Datasets:

SouthernCrossAI
/

Arxiv

Dataset card Data Studio Files Files and versions Community

Split (1)

train · 132k rows

Filename stringlengths 22 64	Paragraph stringlengths 8 5.57k
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	It was realised a long time ago (see [11], and, for a re- cent review [12]) that the strong CP-problem is a prob- lem of the quasi-classical treatment of the QCD func- tional integral built into the representation Eq. (3), and that incorporation of the long-range gluon conﬁgurations responsible for conﬁnement could potentially remove this problem. However to date no way has been found to achieve this and maintain simultaneously the resolution of the UA(1) problem traditionally attributed to instan- tons. Scenarios based on the existence of an additional boson, the axion, have been suggested and have become canonical ([12, 13]).
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	The QCD motivated model we shall consider in this article is the domain model [5, 8, 9, 10]. For complete- ness and clear identiﬁcation of the origin of the eﬀect discussed in this article a comment about the choice of boundary conditions in the domain model is in order. The ﬁeld B is considered as a background ﬁeld and is subject to the condition Eq.(6). The system is consid- ered in a large but ﬁnite volume V . The total volume is split into a large number of subvolumes – domains. The ﬂuctuation quark ﬁelds are deﬁned by the bag-like conditions on the domain boundaries. The characteristic size of a domain is much smaller than the characteris- tic size of the total volume. The thermodynamic limit is understood as the limit when the size of the total vol- ume goes to inﬁnity together with the number of domains while the size of domains stays ﬁnite. This construction is suﬃcient for deﬁning and for practical calculation of the Euclidean functional integral for the partition func- tion. It should be stressed that bag-like conditions are very diﬀerent from the (quasi-)periodic conditions typical for formulations based on a compactiﬁcation of R4 to the torus. The most important feature for our considerations is that the spectrum λ of the Dirac operator under bag- like boundary conditions is asymmetric with respect to λ λ, while (quasi-)periodic boundary conditions lead to a symmetric spectrum. In particular, this asymmetry is responsible for the formation of the quark condensate and resolution of the UA(1) problem in the model as is discussed in detail in [9]. Nevertheless, there is no contra- diction between our results and canonical considerations based on torus-like compactiﬁcations of R4 [14]. These are just two diﬀerent complementary statements of the problem.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	Within the domain model the mechanism for resolving the strong CP-problem is realised in the following way.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	is nonzero, independent of θ, and satisﬁes the anomalous Ward identity, which indicates a correct implementation of the UA(1) symmetry. In particular, in the chiral limit the mass of the η′ is expressed via the topological suc- ceptibility χYM of pure gluodynamics in agreement with the Witten-Veneziano formula.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	of such critical points exist in the interval θ [ which results in the standard strong CP problem.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	To apply a mechanical analogy, an irrational value of Q leads to a picture which is reminiscent of ergodic motion resulting in a dense winding of a torus by a trajectory [16], while motion over closed trajectories can be associ- ated with rational Q.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	This article is devoted to an investigation of this mech- anism on the basis of the domain model of QCD vac- uum [5, 8, 9, 10]. We omit here all details related to the motivation, formulation and numerous results of the model given in the above papers, apart from those which are speciﬁcally needed here. In the next two sections the θ dependence in the model under consideration is eluci- dated. The Witten-Veneziano mass formula, Gell-Mann– Oakes–Renner relation, the anomalous Ward identity and ηππ decay are speciﬁcally discussed in section IV. The ﬁnal section is devoted to explanation of the relation be- tween the mechanism of the strong CP resolution in the domain model and the Poincar´e recurrence theorem of ergodic theory which justiﬁes the title of the present pa- per.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	are continuous at ∂Vi. Such continuity conditions Eq.(10) ﬁx the parameters α, βa to be the same at all singular surfaces.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	Thus the anomalous part of free energy density, that in- volving the topological charge q, is independent of the βa which manifests the Abelian property of the anomaly. The signiﬁcance of Eq.(10) is that it is derived directly from the domain ansatz for the QCD vacuum but also corresponds to the zero momentum limit of the eﬀective chiral Lagrangian of [7] up to the somewhat diﬀerent en- coding of the anomaly. A task in the following is then verifying that this encoding of the symmetries of low en- ergy phenomenology reproduces the expected phenomena of spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking and resolution of the UA(1) problem but more importantly that it also solves the strong CP problem within this QCD vacuum approach.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	Thus due to the anomaly the continuous UA(1) is reduced to a discrete group of chiral transformations connecting the minima Eq.(16) with each other. In the absence of additional sources violating chiral symmetries like quark masses, this discrete symmetry is suﬃcient to provide for zero mean values of all chirally non-invariant operators.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	of distinct minima and all others are 2π-equivalent to one of these minima. In other words, there is a periodic structure which allows one to split the set Eq. (16) into ﬁnite number of equivalence classes.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	k2, l2) a with m(k1, l1\| number in the interval (0, 2π) which is diﬀerent for any pair (k1, l1\| = l2. Unlike the case of ratio- nal q where only several numbers δ arise, the set of all k2, l2) is dense in the interval (0, 2π) for irrational δ(k1, l1\| q. The periodicity, typical for a rational q, is lost for ir- rational values of q and the set of all minima cannot be split into 2π-equivalence classes. However, these discrete minima of the free energy are separated by inﬁnite en- ergy barriers in the inﬁnite volume limit, and no ﬂavour singlet Goldstone modes are expected.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	For any real q this discrete symmetry and contin- uous non-singlet ﬂavour chiral symmetry are sponta- neously broken, which becomes manifest if the inﬁnites- imal masses are switched on. The term linear in masses in Eq. (10) selects a minimum for which αkl(θ) and the Nf ﬂavour non-singlet angles βa maximise i mi cos(Φi). There are speciﬁc values of the θ which are critical in the sense that two diﬀerent minima αkl(θc) and αk′l′ (θc) are degenerate in the presence of a mass term; these degen- erate minima are CP-conjugates. The so-called Dashen phenomenon occurs [15]: CP is broken spontaneously for θ = θc while for non-critical values CP is explicitly bro- ken. For rational q there is only a ﬁnite number of θc in the interval ( π, π], which includes [7, 18] the value Irrational values of q lead to a drastically dif- θ = π. ferent picture: the set of critical values θc is dense in R. In other words, any real value of θ is either critical or is a limit of a Cauchy sequence of critical values. CP is broken spontaneously in any arbitrarily small vicin- ity of any real value of θ, in particular in the vicinity of θ = 0. Understood in the sense of limiting values, the pseudoscalar condensate vanishes in both CP-conjugate vacua. The qualitative (and, in a sense, dramatic) diﬀer- ence in the consequences of q being rational or irrational is illustrated in Fig.1.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	Note, that at θ = 0 CP is just an exact symmetry, it is not broken at all (neither spontaneously, nor explicitly). The point θ = 0 is a limiting point of a set of critical points but it does not belong to this set: θ = 0 itself is not critical. Thus there is no contradiction with the Vafa-Witten theorem [19].
