id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA5100 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) other debentures and notes following are descriptions of the various other debentures and notes outstanding at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , as listed in the table presented at the beginning of this note . geosouthern debt in december 2013 , in conjunction with the planned geosouthern acquisition , devon issued $ 2.25 billion aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate senior notes resulting in cash proceeds of approximately $ 2.2 billion , net of discounts and issuance costs . the floating rate senior notes due in 2015 bear interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.45 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the floating rate senior notes due in 2016 bears interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.54 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the schedule below summarizes the key terms of these notes ( in millions ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>floating rate due december 15 2015</td><td>$ 500</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>floating rate due december 15 2016</td><td>350</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1.20% ( 1.20 % ) due december 15 2016 ( 1 )</td><td>650</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2.25% ( 2.25 % ) due december 15 2018</td><td>750</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>discount and issuance costs</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net proceeds</td><td>$ 2248</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the 1.20% ( 1.20 % ) $ 650 million note due december 15 , 2016 was redeemed on november 13 , 2014 . the senior notes were classified as short-term debt on devon 2019s consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2013 due to certain redemption features in the event that the geosouthern acquisition was not completed on or prior to june 30 , 2014 . on february 28 , 2014 , the geosouthern acquisition closed and thus the senior notes were subsequently classified as long-term debt . additionally , during december 2013 , devon entered into a term loan agreement with a group of major financial institutions pursuant to which devon could draw up to $ 2.0 billion to finance , in part , the geosouthern acquisition and to pay transaction costs . in february 2014 , devon drew the $ 2.0 billion of term loans for the geosouthern transaction , and the amount was subsequently repaid on june 30 , 2014 with the canadian divestiture proceeds that were repatriated to the u.s . in june 2014 , at which point the term loan was terminated. .
Question: what was the combined floating rate due for 2015 and 2016?
Answer: 850.0
Question: so what portion of the net proceeds came from the floating rates during these years?
| 0.37811 |
CONVFINQA5101 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) other debentures and notes following are descriptions of the various other debentures and notes outstanding at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , as listed in the table presented at the beginning of this note . geosouthern debt in december 2013 , in conjunction with the planned geosouthern acquisition , devon issued $ 2.25 billion aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate senior notes resulting in cash proceeds of approximately $ 2.2 billion , net of discounts and issuance costs . the floating rate senior notes due in 2015 bear interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.45 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the floating rate senior notes due in 2016 bears interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.54 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the schedule below summarizes the key terms of these notes ( in millions ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>floating rate due december 15 2015</td><td>$ 500</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>floating rate due december 15 2016</td><td>350</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1.20% ( 1.20 % ) due december 15 2016 ( 1 )</td><td>650</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2.25% ( 2.25 % ) due december 15 2018</td><td>750</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>discount and issuance costs</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net proceeds</td><td>$ 2248</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the 1.20% ( 1.20 % ) $ 650 million note due december 15 , 2016 was redeemed on november 13 , 2014 . the senior notes were classified as short-term debt on devon 2019s consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2013 due to certain redemption features in the event that the geosouthern acquisition was not completed on or prior to june 30 , 2014 . on february 28 , 2014 , the geosouthern acquisition closed and thus the senior notes were subsequently classified as long-term debt . additionally , during december 2013 , devon entered into a term loan agreement with a group of major financial institutions pursuant to which devon could draw up to $ 2.0 billion to finance , in part , the geosouthern acquisition and to pay transaction costs . in february 2014 , devon drew the $ 2.0 billion of term loans for the geosouthern transaction , and the amount was subsequently repaid on june 30 , 2014 with the canadian divestiture proceeds that were repatriated to the u.s . in june 2014 , at which point the term loan was terminated. .
Question: what was the combined floating rate due for 2015 and 2016?
Answer: 850.0
Question: so what portion of the net proceeds came from the floating rates during these years?
Answer: 0.37811
Question: and as a percentage?
| 37.81139 |
CONVFINQA5102 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) other debentures and notes following are descriptions of the various other debentures and notes outstanding at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , as listed in the table presented at the beginning of this note . geosouthern debt in december 2013 , in conjunction with the planned geosouthern acquisition , devon issued $ 2.25 billion aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate senior notes resulting in cash proceeds of approximately $ 2.2 billion , net of discounts and issuance costs . the floating rate senior notes due in 2015 bear interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.45 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the floating rate senior notes due in 2016 bears interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.54 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the schedule below summarizes the key terms of these notes ( in millions ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>floating rate due december 15 2015</td><td>$ 500</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>floating rate due december 15 2016</td><td>350</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1.20% ( 1.20 % ) due december 15 2016 ( 1 )</td><td>650</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2.25% ( 2.25 % ) due december 15 2018</td><td>750</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>discount and issuance costs</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net proceeds</td><td>$ 2248</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the 1.20% ( 1.20 % ) $ 650 million note due december 15 , 2016 was redeemed on november 13 , 2014 . the senior notes were classified as short-term debt on devon 2019s consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2013 due to certain redemption features in the event that the geosouthern acquisition was not completed on or prior to june 30 , 2014 . on february 28 , 2014 , the geosouthern acquisition closed and thus the senior notes were subsequently classified as long-term debt . additionally , during december 2013 , devon entered into a term loan agreement with a group of major financial institutions pursuant to which devon could draw up to $ 2.0 billion to finance , in part , the geosouthern acquisition and to pay transaction costs . in february 2014 , devon drew the $ 2.0 billion of term loans for the geosouthern transaction , and the amount was subsequently repaid on june 30 , 2014 with the canadian divestiture proceeds that were repatriated to the u.s . in june 2014 , at which point the term loan was terminated. .
Question: what was the combined floating rate due for 2015 and 2016?
Answer: 850.0
Question: so what portion of the net proceeds came from the floating rates during these years?
Answer: 0.37811
Question: and as a percentage?
Answer: 37.81139
Question: what were the net discounts and issuance costs associated with the issuance of fixed and floating rate senior notes?
| 0.05 |
CONVFINQA5103 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) other debentures and notes following are descriptions of the various other debentures and notes outstanding at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , as listed in the table presented at the beginning of this note . geosouthern debt in december 2013 , in conjunction with the planned geosouthern acquisition , devon issued $ 2.25 billion aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate senior notes resulting in cash proceeds of approximately $ 2.2 billion , net of discounts and issuance costs . the floating rate senior notes due in 2015 bear interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.45 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the floating rate senior notes due in 2016 bears interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.54 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the schedule below summarizes the key terms of these notes ( in millions ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>floating rate due december 15 2015</td><td>$ 500</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>floating rate due december 15 2016</td><td>350</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1.20% ( 1.20 % ) due december 15 2016 ( 1 )</td><td>650</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2.25% ( 2.25 % ) due december 15 2018</td><td>750</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>discount and issuance costs</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net proceeds</td><td>$ 2248</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the 1.20% ( 1.20 % ) $ 650 million note due december 15 , 2016 was redeemed on november 13 , 2014 . the senior notes were classified as short-term debt on devon 2019s consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2013 due to certain redemption features in the event that the geosouthern acquisition was not completed on or prior to june 30 , 2014 . on february 28 , 2014 , the geosouthern acquisition closed and thus the senior notes were subsequently classified as long-term debt . additionally , during december 2013 , devon entered into a term loan agreement with a group of major financial institutions pursuant to which devon could draw up to $ 2.0 billion to finance , in part , the geosouthern acquisition and to pay transaction costs . in february 2014 , devon drew the $ 2.0 billion of term loans for the geosouthern transaction , and the amount was subsequently repaid on june 30 , 2014 with the canadian divestiture proceeds that were repatriated to the u.s . in june 2014 , at which point the term loan was terminated. .
Question: what was the combined floating rate due for 2015 and 2016?
Answer: 850.0
Question: so what portion of the net proceeds came from the floating rates during these years?
Answer: 0.37811
Question: and as a percentage?
Answer: 37.81139
Question: what were the net discounts and issuance costs associated with the issuance of fixed and floating rate senior notes?
Answer: 0.05
Question: so what percent of this value makes up the planned geosouthern acquisition?
| 0.02273 |
CONVFINQA5104 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
kendal vroman , 39 mr . vroman has served as our managing director , commodity products , otc services & information products since february 2010 . mr . vroman previously served as managing director and chief corporate development officer from 2008 to 2010 . mr . vroman joined us in 2001 and since then has held positions of increasing responsibility , including most recently as managing director , corporate development and managing director , information and technology services . scot e . warren , 47 mr . warren has served as our managing director , equity index products and index services since february 2010 . mr . warren previously served as our managing director , equity products since joining us in 2007 . prior to that , mr . warren worked for goldman sachs as its president , manager trading and business analysis team . prior to goldman sachs , mr . warren managed equity and option execution and clearing businesses for abn amro in chicago and was a senior consultant for arthur andersen & co . for financial services firms . financial information about geographic areas due to the nature of its business , cme group does not track revenues based upon geographic location . we do , however , track trading volume generated outside of traditional u.s . trading hours and through our international telecommunication hubs . our customers can directly access our exchanges throughout the world . the following table shows the percentage of our total trading volume on our globex electronic trading platform generated during non-u.s . hours and through our international hubs. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>trading during non-u.s . hours</td><td>13% ( 13 % )</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td><td>11% ( 11 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trading through telecommunication hubs</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>8</td></tr></table> available information our web site is www.cmegroup.com . information made available on our web site does not constitute part of this document . we make available on our web site our annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8-k and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such materials to the sec . our corporate governance materials , including our corporate governance principles , director conflict of interest policy , board of directors code of ethics , categorical independence standards , employee code of conduct and the charters for all the standing committees of our board , may also be found on our web site . copies of these materials are also available to shareholders free of charge upon written request to shareholder relations and member services , attention ms . beth hausoul , cme group inc. , 20 south wacker drive , chicago , illinois 60606. .
Question: what was the percentage of trading during non-u.s. hours in 2008?
| 11.0 |
CONVFINQA5105 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
kendal vroman , 39 mr . vroman has served as our managing director , commodity products , otc services & information products since february 2010 . mr . vroman previously served as managing director and chief corporate development officer from 2008 to 2010 . mr . vroman joined us in 2001 and since then has held positions of increasing responsibility , including most recently as managing director , corporate development and managing director , information and technology services . scot e . warren , 47 mr . warren has served as our managing director , equity index products and index services since february 2010 . mr . warren previously served as our managing director , equity products since joining us in 2007 . prior to that , mr . warren worked for goldman sachs as its president , manager trading and business analysis team . prior to goldman sachs , mr . warren managed equity and option execution and clearing businesses for abn amro in chicago and was a senior consultant for arthur andersen & co . for financial services firms . financial information about geographic areas due to the nature of its business , cme group does not track revenues based upon geographic location . we do , however , track trading volume generated outside of traditional u.s . trading hours and through our international telecommunication hubs . our customers can directly access our exchanges throughout the world . the following table shows the percentage of our total trading volume on our globex electronic trading platform generated during non-u.s . hours and through our international hubs. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>trading during non-u.s . hours</td><td>13% ( 13 % )</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td><td>11% ( 11 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trading through telecommunication hubs</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>8</td></tr></table> available information our web site is www.cmegroup.com . information made available on our web site does not constitute part of this document . we make available on our web site our annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8-k and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such materials to the sec . our corporate governance materials , including our corporate governance principles , director conflict of interest policy , board of directors code of ethics , categorical independence standards , employee code of conduct and the charters for all the standing committees of our board , may also be found on our web site . copies of these materials are also available to shareholders free of charge upon written request to shareholder relations and member services , attention ms . beth hausoul , cme group inc. , 20 south wacker drive , chicago , illinois 60606. .
Question: what was the percentage of trading during non-u.s. hours in 2008?
Answer: 11.0
Question: and the portion that was traded during u.s. hours?
| 89.0 |
CONVFINQA5106 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
kendal vroman , 39 mr . vroman has served as our managing director , commodity products , otc services & information products since february 2010 . mr . vroman previously served as managing director and chief corporate development officer from 2008 to 2010 . mr . vroman joined us in 2001 and since then has held positions of increasing responsibility , including most recently as managing director , corporate development and managing director , information and technology services . scot e . warren , 47 mr . warren has served as our managing director , equity index products and index services since february 2010 . mr . warren previously served as our managing director , equity products since joining us in 2007 . prior to that , mr . warren worked for goldman sachs as its president , manager trading and business analysis team . prior to goldman sachs , mr . warren managed equity and option execution and clearing businesses for abn amro in chicago and was a senior consultant for arthur andersen & co . for financial services firms . financial information about geographic areas due to the nature of its business , cme group does not track revenues based upon geographic location . we do , however , track trading volume generated outside of traditional u.s . trading hours and through our international telecommunication hubs . our customers can directly access our exchanges throughout the world . the following table shows the percentage of our total trading volume on our globex electronic trading platform generated during non-u.s . hours and through our international hubs. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>trading during non-u.s . hours</td><td>13% ( 13 % )</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td><td>11% ( 11 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trading through telecommunication hubs</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>8</td></tr></table> available information our web site is www.cmegroup.com . information made available on our web site does not constitute part of this document . we make available on our web site our annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8-k and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such materials to the sec . our corporate governance materials , including our corporate governance principles , director conflict of interest policy , board of directors code of ethics , categorical independence standards , employee code of conduct and the charters for all the standing committees of our board , may also be found on our web site . copies of these materials are also available to shareholders free of charge upon written request to shareholder relations and member services , attention ms . beth hausoul , cme group inc. , 20 south wacker drive , chicago , illinois 60606. .
Question: what was the percentage of trading during non-u.s. hours in 2008?
Answer: 11.0
Question: and the portion that was traded during u.s. hours?
Answer: 89.0
Question: and trading during non-u.s. hours for the next year?
| 9.0 |
CONVFINQA5107 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
kendal vroman , 39 mr . vroman has served as our managing director , commodity products , otc services & information products since february 2010 . mr . vroman previously served as managing director and chief corporate development officer from 2008 to 2010 . mr . vroman joined us in 2001 and since then has held positions of increasing responsibility , including most recently as managing director , corporate development and managing director , information and technology services . scot e . warren , 47 mr . warren has served as our managing director , equity index products and index services since february 2010 . mr . warren previously served as our managing director , equity products since joining us in 2007 . prior to that , mr . warren worked for goldman sachs as its president , manager trading and business analysis team . prior to goldman sachs , mr . warren managed equity and option execution and clearing businesses for abn amro in chicago and was a senior consultant for arthur andersen & co . for financial services firms . financial information about geographic areas due to the nature of its business , cme group does not track revenues based upon geographic location . we do , however , track trading volume generated outside of traditional u.s . trading hours and through our international telecommunication hubs . our customers can directly access our exchanges throughout the world . the following table shows the percentage of our total trading volume on our globex electronic trading platform generated during non-u.s . hours and through our international hubs. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>trading during non-u.s . hours</td><td>13% ( 13 % )</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td><td>11% ( 11 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trading through telecommunication hubs</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>8</td></tr></table> available information our web site is www.cmegroup.com . information made available on our web site does not constitute part of this document . we make available on our web site our annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8-k and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such materials to the sec . our corporate governance materials , including our corporate governance principles , director conflict of interest policy , board of directors code of ethics , categorical independence standards , employee code of conduct and the charters for all the standing committees of our board , may also be found on our web site . copies of these materials are also available to shareholders free of charge upon written request to shareholder relations and member services , attention ms . beth hausoul , cme group inc. , 20 south wacker drive , chicago , illinois 60606. .
Question: what was the percentage of trading during non-u.s. hours in 2008?
Answer: 11.0
Question: and the portion that was traded during u.s. hours?
Answer: 89.0
Question: and trading during non-u.s. hours for the next year?
Answer: 9.0
Question: and the portion traded during u.s. hours?
| 91.0 |
CONVFINQA5108 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
kendal vroman , 39 mr . vroman has served as our managing director , commodity products , otc services & information products since february 2010 . mr . vroman previously served as managing director and chief corporate development officer from 2008 to 2010 . mr . vroman joined us in 2001 and since then has held positions of increasing responsibility , including most recently as managing director , corporate development and managing director , information and technology services . scot e . warren , 47 mr . warren has served as our managing director , equity index products and index services since february 2010 . mr . warren previously served as our managing director , equity products since joining us in 2007 . prior to that , mr . warren worked for goldman sachs as its president , manager trading and business analysis team . prior to goldman sachs , mr . warren managed equity and option execution and clearing businesses for abn amro in chicago and was a senior consultant for arthur andersen & co . for financial services firms . financial information about geographic areas due to the nature of its business , cme group does not track revenues based upon geographic location . we do , however , track trading volume generated outside of traditional u.s . trading hours and through our international telecommunication hubs . our customers can directly access our exchanges throughout the world . the following table shows the percentage of our total trading volume on our globex electronic trading platform generated during non-u.s . hours and through our international hubs. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>trading during non-u.s . hours</td><td>13% ( 13 % )</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td><td>11% ( 11 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trading through telecommunication hubs</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>8</td></tr></table> available information our web site is www.cmegroup.com . information made available on our web site does not constitute part of this document . we make available on our web site our annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8-k and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such materials to the sec . our corporate governance materials , including our corporate governance principles , director conflict of interest policy , board of directors code of ethics , categorical independence standards , employee code of conduct and the charters for all the standing committees of our board , may also be found on our web site . copies of these materials are also available to shareholders free of charge upon written request to shareholder relations and member services , attention ms . beth hausoul , cme group inc. , 20 south wacker drive , chicago , illinois 60606. .
Question: what was the percentage of trading during non-u.s. hours in 2008?
Answer: 11.0
Question: and the portion that was traded during u.s. hours?
Answer: 89.0
Question: and trading during non-u.s. hours for the next year?
Answer: 9.0
Question: and the portion traded during u.s. hours?
Answer: 91.0
Question: so what was the increase in trading during u.s. hours between the two years?
| 2.0 |
CONVFINQA5109 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201ccompany 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d . 1 . nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad operating in the u.s . our network includes 32122 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s . gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways . we own 26042 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases . we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico . export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders . the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment . although we provide and analyze revenue by commodity group , we treat the financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network . the following table provides freight revenue by commodity group: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>agricultural products</td><td>$ 3685</td><td>$ 3625</td><td>$ 3581</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>automotive</td><td>1998</td><td>2000</td><td>2154</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>chemicals</td><td>3596</td><td>3474</td><td>3543</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>coal</td><td>2645</td><td>2440</td><td>3237</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>industrial products</td><td>4078</td><td>3348</td><td>3808</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intermodal</td><td>3835</td><td>3714</td><td>4074</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total freight revenues</td><td>$ 19837</td><td>$ 18601</td><td>$ 20397</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other revenues</td><td>1403</td><td>1340</td><td>1416</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total operating revenues</td><td>$ 21240</td><td>$ 19941</td><td>$ 21813</td></tr></table> although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products we transport are outside the u.s . each of our commodity groups includes revenue from shipments to and from mexico . included in the above table are freight revenues from our mexico business which amounted to $ 2.3 billion in 2017 , $ 2.2 billion in 2016 , and $ 2.2 billion in 2015 . basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) . 2 . significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries . investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . all intercompany transactions are eliminated . we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements . cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less . accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts . the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions . receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position. .
Question: what is the percentage of the total network route miles that is owned by the company?
| 0.81072 |
CONVFINQA5110 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201ccompany 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d . 1 . nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad operating in the u.s . our network includes 32122 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s . gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways . we own 26042 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases . we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico . export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders . the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment . although we provide and analyze revenue by commodity group , we treat the financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network . the following table provides freight revenue by commodity group: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>agricultural products</td><td>$ 3685</td><td>$ 3625</td><td>$ 3581</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>automotive</td><td>1998</td><td>2000</td><td>2154</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>chemicals</td><td>3596</td><td>3474</td><td>3543</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>coal</td><td>2645</td><td>2440</td><td>3237</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>industrial products</td><td>4078</td><td>3348</td><td>3808</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intermodal</td><td>3835</td><td>3714</td><td>4074</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total freight revenues</td><td>$ 19837</td><td>$ 18601</td><td>$ 20397</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other revenues</td><td>1403</td><td>1340</td><td>1416</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total operating revenues</td><td>$ 21240</td><td>$ 19941</td><td>$ 21813</td></tr></table> although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products we transport are outside the u.s . each of our commodity groups includes revenue from shipments to and from mexico . included in the above table are freight revenues from our mexico business which amounted to $ 2.3 billion in 2017 , $ 2.2 billion in 2016 , and $ 2.2 billion in 2015 . basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) . 2 . significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries . investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . all intercompany transactions are eliminated . we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements . cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less . accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts . the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions . receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position. .
Question: what is the percentage of the total network route miles that is owned by the company?
Answer: 0.81072
Question: and in 2017, what was the percentage of the total operating revenues that was due to industrial products?
| 0.192 |
CONVFINQA5111 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
common stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . we have been funding and expect to continue to fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations . in the future , we may also choose to fund our stock repurchase program under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2008 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 and 2013 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312008</td><td>december 312009</td><td>december 312010</td><td>december 312011</td><td>december 312012</td><td>december 312013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 216.60</td><td>$ 294.49</td><td>$ 289.34</td><td>$ 448.31</td><td>$ 638.56</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 207.32</td><td>$ 287.71</td><td>$ 277.03</td><td>$ 416.52</td><td>$ 602.08</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 198.06</td><td>$ 274.01</td><td>$ 281.55</td><td>$ 436.89</td><td>$ 626.29</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 123.45</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 157.90</td><td>$ 204.63</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 151.63</td><td>$ 181.00</td><td>$ 208.91</td><td>$ 286.74</td><td>$ 454.87</td></tr></table> equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the change in the performance price of the disca stock from 2008 to 2013?
| 538.56 |
CONVFINQA5112 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
common stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . we have been funding and expect to continue to fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations . in the future , we may also choose to fund our stock repurchase program under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2008 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 and 2013 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312008</td><td>december 312009</td><td>december 312010</td><td>december 312011</td><td>december 312012</td><td>december 312013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 216.60</td><td>$ 294.49</td><td>$ 289.34</td><td>$ 448.31</td><td>$ 638.56</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 207.32</td><td>$ 287.71</td><td>$ 277.03</td><td>$ 416.52</td><td>$ 602.08</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 198.06</td><td>$ 274.01</td><td>$ 281.55</td><td>$ 436.89</td><td>$ 626.29</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 123.45</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 157.90</td><td>$ 204.63</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 151.63</td><td>$ 181.00</td><td>$ 208.91</td><td>$ 286.74</td><td>$ 454.87</td></tr></table> equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the change in the performance price of the disca stock from 2008 to 2013?
Answer: 538.56
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of that performance price in 2008?
| 5.3856 |
CONVFINQA5113 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
common stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . we have been funding and expect to continue to fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations . in the future , we may also choose to fund our stock repurchase program under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2008 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 and 2013 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312008</td><td>december 312009</td><td>december 312010</td><td>december 312011</td><td>december 312012</td><td>december 312013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 216.60</td><td>$ 294.49</td><td>$ 289.34</td><td>$ 448.31</td><td>$ 638.56</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 207.32</td><td>$ 287.71</td><td>$ 277.03</td><td>$ 416.52</td><td>$ 602.08</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 198.06</td><td>$ 274.01</td><td>$ 281.55</td><td>$ 436.89</td><td>$ 626.29</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 123.45</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 157.90</td><td>$ 204.63</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 151.63</td><td>$ 181.00</td><td>$ 208.91</td><td>$ 286.74</td><td>$ 454.87</td></tr></table> equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the change in the performance price of the disca stock from 2008 to 2013?
Answer: 538.56
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of that performance price in 2008?
Answer: 5.3856
Question: in that same period, what was the change in the performance price of the discb stock?
| 502.08 |
CONVFINQA5114 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
common stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . we have been funding and expect to continue to fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations . in the future , we may also choose to fund our stock repurchase program under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2008 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 and 2013 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312008</td><td>december 312009</td><td>december 312010</td><td>december 312011</td><td>december 312012</td><td>december 312013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 216.60</td><td>$ 294.49</td><td>$ 289.34</td><td>$ 448.31</td><td>$ 638.56</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 207.32</td><td>$ 287.71</td><td>$ 277.03</td><td>$ 416.52</td><td>$ 602.08</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 198.06</td><td>$ 274.01</td><td>$ 281.55</td><td>$ 436.89</td><td>$ 626.29</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 123.45</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 139.23</td><td>$ 157.90</td><td>$ 204.63</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 151.63</td><td>$ 181.00</td><td>$ 208.91</td><td>$ 286.74</td><td>$ 454.87</td></tr></table> equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the change in the performance price of the disca stock from 2008 to 2013?
Answer: 538.56
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of that performance price in 2008?
Answer: 5.3856
Question: in that same period, what was the change in the performance price of the discb stock?
Answer: 502.08
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to the performance price of that stock in 2008, in percentage?
| 5.0208 |
CONVFINQA5115 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii , item 8 schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock ( stated in millions ) issued in treasury shares outstanding . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>issued</td><td>in treasury</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1 2007</td><td>1334</td><td>-156 ( 156 )</td><td>1178</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>14</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>18</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2007</td><td>1334</td><td>-138 ( 138 )</td><td>1196</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>12</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>balance december 31 2008</td><td>1334</td><td>-140 ( 140 )</td><td>1194</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>vesting of restricted stock</td><td>2013</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>balance december 31 2009</td><td>1334</td><td>-139 ( 139 )</td><td>1195</td></tr></table> see the notes to consolidated financial statements .
Question: what is the balance of shares outstanding at the end of 2009?
| 1195.0 |
CONVFINQA5116 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii , item 8 schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock ( stated in millions ) issued in treasury shares outstanding . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>issued</td><td>in treasury</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1 2007</td><td>1334</td><td>-156 ( 156 )</td><td>1178</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>14</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>18</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2007</td><td>1334</td><td>-138 ( 138 )</td><td>1196</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>12</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>balance december 31 2008</td><td>1334</td><td>-140 ( 140 )</td><td>1194</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>vesting of restricted stock</td><td>2013</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>balance december 31 2009</td><td>1334</td><td>-139 ( 139 )</td><td>1195</td></tr></table> see the notes to consolidated financial statements .
Question: what is the balance of shares outstanding at the end of 2009?
Answer: 1195.0
Question: what about 2008?
| 1194.0 |
CONVFINQA5117 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii , item 8 schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock ( stated in millions ) issued in treasury shares outstanding . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>issued</td><td>in treasury</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1 2007</td><td>1334</td><td>-156 ( 156 )</td><td>1178</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>14</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>18</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2007</td><td>1334</td><td>-138 ( 138 )</td><td>1196</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>12</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>balance december 31 2008</td><td>1334</td><td>-140 ( 140 )</td><td>1194</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>vesting of restricted stock</td><td>2013</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>balance december 31 2009</td><td>1334</td><td>-139 ( 139 )</td><td>1195</td></tr></table> see the notes to consolidated financial statements .
Question: what is the balance of shares outstanding at the end of 2009?
Answer: 1195.0
Question: what about 2008?
Answer: 1194.0
Question: what is the net change?
| 1.0 |
CONVFINQA5118 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii , item 8 schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock ( stated in millions ) issued in treasury shares outstanding . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>issued</td><td>in treasury</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1 2007</td><td>1334</td><td>-156 ( 156 )</td><td>1178</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>14</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>18</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2007</td><td>1334</td><td>-138 ( 138 )</td><td>1196</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>12</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>balance december 31 2008</td><td>1334</td><td>-140 ( 140 )</td><td>1194</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>vesting of restricted stock</td><td>2013</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>balance december 31 2009</td><td>1334</td><td>-139 ( 139 )</td><td>1195</td></tr></table> see the notes to consolidated financial statements .
Question: what is the balance of shares outstanding at the end of 2009?
Answer: 1195.0
Question: what about 2008?
Answer: 1194.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 1.0
Question: what about if this change was added to the 2009's balance, in millions?
| 1196.0 |
CONVFINQA5119 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii , item 8 schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock ( stated in millions ) issued in treasury shares outstanding . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>issued</td><td>in treasury</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1 2007</td><td>1334</td><td>-156 ( 156 )</td><td>1178</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>14</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>18</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2007</td><td>1334</td><td>-138 ( 138 )</td><td>1196</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>12</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>balance december 31 2008</td><td>1334</td><td>-140 ( 140 )</td><td>1194</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>vesting of restricted stock</td><td>2013</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>balance december 31 2009</td><td>1334</td><td>-139 ( 139 )</td><td>1195</td></tr></table> see the notes to consolidated financial statements .
Question: what is the balance of shares outstanding at the end of 2009?
Answer: 1195.0
Question: what about 2008?
Answer: 1194.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 1.0
Question: what about if this change was added to the 2009's balance, in millions?
Answer: 1196.0
Question: what about in total number of shares?
| 1196000000.0 |
CONVFINQA5120 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
we also record an inventory obsolescence reserve , which represents the difference between the cost of the inventory and its estimated realizable value , based on various product sales projections . this reserve is calcu- lated using an estimated obsolescence percentage applied to the inventory based on age , historical trends and requirements to support forecasted sales . in addition , and as necessary , we may establish specific reserves for future known or anticipated events . pension and other post-retirement benefit costs we offer the following benefits to some or all of our employees : a domestic trust-based noncontributory qual- ified defined benefit pension plan ( 201cu.s . qualified plan 201d ) and an unfunded , non-qualified domestic noncon- tributory pension plan to provide benefits in excess of statutory limitations ( collectively with the u.s . qualified plan , the 201cdomestic plans 201d ) ; a domestic contributory defined contribution plan ; international pension plans , which vary by country , consisting of both defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans ; deferred compensation arrangements ; and certain other post- retirement benefit plans . the amounts needed to fund future payouts under our defined benefit pension and post-retirement benefit plans are subject to numerous assumptions and variables . cer- tain significant variables require us to make assumptions that are within our control such as an anticipated discount rate , expected rate of return on plan assets and future compensation levels . we evaluate these assumptions with our actuarial advisors and select assumptions that we believe reflect the economics underlying our pension and post-retirement obligations . while we believe these assumptions are within accepted industry ranges , an increase or decrease in the assumptions or economic events outside our control could have a direct impact on reported net earnings . the discount rate for each plan used for determining future net periodic benefit cost is based on a review of highly rated long-term bonds . for fiscal 2013 , we used a discount rate for our domestic plans of 3.90% ( 3.90 % ) and vary- ing rates on our international plans of between 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) and 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) . the discount rate for our domestic plans is based on a bond portfolio that includes only long-term bonds with an aa rating , or equivalent , from a major rating agency . as of june 30 , 2013 , we used an above-mean yield curve , rather than the broad-based yield curve we used before , because we believe it represents a better estimate of an effective settlement rate of the obligation , and the timing and amount of cash flows related to the bonds included in this portfolio are expected to match the estimated defined benefit payment streams of our domestic plans . the benefit obligation of our domestic plans would have been higher by approximately $ 34 mil- lion at june 30 , 2013 had we not used the above-mean yield curve . for our international plans , the discount rate in a particular country was principally determined based on a yield curve constructed from high quality corporate bonds in each country , with the resulting portfolio having a duration matching that particular plan . for fiscal 2013 , we used an expected return on plan assets of 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) for our u.s . qualified plan and varying rates of between 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) and 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) for our international plans . in determining the long-term rate of return for a plan , we consider the historical rates of return , the nature of the plan 2019s investments and an expectation for the plan 2019s investment strategies . see 201cnote 12 2014 pension , deferred compensation and post-retirement benefit plans 201d of notes to consolidated financial statements for details regarding the nature of our pension and post-retirement plan invest- ments . the difference between actual and expected return on plan assets is reported as a component of accu- mulated other comprehensive income . those gains/losses that are subject to amortization over future periods will be recognized as a component of the net periodic benefit cost in such future periods . for fiscal 2013 , our pension plans had actual return on assets of approximately $ 74 million as compared with expected return on assets of approximately $ 64 million . the resulting net deferred gain of approximately $ 10 million , when combined with gains and losses from previous years , will be amortized over periods ranging from approximately 7 to 22 years . the actual return on plan assets from our international pen- sion plans exceeded expectations , primarily reflecting a strong performance from fixed income and equity invest- ments . the lower than expected return on assets from our u.s . qualified plan was primarily due to weakness in our fixed income investments , partially offset by our strong equity returns . a 25 basis-point change in the discount rate or the expected rate of return on plan assets would have had the following effect on fiscal 2013 pension expense : 25 basis-point 25 basis-point increase decrease ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>25 basis-point increase</td><td>25 basis-point decrease</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>discount rate</td><td>$ -3.5 ( 3.5 )</td><td>$ 3.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected return on assets</td><td>$ -2.5 ( 2.5 )</td><td>$ 2.7</td></tr></table> our post-retirement plans are comprised of health care plans that could be impacted by health care cost trend rates , which may have a significant effect on the amounts the est{e lauder companies inc . 115 .
Question: what was the actual return on assets in 2013?
| 74.0 |
CONVFINQA5121 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
we also record an inventory obsolescence reserve , which represents the difference between the cost of the inventory and its estimated realizable value , based on various product sales projections . this reserve is calcu- lated using an estimated obsolescence percentage applied to the inventory based on age , historical trends and requirements to support forecasted sales . in addition , and as necessary , we may establish specific reserves for future known or anticipated events . pension and other post-retirement benefit costs we offer the following benefits to some or all of our employees : a domestic trust-based noncontributory qual- ified defined benefit pension plan ( 201cu.s . qualified plan 201d ) and an unfunded , non-qualified domestic noncon- tributory pension plan to provide benefits in excess of statutory limitations ( collectively with the u.s . qualified plan , the 201cdomestic plans 201d ) ; a domestic contributory defined contribution plan ; international pension plans , which vary by country , consisting of both defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans ; deferred compensation arrangements ; and certain other post- retirement benefit plans . the amounts needed to fund future payouts under our defined benefit pension and post-retirement benefit plans are subject to numerous assumptions and variables . cer- tain significant variables require us to make assumptions that are within our control such as an anticipated discount rate , expected rate of return on plan assets and future compensation levels . we evaluate these assumptions with our actuarial advisors and select assumptions that we believe reflect the economics underlying our pension and post-retirement obligations . while we believe these assumptions are within accepted industry ranges , an increase or decrease in the assumptions or economic events outside our control could have a direct impact on reported net earnings . the discount rate for each plan used for determining future net periodic benefit cost is based on a review of highly rated long-term bonds . for fiscal 2013 , we used a discount rate for our domestic plans of 3.90% ( 3.90 % ) and vary- ing rates on our international plans of between 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) and 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) . the discount rate for our domestic plans is based on a bond portfolio that includes only long-term bonds with an aa rating , or equivalent , from a major rating agency . as of june 30 , 2013 , we used an above-mean yield curve , rather than the broad-based yield curve we used before , because we believe it represents a better estimate of an effective settlement rate of the obligation , and the timing and amount of cash flows related to the bonds included in this portfolio are expected to match the estimated defined benefit payment streams of our domestic plans . the benefit obligation of our domestic plans would have been higher by approximately $ 34 mil- lion at june 30 , 2013 had we not used the above-mean yield curve . for our international plans , the discount rate in a particular country was principally determined based on a yield curve constructed from high quality corporate bonds in each country , with the resulting portfolio having a duration matching that particular plan . for fiscal 2013 , we used an expected return on plan assets of 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) for our u.s . qualified plan and varying rates of between 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) and 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) for our international plans . in determining the long-term rate of return for a plan , we consider the historical rates of return , the nature of the plan 2019s investments and an expectation for the plan 2019s investment strategies . see 201cnote 12 2014 pension , deferred compensation and post-retirement benefit plans 201d of notes to consolidated financial statements for details regarding the nature of our pension and post-retirement plan invest- ments . the difference between actual and expected return on plan assets is reported as a component of accu- mulated other comprehensive income . those gains/losses that are subject to amortization over future periods will be recognized as a component of the net periodic benefit cost in such future periods . for fiscal 2013 , our pension plans had actual return on assets of approximately $ 74 million as compared with expected return on assets of approximately $ 64 million . the resulting net deferred gain of approximately $ 10 million , when combined with gains and losses from previous years , will be amortized over periods ranging from approximately 7 to 22 years . the actual return on plan assets from our international pen- sion plans exceeded expectations , primarily reflecting a strong performance from fixed income and equity invest- ments . the lower than expected return on assets from our u.s . qualified plan was primarily due to weakness in our fixed income investments , partially offset by our strong equity returns . a 25 basis-point change in the discount rate or the expected rate of return on plan assets would have had the following effect on fiscal 2013 pension expense : 25 basis-point 25 basis-point increase decrease ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>25 basis-point increase</td><td>25 basis-point decrease</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>discount rate</td><td>$ -3.5 ( 3.5 )</td><td>$ 3.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected return on assets</td><td>$ -2.5 ( 2.5 )</td><td>$ 2.7</td></tr></table> our post-retirement plans are comprised of health care plans that could be impacted by health care cost trend rates , which may have a significant effect on the amounts the est{e lauder companies inc . 115 .
