id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA5500 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
for the year ended december 31 , 2005 , we realized net losses of $ 1 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 1 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2004 , net of deferred taxes of less than $ 1 million , related to these sales . for the year ended december 31 , 2004 , we realized net gains of $ 26 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 11 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2003 , net of deferred taxes of $ 7 million , related to these sales . note 13 . equity-based compensation the 2006 equity incentive plan was approved by shareholders in april 2006 , and 20000000 shares of common stock were approved for issuance for stock and stock-based awards , including stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock , deferred stock and performance awards . in addition , up to 8000000 shares from our 1997 equity incentive plan , that were available to issue or become available due to cancellations and forfeitures , may be awarded under the 2006 plan . the 1997 plan expired on december 18 , 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , 1305420 shares from the 1997 plan have been added to and may be awarded from the 2006 plan . as of december 31 , 2006 , 106045 awards have been made under the 2006 plan . we have stock options outstanding from previous plans , including the 1997 plan , under which no further grants can be made . the exercise price of non-qualified and incentive stock options and stock appreciation rights may not be less than the fair value of such shares at the date of grant . stock options and stock appreciation rights issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan generally vest over four years and expire no later than ten years from the date of grant . for restricted stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , stock certificates are issued at the time of grant and recipients have dividend and voting rights . in general , these grants vest over three years . for deferred stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , no stock is issued at the time of grant . generally , these grants vest over two- , three- or four-year periods . performance awards granted under the 2006 equity incentive plan and the prior 1997 plan are earned over a performance period based on achievement of goals , generally over two- to three- year periods . payment for performance awards is made in shares of our common stock or in cash equal to the fair market value of our common stock , based on certain financial ratios after the conclusion of each performance period . we record compensation expense , equal to the estimated fair value of the options on the grant date , on a straight-line basis over the options 2019 vesting period . we use a black-scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of the options granted . the weighted-average assumptions used in connection with the option-pricing model were as follows for the years indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % )</td><td>1.85% ( 1.85 % )</td><td>1.35% ( 1.35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>26.50</td><td>28.70</td><td>27.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>4.60</td><td>4.19</td><td>3.02</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected option lives ( in years )</td><td>7.8</td><td>7.8</td><td>5.0</td></tr></table> compensation expense related to stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock awards , deferred stock awards and performance awards , which we record as a component of salaries and employee benefits expense in our consolidated statement of income , was $ 208 million , $ 110 million and $ 74 million for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the related total income tax benefit recorded in our consolidated statement of income was $ 83 million , $ 44 million and $ 30 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . seq 87 copyarea : 38 . x 54 . trimsize : 8.25 x 10.75 typeset state street corporation serverprocess c:\\fc\\delivery_1024177\\2771-1-do_p.pdf chksum : 0 cycle 1merrill corporation 07-2771-1 thu mar 01 17:11:13 2007 ( v 2.247w--stp1pae18 ) .
Question: what was the risk-free interest rate in 2005?
Answer: 4.19
Question: and in 2004?
Answer: 3.02
Question: so what was the difference between these two years?
Answer: 1.17
Question: and the value for 2004 again?
| 3.02 |
CONVFINQA5501 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
for the year ended december 31 , 2005 , we realized net losses of $ 1 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 1 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2004 , net of deferred taxes of less than $ 1 million , related to these sales . for the year ended december 31 , 2004 , we realized net gains of $ 26 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 11 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2003 , net of deferred taxes of $ 7 million , related to these sales . note 13 . equity-based compensation the 2006 equity incentive plan was approved by shareholders in april 2006 , and 20000000 shares of common stock were approved for issuance for stock and stock-based awards , including stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock , deferred stock and performance awards . in addition , up to 8000000 shares from our 1997 equity incentive plan , that were available to issue or become available due to cancellations and forfeitures , may be awarded under the 2006 plan . the 1997 plan expired on december 18 , 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , 1305420 shares from the 1997 plan have been added to and may be awarded from the 2006 plan . as of december 31 , 2006 , 106045 awards have been made under the 2006 plan . we have stock options outstanding from previous plans , including the 1997 plan , under which no further grants can be made . the exercise price of non-qualified and incentive stock options and stock appreciation rights may not be less than the fair value of such shares at the date of grant . stock options and stock appreciation rights issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan generally vest over four years and expire no later than ten years from the date of grant . for restricted stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , stock certificates are issued at the time of grant and recipients have dividend and voting rights . in general , these grants vest over three years . for deferred stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , no stock is issued at the time of grant . generally , these grants vest over two- , three- or four-year periods . performance awards granted under the 2006 equity incentive plan and the prior 1997 plan are earned over a performance period based on achievement of goals , generally over two- to three- year periods . payment for performance awards is made in shares of our common stock or in cash equal to the fair market value of our common stock , based on certain financial ratios after the conclusion of each performance period . we record compensation expense , equal to the estimated fair value of the options on the grant date , on a straight-line basis over the options 2019 vesting period . we use a black-scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of the options granted . the weighted-average assumptions used in connection with the option-pricing model were as follows for the years indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % )</td><td>1.85% ( 1.85 % )</td><td>1.35% ( 1.35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>26.50</td><td>28.70</td><td>27.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>4.60</td><td>4.19</td><td>3.02</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected option lives ( in years )</td><td>7.8</td><td>7.8</td><td>5.0</td></tr></table> compensation expense related to stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock awards , deferred stock awards and performance awards , which we record as a component of salaries and employee benefits expense in our consolidated statement of income , was $ 208 million , $ 110 million and $ 74 million for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the related total income tax benefit recorded in our consolidated statement of income was $ 83 million , $ 44 million and $ 30 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . seq 87 copyarea : 38 . x 54 . trimsize : 8.25 x 10.75 typeset state street corporation serverprocess c:\\fc\\delivery_1024177\\2771-1-do_p.pdf chksum : 0 cycle 1merrill corporation 07-2771-1 thu mar 01 17:11:13 2007 ( v 2.247w--stp1pae18 ) .
Question: what was the risk-free interest rate in 2005?
Answer: 4.19
Question: and in 2004?
Answer: 3.02
Question: so what was the difference between these two years?
Answer: 1.17
Question: and the value for 2004 again?
Answer: 3.02
Question: so what was the percentage change in this value over the year?
| 0.38742 |
CONVFINQA5502 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2010 , we granted 3.8 million rsus and 1.1 million employee sars . see footnote no . 4 , 201cshare-based compensation , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for additional information . new accounting standards see footnote no . 1 , 201csummary of significant accounting policies , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for information related to our adoption of new accounting standards in 2010 and for information on our anticipated adoption of recently issued accounting standards . liquidity and capital resources cash requirements and our credit facilities our credit facility , which expires on may 14 , 2012 , and associated letters of credit , provide for $ 2.4 billion of aggregate effective borrowings . borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus a fixed spread based on the credit ratings for our public debt . we also pay quarterly fees on the credit facility at a rate based on our public debt rating . for additional information on our credit facility , including participating financial institutions , see exhibit 10 , 201camended and restated credit agreement , 201d to our current report on form 8-k filed with the sec on may 16 , 2007 . although our credit facility does not expire until 2012 , we expect that we may extend or replace it during 2011 . the credit facility contains certain covenants , including a single financial covenant that limits our maximum leverage ( consisting of adjusted total debt to consolidated ebitda , each as defined in the credit facility ) to not more than 4 to 1 . our outstanding public debt does not contain a corresponding financial covenant or a requirement that we maintain certain financial ratios . we currently satisfy the covenants in our credit facility and public debt instruments , including the leverage covenant under the credit facility , and do not expect the covenants to restrict our ability to meet our anticipated borrowing and guarantee levels or increase those levels should we need to do so in the future . we believe the credit facility , together with cash we expect to generate from operations and our ability to raise capital , remains adequate to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements , finance our long-term growth plans , meet debt service , and fulfill other cash requirements . at year-end 2010 , our available borrowing capacity amounted to $ 2.831 billion and reflected borrowing capacity of $ 2.326 billion under our credit facility and our cash balance of $ 505 million . we calculate that borrowing capacity by taking $ 2.404 billion of effective aggregate bank commitments under our credit facility and subtracting $ 78 million of outstanding letters of credit under our credit facility . during 2010 , we repaid our outstanding credit facility borrowings and had no outstanding balance at year-end . as noted in the previous paragraphs , we anticipate that this available capacity will be adequate to fund our liquidity needs . since we continue to have ample flexibility under the credit facility 2019s covenants , we also expect that undrawn bank commitments under the credit facility will remain available to us even if business conditions were to deteriorate markedly . cash from operations cash from operations , depreciation expense , and amortization expense for the last three fiscal years are as follows : ( $ in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash from operations</td><td>$ 1151</td><td>$ 868</td><td>$ 641</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation expense</td><td>138</td><td>151</td><td>155</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amortization expense</td><td>40</td><td>34</td><td>35</td></tr></table> our ratio of current assets to current liabilities was roughly 1.4 to 1.0 at year-end 2010 and 1.2 to 1.0 at year-end 2009 . we minimize working capital through cash management , strict credit-granting policies , and aggressive collection efforts . we also have significant borrowing capacity under our credit facility should we need additional working capital. .
Question: what is the net change in cash from operations from 2008 to 2009?
| 227.0 |
CONVFINQA5503 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2010 , we granted 3.8 million rsus and 1.1 million employee sars . see footnote no . 4 , 201cshare-based compensation , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for additional information . new accounting standards see footnote no . 1 , 201csummary of significant accounting policies , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for information related to our adoption of new accounting standards in 2010 and for information on our anticipated adoption of recently issued accounting standards . liquidity and capital resources cash requirements and our credit facilities our credit facility , which expires on may 14 , 2012 , and associated letters of credit , provide for $ 2.4 billion of aggregate effective borrowings . borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus a fixed spread based on the credit ratings for our public debt . we also pay quarterly fees on the credit facility at a rate based on our public debt rating . for additional information on our credit facility , including participating financial institutions , see exhibit 10 , 201camended and restated credit agreement , 201d to our current report on form 8-k filed with the sec on may 16 , 2007 . although our credit facility does not expire until 2012 , we expect that we may extend or replace it during 2011 . the credit facility contains certain covenants , including a single financial covenant that limits our maximum leverage ( consisting of adjusted total debt to consolidated ebitda , each as defined in the credit facility ) to not more than 4 to 1 . our outstanding public debt does not contain a corresponding financial covenant or a requirement that we maintain certain financial ratios . we currently satisfy the covenants in our credit facility and public debt instruments , including the leverage covenant under the credit facility , and do not expect the covenants to restrict our ability to meet our anticipated borrowing and guarantee levels or increase those levels should we need to do so in the future . we believe the credit facility , together with cash we expect to generate from operations and our ability to raise capital , remains adequate to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements , finance our long-term growth plans , meet debt service , and fulfill other cash requirements . at year-end 2010 , our available borrowing capacity amounted to $ 2.831 billion and reflected borrowing capacity of $ 2.326 billion under our credit facility and our cash balance of $ 505 million . we calculate that borrowing capacity by taking $ 2.404 billion of effective aggregate bank commitments under our credit facility and subtracting $ 78 million of outstanding letters of credit under our credit facility . during 2010 , we repaid our outstanding credit facility borrowings and had no outstanding balance at year-end . as noted in the previous paragraphs , we anticipate that this available capacity will be adequate to fund our liquidity needs . since we continue to have ample flexibility under the credit facility 2019s covenants , we also expect that undrawn bank commitments under the credit facility will remain available to us even if business conditions were to deteriorate markedly . cash from operations cash from operations , depreciation expense , and amortization expense for the last three fiscal years are as follows : ( $ in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash from operations</td><td>$ 1151</td><td>$ 868</td><td>$ 641</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation expense</td><td>138</td><td>151</td><td>155</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amortization expense</td><td>40</td><td>34</td><td>35</td></tr></table> our ratio of current assets to current liabilities was roughly 1.4 to 1.0 at year-end 2010 and 1.2 to 1.0 at year-end 2009 . we minimize working capital through cash management , strict credit-granting policies , and aggressive collection efforts . we also have significant borrowing capacity under our credit facility should we need additional working capital. .
Question: what is the net change in cash from operations from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 227.0
Question: what is the cash from operations in 2008?
| 641.0 |
CONVFINQA5504 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2010 , we granted 3.8 million rsus and 1.1 million employee sars . see footnote no . 4 , 201cshare-based compensation , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for additional information . new accounting standards see footnote no . 1 , 201csummary of significant accounting policies , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for information related to our adoption of new accounting standards in 2010 and for information on our anticipated adoption of recently issued accounting standards . liquidity and capital resources cash requirements and our credit facilities our credit facility , which expires on may 14 , 2012 , and associated letters of credit , provide for $ 2.4 billion of aggregate effective borrowings . borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus a fixed spread based on the credit ratings for our public debt . we also pay quarterly fees on the credit facility at a rate based on our public debt rating . for additional information on our credit facility , including participating financial institutions , see exhibit 10 , 201camended and restated credit agreement , 201d to our current report on form 8-k filed with the sec on may 16 , 2007 . although our credit facility does not expire until 2012 , we expect that we may extend or replace it during 2011 . the credit facility contains certain covenants , including a single financial covenant that limits our maximum leverage ( consisting of adjusted total debt to consolidated ebitda , each as defined in the credit facility ) to not more than 4 to 1 . our outstanding public debt does not contain a corresponding financial covenant or a requirement that we maintain certain financial ratios . we currently satisfy the covenants in our credit facility and public debt instruments , including the leverage covenant under the credit facility , and do not expect the covenants to restrict our ability to meet our anticipated borrowing and guarantee levels or increase those levels should we need to do so in the future . we believe the credit facility , together with cash we expect to generate from operations and our ability to raise capital , remains adequate to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements , finance our long-term growth plans , meet debt service , and fulfill other cash requirements . at year-end 2010 , our available borrowing capacity amounted to $ 2.831 billion and reflected borrowing capacity of $ 2.326 billion under our credit facility and our cash balance of $ 505 million . we calculate that borrowing capacity by taking $ 2.404 billion of effective aggregate bank commitments under our credit facility and subtracting $ 78 million of outstanding letters of credit under our credit facility . during 2010 , we repaid our outstanding credit facility borrowings and had no outstanding balance at year-end . as noted in the previous paragraphs , we anticipate that this available capacity will be adequate to fund our liquidity needs . since we continue to have ample flexibility under the credit facility 2019s covenants , we also expect that undrawn bank commitments under the credit facility will remain available to us even if business conditions were to deteriorate markedly . cash from operations cash from operations , depreciation expense , and amortization expense for the last three fiscal years are as follows : ( $ in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash from operations</td><td>$ 1151</td><td>$ 868</td><td>$ 641</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation expense</td><td>138</td><td>151</td><td>155</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amortization expense</td><td>40</td><td>34</td><td>35</td></tr></table> our ratio of current assets to current liabilities was roughly 1.4 to 1.0 at year-end 2010 and 1.2 to 1.0 at year-end 2009 . we minimize working capital through cash management , strict credit-granting policies , and aggressive collection efforts . we also have significant borrowing capacity under our credit facility should we need additional working capital. .
Question: what is the net change in cash from operations from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 227.0
Question: what is the cash from operations in 2008?
Answer: 641.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.35413 |
CONVFINQA5505 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2010 , we granted 3.8 million rsus and 1.1 million employee sars . see footnote no . 4 , 201cshare-based compensation , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for additional information . new accounting standards see footnote no . 1 , 201csummary of significant accounting policies , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for information related to our adoption of new accounting standards in 2010 and for information on our anticipated adoption of recently issued accounting standards . liquidity and capital resources cash requirements and our credit facilities our credit facility , which expires on may 14 , 2012 , and associated letters of credit , provide for $ 2.4 billion of aggregate effective borrowings . borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus a fixed spread based on the credit ratings for our public debt . we also pay quarterly fees on the credit facility at a rate based on our public debt rating . for additional information on our credit facility , including participating financial institutions , see exhibit 10 , 201camended and restated credit agreement , 201d to our current report on form 8-k filed with the sec on may 16 , 2007 . although our credit facility does not expire until 2012 , we expect that we may extend or replace it during 2011 . the credit facility contains certain covenants , including a single financial covenant that limits our maximum leverage ( consisting of adjusted total debt to consolidated ebitda , each as defined in the credit facility ) to not more than 4 to 1 . our outstanding public debt does not contain a corresponding financial covenant or a requirement that we maintain certain financial ratios . we currently satisfy the covenants in our credit facility and public debt instruments , including the leverage covenant under the credit facility , and do not expect the covenants to restrict our ability to meet our anticipated borrowing and guarantee levels or increase those levels should we need to do so in the future . we believe the credit facility , together with cash we expect to generate from operations and our ability to raise capital , remains adequate to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements , finance our long-term growth plans , meet debt service , and fulfill other cash requirements . at year-end 2010 , our available borrowing capacity amounted to $ 2.831 billion and reflected borrowing capacity of $ 2.326 billion under our credit facility and our cash balance of $ 505 million . we calculate that borrowing capacity by taking $ 2.404 billion of effective aggregate bank commitments under our credit facility and subtracting $ 78 million of outstanding letters of credit under our credit facility . during 2010 , we repaid our outstanding credit facility borrowings and had no outstanding balance at year-end . as noted in the previous paragraphs , we anticipate that this available capacity will be adequate to fund our liquidity needs . since we continue to have ample flexibility under the credit facility 2019s covenants , we also expect that undrawn bank commitments under the credit facility will remain available to us even if business conditions were to deteriorate markedly . cash from operations cash from operations , depreciation expense , and amortization expense for the last three fiscal years are as follows : ( $ in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash from operations</td><td>$ 1151</td><td>$ 868</td><td>$ 641</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation expense</td><td>138</td><td>151</td><td>155</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amortization expense</td><td>40</td><td>34</td><td>35</td></tr></table> our ratio of current assets to current liabilities was roughly 1.4 to 1.0 at year-end 2010 and 1.2 to 1.0 at year-end 2009 . we minimize working capital through cash management , strict credit-granting policies , and aggressive collection efforts . we also have significant borrowing capacity under our credit facility should we need additional working capital. .
Question: what is the net change in cash from operations from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 227.0
Question: what is the cash from operations in 2008?
Answer: 641.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.35413
Question: what about the cash from operations in 2010?
| 1151.0 |
CONVFINQA5506 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2010 , we granted 3.8 million rsus and 1.1 million employee sars . see footnote no . 4 , 201cshare-based compensation , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for additional information . new accounting standards see footnote no . 1 , 201csummary of significant accounting policies , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for information related to our adoption of new accounting standards in 2010 and for information on our anticipated adoption of recently issued accounting standards . liquidity and capital resources cash requirements and our credit facilities our credit facility , which expires on may 14 , 2012 , and associated letters of credit , provide for $ 2.4 billion of aggregate effective borrowings . borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus a fixed spread based on the credit ratings for our public debt . we also pay quarterly fees on the credit facility at a rate based on our public debt rating . for additional information on our credit facility , including participating financial institutions , see exhibit 10 , 201camended and restated credit agreement , 201d to our current report on form 8-k filed with the sec on may 16 , 2007 . although our credit facility does not expire until 2012 , we expect that we may extend or replace it during 2011 . the credit facility contains certain covenants , including a single financial covenant that limits our maximum leverage ( consisting of adjusted total debt to consolidated ebitda , each as defined in the credit facility ) to not more than 4 to 1 . our outstanding public debt does not contain a corresponding financial covenant or a requirement that we maintain certain financial ratios . we currently satisfy the covenants in our credit facility and public debt instruments , including the leverage covenant under the credit facility , and do not expect the covenants to restrict our ability to meet our anticipated borrowing and guarantee levels or increase those levels should we need to do so in the future . we believe the credit facility , together with cash we expect to generate from operations and our ability to raise capital , remains adequate to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements , finance our long-term growth plans , meet debt service , and fulfill other cash requirements . at year-end 2010 , our available borrowing capacity amounted to $ 2.831 billion and reflected borrowing capacity of $ 2.326 billion under our credit facility and our cash balance of $ 505 million . we calculate that borrowing capacity by taking $ 2.404 billion of effective aggregate bank commitments under our credit facility and subtracting $ 78 million of outstanding letters of credit under our credit facility . during 2010 , we repaid our outstanding credit facility borrowings and had no outstanding balance at year-end . as noted in the previous paragraphs , we anticipate that this available capacity will be adequate to fund our liquidity needs . since we continue to have ample flexibility under the credit facility 2019s covenants , we also expect that undrawn bank commitments under the credit facility will remain available to us even if business conditions were to deteriorate markedly . cash from operations cash from operations , depreciation expense , and amortization expense for the last three fiscal years are as follows : ( $ in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash from operations</td><td>$ 1151</td><td>$ 868</td><td>$ 641</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation expense</td><td>138</td><td>151</td><td>155</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amortization expense</td><td>40</td><td>34</td><td>35</td></tr></table> our ratio of current assets to current liabilities was roughly 1.4 to 1.0 at year-end 2010 and 1.2 to 1.0 at year-end 2009 . we minimize working capital through cash management , strict credit-granting policies , and aggressive collection efforts . we also have significant borrowing capacity under our credit facility should we need additional working capital. .
Question: what is the net change in cash from operations from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 227.0
Question: what is the cash from operations in 2008?
Answer: 641.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.35413
Question: what about the cash from operations in 2010?
Answer: 1151.0
Question: and in 2009?
| 868.0 |
CONVFINQA5507 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2010 , we granted 3.8 million rsus and 1.1 million employee sars . see footnote no . 4 , 201cshare-based compensation , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for additional information . new accounting standards see footnote no . 1 , 201csummary of significant accounting policies , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for information related to our adoption of new accounting standards in 2010 and for information on our anticipated adoption of recently issued accounting standards . liquidity and capital resources cash requirements and our credit facilities our credit facility , which expires on may 14 , 2012 , and associated letters of credit , provide for $ 2.4 billion of aggregate effective borrowings . borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus a fixed spread based on the credit ratings for our public debt . we also pay quarterly fees on the credit facility at a rate based on our public debt rating . for additional information on our credit facility , including participating financial institutions , see exhibit 10 , 201camended and restated credit agreement , 201d to our current report on form 8-k filed with the sec on may 16 , 2007 . although our credit facility does not expire until 2012 , we expect that we may extend or replace it during 2011 . the credit facility contains certain covenants , including a single financial covenant that limits our maximum leverage ( consisting of adjusted total debt to consolidated ebitda , each as defined in the credit facility ) to not more than 4 to 1 . our outstanding public debt does not contain a corresponding financial covenant or a requirement that we maintain certain financial ratios . we currently satisfy the covenants in our credit facility and public debt instruments , including the leverage covenant under the credit facility , and do not expect the covenants to restrict our ability to meet our anticipated borrowing and guarantee levels or increase those levels should we need to do so in the future . we believe the credit facility , together with cash we expect to generate from operations and our ability to raise capital , remains adequate to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements , finance our long-term growth plans , meet debt service , and fulfill other cash requirements . at year-end 2010 , our available borrowing capacity amounted to $ 2.831 billion and reflected borrowing capacity of $ 2.326 billion under our credit facility and our cash balance of $ 505 million . we calculate that borrowing capacity by taking $ 2.404 billion of effective aggregate bank commitments under our credit facility and subtracting $ 78 million of outstanding letters of credit under our credit facility . during 2010 , we repaid our outstanding credit facility borrowings and had no outstanding balance at year-end . as noted in the previous paragraphs , we anticipate that this available capacity will be adequate to fund our liquidity needs . since we continue to have ample flexibility under the credit facility 2019s covenants , we also expect that undrawn bank commitments under the credit facility will remain available to us even if business conditions were to deteriorate markedly . cash from operations cash from operations , depreciation expense , and amortization expense for the last three fiscal years are as follows : ( $ in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash from operations</td><td>$ 1151</td><td>$ 868</td><td>$ 641</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation expense</td><td>138</td><td>151</td><td>155</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amortization expense</td><td>40</td><td>34</td><td>35</td></tr></table> our ratio of current assets to current liabilities was roughly 1.4 to 1.0 at year-end 2010 and 1.2 to 1.0 at year-end 2009 . we minimize working capital through cash management , strict credit-granting policies , and aggressive collection efforts . we also have significant borrowing capacity under our credit facility should we need additional working capital. .
Question: what is the net change in cash from operations from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 227.0
Question: what is the cash from operations in 2008?
Answer: 641.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.35413
Question: what about the cash from operations in 2010?
Answer: 1151.0
Question: and in 2009?
Answer: 868.0
Question: what is the net change from 2009 to 2010?
| 283.0 |
CONVFINQA5508 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2010 , we granted 3.8 million rsus and 1.1 million employee sars . see footnote no . 4 , 201cshare-based compensation , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for additional information . new accounting standards see footnote no . 1 , 201csummary of significant accounting policies , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for information related to our adoption of new accounting standards in 2010 and for information on our anticipated adoption of recently issued accounting standards . liquidity and capital resources cash requirements and our credit facilities our credit facility , which expires on may 14 , 2012 , and associated letters of credit , provide for $ 2.4 billion of aggregate effective borrowings . borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus a fixed spread based on the credit ratings for our public debt . we also pay quarterly fees on the credit facility at a rate based on our public debt rating . for additional information on our credit facility , including participating financial institutions , see exhibit 10 , 201camended and restated credit agreement , 201d to our current report on form 8-k filed with the sec on may 16 , 2007 . although our credit facility does not expire until 2012 , we expect that we may extend or replace it during 2011 . the credit facility contains certain covenants , including a single financial covenant that limits our maximum leverage ( consisting of adjusted total debt to consolidated ebitda , each as defined in the credit facility ) to not more than 4 to 1 . our outstanding public debt does not contain a corresponding financial covenant or a requirement that we maintain certain financial ratios . we currently satisfy the covenants in our credit facility and public debt instruments , including the leverage covenant under the credit facility , and do not expect the covenants to restrict our ability to meet our anticipated borrowing and guarantee levels or increase those levels should we need to do so in the future . we believe the credit facility , together with cash we expect to generate from operations and our ability to raise capital , remains adequate to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements , finance our long-term growth plans , meet debt service , and fulfill other cash requirements . at year-end 2010 , our available borrowing capacity amounted to $ 2.831 billion and reflected borrowing capacity of $ 2.326 billion under our credit facility and our cash balance of $ 505 million . we calculate that borrowing capacity by taking $ 2.404 billion of effective aggregate bank commitments under our credit facility and subtracting $ 78 million of outstanding letters of credit under our credit facility . during 2010 , we repaid our outstanding credit facility borrowings and had no outstanding balance at year-end . as noted in the previous paragraphs , we anticipate that this available capacity will be adequate to fund our liquidity needs . since we continue to have ample flexibility under the credit facility 2019s covenants , we also expect that undrawn bank commitments under the credit facility will remain available to us even if business conditions were to deteriorate markedly . cash from operations cash from operations , depreciation expense , and amortization expense for the last three fiscal years are as follows : ( $ in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash from operations</td><td>$ 1151</td><td>$ 868</td><td>$ 641</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation expense</td><td>138</td><td>151</td><td>155</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amortization expense</td><td>40</td><td>34</td><td>35</td></tr></table> our ratio of current assets to current liabilities was roughly 1.4 to 1.0 at year-end 2010 and 1.2 to 1.0 at year-end 2009 . we minimize working capital through cash management , strict credit-granting policies , and aggressive collection efforts . we also have significant borrowing capacity under our credit facility should we need additional working capital. .
Question: what is the net change in cash from operations from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 227.0
Question: what is the cash from operations in 2008?
Answer: 641.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: 0.35413
Question: what about the cash from operations in 2010?
Answer: 1151.0
Question: and in 2009?
Answer: 868.0
Question: what is the net change from 2009 to 2010?
Answer: 283.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.32604 |
CONVFINQA5509 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
generate cash without additional external financings . free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions 2014 2013 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 7385</td><td>$ 6823</td><td>$ 6161</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-4249 ( 4249 )</td><td>-3405 ( 3405 )</td><td>-3633 ( 3633 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividends paid</td><td>-1632 ( 1632 )</td><td>-1333 ( 1333 )</td><td>-1146 ( 1146 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 1504</td><td>$ 2085</td><td>$ 1382</td></tr></table> 2015 outlook f0b7 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents : our employees , customers , shareholders and the communities we serve . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , training and employee engagement , and targeted capital investments . we will continue using and expanding the deployment of total safety culture and courage to care throughout our operations , which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety . we will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network . f0b7 network operations 2013 in 2015 , we will continue to add resources to support growth , improve service , and replenish our surge capability . f0b7 fuel prices 2013 with the dramatic drop in fuel prices at the end of 2014 , there is even more uncertainty around the projections of fuel prices . we again could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors . as prices fluctuate there will be a timing impact on earnings , as our fuel surcharge programs trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months . lower fuel prices could have a positive impact on the economy by increasing consumer discretionary spending that potentially could increase demand for various consumer products that we transport . alternatively , lower fuel prices will likely have a negative impact on other commodities such as coal , frac sand and crude oil shipments . f0b7 capital plan 2013 in 2015 , we expect our capital plan to be approximately $ 4.3 billion , including expenditures for ptc and 218 locomotives . the capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . ( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) f0b7 financial expectations 2013 we expect the overall u.s . economy to continue to improve at a moderate pace . one of the biggest uncertainties is the outlook for energy markets , which will bring both challenges and opportunities . on balance , we expect to see positive volume growth for 2015 versus the prior year . in the current environment , we expect continued margin improvement driven by continued pricing opportunities , ongoing productivity initiatives and the ability to leverage our resources as we improve the fluidity of our network. .