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	FIG. 1: The scalar (A and B) and pseudoscalar (C and D) quark condensates as functions of θ for Nf = 3 in units of ℵ. The plots A and C are for rational q = 0.15, while B and D correspond to any irrational q, for instance to q = 3 2.02π2 = 0.15047 . . . which is numerically only slightly diﬀerent from 0.15. The dashed lines in A and C correspond to discrete minima of the free energy density which are degenerate for m ≡ 0. The solid bold lines denote the minimum which is chosen by an inﬁnitesimally small mass term for a given θ. Points on the solid line in A, where two dashed lines cross each other, correspond to critical values of θ, at which CP is broken spontaneously. This is signalled by the discontinuity in the pseudoscalar condensate in C. For irrational q, as illustrated in B and D, the dashed lines densely cover the strip between 1 and −1, and the set of critical values of θ turns out to be dense in R. As will be discussed in the last section, an analogy can be seen between A (C) and motion on a torus over a closed trajectory, while a manifestation of the Poincar´e recurrence theorem resulting in dense winding of a torus (for example, see [16]) can be recognised in B (D).
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	This takes into account that for irrational q one has cos[αkl(θ)] = 1 and sin[αkl(θ)] = 0 for any θ (see the bold solid lines in plots B and D in Fig.1). Using our identiﬁcation of with the quark condensate, we thus re- cover the Gell-Mann–Oakes–Renner relation for masses of pions (a = 1, 2, 3) and the eta-meson (a = 8).
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	For q irrational this term exactly vanishes: the decay η ππ is exactly suppressed. For q rational, we can expand Eq.(20) in the vicinity of θ = 0 using Eq.(16) π/Fπ)π8(π0)2 which is the analogue and obtain of Eq. (8) in [20] (and similar results elsewhere) for three degenerate quarks. In the context of approaches such as [20], there is an a priori assumption that one can ex- pand in small θ: the θ dependence is ﬁrst chirally rotated from the topological charge density term into the quark mass terms and then an expansion performed for small quark mass. Using the small upper bound of the neu- tron dipole moment [21] such considerations lead to the expectation of an unusually small value for θ, leading to the familiar ﬁne-tuning problem. However, in the context of irrational topological charge in the domain model, as a particular study of the class of ﬁelds speciﬁed by the condition Eq.(6) where the θ dependence can be handled exactly, we see that such an expansion misses the possibil- ity of the cancellation of CP-conjugate vacua in CP-odd quantities. The absence of CP-violating hadronic pro- cesses such as η ππ (or, if baryons could be included in these considerations, a neutron dipole moment) is not then indicative of vanishing θ; physical observables are independent of θ, as in Figs.1(B,D), and still CP symme- try is exact in QCD with condensates, conﬁnement and the correct realisation of chiral symmetry, even in the presence of the θ term.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	with ZV (0) = 1. The sum above runs over all local min- ima of the free energy, enumerated by k, l.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	It can thus be extracted from the partition function by the double variation with respect to θ. It is important to note here that this relies on changing the order of taking the derivatives with respect to θ and functional integra- tion, which is well-deﬁned only for a certain regularized In particular the total form of the functional integral. volume V must be large but ﬁnite. In our context it means that the diﬀerentiation of Eq.(22) with respect to θ must be performed before taking the thermodynamic . When V is large but ﬁnite ZV (θ) de- limit N pends on theta. After the second derivative over θ is taken the limit N chooses the global minimum, i.e. l, k corresponding to the global minimum. The key θ there point here is that for irrational q, exist integers (l, k) (specifying the vacuum αkl(θ)) such that 1 cos(θ/Nf + 2πl/q/Nf ) < ǫ. The existence of such a minimum eliminates dependence of observables on θ. Moreover, taking the limit θ 0 is unnecessary in 0 omitted, Eq. (23): as deﬁned by Eq. (23) but with θ the CP-even quantity χ does not depend on θ. We re- peat though that the most important point here is that diﬀerentiation with respect to θ and the thermodynamic limit are not interchangable; but deriving with respect to θ ﬁrst is precisely how χ is obtained through Eq. (23).
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	It is instructive to compare some aspects of the pic- tures arising for rational (in particular, integer) versus ir- rational values of q. The fundamental diﬀerence between these two cases is clearly seen in Fig. 1 but still requires precise formulation. As a matter of fact, plots (A,B) rep- resent all inequivalent curves cos[αkl(θ)] while (C,D) show all inequivalent curves sin[αkl(θ)].
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	First of all, for rational q there is a ﬁnite number nc of critical points ( , i = 1, . . . , nc) in the inter- { val π < θ π and a countable set of critical points − ≤ Z) in R, distributed θi , c + 2πj ( { (2π/nc)-periodically in R. In particular, θ = 0 is not critical while θ = π is critical for any rational q. The number of critical values nc is determined by the integer numerator q1 of a rational number Nf q = q1/q2. For π already contains a π < θ irrational q the interval ≤ θi countable set of critical points ( ) which , i = 1, . . . , c} { ∞ R we have either a is dense in this interval. Thus θ ∈ ∀ critical point or a limiting point of a sequence of critical points. In particular, θ = 0 is such a limiting point for any irrational q.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	Irrational values of q change this behaviour radically: (j = = 1 is the limiting point of a sequence {Cj(θ) } C ε > 0 and 1, . . . , ∀ j > Jε(θ). Simulta- θ ∀ ∃ Sj(θ) = sin[αj(θ)]. neously ∀ θ and thus The dependence of Jε on θ is discontinuous the sum in Eq. (22) in the inﬁnite volume limit represents the function ZV (θ) which, strictly speaking, is not diﬀer- entiable θ. However, for ﬁnite volume, each term in the series is a diﬀerentiable function and the sum, regularised by L < , can be diﬀerentiated term by term, with a subsequent taking of the limits V, L → ∞ which are well deﬁned. In this sense Eq. (22) gives a prescription for computing derivatives with respect to θ. To underscore that the character of the θ dependence realised in the domain model does not represent anything unusual or “exotic” it is useful to map the above consid- erations to some textbook examples of application of the Poincar´e recurrence theorem – one of the corner stones of ergodic theory (for example, see [16]).
