id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA4400 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table presents the net periodic pension and opeb cost/ ( benefit ) for the years ended december 31 : millions 2013 2012 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>est.2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net periodic pension cost</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 89</td><td>$ 78</td><td>$ 51</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net periodic opeb cost/ ( benefit )</td><td>15</td><td>13</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td></tr></table> our net periodic pension cost is expected to increase to approximately $ 111 million in 2013 from $ 89 million in 2012 . the increase is driven mainly by a decrease in the discount rate to 3.78% ( 3.78 % ) , our net periodic opeb expense is expected to increase to approximately $ 15 million in 2013 from $ 13 million in 2012 . the increase in our net periodic opeb cost is primarily driven by a decrease in the discount rate to 3.48% ( 3.48 % ) . cautionary information certain statements in this report , and statements in other reports or information filed or to be filed with the sec ( as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made by us ) , are , or will be , forward-looking statements as defined by the securities act of 1933 and the securities exchange act of 1934 . these forward-looking statements and information include , without limitation , ( a ) statements in the ceo 2019s letter preceding part i ; statements regarding planned capital expenditures under the caption 201c2013 capital expenditures 201d in item 2 of part i ; statements regarding dividends in item 5 ; and statements and information set forth under the captions 201c2013 outlook 201d and 201cliquidity and capital resources 201d in this item 7 , and ( b ) any other statements or information in this report ( including information incorporated herein by reference ) regarding : expectations as to financial performance , revenue growth and cost savings ; the time by which goals , targets , or objectives will be achieved ; projections , predictions , expectations , estimates , or forecasts as to our business , financial and operational results , future economic performance , and general economic conditions ; expectations as to operational or service performance or improvements ; expectations as to the effectiveness of steps taken or to be taken to improve operations and/or service , including capital expenditures for infrastructure improvements and equipment acquisitions , any strategic business acquisitions , and modifications to our transportation plans ( including statements set forth in item 2 as to expectations related to our planned capital expenditures ) ; expectations as to existing or proposed new products and services ; expectations as to the impact of any new regulatory activities or legislation on our operations or financial results ; estimates of costs relating to environmental remediation and restoration ; estimates and expectations regarding tax matters ; expectations that claims , litigation , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , labor negotiations or agreements , or other matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity and any other similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts . forward-looking statements may be identified by their use of forward-looking terminology , such as 201cbelieves , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cshould , 201d 201cwould , 201d 201cwill , 201d 201cintends , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201canticipates , 201d 201cprojects 201d and similar words , phrases or expressions . forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results , and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times that , or by which , such performance or results will be achieved . forward-looking statements and information are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements and information . forward-looking statements and information reflect the good faith consideration by management of currently available information , and may be based on underlying assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances . however , such information and assumptions ( and , therefore , such forward-looking statements and information ) are or may be subject to variables or unknown or unforeseeable events or circumstances over which management has little or no influence or control . the risk factors in item 1a of this report could affect our future results and could cause those results or other outcomes to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements or information . to the extent circumstances require or we deem it otherwise necessary , we will update or amend these risk factors in a form 10-q , form 8-k or subsequent form 10-k . all forward-looking statements are qualified by , and should be read in conjunction with , these risk factors . forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement was made . we assume no obligation to update forward-looking information to reflect actual results , changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information . if we do update one or more forward-looking .
Question: what was the 2012 pension cost?
Answer: 89.0
Question: what was it in 2011?
Answer: 78.0
Question: what is the ratio of 2012 to 2011?
Answer: 1.14103
Question: what is that times the 2012 net periodic opeb cost/ ( benefit )?
| 14.83333 |
CONVFINQA4401 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) not be estimated based on observable market prices , and as such , unobservable inputs were used . for auction rate securities , valuation methodologies include consideration of the quality of the sector and issuer , underlying collateral , underlying final maturity dates , and liquidity . recently issued accounting pronouncements there are no recently issued accounting standards that apply to us or that will have a material impact on our results of operations , financial condition , or cash flows . 3 . acquisitions on december 21 , 2012 , we acquired metropolitan health networks , inc. , or metropolitan , a medical services organization , or mso , that coordinates medical care for medicare advantage beneficiaries and medicaid recipients , primarily in florida . we paid $ 11.25 per share in cash to acquire all of the outstanding shares of metropolitan and repaid all outstanding debt of metropolitan for a transaction value of $ 851 million , plus transaction expenses . the preliminary fair values of metropolitan 2019s assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition are summarized as follows : metropolitan ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>metropolitan ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 49</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>receivables net</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other current assets</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>property and equipment</td><td>22</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>goodwill</td><td>569</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets</td><td>263</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other long-term assets</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>972</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other long-term liabilities</td><td>-99 ( 99 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total liabilities assumed</td><td>-121 ( 121 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 851</td></tr></table> the goodwill was assigned to the health and well-being services segment and is not deductible for tax purposes . the other intangible assets , which primarily consist of customer contracts and trade names , have a weighted average useful life of 8.4 years . on october 29 , 2012 , we acquired a noncontrolling equity interest in mcci holdings , llc , or mcci , a privately held mso headquartered in miami , florida that coordinates medical care for medicare advantage and medicaid beneficiaries primarily in florida and texas . the metropolitan and mcci transactions are expected to provide us with components of a successful integrated care delivery model that has demonstrated scalability to new markets . a substantial portion of the revenues for both metropolitan and mcci are derived from services provided to humana medicare advantage members under capitation contracts with our health plans . in addition , metropolitan and mcci provide services to medicare advantage and medicaid members under capitation contracts with third party health plans . under these capitation agreements with humana and third party health plans , metropolitan and mcci assume financial risk associated with these medicare advantage and medicaid members. .
Question: what is the value of cash and cash equivalents?
| 49.0 |
CONVFINQA4402 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) not be estimated based on observable market prices , and as such , unobservable inputs were used . for auction rate securities , valuation methodologies include consideration of the quality of the sector and issuer , underlying collateral , underlying final maturity dates , and liquidity . recently issued accounting pronouncements there are no recently issued accounting standards that apply to us or that will have a material impact on our results of operations , financial condition , or cash flows . 3 . acquisitions on december 21 , 2012 , we acquired metropolitan health networks , inc. , or metropolitan , a medical services organization , or mso , that coordinates medical care for medicare advantage beneficiaries and medicaid recipients , primarily in florida . we paid $ 11.25 per share in cash to acquire all of the outstanding shares of metropolitan and repaid all outstanding debt of metropolitan for a transaction value of $ 851 million , plus transaction expenses . the preliminary fair values of metropolitan 2019s assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition are summarized as follows : metropolitan ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>metropolitan ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 49</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>receivables net</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other current assets</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>property and equipment</td><td>22</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>goodwill</td><td>569</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets</td><td>263</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other long-term assets</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>972</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other long-term liabilities</td><td>-99 ( 99 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total liabilities assumed</td><td>-121 ( 121 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 851</td></tr></table> the goodwill was assigned to the health and well-being services segment and is not deductible for tax purposes . the other intangible assets , which primarily consist of customer contracts and trade names , have a weighted average useful life of 8.4 years . on october 29 , 2012 , we acquired a noncontrolling equity interest in mcci holdings , llc , or mcci , a privately held mso headquartered in miami , florida that coordinates medical care for medicare advantage and medicaid beneficiaries primarily in florida and texas . the metropolitan and mcci transactions are expected to provide us with components of a successful integrated care delivery model that has demonstrated scalability to new markets . a substantial portion of the revenues for both metropolitan and mcci are derived from services provided to humana medicare advantage members under capitation contracts with our health plans . in addition , metropolitan and mcci provide services to medicare advantage and medicaid members under capitation contracts with third party health plans . under these capitation agreements with humana and third party health plans , metropolitan and mcci assume financial risk associated with these medicare advantage and medicaid members. .
Question: what is the value of cash and cash equivalents?
Answer: 49.0
Question: what is the value of net receivables?
| 28.0 |
CONVFINQA4403 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) not be estimated based on observable market prices , and as such , unobservable inputs were used . for auction rate securities , valuation methodologies include consideration of the quality of the sector and issuer , underlying collateral , underlying final maturity dates , and liquidity . recently issued accounting pronouncements there are no recently issued accounting standards that apply to us or that will have a material impact on our results of operations , financial condition , or cash flows . 3 . acquisitions on december 21 , 2012 , we acquired metropolitan health networks , inc. , or metropolitan , a medical services organization , or mso , that coordinates medical care for medicare advantage beneficiaries and medicaid recipients , primarily in florida . we paid $ 11.25 per share in cash to acquire all of the outstanding shares of metropolitan and repaid all outstanding debt of metropolitan for a transaction value of $ 851 million , plus transaction expenses . the preliminary fair values of metropolitan 2019s assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition are summarized as follows : metropolitan ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>metropolitan ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 49</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>receivables net</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other current assets</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>property and equipment</td><td>22</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>goodwill</td><td>569</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets</td><td>263</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other long-term assets</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>972</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other long-term liabilities</td><td>-99 ( 99 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total liabilities assumed</td><td>-121 ( 121 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 851</td></tr></table> the goodwill was assigned to the health and well-being services segment and is not deductible for tax purposes . the other intangible assets , which primarily consist of customer contracts and trade names , have a weighted average useful life of 8.4 years . on october 29 , 2012 , we acquired a noncontrolling equity interest in mcci holdings , llc , or mcci , a privately held mso headquartered in miami , florida that coordinates medical care for medicare advantage and medicaid beneficiaries primarily in florida and texas . the metropolitan and mcci transactions are expected to provide us with components of a successful integrated care delivery model that has demonstrated scalability to new markets . a substantial portion of the revenues for both metropolitan and mcci are derived from services provided to humana medicare advantage members under capitation contracts with our health plans . in addition , metropolitan and mcci provide services to medicare advantage and medicaid members under capitation contracts with third party health plans . under these capitation agreements with humana and third party health plans , metropolitan and mcci assume financial risk associated with these medicare advantage and medicaid members. .
Question: what is the value of cash and cash equivalents?
Answer: 49.0
Question: what is the value of net receivables?
Answer: 28.0
Question: what is the sum of those two values?
| 77.0 |
CONVFINQA4404 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) not be estimated based on observable market prices , and as such , unobservable inputs were used . for auction rate securities , valuation methodologies include consideration of the quality of the sector and issuer , underlying collateral , underlying final maturity dates , and liquidity . recently issued accounting pronouncements there are no recently issued accounting standards that apply to us or that will have a material impact on our results of operations , financial condition , or cash flows . 3 . acquisitions on december 21 , 2012 , we acquired metropolitan health networks , inc. , or metropolitan , a medical services organization , or mso , that coordinates medical care for medicare advantage beneficiaries and medicaid recipients , primarily in florida . we paid $ 11.25 per share in cash to acquire all of the outstanding shares of metropolitan and repaid all outstanding debt of metropolitan for a transaction value of $ 851 million , plus transaction expenses . the preliminary fair values of metropolitan 2019s assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition are summarized as follows : metropolitan ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>metropolitan ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 49</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>receivables net</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other current assets</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>property and equipment</td><td>22</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>goodwill</td><td>569</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets</td><td>263</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other long-term assets</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>972</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other long-term liabilities</td><td>-99 ( 99 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total liabilities assumed</td><td>-121 ( 121 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 851</td></tr></table> the goodwill was assigned to the health and well-being services segment and is not deductible for tax purposes . the other intangible assets , which primarily consist of customer contracts and trade names , have a weighted average useful life of 8.4 years . on october 29 , 2012 , we acquired a noncontrolling equity interest in mcci holdings , llc , or mcci , a privately held mso headquartered in miami , florida that coordinates medical care for medicare advantage and medicaid beneficiaries primarily in florida and texas . the metropolitan and mcci transactions are expected to provide us with components of a successful integrated care delivery model that has demonstrated scalability to new markets . a substantial portion of the revenues for both metropolitan and mcci are derived from services provided to humana medicare advantage members under capitation contracts with our health plans . in addition , metropolitan and mcci provide services to medicare advantage and medicaid members under capitation contracts with third party health plans . under these capitation agreements with humana and third party health plans , metropolitan and mcci assume financial risk associated with these medicare advantage and medicaid members. .
Question: what is the value of cash and cash equivalents?
Answer: 49.0
Question: what is the value of net receivables?
Answer: 28.0
Question: what is the sum of those two values?
Answer: 77.0
Question: what is the total including other current assets?
| 117.0 |
CONVFINQA4405 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
december 18 , 2007 , we issued an additional 23182197 shares of common stock to citadel . the issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to section 4 ( 2 ) of the securities act of 1933 , and each purchaser has represented to us that it is an 201caccredited investor 201d as defined in regulation d promulgated under the securities act of 1933 , and that the common stock was being acquired for investment . we did not engage in a general solicitation or advertising with regard to the issuances of the common stock and have not offered securities to the public in connection with the issuances . see item 1 . business 2014citadel investment . performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor 2019s ( 201cs&p 201d ) 500 and the s&p super cap diversified financials during the period from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/02</td><td>12/03</td><td>12/04</td><td>12/05</td><td>12/06</td><td>12/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>e*trade financial corporation</td><td>100.00</td><td>260.29</td><td>307.61</td><td>429.22</td><td>461.32</td><td>73.05</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p super cap diversified financials</td><td>100.00</td><td>139.29</td><td>156.28</td><td>170.89</td><td>211.13</td><td>176.62</td></tr></table> 2022 $ 100 invested on 12/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . 2022 copyright a9 2008 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .
Question: what was the change in the price of e*trade financial corporation between 12/02 and 12/07?
| -26.95 |
CONVFINQA4406 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
december 18 , 2007 , we issued an additional 23182197 shares of common stock to citadel . the issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to section 4 ( 2 ) of the securities act of 1933 , and each purchaser has represented to us that it is an 201caccredited investor 201d as defined in regulation d promulgated under the securities act of 1933 , and that the common stock was being acquired for investment . we did not engage in a general solicitation or advertising with regard to the issuances of the common stock and have not offered securities to the public in connection with the issuances . see item 1 . business 2014citadel investment . performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor 2019s ( 201cs&p 201d ) 500 and the s&p super cap diversified financials during the period from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/02</td><td>12/03</td><td>12/04</td><td>12/05</td><td>12/06</td><td>12/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>e*trade financial corporation</td><td>100.00</td><td>260.29</td><td>307.61</td><td>429.22</td><td>461.32</td><td>73.05</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p super cap diversified financials</td><td>100.00</td><td>139.29</td><td>156.28</td><td>170.89</td><td>211.13</td><td>176.62</td></tr></table> 2022 $ 100 invested on 12/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . 2022 copyright a9 2008 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .
Question: what was the change in the price of e*trade financial corporation between 12/02 and 12/07?
Answer: -26.95
Question: so what was the cumulative total return during this time?
| -0.2695 |
CONVFINQA4407 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
december 18 , 2007 , we issued an additional 23182197 shares of common stock to citadel . the issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to section 4 ( 2 ) of the securities act of 1933 , and each purchaser has represented to us that it is an 201caccredited investor 201d as defined in regulation d promulgated under the securities act of 1933 , and that the common stock was being acquired for investment . we did not engage in a general solicitation or advertising with regard to the issuances of the common stock and have not offered securities to the public in connection with the issuances . see item 1 . business 2014citadel investment . performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor 2019s ( 201cs&p 201d ) 500 and the s&p super cap diversified financials during the period from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/02</td><td>12/03</td><td>12/04</td><td>12/05</td><td>12/06</td><td>12/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>e*trade financial corporation</td><td>100.00</td><td>260.29</td><td>307.61</td><td>429.22</td><td>461.32</td><td>73.05</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p super cap diversified financials</td><td>100.00</td><td>139.29</td><td>156.28</td><td>170.89</td><td>211.13</td><td>176.62</td></tr></table> 2022 $ 100 invested on 12/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . 2022 copyright a9 2008 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .
Question: what was the change in the price of e*trade financial corporation between 12/02 and 12/07?
Answer: -26.95
Question: so what was the cumulative total return during this time?
Answer: -0.2695
Question: what was the change in price for e*trade between 2004 and 2005?
| 121.61 |
CONVFINQA4408 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
december 18 , 2007 , we issued an additional 23182197 shares of common stock to citadel . the issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to section 4 ( 2 ) of the securities act of 1933 , and each purchaser has represented to us that it is an 201caccredited investor 201d as defined in regulation d promulgated under the securities act of 1933 , and that the common stock was being acquired for investment . we did not engage in a general solicitation or advertising with regard to the issuances of the common stock and have not offered securities to the public in connection with the issuances . see item 1 . business 2014citadel investment . performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor 2019s ( 201cs&p 201d ) 500 and the s&p super cap diversified financials during the period from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/02</td><td>12/03</td><td>12/04</td><td>12/05</td><td>12/06</td><td>12/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>e*trade financial corporation</td><td>100.00</td><td>260.29</td><td>307.61</td><td>429.22</td><td>461.32</td><td>73.05</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p super cap diversified financials</td><td>100.00</td><td>139.29</td><td>156.28</td><td>170.89</td><td>211.13</td><td>176.62</td></tr></table> 2022 $ 100 invested on 12/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . 2022 copyright a9 2008 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .
Question: what was the change in the price of e*trade financial corporation between 12/02 and 12/07?
Answer: -26.95
Question: so what was the cumulative total return during this time?
Answer: -0.2695
Question: what was the change in price for e*trade between 2004 and 2005?
Answer: 121.61
Question: so what was the return over this time?
| 0.39534 |
CONVFINQA4409 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 31 of 98 additional details about the company 2019s receivables sales agreement and debt are available in notes 6 and 12 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report . other liquidity items cash payments required for long-term debt maturities , rental payments under noncancellable operating leases and purchase obligations in effect at december 31 , 2006 , are summarized in the following table: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) less than1 year</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) 1-3 years</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) 3-5 years</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) more than 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 2301.6</td><td>$ 38.5</td><td>$ 278.4</td><td>$ 972.9</td><td>$ 1011.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital lease obligations</td><td>7.6</td><td>2.7</td><td>2.4</td><td>0.4</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest payments on long-term debt ( b )</td><td>826.5</td><td>138.8</td><td>259.4</td><td>204.8</td><td>223.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating leases</td><td>185.9</td><td>45.0</td><td>58.5</td><td>38.7</td><td>43.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchase obligations ( c )</td><td>7450.4</td><td>2682.5</td><td>3169.4</td><td>1524.6</td><td>73.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total payments on contractual obligations</td><td>$ 10772.0</td><td>$ 2907.5</td><td>$ 3768.1</td><td>$ 2741.4</td><td>$ 1355.0</td></tr></table> total payments on contractual obligations $ 10772.0 $ 2907.5 $ 3768.1 $ 2741.4 $ 1355.0 ( a ) amounts reported in local currencies have been translated at the year-end exchange rates . ( b ) for variable rate facilities , amounts are based on interest rates in effect at year end . ( c ) the company 2019s purchase obligations include contracted amounts for aluminum , steel , plastic resin and other direct materials . also included are commitments for purchases of natural gas and electricity , aerospace and technologies contracts and other less significant items . in cases where variable prices and/or usage are involved , management 2019s best estimates have been used . depending on the circumstances , early termination of the contracts may not result in penalties and , therefore , actual payments could vary significantly . contributions to the company 2019s defined benefit pension plans , not including the unfunded german plans , are expected to be $ 69.1 million in 2007 . this estimate may change based on plan asset performance . benefit payments related to these plans are expected to be $ 62.6 million , $ 65.1 million , $ 68.9 million , $ 73.9 million and $ 75.1 million for the years ending december 31 , 2007 through 2011 , respectively , and $ 436.7 million combined for 2012 through 2016 . payments to participants in the unfunded german plans are expected to be $ 24.6 million , $ 25.1 million , $ 25.5 million , $ 25.9 million and $ 26.1 million in the years 2007 through 2011 , respectively , and a total of $ 136.6 million thereafter . we reduced our share repurchase program in 2006 to $ 45.7 million , net of issuances , compared to $ 358.1 million net repurchases in 2005 and $ 50 million in 2004 . the net repurchases in 2006 did not include a forward contract entered into in december 2006 for the repurchase of 1200000 shares . the contract was settled on january 5 , 2007 , for $ 51.9 million in cash . in 2007 we expect to repurchase approximately $ 175 million , net of issuances , and to reduce debt levels by more than $ 125 million . annual cash dividends paid on common stock were 40 cents per share in 2006 and 2005 and 35 cents per share in 2004 . total dividends paid were $ 41 million in 2006 , $ 42.5 million in 2005 and $ 38.9 million in 2004. .
Question: what was the value of share repurchases in 2005?
| 358.1 |
CONVFINQA4410 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 31 of 98 additional details about the company 2019s receivables sales agreement and debt are available in notes 6 and 12 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report . other liquidity items cash payments required for long-term debt maturities , rental payments under noncancellable operating leases and purchase obligations in effect at december 31 , 2006 , are summarized in the following table: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) less than1 year</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) 1-3 years</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) 3-5 years</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) more than 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 2301.6</td><td>$ 38.5</td><td>$ 278.4</td><td>$ 972.9</td><td>$ 1011.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital lease obligations</td><td>7.6</td><td>2.7</td><td>2.4</td><td>0.4</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest payments on long-term debt ( b )</td><td>826.5</td><td>138.8</td><td>259.4</td><td>204.8</td><td>223.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating leases</td><td>185.9</td><td>45.0</td><td>58.5</td><td>38.7</td><td>43.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchase obligations ( c )</td><td>7450.4</td><td>2682.5</td><td>3169.4</td><td>1524.6</td><td>73.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total payments on contractual obligations</td><td>$ 10772.0</td><td>$ 2907.5</td><td>$ 3768.1</td><td>$ 2741.4</td><td>$ 1355.0</td></tr></table> total payments on contractual obligations $ 10772.0 $ 2907.5 $ 3768.1 $ 2741.4 $ 1355.0 ( a ) amounts reported in local currencies have been translated at the year-end exchange rates . ( b ) for variable rate facilities , amounts are based on interest rates in effect at year end . ( c ) the company 2019s purchase obligations include contracted amounts for aluminum , steel , plastic resin and other direct materials . also included are commitments for purchases of natural gas and electricity , aerospace and technologies contracts and other less significant items . in cases where variable prices and/or usage are involved , management 2019s best estimates have been used . depending on the circumstances , early termination of the contracts may not result in penalties and , therefore , actual payments could vary significantly . contributions to the company 2019s defined benefit pension plans , not including the unfunded german plans , are expected to be $ 69.1 million in 2007 . this estimate may change based on plan asset performance . benefit payments related to these plans are expected to be $ 62.6 million , $ 65.1 million , $ 68.9 million , $ 73.9 million and $ 75.1 million for the years ending december 31 , 2007 through 2011 , respectively , and $ 436.7 million combined for 2012 through 2016 . payments to participants in the unfunded german plans are expected to be $ 24.6 million , $ 25.1 million , $ 25.5 million , $ 25.9 million and $ 26.1 million in the years 2007 through 2011 , respectively , and a total of $ 136.6 million thereafter . we reduced our share repurchase program in 2006 to $ 45.7 million , net of issuances , compared to $ 358.1 million net repurchases in 2005 and $ 50 million in 2004 . the net repurchases in 2006 did not include a forward contract entered into in december 2006 for the repurchase of 1200000 shares . the contract was settled on january 5 , 2007 , for $ 51.9 million in cash . in 2007 we expect to repurchase approximately $ 175 million , net of issuances , and to reduce debt levels by more than $ 125 million . annual cash dividends paid on common stock were 40 cents per share in 2006 and 2005 and 35 cents per share in 2004 . total dividends paid were $ 41 million in 2006 , $ 42.5 million in 2005 and $ 38.9 million in 2004. .
Question: what was the value of share repurchases in 2005?
Answer: 358.1
Question: what was the value in 2004?
| 45.7 |
CONVFINQA4411 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 31 of 98 additional details about the company 2019s receivables sales agreement and debt are available in notes 6 and 12 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report . other liquidity items cash payments required for long-term debt maturities , rental payments under noncancellable operating leases and purchase obligations in effect at december 31 , 2006 , are summarized in the following table: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) less than1 year</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) 1-3 years</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) 3-5 years</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) more than 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 2301.6</td><td>$ 38.5</td><td>$ 278.4</td><td>$ 972.9</td><td>$ 1011.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital lease obligations</td><td>7.6</td><td>2.7</td><td>2.4</td><td>0.4</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest payments on long-term debt ( b )</td><td>826.5</td><td>138.8</td><td>259.4</td><td>204.8</td><td>223.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating leases</td><td>185.9</td><td>45.0</td><td>58.5</td><td>38.7</td><td>43.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchase obligations ( c )</td><td>7450.4</td><td>2682.5</td><td>3169.4</td><td>1524.6</td><td>73.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total payments on contractual obligations</td><td>$ 10772.0</td><td>$ 2907.5</td><td>$ 3768.1</td><td>$ 2741.4</td><td>$ 1355.0</td></tr></table> total payments on contractual obligations $ 10772.0 $ 2907.5 $ 3768.1 $ 2741.4 $ 1355.0 ( a ) amounts reported in local currencies have been translated at the year-end exchange rates . ( b ) for variable rate facilities , amounts are based on interest rates in effect at year end . ( c ) the company 2019s purchase obligations include contracted amounts for aluminum , steel , plastic resin and other direct materials . also included are commitments for purchases of natural gas and electricity , aerospace and technologies contracts and other less significant items . in cases where variable prices and/or usage are involved , management 2019s best estimates have been used . depending on the circumstances , early termination of the contracts may not result in penalties and , therefore , actual payments could vary significantly . contributions to the company 2019s defined benefit pension plans , not including the unfunded german plans , are expected to be $ 69.1 million in 2007 . this estimate may change based on plan asset performance . benefit payments related to these plans are expected to be $ 62.6 million , $ 65.1 million , $ 68.9 million , $ 73.9 million and $ 75.1 million for the years ending december 31 , 2007 through 2011 , respectively , and $ 436.7 million combined for 2012 through 2016 . payments to participants in the unfunded german plans are expected to be $ 24.6 million , $ 25.1 million , $ 25.5 million , $ 25.9 million and $ 26.1 million in the years 2007 through 2011 , respectively , and a total of $ 136.6 million thereafter . we reduced our share repurchase program in 2006 to $ 45.7 million , net of issuances , compared to $ 358.1 million net repurchases in 2005 and $ 50 million in 2004 . the net repurchases in 2006 did not include a forward contract entered into in december 2006 for the repurchase of 1200000 shares . the contract was settled on january 5 , 2007 , for $ 51.9 million in cash . in 2007 we expect to repurchase approximately $ 175 million , net of issuances , and to reduce debt levels by more than $ 125 million . annual cash dividends paid on common stock were 40 cents per share in 2006 and 2005 and 35 cents per share in 2004 . total dividends paid were $ 41 million in 2006 , $ 42.5 million in 2005 and $ 38.9 million in 2004. .
Question: what was the value of share repurchases in 2005?
Answer: 358.1
Question: what was the value in 2004?