Question: what was the actual return on assets in 2013?
Answer: 74.0
Question: and the expected return on assets during that time?
| 64.0 |
CONVFINQA5122 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
we also record an inventory obsolescence reserve , which represents the difference between the cost of the inventory and its estimated realizable value , based on various product sales projections . this reserve is calcu- lated using an estimated obsolescence percentage applied to the inventory based on age , historical trends and requirements to support forecasted sales . in addition , and as necessary , we may establish specific reserves for future known or anticipated events . pension and other post-retirement benefit costs we offer the following benefits to some or all of our employees : a domestic trust-based noncontributory qual- ified defined benefit pension plan ( 201cu.s . qualified plan 201d ) and an unfunded , non-qualified domestic noncon- tributory pension plan to provide benefits in excess of statutory limitations ( collectively with the u.s . qualified plan , the 201cdomestic plans 201d ) ; a domestic contributory defined contribution plan ; international pension plans , which vary by country , consisting of both defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans ; deferred compensation arrangements ; and certain other post- retirement benefit plans . the amounts needed to fund future payouts under our defined benefit pension and post-retirement benefit plans are subject to numerous assumptions and variables . cer- tain significant variables require us to make assumptions that are within our control such as an anticipated discount rate , expected rate of return on plan assets and future compensation levels . we evaluate these assumptions with our actuarial advisors and select assumptions that we believe reflect the economics underlying our pension and post-retirement obligations . while we believe these assumptions are within accepted industry ranges , an increase or decrease in the assumptions or economic events outside our control could have a direct impact on reported net earnings . the discount rate for each plan used for determining future net periodic benefit cost is based on a review of highly rated long-term bonds . for fiscal 2013 , we used a discount rate for our domestic plans of 3.90% ( 3.90 % ) and vary- ing rates on our international plans of between 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) and 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) . the discount rate for our domestic plans is based on a bond portfolio that includes only long-term bonds with an aa rating , or equivalent , from a major rating agency . as of june 30 , 2013 , we used an above-mean yield curve , rather than the broad-based yield curve we used before , because we believe it represents a better estimate of an effective settlement rate of the obligation , and the timing and amount of cash flows related to the bonds included in this portfolio are expected to match the estimated defined benefit payment streams of our domestic plans . the benefit obligation of our domestic plans would have been higher by approximately $ 34 mil- lion at june 30 , 2013 had we not used the above-mean yield curve . for our international plans , the discount rate in a particular country was principally determined based on a yield curve constructed from high quality corporate bonds in each country , with the resulting portfolio having a duration matching that particular plan . for fiscal 2013 , we used an expected return on plan assets of 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) for our u.s . qualified plan and varying rates of between 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) and 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) for our international plans . in determining the long-term rate of return for a plan , we consider the historical rates of return , the nature of the plan 2019s investments and an expectation for the plan 2019s investment strategies . see 201cnote 12 2014 pension , deferred compensation and post-retirement benefit plans 201d of notes to consolidated financial statements for details regarding the nature of our pension and post-retirement plan invest- ments . the difference between actual and expected return on plan assets is reported as a component of accu- mulated other comprehensive income . those gains/losses that are subject to amortization over future periods will be recognized as a component of the net periodic benefit cost in such future periods . for fiscal 2013 , our pension plans had actual return on assets of approximately $ 74 million as compared with expected return on assets of approximately $ 64 million . the resulting net deferred gain of approximately $ 10 million , when combined with gains and losses from previous years , will be amortized over periods ranging from approximately 7 to 22 years . the actual return on plan assets from our international pen- sion plans exceeded expectations , primarily reflecting a strong performance from fixed income and equity invest- ments . the lower than expected return on assets from our u.s . qualified plan was primarily due to weakness in our fixed income investments , partially offset by our strong equity returns . a 25 basis-point change in the discount rate or the expected rate of return on plan assets would have had the following effect on fiscal 2013 pension expense : 25 basis-point 25 basis-point increase decrease ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>25 basis-point increase</td><td>25 basis-point decrease</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>discount rate</td><td>$ -3.5 ( 3.5 )</td><td>$ 3.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected return on assets</td><td>$ -2.5 ( 2.5 )</td><td>$ 2.7</td></tr></table> our post-retirement plans are comprised of health care plans that could be impacted by health care cost trend rates , which may have a significant effect on the amounts the est{e lauder companies inc . 115 .
Question: what was the actual return on assets in 2013?
Answer: 74.0
Question: and the expected return on assets during that time?
Answer: 64.0
Question: and the proportion of actual return to expected return?
| 1.15625 |
CONVFINQA5123 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
we also record an inventory obsolescence reserve , which represents the difference between the cost of the inventory and its estimated realizable value , based on various product sales projections . this reserve is calcu- lated using an estimated obsolescence percentage applied to the inventory based on age , historical trends and requirements to support forecasted sales . in addition , and as necessary , we may establish specific reserves for future known or anticipated events . pension and other post-retirement benefit costs we offer the following benefits to some or all of our employees : a domestic trust-based noncontributory qual- ified defined benefit pension plan ( 201cu.s . qualified plan 201d ) and an unfunded , non-qualified domestic noncon- tributory pension plan to provide benefits in excess of statutory limitations ( collectively with the u.s . qualified plan , the 201cdomestic plans 201d ) ; a domestic contributory defined contribution plan ; international pension plans , which vary by country , consisting of both defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans ; deferred compensation arrangements ; and certain other post- retirement benefit plans . the amounts needed to fund future payouts under our defined benefit pension and post-retirement benefit plans are subject to numerous assumptions and variables . cer- tain significant variables require us to make assumptions that are within our control such as an anticipated discount rate , expected rate of return on plan assets and future compensation levels . we evaluate these assumptions with our actuarial advisors and select assumptions that we believe reflect the economics underlying our pension and post-retirement obligations . while we believe these assumptions are within accepted industry ranges , an increase or decrease in the assumptions or economic events outside our control could have a direct impact on reported net earnings . the discount rate for each plan used for determining future net periodic benefit cost is based on a review of highly rated long-term bonds . for fiscal 2013 , we used a discount rate for our domestic plans of 3.90% ( 3.90 % ) and vary- ing rates on our international plans of between 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) and 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) . the discount rate for our domestic plans is based on a bond portfolio that includes only long-term bonds with an aa rating , or equivalent , from a major rating agency . as of june 30 , 2013 , we used an above-mean yield curve , rather than the broad-based yield curve we used before , because we believe it represents a better estimate of an effective settlement rate of the obligation , and the timing and amount of cash flows related to the bonds included in this portfolio are expected to match the estimated defined benefit payment streams of our domestic plans . the benefit obligation of our domestic plans would have been higher by approximately $ 34 mil- lion at june 30 , 2013 had we not used the above-mean yield curve . for our international plans , the discount rate in a particular country was principally determined based on a yield curve constructed from high quality corporate bonds in each country , with the resulting portfolio having a duration matching that particular plan . for fiscal 2013 , we used an expected return on plan assets of 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) for our u.s . qualified plan and varying rates of between 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) and 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) for our international plans . in determining the long-term rate of return for a plan , we consider the historical rates of return , the nature of the plan 2019s investments and an expectation for the plan 2019s investment strategies . see 201cnote 12 2014 pension , deferred compensation and post-retirement benefit plans 201d of notes to consolidated financial statements for details regarding the nature of our pension and post-retirement plan invest- ments . the difference between actual and expected return on plan assets is reported as a component of accu- mulated other comprehensive income . those gains/losses that are subject to amortization over future periods will be recognized as a component of the net periodic benefit cost in such future periods . for fiscal 2013 , our pension plans had actual return on assets of approximately $ 74 million as compared with expected return on assets of approximately $ 64 million . the resulting net deferred gain of approximately $ 10 million , when combined with gains and losses from previous years , will be amortized over periods ranging from approximately 7 to 22 years . the actual return on plan assets from our international pen- sion plans exceeded expectations , primarily reflecting a strong performance from fixed income and equity invest- ments . the lower than expected return on assets from our u.s . qualified plan was primarily due to weakness in our fixed income investments , partially offset by our strong equity returns . a 25 basis-point change in the discount rate or the expected rate of return on plan assets would have had the following effect on fiscal 2013 pension expense : 25 basis-point 25 basis-point increase decrease ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>25 basis-point increase</td><td>25 basis-point decrease</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>discount rate</td><td>$ -3.5 ( 3.5 )</td><td>$ 3.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected return on assets</td><td>$ -2.5 ( 2.5 )</td><td>$ 2.7</td></tr></table> our post-retirement plans are comprised of health care plans that could be impacted by health care cost trend rates , which may have a significant effect on the amounts the est{e lauder companies inc . 115 .
Question: what was the actual return on assets in 2013?
Answer: 74.0
Question: and the expected return on assets during that time?
Answer: 64.0
Question: and the proportion of actual return to expected return?
Answer: 1.15625
Question: so what is this proportion as a decimal?
| 0.15625 |
CONVFINQA5124 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
bhge 2017 form 10-k | 103 part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance information regarding our code of conduct , the spirit and the letter , and code of ethical conduct certificates for our principal executive officer , principal financial officer and principal accounting officer are described in item 1 . business of this annual report . information concerning our directors is set forth in the sections entitled "proposal no . 1 , election of directors - board nominees for directors" and "corporate governance - committees of the board" in our definitive proxy statement for the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the sec pursuant to the exchange act within 120 days of the end of our fiscal year on december 31 , 2017 ( "proxy statement" ) , which sections are incorporated herein by reference . for information regarding our executive officers , see "item 1 . business - executive officers of baker hughes" in this annual report on form 10-k . additional information regarding compliance by directors and executive officers with section 16 ( a ) of the exchange act is set forth under the section entitled "section 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance" in our proxy statement , which section is incorporated herein by reference . item 11 . executive compensation information for this item is set forth in the following sections of our proxy statement , which sections are incorporated herein by reference : "compensation discussion and analysis" "director compensation" "compensation committee interlocks and insider participation" and "compensation committee report." item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters information concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners and our management is set forth in the sections entitled "stock ownership of certain beneficial owners" and 201cstock ownership of section 16 ( a ) director and executive officers 201d ) in our proxy statement , which sections are incorporated herein by reference . we permit our employees , officers and directors to enter into written trading plans complying with rule 10b5-1 under the exchange act . rule 10b5-1 provides criteria under which such an individual may establish a prearranged plan to buy or sell a specified number of shares of a company's stock over a set period of time . any such plan must be entered into in good faith at a time when the individual is not in possession of material , nonpublic information . if an individual establishes a plan satisfying the requirements of rule 10b5-1 , such individual's subsequent receipt of material , nonpublic information will not prevent transactions under the plan from being executed . certain of our officers have advised us that they have and may enter into stock sales plans for the sale of shares of our class a common stock which are intended to comply with the requirements of rule 10b5-1 of the exchange act . in addition , the company has and may in the future enter into repurchases of our class a common stock under a plan that complies with rule 10b5-1 or rule 10b-18 of the exchange act . equity compensation plan information the information in the following table is presented as of december 31 , 2017 with respect to shares of our class a common stock that may be issued under our lti plan which has been approved by our stockholders ( in millions , except per share prices ) . equity compensation plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in the first column ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>equity compensation plancategory</td><td>number ofsecurities to beissued uponexercise ofoutstandingoptions warrantsand rights</td><td>weighted averageexercise price ofoutstandingoptions warrantsand rights</td><td>number of securitiesremaining availablefor future issuanceunder equitycompensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in the firstcolumn )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>stockholder-approved plans</td><td>1.6</td><td>$ 36.61</td><td>53.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nonstockholder-approved plans</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>1.6</td><td>$ 36.61</td><td>53.7</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the sum of the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights and the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans?
| 55.3 |
CONVFINQA5125 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
bhge 2017 form 10-k | 103 part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance information regarding our code of conduct , the spirit and the letter , and code of ethical conduct certificates for our principal executive officer , principal financial officer and principal accounting officer are described in item 1 . business of this annual report . information concerning our directors is set forth in the sections entitled "proposal no . 1 , election of directors - board nominees for directors" and "corporate governance - committees of the board" in our definitive proxy statement for the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the sec pursuant to the exchange act within 120 days of the end of our fiscal year on december 31 , 2017 ( "proxy statement" ) , which sections are incorporated herein by reference . for information regarding our executive officers , see "item 1 . business - executive officers of baker hughes" in this annual report on form 10-k . additional information regarding compliance by directors and executive officers with section 16 ( a ) of the exchange act is set forth under the section entitled "section 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance" in our proxy statement , which section is incorporated herein by reference . item 11 . executive compensation information for this item is set forth in the following sections of our proxy statement , which sections are incorporated herein by reference : "compensation discussion and analysis" "director compensation" "compensation committee interlocks and insider participation" and "compensation committee report." item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters information concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners and our management is set forth in the sections entitled "stock ownership of certain beneficial owners" and 201cstock ownership of section 16 ( a ) director and executive officers 201d ) in our proxy statement , which sections are incorporated herein by reference . we permit our employees , officers and directors to enter into written trading plans complying with rule 10b5-1 under the exchange act . rule 10b5-1 provides criteria under which such an individual may establish a prearranged plan to buy or sell a specified number of shares of a company's stock over a set period of time . any such plan must be entered into in good faith at a time when the individual is not in possession of material , nonpublic information . if an individual establishes a plan satisfying the requirements of rule 10b5-1 , such individual's subsequent receipt of material , nonpublic information will not prevent transactions under the plan from being executed . certain of our officers have advised us that they have and may enter into stock sales plans for the sale of shares of our class a common stock which are intended to comply with the requirements of rule 10b5-1 of the exchange act . in addition , the company has and may in the future enter into repurchases of our class a common stock under a plan that complies with rule 10b5-1 or rule 10b-18 of the exchange act . equity compensation plan information the information in the following table is presented as of december 31 , 2017 with respect to shares of our class a common stock that may be issued under our lti plan which has been approved by our stockholders ( in millions , except per share prices ) . equity compensation plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in the first column ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>equity compensation plancategory</td><td>number ofsecurities to beissued uponexercise ofoutstandingoptions warrantsand rights</td><td>weighted averageexercise price ofoutstandingoptions warrantsand rights</td><td>number of securitiesremaining availablefor future issuanceunder equitycompensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in the firstcolumn )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>stockholder-approved plans</td><td>1.6</td><td>$ 36.61</td><td>53.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nonstockholder-approved plans</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>1.6</td><td>$ 36.61</td><td>53.7</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the sum of the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights and the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans?
Answer: 55.3
Question: what is the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights?
| 1.6 |
CONVFINQA5126 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
bhge 2017 form 10-k | 103 part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance information regarding our code of conduct , the spirit and the letter , and code of ethical conduct certificates for our principal executive officer , principal financial officer and principal accounting officer are described in item 1 . business of this annual report . information concerning our directors is set forth in the sections entitled "proposal no . 1 , election of directors - board nominees for directors" and "corporate governance - committees of the board" in our definitive proxy statement for the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the sec pursuant to the exchange act within 120 days of the end of our fiscal year on december 31 , 2017 ( "proxy statement" ) , which sections are incorporated herein by reference . for information regarding our executive officers , see "item 1 . business - executive officers of baker hughes" in this annual report on form 10-k . additional information regarding compliance by directors and executive officers with section 16 ( a ) of the exchange act is set forth under the section entitled "section 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance" in our proxy statement , which section is incorporated herein by reference . item 11 . executive compensation information for this item is set forth in the following sections of our proxy statement , which sections are incorporated herein by reference : "compensation discussion and analysis" "director compensation" "compensation committee interlocks and insider participation" and "compensation committee report." item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters information concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners and our management is set forth in the sections entitled "stock ownership of certain beneficial owners" and 201cstock ownership of section 16 ( a ) director and executive officers 201d ) in our proxy statement , which sections are incorporated herein by reference . we permit our employees , officers and directors to enter into written trading plans complying with rule 10b5-1 under the exchange act . rule 10b5-1 provides criteria under which such an individual may establish a prearranged plan to buy or sell a specified number of shares of a company's stock over a set period of time . any such plan must be entered into in good faith at a time when the individual is not in possession of material , nonpublic information . if an individual establishes a plan satisfying the requirements of rule 10b5-1 , such individual's subsequent receipt of material , nonpublic information will not prevent transactions under the plan from being executed . certain of our officers have advised us that they have and may enter into stock sales plans for the sale of shares of our class a common stock which are intended to comply with the requirements of rule 10b5-1 of the exchange act . in addition , the company has and may in the future enter into repurchases of our class a common stock under a plan that complies with rule 10b5-1 or rule 10b-18 of the exchange act . equity compensation plan information the information in the following table is presented as of december 31 , 2017 with respect to shares of our class a common stock that may be issued under our lti plan which has been approved by our stockholders ( in millions , except per share prices ) . equity compensation plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in the first column ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>equity compensation plancategory</td><td>number ofsecurities to beissued uponexercise ofoutstandingoptions warrantsand rights</td><td>weighted averageexercise price ofoutstandingoptions warrantsand rights</td><td>number of securitiesremaining availablefor future issuanceunder equitycompensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in the firstcolumn )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>stockholder-approved plans</td><td>1.6</td><td>$ 36.61</td><td>53.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nonstockholder-approved plans</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>1.6</td><td>$ 36.61</td><td>53.7</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the sum of the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights and the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans?
Answer: 55.3
Question: what is the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights?
Answer: 1.6
Question: what is that divided by the sum?
| 0.02893 |
CONVFINQA5127 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
reporting unit 2019s related goodwill assets . in 2013 , we recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $ 195 million , net of state tax benefits . see 201ccritical accounting policies - goodwill 201d in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and 201cnote 1 2013 significant accounting policies 201d for more information on this impairment charge . changes in u.s . or foreign tax laws , including possibly with retroactive effect , and audits by tax authorities could result in unanticipated increases in our tax expense and affect profitability and cash flows . for example , proposals to lower the u.s . corporate income tax rate would require us to reduce our net deferred tax assets upon enactment of the related tax legislation , with a corresponding material , one-time increase to income tax expense , but our income tax expense and payments would be materially reduced in subsequent years . actual financial results could differ from our judgments and estimates . refer to 201ccritical accounting policies 201d in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , and 201cnote 1 2013 significant accounting policies 201d of our consolidated financial statements for a complete discussion of our significant accounting policies and use of estimates . item 1b . unresolved staff comments . item 2 . properties . at december 31 , 2013 , we owned or leased building space ( including offices , manufacturing plants , warehouses , service centers , laboratories , and other facilities ) at 518 locations primarily in the u.s . additionally , we manage or occupy various u.s . government-owned facilities under lease and other arrangements . at december 31 , 2013 , we had significant operations in the following locations : 2022 aeronautics 2013 palmdale , california ; marietta , georgia ; greenville , south carolina ; fort worth and san antonio , texas ; and montreal , canada . 2022 information systems & global solutions 2013 goodyear , arizona ; sunnyvale , california ; colorado springs and denver , colorado ; gaithersburg and rockville , maryland ; valley forge , pennsylvania ; and houston , texas . 2022 missiles and fire control 2013 camden , arkansas ; orlando , florida ; lexington , kentucky ; and grand prairie , texas . 2022 mission systems and training 2013 orlando , florida ; baltimore , maryland ; moorestown/mt . laurel , new jersey ; owego and syracuse , new york ; akron , ohio ; and manassas , virginia . 2022 space systems 2013 huntsville , alabama ; sunnyvale , california ; denver , colorado ; albuquerque , new mexico ; and newtown , pennsylvania . 2022 corporate activities 2013 lakeland , florida and bethesda , maryland . in november 2013 , we committed to a plan to vacate our leased facilities in goodyear , arizona and akron , ohio , and close our owned facility in newtown , pennsylvania and certain owned buildings at our sunnyvale , california facility . we expect these closures , which include approximately 2.5 million square feet of facility space , will be substantially complete by the middle of 2015 . for information regarding these matters , see 201cnote 2 2013 restructuring charges 201d of our consolidated financial statements . the following is a summary of our square feet of floor space by business segment at december 31 , 2013 , inclusive of the facilities that we plan to vacate as mentioned above ( in millions ) : owned leased u.s . government- owned total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>owned</td><td>leased</td><td>u.s . government- owned</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>aeronautics</td><td>5.8</td><td>2.7</td><td>14.2</td><td>22.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>information systems & global solutions</td><td>2.5</td><td>5.7</td><td>2014</td><td>8.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>missiles and fire control</td><td>4.2</td><td>5.1</td><td>1.3</td><td>10.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>mission systems and training</td><td>5.8</td><td>5.3</td><td>0.4</td><td>11.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>space systems</td><td>8.5</td><td>1.6</td><td>7.9</td><td>18.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>corporate activities</td><td>3.0</td><td>0.9</td><td>2014</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>29.8</td><td>21.3</td><td>23.8</td><td>74.9</td></tr></table> we believe our facilities are in good condition and adequate for their current use . we may improve , replace , or reduce facilities as considered appropriate to meet the needs of our operations. .
Question: what portion of total facilities is used for aeronautics as of dec 2013?
| 0.30307 |
CONVFINQA5128 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
reporting unit 2019s related goodwill assets . in 2013 , we recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $ 195 million , net of state tax benefits . see 201ccritical accounting policies - goodwill 201d in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and 201cnote 1 2013 significant accounting policies 201d for more information on this impairment charge . changes in u.s . or foreign tax laws , including possibly with retroactive effect , and audits by tax authorities could result in unanticipated increases in our tax expense and affect profitability and cash flows . for example , proposals to lower the u.s . corporate income tax rate would require us to reduce our net deferred tax assets upon enactment of the related tax legislation , with a corresponding material , one-time increase to income tax expense , but our income tax expense and payments would be materially reduced in subsequent years . actual financial results could differ from our judgments and estimates . refer to 201ccritical accounting policies 201d in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , and 201cnote 1 2013 significant accounting policies 201d of our consolidated financial statements for a complete discussion of our significant accounting policies and use of estimates . item 1b . unresolved staff comments . item 2 . properties . at december 31 , 2013 , we owned or leased building space ( including offices , manufacturing plants , warehouses , service centers , laboratories , and other facilities ) at 518 locations primarily in the u.s . additionally , we manage or occupy various u.s . government-owned facilities under lease and other arrangements . at december 31 , 2013 , we had significant operations in the following locations : 2022 aeronautics 2013 palmdale , california ; marietta , georgia ; greenville , south carolina ; fort worth and san antonio , texas ; and montreal , canada . 2022 information systems & global solutions 2013 goodyear , arizona ; sunnyvale , california ; colorado springs and denver , colorado ; gaithersburg and rockville , maryland ; valley forge , pennsylvania ; and houston , texas . 2022 missiles and fire control 2013 camden , arkansas ; orlando , florida ; lexington , kentucky ; and grand prairie , texas . 2022 mission systems and training 2013 orlando , florida ; baltimore , maryland ; moorestown/mt . laurel , new jersey ; owego and syracuse , new york ; akron , ohio ; and manassas , virginia . 2022 space systems 2013 huntsville , alabama ; sunnyvale , california ; denver , colorado ; albuquerque , new mexico ; and newtown , pennsylvania . 2022 corporate activities 2013 lakeland , florida and bethesda , maryland . in november 2013 , we committed to a plan to vacate our leased facilities in goodyear , arizona and akron , ohio , and close our owned facility in newtown , pennsylvania and certain owned buildings at our sunnyvale , california facility . we expect these closures , which include approximately 2.5 million square feet of facility space , will be substantially complete by the middle of 2015 . for information regarding these matters , see 201cnote 2 2013 restructuring charges 201d of our consolidated financial statements . the following is a summary of our square feet of floor space by business segment at december 31 , 2013 , inclusive of the facilities that we plan to vacate as mentioned above ( in millions ) : owned leased u.s . government- owned total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>owned</td><td>leased</td><td>u.s . government- owned</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>aeronautics</td><td>5.8</td><td>2.7</td><td>14.2</td><td>22.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>information systems & global solutions</td><td>2.5</td><td>5.7</td><td>2014</td><td>8.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>missiles and fire control</td><td>4.2</td><td>5.1</td><td>1.3</td><td>10.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>mission systems and training</td><td>5.8</td><td>5.3</td><td>0.4</td><td>11.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>space systems</td><td>8.5</td><td>1.6</td><td>7.9</td><td>18.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>corporate activities</td><td>3.0</td><td>0.9</td><td>2014</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>29.8</td><td>21.3</td><td>23.8</td><td>74.9</td></tr></table> we believe our facilities are in good condition and adequate for their current use . we may improve , replace , or reduce facilities as considered appropriate to meet the needs of our operations. .
Question: what portion of total facilities is used for aeronautics as of dec 2013?
Answer: 0.30307
Question: what portion of total facilities is used for missiles and fire control as of dec 2013?
| 0.14152 |
CONVFINQA5129 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 74 notes to five year summary ( a ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) ) which , on a combined basis , increased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 173 million , $ 113 million after tax ( $ 0.25 per share ) . ( b ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 215 million , $ 154 million after tax ( $ 0.34 per share ) . also includes a reduction in income tax expense resulting from the closure of an internal revenue service examination of $ 144 million ( $ 0.32 per share ) . these items reduced earnings by $ 10 million after tax ( $ 0.02 per share ) . ( c ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 153 million , $ 102 million after tax ( $ 0.22 per share ) . ( d ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 1112 million , $ 632 million after tax ( $ 1.40 per share ) . in 2002 , the corporation adopted fas 142 which prohibits the amortization of goodwill . ( e ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 973 million , $ 651 million after tax ( $ 1.50 per share ) . also includes a gain from the disposal of a business and charges for the corporation 2019s exit from its global telecommunications services business which is included in discontinued operations and which , on a combined basis , increased the net loss by $ 1 billion ( $ 2.38 per share ) . ( f ) the corporation defines return on invested capital ( roic ) as net income plus after-tax interest expense divided by average invested capital ( stockholders 2019 equity plus debt ) , after adjusting stockholders 2019 equity by adding back the minimum pension liability . the adjustment to add back the minimum pension liability is a revision to our calculation in 2005 , which the corporation believes more closely links roic to management performance . further , the corporation believes that reporting roic provides investors with greater visibility into how effectively lockheed martin uses the capital invested in its operations . the corporation uses roic to evaluate multi-year investment decisions and as a long-term performance measure , and also uses roic as a factor in evaluating management performance under certain incentive compensation plans . roic is not a measure of financial performance under gaap , and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner . roic should not be considered in isola- tion or as an alternative to net earnings as an indicator of performance . the following calculations of roic reflect the revision to the calculation discussed above for all periods presented . ( in millions ) 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings</td><td>$ 1825</td><td>$ 1266</td><td>$ 1053</td><td>$ 500</td><td>$ -1046 ( 1046 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense ( multiplied by 65% ( 65 % ) ) 1</td><td>241</td><td>276</td><td>317</td><td>378</td><td>455</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>return</td><td>$ 2066</td><td>$ 1542</td><td>$ 1370</td><td>$ 878</td><td>$ -591 ( 591 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average debt2 5</td><td>$ 5077</td><td>$ 5932</td><td>$ 6612</td><td>$ 7491</td><td>$ 8782</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>average equity3 5</td><td>7590</td><td>7015</td><td>6170</td><td>6853</td><td>7221</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>average minimum pension liability3 4 5</td><td>1545</td><td>1296</td><td>1504</td><td>341</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average invested capital</td><td>$ 14212</td><td>$ 14243</td><td>$ 14286</td><td>$ 14685</td><td>$ 16009</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>return on invested capital</td><td>14.5% ( 14.5 % )</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>9.6% ( 9.6 % )</td><td>6.0% ( 6.0 % )</td><td>( 3.7 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> 1 represents after-tax interest expense utilizing the federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) . 2 debt consists of long-term debt , including current maturities , and short-term borrowings ( if any ) . 3 equity includes non-cash adjustments for other comprehensive losses , primarily for the additional minimum pension liability . 4 minimum pension liability values reflect the cumulative value of entries identified in our statement of stockholders equity under the caption 201cminimum pension liability . 201d the annual minimum pension liability adjustments to equity were : 2001 = ( $ 33 million ) ; 2002 = ( $ 1537 million ) ; 2003 = $ 331 million ; 2004 = ( $ 285 million ) ; 2005 = ( $ 105 million ) . as these entries are recorded in the fourth quarter , the value added back to our average equity in a given year is the cumulative impact of all prior year entries plus 20% ( 20 % ) of the cur- rent year entry value . 5 yearly averages are calculated using balances at the start of the year and at the end of each quarter . lockheed martin corporation .
Question: what was the increase in earnings before taxes?
| 173.0 |
CONVFINQA5130 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 74 notes to five year summary ( a ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) ) which , on a combined basis , increased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 173 million , $ 113 million after tax ( $ 0.25 per share ) . ( b ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 215 million , $ 154 million after tax ( $ 0.34 per share ) . also includes a reduction in income tax expense resulting from the closure of an internal revenue service examination of $ 144 million ( $ 0.32 per share ) . these items reduced earnings by $ 10 million after tax ( $ 0.02 per share ) . ( c ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 153 million , $ 102 million after tax ( $ 0.22 per share ) . ( d ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 1112 million , $ 632 million after tax ( $ 1.40 per share ) . in 2002 , the corporation adopted fas 142 which prohibits the amortization of goodwill . ( e ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 973 million , $ 651 million after tax ( $ 1.50 per share ) . also includes a gain from the disposal of a business and charges for the corporation 2019s exit from its global telecommunications services business which is included in discontinued operations and which , on a combined basis , increased the net loss by $ 1 billion ( $ 2.38 per share ) . ( f ) the corporation defines return on invested capital ( roic ) as net income plus after-tax interest expense divided by average invested capital ( stockholders 2019 equity plus debt ) , after adjusting stockholders 2019 equity by adding back the minimum pension liability . the adjustment to add back the minimum pension liability is a revision to our calculation in 2005 , which the corporation believes more closely links roic to management performance . further , the corporation believes that reporting roic provides investors with greater visibility into how effectively lockheed martin uses the capital invested in its operations . the corporation uses roic to evaluate multi-year investment decisions and as a long-term performance measure , and also uses roic as a factor in evaluating management performance under certain incentive compensation plans . roic is not a measure of financial performance under gaap , and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner . roic should not be considered in isola- tion or as an alternative to net earnings as an indicator of performance . the following calculations of roic reflect the revision to the calculation discussed above for all periods presented . ( in millions ) 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings</td><td>$ 1825</td><td>$ 1266</td><td>$ 1053</td><td>$ 500</td><td>$ -1046 ( 1046 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense ( multiplied by 65% ( 65 % ) ) 1</td><td>241</td><td>276</td><td>317</td><td>378</td><td>455</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>return</td><td>$ 2066</td><td>$ 1542</td><td>$ 1370</td><td>$ 878</td><td>$ -591 ( 591 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average debt2 5</td><td>$ 5077</td><td>$ 5932</td><td>$ 6612</td><td>$ 7491</td><td>$ 8782</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>average equity3 5</td><td>7590</td><td>7015</td><td>6170</td><td>6853</td><td>7221</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>average minimum pension liability3 4 5</td><td>1545</td><td>1296</td><td>1504</td><td>341</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average invested capital</td><td>$ 14212</td><td>$ 14243</td><td>$ 14286</td><td>$ 14685</td><td>$ 16009</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>return on invested capital</td><td>14.5% ( 14.5 % )</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>9.6% ( 9.6 % )</td><td>6.0% ( 6.0 % )</td><td>( 3.7 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> 1 represents after-tax interest expense utilizing the federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) . 2 debt consists of long-term debt , including current maturities , and short-term borrowings ( if any ) . 3 equity includes non-cash adjustments for other comprehensive losses , primarily for the additional minimum pension liability . 4 minimum pension liability values reflect the cumulative value of entries identified in our statement of stockholders equity under the caption 201cminimum pension liability . 201d the annual minimum pension liability adjustments to equity were : 2001 = ( $ 33 million ) ; 2002 = ( $ 1537 million ) ; 2003 = $ 331 million ; 2004 = ( $ 285 million ) ; 2005 = ( $ 105 million ) . as these entries are recorded in the fourth quarter , the value added back to our average equity in a given year is the cumulative impact of all prior year entries plus 20% ( 20 % ) of the cur- rent year entry value . 5 yearly averages are calculated using balances at the start of the year and at the end of each quarter . lockheed martin corporation .
Question: what was the increase in earnings before taxes?