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	FIG. 2: Values of θl = glθ as deﬁned in Eq. (26): boxes occur for rational q = q1/q2 with q1Nf = 3, while circles represent some of the points densely distributed, in particular, in the neighborhood of θ = 0 for irrational q.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	According to the Poincar´e recurrence theorem, for any rational b there exists a number lb such that θlb = θ. The points represented in Fig. 2 by the boxes correspond to the elements of the group. For any irrational b the set is dense on the circle everywhere, particularly in the vicinity of θ = 0 as is illustrated by the ﬁlled circles in Fig. 2. Identifying the θ-parameter of QCD with the polar angle in Fig. 2 and the parameter b with the “topological charge” q by b = 1/Nf q establishes the desired map.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	correspondence between the curves densely covering the strip in plot B to the motion of a point on a torus over the trajectory densely covering the torus.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	If we were to take the liberty of extrapolating the QCD motivated domain model considerations of this paper to genuine QCD, then we would conclude that for the class ] taking rational values the of background ﬁelds with Q[ A UA(1) problem can be solved but at the cost of simulta- neously inviting the strong CP problem. On the other hand, irrational values of Q[ ] are as natural for QCD with nonzero gluon condensates as rational (in particular, integer) values but providing clear signatures of resolving the UA(1) problem without creating the CP problem in strong interactions.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	which might hold for only one value of θ (eg θ = 0) or, ideally, may somehow hold for all θ.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	i X but cosine could just as well be replaced here by sine. This condition emerges from previous conditions but only in the presence [18] of the Dashen phenomenon at least at θ = π.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	Each of these conditions is realised in the domain model [10] and has appeared in previous sections of this paper. In the following we shall only derive results from these equations.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	choice leads to the statement in [18] that CP-invariance at θ = 0 ﬁxes unambiguously the integration constant from Eq.(29).
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	The conclusion we draw is that the spectrum of solu- tions to the theta dependence of the QCD Ward identi- ties is rich enough to exhibit the behaviour seen in and originally derived in an explicit QCD motivated model, the domain model, which solves the strong CP-problem. However the interpretation of the parameter ξ is possible at this stage only within the model, namely as the mean value of a fraction of the topological charge related to the space-time regions where the dominating gluon conﬁgu- rations in the QCD vacuum can be considered as homo- geneous, or succinctly – the mean topological charge per domain.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	ACK was supported by the Australian Research Coun- cil. SNN was supported by the DFG, contract SM70/1- 1 and partially by the grant RFBR 04-02-17370. ACK thanks R.J. Crewther and B.-Y. Park for helpful discus- sions. SNN is grateful to G. Eﬁmov, A. Isaev, V. Pa- poyan, O. Shevchenko and O. Teryaev for clarifying dis- cussions.
Processed_Poincaré_recurrence_theorem_and_the_strong_CP-prob.txt	tion of Eq.(4) has to be understood in the sense of h: g2F a µν(x) :i = 4 limV →∞h: g2SV :i/V , where the normal ordering symbol : · · · : means subtraction of perturbative contributions, or more concisely normal or- dering with respect to the perturbative vacuum. Under this prescription both sides of Eq.(4) are UV ﬁnite. The UV ﬁnite and RG invariant quantity h: g2F a µν (x) :i is the lowest gluon condensate of the OPE and QCD sum rules. Usually however this “normal ordering” is implicit and ommitted in notation for the gluon condensate.
Processed_MTF_Optimization_in_Digital_Dental_X-ray_Systems.txt	Abstract In this work, we have studied the MTF optimisation relative to the detector aperture of four digital dental X-ray image systems: 1) Digora and Denoptix systems, based on PSPL detectors; 2) CDR and Sens-A-Ray 2000, based on CCD detectors. The MTF was evaluated by ERF method and linearized as a Gaussian process. The CCD based systems presented Gaussian characteristics. The PSPL based systems presented a composition of two Gaussian processes. We conclude that one process is due to the laser and stimulated light scattering inside the PSPL plate and the other is due to the laser beam focal aperture. Matching focal aperture to laser scattering allows the optimization of the PSPL systems resolution. An optimal pixel width found to be 62 µm.
Processed_MTF_Optimization_in_Digital_Dental_X-ray_Systems.txt	Introduction Digital X-ray image systems are commonly available in today general radiology. The most used direct digital X-ray transducers are the amorphous selenium (a-Se) and silicon (a-Si) photoconductive solid-state detectors, charge-coupled devices (CCD) and photo-stimulable phosphor luminescence (PSPL) detectors. Matching the aperture of the detector to its physical characteristics implies in the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) optimisation, improving the image system resolution. We have studied MTF optimisation of four digital dental X-ray image systems: 1) Digora (Soredex, Helsink, Finland) and Denoptix (Gendex Dental System srl, Milan, Italy) systems, based on PSPL detectors; 2) CDR (Schick Technologies Inc., New York, USA) and Sens-A-Ray 2000 (Regam Medical System, Sudsvall, Sweden), based on CCD detectors.
Processed_MTF_Optimization_in_Digital_Dental_X-ray_Systems.txt	Results The MTF(ν) of the digital image systems are presented in Figure 1(a) . In general, the CCD based systems presented superior resolution than the PSPL based systems. Digora system presented higher resolution than Denoptix system in 300 dpi scanning mode and lower in 600 dpi. In Table 1 we show the resolution based on the LSF Full Width at Half Maximum (FHWM) method. All resolutions are compatible with the data supplied by the manufacturers and always inferior to the Nyquist frequency. Brettle et al. (1996) carried out a study evaluating the MTF(ν) of the Digora system. Our data show good agreement to their results. The same authors refer that cut-off frequency (-3 dB) of Digora system is 2.5 cycles/mm. Figure 1(a) shows that CDR and SAR (CCD based systems) present similar resolution, in spite of SAR smaller aperture. The CCD based systems present superior resolution compared to that of Denoptix system (600 dpi), although presenting larger pixel size. The CDR, Digora and Denoptix (300 dpi) systems have resolutions similar to their Nyquist frequency. This indicates that resolution was heavily limited by scanning aperture. The pixel size is strongly determined by transistors dimensions, in CCD based systems, and by laser reader focal aperture, in the PSPL based systems. However, SAR and Denoptix (600 dpi) present resolution inferior to the Nyquist frequency, indicating the predominance of other limiting processes. Figure 1(b) shows the linearized MTF(ν) for SAR, CDR, Digora and Denoptix (300 dpi) system. Its can be noted that CCD based systems MTF(ν) can be approximated by a Gaussian process (R>0.996) while PSPL based systems present a deviation of this characteristic.
Processed_MTF_Optimization_in_Digital_Dental_X-ray_Systems.txt	Figure 1 – (a) Image systems MTF(ν), obtained by ERF method, and (b) linearized MTF(ν).
Processed_MTF_Optimization_in_Digital_Dental_X-ray_Systems.txt	MTF(ν) can be linearized in parts. The MTF(ν) linear regression of both Digora and Denoptix systems, for frequencies above 3.5 cycles/mm, resulted in the same angular coefficient a=0.219 (R>0.995). This regression identifies a resolution limiting process component named process “A”. Subtracting the process “A” from the original MTF(ν), it is obtained a second limiting process component, named process “B” and illustrated in Figure 2(b). Note that process “B” saturates near 1.7 cycles/mm.
Processed_MTF_Optimization_in_Digital_Dental_X-ray_Systems.txt	Figure 2 – a) Digora and Denoptix (300 dpi) image systems linearized MTF(ν) and b) process “B” MTF(ν) components.
