id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA5200 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
52 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k repatriation of undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 would have resulted in a u.s . tax cost of approximately $ 250 million and $ 110 million , respectively . the company files federal , state and local income tax returns in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions . in most tax jurisdictions , returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities for a number of years after the returns have been filed . the company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities in any major tax jurisdiction for years before 2006 . additionally , the internal revenue service has completed its examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax returns filed for years through 2010 . the examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax return for 2011 is currently underway and is expected to be finalized during 2014 . a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) as of december 31 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 111</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>2014</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td></tr></table> the company expects that any reasonably possible change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months would not be significant . the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate was $ 81 million as of december 31 , 2013 . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had liabilities for estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the company recognized $ 2 million and $ 5 million of income in 2013 and 2012 , respectively , related to the reduction of estimated interest and penalties . the company recognized no income or expense for estimated interest and penalties during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . 13 . pensions and other postretirement benefits defined benefit plans ppg has defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees worldwide . the principal defined benefit pension plans are those in the u.s. , canada , the netherlands and the u.k . which , in the aggregate represent approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of the projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2013 , of which the u.s . defined benefit pension plans represent the majority . ppg also sponsors welfare benefit plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for certain u.s . and canadian employees and their dependents . these programs require retiree contributions based on retiree-selected coverage levels for certain retirees and their dependents and provide for sharing of future benefit cost increases between ppg and participants based on management discretion . the company has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefit plans in the future . salaried and certain hourly employees in the u.s . hired on or after october 1 , 2004 , or rehired on or after october 1 , 2012 are not eligible for postretirement medical benefits . salaried employees in the u.s . hired , rehired or transferred to salaried status on or after january 1 , 2006 , and certain u.s . hourly employees hired in 2006 or thereafter are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan . these employees are not eligible for defined benefit pension plan benefits . plan design changes in january 2011 , the company approved an amendment to one of its u.s . defined benefit pension plans that represented about 77% ( 77 % ) of the total u.s . projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2011 . depending upon the affected employee's combined age and years of service to ppg , this change resulted in certain employees no longer accruing benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2011 , while the remaining employees will no longer accrue benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2020 . the affected employees will participate in the company 2019s defined contribution retirement plan from the date their benefit under the defined benefit plan is frozen . the company remeasured the projected benefit obligation of this amended plan , which lowered 2011 pension expense by approximately $ 12 million . the company made similar changes to certain other u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 . the company recognized a curtailment loss and special termination benefits associated with these plan amendments of $ 5 million in 2011 . the company plans to continue reviewing and potentially changing other ppg defined benefit plans in the future . separation and merger of commodity chemicals business on january 28 , 2013 , ppg completed the separation of its commodity chemicals business and the merger of the subsidiary holding the ppg commodity chemicals business with a subsidiary of georgia gulf , as discussed in note 22 , 201cseparation and merger transaction . 201d ppg transferred the defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefit liabilities for the affected employees in the u.s. , canada , and taiwan in the separation resulting in a net partial settlement loss of $ 33 million notes to the consolidated financial statements .
Question: what was the increase in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 0.76636
Question: and what was that increase from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 1.03659
Question: what is, then, the sum of these increases?
Answer: 1.80294
Question: and what is the average between them?
| 0.90147 |
CONVFINQA5201 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
52 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k repatriation of undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 would have resulted in a u.s . tax cost of approximately $ 250 million and $ 110 million , respectively . the company files federal , state and local income tax returns in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions . in most tax jurisdictions , returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities for a number of years after the returns have been filed . the company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities in any major tax jurisdiction for years before 2006 . additionally , the internal revenue service has completed its examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax returns filed for years through 2010 . the examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax return for 2011 is currently underway and is expected to be finalized during 2014 . a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) as of december 31 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 111</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>2014</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td></tr></table> the company expects that any reasonably possible change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months would not be significant . the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate was $ 81 million as of december 31 , 2013 . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had liabilities for estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the company recognized $ 2 million and $ 5 million of income in 2013 and 2012 , respectively , related to the reduction of estimated interest and penalties . the company recognized no income or expense for estimated interest and penalties during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . 13 . pensions and other postretirement benefits defined benefit plans ppg has defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees worldwide . the principal defined benefit pension plans are those in the u.s. , canada , the netherlands and the u.k . which , in the aggregate represent approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of the projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2013 , of which the u.s . defined benefit pension plans represent the majority . ppg also sponsors welfare benefit plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for certain u.s . and canadian employees and their dependents . these programs require retiree contributions based on retiree-selected coverage levels for certain retirees and their dependents and provide for sharing of future benefit cost increases between ppg and participants based on management discretion . the company has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefit plans in the future . salaried and certain hourly employees in the u.s . hired on or after october 1 , 2004 , or rehired on or after october 1 , 2012 are not eligible for postretirement medical benefits . salaried employees in the u.s . hired , rehired or transferred to salaried status on or after january 1 , 2006 , and certain u.s . hourly employees hired in 2006 or thereafter are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan . these employees are not eligible for defined benefit pension plan benefits . plan design changes in january 2011 , the company approved an amendment to one of its u.s . defined benefit pension plans that represented about 77% ( 77 % ) of the total u.s . projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2011 . depending upon the affected employee's combined age and years of service to ppg , this change resulted in certain employees no longer accruing benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2011 , while the remaining employees will no longer accrue benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2020 . the affected employees will participate in the company 2019s defined contribution retirement plan from the date their benefit under the defined benefit plan is frozen . the company remeasured the projected benefit obligation of this amended plan , which lowered 2011 pension expense by approximately $ 12 million . the company made similar changes to certain other u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 . the company recognized a curtailment loss and special termination benefits associated with these plan amendments of $ 5 million in 2011 . the company plans to continue reviewing and potentially changing other ppg defined benefit plans in the future . separation and merger of commodity chemicals business on january 28 , 2013 , ppg completed the separation of its commodity chemicals business and the merger of the subsidiary holding the ppg commodity chemicals business with a subsidiary of georgia gulf , as discussed in note 22 , 201cseparation and merger transaction . 201d ppg transferred the defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefit liabilities for the affected employees in the u.s. , canada , and taiwan in the separation resulting in a net partial settlement loss of $ 33 million notes to the consolidated financial statements .
Question: what was the increase in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 0.76636
Question: and what was that increase from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 1.03659
Question: what is, then, the sum of these increases?
Answer: 1.80294
Question: and what is the average between them?
Answer: 0.90147
Question: in that same period of 2011 to 2012, what was the total of unrecognized tax benefits, in millions?
| 19.0 |
CONVFINQA5202 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
52 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k repatriation of undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 would have resulted in a u.s . tax cost of approximately $ 250 million and $ 110 million , respectively . the company files federal , state and local income tax returns in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions . in most tax jurisdictions , returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities for a number of years after the returns have been filed . the company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities in any major tax jurisdiction for years before 2006 . additionally , the internal revenue service has completed its examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax returns filed for years through 2010 . the examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax return for 2011 is currently underway and is expected to be finalized during 2014 . a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) as of december 31 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 111</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>2014</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td></tr></table> the company expects that any reasonably possible change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months would not be significant . the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate was $ 81 million as of december 31 , 2013 . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had liabilities for estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the company recognized $ 2 million and $ 5 million of income in 2013 and 2012 , respectively , related to the reduction of estimated interest and penalties . the company recognized no income or expense for estimated interest and penalties during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . 13 . pensions and other postretirement benefits defined benefit plans ppg has defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees worldwide . the principal defined benefit pension plans are those in the u.s. , canada , the netherlands and the u.k . which , in the aggregate represent approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of the projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2013 , of which the u.s . defined benefit pension plans represent the majority . ppg also sponsors welfare benefit plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for certain u.s . and canadian employees and their dependents . these programs require retiree contributions based on retiree-selected coverage levels for certain retirees and their dependents and provide for sharing of future benefit cost increases between ppg and participants based on management discretion . the company has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefit plans in the future . salaried and certain hourly employees in the u.s . hired on or after october 1 , 2004 , or rehired on or after october 1 , 2012 are not eligible for postretirement medical benefits . salaried employees in the u.s . hired , rehired or transferred to salaried status on or after january 1 , 2006 , and certain u.s . hourly employees hired in 2006 or thereafter are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan . these employees are not eligible for defined benefit pension plan benefits . plan design changes in january 2011 , the company approved an amendment to one of its u.s . defined benefit pension plans that represented about 77% ( 77 % ) of the total u.s . projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2011 . depending upon the affected employee's combined age and years of service to ppg , this change resulted in certain employees no longer accruing benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2011 , while the remaining employees will no longer accrue benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2020 . the affected employees will participate in the company 2019s defined contribution retirement plan from the date their benefit under the defined benefit plan is frozen . the company remeasured the projected benefit obligation of this amended plan , which lowered 2011 pension expense by approximately $ 12 million . the company made similar changes to certain other u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 . the company recognized a curtailment loss and special termination benefits associated with these plan amendments of $ 5 million in 2011 . the company plans to continue reviewing and potentially changing other ppg defined benefit plans in the future . separation and merger of commodity chemicals business on january 28 , 2013 , ppg completed the separation of its commodity chemicals business and the merger of the subsidiary holding the ppg commodity chemicals business with a subsidiary of georgia gulf , as discussed in note 22 , 201cseparation and merger transaction . 201d ppg transferred the defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefit liabilities for the affected employees in the u.s. , canada , and taiwan in the separation resulting in a net partial settlement loss of $ 33 million notes to the consolidated financial statements .
Question: what was the increase in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 0.76636
Question: and what was that increase from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 1.03659
Question: what is, then, the sum of these increases?
Answer: 1.80294
Question: and what is the average between them?
Answer: 0.90147
Question: in that same period of 2011 to 2012, what was the total of unrecognized tax benefits, in millions?
Answer: 19.0
Question: including 2013, what then becomes this total?
| 34.0 |
CONVFINQA5203 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
52 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k repatriation of undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 would have resulted in a u.s . tax cost of approximately $ 250 million and $ 110 million , respectively . the company files federal , state and local income tax returns in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions . in most tax jurisdictions , returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities for a number of years after the returns have been filed . the company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities in any major tax jurisdiction for years before 2006 . additionally , the internal revenue service has completed its examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax returns filed for years through 2010 . the examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax return for 2011 is currently underway and is expected to be finalized during 2014 . a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) as of december 31 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 111</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>2014</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td></tr></table> the company expects that any reasonably possible change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months would not be significant . the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate was $ 81 million as of december 31 , 2013 . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had liabilities for estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the company recognized $ 2 million and $ 5 million of income in 2013 and 2012 , respectively , related to the reduction of estimated interest and penalties . the company recognized no income or expense for estimated interest and penalties during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . 13 . pensions and other postretirement benefits defined benefit plans ppg has defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees worldwide . the principal defined benefit pension plans are those in the u.s. , canada , the netherlands and the u.k . which , in the aggregate represent approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of the projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2013 , of which the u.s . defined benefit pension plans represent the majority . ppg also sponsors welfare benefit plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for certain u.s . and canadian employees and their dependents . these programs require retiree contributions based on retiree-selected coverage levels for certain retirees and their dependents and provide for sharing of future benefit cost increases between ppg and participants based on management discretion . the company has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefit plans in the future . salaried and certain hourly employees in the u.s . hired on or after october 1 , 2004 , or rehired on or after october 1 , 2012 are not eligible for postretirement medical benefits . salaried employees in the u.s . hired , rehired or transferred to salaried status on or after january 1 , 2006 , and certain u.s . hourly employees hired in 2006 or thereafter are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan . these employees are not eligible for defined benefit pension plan benefits . plan design changes in january 2011 , the company approved an amendment to one of its u.s . defined benefit pension plans that represented about 77% ( 77 % ) of the total u.s . projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2011 . depending upon the affected employee's combined age and years of service to ppg , this change resulted in certain employees no longer accruing benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2011 , while the remaining employees will no longer accrue benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2020 . the affected employees will participate in the company 2019s defined contribution retirement plan from the date their benefit under the defined benefit plan is frozen . the company remeasured the projected benefit obligation of this amended plan , which lowered 2011 pension expense by approximately $ 12 million . the company made similar changes to certain other u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 . the company recognized a curtailment loss and special termination benefits associated with these plan amendments of $ 5 million in 2011 . the company plans to continue reviewing and potentially changing other ppg defined benefit plans in the future . separation and merger of commodity chemicals business on january 28 , 2013 , ppg completed the separation of its commodity chemicals business and the merger of the subsidiary holding the ppg commodity chemicals business with a subsidiary of georgia gulf , as discussed in note 22 , 201cseparation and merger transaction . 201d ppg transferred the defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefit liabilities for the affected employees in the u.s. , canada , and taiwan in the separation resulting in a net partial settlement loss of $ 33 million notes to the consolidated financial statements .
Question: what was the increase in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 0.76636
Question: and what was that increase from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 1.03659
Question: what is, then, the sum of these increases?
Answer: 1.80294
Question: and what is the average between them?
Answer: 0.90147
Question: in that same period of 2011 to 2012, what was the total of unrecognized tax benefits, in millions?
Answer: 19.0
Question: including 2013, what then becomes this total?
Answer: 34.0
Question: and what were the average unrecognized tax benefits between the three years, in millions?
| 11.33333 |
CONVFINQA5204 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 89% ( 89 % ) and 93% ( 93 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>$ -26.9 ( 26.9 )</td><td>$ 27.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>-27.5 ( 27.5 )</td><td>28.4</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 . we had $ 1642.1 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2013 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2013 and 2012 , we had interest income of $ 24.7 and $ 29.5 , respectively . based on our 2013 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.4 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2013 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2013 were the australian dollar , brazilian real , euro , japanese yen and the south african rand . based on 2013 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase between 3% ( 3 % ) and 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2013 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. .
Question: what was the net amount received from increasing and decreasing interest rates?
| 1.0 |
CONVFINQA5205 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 89% ( 89 % ) and 93% ( 93 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>$ -26.9 ( 26.9 )</td><td>$ 27.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>-27.5 ( 27.5 )</td><td>28.4</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 . we had $ 1642.1 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2013 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2013 and 2012 , we had interest income of $ 24.7 and $ 29.5 , respectively . based on our 2013 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.4 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2013 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2013 were the australian dollar , brazilian real , euro , japanese yen and the south african rand . based on 2013 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase between 3% ( 3 % ) and 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2013 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. .
Question: what was the net amount received from increasing and decreasing interest rates?
Answer: 1.0
Question: and including interest income?
| 25.7 |
CONVFINQA5206 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 89% ( 89 % ) and 93% ( 93 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>$ -26.9 ( 26.9 )</td><td>$ 27.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>-27.5 ( 27.5 )</td><td>28.4</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 . we had $ 1642.1 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2013 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2013 and 2012 , we had interest income of $ 24.7 and $ 29.5 , respectively . based on our 2013 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.4 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2013 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2013 were the australian dollar , brazilian real , euro , japanese yen and the south african rand . based on 2013 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase between 3% ( 3 % ) and 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2013 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. .
Question: what was the net amount received from increasing and decreasing interest rates?
Answer: 1.0
Question: and including interest income?
Answer: 25.7
Question: how much would the interest income increase with a 100bp increase in interest rates?
| 41.1 |
CONVFINQA5207 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 89% ( 89 % ) and 93% ( 93 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>$ -26.9 ( 26.9 )</td><td>$ 27.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>-27.5 ( 27.5 )</td><td>28.4</td></tr></table> we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 . we had $ 1642.1 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2013 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2013 and 2012 , we had interest income of $ 24.7 and $ 29.5 , respectively . based on our 2013 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.4 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2013 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2013 were the australian dollar , brazilian real , euro , japanese yen and the south african rand . based on 2013 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase between 3% ( 3 % ) and 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2013 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. .
Question: what was the net amount received from increasing and decreasing interest rates?
Answer: 1.0
Question: and including interest income?
Answer: 25.7
Question: how much would the interest income increase with a 100bp increase in interest rates?
Answer: 41.1
Question: and with a 100bp decrease?
| 8.3 |
CONVFINQA5208 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
hologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) its supply chain and improve manufacturing margins . the combination of the companies should also facilitate further manufacturing efficiencies and accelerate research and development of new detector products . aeg was a privately held group of companies headquartered in warstein , germany , with manufacturing operations in germany , china and the united states . the aggregate purchase price for aeg was approximately $ 31300 ( subject to adjustment ) consisting of eur $ 24100 in cash and 110 shares of hologic common stock valued at $ 5300 , and approximately $ 1900 for acquisition related fees and expenses . the company determined the fair value of the shares issued in connection with the acquisition in accordance with eitf issue no . 99-12 , determination of the measurement date for the market price of acquirer securities issued in a purchase business combination . these 110 shares were subject to contingent put options pursuant to which the holders had the option to resell the shares to the company during a period of one year following the completion of the acquisition if the closing price of the company 2019s stock falls and remains below a threshold price . the put options were never exercised and expired on may 2 , 2007 . the acquisition also provided for a one-year earn out of eur 1700 ( approximately $ 2000 usd ) which was payable in cash if aeg calendar year 2006 earnings , as defined , exceeded a pre-determined amount . aeg 2019s 2006 earnings did not exceed such pre-determined amounts and no payment was made . the components and allocation of the purchase price , consists of the following approximate amounts: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>net tangible assets acquired as of may 2 2006</td><td>$ 24800</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>in-process research and development</td><td>600</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>developed technology and know how</td><td>1900</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>customer relationship</td><td>800</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>trade name</td><td>400</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-3000 ( 3000 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>goodwill</td><td>5800</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>estimated purchase price</td><td>$ 31300</td></tr></table> the company implemented a plan to restructure certain of aeg 2019s historical activities . the company originally recorded a liability of approximately $ 2100 in accordance with eitf issue no . 95-3 , recognition of liabilities in connection with a purchase business combination , related to the termination of certain employees under this plan . upon completion of the plan in fiscal 2007 the company reduced this liability by approximately $ 241 with a corresponding reduction in goodwill . all amounts have been paid as of september 29 , 2007 . as part of the aeg acquisition the company acquired a minority interest in the equity securities of a private german company . the company estimated the fair value of these securities to be approximately $ 1400 in its original purchase price allocation . during the year ended september 29 , 2007 , the company sold these securities for proceeds of approximately $ 2150 . the difference of approximately $ 750 between the preliminary fair value estimate and proceeds upon sale has been recorded as a reduction of goodwill . the final purchase price allocations were completed within one year of the acquisition and the adjustments did not have a material impact on the company 2019s financial position or results of operations . there have been no other material changes to the purchase price allocation as disclosed in the company 2019s form 10-k for the year ended september 30 , 2006 . as part of the purchase price allocation , all intangible assets that were a part of the acquisition were identified and valued . it was determined that only customer relationship , trade name , developed technology and know how and in-process research and development had separately identifiable values . the fair value of these intangible assets was determined through the application of the income approach . customer relationship represents aeg 2019s high dependency on a small number of large accounts . aeg markets its products through distributors as well as directly to its own customers . trade name represents aeg 2019s product names that the company intends to continue to use . developed technology and know how represents currently marketable .
Question: what portion of the estimated purchase price is for goodwill?
| 0.1853 |
CONVFINQA5209 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
hologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) its supply chain and improve manufacturing margins . the combination of the companies should also facilitate further manufacturing efficiencies and accelerate research and development of new detector products . aeg was a privately held group of companies headquartered in warstein , germany , with manufacturing operations in germany , china and the united states . the aggregate purchase price for aeg was approximately $ 31300 ( subject to adjustment ) consisting of eur $ 24100 in cash and 110 shares of hologic common stock valued at $ 5300 , and approximately $ 1900 for acquisition related fees and expenses . the company determined the fair value of the shares issued in connection with the acquisition in accordance with eitf issue no . 99-12 , determination of the measurement date for the market price of acquirer securities issued in a purchase business combination . these 110 shares were subject to contingent put options pursuant to which the holders had the option to resell the shares to the company during a period of one year following the completion of the acquisition if the closing price of the company 2019s stock falls and remains below a threshold price . the put options were never exercised and expired on may 2 , 2007 . the acquisition also provided for a one-year earn out of eur 1700 ( approximately $ 2000 usd ) which was payable in cash if aeg calendar year 2006 earnings , as defined , exceeded a pre-determined amount . aeg 2019s 2006 earnings did not exceed such pre-determined amounts and no payment was made . the components and allocation of the purchase price , consists of the following approximate amounts: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>net tangible assets acquired as of may 2 2006</td><td>$ 24800</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>in-process research and development</td><td>600</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>developed technology and know how</td><td>1900</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>customer relationship</td><td>800</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>trade name</td><td>400</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-3000 ( 3000 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>goodwill</td><td>5800</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>estimated purchase price</td><td>$ 31300</td></tr></table> the company implemented a plan to restructure certain of aeg 2019s historical activities . the company originally recorded a liability of approximately $ 2100 in accordance with eitf issue no . 95-3 , recognition of liabilities in connection with a purchase business combination , related to the termination of certain employees under this plan . upon completion of the plan in fiscal 2007 the company reduced this liability by approximately $ 241 with a corresponding reduction in goodwill . all amounts have been paid as of september 29 , 2007 . as part of the aeg acquisition the company acquired a minority interest in the equity securities of a private german company . the company estimated the fair value of these securities to be approximately $ 1400 in its original purchase price allocation . during the year ended september 29 , 2007 , the company sold these securities for proceeds of approximately $ 2150 . the difference of approximately $ 750 between the preliminary fair value estimate and proceeds upon sale has been recorded as a reduction of goodwill . the final purchase price allocations were completed within one year of the acquisition and the adjustments did not have a material impact on the company 2019s financial position or results of operations . there have been no other material changes to the purchase price allocation as disclosed in the company 2019s form 10-k for the year ended september 30 , 2006 . as part of the purchase price allocation , all intangible assets that were a part of the acquisition were identified and valued . it was determined that only customer relationship , trade name , developed technology and know how and in-process research and development had separately identifiable values . the fair value of these intangible assets was determined through the application of the income approach . customer relationship represents aeg 2019s high dependency on a small number of large accounts . aeg markets its products through distributors as well as directly to its own customers . trade name represents aeg 2019s product names that the company intends to continue to use . developed technology and know how represents currently marketable .
Question: what portion of the estimated purchase price is for goodwill?
Answer: 0.1853
Question: what is the fair value of hologic common stock?
| 48.18182 |
CONVFINQA5210 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements the table below presents information regarding group inc . 2019s regulatory capital ratios and tier 1 leverage ratio under basel i , as implemented by the federal reserve board . the information as of december 2013 reflects the revised market risk regulatory capital requirements . these changes resulted in increased regulatory capital requirements for market risk . the information as of december 2012 is prior to the implementation of these revised market risk regulatory capital requirements. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2013</td><td>as of december 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>tier 1 capital</td><td>$ 72471</td><td>$ 66977</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>tier 2 capital</td><td>$ 13632</td><td>$ 13429</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total capital</td><td>$ 86103</td><td>$ 80406</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>risk-weighted assets</td><td>$ 433226</td><td>$ 399928</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>tier 1 capital ratio</td><td>16.7% ( 16.7 % )</td><td>16.7% ( 16.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total capital ratio</td><td>19.9% ( 19.9 % )</td><td>20.1% ( 20.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>tier 1 leverage ratio</td><td>8.1% ( 8.1 % )</td><td>7.3% ( 7.3 % )</td></tr></table> revised capital framework the u.s . federal bank regulatory agencies ( agencies ) have approved revised risk-based capital and leverage ratio regulations establishing a new comprehensive capital framework for u.s . banking organizations ( revised capital framework ) . these regulations are largely based on the basel committee 2019s december 2010 final capital framework for strengthening international capital standards ( basel iii ) and also implement certain provisions of the dodd-frank act . under the revised capital framework , group inc . is an 201cadvanced approach 201d banking organization . below are the aspects of the rules that are most relevant to the firm , as an advanced approach banking organization . definition of capital and capital ratios . the revised capital framework introduced changes to the definition of regulatory capital , which , subject to transitional provisions , became effective across the firm 2019s regulatory capital and leverage ratios on january 1 , 2014 . these changes include the introduction of a new capital measure called common equity tier 1 ( cet1 ) , and the related regulatory capital ratio of cet1 to rwas ( cet1 ratio ) . in addition , the definition of tier 1 capital has been narrowed to include only cet1 and instruments such as perpetual non- cumulative preferred stock , which meet certain criteria . certain aspects of the revised requirements phase in over time . these include increases in the minimum capital ratio requirements and the introduction of new capital buffers and certain deductions from regulatory capital ( such as investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions ) . in addition , junior subordinated debt issued to trusts is being phased out of regulatory capital . the minimum cet1 ratio is 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) as of january 1 , 2014 and will increase to 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) on january 1 , 2015 . the minimum tier 1 capital ratio increased from 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) to 5.5% ( 5.5 % ) on january 1 , 2014 and will increase to 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) beginning january 1 , 2015 . the minimum total capital ratio remains unchanged at 8.0% ( 8.0 % ) . these minimum ratios will be supplemented by a new capital conservation buffer that phases in , beginning january 1 , 2016 , in increments of 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per year until it reaches 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) on january 1 , 2019 . the revised capital framework also introduces a new counter-cyclical capital buffer , to be imposed in the event that national supervisors deem it necessary in order to counteract excessive credit growth . risk-weighted assets . in february 2014 , the federal reserve board informed us that we have completed a satisfactory 201cparallel run , 201d as required of advanced approach banking organizations under the revised capital framework , and therefore changes to rwas will take effect beginning with the second quarter of 2014 . accordingly , the calculation of rwas in future quarters will be based on the following methodologies : 2030 during the first quarter of 2014 2014 the basel i risk-based capital framework adjusted for certain items related to existing capital deductions and the phase-in of new capital deductions ( basel i adjusted ) ; 2030 during the remaining quarters of 2014 2014 the higher of rwas computed under the basel iii advanced approach or the basel i adjusted calculation ; and 2030 beginning in the first quarter of 2015 2014 the higher of rwas computed under the basel iii advanced or standardized approach . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 191 .
Question: what is the difference between the tier 2 capital of december 2013 and that of december 2012?
| 203.0 |
CONVFINQA5211 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements the table below presents information regarding group inc . 2019s regulatory capital ratios and tier 1 leverage ratio under basel i , as implemented by the federal reserve board . the information as of december 2013 reflects the revised market risk regulatory capital requirements . these changes resulted in increased regulatory capital requirements for market risk . the information as of december 2012 is prior to the implementation of these revised market risk regulatory capital requirements. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2013</td><td>as of december 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>tier 1 capital</td><td>$ 72471</td><td>$ 66977</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>tier 2 capital</td><td>$ 13632</td><td>$ 13429</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total capital</td><td>$ 86103</td><td>$ 80406</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>risk-weighted assets</td><td>$ 433226</td><td>$ 399928</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>tier 1 capital ratio</td><td>16.7% ( 16.7 % )</td><td>16.7% ( 16.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total capital ratio</td><td>19.9% ( 19.9 % )</td><td>20.1% ( 20.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>tier 1 leverage ratio</td><td>8.1% ( 8.1 % )</td><td>7.3% ( 7.3 % )</td></tr></table> revised capital framework the u.s . federal bank regulatory agencies ( agencies ) have approved revised risk-based capital and leverage ratio regulations establishing a new comprehensive capital framework for u.s . banking organizations ( revised capital framework ) . these regulations are largely based on the basel committee 2019s december 2010 final capital framework for strengthening international capital standards ( basel iii ) and also implement certain provisions of the dodd-frank act . under the revised capital framework , group inc . is an 201cadvanced approach 201d banking organization . below are the aspects of the rules that are most relevant to the firm , as an advanced approach banking organization . definition of capital and capital ratios . the revised capital framework introduced changes to the definition of regulatory capital , which , subject to transitional provisions , became effective across the firm 2019s regulatory capital and leverage ratios on january 1 , 2014 . these changes include the introduction of a new capital measure called common equity tier 1 ( cet1 ) , and the related regulatory capital ratio of cet1 to rwas ( cet1 ratio ) . in addition , the definition of tier 1 capital has been narrowed to include only cet1 and instruments such as perpetual non- cumulative preferred stock , which meet certain criteria . certain aspects of the revised requirements phase in over time . these include increases in the minimum capital ratio requirements and the introduction of new capital buffers and certain deductions from regulatory capital ( such as investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions ) . in addition , junior subordinated debt issued to trusts is being phased out of regulatory capital . the minimum cet1 ratio is 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) as of january 1 , 2014 and will increase to 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) on january 1 , 2015 . the minimum tier 1 capital ratio increased from 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) to 5.5% ( 5.5 % ) on january 1 , 2014 and will increase to 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) beginning january 1 , 2015 . the minimum total capital ratio remains unchanged at 8.0% ( 8.0 % ) . these minimum ratios will be supplemented by a new capital conservation buffer that phases in , beginning january 1 , 2016 , in increments of 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per year until it reaches 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) on january 1 , 2019 . the revised capital framework also introduces a new counter-cyclical capital buffer , to be imposed in the event that national supervisors deem it necessary in order to counteract excessive credit growth . risk-weighted assets . in february 2014 , the federal reserve board informed us that we have completed a satisfactory 201cparallel run , 201d as required of advanced approach banking organizations under the revised capital framework , and therefore changes to rwas will take effect beginning with the second quarter of 2014 . accordingly , the calculation of rwas in future quarters will be based on the following methodologies : 2030 during the first quarter of 2014 2014 the basel i risk-based capital framework adjusted for certain items related to existing capital deductions and the phase-in of new capital deductions ( basel i adjusted ) ; 2030 during the remaining quarters of 2014 2014 the higher of rwas computed under the basel iii advanced approach or the basel i adjusted calculation ; and 2030 beginning in the first quarter of 2015 2014 the higher of rwas computed under the basel iii advanced or standardized approach . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 191 .
Question: what is the difference between the tier 2 capital of december 2013 and that of december 2012?
Answer: 203.0
Question: what is the tier 2 capital of december 2012?
| 13429.0 |
CONVFINQA5212 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements the table below presents information regarding group inc . 2019s regulatory capital ratios and tier 1 leverage ratio under basel i , as implemented by the federal reserve board . the information as of december 2013 reflects the revised market risk regulatory capital requirements . these changes resulted in increased regulatory capital requirements for market risk . the information as of december 2012 is prior to the implementation of these revised market risk regulatory capital requirements. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2013</td><td>as of december 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>tier 1 capital</td><td>$ 72471</td><td>$ 66977</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>tier 2 capital</td><td>$ 13632</td><td>$ 13429</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total capital</td><td>$ 86103</td><td>$ 80406</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>risk-weighted assets</td><td>$ 433226</td><td>$ 399928</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>tier 1 capital ratio</td><td>16.7% ( 16.7 % )</td><td>16.7% ( 16.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total capital ratio</td><td>19.9% ( 19.9 % )</td><td>20.1% ( 20.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>tier 1 leverage ratio</td><td>8.1% ( 8.1 % )</td><td>7.3% ( 7.3 % )</td></tr></table> revised capital framework the u.s . federal bank regulatory agencies ( agencies ) have approved revised risk-based capital and leverage ratio regulations establishing a new comprehensive capital framework for u.s . banking organizations ( revised capital framework ) . these regulations are largely based on the basel committee 2019s december 2010 final capital framework for strengthening international capital standards ( basel iii ) and also implement certain provisions of the dodd-frank act . under the revised capital framework , group inc . is an 201cadvanced approach 201d banking organization . below are the aspects of the rules that are most relevant to the firm , as an advanced approach banking organization . definition of capital and capital ratios . the revised capital framework introduced changes to the definition of regulatory capital , which , subject to transitional provisions , became effective across the firm 2019s regulatory capital and leverage ratios on january 1 , 2014 . these changes include the introduction of a new capital measure called common equity tier 1 ( cet1 ) , and the related regulatory capital ratio of cet1 to rwas ( cet1 ratio ) . in addition , the definition of tier 1 capital has been narrowed to include only cet1 and instruments such as perpetual non- cumulative preferred stock , which meet certain criteria . certain aspects of the revised requirements phase in over time . these include increases in the minimum capital ratio requirements and the introduction of new capital buffers and certain deductions from regulatory capital ( such as investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions ) . in addition , junior subordinated debt issued to trusts is being phased out of regulatory capital . the minimum cet1 ratio is 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) as of january 1 , 2014 and will increase to 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) on january 1 , 2015 . the minimum tier 1 capital ratio increased from 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) to 5.5% ( 5.5 % ) on january 1 , 2014 and will increase to 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) beginning january 1 , 2015 . the minimum total capital ratio remains unchanged at 8.0% ( 8.0 % ) . these minimum ratios will be supplemented by a new capital conservation buffer that phases in , beginning january 1 , 2016 , in increments of 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per year until it reaches 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) on january 1 , 2019 . the revised capital framework also introduces a new counter-cyclical capital buffer , to be imposed in the event that national supervisors deem it necessary in order to counteract excessive credit growth . risk-weighted assets . in february 2014 , the federal reserve board informed us that we have completed a satisfactory 201cparallel run , 201d as required of advanced approach banking organizations under the revised capital framework , and therefore changes to rwas will take effect beginning with the second quarter of 2014 . accordingly , the calculation of rwas in future quarters will be based on the following methodologies : 2030 during the first quarter of 2014 2014 the basel i risk-based capital framework adjusted for certain items related to existing capital deductions and the phase-in of new capital deductions ( basel i adjusted ) ; 2030 during the remaining quarters of 2014 2014 the higher of rwas computed under the basel iii advanced approach or the basel i adjusted calculation ; and 2030 beginning in the first quarter of 2015 2014 the higher of rwas computed under the basel iii advanced or standardized approach . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 191 .