Answer: 45.7
Question: what was the change in value?
| 312.4 |
CONVFINQA4412 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 31 of 98 additional details about the company 2019s receivables sales agreement and debt are available in notes 6 and 12 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report . other liquidity items cash payments required for long-term debt maturities , rental payments under noncancellable operating leases and purchase obligations in effect at december 31 , 2006 , are summarized in the following table: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) less than1 year</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) 1-3 years</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) 3-5 years</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) more than 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 2301.6</td><td>$ 38.5</td><td>$ 278.4</td><td>$ 972.9</td><td>$ 1011.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital lease obligations</td><td>7.6</td><td>2.7</td><td>2.4</td><td>0.4</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest payments on long-term debt ( b )</td><td>826.5</td><td>138.8</td><td>259.4</td><td>204.8</td><td>223.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating leases</td><td>185.9</td><td>45.0</td><td>58.5</td><td>38.7</td><td>43.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchase obligations ( c )</td><td>7450.4</td><td>2682.5</td><td>3169.4</td><td>1524.6</td><td>73.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total payments on contractual obligations</td><td>$ 10772.0</td><td>$ 2907.5</td><td>$ 3768.1</td><td>$ 2741.4</td><td>$ 1355.0</td></tr></table> total payments on contractual obligations $ 10772.0 $ 2907.5 $ 3768.1 $ 2741.4 $ 1355.0 ( a ) amounts reported in local currencies have been translated at the year-end exchange rates . ( b ) for variable rate facilities , amounts are based on interest rates in effect at year end . ( c ) the company 2019s purchase obligations include contracted amounts for aluminum , steel , plastic resin and other direct materials . also included are commitments for purchases of natural gas and electricity , aerospace and technologies contracts and other less significant items . in cases where variable prices and/or usage are involved , management 2019s best estimates have been used . depending on the circumstances , early termination of the contracts may not result in penalties and , therefore , actual payments could vary significantly . contributions to the company 2019s defined benefit pension plans , not including the unfunded german plans , are expected to be $ 69.1 million in 2007 . this estimate may change based on plan asset performance . benefit payments related to these plans are expected to be $ 62.6 million , $ 65.1 million , $ 68.9 million , $ 73.9 million and $ 75.1 million for the years ending december 31 , 2007 through 2011 , respectively , and $ 436.7 million combined for 2012 through 2016 . payments to participants in the unfunded german plans are expected to be $ 24.6 million , $ 25.1 million , $ 25.5 million , $ 25.9 million and $ 26.1 million in the years 2007 through 2011 , respectively , and a total of $ 136.6 million thereafter . we reduced our share repurchase program in 2006 to $ 45.7 million , net of issuances , compared to $ 358.1 million net repurchases in 2005 and $ 50 million in 2004 . the net repurchases in 2006 did not include a forward contract entered into in december 2006 for the repurchase of 1200000 shares . the contract was settled on january 5 , 2007 , for $ 51.9 million in cash . in 2007 we expect to repurchase approximately $ 175 million , net of issuances , and to reduce debt levels by more than $ 125 million . annual cash dividends paid on common stock were 40 cents per share in 2006 and 2005 and 35 cents per share in 2004 . total dividends paid were $ 41 million in 2006 , $ 42.5 million in 2005 and $ 38.9 million in 2004. .
Question: what was the value of share repurchases in 2005?
Answer: 358.1
Question: what was the value in 2004?
Answer: 45.7
Question: what was the change in value?
Answer: 312.4
Question: what was the percent change?
| 0.87238 |
CONVFINQA4413 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 204 on the amount of interest income recognized in the firm 2019s consolidated statements of income since that date . ( b ) other changes in expected cash flows include the net impact of changes in esti- mated prepayments and reclassifications to the nonaccretable difference . on a quarterly basis , the firm updates the amount of loan principal and interest cash flows expected to be collected , incorporating assumptions regarding default rates , loss severities , the amounts and timing of prepayments and other factors that are reflective of current market conditions . probable decreases in expected loan principal cash flows trigger the recognition of impairment , which is then measured as the present value of the expected principal loss plus any related foregone interest cash flows discounted at the pool 2019s effective interest rate . impairments that occur after the acquisition date are recognized through the provision and allow- ance for loan losses . probable and significant increases in expected principal cash flows would first reverse any previously recorded allowance for loan losses ; any remaining increases are recognized prospectively as interest income . the impacts of ( i ) prepayments , ( ii ) changes in variable interest rates , and ( iii ) any other changes in the timing of expected cash flows are recognized prospectively as adjustments to interest income . disposals of loans , which may include sales of loans , receipt of payments in full by the borrower , or foreclosure , result in removal of the loan from the purchased credit-impaired portfolio . if the timing and/or amounts of expected cash flows on these purchased credit-impaired loans were determined not to be rea- sonably estimable , no interest would be accreted and the loans would be reported as nonperforming loans ; however , since the timing and amounts of expected cash flows for these purchased credit-impaired loans are reasonably estimable , interest is being accreted and the loans are being reported as performing loans . charge-offs are not recorded on purchased credit-impaired loans until actual losses exceed the estimated losses that were recorded as purchase accounting adjustments at acquisition date . to date , no charge-offs have been recorded for these loans . purchased credit-impaired loans acquired in the washington mu- tual transaction are reported in loans on the firm 2019s consolidated balance sheets . in 2009 , an allowance for loan losses of $ 1.6 billion was recorded for the prime mortgage and option arm pools of loans . the net aggregate carrying amount of the pools that have an allowance for loan losses was $ 47.2 billion at december 31 , 2009 . this allowance for loan losses is reported as a reduction of the carrying amount of the loans in the table below . the table below provides additional information about these pur- chased credit-impaired consumer loans. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding balance ( a )</td><td>$ 103369</td><td>$ 118180</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>carrying amount</td><td>79664</td><td>88813</td></tr></table> ( a ) represents the sum of contractual principal , interest and fees earned at the reporting date . purchased credit-impaired loans are also being modified under the mha programs and the firm 2019s other loss mitigation programs . for these loans , the impact of the modification is incorporated into the firm 2019s quarterly assessment of whether a probable and/or signifi- cant change in estimated future cash flows has occurred , and the loans continue to be accounted for as and reported as purchased credit-impaired loans . foreclosed property the firm acquires property from borrowers through loan restructur- ings , workouts , and foreclosures , which is recorded in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets . property acquired may include real property ( e.g. , land , buildings , and fixtures ) and commercial and personal property ( e.g. , aircraft , railcars , and ships ) . acquired property is valued at fair value less costs to sell at acquisition . each quarter the fair value of the acquired property is reviewed and adjusted , if necessary . any adjustments to fair value in the first 90 days are charged to the allowance for loan losses and thereafter adjustments are charged/credited to noninterest revenue 2013other . operating expense , such as real estate taxes and maintenance , are charged to other expense . note 14 2013 allowance for credit losses the allowance for loan losses includes an asset-specific component , a formula-based component and a component related to purchased credit-impaired loans . the asset-specific component relates to loans considered to be impaired , which includes any loans that have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring as well as risk-rated loans that have been placed on nonaccrual status . an asset-specific allowance for impaired loans is established when the loan 2019s discounted cash flows ( or , when available , the loan 2019s observable market price ) is lower than the recorded investment in the loan . to compute the asset-specific component of the allowance , larger loans are evaluated individually , while smaller loans are evaluated as pools using historical loss experience for the respective class of assets . risk-rated loans ( primarily wholesale loans ) are pooled by risk rating , while scored loans ( i.e. , consumer loans ) are pooled by product type . the firm generally measures the asset-specific allowance as the difference between the recorded investment in the loan and the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected , dis- counted at the loan 2019s original effective interest rate . subsequent changes in measured impairment due to the impact of discounting are reported as an adjustment to the provision for loan losses , not as an adjustment to interest income . an asset-specific allowance for an impaired loan with an observable market price is measured as the difference between the recorded investment in the loan and the loan 2019s fair value . certain impaired loans that are determined to be collateral- dependent are charged-off to the fair value of the collateral less costs to sell . when collateral-dependent commercial real-estate loans are determined to be impaired , updated appraisals are typi- cally obtained and updated every six to twelve months . the firm also considers both borrower- and market-specific factors , which .
Question: what percentage of the net aggregate carrying amount did the firm record as its allowance for loan losses in 2009?
| 0.0339 |
CONVFINQA4414 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 204 on the amount of interest income recognized in the firm 2019s consolidated statements of income since that date . ( b ) other changes in expected cash flows include the net impact of changes in esti- mated prepayments and reclassifications to the nonaccretable difference . on a quarterly basis , the firm updates the amount of loan principal and interest cash flows expected to be collected , incorporating assumptions regarding default rates , loss severities , the amounts and timing of prepayments and other factors that are reflective of current market conditions . probable decreases in expected loan principal cash flows trigger the recognition of impairment , which is then measured as the present value of the expected principal loss plus any related foregone interest cash flows discounted at the pool 2019s effective interest rate . impairments that occur after the acquisition date are recognized through the provision and allow- ance for loan losses . probable and significant increases in expected principal cash flows would first reverse any previously recorded allowance for loan losses ; any remaining increases are recognized prospectively as interest income . the impacts of ( i ) prepayments , ( ii ) changes in variable interest rates , and ( iii ) any other changes in the timing of expected cash flows are recognized prospectively as adjustments to interest income . disposals of loans , which may include sales of loans , receipt of payments in full by the borrower , or foreclosure , result in removal of the loan from the purchased credit-impaired portfolio . if the timing and/or amounts of expected cash flows on these purchased credit-impaired loans were determined not to be rea- sonably estimable , no interest would be accreted and the loans would be reported as nonperforming loans ; however , since the timing and amounts of expected cash flows for these purchased credit-impaired loans are reasonably estimable , interest is being accreted and the loans are being reported as performing loans . charge-offs are not recorded on purchased credit-impaired loans until actual losses exceed the estimated losses that were recorded as purchase accounting adjustments at acquisition date . to date , no charge-offs have been recorded for these loans . purchased credit-impaired loans acquired in the washington mu- tual transaction are reported in loans on the firm 2019s consolidated balance sheets . in 2009 , an allowance for loan losses of $ 1.6 billion was recorded for the prime mortgage and option arm pools of loans . the net aggregate carrying amount of the pools that have an allowance for loan losses was $ 47.2 billion at december 31 , 2009 . this allowance for loan losses is reported as a reduction of the carrying amount of the loans in the table below . the table below provides additional information about these pur- chased credit-impaired consumer loans. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding balance ( a )</td><td>$ 103369</td><td>$ 118180</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>carrying amount</td><td>79664</td><td>88813</td></tr></table> ( a ) represents the sum of contractual principal , interest and fees earned at the reporting date . purchased credit-impaired loans are also being modified under the mha programs and the firm 2019s other loss mitigation programs . for these loans , the impact of the modification is incorporated into the firm 2019s quarterly assessment of whether a probable and/or signifi- cant change in estimated future cash flows has occurred , and the loans continue to be accounted for as and reported as purchased credit-impaired loans . foreclosed property the firm acquires property from borrowers through loan restructur- ings , workouts , and foreclosures , which is recorded in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets . property acquired may include real property ( e.g. , land , buildings , and fixtures ) and commercial and personal property ( e.g. , aircraft , railcars , and ships ) . acquired property is valued at fair value less costs to sell at acquisition . each quarter the fair value of the acquired property is reviewed and adjusted , if necessary . any adjustments to fair value in the first 90 days are charged to the allowance for loan losses and thereafter adjustments are charged/credited to noninterest revenue 2013other . operating expense , such as real estate taxes and maintenance , are charged to other expense . note 14 2013 allowance for credit losses the allowance for loan losses includes an asset-specific component , a formula-based component and a component related to purchased credit-impaired loans . the asset-specific component relates to loans considered to be impaired , which includes any loans that have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring as well as risk-rated loans that have been placed on nonaccrual status . an asset-specific allowance for impaired loans is established when the loan 2019s discounted cash flows ( or , when available , the loan 2019s observable market price ) is lower than the recorded investment in the loan . to compute the asset-specific component of the allowance , larger loans are evaluated individually , while smaller loans are evaluated as pools using historical loss experience for the respective class of assets . risk-rated loans ( primarily wholesale loans ) are pooled by risk rating , while scored loans ( i.e. , consumer loans ) are pooled by product type . the firm generally measures the asset-specific allowance as the difference between the recorded investment in the loan and the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected , dis- counted at the loan 2019s original effective interest rate . subsequent changes in measured impairment due to the impact of discounting are reported as an adjustment to the provision for loan losses , not as an adjustment to interest income . an asset-specific allowance for an impaired loan with an observable market price is measured as the difference between the recorded investment in the loan and the loan 2019s fair value . certain impaired loans that are determined to be collateral- dependent are charged-off to the fair value of the collateral less costs to sell . when collateral-dependent commercial real-estate loans are determined to be impaired , updated appraisals are typi- cally obtained and updated every six to twelve months . the firm also considers both borrower- and market-specific factors , which .
Question: what percentage of the net aggregate carrying amount did the firm record as its allowance for loan losses in 2009?
Answer: 0.0339
Question: what was the ratio of the allowance for loan losses that were recorded for the prime mortgage to the net aggregate carrying amount of the pools?
| 0.0339 |
CONVFINQA4415 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
maturities of debt the scheduled maturities of the outstanding debt balances , excluding debt fair value adjustments as of december 31 , 2014 , are summarized as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 2717</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>1684</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>3059</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2018</td><td>2328</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2019</td><td>2819</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>28422</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 41029</td></tr></table> _______ interest rates , interest rate swaps and contingent debt the weighted average interest rate on all of our borrowings was 5.02% ( 5.02 % ) during 2014 and 5.08% ( 5.08 % ) during 2013 . information on our interest rate swaps is contained in note 13 . for information about our contingent debt agreements , see note 12 . subsequent event subsequent to december 31 , 2014 , additional ep trust i preferred securities were converted , primarily consisting of 969117 ep trust i preferred securities converted on january 14 , 2015 , into ( i ) 697473 of our class p common stock ; ( ii ) approximately $ 24 million in cash ; and ( iii ) 1066028 in warrants . 9 . share-based compensation and employee benefits share-based compensation kinder morgan , inc . class p shares stock compensation plan for non-employee directors we have a stock compensation plan for non-employee directors , in which our eligible non-employee directors participate . the plan recognizes that the compensation paid to each eligible non-employee director is fixed by our board , generally annually , and that the compensation is payable in cash . pursuant to the plan , in lieu of receiving some or all of the cash compensation , each eligible non-employee director may elect to receive shares of class p common stock . each election will be generally at or around the first board meeting in january of each calendar year and will be effective for the entire calendar year . an eligible director may make a new election each calendar year . the total number of shares of class p common stock authorized under the plan is 250000 . during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we made restricted class p common stock grants to our non-employee directors of 6210 , 5710 and 5520 , respectively . these grants were valued at time of issuance at $ 220000 , $ 210000 and $ 185000 , respectively . all of the restricted stock grants made to non-employee directors vest during a six-month period . table of contents .
Question: as of december 31, 2014, what amount from the total maturities of debt were due after 2019?
| 28422.0 |
CONVFINQA4416 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
maturities of debt the scheduled maturities of the outstanding debt balances , excluding debt fair value adjustments as of december 31 , 2014 , are summarized as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 2717</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>1684</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>3059</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2018</td><td>2328</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2019</td><td>2819</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>28422</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 41029</td></tr></table> _______ interest rates , interest rate swaps and contingent debt the weighted average interest rate on all of our borrowings was 5.02% ( 5.02 % ) during 2014 and 5.08% ( 5.08 % ) during 2013 . information on our interest rate swaps is contained in note 13 . for information about our contingent debt agreements , see note 12 . subsequent event subsequent to december 31 , 2014 , additional ep trust i preferred securities were converted , primarily consisting of 969117 ep trust i preferred securities converted on january 14 , 2015 , into ( i ) 697473 of our class p common stock ; ( ii ) approximately $ 24 million in cash ; and ( iii ) 1066028 in warrants . 9 . share-based compensation and employee benefits share-based compensation kinder morgan , inc . class p shares stock compensation plan for non-employee directors we have a stock compensation plan for non-employee directors , in which our eligible non-employee directors participate . the plan recognizes that the compensation paid to each eligible non-employee director is fixed by our board , generally annually , and that the compensation is payable in cash . pursuant to the plan , in lieu of receiving some or all of the cash compensation , each eligible non-employee director may elect to receive shares of class p common stock . each election will be generally at or around the first board meeting in january of each calendar year and will be effective for the entire calendar year . an eligible director may make a new election each calendar year . the total number of shares of class p common stock authorized under the plan is 250000 . during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we made restricted class p common stock grants to our non-employee directors of 6210 , 5710 and 5520 , respectively . these grants were valued at time of issuance at $ 220000 , $ 210000 and $ 185000 , respectively . all of the restricted stock grants made to non-employee directors vest during a six-month period . table of contents .
Question: as of december 31, 2014, what amount from the total maturities of debt were due after 2019?
Answer: 28422.0
Question: and what was the total of those maturities?
| 41029.0 |
CONVFINQA4417 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
maturities of debt the scheduled maturities of the outstanding debt balances , excluding debt fair value adjustments as of december 31 , 2014 , are summarized as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 2717</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>1684</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>3059</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2018</td><td>2328</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2019</td><td>2819</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>28422</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 41029</td></tr></table> _______ interest rates , interest rate swaps and contingent debt the weighted average interest rate on all of our borrowings was 5.02% ( 5.02 % ) during 2014 and 5.08% ( 5.08 % ) during 2013 . information on our interest rate swaps is contained in note 13 . for information about our contingent debt agreements , see note 12 . subsequent event subsequent to december 31 , 2014 , additional ep trust i preferred securities were converted , primarily consisting of 969117 ep trust i preferred securities converted on january 14 , 2015 , into ( i ) 697473 of our class p common stock ; ( ii ) approximately $ 24 million in cash ; and ( iii ) 1066028 in warrants . 9 . share-based compensation and employee benefits share-based compensation kinder morgan , inc . class p shares stock compensation plan for non-employee directors we have a stock compensation plan for non-employee directors , in which our eligible non-employee directors participate . the plan recognizes that the compensation paid to each eligible non-employee director is fixed by our board , generally annually , and that the compensation is payable in cash . pursuant to the plan , in lieu of receiving some or all of the cash compensation , each eligible non-employee director may elect to receive shares of class p common stock . each election will be generally at or around the first board meeting in january of each calendar year and will be effective for the entire calendar year . an eligible director may make a new election each calendar year . the total number of shares of class p common stock authorized under the plan is 250000 . during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we made restricted class p common stock grants to our non-employee directors of 6210 , 5710 and 5520 , respectively . these grants were valued at time of issuance at $ 220000 , $ 210000 and $ 185000 , respectively . all of the restricted stock grants made to non-employee directors vest during a six-month period . table of contents .
Question: as of december 31, 2014, what amount from the total maturities of debt were due after 2019?
Answer: 28422.0
Question: and what was the total of those maturities?
Answer: 41029.0
Question: what percentage, then, of this total, did that amount represent?
| 0.69273 |
CONVFINQA4418 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
maturities of debt the scheduled maturities of the outstanding debt balances , excluding debt fair value adjustments as of december 31 , 2014 , are summarized as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 2717</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>1684</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>3059</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2018</td><td>2328</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2019</td><td>2819</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>28422</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 41029</td></tr></table> _______ interest rates , interest rate swaps and contingent debt the weighted average interest rate on all of our borrowings was 5.02% ( 5.02 % ) during 2014 and 5.08% ( 5.08 % ) during 2013 . information on our interest rate swaps is contained in note 13 . for information about our contingent debt agreements , see note 12 . subsequent event subsequent to december 31 , 2014 , additional ep trust i preferred securities were converted , primarily consisting of 969117 ep trust i preferred securities converted on january 14 , 2015 , into ( i ) 697473 of our class p common stock ; ( ii ) approximately $ 24 million in cash ; and ( iii ) 1066028 in warrants . 9 . share-based compensation and employee benefits share-based compensation kinder morgan , inc . class p shares stock compensation plan for non-employee directors we have a stock compensation plan for non-employee directors , in which our eligible non-employee directors participate . the plan recognizes that the compensation paid to each eligible non-employee director is fixed by our board , generally annually , and that the compensation is payable in cash . pursuant to the plan , in lieu of receiving some or all of the cash compensation , each eligible non-employee director may elect to receive shares of class p common stock . each election will be generally at or around the first board meeting in january of each calendar year and will be effective for the entire calendar year . an eligible director may make a new election each calendar year . the total number of shares of class p common stock authorized under the plan is 250000 . during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we made restricted class p common stock grants to our non-employee directors of 6210 , 5710 and 5520 , respectively . these grants were valued at time of issuance at $ 220000 , $ 210000 and $ 185000 , respectively . all of the restricted stock grants made to non-employee directors vest during a six-month period . table of contents .
Question: as of december 31, 2014, what amount from the total maturities of debt were due after 2019?
Answer: 28422.0
Question: and what was the total of those maturities?
Answer: 41029.0
Question: what percentage, then, of this total, did that amount represent?
Answer: 0.69273
Question: and what was the amount of debt that was due prior to 2019?
| 12607.0 |
CONVFINQA4419 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
maturities of debt the scheduled maturities of the outstanding debt balances , excluding debt fair value adjustments as of december 31 , 2014 , are summarized as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 2717</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>1684</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>3059</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2018</td><td>2328</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2019</td><td>2819</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>28422</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 41029</td></tr></table> _______ interest rates , interest rate swaps and contingent debt the weighted average interest rate on all of our borrowings was 5.02% ( 5.02 % ) during 2014 and 5.08% ( 5.08 % ) during 2013 . information on our interest rate swaps is contained in note 13 . for information about our contingent debt agreements , see note 12 . subsequent event subsequent to december 31 , 2014 , additional ep trust i preferred securities were converted , primarily consisting of 969117 ep trust i preferred securities converted on january 14 , 2015 , into ( i ) 697473 of our class p common stock ; ( ii ) approximately $ 24 million in cash ; and ( iii ) 1066028 in warrants . 9 . share-based compensation and employee benefits share-based compensation kinder morgan , inc . class p shares stock compensation plan for non-employee directors we have a stock compensation plan for non-employee directors , in which our eligible non-employee directors participate . the plan recognizes that the compensation paid to each eligible non-employee director is fixed by our board , generally annually , and that the compensation is payable in cash . pursuant to the plan , in lieu of receiving some or all of the cash compensation , each eligible non-employee director may elect to receive shares of class p common stock . each election will be generally at or around the first board meeting in january of each calendar year and will be effective for the entire calendar year . an eligible director may make a new election each calendar year . the total number of shares of class p common stock authorized under the plan is 250000 . during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we made restricted class p common stock grants to our non-employee directors of 6210 , 5710 and 5520 , respectively . these grants were valued at time of issuance at $ 220000 , $ 210000 and $ 185000 , respectively . all of the restricted stock grants made to non-employee directors vest during a six-month period . table of contents .
Question: as of december 31, 2014, what amount from the total maturities of debt were due after 2019?
Answer: 28422.0
Question: and what was the total of those maturities?
Answer: 41029.0
Question: what percentage, then, of this total, did that amount represent?
Answer: 0.69273
Question: and what was the amount of debt that was due prior to 2019?
Answer: 12607.0
Question: what percentage did this amount represent?
| 0.30727 |
CONVFINQA4420 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , c-5m super galaxy and f-22 raptor . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 15570</td><td>$ 14920</td><td>$ 14123</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1681</td><td>1649</td><td>1612</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 31800</td><td>$ 27600</td><td>$ 28000</td></tr></table> 2015 compared to 2014 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2015 increased $ 650 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.4 billion for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 150 million for the c-5 program due to increased deliveries ( nine aircraft delivered in 2015 compared to seven delivered in 2014 ) . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 350 million for the c-130 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries ( 21 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 24 delivered in 2014 ) , lower sustainment activities and aircraft contract mix ; approximately $ 200 million due to decreased volume and lower risk retirements on various programs ; approximately $ 195 million for the f-16 program due to fewer deliveries ( 11 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 17 delivered in 2014 ) ; and approximately $ 190 million for the f-22 program as a result of decreased sustainment activities . aeronautics 2019 operating profit in 2015 increased $ 32 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2014 . operating profit increased by approximately $ 240 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and risk retirements ; and approximately $ 40 million for the c-5 program due to increased risk retirements . these increases were offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 90 million for the f-22 program due to lower risk retirements ; approximately $ 70 million for the c-130 program as a result of the reasons stated above for lower net sales ; and approximately $ 80 million due to decreased volume and risk retirements on various programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 100 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 aeronautics 2019 net sales increased $ 797 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 790 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and sustainment activities ; about $ 55 million for the f-16 program due to increased deliveries ( 17 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 13 delivered in 2013 ) partially offset by contract mix ; and approximately $ 45 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 55 million for the f-35 development contract due to decreased volume , partially offset by the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; and about $ 40 million for the c-130 program due to fewer deliveries ( 24 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 25 delivered in 2013 ) and decreased sustainment activities , partially offset by contract mix . aeronautics 2019 operating profit increased $ 37 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for the f-35 development contract due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; about $ 75 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million for the c-130 program due to increased risk retirements and contract mix , partially offset by fewer deliveries ; and about $ 25 million for the c-5 program due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 130 million for the f-16 program due to decreased risk retirements , partially offset by increased deliveries ; and about $ 70 million for sustainment activities due to decreased risk retirements and volume . operating profit was comparable for f-35 production contracts as higher volume was offset by lower risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013. .
Question: what was the backlog value at the end of 2015?
| 31800.0 |
CONVFINQA4421 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , c-5m super galaxy and f-22 raptor . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 15570</td><td>$ 14920</td><td>$ 14123</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1681</td><td>1649</td><td>1612</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 31800</td><td>$ 27600</td><td>$ 28000</td></tr></table> 2015 compared to 2014 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2015 increased $ 650 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.4 billion for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 150 million for the c-5 program due to increased deliveries ( nine aircraft delivered in 2015 compared to seven delivered in 2014 ) . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 350 million for the c-130 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries ( 21 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 24 delivered in 2014 ) , lower sustainment activities and aircraft contract mix ; approximately $ 200 million due to decreased volume and lower risk retirements on various programs ; approximately $ 195 million for the f-16 program due to fewer deliveries ( 11 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 17 delivered in 2014 ) ; and approximately $ 190 million for the f-22 program as a result of decreased sustainment activities . aeronautics 2019 operating profit in 2015 increased $ 32 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2014 . operating profit increased by approximately $ 240 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and risk retirements ; and approximately $ 40 million for the c-5 program due to increased risk retirements . these increases were offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 90 million for the f-22 program due to lower risk retirements ; approximately $ 70 million for the c-130 program as a result of the reasons stated above for lower net sales ; and approximately $ 80 million due to decreased volume and risk retirements on various programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 100 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 aeronautics 2019 net sales increased $ 797 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 790 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and sustainment activities ; about $ 55 million for the f-16 program due to increased deliveries ( 17 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 13 delivered in 2013 ) partially offset by contract mix ; and approximately $ 45 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 55 million for the f-35 development contract due to decreased volume , partially offset by the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; and about $ 40 million for the c-130 program due to fewer deliveries ( 24 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 25 delivered in 2013 ) and decreased sustainment activities , partially offset by contract mix . aeronautics 2019 operating profit increased $ 37 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for the f-35 development contract due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; about $ 75 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million for the c-130 program due to increased risk retirements and contract mix , partially offset by fewer deliveries ; and about $ 25 million for the c-5 program due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 130 million for the f-16 program due to decreased risk retirements , partially offset by increased deliveries ; and about $ 70 million for sustainment activities due to decreased risk retirements and volume . operating profit was comparable for f-35 production contracts as higher volume was offset by lower risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013. .
Question: what was the backlog value at the end of 2015?