Processed_MTF_Optimization_in_Digital_Dental_X-ray_Systems.txt	Figure 3(a) shows the reconstructed MTF(ν) components due to process “A”. Figure 3(b) shows the linearized MTF(ν) of Denoptix system (600 dpi). Note the saturation near 8 cycles/mm.
Processed_MTF_Optimization_in_Digital_Dental_X-ray_Systems.txt	Figure 3 – a) Reconstructed process “A” MTF(ν) components of Digora and Denoptix (300 dpi) systems and b) linearized MTF(ν) of Denoptix system (600 dpi).
Processed_MTF_Optimization_in_Digital_Dental_X-ray_Systems.txt	focal aperture of the reader; 2) laser scattering inside the phosphor storage plate; 3) stimulated light emission scattering inside the phosphor storage plate; 4) X-ray photon scattering and re-absorption inside the phosphor storage plate; 5) digital and analogical signal processing; and 6) digital sampling interval. Cowen et al. (1993) and Brettle et al. (1996) refer the laser scattering inside the PSPL plate as the main source of resolution degradation. Kashima (1995) states that both Digora and Denoptix systems PSPL plates are produced with the Fuji PSPL HR-III film. Consequently, the process "A", equal in both systems, is probably due to the laser and stimulated light scattering properties of the PSPL film. Thus, process “B” is determined by laser beam focal aperture. Figure 3(a) shows the optimal MTF(ν) of an image system based on this PSPL film. Therefore, it is convenient to design the laser beam focal aperture to match the PSPL film resolution. The manufacturers of Digora and Denoptix (300 dpi) selected the laser focal spot larger than the optimal pixel resolution. Denoptix (600 dpi) presents detection aperture smaller than the optimal pixel resolution, thus increasing unnecessarily the quantum noise. Quantum noise is increased by reducing the quantum fluency over samller detector element. Denoptix (600 dpi) have a MTF(ν) saturation in 8 cycles/mm. Digora and Denoptix systems can be optimized using a 62.5 µm pixel width (selecting the Nyquist frequency to 8 cycles/mm). In general, digital X-ray image systems must have a single Gaussian MTF(ν). Large pixel width will drive to a degradation process in low frequencies whereas small pixel width will drive to MTF(ν) saturation in high frequencies. At the same way, SAR will have better design using a 48 µm pixel width. Moreover, the scanning aperture design must take account the interest clinical diagnosis frequency range. Kashima (1995) uses clinical studies to show that useful dental clinic information is between 2 and 5 cycles/mm. According with the author, a 5 cycles/mm resolution image system would be completely capable of providing an appropriate diagnosis. Albuquerque (2001) shows that Digora system have lower Noise Power Spectrum (NPS(ν)) and higher Detective Quantum Efficiency (DQE(ν)), being the most suitable system to dental practice, instead of have lower resolution.
Processed_MTF_Optimization_in_Digital_Dental_X-ray_Systems.txt	Conclusions The method proposed in this study is convenient to isolate diverse physical process MTF(ν) components and optimize digital X-ray image systems design.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	We have measured the Faraday rotation of 62 extra-galactic background sources in 58 ﬁelds using the CSIRO Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA) with a frequency range of 1.1 - 3.1 GHz with 2048 channels. Our sources cover a region ∼ 12 deg × 12 deg (∼ 1kpc) around the Galactic Centre region. We show that the Galactic Plane for \|𝑙 \| < 10◦ exhibits large Rotation Measures (RMs) with a maximum \|RM\| of 1691.2 ± 4.9 rad m−2 and a mean \|RM\| = 219 ± 42 rad m−2. The RMs decrease in magnitude with increasing projected distance from the Galactic Plane, broadly consistent with previous ﬁndings. We ﬁnd an unusually high fraction (95%) of the sources show Faraday complexity consistent with multiple Faraday components. We attribute the presences of multiple Faraday rotating screens with widely separated Faraday depths to small-scale turbulent RM structure in the Galactic Centre region. The second order structure function of the RM in the Galactic Centre displays a line with a gradient of zero for angular separations spanning 0.83◦ − 11◦ (∼ 120 − 1500 pc), which is expected for scales larger than the outer scale (or driving scale) of magneto-ionic turbulence. We place an upper limit on any break in the SF gradient of 66”, corresponding to an inferred upper limit to the outer scale of turbulence in the inner 1 kpc of the Galactic Centre of 3 pc. We propose stellar feedback as the probable driver of this small-scale turbulence.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Magnetic ﬁelds play a critical role in the dynamics of spiral galaxies, because the energy density of magnetic ﬁelds in the Interstellar Medium (ISM) is comparable to the energy densities of the thermal gas and cosmic rays (Heiles & Haverkorn 2012). ISM magnetic ﬁelds have strengths around a few micro-Gauss and aﬀect star formation (Price & Bate 2008; Birnboim et al. 2015; Krumholz & Federrath 2019) and the spatio-temporal evolution of the ISM (Kobzar et al. 2017).
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Much is still uncertain about the nature of the magnetic ﬁelds that permeate the ISM and in particular those within the centre of our Galaxy. This is because the measurement and the associated interpretation of interstellar magnetic ﬁeld tracers is diﬃcult (Seta & Beck 2019). The magnetic ﬁeld of the Galactic Centre has been studied in a limited capacity, focusing on ﬁlaments and Sagittarius A* (Beck & Wielebinski 2013; Roche et al. 2018).
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	A few studies have used narrow-bandwidth radio polarisation measurements of Faraday rotation to derive the magnetic ﬁeld strength within 1 kpc (projected distance) of the Galactic Centre, ﬁnding large and highly variable amounts of Faraday rotation, but these studies have been limited in their frequency range, accuracy, and resolution (Reich 2003; Roy et al. 2005, 2008; Taylor et al. 2009). Narrow frequency ranges can result in ambiguities in the measurements Faraday rotation which can be resolved by observing over a broad range of frequencies (Farnsworth et al. 2011; O’Sullivan et al. 2012; Anderson et al. 2016). The observation of linearly polarised synchrotron radiation using broadband radio interferometry is one powerful tool for measuring interstellar magnetic ﬁelds. Typically this synchrotron radiation comes from background Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) or foreground objects like Supernovae remnants. In this paper, we aim to use broadband polarimetry from AGN to study turbulence and magnetic ﬁelds in the Galactic Centre.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Faraday rotation occurs due to thermal electrons and magnetic ﬁelds in an ionised plasma and is observed primarily at radio frequencies. The rotation is a function of the initial polarisation angle, 𝜒0, and the wavelength of the observed radiation, 𝜆obs, 𝜒(𝜆2 . Here, RM is the rotation measure of the region.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Here, B is the magnetic ﬁeld strength in micro-Gauss, r and dr are the displacement and incremental displacement along the line-of-sight measured in pc from the source (there) to the observer (here), and C is a conversion constant, 𝐶 = 0.812 rad m−2 pc−1 cm3 𝜇G−1.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	We can interpret a Faraday screen as a region of free electrons and magnetic ﬁelds in the ISM. This region is assumed to not be turbulent or emit polarised synchrotron radiation internally. More complicated Faraday and depolarisation eﬀects can also occur along the line-of-sight, such as external and internal Faraday dispersion (Gardner & Whiteoak 1966). These can be caused by turbulent magneto-ionic environments (Sokoloﬀ et al. 1998), and as such the picture becomes more complicated and requires a more sophisticated framework to analyse, which we describe in Section 1.1. In reality, regions can have synchrotron-emission or turbulent magneto-ionic environments; in the case of synchrotron-emission this most likely occurs in the AGN source or a foreground object (Anderson et al. 2015).