Question: what is the difference between the tier 2 capital of december 2013 and that of december 2012?
Answer: 203.0
Question: what is the tier 2 capital of december 2012?
Answer: 13429.0
Question: how much does that difference represents in relation to the tier 2 capital of december 2012?
| 0.01512 |
CONVFINQA5213 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
on the underlying exposure . for derivative contracts that are designated and qualify as cash fl ow hedges , the effective portion of gains and losses on these contracts is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassifi ed into earnings in the same period the hedged transaction affects earnings . hedge ineffectiveness is immediately recognized in earnings . derivative contracts that are not designated as hedging instruments are recorded at fair value with the gain or loss recognized in current earnings during the period of change . we may enter into foreign currency forward and option contracts to reduce the effect of fl uctuating currency exchange rates ( principally the euro , the british pound , and the japanese yen ) . foreign currency derivatives used for hedging are put in place using the same or like currencies and duration as the underlying exposures . forward contracts are principally used to manage exposures arising from subsidiary trade and loan payables and receivables denominated in foreign currencies . these contracts are recorded at fair value with the gain or loss recognized in other 2014net . the purchased option contracts are used to hedge anticipated foreign currency transactions , primarily intercompany inventory activities expected to occur within the next year . these contracts are designated as cash fl ow hedges of those future transactions and the impact on earnings is included in cost of sales . we may enter into foreign currency forward contracts and currency swaps as fair value hedges of fi rm commitments . forward and option contracts generally have maturities not exceeding 12 months . in the normal course of business , our operations are exposed to fl uctuations in interest rates . these fl uctuations can vary the costs of fi nancing , investing , and operating . we address a portion of these risks through a controlled program of risk management that includes the use of derivative fi nancial instruments . the objective of controlling these risks is to limit the impact of fl uctuations in interest rates on earnings . our primary interest rate risk exposure results from changes in short-term u.s . dollar interest rates . in an effort to manage interest rate exposures , we strive to achieve an acceptable balance between fi xed and fl oating rate debt and investment positions and may enter into interest rate swaps or collars to help maintain that balance . interest rate swaps or collars that convert our fi xed- rate debt or investments to a fl oating rate are designated as fair value hedges of the underlying instruments . interest rate swaps or collars that convert fl oating rate debt or investments to a fi xed rate are designated as cash fl ow hedg- es . interest expense on the debt is adjusted to include the payments made or received under the swap agreements . goodwill and other intangibles : goodwill is not amortized . all other intangibles arising from acquisitions and research alliances have fi nite lives and are amortized over their estimated useful lives , ranging from 5 to 20 years , using the straight-line method . the weighted-average amortization period for developed product technology is approximately 12 years . amortization expense for 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 was $ 193.4 million , $ 172.8 million , and $ 7.6 million before tax , respectively . the estimated amortization expense for each of the fi ve succeeding years approximates $ 280 million before tax , per year . substantially all of the amortization expense is included in cost of sales . see note 3 for further discussion of goodwill and other intangibles acquired in 2008 and 2007 . goodwill and other intangible assets at december 31 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 1167.5</td><td>$ 745.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>developed product technology 2014 gross</td><td>3035.4</td><td>1767.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-346.6 ( 346.6 )</td><td>-162.6 ( 162.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>developed product technology 2014 net</td><td>2688.8</td><td>1604.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other intangibles 2014 gross</td><td>243.2</td><td>142.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-45.4 ( 45.4 )</td><td>-38.0 ( 38.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other intangibles 2014 net</td><td>197.8</td><td>104.8</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total intangibles 2014 net</td><td>$ 4054.1</td><td>$ 2455.4</td></tr></table> goodwill and net other intangibles are reviewed to assess recoverability at least annually and when certain impairment indicators are present . no signifi cant impairments occurred with respect to the carrying value of our goodwill or other intangible assets in 2008 , 2007 , or 2006 . property and equipment : property and equipment is stated on the basis of cost . provisions for depreciation of buildings and equipment are computed generally by the straight-line method at rates based on their estimated useful lives ( 12 to 50 years for buildings and 3 to 18 years for equipment ) . we review the carrying value of long-lived assets for potential impairment on a periodic basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the .
Question: what was the difference in amortization expense between 2007 and 2008?
| 20.6 |
CONVFINQA5214 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
on the underlying exposure . for derivative contracts that are designated and qualify as cash fl ow hedges , the effective portion of gains and losses on these contracts is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassifi ed into earnings in the same period the hedged transaction affects earnings . hedge ineffectiveness is immediately recognized in earnings . derivative contracts that are not designated as hedging instruments are recorded at fair value with the gain or loss recognized in current earnings during the period of change . we may enter into foreign currency forward and option contracts to reduce the effect of fl uctuating currency exchange rates ( principally the euro , the british pound , and the japanese yen ) . foreign currency derivatives used for hedging are put in place using the same or like currencies and duration as the underlying exposures . forward contracts are principally used to manage exposures arising from subsidiary trade and loan payables and receivables denominated in foreign currencies . these contracts are recorded at fair value with the gain or loss recognized in other 2014net . the purchased option contracts are used to hedge anticipated foreign currency transactions , primarily intercompany inventory activities expected to occur within the next year . these contracts are designated as cash fl ow hedges of those future transactions and the impact on earnings is included in cost of sales . we may enter into foreign currency forward contracts and currency swaps as fair value hedges of fi rm commitments . forward and option contracts generally have maturities not exceeding 12 months . in the normal course of business , our operations are exposed to fl uctuations in interest rates . these fl uctuations can vary the costs of fi nancing , investing , and operating . we address a portion of these risks through a controlled program of risk management that includes the use of derivative fi nancial instruments . the objective of controlling these risks is to limit the impact of fl uctuations in interest rates on earnings . our primary interest rate risk exposure results from changes in short-term u.s . dollar interest rates . in an effort to manage interest rate exposures , we strive to achieve an acceptable balance between fi xed and fl oating rate debt and investment positions and may enter into interest rate swaps or collars to help maintain that balance . interest rate swaps or collars that convert our fi xed- rate debt or investments to a fl oating rate are designated as fair value hedges of the underlying instruments . interest rate swaps or collars that convert fl oating rate debt or investments to a fi xed rate are designated as cash fl ow hedg- es . interest expense on the debt is adjusted to include the payments made or received under the swap agreements . goodwill and other intangibles : goodwill is not amortized . all other intangibles arising from acquisitions and research alliances have fi nite lives and are amortized over their estimated useful lives , ranging from 5 to 20 years , using the straight-line method . the weighted-average amortization period for developed product technology is approximately 12 years . amortization expense for 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 was $ 193.4 million , $ 172.8 million , and $ 7.6 million before tax , respectively . the estimated amortization expense for each of the fi ve succeeding years approximates $ 280 million before tax , per year . substantially all of the amortization expense is included in cost of sales . see note 3 for further discussion of goodwill and other intangibles acquired in 2008 and 2007 . goodwill and other intangible assets at december 31 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 1167.5</td><td>$ 745.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>developed product technology 2014 gross</td><td>3035.4</td><td>1767.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-346.6 ( 346.6 )</td><td>-162.6 ( 162.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>developed product technology 2014 net</td><td>2688.8</td><td>1604.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other intangibles 2014 gross</td><td>243.2</td><td>142.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-45.4 ( 45.4 )</td><td>-38.0 ( 38.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other intangibles 2014 net</td><td>197.8</td><td>104.8</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total intangibles 2014 net</td><td>$ 4054.1</td><td>$ 2455.4</td></tr></table> goodwill and net other intangibles are reviewed to assess recoverability at least annually and when certain impairment indicators are present . no signifi cant impairments occurred with respect to the carrying value of our goodwill or other intangible assets in 2008 , 2007 , or 2006 . property and equipment : property and equipment is stated on the basis of cost . provisions for depreciation of buildings and equipment are computed generally by the straight-line method at rates based on their estimated useful lives ( 12 to 50 years for buildings and 3 to 18 years for equipment ) . we review the carrying value of long-lived assets for potential impairment on a periodic basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the .
Question: what was the difference in amortization expense between 2007 and 2008?
Answer: 20.6
Question: and the value for 2007 specifically?
| 172.8 |
CONVFINQA5215 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
on the underlying exposure . for derivative contracts that are designated and qualify as cash fl ow hedges , the effective portion of gains and losses on these contracts is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassifi ed into earnings in the same period the hedged transaction affects earnings . hedge ineffectiveness is immediately recognized in earnings . derivative contracts that are not designated as hedging instruments are recorded at fair value with the gain or loss recognized in current earnings during the period of change . we may enter into foreign currency forward and option contracts to reduce the effect of fl uctuating currency exchange rates ( principally the euro , the british pound , and the japanese yen ) . foreign currency derivatives used for hedging are put in place using the same or like currencies and duration as the underlying exposures . forward contracts are principally used to manage exposures arising from subsidiary trade and loan payables and receivables denominated in foreign currencies . these contracts are recorded at fair value with the gain or loss recognized in other 2014net . the purchased option contracts are used to hedge anticipated foreign currency transactions , primarily intercompany inventory activities expected to occur within the next year . these contracts are designated as cash fl ow hedges of those future transactions and the impact on earnings is included in cost of sales . we may enter into foreign currency forward contracts and currency swaps as fair value hedges of fi rm commitments . forward and option contracts generally have maturities not exceeding 12 months . in the normal course of business , our operations are exposed to fl uctuations in interest rates . these fl uctuations can vary the costs of fi nancing , investing , and operating . we address a portion of these risks through a controlled program of risk management that includes the use of derivative fi nancial instruments . the objective of controlling these risks is to limit the impact of fl uctuations in interest rates on earnings . our primary interest rate risk exposure results from changes in short-term u.s . dollar interest rates . in an effort to manage interest rate exposures , we strive to achieve an acceptable balance between fi xed and fl oating rate debt and investment positions and may enter into interest rate swaps or collars to help maintain that balance . interest rate swaps or collars that convert our fi xed- rate debt or investments to a fl oating rate are designated as fair value hedges of the underlying instruments . interest rate swaps or collars that convert fl oating rate debt or investments to a fi xed rate are designated as cash fl ow hedg- es . interest expense on the debt is adjusted to include the payments made or received under the swap agreements . goodwill and other intangibles : goodwill is not amortized . all other intangibles arising from acquisitions and research alliances have fi nite lives and are amortized over their estimated useful lives , ranging from 5 to 20 years , using the straight-line method . the weighted-average amortization period for developed product technology is approximately 12 years . amortization expense for 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 was $ 193.4 million , $ 172.8 million , and $ 7.6 million before tax , respectively . the estimated amortization expense for each of the fi ve succeeding years approximates $ 280 million before tax , per year . substantially all of the amortization expense is included in cost of sales . see note 3 for further discussion of goodwill and other intangibles acquired in 2008 and 2007 . goodwill and other intangible assets at december 31 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 1167.5</td><td>$ 745.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>developed product technology 2014 gross</td><td>3035.4</td><td>1767.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-346.6 ( 346.6 )</td><td>-162.6 ( 162.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>developed product technology 2014 net</td><td>2688.8</td><td>1604.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other intangibles 2014 gross</td><td>243.2</td><td>142.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-45.4 ( 45.4 )</td><td>-38.0 ( 38.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other intangibles 2014 net</td><td>197.8</td><td>104.8</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total intangibles 2014 net</td><td>$ 4054.1</td><td>$ 2455.4</td></tr></table> goodwill and net other intangibles are reviewed to assess recoverability at least annually and when certain impairment indicators are present . no signifi cant impairments occurred with respect to the carrying value of our goodwill or other intangible assets in 2008 , 2007 , or 2006 . property and equipment : property and equipment is stated on the basis of cost . provisions for depreciation of buildings and equipment are computed generally by the straight-line method at rates based on their estimated useful lives ( 12 to 50 years for buildings and 3 to 18 years for equipment ) . we review the carrying value of long-lived assets for potential impairment on a periodic basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the .
Question: what was the difference in amortization expense between 2007 and 2008?
Answer: 20.6
Question: and the value for 2007 specifically?
Answer: 172.8
Question: so what was the growth rate over these two years?
| 0.11921 |
CONVFINQA5216 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , netherland , sewell & associates , inc . ( "nsai" ) prepared a certification of the prior year's reserves for the alba field in e.g . the nsai summary reports are filed as an exhibit to this annual report on form 10-k . members of the nsai team have multiple years of industry experience , having worked for large , international oil and gas companies before joining nsai . the senior technical advisor has over 35 years of practical experience in petroleum geosciences , with over 15 years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . the second team member has over 10 years of practical experience in petroleum engineering , with 5 years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . both are registered professional engineers in the state of texas . ryder scott company ( "ryder scott" ) also performed audits of the prior years' reserves of several of our fields in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 . their summary reports are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead for ryder scott has over 20 years of industry experience , having worked for a major international oil and gas company before joining ryder scott . he is a member of spe , where he served on the oil and gas reserves committee , and is a registered professional engineer in the state of texas . changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2014 , 728 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , an increase of 101 mmboe from december 31 , 2013 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2014 : ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>627</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revisions of previous estimates</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>improved recovery</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases of reserves in place</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>extensions discoveries and other additions</td><td>227</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dispositions</td><td>-29 ( 29 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>transfers to proved developed</td><td>-103 ( 103 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>end of year</td><td>728</td></tr></table> significant additions to proved undeveloped reserves during 2014 included 121 mmboe in the eagle ford and 61 mmboe in the bakken shale plays due to development drilling . transfers from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves included 67 mmboe in the eagle ford , 26 mmboe in the bakken and 1 mmboe in the oklahoma resource basins due to development drilling and completions . costs incurred in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 3149 million , $ 2536 million and $ 1995 million . a total of 102 mmboe was booked as extensions , discoveries or other additions due to the application of reliable technology . technologies included statistical analysis of production performance , decline curve analysis , pressure and rate transient analysis , reservoir simulation and volumetric analysis . the statistical nature of production performance coupled with highly certain reservoir continuity or quality within the reliable technology areas and sufficient proved undeveloped locations establish the reasonable certainty criteria required for booking proved reserves . projects can remain in proved undeveloped reserves for extended periods in certain situations such as large development projects which take more than five years to complete , or the timing of when additional gas compression is needed . of the 728 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at december 31 , 2014 , 19 percent of the volume is associated with projects that have been included in proved reserves for more than five years . the majority of this volume is related to a compression project in e.g . that was sanctioned by our board of directors in 2004 . the timing of the installation of compression is being driven by the reservoir performance with this project intended to maintain maximum production levels . performance of this field since the board sanctioned the project has far exceeded expectations . estimates of initial dry gas in place increased by roughly 10 percent between 2004 and 2010 . during 2012 , the compression project received the approval of the e.g . government , allowing design and planning work to progress towards implementation , with completion expected by mid-2016 . the other component of alba proved undeveloped reserves is an infill well approved in 2013 and to be drilled in the second quarter of 2015 . proved undeveloped reserves for the north gialo development , located in the libyan sahara desert , were booked for the first time in 2010 . this development , which is anticipated to take more than five years to develop , is executed by the operator and encompasses a multi-year drilling program including the design , fabrication and installation of extensive liquid handling and gas recycling facilities . anecdotal evidence from similar development projects in the region lead to an expected project execution time frame of more than five years from the time the reserves were initially booked . interruptions associated with the civil unrest in 2011 and third-party labor strikes and civil unrest in 2013-2014 have also extended the project duration . as of december 31 , 2014 , future development costs estimated to be required for the development of proved undeveloped crude oil and condensate , ngls , natural gas and synthetic crude oil reserves related to continuing operations for the years 2015 through 2019 are projected to be $ 2915 million , $ 2598 million , $ 2493 million , $ 2669 million and $ 2745 million. .
Question: what were costs incurred for the development of proved undeveloped reserves in 2014?
| 3149.0 |
CONVFINQA5217 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , netherland , sewell & associates , inc . ( "nsai" ) prepared a certification of the prior year's reserves for the alba field in e.g . the nsai summary reports are filed as an exhibit to this annual report on form 10-k . members of the nsai team have multiple years of industry experience , having worked for large , international oil and gas companies before joining nsai . the senior technical advisor has over 35 years of practical experience in petroleum geosciences , with over 15 years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . the second team member has over 10 years of practical experience in petroleum engineering , with 5 years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . both are registered professional engineers in the state of texas . ryder scott company ( "ryder scott" ) also performed audits of the prior years' reserves of several of our fields in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 . their summary reports are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead for ryder scott has over 20 years of industry experience , having worked for a major international oil and gas company before joining ryder scott . he is a member of spe , where he served on the oil and gas reserves committee , and is a registered professional engineer in the state of texas . changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2014 , 728 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , an increase of 101 mmboe from december 31 , 2013 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2014 : ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>627</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revisions of previous estimates</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>improved recovery</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases of reserves in place</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>extensions discoveries and other additions</td><td>227</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dispositions</td><td>-29 ( 29 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>transfers to proved developed</td><td>-103 ( 103 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>end of year</td><td>728</td></tr></table> significant additions to proved undeveloped reserves during 2014 included 121 mmboe in the eagle ford and 61 mmboe in the bakken shale plays due to development drilling . transfers from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves included 67 mmboe in the eagle ford , 26 mmboe in the bakken and 1 mmboe in the oklahoma resource basins due to development drilling and completions . costs incurred in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 3149 million , $ 2536 million and $ 1995 million . a total of 102 mmboe was booked as extensions , discoveries or other additions due to the application of reliable technology . technologies included statistical analysis of production performance , decline curve analysis , pressure and rate transient analysis , reservoir simulation and volumetric analysis . the statistical nature of production performance coupled with highly certain reservoir continuity or quality within the reliable technology areas and sufficient proved undeveloped locations establish the reasonable certainty criteria required for booking proved reserves . projects can remain in proved undeveloped reserves for extended periods in certain situations such as large development projects which take more than five years to complete , or the timing of when additional gas compression is needed . of the 728 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at december 31 , 2014 , 19 percent of the volume is associated with projects that have been included in proved reserves for more than five years . the majority of this volume is related to a compression project in e.g . that was sanctioned by our board of directors in 2004 . the timing of the installation of compression is being driven by the reservoir performance with this project intended to maintain maximum production levels . performance of this field since the board sanctioned the project has far exceeded expectations . estimates of initial dry gas in place increased by roughly 10 percent between 2004 and 2010 . during 2012 , the compression project received the approval of the e.g . government , allowing design and planning work to progress towards implementation , with completion expected by mid-2016 . the other component of alba proved undeveloped reserves is an infill well approved in 2013 and to be drilled in the second quarter of 2015 . proved undeveloped reserves for the north gialo development , located in the libyan sahara desert , were booked for the first time in 2010 . this development , which is anticipated to take more than five years to develop , is executed by the operator and encompasses a multi-year drilling program including the design , fabrication and installation of extensive liquid handling and gas recycling facilities . anecdotal evidence from similar development projects in the region lead to an expected project execution time frame of more than five years from the time the reserves were initially booked . interruptions associated with the civil unrest in 2011 and third-party labor strikes and civil unrest in 2013-2014 have also extended the project duration . as of december 31 , 2014 , future development costs estimated to be required for the development of proved undeveloped crude oil and condensate , ngls , natural gas and synthetic crude oil reserves related to continuing operations for the years 2015 through 2019 are projected to be $ 2915 million , $ 2598 million , $ 2493 million , $ 2669 million and $ 2745 million. .
Question: what were costs incurred for the development of proved undeveloped reserves in 2014?
Answer: 3149.0
Question: what were the costs in 2013?
| 2536.0 |
CONVFINQA5218 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , netherland , sewell & associates , inc . ( "nsai" ) prepared a certification of the prior year's reserves for the alba field in e.g . the nsai summary reports are filed as an exhibit to this annual report on form 10-k . members of the nsai team have multiple years of industry experience , having worked for large , international oil and gas companies before joining nsai . the senior technical advisor has over 35 years of practical experience in petroleum geosciences , with over 15 years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . the second team member has over 10 years of practical experience in petroleum engineering , with 5 years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . both are registered professional engineers in the state of texas . ryder scott company ( "ryder scott" ) also performed audits of the prior years' reserves of several of our fields in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 . their summary reports are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead for ryder scott has over 20 years of industry experience , having worked for a major international oil and gas company before joining ryder scott . he is a member of spe , where he served on the oil and gas reserves committee , and is a registered professional engineer in the state of texas . changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2014 , 728 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , an increase of 101 mmboe from december 31 , 2013 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2014 : ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>627</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revisions of previous estimates</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>improved recovery</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases of reserves in place</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>extensions discoveries and other additions</td><td>227</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dispositions</td><td>-29 ( 29 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>transfers to proved developed</td><td>-103 ( 103 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>end of year</td><td>728</td></tr></table> significant additions to proved undeveloped reserves during 2014 included 121 mmboe in the eagle ford and 61 mmboe in the bakken shale plays due to development drilling . transfers from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves included 67 mmboe in the eagle ford , 26 mmboe in the bakken and 1 mmboe in the oklahoma resource basins due to development drilling and completions . costs incurred in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 3149 million , $ 2536 million and $ 1995 million . a total of 102 mmboe was booked as extensions , discoveries or other additions due to the application of reliable technology . technologies included statistical analysis of production performance , decline curve analysis , pressure and rate transient analysis , reservoir simulation and volumetric analysis . the statistical nature of production performance coupled with highly certain reservoir continuity or quality within the reliable technology areas and sufficient proved undeveloped locations establish the reasonable certainty criteria required for booking proved reserves . projects can remain in proved undeveloped reserves for extended periods in certain situations such as large development projects which take more than five years to complete , or the timing of when additional gas compression is needed . of the 728 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at december 31 , 2014 , 19 percent of the volume is associated with projects that have been included in proved reserves for more than five years . the majority of this volume is related to a compression project in e.g . that was sanctioned by our board of directors in 2004 . the timing of the installation of compression is being driven by the reservoir performance with this project intended to maintain maximum production levels . performance of this field since the board sanctioned the project has far exceeded expectations . estimates of initial dry gas in place increased by roughly 10 percent between 2004 and 2010 . during 2012 , the compression project received the approval of the e.g . government , allowing design and planning work to progress towards implementation , with completion expected by mid-2016 . the other component of alba proved undeveloped reserves is an infill well approved in 2013 and to be drilled in the second quarter of 2015 . proved undeveloped reserves for the north gialo development , located in the libyan sahara desert , were booked for the first time in 2010 . this development , which is anticipated to take more than five years to develop , is executed by the operator and encompasses a multi-year drilling program including the design , fabrication and installation of extensive liquid handling and gas recycling facilities . anecdotal evidence from similar development projects in the region lead to an expected project execution time frame of more than five years from the time the reserves were initially booked . interruptions associated with the civil unrest in 2011 and third-party labor strikes and civil unrest in 2013-2014 have also extended the project duration . as of december 31 , 2014 , future development costs estimated to be required for the development of proved undeveloped crude oil and condensate , ngls , natural gas and synthetic crude oil reserves related to continuing operations for the years 2015 through 2019 are projected to be $ 2915 million , $ 2598 million , $ 2493 million , $ 2669 million and $ 2745 million. .
Question: what were costs incurred for the development of proved undeveloped reserves in 2014?
Answer: 3149.0
Question: what were the costs in 2013?
Answer: 2536.0
Question: what is the sum?
| 5685.0 |
CONVFINQA5219 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , netherland , sewell & associates , inc . ( "nsai" ) prepared a certification of the prior year's reserves for the alba field in e.g . the nsai summary reports are filed as an exhibit to this annual report on form 10-k . members of the nsai team have multiple years of industry experience , having worked for large , international oil and gas companies before joining nsai . the senior technical advisor has over 35 years of practical experience in petroleum geosciences , with over 15 years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . the second team member has over 10 years of practical experience in petroleum engineering , with 5 years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . both are registered professional engineers in the state of texas . ryder scott company ( "ryder scott" ) also performed audits of the prior years' reserves of several of our fields in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 . their summary reports are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead for ryder scott has over 20 years of industry experience , having worked for a major international oil and gas company before joining ryder scott . he is a member of spe , where he served on the oil and gas reserves committee , and is a registered professional engineer in the state of texas . changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2014 , 728 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , an increase of 101 mmboe from december 31 , 2013 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2014 : ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>627</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revisions of previous estimates</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>improved recovery</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases of reserves in place</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>extensions discoveries and other additions</td><td>227</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dispositions</td><td>-29 ( 29 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>transfers to proved developed</td><td>-103 ( 103 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>end of year</td><td>728</td></tr></table> significant additions to proved undeveloped reserves during 2014 included 121 mmboe in the eagle ford and 61 mmboe in the bakken shale plays due to development drilling . transfers from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves included 67 mmboe in the eagle ford , 26 mmboe in the bakken and 1 mmboe in the oklahoma resource basins due to development drilling and completions . costs incurred in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 3149 million , $ 2536 million and $ 1995 million . a total of 102 mmboe was booked as extensions , discoveries or other additions due to the application of reliable technology . technologies included statistical analysis of production performance , decline curve analysis , pressure and rate transient analysis , reservoir simulation and volumetric analysis . the statistical nature of production performance coupled with highly certain reservoir continuity or quality within the reliable technology areas and sufficient proved undeveloped locations establish the reasonable certainty criteria required for booking proved reserves . projects can remain in proved undeveloped reserves for extended periods in certain situations such as large development projects which take more than five years to complete , or the timing of when additional gas compression is needed . of the 728 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at december 31 , 2014 , 19 percent of the volume is associated with projects that have been included in proved reserves for more than five years . the majority of this volume is related to a compression project in e.g . that was sanctioned by our board of directors in 2004 . the timing of the installation of compression is being driven by the reservoir performance with this project intended to maintain maximum production levels . performance of this field since the board sanctioned the project has far exceeded expectations . estimates of initial dry gas in place increased by roughly 10 percent between 2004 and 2010 . during 2012 , the compression project received the approval of the e.g . government , allowing design and planning work to progress towards implementation , with completion expected by mid-2016 . the other component of alba proved undeveloped reserves is an infill well approved in 2013 and to be drilled in the second quarter of 2015 . proved undeveloped reserves for the north gialo development , located in the libyan sahara desert , were booked for the first time in 2010 . this development , which is anticipated to take more than five years to develop , is executed by the operator and encompasses a multi-year drilling program including the design , fabrication and installation of extensive liquid handling and gas recycling facilities . anecdotal evidence from similar development projects in the region lead to an expected project execution time frame of more than five years from the time the reserves were initially booked . interruptions associated with the civil unrest in 2011 and third-party labor strikes and civil unrest in 2013-2014 have also extended the project duration . as of december 31 , 2014 , future development costs estimated to be required for the development of proved undeveloped crude oil and condensate , ngls , natural gas and synthetic crude oil reserves related to continuing operations for the years 2015 through 2019 are projected to be $ 2915 million , $ 2598 million , $ 2493 million , $ 2669 million and $ 2745 million. .
Question: what were costs incurred for the development of proved undeveloped reserves in 2014?
Answer: 3149.0
Question: what were the costs in 2013?
Answer: 2536.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 5685.0
Question: what were the costs in 2012?
| 1995.0 |
CONVFINQA5220 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , netherland , sewell & associates , inc . ( "nsai" ) prepared a certification of the prior year's reserves for the alba field in e.g . the nsai summary reports are filed as an exhibit to this annual report on form 10-k . members of the nsai team have multiple years of industry experience , having worked for large , international oil and gas companies before joining nsai . the senior technical advisor has over 35 years of practical experience in petroleum geosciences , with over 15 years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . the second team member has over 10 years of practical experience in petroleum engineering , with 5 years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . both are registered professional engineers in the state of texas . ryder scott company ( "ryder scott" ) also performed audits of the prior years' reserves of several of our fields in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 . their summary reports are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead for ryder scott has over 20 years of industry experience , having worked for a major international oil and gas company before joining ryder scott . he is a member of spe , where he served on the oil and gas reserves committee , and is a registered professional engineer in the state of texas . changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2014 , 728 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , an increase of 101 mmboe from december 31 , 2013 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2014 : ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>627</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revisions of previous estimates</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>improved recovery</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases of reserves in place</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>extensions discoveries and other additions</td><td>227</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dispositions</td><td>-29 ( 29 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>transfers to proved developed</td><td>-103 ( 103 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>end of year</td><td>728</td></tr></table> significant additions to proved undeveloped reserves during 2014 included 121 mmboe in the eagle ford and 61 mmboe in the bakken shale plays due to development drilling . transfers from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves included 67 mmboe in the eagle ford , 26 mmboe in the bakken and 1 mmboe in the oklahoma resource basins due to development drilling and completions . costs incurred in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 3149 million , $ 2536 million and $ 1995 million . a total of 102 mmboe was booked as extensions , discoveries or other additions due to the application of reliable technology . technologies included statistical analysis of production performance , decline curve analysis , pressure and rate transient analysis , reservoir simulation and volumetric analysis . the statistical nature of production performance coupled with highly certain reservoir continuity or quality within the reliable technology areas and sufficient proved undeveloped locations establish the reasonable certainty criteria required for booking proved reserves . projects can remain in proved undeveloped reserves for extended periods in certain situations such as large development projects which take more than five years to complete , or the timing of when additional gas compression is needed . of the 728 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at december 31 , 2014 , 19 percent of the volume is associated with projects that have been included in proved reserves for more than five years . the majority of this volume is related to a compression project in e.g . that was sanctioned by our board of directors in 2004 . the timing of the installation of compression is being driven by the reservoir performance with this project intended to maintain maximum production levels . performance of this field since the board sanctioned the project has far exceeded expectations . estimates of initial dry gas in place increased by roughly 10 percent between 2004 and 2010 . during 2012 , the compression project received the approval of the e.g . government , allowing design and planning work to progress towards implementation , with completion expected by mid-2016 . the other component of alba proved undeveloped reserves is an infill well approved in 2013 and to be drilled in the second quarter of 2015 . proved undeveloped reserves for the north gialo development , located in the libyan sahara desert , were booked for the first time in 2010 . this development , which is anticipated to take more than five years to develop , is executed by the operator and encompasses a multi-year drilling program including the design , fabrication and installation of extensive liquid handling and gas recycling facilities . anecdotal evidence from similar development projects in the region lead to an expected project execution time frame of more than five years from the time the reserves were initially booked . interruptions associated with the civil unrest in 2011 and third-party labor strikes and civil unrest in 2013-2014 have also extended the project duration . as of december 31 , 2014 , future development costs estimated to be required for the development of proved undeveloped crude oil and condensate , ngls , natural gas and synthetic crude oil reserves related to continuing operations for the years 2015 through 2019 are projected to be $ 2915 million , $ 2598 million , $ 2493 million , $ 2669 million and $ 2745 million. .
Question: what were costs incurred for the development of proved undeveloped reserves in 2014?
Answer: 3149.0
Question: what were the costs in 2013?