Answer: 173.0
Question: what was the increase in earnings after taxes?
| 113.0 |
CONVFINQA5131 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 74 notes to five year summary ( a ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) ) which , on a combined basis , increased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 173 million , $ 113 million after tax ( $ 0.25 per share ) . ( b ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 215 million , $ 154 million after tax ( $ 0.34 per share ) . also includes a reduction in income tax expense resulting from the closure of an internal revenue service examination of $ 144 million ( $ 0.32 per share ) . these items reduced earnings by $ 10 million after tax ( $ 0.02 per share ) . ( c ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 153 million , $ 102 million after tax ( $ 0.22 per share ) . ( d ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 1112 million , $ 632 million after tax ( $ 1.40 per share ) . in 2002 , the corporation adopted fas 142 which prohibits the amortization of goodwill . ( e ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 973 million , $ 651 million after tax ( $ 1.50 per share ) . also includes a gain from the disposal of a business and charges for the corporation 2019s exit from its global telecommunications services business which is included in discontinued operations and which , on a combined basis , increased the net loss by $ 1 billion ( $ 2.38 per share ) . ( f ) the corporation defines return on invested capital ( roic ) as net income plus after-tax interest expense divided by average invested capital ( stockholders 2019 equity plus debt ) , after adjusting stockholders 2019 equity by adding back the minimum pension liability . the adjustment to add back the minimum pension liability is a revision to our calculation in 2005 , which the corporation believes more closely links roic to management performance . further , the corporation believes that reporting roic provides investors with greater visibility into how effectively lockheed martin uses the capital invested in its operations . the corporation uses roic to evaluate multi-year investment decisions and as a long-term performance measure , and also uses roic as a factor in evaluating management performance under certain incentive compensation plans . roic is not a measure of financial performance under gaap , and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner . roic should not be considered in isola- tion or as an alternative to net earnings as an indicator of performance . the following calculations of roic reflect the revision to the calculation discussed above for all periods presented . ( in millions ) 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings</td><td>$ 1825</td><td>$ 1266</td><td>$ 1053</td><td>$ 500</td><td>$ -1046 ( 1046 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense ( multiplied by 65% ( 65 % ) ) 1</td><td>241</td><td>276</td><td>317</td><td>378</td><td>455</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>return</td><td>$ 2066</td><td>$ 1542</td><td>$ 1370</td><td>$ 878</td><td>$ -591 ( 591 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average debt2 5</td><td>$ 5077</td><td>$ 5932</td><td>$ 6612</td><td>$ 7491</td><td>$ 8782</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>average equity3 5</td><td>7590</td><td>7015</td><td>6170</td><td>6853</td><td>7221</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>average minimum pension liability3 4 5</td><td>1545</td><td>1296</td><td>1504</td><td>341</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average invested capital</td><td>$ 14212</td><td>$ 14243</td><td>$ 14286</td><td>$ 14685</td><td>$ 16009</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>return on invested capital</td><td>14.5% ( 14.5 % )</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>9.6% ( 9.6 % )</td><td>6.0% ( 6.0 % )</td><td>( 3.7 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> 1 represents after-tax interest expense utilizing the federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) . 2 debt consists of long-term debt , including current maturities , and short-term borrowings ( if any ) . 3 equity includes non-cash adjustments for other comprehensive losses , primarily for the additional minimum pension liability . 4 minimum pension liability values reflect the cumulative value of entries identified in our statement of stockholders equity under the caption 201cminimum pension liability . 201d the annual minimum pension liability adjustments to equity were : 2001 = ( $ 33 million ) ; 2002 = ( $ 1537 million ) ; 2003 = $ 331 million ; 2004 = ( $ 285 million ) ; 2005 = ( $ 105 million ) . as these entries are recorded in the fourth quarter , the value added back to our average equity in a given year is the cumulative impact of all prior year entries plus 20% ( 20 % ) of the cur- rent year entry value . 5 yearly averages are calculated using balances at the start of the year and at the end of each quarter . lockheed martin corporation .
Question: what was the increase in earnings before taxes?
Answer: 173.0
Question: what was the increase in earnings after taxes?
Answer: 113.0
Question: what is the difference?
| 60.0 |
CONVFINQA5132 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 74 notes to five year summary ( a ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) ) which , on a combined basis , increased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 173 million , $ 113 million after tax ( $ 0.25 per share ) . ( b ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 215 million , $ 154 million after tax ( $ 0.34 per share ) . also includes a reduction in income tax expense resulting from the closure of an internal revenue service examination of $ 144 million ( $ 0.32 per share ) . these items reduced earnings by $ 10 million after tax ( $ 0.02 per share ) . ( c ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 153 million , $ 102 million after tax ( $ 0.22 per share ) . ( d ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 1112 million , $ 632 million after tax ( $ 1.40 per share ) . in 2002 , the corporation adopted fas 142 which prohibits the amortization of goodwill . ( e ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 973 million , $ 651 million after tax ( $ 1.50 per share ) . also includes a gain from the disposal of a business and charges for the corporation 2019s exit from its global telecommunications services business which is included in discontinued operations and which , on a combined basis , increased the net loss by $ 1 billion ( $ 2.38 per share ) . ( f ) the corporation defines return on invested capital ( roic ) as net income plus after-tax interest expense divided by average invested capital ( stockholders 2019 equity plus debt ) , after adjusting stockholders 2019 equity by adding back the minimum pension liability . the adjustment to add back the minimum pension liability is a revision to our calculation in 2005 , which the corporation believes more closely links roic to management performance . further , the corporation believes that reporting roic provides investors with greater visibility into how effectively lockheed martin uses the capital invested in its operations . the corporation uses roic to evaluate multi-year investment decisions and as a long-term performance measure , and also uses roic as a factor in evaluating management performance under certain incentive compensation plans . roic is not a measure of financial performance under gaap , and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner . roic should not be considered in isola- tion or as an alternative to net earnings as an indicator of performance . the following calculations of roic reflect the revision to the calculation discussed above for all periods presented . ( in millions ) 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings</td><td>$ 1825</td><td>$ 1266</td><td>$ 1053</td><td>$ 500</td><td>$ -1046 ( 1046 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense ( multiplied by 65% ( 65 % ) ) 1</td><td>241</td><td>276</td><td>317</td><td>378</td><td>455</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>return</td><td>$ 2066</td><td>$ 1542</td><td>$ 1370</td><td>$ 878</td><td>$ -591 ( 591 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average debt2 5</td><td>$ 5077</td><td>$ 5932</td><td>$ 6612</td><td>$ 7491</td><td>$ 8782</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>average equity3 5</td><td>7590</td><td>7015</td><td>6170</td><td>6853</td><td>7221</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>average minimum pension liability3 4 5</td><td>1545</td><td>1296</td><td>1504</td><td>341</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average invested capital</td><td>$ 14212</td><td>$ 14243</td><td>$ 14286</td><td>$ 14685</td><td>$ 16009</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>return on invested capital</td><td>14.5% ( 14.5 % )</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>9.6% ( 9.6 % )</td><td>6.0% ( 6.0 % )</td><td>( 3.7 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> 1 represents after-tax interest expense utilizing the federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) . 2 debt consists of long-term debt , including current maturities , and short-term borrowings ( if any ) . 3 equity includes non-cash adjustments for other comprehensive losses , primarily for the additional minimum pension liability . 4 minimum pension liability values reflect the cumulative value of entries identified in our statement of stockholders equity under the caption 201cminimum pension liability . 201d the annual minimum pension liability adjustments to equity were : 2001 = ( $ 33 million ) ; 2002 = ( $ 1537 million ) ; 2003 = $ 331 million ; 2004 = ( $ 285 million ) ; 2005 = ( $ 105 million ) . as these entries are recorded in the fourth quarter , the value added back to our average equity in a given year is the cumulative impact of all prior year entries plus 20% ( 20 % ) of the cur- rent year entry value . 5 yearly averages are calculated using balances at the start of the year and at the end of each quarter . lockheed martin corporation .
Question: what was the increase in earnings before taxes?
Answer: 173.0
Question: what was the increase in earnings after taxes?
Answer: 113.0
Question: what is the difference?
Answer: 60.0
Question: what was the increase in earnings before taxes?
| 173.0 |
CONVFINQA5133 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 74 notes to five year summary ( a ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) ) which , on a combined basis , increased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 173 million , $ 113 million after tax ( $ 0.25 per share ) . ( b ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 215 million , $ 154 million after tax ( $ 0.34 per share ) . also includes a reduction in income tax expense resulting from the closure of an internal revenue service examination of $ 144 million ( $ 0.32 per share ) . these items reduced earnings by $ 10 million after tax ( $ 0.02 per share ) . ( c ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 153 million , $ 102 million after tax ( $ 0.22 per share ) . ( d ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 1112 million , $ 632 million after tax ( $ 1.40 per share ) . in 2002 , the corporation adopted fas 142 which prohibits the amortization of goodwill . ( e ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 973 million , $ 651 million after tax ( $ 1.50 per share ) . also includes a gain from the disposal of a business and charges for the corporation 2019s exit from its global telecommunications services business which is included in discontinued operations and which , on a combined basis , increased the net loss by $ 1 billion ( $ 2.38 per share ) . ( f ) the corporation defines return on invested capital ( roic ) as net income plus after-tax interest expense divided by average invested capital ( stockholders 2019 equity plus debt ) , after adjusting stockholders 2019 equity by adding back the minimum pension liability . the adjustment to add back the minimum pension liability is a revision to our calculation in 2005 , which the corporation believes more closely links roic to management performance . further , the corporation believes that reporting roic provides investors with greater visibility into how effectively lockheed martin uses the capital invested in its operations . the corporation uses roic to evaluate multi-year investment decisions and as a long-term performance measure , and also uses roic as a factor in evaluating management performance under certain incentive compensation plans . roic is not a measure of financial performance under gaap , and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner . roic should not be considered in isola- tion or as an alternative to net earnings as an indicator of performance . the following calculations of roic reflect the revision to the calculation discussed above for all periods presented . ( in millions ) 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings</td><td>$ 1825</td><td>$ 1266</td><td>$ 1053</td><td>$ 500</td><td>$ -1046 ( 1046 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense ( multiplied by 65% ( 65 % ) ) 1</td><td>241</td><td>276</td><td>317</td><td>378</td><td>455</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>return</td><td>$ 2066</td><td>$ 1542</td><td>$ 1370</td><td>$ 878</td><td>$ -591 ( 591 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average debt2 5</td><td>$ 5077</td><td>$ 5932</td><td>$ 6612</td><td>$ 7491</td><td>$ 8782</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>average equity3 5</td><td>7590</td><td>7015</td><td>6170</td><td>6853</td><td>7221</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>average minimum pension liability3 4 5</td><td>1545</td><td>1296</td><td>1504</td><td>341</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average invested capital</td><td>$ 14212</td><td>$ 14243</td><td>$ 14286</td><td>$ 14685</td><td>$ 16009</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>return on invested capital</td><td>14.5% ( 14.5 % )</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>9.6% ( 9.6 % )</td><td>6.0% ( 6.0 % )</td><td>( 3.7 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> 1 represents after-tax interest expense utilizing the federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) . 2 debt consists of long-term debt , including current maturities , and short-term borrowings ( if any ) . 3 equity includes non-cash adjustments for other comprehensive losses , primarily for the additional minimum pension liability . 4 minimum pension liability values reflect the cumulative value of entries identified in our statement of stockholders equity under the caption 201cminimum pension liability . 201d the annual minimum pension liability adjustments to equity were : 2001 = ( $ 33 million ) ; 2002 = ( $ 1537 million ) ; 2003 = $ 331 million ; 2004 = ( $ 285 million ) ; 2005 = ( $ 105 million ) . as these entries are recorded in the fourth quarter , the value added back to our average equity in a given year is the cumulative impact of all prior year entries plus 20% ( 20 % ) of the cur- rent year entry value . 5 yearly averages are calculated using balances at the start of the year and at the end of each quarter . lockheed martin corporation .
Question: what was the increase in earnings before taxes?
Answer: 173.0
Question: what was the increase in earnings after taxes?
Answer: 113.0
Question: what is the difference?
Answer: 60.0
Question: what was the increase in earnings before taxes?
Answer: 173.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.34682 |
CONVFINQA5134 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
amount of commitment expiration per period other commercial commitments after millions total 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>other commercial commitmentsmillions</td><td>total</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2012</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2013</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2014</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2015</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2016</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period after 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>credit facilities [a]</td><td>$ 1800</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ 1800</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>receivables securitization facility [b]</td><td>600</td><td>600</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>guarantees [c]</td><td>325</td><td>18</td><td>8</td><td>214</td><td>12</td><td>13</td><td>60</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit [d]</td><td>24</td><td>24</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total commercialcommitments</td><td>$ 2749</td><td>$ 642</td><td>$ 8</td><td>$ 214</td><td>$ 1812</td><td>$ 13</td><td>$ 60</td></tr></table> [a] none of the credit facility was used as of december 31 , 2011 . [b] $ 100 million of the receivables securitization facility was utilized at december 31 , 2011 , which is accounted for as debt . the full program matures in august 2012 . [c] includes guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations . [d] none of the letters of credit were drawn upon as of december 31 , 2011 . off-balance sheet arrangements guarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2011 , we were contingently liable for $ 325 million in guarantees . we have recorded a liability of $ 3 million for the fair value of these obligations as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 . we entered into these contingent guarantees in the normal course of business , and they include guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations . the final guarantee expires in 2022 . we are not aware of any existing event of default that would require us to satisfy these guarantees . we do not expect that these guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , results of operations , or liquidity . other matters labor agreements 2013 in january 2010 , the nation 2019s largest freight railroads began the current round of negotiations with the labor unions . generally , contract negotiations with the various unions take place over an extended period of time . this round of negotiations was no exception . in september 2011 , the rail industry reached agreements with the united transportation union . on november 5 , 2011 , a presidential emergency board ( peb ) appointed by president obama issued recommendations to resolve the disputes between the u.s . railroads and 11 unions that had not yet reached agreements . since then , ten unions reached agreements with the railroads , all of them generally patterned on the recommendations of the peb , and the unions subsequently ratified these agreements . the railroad industry reached a tentative agreement with the brotherhood of maintenance of way employees ( bmwe ) on february 2 , 2012 , eliminating the immediate threat of a national rail strike . the bmwe now will commence ratification of this tentative agreement by its members . inflation 2013 long periods of inflation significantly increase asset replacement costs for capital-intensive companies . as a result , assuming that we replace all operating assets at current price levels , depreciation charges ( on an inflation-adjusted basis ) would be substantially greater than historically reported amounts . derivative financial instruments 2013 we may use derivative financial instruments in limited instances to assist in managing our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and fuel prices . we are not a party to leveraged derivatives and , by policy , do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . derivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged , both at inception and throughout the hedged period . we formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items at inception , as well as our risk-management objectives , strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions , and method of assessing hedge effectiveness . changes in the fair market value of derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are charged to earnings . we may use swaps , collars , futures , and/or forward contracts to mitigate the risk of adverse movements in interest rates and fuel prices ; however , the use of these derivative financial instruments may limit future benefits from favorable price movements. .
Question: how much of the receivables securitization facility was available at december 31 , 2011, in millions?
| 500.0 |
CONVFINQA5135 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
amount of commitment expiration per period other commercial commitments after millions total 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>other commercial commitmentsmillions</td><td>total</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2012</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2013</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2014</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2015</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period 2016</td><td>amount of commitment expiration per period after 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>credit facilities [a]</td><td>$ 1800</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ 1800</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ -</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>receivables securitization facility [b]</td><td>600</td><td>600</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>guarantees [c]</td><td>325</td><td>18</td><td>8</td><td>214</td><td>12</td><td>13</td><td>60</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit [d]</td><td>24</td><td>24</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total commercialcommitments</td><td>$ 2749</td><td>$ 642</td><td>$ 8</td><td>$ 214</td><td>$ 1812</td><td>$ 13</td><td>$ 60</td></tr></table> [a] none of the credit facility was used as of december 31 , 2011 . [b] $ 100 million of the receivables securitization facility was utilized at december 31 , 2011 , which is accounted for as debt . the full program matures in august 2012 . [c] includes guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations . [d] none of the letters of credit were drawn upon as of december 31 , 2011 . off-balance sheet arrangements guarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2011 , we were contingently liable for $ 325 million in guarantees . we have recorded a liability of $ 3 million for the fair value of these obligations as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 . we entered into these contingent guarantees in the normal course of business , and they include guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations . the final guarantee expires in 2022 . we are not aware of any existing event of default that would require us to satisfy these guarantees . we do not expect that these guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , results of operations , or liquidity . other matters labor agreements 2013 in january 2010 , the nation 2019s largest freight railroads began the current round of negotiations with the labor unions . generally , contract negotiations with the various unions take place over an extended period of time . this round of negotiations was no exception . in september 2011 , the rail industry reached agreements with the united transportation union . on november 5 , 2011 , a presidential emergency board ( peb ) appointed by president obama issued recommendations to resolve the disputes between the u.s . railroads and 11 unions that had not yet reached agreements . since then , ten unions reached agreements with the railroads , all of them generally patterned on the recommendations of the peb , and the unions subsequently ratified these agreements . the railroad industry reached a tentative agreement with the brotherhood of maintenance of way employees ( bmwe ) on february 2 , 2012 , eliminating the immediate threat of a national rail strike . the bmwe now will commence ratification of this tentative agreement by its members . inflation 2013 long periods of inflation significantly increase asset replacement costs for capital-intensive companies . as a result , assuming that we replace all operating assets at current price levels , depreciation charges ( on an inflation-adjusted basis ) would be substantially greater than historically reported amounts . derivative financial instruments 2013 we may use derivative financial instruments in limited instances to assist in managing our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and fuel prices . we are not a party to leveraged derivatives and , by policy , do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . derivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged , both at inception and throughout the hedged period . we formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items at inception , as well as our risk-management objectives , strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions , and method of assessing hedge effectiveness . changes in the fair market value of derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are charged to earnings . we may use swaps , collars , futures , and/or forward contracts to mitigate the risk of adverse movements in interest rates and fuel prices ; however , the use of these derivative financial instruments may limit future benefits from favorable price movements. .
Question: how much of the receivables securitization facility was available at december 31 , 2011, in millions?
Answer: 500.0
Question: what about in total dollars?
| 500000000.0 |
CONVFINQA5136 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
pre-construction costs , interim dam safety measures and environmental costs and construction costs . the authorized costs were being recovered via a surcharge over a twenty-year period which began in october 2012 . the unrecovered balance of project costs incurred , including cost of capital , net of surcharges totaled $ 85 million and $ 89 million as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . surcharges collected were $ 8 million and $ 7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . pursuant to the general rate case approved in december 2018 , approval was granted to reset the twenty-year amortization period to begin january 1 , 2018 and to establish an annual revenue requirement of $ 8 million to be recovered through base rates . debt expense is amortized over the lives of the respective issues . call premiums on the redemption of long- term debt , as well as unamortized debt expense , are deferred and amortized to the extent they will be recovered through future service rates . purchase premium recoverable through rates is primarily the recovery of the acquisition premiums related to an asset acquisition by the company 2019s utility subsidiary in california during 2002 , and acquisitions in 2007 by the company 2019s utility subsidiary in new jersey . as authorized for recovery by the california and new jersey pucs , these costs are being amortized to depreciation and amortization on the consolidated statements of operations through november 2048 . tank painting costs are generally deferred and amortized to operations and maintenance expense on the consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from five to fifteen years , as authorized by the regulatory authorities in their determination of rates charged for service . as a result of the prepayment by american water capital corp. , the company 2019s wholly owned finance subsidiary ( 201cawcc 201d ) , of the 5.62% ( 5.62 % ) series c senior notes due upon maturity on december 21 , 2018 ( the 201cseries c notes 201d ) , 5.62% ( 5.62 % ) series e senior notes due march 29 , 2019 ( the 201cseries e notes 201d ) and 5.77% ( 5.77 % ) series f senior notes due december 21 , 2022 ( the 201cseries f notes , 201d and together with the series e notes , the 201cseries notes 201d ) , a make-whole premium of $ 10 million was paid to the holders of the series notes on september 11 , 2018 . substantially all of these early debt extinguishment costs were allocable to the company 2019s utility subsidiaries and recorded as regulatory assets , as the company believes they are probable of recovery in future rates . other regulatory assets include certain construction costs for treatment facilities , property tax stabilization , employee-related costs , deferred other postretirement benefit expense , business services project expenses , coastal water project costs , rate case expenditures and environmental remediation costs among others . these costs are deferred because the amounts are being recovered in rates or are probable of recovery through rates in future periods . regulatory liabilities regulatory liabilities generally represent amounts that are probable of being credited or refunded to customers through the rate-making process . also , if costs expected to be incurred in the future are currently being recovered through rates , the company records those expected future costs as regulatory liabilities . the following table provides the composition of regulatory liabilities as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>income taxes recovered through rates</td><td>$ 1279</td><td>$ 1242</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>removal costs recovered through rates</td><td>309</td><td>315</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>postretirement benefit liability</td><td>209</td><td>33</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>pension and other postretirement benefit balancing accounts</td><td>46</td><td>48</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>tcja reserve on revenue</td><td>36</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>28</td><td>26</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total regulatory liabilities</td><td>$ 1907</td><td>$ 1664</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in total regulatory liabilities from 2017 to 2018?
| 243.0 |
CONVFINQA5137 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
pre-construction costs , interim dam safety measures and environmental costs and construction costs . the authorized costs were being recovered via a surcharge over a twenty-year period which began in october 2012 . the unrecovered balance of project costs incurred , including cost of capital , net of surcharges totaled $ 85 million and $ 89 million as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . surcharges collected were $ 8 million and $ 7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . pursuant to the general rate case approved in december 2018 , approval was granted to reset the twenty-year amortization period to begin january 1 , 2018 and to establish an annual revenue requirement of $ 8 million to be recovered through base rates . debt expense is amortized over the lives of the respective issues . call premiums on the redemption of long- term debt , as well as unamortized debt expense , are deferred and amortized to the extent they will be recovered through future service rates . purchase premium recoverable through rates is primarily the recovery of the acquisition premiums related to an asset acquisition by the company 2019s utility subsidiary in california during 2002 , and acquisitions in 2007 by the company 2019s utility subsidiary in new jersey . as authorized for recovery by the california and new jersey pucs , these costs are being amortized to depreciation and amortization on the consolidated statements of operations through november 2048 . tank painting costs are generally deferred and amortized to operations and maintenance expense on the consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from five to fifteen years , as authorized by the regulatory authorities in their determination of rates charged for service . as a result of the prepayment by american water capital corp. , the company 2019s wholly owned finance subsidiary ( 201cawcc 201d ) , of the 5.62% ( 5.62 % ) series c senior notes due upon maturity on december 21 , 2018 ( the 201cseries c notes 201d ) , 5.62% ( 5.62 % ) series e senior notes due march 29 , 2019 ( the 201cseries e notes 201d ) and 5.77% ( 5.77 % ) series f senior notes due december 21 , 2022 ( the 201cseries f notes , 201d and together with the series e notes , the 201cseries notes 201d ) , a make-whole premium of $ 10 million was paid to the holders of the series notes on september 11 , 2018 . substantially all of these early debt extinguishment costs were allocable to the company 2019s utility subsidiaries and recorded as regulatory assets , as the company believes they are probable of recovery in future rates . other regulatory assets include certain construction costs for treatment facilities , property tax stabilization , employee-related costs , deferred other postretirement benefit expense , business services project expenses , coastal water project costs , rate case expenditures and environmental remediation costs among others . these costs are deferred because the amounts are being recovered in rates or are probable of recovery through rates in future periods . regulatory liabilities regulatory liabilities generally represent amounts that are probable of being credited or refunded to customers through the rate-making process . also , if costs expected to be incurred in the future are currently being recovered through rates , the company records those expected future costs as regulatory liabilities . the following table provides the composition of regulatory liabilities as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>income taxes recovered through rates</td><td>$ 1279</td><td>$ 1242</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>removal costs recovered through rates</td><td>309</td><td>315</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>postretirement benefit liability</td><td>209</td><td>33</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>pension and other postretirement benefit balancing accounts</td><td>46</td><td>48</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>tcja reserve on revenue</td><td>36</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>28</td><td>26</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total regulatory liabilities</td><td>$ 1907</td><td>$ 1664</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in total regulatory liabilities from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: 243.0
Question: and what were those total regulatory liabilities in 2017?
| 1664.0 |
CONVFINQA5138 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
pre-construction costs , interim dam safety measures and environmental costs and construction costs . the authorized costs were being recovered via a surcharge over a twenty-year period which began in october 2012 . the unrecovered balance of project costs incurred , including cost of capital , net of surcharges totaled $ 85 million and $ 89 million as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . surcharges collected were $ 8 million and $ 7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . pursuant to the general rate case approved in december 2018 , approval was granted to reset the twenty-year amortization period to begin january 1 , 2018 and to establish an annual revenue requirement of $ 8 million to be recovered through base rates . debt expense is amortized over the lives of the respective issues . call premiums on the redemption of long- term debt , as well as unamortized debt expense , are deferred and amortized to the extent they will be recovered through future service rates . purchase premium recoverable through rates is primarily the recovery of the acquisition premiums related to an asset acquisition by the company 2019s utility subsidiary in california during 2002 , and acquisitions in 2007 by the company 2019s utility subsidiary in new jersey . as authorized for recovery by the california and new jersey pucs , these costs are being amortized to depreciation and amortization on the consolidated statements of operations through november 2048 . tank painting costs are generally deferred and amortized to operations and maintenance expense on the consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from five to fifteen years , as authorized by the regulatory authorities in their determination of rates charged for service . as a result of the prepayment by american water capital corp. , the company 2019s wholly owned finance subsidiary ( 201cawcc 201d ) , of the 5.62% ( 5.62 % ) series c senior notes due upon maturity on december 21 , 2018 ( the 201cseries c notes 201d ) , 5.62% ( 5.62 % ) series e senior notes due march 29 , 2019 ( the 201cseries e notes 201d ) and 5.77% ( 5.77 % ) series f senior notes due december 21 , 2022 ( the 201cseries f notes , 201d and together with the series e notes , the 201cseries notes 201d ) , a make-whole premium of $ 10 million was paid to the holders of the series notes on september 11 , 2018 . substantially all of these early debt extinguishment costs were allocable to the company 2019s utility subsidiaries and recorded as regulatory assets , as the company believes they are probable of recovery in future rates . other regulatory assets include certain construction costs for treatment facilities , property tax stabilization , employee-related costs , deferred other postretirement benefit expense , business services project expenses , coastal water project costs , rate case expenditures and environmental remediation costs among others . these costs are deferred because the amounts are being recovered in rates or are probable of recovery through rates in future periods . regulatory liabilities regulatory liabilities generally represent amounts that are probable of being credited or refunded to customers through the rate-making process . also , if costs expected to be incurred in the future are currently being recovered through rates , the company records those expected future costs as regulatory liabilities . the following table provides the composition of regulatory liabilities as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>income taxes recovered through rates</td><td>$ 1279</td><td>$ 1242</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>removal costs recovered through rates</td><td>309</td><td>315</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>postretirement benefit liability</td><td>209</td><td>33</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>pension and other postretirement benefit balancing accounts</td><td>46</td><td>48</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>tcja reserve on revenue</td><td>36</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>28</td><td>26</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total regulatory liabilities</td><td>$ 1907</td><td>$ 1664</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in total regulatory liabilities from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: 243.0
Question: and what were those total regulatory liabilities in 2017?
Answer: 1664.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2017 amount?
| 0.14603 |
CONVFINQA5139 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 41 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced equity benchmark in the united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in dollars )</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jpmorgan chase</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 109.88</td><td>$ 119.07</td><td>$ 160.23</td><td>$ 203.07</td><td>$ 189.57</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100.00</td><td>109.36</td><td>109.90</td><td>141.23</td><td>167.49</td><td>137.82</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100.00</td><td>115.18</td><td>113.38</td><td>139.17</td><td>169.98</td><td>147.82</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>113.68</td><td>115.24</td><td>129.02</td><td>157.17</td><td>150.27</td></tr></table> december 31 , ( in dollars ) .
Question: in 2017, what was the performance price of the jpmorgan chase?
| 203.07 |
CONVFINQA5140 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 41 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced equity benchmark in the united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in dollars )</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jpmorgan chase</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 109.88</td><td>$ 119.07</td><td>$ 160.23</td><td>$ 203.07</td><td>$ 189.57</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100.00</td><td>109.36</td><td>109.90</td><td>141.23</td><td>167.49</td><td>137.82</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100.00</td><td>115.18</td><td>113.38</td><td>139.17</td><td>169.98</td><td>147.82</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>113.68</td><td>115.24</td><td>129.02</td><td>157.17</td><td>150.27</td></tr></table> december 31 , ( in dollars ) .
Question: in 2017, what was the performance price of the jpmorgan chase?
Answer: 203.07
Question: and what was it for the kbw bank index?
| 167.49 |
CONVFINQA5141 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 41 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced equity benchmark in the united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in dollars )</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jpmorgan chase</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 109.88</td><td>$ 119.07</td><td>$ 160.23</td><td>$ 203.07</td><td>$ 189.57</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100.00</td><td>109.36</td><td>109.90</td><td>141.23</td><td>167.49</td><td>137.82</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100.00</td><td>115.18</td><td>113.38</td><td>139.17</td><td>169.98</td><td>147.82</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>113.68</td><td>115.24</td><td>129.02</td><td>157.17</td><td>150.27</td></tr></table> december 31 , ( in dollars ) .
Question: in 2017, what was the performance price of the jpmorgan chase?
Answer: 203.07
Question: and what was it for the kbw bank index?
Answer: 167.49
Question: how much, then, did the jpmorgan performance represent in relation to this kbw bank index one?
| 1.21243 |
CONVFINQA5142 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 41 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced equity benchmark in the united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in dollars )</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jpmorgan chase</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 109.88</td><td>$ 119.07</td><td>$ 160.23</td><td>$ 203.07</td><td>$ 189.57</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100.00</td><td>109.36</td><td>109.90</td><td>141.23</td><td>167.49</td><td>137.82</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100.00</td><td>115.18</td><td>113.38</td><td>139.17</td><td>169.98</td><td>147.82</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>113.68</td><td>115.24</td><td>129.02</td><td>157.17</td><td>150.27</td></tr></table> december 31 , ( in dollars ) .
Question: in 2017, what was the performance price of the jpmorgan chase?
Answer: 203.07
Question: and what was it for the kbw bank index?
Answer: 167.49
Question: how much, then, did the jpmorgan performance represent in relation to this kbw bank index one?
Answer: 1.21243
Question: and what was the change in that performance price of the jpmorgan chase in the entire five year period?
| 1.8957 |
CONVFINQA5143 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 41 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced equity benchmark in the united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in dollars )</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jpmorgan chase</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 109.88</td><td>$ 119.07</td><td>$ 160.23</td><td>$ 203.07</td><td>$ 189.57</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100.00</td><td>109.36</td><td>109.90</td><td>141.23</td><td>167.49</td><td>137.82</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100.00</td><td>115.18</td><td>113.38</td><td>139.17</td><td>169.98</td><td>147.82</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>113.68</td><td>115.24</td><td>129.02</td><td>157.17</td><td>150.27</td></tr></table> december 31 , ( in dollars ) .
Question: in 2017, what was the performance price of the jpmorgan chase?
Answer: 203.07
Question: and what was it for the kbw bank index?
Answer: 167.49
Question: how much, then, did the jpmorgan performance represent in relation to this kbw bank index one?
Answer: 1.21243
Question: and what was the change in that performance price of the jpmorgan chase in the entire five year period?