Answer: 31800.0
Question: what was the backlog value at the end of 2014?
| 27600.0 |
CONVFINQA4422 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , c-5m super galaxy and f-22 raptor . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 15570</td><td>$ 14920</td><td>$ 14123</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1681</td><td>1649</td><td>1612</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 31800</td><td>$ 27600</td><td>$ 28000</td></tr></table> 2015 compared to 2014 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2015 increased $ 650 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.4 billion for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 150 million for the c-5 program due to increased deliveries ( nine aircraft delivered in 2015 compared to seven delivered in 2014 ) . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 350 million for the c-130 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries ( 21 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 24 delivered in 2014 ) , lower sustainment activities and aircraft contract mix ; approximately $ 200 million due to decreased volume and lower risk retirements on various programs ; approximately $ 195 million for the f-16 program due to fewer deliveries ( 11 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 17 delivered in 2014 ) ; and approximately $ 190 million for the f-22 program as a result of decreased sustainment activities . aeronautics 2019 operating profit in 2015 increased $ 32 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2014 . operating profit increased by approximately $ 240 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and risk retirements ; and approximately $ 40 million for the c-5 program due to increased risk retirements . these increases were offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 90 million for the f-22 program due to lower risk retirements ; approximately $ 70 million for the c-130 program as a result of the reasons stated above for lower net sales ; and approximately $ 80 million due to decreased volume and risk retirements on various programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 100 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 aeronautics 2019 net sales increased $ 797 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 790 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and sustainment activities ; about $ 55 million for the f-16 program due to increased deliveries ( 17 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 13 delivered in 2013 ) partially offset by contract mix ; and approximately $ 45 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 55 million for the f-35 development contract due to decreased volume , partially offset by the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; and about $ 40 million for the c-130 program due to fewer deliveries ( 24 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 25 delivered in 2013 ) and decreased sustainment activities , partially offset by contract mix . aeronautics 2019 operating profit increased $ 37 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for the f-35 development contract due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; about $ 75 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million for the c-130 program due to increased risk retirements and contract mix , partially offset by fewer deliveries ; and about $ 25 million for the c-5 program due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 130 million for the f-16 program due to decreased risk retirements , partially offset by increased deliveries ; and about $ 70 million for sustainment activities due to decreased risk retirements and volume . operating profit was comparable for f-35 production contracts as higher volume was offset by lower risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013. .
Question: what was the backlog value at the end of 2015?
Answer: 31800.0
Question: what was the backlog value at the end of 2014?
Answer: 27600.0
Question: what is the sum of the backlog value in 2014 and 2015?
| 59400.0 |
CONVFINQA4423 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , c-5m super galaxy and f-22 raptor . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 15570</td><td>$ 14920</td><td>$ 14123</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1681</td><td>1649</td><td>1612</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 31800</td><td>$ 27600</td><td>$ 28000</td></tr></table> 2015 compared to 2014 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2015 increased $ 650 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.4 billion for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 150 million for the c-5 program due to increased deliveries ( nine aircraft delivered in 2015 compared to seven delivered in 2014 ) . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 350 million for the c-130 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries ( 21 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 24 delivered in 2014 ) , lower sustainment activities and aircraft contract mix ; approximately $ 200 million due to decreased volume and lower risk retirements on various programs ; approximately $ 195 million for the f-16 program due to fewer deliveries ( 11 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 17 delivered in 2014 ) ; and approximately $ 190 million for the f-22 program as a result of decreased sustainment activities . aeronautics 2019 operating profit in 2015 increased $ 32 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2014 . operating profit increased by approximately $ 240 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and risk retirements ; and approximately $ 40 million for the c-5 program due to increased risk retirements . these increases were offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 90 million for the f-22 program due to lower risk retirements ; approximately $ 70 million for the c-130 program as a result of the reasons stated above for lower net sales ; and approximately $ 80 million due to decreased volume and risk retirements on various programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 100 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 aeronautics 2019 net sales increased $ 797 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 790 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and sustainment activities ; about $ 55 million for the f-16 program due to increased deliveries ( 17 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 13 delivered in 2013 ) partially offset by contract mix ; and approximately $ 45 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 55 million for the f-35 development contract due to decreased volume , partially offset by the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; and about $ 40 million for the c-130 program due to fewer deliveries ( 24 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 25 delivered in 2013 ) and decreased sustainment activities , partially offset by contract mix . aeronautics 2019 operating profit increased $ 37 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for the f-35 development contract due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; about $ 75 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million for the c-130 program due to increased risk retirements and contract mix , partially offset by fewer deliveries ; and about $ 25 million for the c-5 program due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 130 million for the f-16 program due to decreased risk retirements , partially offset by increased deliveries ; and about $ 70 million for sustainment activities due to decreased risk retirements and volume . operating profit was comparable for f-35 production contracts as higher volume was offset by lower risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013. .
Question: what was the backlog value at the end of 2015?
Answer: 31800.0
Question: what was the backlog value at the end of 2014?
Answer: 27600.0
Question: what is the sum of the backlog value in 2014 and 2015?
Answer: 59400.0
Question: what was the backlog value at the end of 2013?
| 28000.0 |
CONVFINQA4424 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , c-5m super galaxy and f-22 raptor . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 15570</td><td>$ 14920</td><td>$ 14123</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1681</td><td>1649</td><td>1612</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 31800</td><td>$ 27600</td><td>$ 28000</td></tr></table> 2015 compared to 2014 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2015 increased $ 650 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.4 billion for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 150 million for the c-5 program due to increased deliveries ( nine aircraft delivered in 2015 compared to seven delivered in 2014 ) . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 350 million for the c-130 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries ( 21 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 24 delivered in 2014 ) , lower sustainment activities and aircraft contract mix ; approximately $ 200 million due to decreased volume and lower risk retirements on various programs ; approximately $ 195 million for the f-16 program due to fewer deliveries ( 11 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 17 delivered in 2014 ) ; and approximately $ 190 million for the f-22 program as a result of decreased sustainment activities . aeronautics 2019 operating profit in 2015 increased $ 32 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2014 . operating profit increased by approximately $ 240 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and risk retirements ; and approximately $ 40 million for the c-5 program due to increased risk retirements . these increases were offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 90 million for the f-22 program due to lower risk retirements ; approximately $ 70 million for the c-130 program as a result of the reasons stated above for lower net sales ; and approximately $ 80 million due to decreased volume and risk retirements on various programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 100 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 aeronautics 2019 net sales increased $ 797 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 790 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and sustainment activities ; about $ 55 million for the f-16 program due to increased deliveries ( 17 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 13 delivered in 2013 ) partially offset by contract mix ; and approximately $ 45 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 55 million for the f-35 development contract due to decreased volume , partially offset by the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; and about $ 40 million for the c-130 program due to fewer deliveries ( 24 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 25 delivered in 2013 ) and decreased sustainment activities , partially offset by contract mix . aeronautics 2019 operating profit increased $ 37 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for the f-35 development contract due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; about $ 75 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million for the c-130 program due to increased risk retirements and contract mix , partially offset by fewer deliveries ; and about $ 25 million for the c-5 program due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 130 million for the f-16 program due to decreased risk retirements , partially offset by increased deliveries ; and about $ 70 million for sustainment activities due to decreased risk retirements and volume . operating profit was comparable for f-35 production contracts as higher volume was offset by lower risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013. .
Question: what was the backlog value at the end of 2015?
Answer: 31800.0
Question: what was the backlog value at the end of 2014?
Answer: 27600.0
Question: what is the sum of the backlog value in 2014 and 2015?
Answer: 59400.0
Question: what was the backlog value at the end of 2013?
Answer: 28000.0
Question: what is the sum of the backlog value for 2013, 2014 and 2015?
| 87400.0 |
CONVFINQA4425 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , c-5m super galaxy and f-22 raptor . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 15570</td><td>$ 14920</td><td>$ 14123</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1681</td><td>1649</td><td>1612</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 31800</td><td>$ 27600</td><td>$ 28000</td></tr></table> 2015 compared to 2014 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2015 increased $ 650 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.4 billion for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 150 million for the c-5 program due to increased deliveries ( nine aircraft delivered in 2015 compared to seven delivered in 2014 ) . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 350 million for the c-130 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries ( 21 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 24 delivered in 2014 ) , lower sustainment activities and aircraft contract mix ; approximately $ 200 million due to decreased volume and lower risk retirements on various programs ; approximately $ 195 million for the f-16 program due to fewer deliveries ( 11 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 17 delivered in 2014 ) ; and approximately $ 190 million for the f-22 program as a result of decreased sustainment activities . aeronautics 2019 operating profit in 2015 increased $ 32 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2014 . operating profit increased by approximately $ 240 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and risk retirements ; and approximately $ 40 million for the c-5 program due to increased risk retirements . these increases were offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 90 million for the f-22 program due to lower risk retirements ; approximately $ 70 million for the c-130 program as a result of the reasons stated above for lower net sales ; and approximately $ 80 million due to decreased volume and risk retirements on various programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 100 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 aeronautics 2019 net sales increased $ 797 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 790 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and sustainment activities ; about $ 55 million for the f-16 program due to increased deliveries ( 17 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 13 delivered in 2013 ) partially offset by contract mix ; and approximately $ 45 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 55 million for the f-35 development contract due to decreased volume , partially offset by the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; and about $ 40 million for the c-130 program due to fewer deliveries ( 24 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 25 delivered in 2013 ) and decreased sustainment activities , partially offset by contract mix . aeronautics 2019 operating profit increased $ 37 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for the f-35 development contract due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; about $ 75 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million for the c-130 program due to increased risk retirements and contract mix , partially offset by fewer deliveries ; and about $ 25 million for the c-5 program due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 130 million for the f-16 program due to decreased risk retirements , partially offset by increased deliveries ; and about $ 70 million for sustainment activities due to decreased risk retirements and volume . operating profit was comparable for f-35 production contracts as higher volume was offset by lower risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013. .
Question: what was the backlog value at the end of 2015?
Answer: 31800.0
Question: what was the backlog value at the end of 2014?
Answer: 27600.0
Question: what is the sum of the backlog value in 2014 and 2015?
Answer: 59400.0
Question: what was the backlog value at the end of 2013?
Answer: 28000.0
Question: what is the sum of the backlog value for 2013, 2014 and 2015?
Answer: 87400.0
Question: what is the average backlog value per year?
| 29133.33333 |
CONVFINQA4426 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our operating cash flows are significantly impacted by the seasonality of our businesses . we typically generate most of our operating cash flow in the third and fourth quarters of each year . in june 2015 , we issued $ 900 million of senior notes in a registered public offering . the senior notes consist of two tranches : $ 400 million of five-year notes due 2020 with a coupon of 3% ( 3 % ) and $ 500 million of ten-year notes due 2025 with a coupon of 4% ( 4 % ) . we used the proceeds from the senior notes offering to pay down our revolving credit facility and for general corporate purposes . on december 31 , 2017 , the outstanding amount of the senior notes , net of underwriting commissions and price discounts , was $ 892.6 million . cash flows below is a summary of cash flows for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 . ( in millions ) 2017 2016 2015 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 600.3</td><td>$ 650.5</td><td>$ 429.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-287.7 ( 287.7 )</td><td>-385.1 ( 385.1 )</td><td>-766.6 ( 766.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash ( used in ) provided by financing activities</td><td>-250.1 ( 250.1 )</td><td>-250.4 ( 250.4 )</td><td>398.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash</td><td>9.0</td><td>-2.0 ( 2.0 )</td><td>-14.8 ( 14.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net increase in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 71.5</td><td>$ 13.0</td><td>$ 46.6</td></tr></table> net cash provided by operating activities was $ 600.3 million in 2017 compared to $ 650.5 million in 2016 and $ 429.2 million in 2015 . the $ 50.2 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities from 2017 to 2016 was primarily due to higher build in working capital , primarily driven by higher inventory purchases in 2017 , partially offset by a higher net income . the $ 221.3 million increase in cash provided by operating activities from 2015 to 2016 was primarily due to a reduction in working capital in 2016 compared to 2015 and higher net income . net cash used in investing activities was $ 287.7 million in 2017 compared to $ 385.1 million in 2016 and $ 766.6 million in 2015 . the decrease of $ 97.4 million from 2016 to 2017 was primarily due lower cost of acquisitions of $ 115.1 million , partially offset by $ 15.7 million of higher capital expenditures . the decrease of $ 381.5 million from 2015 to 2016 was primarily due the decrease in cost of acquisitions of $ 413.1 million , partially offset by $ 20.8 million of higher capital spending . net cash used in financing activities was $ 250.1 million in 2017 compared to net cash used in financing activities of $ 250.4 million in 2016 and net cash provided by in financing activities of $ 398.8 million in 2015 . the change of $ 649.2 million in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to $ 372.8 million of higher share repurchases and lower net borrowings of $ 240.8 million . pension plans subsidiaries of fortune brands sponsor their respective defined benefit pension plans that are funded by a portfolio of investments maintained within our benefit plan trust . in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , we contributed $ 28.4 million , zero and $ 2.3 million , respectively , to qualified pension plans . in 2018 , we expect to make pension contributions of approximately $ 12.8 million . as of december 31 , 2017 , the fair value of our total pension plan assets was $ 656.6 million , representing funding of 79% ( 79 % ) of the accumulated benefit obligation liability . for the foreseeable future , we believe that we have sufficient liquidity to meet the minimum funding that may be required by the pension protection act of 2006 . foreign exchange we have operations in various foreign countries , principally canada , china , mexico , the united kingdom , france , australia and japan . therefore , changes in the value of the related currencies affect our financial statements when translated into u.s . dollars. .
Question: in 6/15, what percentage of the five-year notes due in 2020 had a coupon of 3%?
| 0.44444 |
CONVFINQA4427 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our operating cash flows are significantly impacted by the seasonality of our businesses . we typically generate most of our operating cash flow in the third and fourth quarters of each year . in june 2015 , we issued $ 900 million of senior notes in a registered public offering . the senior notes consist of two tranches : $ 400 million of five-year notes due 2020 with a coupon of 3% ( 3 % ) and $ 500 million of ten-year notes due 2025 with a coupon of 4% ( 4 % ) . we used the proceeds from the senior notes offering to pay down our revolving credit facility and for general corporate purposes . on december 31 , 2017 , the outstanding amount of the senior notes , net of underwriting commissions and price discounts , was $ 892.6 million . cash flows below is a summary of cash flows for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 . ( in millions ) 2017 2016 2015 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 600.3</td><td>$ 650.5</td><td>$ 429.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-287.7 ( 287.7 )</td><td>-385.1 ( 385.1 )</td><td>-766.6 ( 766.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash ( used in ) provided by financing activities</td><td>-250.1 ( 250.1 )</td><td>-250.4 ( 250.4 )</td><td>398.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash</td><td>9.0</td><td>-2.0 ( 2.0 )</td><td>-14.8 ( 14.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net increase in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 71.5</td><td>$ 13.0</td><td>$ 46.6</td></tr></table> net cash provided by operating activities was $ 600.3 million in 2017 compared to $ 650.5 million in 2016 and $ 429.2 million in 2015 . the $ 50.2 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities from 2017 to 2016 was primarily due to higher build in working capital , primarily driven by higher inventory purchases in 2017 , partially offset by a higher net income . the $ 221.3 million increase in cash provided by operating activities from 2015 to 2016 was primarily due to a reduction in working capital in 2016 compared to 2015 and higher net income . net cash used in investing activities was $ 287.7 million in 2017 compared to $ 385.1 million in 2016 and $ 766.6 million in 2015 . the decrease of $ 97.4 million from 2016 to 2017 was primarily due lower cost of acquisitions of $ 115.1 million , partially offset by $ 15.7 million of higher capital expenditures . the decrease of $ 381.5 million from 2015 to 2016 was primarily due the decrease in cost of acquisitions of $ 413.1 million , partially offset by $ 20.8 million of higher capital spending . net cash used in financing activities was $ 250.1 million in 2017 compared to net cash used in financing activities of $ 250.4 million in 2016 and net cash provided by in financing activities of $ 398.8 million in 2015 . the change of $ 649.2 million in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to $ 372.8 million of higher share repurchases and lower net borrowings of $ 240.8 million . pension plans subsidiaries of fortune brands sponsor their respective defined benefit pension plans that are funded by a portfolio of investments maintained within our benefit plan trust . in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , we contributed $ 28.4 million , zero and $ 2.3 million , respectively , to qualified pension plans . in 2018 , we expect to make pension contributions of approximately $ 12.8 million . as of december 31 , 2017 , the fair value of our total pension plan assets was $ 656.6 million , representing funding of 79% ( 79 % ) of the accumulated benefit obligation liability . for the foreseeable future , we believe that we have sufficient liquidity to meet the minimum funding that may be required by the pension protection act of 2006 . foreign exchange we have operations in various foreign countries , principally canada , china , mexico , the united kingdom , france , australia and japan . therefore , changes in the value of the related currencies affect our financial statements when translated into u.s . dollars. .
Question: in 6/15, what percentage of the five-year notes due in 2020 had a coupon of 3%?
Answer: 0.44444
Question: what was the ratio of the net cash provided by operating activities to the net cash used in investing activities in 2017?
| 2.08655 |
CONVFINQA4428 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation - continued three years ended december 31 , 2011 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) balance , december 31 , 2008................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2009................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2010................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2011................................................................................................................................... . $ 846258 103698 ( 11869 ) 938087 108261 ( 11144 ) 1035204 114180 ( 21796 ) $ 1127588 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance december 31 2008</td><td>$ 846258</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>103698</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-11869 ( 11869 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance december 31 2009</td><td>938087</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>108261</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-11144 ( 11144 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2010</td><td>1035204</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>114180</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-21796 ( 21796 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance december 31 2011</td><td>$ 1127588</td></tr></table> federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation - continued three years ended december 31 , 2011 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) balance , december 31 , 2008................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2009................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2010................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2011................................................................................................................................... . $ 846258 103698 ( 11869 ) 938087 108261 ( 11144 ) 1035204 114180 ( 21796 ) $ 1127588 .
Question: what was the value in 2009?
| 108261.0 |
CONVFINQA4429 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation - continued three years ended december 31 , 2011 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) balance , december 31 , 2008................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2009................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2010................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2011................................................................................................................................... . $ 846258 103698 ( 11869 ) 938087 108261 ( 11144 ) 1035204 114180 ( 21796 ) $ 1127588 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance december 31 2008</td><td>$ 846258</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>103698</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-11869 ( 11869 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance december 31 2009</td><td>938087</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>108261</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-11144 ( 11144 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2010</td><td>1035204</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>114180</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-21796 ( 21796 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance december 31 2011</td><td>$ 1127588</td></tr></table> federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation - continued three years ended december 31 , 2011 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) balance , december 31 , 2008................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2009................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2010................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2011................................................................................................................................... . $ 846258 103698 ( 11869 ) 938087 108261 ( 11144 ) 1035204 114180 ( 21796 ) $ 1127588 .
Question: what was the value in 2009?
Answer: 108261.0
Question: what was the value in 2008?
| 103698.0 |
CONVFINQA4430 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation - continued three years ended december 31 , 2011 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) balance , december 31 , 2008................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2009................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2010................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2011................................................................................................................................... . $ 846258 103698 ( 11869 ) 938087 108261 ( 11144 ) 1035204 114180 ( 21796 ) $ 1127588 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance december 31 2008</td><td>$ 846258</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>103698</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-11869 ( 11869 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance december 31 2009</td><td>938087</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>108261</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-11144 ( 11144 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2010</td><td>1035204</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>114180</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-21796 ( 21796 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance december 31 2011</td><td>$ 1127588</td></tr></table> federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation - continued three years ended december 31 , 2011 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) balance , december 31 , 2008................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2009................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2010................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2011................................................................................................................................... . $ 846258 103698 ( 11869 ) 938087 108261 ( 11144 ) 1035204 114180 ( 21796 ) $ 1127588 .
Question: what was the value in 2009?
Answer: 108261.0
Question: what was the value in 2008?
Answer: 103698.0
Question: what is the ratio of 2009 to 2008?
| 1.044 |
CONVFINQA4431 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation - continued three years ended december 31 , 2011 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) balance , december 31 , 2008................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2009................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2010................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2011................................................................................................................................... . $ 846258 103698 ( 11869 ) 938087 108261 ( 11144 ) 1035204 114180 ( 21796 ) $ 1127588 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance december 31 2008</td><td>$ 846258</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>103698</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-11869 ( 11869 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance december 31 2009</td><td>938087</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>108261</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-11144 ( 11144 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2010</td><td>1035204</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>114180</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-21796 ( 21796 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance december 31 2011</td><td>$ 1127588</td></tr></table> federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation - continued three years ended december 31 , 2011 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) balance , december 31 , 2008................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2009................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2010................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2011................................................................................................................................... . $ 846258 103698 ( 11869 ) 938087 108261 ( 11144 ) 1035204 114180 ( 21796 ) $ 1127588 .
Question: what was the value in 2009?
Answer: 108261.0
Question: what was the value in 2008?
Answer: 103698.0
Question: what is the ratio of 2009 to 2008?
Answer: 1.044
Question: what is that value less 1?
| 0.044 |
CONVFINQA4432 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
10-k altria ar release tuesday , february 27 , 2018 10:00pm andra design llc performance stock units : in january 2017 , altria group , inc . granted an aggregate of 187886 performance stock units to eligible employees . the payout of the performance stock units requires the achievement of certain performance measures , which were predetermined at the time of grant , over a three-year performance cycle . these performance measures consist of altria group , inc . 2019s adjusted diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) compounded annual growth rate and altria group , inc . 2019s total shareholder return relative to a predetermined peer group . the performance stock units are also subject to forfeiture if certain employment conditions are not met . at december 31 , 2017 , altria group , inc . had 170755 performance stock units remaining , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 70.39 per performance stock unit . the fair value of the performance stock units at the date of grant , net of estimated forfeitures , is amortized to expense over the performance period . altria group , inc . recorded pre-tax compensation expense related to performance stock units for the year ended december 31 , 2017 of $ 6 million . the unamortized compensation expense related to altria group , inc . 2019s performance stock units was $ 7 million at december 31 , 2017 . altria group , inc . did not grant any performance stock units during 2016 and 2015 . note 12 . earnings per share basic and diluted eps were calculated using the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings attributable to altria group inc .</td><td>$ 10222</td><td>$ 14239</td><td>$ 5241</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based awards</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>earnings for basic and diluted eps</td><td>$ 10208</td><td>$ 14215</td><td>$ 5231</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps</td><td>1921</td><td>1952</td><td>1961</td></tr></table> net earnings attributable to altria group , inc . $ 10222 $ 14239 $ 5241 less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based awards ( 14 ) ( 24 ) ( 10 ) earnings for basic and diluted eps $ 10208 $ 14215 $ 5231 weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps 1921 1952 1961 .
Question: what is the difference in net earnings attributable to altria group inc between 2016 and 2017?
| 4017.0 |
CONVFINQA4433 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
10-k altria ar release tuesday , february 27 , 2018 10:00pm andra design llc performance stock units : in january 2017 , altria group , inc . granted an aggregate of 187886 performance stock units to eligible employees . the payout of the performance stock units requires the achievement of certain performance measures , which were predetermined at the time of grant , over a three-year performance cycle . these performance measures consist of altria group , inc . 2019s adjusted diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) compounded annual growth rate and altria group , inc . 2019s total shareholder return relative to a predetermined peer group . the performance stock units are also subject to forfeiture if certain employment conditions are not met . at december 31 , 2017 , altria group , inc . had 170755 performance stock units remaining , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 70.39 per performance stock unit . the fair value of the performance stock units at the date of grant , net of estimated forfeitures , is amortized to expense over the performance period . altria group , inc . recorded pre-tax compensation expense related to performance stock units for the year ended december 31 , 2017 of $ 6 million . the unamortized compensation expense related to altria group , inc . 2019s performance stock units was $ 7 million at december 31 , 2017 . altria group , inc . did not grant any performance stock units during 2016 and 2015 . note 12 . earnings per share basic and diluted eps were calculated using the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings attributable to altria group inc .</td><td>$ 10222</td><td>$ 14239</td><td>$ 5241</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based awards</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>earnings for basic and diluted eps</td><td>$ 10208</td><td>$ 14215</td><td>$ 5231</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps</td><td>1921</td><td>1952</td><td>1961</td></tr></table> net earnings attributable to altria group , inc . $ 10222 $ 14239 $ 5241 less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based awards ( 14 ) ( 24 ) ( 10 ) earnings for basic and diluted eps $ 10208 $ 14215 $ 5231 weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps 1921 1952 1961 .
Question: what is the difference in net earnings attributable to altria group inc between 2016 and 2017?
Answer: 4017.0
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
| 0.39298 |
CONVFINQA4434 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) we review our goodwill for impairment annually , or more frequently , if facts and circumstances warrant a review . we completed our annual impairment test in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 . we elected to use the step 1 quantitative assessment for our three reporting units 2014digital media , digital marketing and print and publishing 2014and determined that there was no impairment of goodwill . there is no significant risk of material goodwill impairment in any of our reporting units , based upon the results of our annual goodwill impairment test . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2013 , 2012 or 2011 . our intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 1 to 14 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed or on a straight-line basis when the consumption pattern is not apparent . the weighted average useful lives of our intangible assets were as follows : weighted average useful life ( years ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>weighted averageuseful life ( years )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>purchased technology</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>customer contracts and relationships</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trademarks</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>acquired rights to use technology</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>localization</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangibles</td><td>3</td></tr></table> software development costs capitalization of software development costs for software to be sold , leased , or otherwise marketed begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility , which is generally the completion of a working prototype that has been certified as having no critical bugs and is a release candidate . amortization begins once the software is ready for its intended use , generally based on the pattern in which the economic benefits will be consumed . to date , software development costs incurred between completion of a working prototype and general availability of the related product have not been material . internal use software we capitalize costs associated with customized internal-use software systems that have reached the application development stage . such capitalized costs include external direct costs utilized in developing or obtaining the applications and payroll and payroll-related expenses for employees , who are directly associated with the development of the applications . capitalization of such costs begins when the preliminary project stage is complete and ceases at the point in which the project is substantially complete and is ready for its intended purpose . income taxes we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes . under this method , income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year . in addition , deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards . we record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not. .
Question: what is the sum value of trademarks and acquired right to use technology?
| 16.0 |
CONVFINQA4435 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) we review our goodwill for impairment annually , or more frequently , if facts and circumstances warrant a review . we completed our annual impairment test in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 . we elected to use the step 1 quantitative assessment for our three reporting units 2014digital media , digital marketing and print and publishing 2014and determined that there was no impairment of goodwill . there is no significant risk of material goodwill impairment in any of our reporting units , based upon the results of our annual goodwill impairment test . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2013 , 2012 or 2011 . our intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 1 to 14 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed or on a straight-line basis when the consumption pattern is not apparent . the weighted average useful lives of our intangible assets were as follows : weighted average useful life ( years ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>weighted averageuseful life ( years )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>purchased technology</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>customer contracts and relationships</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trademarks</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>acquired rights to use technology</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>localization</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangibles</td><td>3</td></tr></table> software development costs capitalization of software development costs for software to be sold , leased , or otherwise marketed begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility , which is generally the completion of a working prototype that has been certified as having no critical bugs and is a release candidate . amortization begins once the software is ready for its intended use , generally based on the pattern in which the economic benefits will be consumed . to date , software development costs incurred between completion of a working prototype and general availability of the related product have not been material . internal use software we capitalize costs associated with customized internal-use software systems that have reached the application development stage . such capitalized costs include external direct costs utilized in developing or obtaining the applications and payroll and payroll-related expenses for employees , who are directly associated with the development of the applications . capitalization of such costs begins when the preliminary project stage is complete and ceases at the point in which the project is substantially complete and is ready for its intended purpose . income taxes we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes . under this method , income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year . in addition , deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards . we record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not. .
