by RFBR grant №15-02-0828 and Program №7 of Russian Academy of Sciences. Observations were partially carried out ac- cording to the Russian Government Program of Com- petitive Growth of Kazan Federal University. The the- oretical analysis of the possible influence of red dwarfs activity to habitable planets was performed under the financial support of the grant of Russian Science Foun- dation №14-50-00043. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | the sky-plane speed of the CME to be 2 000 – 2 600 km s−1, i.e., high, but of the same order as preceding non-GLE-related CMEs from the same active region. Hence, the flare itself rather than the CME appears to determine the extreme nature of this event. We therefore conclude that the acceleration, at least, to sub-relativistic energies, of electrons and protons, responsible for both the major flare emissions and the leading spike of SEP/GLE by 07 UT, are likely to have occurred nearly simultaneously within the flare region. However, our analysis does not rule out a probable contribution from particles accelerated in the CME- driven shock for the leading GLE spike, which seemed to dominate at later stages of the SEP event. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | The solar eruptive-flare event of 20 January 2005 has attracted great attention from the solar and solar-terrestrial community due to its outstanding character- istics (see, e.g., http://creme96.nrl.navy.mil/20Jan05/). Despite its occurrence at the deep descending phase of the solar cycle, the event was characterized, in particular, by strong gamma-ray emission with a photon energy up to at least 200 MeV; by one of the strongest microwave bursts with a spectral maximum frequency ≈ 30 GHz, by a fast halo coronal mass ejection (CME), and was accompanied by a very hard-spectrum solar energetic particle (SEP) flux near Earth including the second largest ground-level enhancement (GLE) of cosmic ray intensity in observational history. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | that traveling shocks could perhaps contribute to lower-energy proton fluxes (E < 10 MeV), while higher-energy ones (E > 100 MeV) are flare-accelerated on the Sun (e.g., Klein and Trottet, 2001; Chertok, 1995; Livshits and Belov, 2004; Li et al., 2007a,b). |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | The 20 January 2005 event provides a unique chance to address this problem for the following reasons: (a) availability of spectral-imaging gamma-ray data from the Reuven Ramaty High Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager (RHESSI; Lin et al., 2002), (b) availability of highest-energy spectral gamma-ray data up to 200 MeV from the non-imaging SOlar Neutron and Gamma experiment (SONG; Kuznetsov et al., 2004, 2008) on board the CORONAS-F spacecraft (Oraevsky and Sobelman, 2002), (c) the strongest GLE in over half a century of observations, caused by the unusually prompt arrival of protons at Earth (Bieber et al., 2005; Belov et al., 2005; Simnett, 2006; Cliver, 2006), and (d) availability of many other kinds of observational data, for both the flare region on the Sun, and for the near-Earth space, up to the Earth’s surface. In particular, the source region on the Sun was observed in soft X-rays (SXR) by GOES- 10 and GOES-12 including the Soft X-ray Imager (SXI; Hill et al., 2005). The Hα flare was recorded at the IPS Culgoora Solar Observatory in Australia and at the Hiraiso Observatory in Japan. Nobeyama Radio Polarimeters (NoRP; Nakajima et al., 1985; Torii et al., 1979) recorded an unusually strong microwave burst at six frequencies: 2, 3.75, 9.4, 17, 35, and 80 GHz. The Transition Region and Coronal Explorer (TRACE; Handy et al., 1999) observed the flare after its peak in the 1600 ˚A channel. The Extreme-Ultraviolet Imaging Telescope (EIT; Delaboudini`ere et al., 1995) and the Large-Angle Spectrometric Coronagraph (LASCO; Brueckner et al., 1995) on SOHO also supplied images related to this event. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | the CME are addressed. We conclude that the extreme features of the flare were due to its occurrence in the strong magnetic fields just above sunspot umbrae. Section 3 is devoted to relating flare features to the observed SEP/GLE char- acteristics. In particular, its proton productivity is compared with other events from the same active region. Finally, the temporal parameters of the impulsive parts of the gamma-ray burst and GLE are compared. The same population of energetic particles appears to be responsible for both the π0-decay gamma-ray burst and the leading spike of the GLE. In turn, the π0-decay emission was close, but not identical to, emissions whose sources were located within the solar active region. In Section 4, we discuss the results of our analysis and argue that the π0-decay emission also originated in the flare region and that data available to us appear to favor the flare-related initial acceleration of particles responsible for the leading GLE spike, but do not preclude their origin in a CME-driven shock. Section 5 summarizes the results of our analyses of the flare and origin of SEP/GLE particles and briefly addresses their implications. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | The eruptive solar event of 20 January 2005 had several outstanding properties. Many solar events are known, but only a small number of them are compara- ble with this event in some of its features. The high-energy near-Earth proton enhancement was unprecedented. Since 1975, more than 600 proton events with EP > 100 MeV have been registered; however, high-energy proton fluxes ex- ceeded 100 pfu in only five events. On 20 January 2005, the peak flux for EP > 100 MeV protons reached the record value of 650 pfu. At lower energies, the near-Earth proton flux was not extremely intense, about 2000 pfu. A very strong, collimated high-energy beam-like proton stream arrived at the Earth’s orbit almost simultaneously with electromagnetic flare emissions and produced the GLE, which was the largest one in the last solar cycle and one of the largest ever observed (Belov et al., 2005; Simnett, 2006; Bieber et al., 2005; Cliver, 2006). The largest effect, by an order of magnitude, was recorded with antarctic neutron monitors. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | Strong hard X-ray (HXR) and pronounced gamma-ray emissions up to 17 MeV were recorded with RHESSI (Krucker, Hurford, and Lin, 2005; Hurford et al., 2006b; Share et al., 2006). CORONAS-F/SONG detected gamma-rays of > 100 MeV. Only a few solar events are known in which such high-energy gamma-rays have been recorded (e.g., Ryan, 2000). |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | The CME launched in this event was well observed with SOHO/LASCO in only one C2 frame at ≈ 4.4R⊙ (06:541). Subsequent LASCO frames are severely contaminated with traces of energetic particles; thus, the CME speed is rather uncertain. Gopalswamy et al. (2005) estimated it to be up to 3242 km s−1, and the estimate of Simnett (2006) was 2500 km s−1. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | in soft X-ray and Hα emissions (X7.1/2B). We analyze the properties of this superevent and show some of them to be interrelated. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | The event of 20 January 2005 occurred in active region 10720 (N14 W60). This region evolved rapidly. Its evolution is shown by photospheric magnetograms observed with the Michelson Doppler Imager (MDI; Scherrer et al., 1995) on SOHO. Figure 1 presents a set of MDI magnetograms of AR 10720 from 13 through 19 January. Differential rotation is compensated to 15 January, 00 UT. The magnetograms show two major domains, the northern one of S-polarity (dark), and the southern one of N-polarity (bright). |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | From 15 January onwards, the maximum magnetic field strength exceeded the measurable capabilities of the MDI2. This shows up as a darker patch 3 within the bright N-polarity domain. On 20 January, the active region was not far from the limb, leading to significant distortions of the magnetograms. We therefore refer to a magnetogram obtained on 18 January3. On this day, the maximum strength in a “non-saturated” part of the N-polarity area reached +3120 G, while the persistence of patch 3 in this area suggests the magnetic field to be even stronger there. The maximum strength in the S-polarity area was −2700 G. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | Noticeable during 13 – 20 January are (1) large shear motion along the neutral line, clearly visible from the westward drift of the westernmost S-polarity spot 1, and (2) the displacement of the large northern S-polarity domain 2 southwards, approaching the N-domain, while the latter maintained its latitude. This con- vergence brought the opposite-polarity areas into contact on 17 January. These features of its development suggest the high flare productivity of AR 10720 (cf., e.g., Birn et al., 2000). Indeed, it produced 17 M-class and 5 X-class events from 14 through 23 January. Many of these were associated with CMEs. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | Figure 2. Pre-flare situation. TRACE WL image (left); TRACE 1600 ˚A image (middle) and SOHO/MDI magnetogram (right) overlaid with contours of the sunspot umbrae visible in the WL image. All images are “co-rotated” to 06:52:30 UT. Axes in all images hereafter show the distance in arcsec from the solar disk center. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | The area of the largest N-polarity sunspot’s umbra is about 1.74 larger than the largest S-polarity one. All of these properties of the sunspots imply that the real magnetic field is probably stronger in the N-polarity umbra, while its total magnetic flux is certainly larger. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | The evolution of AR 10720 clearly points to a high flare productivity, which indeed took place. Its magnetic fields reached extreme strengths. The active region became “ready” to produce its strongest flare. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | The event was observed in X-rays and gamma-rays by RHESSI5 and CORON- AS-F/SONG. Panels a – c of Figure 3 show some of the wide-band RHESSI time profiles (four second sampling rate) produced using RHESSI Data Analysis Software. The time profiles in a range of 3 – 25 keV (e.g., panel a) are similar and smooth, with their maxima significantly delayed with respect to those of higher energies, most likely due to the Neupert effect, which we discuss later. Harder emissions became strong at 06:42:40, while softer X-ray emissions started earlier, probably due to initial heating. The time profiles in a range of 25 – 300 keV are similar. They seem saturated around the flare peak (this effect can be compensated for, see Section 2.2.2). The highest-energy time profiles (not shown) lag behind those of 25 – 300 keV and rise sharply after 06:45. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | Figure 3. a – c: Some wide-band RHESSI time profiles (red). Green dash-dotted line shows start of TRACE observations. Black dashed line marks a weak enhancement of 25 – 300 keV emission. Red dotted line shows part of its time profile enlarged ten-times. c – f: Some SONG time profiles smoothed over 13 points (blue; the 200 – 800 keV channel has not been smoothed). |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | by subtracting background trends inferred from previous orbits. The gamma-ray burst was reliably recorded from 06:43:30 to 06:58:30, then uncertainties become large due to contamination from charged particles reaching the spacecraft. The 43 – 230 keV channels suffer from register overflow. Flux variations recorded with RHESSI and SONG in corresponding energy bands are close, any dissimilarities are probably due to differences in energy bands. The differences in count rates (e.g., panel c) are due to different detectors. Two peaks at about 06:45 and 06:46 are detectable in the records of both instruments. The hardest emissions rise sharply after 06:45:30. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | The time profiles in 50 – 100 keV and 200 – 800 keV bands are largely similar. These time profiles and the highest-energy (> 60 MeV) emissions have some similarities as well as differences. The highest-energy gamma-rays start later than lower-energy emissions, rise sharper, and decay slower. On the other hand, subsidiary peaks in the > 60 MeV band at 06:46, 06:46:30, and 06:47:15 have pronounced counterparts in lower-energy bands. They are also detectable in intermediate-energy bands, which are not shown. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | Culgoora Solar Observatory observed the Hα flare every 20 seconds from 06:40:47 to 08:04. Figure 4 shows some of these images overlaid with contours of the sunspot umbrae from the TRACE WL image (see Figure 2). One can see the development of Hα flare ribbons with respect to sunspots starting from the onset of the HXR emission up to its cessation (maximum of SXR emission). Initially, Hα emission comes from the future southern ribbon, being concentrated in the sunspot umbra. The emission south of this sunspot is due to weaker initial flaring. At 06:43, when HXR emission becomes strong, Hα emission appears in the northern sunspot umbra. Later on, the northern ribbon was significantly extended toward the southeast. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | The limited resolution of the Hα images and atmospheric effects do not permit consideration of bright kernels, but it is possible to study larger features. Fig- ure 5a shows time profiles of the total Hα emission computed separately for each ribbon. Their similarity suggests a single common source for their emissions. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | Figure 6 shows the relative positions of 50 – 100 keV HXR sources, sunspots, and flare ribbons around the time of the main flare phase. At 06:40:45, both HXR sources are located in the sunspot umbrae. The active northern source shifts firstly east along the ribbon, and then, when HXR flux sharply increases, it returns to the umbra. Then, it extends along the ribbon, and during the maximum phase moves to the east. The southern source is much steadier. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | HXR sources are located on the Hα ribbons. Similar development of the flare ribbons and HXR sources is also shown by a movie of this event6, TRACE 1600 ˚A + RHESSI/SXR & HXR. Hα and HXR images show the following features: (a) both ribbons cross the umbrae of sunspots, (b) initially, HXR and Hα emission sources are located in the sunspot umbrae, and then, after 06:45, the northern source shifts from the umbra to a region of weaker magnetic fields; the gamma-ray emission maximum occurs just at this time, and (c) the displacements of the southern HXR and Hα sources are relatively small. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | To compute spatially-resolved HXR time profiles, we produced 50 – 100 keV RHESSI images using the Pixon method. Figure 5b shows HXR time profiles computed separately for each ribbon. Again, the time profiles of both ribbons are so similar as to suggest a common source for their emissions. The Hα time profiles are much smoother than those of HXR and lag behind them due to the well-known long decay time of Hα emission. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | Figure 5. Time profiles of the average brightness (arbitrary units) computed separately for northern (dotted) and southern (solid) ribbons: Hα (a, Culgoora Solar Observatory), 50 – 100 keV hard X-rays (b, RHESSI). Dash-dotted line: start of TRACE observations. Enlarged time profiles show a weak enhancement of the HXR emission around 06:55. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | Figure 6. 50 – 100 keV hard X-ray sources (RHESSI, integration time 30 seconds, blue con- tours) overlying the TRACE WL image (gray scale). Green contours delineate flare ribbons in TRACE 1600 ˚A image at 06:52:30. All images are referred to RHESSI pointing. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | of Hα and 1600 ˚A emissions from lower layers of the solar atmosphere. Therefore, a correlation is expected between the positions and time profiles of HXR and 1600 ˚A sources. TRACE had a break in observations between 06:18 and 06:52:30; afterwards, it showed well-developed flare ribbons. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | Using variance and correlation analyses (Grechnev, 2003; Slemzin, Kuzin, and Bogachev, 2005) of TRACE 1600 ˚A images observed during 06:52:41 – 06:57:30, we revealed several pairs of kernels with variable brightness (cf. Su et al., 2006). The paired kernels, located in different ribbons with similar time profiles, suggest a common source of precipitated electrons. They most likely rep- resent conjugate footpoints of the loops connecting them (cf. Grechnev, Kundu, and Nindos, 2006). Unlike the main phase of the flare, the kernels were located at the outer sides of the ribbons, far from the sunspot’s umbrae. This outward motion corresponds to the expansion of the ribbons. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | We then performed the variance and correlation analyses for the RHESSI 50 – 100 keV images produced using the CLEAN method over the same time interval, when the HXR emission was enhanced (see Figures 3, 5). It revealed regions with a configuration corresponding closely with the TRACE 1600 ˚A kernels, but displaced by [+7.5′′, −10.5′′]. This provided us with the information required to coalign TRACE and RHESSI images with an accuracy of the order of ≈ 1′′. This also confirms that the ribbons represent the bases of closed loops. As established in Sections 2.2.1 – 2.2.3, atypically, the flare ribbons in this event crossed the sunspot umbrae. The coronal configuration above the ribbons was closed. During the main phase, the brightest Hα and HXR emissions came from the sunspot umbrae. The flare occurred in very strong magnetic fields. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | As Figure 3 shows, the spectrum became harder after 06:45 UT. Figure 7 presents the non-thermal parts of the spectra recorded with RHESSI and SONG just after the flare peak. The detailed RHESSI spectrum was computed using the OSPEX software. The SONG spectrum (Kuznetsov et al., 2007) extends up to the highest energies. Data from both instruments largely agree with each other quantitatively; however, the lowest SONG band suffers from overflow, while the absolute calibration of highest-energy RHESSI data is preliminary. One can distinguish several components in both spectra. These components correspond to the expected electron-bremsstrahlung and nuclear gamma-ray features. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | The RHESSI spectrum shows a prompt electron-positron annihilation line of 511 keV and a delayed neutron-capture line of 2.22 MeV. The most intense is the discrete 2.22 MeV line, which is emitted in neutron capture on hydrogen. Neutrons appear in nuclear reactions of accelerated ions, streaming down to the photosphere, with its material. Neutrons undergo thermalization in ≈80 seconds, and some of them are eventually captured on hydrogen, H + n → 2H + γ, with the emission of a 2.22 MeV photon. Thus, the discrete 2.22 MeV line is indicative of accelerated ions with an energy exceeding a few MeV. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | Figure 7. High-resolution RHESSI (red) and wide-range SONG (blue) spectra recorded dur- ing the hardest flare emission. Vertical dash-dotted line shows the high-energy part of the SONG spectrum where the π0-decay emission dominates. Shading shows uncertainties. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | The discrete 2.22 MeV line emission, which is indicative of the precipitation of accelerated protons and heavier ions, is strong enough to allow one to construct an image of its source. We computed it from RHESSI data using the Pixon method. To compare it with the bremsstrahlung component, we also produced a RHESSI image in a band of 100 – 300 keV for the interval of 06:46:00 – 06:46:30 using the Pixon method. This imaging interval corresponds to strong high-energy gamma-ray emission. Positions and configurations of HXR sources at 50 – 100 keV and 100 – 300 keV are close for as long as they are detectable (see Hurford et al., 2006b; Share et al., 2006). |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | Figure 8. (a) Contours of RHESSI HXR, SXR, and gamma-ray images overlying the TRACE WL image at 06:00 shown as gray scale background. Yellow star: 2.22 MeV line centroid (1σ er- ror size), blue contours: 100 – 300 keV image at 06:46:00 – 06:46:30, [20, 50, 80]%; red contours: 3 – 25 keV, 06:41:00 – 06:48:30, [30, 50, 80]%; green contours: flare ribbons from TRACE 1600 ˚A image at 06:52:30. “N” and “S” denote polarities of the main magnetic domains. (b) Dimmings revealed from EIT 195 ˚A images and the loop-like structure (red) visible in the EIT 171 ˚A band. Turquoise frame: field of view of panel (a). |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | with its centroid (yellow star) being in the northern ribbon. The positions of the sources in Figure 8a agree with those presented by Hurford et al. (2006b). |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | When gamma-ray emission reached its maximum, the northern HXR source became extended, with its eastern part coincident with the 2.22 MeV source. Independent of instrumental limitations and collimation of particle streams, the fact that the 2.22 MeV line source centroid was aligned with a flare ribbon means that accelerated ions precipitated in the region, where coronal structures were closed at that time. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | peak in soft X-rays, the emission from the whole Sun was dominated by this large loop-like structure. It was detectable in SXI images up to at least 08 UT and then its emission gradually declined. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | To estimate its parameters, we produced a spectrum from RHESSI averaged data over 06:46 – 06:47 using OSPEX software. Then, we fitted the spectrum with a single thermal component dominating up to 25 – 30 keV, and a single power-law component. These estimations provide a temperature of Te ≈ 32 MK and a total emission measure of EM≈ 7.6 × 1049 cm−3. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | After 07 UT, an apparently expanding arcade appears in 1600 ˚A, Hα, and EUV images well below the large SXR-emitting structure. The loops of this arcade are detectable in SOHO/EIT and GOES/SXI images up to the end of the day. This arcade does not seem to be directly associated with the SXR- emitting loop-like structure. The paired kernels revealed from the analysis of HXR and 1600 ˚A images during the enhancement around 06:55, well after the main flare peak, do not coincide with the footpoints of the loop-like structure and most likely show the formation of the arcade underneath. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | From 06:54 onwards, SOHO/EIT and LASCO frames become increasingly contaminated by the traces of high-energy particles impacting the CCD detector (cf. Andrews, 2001), and after 07:14 the images become indecipherable. This effect indicates that protons with EP > 40 MeV and up to at least 400 MeV reached SOHO (Didkovsky et al., 2006). Nevertheless, it is possible to reveal the structure of the coronal dimming using several frames (Grechnev, 2004; Chertok and Grechnev, 2005). Figure 8b shows a dimming “portrait” composed of minima over each pixel in the EIT 195 ˚A fixed-base (06:24:10) difference frames from 06:36 through 09:19 UT (this EIT channel has a temperature sensitivity maximum at 1.3 MK). Dimmings are seen as rather large, dark areas, while the red-filled contour shows a bright, overexposed image of the loop-like structure recorded in the EIT 171 ˚A channel. “Twin” dimmings are located near the ends of the post-eruptive arcade (here its image is inside a bright area) northwest and southwest of the ribbons and the large loop-like structure (cf. Figure 8a). The 2.22 MeV line source, like the other major flare sources, is located far from the dimming regions. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | Figure 9 shows in panel (a) soft X-ray light curves recorded with GOES-10 (dashed) and GOES-12 (solid). We have computed a total emission measure EM (b) and an average temperature Te (c) from two GOES bands (White, Thomas, and Schwartz, 2005). These values over 06:46 – 06:47 are close to those computed from RHESSI data for the same time interval. Because the large loop- like structure alone produced practically the whole solar SXR emission around the flare peak, we estimate the plasma density in this structure (Figure 9d) taking its parameters from SXR images, i.e., width of a leg ≈ 9 × 108 cm, footpoint separation ≈ 2.5 × 109 cm, height ≈ 4 × 109 cm, volume ≈ 3.5 × 1027 cm3, and a visible area of the whole loop, 4 × 1018 cm2. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | Figure 9. GOES-10 (dashed) and GOES-12 (solid) soft X-ray flux density (a), emission measure (b), temperature (c), and density (d). (e) Neupert effect. Normalized time profile of the 300 – 800 keV (red) emission in comparison with microwaves at 35 GHz (blue) and a derivative of the soft X-ray flux at 1 – 8 ˚A (GOES-10, green). |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | Total flux records from NoRP (Figure 10a – f) show a huge radio burst with its flux density reaching almost 105 sfu. A strong emission up to 5 × 104 sfu was recorded even at 80 GHz. The 80 GHz data had calibration problems (up to June 2005), which we fixed by means of a time-dependent correction inferred using hard copies of records from the detector of the radiometer. The time profiles at 17, 35, 80 GHz, and at 300 – 800 keV (dotted line in Figure 10d – f) are similar, thus suggesting a closeness of the sources responsible for radio and hard electromagnetic emissions. Until the onset of the π0-decay emission at 06:45, features detectable at most frequencies correspond. The time profiles over 17 – 80 GHz start to show more fluctuations at this time (about 06:52). The microwave flux densities at these frequencies reach their maxima within the interval of 06:46 – 06:47, which corresponds to the maximum of the hardest gamma-rays emissions. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | Figure 11 presents radio spectra computed from the NoRP data before, dur- ing, and after the flare maximum, with each point averaged over 5 seconds. The turnover frequency νpeak computed using interpolation is shown in Figure 10g. It is ≈ 30 GHz around the peak time, suggesting that microwaves came mainly from the strongest-field regions above the sunspots’ umbrae. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | The microwave spectral index computed from the ratios of fluxes at the highest frequencies is very hard, α ∼< 1. The spectra imply, however, that the slope at frequencies >80 GHz could be steeper, and real α larger. The electron power-law index corresponding to the optically thin limit is δ ≈ 2.5 (Dulk, 1985). From the HXR spectrum we found δ ≈ 4.4 − 4.5. The trapping effect hardens the microwave-emitting electron spectrum up to δ − 2 (Silva, Wang, and Gary, 2000). Hence, a plausible power-law index of microwave-emitting electrons on 20 January 2005 was δ ≈ 2.5 − 3.5. |
Processed_An_Extreme_Solar_Event_of_20_January_2005:_Propert.txt | Near the peak of the burst, the density inferred from GOES data is n0 ≈ 7 × 1010 cm−3. With an emitting region depth of 2 × 108 cm and the usually assumed relative number of accelerated electrons nacc/n0 = 10−4, one estimates a magnetic field strength of B ≈ 1500 − 2200 G (Dulk, 1985). Thus, a large number of hard-spectrum electrons were gyrating in very strong magnetic fields. Since two sources in adjacent footpoints of a loop emit, the turnover frequency in the stronger-field footpoint was still higher. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.