id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA4300 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
credit facilities . as such , our foreign cash and cash equivalents are not expected to be a key source of liquidity to our domestic operations . at september 30 , 2019 , we had approximately $ 2.9 billion of availability under our committed credit facilities , primarily under our revolving credit facility , the majority of which matures on july 1 , 2022 . this liquidity may be used to provide for ongoing working capital needs and for other general corporate purposes , including acquisitions , dividends and stock repurchases . certain restrictive covenants govern our maximum availability under the credit facilities . we test and report our compliance with these covenants as required and we were in compliance with all of these covenants at september 30 , 2019 . at september 30 , 2019 , we had $ 129.8 million of outstanding letters of credit not drawn cash and cash equivalents were $ 151.6 million at september 30 , 2019 and $ 636.8 million at september 30 , 2018 . we used a significant portion of the cash and cash equivalents on hand at september 30 , 2018 in connection with the closing of the kapstone acquisition . primarily all of the cash and cash equivalents at september 30 , 2019 were held outside of the u.s . at september 30 , 2019 , total debt was $ 10063.4 million , $ 561.1 million of which was current . at september 30 , 2018 , total debt was $ 6415.2 million , $ 740.7 million of which was current . the increase in debt was primarily related to the kapstone acquisition . cash flow activity . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2019</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2310.2</td><td>$ 1931.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>$ -4579.6 ( 4579.6 )</td><td>$ -815.1 ( 815.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>$ 1780.2</td><td>$ -755.1 ( 755.1 )</td></tr></table> net cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 2019 increased $ 379.0 million from fiscal 2018 primarily due to higher cash earnings and a $ 340.3 million net decrease in the use of working capital compared to the prior year . as a result of the retrospective adoption of asu 2016-15 and asu 2016-18 ( each as hereinafter defined ) as discussed in 201cnote 1 . description of business and summary of significant accounting policies 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements , net cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2018 was reduced by $ 489.7 million and cash provided by investing activities increased $ 483.8 million , primarily for the change in classification of proceeds received for beneficial interests obtained for transferring trade receivables in securitization transactions . net cash used for investing activities of $ 4579.6 million in fiscal 2019 consisted primarily of $ 3374.2 million for cash paid for the purchase of businesses , net of cash acquired ( excluding the assumption of debt ) , primarily related to the kapstone acquisition , and $ 1369.1 million for capital expenditures that were partially offset by $ 119.1 million of proceeds from the sale of property , plant and equipment primarily related to the sale of our atlanta beverage facility , $ 33.2 million of proceeds from corporate owned life insurance benefits and $ 25.5 million of proceeds from property , plant and equipment insurance proceeds related to the panama city , fl mill . net cash used for investing activities of $ 815.1 million in fiscal 2018 consisted primarily of $ 999.9 million for capital expenditures , $ 239.9 million for cash paid for the purchase of businesses , net of cash acquired primarily related to the plymouth acquisition and the schl fcter acquisition , and $ 108.0 million for an investment in grupo gondi . these investments were partially offset by $ 461.6 million of cash receipts on sold trade receivables as a result of the adoption of asu 2016-15 , $ 24.0 million of proceeds from the sale of certain affiliates as well as our solid waste management brokerage services business and $ 23.3 million of proceeds from the sale of property , plant and equipment . in fiscal 2019 , net cash provided by financing activities of $ 1780.2 million consisted primarily of a net increase in debt of $ 2314.6 million , primarily related to the kapstone acquisition and partially offset by cash dividends paid to stockholders of $ 467.9 million and purchases of common stock of $ 88.6 million . in fiscal 2018 , net cash used for financing activities of $ 755.1 million consisted primarily of cash dividends paid to stockholders of $ 440.9 million and purchases of common stock of $ 195.1 million and net repayments of debt of $ 120.1 million. .
Question: what is the net cash flow from operating and investing activities in 2019?
Answer: -2269.4
Question: what about the net cash flow from financing activities?
Answer: 1780.2
Question: what is the net cash flow in 2019?
Answer: -489.2
Question: what portion of net cash flow from financing activities was used to purchase back common stock shares in 2018?
| 0.25838 |
CONVFINQA4301 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
56 / 57 management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations junior subordinate deferrable interest debentures in june 2005 , we issued $ 100.0 a0million of trust preferred securities , which are reflected on the balance sheet as junior subordinate deferrable interest debentures . the proceeds were used to repay our revolving credit facility . the $ 100.0 a0million of junior subordi- nate deferrable interest debentures have a 30-year term ending july 2035 . they bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.61% ( 5.61 % ) for the first 10 years ending july 2015 . thereafter , the rate will float at three month libor plus 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) . the securities are redeemable at par . restrictive covenants the terms of the 2011 revolving credit facility and certain of our senior unsecured notes include certain restrictions and covenants which may limit , among other things , our ability to pay dividends ( as discussed below ) , make certain types of investments , incur additional indebtedness , incur liens and enter into negative pledge agreements and the disposition of assets , and which require compliance with financial ratios including our minimum tangible net worth , a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value , a minimum ratio of ebitda to fixed charges and a maximum ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value . the dividend restriction referred to above provides that we will not during any time when we are in default , make distributions with respect to common stock or other equity interests , except to enable us to continue to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes . as of december a031 , 2011 and 2010 , we were in compli- ance with all such covenants . market rate risk we are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily from our floating rate borrowing arrangements . we use interest rate deriv- ative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes . a a0hypothetical 100 a0basis point increase in interest rates along the entire interest rate curve for 2011 and 2010 , would increase our annual interest cost by approximately $ 12.3 a0million and $ 11.0 a0mil- lion and would increase our share of joint venture annual interest cost by approximately $ 4.8 a0million and $ 6.7 a0million , respectively . we recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value . derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income . if a derivative is a hedge , depending on the nature of the hedge , changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset , liability , or firm commitment through earnings , or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings . the ineffective portion of a derivative 2019s change in fair value is recognized immediately in earnings . approximately $ 4.8 a0billion of our long- term debt bore interest a0at fixed rates , and therefore the fair value of these instru- ments is affected by changes in the market interest rates . the interest rate on our variable rate debt and joint venture debt as of december a031 , 2011 ranged from libor plus 150 a0basis points to libor plus 350 a0basis points . contractual obligations combined aggregate principal maturities of mortgages and other loans payable , our 2011 revolving credit facility , senior unsecured notes ( net of discount ) , trust preferred securities , our share of joint venture debt , including as- of-right extension options , estimated interest expense ( based on weighted average interest rates for the quarter ) , and our obligations under our capital lease and ground leases , as of december a031 , 2011 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property mortgages</td><td>$ 52443</td><td>$ 568649</td><td>$ 647776</td><td>$ 270382</td><td>$ 556400</td><td>$ 2278190</td><td>$ 4373840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>revolving credit facility</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>350000</td><td>2014</td><td>350000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trust preferred securities</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>100000</td><td>100000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>senior unsecured notes</td><td>119423</td><td>2014</td><td>98578</td><td>657</td><td>274804</td><td>777194</td><td>1270656</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>capital lease</td><td>1555</td><td>1555</td><td>1555</td><td>1592</td><td>1707</td><td>42351</td><td>50315</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>ground leases</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33533</td><td>615450</td><td>782699</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>estimated interest expense</td><td>312672</td><td>309280</td><td>269286</td><td>244709</td><td>212328</td><td>470359</td><td>1818634</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>joint venture debt</td><td>176457</td><td>93683</td><td>123983</td><td>102476</td><td>527814</td><td>800102</td><td>1824515</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total</td><td>$ 695979</td><td>$ 1006596</td><td>$ 1174607</td><td>$ 653245</td><td>$ 1956586</td><td>$ 5083646</td><td>$ 10570659</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the sum of joint venture debt in 2012 and 2013?
| 270140.0 |
CONVFINQA4302 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
56 / 57 management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations junior subordinate deferrable interest debentures in june 2005 , we issued $ 100.0 a0million of trust preferred securities , which are reflected on the balance sheet as junior subordinate deferrable interest debentures . the proceeds were used to repay our revolving credit facility . the $ 100.0 a0million of junior subordi- nate deferrable interest debentures have a 30-year term ending july 2035 . they bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.61% ( 5.61 % ) for the first 10 years ending july 2015 . thereafter , the rate will float at three month libor plus 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) . the securities are redeemable at par . restrictive covenants the terms of the 2011 revolving credit facility and certain of our senior unsecured notes include certain restrictions and covenants which may limit , among other things , our ability to pay dividends ( as discussed below ) , make certain types of investments , incur additional indebtedness , incur liens and enter into negative pledge agreements and the disposition of assets , and which require compliance with financial ratios including our minimum tangible net worth , a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value , a minimum ratio of ebitda to fixed charges and a maximum ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value . the dividend restriction referred to above provides that we will not during any time when we are in default , make distributions with respect to common stock or other equity interests , except to enable us to continue to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes . as of december a031 , 2011 and 2010 , we were in compli- ance with all such covenants . market rate risk we are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily from our floating rate borrowing arrangements . we use interest rate deriv- ative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes . a a0hypothetical 100 a0basis point increase in interest rates along the entire interest rate curve for 2011 and 2010 , would increase our annual interest cost by approximately $ 12.3 a0million and $ 11.0 a0mil- lion and would increase our share of joint venture annual interest cost by approximately $ 4.8 a0million and $ 6.7 a0million , respectively . we recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value . derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income . if a derivative is a hedge , depending on the nature of the hedge , changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset , liability , or firm commitment through earnings , or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings . the ineffective portion of a derivative 2019s change in fair value is recognized immediately in earnings . approximately $ 4.8 a0billion of our long- term debt bore interest a0at fixed rates , and therefore the fair value of these instru- ments is affected by changes in the market interest rates . the interest rate on our variable rate debt and joint venture debt as of december a031 , 2011 ranged from libor plus 150 a0basis points to libor plus 350 a0basis points . contractual obligations combined aggregate principal maturities of mortgages and other loans payable , our 2011 revolving credit facility , senior unsecured notes ( net of discount ) , trust preferred securities , our share of joint venture debt , including as- of-right extension options , estimated interest expense ( based on weighted average interest rates for the quarter ) , and our obligations under our capital lease and ground leases , as of december a031 , 2011 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property mortgages</td><td>$ 52443</td><td>$ 568649</td><td>$ 647776</td><td>$ 270382</td><td>$ 556400</td><td>$ 2278190</td><td>$ 4373840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>revolving credit facility</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>350000</td><td>2014</td><td>350000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trust preferred securities</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>100000</td><td>100000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>senior unsecured notes</td><td>119423</td><td>2014</td><td>98578</td><td>657</td><td>274804</td><td>777194</td><td>1270656</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>capital lease</td><td>1555</td><td>1555</td><td>1555</td><td>1592</td><td>1707</td><td>42351</td><td>50315</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>ground leases</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33533</td><td>615450</td><td>782699</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>estimated interest expense</td><td>312672</td><td>309280</td><td>269286</td><td>244709</td><td>212328</td><td>470359</td><td>1818634</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>joint venture debt</td><td>176457</td><td>93683</td><td>123983</td><td>102476</td><td>527814</td><td>800102</td><td>1824515</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total</td><td>$ 695979</td><td>$ 1006596</td><td>$ 1174607</td><td>$ 653245</td><td>$ 1956586</td><td>$ 5083646</td><td>$ 10570659</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the sum of joint venture debt in 2012 and 2013?
Answer: 270140.0
Question: what is the value including joint venture debt from 2014?
| 394123.0 |
CONVFINQA4303 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
56 / 57 management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations junior subordinate deferrable interest debentures in june 2005 , we issued $ 100.0 a0million of trust preferred securities , which are reflected on the balance sheet as junior subordinate deferrable interest debentures . the proceeds were used to repay our revolving credit facility . the $ 100.0 a0million of junior subordi- nate deferrable interest debentures have a 30-year term ending july 2035 . they bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.61% ( 5.61 % ) for the first 10 years ending july 2015 . thereafter , the rate will float at three month libor plus 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) . the securities are redeemable at par . restrictive covenants the terms of the 2011 revolving credit facility and certain of our senior unsecured notes include certain restrictions and covenants which may limit , among other things , our ability to pay dividends ( as discussed below ) , make certain types of investments , incur additional indebtedness , incur liens and enter into negative pledge agreements and the disposition of assets , and which require compliance with financial ratios including our minimum tangible net worth , a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value , a minimum ratio of ebitda to fixed charges and a maximum ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value . the dividend restriction referred to above provides that we will not during any time when we are in default , make distributions with respect to common stock or other equity interests , except to enable us to continue to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes . as of december a031 , 2011 and 2010 , we were in compli- ance with all such covenants . market rate risk we are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily from our floating rate borrowing arrangements . we use interest rate deriv- ative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes . a a0hypothetical 100 a0basis point increase in interest rates along the entire interest rate curve for 2011 and 2010 , would increase our annual interest cost by approximately $ 12.3 a0million and $ 11.0 a0mil- lion and would increase our share of joint venture annual interest cost by approximately $ 4.8 a0million and $ 6.7 a0million , respectively . we recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value . derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income . if a derivative is a hedge , depending on the nature of the hedge , changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset , liability , or firm commitment through earnings , or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings . the ineffective portion of a derivative 2019s change in fair value is recognized immediately in earnings . approximately $ 4.8 a0billion of our long- term debt bore interest a0at fixed rates , and therefore the fair value of these instru- ments is affected by changes in the market interest rates . the interest rate on our variable rate debt and joint venture debt as of december a031 , 2011 ranged from libor plus 150 a0basis points to libor plus 350 a0basis points . contractual obligations combined aggregate principal maturities of mortgages and other loans payable , our 2011 revolving credit facility , senior unsecured notes ( net of discount ) , trust preferred securities , our share of joint venture debt , including as- of-right extension options , estimated interest expense ( based on weighted average interest rates for the quarter ) , and our obligations under our capital lease and ground leases , as of december a031 , 2011 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property mortgages</td><td>$ 52443</td><td>$ 568649</td><td>$ 647776</td><td>$ 270382</td><td>$ 556400</td><td>$ 2278190</td><td>$ 4373840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>revolving credit facility</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>350000</td><td>2014</td><td>350000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trust preferred securities</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>100000</td><td>100000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>senior unsecured notes</td><td>119423</td><td>2014</td><td>98578</td><td>657</td><td>274804</td><td>777194</td><td>1270656</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>capital lease</td><td>1555</td><td>1555</td><td>1555</td><td>1592</td><td>1707</td><td>42351</td><td>50315</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>ground leases</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33533</td><td>615450</td><td>782699</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>estimated interest expense</td><td>312672</td><td>309280</td><td>269286</td><td>244709</td><td>212328</td><td>470359</td><td>1818634</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>joint venture debt</td><td>176457</td><td>93683</td><td>123983</td><td>102476</td><td>527814</td><td>800102</td><td>1824515</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total</td><td>$ 695979</td><td>$ 1006596</td><td>$ 1174607</td><td>$ 653245</td><td>$ 1956586</td><td>$ 5083646</td><td>$ 10570659</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the sum of joint venture debt in 2012 and 2013?
Answer: 270140.0
Question: what is the value including joint venture debt from 2014?
Answer: 394123.0
Question: what is the total including 2015?
| 496599.0 |
CONVFINQA4304 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
56 / 57 management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations junior subordinate deferrable interest debentures in june 2005 , we issued $ 100.0 a0million of trust preferred securities , which are reflected on the balance sheet as junior subordinate deferrable interest debentures . the proceeds were used to repay our revolving credit facility . the $ 100.0 a0million of junior subordi- nate deferrable interest debentures have a 30-year term ending july 2035 . they bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.61% ( 5.61 % ) for the first 10 years ending july 2015 . thereafter , the rate will float at three month libor plus 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) . the securities are redeemable at par . restrictive covenants the terms of the 2011 revolving credit facility and certain of our senior unsecured notes include certain restrictions and covenants which may limit , among other things , our ability to pay dividends ( as discussed below ) , make certain types of investments , incur additional indebtedness , incur liens and enter into negative pledge agreements and the disposition of assets , and which require compliance with financial ratios including our minimum tangible net worth , a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value , a minimum ratio of ebitda to fixed charges and a maximum ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value . the dividend restriction referred to above provides that we will not during any time when we are in default , make distributions with respect to common stock or other equity interests , except to enable us to continue to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes . as of december a031 , 2011 and 2010 , we were in compli- ance with all such covenants . market rate risk we are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily from our floating rate borrowing arrangements . we use interest rate deriv- ative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes . a a0hypothetical 100 a0basis point increase in interest rates along the entire interest rate curve for 2011 and 2010 , would increase our annual interest cost by approximately $ 12.3 a0million and $ 11.0 a0mil- lion and would increase our share of joint venture annual interest cost by approximately $ 4.8 a0million and $ 6.7 a0million , respectively . we recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value . derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income . if a derivative is a hedge , depending on the nature of the hedge , changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset , liability , or firm commitment through earnings , or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings . the ineffective portion of a derivative 2019s change in fair value is recognized immediately in earnings . approximately $ 4.8 a0billion of our long- term debt bore interest a0at fixed rates , and therefore the fair value of these instru- ments is affected by changes in the market interest rates . the interest rate on our variable rate debt and joint venture debt as of december a031 , 2011 ranged from libor plus 150 a0basis points to libor plus 350 a0basis points . contractual obligations combined aggregate principal maturities of mortgages and other loans payable , our 2011 revolving credit facility , senior unsecured notes ( net of discount ) , trust preferred securities , our share of joint venture debt , including as- of-right extension options , estimated interest expense ( based on weighted average interest rates for the quarter ) , and our obligations under our capital lease and ground leases , as of december a031 , 2011 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property mortgages</td><td>$ 52443</td><td>$ 568649</td><td>$ 647776</td><td>$ 270382</td><td>$ 556400</td><td>$ 2278190</td><td>$ 4373840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>revolving credit facility</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>350000</td><td>2014</td><td>350000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trust preferred securities</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>100000</td><td>100000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>senior unsecured notes</td><td>119423</td><td>2014</td><td>98578</td><td>657</td><td>274804</td><td>777194</td><td>1270656</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>capital lease</td><td>1555</td><td>1555</td><td>1555</td><td>1592</td><td>1707</td><td>42351</td><td>50315</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>ground leases</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33533</td><td>615450</td><td>782699</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>estimated interest expense</td><td>312672</td><td>309280</td><td>269286</td><td>244709</td><td>212328</td><td>470359</td><td>1818634</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>joint venture debt</td><td>176457</td><td>93683</td><td>123983</td><td>102476</td><td>527814</td><td>800102</td><td>1824515</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total</td><td>$ 695979</td><td>$ 1006596</td><td>$ 1174607</td><td>$ 653245</td><td>$ 1956586</td><td>$ 5083646</td><td>$ 10570659</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the sum of joint venture debt in 2012 and 2013?
Answer: 270140.0
Question: what is the value including joint venture debt from 2014?
Answer: 394123.0
Question: what is the total including 2015?
Answer: 496599.0
Question: what is the total including 2016?
| 1024413.0 |
CONVFINQA4305 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
56 / 57 management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations junior subordinate deferrable interest debentures in june 2005 , we issued $ 100.0 a0million of trust preferred securities , which are reflected on the balance sheet as junior subordinate deferrable interest debentures . the proceeds were used to repay our revolving credit facility . the $ 100.0 a0million of junior subordi- nate deferrable interest debentures have a 30-year term ending july 2035 . they bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.61% ( 5.61 % ) for the first 10 years ending july 2015 . thereafter , the rate will float at three month libor plus 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) . the securities are redeemable at par . restrictive covenants the terms of the 2011 revolving credit facility and certain of our senior unsecured notes include certain restrictions and covenants which may limit , among other things , our ability to pay dividends ( as discussed below ) , make certain types of investments , incur additional indebtedness , incur liens and enter into negative pledge agreements and the disposition of assets , and which require compliance with financial ratios including our minimum tangible net worth , a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value , a minimum ratio of ebitda to fixed charges and a maximum ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value . the dividend restriction referred to above provides that we will not during any time when we are in default , make distributions with respect to common stock or other equity interests , except to enable us to continue to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes . as of december a031 , 2011 and 2010 , we were in compli- ance with all such covenants . market rate risk we are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily from our floating rate borrowing arrangements . we use interest rate deriv- ative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes . a a0hypothetical 100 a0basis point increase in interest rates along the entire interest rate curve for 2011 and 2010 , would increase our annual interest cost by approximately $ 12.3 a0million and $ 11.0 a0mil- lion and would increase our share of joint venture annual interest cost by approximately $ 4.8 a0million and $ 6.7 a0million , respectively . we recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value . derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income . if a derivative is a hedge , depending on the nature of the hedge , changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset , liability , or firm commitment through earnings , or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings . the ineffective portion of a derivative 2019s change in fair value is recognized immediately in earnings . approximately $ 4.8 a0billion of our long- term debt bore interest a0at fixed rates , and therefore the fair value of these instru- ments is affected by changes in the market interest rates . the interest rate on our variable rate debt and joint venture debt as of december a031 , 2011 ranged from libor plus 150 a0basis points to libor plus 350 a0basis points . contractual obligations combined aggregate principal maturities of mortgages and other loans payable , our 2011 revolving credit facility , senior unsecured notes ( net of discount ) , trust preferred securities , our share of joint venture debt , including as- of-right extension options , estimated interest expense ( based on weighted average interest rates for the quarter ) , and our obligations under our capital lease and ground leases , as of december a031 , 2011 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property mortgages</td><td>$ 52443</td><td>$ 568649</td><td>$ 647776</td><td>$ 270382</td><td>$ 556400</td><td>$ 2278190</td><td>$ 4373840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>revolving credit facility</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>350000</td><td>2014</td><td>350000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trust preferred securities</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>100000</td><td>100000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>senior unsecured notes</td><td>119423</td><td>2014</td><td>98578</td><td>657</td><td>274804</td><td>777194</td><td>1270656</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>capital lease</td><td>1555</td><td>1555</td><td>1555</td><td>1592</td><td>1707</td><td>42351</td><td>50315</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>ground leases</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33533</td><td>615450</td><td>782699</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>estimated interest expense</td><td>312672</td><td>309280</td><td>269286</td><td>244709</td><td>212328</td><td>470359</td><td>1818634</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>joint venture debt</td><td>176457</td><td>93683</td><td>123983</td><td>102476</td><td>527814</td><td>800102</td><td>1824515</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total</td><td>$ 695979</td><td>$ 1006596</td><td>$ 1174607</td><td>$ 653245</td><td>$ 1956586</td><td>$ 5083646</td><td>$ 10570659</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the sum of joint venture debt in 2012 and 2013?
Answer: 270140.0
Question: what is the value including joint venture debt from 2014?
Answer: 394123.0
Question: what is the total including 2015?
Answer: 496599.0
Question: what is the total including 2016?
Answer: 1024413.0
Question: what is the total less the value of joint venture debt thereafter?
| 224311.0 |
CONVFINQA4306 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy texas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 442.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-4.6 ( 4.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>-3.3 ( 3.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securitization transition charge</td><td>9.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-10.1 ( 10.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 440.9</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased usage during the unbilled sales period . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization revenue related to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007 . the securitization transition charge variance is primarily due to the issuance of securitization bonds . in june 2007 , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds . the fuel recovery variance is primarily due to a reserve for potential rate refunds made in the first quarter 2007 as a result of a puct ruling related to the application of past puct rulings addressing transition to competition in texas . the other variance is primarily caused by various operational effects of the jurisdictional separation on revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased $ 229.3 million primarily due to the following reasons : an increase of $ 157 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased usage , partially offset by interim fuel refunds to customers for fuel cost recovery over-collections through november 2007 . the refund was distributed over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the interim refund and the puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements ; an increase of $ 37.1 million in affiliated wholesale revenue primarily due to increases in the cost of energy ; an increase in transition charge amounts collected from customers to service the securitization bonds as discussed above . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds ; and implementation of an interim surcharge to collect $ 10.3 million in under-recovered incremental purchased capacity costs incurred through july 2007 . the surcharge was collected over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the incremental capacity recovery rider and puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements. .
Question: what was the net revenue for entergy texas , inc. in 2008?
| 440.9 |
CONVFINQA4307 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy texas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 442.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-4.6 ( 4.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>-3.3 ( 3.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securitization transition charge</td><td>9.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-10.1 ( 10.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 440.9</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased usage during the unbilled sales period . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization revenue related to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007 . the securitization transition charge variance is primarily due to the issuance of securitization bonds . in june 2007 , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds . the fuel recovery variance is primarily due to a reserve for potential rate refunds made in the first quarter 2007 as a result of a puct ruling related to the application of past puct rulings addressing transition to competition in texas . the other variance is primarily caused by various operational effects of the jurisdictional separation on revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased $ 229.3 million primarily due to the following reasons : an increase of $ 157 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased usage , partially offset by interim fuel refunds to customers for fuel cost recovery over-collections through november 2007 . the refund was distributed over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the interim refund and the puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements ; an increase of $ 37.1 million in affiliated wholesale revenue primarily due to increases in the cost of energy ; an increase in transition charge amounts collected from customers to service the securitization bonds as discussed above . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds ; and implementation of an interim surcharge to collect $ 10.3 million in under-recovered incremental purchased capacity costs incurred through july 2007 . the surcharge was collected over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the incremental capacity recovery rider and puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements. .
Question: what was the net revenue for entergy texas , inc. in 2008?
Answer: 440.9
Question: and what was it in 2007?
| 442.3 |
CONVFINQA4308 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy texas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 442.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-4.6 ( 4.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>-3.3 ( 3.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securitization transition charge</td><td>9.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-10.1 ( 10.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 440.9</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased usage during the unbilled sales period . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization revenue related to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007 . the securitization transition charge variance is primarily due to the issuance of securitization bonds . in june 2007 , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds . the fuel recovery variance is primarily due to a reserve for potential rate refunds made in the first quarter 2007 as a result of a puct ruling related to the application of past puct rulings addressing transition to competition in texas . the other variance is primarily caused by various operational effects of the jurisdictional separation on revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased $ 229.3 million primarily due to the following reasons : an increase of $ 157 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased usage , partially offset by interim fuel refunds to customers for fuel cost recovery over-collections through november 2007 . the refund was distributed over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the interim refund and the puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements ; an increase of $ 37.1 million in affiliated wholesale revenue primarily due to increases in the cost of energy ; an increase in transition charge amounts collected from customers to service the securitization bonds as discussed above . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds ; and implementation of an interim surcharge to collect $ 10.3 million in under-recovered incremental purchased capacity costs incurred through july 2007 . the surcharge was collected over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the incremental capacity recovery rider and puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements. .
Question: what was the net revenue for entergy texas , inc. in 2008?
Answer: 440.9
Question: and what was it in 2007?
Answer: 442.3
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| -1.4 |
CONVFINQA4309 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy texas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 442.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-4.6 ( 4.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>-3.3 ( 3.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securitization transition charge</td><td>9.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-10.1 ( 10.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 440.9</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased usage during the unbilled sales period . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization revenue related to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007 . the securitization transition charge variance is primarily due to the issuance of securitization bonds . in june 2007 , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds . the fuel recovery variance is primarily due to a reserve for potential rate refunds made in the first quarter 2007 as a result of a puct ruling related to the application of past puct rulings addressing transition to competition in texas . the other variance is primarily caused by various operational effects of the jurisdictional separation on revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased $ 229.3 million primarily due to the following reasons : an increase of $ 157 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased usage , partially offset by interim fuel refunds to customers for fuel cost recovery over-collections through november 2007 . the refund was distributed over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the interim refund and the puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements ; an increase of $ 37.1 million in affiliated wholesale revenue primarily due to increases in the cost of energy ; an increase in transition charge amounts collected from customers to service the securitization bonds as discussed above . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds ; and implementation of an interim surcharge to collect $ 10.3 million in under-recovered incremental purchased capacity costs incurred through july 2007 . the surcharge was collected over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the incremental capacity recovery rider and puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements. .
Question: what was the net revenue for entergy texas , inc. in 2008?
Answer: 440.9
Question: and what was it in 2007?
Answer: 442.3
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: -1.4
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2007 net revenue?
| -0.00317 |
CONVFINQA4310 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy texas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 442.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-4.6 ( 4.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>-3.3 ( 3.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securitization transition charge</td><td>9.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-10.1 ( 10.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 440.9</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased usage during the unbilled sales period . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization revenue related to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007 . the securitization transition charge variance is primarily due to the issuance of securitization bonds . in june 2007 , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds . the fuel recovery variance is primarily due to a reserve for potential rate refunds made in the first quarter 2007 as a result of a puct ruling related to the application of past puct rulings addressing transition to competition in texas . the other variance is primarily caused by various operational effects of the jurisdictional separation on revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased $ 229.3 million primarily due to the following reasons : an increase of $ 157 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased usage , partially offset by interim fuel refunds to customers for fuel cost recovery over-collections through november 2007 . the refund was distributed over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the interim refund and the puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements ; an increase of $ 37.1 million in affiliated wholesale revenue primarily due to increases in the cost of energy ; an increase in transition charge amounts collected from customers to service the securitization bonds as discussed above . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds ; and implementation of an interim surcharge to collect $ 10.3 million in under-recovered incremental purchased capacity costs incurred through july 2007 . the surcharge was collected over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the incremental capacity recovery rider and puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements. .
Question: what was the net revenue for entergy texas , inc. in 2008?
Answer: 440.9
Question: and what was it in 2007?
Answer: 442.3
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: -1.4
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2007 net revenue?
Answer: -0.00317
Question: how much is that in percentage?
| -0.00317 |
CONVFINQA4311 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
valuation techniques 2013 cash equivalents are mostly comprised of short-term money-market instruments and are valued at cost , which approximates fair value . u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for commingled equity funds not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor . fixed income investments categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g. , interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals and credit spreads ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . fixed income investments are categorized as level 3 when valuations using observable inputs are unavailable . the trustee typically obtains pricing based on indicative quotes or bid evaluations from vendors , brokers or the investment manager . in addition , certain other fixed income investments categorized as level 3 are valued using a discounted cash flow approach . significant inputs include projected annuity payments and the discount rate applied to those payments . certain commingled equity funds , consisting of equity mutual funds , are valued using the nav . the nav valuations are based on the underlying investments and typically redeemable within 90 days . private equity funds consist of partnership and co-investment funds . the nav is based on valuation models of the underlying securities , which includes unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 12 years . real estate funds consist of partnerships , most of which are closed-end funds , for which the nav is based on valuation models and periodic appraisals . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 10 years . hedge funds consist of direct hedge funds for which the nav is generally based on the valuation of the underlying investments . redemptions in hedge funds are based on the specific terms of each fund , and generally range from a minimum of one month to several months . contributions and expected benefit payments the funding of our qualified defined benefit pension plans is determined in accordance with erisa , as amended by the ppa , and in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . we made contributions of $ 5.0 billion to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2018 , including required and discretionary contributions . as a result of these contributions , we do not expect to make contributions to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2019 . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2018 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>2023</td><td>2024 2013 2028</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>qualified defined benefit pension plans</td><td>$ 2350</td><td>$ 2390</td><td>$ 2470</td><td>$ 2550</td><td>$ 2610</td><td>$ 13670</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retiree medical and life insurance plans</td><td>170</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>170</td><td>810</td></tr></table> defined contribution plans we maintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 658 million in 2018 , $ 613 million in 2017 and $ 617 million in 2016 , the majority of which were funded using our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 33.3 million and 35.5 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017. .
Question: what is the difference in 401k contributions from 2017 to 2018?
| 45.0 |
CONVFINQA4312 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
valuation techniques 2013 cash equivalents are mostly comprised of short-term money-market instruments and are valued at cost , which approximates fair value . u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for commingled equity funds not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor . fixed income investments categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g. , interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals and credit spreads ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . fixed income investments are categorized as level 3 when valuations using observable inputs are unavailable . the trustee typically obtains pricing based on indicative quotes or bid evaluations from vendors , brokers or the investment manager . in addition , certain other fixed income investments categorized as level 3 are valued using a discounted cash flow approach . significant inputs include projected annuity payments and the discount rate applied to those payments . certain commingled equity funds , consisting of equity mutual funds , are valued using the nav . the nav valuations are based on the underlying investments and typically redeemable within 90 days . private equity funds consist of partnership and co-investment funds . the nav is based on valuation models of the underlying securities , which includes unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 12 years . real estate funds consist of partnerships , most of which are closed-end funds , for which the nav is based on valuation models and periodic appraisals . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 10 years . hedge funds consist of direct hedge funds for which the nav is generally based on the valuation of the underlying investments . redemptions in hedge funds are based on the specific terms of each fund , and generally range from a minimum of one month to several months . contributions and expected benefit payments the funding of our qualified defined benefit pension plans is determined in accordance with erisa , as amended by the ppa , and in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . we made contributions of $ 5.0 billion to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2018 , including required and discretionary contributions . as a result of these contributions , we do not expect to make contributions to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2019 . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2018 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>2023</td><td>2024 2013 2028</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>qualified defined benefit pension plans</td><td>$ 2350</td><td>$ 2390</td><td>$ 2470</td><td>$ 2550</td><td>$ 2610</td><td>$ 13670</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retiree medical and life insurance plans</td><td>170</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>170</td><td>810</td></tr></table> defined contribution plans we maintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 658 million in 2018 , $ 613 million in 2017 and $ 617 million in 2016 , the majority of which were funded using our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 33.3 million and 35.5 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017. .
Question: what is the difference in 401k contributions from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: 45.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.07341 |
CONVFINQA4313 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
6 . restricted cash sysco is required by its insurers to collateralize a part of the self-insured portion of its workers 2019 compensation and liability claims . sysco has chosen to satisfy these collateral requirements by depositing funds in insurance trusts or by issuing letters of credit . in addition , for certain acquisitions , sysco has placed funds into escrow to be disbursed to the sellers in the event that specified operating results are attained or contingencies are resolved . escrowed funds related to certain acquisitions in the amount of $ 1700000 were released during fiscal 2006 , which included $ 800000 that was disbursed to sellers . a summary of restricted cash balances appears below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>july 1 2006</td><td>july 2 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>funds deposited in insurance trusts</td><td>$ 82653000</td><td>$ 80410000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>escrow funds related to acquisitions</td><td>19621000</td><td>21321000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 102274000</td><td>$ 101731000</td></tr></table> funds deposited in insurance trusts************************************** $ 82653000 $ 80410000 escrow funds related to acquisitions ************************************* 19621000 21321000 total************************************************************* $ 102274000 $ 101731000 7 . derivative financial instruments sysco manages its debt portfolio by targeting an overall desired position of fixed and floating rates and may employ interest rate swaps from time to time to achieve this goal . the company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes . during fiscal years 2003 , 2004 and 2005 , the company entered into various interest rate swap agreements designated as fair value hedges of the related debt . the terms of these swap agreements and the hedged items were such that the hedges were considered perfectly effective against changes in the fair value of the debt due to changes in the benchmark interest rates over their terms . as a result , the shortcut method provided by sfas no . 133 , 2018 2018accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities , 2019 2019 was applied and there was no need to periodically reassess the effectiveness of the hedges during the terms of the swaps . interest expense on the debt was adjusted to include payments made or received under the hedge agreements . the fair value of the swaps was carried as an asset or a liability on the consolidated balance sheet and the carrying value of the hedged debt was adjusted accordingly . there were no fair value hedges outstanding as of july 1 , 2006 or july 2 , 2005 . the amount received upon termination of fair value hedge swap agreements was $ 5316000 and $ 1305000 in fiscal years 2005 and 2004 , respectively . there were no terminations of fair value hedge swap agreements in fiscal 2006 . the amount received upon termination of swap agreements is reflected as an increase in the carrying value of the related debt to reflect its fair value at termination . this increase in the carrying value of the debt is amortized as a reduction of interest expense over the remaining term of the debt . in march 2005 , sysco entered into a forward-starting interest rate swap with a notional amount of $ 350000000 . in accordance with sfas no . 133 , the company designated this derivative as a cash flow hedge of the variability in the cash outflows of interest payments on $ 350000000 of the september 2005 forecasted debt issuance due to changes in the benchmark interest rate . the fair value of the swap as of july 2 , 2005 was ( $ 32584000 ) , which is reflected in accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheet , with the corresponding amount reflected as a loss , net of tax , in other comprehensive income ( loss ) . in september 2005 , in conjunction with the issuance of the 5.375% ( 5.375 % ) senior notes , sysco settled the $ 350000000 notional amount forward-starting interest rate swap . upon settlement , sysco paid cash of $ 21196000 , which represented the fair value of the swap agreement at the time of settlement . this amount is being amortized as interest expense over the 30-year term of the debt , and the unamortized balance is reflected as a loss , net of tax , in other comprehensive income ( loss ) . in the normal course of business , sysco enters into forward purchase agreements for the procurement of fuel , electricity and product commodities related to sysco 2019s business . certain of these agreements meet the definition of a derivative and qualify for the normal purchase and sale exemption under relevant accounting literature . the company has elected to use this exemption for these agreements and thus they are not recorded at fair value . %%transmsg*** transmitting job : h39408 pcn : 046000000 *** %%pcmsg|44 |00010|yes|no|09/06/2006 17:22|0|1|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: what portion of total restricted cash balance is related to funds deposited in insurance trusts in 2005?
| 0.79042 |
CONVFINQA4314 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
6 . restricted cash sysco is required by its insurers to collateralize a part of the self-insured portion of its workers 2019 compensation and liability claims . sysco has chosen to satisfy these collateral requirements by depositing funds in insurance trusts or by issuing letters of credit . in addition , for certain acquisitions , sysco has placed funds into escrow to be disbursed to the sellers in the event that specified operating results are attained or contingencies are resolved . escrowed funds related to certain acquisitions in the amount of $ 1700000 were released during fiscal 2006 , which included $ 800000 that was disbursed to sellers . a summary of restricted cash balances appears below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>july 1 2006</td><td>july 2 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>funds deposited in insurance trusts</td><td>$ 82653000</td><td>$ 80410000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>escrow funds related to acquisitions</td><td>19621000</td><td>21321000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 102274000</td><td>$ 101731000</td></tr></table> funds deposited in insurance trusts************************************** $ 82653000 $ 80410000 escrow funds related to acquisitions ************************************* 19621000 21321000 total************************************************************* $ 102274000 $ 101731000 7 . derivative financial instruments sysco manages its debt portfolio by targeting an overall desired position of fixed and floating rates and may employ interest rate swaps from time to time to achieve this goal . the company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes . during fiscal years 2003 , 2004 and 2005 , the company entered into various interest rate swap agreements designated as fair value hedges of the related debt . the terms of these swap agreements and the hedged items were such that the hedges were considered perfectly effective against changes in the fair value of the debt due to changes in the benchmark interest rates over their terms . as a result , the shortcut method provided by sfas no . 133 , 2018 2018accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities , 2019 2019 was applied and there was no need to periodically reassess the effectiveness of the hedges during the terms of the swaps . interest expense on the debt was adjusted to include payments made or received under the hedge agreements . the fair value of the swaps was carried as an asset or a liability on the consolidated balance sheet and the carrying value of the hedged debt was adjusted accordingly . there were no fair value hedges outstanding as of july 1 , 2006 or july 2 , 2005 . the amount received upon termination of fair value hedge swap agreements was $ 5316000 and $ 1305000 in fiscal years 2005 and 2004 , respectively . there were no terminations of fair value hedge swap agreements in fiscal 2006 . the amount received upon termination of swap agreements is reflected as an increase in the carrying value of the related debt to reflect its fair value at termination . this increase in the carrying value of the debt is amortized as a reduction of interest expense over the remaining term of the debt . in march 2005 , sysco entered into a forward-starting interest rate swap with a notional amount of $ 350000000 . in accordance with sfas no . 133 , the company designated this derivative as a cash flow hedge of the variability in the cash outflows of interest payments on $ 350000000 of the september 2005 forecasted debt issuance due to changes in the benchmark interest rate . the fair value of the swap as of july 2 , 2005 was ( $ 32584000 ) , which is reflected in accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheet , with the corresponding amount reflected as a loss , net of tax , in other comprehensive income ( loss ) . in september 2005 , in conjunction with the issuance of the 5.375% ( 5.375 % ) senior notes , sysco settled the $ 350000000 notional amount forward-starting interest rate swap . upon settlement , sysco paid cash of $ 21196000 , which represented the fair value of the swap agreement at the time of settlement . this amount is being amortized as interest expense over the 30-year term of the debt , and the unamortized balance is reflected as a loss , net of tax , in other comprehensive income ( loss ) . in the normal course of business , sysco enters into forward purchase agreements for the procurement of fuel , electricity and product commodities related to sysco 2019s business . certain of these agreements meet the definition of a derivative and qualify for the normal purchase and sale exemption under relevant accounting literature . the company has elected to use this exemption for these agreements and thus they are not recorded at fair value . %%transmsg*** transmitting job : h39408 pcn : 046000000 *** %%pcmsg|44 |00010|yes|no|09/06/2006 17:22|0|1|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: what portion of total restricted cash balance is related to funds deposited in insurance trusts in 2005?