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Where X is the position in space along the line-of-sight, as 𝜙 is a function of the position along the line-of-sight. The Faraday depth function, F(𝜙) (Burn 1966; Brentjens & de Bruyn 2005), is the complex polarised ﬂux density per unit Faraday depth. In the case where there is no external or internal Faraday dispersion from magnetised regions within the beam, we expect each signiﬁcant peak in the F(𝜙) to correspond to the RM of a Faraday screen.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	the polarisation angle, 𝜒, the polarisation fraction p, and the total intensity I as, P = Q + 𝑖U = 𝑝𝐼𝑒2𝑖 𝜒.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Magneto-ionic turbulence is due to the ﬂuid (or hydrodynamic) turbulence within a magnetised plasma. The second order structure function (SF) has been used to analytically determine important scales in ﬂuids (Kolmogorov 1941) and Magneto-Hydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence (Goldreich & Sridhar 1995). A RM structure function can be used to ﬁnd the scales over which the product of the magnetic ﬁeld (B) and electron density (𝑛𝑒) varies. The general SF is deﬁned as, SF 𝑓 (𝛿𝜃) = (cid:104)[ 𝑓 (𝜃) − 𝑓 (𝜃 + 𝛿𝜃)]2(cid:105)𝜃 .
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	In this notation, 𝜃 is the angular separation, f is the varying quantity, and (cid:104)...(cid:105)𝜃 indicates the average over 𝜃. The SFRM (𝛿𝜃) is twice the variance in RM on a scale of 𝛿𝜃. The 𝛿𝜃 at which the structure function changes slope tells us about an important scale of ﬂuctuations. For example, a break in the slope of the RM structure function can be related to the outer scale of turbulence and the slope around this scale indicates how turbulence changes with angular scales. The outer scale is synonymous with the driving scale of turbulence.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Goldreich & Sridhar 1995), we expect a power law SF where smaller scales contribute less to the turbulent energy within a region than larger scales. The physical mechanism causing this is a turbulent cascade, in which energy at larger-scales (maintained due to driving) is transferred to smaller-scales (dissipated due to viscosity).
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	As an example of using the RM structure function to determine the outer scale of ﬂuid turbulence, Haverkorn et al. (2006a) found a zero gradient with an outer scale on the order of ∼ 10 pc for the inner Galactic Plane, indicating that the main source of turbulence had to be injected on a scale of ∼ 10 pc, which they attributed to Hii regions.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	the calculated peak Faraday depths In this paper, we present of 62 sources close to the Galactic Centre, along with a measure of dispersion between multiple peaks in the F(𝜙) of each source. With these data we construct a RM structure function. The details of the observational data are described in Section 2. The data are presented in Section 3 in Table 1 along with discussion of trends in the spatial distributions of Faraday depth and comparisons to previous studies of the Galactic Centre. Section 3 also contains analysis of the calculated RM structure function. Section 4 contains a discussion of the Faraday complexity of our sources, and the possible location along the line-of-sight where the Faraday rotation occurs. Section 5 contains a discussion of the possible causes for the inferred small scale magneto-ionic turbulence observed within the physical distance structure function. Our conclusions are given in Section 6.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	The observations for this study were obtained through two separate projects on the Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA). The ﬁrst set of data1 were observed for a project to study atomic hydrogen absorption through a hydrogen cloud in the foreground of the Galactic Centre (Dénes et al. 2018). The observations targeted bright compact continuum sources over the region \|𝑙 \| (cid:47) 10◦, \|𝑏\| (cid:47) 10◦ of the Galactic Centre. The target sources were selected from the NVSS catalogue (Condon et al. 1998) and had integrated 1.4 GHz ﬂuxes ≥ 200 mJy and were unresolved in NVSS (diameter ≤ 45”). A total of 47 sources were observed with the ATCA in the 1.5C antenna conﬁguration. In the 1.5C conﬁguration, ﬁve of the six 22 m antennas are distributed along a east-west track with a maximum baseline of 1.5km and one antenna (CA06) is ﬁxed at a distance of 3 km from one end of the track. Antenna CA06, providing baselines up to 6km, was available for these observation and used for our imaging.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Every ﬁeld was observed for a total of ∼ 100 minutes between May and June 2015. Observing runs went for 12 hours, the ATCA primary ﬂux and bandpass calibrator, PKS 1934-638, was observed for 30 minutes at the start and end of the 12-hr observing session. Fields were observed hourly, which gave suﬃcient uv coverage for imaging. Data were obtained for both continuum and atomic hydrogen spectral line using the 1M-0.5k correlator conﬁguration on the Compact Array Broadband Backend (Wilson et al. 2011). Only the continuum data covering all four linear polarisation products, XX, YY, XY and YX, were used here. The continuum data cover the frequency range 1.1 - 3.1 GHz with 2048 channels.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Figure 1. Example Stokes I image of ﬁeld 1817-2825 (Named based on centre of ﬁeld) reduced using Miriad software package. The image has; a RMS of 0.001 Jy/beam, 𝐵maj = 18.6" and 𝐵min = 7.3". The colour map is ‘cubehelix’ (Green 2011).