Question: what was free cash flow in 2014?
| 1504.0 |
CONVFINQA5510 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
generate cash without additional external financings . free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions 2014 2013 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 7385</td><td>$ 6823</td><td>$ 6161</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-4249 ( 4249 )</td><td>-3405 ( 3405 )</td><td>-3633 ( 3633 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividends paid</td><td>-1632 ( 1632 )</td><td>-1333 ( 1333 )</td><td>-1146 ( 1146 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 1504</td><td>$ 2085</td><td>$ 1382</td></tr></table> 2015 outlook f0b7 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents : our employees , customers , shareholders and the communities we serve . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , training and employee engagement , and targeted capital investments . we will continue using and expanding the deployment of total safety culture and courage to care throughout our operations , which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety . we will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network . f0b7 network operations 2013 in 2015 , we will continue to add resources to support growth , improve service , and replenish our surge capability . f0b7 fuel prices 2013 with the dramatic drop in fuel prices at the end of 2014 , there is even more uncertainty around the projections of fuel prices . we again could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors . as prices fluctuate there will be a timing impact on earnings , as our fuel surcharge programs trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months . lower fuel prices could have a positive impact on the economy by increasing consumer discretionary spending that potentially could increase demand for various consumer products that we transport . alternatively , lower fuel prices will likely have a negative impact on other commodities such as coal , frac sand and crude oil shipments . f0b7 capital plan 2013 in 2015 , we expect our capital plan to be approximately $ 4.3 billion , including expenditures for ptc and 218 locomotives . the capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . ( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) f0b7 financial expectations 2013 we expect the overall u.s . economy to continue to improve at a moderate pace . one of the biggest uncertainties is the outlook for energy markets , which will bring both challenges and opportunities . on balance , we expect to see positive volume growth for 2015 versus the prior year . in the current environment , we expect continued margin improvement driven by continued pricing opportunities , ongoing productivity initiatives and the ability to leverage our resources as we improve the fluidity of our network. .
Question: what was free cash flow in 2014?
Answer: 1504.0
Question: what was it in 2013?
| 2085.0 |
CONVFINQA5511 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
generate cash without additional external financings . free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions 2014 2013 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 7385</td><td>$ 6823</td><td>$ 6161</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-4249 ( 4249 )</td><td>-3405 ( 3405 )</td><td>-3633 ( 3633 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividends paid</td><td>-1632 ( 1632 )</td><td>-1333 ( 1333 )</td><td>-1146 ( 1146 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 1504</td><td>$ 2085</td><td>$ 1382</td></tr></table> 2015 outlook f0b7 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents : our employees , customers , shareholders and the communities we serve . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , training and employee engagement , and targeted capital investments . we will continue using and expanding the deployment of total safety culture and courage to care throughout our operations , which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety . we will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network . f0b7 network operations 2013 in 2015 , we will continue to add resources to support growth , improve service , and replenish our surge capability . f0b7 fuel prices 2013 with the dramatic drop in fuel prices at the end of 2014 , there is even more uncertainty around the projections of fuel prices . we again could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors . as prices fluctuate there will be a timing impact on earnings , as our fuel surcharge programs trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months . lower fuel prices could have a positive impact on the economy by increasing consumer discretionary spending that potentially could increase demand for various consumer products that we transport . alternatively , lower fuel prices will likely have a negative impact on other commodities such as coal , frac sand and crude oil shipments . f0b7 capital plan 2013 in 2015 , we expect our capital plan to be approximately $ 4.3 billion , including expenditures for ptc and 218 locomotives . the capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . ( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) f0b7 financial expectations 2013 we expect the overall u.s . economy to continue to improve at a moderate pace . one of the biggest uncertainties is the outlook for energy markets , which will bring both challenges and opportunities . on balance , we expect to see positive volume growth for 2015 versus the prior year . in the current environment , we expect continued margin improvement driven by continued pricing opportunities , ongoing productivity initiatives and the ability to leverage our resources as we improve the fluidity of our network. .
Question: what was free cash flow in 2014?
Answer: 1504.0
Question: what was it in 2013?
Answer: 2085.0
Question: what is the net change?
| -581.0 |
CONVFINQA5512 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
generate cash without additional external financings . free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions 2014 2013 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 7385</td><td>$ 6823</td><td>$ 6161</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-4249 ( 4249 )</td><td>-3405 ( 3405 )</td><td>-3633 ( 3633 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividends paid</td><td>-1632 ( 1632 )</td><td>-1333 ( 1333 )</td><td>-1146 ( 1146 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 1504</td><td>$ 2085</td><td>$ 1382</td></tr></table> 2015 outlook f0b7 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents : our employees , customers , shareholders and the communities we serve . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , training and employee engagement , and targeted capital investments . we will continue using and expanding the deployment of total safety culture and courage to care throughout our operations , which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety . we will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network . f0b7 network operations 2013 in 2015 , we will continue to add resources to support growth , improve service , and replenish our surge capability . f0b7 fuel prices 2013 with the dramatic drop in fuel prices at the end of 2014 , there is even more uncertainty around the projections of fuel prices . we again could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors . as prices fluctuate there will be a timing impact on earnings , as our fuel surcharge programs trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months . lower fuel prices could have a positive impact on the economy by increasing consumer discretionary spending that potentially could increase demand for various consumer products that we transport . alternatively , lower fuel prices will likely have a negative impact on other commodities such as coal , frac sand and crude oil shipments . f0b7 capital plan 2013 in 2015 , we expect our capital plan to be approximately $ 4.3 billion , including expenditures for ptc and 218 locomotives . the capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . ( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) f0b7 financial expectations 2013 we expect the overall u.s . economy to continue to improve at a moderate pace . one of the biggest uncertainties is the outlook for energy markets , which will bring both challenges and opportunities . on balance , we expect to see positive volume growth for 2015 versus the prior year . in the current environment , we expect continued margin improvement driven by continued pricing opportunities , ongoing productivity initiatives and the ability to leverage our resources as we improve the fluidity of our network. .
Question: what was free cash flow in 2014?
Answer: 1504.0
Question: what was it in 2013?
Answer: 2085.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -581.0
Question: what was the 2013 value?
| 2085.0 |
CONVFINQA5513 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
generate cash without additional external financings . free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions 2014 2013 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 7385</td><td>$ 6823</td><td>$ 6161</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-4249 ( 4249 )</td><td>-3405 ( 3405 )</td><td>-3633 ( 3633 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividends paid</td><td>-1632 ( 1632 )</td><td>-1333 ( 1333 )</td><td>-1146 ( 1146 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 1504</td><td>$ 2085</td><td>$ 1382</td></tr></table> 2015 outlook f0b7 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents : our employees , customers , shareholders and the communities we serve . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , training and employee engagement , and targeted capital investments . we will continue using and expanding the deployment of total safety culture and courage to care throughout our operations , which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety . we will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network . f0b7 network operations 2013 in 2015 , we will continue to add resources to support growth , improve service , and replenish our surge capability . f0b7 fuel prices 2013 with the dramatic drop in fuel prices at the end of 2014 , there is even more uncertainty around the projections of fuel prices . we again could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors . as prices fluctuate there will be a timing impact on earnings , as our fuel surcharge programs trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months . lower fuel prices could have a positive impact on the economy by increasing consumer discretionary spending that potentially could increase demand for various consumer products that we transport . alternatively , lower fuel prices will likely have a negative impact on other commodities such as coal , frac sand and crude oil shipments . f0b7 capital plan 2013 in 2015 , we expect our capital plan to be approximately $ 4.3 billion , including expenditures for ptc and 218 locomotives . the capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . ( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) f0b7 financial expectations 2013 we expect the overall u.s . economy to continue to improve at a moderate pace . one of the biggest uncertainties is the outlook for energy markets , which will bring both challenges and opportunities . on balance , we expect to see positive volume growth for 2015 versus the prior year . in the current environment , we expect continued margin improvement driven by continued pricing opportunities , ongoing productivity initiatives and the ability to leverage our resources as we improve the fluidity of our network. .
Question: what was free cash flow in 2014?
Answer: 1504.0
Question: what was it in 2013?
Answer: 2085.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -581.0
Question: what was the 2013 value?
Answer: 2085.0
Question: what is the net change over the 2013 value?
| -0.27866 |
CONVFINQA5514 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 3946111 $ 34.67 3608527 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 )</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>3946111</td><td>$ 34.67</td><td>3608527</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>3946111</td><td>$ 34.67</td><td>3608527</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 1166492 were subject to stock options , 2060138 were subject to outstanding restricted performance stock rights , 641556 were restricted stock rights , and 63033 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 9129 stock rights and 5763 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 1166492 outstanding stock options only . ( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .
Question: what is the number of shares issued times the price per share?
| 136811668.37 |
CONVFINQA5515 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 3946111 $ 34.67 3608527 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 )</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>3946111</td><td>$ 34.67</td><td>3608527</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>3946111</td><td>$ 34.67</td><td>3608527</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 1166492 were subject to stock options , 2060138 were subject to outstanding restricted performance stock rights , 641556 were restricted stock rights , and 63033 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 9129 stock rights and 5763 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 1166492 outstanding stock options only . ( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .
Question: what is the number of shares issued times the price per share?
Answer: 136811668.37
Question: what is that simplified?
| 0.13681 |
CONVFINQA5516 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
certain mortgage loans citigroup has elected the fair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for-sale . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>december 31 2009</td><td>december 31 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 3338</td><td>$ 4273</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principalbalance</td><td>55</td><td>138</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>4</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrualloans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>3</td><td>2</td></tr></table> the changes in fair values of these mortgage loans are reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . the changes in fair value during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 due to instrument-specific credit risk resulted in a $ 10 million loss and $ 32 million loss , respectively . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated statement of income . mortgage servicing rights the company accounts for mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value . fair value for msrs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach . this approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates . the model assumptions used in the valuation of msrs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates . the fair value of msrs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates . in managing this risk , the company hedges a significant portion of the values of its msrs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts , forward-purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities , and purchased securities classified as trading . see note 23 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of msrs . these msrs , which totaled $ 6.5 billion and $ 5.7 billion as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , are classified as mortgage servicing rights on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of msrs are recorded in commissions and fees in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . certain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates , inflation or currency risks ( 201cstructured liabilities 201d ) . the company elected the fair value option , because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair value basis . these positions will continue to be classified as debt , deposits or derivatives ( trading account liabilities ) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form . for those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value by $ 125 million and $ 671 million as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ( 201cnon-structured liabilities 201d ) . the company has elected the fair value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings . the election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications . these positions are reported in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . for those non-structured liabilities classified as short-term borrowings for which the fair value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 220 million as of december 31 , 2008 . for non-structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value by $ 1542 million and $ 856 million as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the fair value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment , as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value: .
Question: what was the aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance for the loans accounted for with the fair value option in 2009?
| 55.0 |
CONVFINQA5517 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
certain mortgage loans citigroup has elected the fair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for-sale . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>december 31 2009</td><td>december 31 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 3338</td><td>$ 4273</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principalbalance</td><td>55</td><td>138</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>4</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrualloans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>3</td><td>2</td></tr></table> the changes in fair values of these mortgage loans are reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . the changes in fair value during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 due to instrument-specific credit risk resulted in a $ 10 million loss and $ 32 million loss , respectively . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated statement of income . mortgage servicing rights the company accounts for mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value . fair value for msrs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach . this approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates . the model assumptions used in the valuation of msrs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates . the fair value of msrs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates . in managing this risk , the company hedges a significant portion of the values of its msrs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts , forward-purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities , and purchased securities classified as trading . see note 23 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of msrs . these msrs , which totaled $ 6.5 billion and $ 5.7 billion as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , are classified as mortgage servicing rights on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of msrs are recorded in commissions and fees in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . certain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates , inflation or currency risks ( 201cstructured liabilities 201d ) . the company elected the fair value option , because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair value basis . these positions will continue to be classified as debt , deposits or derivatives ( trading account liabilities ) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form . for those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value by $ 125 million and $ 671 million as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ( 201cnon-structured liabilities 201d ) . the company has elected the fair value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings . the election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications . these positions are reported in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . for those non-structured liabilities classified as short-term borrowings for which the fair value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 220 million as of december 31 , 2008 . for non-structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value by $ 1542 million and $ 856 million as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the fair value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment , as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value: .
Question: what was the aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance for the loans accounted for with the fair value option in 2009?
Answer: 55.0
Question: and what was it in 2008?
| 138.0 |
CONVFINQA5518 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
certain mortgage loans citigroup has elected the fair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for-sale . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>december 31 2009</td><td>december 31 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 3338</td><td>$ 4273</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principalbalance</td><td>55</td><td>138</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>4</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrualloans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>3</td><td>2</td></tr></table> the changes in fair values of these mortgage loans are reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . the changes in fair value during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 due to instrument-specific credit risk resulted in a $ 10 million loss and $ 32 million loss , respectively . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated statement of income . mortgage servicing rights the company accounts for mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value . fair value for msrs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach . this approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates . the model assumptions used in the valuation of msrs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates . the fair value of msrs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates . in managing this risk , the company hedges a significant portion of the values of its msrs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts , forward-purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities , and purchased securities classified as trading . see note 23 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of msrs . these msrs , which totaled $ 6.5 billion and $ 5.7 billion as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , are classified as mortgage servicing rights on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of msrs are recorded in commissions and fees in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . certain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates , inflation or currency risks ( 201cstructured liabilities 201d ) . the company elected the fair value option , because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair value basis . these positions will continue to be classified as debt , deposits or derivatives ( trading account liabilities ) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form . for those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value by $ 125 million and $ 671 million as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ( 201cnon-structured liabilities 201d ) . the company has elected the fair value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings . the election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications . these positions are reported in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . for those non-structured liabilities classified as short-term borrowings for which the fair value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 220 million as of december 31 , 2008 . for non-structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value by $ 1542 million and $ 856 million as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the fair value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment , as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value: .
Question: what was the aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance for the loans accounted for with the fair value option in 2009?
Answer: 55.0
Question: and what was it in 2008?
Answer: 138.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| -83.0 |
CONVFINQA5519 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
certain mortgage loans citigroup has elected the fair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for-sale . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>december 31 2009</td><td>december 31 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 3338</td><td>$ 4273</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principalbalance</td><td>55</td><td>138</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>4</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrualloans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>3</td><td>2</td></tr></table> the changes in fair values of these mortgage loans are reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . the changes in fair value during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 due to instrument-specific credit risk resulted in a $ 10 million loss and $ 32 million loss , respectively . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated statement of income . mortgage servicing rights the company accounts for mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value . fair value for msrs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach . this approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates . the model assumptions used in the valuation of msrs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates . the fair value of msrs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates . in managing this risk , the company hedges a significant portion of the values of its msrs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts , forward-purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities , and purchased securities classified as trading . see note 23 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of msrs . these msrs , which totaled $ 6.5 billion and $ 5.7 billion as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , are classified as mortgage servicing rights on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of msrs are recorded in commissions and fees in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . certain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates , inflation or currency risks ( 201cstructured liabilities 201d ) . the company elected the fair value option , because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair value basis . these positions will continue to be classified as debt , deposits or derivatives ( trading account liabilities ) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form . for those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value by $ 125 million and $ 671 million as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ( 201cnon-structured liabilities 201d ) . the company has elected the fair value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings . the election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications . these positions are reported in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . for those non-structured liabilities classified as short-term borrowings for which the fair value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 220 million as of december 31 , 2008 . for non-structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value by $ 1542 million and $ 856 million as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the fair value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment , as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value: .
Question: what was the aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance for the loans accounted for with the fair value option in 2009?
Answer: 55.0
Question: and what was it in 2008?
Answer: 138.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: -83.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2008 aggregate fair value, in percentage?
| -0.60145 |
CONVFINQA5520 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
for the year ended december 31 , 2005 , we realized net losses of $ 1 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 1 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2004 , net of deferred taxes of less than $ 1 million , related to these sales . for the year ended december 31 , 2004 , we realized net gains of $ 26 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 11 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2003 , net of deferred taxes of $ 7 million , related to these sales . note 13 . equity-based compensation the 2006 equity incentive plan was approved by shareholders in april 2006 , and 20000000 shares of common stock were approved for issuance for stock and stock-based awards , including stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock , deferred stock and performance awards . in addition , up to 8000000 shares from our 1997 equity incentive plan , that were available to issue or become available due to cancellations and forfeitures , may be awarded under the 2006 plan . the 1997 plan expired on december 18 , 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , 1305420 shares from the 1997 plan have been added to and may be awarded from the 2006 plan . as of december 31 , 2006 , 106045 awards have been made under the 2006 plan . we have stock options outstanding from previous plans , including the 1997 plan , under which no further grants can be made . the exercise price of non-qualified and incentive stock options and stock appreciation rights may not be less than the fair value of such shares at the date of grant . stock options and stock appreciation rights issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan generally vest over four years and expire no later than ten years from the date of grant . for restricted stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , stock certificates are issued at the time of grant and recipients have dividend and voting rights . in general , these grants vest over three years . for deferred stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , no stock is issued at the time of grant . generally , these grants vest over two- , three- or four-year periods . performance awards granted under the 2006 equity incentive plan and the prior 1997 plan are earned over a performance period based on achievement of goals , generally over two- to three- year periods . payment for performance awards is made in shares of our common stock or in cash equal to the fair market value of our common stock , based on certain financial ratios after the conclusion of each performance period . we record compensation expense , equal to the estimated fair value of the options on the grant date , on a straight-line basis over the options 2019 vesting period . we use a black-scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of the options granted . the weighted-average assumptions used in connection with the option-pricing model were as follows for the years indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % )</td><td>1.85% ( 1.85 % )</td><td>1.35% ( 1.35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>26.50</td><td>28.70</td><td>27.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>4.60</td><td>4.19</td><td>3.02</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected option lives ( in years )</td><td>7.8</td><td>7.8</td><td>5.0</td></tr></table> compensation expense related to stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock awards , deferred stock awards and performance awards , which we record as a component of salaries and employee benefits expense in our consolidated statement of income , was $ 208 million , $ 110 million and $ 74 million for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the related total income tax benefit recorded in our consolidated statement of income was $ 83 million , $ 44 million and $ 30 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . seq 87 copyarea : 38 . x 54 . trimsize : 8.25 x 10.75 typeset state street corporation serverprocess c:\\fc\\delivery_1024177\\2771-1-do_p.pdf chksum : 0 cycle 1merrill corporation 07-2771-1 thu mar 01 17:11:13 2007 ( v 2.247w--stp1pae18 ) .
Question: what was the net change in the value of employee benefit expense from 2004 to 2006?
| 134.0 |
CONVFINQA5521 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
for the year ended december 31 , 2005 , we realized net losses of $ 1 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 1 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2004 , net of deferred taxes of less than $ 1 million , related to these sales . for the year ended december 31 , 2004 , we realized net gains of $ 26 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 11 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2003 , net of deferred taxes of $ 7 million , related to these sales . note 13 . equity-based compensation the 2006 equity incentive plan was approved by shareholders in april 2006 , and 20000000 shares of common stock were approved for issuance for stock and stock-based awards , including stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock , deferred stock and performance awards . in addition , up to 8000000 shares from our 1997 equity incentive plan , that were available to issue or become available due to cancellations and forfeitures , may be awarded under the 2006 plan . the 1997 plan expired on december 18 , 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , 1305420 shares from the 1997 plan have been added to and may be awarded from the 2006 plan . as of december 31 , 2006 , 106045 awards have been made under the 2006 plan . we have stock options outstanding from previous plans , including the 1997 plan , under which no further grants can be made . the exercise price of non-qualified and incentive stock options and stock appreciation rights may not be less than the fair value of such shares at the date of grant . stock options and stock appreciation rights issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan generally vest over four years and expire no later than ten years from the date of grant . for restricted stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , stock certificates are issued at the time of grant and recipients have dividend and voting rights . in general , these grants vest over three years . for deferred stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , no stock is issued at the time of grant . generally , these grants vest over two- , three- or four-year periods . performance awards granted under the 2006 equity incentive plan and the prior 1997 plan are earned over a performance period based on achievement of goals , generally over two- to three- year periods . payment for performance awards is made in shares of our common stock or in cash equal to the fair market value of our common stock , based on certain financial ratios after the conclusion of each performance period . we record compensation expense , equal to the estimated fair value of the options on the grant date , on a straight-line basis over the options 2019 vesting period . we use a black-scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of the options granted . the weighted-average assumptions used in connection with the option-pricing model were as follows for the years indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % )</td><td>1.85% ( 1.85 % )</td><td>1.35% ( 1.35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>26.50</td><td>28.70</td><td>27.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>4.60</td><td>4.19</td><td>3.02</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected option lives ( in years )</td><td>7.8</td><td>7.8</td><td>5.0</td></tr></table> compensation expense related to stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock awards , deferred stock awards and performance awards , which we record as a component of salaries and employee benefits expense in our consolidated statement of income , was $ 208 million , $ 110 million and $ 74 million for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the related total income tax benefit recorded in our consolidated statement of income was $ 83 million , $ 44 million and $ 30 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . seq 87 copyarea : 38 . x 54 . trimsize : 8.25 x 10.75 typeset state street corporation serverprocess c:\\fc\\delivery_1024177\\2771-1-do_p.pdf chksum : 0 cycle 1merrill corporation 07-2771-1 thu mar 01 17:11:13 2007 ( v 2.247w--stp1pae18 ) .
Question: what was the net change in the value of employee benefit expense from 2004 to 2006?
Answer: 134.0
Question: what is that net change over the 2004 value?
| 1.81081 |
CONVFINQA5522 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
recognition of deferred revenue related to sanofi-aventis 2019 $ 85.0 million up-front payment decreased in 2010 compared to 2009 due to the november 2009 amendments to expand and extend the companies 2019 antibody collaboration . in connection with the november 2009 amendment of the discovery agreement , sanofi-aventis is funding up to $ 30 million of agreed-upon costs incurred by us to expand our manufacturing capacity at our rensselaer , new york facilities , of which $ 23.4 million was received or receivable from sanofi-aventis as of december 31 , 2010 . revenue related to these payments for such funding from sanofi-aventis is deferred and recognized as collaboration revenue prospectively over the related performance period in conjunction with the recognition of the original $ 85.0 million up-front payment . as of december 31 , 2010 , $ 79.8 million of the sanofi-aventis payments was deferred and will be recognized as revenue in future periods . in august 2008 , we entered into a separate velocigene ae agreement with sanofi-aventis . in 2010 and 2009 , we recognized $ 1.6 million and $ 2.7 million , respectively , in revenue related to this agreement . bayer healthcare collaboration revenue the collaboration revenue we earned from bayer healthcare , as detailed below , consisted of cost sharing of regeneron vegf trap-eye development expenses , substantive performance milestone payments , and recognition of revenue related to a non-refundable $ 75.0 million up-front payment received in october 2006 and a $ 20.0 million milestone payment received in august 2007 ( which , for the purpose of revenue recognition , was not considered substantive ) . years ended bayer healthcare collaboration revenue december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>bayer healthcare collaboration revenue</td><td>bayer healthcare collaboration revenue</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost-sharing of regeneron vegf trap-eye development expenses</td><td>$ 45.5</td><td>$ 37.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>substantive performance milestone payments</td><td>20.0</td><td>20.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>recognition of deferred revenue related to up-front and other milestone payments</td><td>9.9</td><td>9.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total bayer healthcare collaboration revenue</td><td>$ 75.4</td><td>$ 67.3</td></tr></table> cost-sharing of our vegf trap-eye development expenses with bayer healthcare increased in 2010 compared to 2009 due to higher internal development activities and higher clinical development costs in connection with our phase 3 copernicus trial in crvo . in the fourth quarter of 2010 , we earned two $ 10.0 million substantive milestone payments from bayer healthcare for achieving positive 52-week results in the view 1 study and positive 6-month results in the copernicus study . in july 2009 , we earned a $ 20.0 million substantive performance milestone payment from bayer healthcare in connection with the dosing of the first patient in the copernicus study . in connection with the recognition of deferred revenue related to the $ 75.0 million up-front payment and $ 20.0 million milestone payment received in august 2007 , as of december 31 , 2010 , $ 47.0 million of these payments was deferred and will be recognized as revenue in future periods . technology licensing revenue in connection with our velocimmune ae license agreements with astrazeneca and astellas , each of the $ 20.0 million annual , non-refundable payments were deferred upon receipt and recognized as revenue ratably over approximately the ensuing year of each agreement . in both 2010 and 2009 , we recognized $ 40.0 million of technology licensing revenue related to these agreements . in addition , in connection with the amendment and extension of our license agreement with astellas , in august 2010 , we received a $ 165.0 million up-front payment , which was deferred upon receipt and will be recognized as revenue ratably over a seven-year period beginning in mid-2011 . as of december 31 , 2010 , $ 176.6 million of these technology licensing payments was deferred and will be recognized as revenue in future periods . net product sales in 2010 and 2009 , we recognized as revenue $ 25.3 million and $ 18.4 million , respectively , of arcalyst ae net product sales for which both the right of return no longer existed and rebates could be reasonably estimated . the company had limited historical return experience for arcalyst ae beginning with initial sales in 2008 through the end of 2009 ; therefore , arcalyst ae net product sales were deferred until the right of return no longer existed and rebates could be reasonably estimated . effective in the first quarter of 2010 , the company determined that it had .
Question: what is the recognized revenue in 2010, in millions?
| 25.3 |
CONVFINQA5523 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
recognition of deferred revenue related to sanofi-aventis 2019 $ 85.0 million up-front payment decreased in 2010 compared to 2009 due to the november 2009 amendments to expand and extend the companies 2019 antibody collaboration . in connection with the november 2009 amendment of the discovery agreement , sanofi-aventis is funding up to $ 30 million of agreed-upon costs incurred by us to expand our manufacturing capacity at our rensselaer , new york facilities , of which $ 23.4 million was received or receivable from sanofi-aventis as of december 31 , 2010 . revenue related to these payments for such funding from sanofi-aventis is deferred and recognized as collaboration revenue prospectively over the related performance period in conjunction with the recognition of the original $ 85.0 million up-front payment . as of december 31 , 2010 , $ 79.8 million of the sanofi-aventis payments was deferred and will be recognized as revenue in future periods . in august 2008 , we entered into a separate velocigene ae agreement with sanofi-aventis . in 2010 and 2009 , we recognized $ 1.6 million and $ 2.7 million , respectively , in revenue related to this agreement . bayer healthcare collaboration revenue the collaboration revenue we earned from bayer healthcare , as detailed below , consisted of cost sharing of regeneron vegf trap-eye development expenses , substantive performance milestone payments , and recognition of revenue related to a non-refundable $ 75.0 million up-front payment received in october 2006 and a $ 20.0 million milestone payment received in august 2007 ( which , for the purpose of revenue recognition , was not considered substantive ) . years ended bayer healthcare collaboration revenue december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>bayer healthcare collaboration revenue</td><td>bayer healthcare collaboration revenue</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost-sharing of regeneron vegf trap-eye development expenses</td><td>$ 45.5</td><td>$ 37.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>substantive performance milestone payments</td><td>20.0</td><td>20.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>recognition of deferred revenue related to up-front and other milestone payments</td><td>9.9</td><td>9.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total bayer healthcare collaboration revenue</td><td>$ 75.4</td><td>$ 67.3</td></tr></table> cost-sharing of our vegf trap-eye development expenses with bayer healthcare increased in 2010 compared to 2009 due to higher internal development activities and higher clinical development costs in connection with our phase 3 copernicus trial in crvo . in the fourth quarter of 2010 , we earned two $ 10.0 million substantive milestone payments from bayer healthcare for achieving positive 52-week results in the view 1 study and positive 6-month results in the copernicus study . in july 2009 , we earned a $ 20.0 million substantive performance milestone payment from bayer healthcare in connection with the dosing of the first patient in the copernicus study . in connection with the recognition of deferred revenue related to the $ 75.0 million up-front payment and $ 20.0 million milestone payment received in august 2007 , as of december 31 , 2010 , $ 47.0 million of these payments was deferred and will be recognized as revenue in future periods . technology licensing revenue in connection with our velocimmune ae license agreements with astrazeneca and astellas , each of the $ 20.0 million annual , non-refundable payments were deferred upon receipt and recognized as revenue ratably over approximately the ensuing year of each agreement . in both 2010 and 2009 , we recognized $ 40.0 million of technology licensing revenue related to these agreements . in addition , in connection with the amendment and extension of our license agreement with astellas , in august 2010 , we received a $ 165.0 million up-front payment , which was deferred upon receipt and will be recognized as revenue ratably over a seven-year period beginning in mid-2011 . as of december 31 , 2010 , $ 176.6 million of these technology licensing payments was deferred and will be recognized as revenue in future periods . net product sales in 2010 and 2009 , we recognized as revenue $ 25.3 million and $ 18.4 million , respectively , of arcalyst ae net product sales for which both the right of return no longer existed and rebates could be reasonably estimated . the company had limited historical return experience for arcalyst ae beginning with initial sales in 2008 through the end of 2009 ; therefore , arcalyst ae net product sales were deferred until the right of return no longer existed and rebates could be reasonably estimated . effective in the first quarter of 2010 , the company determined that it had .
Question: what is the recognized revenue in 2010, in millions?