Answer: 2536.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 5685.0
Question: what were the costs in 2012?
Answer: 1995.0
Question: what is the total sum?
| 7680.0 |
CONVFINQA5221 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
realignment and other 201d expenses . acquisition , integration , realignment and other expenses for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , included ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>adjustment or impairment of acquired assets and obligations net</td><td>$ -1.5 ( 1.5 )</td><td>$ -10.4 ( 10.4 )</td><td>$ -1.2 ( 1.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>consulting and professional fees</td><td>11.7</td><td>13.2</td><td>1.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>employee severance and retention including share-based compensation acceleration</td><td>19.0</td><td>0.2</td><td>1.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>information technology integration</td><td>1.1</td><td>0.7</td><td>2.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>in-process research & development</td><td>2013</td><td>38.5</td><td>6.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>vacated facilities</td><td>1.4</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>facility and employee relocation</td><td>5.4</td><td>7.5</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>distributor acquisitions</td><td>1.1</td><td>6.9</td><td>4.1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>certain litigation matters</td><td>23.4</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>contract terminations</td><td>9.4</td><td>5.7</td><td>5.4</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>other</td><td>4.3</td><td>6.2</td><td>5.2</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>acquisition integration realignment and other</td><td>$ 75.3</td><td>$ 68.5</td><td>$ 25.2</td></tr></table> adjustment or impairment of acquired assets and obligations relates to impairment on assets that were acquired in business combinations or adjustments to certain liabilities of acquired companies due to changes in circumstances surrounding those liabilities subsequent to the related measurement period . consulting and professional fees relate to third-party integration consulting performed in a variety of areas such as tax , compliance , logistics and human resources and include third-party fees related to severance and termination benefits matters . these fees also include legal fees related to litigation matters involving acquired businesses that existed prior to our acquisition or resulted from our acquisition . during 2009 , we commenced a global realignment initiative to focus on business opportunities that best support our strategic priorities . as part of this realignment , we initiated changes in our work force , eliminating positions in some areas and increasing others . approximately 300 employees from across the globe were affected by these actions . as a result of these changes in our work force and headcount reductions from acquisitions , we recorded expense of $ 19.0 million related to severance and other employee termination-related costs . these termination benefits were provided in accordance with our existing or local government policies and are considered ongoing benefits . these costs were accrued when they became probable and estimable and were recorded as part of other current liabilities . the majority of these costs were paid during 2009 . information technology integration relates to the non- capitalizable costs associated with integrating the information systems of acquired businesses . in-process research and development charges for 2008 relate to the acquisition of abbott spine . in-process research and development charges for 2007 relate to the acquisitions of endius and orthosoft . in 2009 , we ceased using certain leased facilities and , accordingly , recorded expense for the remaining lease payments , less estimated sublease recoveries , and wrote-off any assets being used in those facilities . facility and employee relocation relates to costs associated with relocating certain facilities . most notably , we consolidated our legacy european distribution centers into a new distribution center in eschbach , germany . over the past three years we have acquired a number of u.s . and foreign-based distributors . we have incurred various costs related to the acquisition and integration of those businesses . certain litigation matters relate to costs recognized during the year for the estimated or actual settlement of various legal matters , including patent litigation matters , commercial litigation matters and matters arising from our acquisitions of certain competitive distributorships in prior years . we recognize expense for the potential settlement of a legal matter when we believe it is probable that a loss has been incurred and we can reasonably estimate the loss . in 2009 , we made a concerted effort to settle many of these matters to avoid further litigation costs . contract termination costs relate to terminated agreements in connection with the integration of acquired companies . the terminated contracts primarily relate to sales agents and distribution agreements . cash and cash equivalents 2013 we consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents . the carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents are valued at cost , which approximates their fair value . certificates of deposit 2013 we invest in cash deposits with original maturities greater than three months and classify these investments as certificates of deposit on our consolidated balance sheet . the carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for certificates of deposit are valued at cost , which approximates their fair value . inventories 2013 inventories , net of allowances for obsolete and slow-moving goods , are stated at the lower of cost or market , with cost determined on a first-in first-out basis . property , plant and equipment 2013 property , plant and equipment is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation . depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives of ten to forty years for buildings and improvements and three to eight years for machinery and equipment . maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred . we review property , plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable . an impairment loss would be recognized when estimated future undiscounted cash flows relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount . an impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its fair value . z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 9 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c55340 pcn : 043000000 ***%%pcmsg|43 |00008|yes|no|02/24/2010 01:32|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: what is the net change in consulting and professional fees from 2008 to 2009?
| 1.5 |
CONVFINQA5222 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
realignment and other 201d expenses . acquisition , integration , realignment and other expenses for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , included ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>adjustment or impairment of acquired assets and obligations net</td><td>$ -1.5 ( 1.5 )</td><td>$ -10.4 ( 10.4 )</td><td>$ -1.2 ( 1.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>consulting and professional fees</td><td>11.7</td><td>13.2</td><td>1.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>employee severance and retention including share-based compensation acceleration</td><td>19.0</td><td>0.2</td><td>1.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>information technology integration</td><td>1.1</td><td>0.7</td><td>2.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>in-process research & development</td><td>2013</td><td>38.5</td><td>6.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>vacated facilities</td><td>1.4</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>facility and employee relocation</td><td>5.4</td><td>7.5</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>distributor acquisitions</td><td>1.1</td><td>6.9</td><td>4.1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>certain litigation matters</td><td>23.4</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>contract terminations</td><td>9.4</td><td>5.7</td><td>5.4</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>other</td><td>4.3</td><td>6.2</td><td>5.2</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>acquisition integration realignment and other</td><td>$ 75.3</td><td>$ 68.5</td><td>$ 25.2</td></tr></table> adjustment or impairment of acquired assets and obligations relates to impairment on assets that were acquired in business combinations or adjustments to certain liabilities of acquired companies due to changes in circumstances surrounding those liabilities subsequent to the related measurement period . consulting and professional fees relate to third-party integration consulting performed in a variety of areas such as tax , compliance , logistics and human resources and include third-party fees related to severance and termination benefits matters . these fees also include legal fees related to litigation matters involving acquired businesses that existed prior to our acquisition or resulted from our acquisition . during 2009 , we commenced a global realignment initiative to focus on business opportunities that best support our strategic priorities . as part of this realignment , we initiated changes in our work force , eliminating positions in some areas and increasing others . approximately 300 employees from across the globe were affected by these actions . as a result of these changes in our work force and headcount reductions from acquisitions , we recorded expense of $ 19.0 million related to severance and other employee termination-related costs . these termination benefits were provided in accordance with our existing or local government policies and are considered ongoing benefits . these costs were accrued when they became probable and estimable and were recorded as part of other current liabilities . the majority of these costs were paid during 2009 . information technology integration relates to the non- capitalizable costs associated with integrating the information systems of acquired businesses . in-process research and development charges for 2008 relate to the acquisition of abbott spine . in-process research and development charges for 2007 relate to the acquisitions of endius and orthosoft . in 2009 , we ceased using certain leased facilities and , accordingly , recorded expense for the remaining lease payments , less estimated sublease recoveries , and wrote-off any assets being used in those facilities . facility and employee relocation relates to costs associated with relocating certain facilities . most notably , we consolidated our legacy european distribution centers into a new distribution center in eschbach , germany . over the past three years we have acquired a number of u.s . and foreign-based distributors . we have incurred various costs related to the acquisition and integration of those businesses . certain litigation matters relate to costs recognized during the year for the estimated or actual settlement of various legal matters , including patent litigation matters , commercial litigation matters and matters arising from our acquisitions of certain competitive distributorships in prior years . we recognize expense for the potential settlement of a legal matter when we believe it is probable that a loss has been incurred and we can reasonably estimate the loss . in 2009 , we made a concerted effort to settle many of these matters to avoid further litigation costs . contract termination costs relate to terminated agreements in connection with the integration of acquired companies . the terminated contracts primarily relate to sales agents and distribution agreements . cash and cash equivalents 2013 we consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents . the carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents are valued at cost , which approximates their fair value . certificates of deposit 2013 we invest in cash deposits with original maturities greater than three months and classify these investments as certificates of deposit on our consolidated balance sheet . the carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for certificates of deposit are valued at cost , which approximates their fair value . inventories 2013 inventories , net of allowances for obsolete and slow-moving goods , are stated at the lower of cost or market , with cost determined on a first-in first-out basis . property , plant and equipment 2013 property , plant and equipment is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation . depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives of ten to forty years for buildings and improvements and three to eight years for machinery and equipment . maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred . we review property , plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable . an impairment loss would be recognized when estimated future undiscounted cash flows relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount . an impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its fair value . z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 9 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c55340 pcn : 043000000 ***%%pcmsg|43 |00008|yes|no|02/24/2010 01:32|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: what is the net change in consulting and professional fees from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 1.5
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.12821 |
CONVFINQA5223 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following is a list of distribution locations including the approximate square footage and if the location is leased or owned: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>distribution facility location</td><td>approximate square footage</td><td>owned/leased facility</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>frankfort new york ( a )</td><td>924000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>franklin kentucky</td><td>833000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>pendleton indiana</td><td>764000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>macon georgia</td><td>684000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>waco texas</td><td>666000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>casa grande arizona</td><td>650000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>hagerstown maryland ( b )</td><td>482000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>hagerstown maryland ( b )</td><td>309000</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>waverly nebraska</td><td>592000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>seguin texas ( c )</td><td>71000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>lakewood washington</td><td>64000</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>longview texas ( c )</td><td>63000</td><td>owned</td></tr></table> longview , texas ( c ) 63000 owned ( a ) the frankfort , new york , distribution center began receiving merchandise in fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 , and is expected to begin shipping merchandise to stores in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 . ( b ) the leased distribution center in hagerstown is treated as an extension of the existing owned hagerstown location and is not considered a separate distribution center . ( c ) this is a mixing center designed to process certain high-volume bulk products . the company 2019s store support center occupies approximately 260000 square feet of owned building space in brentwood , tennessee , and the company 2019s merchandising innovation center occupies approximately 32000 square feet of leased building space in nashville , tennessee . the company also leases approximately 8000 square feet of building space for the petsense corporate headquarters , located in scottsdale , arizona . item 3 . legal proceedings the company is involved in various litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business . the company believes that any estimated loss related to such matters has been adequately provided for in accrued liabilities to the extent probable and reasonably estimable . accordingly , the company currently expects these matters will be resolved without material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .
Question: what is the total of square feet for the facilities of seguin texas and longview texas?
| 134000.0 |
CONVFINQA5224 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following is a list of distribution locations including the approximate square footage and if the location is leased or owned: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>distribution facility location</td><td>approximate square footage</td><td>owned/leased facility</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>frankfort new york ( a )</td><td>924000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>franklin kentucky</td><td>833000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>pendleton indiana</td><td>764000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>macon georgia</td><td>684000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>waco texas</td><td>666000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>casa grande arizona</td><td>650000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>hagerstown maryland ( b )</td><td>482000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>hagerstown maryland ( b )</td><td>309000</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>waverly nebraska</td><td>592000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>seguin texas ( c )</td><td>71000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>lakewood washington</td><td>64000</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>longview texas ( c )</td><td>63000</td><td>owned</td></tr></table> longview , texas ( c ) 63000 owned ( a ) the frankfort , new york , distribution center began receiving merchandise in fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 , and is expected to begin shipping merchandise to stores in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 . ( b ) the leased distribution center in hagerstown is treated as an extension of the existing owned hagerstown location and is not considered a separate distribution center . ( c ) this is a mixing center designed to process certain high-volume bulk products . the company 2019s store support center occupies approximately 260000 square feet of owned building space in brentwood , tennessee , and the company 2019s merchandising innovation center occupies approximately 32000 square feet of leased building space in nashville , tennessee . the company also leases approximately 8000 square feet of building space for the petsense corporate headquarters , located in scottsdale , arizona . item 3 . legal proceedings the company is involved in various litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business . the company believes that any estimated loss related to such matters has been adequately provided for in accrued liabilities to the extent probable and reasonably estimable . accordingly , the company currently expects these matters will be resolved without material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .
Question: what is the total of square feet for the facilities of seguin texas and longview texas?
Answer: 134000.0
Question: and including waco texas, what becomes that total for the entire state?
| 800000.0 |
CONVFINQA5225 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following is a list of distribution locations including the approximate square footage and if the location is leased or owned: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>distribution facility location</td><td>approximate square footage</td><td>owned/leased facility</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>frankfort new york ( a )</td><td>924000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>franklin kentucky</td><td>833000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>pendleton indiana</td><td>764000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>macon georgia</td><td>684000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>waco texas</td><td>666000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>casa grande arizona</td><td>650000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>hagerstown maryland ( b )</td><td>482000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>hagerstown maryland ( b )</td><td>309000</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>waverly nebraska</td><td>592000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>seguin texas ( c )</td><td>71000</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>lakewood washington</td><td>64000</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>longview texas ( c )</td><td>63000</td><td>owned</td></tr></table> longview , texas ( c ) 63000 owned ( a ) the frankfort , new york , distribution center began receiving merchandise in fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 , and is expected to begin shipping merchandise to stores in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 . ( b ) the leased distribution center in hagerstown is treated as an extension of the existing owned hagerstown location and is not considered a separate distribution center . ( c ) this is a mixing center designed to process certain high-volume bulk products . the company 2019s store support center occupies approximately 260000 square feet of owned building space in brentwood , tennessee , and the company 2019s merchandising innovation center occupies approximately 32000 square feet of leased building space in nashville , tennessee . the company also leases approximately 8000 square feet of building space for the petsense corporate headquarters , located in scottsdale , arizona . item 3 . legal proceedings the company is involved in various litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business . the company believes that any estimated loss related to such matters has been adequately provided for in accrued liabilities to the extent probable and reasonably estimable . accordingly , the company currently expects these matters will be resolved without material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .
Question: what is the total of square feet for the facilities of seguin texas and longview texas?
Answer: 134000.0
Question: and including waco texas, what becomes that total for the entire state?
Answer: 800000.0
Question: and concerning that same chart, what was the total square feet for leased facilities?
| 373000.0 |
CONVFINQA5226 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations executive summary international paper 2019s operating results in 2006 bene- fited from strong gains in pricing and sales volumes and lower operating costs . our average paper and packaging prices in 2006 increased faster than our costs for the first time in four years . the improve- ment in sales volumes reflects increased uncoated papers , corrugated box , coated paperboard and european papers shipments , as well as improved revenues from our xpedx distribution business . our manufacturing operations also made solid cost reduction improvements . lower interest expense , reflecting debt repayments in 2005 and 2006 , was also a positive factor . together , these improvements more than offset the effects of continued high raw material and distribution costs , lower real estate sales , higher net corporate expenses and lower con- tributions from businesses and forestlands divested during 2006 . looking forward to 2007 , we expect seasonally higher sales volumes in the first quarter . average paper price realizations should continue to improve as we implement previously announced price increases in europe and brazil . input costs for energy , fiber and chemicals are expected to be mixed , although slightly higher in the first quarter . operating results will benefit from the recently completed international paper/sun paperboard joint ventures in china and the addition of the luiz anto- nio paper mill to our operations in brazil . however , primarily as a result of lower real estate sales in the first quarter , we anticipate earnings from continuing operations will be somewhat lower than in the 2006 fourth quarter . significant steps were also taken in 2006 in the execution of the company 2019s transformation plan . we completed the sales of our u.s . and brazilian coated papers businesses and 5.6 million acres of u.s . forestlands , and announced definitive sale agreements for our kraft papers , beverage pack- aging and arizona chemical businesses and a majority of our wood products business , all expected to close during 2007 . through december 31 , 2006 , we have received approximately $ 9.7 billion of the estimated proceeds from divest- itures announced under this plan of approximately $ 11.3 billion , with the balance to be received as the remaining divestitures are completed in the first half of 2007 . we have strengthened our balance sheet by reducing debt by $ 6.2 billion , and returned value to our shareholders by repurchasing 39.7 million shares of our common stock for approximately $ 1.4 billion . we made a $ 1.0 billion voluntary contribution to our u.s . qualified pension fund . we have identified selective reinvestment opportunities totaling approx- imately $ 2.0 billion , including opportunities in china , brazil and russia . finally , we remain focused on our three-year $ 1.2 billion target for non-price profit- ability improvements , with $ 330 million realized during 2006 . while more remains to be done in 2007 , we have made substantial progress toward achiev- ing the objectives announced at the outset of the plan in july 2005 . results of operations industry segment operating profits are used by inter- national paper 2019s management to measure the earn- ings performance of its businesses . management believes that this measure allows a better under- standing of trends in costs , operating efficiencies , prices and volumes . industry segment operating profits are defined as earnings before taxes and minority interest , interest expense , corporate items and corporate special items . industry segment oper- ating profits are defined by the securities and exchange commission as a non-gaap financial measure , and are not gaap alternatives to net income or any other operating measure prescribed by accounting principles generally accepted in the united states . international paper operates in six segments : print- ing papers , industrial packaging , consumer pack- aging , distribution , forest products and specialty businesses and other . the following table shows the components of net earnings ( loss ) for each of the last three years : in millions 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>industry segment operating profits</td><td>$ 2074</td><td>$ 1622</td><td>$ 1703</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>corporate items net</td><td>-746 ( 746 )</td><td>-607 ( 607 )</td><td>-477 ( 477 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate special items*</td><td>2373</td><td>-134 ( 134 )</td><td>-141 ( 141 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest expense net</td><td>-521 ( 521 )</td><td>-595 ( 595 )</td><td>-712 ( 712 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>minority interest</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>income tax ( provision ) benefit</td><td>-1889 ( 1889 )</td><td>407</td><td>-114 ( 114 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>discontinued operations</td><td>-232 ( 232 )</td><td>416</td><td>-273 ( 273 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>$ 1050</td><td>$ 1100</td><td>$ -35 ( 35 )</td></tr></table> * corporate special items include gains on transformation plan forestland sales , goodwill impairment charges , restructuring and other charges , net losses on sales and impairments of businesses , insurance recoveries and reversals of reserves no longer required. .
Question: what was the change in industry segment operating profits from 2004 to 2005?
| -81.0 |
CONVFINQA5227 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations executive summary international paper 2019s operating results in 2006 bene- fited from strong gains in pricing and sales volumes and lower operating costs . our average paper and packaging prices in 2006 increased faster than our costs for the first time in four years . the improve- ment in sales volumes reflects increased uncoated papers , corrugated box , coated paperboard and european papers shipments , as well as improved revenues from our xpedx distribution business . our manufacturing operations also made solid cost reduction improvements . lower interest expense , reflecting debt repayments in 2005 and 2006 , was also a positive factor . together , these improvements more than offset the effects of continued high raw material and distribution costs , lower real estate sales , higher net corporate expenses and lower con- tributions from businesses and forestlands divested during 2006 . looking forward to 2007 , we expect seasonally higher sales volumes in the first quarter . average paper price realizations should continue to improve as we implement previously announced price increases in europe and brazil . input costs for energy , fiber and chemicals are expected to be mixed , although slightly higher in the first quarter . operating results will benefit from the recently completed international paper/sun paperboard joint ventures in china and the addition of the luiz anto- nio paper mill to our operations in brazil . however , primarily as a result of lower real estate sales in the first quarter , we anticipate earnings from continuing operations will be somewhat lower than in the 2006 fourth quarter . significant steps were also taken in 2006 in the execution of the company 2019s transformation plan . we completed the sales of our u.s . and brazilian coated papers businesses and 5.6 million acres of u.s . forestlands , and announced definitive sale agreements for our kraft papers , beverage pack- aging and arizona chemical businesses and a majority of our wood products business , all expected to close during 2007 . through december 31 , 2006 , we have received approximately $ 9.7 billion of the estimated proceeds from divest- itures announced under this plan of approximately $ 11.3 billion , with the balance to be received as the remaining divestitures are completed in the first half of 2007 . we have strengthened our balance sheet by reducing debt by $ 6.2 billion , and returned value to our shareholders by repurchasing 39.7 million shares of our common stock for approximately $ 1.4 billion . we made a $ 1.0 billion voluntary contribution to our u.s . qualified pension fund . we have identified selective reinvestment opportunities totaling approx- imately $ 2.0 billion , including opportunities in china , brazil and russia . finally , we remain focused on our three-year $ 1.2 billion target for non-price profit- ability improvements , with $ 330 million realized during 2006 . while more remains to be done in 2007 , we have made substantial progress toward achiev- ing the objectives announced at the outset of the plan in july 2005 . results of operations industry segment operating profits are used by inter- national paper 2019s management to measure the earn- ings performance of its businesses . management believes that this measure allows a better under- standing of trends in costs , operating efficiencies , prices and volumes . industry segment operating profits are defined as earnings before taxes and minority interest , interest expense , corporate items and corporate special items . industry segment oper- ating profits are defined by the securities and exchange commission as a non-gaap financial measure , and are not gaap alternatives to net income or any other operating measure prescribed by accounting principles generally accepted in the united states . international paper operates in six segments : print- ing papers , industrial packaging , consumer pack- aging , distribution , forest products and specialty businesses and other . the following table shows the components of net earnings ( loss ) for each of the last three years : in millions 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>industry segment operating profits</td><td>$ 2074</td><td>$ 1622</td><td>$ 1703</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>corporate items net</td><td>-746 ( 746 )</td><td>-607 ( 607 )</td><td>-477 ( 477 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate special items*</td><td>2373</td><td>-134 ( 134 )</td><td>-141 ( 141 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest expense net</td><td>-521 ( 521 )</td><td>-595 ( 595 )</td><td>-712 ( 712 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>minority interest</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>income tax ( provision ) benefit</td><td>-1889 ( 1889 )</td><td>407</td><td>-114 ( 114 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>discontinued operations</td><td>-232 ( 232 )</td><td>416</td><td>-273 ( 273 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>$ 1050</td><td>$ 1100</td><td>$ -35 ( 35 )</td></tr></table> * corporate special items include gains on transformation plan forestland sales , goodwill impairment charges , restructuring and other charges , net losses on sales and impairments of businesses , insurance recoveries and reversals of reserves no longer required. .
Question: what was the change in industry segment operating profits from 2004 to 2005?
Answer: -81.0
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to those profits in 2004, in percentage?
| -0.04756 |
CONVFINQA5228 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations executive summary international paper 2019s operating results in 2006 bene- fited from strong gains in pricing and sales volumes and lower operating costs . our average paper and packaging prices in 2006 increased faster than our costs for the first time in four years . the improve- ment in sales volumes reflects increased uncoated papers , corrugated box , coated paperboard and european papers shipments , as well as improved revenues from our xpedx distribution business . our manufacturing operations also made solid cost reduction improvements . lower interest expense , reflecting debt repayments in 2005 and 2006 , was also a positive factor . together , these improvements more than offset the effects of continued high raw material and distribution costs , lower real estate sales , higher net corporate expenses and lower con- tributions from businesses and forestlands divested during 2006 . looking forward to 2007 , we expect seasonally higher sales volumes in the first quarter . average paper price realizations should continue to improve as we implement previously announced price increases in europe and brazil . input costs for energy , fiber and chemicals are expected to be mixed , although slightly higher in the first quarter . operating results will benefit from the recently completed international paper/sun paperboard joint ventures in china and the addition of the luiz anto- nio paper mill to our operations in brazil . however , primarily as a result of lower real estate sales in the first quarter , we anticipate earnings from continuing operations will be somewhat lower than in the 2006 fourth quarter . significant steps were also taken in 2006 in the execution of the company 2019s transformation plan . we completed the sales of our u.s . and brazilian coated papers businesses and 5.6 million acres of u.s . forestlands , and announced definitive sale agreements for our kraft papers , beverage pack- aging and arizona chemical businesses and a majority of our wood products business , all expected to close during 2007 . through december 31 , 2006 , we have received approximately $ 9.7 billion of the estimated proceeds from divest- itures announced under this plan of approximately $ 11.3 billion , with the balance to be received as the remaining divestitures are completed in the first half of 2007 . we have strengthened our balance sheet by reducing debt by $ 6.2 billion , and returned value to our shareholders by repurchasing 39.7 million shares of our common stock for approximately $ 1.4 billion . we made a $ 1.0 billion voluntary contribution to our u.s . qualified pension fund . we have identified selective reinvestment opportunities totaling approx- imately $ 2.0 billion , including opportunities in china , brazil and russia . finally , we remain focused on our three-year $ 1.2 billion target for non-price profit- ability improvements , with $ 330 million realized during 2006 . while more remains to be done in 2007 , we have made substantial progress toward achiev- ing the objectives announced at the outset of the plan in july 2005 . results of operations industry segment operating profits are used by inter- national paper 2019s management to measure the earn- ings performance of its businesses . management believes that this measure allows a better under- standing of trends in costs , operating efficiencies , prices and volumes . industry segment operating profits are defined as earnings before taxes and minority interest , interest expense , corporate items and corporate special items . industry segment oper- ating profits are defined by the securities and exchange commission as a non-gaap financial measure , and are not gaap alternatives to net income or any other operating measure prescribed by accounting principles generally accepted in the united states . international paper operates in six segments : print- ing papers , industrial packaging , consumer pack- aging , distribution , forest products and specialty businesses and other . the following table shows the components of net earnings ( loss ) for each of the last three years : in millions 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>industry segment operating profits</td><td>$ 2074</td><td>$ 1622</td><td>$ 1703</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>corporate items net</td><td>-746 ( 746 )</td><td>-607 ( 607 )</td><td>-477 ( 477 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate special items*</td><td>2373</td><td>-134 ( 134 )</td><td>-141 ( 141 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest expense net</td><td>-521 ( 521 )</td><td>-595 ( 595 )</td><td>-712 ( 712 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>minority interest</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>income tax ( provision ) benefit</td><td>-1889 ( 1889 )</td><td>407</td><td>-114 ( 114 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>discontinued operations</td><td>-232 ( 232 )</td><td>416</td><td>-273 ( 273 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>$ 1050</td><td>$ 1100</td><td>$ -35 ( 35 )</td></tr></table> * corporate special items include gains on transformation plan forestland sales , goodwill impairment charges , restructuring and other charges , net losses on sales and impairments of businesses , insurance recoveries and reversals of reserves no longer required. .
Question: what was the change in industry segment operating profits from 2004 to 2005?
Answer: -81.0
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to those profits in 2004, in percentage?
Answer: -0.04756
Question: and over the subsequent year, what was that change in the operating profits?
| 452.0 |
CONVFINQA5229 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations executive summary international paper 2019s operating results in 2006 bene- fited from strong gains in pricing and sales volumes and lower operating costs . our average paper and packaging prices in 2006 increased faster than our costs for the first time in four years . the improve- ment in sales volumes reflects increased uncoated papers , corrugated box , coated paperboard and european papers shipments , as well as improved revenues from our xpedx distribution business . our manufacturing operations also made solid cost reduction improvements . lower interest expense , reflecting debt repayments in 2005 and 2006 , was also a positive factor . together , these improvements more than offset the effects of continued high raw material and distribution costs , lower real estate sales , higher net corporate expenses and lower con- tributions from businesses and forestlands divested during 2006 . looking forward to 2007 , we expect seasonally higher sales volumes in the first quarter . average paper price realizations should continue to improve as we implement previously announced price increases in europe and brazil . input costs for energy , fiber and chemicals are expected to be mixed , although slightly higher in the first quarter . operating results will benefit from the recently completed international paper/sun paperboard joint ventures in china and the addition of the luiz anto- nio paper mill to our operations in brazil . however , primarily as a result of lower real estate sales in the first quarter , we anticipate earnings from continuing operations will be somewhat lower than in the 2006 fourth quarter . significant steps were also taken in 2006 in the execution of the company 2019s transformation plan . we completed the sales of our u.s . and brazilian coated papers businesses and 5.6 million acres of u.s . forestlands , and announced definitive sale agreements for our kraft papers , beverage pack- aging and arizona chemical businesses and a majority of our wood products business , all expected to close during 2007 . through december 31 , 2006 , we have received approximately $ 9.7 billion of the estimated proceeds from divest- itures announced under this plan of approximately $ 11.3 billion , with the balance to be received as the remaining divestitures are completed in the first half of 2007 . we have strengthened our balance sheet by reducing debt by $ 6.2 billion , and returned value to our shareholders by repurchasing 39.7 million shares of our common stock for approximately $ 1.4 billion . we made a $ 1.0 billion voluntary contribution to our u.s . qualified pension fund . we have identified selective reinvestment opportunities totaling approx- imately $ 2.0 billion , including opportunities in china , brazil and russia . finally , we remain focused on our three-year $ 1.2 billion target for non-price profit- ability improvements , with $ 330 million realized during 2006 . while more remains to be done in 2007 , we have made substantial progress toward achiev- ing the objectives announced at the outset of the plan in july 2005 . results of operations industry segment operating profits are used by inter- national paper 2019s management to measure the earn- ings performance of its businesses . management believes that this measure allows a better under- standing of trends in costs , operating efficiencies , prices and volumes . industry segment operating profits are defined as earnings before taxes and minority interest , interest expense , corporate items and corporate special items . industry segment oper- ating profits are defined by the securities and exchange commission as a non-gaap financial measure , and are not gaap alternatives to net income or any other operating measure prescribed by accounting principles generally accepted in the united states . international paper operates in six segments : print- ing papers , industrial packaging , consumer pack- aging , distribution , forest products and specialty businesses and other . the following table shows the components of net earnings ( loss ) for each of the last three years : in millions 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>industry segment operating profits</td><td>$ 2074</td><td>$ 1622</td><td>$ 1703</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>corporate items net</td><td>-746 ( 746 )</td><td>-607 ( 607 )</td><td>-477 ( 477 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate special items*</td><td>2373</td><td>-134 ( 134 )</td><td>-141 ( 141 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest expense net</td><td>-521 ( 521 )</td><td>-595 ( 595 )</td><td>-712 ( 712 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>minority interest</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>income tax ( provision ) benefit</td><td>-1889 ( 1889 )</td><td>407</td><td>-114 ( 114 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>discontinued operations</td><td>-232 ( 232 )</td><td>416</td><td>-273 ( 273 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>$ 1050</td><td>$ 1100</td><td>$ -35 ( 35 )</td></tr></table> * corporate special items include gains on transformation plan forestland sales , goodwill impairment charges , restructuring and other charges , net losses on sales and impairments of businesses , insurance recoveries and reversals of reserves no longer required. .
Question: what was the change in industry segment operating profits from 2004 to 2005?
Answer: -81.0
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to those profits in 2004, in percentage?
Answer: -0.04756
Question: and over the subsequent year, what was that change in the operating profits?