Question: what is the sum value of trademarks and acquired right to use technology?
Answer: 16.0
Question: what is the average value?
| 8.0 |
CONVFINQA4436 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) t . other commitments and contingencies litigation . we are subject to claims , charges , litigation and other proceedings in the ordinary course of our business , including those arising from or related to contractual matters , intellectual property , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , construction defect , insurance coverage , personnel and employment disputes and other matters , including class actions . we believe we have adequate defenses in these matters and that the outcome of these matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on us . however , there is no assurance that we will prevail in these matters , and we could in the future incur judgments , enter into settlements of claims or revise our expectations regarding the outcome of these matters , which could materially impact our results of operations . in july 2012 , the company reached a settlement agreement related to the columbus drywall litigation . the company and its insulation installation companies named in the suit agreed to pay $ 75 million in return for dismissal with prejudice and full release of all claims . the company and its insulation installation companies continue to deny that the challenged conduct was unlawful and admit no wrongdoing as part of the settlement . a settlement was reached to eliminate the considerable expense and uncertainty of this lawsuit . the company recorded the settlement expense in the second quarter of 2012 and the amount was paid in the fourth quarter of 2012 . warranty . at the time of sale , the company accrues a warranty liability for the estimated cost to provide products , parts or services to repair or replace products in satisfaction of warranty obligations . during the third quarter of 2012 , a business in the other specialty products segment recorded a $ 12 million increase in expected future warranty claims resulting from the completion of an analysis prepared by the company based upon its periodic assessment of recent business unit specific operating trends including , among others , home ownership demographics , sales volumes , manufacturing quality , an analysis of recent warranty claim activity and an estimate of current costs to service anticipated claims . changes in the company 2019s warranty liability were as follows , in millions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 107</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accruals for warranties issued during the year</td><td>42</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accruals related to pre-existing warranties</td><td>16</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements made ( in cash or kind ) during the year</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other net ( including currency translation )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 102</td></tr></table> investments . with respect to the company 2019s investments in private equity funds , the company had , at december 31 , 2012 , commitments to contribute up to $ 19 million of additional capital to such funds representing the company 2019s aggregate capital commitment to such funds less capital contributions made to date . the company is contractually obligated to make additional capital contributions to certain of its private equity funds upon receipt of a capital call from the private equity fund . the company has no control over when or if the capital calls will occur . capital calls are funded in cash and generally result in an increase in the carrying value of the company 2019s investment in the private equity fund when paid. .
Question: what was the value of accruals for warranties issued during the year 2012?
| 42.0 |
CONVFINQA4437 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) t . other commitments and contingencies litigation . we are subject to claims , charges , litigation and other proceedings in the ordinary course of our business , including those arising from or related to contractual matters , intellectual property , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , construction defect , insurance coverage , personnel and employment disputes and other matters , including class actions . we believe we have adequate defenses in these matters and that the outcome of these matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on us . however , there is no assurance that we will prevail in these matters , and we could in the future incur judgments , enter into settlements of claims or revise our expectations regarding the outcome of these matters , which could materially impact our results of operations . in july 2012 , the company reached a settlement agreement related to the columbus drywall litigation . the company and its insulation installation companies named in the suit agreed to pay $ 75 million in return for dismissal with prejudice and full release of all claims . the company and its insulation installation companies continue to deny that the challenged conduct was unlawful and admit no wrongdoing as part of the settlement . a settlement was reached to eliminate the considerable expense and uncertainty of this lawsuit . the company recorded the settlement expense in the second quarter of 2012 and the amount was paid in the fourth quarter of 2012 . warranty . at the time of sale , the company accrues a warranty liability for the estimated cost to provide products , parts or services to repair or replace products in satisfaction of warranty obligations . during the third quarter of 2012 , a business in the other specialty products segment recorded a $ 12 million increase in expected future warranty claims resulting from the completion of an analysis prepared by the company based upon its periodic assessment of recent business unit specific operating trends including , among others , home ownership demographics , sales volumes , manufacturing quality , an analysis of recent warranty claim activity and an estimate of current costs to service anticipated claims . changes in the company 2019s warranty liability were as follows , in millions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 107</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accruals for warranties issued during the year</td><td>42</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accruals related to pre-existing warranties</td><td>16</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements made ( in cash or kind ) during the year</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other net ( including currency translation )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 102</td></tr></table> investments . with respect to the company 2019s investments in private equity funds , the company had , at december 31 , 2012 , commitments to contribute up to $ 19 million of additional capital to such funds representing the company 2019s aggregate capital commitment to such funds less capital contributions made to date . the company is contractually obligated to make additional capital contributions to certain of its private equity funds upon receipt of a capital call from the private equity fund . the company has no control over when or if the capital calls will occur . capital calls are funded in cash and generally result in an increase in the carrying value of the company 2019s investment in the private equity fund when paid. .
Question: what was the value of accruals for warranties issued during the year 2012?
Answer: 42.0
Question: what was the value of accruals for warranties issued during the year 2011?
| 28.0 |
CONVFINQA4438 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) t . other commitments and contingencies litigation . we are subject to claims , charges , litigation and other proceedings in the ordinary course of our business , including those arising from or related to contractual matters , intellectual property , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , construction defect , insurance coverage , personnel and employment disputes and other matters , including class actions . we believe we have adequate defenses in these matters and that the outcome of these matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on us . however , there is no assurance that we will prevail in these matters , and we could in the future incur judgments , enter into settlements of claims or revise our expectations regarding the outcome of these matters , which could materially impact our results of operations . in july 2012 , the company reached a settlement agreement related to the columbus drywall litigation . the company and its insulation installation companies named in the suit agreed to pay $ 75 million in return for dismissal with prejudice and full release of all claims . the company and its insulation installation companies continue to deny that the challenged conduct was unlawful and admit no wrongdoing as part of the settlement . a settlement was reached to eliminate the considerable expense and uncertainty of this lawsuit . the company recorded the settlement expense in the second quarter of 2012 and the amount was paid in the fourth quarter of 2012 . warranty . at the time of sale , the company accrues a warranty liability for the estimated cost to provide products , parts or services to repair or replace products in satisfaction of warranty obligations . during the third quarter of 2012 , a business in the other specialty products segment recorded a $ 12 million increase in expected future warranty claims resulting from the completion of an analysis prepared by the company based upon its periodic assessment of recent business unit specific operating trends including , among others , home ownership demographics , sales volumes , manufacturing quality , an analysis of recent warranty claim activity and an estimate of current costs to service anticipated claims . changes in the company 2019s warranty liability were as follows , in millions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 107</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accruals for warranties issued during the year</td><td>42</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accruals related to pre-existing warranties</td><td>16</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements made ( in cash or kind ) during the year</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other net ( including currency translation )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 102</td></tr></table> investments . with respect to the company 2019s investments in private equity funds , the company had , at december 31 , 2012 , commitments to contribute up to $ 19 million of additional capital to such funds representing the company 2019s aggregate capital commitment to such funds less capital contributions made to date . the company is contractually obligated to make additional capital contributions to certain of its private equity funds upon receipt of a capital call from the private equity fund . the company has no control over when or if the capital calls will occur . capital calls are funded in cash and generally result in an increase in the carrying value of the company 2019s investment in the private equity fund when paid. .
Question: what was the value of accruals for warranties issued during the year 2012?
Answer: 42.0
Question: what was the value of accruals for warranties issued during the year 2011?
Answer: 28.0
Question: what was the net value change?
| 14.0 |
CONVFINQA4439 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) t . other commitments and contingencies litigation . we are subject to claims , charges , litigation and other proceedings in the ordinary course of our business , including those arising from or related to contractual matters , intellectual property , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , construction defect , insurance coverage , personnel and employment disputes and other matters , including class actions . we believe we have adequate defenses in these matters and that the outcome of these matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on us . however , there is no assurance that we will prevail in these matters , and we could in the future incur judgments , enter into settlements of claims or revise our expectations regarding the outcome of these matters , which could materially impact our results of operations . in july 2012 , the company reached a settlement agreement related to the columbus drywall litigation . the company and its insulation installation companies named in the suit agreed to pay $ 75 million in return for dismissal with prejudice and full release of all claims . the company and its insulation installation companies continue to deny that the challenged conduct was unlawful and admit no wrongdoing as part of the settlement . a settlement was reached to eliminate the considerable expense and uncertainty of this lawsuit . the company recorded the settlement expense in the second quarter of 2012 and the amount was paid in the fourth quarter of 2012 . warranty . at the time of sale , the company accrues a warranty liability for the estimated cost to provide products , parts or services to repair or replace products in satisfaction of warranty obligations . during the third quarter of 2012 , a business in the other specialty products segment recorded a $ 12 million increase in expected future warranty claims resulting from the completion of an analysis prepared by the company based upon its periodic assessment of recent business unit specific operating trends including , among others , home ownership demographics , sales volumes , manufacturing quality , an analysis of recent warranty claim activity and an estimate of current costs to service anticipated claims . changes in the company 2019s warranty liability were as follows , in millions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 107</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accruals for warranties issued during the year</td><td>42</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accruals related to pre-existing warranties</td><td>16</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements made ( in cash or kind ) during the year</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other net ( including currency translation )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 102</td></tr></table> investments . with respect to the company 2019s investments in private equity funds , the company had , at december 31 , 2012 , commitments to contribute up to $ 19 million of additional capital to such funds representing the company 2019s aggregate capital commitment to such funds less capital contributions made to date . the company is contractually obligated to make additional capital contributions to certain of its private equity funds upon receipt of a capital call from the private equity fund . the company has no control over when or if the capital calls will occur . capital calls are funded in cash and generally result in an increase in the carrying value of the company 2019s investment in the private equity fund when paid. .
Question: what was the value of accruals for warranties issued during the year 2012?
Answer: 42.0
Question: what was the value of accruals for warranties issued during the year 2011?
Answer: 28.0
Question: what was the net value change?
Answer: 14.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.5 |
CONVFINQA4440 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 3 . acquisitions ( continued ) including the revenues of third-party licensees , or ( ii ) the company 2019s sale of ( a ) ecp , ( b ) all or substantially all of ecp 2019s assets , or ( c ) certain of ecp 2019s patent rights , the company will pay to syscore the lesser of ( x ) one-half of the profits earned from such sale described in the foregoing item ( ii ) , after accounting for the costs of acquiring and operating ecp , or ( y ) $ 15.0 million ( less any previous milestone payment ) . ecp 2019s acquisition of ais gmbh aachen innovative solutions in connection with the company 2019s acquisition of ecp , ecp acquired all of the share capital of ais gmbh aachen innovative solutions ( 201cais 201d ) , a limited liability company incorporated in germany , pursuant to a share purchase agreement dated as of june 30 , 2014 , by and among ecp and ais 2019s four individual shareholders . ais , based in aachen , germany , holds certain intellectual property useful to ecp 2019s business , and , prior to being acquired by ecp , had licensed such intellectual property to ecp . the purchase price for the acquisition of ais 2019s share capital was approximately $ 2.8 million in cash , which was provided by the company , and the acquisition closed immediately prior to abiomed europe 2019s acquisition of ecp . the share purchase agreement contains representations , warranties and closing conditions customary for transactions of its size and nature . purchase price allocation the acquisition of ecp and ais was accounted for as a business combination . the purchase price for the acquisition has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values . the acquisition-date fair value of the consideration transferred is as follows : acquisition date fair value ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total acquisition date fair value ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash consideration</td><td>$ 15750</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contingent consideration</td><td>6000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total consideration transferred</td><td>$ 21750</td></tr></table> .
Question: of the ecp and ais transactions, what percentage of the total consideration was paid immediately in cash?
| 0.72414 |
CONVFINQA4441 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 3 . acquisitions ( continued ) including the revenues of third-party licensees , or ( ii ) the company 2019s sale of ( a ) ecp , ( b ) all or substantially all of ecp 2019s assets , or ( c ) certain of ecp 2019s patent rights , the company will pay to syscore the lesser of ( x ) one-half of the profits earned from such sale described in the foregoing item ( ii ) , after accounting for the costs of acquiring and operating ecp , or ( y ) $ 15.0 million ( less any previous milestone payment ) . ecp 2019s acquisition of ais gmbh aachen innovative solutions in connection with the company 2019s acquisition of ecp , ecp acquired all of the share capital of ais gmbh aachen innovative solutions ( 201cais 201d ) , a limited liability company incorporated in germany , pursuant to a share purchase agreement dated as of june 30 , 2014 , by and among ecp and ais 2019s four individual shareholders . ais , based in aachen , germany , holds certain intellectual property useful to ecp 2019s business , and , prior to being acquired by ecp , had licensed such intellectual property to ecp . the purchase price for the acquisition of ais 2019s share capital was approximately $ 2.8 million in cash , which was provided by the company , and the acquisition closed immediately prior to abiomed europe 2019s acquisition of ecp . the share purchase agreement contains representations , warranties and closing conditions customary for transactions of its size and nature . purchase price allocation the acquisition of ecp and ais was accounted for as a business combination . the purchase price for the acquisition has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values . the acquisition-date fair value of the consideration transferred is as follows : acquisition date fair value ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total acquisition date fair value ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash consideration</td><td>$ 15750</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contingent consideration</td><td>6000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total consideration transferred</td><td>$ 21750</td></tr></table> .
Question: of the ecp and ais transactions, what percentage of the total consideration was paid immediately in cash?
Answer: 0.72414
Question: and what percentage of the total consideration amount for the ecp and ais acquisition was a contingent consideration?
| 0.27586 |
CONVFINQA4442 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
underlying physical transaction occurs . we have not qualified commodity derivative instruments used in our osm or rm&t segments for hedge accounting . as a result , we recognize in net income all changes in the fair value of derivative instruments used in those operations . open commodity derivative positions as of december 31 , 2008 and sensitivity analysis at december 31 , 2008 , our e&p segment held open derivative contracts to mitigate the price risk on natural gas held in storage or purchased to be marketed with our own natural gas production in amounts that were in line with normal levels of activity . at december 31 , 2008 , we had no significant open derivative contracts related to our future sales of liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas and therefore remained substantially exposed to market prices of these commodities . the osm segment holds crude oil options which were purchased by western for a three year period ( january 2007 to december 2009 ) . the premiums for the purchased put options had been partially offset through the sale of call options for the same three-year period , resulting in a net premium liability . payment of the net premium liability is deferred until the settlement of the option contracts . as of december 31 , 2008 , the following put and call options were outstanding: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>option expiration date</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>option contract volumes ( barrels per day ) :</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>put options purchased</td><td>20000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>call options sold</td><td>15000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average exercise price ( dollars per barrel ) :</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>put options</td><td>$ 50.50</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>call options</td><td>$ 90.50</td></tr></table> in the first quarter of 2009 , we sold derivative instruments at an average exercise price of $ 50.50 which effectively offset the open put options for the remainder of 2009 . at december 31 , 2008 , the number of open derivative contracts held by our rm&t segment was lower than in previous periods . starting in the second quarter of 2008 , we decreased our use of derivatives to mitigate crude oil price risk between the time that domestic spot crude oil purchases are priced and when they are actually refined into salable petroleum products . instead , we are addressing this price risk through other means , including changes in contractual terms and crude oil acquisition practices . additionally , in previous periods , certain contracts in our rm&t segment for the purchase or sale of commodities were not qualified or designated as normal purchase or normal sales under generally accepted accounting principles and therefore were accounted for as derivative instruments . during the second quarter of 2008 , as we decreased our use of derivatives , we began to designate such contracts for the normal purchase and normal sale exclusion. .
Question: based on the average exercise price displayed on the list, what was the full value of the put options purchased?
| 1010000.0 |
CONVFINQA4443 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
underlying physical transaction occurs . we have not qualified commodity derivative instruments used in our osm or rm&t segments for hedge accounting . as a result , we recognize in net income all changes in the fair value of derivative instruments used in those operations . open commodity derivative positions as of december 31 , 2008 and sensitivity analysis at december 31 , 2008 , our e&p segment held open derivative contracts to mitigate the price risk on natural gas held in storage or purchased to be marketed with our own natural gas production in amounts that were in line with normal levels of activity . at december 31 , 2008 , we had no significant open derivative contracts related to our future sales of liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas and therefore remained substantially exposed to market prices of these commodities . the osm segment holds crude oil options which were purchased by western for a three year period ( january 2007 to december 2009 ) . the premiums for the purchased put options had been partially offset through the sale of call options for the same three-year period , resulting in a net premium liability . payment of the net premium liability is deferred until the settlement of the option contracts . as of december 31 , 2008 , the following put and call options were outstanding: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>option expiration date</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>option contract volumes ( barrels per day ) :</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>put options purchased</td><td>20000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>call options sold</td><td>15000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average exercise price ( dollars per barrel ) :</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>put options</td><td>$ 50.50</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>call options</td><td>$ 90.50</td></tr></table> in the first quarter of 2009 , we sold derivative instruments at an average exercise price of $ 50.50 which effectively offset the open put options for the remainder of 2009 . at december 31 , 2008 , the number of open derivative contracts held by our rm&t segment was lower than in previous periods . starting in the second quarter of 2008 , we decreased our use of derivatives to mitigate crude oil price risk between the time that domestic spot crude oil purchases are priced and when they are actually refined into salable petroleum products . instead , we are addressing this price risk through other means , including changes in contractual terms and crude oil acquisition practices . additionally , in previous periods , certain contracts in our rm&t segment for the purchase or sale of commodities were not qualified or designated as normal purchase or normal sales under generally accepted accounting principles and therefore were accounted for as derivative instruments . during the second quarter of 2008 , as we decreased our use of derivatives , we began to designate such contracts for the normal purchase and normal sale exclusion. .
Question: based on the average exercise price displayed on the list, what was the full value of the put options purchased?
Answer: 1010000.0
Question: and considering that same list, what were the average option contract volumes between those put options purchased and the call options sold, in barrels per day?
| 20000.0 |
CONVFINQA4444 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
underlying physical transaction occurs . we have not qualified commodity derivative instruments used in our osm or rm&t segments for hedge accounting . as a result , we recognize in net income all changes in the fair value of derivative instruments used in those operations . open commodity derivative positions as of december 31 , 2008 and sensitivity analysis at december 31 , 2008 , our e&p segment held open derivative contracts to mitigate the price risk on natural gas held in storage or purchased to be marketed with our own natural gas production in amounts that were in line with normal levels of activity . at december 31 , 2008 , we had no significant open derivative contracts related to our future sales of liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas and therefore remained substantially exposed to market prices of these commodities . the osm segment holds crude oil options which were purchased by western for a three year period ( january 2007 to december 2009 ) . the premiums for the purchased put options had been partially offset through the sale of call options for the same three-year period , resulting in a net premium liability . payment of the net premium liability is deferred until the settlement of the option contracts . as of december 31 , 2008 , the following put and call options were outstanding: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>option expiration date</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>option contract volumes ( barrels per day ) :</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>put options purchased</td><td>20000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>call options sold</td><td>15000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average exercise price ( dollars per barrel ) :</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>put options</td><td>$ 50.50</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>call options</td><td>$ 90.50</td></tr></table> in the first quarter of 2009 , we sold derivative instruments at an average exercise price of $ 50.50 which effectively offset the open put options for the remainder of 2009 . at december 31 , 2008 , the number of open derivative contracts held by our rm&t segment was lower than in previous periods . starting in the second quarter of 2008 , we decreased our use of derivatives to mitigate crude oil price risk between the time that domestic spot crude oil purchases are priced and when they are actually refined into salable petroleum products . instead , we are addressing this price risk through other means , including changes in contractual terms and crude oil acquisition practices . additionally , in previous periods , certain contracts in our rm&t segment for the purchase or sale of commodities were not qualified or designated as normal purchase or normal sales under generally accepted accounting principles and therefore were accounted for as derivative instruments . during the second quarter of 2008 , as we decreased our use of derivatives , we began to designate such contracts for the normal purchase and normal sale exclusion. .
Question: based on the average exercise price displayed on the list, what was the full value of the put options purchased?
Answer: 1010000.0
Question: and considering that same list, what were the average option contract volumes between those put options purchased and the call options sold, in barrels per day?
Answer: 20000.0
Question: and considering that same list, what were the average option contract volumes between those put options purchased and the call options sold, in barrels per day?
| 17500.0 |
CONVFINQA4445 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements minority partner approves the annual budget , receives a detailed monthly reporting package from us , meets with us on a quarterly basis to review the results of the joint venture , reviews and approves the joint venture 2019s tax return before filing , and approves all leases that cover more than a nominal amount of space relative to the total rentable space at each property we do not consolidate the joint venture as we consider these to be substantive participation rights . our joint venture agreements also contain certain pro- tective rights such as the requirement of partner approval to sell , finance or refinance the property and the payment of capital expenditures and operating expenditures outside of the approved budget or operating plan . the table below provides general information on each joint venture as of december 31 , 2009 ( in thousands ) : property partner ownership interest economic interest square feet acquired acquisition price ( 1 ) 1221 avenue of the americas ( 2 ) rgii 45.00% ( 45.00 % ) 45.00% ( 45.00 % ) 2550 12/03 $ 1000000 1515 broadway ( 3 ) sitq 55.00% ( 55.00 % ) 68.45% ( 68.45 % ) 1750 05/02 $ 483500 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>property</td><td>partner</td><td>ownership interest</td><td>economic interest</td><td>square feet</td><td>acquired</td><td>acquisition price ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>1221 avenue of the americas ( 2 )</td><td>rgii</td><td>45.00% ( 45.00 % )</td><td>45.00% ( 45.00 % )</td><td>2550</td><td>12/03</td><td>$ 1000000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1515 broadway ( 3 )</td><td>sitq</td><td>55.00% ( 55.00 % )</td><td>68.45% ( 68.45 % )</td><td>1750</td><td>05/02</td><td>$ 483500</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>100 park avenue</td><td>prudential</td><td>49.90% ( 49.90 % )</td><td>49.90% ( 49.90 % )</td><td>834</td><td>02/00</td><td>$ 95800</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>379 west broadway</td><td>sutton</td><td>45.00% ( 45.00 % )</td><td>45.00% ( 45.00 % )</td><td>62</td><td>12/05</td><td>$ 19750</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>21 west 34thstreet ( 4 )</td><td>sutton</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>30</td><td>07/05</td><td>$ 22400</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>800 third avenue ( 5 )</td><td>private investors</td><td>42.95% ( 42.95 % )</td><td>42.95% ( 42.95 % )</td><td>526</td><td>12/06</td><td>$ 285000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>521 fifth avenue</td><td>cif</td><td>50.10% ( 50.10 % )</td><td>50.10% ( 50.10 % )</td><td>460</td><td>12/06</td><td>$ 240000</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>one court square</td><td>jp morgan</td><td>30.00% ( 30.00 % )</td><td>30.00% ( 30.00 % )</td><td>1402</td><td>01/07</td><td>$ 533500</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>1604-1610 broadway ( 6 )</td><td>onyx/sutton</td><td>45.00% ( 45.00 % )</td><td>63.00% ( 63.00 % )</td><td>30</td><td>11/05</td><td>$ 4400</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>1745 broadway ( 7 )</td><td>witkoff/sitq/lehman bros .</td><td>32.26% ( 32.26 % )</td><td>32.26% ( 32.26 % )</td><td>674</td><td>04/07</td><td>$ 520000</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>1 and 2 jericho plaza</td><td>onyx/credit suisse</td><td>20.26% ( 20.26 % )</td><td>20.26% ( 20.26 % )</td><td>640</td><td>04/07</td><td>$ 210000</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>2 herald square ( 8 )</td><td>gramercy</td><td>55.00% ( 55.00 % )</td><td>55.00% ( 55.00 % )</td><td>354</td><td>04/07</td><td>$ 225000</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>885 third avenue ( 9 )</td><td>gramercy</td><td>55.00% ( 55.00 % )</td><td>55.00% ( 55.00 % )</td><td>607</td><td>07/07</td><td>$ 317000</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>16 court street</td><td>cif</td><td>35.00% ( 35.00 % )</td><td>35.00% ( 35.00 % )</td><td>318</td><td>07/07</td><td>$ 107500</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>the meadows ( 10 )</td><td>onyx</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>582</td><td>09/07</td><td>$ 111500</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>388 and 390 greenwich street ( 11 )</td><td>sitq</td><td>50.60% ( 50.60 % )</td><td>50.60% ( 50.60 % )</td><td>2600</td><td>12/07</td><td>$ 1575000</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>27-29 west 34thstreet ( 12 )</td><td>sutton</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>41</td><td>01/06</td><td>$ 30000</td></tr><tr><td>19</td><td>1551-1555 broadway ( 13 )</td><td>sutton</td><td>10.00% ( 10.00 % )</td><td>10.00% ( 10.00 % )</td><td>26</td><td>07/05</td><td>$ 80100</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>717 fifth avenue ( 14 )</td><td>sutton/nakash</td><td>32.75% ( 32.75 % )</td><td>32.75% ( 32.75 % )</td><td>120</td><td>09/06</td><td>$ 251900</td></tr></table> the meadows ( 10 ) onyx 50.00% ( 50.00 % ) 50.00% ( 50.00 % ) 582 09/07 $ 111500 388 and 390 greenwich street ( 11 ) sitq 50.60% ( 50.60 % ) 50.60% ( 50.60 % ) 2600 12/07 $ 1575000 27 201329 west 34th street ( 12 ) sutton 50.00% ( 50.00 % ) 50.00% ( 50.00 % ) 41 01/06 $ 30000 1551 20131555 broadway ( 13 ) sutton 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) 26 07/05 $ 80100 717 fifth avenue ( 14 ) sutton/nakash 32.75% ( 32.75 % ) 32.75% ( 32.75 % ) 120 09/06 $ 251900 ( 1 ) acquisition price represents the actual or implied purchase price for the joint venture . ( 2 ) we acquired our interest from the mcgraw-hill companies , or mhc . mhc is a tenant at the property and accounted for approximately 14.7% ( 14.7 % ) of the property 2019s annualized rent at december 31 , 2009 . we do not manage this joint venture . ( 3 ) under a tax protection agreement established to protect the limited partners of the partnership that transferred 1515 broadway to the joint venture , the joint venture has agreed not to adversely affect the limited partners 2019 tax positions before december 2011 . one tenant , whose leases primarily ends in 2015 , represents approximately 77.4% ( 77.4 % ) of this joint venture 2019s annualized rent at december 31 , 2009 . ( 4 ) effective november 2006 , we deconsolidated this investment . as a result of the recapitalization of the property , we were no longer the primary beneficiary . both partners had the same amount of equity at risk and neither partner controlled the joint venture . ( 5 ) we invested approximately $ 109.5 million in this asset through the origination of a loan secured by up to 47% ( 47 % ) of the interests in the property 2019s ownership , with an option to convert the loan to an equity interest . certain existing members have the right to re-acquire approximately 4% ( 4 % ) of the property 2019s equity . these interests were re-acquired in december 2008 and reduced our interest to 42.95% ( 42.95 % ) ( 6 ) effective april 2007 , we deconsolidated this investment . as a result of the recapitalization of the property , we were no longer the primary beneficiary . both partners had the same amount of equity at risk and neither partner controlled the joint venture . ( 7 ) we have the ability to syndicate our interest down to 14.79% ( 14.79 % ) . ( 8 ) we , along with gramercy , together as tenants-in-common , acquired a fee interest in 2 herald square . the fee interest is subject to a long-term operating lease . ( 9 ) we , along with gramercy , together as tenants-in-common , acquired a fee and leasehold interest in 885 third avenue . the fee and leasehold interests are subject to a long-term operating lease . ( 10 ) we , along with onyx acquired the remaining 50% ( 50 % ) interest on a pro-rata basis in september 2009 . ( 11 ) the property is subject to a 13-year triple-net lease arrangement with a single tenant . ( 12 ) effective may 2008 , we deconsolidated this investment . as a result of the recapitalization of the property , we were no longer the primary beneficiary . both partners had the same amount of equity at risk and neither partner controlled the joint venture . ( 13 ) effective august 2008 , we deconsolidated this investment . as a result of the sale of 80% ( 80 % ) of our interest , the joint venture was no longer a vie . ( 14 ) effective september 2008 , we deconsolidated this investment . as a result of the recapitalization of the property , we were no longer the primary beneficiary. .