Answer: 0.79042
Question: what about in 2006?
| 0.80815 |
CONVFINQA4315 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy including the continued effectiveness of the clean energy standards/zero emissions credit program ( ces/zec ) , the establishment of certain long-term agreements on acceptable terms with the energy research and development authority of the state of new york in connection with the ces/zec program , and nypsc approval of the transaction on acceptable terms , entergy refueled the fitzpatrick plant in january and february 2017 . in october 2015 , entergy determined that it would close the pilgrim plant . the decision came after management 2019s extensive analysis of the economics and operating life of the plant following the nrc 2019s decision in september 2015 to place the plant in its 201cmultiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column 201d ( column 4 ) of its reactor oversight process action matrix . the pilgrim plant is expected to cease operations on may 31 , 2019 , after refueling in the spring of 2017 and operating through the end of that fuel cycle . in december 2015 , entergy wholesale commodities closed on the sale of its 583 mw rhode island state energy center ( risec ) , in johnston , rhode island . the base sales price , excluding adjustments , was approximately $ 490 million . entergy wholesale commodities purchased risec for $ 346 million in december 2011 . in december 2016 , entergy announced that it reached an agreement with consumers energy to terminate the ppa for the palisades plant on may 31 , 2018 . pursuant to the ppa termination agreement , consumers energy will pay entergy $ 172 million for the early termination of the ppa . the ppa termination agreement is subject to regulatory approvals . separately , and assuming regulatory approvals are obtained for the ppa termination agreement , entergy intends to shut down the palisades nuclear power plant permanently on october 1 , 2018 , after refueling in the spring of 2017 and operating through the end of that fuel cycle . entergy expects to enter into a new ppa with consumers energy under which the plant would continue to operate through october 1 , 2018 . in january 2017 , entergy announced that it reached a settlement with new york state to shut down indian point 2 by april 30 , 2020 and indian point 3 by april 30 , 2021 , and resolve all new york state-initiated legal challenges to indian point 2019s operating license renewal . as part of the settlement , new york state has agreed to issue indian point 2019s water quality certification and coastal zone management act consistency certification and to withdraw its objection to license renewal before the nrc . new york state also has agreed to issue a water discharge permit , which is required regardless of whether the plant is seeking a renewed nrc license . the shutdowns are conditioned , among other things , upon such actions being taken by new york state . even without opposition , the nrc license renewal process is expected to continue at least into 2018 . with the settlement concerning indian point , entergy now has announced plans for the disposition of all of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants , including the sales of vermont yankee and fitzpatrick , and the earlier than previously expected shutdowns of pilgrim , palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 . see 201centergy wholesale commodities exit from the merchant power business 201d for further discussion . property nuclear generating stations entergy wholesale commodities includes the ownership of the following nuclear power plants : power plant market service year acquired location capacity - reactor type license expiration . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>power plant</td><td>market</td><td>in service year</td><td>acquired</td><td>location</td><td>capacity - reactor type</td><td>license expiration date</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pilgrim ( a )</td><td>is0-ne</td><td>1972</td><td>july 1999</td><td>plymouth ma</td><td>688 mw - boiling water</td><td>2032 ( a )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fitzpatrick ( b )</td><td>nyiso</td><td>1975</td><td>nov . 2000</td><td>oswego ny</td><td>838 mw - boiling water</td><td>2034 ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>indian point 3 ( c )</td><td>nyiso</td><td>1976</td><td>nov . 2000</td><td>buchanan ny</td><td>1041 mw - pressurized water</td><td>2015 ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>indian point 2 ( c )</td><td>nyiso</td><td>1974</td><td>sept . 2001</td><td>buchanan ny</td><td>1028 mw - pressurized water</td><td>2013 ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>vermont yankee ( d )</td><td>is0-ne</td><td>1972</td><td>july 2002</td><td>vernon vt</td><td>605 mw - boiling water</td><td>2032 ( d )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>palisades ( e )</td><td>miso</td><td>1971</td><td>apr . 2007</td><td>covert mi</td><td>811 mw - pressurized water</td><td>2031 ( e )</td></tr></table> .
Question: after the last refueling of the pilgrim plant, how many years did it take to close it?
| 2.0 |
CONVFINQA4316 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy including the continued effectiveness of the clean energy standards/zero emissions credit program ( ces/zec ) , the establishment of certain long-term agreements on acceptable terms with the energy research and development authority of the state of new york in connection with the ces/zec program , and nypsc approval of the transaction on acceptable terms , entergy refueled the fitzpatrick plant in january and february 2017 . in october 2015 , entergy determined that it would close the pilgrim plant . the decision came after management 2019s extensive analysis of the economics and operating life of the plant following the nrc 2019s decision in september 2015 to place the plant in its 201cmultiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column 201d ( column 4 ) of its reactor oversight process action matrix . the pilgrim plant is expected to cease operations on may 31 , 2019 , after refueling in the spring of 2017 and operating through the end of that fuel cycle . in december 2015 , entergy wholesale commodities closed on the sale of its 583 mw rhode island state energy center ( risec ) , in johnston , rhode island . the base sales price , excluding adjustments , was approximately $ 490 million . entergy wholesale commodities purchased risec for $ 346 million in december 2011 . in december 2016 , entergy announced that it reached an agreement with consumers energy to terminate the ppa for the palisades plant on may 31 , 2018 . pursuant to the ppa termination agreement , consumers energy will pay entergy $ 172 million for the early termination of the ppa . the ppa termination agreement is subject to regulatory approvals . separately , and assuming regulatory approvals are obtained for the ppa termination agreement , entergy intends to shut down the palisades nuclear power plant permanently on october 1 , 2018 , after refueling in the spring of 2017 and operating through the end of that fuel cycle . entergy expects to enter into a new ppa with consumers energy under which the plant would continue to operate through october 1 , 2018 . in january 2017 , entergy announced that it reached a settlement with new york state to shut down indian point 2 by april 30 , 2020 and indian point 3 by april 30 , 2021 , and resolve all new york state-initiated legal challenges to indian point 2019s operating license renewal . as part of the settlement , new york state has agreed to issue indian point 2019s water quality certification and coastal zone management act consistency certification and to withdraw its objection to license renewal before the nrc . new york state also has agreed to issue a water discharge permit , which is required regardless of whether the plant is seeking a renewed nrc license . the shutdowns are conditioned , among other things , upon such actions being taken by new york state . even without opposition , the nrc license renewal process is expected to continue at least into 2018 . with the settlement concerning indian point , entergy now has announced plans for the disposition of all of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants , including the sales of vermont yankee and fitzpatrick , and the earlier than previously expected shutdowns of pilgrim , palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 . see 201centergy wholesale commodities exit from the merchant power business 201d for further discussion . property nuclear generating stations entergy wholesale commodities includes the ownership of the following nuclear power plants : power plant market service year acquired location capacity - reactor type license expiration . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>power plant</td><td>market</td><td>in service year</td><td>acquired</td><td>location</td><td>capacity - reactor type</td><td>license expiration date</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pilgrim ( a )</td><td>is0-ne</td><td>1972</td><td>july 1999</td><td>plymouth ma</td><td>688 mw - boiling water</td><td>2032 ( a )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fitzpatrick ( b )</td><td>nyiso</td><td>1975</td><td>nov . 2000</td><td>oswego ny</td><td>838 mw - boiling water</td><td>2034 ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>indian point 3 ( c )</td><td>nyiso</td><td>1976</td><td>nov . 2000</td><td>buchanan ny</td><td>1041 mw - pressurized water</td><td>2015 ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>indian point 2 ( c )</td><td>nyiso</td><td>1974</td><td>sept . 2001</td><td>buchanan ny</td><td>1028 mw - pressurized water</td><td>2013 ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>vermont yankee ( d )</td><td>is0-ne</td><td>1972</td><td>july 2002</td><td>vernon vt</td><td>605 mw - boiling water</td><td>2032 ( d )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>palisades ( e )</td><td>miso</td><td>1971</td><td>apr . 2007</td><td>covert mi</td><td>811 mw - pressurized water</td><td>2031 ( e )</td></tr></table> .
Question: after the last refueling of the pilgrim plant, how many years did it take to close it?
Answer: 2.0
Question: and concerning the boiling water reactors, what was their total mw capacity for that pilgrim plant and the fitzpatrick power plant?
| 1526.0 |
CONVFINQA4317 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy including the continued effectiveness of the clean energy standards/zero emissions credit program ( ces/zec ) , the establishment of certain long-term agreements on acceptable terms with the energy research and development authority of the state of new york in connection with the ces/zec program , and nypsc approval of the transaction on acceptable terms , entergy refueled the fitzpatrick plant in january and february 2017 . in october 2015 , entergy determined that it would close the pilgrim plant . the decision came after management 2019s extensive analysis of the economics and operating life of the plant following the nrc 2019s decision in september 2015 to place the plant in its 201cmultiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column 201d ( column 4 ) of its reactor oversight process action matrix . the pilgrim plant is expected to cease operations on may 31 , 2019 , after refueling in the spring of 2017 and operating through the end of that fuel cycle . in december 2015 , entergy wholesale commodities closed on the sale of its 583 mw rhode island state energy center ( risec ) , in johnston , rhode island . the base sales price , excluding adjustments , was approximately $ 490 million . entergy wholesale commodities purchased risec for $ 346 million in december 2011 . in december 2016 , entergy announced that it reached an agreement with consumers energy to terminate the ppa for the palisades plant on may 31 , 2018 . pursuant to the ppa termination agreement , consumers energy will pay entergy $ 172 million for the early termination of the ppa . the ppa termination agreement is subject to regulatory approvals . separately , and assuming regulatory approvals are obtained for the ppa termination agreement , entergy intends to shut down the palisades nuclear power plant permanently on october 1 , 2018 , after refueling in the spring of 2017 and operating through the end of that fuel cycle . entergy expects to enter into a new ppa with consumers energy under which the plant would continue to operate through october 1 , 2018 . in january 2017 , entergy announced that it reached a settlement with new york state to shut down indian point 2 by april 30 , 2020 and indian point 3 by april 30 , 2021 , and resolve all new york state-initiated legal challenges to indian point 2019s operating license renewal . as part of the settlement , new york state has agreed to issue indian point 2019s water quality certification and coastal zone management act consistency certification and to withdraw its objection to license renewal before the nrc . new york state also has agreed to issue a water discharge permit , which is required regardless of whether the plant is seeking a renewed nrc license . the shutdowns are conditioned , among other things , upon such actions being taken by new york state . even without opposition , the nrc license renewal process is expected to continue at least into 2018 . with the settlement concerning indian point , entergy now has announced plans for the disposition of all of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants , including the sales of vermont yankee and fitzpatrick , and the earlier than previously expected shutdowns of pilgrim , palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 . see 201centergy wholesale commodities exit from the merchant power business 201d for further discussion . property nuclear generating stations entergy wholesale commodities includes the ownership of the following nuclear power plants : power plant market service year acquired location capacity - reactor type license expiration . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>power plant</td><td>market</td><td>in service year</td><td>acquired</td><td>location</td><td>capacity - reactor type</td><td>license expiration date</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pilgrim ( a )</td><td>is0-ne</td><td>1972</td><td>july 1999</td><td>plymouth ma</td><td>688 mw - boiling water</td><td>2032 ( a )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fitzpatrick ( b )</td><td>nyiso</td><td>1975</td><td>nov . 2000</td><td>oswego ny</td><td>838 mw - boiling water</td><td>2034 ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>indian point 3 ( c )</td><td>nyiso</td><td>1976</td><td>nov . 2000</td><td>buchanan ny</td><td>1041 mw - pressurized water</td><td>2015 ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>indian point 2 ( c )</td><td>nyiso</td><td>1974</td><td>sept . 2001</td><td>buchanan ny</td><td>1028 mw - pressurized water</td><td>2013 ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>vermont yankee ( d )</td><td>is0-ne</td><td>1972</td><td>july 2002</td><td>vernon vt</td><td>605 mw - boiling water</td><td>2032 ( d )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>palisades ( e )</td><td>miso</td><td>1971</td><td>apr . 2007</td><td>covert mi</td><td>811 mw - pressurized water</td><td>2031 ( e )</td></tr></table> .
Question: after the last refueling of the pilgrim plant, how many years did it take to close it?
Answer: 2.0
Question: and concerning the boiling water reactors, what was their total mw capacity for that pilgrim plant and the fitzpatrick power plant?
Answer: 1526.0
Question: including the vermont yankee plant, what becomes this total capacity for the three boiling water reactors?
| 2131.0 |
CONVFINQA4318 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
on a regular basis our special asset committee closely monitors loans , primarily commercial loans , that are not included in the nonperforming or accruing past due categories and for which we are uncertain about the borrower 2019s ability to comply with existing repayment terms . these loans totaled $ .2 billion at both december 31 , 2014 and december 31 , 2013 . home equity loan portfolio our home equity loan portfolio totaled $ 34.7 billion as of december 31 , 2014 , or 17% ( 17 % ) of the total loan portfolio . of that total , $ 20.4 billion , or 59% ( 59 % ) , was outstanding under primarily variable-rate home equity lines of credit and $ 14.3 billion , or 41% ( 41 % ) , consisted of closed-end home equity installment loans . approximately 3% ( 3 % ) of the home equity portfolio was on nonperforming status as of december 31 , 2014 . as of december 31 , 2014 , we are in an originated first lien position for approximately 51% ( 51 % ) of the total portfolio and , where originated as a second lien , we currently hold or service the first lien position for approximately an additional 2% ( 2 % ) of the portfolio . the remaining 47% ( 47 % ) of the portfolio was secured by second liens where we do not hold the first lien position . the credit performance of the majority of the home equity portfolio where we are in , hold or service the first lien position , is superior to the portion of the portfolio where we hold the second lien position but do not hold the first lien . lien position information is generally based upon original ltv at the time of origination . however , after origination pnc is not typically notified when a senior lien position that is not held by pnc is satisfied . therefore , information about the current lien status of junior lien loans is less readily available in cases where pnc does not also hold the senior lien . additionally , pnc is not typically notified when a junior lien position is added after origination of a pnc first lien . this updated information for both junior and senior liens must be obtained from external sources , and therefore , pnc has contracted with an industry-leading third-party service provider to obtain updated loan , lien and collateral data that is aggregated from public and private sources . we track borrower performance monthly , including obtaining original ltvs , updated fico scores at least quarterly , updated ltvs semi-annually , and other credit metrics at least quarterly , including the historical performance of any mortgage loans regardless of lien position that we do or do not hold . this information is used for internal reporting and risk management . for internal reporting and risk management we also segment the population into pools based on product type ( e.g. , home equity loans , brokered home equity loans , home equity lines of credit , brokered home equity lines of credit ) . as part of our overall risk analysis and monitoring , we segment the home equity portfolio based upon the delinquency , modification status and bankruptcy status of these loans , as well as the delinquency , modification status and bankruptcy status of any mortgage loan with the same borrower ( regardless of whether it is a first lien senior to our second lien ) . in establishing our alll for non-impaired loans , we primarily utilize a delinquency roll-rate methodology for pools of loans . in accordance with accounting principles , under this methodology , we establish our allowance based upon incurred losses , not lifetime expected losses . the roll-rate methodology estimates transition/roll of loan balances from one delinquency state ( e.g. , 30-59 days past due ) to another delinquency state ( e.g. , 60-89 days past due ) and ultimately to charge-off . the roll through to charge-off is based on pnc 2019s actual loss experience for each type of pool . each of our home equity pools contains both first and second liens . our experience has been that the ratio of first to second lien loans has been consistent over time and the charge-off amounts for the pools , used to establish our allowance , include losses on both first and second liens loans . generally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20-year amortization term . during the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay either interest or principal and interest . we view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments . the risk associated with the borrower 2019s ability to satisfy the loan terms upon the draw period ending is considered in establishing our alll . based upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2014 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end . table 36 : home equity lines of credit 2013 draw period end in millions interest only product principal and interest product . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>interest onlyproduct</td><td>principal andinterest product</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 1597</td><td>$ 541</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>1366</td><td>437</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>2434</td><td>596</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2018</td><td>1072</td><td>813</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2019 and thereafter</td><td>3880</td><td>5391</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total ( a ) ( b )</td><td>$ 10349</td><td>$ 7778</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes all home equity lines of credit that mature in 2015 or later , including those with borrowers where we have terminated borrowing privileges . ( b ) includes approximately $ 154 million , $ 48 million , $ 57 million , $ 42 million and $ 564 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments , including those where we have terminated borrowing privileges , with draw periods scheduled to end in 2015 , 2016 , 2017 , 2018 and 2019 and thereafter , respectively . 76 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what is the total loan portfolio value based on the percentage of the portfolio made up by home equity loans?
| 2.04118 |
CONVFINQA4319 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
on a regular basis our special asset committee closely monitors loans , primarily commercial loans , that are not included in the nonperforming or accruing past due categories and for which we are uncertain about the borrower 2019s ability to comply with existing repayment terms . these loans totaled $ .2 billion at both december 31 , 2014 and december 31 , 2013 . home equity loan portfolio our home equity loan portfolio totaled $ 34.7 billion as of december 31 , 2014 , or 17% ( 17 % ) of the total loan portfolio . of that total , $ 20.4 billion , or 59% ( 59 % ) , was outstanding under primarily variable-rate home equity lines of credit and $ 14.3 billion , or 41% ( 41 % ) , consisted of closed-end home equity installment loans . approximately 3% ( 3 % ) of the home equity portfolio was on nonperforming status as of december 31 , 2014 . as of december 31 , 2014 , we are in an originated first lien position for approximately 51% ( 51 % ) of the total portfolio and , where originated as a second lien , we currently hold or service the first lien position for approximately an additional 2% ( 2 % ) of the portfolio . the remaining 47% ( 47 % ) of the portfolio was secured by second liens where we do not hold the first lien position . the credit performance of the majority of the home equity portfolio where we are in , hold or service the first lien position , is superior to the portion of the portfolio where we hold the second lien position but do not hold the first lien . lien position information is generally based upon original ltv at the time of origination . however , after origination pnc is not typically notified when a senior lien position that is not held by pnc is satisfied . therefore , information about the current lien status of junior lien loans is less readily available in cases where pnc does not also hold the senior lien . additionally , pnc is not typically notified when a junior lien position is added after origination of a pnc first lien . this updated information for both junior and senior liens must be obtained from external sources , and therefore , pnc has contracted with an industry-leading third-party service provider to obtain updated loan , lien and collateral data that is aggregated from public and private sources . we track borrower performance monthly , including obtaining original ltvs , updated fico scores at least quarterly , updated ltvs semi-annually , and other credit metrics at least quarterly , including the historical performance of any mortgage loans regardless of lien position that we do or do not hold . this information is used for internal reporting and risk management . for internal reporting and risk management we also segment the population into pools based on product type ( e.g. , home equity loans , brokered home equity loans , home equity lines of credit , brokered home equity lines of credit ) . as part of our overall risk analysis and monitoring , we segment the home equity portfolio based upon the delinquency , modification status and bankruptcy status of these loans , as well as the delinquency , modification status and bankruptcy status of any mortgage loan with the same borrower ( regardless of whether it is a first lien senior to our second lien ) . in establishing our alll for non-impaired loans , we primarily utilize a delinquency roll-rate methodology for pools of loans . in accordance with accounting principles , under this methodology , we establish our allowance based upon incurred losses , not lifetime expected losses . the roll-rate methodology estimates transition/roll of loan balances from one delinquency state ( e.g. , 30-59 days past due ) to another delinquency state ( e.g. , 60-89 days past due ) and ultimately to charge-off . the roll through to charge-off is based on pnc 2019s actual loss experience for each type of pool . each of our home equity pools contains both first and second liens . our experience has been that the ratio of first to second lien loans has been consistent over time and the charge-off amounts for the pools , used to establish our allowance , include losses on both first and second liens loans . generally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20-year amortization term . during the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay either interest or principal and interest . we view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments . the risk associated with the borrower 2019s ability to satisfy the loan terms upon the draw period ending is considered in establishing our alll . based upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2014 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end . table 36 : home equity lines of credit 2013 draw period end in millions interest only product principal and interest product . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>interest onlyproduct</td><td>principal andinterest product</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 1597</td><td>$ 541</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>1366</td><td>437</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>2434</td><td>596</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2018</td><td>1072</td><td>813</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2019 and thereafter</td><td>3880</td><td>5391</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total ( a ) ( b )</td><td>$ 10349</td><td>$ 7778</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes all home equity lines of credit that mature in 2015 or later , including those with borrowers where we have terminated borrowing privileges . ( b ) includes approximately $ 154 million , $ 48 million , $ 57 million , $ 42 million and $ 564 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments , including those where we have terminated borrowing privileges , with draw periods scheduled to end in 2015 , 2016 , 2017 , 2018 and 2019 and thereafter , respectively . 76 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what is the total loan portfolio value based on the percentage of the portfolio made up by home equity loans?
Answer: 2.04118
Question: and in billions?
| 204.11765 |
CONVFINQA4320 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
exchanged installment notes totaling approximately $ 4.8 billion and approximately $ 400 million of inter- national paper promissory notes for interests in enti- ties formed to monetize the notes . international paper determined that it was not the primary benefi- ciary of these entities , and therefore should not consolidate its investments in these entities . during 2006 , these entities acquired an additional $ 4.8 bil- lion of international paper debt securities for cash , resulting in a total of approximately $ 5.2 billion of international paper debt obligations held by these entities at december 31 , 2006 . since international paper has , and intends to affect , a legal right to offset its obligations under these debt instruments with its investments in the entities , international paper has offset $ 5.0 billion of interest in the entities against $ 5.0 billion of international paper debt obligations held by the entities as of december 31 , 2007 . international paper also holds variable interests in two financing entities that were used to monetize long-term notes received from sales of forestlands in 2002 and 2001 . see note 8 of the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data for a further discussion of these transactions . capital resources outlook for 2008 international paper expects to be able to meet pro- jected capital expenditures , service existing debt and meet working capital and dividend requirements during 2008 through current cash balances and cash from operations , supplemented as required by its various existing credit facilities . international paper has approximately $ 2.5 billion of committed bank credit agreements , which management believes is adequate to cover expected operating cash flow variability during our industry 2019s economic cycles . the agreements generally provide for interest rates at a floating rate index plus a pre-determined margin dependent upon international paper 2019s credit rating . the agreements include a $ 1.5 billion fully commit- ted revolving bank credit agreement that expires in march 2011 and has a facility fee of 0.10% ( 0.10 % ) payable quarterly . these agreements also include up to $ 1.0 billion of available commercial paper-based financ- ings under a receivables securitization program that expires in october 2009 with a facility fee of 0.10% ( 0.10 % ) . at december 31 , 2007 , there were no borrowings under either the bank credit agreements or receiv- ables securitization program . the company will continue to rely upon debt and capital markets for the majority of any necessary long-term funding not provided by operating cash flows . funding decisions will be guided by our capi- tal structure planning objectives . the primary goals of the company 2019s capital structure planning are to maximize financial flexibility and preserve liquidity while reducing interest expense . the majority of international paper 2019s debt is accessed through global public capital markets where we have a wide base of investors . the company was in compliance with all its debt covenants at december 31 , 2007 . principal financial covenants include maintenance of a minimum net worth , defined as the sum of common stock , paid-in capital and retained earnings , less treasury stock , plus any goodwill impairment charges , of $ 9 billion ; and a maximum total debt to capital ratio , defined as total debt divided by total debt plus net worth , of 60% ( 60 % ) . maintaining an investment grade credit rating is an important element of international paper 2019s financing strategy . at december 31 , 2007 , the company held long-term credit ratings of bbb ( stable outlook ) and baa3 ( stable outlook ) by standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) and moody 2019s investor services ( moody 2019s ) , respectively . the company currently has short-term credit ratings by s&p and moody 2019s of a-2 and p-3 , respectively . contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2007 , were as follows : in millions 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 thereafter maturities of long-term debt ( a ) $ 267 $ 1300 $ 1069 $ 396 $ 532 $ 3056 debt obligations with right of offset ( b ) 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 5000 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>maturities of long-term debt ( a )</td><td>$ 267</td><td>$ 1300</td><td>$ 1069</td><td>$ 396</td><td>$ 532</td><td>$ 3056</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt obligations with right of offset ( b )</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>5000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>136</td><td>116</td><td>101</td><td>84</td><td>67</td><td>92</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations ( c )</td><td>1953</td><td>294</td><td>261</td><td>235</td><td>212</td><td>1480</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total ( d )</td><td>$ 2356</td><td>$ 1710</td><td>$ 1431</td><td>$ 715</td><td>$ 811</td><td>$ 9628</td></tr></table> ( a ) total debt includes scheduled principal payments only . ( b ) represents debt obligations borrowed from non-consolidated variable interest entities for which international paper has , and intends to affect , a legal right to offset these obligations with investments held in the entities . accordingly , in its con- solidated balance sheet at december 31 , 2007 , international paper has offset approximately $ 5.0 billion of interests in the entities against this $ 5.0 billion of debt obligations held by the entities ( see note 8 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements ) . ( c ) includes $ 2.1 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the transformation plan forestland sales . ( d ) not included in the above table are unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $ 280 million. .
Question: as of december 31, 2007, what was the amount of the maturities of long-term debt from the contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations for 2008?
| 267.0 |
CONVFINQA4321 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
exchanged installment notes totaling approximately $ 4.8 billion and approximately $ 400 million of inter- national paper promissory notes for interests in enti- ties formed to monetize the notes . international paper determined that it was not the primary benefi- ciary of these entities , and therefore should not consolidate its investments in these entities . during 2006 , these entities acquired an additional $ 4.8 bil- lion of international paper debt securities for cash , resulting in a total of approximately $ 5.2 billion of international paper debt obligations held by these entities at december 31 , 2006 . since international paper has , and intends to affect , a legal right to offset its obligations under these debt instruments with its investments in the entities , international paper has offset $ 5.0 billion of interest in the entities against $ 5.0 billion of international paper debt obligations held by the entities as of december 31 , 2007 . international paper also holds variable interests in two financing entities that were used to monetize long-term notes received from sales of forestlands in 2002 and 2001 . see note 8 of the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data for a further discussion of these transactions . capital resources outlook for 2008 international paper expects to be able to meet pro- jected capital expenditures , service existing debt and meet working capital and dividend requirements during 2008 through current cash balances and cash from operations , supplemented as required by its various existing credit facilities . international paper has approximately $ 2.5 billion of committed bank credit agreements , which management believes is adequate to cover expected operating cash flow variability during our industry 2019s economic cycles . the agreements generally provide for interest rates at a floating rate index plus a pre-determined margin dependent upon international paper 2019s credit rating . the agreements include a $ 1.5 billion fully commit- ted revolving bank credit agreement that expires in march 2011 and has a facility fee of 0.10% ( 0.10 % ) payable quarterly . these agreements also include up to $ 1.0 billion of available commercial paper-based financ- ings under a receivables securitization program that expires in october 2009 with a facility fee of 0.10% ( 0.10 % ) . at december 31 , 2007 , there were no borrowings under either the bank credit agreements or receiv- ables securitization program . the company will continue to rely upon debt and capital markets for the majority of any necessary long-term funding not provided by operating cash flows . funding decisions will be guided by our capi- tal structure planning objectives . the primary goals of the company 2019s capital structure planning are to maximize financial flexibility and preserve liquidity while reducing interest expense . the majority of international paper 2019s debt is accessed through global public capital markets where we have a wide base of investors . the company was in compliance with all its debt covenants at december 31 , 2007 . principal financial covenants include maintenance of a minimum net worth , defined as the sum of common stock , paid-in capital and retained earnings , less treasury stock , plus any goodwill impairment charges , of $ 9 billion ; and a maximum total debt to capital ratio , defined as total debt divided by total debt plus net worth , of 60% ( 60 % ) . maintaining an investment grade credit rating is an important element of international paper 2019s financing strategy . at december 31 , 2007 , the company held long-term credit ratings of bbb ( stable outlook ) and baa3 ( stable outlook ) by standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) and moody 2019s investor services ( moody 2019s ) , respectively . the company currently has short-term credit ratings by s&p and moody 2019s of a-2 and p-3 , respectively . contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2007 , were as follows : in millions 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 thereafter maturities of long-term debt ( a ) $ 267 $ 1300 $ 1069 $ 396 $ 532 $ 3056 debt obligations with right of offset ( b ) 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 5000 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>maturities of long-term debt ( a )</td><td>$ 267</td><td>$ 1300</td><td>$ 1069</td><td>$ 396</td><td>$ 532</td><td>$ 3056</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt obligations with right of offset ( b )</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>5000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>136</td><td>116</td><td>101</td><td>84</td><td>67</td><td>92</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations ( c )</td><td>1953</td><td>294</td><td>261</td><td>235</td><td>212</td><td>1480</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total ( d )</td><td>$ 2356</td><td>$ 1710</td><td>$ 1431</td><td>$ 715</td><td>$ 811</td><td>$ 9628</td></tr></table> ( a ) total debt includes scheduled principal payments only . ( b ) represents debt obligations borrowed from non-consolidated variable interest entities for which international paper has , and intends to affect , a legal right to offset these obligations with investments held in the entities . accordingly , in its con- solidated balance sheet at december 31 , 2007 , international paper has offset approximately $ 5.0 billion of interests in the entities against this $ 5.0 billion of debt obligations held by the entities ( see note 8 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements ) . ( c ) includes $ 2.1 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the transformation plan forestland sales . ( d ) not included in the above table are unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $ 280 million. .
Question: as of december 31, 2007, what was the amount of the maturities of long-term debt from the contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations for 2008?
Answer: 267.0
Question: and what was the total of those contractual obligations?
| 2356.0 |
CONVFINQA4322 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
exchanged installment notes totaling approximately $ 4.8 billion and approximately $ 400 million of inter- national paper promissory notes for interests in enti- ties formed to monetize the notes . international paper determined that it was not the primary benefi- ciary of these entities , and therefore should not consolidate its investments in these entities . during 2006 , these entities acquired an additional $ 4.8 bil- lion of international paper debt securities for cash , resulting in a total of approximately $ 5.2 billion of international paper debt obligations held by these entities at december 31 , 2006 . since international paper has , and intends to affect , a legal right to offset its obligations under these debt instruments with its investments in the entities , international paper has offset $ 5.0 billion of interest in the entities against $ 5.0 billion of international paper debt obligations held by the entities as of december 31 , 2007 . international paper also holds variable interests in two financing entities that were used to monetize long-term notes received from sales of forestlands in 2002 and 2001 . see note 8 of the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data for a further discussion of these transactions . capital resources outlook for 2008 international paper expects to be able to meet pro- jected capital expenditures , service existing debt and meet working capital and dividend requirements during 2008 through current cash balances and cash from operations , supplemented as required by its various existing credit facilities . international paper has approximately $ 2.5 billion of committed bank credit agreements , which management believes is adequate to cover expected operating cash flow variability during our industry 2019s economic cycles . the agreements generally provide for interest rates at a floating rate index plus a pre-determined margin dependent upon international paper 2019s credit rating . the agreements include a $ 1.5 billion fully commit- ted revolving bank credit agreement that expires in march 2011 and has a facility fee of 0.10% ( 0.10 % ) payable quarterly . these agreements also include up to $ 1.0 billion of available commercial paper-based financ- ings under a receivables securitization program that expires in october 2009 with a facility fee of 0.10% ( 0.10 % ) . at december 31 , 2007 , there were no borrowings under either the bank credit agreements or receiv- ables securitization program . the company will continue to rely upon debt and capital markets for the majority of any necessary long-term funding not provided by operating cash flows . funding decisions will be guided by our capi- tal structure planning objectives . the primary goals of the company 2019s capital structure planning are to maximize financial flexibility and preserve liquidity while reducing interest expense . the majority of international paper 2019s debt is accessed through global public capital markets where we have a wide base of investors . the company was in compliance with all its debt covenants at december 31 , 2007 . principal financial covenants include maintenance of a minimum net worth , defined as the sum of common stock , paid-in capital and retained earnings , less treasury stock , plus any goodwill impairment charges , of $ 9 billion ; and a maximum total debt to capital ratio , defined as total debt divided by total debt plus net worth , of 60% ( 60 % ) . maintaining an investment grade credit rating is an important element of international paper 2019s financing strategy . at december 31 , 2007 , the company held long-term credit ratings of bbb ( stable outlook ) and baa3 ( stable outlook ) by standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) and moody 2019s investor services ( moody 2019s ) , respectively . the company currently has short-term credit ratings by s&p and moody 2019s of a-2 and p-3 , respectively . contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2007 , were as follows : in millions 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 thereafter maturities of long-term debt ( a ) $ 267 $ 1300 $ 1069 $ 396 $ 532 $ 3056 debt obligations with right of offset ( b ) 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 5000 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>maturities of long-term debt ( a )</td><td>$ 267</td><td>$ 1300</td><td>$ 1069</td><td>$ 396</td><td>$ 532</td><td>$ 3056</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt obligations with right of offset ( b )</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>5000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>136</td><td>116</td><td>101</td><td>84</td><td>67</td><td>92</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations ( c )</td><td>1953</td><td>294</td><td>261</td><td>235</td><td>212</td><td>1480</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total ( d )</td><td>$ 2356</td><td>$ 1710</td><td>$ 1431</td><td>$ 715</td><td>$ 811</td><td>$ 9628</td></tr></table> ( a ) total debt includes scheduled principal payments only . ( b ) represents debt obligations borrowed from non-consolidated variable interest entities for which international paper has , and intends to affect , a legal right to offset these obligations with investments held in the entities . accordingly , in its con- solidated balance sheet at december 31 , 2007 , international paper has offset approximately $ 5.0 billion of interests in the entities against this $ 5.0 billion of debt obligations held by the entities ( see note 8 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements ) . ( c ) includes $ 2.1 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the transformation plan forestland sales . ( d ) not included in the above table are unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $ 280 million. .
Question: as of december 31, 2007, what was the amount of the maturities of long-term debt from the contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations for 2008?
Answer: 267.0
Question: and what was the total of those contractual obligations?
Answer: 2356.0
Question: what percentage, then, of this total did that amount represent?
| 0.11333 |
CONVFINQA4323 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
exchanged installment notes totaling approximately $ 4.8 billion and approximately $ 400 million of inter- national paper promissory notes for interests in enti- ties formed to monetize the notes . international paper determined that it was not the primary benefi- ciary of these entities , and therefore should not consolidate its investments in these entities . during 2006 , these entities acquired an additional $ 4.8 bil- lion of international paper debt securities for cash , resulting in a total of approximately $ 5.2 billion of international paper debt obligations held by these entities at december 31 , 2006 . since international paper has , and intends to affect , a legal right to offset its obligations under these debt instruments with its investments in the entities , international paper has offset $ 5.0 billion of interest in the entities against $ 5.0 billion of international paper debt obligations held by the entities as of december 31 , 2007 . international paper also holds variable interests in two financing entities that were used to monetize long-term notes received from sales of forestlands in 2002 and 2001 . see note 8 of the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data for a further discussion of these transactions . capital resources outlook for 2008 international paper expects to be able to meet pro- jected capital expenditures , service existing debt and meet working capital and dividend requirements during 2008 through current cash balances and cash from operations , supplemented as required by its various existing credit facilities . international paper has approximately $ 2.5 billion of committed bank credit agreements , which management believes is adequate to cover expected operating cash flow variability during our industry 2019s economic cycles . the agreements generally provide for interest rates at a floating rate index plus a pre-determined margin dependent upon international paper 2019s credit rating . the agreements include a $ 1.5 billion fully commit- ted revolving bank credit agreement that expires in march 2011 and has a facility fee of 0.10% ( 0.10 % ) payable quarterly . these agreements also include up to $ 1.0 billion of available commercial paper-based financ- ings under a receivables securitization program that expires in october 2009 with a facility fee of 0.10% ( 0.10 % ) . at december 31 , 2007 , there were no borrowings under either the bank credit agreements or receiv- ables securitization program . the company will continue to rely upon debt and capital markets for the majority of any necessary long-term funding not provided by operating cash flows . funding decisions will be guided by our capi- tal structure planning objectives . the primary goals of the company 2019s capital structure planning are to maximize financial flexibility and preserve liquidity while reducing interest expense . the majority of international paper 2019s debt is accessed through global public capital markets where we have a wide base of investors . the company was in compliance with all its debt covenants at december 31 , 2007 . principal financial covenants include maintenance of a minimum net worth , defined as the sum of common stock , paid-in capital and retained earnings , less treasury stock , plus any goodwill impairment charges , of $ 9 billion ; and a maximum total debt to capital ratio , defined as total debt divided by total debt plus net worth , of 60% ( 60 % ) . maintaining an investment grade credit rating is an important element of international paper 2019s financing strategy . at december 31 , 2007 , the company held long-term credit ratings of bbb ( stable outlook ) and baa3 ( stable outlook ) by standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) and moody 2019s investor services ( moody 2019s ) , respectively . the company currently has short-term credit ratings by s&p and moody 2019s of a-2 and p-3 , respectively . contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2007 , were as follows : in millions 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 thereafter maturities of long-term debt ( a ) $ 267 $ 1300 $ 1069 $ 396 $ 532 $ 3056 debt obligations with right of offset ( b ) 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 5000 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>maturities of long-term debt ( a )</td><td>$ 267</td><td>$ 1300</td><td>$ 1069</td><td>$ 396</td><td>$ 532</td><td>$ 3056</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt obligations with right of offset ( b )</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>5000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>136</td><td>116</td><td>101</td><td>84</td><td>67</td><td>92</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations ( c )</td><td>1953</td><td>294</td><td>261</td><td>235</td><td>212</td><td>1480</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total ( d )</td><td>$ 2356</td><td>$ 1710</td><td>$ 1431</td><td>$ 715</td><td>$ 811</td><td>$ 9628</td></tr></table> ( a ) total debt includes scheduled principal payments only . ( b ) represents debt obligations borrowed from non-consolidated variable interest entities for which international paper has , and intends to affect , a legal right to offset these obligations with investments held in the entities . accordingly , in its con- solidated balance sheet at december 31 , 2007 , international paper has offset approximately $ 5.0 billion of interests in the entities against this $ 5.0 billion of debt obligations held by the entities ( see note 8 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements ) . ( c ) includes $ 2.1 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the transformation plan forestland sales . ( d ) not included in the above table are unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $ 280 million. .