Answer: 1.8957
Question: and how much does that performance price in 2018 represent in relation to this amount of years?
| 37.914 |
CONVFINQA5144 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
31 , 2015 , the price was r$ 218/mwh . after the expiration of contract with eletropaulo , tiet ea's strategy is to contract most of its physical guarantee , as described in regulatory framework section below , and sell the remaining portion in the spot market . tiet ea's strategy is reassessed from time to time according to changes in market conditions , hydrology and other factors . tiet ea has been continuously selling its available energy from 2016 forward through medium-term bilateral contracts of three to five years . as of december 31 , 2016 , tiet ea's contracted portfolio position is 95% ( 95 % ) and 88% ( 88 % ) with average prices of r$ 157/ mwh and r$ 159/mwh ( inflation adjusted until december 2016 ) for 2016 and 2017 , respectively . as brazil is mostly a hydro-based country with energy prices highly tied to the hydrological situation , the deterioration of the hydrology since the beginning of 2014 caused an increase in energy prices going forward . tiet ea is closely monitoring and analyzing system supply conditions to support energy commercialization decisions . under the concession agreement , tiet ea has an obligation to increase its capacity by 15% ( 15 % ) . tiet ea , as well as other concession generators , have not yet met this requirement due to regulatory , environmental , hydrological and fuel constraints . the state of s e3o paulo does not have a sufficient potential for wind power and only has a small remaining potential for hydro projects . as such , the capacity increases in the state will mostly be derived from thermal gas capacity projects . due to the highly complex process to obtain an environmental license for coal projects , tiet ea decided to fulfill its obligation with gas-fired projects in line with the federal government plans . petrobras refuses to supply natural gas and to offer capacity in its pipelines and regasification terminals . therefore , there are no regulations for natural gas swaps in place , and it is unfeasible to bring natural gas to aes tiet ea . a legal case has been initiated by the state of s e3o paulo requiring the investment to be performed . tiet ea is in the process of analyzing options to meet the obligation . uruguaiana is a 640 mw gas-fired combined cycle power plant located in the town of uruguaiana in the state of rio grande do sul , commissioned in december 2000 . aes manages and has a 46% ( 46 % ) economic interest in the plant with the remaining interest held by bndes . the plant's operations were suspended in april 2009 due to the unavailability of gas . aes has evaluated several alternatives to bring gas supply on a competitive basis to uruguaiana . one of the challenges is the capacity restrictions on the argentinean pipeline , especially during the winter season when gas demand in argentina is very high . the plant operated on a short-term basis during february and march 2013 , march through may 2014 , and february through may 2015 due to the short-term supply of lng for the facility . the plant did not operate in 2016 . uruguaiana continues to work toward securing gas on a long-term basis . market structure 2014 brazil has installed capacity of 150136 mw , which is 65% ( 65 % ) hydroelectric , 19% ( 19 % ) thermal and 16% ( 16 % ) renewable ( biomass and wind ) . brazil's national grid is divided into four subsystems . tiet ea is in the southeast and uruguaiana is in the south subsystems of the national grid . regulatory framework 2014 in brazil , the ministry of mines and energy determines the maximum amount of energy that a plant can sell , called physical guarantee , which represents the long-term average expected energy production of the plant . under current rules , physical guarantee can be sold to distribution companies through long- term regulated auctions or under unregulated bilateral contracts with large consumers or energy trading companies . the national system operator ( "ons" ) is responsible for coordinating and controlling the operation of the national grid . the ons dispatches generators based on hydrological conditions , reservoir levels , electricity demand and the prices of fuel and thermal generation . given the importance of hydro generation in the country , the ons sometimes reduces dispatch of hydro facilities and increases dispatch of thermal facilities to protect reservoir levels in the system . in brazil , the system operator controls all hydroelectric generation dispatch and reservoir levels . a mechanism known as the energy reallocation mechanism ( "mre" ) was created to share hydrological risk across mre hydro generators . if the hydro plants generate less than the total mre physical guarantee , the hydro generators may need to purchase energy in the short-term market to fulfill their contract obligations . when total hydro generation is higher than the total mre physical guarantee , the surplus is proportionally shared among its participants and they are able to make extra revenue selling the excess energy on the spot market . the consequences of unfavorable hydrology are ( i ) thermal plants more expensive to the system being dispatched , ( ii ) lower hydropower generation with deficits in the mre and ( iii ) high spot prices . aneel defines the spot price cap for electricity in the brazilian market . the spot price caps as defined by aneel and average spot prices by calendar year are as follows ( r$ / . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>spot price cap as defined by aneel</td><td>534</td><td>423</td><td>388</td><td>822</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average spot rate</td><td>-</td><td>94</td><td>287</td><td>689</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the average spot rate in 2015?
| 287.0 |
CONVFINQA5145 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
31 , 2015 , the price was r$ 218/mwh . after the expiration of contract with eletropaulo , tiet ea's strategy is to contract most of its physical guarantee , as described in regulatory framework section below , and sell the remaining portion in the spot market . tiet ea's strategy is reassessed from time to time according to changes in market conditions , hydrology and other factors . tiet ea has been continuously selling its available energy from 2016 forward through medium-term bilateral contracts of three to five years . as of december 31 , 2016 , tiet ea's contracted portfolio position is 95% ( 95 % ) and 88% ( 88 % ) with average prices of r$ 157/ mwh and r$ 159/mwh ( inflation adjusted until december 2016 ) for 2016 and 2017 , respectively . as brazil is mostly a hydro-based country with energy prices highly tied to the hydrological situation , the deterioration of the hydrology since the beginning of 2014 caused an increase in energy prices going forward . tiet ea is closely monitoring and analyzing system supply conditions to support energy commercialization decisions . under the concession agreement , tiet ea has an obligation to increase its capacity by 15% ( 15 % ) . tiet ea , as well as other concession generators , have not yet met this requirement due to regulatory , environmental , hydrological and fuel constraints . the state of s e3o paulo does not have a sufficient potential for wind power and only has a small remaining potential for hydro projects . as such , the capacity increases in the state will mostly be derived from thermal gas capacity projects . due to the highly complex process to obtain an environmental license for coal projects , tiet ea decided to fulfill its obligation with gas-fired projects in line with the federal government plans . petrobras refuses to supply natural gas and to offer capacity in its pipelines and regasification terminals . therefore , there are no regulations for natural gas swaps in place , and it is unfeasible to bring natural gas to aes tiet ea . a legal case has been initiated by the state of s e3o paulo requiring the investment to be performed . tiet ea is in the process of analyzing options to meet the obligation . uruguaiana is a 640 mw gas-fired combined cycle power plant located in the town of uruguaiana in the state of rio grande do sul , commissioned in december 2000 . aes manages and has a 46% ( 46 % ) economic interest in the plant with the remaining interest held by bndes . the plant's operations were suspended in april 2009 due to the unavailability of gas . aes has evaluated several alternatives to bring gas supply on a competitive basis to uruguaiana . one of the challenges is the capacity restrictions on the argentinean pipeline , especially during the winter season when gas demand in argentina is very high . the plant operated on a short-term basis during february and march 2013 , march through may 2014 , and february through may 2015 due to the short-term supply of lng for the facility . the plant did not operate in 2016 . uruguaiana continues to work toward securing gas on a long-term basis . market structure 2014 brazil has installed capacity of 150136 mw , which is 65% ( 65 % ) hydroelectric , 19% ( 19 % ) thermal and 16% ( 16 % ) renewable ( biomass and wind ) . brazil's national grid is divided into four subsystems . tiet ea is in the southeast and uruguaiana is in the south subsystems of the national grid . regulatory framework 2014 in brazil , the ministry of mines and energy determines the maximum amount of energy that a plant can sell , called physical guarantee , which represents the long-term average expected energy production of the plant . under current rules , physical guarantee can be sold to distribution companies through long- term regulated auctions or under unregulated bilateral contracts with large consumers or energy trading companies . the national system operator ( "ons" ) is responsible for coordinating and controlling the operation of the national grid . the ons dispatches generators based on hydrological conditions , reservoir levels , electricity demand and the prices of fuel and thermal generation . given the importance of hydro generation in the country , the ons sometimes reduces dispatch of hydro facilities and increases dispatch of thermal facilities to protect reservoir levels in the system . in brazil , the system operator controls all hydroelectric generation dispatch and reservoir levels . a mechanism known as the energy reallocation mechanism ( "mre" ) was created to share hydrological risk across mre hydro generators . if the hydro plants generate less than the total mre physical guarantee , the hydro generators may need to purchase energy in the short-term market to fulfill their contract obligations . when total hydro generation is higher than the total mre physical guarantee , the surplus is proportionally shared among its participants and they are able to make extra revenue selling the excess energy on the spot market . the consequences of unfavorable hydrology are ( i ) thermal plants more expensive to the system being dispatched , ( ii ) lower hydropower generation with deficits in the mre and ( iii ) high spot prices . aneel defines the spot price cap for electricity in the brazilian market . the spot price caps as defined by aneel and average spot prices by calendar year are as follows ( r$ / . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>spot price cap as defined by aneel</td><td>534</td><td>423</td><td>388</td><td>822</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average spot rate</td><td>-</td><td>94</td><td>287</td><td>689</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the average spot rate in 2015?
Answer: 287.0
Question: and for 2014?
| 689.0 |
CONVFINQA5146 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
31 , 2015 , the price was r$ 218/mwh . after the expiration of contract with eletropaulo , tiet ea's strategy is to contract most of its physical guarantee , as described in regulatory framework section below , and sell the remaining portion in the spot market . tiet ea's strategy is reassessed from time to time according to changes in market conditions , hydrology and other factors . tiet ea has been continuously selling its available energy from 2016 forward through medium-term bilateral contracts of three to five years . as of december 31 , 2016 , tiet ea's contracted portfolio position is 95% ( 95 % ) and 88% ( 88 % ) with average prices of r$ 157/ mwh and r$ 159/mwh ( inflation adjusted until december 2016 ) for 2016 and 2017 , respectively . as brazil is mostly a hydro-based country with energy prices highly tied to the hydrological situation , the deterioration of the hydrology since the beginning of 2014 caused an increase in energy prices going forward . tiet ea is closely monitoring and analyzing system supply conditions to support energy commercialization decisions . under the concession agreement , tiet ea has an obligation to increase its capacity by 15% ( 15 % ) . tiet ea , as well as other concession generators , have not yet met this requirement due to regulatory , environmental , hydrological and fuel constraints . the state of s e3o paulo does not have a sufficient potential for wind power and only has a small remaining potential for hydro projects . as such , the capacity increases in the state will mostly be derived from thermal gas capacity projects . due to the highly complex process to obtain an environmental license for coal projects , tiet ea decided to fulfill its obligation with gas-fired projects in line with the federal government plans . petrobras refuses to supply natural gas and to offer capacity in its pipelines and regasification terminals . therefore , there are no regulations for natural gas swaps in place , and it is unfeasible to bring natural gas to aes tiet ea . a legal case has been initiated by the state of s e3o paulo requiring the investment to be performed . tiet ea is in the process of analyzing options to meet the obligation . uruguaiana is a 640 mw gas-fired combined cycle power plant located in the town of uruguaiana in the state of rio grande do sul , commissioned in december 2000 . aes manages and has a 46% ( 46 % ) economic interest in the plant with the remaining interest held by bndes . the plant's operations were suspended in april 2009 due to the unavailability of gas . aes has evaluated several alternatives to bring gas supply on a competitive basis to uruguaiana . one of the challenges is the capacity restrictions on the argentinean pipeline , especially during the winter season when gas demand in argentina is very high . the plant operated on a short-term basis during february and march 2013 , march through may 2014 , and february through may 2015 due to the short-term supply of lng for the facility . the plant did not operate in 2016 . uruguaiana continues to work toward securing gas on a long-term basis . market structure 2014 brazil has installed capacity of 150136 mw , which is 65% ( 65 % ) hydroelectric , 19% ( 19 % ) thermal and 16% ( 16 % ) renewable ( biomass and wind ) . brazil's national grid is divided into four subsystems . tiet ea is in the southeast and uruguaiana is in the south subsystems of the national grid . regulatory framework 2014 in brazil , the ministry of mines and energy determines the maximum amount of energy that a plant can sell , called physical guarantee , which represents the long-term average expected energy production of the plant . under current rules , physical guarantee can be sold to distribution companies through long- term regulated auctions or under unregulated bilateral contracts with large consumers or energy trading companies . the national system operator ( "ons" ) is responsible for coordinating and controlling the operation of the national grid . the ons dispatches generators based on hydrological conditions , reservoir levels , electricity demand and the prices of fuel and thermal generation . given the importance of hydro generation in the country , the ons sometimes reduces dispatch of hydro facilities and increases dispatch of thermal facilities to protect reservoir levels in the system . in brazil , the system operator controls all hydroelectric generation dispatch and reservoir levels . a mechanism known as the energy reallocation mechanism ( "mre" ) was created to share hydrological risk across mre hydro generators . if the hydro plants generate less than the total mre physical guarantee , the hydro generators may need to purchase energy in the short-term market to fulfill their contract obligations . when total hydro generation is higher than the total mre physical guarantee , the surplus is proportionally shared among its participants and they are able to make extra revenue selling the excess energy on the spot market . the consequences of unfavorable hydrology are ( i ) thermal plants more expensive to the system being dispatched , ( ii ) lower hydropower generation with deficits in the mre and ( iii ) high spot prices . aneel defines the spot price cap for electricity in the brazilian market . the spot price caps as defined by aneel and average spot prices by calendar year are as follows ( r$ / . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>spot price cap as defined by aneel</td><td>534</td><td>423</td><td>388</td><td>822</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average spot rate</td><td>-</td><td>94</td><td>287</td><td>689</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the average spot rate in 2015?
Answer: 287.0
Question: and for 2014?
Answer: 689.0
Question: so what was the difference between these two values?
| -402.0 |
CONVFINQA5147 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
31 , 2015 , the price was r$ 218/mwh . after the expiration of contract with eletropaulo , tiet ea's strategy is to contract most of its physical guarantee , as described in regulatory framework section below , and sell the remaining portion in the spot market . tiet ea's strategy is reassessed from time to time according to changes in market conditions , hydrology and other factors . tiet ea has been continuously selling its available energy from 2016 forward through medium-term bilateral contracts of three to five years . as of december 31 , 2016 , tiet ea's contracted portfolio position is 95% ( 95 % ) and 88% ( 88 % ) with average prices of r$ 157/ mwh and r$ 159/mwh ( inflation adjusted until december 2016 ) for 2016 and 2017 , respectively . as brazil is mostly a hydro-based country with energy prices highly tied to the hydrological situation , the deterioration of the hydrology since the beginning of 2014 caused an increase in energy prices going forward . tiet ea is closely monitoring and analyzing system supply conditions to support energy commercialization decisions . under the concession agreement , tiet ea has an obligation to increase its capacity by 15% ( 15 % ) . tiet ea , as well as other concession generators , have not yet met this requirement due to regulatory , environmental , hydrological and fuel constraints . the state of s e3o paulo does not have a sufficient potential for wind power and only has a small remaining potential for hydro projects . as such , the capacity increases in the state will mostly be derived from thermal gas capacity projects . due to the highly complex process to obtain an environmental license for coal projects , tiet ea decided to fulfill its obligation with gas-fired projects in line with the federal government plans . petrobras refuses to supply natural gas and to offer capacity in its pipelines and regasification terminals . therefore , there are no regulations for natural gas swaps in place , and it is unfeasible to bring natural gas to aes tiet ea . a legal case has been initiated by the state of s e3o paulo requiring the investment to be performed . tiet ea is in the process of analyzing options to meet the obligation . uruguaiana is a 640 mw gas-fired combined cycle power plant located in the town of uruguaiana in the state of rio grande do sul , commissioned in december 2000 . aes manages and has a 46% ( 46 % ) economic interest in the plant with the remaining interest held by bndes . the plant's operations were suspended in april 2009 due to the unavailability of gas . aes has evaluated several alternatives to bring gas supply on a competitive basis to uruguaiana . one of the challenges is the capacity restrictions on the argentinean pipeline , especially during the winter season when gas demand in argentina is very high . the plant operated on a short-term basis during february and march 2013 , march through may 2014 , and february through may 2015 due to the short-term supply of lng for the facility . the plant did not operate in 2016 . uruguaiana continues to work toward securing gas on a long-term basis . market structure 2014 brazil has installed capacity of 150136 mw , which is 65% ( 65 % ) hydroelectric , 19% ( 19 % ) thermal and 16% ( 16 % ) renewable ( biomass and wind ) . brazil's national grid is divided into four subsystems . tiet ea is in the southeast and uruguaiana is in the south subsystems of the national grid . regulatory framework 2014 in brazil , the ministry of mines and energy determines the maximum amount of energy that a plant can sell , called physical guarantee , which represents the long-term average expected energy production of the plant . under current rules , physical guarantee can be sold to distribution companies through long- term regulated auctions or under unregulated bilateral contracts with large consumers or energy trading companies . the national system operator ( "ons" ) is responsible for coordinating and controlling the operation of the national grid . the ons dispatches generators based on hydrological conditions , reservoir levels , electricity demand and the prices of fuel and thermal generation . given the importance of hydro generation in the country , the ons sometimes reduces dispatch of hydro facilities and increases dispatch of thermal facilities to protect reservoir levels in the system . in brazil , the system operator controls all hydroelectric generation dispatch and reservoir levels . a mechanism known as the energy reallocation mechanism ( "mre" ) was created to share hydrological risk across mre hydro generators . if the hydro plants generate less than the total mre physical guarantee , the hydro generators may need to purchase energy in the short-term market to fulfill their contract obligations . when total hydro generation is higher than the total mre physical guarantee , the surplus is proportionally shared among its participants and they are able to make extra revenue selling the excess energy on the spot market . the consequences of unfavorable hydrology are ( i ) thermal plants more expensive to the system being dispatched , ( ii ) lower hydropower generation with deficits in the mre and ( iii ) high spot prices . aneel defines the spot price cap for electricity in the brazilian market . the spot price caps as defined by aneel and average spot prices by calendar year are as follows ( r$ / . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>spot price cap as defined by aneel</td><td>534</td><td>423</td><td>388</td><td>822</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average spot rate</td><td>-</td><td>94</td><td>287</td><td>689</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the average spot rate in 2015?
Answer: 287.0
Question: and for 2014?
Answer: 689.0
Question: so what was the difference between these two values?
Answer: -402.0
Question: and the percentage change?
| -0.58345 |
CONVFINQA5148 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) liquidity and capital resources snap-on 2019s growth has historically been funded by a combination of cash provided by operating activities and debt financing . snap-on believes that its cash from operations and collections of finance receivables , coupled with its sources of borrowings and available cash on hand , are sufficient to fund its currently anticipated requirements for scheduled debt payments ( including the march 2014 repayment of $ 100.0 million of 5.85% ( 5.85 % ) unsecured notes upon maturity ) , payments of interest and dividends , new receivables originated by our financial services businesses , capital expenditures , working capital , restructuring activities , the funding of pension plans , and funding for additional share repurchases and acquisitions , if any . due to snap-on 2019s credit rating over the years , external funds have been available at an acceptable cost . as of the close of business on february 7 , 2014 , snap-on 2019s long-term debt and commercial paper were rated , respectively , a3 and p-2 by moody 2019s investors service ; a- and a-2 by standard & poor 2019s ; and a- and f2 by fitch ratings . snap-on believes that its current credit arrangements are sound and that the strength of its balance sheet affords the company the financial flexibility to respond to both internal growth opportunities and those available through acquisitions . however , snap-on cannot provide any assurances of the availability of future financing or the terms on which it might be available , or that its debt ratings may not decrease . the following discussion focuses on information included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . as of 2013 year end , working capital ( current assets less current liabilities ) of $ 1080.8 million increased $ 1.0 million from $ 1079.8 million as of 2012 year end . the following represents the company 2019s working capital position as of 2013 and 2012 year end : ( amounts in millions ) 2013 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 217.6</td><td>$ 214.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trade and other accounts receivable 2013 net</td><td>531.6</td><td>497.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>finance receivables 2013 net</td><td>374.6</td><td>323.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>contract receivables 2013 net</td><td>68.4</td><td>62.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>inventories 2013 net</td><td>434.4</td><td>404.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other current assets</td><td>169.6</td><td>166.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total current assets</td><td>1796.2</td><td>1669.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-113.1 ( 113.1 )</td><td>-5.2 ( 5.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>-155.6 ( 155.6 )</td><td>-142.5 ( 142.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-446.7 ( 446.7 )</td><td>-441.5 ( 441.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total current liabilities</td><td>-715.4 ( 715.4 )</td><td>-589.2 ( 589.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 1080.8</td><td>$ 1079.8</td></tr></table> cash and cash equivalents of $ 217.6 million as of 2013 year end compared to cash and cash equivalents of $ 214.5 million at 2012 year end . the $ 3.1 million net increase in cash and cash equivalents includes the impacts of ( i ) $ 508.8 million of cash from collections of finance receivables ; ( ii ) $ 392.6 million of cash generated from operations , net of $ 24.3 million of discretionary cash contributions to the company 2019s pension plans ; ( iii ) $ 29.2 million of cash proceeds from stock purchase and option plan exercises ; and ( iv ) $ 8.4 million of cash proceeds from the sale of property and equipment . these increases in cash and cash equivalents were largely offset by ( i ) the funding of $ 651.3 million of new finance receivables ; ( ii ) dividend payments to shareholders of $ 92.0 million ; ( iii ) the repurchase of 926000 shares of the company 2019s common stock for $ 82.6 million ; ( iv ) the funding of $ 70.6 million of capital expenditures ; and ( v ) the may 2013 acquisition of challenger for a cash purchase price of $ 38.2 million . of the $ 217.6 million of cash and cash equivalents as of 2013 year end , $ 124.3 million was held outside of the united states . snap-on considers these non-u.s . funds as permanently invested in its foreign operations to ( i ) provide adequate working capital ; ( ii ) satisfy various regulatory requirements ; and/or ( iii ) take advantage of business expansion opportunities as they arise ; as such , the company does not presently expect to repatriate these funds to fund its u.s . operations or obligations . the repatriation of cash from certain foreign subsidiaries could have adverse net tax consequences on the company should snap-on be required to pay and record u.s . income taxes and foreign withholding taxes on funds that were previously considered permanently invested . alternatively , the repatriation of such cash from certain other foreign subsidiaries could result in favorable net tax consequences for the company . snap-on periodically evaluates opportunities to repatriate certain foreign cash amounts to the extent that it does not incur additional unfavorable net tax consequences . 46 snap-on incorporated .
Question: what was the balance of inventories in 2013?
| 434.4 |
CONVFINQA5149 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) liquidity and capital resources snap-on 2019s growth has historically been funded by a combination of cash provided by operating activities and debt financing . snap-on believes that its cash from operations and collections of finance receivables , coupled with its sources of borrowings and available cash on hand , are sufficient to fund its currently anticipated requirements for scheduled debt payments ( including the march 2014 repayment of $ 100.0 million of 5.85% ( 5.85 % ) unsecured notes upon maturity ) , payments of interest and dividends , new receivables originated by our financial services businesses , capital expenditures , working capital , restructuring activities , the funding of pension plans , and funding for additional share repurchases and acquisitions , if any . due to snap-on 2019s credit rating over the years , external funds have been available at an acceptable cost . as of the close of business on february 7 , 2014 , snap-on 2019s long-term debt and commercial paper were rated , respectively , a3 and p-2 by moody 2019s investors service ; a- and a-2 by standard & poor 2019s ; and a- and f2 by fitch ratings . snap-on believes that its current credit arrangements are sound and that the strength of its balance sheet affords the company the financial flexibility to respond to both internal growth opportunities and those available through acquisitions . however , snap-on cannot provide any assurances of the availability of future financing or the terms on which it might be available , or that its debt ratings may not decrease . the following discussion focuses on information included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . as of 2013 year end , working capital ( current assets less current liabilities ) of $ 1080.8 million increased $ 1.0 million from $ 1079.8 million as of 2012 year end . the following represents the company 2019s working capital position as of 2013 and 2012 year end : ( amounts in millions ) 2013 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 217.6</td><td>$ 214.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trade and other accounts receivable 2013 net</td><td>531.6</td><td>497.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>finance receivables 2013 net</td><td>374.6</td><td>323.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>contract receivables 2013 net</td><td>68.4</td><td>62.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>inventories 2013 net</td><td>434.4</td><td>404.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other current assets</td><td>169.6</td><td>166.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total current assets</td><td>1796.2</td><td>1669.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-113.1 ( 113.1 )</td><td>-5.2 ( 5.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>-155.6 ( 155.6 )</td><td>-142.5 ( 142.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-446.7 ( 446.7 )</td><td>-441.5 ( 441.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total current liabilities</td><td>-715.4 ( 715.4 )</td><td>-589.2 ( 589.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 1080.8</td><td>$ 1079.8</td></tr></table> cash and cash equivalents of $ 217.6 million as of 2013 year end compared to cash and cash equivalents of $ 214.5 million at 2012 year end . the $ 3.1 million net increase in cash and cash equivalents includes the impacts of ( i ) $ 508.8 million of cash from collections of finance receivables ; ( ii ) $ 392.6 million of cash generated from operations , net of $ 24.3 million of discretionary cash contributions to the company 2019s pension plans ; ( iii ) $ 29.2 million of cash proceeds from stock purchase and option plan exercises ; and ( iv ) $ 8.4 million of cash proceeds from the sale of property and equipment . these increases in cash and cash equivalents were largely offset by ( i ) the funding of $ 651.3 million of new finance receivables ; ( ii ) dividend payments to shareholders of $ 92.0 million ; ( iii ) the repurchase of 926000 shares of the company 2019s common stock for $ 82.6 million ; ( iv ) the funding of $ 70.6 million of capital expenditures ; and ( v ) the may 2013 acquisition of challenger for a cash purchase price of $ 38.2 million . of the $ 217.6 million of cash and cash equivalents as of 2013 year end , $ 124.3 million was held outside of the united states . snap-on considers these non-u.s . funds as permanently invested in its foreign operations to ( i ) provide adequate working capital ; ( ii ) satisfy various regulatory requirements ; and/or ( iii ) take advantage of business expansion opportunities as they arise ; as such , the company does not presently expect to repatriate these funds to fund its u.s . operations or obligations . the repatriation of cash from certain foreign subsidiaries could have adverse net tax consequences on the company should snap-on be required to pay and record u.s . income taxes and foreign withholding taxes on funds that were previously considered permanently invested . alternatively , the repatriation of such cash from certain other foreign subsidiaries could result in favorable net tax consequences for the company . snap-on periodically evaluates opportunities to repatriate certain foreign cash amounts to the extent that it does not incur additional unfavorable net tax consequences . 46 snap-on incorporated .
Question: what was the balance of inventories in 2013?
Answer: 434.4
Question: what is the balance in 2012?
| 404.2 |
CONVFINQA5150 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) liquidity and capital resources snap-on 2019s growth has historically been funded by a combination of cash provided by operating activities and debt financing . snap-on believes that its cash from operations and collections of finance receivables , coupled with its sources of borrowings and available cash on hand , are sufficient to fund its currently anticipated requirements for scheduled debt payments ( including the march 2014 repayment of $ 100.0 million of 5.85% ( 5.85 % ) unsecured notes upon maturity ) , payments of interest and dividends , new receivables originated by our financial services businesses , capital expenditures , working capital , restructuring activities , the funding of pension plans , and funding for additional share repurchases and acquisitions , if any . due to snap-on 2019s credit rating over the years , external funds have been available at an acceptable cost . as of the close of business on february 7 , 2014 , snap-on 2019s long-term debt and commercial paper were rated , respectively , a3 and p-2 by moody 2019s investors service ; a- and a-2 by standard & poor 2019s ; and a- and f2 by fitch ratings . snap-on believes that its current credit arrangements are sound and that the strength of its balance sheet affords the company the financial flexibility to respond to both internal growth opportunities and those available through acquisitions . however , snap-on cannot provide any assurances of the availability of future financing or the terms on which it might be available , or that its debt ratings may not decrease . the following discussion focuses on information included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . as of 2013 year end , working capital ( current assets less current liabilities ) of $ 1080.8 million increased $ 1.0 million from $ 1079.8 million as of 2012 year end . the following represents the company 2019s working capital position as of 2013 and 2012 year end : ( amounts in millions ) 2013 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 217.6</td><td>$ 214.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trade and other accounts receivable 2013 net</td><td>531.6</td><td>497.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>finance receivables 2013 net</td><td>374.6</td><td>323.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>contract receivables 2013 net</td><td>68.4</td><td>62.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>inventories 2013 net</td><td>434.4</td><td>404.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other current assets</td><td>169.6</td><td>166.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total current assets</td><td>1796.2</td><td>1669.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-113.1 ( 113.1 )</td><td>-5.2 ( 5.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>-155.6 ( 155.6 )</td><td>-142.5 ( 142.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-446.7 ( 446.7 )</td><td>-441.5 ( 441.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total current liabilities</td><td>-715.4 ( 715.4 )</td><td>-589.2 ( 589.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 1080.8</td><td>$ 1079.8</td></tr></table> cash and cash equivalents of $ 217.6 million as of 2013 year end compared to cash and cash equivalents of $ 214.5 million at 2012 year end . the $ 3.1 million net increase in cash and cash equivalents includes the impacts of ( i ) $ 508.8 million of cash from collections of finance receivables ; ( ii ) $ 392.6 million of cash generated from operations , net of $ 24.3 million of discretionary cash contributions to the company 2019s pension plans ; ( iii ) $ 29.2 million of cash proceeds from stock purchase and option plan exercises ; and ( iv ) $ 8.4 million of cash proceeds from the sale of property and equipment . these increases in cash and cash equivalents were largely offset by ( i ) the funding of $ 651.3 million of new finance receivables ; ( ii ) dividend payments to shareholders of $ 92.0 million ; ( iii ) the repurchase of 926000 shares of the company 2019s common stock for $ 82.6 million ; ( iv ) the funding of $ 70.6 million of capital expenditures ; and ( v ) the may 2013 acquisition of challenger for a cash purchase price of $ 38.2 million . of the $ 217.6 million of cash and cash equivalents as of 2013 year end , $ 124.3 million was held outside of the united states . snap-on considers these non-u.s . funds as permanently invested in its foreign operations to ( i ) provide adequate working capital ; ( ii ) satisfy various regulatory requirements ; and/or ( iii ) take advantage of business expansion opportunities as they arise ; as such , the company does not presently expect to repatriate these funds to fund its u.s . operations or obligations . the repatriation of cash from certain foreign subsidiaries could have adverse net tax consequences on the company should snap-on be required to pay and record u.s . income taxes and foreign withholding taxes on funds that were previously considered permanently invested . alternatively , the repatriation of such cash from certain other foreign subsidiaries could result in favorable net tax consequences for the company . snap-on periodically evaluates opportunities to repatriate certain foreign cash amounts to the extent that it does not incur additional unfavorable net tax consequences . 46 snap-on incorporated .
Question: what was the balance of inventories in 2013?
Answer: 434.4
Question: what is the balance in 2012?
Answer: 404.2
Question: what is the net change?
| 30.2 |
CONVFINQA5151 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) liquidity and capital resources snap-on 2019s growth has historically been funded by a combination of cash provided by operating activities and debt financing . snap-on believes that its cash from operations and collections of finance receivables , coupled with its sources of borrowings and available cash on hand , are sufficient to fund its currently anticipated requirements for scheduled debt payments ( including the march 2014 repayment of $ 100.0 million of 5.85% ( 5.85 % ) unsecured notes upon maturity ) , payments of interest and dividends , new receivables originated by our financial services businesses , capital expenditures , working capital , restructuring activities , the funding of pension plans , and funding for additional share repurchases and acquisitions , if any . due to snap-on 2019s credit rating over the years , external funds have been available at an acceptable cost . as of the close of business on february 7 , 2014 , snap-on 2019s long-term debt and commercial paper were rated , respectively , a3 and p-2 by moody 2019s investors service ; a- and a-2 by standard & poor 2019s ; and a- and f2 by fitch ratings . snap-on believes that its current credit arrangements are sound and that the strength of its balance sheet affords the company the financial flexibility to respond to both internal growth opportunities and those available through acquisitions . however , snap-on cannot provide any assurances of the availability of future financing or the terms on which it might be available , or that its debt ratings may not decrease . the following discussion focuses on information included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . as of 2013 year end , working capital ( current assets less current liabilities ) of $ 1080.8 million increased $ 1.0 million from $ 1079.8 million as of 2012 year end . the following represents the company 2019s working capital position as of 2013 and 2012 year end : ( amounts in millions ) 2013 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 217.6</td><td>$ 214.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trade and other accounts receivable 2013 net</td><td>531.6</td><td>497.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>finance receivables 2013 net</td><td>374.6</td><td>323.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>contract receivables 2013 net</td><td>68.4</td><td>62.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>inventories 2013 net</td><td>434.4</td><td>404.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other current assets</td><td>169.6</td><td>166.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total current assets</td><td>1796.2</td><td>1669.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-113.1 ( 113.1 )</td><td>-5.2 ( 5.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>-155.6 ( 155.6 )</td><td>-142.5 ( 142.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-446.7 ( 446.7 )</td><td>-441.5 ( 441.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total current liabilities</td><td>-715.4 ( 715.4 )</td><td>-589.2 ( 589.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 1080.8</td><td>$ 1079.8</td></tr></table> cash and cash equivalents of $ 217.6 million as of 2013 year end compared to cash and cash equivalents of $ 214.5 million at 2012 year end . the $ 3.1 million net increase in cash and cash equivalents includes the impacts of ( i ) $ 508.8 million of cash from collections of finance receivables ; ( ii ) $ 392.6 million of cash generated from operations , net of $ 24.3 million of discretionary cash contributions to the company 2019s pension plans ; ( iii ) $ 29.2 million of cash proceeds from stock purchase and option plan exercises ; and ( iv ) $ 8.4 million of cash proceeds from the sale of property and equipment . these increases in cash and cash equivalents were largely offset by ( i ) the funding of $ 651.3 million of new finance receivables ; ( ii ) dividend payments to shareholders of $ 92.0 million ; ( iii ) the repurchase of 926000 shares of the company 2019s common stock for $ 82.6 million ; ( iv ) the funding of $ 70.6 million of capital expenditures ; and ( v ) the may 2013 acquisition of challenger for a cash purchase price of $ 38.2 million . of the $ 217.6 million of cash and cash equivalents as of 2013 year end , $ 124.3 million was held outside of the united states . snap-on considers these non-u.s . funds as permanently invested in its foreign operations to ( i ) provide adequate working capital ; ( ii ) satisfy various regulatory requirements ; and/or ( iii ) take advantage of business expansion opportunities as they arise ; as such , the company does not presently expect to repatriate these funds to fund its u.s . operations or obligations . the repatriation of cash from certain foreign subsidiaries could have adverse net tax consequences on the company should snap-on be required to pay and record u.s . income taxes and foreign withholding taxes on funds that were previously considered permanently invested . alternatively , the repatriation of such cash from certain other foreign subsidiaries could result in favorable net tax consequences for the company . snap-on periodically evaluates opportunities to repatriate certain foreign cash amounts to the extent that it does not incur additional unfavorable net tax consequences . 46 snap-on incorporated .
Question: what was the balance of inventories in 2013?
Answer: 434.4
Question: what is the balance in 2012?
Answer: 404.2
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 30.2
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.07472 |
CONVFINQA5152 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements jpmorgan chase & co . 150 jpmorgan chase & co . / 2007 annual report expected loss modeling in 2006 , the firm restructured four multi-seller conduits that it administers . the restructurings included enhancing the firm 2019s expected loss model . in determining the primary beneficiary of the conduits it administers , the firm uses a monte carlo 2013based model to estimate the expected losses of each of the conduits and considers the rela- tive rights and obligations of each of the variable interest holders . the variability to be considered in the modeling of expected losses is based on the design of the entity . the firm 2019s traditional multi-seller conduits are designed to pass credit risk , not liquidity risk , to its vari- able interest holders , as the assets are intended to be held in the conduit for the longer term . under fin 46r , the firm is required to run the monte carlo-based expected loss model each time a reconsideration event occurs . in applying this guidance to the conduits , the following events are considered to be reconsideration events as they could affect the determination of the primary beneficiary of the conduits : 2022 new deals , including the issuance of new or additional variable interests ( credit support , liquidity facilities , etc ) ; 2022 changes in usage , including the change in the level of outstand- ing variable interests ( credit support , liquidity facilities , etc ) ; 2022 modifications of asset purchase agreements ; and 2022 sales of interests held by the primary beneficiary . from an operational perspective , the firm does not run its monte carlo-based expected loss model every time there is a reconsidera- tion event due to the frequency of their occurrence . instead , the firm runs its expected loss model each quarter and includes a growth assumption for each conduit to ensure that a sufficient amount of elns exists for each conduit at any point during the quarter . as part of its normal quarterly model review , the firm reassesses the underlying assumptions and inputs of the expected loss model . during the second half of 2007 , certain assumptions used in the model were adjusted to reflect the then current market conditions . specifically , risk ratings and loss given default assumptions relating to residential subprime mortgage exposures were modified . for other nonmortgage-related asset classes , the firm determined that the assumptions in the model required little adjustment . as a result of the updates to the model , during the fourth quarter of 2007 the terms of the elns were renegotiated to increase the level of commit- ment and funded amounts to be provided by the eln holders . the total amount of expected loss notes outstanding at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , were $ 130 million and $ 54 million , respectively . management concluded that the model assumptions used were reflective of market participant 2019s assumptions and appropriately considered the probability of a recurrence of recent market events . qualitative considerations the multi-seller conduits are primarily designed to provide an efficient means for clients to access the commercial paper market . the firm believes the conduits effectively disperse risk among all parties and that the preponderance of economic risk in the firm 2019s multi-seller conduits is not held by jpmorgan chase . the percentage of assets in the multi-seller conduits that the firm views as client-related represent 99% ( 99 % ) and 98% ( 98 % ) of the total conduits 2019 holdings at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . consolidated sensitivity analysis on capital it is possible that the firm could be required to consolidate a vie if it were determined that the firm became the primary beneficiary of the vie under the provisions of fin 46r . the factors involved in making the determination of whether or not a vie should be consolidated are dis- cussed above and in note 1 on page 108 of this annual report . the table below shows the impact on the firm 2019s reported assets , liabilities , net income , tier 1 capital ratio and tier 1 leverage ratio if the firm were required to consolidate all of the multi-seller conduits that it administers . as of or for the year ending december 31 , 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in billions except ratios )</td><td>reported</td><td>pro forma</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>assets</td><td>$ 1562.1</td><td>$ 1623.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liabilities</td><td>1438.9</td><td>1500.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income</td><td>15.4</td><td>15.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>tier 1 capital ratio</td><td>8.4% ( 8.4 % )</td><td>8.4% ( 8.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>tier 1 leverage ratio</td><td>6.0</td><td>5.8</td></tr></table> the firm could fund purchases of assets from vies should it become necessary . investor intermediation as a financial intermediary , the firm creates certain types of vies and also structures transactions , typically derivative structures , with these vies to meet investor needs . the firm may also provide liquidity and other support . the risks inherent in the derivative instruments or liq- uidity commitments are managed similarly to other credit , market or liquidity risks to which the firm is exposed . the principal types of vies for which the firm is engaged in these structuring activities are municipal bond vehicles , credit-linked note vehicles and collateralized debt obligation vehicles . municipal bond vehicles the firm has created a series of secondary market trusts that provide short-term investors with qualifying tax-exempt investments , and that allow investors in tax-exempt securities to finance their investments at short-term tax-exempt rates . in a typical transaction , the vehicle pur- chases fixed-rate longer-term highly rated municipal bonds and funds the purchase by issuing two types of securities : ( 1 ) putable floating- rate certificates and ( 2 ) inverse floating-rate residual interests ( 201cresid- ual interests 201d ) . the maturity of each of the putable floating-rate certifi- cates and the residual interests is equal to the life of the vehicle , while the maturity of the underlying municipal bonds is longer . holders of the putable floating-rate certificates may 201cput 201d , or tender , the certifi- cates if the remarketing agent cannot successfully remarket the float- ing-rate certificates to another investor . a liquidity facility conditionally obligates the liquidity provider to fund the purchase of the tendered floating-rate certificates . upon termination of the vehicle , if the pro- ceeds from the sale of the underlying municipal bonds are not suffi- cient to repay the liquidity facility , the liquidity provider has recourse either to excess collateralization in the vehicle or the residual interest holders for reimbursement . the third-party holders of the residual interests in these vehicles could experience losses if the face amount of the putable floating-rate cer- tificates exceeds the market value of the municipal bonds upon termi- nation of the vehicle . certain vehicles require a smaller initial invest- ment by the residual interest holders and thus do not result in excess collateralization . for these vehicles there exists a reimbursement obli- .