Question: what is the acquisition price times 1000 for 1745 broadway?
| 520000000.0 |
CONVFINQA4446 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements minority partner approves the annual budget , receives a detailed monthly reporting package from us , meets with us on a quarterly basis to review the results of the joint venture , reviews and approves the joint venture 2019s tax return before filing , and approves all leases that cover more than a nominal amount of space relative to the total rentable space at each property we do not consolidate the joint venture as we consider these to be substantive participation rights . our joint venture agreements also contain certain pro- tective rights such as the requirement of partner approval to sell , finance or refinance the property and the payment of capital expenditures and operating expenditures outside of the approved budget or operating plan . the table below provides general information on each joint venture as of december 31 , 2009 ( in thousands ) : property partner ownership interest economic interest square feet acquired acquisition price ( 1 ) 1221 avenue of the americas ( 2 ) rgii 45.00% ( 45.00 % ) 45.00% ( 45.00 % ) 2550 12/03 $ 1000000 1515 broadway ( 3 ) sitq 55.00% ( 55.00 % ) 68.45% ( 68.45 % ) 1750 05/02 $ 483500 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>property</td><td>partner</td><td>ownership interest</td><td>economic interest</td><td>square feet</td><td>acquired</td><td>acquisition price ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>1221 avenue of the americas ( 2 )</td><td>rgii</td><td>45.00% ( 45.00 % )</td><td>45.00% ( 45.00 % )</td><td>2550</td><td>12/03</td><td>$ 1000000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1515 broadway ( 3 )</td><td>sitq</td><td>55.00% ( 55.00 % )</td><td>68.45% ( 68.45 % )</td><td>1750</td><td>05/02</td><td>$ 483500</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>100 park avenue</td><td>prudential</td><td>49.90% ( 49.90 % )</td><td>49.90% ( 49.90 % )</td><td>834</td><td>02/00</td><td>$ 95800</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>379 west broadway</td><td>sutton</td><td>45.00% ( 45.00 % )</td><td>45.00% ( 45.00 % )</td><td>62</td><td>12/05</td><td>$ 19750</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>21 west 34thstreet ( 4 )</td><td>sutton</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>30</td><td>07/05</td><td>$ 22400</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>800 third avenue ( 5 )</td><td>private investors</td><td>42.95% ( 42.95 % )</td><td>42.95% ( 42.95 % )</td><td>526</td><td>12/06</td><td>$ 285000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>521 fifth avenue</td><td>cif</td><td>50.10% ( 50.10 % )</td><td>50.10% ( 50.10 % )</td><td>460</td><td>12/06</td><td>$ 240000</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>one court square</td><td>jp morgan</td><td>30.00% ( 30.00 % )</td><td>30.00% ( 30.00 % )</td><td>1402</td><td>01/07</td><td>$ 533500</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>1604-1610 broadway ( 6 )</td><td>onyx/sutton</td><td>45.00% ( 45.00 % )</td><td>63.00% ( 63.00 % )</td><td>30</td><td>11/05</td><td>$ 4400</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>1745 broadway ( 7 )</td><td>witkoff/sitq/lehman bros .</td><td>32.26% ( 32.26 % )</td><td>32.26% ( 32.26 % )</td><td>674</td><td>04/07</td><td>$ 520000</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>1 and 2 jericho plaza</td><td>onyx/credit suisse</td><td>20.26% ( 20.26 % )</td><td>20.26% ( 20.26 % )</td><td>640</td><td>04/07</td><td>$ 210000</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>2 herald square ( 8 )</td><td>gramercy</td><td>55.00% ( 55.00 % )</td><td>55.00% ( 55.00 % )</td><td>354</td><td>04/07</td><td>$ 225000</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>885 third avenue ( 9 )</td><td>gramercy</td><td>55.00% ( 55.00 % )</td><td>55.00% ( 55.00 % )</td><td>607</td><td>07/07</td><td>$ 317000</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>16 court street</td><td>cif</td><td>35.00% ( 35.00 % )</td><td>35.00% ( 35.00 % )</td><td>318</td><td>07/07</td><td>$ 107500</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>the meadows ( 10 )</td><td>onyx</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>582</td><td>09/07</td><td>$ 111500</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>388 and 390 greenwich street ( 11 )</td><td>sitq</td><td>50.60% ( 50.60 % )</td><td>50.60% ( 50.60 % )</td><td>2600</td><td>12/07</td><td>$ 1575000</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>27-29 west 34thstreet ( 12 )</td><td>sutton</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>50.00% ( 50.00 % )</td><td>41</td><td>01/06</td><td>$ 30000</td></tr><tr><td>19</td><td>1551-1555 broadway ( 13 )</td><td>sutton</td><td>10.00% ( 10.00 % )</td><td>10.00% ( 10.00 % )</td><td>26</td><td>07/05</td><td>$ 80100</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>717 fifth avenue ( 14 )</td><td>sutton/nakash</td><td>32.75% ( 32.75 % )</td><td>32.75% ( 32.75 % )</td><td>120</td><td>09/06</td><td>$ 251900</td></tr></table> the meadows ( 10 ) onyx 50.00% ( 50.00 % ) 50.00% ( 50.00 % ) 582 09/07 $ 111500 388 and 390 greenwich street ( 11 ) sitq 50.60% ( 50.60 % ) 50.60% ( 50.60 % ) 2600 12/07 $ 1575000 27 201329 west 34th street ( 12 ) sutton 50.00% ( 50.00 % ) 50.00% ( 50.00 % ) 41 01/06 $ 30000 1551 20131555 broadway ( 13 ) sutton 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) 26 07/05 $ 80100 717 fifth avenue ( 14 ) sutton/nakash 32.75% ( 32.75 % ) 32.75% ( 32.75 % ) 120 09/06 $ 251900 ( 1 ) acquisition price represents the actual or implied purchase price for the joint venture . ( 2 ) we acquired our interest from the mcgraw-hill companies , or mhc . mhc is a tenant at the property and accounted for approximately 14.7% ( 14.7 % ) of the property 2019s annualized rent at december 31 , 2009 . we do not manage this joint venture . ( 3 ) under a tax protection agreement established to protect the limited partners of the partnership that transferred 1515 broadway to the joint venture , the joint venture has agreed not to adversely affect the limited partners 2019 tax positions before december 2011 . one tenant , whose leases primarily ends in 2015 , represents approximately 77.4% ( 77.4 % ) of this joint venture 2019s annualized rent at december 31 , 2009 . ( 4 ) effective november 2006 , we deconsolidated this investment . as a result of the recapitalization of the property , we were no longer the primary beneficiary . both partners had the same amount of equity at risk and neither partner controlled the joint venture . ( 5 ) we invested approximately $ 109.5 million in this asset through the origination of a loan secured by up to 47% ( 47 % ) of the interests in the property 2019s ownership , with an option to convert the loan to an equity interest . certain existing members have the right to re-acquire approximately 4% ( 4 % ) of the property 2019s equity . these interests were re-acquired in december 2008 and reduced our interest to 42.95% ( 42.95 % ) ( 6 ) effective april 2007 , we deconsolidated this investment . as a result of the recapitalization of the property , we were no longer the primary beneficiary . both partners had the same amount of equity at risk and neither partner controlled the joint venture . ( 7 ) we have the ability to syndicate our interest down to 14.79% ( 14.79 % ) . ( 8 ) we , along with gramercy , together as tenants-in-common , acquired a fee interest in 2 herald square . the fee interest is subject to a long-term operating lease . ( 9 ) we , along with gramercy , together as tenants-in-common , acquired a fee and leasehold interest in 885 third avenue . the fee and leasehold interests are subject to a long-term operating lease . ( 10 ) we , along with onyx acquired the remaining 50% ( 50 % ) interest on a pro-rata basis in september 2009 . ( 11 ) the property is subject to a 13-year triple-net lease arrangement with a single tenant . ( 12 ) effective may 2008 , we deconsolidated this investment . as a result of the recapitalization of the property , we were no longer the primary beneficiary . both partners had the same amount of equity at risk and neither partner controlled the joint venture . ( 13 ) effective august 2008 , we deconsolidated this investment . as a result of the sale of 80% ( 80 % ) of our interest , the joint venture was no longer a vie . ( 14 ) effective september 2008 , we deconsolidated this investment . as a result of the recapitalization of the property , we were no longer the primary beneficiary. .
Question: what is the acquisition price times 1000 for 1745 broadway?
Answer: 520000000.0
Question: what is that divided by its economic interest?
| 1611903285.80285 |
CONVFINQA4447 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
corporate income taxes other than withholding taxes on certain investment income and premium excise taxes . if group or its bermuda subsidiaries were to become subject to u.s . income tax , there could be a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flows . united kingdom . bermuda re 2019s uk branch conducts business in the uk and is subject to taxation in the uk . bermuda re believes that it has operated and will continue to operate its bermuda operation in a manner which will not cause them to be subject to uk taxation . if bermuda re 2019s bermuda operations were to become subject to uk income tax , there could be a material adverse impact on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flow . ireland . holdings ireland and ireland re conduct business in ireland and are subject to taxation in ireland . available information . the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8- k , proxy statements and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestregroup.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . subsequent to april 1 , 2010 , we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 10.0 million , before corporate level reinsurance and taxes . prior to april 1 , 2010 , we used a threshold of $ 5.0 million . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 195.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>410.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>1300.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2010</td><td>571.1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2009</td><td>67.4</td></tr></table> .
Question: what are the total pre-tax catastrophe losses in 2013 and 2012?
| 605.0 |
CONVFINQA4448 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
corporate income taxes other than withholding taxes on certain investment income and premium excise taxes . if group or its bermuda subsidiaries were to become subject to u.s . income tax , there could be a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flows . united kingdom . bermuda re 2019s uk branch conducts business in the uk and is subject to taxation in the uk . bermuda re believes that it has operated and will continue to operate its bermuda operation in a manner which will not cause them to be subject to uk taxation . if bermuda re 2019s bermuda operations were to become subject to uk income tax , there could be a material adverse impact on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flow . ireland . holdings ireland and ireland re conduct business in ireland and are subject to taxation in ireland . available information . the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8- k , proxy statements and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestregroup.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . subsequent to april 1 , 2010 , we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 10.0 million , before corporate level reinsurance and taxes . prior to april 1 , 2010 , we used a threshold of $ 5.0 million . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 195.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>410.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>1300.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2010</td><td>571.1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2009</td><td>67.4</td></tr></table> .
Question: what are the total pre-tax catastrophe losses in 2013 and 2012?
Answer: 605.0
Question: and including 2011?
| 1905.4 |
CONVFINQA4449 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
corporate income taxes other than withholding taxes on certain investment income and premium excise taxes . if group or its bermuda subsidiaries were to become subject to u.s . income tax , there could be a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flows . united kingdom . bermuda re 2019s uk branch conducts business in the uk and is subject to taxation in the uk . bermuda re believes that it has operated and will continue to operate its bermuda operation in a manner which will not cause them to be subject to uk taxation . if bermuda re 2019s bermuda operations were to become subject to uk income tax , there could be a material adverse impact on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flow . ireland . holdings ireland and ireland re conduct business in ireland and are subject to taxation in ireland . available information . the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8- k , proxy statements and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestregroup.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . subsequent to april 1 , 2010 , we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 10.0 million , before corporate level reinsurance and taxes . prior to april 1 , 2010 , we used a threshold of $ 5.0 million . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 195.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>410.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>1300.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2010</td><td>571.1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2009</td><td>67.4</td></tr></table> .
Question: what are the total pre-tax catastrophe losses in 2013 and 2012?
Answer: 605.0
Question: and including 2011?
Answer: 1905.4
Question: what was the change in pre-tax catastrophe losses between 2010 and 2011?
| 729.3 |
CONVFINQA4450 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
hologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) the company has considered the provision of eitf issue no . 95-8 , accounting for contingent consideration paid to the shareholders of and acquired enterprise in a purchase business combination , and concluded that this contingent consideration represents additional purchase price . during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 the company paid approximately $ 19000 to former suros shareholders for the first annual earn-out period resulting in an increase to goodwill for the same amount . goodwill will be increased by the amount of the additional consideration , if any , when it becomes due and payable for the second annual earn-out . in addition to the earn-out discussed above , the company increased goodwill related to the suros acquisition in the amount of $ 210 during the year ended september 29 , 2007 . the increase was primarily related to recording a liability of approximately $ 550 in accordance with eitf 95-3 related to the termination of certain employees who have ceased all services for the company . approximately $ 400 of this liability was paid during the year ended september 29 , 2007 and the balance is expected to be paid by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2008 . this increase was partially offset by a decrease to goodwill as a result of a change in the valuation of certain assets and liabilities acquired based on information received during the year ended september 29 , 2007 . there have been no other material changes to purchase price allocations as disclosed in the company 2019s form 10-k for the year ended september 30 , 2006 . as part of the purchase price allocation , all intangible assets that were a part of the acquisition were identified and valued . it was determined that only customer relationship , trade name , developed technology and know how and in-process research and development had separately identifiable values . customer relationship represents suros large installed base that are expected to purchase disposable products on a regular basis . trade name represent the suros product names that the company intends to continue to use . developed technology and know how represents currently marketable purchased products that the company continues to resell as well as utilize to enhance and incorporate into the company 2019s existing products . the estimated $ 4900 of purchase price allocated to in-process research and development projects primarily related to suros 2019 disposable products . the projects were at various stages of completion and include next generation handpiece and site marker technologies . the company has continued to work on these projects and expects they will be completed during fiscal 2008 . the deferred income tax liability relates to the tax effect of acquired identifiable intangible assets , and fair value adjustments to acquired inventory as such amounts are not deductible for tax purposes , partially offset by acquired net operating loss carry forwards that the company believes are realizable . for all of the acquisitions discussed above , goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the net identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired . the company determined that the acquisition of each aeg , biolucent , r2 and suros resulted in the recognition of goodwill primarily because of synergies unique to the company and the strength of its acquired workforce . supplemental unaudited pro-forma information the following unaudited pro forma information presents the consolidated results of operations of the company , r2 and suros as if the acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of fiscal 2006 , with pro forma adjustments to give effect to amortization of intangible assets , an increase in interest expense on acquisition financing and certain other adjustments together with related tax effects: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net revenue</td><td>$ 524340</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income</td><td>28649</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income per share 2014basic</td><td>$ 0.55</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net income per share 2014assuming dilution</td><td>$ 0.33</td></tr></table> .
Question: if the acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of fiscal 2006, how much would the net income have represented in relation to the net revenue in that year?
| 0.05464 |
CONVFINQA4451 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
hologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) the company has considered the provision of eitf issue no . 95-8 , accounting for contingent consideration paid to the shareholders of and acquired enterprise in a purchase business combination , and concluded that this contingent consideration represents additional purchase price . during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 the company paid approximately $ 19000 to former suros shareholders for the first annual earn-out period resulting in an increase to goodwill for the same amount . goodwill will be increased by the amount of the additional consideration , if any , when it becomes due and payable for the second annual earn-out . in addition to the earn-out discussed above , the company increased goodwill related to the suros acquisition in the amount of $ 210 during the year ended september 29 , 2007 . the increase was primarily related to recording a liability of approximately $ 550 in accordance with eitf 95-3 related to the termination of certain employees who have ceased all services for the company . approximately $ 400 of this liability was paid during the year ended september 29 , 2007 and the balance is expected to be paid by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2008 . this increase was partially offset by a decrease to goodwill as a result of a change in the valuation of certain assets and liabilities acquired based on information received during the year ended september 29 , 2007 . there have been no other material changes to purchase price allocations as disclosed in the company 2019s form 10-k for the year ended september 30 , 2006 . as part of the purchase price allocation , all intangible assets that were a part of the acquisition were identified and valued . it was determined that only customer relationship , trade name , developed technology and know how and in-process research and development had separately identifiable values . customer relationship represents suros large installed base that are expected to purchase disposable products on a regular basis . trade name represent the suros product names that the company intends to continue to use . developed technology and know how represents currently marketable purchased products that the company continues to resell as well as utilize to enhance and incorporate into the company 2019s existing products . the estimated $ 4900 of purchase price allocated to in-process research and development projects primarily related to suros 2019 disposable products . the projects were at various stages of completion and include next generation handpiece and site marker technologies . the company has continued to work on these projects and expects they will be completed during fiscal 2008 . the deferred income tax liability relates to the tax effect of acquired identifiable intangible assets , and fair value adjustments to acquired inventory as such amounts are not deductible for tax purposes , partially offset by acquired net operating loss carry forwards that the company believes are realizable . for all of the acquisitions discussed above , goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the net identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired . the company determined that the acquisition of each aeg , biolucent , r2 and suros resulted in the recognition of goodwill primarily because of synergies unique to the company and the strength of its acquired workforce . supplemental unaudited pro-forma information the following unaudited pro forma information presents the consolidated results of operations of the company , r2 and suros as if the acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of fiscal 2006 , with pro forma adjustments to give effect to amortization of intangible assets , an increase in interest expense on acquisition financing and certain other adjustments together with related tax effects: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net revenue</td><td>$ 524340</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income</td><td>28649</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income per share 2014basic</td><td>$ 0.55</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net income per share 2014assuming dilution</td><td>$ 0.33</td></tr></table> .
Question: if the acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of fiscal 2006, how much would the net income have represented in relation to the net revenue in that year?
Answer: 0.05464
Question: and considering that net income and the eps, what can be concluded to have been the number of shares outstanding in 2006?
| 52089.09091 |
CONVFINQA4452 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in addition , the company has reclassified the following amounts from 201cdistributions from other invested assets 201d included in cash flows from investing activities to 201cdistribution of limited partnership income 201d included in cash flows from operations for interim reporting periods of 2013 : $ 33686 thousand for the three months ended march 31 , 2013 ; $ 9409 thousand and $ 43095 thousand for the three months and six months ended june 30 , 2013 , respectively ; and $ 5638 thousand and $ 48733 thousand for the three months and nine months ended september 30 , 2013 , respectively . b . investments . fixed maturity and equity security investments available for sale , at market value , reflect unrealized appreciation and depreciation , as a result of temporary changes in market value during the period , in shareholders 2019 equity , net of income taxes in 201caccumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) 201d in the consolidated balance sheets . fixed maturity and equity securities carried at fair value reflect fair value re- measurements as net realized capital gains and losses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) . the company records changes in fair value for its fixed maturities available for sale , at market value through shareholders 2019 equity , net of taxes in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) since cash flows from these investments will be primarily used to settle its reserve for losses and loss adjustment expense liabilities . the company anticipates holding these investments for an extended period as the cash flow from interest and maturities will fund the projected payout of these liabilities . fixed maturities carried at fair value represent a portfolio of convertible bond securities , which have characteristics similar to equity securities and at times , designated foreign denominated fixed maturity securities , which will be used to settle loss and loss adjustment reserves in the same currency . the company carries all of its equity securities at fair value except for mutual fund investments whose underlying investments are comprised of fixed maturity securities . for equity securities , available for sale , at fair value , the company reflects changes in value as net realized capital gains and losses since these securities may be sold in the near term depending on financial market conditions . interest income on all fixed maturities and dividend income on all equity securities are included as part of net investment income in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) . unrealized losses on fixed maturities , which are deemed other-than-temporary and related to the credit quality of a security , are charged to net income ( loss ) as net realized capital losses . short-term investments are stated at cost , which approximates market value . realized gains or losses on sales of investments are determined on the basis of identified cost . for non- publicly traded securities , market prices are determined through the use of pricing models that evaluate securities relative to the u.s . treasury yield curve , taking into account the issue type , credit quality , and cash flow characteristics of each security . for publicly traded securities , market value is based on quoted market prices or valuation models that use observable market inputs . when a sector of the financial markets is inactive or illiquid , the company may use its own assumptions about future cash flows and risk-adjusted discount rates to determine fair value . retrospective adjustments are employed to recalculate the values of asset-backed securities . each acquisition lot is reviewed to recalculate the effective yield . the recalculated effective yield is used to derive a book value as if the new yield were applied at the time of acquisition . outstanding principal factors from the time of acquisition to the adjustment date are used to calculate the prepayment history for all applicable securities . conditional prepayment rates , computed with life to date factor histories and weighted average maturities , are used to effect the calculation of projected and prepayments for pass-through security types . other invested assets include limited partnerships , rabbi trusts and an affiliated entity . limited partnerships and the affiliated entity are accounted for under the equity method of accounting , which can be recorded on a monthly or quarterly lag . c . uncollectible receivable balances . the company provides reserves for uncollectible reinsurance recoverable and premium receivable balances based on management 2019s assessment of the collectability of the outstanding balances . such reserves are presented in the table below for the periods indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>reinsurance receivables and premium receivables</td><td>$ 29905</td><td>$ 32011</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the net change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2012 to 2013?
| -2106.0 |
CONVFINQA4453 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in addition , the company has reclassified the following amounts from 201cdistributions from other invested assets 201d included in cash flows from investing activities to 201cdistribution of limited partnership income 201d included in cash flows from operations for interim reporting periods of 2013 : $ 33686 thousand for the three months ended march 31 , 2013 ; $ 9409 thousand and $ 43095 thousand for the three months and six months ended june 30 , 2013 , respectively ; and $ 5638 thousand and $ 48733 thousand for the three months and nine months ended september 30 , 2013 , respectively . b . investments . fixed maturity and equity security investments available for sale , at market value , reflect unrealized appreciation and depreciation , as a result of temporary changes in market value during the period , in shareholders 2019 equity , net of income taxes in 201caccumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) 201d in the consolidated balance sheets . fixed maturity and equity securities carried at fair value reflect fair value re- measurements as net realized capital gains and losses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) . the company records changes in fair value for its fixed maturities available for sale , at market value through shareholders 2019 equity , net of taxes in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) since cash flows from these investments will be primarily used to settle its reserve for losses and loss adjustment expense liabilities . the company anticipates holding these investments for an extended period as the cash flow from interest and maturities will fund the projected payout of these liabilities . fixed maturities carried at fair value represent a portfolio of convertible bond securities , which have characteristics similar to equity securities and at times , designated foreign denominated fixed maturity securities , which will be used to settle loss and loss adjustment reserves in the same currency . the company carries all of its equity securities at fair value except for mutual fund investments whose underlying investments are comprised of fixed maturity securities . for equity securities , available for sale , at fair value , the company reflects changes in value as net realized capital gains and losses since these securities may be sold in the near term depending on financial market conditions . interest income on all fixed maturities and dividend income on all equity securities are included as part of net investment income in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) . unrealized losses on fixed maturities , which are deemed other-than-temporary and related to the credit quality of a security , are charged to net income ( loss ) as net realized capital losses . short-term investments are stated at cost , which approximates market value . realized gains or losses on sales of investments are determined on the basis of identified cost . for non- publicly traded securities , market prices are determined through the use of pricing models that evaluate securities relative to the u.s . treasury yield curve , taking into account the issue type , credit quality , and cash flow characteristics of each security . for publicly traded securities , market value is based on quoted market prices or valuation models that use observable market inputs . when a sector of the financial markets is inactive or illiquid , the company may use its own assumptions about future cash flows and risk-adjusted discount rates to determine fair value . retrospective adjustments are employed to recalculate the values of asset-backed securities . each acquisition lot is reviewed to recalculate the effective yield . the recalculated effective yield is used to derive a book value as if the new yield were applied at the time of acquisition . outstanding principal factors from the time of acquisition to the adjustment date are used to calculate the prepayment history for all applicable securities . conditional prepayment rates , computed with life to date factor histories and weighted average maturities , are used to effect the calculation of projected and prepayments for pass-through security types . other invested assets include limited partnerships , rabbi trusts and an affiliated entity . limited partnerships and the affiliated entity are accounted for under the equity method of accounting , which can be recorded on a monthly or quarterly lag . c . uncollectible receivable balances . the company provides reserves for uncollectible reinsurance recoverable and premium receivable balances based on management 2019s assessment of the collectability of the outstanding balances . such reserves are presented in the table below for the periods indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>reinsurance receivables and premium receivables</td><td>$ 29905</td><td>$ 32011</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the net change in the balance of reinsurance receivables and premium receivables from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: -2106.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| -0.06579 |
CONVFINQA4454 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2016 compared with 2015 net gains on investments of $ 57 million in 2016 decreased $ 52 million from 2015 due to lower net gains in 2016 . net gains on investments in 2015 included a $ 40 million gain related to the bkca acquisition and a $ 35 million unrealized gain on a private equity investment . interest and dividend income increased $ 14 million from 2015 primarily due to higher dividend income in 2016 . 2015 compared with 2014 net gains on investments of $ 109 million in 2015 decreased $ 45 million from 2014 due to lower net gains in 2015 . net gains on investments in 2015 included a $ 40 million gain related to the bkca acquisition and a $ 35 million unrealized gain on a private equity investment . net gains on investments in 2014 included the positive impact of the monetization of a nonstrategic , opportunistic private equity investment . interest expense decreased $ 28 million from 2014 primarily due to repayments of long-term borrowings in the fourth quarter of 2014 . income tax expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>gaap 2016</td><td>gaap 2015</td><td>gaap 2014</td><td>gaap 2016</td><td>gaap 2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating income ( 1 )</td><td>$ 4570</td><td>$ 4664</td><td>$ 4474</td><td>$ 4674</td><td>$ 4695</td><td>$ 4563</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 1 ) ( 2 )</td><td>-108 ( 108 )</td><td>-69 ( 69 )</td><td>-49 ( 49 )</td><td>-108 ( 108 )</td><td>-70 ( 70 )</td><td>-56 ( 56 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income before income taxes ( 2 )</td><td>$ 4462</td><td>$ 4595</td><td>$ 4425</td><td>$ 4566</td><td>$ 4625</td><td>$ 4507</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>$ 1290</td><td>$ 1250</td><td>$ 1131</td><td>$ 1352</td><td>$ 1312</td><td>$ 1197</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effective tax rate</td><td>28.9% ( 28.9 % )</td><td>27.2% ( 27.2 % )</td><td>25.6% ( 25.6 % )</td><td>29.6% ( 29.6 % )</td><td>28.4% ( 28.4 % )</td><td>26.6% ( 26.6 % )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) see non-gaap financial measures for further information on and reconciliation of as adjusted items . ( 2 ) net of net income ( loss ) attributable to nci . the company 2019s tax rate is affected by tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amount of income earned in those jurisdictions , which the company expects to be fairly consistent in the near term . the significant foreign jurisdictions that have lower statutory tax rates than the u.s . federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) include the united kingdom , channel islands , ireland and canada . u.s . income taxes were not provided for certain undistributed foreign earnings intended to be indefinitely reinvested outside the united states . 2016 . income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 a net noncash benefit of $ 30 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; and 2022 a benefit from $ 65 million of nonrecurring items , including the resolution of certain outstanding tax matters . the as adjusted effective tax rate of 29.6% ( 29.6 % ) for 2016 excluded the net noncash benefit of $ 30 million mentioned above , as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented . 2015 . income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 a net noncash benefit of $ 54 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; and 2022 a benefit from $ 75 million of nonrecurring items , primarily due to the realization of losses from changes in the company 2019s organizational tax structure and the resolution of certain outstanding tax matters . the as adjusted effective tax rate of 28.4% ( 28.4 % ) for 2015 excluded the net noncash benefit of $ 54 million mentioned above , as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented . 2014 . income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 a $ 94 million tax benefit , primarily due to the resolution of certain outstanding tax matters related to the acquisition of bgi , including the previously mentioned $ 50 million tax benefit ( see executive summary for more information ) ; 2022 a $ 73 million net tax benefit related to several favorable nonrecurring items ; and 2022 a net noncash benefit of $ 9 million associated with the revaluation of deferred income tax liabilities . the as adjusted effective tax rate of 26.6% ( 26.6 % ) for 2014 excluded the $ 9 million net noncash benefit as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented and the $ 50 million tax benefit mentioned above . the $ 50 million general and administrative expense and $ 50 million tax benefit have been excluded from as adjusted results as there is no impact on blackrock 2019s book value . balance sheet overview as adjusted balance sheet the following table presents a reconciliation of the consolidated statement of financial condition presented on a gaap basis to the consolidated statement of financial condition , excluding the impact of separate account assets and separate account collateral held under securities lending agreements ( directly related to lending separate account securities ) and separate account liabilities and separate account collateral liabilities under securities lending agreements and consolidated sponsored investment funds , including consolidated vies . the company presents the as adjusted balance sheet as additional information to enable investors to exclude certain .