Answer: 25.3
Question: what about in 2009, in millions?
| 18.4 |
CONVFINQA5524 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
recognition of deferred revenue related to sanofi-aventis 2019 $ 85.0 million up-front payment decreased in 2010 compared to 2009 due to the november 2009 amendments to expand and extend the companies 2019 antibody collaboration . in connection with the november 2009 amendment of the discovery agreement , sanofi-aventis is funding up to $ 30 million of agreed-upon costs incurred by us to expand our manufacturing capacity at our rensselaer , new york facilities , of which $ 23.4 million was received or receivable from sanofi-aventis as of december 31 , 2010 . revenue related to these payments for such funding from sanofi-aventis is deferred and recognized as collaboration revenue prospectively over the related performance period in conjunction with the recognition of the original $ 85.0 million up-front payment . as of december 31 , 2010 , $ 79.8 million of the sanofi-aventis payments was deferred and will be recognized as revenue in future periods . in august 2008 , we entered into a separate velocigene ae agreement with sanofi-aventis . in 2010 and 2009 , we recognized $ 1.6 million and $ 2.7 million , respectively , in revenue related to this agreement . bayer healthcare collaboration revenue the collaboration revenue we earned from bayer healthcare , as detailed below , consisted of cost sharing of regeneron vegf trap-eye development expenses , substantive performance milestone payments , and recognition of revenue related to a non-refundable $ 75.0 million up-front payment received in october 2006 and a $ 20.0 million milestone payment received in august 2007 ( which , for the purpose of revenue recognition , was not considered substantive ) . years ended bayer healthcare collaboration revenue december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>bayer healthcare collaboration revenue</td><td>bayer healthcare collaboration revenue</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost-sharing of regeneron vegf trap-eye development expenses</td><td>$ 45.5</td><td>$ 37.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>substantive performance milestone payments</td><td>20.0</td><td>20.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>recognition of deferred revenue related to up-front and other milestone payments</td><td>9.9</td><td>9.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total bayer healthcare collaboration revenue</td><td>$ 75.4</td><td>$ 67.3</td></tr></table> cost-sharing of our vegf trap-eye development expenses with bayer healthcare increased in 2010 compared to 2009 due to higher internal development activities and higher clinical development costs in connection with our phase 3 copernicus trial in crvo . in the fourth quarter of 2010 , we earned two $ 10.0 million substantive milestone payments from bayer healthcare for achieving positive 52-week results in the view 1 study and positive 6-month results in the copernicus study . in july 2009 , we earned a $ 20.0 million substantive performance milestone payment from bayer healthcare in connection with the dosing of the first patient in the copernicus study . in connection with the recognition of deferred revenue related to the $ 75.0 million up-front payment and $ 20.0 million milestone payment received in august 2007 , as of december 31 , 2010 , $ 47.0 million of these payments was deferred and will be recognized as revenue in future periods . technology licensing revenue in connection with our velocimmune ae license agreements with astrazeneca and astellas , each of the $ 20.0 million annual , non-refundable payments were deferred upon receipt and recognized as revenue ratably over approximately the ensuing year of each agreement . in both 2010 and 2009 , we recognized $ 40.0 million of technology licensing revenue related to these agreements . in addition , in connection with the amendment and extension of our license agreement with astellas , in august 2010 , we received a $ 165.0 million up-front payment , which was deferred upon receipt and will be recognized as revenue ratably over a seven-year period beginning in mid-2011 . as of december 31 , 2010 , $ 176.6 million of these technology licensing payments was deferred and will be recognized as revenue in future periods . net product sales in 2010 and 2009 , we recognized as revenue $ 25.3 million and $ 18.4 million , respectively , of arcalyst ae net product sales for which both the right of return no longer existed and rebates could be reasonably estimated . the company had limited historical return experience for arcalyst ae beginning with initial sales in 2008 through the end of 2009 ; therefore , arcalyst ae net product sales were deferred until the right of return no longer existed and rebates could be reasonably estimated . effective in the first quarter of 2010 , the company determined that it had .
Question: what is the recognized revenue in 2010, in millions?
Answer: 25.3
Question: what about in 2009, in millions?
Answer: 18.4
Question: what is the net increase?
| 43.7 |
CONVFINQA5525 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
recognition of deferred revenue related to sanofi-aventis 2019 $ 85.0 million up-front payment decreased in 2010 compared to 2009 due to the november 2009 amendments to expand and extend the companies 2019 antibody collaboration . in connection with the november 2009 amendment of the discovery agreement , sanofi-aventis is funding up to $ 30 million of agreed-upon costs incurred by us to expand our manufacturing capacity at our rensselaer , new york facilities , of which $ 23.4 million was received or receivable from sanofi-aventis as of december 31 , 2010 . revenue related to these payments for such funding from sanofi-aventis is deferred and recognized as collaboration revenue prospectively over the related performance period in conjunction with the recognition of the original $ 85.0 million up-front payment . as of december 31 , 2010 , $ 79.8 million of the sanofi-aventis payments was deferred and will be recognized as revenue in future periods . in august 2008 , we entered into a separate velocigene ae agreement with sanofi-aventis . in 2010 and 2009 , we recognized $ 1.6 million and $ 2.7 million , respectively , in revenue related to this agreement . bayer healthcare collaboration revenue the collaboration revenue we earned from bayer healthcare , as detailed below , consisted of cost sharing of regeneron vegf trap-eye development expenses , substantive performance milestone payments , and recognition of revenue related to a non-refundable $ 75.0 million up-front payment received in october 2006 and a $ 20.0 million milestone payment received in august 2007 ( which , for the purpose of revenue recognition , was not considered substantive ) . years ended bayer healthcare collaboration revenue december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>bayer healthcare collaboration revenue</td><td>bayer healthcare collaboration revenue</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost-sharing of regeneron vegf trap-eye development expenses</td><td>$ 45.5</td><td>$ 37.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>substantive performance milestone payments</td><td>20.0</td><td>20.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>recognition of deferred revenue related to up-front and other milestone payments</td><td>9.9</td><td>9.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total bayer healthcare collaboration revenue</td><td>$ 75.4</td><td>$ 67.3</td></tr></table> cost-sharing of our vegf trap-eye development expenses with bayer healthcare increased in 2010 compared to 2009 due to higher internal development activities and higher clinical development costs in connection with our phase 3 copernicus trial in crvo . in the fourth quarter of 2010 , we earned two $ 10.0 million substantive milestone payments from bayer healthcare for achieving positive 52-week results in the view 1 study and positive 6-month results in the copernicus study . in july 2009 , we earned a $ 20.0 million substantive performance milestone payment from bayer healthcare in connection with the dosing of the first patient in the copernicus study . in connection with the recognition of deferred revenue related to the $ 75.0 million up-front payment and $ 20.0 million milestone payment received in august 2007 , as of december 31 , 2010 , $ 47.0 million of these payments was deferred and will be recognized as revenue in future periods . technology licensing revenue in connection with our velocimmune ae license agreements with astrazeneca and astellas , each of the $ 20.0 million annual , non-refundable payments were deferred upon receipt and recognized as revenue ratably over approximately the ensuing year of each agreement . in both 2010 and 2009 , we recognized $ 40.0 million of technology licensing revenue related to these agreements . in addition , in connection with the amendment and extension of our license agreement with astellas , in august 2010 , we received a $ 165.0 million up-front payment , which was deferred upon receipt and will be recognized as revenue ratably over a seven-year period beginning in mid-2011 . as of december 31 , 2010 , $ 176.6 million of these technology licensing payments was deferred and will be recognized as revenue in future periods . net product sales in 2010 and 2009 , we recognized as revenue $ 25.3 million and $ 18.4 million , respectively , of arcalyst ae net product sales for which both the right of return no longer existed and rebates could be reasonably estimated . the company had limited historical return experience for arcalyst ae beginning with initial sales in 2008 through the end of 2009 ; therefore , arcalyst ae net product sales were deferred until the right of return no longer existed and rebates could be reasonably estimated . effective in the first quarter of 2010 , the company determined that it had .
Question: what is the recognized revenue in 2010, in millions?
Answer: 25.3
Question: what about in 2009, in millions?
Answer: 18.4
Question: what is the net increase?
Answer: 43.7
Question: what about in dollars?
| 43700000.0 |
CONVFINQA5526 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) debt maturities as of december 31 , 2015 , excluding premiums and discounts , are as follows ( millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 976</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>875</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>1100</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>414</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>9763</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 13128</td></tr></table> credit lines devon has a $ 3.0 billion senior credit facility . the maturity date for $ 30 million of the senior credit facility is october 24 , 2017 . the maturity date for $ 164 million of the senior credit facility is october 24 , 2018 . the maturity date for the remaining $ 2.8 billion is october 24 , 2019 . amounts borrowed under the senior credit facility may , at the election of devon , bear interest at various fixed rate options for periods of up to twelve months . such rates are generally less than the prime rate . however , devon may elect to borrow at the prime rate . the senior credit facility currently provides for an annual facility fee of $ 3.8 million that is payable quarterly in arrears . as of december 31 , 2015 , there were no borrowings under the senior credit facility . the senior credit facility contains only one material financial covenant . this covenant requires devon 2019s ratio of total funded debt to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , to be no greater than 65% ( 65 % ) . the credit agreement contains definitions of total funded debt and total capitalization that include adjustments to the respective amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements . also , total capitalization is adjusted to add back noncash financial write-downs such as full cost ceiling impairments or goodwill impairments . as of december 31 , 2015 , devon was in compliance with this covenant with a debt-to- capitalization ratio of 23.7% ( 23.7 % ) . commercial paper devon 2019s senior credit facility supports its $ 3.0 billion of short-term credit under its commercial paper program . commercial paper debt generally has a maturity of between 1 and 90 days , although it can have a maturity of up to 365 days , and bears interest at rates agreed to at the time of the borrowing . the interest rate is generally based on a standard index such as the federal funds rate , libor or the money market rate as found in the commercial paper market . as of december 31 , 2015 , devon 2019s outstanding commercial paper borrowings had a weighted-average borrowing rate of 0.63% ( 0.63 % ) . issuance of senior notes in june 2015 , devon issued $ 750 million of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) senior notes due 2045 that are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . devon used the net proceeds to repay the floating rate senior notes that matured on december 15 , 2015 , as well as outstanding commercial paper balances . in december 2015 , in conjunction with the announcement of the powder river basin and stack acquisitions , devon issued $ 850 million of 5.85% ( 5.85 % ) senior notes due 2025 that are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . devon used the net proceeds to fund the cash portion of these acquisitions. .
Question: as of 2015, what was the amount of the notes issued maturing in 2045?
| 850.0 |
CONVFINQA5527 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) debt maturities as of december 31 , 2015 , excluding premiums and discounts , are as follows ( millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 976</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>875</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>1100</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>414</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>9763</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 13128</td></tr></table> credit lines devon has a $ 3.0 billion senior credit facility . the maturity date for $ 30 million of the senior credit facility is october 24 , 2017 . the maturity date for $ 164 million of the senior credit facility is october 24 , 2018 . the maturity date for the remaining $ 2.8 billion is october 24 , 2019 . amounts borrowed under the senior credit facility may , at the election of devon , bear interest at various fixed rate options for periods of up to twelve months . such rates are generally less than the prime rate . however , devon may elect to borrow at the prime rate . the senior credit facility currently provides for an annual facility fee of $ 3.8 million that is payable quarterly in arrears . as of december 31 , 2015 , there were no borrowings under the senior credit facility . the senior credit facility contains only one material financial covenant . this covenant requires devon 2019s ratio of total funded debt to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , to be no greater than 65% ( 65 % ) . the credit agreement contains definitions of total funded debt and total capitalization that include adjustments to the respective amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements . also , total capitalization is adjusted to add back noncash financial write-downs such as full cost ceiling impairments or goodwill impairments . as of december 31 , 2015 , devon was in compliance with this covenant with a debt-to- capitalization ratio of 23.7% ( 23.7 % ) . commercial paper devon 2019s senior credit facility supports its $ 3.0 billion of short-term credit under its commercial paper program . commercial paper debt generally has a maturity of between 1 and 90 days , although it can have a maturity of up to 365 days , and bears interest at rates agreed to at the time of the borrowing . the interest rate is generally based on a standard index such as the federal funds rate , libor or the money market rate as found in the commercial paper market . as of december 31 , 2015 , devon 2019s outstanding commercial paper borrowings had a weighted-average borrowing rate of 0.63% ( 0.63 % ) . issuance of senior notes in june 2015 , devon issued $ 750 million of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) senior notes due 2045 that are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . devon used the net proceeds to repay the floating rate senior notes that matured on december 15 , 2015 , as well as outstanding commercial paper balances . in december 2015 , in conjunction with the announcement of the powder river basin and stack acquisitions , devon issued $ 850 million of 5.85% ( 5.85 % ) senior notes due 2025 that are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . devon used the net proceeds to fund the cash portion of these acquisitions. .
Question: as of 2015, what was the amount of the notes issued maturing in 2045?
Answer: 850.0
Question: and what was it for the ones maturing in 2025?
| 750.0 |
CONVFINQA5528 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) debt maturities as of december 31 , 2015 , excluding premiums and discounts , are as follows ( millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 976</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>875</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>1100</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>414</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>9763</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 13128</td></tr></table> credit lines devon has a $ 3.0 billion senior credit facility . the maturity date for $ 30 million of the senior credit facility is october 24 , 2017 . the maturity date for $ 164 million of the senior credit facility is october 24 , 2018 . the maturity date for the remaining $ 2.8 billion is october 24 , 2019 . amounts borrowed under the senior credit facility may , at the election of devon , bear interest at various fixed rate options for periods of up to twelve months . such rates are generally less than the prime rate . however , devon may elect to borrow at the prime rate . the senior credit facility currently provides for an annual facility fee of $ 3.8 million that is payable quarterly in arrears . as of december 31 , 2015 , there were no borrowings under the senior credit facility . the senior credit facility contains only one material financial covenant . this covenant requires devon 2019s ratio of total funded debt to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , to be no greater than 65% ( 65 % ) . the credit agreement contains definitions of total funded debt and total capitalization that include adjustments to the respective amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements . also , total capitalization is adjusted to add back noncash financial write-downs such as full cost ceiling impairments or goodwill impairments . as of december 31 , 2015 , devon was in compliance with this covenant with a debt-to- capitalization ratio of 23.7% ( 23.7 % ) . commercial paper devon 2019s senior credit facility supports its $ 3.0 billion of short-term credit under its commercial paper program . commercial paper debt generally has a maturity of between 1 and 90 days , although it can have a maturity of up to 365 days , and bears interest at rates agreed to at the time of the borrowing . the interest rate is generally based on a standard index such as the federal funds rate , libor or the money market rate as found in the commercial paper market . as of december 31 , 2015 , devon 2019s outstanding commercial paper borrowings had a weighted-average borrowing rate of 0.63% ( 0.63 % ) . issuance of senior notes in june 2015 , devon issued $ 750 million of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) senior notes due 2045 that are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . devon used the net proceeds to repay the floating rate senior notes that matured on december 15 , 2015 , as well as outstanding commercial paper balances . in december 2015 , in conjunction with the announcement of the powder river basin and stack acquisitions , devon issued $ 850 million of 5.85% ( 5.85 % ) senior notes due 2025 that are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . devon used the net proceeds to fund the cash portion of these acquisitions. .
Question: as of 2015, what was the amount of the notes issued maturing in 2045?
Answer: 850.0
Question: and what was it for the ones maturing in 2025?
Answer: 750.0
Question: how much, then, did the 2045 amount represent in relation to this 2025 one?
| 1.13333 |
CONVFINQA5529 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) debt maturities as of december 31 , 2015 , excluding premiums and discounts , are as follows ( millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 976</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>875</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>1100</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>414</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>9763</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 13128</td></tr></table> credit lines devon has a $ 3.0 billion senior credit facility . the maturity date for $ 30 million of the senior credit facility is october 24 , 2017 . the maturity date for $ 164 million of the senior credit facility is october 24 , 2018 . the maturity date for the remaining $ 2.8 billion is october 24 , 2019 . amounts borrowed under the senior credit facility may , at the election of devon , bear interest at various fixed rate options for periods of up to twelve months . such rates are generally less than the prime rate . however , devon may elect to borrow at the prime rate . the senior credit facility currently provides for an annual facility fee of $ 3.8 million that is payable quarterly in arrears . as of december 31 , 2015 , there were no borrowings under the senior credit facility . the senior credit facility contains only one material financial covenant . this covenant requires devon 2019s ratio of total funded debt to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , to be no greater than 65% ( 65 % ) . the credit agreement contains definitions of total funded debt and total capitalization that include adjustments to the respective amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements . also , total capitalization is adjusted to add back noncash financial write-downs such as full cost ceiling impairments or goodwill impairments . as of december 31 , 2015 , devon was in compliance with this covenant with a debt-to- capitalization ratio of 23.7% ( 23.7 % ) . commercial paper devon 2019s senior credit facility supports its $ 3.0 billion of short-term credit under its commercial paper program . commercial paper debt generally has a maturity of between 1 and 90 days , although it can have a maturity of up to 365 days , and bears interest at rates agreed to at the time of the borrowing . the interest rate is generally based on a standard index such as the federal funds rate , libor or the money market rate as found in the commercial paper market . as of december 31 , 2015 , devon 2019s outstanding commercial paper borrowings had a weighted-average borrowing rate of 0.63% ( 0.63 % ) . issuance of senior notes in june 2015 , devon issued $ 750 million of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) senior notes due 2045 that are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . devon used the net proceeds to repay the floating rate senior notes that matured on december 15 , 2015 , as well as outstanding commercial paper balances . in december 2015 , in conjunction with the announcement of the powder river basin and stack acquisitions , devon issued $ 850 million of 5.85% ( 5.85 % ) senior notes due 2025 that are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . devon used the net proceeds to fund the cash portion of these acquisitions. .
Question: as of 2015, what was the amount of the notes issued maturing in 2045?
Answer: 850.0
Question: and what was it for the ones maturing in 2025?
Answer: 750.0
Question: how much, then, did the 2045 amount represent in relation to this 2025 one?
Answer: 1.13333
Question: and concerning the debt maturities, what was their maximum value between the year of 2018 to 2020?
| 1100.0 |
CONVFINQA5530 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) debt maturities as of december 31 , 2015 , excluding premiums and discounts , are as follows ( millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 976</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>875</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>1100</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>414</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>9763</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 13128</td></tr></table> credit lines devon has a $ 3.0 billion senior credit facility . the maturity date for $ 30 million of the senior credit facility is october 24 , 2017 . the maturity date for $ 164 million of the senior credit facility is october 24 , 2018 . the maturity date for the remaining $ 2.8 billion is october 24 , 2019 . amounts borrowed under the senior credit facility may , at the election of devon , bear interest at various fixed rate options for periods of up to twelve months . such rates are generally less than the prime rate . however , devon may elect to borrow at the prime rate . the senior credit facility currently provides for an annual facility fee of $ 3.8 million that is payable quarterly in arrears . as of december 31 , 2015 , there were no borrowings under the senior credit facility . the senior credit facility contains only one material financial covenant . this covenant requires devon 2019s ratio of total funded debt to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , to be no greater than 65% ( 65 % ) . the credit agreement contains definitions of total funded debt and total capitalization that include adjustments to the respective amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements . also , total capitalization is adjusted to add back noncash financial write-downs such as full cost ceiling impairments or goodwill impairments . as of december 31 , 2015 , devon was in compliance with this covenant with a debt-to- capitalization ratio of 23.7% ( 23.7 % ) . commercial paper devon 2019s senior credit facility supports its $ 3.0 billion of short-term credit under its commercial paper program . commercial paper debt generally has a maturity of between 1 and 90 days , although it can have a maturity of up to 365 days , and bears interest at rates agreed to at the time of the borrowing . the interest rate is generally based on a standard index such as the federal funds rate , libor or the money market rate as found in the commercial paper market . as of december 31 , 2015 , devon 2019s outstanding commercial paper borrowings had a weighted-average borrowing rate of 0.63% ( 0.63 % ) . issuance of senior notes in june 2015 , devon issued $ 750 million of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) senior notes due 2045 that are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . devon used the net proceeds to repay the floating rate senior notes that matured on december 15 , 2015 , as well as outstanding commercial paper balances . in december 2015 , in conjunction with the announcement of the powder river basin and stack acquisitions , devon issued $ 850 million of 5.85% ( 5.85 % ) senior notes due 2025 that are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . devon used the net proceeds to fund the cash portion of these acquisitions. .
Question: as of 2015, what was the amount of the notes issued maturing in 2045?
Answer: 850.0
Question: and what was it for the ones maturing in 2025?
Answer: 750.0
Question: how much, then, did the 2045 amount represent in relation to this 2025 one?
Answer: 1.13333
Question: and concerning the debt maturities, what was their maximum value between the year of 2018 to 2020?
Answer: 1100.0
Question: and what was their minimum one?
| 414.0 |
CONVFINQA5531 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) debt maturities as of december 31 , 2015 , excluding premiums and discounts , are as follows ( millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 976</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>875</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>1100</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>414</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>9763</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 13128</td></tr></table> credit lines devon has a $ 3.0 billion senior credit facility . the maturity date for $ 30 million of the senior credit facility is october 24 , 2017 . the maturity date for $ 164 million of the senior credit facility is october 24 , 2018 . the maturity date for the remaining $ 2.8 billion is october 24 , 2019 . amounts borrowed under the senior credit facility may , at the election of devon , bear interest at various fixed rate options for periods of up to twelve months . such rates are generally less than the prime rate . however , devon may elect to borrow at the prime rate . the senior credit facility currently provides for an annual facility fee of $ 3.8 million that is payable quarterly in arrears . as of december 31 , 2015 , there were no borrowings under the senior credit facility . the senior credit facility contains only one material financial covenant . this covenant requires devon 2019s ratio of total funded debt to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , to be no greater than 65% ( 65 % ) . the credit agreement contains definitions of total funded debt and total capitalization that include adjustments to the respective amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements . also , total capitalization is adjusted to add back noncash financial write-downs such as full cost ceiling impairments or goodwill impairments . as of december 31 , 2015 , devon was in compliance with this covenant with a debt-to- capitalization ratio of 23.7% ( 23.7 % ) . commercial paper devon 2019s senior credit facility supports its $ 3.0 billion of short-term credit under its commercial paper program . commercial paper debt generally has a maturity of between 1 and 90 days , although it can have a maturity of up to 365 days , and bears interest at rates agreed to at the time of the borrowing . the interest rate is generally based on a standard index such as the federal funds rate , libor or the money market rate as found in the commercial paper market . as of december 31 , 2015 , devon 2019s outstanding commercial paper borrowings had a weighted-average borrowing rate of 0.63% ( 0.63 % ) . issuance of senior notes in june 2015 , devon issued $ 750 million of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) senior notes due 2045 that are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . devon used the net proceeds to repay the floating rate senior notes that matured on december 15 , 2015 , as well as outstanding commercial paper balances . in december 2015 , in conjunction with the announcement of the powder river basin and stack acquisitions , devon issued $ 850 million of 5.85% ( 5.85 % ) senior notes due 2025 that are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . devon used the net proceeds to fund the cash portion of these acquisitions. .
Question: as of 2015, what was the amount of the notes issued maturing in 2045?
Answer: 850.0
Question: and what was it for the ones maturing in 2025?
Answer: 750.0
Question: how much, then, did the 2045 amount represent in relation to this 2025 one?
Answer: 1.13333
Question: and concerning the debt maturities, what was their maximum value between the year of 2018 to 2020?
Answer: 1100.0
Question: and what was their minimum one?
Answer: 414.0
Question: what was, then, their mathematical range for that period?
| 686.0 |
CONVFINQA5532 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
long-term product offerings include active and index strategies . our active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile . we offer two types of active strategies : those that rely primarily on fundamental research and those that utilize primarily quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . although many clients use both active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class , or may use a combination of index strategies to target active returns . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . this has the potential to exaggerate the significance of net flows in institutional index products on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2016 equity aum totaled $ 2.657 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 51.4 billion . net inflows included $ 74.9 billion into ishares , driven by net inflows into the core ranges and broad developed and emerging market equities . ishares net inflows were partially offset by active and non-etf index net outflows of $ 20.2 billion and $ 3.3 billion , respectively . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aum mix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which may not consistently move in tandem with u.s . markets , have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s effective equity fee rates and revenues . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2016 at $ 1.572 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 120.0 billion . in 2016 , active net inflows of $ 16.6 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , and included strong inflows from insurance clients . fixed income ishares net inflows of $ 59.9 billion were led by flows into the core ranges , emerging market , high yield and corporate bond funds . non-etf index net inflows of $ 43.4 billion were driven by demand for liability-driven investment solutions . multi-asset blackrock 2019s multi-asset team manages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset aum for 2016 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , net inflows ( outflows ) market change impact december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 312015</td><td>net inflows ( outflows )</td><td>marketchange</td><td>fx impact</td><td>december 312016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>asset allocation and balanced</td><td>$ 185836</td><td>$ -10332 ( 10332 )</td><td>$ 6705</td><td>$ -5534 ( 5534 )</td><td>$ 176675</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>target date/risk</td><td>125664</td><td>13500</td><td>10189</td><td>79</td><td>149432</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fiduciary</td><td>64433</td><td>998</td><td>5585</td><td>-2621 ( 2621 )</td><td>68395</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>futureadvisor ( 1 )</td><td>403</td><td>61</td><td>41</td><td>2014</td><td>505</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 376336</td><td>$ 4227</td><td>$ 22520</td><td>$ -8076 ( 8076 )</td><td>$ 395007</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the futureadvisor amount does not include aum that was held in ishares holdings . multi-asset net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 13.2 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 11.3 billion to institutional multi-asset net inflows in 2016 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net outflows of $ 9.4 billion were primarily due to outflows from world allocation strategies . the company 2019s multi-asset strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 45% ( 45 % ) of multi-asset aum at year-end . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation and multi-asset income fund families . 2022 target date and target risk products grew 11% ( 11 % ) organically in 2016 , with net inflows of $ 13.5 billion . institutional investors represented 94% ( 94 % ) of target date and target risk aum , with defined contribution plans accounting for 88% ( 88 % ) of aum . flows were driven by defined contribution investments in our lifepath and lifepath retirement income ae offerings . lifepath products utilize a proprietary asset allocation model that seeks to balance risk and return over an investment horizon based on the investor 2019s expected retirement timing . 2022 fiduciary management services are complex mandates in which pension plan sponsors or endowments and foundations retain blackrock to assume responsibility for some or all aspects of plan management . these customized services require strong partnership with the clients 2019 investment staff and trustees in order to tailor investment strategies to meet client-specific risk budgets and return objectives. .
Question: what was the change in the target date/risk between 12/31/15 and 12/31/16?
| 23768.0 |
CONVFINQA5533 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
long-term product offerings include active and index strategies . our active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile . we offer two types of active strategies : those that rely primarily on fundamental research and those that utilize primarily quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . although many clients use both active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class , or may use a combination of index strategies to target active returns . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . this has the potential to exaggerate the significance of net flows in institutional index products on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2016 equity aum totaled $ 2.657 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 51.4 billion . net inflows included $ 74.9 billion into ishares , driven by net inflows into the core ranges and broad developed and emerging market equities . ishares net inflows were partially offset by active and non-etf index net outflows of $ 20.2 billion and $ 3.3 billion , respectively . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aum mix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which may not consistently move in tandem with u.s . markets , have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s effective equity fee rates and revenues . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2016 at $ 1.572 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 120.0 billion . in 2016 , active net inflows of $ 16.6 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , and included strong inflows from insurance clients . fixed income ishares net inflows of $ 59.9 billion were led by flows into the core ranges , emerging market , high yield and corporate bond funds . non-etf index net inflows of $ 43.4 billion were driven by demand for liability-driven investment solutions . multi-asset blackrock 2019s multi-asset team manages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset aum for 2016 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , net inflows ( outflows ) market change impact december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 312015</td><td>net inflows ( outflows )</td><td>marketchange</td><td>fx impact</td><td>december 312016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>asset allocation and balanced</td><td>$ 185836</td><td>$ -10332 ( 10332 )</td><td>$ 6705</td><td>$ -5534 ( 5534 )</td><td>$ 176675</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>target date/risk</td><td>125664</td><td>13500</td><td>10189</td><td>79</td><td>149432</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fiduciary</td><td>64433</td><td>998</td><td>5585</td><td>-2621 ( 2621 )</td><td>68395</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>futureadvisor ( 1 )</td><td>403</td><td>61</td><td>41</td><td>2014</td><td>505</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 376336</td><td>$ 4227</td><td>$ 22520</td><td>$ -8076 ( 8076 )</td><td>$ 395007</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the futureadvisor amount does not include aum that was held in ishares holdings . multi-asset net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 13.2 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 11.3 billion to institutional multi-asset net inflows in 2016 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net outflows of $ 9.4 billion were primarily due to outflows from world allocation strategies . the company 2019s multi-asset strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 45% ( 45 % ) of multi-asset aum at year-end . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation and multi-asset income fund families . 2022 target date and target risk products grew 11% ( 11 % ) organically in 2016 , with net inflows of $ 13.5 billion . institutional investors represented 94% ( 94 % ) of target date and target risk aum , with defined contribution plans accounting for 88% ( 88 % ) of aum . flows were driven by defined contribution investments in our lifepath and lifepath retirement income ae offerings . lifepath products utilize a proprietary asset allocation model that seeks to balance risk and return over an investment horizon based on the investor 2019s expected retirement timing . 2022 fiduciary management services are complex mandates in which pension plan sponsors or endowments and foundations retain blackrock to assume responsibility for some or all aspects of plan management . these customized services require strong partnership with the clients 2019 investment staff and trustees in order to tailor investment strategies to meet client-specific risk budgets and return objectives. .
Question: what was the change in the target date/risk between 12/31/15 and 12/31/16?