Answer: 452.0
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of the 2005 operating profits?
| 0.27867 |
CONVFINQA5230 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity and capital resources we maintained a strong financial position throughout 2018 and as of 30 september 2018 our consolidated balance sheet included cash and cash items of $ 2791.3 . we continue to have consistent access to commercial paper markets , and cash flows from operating and financing activities are expected to meet liquidity needs for the foreseeable future . as of 30 september 2018 , we had $ 995.1 of foreign cash and cash items compared to a total amount of cash and cash items of $ 2791.3 . as a result of the tax act , we currently do not expect that a significant portion of the earnings of our foreign subsidiaries and affiliates will be subject to u.s . income tax upon subsequent repatriation to the united states . depending on the country in which the subsidiaries and affiliates reside , the repatriation of these earnings may be subject to foreign withholding and other taxes . however , since we have significant current investment plans outside the u.s. , it is our intent to permanently reinvest the majority of our foreign cash and cash items that would be subject to additional taxes outside the u.s . refer to note 22 , income taxes , for additional information . our cash flows from operating , investing , and financing activities from continuing operations , as reflected in the consolidated statements of cash flows , are summarized in the following table: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash provided by ( used for )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating activities</td><td>$ 2554.7</td><td>$ 2534.1</td><td>$ 2258.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investing activities</td><td>-1649.1 ( 1649.1 )</td><td>-1417.7 ( 1417.7 )</td><td>-864.8 ( 864.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>financing activities</td><td>-1359.8 ( 1359.8 )</td><td>-2040.9 ( 2040.9 )</td><td>-860.2 ( 860.2 )</td></tr></table> operating activities for the year ended 2018 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 2554.7 . income from continuing operations of $ 1455.6 was adjusted for items including depreciation and amortization , deferred income taxes , impacts from the tax act , undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates , share-based compensation , and noncurrent capital lease receivables . other adjustments of $ 131.6 include a $ 54.9 net impact from the remeasurement of intercompany transactions . the related hedging instruments that eliminate the earnings impact are included as a working capital adjustment in other receivables or payables and accrued liabilities . in addition , other adjustments were impacted by cash received from the early termination of a cross currency swap of $ 54.4 , as well as the excess of pension expense over pension contributions of $ 23.5 . the working capital accounts were a use of cash of $ 265.4 , primarily driven by payables and accrued liabilities , inventories , and trade receivables , partially offset by other receivables . the use of cash in payables and accrued liabilities of $ 277.7 includes a decrease in customer advances of $ 145.7 primarily related to sale of equipment activity and $ 67.1 for maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures . the use of cash in inventories primarily resulted from the purchase of helium molecules . in addition , inventories reflect the noncash impact of our change in accounting for u.s . inventories from lifo to fifo . the source of cash from other receivables of $ 123.6 was primarily due to the maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures for the year ended 2017 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 2534.1 . income from continuing operations of $ 1134.4 included a goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge of $ 162.1 , an equity method investment impairment charge of $ 79.5 , and a write-down of long-lived assets associated with restructuring of $ 69.2 . refer to note 5 , cost reduction and asset actions ; note 8 , summarized financial information of equity affiliates ; note 10 , goodwill ; and note 11 , intangible assets , of the consolidated financial statements for additional information on these charges . other adjustments of $ 165.4 included changes in uncertain tax positions and the fair value of foreign exchange contracts that hedge intercompany loans as well as pension contributions and expense . the working capital accounts were a source of cash of $ 48.0 that were primarily driven by payables and accrued liabilities and other receivables , partially offset by other working capital and trade receivables . the increase in payables and accrued liabilities of $ 163.8 was primarily due to timing differences related to payables and accrued liabilities and an increase in customer advances of $ 52.8 primarily related to sale of equipment activity . the source of cash from other receivables of $ 124.7 was primarily due to the maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures . other working capital was a use of cash of $ 154.0 , primarily driven by payments for income taxes . trade receivables was a use of cash of $ 73.6 which is primarily due to timing differences. .
Question: what was the difference in cash provided by operating activities and the cash used for investing activities in 2018?
| 905.6 |
CONVFINQA5231 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity and capital resources we maintained a strong financial position throughout 2018 and as of 30 september 2018 our consolidated balance sheet included cash and cash items of $ 2791.3 . we continue to have consistent access to commercial paper markets , and cash flows from operating and financing activities are expected to meet liquidity needs for the foreseeable future . as of 30 september 2018 , we had $ 995.1 of foreign cash and cash items compared to a total amount of cash and cash items of $ 2791.3 . as a result of the tax act , we currently do not expect that a significant portion of the earnings of our foreign subsidiaries and affiliates will be subject to u.s . income tax upon subsequent repatriation to the united states . depending on the country in which the subsidiaries and affiliates reside , the repatriation of these earnings may be subject to foreign withholding and other taxes . however , since we have significant current investment plans outside the u.s. , it is our intent to permanently reinvest the majority of our foreign cash and cash items that would be subject to additional taxes outside the u.s . refer to note 22 , income taxes , for additional information . our cash flows from operating , investing , and financing activities from continuing operations , as reflected in the consolidated statements of cash flows , are summarized in the following table: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash provided by ( used for )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating activities</td><td>$ 2554.7</td><td>$ 2534.1</td><td>$ 2258.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investing activities</td><td>-1649.1 ( 1649.1 )</td><td>-1417.7 ( 1417.7 )</td><td>-864.8 ( 864.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>financing activities</td><td>-1359.8 ( 1359.8 )</td><td>-2040.9 ( 2040.9 )</td><td>-860.2 ( 860.2 )</td></tr></table> operating activities for the year ended 2018 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 2554.7 . income from continuing operations of $ 1455.6 was adjusted for items including depreciation and amortization , deferred income taxes , impacts from the tax act , undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates , share-based compensation , and noncurrent capital lease receivables . other adjustments of $ 131.6 include a $ 54.9 net impact from the remeasurement of intercompany transactions . the related hedging instruments that eliminate the earnings impact are included as a working capital adjustment in other receivables or payables and accrued liabilities . in addition , other adjustments were impacted by cash received from the early termination of a cross currency swap of $ 54.4 , as well as the excess of pension expense over pension contributions of $ 23.5 . the working capital accounts were a use of cash of $ 265.4 , primarily driven by payables and accrued liabilities , inventories , and trade receivables , partially offset by other receivables . the use of cash in payables and accrued liabilities of $ 277.7 includes a decrease in customer advances of $ 145.7 primarily related to sale of equipment activity and $ 67.1 for maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures . the use of cash in inventories primarily resulted from the purchase of helium molecules . in addition , inventories reflect the noncash impact of our change in accounting for u.s . inventories from lifo to fifo . the source of cash from other receivables of $ 123.6 was primarily due to the maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures for the year ended 2017 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 2534.1 . income from continuing operations of $ 1134.4 included a goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge of $ 162.1 , an equity method investment impairment charge of $ 79.5 , and a write-down of long-lived assets associated with restructuring of $ 69.2 . refer to note 5 , cost reduction and asset actions ; note 8 , summarized financial information of equity affiliates ; note 10 , goodwill ; and note 11 , intangible assets , of the consolidated financial statements for additional information on these charges . other adjustments of $ 165.4 included changes in uncertain tax positions and the fair value of foreign exchange contracts that hedge intercompany loans as well as pension contributions and expense . the working capital accounts were a source of cash of $ 48.0 that were primarily driven by payables and accrued liabilities and other receivables , partially offset by other working capital and trade receivables . the increase in payables and accrued liabilities of $ 163.8 was primarily due to timing differences related to payables and accrued liabilities and an increase in customer advances of $ 52.8 primarily related to sale of equipment activity . the source of cash from other receivables of $ 124.7 was primarily due to the maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures . other working capital was a use of cash of $ 154.0 , primarily driven by payments for income taxes . trade receivables was a use of cash of $ 73.6 which is primarily due to timing differences. .
Question: what was the difference in cash provided by operating activities and the cash used for investing activities in 2018?
Answer: 905.6
Question: and the cash used for financing activities during that time?
| 1359.8 |
CONVFINQA5232 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity and capital resources we maintained a strong financial position throughout 2018 and as of 30 september 2018 our consolidated balance sheet included cash and cash items of $ 2791.3 . we continue to have consistent access to commercial paper markets , and cash flows from operating and financing activities are expected to meet liquidity needs for the foreseeable future . as of 30 september 2018 , we had $ 995.1 of foreign cash and cash items compared to a total amount of cash and cash items of $ 2791.3 . as a result of the tax act , we currently do not expect that a significant portion of the earnings of our foreign subsidiaries and affiliates will be subject to u.s . income tax upon subsequent repatriation to the united states . depending on the country in which the subsidiaries and affiliates reside , the repatriation of these earnings may be subject to foreign withholding and other taxes . however , since we have significant current investment plans outside the u.s. , it is our intent to permanently reinvest the majority of our foreign cash and cash items that would be subject to additional taxes outside the u.s . refer to note 22 , income taxes , for additional information . our cash flows from operating , investing , and financing activities from continuing operations , as reflected in the consolidated statements of cash flows , are summarized in the following table: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash provided by ( used for )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating activities</td><td>$ 2554.7</td><td>$ 2534.1</td><td>$ 2258.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investing activities</td><td>-1649.1 ( 1649.1 )</td><td>-1417.7 ( 1417.7 )</td><td>-864.8 ( 864.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>financing activities</td><td>-1359.8 ( 1359.8 )</td><td>-2040.9 ( 2040.9 )</td><td>-860.2 ( 860.2 )</td></tr></table> operating activities for the year ended 2018 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 2554.7 . income from continuing operations of $ 1455.6 was adjusted for items including depreciation and amortization , deferred income taxes , impacts from the tax act , undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates , share-based compensation , and noncurrent capital lease receivables . other adjustments of $ 131.6 include a $ 54.9 net impact from the remeasurement of intercompany transactions . the related hedging instruments that eliminate the earnings impact are included as a working capital adjustment in other receivables or payables and accrued liabilities . in addition , other adjustments were impacted by cash received from the early termination of a cross currency swap of $ 54.4 , as well as the excess of pension expense over pension contributions of $ 23.5 . the working capital accounts were a use of cash of $ 265.4 , primarily driven by payables and accrued liabilities , inventories , and trade receivables , partially offset by other receivables . the use of cash in payables and accrued liabilities of $ 277.7 includes a decrease in customer advances of $ 145.7 primarily related to sale of equipment activity and $ 67.1 for maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures . the use of cash in inventories primarily resulted from the purchase of helium molecules . in addition , inventories reflect the noncash impact of our change in accounting for u.s . inventories from lifo to fifo . the source of cash from other receivables of $ 123.6 was primarily due to the maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures for the year ended 2017 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 2534.1 . income from continuing operations of $ 1134.4 included a goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge of $ 162.1 , an equity method investment impairment charge of $ 79.5 , and a write-down of long-lived assets associated with restructuring of $ 69.2 . refer to note 5 , cost reduction and asset actions ; note 8 , summarized financial information of equity affiliates ; note 10 , goodwill ; and note 11 , intangible assets , of the consolidated financial statements for additional information on these charges . other adjustments of $ 165.4 included changes in uncertain tax positions and the fair value of foreign exchange contracts that hedge intercompany loans as well as pension contributions and expense . the working capital accounts were a source of cash of $ 48.0 that were primarily driven by payables and accrued liabilities and other receivables , partially offset by other working capital and trade receivables . the increase in payables and accrued liabilities of $ 163.8 was primarily due to timing differences related to payables and accrued liabilities and an increase in customer advances of $ 52.8 primarily related to sale of equipment activity . the source of cash from other receivables of $ 124.7 was primarily due to the maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures . other working capital was a use of cash of $ 154.0 , primarily driven by payments for income taxes . trade receivables was a use of cash of $ 73.6 which is primarily due to timing differences. .
Question: what was the difference in cash provided by operating activities and the cash used for investing activities in 2018?
Answer: 905.6
Question: and the cash used for financing activities during that time?
Answer: 1359.8
Question: and the net cash from operations?
| -454.2 |
CONVFINQA5233 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2012 , 2011 and 2010 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 10580</td><td>$ 7632</td><td>$ 10640</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustments</td><td>-2225 ( 2225 )</td><td>5156</td><td>-4144 ( 4144 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income tax effect relating to translation adjustments forundistributed foreign earnings</td><td>1314</td><td>-2208 ( 2208 )</td><td>1136</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 9669</td><td>$ 10580</td><td>$ 7632</td></tr></table> stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties . authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration . however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time . during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority . as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 . during the second quarter of fiscal 2012 , we exhausted our $ 1.6 billion authority granted by our board of directors in fiscal in april 2012 , the board of directors approved a new stock repurchase program granting authority to repurchase up to $ 2.0 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2015 . the new stock repurchase program approved by our board of directors is similar to our previous $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program . during fiscal 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 405.0 million , $ 695.0 million and $ 850 million , respectively . of the $ 405.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2012 , $ 100.0 million was under the new $ 2.0 billion stock repurchase program and the remaining $ 305.0 million was under our previous $ 1.6 billion authority . of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar-based authority . we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time . we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions . there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases . under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us . the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term . the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount . during fiscal 2012 , we repurchased approximately 11.5 million shares at an average price of $ 32.29 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2012 . during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 . during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 . for fiscal 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by november 30 , 2012 , december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share . as of november 30 , 2012 , $ 33.0 million of prepayments remained under these agreements . as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .
Question: what was the change in the average price of repurchased shares from 2011 to 2012?
| 0.48 |
CONVFINQA5234 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2012 , 2011 and 2010 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 10580</td><td>$ 7632</td><td>$ 10640</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustments</td><td>-2225 ( 2225 )</td><td>5156</td><td>-4144 ( 4144 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income tax effect relating to translation adjustments forundistributed foreign earnings</td><td>1314</td><td>-2208 ( 2208 )</td><td>1136</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 9669</td><td>$ 10580</td><td>$ 7632</td></tr></table> stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties . authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration . however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time . during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority . as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 . during the second quarter of fiscal 2012 , we exhausted our $ 1.6 billion authority granted by our board of directors in fiscal in april 2012 , the board of directors approved a new stock repurchase program granting authority to repurchase up to $ 2.0 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2015 . the new stock repurchase program approved by our board of directors is similar to our previous $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program . during fiscal 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 405.0 million , $ 695.0 million and $ 850 million , respectively . of the $ 405.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2012 , $ 100.0 million was under the new $ 2.0 billion stock repurchase program and the remaining $ 305.0 million was under our previous $ 1.6 billion authority . of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar-based authority . we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time . we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions . there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases . under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us . the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term . the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount . during fiscal 2012 , we repurchased approximately 11.5 million shares at an average price of $ 32.29 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2012 . during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 . during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 . for fiscal 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by november 30 , 2012 , december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share . as of november 30 , 2012 , $ 33.0 million of prepayments remained under these agreements . as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .
Question: what was the change in the average price of repurchased shares from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 0.48
Question: and what was that average price in 2011?
| 31.81 |
CONVFINQA5235 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2012 , 2011 and 2010 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 10580</td><td>$ 7632</td><td>$ 10640</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustments</td><td>-2225 ( 2225 )</td><td>5156</td><td>-4144 ( 4144 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income tax effect relating to translation adjustments forundistributed foreign earnings</td><td>1314</td><td>-2208 ( 2208 )</td><td>1136</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 9669</td><td>$ 10580</td><td>$ 7632</td></tr></table> stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties . authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration . however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time . during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority . as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 . during the second quarter of fiscal 2012 , we exhausted our $ 1.6 billion authority granted by our board of directors in fiscal in april 2012 , the board of directors approved a new stock repurchase program granting authority to repurchase up to $ 2.0 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2015 . the new stock repurchase program approved by our board of directors is similar to our previous $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program . during fiscal 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 405.0 million , $ 695.0 million and $ 850 million , respectively . of the $ 405.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2012 , $ 100.0 million was under the new $ 2.0 billion stock repurchase program and the remaining $ 305.0 million was under our previous $ 1.6 billion authority . of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar-based authority . we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time . we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions . there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases . under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us . the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term . the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount . during fiscal 2012 , we repurchased approximately 11.5 million shares at an average price of $ 32.29 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2012 . during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 . during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 . for fiscal 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by november 30 , 2012 , december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share . as of november 30 , 2012 , $ 33.0 million of prepayments remained under these agreements . as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .
Question: what was the change in the average price of repurchased shares from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 0.48
Question: and what was that average price in 2011?
Answer: 31.81
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2011 average price?
| 0.01509 |
CONVFINQA5236 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td><td>12/31/2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 146.54</td><td>$ 159.23</td><td>$ 148.89</td><td>$ 182.70</td><td>$ 195.75</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 132.38</td><td>$ 150.49</td><td>$ 152.55</td><td>$ 170.79</td><td>$ 208.06</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 141.38</td><td>$ 176.83</td><td>$ 147.19</td><td>$ 179.37</td><td>$ 213.49</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in the value of the class b common stock, considering its value in 2017 and the original amount invested in it in 2012?
| 95.75 |
CONVFINQA5237 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td><td>12/31/2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 146.54</td><td>$ 159.23</td><td>$ 148.89</td><td>$ 182.70</td><td>$ 195.75</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 132.38</td><td>$ 150.49</td><td>$ 152.55</td><td>$ 170.79</td><td>$ 208.06</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 141.38</td><td>$ 176.83</td><td>$ 147.19</td><td>$ 179.37</td><td>$ 213.49</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in the value of the class b common stock, considering its value in 2017 and the original amount invested in it in 2012?
Answer: 95.75
Question: and what was this original amount?
| 100.0 |
CONVFINQA5238 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td><td>12/31/2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 146.54</td><td>$ 159.23</td><td>$ 148.89</td><td>$ 182.70</td><td>$ 195.75</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 132.38</td><td>$ 150.49</td><td>$ 152.55</td><td>$ 170.79</td><td>$ 208.06</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 141.38</td><td>$ 176.83</td><td>$ 147.19</td><td>$ 179.37</td><td>$ 213.49</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in the value of the class b common stock, considering its value in 2017 and the original amount invested in it in 2012?
Answer: 95.75
Question: and what was this original amount?
Answer: 100.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this original amount invested in 2012, in percentage?
| 0.9575 |
CONVFINQA5239 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
5 . stock based compensation overview maa accounts for its stock based employee compensation plans in accordance with accounting standards governing stock based compensation . these standards require an entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based on the award's fair value on the grant date and recognize the cost over the period during which the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award , which is generally the vesting period . any liability awards issued are remeasured at each reporting period . maa 2019s stock compensation plans consist of a number of incentives provided to attract and retain independent directors , executive officers and key employees . incentives are currently granted under the second amended and restated 2013 stock incentive plan , or the stock plan , which was approved at the 2018 annual meeting of maa shareholders . the stock plan allows for the grant of restricted stock and stock options up to 2000000 shares . maa believes that such awards better align the interests of its employees with those of its shareholders . compensation expense is generally recognized for service based restricted stock awards using the straight-line method over the vesting period of the shares regardless of cliff or ratable vesting distinctions . compensation expense for market and performance based restricted stock awards is generally recognized using the accelerated amortization method with each vesting tranche valued as a separate award , with a separate vesting date , consistent with the estimated value of the award at each period end . additionally , compensation expense is adjusted for actual forfeitures for all awards in the period that the award was forfeited . compensation expense for stock options is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period . maa presents stock compensation expense in the consolidated statements of operations in "general and administrative expenses" . total compensation expense under the stock plan was $ 12.9 million , $ 10.8 million and $ 12.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . of these amounts , total compensation expense capitalized was $ 0.5 million , $ 0.2 million and $ 0.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total unrecognized compensation expense was $ 13.5 million . this cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted average period of 1.1 years . total cash paid for the settlement of plan shares totaled $ 2.9 million , $ 4.8 million and $ 2.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . information concerning grants under the stock plan is provided below . restricted stock in general , restricted stock is earned based on either a service condition , performance condition , or market condition , or a combination thereof , and generally vests ratably over a period from 1 year to 5 years . service based awards are earned when the employee remains employed over the requisite service period and are valued on the grant date based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant . market based awards are earned when maa reaches a specified stock price or specified return on the stock price ( price appreciation plus dividends ) and are valued on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation . performance based awards are earned when maa reaches certain operational goals such as funds from operations , or ffo , targets and are valued based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant as well as the probability of reaching the stated targets . maa remeasures the fair value of the performance based awards each balance sheet date with adjustments made on a cumulative basis until the award is settled and the final compensation is known . the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , was $ 71.85 , $ 84.53 and $ 73.20 , respectively . the following is a summary of the key assumptions used in the valuation calculations for market based awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk free rate</td><td>1.61% ( 1.61 % ) - 2.14% ( 2.14 % )</td><td>0.65% ( 0.65 % ) - 1.57% ( 1.57 % )</td><td>0.49% ( 0.49 % ) - 1.27% ( 1.27 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>3.884% ( 3.884 % )</td><td>3.573% ( 3.573 % )</td><td>3.634% ( 3.634 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>15.05% ( 15.05 % ) - 17.18% ( 17.18 % )</td><td>20.43% ( 20.43 % ) - 21.85% ( 21.85 % )</td><td>18.41% ( 18.41 % ) - 19.45% ( 19.45 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>requisite service period</td><td>3 years</td><td>3 years</td><td>3 years</td></tr></table> the risk free rate was based on a zero coupon risk-free rate . the minimum risk free rate was based on a period of 0.25 years for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 . the maximum risk free rate was based on a period of 3 years for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 . the dividend yield was based on the closing stock price of maa stock on the .
Question: what is the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock in 2017?
| 84.53 |
CONVFINQA5240 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
5 . stock based compensation overview maa accounts for its stock based employee compensation plans in accordance with accounting standards governing stock based compensation . these standards require an entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based on the award's fair value on the grant date and recognize the cost over the period during which the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award , which is generally the vesting period . any liability awards issued are remeasured at each reporting period . maa 2019s stock compensation plans consist of a number of incentives provided to attract and retain independent directors , executive officers and key employees . incentives are currently granted under the second amended and restated 2013 stock incentive plan , or the stock plan , which was approved at the 2018 annual meeting of maa shareholders . the stock plan allows for the grant of restricted stock and stock options up to 2000000 shares . maa believes that such awards better align the interests of its employees with those of its shareholders . compensation expense is generally recognized for service based restricted stock awards using the straight-line method over the vesting period of the shares regardless of cliff or ratable vesting distinctions . compensation expense for market and performance based restricted stock awards is generally recognized using the accelerated amortization method with each vesting tranche valued as a separate award , with a separate vesting date , consistent with the estimated value of the award at each period end . additionally , compensation expense is adjusted for actual forfeitures for all awards in the period that the award was forfeited . compensation expense for stock options is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period . maa presents stock compensation expense in the consolidated statements of operations in "general and administrative expenses" . total compensation expense under the stock plan was $ 12.9 million , $ 10.8 million and $ 12.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . of these amounts , total compensation expense capitalized was $ 0.5 million , $ 0.2 million and $ 0.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total unrecognized compensation expense was $ 13.5 million . this cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted average period of 1.1 years . total cash paid for the settlement of plan shares totaled $ 2.9 million , $ 4.8 million and $ 2.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . information concerning grants under the stock plan is provided below . restricted stock in general , restricted stock is earned based on either a service condition , performance condition , or market condition , or a combination thereof , and generally vests ratably over a period from 1 year to 5 years . service based awards are earned when the employee remains employed over the requisite service period and are valued on the grant date based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant . market based awards are earned when maa reaches a specified stock price or specified return on the stock price ( price appreciation plus dividends ) and are valued on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation . performance based awards are earned when maa reaches certain operational goals such as funds from operations , or ffo , targets and are valued based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant as well as the probability of reaching the stated targets . maa remeasures the fair value of the performance based awards each balance sheet date with adjustments made on a cumulative basis until the award is settled and the final compensation is known . the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , was $ 71.85 , $ 84.53 and $ 73.20 , respectively . the following is a summary of the key assumptions used in the valuation calculations for market based awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk free rate</td><td>1.61% ( 1.61 % ) - 2.14% ( 2.14 % )</td><td>0.65% ( 0.65 % ) - 1.57% ( 1.57 % )</td><td>0.49% ( 0.49 % ) - 1.27% ( 1.27 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>3.884% ( 3.884 % )</td><td>3.573% ( 3.573 % )</td><td>3.634% ( 3.634 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>15.05% ( 15.05 % ) - 17.18% ( 17.18 % )</td><td>20.43% ( 20.43 % ) - 21.85% ( 21.85 % )</td><td>18.41% ( 18.41 % ) - 19.45% ( 19.45 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>requisite service period</td><td>3 years</td><td>3 years</td><td>3 years</td></tr></table> the risk free rate was based on a zero coupon risk-free rate . the minimum risk free rate was based on a period of 0.25 years for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 . the maximum risk free rate was based on a period of 3 years for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 . the dividend yield was based on the closing stock price of maa stock on the .
Question: what is the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock in 2017?
Answer: 84.53
Question: what about in 2016?
| 73.2 |
CONVFINQA5241 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
5 . stock based compensation overview maa accounts for its stock based employee compensation plans in accordance with accounting standards governing stock based compensation . these standards require an entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based on the award's fair value on the grant date and recognize the cost over the period during which the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award , which is generally the vesting period . any liability awards issued are remeasured at each reporting period . maa 2019s stock compensation plans consist of a number of incentives provided to attract and retain independent directors , executive officers and key employees . incentives are currently granted under the second amended and restated 2013 stock incentive plan , or the stock plan , which was approved at the 2018 annual meeting of maa shareholders . the stock plan allows for the grant of restricted stock and stock options up to 2000000 shares . maa believes that such awards better align the interests of its employees with those of its shareholders . compensation expense is generally recognized for service based restricted stock awards using the straight-line method over the vesting period of the shares regardless of cliff or ratable vesting distinctions . compensation expense for market and performance based restricted stock awards is generally recognized using the accelerated amortization method with each vesting tranche valued as a separate award , with a separate vesting date , consistent with the estimated value of the award at each period end . additionally , compensation expense is adjusted for actual forfeitures for all awards in the period that the award was forfeited . compensation expense for stock options is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period . maa presents stock compensation expense in the consolidated statements of operations in "general and administrative expenses" . total compensation expense under the stock plan was $ 12.9 million , $ 10.8 million and $ 12.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . of these amounts , total compensation expense capitalized was $ 0.5 million , $ 0.2 million and $ 0.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total unrecognized compensation expense was $ 13.5 million . this cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted average period of 1.1 years . total cash paid for the settlement of plan shares totaled $ 2.9 million , $ 4.8 million and $ 2.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . information concerning grants under the stock plan is provided below . restricted stock in general , restricted stock is earned based on either a service condition , performance condition , or market condition , or a combination thereof , and generally vests ratably over a period from 1 year to 5 years . service based awards are earned when the employee remains employed over the requisite service period and are valued on the grant date based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant . market based awards are earned when maa reaches a specified stock price or specified return on the stock price ( price appreciation plus dividends ) and are valued on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation . performance based awards are earned when maa reaches certain operational goals such as funds from operations , or ffo , targets and are valued based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant as well as the probability of reaching the stated targets . maa remeasures the fair value of the performance based awards each balance sheet date with adjustments made on a cumulative basis until the award is settled and the final compensation is known . the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , was $ 71.85 , $ 84.53 and $ 73.20 , respectively . the following is a summary of the key assumptions used in the valuation calculations for market based awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk free rate</td><td>1.61% ( 1.61 % ) - 2.14% ( 2.14 % )</td><td>0.65% ( 0.65 % ) - 1.57% ( 1.57 % )</td><td>0.49% ( 0.49 % ) - 1.27% ( 1.27 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>3.884% ( 3.884 % )</td><td>3.573% ( 3.573 % )</td><td>3.634% ( 3.634 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>15.05% ( 15.05 % ) - 17.18% ( 17.18 % )</td><td>20.43% ( 20.43 % ) - 21.85% ( 21.85 % )</td><td>18.41% ( 18.41 % ) - 19.45% ( 19.45 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>requisite service period</td><td>3 years</td><td>3 years</td><td>3 years</td></tr></table> the risk free rate was based on a zero coupon risk-free rate . the minimum risk free rate was based on a period of 0.25 years for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 . the maximum risk free rate was based on a period of 3 years for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 . the dividend yield was based on the closing stock price of maa stock on the .
Question: what is the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock in 2017?
Answer: 84.53
Question: what about in 2016?
Answer: 73.2
Question: what is the net change?
| 11.33 |
CONVFINQA5242 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
5 . stock based compensation overview maa accounts for its stock based employee compensation plans in accordance with accounting standards governing stock based compensation . these standards require an entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based on the award's fair value on the grant date and recognize the cost over the period during which the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award , which is generally the vesting period . any liability awards issued are remeasured at each reporting period . maa 2019s stock compensation plans consist of a number of incentives provided to attract and retain independent directors , executive officers and key employees . incentives are currently granted under the second amended and restated 2013 stock incentive plan , or the stock plan , which was approved at the 2018 annual meeting of maa shareholders . the stock plan allows for the grant of restricted stock and stock options up to 2000000 shares . maa believes that such awards better align the interests of its employees with those of its shareholders . compensation expense is generally recognized for service based restricted stock awards using the straight-line method over the vesting period of the shares regardless of cliff or ratable vesting distinctions . compensation expense for market and performance based restricted stock awards is generally recognized using the accelerated amortization method with each vesting tranche valued as a separate award , with a separate vesting date , consistent with the estimated value of the award at each period end . additionally , compensation expense is adjusted for actual forfeitures for all awards in the period that the award was forfeited . compensation expense for stock options is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period . maa presents stock compensation expense in the consolidated statements of operations in "general and administrative expenses" . total compensation expense under the stock plan was $ 12.9 million , $ 10.8 million and $ 12.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . of these amounts , total compensation expense capitalized was $ 0.5 million , $ 0.2 million and $ 0.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total unrecognized compensation expense was $ 13.5 million . this cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted average period of 1.1 years . total cash paid for the settlement of plan shares totaled $ 2.9 million , $ 4.8 million and $ 2.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . information concerning grants under the stock plan is provided below . restricted stock in general , restricted stock is earned based on either a service condition , performance condition , or market condition , or a combination thereof , and generally vests ratably over a period from 1 year to 5 years . service based awards are earned when the employee remains employed over the requisite service period and are valued on the grant date based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant . market based awards are earned when maa reaches a specified stock price or specified return on the stock price ( price appreciation plus dividends ) and are valued on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation . performance based awards are earned when maa reaches certain operational goals such as funds from operations , or ffo , targets and are valued based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant as well as the probability of reaching the stated targets . maa remeasures the fair value of the performance based awards each balance sheet date with adjustments made on a cumulative basis until the award is settled and the final compensation is known . the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , was $ 71.85 , $ 84.53 and $ 73.20 , respectively . the following is a summary of the key assumptions used in the valuation calculations for market based awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk free rate</td><td>1.61% ( 1.61 % ) - 2.14% ( 2.14 % )</td><td>0.65% ( 0.65 % ) - 1.57% ( 1.57 % )</td><td>0.49% ( 0.49 % ) - 1.27% ( 1.27 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>3.884% ( 3.884 % )</td><td>3.573% ( 3.573 % )</td><td>3.634% ( 3.634 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>15.05% ( 15.05 % ) - 17.18% ( 17.18 % )</td><td>20.43% ( 20.43 % ) - 21.85% ( 21.85 % )</td><td>18.41% ( 18.41 % ) - 19.45% ( 19.45 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>requisite service period</td><td>3 years</td><td>3 years</td><td>3 years</td></tr></table> the risk free rate was based on a zero coupon risk-free rate . the minimum risk free rate was based on a period of 0.25 years for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 . the maximum risk free rate was based on a period of 3 years for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 . the dividend yield was based on the closing stock price of maa stock on the .
Question: what is the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock in 2017?
Answer: 84.53
Question: what about in 2016?