Question: what was the net change in value of operating income from 2015 to 2016?
| -94.0 |
CONVFINQA4455 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2016 compared with 2015 net gains on investments of $ 57 million in 2016 decreased $ 52 million from 2015 due to lower net gains in 2016 . net gains on investments in 2015 included a $ 40 million gain related to the bkca acquisition and a $ 35 million unrealized gain on a private equity investment . interest and dividend income increased $ 14 million from 2015 primarily due to higher dividend income in 2016 . 2015 compared with 2014 net gains on investments of $ 109 million in 2015 decreased $ 45 million from 2014 due to lower net gains in 2015 . net gains on investments in 2015 included a $ 40 million gain related to the bkca acquisition and a $ 35 million unrealized gain on a private equity investment . net gains on investments in 2014 included the positive impact of the monetization of a nonstrategic , opportunistic private equity investment . interest expense decreased $ 28 million from 2014 primarily due to repayments of long-term borrowings in the fourth quarter of 2014 . income tax expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>gaap 2016</td><td>gaap 2015</td><td>gaap 2014</td><td>gaap 2016</td><td>gaap 2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating income ( 1 )</td><td>$ 4570</td><td>$ 4664</td><td>$ 4474</td><td>$ 4674</td><td>$ 4695</td><td>$ 4563</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 1 ) ( 2 )</td><td>-108 ( 108 )</td><td>-69 ( 69 )</td><td>-49 ( 49 )</td><td>-108 ( 108 )</td><td>-70 ( 70 )</td><td>-56 ( 56 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income before income taxes ( 2 )</td><td>$ 4462</td><td>$ 4595</td><td>$ 4425</td><td>$ 4566</td><td>$ 4625</td><td>$ 4507</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>$ 1290</td><td>$ 1250</td><td>$ 1131</td><td>$ 1352</td><td>$ 1312</td><td>$ 1197</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effective tax rate</td><td>28.9% ( 28.9 % )</td><td>27.2% ( 27.2 % )</td><td>25.6% ( 25.6 % )</td><td>29.6% ( 29.6 % )</td><td>28.4% ( 28.4 % )</td><td>26.6% ( 26.6 % )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) see non-gaap financial measures for further information on and reconciliation of as adjusted items . ( 2 ) net of net income ( loss ) attributable to nci . the company 2019s tax rate is affected by tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amount of income earned in those jurisdictions , which the company expects to be fairly consistent in the near term . the significant foreign jurisdictions that have lower statutory tax rates than the u.s . federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) include the united kingdom , channel islands , ireland and canada . u.s . income taxes were not provided for certain undistributed foreign earnings intended to be indefinitely reinvested outside the united states . 2016 . income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 a net noncash benefit of $ 30 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; and 2022 a benefit from $ 65 million of nonrecurring items , including the resolution of certain outstanding tax matters . the as adjusted effective tax rate of 29.6% ( 29.6 % ) for 2016 excluded the net noncash benefit of $ 30 million mentioned above , as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented . 2015 . income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 a net noncash benefit of $ 54 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; and 2022 a benefit from $ 75 million of nonrecurring items , primarily due to the realization of losses from changes in the company 2019s organizational tax structure and the resolution of certain outstanding tax matters . the as adjusted effective tax rate of 28.4% ( 28.4 % ) for 2015 excluded the net noncash benefit of $ 54 million mentioned above , as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented . 2014 . income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 a $ 94 million tax benefit , primarily due to the resolution of certain outstanding tax matters related to the acquisition of bgi , including the previously mentioned $ 50 million tax benefit ( see executive summary for more information ) ; 2022 a $ 73 million net tax benefit related to several favorable nonrecurring items ; and 2022 a net noncash benefit of $ 9 million associated with the revaluation of deferred income tax liabilities . the as adjusted effective tax rate of 26.6% ( 26.6 % ) for 2014 excluded the $ 9 million net noncash benefit as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented and the $ 50 million tax benefit mentioned above . the $ 50 million general and administrative expense and $ 50 million tax benefit have been excluded from as adjusted results as there is no impact on blackrock 2019s book value . balance sheet overview as adjusted balance sheet the following table presents a reconciliation of the consolidated statement of financial condition presented on a gaap basis to the consolidated statement of financial condition , excluding the impact of separate account assets and separate account collateral held under securities lending agreements ( directly related to lending separate account securities ) and separate account liabilities and separate account collateral liabilities under securities lending agreements and consolidated sponsored investment funds , including consolidated vies . the company presents the as adjusted balance sheet as additional information to enable investors to exclude certain .
Question: what was the net change in value of operating income from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: -94.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| -0.02015 |
CONVFINQA4456 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue . 2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 272.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>-16.9 ( 16.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gas revenue</td><td>-9.1 ( 9.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gas cost recovery asset</td><td>-3.0 ( 3.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>5.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-2.3 ( 2.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2011 net revenue</td><td>$ 247.0</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 . the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset . see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2011?
| 247.0 |
CONVFINQA4457 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue . 2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 272.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>-16.9 ( 16.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gas revenue</td><td>-9.1 ( 9.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gas cost recovery asset</td><td>-3.0 ( 3.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>5.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-2.3 ( 2.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2011 net revenue</td><td>$ 247.0</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 . the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset . see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2011?
Answer: 247.0
Question: what about in 2010?
| 272.9 |
CONVFINQA4458 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue . 2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 272.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>-16.9 ( 16.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gas revenue</td><td>-9.1 ( 9.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gas cost recovery asset</td><td>-3.0 ( 3.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>5.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-2.3 ( 2.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2011 net revenue</td><td>$ 247.0</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 . the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset . see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2011?
Answer: 247.0
Question: what about in 2010?
Answer: 272.9
Question: what is the net change?
| -25.9 |
CONVFINQA4459 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue . 2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 272.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>-16.9 ( 16.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gas revenue</td><td>-9.1 ( 9.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gas cost recovery asset</td><td>-3.0 ( 3.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>5.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-2.3 ( 2.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2011 net revenue</td><td>$ 247.0</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 . the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset . see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2011?
Answer: 247.0
Question: what about in 2010?
Answer: 272.9
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -25.9
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
| -0.09491 |
CONVFINQA4460 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue . 2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 272.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>-16.9 ( 16.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gas revenue</td><td>-9.1 ( 9.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gas cost recovery asset</td><td>-3.0 ( 3.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>5.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-2.3 ( 2.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2011 net revenue</td><td>$ 247.0</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 . the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset . see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2011?
Answer: 247.0
Question: what about in 2010?
Answer: 272.9
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -25.9
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
Answer: -0.09491
Question: what is the impact of retail electric price in the net revenue?
| -16.9 |
CONVFINQA4461 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue . 2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 272.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>-16.9 ( 16.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gas revenue</td><td>-9.1 ( 9.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gas cost recovery asset</td><td>-3.0 ( 3.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>5.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-2.3 ( 2.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2011 net revenue</td><td>$ 247.0</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 . the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset . see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2011?
Answer: 247.0
Question: what about in 2010?
Answer: 272.9
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -25.9
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
Answer: -0.09491
Question: what is the impact of retail electric price in the net revenue?
Answer: -16.9
Question: what proportion of the net change in net revenue does this represent?
| 0.65251 |
CONVFINQA4462 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 28 , 2012 through october 29 , 2017 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 28 , 2012 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/28/12 in stock or 10/31/12 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>10/28/2012</td><td>10/27/2013</td><td>10/26/2014</td><td>10/25/2015</td><td>10/30/2016</td><td>10/29/2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>applied materials</td><td>100.00</td><td>171.03</td><td>207.01</td><td>165.34</td><td>293.64</td><td>586.91</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>127.18</td><td>149.14</td><td>156.89</td><td>163.97</td><td>202.72</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rdg semiconductor composite index</td><td>100.00</td><td>131.94</td><td>167.25</td><td>160.80</td><td>193.36</td><td>288.96</td></tr></table> dividends during each of fiscal 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.10 per share . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 10/30/16 10/29/17 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .
Question: what was the price of applied materials in 2015?
| 165.34 |
CONVFINQA4463 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 28 , 2012 through october 29 , 2017 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 28 , 2012 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/28/12 in stock or 10/31/12 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>10/28/2012</td><td>10/27/2013</td><td>10/26/2014</td><td>10/25/2015</td><td>10/30/2016</td><td>10/29/2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>applied materials</td><td>100.00</td><td>171.03</td><td>207.01</td><td>165.34</td><td>293.64</td><td>586.91</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>127.18</td><td>149.14</td><td>156.89</td><td>163.97</td><td>202.72</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rdg semiconductor composite index</td><td>100.00</td><td>131.94</td><td>167.25</td><td>160.80</td><td>193.36</td><td>288.96</td></tr></table> dividends during each of fiscal 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.10 per share . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 10/30/16 10/29/17 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .
Question: what was the price of applied materials in 2015?
Answer: 165.34
Question: what was the price less the initial investment of 100?
| 65.34 |
CONVFINQA4464 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 28 , 2012 through october 29 , 2017 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 28 , 2012 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/28/12 in stock or 10/31/12 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>10/28/2012</td><td>10/27/2013</td><td>10/26/2014</td><td>10/25/2015</td><td>10/30/2016</td><td>10/29/2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>applied materials</td><td>100.00</td><td>171.03</td><td>207.01</td><td>165.34</td><td>293.64</td><td>586.91</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>127.18</td><td>149.14</td><td>156.89</td><td>163.97</td><td>202.72</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rdg semiconductor composite index</td><td>100.00</td><td>131.94</td><td>167.25</td><td>160.80</td><td>193.36</td><td>288.96</td></tr></table> dividends during each of fiscal 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.10 per share . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 10/30/16 10/29/17 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .
Question: what was the price of applied materials in 2015?
Answer: 165.34
Question: what was the price less the initial investment of 100?
Answer: 65.34
Question: what is the change to investment ratio?
| 0.6534 |
CONVFINQA4465 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in connection with our assessment of impairment we recorded gross other-than-temporary impairment of $ 1.15 billion for 2009 , compared to $ 122 million for 2008 . of the total recorded , $ 227 million related to credit and was recognized in our consolidated statement of income . the remaining $ 928 million related to factors other than credit , more fully discussed below , and was recognized , net of related taxes , in oci in our consolidated statement of condition . the $ 227 million was composed of $ 151 million associated with expected credit losses , $ 54 million related to management 2019s decision to sell the impaired securities prior to their recovery in value , and $ 22 million related to adverse changes in the timing of expected future cash flows from the securities . the majority of the impairment losses related to non-agency securities collateralized by mortgages , for which management concluded had experienced credit losses based on the present value of the securities 2019 expected future cash flows . these securities are classified as asset-backed securities in the foregoing investment securities tables . as described in note 1 , management periodically reviews the fair values of investment securities to determine if other-than-temporary impairment has occurred . this review encompasses all investment securities and includes such quantitative factors as current and expected future interest rates and the length of time that a security 2019s cost basis has exceeded its fair value , and includes investment securities for which we have issuer- specific concerns regardless of quantitative factors . gains and losses related to investment securities were as follows for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross gains from sales of available-for-sale securities</td><td>$ 418</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 24</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross losses from sales of available-for-sale securities</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross losses from other-than-temporary impairment</td><td>-1155 ( 1155 )</td><td>-122 ( 122 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>losses not related to credit ( 1 )</td><td>928</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net impairment losses</td><td>-227 ( 227 )</td><td>-122 ( 122 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>gains ( losses ) related to investment securities net</td><td>$ 141</td><td>$ -54 ( 54 )</td><td>$ -27 ( 27 )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) these losses were recognized as a component of oci ; see note 12 . we conduct periodic reviews to evaluate each security that is impaired . impairment exists when the current fair value of an individual security is below its amortized cost basis . for debt securities available for sale and held to maturity , other-than-temporary impairment is recorded in our consolidated statement of income when management intends to sell ( or may be required to sell ) securities before they recover in value , or when management expects the present value of cash flows expected to be collected to be less than the amortized cost of the impaired security ( a credit loss ) . our review of impaired securities generally includes : 2022 the identification and evaluation of securities that have indications of possible other-than-temporary impairment , such as issuer-specific concerns including deteriorating financial condition or bankruptcy ; 2022 the analysis of expected future cash flows of securities , based on quantitative and qualitative factors ; 2022 the analysis of the collectability of those future cash flows , including information about past events , current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts ; 2022 the analysis of individual impaired securities , including consideration of the length of time the security has been in an unrealized loss position and the anticipated recovery period ; 2022 the discussion of evidential matter , including an evaluation of factors or triggers that could cause individual securities to be deemed other-than-temporarily impaired and those that would not support other-than-temporary impairment ; and 2022 documentation of the results of these analyses . factors considered in determining whether impairment is other than temporary include : 2022 the length of time the security has been impaired; .
Question: what was the gross gains from sales of available for sale securities in 2009?
| 418.0 |
CONVFINQA4466 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in connection with our assessment of impairment we recorded gross other-than-temporary impairment of $ 1.15 billion for 2009 , compared to $ 122 million for 2008 . of the total recorded , $ 227 million related to credit and was recognized in our consolidated statement of income . the remaining $ 928 million related to factors other than credit , more fully discussed below , and was recognized , net of related taxes , in oci in our consolidated statement of condition . the $ 227 million was composed of $ 151 million associated with expected credit losses , $ 54 million related to management 2019s decision to sell the impaired securities prior to their recovery in value , and $ 22 million related to adverse changes in the timing of expected future cash flows from the securities . the majority of the impairment losses related to non-agency securities collateralized by mortgages , for which management concluded had experienced credit losses based on the present value of the securities 2019 expected future cash flows . these securities are classified as asset-backed securities in the foregoing investment securities tables . as described in note 1 , management periodically reviews the fair values of investment securities to determine if other-than-temporary impairment has occurred . this review encompasses all investment securities and includes such quantitative factors as current and expected future interest rates and the length of time that a security 2019s cost basis has exceeded its fair value , and includes investment securities for which we have issuer- specific concerns regardless of quantitative factors . gains and losses related to investment securities were as follows for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross gains from sales of available-for-sale securities</td><td>$ 418</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 24</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross losses from sales of available-for-sale securities</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross losses from other-than-temporary impairment</td><td>-1155 ( 1155 )</td><td>-122 ( 122 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>losses not related to credit ( 1 )</td><td>928</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net impairment losses</td><td>-227 ( 227 )</td><td>-122 ( 122 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>gains ( losses ) related to investment securities net</td><td>$ 141</td><td>$ -54 ( 54 )</td><td>$ -27 ( 27 )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) these losses were recognized as a component of oci ; see note 12 . we conduct periodic reviews to evaluate each security that is impaired . impairment exists when the current fair value of an individual security is below its amortized cost basis . for debt securities available for sale and held to maturity , other-than-temporary impairment is recorded in our consolidated statement of income when management intends to sell ( or may be required to sell ) securities before they recover in value , or when management expects the present value of cash flows expected to be collected to be less than the amortized cost of the impaired security ( a credit loss ) . our review of impaired securities generally includes : 2022 the identification and evaluation of securities that have indications of possible other-than-temporary impairment , such as issuer-specific concerns including deteriorating financial condition or bankruptcy ; 2022 the analysis of expected future cash flows of securities , based on quantitative and qualitative factors ; 2022 the analysis of the collectability of those future cash flows , including information about past events , current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts ; 2022 the analysis of individual impaired securities , including consideration of the length of time the security has been in an unrealized loss position and the anticipated recovery period ; 2022 the discussion of evidential matter , including an evaluation of factors or triggers that could cause individual securities to be deemed other-than-temporarily impaired and those that would not support other-than-temporary impairment ; and 2022 documentation of the results of these analyses . factors considered in determining whether impairment is other than temporary include : 2022 the length of time the security has been impaired; .
Question: what was the gross gains from sales of available for sale securities in 2009?
Answer: 418.0
Question: and in 2008?
| 100.0 |
CONVFINQA4467 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in connection with our assessment of impairment we recorded gross other-than-temporary impairment of $ 1.15 billion for 2009 , compared to $ 122 million for 2008 . of the total recorded , $ 227 million related to credit and was recognized in our consolidated statement of income . the remaining $ 928 million related to factors other than credit , more fully discussed below , and was recognized , net of related taxes , in oci in our consolidated statement of condition . the $ 227 million was composed of $ 151 million associated with expected credit losses , $ 54 million related to management 2019s decision to sell the impaired securities prior to their recovery in value , and $ 22 million related to adverse changes in the timing of expected future cash flows from the securities . the majority of the impairment losses related to non-agency securities collateralized by mortgages , for which management concluded had experienced credit losses based on the present value of the securities 2019 expected future cash flows . these securities are classified as asset-backed securities in the foregoing investment securities tables . as described in note 1 , management periodically reviews the fair values of investment securities to determine if other-than-temporary impairment has occurred . this review encompasses all investment securities and includes such quantitative factors as current and expected future interest rates and the length of time that a security 2019s cost basis has exceeded its fair value , and includes investment securities for which we have issuer- specific concerns regardless of quantitative factors . gains and losses related to investment securities were as follows for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross gains from sales of available-for-sale securities</td><td>$ 418</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 24</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross losses from sales of available-for-sale securities</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross losses from other-than-temporary impairment</td><td>-1155 ( 1155 )</td><td>-122 ( 122 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>losses not related to credit ( 1 )</td><td>928</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net impairment losses</td><td>-227 ( 227 )</td><td>-122 ( 122 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>gains ( losses ) related to investment securities net</td><td>$ 141</td><td>$ -54 ( 54 )</td><td>$ -27 ( 27 )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) these losses were recognized as a component of oci ; see note 12 . we conduct periodic reviews to evaluate each security that is impaired . impairment exists when the current fair value of an individual security is below its amortized cost basis . for debt securities available for sale and held to maturity , other-than-temporary impairment is recorded in our consolidated statement of income when management intends to sell ( or may be required to sell ) securities before they recover in value , or when management expects the present value of cash flows expected to be collected to be less than the amortized cost of the impaired security ( a credit loss ) . our review of impaired securities generally includes : 2022 the identification and evaluation of securities that have indications of possible other-than-temporary impairment , such as issuer-specific concerns including deteriorating financial condition or bankruptcy ; 2022 the analysis of expected future cash flows of securities , based on quantitative and qualitative factors ; 2022 the analysis of the collectability of those future cash flows , including information about past events , current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts ; 2022 the analysis of individual impaired securities , including consideration of the length of time the security has been in an unrealized loss position and the anticipated recovery period ; 2022 the discussion of evidential matter , including an evaluation of factors or triggers that could cause individual securities to be deemed other-than-temporarily impaired and those that would not support other-than-temporary impairment ; and 2022 documentation of the results of these analyses . factors considered in determining whether impairment is other than temporary include : 2022 the length of time the security has been impaired; .
Question: what was the gross gains from sales of available for sale securities in 2009?
Answer: 418.0
Question: and in 2008?
Answer: 100.0
Question: so what was the change in value between these two years?
| 318.0 |
CONVFINQA4468 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in connection with our assessment of impairment we recorded gross other-than-temporary impairment of $ 1.15 billion for 2009 , compared to $ 122 million for 2008 . of the total recorded , $ 227 million related to credit and was recognized in our consolidated statement of income . the remaining $ 928 million related to factors other than credit , more fully discussed below , and was recognized , net of related taxes , in oci in our consolidated statement of condition . the $ 227 million was composed of $ 151 million associated with expected credit losses , $ 54 million related to management 2019s decision to sell the impaired securities prior to their recovery in value , and $ 22 million related to adverse changes in the timing of expected future cash flows from the securities . the majority of the impairment losses related to non-agency securities collateralized by mortgages , for which management concluded had experienced credit losses based on the present value of the securities 2019 expected future cash flows . these securities are classified as asset-backed securities in the foregoing investment securities tables . as described in note 1 , management periodically reviews the fair values of investment securities to determine if other-than-temporary impairment has occurred . this review encompasses all investment securities and includes such quantitative factors as current and expected future interest rates and the length of time that a security 2019s cost basis has exceeded its fair value , and includes investment securities for which we have issuer- specific concerns regardless of quantitative factors . gains and losses related to investment securities were as follows for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross gains from sales of available-for-sale securities</td><td>$ 418</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 24</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross losses from sales of available-for-sale securities</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross losses from other-than-temporary impairment</td><td>-1155 ( 1155 )</td><td>-122 ( 122 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>losses not related to credit ( 1 )</td><td>928</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net impairment losses</td><td>-227 ( 227 )</td><td>-122 ( 122 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>gains ( losses ) related to investment securities net</td><td>$ 141</td><td>$ -54 ( 54 )</td><td>$ -27 ( 27 )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) these losses were recognized as a component of oci ; see note 12 . we conduct periodic reviews to evaluate each security that is impaired . impairment exists when the current fair value of an individual security is below its amortized cost basis . for debt securities available for sale and held to maturity , other-than-temporary impairment is recorded in our consolidated statement of income when management intends to sell ( or may be required to sell ) securities before they recover in value , or when management expects the present value of cash flows expected to be collected to be less than the amortized cost of the impaired security ( a credit loss ) . our review of impaired securities generally includes : 2022 the identification and evaluation of securities that have indications of possible other-than-temporary impairment , such as issuer-specific concerns including deteriorating financial condition or bankruptcy ; 2022 the analysis of expected future cash flows of securities , based on quantitative and qualitative factors ; 2022 the analysis of the collectability of those future cash flows , including information about past events , current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts ; 2022 the analysis of individual impaired securities , including consideration of the length of time the security has been in an unrealized loss position and the anticipated recovery period ; 2022 the discussion of evidential matter , including an evaluation of factors or triggers that could cause individual securities to be deemed other-than-temporarily impaired and those that would not support other-than-temporary impairment ; and 2022 documentation of the results of these analyses . factors considered in determining whether impairment is other than temporary include : 2022 the length of time the security has been impaired; .
Question: what was the gross gains from sales of available for sale securities in 2009?
Answer: 418.0
Question: and in 2008?
Answer: 100.0
Question: so what was the change in value between these two years?
Answer: 318.0
Question: and the value for 2008 again?
| 100.0 |
CONVFINQA4469 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in connection with our assessment of impairment we recorded gross other-than-temporary impairment of $ 1.15 billion for 2009 , compared to $ 122 million for 2008 . of the total recorded , $ 227 million related to credit and was recognized in our consolidated statement of income . the remaining $ 928 million related to factors other than credit , more fully discussed below , and was recognized , net of related taxes , in oci in our consolidated statement of condition . the $ 227 million was composed of $ 151 million associated with expected credit losses , $ 54 million related to management 2019s decision to sell the impaired securities prior to their recovery in value , and $ 22 million related to adverse changes in the timing of expected future cash flows from the securities . the majority of the impairment losses related to non-agency securities collateralized by mortgages , for which management concluded had experienced credit losses based on the present value of the securities 2019 expected future cash flows . these securities are classified as asset-backed securities in the foregoing investment securities tables . as described in note 1 , management periodically reviews the fair values of investment securities to determine if other-than-temporary impairment has occurred . this review encompasses all investment securities and includes such quantitative factors as current and expected future interest rates and the length of time that a security 2019s cost basis has exceeded its fair value , and includes investment securities for which we have issuer- specific concerns regardless of quantitative factors . gains and losses related to investment securities were as follows for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross gains from sales of available-for-sale securities</td><td>$ 418</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 24</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross losses from sales of available-for-sale securities</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross losses from other-than-temporary impairment</td><td>-1155 ( 1155 )</td><td>-122 ( 122 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>losses not related to credit ( 1 )</td><td>928</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net impairment losses</td><td>-227 ( 227 )</td><td>-122 ( 122 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>gains ( losses ) related to investment securities net</td><td>$ 141</td><td>$ -54 ( 54 )</td><td>$ -27 ( 27 )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) these losses were recognized as a component of oci ; see note 12 . we conduct periodic reviews to evaluate each security that is impaired . impairment exists when the current fair value of an individual security is below its amortized cost basis . for debt securities available for sale and held to maturity , other-than-temporary impairment is recorded in our consolidated statement of income when management intends to sell ( or may be required to sell ) securities before they recover in value , or when management expects the present value of cash flows expected to be collected to be less than the amortized cost of the impaired security ( a credit loss ) . our review of impaired securities generally includes : 2022 the identification and evaluation of securities that have indications of possible other-than-temporary impairment , such as issuer-specific concerns including deteriorating financial condition or bankruptcy ; 2022 the analysis of expected future cash flows of securities , based on quantitative and qualitative factors ; 2022 the analysis of the collectability of those future cash flows , including information about past events , current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts ; 2022 the analysis of individual impaired securities , including consideration of the length of time the security has been in an unrealized loss position and the anticipated recovery period ; 2022 the discussion of evidential matter , including an evaluation of factors or triggers that could cause individual securities to be deemed other-than-temporarily impaired and those that would not support other-than-temporary impairment ; and 2022 documentation of the results of these analyses . factors considered in determining whether impairment is other than temporary include : 2022 the length of time the security has been impaired; .
Question: what was the gross gains from sales of available for sale securities in 2009?
Answer: 418.0
Question: and in 2008?
Answer: 100.0
Question: so what was the change in value between these two years?
Answer: 318.0
Question: and the value for 2008 again?
Answer: 100.0
Question: and the percentage change?
| 3.18 |
CONVFINQA4470 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the acquisition . awards may be granted under the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , after december 5 , 2008 only to employees and consultants of allied waste industries , inc . and its subsidiaries who were not employed by republic services , inc . prior to such date . at december 31 , 2010 , there were approximately 15.3 million shares of common stock reserved for future grants under the 2006 plan . stock options we use a binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants . we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier . expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one-year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option . the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option . we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures and expected life of the options . when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 were $ 5.28 , $ 3.79 and $ 4.36 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>28.6% ( 28.6 % )</td><td>28.7% ( 28.7 % )</td><td>27.3% ( 27.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.7% ( 1.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td><td>3.1% ( 3.1 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( in years )</td><td>4.3</td><td>4.2</td><td>4.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>contractual life ( in years )</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected forfeiture rate</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td></tr></table> republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements , continued .