Answer: 23768.0
Question: so what was the percentage change of this value?
| 0.18914 |
CONVFINQA5534 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
long-term product offerings include active and index strategies . our active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile . we offer two types of active strategies : those that rely primarily on fundamental research and those that utilize primarily quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . although many clients use both active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class , or may use a combination of index strategies to target active returns . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . this has the potential to exaggerate the significance of net flows in institutional index products on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2016 equity aum totaled $ 2.657 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 51.4 billion . net inflows included $ 74.9 billion into ishares , driven by net inflows into the core ranges and broad developed and emerging market equities . ishares net inflows were partially offset by active and non-etf index net outflows of $ 20.2 billion and $ 3.3 billion , respectively . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aum mix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which may not consistently move in tandem with u.s . markets , have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s effective equity fee rates and revenues . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2016 at $ 1.572 trillion , reflecting net inflows of $ 120.0 billion . in 2016 , active net inflows of $ 16.6 billion were diversified across fixed income offerings , and included strong inflows from insurance clients . fixed income ishares net inflows of $ 59.9 billion were led by flows into the core ranges , emerging market , high yield and corporate bond funds . non-etf index net inflows of $ 43.4 billion were driven by demand for liability-driven investment solutions . multi-asset blackrock 2019s multi-asset team manages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , bonds , currencies and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset aum for 2016 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , net inflows ( outflows ) market change impact december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 312015</td><td>net inflows ( outflows )</td><td>marketchange</td><td>fx impact</td><td>december 312016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>asset allocation and balanced</td><td>$ 185836</td><td>$ -10332 ( 10332 )</td><td>$ 6705</td><td>$ -5534 ( 5534 )</td><td>$ 176675</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>target date/risk</td><td>125664</td><td>13500</td><td>10189</td><td>79</td><td>149432</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fiduciary</td><td>64433</td><td>998</td><td>5585</td><td>-2621 ( 2621 )</td><td>68395</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>futureadvisor ( 1 )</td><td>403</td><td>61</td><td>41</td><td>2014</td><td>505</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 376336</td><td>$ 4227</td><td>$ 22520</td><td>$ -8076 ( 8076 )</td><td>$ 395007</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the futureadvisor amount does not include aum that was held in ishares holdings . multi-asset net inflows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 13.2 billion of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 11.3 billion to institutional multi-asset net inflows in 2016 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net outflows of $ 9.4 billion were primarily due to outflows from world allocation strategies . the company 2019s multi-asset strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 45% ( 45 % ) of multi-asset aum at year-end . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation and multi-asset income fund families . 2022 target date and target risk products grew 11% ( 11 % ) organically in 2016 , with net inflows of $ 13.5 billion . institutional investors represented 94% ( 94 % ) of target date and target risk aum , with defined contribution plans accounting for 88% ( 88 % ) of aum . flows were driven by defined contribution investments in our lifepath and lifepath retirement income ae offerings . lifepath products utilize a proprietary asset allocation model that seeks to balance risk and return over an investment horizon based on the investor 2019s expected retirement timing . 2022 fiduciary management services are complex mandates in which pension plan sponsors or endowments and foundations retain blackrock to assume responsibility for some or all aspects of plan management . these customized services require strong partnership with the clients 2019 investment staff and trustees in order to tailor investment strategies to meet client-specific risk budgets and return objectives. .
Question: what was the change in the target date/risk between 12/31/15 and 12/31/16?
Answer: 23768.0
Question: so what was the percentage change of this value?
Answer: 0.18914
Question: what is the asset allocation and balanced as a percentage of the total component changes in multi-asset aum in 2015?
| 0.4938 |
CONVFINQA5535 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) as of december 31 , 2006 , the company held a total of ten interest rate swap agreements to manage exposure to variable rate interest obligations under its amt opco and spectrasite credit facilities and four forward starting interest rate swap agreements to manage exposure to variability in cash flows relating to forecasted interest payments in connection with the securitization which the company designated as cash flow hedges . the eight american tower swaps had an aggregate notional amount of $ 450.0 million and fixed rates ranging between 4.63% ( 4.63 % ) and 4.88% ( 4.88 % ) and the two spectrasite swaps have an aggregate notional amount of $ 100.0 million and a fixed rate of 4.95% ( 4.95 % ) . the four forward starting interest rate swap agreements had an aggregate notional amount of $ 900.0 million , fixed rates ranging between 4.73% ( 4.73 % ) and 5.10% ( 5.10 % ) . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company also held three interest rate swap instruments and one interest rate cap instrument that were acquired in the spectrasite , inc . merger in august 2005 and were not designated as cash flow hedges . the three interest rate swaps , which had a fair value of $ 6.7 million at the date of acquisition , have an aggregate notional amount of $ 300.0 million , a fixed rate of 3.88% ( 3.88 % ) . the interest rate cap had a notional amount of $ 175.0 million , a fixed rate of 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) , and expired in february 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains on short term available-for-sale securities of $ 10.4 million and unrealized gains related to the interest rate swap agreements in the table above of $ 5.7 million , net of tax . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded a net unrealized gain of approximately $ 6.5 million ( net of a tax provision of approximately $ 3.5 million ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and reclassified $ 0.7 million ( net of an income tax benefit of $ 0.2 million ) into results of operations during the year ended december 31 , 2006 . 9 . commitments and contingencies lease obligations 2014the company leases certain land , office and tower space under operating leases that expire over various terms . many of the leases contain renewal options with specified increases in lease payments upon exercise of the renewal option . escalation clauses present in operating leases , excluding those tied to cpi or other inflation-based indices , are recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable term of the lease . ( see note 1. ) future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases include payments for certain renewal periods at the company 2019s option because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable tower site and related revenues from tenant leases , thereby making it reasonably assured that the company will renew the lease . such payments in effect at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 217969</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>215763</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>208548</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>199024</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>190272</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2451496</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3483072</td></tr></table> aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 approximated $ 246.4 million , $ 237.0 million and $ 168.7 million , respectively. .
Question: what was the aggregate rent expense in 2007?
| 246.4 |
CONVFINQA5536 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) as of december 31 , 2006 , the company held a total of ten interest rate swap agreements to manage exposure to variable rate interest obligations under its amt opco and spectrasite credit facilities and four forward starting interest rate swap agreements to manage exposure to variability in cash flows relating to forecasted interest payments in connection with the securitization which the company designated as cash flow hedges . the eight american tower swaps had an aggregate notional amount of $ 450.0 million and fixed rates ranging between 4.63% ( 4.63 % ) and 4.88% ( 4.88 % ) and the two spectrasite swaps have an aggregate notional amount of $ 100.0 million and a fixed rate of 4.95% ( 4.95 % ) . the four forward starting interest rate swap agreements had an aggregate notional amount of $ 900.0 million , fixed rates ranging between 4.73% ( 4.73 % ) and 5.10% ( 5.10 % ) . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company also held three interest rate swap instruments and one interest rate cap instrument that were acquired in the spectrasite , inc . merger in august 2005 and were not designated as cash flow hedges . the three interest rate swaps , which had a fair value of $ 6.7 million at the date of acquisition , have an aggregate notional amount of $ 300.0 million , a fixed rate of 3.88% ( 3.88 % ) . the interest rate cap had a notional amount of $ 175.0 million , a fixed rate of 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) , and expired in february 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains on short term available-for-sale securities of $ 10.4 million and unrealized gains related to the interest rate swap agreements in the table above of $ 5.7 million , net of tax . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded a net unrealized gain of approximately $ 6.5 million ( net of a tax provision of approximately $ 3.5 million ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and reclassified $ 0.7 million ( net of an income tax benefit of $ 0.2 million ) into results of operations during the year ended december 31 , 2006 . 9 . commitments and contingencies lease obligations 2014the company leases certain land , office and tower space under operating leases that expire over various terms . many of the leases contain renewal options with specified increases in lease payments upon exercise of the renewal option . escalation clauses present in operating leases , excluding those tied to cpi or other inflation-based indices , are recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable term of the lease . ( see note 1. ) future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases include payments for certain renewal periods at the company 2019s option because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable tower site and related revenues from tenant leases , thereby making it reasonably assured that the company will renew the lease . such payments in effect at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 217969</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>215763</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>208548</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>199024</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>190272</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2451496</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3483072</td></tr></table> aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 approximated $ 246.4 million , $ 237.0 million and $ 168.7 million , respectively. .
Question: what was the aggregate rent expense in 2007?
Answer: 246.4
Question: and what was it in 2006?
| 237.0 |
CONVFINQA5537 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) as of december 31 , 2006 , the company held a total of ten interest rate swap agreements to manage exposure to variable rate interest obligations under its amt opco and spectrasite credit facilities and four forward starting interest rate swap agreements to manage exposure to variability in cash flows relating to forecasted interest payments in connection with the securitization which the company designated as cash flow hedges . the eight american tower swaps had an aggregate notional amount of $ 450.0 million and fixed rates ranging between 4.63% ( 4.63 % ) and 4.88% ( 4.88 % ) and the two spectrasite swaps have an aggregate notional amount of $ 100.0 million and a fixed rate of 4.95% ( 4.95 % ) . the four forward starting interest rate swap agreements had an aggregate notional amount of $ 900.0 million , fixed rates ranging between 4.73% ( 4.73 % ) and 5.10% ( 5.10 % ) . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company also held three interest rate swap instruments and one interest rate cap instrument that were acquired in the spectrasite , inc . merger in august 2005 and were not designated as cash flow hedges . the three interest rate swaps , which had a fair value of $ 6.7 million at the date of acquisition , have an aggregate notional amount of $ 300.0 million , a fixed rate of 3.88% ( 3.88 % ) . the interest rate cap had a notional amount of $ 175.0 million , a fixed rate of 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) , and expired in february 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains on short term available-for-sale securities of $ 10.4 million and unrealized gains related to the interest rate swap agreements in the table above of $ 5.7 million , net of tax . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded a net unrealized gain of approximately $ 6.5 million ( net of a tax provision of approximately $ 3.5 million ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and reclassified $ 0.7 million ( net of an income tax benefit of $ 0.2 million ) into results of operations during the year ended december 31 , 2006 . 9 . commitments and contingencies lease obligations 2014the company leases certain land , office and tower space under operating leases that expire over various terms . many of the leases contain renewal options with specified increases in lease payments upon exercise of the renewal option . escalation clauses present in operating leases , excluding those tied to cpi or other inflation-based indices , are recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable term of the lease . ( see note 1. ) future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases include payments for certain renewal periods at the company 2019s option because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable tower site and related revenues from tenant leases , thereby making it reasonably assured that the company will renew the lease . such payments in effect at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 217969</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>215763</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>208548</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>199024</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>190272</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2451496</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3483072</td></tr></table> aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 approximated $ 246.4 million , $ 237.0 million and $ 168.7 million , respectively. .
Question: what was the aggregate rent expense in 2007?
Answer: 246.4
Question: and what was it in 2006?
Answer: 237.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 9.4 |
CONVFINQA5538 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) as of december 31 , 2006 , the company held a total of ten interest rate swap agreements to manage exposure to variable rate interest obligations under its amt opco and spectrasite credit facilities and four forward starting interest rate swap agreements to manage exposure to variability in cash flows relating to forecasted interest payments in connection with the securitization which the company designated as cash flow hedges . the eight american tower swaps had an aggregate notional amount of $ 450.0 million and fixed rates ranging between 4.63% ( 4.63 % ) and 4.88% ( 4.88 % ) and the two spectrasite swaps have an aggregate notional amount of $ 100.0 million and a fixed rate of 4.95% ( 4.95 % ) . the four forward starting interest rate swap agreements had an aggregate notional amount of $ 900.0 million , fixed rates ranging between 4.73% ( 4.73 % ) and 5.10% ( 5.10 % ) . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company also held three interest rate swap instruments and one interest rate cap instrument that were acquired in the spectrasite , inc . merger in august 2005 and were not designated as cash flow hedges . the three interest rate swaps , which had a fair value of $ 6.7 million at the date of acquisition , have an aggregate notional amount of $ 300.0 million , a fixed rate of 3.88% ( 3.88 % ) . the interest rate cap had a notional amount of $ 175.0 million , a fixed rate of 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) , and expired in february 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains on short term available-for-sale securities of $ 10.4 million and unrealized gains related to the interest rate swap agreements in the table above of $ 5.7 million , net of tax . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded a net unrealized gain of approximately $ 6.5 million ( net of a tax provision of approximately $ 3.5 million ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and reclassified $ 0.7 million ( net of an income tax benefit of $ 0.2 million ) into results of operations during the year ended december 31 , 2006 . 9 . commitments and contingencies lease obligations 2014the company leases certain land , office and tower space under operating leases that expire over various terms . many of the leases contain renewal options with specified increases in lease payments upon exercise of the renewal option . escalation clauses present in operating leases , excluding those tied to cpi or other inflation-based indices , are recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable term of the lease . ( see note 1. ) future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases include payments for certain renewal periods at the company 2019s option because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable tower site and related revenues from tenant leases , thereby making it reasonably assured that the company will renew the lease . such payments in effect at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 217969</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>215763</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>208548</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>199024</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>190272</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2451496</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3483072</td></tr></table> aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 approximated $ 246.4 million , $ 237.0 million and $ 168.7 million , respectively. .
Question: what was the aggregate rent expense in 2007?
Answer: 246.4
Question: and what was it in 2006?
Answer: 237.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 9.4
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the aggregate rent expense in 2006, in percentage?
| 0.03966 |
CONVFINQA5539 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
issuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information regarding purchases of our common stock that were made by us during the fourth quarter of 2011 . period total number of shares purchased ( 2 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 ) maximum dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( 1 ) ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased ( 2 )</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part ofpublicly announced plans or programs ( 1 )</td><td>maximum dollar value of shares that may yetbe purchased under the plans or programs ( 1 ) ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 2013 october 31</td><td>3228557</td><td>$ 58.52</td><td>3227800</td><td>$ 108</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 2013 november 30</td><td>1813994</td><td>$ 66.38</td><td>1618110</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 2013 december 31</td><td>475685</td><td>$ 64.68</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>5518236</td><td>$ 61.64</td><td>4845910</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in may 2010 , our board of directors approved a $ 3.5 billion share repurchase program . we completed this program in the fourth quarter of 2011 . in total , we repurchased 49.2 million common shares for $ 3.5 billion , or $ 71.18 per share , under this program . ( 2 ) during the fourth quarter of 2011 , we repurchased 672326 shares from company employees for the payment of personal income tax withholdings resulting from restricted stock vesting and stock option exercises . such repurchases are in addition to the $ 3.5 billion repurchase program . under the devon energy corporation incentive savings plan ( the 201cplan 201d ) , eligible employees may purchase shares of our common stock through an investment in the devon stock fund ( the 201cstock fund 201d ) , which is administered by an independent trustee , fidelity management trust company . eligible employees purchased approximately 45000 shares of our common stock in 2011 , at then-prevailing stock prices , that they held through their ownership in the stock fund . we acquired the shares of our common stock sold under the plan through open-market purchases . we filed a registration statement on form s-8 on january 26 , 2012 registering any offers and sales of interests in the plan or the stock fund and of the underlying shares of our common stock purchased by plan participants after that date . similarly , under the devon canada corporation savings plan ( the 201ccanadian plan 201d ) , eligible canadian employees may purchase shares of our common stock through an investment in the canadian plan , which is administered by an independent trustee , sun life assurance company of canada . eligible canadian employees purchased approximately 9000 shares of our common stock in 2011 , at then-prevailing stock prices , that they held through their ownership in the canadian plan . we acquired the shares sold under the canadian plan through open-market purchases . these shares and any interest in the canadian plan were offered and sold in reliance on the exemptions for offers and sales of securities made outside of the u.s. , including under regulation s for offers and sales of securities to employees pursuant to an employee benefit plan established and administered in accordance with the law of a country other than the u.s. .
Question: what was the average share price in november?
| 66.38 |
CONVFINQA5540 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
issuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information regarding purchases of our common stock that were made by us during the fourth quarter of 2011 . period total number of shares purchased ( 2 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 ) maximum dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( 1 ) ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased ( 2 )</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part ofpublicly announced plans or programs ( 1 )</td><td>maximum dollar value of shares that may yetbe purchased under the plans or programs ( 1 ) ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 2013 october 31</td><td>3228557</td><td>$ 58.52</td><td>3227800</td><td>$ 108</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 2013 november 30</td><td>1813994</td><td>$ 66.38</td><td>1618110</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 2013 december 31</td><td>475685</td><td>$ 64.68</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>5518236</td><td>$ 61.64</td><td>4845910</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in may 2010 , our board of directors approved a $ 3.5 billion share repurchase program . we completed this program in the fourth quarter of 2011 . in total , we repurchased 49.2 million common shares for $ 3.5 billion , or $ 71.18 per share , under this program . ( 2 ) during the fourth quarter of 2011 , we repurchased 672326 shares from company employees for the payment of personal income tax withholdings resulting from restricted stock vesting and stock option exercises . such repurchases are in addition to the $ 3.5 billion repurchase program . under the devon energy corporation incentive savings plan ( the 201cplan 201d ) , eligible employees may purchase shares of our common stock through an investment in the devon stock fund ( the 201cstock fund 201d ) , which is administered by an independent trustee , fidelity management trust company . eligible employees purchased approximately 45000 shares of our common stock in 2011 , at then-prevailing stock prices , that they held through their ownership in the stock fund . we acquired the shares of our common stock sold under the plan through open-market purchases . we filed a registration statement on form s-8 on january 26 , 2012 registering any offers and sales of interests in the plan or the stock fund and of the underlying shares of our common stock purchased by plan participants after that date . similarly , under the devon canada corporation savings plan ( the 201ccanadian plan 201d ) , eligible canadian employees may purchase shares of our common stock through an investment in the canadian plan , which is administered by an independent trustee , sun life assurance company of canada . eligible canadian employees purchased approximately 9000 shares of our common stock in 2011 , at then-prevailing stock prices , that they held through their ownership in the canadian plan . we acquired the shares sold under the canadian plan through open-market purchases . these shares and any interest in the canadian plan were offered and sold in reliance on the exemptions for offers and sales of securities made outside of the u.s. , including under regulation s for offers and sales of securities to employees pursuant to an employee benefit plan established and administered in accordance with the law of a country other than the u.s. .
Question: what was the average share price in november?
Answer: 66.38
Question: what was the average share price in october?
| 58.52 |
CONVFINQA5541 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
issuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information regarding purchases of our common stock that were made by us during the fourth quarter of 2011 . period total number of shares purchased ( 2 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 ) maximum dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( 1 ) ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased ( 2 )</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part ofpublicly announced plans or programs ( 1 )</td><td>maximum dollar value of shares that may yetbe purchased under the plans or programs ( 1 ) ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 2013 october 31</td><td>3228557</td><td>$ 58.52</td><td>3227800</td><td>$ 108</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 2013 november 30</td><td>1813994</td><td>$ 66.38</td><td>1618110</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 2013 december 31</td><td>475685</td><td>$ 64.68</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>5518236</td><td>$ 61.64</td><td>4845910</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in may 2010 , our board of directors approved a $ 3.5 billion share repurchase program . we completed this program in the fourth quarter of 2011 . in total , we repurchased 49.2 million common shares for $ 3.5 billion , or $ 71.18 per share , under this program . ( 2 ) during the fourth quarter of 2011 , we repurchased 672326 shares from company employees for the payment of personal income tax withholdings resulting from restricted stock vesting and stock option exercises . such repurchases are in addition to the $ 3.5 billion repurchase program . under the devon energy corporation incentive savings plan ( the 201cplan 201d ) , eligible employees may purchase shares of our common stock through an investment in the devon stock fund ( the 201cstock fund 201d ) , which is administered by an independent trustee , fidelity management trust company . eligible employees purchased approximately 45000 shares of our common stock in 2011 , at then-prevailing stock prices , that they held through their ownership in the stock fund . we acquired the shares of our common stock sold under the plan through open-market purchases . we filed a registration statement on form s-8 on january 26 , 2012 registering any offers and sales of interests in the plan or the stock fund and of the underlying shares of our common stock purchased by plan participants after that date . similarly , under the devon canada corporation savings plan ( the 201ccanadian plan 201d ) , eligible canadian employees may purchase shares of our common stock through an investment in the canadian plan , which is administered by an independent trustee , sun life assurance company of canada . eligible canadian employees purchased approximately 9000 shares of our common stock in 2011 , at then-prevailing stock prices , that they held through their ownership in the canadian plan . we acquired the shares sold under the canadian plan through open-market purchases . these shares and any interest in the canadian plan were offered and sold in reliance on the exemptions for offers and sales of securities made outside of the u.s. , including under regulation s for offers and sales of securities to employees pursuant to an employee benefit plan established and administered in accordance with the law of a country other than the u.s. .
Question: what was the average share price in november?
Answer: 66.38
Question: what was the average share price in october?
Answer: 58.52
Question: what is the net difference?
| 7.86 |
CONVFINQA5542 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
issuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information regarding purchases of our common stock that were made by us during the fourth quarter of 2011 . period total number of shares purchased ( 2 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 ) maximum dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( 1 ) ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased ( 2 )</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part ofpublicly announced plans or programs ( 1 )</td><td>maximum dollar value of shares that may yetbe purchased under the plans or programs ( 1 ) ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 2013 october 31</td><td>3228557</td><td>$ 58.52</td><td>3227800</td><td>$ 108</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 2013 november 30</td><td>1813994</td><td>$ 66.38</td><td>1618110</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 2013 december 31</td><td>475685</td><td>$ 64.68</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>5518236</td><td>$ 61.64</td><td>4845910</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in may 2010 , our board of directors approved a $ 3.5 billion share repurchase program . we completed this program in the fourth quarter of 2011 . in total , we repurchased 49.2 million common shares for $ 3.5 billion , or $ 71.18 per share , under this program . ( 2 ) during the fourth quarter of 2011 , we repurchased 672326 shares from company employees for the payment of personal income tax withholdings resulting from restricted stock vesting and stock option exercises . such repurchases are in addition to the $ 3.5 billion repurchase program . under the devon energy corporation incentive savings plan ( the 201cplan 201d ) , eligible employees may purchase shares of our common stock through an investment in the devon stock fund ( the 201cstock fund 201d ) , which is administered by an independent trustee , fidelity management trust company . eligible employees purchased approximately 45000 shares of our common stock in 2011 , at then-prevailing stock prices , that they held through their ownership in the stock fund . we acquired the shares of our common stock sold under the plan through open-market purchases . we filed a registration statement on form s-8 on january 26 , 2012 registering any offers and sales of interests in the plan or the stock fund and of the underlying shares of our common stock purchased by plan participants after that date . similarly , under the devon canada corporation savings plan ( the 201ccanadian plan 201d ) , eligible canadian employees may purchase shares of our common stock through an investment in the canadian plan , which is administered by an independent trustee , sun life assurance company of canada . eligible canadian employees purchased approximately 9000 shares of our common stock in 2011 , at then-prevailing stock prices , that they held through their ownership in the canadian plan . we acquired the shares sold under the canadian plan through open-market purchases . these shares and any interest in the canadian plan were offered and sold in reliance on the exemptions for offers and sales of securities made outside of the u.s. , including under regulation s for offers and sales of securities to employees pursuant to an employee benefit plan established and administered in accordance with the law of a country other than the u.s. .
Question: what was the average share price in november?
Answer: 66.38
Question: what was the average share price in october?
Answer: 58.52
Question: what is the net difference?
Answer: 7.86
Question: what is the october price?
| 58.52 |
CONVFINQA5543 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
issuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information regarding purchases of our common stock that were made by us during the fourth quarter of 2011 . period total number of shares purchased ( 2 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 ) maximum dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( 1 ) ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total number of shares purchased ( 2 )</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part ofpublicly announced plans or programs ( 1 )</td><td>maximum dollar value of shares that may yetbe purchased under the plans or programs ( 1 ) ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 2013 october 31</td><td>3228557</td><td>$ 58.52</td><td>3227800</td><td>$ 108</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 2013 november 30</td><td>1813994</td><td>$ 66.38</td><td>1618110</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 2013 december 31</td><td>475685</td><td>$ 64.68</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>5518236</td><td>$ 61.64</td><td>4845910</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in may 2010 , our board of directors approved a $ 3.5 billion share repurchase program . we completed this program in the fourth quarter of 2011 . in total , we repurchased 49.2 million common shares for $ 3.5 billion , or $ 71.18 per share , under this program . ( 2 ) during the fourth quarter of 2011 , we repurchased 672326 shares from company employees for the payment of personal income tax withholdings resulting from restricted stock vesting and stock option exercises . such repurchases are in addition to the $ 3.5 billion repurchase program . under the devon energy corporation incentive savings plan ( the 201cplan 201d ) , eligible employees may purchase shares of our common stock through an investment in the devon stock fund ( the 201cstock fund 201d ) , which is administered by an independent trustee , fidelity management trust company . eligible employees purchased approximately 45000 shares of our common stock in 2011 , at then-prevailing stock prices , that they held through their ownership in the stock fund . we acquired the shares of our common stock sold under the plan through open-market purchases . we filed a registration statement on form s-8 on january 26 , 2012 registering any offers and sales of interests in the plan or the stock fund and of the underlying shares of our common stock purchased by plan participants after that date . similarly , under the devon canada corporation savings plan ( the 201ccanadian plan 201d ) , eligible canadian employees may purchase shares of our common stock through an investment in the canadian plan , which is administered by an independent trustee , sun life assurance company of canada . eligible canadian employees purchased approximately 9000 shares of our common stock in 2011 , at then-prevailing stock prices , that they held through their ownership in the canadian plan . we acquired the shares sold under the canadian plan through open-market purchases . these shares and any interest in the canadian plan were offered and sold in reliance on the exemptions for offers and sales of securities made outside of the u.s. , including under regulation s for offers and sales of securities to employees pursuant to an employee benefit plan established and administered in accordance with the law of a country other than the u.s. .
Question: what was the average share price in november?
Answer: 66.38
Question: what was the average share price in october?
Answer: 58.52
Question: what is the net difference?
Answer: 7.86
Question: what is the october price?
Answer: 58.52
Question: what is the net change in price divided by the october price?
| 0.13431 |
CONVFINQA5544 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations introduction the following discussion and analysis presents management 2019s perspective of our business , financial condition and overall performance . this information is intended to provide investors with an understanding of our past performance , current financial condition and outlook for the future and should be read in conjunction with 201citem 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 201d of this report . overview of 2017 results during 2017 , we generated solid operating results with our strategy of operating in north america 2019s best resource plays , delivering superior execution , continuing disciplined capital allocation and maintaining a high degree of financial strength . led by our development in the stack and delaware basin , we continued to improve our 90-day initial production rates . with investments in proprietary data tools , predictive analytics and artificial intelligence , we are delivering industry-leading , initial-rate well productivity performance and improving the performance of our established wells . compared to 2016 , commodity prices increased significantly and were the primary driver for improvements in devon 2019s earnings and cash flow during 2017 . we exited 2017 with liquidity comprised of $ 2.7 billion of cash and $ 2.9 billion of available credit under our senior credit facility . we have no significant debt maturities until 2021 . we further enhanced our financial strength by completing approximately $ 415 million of our announced $ 1 billion asset divestiture program in 2017 . we anticipate closing the remaining divestitures in 2018 . in 2018 and beyond , we have the financial capacity to further accelerate investment across our best-in-class u.s . resource plays . we are increasing drilling activity and will continue to shift our production mix to high-margin products . we will continue our premier technical work to drive capital allocation and efficiency and industry- leading well productivity results . we will continue to maximize the value of our base production by sustaining the operational efficiencies we have achieved . finally , we will continue to manage activity levels within our cash flows . we expect this disciplined approach will position us to deliver capital-efficient , cash-flow expansion over the next two years . key measures of our financial performance in 2017 are summarized in the following table . increased commodity prices as well as continued focus on our production expenses improved our 2017 financial performance as compared to 2016 , as seen in the table below . more details for these metrics are found within the 201cresults of operations 2013 2017 vs . 2016 201d , below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>net earnings ( loss ) attributable to devon</td><td>2017 $ 898</td><td>change +185% ( +185 % )</td><td>2016* $ -1056 ( 1056 )</td><td>change +92% ( +92 % )</td><td>2015* $ -12896 ( 12896 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings ( loss ) per diluted share attributable to devon</td><td>$ 1.70</td><td>+181% ( +181 % )</td><td>$ -2.09 ( 2.09 )</td><td>+93% ( +93 % )</td><td>$ -31.72 ( 31.72 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>core earnings ( loss ) attributable to devon ( 1 )</td><td>$ 427</td><td>+217% ( +217 % )</td><td>$ -367 ( 367 )</td><td>- 430% ( 430 % )</td><td>$ 111</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>core earnings ( loss ) per diluted share attributable to devon ( 1 )</td><td>$ 0.81</td><td>+210% ( +210 % )</td><td>$ -0.73 ( 0.73 )</td><td>- 382% ( 382 % )</td><td>$ 0.26</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>retained production ( mboe/d )</td><td>541</td><td>- 4% ( 4 % )</td><td>563</td><td>- 3% ( 3 % )</td><td>580</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total production ( mboe/d )</td><td>543</td><td>- 11% ( 11 % )</td><td>611</td><td>- 10% ( 10 % )</td><td>680</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>realized price per boe ( 2 )</td><td>$ 25.96</td><td>+39% ( +39 % )</td><td>$ 18.72</td><td>- 14% ( 14 % )</td><td>$ 21.68</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>operating cash flow</td><td>$ 2909</td><td>+94% ( +94 % )</td><td>$ 1500</td><td>- 69% ( 69 % )</td><td>$ 4898</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>capitalized expenditures including acquisitions</td><td>$ 2937</td><td>- 25% ( 25 % )</td><td>$ 3908</td><td>- 32% ( 32 % )</td><td>$ 5712</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>shareholder and noncontrolling interests distributions</td><td>$ 481</td><td>- 8% ( 8 % )</td><td>$ 525</td><td>- 19% ( 19 % )</td><td>$ 650</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 2673</td><td>+36% ( +36 % )</td><td>$ 1959</td><td>- 15% ( 15 % )</td><td>$ 2310</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 10406</td><td>+2% ( +2 % )</td><td>$ 10154</td><td>- 22% ( 22 % )</td><td>$ 13032</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>reserves ( mmboe )</td><td>2152</td><td>+5% ( +5 % )</td><td>2058</td><td>- 6% ( 6 % )</td><td>2182</td></tr></table> .