Question: in 2007, how much did the reported debt represent in relation to the total of assets?
| 0.92113 |
CONVFINQA5153 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements jpmorgan chase & co . 150 jpmorgan chase & co . / 2007 annual report expected loss modeling in 2006 , the firm restructured four multi-seller conduits that it administers . the restructurings included enhancing the firm 2019s expected loss model . in determining the primary beneficiary of the conduits it administers , the firm uses a monte carlo 2013based model to estimate the expected losses of each of the conduits and considers the rela- tive rights and obligations of each of the variable interest holders . the variability to be considered in the modeling of expected losses is based on the design of the entity . the firm 2019s traditional multi-seller conduits are designed to pass credit risk , not liquidity risk , to its vari- able interest holders , as the assets are intended to be held in the conduit for the longer term . under fin 46r , the firm is required to run the monte carlo-based expected loss model each time a reconsideration event occurs . in applying this guidance to the conduits , the following events are considered to be reconsideration events as they could affect the determination of the primary beneficiary of the conduits : 2022 new deals , including the issuance of new or additional variable interests ( credit support , liquidity facilities , etc ) ; 2022 changes in usage , including the change in the level of outstand- ing variable interests ( credit support , liquidity facilities , etc ) ; 2022 modifications of asset purchase agreements ; and 2022 sales of interests held by the primary beneficiary . from an operational perspective , the firm does not run its monte carlo-based expected loss model every time there is a reconsidera- tion event due to the frequency of their occurrence . instead , the firm runs its expected loss model each quarter and includes a growth assumption for each conduit to ensure that a sufficient amount of elns exists for each conduit at any point during the quarter . as part of its normal quarterly model review , the firm reassesses the underlying assumptions and inputs of the expected loss model . during the second half of 2007 , certain assumptions used in the model were adjusted to reflect the then current market conditions . specifically , risk ratings and loss given default assumptions relating to residential subprime mortgage exposures were modified . for other nonmortgage-related asset classes , the firm determined that the assumptions in the model required little adjustment . as a result of the updates to the model , during the fourth quarter of 2007 the terms of the elns were renegotiated to increase the level of commit- ment and funded amounts to be provided by the eln holders . the total amount of expected loss notes outstanding at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , were $ 130 million and $ 54 million , respectively . management concluded that the model assumptions used were reflective of market participant 2019s assumptions and appropriately considered the probability of a recurrence of recent market events . qualitative considerations the multi-seller conduits are primarily designed to provide an efficient means for clients to access the commercial paper market . the firm believes the conduits effectively disperse risk among all parties and that the preponderance of economic risk in the firm 2019s multi-seller conduits is not held by jpmorgan chase . the percentage of assets in the multi-seller conduits that the firm views as client-related represent 99% ( 99 % ) and 98% ( 98 % ) of the total conduits 2019 holdings at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . consolidated sensitivity analysis on capital it is possible that the firm could be required to consolidate a vie if it were determined that the firm became the primary beneficiary of the vie under the provisions of fin 46r . the factors involved in making the determination of whether or not a vie should be consolidated are dis- cussed above and in note 1 on page 108 of this annual report . the table below shows the impact on the firm 2019s reported assets , liabilities , net income , tier 1 capital ratio and tier 1 leverage ratio if the firm were required to consolidate all of the multi-seller conduits that it administers . as of or for the year ending december 31 , 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in billions except ratios )</td><td>reported</td><td>pro forma</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>assets</td><td>$ 1562.1</td><td>$ 1623.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liabilities</td><td>1438.9</td><td>1500.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income</td><td>15.4</td><td>15.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>tier 1 capital ratio</td><td>8.4% ( 8.4 % )</td><td>8.4% ( 8.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>tier 1 leverage ratio</td><td>6.0</td><td>5.8</td></tr></table> the firm could fund purchases of assets from vies should it become necessary . investor intermediation as a financial intermediary , the firm creates certain types of vies and also structures transactions , typically derivative structures , with these vies to meet investor needs . the firm may also provide liquidity and other support . the risks inherent in the derivative instruments or liq- uidity commitments are managed similarly to other credit , market or liquidity risks to which the firm is exposed . the principal types of vies for which the firm is engaged in these structuring activities are municipal bond vehicles , credit-linked note vehicles and collateralized debt obligation vehicles . municipal bond vehicles the firm has created a series of secondary market trusts that provide short-term investors with qualifying tax-exempt investments , and that allow investors in tax-exempt securities to finance their investments at short-term tax-exempt rates . in a typical transaction , the vehicle pur- chases fixed-rate longer-term highly rated municipal bonds and funds the purchase by issuing two types of securities : ( 1 ) putable floating- rate certificates and ( 2 ) inverse floating-rate residual interests ( 201cresid- ual interests 201d ) . the maturity of each of the putable floating-rate certifi- cates and the residual interests is equal to the life of the vehicle , while the maturity of the underlying municipal bonds is longer . holders of the putable floating-rate certificates may 201cput 201d , or tender , the certifi- cates if the remarketing agent cannot successfully remarket the float- ing-rate certificates to another investor . a liquidity facility conditionally obligates the liquidity provider to fund the purchase of the tendered floating-rate certificates . upon termination of the vehicle , if the pro- ceeds from the sale of the underlying municipal bonds are not suffi- cient to repay the liquidity facility , the liquidity provider has recourse either to excess collateralization in the vehicle or the residual interest holders for reimbursement . the third-party holders of the residual interests in these vehicles could experience losses if the face amount of the putable floating-rate cer- tificates exceeds the market value of the municipal bonds upon termi- nation of the vehicle . certain vehicles require a smaller initial invest- ment by the residual interest holders and thus do not result in excess collateralization . for these vehicles there exists a reimbursement obli- .
Question: in 2007, how much did the reported debt represent in relation to the total of assets?
Answer: 0.92113
Question: and what was the average of those assets for each of the firm's self sponsored conduits, in billions?
| 390.525 |
CONVFINQA5154 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents marketaxess holdings inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) of this standard had no material effect on the company 2019s consolidated statements of financial condition and consolidated statements of operations . reclassifications certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years 2019 financial statements in order to conform to the current year presentation . such reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income . on march 5 , 2008 , the company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of greenline financial technologies , inc . ( 201cgreenline 201d ) , an illinois-based provider of integration , testing and management solutions for fix-related products and services designed to optimize electronic trading of fixed-income , equity and other exchange-based products , and approximately ten percent of the outstanding capital stock of tradehelm , inc. , a delaware corporation that was spun-out from greenline immediately prior to the acquisition . the acquisition of greenline broadens the range of technology services that the company offers to institutional financial markets , provides an expansion of the company 2019s client base , including global exchanges and hedge funds , and further diversifies the company 2019s revenues beyond the core electronic credit trading products . the results of operations of greenline are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of the acquisition . the aggregate consideration for the greenline acquisition was $ 41.1 million , comprised of $ 34.7 million in cash , 725923 shares of common stock valued at $ 5.8 million and $ 0.6 million of acquisition-related costs . in addition , the sellers were eligible to receive up to an aggregate of $ 3.0 million in cash , subject to greenline attaining certain earn- out targets in 2008 and 2009 . a total of $ 1.4 million was paid to the sellers in 2009 based on the 2008 earn-out target , bringing the aggregate consideration to $ 42.4 million . the 2009 earn-out target was not met . a total of $ 2.0 million of the purchase price , which had been deposited into escrow accounts to satisfy potential indemnity claims , was distributed to the sellers in march 2009 . the shares of common stock issued to each selling shareholder of greenline were released in two equal installments on december 20 , 2008 and december 20 , 2009 , respectively . the value ascribed to the shares was discounted from the market value to reflect the non-marketability of such shares during the restriction period . the purchase price allocation is as follows ( in thousands ) : the amortizable intangibles include $ 3.2 million of acquired technology , $ 3.3 million of customer relationships , $ 1.3 million of non-competition agreements and $ 0.5 million of tradenames . useful lives of ten years and five years have been assigned to the customer relationships intangible and all other amortizable intangibles , respectively . the identifiable intangible assets and goodwill are not deductible for tax purposes . the following unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information reflects the results of operations of the company for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , as if the acquisition of greenline had occurred as of the beginning of the period presented , after giving effect to certain purchase accounting adjustments . these pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of what the company 2019s operating results would have been had the acquisition actually taken place as of the beginning of the earliest period presented . the pro forma financial information 3 . acquisitions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash</td><td>$ 6406</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts receivable</td><td>2139</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortizable intangibles</td><td>8330</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>goodwill</td><td>29405</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>deferred tax assets net</td><td>3410</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets including investment in tradehelm</td><td>1429</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accounts payable accrued expenses and deferred revenue</td><td>-8701 ( 8701 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total purchase price</td><td>$ 42418</td></tr></table> .
Question: in 2009, what percentage of the total aggregate consideration for the greenline acquisition was paid to the sellers based on the 2008 earn-out target?
| 0.03302 |
CONVFINQA5155 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents marketaxess holdings inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) of this standard had no material effect on the company 2019s consolidated statements of financial condition and consolidated statements of operations . reclassifications certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years 2019 financial statements in order to conform to the current year presentation . such reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income . on march 5 , 2008 , the company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of greenline financial technologies , inc . ( 201cgreenline 201d ) , an illinois-based provider of integration , testing and management solutions for fix-related products and services designed to optimize electronic trading of fixed-income , equity and other exchange-based products , and approximately ten percent of the outstanding capital stock of tradehelm , inc. , a delaware corporation that was spun-out from greenline immediately prior to the acquisition . the acquisition of greenline broadens the range of technology services that the company offers to institutional financial markets , provides an expansion of the company 2019s client base , including global exchanges and hedge funds , and further diversifies the company 2019s revenues beyond the core electronic credit trading products . the results of operations of greenline are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of the acquisition . the aggregate consideration for the greenline acquisition was $ 41.1 million , comprised of $ 34.7 million in cash , 725923 shares of common stock valued at $ 5.8 million and $ 0.6 million of acquisition-related costs . in addition , the sellers were eligible to receive up to an aggregate of $ 3.0 million in cash , subject to greenline attaining certain earn- out targets in 2008 and 2009 . a total of $ 1.4 million was paid to the sellers in 2009 based on the 2008 earn-out target , bringing the aggregate consideration to $ 42.4 million . the 2009 earn-out target was not met . a total of $ 2.0 million of the purchase price , which had been deposited into escrow accounts to satisfy potential indemnity claims , was distributed to the sellers in march 2009 . the shares of common stock issued to each selling shareholder of greenline were released in two equal installments on december 20 , 2008 and december 20 , 2009 , respectively . the value ascribed to the shares was discounted from the market value to reflect the non-marketability of such shares during the restriction period . the purchase price allocation is as follows ( in thousands ) : the amortizable intangibles include $ 3.2 million of acquired technology , $ 3.3 million of customer relationships , $ 1.3 million of non-competition agreements and $ 0.5 million of tradenames . useful lives of ten years and five years have been assigned to the customer relationships intangible and all other amortizable intangibles , respectively . the identifiable intangible assets and goodwill are not deductible for tax purposes . the following unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information reflects the results of operations of the company for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , as if the acquisition of greenline had occurred as of the beginning of the period presented , after giving effect to certain purchase accounting adjustments . these pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of what the company 2019s operating results would have been had the acquisition actually taken place as of the beginning of the earliest period presented . the pro forma financial information 3 . acquisitions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash</td><td>$ 6406</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts receivable</td><td>2139</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortizable intangibles</td><td>8330</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>goodwill</td><td>29405</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>deferred tax assets net</td><td>3410</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets including investment in tradehelm</td><td>1429</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accounts payable accrued expenses and deferred revenue</td><td>-8701 ( 8701 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total purchase price</td><td>$ 42418</td></tr></table> .
Question: in 2009, what percentage of the total aggregate consideration for the greenline acquisition was paid to the sellers based on the 2008 earn-out target?
Answer: 0.03302
Question: and what percentage of the purchase price was due to goodwill?
| 0.69322 |
CONVFINQA5156 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 4 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the company and implex had been operating since 2000 , the following table summarizes the estimated fair values relating to the development and distribution of reconstructive of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of implant and trauma products incorporating trabecular metal the implex acquisition : ( in millions ) technology . as ofthe merger agreement contains provisions for additional april 23 , 2004annual cash earn-out payments that are based on year-over- current assets $ 23.1year sales growth through 2006 of certain products that . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>as of april 23 2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>current assets</td><td>$ 23.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>property plant and equipment</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>intangible assets subject to amortization:</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>core technology ( 30 year useful life )</td><td>3.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>developed technology ( 30 year useful life )</td><td>103.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other assets</td><td>14.4</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>goodwill</td><td>61.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>210.5</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>14.1</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>deferred taxes</td><td>43.3</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total liabilities assumed</td><td>57.4</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 153.1</td></tr></table> estimates total earn-out payments , including payments core technology ( 30 year useful life ) 3.6 already made , to be in a range from $ 120 to $ 160 million . developed technology ( 30 year useful life ) 103.9 other assets 14.4these earn-out payments represent contingent consideration goodwill 61.0and , in accordance with sfas no . 141 and eitf 95-8 2018 2018accounting for contingent consideration paid to the total assets acquired 210.5 shareholders of an acquired enterprise in a purchase current liabilities 14.1 deferred taxes 43.3business combination 2019 2019 , are recorded as an additional cost of the transaction upon resolution of the contingency and total liabilities assumed 57.4 therefore increase goodwill . net assets acquired $ 153.1the implex acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting pursuant to sfas no . 141 . 4 . change in accounting principle accordingly , implex results of operations have been included in the company 2019s consolidated results of operations instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic subsequent to april 23 , 2004 , and its respective assets and surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical liabilities have been recorded at their estimated fair values in procedures . effective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are the company 2019s consolidated statement of financial position as recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , of april 23 , 2004 , with the excess purchase price being plant and equipment . undeployed instruments are carried at allocated to goodwill . pro forma financial information has not cost , net of allowances for obsolescence . instruments in the been included as the acquisition did not have a material field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation . impact upon the company 2019s financial position , results of depreciation is computed using the straight-line method operations or cash flows . based on average estimated useful lives , determined the company completed the preliminary purchase price principally in reference to associated product life cycles , allocation in accordance with u.s . generally accepted primarily five years . in accordance with sfas no . 144 , the accounting principles . the process included interviews with company reviews instruments for impairment whenever management , review of the economic and competitive events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying environment and examination of assets including historical value of an asset may not be recoverable . an impairment loss performance and future prospects . the preliminary purchase would be recognized when estimated future cash flows price allocation was based on information currently available relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount . to the company , and expectations and assumptions deemed depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general reasonable by the company 2019s management . no assurance can and administrative expense , consistent with the classification be given , however , that the underlying assumptions used to of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 . estimate expected technology based product revenues , prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were development costs or profitability , or the events associated carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for with such technology , will occur as projected . the final obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and purchase price allocation may vary from the preliminary recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in purchase price allocation . the final valuation and associated the year in which the instruments were placed into service . purchase price allocation is expected to be completed as the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted soon as possible , but no later than one year from the date of to recognize the cost of these important assets of the acquisition . to the extent that the estimates need to be company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet adjusted , the company will do so . and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the periods benefited , typically five years . the effect of the change during the year ended december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted share . the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the .
Question: what was the difference between total assets acquired and net assets acquired?
| 57.4 |
CONVFINQA5157 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 4 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the company and implex had been operating since 2000 , the following table summarizes the estimated fair values relating to the development and distribution of reconstructive of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of implant and trauma products incorporating trabecular metal the implex acquisition : ( in millions ) technology . as ofthe merger agreement contains provisions for additional april 23 , 2004annual cash earn-out payments that are based on year-over- current assets $ 23.1year sales growth through 2006 of certain products that . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>as of april 23 2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>current assets</td><td>$ 23.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>property plant and equipment</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>intangible assets subject to amortization:</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>core technology ( 30 year useful life )</td><td>3.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>developed technology ( 30 year useful life )</td><td>103.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other assets</td><td>14.4</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>goodwill</td><td>61.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>210.5</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>14.1</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>deferred taxes</td><td>43.3</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total liabilities assumed</td><td>57.4</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 153.1</td></tr></table> estimates total earn-out payments , including payments core technology ( 30 year useful life ) 3.6 already made , to be in a range from $ 120 to $ 160 million . developed technology ( 30 year useful life ) 103.9 other assets 14.4these earn-out payments represent contingent consideration goodwill 61.0and , in accordance with sfas no . 141 and eitf 95-8 2018 2018accounting for contingent consideration paid to the total assets acquired 210.5 shareholders of an acquired enterprise in a purchase current liabilities 14.1 deferred taxes 43.3business combination 2019 2019 , are recorded as an additional cost of the transaction upon resolution of the contingency and total liabilities assumed 57.4 therefore increase goodwill . net assets acquired $ 153.1the implex acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting pursuant to sfas no . 141 . 4 . change in accounting principle accordingly , implex results of operations have been included in the company 2019s consolidated results of operations instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic subsequent to april 23 , 2004 , and its respective assets and surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical liabilities have been recorded at their estimated fair values in procedures . effective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are the company 2019s consolidated statement of financial position as recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , of april 23 , 2004 , with the excess purchase price being plant and equipment . undeployed instruments are carried at allocated to goodwill . pro forma financial information has not cost , net of allowances for obsolescence . instruments in the been included as the acquisition did not have a material field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation . impact upon the company 2019s financial position , results of depreciation is computed using the straight-line method operations or cash flows . based on average estimated useful lives , determined the company completed the preliminary purchase price principally in reference to associated product life cycles , allocation in accordance with u.s . generally accepted primarily five years . in accordance with sfas no . 144 , the accounting principles . the process included interviews with company reviews instruments for impairment whenever management , review of the economic and competitive events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying environment and examination of assets including historical value of an asset may not be recoverable . an impairment loss performance and future prospects . the preliminary purchase would be recognized when estimated future cash flows price allocation was based on information currently available relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount . to the company , and expectations and assumptions deemed depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general reasonable by the company 2019s management . no assurance can and administrative expense , consistent with the classification be given , however , that the underlying assumptions used to of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 . estimate expected technology based product revenues , prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were development costs or profitability , or the events associated carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for with such technology , will occur as projected . the final obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and purchase price allocation may vary from the preliminary recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in purchase price allocation . the final valuation and associated the year in which the instruments were placed into service . purchase price allocation is expected to be completed as the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted soon as possible , but no later than one year from the date of to recognize the cost of these important assets of the acquisition . to the extent that the estimates need to be company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet adjusted , the company will do so . and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the periods benefited , typically five years . the effect of the change during the year ended december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted share . the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the .
Question: what was the difference between total assets acquired and net assets acquired?
Answer: 57.4
Question: so what was the percentage difference between these values?
| 0.37492 |
CONVFINQA5158 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 4 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the company and implex had been operating since 2000 , the following table summarizes the estimated fair values relating to the development and distribution of reconstructive of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of implant and trauma products incorporating trabecular metal the implex acquisition : ( in millions ) technology . as ofthe merger agreement contains provisions for additional april 23 , 2004annual cash earn-out payments that are based on year-over- current assets $ 23.1year sales growth through 2006 of certain products that . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>as of april 23 2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>current assets</td><td>$ 23.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>property plant and equipment</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>intangible assets subject to amortization:</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>core technology ( 30 year useful life )</td><td>3.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>developed technology ( 30 year useful life )</td><td>103.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other assets</td><td>14.4</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>goodwill</td><td>61.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>210.5</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>14.1</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>deferred taxes</td><td>43.3</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total liabilities assumed</td><td>57.4</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 153.1</td></tr></table> estimates total earn-out payments , including payments core technology ( 30 year useful life ) 3.6 already made , to be in a range from $ 120 to $ 160 million . developed technology ( 30 year useful life ) 103.9 other assets 14.4these earn-out payments represent contingent consideration goodwill 61.0and , in accordance with sfas no . 141 and eitf 95-8 2018 2018accounting for contingent consideration paid to the total assets acquired 210.5 shareholders of an acquired enterprise in a purchase current liabilities 14.1 deferred taxes 43.3business combination 2019 2019 , are recorded as an additional cost of the transaction upon resolution of the contingency and total liabilities assumed 57.4 therefore increase goodwill . net assets acquired $ 153.1the implex acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting pursuant to sfas no . 141 . 4 . change in accounting principle accordingly , implex results of operations have been included in the company 2019s consolidated results of operations instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic subsequent to april 23 , 2004 , and its respective assets and surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical liabilities have been recorded at their estimated fair values in procedures . effective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are the company 2019s consolidated statement of financial position as recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , of april 23 , 2004 , with the excess purchase price being plant and equipment . undeployed instruments are carried at allocated to goodwill . pro forma financial information has not cost , net of allowances for obsolescence . instruments in the been included as the acquisition did not have a material field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation . impact upon the company 2019s financial position , results of depreciation is computed using the straight-line method operations or cash flows . based on average estimated useful lives , determined the company completed the preliminary purchase price principally in reference to associated product life cycles , allocation in accordance with u.s . generally accepted primarily five years . in accordance with sfas no . 144 , the accounting principles . the process included interviews with company reviews instruments for impairment whenever management , review of the economic and competitive events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying environment and examination of assets including historical value of an asset may not be recoverable . an impairment loss performance and future prospects . the preliminary purchase would be recognized when estimated future cash flows price allocation was based on information currently available relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount . to the company , and expectations and assumptions deemed depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general reasonable by the company 2019s management . no assurance can and administrative expense , consistent with the classification be given , however , that the underlying assumptions used to of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 . estimate expected technology based product revenues , prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were development costs or profitability , or the events associated carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for with such technology , will occur as projected . the final obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and purchase price allocation may vary from the preliminary recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in purchase price allocation . the final valuation and associated the year in which the instruments were placed into service . purchase price allocation is expected to be completed as the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted soon as possible , but no later than one year from the date of to recognize the cost of these important assets of the acquisition . to the extent that the estimates need to be company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet adjusted , the company will do so . and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the periods benefited , typically five years . the effect of the change during the year ended december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted share . the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the .
Question: what was the difference between total assets acquired and net assets acquired?
Answer: 57.4
Question: so what was the percentage difference between these values?
Answer: 0.37492
Question: what was goodwill as a percentage of net assets acquired?
| 0.39843 |
CONVFINQA5159 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) our results of operations for the fiscal years ended september 30 , 2019 , 2018 and 2017 include share-based compensation expense of $ 64.2 million , $ 66.8 million and $ 60.9 million , respectively , including $ 2.9 million included in the gain on sale of hh&b in fiscal 2017 . share-based compensation expense in fiscal 2017 was reduced by $ 5.4 million for the rescission of shares granted to our ceo that were inadvertently granted in excess of plan limits in fiscal 2014 and 2015 . the total income tax benefit in the results of operations in connection with share-based compensation was $ 16.3 million , $ 19.4 million and $ 22.5 million , for the fiscal years ended september 30 , 2019 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . cash received from share-based payment arrangements for the fiscal years ended september 30 , 2019 , 2018 and 2017 was $ 61.5 million , $ 44.4 million and $ 59.2 million , respectively . equity awards issued in connection with acquisitions in connection with the kapstone acquisition , we replaced certain outstanding awards of restricted stock units granted under the kapstone long-term incentive plan with westrock stock options and restricted stock units . no additional shares will be granted under the kapstone plan . the kapstone equity awards were replaced with awards with identical terms utilizing an approximately 0.83 conversion factor as described in the merger agreement . the acquisition consideration included approximately $ 70.8 million related to outstanding kapstone equity awards related to service prior to the effective date of the kapstone acquisition 2013 the balance related to service after the effective date will be expensed over the remaining service period of the awards . as part of the kapstone acquisition , we issued 2665462 options that were valued at a weighted average fair value of $ 20.99 per share using the black-scholes option pricing model . the weighted average significant assumptions used were: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected term in years</td><td>3.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>27.7% ( 27.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td></tr></table> in connection with the mps acquisition , we replaced certain outstanding awards of restricted stock units granted under the mps long-term incentive plan with westrock restricted stock units . no additional shares will be granted under the mps plan . the mps equity awards were replaced with identical terms utilizing an approximately 0.33 conversion factor as described in the merger agreement . as part of the mps acquisition , we granted 119373 awards of restricted stock units , which contain service conditions and were valued at $ 54.24 per share . the acquisition consideration included approximately $ 1.9 million related to outstanding mps equity awards related to service prior to the effective date of the mps acquisition 2013 the balance related to service after the effective date will be expensed over the remaining service period of the awards . stock options and stock appreciation rights stock options granted under our plans generally have an exercise price equal to the closing market price on the date of the grant , generally vest in three years , in either one tranche or in approximately one-third increments , and have 10-year contractual terms . however , a portion of our grants are subject to earlier expense recognition due to retirement eligibility rules . presently , other than circumstances such as death , disability and retirement , grants will include a provision requiring both a change of control and termination of employment to accelerate vesting . at the date of grant , we estimate the fair value of stock options granted using a black-scholes option pricing model . we use historical data to estimate option exercises and employee terminations in determining the expected term in years for stock options . expected volatility is calculated based on the historical volatility of our stock . the risk-free interest rate is based on u.s . treasury securities in effect at the date of the grant of the stock options . the dividend yield is estimated based on our historic annual dividend payments and current expectations for the future . other than in connection with replacement awards in connection with acquisitions , we did not grant any stock options in fiscal 2019 , 2018 and 2017. .
Question: how many shares were issued as part of kapstone acquisition?
| 2665462.0 |
CONVFINQA5160 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) our results of operations for the fiscal years ended september 30 , 2019 , 2018 and 2017 include share-based compensation expense of $ 64.2 million , $ 66.8 million and $ 60.9 million , respectively , including $ 2.9 million included in the gain on sale of hh&b in fiscal 2017 . share-based compensation expense in fiscal 2017 was reduced by $ 5.4 million for the rescission of shares granted to our ceo that were inadvertently granted in excess of plan limits in fiscal 2014 and 2015 . the total income tax benefit in the results of operations in connection with share-based compensation was $ 16.3 million , $ 19.4 million and $ 22.5 million , for the fiscal years ended september 30 , 2019 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . cash received from share-based payment arrangements for the fiscal years ended september 30 , 2019 , 2018 and 2017 was $ 61.5 million , $ 44.4 million and $ 59.2 million , respectively . equity awards issued in connection with acquisitions in connection with the kapstone acquisition , we replaced certain outstanding awards of restricted stock units granted under the kapstone long-term incentive plan with westrock stock options and restricted stock units . no additional shares will be granted under the kapstone plan . the kapstone equity awards were replaced with awards with identical terms utilizing an approximately 0.83 conversion factor as described in the merger agreement . the acquisition consideration included approximately $ 70.8 million related to outstanding kapstone equity awards related to service prior to the effective date of the kapstone acquisition 2013 the balance related to service after the effective date will be expensed over the remaining service period of the awards . as part of the kapstone acquisition , we issued 2665462 options that were valued at a weighted average fair value of $ 20.99 per share using the black-scholes option pricing model . the weighted average significant assumptions used were: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected term in years</td><td>3.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>27.7% ( 27.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td></tr></table> in connection with the mps acquisition , we replaced certain outstanding awards of restricted stock units granted under the mps long-term incentive plan with westrock restricted stock units . no additional shares will be granted under the mps plan . the mps equity awards were replaced with identical terms utilizing an approximately 0.33 conversion factor as described in the merger agreement . as part of the mps acquisition , we granted 119373 awards of restricted stock units , which contain service conditions and were valued at $ 54.24 per share . the acquisition consideration included approximately $ 1.9 million related to outstanding mps equity awards related to service prior to the effective date of the mps acquisition 2013 the balance related to service after the effective date will be expensed over the remaining service period of the awards . stock options and stock appreciation rights stock options granted under our plans generally have an exercise price equal to the closing market price on the date of the grant , generally vest in three years , in either one tranche or in approximately one-third increments , and have 10-year contractual terms . however , a portion of our grants are subject to earlier expense recognition due to retirement eligibility rules . presently , other than circumstances such as death , disability and retirement , grants will include a provision requiring both a change of control and termination of employment to accelerate vesting . at the date of grant , we estimate the fair value of stock options granted using a black-scholes option pricing model . we use historical data to estimate option exercises and employee terminations in determining the expected term in years for stock options . expected volatility is calculated based on the historical volatility of our stock . the risk-free interest rate is based on u.s . treasury securities in effect at the date of the grant of the stock options . the dividend yield is estimated based on our historic annual dividend payments and current expectations for the future . other than in connection with replacement awards in connection with acquisitions , we did not grant any stock options in fiscal 2019 , 2018 and 2017. .
Question: how many shares were issued as part of kapstone acquisition?
Answer: 2665462.0
Question: what is the weighted average fair value per share?
| 20.99 |
CONVFINQA5161 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) our results of operations for the fiscal years ended september 30 , 2019 , 2018 and 2017 include share-based compensation expense of $ 64.2 million , $ 66.8 million and $ 60.9 million , respectively , including $ 2.9 million included in the gain on sale of hh&b in fiscal 2017 . share-based compensation expense in fiscal 2017 was reduced by $ 5.4 million for the rescission of shares granted to our ceo that were inadvertently granted in excess of plan limits in fiscal 2014 and 2015 . the total income tax benefit in the results of operations in connection with share-based compensation was $ 16.3 million , $ 19.4 million and $ 22.5 million , for the fiscal years ended september 30 , 2019 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . cash received from share-based payment arrangements for the fiscal years ended september 30 , 2019 , 2018 and 2017 was $ 61.5 million , $ 44.4 million and $ 59.2 million , respectively . equity awards issued in connection with acquisitions in connection with the kapstone acquisition , we replaced certain outstanding awards of restricted stock units granted under the kapstone long-term incentive plan with westrock stock options and restricted stock units . no additional shares will be granted under the kapstone plan . the kapstone equity awards were replaced with awards with identical terms utilizing an approximately 0.83 conversion factor as described in the merger agreement . the acquisition consideration included approximately $ 70.8 million related to outstanding kapstone equity awards related to service prior to the effective date of the kapstone acquisition 2013 the balance related to service after the effective date will be expensed over the remaining service period of the awards . as part of the kapstone acquisition , we issued 2665462 options that were valued at a weighted average fair value of $ 20.99 per share using the black-scholes option pricing model . the weighted average significant assumptions used were: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected term in years</td><td>3.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>27.7% ( 27.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td></tr></table> in connection with the mps acquisition , we replaced certain outstanding awards of restricted stock units granted under the mps long-term incentive plan with westrock restricted stock units . no additional shares will be granted under the mps plan . the mps equity awards were replaced with identical terms utilizing an approximately 0.33 conversion factor as described in the merger agreement . as part of the mps acquisition , we granted 119373 awards of restricted stock units , which contain service conditions and were valued at $ 54.24 per share . the acquisition consideration included approximately $ 1.9 million related to outstanding mps equity awards related to service prior to the effective date of the mps acquisition 2013 the balance related to service after the effective date will be expensed over the remaining service period of the awards . stock options and stock appreciation rights stock options granted under our plans generally have an exercise price equal to the closing market price on the date of the grant , generally vest in three years , in either one tranche or in approximately one-third increments , and have 10-year contractual terms . however , a portion of our grants are subject to earlier expense recognition due to retirement eligibility rules . presently , other than circumstances such as death , disability and retirement , grants will include a provision requiring both a change of control and termination of employment to accelerate vesting . at the date of grant , we estimate the fair value of stock options granted using a black-scholes option pricing model . we use historical data to estimate option exercises and employee terminations in determining the expected term in years for stock options . expected volatility is calculated based on the historical volatility of our stock . the risk-free interest rate is based on u.s . treasury securities in effect at the date of the grant of the stock options . the dividend yield is estimated based on our historic annual dividend payments and current expectations for the future . other than in connection with replacement awards in connection with acquisitions , we did not grant any stock options in fiscal 2019 , 2018 and 2017. .
Question: how many shares were issued as part of kapstone acquisition?
Answer: 2665462.0
Question: what is the weighted average fair value per share?
Answer: 20.99
Question: what is the total value of these issued shares?
| 55948047.38 |
CONVFINQA5162 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) our results of operations for the fiscal years ended september 30 , 2019 , 2018 and 2017 include share-based compensation expense of $ 64.2 million , $ 66.8 million and $ 60.9 million , respectively , including $ 2.9 million included in the gain on sale of hh&b in fiscal 2017 . share-based compensation expense in fiscal 2017 was reduced by $ 5.4 million for the rescission of shares granted to our ceo that were inadvertently granted in excess of plan limits in fiscal 2014 and 2015 . the total income tax benefit in the results of operations in connection with share-based compensation was $ 16.3 million , $ 19.4 million and $ 22.5 million , for the fiscal years ended september 30 , 2019 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . cash received from share-based payment arrangements for the fiscal years ended september 30 , 2019 , 2018 and 2017 was $ 61.5 million , $ 44.4 million and $ 59.2 million , respectively . equity awards issued in connection with acquisitions in connection with the kapstone acquisition , we replaced certain outstanding awards of restricted stock units granted under the kapstone long-term incentive plan with westrock stock options and restricted stock units . no additional shares will be granted under the kapstone plan . the kapstone equity awards were replaced with awards with identical terms utilizing an approximately 0.83 conversion factor as described in the merger agreement . the acquisition consideration included approximately $ 70.8 million related to outstanding kapstone equity awards related to service prior to the effective date of the kapstone acquisition 2013 the balance related to service after the effective date will be expensed over the remaining service period of the awards . as part of the kapstone acquisition , we issued 2665462 options that were valued at a weighted average fair value of $ 20.99 per share using the black-scholes option pricing model . the weighted average significant assumptions used were: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected term in years</td><td>3.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>27.7% ( 27.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>3.0% ( 3.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td></tr></table> in connection with the mps acquisition , we replaced certain outstanding awards of restricted stock units granted under the mps long-term incentive plan with westrock restricted stock units . no additional shares will be granted under the mps plan . the mps equity awards were replaced with identical terms utilizing an approximately 0.33 conversion factor as described in the merger agreement . as part of the mps acquisition , we granted 119373 awards of restricted stock units , which contain service conditions and were valued at $ 54.24 per share . the acquisition consideration included approximately $ 1.9 million related to outstanding mps equity awards related to service prior to the effective date of the mps acquisition 2013 the balance related to service after the effective date will be expensed over the remaining service period of the awards . stock options and stock appreciation rights stock options granted under our plans generally have an exercise price equal to the closing market price on the date of the grant , generally vest in three years , in either one tranche or in approximately one-third increments , and have 10-year contractual terms . however , a portion of our grants are subject to earlier expense recognition due to retirement eligibility rules . presently , other than circumstances such as death , disability and retirement , grants will include a provision requiring both a change of control and termination of employment to accelerate vesting . at the date of grant , we estimate the fair value of stock options granted using a black-scholes option pricing model . we use historical data to estimate option exercises and employee terminations in determining the expected term in years for stock options . expected volatility is calculated based on the historical volatility of our stock . the risk-free interest rate is based on u.s . treasury securities in effect at the date of the grant of the stock options . the dividend yield is estimated based on our historic annual dividend payments and current expectations for the future . other than in connection with replacement awards in connection with acquisitions , we did not grant any stock options in fiscal 2019 , 2018 and 2017. .