Answer: 73.2
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 11.33
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.15478 |
CONVFINQA5243 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
guarantees to third parties . we have , however , issued guar- antees and comfort letters of $ 171 million for the debt and other obligations of unconsolidated affiliates , primarily for cpw . in addition , off-balance sheet arrangements are gener- ally limited to the future payments under noncancelable operating leases , which totaled $ 408 million at may 28 , at may 28 , 2006 , we had invested in four variable interest entities ( vies ) . we are the primary beneficiary ( pb ) of general mills capital , inc . ( gm capital ) , a subsidiary that we consolidate as set forth in note eight to the consoli- dated financial statements appearing on pages 43 and 44 in item eight of this report . we also have an interest in a contract manufacturer at our former facility in geneva , illi- nois . even though we are the pb , we have not consolidated this entity because it is not material to our results of oper- ations , financial condition , or liquidity at may 28 , 2006 . this entity had property and equipment of $ 50 million and long-term debt of $ 50 million at may 28 , 2006 . we are not the pb of the remaining two vies . our maximum exposure to loss from these vies is limited to the $ 150 million minority interest in gm capital , the contract manufactur- er 2019s debt and our $ 6 million of equity investments in the two remaining vies . the following table summarizes our future estimated cash payments under existing contractual obligations , including payments due by period . the majority of the purchase obligations represent commitments for raw mate- rial and packaging to be utilized in the normal course of business and for consumer-directed marketing commit- ments that support our brands . the net fair value of our interest rate and equity swaps was $ 159 million at may 28 , 2006 , based on market values as of that date . future changes in market values will impact the amount of cash ultimately paid or received to settle those instruments in the future . other long-term obligations primarily consist of income taxes , accrued compensation and benefits , and miscella- neous liabilities . we are unable to estimate the timing of the payments for these items . we do not have significant statutory or contractual funding requirements for our defined-benefit retirement and other postretirement benefit plans . further information on these plans , including our expected contributions for fiscal 2007 , is set forth in note thirteen to the consolidated financial statements appearing on pages 47 through 50 in item eight of this report . in millions , payments due by fiscal year total 2007 2008-09 2010-11 2012 and thereafter . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millionspayments dueby fiscal year</td><td>total</td><td>2007</td><td>2008-09</td><td>2010-11</td><td>2012 andthereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 4546</td><td>$ 2131</td><td>$ 971</td><td>$ 55</td><td>$ 1389</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accrued interest</td><td>152</td><td>152</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating leases</td><td>408</td><td>92</td><td>142</td><td>89</td><td>85</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchaseobligations</td><td>2351</td><td>2068</td><td>144</td><td>75</td><td>64</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 7457</td><td>$ 4443</td><td>$ 1257</td><td>$ 219</td><td>$ 1538</td></tr></table> significant accounting estimates for a complete description of our significant accounting policies , please see note one to the consolidated financial statements appearing on pages 35 through 37 in item eight of this report . our significant accounting estimates are those that have meaningful impact on the reporting of our financial condition and results of operations . these poli- cies include our accounting for trade and consumer promotion activities ; goodwill and other intangible asset impairments ; income taxes ; and pension and other postretirement benefits . trade and consumer promotion activities we report sales net of certain coupon and trade promotion costs . the consumer coupon costs recorded as a reduction of sales are based on the estimated redemption value of those coupons , as determined by historical patterns of coupon redemption and consideration of current market conditions such as competitive activity in those product categories . the trade promotion costs include payments to customers to perform merchandising activities on our behalf , such as advertising or in-store displays , discounts to our list prices to lower retail shelf prices , and payments to gain distribution of new products . the cost of these activi- ties is recognized as the related revenue is recorded , which generally precedes the actual cash expenditure . the recog- nition of these costs requires estimation of customer participation and performance levels . these estimates are made based on the quantity of customer sales , the timing and forecasted costs of promotional activities , and other factors . differences between estimated expenses and actual costs are normally insignificant and are recognized as a change in management estimate in a subsequent period . our accrued trade and consumer promotion liability was $ 339 million as of may 28 , 2006 , and $ 283 million as of may 29 , 2005 . our unit volume in the last week of each quarter is consis- tently higher than the average for the preceding weeks of the quarter . in comparison to the average daily shipments in the first 12 weeks of a quarter , the final week of each quarter has approximately two to four days 2019 worth of incre- mental shipments ( based on a five-day week ) , reflecting increased promotional activity at the end of the quarter . this increased activity includes promotions to assure that our customers have sufficient inventory on hand to support major marketing events or increased seasonal demand early in the next quarter , as well as promotions intended to help achieve interim unit volume targets . if , due to quarter-end promotions or other reasons , our customers purchase more product in any reporting period than end-consumer demand will require in future periods , our sales level in future reporting periods could be adversely affected. .
Question: what was the difference in accrued trade and consumer promotion liability as of 5/28/06 and 5/29/05?
| 56.0 |
CONVFINQA5244 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
guarantees to third parties . we have , however , issued guar- antees and comfort letters of $ 171 million for the debt and other obligations of unconsolidated affiliates , primarily for cpw . in addition , off-balance sheet arrangements are gener- ally limited to the future payments under noncancelable operating leases , which totaled $ 408 million at may 28 , at may 28 , 2006 , we had invested in four variable interest entities ( vies ) . we are the primary beneficiary ( pb ) of general mills capital , inc . ( gm capital ) , a subsidiary that we consolidate as set forth in note eight to the consoli- dated financial statements appearing on pages 43 and 44 in item eight of this report . we also have an interest in a contract manufacturer at our former facility in geneva , illi- nois . even though we are the pb , we have not consolidated this entity because it is not material to our results of oper- ations , financial condition , or liquidity at may 28 , 2006 . this entity had property and equipment of $ 50 million and long-term debt of $ 50 million at may 28 , 2006 . we are not the pb of the remaining two vies . our maximum exposure to loss from these vies is limited to the $ 150 million minority interest in gm capital , the contract manufactur- er 2019s debt and our $ 6 million of equity investments in the two remaining vies . the following table summarizes our future estimated cash payments under existing contractual obligations , including payments due by period . the majority of the purchase obligations represent commitments for raw mate- rial and packaging to be utilized in the normal course of business and for consumer-directed marketing commit- ments that support our brands . the net fair value of our interest rate and equity swaps was $ 159 million at may 28 , 2006 , based on market values as of that date . future changes in market values will impact the amount of cash ultimately paid or received to settle those instruments in the future . other long-term obligations primarily consist of income taxes , accrued compensation and benefits , and miscella- neous liabilities . we are unable to estimate the timing of the payments for these items . we do not have significant statutory or contractual funding requirements for our defined-benefit retirement and other postretirement benefit plans . further information on these plans , including our expected contributions for fiscal 2007 , is set forth in note thirteen to the consolidated financial statements appearing on pages 47 through 50 in item eight of this report . in millions , payments due by fiscal year total 2007 2008-09 2010-11 2012 and thereafter . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millionspayments dueby fiscal year</td><td>total</td><td>2007</td><td>2008-09</td><td>2010-11</td><td>2012 andthereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 4546</td><td>$ 2131</td><td>$ 971</td><td>$ 55</td><td>$ 1389</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accrued interest</td><td>152</td><td>152</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating leases</td><td>408</td><td>92</td><td>142</td><td>89</td><td>85</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchaseobligations</td><td>2351</td><td>2068</td><td>144</td><td>75</td><td>64</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 7457</td><td>$ 4443</td><td>$ 1257</td><td>$ 219</td><td>$ 1538</td></tr></table> significant accounting estimates for a complete description of our significant accounting policies , please see note one to the consolidated financial statements appearing on pages 35 through 37 in item eight of this report . our significant accounting estimates are those that have meaningful impact on the reporting of our financial condition and results of operations . these poli- cies include our accounting for trade and consumer promotion activities ; goodwill and other intangible asset impairments ; income taxes ; and pension and other postretirement benefits . trade and consumer promotion activities we report sales net of certain coupon and trade promotion costs . the consumer coupon costs recorded as a reduction of sales are based on the estimated redemption value of those coupons , as determined by historical patterns of coupon redemption and consideration of current market conditions such as competitive activity in those product categories . the trade promotion costs include payments to customers to perform merchandising activities on our behalf , such as advertising or in-store displays , discounts to our list prices to lower retail shelf prices , and payments to gain distribution of new products . the cost of these activi- ties is recognized as the related revenue is recorded , which generally precedes the actual cash expenditure . the recog- nition of these costs requires estimation of customer participation and performance levels . these estimates are made based on the quantity of customer sales , the timing and forecasted costs of promotional activities , and other factors . differences between estimated expenses and actual costs are normally insignificant and are recognized as a change in management estimate in a subsequent period . our accrued trade and consumer promotion liability was $ 339 million as of may 28 , 2006 , and $ 283 million as of may 29 , 2005 . our unit volume in the last week of each quarter is consis- tently higher than the average for the preceding weeks of the quarter . in comparison to the average daily shipments in the first 12 weeks of a quarter , the final week of each quarter has approximately two to four days 2019 worth of incre- mental shipments ( based on a five-day week ) , reflecting increased promotional activity at the end of the quarter . this increased activity includes promotions to assure that our customers have sufficient inventory on hand to support major marketing events or increased seasonal demand early in the next quarter , as well as promotions intended to help achieve interim unit volume targets . if , due to quarter-end promotions or other reasons , our customers purchase more product in any reporting period than end-consumer demand will require in future periods , our sales level in future reporting periods could be adversely affected. .
Question: what was the difference in accrued trade and consumer promotion liability as of 5/28/06 and 5/29/05?
Answer: 56.0
Question: so what was the percentage change during this time?
| 0.19788 |
CONVFINQA5245 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
disclosure of , the issuance of certain types of guarantees . the adoption of fasb interpretation no . 45 did not have a signif- icant impact on the net income or equity of the company . in january 2003 , fasb interpretation no . 46 , 201cconsolidation of variable interest entities , an interpretation of arb 51 , 201d was issued . the primary objectives of this interpretation , as amended , are to provide guidance on the identification and consolidation of variable interest entities , or vies , which are entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights . the company has completed an analysis of this interpretation and has determined that it does not have any vies . 4 . acquisitions family health plan , inc . effective january 1 , 2004 , the company commenced opera- tions in ohio through the acquisition from family health plan , inc . of certain medicaid-related assets for a purchase price of approximately $ 6800 . the cost to acquire the medicaid-related assets will be allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed according to estimated fair values . hmo blue texas effective august 1 , 2003 , the company acquired certain medicaid-related contract rights of hmo blue texas in the san antonio , texas market for $ 1045 . the purchase price was allocated to acquired contracts , which are being amor- tized on a straight-line basis over a period of five years , the expected period of benefit . group practice affiliates during 2003 , the company acquired a 100% ( 100 % ) ownership interest in group practice affiliates , llc , a behavioral healthcare services company ( 63.7% ( 63.7 % ) in march 2003 and 36.3% ( 36.3 % ) in august 2003 ) . the consolidated financial state- ments include the results of operations of gpa since march 1 , 2003 . the company paid $ 1800 for its purchase of gpa . the cost to acquire the ownership interest has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed according to estimated fair values and is subject to adjustment when additional information concerning asset and liability valuations are finalized . the preliminary allocation has resulted in goodwill of approximately $ 3895 . the goodwill is not amortized and is not deductible for tax purposes . pro forma disclosures related to the acquisition have been excluded as immaterial . scriptassist in march 2003 , the company purchased contract and name rights of scriptassist , llc ( scriptassist ) , a medication com- pliance company . the purchase price of $ 563 was allocated to acquired contracts , which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of five years , the expected period of benefit . the investor group who held membership interests in scriptassist included one of the company 2019s executive officers . university health plans , inc . on december 1 , 2002 , the company purchased 80% ( 80 % ) of the outstanding capital stock of university health plans , inc . ( uhp ) in new jersey . in october 2003 , the company exercised its option to purchase the remaining 20% ( 20 % ) of the outstanding capital stock . centene paid a total purchase price of $ 13258 . the results of operations for uhp are included in the consolidated financial statements since december 1 , 2002 . the acquisition of uhp resulted in identified intangible assets of $ 3800 , representing purchased contract rights and provider network . the intangibles are being amortized over a ten-year period . goodwill of $ 7940 is not amortized and is not deductible for tax purposes . changes during 2003 to the preliminary purchase price allocation primarily consisted of the purchase of the remaining 20% ( 20 % ) of the outstanding stock and the recognition of intangible assets and related deferred tax liabilities . the following unaudited pro forma information presents the results of operations of centene and subsidiaries as if the uhp acquisition described above had occurred as of january 1 , 2001 . these pro forma results may not necessar- ily reflect the actual results of operations that would have been achieved , nor are they necessarily indicative of future results of operations. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 567048</td><td>$ 395155</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net earnings</td><td>25869</td><td>11573</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>1.48</td><td>1.00</td></tr></table> diluted earnings per common share 1.48 1.00 texas universities health plan in june 2002 , the company purchased schip contracts in three texas service areas . the cash purchase price of $ 595 was recorded as purchased contract rights , which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over five years , the expected period of benefit . bankers reserve in march 2002 , the company acquired bankers reserve life insurance company of wisconsin for a cash purchase price of $ 3527 . the company allocated the purchase price to net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their fair value . centene allocated $ 479 to identifiable intangible assets , representing the value assigned to acquired licenses , which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) centene corporation and subsidiaries .
Question: what is the revenue in 2002?
| 567048.0 |
CONVFINQA5246 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
disclosure of , the issuance of certain types of guarantees . the adoption of fasb interpretation no . 45 did not have a signif- icant impact on the net income or equity of the company . in january 2003 , fasb interpretation no . 46 , 201cconsolidation of variable interest entities , an interpretation of arb 51 , 201d was issued . the primary objectives of this interpretation , as amended , are to provide guidance on the identification and consolidation of variable interest entities , or vies , which are entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights . the company has completed an analysis of this interpretation and has determined that it does not have any vies . 4 . acquisitions family health plan , inc . effective january 1 , 2004 , the company commenced opera- tions in ohio through the acquisition from family health plan , inc . of certain medicaid-related assets for a purchase price of approximately $ 6800 . the cost to acquire the medicaid-related assets will be allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed according to estimated fair values . hmo blue texas effective august 1 , 2003 , the company acquired certain medicaid-related contract rights of hmo blue texas in the san antonio , texas market for $ 1045 . the purchase price was allocated to acquired contracts , which are being amor- tized on a straight-line basis over a period of five years , the expected period of benefit . group practice affiliates during 2003 , the company acquired a 100% ( 100 % ) ownership interest in group practice affiliates , llc , a behavioral healthcare services company ( 63.7% ( 63.7 % ) in march 2003 and 36.3% ( 36.3 % ) in august 2003 ) . the consolidated financial state- ments include the results of operations of gpa since march 1 , 2003 . the company paid $ 1800 for its purchase of gpa . the cost to acquire the ownership interest has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed according to estimated fair values and is subject to adjustment when additional information concerning asset and liability valuations are finalized . the preliminary allocation has resulted in goodwill of approximately $ 3895 . the goodwill is not amortized and is not deductible for tax purposes . pro forma disclosures related to the acquisition have been excluded as immaterial . scriptassist in march 2003 , the company purchased contract and name rights of scriptassist , llc ( scriptassist ) , a medication com- pliance company . the purchase price of $ 563 was allocated to acquired contracts , which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of five years , the expected period of benefit . the investor group who held membership interests in scriptassist included one of the company 2019s executive officers . university health plans , inc . on december 1 , 2002 , the company purchased 80% ( 80 % ) of the outstanding capital stock of university health plans , inc . ( uhp ) in new jersey . in october 2003 , the company exercised its option to purchase the remaining 20% ( 20 % ) of the outstanding capital stock . centene paid a total purchase price of $ 13258 . the results of operations for uhp are included in the consolidated financial statements since december 1 , 2002 . the acquisition of uhp resulted in identified intangible assets of $ 3800 , representing purchased contract rights and provider network . the intangibles are being amortized over a ten-year period . goodwill of $ 7940 is not amortized and is not deductible for tax purposes . changes during 2003 to the preliminary purchase price allocation primarily consisted of the purchase of the remaining 20% ( 20 % ) of the outstanding stock and the recognition of intangible assets and related deferred tax liabilities . the following unaudited pro forma information presents the results of operations of centene and subsidiaries as if the uhp acquisition described above had occurred as of january 1 , 2001 . these pro forma results may not necessar- ily reflect the actual results of operations that would have been achieved , nor are they necessarily indicative of future results of operations. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 567048</td><td>$ 395155</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net earnings</td><td>25869</td><td>11573</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>1.48</td><td>1.00</td></tr></table> diluted earnings per common share 1.48 1.00 texas universities health plan in june 2002 , the company purchased schip contracts in three texas service areas . the cash purchase price of $ 595 was recorded as purchased contract rights , which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over five years , the expected period of benefit . bankers reserve in march 2002 , the company acquired bankers reserve life insurance company of wisconsin for a cash purchase price of $ 3527 . the company allocated the purchase price to net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their fair value . centene allocated $ 479 to identifiable intangible assets , representing the value assigned to acquired licenses , which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) centene corporation and subsidiaries .
Question: what is the revenue in 2002?
Answer: 567048.0
Question: what about in 2001?
| 395155.0 |
CONVFINQA5247 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
disclosure of , the issuance of certain types of guarantees . the adoption of fasb interpretation no . 45 did not have a signif- icant impact on the net income or equity of the company . in january 2003 , fasb interpretation no . 46 , 201cconsolidation of variable interest entities , an interpretation of arb 51 , 201d was issued . the primary objectives of this interpretation , as amended , are to provide guidance on the identification and consolidation of variable interest entities , or vies , which are entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights . the company has completed an analysis of this interpretation and has determined that it does not have any vies . 4 . acquisitions family health plan , inc . effective january 1 , 2004 , the company commenced opera- tions in ohio through the acquisition from family health plan , inc . of certain medicaid-related assets for a purchase price of approximately $ 6800 . the cost to acquire the medicaid-related assets will be allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed according to estimated fair values . hmo blue texas effective august 1 , 2003 , the company acquired certain medicaid-related contract rights of hmo blue texas in the san antonio , texas market for $ 1045 . the purchase price was allocated to acquired contracts , which are being amor- tized on a straight-line basis over a period of five years , the expected period of benefit . group practice affiliates during 2003 , the company acquired a 100% ( 100 % ) ownership interest in group practice affiliates , llc , a behavioral healthcare services company ( 63.7% ( 63.7 % ) in march 2003 and 36.3% ( 36.3 % ) in august 2003 ) . the consolidated financial state- ments include the results of operations of gpa since march 1 , 2003 . the company paid $ 1800 for its purchase of gpa . the cost to acquire the ownership interest has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed according to estimated fair values and is subject to adjustment when additional information concerning asset and liability valuations are finalized . the preliminary allocation has resulted in goodwill of approximately $ 3895 . the goodwill is not amortized and is not deductible for tax purposes . pro forma disclosures related to the acquisition have been excluded as immaterial . scriptassist in march 2003 , the company purchased contract and name rights of scriptassist , llc ( scriptassist ) , a medication com- pliance company . the purchase price of $ 563 was allocated to acquired contracts , which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of five years , the expected period of benefit . the investor group who held membership interests in scriptassist included one of the company 2019s executive officers . university health plans , inc . on december 1 , 2002 , the company purchased 80% ( 80 % ) of the outstanding capital stock of university health plans , inc . ( uhp ) in new jersey . in october 2003 , the company exercised its option to purchase the remaining 20% ( 20 % ) of the outstanding capital stock . centene paid a total purchase price of $ 13258 . the results of operations for uhp are included in the consolidated financial statements since december 1 , 2002 . the acquisition of uhp resulted in identified intangible assets of $ 3800 , representing purchased contract rights and provider network . the intangibles are being amortized over a ten-year period . goodwill of $ 7940 is not amortized and is not deductible for tax purposes . changes during 2003 to the preliminary purchase price allocation primarily consisted of the purchase of the remaining 20% ( 20 % ) of the outstanding stock and the recognition of intangible assets and related deferred tax liabilities . the following unaudited pro forma information presents the results of operations of centene and subsidiaries as if the uhp acquisition described above had occurred as of january 1 , 2001 . these pro forma results may not necessar- ily reflect the actual results of operations that would have been achieved , nor are they necessarily indicative of future results of operations. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 567048</td><td>$ 395155</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net earnings</td><td>25869</td><td>11573</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>1.48</td><td>1.00</td></tr></table> diluted earnings per common share 1.48 1.00 texas universities health plan in june 2002 , the company purchased schip contracts in three texas service areas . the cash purchase price of $ 595 was recorded as purchased contract rights , which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over five years , the expected period of benefit . bankers reserve in march 2002 , the company acquired bankers reserve life insurance company of wisconsin for a cash purchase price of $ 3527 . the company allocated the purchase price to net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their fair value . centene allocated $ 479 to identifiable intangible assets , representing the value assigned to acquired licenses , which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) centene corporation and subsidiaries .
Question: what is the revenue in 2002?
Answer: 567048.0
Question: what about in 2001?
Answer: 395155.0
Question: what is the net change?
| 171893.0 |
CONVFINQA5248 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
disclosure of , the issuance of certain types of guarantees . the adoption of fasb interpretation no . 45 did not have a signif- icant impact on the net income or equity of the company . in january 2003 , fasb interpretation no . 46 , 201cconsolidation of variable interest entities , an interpretation of arb 51 , 201d was issued . the primary objectives of this interpretation , as amended , are to provide guidance on the identification and consolidation of variable interest entities , or vies , which are entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights . the company has completed an analysis of this interpretation and has determined that it does not have any vies . 4 . acquisitions family health plan , inc . effective january 1 , 2004 , the company commenced opera- tions in ohio through the acquisition from family health plan , inc . of certain medicaid-related assets for a purchase price of approximately $ 6800 . the cost to acquire the medicaid-related assets will be allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed according to estimated fair values . hmo blue texas effective august 1 , 2003 , the company acquired certain medicaid-related contract rights of hmo blue texas in the san antonio , texas market for $ 1045 . the purchase price was allocated to acquired contracts , which are being amor- tized on a straight-line basis over a period of five years , the expected period of benefit . group practice affiliates during 2003 , the company acquired a 100% ( 100 % ) ownership interest in group practice affiliates , llc , a behavioral healthcare services company ( 63.7% ( 63.7 % ) in march 2003 and 36.3% ( 36.3 % ) in august 2003 ) . the consolidated financial state- ments include the results of operations of gpa since march 1 , 2003 . the company paid $ 1800 for its purchase of gpa . the cost to acquire the ownership interest has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed according to estimated fair values and is subject to adjustment when additional information concerning asset and liability valuations are finalized . the preliminary allocation has resulted in goodwill of approximately $ 3895 . the goodwill is not amortized and is not deductible for tax purposes . pro forma disclosures related to the acquisition have been excluded as immaterial . scriptassist in march 2003 , the company purchased contract and name rights of scriptassist , llc ( scriptassist ) , a medication com- pliance company . the purchase price of $ 563 was allocated to acquired contracts , which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of five years , the expected period of benefit . the investor group who held membership interests in scriptassist included one of the company 2019s executive officers . university health plans , inc . on december 1 , 2002 , the company purchased 80% ( 80 % ) of the outstanding capital stock of university health plans , inc . ( uhp ) in new jersey . in october 2003 , the company exercised its option to purchase the remaining 20% ( 20 % ) of the outstanding capital stock . centene paid a total purchase price of $ 13258 . the results of operations for uhp are included in the consolidated financial statements since december 1 , 2002 . the acquisition of uhp resulted in identified intangible assets of $ 3800 , representing purchased contract rights and provider network . the intangibles are being amortized over a ten-year period . goodwill of $ 7940 is not amortized and is not deductible for tax purposes . changes during 2003 to the preliminary purchase price allocation primarily consisted of the purchase of the remaining 20% ( 20 % ) of the outstanding stock and the recognition of intangible assets and related deferred tax liabilities . the following unaudited pro forma information presents the results of operations of centene and subsidiaries as if the uhp acquisition described above had occurred as of january 1 , 2001 . these pro forma results may not necessar- ily reflect the actual results of operations that would have been achieved , nor are they necessarily indicative of future results of operations. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 567048</td><td>$ 395155</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net earnings</td><td>25869</td><td>11573</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>1.48</td><td>1.00</td></tr></table> diluted earnings per common share 1.48 1.00 texas universities health plan in june 2002 , the company purchased schip contracts in three texas service areas . the cash purchase price of $ 595 was recorded as purchased contract rights , which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over five years , the expected period of benefit . bankers reserve in march 2002 , the company acquired bankers reserve life insurance company of wisconsin for a cash purchase price of $ 3527 . the company allocated the purchase price to net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their fair value . centene allocated $ 479 to identifiable intangible assets , representing the value assigned to acquired licenses , which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) centene corporation and subsidiaries .
Question: what is the revenue in 2002?
Answer: 567048.0
Question: what about in 2001?
Answer: 395155.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 171893.0
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
| 0.435 |
CONVFINQA5249 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 17 . accumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( losses ) earnings ( in millions )</td><td>( losses ) earnings 2017</td><td>( losses ) earnings 2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>currency translation adjustments</td><td>$ -5761 ( 5761 )</td><td>$ -6091 ( 6091 )</td><td>$ -6129 ( 6129 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>pension and other benefits</td><td>-2816 ( 2816 )</td><td>-3565 ( 3565 )</td><td>-3332 ( 3332 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>derivatives accounted for as hedges</td><td>42</td><td>97</td><td>59</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total accumulated other comprehensive losses</td><td>$ -8535 ( 8535 )</td><td>$ -9559 ( 9559 )</td><td>$ -9402 ( 9402 )</td></tr></table> reclassifications from other comprehensive earnings the movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact , for each of the components above , that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement are shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 . for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , $ 2 million , $ ( 5 ) million and $ 1 million of net currency translation adjustment gains/ ( losses ) were transferred from other comprehensive earnings to marketing , administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings , respectively , upon liquidation of subsidiaries . for additional information , see note 13 . benefit plans and note 15 . financial instruments for disclosures related to pmi's pension and other benefits and derivative financial instruments . note 18 . contingencies : tobacco-related litigation legal proceedings covering a wide range of matters are pending or threatened against us , and/or our subsidiaries , and/or our indemnitees in various jurisdictions . our indemnitees include distributors , licensees and others that have been named as parties in certain cases and that we have agreed to defend , as well as to pay costs and some or all of judgments , if any , that may be entered against them . pursuant to the terms of the distribution agreement between altria group , inc . ( "altria" ) and pmi , pmi will indemnify altria and philip morris usa inc . ( "pm usa" ) , a u.s . tobacco subsidiary of altria , for tobacco product claims based in substantial part on products manufactured by pmi or contract manufactured for pmi by pm usa , and pm usa will indemnify pmi for tobacco product claims based in substantial part on products manufactured by pm usa , excluding tobacco products contract manufactured for pmi . it is possible that there could be adverse developments in pending cases against us and our subsidiaries . an unfavorable outcome or settlement of pending tobacco-related litigation could encourage the commencement of additional litigation . damages claimed in some of the tobacco-related litigation are significant and , in certain cases in brazil , canada and nigeria , range into the billions of u.s . dollars . the variability in pleadings in multiple jurisdictions , together with the actual experience of management in litigating claims , demonstrate that the monetary relief that may be specified in a lawsuit bears little relevance to the ultimate outcome . much of the tobacco-related litigation is in its early stages , and litigation is subject to uncertainty . however , as discussed below , we have to date been largely successful in defending tobacco-related litigation . we and our subsidiaries record provisions in the consolidated financial statements for pending litigation when we determine that an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated . at the present time , while it is reasonably possible that an unfavorable outcome in a case may occur , after assessing the information available to it ( i ) management has not concluded that it is probable that a loss has been incurred in any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; ( ii ) management is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss for any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; and ( iii ) accordingly , no estimated loss has been accrued in the consolidated financial statements for unfavorable outcomes in these cases , if any . legal defense costs are expensed as incurred. .
Question: what is the adjustment in currency translation in 2017?
| -5761.0 |
CONVFINQA5250 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 17 . accumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( losses ) earnings ( in millions )</td><td>( losses ) earnings 2017</td><td>( losses ) earnings 2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>currency translation adjustments</td><td>$ -5761 ( 5761 )</td><td>$ -6091 ( 6091 )</td><td>$ -6129 ( 6129 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>pension and other benefits</td><td>-2816 ( 2816 )</td><td>-3565 ( 3565 )</td><td>-3332 ( 3332 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>derivatives accounted for as hedges</td><td>42</td><td>97</td><td>59</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total accumulated other comprehensive losses</td><td>$ -8535 ( 8535 )</td><td>$ -9559 ( 9559 )</td><td>$ -9402 ( 9402 )</td></tr></table> reclassifications from other comprehensive earnings the movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact , for each of the components above , that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement are shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 . for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , $ 2 million , $ ( 5 ) million and $ 1 million of net currency translation adjustment gains/ ( losses ) were transferred from other comprehensive earnings to marketing , administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings , respectively , upon liquidation of subsidiaries . for additional information , see note 13 . benefit plans and note 15 . financial instruments for disclosures related to pmi's pension and other benefits and derivative financial instruments . note 18 . contingencies : tobacco-related litigation legal proceedings covering a wide range of matters are pending or threatened against us , and/or our subsidiaries , and/or our indemnitees in various jurisdictions . our indemnitees include distributors , licensees and others that have been named as parties in certain cases and that we have agreed to defend , as well as to pay costs and some or all of judgments , if any , that may be entered against them . pursuant to the terms of the distribution agreement between altria group , inc . ( "altria" ) and pmi , pmi will indemnify altria and philip morris usa inc . ( "pm usa" ) , a u.s . tobacco subsidiary of altria , for tobacco product claims based in substantial part on products manufactured by pmi or contract manufactured for pmi by pm usa , and pm usa will indemnify pmi for tobacco product claims based in substantial part on products manufactured by pm usa , excluding tobacco products contract manufactured for pmi . it is possible that there could be adverse developments in pending cases against us and our subsidiaries . an unfavorable outcome or settlement of pending tobacco-related litigation could encourage the commencement of additional litigation . damages claimed in some of the tobacco-related litigation are significant and , in certain cases in brazil , canada and nigeria , range into the billions of u.s . dollars . the variability in pleadings in multiple jurisdictions , together with the actual experience of management in litigating claims , demonstrate that the monetary relief that may be specified in a lawsuit bears little relevance to the ultimate outcome . much of the tobacco-related litigation is in its early stages , and litigation is subject to uncertainty . however , as discussed below , we have to date been largely successful in defending tobacco-related litigation . we and our subsidiaries record provisions in the consolidated financial statements for pending litigation when we determine that an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated . at the present time , while it is reasonably possible that an unfavorable outcome in a case may occur , after assessing the information available to it ( i ) management has not concluded that it is probable that a loss has been incurred in any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; ( ii ) management is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss for any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; and ( iii ) accordingly , no estimated loss has been accrued in the consolidated financial statements for unfavorable outcomes in these cases , if any . legal defense costs are expensed as incurred. .
Question: what is the adjustment in currency translation in 2017?
Answer: -5761.0
Question: what about in 2016?
| -6091.0 |
CONVFINQA5251 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 17 . accumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( losses ) earnings ( in millions )</td><td>( losses ) earnings 2017</td><td>( losses ) earnings 2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>currency translation adjustments</td><td>$ -5761 ( 5761 )</td><td>$ -6091 ( 6091 )</td><td>$ -6129 ( 6129 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>pension and other benefits</td><td>-2816 ( 2816 )</td><td>-3565 ( 3565 )</td><td>-3332 ( 3332 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>derivatives accounted for as hedges</td><td>42</td><td>97</td><td>59</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total accumulated other comprehensive losses</td><td>$ -8535 ( 8535 )</td><td>$ -9559 ( 9559 )</td><td>$ -9402 ( 9402 )</td></tr></table> reclassifications from other comprehensive earnings the movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact , for each of the components above , that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement are shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 . for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , $ 2 million , $ ( 5 ) million and $ 1 million of net currency translation adjustment gains/ ( losses ) were transferred from other comprehensive earnings to marketing , administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings , respectively , upon liquidation of subsidiaries . for additional information , see note 13 . benefit plans and note 15 . financial instruments for disclosures related to pmi's pension and other benefits and derivative financial instruments . note 18 . contingencies : tobacco-related litigation legal proceedings covering a wide range of matters are pending or threatened against us , and/or our subsidiaries , and/or our indemnitees in various jurisdictions . our indemnitees include distributors , licensees and others that have been named as parties in certain cases and that we have agreed to defend , as well as to pay costs and some or all of judgments , if any , that may be entered against them . pursuant to the terms of the distribution agreement between altria group , inc . ( "altria" ) and pmi , pmi will indemnify altria and philip morris usa inc . ( "pm usa" ) , a u.s . tobacco subsidiary of altria , for tobacco product claims based in substantial part on products manufactured by pmi or contract manufactured for pmi by pm usa , and pm usa will indemnify pmi for tobacco product claims based in substantial part on products manufactured by pm usa , excluding tobacco products contract manufactured for pmi . it is possible that there could be adverse developments in pending cases against us and our subsidiaries . an unfavorable outcome or settlement of pending tobacco-related litigation could encourage the commencement of additional litigation . damages claimed in some of the tobacco-related litigation are significant and , in certain cases in brazil , canada and nigeria , range into the billions of u.s . dollars . the variability in pleadings in multiple jurisdictions , together with the actual experience of management in litigating claims , demonstrate that the monetary relief that may be specified in a lawsuit bears little relevance to the ultimate outcome . much of the tobacco-related litigation is in its early stages , and litigation is subject to uncertainty . however , as discussed below , we have to date been largely successful in defending tobacco-related litigation . we and our subsidiaries record provisions in the consolidated financial statements for pending litigation when we determine that an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated . at the present time , while it is reasonably possible that an unfavorable outcome in a case may occur , after assessing the information available to it ( i ) management has not concluded that it is probable that a loss has been incurred in any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; ( ii ) management is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss for any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; and ( iii ) accordingly , no estimated loss has been accrued in the consolidated financial statements for unfavorable outcomes in these cases , if any . legal defense costs are expensed as incurred. .