Question: as of december 31, 2007, what was the amount of the maturities of long-term debt from the contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations for 2008?
Answer: 267.0
Question: and what was the total of those contractual obligations?
Answer: 2356.0
Question: what percentage, then, of this total did that amount represent?
Answer: 0.11333
Question: and what was this percentage representation for the next year, of 2009?
| 0.76023 |
CONVFINQA4324 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 20776</td><td>$ 18884</td><td>$ 20963</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-18073 ( 18073 )</td><td>-14060 ( 14060 )</td><td>-10301 ( 10301 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash used for financing activities</td><td>-5498 ( 5498 )</td><td>-1408 ( 1408 )</td><td>-11100 ( 11100 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2804 ( 2804 )</td><td>$ 3413</td><td>$ -433 ( 433 )</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in certain assets and liabilities . for 2013 compared to 2012 , the $ 1.9 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income in 2013 . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2013 compared to 2012 were $ 1.1 billion lower due to lower income before taxes in 2013 and 2012 income tax overpayments . changes in assets and liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 , compared to december 29 , 2012 , included lower income taxes payable and receivable resulting from a reduction in taxes due in 2013 , and lower inventories due to the sell-through of older-generation products , partially offset by the ramp of 4th generation intel core processor family products . for 2013 , our three largest customers accounted for 44% ( 44 % ) of our net revenue ( 43% ( 43 % ) in 2012 and 2011 ) , with hewlett- packard company accounting for 17% ( 17 % ) of our net revenue ( 18% ( 18 % ) in 2012 and 19% ( 19 % ) in 2011 ) , dell accounting for 15% ( 15 % ) of our net revenue ( 14% ( 14 % ) in 2012 and 15% ( 15 % ) in 2011 ) , and lenovo accounting for 12% ( 12 % ) of our net revenue ( 11% ( 11 % ) in 2012 and 9% ( 9 % ) in 2011 ) . these three customers accounted for 34% ( 34 % ) of our accounts receivable as of december 28 , 2013 ( 33% ( 33 % ) as of december 29 , 2012 ) . for 2012 compared to 2011 , the $ 2.1 billion decrease in cash provided by operating activities was due to lower net income and changes in our working capital , partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items . the adjustments for noncash items were higher due primarily to higher depreciation in 2012 compared to 2011 , partially offset by increases in non-acquisition-related deferred tax liabilities as of december 31 , 2011 . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; as well as cash used for acquisitions . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily due to an increase in purchases of available-for-sale investments and a decrease in maturities and sales of trading assets , partially offset by an increase in maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments and a decrease in purchases of licensed technology and patents . our capital expenditures were $ 10.7 billion in 2013 ( $ 11.0 billion in 2012 and $ 10.8 billion in 2011 ) . cash used for investing activities increased in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to net purchases of available- for-sale investments and trading assets in 2012 , as compared to net maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments and trading assets in 2011 , partially offset by a decrease in cash paid for acquisitions . net purchases of available-for-sale investments in 2012 included our purchase of $ 3.2 billion of equity securities in asml in q3 2012 . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares through employee equity incentive plans . table of contents management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) .
Question: what was net cash provided by operating activities in 2013?
| 20776.0 |
CONVFINQA4325 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 20776</td><td>$ 18884</td><td>$ 20963</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-18073 ( 18073 )</td><td>-14060 ( 14060 )</td><td>-10301 ( 10301 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash used for financing activities</td><td>-5498 ( 5498 )</td><td>-1408 ( 1408 )</td><td>-11100 ( 11100 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2804 ( 2804 )</td><td>$ 3413</td><td>$ -433 ( 433 )</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in certain assets and liabilities . for 2013 compared to 2012 , the $ 1.9 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income in 2013 . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2013 compared to 2012 were $ 1.1 billion lower due to lower income before taxes in 2013 and 2012 income tax overpayments . changes in assets and liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 , compared to december 29 , 2012 , included lower income taxes payable and receivable resulting from a reduction in taxes due in 2013 , and lower inventories due to the sell-through of older-generation products , partially offset by the ramp of 4th generation intel core processor family products . for 2013 , our three largest customers accounted for 44% ( 44 % ) of our net revenue ( 43% ( 43 % ) in 2012 and 2011 ) , with hewlett- packard company accounting for 17% ( 17 % ) of our net revenue ( 18% ( 18 % ) in 2012 and 19% ( 19 % ) in 2011 ) , dell accounting for 15% ( 15 % ) of our net revenue ( 14% ( 14 % ) in 2012 and 15% ( 15 % ) in 2011 ) , and lenovo accounting for 12% ( 12 % ) of our net revenue ( 11% ( 11 % ) in 2012 and 9% ( 9 % ) in 2011 ) . these three customers accounted for 34% ( 34 % ) of our accounts receivable as of december 28 , 2013 ( 33% ( 33 % ) as of december 29 , 2012 ) . for 2012 compared to 2011 , the $ 2.1 billion decrease in cash provided by operating activities was due to lower net income and changes in our working capital , partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items . the adjustments for noncash items were higher due primarily to higher depreciation in 2012 compared to 2011 , partially offset by increases in non-acquisition-related deferred tax liabilities as of december 31 , 2011 . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; as well as cash used for acquisitions . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily due to an increase in purchases of available-for-sale investments and a decrease in maturities and sales of trading assets , partially offset by an increase in maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments and a decrease in purchases of licensed technology and patents . our capital expenditures were $ 10.7 billion in 2013 ( $ 11.0 billion in 2012 and $ 10.8 billion in 2011 ) . cash used for investing activities increased in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to net purchases of available- for-sale investments and trading assets in 2012 , as compared to net maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments and trading assets in 2011 , partially offset by a decrease in cash paid for acquisitions . net purchases of available-for-sale investments in 2012 included our purchase of $ 3.2 billion of equity securities in asml in q3 2012 . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares through employee equity incentive plans . table of contents management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) .
Question: what was net cash provided by operating activities in 2013?
Answer: 20776.0
Question: what was net cash provided by operating activities in 2012?
| 18884.0 |
CONVFINQA4326 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 20776</td><td>$ 18884</td><td>$ 20963</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-18073 ( 18073 )</td><td>-14060 ( 14060 )</td><td>-10301 ( 10301 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash used for financing activities</td><td>-5498 ( 5498 )</td><td>-1408 ( 1408 )</td><td>-11100 ( 11100 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2804 ( 2804 )</td><td>$ 3413</td><td>$ -433 ( 433 )</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in certain assets and liabilities . for 2013 compared to 2012 , the $ 1.9 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income in 2013 . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2013 compared to 2012 were $ 1.1 billion lower due to lower income before taxes in 2013 and 2012 income tax overpayments . changes in assets and liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 , compared to december 29 , 2012 , included lower income taxes payable and receivable resulting from a reduction in taxes due in 2013 , and lower inventories due to the sell-through of older-generation products , partially offset by the ramp of 4th generation intel core processor family products . for 2013 , our three largest customers accounted for 44% ( 44 % ) of our net revenue ( 43% ( 43 % ) in 2012 and 2011 ) , with hewlett- packard company accounting for 17% ( 17 % ) of our net revenue ( 18% ( 18 % ) in 2012 and 19% ( 19 % ) in 2011 ) , dell accounting for 15% ( 15 % ) of our net revenue ( 14% ( 14 % ) in 2012 and 15% ( 15 % ) in 2011 ) , and lenovo accounting for 12% ( 12 % ) of our net revenue ( 11% ( 11 % ) in 2012 and 9% ( 9 % ) in 2011 ) . these three customers accounted for 34% ( 34 % ) of our accounts receivable as of december 28 , 2013 ( 33% ( 33 % ) as of december 29 , 2012 ) . for 2012 compared to 2011 , the $ 2.1 billion decrease in cash provided by operating activities was due to lower net income and changes in our working capital , partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items . the adjustments for noncash items were higher due primarily to higher depreciation in 2012 compared to 2011 , partially offset by increases in non-acquisition-related deferred tax liabilities as of december 31 , 2011 . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; as well as cash used for acquisitions . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily due to an increase in purchases of available-for-sale investments and a decrease in maturities and sales of trading assets , partially offset by an increase in maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments and a decrease in purchases of licensed technology and patents . our capital expenditures were $ 10.7 billion in 2013 ( $ 11.0 billion in 2012 and $ 10.8 billion in 2011 ) . cash used for investing activities increased in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to net purchases of available- for-sale investments and trading assets in 2012 , as compared to net maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments and trading assets in 2011 , partially offset by a decrease in cash paid for acquisitions . net purchases of available-for-sale investments in 2012 included our purchase of $ 3.2 billion of equity securities in asml in q3 2012 . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares through employee equity incentive plans . table of contents management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) .
Question: what was net cash provided by operating activities in 2013?
Answer: 20776.0
Question: what was net cash provided by operating activities in 2012?
Answer: 18884.0
Question: what was the net change in value?
| 1892.0 |
CONVFINQA4327 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 20776</td><td>$ 18884</td><td>$ 20963</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-18073 ( 18073 )</td><td>-14060 ( 14060 )</td><td>-10301 ( 10301 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash used for financing activities</td><td>-5498 ( 5498 )</td><td>-1408 ( 1408 )</td><td>-11100 ( 11100 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2804 ( 2804 )</td><td>$ 3413</td><td>$ -433 ( 433 )</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in certain assets and liabilities . for 2013 compared to 2012 , the $ 1.9 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income in 2013 . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2013 compared to 2012 were $ 1.1 billion lower due to lower income before taxes in 2013 and 2012 income tax overpayments . changes in assets and liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 , compared to december 29 , 2012 , included lower income taxes payable and receivable resulting from a reduction in taxes due in 2013 , and lower inventories due to the sell-through of older-generation products , partially offset by the ramp of 4th generation intel core processor family products . for 2013 , our three largest customers accounted for 44% ( 44 % ) of our net revenue ( 43% ( 43 % ) in 2012 and 2011 ) , with hewlett- packard company accounting for 17% ( 17 % ) of our net revenue ( 18% ( 18 % ) in 2012 and 19% ( 19 % ) in 2011 ) , dell accounting for 15% ( 15 % ) of our net revenue ( 14% ( 14 % ) in 2012 and 15% ( 15 % ) in 2011 ) , and lenovo accounting for 12% ( 12 % ) of our net revenue ( 11% ( 11 % ) in 2012 and 9% ( 9 % ) in 2011 ) . these three customers accounted for 34% ( 34 % ) of our accounts receivable as of december 28 , 2013 ( 33% ( 33 % ) as of december 29 , 2012 ) . for 2012 compared to 2011 , the $ 2.1 billion decrease in cash provided by operating activities was due to lower net income and changes in our working capital , partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items . the adjustments for noncash items were higher due primarily to higher depreciation in 2012 compared to 2011 , partially offset by increases in non-acquisition-related deferred tax liabilities as of december 31 , 2011 . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; as well as cash used for acquisitions . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily due to an increase in purchases of available-for-sale investments and a decrease in maturities and sales of trading assets , partially offset by an increase in maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments and a decrease in purchases of licensed technology and patents . our capital expenditures were $ 10.7 billion in 2013 ( $ 11.0 billion in 2012 and $ 10.8 billion in 2011 ) . cash used for investing activities increased in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to net purchases of available- for-sale investments and trading assets in 2012 , as compared to net maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments and trading assets in 2011 , partially offset by a decrease in cash paid for acquisitions . net purchases of available-for-sale investments in 2012 included our purchase of $ 3.2 billion of equity securities in asml in q3 2012 . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares through employee equity incentive plans . table of contents management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) .
Question: what was net cash provided by operating activities in 2013?
Answer: 20776.0
Question: what was net cash provided by operating activities in 2012?
Answer: 18884.0
Question: what was the net change in value?
Answer: 1892.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.10019 |
CONVFINQA4328 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
incremental contract start-up costs 2014large municipal contract . during 2018 and 2017 , we incurred costs of $ 5.7 million and $ 8.2 million , respectively , related to the implementation of a large municipal contract . these costs did not meet the capitalization criteria prescribed by the new revenue recognition standard . adoption of the tax act . the tax act was enacted on december 22 , 2017 . among other things , the tax act reduced the u.s . federal corporate tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) . for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , we recorded provisional amounts based on our estimates of the tax act 2019s effect to our deferred taxes , uncertain tax positions , and one-time transition tax . these adjustments reduced our tax provision by $ 463.9 million . during 2018 , we adjusted the provisional amounts recorded as of december 31 , 2017 for the one-time transition tax , deferred taxes and uncertain tax positions . these adjustments increased our tax provision by $ 0.3 million . bridgeton insurance recovery , net . during 2018 , we collected an insurance recovery of $ 40.0 million related to our closed bridgeton landfill in missouri , which we recognized as a reduction of remediation expenses in our cost of operations . in addition , we incurred $ 12.0 million of incremental costs attributable to the bridgeton insurance recovery . recent developments 2019 financial guidance in 2019 , we will continue to focus on managing the controllable aspects of our business by enhancing the quality of our revenue , investing in profitable growth opportunities and reducing costs . our team remains focused on executing our strategy to deliver consistent earnings and free cash flow growth , and improve return on invested capital . we are committed to an efficient capital structure , maintaining our investment grade credit ratings and increasing cash returned to our shareholders . our guidance is based on current economic conditions and does not assume any significant changes in the overall economy in 2019 . specific guidance follows : revenue we expect 2019 revenue to increase by approximately 4.25 to 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) comprised of the following : increase ( decrease ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>increase ( decrease )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average yield</td><td>2.75% ( 2.75 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume</td><td>0.0 to 0.25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>energy services</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fuel recovery fees</td><td>0.25</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>recycling processing and commodity sales</td><td>0.25 to 0.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>acquisitions / divestitures net</td><td>1.0</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total change</td><td>4.25 to 4.75% ( 4.75 % )</td></tr></table> changes in price are restricted on approximately 50% ( 50 % ) of our annual service revenue . the majority of these restricted pricing arrangements are tied to fluctuations in a specific index ( primarily a consumer price index ) as defined in the contract . the consumer price index varies from a single historical stated period of time or an average of trailing historical rates over a stated period of time . in addition , the initial effect of pricing resets typically lags 6 to 12 months from the end of the index measurement period to the date the revised pricing goes into effect . as a result , current changes in a specific index may not manifest themselves in our reported pricing for several quarters into the future. .
Question: what is the ratio of insurance recovery collected to incremental costs attributable to the bridgeton?
| 3.33333 |
CONVFINQA4329 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
incremental contract start-up costs 2014large municipal contract . during 2018 and 2017 , we incurred costs of $ 5.7 million and $ 8.2 million , respectively , related to the implementation of a large municipal contract . these costs did not meet the capitalization criteria prescribed by the new revenue recognition standard . adoption of the tax act . the tax act was enacted on december 22 , 2017 . among other things , the tax act reduced the u.s . federal corporate tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) . for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , we recorded provisional amounts based on our estimates of the tax act 2019s effect to our deferred taxes , uncertain tax positions , and one-time transition tax . these adjustments reduced our tax provision by $ 463.9 million . during 2018 , we adjusted the provisional amounts recorded as of december 31 , 2017 for the one-time transition tax , deferred taxes and uncertain tax positions . these adjustments increased our tax provision by $ 0.3 million . bridgeton insurance recovery , net . during 2018 , we collected an insurance recovery of $ 40.0 million related to our closed bridgeton landfill in missouri , which we recognized as a reduction of remediation expenses in our cost of operations . in addition , we incurred $ 12.0 million of incremental costs attributable to the bridgeton insurance recovery . recent developments 2019 financial guidance in 2019 , we will continue to focus on managing the controllable aspects of our business by enhancing the quality of our revenue , investing in profitable growth opportunities and reducing costs . our team remains focused on executing our strategy to deliver consistent earnings and free cash flow growth , and improve return on invested capital . we are committed to an efficient capital structure , maintaining our investment grade credit ratings and increasing cash returned to our shareholders . our guidance is based on current economic conditions and does not assume any significant changes in the overall economy in 2019 . specific guidance follows : revenue we expect 2019 revenue to increase by approximately 4.25 to 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) comprised of the following : increase ( decrease ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>increase ( decrease )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average yield</td><td>2.75% ( 2.75 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume</td><td>0.0 to 0.25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>energy services</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fuel recovery fees</td><td>0.25</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>recycling processing and commodity sales</td><td>0.25 to 0.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>acquisitions / divestitures net</td><td>1.0</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total change</td><td>4.25 to 4.75% ( 4.75 % )</td></tr></table> changes in price are restricted on approximately 50% ( 50 % ) of our annual service revenue . the majority of these restricted pricing arrangements are tied to fluctuations in a specific index ( primarily a consumer price index ) as defined in the contract . the consumer price index varies from a single historical stated period of time or an average of trailing historical rates over a stated period of time . in addition , the initial effect of pricing resets typically lags 6 to 12 months from the end of the index measurement period to the date the revised pricing goes into effect . as a result , current changes in a specific index may not manifest themselves in our reported pricing for several quarters into the future. .
Question: what is the ratio of insurance recovery collected to incremental costs attributable to the bridgeton?
Answer: 3.33333
Question: what about the ratio of acquisitions / divestitures net to fuel recovery fees in 2009?
| 4.0 |
CONVFINQA4330 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 12 . share repurchases and dividends share repurchases share repurchase activity during the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 follows ( in millions except per share amounts ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>number of shares repurchased</td><td>10.7</td><td>9.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amount paid</td><td>$ 736.9</td><td>$ 610.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average cost per share</td><td>$ 69.06</td><td>$ 63.84</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2018 , there were no repurchased shares pending settlement . in october 2017 , our board of directors added $ 2.0 billion to the existing share repurchase authorization that now extends through december 31 , 2020 . share repurchases under the program may be made through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable federal securities laws . while the board of directors has approved the program , the timing of any purchases , the prices and the number of shares of common stock to be purchased will be determined by our management , at its discretion , and will depend upon market conditions and other factors . the share repurchase program may be extended , suspended or discontinued at any time . as of december 31 , 2018 , the remaining authorized purchase capacity under our october 2017 repurchase program was $ 1.1 billion . dividends in october 2018 , our board of directors approved a quarterly dividend of $ 0.375 per share . cash dividends declared were $ 468.4 million , $ 446.3 million and $ 423.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 , we recorded a quarterly dividend payable of $ 121.0 million to shareholders of record at the close of business on january 2 , 2019 . 13 . earnings per share basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to republic services , inc . by the weighted average number of common shares ( including vested but unissued rsus ) outstanding during the period . diluted earnings per share is based on the combined weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding , which include , where appropriate , the assumed exercise of employee stock options , unvested rsus and unvested psus at the expected attainment levels . we use the treasury stock method in computing diluted earnings per share. .
Question: what was the sum of dividends declared in 2018 and 2017?
| 914.7 |
CONVFINQA4331 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 12 . share repurchases and dividends share repurchases share repurchase activity during the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 follows ( in millions except per share amounts ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>number of shares repurchased</td><td>10.7</td><td>9.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amount paid</td><td>$ 736.9</td><td>$ 610.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average cost per share</td><td>$ 69.06</td><td>$ 63.84</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2018 , there were no repurchased shares pending settlement . in october 2017 , our board of directors added $ 2.0 billion to the existing share repurchase authorization that now extends through december 31 , 2020 . share repurchases under the program may be made through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable federal securities laws . while the board of directors has approved the program , the timing of any purchases , the prices and the number of shares of common stock to be purchased will be determined by our management , at its discretion , and will depend upon market conditions and other factors . the share repurchase program may be extended , suspended or discontinued at any time . as of december 31 , 2018 , the remaining authorized purchase capacity under our october 2017 repurchase program was $ 1.1 billion . dividends in october 2018 , our board of directors approved a quarterly dividend of $ 0.375 per share . cash dividends declared were $ 468.4 million , $ 446.3 million and $ 423.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 , we recorded a quarterly dividend payable of $ 121.0 million to shareholders of record at the close of business on january 2 , 2019 . 13 . earnings per share basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to republic services , inc . by the weighted average number of common shares ( including vested but unissued rsus ) outstanding during the period . diluted earnings per share is based on the combined weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding , which include , where appropriate , the assumed exercise of employee stock options , unvested rsus and unvested psus at the expected attainment levels . we use the treasury stock method in computing diluted earnings per share. .
Question: what was the sum of dividends declared in 2018 and 2017?
Answer: 914.7
Question: what is the total including dividends declared in 2016?
| 1338.5 |
CONVFINQA4332 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2018 emerson annual report | 51 as of september 30 , 2018 , 1874750 shares awarded primarily in 2016 were outstanding , contingent on the company achieving its performance objectives through 2018 . the objectives for these shares were met at the 97 percent level at the end of 2018 and 1818508 shares will be distributed in early 2019 . additionally , the rights to receive a maximum of 2261700 and 2375313 common shares were awarded in 2018 and 2017 , respectively , under the new performance shares program , and are outstanding and contingent upon the company achieving its performance objectives through 2020 and 2019 , respectively . incentive shares plans also include restricted stock awards which involve distribution of common stock to key management employees subject to cliff vesting at the end of service periods ranging from three to ten years . the fair value of restricted stock awards is determined based on the average of the high and low market prices of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant , with compensation expense recognized ratably over the applicable service period . in 2018 , 310000 shares of restricted stock vested as a result of participants fulfilling the applicable service requirements . consequently , 167837 shares were issued while 142163 shares were withheld for income taxes in accordance with minimum withholding requirements . as of september 30 , 2018 , there were 1276200 shares of unvested restricted stock outstanding . the total fair value of shares distributed under incentive shares plans was $ 20 , $ 245 and $ 11 , respectively , in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , of which $ 9 , $ 101 and $ 4 was paid in cash , primarily for tax withholding . as of september 30 , 2018 , 10.3 million shares remained available for award under incentive shares plans . changes in shares outstanding but not yet earned under incentive shares plans during the year ended september 30 , 2018 follow ( shares in thousands ; assumes 100 percent payout of unvested awards ) : average grant date shares fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares</td><td>average grant datefair value per share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>4999</td><td>$ 50.33</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>2295</td><td>$ 63.79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>earned/vested</td><td>-310 ( 310 )</td><td>$ 51.27</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canceled</td><td>-86 ( 86 )</td><td>$ 56.53</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>end of year</td><td>6898</td><td>$ 54.69</td></tr></table> total compensation expense for stock options and incentive shares was $ 216 , $ 115 and $ 159 for 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively , of which $ 5 and $ 14 was included in discontinued operations for 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the increase in expense for 2018 reflects an increase in the company 2019s stock price and progress toward achieving its performance objectives . the decrease in expense for 2017 reflects the impact of changes in the stock price . income tax benefits recognized in the income statement for these compensation arrangements during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 42 , $ 33 and $ 45 , respectively . as of september 30 , 2018 , total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested shares awarded under these plans was $ 182 , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years . in addition to the employee stock option and incentive shares plans , in 2018 the company awarded 12228 shares of restricted stock and 2038 restricted stock units under the restricted stock plan for non-management directors . as of september 30 , 2018 , 159965 shares were available for issuance under this plan . ( 16 ) common and preferred stock at september 30 , 2018 , 37.0 million shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the company 2019s stock-based compensation plans . during 2018 , 15.1 million common shares were purchased and 2.6 million treasury shares were reissued . in 2017 , 6.6 million common shares were purchased and 5.5 million treasury shares were reissued . at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , the company had 5.4 million shares of $ 2.50 par value preferred stock authorized , with none issued. .
Question: what was the sum of restricted stock awarded in 2018?
| 14266.0 |
CONVFINQA4333 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2018 emerson annual report | 51 as of september 30 , 2018 , 1874750 shares awarded primarily in 2016 were outstanding , contingent on the company achieving its performance objectives through 2018 . the objectives for these shares were met at the 97 percent level at the end of 2018 and 1818508 shares will be distributed in early 2019 . additionally , the rights to receive a maximum of 2261700 and 2375313 common shares were awarded in 2018 and 2017 , respectively , under the new performance shares program , and are outstanding and contingent upon the company achieving its performance objectives through 2020 and 2019 , respectively . incentive shares plans also include restricted stock awards which involve distribution of common stock to key management employees subject to cliff vesting at the end of service periods ranging from three to ten years . the fair value of restricted stock awards is determined based on the average of the high and low market prices of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant , with compensation expense recognized ratably over the applicable service period . in 2018 , 310000 shares of restricted stock vested as a result of participants fulfilling the applicable service requirements . consequently , 167837 shares were issued while 142163 shares were withheld for income taxes in accordance with minimum withholding requirements . as of september 30 , 2018 , there were 1276200 shares of unvested restricted stock outstanding . the total fair value of shares distributed under incentive shares plans was $ 20 , $ 245 and $ 11 , respectively , in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , of which $ 9 , $ 101 and $ 4 was paid in cash , primarily for tax withholding . as of september 30 , 2018 , 10.3 million shares remained available for award under incentive shares plans . changes in shares outstanding but not yet earned under incentive shares plans during the year ended september 30 , 2018 follow ( shares in thousands ; assumes 100 percent payout of unvested awards ) : average grant date shares fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares</td><td>average grant datefair value per share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>4999</td><td>$ 50.33</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>2295</td><td>$ 63.79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>earned/vested</td><td>-310 ( 310 )</td><td>$ 51.27</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canceled</td><td>-86 ( 86 )</td><td>$ 56.53</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>end of year</td><td>6898</td><td>$ 54.69</td></tr></table> total compensation expense for stock options and incentive shares was $ 216 , $ 115 and $ 159 for 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively , of which $ 5 and $ 14 was included in discontinued operations for 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the increase in expense for 2018 reflects an increase in the company 2019s stock price and progress toward achieving its performance objectives . the decrease in expense for 2017 reflects the impact of changes in the stock price . income tax benefits recognized in the income statement for these compensation arrangements during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 42 , $ 33 and $ 45 , respectively . as of september 30 , 2018 , total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested shares awarded under these plans was $ 182 , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years . in addition to the employee stock option and incentive shares plans , in 2018 the company awarded 12228 shares of restricted stock and 2038 restricted stock units under the restricted stock plan for non-management directors . as of september 30 , 2018 , 159965 shares were available for issuance under this plan . ( 16 ) common and preferred stock at september 30 , 2018 , 37.0 million shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the company 2019s stock-based compensation plans . during 2018 , 15.1 million common shares were purchased and 2.6 million treasury shares were reissued . in 2017 , 6.6 million common shares were purchased and 5.5 million treasury shares were reissued . at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , the company had 5.4 million shares of $ 2.50 par value preferred stock authorized , with none issued. .
Question: what was the sum of restricted stock awarded in 2018?
Answer: 14266.0
Question: what was the total number of shares available for issuance?
| 159965.0 |
CONVFINQA4334 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2018 emerson annual report | 51 as of september 30 , 2018 , 1874750 shares awarded primarily in 2016 were outstanding , contingent on the company achieving its performance objectives through 2018 . the objectives for these shares were met at the 97 percent level at the end of 2018 and 1818508 shares will be distributed in early 2019 . additionally , the rights to receive a maximum of 2261700 and 2375313 common shares were awarded in 2018 and 2017 , respectively , under the new performance shares program , and are outstanding and contingent upon the company achieving its performance objectives through 2020 and 2019 , respectively . incentive shares plans also include restricted stock awards which involve distribution of common stock to key management employees subject to cliff vesting at the end of service periods ranging from three to ten years . the fair value of restricted stock awards is determined based on the average of the high and low market prices of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant , with compensation expense recognized ratably over the applicable service period . in 2018 , 310000 shares of restricted stock vested as a result of participants fulfilling the applicable service requirements . consequently , 167837 shares were issued while 142163 shares were withheld for income taxes in accordance with minimum withholding requirements . as of september 30 , 2018 , there were 1276200 shares of unvested restricted stock outstanding . the total fair value of shares distributed under incentive shares plans was $ 20 , $ 245 and $ 11 , respectively , in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , of which $ 9 , $ 101 and $ 4 was paid in cash , primarily for tax withholding . as of september 30 , 2018 , 10.3 million shares remained available for award under incentive shares plans . changes in shares outstanding but not yet earned under incentive shares plans during the year ended september 30 , 2018 follow ( shares in thousands ; assumes 100 percent payout of unvested awards ) : average grant date shares fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares</td><td>average grant datefair value per share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>4999</td><td>$ 50.33</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>2295</td><td>$ 63.79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>earned/vested</td><td>-310 ( 310 )</td><td>$ 51.27</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canceled</td><td>-86 ( 86 )</td><td>$ 56.53</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>end of year</td><td>6898</td><td>$ 54.69</td></tr></table> total compensation expense for stock options and incentive shares was $ 216 , $ 115 and $ 159 for 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively , of which $ 5 and $ 14 was included in discontinued operations for 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the increase in expense for 2018 reflects an increase in the company 2019s stock price and progress toward achieving its performance objectives . the decrease in expense for 2017 reflects the impact of changes in the stock price . income tax benefits recognized in the income statement for these compensation arrangements during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 42 , $ 33 and $ 45 , respectively . as of september 30 , 2018 , total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested shares awarded under these plans was $ 182 , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years . in addition to the employee stock option and incentive shares plans , in 2018 the company awarded 12228 shares of restricted stock and 2038 restricted stock units under the restricted stock plan for non-management directors . as of september 30 , 2018 , 159965 shares were available for issuance under this plan . ( 16 ) common and preferred stock at september 30 , 2018 , 37.0 million shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the company 2019s stock-based compensation plans . during 2018 , 15.1 million common shares were purchased and 2.6 million treasury shares were reissued . in 2017 , 6.6 million common shares were purchased and 5.5 million treasury shares were reissued . at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , the company had 5.4 million shares of $ 2.50 par value preferred stock authorized , with none issued. .
Question: what was the sum of restricted stock awarded in 2018?
Answer: 14266.0
Question: what was the total number of shares available for issuance?
Answer: 159965.0
Question: what is the total number of shares available divided by those awarded?
| 11.21302 |
CONVFINQA4335 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
were more than offset by higher raw material and energy costs ( $ 312 million ) , increased market related downtime ( $ 187 million ) and other items ( $ 30 million ) . com- pared with 2003 , higher 2005 earnings in the brazilian papers , u.s . coated papers and u.s . market pulp busi- nesses were offset by lower earnings in the u.s . un- coated papers and the european papers businesses . the printing papers segment took 995000 tons of downtime in 2005 , including 540000 tons of lack-of-order down- time to align production with customer demand . this compared with 525000 tons of downtime in 2004 , of which 65000 tons related to lack-of-orders . printing papers in millions 2005 2004 2003 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 7860</td><td>$ 7670</td><td>$ 7280</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>$ 552</td><td>$ 581</td><td>$ 464</td></tr></table> uncoated papers sales totaled $ 4.8 billion in 2005 compared with $ 5.0 billion in 2004 and 2003 . sales price realizations in the united states averaged 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) higher in 2005 than in 2004 , and 4.6% ( 4.6 % ) higher than 2003 . favorable pricing momentum which began in 2004 carried over into the beginning of 2005 . demand , however , began to weaken across all grades as the year progressed , resulting in lower price realizations in the second and third quarters . however , prices stabilized as the year ended . total shipments for the year were 7.2% ( 7.2 % ) lower than in 2004 and 4.2% ( 4.2 % ) lower than in 2003 . to continue matching our productive capacity with customer demand , the business announced the perma- nent closure of three uncoated freesheet machines and took significant lack-of-order downtime during the period . demand showed some improvement toward the end of the year , bolstered by the introduction our new line of vision innovation paper products ( vip technologiestm ) , with improved brightness and white- ness . mill operations were favorable compared to last year , and the rebuild of the no . 1 machine at the east- over , south carolina mill was completed as planned in the fourth quarter . however , the favorable impacts of improved mill operations and lower overhead costs were more than offset by record high input costs for energy and wood and higher transportation costs compared to 2004 . the earnings decline in 2005 compared with 2003 was principally due to lower shipments , higher down- time and increased costs for wood , energy and trans- portation , partially offset by lower overhead costs and favorable mill operations . average sales price realizations for our european operations remained relatively stable during 2005 , but averaged 1% ( 1 % ) lower than in 2004 , and 6% ( 6 % ) below 2003 levels . sales volumes rose slightly , up 1% ( 1 % ) in 2005 com- pared with 2004 and 5% ( 5 % ) compared to 2003 . earnings were lower than in 2004 , reflecting higher wood and energy costs and a compression of margins due to un- favorable foreign currency exchange movements . earn- ings were also adversely affected by downtime related to the rebuild of three paper machines during the year . coated papers sales in the united states were $ 1.6 bil- lion in 2005 , compared with $ 1.4 billion in 2004 and $ 1.3 billion in 2003 . the business reported an operating profit in 2005 versus a small operating loss in 2004 . the earnings improvement was driven by higher average sales prices and improved mill operations . price realiza- tions in 2005 averaged 13% ( 13 % ) higher than 2004 . higher input costs for raw materials and energy partially offset the benefits from improved prices and operations . sales volumes were about 1% ( 1 % ) lower in 2005 versus 2004 . market pulp sales from our u.s . and european facilities totaled $ 757 million in 2005 compared with $ 661 mil- lion and $ 571 million in 2004 and 2003 , respectively . operating profits in 2005 were up 86% ( 86 % ) from 2004 . an operating loss had been reported in 2003 . higher aver- age prices and sales volumes , lower overhead costs and improved mill operations in 2005 more than offset in- creases in raw material , energy and chemical costs . u.s . softwood and hardwood pulp prices improved through the 2005 first and second quarters , then declined during the third quarter , but recovered somewhat toward year end . softwood pulp prices ended the year about 2% ( 2 % ) lower than 2004 , but were 15% ( 15 % ) higher than 2003 , while hardwood pulp prices ended the year about 15% ( 15 % ) higher than 2004 and 10% ( 10 % ) higher than 2003 . u.s . pulp sales volumes were 12% ( 12 % ) higher than in 2004 and 19% ( 19 % ) higher than in 2003 , reflecting increased global demand . euro- pean pulp volumes increased 15% ( 15 % ) and 2% ( 2 % ) compared with 2004 and 2003 , respectively , while average sales prices increased 4% ( 4 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) compared with 2004 and 2003 , respectively . brazilian paper sales were $ 684 million in 2005 com- pared with $ 592 million in 2004 and $ 540 million in 2003 . sales volumes for uncoated freesheet paper , coated paper and wood chips were down from 2004 , but average price realizations improved for exported un- coated freesheet and coated groundwood paper grades . favorable currency translation , as yearly average real exchange rates versus the u.s . dollar were 17% ( 17 % ) higher in 2005 than in 2004 , positively impacted reported sales in u.s . dollars . average sales prices for domestic un- coated paper declined 4% ( 4 % ) in local currency versus 2004 , while domestic coated paper prices were down 3% ( 3 % ) . operating profits in 2005 were down 9% ( 9 % ) from 2004 , but were up 2% ( 2 % ) from 2003 . earnings in 2005 were neg- atively impacted by a weaker product and geographic sales mix for both uncoated and coated papers , reflecting increased competition and softer demand , particularly in the printing , commercial and editorial market segments. .