Question: how many shares were issued as part of kapstone acquisition?
Answer: 2665462.0
Question: what is the weighted average fair value per share?
Answer: 20.99
Question: what is the total value of these issued shares?
Answer: 55948047.38
Question: what about the total value of the restricted stock units?
| 6474791.52 |
CONVFINQA5163 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph compares the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2009 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31</td><td>citigroup</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>s&p financial index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>104.38</td><td>104.83</td><td>106.30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>124.02</td><td>121.20</td><td>126.41</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>70.36</td><td>127.85</td><td>103.47</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>18.71</td><td>81.12</td><td>47.36</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>9.26</td><td>102.15</td><td>55.27</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the value of an investment in citigroup in 2009?
| 9.26 |
CONVFINQA5164 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph compares the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2009 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31</td><td>citigroup</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>s&p financial index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>104.38</td><td>104.83</td><td>106.30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>124.02</td><td>121.20</td><td>126.41</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>70.36</td><td>127.85</td><td>103.47</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>18.71</td><td>81.12</td><td>47.36</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>9.26</td><td>102.15</td><td>55.27</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the value of an investment in citigroup in 2009?
Answer: 9.26
Question: what about the initial value of the investment?
| 100.0 |
CONVFINQA5165 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph compares the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2009 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31</td><td>citigroup</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>s&p financial index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>104.38</td><td>104.83</td><td>106.30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>124.02</td><td>121.20</td><td>126.41</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>70.36</td><td>127.85</td><td>103.47</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>18.71</td><td>81.12</td><td>47.36</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>9.26</td><td>102.15</td><td>55.27</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the value of an investment in citigroup in 2009?
Answer: 9.26
Question: what about the initial value of the investment?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what is the change in value?
| -90.74 |
CONVFINQA5166 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph compares the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2009 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31</td><td>citigroup</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>s&p financial index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>104.38</td><td>104.83</td><td>106.30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>124.02</td><td>121.20</td><td>126.41</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>70.36</td><td>127.85</td><td>103.47</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>18.71</td><td>81.12</td><td>47.36</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>9.26</td><td>102.15</td><td>55.27</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the value of an investment in citigroup in 2009?
Answer: 9.26
Question: what about the initial value of the investment?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what is the change in value?
Answer: -90.74
Question: what is the initial value of the investment?
| 100.0 |
CONVFINQA5167 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph compares the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2009 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31</td><td>citigroup</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>s&p financial index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>104.38</td><td>104.83</td><td>106.30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>124.02</td><td>121.20</td><td>126.41</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>70.36</td><td>127.85</td><td>103.47</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>18.71</td><td>81.12</td><td>47.36</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>9.26</td><td>102.15</td><td>55.27</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the value of an investment in citigroup in 2009?
Answer: 9.26
Question: what about the initial value of the investment?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what is the change in value?
Answer: -90.74
Question: what is the initial value of the investment?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what return rate does this represent?
| -0.9074 |
CONVFINQA5168 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
positions and collateral of the defaulting firm at each respective clearing organization , and taking into account any cross-margining loss sharing payments , any of the participating clearing organizations has a remaining liquidating surplus , and any other participating clearing organization has a remaining liquidating deficit , any additional surplus from the liquidation would be shared with the other clearing house to the extent that it has a remaining liquidating deficit . any remaining surplus funds would be passed to the bankruptcy trustee . mf global bankruptcy trust . the company provided a $ 550.0 million financial guarantee to the bankruptcy trustee of mf global to accelerate the distribution of funds to mf global customers . in the event that the trustee distributed more property in the second or third interim distributions than was permitted by the bankruptcy code and cftc regulations , the company will make a cash payment to the trustee for the amount of the erroneous distribution or distributions up to $ 550.0 million in the aggregate . a payment will only be made after the trustee makes reasonable efforts to collect the property erroneously distributed to the customer ( s ) . if a payment is made by the company , the company may have the right to seek reimbursement of the erroneously distributed property from the applicable customer ( s ) . the guarantee does not cover distributions made by the trustee to customers on the basis of their claims filed in the bankruptcy . because the trustee has now made payments to nearly all customers on the basis of their claims , the company believes that the likelihood of payment to the trustee is very remote . as a result , the guarantee liability is estimated to be immaterial at december 31 , 2012 . family farmer and rancher protection fund . in april 2012 , the company established the family farmer and rancher protection fund ( the fund ) . the fund is designed to provide payments , up to certain maximum levels , to family farmers , ranchers and other agricultural industry participants who use cme group agricultural products and who suffer losses to their segregated account balances due to their cme clearing member becoming insolvent . under the terms of the fund , farmers and ranchers are eligible for up to $ 25000 per participant . farming and ranching cooperatives are eligible for up to $ 100000 per cooperative . the fund has an aggregate maximum payment amount of $ 100.0 million . if payments to participants were to exceed this amount , payments would be pro-rated . clearing members and customers must register in advance with the company and provide certain documentation in order to substantiate their eligibility . peregrine financial group , inc . ( pfg ) filed for bankruptcy protection on july 10 , 2012 . pfg was not one of cme 2019s clearing members and its customers had not registered for the fund . accordingly , they were not technically eligible for payments from the fund . however , because the fund was newly implemented and because pfg 2019s customers included many agricultural industry participants for whom the program was designed , the company decided to waive certain terms and conditions of the fund , solely in connection with the pfg bankruptcy , so that otherwise eligible family farmers , ranchers and agricultural cooperatives could apply for and receive benefits from cme . based on the number of such pfg customers who applied and the estimated size of their claims , the company has recorded a liability in the amount of $ 2.1 million at december 31 , 2012 . 16 . redeemable non-controlling interest the following summarizes the changes in redeemable non-controlling interest for the years presented . non- controlling interests that do not contain redemption features are presented in the statements of equity. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 70.3</td><td>$ 68.1</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contribution by dow jones</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>675.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>distribution to dow jones</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-607.5 ( 607.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>allocation of stock-based compensation</td><td>2014</td><td>0.1</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest</td><td>10.5</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 80.8</td><td>$ 70.3</td><td>$ 68.1</td></tr></table> contribution by dow jones . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 675.0 distribution to dow jones . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 ( 607.5 ) allocation of stock- compensation . . . . 2014 0.1 2014 total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non- controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . 10.5 2.1 0.6 balance at december 31 . . . . . . . . . $ 80.8 $ 70.3 $ 68.1 .
Question: what is the net change in balance of non-controlling interests from 2011 to 2012?
| 10.5 |
CONVFINQA5169 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
positions and collateral of the defaulting firm at each respective clearing organization , and taking into account any cross-margining loss sharing payments , any of the participating clearing organizations has a remaining liquidating surplus , and any other participating clearing organization has a remaining liquidating deficit , any additional surplus from the liquidation would be shared with the other clearing house to the extent that it has a remaining liquidating deficit . any remaining surplus funds would be passed to the bankruptcy trustee . mf global bankruptcy trust . the company provided a $ 550.0 million financial guarantee to the bankruptcy trustee of mf global to accelerate the distribution of funds to mf global customers . in the event that the trustee distributed more property in the second or third interim distributions than was permitted by the bankruptcy code and cftc regulations , the company will make a cash payment to the trustee for the amount of the erroneous distribution or distributions up to $ 550.0 million in the aggregate . a payment will only be made after the trustee makes reasonable efforts to collect the property erroneously distributed to the customer ( s ) . if a payment is made by the company , the company may have the right to seek reimbursement of the erroneously distributed property from the applicable customer ( s ) . the guarantee does not cover distributions made by the trustee to customers on the basis of their claims filed in the bankruptcy . because the trustee has now made payments to nearly all customers on the basis of their claims , the company believes that the likelihood of payment to the trustee is very remote . as a result , the guarantee liability is estimated to be immaterial at december 31 , 2012 . family farmer and rancher protection fund . in april 2012 , the company established the family farmer and rancher protection fund ( the fund ) . the fund is designed to provide payments , up to certain maximum levels , to family farmers , ranchers and other agricultural industry participants who use cme group agricultural products and who suffer losses to their segregated account balances due to their cme clearing member becoming insolvent . under the terms of the fund , farmers and ranchers are eligible for up to $ 25000 per participant . farming and ranching cooperatives are eligible for up to $ 100000 per cooperative . the fund has an aggregate maximum payment amount of $ 100.0 million . if payments to participants were to exceed this amount , payments would be pro-rated . clearing members and customers must register in advance with the company and provide certain documentation in order to substantiate their eligibility . peregrine financial group , inc . ( pfg ) filed for bankruptcy protection on july 10 , 2012 . pfg was not one of cme 2019s clearing members and its customers had not registered for the fund . accordingly , they were not technically eligible for payments from the fund . however , because the fund was newly implemented and because pfg 2019s customers included many agricultural industry participants for whom the program was designed , the company decided to waive certain terms and conditions of the fund , solely in connection with the pfg bankruptcy , so that otherwise eligible family farmers , ranchers and agricultural cooperatives could apply for and receive benefits from cme . based on the number of such pfg customers who applied and the estimated size of their claims , the company has recorded a liability in the amount of $ 2.1 million at december 31 , 2012 . 16 . redeemable non-controlling interest the following summarizes the changes in redeemable non-controlling interest for the years presented . non- controlling interests that do not contain redemption features are presented in the statements of equity. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 70.3</td><td>$ 68.1</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contribution by dow jones</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>675.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>distribution to dow jones</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-607.5 ( 607.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>allocation of stock-based compensation</td><td>2014</td><td>0.1</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest</td><td>10.5</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 80.8</td><td>$ 70.3</td><td>$ 68.1</td></tr></table> contribution by dow jones . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 675.0 distribution to dow jones . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 ( 607.5 ) allocation of stock- compensation . . . . 2014 0.1 2014 total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non- controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . 10.5 2.1 0.6 balance at december 31 . . . . . . . . . $ 80.8 $ 70.3 $ 68.1 .
Question: what is the net change in balance of non-controlling interests from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 10.5
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.12995 |
CONVFINQA5170 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis results of reportable business segments net sales segment income ( millions ) 2008 2007 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions ) performance coatings</td><td>net sales 2008 $ 4716</td><td>2007 $ 3811</td><td>segment income 2008 $ 582</td><td>2007 $ 563</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>industrial coatings</td><td>3999</td><td>3646</td><td>212</td><td>370</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>architectural coatings 2013 emea</td><td>2249</td><td>2014</td><td>141</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>optical and specialty materials</td><td>1134</td><td>1029</td><td>244</td><td>235</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commodity chemicals</td><td>1837</td><td>1539</td><td>340</td><td>243</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>glass</td><td>1914</td><td>2195</td><td>70</td><td>138</td></tr></table> performance coatings sales increased $ 905 million or 24% ( 24 % ) in 2008 . sales increased 21% ( 21 % ) due to acquisitions , largely due to the impact of the sigmakalon protective and marine coatings business . sales also grew by 3% ( 3 % ) due to higher selling prices and 2% ( 2 % ) due to the positive impact of foreign currency translation . sales volumes declined 2% ( 2 % ) as reduced volumes in architectural coatings 2013 americas and asia pacific and automotive refinish were not fully offset by improved volumes in the aerospace and protective and marine businesses . volume growth in the aerospace businesses occurred throughout the world , while the volume growth in protective and marine coatings occurred primarily in asia . segment income increased $ 19 million in 2008 . factors increasing segment income were the positive impact of acquisitions , lower overhead costs and the positive impact of foreign currency translation . the benefit of higher selling prices more than offset the negative impact of inflation , including higher raw materials and benefit costs . segment income was reduced by the impact of the lower sales volumes in architectural coatings and automotive refinish , which more than offset the benefit of volume gains in the aerospace and protective and marine coatings businesses . industrial coatings sales increased $ 353 million or 10% ( 10 % ) in 2008 . sales increased 11% ( 11 % ) due to acquisitions , including the impact of the sigmakalon industrial coatings business . sales also grew 3% ( 3 % ) due to the positive impact of foreign currency translation , and 1% ( 1 % ) from higher selling prices . sales volumes declined 5% ( 5 % ) as reduced volumes were experienced in all three businesses , reflecting the substantial declines in global demand . volume declines in the automotive and industrial businesses were primarily in the u.s . and canada . additional volume declines in the european and asian regions were experienced by the industrial coatings business . in packaging coatings , volume declines in europe were only partially offset by gains in asia and north america . segment income declined $ 158 million in 2008 due to the lower volumes and inflation , including higher raw material and freight costs , the impact of which was only partially mitigated by the increased selling prices . segment income also declined due to higher selling and distribution costs , including higher bad debt expense . factors increasing segment income were the earnings of acquired businesses , the positive impact of foreign currency translation and lower manufacturing costs . architectural coatings - emea sales for the year were $ 2249 million . this business was acquired in the sigmakalon acquisition . segment income was $ 141 million , which included amortization expense of $ 63 million related to acquired intangible assets and depreciation expense of $ 58 million . optical and specialty materials sales increased $ 105 million or 10% ( 10 % ) in 2008 . sales increased 5% ( 5 % ) due to higher volumes in our optical products business resulting from the launch of transitions optical 2019s next generation lens product , 3% ( 3 % ) due to the positive impact of foreign currency translation and 2% ( 2 % ) due to increased selling prices . segment income increased $ 9 million in 2008 . the increase in segment income was the result of increased sales volumes and the favorable impact of currency partially offset by increased selling and marketing costs in the optical products business related to the transitions optical product launch mentioned above . increased selling prices only partially offset higher raw material costs , primarily in our silicas business . commodity chemicals sales increased $ 298 million or 19% ( 19 % ) in 2008 . sales increased 18% ( 18 % ) due to higher selling prices and 1% ( 1 % ) due to improved sales volumes . segment income increased $ 97 million in 2008 . segment income increased in large part due to higher selling prices , which more than offset the negative impact of inflation , primarily higher raw material and energy costs . segment income also improved due to lower manufacturing costs , while lower margin mix and equity earnings reduced segment income . glass sales decreased $ 281 million or 13% ( 13 % ) in 2008 . sales decreased 11% ( 11 % ) due to the divestiture of the automotive glass and services business in september 2008 and 4% ( 4 % ) due to lower sales volumes . sales increased 2% ( 2 % ) due to higher selling prices . segment income decreased $ 68 million in 2008 . segment income decreased due to the divestiture of the automotive glass and services business , lower volumes , the negative impact of inflation and lower equity earnings from our asian fiber glass joint ventures . factors increasing segment income were lower manufacturing costs , higher selling prices and stronger foreign currency . outlook overall global economic activity was volatile in 2008 with an overall downward trend . the north american economy continued a slowing trend which began during the second half of 2006 and continued all of 2007 . the impact of the weakening u.s . economy was particularly 2008 ppg annual report and form 10-k 17 .
Question: by what amount did the sales of glass increase due to higher selling prices?
| 43.9 |
CONVFINQA5171 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis results of reportable business segments net sales segment income ( millions ) 2008 2007 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions ) performance coatings</td><td>net sales 2008 $ 4716</td><td>2007 $ 3811</td><td>segment income 2008 $ 582</td><td>2007 $ 563</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>industrial coatings</td><td>3999</td><td>3646</td><td>212</td><td>370</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>architectural coatings 2013 emea</td><td>2249</td><td>2014</td><td>141</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>optical and specialty materials</td><td>1134</td><td>1029</td><td>244</td><td>235</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commodity chemicals</td><td>1837</td><td>1539</td><td>340</td><td>243</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>glass</td><td>1914</td><td>2195</td><td>70</td><td>138</td></tr></table> performance coatings sales increased $ 905 million or 24% ( 24 % ) in 2008 . sales increased 21% ( 21 % ) due to acquisitions , largely due to the impact of the sigmakalon protective and marine coatings business . sales also grew by 3% ( 3 % ) due to higher selling prices and 2% ( 2 % ) due to the positive impact of foreign currency translation . sales volumes declined 2% ( 2 % ) as reduced volumes in architectural coatings 2013 americas and asia pacific and automotive refinish were not fully offset by improved volumes in the aerospace and protective and marine businesses . volume growth in the aerospace businesses occurred throughout the world , while the volume growth in protective and marine coatings occurred primarily in asia . segment income increased $ 19 million in 2008 . factors increasing segment income were the positive impact of acquisitions , lower overhead costs and the positive impact of foreign currency translation . the benefit of higher selling prices more than offset the negative impact of inflation , including higher raw materials and benefit costs . segment income was reduced by the impact of the lower sales volumes in architectural coatings and automotive refinish , which more than offset the benefit of volume gains in the aerospace and protective and marine coatings businesses . industrial coatings sales increased $ 353 million or 10% ( 10 % ) in 2008 . sales increased 11% ( 11 % ) due to acquisitions , including the impact of the sigmakalon industrial coatings business . sales also grew 3% ( 3 % ) due to the positive impact of foreign currency translation , and 1% ( 1 % ) from higher selling prices . sales volumes declined 5% ( 5 % ) as reduced volumes were experienced in all three businesses , reflecting the substantial declines in global demand . volume declines in the automotive and industrial businesses were primarily in the u.s . and canada . additional volume declines in the european and asian regions were experienced by the industrial coatings business . in packaging coatings , volume declines in europe were only partially offset by gains in asia and north america . segment income declined $ 158 million in 2008 due to the lower volumes and inflation , including higher raw material and freight costs , the impact of which was only partially mitigated by the increased selling prices . segment income also declined due to higher selling and distribution costs , including higher bad debt expense . factors increasing segment income were the earnings of acquired businesses , the positive impact of foreign currency translation and lower manufacturing costs . architectural coatings - emea sales for the year were $ 2249 million . this business was acquired in the sigmakalon acquisition . segment income was $ 141 million , which included amortization expense of $ 63 million related to acquired intangible assets and depreciation expense of $ 58 million . optical and specialty materials sales increased $ 105 million or 10% ( 10 % ) in 2008 . sales increased 5% ( 5 % ) due to higher volumes in our optical products business resulting from the launch of transitions optical 2019s next generation lens product , 3% ( 3 % ) due to the positive impact of foreign currency translation and 2% ( 2 % ) due to increased selling prices . segment income increased $ 9 million in 2008 . the increase in segment income was the result of increased sales volumes and the favorable impact of currency partially offset by increased selling and marketing costs in the optical products business related to the transitions optical product launch mentioned above . increased selling prices only partially offset higher raw material costs , primarily in our silicas business . commodity chemicals sales increased $ 298 million or 19% ( 19 % ) in 2008 . sales increased 18% ( 18 % ) due to higher selling prices and 1% ( 1 % ) due to improved sales volumes . segment income increased $ 97 million in 2008 . segment income increased in large part due to higher selling prices , which more than offset the negative impact of inflation , primarily higher raw material and energy costs . segment income also improved due to lower manufacturing costs , while lower margin mix and equity earnings reduced segment income . glass sales decreased $ 281 million or 13% ( 13 % ) in 2008 . sales decreased 11% ( 11 % ) due to the divestiture of the automotive glass and services business in september 2008 and 4% ( 4 % ) due to lower sales volumes . sales increased 2% ( 2 % ) due to higher selling prices . segment income decreased $ 68 million in 2008 . segment income decreased due to the divestiture of the automotive glass and services business , lower volumes , the negative impact of inflation and lower equity earnings from our asian fiber glass joint ventures . factors increasing segment income were lower manufacturing costs , higher selling prices and stronger foreign currency . outlook overall global economic activity was volatile in 2008 with an overall downward trend . the north american economy continued a slowing trend which began during the second half of 2006 and continued all of 2007 . the impact of the weakening u.s . economy was particularly 2008 ppg annual report and form 10-k 17 .
Question: by what amount did the sales of glass increase due to higher selling prices?
Answer: 43.9
Question: and how much is that in dollars?
| 43900000.0 |
CONVFINQA5172 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
investments prior to our acquisition of keystone on october 12 , 2007 , we held common shares of keystone , which were classified as an available-for-sale investment security . accordingly , the investment was included in other assets at its fair value , with the unrealized gain excluded from earnings and included in accumulated other comprehensive income , net of applicable taxes . upon our acquisition of keystone on october 12 , 2007 , the unrealized gain was removed from accumulated other comprehensive income , net of applicable taxes , and the original cost of the common shares was considered a component of the purchase price . fair value of financial instruments our debt is reflected on the balance sheet at cost . based on current market conditions , our interest rate margins are below the rate available in the market , which causes the fair value of our debt to fall below the carrying value . the fair value of our term loans ( see note 6 , 201clong-term obligations 201d ) is approximately $ 570 million at december 31 , 2009 , as compared to the carrying value of $ 596 million . we estimated the fair value of our term loans by calculating the upfront cash payment a market participant would require to assume our obligations . the upfront cash payment , excluding any issuance costs , is the amount that a market participant would be able to lend at december 31 , 2009 to an entity with a credit rating similar to ours and achieve sufficient cash inflows to cover the scheduled cash outflows under our term loans . the carrying amounts of our cash and equivalents , net trade receivables and accounts payable approximate fair value . we apply the market approach to value our financial assets and liabilities , which include the cash surrender value of life insurance , deferred compensation liabilities and interest rate swaps . the market approach utilizes available market information to estimate fair value . required fair value disclosures are included in note 8 , 201cfair value measurements . 201d accrued expenses we self-insure a portion of employee medical benefits under the terms of our employee health insurance program . we purchase certain stop-loss insurance to limit our liability exposure . we also self-insure a portion of our property and casualty risk , which includes automobile liability , general liability , workers 2019 compensation and property under deductible insurance programs . the insurance premium costs are expensed over the contract periods . a reserve for liabilities associated with these losses is established for claims filed and claims incurred but not yet reported based upon our estimate of ultimate cost , which is calculated using analyses of historical data . we monitor new claims and claim development as well as trends related to the claims incurred but not reported in order to assess the adequacy of our insurance reserves . self-insurance reserves on the consolidated balance sheets are net of claims deposits of $ 0.7 million and $ 0.8 million , at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . while we do not expect the amounts ultimately paid to differ significantly from our estimates , our insurance reserves and corresponding expenses could be affected if future claim experience differs significantly from historical trends and assumptions . product warranties some of our mechanical products are sold with a standard six-month warranty against defects . we record the estimated warranty costs at the time of sale using historical warranty claim information to project future warranty claims activity and related expenses . the changes in the warranty reserve are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance as of january 1 2008</td><td>$ 580</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>warranty expense</td><td>3681</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>warranty claims</td><td>-3721 ( 3721 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance as of december 31 2008</td><td>540</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>warranty expense</td><td>5033</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>warranty claims</td><td>-4969 ( 4969 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 31 2009</td><td>$ 604</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the balance in the warranty reserves as of december 31, 2009?
| 604.0 |
CONVFINQA5173 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
investments prior to our acquisition of keystone on october 12 , 2007 , we held common shares of keystone , which were classified as an available-for-sale investment security . accordingly , the investment was included in other assets at its fair value , with the unrealized gain excluded from earnings and included in accumulated other comprehensive income , net of applicable taxes . upon our acquisition of keystone on october 12 , 2007 , the unrealized gain was removed from accumulated other comprehensive income , net of applicable taxes , and the original cost of the common shares was considered a component of the purchase price . fair value of financial instruments our debt is reflected on the balance sheet at cost . based on current market conditions , our interest rate margins are below the rate available in the market , which causes the fair value of our debt to fall below the carrying value . the fair value of our term loans ( see note 6 , 201clong-term obligations 201d ) is approximately $ 570 million at december 31 , 2009 , as compared to the carrying value of $ 596 million . we estimated the fair value of our term loans by calculating the upfront cash payment a market participant would require to assume our obligations . the upfront cash payment , excluding any issuance costs , is the amount that a market participant would be able to lend at december 31 , 2009 to an entity with a credit rating similar to ours and achieve sufficient cash inflows to cover the scheduled cash outflows under our term loans . the carrying amounts of our cash and equivalents , net trade receivables and accounts payable approximate fair value . we apply the market approach to value our financial assets and liabilities , which include the cash surrender value of life insurance , deferred compensation liabilities and interest rate swaps . the market approach utilizes available market information to estimate fair value . required fair value disclosures are included in note 8 , 201cfair value measurements . 201d accrued expenses we self-insure a portion of employee medical benefits under the terms of our employee health insurance program . we purchase certain stop-loss insurance to limit our liability exposure . we also self-insure a portion of our property and casualty risk , which includes automobile liability , general liability , workers 2019 compensation and property under deductible insurance programs . the insurance premium costs are expensed over the contract periods . a reserve for liabilities associated with these losses is established for claims filed and claims incurred but not yet reported based upon our estimate of ultimate cost , which is calculated using analyses of historical data . we monitor new claims and claim development as well as trends related to the claims incurred but not reported in order to assess the adequacy of our insurance reserves . self-insurance reserves on the consolidated balance sheets are net of claims deposits of $ 0.7 million and $ 0.8 million , at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . while we do not expect the amounts ultimately paid to differ significantly from our estimates , our insurance reserves and corresponding expenses could be affected if future claim experience differs significantly from historical trends and assumptions . product warranties some of our mechanical products are sold with a standard six-month warranty against defects . we record the estimated warranty costs at the time of sale using historical warranty claim information to project future warranty claims activity and related expenses . the changes in the warranty reserve are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance as of january 1 2008</td><td>$ 580</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>warranty expense</td><td>3681</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>warranty claims</td><td>-3721 ( 3721 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance as of december 31 2008</td><td>540</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>warranty expense</td><td>5033</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>warranty claims</td><td>-4969 ( 4969 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 31 2009</td><td>$ 604</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the balance in the warranty reserves as of december 31, 2009?
Answer: 604.0
Question: what about 2008?
| 540.0 |
CONVFINQA5174 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
investments prior to our acquisition of keystone on october 12 , 2007 , we held common shares of keystone , which were classified as an available-for-sale investment security . accordingly , the investment was included in other assets at its fair value , with the unrealized gain excluded from earnings and included in accumulated other comprehensive income , net of applicable taxes . upon our acquisition of keystone on october 12 , 2007 , the unrealized gain was removed from accumulated other comprehensive income , net of applicable taxes , and the original cost of the common shares was considered a component of the purchase price . fair value of financial instruments our debt is reflected on the balance sheet at cost . based on current market conditions , our interest rate margins are below the rate available in the market , which causes the fair value of our debt to fall below the carrying value . the fair value of our term loans ( see note 6 , 201clong-term obligations 201d ) is approximately $ 570 million at december 31 , 2009 , as compared to the carrying value of $ 596 million . we estimated the fair value of our term loans by calculating the upfront cash payment a market participant would require to assume our obligations . the upfront cash payment , excluding any issuance costs , is the amount that a market participant would be able to lend at december 31 , 2009 to an entity with a credit rating similar to ours and achieve sufficient cash inflows to cover the scheduled cash outflows under our term loans . the carrying amounts of our cash and equivalents , net trade receivables and accounts payable approximate fair value . we apply the market approach to value our financial assets and liabilities , which include the cash surrender value of life insurance , deferred compensation liabilities and interest rate swaps . the market approach utilizes available market information to estimate fair value . required fair value disclosures are included in note 8 , 201cfair value measurements . 201d accrued expenses we self-insure a portion of employee medical benefits under the terms of our employee health insurance program . we purchase certain stop-loss insurance to limit our liability exposure . we also self-insure a portion of our property and casualty risk , which includes automobile liability , general liability , workers 2019 compensation and property under deductible insurance programs . the insurance premium costs are expensed over the contract periods . a reserve for liabilities associated with these losses is established for claims filed and claims incurred but not yet reported based upon our estimate of ultimate cost , which is calculated using analyses of historical data . we monitor new claims and claim development as well as trends related to the claims incurred but not reported in order to assess the adequacy of our insurance reserves . self-insurance reserves on the consolidated balance sheets are net of claims deposits of $ 0.7 million and $ 0.8 million , at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . while we do not expect the amounts ultimately paid to differ significantly from our estimates , our insurance reserves and corresponding expenses could be affected if future claim experience differs significantly from historical trends and assumptions . product warranties some of our mechanical products are sold with a standard six-month warranty against defects . we record the estimated warranty costs at the time of sale using historical warranty claim information to project future warranty claims activity and related expenses . the changes in the warranty reserve are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance as of january 1 2008</td><td>$ 580</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>warranty expense</td><td>3681</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>warranty claims</td><td>-3721 ( 3721 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance as of december 31 2008</td><td>540</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>warranty expense</td><td>5033</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>warranty claims</td><td>-4969 ( 4969 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 31 2009</td><td>$ 604</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the balance in the warranty reserves as of december 31, 2009?
Answer: 604.0
Question: what about 2008?
Answer: 540.0
Question: what is the net change?
| 64.0 |
CONVFINQA5175 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
investments prior to our acquisition of keystone on october 12 , 2007 , we held common shares of keystone , which were classified as an available-for-sale investment security . accordingly , the investment was included in other assets at its fair value , with the unrealized gain excluded from earnings and included in accumulated other comprehensive income , net of applicable taxes . upon our acquisition of keystone on october 12 , 2007 , the unrealized gain was removed from accumulated other comprehensive income , net of applicable taxes , and the original cost of the common shares was considered a component of the purchase price . fair value of financial instruments our debt is reflected on the balance sheet at cost . based on current market conditions , our interest rate margins are below the rate available in the market , which causes the fair value of our debt to fall below the carrying value . the fair value of our term loans ( see note 6 , 201clong-term obligations 201d ) is approximately $ 570 million at december 31 , 2009 , as compared to the carrying value of $ 596 million . we estimated the fair value of our term loans by calculating the upfront cash payment a market participant would require to assume our obligations . the upfront cash payment , excluding any issuance costs , is the amount that a market participant would be able to lend at december 31 , 2009 to an entity with a credit rating similar to ours and achieve sufficient cash inflows to cover the scheduled cash outflows under our term loans . the carrying amounts of our cash and equivalents , net trade receivables and accounts payable approximate fair value . we apply the market approach to value our financial assets and liabilities , which include the cash surrender value of life insurance , deferred compensation liabilities and interest rate swaps . the market approach utilizes available market information to estimate fair value . required fair value disclosures are included in note 8 , 201cfair value measurements . 201d accrued expenses we self-insure a portion of employee medical benefits under the terms of our employee health insurance program . we purchase certain stop-loss insurance to limit our liability exposure . we also self-insure a portion of our property and casualty risk , which includes automobile liability , general liability , workers 2019 compensation and property under deductible insurance programs . the insurance premium costs are expensed over the contract periods . a reserve for liabilities associated with these losses is established for claims filed and claims incurred but not yet reported based upon our estimate of ultimate cost , which is calculated using analyses of historical data . we monitor new claims and claim development as well as trends related to the claims incurred but not reported in order to assess the adequacy of our insurance reserves . self-insurance reserves on the consolidated balance sheets are net of claims deposits of $ 0.7 million and $ 0.8 million , at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . while we do not expect the amounts ultimately paid to differ significantly from our estimates , our insurance reserves and corresponding expenses could be affected if future claim experience differs significantly from historical trends and assumptions . product warranties some of our mechanical products are sold with a standard six-month warranty against defects . we record the estimated warranty costs at the time of sale using historical warranty claim information to project future warranty claims activity and related expenses . the changes in the warranty reserve are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance as of january 1 2008</td><td>$ 580</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>warranty expense</td><td>3681</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>warranty claims</td><td>-3721 ( 3721 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance as of december 31 2008</td><td>540</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>warranty expense</td><td>5033</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>warranty claims</td><td>-4969 ( 4969 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 31 2009</td><td>$ 604</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the balance in the warranty reserves as of december 31, 2009?
Answer: 604.0
Question: what about 2008?
Answer: 540.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 64.0
Question: what is the balance in the warranty reserves as of december 31, 2008?
| 540.0 |
CONVFINQA5176 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
investments prior to our acquisition of keystone on october 12 , 2007 , we held common shares of keystone , which were classified as an available-for-sale investment security . accordingly , the investment was included in other assets at its fair value , with the unrealized gain excluded from earnings and included in accumulated other comprehensive income , net of applicable taxes . upon our acquisition of keystone on october 12 , 2007 , the unrealized gain was removed from accumulated other comprehensive income , net of applicable taxes , and the original cost of the common shares was considered a component of the purchase price . fair value of financial instruments our debt is reflected on the balance sheet at cost . based on current market conditions , our interest rate margins are below the rate available in the market , which causes the fair value of our debt to fall below the carrying value . the fair value of our term loans ( see note 6 , 201clong-term obligations 201d ) is approximately $ 570 million at december 31 , 2009 , as compared to the carrying value of $ 596 million . we estimated the fair value of our term loans by calculating the upfront cash payment a market participant would require to assume our obligations . the upfront cash payment , excluding any issuance costs , is the amount that a market participant would be able to lend at december 31 , 2009 to an entity with a credit rating similar to ours and achieve sufficient cash inflows to cover the scheduled cash outflows under our term loans . the carrying amounts of our cash and equivalents , net trade receivables and accounts payable approximate fair value . we apply the market approach to value our financial assets and liabilities , which include the cash surrender value of life insurance , deferred compensation liabilities and interest rate swaps . the market approach utilizes available market information to estimate fair value . required fair value disclosures are included in note 8 , 201cfair value measurements . 201d accrued expenses we self-insure a portion of employee medical benefits under the terms of our employee health insurance program . we purchase certain stop-loss insurance to limit our liability exposure . we also self-insure a portion of our property and casualty risk , which includes automobile liability , general liability , workers 2019 compensation and property under deductible insurance programs . the insurance premium costs are expensed over the contract periods . a reserve for liabilities associated with these losses is established for claims filed and claims incurred but not yet reported based upon our estimate of ultimate cost , which is calculated using analyses of historical data . we monitor new claims and claim development as well as trends related to the claims incurred but not reported in order to assess the adequacy of our insurance reserves . self-insurance reserves on the consolidated balance sheets are net of claims deposits of $ 0.7 million and $ 0.8 million , at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . while we do not expect the amounts ultimately paid to differ significantly from our estimates , our insurance reserves and corresponding expenses could be affected if future claim experience differs significantly from historical trends and assumptions . product warranties some of our mechanical products are sold with a standard six-month warranty against defects . we record the estimated warranty costs at the time of sale using historical warranty claim information to project future warranty claims activity and related expenses . the changes in the warranty reserve are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance as of january 1 2008</td><td>$ 580</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>warranty expense</td><td>3681</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>warranty claims</td><td>-3721 ( 3721 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance as of december 31 2008</td><td>540</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>warranty expense</td><td>5033</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>warranty claims</td><td>-4969 ( 4969 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 31 2009</td><td>$ 604</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the balance in the warranty reserves as of december 31, 2009?