Question: for 2017, what is the ratio of operating cash flow to total debt?
| 3.57717 |
CONVFINQA5545 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations introduction the following discussion and analysis presents management 2019s perspective of our business , financial condition and overall performance . this information is intended to provide investors with an understanding of our past performance , current financial condition and outlook for the future and should be read in conjunction with 201citem 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 201d of this report . overview of 2017 results during 2017 , we generated solid operating results with our strategy of operating in north america 2019s best resource plays , delivering superior execution , continuing disciplined capital allocation and maintaining a high degree of financial strength . led by our development in the stack and delaware basin , we continued to improve our 90-day initial production rates . with investments in proprietary data tools , predictive analytics and artificial intelligence , we are delivering industry-leading , initial-rate well productivity performance and improving the performance of our established wells . compared to 2016 , commodity prices increased significantly and were the primary driver for improvements in devon 2019s earnings and cash flow during 2017 . we exited 2017 with liquidity comprised of $ 2.7 billion of cash and $ 2.9 billion of available credit under our senior credit facility . we have no significant debt maturities until 2021 . we further enhanced our financial strength by completing approximately $ 415 million of our announced $ 1 billion asset divestiture program in 2017 . we anticipate closing the remaining divestitures in 2018 . in 2018 and beyond , we have the financial capacity to further accelerate investment across our best-in-class u.s . resource plays . we are increasing drilling activity and will continue to shift our production mix to high-margin products . we will continue our premier technical work to drive capital allocation and efficiency and industry- leading well productivity results . we will continue to maximize the value of our base production by sustaining the operational efficiencies we have achieved . finally , we will continue to manage activity levels within our cash flows . we expect this disciplined approach will position us to deliver capital-efficient , cash-flow expansion over the next two years . key measures of our financial performance in 2017 are summarized in the following table . increased commodity prices as well as continued focus on our production expenses improved our 2017 financial performance as compared to 2016 , as seen in the table below . more details for these metrics are found within the 201cresults of operations 2013 2017 vs . 2016 201d , below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>net earnings ( loss ) attributable to devon</td><td>2017 $ 898</td><td>change +185% ( +185 % )</td><td>2016* $ -1056 ( 1056 )</td><td>change +92% ( +92 % )</td><td>2015* $ -12896 ( 12896 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings ( loss ) per diluted share attributable to devon</td><td>$ 1.70</td><td>+181% ( +181 % )</td><td>$ -2.09 ( 2.09 )</td><td>+93% ( +93 % )</td><td>$ -31.72 ( 31.72 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>core earnings ( loss ) attributable to devon ( 1 )</td><td>$ 427</td><td>+217% ( +217 % )</td><td>$ -367 ( 367 )</td><td>- 430% ( 430 % )</td><td>$ 111</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>core earnings ( loss ) per diluted share attributable to devon ( 1 )</td><td>$ 0.81</td><td>+210% ( +210 % )</td><td>$ -0.73 ( 0.73 )</td><td>- 382% ( 382 % )</td><td>$ 0.26</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>retained production ( mboe/d )</td><td>541</td><td>- 4% ( 4 % )</td><td>563</td><td>- 3% ( 3 % )</td><td>580</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total production ( mboe/d )</td><td>543</td><td>- 11% ( 11 % )</td><td>611</td><td>- 10% ( 10 % )</td><td>680</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>realized price per boe ( 2 )</td><td>$ 25.96</td><td>+39% ( +39 % )</td><td>$ 18.72</td><td>- 14% ( 14 % )</td><td>$ 21.68</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>operating cash flow</td><td>$ 2909</td><td>+94% ( +94 % )</td><td>$ 1500</td><td>- 69% ( 69 % )</td><td>$ 4898</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>capitalized expenditures including acquisitions</td><td>$ 2937</td><td>- 25% ( 25 % )</td><td>$ 3908</td><td>- 32% ( 32 % )</td><td>$ 5712</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>shareholder and noncontrolling interests distributions</td><td>$ 481</td><td>- 8% ( 8 % )</td><td>$ 525</td><td>- 19% ( 19 % )</td><td>$ 650</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 2673</td><td>+36% ( +36 % )</td><td>$ 1959</td><td>- 15% ( 15 % )</td><td>$ 2310</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 10406</td><td>+2% ( +2 % )</td><td>$ 10154</td><td>- 22% ( 22 % )</td><td>$ 13032</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>reserves ( mmboe )</td><td>2152</td><td>+5% ( +5 % )</td><td>2058</td><td>- 6% ( 6 % )</td><td>2182</td></tr></table> .
Question: for 2017, what is the ratio of operating cash flow to total debt?
Answer: 3.57717
Question: and in 2016?
| 6.76933 |
CONVFINQA5546 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
application of specific accounting literature . for the nonconsolidated proprietary tob trusts and qspe tob trusts , the company recognizes only its residual investment on its balance sheet at fair value and the third-party financing raised by the trusts is off-balance sheet . the following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to municipal bond securitizations for the years 2008 , 2007 and 2006 : in billions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proceeds from new securitizations</td><td>$ 1.2</td><td>$ 10.5</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows</td><td>0.5</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows 0.5 2014 2014 municipal investments municipal investment transactions represent partnerships that finance the construction and rehabilitation of low-income affordable rental housing . the company generally invests in these partnerships as a limited partner and earns a return primarily through the receipt of tax credits earned from the affordable housing investments made by the partnership . client intermediation client intermediation transactions represent a range of transactions designed to provide investors with specified returns based on the returns of an underlying security , referenced asset or index . these transactions include credit-linked notes and equity-linked notes . in these transactions , the spe typically obtains exposure to the underlying security , referenced asset or index through a derivative instrument , such as a total-return swap or a credit-default swap . in turn the spe issues notes to investors that pay a return based on the specified underlying security , referenced asset or index . the spe invests the proceeds in a financial asset or a guaranteed insurance contract ( gic ) that serves as collateral for the derivative contract over the term of the transaction . the company 2019s involvement in these transactions includes being the counterparty to the spe 2019s derivative instruments and investing in a portion of the notes issued by the spe . in certain transactions , the investor 2019s maximum risk of loss is limited and the company absorbs risk of loss above a specified level . the company 2019s maximum risk of loss in these transactions is defined as the amount invested in notes issued by the spe and the notional amount of any risk of loss absorbed by the company through a separate instrument issued by the spe . the derivative instrument held by the company may generate a receivable from the spe ( for example , where the company purchases credit protection from the spe in connection with the spe 2019s issuance of a credit-linked note ) , which is collateralized by the assets owned by the spe . these derivative instruments are not considered variable interests under fin 46 ( r ) and any associated receivables are not included in the calculation of maximum exposure to the spe . structured investment vehicles structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) are spes that issue junior notes and senior debt ( medium-term notes and short-term commercial paper ) to fund the purchase of high quality assets . the junior notes are subject to the 201cfirst loss 201d risk of the sivs . the sivs provide a variable return to the junior note investors based on the net spread between the cost to issue the senior debt and the return realized by the high quality assets . the company acts as manager for the sivs and , prior to december 13 , 2007 , was not contractually obligated to provide liquidity facilities or guarantees to the sivs . in response to the ratings review of the outstanding senior debt of the sivs for a possible downgrade announced by two ratings agencies and the continued reduction of liquidity in the siv-related asset-backed commercial paper and medium-term note markets , on december 13 , 2007 , citigroup announced its commitment to provide support facilities that would support the sivs 2019 senior debt ratings . as a result of this commitment , citigroup became the sivs 2019 primary beneficiary and began consolidating these entities . on february 12 , 2008 , citigroup finalized the terms of the support facilities , which took the form of a commitment to provide $ 3.5 billion of mezzanine capital to the sivs in the event the market value of their junior notes approaches zero . the mezzanine capital facility was increased by $ 1 billion to $ 4.5 billion , with the additional commitment funded during the fourth quarter of 2008 . the facilities rank senior to the junior notes but junior to the commercial paper and medium-term notes . the facilities were at arm 2019s-length terms . interest was paid on the drawn amount of the facilities and a per annum fee was paid on the unused portion . during the period to november 18 , 2008 , the company wrote down $ 3.3 billion on siv assets . in order to complete the wind-down of the sivs , the company , in a nearly cashless transaction , purchased the remaining assets of the sivs at fair value , with a trade date of november 18 , 2008 . the company funded the purchase of the siv assets by assuming the obligation to pay amounts due under the medium-term notes issued by the sivs , as the medium-term notes mature . the net funding provided by the company to fund the purchase of the siv assets was $ 0.3 billion . as of december 31 , 2008 , the carrying amount of the purchased siv assets was $ 16.6 billion , of which $ 16.5 billion is classified as htm assets . investment funds the company is the investment manager for certain investment funds that invest in various asset classes including private equity , hedge funds , real estate , fixed income and infrastructure . the company earns a management fee , which is a percentage of capital under management , and may earn performance fees . in addition , for some of these funds the company has an ownership interest in the investment funds . the company has also established a number of investment funds as opportunities for qualified employees to invest in private equity investments . the company acts as investment manager to these funds and may provide employees with financing on both a recourse and non-recourse basis for a portion of the employees 2019 investment commitments. .
Question: what was the net change in proceeds from new securitizations from 2007 to 2008?
| -9.3 |
CONVFINQA5547 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
application of specific accounting literature . for the nonconsolidated proprietary tob trusts and qspe tob trusts , the company recognizes only its residual investment on its balance sheet at fair value and the third-party financing raised by the trusts is off-balance sheet . the following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to municipal bond securitizations for the years 2008 , 2007 and 2006 : in billions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proceeds from new securitizations</td><td>$ 1.2</td><td>$ 10.5</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows</td><td>0.5</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows 0.5 2014 2014 municipal investments municipal investment transactions represent partnerships that finance the construction and rehabilitation of low-income affordable rental housing . the company generally invests in these partnerships as a limited partner and earns a return primarily through the receipt of tax credits earned from the affordable housing investments made by the partnership . client intermediation client intermediation transactions represent a range of transactions designed to provide investors with specified returns based on the returns of an underlying security , referenced asset or index . these transactions include credit-linked notes and equity-linked notes . in these transactions , the spe typically obtains exposure to the underlying security , referenced asset or index through a derivative instrument , such as a total-return swap or a credit-default swap . in turn the spe issues notes to investors that pay a return based on the specified underlying security , referenced asset or index . the spe invests the proceeds in a financial asset or a guaranteed insurance contract ( gic ) that serves as collateral for the derivative contract over the term of the transaction . the company 2019s involvement in these transactions includes being the counterparty to the spe 2019s derivative instruments and investing in a portion of the notes issued by the spe . in certain transactions , the investor 2019s maximum risk of loss is limited and the company absorbs risk of loss above a specified level . the company 2019s maximum risk of loss in these transactions is defined as the amount invested in notes issued by the spe and the notional amount of any risk of loss absorbed by the company through a separate instrument issued by the spe . the derivative instrument held by the company may generate a receivable from the spe ( for example , where the company purchases credit protection from the spe in connection with the spe 2019s issuance of a credit-linked note ) , which is collateralized by the assets owned by the spe . these derivative instruments are not considered variable interests under fin 46 ( r ) and any associated receivables are not included in the calculation of maximum exposure to the spe . structured investment vehicles structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) are spes that issue junior notes and senior debt ( medium-term notes and short-term commercial paper ) to fund the purchase of high quality assets . the junior notes are subject to the 201cfirst loss 201d risk of the sivs . the sivs provide a variable return to the junior note investors based on the net spread between the cost to issue the senior debt and the return realized by the high quality assets . the company acts as manager for the sivs and , prior to december 13 , 2007 , was not contractually obligated to provide liquidity facilities or guarantees to the sivs . in response to the ratings review of the outstanding senior debt of the sivs for a possible downgrade announced by two ratings agencies and the continued reduction of liquidity in the siv-related asset-backed commercial paper and medium-term note markets , on december 13 , 2007 , citigroup announced its commitment to provide support facilities that would support the sivs 2019 senior debt ratings . as a result of this commitment , citigroup became the sivs 2019 primary beneficiary and began consolidating these entities . on february 12 , 2008 , citigroup finalized the terms of the support facilities , which took the form of a commitment to provide $ 3.5 billion of mezzanine capital to the sivs in the event the market value of their junior notes approaches zero . the mezzanine capital facility was increased by $ 1 billion to $ 4.5 billion , with the additional commitment funded during the fourth quarter of 2008 . the facilities rank senior to the junior notes but junior to the commercial paper and medium-term notes . the facilities were at arm 2019s-length terms . interest was paid on the drawn amount of the facilities and a per annum fee was paid on the unused portion . during the period to november 18 , 2008 , the company wrote down $ 3.3 billion on siv assets . in order to complete the wind-down of the sivs , the company , in a nearly cashless transaction , purchased the remaining assets of the sivs at fair value , with a trade date of november 18 , 2008 . the company funded the purchase of the siv assets by assuming the obligation to pay amounts due under the medium-term notes issued by the sivs , as the medium-term notes mature . the net funding provided by the company to fund the purchase of the siv assets was $ 0.3 billion . as of december 31 , 2008 , the carrying amount of the purchased siv assets was $ 16.6 billion , of which $ 16.5 billion is classified as htm assets . investment funds the company is the investment manager for certain investment funds that invest in various asset classes including private equity , hedge funds , real estate , fixed income and infrastructure . the company earns a management fee , which is a percentage of capital under management , and may earn performance fees . in addition , for some of these funds the company has an ownership interest in the investment funds . the company has also established a number of investment funds as opportunities for qualified employees to invest in private equity investments . the company acts as investment manager to these funds and may provide employees with financing on both a recourse and non-recourse basis for a portion of the employees 2019 investment commitments. .
Question: what was the net change in proceeds from new securitizations from 2007 to 2008?
Answer: -9.3
Question: what is the net change divided by the 2007 value?
| -0.88571 |
CONVFINQA5548 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
each clearing firm is required to deposit and maintain balances in the form of cash , u.s . government securities , certain foreign government securities , bank letters of credit or other approved investments to satisfy performance bond and guaranty fund requirements . all non-cash deposits are marked-to-market and haircut on a daily basis . securities deposited by the clearing firms are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements and the clearing house does not earn any interest on these deposits . these balances may fluctuate significantly over time due to investment choices available to clearing firms and changes in the amount of contributions required . in addition , the rules and regulations of cbot require that collateral be provided for delivery of physical commodities , maintenance of capital requirements and deposits on pending arbitration matters . to satisfy these requirements , clearing firms that have accounts that trade certain cbot products have deposited cash , u.s . treasury securities or letters of credit . the clearing house marks-to-market open positions at least once a day ( twice a day for futures and options contracts ) , and require payment from clearing firms whose positions have lost value and make payments to clearing firms whose positions have gained value . the clearing house has the capability to mark-to-market more frequently as market conditions warrant . under the extremely unlikely scenario of simultaneous default by every clearing firm who has open positions with unrealized losses , the maximum exposure related to positions other than credit default and interest rate swap contracts would be one half day of changes in fair value of all open positions , before considering the clearing houses 2019 ability to access defaulting clearing firms 2019 collateral deposits . for cleared credit default swap and interest rate swap contracts , the maximum exposure related to cme 2019s guarantee would be one full day of changes in fair value of all open positions , before considering cme 2019s ability to access defaulting clearing firms 2019 collateral . during 2017 , the clearing house transferred an average of approximately $ 2.4 billion a day through the clearing system for settlement from clearing firms whose positions had lost value to clearing firms whose positions had gained value . the clearing house reduces the guarantee exposure through initial and maintenance performance bond requirements and mandatory guaranty fund contributions . the company believes that the guarantee liability is immaterial and therefore has not recorded any liability at december 31 , 2017 . at december 31 , 2016 , performance bond and guaranty fund contribution assets on the consolidated balance sheets included cash as well as u.s . treasury and u.s . government agency securities with maturity dates of 90 days or less . the u.s . treasury and u.s . government agency securities were purchased by cme , at its discretion , using cash collateral . the benefits , including interest earned , and risks of ownership accrue to cme . interest earned is included in investment income on the consolidated statements of income . there were no u.s . treasury and u.s . government agency securities held at december 31 , 2017 . the amortized cost and fair value of these securities at december 31 , 2016 were as follows : ( in millions ) amortized . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2016 amortizedcost</td><td>2016 fairvalue</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . treasury securities</td><td>$ 5548.9</td><td>$ 5549.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . government agency securities</td><td>1228.3</td><td>1228.3</td></tr></table> cme has been designated as a systemically important financial market utility by the financial stability oversight council and maintains a cash account at the federal reserve bank of chicago . at december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , cme maintained $ 34.2 billion and $ 6.2 billion , respectively , within the cash account at the federal reserve bank of chicago . clearing firms , at their option , may instruct cme to deposit the cash held by cme into one of the ief programs . the total principal in the ief programs was $ 1.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 and $ 6.8 billion at december 31 .
Question: what was the total cash balance at the federal reserve bank of chicago for 12/31/17 and 12/31/16?
| 40.4 |
CONVFINQA5549 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
each clearing firm is required to deposit and maintain balances in the form of cash , u.s . government securities , certain foreign government securities , bank letters of credit or other approved investments to satisfy performance bond and guaranty fund requirements . all non-cash deposits are marked-to-market and haircut on a daily basis . securities deposited by the clearing firms are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements and the clearing house does not earn any interest on these deposits . these balances may fluctuate significantly over time due to investment choices available to clearing firms and changes in the amount of contributions required . in addition , the rules and regulations of cbot require that collateral be provided for delivery of physical commodities , maintenance of capital requirements and deposits on pending arbitration matters . to satisfy these requirements , clearing firms that have accounts that trade certain cbot products have deposited cash , u.s . treasury securities or letters of credit . the clearing house marks-to-market open positions at least once a day ( twice a day for futures and options contracts ) , and require payment from clearing firms whose positions have lost value and make payments to clearing firms whose positions have gained value . the clearing house has the capability to mark-to-market more frequently as market conditions warrant . under the extremely unlikely scenario of simultaneous default by every clearing firm who has open positions with unrealized losses , the maximum exposure related to positions other than credit default and interest rate swap contracts would be one half day of changes in fair value of all open positions , before considering the clearing houses 2019 ability to access defaulting clearing firms 2019 collateral deposits . for cleared credit default swap and interest rate swap contracts , the maximum exposure related to cme 2019s guarantee would be one full day of changes in fair value of all open positions , before considering cme 2019s ability to access defaulting clearing firms 2019 collateral . during 2017 , the clearing house transferred an average of approximately $ 2.4 billion a day through the clearing system for settlement from clearing firms whose positions had lost value to clearing firms whose positions had gained value . the clearing house reduces the guarantee exposure through initial and maintenance performance bond requirements and mandatory guaranty fund contributions . the company believes that the guarantee liability is immaterial and therefore has not recorded any liability at december 31 , 2017 . at december 31 , 2016 , performance bond and guaranty fund contribution assets on the consolidated balance sheets included cash as well as u.s . treasury and u.s . government agency securities with maturity dates of 90 days or less . the u.s . treasury and u.s . government agency securities were purchased by cme , at its discretion , using cash collateral . the benefits , including interest earned , and risks of ownership accrue to cme . interest earned is included in investment income on the consolidated statements of income . there were no u.s . treasury and u.s . government agency securities held at december 31 , 2017 . the amortized cost and fair value of these securities at december 31 , 2016 were as follows : ( in millions ) amortized . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2016 amortizedcost</td><td>2016 fairvalue</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . treasury securities</td><td>$ 5548.9</td><td>$ 5549.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . government agency securities</td><td>1228.3</td><td>1228.3</td></tr></table> cme has been designated as a systemically important financial market utility by the financial stability oversight council and maintains a cash account at the federal reserve bank of chicago . at december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , cme maintained $ 34.2 billion and $ 6.2 billion , respectively , within the cash account at the federal reserve bank of chicago . clearing firms , at their option , may instruct cme to deposit the cash held by cme into one of the ief programs . the total principal in the ief programs was $ 1.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 and $ 6.8 billion at december 31 .
Question: what was the total cash balance at the federal reserve bank of chicago for 12/31/17 and 12/31/16?
Answer: 40.4
Question: so what was the average balance during this time?
| 20.2 |
CONVFINQA5550 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
each clearing firm is required to deposit and maintain balances in the form of cash , u.s . government securities , certain foreign government securities , bank letters of credit or other approved investments to satisfy performance bond and guaranty fund requirements . all non-cash deposits are marked-to-market and haircut on a daily basis . securities deposited by the clearing firms are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements and the clearing house does not earn any interest on these deposits . these balances may fluctuate significantly over time due to investment choices available to clearing firms and changes in the amount of contributions required . in addition , the rules and regulations of cbot require that collateral be provided for delivery of physical commodities , maintenance of capital requirements and deposits on pending arbitration matters . to satisfy these requirements , clearing firms that have accounts that trade certain cbot products have deposited cash , u.s . treasury securities or letters of credit . the clearing house marks-to-market open positions at least once a day ( twice a day for futures and options contracts ) , and require payment from clearing firms whose positions have lost value and make payments to clearing firms whose positions have gained value . the clearing house has the capability to mark-to-market more frequently as market conditions warrant . under the extremely unlikely scenario of simultaneous default by every clearing firm who has open positions with unrealized losses , the maximum exposure related to positions other than credit default and interest rate swap contracts would be one half day of changes in fair value of all open positions , before considering the clearing houses 2019 ability to access defaulting clearing firms 2019 collateral deposits . for cleared credit default swap and interest rate swap contracts , the maximum exposure related to cme 2019s guarantee would be one full day of changes in fair value of all open positions , before considering cme 2019s ability to access defaulting clearing firms 2019 collateral . during 2017 , the clearing house transferred an average of approximately $ 2.4 billion a day through the clearing system for settlement from clearing firms whose positions had lost value to clearing firms whose positions had gained value . the clearing house reduces the guarantee exposure through initial and maintenance performance bond requirements and mandatory guaranty fund contributions . the company believes that the guarantee liability is immaterial and therefore has not recorded any liability at december 31 , 2017 . at december 31 , 2016 , performance bond and guaranty fund contribution assets on the consolidated balance sheets included cash as well as u.s . treasury and u.s . government agency securities with maturity dates of 90 days or less . the u.s . treasury and u.s . government agency securities were purchased by cme , at its discretion , using cash collateral . the benefits , including interest earned , and risks of ownership accrue to cme . interest earned is included in investment income on the consolidated statements of income . there were no u.s . treasury and u.s . government agency securities held at december 31 , 2017 . the amortized cost and fair value of these securities at december 31 , 2016 were as follows : ( in millions ) amortized . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2016 amortizedcost</td><td>2016 fairvalue</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . treasury securities</td><td>$ 5548.9</td><td>$ 5549.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . government agency securities</td><td>1228.3</td><td>1228.3</td></tr></table> cme has been designated as a systemically important financial market utility by the financial stability oversight council and maintains a cash account at the federal reserve bank of chicago . at december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , cme maintained $ 34.2 billion and $ 6.2 billion , respectively , within the cash account at the federal reserve bank of chicago . clearing firms , at their option , may instruct cme to deposit the cash held by cme into one of the ief programs . the total principal in the ief programs was $ 1.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 and $ 6.8 billion at december 31 .
Question: what was the total cash balance at the federal reserve bank of chicago for 12/31/17 and 12/31/16?
Answer: 40.4
Question: so what was the average balance during this time?
Answer: 20.2
Question: what was the total amount of cash held at the federal reserve bank of chicago for cme as of 12/31/16?
| 13.0 |
CONVFINQA5551 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the audited consolidated financial statements director stock compensation subplan eastman's 2016 director stock compensation subplan ( "directors' subplan" ) , a component of the 2012 omnibus plan , remains in effect until terminated by the board of directors or the earlier termination of thf e 2012 omnibus plan . the directors' subplan provides for structured awards of restricted shares to non-employee members of the board of directors . restricted shares awarded under the directors' subplan are subject to the same terms and conditions of the 2012 omnibus plan . the directors' subplan does not constitute a separate source of shares for grant of equity awards and all shares awarded are part of the 10 million shares authorized under the 2012 omnibus plan . shares of restricted stock are granted on the first day of a non-f employee director's initial term of service and shares of restricted stock are granted each year to each non-employee director on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders . general the company is authorized by the board of directors under the 2012 omnibus plan tof provide awards to employees and non- employee members of the board of directors . it has been the company's practice to issue new shares rather than treasury shares for equity awards that require settlement by the issuance of common stock and to withhold or accept back shares awarded to cover the related income tax obligations of employee participants . shares of unrestricted common stock owned by non-d employee directors are not eligible to be withheld or acquired to satisfy the withholding obligation related to their income taxes . aa shares of unrestricted common stock owned by specified senior management level employees are accepted by the company to pay the exercise price of stock options in accordance with the terms and conditions of their awards . for 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , total share-based compensation expense ( before tax ) of approximately $ 36 million , $ 36 million , and $ 28 million , respectively , was recognized in selling , general and administrative exd pense in the consolidated statements of earnings , comprehensive income and retained earnings for all share-based awards of which approximately $ 7 million , $ 7 million , and $ 4 million , respectively , related to stock options . the compensation expense is recognized over the substantive vesting period , which may be a shorter time period than the stated vesting period for qualifying termination eligible employees as defined in the forms of award notice . for 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , approximately $ 2 million , $ 2 million , and $ 1 million , respectively , of stock option compensation expense was recognized due to qualifying termination eligibility preceding the requisite vesting period . stock option awards options have been granted on an annual basis to non-employee directors under the directors' subplan and predecessor plans and by the compensation and management development committee of the board of directors under the 2012 omnibus plan and predecessor plans to employees . option awards have an exercise price equal to the closing price of the company's stock on the date of grant . the term of options is 10 years with vesting periods thf at vary up to three years . vesting usually occurs ratably over the vesting period or at the end of the vesting period . the company utilizes the black scholes merton option valuation model which relies on certain assumptions to estimate an option's fair value . the weighted average assumptions used in the determination of fair value for stock options awarded in 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 are provided in the table below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>assumptions</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility rate</td><td>23.71% ( 23.71 % )</td><td>24.11% ( 24.11 % )</td><td>25.82% ( 25.82 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>2.31% ( 2.31 % )</td><td>1.75% ( 1.75 % )</td><td>1.70% ( 1.70 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>average risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.23% ( 1.23 % )</td><td>1.45% ( 1.45 % )</td><td>1.44% ( 1.44 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected term years</td><td>5.0</td><td>4.8</td><td>4.7</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the sum of the stock option compensation expense was recognized due to qualifying termination eligibility in 2015 and 2016?
| 4.0 |
CONVFINQA5552 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the audited consolidated financial statements director stock compensation subplan eastman's 2016 director stock compensation subplan ( "directors' subplan" ) , a component of the 2012 omnibus plan , remains in effect until terminated by the board of directors or the earlier termination of thf e 2012 omnibus plan . the directors' subplan provides for structured awards of restricted shares to non-employee members of the board of directors . restricted shares awarded under the directors' subplan are subject to the same terms and conditions of the 2012 omnibus plan . the directors' subplan does not constitute a separate source of shares for grant of equity awards and all shares awarded are part of the 10 million shares authorized under the 2012 omnibus plan . shares of restricted stock are granted on the first day of a non-f employee director's initial term of service and shares of restricted stock are granted each year to each non-employee director on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders . general the company is authorized by the board of directors under the 2012 omnibus plan tof provide awards to employees and non- employee members of the board of directors . it has been the company's practice to issue new shares rather than treasury shares for equity awards that require settlement by the issuance of common stock and to withhold or accept back shares awarded to cover the related income tax obligations of employee participants . shares of unrestricted common stock owned by non-d employee directors are not eligible to be withheld or acquired to satisfy the withholding obligation related to their income taxes . aa shares of unrestricted common stock owned by specified senior management level employees are accepted by the company to pay the exercise price of stock options in accordance with the terms and conditions of their awards . for 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , total share-based compensation expense ( before tax ) of approximately $ 36 million , $ 36 million , and $ 28 million , respectively , was recognized in selling , general and administrative exd pense in the consolidated statements of earnings , comprehensive income and retained earnings for all share-based awards of which approximately $ 7 million , $ 7 million , and $ 4 million , respectively , related to stock options . the compensation expense is recognized over the substantive vesting period , which may be a shorter time period than the stated vesting period for qualifying termination eligible employees as defined in the forms of award notice . for 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , approximately $ 2 million , $ 2 million , and $ 1 million , respectively , of stock option compensation expense was recognized due to qualifying termination eligibility preceding the requisite vesting period . stock option awards options have been granted on an annual basis to non-employee directors under the directors' subplan and predecessor plans and by the compensation and management development committee of the board of directors under the 2012 omnibus plan and predecessor plans to employees . option awards have an exercise price equal to the closing price of the company's stock on the date of grant . the term of options is 10 years with vesting periods thf at vary up to three years . vesting usually occurs ratably over the vesting period or at the end of the vesting period . the company utilizes the black scholes merton option valuation model which relies on certain assumptions to estimate an option's fair value . the weighted average assumptions used in the determination of fair value for stock options awarded in 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 are provided in the table below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>assumptions</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility rate</td><td>23.71% ( 23.71 % )</td><td>24.11% ( 24.11 % )</td><td>25.82% ( 25.82 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>2.31% ( 2.31 % )</td><td>1.75% ( 1.75 % )</td><td>1.70% ( 1.70 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>average risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.23% ( 1.23 % )</td><td>1.45% ( 1.45 % )</td><td>1.44% ( 1.44 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected term years</td><td>5.0</td><td>4.8</td><td>4.7</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the sum of the stock option compensation expense was recognized due to qualifying termination eligibility in 2015 and 2016?