Question: what is the adjustment in currency translation in 2017?
Answer: -5761.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Answer: -6091.0
Question: what is the net change in adjustments in currency translation from 2016 to 2017?
| 330.0 |
CONVFINQA5252 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 17 . accumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( losses ) earnings ( in millions )</td><td>( losses ) earnings 2017</td><td>( losses ) earnings 2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>currency translation adjustments</td><td>$ -5761 ( 5761 )</td><td>$ -6091 ( 6091 )</td><td>$ -6129 ( 6129 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>pension and other benefits</td><td>-2816 ( 2816 )</td><td>-3565 ( 3565 )</td><td>-3332 ( 3332 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>derivatives accounted for as hedges</td><td>42</td><td>97</td><td>59</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total accumulated other comprehensive losses</td><td>$ -8535 ( 8535 )</td><td>$ -9559 ( 9559 )</td><td>$ -9402 ( 9402 )</td></tr></table> reclassifications from other comprehensive earnings the movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact , for each of the components above , that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement are shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 . for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , $ 2 million , $ ( 5 ) million and $ 1 million of net currency translation adjustment gains/ ( losses ) were transferred from other comprehensive earnings to marketing , administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings , respectively , upon liquidation of subsidiaries . for additional information , see note 13 . benefit plans and note 15 . financial instruments for disclosures related to pmi's pension and other benefits and derivative financial instruments . note 18 . contingencies : tobacco-related litigation legal proceedings covering a wide range of matters are pending or threatened against us , and/or our subsidiaries , and/or our indemnitees in various jurisdictions . our indemnitees include distributors , licensees and others that have been named as parties in certain cases and that we have agreed to defend , as well as to pay costs and some or all of judgments , if any , that may be entered against them . pursuant to the terms of the distribution agreement between altria group , inc . ( "altria" ) and pmi , pmi will indemnify altria and philip morris usa inc . ( "pm usa" ) , a u.s . tobacco subsidiary of altria , for tobacco product claims based in substantial part on products manufactured by pmi or contract manufactured for pmi by pm usa , and pm usa will indemnify pmi for tobacco product claims based in substantial part on products manufactured by pm usa , excluding tobacco products contract manufactured for pmi . it is possible that there could be adverse developments in pending cases against us and our subsidiaries . an unfavorable outcome or settlement of pending tobacco-related litigation could encourage the commencement of additional litigation . damages claimed in some of the tobacco-related litigation are significant and , in certain cases in brazil , canada and nigeria , range into the billions of u.s . dollars . the variability in pleadings in multiple jurisdictions , together with the actual experience of management in litigating claims , demonstrate that the monetary relief that may be specified in a lawsuit bears little relevance to the ultimate outcome . much of the tobacco-related litigation is in its early stages , and litigation is subject to uncertainty . however , as discussed below , we have to date been largely successful in defending tobacco-related litigation . we and our subsidiaries record provisions in the consolidated financial statements for pending litigation when we determine that an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated . at the present time , while it is reasonably possible that an unfavorable outcome in a case may occur , after assessing the information available to it ( i ) management has not concluded that it is probable that a loss has been incurred in any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; ( ii ) management is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss for any of the pending tobacco-related cases ; and ( iii ) accordingly , no estimated loss has been accrued in the consolidated financial statements for unfavorable outcomes in these cases , if any . legal defense costs are expensed as incurred. .
Question: what is the adjustment in currency translation in 2017?
Answer: -5761.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Answer: -6091.0
Question: what is the net change in adjustments in currency translation from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 330.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| -0.05418 |
CONVFINQA5253 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
estimates of synthetic crude oil reserves are prepared by glj petroleum consultants of calgary , canada , third-party consultants . their reports for all years are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead responsible for the estimates of our osm reserves has 34 years of experience in petroleum engineering and has conducted surface mineable oil sands evaluations since 1986 . he is a member of spe , having served as regional director from 1998 through 2001 . the second team member has 13 years of experience in petroleum engineering and has conducted surface mineable oil sands evaluations since 2009 . both are registered practicing professional engineers in the province of alberta . audits of estimates third-party consultants are engaged to provide independent estimates for fields that comprise 80 percent of our total proved reserves over a rolling four-year period for the purpose of auditing the in-house reserve estimates . we met this goal for the four- year period ended december 31 , 2012 . we established a tolerance level of 10 percent such that initial estimates by the third-party consultants are accepted if they are within 10 percent of our internal estimates . should the third-party consultants 2019 initial analysis fail to reach our tolerance level , both our team and the consultants re-examine the information provided , request additional data and refine their analysis if appropriate . this resolution process is continued until both estimates are within 10 percent . in the very limited instances where differences outside the 10 percent tolerance cannot be resolved by year end , a plan to resolve the difference is developed and our senior management is informed . this process did not result in significant changes to our reserve estimates in 2012 or 2011 . there were no third-party audits performed in 2010 . during 2012 , netherland , sewell & associates , inc . ( "nsai" ) prepared a certification of december 31 , 2011 reserves for the alba field in e.g . the nsai summary report is filed as an exhibit to this annual report on form 10-k . members of the nsai team have many years of industry experience , having worked for large , international oil and gas companies before joining nsai . the senior technical advisor has a bachelor of science degree in geophysics and over 15 years of experience in the estimation of and evaluation of reserves . the second member has a bachelor of science degree in chemical engineering and master of business administration along with over 3 years of experience in estimation and evaluation of reserves . both are licensed in the state of texas . ryder scott company ( "ryder scott" ) performed audits of several of our fields in 2012 and 2011 . their summary reports on audits performed in 2012 and 2011 are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead for ryder scott has over 20 years of industry experience , having worked for a major international oil and gas company before joining ryder scott . he has a bachelor of science degree in mechanical engineering , is a member of spe where he served on the oil and gas reserves committee and is a registered professional engineer in the state of texas . changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2012 , 571 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , an increase of 176 mmboe from december 31 , 2011 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2012 : ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>395</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revisions of previous estimates</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>improved recovery</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases of reserves in place</td><td>56</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>extensions discoveries and other additions</td><td>201</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>transfer to proved developed</td><td>-70 ( 70 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>end of year</td><td>571</td></tr></table> significant additions to proved undeveloped reserves during 2012 include 56 mmboe due to acquisitions in the eagle ford shale . development drilling added 124 mmboe in the eagle ford , 35 mmboe in the bakken and 15 mmboe in the oklahoma resource basins shale play . a gas sharing agreement signed with the libyan government in 2012 added 19 mmboe . additionally , 30 mmboe were transferred from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves in the eagle ford and 14 mmboe in the bakken shale plays due to producing wells . costs incurred in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 1995 million $ 1107 million and $ 1463 million . a total of 27 mmboe was booked as a result of reliable technology . technologies included statistical analysis of production performance , decline curve analysis , rate transient analysis , reservoir simulation and volumetric analysis . the statistical nature of production performance coupled with highly certain reservoir continuity or quality within the reliable technology areas and sufficient proved undeveloped locations establish the reasonable certainty criteria required for booking reserves. .
Question: what was the value of undeveloped reserves at the end of the year?
| 571.0 |
CONVFINQA5254 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
estimates of synthetic crude oil reserves are prepared by glj petroleum consultants of calgary , canada , third-party consultants . their reports for all years are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead responsible for the estimates of our osm reserves has 34 years of experience in petroleum engineering and has conducted surface mineable oil sands evaluations since 1986 . he is a member of spe , having served as regional director from 1998 through 2001 . the second team member has 13 years of experience in petroleum engineering and has conducted surface mineable oil sands evaluations since 2009 . both are registered practicing professional engineers in the province of alberta . audits of estimates third-party consultants are engaged to provide independent estimates for fields that comprise 80 percent of our total proved reserves over a rolling four-year period for the purpose of auditing the in-house reserve estimates . we met this goal for the four- year period ended december 31 , 2012 . we established a tolerance level of 10 percent such that initial estimates by the third-party consultants are accepted if they are within 10 percent of our internal estimates . should the third-party consultants 2019 initial analysis fail to reach our tolerance level , both our team and the consultants re-examine the information provided , request additional data and refine their analysis if appropriate . this resolution process is continued until both estimates are within 10 percent . in the very limited instances where differences outside the 10 percent tolerance cannot be resolved by year end , a plan to resolve the difference is developed and our senior management is informed . this process did not result in significant changes to our reserve estimates in 2012 or 2011 . there were no third-party audits performed in 2010 . during 2012 , netherland , sewell & associates , inc . ( "nsai" ) prepared a certification of december 31 , 2011 reserves for the alba field in e.g . the nsai summary report is filed as an exhibit to this annual report on form 10-k . members of the nsai team have many years of industry experience , having worked for large , international oil and gas companies before joining nsai . the senior technical advisor has a bachelor of science degree in geophysics and over 15 years of experience in the estimation of and evaluation of reserves . the second member has a bachelor of science degree in chemical engineering and master of business administration along with over 3 years of experience in estimation and evaluation of reserves . both are licensed in the state of texas . ryder scott company ( "ryder scott" ) performed audits of several of our fields in 2012 and 2011 . their summary reports on audits performed in 2012 and 2011 are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead for ryder scott has over 20 years of industry experience , having worked for a major international oil and gas company before joining ryder scott . he has a bachelor of science degree in mechanical engineering , is a member of spe where he served on the oil and gas reserves committee and is a registered professional engineer in the state of texas . changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2012 , 571 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , an increase of 176 mmboe from december 31 , 2011 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2012 : ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>395</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revisions of previous estimates</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>improved recovery</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases of reserves in place</td><td>56</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>extensions discoveries and other additions</td><td>201</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>transfer to proved developed</td><td>-70 ( 70 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>end of year</td><td>571</td></tr></table> significant additions to proved undeveloped reserves during 2012 include 56 mmboe due to acquisitions in the eagle ford shale . development drilling added 124 mmboe in the eagle ford , 35 mmboe in the bakken and 15 mmboe in the oklahoma resource basins shale play . a gas sharing agreement signed with the libyan government in 2012 added 19 mmboe . additionally , 30 mmboe were transferred from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves in the eagle ford and 14 mmboe in the bakken shale plays due to producing wells . costs incurred in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 1995 million $ 1107 million and $ 1463 million . a total of 27 mmboe was booked as a result of reliable technology . technologies included statistical analysis of production performance , decline curve analysis , rate transient analysis , reservoir simulation and volumetric analysis . the statistical nature of production performance coupled with highly certain reservoir continuity or quality within the reliable technology areas and sufficient proved undeveloped locations establish the reasonable certainty criteria required for booking reserves. .
Question: what was the value of undeveloped reserves at the end of the year?
Answer: 571.0
Question: what was the value at the start of the year?
| 395.0 |
CONVFINQA5255 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
estimates of synthetic crude oil reserves are prepared by glj petroleum consultants of calgary , canada , third-party consultants . their reports for all years are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead responsible for the estimates of our osm reserves has 34 years of experience in petroleum engineering and has conducted surface mineable oil sands evaluations since 1986 . he is a member of spe , having served as regional director from 1998 through 2001 . the second team member has 13 years of experience in petroleum engineering and has conducted surface mineable oil sands evaluations since 2009 . both are registered practicing professional engineers in the province of alberta . audits of estimates third-party consultants are engaged to provide independent estimates for fields that comprise 80 percent of our total proved reserves over a rolling four-year period for the purpose of auditing the in-house reserve estimates . we met this goal for the four- year period ended december 31 , 2012 . we established a tolerance level of 10 percent such that initial estimates by the third-party consultants are accepted if they are within 10 percent of our internal estimates . should the third-party consultants 2019 initial analysis fail to reach our tolerance level , both our team and the consultants re-examine the information provided , request additional data and refine their analysis if appropriate . this resolution process is continued until both estimates are within 10 percent . in the very limited instances where differences outside the 10 percent tolerance cannot be resolved by year end , a plan to resolve the difference is developed and our senior management is informed . this process did not result in significant changes to our reserve estimates in 2012 or 2011 . there were no third-party audits performed in 2010 . during 2012 , netherland , sewell & associates , inc . ( "nsai" ) prepared a certification of december 31 , 2011 reserves for the alba field in e.g . the nsai summary report is filed as an exhibit to this annual report on form 10-k . members of the nsai team have many years of industry experience , having worked for large , international oil and gas companies before joining nsai . the senior technical advisor has a bachelor of science degree in geophysics and over 15 years of experience in the estimation of and evaluation of reserves . the second member has a bachelor of science degree in chemical engineering and master of business administration along with over 3 years of experience in estimation and evaluation of reserves . both are licensed in the state of texas . ryder scott company ( "ryder scott" ) performed audits of several of our fields in 2012 and 2011 . their summary reports on audits performed in 2012 and 2011 are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead for ryder scott has over 20 years of industry experience , having worked for a major international oil and gas company before joining ryder scott . he has a bachelor of science degree in mechanical engineering , is a member of spe where he served on the oil and gas reserves committee and is a registered professional engineer in the state of texas . changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2012 , 571 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , an increase of 176 mmboe from december 31 , 2011 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2012 : ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>395</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revisions of previous estimates</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>improved recovery</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases of reserves in place</td><td>56</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>extensions discoveries and other additions</td><td>201</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>transfer to proved developed</td><td>-70 ( 70 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>end of year</td><td>571</td></tr></table> significant additions to proved undeveloped reserves during 2012 include 56 mmboe due to acquisitions in the eagle ford shale . development drilling added 124 mmboe in the eagle ford , 35 mmboe in the bakken and 15 mmboe in the oklahoma resource basins shale play . a gas sharing agreement signed with the libyan government in 2012 added 19 mmboe . additionally , 30 mmboe were transferred from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves in the eagle ford and 14 mmboe in the bakken shale plays due to producing wells . costs incurred in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 1995 million $ 1107 million and $ 1463 million . a total of 27 mmboe was booked as a result of reliable technology . technologies included statistical analysis of production performance , decline curve analysis , rate transient analysis , reservoir simulation and volumetric analysis . the statistical nature of production performance coupled with highly certain reservoir continuity or quality within the reliable technology areas and sufficient proved undeveloped locations establish the reasonable certainty criteria required for booking reserves. .
Question: what was the value of undeveloped reserves at the end of the year?
Answer: 571.0
Question: what was the value at the start of the year?
Answer: 395.0
Question: what was the net change in value?
| 176.0 |
CONVFINQA5256 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
estimates of synthetic crude oil reserves are prepared by glj petroleum consultants of calgary , canada , third-party consultants . their reports for all years are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead responsible for the estimates of our osm reserves has 34 years of experience in petroleum engineering and has conducted surface mineable oil sands evaluations since 1986 . he is a member of spe , having served as regional director from 1998 through 2001 . the second team member has 13 years of experience in petroleum engineering and has conducted surface mineable oil sands evaluations since 2009 . both are registered practicing professional engineers in the province of alberta . audits of estimates third-party consultants are engaged to provide independent estimates for fields that comprise 80 percent of our total proved reserves over a rolling four-year period for the purpose of auditing the in-house reserve estimates . we met this goal for the four- year period ended december 31 , 2012 . we established a tolerance level of 10 percent such that initial estimates by the third-party consultants are accepted if they are within 10 percent of our internal estimates . should the third-party consultants 2019 initial analysis fail to reach our tolerance level , both our team and the consultants re-examine the information provided , request additional data and refine their analysis if appropriate . this resolution process is continued until both estimates are within 10 percent . in the very limited instances where differences outside the 10 percent tolerance cannot be resolved by year end , a plan to resolve the difference is developed and our senior management is informed . this process did not result in significant changes to our reserve estimates in 2012 or 2011 . there were no third-party audits performed in 2010 . during 2012 , netherland , sewell & associates , inc . ( "nsai" ) prepared a certification of december 31 , 2011 reserves for the alba field in e.g . the nsai summary report is filed as an exhibit to this annual report on form 10-k . members of the nsai team have many years of industry experience , having worked for large , international oil and gas companies before joining nsai . the senior technical advisor has a bachelor of science degree in geophysics and over 15 years of experience in the estimation of and evaluation of reserves . the second member has a bachelor of science degree in chemical engineering and master of business administration along with over 3 years of experience in estimation and evaluation of reserves . both are licensed in the state of texas . ryder scott company ( "ryder scott" ) performed audits of several of our fields in 2012 and 2011 . their summary reports on audits performed in 2012 and 2011 are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead for ryder scott has over 20 years of industry experience , having worked for a major international oil and gas company before joining ryder scott . he has a bachelor of science degree in mechanical engineering , is a member of spe where he served on the oil and gas reserves committee and is a registered professional engineer in the state of texas . changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2012 , 571 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , an increase of 176 mmboe from december 31 , 2011 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2012 : ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>395</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revisions of previous estimates</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>improved recovery</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases of reserves in place</td><td>56</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>extensions discoveries and other additions</td><td>201</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>transfer to proved developed</td><td>-70 ( 70 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>end of year</td><td>571</td></tr></table> significant additions to proved undeveloped reserves during 2012 include 56 mmboe due to acquisitions in the eagle ford shale . development drilling added 124 mmboe in the eagle ford , 35 mmboe in the bakken and 15 mmboe in the oklahoma resource basins shale play . a gas sharing agreement signed with the libyan government in 2012 added 19 mmboe . additionally , 30 mmboe were transferred from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves in the eagle ford and 14 mmboe in the bakken shale plays due to producing wells . costs incurred in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 1995 million $ 1107 million and $ 1463 million . a total of 27 mmboe was booked as a result of reliable technology . technologies included statistical analysis of production performance , decline curve analysis , rate transient analysis , reservoir simulation and volumetric analysis . the statistical nature of production performance coupled with highly certain reservoir continuity or quality within the reliable technology areas and sufficient proved undeveloped locations establish the reasonable certainty criteria required for booking reserves. .
Question: what was the value of undeveloped reserves at the end of the year?
Answer: 571.0
Question: what was the value at the start of the year?
Answer: 395.0
Question: what was the net change in value?
Answer: 176.0
Question: what was the value at the start of the year?
| 395.0 |
CONVFINQA5257 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
estimates of synthetic crude oil reserves are prepared by glj petroleum consultants of calgary , canada , third-party consultants . their reports for all years are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead responsible for the estimates of our osm reserves has 34 years of experience in petroleum engineering and has conducted surface mineable oil sands evaluations since 1986 . he is a member of spe , having served as regional director from 1998 through 2001 . the second team member has 13 years of experience in petroleum engineering and has conducted surface mineable oil sands evaluations since 2009 . both are registered practicing professional engineers in the province of alberta . audits of estimates third-party consultants are engaged to provide independent estimates for fields that comprise 80 percent of our total proved reserves over a rolling four-year period for the purpose of auditing the in-house reserve estimates . we met this goal for the four- year period ended december 31 , 2012 . we established a tolerance level of 10 percent such that initial estimates by the third-party consultants are accepted if they are within 10 percent of our internal estimates . should the third-party consultants 2019 initial analysis fail to reach our tolerance level , both our team and the consultants re-examine the information provided , request additional data and refine their analysis if appropriate . this resolution process is continued until both estimates are within 10 percent . in the very limited instances where differences outside the 10 percent tolerance cannot be resolved by year end , a plan to resolve the difference is developed and our senior management is informed . this process did not result in significant changes to our reserve estimates in 2012 or 2011 . there were no third-party audits performed in 2010 . during 2012 , netherland , sewell & associates , inc . ( "nsai" ) prepared a certification of december 31 , 2011 reserves for the alba field in e.g . the nsai summary report is filed as an exhibit to this annual report on form 10-k . members of the nsai team have many years of industry experience , having worked for large , international oil and gas companies before joining nsai . the senior technical advisor has a bachelor of science degree in geophysics and over 15 years of experience in the estimation of and evaluation of reserves . the second member has a bachelor of science degree in chemical engineering and master of business administration along with over 3 years of experience in estimation and evaluation of reserves . both are licensed in the state of texas . ryder scott company ( "ryder scott" ) performed audits of several of our fields in 2012 and 2011 . their summary reports on audits performed in 2012 and 2011 are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead for ryder scott has over 20 years of industry experience , having worked for a major international oil and gas company before joining ryder scott . he has a bachelor of science degree in mechanical engineering , is a member of spe where he served on the oil and gas reserves committee and is a registered professional engineer in the state of texas . changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2012 , 571 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , an increase of 176 mmboe from december 31 , 2011 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2012 : ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>395</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revisions of previous estimates</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>improved recovery</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases of reserves in place</td><td>56</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>extensions discoveries and other additions</td><td>201</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>transfer to proved developed</td><td>-70 ( 70 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>end of year</td><td>571</td></tr></table> significant additions to proved undeveloped reserves during 2012 include 56 mmboe due to acquisitions in the eagle ford shale . development drilling added 124 mmboe in the eagle ford , 35 mmboe in the bakken and 15 mmboe in the oklahoma resource basins shale play . a gas sharing agreement signed with the libyan government in 2012 added 19 mmboe . additionally , 30 mmboe were transferred from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves in the eagle ford and 14 mmboe in the bakken shale plays due to producing wells . costs incurred in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 1995 million $ 1107 million and $ 1463 million . a total of 27 mmboe was booked as a result of reliable technology . technologies included statistical analysis of production performance , decline curve analysis , rate transient analysis , reservoir simulation and volumetric analysis . the statistical nature of production performance coupled with highly certain reservoir continuity or quality within the reliable technology areas and sufficient proved undeveloped locations establish the reasonable certainty criteria required for booking reserves. .
Question: what was the value of undeveloped reserves at the end of the year?
Answer: 571.0
Question: what was the value at the start of the year?
Answer: 395.0
Question: what was the net change in value?
Answer: 176.0
Question: what was the value at the start of the year?
Answer: 395.0
Question: what was the percent change?
| 0.44557 |
CONVFINQA5258 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2 0 0 8 a n n u a l r e p o r t stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the performance of our series a common , series b common stock , and series c common stock for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 as compared with the performance of the standard and poor 2019s 500 index and a peer group index which consists of the walt disney company , time warner inc. , cbs corporation class b common stock , viacom , inc . class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , and scripps network interactive , inc . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2006 and that all subsequent dividends were reinvested in additional shares . september 18 , september 30 , december 31 , 2008 2008 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 18 2008</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>december 31 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 103.19</td><td>$ 102.53</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 105.54</td><td>$ 78.53</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 88.50</td><td>$ 83.69</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 96.54</td><td>$ 74.86</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 92.67</td><td>$ 68.79</td></tr></table> s&p 500 peer group .
Question: what was the value of discb stock on december 31, 2008?
| 78.53 |
CONVFINQA5259 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2 0 0 8 a n n u a l r e p o r t stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the performance of our series a common , series b common stock , and series c common stock for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 as compared with the performance of the standard and poor 2019s 500 index and a peer group index which consists of the walt disney company , time warner inc. , cbs corporation class b common stock , viacom , inc . class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , and scripps network interactive , inc . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2006 and that all subsequent dividends were reinvested in additional shares . september 18 , september 30 , december 31 , 2008 2008 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 18 2008</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>december 31 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 103.19</td><td>$ 102.53</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 105.54</td><td>$ 78.53</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 88.50</td><td>$ 83.69</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 96.54</td><td>$ 74.86</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 92.67</td><td>$ 68.79</td></tr></table> s&p 500 peer group .
Question: what was the value of discb stock on december 31, 2008?
Answer: 78.53
Question: what is the value of discb stock on december 31 2008 less the initial investment?
| -21.47 |
CONVFINQA5260 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
2 0 0 8 a n n u a l r e p o r t stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the performance of our series a common , series b common stock , and series c common stock for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 as compared with the performance of the standard and poor 2019s 500 index and a peer group index which consists of the walt disney company , time warner inc. , cbs corporation class b common stock , viacom , inc . class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , and scripps network interactive , inc . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2006 and that all subsequent dividends were reinvested in additional shares . september 18 , september 30 , december 31 , 2008 2008 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 18 2008</td><td>september 30 2008</td><td>december 31 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 103.19</td><td>$ 102.53</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 105.54</td><td>$ 78.53</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 88.50</td><td>$ 83.69</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 96.54</td><td>$ 74.86</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 92.67</td><td>$ 68.79</td></tr></table> s&p 500 peer group .
Question: what was the value of discb stock on december 31, 2008?
Answer: 78.53
Question: what is the value of discb stock on december 31 2008 less the initial investment?
Answer: -21.47
Question: what is the percent change?
| -0.2147 |
CONVFINQA5261 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements stock-based performance unit awards 2013 during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 we granted 754140 , 563631 and 1205517 stock- based performance unit awards to officers . at december 31 , 2018 , there were 1196176 units outstanding . total stock-based performance unit awards expense was $ 13 million in 2018 , $ 8 million in 2017 and $ 6 million in 2016 . the key assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation to determine the fair value of stock-based performance units granted in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>valuation date stock price</td><td>$ 14.17</td><td>$ 14.17</td><td>$ 14.17</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected annual dividend yield</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>39% ( 39 % )</td><td>43% ( 43 % )</td><td>52% ( 52 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.5% ( 2.5 % )</td><td>2.6% ( 2.6 % )</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value of stock-based performance units outstanding</td><td>$ 19.60</td><td>$ 19.45</td><td>$ 21.51</td></tr></table> 18 . defined benefit postretirement plans and defined contribution plan we have noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all domestic employees , as well as u.k . employees who were hired before april 2010 . certain employees located in e.g. , who are u.s . or u.k . based , also participate in these plans . benefits under these plans are based on plan provisions specific to each plan . for the u.k . pension plan , the principal employer and plan trustees reached a decision to close the plan to future benefit accruals effective december 31 , 2015 . we also have defined benefit plans for other postretirement benefits covering our u.s . employees . health care benefits are provided up to age 65 through comprehensive hospital , surgical and major medical benefit provisions subject to various cost- sharing features . post-age 65 health care benefits are provided to certain u.s . employees on a defined contribution basis . life insurance benefits are provided to certain retiree beneficiaries . these other postretirement benefits are not funded in advance . employees hired after 2016 are not eligible for any postretirement health care or life insurance benefits. .
Question: what was the total stock-based performance unit awards expense in the years of 2017 and 2018, in millions?
| 21.0 |
CONVFINQA5262 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements stock-based performance unit awards 2013 during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 we granted 754140 , 563631 and 1205517 stock- based performance unit awards to officers . at december 31 , 2018 , there were 1196176 units outstanding . total stock-based performance unit awards expense was $ 13 million in 2018 , $ 8 million in 2017 and $ 6 million in 2016 . the key assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation to determine the fair value of stock-based performance units granted in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>valuation date stock price</td><td>$ 14.17</td><td>$ 14.17</td><td>$ 14.17</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected annual dividend yield</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>39% ( 39 % )</td><td>43% ( 43 % )</td><td>52% ( 52 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.5% ( 2.5 % )</td><td>2.6% ( 2.6 % )</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value of stock-based performance units outstanding</td><td>$ 19.60</td><td>$ 19.45</td><td>$ 21.51</td></tr></table> 18 . defined benefit postretirement plans and defined contribution plan we have noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all domestic employees , as well as u.k . employees who were hired before april 2010 . certain employees located in e.g. , who are u.s . or u.k . based , also participate in these plans . benefits under these plans are based on plan provisions specific to each plan . for the u.k . pension plan , the principal employer and plan trustees reached a decision to close the plan to future benefit accruals effective december 31 , 2015 . we also have defined benefit plans for other postretirement benefits covering our u.s . employees . health care benefits are provided up to age 65 through comprehensive hospital , surgical and major medical benefit provisions subject to various cost- sharing features . post-age 65 health care benefits are provided to certain u.s . employees on a defined contribution basis . life insurance benefits are provided to certain retiree beneficiaries . these other postretirement benefits are not funded in advance . employees hired after 2016 are not eligible for any postretirement health care or life insurance benefits. .
Question: what was the total stock-based performance unit awards expense in the years of 2017 and 2018, in millions?
Answer: 21.0
Question: including the year of 2016, what would then be the total in stock-based performance unit awards expense of the three years, in millions?
| 27.0 |
CONVFINQA5263 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income decreased $ 7.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate , lower other income , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , substantially offset by higher net revenue , lower depreciation and amortization expenses , and lower interest expense . 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 105.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , higher other income , and lower depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 1216.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>31.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>ano decommissioning trust</td><td>26.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>13.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-15.9 ( 15.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-11.9 ( 11.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>capacity acquisition recovery</td><td>-10.3 ( 10.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>3.2</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2011 net revenue</td><td>$ 1252.3</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a base rate increase effective july 2010 . see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the rate case settlement . the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment . the gains resulted in an increase in 2010 in interest and investment income and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income. .
Question: what was the net revenue in 2011?
| 1252.3 |
CONVFINQA5264 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income decreased $ 7.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate , lower other income , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , substantially offset by higher net revenue , lower depreciation and amortization expenses , and lower interest expense . 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 105.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , higher other income , and lower depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 1216.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>31.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>ano decommissioning trust</td><td>26.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>13.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-15.9 ( 15.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-11.9 ( 11.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>capacity acquisition recovery</td><td>-10.3 ( 10.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>3.2</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2011 net revenue</td><td>$ 1252.3</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a base rate increase effective july 2010 . see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the rate case settlement . the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment . the gains resulted in an increase in 2010 in interest and investment income and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income. .
Question: what was the net revenue in 2011?
Answer: 1252.3
Question: and what was it in 2010?
| 1216.7 |
CONVFINQA5265 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income decreased $ 7.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate , lower other income , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , substantially offset by higher net revenue , lower depreciation and amortization expenses , and lower interest expense . 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 105.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , higher other income , and lower depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 1216.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>31.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>ano decommissioning trust</td><td>26.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>13.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-15.9 ( 15.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-11.9 ( 11.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>capacity acquisition recovery</td><td>-10.3 ( 10.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>3.2</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2011 net revenue</td><td>$ 1252.3</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a base rate increase effective july 2010 . see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the rate case settlement . the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment . the gains resulted in an increase in 2010 in interest and investment income and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income. .
Question: what was the net revenue in 2011?
Answer: 1252.3
Question: and what was it in 2010?
Answer: 1216.7
Question: what was, then, the change in net revenue over the year?
| 35.6 |
CONVFINQA5266 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income decreased $ 7.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate , lower other income , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , substantially offset by higher net revenue , lower depreciation and amortization expenses , and lower interest expense . 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 105.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , higher other income , and lower depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 1216.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>31.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>ano decommissioning trust</td><td>26.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>13.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-15.9 ( 15.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-11.9 ( 11.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>capacity acquisition recovery</td><td>-10.3 ( 10.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>3.2</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2011 net revenue</td><td>$ 1252.3</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a base rate increase effective july 2010 . see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the rate case settlement . the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment . the gains resulted in an increase in 2010 in interest and investment income and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income. .
Question: what was the net revenue in 2011?
Answer: 1252.3
Question: and what was it in 2010?
Answer: 1216.7
Question: what was, then, the change in net revenue over the year?
Answer: 35.6
Question: and what percentage of this change is due to the retail electric price?
| 0.87079 |
CONVFINQA5267 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 103.84</td><td>$ 152.16</td><td>$ 165.35</td><td>$ 154.61</td><td>$ 189.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.99</td><td>$ 153.54</td><td>$ 174.54</td><td>$ 176.94</td><td>$ 198.09</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 107.49</td><td>$ 151.97</td><td>$ 190.07</td><td>$ 158.22</td><td>$ 192.80</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in the value of united parcel service inc ., considering its value in 2016 and the original amount invested in it in 2011?
| 89.72 |
CONVFINQA5268 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 103.84</td><td>$ 152.16</td><td>$ 165.35</td><td>$ 154.61</td><td>$ 189.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.99</td><td>$ 153.54</td><td>$ 174.54</td><td>$ 176.94</td><td>$ 198.09</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 107.49</td><td>$ 151.97</td><td>$ 190.07</td><td>$ 158.22</td><td>$ 192.80</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in the value of united parcel service inc ., considering its value in 2016 and the original amount invested in it in 2011?