Question: what is the expected volatility in 2009?
| 28.7 |
CONVFINQA4471 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the acquisition . awards may be granted under the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , after december 5 , 2008 only to employees and consultants of allied waste industries , inc . and its subsidiaries who were not employed by republic services , inc . prior to such date . at december 31 , 2010 , there were approximately 15.3 million shares of common stock reserved for future grants under the 2006 plan . stock options we use a binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants . we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier . expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one-year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option . the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option . we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures and expected life of the options . when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 were $ 5.28 , $ 3.79 and $ 4.36 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>28.6% ( 28.6 % )</td><td>28.7% ( 28.7 % )</td><td>27.3% ( 27.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.7% ( 1.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td><td>3.1% ( 3.1 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( in years )</td><td>4.3</td><td>4.2</td><td>4.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>contractual life ( in years )</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected forfeiture rate</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td></tr></table> republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements , continued .
Question: what is the expected volatility in 2009?
Answer: 28.7
Question: what about in 2008?
| 27.3 |
CONVFINQA4472 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the acquisition . awards may be granted under the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , after december 5 , 2008 only to employees and consultants of allied waste industries , inc . and its subsidiaries who were not employed by republic services , inc . prior to such date . at december 31 , 2010 , there were approximately 15.3 million shares of common stock reserved for future grants under the 2006 plan . stock options we use a binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants . we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier . expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one-year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option . the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option . we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures and expected life of the options . when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 were $ 5.28 , $ 3.79 and $ 4.36 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>28.6% ( 28.6 % )</td><td>28.7% ( 28.7 % )</td><td>27.3% ( 27.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.7% ( 1.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td><td>3.1% ( 3.1 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( in years )</td><td>4.3</td><td>4.2</td><td>4.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>contractual life ( in years )</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected forfeiture rate</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td></tr></table> republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements , continued .
Question: what is the expected volatility in 2009?
Answer: 28.7
Question: what about in 2008?
Answer: 27.3
Question: net change from 2008 to 2009?
| 1.4 |
CONVFINQA4473 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the acquisition . awards may be granted under the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , after december 5 , 2008 only to employees and consultants of allied waste industries , inc . and its subsidiaries who were not employed by republic services , inc . prior to such date . at december 31 , 2010 , there were approximately 15.3 million shares of common stock reserved for future grants under the 2006 plan . stock options we use a binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants . we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier . expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one-year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option . the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option . we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures and expected life of the options . when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 were $ 5.28 , $ 3.79 and $ 4.36 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>28.6% ( 28.6 % )</td><td>28.7% ( 28.7 % )</td><td>27.3% ( 27.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.7% ( 1.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td><td>3.1% ( 3.1 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( in years )</td><td>4.3</td><td>4.2</td><td>4.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>contractual life ( in years )</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected forfeiture rate</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td></tr></table> republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements , continued .
Question: what is the expected volatility in 2009?
Answer: 28.7
Question: what about in 2008?
Answer: 27.3
Question: net change from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 1.4
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.05128 |
CONVFINQA4474 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the acquisition . awards may be granted under the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , after december 5 , 2008 only to employees and consultants of allied waste industries , inc . and its subsidiaries who were not employed by republic services , inc . prior to such date . at december 31 , 2010 , there were approximately 15.3 million shares of common stock reserved for future grants under the 2006 plan . stock options we use a binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants . we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier . expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one-year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option . the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option . we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures and expected life of the options . when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 were $ 5.28 , $ 3.79 and $ 4.36 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>28.6% ( 28.6 % )</td><td>28.7% ( 28.7 % )</td><td>27.3% ( 27.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.7% ( 1.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td><td>3.1% ( 3.1 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( in years )</td><td>4.3</td><td>4.2</td><td>4.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>contractual life ( in years )</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected forfeiture rate</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td></tr></table> republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements , continued .
Question: what is the expected volatility in 2009?
Answer: 28.7
Question: what about in 2008?
Answer: 27.3
Question: net change from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 1.4
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.05128
Question: what about the net change in the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted from 2009 to 20010?
| 1.49 |
CONVFINQA4475 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the acquisition . awards may be granted under the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , after december 5 , 2008 only to employees and consultants of allied waste industries , inc . and its subsidiaries who were not employed by republic services , inc . prior to such date . at december 31 , 2010 , there were approximately 15.3 million shares of common stock reserved for future grants under the 2006 plan . stock options we use a binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants . we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier . expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one-year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option . the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option . we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures and expected life of the options . when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 were $ 5.28 , $ 3.79 and $ 4.36 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>28.6% ( 28.6 % )</td><td>28.7% ( 28.7 % )</td><td>27.3% ( 27.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.7% ( 1.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td><td>3.1% ( 3.1 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( in years )</td><td>4.3</td><td>4.2</td><td>4.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>contractual life ( in years )</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected forfeiture rate</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td></tr></table> republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements , continued .
Question: what is the expected volatility in 2009?
Answer: 28.7
Question: what about in 2008?
Answer: 27.3
Question: net change from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 1.4
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.05128
Question: what about the net change in the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted from 2009 to 20010?
Answer: 1.49
Question: what is the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted in 2009?
| 3.79 |
CONVFINQA4476 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the acquisition . awards may be granted under the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , after december 5 , 2008 only to employees and consultants of allied waste industries , inc . and its subsidiaries who were not employed by republic services , inc . prior to such date . at december 31 , 2010 , there were approximately 15.3 million shares of common stock reserved for future grants under the 2006 plan . stock options we use a binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants . we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier . expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one-year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option . the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option . we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures and expected life of the options . when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 were $ 5.28 , $ 3.79 and $ 4.36 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>28.6% ( 28.6 % )</td><td>28.7% ( 28.7 % )</td><td>27.3% ( 27.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.7% ( 1.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td><td>3.1% ( 3.1 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected life ( in years )</td><td>4.3</td><td>4.2</td><td>4.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>contractual life ( in years )</td><td>7</td><td>7</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected forfeiture rate</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td></tr></table> republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements , continued .
Question: what is the expected volatility in 2009?
Answer: 28.7
Question: what about in 2008?
Answer: 27.3
Question: net change from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 1.4
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.05128
Question: what about the net change in the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted from 2009 to 20010?
Answer: 1.49
Question: what is the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted in 2009?
Answer: 3.79
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.39314 |
CONVFINQA4477 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) funding deposits : we provide products and services including custody , accounting , administration , daily pricing , foreign exchange services , cash management , financial asset management , securities finance and investment advisory services . as a provider of these products and services , we generate client deposits , which have generally provided a stable , low-cost source of funds . as a global custodian , clients place deposits with state street entities in various currencies . we invest these client deposits in a combination of investment securities and short- duration financial instruments whose mix is determined by the characteristics of the deposits . for the past several years , we have experienced higher client deposit inflows toward the end of the quarter or the end of the year . as a result , we believe average client deposit balances are more reflective of ongoing funding than period-end balances . table 33 : client deposits average balance december 31 , year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>client deposits ( 1 )</td><td>$ 195276</td><td>$ 182268</td><td>$ 167470</td><td>$ 143043</td></tr></table> client deposits ( 1 ) $ 195276 $ 182268 $ 167470 $ 143043 ( 1 ) balance as of december 31 , 2014 excluded term wholesale certificates of deposit , or cds , of $ 13.76 billion ; average balances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 excluded average cds of $ 6.87 billion and $ 2.50 billion , respectively . short-term funding : our corporate commercial paper program , under which we can issue up to $ 3.0 billion of commercial paper with original maturities of up to 270 days from the date of issuance , had $ 2.48 billion and $ 1.82 billion of commercial paper outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy . these assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets , but more importantly , they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales . in addition , our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors . as discussed earlier under 201casset liquidity , 201d state street bank's membership in the fhlb allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral . short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase . these transactions are short-term in nature , generally overnight , and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities . these balances were $ 8.93 billion and $ 7.95 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad $ 800 million , or approximately $ 690 million as of december 31 , 2014 , to support its canadian securities processing operations . the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice . as of december 31 , 2014 , there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit . long-term funding : as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank had board authority to issue unsecured senior debt securities from time to time , provided that the aggregate principal amount of such unsecured senior debt outstanding at any one time does not exceed $ 5 billion . as of december 31 , 2014 , $ 4.1 billion was available for issuance pursuant to this authority . as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank also had board authority to issue an additional $ 500 million of subordinated debt . we maintain an effective universal shelf registration that allows for the public offering and sale of debt securities , capital securities , common stock , depositary shares and preferred stock , and warrants to purchase such securities , including any shares into which the preferred stock and depositary shares may be convertible , or any combination thereof . we have issued in the past , and we may issue in the future , securities pursuant to our shelf registration . the issuance of debt or equity securities will depend on future market conditions , funding needs and other factors . agency credit ratings our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies . factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include diverse and stable core earnings ; relative market position ; strong risk management ; strong capital ratios ; diverse liquidity sources , including the global capital markets and client deposits ; strong liquidity monitoring procedures ; and preparedness for current or future regulatory developments . high ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors , increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products , serve markets , and engage in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings . a downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital .
Question: what was the change in value of cds that were excluded between 2013 and 2014?
| 4.37 |
CONVFINQA4478 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) funding deposits : we provide products and services including custody , accounting , administration , daily pricing , foreign exchange services , cash management , financial asset management , securities finance and investment advisory services . as a provider of these products and services , we generate client deposits , which have generally provided a stable , low-cost source of funds . as a global custodian , clients place deposits with state street entities in various currencies . we invest these client deposits in a combination of investment securities and short- duration financial instruments whose mix is determined by the characteristics of the deposits . for the past several years , we have experienced higher client deposit inflows toward the end of the quarter or the end of the year . as a result , we believe average client deposit balances are more reflective of ongoing funding than period-end balances . table 33 : client deposits average balance december 31 , year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>client deposits ( 1 )</td><td>$ 195276</td><td>$ 182268</td><td>$ 167470</td><td>$ 143043</td></tr></table> client deposits ( 1 ) $ 195276 $ 182268 $ 167470 $ 143043 ( 1 ) balance as of december 31 , 2014 excluded term wholesale certificates of deposit , or cds , of $ 13.76 billion ; average balances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 excluded average cds of $ 6.87 billion and $ 2.50 billion , respectively . short-term funding : our corporate commercial paper program , under which we can issue up to $ 3.0 billion of commercial paper with original maturities of up to 270 days from the date of issuance , had $ 2.48 billion and $ 1.82 billion of commercial paper outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy . these assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets , but more importantly , they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales . in addition , our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors . as discussed earlier under 201casset liquidity , 201d state street bank's membership in the fhlb allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral . short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase . these transactions are short-term in nature , generally overnight , and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities . these balances were $ 8.93 billion and $ 7.95 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad $ 800 million , or approximately $ 690 million as of december 31 , 2014 , to support its canadian securities processing operations . the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice . as of december 31 , 2014 , there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit . long-term funding : as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank had board authority to issue unsecured senior debt securities from time to time , provided that the aggregate principal amount of such unsecured senior debt outstanding at any one time does not exceed $ 5 billion . as of december 31 , 2014 , $ 4.1 billion was available for issuance pursuant to this authority . as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank also had board authority to issue an additional $ 500 million of subordinated debt . we maintain an effective universal shelf registration that allows for the public offering and sale of debt securities , capital securities , common stock , depositary shares and preferred stock , and warrants to purchase such securities , including any shares into which the preferred stock and depositary shares may be convertible , or any combination thereof . we have issued in the past , and we may issue in the future , securities pursuant to our shelf registration . the issuance of debt or equity securities will depend on future market conditions , funding needs and other factors . agency credit ratings our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies . factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include diverse and stable core earnings ; relative market position ; strong risk management ; strong capital ratios ; diverse liquidity sources , including the global capital markets and client deposits ; strong liquidity monitoring procedures ; and preparedness for current or future regulatory developments . high ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors , increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products , serve markets , and engage in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings . a downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital .
Question: what was the change in value of cds that were excluded between 2013 and 2014?
Answer: 4.37
Question: what was the percent change?
| 1.748 |
CONVFINQA4479 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis annually , beginning in 2006 , if power market prices drop below the ppa prices . accordingly , because the price is not fixed , the table above does not report power from that plant as sold forward after 2005 . under the ppas with nypa for the output of power from indian point 3 and fitzpatrick , the non-utility nuclear business is obligated to produce at an average capacity factor of 85% ( 85 % ) with a financial true-up payment to nypa should nypa's cost to purchase power due to an output shortfall be higher than the ppas' price . the calculation of any true-up payments is based on two two-year periods . for the first period , which ran through november 20 , 2002 , indian point 3 and fitzpatrick operated at 95% ( 95 % ) and 97% ( 97 % ) , respectively , under the true-up formula . credits of up to 5% ( 5 % ) reflecting period one generation above 85% ( 85 % ) can be used to offset any output shortfalls in the second period , which runs through the end of the ppas on december 31 , 2004 . entergy continually monitors industry trends in order to determine whether asset impairments or other losses could result from a decline in value , or cancellation , of merchant power projects , and records provisions for impairments and losses accordingly . marketing and trading the earnings of entergy's energy commodity services segment are exposed to commodity price market risks primarily through entergy's 50%-owned , unconsolidated investment in entergy-koch . entergy-koch trading ( ekt ) uses value-at-risk models as one measure of the market risk of a loss in fair value for ekt's natural gas and power trading portfolio . actual future gains and losses in portfolios will differ from those estimated based upon actual fluctuations in market rates , operating exposures , and the timing thereof , and changes in the portfolio of derivative financial instruments during the year . to manage its portfolio , ekt enters into various derivative and contractual transactions in accordance with the policy approved by the trading committee of the governing board of entergy-koch . the trading portfolio consists of physical and financial natural gas and power as well as other energy and weather-related contracts . these contracts take many forms , including futures , forwards , swaps , and options . characteristics of ekt's value-at-risk method and the use of that method are as follows : fffd value-at-risk is used in conjunction with stress testing , position reporting , and profit and loss reporting in order to measure and control the risk inherent in the trading and mark-to-market portfolios . fffd ekt estimates its value-at-risk using a model based on j.p . morgan's risk metrics methodology combined with a monte carlo simulation approach . fffd ekt estimates its daily value-at-risk for natural gas and power using a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . ekt's daily value-at-risk is a measure that indicates that , if prices moved against the positions , the loss in neutralizing the portfolio would not be expected to exceed the calculated value-at-risk . fffd ekt seeks to limit the daily value-at-risk on any given day to a certain dollar amount approved by the trading committee . ekt's value-at-risk measures , which it calls daily earnings at risk ( de@r ) , for its trading portfolio were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>de@r at end of period</td><td>$ 15.2 million</td><td>$ 5.5 million</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average de@r for the period</td><td>$ 10.8 million</td><td>$ 6.4 million</td></tr></table> ekt's de@r increased in 2002 compared to 2001 as a result of an increase in the size of the position held and an increase in the volatility of natural gas prices in the latter part of the year . for all derivative and contractual transactions , ekt is exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these transactions . relevant considerations when assessing ekt's credit risk exposure include: .
Question: what was the total of daily earnings at risk at the end of the period in 2002?
| 15.2 |
CONVFINQA4480 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis annually , beginning in 2006 , if power market prices drop below the ppa prices . accordingly , because the price is not fixed , the table above does not report power from that plant as sold forward after 2005 . under the ppas with nypa for the output of power from indian point 3 and fitzpatrick , the non-utility nuclear business is obligated to produce at an average capacity factor of 85% ( 85 % ) with a financial true-up payment to nypa should nypa's cost to purchase power due to an output shortfall be higher than the ppas' price . the calculation of any true-up payments is based on two two-year periods . for the first period , which ran through november 20 , 2002 , indian point 3 and fitzpatrick operated at 95% ( 95 % ) and 97% ( 97 % ) , respectively , under the true-up formula . credits of up to 5% ( 5 % ) reflecting period one generation above 85% ( 85 % ) can be used to offset any output shortfalls in the second period , which runs through the end of the ppas on december 31 , 2004 . entergy continually monitors industry trends in order to determine whether asset impairments or other losses could result from a decline in value , or cancellation , of merchant power projects , and records provisions for impairments and losses accordingly . marketing and trading the earnings of entergy's energy commodity services segment are exposed to commodity price market risks primarily through entergy's 50%-owned , unconsolidated investment in entergy-koch . entergy-koch trading ( ekt ) uses value-at-risk models as one measure of the market risk of a loss in fair value for ekt's natural gas and power trading portfolio . actual future gains and losses in portfolios will differ from those estimated based upon actual fluctuations in market rates , operating exposures , and the timing thereof , and changes in the portfolio of derivative financial instruments during the year . to manage its portfolio , ekt enters into various derivative and contractual transactions in accordance with the policy approved by the trading committee of the governing board of entergy-koch . the trading portfolio consists of physical and financial natural gas and power as well as other energy and weather-related contracts . these contracts take many forms , including futures , forwards , swaps , and options . characteristics of ekt's value-at-risk method and the use of that method are as follows : fffd value-at-risk is used in conjunction with stress testing , position reporting , and profit and loss reporting in order to measure and control the risk inherent in the trading and mark-to-market portfolios . fffd ekt estimates its value-at-risk using a model based on j.p . morgan's risk metrics methodology combined with a monte carlo simulation approach . fffd ekt estimates its daily value-at-risk for natural gas and power using a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . ekt's daily value-at-risk is a measure that indicates that , if prices moved against the positions , the loss in neutralizing the portfolio would not be expected to exceed the calculated value-at-risk . fffd ekt seeks to limit the daily value-at-risk on any given day to a certain dollar amount approved by the trading committee . ekt's value-at-risk measures , which it calls daily earnings at risk ( de@r ) , for its trading portfolio were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>de@r at end of period</td><td>$ 15.2 million</td><td>$ 5.5 million</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average de@r for the period</td><td>$ 10.8 million</td><td>$ 6.4 million</td></tr></table> ekt's de@r increased in 2002 compared to 2001 as a result of an increase in the size of the position held and an increase in the volatility of natural gas prices in the latter part of the year . for all derivative and contractual transactions , ekt is exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these transactions . relevant considerations when assessing ekt's credit risk exposure include: .
Question: what was the total of daily earnings at risk at the end of the period in 2002?
Answer: 15.2
Question: and what was that total in 2001?
| 5.5 |
CONVFINQA4481 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis annually , beginning in 2006 , if power market prices drop below the ppa prices . accordingly , because the price is not fixed , the table above does not report power from that plant as sold forward after 2005 . under the ppas with nypa for the output of power from indian point 3 and fitzpatrick , the non-utility nuclear business is obligated to produce at an average capacity factor of 85% ( 85 % ) with a financial true-up payment to nypa should nypa's cost to purchase power due to an output shortfall be higher than the ppas' price . the calculation of any true-up payments is based on two two-year periods . for the first period , which ran through november 20 , 2002 , indian point 3 and fitzpatrick operated at 95% ( 95 % ) and 97% ( 97 % ) , respectively , under the true-up formula . credits of up to 5% ( 5 % ) reflecting period one generation above 85% ( 85 % ) can be used to offset any output shortfalls in the second period , which runs through the end of the ppas on december 31 , 2004 . entergy continually monitors industry trends in order to determine whether asset impairments or other losses could result from a decline in value , or cancellation , of merchant power projects , and records provisions for impairments and losses accordingly . marketing and trading the earnings of entergy's energy commodity services segment are exposed to commodity price market risks primarily through entergy's 50%-owned , unconsolidated investment in entergy-koch . entergy-koch trading ( ekt ) uses value-at-risk models as one measure of the market risk of a loss in fair value for ekt's natural gas and power trading portfolio . actual future gains and losses in portfolios will differ from those estimated based upon actual fluctuations in market rates , operating exposures , and the timing thereof , and changes in the portfolio of derivative financial instruments during the year . to manage its portfolio , ekt enters into various derivative and contractual transactions in accordance with the policy approved by the trading committee of the governing board of entergy-koch . the trading portfolio consists of physical and financial natural gas and power as well as other energy and weather-related contracts . these contracts take many forms , including futures , forwards , swaps , and options . characteristics of ekt's value-at-risk method and the use of that method are as follows : fffd value-at-risk is used in conjunction with stress testing , position reporting , and profit and loss reporting in order to measure and control the risk inherent in the trading and mark-to-market portfolios . fffd ekt estimates its value-at-risk using a model based on j.p . morgan's risk metrics methodology combined with a monte carlo simulation approach . fffd ekt estimates its daily value-at-risk for natural gas and power using a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . ekt's daily value-at-risk is a measure that indicates that , if prices moved against the positions , the loss in neutralizing the portfolio would not be expected to exceed the calculated value-at-risk . fffd ekt seeks to limit the daily value-at-risk on any given day to a certain dollar amount approved by the trading committee . ekt's value-at-risk measures , which it calls daily earnings at risk ( de@r ) , for its trading portfolio were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>de@r at end of period</td><td>$ 15.2 million</td><td>$ 5.5 million</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average de@r for the period</td><td>$ 10.8 million</td><td>$ 6.4 million</td></tr></table> ekt's de@r increased in 2002 compared to 2001 as a result of an increase in the size of the position held and an increase in the volatility of natural gas prices in the latter part of the year . for all derivative and contractual transactions , ekt is exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these transactions . relevant considerations when assessing ekt's credit risk exposure include: .
Question: what was the total of daily earnings at risk at the end of the period in 2002?
Answer: 15.2
Question: and what was that total in 2001?
Answer: 5.5
Question: what was, then, the change in this total over the year?
| 9.7 |
CONVFINQA4482 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis annually , beginning in 2006 , if power market prices drop below the ppa prices . accordingly , because the price is not fixed , the table above does not report power from that plant as sold forward after 2005 . under the ppas with nypa for the output of power from indian point 3 and fitzpatrick , the non-utility nuclear business is obligated to produce at an average capacity factor of 85% ( 85 % ) with a financial true-up payment to nypa should nypa's cost to purchase power due to an output shortfall be higher than the ppas' price . the calculation of any true-up payments is based on two two-year periods . for the first period , which ran through november 20 , 2002 , indian point 3 and fitzpatrick operated at 95% ( 95 % ) and 97% ( 97 % ) , respectively , under the true-up formula . credits of up to 5% ( 5 % ) reflecting period one generation above 85% ( 85 % ) can be used to offset any output shortfalls in the second period , which runs through the end of the ppas on december 31 , 2004 . entergy continually monitors industry trends in order to determine whether asset impairments or other losses could result from a decline in value , or cancellation , of merchant power projects , and records provisions for impairments and losses accordingly . marketing and trading the earnings of entergy's energy commodity services segment are exposed to commodity price market risks primarily through entergy's 50%-owned , unconsolidated investment in entergy-koch . entergy-koch trading ( ekt ) uses value-at-risk models as one measure of the market risk of a loss in fair value for ekt's natural gas and power trading portfolio . actual future gains and losses in portfolios will differ from those estimated based upon actual fluctuations in market rates , operating exposures , and the timing thereof , and changes in the portfolio of derivative financial instruments during the year . to manage its portfolio , ekt enters into various derivative and contractual transactions in accordance with the policy approved by the trading committee of the governing board of entergy-koch . the trading portfolio consists of physical and financial natural gas and power as well as other energy and weather-related contracts . these contracts take many forms , including futures , forwards , swaps , and options . characteristics of ekt's value-at-risk method and the use of that method are as follows : fffd value-at-risk is used in conjunction with stress testing , position reporting , and profit and loss reporting in order to measure and control the risk inherent in the trading and mark-to-market portfolios . fffd ekt estimates its value-at-risk using a model based on j.p . morgan's risk metrics methodology combined with a monte carlo simulation approach . fffd ekt estimates its daily value-at-risk for natural gas and power using a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . ekt's daily value-at-risk is a measure that indicates that , if prices moved against the positions , the loss in neutralizing the portfolio would not be expected to exceed the calculated value-at-risk . fffd ekt seeks to limit the daily value-at-risk on any given day to a certain dollar amount approved by the trading committee . ekt's value-at-risk measures , which it calls daily earnings at risk ( de@r ) , for its trading portfolio were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>de@r at end of period</td><td>$ 15.2 million</td><td>$ 5.5 million</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average de@r for the period</td><td>$ 10.8 million</td><td>$ 6.4 million</td></tr></table> ekt's de@r increased in 2002 compared to 2001 as a result of an increase in the size of the position held and an increase in the volatility of natural gas prices in the latter part of the year . for all derivative and contractual transactions , ekt is exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these transactions . relevant considerations when assessing ekt's credit risk exposure include: .
Question: what was the total of daily earnings at risk at the end of the period in 2002?
Answer: 15.2
Question: and what was that total in 2001?
Answer: 5.5
Question: what was, then, the change in this total over the year?
Answer: 9.7
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2001 total of daily earnings, in percentage?
| 1.76364 |
CONVFINQA4483 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
we maintain and operate the assets based on contractual obligations within the lease arrangements , which set specific guidelines consistent within the railroad industry . as such , we have no control over activities that could materially impact the fair value of the leased assets . we do not hold the power to direct the activities of the vies and , therefore , do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the vies . additionally , we do not have the obligation to absorb losses of the vies or the right to receive benefits of the vies that could potentially be significant to the we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these vies because our actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the vie 2019s performance and our fixed-price purchase options are not considered to be potentially significant to the vies . the future minimum lease payments associated with the vie leases totaled $ 2.6 billion as of december 31 , 2015 . 17 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 included $ 2273 million , net of $ 1189 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2454 million , net of $ 1210 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2015 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 491</td><td>$ 217</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2017</td><td>446</td><td>220</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2018</td><td>371</td><td>198</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2019</td><td>339</td><td>184</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2020</td><td>282</td><td>193</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>1501</td><td>575</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 3430</td><td>$ 1587</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-319 ( 319 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum lease payments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1268</td></tr></table> approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 590 million in 2015 , $ 593 million in 2014 , and $ 618 million in 2013 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 18 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . to the extent possible , we have recorded a liability where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments . approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and .
Question: what is the sum of total minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases?
| 5017.0 |
CONVFINQA4484 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
we maintain and operate the assets based on contractual obligations within the lease arrangements , which set specific guidelines consistent within the railroad industry . as such , we have no control over activities that could materially impact the fair value of the leased assets . we do not hold the power to direct the activities of the vies and , therefore , do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the vies . additionally , we do not have the obligation to absorb losses of the vies or the right to receive benefits of the vies that could potentially be significant to the we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these vies because our actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the vie 2019s performance and our fixed-price purchase options are not considered to be potentially significant to the vies . the future minimum lease payments associated with the vie leases totaled $ 2.6 billion as of december 31 , 2015 . 17 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 included $ 2273 million , net of $ 1189 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2454 million , net of $ 1210 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2015 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 491</td><td>$ 217</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2017</td><td>446</td><td>220</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2018</td><td>371</td><td>198</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2019</td><td>339</td><td>184</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2020</td><td>282</td><td>193</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>1501</td><td>575</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 3430</td><td>$ 1587</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-319 ( 319 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum lease payments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1268</td></tr></table> approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 590 million in 2015 , $ 593 million in 2014 , and $ 618 million in 2013 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 18 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . to the extent possible , we have recorded a liability where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments . approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and .