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Data reduction was carried out with the Miriad software package (Sault et al. 1995). We used PKS 1934-638 for bandpass, amplitude and leakage calibration assuming that PKS 1934-638 is un-polarised (Rayner et al. 2000). The brightest continuum source observed each day was used for phase calibration J172836-271236, (NVSS J172920-234535, J174713-192135, J175233-223012, J175151-252359, visibility robust J174716-191954). The J175114-323538, weighting (Briggs 1995) was set to +1.5 with a mean pixel size of 2”, an ideal synthesised beam size of ∼ 6” by ∼ 13”, and a ﬁeld size of 1000 × 1000 pixels.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	A second set of observations was conducted in January 2019 speciﬁcally for this study to extend the sky coverage of the previous data. Eleven additional targets were selected from the NVSS catalogue (Taylor et al. 2009) to ﬁll in regions with limited coverage at \|𝑙 \| (cid:47) 10◦, \|𝑏\| (cid:47) 10◦ from the original survey. The telescope conﬁguration and observation strategy were the same as the previous run of observations. The 6 km baseline available using ATCA was also included for these observations. The total observation run went for 12 hours, each source was observed for a minimum of 1 minute per hour, with a total minimum and maximum integration time of 11 minutes and 176 minutes, respectively. There was 30 minutes of calibration, observing the bandpass calibrator, PKS 1934-638, and 30 minutes of overhead time. The phase and polarisation calibrator used was PKS 1827-360, which has a ﬂux density of 3.986 ± 0.096 Jy at 2100 MHz. The phase calibrator was observed every hour for 2 minutes.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Again, data reduction was performed in the software package Miriad (Sault et al. 1995). The robust visibility weighting was set to +0.8 with a pixel size of 1”, this robust visibility weighting and pixel size were chosen instead of +1.5 and a pixel size of 2” as these observations had more complete uv coverage than the observations taken in 2015. The ﬁeld size was of 1000×1000 pixels. Data ﬂagging was completed by hand in Miriad using the sum-threshold method. After ﬂagging, these data were calibrated and image cubes with 15 MHz channels were created of Stokes parameters I, Q, U, and V, using invert and clean algorithms with typical rms noise levels of 150 𝜇Jy/beam. An example Stokes I image of ﬁeld 1817-2825 is shown in Figure 1.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	For each ﬁeld, multiple sources were identiﬁed using the Aegean v2.1.0 source ﬁnding algorithms (Hancock et al. 2012, 2018) on each total Stokes I intensity Multi Frequency Synthesis (MFS) image. Data extraction was done by collecting the Stokes I, Q, and U values from spectral cubes at a source position as deﬁned by the generated Aegean catalogue. The RMS of the Stokes I, Q, and U cubes, was found by taking 100 × 100 pixel boxes corresponding to 2’ × 2’ away from each source position.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	If a source had a Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) in Stokes P lower than 3 averaged over all channels, or there were less than 50% of the original channels of the source after ﬂagging, the data remaining was not used in our analysis and the source was discarded. Channels that contained signiﬁcant Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) were ignored when collecting the Stokes I, Q, and U data along with the relevant frequencies. The RFI frequencies ﬂagged were broadly consistent for each source and the majority of channels ﬂagged through data reduction were between 1.5 and 1.7 GHz. Major diﬀerences in frequency coverage between sources, due to ﬂagging, were due to the location of sources within the ﬁeld. Sources away from the centre of the ﬁeld had higher noise and had a larger number of ﬂagged frequencies.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	To test if sources were resolved, we checked the Stokes I proﬁle of each source in R.A. and Decl. against the beam dimensions. If the FWHM of a source in Stokes I was any greater than the beam in either direction with a tolerance of 1” - 2”2, that source was designated as resolved. For these sources we re-imaged data cubes using a common beam resolution set to the largest beam associated with the lowest frequency of a cube. Resolved sources are marked with a † in Table 1.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	The Faraday dispersion function, F(𝜙), and RMSF for each source were computed using the rm synthesis and rm clean (Heald 2017) algorithms from the Canadian Initiative for Radio Astronomy Data Analysis (CIRADA) tool-set RMtools 1D v1.0.1 (Purcell et al. 2020). The pipelines ﬁnd a second order polynomial model for the input Stokes I and subsequently use that to ﬁnd Stokes Q/I and U/I, using inverse variance weighting. The RMSF for each source was determined using the associated 𝜆2 coverage, this resulted in each source having a diﬀerent RMSF. rm clean used a cleaning cutoﬀ set to three times the noise in Stokes Q/I and U/I. The obtained peak Faraday depths and errors are given in Table 1. The RM-synthesis capabilities for this study are shown in Table 2.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	The majority of our sources (89%) appear spatially unresolved on the scale of the synthesised beam, which on average was ≈ 26 by 9”. But of these 55 unresolved sources, the majority (77%) show some sub-structure at our maximum baseline of 6km. In addition, for many sources, the F(𝜙) had two or more strong peaks above a SNR of 7 separated in Faraday depth space. An example is shown in Figure 2.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	are most likely to originate in: 1) the AGN themselves or 2) the intervening medium. The other cause of this complexity within a F(𝜙) spectrum may be artefacts from the deconvolution process. Faraday depths that are oﬀset from the RMSF peak by exactly the width of the ﬁrst side-lobe would be indicative of incomplete deconvolution. In Figure 3 we show the distribution of Faraday depth peaks above the noise threshold normalised with respect to the ﬁrst RMSF peak (the ﬁrst side-lobe). As the majority of peak oﬀsets do not correspond to the position of the ﬁrst RMSF side-lobe we assert the peaks are not artefacts.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	The scaling of the separation in Faraday depth from the mean for each source by F(𝜙) amplitude ensures high signal-to-noise peaks are weighted more heavily than lower signal-to-noise peaks. The example spectrum shown in Figure 2 has a large 𝑀2 = 476.8 ± 6.6 rad m−2. The error in 𝑀2 is calculated as the uncertainty in each F(𝜙) spectrum and the standard error in the ﬁrst moment of F(𝜙).
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Non-zero 𝑀2 can derive from: internal Faraday dispersion, 𝛿RM; external Faraday dispersion 𝜎RM, and/or multiple independent Faraday depths, each probing multiple lines-of-sight within the telescope beam, (cid:104)\| RM1 − RM2\|(cid:105), (Ma et al. 2019a). The latter can be observed where the observed AGN is extended, but only on angular scales smaller than the beam. The calculated values of 𝑀2 and the associated errors are found in Table 1; all associated F(𝜙) spectra and Stokes information are shown in the supplementary material provided online.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Figure 2. Example of NVSS J173659-281003 that has two highly separated peaks, giving it a large 𝑀2. In order from left to right, top to bottom; Panel 1: The dirty F(𝜙) is shown in orange, the clean F(𝜙) is shown in blue, the RMSF is shown in green, the peak cutoﬀ line (of seven times the noise) is shown in red, and the black crosses indicate peaks within the spectrum, the black dotted line indicates RMs found through QU Fitting. Panel 2: Stokes I against frequency. Panel 3: Stokes q (blue), u (red), and p (black) against 𝜆2 along with model stokes (blue), u (red), and p (green) from QU ﬁtting. Panel 4: Stokes q against u, coloured based on 𝜆2 along with model stokes q against u (black) from QU ﬁtting. Panel 5: Polarisation angle, 𝜒, against 𝜆2 along with model 𝜒 (green) from QU ﬁtting.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Figure 3. Distribution of Faraday depth peaks above the noise threshold normalised by the diﬀerence in rad m−2 between the main peak of the RMSF and the peak of its ﬁrst sidelobe. Peak oﬀsets that are equal to one could be confused with artefacts from the RMSF.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Figure 4. Plot of the absolute value of RM against 𝑀2. Binned data is in orange and non-binned data is in blue.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	NVSS J175218-210508 had the smallest magnitude peak Faraday depth of −3.2 ± 4.6 rad m−2. For this region, 46% of the observed sources had positive RMs.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	For any source with a 𝑀2 that is consistent with zero within one standard deviation of its uncertainties, we have assigned 𝑀2 = 0 rad m−2. Including sources for which 𝑀2 = 0, the mean and median 𝑀2 were 147 ± 20 rad m−2 and 103 ± 25 rad m−2, respectively. Anderson et al. (2015) within their sample found a mean and median 𝑀2 of 5.9 ± 1.7 rad m−2 and 0.03 ± 0.05 rad m−2, respectively. Note that Anderson et al. (2015) used a high frequency cutoﬀ of ∼ 2GHz. The study also found that only 12% of their sample were ‘complex’ or with a non-zero 𝑀2 with a resolution of ∼ 1’. We also calculated the 𝑀2 for all sources found by O’Sullivan et al. (2017) and found that 55% of their sources had non-zero 𝑀2. We found a mean and median 𝑀2 of 5.9 ± 1.6 rad m−2 and 0.8 ± 2 rad m−2, respectively and a standard deviation of 16.2 rad m−2. Over the 62 sources, 95% had a non-zero 𝑀2, indicating a high fraction of complex sources in our data compared to previous studies (Anderson et al. 2015; O’Sullivan et al. 2017). Our mean 𝑀2 is 25 times larger than that of the published mean 𝑀2 of both Anderson et al. (2015); O’Sullivan et al. (2017).