Answer: 89.72
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to this original amount, in percentage?
| 0.8972 |
CONVFINQA5269 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
business-related metrics as of or for the year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in billions except ratios )</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loan and lease receivables</td><td>$ 43.2</td><td>$ 37.4</td><td>16% ( 16 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average loan and lease receivables</td><td>41.7</td><td>31.7</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>automobile origination volume</td><td>27.8</td><td>25.3</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>automobile market share</td><td>6.1% ( 6.1 % )</td><td>5.7% ( 5.7 % )</td><td>40bp</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>30+ day delinquency rate</td><td>1.46</td><td>1.54</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net charge-off ratio</td><td>0.41</td><td>0.51</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>overhead ratio</td><td>35</td><td>36</td><td>-100 ( 100 )</td></tr></table> crb is the no . 1 bank in the new york tri-state area and a top five bank in texas ( both ranked by retail deposits ) , providing payment , liquidity , investment , insurance and credit products and services to three primary customer segments : small busi- ness , affluent and retail . within these segments , crb serves 326000 small businesses , 433000 affluent consumers and 2.6 million mass-market consumers . crb 2019s continued focus on expanding customer relationships resulted in a 14% ( 14 % ) increase in core deposits ( for this purpose , core deposits are total deposits less time deposits ) from december 31 , 2002 , and a 77% ( 77 % ) increase in the cross-sell of chase credit products over 2002 . in 2003 , mortgage and home equity originations through crb 2019s distribution channels were $ 3.4 billion and $ 4.7 billion , respectively . branch-originated credit cards totaled 77000 , contributing to 23% ( 23 % ) of crb customers holding chase credit cards . crb is compensated by cfs 2019s credit businesses for the home finance and credit card loans it origi- nates and does not retain these balances . chase regional banking while crb continues to position itself for growth , decreased deposit spreads related to the low-rate environment and increased credit costs resulted in an 80% ( 80 % ) decline in crb operating earnings from 2002 . this decrease was partly offset by an 8% ( 8 % ) increase in total average deposits . operating revenue of $ 2.6 billion decreased by 9% ( 9 % ) compared with 2002 . net interest income declined by 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 1.7 billion , primarily attributable to the lower interest rate environment . noninterest revenue decreased 6% ( 6 % ) to $ 927 million due to lower deposit service fees , decreased debit card fees and one-time gains in 2002 . crb 2019s revenue does not include funding profits earned on its deposit base ; these amounts are included in the results of global treasury . operating expense of $ 2.4 billion increased by 7% ( 7 % ) from 2002 . the increase was primarily due to investments in technology within the branch network ; also contributing were higher compensation expenses related to increased staff levels and higher severance costs as a result of continued restructuring . this increase in operating caf is the largest u.s . bank originator of automobile loans and leases , with more than 2.9 million accounts . in 2003 , caf had a record number of automobile loan and lease originations , growing by 10% ( 10 % ) over 2002 to $ 27.8 billion . loan and lease receivables of $ 43.2 billion at december 31 , 2003 , were 16% ( 16 % ) higher than at the prior year-end . despite a challenging operating environment reflecting slightly declining new car sales in 2003 and increased competition , caf 2019s market share among automobile finance companies improved to 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) in 2003 from 5.7% ( 5.7 % ) in 2002 . the increase in market share was the result of strong organic growth and an origination strategy that allies the business with manufac- turers and dealers . caf 2019s relationships with several major car manufacturers contributed to 2003 growth , as did caf 2019s dealer relationships , which increased from approximately 12700 dealers in 2002 to approximately 13700 dealers in 2003 . in 2003 , operating earnings were $ 205 million , 23% ( 23 % ) higher compared with 2002 . the increase in earnings was driven by continued revenue growth and improved operating efficiency . in 2003 , caf 2019s operating revenue grew by 23% ( 23 % ) to $ 842 million . net interest income grew by 33% ( 33 % ) compared with 2002 . the increase was driven by strong operating performance due to higher average loans and leases outstanding , reflecting continued strong origination volume and lower funding costs . operating expense of $ 292 million increased by 18% ( 18 % ) compared with 2002 . the increase in expenses was driven by higher average chase auto finance loans outstanding , higher origination volume and higher perform- ance-based incentives . caf 2019s overhead ratio improved from 36% ( 36 % ) in 2002 to 35% ( 35 % ) in 2003 , as a result of strong revenue growth , con- tinued productivity gains and disciplined expense management . credit costs increased 18% ( 18 % ) to $ 205 million , primarily reflecting a 32% ( 32 % ) increase in average loan and lease receivables . credit quality continued to be strong relative to 2002 , as evidenced by a lower net charge-off ratio and 30+ day delinquency rate . caf also comprises chase education finance , a top provider of government-guaranteed and private loans for higher education . loans are provided through a joint venture with sallie mae , a government-sponsored enterprise and the leader in funding and servicing education loans . chase education finance 2019s origination volume totaled $ 2.7 billion , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) from last year . management 2019s discussion and analysis j.p . morgan chase & co . 42 j.p . morgan chase & co . / 2003 annual report .
Question: what was the change in 30+ day delinquency rate, as a percentage?
| 0.08 |
CONVFINQA5270 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
business-related metrics as of or for the year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in billions except ratios )</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loan and lease receivables</td><td>$ 43.2</td><td>$ 37.4</td><td>16% ( 16 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average loan and lease receivables</td><td>41.7</td><td>31.7</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>automobile origination volume</td><td>27.8</td><td>25.3</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>automobile market share</td><td>6.1% ( 6.1 % )</td><td>5.7% ( 5.7 % )</td><td>40bp</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>30+ day delinquency rate</td><td>1.46</td><td>1.54</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net charge-off ratio</td><td>0.41</td><td>0.51</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>overhead ratio</td><td>35</td><td>36</td><td>-100 ( 100 )</td></tr></table> crb is the no . 1 bank in the new york tri-state area and a top five bank in texas ( both ranked by retail deposits ) , providing payment , liquidity , investment , insurance and credit products and services to three primary customer segments : small busi- ness , affluent and retail . within these segments , crb serves 326000 small businesses , 433000 affluent consumers and 2.6 million mass-market consumers . crb 2019s continued focus on expanding customer relationships resulted in a 14% ( 14 % ) increase in core deposits ( for this purpose , core deposits are total deposits less time deposits ) from december 31 , 2002 , and a 77% ( 77 % ) increase in the cross-sell of chase credit products over 2002 . in 2003 , mortgage and home equity originations through crb 2019s distribution channels were $ 3.4 billion and $ 4.7 billion , respectively . branch-originated credit cards totaled 77000 , contributing to 23% ( 23 % ) of crb customers holding chase credit cards . crb is compensated by cfs 2019s credit businesses for the home finance and credit card loans it origi- nates and does not retain these balances . chase regional banking while crb continues to position itself for growth , decreased deposit spreads related to the low-rate environment and increased credit costs resulted in an 80% ( 80 % ) decline in crb operating earnings from 2002 . this decrease was partly offset by an 8% ( 8 % ) increase in total average deposits . operating revenue of $ 2.6 billion decreased by 9% ( 9 % ) compared with 2002 . net interest income declined by 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 1.7 billion , primarily attributable to the lower interest rate environment . noninterest revenue decreased 6% ( 6 % ) to $ 927 million due to lower deposit service fees , decreased debit card fees and one-time gains in 2002 . crb 2019s revenue does not include funding profits earned on its deposit base ; these amounts are included in the results of global treasury . operating expense of $ 2.4 billion increased by 7% ( 7 % ) from 2002 . the increase was primarily due to investments in technology within the branch network ; also contributing were higher compensation expenses related to increased staff levels and higher severance costs as a result of continued restructuring . this increase in operating caf is the largest u.s . bank originator of automobile loans and leases , with more than 2.9 million accounts . in 2003 , caf had a record number of automobile loan and lease originations , growing by 10% ( 10 % ) over 2002 to $ 27.8 billion . loan and lease receivables of $ 43.2 billion at december 31 , 2003 , were 16% ( 16 % ) higher than at the prior year-end . despite a challenging operating environment reflecting slightly declining new car sales in 2003 and increased competition , caf 2019s market share among automobile finance companies improved to 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) in 2003 from 5.7% ( 5.7 % ) in 2002 . the increase in market share was the result of strong organic growth and an origination strategy that allies the business with manufac- turers and dealers . caf 2019s relationships with several major car manufacturers contributed to 2003 growth , as did caf 2019s dealer relationships , which increased from approximately 12700 dealers in 2002 to approximately 13700 dealers in 2003 . in 2003 , operating earnings were $ 205 million , 23% ( 23 % ) higher compared with 2002 . the increase in earnings was driven by continued revenue growth and improved operating efficiency . in 2003 , caf 2019s operating revenue grew by 23% ( 23 % ) to $ 842 million . net interest income grew by 33% ( 33 % ) compared with 2002 . the increase was driven by strong operating performance due to higher average loans and leases outstanding , reflecting continued strong origination volume and lower funding costs . operating expense of $ 292 million increased by 18% ( 18 % ) compared with 2002 . the increase in expenses was driven by higher average chase auto finance loans outstanding , higher origination volume and higher perform- ance-based incentives . caf 2019s overhead ratio improved from 36% ( 36 % ) in 2002 to 35% ( 35 % ) in 2003 , as a result of strong revenue growth , con- tinued productivity gains and disciplined expense management . credit costs increased 18% ( 18 % ) to $ 205 million , primarily reflecting a 32% ( 32 % ) increase in average loan and lease receivables . credit quality continued to be strong relative to 2002 , as evidenced by a lower net charge-off ratio and 30+ day delinquency rate . caf also comprises chase education finance , a top provider of government-guaranteed and private loans for higher education . loans are provided through a joint venture with sallie mae , a government-sponsored enterprise and the leader in funding and servicing education loans . chase education finance 2019s origination volume totaled $ 2.7 billion , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) from last year . management 2019s discussion and analysis j.p . morgan chase & co . 42 j.p . morgan chase & co . / 2003 annual report .
Question: what was the change in 30+ day delinquency rate, as a percentage?
Answer: 0.08
Question: when applied to the 2002 values, by how much did this rate improve in 2003?
| 0.1232 |
CONVFINQA5271 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company endeavors to actively engage with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing four sip agreements , one of which was executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to execute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders . everest re 2019s book of assumed a&e reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a limited number of contracts and for a limited period , from 1974 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeliness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>case reserves reported by ceding companies</td><td>$ 138.4</td><td>$ 145.6</td><td>$ 135.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )</td><td>90.6</td><td>102.9</td><td>116.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )</td><td>36.7</td><td>40.6</td><td>38.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>incurred but not reported reserves</td><td>177.1</td><td>210.9</td><td>264.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gross reserves</td><td>442.8</td><td>499.9</td><td>554.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reinsurance receivable</td><td>-17.1 ( 17.1 )</td><td>-19.8 ( 19.8 )</td><td>-21.9 ( 21.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net reserves</td><td>$ 425.7</td><td>$ 480.2</td><td>$ 532.9</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves established by the company in excess of those reported by the ceding company , based on the company 2019s assessment of the covered loss . ( some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding. ) additional losses , including those relating to latent injuries and other exposures , which are as yet unrecognized , the type or magnitude of which cannot be foreseen by either the company or the industry , may emerge in the future . such future emergence could have material adverse effects on the company 2019s future financial condition , results of operations and cash flows. .
Question: what was the value of gross reserves in 2012?
| 442.8 |
CONVFINQA5272 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company endeavors to actively engage with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing four sip agreements , one of which was executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to execute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders . everest re 2019s book of assumed a&e reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a limited number of contracts and for a limited period , from 1974 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeliness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>case reserves reported by ceding companies</td><td>$ 138.4</td><td>$ 145.6</td><td>$ 135.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )</td><td>90.6</td><td>102.9</td><td>116.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )</td><td>36.7</td><td>40.6</td><td>38.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>incurred but not reported reserves</td><td>177.1</td><td>210.9</td><td>264.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gross reserves</td><td>442.8</td><td>499.9</td><td>554.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reinsurance receivable</td><td>-17.1 ( 17.1 )</td><td>-19.8 ( 19.8 )</td><td>-21.9 ( 21.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net reserves</td><td>$ 425.7</td><td>$ 480.2</td><td>$ 532.9</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves established by the company in excess of those reported by the ceding company , based on the company 2019s assessment of the covered loss . ( some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding. ) additional losses , including those relating to latent injuries and other exposures , which are as yet unrecognized , the type or magnitude of which cannot be foreseen by either the company or the industry , may emerge in the future . such future emergence could have material adverse effects on the company 2019s future financial condition , results of operations and cash flows. .
Question: what was the value of gross reserves in 2012?
Answer: 442.8
Question: what was the value of gross reserves in 2011?
| 499.9 |
CONVFINQA5273 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company endeavors to actively engage with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing four sip agreements , one of which was executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to execute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders . everest re 2019s book of assumed a&e reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a limited number of contracts and for a limited period , from 1974 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeliness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>case reserves reported by ceding companies</td><td>$ 138.4</td><td>$ 145.6</td><td>$ 135.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )</td><td>90.6</td><td>102.9</td><td>116.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )</td><td>36.7</td><td>40.6</td><td>38.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>incurred but not reported reserves</td><td>177.1</td><td>210.9</td><td>264.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gross reserves</td><td>442.8</td><td>499.9</td><td>554.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reinsurance receivable</td><td>-17.1 ( 17.1 )</td><td>-19.8 ( 19.8 )</td><td>-21.9 ( 21.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net reserves</td><td>$ 425.7</td><td>$ 480.2</td><td>$ 532.9</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves established by the company in excess of those reported by the ceding company , based on the company 2019s assessment of the covered loss . ( some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding. ) additional losses , including those relating to latent injuries and other exposures , which are as yet unrecognized , the type or magnitude of which cannot be foreseen by either the company or the industry , may emerge in the future . such future emergence could have material adverse effects on the company 2019s future financial condition , results of operations and cash flows. .
Question: what was the value of gross reserves in 2012?
Answer: 442.8
Question: what was the value of gross reserves in 2011?
Answer: 499.9
Question: what is the change in value?
| -57.1 |
CONVFINQA5274 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company endeavors to actively engage with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing four sip agreements , one of which was executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to execute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders . everest re 2019s book of assumed a&e reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a limited number of contracts and for a limited period , from 1974 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeliness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>case reserves reported by ceding companies</td><td>$ 138.4</td><td>$ 145.6</td><td>$ 135.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )</td><td>90.6</td><td>102.9</td><td>116.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )</td><td>36.7</td><td>40.6</td><td>38.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>incurred but not reported reserves</td><td>177.1</td><td>210.9</td><td>264.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gross reserves</td><td>442.8</td><td>499.9</td><td>554.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reinsurance receivable</td><td>-17.1 ( 17.1 )</td><td>-19.8 ( 19.8 )</td><td>-21.9 ( 21.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net reserves</td><td>$ 425.7</td><td>$ 480.2</td><td>$ 532.9</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves established by the company in excess of those reported by the ceding company , based on the company 2019s assessment of the covered loss . ( some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding. ) additional losses , including those relating to latent injuries and other exposures , which are as yet unrecognized , the type or magnitude of which cannot be foreseen by either the company or the industry , may emerge in the future . such future emergence could have material adverse effects on the company 2019s future financial condition , results of operations and cash flows. .
Question: what was the value of gross reserves in 2012?
Answer: 442.8
Question: what was the value of gross reserves in 2011?
Answer: 499.9
Question: what is the change in value?
Answer: -57.1
Question: what was the value of gross reserves in 2011?
| 499.9 |
CONVFINQA5275 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company endeavors to actively engage with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing four sip agreements , one of which was executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to execute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders . everest re 2019s book of assumed a&e reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a limited number of contracts and for a limited period , from 1974 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeliness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>case reserves reported by ceding companies</td><td>$ 138.4</td><td>$ 145.6</td><td>$ 135.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )</td><td>90.6</td><td>102.9</td><td>116.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )</td><td>36.7</td><td>40.6</td><td>38.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>incurred but not reported reserves</td><td>177.1</td><td>210.9</td><td>264.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gross reserves</td><td>442.8</td><td>499.9</td><td>554.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reinsurance receivable</td><td>-17.1 ( 17.1 )</td><td>-19.8 ( 19.8 )</td><td>-21.9 ( 21.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net reserves</td><td>$ 425.7</td><td>$ 480.2</td><td>$ 532.9</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves established by the company in excess of those reported by the ceding company , based on the company 2019s assessment of the covered loss . ( some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding. ) additional losses , including those relating to latent injuries and other exposures , which are as yet unrecognized , the type or magnitude of which cannot be foreseen by either the company or the industry , may emerge in the future . such future emergence could have material adverse effects on the company 2019s future financial condition , results of operations and cash flows. .
Question: what was the value of gross reserves in 2012?
Answer: 442.8
Question: what was the value of gross reserves in 2011?
Answer: 499.9
Question: what is the change in value?
Answer: -57.1
Question: what was the value of gross reserves in 2011?
Answer: 499.9
Question: what is the percent change?
| -0.11422 |
CONVFINQA5276 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at october 1 2010</td><td>$ 19900</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increases based on positions related to prior years</td><td>935</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases based on positions related to current year</td><td>11334</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>decreases relating to lapses of applicable statutes of limitations</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at september 30 2011</td><td>$ 32136</td></tr></table> the company 2019s major tax jurisdictions as of september 30 , 2011 are the united states , california , iowa , singapore and canada . for the united states , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 1998 due to the carry forward of tax attributes . for california and iowa , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2002 due to the carry forward of tax attributes . for singapore , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2011 . for canada , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2004 . during the year ended september 30 , 2011 , the company did not recognize any significant amount of previously unrecognized tax benefits related to the expiration of the statute of limitations . the company 2019s policy is to recognize accrued interest and penalties , if incurred , on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense . the company recognized $ 0.5 million of accrued interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits during fiscal year 2011 . 11 . stockholders 2019 equity common stock at september 30 , 2011 , the company is authorized to issue 525000000 shares of common stock , par value $ 0.25 per share of which 195407396 shares are issued and 186386197 shares outstanding . holders of the company 2019s common stock are entitled to such dividends as may be declared by the company 2019s board of directors out of funds legally available for such purpose . dividends may not be paid on common stock unless all accrued dividends on preferred stock , if any , have been paid or declared and set aside . in the event of the company 2019s liquidation , dissolution or winding up , the holders of common stock will be entitled to share pro rata in the assets remaining after payment to creditors and after payment of the liquidation preference plus any unpaid dividends to holders of any outstanding preferred stock . each holder of the company 2019s common stock is entitled to one vote for each such share outstanding in the holder 2019s name . no holder of common stock is entitled to cumulate votes in voting for directors . the company 2019s second amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that , unless otherwise determined by the company 2019s board of directors , no holder of common stock has any preemptive right to purchase or subscribe for any stock of any class which the company may issue or sell . on august 3 , 2010 , the board of directors approved a stock repurchase program , pursuant to which the company is authorized to repurchase up to $ 200.0 million of the company 2019s common stock from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements . during the fiscal year ended september 30 , 2011 , the company paid approximately $ 70.0 million ( including commissions ) in connection with the repurchase of 2768045 shares of its common stock ( paying an average price of $ 25.30 per share ) . as of september 30 , 2011 , $ 130.0 million remained available under the existing share repurchase program . page 110 skyworks / annual report 2011 .
Question: what was the balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of september 30, 2011?
| 32136.0 |
CONVFINQA5277 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at october 1 2010</td><td>$ 19900</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increases based on positions related to prior years</td><td>935</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases based on positions related to current year</td><td>11334</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>decreases relating to lapses of applicable statutes of limitations</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at september 30 2011</td><td>$ 32136</td></tr></table> the company 2019s major tax jurisdictions as of september 30 , 2011 are the united states , california , iowa , singapore and canada . for the united states , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 1998 due to the carry forward of tax attributes . for california and iowa , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2002 due to the carry forward of tax attributes . for singapore , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2011 . for canada , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2004 . during the year ended september 30 , 2011 , the company did not recognize any significant amount of previously unrecognized tax benefits related to the expiration of the statute of limitations . the company 2019s policy is to recognize accrued interest and penalties , if incurred , on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense . the company recognized $ 0.5 million of accrued interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits during fiscal year 2011 . 11 . stockholders 2019 equity common stock at september 30 , 2011 , the company is authorized to issue 525000000 shares of common stock , par value $ 0.25 per share of which 195407396 shares are issued and 186386197 shares outstanding . holders of the company 2019s common stock are entitled to such dividends as may be declared by the company 2019s board of directors out of funds legally available for such purpose . dividends may not be paid on common stock unless all accrued dividends on preferred stock , if any , have been paid or declared and set aside . in the event of the company 2019s liquidation , dissolution or winding up , the holders of common stock will be entitled to share pro rata in the assets remaining after payment to creditors and after payment of the liquidation preference plus any unpaid dividends to holders of any outstanding preferred stock . each holder of the company 2019s common stock is entitled to one vote for each such share outstanding in the holder 2019s name . no holder of common stock is entitled to cumulate votes in voting for directors . the company 2019s second amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that , unless otherwise determined by the company 2019s board of directors , no holder of common stock has any preemptive right to purchase or subscribe for any stock of any class which the company may issue or sell . on august 3 , 2010 , the board of directors approved a stock repurchase program , pursuant to which the company is authorized to repurchase up to $ 200.0 million of the company 2019s common stock from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements . during the fiscal year ended september 30 , 2011 , the company paid approximately $ 70.0 million ( including commissions ) in connection with the repurchase of 2768045 shares of its common stock ( paying an average price of $ 25.30 per share ) . as of september 30 , 2011 , $ 130.0 million remained available under the existing share repurchase program . page 110 skyworks / annual report 2011 .
Question: what was the balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of september 30, 2011?
Answer: 32136.0
Question: what was the balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of october 1, 2010?
| 19900.0 |
CONVFINQA5278 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at october 1 2010</td><td>$ 19900</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increases based on positions related to prior years</td><td>935</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases based on positions related to current year</td><td>11334</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>decreases relating to lapses of applicable statutes of limitations</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at september 30 2011</td><td>$ 32136</td></tr></table> the company 2019s major tax jurisdictions as of september 30 , 2011 are the united states , california , iowa , singapore and canada . for the united states , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 1998 due to the carry forward of tax attributes . for california and iowa , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2002 due to the carry forward of tax attributes . for singapore , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2011 . for canada , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2004 . during the year ended september 30 , 2011 , the company did not recognize any significant amount of previously unrecognized tax benefits related to the expiration of the statute of limitations . the company 2019s policy is to recognize accrued interest and penalties , if incurred , on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense . the company recognized $ 0.5 million of accrued interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits during fiscal year 2011 . 11 . stockholders 2019 equity common stock at september 30 , 2011 , the company is authorized to issue 525000000 shares of common stock , par value $ 0.25 per share of which 195407396 shares are issued and 186386197 shares outstanding . holders of the company 2019s common stock are entitled to such dividends as may be declared by the company 2019s board of directors out of funds legally available for such purpose . dividends may not be paid on common stock unless all accrued dividends on preferred stock , if any , have been paid or declared and set aside . in the event of the company 2019s liquidation , dissolution or winding up , the holders of common stock will be entitled to share pro rata in the assets remaining after payment to creditors and after payment of the liquidation preference plus any unpaid dividends to holders of any outstanding preferred stock . each holder of the company 2019s common stock is entitled to one vote for each such share outstanding in the holder 2019s name . no holder of common stock is entitled to cumulate votes in voting for directors . the company 2019s second amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that , unless otherwise determined by the company 2019s board of directors , no holder of common stock has any preemptive right to purchase or subscribe for any stock of any class which the company may issue or sell . on august 3 , 2010 , the board of directors approved a stock repurchase program , pursuant to which the company is authorized to repurchase up to $ 200.0 million of the company 2019s common stock from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements . during the fiscal year ended september 30 , 2011 , the company paid approximately $ 70.0 million ( including commissions ) in connection with the repurchase of 2768045 shares of its common stock ( paying an average price of $ 25.30 per share ) . as of september 30 , 2011 , $ 130.0 million remained available under the existing share repurchase program . page 110 skyworks / annual report 2011 .
Question: what was the balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of september 30, 2011?
Answer: 32136.0
Question: what was the balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of october 1, 2010?
Answer: 19900.0
Question: what is the net change?
| 12236.0 |
CONVFINQA5279 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at october 1 2010</td><td>$ 19900</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increases based on positions related to prior years</td><td>935</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases based on positions related to current year</td><td>11334</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>decreases relating to lapses of applicable statutes of limitations</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at september 30 2011</td><td>$ 32136</td></tr></table> the company 2019s major tax jurisdictions as of september 30 , 2011 are the united states , california , iowa , singapore and canada . for the united states , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 1998 due to the carry forward of tax attributes . for california and iowa , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2002 due to the carry forward of tax attributes . for singapore , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2011 . for canada , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2004 . during the year ended september 30 , 2011 , the company did not recognize any significant amount of previously unrecognized tax benefits related to the expiration of the statute of limitations . the company 2019s policy is to recognize accrued interest and penalties , if incurred , on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense . the company recognized $ 0.5 million of accrued interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits during fiscal year 2011 . 11 . stockholders 2019 equity common stock at september 30 , 2011 , the company is authorized to issue 525000000 shares of common stock , par value $ 0.25 per share of which 195407396 shares are issued and 186386197 shares outstanding . holders of the company 2019s common stock are entitled to such dividends as may be declared by the company 2019s board of directors out of funds legally available for such purpose . dividends may not be paid on common stock unless all accrued dividends on preferred stock , if any , have been paid or declared and set aside . in the event of the company 2019s liquidation , dissolution or winding up , the holders of common stock will be entitled to share pro rata in the assets remaining after payment to creditors and after payment of the liquidation preference plus any unpaid dividends to holders of any outstanding preferred stock . each holder of the company 2019s common stock is entitled to one vote for each such share outstanding in the holder 2019s name . no holder of common stock is entitled to cumulate votes in voting for directors . the company 2019s second amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that , unless otherwise determined by the company 2019s board of directors , no holder of common stock has any preemptive right to purchase or subscribe for any stock of any class which the company may issue or sell . on august 3 , 2010 , the board of directors approved a stock repurchase program , pursuant to which the company is authorized to repurchase up to $ 200.0 million of the company 2019s common stock from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements . during the fiscal year ended september 30 , 2011 , the company paid approximately $ 70.0 million ( including commissions ) in connection with the repurchase of 2768045 shares of its common stock ( paying an average price of $ 25.30 per share ) . as of september 30 , 2011 , $ 130.0 million remained available under the existing share repurchase program . page 110 skyworks / annual report 2011 .
Question: what was the balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of september 30, 2011?
Answer: 32136.0
Question: what was the balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of october 1, 2010?
Answer: 19900.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 12236.0
Question: what is percent change for the year?
| 0.61487 |
CONVFINQA5280 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/02</td><td>12/31/03</td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 119.89</td><td>$ 139.55</td><td>$ 124.88</td><td>$ 127.08</td><td>$ 122.64</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 128.68</td><td>$ 142.68</td><td>$ 149.69</td><td>$ 173.33</td><td>$ 182.85</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 131.84</td><td>$ 168.39</td><td>$ 188.00</td><td>$ 206.46</td><td>$ 209.40</td></tr></table> securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .
Question: what was the value of the united parcel service inc . in 2007?
| 122.64 |
CONVFINQA5281 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/02</td><td>12/31/03</td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 119.89</td><td>$ 139.55</td><td>$ 124.88</td><td>$ 127.08</td><td>$ 122.64</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 128.68</td><td>$ 142.68</td><td>$ 149.69</td><td>$ 173.33</td><td>$ 182.85</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 131.84</td><td>$ 168.39</td><td>$ 188.00</td><td>$ 206.46</td><td>$ 209.40</td></tr></table> securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .
Question: what was the value of the united parcel service inc . in 2007?
Answer: 122.64
Question: what was, then, the change in its value, considering this 2007 one and the original amount invested in that stock in 2002?
| 22.64 |
CONVFINQA5282 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/02</td><td>12/31/03</td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 119.89</td><td>$ 139.55</td><td>$ 124.88</td><td>$ 127.08</td><td>$ 122.64</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 128.68</td><td>$ 142.68</td><td>$ 149.69</td><td>$ 173.33</td><td>$ 182.85</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 131.84</td><td>$ 168.39</td><td>$ 188.00</td><td>$ 206.46</td><td>$ 209.40</td></tr></table> securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .
Question: what was the value of the united parcel service inc . in 2007?
Answer: 122.64
Question: what was, then, the change in its value, considering this 2007 one and the original amount invested in that stock in 2002?
Answer: 22.64
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to this original amount, in percentage?
| 0.2264 |
CONVFINQA5283 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
sources and uses of cash ( in millions ) in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 29 , dec 30 , dec 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended ( in millions )</td><td>dec 292018</td><td>dec 302017</td><td>dec 312016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 29432</td><td>$ 22110</td><td>$ 21808</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-11239 ( 11239 )</td><td>-15762 ( 15762 )</td><td>-25817 ( 25817 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>-18607 ( 18607 )</td><td>-8475 ( 8475 )</td><td>-5739 ( 5739 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -414 ( 414 )</td><td>$ -2127 ( 2127 )</td><td>$ -9748 ( 9748 )</td></tr></table> md&a consolidated results and analysis 40 .
Question: what was the change in net cash provided by operating activities between 2016 and 2017?
| 302.0 |
CONVFINQA5284 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
sources and uses of cash ( in millions ) in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 29 , dec 30 , dec 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended ( in millions )</td><td>dec 292018</td><td>dec 302017</td><td>dec 312016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 29432</td><td>$ 22110</td><td>$ 21808</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-11239 ( 11239 )</td><td>-15762 ( 15762 )</td><td>-25817 ( 25817 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>-18607 ( 18607 )</td><td>-8475 ( 8475 )</td><td>-5739 ( 5739 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -414 ( 414 )</td><td>$ -2127 ( 2127 )</td><td>$ -9748 ( 9748 )</td></tr></table> md&a consolidated results and analysis 40 .
Question: what was the change in net cash provided by operating activities between 2016 and 2017?
Answer: 302.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent from 2016?
| 0.01385 |
CONVFINQA5285 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
citigroup 2019s repurchases are primarily from government sponsored entities . the specific representations and warranties made by the company depend on the nature of the transaction and the requirements of the buyer . market conditions and credit-ratings agency requirements may also affect representations and warranties and the other provisions the company may agree to in loan sales . in the event of a breach of the representations and warranties , the company may be required to either repurchase the mortgage loans ( generally at unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest ) with the identified defects or indemnify ( 201cmake-whole 201d ) the investor or insurer . the company has recorded a repurchase reserve that is included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet . in the case of a repurchase , the company will bear any subsequent credit loss on the mortgage loans . the company 2019s representations and warranties are generally not subject to stated limits in amount or time of coverage . however , contractual liability arises only when the representations and warranties are breached and generally only when a loss results from the breach . in the case of a repurchase , the loan is typically considered a credit- impaired loan and accounted for under sop 03-3 , 201caccounting for certain loans and debt securities , acquired in a transfer 201d ( now incorporated into asc 310-30 , receivables 2014loans and debt securities acquired with deteriorated credit quality ) . these repurchases have not had a material impact on nonperforming loan statistics , because credit-impaired purchased sop 03-3 loans are not included in nonaccrual loans . the company estimates its exposure to losses from its obligation to repurchase previously sold loans based on the probability of repurchase or make-whole and an estimated loss given repurchase or make-whole . this estimate is calculated separately by sales vintage ( i.e. , the year the loans were sold ) based on a combination of historical trends and forecasted repurchases and losses considering the : ( 1 ) trends in requests by investors for loan documentation packages to be reviewed ; ( 2 ) trends in recent repurchases and make-wholes ; ( 3 ) historical percentage of claims made as a percentage of loan documentation package requests ; ( 4 ) success rate in appealing claims ; ( 5 ) inventory of unresolved claims ; and ( 6 ) estimated loss given repurchase or make-whole , including the loss of principal , accrued interest , and foreclosure costs . the company does not change its estimation methodology by counterparty , but the historical experience and trends are considered when evaluating the overall reserve . the request for loan documentation packages is an early indicator of a potential claim . during 2009 , loan documentation package requests and the level of outstanding claims increased . in addition , our loss severity estimates increased during 2009 due to the impact of macroeconomic factors and recent experience . these factors contributed to a $ 493 million change in estimate for this reserve in 2009 . as indicated above , the repurchase reserve is calculated by sales vintage . the majority of the repurchases in 2009 were from the 2006 and 2007 sales vintages , which also represent the vintages with the largest loss- given-repurchase . an insignificant percentage of 2009 repurchases were from vintages prior to 2006 , and this is expected to decrease , because those vintages are later in the credit cycle . although early in the credit cycle , the company has experienced improved repurchase and loss-given-repurchase statistics from the 2008 and 2009 vintages . in the case of a repurchase of a credit-impaired sop 03-3 loan ( now incorporated into asc 310-30 ) , the difference between the loan 2019s fair value and unpaid principal balance at the time of the repurchase is recorded as a utilization of the repurchase reserve . payments to make the investor whole are also treated as utilizations and charged directly against the reserve . the provision for estimated probable losses arising from loan sales is recorded as an adjustment to the gain on sale , which is included in other revenue in the consolidated statement of income . a liability for representations and warranties is estimated when the company sells loans and is updated quarterly . any subsequent adjustment to the provision is recorded in other revenue in the consolidated statement of income . the activity in the repurchase reserve for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance beginning of the year</td><td>$ 75</td><td>$ 2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for new sales</td><td>33</td><td>23</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>change in estimate</td><td>493</td><td>59</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>utilizations</td><td>-119 ( 119 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance end of the year</td><td>$ 482</td><td>$ 75</td></tr></table> goodwill goodwill represents an acquired company 2019s acquisition cost over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired . goodwill is subject to annual impairment tests , whereby goodwill is allocated to the company 2019s reporting units and an impairment is deemed to exist if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value . furthermore , on any business dispositions , goodwill is allocated to the business disposed of based on the ratio of the fair value of the business disposed of to the fair value of the reporting unit . intangible assets intangible assets 2014including core deposit intangibles , present value of future profits , purchased credit card relationships , other customer relationships , and other intangible assets , but excluding msrs 2014are amortized over their estimated useful lives . intangible assets deemed to have indefinite useful lives , primarily certain asset management contracts and trade names , are not amortized and are subject to annual impairment tests . an impairment exists if the carrying value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value . for other intangible assets subject to amortization , an impairment is recognized if the carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds the fair value of the intangible asset . other assets and other liabilities other assets include , among other items , loans held-for-sale , deferred tax assets , equity-method investments , interest and fees receivable , premises and equipment , end-user derivatives in a net receivable position , repossessed assets , and other receivables. .