Question: what is 5 times 1000?
| 5000.0 |
CONVFINQA4336 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
were more than offset by higher raw material and energy costs ( $ 312 million ) , increased market related downtime ( $ 187 million ) and other items ( $ 30 million ) . com- pared with 2003 , higher 2005 earnings in the brazilian papers , u.s . coated papers and u.s . market pulp busi- nesses were offset by lower earnings in the u.s . un- coated papers and the european papers businesses . the printing papers segment took 995000 tons of downtime in 2005 , including 540000 tons of lack-of-order down- time to align production with customer demand . this compared with 525000 tons of downtime in 2004 , of which 65000 tons related to lack-of-orders . printing papers in millions 2005 2004 2003 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 7860</td><td>$ 7670</td><td>$ 7280</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>$ 552</td><td>$ 581</td><td>$ 464</td></tr></table> uncoated papers sales totaled $ 4.8 billion in 2005 compared with $ 5.0 billion in 2004 and 2003 . sales price realizations in the united states averaged 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) higher in 2005 than in 2004 , and 4.6% ( 4.6 % ) higher than 2003 . favorable pricing momentum which began in 2004 carried over into the beginning of 2005 . demand , however , began to weaken across all grades as the year progressed , resulting in lower price realizations in the second and third quarters . however , prices stabilized as the year ended . total shipments for the year were 7.2% ( 7.2 % ) lower than in 2004 and 4.2% ( 4.2 % ) lower than in 2003 . to continue matching our productive capacity with customer demand , the business announced the perma- nent closure of three uncoated freesheet machines and took significant lack-of-order downtime during the period . demand showed some improvement toward the end of the year , bolstered by the introduction our new line of vision innovation paper products ( vip technologiestm ) , with improved brightness and white- ness . mill operations were favorable compared to last year , and the rebuild of the no . 1 machine at the east- over , south carolina mill was completed as planned in the fourth quarter . however , the favorable impacts of improved mill operations and lower overhead costs were more than offset by record high input costs for energy and wood and higher transportation costs compared to 2004 . the earnings decline in 2005 compared with 2003 was principally due to lower shipments , higher down- time and increased costs for wood , energy and trans- portation , partially offset by lower overhead costs and favorable mill operations . average sales price realizations for our european operations remained relatively stable during 2005 , but averaged 1% ( 1 % ) lower than in 2004 , and 6% ( 6 % ) below 2003 levels . sales volumes rose slightly , up 1% ( 1 % ) in 2005 com- pared with 2004 and 5% ( 5 % ) compared to 2003 . earnings were lower than in 2004 , reflecting higher wood and energy costs and a compression of margins due to un- favorable foreign currency exchange movements . earn- ings were also adversely affected by downtime related to the rebuild of three paper machines during the year . coated papers sales in the united states were $ 1.6 bil- lion in 2005 , compared with $ 1.4 billion in 2004 and $ 1.3 billion in 2003 . the business reported an operating profit in 2005 versus a small operating loss in 2004 . the earnings improvement was driven by higher average sales prices and improved mill operations . price realiza- tions in 2005 averaged 13% ( 13 % ) higher than 2004 . higher input costs for raw materials and energy partially offset the benefits from improved prices and operations . sales volumes were about 1% ( 1 % ) lower in 2005 versus 2004 . market pulp sales from our u.s . and european facilities totaled $ 757 million in 2005 compared with $ 661 mil- lion and $ 571 million in 2004 and 2003 , respectively . operating profits in 2005 were up 86% ( 86 % ) from 2004 . an operating loss had been reported in 2003 . higher aver- age prices and sales volumes , lower overhead costs and improved mill operations in 2005 more than offset in- creases in raw material , energy and chemical costs . u.s . softwood and hardwood pulp prices improved through the 2005 first and second quarters , then declined during the third quarter , but recovered somewhat toward year end . softwood pulp prices ended the year about 2% ( 2 % ) lower than 2004 , but were 15% ( 15 % ) higher than 2003 , while hardwood pulp prices ended the year about 15% ( 15 % ) higher than 2004 and 10% ( 10 % ) higher than 2003 . u.s . pulp sales volumes were 12% ( 12 % ) higher than in 2004 and 19% ( 19 % ) higher than in 2003 , reflecting increased global demand . euro- pean pulp volumes increased 15% ( 15 % ) and 2% ( 2 % ) compared with 2004 and 2003 , respectively , while average sales prices increased 4% ( 4 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) compared with 2004 and 2003 , respectively . brazilian paper sales were $ 684 million in 2005 com- pared with $ 592 million in 2004 and $ 540 million in 2003 . sales volumes for uncoated freesheet paper , coated paper and wood chips were down from 2004 , but average price realizations improved for exported un- coated freesheet and coated groundwood paper grades . favorable currency translation , as yearly average real exchange rates versus the u.s . dollar were 17% ( 17 % ) higher in 2005 than in 2004 , positively impacted reported sales in u.s . dollars . average sales prices for domestic un- coated paper declined 4% ( 4 % ) in local currency versus 2004 , while domestic coated paper prices were down 3% ( 3 % ) . operating profits in 2005 were down 9% ( 9 % ) from 2004 , but were up 2% ( 2 % ) from 2003 . earnings in 2005 were neg- atively impacted by a weaker product and geographic sales mix for both uncoated and coated papers , reflecting increased competition and softer demand , particularly in the printing , commercial and editorial market segments. .
Question: what is 5 times 1000?
Answer: 5000.0
Question: what is that divided 2004 sales?
| 0.65189 |
CONVFINQA4337 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2022 expand client relationships - the overall market we serve continues to gravitate beyond single-application purchases to multi-solution partnerships . as the market dynamics shift , we expect our clients and prospects to rely more on our multidimensional service offerings . our leveraged solutions and processing expertise can produce meaningful value and cost savings for our clients through more efficient operating processes , improved service quality and convenience for our clients' customers . 2022 build global diversification - we continue to deploy resources in global markets where we expect to achieve meaningful scale . revenues by segment the table below summarizes our revenues by reporting segment ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ifs</td><td>$ 4630</td><td>$ 4525</td><td>$ 3809</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gfs</td><td>4138</td><td>4250</td><td>2361</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate and other</td><td>355</td><td>466</td><td>426</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total consolidated revenues</td><td>$ 9123</td><td>$ 9241</td><td>$ 6596</td></tr></table> integrated financial solutions ( "ifs" ) the ifs segment is focused primarily on serving north american regional and community bank and savings institutions for transaction and account processing , payment solutions , channel solutions , digital channels , fraud , risk management and compliance solutions , lending and wealth and retirement solutions , and corporate liquidity , capitalizing on the continuing trend to outsource these solutions . clients in this segment include regional and community banks , credit unions and commercial lenders , as well as government institutions , merchants and other commercial organizations . these markets are primarily served through integrated solutions and characterized by multi-year processing contracts that generate highly recurring revenues . the predictable nature of cash flows generated from this segment provides opportunities for further investments in innovation , integration , information and security , and compliance in a cost-effective manner . our solutions in this segment include : 2022 core processing and ancillary applications . our core processing software applications are designed to run banking processes for our financial institution clients , including deposit and lending systems , customer management , and other central management systems , serving as the system of record for processed activity . our diverse selection of market- focused core systems enables fis to compete effectively in a wide range of markets . we also offer a number of services that are ancillary to the primary applications listed above , including branch automation , back-office support systems and compliance support . 2022 digital solutions , including internet , mobile and ebanking . our comprehensive suite of retail delivery applications enables financial institutions to integrate and streamline customer-facing operations and back-office processes , thereby improving customer interaction across all channels ( e.g. , branch offices , internet , atm , mobile , call centers ) . fis' focus on consumer access has driven significant market innovation in this area , with multi-channel and multi-host solutions and a strategy that provides tight integration of services and a seamless customer experience . fis is a leader in mobile banking solutions and electronic banking enabling clients to manage banking and payments through the internet , mobile devices , accounting software and telephone . our corporate electronic banking solutions provide commercial treasury capabilities including cash management services and multi-bank collection and disbursement services that address the specialized needs of corporate clients . fis systems provide full accounting and reconciliation for such transactions , serving also as the system of record. .
Question: what is the total consolidated revenues in 2017?
| 9123.0 |
CONVFINQA4338 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2022 expand client relationships - the overall market we serve continues to gravitate beyond single-application purchases to multi-solution partnerships . as the market dynamics shift , we expect our clients and prospects to rely more on our multidimensional service offerings . our leveraged solutions and processing expertise can produce meaningful value and cost savings for our clients through more efficient operating processes , improved service quality and convenience for our clients' customers . 2022 build global diversification - we continue to deploy resources in global markets where we expect to achieve meaningful scale . revenues by segment the table below summarizes our revenues by reporting segment ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ifs</td><td>$ 4630</td><td>$ 4525</td><td>$ 3809</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gfs</td><td>4138</td><td>4250</td><td>2361</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate and other</td><td>355</td><td>466</td><td>426</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total consolidated revenues</td><td>$ 9123</td><td>$ 9241</td><td>$ 6596</td></tr></table> integrated financial solutions ( "ifs" ) the ifs segment is focused primarily on serving north american regional and community bank and savings institutions for transaction and account processing , payment solutions , channel solutions , digital channels , fraud , risk management and compliance solutions , lending and wealth and retirement solutions , and corporate liquidity , capitalizing on the continuing trend to outsource these solutions . clients in this segment include regional and community banks , credit unions and commercial lenders , as well as government institutions , merchants and other commercial organizations . these markets are primarily served through integrated solutions and characterized by multi-year processing contracts that generate highly recurring revenues . the predictable nature of cash flows generated from this segment provides opportunities for further investments in innovation , integration , information and security , and compliance in a cost-effective manner . our solutions in this segment include : 2022 core processing and ancillary applications . our core processing software applications are designed to run banking processes for our financial institution clients , including deposit and lending systems , customer management , and other central management systems , serving as the system of record for processed activity . our diverse selection of market- focused core systems enables fis to compete effectively in a wide range of markets . we also offer a number of services that are ancillary to the primary applications listed above , including branch automation , back-office support systems and compliance support . 2022 digital solutions , including internet , mobile and ebanking . our comprehensive suite of retail delivery applications enables financial institutions to integrate and streamline customer-facing operations and back-office processes , thereby improving customer interaction across all channels ( e.g. , branch offices , internet , atm , mobile , call centers ) . fis' focus on consumer access has driven significant market innovation in this area , with multi-channel and multi-host solutions and a strategy that provides tight integration of services and a seamless customer experience . fis is a leader in mobile banking solutions and electronic banking enabling clients to manage banking and payments through the internet , mobile devices , accounting software and telephone . our corporate electronic banking solutions provide commercial treasury capabilities including cash management services and multi-bank collection and disbursement services that address the specialized needs of corporate clients . fis systems provide full accounting and reconciliation for such transactions , serving also as the system of record. .
Question: what is the total consolidated revenues in 2017?
Answer: 9123.0
Question: what about in 2016?
| 9241.0 |
CONVFINQA4339 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2022 expand client relationships - the overall market we serve continues to gravitate beyond single-application purchases to multi-solution partnerships . as the market dynamics shift , we expect our clients and prospects to rely more on our multidimensional service offerings . our leveraged solutions and processing expertise can produce meaningful value and cost savings for our clients through more efficient operating processes , improved service quality and convenience for our clients' customers . 2022 build global diversification - we continue to deploy resources in global markets where we expect to achieve meaningful scale . revenues by segment the table below summarizes our revenues by reporting segment ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ifs</td><td>$ 4630</td><td>$ 4525</td><td>$ 3809</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gfs</td><td>4138</td><td>4250</td><td>2361</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate and other</td><td>355</td><td>466</td><td>426</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total consolidated revenues</td><td>$ 9123</td><td>$ 9241</td><td>$ 6596</td></tr></table> integrated financial solutions ( "ifs" ) the ifs segment is focused primarily on serving north american regional and community bank and savings institutions for transaction and account processing , payment solutions , channel solutions , digital channels , fraud , risk management and compliance solutions , lending and wealth and retirement solutions , and corporate liquidity , capitalizing on the continuing trend to outsource these solutions . clients in this segment include regional and community banks , credit unions and commercial lenders , as well as government institutions , merchants and other commercial organizations . these markets are primarily served through integrated solutions and characterized by multi-year processing contracts that generate highly recurring revenues . the predictable nature of cash flows generated from this segment provides opportunities for further investments in innovation , integration , information and security , and compliance in a cost-effective manner . our solutions in this segment include : 2022 core processing and ancillary applications . our core processing software applications are designed to run banking processes for our financial institution clients , including deposit and lending systems , customer management , and other central management systems , serving as the system of record for processed activity . our diverse selection of market- focused core systems enables fis to compete effectively in a wide range of markets . we also offer a number of services that are ancillary to the primary applications listed above , including branch automation , back-office support systems and compliance support . 2022 digital solutions , including internet , mobile and ebanking . our comprehensive suite of retail delivery applications enables financial institutions to integrate and streamline customer-facing operations and back-office processes , thereby improving customer interaction across all channels ( e.g. , branch offices , internet , atm , mobile , call centers ) . fis' focus on consumer access has driven significant market innovation in this area , with multi-channel and multi-host solutions and a strategy that provides tight integration of services and a seamless customer experience . fis is a leader in mobile banking solutions and electronic banking enabling clients to manage banking and payments through the internet , mobile devices , accounting software and telephone . our corporate electronic banking solutions provide commercial treasury capabilities including cash management services and multi-bank collection and disbursement services that address the specialized needs of corporate clients . fis systems provide full accounting and reconciliation for such transactions , serving also as the system of record. .
Question: what is the total consolidated revenues in 2017?
Answer: 9123.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Answer: 9241.0
Question: what is the change in total consolidated revenues?
| -118.0 |
CONVFINQA4340 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2022 expand client relationships - the overall market we serve continues to gravitate beyond single-application purchases to multi-solution partnerships . as the market dynamics shift , we expect our clients and prospects to rely more on our multidimensional service offerings . our leveraged solutions and processing expertise can produce meaningful value and cost savings for our clients through more efficient operating processes , improved service quality and convenience for our clients' customers . 2022 build global diversification - we continue to deploy resources in global markets where we expect to achieve meaningful scale . revenues by segment the table below summarizes our revenues by reporting segment ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ifs</td><td>$ 4630</td><td>$ 4525</td><td>$ 3809</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gfs</td><td>4138</td><td>4250</td><td>2361</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate and other</td><td>355</td><td>466</td><td>426</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total consolidated revenues</td><td>$ 9123</td><td>$ 9241</td><td>$ 6596</td></tr></table> integrated financial solutions ( "ifs" ) the ifs segment is focused primarily on serving north american regional and community bank and savings institutions for transaction and account processing , payment solutions , channel solutions , digital channels , fraud , risk management and compliance solutions , lending and wealth and retirement solutions , and corporate liquidity , capitalizing on the continuing trend to outsource these solutions . clients in this segment include regional and community banks , credit unions and commercial lenders , as well as government institutions , merchants and other commercial organizations . these markets are primarily served through integrated solutions and characterized by multi-year processing contracts that generate highly recurring revenues . the predictable nature of cash flows generated from this segment provides opportunities for further investments in innovation , integration , information and security , and compliance in a cost-effective manner . our solutions in this segment include : 2022 core processing and ancillary applications . our core processing software applications are designed to run banking processes for our financial institution clients , including deposit and lending systems , customer management , and other central management systems , serving as the system of record for processed activity . our diverse selection of market- focused core systems enables fis to compete effectively in a wide range of markets . we also offer a number of services that are ancillary to the primary applications listed above , including branch automation , back-office support systems and compliance support . 2022 digital solutions , including internet , mobile and ebanking . our comprehensive suite of retail delivery applications enables financial institutions to integrate and streamline customer-facing operations and back-office processes , thereby improving customer interaction across all channels ( e.g. , branch offices , internet , atm , mobile , call centers ) . fis' focus on consumer access has driven significant market innovation in this area , with multi-channel and multi-host solutions and a strategy that provides tight integration of services and a seamless customer experience . fis is a leader in mobile banking solutions and electronic banking enabling clients to manage banking and payments through the internet , mobile devices , accounting software and telephone . our corporate electronic banking solutions provide commercial treasury capabilities including cash management services and multi-bank collection and disbursement services that address the specialized needs of corporate clients . fis systems provide full accounting and reconciliation for such transactions , serving also as the system of record. .
Question: what is the total consolidated revenues in 2017?
Answer: 9123.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Answer: 9241.0
Question: what is the change in total consolidated revenues?
Answer: -118.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| -0.01277 |
CONVFINQA4341 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in the ordinary course of business , based on our evaluations of certain geologic trends and prospective economics , we have allowed certain lease acreage to expire and may allow additional acreage to expire in the future . if production is not established or we take no other action to extend the terms of the leases , licenses , or concessions , undeveloped acreage listed in the table below will expire over the next three years . we plan to continue the terms of many of these licenses and concession areas or retain leases through operational or administrative actions. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>net undeveloped acres expiring 2013</td><td>net undeveloped acres expiring 2014</td><td>net undeveloped acres expiring 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s .</td><td>436</td><td>189</td><td>130</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>canada</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total north america</td><td>436</td><td>189</td><td>130</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>e.g .</td><td>2014</td><td>36</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other africa</td><td>858</td><td>2014</td><td>189</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total africa</td><td>858</td><td>36</td><td>189</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total europe</td><td>2014</td><td>216</td><td>1155</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other international</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>49</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>worldwide</td><td>1294</td><td>441</td><td>1523</td></tr></table> marketing and midstream our e&p segment includes activities related to the marketing and transportation of substantially all of our liquid hydrocarbon and natural gas production . these activities include the transportation of production to market centers , the sale of commodities to third parties and storage of production . we balance our various sales , storage and transportation positions through what we call supply optimization , which can include the purchase of commodities from third parties for resale . supply optimization serves to aggregate volumes in order to satisfy transportation commitments and to achieve flexibility within product types and delivery points . as discussed previously , we currently own and operate gathering systems and other midstream assets in some of our production areas . we are continually evaluating value-added investments in midstream infrastructure or in capacity in third-party systems . delivery commitments we have committed to deliver quantities of crude oil and natural gas to customers under a variety of contracts . as of december 31 , 2012 , those contracts for fixed and determinable amounts relate primarily to eagle ford liquid hydrocarbon production . a minimum of 54 mbbld is to be delivered at variable pricing through mid-2017 under two contracts . our current production rates and proved reserves related to the eagle ford shale are sufficient to meet these commitments , but the contracts also provide for a monetary shortfall penalty or delivery of third-party volumes . oil sands mining segment we hold a 20 percent non-operated interest in the aosp , an oil sands mining and upgrading joint venture located in alberta , canada . the joint venture produces bitumen from oil sands deposits in the athabasca region utilizing mining techniques and upgrades the bitumen to synthetic crude oils and vacuum gas oil . the aosp 2019s mining and extraction assets are located near fort mcmurray , alberta and include the muskeg river and the jackpine mines . gross design capacity of the combined mines is 255000 ( 51000 net to our interest ) barrels of bitumen per day . the aosp base and expansion 1 scotford upgrader is at fort saskatchewan , northeast of edmonton , alberta . as of december 31 , 2012 , we own or have rights to participate in developed and undeveloped leases totaling approximately 216000 gross ( 43000 net ) acres . the underlying developed leases are held for the duration of the project , with royalties payable to the province of alberta . the five year aosp expansion 1 was completed in 2011 . the jackpine mine commenced production under a phased start- up in the third quarter of 2010 and began supplying oil sands ore to the base processing facility in the fourth quarter of 2010 . the upgrader expansion was completed and commenced operations in the second quarter of 2011 . synthetic crude oil sales volumes for 2012 were 47 mbbld and net of royalty production was 41 mbbld . phase one of debottlenecking opportunities was approved in 2011 and is expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2013 . future expansions and additional debottlenecking opportunities remain under review with no formal approvals expected until 2014 . current aosp operations use established processes to mine oil sands deposits from an open-pit mine , extract the bitumen and upgrade it into synthetic crude oils . ore is mined using traditional truck and shovel mining techniques . the mined ore passes through primary crushers to reduce the ore chunks in size and is then sent to rotary breakers where the ore chunks are further reduced to smaller particles . the particles are combined with hot water to create slurry . the slurry moves through the extraction .
Question: worldwide, what is the amount of net expiring acres in 2013?
| 1294.0 |
CONVFINQA4342 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in the ordinary course of business , based on our evaluations of certain geologic trends and prospective economics , we have allowed certain lease acreage to expire and may allow additional acreage to expire in the future . if production is not established or we take no other action to extend the terms of the leases , licenses , or concessions , undeveloped acreage listed in the table below will expire over the next three years . we plan to continue the terms of many of these licenses and concession areas or retain leases through operational or administrative actions. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>net undeveloped acres expiring 2013</td><td>net undeveloped acres expiring 2014</td><td>net undeveloped acres expiring 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s .</td><td>436</td><td>189</td><td>130</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>canada</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total north america</td><td>436</td><td>189</td><td>130</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>e.g .</td><td>2014</td><td>36</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other africa</td><td>858</td><td>2014</td><td>189</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total africa</td><td>858</td><td>36</td><td>189</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total europe</td><td>2014</td><td>216</td><td>1155</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other international</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>49</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>worldwide</td><td>1294</td><td>441</td><td>1523</td></tr></table> marketing and midstream our e&p segment includes activities related to the marketing and transportation of substantially all of our liquid hydrocarbon and natural gas production . these activities include the transportation of production to market centers , the sale of commodities to third parties and storage of production . we balance our various sales , storage and transportation positions through what we call supply optimization , which can include the purchase of commodities from third parties for resale . supply optimization serves to aggregate volumes in order to satisfy transportation commitments and to achieve flexibility within product types and delivery points . as discussed previously , we currently own and operate gathering systems and other midstream assets in some of our production areas . we are continually evaluating value-added investments in midstream infrastructure or in capacity in third-party systems . delivery commitments we have committed to deliver quantities of crude oil and natural gas to customers under a variety of contracts . as of december 31 , 2012 , those contracts for fixed and determinable amounts relate primarily to eagle ford liquid hydrocarbon production . a minimum of 54 mbbld is to be delivered at variable pricing through mid-2017 under two contracts . our current production rates and proved reserves related to the eagle ford shale are sufficient to meet these commitments , but the contracts also provide for a monetary shortfall penalty or delivery of third-party volumes . oil sands mining segment we hold a 20 percent non-operated interest in the aosp , an oil sands mining and upgrading joint venture located in alberta , canada . the joint venture produces bitumen from oil sands deposits in the athabasca region utilizing mining techniques and upgrades the bitumen to synthetic crude oils and vacuum gas oil . the aosp 2019s mining and extraction assets are located near fort mcmurray , alberta and include the muskeg river and the jackpine mines . gross design capacity of the combined mines is 255000 ( 51000 net to our interest ) barrels of bitumen per day . the aosp base and expansion 1 scotford upgrader is at fort saskatchewan , northeast of edmonton , alberta . as of december 31 , 2012 , we own or have rights to participate in developed and undeveloped leases totaling approximately 216000 gross ( 43000 net ) acres . the underlying developed leases are held for the duration of the project , with royalties payable to the province of alberta . the five year aosp expansion 1 was completed in 2011 . the jackpine mine commenced production under a phased start- up in the third quarter of 2010 and began supplying oil sands ore to the base processing facility in the fourth quarter of 2010 . the upgrader expansion was completed and commenced operations in the second quarter of 2011 . synthetic crude oil sales volumes for 2012 were 47 mbbld and net of royalty production was 41 mbbld . phase one of debottlenecking opportunities was approved in 2011 and is expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2013 . future expansions and additional debottlenecking opportunities remain under review with no formal approvals expected until 2014 . current aosp operations use established processes to mine oil sands deposits from an open-pit mine , extract the bitumen and upgrade it into synthetic crude oils . ore is mined using traditional truck and shovel mining techniques . the mined ore passes through primary crushers to reduce the ore chunks in size and is then sent to rotary breakers where the ore chunks are further reduced to smaller particles . the particles are combined with hot water to create slurry . the slurry moves through the extraction .
Question: worldwide, what is the amount of net expiring acres in 2013?
Answer: 1294.0
Question: and the value specifically in the us?
| 436.0 |
CONVFINQA4343 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in the ordinary course of business , based on our evaluations of certain geologic trends and prospective economics , we have allowed certain lease acreage to expire and may allow additional acreage to expire in the future . if production is not established or we take no other action to extend the terms of the leases , licenses , or concessions , undeveloped acreage listed in the table below will expire over the next three years . we plan to continue the terms of many of these licenses and concession areas or retain leases through operational or administrative actions. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>net undeveloped acres expiring 2013</td><td>net undeveloped acres expiring 2014</td><td>net undeveloped acres expiring 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s .</td><td>436</td><td>189</td><td>130</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>canada</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total north america</td><td>436</td><td>189</td><td>130</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>e.g .</td><td>2014</td><td>36</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other africa</td><td>858</td><td>2014</td><td>189</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total africa</td><td>858</td><td>36</td><td>189</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total europe</td><td>2014</td><td>216</td><td>1155</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other international</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>49</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>worldwide</td><td>1294</td><td>441</td><td>1523</td></tr></table> marketing and midstream our e&p segment includes activities related to the marketing and transportation of substantially all of our liquid hydrocarbon and natural gas production . these activities include the transportation of production to market centers , the sale of commodities to third parties and storage of production . we balance our various sales , storage and transportation positions through what we call supply optimization , which can include the purchase of commodities from third parties for resale . supply optimization serves to aggregate volumes in order to satisfy transportation commitments and to achieve flexibility within product types and delivery points . as discussed previously , we currently own and operate gathering systems and other midstream assets in some of our production areas . we are continually evaluating value-added investments in midstream infrastructure or in capacity in third-party systems . delivery commitments we have committed to deliver quantities of crude oil and natural gas to customers under a variety of contracts . as of december 31 , 2012 , those contracts for fixed and determinable amounts relate primarily to eagle ford liquid hydrocarbon production . a minimum of 54 mbbld is to be delivered at variable pricing through mid-2017 under two contracts . our current production rates and proved reserves related to the eagle ford shale are sufficient to meet these commitments , but the contracts also provide for a monetary shortfall penalty or delivery of third-party volumes . oil sands mining segment we hold a 20 percent non-operated interest in the aosp , an oil sands mining and upgrading joint venture located in alberta , canada . the joint venture produces bitumen from oil sands deposits in the athabasca region utilizing mining techniques and upgrades the bitumen to synthetic crude oils and vacuum gas oil . the aosp 2019s mining and extraction assets are located near fort mcmurray , alberta and include the muskeg river and the jackpine mines . gross design capacity of the combined mines is 255000 ( 51000 net to our interest ) barrels of bitumen per day . the aosp base and expansion 1 scotford upgrader is at fort saskatchewan , northeast of edmonton , alberta . as of december 31 , 2012 , we own or have rights to participate in developed and undeveloped leases totaling approximately 216000 gross ( 43000 net ) acres . the underlying developed leases are held for the duration of the project , with royalties payable to the province of alberta . the five year aosp expansion 1 was completed in 2011 . the jackpine mine commenced production under a phased start- up in the third quarter of 2010 and began supplying oil sands ore to the base processing facility in the fourth quarter of 2010 . the upgrader expansion was completed and commenced operations in the second quarter of 2011 . synthetic crude oil sales volumes for 2012 were 47 mbbld and net of royalty production was 41 mbbld . phase one of debottlenecking opportunities was approved in 2011 and is expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2013 . future expansions and additional debottlenecking opportunities remain under review with no formal approvals expected until 2014 . current aosp operations use established processes to mine oil sands deposits from an open-pit mine , extract the bitumen and upgrade it into synthetic crude oils . ore is mined using traditional truck and shovel mining techniques . the mined ore passes through primary crushers to reduce the ore chunks in size and is then sent to rotary breakers where the ore chunks are further reduced to smaller particles . the particles are combined with hot water to create slurry . the slurry moves through the extraction .
Question: worldwide, what is the amount of net expiring acres in 2013?
Answer: 1294.0
Question: and the value specifically in the us?
Answer: 436.0
Question: so how much of the acreage expiring this year is foreign?
| 858.0 |
CONVFINQA4344 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in the ordinary course of business , based on our evaluations of certain geologic trends and prospective economics , we have allowed certain lease acreage to expire and may allow additional acreage to expire in the future . if production is not established or we take no other action to extend the terms of the leases , licenses , or concessions , undeveloped acreage listed in the table below will expire over the next three years . we plan to continue the terms of many of these licenses and concession areas or retain leases through operational or administrative actions. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>net undeveloped acres expiring 2013</td><td>net undeveloped acres expiring 2014</td><td>net undeveloped acres expiring 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s .</td><td>436</td><td>189</td><td>130</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>canada</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total north america</td><td>436</td><td>189</td><td>130</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>e.g .</td><td>2014</td><td>36</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other africa</td><td>858</td><td>2014</td><td>189</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total africa</td><td>858</td><td>36</td><td>189</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total europe</td><td>2014</td><td>216</td><td>1155</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other international</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>49</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>worldwide</td><td>1294</td><td>441</td><td>1523</td></tr></table> marketing and midstream our e&p segment includes activities related to the marketing and transportation of substantially all of our liquid hydrocarbon and natural gas production . these activities include the transportation of production to market centers , the sale of commodities to third parties and storage of production . we balance our various sales , storage and transportation positions through what we call supply optimization , which can include the purchase of commodities from third parties for resale . supply optimization serves to aggregate volumes in order to satisfy transportation commitments and to achieve flexibility within product types and delivery points . as discussed previously , we currently own and operate gathering systems and other midstream assets in some of our production areas . we are continually evaluating value-added investments in midstream infrastructure or in capacity in third-party systems . delivery commitments we have committed to deliver quantities of crude oil and natural gas to customers under a variety of contracts . as of december 31 , 2012 , those contracts for fixed and determinable amounts relate primarily to eagle ford liquid hydrocarbon production . a minimum of 54 mbbld is to be delivered at variable pricing through mid-2017 under two contracts . our current production rates and proved reserves related to the eagle ford shale are sufficient to meet these commitments , but the contracts also provide for a monetary shortfall penalty or delivery of third-party volumes . oil sands mining segment we hold a 20 percent non-operated interest in the aosp , an oil sands mining and upgrading joint venture located in alberta , canada . the joint venture produces bitumen from oil sands deposits in the athabasca region utilizing mining techniques and upgrades the bitumen to synthetic crude oils and vacuum gas oil . the aosp 2019s mining and extraction assets are located near fort mcmurray , alberta and include the muskeg river and the jackpine mines . gross design capacity of the combined mines is 255000 ( 51000 net to our interest ) barrels of bitumen per day . the aosp base and expansion 1 scotford upgrader is at fort saskatchewan , northeast of edmonton , alberta . as of december 31 , 2012 , we own or have rights to participate in developed and undeveloped leases totaling approximately 216000 gross ( 43000 net ) acres . the underlying developed leases are held for the duration of the project , with royalties payable to the province of alberta . the five year aosp expansion 1 was completed in 2011 . the jackpine mine commenced production under a phased start- up in the third quarter of 2010 and began supplying oil sands ore to the base processing facility in the fourth quarter of 2010 . the upgrader expansion was completed and commenced operations in the second quarter of 2011 . synthetic crude oil sales volumes for 2012 were 47 mbbld and net of royalty production was 41 mbbld . phase one of debottlenecking opportunities was approved in 2011 and is expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2013 . future expansions and additional debottlenecking opportunities remain under review with no formal approvals expected until 2014 . current aosp operations use established processes to mine oil sands deposits from an open-pit mine , extract the bitumen and upgrade it into synthetic crude oils . ore is mined using traditional truck and shovel mining techniques . the mined ore passes through primary crushers to reduce the ore chunks in size and is then sent to rotary breakers where the ore chunks are further reduced to smaller particles . the particles are combined with hot water to create slurry . the slurry moves through the extraction .
Question: worldwide, what is the amount of net expiring acres in 2013?
Answer: 1294.0
Question: and the value specifically in the us?
Answer: 436.0
Question: so how much of the acreage expiring this year is foreign?
Answer: 858.0
Question: so what percentage of the net expiring acreage during this time is foreign?
| 0.66306 |
CONVFINQA4345 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy asbestos litigation ( entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy new orleans , and entergy texas ) numerous lawsuits have been filed in federal and state courts primarily in texas and louisiana , primarily by contractor employees who worked in the 1940-1980s timeframe , against entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas , and to a lesser extent the other utility operating companies , as premises owners of power plants , for damages caused by alleged exposure to asbestos . many other defendants are named in these lawsuits as well . currently , there are approximately 500 lawsuits involving approximately 5000 claimants . management believes that adequate provisions have been established to cover any exposure . additionally , negotiations continue with insurers to recover reimbursements . management believes that loss exposure has been and will continue to be handled so that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not be material , in the aggregate , to the financial position or results of operation of the utility operating companies . employment and labor-related proceedings ( entergy corporation , entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy new orleans , entergy texas , and system energy ) the registrant subsidiaries and other entergy subsidiaries are responding to various lawsuits in both state and federal courts and to other labor-related proceedings filed by current and former employees . generally , the amount of damages being sought is not specified in these proceedings . these actions include , but are not limited to , allegations of wrongful employment actions ; wage disputes and other claims under the fair labor standards act or its state counterparts ; claims of race , gender and disability discrimination ; disputes arising under collective bargaining agreements ; unfair labor practice proceedings and other administrative proceedings before the national labor relations board ; claims of retaliation ; and claims for or regarding benefits under various entergy corporation sponsored plans . entergy and the registrant subsidiaries are responding to these suits and proceedings and deny liability to the claimants . employees employees are an integral part of entergy 2019s commitment to serving customers . as of december 31 , 2011 , entergy subsidiaries employed 14682 people . utility: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>entergy arkansas</td><td>1357</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>entergy gulf states louisiana</td><td>805</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>entergy louisiana</td><td>937</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>entergy mississippi</td><td>736</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>entergy new orleans</td><td>342</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>entergy texas</td><td>674</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>system energy</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>entergy operations</td><td>2867</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>entergy services</td><td>3138</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>entergy nuclear operations</td><td>3709</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other subsidiaries</td><td>117</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total entergy</td><td>14682</td></tr></table> approximately 5300 employees are represented by the international brotherhood of electrical workers , the utility workers union of america , the international brotherhood of teamsters , the united government security officers of america , and the international union , security , police , fire professionals of america. .
Question: what is the number of employees at entergy arkansas?
| 1357.0 |
CONVFINQA4346 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy asbestos litigation ( entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy new orleans , and entergy texas ) numerous lawsuits have been filed in federal and state courts primarily in texas and louisiana , primarily by contractor employees who worked in the 1940-1980s timeframe , against entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas , and to a lesser extent the other utility operating companies , as premises owners of power plants , for damages caused by alleged exposure to asbestos . many other defendants are named in these lawsuits as well . currently , there are approximately 500 lawsuits involving approximately 5000 claimants . management believes that adequate provisions have been established to cover any exposure . additionally , negotiations continue with insurers to recover reimbursements . management believes that loss exposure has been and will continue to be handled so that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not be material , in the aggregate , to the financial position or results of operation of the utility operating companies . employment and labor-related proceedings ( entergy corporation , entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy new orleans , entergy texas , and system energy ) the registrant subsidiaries and other entergy subsidiaries are responding to various lawsuits in both state and federal courts and to other labor-related proceedings filed by current and former employees . generally , the amount of damages being sought is not specified in these proceedings . these actions include , but are not limited to , allegations of wrongful employment actions ; wage disputes and other claims under the fair labor standards act or its state counterparts ; claims of race , gender and disability discrimination ; disputes arising under collective bargaining agreements ; unfair labor practice proceedings and other administrative proceedings before the national labor relations board ; claims of retaliation ; and claims for or regarding benefits under various entergy corporation sponsored plans . entergy and the registrant subsidiaries are responding to these suits and proceedings and deny liability to the claimants . employees employees are an integral part of entergy 2019s commitment to serving customers . as of december 31 , 2011 , entergy subsidiaries employed 14682 people . utility: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>entergy arkansas</td><td>1357</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>entergy gulf states louisiana</td><td>805</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>entergy louisiana</td><td>937</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>entergy mississippi</td><td>736</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>entergy new orleans</td><td>342</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>entergy texas</td><td>674</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>system energy</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>entergy operations</td><td>2867</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>entergy services</td><td>3138</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>entergy nuclear operations</td><td>3709</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other subsidiaries</td><td>117</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total entergy</td><td>14682</td></tr></table> approximately 5300 employees are represented by the international brotherhood of electrical workers , the utility workers union of america , the international brotherhood of teamsters , the united government security officers of america , and the international union , security , police , fire professionals of america. .
Question: what is the number of employees at entergy arkansas?
Answer: 1357.0
Question: what about the total number of entergy's employees?
| 14682.0 |
CONVFINQA4347 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy asbestos litigation ( entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy new orleans , and entergy texas ) numerous lawsuits have been filed in federal and state courts primarily in texas and louisiana , primarily by contractor employees who worked in the 1940-1980s timeframe , against entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas , and to a lesser extent the other utility operating companies , as premises owners of power plants , for damages caused by alleged exposure to asbestos . many other defendants are named in these lawsuits as well . currently , there are approximately 500 lawsuits involving approximately 5000 claimants . management believes that adequate provisions have been established to cover any exposure . additionally , negotiations continue with insurers to recover reimbursements . management believes that loss exposure has been and will continue to be handled so that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not be material , in the aggregate , to the financial position or results of operation of the utility operating companies . employment and labor-related proceedings ( entergy corporation , entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy new orleans , entergy texas , and system energy ) the registrant subsidiaries and other entergy subsidiaries are responding to various lawsuits in both state and federal courts and to other labor-related proceedings filed by current and former employees . generally , the amount of damages being sought is not specified in these proceedings . these actions include , but are not limited to , allegations of wrongful employment actions ; wage disputes and other claims under the fair labor standards act or its state counterparts ; claims of race , gender and disability discrimination ; disputes arising under collective bargaining agreements ; unfair labor practice proceedings and other administrative proceedings before the national labor relations board ; claims of retaliation ; and claims for or regarding benefits under various entergy corporation sponsored plans . entergy and the registrant subsidiaries are responding to these suits and proceedings and deny liability to the claimants . employees employees are an integral part of entergy 2019s commitment to serving customers . as of december 31 , 2011 , entergy subsidiaries employed 14682 people . utility: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>entergy arkansas</td><td>1357</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>entergy gulf states louisiana</td><td>805</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>entergy louisiana</td><td>937</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>entergy mississippi</td><td>736</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>entergy new orleans</td><td>342</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>entergy texas</td><td>674</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>system energy</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>entergy operations</td><td>2867</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>entergy services</td><td>3138</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>entergy nuclear operations</td><td>3709</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other subsidiaries</td><td>117</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total entergy</td><td>14682</td></tr></table> approximately 5300 employees are represented by the international brotherhood of electrical workers , the utility workers union of america , the international brotherhood of teamsters , the united government security officers of america , and the international union , security , police , fire professionals of america. .
Question: what is the number of employees at entergy arkansas?
Answer: 1357.0
Question: what about the total number of entergy's employees?
Answer: 14682.0
Question: what portion does this represent?
| 0.09243 |
CONVFINQA4348 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy asbestos litigation ( entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy new orleans , and entergy texas ) numerous lawsuits have been filed in federal and state courts primarily in texas and louisiana , primarily by contractor employees who worked in the 1940-1980s timeframe , against entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas , and to a lesser extent the other utility operating companies , as premises owners of power plants , for damages caused by alleged exposure to asbestos . many other defendants are named in these lawsuits as well . currently , there are approximately 500 lawsuits involving approximately 5000 claimants . management believes that adequate provisions have been established to cover any exposure . additionally , negotiations continue with insurers to recover reimbursements . management believes that loss exposure has been and will continue to be handled so that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not be material , in the aggregate , to the financial position or results of operation of the utility operating companies . employment and labor-related proceedings ( entergy corporation , entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy new orleans , entergy texas , and system energy ) the registrant subsidiaries and other entergy subsidiaries are responding to various lawsuits in both state and federal courts and to other labor-related proceedings filed by current and former employees . generally , the amount of damages being sought is not specified in these proceedings . these actions include , but are not limited to , allegations of wrongful employment actions ; wage disputes and other claims under the fair labor standards act or its state counterparts ; claims of race , gender and disability discrimination ; disputes arising under collective bargaining agreements ; unfair labor practice proceedings and other administrative proceedings before the national labor relations board ; claims of retaliation ; and claims for or regarding benefits under various entergy corporation sponsored plans . entergy and the registrant subsidiaries are responding to these suits and proceedings and deny liability to the claimants . employees employees are an integral part of entergy 2019s commitment to serving customers . as of december 31 , 2011 , entergy subsidiaries employed 14682 people . utility: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>entergy arkansas</td><td>1357</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>entergy gulf states louisiana</td><td>805</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>entergy louisiana</td><td>937</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>entergy mississippi</td><td>736</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>entergy new orleans</td><td>342</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>entergy texas</td><td>674</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>system energy</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>entergy operations</td><td>2867</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>entergy services</td><td>3138</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>entergy nuclear operations</td><td>3709</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other subsidiaries</td><td>117</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total entergy</td><td>14682</td></tr></table> approximately 5300 employees are represented by the international brotherhood of electrical workers , the utility workers union of america , the international brotherhood of teamsters , the united government security officers of america , and the international union , security , police , fire professionals of america. .