Answer: 4.0
Question: what is the total sum including 2014?
| 5.0 |
CONVFINQA5553 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 89.49</td><td>$ 91.06</td><td>$ 87.88</td><td>$ 70.48</td><td>$ 75.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.91</td><td>$ 121.48</td><td>$ 128.15</td><td>$ 80.74</td><td>$ 102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 111.65</td><td>$ 122.61</td><td>$ 124.35</td><td>$ 97.72</td><td>$ 115.88</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of the s&p in 2006 less the initial investment?
| 21.48 |
CONVFINQA5554 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 89.49</td><td>$ 91.06</td><td>$ 87.88</td><td>$ 70.48</td><td>$ 75.95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 104.91</td><td>$ 121.48</td><td>$ 128.15</td><td>$ 80.74</td><td>$ 102.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 111.65</td><td>$ 122.61</td><td>$ 124.35</td><td>$ 97.72</td><td>$ 115.88</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of the s&p in 2006 less the initial investment?
Answer: 21.48
Question: what was the percent change?
| 0.2148 |
CONVFINQA5555 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is the difference between the prices of refined products sold and the costs of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks refined , including the costs to transport these inputs to our refineries , the costs of purchased products and manufacturing expenses , including depreciation . the crack spread is a measure of the difference between market prices for refined products and crude oil , commonly used by the industry as a proxy for the refining margin . crack spreads can fluctuate significantly , particularly when prices of refined products do not move in the same relationship as the cost of crude oil . as a performance benchmark and a comparison with other industry participants , we calculate midwest ( chicago ) and u.s . gulf coast crack spreads that we feel most closely track our operations and slate of products . posted light louisiana sweet ( 201clls 201d ) prices and a 6-3-2-1 ratio of products ( 6 barrels of crude oil producing 3 barrels of gasoline , 2 barrels of distillate and 1 barrel of residual fuel ) are used for the crack spread calculation . our refineries can process significant amounts of sour crude oil which typically can be purchased at a discount to sweet crude oil . the amount of this discount , the sweet/sour differential , can vary significantly causing our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin to differ from the crack spreads which are based upon sweet crude . in general , a larger sweet/sour differential will enhance our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin . in 2009 , the sweet/sour differential narrowed , due to a variety of worldwide economic and petroleum industry related factors , primarily related to lower hydrocarbon demand . sour crude accounted for 50 percent , 52 percent and 54 percent of our crude oil processed in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . the following table lists calculated average crack spreads for the midwest ( chicago ) and gulf coast markets and the sweet/sour differential for the past three years . ( dollars per barrel ) 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars per barrel )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>chicago lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 3.52</td><td>$ 3.27</td><td>$ 8.87</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . gulf coast lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ 2.45</td><td>$ 6.42</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>sweet/sour differential ( a )</td><td>$ 5.82</td><td>$ 11.99</td><td>$ 11.59</td></tr></table> sweet/sour differential ( a ) $ 5.82 $ 11.99 $ 11.59 ( a ) calculated using the following mix of crude types as compared to lls. : 15% ( 15 % ) arab light , 20% ( 20 % ) kuwait , 10% ( 10 % ) maya , 15% ( 15 % ) western canadian select , 40% ( 40 % ) mars . in addition to the market changes indicated by the crack spreads and sweet/sour differential , our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is impacted by factors such as : 2022 the types of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks processed , 2022 the selling prices realized for refined products , 2022 the impact of commodity derivative instruments used to manage price risk , 2022 the cost of products purchased for resale , and 2022 changes in manufacturing costs , which include depreciation . manufacturing costs are primarily driven by the cost of energy used by our refineries and the level of maintenance costs . planned turnaround and major maintenance activities were completed at our catlettsburg , garyville , and robinson refineries in 2009 . we performed turnaround and major maintenance activities at our robinson , catlettsburg , garyville and canton refineries in 2008 and at our catlettsburg , robinson and st . paul park refineries in 2007 . our retail marketing gross margin for gasoline and distillates , which is the difference between the ultimate price paid by consumers and the cost of refined products , including secondary transportation and consumer excise taxes , also impacts rm&t segment profitability . there are numerous factors including local competition , seasonal demand fluctuations , the available wholesale supply , the level of economic activity in our marketing areas and weather conditions that impact gasoline and distillate demand throughout the year . refined product demand increased for several years until 2008 when it decreased due to the combination of significant increases in retail petroleum prices , a broad slowdown in general economic activity , and the impact of increased ethanol blending into gasoline . in 2009 refined product demand continued to decline . for our marketing area , we estimate a gasoline demand decline of about one percent and a distillate demand decline of about 12 percent from 2008 levels . market demand declines for gasoline and distillates generally reduce the product margin we can realize . we also estimate gasoline and distillate demand in our marketing area decreased about three percent in 2008 compared to 2007 levels . the gross margin on merchandise sold at retail outlets has been historically less volatile. .
Question: what is the net change in the percentage of sour crude accounted as a percent of the crude oil processed from 2008 to 2009?
| 2.0 |
CONVFINQA5556 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is the difference between the prices of refined products sold and the costs of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks refined , including the costs to transport these inputs to our refineries , the costs of purchased products and manufacturing expenses , including depreciation . the crack spread is a measure of the difference between market prices for refined products and crude oil , commonly used by the industry as a proxy for the refining margin . crack spreads can fluctuate significantly , particularly when prices of refined products do not move in the same relationship as the cost of crude oil . as a performance benchmark and a comparison with other industry participants , we calculate midwest ( chicago ) and u.s . gulf coast crack spreads that we feel most closely track our operations and slate of products . posted light louisiana sweet ( 201clls 201d ) prices and a 6-3-2-1 ratio of products ( 6 barrels of crude oil producing 3 barrels of gasoline , 2 barrels of distillate and 1 barrel of residual fuel ) are used for the crack spread calculation . our refineries can process significant amounts of sour crude oil which typically can be purchased at a discount to sweet crude oil . the amount of this discount , the sweet/sour differential , can vary significantly causing our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin to differ from the crack spreads which are based upon sweet crude . in general , a larger sweet/sour differential will enhance our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin . in 2009 , the sweet/sour differential narrowed , due to a variety of worldwide economic and petroleum industry related factors , primarily related to lower hydrocarbon demand . sour crude accounted for 50 percent , 52 percent and 54 percent of our crude oil processed in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . the following table lists calculated average crack spreads for the midwest ( chicago ) and gulf coast markets and the sweet/sour differential for the past three years . ( dollars per barrel ) 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars per barrel )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>chicago lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 3.52</td><td>$ 3.27</td><td>$ 8.87</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . gulf coast lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ 2.45</td><td>$ 6.42</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>sweet/sour differential ( a )</td><td>$ 5.82</td><td>$ 11.99</td><td>$ 11.59</td></tr></table> sweet/sour differential ( a ) $ 5.82 $ 11.99 $ 11.59 ( a ) calculated using the following mix of crude types as compared to lls. : 15% ( 15 % ) arab light , 20% ( 20 % ) kuwait , 10% ( 10 % ) maya , 15% ( 15 % ) western canadian select , 40% ( 40 % ) mars . in addition to the market changes indicated by the crack spreads and sweet/sour differential , our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is impacted by factors such as : 2022 the types of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks processed , 2022 the selling prices realized for refined products , 2022 the impact of commodity derivative instruments used to manage price risk , 2022 the cost of products purchased for resale , and 2022 changes in manufacturing costs , which include depreciation . manufacturing costs are primarily driven by the cost of energy used by our refineries and the level of maintenance costs . planned turnaround and major maintenance activities were completed at our catlettsburg , garyville , and robinson refineries in 2009 . we performed turnaround and major maintenance activities at our robinson , catlettsburg , garyville and canton refineries in 2008 and at our catlettsburg , robinson and st . paul park refineries in 2007 . our retail marketing gross margin for gasoline and distillates , which is the difference between the ultimate price paid by consumers and the cost of refined products , including secondary transportation and consumer excise taxes , also impacts rm&t segment profitability . there are numerous factors including local competition , seasonal demand fluctuations , the available wholesale supply , the level of economic activity in our marketing areas and weather conditions that impact gasoline and distillate demand throughout the year . refined product demand increased for several years until 2008 when it decreased due to the combination of significant increases in retail petroleum prices , a broad slowdown in general economic activity , and the impact of increased ethanol blending into gasoline . in 2009 refined product demand continued to decline . for our marketing area , we estimate a gasoline demand decline of about one percent and a distillate demand decline of about 12 percent from 2008 levels . market demand declines for gasoline and distillates generally reduce the product margin we can realize . we also estimate gasoline and distillate demand in our marketing area decreased about three percent in 2008 compared to 2007 levels . the gross margin on merchandise sold at retail outlets has been historically less volatile. .
Question: what is the net change in the percentage of sour crude accounted as a percent of the crude oil processed from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 2.0
Question: what is the average crack spread for the midwest ( chicago) in 2009?
| 3.52 |
CONVFINQA5557 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is the difference between the prices of refined products sold and the costs of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks refined , including the costs to transport these inputs to our refineries , the costs of purchased products and manufacturing expenses , including depreciation . the crack spread is a measure of the difference between market prices for refined products and crude oil , commonly used by the industry as a proxy for the refining margin . crack spreads can fluctuate significantly , particularly when prices of refined products do not move in the same relationship as the cost of crude oil . as a performance benchmark and a comparison with other industry participants , we calculate midwest ( chicago ) and u.s . gulf coast crack spreads that we feel most closely track our operations and slate of products . posted light louisiana sweet ( 201clls 201d ) prices and a 6-3-2-1 ratio of products ( 6 barrels of crude oil producing 3 barrels of gasoline , 2 barrels of distillate and 1 barrel of residual fuel ) are used for the crack spread calculation . our refineries can process significant amounts of sour crude oil which typically can be purchased at a discount to sweet crude oil . the amount of this discount , the sweet/sour differential , can vary significantly causing our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin to differ from the crack spreads which are based upon sweet crude . in general , a larger sweet/sour differential will enhance our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin . in 2009 , the sweet/sour differential narrowed , due to a variety of worldwide economic and petroleum industry related factors , primarily related to lower hydrocarbon demand . sour crude accounted for 50 percent , 52 percent and 54 percent of our crude oil processed in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . the following table lists calculated average crack spreads for the midwest ( chicago ) and gulf coast markets and the sweet/sour differential for the past three years . ( dollars per barrel ) 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars per barrel )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>chicago lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 3.52</td><td>$ 3.27</td><td>$ 8.87</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . gulf coast lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ 2.45</td><td>$ 6.42</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>sweet/sour differential ( a )</td><td>$ 5.82</td><td>$ 11.99</td><td>$ 11.59</td></tr></table> sweet/sour differential ( a ) $ 5.82 $ 11.99 $ 11.59 ( a ) calculated using the following mix of crude types as compared to lls. : 15% ( 15 % ) arab light , 20% ( 20 % ) kuwait , 10% ( 10 % ) maya , 15% ( 15 % ) western canadian select , 40% ( 40 % ) mars . in addition to the market changes indicated by the crack spreads and sweet/sour differential , our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is impacted by factors such as : 2022 the types of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks processed , 2022 the selling prices realized for refined products , 2022 the impact of commodity derivative instruments used to manage price risk , 2022 the cost of products purchased for resale , and 2022 changes in manufacturing costs , which include depreciation . manufacturing costs are primarily driven by the cost of energy used by our refineries and the level of maintenance costs . planned turnaround and major maintenance activities were completed at our catlettsburg , garyville , and robinson refineries in 2009 . we performed turnaround and major maintenance activities at our robinson , catlettsburg , garyville and canton refineries in 2008 and at our catlettsburg , robinson and st . paul park refineries in 2007 . our retail marketing gross margin for gasoline and distillates , which is the difference between the ultimate price paid by consumers and the cost of refined products , including secondary transportation and consumer excise taxes , also impacts rm&t segment profitability . there are numerous factors including local competition , seasonal demand fluctuations , the available wholesale supply , the level of economic activity in our marketing areas and weather conditions that impact gasoline and distillate demand throughout the year . refined product demand increased for several years until 2008 when it decreased due to the combination of significant increases in retail petroleum prices , a broad slowdown in general economic activity , and the impact of increased ethanol blending into gasoline . in 2009 refined product demand continued to decline . for our marketing area , we estimate a gasoline demand decline of about one percent and a distillate demand decline of about 12 percent from 2008 levels . market demand declines for gasoline and distillates generally reduce the product margin we can realize . we also estimate gasoline and distillate demand in our marketing area decreased about three percent in 2008 compared to 2007 levels . the gross margin on merchandise sold at retail outlets has been historically less volatile. .
Question: what is the net change in the percentage of sour crude accounted as a percent of the crude oil processed from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 2.0
Question: what is the average crack spread for the midwest ( chicago) in 2009?
Answer: 3.52
Question: what about in 2007?
| 8.87 |
CONVFINQA5558 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is the difference between the prices of refined products sold and the costs of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks refined , including the costs to transport these inputs to our refineries , the costs of purchased products and manufacturing expenses , including depreciation . the crack spread is a measure of the difference between market prices for refined products and crude oil , commonly used by the industry as a proxy for the refining margin . crack spreads can fluctuate significantly , particularly when prices of refined products do not move in the same relationship as the cost of crude oil . as a performance benchmark and a comparison with other industry participants , we calculate midwest ( chicago ) and u.s . gulf coast crack spreads that we feel most closely track our operations and slate of products . posted light louisiana sweet ( 201clls 201d ) prices and a 6-3-2-1 ratio of products ( 6 barrels of crude oil producing 3 barrels of gasoline , 2 barrels of distillate and 1 barrel of residual fuel ) are used for the crack spread calculation . our refineries can process significant amounts of sour crude oil which typically can be purchased at a discount to sweet crude oil . the amount of this discount , the sweet/sour differential , can vary significantly causing our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin to differ from the crack spreads which are based upon sweet crude . in general , a larger sweet/sour differential will enhance our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin . in 2009 , the sweet/sour differential narrowed , due to a variety of worldwide economic and petroleum industry related factors , primarily related to lower hydrocarbon demand . sour crude accounted for 50 percent , 52 percent and 54 percent of our crude oil processed in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . the following table lists calculated average crack spreads for the midwest ( chicago ) and gulf coast markets and the sweet/sour differential for the past three years . ( dollars per barrel ) 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars per barrel )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>chicago lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 3.52</td><td>$ 3.27</td><td>$ 8.87</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . gulf coast lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ 2.45</td><td>$ 6.42</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>sweet/sour differential ( a )</td><td>$ 5.82</td><td>$ 11.99</td><td>$ 11.59</td></tr></table> sweet/sour differential ( a ) $ 5.82 $ 11.99 $ 11.59 ( a ) calculated using the following mix of crude types as compared to lls. : 15% ( 15 % ) arab light , 20% ( 20 % ) kuwait , 10% ( 10 % ) maya , 15% ( 15 % ) western canadian select , 40% ( 40 % ) mars . in addition to the market changes indicated by the crack spreads and sweet/sour differential , our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is impacted by factors such as : 2022 the types of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks processed , 2022 the selling prices realized for refined products , 2022 the impact of commodity derivative instruments used to manage price risk , 2022 the cost of products purchased for resale , and 2022 changes in manufacturing costs , which include depreciation . manufacturing costs are primarily driven by the cost of energy used by our refineries and the level of maintenance costs . planned turnaround and major maintenance activities were completed at our catlettsburg , garyville , and robinson refineries in 2009 . we performed turnaround and major maintenance activities at our robinson , catlettsburg , garyville and canton refineries in 2008 and at our catlettsburg , robinson and st . paul park refineries in 2007 . our retail marketing gross margin for gasoline and distillates , which is the difference between the ultimate price paid by consumers and the cost of refined products , including secondary transportation and consumer excise taxes , also impacts rm&t segment profitability . there are numerous factors including local competition , seasonal demand fluctuations , the available wholesale supply , the level of economic activity in our marketing areas and weather conditions that impact gasoline and distillate demand throughout the year . refined product demand increased for several years until 2008 when it decreased due to the combination of significant increases in retail petroleum prices , a broad slowdown in general economic activity , and the impact of increased ethanol blending into gasoline . in 2009 refined product demand continued to decline . for our marketing area , we estimate a gasoline demand decline of about one percent and a distillate demand decline of about 12 percent from 2008 levels . market demand declines for gasoline and distillates generally reduce the product margin we can realize . we also estimate gasoline and distillate demand in our marketing area decreased about three percent in 2008 compared to 2007 levels . the gross margin on merchandise sold at retail outlets has been historically less volatile. .
Question: what is the net change in the percentage of sour crude accounted as a percent of the crude oil processed from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 2.0
Question: what is the average crack spread for the midwest ( chicago) in 2009?
Answer: 3.52
Question: what about in 2007?
Answer: 8.87
Question: what is the net change?
| -5.35 |
CONVFINQA5559 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is the difference between the prices of refined products sold and the costs of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks refined , including the costs to transport these inputs to our refineries , the costs of purchased products and manufacturing expenses , including depreciation . the crack spread is a measure of the difference between market prices for refined products and crude oil , commonly used by the industry as a proxy for the refining margin . crack spreads can fluctuate significantly , particularly when prices of refined products do not move in the same relationship as the cost of crude oil . as a performance benchmark and a comparison with other industry participants , we calculate midwest ( chicago ) and u.s . gulf coast crack spreads that we feel most closely track our operations and slate of products . posted light louisiana sweet ( 201clls 201d ) prices and a 6-3-2-1 ratio of products ( 6 barrels of crude oil producing 3 barrels of gasoline , 2 barrels of distillate and 1 barrel of residual fuel ) are used for the crack spread calculation . our refineries can process significant amounts of sour crude oil which typically can be purchased at a discount to sweet crude oil . the amount of this discount , the sweet/sour differential , can vary significantly causing our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin to differ from the crack spreads which are based upon sweet crude . in general , a larger sweet/sour differential will enhance our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin . in 2009 , the sweet/sour differential narrowed , due to a variety of worldwide economic and petroleum industry related factors , primarily related to lower hydrocarbon demand . sour crude accounted for 50 percent , 52 percent and 54 percent of our crude oil processed in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . the following table lists calculated average crack spreads for the midwest ( chicago ) and gulf coast markets and the sweet/sour differential for the past three years . ( dollars per barrel ) 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars per barrel )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>chicago lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 3.52</td><td>$ 3.27</td><td>$ 8.87</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . gulf coast lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ 2.45</td><td>$ 6.42</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>sweet/sour differential ( a )</td><td>$ 5.82</td><td>$ 11.99</td><td>$ 11.59</td></tr></table> sweet/sour differential ( a ) $ 5.82 $ 11.99 $ 11.59 ( a ) calculated using the following mix of crude types as compared to lls. : 15% ( 15 % ) arab light , 20% ( 20 % ) kuwait , 10% ( 10 % ) maya , 15% ( 15 % ) western canadian select , 40% ( 40 % ) mars . in addition to the market changes indicated by the crack spreads and sweet/sour differential , our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is impacted by factors such as : 2022 the types of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks processed , 2022 the selling prices realized for refined products , 2022 the impact of commodity derivative instruments used to manage price risk , 2022 the cost of products purchased for resale , and 2022 changes in manufacturing costs , which include depreciation . manufacturing costs are primarily driven by the cost of energy used by our refineries and the level of maintenance costs . planned turnaround and major maintenance activities were completed at our catlettsburg , garyville , and robinson refineries in 2009 . we performed turnaround and major maintenance activities at our robinson , catlettsburg , garyville and canton refineries in 2008 and at our catlettsburg , robinson and st . paul park refineries in 2007 . our retail marketing gross margin for gasoline and distillates , which is the difference between the ultimate price paid by consumers and the cost of refined products , including secondary transportation and consumer excise taxes , also impacts rm&t segment profitability . there are numerous factors including local competition , seasonal demand fluctuations , the available wholesale supply , the level of economic activity in our marketing areas and weather conditions that impact gasoline and distillate demand throughout the year . refined product demand increased for several years until 2008 when it decreased due to the combination of significant increases in retail petroleum prices , a broad slowdown in general economic activity , and the impact of increased ethanol blending into gasoline . in 2009 refined product demand continued to decline . for our marketing area , we estimate a gasoline demand decline of about one percent and a distillate demand decline of about 12 percent from 2008 levels . market demand declines for gasoline and distillates generally reduce the product margin we can realize . we also estimate gasoline and distillate demand in our marketing area decreased about three percent in 2008 compared to 2007 levels . the gross margin on merchandise sold at retail outlets has been historically less volatile. .
Question: what is the net change in the percentage of sour crude accounted as a percent of the crude oil processed from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 2.0
Question: what is the average crack spread for the midwest ( chicago) in 2009?
Answer: 3.52
Question: what about in 2007?
Answer: 8.87
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -5.35
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| -0.60316 |
CONVFINQA5560 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
17 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 included $ 1635 million , net of $ 953 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 1997 million , net of $ 1121 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2017 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 398</td><td>$ 173</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>359</td><td>156</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>297</td><td>164</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>259</td><td>168</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022</td><td>221</td><td>147</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>1115</td><td>271</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 2649</td><td>$ 1079</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-187 ( 187 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum lease payments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 892</td></tr></table> approximately 97% ( 97 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 480 million in 2017 , $ 535 million in 2016 , and $ 590 million in 2015 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 18 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . to the extent possible , we have recorded a liability where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments . approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and approximately 5% ( 5 % ) is related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2017 . because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims , it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from approximately $ 285 million to $ 310 million . we record an accrual at the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any other . estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation. .
Question: what is the total value of operating leases?
| 2649.0 |
CONVFINQA5561 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
17 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 included $ 1635 million , net of $ 953 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 1997 million , net of $ 1121 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2017 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 398</td><td>$ 173</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>359</td><td>156</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>297</td><td>164</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>259</td><td>168</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022</td><td>221</td><td>147</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>1115</td><td>271</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 2649</td><td>$ 1079</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-187 ( 187 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum lease payments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 892</td></tr></table> approximately 97% ( 97 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 480 million in 2017 , $ 535 million in 2016 , and $ 590 million in 2015 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 18 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . to the extent possible , we have recorded a liability where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments . approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and approximately 5% ( 5 % ) is related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2017 . because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims , it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from approximately $ 285 million to $ 310 million . we record an accrual at the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any other . estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation. .
Question: what is the total value of operating leases?
Answer: 2649.0
Question: what is the total value of capital leases?
| 1079.0 |
CONVFINQA5562 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
17 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 included $ 1635 million , net of $ 953 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 1997 million , net of $ 1121 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2017 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 398</td><td>$ 173</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>359</td><td>156</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>297</td><td>164</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>259</td><td>168</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022</td><td>221</td><td>147</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>1115</td><td>271</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 2649</td><td>$ 1079</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-187 ( 187 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum lease payments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 892</td></tr></table> approximately 97% ( 97 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 480 million in 2017 , $ 535 million in 2016 , and $ 590 million in 2015 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 18 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . to the extent possible , we have recorded a liability where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments . approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and approximately 5% ( 5 % ) is related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2017 . because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims , it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from approximately $ 285 million to $ 310 million . we record an accrual at the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any other . estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation. .
Question: what is the total value of operating leases?
Answer: 2649.0
Question: what is the total value of capital leases?
Answer: 1079.0
Question: what is the sum?
| 3728.0 |
CONVFINQA5563 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
17 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 included $ 1635 million , net of $ 953 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 1997 million , net of $ 1121 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2017 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 398</td><td>$ 173</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>359</td><td>156</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>297</td><td>164</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>259</td><td>168</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022</td><td>221</td><td>147</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>1115</td><td>271</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 2649</td><td>$ 1079</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-187 ( 187 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum lease payments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 892</td></tr></table> approximately 97% ( 97 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 480 million in 2017 , $ 535 million in 2016 , and $ 590 million in 2015 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 18 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . to the extent possible , we have recorded a liability where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments . approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and approximately 5% ( 5 % ) is related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2017 . because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims , it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from approximately $ 285 million to $ 310 million . we record an accrual at the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any other . estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation. .
Question: what is the total value of operating leases?
Answer: 2649.0
Question: what is the total value of capital leases?
Answer: 1079.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 3728.0
Question: what is the value of operating leases divided by the total sum?
| 0.71057 |
CONVFINQA5564 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents interest expense , net of capitalized interest decreased $ 129 million , or 18.1% ( 18.1 % ) , in 2014 from the 2013 period primarily due to a $ 63 million decrease in special charges recognized period-over-period as further described below , as well as refinancing activities that resulted in $ 65 million less interest expense recognized in 2014 . in 2014 , american recognized $ 29 million of special charges relating to non-cash interest accretion on bankruptcy settlement obligations . in 2013 , american recognized $ 48 million of special charges relating to post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to american 2019s 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . in addition , in 2013 american recorded special charges of $ 44 million for debt extinguishment costs incurred as a result of the repayment of certain aircraft secured indebtedness , including cash interest charges and non-cash write offs of unamortized debt issuance costs . as a result of the 2013 refinancing activities and the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes in 2014 , american recognized $ 65 million less interest expense in 2014 as compared to the 2013 period . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 153 million in 2014 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 92 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 48 million . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 84 million in 2013 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 55 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 29 million . other nonoperating expense , net increased $ 69 million , or 81.0% ( 81.0 % ) , during 2014 primarily due to special charges recognized as a result of early debt extinguishment and an increase in foreign currency losses driven by the strengthening of the u.s . dollar in foreign currency transactions , principally in latin american markets . american recorded a $ 43 million special charge for venezuelan foreign currency losses in 2014 . see part ii , item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk for further discussion of our cash held in venezuelan bolivars . in addition , american 2019s nonoperating special items included $ 48 million in special charges in the 2014 primarily related to the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes and other indebtedness . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on american 2019s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2013 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )</td><td>$ 1733</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>320</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )</td><td>218</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>professional fees</td><td>199</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>170</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total reorganization items net</td><td>$ 2640</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , american agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds . the debtors recorded an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing or facility agreement when the applicable motion was filed with the bankruptcy court to reject or modify .
Question: what was the total amount in aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections in 2013?
| 320.0 |
CONVFINQA5565 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents interest expense , net of capitalized interest decreased $ 129 million , or 18.1% ( 18.1 % ) , in 2014 from the 2013 period primarily due to a $ 63 million decrease in special charges recognized period-over-period as further described below , as well as refinancing activities that resulted in $ 65 million less interest expense recognized in 2014 . in 2014 , american recognized $ 29 million of special charges relating to non-cash interest accretion on bankruptcy settlement obligations . in 2013 , american recognized $ 48 million of special charges relating to post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to american 2019s 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . in addition , in 2013 american recorded special charges of $ 44 million for debt extinguishment costs incurred as a result of the repayment of certain aircraft secured indebtedness , including cash interest charges and non-cash write offs of unamortized debt issuance costs . as a result of the 2013 refinancing activities and the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes in 2014 , american recognized $ 65 million less interest expense in 2014 as compared to the 2013 period . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 153 million in 2014 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 92 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 48 million . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 84 million in 2013 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 55 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 29 million . other nonoperating expense , net increased $ 69 million , or 81.0% ( 81.0 % ) , during 2014 primarily due to special charges recognized as a result of early debt extinguishment and an increase in foreign currency losses driven by the strengthening of the u.s . dollar in foreign currency transactions , principally in latin american markets . american recorded a $ 43 million special charge for venezuelan foreign currency losses in 2014 . see part ii , item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk for further discussion of our cash held in venezuelan bolivars . in addition , american 2019s nonoperating special items included $ 48 million in special charges in the 2014 primarily related to the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes and other indebtedness . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on american 2019s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2013 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )</td><td>$ 1733</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>320</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )</td><td>218</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>professional fees</td><td>199</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>170</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total reorganization items net</td><td>$ 2640</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , american agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds . the debtors recorded an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing or facility agreement when the applicable motion was filed with the bankruptcy court to reject or modify .
Question: what was the total amount in aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections in 2013?
Answer: 320.0
Question: and what was the value of the total reorganization items net?
| 2640.0 |
CONVFINQA5566 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents interest expense , net of capitalized interest decreased $ 129 million , or 18.1% ( 18.1 % ) , in 2014 from the 2013 period primarily due to a $ 63 million decrease in special charges recognized period-over-period as further described below , as well as refinancing activities that resulted in $ 65 million less interest expense recognized in 2014 . in 2014 , american recognized $ 29 million of special charges relating to non-cash interest accretion on bankruptcy settlement obligations . in 2013 , american recognized $ 48 million of special charges relating to post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to american 2019s 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . in addition , in 2013 american recorded special charges of $ 44 million for debt extinguishment costs incurred as a result of the repayment of certain aircraft secured indebtedness , including cash interest charges and non-cash write offs of unamortized debt issuance costs . as a result of the 2013 refinancing activities and the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes in 2014 , american recognized $ 65 million less interest expense in 2014 as compared to the 2013 period . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 153 million in 2014 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 92 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 48 million . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 84 million in 2013 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 55 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 29 million . other nonoperating expense , net increased $ 69 million , or 81.0% ( 81.0 % ) , during 2014 primarily due to special charges recognized as a result of early debt extinguishment and an increase in foreign currency losses driven by the strengthening of the u.s . dollar in foreign currency transactions , principally in latin american markets . american recorded a $ 43 million special charge for venezuelan foreign currency losses in 2014 . see part ii , item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk for further discussion of our cash held in venezuelan bolivars . in addition , american 2019s nonoperating special items included $ 48 million in special charges in the 2014 primarily related to the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes and other indebtedness . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on american 2019s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2013 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )</td><td>$ 1733</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>320</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )</td><td>218</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>professional fees</td><td>199</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>170</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total reorganization items net</td><td>$ 2640</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , american agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds . the debtors recorded an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing or facility agreement when the applicable motion was filed with the bankruptcy court to reject or modify .