Question: what was the change in estimate in 2009?
| 493.0 |
CONVFINQA5286 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
citigroup 2019s repurchases are primarily from government sponsored entities . the specific representations and warranties made by the company depend on the nature of the transaction and the requirements of the buyer . market conditions and credit-ratings agency requirements may also affect representations and warranties and the other provisions the company may agree to in loan sales . in the event of a breach of the representations and warranties , the company may be required to either repurchase the mortgage loans ( generally at unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest ) with the identified defects or indemnify ( 201cmake-whole 201d ) the investor or insurer . the company has recorded a repurchase reserve that is included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet . in the case of a repurchase , the company will bear any subsequent credit loss on the mortgage loans . the company 2019s representations and warranties are generally not subject to stated limits in amount or time of coverage . however , contractual liability arises only when the representations and warranties are breached and generally only when a loss results from the breach . in the case of a repurchase , the loan is typically considered a credit- impaired loan and accounted for under sop 03-3 , 201caccounting for certain loans and debt securities , acquired in a transfer 201d ( now incorporated into asc 310-30 , receivables 2014loans and debt securities acquired with deteriorated credit quality ) . these repurchases have not had a material impact on nonperforming loan statistics , because credit-impaired purchased sop 03-3 loans are not included in nonaccrual loans . the company estimates its exposure to losses from its obligation to repurchase previously sold loans based on the probability of repurchase or make-whole and an estimated loss given repurchase or make-whole . this estimate is calculated separately by sales vintage ( i.e. , the year the loans were sold ) based on a combination of historical trends and forecasted repurchases and losses considering the : ( 1 ) trends in requests by investors for loan documentation packages to be reviewed ; ( 2 ) trends in recent repurchases and make-wholes ; ( 3 ) historical percentage of claims made as a percentage of loan documentation package requests ; ( 4 ) success rate in appealing claims ; ( 5 ) inventory of unresolved claims ; and ( 6 ) estimated loss given repurchase or make-whole , including the loss of principal , accrued interest , and foreclosure costs . the company does not change its estimation methodology by counterparty , but the historical experience and trends are considered when evaluating the overall reserve . the request for loan documentation packages is an early indicator of a potential claim . during 2009 , loan documentation package requests and the level of outstanding claims increased . in addition , our loss severity estimates increased during 2009 due to the impact of macroeconomic factors and recent experience . these factors contributed to a $ 493 million change in estimate for this reserve in 2009 . as indicated above , the repurchase reserve is calculated by sales vintage . the majority of the repurchases in 2009 were from the 2006 and 2007 sales vintages , which also represent the vintages with the largest loss- given-repurchase . an insignificant percentage of 2009 repurchases were from vintages prior to 2006 , and this is expected to decrease , because those vintages are later in the credit cycle . although early in the credit cycle , the company has experienced improved repurchase and loss-given-repurchase statistics from the 2008 and 2009 vintages . in the case of a repurchase of a credit-impaired sop 03-3 loan ( now incorporated into asc 310-30 ) , the difference between the loan 2019s fair value and unpaid principal balance at the time of the repurchase is recorded as a utilization of the repurchase reserve . payments to make the investor whole are also treated as utilizations and charged directly against the reserve . the provision for estimated probable losses arising from loan sales is recorded as an adjustment to the gain on sale , which is included in other revenue in the consolidated statement of income . a liability for representations and warranties is estimated when the company sells loans and is updated quarterly . any subsequent adjustment to the provision is recorded in other revenue in the consolidated statement of income . the activity in the repurchase reserve for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance beginning of the year</td><td>$ 75</td><td>$ 2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for new sales</td><td>33</td><td>23</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>change in estimate</td><td>493</td><td>59</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>utilizations</td><td>-119 ( 119 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance end of the year</td><td>$ 482</td><td>$ 75</td></tr></table> goodwill goodwill represents an acquired company 2019s acquisition cost over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired . goodwill is subject to annual impairment tests , whereby goodwill is allocated to the company 2019s reporting units and an impairment is deemed to exist if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value . furthermore , on any business dispositions , goodwill is allocated to the business disposed of based on the ratio of the fair value of the business disposed of to the fair value of the reporting unit . intangible assets intangible assets 2014including core deposit intangibles , present value of future profits , purchased credit card relationships , other customer relationships , and other intangible assets , but excluding msrs 2014are amortized over their estimated useful lives . intangible assets deemed to have indefinite useful lives , primarily certain asset management contracts and trade names , are not amortized and are subject to annual impairment tests . an impairment exists if the carrying value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value . for other intangible assets subject to amortization , an impairment is recognized if the carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds the fair value of the intangible asset . other assets and other liabilities other assets include , among other items , loans held-for-sale , deferred tax assets , equity-method investments , interest and fees receivable , premises and equipment , end-user derivatives in a net receivable position , repossessed assets , and other receivables. .
Question: what was the change in estimate in 2009?
Answer: 493.0
Question: and what was it in 2008?
| 59.0 |
CONVFINQA5287 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
citigroup 2019s repurchases are primarily from government sponsored entities . the specific representations and warranties made by the company depend on the nature of the transaction and the requirements of the buyer . market conditions and credit-ratings agency requirements may also affect representations and warranties and the other provisions the company may agree to in loan sales . in the event of a breach of the representations and warranties , the company may be required to either repurchase the mortgage loans ( generally at unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest ) with the identified defects or indemnify ( 201cmake-whole 201d ) the investor or insurer . the company has recorded a repurchase reserve that is included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet . in the case of a repurchase , the company will bear any subsequent credit loss on the mortgage loans . the company 2019s representations and warranties are generally not subject to stated limits in amount or time of coverage . however , contractual liability arises only when the representations and warranties are breached and generally only when a loss results from the breach . in the case of a repurchase , the loan is typically considered a credit- impaired loan and accounted for under sop 03-3 , 201caccounting for certain loans and debt securities , acquired in a transfer 201d ( now incorporated into asc 310-30 , receivables 2014loans and debt securities acquired with deteriorated credit quality ) . these repurchases have not had a material impact on nonperforming loan statistics , because credit-impaired purchased sop 03-3 loans are not included in nonaccrual loans . the company estimates its exposure to losses from its obligation to repurchase previously sold loans based on the probability of repurchase or make-whole and an estimated loss given repurchase or make-whole . this estimate is calculated separately by sales vintage ( i.e. , the year the loans were sold ) based on a combination of historical trends and forecasted repurchases and losses considering the : ( 1 ) trends in requests by investors for loan documentation packages to be reviewed ; ( 2 ) trends in recent repurchases and make-wholes ; ( 3 ) historical percentage of claims made as a percentage of loan documentation package requests ; ( 4 ) success rate in appealing claims ; ( 5 ) inventory of unresolved claims ; and ( 6 ) estimated loss given repurchase or make-whole , including the loss of principal , accrued interest , and foreclosure costs . the company does not change its estimation methodology by counterparty , but the historical experience and trends are considered when evaluating the overall reserve . the request for loan documentation packages is an early indicator of a potential claim . during 2009 , loan documentation package requests and the level of outstanding claims increased . in addition , our loss severity estimates increased during 2009 due to the impact of macroeconomic factors and recent experience . these factors contributed to a $ 493 million change in estimate for this reserve in 2009 . as indicated above , the repurchase reserve is calculated by sales vintage . the majority of the repurchases in 2009 were from the 2006 and 2007 sales vintages , which also represent the vintages with the largest loss- given-repurchase . an insignificant percentage of 2009 repurchases were from vintages prior to 2006 , and this is expected to decrease , because those vintages are later in the credit cycle . although early in the credit cycle , the company has experienced improved repurchase and loss-given-repurchase statistics from the 2008 and 2009 vintages . in the case of a repurchase of a credit-impaired sop 03-3 loan ( now incorporated into asc 310-30 ) , the difference between the loan 2019s fair value and unpaid principal balance at the time of the repurchase is recorded as a utilization of the repurchase reserve . payments to make the investor whole are also treated as utilizations and charged directly against the reserve . the provision for estimated probable losses arising from loan sales is recorded as an adjustment to the gain on sale , which is included in other revenue in the consolidated statement of income . a liability for representations and warranties is estimated when the company sells loans and is updated quarterly . any subsequent adjustment to the provision is recorded in other revenue in the consolidated statement of income . the activity in the repurchase reserve for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance beginning of the year</td><td>$ 75</td><td>$ 2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for new sales</td><td>33</td><td>23</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>change in estimate</td><td>493</td><td>59</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>utilizations</td><td>-119 ( 119 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance end of the year</td><td>$ 482</td><td>$ 75</td></tr></table> goodwill goodwill represents an acquired company 2019s acquisition cost over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired . goodwill is subject to annual impairment tests , whereby goodwill is allocated to the company 2019s reporting units and an impairment is deemed to exist if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value . furthermore , on any business dispositions , goodwill is allocated to the business disposed of based on the ratio of the fair value of the business disposed of to the fair value of the reporting unit . intangible assets intangible assets 2014including core deposit intangibles , present value of future profits , purchased credit card relationships , other customer relationships , and other intangible assets , but excluding msrs 2014are amortized over their estimated useful lives . intangible assets deemed to have indefinite useful lives , primarily certain asset management contracts and trade names , are not amortized and are subject to annual impairment tests . an impairment exists if the carrying value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value . for other intangible assets subject to amortization , an impairment is recognized if the carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds the fair value of the intangible asset . other assets and other liabilities other assets include , among other items , loans held-for-sale , deferred tax assets , equity-method investments , interest and fees receivable , premises and equipment , end-user derivatives in a net receivable position , repossessed assets , and other receivables. .
Question: what was the change in estimate in 2009?
Answer: 493.0
Question: and what was it in 2008?
Answer: 59.0
Question: how much, then, did the 2009 change represent in relation to this 2008 one?
| 8.35593 |
CONVFINQA5288 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
citigroup 2019s repurchases are primarily from government sponsored entities . the specific representations and warranties made by the company depend on the nature of the transaction and the requirements of the buyer . market conditions and credit-ratings agency requirements may also affect representations and warranties and the other provisions the company may agree to in loan sales . in the event of a breach of the representations and warranties , the company may be required to either repurchase the mortgage loans ( generally at unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest ) with the identified defects or indemnify ( 201cmake-whole 201d ) the investor or insurer . the company has recorded a repurchase reserve that is included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet . in the case of a repurchase , the company will bear any subsequent credit loss on the mortgage loans . the company 2019s representations and warranties are generally not subject to stated limits in amount or time of coverage . however , contractual liability arises only when the representations and warranties are breached and generally only when a loss results from the breach . in the case of a repurchase , the loan is typically considered a credit- impaired loan and accounted for under sop 03-3 , 201caccounting for certain loans and debt securities , acquired in a transfer 201d ( now incorporated into asc 310-30 , receivables 2014loans and debt securities acquired with deteriorated credit quality ) . these repurchases have not had a material impact on nonperforming loan statistics , because credit-impaired purchased sop 03-3 loans are not included in nonaccrual loans . the company estimates its exposure to losses from its obligation to repurchase previously sold loans based on the probability of repurchase or make-whole and an estimated loss given repurchase or make-whole . this estimate is calculated separately by sales vintage ( i.e. , the year the loans were sold ) based on a combination of historical trends and forecasted repurchases and losses considering the : ( 1 ) trends in requests by investors for loan documentation packages to be reviewed ; ( 2 ) trends in recent repurchases and make-wholes ; ( 3 ) historical percentage of claims made as a percentage of loan documentation package requests ; ( 4 ) success rate in appealing claims ; ( 5 ) inventory of unresolved claims ; and ( 6 ) estimated loss given repurchase or make-whole , including the loss of principal , accrued interest , and foreclosure costs . the company does not change its estimation methodology by counterparty , but the historical experience and trends are considered when evaluating the overall reserve . the request for loan documentation packages is an early indicator of a potential claim . during 2009 , loan documentation package requests and the level of outstanding claims increased . in addition , our loss severity estimates increased during 2009 due to the impact of macroeconomic factors and recent experience . these factors contributed to a $ 493 million change in estimate for this reserve in 2009 . as indicated above , the repurchase reserve is calculated by sales vintage . the majority of the repurchases in 2009 were from the 2006 and 2007 sales vintages , which also represent the vintages with the largest loss- given-repurchase . an insignificant percentage of 2009 repurchases were from vintages prior to 2006 , and this is expected to decrease , because those vintages are later in the credit cycle . although early in the credit cycle , the company has experienced improved repurchase and loss-given-repurchase statistics from the 2008 and 2009 vintages . in the case of a repurchase of a credit-impaired sop 03-3 loan ( now incorporated into asc 310-30 ) , the difference between the loan 2019s fair value and unpaid principal balance at the time of the repurchase is recorded as a utilization of the repurchase reserve . payments to make the investor whole are also treated as utilizations and charged directly against the reserve . the provision for estimated probable losses arising from loan sales is recorded as an adjustment to the gain on sale , which is included in other revenue in the consolidated statement of income . a liability for representations and warranties is estimated when the company sells loans and is updated quarterly . any subsequent adjustment to the provision is recorded in other revenue in the consolidated statement of income . the activity in the repurchase reserve for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance beginning of the year</td><td>$ 75</td><td>$ 2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for new sales</td><td>33</td><td>23</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>change in estimate</td><td>493</td><td>59</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>utilizations</td><td>-119 ( 119 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance end of the year</td><td>$ 482</td><td>$ 75</td></tr></table> goodwill goodwill represents an acquired company 2019s acquisition cost over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired . goodwill is subject to annual impairment tests , whereby goodwill is allocated to the company 2019s reporting units and an impairment is deemed to exist if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value . furthermore , on any business dispositions , goodwill is allocated to the business disposed of based on the ratio of the fair value of the business disposed of to the fair value of the reporting unit . intangible assets intangible assets 2014including core deposit intangibles , present value of future profits , purchased credit card relationships , other customer relationships , and other intangible assets , but excluding msrs 2014are amortized over their estimated useful lives . intangible assets deemed to have indefinite useful lives , primarily certain asset management contracts and trade names , are not amortized and are subject to annual impairment tests . an impairment exists if the carrying value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value . for other intangible assets subject to amortization , an impairment is recognized if the carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds the fair value of the intangible asset . other assets and other liabilities other assets include , among other items , loans held-for-sale , deferred tax assets , equity-method investments , interest and fees receivable , premises and equipment , end-user derivatives in a net receivable position , repossessed assets , and other receivables. .
Question: what was the change in estimate in 2009?
Answer: 493.0
Question: and what was it in 2008?
Answer: 59.0
Question: how much, then, did the 2009 change represent in relation to this 2008 one?
Answer: 8.35593
Question: and in that same two year period, what was the variation of the additions for new sales of the repurchase reserve?
| 10.0 |
CONVFINQA5289 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
citigroup 2019s repurchases are primarily from government sponsored entities . the specific representations and warranties made by the company depend on the nature of the transaction and the requirements of the buyer . market conditions and credit-ratings agency requirements may also affect representations and warranties and the other provisions the company may agree to in loan sales . in the event of a breach of the representations and warranties , the company may be required to either repurchase the mortgage loans ( generally at unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest ) with the identified defects or indemnify ( 201cmake-whole 201d ) the investor or insurer . the company has recorded a repurchase reserve that is included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet . in the case of a repurchase , the company will bear any subsequent credit loss on the mortgage loans . the company 2019s representations and warranties are generally not subject to stated limits in amount or time of coverage . however , contractual liability arises only when the representations and warranties are breached and generally only when a loss results from the breach . in the case of a repurchase , the loan is typically considered a credit- impaired loan and accounted for under sop 03-3 , 201caccounting for certain loans and debt securities , acquired in a transfer 201d ( now incorporated into asc 310-30 , receivables 2014loans and debt securities acquired with deteriorated credit quality ) . these repurchases have not had a material impact on nonperforming loan statistics , because credit-impaired purchased sop 03-3 loans are not included in nonaccrual loans . the company estimates its exposure to losses from its obligation to repurchase previously sold loans based on the probability of repurchase or make-whole and an estimated loss given repurchase or make-whole . this estimate is calculated separately by sales vintage ( i.e. , the year the loans were sold ) based on a combination of historical trends and forecasted repurchases and losses considering the : ( 1 ) trends in requests by investors for loan documentation packages to be reviewed ; ( 2 ) trends in recent repurchases and make-wholes ; ( 3 ) historical percentage of claims made as a percentage of loan documentation package requests ; ( 4 ) success rate in appealing claims ; ( 5 ) inventory of unresolved claims ; and ( 6 ) estimated loss given repurchase or make-whole , including the loss of principal , accrued interest , and foreclosure costs . the company does not change its estimation methodology by counterparty , but the historical experience and trends are considered when evaluating the overall reserve . the request for loan documentation packages is an early indicator of a potential claim . during 2009 , loan documentation package requests and the level of outstanding claims increased . in addition , our loss severity estimates increased during 2009 due to the impact of macroeconomic factors and recent experience . these factors contributed to a $ 493 million change in estimate for this reserve in 2009 . as indicated above , the repurchase reserve is calculated by sales vintage . the majority of the repurchases in 2009 were from the 2006 and 2007 sales vintages , which also represent the vintages with the largest loss- given-repurchase . an insignificant percentage of 2009 repurchases were from vintages prior to 2006 , and this is expected to decrease , because those vintages are later in the credit cycle . although early in the credit cycle , the company has experienced improved repurchase and loss-given-repurchase statistics from the 2008 and 2009 vintages . in the case of a repurchase of a credit-impaired sop 03-3 loan ( now incorporated into asc 310-30 ) , the difference between the loan 2019s fair value and unpaid principal balance at the time of the repurchase is recorded as a utilization of the repurchase reserve . payments to make the investor whole are also treated as utilizations and charged directly against the reserve . the provision for estimated probable losses arising from loan sales is recorded as an adjustment to the gain on sale , which is included in other revenue in the consolidated statement of income . a liability for representations and warranties is estimated when the company sells loans and is updated quarterly . any subsequent adjustment to the provision is recorded in other revenue in the consolidated statement of income . the activity in the repurchase reserve for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance beginning of the year</td><td>$ 75</td><td>$ 2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for new sales</td><td>33</td><td>23</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>change in estimate</td><td>493</td><td>59</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>utilizations</td><td>-119 ( 119 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance end of the year</td><td>$ 482</td><td>$ 75</td></tr></table> goodwill goodwill represents an acquired company 2019s acquisition cost over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired . goodwill is subject to annual impairment tests , whereby goodwill is allocated to the company 2019s reporting units and an impairment is deemed to exist if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value . furthermore , on any business dispositions , goodwill is allocated to the business disposed of based on the ratio of the fair value of the business disposed of to the fair value of the reporting unit . intangible assets intangible assets 2014including core deposit intangibles , present value of future profits , purchased credit card relationships , other customer relationships , and other intangible assets , but excluding msrs 2014are amortized over their estimated useful lives . intangible assets deemed to have indefinite useful lives , primarily certain asset management contracts and trade names , are not amortized and are subject to annual impairment tests . an impairment exists if the carrying value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value . for other intangible assets subject to amortization , an impairment is recognized if the carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds the fair value of the intangible asset . other assets and other liabilities other assets include , among other items , loans held-for-sale , deferred tax assets , equity-method investments , interest and fees receivable , premises and equipment , end-user derivatives in a net receivable position , repossessed assets , and other receivables. .
Question: what was the change in estimate in 2009?
Answer: 493.0
Question: and what was it in 2008?
Answer: 59.0
Question: how much, then, did the 2009 change represent in relation to this 2008 one?
Answer: 8.35593
Question: and in that same two year period, what was the variation of the additions for new sales of the repurchase reserve?
Answer: 10.0
Question: and what were those additions in 2008?
| 23.0 |
CONVFINQA5290 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
citigroup 2019s repurchases are primarily from government sponsored entities . the specific representations and warranties made by the company depend on the nature of the transaction and the requirements of the buyer . market conditions and credit-ratings agency requirements may also affect representations and warranties and the other provisions the company may agree to in loan sales . in the event of a breach of the representations and warranties , the company may be required to either repurchase the mortgage loans ( generally at unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest ) with the identified defects or indemnify ( 201cmake-whole 201d ) the investor or insurer . the company has recorded a repurchase reserve that is included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet . in the case of a repurchase , the company will bear any subsequent credit loss on the mortgage loans . the company 2019s representations and warranties are generally not subject to stated limits in amount or time of coverage . however , contractual liability arises only when the representations and warranties are breached and generally only when a loss results from the breach . in the case of a repurchase , the loan is typically considered a credit- impaired loan and accounted for under sop 03-3 , 201caccounting for certain loans and debt securities , acquired in a transfer 201d ( now incorporated into asc 310-30 , receivables 2014loans and debt securities acquired with deteriorated credit quality ) . these repurchases have not had a material impact on nonperforming loan statistics , because credit-impaired purchased sop 03-3 loans are not included in nonaccrual loans . the company estimates its exposure to losses from its obligation to repurchase previously sold loans based on the probability of repurchase or make-whole and an estimated loss given repurchase or make-whole . this estimate is calculated separately by sales vintage ( i.e. , the year the loans were sold ) based on a combination of historical trends and forecasted repurchases and losses considering the : ( 1 ) trends in requests by investors for loan documentation packages to be reviewed ; ( 2 ) trends in recent repurchases and make-wholes ; ( 3 ) historical percentage of claims made as a percentage of loan documentation package requests ; ( 4 ) success rate in appealing claims ; ( 5 ) inventory of unresolved claims ; and ( 6 ) estimated loss given repurchase or make-whole , including the loss of principal , accrued interest , and foreclosure costs . the company does not change its estimation methodology by counterparty , but the historical experience and trends are considered when evaluating the overall reserve . the request for loan documentation packages is an early indicator of a potential claim . during 2009 , loan documentation package requests and the level of outstanding claims increased . in addition , our loss severity estimates increased during 2009 due to the impact of macroeconomic factors and recent experience . these factors contributed to a $ 493 million change in estimate for this reserve in 2009 . as indicated above , the repurchase reserve is calculated by sales vintage . the majority of the repurchases in 2009 were from the 2006 and 2007 sales vintages , which also represent the vintages with the largest loss- given-repurchase . an insignificant percentage of 2009 repurchases were from vintages prior to 2006 , and this is expected to decrease , because those vintages are later in the credit cycle . although early in the credit cycle , the company has experienced improved repurchase and loss-given-repurchase statistics from the 2008 and 2009 vintages . in the case of a repurchase of a credit-impaired sop 03-3 loan ( now incorporated into asc 310-30 ) , the difference between the loan 2019s fair value and unpaid principal balance at the time of the repurchase is recorded as a utilization of the repurchase reserve . payments to make the investor whole are also treated as utilizations and charged directly against the reserve . the provision for estimated probable losses arising from loan sales is recorded as an adjustment to the gain on sale , which is included in other revenue in the consolidated statement of income . a liability for representations and warranties is estimated when the company sells loans and is updated quarterly . any subsequent adjustment to the provision is recorded in other revenue in the consolidated statement of income . the activity in the repurchase reserve for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance beginning of the year</td><td>$ 75</td><td>$ 2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for new sales</td><td>33</td><td>23</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>change in estimate</td><td>493</td><td>59</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>utilizations</td><td>-119 ( 119 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance end of the year</td><td>$ 482</td><td>$ 75</td></tr></table> goodwill goodwill represents an acquired company 2019s acquisition cost over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired . goodwill is subject to annual impairment tests , whereby goodwill is allocated to the company 2019s reporting units and an impairment is deemed to exist if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value . furthermore , on any business dispositions , goodwill is allocated to the business disposed of based on the ratio of the fair value of the business disposed of to the fair value of the reporting unit . intangible assets intangible assets 2014including core deposit intangibles , present value of future profits , purchased credit card relationships , other customer relationships , and other intangible assets , but excluding msrs 2014are amortized over their estimated useful lives . intangible assets deemed to have indefinite useful lives , primarily certain asset management contracts and trade names , are not amortized and are subject to annual impairment tests . an impairment exists if the carrying value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value . for other intangible assets subject to amortization , an impairment is recognized if the carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds the fair value of the intangible asset . other assets and other liabilities other assets include , among other items , loans held-for-sale , deferred tax assets , equity-method investments , interest and fees receivable , premises and equipment , end-user derivatives in a net receivable position , repossessed assets , and other receivables. .
Question: what was the change in estimate in 2009?
Answer: 493.0
Question: and what was it in 2008?
Answer: 59.0
Question: how much, then, did the 2009 change represent in relation to this 2008 one?
Answer: 8.35593
Question: and in that same two year period, what was the variation of the additions for new sales of the repurchase reserve?
Answer: 10.0
Question: and what were those additions in 2008?
Answer: 23.0
Question: what percentage, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2008 amount?
| 0.43478 |
CONVFINQA5291 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>global payments</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p information technology</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>may 31 2002</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>may 31 2003</td><td>94.20</td><td>91.94</td><td>94.48</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>may 31 2004</td><td>129.77</td><td>108.79</td><td>115.24</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>may 31 2005</td><td>193.30</td><td>117.75</td><td>116.29</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>may 31 2006</td><td>260.35</td><td>127.92</td><td>117.14</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>may 31 2007</td><td>224.24</td><td>157.08</td><td>144.11</td></tr></table> issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million . the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit . there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization . no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. .
Question: what was the value of global payments in 2003?
| 94.2 |
CONVFINQA5292 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>global payments</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p information technology</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>may 31 2002</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>may 31 2003</td><td>94.20</td><td>91.94</td><td>94.48</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>may 31 2004</td><td>129.77</td><td>108.79</td><td>115.24</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>may 31 2005</td><td>193.30</td><td>117.75</td><td>116.29</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>may 31 2006</td><td>260.35</td><td>127.92</td><td>117.14</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>may 31 2007</td><td>224.24</td><td>157.08</td><td>144.11</td></tr></table> issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million . the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit . there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization . no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. .
Question: what was the value of global payments in 2003?
Answer: 94.2
Question: and what was the change in this value from 2002 to that year?
| -5.8 |
CONVFINQA5293 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>global payments</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p information technology</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>may 31 2002</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>may 31 2003</td><td>94.20</td><td>91.94</td><td>94.48</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>may 31 2004</td><td>129.77</td><td>108.79</td><td>115.24</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>may 31 2005</td><td>193.30</td><td>117.75</td><td>116.29</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>may 31 2006</td><td>260.35</td><td>127.92</td><td>117.14</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>may 31 2007</td><td>224.24</td><td>157.08</td><td>144.11</td></tr></table> issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million . the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit . there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization . no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. .
Question: what was the value of global payments in 2003?
Answer: 94.2
Question: and what was the change in this value from 2002 to that year?
Answer: -5.8
Question: what is that change as a portion of the 2002 value of that stock?
| -0.058 |
CONVFINQA5294 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>global payments</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p information technology</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>may 31 2002</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>may 31 2003</td><td>94.20</td><td>91.94</td><td>94.48</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>may 31 2004</td><td>129.77</td><td>108.79</td><td>115.24</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>may 31 2005</td><td>193.30</td><td>117.75</td><td>116.29</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>may 31 2006</td><td>260.35</td><td>127.92</td><td>117.14</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>may 31 2007</td><td>224.24</td><td>157.08</td><td>144.11</td></tr></table> issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million . the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit . there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization . no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. .
Question: what was the value of global payments in 2003?
Answer: 94.2
Question: and what was the change in this value from 2002 to that year?
Answer: -5.8
Question: what is that change as a portion of the 2002 value of that stock?
Answer: -0.058
Question: and throughout the subsequent year, what was the change in the value of global payments?
| 35.57 |
CONVFINQA5295 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>global payments</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p information technology</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>may 31 2002</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>may 31 2003</td><td>94.20</td><td>91.94</td><td>94.48</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>may 31 2004</td><td>129.77</td><td>108.79</td><td>115.24</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>may 31 2005</td><td>193.30</td><td>117.75</td><td>116.29</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>may 31 2006</td><td>260.35</td><td>127.92</td><td>117.14</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>may 31 2007</td><td>224.24</td><td>157.08</td><td>144.11</td></tr></table> issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million . the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit . there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization . no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. .
Question: what was the value of global payments in 2003?
Answer: 94.2
Question: and what was the change in this value from 2002 to that year?
Answer: -5.8
Question: what is that change as a portion of the 2002 value of that stock?
Answer: -0.058
Question: and throughout the subsequent year, what was the change in the value of global payments?
Answer: 35.57
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to the 2003 value?
| 0.3776 |
CONVFINQA5296 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector in recent years . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 301.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>53.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>56.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>194.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2012</td><td>410.0</td></tr></table> our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .
Question: what was the total of pre-tax catastrophe losses in the years of 2015 and 2016, combined?
| 355.0 |
CONVFINQA5297 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector in recent years . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 301.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>53.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>56.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>194.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2012</td><td>410.0</td></tr></table> our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .
Question: what was the total of pre-tax catastrophe losses in the years of 2015 and 2016, combined?
Answer: 355.0
Question: including the year of 2014, what would then be the total of pre-tax catastrophe losses for the three years?
| 411.3 |
CONVFINQA5298 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector in recent years . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 301.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>53.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>56.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>194.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2012</td><td>410.0</td></tr></table> our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .
Question: what was the total of pre-tax catastrophe losses in the years of 2015 and 2016, combined?
Answer: 355.0
Question: including the year of 2014, what would then be the total of pre-tax catastrophe losses for the three years?
Answer: 411.3
Question: what was the total of pre-tax catastrophe losses in 2013?
| 194.0 |
CONVFINQA5299 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector in recent years . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 301.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>53.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>56.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>194.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2012</td><td>410.0</td></tr></table> our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .
Question: what was the total of pre-tax catastrophe losses in the years of 2015 and 2016, combined?
Answer: 355.0
Question: including the year of 2014, what would then be the total of pre-tax catastrophe losses for the three years?
Answer: 411.3
Question: what was the total of pre-tax catastrophe losses in 2013?
Answer: 194.0
Question: including now the year of 2013, what would be the total for the four years?
| 605.3 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.