Question: what is the number of employees at entergy arkansas?
Answer: 1357.0
Question: what about the total number of entergy's employees?
Answer: 14682.0
Question: what portion does this represent?
Answer: 0.09243
Question: what about the number of employees at entergy texas?
| 674.0 |
CONVFINQA4349 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy asbestos litigation ( entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy new orleans , and entergy texas ) numerous lawsuits have been filed in federal and state courts primarily in texas and louisiana , primarily by contractor employees who worked in the 1940-1980s timeframe , against entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas , and to a lesser extent the other utility operating companies , as premises owners of power plants , for damages caused by alleged exposure to asbestos . many other defendants are named in these lawsuits as well . currently , there are approximately 500 lawsuits involving approximately 5000 claimants . management believes that adequate provisions have been established to cover any exposure . additionally , negotiations continue with insurers to recover reimbursements . management believes that loss exposure has been and will continue to be handled so that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not be material , in the aggregate , to the financial position or results of operation of the utility operating companies . employment and labor-related proceedings ( entergy corporation , entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy new orleans , entergy texas , and system energy ) the registrant subsidiaries and other entergy subsidiaries are responding to various lawsuits in both state and federal courts and to other labor-related proceedings filed by current and former employees . generally , the amount of damages being sought is not specified in these proceedings . these actions include , but are not limited to , allegations of wrongful employment actions ; wage disputes and other claims under the fair labor standards act or its state counterparts ; claims of race , gender and disability discrimination ; disputes arising under collective bargaining agreements ; unfair labor practice proceedings and other administrative proceedings before the national labor relations board ; claims of retaliation ; and claims for or regarding benefits under various entergy corporation sponsored plans . entergy and the registrant subsidiaries are responding to these suits and proceedings and deny liability to the claimants . employees employees are an integral part of entergy 2019s commitment to serving customers . as of december 31 , 2011 , entergy subsidiaries employed 14682 people . utility: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>entergy arkansas</td><td>1357</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>entergy gulf states louisiana</td><td>805</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>entergy louisiana</td><td>937</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>entergy mississippi</td><td>736</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>entergy new orleans</td><td>342</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>entergy texas</td><td>674</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>system energy</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>entergy operations</td><td>2867</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>entergy services</td><td>3138</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>entergy nuclear operations</td><td>3709</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other subsidiaries</td><td>117</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total entergy</td><td>14682</td></tr></table> approximately 5300 employees are represented by the international brotherhood of electrical workers , the utility workers union of america , the international brotherhood of teamsters , the united government security officers of america , and the international union , security , police , fire professionals of america. .
Question: what is the number of employees at entergy arkansas?
Answer: 1357.0
Question: what about the total number of entergy's employees?
Answer: 14682.0
Question: what portion does this represent?
Answer: 0.09243
Question: what about the number of employees at entergy texas?
Answer: 674.0
Question: what portion of total employees is at entergy texas?
| 0.04591 |
CONVFINQA4350 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2002 net revenue</td><td>$ 1130.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>17.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fuel write-offs in 2002</td><td>15.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>10.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>base rate decreases</td><td>-23.3 ( 23.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>nisco gain recognized in 2002</td><td>-15.2 ( 15.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>rate refund provisions</td><td>-11.3 ( 11.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>-14.1 ( 14.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 1110.1</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance was due to higher electric sales volume in the service territory . billed usage increased a total of 517 gwh in the residential and commercial sectors . the increase was partially offset by a decrease in industrial usage of 470 gwh due to the loss of two large industrial customers to cogeneration . the customers accounted for approximately 1% ( 1 % ) of entergy gulf states' net revenue in 2002 . in 2002 , deferred fuel costs of $ 8.9 million related to a texas fuel reconciliation case were written off and $ 6.5 million in expense resulted from an adjustment in the deregulated asset plan percentage as the result of a power uprate at river bend . the increase in net wholesale revenue was primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co- op customers and also to affiliated systems related to entergy's generation resource planning . the base rate decreases were effective june 2002 and january 2003 , both in the louisiana jurisdiction . the january 2003 base rate decrease of $ 22.1 million had a minimal impact on net income due to a corresponding reduction in nuclear depreciation and decommissioning expenses associated with the change in accounting to reflect an assumed extension of river bend's useful life . in 2002 , a gain of $ 15.2 million was recognized for the louisiana portion of the 1988 nelson units 1 and 2 sale . entergy gulf states received approval from the lpsc to discontinue applying amortization of the gain against recoverable fuel , resulting in the recognition of the deferred gain in income . rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2003 compared to 2002 for potential rate actions and refunds . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 440.2 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions . fuel and purchased power expenses increased $ 471.1 million due to an increase in the market prices of natural gas and purchased power . other income statement variances 2004 compared to 2003 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : 2022 voluntary severance program accruals of $ 22.5 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in nuclear material and labor costs due to reduced staff in 2004. .
Question: what is the change in net revenue for entergy gulf states , inc from 2002 to 2003?
| -20.6 |
CONVFINQA4351 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2002 net revenue</td><td>$ 1130.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>17.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fuel write-offs in 2002</td><td>15.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>10.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>base rate decreases</td><td>-23.3 ( 23.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>nisco gain recognized in 2002</td><td>-15.2 ( 15.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>rate refund provisions</td><td>-11.3 ( 11.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>-14.1 ( 14.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 1110.1</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance was due to higher electric sales volume in the service territory . billed usage increased a total of 517 gwh in the residential and commercial sectors . the increase was partially offset by a decrease in industrial usage of 470 gwh due to the loss of two large industrial customers to cogeneration . the customers accounted for approximately 1% ( 1 % ) of entergy gulf states' net revenue in 2002 . in 2002 , deferred fuel costs of $ 8.9 million related to a texas fuel reconciliation case were written off and $ 6.5 million in expense resulted from an adjustment in the deregulated asset plan percentage as the result of a power uprate at river bend . the increase in net wholesale revenue was primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co- op customers and also to affiliated systems related to entergy's generation resource planning . the base rate decreases were effective june 2002 and january 2003 , both in the louisiana jurisdiction . the january 2003 base rate decrease of $ 22.1 million had a minimal impact on net income due to a corresponding reduction in nuclear depreciation and decommissioning expenses associated with the change in accounting to reflect an assumed extension of river bend's useful life . in 2002 , a gain of $ 15.2 million was recognized for the louisiana portion of the 1988 nelson units 1 and 2 sale . entergy gulf states received approval from the lpsc to discontinue applying amortization of the gain against recoverable fuel , resulting in the recognition of the deferred gain in income . rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2003 compared to 2002 for potential rate actions and refunds . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 440.2 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions . fuel and purchased power expenses increased $ 471.1 million due to an increase in the market prices of natural gas and purchased power . other income statement variances 2004 compared to 2003 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : 2022 voluntary severance program accruals of $ 22.5 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in nuclear material and labor costs due to reduced staff in 2004. .
Question: what is the change in net revenue for entergy gulf states , inc from 2002 to 2003?
Answer: -20.6
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
| -0.01822 |
CONVFINQA4352 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the third quarter ended 30 june 2017 , we recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $ 145.3 and an intangible asset impairment charge of $ 16.8 associated with our lasa reporting unit . refer to note 11 , goodwill , and note 12 , intangible assets , for more information related to these charges and the associated fair value measurement methods and significant inputs/assumptions , which were classified as level 3 since unobservable inputs were utilized in the fair value measurements . 16 . debt the tables below summarize our outstanding debt at 30 september 2019 and 2018 : total debt . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>30 september</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 58.2</td><td>$ 54.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current portion of long-term debt ( a ) ( b )</td><td>40.4</td><td>406.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>2907.3</td><td>2967.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt 2013 related party ( b )</td><td>320.1</td><td>384.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 3326.0</td><td>$ 3812.6</td></tr></table> ( a ) fiscal year 2019 includes the current portion of long-term debt owed to a related party of $ 37.8 . ( b ) refer to note 7 , acquisitions , for additional information regarding related party debt . short-term borrowings short-term borrowings consisted of bank obligations of $ 58.2 and $ 54.3 at 30 september 2019 and 2018 , respectively . the weighted average interest rate of short-term borrowings outstanding at 30 september 2019 and 2018 was 3.7% ( 3.7 % ) and 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) , respectively. .
Question: in the year of 2019, what percentage of the total debt was short-term debt?
| 0.0175 |
CONVFINQA4353 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the third quarter ended 30 june 2017 , we recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $ 145.3 and an intangible asset impairment charge of $ 16.8 associated with our lasa reporting unit . refer to note 11 , goodwill , and note 12 , intangible assets , for more information related to these charges and the associated fair value measurement methods and significant inputs/assumptions , which were classified as level 3 since unobservable inputs were utilized in the fair value measurements . 16 . debt the tables below summarize our outstanding debt at 30 september 2019 and 2018 : total debt . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>30 september</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 58.2</td><td>$ 54.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current portion of long-term debt ( a ) ( b )</td><td>40.4</td><td>406.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>2907.3</td><td>2967.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt 2013 related party ( b )</td><td>320.1</td><td>384.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 3326.0</td><td>$ 3812.6</td></tr></table> ( a ) fiscal year 2019 includes the current portion of long-term debt owed to a related party of $ 37.8 . ( b ) refer to note 7 , acquisitions , for additional information regarding related party debt . short-term borrowings short-term borrowings consisted of bank obligations of $ 58.2 and $ 54.3 at 30 september 2019 and 2018 , respectively . the weighted average interest rate of short-term borrowings outstanding at 30 september 2019 and 2018 was 3.7% ( 3.7 % ) and 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) , respectively. .
Question: in the year of 2019, what percentage of the total debt was short-term debt?
Answer: 0.0175
Question: in that same year, what was the total of long-term debt?
| 3227.4 |
CONVFINQA4354 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the third quarter ended 30 june 2017 , we recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $ 145.3 and an intangible asset impairment charge of $ 16.8 associated with our lasa reporting unit . refer to note 11 , goodwill , and note 12 , intangible assets , for more information related to these charges and the associated fair value measurement methods and significant inputs/assumptions , which were classified as level 3 since unobservable inputs were utilized in the fair value measurements . 16 . debt the tables below summarize our outstanding debt at 30 september 2019 and 2018 : total debt . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>30 september</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 58.2</td><td>$ 54.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current portion of long-term debt ( a ) ( b )</td><td>40.4</td><td>406.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>2907.3</td><td>2967.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt 2013 related party ( b )</td><td>320.1</td><td>384.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 3326.0</td><td>$ 3812.6</td></tr></table> ( a ) fiscal year 2019 includes the current portion of long-term debt owed to a related party of $ 37.8 . ( b ) refer to note 7 , acquisitions , for additional information regarding related party debt . short-term borrowings short-term borrowings consisted of bank obligations of $ 58.2 and $ 54.3 at 30 september 2019 and 2018 , respectively . the weighted average interest rate of short-term borrowings outstanding at 30 september 2019 and 2018 was 3.7% ( 3.7 % ) and 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) , respectively. .
Question: in the year of 2019, what percentage of the total debt was short-term debt?
Answer: 0.0175
Question: in that same year, what was the total of long-term debt?
Answer: 3227.4
Question: and what was that short-term debt as a percent of this total?
| 0.01803 |
CONVFINQA4355 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( 2 ) in 2013 , our principal u.k subsidiary agreed with the trustees of one of the u.k . plans to contribute an average of $ 11 million per year to that pension plan for the next three years . the trustees of the plan have certain rights to request that our u.k . subsidiary advance an amount equal to an actuarially determined winding-up deficit . as of december 31 , 2015 , the estimated winding-up deficit was a3240 million ( $ 360 million at december 31 , 2015 exchange rates ) . the trustees of the plan have accepted in practice the agreed-upon schedule of contributions detailed above and have not requested the winding-up deficit be paid . ( 3 ) purchase obligations are defined as agreements to purchase goods and services that are enforceable and legally binding on us , and that specifies all significant terms , including what is to be purchased , at what price and the approximate timing of the transaction . most of our purchase obligations are related to purchases of information technology services or other service contracts . ( 4 ) excludes $ 12 million of unfunded commitments related to an investment in a limited partnership due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when the limited partnership will request funding . ( 5 ) excludes $ 218 million of liabilities for uncertain tax positions due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when potential cash settlements will be made . financial condition at december 31 , 2015 , our net assets were $ 6.2 billion , representing total assets minus total liabilities , a decrease from $ 6.6 billion at december 31 , 2014 . the decrease was due primarily to share repurchases of $ 1.6 billion , dividends of $ 323 million , and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 289 million related primarily to an increase in the post- retirement benefit obligation , partially offset by net income of $ 1.4 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2015 . working capital increased by $ 77 million from $ 809 million at december 31 , 2014 to $ 886 million at december 31 , 2015 . accumulated other comprehensive loss increased $ 289 million at december 31 , 2015 as compared to december 31 , 2014 , which was primarily driven by the following : 2022 negative net foreign currency translation adjustments of $ 436 million , which are attributable to the strengthening of the u.s . dollar against certain foreign currencies , 2022 a decrease of $ 155 million in net post-retirement benefit obligations , and 2022 net financial instrument losses of $ 8 million . review by segment general we serve clients through the following segments : 2022 risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through our global distribution network . 2022 hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies . risk solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 7426</td><td>$ 7834</td><td>$ 7789</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1506</td><td>1648</td><td>1540</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>20.3% ( 20.3 % )</td><td>21.0% ( 21.0 % )</td><td>19.8% ( 19.8 % )</td></tr></table> the demand for property and casualty insurance generally rises as the overall level of economic activity increases and generally falls as such activity decreases , affecting both the commissions and fees generated by our brokerage business . the economic activity that impacts property and casualty insurance is described as exposure units , and is most closely correlated .
Question: what is the net income in 2015, in billions?
| 1.4 |
CONVFINQA4356 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( 2 ) in 2013 , our principal u.k subsidiary agreed with the trustees of one of the u.k . plans to contribute an average of $ 11 million per year to that pension plan for the next three years . the trustees of the plan have certain rights to request that our u.k . subsidiary advance an amount equal to an actuarially determined winding-up deficit . as of december 31 , 2015 , the estimated winding-up deficit was a3240 million ( $ 360 million at december 31 , 2015 exchange rates ) . the trustees of the plan have accepted in practice the agreed-upon schedule of contributions detailed above and have not requested the winding-up deficit be paid . ( 3 ) purchase obligations are defined as agreements to purchase goods and services that are enforceable and legally binding on us , and that specifies all significant terms , including what is to be purchased , at what price and the approximate timing of the transaction . most of our purchase obligations are related to purchases of information technology services or other service contracts . ( 4 ) excludes $ 12 million of unfunded commitments related to an investment in a limited partnership due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when the limited partnership will request funding . ( 5 ) excludes $ 218 million of liabilities for uncertain tax positions due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when potential cash settlements will be made . financial condition at december 31 , 2015 , our net assets were $ 6.2 billion , representing total assets minus total liabilities , a decrease from $ 6.6 billion at december 31 , 2014 . the decrease was due primarily to share repurchases of $ 1.6 billion , dividends of $ 323 million , and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 289 million related primarily to an increase in the post- retirement benefit obligation , partially offset by net income of $ 1.4 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2015 . working capital increased by $ 77 million from $ 809 million at december 31 , 2014 to $ 886 million at december 31 , 2015 . accumulated other comprehensive loss increased $ 289 million at december 31 , 2015 as compared to december 31 , 2014 , which was primarily driven by the following : 2022 negative net foreign currency translation adjustments of $ 436 million , which are attributable to the strengthening of the u.s . dollar against certain foreign currencies , 2022 a decrease of $ 155 million in net post-retirement benefit obligations , and 2022 net financial instrument losses of $ 8 million . review by segment general we serve clients through the following segments : 2022 risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through our global distribution network . 2022 hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies . risk solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 7426</td><td>$ 7834</td><td>$ 7789</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1506</td><td>1648</td><td>1540</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>20.3% ( 20.3 % )</td><td>21.0% ( 21.0 % )</td><td>19.8% ( 19.8 % )</td></tr></table> the demand for property and casualty insurance generally rises as the overall level of economic activity increases and generally falls as such activity decreases , affecting both the commissions and fees generated by our brokerage business . the economic activity that impacts property and casualty insurance is described as exposure units , and is most closely correlated .
Question: what is the net income in 2015, in billions?
Answer: 1.4
Question: what about in millions?
| 1400.0 |
CONVFINQA4357 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( 2 ) in 2013 , our principal u.k subsidiary agreed with the trustees of one of the u.k . plans to contribute an average of $ 11 million per year to that pension plan for the next three years . the trustees of the plan have certain rights to request that our u.k . subsidiary advance an amount equal to an actuarially determined winding-up deficit . as of december 31 , 2015 , the estimated winding-up deficit was a3240 million ( $ 360 million at december 31 , 2015 exchange rates ) . the trustees of the plan have accepted in practice the agreed-upon schedule of contributions detailed above and have not requested the winding-up deficit be paid . ( 3 ) purchase obligations are defined as agreements to purchase goods and services that are enforceable and legally binding on us , and that specifies all significant terms , including what is to be purchased , at what price and the approximate timing of the transaction . most of our purchase obligations are related to purchases of information technology services or other service contracts . ( 4 ) excludes $ 12 million of unfunded commitments related to an investment in a limited partnership due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when the limited partnership will request funding . ( 5 ) excludes $ 218 million of liabilities for uncertain tax positions due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when potential cash settlements will be made . financial condition at december 31 , 2015 , our net assets were $ 6.2 billion , representing total assets minus total liabilities , a decrease from $ 6.6 billion at december 31 , 2014 . the decrease was due primarily to share repurchases of $ 1.6 billion , dividends of $ 323 million , and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 289 million related primarily to an increase in the post- retirement benefit obligation , partially offset by net income of $ 1.4 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2015 . working capital increased by $ 77 million from $ 809 million at december 31 , 2014 to $ 886 million at december 31 , 2015 . accumulated other comprehensive loss increased $ 289 million at december 31 , 2015 as compared to december 31 , 2014 , which was primarily driven by the following : 2022 negative net foreign currency translation adjustments of $ 436 million , which are attributable to the strengthening of the u.s . dollar against certain foreign currencies , 2022 a decrease of $ 155 million in net post-retirement benefit obligations , and 2022 net financial instrument losses of $ 8 million . review by segment general we serve clients through the following segments : 2022 risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through our global distribution network . 2022 hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies . risk solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 7426</td><td>$ 7834</td><td>$ 7789</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1506</td><td>1648</td><td>1540</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>20.3% ( 20.3 % )</td><td>21.0% ( 21.0 % )</td><td>19.8% ( 19.8 % )</td></tr></table> the demand for property and casualty insurance generally rises as the overall level of economic activity increases and generally falls as such activity decreases , affecting both the commissions and fees generated by our brokerage business . the economic activity that impacts property and casualty insurance is described as exposure units , and is most closely correlated .
Question: what is the net income in 2015, in billions?
Answer: 1.4
Question: what about in millions?
Answer: 1400.0
Question: what is the total revenue in 2015, in millions?
| 7426.0 |
CONVFINQA4358 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( 2 ) in 2013 , our principal u.k subsidiary agreed with the trustees of one of the u.k . plans to contribute an average of $ 11 million per year to that pension plan for the next three years . the trustees of the plan have certain rights to request that our u.k . subsidiary advance an amount equal to an actuarially determined winding-up deficit . as of december 31 , 2015 , the estimated winding-up deficit was a3240 million ( $ 360 million at december 31 , 2015 exchange rates ) . the trustees of the plan have accepted in practice the agreed-upon schedule of contributions detailed above and have not requested the winding-up deficit be paid . ( 3 ) purchase obligations are defined as agreements to purchase goods and services that are enforceable and legally binding on us , and that specifies all significant terms , including what is to be purchased , at what price and the approximate timing of the transaction . most of our purchase obligations are related to purchases of information technology services or other service contracts . ( 4 ) excludes $ 12 million of unfunded commitments related to an investment in a limited partnership due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when the limited partnership will request funding . ( 5 ) excludes $ 218 million of liabilities for uncertain tax positions due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when potential cash settlements will be made . financial condition at december 31 , 2015 , our net assets were $ 6.2 billion , representing total assets minus total liabilities , a decrease from $ 6.6 billion at december 31 , 2014 . the decrease was due primarily to share repurchases of $ 1.6 billion , dividends of $ 323 million , and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 289 million related primarily to an increase in the post- retirement benefit obligation , partially offset by net income of $ 1.4 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2015 . working capital increased by $ 77 million from $ 809 million at december 31 , 2014 to $ 886 million at december 31 , 2015 . accumulated other comprehensive loss increased $ 289 million at december 31 , 2015 as compared to december 31 , 2014 , which was primarily driven by the following : 2022 negative net foreign currency translation adjustments of $ 436 million , which are attributable to the strengthening of the u.s . dollar against certain foreign currencies , 2022 a decrease of $ 155 million in net post-retirement benefit obligations , and 2022 net financial instrument losses of $ 8 million . review by segment general we serve clients through the following segments : 2022 risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through our global distribution network . 2022 hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies . risk solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 7426</td><td>$ 7834</td><td>$ 7789</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1506</td><td>1648</td><td>1540</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>20.3% ( 20.3 % )</td><td>21.0% ( 21.0 % )</td><td>19.8% ( 19.8 % )</td></tr></table> the demand for property and casualty insurance generally rises as the overall level of economic activity increases and generally falls as such activity decreases , affecting both the commissions and fees generated by our brokerage business . the economic activity that impacts property and casualty insurance is described as exposure units , and is most closely correlated .
Question: what is the net income in 2015, in billions?
Answer: 1.4
Question: what about in millions?
Answer: 1400.0
Question: what is the total revenue in 2015, in millions?
Answer: 7426.0
Question: what profit margin does this represent?
| 0.18853 |
CONVFINQA4359 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis 130 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report wholesale credit portfolio the wholesale credit environment remained favorable throughout 2013 driving an increase in commercial client activity . discipline in underwriting across all areas of lending continues to remain a key point of focus , consistent with evolving market conditions and the firm 2019s risk management activities . the wholesale portfolio is actively managed , in part by conducting ongoing , in-depth reviews of credit quality and of industry , product and client concentrations . during the year , wholesale criticized assets and nonperforming assets decreased from higher levels experienced in 2012 , including a reduction in nonaccrual loans by 39% ( 39 % ) . as of december 31 , 2013 , wholesale exposure ( primarily cib , cb and am ) increased by $ 13.7 billion from december 31 , 2012 , primarily driven by increases of $ 11.4 billion in lending-related commitments and $ 8.4 billion in loans reflecting increased client activity primarily in cb and am . these increases were partially offset by a $ 9.2 billion decrease in derivative receivables . derivative receivables decreased predominantly due to reductions in interest rate derivatives driven by an increase in interest rates and reductions in commodity derivatives due to market movements . the decreases were partially offset by an increase in equity derivatives driven by a rise in equity markets . wholesale credit portfolio december 31 , credit exposure nonperforming ( d ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 , ( in millions )</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loans retained</td><td>$ 308263</td><td>$ 306222</td><td>$ 821</td><td>$ 1434</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loans held-for-sale</td><td>11290</td><td>4406</td><td>26</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loans at fair value ( a )</td><td>2011</td><td>2555</td><td>197</td><td>265</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loans 2013 reported</td><td>321564</td><td>313183</td><td>1044</td><td>1717</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>derivative receivables</td><td>65759</td><td>74983</td><td>415</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>receivables from customers and other ( b )</td><td>26744</td><td>23648</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total wholesale credit-related assets</td><td>414067</td><td>411814</td><td>1459</td><td>1956</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>lending-related commitments</td><td>446232</td><td>434814</td><td>206</td><td>355</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total wholesale credit exposure</td><td>$ 860299</td><td>$ 846628</td><td>$ 1665</td><td>$ 2311</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>credit portfolio management derivatives notional net ( c )</td><td>$ -27996 ( 27996 )</td><td>$ -27447 ( 27447 )</td><td>$ -5 ( 5 )</td><td>$ -25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives</td><td>-14435 ( 14435 )</td><td>-15201 ( 15201 )</td><td>na</td><td>na</td></tr></table> receivables from customers and other ( b ) 26744 23648 2014 2014 total wholesale credit- related assets 414067 411814 1459 1956 lending-related commitments 446232 434814 206 355 total wholesale credit exposure $ 860299 $ 846628 $ 1665 $ 2311 credit portfolio management derivatives notional , net ( c ) $ ( 27996 ) $ ( 27447 ) $ ( 5 ) $ ( 25 ) liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives ( 14435 ) ( 15201 ) na na ( a ) during 2013 , certain loans that resulted from restructurings that were previously classified as performing were reclassified as nonperforming loans . prior periods were revised to conform with the current presentation . ( b ) receivables from customers and other primarily includes margin loans to prime and retail brokerage customers ; these are classified in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheets . ( c ) represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives used to manage both performing and nonperforming wholesale credit exposures ; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under u.s . gaap . excludes the synthetic credit portfolio . for additional information , see credit derivatives on pages 137 2013138 , and note 6 on pages 220 2013233 of this annual report . ( d ) excludes assets acquired in loan satisfactions. .
Question: what was the change in the total wholesale credit-related assets between 2012 and 2013?
| 2253.0 |
CONVFINQA4360 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis 130 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report wholesale credit portfolio the wholesale credit environment remained favorable throughout 2013 driving an increase in commercial client activity . discipline in underwriting across all areas of lending continues to remain a key point of focus , consistent with evolving market conditions and the firm 2019s risk management activities . the wholesale portfolio is actively managed , in part by conducting ongoing , in-depth reviews of credit quality and of industry , product and client concentrations . during the year , wholesale criticized assets and nonperforming assets decreased from higher levels experienced in 2012 , including a reduction in nonaccrual loans by 39% ( 39 % ) . as of december 31 , 2013 , wholesale exposure ( primarily cib , cb and am ) increased by $ 13.7 billion from december 31 , 2012 , primarily driven by increases of $ 11.4 billion in lending-related commitments and $ 8.4 billion in loans reflecting increased client activity primarily in cb and am . these increases were partially offset by a $ 9.2 billion decrease in derivative receivables . derivative receivables decreased predominantly due to reductions in interest rate derivatives driven by an increase in interest rates and reductions in commodity derivatives due to market movements . the decreases were partially offset by an increase in equity derivatives driven by a rise in equity markets . wholesale credit portfolio december 31 , credit exposure nonperforming ( d ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 , ( in millions )</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loans retained</td><td>$ 308263</td><td>$ 306222</td><td>$ 821</td><td>$ 1434</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loans held-for-sale</td><td>11290</td><td>4406</td><td>26</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loans at fair value ( a )</td><td>2011</td><td>2555</td><td>197</td><td>265</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loans 2013 reported</td><td>321564</td><td>313183</td><td>1044</td><td>1717</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>derivative receivables</td><td>65759</td><td>74983</td><td>415</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>receivables from customers and other ( b )</td><td>26744</td><td>23648</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total wholesale credit-related assets</td><td>414067</td><td>411814</td><td>1459</td><td>1956</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>lending-related commitments</td><td>446232</td><td>434814</td><td>206</td><td>355</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total wholesale credit exposure</td><td>$ 860299</td><td>$ 846628</td><td>$ 1665</td><td>$ 2311</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>credit portfolio management derivatives notional net ( c )</td><td>$ -27996 ( 27996 )</td><td>$ -27447 ( 27447 )</td><td>$ -5 ( 5 )</td><td>$ -25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives</td><td>-14435 ( 14435 )</td><td>-15201 ( 15201 )</td><td>na</td><td>na</td></tr></table> receivables from customers and other ( b ) 26744 23648 2014 2014 total wholesale credit- related assets 414067 411814 1459 1956 lending-related commitments 446232 434814 206 355 total wholesale credit exposure $ 860299 $ 846628 $ 1665 $ 2311 credit portfolio management derivatives notional , net ( c ) $ ( 27996 ) $ ( 27447 ) $ ( 5 ) $ ( 25 ) liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives ( 14435 ) ( 15201 ) na na ( a ) during 2013 , certain loans that resulted from restructurings that were previously classified as performing were reclassified as nonperforming loans . prior periods were revised to conform with the current presentation . ( b ) receivables from customers and other primarily includes margin loans to prime and retail brokerage customers ; these are classified in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheets . ( c ) represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives used to manage both performing and nonperforming wholesale credit exposures ; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under u.s . gaap . excludes the synthetic credit portfolio . for additional information , see credit derivatives on pages 137 2013138 , and note 6 on pages 220 2013233 of this annual report . ( d ) excludes assets acquired in loan satisfactions. .
Question: what was the change in the total wholesale credit-related assets between 2012 and 2013?
Answer: 2253.0
Question: and the percentage change during this time?
| 0.00547 |
CONVFINQA4361 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis 130 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report wholesale credit portfolio the wholesale credit environment remained favorable throughout 2013 driving an increase in commercial client activity . discipline in underwriting across all areas of lending continues to remain a key point of focus , consistent with evolving market conditions and the firm 2019s risk management activities . the wholesale portfolio is actively managed , in part by conducting ongoing , in-depth reviews of credit quality and of industry , product and client concentrations . during the year , wholesale criticized assets and nonperforming assets decreased from higher levels experienced in 2012 , including a reduction in nonaccrual loans by 39% ( 39 % ) . as of december 31 , 2013 , wholesale exposure ( primarily cib , cb and am ) increased by $ 13.7 billion from december 31 , 2012 , primarily driven by increases of $ 11.4 billion in lending-related commitments and $ 8.4 billion in loans reflecting increased client activity primarily in cb and am . these increases were partially offset by a $ 9.2 billion decrease in derivative receivables . derivative receivables decreased predominantly due to reductions in interest rate derivatives driven by an increase in interest rates and reductions in commodity derivatives due to market movements . the decreases were partially offset by an increase in equity derivatives driven by a rise in equity markets . wholesale credit portfolio december 31 , credit exposure nonperforming ( d ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 , ( in millions )</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loans retained</td><td>$ 308263</td><td>$ 306222</td><td>$ 821</td><td>$ 1434</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loans held-for-sale</td><td>11290</td><td>4406</td><td>26</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loans at fair value ( a )</td><td>2011</td><td>2555</td><td>197</td><td>265</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loans 2013 reported</td><td>321564</td><td>313183</td><td>1044</td><td>1717</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>derivative receivables</td><td>65759</td><td>74983</td><td>415</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>receivables from customers and other ( b )</td><td>26744</td><td>23648</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total wholesale credit-related assets</td><td>414067</td><td>411814</td><td>1459</td><td>1956</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>lending-related commitments</td><td>446232</td><td>434814</td><td>206</td><td>355</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total wholesale credit exposure</td><td>$ 860299</td><td>$ 846628</td><td>$ 1665</td><td>$ 2311</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>credit portfolio management derivatives notional net ( c )</td><td>$ -27996 ( 27996 )</td><td>$ -27447 ( 27447 )</td><td>$ -5 ( 5 )</td><td>$ -25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives</td><td>-14435 ( 14435 )</td><td>-15201 ( 15201 )</td><td>na</td><td>na</td></tr></table> receivables from customers and other ( b ) 26744 23648 2014 2014 total wholesale credit- related assets 414067 411814 1459 1956 lending-related commitments 446232 434814 206 355 total wholesale credit exposure $ 860299 $ 846628 $ 1665 $ 2311 credit portfolio management derivatives notional , net ( c ) $ ( 27996 ) $ ( 27447 ) $ ( 5 ) $ ( 25 ) liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives ( 14435 ) ( 15201 ) na na ( a ) during 2013 , certain loans that resulted from restructurings that were previously classified as performing were reclassified as nonperforming loans . prior periods were revised to conform with the current presentation . ( b ) receivables from customers and other primarily includes margin loans to prime and retail brokerage customers ; these are classified in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheets . ( c ) represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives used to manage both performing and nonperforming wholesale credit exposures ; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under u.s . gaap . excludes the synthetic credit portfolio . for additional information , see credit derivatives on pages 137 2013138 , and note 6 on pages 220 2013233 of this annual report . ( d ) excludes assets acquired in loan satisfactions. .
Question: what was the change in the total wholesale credit-related assets between 2012 and 2013?
Answer: 2253.0
Question: and the percentage change during this time?
Answer: 0.00547
Question: what was the difference in loans reported between 2012 and 2013?
| 8381.0 |
CONVFINQA4362 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis 130 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report wholesale credit portfolio the wholesale credit environment remained favorable throughout 2013 driving an increase in commercial client activity . discipline in underwriting across all areas of lending continues to remain a key point of focus , consistent with evolving market conditions and the firm 2019s risk management activities . the wholesale portfolio is actively managed , in part by conducting ongoing , in-depth reviews of credit quality and of industry , product and client concentrations . during the year , wholesale criticized assets and nonperforming assets decreased from higher levels experienced in 2012 , including a reduction in nonaccrual loans by 39% ( 39 % ) . as of december 31 , 2013 , wholesale exposure ( primarily cib , cb and am ) increased by $ 13.7 billion from december 31 , 2012 , primarily driven by increases of $ 11.4 billion in lending-related commitments and $ 8.4 billion in loans reflecting increased client activity primarily in cb and am . these increases were partially offset by a $ 9.2 billion decrease in derivative receivables . derivative receivables decreased predominantly due to reductions in interest rate derivatives driven by an increase in interest rates and reductions in commodity derivatives due to market movements . the decreases were partially offset by an increase in equity derivatives driven by a rise in equity markets . wholesale credit portfolio december 31 , credit exposure nonperforming ( d ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 , ( in millions )</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loans retained</td><td>$ 308263</td><td>$ 306222</td><td>$ 821</td><td>$ 1434</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loans held-for-sale</td><td>11290</td><td>4406</td><td>26</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loans at fair value ( a )</td><td>2011</td><td>2555</td><td>197</td><td>265</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loans 2013 reported</td><td>321564</td><td>313183</td><td>1044</td><td>1717</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>derivative receivables</td><td>65759</td><td>74983</td><td>415</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>receivables from customers and other ( b )</td><td>26744</td><td>23648</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total wholesale credit-related assets</td><td>414067</td><td>411814</td><td>1459</td><td>1956</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>lending-related commitments</td><td>446232</td><td>434814</td><td>206</td><td>355</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total wholesale credit exposure</td><td>$ 860299</td><td>$ 846628</td><td>$ 1665</td><td>$ 2311</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>credit portfolio management derivatives notional net ( c )</td><td>$ -27996 ( 27996 )</td><td>$ -27447 ( 27447 )</td><td>$ -5 ( 5 )</td><td>$ -25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives</td><td>-14435 ( 14435 )</td><td>-15201 ( 15201 )</td><td>na</td><td>na</td></tr></table> receivables from customers and other ( b ) 26744 23648 2014 2014 total wholesale credit- related assets 414067 411814 1459 1956 lending-related commitments 446232 434814 206 355 total wholesale credit exposure $ 860299 $ 846628 $ 1665 $ 2311 credit portfolio management derivatives notional , net ( c ) $ ( 27996 ) $ ( 27447 ) $ ( 5 ) $ ( 25 ) liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives ( 14435 ) ( 15201 ) na na ( a ) during 2013 , certain loans that resulted from restructurings that were previously classified as performing were reclassified as nonperforming loans . prior periods were revised to conform with the current presentation . ( b ) receivables from customers and other primarily includes margin loans to prime and retail brokerage customers ; these are classified in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheets . ( c ) represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives used to manage both performing and nonperforming wholesale credit exposures ; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under u.s . gaap . excludes the synthetic credit portfolio . for additional information , see credit derivatives on pages 137 2013138 , and note 6 on pages 220 2013233 of this annual report . ( d ) excludes assets acquired in loan satisfactions. .
Question: what was the change in the total wholesale credit-related assets between 2012 and 2013?
Answer: 2253.0
Question: and the percentage change during this time?
Answer: 0.00547
Question: what was the difference in loans reported between 2012 and 2013?
Answer: 8381.0
Question: so what was the percentage change during this time?
| 0.02676 |
CONVFINQA4363 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements derivatives with credit-related contingent features certain of the firm 2019s derivatives have been transacted under bilateral agreements with counterparties who may require the firm to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on changes in the firm 2019s credit ratings . the firm assesses the impact of these bilateral agreements by determining the collateral or termination payments that would occur assuming a downgrade by all rating agencies . a downgrade by any one rating agency , depending on the agency 2019s relative ratings of the firm at the time of the downgrade , may have an impact which is comparable to the impact of a downgrade by all rating agencies . the table below presents the aggregate fair value of net derivative liabilities under such agreements ( excluding application of collateral posted to reduce these liabilities ) , the related aggregate fair value of the assets posted as collateral , and the additional collateral or termination payments that could have been called at the reporting date by counterparties in the event of a one-notch and two-notch downgrade in the firm 2019s credit ratings. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2014</td><td>as of december 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements</td><td>$ 35764</td><td>$ 22176</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>collateral posted</td><td>30824</td><td>18178</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade</td><td>1072</td><td>911</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade</td><td>2815</td><td>2989</td></tr></table> additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade 1072 911 additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade 2815 2989 credit derivatives the firm enters into a broad array of credit derivatives in locations around the world to facilitate client transactions and to manage the credit risk associated with market- making and investing and lending activities . credit derivatives are actively managed based on the firm 2019s net risk position . credit derivatives are individually negotiated contracts and can have various settlement and payment conventions . credit events include failure to pay , bankruptcy , acceleration of indebtedness , restructuring , repudiation and dissolution of the reference entity . credit default swaps . single-name credit default swaps protect the buyer against the loss of principal on one or more bonds , loans or mortgages ( reference obligations ) in the event the issuer ( reference entity ) of the reference obligations suffers a credit event . the buyer of protection pays an initial or periodic premium to the seller and receives protection for the period of the contract . if there is no credit event , as defined in the contract , the seller of protection makes no payments to the buyer of protection . however , if a credit event occurs , the seller of protection is required to make a payment to the buyer of protection , which is calculated in accordance with the terms of the contract . credit indices , baskets and tranches . credit derivatives may reference a basket of single-name credit default swaps or a broad-based index . if a credit event occurs in one of the underlying reference obligations , the protection seller pays the protection buyer . the payment is typically a pro-rata portion of the transaction 2019s total notional amount based on the underlying defaulted reference obligation . in certain transactions , the credit risk of a basket or index is separated into various portions ( tranches ) , each having different levels of subordination . the most junior tranches cover initial defaults and once losses exceed the notional amount of these junior tranches , any excess loss is covered by the next most senior tranche in the capital structure . total return swaps . a total return swap transfers the risks relating to economic performance of a reference obligation from the protection buyer to the protection seller . typically , the protection buyer receives from the protection seller a floating rate of interest and protection against any reduction in fair value of the reference obligation , and in return the protection seller receives the cash flows associated with the reference obligation , plus any increase in the fair value of the reference obligation . 132 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .
Question: what was the total of net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements in 2014?
| 35764.0 |
CONVFINQA4364 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements derivatives with credit-related contingent features certain of the firm 2019s derivatives have been transacted under bilateral agreements with counterparties who may require the firm to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on changes in the firm 2019s credit ratings . the firm assesses the impact of these bilateral agreements by determining the collateral or termination payments that would occur assuming a downgrade by all rating agencies . a downgrade by any one rating agency , depending on the agency 2019s relative ratings of the firm at the time of the downgrade , may have an impact which is comparable to the impact of a downgrade by all rating agencies . the table below presents the aggregate fair value of net derivative liabilities under such agreements ( excluding application of collateral posted to reduce these liabilities ) , the related aggregate fair value of the assets posted as collateral , and the additional collateral or termination payments that could have been called at the reporting date by counterparties in the event of a one-notch and two-notch downgrade in the firm 2019s credit ratings. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2014</td><td>as of december 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements</td><td>$ 35764</td><td>$ 22176</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>collateral posted</td><td>30824</td><td>18178</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade</td><td>1072</td><td>911</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade</td><td>2815</td><td>2989</td></tr></table> additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade 1072 911 additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade 2815 2989 credit derivatives the firm enters into a broad array of credit derivatives in locations around the world to facilitate client transactions and to manage the credit risk associated with market- making and investing and lending activities . credit derivatives are actively managed based on the firm 2019s net risk position . credit derivatives are individually negotiated contracts and can have various settlement and payment conventions . credit events include failure to pay , bankruptcy , acceleration of indebtedness , restructuring , repudiation and dissolution of the reference entity . credit default swaps . single-name credit default swaps protect the buyer against the loss of principal on one or more bonds , loans or mortgages ( reference obligations ) in the event the issuer ( reference entity ) of the reference obligations suffers a credit event . the buyer of protection pays an initial or periodic premium to the seller and receives protection for the period of the contract . if there is no credit event , as defined in the contract , the seller of protection makes no payments to the buyer of protection . however , if a credit event occurs , the seller of protection is required to make a payment to the buyer of protection , which is calculated in accordance with the terms of the contract . credit indices , baskets and tranches . credit derivatives may reference a basket of single-name credit default swaps or a broad-based index . if a credit event occurs in one of the underlying reference obligations , the protection seller pays the protection buyer . the payment is typically a pro-rata portion of the transaction 2019s total notional amount based on the underlying defaulted reference obligation . in certain transactions , the credit risk of a basket or index is separated into various portions ( tranches ) , each having different levels of subordination . the most junior tranches cover initial defaults and once losses exceed the notional amount of these junior tranches , any excess loss is covered by the next most senior tranche in the capital structure . total return swaps . a total return swap transfers the risks relating to economic performance of a reference obligation from the protection buyer to the protection seller . typically , the protection buyer receives from the protection seller a floating rate of interest and protection against any reduction in fair value of the reference obligation , and in return the protection seller receives the cash flows associated with the reference obligation , plus any increase in the fair value of the reference obligation . 132 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .
Question: what was the total of net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements in 2014?
Answer: 35764.0
Question: and what was it in 2013?
| 22176.0 |
CONVFINQA4365 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements derivatives with credit-related contingent features certain of the firm 2019s derivatives have been transacted under bilateral agreements with counterparties who may require the firm to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on changes in the firm 2019s credit ratings . the firm assesses the impact of these bilateral agreements by determining the collateral or termination payments that would occur assuming a downgrade by all rating agencies . a downgrade by any one rating agency , depending on the agency 2019s relative ratings of the firm at the time of the downgrade , may have an impact which is comparable to the impact of a downgrade by all rating agencies . the table below presents the aggregate fair value of net derivative liabilities under such agreements ( excluding application of collateral posted to reduce these liabilities ) , the related aggregate fair value of the assets posted as collateral , and the additional collateral or termination payments that could have been called at the reporting date by counterparties in the event of a one-notch and two-notch downgrade in the firm 2019s credit ratings. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2014</td><td>as of december 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements</td><td>$ 35764</td><td>$ 22176</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>collateral posted</td><td>30824</td><td>18178</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade</td><td>1072</td><td>911</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade</td><td>2815</td><td>2989</td></tr></table> additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade 1072 911 additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade 2815 2989 credit derivatives the firm enters into a broad array of credit derivatives in locations around the world to facilitate client transactions and to manage the credit risk associated with market- making and investing and lending activities . credit derivatives are actively managed based on the firm 2019s net risk position . credit derivatives are individually negotiated contracts and can have various settlement and payment conventions . credit events include failure to pay , bankruptcy , acceleration of indebtedness , restructuring , repudiation and dissolution of the reference entity . credit default swaps . single-name credit default swaps protect the buyer against the loss of principal on one or more bonds , loans or mortgages ( reference obligations ) in the event the issuer ( reference entity ) of the reference obligations suffers a credit event . the buyer of protection pays an initial or periodic premium to the seller and receives protection for the period of the contract . if there is no credit event , as defined in the contract , the seller of protection makes no payments to the buyer of protection . however , if a credit event occurs , the seller of protection is required to make a payment to the buyer of protection , which is calculated in accordance with the terms of the contract . credit indices , baskets and tranches . credit derivatives may reference a basket of single-name credit default swaps or a broad-based index . if a credit event occurs in one of the underlying reference obligations , the protection seller pays the protection buyer . the payment is typically a pro-rata portion of the transaction 2019s total notional amount based on the underlying defaulted reference obligation . in certain transactions , the credit risk of a basket or index is separated into various portions ( tranches ) , each having different levels of subordination . the most junior tranches cover initial defaults and once losses exceed the notional amount of these junior tranches , any excess loss is covered by the next most senior tranche in the capital structure . total return swaps . a total return swap transfers the risks relating to economic performance of a reference obligation from the protection buyer to the protection seller . typically , the protection buyer receives from the protection seller a floating rate of interest and protection against any reduction in fair value of the reference obligation , and in return the protection seller receives the cash flows associated with the reference obligation , plus any increase in the fair value of the reference obligation . 132 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .
Question: what was the total of net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements in 2014?
Answer: 35764.0
Question: and what was it in 2013?
Answer: 22176.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 13588.0 |
CONVFINQA4366 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements derivatives with credit-related contingent features certain of the firm 2019s derivatives have been transacted under bilateral agreements with counterparties who may require the firm to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on changes in the firm 2019s credit ratings . the firm assesses the impact of these bilateral agreements by determining the collateral or termination payments that would occur assuming a downgrade by all rating agencies . a downgrade by any one rating agency , depending on the agency 2019s relative ratings of the firm at the time of the downgrade , may have an impact which is comparable to the impact of a downgrade by all rating agencies . the table below presents the aggregate fair value of net derivative liabilities under such agreements ( excluding application of collateral posted to reduce these liabilities ) , the related aggregate fair value of the assets posted as collateral , and the additional collateral or termination payments that could have been called at the reporting date by counterparties in the event of a one-notch and two-notch downgrade in the firm 2019s credit ratings. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2014</td><td>as of december 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements</td><td>$ 35764</td><td>$ 22176</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>collateral posted</td><td>30824</td><td>18178</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade</td><td>1072</td><td>911</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade</td><td>2815</td><td>2989</td></tr></table> additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade 1072 911 additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade 2815 2989 credit derivatives the firm enters into a broad array of credit derivatives in locations around the world to facilitate client transactions and to manage the credit risk associated with market- making and investing and lending activities . credit derivatives are actively managed based on the firm 2019s net risk position . credit derivatives are individually negotiated contracts and can have various settlement and payment conventions . credit events include failure to pay , bankruptcy , acceleration of indebtedness , restructuring , repudiation and dissolution of the reference entity . credit default swaps . single-name credit default swaps protect the buyer against the loss of principal on one or more bonds , loans or mortgages ( reference obligations ) in the event the issuer ( reference entity ) of the reference obligations suffers a credit event . the buyer of protection pays an initial or periodic premium to the seller and receives protection for the period of the contract . if there is no credit event , as defined in the contract , the seller of protection makes no payments to the buyer of protection . however , if a credit event occurs , the seller of protection is required to make a payment to the buyer of protection , which is calculated in accordance with the terms of the contract . credit indices , baskets and tranches . credit derivatives may reference a basket of single-name credit default swaps or a broad-based index . if a credit event occurs in one of the underlying reference obligations , the protection seller pays the protection buyer . the payment is typically a pro-rata portion of the transaction 2019s total notional amount based on the underlying defaulted reference obligation . in certain transactions , the credit risk of a basket or index is separated into various portions ( tranches ) , each having different levels of subordination . the most junior tranches cover initial defaults and once losses exceed the notional amount of these junior tranches , any excess loss is covered by the next most senior tranche in the capital structure . total return swaps . a total return swap transfers the risks relating to economic performance of a reference obligation from the protection buyer to the protection seller . typically , the protection buyer receives from the protection seller a floating rate of interest and protection against any reduction in fair value of the reference obligation , and in return the protection seller receives the cash flows associated with the reference obligation , plus any increase in the fair value of the reference obligation . 132 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .
Question: what was the total of net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements in 2014?
Answer: 35764.0
Question: and what was it in 2013?
Answer: 22176.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 13588.0
Question: what was the total of net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements in 2013?
| 22176.0 |
CONVFINQA4367 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements derivatives with credit-related contingent features certain of the firm 2019s derivatives have been transacted under bilateral agreements with counterparties who may require the firm to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on changes in the firm 2019s credit ratings . the firm assesses the impact of these bilateral agreements by determining the collateral or termination payments that would occur assuming a downgrade by all rating agencies . a downgrade by any one rating agency , depending on the agency 2019s relative ratings of the firm at the time of the downgrade , may have an impact which is comparable to the impact of a downgrade by all rating agencies . the table below presents the aggregate fair value of net derivative liabilities under such agreements ( excluding application of collateral posted to reduce these liabilities ) , the related aggregate fair value of the assets posted as collateral , and the additional collateral or termination payments that could have been called at the reporting date by counterparties in the event of a one-notch and two-notch downgrade in the firm 2019s credit ratings. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2014</td><td>as of december 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements</td><td>$ 35764</td><td>$ 22176</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>collateral posted</td><td>30824</td><td>18178</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade</td><td>1072</td><td>911</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade</td><td>2815</td><td>2989</td></tr></table> additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade 1072 911 additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade 2815 2989 credit derivatives the firm enters into a broad array of credit derivatives in locations around the world to facilitate client transactions and to manage the credit risk associated with market- making and investing and lending activities . credit derivatives are actively managed based on the firm 2019s net risk position . credit derivatives are individually negotiated contracts and can have various settlement and payment conventions . credit events include failure to pay , bankruptcy , acceleration of indebtedness , restructuring , repudiation and dissolution of the reference entity . credit default swaps . single-name credit default swaps protect the buyer against the loss of principal on one or more bonds , loans or mortgages ( reference obligations ) in the event the issuer ( reference entity ) of the reference obligations suffers a credit event . the buyer of protection pays an initial or periodic premium to the seller and receives protection for the period of the contract . if there is no credit event , as defined in the contract , the seller of protection makes no payments to the buyer of protection . however , if a credit event occurs , the seller of protection is required to make a payment to the buyer of protection , which is calculated in accordance with the terms of the contract . credit indices , baskets and tranches . credit derivatives may reference a basket of single-name credit default swaps or a broad-based index . if a credit event occurs in one of the underlying reference obligations , the protection seller pays the protection buyer . the payment is typically a pro-rata portion of the transaction 2019s total notional amount based on the underlying defaulted reference obligation . in certain transactions , the credit risk of a basket or index is separated into various portions ( tranches ) , each having different levels of subordination . the most junior tranches cover initial defaults and once losses exceed the notional amount of these junior tranches , any excess loss is covered by the next most senior tranche in the capital structure . total return swaps . a total return swap transfers the risks relating to economic performance of a reference obligation from the protection buyer to the protection seller . typically , the protection buyer receives from the protection seller a floating rate of interest and protection against any reduction in fair value of the reference obligation , and in return the protection seller receives the cash flows associated with the reference obligation , plus any increase in the fair value of the reference obligation . 132 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .
Question: what was the total of net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements in 2014?
Answer: 35764.0
Question: and what was it in 2013?
Answer: 22176.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 13588.0
Question: what was the total of net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements in 2013?
Answer: 22176.0
Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2013 total, in percentage?
| 0.61273 |
CONVFINQA4368 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
57management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations facility include covenants relating to net interest coverage and total debt-to-book capitalization ratios . the company was in compliance with the terms of the 3-year credit facility at december 31 , 2005 . the company has never borrowed under its domestic revolving credit facilities . utilization of the non-u.s . credit facilities may also be dependent on the company's ability to meet certain conditions at the time a borrowing is requested . contractual obligations , guarantees , and other purchase commitments contractual obligations summarized in the table below are the company's obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations ( assuming earliest possible exercise of put rights by holders ) , lease payment obligations , and purchase obligations as of december 31 , 2005 . payments due by period ( 1 ) ( in millions ) total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 thereafter . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2006</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt obligations</td><td>$ 4033</td><td>$ 119</td><td>$ 1222</td><td>$ 200</td><td>$ 2</td><td>$ 529</td><td>$ 1961</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>1150</td><td>438</td><td>190</td><td>134</td><td>109</td><td>84</td><td>195</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchase obligations</td><td>992</td><td>418</td><td>28</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>539</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 6175</td><td>$ 975</td><td>$ 1440</td><td>$ 337</td><td>$ 113</td><td>$ 615</td><td>$ 2695</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amounts included represent firm , non-cancelable commitments . debt obligations : at december 31 , 2005 , the company's long-term debt obligations , including current maturities and unamortized discount and issue costs , totaled $ 4.0 billion , as compared to $ 5.0 billion at december 31 , 2004 . a table of all outstanding long-term debt securities can be found in note 4 , ""debt and credit facilities'' to the company's consolidated financial statements . as previously discussed , the decrease in the long- term debt obligations as compared to december 31 , 2004 , was due to the redemptions and repurchases of $ 1.0 billion principal amount of outstanding securities during 2005 . also , as previously discussed , the remaining $ 118 million of 7.6% ( 7.6 % ) notes due january 1 , 2007 were reclassified to current maturities of long-term debt . lease obligations : the company owns most of its major facilities , but does lease certain office , factory and warehouse space , land , and information technology and other equipment under principally non-cancelable operating leases . at december 31 , 2005 , future minimum lease obligations , net of minimum sublease rentals , totaled $ 1.2 billion . rental expense , net of sublease income , was $ 254 million in 2005 , $ 217 million in 2004 and $ 223 million in 2003 . purchase obligations : the company has entered into agreements for the purchase of inventory , license of software , promotional agreements , and research and development agreements which are firm commitments and are not cancelable . the longest of these agreements extends through 2015 . total payments expected to be made under these agreements total $ 992 million . commitments under other long-term agreements : the company has entered into certain long-term agreements to purchase software , components , supplies and materials from suppliers . most of the agreements extend for periods of one to three years ( three to five years for software ) . however , generally these agreements do not obligate the company to make any purchases , and many permit the company to terminate the agreement with advance notice ( usually ranging from 60 to 180 days ) . if the company were to terminate these agreements , it generally would be liable for certain termination charges , typically based on work performed and supplier on-hand inventory and raw materials attributable to canceled orders . the company's liability would only arise in the event it terminates the agreements for reasons other than ""cause.'' in 2003 , the company entered into outsourcing contracts for certain corporate functions , such as benefit administration and information technology related services . these contracts generally extend for 10 years and are expected to expire in 2013 . the total payments under these contracts are approximately $ 3 billion over 10 years ; however , these contracts can be terminated . termination would result in a penalty substantially less than the annual contract payments . the company would also be required to find another source for these services , including the possibility of performing them in-house . as is customary in bidding for and completing network infrastructure projects and pursuant to a practice the company has followed for many years , the company has a number of performance/bid bonds and standby letters of credit outstanding , primarily relating to projects of government and enterprise mobility solutions segment and the networks segment . these instruments normally have maturities of up to three years and are standard in the .
Question: what was the difference in total contractual obligations between 2006 and 2010?
| 360.0 |
CONVFINQA4369 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
57management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations facility include covenants relating to net interest coverage and total debt-to-book capitalization ratios . the company was in compliance with the terms of the 3-year credit facility at december 31 , 2005 . the company has never borrowed under its domestic revolving credit facilities . utilization of the non-u.s . credit facilities may also be dependent on the company's ability to meet certain conditions at the time a borrowing is requested . contractual obligations , guarantees , and other purchase commitments contractual obligations summarized in the table below are the company's obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations ( assuming earliest possible exercise of put rights by holders ) , lease payment obligations , and purchase obligations as of december 31 , 2005 . payments due by period ( 1 ) ( in millions ) total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 thereafter . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2006</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt obligations</td><td>$ 4033</td><td>$ 119</td><td>$ 1222</td><td>$ 200</td><td>$ 2</td><td>$ 529</td><td>$ 1961</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>1150</td><td>438</td><td>190</td><td>134</td><td>109</td><td>84</td><td>195</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchase obligations</td><td>992</td><td>418</td><td>28</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>539</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 6175</td><td>$ 975</td><td>$ 1440</td><td>$ 337</td><td>$ 113</td><td>$ 615</td><td>$ 2695</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amounts included represent firm , non-cancelable commitments . debt obligations : at december 31 , 2005 , the company's long-term debt obligations , including current maturities and unamortized discount and issue costs , totaled $ 4.0 billion , as compared to $ 5.0 billion at december 31 , 2004 . a table of all outstanding long-term debt securities can be found in note 4 , ""debt and credit facilities'' to the company's consolidated financial statements . as previously discussed , the decrease in the long- term debt obligations as compared to december 31 , 2004 , was due to the redemptions and repurchases of $ 1.0 billion principal amount of outstanding securities during 2005 . also , as previously discussed , the remaining $ 118 million of 7.6% ( 7.6 % ) notes due january 1 , 2007 were reclassified to current maturities of long-term debt . lease obligations : the company owns most of its major facilities , but does lease certain office , factory and warehouse space , land , and information technology and other equipment under principally non-cancelable operating leases . at december 31 , 2005 , future minimum lease obligations , net of minimum sublease rentals , totaled $ 1.2 billion . rental expense , net of sublease income , was $ 254 million in 2005 , $ 217 million in 2004 and $ 223 million in 2003 . purchase obligations : the company has entered into agreements for the purchase of inventory , license of software , promotional agreements , and research and development agreements which are firm commitments and are not cancelable . the longest of these agreements extends through 2015 . total payments expected to be made under these agreements total $ 992 million . commitments under other long-term agreements : the company has entered into certain long-term agreements to purchase software , components , supplies and materials from suppliers . most of the agreements extend for periods of one to three years ( three to five years for software ) . however , generally these agreements do not obligate the company to make any purchases , and many permit the company to terminate the agreement with advance notice ( usually ranging from 60 to 180 days ) . if the company were to terminate these agreements , it generally would be liable for certain termination charges , typically based on work performed and supplier on-hand inventory and raw materials attributable to canceled orders . the company's liability would only arise in the event it terminates the agreements for reasons other than ""cause.'' in 2003 , the company entered into outsourcing contracts for certain corporate functions , such as benefit administration and information technology related services . these contracts generally extend for 10 years and are expected to expire in 2013 . the total payments under these contracts are approximately $ 3 billion over 10 years ; however , these contracts can be terminated . termination would result in a penalty substantially less than the annual contract payments . the company would also be required to find another source for these services , including the possibility of performing them in-house . as is customary in bidding for and completing network infrastructure projects and pursuant to a practice the company has followed for many years , the company has a number of performance/bid bonds and standby letters of credit outstanding , primarily relating to projects of government and enterprise mobility solutions segment and the networks segment . these instruments normally have maturities of up to three years and are standard in the .
Question: what was the difference in total contractual obligations between 2006 and 2010?
Answer: 360.0
Question: and the percentage change during this time?
| 0.36923 |
CONVFINQA4370 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance of the company 2019s obligations under the senior notes , including any repurchase obligations resulting from a change of control , is unconditionally guaranteed , jointly and severally , on an unsecured basis , by each of hii 2019s existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries that guarantees debt under the credit facility ( the 201csubsidiary guarantors 201d ) . the guarantees rank equally with all other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of the guarantors . the subsidiary guarantors are each directly or indirectly 100% ( 100 % ) owned by hii . there are no significant restrictions on the ability of hii or any subsidiary guarantor to obtain funds from their respective subsidiaries by dividend or loan . mississippi economic development revenue bonds 2014as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the company had $ 83.7 million outstanding from the issuance of industrial revenue bonds issued by the mississippi business finance corporation . these bonds accrue interest at a fixed rate of 7.81% ( 7.81 % ) per annum ( payable semi-annually ) and mature in 2024 . while repayment of principal and interest is guaranteed by northrop grumman systems corporation , hii has agreed to indemnify northrop grumman systems corporation for any losses related to the guaranty . in accordance with the terms of the bonds , the proceeds have been used to finance the construction , reconstruction , and renovation of the company 2019s interest in certain ship manufacturing and repair facilities , or portions thereof , located in the state of mississippi . gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds 2014as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the company had $ 21.6 million outstanding from the issuance of gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds ( 201cgo zone irbs 201d ) issued by the mississippi business finance corporation . the go zone irbs were initially issued in a principal amount of $ 200 million , and in november 2010 , in connection with the anticipated spin-off , hii purchased $ 178 million of the bonds using the proceeds from a $ 178 million intercompany loan from northrop grumman . see note 20 : related party transactions and former parent company equity . the remaining bonds accrue interest at a fixed rate of 4.55% ( 4.55 % ) per annum ( payable semi-annually ) , and mature in 2028 . in accordance with the terms of the bonds , the proceeds have been used to finance the construction , reconstruction , and renovation of the company 2019s interest in certain ship manufacturing and repair facilities , or portions thereof , located in the state of mississippi . the estimated fair value of the company 2019s total long-term debt , including current portions , at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was $ 1864 million and $ 128 million , respectively . the fair value of the total long-term debt was calculated based on recent trades for most of the company 2019s debt instruments or based on interest rates prevailing on debt with substantially similar risks , terms and maturities . the aggregate amounts of principal payments due on long-term debt for each of the next five years and thereafter are : ( $ in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 29</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>108</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>288</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1305</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>$ 1859</td></tr></table> 14 . investigations , claims , and litigation the company is involved in legal proceedings before various courts and administrative agencies , and is periodically subject to government examinations , inquiries and investigations . pursuant to fasb accounting standard codification 450 contingencies , the company has accrued for losses associated with investigations , claims and litigation when , and to the extent that , loss amounts related to the investigations , claims and litigation are probable and can be reasonably estimated . the actual losses that might be incurred to resolve such investigations , claims and litigation may be higher or lower than the amounts accrued . for matters where a material loss is probable or reasonably possible and the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated , but the company is able to reasonably estimate a range of possible losses , such estimated range is required to be disclosed in these notes . this estimated range would be based on information currently available to the company and would involve elements of judgment and significant uncertainties . this estimated range of possible loss would not represent the company 2019s maximum possible loss exposure . for matters as to which the company is not able to reasonably estimate a possible loss or range of loss , the company is required to indicate the reasons why it is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss . for matters not specifically described in these notes , the company does not believe , based on information currently available to it , that it is reasonably possible that the liabilities , if any , arising from .
Question: what is the value of the long-term debt due after 2016?
| 1305.0 |
CONVFINQA4371 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance of the company 2019s obligations under the senior notes , including any repurchase obligations resulting from a change of control , is unconditionally guaranteed , jointly and severally , on an unsecured basis , by each of hii 2019s existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries that guarantees debt under the credit facility ( the 201csubsidiary guarantors 201d ) . the guarantees rank equally with all other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of the guarantors . the subsidiary guarantors are each directly or indirectly 100% ( 100 % ) owned by hii . there are no significant restrictions on the ability of hii or any subsidiary guarantor to obtain funds from their respective subsidiaries by dividend or loan . mississippi economic development revenue bonds 2014as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the company had $ 83.7 million outstanding from the issuance of industrial revenue bonds issued by the mississippi business finance corporation . these bonds accrue interest at a fixed rate of 7.81% ( 7.81 % ) per annum ( payable semi-annually ) and mature in 2024 . while repayment of principal and interest is guaranteed by northrop grumman systems corporation , hii has agreed to indemnify northrop grumman systems corporation for any losses related to the guaranty . in accordance with the terms of the bonds , the proceeds have been used to finance the construction , reconstruction , and renovation of the company 2019s interest in certain ship manufacturing and repair facilities , or portions thereof , located in the state of mississippi . gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds 2014as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the company had $ 21.6 million outstanding from the issuance of gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds ( 201cgo zone irbs 201d ) issued by the mississippi business finance corporation . the go zone irbs were initially issued in a principal amount of $ 200 million , and in november 2010 , in connection with the anticipated spin-off , hii purchased $ 178 million of the bonds using the proceeds from a $ 178 million intercompany loan from northrop grumman . see note 20 : related party transactions and former parent company equity . the remaining bonds accrue interest at a fixed rate of 4.55% ( 4.55 % ) per annum ( payable semi-annually ) , and mature in 2028 . in accordance with the terms of the bonds , the proceeds have been used to finance the construction , reconstruction , and renovation of the company 2019s interest in certain ship manufacturing and repair facilities , or portions thereof , located in the state of mississippi . the estimated fair value of the company 2019s total long-term debt , including current portions , at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was $ 1864 million and $ 128 million , respectively . the fair value of the total long-term debt was calculated based on recent trades for most of the company 2019s debt instruments or based on interest rates prevailing on debt with substantially similar risks , terms and maturities . the aggregate amounts of principal payments due on long-term debt for each of the next five years and thereafter are : ( $ in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 29</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>108</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>288</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1305</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>$ 1859</td></tr></table> 14 . investigations , claims , and litigation the company is involved in legal proceedings before various courts and administrative agencies , and is periodically subject to government examinations , inquiries and investigations . pursuant to fasb accounting standard codification 450 contingencies , the company has accrued for losses associated with investigations , claims and litigation when , and to the extent that , loss amounts related to the investigations , claims and litigation are probable and can be reasonably estimated . the actual losses that might be incurred to resolve such investigations , claims and litigation may be higher or lower than the amounts accrued . for matters where a material loss is probable or reasonably possible and the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated , but the company is able to reasonably estimate a range of possible losses , such estimated range is required to be disclosed in these notes . this estimated range would be based on information currently available to the company and would involve elements of judgment and significant uncertainties . this estimated range of possible loss would not represent the company 2019s maximum possible loss exposure . for matters as to which the company is not able to reasonably estimate a possible loss or range of loss , the company is required to indicate the reasons why it is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss . for matters not specifically described in these notes , the company does not believe , based on information currently available to it , that it is reasonably possible that the liabilities , if any , arising from .
Question: what is the value of the long-term debt due after 2016?
Answer: 1305.0
Question: and what is the total long-term debt?
| 1859.0 |
CONVFINQA4372 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance of the company 2019s obligations under the senior notes , including any repurchase obligations resulting from a change of control , is unconditionally guaranteed , jointly and severally , on an unsecured basis , by each of hii 2019s existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries that guarantees debt under the credit facility ( the 201csubsidiary guarantors 201d ) . the guarantees rank equally with all other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of the guarantors . the subsidiary guarantors are each directly or indirectly 100% ( 100 % ) owned by hii . there are no significant restrictions on the ability of hii or any subsidiary guarantor to obtain funds from their respective subsidiaries by dividend or loan . mississippi economic development revenue bonds 2014as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the company had $ 83.7 million outstanding from the issuance of industrial revenue bonds issued by the mississippi business finance corporation . these bonds accrue interest at a fixed rate of 7.81% ( 7.81 % ) per annum ( payable semi-annually ) and mature in 2024 . while repayment of principal and interest is guaranteed by northrop grumman systems corporation , hii has agreed to indemnify northrop grumman systems corporation for any losses related to the guaranty . in accordance with the terms of the bonds , the proceeds have been used to finance the construction , reconstruction , and renovation of the company 2019s interest in certain ship manufacturing and repair facilities , or portions thereof , located in the state of mississippi . gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds 2014as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the company had $ 21.6 million outstanding from the issuance of gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds ( 201cgo zone irbs 201d ) issued by the mississippi business finance corporation . the go zone irbs were initially issued in a principal amount of $ 200 million , and in november 2010 , in connection with the anticipated spin-off , hii purchased $ 178 million of the bonds using the proceeds from a $ 178 million intercompany loan from northrop grumman . see note 20 : related party transactions and former parent company equity . the remaining bonds accrue interest at a fixed rate of 4.55% ( 4.55 % ) per annum ( payable semi-annually ) , and mature in 2028 . in accordance with the terms of the bonds , the proceeds have been used to finance the construction , reconstruction , and renovation of the company 2019s interest in certain ship manufacturing and repair facilities , or portions thereof , located in the state of mississippi . the estimated fair value of the company 2019s total long-term debt , including current portions , at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was $ 1864 million and $ 128 million , respectively . the fair value of the total long-term debt was calculated based on recent trades for most of the company 2019s debt instruments or based on interest rates prevailing on debt with substantially similar risks , terms and maturities . the aggregate amounts of principal payments due on long-term debt for each of the next five years and thereafter are : ( $ in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 29</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>108</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>288</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1305</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>$ 1859</td></tr></table> 14 . investigations , claims , and litigation the company is involved in legal proceedings before various courts and administrative agencies , and is periodically subject to government examinations , inquiries and investigations . pursuant to fasb accounting standard codification 450 contingencies , the company has accrued for losses associated with investigations , claims and litigation when , and to the extent that , loss amounts related to the investigations , claims and litigation are probable and can be reasonably estimated . the actual losses that might be incurred to resolve such investigations , claims and litigation may be higher or lower than the amounts accrued . for matters where a material loss is probable or reasonably possible and the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated , but the company is able to reasonably estimate a range of possible losses , such estimated range is required to be disclosed in these notes . this estimated range would be based on information currently available to the company and would involve elements of judgment and significant uncertainties . this estimated range of possible loss would not represent the company 2019s maximum possible loss exposure . for matters as to which the company is not able to reasonably estimate a possible loss or range of loss , the company is required to indicate the reasons why it is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss . for matters not specifically described in these notes , the company does not believe , based on information currently available to it , that it is reasonably possible that the liabilities , if any , arising from .
Question: what is the value of the long-term debt due after 2016?
Answer: 1305.0
Question: and what is the total long-term debt?
Answer: 1859.0
Question: how much, then, does that value represent in relation to this total?
| 0.70199 |
CONVFINQA4373 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance of the company 2019s obligations under the senior notes , including any repurchase obligations resulting from a change of control , is unconditionally guaranteed , jointly and severally , on an unsecured basis , by each of hii 2019s existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries that guarantees debt under the credit facility ( the 201csubsidiary guarantors 201d ) . the guarantees rank equally with all other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of the guarantors . the subsidiary guarantors are each directly or indirectly 100% ( 100 % ) owned by hii . there are no significant restrictions on the ability of hii or any subsidiary guarantor to obtain funds from their respective subsidiaries by dividend or loan . mississippi economic development revenue bonds 2014as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the company had $ 83.7 million outstanding from the issuance of industrial revenue bonds issued by the mississippi business finance corporation . these bonds accrue interest at a fixed rate of 7.81% ( 7.81 % ) per annum ( payable semi-annually ) and mature in 2024 . while repayment of principal and interest is guaranteed by northrop grumman systems corporation , hii has agreed to indemnify northrop grumman systems corporation for any losses related to the guaranty . in accordance with the terms of the bonds , the proceeds have been used to finance the construction , reconstruction , and renovation of the company 2019s interest in certain ship manufacturing and repair facilities , or portions thereof , located in the state of mississippi . gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds 2014as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the company had $ 21.6 million outstanding from the issuance of gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds ( 201cgo zone irbs 201d ) issued by the mississippi business finance corporation . the go zone irbs were initially issued in a principal amount of $ 200 million , and in november 2010 , in connection with the anticipated spin-off , hii purchased $ 178 million of the bonds using the proceeds from a $ 178 million intercompany loan from northrop grumman . see note 20 : related party transactions and former parent company equity . the remaining bonds accrue interest at a fixed rate of 4.55% ( 4.55 % ) per annum ( payable semi-annually ) , and mature in 2028 . in accordance with the terms of the bonds , the proceeds have been used to finance the construction , reconstruction , and renovation of the company 2019s interest in certain ship manufacturing and repair facilities , or portions thereof , located in the state of mississippi . the estimated fair value of the company 2019s total long-term debt , including current portions , at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was $ 1864 million and $ 128 million , respectively . the fair value of the total long-term debt was calculated based on recent trades for most of the company 2019s debt instruments or based on interest rates prevailing on debt with substantially similar risks , terms and maturities . the aggregate amounts of principal payments due on long-term debt for each of the next five years and thereafter are : ( $ in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 29</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>108</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>288</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1305</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>$ 1859</td></tr></table> 14 . investigations , claims , and litigation the company is involved in legal proceedings before various courts and administrative agencies , and is periodically subject to government examinations , inquiries and investigations . pursuant to fasb accounting standard codification 450 contingencies , the company has accrued for losses associated with investigations , claims and litigation when , and to the extent that , loss amounts related to the investigations , claims and litigation are probable and can be reasonably estimated . the actual losses that might be incurred to resolve such investigations , claims and litigation may be higher or lower than the amounts accrued . for matters where a material loss is probable or reasonably possible and the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated , but the company is able to reasonably estimate a range of possible losses , such estimated range is required to be disclosed in these notes . this estimated range would be based on information currently available to the company and would involve elements of judgment and significant uncertainties . this estimated range of possible loss would not represent the company 2019s maximum possible loss exposure . for matters as to which the company is not able to reasonably estimate a possible loss or range of loss , the company is required to indicate the reasons why it is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss . for matters not specifically described in these notes , the company does not believe , based on information currently available to it , that it is reasonably possible that the liabilities , if any , arising from .
Question: what is the value of the long-term debt due after 2016?
Answer: 1305.0
Question: and what is the total long-term debt?
Answer: 1859.0
Question: how much, then, does that value represent in relation to this total?
Answer: 0.70199
Question: and for the long-term debt due in the years of 2010 and 2011, how much does the 2011 represent in relation to the 2010 one?
| 14.5625 |
CONVFINQA4374 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 167 the chart shows that for year ended december 31 , 2012 , the firm posted market risk related gains on 220 of the 261 days in this period , with gains on eight days exceeding $ 200 million . the chart includes year to date losses incurred in the synthetic credit portfolio . cib and credit portfolio posted market risk-related gains on 254 days in the period . the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which var exceeded the actual loss on each of those days . of the losses that were sustained on the 41 days of the 261 days in the trading period , the firm sustained losses that exceeded the var measure on three of those days . these losses in excess of the var all occurred in the second quarter of 2012 and were due to the adverse effect of market movements on risk positions in the synthetic credit portfolio held by cio . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , cib and credit portfolio experienced seven loss days ; none of the losses on those days exceeded their respective var measures . other risk measures debit valuation adjustment sensitivity the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads . this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve . however , the sensitivity at a single point in time multiplied by the change in credit spread at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual dva gain or loss realized within a period . the actual results reflect the movement in credit spreads across various maturities , which typically do not move in a parallel fashion , and is the product of a constantly changing exposure profile , among other factors . debit valuation adjustment sensitivity ( in millions ) one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>one basis-point increase injpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>$ 34</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>35</td></tr></table> economic-value stress testing along with var , stress testing is important in measuring and controlling risk . while var reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in markets using recent historical market behavior as an indicator of losses , stress testing captures the firm 2019s exposure to unlikely but plausible events in abnormal markets . the firm runs weekly stress tests on market-related risks across the lines of business using multiple scenarios that assume significant changes in risk factors such as credit spreads , equity prices , interest rates , currency rates or commodity prices . the framework uses a grid-based approach , which calculates multiple magnitudes of stress for both market rallies and market sell-offs for .
Question: what was the one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread in 2011?
| 35.0 |
CONVFINQA4375 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 167 the chart shows that for year ended december 31 , 2012 , the firm posted market risk related gains on 220 of the 261 days in this period , with gains on eight days exceeding $ 200 million . the chart includes year to date losses incurred in the synthetic credit portfolio . cib and credit portfolio posted market risk-related gains on 254 days in the period . the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which var exceeded the actual loss on each of those days . of the losses that were sustained on the 41 days of the 261 days in the trading period , the firm sustained losses that exceeded the var measure on three of those days . these losses in excess of the var all occurred in the second quarter of 2012 and were due to the adverse effect of market movements on risk positions in the synthetic credit portfolio held by cio . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , cib and credit portfolio experienced seven loss days ; none of the losses on those days exceeded their respective var measures . other risk measures debit valuation adjustment sensitivity the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads . this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve . however , the sensitivity at a single point in time multiplied by the change in credit spread at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual dva gain or loss realized within a period . the actual results reflect the movement in credit spreads across various maturities , which typically do not move in a parallel fashion , and is the product of a constantly changing exposure profile , among other factors . debit valuation adjustment sensitivity ( in millions ) one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>one basis-point increase injpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>$ 34</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>35</td></tr></table> economic-value stress testing along with var , stress testing is important in measuring and controlling risk . while var reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in markets using recent historical market behavior as an indicator of losses , stress testing captures the firm 2019s exposure to unlikely but plausible events in abnormal markets . the firm runs weekly stress tests on market-related risks across the lines of business using multiple scenarios that assume significant changes in risk factors such as credit spreads , equity prices , interest rates , currency rates or commodity prices . the framework uses a grid-based approach , which calculates multiple magnitudes of stress for both market rallies and market sell-offs for .
Question: what was the one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread in 2011?