Question: what was the total amount in aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections in 2013?
Answer: 320.0
Question: and what was the value of the total reorganization items net?
Answer: 2640.0
Question: how much, then, does that amount represent in relation to this value, in percentage?
| 0.12121 |
CONVFINQA5567 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents interest expense , net of capitalized interest decreased $ 129 million , or 18.1% ( 18.1 % ) , in 2014 from the 2013 period primarily due to a $ 63 million decrease in special charges recognized period-over-period as further described below , as well as refinancing activities that resulted in $ 65 million less interest expense recognized in 2014 . in 2014 , american recognized $ 29 million of special charges relating to non-cash interest accretion on bankruptcy settlement obligations . in 2013 , american recognized $ 48 million of special charges relating to post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to american 2019s 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . in addition , in 2013 american recorded special charges of $ 44 million for debt extinguishment costs incurred as a result of the repayment of certain aircraft secured indebtedness , including cash interest charges and non-cash write offs of unamortized debt issuance costs . as a result of the 2013 refinancing activities and the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes in 2014 , american recognized $ 65 million less interest expense in 2014 as compared to the 2013 period . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 153 million in 2014 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 92 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 48 million . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 84 million in 2013 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 55 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 29 million . other nonoperating expense , net increased $ 69 million , or 81.0% ( 81.0 % ) , during 2014 primarily due to special charges recognized as a result of early debt extinguishment and an increase in foreign currency losses driven by the strengthening of the u.s . dollar in foreign currency transactions , principally in latin american markets . american recorded a $ 43 million special charge for venezuelan foreign currency losses in 2014 . see part ii , item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk for further discussion of our cash held in venezuelan bolivars . in addition , american 2019s nonoperating special items included $ 48 million in special charges in the 2014 primarily related to the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes and other indebtedness . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on american 2019s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2013 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )</td><td>$ 1733</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>320</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )</td><td>218</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>professional fees</td><td>199</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>170</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total reorganization items net</td><td>$ 2640</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , american agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds . the debtors recorded an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing or facility agreement when the applicable motion was filed with the bankruptcy court to reject or modify .
Question: what was the total amount in aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections in 2013?
Answer: 320.0
Question: and what was the value of the total reorganization items net?
Answer: 2640.0
Question: how much, then, does that amount represent in relation to this value, in percentage?
Answer: 0.12121
Question: in that same year, what was the total in professional fees?
| 199.0 |
CONVFINQA5568 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents interest expense , net of capitalized interest decreased $ 129 million , or 18.1% ( 18.1 % ) , in 2014 from the 2013 period primarily due to a $ 63 million decrease in special charges recognized period-over-period as further described below , as well as refinancing activities that resulted in $ 65 million less interest expense recognized in 2014 . in 2014 , american recognized $ 29 million of special charges relating to non-cash interest accretion on bankruptcy settlement obligations . in 2013 , american recognized $ 48 million of special charges relating to post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to american 2019s 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . in addition , in 2013 american recorded special charges of $ 44 million for debt extinguishment costs incurred as a result of the repayment of certain aircraft secured indebtedness , including cash interest charges and non-cash write offs of unamortized debt issuance costs . as a result of the 2013 refinancing activities and the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes in 2014 , american recognized $ 65 million less interest expense in 2014 as compared to the 2013 period . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 153 million in 2014 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 92 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 48 million . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 84 million in 2013 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 55 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 29 million . other nonoperating expense , net increased $ 69 million , or 81.0% ( 81.0 % ) , during 2014 primarily due to special charges recognized as a result of early debt extinguishment and an increase in foreign currency losses driven by the strengthening of the u.s . dollar in foreign currency transactions , principally in latin american markets . american recorded a $ 43 million special charge for venezuelan foreign currency losses in 2014 . see part ii , item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk for further discussion of our cash held in venezuelan bolivars . in addition , american 2019s nonoperating special items included $ 48 million in special charges in the 2014 primarily related to the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes and other indebtedness . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on american 2019s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2013 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )</td><td>$ 1733</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>320</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )</td><td>218</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>professional fees</td><td>199</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>170</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total reorganization items net</td><td>$ 2640</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , american agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds . the debtors recorded an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing or facility agreement when the applicable motion was filed with the bankruptcy court to reject or modify .
Question: what was the total amount in aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections in 2013?
Answer: 320.0
Question: and what was the value of the total reorganization items net?
Answer: 2640.0
Question: how much, then, does that amount represent in relation to this value, in percentage?
Answer: 0.12121
Question: in that same year, what was the total in professional fees?
Answer: 199.0
Question: and what percentage does this total represent in relation to the 2013 total re-organization costs?
| 0.07538 |
CONVFINQA5569 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
holding other assumptions constant , the following table reflects what a one hundred basis point increase and decrease in our estimated long-term rate of return on plan assets would have on our estimated 2011 pension expense ( in millions ) : change in long-term rate of return on plan assets . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>increase ( decrease ) in expense</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets increase</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets decrease</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . plans</td><td>$ -14 ( 14 )</td><td>$ 14</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.k . plans</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>35</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>the netherlands plan</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canada plans</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>2</td></tr></table> estimated future contributions we estimate contributions of approximately $ 403 million in 2011 as compared with $ 288 million in goodwill and other intangible assets goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair market value of the net assets acquired . we classify our intangible assets acquired as either trademarks , customer relationships , technology , non-compete agreements , or other purchased intangibles . our goodwill and other intangible balances at december 31 , 2010 increased to $ 8.6 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively , compared to $ 6.1 billion and $ 791 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2009 , primarily as a result of the hewitt acquisition . although goodwill is not amortized , we test it for impairment at least annually in the fourth quarter . in the fourth quarter , we also test acquired trademarks ( which also are not amortized ) for impairment . we test more frequently if there are indicators of impairment or whenever business circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill or trademarks may not be recoverable . these indicators may include a sustained significant decline in our share price and market capitalization , a decline in our expected future cash flows , or a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate , among others . no events occurred during 2010 or 2009 that indicate the existence of an impairment with respect to our reported goodwill or trademarks . we perform impairment reviews at the reporting unit level . a reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment ( referred to as a 2018 2018component 2019 2019 ) . a component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component . an operating segment shall be deemed to be a reporting unit if all of its components are similar , if none of its components is a reporting unit , or if the segment comprises only a single component . the goodwill impairment test is a two step analysis . step one requires the fair value of each reporting unit to be compared to its book value . management must apply judgment in determining the estimated fair value of the reporting units . if the fair value of a reporting unit is determined to be greater than the carrying value of the reporting unit , goodwill and trademarks are deemed not to be impaired and no further testing is necessary . if the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value , we perform step two . step two uses the calculated fair value of the reporting unit to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit . the difference between the fair value of the reporting unit calculated in step one and the fair value of the underlying assets and liabilities of the reporting unit is the implied fair value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill . a charge is recorded in the financial statements if the carrying value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill is greater than its implied fair value. .
Question: what was the change in long-term rate of return on plan assets increase of us plans?
| 14.0 |
CONVFINQA5570 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
holding other assumptions constant , the following table reflects what a one hundred basis point increase and decrease in our estimated long-term rate of return on plan assets would have on our estimated 2011 pension expense ( in millions ) : change in long-term rate of return on plan assets . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>increase ( decrease ) in expense</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets increase</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets decrease</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . plans</td><td>$ -14 ( 14 )</td><td>$ 14</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.k . plans</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>35</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>the netherlands plan</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canada plans</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>2</td></tr></table> estimated future contributions we estimate contributions of approximately $ 403 million in 2011 as compared with $ 288 million in goodwill and other intangible assets goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair market value of the net assets acquired . we classify our intangible assets acquired as either trademarks , customer relationships , technology , non-compete agreements , or other purchased intangibles . our goodwill and other intangible balances at december 31 , 2010 increased to $ 8.6 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively , compared to $ 6.1 billion and $ 791 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2009 , primarily as a result of the hewitt acquisition . although goodwill is not amortized , we test it for impairment at least annually in the fourth quarter . in the fourth quarter , we also test acquired trademarks ( which also are not amortized ) for impairment . we test more frequently if there are indicators of impairment or whenever business circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill or trademarks may not be recoverable . these indicators may include a sustained significant decline in our share price and market capitalization , a decline in our expected future cash flows , or a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate , among others . no events occurred during 2010 or 2009 that indicate the existence of an impairment with respect to our reported goodwill or trademarks . we perform impairment reviews at the reporting unit level . a reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment ( referred to as a 2018 2018component 2019 2019 ) . a component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component . an operating segment shall be deemed to be a reporting unit if all of its components are similar , if none of its components is a reporting unit , or if the segment comprises only a single component . the goodwill impairment test is a two step analysis . step one requires the fair value of each reporting unit to be compared to its book value . management must apply judgment in determining the estimated fair value of the reporting units . if the fair value of a reporting unit is determined to be greater than the carrying value of the reporting unit , goodwill and trademarks are deemed not to be impaired and no further testing is necessary . if the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value , we perform step two . step two uses the calculated fair value of the reporting unit to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit . the difference between the fair value of the reporting unit calculated in step one and the fair value of the underlying assets and liabilities of the reporting unit is the implied fair value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill . a charge is recorded in the financial statements if the carrying value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill is greater than its implied fair value. .
Question: what was the change in long-term rate of return on plan assets increase of us plans?
Answer: 14.0
Question: and what was it for the uk plans?
| 35.0 |
CONVFINQA5571 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
holding other assumptions constant , the following table reflects what a one hundred basis point increase and decrease in our estimated long-term rate of return on plan assets would have on our estimated 2011 pension expense ( in millions ) : change in long-term rate of return on plan assets . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>increase ( decrease ) in expense</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets increase</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets decrease</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . plans</td><td>$ -14 ( 14 )</td><td>$ 14</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.k . plans</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>35</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>the netherlands plan</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canada plans</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>2</td></tr></table> estimated future contributions we estimate contributions of approximately $ 403 million in 2011 as compared with $ 288 million in goodwill and other intangible assets goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair market value of the net assets acquired . we classify our intangible assets acquired as either trademarks , customer relationships , technology , non-compete agreements , or other purchased intangibles . our goodwill and other intangible balances at december 31 , 2010 increased to $ 8.6 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively , compared to $ 6.1 billion and $ 791 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2009 , primarily as a result of the hewitt acquisition . although goodwill is not amortized , we test it for impairment at least annually in the fourth quarter . in the fourth quarter , we also test acquired trademarks ( which also are not amortized ) for impairment . we test more frequently if there are indicators of impairment or whenever business circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill or trademarks may not be recoverable . these indicators may include a sustained significant decline in our share price and market capitalization , a decline in our expected future cash flows , or a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate , among others . no events occurred during 2010 or 2009 that indicate the existence of an impairment with respect to our reported goodwill or trademarks . we perform impairment reviews at the reporting unit level . a reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment ( referred to as a 2018 2018component 2019 2019 ) . a component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component . an operating segment shall be deemed to be a reporting unit if all of its components are similar , if none of its components is a reporting unit , or if the segment comprises only a single component . the goodwill impairment test is a two step analysis . step one requires the fair value of each reporting unit to be compared to its book value . management must apply judgment in determining the estimated fair value of the reporting units . if the fair value of a reporting unit is determined to be greater than the carrying value of the reporting unit , goodwill and trademarks are deemed not to be impaired and no further testing is necessary . if the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value , we perform step two . step two uses the calculated fair value of the reporting unit to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit . the difference between the fair value of the reporting unit calculated in step one and the fair value of the underlying assets and liabilities of the reporting unit is the implied fair value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill . a charge is recorded in the financial statements if the carrying value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill is greater than its implied fair value. .
Question: what was the change in long-term rate of return on plan assets increase of us plans?
Answer: 14.0
Question: and what was it for the uk plans?
Answer: 35.0
Question: what was, then, the total long-term rate of return on plan assets increase for both of those countries?
| 49.0 |
CONVFINQA5572 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
holding other assumptions constant , the following table reflects what a one hundred basis point increase and decrease in our estimated long-term rate of return on plan assets would have on our estimated 2011 pension expense ( in millions ) : change in long-term rate of return on plan assets . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>increase ( decrease ) in expense</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets increase</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets decrease</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . plans</td><td>$ -14 ( 14 )</td><td>$ 14</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.k . plans</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>35</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>the netherlands plan</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canada plans</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>2</td></tr></table> estimated future contributions we estimate contributions of approximately $ 403 million in 2011 as compared with $ 288 million in goodwill and other intangible assets goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair market value of the net assets acquired . we classify our intangible assets acquired as either trademarks , customer relationships , technology , non-compete agreements , or other purchased intangibles . our goodwill and other intangible balances at december 31 , 2010 increased to $ 8.6 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively , compared to $ 6.1 billion and $ 791 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2009 , primarily as a result of the hewitt acquisition . although goodwill is not amortized , we test it for impairment at least annually in the fourth quarter . in the fourth quarter , we also test acquired trademarks ( which also are not amortized ) for impairment . we test more frequently if there are indicators of impairment or whenever business circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill or trademarks may not be recoverable . these indicators may include a sustained significant decline in our share price and market capitalization , a decline in our expected future cash flows , or a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate , among others . no events occurred during 2010 or 2009 that indicate the existence of an impairment with respect to our reported goodwill or trademarks . we perform impairment reviews at the reporting unit level . a reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment ( referred to as a 2018 2018component 2019 2019 ) . a component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component . an operating segment shall be deemed to be a reporting unit if all of its components are similar , if none of its components is a reporting unit , or if the segment comprises only a single component . the goodwill impairment test is a two step analysis . step one requires the fair value of each reporting unit to be compared to its book value . management must apply judgment in determining the estimated fair value of the reporting units . if the fair value of a reporting unit is determined to be greater than the carrying value of the reporting unit , goodwill and trademarks are deemed not to be impaired and no further testing is necessary . if the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value , we perform step two . step two uses the calculated fair value of the reporting unit to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit . the difference between the fair value of the reporting unit calculated in step one and the fair value of the underlying assets and liabilities of the reporting unit is the implied fair value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill . a charge is recorded in the financial statements if the carrying value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill is greater than its implied fair value. .
Question: what was the change in long-term rate of return on plan assets increase of us plans?
Answer: 14.0
Question: and what was it for the uk plans?
Answer: 35.0
Question: what was, then, the total long-term rate of return on plan assets increase for both of those countries?
Answer: 49.0
Question: and what was the long-term rate of return on plan assets increase for the netherlands plans?
| 5.0 |
CONVFINQA5573 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
holding other assumptions constant , the following table reflects what a one hundred basis point increase and decrease in our estimated long-term rate of return on plan assets would have on our estimated 2011 pension expense ( in millions ) : change in long-term rate of return on plan assets . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>increase ( decrease ) in expense</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets increase</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets decrease</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . plans</td><td>$ -14 ( 14 )</td><td>$ 14</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.k . plans</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>35</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>the netherlands plan</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canada plans</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>2</td></tr></table> estimated future contributions we estimate contributions of approximately $ 403 million in 2011 as compared with $ 288 million in goodwill and other intangible assets goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair market value of the net assets acquired . we classify our intangible assets acquired as either trademarks , customer relationships , technology , non-compete agreements , or other purchased intangibles . our goodwill and other intangible balances at december 31 , 2010 increased to $ 8.6 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively , compared to $ 6.1 billion and $ 791 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2009 , primarily as a result of the hewitt acquisition . although goodwill is not amortized , we test it for impairment at least annually in the fourth quarter . in the fourth quarter , we also test acquired trademarks ( which also are not amortized ) for impairment . we test more frequently if there are indicators of impairment or whenever business circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill or trademarks may not be recoverable . these indicators may include a sustained significant decline in our share price and market capitalization , a decline in our expected future cash flows , or a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate , among others . no events occurred during 2010 or 2009 that indicate the existence of an impairment with respect to our reported goodwill or trademarks . we perform impairment reviews at the reporting unit level . a reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment ( referred to as a 2018 2018component 2019 2019 ) . a component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component . an operating segment shall be deemed to be a reporting unit if all of its components are similar , if none of its components is a reporting unit , or if the segment comprises only a single component . the goodwill impairment test is a two step analysis . step one requires the fair value of each reporting unit to be compared to its book value . management must apply judgment in determining the estimated fair value of the reporting units . if the fair value of a reporting unit is determined to be greater than the carrying value of the reporting unit , goodwill and trademarks are deemed not to be impaired and no further testing is necessary . if the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value , we perform step two . step two uses the calculated fair value of the reporting unit to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit . the difference between the fair value of the reporting unit calculated in step one and the fair value of the underlying assets and liabilities of the reporting unit is the implied fair value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill . a charge is recorded in the financial statements if the carrying value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill is greater than its implied fair value. .
Question: what was the change in long-term rate of return on plan assets increase of us plans?
Answer: 14.0
Question: and what was it for the uk plans?
Answer: 35.0
Question: what was, then, the total long-term rate of return on plan assets increase for both of those countries?
Answer: 49.0
Question: and what was the long-term rate of return on plan assets increase for the netherlands plans?
Answer: 5.0
Question: including the netherlands, what would then be the total long-term rate of return on plan assets increase for the three countries?
| 54.0 |
CONVFINQA5574 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
holding other assumptions constant , the following table reflects what a one hundred basis point increase and decrease in our estimated long-term rate of return on plan assets would have on our estimated 2011 pension expense ( in millions ) : change in long-term rate of return on plan assets . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>increase ( decrease ) in expense</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets increase</td><td>change in long-term rateof return on plan assets decrease</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . plans</td><td>$ -14 ( 14 )</td><td>$ 14</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.k . plans</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>35</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>the netherlands plan</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>canada plans</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>2</td></tr></table> estimated future contributions we estimate contributions of approximately $ 403 million in 2011 as compared with $ 288 million in goodwill and other intangible assets goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair market value of the net assets acquired . we classify our intangible assets acquired as either trademarks , customer relationships , technology , non-compete agreements , or other purchased intangibles . our goodwill and other intangible balances at december 31 , 2010 increased to $ 8.6 billion and $ 3.6 billion , respectively , compared to $ 6.1 billion and $ 791 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2009 , primarily as a result of the hewitt acquisition . although goodwill is not amortized , we test it for impairment at least annually in the fourth quarter . in the fourth quarter , we also test acquired trademarks ( which also are not amortized ) for impairment . we test more frequently if there are indicators of impairment or whenever business circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill or trademarks may not be recoverable . these indicators may include a sustained significant decline in our share price and market capitalization , a decline in our expected future cash flows , or a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate , among others . no events occurred during 2010 or 2009 that indicate the existence of an impairment with respect to our reported goodwill or trademarks . we perform impairment reviews at the reporting unit level . a reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment ( referred to as a 2018 2018component 2019 2019 ) . a component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component . an operating segment shall be deemed to be a reporting unit if all of its components are similar , if none of its components is a reporting unit , or if the segment comprises only a single component . the goodwill impairment test is a two step analysis . step one requires the fair value of each reporting unit to be compared to its book value . management must apply judgment in determining the estimated fair value of the reporting units . if the fair value of a reporting unit is determined to be greater than the carrying value of the reporting unit , goodwill and trademarks are deemed not to be impaired and no further testing is necessary . if the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value , we perform step two . step two uses the calculated fair value of the reporting unit to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit . the difference between the fair value of the reporting unit calculated in step one and the fair value of the underlying assets and liabilities of the reporting unit is the implied fair value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill . a charge is recorded in the financial statements if the carrying value of the reporting unit 2019s goodwill is greater than its implied fair value. .
Question: what was the change in long-term rate of return on plan assets increase of us plans?
Answer: 14.0
Question: and what was it for the uk plans?
Answer: 35.0
Question: what was, then, the total long-term rate of return on plan assets increase for both of those countries?
Answer: 49.0
Question: and what was the long-term rate of return on plan assets increase for the netherlands plans?
Answer: 5.0
Question: including the netherlands, what would then be the total long-term rate of return on plan assets increase for the three countries?
Answer: 54.0
Question: and including the canada plans, what would then be the total?
| 56.0 |
CONVFINQA5575 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements commercial lending . the firm 2019s commercial lending commitments are extended to investment-grade and non-investment-grade corporate borrowers . commitments to investment-grade corporate borrowers are principally used for operating liquidity and general corporate purposes . the firm also extends lending commitments in connection with contingent acquisition financing and other types of corporate lending , as well as commercial real estate financing . commitments that are extended for contingent acquisition financing are often intended to be short-term in nature , as borrowers often seek to replace them with other funding sources . sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . ( smfg ) provides the firm with credit loss protection on certain approved loan commitments ( primarily investment-grade commercial lending commitments ) . the notional amount of such loan commitments was $ 25.70 billion and $ 26.88 billion as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively . the credit loss protection on loan commitments provided by smfg is generally limited to 95% ( 95 % ) of the first loss the firm realizes on such commitments , up to a maximum of approximately $ 950 million . in addition , subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions , upon the firm 2019s request , smfg will provide protection for 70% ( 70 % ) of additional losses on such commitments , up to a maximum of $ 1.13 billion , of which $ 550 million and $ 768 million of protection had been provided as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively . the firm also uses other financial instruments to mitigate credit risks related to certain commitments not covered by smfg . these instruments primarily include credit default swaps that reference the same or similar underlying instrument or entity , or credit default swaps that reference a market index . warehouse financing . the firm provides financing to clients who warehouse financial assets . these arrangements are secured by the warehoused assets , primarily consisting of retail and corporate loans . contingent and forward starting collateralized agreements / forward starting collateralized financings contingent and forward starting collateralized agreements includes resale and securities borrowing agreements , and forward starting collateralized financings includes repurchase and secured lending agreements that settle at a future date , generally within three business days . the firm also enters into commitments to provide contingent financing to its clients and counterparties through resale agreements . the firm 2019s funding of these commitments depends on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to the resale agreement and these commitments can expire unused . letters of credit the firm has commitments under letters of credit issued by various banks which the firm provides to counterparties in lieu of securities or cash to satisfy various collateral and margin deposit requirements . investment commitments investment commitments includes commitments to invest in private equity , real estate and other assets directly and through funds that the firm raises and manages . investment commitments included $ 2.09 billion and $ 2.10 billion as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively , related to commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm . if these commitments are called , they would be funded at market value on the date of investment . leases the firm has contractual obligations under long-term noncancelable lease agreements for office space expiring on various dates through 2069 . certain agreements are subject to periodic escalation provisions for increases in real estate taxes and other charges . the table below presents future minimum rental payments , net of minimum sublease rentals . $ in millions december 2017 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 299</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>282</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>262</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>205</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022</td><td>145</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2023 - thereafter</td><td>771</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1964</td></tr></table> rent charged to operating expenses was $ 273 million for 2017 , $ 244 million for 2016 and $ 249 million for 2015 . goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k 163 .
Question: as of december 2017, what percentage of the total future minimum rental payments were due after 2022?
| 0.39257 |
CONVFINQA5576 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements commercial lending . the firm 2019s commercial lending commitments are extended to investment-grade and non-investment-grade corporate borrowers . commitments to investment-grade corporate borrowers are principally used for operating liquidity and general corporate purposes . the firm also extends lending commitments in connection with contingent acquisition financing and other types of corporate lending , as well as commercial real estate financing . commitments that are extended for contingent acquisition financing are often intended to be short-term in nature , as borrowers often seek to replace them with other funding sources . sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . ( smfg ) provides the firm with credit loss protection on certain approved loan commitments ( primarily investment-grade commercial lending commitments ) . the notional amount of such loan commitments was $ 25.70 billion and $ 26.88 billion as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively . the credit loss protection on loan commitments provided by smfg is generally limited to 95% ( 95 % ) of the first loss the firm realizes on such commitments , up to a maximum of approximately $ 950 million . in addition , subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions , upon the firm 2019s request , smfg will provide protection for 70% ( 70 % ) of additional losses on such commitments , up to a maximum of $ 1.13 billion , of which $ 550 million and $ 768 million of protection had been provided as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively . the firm also uses other financial instruments to mitigate credit risks related to certain commitments not covered by smfg . these instruments primarily include credit default swaps that reference the same or similar underlying instrument or entity , or credit default swaps that reference a market index . warehouse financing . the firm provides financing to clients who warehouse financial assets . these arrangements are secured by the warehoused assets , primarily consisting of retail and corporate loans . contingent and forward starting collateralized agreements / forward starting collateralized financings contingent and forward starting collateralized agreements includes resale and securities borrowing agreements , and forward starting collateralized financings includes repurchase and secured lending agreements that settle at a future date , generally within three business days . the firm also enters into commitments to provide contingent financing to its clients and counterparties through resale agreements . the firm 2019s funding of these commitments depends on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to the resale agreement and these commitments can expire unused . letters of credit the firm has commitments under letters of credit issued by various banks which the firm provides to counterparties in lieu of securities or cash to satisfy various collateral and margin deposit requirements . investment commitments investment commitments includes commitments to invest in private equity , real estate and other assets directly and through funds that the firm raises and manages . investment commitments included $ 2.09 billion and $ 2.10 billion as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively , related to commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm . if these commitments are called , they would be funded at market value on the date of investment . leases the firm has contractual obligations under long-term noncancelable lease agreements for office space expiring on various dates through 2069 . certain agreements are subject to periodic escalation provisions for increases in real estate taxes and other charges . the table below presents future minimum rental payments , net of minimum sublease rentals . $ in millions december 2017 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 299</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>282</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>262</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>205</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022</td><td>145</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2023 - thereafter</td><td>771</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1964</td></tr></table> rent charged to operating expenses was $ 273 million for 2017 , $ 244 million for 2016 and $ 249 million for 2015 . goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k 163 .
Question: as of december 2017, what percentage of the total future minimum rental payments were due after 2022?
Answer: 0.39257
Question: and what percentage of them was due to the rent charged to operating expenses?
| 0.139 |
CONVFINQA5577 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
18 2015 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2015 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jkhy</td><td>100.00</td><td>127.44</td><td>148.62</td><td>205.60</td><td>263.21</td><td>290.88</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>peer group</td><td>100.00</td><td>136.78</td><td>148.10</td><td>174.79</td><td>239.10</td><td>301.34</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>130.69</td><td>137.81</td><td>166.20</td><td>207.10</td><td>222.47</td></tr></table> this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2010 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , heartland payment systems , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. . micros systems , inc . was removed from the peer group as it was acquired in september 2014. .
Question: what was the value of the jkhy stock in 2011?
| 127.44 |
CONVFINQA5578 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
18 2015 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2015 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jkhy</td><td>100.00</td><td>127.44</td><td>148.62</td><td>205.60</td><td>263.21</td><td>290.88</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>peer group</td><td>100.00</td><td>136.78</td><td>148.10</td><td>174.79</td><td>239.10</td><td>301.34</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>130.69</td><td>137.81</td><td>166.20</td><td>207.10</td><td>222.47</td></tr></table> this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2010 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , heartland payment systems , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. . micros systems , inc . was removed from the peer group as it was acquired in september 2014. .
Question: what was the value of the jkhy stock in 2011?
Answer: 127.44
Question: and what was it in 2010?
| 100.0 |
CONVFINQA5579 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
18 2015 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2015 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jkhy</td><td>100.00</td><td>127.44</td><td>148.62</td><td>205.60</td><td>263.21</td><td>290.88</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>peer group</td><td>100.00</td><td>136.78</td><td>148.10</td><td>174.79</td><td>239.10</td><td>301.34</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>130.69</td><td>137.81</td><td>166.20</td><td>207.10</td><td>222.47</td></tr></table> this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2010 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , heartland payment systems , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. . micros systems , inc . was removed from the peer group as it was acquired in september 2014. .
Question: what was the value of the jkhy stock in 2011?
Answer: 127.44
Question: and what was it in 2010?
Answer: 100.0
Question: by how much, then, did it change over the year?
| 27.44 |
CONVFINQA5580 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
18 2015 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2015 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jkhy</td><td>100.00</td><td>127.44</td><td>148.62</td><td>205.60</td><td>263.21</td><td>290.88</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>peer group</td><td>100.00</td><td>136.78</td><td>148.10</td><td>174.79</td><td>239.10</td><td>301.34</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>130.69</td><td>137.81</td><td>166.20</td><td>207.10</td><td>222.47</td></tr></table> this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2010 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , heartland payment systems , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. . micros systems , inc . was removed from the peer group as it was acquired in september 2014. .
Question: what was the value of the jkhy stock in 2011?
Answer: 127.44
Question: and what was it in 2010?
Answer: 100.0
Question: by how much, then, did it change over the year?
Answer: 27.44
Question: and for the subsequent year of this period, what was the change in the value of the peer group stock?
| 11.32 |
CONVFINQA5581 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
18 2015 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2015 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jkhy</td><td>100.00</td><td>127.44</td><td>148.62</td><td>205.60</td><td>263.21</td><td>290.88</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>peer group</td><td>100.00</td><td>136.78</td><td>148.10</td><td>174.79</td><td>239.10</td><td>301.34</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>130.69</td><td>137.81</td><td>166.20</td><td>207.10</td><td>222.47</td></tr></table> this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2010 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , heartland payment systems , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. . micros systems , inc . was removed from the peer group as it was acquired in september 2014. .
Question: what was the value of the jkhy stock in 2011?
Answer: 127.44
Question: and what was it in 2010?