Answer: 604.0
Question: what about 2008?
Answer: 540.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 64.0
Question: what is the balance in the warranty reserves as of december 31, 2008?
Answer: 540.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.11852 |
CONVFINQA5177 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis methodology of computing massachusetts state income taxes resulting from legislation passed in the third quarter 2008 , which resulted in an income tax benefit of approximately $ 18.8 million . these factors were partially offset by : income taxes recorded by entergy power generation , llc , prior to its liquidation , resulting from the redemption payments it received in connection with its investment in entergy nuclear power marketing , llc during the third quarter 2008 , which resulted in an income tax expense of approximately $ 16.1 million ; book and tax differences for utility plant items and state income taxes at the utility operating companies , including the flow-through treatment of the entergy arkansas write-offs discussed above . the effective income tax rate for 2007 was 30.7% ( 30.7 % ) . the reduction in the effective income tax rate versus the federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) in 2007 is primarily due to : a reduction in income tax expense due to a step-up in the tax basis on the indian point 2 non-qualified decommissioning trust fund resulting from restructuring of the trusts , which reduced deferred taxes on the trust fund and reduced current tax expense ; the resolution of tax audit issues involving the 2002-2003 audit cycle ; an adjustment to state income taxes for non-utility nuclear to reflect the effect of a change in the methodology of computing new york state income taxes as required by that state's taxing authority ; book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction ; and the amortization of investment tax credits . these factors were partially offset by book and tax differences for utility plant items and state income taxes at the utility operating companies . see note 3 to the financial statements for a reconciliation of the federal statutory rate of 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) to the effective income tax rates , and for additional discussion regarding income taxes . liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy's capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy's capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table . the decrease in the debt to capital percentage from 2008 to 2009 is primarily the result of an increase in shareholders' equity primarily due to an increase in retained earnings , partially offset by repurchases of common stock , along with a decrease in borrowings under entergy corporation's revolving credit facility . the increase in the debt to capital percentage from 2007 to 2008 is primarily the result of additional borrowings under entergy corporation's revolving credit facility. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net debt to net capital at the end of the year</td><td>53.5% ( 53.5 % )</td><td>55.6% ( 55.6 % )</td><td>54.7% ( 54.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of subtracting cash from debt</td><td>3.8% ( 3.8 % )</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt to capital at the end of the year</td><td>57.3% ( 57.3 % )</td><td>59.7% ( 59.7 % )</td><td>57.6% ( 57.6 % )</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in percentage points in debt-to-capital ratio from 2008 to 2009?
| -2.4 |
CONVFINQA5178 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis methodology of computing massachusetts state income taxes resulting from legislation passed in the third quarter 2008 , which resulted in an income tax benefit of approximately $ 18.8 million . these factors were partially offset by : income taxes recorded by entergy power generation , llc , prior to its liquidation , resulting from the redemption payments it received in connection with its investment in entergy nuclear power marketing , llc during the third quarter 2008 , which resulted in an income tax expense of approximately $ 16.1 million ; book and tax differences for utility plant items and state income taxes at the utility operating companies , including the flow-through treatment of the entergy arkansas write-offs discussed above . the effective income tax rate for 2007 was 30.7% ( 30.7 % ) . the reduction in the effective income tax rate versus the federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) in 2007 is primarily due to : a reduction in income tax expense due to a step-up in the tax basis on the indian point 2 non-qualified decommissioning trust fund resulting from restructuring of the trusts , which reduced deferred taxes on the trust fund and reduced current tax expense ; the resolution of tax audit issues involving the 2002-2003 audit cycle ; an adjustment to state income taxes for non-utility nuclear to reflect the effect of a change in the methodology of computing new york state income taxes as required by that state's taxing authority ; book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction ; and the amortization of investment tax credits . these factors were partially offset by book and tax differences for utility plant items and state income taxes at the utility operating companies . see note 3 to the financial statements for a reconciliation of the federal statutory rate of 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) to the effective income tax rates , and for additional discussion regarding income taxes . liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy's capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy's capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table . the decrease in the debt to capital percentage from 2008 to 2009 is primarily the result of an increase in shareholders' equity primarily due to an increase in retained earnings , partially offset by repurchases of common stock , along with a decrease in borrowings under entergy corporation's revolving credit facility . the increase in the debt to capital percentage from 2007 to 2008 is primarily the result of additional borrowings under entergy corporation's revolving credit facility. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net debt to net capital at the end of the year</td><td>53.5% ( 53.5 % )</td><td>55.6% ( 55.6 % )</td><td>54.7% ( 54.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of subtracting cash from debt</td><td>3.8% ( 3.8 % )</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt to capital at the end of the year</td><td>57.3% ( 57.3 % )</td><td>59.7% ( 59.7 % )</td><td>57.6% ( 57.6 % )</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in percentage points in debt-to-capital ratio from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: -2.4
Question: in that same period, what was that change for the net amounts of those values?
| -2.1 |
CONVFINQA5179 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis methodology of computing massachusetts state income taxes resulting from legislation passed in the third quarter 2008 , which resulted in an income tax benefit of approximately $ 18.8 million . these factors were partially offset by : income taxes recorded by entergy power generation , llc , prior to its liquidation , resulting from the redemption payments it received in connection with its investment in entergy nuclear power marketing , llc during the third quarter 2008 , which resulted in an income tax expense of approximately $ 16.1 million ; book and tax differences for utility plant items and state income taxes at the utility operating companies , including the flow-through treatment of the entergy arkansas write-offs discussed above . the effective income tax rate for 2007 was 30.7% ( 30.7 % ) . the reduction in the effective income tax rate versus the federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) in 2007 is primarily due to : a reduction in income tax expense due to a step-up in the tax basis on the indian point 2 non-qualified decommissioning trust fund resulting from restructuring of the trusts , which reduced deferred taxes on the trust fund and reduced current tax expense ; the resolution of tax audit issues involving the 2002-2003 audit cycle ; an adjustment to state income taxes for non-utility nuclear to reflect the effect of a change in the methodology of computing new york state income taxes as required by that state's taxing authority ; book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction ; and the amortization of investment tax credits . these factors were partially offset by book and tax differences for utility plant items and state income taxes at the utility operating companies . see note 3 to the financial statements for a reconciliation of the federal statutory rate of 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) to the effective income tax rates , and for additional discussion regarding income taxes . liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy's capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy's capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table . the decrease in the debt to capital percentage from 2008 to 2009 is primarily the result of an increase in shareholders' equity primarily due to an increase in retained earnings , partially offset by repurchases of common stock , along with a decrease in borrowings under entergy corporation's revolving credit facility . the increase in the debt to capital percentage from 2007 to 2008 is primarily the result of additional borrowings under entergy corporation's revolving credit facility. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net debt to net capital at the end of the year</td><td>53.5% ( 53.5 % )</td><td>55.6% ( 55.6 % )</td><td>54.7% ( 54.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of subtracting cash from debt</td><td>3.8% ( 3.8 % )</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt to capital at the end of the year</td><td>57.3% ( 57.3 % )</td><td>59.7% ( 59.7 % )</td><td>57.6% ( 57.6 % )</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in percentage points in debt-to-capital ratio from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: -2.4
Question: in that same period, what was that change for the net amounts of those values?
Answer: -2.1
Question: and what is this change as a portion of that net debt to net capital ratio in 2009?
| -0.03777 |
CONVFINQA5180 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2013 and 2012 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 160468</td><td>$ 163607</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions</td><td>20244</td><td>1038</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions</td><td>16777</td><td>23771</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-55851 ( 55851 )</td><td>-1754 ( 1754 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-4066 ( 4066 )</td><td>-25387 ( 25387 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>foreign exchange gains and losses</td><td>-1474 ( 1474 )</td><td>-807 ( 807 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 136098</td><td>$ 160468</td></tr></table> as of november 29 , 2013 , the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns and included in non-current income taxes payable was approximately $ 11.4 million . we file income tax returns in the u.s . on a federal basis and in many u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities . our major tax jurisdictions are the u.s. , ireland and california . for california , ireland and the u.s. , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2005 , 2006 and 2010 , respectively . we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from the current examinations . we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position . in july 2013 , a u.s . income tax examination covering our fiscal years 2008 and 2009 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was $ 48.4 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we settled the tax obligation resulting from this examination with cash and income tax assets totaling $ 41.2 million , and the resulting $ 7.2 million income tax benefit was recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 . the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process . these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet classification of current and non-current assets and liabilities . we believe that within the next 12 months , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both . given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential decreases in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 5 million . note 10 . restructuring fiscal 2011 restructuring plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 , we initiated a restructuring plan consisting of reductions in workforce and the consolidation of facilities in order to better align our resources around our digital media and digital marketing strategies . during fiscal 2013 , we continued to implement restructuring activities under this plan . total costs incurred to date and expected to be incurred for closing redundant facilities are $ 12.2 million as all facilities under this plan have been exited as of november 29 , 2013 . other restructuring plans other restructuring plans include other adobe plans and other plans associated with certain of our acquisitions that are substantially complete . we continue to make cash outlays to settle obligations under these plans , however the current impact to our consolidated financial statements is not significant . our other restructuring plans primarily consist of the 2009 restructuring plan , which was implemented in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 , in order to appropriately align our costs in connection with our fiscal 2010 operating plan. .
Question: what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits from 2012 to 2013?
| -24370.0 |
CONVFINQA5181 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2013 and 2012 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 160468</td><td>$ 163607</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions</td><td>20244</td><td>1038</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions</td><td>16777</td><td>23771</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-55851 ( 55851 )</td><td>-1754 ( 1754 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-4066 ( 4066 )</td><td>-25387 ( 25387 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>foreign exchange gains and losses</td><td>-1474 ( 1474 )</td><td>-807 ( 807 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 136098</td><td>$ 160468</td></tr></table> as of november 29 , 2013 , the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns and included in non-current income taxes payable was approximately $ 11.4 million . we file income tax returns in the u.s . on a federal basis and in many u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities . our major tax jurisdictions are the u.s. , ireland and california . for california , ireland and the u.s. , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2005 , 2006 and 2010 , respectively . we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from the current examinations . we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position . in july 2013 , a u.s . income tax examination covering our fiscal years 2008 and 2009 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was $ 48.4 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we settled the tax obligation resulting from this examination with cash and income tax assets totaling $ 41.2 million , and the resulting $ 7.2 million income tax benefit was recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 . the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process . these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet classification of current and non-current assets and liabilities . we believe that within the next 12 months , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both . given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential decreases in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 5 million . note 10 . restructuring fiscal 2011 restructuring plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 , we initiated a restructuring plan consisting of reductions in workforce and the consolidation of facilities in order to better align our resources around our digital media and digital marketing strategies . during fiscal 2013 , we continued to implement restructuring activities under this plan . total costs incurred to date and expected to be incurred for closing redundant facilities are $ 12.2 million as all facilities under this plan have been exited as of november 29 , 2013 . other restructuring plans other restructuring plans include other adobe plans and other plans associated with certain of our acquisitions that are substantially complete . we continue to make cash outlays to settle obligations under these plans , however the current impact to our consolidated financial statements is not significant . our other restructuring plans primarily consist of the 2009 restructuring plan , which was implemented in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 , in order to appropriately align our costs in connection with our fiscal 2010 operating plan. .
Question: what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: -24370.0
Question: what about the balance of unrecognized tax benefits in 2012?
| 160468.0 |
CONVFINQA5182 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2013 and 2012 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 160468</td><td>$ 163607</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions</td><td>20244</td><td>1038</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions</td><td>16777</td><td>23771</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-55851 ( 55851 )</td><td>-1754 ( 1754 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-4066 ( 4066 )</td><td>-25387 ( 25387 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>foreign exchange gains and losses</td><td>-1474 ( 1474 )</td><td>-807 ( 807 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 136098</td><td>$ 160468</td></tr></table> as of november 29 , 2013 , the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns and included in non-current income taxes payable was approximately $ 11.4 million . we file income tax returns in the u.s . on a federal basis and in many u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities . our major tax jurisdictions are the u.s. , ireland and california . for california , ireland and the u.s. , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2005 , 2006 and 2010 , respectively . we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from the current examinations . we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position . in july 2013 , a u.s . income tax examination covering our fiscal years 2008 and 2009 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was $ 48.4 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we settled the tax obligation resulting from this examination with cash and income tax assets totaling $ 41.2 million , and the resulting $ 7.2 million income tax benefit was recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 . the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process . these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet classification of current and non-current assets and liabilities . we believe that within the next 12 months , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both . given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential decreases in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 5 million . note 10 . restructuring fiscal 2011 restructuring plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 , we initiated a restructuring plan consisting of reductions in workforce and the consolidation of facilities in order to better align our resources around our digital media and digital marketing strategies . during fiscal 2013 , we continued to implement restructuring activities under this plan . total costs incurred to date and expected to be incurred for closing redundant facilities are $ 12.2 million as all facilities under this plan have been exited as of november 29 , 2013 . other restructuring plans other restructuring plans include other adobe plans and other plans associated with certain of our acquisitions that are substantially complete . we continue to make cash outlays to settle obligations under these plans , however the current impact to our consolidated financial statements is not significant . our other restructuring plans primarily consist of the 2009 restructuring plan , which was implemented in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 , in order to appropriately align our costs in connection with our fiscal 2010 operating plan. .
Question: what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: -24370.0
Question: what about the balance of unrecognized tax benefits in 2012?
Answer: 160468.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| -0.15187 |
CONVFINQA5183 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
eog utilized average prices per acre from comparable market transactions and estimated discounted cash flows as the basis for determining the fair value of unproved and proved properties , respectively , received in non-cash property exchanges . see note 10 . fair value of debt . at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , eog had outstanding $ 6040 million and $ 6390 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes , which had estimated fair values of approximately $ 6027 million and $ 6602 million , respectively . the estimated fair value of debt was based upon quoted market prices and , where such prices were not available , other observable ( level 2 ) inputs regarding interest rates available to eog at year-end . 14 . accounting for certain long-lived assets eog reviews its proved oil and gas properties for impairment purposes by comparing the expected undiscounted future cash flows at a depreciation , depletion and amortization group level to the unamortized capitalized cost of the asset . the carrying values for assets determined to be impaired were adjusted to estimated fair value using the income approach described in the fair value measurement topic of the asc . in certain instances , eog utilizes accepted offers from third-party purchasers as the basis for determining fair value . during 2018 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 139 million were written down to their fair value of $ 18 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 121 million . during 2017 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 370 million were written down to their fair value of $ 146 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 224 million . impairments in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 included domestic legacy natural gas assets . amortization and impairments of unproved oil and gas property costs , including amortization of capitalized interest , were $ 173 million , $ 211 million and $ 291 million during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . 15 . asset retirement obligations the following table presents the reconciliation of the beginning and ending aggregate carrying amounts of short-term and long-term legal obligations associated with the retirement of property , plant and equipment for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount at beginning of period</td><td>$ 946848</td><td>$ 912926</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liabilities incurred</td><td>79057</td><td>54764</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>liabilities settled ( 1 )</td><td>-70829 ( 70829 )</td><td>-61871 ( 61871 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accretion</td><td>36622</td><td>34708</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>revisions</td><td>-38932 ( 38932 )</td><td>-9818 ( 9818 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>foreign currency translations</td><td>1611</td><td>16139</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>carrying amount at end of period</td><td>$ 954377</td><td>$ 946848</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>current portion</td><td>$ 26214</td><td>$ 19259</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>noncurrent portion</td><td>$ 928163</td><td>$ 927589</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes settlements related to asset sales . the current and noncurrent portions of eog's asset retirement obligations are included in current liabilities - other and other liabilities , respectively , on the consolidated balance sheets. .
Question: how much do the liabilities incurred in 2018 represent in relation to the ones incurred in 2017?
| 1.44359 |
CONVFINQA5184 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
eog utilized average prices per acre from comparable market transactions and estimated discounted cash flows as the basis for determining the fair value of unproved and proved properties , respectively , received in non-cash property exchanges . see note 10 . fair value of debt . at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , eog had outstanding $ 6040 million and $ 6390 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes , which had estimated fair values of approximately $ 6027 million and $ 6602 million , respectively . the estimated fair value of debt was based upon quoted market prices and , where such prices were not available , other observable ( level 2 ) inputs regarding interest rates available to eog at year-end . 14 . accounting for certain long-lived assets eog reviews its proved oil and gas properties for impairment purposes by comparing the expected undiscounted future cash flows at a depreciation , depletion and amortization group level to the unamortized capitalized cost of the asset . the carrying values for assets determined to be impaired were adjusted to estimated fair value using the income approach described in the fair value measurement topic of the asc . in certain instances , eog utilizes accepted offers from third-party purchasers as the basis for determining fair value . during 2018 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 139 million were written down to their fair value of $ 18 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 121 million . during 2017 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 370 million were written down to their fair value of $ 146 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 224 million . impairments in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 included domestic legacy natural gas assets . amortization and impairments of unproved oil and gas property costs , including amortization of capitalized interest , were $ 173 million , $ 211 million and $ 291 million during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . 15 . asset retirement obligations the following table presents the reconciliation of the beginning and ending aggregate carrying amounts of short-term and long-term legal obligations associated with the retirement of property , plant and equipment for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount at beginning of period</td><td>$ 946848</td><td>$ 912926</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liabilities incurred</td><td>79057</td><td>54764</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>liabilities settled ( 1 )</td><td>-70829 ( 70829 )</td><td>-61871 ( 61871 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accretion</td><td>36622</td><td>34708</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>revisions</td><td>-38932 ( 38932 )</td><td>-9818 ( 9818 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>foreign currency translations</td><td>1611</td><td>16139</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>carrying amount at end of period</td><td>$ 954377</td><td>$ 946848</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>current portion</td><td>$ 26214</td><td>$ 19259</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>noncurrent portion</td><td>$ 928163</td><td>$ 927589</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes settlements related to asset sales . the current and noncurrent portions of eog's asset retirement obligations are included in current liabilities - other and other liabilities , respectively , on the consolidated balance sheets. .
Question: how much do the liabilities incurred in 2018 represent in relation to the ones incurred in 2017?
Answer: 1.44359
Question: and what is the difference between this value and the number one?
| 0.44359 |
CONVFINQA5185 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
royal caribbean cruises ltd . 79 notes to the consolidated financial statements in 2012 , we determined the implied fair value of good- will for the pullmantur reporting unit was $ 145.5 mil- lion and recognized an impairment charge of $ 319.2 million based on a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model further discussed below . this impair- ment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impair- ment of pullmantur related assets within our consoli- dated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . during the fourth quarter of 2014 , we performed a qualitative assessment of whether it was more-likely- than-not that our royal caribbean international reporting unit 2019s fair value was less than its carrying amount before applying the two-step goodwill impair- ment test . the qualitative analysis included assessing the impact of certain factors such as general economic conditions , limitations on accessing capital , changes in forecasted operating results , changes in fuel prices and fluctuations in foreign exchange rates . based on our qualitative assessment , we concluded that it was more-likely-than-not that the estimated fair value of the royal caribbean international reporting unit exceeded its carrying value and thus , we did not pro- ceed to the two-step goodwill impairment test . no indicators of impairment exist primarily because the reporting unit 2019s fair value has consistently exceeded its carrying value by a significant margin , its financial performance has been solid in the face of mixed economic environments and forecasts of operating results generated by the reporting unit appear suffi- cient to support its carrying value . we also performed our annual impairment review of goodwill for pullmantur 2019s reporting unit during the fourth quarter of 2014 . we did not perform a quali- tative assessment but instead proceeded directly to the two-step goodwill impairment test . we estimated the fair value of the pullmantur reporting unit using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model . the principal assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model are projected operating results , weighted- average cost of capital , and terminal value . signifi- cantly impacting these assumptions are the transfer of vessels from our other cruise brands to pullmantur . the discounted cash flow model used our 2015 pro- jected operating results as a base . to that base , we added future years 2019 cash flows assuming multiple rev- enue and expense scenarios that reflect the impact of different global economic environments beyond 2015 on pullmantur 2019s reporting unit . we assigned a probability to each revenue and expense scenario . we discounted the projected cash flows using rates specific to pullmantur 2019s reporting unit based on its weighted-average cost of capital . based on the probability-weighted discounted cash flows , we deter- mined the fair value of the pullmantur reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 52% ( 52 % ) resulting in no impairment to pullmantur 2019s goodwill . pullmantur is a brand targeted primarily at the spanish , portuguese and latin american markets , with an increasing focus on latin america . the persistent economic instability in these markets has created sig- nificant uncertainties in forecasting operating results and future cash flows used in our impairment analyses . we continue to monitor economic events in these markets for their potential impact on pullmantur 2019s business and valuation . further , the estimation of fair value utilizing discounted expected future cash flows includes numerous uncertainties which require our significant judgment when making assumptions of expected revenues , operating costs , marketing , sell- ing and administrative expenses , interest rates , ship additions and retirements as well as assumptions regarding the cruise vacation industry 2019s competitive environment and general economic and business conditions , among other factors . if there are changes to the projected future cash flows used in the impairment analyses , especially in net yields or if certain transfers of vessels from our other cruise brands to the pullmantur fleet do not take place , it is possible that an impairment charge of pullmantur 2019s reporting unit 2019s goodwill may be required . of these factors , the planned transfers of vessels to the pullmantur fleet is most significant to the projected future cash flows . if the transfers do not occur , we will likely fail step one of the impairment test . note 4 . intangible assets intangible assets are reported in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and consist of the follow- ing ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indefinite-life intangible asset 2014pullmantur trademarks and trade names</td><td>$ 214112</td><td>$ 204866</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>-26074 ( 26074 )</td><td>9246</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 188038</td><td>$ 214112</td></tr></table> during the fourth quarter of 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we performed the annual impairment review of pullmantur 2019s trademarks and trade names using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method to compare the fair value of these indefinite-lived intan- gible assets to its carrying value . the royalty rate used is based on comparable royalty agreements in the tourism and hospitality industry . we used a dis- count rate comparable to the rate used in valuing the pullmantur reporting unit in our goodwill impairment test . based on the results of our testing , we did not .
Question: what was the mathematical range between the foreign currency translation adjustments in the years of 2013 and 2014?
| 35320.0 |
CONVFINQA5186 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
royal caribbean cruises ltd . 79 notes to the consolidated financial statements in 2012 , we determined the implied fair value of good- will for the pullmantur reporting unit was $ 145.5 mil- lion and recognized an impairment charge of $ 319.2 million based on a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model further discussed below . this impair- ment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impair- ment of pullmantur related assets within our consoli- dated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . during the fourth quarter of 2014 , we performed a qualitative assessment of whether it was more-likely- than-not that our royal caribbean international reporting unit 2019s fair value was less than its carrying amount before applying the two-step goodwill impair- ment test . the qualitative analysis included assessing the impact of certain factors such as general economic conditions , limitations on accessing capital , changes in forecasted operating results , changes in fuel prices and fluctuations in foreign exchange rates . based on our qualitative assessment , we concluded that it was more-likely-than-not that the estimated fair value of the royal caribbean international reporting unit exceeded its carrying value and thus , we did not pro- ceed to the two-step goodwill impairment test . no indicators of impairment exist primarily because the reporting unit 2019s fair value has consistently exceeded its carrying value by a significant margin , its financial performance has been solid in the face of mixed economic environments and forecasts of operating results generated by the reporting unit appear suffi- cient to support its carrying value . we also performed our annual impairment review of goodwill for pullmantur 2019s reporting unit during the fourth quarter of 2014 . we did not perform a quali- tative assessment but instead proceeded directly to the two-step goodwill impairment test . we estimated the fair value of the pullmantur reporting unit using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model . the principal assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model are projected operating results , weighted- average cost of capital , and terminal value . signifi- cantly impacting these assumptions are the transfer of vessels from our other cruise brands to pullmantur . the discounted cash flow model used our 2015 pro- jected operating results as a base . to that base , we added future years 2019 cash flows assuming multiple rev- enue and expense scenarios that reflect the impact of different global economic environments beyond 2015 on pullmantur 2019s reporting unit . we assigned a probability to each revenue and expense scenario . we discounted the projected cash flows using rates specific to pullmantur 2019s reporting unit based on its weighted-average cost of capital . based on the probability-weighted discounted cash flows , we deter- mined the fair value of the pullmantur reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 52% ( 52 % ) resulting in no impairment to pullmantur 2019s goodwill . pullmantur is a brand targeted primarily at the spanish , portuguese and latin american markets , with an increasing focus on latin america . the persistent economic instability in these markets has created sig- nificant uncertainties in forecasting operating results and future cash flows used in our impairment analyses . we continue to monitor economic events in these markets for their potential impact on pullmantur 2019s business and valuation . further , the estimation of fair value utilizing discounted expected future cash flows includes numerous uncertainties which require our significant judgment when making assumptions of expected revenues , operating costs , marketing , sell- ing and administrative expenses , interest rates , ship additions and retirements as well as assumptions regarding the cruise vacation industry 2019s competitive environment and general economic and business conditions , among other factors . if there are changes to the projected future cash flows used in the impairment analyses , especially in net yields or if certain transfers of vessels from our other cruise brands to the pullmantur fleet do not take place , it is possible that an impairment charge of pullmantur 2019s reporting unit 2019s goodwill may be required . of these factors , the planned transfers of vessels to the pullmantur fleet is most significant to the projected future cash flows . if the transfers do not occur , we will likely fail step one of the impairment test . note 4 . intangible assets intangible assets are reported in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and consist of the follow- ing ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indefinite-life intangible asset 2014pullmantur trademarks and trade names</td><td>$ 214112</td><td>$ 204866</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>-26074 ( 26074 )</td><td>9246</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 188038</td><td>$ 214112</td></tr></table> during the fourth quarter of 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we performed the annual impairment review of pullmantur 2019s trademarks and trade names using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method to compare the fair value of these indefinite-lived intan- gible assets to its carrying value . the royalty rate used is based on comparable royalty agreements in the tourism and hospitality industry . we used a dis- count rate comparable to the rate used in valuing the pullmantur reporting unit in our goodwill impairment test . based on the results of our testing , we did not .
Question: what was the mathematical range between the foreign currency translation adjustments in the years of 2013 and 2014?
Answer: 35320.0
Question: in that same period, what was the total of intangible assets?
| 402150.0 |
CONVFINQA5187 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
royal caribbean cruises ltd . 79 notes to the consolidated financial statements in 2012 , we determined the implied fair value of good- will for the pullmantur reporting unit was $ 145.5 mil- lion and recognized an impairment charge of $ 319.2 million based on a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model further discussed below . this impair- ment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impair- ment of pullmantur related assets within our consoli- dated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . during the fourth quarter of 2014 , we performed a qualitative assessment of whether it was more-likely- than-not that our royal caribbean international reporting unit 2019s fair value was less than its carrying amount before applying the two-step goodwill impair- ment test . the qualitative analysis included assessing the impact of certain factors such as general economic conditions , limitations on accessing capital , changes in forecasted operating results , changes in fuel prices and fluctuations in foreign exchange rates . based on our qualitative assessment , we concluded that it was more-likely-than-not that the estimated fair value of the royal caribbean international reporting unit exceeded its carrying value and thus , we did not pro- ceed to the two-step goodwill impairment test . no indicators of impairment exist primarily because the reporting unit 2019s fair value has consistently exceeded its carrying value by a significant margin , its financial performance has been solid in the face of mixed economic environments and forecasts of operating results generated by the reporting unit appear suffi- cient to support its carrying value . we also performed our annual impairment review of goodwill for pullmantur 2019s reporting unit during the fourth quarter of 2014 . we did not perform a quali- tative assessment but instead proceeded directly to the two-step goodwill impairment test . we estimated the fair value of the pullmantur reporting unit using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model . the principal assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model are projected operating results , weighted- average cost of capital , and terminal value . signifi- cantly impacting these assumptions are the transfer of vessels from our other cruise brands to pullmantur . the discounted cash flow model used our 2015 pro- jected operating results as a base . to that base , we added future years 2019 cash flows assuming multiple rev- enue and expense scenarios that reflect the impact of different global economic environments beyond 2015 on pullmantur 2019s reporting unit . we assigned a probability to each revenue and expense scenario . we discounted the projected cash flows using rates specific to pullmantur 2019s reporting unit based on its weighted-average cost of capital . based on the probability-weighted discounted cash flows , we deter- mined the fair value of the pullmantur reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 52% ( 52 % ) resulting in no impairment to pullmantur 2019s goodwill . pullmantur is a brand targeted primarily at the spanish , portuguese and latin american markets , with an increasing focus on latin america . the persistent economic instability in these markets has created sig- nificant uncertainties in forecasting operating results and future cash flows used in our impairment analyses . we continue to monitor economic events in these markets for their potential impact on pullmantur 2019s business and valuation . further , the estimation of fair value utilizing discounted expected future cash flows includes numerous uncertainties which require our significant judgment when making assumptions of expected revenues , operating costs , marketing , sell- ing and administrative expenses , interest rates , ship additions and retirements as well as assumptions regarding the cruise vacation industry 2019s competitive environment and general economic and business conditions , among other factors . if there are changes to the projected future cash flows used in the impairment analyses , especially in net yields or if certain transfers of vessels from our other cruise brands to the pullmantur fleet do not take place , it is possible that an impairment charge of pullmantur 2019s reporting unit 2019s goodwill may be required . of these factors , the planned transfers of vessels to the pullmantur fleet is most significant to the projected future cash flows . if the transfers do not occur , we will likely fail step one of the impairment test . note 4 . intangible assets intangible assets are reported in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and consist of the follow- ing ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indefinite-life intangible asset 2014pullmantur trademarks and trade names</td><td>$ 214112</td><td>$ 204866</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>-26074 ( 26074 )</td><td>9246</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 188038</td><td>$ 214112</td></tr></table> during the fourth quarter of 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we performed the annual impairment review of pullmantur 2019s trademarks and trade names using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method to compare the fair value of these indefinite-lived intan- gible assets to its carrying value . the royalty rate used is based on comparable royalty agreements in the tourism and hospitality industry . we used a dis- count rate comparable to the rate used in valuing the pullmantur reporting unit in our goodwill impairment test . based on the results of our testing , we did not .
Question: what was the mathematical range between the foreign currency translation adjustments in the years of 2013 and 2014?
Answer: 35320.0
Question: in that same period, what was the total of intangible assets?
Answer: 402150.0
Question: and what amount from this total is from assets recorded in 2014?
| 188038.0 |
CONVFINQA5188 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
royal caribbean cruises ltd . 79 notes to the consolidated financial statements in 2012 , we determined the implied fair value of good- will for the pullmantur reporting unit was $ 145.5 mil- lion and recognized an impairment charge of $ 319.2 million based on a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model further discussed below . this impair- ment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impair- ment of pullmantur related assets within our consoli- dated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . during the fourth quarter of 2014 , we performed a qualitative assessment of whether it was more-likely- than-not that our royal caribbean international reporting unit 2019s fair value was less than its carrying amount before applying the two-step goodwill impair- ment test . the qualitative analysis included assessing the impact of certain factors such as general economic conditions , limitations on accessing capital , changes in forecasted operating results , changes in fuel prices and fluctuations in foreign exchange rates . based on our qualitative assessment , we concluded that it was more-likely-than-not that the estimated fair value of the royal caribbean international reporting unit exceeded its carrying value and thus , we did not pro- ceed to the two-step goodwill impairment test . no indicators of impairment exist primarily because the reporting unit 2019s fair value has consistently exceeded its carrying value by a significant margin , its financial performance has been solid in the face of mixed economic environments and forecasts of operating results generated by the reporting unit appear suffi- cient to support its carrying value . we also performed our annual impairment review of goodwill for pullmantur 2019s reporting unit during the fourth quarter of 2014 . we did not perform a quali- tative assessment but instead proceeded directly to the two-step goodwill impairment test . we estimated the fair value of the pullmantur reporting unit using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model . the principal assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model are projected operating results , weighted- average cost of capital , and terminal value . signifi- cantly impacting these assumptions are the transfer of vessels from our other cruise brands to pullmantur . the discounted cash flow model used our 2015 pro- jected operating results as a base . to that base , we added future years 2019 cash flows assuming multiple rev- enue and expense scenarios that reflect the impact of different global economic environments beyond 2015 on pullmantur 2019s reporting unit . we assigned a probability to each revenue and expense scenario . we discounted the projected cash flows using rates specific to pullmantur 2019s reporting unit based on its weighted-average cost of capital . based on the probability-weighted discounted cash flows , we deter- mined the fair value of the pullmantur reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 52% ( 52 % ) resulting in no impairment to pullmantur 2019s goodwill . pullmantur is a brand targeted primarily at the spanish , portuguese and latin american markets , with an increasing focus on latin america . the persistent economic instability in these markets has created sig- nificant uncertainties in forecasting operating results and future cash flows used in our impairment analyses . we continue to monitor economic events in these markets for their potential impact on pullmantur 2019s business and valuation . further , the estimation of fair value utilizing discounted expected future cash flows includes numerous uncertainties which require our significant judgment when making assumptions of expected revenues , operating costs , marketing , sell- ing and administrative expenses , interest rates , ship additions and retirements as well as assumptions regarding the cruise vacation industry 2019s competitive environment and general economic and business conditions , among other factors . if there are changes to the projected future cash flows used in the impairment analyses , especially in net yields or if certain transfers of vessels from our other cruise brands to the pullmantur fleet do not take place , it is possible that an impairment charge of pullmantur 2019s reporting unit 2019s goodwill may be required . of these factors , the planned transfers of vessels to the pullmantur fleet is most significant to the projected future cash flows . if the transfers do not occur , we will likely fail step one of the impairment test . note 4 . intangible assets intangible assets are reported in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and consist of the follow- ing ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indefinite-life intangible asset 2014pullmantur trademarks and trade names</td><td>$ 214112</td><td>$ 204866</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>-26074 ( 26074 )</td><td>9246</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 188038</td><td>$ 214112</td></tr></table> during the fourth quarter of 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we performed the annual impairment review of pullmantur 2019s trademarks and trade names using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method to compare the fair value of these indefinite-lived intan- gible assets to its carrying value . the royalty rate used is based on comparable royalty agreements in the tourism and hospitality industry . we used a dis- count rate comparable to the rate used in valuing the pullmantur reporting unit in our goodwill impairment test . based on the results of our testing , we did not .