Answer: 35.0
Question: what was the one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread in 2010?
| 34.0 |
CONVFINQA4376 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 167 the chart shows that for year ended december 31 , 2012 , the firm posted market risk related gains on 220 of the 261 days in this period , with gains on eight days exceeding $ 200 million . the chart includes year to date losses incurred in the synthetic credit portfolio . cib and credit portfolio posted market risk-related gains on 254 days in the period . the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which var exceeded the actual loss on each of those days . of the losses that were sustained on the 41 days of the 261 days in the trading period , the firm sustained losses that exceeded the var measure on three of those days . these losses in excess of the var all occurred in the second quarter of 2012 and were due to the adverse effect of market movements on risk positions in the synthetic credit portfolio held by cio . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , cib and credit portfolio experienced seven loss days ; none of the losses on those days exceeded their respective var measures . other risk measures debit valuation adjustment sensitivity the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads . this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve . however , the sensitivity at a single point in time multiplied by the change in credit spread at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual dva gain or loss realized within a period . the actual results reflect the movement in credit spreads across various maturities , which typically do not move in a parallel fashion , and is the product of a constantly changing exposure profile , among other factors . debit valuation adjustment sensitivity ( in millions ) one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>one basis-point increase injpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>$ 34</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>35</td></tr></table> economic-value stress testing along with var , stress testing is important in measuring and controlling risk . while var reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in markets using recent historical market behavior as an indicator of losses , stress testing captures the firm 2019s exposure to unlikely but plausible events in abnormal markets . the firm runs weekly stress tests on market-related risks across the lines of business using multiple scenarios that assume significant changes in risk factors such as credit spreads , equity prices , interest rates , currency rates or commodity prices . the framework uses a grid-based approach , which calculates multiple magnitudes of stress for both market rallies and market sell-offs for .
Question: what was the one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread in 2011?
Answer: 35.0
Question: what was the one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread in 2010?
Answer: 34.0
Question: what is the difference?
| 1.0 |
CONVFINQA4377 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 167 the chart shows that for year ended december 31 , 2012 , the firm posted market risk related gains on 220 of the 261 days in this period , with gains on eight days exceeding $ 200 million . the chart includes year to date losses incurred in the synthetic credit portfolio . cib and credit portfolio posted market risk-related gains on 254 days in the period . the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which var exceeded the actual loss on each of those days . of the losses that were sustained on the 41 days of the 261 days in the trading period , the firm sustained losses that exceeded the var measure on three of those days . these losses in excess of the var all occurred in the second quarter of 2012 and were due to the adverse effect of market movements on risk positions in the synthetic credit portfolio held by cio . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , cib and credit portfolio experienced seven loss days ; none of the losses on those days exceeded their respective var measures . other risk measures debit valuation adjustment sensitivity the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads . this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve . however , the sensitivity at a single point in time multiplied by the change in credit spread at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual dva gain or loss realized within a period . the actual results reflect the movement in credit spreads across various maturities , which typically do not move in a parallel fashion , and is the product of a constantly changing exposure profile , among other factors . debit valuation adjustment sensitivity ( in millions ) one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>one basis-point increase injpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>$ 34</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>35</td></tr></table> economic-value stress testing along with var , stress testing is important in measuring and controlling risk . while var reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in markets using recent historical market behavior as an indicator of losses , stress testing captures the firm 2019s exposure to unlikely but plausible events in abnormal markets . the firm runs weekly stress tests on market-related risks across the lines of business using multiple scenarios that assume significant changes in risk factors such as credit spreads , equity prices , interest rates , currency rates or commodity prices . the framework uses a grid-based approach , which calculates multiple magnitudes of stress for both market rallies and market sell-offs for .
Question: what was the one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread in 2011?
Answer: 35.0
Question: what was the one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread in 2010?
Answer: 34.0
Question: what is the difference?
Answer: 1.0
Question: what was the one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread in 2010?
| 34.0 |
CONVFINQA4378 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 167 the chart shows that for year ended december 31 , 2012 , the firm posted market risk related gains on 220 of the 261 days in this period , with gains on eight days exceeding $ 200 million . the chart includes year to date losses incurred in the synthetic credit portfolio . cib and credit portfolio posted market risk-related gains on 254 days in the period . the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which var exceeded the actual loss on each of those days . of the losses that were sustained on the 41 days of the 261 days in the trading period , the firm sustained losses that exceeded the var measure on three of those days . these losses in excess of the var all occurred in the second quarter of 2012 and were due to the adverse effect of market movements on risk positions in the synthetic credit portfolio held by cio . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , cib and credit portfolio experienced seven loss days ; none of the losses on those days exceeded their respective var measures . other risk measures debit valuation adjustment sensitivity the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads . this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve . however , the sensitivity at a single point in time multiplied by the change in credit spread at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual dva gain or loss realized within a period . the actual results reflect the movement in credit spreads across various maturities , which typically do not move in a parallel fashion , and is the product of a constantly changing exposure profile , among other factors . debit valuation adjustment sensitivity ( in millions ) one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>one basis-point increase injpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>$ 34</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>35</td></tr></table> economic-value stress testing along with var , stress testing is important in measuring and controlling risk . while var reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in markets using recent historical market behavior as an indicator of losses , stress testing captures the firm 2019s exposure to unlikely but plausible events in abnormal markets . the firm runs weekly stress tests on market-related risks across the lines of business using multiple scenarios that assume significant changes in risk factors such as credit spreads , equity prices , interest rates , currency rates or commodity prices . the framework uses a grid-based approach , which calculates multiple magnitudes of stress for both market rallies and market sell-offs for .
Question: what was the one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread in 2011?
Answer: 35.0
Question: what was the one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread in 2010?
Answer: 34.0
Question: what is the difference?
Answer: 1.0
Question: what was the one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread in 2010?
Answer: 34.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.02941 |
CONVFINQA4379 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents adobe inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the table below represents the preliminary purchase price allocation to the acquired net tangible and intangible assets of marketo based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date and the associated estimated useful lives at that date . the fair values assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on management 2019s best estimates and assumptions as of the reporting date and are considered preliminary pending finalization of valuation analyses pertaining to intangible assets acquired , deferred revenue and tax liabilities assumed including the calculation of deferred tax assets and liabilities . ( in thousands ) amount weighted average useful life ( years ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>amount</td><td>weighted average useful life ( years )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer contracts and relationships</td><td>$ 576900</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchased technology</td><td>444500</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>backlog</td><td>105800</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>non-competition agreements</td><td>12100</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>trademarks</td><td>328500</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total identifiable intangible assets</td><td>1467800</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net liabilities assumed</td><td>-191288 ( 191288 )</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>goodwill ( 1 )</td><td>3459751</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total estimated purchase price</td><td>$ 4736263</td><td>-</td></tr></table> _________________________________________ ( 1 ) non-deductible for tax-purposes . identifiable intangible assets 2014customer relationships consist of marketo 2019s contractual relationships and customer loyalty related to their enterprise and commercial customers as well as technology partner relationships . the estimated fair value of the customer contracts and relationships was determined based on projected cash flows attributable to the asset . purchased technology acquired primarily consists of marketo 2019s cloud-based engagement marketing software platform . the estimated fair value of the purchased technology was determined based on the expected future cost savings resulting from ownership of the asset . backlog relates to subscription contracts and professional services . non-compete agreements include agreements with key marketo employees that preclude them from competing against marketo for a period of two years from the acquisition date . trademarks include the marketo trade name , which is well known in the marketing ecosystem . we amortize the fair value of these intangible assets on a straight-line basis over their respective estimated useful lives . goodwill 2014approximately $ 3.46 billion has been allocated to goodwill , and has been allocated in full to the digital experience reportable segment . goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the underlying acquired net tangible and intangible assets . the factors that contributed to the recognition of goodwill included securing buyer-specific synergies that increase revenue and profits and are not otherwise available to a marketplace participant , acquiring a talented workforce and cost savings opportunities . net liabilities assumed 2014marketo 2019s tangible assets and liabilities as of october 31 , 2018 were reviewed and adjusted to their fair value as necessary . the net liabilities assumed included , among other items , $ 100.1 million in accrued expenses , $ 74.8 million in deferred revenue and $ 182.6 million in deferred tax liabilities , which were partially offset by $ 54.9 million in cash and cash equivalents and $ 72.4 million in trade receivables acquired . deferred revenue 2014included in net liabilities assumed is marketo 2019s deferred revenue which represents advance payments from customers related to subscription contracts and professional services . we estimated our obligation related to the deferred revenue using the cost build-up approach . the cost build-up approach determines fair value by estimating the direct and indirect costs related to supporting the obligation plus an assumed operating margin . the sum of the costs and assumed operating profit approximates , in theory , the amount that marketo would be required to pay a third party to assume the obligation . the estimated costs to fulfill the obligation were based on the near-term projected cost structure for subscription and professional services . as a result , we recorded an adjustment to reduce marketo 2019s carrying value of deferred revenue to $ 74.8 million , which represents our estimate of the fair value of the contractual obligations assumed based on a preliminary valuation. .
Question: what was the amount from the total estimated purchase price of goodwill?
| 3459751.0 |
CONVFINQA4380 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents adobe inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the table below represents the preliminary purchase price allocation to the acquired net tangible and intangible assets of marketo based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date and the associated estimated useful lives at that date . the fair values assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on management 2019s best estimates and assumptions as of the reporting date and are considered preliminary pending finalization of valuation analyses pertaining to intangible assets acquired , deferred revenue and tax liabilities assumed including the calculation of deferred tax assets and liabilities . ( in thousands ) amount weighted average useful life ( years ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>amount</td><td>weighted average useful life ( years )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer contracts and relationships</td><td>$ 576900</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchased technology</td><td>444500</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>backlog</td><td>105800</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>non-competition agreements</td><td>12100</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>trademarks</td><td>328500</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total identifiable intangible assets</td><td>1467800</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net liabilities assumed</td><td>-191288 ( 191288 )</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>goodwill ( 1 )</td><td>3459751</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total estimated purchase price</td><td>$ 4736263</td><td>-</td></tr></table> _________________________________________ ( 1 ) non-deductible for tax-purposes . identifiable intangible assets 2014customer relationships consist of marketo 2019s contractual relationships and customer loyalty related to their enterprise and commercial customers as well as technology partner relationships . the estimated fair value of the customer contracts and relationships was determined based on projected cash flows attributable to the asset . purchased technology acquired primarily consists of marketo 2019s cloud-based engagement marketing software platform . the estimated fair value of the purchased technology was determined based on the expected future cost savings resulting from ownership of the asset . backlog relates to subscription contracts and professional services . non-compete agreements include agreements with key marketo employees that preclude them from competing against marketo for a period of two years from the acquisition date . trademarks include the marketo trade name , which is well known in the marketing ecosystem . we amortize the fair value of these intangible assets on a straight-line basis over their respective estimated useful lives . goodwill 2014approximately $ 3.46 billion has been allocated to goodwill , and has been allocated in full to the digital experience reportable segment . goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the underlying acquired net tangible and intangible assets . the factors that contributed to the recognition of goodwill included securing buyer-specific synergies that increase revenue and profits and are not otherwise available to a marketplace participant , acquiring a talented workforce and cost savings opportunities . net liabilities assumed 2014marketo 2019s tangible assets and liabilities as of october 31 , 2018 were reviewed and adjusted to their fair value as necessary . the net liabilities assumed included , among other items , $ 100.1 million in accrued expenses , $ 74.8 million in deferred revenue and $ 182.6 million in deferred tax liabilities , which were partially offset by $ 54.9 million in cash and cash equivalents and $ 72.4 million in trade receivables acquired . deferred revenue 2014included in net liabilities assumed is marketo 2019s deferred revenue which represents advance payments from customers related to subscription contracts and professional services . we estimated our obligation related to the deferred revenue using the cost build-up approach . the cost build-up approach determines fair value by estimating the direct and indirect costs related to supporting the obligation plus an assumed operating margin . the sum of the costs and assumed operating profit approximates , in theory , the amount that marketo would be required to pay a third party to assume the obligation . the estimated costs to fulfill the obligation were based on the near-term projected cost structure for subscription and professional services . as a result , we recorded an adjustment to reduce marketo 2019s carrying value of deferred revenue to $ 74.8 million , which represents our estimate of the fair value of the contractual obligations assumed based on a preliminary valuation. .
Question: what was the amount from the total estimated purchase price of goodwill?
Answer: 3459751.0
Question: and what was that purchase price?
| 4736263.0 |
CONVFINQA4381 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents adobe inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the table below represents the preliminary purchase price allocation to the acquired net tangible and intangible assets of marketo based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date and the associated estimated useful lives at that date . the fair values assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on management 2019s best estimates and assumptions as of the reporting date and are considered preliminary pending finalization of valuation analyses pertaining to intangible assets acquired , deferred revenue and tax liabilities assumed including the calculation of deferred tax assets and liabilities . ( in thousands ) amount weighted average useful life ( years ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>amount</td><td>weighted average useful life ( years )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer contracts and relationships</td><td>$ 576900</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchased technology</td><td>444500</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>backlog</td><td>105800</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>non-competition agreements</td><td>12100</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>trademarks</td><td>328500</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total identifiable intangible assets</td><td>1467800</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net liabilities assumed</td><td>-191288 ( 191288 )</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>goodwill ( 1 )</td><td>3459751</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total estimated purchase price</td><td>$ 4736263</td><td>-</td></tr></table> _________________________________________ ( 1 ) non-deductible for tax-purposes . identifiable intangible assets 2014customer relationships consist of marketo 2019s contractual relationships and customer loyalty related to their enterprise and commercial customers as well as technology partner relationships . the estimated fair value of the customer contracts and relationships was determined based on projected cash flows attributable to the asset . purchased technology acquired primarily consists of marketo 2019s cloud-based engagement marketing software platform . the estimated fair value of the purchased technology was determined based on the expected future cost savings resulting from ownership of the asset . backlog relates to subscription contracts and professional services . non-compete agreements include agreements with key marketo employees that preclude them from competing against marketo for a period of two years from the acquisition date . trademarks include the marketo trade name , which is well known in the marketing ecosystem . we amortize the fair value of these intangible assets on a straight-line basis over their respective estimated useful lives . goodwill 2014approximately $ 3.46 billion has been allocated to goodwill , and has been allocated in full to the digital experience reportable segment . goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the underlying acquired net tangible and intangible assets . the factors that contributed to the recognition of goodwill included securing buyer-specific synergies that increase revenue and profits and are not otherwise available to a marketplace participant , acquiring a talented workforce and cost savings opportunities . net liabilities assumed 2014marketo 2019s tangible assets and liabilities as of october 31 , 2018 were reviewed and adjusted to their fair value as necessary . the net liabilities assumed included , among other items , $ 100.1 million in accrued expenses , $ 74.8 million in deferred revenue and $ 182.6 million in deferred tax liabilities , which were partially offset by $ 54.9 million in cash and cash equivalents and $ 72.4 million in trade receivables acquired . deferred revenue 2014included in net liabilities assumed is marketo 2019s deferred revenue which represents advance payments from customers related to subscription contracts and professional services . we estimated our obligation related to the deferred revenue using the cost build-up approach . the cost build-up approach determines fair value by estimating the direct and indirect costs related to supporting the obligation plus an assumed operating margin . the sum of the costs and assumed operating profit approximates , in theory , the amount that marketo would be required to pay a third party to assume the obligation . the estimated costs to fulfill the obligation were based on the near-term projected cost structure for subscription and professional services . as a result , we recorded an adjustment to reduce marketo 2019s carrying value of deferred revenue to $ 74.8 million , which represents our estimate of the fair value of the contractual obligations assumed based on a preliminary valuation. .
Question: what was the amount from the total estimated purchase price of goodwill?
Answer: 3459751.0
Question: and what was that purchase price?
Answer: 4736263.0
Question: what portion, then of this price did that amount represent?
| 0.73048 |
CONVFINQA4382 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents adobe inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the table below represents the preliminary purchase price allocation to the acquired net tangible and intangible assets of marketo based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date and the associated estimated useful lives at that date . the fair values assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on management 2019s best estimates and assumptions as of the reporting date and are considered preliminary pending finalization of valuation analyses pertaining to intangible assets acquired , deferred revenue and tax liabilities assumed including the calculation of deferred tax assets and liabilities . ( in thousands ) amount weighted average useful life ( years ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>amount</td><td>weighted average useful life ( years )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer contracts and relationships</td><td>$ 576900</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchased technology</td><td>444500</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>backlog</td><td>105800</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>non-competition agreements</td><td>12100</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>trademarks</td><td>328500</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total identifiable intangible assets</td><td>1467800</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net liabilities assumed</td><td>-191288 ( 191288 )</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>goodwill ( 1 )</td><td>3459751</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total estimated purchase price</td><td>$ 4736263</td><td>-</td></tr></table> _________________________________________ ( 1 ) non-deductible for tax-purposes . identifiable intangible assets 2014customer relationships consist of marketo 2019s contractual relationships and customer loyalty related to their enterprise and commercial customers as well as technology partner relationships . the estimated fair value of the customer contracts and relationships was determined based on projected cash flows attributable to the asset . purchased technology acquired primarily consists of marketo 2019s cloud-based engagement marketing software platform . the estimated fair value of the purchased technology was determined based on the expected future cost savings resulting from ownership of the asset . backlog relates to subscription contracts and professional services . non-compete agreements include agreements with key marketo employees that preclude them from competing against marketo for a period of two years from the acquisition date . trademarks include the marketo trade name , which is well known in the marketing ecosystem . we amortize the fair value of these intangible assets on a straight-line basis over their respective estimated useful lives . goodwill 2014approximately $ 3.46 billion has been allocated to goodwill , and has been allocated in full to the digital experience reportable segment . goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the underlying acquired net tangible and intangible assets . the factors that contributed to the recognition of goodwill included securing buyer-specific synergies that increase revenue and profits and are not otherwise available to a marketplace participant , acquiring a talented workforce and cost savings opportunities . net liabilities assumed 2014marketo 2019s tangible assets and liabilities as of october 31 , 2018 were reviewed and adjusted to their fair value as necessary . the net liabilities assumed included , among other items , $ 100.1 million in accrued expenses , $ 74.8 million in deferred revenue and $ 182.6 million in deferred tax liabilities , which were partially offset by $ 54.9 million in cash and cash equivalents and $ 72.4 million in trade receivables acquired . deferred revenue 2014included in net liabilities assumed is marketo 2019s deferred revenue which represents advance payments from customers related to subscription contracts and professional services . we estimated our obligation related to the deferred revenue using the cost build-up approach . the cost build-up approach determines fair value by estimating the direct and indirect costs related to supporting the obligation plus an assumed operating margin . the sum of the costs and assumed operating profit approximates , in theory , the amount that marketo would be required to pay a third party to assume the obligation . the estimated costs to fulfill the obligation were based on the near-term projected cost structure for subscription and professional services . as a result , we recorded an adjustment to reduce marketo 2019s carrying value of deferred revenue to $ 74.8 million , which represents our estimate of the fair value of the contractual obligations assumed based on a preliminary valuation. .
Question: what was the amount from the total estimated purchase price of goodwill?
Answer: 3459751.0
Question: and what was that purchase price?
Answer: 4736263.0
Question: what portion, then of this price did that amount represent?
Answer: 0.73048
Question: and concerning the trademarks segment, what was its estimated annual amortization expense?
| 36500.0 |
CONVFINQA4383 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information our common stock has been traded on the new york stock exchange ( 2018 2018nyse 2019 2019 ) under the symbol 2018 2018exr 2019 2019 since our ipo on august 17 , 2004 . prior to that time there was no public market for our common stock . the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low bid price for our common stock as reported by the nyse and the per share dividends declared : dividends high low declared . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>high</td><td>low</td><td>dividends declared</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>period from august 17 2004 to september 30 2004</td><td>$ 14.38</td><td>$ 12.50</td><td>$ 0.1113</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended december 31 2004</td><td>14.55</td><td>12.60</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended march 31 2005</td><td>14.30</td><td>12.55</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended june 30 2005</td><td>14.75</td><td>12.19</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>quarter ended september 30 2005</td><td>16.71</td><td>14.32</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended december 31 2005</td><td>15.90</td><td>13.00</td><td>0.2275</td></tr></table> on february 28 , 2006 , the closing price of our common stock as reported by the nyse was $ 15.00 . at february 28 , 2006 , we had 166 holders of record of our common stock . holders of shares of common stock are entitled to receive distributions when declared by our board of directors out of any assets legally available for that purpose . as a reit , we are required to distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our 2018 2018reit taxable income 2019 2019 is generally equivalent to our net taxable ordinary income , determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid , to our stockholders annually in order to maintain our reit qualifications for u.s . federal income tax purposes . unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds on june 20 , 2005 , we completed the sale of 6200000 shares of our common stock , $ .01 par value , for $ 83514 , which we reported in a current report on form 8-k filed with the securities and exchange commission on june 24 , 2005 . we used the proceeds for general corporate purposes , including debt repayment . the shares were issued pursuant to an exemption from registration under the securities act of 1933 , as amended. .
Question: what was the net change in value of the high bid price for the quarter ended december 31, 2004 and the quarter ended march 31, 2005?
| -0.25 |
CONVFINQA4384 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information our common stock has been traded on the new york stock exchange ( 2018 2018nyse 2019 2019 ) under the symbol 2018 2018exr 2019 2019 since our ipo on august 17 , 2004 . prior to that time there was no public market for our common stock . the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low bid price for our common stock as reported by the nyse and the per share dividends declared : dividends high low declared . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>high</td><td>low</td><td>dividends declared</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>period from august 17 2004 to september 30 2004</td><td>$ 14.38</td><td>$ 12.50</td><td>$ 0.1113</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended december 31 2004</td><td>14.55</td><td>12.60</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended march 31 2005</td><td>14.30</td><td>12.55</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended june 30 2005</td><td>14.75</td><td>12.19</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>quarter ended september 30 2005</td><td>16.71</td><td>14.32</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended december 31 2005</td><td>15.90</td><td>13.00</td><td>0.2275</td></tr></table> on february 28 , 2006 , the closing price of our common stock as reported by the nyse was $ 15.00 . at february 28 , 2006 , we had 166 holders of record of our common stock . holders of shares of common stock are entitled to receive distributions when declared by our board of directors out of any assets legally available for that purpose . as a reit , we are required to distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our 2018 2018reit taxable income 2019 2019 is generally equivalent to our net taxable ordinary income , determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid , to our stockholders annually in order to maintain our reit qualifications for u.s . federal income tax purposes . unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds on june 20 , 2005 , we completed the sale of 6200000 shares of our common stock , $ .01 par value , for $ 83514 , which we reported in a current report on form 8-k filed with the securities and exchange commission on june 24 , 2005 . we used the proceeds for general corporate purposes , including debt repayment . the shares were issued pursuant to an exemption from registration under the securities act of 1933 , as amended. .
Question: what was the net change in value of the high bid price for the quarter ended december 31, 2004 and the quarter ended march 31, 2005?
Answer: -0.25
Question: what is the percent change?
| -0.01718 |
CONVFINQA4385 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
31 , 2015 , the price was r$ 218/mwh . after the expiration of contract with eletropaulo , tiet ea's strategy is to contract most of its physical guarantee , as described in regulatory framework section below , and sell the remaining portion in the spot market . tiet ea's strategy is reassessed from time to time according to changes in market conditions , hydrology and other factors . tiet ea has been continuously selling its available energy from 2016 forward through medium-term bilateral contracts of three to five years . as of december 31 , 2016 , tiet ea's contracted portfolio position is 95% ( 95 % ) and 88% ( 88 % ) with average prices of r$ 157/ mwh and r$ 159/mwh ( inflation adjusted until december 2016 ) for 2016 and 2017 , respectively . as brazil is mostly a hydro-based country with energy prices highly tied to the hydrological situation , the deterioration of the hydrology since the beginning of 2014 caused an increase in energy prices going forward . tiet ea is closely monitoring and analyzing system supply conditions to support energy commercialization decisions . under the concession agreement , tiet ea has an obligation to increase its capacity by 15% ( 15 % ) . tiet ea , as well as other concession generators , have not yet met this requirement due to regulatory , environmental , hydrological and fuel constraints . the state of s e3o paulo does not have a sufficient potential for wind power and only has a small remaining potential for hydro projects . as such , the capacity increases in the state will mostly be derived from thermal gas capacity projects . due to the highly complex process to obtain an environmental license for coal projects , tiet ea decided to fulfill its obligation with gas-fired projects in line with the federal government plans . petrobras refuses to supply natural gas and to offer capacity in its pipelines and regasification terminals . therefore , there are no regulations for natural gas swaps in place , and it is unfeasible to bring natural gas to aes tiet ea . a legal case has been initiated by the state of s e3o paulo requiring the investment to be performed . tiet ea is in the process of analyzing options to meet the obligation . uruguaiana is a 640 mw gas-fired combined cycle power plant located in the town of uruguaiana in the state of rio grande do sul , commissioned in december 2000 . aes manages and has a 46% ( 46 % ) economic interest in the plant with the remaining interest held by bndes . the plant's operations were suspended in april 2009 due to the unavailability of gas . aes has evaluated several alternatives to bring gas supply on a competitive basis to uruguaiana . one of the challenges is the capacity restrictions on the argentinean pipeline , especially during the winter season when gas demand in argentina is very high . the plant operated on a short-term basis during february and march 2013 , march through may 2014 , and february through may 2015 due to the short-term supply of lng for the facility . the plant did not operate in 2016 . uruguaiana continues to work toward securing gas on a long-term basis . market structure 2014 brazil has installed capacity of 150136 mw , which is 65% ( 65 % ) hydroelectric , 19% ( 19 % ) thermal and 16% ( 16 % ) renewable ( biomass and wind ) . brazil's national grid is divided into four subsystems . tiet ea is in the southeast and uruguaiana is in the south subsystems of the national grid . regulatory framework 2014 in brazil , the ministry of mines and energy determines the maximum amount of energy that a plant can sell , called physical guarantee , which represents the long-term average expected energy production of the plant . under current rules , physical guarantee can be sold to distribution companies through long- term regulated auctions or under unregulated bilateral contracts with large consumers or energy trading companies . the national system operator ( "ons" ) is responsible for coordinating and controlling the operation of the national grid . the ons dispatches generators based on hydrological conditions , reservoir levels , electricity demand and the prices of fuel and thermal generation . given the importance of hydro generation in the country , the ons sometimes reduces dispatch of hydro facilities and increases dispatch of thermal facilities to protect reservoir levels in the system . in brazil , the system operator controls all hydroelectric generation dispatch and reservoir levels . a mechanism known as the energy reallocation mechanism ( "mre" ) was created to share hydrological risk across mre hydro generators . if the hydro plants generate less than the total mre physical guarantee , the hydro generators may need to purchase energy in the short-term market to fulfill their contract obligations . when total hydro generation is higher than the total mre physical guarantee , the surplus is proportionally shared among its participants and they are able to make extra revenue selling the excess energy on the spot market . the consequences of unfavorable hydrology are ( i ) thermal plants more expensive to the system being dispatched , ( ii ) lower hydropower generation with deficits in the mre and ( iii ) high spot prices . aneel defines the spot price cap for electricity in the brazilian market . the spot price caps as defined by aneel and average spot prices by calendar year are as follows ( r$ / . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>spot price cap as defined by aneel</td><td>534</td><td>423</td><td>388</td><td>822</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average spot rate</td><td>-</td><td>94</td><td>287</td><td>689</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the difference in the average spot rate between 2015 and 2016?
| -193.0 |
CONVFINQA4386 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
31 , 2015 , the price was r$ 218/mwh . after the expiration of contract with eletropaulo , tiet ea's strategy is to contract most of its physical guarantee , as described in regulatory framework section below , and sell the remaining portion in the spot market . tiet ea's strategy is reassessed from time to time according to changes in market conditions , hydrology and other factors . tiet ea has been continuously selling its available energy from 2016 forward through medium-term bilateral contracts of three to five years . as of december 31 , 2016 , tiet ea's contracted portfolio position is 95% ( 95 % ) and 88% ( 88 % ) with average prices of r$ 157/ mwh and r$ 159/mwh ( inflation adjusted until december 2016 ) for 2016 and 2017 , respectively . as brazil is mostly a hydro-based country with energy prices highly tied to the hydrological situation , the deterioration of the hydrology since the beginning of 2014 caused an increase in energy prices going forward . tiet ea is closely monitoring and analyzing system supply conditions to support energy commercialization decisions . under the concession agreement , tiet ea has an obligation to increase its capacity by 15% ( 15 % ) . tiet ea , as well as other concession generators , have not yet met this requirement due to regulatory , environmental , hydrological and fuel constraints . the state of s e3o paulo does not have a sufficient potential for wind power and only has a small remaining potential for hydro projects . as such , the capacity increases in the state will mostly be derived from thermal gas capacity projects . due to the highly complex process to obtain an environmental license for coal projects , tiet ea decided to fulfill its obligation with gas-fired projects in line with the federal government plans . petrobras refuses to supply natural gas and to offer capacity in its pipelines and regasification terminals . therefore , there are no regulations for natural gas swaps in place , and it is unfeasible to bring natural gas to aes tiet ea . a legal case has been initiated by the state of s e3o paulo requiring the investment to be performed . tiet ea is in the process of analyzing options to meet the obligation . uruguaiana is a 640 mw gas-fired combined cycle power plant located in the town of uruguaiana in the state of rio grande do sul , commissioned in december 2000 . aes manages and has a 46% ( 46 % ) economic interest in the plant with the remaining interest held by bndes . the plant's operations were suspended in april 2009 due to the unavailability of gas . aes has evaluated several alternatives to bring gas supply on a competitive basis to uruguaiana . one of the challenges is the capacity restrictions on the argentinean pipeline , especially during the winter season when gas demand in argentina is very high . the plant operated on a short-term basis during february and march 2013 , march through may 2014 , and february through may 2015 due to the short-term supply of lng for the facility . the plant did not operate in 2016 . uruguaiana continues to work toward securing gas on a long-term basis . market structure 2014 brazil has installed capacity of 150136 mw , which is 65% ( 65 % ) hydroelectric , 19% ( 19 % ) thermal and 16% ( 16 % ) renewable ( biomass and wind ) . brazil's national grid is divided into four subsystems . tiet ea is in the southeast and uruguaiana is in the south subsystems of the national grid . regulatory framework 2014 in brazil , the ministry of mines and energy determines the maximum amount of energy that a plant can sell , called physical guarantee , which represents the long-term average expected energy production of the plant . under current rules , physical guarantee can be sold to distribution companies through long- term regulated auctions or under unregulated bilateral contracts with large consumers or energy trading companies . the national system operator ( "ons" ) is responsible for coordinating and controlling the operation of the national grid . the ons dispatches generators based on hydrological conditions , reservoir levels , electricity demand and the prices of fuel and thermal generation . given the importance of hydro generation in the country , the ons sometimes reduces dispatch of hydro facilities and increases dispatch of thermal facilities to protect reservoir levels in the system . in brazil , the system operator controls all hydroelectric generation dispatch and reservoir levels . a mechanism known as the energy reallocation mechanism ( "mre" ) was created to share hydrological risk across mre hydro generators . if the hydro plants generate less than the total mre physical guarantee , the hydro generators may need to purchase energy in the short-term market to fulfill their contract obligations . when total hydro generation is higher than the total mre physical guarantee , the surplus is proportionally shared among its participants and they are able to make extra revenue selling the excess energy on the spot market . the consequences of unfavorable hydrology are ( i ) thermal plants more expensive to the system being dispatched , ( ii ) lower hydropower generation with deficits in the mre and ( iii ) high spot prices . aneel defines the spot price cap for electricity in the brazilian market . the spot price caps as defined by aneel and average spot prices by calendar year are as follows ( r$ / . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>spot price cap as defined by aneel</td><td>534</td><td>423</td><td>388</td><td>822</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average spot rate</td><td>-</td><td>94</td><td>287</td><td>689</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the difference in the average spot rate between 2015 and 2016?
Answer: -193.0
Question: what was the average spot rate in 2015?
| 287.0 |
CONVFINQA4387 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
31 , 2015 , the price was r$ 218/mwh . after the expiration of contract with eletropaulo , tiet ea's strategy is to contract most of its physical guarantee , as described in regulatory framework section below , and sell the remaining portion in the spot market . tiet ea's strategy is reassessed from time to time according to changes in market conditions , hydrology and other factors . tiet ea has been continuously selling its available energy from 2016 forward through medium-term bilateral contracts of three to five years . as of december 31 , 2016 , tiet ea's contracted portfolio position is 95% ( 95 % ) and 88% ( 88 % ) with average prices of r$ 157/ mwh and r$ 159/mwh ( inflation adjusted until december 2016 ) for 2016 and 2017 , respectively . as brazil is mostly a hydro-based country with energy prices highly tied to the hydrological situation , the deterioration of the hydrology since the beginning of 2014 caused an increase in energy prices going forward . tiet ea is closely monitoring and analyzing system supply conditions to support energy commercialization decisions . under the concession agreement , tiet ea has an obligation to increase its capacity by 15% ( 15 % ) . tiet ea , as well as other concession generators , have not yet met this requirement due to regulatory , environmental , hydrological and fuel constraints . the state of s e3o paulo does not have a sufficient potential for wind power and only has a small remaining potential for hydro projects . as such , the capacity increases in the state will mostly be derived from thermal gas capacity projects . due to the highly complex process to obtain an environmental license for coal projects , tiet ea decided to fulfill its obligation with gas-fired projects in line with the federal government plans . petrobras refuses to supply natural gas and to offer capacity in its pipelines and regasification terminals . therefore , there are no regulations for natural gas swaps in place , and it is unfeasible to bring natural gas to aes tiet ea . a legal case has been initiated by the state of s e3o paulo requiring the investment to be performed . tiet ea is in the process of analyzing options to meet the obligation . uruguaiana is a 640 mw gas-fired combined cycle power plant located in the town of uruguaiana in the state of rio grande do sul , commissioned in december 2000 . aes manages and has a 46% ( 46 % ) economic interest in the plant with the remaining interest held by bndes . the plant's operations were suspended in april 2009 due to the unavailability of gas . aes has evaluated several alternatives to bring gas supply on a competitive basis to uruguaiana . one of the challenges is the capacity restrictions on the argentinean pipeline , especially during the winter season when gas demand in argentina is very high . the plant operated on a short-term basis during february and march 2013 , march through may 2014 , and february through may 2015 due to the short-term supply of lng for the facility . the plant did not operate in 2016 . uruguaiana continues to work toward securing gas on a long-term basis . market structure 2014 brazil has installed capacity of 150136 mw , which is 65% ( 65 % ) hydroelectric , 19% ( 19 % ) thermal and 16% ( 16 % ) renewable ( biomass and wind ) . brazil's national grid is divided into four subsystems . tiet ea is in the southeast and uruguaiana is in the south subsystems of the national grid . regulatory framework 2014 in brazil , the ministry of mines and energy determines the maximum amount of energy that a plant can sell , called physical guarantee , which represents the long-term average expected energy production of the plant . under current rules , physical guarantee can be sold to distribution companies through long- term regulated auctions or under unregulated bilateral contracts with large consumers or energy trading companies . the national system operator ( "ons" ) is responsible for coordinating and controlling the operation of the national grid . the ons dispatches generators based on hydrological conditions , reservoir levels , electricity demand and the prices of fuel and thermal generation . given the importance of hydro generation in the country , the ons sometimes reduces dispatch of hydro facilities and increases dispatch of thermal facilities to protect reservoir levels in the system . in brazil , the system operator controls all hydroelectric generation dispatch and reservoir levels . a mechanism known as the energy reallocation mechanism ( "mre" ) was created to share hydrological risk across mre hydro generators . if the hydro plants generate less than the total mre physical guarantee , the hydro generators may need to purchase energy in the short-term market to fulfill their contract obligations . when total hydro generation is higher than the total mre physical guarantee , the surplus is proportionally shared among its participants and they are able to make extra revenue selling the excess energy on the spot market . the consequences of unfavorable hydrology are ( i ) thermal plants more expensive to the system being dispatched , ( ii ) lower hydropower generation with deficits in the mre and ( iii ) high spot prices . aneel defines the spot price cap for electricity in the brazilian market . the spot price caps as defined by aneel and average spot prices by calendar year are as follows ( r$ / . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>spot price cap as defined by aneel</td><td>534</td><td>423</td><td>388</td><td>822</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average spot rate</td><td>-</td><td>94</td><td>287</td><td>689</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the difference in the average spot rate between 2015 and 2016?
Answer: -193.0
Question: what was the average spot rate in 2015?
Answer: 287.0
Question: what was the percent change?
| -0.67247 |
CONVFINQA4388 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
distribution xpedx , our north american merchant distribution business , distributes products and services to a number of customer markets including : commercial printers with printing papers and graphic pre-press , printing presses and post-press equipment ; building services and away-from-home markets with facility supplies ; manufacturers with packaging supplies and equipment ; and to a growing number of customers , we exclusively provide distribution capabilities including warehousing and delivery services . xpedx is the leading wholesale distribution marketer in these customer and product segments in north america , operating 122 warehouse locations and 130 retail stores in the united states , mexico and cana- forest products international paper owns and manages approx- imately 200000 acres of forestlands and develop- ment properties in the united states , mostly in the south . our remaining forestlands are managed as a portfolio to optimize the economic value to our shareholders . most of our portfolio represents prop- erties that are likely to be sold to investors and other buyers for various purposes . specialty businesses and other chemicals : this business was sold in the first quarter of 2007 . ilim holding s.a . in october 2007 , international paper and ilim holding s.a . ( ilim ) completed a 50:50 joint venture to operate a pulp and paper business located in russia . ilim 2019s facilities include three paper mills located in bratsk , ust-ilimsk , and koryazhma , russia , with combined total pulp and paper capacity of over 2.5 million tons . ilim has exclusive harvesting rights on timberland and forest areas exceeding 12.8 million acres ( 5.2 million hectares ) . products and brand designations appearing in italics are trademarks of international paper or a related company . industry segment results industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods pro- duction , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing effi- ciency and product mix . industrial packaging results for 2009 and 2008 include the cbpr business acquired in the 2008 third quarter . net sales for 2009 increased 16% ( 16 % ) to $ 8.9 billion compared with $ 7.7 billion in 2008 , and 69% ( 69 % ) compared with $ 5.2 billion in 2007 . operating profits were 95% ( 95 % ) higher in 2009 than in 2008 and more than double 2007 levels . benefits from higher total year-over-year shipments , including the impact of the cbpr business , ( $ 11 million ) , favorable operating costs ( $ 294 million ) , and lower raw material and freight costs ( $ 295 million ) were parti- ally offset by the effects of lower price realizations ( $ 243 million ) , higher corporate overhead allocations ( $ 85 million ) , incremental integration costs asso- ciated with the acquisition of the cbpr business ( $ 3 million ) and higher other costs ( $ 7 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2009 included a gain of $ 849 million relating to alternative fuel mix- ture credits , u.s . plant closure costs of $ 653 million , and costs associated with the shutdown of the eti- enne mill in france of $ 87 million . industrial packaging in millions 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 8890</td><td>$ 7690</td><td>$ 5245</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>761</td><td>390</td><td>374</td></tr></table> north american industrial packaging results include the net sales and operating profits of the cbpr business from the august 4 , 2008 acquis- ition date . net sales were $ 7.6 billion in 2009 com- pared with $ 6.2 billion in 2008 and $ 3.9 billion in 2007 . operating profits in 2009 were $ 791 million ( $ 682 million excluding alternative fuel mixture cred- its , mill closure costs and costs associated with the cbpr integration ) compared with $ 322 million ( $ 414 million excluding charges related to the write-up of cbpr inventory to fair value , cbpr integration costs and other facility closure costs ) in 2008 and $ 305 million in 2007 . excluding the effect of the cbpr acquisition , con- tainerboard and box shipments were lower in 2009 compared with 2008 reflecting weaker customer demand . average sales price realizations were sig- nificantly lower for both containerboard and boxes due to weaker world-wide economic conditions . however , average sales margins for boxes .