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Figure 5. Comparison between our peak Faraday depths and the RMs of Roy et al. (2005) and Taylor et al. (2009).
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	We compared our RMs to published values to check for consistency. Roy et al. (2005) and Taylor et al. (2009) both calculated the rotation measures of sources close to the Galactic Centre. We have 17 sources also in Taylor et al. (2009) which were observed using two frequencies, 1364.9 MHz and 1435.1 MHz, each with a width of 42 MHz, and had a beam radius of 45 arcsec. We have 5 sources also observed by Roy et al. (2005) observed with 16 discrete frequency bands of 128-MHz from 4.80 to 8.68 GHz and a resolution of ≈ 6” × 2”. Our mean beam major and minor axes were ≈ 26 and 9”, respectively. Both Roy et al. (2005) and Taylor et al. (2009) treated all sources as simple rotators with a single RM component; extended sources were split into diﬀerent sub-sources each with a separate RM measurement. The RMs of the common sources are given in Table 1 and a comparison plot is shown in Figure 5.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	The two sources that showed the largest disagreements with the Taylor et al. (2009) catalogue were NVSS J180316-274810-A and NVSS J182057-252813. Our RM for NVSS J180316-274810-A of −223.5 rad m−2 is within the n𝜋-ambiguity of 652 rad m−2 discussed by Ma et al. (2019a,b) for the Taylor et al. (2009) RM catalogue, which could lead to the diﬀerence between our RM measurement and that of 438.3 rad m−2 from Taylor et al. (2009). For the source NVSS J182057-252813, it is likely that there is a confusion between two close objects given that the resolution of Taylor et al. (2009) is larger than the size of our study, which would account for the discrepancies between our observed RM of -26.9 rad m−2 and Taylor et al. (2009) observed RM of -273.2 rad m−2. Within our analysis of these sources, we expect our observed peak Faraday depths to be closer to the true peak Faraday depth for each source than those of Roy et al. (2005) and Taylor et al. (2009) due to our larger frequency coverage of each source. Faraday depth measurements do not assume a single thin Faraday screen model for each source as is assumed in RM measurements and therefore can extract more information about each source.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Table 1. Results for sources found; with the closest NVSS name, location in ra, dec, Galactic longitude and latitude, Aegean modelled major (𝑎) and minor (𝑏) axes, and average beam major (𝑎b) and minor (𝑏b) axes, (columns 1 - 9). The table includes the mean polarised intensity percentage (column 10), Peak 𝜙, the RM measurement, of a source (columns 11 - 12), the RM measurement from Taylor et al. (2009) and Roy et al. (2005) catalogues (columns 13 - 16), and 𝑀2 (columns 17 - 18) in rad m−2. Sources with asterisks are the mean of the same source observed on diﬀerent dates. Sources with † are resolved or partially resolved sources.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	of high continuum intensity at Galactic latitudes and longitudes of l = 0◦, b = 0◦ and l = 6◦, b = 0◦.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Table 2. Table of observational and RM-synthesis capabilities based on frequency range and channel size. Column 1 and 2 are the mean frequency range and channel width of our observations, column 3 is the mean MFS noise over all ﬁelds, column 4 is the mean resolution over all ﬁelds in major and minor axes. Column 5 is the mean FWHM of RMSF over all sources, column 6 is the mean maximum measurable scale over all sources, and column 7 is the maximum measurable Faraday depth over all sources (Brentjens & de Bruyn 2005; Dickey et al. 2019).
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	In Figure 7 we show our 𝑀2 measurements plotted over S-PASS (Carretti et al. 2019) with the area of markers scaled on the squared value of 𝑀2. There is a weak trend of larger 𝑀2 towards the Galactic Plane. We test for Stokes I leakage from Galactic Centre continuum emission into the polarised emission of each source. We compared the Stokes I at 2 GHz to the 𝑀2 for each source shown in Figure 8 and found no correlation between the two. In our ATCA ﬁelds the Stokes I emission is almost exclusively from background AGN. The large-scale emission, like that shown in Figures 6 and 7, is resolved out by the extended baselines of the interferometer, leaving only the compact sources. This means it is unlikely that internal Faraday dispersion plays a large role within our sources. Thus, the connection must be between larger 𝑀2 and proximity to the Galactic Plane.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Figure 6. Plot of S-PASS 2.3 GHz (grayscale) with peak Faraday depth magnitude markers of all sources over-plotted. The area of each marker corresponds to the magnitude of the measured peak Faraday depth. Negative peak Faraday depths are blue downward triangles, positive peak Faraday depths are red upward triangles.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Figure 7. Plot of S-PASS 2.3 GHz (grayscale) with peak 𝑀2 magnitude markers of all sources over-plotted. The area of each marker corresponds to the square magnitude of 𝑀2. Pink crosses indicate sources for which 𝑀2 = 0 rad m−2.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	The RM structure function, SFRM was calculated by ﬁnding the square diﬀerences in peak Faraday depth of a source and all other sources within some angular separation (Eq. 8). This was repeated for each source. The resultant diﬀerences were binned in 11 bins between 0.83° to 11°. Each bin had at least 20 pairs (Stil et al. 2011) and the mean number of pairs per bin was 172.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Figure 8. Plot of Stokes I at 2 GHz against 𝑀2, binned data is in orange and non-binned data is in blue. The dashed grey line shows the median Stokes I, indicating a lack of correlation between 𝑀2 and Stokes I at 2 GHz.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	We used the python module https://pypi.org/project/bootstrapped/ with a conﬁdence level of 66% and 10000 iterations to determine the spread for each bin to account for the treatment of errors in log/log plots. This formed the RM structure function for the angular separation between sources.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	here 𝜎2 is the variation of RM generated in the vicinity of the AGN; int is the contribution from the intergalactic medium; 𝜎2 𝜎2 is the contribution of the Galactic Centre and ISM, which is ultimately of the most interest for this study; and 𝜎2 is the noise contribution of the uncertainty in measuring the RM of our sources.