Question: what was the mathematical range between the foreign currency translation adjustments in the years of 2013 and 2014?
Answer: 35320.0
Question: in that same period, what was the total of intangible assets?
Answer: 402150.0
Question: and what amount from this total is from assets recorded in 2014?
Answer: 188038.0
Question: what portion, then, of that total does this amount represent?
| 0.46758 |
CONVFINQA5189 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
royal caribbean cruises ltd . 79 notes to the consolidated financial statements in 2012 , we determined the implied fair value of good- will for the pullmantur reporting unit was $ 145.5 mil- lion and recognized an impairment charge of $ 319.2 million based on a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model further discussed below . this impair- ment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impair- ment of pullmantur related assets within our consoli- dated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . during the fourth quarter of 2014 , we performed a qualitative assessment of whether it was more-likely- than-not that our royal caribbean international reporting unit 2019s fair value was less than its carrying amount before applying the two-step goodwill impair- ment test . the qualitative analysis included assessing the impact of certain factors such as general economic conditions , limitations on accessing capital , changes in forecasted operating results , changes in fuel prices and fluctuations in foreign exchange rates . based on our qualitative assessment , we concluded that it was more-likely-than-not that the estimated fair value of the royal caribbean international reporting unit exceeded its carrying value and thus , we did not pro- ceed to the two-step goodwill impairment test . no indicators of impairment exist primarily because the reporting unit 2019s fair value has consistently exceeded its carrying value by a significant margin , its financial performance has been solid in the face of mixed economic environments and forecasts of operating results generated by the reporting unit appear suffi- cient to support its carrying value . we also performed our annual impairment review of goodwill for pullmantur 2019s reporting unit during the fourth quarter of 2014 . we did not perform a quali- tative assessment but instead proceeded directly to the two-step goodwill impairment test . we estimated the fair value of the pullmantur reporting unit using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model . the principal assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model are projected operating results , weighted- average cost of capital , and terminal value . signifi- cantly impacting these assumptions are the transfer of vessels from our other cruise brands to pullmantur . the discounted cash flow model used our 2015 pro- jected operating results as a base . to that base , we added future years 2019 cash flows assuming multiple rev- enue and expense scenarios that reflect the impact of different global economic environments beyond 2015 on pullmantur 2019s reporting unit . we assigned a probability to each revenue and expense scenario . we discounted the projected cash flows using rates specific to pullmantur 2019s reporting unit based on its weighted-average cost of capital . based on the probability-weighted discounted cash flows , we deter- mined the fair value of the pullmantur reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 52% ( 52 % ) resulting in no impairment to pullmantur 2019s goodwill . pullmantur is a brand targeted primarily at the spanish , portuguese and latin american markets , with an increasing focus on latin america . the persistent economic instability in these markets has created sig- nificant uncertainties in forecasting operating results and future cash flows used in our impairment analyses . we continue to monitor economic events in these markets for their potential impact on pullmantur 2019s business and valuation . further , the estimation of fair value utilizing discounted expected future cash flows includes numerous uncertainties which require our significant judgment when making assumptions of expected revenues , operating costs , marketing , sell- ing and administrative expenses , interest rates , ship additions and retirements as well as assumptions regarding the cruise vacation industry 2019s competitive environment and general economic and business conditions , among other factors . if there are changes to the projected future cash flows used in the impairment analyses , especially in net yields or if certain transfers of vessels from our other cruise brands to the pullmantur fleet do not take place , it is possible that an impairment charge of pullmantur 2019s reporting unit 2019s goodwill may be required . of these factors , the planned transfers of vessels to the pullmantur fleet is most significant to the projected future cash flows . if the transfers do not occur , we will likely fail step one of the impairment test . note 4 . intangible assets intangible assets are reported in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and consist of the follow- ing ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indefinite-life intangible asset 2014pullmantur trademarks and trade names</td><td>$ 214112</td><td>$ 204866</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>-26074 ( 26074 )</td><td>9246</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 188038</td><td>$ 214112</td></tr></table> during the fourth quarter of 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we performed the annual impairment review of pullmantur 2019s trademarks and trade names using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method to compare the fair value of these indefinite-lived intan- gible assets to its carrying value . the royalty rate used is based on comparable royalty agreements in the tourism and hospitality industry . we used a dis- count rate comparable to the rate used in valuing the pullmantur reporting unit in our goodwill impairment test . based on the results of our testing , we did not .
Question: what was the mathematical range between the foreign currency translation adjustments in the years of 2013 and 2014?
Answer: 35320.0
Question: in that same period, what was the total of intangible assets?
Answer: 402150.0
Question: and what amount from this total is from assets recorded in 2014?
Answer: 188038.0
Question: what portion, then, of that total does this amount represent?
Answer: 0.46758
Question: and how much is that in percentage?
| 46.75817 |
CONVFINQA5190 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
long-term liabilities . the value of the company 2019s deferred compensation obligations is based on the market value of the participants 2019 notional investment accounts . the notional investments are comprised primarily of mutual funds , which are based on observable market prices . mark-to-market derivative asset and liability 2014the company utilizes fixed-to-floating interest-rate swaps , typically designated as fair-value hedges , to achieve a targeted level of variable-rate debt as a percentage of total debt . the company also employs derivative financial instruments in the form of variable-to-fixed interest rate swaps , classified as economic hedges , in order to fix the interest cost on some of its variable-rate debt . the company uses a calculation of future cash inflows and estimated future outflows , which are discounted , to determine the current fair value . additional inputs to the present value calculation include the contract terms , counterparty credit risk , interest rates and market volatility . other investments 2014other investments primarily represent money market funds used for active employee benefits . the company includes other investments in other current assets . note 18 : leases the company has entered into operating leases involving certain facilities and equipment . rental expenses under operating leases were $ 21 for 2015 , $ 22 for 2014 and $ 23 for 2013 . the operating leases for facilities will expire over the next 25 years and the operating leases for equipment will expire over the next five years . certain operating leases have renewal options ranging from one to five years . the minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non- cancelable lease terms over the next five years and thereafter are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 13</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2017</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2018</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2019</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2020</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>74</td></tr></table> the company has a series of agreements with various public entities ( the 201cpartners 201d ) to establish certain joint ventures , commonly referred to as 201cpublic-private partnerships . 201d under the public-private partnerships , the company constructed utility plant , financed by the company and the partners constructed utility plant ( connected to the company 2019s property ) , financed by the partners . the company agreed to transfer and convey some of its real and personal property to the partners in exchange for an equal principal amount of industrial development bonds ( 201cidbs 201d ) , issued by the partners under a state industrial development bond and commercial development act . the company leased back the total facilities , including portions funded by both the company and the partners , under leases for a period of 40 years . the leases related to the portion of the facilities funded by the company have required payments from the company to the partners that approximate the payments required by the terms of the idbs from the partners to the company ( as the holder of the idbs ) . as the ownership of the portion of the facilities constructed by the company will revert back to the company at the end of the lease , the company has recorded these as capital leases . the lease obligation and the receivable for the principal amount of the idbs are presented by the company on a net basis . the gross cost of the facilities funded by the company recognized as a capital lease asset was $ 156 and $ 157 as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , which is presented in property , plant and equipment in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the future payments under the lease obligations are equal to and offset by the payments receivable under the idbs. .
Question: from 2014 to 2015, what was the decline in the amortization expense for the operating leases for facility and equipment?
| 1.0 |
CONVFINQA5191 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
long-term liabilities . the value of the company 2019s deferred compensation obligations is based on the market value of the participants 2019 notional investment accounts . the notional investments are comprised primarily of mutual funds , which are based on observable market prices . mark-to-market derivative asset and liability 2014the company utilizes fixed-to-floating interest-rate swaps , typically designated as fair-value hedges , to achieve a targeted level of variable-rate debt as a percentage of total debt . the company also employs derivative financial instruments in the form of variable-to-fixed interest rate swaps , classified as economic hedges , in order to fix the interest cost on some of its variable-rate debt . the company uses a calculation of future cash inflows and estimated future outflows , which are discounted , to determine the current fair value . additional inputs to the present value calculation include the contract terms , counterparty credit risk , interest rates and market volatility . other investments 2014other investments primarily represent money market funds used for active employee benefits . the company includes other investments in other current assets . note 18 : leases the company has entered into operating leases involving certain facilities and equipment . rental expenses under operating leases were $ 21 for 2015 , $ 22 for 2014 and $ 23 for 2013 . the operating leases for facilities will expire over the next 25 years and the operating leases for equipment will expire over the next five years . certain operating leases have renewal options ranging from one to five years . the minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non- cancelable lease terms over the next five years and thereafter are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 13</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2017</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2018</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2019</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2020</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>74</td></tr></table> the company has a series of agreements with various public entities ( the 201cpartners 201d ) to establish certain joint ventures , commonly referred to as 201cpublic-private partnerships . 201d under the public-private partnerships , the company constructed utility plant , financed by the company and the partners constructed utility plant ( connected to the company 2019s property ) , financed by the partners . the company agreed to transfer and convey some of its real and personal property to the partners in exchange for an equal principal amount of industrial development bonds ( 201cidbs 201d ) , issued by the partners under a state industrial development bond and commercial development act . the company leased back the total facilities , including portions funded by both the company and the partners , under leases for a period of 40 years . the leases related to the portion of the facilities funded by the company have required payments from the company to the partners that approximate the payments required by the terms of the idbs from the partners to the company ( as the holder of the idbs ) . as the ownership of the portion of the facilities constructed by the company will revert back to the company at the end of the lease , the company has recorded these as capital leases . the lease obligation and the receivable for the principal amount of the idbs are presented by the company on a net basis . the gross cost of the facilities funded by the company recognized as a capital lease asset was $ 156 and $ 157 as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , which is presented in property , plant and equipment in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the future payments under the lease obligations are equal to and offset by the payments receivable under the idbs. .
Question: from 2014 to 2015, what was the decline in the amortization expense for the operating leases for facility and equipment?
Answer: 1.0
Question: and from 2015 to 2016, what was that decline?
| 8.0 |
CONVFINQA5192 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
long-term product offerings include alpha-seeking active and index strategies . our alpha-seeking active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile , and leverage fundamental research and quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . although many clients use both alpha-seeking active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class , or may use a combination of index strategies to target active returns . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . net flows in institutional index products generally have a small impact on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2017 equity aum totaled $ 3.372 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 130.1 billion . net inflows included $ 174.4 billion into ishares etfs , driven by net inflows into core funds and broad developed and emerging market equities , partially offset by non-etf index and active net outflows of $ 25.7 billion and $ 18.5 billion , respectively . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aum mix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which may not consistently move in tandem with u.s . markets , have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s equity revenues and effective fee rate . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2017 at $ 1.855 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 178.8 billion . in 2017 , active net inflows of $ 21.5 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , and included strong inflows into municipal , unconstrained and total return bond funds . ishares etfs net inflows of $ 67.5 billion were led by flows into core , corporate and treasury bond funds . non-etf index net inflows of $ 89.8 billion were driven by demand for liability-driven investment solutions . multi-asset blackrock 2019s multi-asset team manages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset aum for 2017 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , net inflows ( outflows ) market change impact december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 312016</td><td>net inflows ( outflows )</td><td>marketchange</td><td>fximpact</td><td>december 312017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>asset allocation and balanced</td><td>$ 176675</td><td>$ -2502 ( 2502 )</td><td>$ 17387</td><td>$ 4985</td><td>$ 196545</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>target date/risk</td><td>149432</td><td>23925</td><td>24532</td><td>1577</td><td>199466</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fiduciary</td><td>68395</td><td>-1047 ( 1047 )</td><td>7522</td><td>8819</td><td>83689</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>futureadvisor ( 1 )</td><td>505</td><td>-46 ( 46 )</td><td>119</td><td>2014</td><td>578</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 395007</td><td>$ 20330</td><td>$ 49560</td><td>$ 15381</td><td>$ 480278</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) futureadvisor amounts do not include aum held in ishares etfs . multi-asset net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 18.9 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 20.8 billion to institutional multi-asset net inflows in 2017 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net inflows of $ 1.1 billion reflected demand for our multi-asset income fund family , which raised $ 5.8 billion in 2017 . the company 2019s multi-asset strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 41% ( 41 % ) of multi-asset aum at year-end . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation and multi-asset income fund families . 2022 target date and target risk products grew 16% ( 16 % ) organically in 2017 , with net inflows of $ 23.9 billion . institutional investors represented 93% ( 93 % ) of target date and target risk aum , with defined contribution plans accounting for 87% ( 87 % ) of aum . flows were driven by defined contribution investments in our lifepath offerings . lifepath products utilize a proprietary active asset allocation overlay model that seeks to balance risk and return over an investment horizon based on the investor 2019s expected retirement timing . underlying investments are primarily index products . 2022 fiduciary management services are complex mandates in which pension plan sponsors or endowments and foundations retain blackrock to assume responsibility for some or all aspects of investment management . these customized services require strong partnership with the clients 2019 investment staff and trustees in order to tailor investment strategies to meet client-specific risk budgets and return objectives. .
Question: what is the balance of total multi-asset aum in 2017?
| 480278.0 |
CONVFINQA5193 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
long-term product offerings include alpha-seeking active and index strategies . our alpha-seeking active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile , and leverage fundamental research and quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . although many clients use both alpha-seeking active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class , or may use a combination of index strategies to target active returns . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . net flows in institutional index products generally have a small impact on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2017 equity aum totaled $ 3.372 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 130.1 billion . net inflows included $ 174.4 billion into ishares etfs , driven by net inflows into core funds and broad developed and emerging market equities , partially offset by non-etf index and active net outflows of $ 25.7 billion and $ 18.5 billion , respectively . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aum mix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which may not consistently move in tandem with u.s . markets , have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s equity revenues and effective fee rate . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2017 at $ 1.855 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 178.8 billion . in 2017 , active net inflows of $ 21.5 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , and included strong inflows into municipal , unconstrained and total return bond funds . ishares etfs net inflows of $ 67.5 billion were led by flows into core , corporate and treasury bond funds . non-etf index net inflows of $ 89.8 billion were driven by demand for liability-driven investment solutions . multi-asset blackrock 2019s multi-asset team manages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset aum for 2017 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , net inflows ( outflows ) market change impact december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 312016</td><td>net inflows ( outflows )</td><td>marketchange</td><td>fximpact</td><td>december 312017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>asset allocation and balanced</td><td>$ 176675</td><td>$ -2502 ( 2502 )</td><td>$ 17387</td><td>$ 4985</td><td>$ 196545</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>target date/risk</td><td>149432</td><td>23925</td><td>24532</td><td>1577</td><td>199466</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fiduciary</td><td>68395</td><td>-1047 ( 1047 )</td><td>7522</td><td>8819</td><td>83689</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>futureadvisor ( 1 )</td><td>505</td><td>-46 ( 46 )</td><td>119</td><td>2014</td><td>578</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 395007</td><td>$ 20330</td><td>$ 49560</td><td>$ 15381</td><td>$ 480278</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) futureadvisor amounts do not include aum held in ishares etfs . multi-asset net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 18.9 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 20.8 billion to institutional multi-asset net inflows in 2017 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net inflows of $ 1.1 billion reflected demand for our multi-asset income fund family , which raised $ 5.8 billion in 2017 . the company 2019s multi-asset strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 41% ( 41 % ) of multi-asset aum at year-end . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation and multi-asset income fund families . 2022 target date and target risk products grew 16% ( 16 % ) organically in 2017 , with net inflows of $ 23.9 billion . institutional investors represented 93% ( 93 % ) of target date and target risk aum , with defined contribution plans accounting for 87% ( 87 % ) of aum . flows were driven by defined contribution investments in our lifepath offerings . lifepath products utilize a proprietary active asset allocation overlay model that seeks to balance risk and return over an investment horizon based on the investor 2019s expected retirement timing . underlying investments are primarily index products . 2022 fiduciary management services are complex mandates in which pension plan sponsors or endowments and foundations retain blackrock to assume responsibility for some or all aspects of investment management . these customized services require strong partnership with the clients 2019 investment staff and trustees in order to tailor investment strategies to meet client-specific risk budgets and return objectives. .
Question: what is the balance of total multi-asset aum in 2017?
Answer: 480278.0
Question: what about in 2016?
| 395007.0 |
CONVFINQA5194 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
long-term product offerings include alpha-seeking active and index strategies . our alpha-seeking active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile , and leverage fundamental research and quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . although many clients use both alpha-seeking active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class , or may use a combination of index strategies to target active returns . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . net flows in institutional index products generally have a small impact on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2017 equity aum totaled $ 3.372 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 130.1 billion . net inflows included $ 174.4 billion into ishares etfs , driven by net inflows into core funds and broad developed and emerging market equities , partially offset by non-etf index and active net outflows of $ 25.7 billion and $ 18.5 billion , respectively . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aum mix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which may not consistently move in tandem with u.s . markets , have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s equity revenues and effective fee rate . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2017 at $ 1.855 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 178.8 billion . in 2017 , active net inflows of $ 21.5 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , and included strong inflows into municipal , unconstrained and total return bond funds . ishares etfs net inflows of $ 67.5 billion were led by flows into core , corporate and treasury bond funds . non-etf index net inflows of $ 89.8 billion were driven by demand for liability-driven investment solutions . multi-asset blackrock 2019s multi-asset team manages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset aum for 2017 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , net inflows ( outflows ) market change impact december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 312016</td><td>net inflows ( outflows )</td><td>marketchange</td><td>fximpact</td><td>december 312017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>asset allocation and balanced</td><td>$ 176675</td><td>$ -2502 ( 2502 )</td><td>$ 17387</td><td>$ 4985</td><td>$ 196545</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>target date/risk</td><td>149432</td><td>23925</td><td>24532</td><td>1577</td><td>199466</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fiduciary</td><td>68395</td><td>-1047 ( 1047 )</td><td>7522</td><td>8819</td><td>83689</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>futureadvisor ( 1 )</td><td>505</td><td>-46 ( 46 )</td><td>119</td><td>2014</td><td>578</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 395007</td><td>$ 20330</td><td>$ 49560</td><td>$ 15381</td><td>$ 480278</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) futureadvisor amounts do not include aum held in ishares etfs . multi-asset net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 18.9 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 20.8 billion to institutional multi-asset net inflows in 2017 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net inflows of $ 1.1 billion reflected demand for our multi-asset income fund family , which raised $ 5.8 billion in 2017 . the company 2019s multi-asset strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 41% ( 41 % ) of multi-asset aum at year-end . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation and multi-asset income fund families . 2022 target date and target risk products grew 16% ( 16 % ) organically in 2017 , with net inflows of $ 23.9 billion . institutional investors represented 93% ( 93 % ) of target date and target risk aum , with defined contribution plans accounting for 87% ( 87 % ) of aum . flows were driven by defined contribution investments in our lifepath offerings . lifepath products utilize a proprietary active asset allocation overlay model that seeks to balance risk and return over an investment horizon based on the investor 2019s expected retirement timing . underlying investments are primarily index products . 2022 fiduciary management services are complex mandates in which pension plan sponsors or endowments and foundations retain blackrock to assume responsibility for some or all aspects of investment management . these customized services require strong partnership with the clients 2019 investment staff and trustees in order to tailor investment strategies to meet client-specific risk budgets and return objectives. .
Question: what is the balance of total multi-asset aum in 2017?
Answer: 480278.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Answer: 395007.0
Question: what is the fraction of 2017 balance to 2016 balance?
| 1.21587 |
CONVFINQA5195 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
long-term product offerings include alpha-seeking active and index strategies . our alpha-seeking active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile , and leverage fundamental research and quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . although many clients use both alpha-seeking active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class , or may use a combination of index strategies to target active returns . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . net flows in institutional index products generally have a small impact on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2017 equity aum totaled $ 3.372 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 130.1 billion . net inflows included $ 174.4 billion into ishares etfs , driven by net inflows into core funds and broad developed and emerging market equities , partially offset by non-etf index and active net outflows of $ 25.7 billion and $ 18.5 billion , respectively . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aum mix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which may not consistently move in tandem with u.s . markets , have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s equity revenues and effective fee rate . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2017 at $ 1.855 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 178.8 billion . in 2017 , active net inflows of $ 21.5 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , and included strong inflows into municipal , unconstrained and total return bond funds . ishares etfs net inflows of $ 67.5 billion were led by flows into core , corporate and treasury bond funds . non-etf index net inflows of $ 89.8 billion were driven by demand for liability-driven investment solutions . multi-asset blackrock 2019s multi-asset team manages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset aum for 2017 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , net inflows ( outflows ) market change impact december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 312016</td><td>net inflows ( outflows )</td><td>marketchange</td><td>fximpact</td><td>december 312017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>asset allocation and balanced</td><td>$ 176675</td><td>$ -2502 ( 2502 )</td><td>$ 17387</td><td>$ 4985</td><td>$ 196545</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>target date/risk</td><td>149432</td><td>23925</td><td>24532</td><td>1577</td><td>199466</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fiduciary</td><td>68395</td><td>-1047 ( 1047 )</td><td>7522</td><td>8819</td><td>83689</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>futureadvisor ( 1 )</td><td>505</td><td>-46 ( 46 )</td><td>119</td><td>2014</td><td>578</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 395007</td><td>$ 20330</td><td>$ 49560</td><td>$ 15381</td><td>$ 480278</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) futureadvisor amounts do not include aum held in ishares etfs . multi-asset net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 18.9 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 20.8 billion to institutional multi-asset net inflows in 2017 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net inflows of $ 1.1 billion reflected demand for our multi-asset income fund family , which raised $ 5.8 billion in 2017 . the company 2019s multi-asset strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 41% ( 41 % ) of multi-asset aum at year-end . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation and multi-asset income fund families . 2022 target date and target risk products grew 16% ( 16 % ) organically in 2017 , with net inflows of $ 23.9 billion . institutional investors represented 93% ( 93 % ) of target date and target risk aum , with defined contribution plans accounting for 87% ( 87 % ) of aum . flows were driven by defined contribution investments in our lifepath offerings . lifepath products utilize a proprietary active asset allocation overlay model that seeks to balance risk and return over an investment horizon based on the investor 2019s expected retirement timing . underlying investments are primarily index products . 2022 fiduciary management services are complex mandates in which pension plan sponsors or endowments and foundations retain blackrock to assume responsibility for some or all aspects of investment management . these customized services require strong partnership with the clients 2019 investment staff and trustees in order to tailor investment strategies to meet client-specific risk budgets and return objectives. .
Question: what is the balance of total multi-asset aum in 2017?
Answer: 480278.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Answer: 395007.0
Question: what is the fraction of 2017 balance to 2016 balance?
Answer: 1.21587
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.21587 |
CONVFINQA5196 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
long-term product offerings include alpha-seeking active and index strategies . our alpha-seeking active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile , and leverage fundamental research and quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . although many clients use both alpha-seeking active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class , or may use a combination of index strategies to target active returns . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . net flows in institutional index products generally have a small impact on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2017 equity aum totaled $ 3.372 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 130.1 billion . net inflows included $ 174.4 billion into ishares etfs , driven by net inflows into core funds and broad developed and emerging market equities , partially offset by non-etf index and active net outflows of $ 25.7 billion and $ 18.5 billion , respectively . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aum mix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which may not consistently move in tandem with u.s . markets , have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s equity revenues and effective fee rate . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2017 at $ 1.855 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 178.8 billion . in 2017 , active net inflows of $ 21.5 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , and included strong inflows into municipal , unconstrained and total return bond funds . ishares etfs net inflows of $ 67.5 billion were led by flows into core , corporate and treasury bond funds . non-etf index net inflows of $ 89.8 billion were driven by demand for liability-driven investment solutions . multi-asset blackrock 2019s multi-asset team manages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset aum for 2017 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , net inflows ( outflows ) market change impact december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 312016</td><td>net inflows ( outflows )</td><td>marketchange</td><td>fximpact</td><td>december 312017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>asset allocation and balanced</td><td>$ 176675</td><td>$ -2502 ( 2502 )</td><td>$ 17387</td><td>$ 4985</td><td>$ 196545</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>target date/risk</td><td>149432</td><td>23925</td><td>24532</td><td>1577</td><td>199466</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fiduciary</td><td>68395</td><td>-1047 ( 1047 )</td><td>7522</td><td>8819</td><td>83689</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>futureadvisor ( 1 )</td><td>505</td><td>-46 ( 46 )</td><td>119</td><td>2014</td><td>578</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 395007</td><td>$ 20330</td><td>$ 49560</td><td>$ 15381</td><td>$ 480278</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) futureadvisor amounts do not include aum held in ishares etfs . multi-asset net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 18.9 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 20.8 billion to institutional multi-asset net inflows in 2017 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net inflows of $ 1.1 billion reflected demand for our multi-asset income fund family , which raised $ 5.8 billion in 2017 . the company 2019s multi-asset strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 41% ( 41 % ) of multi-asset aum at year-end . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation and multi-asset income fund families . 2022 target date and target risk products grew 16% ( 16 % ) organically in 2017 , with net inflows of $ 23.9 billion . institutional investors represented 93% ( 93 % ) of target date and target risk aum , with defined contribution plans accounting for 87% ( 87 % ) of aum . flows were driven by defined contribution investments in our lifepath offerings . lifepath products utilize a proprietary active asset allocation overlay model that seeks to balance risk and return over an investment horizon based on the investor 2019s expected retirement timing . underlying investments are primarily index products . 2022 fiduciary management services are complex mandates in which pension plan sponsors or endowments and foundations retain blackrock to assume responsibility for some or all aspects of investment management . these customized services require strong partnership with the clients 2019 investment staff and trustees in order to tailor investment strategies to meet client-specific risk budgets and return objectives. .
Question: what is the balance of total multi-asset aum in 2017?
Answer: 480278.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Answer: 395007.0
Question: what is the fraction of 2017 balance to 2016 balance?
Answer: 1.21587
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.21587
Question: what is the net effect of the total market change and fximpact in the balance of total multi-asset aum in 2017?
| 64941.0 |
CONVFINQA5197 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
52 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k repatriation of undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 would have resulted in a u.s . tax cost of approximately $ 250 million and $ 110 million , respectively . the company files federal , state and local income tax returns in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions . in most tax jurisdictions , returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities for a number of years after the returns have been filed . the company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities in any major tax jurisdiction for years before 2006 . additionally , the internal revenue service has completed its examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax returns filed for years through 2010 . the examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax return for 2011 is currently underway and is expected to be finalized during 2014 . a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) as of december 31 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 111</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>2014</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td></tr></table> the company expects that any reasonably possible change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months would not be significant . the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate was $ 81 million as of december 31 , 2013 . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had liabilities for estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the company recognized $ 2 million and $ 5 million of income in 2013 and 2012 , respectively , related to the reduction of estimated interest and penalties . the company recognized no income or expense for estimated interest and penalties during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . 13 . pensions and other postretirement benefits defined benefit plans ppg has defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees worldwide . the principal defined benefit pension plans are those in the u.s. , canada , the netherlands and the u.k . which , in the aggregate represent approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of the projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2013 , of which the u.s . defined benefit pension plans represent the majority . ppg also sponsors welfare benefit plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for certain u.s . and canadian employees and their dependents . these programs require retiree contributions based on retiree-selected coverage levels for certain retirees and their dependents and provide for sharing of future benefit cost increases between ppg and participants based on management discretion . the company has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefit plans in the future . salaried and certain hourly employees in the u.s . hired on or after october 1 , 2004 , or rehired on or after october 1 , 2012 are not eligible for postretirement medical benefits . salaried employees in the u.s . hired , rehired or transferred to salaried status on or after january 1 , 2006 , and certain u.s . hourly employees hired in 2006 or thereafter are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan . these employees are not eligible for defined benefit pension plan benefits . plan design changes in january 2011 , the company approved an amendment to one of its u.s . defined benefit pension plans that represented about 77% ( 77 % ) of the total u.s . projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2011 . depending upon the affected employee's combined age and years of service to ppg , this change resulted in certain employees no longer accruing benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2011 , while the remaining employees will no longer accrue benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2020 . the affected employees will participate in the company 2019s defined contribution retirement plan from the date their benefit under the defined benefit plan is frozen . the company remeasured the projected benefit obligation of this amended plan , which lowered 2011 pension expense by approximately $ 12 million . the company made similar changes to certain other u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 . the company recognized a curtailment loss and special termination benefits associated with these plan amendments of $ 5 million in 2011 . the company plans to continue reviewing and potentially changing other ppg defined benefit plans in the future . separation and merger of commodity chemicals business on january 28 , 2013 , ppg completed the separation of its commodity chemicals business and the merger of the subsidiary holding the ppg commodity chemicals business with a subsidiary of georgia gulf , as discussed in note 22 , 201cseparation and merger transaction . 201d ppg transferred the defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefit liabilities for the affected employees in the u.s. , canada , and taiwan in the separation resulting in a net partial settlement loss of $ 33 million notes to the consolidated financial statements .
Question: what was the increase in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits from 2012 to 2013?
| 0.76636 |
CONVFINQA5198 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
52 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k repatriation of undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 would have resulted in a u.s . tax cost of approximately $ 250 million and $ 110 million , respectively . the company files federal , state and local income tax returns in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions . in most tax jurisdictions , returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities for a number of years after the returns have been filed . the company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities in any major tax jurisdiction for years before 2006 . additionally , the internal revenue service has completed its examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax returns filed for years through 2010 . the examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax return for 2011 is currently underway and is expected to be finalized during 2014 . a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) as of december 31 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 111</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>2014</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td></tr></table> the company expects that any reasonably possible change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months would not be significant . the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate was $ 81 million as of december 31 , 2013 . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had liabilities for estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the company recognized $ 2 million and $ 5 million of income in 2013 and 2012 , respectively , related to the reduction of estimated interest and penalties . the company recognized no income or expense for estimated interest and penalties during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . 13 . pensions and other postretirement benefits defined benefit plans ppg has defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees worldwide . the principal defined benefit pension plans are those in the u.s. , canada , the netherlands and the u.k . which , in the aggregate represent approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of the projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2013 , of which the u.s . defined benefit pension plans represent the majority . ppg also sponsors welfare benefit plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for certain u.s . and canadian employees and their dependents . these programs require retiree contributions based on retiree-selected coverage levels for certain retirees and their dependents and provide for sharing of future benefit cost increases between ppg and participants based on management discretion . the company has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefit plans in the future . salaried and certain hourly employees in the u.s . hired on or after october 1 , 2004 , or rehired on or after october 1 , 2012 are not eligible for postretirement medical benefits . salaried employees in the u.s . hired , rehired or transferred to salaried status on or after january 1 , 2006 , and certain u.s . hourly employees hired in 2006 or thereafter are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan . these employees are not eligible for defined benefit pension plan benefits . plan design changes in january 2011 , the company approved an amendment to one of its u.s . defined benefit pension plans that represented about 77% ( 77 % ) of the total u.s . projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2011 . depending upon the affected employee's combined age and years of service to ppg , this change resulted in certain employees no longer accruing benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2011 , while the remaining employees will no longer accrue benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2020 . the affected employees will participate in the company 2019s defined contribution retirement plan from the date their benefit under the defined benefit plan is frozen . the company remeasured the projected benefit obligation of this amended plan , which lowered 2011 pension expense by approximately $ 12 million . the company made similar changes to certain other u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 . the company recognized a curtailment loss and special termination benefits associated with these plan amendments of $ 5 million in 2011 . the company plans to continue reviewing and potentially changing other ppg defined benefit plans in the future . separation and merger of commodity chemicals business on january 28 , 2013 , ppg completed the separation of its commodity chemicals business and the merger of the subsidiary holding the ppg commodity chemicals business with a subsidiary of georgia gulf , as discussed in note 22 , 201cseparation and merger transaction . 201d ppg transferred the defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefit liabilities for the affected employees in the u.s. , canada , and taiwan in the separation resulting in a net partial settlement loss of $ 33 million notes to the consolidated financial statements .
Question: what was the increase in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 0.76636
Question: and what was that increase from 2011 to 2012?
| 1.03659 |
CONVFINQA5199 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
52 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k repatriation of undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 would have resulted in a u.s . tax cost of approximately $ 250 million and $ 110 million , respectively . the company files federal , state and local income tax returns in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions . in most tax jurisdictions , returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities for a number of years after the returns have been filed . the company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities in any major tax jurisdiction for years before 2006 . additionally , the internal revenue service has completed its examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax returns filed for years through 2010 . the examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax return for 2011 is currently underway and is expected to be finalized during 2014 . a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) as of december 31 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 111</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>2014</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td></tr></table> the company expects that any reasonably possible change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months would not be significant . the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate was $ 81 million as of december 31 , 2013 . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had liabilities for estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the company recognized $ 2 million and $ 5 million of income in 2013 and 2012 , respectively , related to the reduction of estimated interest and penalties . the company recognized no income or expense for estimated interest and penalties during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . 13 . pensions and other postretirement benefits defined benefit plans ppg has defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees worldwide . the principal defined benefit pension plans are those in the u.s. , canada , the netherlands and the u.k . which , in the aggregate represent approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of the projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2013 , of which the u.s . defined benefit pension plans represent the majority . ppg also sponsors welfare benefit plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for certain u.s . and canadian employees and their dependents . these programs require retiree contributions based on retiree-selected coverage levels for certain retirees and their dependents and provide for sharing of future benefit cost increases between ppg and participants based on management discretion . the company has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefit plans in the future . salaried and certain hourly employees in the u.s . hired on or after october 1 , 2004 , or rehired on or after october 1 , 2012 are not eligible for postretirement medical benefits . salaried employees in the u.s . hired , rehired or transferred to salaried status on or after january 1 , 2006 , and certain u.s . hourly employees hired in 2006 or thereafter are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan . these employees are not eligible for defined benefit pension plan benefits . plan design changes in january 2011 , the company approved an amendment to one of its u.s . defined benefit pension plans that represented about 77% ( 77 % ) of the total u.s . projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2011 . depending upon the affected employee's combined age and years of service to ppg , this change resulted in certain employees no longer accruing benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2011 , while the remaining employees will no longer accrue benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2020 . the affected employees will participate in the company 2019s defined contribution retirement plan from the date their benefit under the defined benefit plan is frozen . the company remeasured the projected benefit obligation of this amended plan , which lowered 2011 pension expense by approximately $ 12 million . the company made similar changes to certain other u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 . the company recognized a curtailment loss and special termination benefits associated with these plan amendments of $ 5 million in 2011 . the company plans to continue reviewing and potentially changing other ppg defined benefit plans in the future . separation and merger of commodity chemicals business on january 28 , 2013 , ppg completed the separation of its commodity chemicals business and the merger of the subsidiary holding the ppg commodity chemicals business with a subsidiary of georgia gulf , as discussed in note 22 , 201cseparation and merger transaction . 201d ppg transferred the defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefit liabilities for the affected employees in the u.s. , canada , and taiwan in the separation resulting in a net partial settlement loss of $ 33 million notes to the consolidated financial statements .
Question: what was the increase in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 0.76636
Question: and what was that increase from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 1.03659
Question: what is, then, the sum of these increases?
| 1.80294 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.