Question: what was the total of industrial packaging sales in 2009?
| 8890.0 |
CONVFINQA4389 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
distribution xpedx , our north american merchant distribution business , distributes products and services to a number of customer markets including : commercial printers with printing papers and graphic pre-press , printing presses and post-press equipment ; building services and away-from-home markets with facility supplies ; manufacturers with packaging supplies and equipment ; and to a growing number of customers , we exclusively provide distribution capabilities including warehousing and delivery services . xpedx is the leading wholesale distribution marketer in these customer and product segments in north america , operating 122 warehouse locations and 130 retail stores in the united states , mexico and cana- forest products international paper owns and manages approx- imately 200000 acres of forestlands and develop- ment properties in the united states , mostly in the south . our remaining forestlands are managed as a portfolio to optimize the economic value to our shareholders . most of our portfolio represents prop- erties that are likely to be sold to investors and other buyers for various purposes . specialty businesses and other chemicals : this business was sold in the first quarter of 2007 . ilim holding s.a . in october 2007 , international paper and ilim holding s.a . ( ilim ) completed a 50:50 joint venture to operate a pulp and paper business located in russia . ilim 2019s facilities include three paper mills located in bratsk , ust-ilimsk , and koryazhma , russia , with combined total pulp and paper capacity of over 2.5 million tons . ilim has exclusive harvesting rights on timberland and forest areas exceeding 12.8 million acres ( 5.2 million hectares ) . products and brand designations appearing in italics are trademarks of international paper or a related company . industry segment results industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods pro- duction , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing effi- ciency and product mix . industrial packaging results for 2009 and 2008 include the cbpr business acquired in the 2008 third quarter . net sales for 2009 increased 16% ( 16 % ) to $ 8.9 billion compared with $ 7.7 billion in 2008 , and 69% ( 69 % ) compared with $ 5.2 billion in 2007 . operating profits were 95% ( 95 % ) higher in 2009 than in 2008 and more than double 2007 levels . benefits from higher total year-over-year shipments , including the impact of the cbpr business , ( $ 11 million ) , favorable operating costs ( $ 294 million ) , and lower raw material and freight costs ( $ 295 million ) were parti- ally offset by the effects of lower price realizations ( $ 243 million ) , higher corporate overhead allocations ( $ 85 million ) , incremental integration costs asso- ciated with the acquisition of the cbpr business ( $ 3 million ) and higher other costs ( $ 7 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2009 included a gain of $ 849 million relating to alternative fuel mix- ture credits , u.s . plant closure costs of $ 653 million , and costs associated with the shutdown of the eti- enne mill in france of $ 87 million . industrial packaging in millions 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 8890</td><td>$ 7690</td><td>$ 5245</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>761</td><td>390</td><td>374</td></tr></table> north american industrial packaging results include the net sales and operating profits of the cbpr business from the august 4 , 2008 acquis- ition date . net sales were $ 7.6 billion in 2009 com- pared with $ 6.2 billion in 2008 and $ 3.9 billion in 2007 . operating profits in 2009 were $ 791 million ( $ 682 million excluding alternative fuel mixture cred- its , mill closure costs and costs associated with the cbpr integration ) compared with $ 322 million ( $ 414 million excluding charges related to the write-up of cbpr inventory to fair value , cbpr integration costs and other facility closure costs ) in 2008 and $ 305 million in 2007 . excluding the effect of the cbpr acquisition , con- tainerboard and box shipments were lower in 2009 compared with 2008 reflecting weaker customer demand . average sales price realizations were sig- nificantly lower for both containerboard and boxes due to weaker world-wide economic conditions . however , average sales margins for boxes .
Question: what was the total of industrial packaging sales in 2009?
Answer: 8890.0
Question: and what was it in 2008?
| 7690.0 |
CONVFINQA4390 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
distribution xpedx , our north american merchant distribution business , distributes products and services to a number of customer markets including : commercial printers with printing papers and graphic pre-press , printing presses and post-press equipment ; building services and away-from-home markets with facility supplies ; manufacturers with packaging supplies and equipment ; and to a growing number of customers , we exclusively provide distribution capabilities including warehousing and delivery services . xpedx is the leading wholesale distribution marketer in these customer and product segments in north america , operating 122 warehouse locations and 130 retail stores in the united states , mexico and cana- forest products international paper owns and manages approx- imately 200000 acres of forestlands and develop- ment properties in the united states , mostly in the south . our remaining forestlands are managed as a portfolio to optimize the economic value to our shareholders . most of our portfolio represents prop- erties that are likely to be sold to investors and other buyers for various purposes . specialty businesses and other chemicals : this business was sold in the first quarter of 2007 . ilim holding s.a . in october 2007 , international paper and ilim holding s.a . ( ilim ) completed a 50:50 joint venture to operate a pulp and paper business located in russia . ilim 2019s facilities include three paper mills located in bratsk , ust-ilimsk , and koryazhma , russia , with combined total pulp and paper capacity of over 2.5 million tons . ilim has exclusive harvesting rights on timberland and forest areas exceeding 12.8 million acres ( 5.2 million hectares ) . products and brand designations appearing in italics are trademarks of international paper or a related company . industry segment results industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods pro- duction , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing effi- ciency and product mix . industrial packaging results for 2009 and 2008 include the cbpr business acquired in the 2008 third quarter . net sales for 2009 increased 16% ( 16 % ) to $ 8.9 billion compared with $ 7.7 billion in 2008 , and 69% ( 69 % ) compared with $ 5.2 billion in 2007 . operating profits were 95% ( 95 % ) higher in 2009 than in 2008 and more than double 2007 levels . benefits from higher total year-over-year shipments , including the impact of the cbpr business , ( $ 11 million ) , favorable operating costs ( $ 294 million ) , and lower raw material and freight costs ( $ 295 million ) were parti- ally offset by the effects of lower price realizations ( $ 243 million ) , higher corporate overhead allocations ( $ 85 million ) , incremental integration costs asso- ciated with the acquisition of the cbpr business ( $ 3 million ) and higher other costs ( $ 7 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2009 included a gain of $ 849 million relating to alternative fuel mix- ture credits , u.s . plant closure costs of $ 653 million , and costs associated with the shutdown of the eti- enne mill in france of $ 87 million . industrial packaging in millions 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 8890</td><td>$ 7690</td><td>$ 5245</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>761</td><td>390</td><td>374</td></tr></table> north american industrial packaging results include the net sales and operating profits of the cbpr business from the august 4 , 2008 acquis- ition date . net sales were $ 7.6 billion in 2009 com- pared with $ 6.2 billion in 2008 and $ 3.9 billion in 2007 . operating profits in 2009 were $ 791 million ( $ 682 million excluding alternative fuel mixture cred- its , mill closure costs and costs associated with the cbpr integration ) compared with $ 322 million ( $ 414 million excluding charges related to the write-up of cbpr inventory to fair value , cbpr integration costs and other facility closure costs ) in 2008 and $ 305 million in 2007 . excluding the effect of the cbpr acquisition , con- tainerboard and box shipments were lower in 2009 compared with 2008 reflecting weaker customer demand . average sales price realizations were sig- nificantly lower for both containerboard and boxes due to weaker world-wide economic conditions . however , average sales margins for boxes .
Question: what was the total of industrial packaging sales in 2009?
Answer: 8890.0
Question: and what was it in 2008?
Answer: 7690.0
Question: by how much, then, did it increase over the year?
| 1200.0 |
CONVFINQA4391 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
distribution xpedx , our north american merchant distribution business , distributes products and services to a number of customer markets including : commercial printers with printing papers and graphic pre-press , printing presses and post-press equipment ; building services and away-from-home markets with facility supplies ; manufacturers with packaging supplies and equipment ; and to a growing number of customers , we exclusively provide distribution capabilities including warehousing and delivery services . xpedx is the leading wholesale distribution marketer in these customer and product segments in north america , operating 122 warehouse locations and 130 retail stores in the united states , mexico and cana- forest products international paper owns and manages approx- imately 200000 acres of forestlands and develop- ment properties in the united states , mostly in the south . our remaining forestlands are managed as a portfolio to optimize the economic value to our shareholders . most of our portfolio represents prop- erties that are likely to be sold to investors and other buyers for various purposes . specialty businesses and other chemicals : this business was sold in the first quarter of 2007 . ilim holding s.a . in october 2007 , international paper and ilim holding s.a . ( ilim ) completed a 50:50 joint venture to operate a pulp and paper business located in russia . ilim 2019s facilities include three paper mills located in bratsk , ust-ilimsk , and koryazhma , russia , with combined total pulp and paper capacity of over 2.5 million tons . ilim has exclusive harvesting rights on timberland and forest areas exceeding 12.8 million acres ( 5.2 million hectares ) . products and brand designations appearing in italics are trademarks of international paper or a related company . industry segment results industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods pro- duction , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing effi- ciency and product mix . industrial packaging results for 2009 and 2008 include the cbpr business acquired in the 2008 third quarter . net sales for 2009 increased 16% ( 16 % ) to $ 8.9 billion compared with $ 7.7 billion in 2008 , and 69% ( 69 % ) compared with $ 5.2 billion in 2007 . operating profits were 95% ( 95 % ) higher in 2009 than in 2008 and more than double 2007 levels . benefits from higher total year-over-year shipments , including the impact of the cbpr business , ( $ 11 million ) , favorable operating costs ( $ 294 million ) , and lower raw material and freight costs ( $ 295 million ) were parti- ally offset by the effects of lower price realizations ( $ 243 million ) , higher corporate overhead allocations ( $ 85 million ) , incremental integration costs asso- ciated with the acquisition of the cbpr business ( $ 3 million ) and higher other costs ( $ 7 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2009 included a gain of $ 849 million relating to alternative fuel mix- ture credits , u.s . plant closure costs of $ 653 million , and costs associated with the shutdown of the eti- enne mill in france of $ 87 million . industrial packaging in millions 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 8890</td><td>$ 7690</td><td>$ 5245</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>761</td><td>390</td><td>374</td></tr></table> north american industrial packaging results include the net sales and operating profits of the cbpr business from the august 4 , 2008 acquis- ition date . net sales were $ 7.6 billion in 2009 com- pared with $ 6.2 billion in 2008 and $ 3.9 billion in 2007 . operating profits in 2009 were $ 791 million ( $ 682 million excluding alternative fuel mixture cred- its , mill closure costs and costs associated with the cbpr integration ) compared with $ 322 million ( $ 414 million excluding charges related to the write-up of cbpr inventory to fair value , cbpr integration costs and other facility closure costs ) in 2008 and $ 305 million in 2007 . excluding the effect of the cbpr acquisition , con- tainerboard and box shipments were lower in 2009 compared with 2008 reflecting weaker customer demand . average sales price realizations were sig- nificantly lower for both containerboard and boxes due to weaker world-wide economic conditions . however , average sales margins for boxes .
Question: what was the total of industrial packaging sales in 2009?
Answer: 8890.0
Question: and what was it in 2008?
Answer: 7690.0
Question: by how much, then, did it increase over the year?
Answer: 1200.0
Question: and over the previous year, from 2007 to 2008, what was that increase?
| 2445.0 |
CONVFINQA4392 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 30 , dec 31 , dec 26 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended ( in millions )</td><td>dec 302017</td><td>dec 312016</td><td>dec 262015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 22110</td><td>$ 21808</td><td>$ 19018</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-15762 ( 15762 )</td><td>-25817 ( 25817 )</td><td>-8183 ( 8183 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>-8475 ( 8475 )</td><td>-5739 ( 5739 )</td><td>1912</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2127 ( 2127 )</td><td>$ -9748 ( 9748 )</td><td>$ 12747</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities . for 2017 compared to 2016 , the $ 302 million increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes to working capital partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items and lower net income . tax reform did not have an impact on our 2017 cash provided by operating activities . the increase in cash provided by operating activities was driven by increased income before taxes and $ 1.0 billion receipts of customer deposits . these increases were partially offset by increased inventory and accounts receivable . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2017 compared to 2016 were $ 2.9 billion higher due to higher income before taxes , taxable gains on sales of asml , and taxes on the isecg divestiture . we expect approximately $ 2.0 billion of additional customer deposits in 2018 . for 2016 compared to 2015 , the $ 2.8 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to adjustments for non-cash items and changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income . the adjustments for non-cash items were higher in 2016 primarily due to restructuring and other charges and the change in deferred taxes , partially offset by lower depreciation . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; and proceeds from divestitures and cash used for acquisitions . our capital expenditures were $ 11.8 billion in 2017 ( $ 9.6 billion in 2016 and $ 7.3 billion in 2015 ) . the decrease in cash used for investing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to higher net activity of available-for sale-investments in 2017 , proceeds from our divestiture of isecg in 2017 , and higher maturities and sales of trading assets in 2017 . this activity was partially offset by higher capital expenditures in 2017 . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to our completed acquisition of altera , net purchases of trading assets in 2016 compared to net sales of trading assets in 2015 , and higher capital expenditures in 2016 . this increase was partially offset by lower investments in non-marketable equity investments . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of short-term and long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock through employee equity incentive plans . the increase in cash used for financing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to net long-term debt activity , which was a use of cash in 2017 compared to a source of cash in 2016 . during 2017 , we repurchased $ 3.6 billion of common stock under our authorized common stock repurchase program , compared to $ 2.6 billion in 2016 . as of december 30 , 2017 , $ 13.2 billion remained available for repurchasing common stock under the existing repurchase authorization limit . we base our level of common stock repurchases on internal cash management decisions , and this level may fluctuate . proceeds from the sale of common stock through employee equity incentive plans totaled $ 770 million in 2017 compared to $ 1.1 billion in 2016 . our total dividend payments were $ 5.1 billion in 2017 compared to $ 4.9 billion in 2016 . we have paid a cash dividend in each of the past 101 quarters . in january 2018 , our board of directors approved an increase to our cash dividend to $ 1.20 per share on an annual basis . the board has declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.30 per share of common stock for q1 2018 . the dividend is payable on march 1 , 2018 to stockholders of record on february 7 , 2018 . cash was used for financing activities in 2016 compared to cash provided by financing activities in 2015 , primarily due to fewer debt issuances and the repayment of debt in 2016 . this activity was partially offset by repayment of commercial paper in 2015 and fewer common stock repurchases in 2016 . md&a - results of operations consolidated results and analysis 37 .
Question: what was the change in net cash provided by operating activities from 2015 to 2016?
| 2790.0 |
CONVFINQA4393 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 30 , dec 31 , dec 26 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended ( in millions )</td><td>dec 302017</td><td>dec 312016</td><td>dec 262015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 22110</td><td>$ 21808</td><td>$ 19018</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-15762 ( 15762 )</td><td>-25817 ( 25817 )</td><td>-8183 ( 8183 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>-8475 ( 8475 )</td><td>-5739 ( 5739 )</td><td>1912</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2127 ( 2127 )</td><td>$ -9748 ( 9748 )</td><td>$ 12747</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities . for 2017 compared to 2016 , the $ 302 million increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes to working capital partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items and lower net income . tax reform did not have an impact on our 2017 cash provided by operating activities . the increase in cash provided by operating activities was driven by increased income before taxes and $ 1.0 billion receipts of customer deposits . these increases were partially offset by increased inventory and accounts receivable . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2017 compared to 2016 were $ 2.9 billion higher due to higher income before taxes , taxable gains on sales of asml , and taxes on the isecg divestiture . we expect approximately $ 2.0 billion of additional customer deposits in 2018 . for 2016 compared to 2015 , the $ 2.8 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to adjustments for non-cash items and changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income . the adjustments for non-cash items were higher in 2016 primarily due to restructuring and other charges and the change in deferred taxes , partially offset by lower depreciation . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; and proceeds from divestitures and cash used for acquisitions . our capital expenditures were $ 11.8 billion in 2017 ( $ 9.6 billion in 2016 and $ 7.3 billion in 2015 ) . the decrease in cash used for investing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to higher net activity of available-for sale-investments in 2017 , proceeds from our divestiture of isecg in 2017 , and higher maturities and sales of trading assets in 2017 . this activity was partially offset by higher capital expenditures in 2017 . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to our completed acquisition of altera , net purchases of trading assets in 2016 compared to net sales of trading assets in 2015 , and higher capital expenditures in 2016 . this increase was partially offset by lower investments in non-marketable equity investments . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of short-term and long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock through employee equity incentive plans . the increase in cash used for financing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to net long-term debt activity , which was a use of cash in 2017 compared to a source of cash in 2016 . during 2017 , we repurchased $ 3.6 billion of common stock under our authorized common stock repurchase program , compared to $ 2.6 billion in 2016 . as of december 30 , 2017 , $ 13.2 billion remained available for repurchasing common stock under the existing repurchase authorization limit . we base our level of common stock repurchases on internal cash management decisions , and this level may fluctuate . proceeds from the sale of common stock through employee equity incentive plans totaled $ 770 million in 2017 compared to $ 1.1 billion in 2016 . our total dividend payments were $ 5.1 billion in 2017 compared to $ 4.9 billion in 2016 . we have paid a cash dividend in each of the past 101 quarters . in january 2018 , our board of directors approved an increase to our cash dividend to $ 1.20 per share on an annual basis . the board has declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.30 per share of common stock for q1 2018 . the dividend is payable on march 1 , 2018 to stockholders of record on february 7 , 2018 . cash was used for financing activities in 2016 compared to cash provided by financing activities in 2015 , primarily due to fewer debt issuances and the repayment of debt in 2016 . this activity was partially offset by repayment of commercial paper in 2015 and fewer common stock repurchases in 2016 . md&a - results of operations consolidated results and analysis 37 .
Question: what was the change in net cash provided by operating activities from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 2790.0
Question: and what was that net cash in 2015?
| 19018.0 |
CONVFINQA4394 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 30 , dec 31 , dec 26 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended ( in millions )</td><td>dec 302017</td><td>dec 312016</td><td>dec 262015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 22110</td><td>$ 21808</td><td>$ 19018</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-15762 ( 15762 )</td><td>-25817 ( 25817 )</td><td>-8183 ( 8183 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>-8475 ( 8475 )</td><td>-5739 ( 5739 )</td><td>1912</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2127 ( 2127 )</td><td>$ -9748 ( 9748 )</td><td>$ 12747</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities . for 2017 compared to 2016 , the $ 302 million increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes to working capital partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items and lower net income . tax reform did not have an impact on our 2017 cash provided by operating activities . the increase in cash provided by operating activities was driven by increased income before taxes and $ 1.0 billion receipts of customer deposits . these increases were partially offset by increased inventory and accounts receivable . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2017 compared to 2016 were $ 2.9 billion higher due to higher income before taxes , taxable gains on sales of asml , and taxes on the isecg divestiture . we expect approximately $ 2.0 billion of additional customer deposits in 2018 . for 2016 compared to 2015 , the $ 2.8 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to adjustments for non-cash items and changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income . the adjustments for non-cash items were higher in 2016 primarily due to restructuring and other charges and the change in deferred taxes , partially offset by lower depreciation . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; and proceeds from divestitures and cash used for acquisitions . our capital expenditures were $ 11.8 billion in 2017 ( $ 9.6 billion in 2016 and $ 7.3 billion in 2015 ) . the decrease in cash used for investing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to higher net activity of available-for sale-investments in 2017 , proceeds from our divestiture of isecg in 2017 , and higher maturities and sales of trading assets in 2017 . this activity was partially offset by higher capital expenditures in 2017 . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to our completed acquisition of altera , net purchases of trading assets in 2016 compared to net sales of trading assets in 2015 , and higher capital expenditures in 2016 . this increase was partially offset by lower investments in non-marketable equity investments . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of short-term and long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock through employee equity incentive plans . the increase in cash used for financing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to net long-term debt activity , which was a use of cash in 2017 compared to a source of cash in 2016 . during 2017 , we repurchased $ 3.6 billion of common stock under our authorized common stock repurchase program , compared to $ 2.6 billion in 2016 . as of december 30 , 2017 , $ 13.2 billion remained available for repurchasing common stock under the existing repurchase authorization limit . we base our level of common stock repurchases on internal cash management decisions , and this level may fluctuate . proceeds from the sale of common stock through employee equity incentive plans totaled $ 770 million in 2017 compared to $ 1.1 billion in 2016 . our total dividend payments were $ 5.1 billion in 2017 compared to $ 4.9 billion in 2016 . we have paid a cash dividend in each of the past 101 quarters . in january 2018 , our board of directors approved an increase to our cash dividend to $ 1.20 per share on an annual basis . the board has declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.30 per share of common stock for q1 2018 . the dividend is payable on march 1 , 2018 to stockholders of record on february 7 , 2018 . cash was used for financing activities in 2016 compared to cash provided by financing activities in 2015 , primarily due to fewer debt issuances and the repayment of debt in 2016 . this activity was partially offset by repayment of commercial paper in 2015 and fewer common stock repurchases in 2016 . md&a - results of operations consolidated results and analysis 37 .
Question: what was the change in net cash provided by operating activities from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 2790.0
Question: and what was that net cash in 2015?
Answer: 19018.0
Question: what percentage, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2015 amount?
| 0.1467 |
CONVFINQA4395 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 30 , dec 31 , dec 26 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended ( in millions )</td><td>dec 302017</td><td>dec 312016</td><td>dec 262015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 22110</td><td>$ 21808</td><td>$ 19018</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-15762 ( 15762 )</td><td>-25817 ( 25817 )</td><td>-8183 ( 8183 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>-8475 ( 8475 )</td><td>-5739 ( 5739 )</td><td>1912</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2127 ( 2127 )</td><td>$ -9748 ( 9748 )</td><td>$ 12747</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities . for 2017 compared to 2016 , the $ 302 million increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes to working capital partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items and lower net income . tax reform did not have an impact on our 2017 cash provided by operating activities . the increase in cash provided by operating activities was driven by increased income before taxes and $ 1.0 billion receipts of customer deposits . these increases were partially offset by increased inventory and accounts receivable . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2017 compared to 2016 were $ 2.9 billion higher due to higher income before taxes , taxable gains on sales of asml , and taxes on the isecg divestiture . we expect approximately $ 2.0 billion of additional customer deposits in 2018 . for 2016 compared to 2015 , the $ 2.8 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to adjustments for non-cash items and changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income . the adjustments for non-cash items were higher in 2016 primarily due to restructuring and other charges and the change in deferred taxes , partially offset by lower depreciation . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; and proceeds from divestitures and cash used for acquisitions . our capital expenditures were $ 11.8 billion in 2017 ( $ 9.6 billion in 2016 and $ 7.3 billion in 2015 ) . the decrease in cash used for investing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to higher net activity of available-for sale-investments in 2017 , proceeds from our divestiture of isecg in 2017 , and higher maturities and sales of trading assets in 2017 . this activity was partially offset by higher capital expenditures in 2017 . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to our completed acquisition of altera , net purchases of trading assets in 2016 compared to net sales of trading assets in 2015 , and higher capital expenditures in 2016 . this increase was partially offset by lower investments in non-marketable equity investments . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of short-term and long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock through employee equity incentive plans . the increase in cash used for financing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to net long-term debt activity , which was a use of cash in 2017 compared to a source of cash in 2016 . during 2017 , we repurchased $ 3.6 billion of common stock under our authorized common stock repurchase program , compared to $ 2.6 billion in 2016 . as of december 30 , 2017 , $ 13.2 billion remained available for repurchasing common stock under the existing repurchase authorization limit . we base our level of common stock repurchases on internal cash management decisions , and this level may fluctuate . proceeds from the sale of common stock through employee equity incentive plans totaled $ 770 million in 2017 compared to $ 1.1 billion in 2016 . our total dividend payments were $ 5.1 billion in 2017 compared to $ 4.9 billion in 2016 . we have paid a cash dividend in each of the past 101 quarters . in january 2018 , our board of directors approved an increase to our cash dividend to $ 1.20 per share on an annual basis . the board has declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.30 per share of common stock for q1 2018 . the dividend is payable on march 1 , 2018 to stockholders of record on february 7 , 2018 . cash was used for financing activities in 2016 compared to cash provided by financing activities in 2015 , primarily due to fewer debt issuances and the repayment of debt in 2016 . this activity was partially offset by repayment of commercial paper in 2015 and fewer common stock repurchases in 2016 . md&a - results of operations consolidated results and analysis 37 .
Question: what was the change in net cash provided by operating activities from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 2790.0
Question: and what was that net cash in 2015?
Answer: 19018.0
Question: what percentage, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2015 amount?
Answer: 0.1467
Question: and throughout the subsequent year, what was the increase in the total of capital expenditures?
| 2.2 |
CONVFINQA4396 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 30 , dec 31 , dec 26 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended ( in millions )</td><td>dec 302017</td><td>dec 312016</td><td>dec 262015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 22110</td><td>$ 21808</td><td>$ 19018</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-15762 ( 15762 )</td><td>-25817 ( 25817 )</td><td>-8183 ( 8183 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>-8475 ( 8475 )</td><td>-5739 ( 5739 )</td><td>1912</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2127 ( 2127 )</td><td>$ -9748 ( 9748 )</td><td>$ 12747</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities . for 2017 compared to 2016 , the $ 302 million increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes to working capital partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items and lower net income . tax reform did not have an impact on our 2017 cash provided by operating activities . the increase in cash provided by operating activities was driven by increased income before taxes and $ 1.0 billion receipts of customer deposits . these increases were partially offset by increased inventory and accounts receivable . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2017 compared to 2016 were $ 2.9 billion higher due to higher income before taxes , taxable gains on sales of asml , and taxes on the isecg divestiture . we expect approximately $ 2.0 billion of additional customer deposits in 2018 . for 2016 compared to 2015 , the $ 2.8 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to adjustments for non-cash items and changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income . the adjustments for non-cash items were higher in 2016 primarily due to restructuring and other charges and the change in deferred taxes , partially offset by lower depreciation . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; and proceeds from divestitures and cash used for acquisitions . our capital expenditures were $ 11.8 billion in 2017 ( $ 9.6 billion in 2016 and $ 7.3 billion in 2015 ) . the decrease in cash used for investing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to higher net activity of available-for sale-investments in 2017 , proceeds from our divestiture of isecg in 2017 , and higher maturities and sales of trading assets in 2017 . this activity was partially offset by higher capital expenditures in 2017 . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to our completed acquisition of altera , net purchases of trading assets in 2016 compared to net sales of trading assets in 2015 , and higher capital expenditures in 2016 . this increase was partially offset by lower investments in non-marketable equity investments . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of short-term and long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock through employee equity incentive plans . the increase in cash used for financing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to net long-term debt activity , which was a use of cash in 2017 compared to a source of cash in 2016 . during 2017 , we repurchased $ 3.6 billion of common stock under our authorized common stock repurchase program , compared to $ 2.6 billion in 2016 . as of december 30 , 2017 , $ 13.2 billion remained available for repurchasing common stock under the existing repurchase authorization limit . we base our level of common stock repurchases on internal cash management decisions , and this level may fluctuate . proceeds from the sale of common stock through employee equity incentive plans totaled $ 770 million in 2017 compared to $ 1.1 billion in 2016 . our total dividend payments were $ 5.1 billion in 2017 compared to $ 4.9 billion in 2016 . we have paid a cash dividend in each of the past 101 quarters . in january 2018 , our board of directors approved an increase to our cash dividend to $ 1.20 per share on an annual basis . the board has declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.30 per share of common stock for q1 2018 . the dividend is payable on march 1 , 2018 to stockholders of record on february 7 , 2018 . cash was used for financing activities in 2016 compared to cash provided by financing activities in 2015 , primarily due to fewer debt issuances and the repayment of debt in 2016 . this activity was partially offset by repayment of commercial paper in 2015 and fewer common stock repurchases in 2016 . md&a - results of operations consolidated results and analysis 37 .
Question: what was the change in net cash provided by operating activities from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 2790.0
Question: and what was that net cash in 2015?
Answer: 19018.0
Question: what percentage, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2015 amount?
Answer: 0.1467
Question: and throughout the subsequent year, what was the increase in the total of capital expenditures?
Answer: 2.2
Question: what is this increase as a percent of that total in 2016?
| 0.22917 |
CONVFINQA4397 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table presents the net periodic pension and opeb cost/ ( benefit ) for the years ended december 31 : millions 2013 2012 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>est.2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net periodic pension cost</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 89</td><td>$ 78</td><td>$ 51</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net periodic opeb cost/ ( benefit )</td><td>15</td><td>13</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td></tr></table> our net periodic pension cost is expected to increase to approximately $ 111 million in 2013 from $ 89 million in 2012 . the increase is driven mainly by a decrease in the discount rate to 3.78% ( 3.78 % ) , our net periodic opeb expense is expected to increase to approximately $ 15 million in 2013 from $ 13 million in 2012 . the increase in our net periodic opeb cost is primarily driven by a decrease in the discount rate to 3.48% ( 3.48 % ) . cautionary information certain statements in this report , and statements in other reports or information filed or to be filed with the sec ( as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made by us ) , are , or will be , forward-looking statements as defined by the securities act of 1933 and the securities exchange act of 1934 . these forward-looking statements and information include , without limitation , ( a ) statements in the ceo 2019s letter preceding part i ; statements regarding planned capital expenditures under the caption 201c2013 capital expenditures 201d in item 2 of part i ; statements regarding dividends in item 5 ; and statements and information set forth under the captions 201c2013 outlook 201d and 201cliquidity and capital resources 201d in this item 7 , and ( b ) any other statements or information in this report ( including information incorporated herein by reference ) regarding : expectations as to financial performance , revenue growth and cost savings ; the time by which goals , targets , or objectives will be achieved ; projections , predictions , expectations , estimates , or forecasts as to our business , financial and operational results , future economic performance , and general economic conditions ; expectations as to operational or service performance or improvements ; expectations as to the effectiveness of steps taken or to be taken to improve operations and/or service , including capital expenditures for infrastructure improvements and equipment acquisitions , any strategic business acquisitions , and modifications to our transportation plans ( including statements set forth in item 2 as to expectations related to our planned capital expenditures ) ; expectations as to existing or proposed new products and services ; expectations as to the impact of any new regulatory activities or legislation on our operations or financial results ; estimates of costs relating to environmental remediation and restoration ; estimates and expectations regarding tax matters ; expectations that claims , litigation , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , labor negotiations or agreements , or other matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity and any other similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts . forward-looking statements may be identified by their use of forward-looking terminology , such as 201cbelieves , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cshould , 201d 201cwould , 201d 201cwill , 201d 201cintends , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201canticipates , 201d 201cprojects 201d and similar words , phrases or expressions . forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results , and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times that , or by which , such performance or results will be achieved . forward-looking statements and information are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements and information . forward-looking statements and information reflect the good faith consideration by management of currently available information , and may be based on underlying assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances . however , such information and assumptions ( and , therefore , such forward-looking statements and information ) are or may be subject to variables or unknown or unforeseeable events or circumstances over which management has little or no influence or control . the risk factors in item 1a of this report could affect our future results and could cause those results or other outcomes to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements or information . to the extent circumstances require or we deem it otherwise necessary , we will update or amend these risk factors in a form 10-q , form 8-k or subsequent form 10-k . all forward-looking statements are qualified by , and should be read in conjunction with , these risk factors . forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement was made . we assume no obligation to update forward-looking information to reflect actual results , changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information . if we do update one or more forward-looking .
Question: what was the 2012 pension cost?
| 89.0 |
CONVFINQA4398 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table presents the net periodic pension and opeb cost/ ( benefit ) for the years ended december 31 : millions 2013 2012 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>est.2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net periodic pension cost</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 89</td><td>$ 78</td><td>$ 51</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net periodic opeb cost/ ( benefit )</td><td>15</td><td>13</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td></tr></table> our net periodic pension cost is expected to increase to approximately $ 111 million in 2013 from $ 89 million in 2012 . the increase is driven mainly by a decrease in the discount rate to 3.78% ( 3.78 % ) , our net periodic opeb expense is expected to increase to approximately $ 15 million in 2013 from $ 13 million in 2012 . the increase in our net periodic opeb cost is primarily driven by a decrease in the discount rate to 3.48% ( 3.48 % ) . cautionary information certain statements in this report , and statements in other reports or information filed or to be filed with the sec ( as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made by us ) , are , or will be , forward-looking statements as defined by the securities act of 1933 and the securities exchange act of 1934 . these forward-looking statements and information include , without limitation , ( a ) statements in the ceo 2019s letter preceding part i ; statements regarding planned capital expenditures under the caption 201c2013 capital expenditures 201d in item 2 of part i ; statements regarding dividends in item 5 ; and statements and information set forth under the captions 201c2013 outlook 201d and 201cliquidity and capital resources 201d in this item 7 , and ( b ) any other statements or information in this report ( including information incorporated herein by reference ) regarding : expectations as to financial performance , revenue growth and cost savings ; the time by which goals , targets , or objectives will be achieved ; projections , predictions , expectations , estimates , or forecasts as to our business , financial and operational results , future economic performance , and general economic conditions ; expectations as to operational or service performance or improvements ; expectations as to the effectiveness of steps taken or to be taken to improve operations and/or service , including capital expenditures for infrastructure improvements and equipment acquisitions , any strategic business acquisitions , and modifications to our transportation plans ( including statements set forth in item 2 as to expectations related to our planned capital expenditures ) ; expectations as to existing or proposed new products and services ; expectations as to the impact of any new regulatory activities or legislation on our operations or financial results ; estimates of costs relating to environmental remediation and restoration ; estimates and expectations regarding tax matters ; expectations that claims , litigation , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , labor negotiations or agreements , or other matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity and any other similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts . forward-looking statements may be identified by their use of forward-looking terminology , such as 201cbelieves , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cshould , 201d 201cwould , 201d 201cwill , 201d 201cintends , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201canticipates , 201d 201cprojects 201d and similar words , phrases or expressions . forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results , and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times that , or by which , such performance or results will be achieved . forward-looking statements and information are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements and information . forward-looking statements and information reflect the good faith consideration by management of currently available information , and may be based on underlying assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances . however , such information and assumptions ( and , therefore , such forward-looking statements and information ) are or may be subject to variables or unknown or unforeseeable events or circumstances over which management has little or no influence or control . the risk factors in item 1a of this report could affect our future results and could cause those results or other outcomes to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements or information . to the extent circumstances require or we deem it otherwise necessary , we will update or amend these risk factors in a form 10-q , form 8-k or subsequent form 10-k . all forward-looking statements are qualified by , and should be read in conjunction with , these risk factors . forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement was made . we assume no obligation to update forward-looking information to reflect actual results , changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information . if we do update one or more forward-looking .
Question: what was the 2012 pension cost?
Answer: 89.0
Question: what was it in 2011?
| 78.0 |
CONVFINQA4399 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table presents the net periodic pension and opeb cost/ ( benefit ) for the years ended december 31 : millions 2013 2012 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>est.2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net periodic pension cost</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 89</td><td>$ 78</td><td>$ 51</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net periodic opeb cost/ ( benefit )</td><td>15</td><td>13</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td></tr></table> our net periodic pension cost is expected to increase to approximately $ 111 million in 2013 from $ 89 million in 2012 . the increase is driven mainly by a decrease in the discount rate to 3.78% ( 3.78 % ) , our net periodic opeb expense is expected to increase to approximately $ 15 million in 2013 from $ 13 million in 2012 . the increase in our net periodic opeb cost is primarily driven by a decrease in the discount rate to 3.48% ( 3.48 % ) . cautionary information certain statements in this report , and statements in other reports or information filed or to be filed with the sec ( as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made by us ) , are , or will be , forward-looking statements as defined by the securities act of 1933 and the securities exchange act of 1934 . these forward-looking statements and information include , without limitation , ( a ) statements in the ceo 2019s letter preceding part i ; statements regarding planned capital expenditures under the caption 201c2013 capital expenditures 201d in item 2 of part i ; statements regarding dividends in item 5 ; and statements and information set forth under the captions 201c2013 outlook 201d and 201cliquidity and capital resources 201d in this item 7 , and ( b ) any other statements or information in this report ( including information incorporated herein by reference ) regarding : expectations as to financial performance , revenue growth and cost savings ; the time by which goals , targets , or objectives will be achieved ; projections , predictions , expectations , estimates , or forecasts as to our business , financial and operational results , future economic performance , and general economic conditions ; expectations as to operational or service performance or improvements ; expectations as to the effectiveness of steps taken or to be taken to improve operations and/or service , including capital expenditures for infrastructure improvements and equipment acquisitions , any strategic business acquisitions , and modifications to our transportation plans ( including statements set forth in item 2 as to expectations related to our planned capital expenditures ) ; expectations as to existing or proposed new products and services ; expectations as to the impact of any new regulatory activities or legislation on our operations or financial results ; estimates of costs relating to environmental remediation and restoration ; estimates and expectations regarding tax matters ; expectations that claims , litigation , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , labor negotiations or agreements , or other matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity and any other similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts . forward-looking statements may be identified by their use of forward-looking terminology , such as 201cbelieves , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cshould , 201d 201cwould , 201d 201cwill , 201d 201cintends , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201canticipates , 201d 201cprojects 201d and similar words , phrases or expressions . forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results , and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times that , or by which , such performance or results will be achieved . forward-looking statements and information are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements and information . forward-looking statements and information reflect the good faith consideration by management of currently available information , and may be based on underlying assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances . however , such information and assumptions ( and , therefore , such forward-looking statements and information ) are or may be subject to variables or unknown or unforeseeable events or circumstances over which management has little or no influence or control . the risk factors in item 1a of this report could affect our future results and could cause those results or other outcomes to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements or information . to the extent circumstances require or we deem it otherwise necessary , we will update or amend these risk factors in a form 10-q , form 8-k or subsequent form 10-k . all forward-looking statements are qualified by , and should be read in conjunction with , these risk factors . forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement was made . we assume no obligation to update forward-looking information to reflect actual results , changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information . if we do update one or more forward-looking .
Question: what was the 2012 pension cost?
Answer: 89.0
Question: what was it in 2011?
Answer: 78.0
Question: what is the ratio of 2012 to 2011?
| 1.14103 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.