Answer: 100.0
Question: by how much, then, did it change over the year?
Answer: 27.44
Question: and for the subsequent year of this period, what was the change in the value of the peer group stock?
Answer: 11.32
Question: what is this change as a percentage of that value in 2011?
| 0.08276 |
CONVFINQA5582 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/28/02</td><td>1/3/04</td><td>1/1/05</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/30/06</td><td>12/29/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.92</td><td>113.38</td><td>138.92</td><td>147.04</td><td>139.82</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s & p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.75</td><td>164.64</td><td>168.60</td><td>187.83</td><td>205.22</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s & p information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>147.23</td><td>150.99</td><td>152.49</td><td>165.32</td><td>192.28</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
Question: what was the performance value of the cadence design systems inc . in 2007?
| 139.82 |
CONVFINQA5583 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/28/02</td><td>1/3/04</td><td>1/1/05</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/30/06</td><td>12/29/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.92</td><td>113.38</td><td>138.92</td><td>147.04</td><td>139.82</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s & p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.75</td><td>164.64</td><td>168.60</td><td>187.83</td><td>205.22</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s & p information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>147.23</td><td>150.99</td><td>152.49</td><td>165.32</td><td>192.28</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
Question: what was the performance value of the cadence design systems inc . in 2007?
Answer: 139.82
Question: and what was the change in that value from 2002 to 2007?
| 39.82 |
CONVFINQA5584 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/28/02</td><td>1/3/04</td><td>1/1/05</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/30/06</td><td>12/29/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.92</td><td>113.38</td><td>138.92</td><td>147.04</td><td>139.82</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s & p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.75</td><td>164.64</td><td>168.60</td><td>187.83</td><td>205.22</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s & p information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>147.23</td><td>150.99</td><td>152.49</td><td>165.32</td><td>192.28</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
Question: what was the performance value of the cadence design systems inc . in 2007?
Answer: 139.82
Question: and what was the change in that value from 2002 to 2007?
Answer: 39.82
Question: how much does this change represent in relation to the 2002 performance value of that stock, in percentage?
| 0.3982 |
CONVFINQA5585 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2022 notes . 2021 notes . in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity . net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc . interest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , which commenced november 24 , 2011 , and is approximately $ 32 million per year . the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2021 notes . 2019 notes . in december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2014 at maturity , and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2019 ( the 201c2019 notes 201d ) . net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors from barclays on december 1 , 2009 , and for general corporate purposes . interest on the 2019 notes of approximately $ 50 million per year is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year . these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2019 notes . 2017 notes . in september 2007 , the company issued $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15 , 2017 ( the 201c2017 notes 201d ) . a portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund-of-funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes . interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year , or approximately $ 44 million per year . the 2017 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2017 notes . 13 . commitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2035 . future minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>142</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>135</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>125</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>120</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021</td><td>112</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>404</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1038</td></tr></table> rent expense and certain office equipment expense under lease agreements amounted to $ 134 million , $ 136 million and $ 132 million in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . investment commitments . at december 31 , 2016 , the company had $ 192 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds , including consolidated vies . these funds include private equity funds , real assets funds , and opportunistic funds . this amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds . in addition to the capital commitments of $ 192 million , the company had approximately $ 12 million of contingent commitments for certain funds which have investment periods that have expired . generally , the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment . these unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition . these commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company that are not yet legally binding . the company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for , and with , its clients . contingencies contingent payments related to business acquisitions . in connection with certain acquisitions , blackrock is required to make contingent payments , subject to achieving specified performance targets , which may include revenue related to acquired contracts or new capital commitments for certain products . the fair value of the remaining aggregate contingent payments at december 31 , 2016 totaled $ 115 million and is included in other liabilities on the consolidated statement of financial condition . other contingent payments . the company acts as the portfolio manager in a series of derivative transactions and has a maximum potential exposure of $ 17 million between the company and counterparty . see note 7 , derivatives and hedging , for further discussion . legal proceedings . from time to time , blackrock receives subpoenas or other requests for information from various u.s . federal , state governmental and domestic and international regulatory authorities in connection with .
Question: what was the change in rent expense and rent certain office expenses from 2016 to 2017?
| 8.0 |
CONVFINQA5586 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2022 notes . 2021 notes . in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity . net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc . interest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , which commenced november 24 , 2011 , and is approximately $ 32 million per year . the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2021 notes . 2019 notes . in december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2014 at maturity , and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2019 ( the 201c2019 notes 201d ) . net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors from barclays on december 1 , 2009 , and for general corporate purposes . interest on the 2019 notes of approximately $ 50 million per year is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year . these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2019 notes . 2017 notes . in september 2007 , the company issued $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15 , 2017 ( the 201c2017 notes 201d ) . a portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund-of-funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes . interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year , or approximately $ 44 million per year . the 2017 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2017 notes . 13 . commitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2035 . future minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>142</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>135</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>125</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>120</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021</td><td>112</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>404</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1038</td></tr></table> rent expense and certain office equipment expense under lease agreements amounted to $ 134 million , $ 136 million and $ 132 million in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . investment commitments . at december 31 , 2016 , the company had $ 192 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds , including consolidated vies . these funds include private equity funds , real assets funds , and opportunistic funds . this amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds . in addition to the capital commitments of $ 192 million , the company had approximately $ 12 million of contingent commitments for certain funds which have investment periods that have expired . generally , the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment . these unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition . these commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company that are not yet legally binding . the company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for , and with , its clients . contingencies contingent payments related to business acquisitions . in connection with certain acquisitions , blackrock is required to make contingent payments , subject to achieving specified performance targets , which may include revenue related to acquired contracts or new capital commitments for certain products . the fair value of the remaining aggregate contingent payments at december 31 , 2016 totaled $ 115 million and is included in other liabilities on the consolidated statement of financial condition . other contingent payments . the company acts as the portfolio manager in a series of derivative transactions and has a maximum potential exposure of $ 17 million between the company and counterparty . see note 7 , derivatives and hedging , for further discussion . legal proceedings . from time to time , blackrock receives subpoenas or other requests for information from various u.s . federal , state governmental and domestic and international regulatory authorities in connection with .
Question: what was the change in rent expense and rent certain office expenses from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 8.0
Question: what was the value in 2016?
| 134.0 |
CONVFINQA5587 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2022 notes . 2021 notes . in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity . net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc . interest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , which commenced november 24 , 2011 , and is approximately $ 32 million per year . the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2021 notes . 2019 notes . in december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2014 at maturity , and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2019 ( the 201c2019 notes 201d ) . net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors from barclays on december 1 , 2009 , and for general corporate purposes . interest on the 2019 notes of approximately $ 50 million per year is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year . these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2019 notes . 2017 notes . in september 2007 , the company issued $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15 , 2017 ( the 201c2017 notes 201d ) . a portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund-of-funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes . interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year , or approximately $ 44 million per year . the 2017 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2017 notes . 13 . commitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2035 . future minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>142</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>135</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>125</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>120</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021</td><td>112</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>404</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1038</td></tr></table> rent expense and certain office equipment expense under lease agreements amounted to $ 134 million , $ 136 million and $ 132 million in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . investment commitments . at december 31 , 2016 , the company had $ 192 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds , including consolidated vies . these funds include private equity funds , real assets funds , and opportunistic funds . this amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds . in addition to the capital commitments of $ 192 million , the company had approximately $ 12 million of contingent commitments for certain funds which have investment periods that have expired . generally , the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment . these unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition . these commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company that are not yet legally binding . the company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for , and with , its clients . contingencies contingent payments related to business acquisitions . in connection with certain acquisitions , blackrock is required to make contingent payments , subject to achieving specified performance targets , which may include revenue related to acquired contracts or new capital commitments for certain products . the fair value of the remaining aggregate contingent payments at december 31 , 2016 totaled $ 115 million and is included in other liabilities on the consolidated statement of financial condition . other contingent payments . the company acts as the portfolio manager in a series of derivative transactions and has a maximum potential exposure of $ 17 million between the company and counterparty . see note 7 , derivatives and hedging , for further discussion . legal proceedings . from time to time , blackrock receives subpoenas or other requests for information from various u.s . federal , state governmental and domestic and international regulatory authorities in connection with .
Question: what was the change in rent expense and rent certain office expenses from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 8.0
Question: what was the value in 2016?
Answer: 134.0
Question: what is the change over the 2016 value?
| 0.0597 |
CONVFINQA5588 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2015 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1424356 $ 33.90 4281952 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 )</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>1424356</td><td>$ 33.90</td><td>4281952</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>1424356</td><td>$ 33.90</td><td>4281952</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 533397 were subject to stock options and 54191 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 35553 stock rights , 10279 restricted stock rights , and 790936 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 533397 outstanding stock options only . ( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .
Question: what is the total number of shares of equity compensation plans approved by security holders?
| 5706308.0 |
CONVFINQA5589 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2015 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1424356 $ 33.90 4281952 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 )</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>1424356</td><td>$ 33.90</td><td>4281952</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>1424356</td><td>$ 33.90</td><td>4281952</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 533397 were subject to stock options and 54191 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 35553 stock rights , 10279 restricted stock rights , and 790936 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 533397 outstanding stock options only . ( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .
Question: what is the total number of shares of equity compensation plans approved by security holders?
Answer: 5706308.0
Question: what is the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans?
| 4281952.0 |
CONVFINQA5590 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2015 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1424356 $ 33.90 4281952 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 )</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>1424356</td><td>$ 33.90</td><td>4281952</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>1424356</td><td>$ 33.90</td><td>4281952</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 533397 were subject to stock options and 54191 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 35553 stock rights , 10279 restricted stock rights , and 790936 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 533397 outstanding stock options only . ( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .
Question: what is the total number of shares of equity compensation plans approved by security holders?
Answer: 5706308.0
Question: what is the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans?
Answer: 4281952.0
Question: what proportion does this represent?
| 0.75039 |
CONVFINQA5591 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph the following performance graph compares the cumulative total return ( including dividends ) to the holders of our common stock from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007 , with the cumulative total returns of the nyse composite index , the ftse nareit composite reit index ( the 201call reit index 201d ) , the ftse nareit healthcare equity reit index ( the 201chealthcare reit index 201d ) and the russell 1000 index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , as applicable . we have included the nyse composite index in the performance graph because our common stock is listed on the nyse . we have included the other indices because we believe that they are either most representative of the industry in which we compete , or otherwise provide a fair basis for comparison with ventas , and are therefore particularly relevant to an assessment of our performance . the figures in the table below are rounded to the nearest dollar. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2002</td><td>12/31/2003</td><td>12/31/2004</td><td>12/31/2005</td><td>12/31/2006</td><td>12/31/2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ventas</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 206</td><td>$ 270</td><td>$ 331</td><td>$ 457</td><td>$ 512</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nyse composite index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 151</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 200</td><td>$ 217</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>all reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 181</td><td>$ 196</td><td>$ 262</td><td>$ 215</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>healthcare reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 186</td><td>$ 189</td><td>$ 273</td><td>$ 279</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>russell 1000 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 188</td></tr></table> ventas nyse composite index all reit index healthcare reit index russell 1000 index .
Question: what was the value of reit index in 2003?
| 138.0 |
CONVFINQA5592 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph the following performance graph compares the cumulative total return ( including dividends ) to the holders of our common stock from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007 , with the cumulative total returns of the nyse composite index , the ftse nareit composite reit index ( the 201call reit index 201d ) , the ftse nareit healthcare equity reit index ( the 201chealthcare reit index 201d ) and the russell 1000 index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , as applicable . we have included the nyse composite index in the performance graph because our common stock is listed on the nyse . we have included the other indices because we believe that they are either most representative of the industry in which we compete , or otherwise provide a fair basis for comparison with ventas , and are therefore particularly relevant to an assessment of our performance . the figures in the table below are rounded to the nearest dollar. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2002</td><td>12/31/2003</td><td>12/31/2004</td><td>12/31/2005</td><td>12/31/2006</td><td>12/31/2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ventas</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 206</td><td>$ 270</td><td>$ 331</td><td>$ 457</td><td>$ 512</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nyse composite index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 151</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 200</td><td>$ 217</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>all reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 181</td><td>$ 196</td><td>$ 262</td><td>$ 215</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>healthcare reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 186</td><td>$ 189</td><td>$ 273</td><td>$ 279</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>russell 1000 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 188</td></tr></table> ventas nyse composite index all reit index healthcare reit index russell 1000 index .
Question: what was the value of reit index in 2003?
Answer: 138.0
Question: and what was, then, the change in its value considering the original amount invested in it in 2002?
| 38.0 |
CONVFINQA5593 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph the following performance graph compares the cumulative total return ( including dividends ) to the holders of our common stock from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007 , with the cumulative total returns of the nyse composite index , the ftse nareit composite reit index ( the 201call reit index 201d ) , the ftse nareit healthcare equity reit index ( the 201chealthcare reit index 201d ) and the russell 1000 index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , as applicable . we have included the nyse composite index in the performance graph because our common stock is listed on the nyse . we have included the other indices because we believe that they are either most representative of the industry in which we compete , or otherwise provide a fair basis for comparison with ventas , and are therefore particularly relevant to an assessment of our performance . the figures in the table below are rounded to the nearest dollar. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2002</td><td>12/31/2003</td><td>12/31/2004</td><td>12/31/2005</td><td>12/31/2006</td><td>12/31/2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ventas</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 206</td><td>$ 270</td><td>$ 331</td><td>$ 457</td><td>$ 512</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nyse composite index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 151</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 200</td><td>$ 217</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>all reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 181</td><td>$ 196</td><td>$ 262</td><td>$ 215</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>healthcare reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 186</td><td>$ 189</td><td>$ 273</td><td>$ 279</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>russell 1000 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 188</td></tr></table> ventas nyse composite index all reit index healthcare reit index russell 1000 index .
Question: what was the value of reit index in 2003?
Answer: 138.0
Question: and what was, then, the change in its value considering the original amount invested in it in 2002?
Answer: 38.0
Question: how much does this change represent in relation to this original amount?
| 0.38 |
CONVFINQA5594 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the pension plan investments are held in a master trust , with the northern trust company . investments in the master trust are valued at fair value , which has been determined based on fair value of the underlying investments of the master trust . investments in securities traded on public security exchanges are valued at their closing market prices on the valuation date ; where no sale was made on the valuation date , the security is generally valued at its most recent bid price . certain short-term investments are carried at cost , which approximates fair value . investments in registered investment companies and common trust funds , which primarily invest in stocks , bonds , and commodity futures , are valued using publicly available market prices for the underlying investments held by these entities . the majority of pension plan assets are invested in equity securities , because equity portfolios have historically provided higher returns than debt and other asset classes over extended time horizons , and are expected to do so in the future . correspondingly , equity investments also entail greater risks than other investments . equity risks are balanced by investing a significant portion of the plan 2019s assets in high quality debt securities . the average quality rating of the debt portfolio exceeded aa as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 . the debt portfolio is also broadly diversified and invested primarily in u.s . treasury , mortgage , and corporate securities with an intermediate average maturity . the weighted-average maturity of the debt portfolio was 5 years at both december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the investment of pension plan assets in securities issued by union pacific is specifically prohibited for both the equity and debt portfolios , other than through index fund holdings . other retirement programs thrift plan 2013 we provide a defined contribution plan ( thrift plan ) to eligible non-union employees and make matching contributions to the thrift plan . we match 50 cents for each dollar contributed by employees up to the first six percent of compensation contributed . our thrift plan contributions were $ 14 million in 2008 , $ 14 million in 2007 , and $ 13 million in 2006 . railroad retirement system 2013 all railroad employees are covered by the railroad retirement system ( the system ) . contributions made to the system are expensed as incurred and amounted to approximately $ 620 million in 2008 , $ 616 million in 2007 , and $ 615 million in 2006 . collective bargaining agreements 2013 under collective bargaining agreements , we provide certain postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits for eligible union employees . premiums under the plans are expensed as incurred and amounted to $ 49 million in 2008 and $ 40 million in both 2007 and 5 . other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>rental income</td><td>$ 87</td><td>$ 68</td><td>$ 83</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net gain on non-operating asset dispositions</td><td>41</td><td>52</td><td>72</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest income</td><td>21</td><td>50</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>sale of receivables fees</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-operating environmental costs and other</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 92</td><td>$ 116</td><td>$ 118</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was rental income in 2007?
| 68.0 |
CONVFINQA5595 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the pension plan investments are held in a master trust , with the northern trust company . investments in the master trust are valued at fair value , which has been determined based on fair value of the underlying investments of the master trust . investments in securities traded on public security exchanges are valued at their closing market prices on the valuation date ; where no sale was made on the valuation date , the security is generally valued at its most recent bid price . certain short-term investments are carried at cost , which approximates fair value . investments in registered investment companies and common trust funds , which primarily invest in stocks , bonds , and commodity futures , are valued using publicly available market prices for the underlying investments held by these entities . the majority of pension plan assets are invested in equity securities , because equity portfolios have historically provided higher returns than debt and other asset classes over extended time horizons , and are expected to do so in the future . correspondingly , equity investments also entail greater risks than other investments . equity risks are balanced by investing a significant portion of the plan 2019s assets in high quality debt securities . the average quality rating of the debt portfolio exceeded aa as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 . the debt portfolio is also broadly diversified and invested primarily in u.s . treasury , mortgage , and corporate securities with an intermediate average maturity . the weighted-average maturity of the debt portfolio was 5 years at both december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the investment of pension plan assets in securities issued by union pacific is specifically prohibited for both the equity and debt portfolios , other than through index fund holdings . other retirement programs thrift plan 2013 we provide a defined contribution plan ( thrift plan ) to eligible non-union employees and make matching contributions to the thrift plan . we match 50 cents for each dollar contributed by employees up to the first six percent of compensation contributed . our thrift plan contributions were $ 14 million in 2008 , $ 14 million in 2007 , and $ 13 million in 2006 . railroad retirement system 2013 all railroad employees are covered by the railroad retirement system ( the system ) . contributions made to the system are expensed as incurred and amounted to approximately $ 620 million in 2008 , $ 616 million in 2007 , and $ 615 million in 2006 . collective bargaining agreements 2013 under collective bargaining agreements , we provide certain postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits for eligible union employees . premiums under the plans are expensed as incurred and amounted to $ 49 million in 2008 and $ 40 million in both 2007 and 5 . other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>rental income</td><td>$ 87</td><td>$ 68</td><td>$ 83</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net gain on non-operating asset dispositions</td><td>41</td><td>52</td><td>72</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest income</td><td>21</td><td>50</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>sale of receivables fees</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-operating environmental costs and other</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 92</td><td>$ 116</td><td>$ 118</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was rental income in 2007?
Answer: 68.0
Question: what was it in 2006?
| 83.0 |
CONVFINQA5596 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the pension plan investments are held in a master trust , with the northern trust company . investments in the master trust are valued at fair value , which has been determined based on fair value of the underlying investments of the master trust . investments in securities traded on public security exchanges are valued at their closing market prices on the valuation date ; where no sale was made on the valuation date , the security is generally valued at its most recent bid price . certain short-term investments are carried at cost , which approximates fair value . investments in registered investment companies and common trust funds , which primarily invest in stocks , bonds , and commodity futures , are valued using publicly available market prices for the underlying investments held by these entities . the majority of pension plan assets are invested in equity securities , because equity portfolios have historically provided higher returns than debt and other asset classes over extended time horizons , and are expected to do so in the future . correspondingly , equity investments also entail greater risks than other investments . equity risks are balanced by investing a significant portion of the plan 2019s assets in high quality debt securities . the average quality rating of the debt portfolio exceeded aa as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 . the debt portfolio is also broadly diversified and invested primarily in u.s . treasury , mortgage , and corporate securities with an intermediate average maturity . the weighted-average maturity of the debt portfolio was 5 years at both december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the investment of pension plan assets in securities issued by union pacific is specifically prohibited for both the equity and debt portfolios , other than through index fund holdings . other retirement programs thrift plan 2013 we provide a defined contribution plan ( thrift plan ) to eligible non-union employees and make matching contributions to the thrift plan . we match 50 cents for each dollar contributed by employees up to the first six percent of compensation contributed . our thrift plan contributions were $ 14 million in 2008 , $ 14 million in 2007 , and $ 13 million in 2006 . railroad retirement system 2013 all railroad employees are covered by the railroad retirement system ( the system ) . contributions made to the system are expensed as incurred and amounted to approximately $ 620 million in 2008 , $ 616 million in 2007 , and $ 615 million in 2006 . collective bargaining agreements 2013 under collective bargaining agreements , we provide certain postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits for eligible union employees . premiums under the plans are expensed as incurred and amounted to $ 49 million in 2008 and $ 40 million in both 2007 and 5 . other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>rental income</td><td>$ 87</td><td>$ 68</td><td>$ 83</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net gain on non-operating asset dispositions</td><td>41</td><td>52</td><td>72</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest income</td><td>21</td><td>50</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>sale of receivables fees</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-operating environmental costs and other</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 92</td><td>$ 116</td><td>$ 118</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was rental income in 2007?
Answer: 68.0
Question: what was it in 2006?
Answer: 83.0
Question: what is the net change?
| -15.0 |
CONVFINQA5597 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the pension plan investments are held in a master trust , with the northern trust company . investments in the master trust are valued at fair value , which has been determined based on fair value of the underlying investments of the master trust . investments in securities traded on public security exchanges are valued at their closing market prices on the valuation date ; where no sale was made on the valuation date , the security is generally valued at its most recent bid price . certain short-term investments are carried at cost , which approximates fair value . investments in registered investment companies and common trust funds , which primarily invest in stocks , bonds , and commodity futures , are valued using publicly available market prices for the underlying investments held by these entities . the majority of pension plan assets are invested in equity securities , because equity portfolios have historically provided higher returns than debt and other asset classes over extended time horizons , and are expected to do so in the future . correspondingly , equity investments also entail greater risks than other investments . equity risks are balanced by investing a significant portion of the plan 2019s assets in high quality debt securities . the average quality rating of the debt portfolio exceeded aa as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 . the debt portfolio is also broadly diversified and invested primarily in u.s . treasury , mortgage , and corporate securities with an intermediate average maturity . the weighted-average maturity of the debt portfolio was 5 years at both december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the investment of pension plan assets in securities issued by union pacific is specifically prohibited for both the equity and debt portfolios , other than through index fund holdings . other retirement programs thrift plan 2013 we provide a defined contribution plan ( thrift plan ) to eligible non-union employees and make matching contributions to the thrift plan . we match 50 cents for each dollar contributed by employees up to the first six percent of compensation contributed . our thrift plan contributions were $ 14 million in 2008 , $ 14 million in 2007 , and $ 13 million in 2006 . railroad retirement system 2013 all railroad employees are covered by the railroad retirement system ( the system ) . contributions made to the system are expensed as incurred and amounted to approximately $ 620 million in 2008 , $ 616 million in 2007 , and $ 615 million in 2006 . collective bargaining agreements 2013 under collective bargaining agreements , we provide certain postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits for eligible union employees . premiums under the plans are expensed as incurred and amounted to $ 49 million in 2008 and $ 40 million in both 2007 and 5 . other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>rental income</td><td>$ 87</td><td>$ 68</td><td>$ 83</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net gain on non-operating asset dispositions</td><td>41</td><td>52</td><td>72</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest income</td><td>21</td><td>50</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>sale of receivables fees</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-operating environmental costs and other</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 92</td><td>$ 116</td><td>$ 118</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was rental income in 2007?
Answer: 68.0
Question: what was it in 2006?
Answer: 83.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -15.0
Question: what was the 2006 value?
| 83.0 |
CONVFINQA5598 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the pension plan investments are held in a master trust , with the northern trust company . investments in the master trust are valued at fair value , which has been determined based on fair value of the underlying investments of the master trust . investments in securities traded on public security exchanges are valued at their closing market prices on the valuation date ; where no sale was made on the valuation date , the security is generally valued at its most recent bid price . certain short-term investments are carried at cost , which approximates fair value . investments in registered investment companies and common trust funds , which primarily invest in stocks , bonds , and commodity futures , are valued using publicly available market prices for the underlying investments held by these entities . the majority of pension plan assets are invested in equity securities , because equity portfolios have historically provided higher returns than debt and other asset classes over extended time horizons , and are expected to do so in the future . correspondingly , equity investments also entail greater risks than other investments . equity risks are balanced by investing a significant portion of the plan 2019s assets in high quality debt securities . the average quality rating of the debt portfolio exceeded aa as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 . the debt portfolio is also broadly diversified and invested primarily in u.s . treasury , mortgage , and corporate securities with an intermediate average maturity . the weighted-average maturity of the debt portfolio was 5 years at both december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the investment of pension plan assets in securities issued by union pacific is specifically prohibited for both the equity and debt portfolios , other than through index fund holdings . other retirement programs thrift plan 2013 we provide a defined contribution plan ( thrift plan ) to eligible non-union employees and make matching contributions to the thrift plan . we match 50 cents for each dollar contributed by employees up to the first six percent of compensation contributed . our thrift plan contributions were $ 14 million in 2008 , $ 14 million in 2007 , and $ 13 million in 2006 . railroad retirement system 2013 all railroad employees are covered by the railroad retirement system ( the system ) . contributions made to the system are expensed as incurred and amounted to approximately $ 620 million in 2008 , $ 616 million in 2007 , and $ 615 million in 2006 . collective bargaining agreements 2013 under collective bargaining agreements , we provide certain postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits for eligible union employees . premiums under the plans are expensed as incurred and amounted to $ 49 million in 2008 and $ 40 million in both 2007 and 5 . other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>rental income</td><td>$ 87</td><td>$ 68</td><td>$ 83</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net gain on non-operating asset dispositions</td><td>41</td><td>52</td><td>72</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest income</td><td>21</td><td>50</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>sale of receivables fees</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-operating environmental costs and other</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 92</td><td>$ 116</td><td>$ 118</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was rental income in 2007?
Answer: 68.0
Question: what was it in 2006?
Answer: 83.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -15.0
Question: what was the 2006 value?
Answer: 83.0
Question: what is the net change divided by the 2006 value?
| -0.18072 |
CONVFINQA5599 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial conditionand results of operations d u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 1 1 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t 2022 interest expense on the company 2019s secured debt decreased from $ 30.8 million in 2001 to $ 22.9 million in 2002 as the company paid off $ 13.5 million of secured debt throughout 2002 and experienced lower borrowings on its secured line of credit during 2002 compared to 2001 . additionally , the company paid off approximately $ 128.5 million of secured debt throughout 2001 . 2022 interest expense on the company 2019s $ 500 million unsecured line of credit decreased by approximately $ 1.1 million in 2002 compared to 2001 as the company maintained lower balances on the line throughout most of 2002 . as a result of the above-mentioned items , earnings from rental operations decreased $ 35.0 million from $ 254.1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , to $ 219.1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 . service operations service operations primarily consist of leasing , management , construction and development services for joint venture properties and properties owned by third parties . service operations revenues decreased from $ 80.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , to $ 68.6 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 . the prolonged effect of the slow economy has been the primary factor in the overall decrease in revenues . the company experienced a decrease of $ 12.7 million in net general contractor revenues because of a decrease in the volume of construction in 2002 , compared to 2001 , as well as slightly lower profit margins . property management , maintenance and leasing fee revenues decreased from $ 22.8 million in 2001 to $ 14.3 million in 2002 primarily because of a decrease in landscaping maintenance revenue resulting from the sale of the landscaping operations in the third quarter of 2001 . construction management and development activity income represents construction and development fees earned on projects where the company acts as the construction manager along with profits from the company 2019s held for sale program whereby the company develops a property for sale upon completion . the increase in revenues of $ 10.3 million in 2002 is primarily due to an increase in volume of the sale of properties from the held for sale program . service operations expenses decreased from $ 45.3 million in 2001 to $ 38.3 million in 2002 . the decrease is attributable to the decrease in construction and development activity and the reduced overhead costs as a result of the sale of the landscape business in 2001 . as a result of the above , earnings from service operations decreased from $ 35.1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , to $ 30.3 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 . general and administrative expense general and administrative expense increased from $ 15.6 million in 2001 to $ 25.4 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 . the company has been successful reducing total operating and administration costs ; however , reduced construction and development activities have resulted in a greater amount of overhead being charged to general and administrative expense instead of being capitalized into development projects or charged to service operations . other income and expenses gain on sale of land and depreciable property dispositions , net of impairment adjustment , is comprised of the following amounts in 2002 and 2001 : gain on sales of depreciable properties represent sales of previously held for investment rental properties . beginning in 2000 and continuing into 2001 , the company pursued favorable opportunities to dispose of real estate assets that no longer met long-term investment objectives . in 2002 , the company significantly reduced this property sales program until the business climate improves and provides better investment opportunities for the sale proceeds . gain on land sales represents sales of undeveloped land owned by the company . the company pursues opportunities to dispose of land in markets with a high concentration of undeveloped land and those markets where the land no longer meets strategic development plans of the company . the company recorded a $ 9.4 million adjustment in 2002 associated with six properties determined to have an impairment of book value . the company has analyzed each of its in-service properties and has determined that there are no additional valuation adjustments that need to be made as of december 31 , 2002 . the company recorded an adjustment of $ 4.8 million in 2001 for one property that the company had contracted to sell for a price less than its book value . other revenue for the year ended december 31 , 2002 , includes $ 1.4 million of gain related to an interest rate swap that did not qualify for hedge accounting. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gain on sales of depreciable properties</td><td>$ 4491</td><td>$ 45428</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gain on land sales</td><td>4478</td><td>5080</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>impairment adjustment</td><td>-9379 ( 9379 )</td><td>-4800 ( 4800 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ -410 ( 410 )</td><td>$ 45708</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the net change in value of general and administrative expenses from 2001 to 2002?
| 9.8 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.