Question: what is the sum of total minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases?
Answer: 5017.0
Question: what is the value of operating leases?
| 3430.0 |
CONVFINQA4485 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
we maintain and operate the assets based on contractual obligations within the lease arrangements , which set specific guidelines consistent within the railroad industry . as such , we have no control over activities that could materially impact the fair value of the leased assets . we do not hold the power to direct the activities of the vies and , therefore , do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the vies . additionally , we do not have the obligation to absorb losses of the vies or the right to receive benefits of the vies that could potentially be significant to the we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these vies because our actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the vie 2019s performance and our fixed-price purchase options are not considered to be potentially significant to the vies . the future minimum lease payments associated with the vie leases totaled $ 2.6 billion as of december 31 , 2015 . 17 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 included $ 2273 million , net of $ 1189 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2454 million , net of $ 1210 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2015 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 491</td><td>$ 217</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2017</td><td>446</td><td>220</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2018</td><td>371</td><td>198</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2019</td><td>339</td><td>184</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2020</td><td>282</td><td>193</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>1501</td><td>575</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 3430</td><td>$ 1587</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-319 ( 319 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum lease payments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1268</td></tr></table> approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 590 million in 2015 , $ 593 million in 2014 , and $ 618 million in 2013 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 18 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . to the extent possible , we have recorded a liability where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments . approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and .
Question: what is the sum of total minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases?
Answer: 5017.0
Question: what is the value of operating leases?
Answer: 3430.0
Question: what is the value of operating leases over the total minimum payments?
| 0.68368 |
CONVFINQA4486 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 1110.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>26.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>13.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>summer capacity charges</td><td>5.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>price applied to unbilled sales</td><td>4.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>fuel recovery revenues</td><td>-14.2 ( 14.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2004 net revenue</td><td>$ 1149.8</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance resulted primarily from an increase of 1179 gwh in electricity usage in the industrial sector . billed usage also increased a total of 291 gwh in the residential , commercial , and governmental sectors . the increase in net wholesale revenue is primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co-op customers . summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these capacity charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 . the price applied to unbilled sales variance resulted primarily from an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales . fuel recovery revenues represent an under-recovery of fuel charges that are recovered in base rates . entergy gulf states recorded $ 22.6 million of provisions in 2004 for potential rate refunds . these provisions are not included in the net revenue table above because they are more than offset by provisions recorded in 2003 . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 187.8 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions . the increases in volume/weather and wholesale revenue , discussed above , also contributed to the increase . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 increased recovery of deferred fuel costs due to higher fuel rates ; 2022 increases in the market prices of natural gas , coal , and purchased power ; and 2022 an increase in electricity usage , discussed above . other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy gulf states' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .
Question: what was 2004 net revenue?
| 1149.8 |
CONVFINQA4487 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 1110.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>26.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>13.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>summer capacity charges</td><td>5.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>price applied to unbilled sales</td><td>4.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>fuel recovery revenues</td><td>-14.2 ( 14.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2004 net revenue</td><td>$ 1149.8</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance resulted primarily from an increase of 1179 gwh in electricity usage in the industrial sector . billed usage also increased a total of 291 gwh in the residential , commercial , and governmental sectors . the increase in net wholesale revenue is primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co-op customers . summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these capacity charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 . the price applied to unbilled sales variance resulted primarily from an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales . fuel recovery revenues represent an under-recovery of fuel charges that are recovered in base rates . entergy gulf states recorded $ 22.6 million of provisions in 2004 for potential rate refunds . these provisions are not included in the net revenue table above because they are more than offset by provisions recorded in 2003 . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 187.8 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions . the increases in volume/weather and wholesale revenue , discussed above , also contributed to the increase . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 increased recovery of deferred fuel costs due to higher fuel rates ; 2022 increases in the market prices of natural gas , coal , and purchased power ; and 2022 an increase in electricity usage , discussed above . other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy gulf states' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .
Question: what was 2004 net revenue?
Answer: 1149.8
Question: what was net revenue in 2003?
| 1110.1 |
CONVFINQA4488 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 1110.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>26.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>13.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>summer capacity charges</td><td>5.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>price applied to unbilled sales</td><td>4.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>fuel recovery revenues</td><td>-14.2 ( 14.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2004 net revenue</td><td>$ 1149.8</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance resulted primarily from an increase of 1179 gwh in electricity usage in the industrial sector . billed usage also increased a total of 291 gwh in the residential , commercial , and governmental sectors . the increase in net wholesale revenue is primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co-op customers . summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these capacity charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 . the price applied to unbilled sales variance resulted primarily from an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales . fuel recovery revenues represent an under-recovery of fuel charges that are recovered in base rates . entergy gulf states recorded $ 22.6 million of provisions in 2004 for potential rate refunds . these provisions are not included in the net revenue table above because they are more than offset by provisions recorded in 2003 . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 187.8 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions . the increases in volume/weather and wholesale revenue , discussed above , also contributed to the increase . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 increased recovery of deferred fuel costs due to higher fuel rates ; 2022 increases in the market prices of natural gas , coal , and purchased power ; and 2022 an increase in electricity usage , discussed above . other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy gulf states' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .
Question: what was 2004 net revenue?
Answer: 1149.8
Question: what was net revenue in 2003?
Answer: 1110.1
Question: what is the net change in revenue?
| 39.7 |
CONVFINQA4489 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 1110.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>26.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>13.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>summer capacity charges</td><td>5.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>price applied to unbilled sales</td><td>4.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>fuel recovery revenues</td><td>-14.2 ( 14.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2004 net revenue</td><td>$ 1149.8</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance resulted primarily from an increase of 1179 gwh in electricity usage in the industrial sector . billed usage also increased a total of 291 gwh in the residential , commercial , and governmental sectors . the increase in net wholesale revenue is primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co-op customers . summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these capacity charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 . the price applied to unbilled sales variance resulted primarily from an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales . fuel recovery revenues represent an under-recovery of fuel charges that are recovered in base rates . entergy gulf states recorded $ 22.6 million of provisions in 2004 for potential rate refunds . these provisions are not included in the net revenue table above because they are more than offset by provisions recorded in 2003 . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 187.8 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions . the increases in volume/weather and wholesale revenue , discussed above , also contributed to the increase . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 increased recovery of deferred fuel costs due to higher fuel rates ; 2022 increases in the market prices of natural gas , coal , and purchased power ; and 2022 an increase in electricity usage , discussed above . other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy gulf states' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .
Question: what was 2004 net revenue?
Answer: 1149.8
Question: what was net revenue in 2003?
Answer: 1110.1
Question: what is the net change in revenue?
Answer: 39.7
Question: what is the value of volume/weather divided by the revenue change?
| 0.67254 |
CONVFINQA4490 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
. <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/07</td><td>12/08</td><td>12/09</td><td>12/10</td><td>12/11</td><td>12/12</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fidelity national information services inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>70.08</td><td>101.93</td><td>120.01</td><td>117.34</td><td>157.38</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>63.00</td><td>79.67</td><td>91.67</td><td>93.61</td><td>108.59</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services</td><td>100.00</td><td>68.26</td><td>99.41</td><td>97.33</td><td>118.68</td><td>151.90</td></tr></table> s&p supercap data processing & outsourced 100.00 68.26 99.41 97.33 118.68 151.90 item 6 . selected financial data . the selected financial data set forth below constitutes historical financial data of fis and should be read in conjunction with item 7 , management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , and item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , included elsewhere in this report . on october 1 , 2009 , we completed the acquisition of metavante technologies , inc . ( "metavante" ) . the results of operations and financial position of metavante are included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition . on july 2 , 2008 , we completed the spin-off of lender processing services , inc. , which was a former wholly-owned subsidiary ( "lps" ) . for accounting purposes , the results of lps are presented as discontinued operations . accordingly , all prior periods have been restated to present the results of fis on a stand alone basis and include the results of lps up to july 2 , 2008 , as discontinued operations. .
Question: what is the value of fidelity national in 2008?
| 70.08 |
CONVFINQA4491 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
. <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/07</td><td>12/08</td><td>12/09</td><td>12/10</td><td>12/11</td><td>12/12</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fidelity national information services inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>70.08</td><td>101.93</td><td>120.01</td><td>117.34</td><td>157.38</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>63.00</td><td>79.67</td><td>91.67</td><td>93.61</td><td>108.59</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services</td><td>100.00</td><td>68.26</td><td>99.41</td><td>97.33</td><td>118.68</td><td>151.90</td></tr></table> s&p supercap data processing & outsourced 100.00 68.26 99.41 97.33 118.68 151.90 item 6 . selected financial data . the selected financial data set forth below constitutes historical financial data of fis and should be read in conjunction with item 7 , management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , and item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , included elsewhere in this report . on october 1 , 2009 , we completed the acquisition of metavante technologies , inc . ( "metavante" ) . the results of operations and financial position of metavante are included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition . on july 2 , 2008 , we completed the spin-off of lender processing services , inc. , which was a former wholly-owned subsidiary ( "lps" ) . for accounting purposes , the results of lps are presented as discontinued operations . accordingly , all prior periods have been restated to present the results of fis on a stand alone basis and include the results of lps up to july 2 , 2008 , as discontinued operations. .
Question: what is the value of fidelity national in 2008?
Answer: 70.08
Question: what is the value of fidelity in 2008 less an assumed $100 initial investment?
| -29.92 |
CONVFINQA4492 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
. <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/07</td><td>12/08</td><td>12/09</td><td>12/10</td><td>12/11</td><td>12/12</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fidelity national information services inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>70.08</td><td>101.93</td><td>120.01</td><td>117.34</td><td>157.38</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>63.00</td><td>79.67</td><td>91.67</td><td>93.61</td><td>108.59</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services</td><td>100.00</td><td>68.26</td><td>99.41</td><td>97.33</td><td>118.68</td><td>151.90</td></tr></table> s&p supercap data processing & outsourced 100.00 68.26 99.41 97.33 118.68 151.90 item 6 . selected financial data . the selected financial data set forth below constitutes historical financial data of fis and should be read in conjunction with item 7 , management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , and item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , included elsewhere in this report . on october 1 , 2009 , we completed the acquisition of metavante technologies , inc . ( "metavante" ) . the results of operations and financial position of metavante are included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition . on july 2 , 2008 , we completed the spin-off of lender processing services , inc. , which was a former wholly-owned subsidiary ( "lps" ) . for accounting purposes , the results of lps are presented as discontinued operations . accordingly , all prior periods have been restated to present the results of fis on a stand alone basis and include the results of lps up to july 2 , 2008 , as discontinued operations. .
Question: what is the value of fidelity national in 2008?
Answer: 70.08
Question: what is the value of fidelity in 2008 less an assumed $100 initial investment?
Answer: -29.92
Question: what is the percent change?
| -0.2992 |
CONVFINQA4493 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
us in a position to handle demand changes . we will also continue utilizing industrial engineering techniques to improve productivity . 2022 fuel prices 2013 uncertainty about the economy makes fuel price projections difficult , and we could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors . to reduce the impact of fuel price on earnings , we will continue to seek recovery from our customers through our fuel surcharge programs and to expand our fuel conservation efforts . 2022 capital plan 2013 in 2011 , we plan to make total capital investments of approximately $ 3.2 billion , including expenditures for positive train control ( ptc ) , which may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . ( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) 2022 positive train control 2013 in response to a legislative mandate to implement ptc by the end of 2015 , we expect to spend approximately $ 250 million during 2011 on developing ptc . we currently estimate that ptc will cost us approximately $ 1.4 billion to implement by the end of 2015 , in accordance with rules issued by the federal railroad administration ( fra ) . this includes costs for installing the new system along our tracks , upgrading locomotives to work with the new system , and adding digital data communication equipment so all the parts of the system can communicate with each other . during 2011 , we plan to begin testing the technology to evaluate its effectiveness . 2022 financial expectations 2013 we remain cautious about economic conditions , but anticipate volume to increase from 2010 levels . in addition , we expect volume , price , and productivity gains to offset expected higher costs for fuel , labor inflation , depreciation , casualty costs , and property taxes to drive operating ratio improvement . results of operations operating revenues millions 2010 2009 2008 % ( % ) change 2010 v 2009 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2010 v 2009</td><td>% ( % ) change 2009 v 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>freight revenues</td><td>$ 16069</td><td>$ 13373</td><td>$ 17118</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td><td>( 22 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other revenues</td><td>896</td><td>770</td><td>852</td><td>16</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 16965</td><td>$ 14143</td><td>$ 17970</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td><td>( 21 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> freight revenues are revenues generated by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups . freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) . changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc . we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as a reduction to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments . we recognize freight revenues as freight moves from origin to destination . we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them . other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage . we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations . freight revenues and volume levels for all six commodity groups increased during 2010 as a result of economic improvement in many market sectors . we experienced particularly strong volume growth in automotive , intermodal , and industrial products shipments . core pricing gains and higher fuel surcharges also increased freight revenues and drove a 6% ( 6 % ) improvement in arc . freight revenues and volume levels for all six commodity groups decreased during 2009 , reflecting continued economic weakness . we experienced the largest volume declines in automotive and industrial .
Question: what was operating revenue in 2010?
| 16965.0 |
CONVFINQA4494 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
us in a position to handle demand changes . we will also continue utilizing industrial engineering techniques to improve productivity . 2022 fuel prices 2013 uncertainty about the economy makes fuel price projections difficult , and we could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors . to reduce the impact of fuel price on earnings , we will continue to seek recovery from our customers through our fuel surcharge programs and to expand our fuel conservation efforts . 2022 capital plan 2013 in 2011 , we plan to make total capital investments of approximately $ 3.2 billion , including expenditures for positive train control ( ptc ) , which may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . ( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) 2022 positive train control 2013 in response to a legislative mandate to implement ptc by the end of 2015 , we expect to spend approximately $ 250 million during 2011 on developing ptc . we currently estimate that ptc will cost us approximately $ 1.4 billion to implement by the end of 2015 , in accordance with rules issued by the federal railroad administration ( fra ) . this includes costs for installing the new system along our tracks , upgrading locomotives to work with the new system , and adding digital data communication equipment so all the parts of the system can communicate with each other . during 2011 , we plan to begin testing the technology to evaluate its effectiveness . 2022 financial expectations 2013 we remain cautious about economic conditions , but anticipate volume to increase from 2010 levels . in addition , we expect volume , price , and productivity gains to offset expected higher costs for fuel , labor inflation , depreciation , casualty costs , and property taxes to drive operating ratio improvement . results of operations operating revenues millions 2010 2009 2008 % ( % ) change 2010 v 2009 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2010 v 2009</td><td>% ( % ) change 2009 v 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>freight revenues</td><td>$ 16069</td><td>$ 13373</td><td>$ 17118</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td><td>( 22 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other revenues</td><td>896</td><td>770</td><td>852</td><td>16</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 16965</td><td>$ 14143</td><td>$ 17970</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td><td>( 21 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> freight revenues are revenues generated by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups . freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) . changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc . we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as a reduction to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments . we recognize freight revenues as freight moves from origin to destination . we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them . other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage . we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations . freight revenues and volume levels for all six commodity groups increased during 2010 as a result of economic improvement in many market sectors . we experienced particularly strong volume growth in automotive , intermodal , and industrial products shipments . core pricing gains and higher fuel surcharges also increased freight revenues and drove a 6% ( 6 % ) improvement in arc . freight revenues and volume levels for all six commodity groups decreased during 2009 , reflecting continued economic weakness . we experienced the largest volume declines in automotive and industrial .
Question: what was operating revenue in 2010?
Answer: 16965.0
Question: what was it in 2009?
| 14143.0 |
CONVFINQA4495 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
us in a position to handle demand changes . we will also continue utilizing industrial engineering techniques to improve productivity . 2022 fuel prices 2013 uncertainty about the economy makes fuel price projections difficult , and we could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors . to reduce the impact of fuel price on earnings , we will continue to seek recovery from our customers through our fuel surcharge programs and to expand our fuel conservation efforts . 2022 capital plan 2013 in 2011 , we plan to make total capital investments of approximately $ 3.2 billion , including expenditures for positive train control ( ptc ) , which may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . ( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) 2022 positive train control 2013 in response to a legislative mandate to implement ptc by the end of 2015 , we expect to spend approximately $ 250 million during 2011 on developing ptc . we currently estimate that ptc will cost us approximately $ 1.4 billion to implement by the end of 2015 , in accordance with rules issued by the federal railroad administration ( fra ) . this includes costs for installing the new system along our tracks , upgrading locomotives to work with the new system , and adding digital data communication equipment so all the parts of the system can communicate with each other . during 2011 , we plan to begin testing the technology to evaluate its effectiveness . 2022 financial expectations 2013 we remain cautious about economic conditions , but anticipate volume to increase from 2010 levels . in addition , we expect volume , price , and productivity gains to offset expected higher costs for fuel , labor inflation , depreciation , casualty costs , and property taxes to drive operating ratio improvement . results of operations operating revenues millions 2010 2009 2008 % ( % ) change 2010 v 2009 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2010 v 2009</td><td>% ( % ) change 2009 v 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>freight revenues</td><td>$ 16069</td><td>$ 13373</td><td>$ 17118</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td><td>( 22 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other revenues</td><td>896</td><td>770</td><td>852</td><td>16</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 16965</td><td>$ 14143</td><td>$ 17970</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td><td>( 21 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> freight revenues are revenues generated by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups . freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) . changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc . we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as a reduction to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments . we recognize freight revenues as freight moves from origin to destination . we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them . other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage . we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations . freight revenues and volume levels for all six commodity groups increased during 2010 as a result of economic improvement in many market sectors . we experienced particularly strong volume growth in automotive , intermodal , and industrial products shipments . core pricing gains and higher fuel surcharges also increased freight revenues and drove a 6% ( 6 % ) improvement in arc . freight revenues and volume levels for all six commodity groups decreased during 2009 , reflecting continued economic weakness . we experienced the largest volume declines in automotive and industrial .
Question: what was operating revenue in 2010?
Answer: 16965.0
Question: what was it in 2009?
Answer: 14143.0
Question: what is the sum?
| 31108.0 |
CONVFINQA4496 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
us in a position to handle demand changes . we will also continue utilizing industrial engineering techniques to improve productivity . 2022 fuel prices 2013 uncertainty about the economy makes fuel price projections difficult , and we could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors . to reduce the impact of fuel price on earnings , we will continue to seek recovery from our customers through our fuel surcharge programs and to expand our fuel conservation efforts . 2022 capital plan 2013 in 2011 , we plan to make total capital investments of approximately $ 3.2 billion , including expenditures for positive train control ( ptc ) , which may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . ( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) 2022 positive train control 2013 in response to a legislative mandate to implement ptc by the end of 2015 , we expect to spend approximately $ 250 million during 2011 on developing ptc . we currently estimate that ptc will cost us approximately $ 1.4 billion to implement by the end of 2015 , in accordance with rules issued by the federal railroad administration ( fra ) . this includes costs for installing the new system along our tracks , upgrading locomotives to work with the new system , and adding digital data communication equipment so all the parts of the system can communicate with each other . during 2011 , we plan to begin testing the technology to evaluate its effectiveness . 2022 financial expectations 2013 we remain cautious about economic conditions , but anticipate volume to increase from 2010 levels . in addition , we expect volume , price , and productivity gains to offset expected higher costs for fuel , labor inflation , depreciation , casualty costs , and property taxes to drive operating ratio improvement . results of operations operating revenues millions 2010 2009 2008 % ( % ) change 2010 v 2009 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2010 v 2009</td><td>% ( % ) change 2009 v 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>freight revenues</td><td>$ 16069</td><td>$ 13373</td><td>$ 17118</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td><td>( 22 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other revenues</td><td>896</td><td>770</td><td>852</td><td>16</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 16965</td><td>$ 14143</td><td>$ 17970</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td><td>( 21 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> freight revenues are revenues generated by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups . freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) . changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc . we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as a reduction to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments . we recognize freight revenues as freight moves from origin to destination . we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them . other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage . we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations . freight revenues and volume levels for all six commodity groups increased during 2010 as a result of economic improvement in many market sectors . we experienced particularly strong volume growth in automotive , intermodal , and industrial products shipments . core pricing gains and higher fuel surcharges also increased freight revenues and drove a 6% ( 6 % ) improvement in arc . freight revenues and volume levels for all six commodity groups decreased during 2009 , reflecting continued economic weakness . we experienced the largest volume declines in automotive and industrial .
Question: what was operating revenue in 2010?
Answer: 16965.0
Question: what was it in 2009?
Answer: 14143.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 31108.0
Question: what were operating revenues in 2008?
| 17970.0 |
CONVFINQA4497 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
us in a position to handle demand changes . we will also continue utilizing industrial engineering techniques to improve productivity . 2022 fuel prices 2013 uncertainty about the economy makes fuel price projections difficult , and we could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors . to reduce the impact of fuel price on earnings , we will continue to seek recovery from our customers through our fuel surcharge programs and to expand our fuel conservation efforts . 2022 capital plan 2013 in 2011 , we plan to make total capital investments of approximately $ 3.2 billion , including expenditures for positive train control ( ptc ) , which may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . ( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) 2022 positive train control 2013 in response to a legislative mandate to implement ptc by the end of 2015 , we expect to spend approximately $ 250 million during 2011 on developing ptc . we currently estimate that ptc will cost us approximately $ 1.4 billion to implement by the end of 2015 , in accordance with rules issued by the federal railroad administration ( fra ) . this includes costs for installing the new system along our tracks , upgrading locomotives to work with the new system , and adding digital data communication equipment so all the parts of the system can communicate with each other . during 2011 , we plan to begin testing the technology to evaluate its effectiveness . 2022 financial expectations 2013 we remain cautious about economic conditions , but anticipate volume to increase from 2010 levels . in addition , we expect volume , price , and productivity gains to offset expected higher costs for fuel , labor inflation , depreciation , casualty costs , and property taxes to drive operating ratio improvement . results of operations operating revenues millions 2010 2009 2008 % ( % ) change 2010 v 2009 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2010 v 2009</td><td>% ( % ) change 2009 v 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>freight revenues</td><td>$ 16069</td><td>$ 13373</td><td>$ 17118</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td><td>( 22 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other revenues</td><td>896</td><td>770</td><td>852</td><td>16</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 16965</td><td>$ 14143</td><td>$ 17970</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td><td>( 21 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> freight revenues are revenues generated by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups . freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) . changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc . we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as a reduction to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments . we recognize freight revenues as freight moves from origin to destination . we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them . other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage . we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations . freight revenues and volume levels for all six commodity groups increased during 2010 as a result of economic improvement in many market sectors . we experienced particularly strong volume growth in automotive , intermodal , and industrial products shipments . core pricing gains and higher fuel surcharges also increased freight revenues and drove a 6% ( 6 % ) improvement in arc . freight revenues and volume levels for all six commodity groups decreased during 2009 , reflecting continued economic weakness . we experienced the largest volume declines in automotive and industrial .
Question: what was operating revenue in 2010?
Answer: 16965.0
Question: what was it in 2009?
Answer: 14143.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 31108.0
Question: what were operating revenues in 2008?
Answer: 17970.0
Question: what is the total sum?
| 49078.0 |
CONVFINQA4498 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
us in a position to handle demand changes . we will also continue utilizing industrial engineering techniques to improve productivity . 2022 fuel prices 2013 uncertainty about the economy makes fuel price projections difficult , and we could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors . to reduce the impact of fuel price on earnings , we will continue to seek recovery from our customers through our fuel surcharge programs and to expand our fuel conservation efforts . 2022 capital plan 2013 in 2011 , we plan to make total capital investments of approximately $ 3.2 billion , including expenditures for positive train control ( ptc ) , which may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . ( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) 2022 positive train control 2013 in response to a legislative mandate to implement ptc by the end of 2015 , we expect to spend approximately $ 250 million during 2011 on developing ptc . we currently estimate that ptc will cost us approximately $ 1.4 billion to implement by the end of 2015 , in accordance with rules issued by the federal railroad administration ( fra ) . this includes costs for installing the new system along our tracks , upgrading locomotives to work with the new system , and adding digital data communication equipment so all the parts of the system can communicate with each other . during 2011 , we plan to begin testing the technology to evaluate its effectiveness . 2022 financial expectations 2013 we remain cautious about economic conditions , but anticipate volume to increase from 2010 levels . in addition , we expect volume , price , and productivity gains to offset expected higher costs for fuel , labor inflation , depreciation , casualty costs , and property taxes to drive operating ratio improvement . results of operations operating revenues millions 2010 2009 2008 % ( % ) change 2010 v 2009 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2010 v 2009</td><td>% ( % ) change 2009 v 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>freight revenues</td><td>$ 16069</td><td>$ 13373</td><td>$ 17118</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td><td>( 22 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other revenues</td><td>896</td><td>770</td><td>852</td><td>16</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 16965</td><td>$ 14143</td><td>$ 17970</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td><td>( 21 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> freight revenues are revenues generated by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups . freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) . changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc . we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as a reduction to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments . we recognize freight revenues as freight moves from origin to destination . we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them . other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage . we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations . freight revenues and volume levels for all six commodity groups increased during 2010 as a result of economic improvement in many market sectors . we experienced particularly strong volume growth in automotive , intermodal , and industrial products shipments . core pricing gains and higher fuel surcharges also increased freight revenues and drove a 6% ( 6 % ) improvement in arc . freight revenues and volume levels for all six commodity groups decreased during 2009 , reflecting continued economic weakness . we experienced the largest volume declines in automotive and industrial .
Question: what was operating revenue in 2010?
Answer: 16965.0
Question: what was it in 2009?
Answer: 14143.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 31108.0
Question: what were operating revenues in 2008?
Answer: 17970.0
Question: what is the total sum?
Answer: 49078.0
Question: what is the average per year?
| 16359.33333 |
CONVFINQA4499 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements stock-based performance unit awards 2013 during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 we granted 754140 , 563631 and 1205517 stock- based performance unit awards to officers . at december 31 , 2018 , there were 1196176 units outstanding . total stock-based performance unit awards expense was $ 13 million in 2018 , $ 8 million in 2017 and $ 6 million in 2016 . the key assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation to determine the fair value of stock-based performance units granted in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>valuation date stock price</td><td>$ 14.17</td><td>$ 14.17</td><td>$ 14.17</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected annual dividend yield</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>39% ( 39 % )</td><td>43% ( 43 % )</td><td>52% ( 52 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.5% ( 2.5 % )</td><td>2.6% ( 2.6 % )</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value of stock-based performance units outstanding</td><td>$ 19.60</td><td>$ 19.45</td><td>$ 21.51</td></tr></table> 18 . defined benefit postretirement plans and defined contribution plan we have noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all domestic employees , as well as u.k . employees who were hired before april 2010 . certain employees located in e.g. , who are u.s . or u.k . based , also participate in these plans . benefits under these plans are based on plan provisions specific to each plan . for the u.k . pension plan , the principal employer and plan trustees reached a decision to close the plan to future benefit accruals effective december 31 , 2015 . we also have defined benefit plans for other postretirement benefits covering our u.s . employees . health care benefits are provided up to age 65 through comprehensive hospital , surgical and major medical benefit provisions subject to various cost- sharing features . post-age 65 health care benefits are provided to certain u.s . employees on a defined contribution basis . life insurance benefits are provided to certain retiree beneficiaries . these other postretirement benefits are not funded in advance . employees hired after 2016 are not eligible for any postretirement health care or life insurance benefits. .
Question: what was the fair value of stock-based performance units outstanding in 2018?
| 19.6 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.