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	twice the intrinsic extra-galactic RM scatter of 36 rad−2 m−4 found by Schnitzeler (2010). To separate the Galactic Centre and ISM contribution on 𝜎2 , we subtract twice the intrinsic Milky Way ISM scatter of RM found by Schnitzeler (2010) of 64 rad−2 m−4. To subtract this contribution we use a stochastic approach choosing a Milky Way contribution with ﬂuctuations between 0 to 7 𝜎MW. Anderson et al. (2015) study was centred on a region away from the Galactic Plane4 with 563 polarised sources. Their sources had a mean and median magnitude RM of 13 ± 3 rad m−2 and 12 ± 3 rad m−2, respectively, with a standard deviation of 33 rad m−2. We subtract twice the square of standard deviation in RM calculated by Anderson et al. (2015) of 33 rad m−2, to account for the intrinsic scatter of background AGN, 𝜎2 , as they studied a region of the int sky away from the Galactic Plane. We follow the same approach as Haverkorn et al. (2004) when determining and accounting for 𝜎2 . noise This approach separates the RM structure function from a ‘noise’ structure function which is calculated as a Gaussian with width of √︁noise2. The resultant structure function is shown in Figure 9.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Figure 9. Plot of RM structure function as a function of angular separation, 𝜃. The dashed blue line represents the model calculated using our data with a log likelihood minimisation method. The size of the horizontal error bars represent the size in 𝜃 of each bin. The dashed red, grey, brown, and pink lines are the SF models of previous studies of the Galaxy (Haverkorn et al. 2008; Mao et al. 2010; Anderson et al. 2015). The vertical errors were calculated as described in the main text.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	method which included the error bounds to determine the ﬁt. A zero gradient indicates that the outer scale of turbulence has not been reached for angular scales between 0.83° - 11° and must be smaller than 0.83°. The outer scale is the angular separation at which the structure function ‘breaks’ or changes slope (see Section 1.2). Typically, the turbulence contribution from smaller scales than the outer scale follows a positive power-law slope, as turbulence on smaller scales decay faster than that at large scales. When comparing our structure function to the structure functions of Haverkorn et al. (2008), Mao et al. (2010), and Anderson et al. (2015), as in Figure 9, we see that for the probed ranges of those studies the structure function slopes are all steeper than our observed zero gradient. We also note that the structure function amplitude of Mao et al. (2010); Anderson et al. (2015) is signiﬁcantly smaller than the structure function in Figure 9.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	There are several strong indicators of enhanced ﬂuctuations on small angular-scales of the Faraday rotating medium in the direction of the Galactic Centre. First, 95% of our sources have non-zero 𝑀2 measurements, suggesting measurable spatially imposed RM diﬀerences on the scale of the telescope beam, which is signiﬁcant when compared to other studies of 𝑀2 (e.g. Anderson et al. 2015). Second, the amplitude of the structure function in Figure 9 is higher than found in other parts of the Galaxy (e.g. Mao et al. 2010; Anderson et al. 2015).
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	To understand the large non-zero 𝑀2 measurements, we need to understand what causes them and where along the line-of-sight they originate. We use QU ﬁtting to test if the large 𝑀2 are due to multiple Faraday screens or large 𝜎RM. QU ﬁtting can recover properties of multiple emission components and the quantities are physically motivated, unlike traditional RM-synthesis (Sun et al. 2015).
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Where 𝜓0, 𝑗 is the initial polarisation angle of a screen, j. Two screens were modelled by the addition of two separate P 𝑗 components. The parameters for the best ﬁt model for each source is found in Table 3.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	We used RMtools 1D v1.0.1 to model each source and used reduced 𝜒2 to determine the best model. For sources in which the reduced 𝜒2 for 1 and 2 screens models were within 10% of each other, we elected to model the source with a single screen to avoid over-modelling. The most common model was the two screen model making up 95% of our sources. This is a higher proportion than the number of sources modelled with two screen in O’Sullivan et al. (2017) of 52%. The prevalence of sources with two screens is interesting and could related to the underlying structure of background radio sources; sources that have two prominent lobes might typically probe two Faraday screens which could possibly explain why in the set from O’Sullivan et al. (2017) 52% of sources were best modelled using two Faraday screens.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	The mean and median diﬀerence between RM components, (cid:104)\| RM1 − RM2\|(cid:105), for our set was 218 ± 39 rad m−2 and 137 ± 49 rad m−2. The mean and median external Faraday dispersion, 𝜎RM for our set was 29 ± 3 rad m−2 and 28 ± 4 rad m−2. The mean and median diﬀerence between all Faraday screens, (cid:104)\| RM𝑖 − RM 𝑗 \|(cid:105), (here i and j are all individual screens) for O’Sullivan et al. (2017) was 52 ± 7 rad m−2 and 19 ± 9 rad m−2. The mean and median 𝜎RM for O’Sullivan et al. (2017) was 13 ± 2 rad m−2 and 9.9 ± 2 rad m−2. Our mean 𝜎RM and (cid:104)\| RM1 − RM2\|(cid:105) are 2 and 4 times larger than that of the means of O’Sullivan et al. (2017), respectively. We surmise that we are probing a signiﬁcantly diﬀerent environment than that of O’Sullivan et al. (2017) as we expect the background AGN to be of a similar population. From this we infer that the enhanced 𝑀2 is likely primarily caused by enhanced (cid:104)\| RM1 − RM2\|(cid:105) and modulated slightly by enhanced 𝜎RM. This would explain why we don’t see a complete agreement between (cid:104)\| RM1 − RM2\|(cid:105) and 𝑀2. The question still remains where this complex magneto-ionic environment occurs along the line-of-sight. In the following subsection, we demonstrate that the ﬂuctuations can reasonably be attributed to the magneto-ionic environment of the Galactic Centre.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	Table 3. Results for QU ﬁtting; with the closest NVSS name (column 1). The predicted polarisation fraction for screen 1 and 2 (columns 2 - 5). The RM for screen 1 and 2 (columns 4 - 9). The external Faraday dispersion, 𝜎RM,i for screen 1 and 2 (columns 10 - 13). Sources with asterisks are the mean of the same source observed on diﬀerent dates.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	is therefore reasonable to assume that the magnitude of the RMs we observe originates near or in the Galactic Centre environment.
Processed_Heightened_Faraday_Complexity_in_the_inner_1_kpc_o.txt	double and the mean diﬀerence between the RMs of Faraday screens ((cid:104)\| RM1 − RM2\|(cid:105)) was 4 times larger than that of O’Sullivan et al. (2017). The scale of the RM variations within a resolution element for our measurements, as characterised by (cid:104)\| RM1 − RM2\|(cid:105), is large when compared to that expected from the RM variations for other regions in the Galaxy (away from the Galactic Centre on the Plane and away from the Galactic Plane) indicating that the variation likely originates in the Galactic Centre.

Subsets and Splits

No saved queries yet

Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.